This is a modern-English version of Locusts and Wild Honey, originally written by Burroughs, John. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.



Locusts and Wild Honey

by John Burroughs


Contents

PREFACE
I. THE PASTORAL BEES
II. SHARP EYES
III. STRAWBERRIES
IV. IS IT GOING TO RAIN?
V. SPECKLED TROUT
VI. BIRDS AND BIRDS
VII. A BED OF BOUGHS
VIII. BIRDS’-NESTING
IX. THE HALCYON IN CANADA
INDEX

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

JOHN BURROUGHS
From a photograph
WHIP-POOR WILL
From a drawing by L. A. Fuertes
TROUT STREAM
From a photograph by Herbert W. Gleason
YELLOW BIRCHES
From a photograph by Herbert W. Gleason
LEDGES
From a photograph by Herbert W. Gleason
KINGFISHER (colored)
From a drawing by L. A. Fuertes

Burroughs and dog

PREFACE

I am aware that for the most part the title of my book is an allegory rather than an actual description; but readers who have followed me heretofore, I trust, will not be puzzled or misled in the present case by any want of literalness in the matter of the title. If the name carries with it a suggestion of the wild and delectable in nature, of the free and ungarnered harvests which the wilderness everywhere affords to the observing eye and ear, it will prove sufficiently explicit for my purpose.

I know that, for the most part, the title of my book is an allegory rather than a straightforward description; however, I trust that my readers who have followed me so far won’t be confused or misled in this case by any lack of literalness in the title. If the name suggests the wild and enjoyable aspects of nature, as well as the free and untapped treasures that the wilderness offers to those who take the time to observe, it will be clear enough for my purpose.

ESOPUS-ON-HUDSON, N. Y.

Esopus, NY


I
THE PASTORAL BEES

The honey-bee goes forth from the hive in spring like the dove from Noah’s ark, and it is not till after many days that she brings back the olive leaf, which in this case is a pellet of golden pollen upon each hip, usually obtained from the alder or the swamp willow. In a country where maple sugar is made the bees get their first taste of sweet from the sap as it flows from the spiles, or as it dries and is condensed upon the sides of the buckets. They will sometimes, in their eagerness, come about the boiling-place and be overwhelmed by the steam and the smoke. But bees appear to be more eager for bread in the spring than for honey: their supply of this article, perhaps, does not keep as well as their stores of the latter; hence fresh bread, in the shape of new pollen, is diligently sought for. My bees get their first supplies from the catkins of the willows. How quickly they find them out! If but one catkin opens anywhere within range, a bee is on hand that very hour to rifle it, and it is a most pleasing experience to stand near the hive some mild April day and see them come pouring in with their little baskets packed with this first fruitage of the spring. They will have new bread now; they have been to mill in good earnest; see their dusty coats, and the golden grist they bring home with them.

The honeybee leaves the hive in spring like the dove from Noah’s ark, and it takes many days before she returns with the olive leaf, which in this case is a lump of golden pollen on each leg, usually collected from the alder or the swamp willow. In a place where maple sugar is made, the bees get their first taste of sweetness from the sap as it flows from the spouts or as it dries and collects on the sides of the buckets. Sometimes, eager to get the sweet stuff, they gather around the boiling area and get overwhelmed by the steam and smoke. However, bees seem to be more focused on finding food in the spring than on honey; their supply of this food probably doesn’t store as well as their honey reserves, so they actively search for fresh food in the form of new pollen. My bees get their first supplies from the catkins of the willows. They find them so quickly! If just one catkin opens anywhere nearby, a bee will be there that very hour to collect from it, and it’s a delightful experience to stand near the hive on a warm April day and watch them return with their little baskets full of this first harvest of spring. They have new food now; they’ve been working hard, just look at their dusty bodies and the golden grains they bring back with them.

When a bee brings pollen into the hive he advances to the cell in which it is to be deposited and kicks it off, as one might his overalls or rubber boots, making one foot help the other; then he walks off without ever looking behind him; another bee, one of the indoor hands, comes along and rams it down with his head and packs it into the cell, as the dairymaid packs butter into a firkin with a ladle.

When a bee brings pollen into the hive, he goes to the cell where it needs to be stored and pushes it off, like someone might take off their overalls or rubber boots, using one foot to assist the other; then he walks away without looking back. Another bee, one of the indoor workers, comes by, pushes it down with his head, and packs it into the cell, just like a dairymaid packs butter into a container with a ladle.

The first spring wild-flowers, whose sly faces among the dry leaves and rocks are so welcome, are rarely frequented by the bee. The anemone, the hepatica, the bloodroot, the arbutus, the numerous violets, the spring beauty, the corydalis, etc., woo all lovers of nature, but seldom woo the honey-loving bee. The arbutus, lying low and keeping green all winter, attains to perfume and honey, but only once have I seen it frequented by bees.

The first spring wildflowers, with their charming faces peeking out from the dry leaves and rocks, are a welcome sight but are rarely visited by bees. The anemone, hepatica, bloodroot, arbutus, various violets, spring beauty, corydalis, and others attract all nature lovers, but hardly ever attract the honey-loving bee. The arbutus, which stays low and green throughout winter, produces fragrance and nectar, but I’ve only seen it visited by bees once.

The first honey is perhaps obtained from the flowers of the red maple and the golden willow. The latter sends forth a wild, delicious perfume. The sugar maple blooms a little later, and from its silken tassels a rich nectar is gathered. My bees will not label these different varieties for me, as I really wish they would. Honey from the maple, a tree so clean and wholesome, and full of such virtues every way, would be something to put one’s tongue to. Or that from the blossoms of the apple, the peach, the cherry, the quince, the currant,—one would like a card of each of these varieties to note their peculiar qualities. The apple-blossom is very important to the bees. A single swarm has been known to gain twenty pounds in weight during its continuance. Bees love the ripened fruit, too, and in August and September will such themselves tipsy upon varieties such as the sops-of-wine.

The first honey probably comes from the flowers of the red maple and the golden willow. The willow has a wild, sweet fragrance. The sugar maple blooms a bit later, and from its silky tassels, a rich nectar is collected. My bees won't label these different kinds for me, which is something I really wish they would do. Honey from the maple, such a clean and wholesome tree, full of so many virtues, would be delightful to taste. Or honey from the blossoms of the apple, peach, cherry, quince, and currant—I'd love to have a card for each of these types to note their unique qualities. The apple blossom is especially important to the bees. One colony has been known to gain twenty pounds in weight while gathering it. Bees also love ripe fruit, and in August and September, they can get a bit tipsy from varieties like the sops-of-wine.

The interval between the blooming of the fruit-trees and that of the clover and the raspberry is bridged over in many localities by the honey locust. What a delightful summer murmur these trees send forth at this season! I know nothing about the quality of the honey, but it ought to keep well. But when the red raspberry blooms, the fountains of plenty are unsealed indeed; what a commotion about the hives then, especially in localities where it is extensively cultivated, as in places along the Hudson! The delicate white clover, which begins to bloom about the same time, is neglected; even honey itself is passed by for this modest, colorless, all but odorless flower. A field of these berries in June sends forth a continuous murmur like that of an enormous hive. The honey is not so white as that obtained from clover, but it is easier gathered; it is in shallow cups, while that of the clover is in deep tubes. The bees are up and at it before sunrise, and it takes a brisk shower to drive them in. But the clover blooms later and blooms everywhere, and is the staple source of supply of the finest quality of honey. The red clover yields up its stores only to the longer proboscis of the bumblebee, else the bee pasturage of our agricultural districts would be unequaled. I do not know from what the famous honey of Chamouni in the Alps is made, but it can hardly surpass our best products. The snow-white honey of Anatolia in Asiatic Turkey, which is regularly sent to Constantinople for the use of the grand seignior and the ladies of his seraglio, is obtained from the cotton plant, which makes me think that the white clover does not flourish there. The white clover is indigenous with us; its seeds seem latent in the ground, and the application of certain stimulants to the soil, such as wood ashes, causes them to germinate and spring up.

The gap between when fruit trees bloom and when clover and raspberry do is often filled in many places by the honey locust. What a lovely summer sound these trees create at this time! I don't know much about the quality of the honey, but it should last well. When the red raspberry flowers, it's like the floodgates open; there’s such activity around the hives then, especially in areas where it's widely grown, like along the Hudson! The delicate white clover, which starts blooming around the same time, gets ignored; even honey itself is overlooked for this modest, colorless, nearly scentless flower. A field of these berries in June produces a constant buzz like that of a massive hive. The honey isn't as white as that from clover, but it's easier to collect; it comes in shallow cups, while clover honey comes from deep tubes. The bees are busy before sunrise, and it takes a good shower to send them back. But clover blooms later and everywhere, and it’s the main source of high-quality honey. The red clover only gives up its nectar to the bumblebee's longer tongue; otherwise, the bee forage in our farming areas would be unbeatable. I don’t know what the famous honey from Chamouni in the Alps is made from, but it’s unlikely to be better than our best ones. The snow-white honey from Anatolia in Asian Turkey, which is regularly sent to Constantinople for the grand seignior and the women in his harem, comes from the cotton plant, which makes me think that white clover doesn’t grow there. White clover is native to our region; its seeds seem dormant in the soil, and applying certain boosters like wood ashes helps them germinate and grow.

The rose, with all its beauty and perfume, yields no honey to the bee, unless the wild species be sought by the bumblebee.

The rose, with all its beauty and fragrance, doesn’t produce any honey for the bee unless the bumblebee looks for the wild varieties.

Among the humbler plants let me not forget the dandelion that so early dots the sunny slopes, and upon which the bee languidly grazes, wallowing to his knees in the golden but not over-succulent pasturage. From the blooming rye and wheat the bee gathers pollen, also from the obscure blossoms of Indian corn. Among weeds, catnip is the great favorite. It lasts nearly the whole season and yields richly. It could no doubt be profitably cultivated in some localities, and catnip honey would be a novelty in the market. It would probably partake of the aromatic properties of the plant from which it was derived.

Among the simpler plants, I must not forget the dandelion that early dots the sunny slopes, where the bee lazily grazes, sinking down to its knees in the golden but not overly sweet pasture. The bee collects pollen from the blooming rye and wheat, as well as from the lesser-known flowers of Indian corn. Among weeds, catnip is the favorite. It lasts nearly the entire season and produces abundantly. It could definitely be profitably grown in some areas, and catnip honey would be a unique offering in the market. It would likely have the aromatic qualities of the plant it comes from.

Among your stores of honey gathered before midsummer you may chance upon a card, or mayhap only a square inch or two of comb, in which the liquid is as transparent as water, of a delicious quality, with a slight flavor of mint. This is the product of the linden or basswood, of all the trees in our forest the one most beloved by the bees. Melissa, the goddess of honey, has placed her seal upon this tree. The wild swarms in the woods frequently reap a choice harvest from it. I have seen a mountain-side thickly studded with it, its straight, tall, smooth, light gray shaft carrying its deep green crown far aloft, like the tulip-tree or the maple.

Among your stores of honey collected before midsummer, you might come across a card, or maybe just a square inch or two of comb, where the liquid is as clear as water, delicious, with a hint of mint. This comes from the linden or basswood tree, which is the most loved by bees in our forest. Melissa, the goddess of honey, has given her blessing to this tree. The wild swarms in the woods often gather a great harvest from it. I've seen mountainsides covered in it, with its straight, tall, smooth, light gray trunk holding its deep green crown high up, similar to the tulip tree or maple.

In some of the Northwestern States there are large forests of it, and the amount of honey reported stored by strong swarms in this section during the time the tree is in bloom is quite incredible. As a shade and ornamental tree the linden is fully equal to the maple, and, if it were as extensively planted and cared for, our supplies of virgin honey would be greatly increased. The famous honey of Lithuania in Russia is the product of the linden.

In some of the Northwestern states, there are large forests of it, and the amount of honey reported stored by strong swarms in this area while the tree is in bloom is quite incredible. As a shade and ornamental tree, the linden is just as good as the maple, and if it were planted and maintained as much, our supplies of pure honey would see a significant boost. The famous honey from Lithuania in Russia comes from the linden.

It is a homely old stanza current among bee folk that

It’s a familiar old verse shared among beekeepers that

“A swarm of bees in May
Is worth a load of hay;
A swarm of bees in June
Is worth a silver spoon;
But a swarm in July
Is not worth a fly.”

“A swarm of bees in May
Is worth a load of hay;
A swarm of bees in June
Is worth a silver spoon;
But a swarm in July
Isn’t worth anything.”

A swarm in May is indeed a treasure; it is, like an April baby, sure to thrive, and will very likely itself send out a swarm a month or two later: but a swarm in July is not to be despised; it will store no clover or linden honey for the “grand seignior and the ladies of his seraglio,” but plenty of the rank and wholesome poor man’s nectar, the sun-tanned product of the plebeian buckwheat. Buckwheat honey is the black sheep in this white flock, but there is spirit and character in it. It lays hold of the taste in no equivocal manner, especially when at a winter breakfast it meets its fellow, the russet buckwheat cake. Bread with honey to cover it from the same stalk is double good fortune. It is not black, either, but nut-brown, and belongs to the same class of goods as Herrick’s

A swarm in May is definitely a treasure; it’s like a baby born in April, sure to thrive, and will likely send out a swarm a month or two later. A swarm in July shouldn’t be overlooked either; it won’t gather any clover or linden honey for the “grand seignior and the ladies of his seraglio,” but it will collect plenty of the strong and wholesome nectar for the common man, the sun-kissed product of buckwheat. Buckwheat honey is the odd one out in this mix, but it has character and uniqueness. It definitely makes its presence known, especially during a winter breakfast when paired with a rustic buckwheat cake. Bread drizzled with honey from the same stalk is a double blessing. It isn’t black, but a rich nut-brown, and belongs to the same category of goods as Herrick’s.

“Nut-brown mirth and russet wit.”

“Brown joy and clever humor.”

How the bees love it, and they bring the delicious odor of the blooming plant to the hive with them, so that in the moist warm twilight the apiary is redolent with the perfume of buckwheat.

How the bees love it, and they bring the delightful scent of the blooming plant back to the hive with them, so that in the warm, humid twilight, the apiary is filled with the fragrance of buckwheat.

Yet evidently it is not the perfume of any flower that attracts the bees; they pay no attention to the sweet-scented lilac, or to heliotrope, but work upon sumach, silkweed, and the hateful snapdragon. In September they are hard pressed, and do well if they pick up enough sweet to pay the running expenses of their establishment. The purple asters and the goldenrod are about all that remain to them.

Yet clearly it isn't the scent of any flower that draws in the bees; they ignore the fragrant lilac or heliotrope, but busily gather from sumac, silkweed, and the detestable snapdragon. In September, they struggle and are lucky if they gather enough sweetness to cover the costs of their operation. The purple asters and goldenrod are pretty much all that’s left for them.

Bees will go three or four miles in quest of honey, but it is a great advantage to move the hive near the good pasturage, as has been the custom from the earliest times in the Old World. Some enterprising person, taking a hint perhaps from the ancient Egyptians, who had floating apiaries on the Nile, has tried the experiment of floating several hundred colonies north on the Mississippi, starting from New Orleans and following the opening season up, thus realizing a sort of perpetual May or June, the chief attraction being the blossoms of the river willow, which yield honey of rare excellence. Some of the bees were no doubt left behind, but the amount of virgin honey secured must have been very great. In September they should have begun the return trip, following the retreating summer south.

Bees will travel three or four miles to find honey, but it’s a big advantage to move the hive closer to good feeding areas, as has been done since ancient times in the Old World. Some innovative person, maybe inspired by the ancient Egyptians who had floating beehives on the Nile, has experimented with floating several hundred colonies north on the Mississippi, starting from New Orleans and moving along with the blooming season. This way, they experience a kind of endless May or June, mainly attracted by the blooms of the river willow, which produces exceptionally high-quality honey. Some bees likely got left behind, but the amount of fresh honey collected must have been considerable. By September, they should have started their journey back, following the summer's retreat south.

It is the making of wax that costs with the bee. As with the poet, the form, the receptacle, gives him more trouble than the sweet that fills it, though, to be sure, there is always more or less empty comb in both cases. The honey he can have for the gathering, but the wax he must make himself,—must evolve from his own inner consciousness. When wax is to be made, the wax-makers fill themselves with honey and retire into their chamber for private meditation; it is like some solemn religious rite: they take hold of hands, or hook themselves together in long lines that hang in festoons from the top of the hive, and wait for the miracle to transpire. After about twenty-four hours their patience is rewarded, the honey is turned into wax, minute scales of which are secreted from between the rings of the abdomen of each bee; this is taken off and from it the comb is built up. It is calculated that about twenty-five pounds of honey are used in elaborating one pound of comb, to say nothing of the time that is lost. Hence the importance, in an economical point of view, of a recent device by which the honey is extracted and the comb returned intact to the bees. But honey without the comb is the perfume without the rose,—it is sweet merely, and soon degenerates into candy. Half the delectableness is in breaking down these frail and exquisite walls yourself, and tasting the nectar before it has lost its freshness by contact with the air. Then the comb is a sort of shield or foil that prevents the tongue from being overwhelmed by the first shock of the sweet.

It’s the process of making wax that costs the bee. Just like the poet, the structure, the container, causes more trouble than the sweetness inside it, although there’s always a bit of empty comb in both cases. The honey can be gathered easily, but the wax has to be created from within — it must come from the bee’s own consciousness. When it’s time to make wax, the wax-makers fill themselves with honey and retreat to their chamber for a private moment of reflection; it resembles a solemn religious ceremony: they hold hands or connect in long chains that hang down in festoons from the hive's top and wait for the magic to happen. After about twenty-four hours, their patience pays off, and the honey transforms into wax, tiny scales of which are secreted from between the rings of the abdomen of each bee; these are collected, and the comb is constructed from them. It’s estimated that around twenty-five pounds of honey are needed to create one pound of comb, not to mention the time that’s wasted. This highlights the significance, from an economic standpoint, of a recent method that extracts honey while keeping the comb intact for the bees. But honey without the comb is like perfume without the rose — it’s just sweet and soon turns into candy. Half the enjoyment comes from breaking down those delicate and beautiful walls yourself and tasting the nectar before it loses its freshness from exposure to air. Then the comb serves as a sort of barrier that prevents the tongue from being overwhelmed by the initial sweetness.

The drones have the least enviable time of it. Their foothold in the hive is very precarious. They look like the giants, the lords of the swarm, but they are really the tools. Their loud, threatening hum has no sting to back it up, and their size and noise make them only the more conspicuous marks for the birds. They are all candidates for the favors of the queen, a fatal felicity that is vouchsafed to but one. Fatal, I say, for it is a singular fact in the history of bees that the fecundation of the queen costs the male his life. Yet day after day the drones go forth, threading the mazes of the air in hopes of meeting her whom to meet is death. The queen only leaves the hive once, except when she leads away the swarm, and as she makes no appointment with the male, but wanders here and there, drones enough are provided to meet all the contingencies of the case.

The drones have the toughest time. Their position in the hive is very unstable. They appear to be the giants, the rulers of the swarm, but they are really just tools. Their loud, intimidating buzz has no sting to back it up, and their size and noise make them easy targets for birds. They are all trying to win the favor of the queen, a deadly opportunity that is granted to only one. Deadly, I say, because it’s a well-known fact in the history of bees that mating with the queen costs the male his life. Yet day after day, the drones venture out, flying through the air in hopes of encountering her, knowing that meeting her means death. The queen only leaves the hive once, unless she’s leading a swarm, and since she doesn’t schedule a meeting with the males but roams around, there are enough drones around to handle all the possibilities.

One advantage, at least, results from this system of things: there is no incontinence among the males in this republic!

One advantage, at least, comes from this system: there is no sexual indiscretion among the men in this republic!

Toward the close of the season, say in July or August, the fiat goes forth that the drones must die; there is no further use for them. Then the poor creatures, how they are huddled and hustled about, trying to hide in corners and byways! There is no loud, defiant humming now, but abject fear seizes them. They cower like hunted criminals. I have seen a dozen or more of them wedge themselves into a small space between the glass and the comb, where the bees could not get hold of them, or where they seemed to be overlooked in the general slaughter. They will also crawl outside and hide under the edges of the hive. But sooner or later they are all killed or kicked out. The drone makes no resistance, except to pull back and try to get away; but (putting yourself in his place) with one bee a-hold of your collar or the hair of your head, and another a-hold of each arm or leg, and still another feeling for your waistbands with his sting, the odds are greatly against you.

Toward the end of the season, around July or August, the decree comes down that the drones must be eliminated; they are no longer needed. Then the poor creatures are huddled and pushed around, trying to hide in corners and side paths! There’s no loud, defiant buzzing now, only sheer terror grips them. They cower like hunted criminals. I’ve seen a dozen or more squeeze themselves into a small space between the glass and the comb, where the bees can’t reach them, or where they seem to be overlooked in the overall massacre. They also crawl outside and hide under the edges of the hive. But sooner or later, they all end up getting killed or kicked out. The drone makes no effort to fight back, except to pull away and try to escape; but (putting yourself in his position) with one bee grabbing your collar or hair, and another holding onto each arm or leg, and yet another probing your waistband with its sting, the odds are heavily against you.

It is a singular fact, also, that the queen is made, not born. If the entire population of Spain or Great Britain were the offspring of one mother, it might be found necessary to hit upon some device by which a royal baby could be manufactured out of an ordinary one, or else give up the fashion of royalty. All the bees in the hive have a common parentage, and the queen and the worker are the same in the egg and in the chick; the patent of royalty is in the cell and in the food; the cell being much larger, and the food a peculiar stimulating kind of jelly. In certain contingencies, such as the loss of the queen with no eggs in the royal cells, the workers take the larva of an ordinary bee, enlarge the cell by taking in the two adjoining ones, and nurse it and stuff it and coddle it, till at the end of sixteen days it comes out a queen. But ordinarily, in the natural course of events, the young queen is kept a prisoner in her cell till the old queen has left with the swarm. Later on, the unhatched queen is guarded against the reigning queen, who only wants an opportunity to murder every royal scion in the hive. At this time both the queens, the one a prisoner and the other at large, pipe defiance at each other, a shrill, fine, trumpet-like note that any ear will at once recognize. This challenge, not being allowed to be accepted by either party, is followed, in a day or two, by the abdication of the reigning queen; she leads out the swarm, and her successor is liberated by her keepers, who, in her time, abdicates in favor of the next younger. When the bees have decided that no more swarms can issue, the reigning queen is allowed to use her stiletto upon her unhatched sisters. Cases have been known where two queens issued at the same time, when a mortal combat ensued, encouraged by the workers, who formed a ring about them, but showed no preference, and recognized the victor as the lawful sovereign. For these and many other curious facts we are indebted to the blind Huber.

It’s an interesting fact that the queen is made, not born. If everyone in Spain or Great Britain were the children of one mother, we might need to figure out a way to turn an ordinary baby into a royal one, or else abandon the idea of royalty altogether. All the bees in the hive come from a common lineage, and the queen and the workers begin their lives as the same egg. The essence of royalty lies in the cell and in the food; the cell is larger, and the food is a special, nourishing jelly. In certain situations, like when the queen is lost and there are no eggs in the royal cells, the workers take the larva of a regular bee, enlarge the cell by incorporating the two next to it, and care for it until, after sixteen days, it emerges as a queen. Typically, though, in the natural course of things, the young queen is kept confined in her cell until the old queen leaves with the swarm. Later, the unhatched queen is protected from the reigning queen, who is eager to eliminate any royal offspring in the hive. During this time, both queens, one trapped and the other free, emit a challenge at each other with a sharp, trumpet-like sound that anyone can recognize. This challenge goes unanswered, leading to the reigning queen's abdication a day or two later; she leads out the swarm, while her successor is freed by her caretakers, who will eventually abdicate in favor of the next younger queen. When the bees have decided that no more swarms will emerge, the reigning queen is allowed to use her stinger on her unhatched sisters. There have been instances where two queens hatched at the same time, leading to a battle encouraged by the workers, who formed a circle around them but showed no favoritism, accepting the victor as the rightful ruler. We owe many of these fascinating facts to the blind Huber.

It is worthy of note that the position of the queen cells is always vertical, while that of the drones and workers is horizontal; majesty stands on its head, which fact may be a part of the secret.

It’s important to point out that queen cells are always positioned vertically, while drones and worker cells are placed horizontally; royalty is inverted, which might be part of the secret.

The notion has always very generally prevailed that the queen of the bees is an absolute ruler, and issues her royal orders to willing subjects. Hence Napoleon the First sprinkled the symbolic bees over the imperial mantle that bore the arms of his dynasty; and in the country of the Pharaohs the bee was used as the emblem of a people sweetly submissive to the orders of its king. But the fact is, a swarm of bees is an absolute democracy, and kings and despots can find no warrant in their example. The power and authority are entirely vested in the great mass, the workers. They furnish all the brains and foresight of the colony, and administer its affairs. Their word is law, and both king and queen must obey. They regulate the swarming, and give the signal for the swarm to issue from the hive; they select and make ready the tree in the woods and conduct the queen to it.

The idea has always been commonly accepted that the queen bee is an absolute ruler who gives royal orders to her obedient subjects. This is why Napoleon the First decorated his imperial mantle with symbolic bees that represented his dynasty; in ancient Egypt, the bee served as a symbol of a people that gently followed their king’s commands. However, the truth is that a swarm of bees operates as a complete democracy, and neither kings nor tyrants can draw authority from their example. The power and decision-making lie solely with the majority, the worker bees. They provide all the intelligence and planning for the colony and manage its operations. Their word is law, and both the king and queen must follow it. They control the swarming process, signal when it's time for the swarm to leave the hive, choose and prepare a tree in the woods, and guide the queen to it.

The peculiar office and sacredness of the queen consists in the fact that she is the mother of the swarm, and the bees love and cherish her as a mother and not as a sovereign. She is the sole female bee in the hive, and the swarm clings to her because she is their life. Deprived of their queen, and of all brood from which to rear one, the swarm loses all heart and soon dies, though there be an abundance of honey in the hive.

The unique role and significance of the queen is that she is the mother of the colony, and the bees love and care for her as a mother, not just as their leader. She is the only female bee in the hive, and the colony depends on her because she represents their life. Without their queen and any young bees to raise another, the colony loses its will to live and quickly dies, even if there is plenty of honey in the hive.

The common bees will never use their sting upon the queen; if she is to be disposed of, they starve her to death; and the queen herself will sting nothing but royalty,—nothing but a rival queen.

The common bees will never use their sting on the queen; if they need to get rid of her, they let her starve. And the queen herself will only sting something that’s royal—only a competing queen.

The queen, I say, is the mother bee; it is undoubtedly complimenting her to call her a queen and invest her with regal authority, yet she is a superb creature, and looks every inch a queen. It is an event to distinguish her amid the mass of bees when the swarm alights; it awakens a thrill Before you have seen a queen, you wonder if this or that bee, which seems a little larger than its fellows, is not she, but when you once really set eyes upon her you do not doubt for a moment. You know that is the queen. That long, elegant, shining, feminine-looking creature can be none less than royalty. How beautifully her body tapers, how distinguished she looks, how deliberate her movements! The bees do not fall down before her, but caress her and touch her person. The drones, or males, are large bees, too, but coarse, blunt, broad-shouldered, masculine-looking. There is but one fact or incident in the life of the queen that looks imperial and authoritative: Huber relates that when the old queen is restrained in her movements by the workers, and prevented from destroying the young queens in their cells, she assumes a peculiar attitude and utters a note that strikes every bee motionless and makes every head bow; while this sound lasts, not a bee stirs, but all look abashed and humbled: yet whether the emotion is one of fear, or reverence, or of sympathy with the distress of the queen mother, is hard to determine. The moment it ceases and she advances again toward the royal cells, the bees bite and pull and insult her as before.

The queen, I say, is the mother bee; it’s definitely a compliment to call her a queen and give her royal authority, yet she’s a remarkable creature and looks every bit a queen. It’s a special moment to spot her among the mass of bees when the swarm lands; it sends a thrill through you. Before you’ve seen a queen, you wonder if this or that bee, which appears a bit larger than the others, could be her. But once you lay eyes on her, there’s no doubt. You know that is the queen. That long, elegant, shiny, feminine-looking creature can only be royalty. How beautifully her body tapers, how distinguished she appears, and how purposeful her movements are! The bees don’t bow down before her, but they gently caress and touch her. The drones, or males, are also large bees, but they are coarse, blunt, broad-shouldered, and masculine-looking. There’s only one moment in the queen’s life that seems imperial and authoritative: Huber says that when the old queen is held back by the workers and unable to destroy the young queens in their cells, she takes on a certain posture and makes a sound that freezes every bee in place and makes every head bow; while this sound lasts, not a bee moves, but all appear embarrassed and humbled. Yet whether this reaction is due to fear, reverence, or compassion for the distressed queen mother is hard to say. The moment the sound stops and she moves again toward the royal cells, the bees bite and pull at her and treat her as before.

I always feel that I have missed some good fortune if I am away from home when my bees swarm. What a delightful summer sound it is! how they come pouring out of the hive, twenty or thirty thousand bees, each striving to get out first! It is as when the dam gives way and lets the waters loose; it is a flood of bees which breaks upward into the air, and becomes a maze of whirling black lines to the eye, and a soft chorus of myriad musical sounds to the ear. This way and that way they drift, now contracting, now expanding, rising, sinking, growing thick about some branch or bush, then dispersing and massing at some other point, till finally they begin to alight in earnest, when in a few moments the whole swarm is collected upon the branch, forming a bunch perhaps as large as a two-gallon measure. Here they will hang from one to three or four hours or until a suitable tree in the woods is looked up, when, if they have not been offered a hive in the mean time, they are up and off. In hiving them, if any accident happens to the queen the enterprise miscarries at once. One day I shook a swarm from a small pear-tree into a tin pan, set the pan down on a shawl spread beneath the tree, and put the hive over it. The bees presently all crawled up into it, and all seemed to go well for ten or fifteen minutes, when I observed that something was wrong; the bees began to buzz excitedly and to rush about in a bewildered manner, then they took to the wing and all returned to the parent stock. On lifting up the pan, I found beneath it the queen with three or four other bees. She had been one of the first to fall, had missed the pan in her descent, and I had set it upon her. I conveyed her tenderly back to the hive, but either the accident terminated fatally with her, or else the young queen had been liberated in the interim, and one of them had fallen in combat, for it was ten days before the swarm issued a second time.

I always feel like I've missed out on something special if I'm not home when my bees swarm. It's such a lovely summer sound! They pour out of the hive, twenty or thirty thousand bees, each trying to be the first to escape! It's like when a dam breaks and water rushes out; a flood of bees fills the air, creating a swirling maze of black lines to see and a soft chorus of countless musical sounds to hear. They drift this way and that, sometimes clustering together, sometimes spreading out, rising, sinking, thickening around a branch or bush, then dispersing and gathering again at another spot, until they start settling down in earnest. In just a few moments, the whole swarm collects on a branch, forming a bunch about the size of a two-gallon jug. They can hang there for one to four hours, or until they find a suitable tree in the woods. If they haven’t been given a hive in the meantime, they take off again. When trying to hive them, if something happens to the queen, the whole process can fail. One day, I shook a swarm from a small pear tree into a tin pan, set the pan down on a shawl spread underneath, and placed the hive over it. The bees soon crawled up into it, and everything seemed fine for ten or fifteen minutes, until I noticed something was off; the bees started buzzing excitedly and dashing around confused, then they took flight and returned to the original hive. When I lifted the pan, I found the queen underneath it along with three or four other bees. She had been one of the first to fall, missed the pan when she descended, and I had ended up placing the pan on her. I carefully brought her back to the hive, but either the accident proved fatal for her, or another young queen had been set free in the meantime, and one of them fell during the fight, because it took ten days before the swarm came out again.

No one, to my knowledge, has ever seen the bees house-hunting in the woods. Yet there can be no doubt that they look up new quarters either before or on the day the swarm issues. For all bees are wild bees and incapable of domestication; that is, the instinct to go back to nature and take up again their wild abodes in the trees is never eradicated. Years upon years of life in the apiary seem to have no appreciable effect towards their final, permanent domestication. That every new swarm contemplates migrating to the woods, seems confirmed by the fact that they will only come out when the weather is favorable to such an enterprise, and that a passing cloud, or a sudden wind, after the bees are in the air, will usually drive them back into the parent hive. Or an attack upon them with sand or gravel, or loose earth or water, will quickly cause them to change their plans. I would not even say but that, when the bees are going off, the apparently absurd practice, now entirely discredited by regular bee keepers but still resorted to by unscientific folk, of beating upon tin pans, blowing horns, and creating an uproar generally, might not be without good results. Certainly not by drowning the “orders” of the queen, but by impressing the bees, as with some unusual commotion in nature. Bees are easily alarmed and disconcerted, and I have known runaway swarms to be brought down by a farmer plowing in the field who showered them with handfuls of loose soil.

No one, as far as I know, has ever seen bees looking for a new home in the woods. Still, there's no doubt that they scout for new places either before or on the day they swarm. All bees are wild and cannot be fully domesticated; they always retain the instinct to return to nature and take up residence in trees. Years spent in the apiary don't seem to make a significant difference in their eventual, complete domestication. The idea that every new swarm thinks about migrating to the woods is supported by the fact that they only leave when the weather is right for such a move. A passing cloud or a sudden gust of wind, once they’re airborne, will usually send them back into the original hive. Likewise, if they’re attacked with sand, gravel, loose dirt, or water, they will quickly change their plans. I wouldn't even rule out the seemingly silly practice—now totally dismissed by professional beekeepers—of banging on tin pans, blowing horns, and creating noise, which is still used by non-scientific folks. It might not stop the queen's “orders,” but it could grab the bees' attention with an unusual disruption in nature. Bees are easily startled and unsettled, and I've seen swarms that were about to fly off be driven back down by a farmer plowing a field who threw handfuls of loose soil at them.

I love to see a swarm go off—if it is not mine, and, if mine must go, I want to be on hand to see the fun. It is a return to first principles again by a very direct route. The past season I witnessed two such escapes. One swarm had come out the day before, and, without alighting, had returned to the parent hive,—some hitch in the plan, perhaps, or may be the queen had found her wings too weak. The next day they came out again and were hived. But something offended them, or else the tree in the woods—perhaps some royal old maple or birch, holding its head high above all others, with snug, spacious, irregular chambers and galleries—had too many attractions; for they were presently discovered filling the air over the garden, and whirling excitedly around. Gradually they began to drift over the street; a moment more, and they had become separated from the other bees, and, drawing together in a more compact mass or cloud, away they went, a humming, flying vortex of bees, the queen in the centre, and the swarm revolving around her as a pivot,—over meadows, across creeks and swamps, straight for the heart of the mountain, about a mile distant,—slow at first, so that the youth who gave chase kept up with them, but increasing their speed till only a foxhound could have kept them in sight. I saw their pursuer laboring up the side of the mountain; saw his white shirtsleeves gleam as he entered the woods; but he returned a few hours afterward without any clue as to the particular tree in which they had taken refuge out of the ten thousand that covered the side of the mountain.

I love watching a swarm take off—unless it’s mine, and if mine has to go, I want to be there to see the excitement. It’s a return to basics again through a very straightforward process. Last season, I saw two such escapes. One swarm left the day before but returned to the hive without landing—maybe something went wrong, or perhaps the queen found her wings too weak. The next day, they came out again and were caught. But something bothered them, or maybe there was a tree in the woods—perhaps a majestic old maple or birch, standing tall above the rest, with cozy, spacious, uneven chambers and passages—that was just too tempting; because soon they were seen filling the air over the garden, swirling around excitedly. Gradually, they began to drift over the street; in a moment, they separated from the other bees and, gathering into a tighter mass or cloud, off they went, a buzzing, flying vortex of bees, with the queen at the center, and the swarm revolving around her like a pivot—over meadows, across streams and swamps, heading straight for the heart of the mountain, about a mile away—starting slow enough that the young guy chasing them kept up, but speeding up until only a foxhound could follow them. I saw their pursuer struggling up the mountain; saw his white shirt sleeves shine as he went into the woods; but a few hours later he returned without any idea about which of the thousands of trees on the mountain side they had found shelter in.

The other swarm came out about one o’clock of a hot July day, and at once showed symptoms that alarmed the keeper, who, however, threw neither dirt nor water. The house was situated on a steep side-hill. Behind it the ground rose, for a hundred rods or so, at an angle of nearly forty-five degrees, and the prospect of having to chase them up this hill, if chase them we should, promised a good trial of wind at least; for it soon became evident that their course lay in this direction. Determined to have a hand, or rather a foot, in the chase, I threw off my coat and hurried on, before the swarm was yet fairly organized and under way. The route soon led me into a field of standing rye, every spear of which held its head above my own. Plunging recklessly forward, my course marked to those watching from below by the agitated and wriggling grain, I emerged from the miniature forest just in time to see the runaways disappearing over the top of the hill, some fifty rods in advance of me. Lining them as well as I could, I soon reached the hilltop, my breath utterly gone and the perspiration streaming from every pore of my skin. On the other side the country opened deep and wide. A large valley swept around to the north, heavily wooded at its head and on its sides. It became evident at once that the bees had made good their escape, and that whether they had stopped on one side of the valley or the other, or had indeed cleared the opposite mountain and gone into some unknown forest beyond, was entirely problematical. I turned back, therefore, thinking of the honey-laden tree that some of these forests would hold before the falling of the leaf.

The other swarm came out around one o'clock on a hot July day, and immediately showed signs of distress that worried the keeper, who, however, did neither throw dirt nor water. The house was on a steep hillside. Behind it, the ground rose for about a hundred yards at an angle of nearly forty-five degrees, and the thought of having to chase them up this hill, if we needed to, promised a serious test of stamina; it quickly became clear that their path was heading in that direction. Wanting to join the chase, I took off my coat and rushed ahead before the swarm was fully organized and moving. The route soon led me into a field of standing rye, every stalk towering over me. Charging forward recklessly, my movement marked for those watching from below by the swaying and thrashing grain, I broke through the small forest just in time to see the bees disappearing over the top of the hill, about fifty yards ahead of me. Keeping them in sight as best I could, I quickly reached the hilltop, completely out of breath and sweating everywhere. On the other side, the landscape opened up wide. A large valley spread out to the north, heavily wooded at its upper end and along its sides. It became clear right away that the bees had successfully escaped, and whether they had settled on one side of the valley or the other, or had actually crossed the opposite mountain and vanished into some unfamiliar forest beyond, was anyone's guess. I turned back, thinking of the honey-filled tree that some of those forests would hold before the leaves fell.

I heard of a youth in the neighborhood more lucky than myself on a like occasion. It seems that he had got well in advance of the swarm, whose route lay over a hill, as in my case, and as he neared the summit, hat in hand, the bees had just come up and were all about him. Presently he noticed them hovering about his straw hat, and alighting on his arm; and in almost as brief a time as it takes to relate it, the whole swarm had followed the queen into his hat. Being near a stone wall, he coolly deposited his prize upon it, quickly disengaged himself from the accommodating bees, and returned for a hive. The explanation of this singular circumstance no doubt is, that the queen, unused to such long and heavy flights, was obliged to alight from very exhaustion. It is not very unusual for swarms to be thus found in remote fields, collected upon a bush or branch of a tree.

I heard about a kid in the neighborhood who had better luck than I did in a similar situation. Apparently, he got ahead of the swarm, which was flying over a hill like mine, and as he got close to the top, hat in hand, the bees just showed up and surrounded him. Soon, he noticed them buzzing around his straw hat and landing on his arm; in what felt like no time at all, the entire swarm had followed the queen into his hat. Since he was near a stone wall, he calmly set his treasure down on it, quickly freed himself from the accommodating bees, and went back for a hive. The reason for this unusual event is probably that the queen, not used to such long and heavy flights, had to land out of exhaustion. It’s not uncommon for swarms to be found in remote fields, gathered on a bush or a tree branch.

When a swarm migrates to the woods in this manner, the individual bees, as I have intimated, do not move in right lines or straight forward, like a flock of birds, but round and round, like chaff in a whirlwind. Unitedly they form a humming, revolving, nebulous mass, ten or fifteen feet across, which keeps just high enough to clear all obstacles, except in crossing deep valleys, when, of course, it may be very high. The swarm seems to be guided by a line of couriers, which may be seen (at least at the outset) constantly going and coming. As they take a direct course, there is always some chance of following them to the tree, unless they go a long distance, and some obstruction, like a wood or a swamp or a high hill, intervenes,—enough chance, at any rate, to stimulate the lookers-on to give vigorous chase as long as their wind holds out. If the bees are successfully followed to their retreat, two plans are feasible,—either to fell the tree at once, and seek to hive them, perhaps bring them home in the section of the tree that contains the cavity; or to leave the tree till fall, then invite your neighbors and go and cut it, and see the ground flow with honey. The former course is more business-like; but the latter is the one usually recommended by one’s friends and neighbors.

When a swarm moves into the woods like this, the individual bees, as I've mentioned, don’t fly in straight lines like a flock of birds, but instead they circle around, like chaff in a whirlwind. Together, they create a humming, swirling mass about ten to fifteen feet across, staying just high enough to avoid obstacles, except when crossing deep valleys, in which case they may fly quite high. The swarm appears to be led by a line of scouts, which can be seen (at least initially) constantly coming and going. Since they take a direct route, there's always a chance of following them to the tree, unless they travel a long distance and encounter an obstruction, like a forest, swamp, or steep hill—enough chance, anyway, to encourage those watching to give a good chase as long as they can keep up. If the bees are successfully followed to their hiding place, two options are available—either to cut down the tree immediately and try to hive them, possibly bringing them home in the section of the tree that contains the cavity; or to leave the tree until fall, then gather your neighbors, cut it down, and watch the ground flow with honey. The first option is more practical; but the second is usually the one that friends and neighbors recommend.

Perhaps nearly one third of all the runaway swarms leave when no one is about, and hence are unseen and unheard, save, perchance, by some distant laborers in the field, or by some youth plowing on the side of the mountain, who hears an unusual humming noise, and sees the swarm dimly whirling by overhead, and, maybe, gives chase; or he may simply catch the sound, when he pauses, looks quickly around, but sees nothing. When he comes in at night he tells how he heard or saw a swarm of bees go over; and perhaps from beneath one of the hives in the garden a black mass of bees has disappeared during the day.

Maybe nearly a third of all the swarms that escape do so when no one is around, so they go unseen and unheard, except perhaps by some distant workers in the fields or by a young person plowing on the mountainside, who hears an unusual buzzing sound and sees the swarm faintly swirling above. They might give chase, or they might just catch the sound, pause, glance around quickly, but see nothing. When they come home at night, they share how they heard or saw a swarm of bees pass by; and maybe a dark mass of bees has vanished from under one of the hives in the garden during the day.

They are not partial as to the kind of tree,—pine, hemlock, elm, birch, maple, hickory,—any tree with a good cavity high up or low down. A swarm of mine ran away from the new patent hive I gave them, and took up their quarters in the hollow trunk of an old apple-tree across an adjoining field. The entrance was a mouse-hole near the ground. Another swarm in the neighborhood deserted their keeper, and went into the cornice of an out-house that stood amid evergreens in the rear of a large mansion. But there is no accounting for the taste of bees, as Samson found when he discovered the swarm in the carcass, or more probably the skeleton, of the lion he had slain.

They aren't picky about the type of tree—pine, hemlock, elm, birch, maple, hickory—any tree with a good hollow either high up or low down. A swarm of mine escaped from the new patent hive I gave them and settled in the hollow trunk of an old apple tree across a nearby field. The entrance was a mouse-sized hole near the ground. Another swarm in the area left their keeper and moved into the eaves of a shed located among the evergreens behind a large house. But you can't really explain the preferences of bees, as Samson discovered when he found the swarm in the carcass, or more likely the skeleton, of the lion he had killed.

In any given locality, especially in the more wooded and mountainous districts, the number of swarms that thus assert their independence forms quite a large per cent. In the Northern States these swarms very often perish before spring; but in such a country as Florida they seem to multiply, till bee-trees are very common. In the West, also, wild honey is often gathered in large quantities. I noticed, not long since, that some wood-choppers on the west slope of the Coast Range felled a tree that had several pailfuls in it.

In any area, especially in more forested and mountainous regions, the number of swarms that claim their independence is quite significant. In the Northern States, these swarms often die off before spring arrives; however, in a place like Florida, they seem to thrive until bee-trees are quite common. In the West, wild honey is frequently collected in large amounts. I observed recently that some loggers on the west slope of the Coast Range cut down a tree that had several buckets of honey in it.

One night on the Potomac a party of us unwittingly made our camp near the foot of a bee-tree, which next day the winds of heaven blew down, for our special delectation, at least so we read the sign. Another time, while sitting by a waterfall in the leafless April woods, I discovered a swarm in the top of a large hickory. I had the season before remarked the tree as a likely place for bees, but the screen of leaves concealed them from me. This time my former presentiment occurred to me, and, looking sharply, sure enough there were the bees, going out and in a large, irregular opening. In June a violent tempest of wind and rain demolished the tree, and the honey was all lost in the creek into which it fell. I happened along that way two or three days after the tornado, when I saw a remnant of the swarm, those, doubtless, that escaped the flood and those that were away when the disaster came, hanging in a small black mass to a branch high up near where their home used to be. They looked forlorn enough. If the queen was saved, the remnant probably sought another tree; otherwise the bees soon died.

One night on the Potomac, our group unknowingly set up camp near the base of a bee tree, which the next day was blown down by the winds, presumably for our enjoyment, or at least that's how we interpreted it. Another time, while sitting by a waterfall in the bare April woods, I spotted a swarm in the top of a large hickory tree. The previous season, I had noticed that the tree looked like a good spot for bees, but the leaves had hidden them from me. This time, my earlier intuition came to mind, and when I looked closely, there they were—bees coming and going through a large, irregular opening. In June, a fierce storm of wind and rain destroyed the tree, and all the honey was lost in the creek where it fell. I happened to pass through the area a few days after the tornado and noticed a small group of the swarm—those who had probably managed to escape the flood, along with those that were away when the disaster struck—clinging to a branch high up, where their home used to be. They looked pretty miserable. If the queen survived, the remaining bees likely searched for another tree; otherwise, they would have quickly perished.

I have seen bees desert their hive in the spring when it was infested with worms, or when the honey was exhausted; at such times the swarm seems to wander aimlessly, alighting here and there, and perhaps in the end uniting with some other colony. In case of such union, it would be curious to know if negotiations were first opened between the parties, and if the houseless bees are admitted at once to all the rights and franchises of their benefactors. It would be very like the bees to have some preliminary plan and understanding about the matter on both sides.

I’ve seen bees leave their hive in the spring when it was overrun with worms or when the honey was all gone; at those times, the swarm seems to drift around aimlessly, landing here and there, and maybe eventually joining another colony. If that happens, it would be interesting to know if they had any discussions beforehand and if the homeless bees are immediately given all the rights and privileges of their new hosts. It seems very likely that the bees would have some sort of plan and agreement in place about it on both sides.

Bees will accommodate themselves to almost any quarters, yet no hive seems to please them so well as a section of a hollow tree,—“gums,” as they are called in the South and West where the sweet gum grows. In some European countries the hive is always made from the trunk of a tree, a suitable cavity being formed by boring. The old-fashioned straw hive is picturesque, and a great favorite with the bees also.

Bees can adapt to almost any space, but they seem to prefer a section of a hollow tree—known as “gums” in the South and West where the sweet gum tree grows. In some European countries, the hive is always made from the trunk of a tree, where a suitable cavity is created by boring into it. The traditional straw hive is charming and also very popular with the bees.

The life of a swarm of bees is like an active and hazardous campaign of an army; the ranks are being continually depleted, and continually recruited. What adventures they have by flood and field, and what hairbreadth escapes! A strong swarm during the honey season loses, on an average, about four or five thousand a month, or one hundred and fifty a day. They are overwhelmed by wind and rain, caught by spiders, benumbed by cold, crushed by cattle, drowned in rivers and ponds, and in many nameless ways cut off or disabled. In the spring the principal mortality is from the cold. As the sun declines they get chilled before they can reach home. Many fall down outside the hive, unable to get in with their burden. One may see them come utterly spent and drop hopelessly into the grass in front of their very doors. Before they can rest the cold has stiffened them. I go out in April and May and pick them up by the handfuls, their baskets loaded with pollen, and warm them in the sun or in the house, or by the simple warmth of my hand, until they can crawl into the hive. Heat is their life, and an apparently lifeless bee may be revived by warming him. I have also picked them up while rowing on the river and seen them safely to shore. It is amusing to see them come hurrying home when there is a thunder-storm approaching. They come piling in till the rain is upon them. Those that are overtaken by the storm doubtless weather it as best they can in the sheltering trees or grass. It is not probable that a bee ever gets lost by wandering into strange and unknown parts. With their myriad eyes they see everything; and then their sense of locality is very acute, is, indeed, one of their ruling traits. When a bee marks the place of his hive, or of a bit of good pasturage in the fields or swamps, or of the bee-hunter’s box of honey on the hills or in the woods, he returns to it as unerringly as fate.

The life of a swarm of bees is like an active and dangerous military campaign; their numbers are constantly decreasing and replenishing. They face numerous challenges in the air and on the ground, along with some very close calls! A strong swarm during honey season typically loses about four to five thousand bees each month, or around one hundred and fifty each day. They struggle against wind and rain, get caught by spiders, are numbed by cold, crushed by animals, drowned in rivers and ponds, and face many other unknown ways of being cut off or disabled. In spring, the main reason for their mortality is the cold. As the sun sets, they often get chilled before they can make it back home. Many end up falling outside the hive, unable to enter with their loads. You can see them come back completely exhausted and drop helplessly into the grass right in front of their hive. Before they can rest, the cold has frozen them. In April and May, I go out and collect them by the handful, their baskets full of pollen, and warm them in the sun, in my house, or just with the heat of my hand, until they can crawl back into the hive. Heat is their lifeline, and an apparently lifeless bee can be revived by warming it. I’ve also picked them up while rowing on the river and gotten them safely to shore. It's funny to watch them rush home when a thunderstorm is approaching. They keep coming in until the rain hits them. Those that get caught in the storm probably find shelter in nearby trees or grass. It's unlikely that a bee ever gets lost by straying into unfamiliar territory. With their countless eyes, they see everything, and their sense of direction is very sharp—it's one of their main traits. When a bee marks the location of its hive, a good feeding spot in the fields or swamps, or a beekeeper's honey box in the hills or woods, it always returns to it with unerring accuracy.

Honey was a much more important article of food with the ancients than it is with us. As they appear to have been unacquainted with sugar, honey, no doubt, stood them instead. It is too rank and pungent for the modern taste; it soon cloys upon the palate. It demands the appetite of youth, and the strong, robust digestion of people who live much in the open air. It is a more wholesome food than sugar, and modern confectionery is poison beside it. Besides grape sugar, honey contains manna, mucilage, pollen, acid, and other vegetable odoriferous substances and juices. It is a sugar with a kind of wild natural bread added. The manna of itself is both food and medicine, and the pungent vegetable extracts have rare virtues. Honey promotes the excretions, and dissolves the glutinous and starchy impedimenta of the system.

Honey was a much more essential food for ancient people than it is for us today. Since they didn’t seem to know about sugar, honey likely served as their primary sweetener. It’s too strong and intense for modern tastes; it can quickly become overwhelming. It requires the appetite of youth and the hearty digestion of those who spend a lot of time outdoors. Honey is a healthier option than sugar, and modern sweets are almost toxic in comparison. In addition to grape sugar, honey contains manna, mucilage, pollen, acids, and other fragrant plant substances and juices. It’s a type of sugar with a sort of wild, natural bread mixed in. Manna itself serves as both food and medicine, and the strong plant extracts have unique benefits. Honey helps with digestion and breaks down the sticky and starchy substances in the body.

Hence it is not without reason that with the ancients a land flowing with milk and honey should mean a land abounding in all good things; and the queen in the nursery rhyme, who lingered in the kitchen to eat “bread and honey” while the “king was in the parlor counting out his money,” was doing a very sensible thing. Epaminondas is said to have rarely eaten anything but bread and honey. The Emperor Augustus one day inquired of a centenarian how he had kept his vigor of mind and body so long; to which the veteran replied that it was by “oil without and honey within.” Cicero, in his “Old Age,” classes honey with meat and milk and cheese as among the staple articles with which a well-kept farmhouse will be supplied.

Hence it makes perfect sense that for the ancients, a land flowing with milk and honey symbolized a place rich in all good things; and the queen in the nursery rhyme, who hung around in the kitchen eating “bread and honey” while the “king was in the parlor counting out his money,” was making a very smart choice. Epaminondas is said to have mostly eaten just bread and honey. One day, Emperor Augustus asked a centenarian how he had maintained his mental and physical vigor for so long; the veteran replied that it was due to “oil outside and honey inside.” Cicero, in his “Old Age,” lists honey alongside meat, milk, and cheese as some of the essential items that a well-stocked farmhouse should have.

Italy and Greece, in fact all the Mediterranean countries, appear to have been famous lands for honey. Mount Hymettus, Mount Hybla, and Mount Ida produced what may be called the classic honey of antiquity, an article doubtless in no wise superior to our best products. Leigh Hunt’s “Jar of Honey” is mainly distilled from Sicilian history and literature, Theocritus furnishing the best yield. Sicily has always been rich in bees. Swinburne (the traveler of a hundred years ago) says the woods on this island abounded in wild honey, and that the people also had many hives near their houses. The idyls of Theocritus are native to the island in this respect, and abound in bees—“flat-nosed bees,” as he calls them in the Seventh Idyl—and comparisons in which comb-honey is the standard of the most delectable of this world’s goods. His goatherds can think of no greater bliss than that the mouth be filled with honeycombs, or to be inclosed in a chest like Daphnis and fed on the combs of bees; and among the delectables with which ArsinoĂ« cherishes Adonis are “honey-cakes,” and other tidbits made of “sweet honey.” In the country of Theocritus this custom is said still to prevail: when a couple are married, the attendants place honey in their mouths, by which they would symbolize the hope that their love may be as sweet to their souls as honey to the palate.

Italy and Greece, along with all the Mediterranean countries, have always been known for their honey. Mount Hymettus, Mount Hybla, and Mount Ida produced what could be considered the classic honey of ancient times, which is undoubtedly as good as our finest products today. Leigh Hunt’s “Jar of Honey” mainly draws from Sicilian history and literature, with Theocritus providing the best references. Sicily has always been abundant in bees. Swinburne, the traveler from a century ago, noted that the woods on this island were full of wild honey, and the locals also kept many hives near their homes. The idyls of Theocritus reflect this, featuring numerous bees—“flat-nosed bees,” as he refers to them in the Seventh Idyl—and making comparisons where honeycomb is seen as the epitome of the most delightful things in life. His goatherds can’t imagine a greater joy than having their mouths filled with honeycombs or being locked in a chest like Daphnis and fed with bee combs; and among the treats that ArsinoĂ« offers Adonis are “honey-cakes” and other goodies made with “sweet honey.” In the land of Theocritus, this tradition is still said to exist: when a couple gets married, their attendants place honey in their mouths, symbolizing the hope that their love may be as sweet to their souls as honey is to the taste.

It was fabled that Homer was suckled by a priestess whose breasts distilled honey; and that once, when Pindar lay asleep, the bees dropped honey upon his lips. In the Old Testament the food of the promised Immanuel was to be butter and honey (there is much doubt about the butter in the original), that he might know good from evil; and Jonathan’s eyes were enlightened by partaking of some wood or wild honey: “See, I pray you, how mine eyes have been enlightened, because I tasted a little of this honey.” So far as this part of his diet was concerned, therefore, John the Baptist, during his sojourn in the wilderness, his divinity-school days in the mountains and plains of Judea, fared extremely well. About the other part, the locusts, or, not to put too fine a point on it, the grasshoppers, as much cannot be said, though they were among the creeping and leaping things the children of Israel were permitted to eat. They were probably not eaten raw, but roasted in that most primitive of ovens, a hole in the ground made hot by building a fire in it. The locusts and honey may have been served together, as the Bedas of Ceylon are said to season their meat with honey. At any rate, as the locust is often a great plague in Palestine, the prophet in eating them found his account in the general weal, and in the profit of the pastoral bees; the fewer locusts, the more flowers. Owing to its numerous wild-flowers, and flowering shrubs, Palestine has always been a famous country for bees. They deposit their honey in hollow trees, as our bees do when they escape from the hive, and in holes in the rocks, as ours do not. In a tropical or semi-tropical climate, bees are quite apt to take refuge in the rocks; but where ice and snow prevail, as with us, they are much safer high up in the trunk of a forest tree.

It was said that Homer was nursed by a priestess whose breasts produced honey; and that once, while Pindar was asleep, bees dropped honey on his lips. In the Old Testament, the food of the promised Immanuel was supposed to be butter and honey (there's a lot of doubt about the butter in the original text), so that he could discern good from evil; and Jonathan’s eyes were opened by eating some wild honey: “See, I pray you, how my eyes have been enlightened because I tasted a little of this honey.” Regarding this part of his diet, John the Baptist, during his time in the wilderness—his theology study days in the mountains and plains of Judea—had it pretty good. As for the other part, the locusts, or, to be more precise, the grasshoppers, not much can be said about them, although they were among the insects that the children of Israel were allowed to eat. They were likely not eaten raw but roasted in the most basic of ovens, a hole in the ground heated by building a fire in it. The locusts and honey might have been served together, as the Bedas of Ceylon are said to season their meat with honey. In any case, since locusts are often a great plague in Palestine, the prophet benefited from eating them for the greater good, as well as from the honey produced by the bees; fewer locusts mean more flowers. Because of its many wildflowers and flowering shrubs, Palestine has always been known as a great place for bees. They store their honey in hollow trees, just like our bees do when they escape from the hive, and in crevices in the rocks, unlike ours. In a tropical or semi-tropical climate, bees are more likely to take refuge in the rocks, but in icy and snowy conditions, like ours, they are much safer high up in the trunk of a forest tree.

The best honey is the product of the milder parts of the temperate zone. There are too many rank and poisonous plants in the tropics. Honey from certain districts of Turkey produces headache and vomiting, and that from Brazil is used chiefly as medicine. The honey of Mount Hymettus owes its fine quality to wild thyme. The best honey in Persia and in Florida is collected from the orange blossom. The celebrated honey of Narbonne in the south of France is obtained from a species of rosemary. In Scotland good honey is made from the blossoming heather.

The best honey comes from the milder regions of the temperate zone. The tropics have too many toxic plants. Honey from some areas in Turkey can cause headaches and vomiting, while the honey from Brazil is mainly used for medicinal purposes. The honey from Mount Hymettus is high quality because it comes from wild thyme. The finest honey in Persia and Florida is harvested from orange blossoms. The famous honey from Narbonne in the south of France is sourced from a type of rosemary. In Scotland, good honey is made from blooming heather.

California honey is white and delicate and highly perfumed, and now takes the lead in the market. But honey is honey the world over; and the bee is the bee still. “Men may degenerate,” says an old traveler, “may forget the arts by which they acquired renown; manufactures may fail, and commodities be debased; but the sweets of the wild-flowers of the wilderness, the industry and natural mechanics of the bee, will continue without change or derogation.”

California honey is white, delicate, and highly aromatic, now leading the market. But honey is still honey everywhere; and a bee is just a bee. “People may decline,” says an old traveler, “they may forget the skills that brought them fame; manufacturing may falter, and products may lose their quality; but the sweetness of wildflowers in the wild, and the hard work and natural methods of the bee, will always remain unchanged and unimpaired.”

II
SHARP EYES

Noting how one eye seconds and reinforces the other, I have often amused myself by wondering what the effect would be if one could go on opening eye after eye to the number say of a dozen or more. What would he see? Perhaps not the invisible,—not the odors of flowers or the fever germs in the air,—not the infinitely small of the microscope or the infinitely distant of the telescope. This would require, not more eyes so much as an eye constructed with more and different lenses; but would he not see with augmented power within the natural limits of vision? At any rate, some persons seem to have opened more eyes than others, they see with such force and distinctness; their vision penetrates the tangle and obscurity where that of others fails like a spent or impotent bullet. How many eyes did Gilbert White open? how many did Henry Thoreau? how many did Audubon? how many does the hunter, matching his sight against the keen and alert sense of a deer or a moose, or fox or a wolf? Not outward eyes, but inward. We open another eye whenever we see beyond the first general features or outlines of things,—whenever we grasp the special details and characteristic markings that this mask covers. Science confers new powers of vision. Whenever you have learned to discriminate the birds, or the plants, or the geological features of a country, it is as if new and keener eyes were added.

Noticing how one eye supports and enhances the other, I often find myself wondering what would happen if we could keep opening eye after eye, say, a dozen or more. What would we see? Probably not the unseen—like the scents of flowers or the germs floating in the air—nor the incredibly tiny details through a microscope or the incredibly distant views through a telescope. That would require not just more eyes but an eye designed with different lenses; yet wouldn’t he see with greater clarity within the natural limits of vision? Anyway, some people seem to have more eyes than others; they see with such intensity and clarity that their vision cuts through confusion and ambiguity where others' falls short like a spent bullet. How many eyes did Gilbert White open? How many did Henry Thoreau? How many did Audubon? How many does a hunter open when he matches his sight against the sharp instincts of a deer, moose, fox, or wolf? Not external eyes, but internal ones. We open another eye whenever we look beyond the basic outlines of things—whenever we understand the specific details and unique markings hidden beneath that surface. Science provides us with new vision capabilities. Whenever you learn to identify birds, plants, or the geological features of a place, it’s like gaining new and sharper eyesight.

Of course one must not only see sharply, but read aright what he sees. The facts in the life of Nature that are transpiring about us are like written words that the observer is to arrange into sentences. Or the writing is in cipher and he must furnish the key. A female oriole was one day observed very much preoccupied under a shed where the refuse from the horse stable was thrown. She hopped about among the barn fowls, scolding them sharply when they came too near her. The stable, dark and cavernous, was just beyond. The bird, not finding what she wanted outside, boldly ventured into the stable, and was presently captured by the farmer. What did she want? was the query. What but a horsehair for her nest which was in an apple-tree near by? and she was so bent on having one that I have no doubt she would have tweaked one out of the horse’s tail had he been in the stable. Later in the season I examined her nest, and found it sewed through and through with several long horsehairs, so that the bird persisted in her search till the hair was found.

Of course, you need to not only observe closely but also interpret what you see. The events in Nature happening around us are like written words that the observer must piece together into sentences. Or it’s like writing in code, and they need to figure out the key. One day, a female oriole was seen very focused under a shed where horse stable waste was dumped. She hopped around the barnyard chickens, scolding them harshly when they got too close. The stable, dark and cavernous, was just beyond her. Not finding what she wanted outside, the bird boldly went into the stable and was soon caught by the farmer. What was she after? The question was posed. What else but a horsehair for her nest, which was in a nearby apple tree? She was so determined to get one that I’m sure she would have pulled one from the horse's tail if he had been in the stable. Later in the season, I checked her nest and found it stitched all around with several long horsehairs, proving that the bird was persistent in her search until she found the hair.

Little dramas and tragedies and comedies, little characteristic scenes, are always being enacted in the lives of the birds, if our eyes are sharp enough to see them. Some clever observer saw this little comedy played among some English sparrows, and wrote an account of it in his newspaper; it is too good not to be true: A male bird brought to his box a large, fine goose feather, which is a great find for a sparrow and much coveted. After he had deposited his prize and chattered his gratulations over it, he went away in quest of his mate. His next-door neighbor, a female bird, seeing her chance, quickly slipped in and seized the feather; and here the wit of the bird came out, for instead of carrying it into her own box she flew with it to a near tree and hid it in a fork of the branches, then went home, and when her neighbor returned with his mate was innocently employed about her own affairs. The proud male, finding his feather gone, came out of his box in a high state of excitement, and, with wrath in his manner and accusation on his tongue, rushed into the cote of the female. Not finding his goods and chattels there as he had expected, he stormed around awhile, abusing everybody in general and his neighbor in particular, then went away as if to repair the loss. As soon as he was out of sight, the shrewd thief went and brought the feather home and lined her own domicile with it.

Little dramas, tragedies, and comedies, along with unique scenes, are always happening in the lives of birds if we pay close attention. A keen observer witnessed this amusing situation with some English sparrows and described it in a newspaper; it’s too entertaining not to be true: A male bird found a large, beautiful goose feather, a valuable treasure for a sparrow. After he placed his prize in his nest and celebrated it, he went off to find his mate. Seizing her opportunity, his female neighbor quickly sneaked in and grabbed the feather. Showing cleverness, instead of taking it to her own nest, she flew to a nearby tree and hid it in the fork of some branches, then returned home and acted like she was busy with her own tasks when the male returned with his mate. The proud male was upset to find his feather missing, left his nest in a huff, and angrily accused the female, rushing into her area. Not finding his precious feather there as he expected, he raged around, blaming everyone generally and his neighbor specifically, before leaving as if to retrieve what he lost. As soon as he was out of sight, the crafty thief fetched the feather back and used it to line her own nest.

I was much amused one summer day in seeing a bluebird feeding her young one in the shaded street of a large town. She had captured a cicada or harvest-fly, and, after bruising it awhile on the ground, flew with it to a tree and placed it in the beak of the young bird. It was a large morsel, and the mother seemed to have doubts of her chick’s ability to dispose of it, for she stood near and watched its efforts with great solicitude. The young bird struggled valiantly with the cicada, but made no headway in swallowing it, when the mother took it from him and flew to the sidewalk, and proceeded to break and bruise it more thoroughly. Then she again placed it in his beak, and seemed to say, “There, try it now,” and sympathized so thoroughly with his efforts that she repeated many of his motions and contortions. But the great fly was unyielding, and, indeed, seemed ridiculously disproportioned to the beak that held it. The young bird fluttered and fluttered, and screamed, “I’m stuck, I’m stuck!” till the anxious parent again seized the morsel and carried it to an iron railing, where she came down upon it for the space of a minute with all the force and momentum her beak could command. Then she offered it to her young a third time, but with the same result as before, except that this time the bird dropped it; but she reached the ground as soon as the cicada did, and taking it in her beak flew some distance to a high board fence, where she sat motionless for some moments. While pondering the problem how that fly should be broken, the male bluebird approached her, and said very plainly, and I thought rather curtly, “Give me that bug,” but she quickly resented his interference and flew farther away, where she sat apparently quite discouraged when I last saw her.

I was really entertained one summer day watching a bluebird feed her chick on a shaded street in a big town. She had caught a cicada or harvest-fly and, after smashing it on the ground for a bit, flew up to a tree and placed it in her young bird’s beak. It was a big bite, and the mother looked unsure if her chick could handle it, so she stood nearby, watching its attempts with concern. The young bird struggled hard with the cicada but couldn’t manage to swallow it, so the mother took it back and flew down to the sidewalk, where she broke it up even more. Then she offered it to him again, seeming to say, “Here, try it now,” and sympathized so much with his efforts that she mimicked many of his movements. But the giant fly was stubborn and looked comically too big for the little beak. The young bird fluttered around, crying, “I’m stuck, I’m stuck!” until the worried mother took the cicada again and flew it to an iron railing, where she landed on it with everything she had for about a minute. Then she offered it to her young one for a third time, but it was the same result as before, except this time the bird dropped it. However, she was quick and got to the ground as soon as the cicada did, picked it up again, and flew a short way to a high wooden fence, where she sat still for a bit. While trying to figure out how to break that fly, the male bluebird flew up to her and bluntly said, “Give me that bug,” but she quickly took offense at his interruption and flew further away, looking pretty discouraged when I last saw her.

The bluebird is a home bird, and I am never tired of recurring to him. His coming or reappearance in the spring marks a new chapter in the progress of the season; things are never quite the same after one has heard that note. The past spring the males came about a week in advance of the females. A fine male lingered about my grounds and orchard all that time, apparently waiting the arrival of his mate. He called and warbled every day, as if he felt sure she was within ear-shot and could be hurried up. Now he warbled half-angrily or upbraidingly, then coaxingly, then cheerily and confidently, the next moment in a plaintive, far-away manner. He would half open his wings, and twinkle them caressingly, as if beckoning his mate to his heart. One morning she had come, but was shy and reserved. The fond male flew to a knothole in an old apple-tree, and coaxed her to his side. I heard a fine confidential warble,—the old, old story. But the female flew to a near tree, and uttered her plaintive, homesick note. The male went and got some dry grass or bark in his beak, and flew again to the hole in the old tree, and promised unremitting devotion, but the other said, “Nay,” and flew away in the distance. When he saw her going, or rather heard her distant note, he dropped his stuff, and cried out in a tone that said plainly enough, “Wait a minute. One word, please,” and flew swiftly in pursuit. He won her before long, however, and early in April the pair were established in one of the four or five boxes I had put up for them, but not until they had changed their minds several times. As soon as the first brood had flown, and while they were yet under their parents’ care, they began another nest in one of the other boxes, the female, as usual, doing all the work, and the male all the complimenting. A source of occasional great distress to the mother bird was a white cat that sometimes followed me about. The cat had never been known to catch a bird, but she had a way of watching them that was very embarrassing to the bird. Whenever she appeared, the mother bluebird would set up that pitiful melodious plaint. One morning the cat was standing by me, when the bird came with her beak loaded with building material, and alighted above me to survey the place before going into the box. When she saw the cat she was greatly disturbed, and in her agitation could not keep her hold upon all her material. Straw after straw came eddying down, till not half her original burden remained. After the cat had gone away the bird’s alarm subsided, till presently, seeing the coast clear, she flew quickly to the box and pitched in her remaining straws with the greatest precipitation, and, without going in to arrange them, as was her wont, flew away in evident relief.

The bluebird is a bird that loves home, and I can’t get enough of him. His arrival or return in spring marks a fresh start in the season; things are never quite the same after you’ve heard that call. Last spring, the males showed up about a week before the females. A nice male hung around my yard and orchard during that time, seemingly waiting for his mate to arrive. He sang and chirped every day, as if he was sure she could hear him and would hurry over. Sometimes he sang in an annoyed or scolding way, then softly, then cheerfully and confidently, and the next moment he sounded wistful and distant. He would partially open his wings and flutter them gently, as if inviting his mate to join him. One morning, she finally arrived but was shy and reserved. The eager male flew to a knothole in an old apple tree, coaxing her to his side. I heard a lovely, intimate warble—the same old story. But the female flew to a nearby tree and gave a sad, yearning note. The male flew off, grabbed some dry grass or bark in his beak, and returned to the hole in the old tree, promising unwavering devotion. But the female said, “No,” and flew away into the distance. When he noticed her leaving, or rather heard her distant call, he dropped his materials and called out in a tone that clearly said, “Wait a minute. Just one word, please,” and quickly chased after her. He won her over soon enough, and by early April, the pair had settled into one of the four or five boxes I had put up for them, but not before changing their minds several times. Once the first brood had flown away—while they were still under their parents' care—they started building another nest in one of the other boxes, with the female doing all the work as usual, and the male providing all the praise. A recurring source of distress for the mother bird was a white cat that sometimes followed me around. The cat had never caught a bird, but her way of watching them made the birds uneasy. Whenever she showed up, the mother bluebird would let out that sad, melodious cry. One morning, the cat was right by me when the bird arrived with her beak full of building materials and landed above me to check out the area before going into the box. When she spotted the cat, she got really flustered and lost her grip on most of her materials. Straw after straw fell to the ground until she had less than half of her original load left. Once the cat was gone, the bird calmed down enough that, seeing things were clear, she quickly flew to the box and hurriedly tossed her remaining straws inside, without taking the time to arrange them as she usually did, and flew away, clearly relieved.

In the cavity of an apple-tree but a few yards off, and much nearer the house than they usually build, a pair of high-holes, or golden-shafted woodpeckers, took up their abode. A knothole which led to the decayed interior was enlarged, the live wood being cut away as clean as a squirrel would have done it. The inside preparations I could not witness, but day after day, as I passed near, I heard the bird hammering away, evidently beating down obstructions and shaping and enlarging the cavity. The chips were not brought out, but were used rather to floor the interior. The woodpeckers are not nest-builders, but rather nest-carvers.

In the hollow of an apple tree just a few yards away, and much closer to the house than they normally build, a pair of golden-shafted woodpeckers settled in. They enlarged a knothole that led to the decayed center, cutting away the live wood as cleanly as a squirrel would. I couldn't see the inside work, but day after day, as I passed by, I heard the birds hammering away, clearly breaking down barriers and shaping and enlarging the hollow. They didn't bring the chips outside; instead, they used them to create a floor inside. Woodpeckers don’t build nests; they carve them.

The time seemed very short before the voices of the young were heard in the heart of the old tree,—at first feebly, but waxing stronger day by day until they could be heard many rods distant. When I put my hand upon the trunk of the tree, they would set up an eager, expectant chattering; but if I climbed up it toward the opening, they soon detected the unusual sound and would hush quickly, only now and then uttering a warning note. Long before they were fully fledged they clambered up to the orifice to receive their food. As but one could stand in the opening at a time, there was a good deal of elbowing and struggling for this position. It was a very desirable one aside from the advantages it had when food was served; it looked out upon the great, shining world, into which the young birds seemed never tired of gazing. The fresh air must have been a consideration also, for the interior of a high-hole’s dwelling is not sweet. When the parent birds came with food, the young one in the opening did not get it all, but after he had received a portion, either on his own motion or on a hint from the old one, he would give place to the one behind him. Still, one bird evidently outstripped his fellows, and in the race of life was two or three days in advance of them. His voice was loudest and his head oftenest at the window. But I noticed that, when he had kept the position too long, the others evidently made it uncomfortable in his rear, and, after “fidgeting” about awhile, he would be compelled to “back down.” But retaliation was then easy, and I fear his mates spent few easy moments at that lookout. They would close their eyes and slide back into the cavity as if the world had suddenly lost all its charms for them.

The time felt really short before the sounds of the young birds were heard in the heart of the old tree—at first weak, but getting louder every day until you could hear them from far away. When I placed my hand on the trunk of the tree, they would start chattering eagerly; but if I climbed up toward the opening, they quickly noticed the unusual sound and would fall silent, only occasionally giving a warning call. Long before they had all their feathers, they scrambled up to the opening to get their food. Since only one could fit in the opening at a time, there was a lot of pushing and shoving to get that spot. It was a highly sought-after position besides the benefits during feeding; it looked out onto the vast, bright world, which the young birds seemed to never get tired of watching. The fresh air must have been another factor since the inside of a high-hole’s home is not pleasant. When the parent birds arrived with food, the young one in the opening didn’t get everything, but after he received a portion, either on his own accord or with a hint from the adult, he would make room for the one behind him. Still, one bird clearly outpaced the others and was a couple of days ahead in the race of life. His voice was the loudest, and his head was often at the window. But I noticed that when he held the position too long, the others made it uncomfortable for him, and after “fidgeting” around for a while, he would have to “back down.” But getting back was easy, and I suspect his siblings spent few relaxed moments at that lookout. They would close their eyes and slide back into the cavity as if the world suddenly lost all its appeal for them.

This bird was, of course, the first to leave the nest. For two days before that event he kept his position in the opening most of the time and sent forth his strong voice incessantly. The old ones abstained from feeding him almost entirely, no doubt to encourage his exit. As I stood looking at him one afternoon and noting his progress, he suddenly reached a resolution,—seconded, I have no doubt, from the rear,—and launched forth upon his untried wings. They served him well, and carried him about fifty yards up-hill the first heat. The second day after, the next in size and spirit left in the same manner; then another, till only one remained. The parent birds ceased their visits to him, and for one day he called and called till our ears were tired of the sound. His was the faintest heart of all. Then he had none to encourage him from behind. He left the nest and clung to the outer bole of the tree, and yelped and piped for an hour longer; then he committed himself to his wings and went his way like the rest.

This bird was, of course, the first to leave the nest. For two days before that event, he stayed at the opening most of the time and called out with his strong voice nonstop. The parents hardly fed him at all, probably to push him to leave. One afternoon, as I watched him and noted his progress, he suddenly made a decision—supported, I'm sure, by those behind him—and took off on his untested wings. They worked well, carrying him about fifty yards uphill on his first try. The next day, the next biggest and most spirited bird left in the same way; then another, until only one was left. The parent birds stopped visiting him, and for one day he called out over and over until we were tired of the sound. He had the weakest spirit of all. Without anyone to encourage him from behind, he left the nest and clung to the outer trunk of the tree, yelping and chirping for another hour; then he finally took the plunge and flew off like the others.

A young farmer in the western part of New York, who has a sharp, discriminating eye, sends me some interesting notes about a tame high-hole he once had.

A young farmer in western New York, who has a keen and discerning eye, sends me some interesting notes about a domesticated high-hole he once had.

“Did you ever notice,” says he, “that the high-hole never eats anything that he cannot pick up with his tongue? At least this was the case with a young one I took from the nest and tamed. He could thrust out his tongue two or three inches, and it was amusing to see his efforts to eat currants from the hand. He would run out his tongue and try to stick it to the currant; failing in that, he would bend his tongue around it like a hook and try to raise it by a sudden jerk. But he never succeeded, the round fruit would roll and slip away every time. He never seemed to think of taking it in his beak. His tongue was in constant use to find out the nature of everything he saw; a nail-hole in a board or any similar hole was carefully explored. If he was held near the face he would soon be attracted by the eye and thrust his tongue into it. In this way he gained the respect of a number of half-grown cats that were around the house. I wished to make them familiar to each other, so there would be less danger of their killing him. So I would take them both on my knee, when the bird would soon notice the kitten’s eyes, and, leveling his bill as carefully as a marksman levels his rifle, he would remain so a minute, when he would dart his tongue into the cat’s eye. This was held by the cats to be very mysterious: being struck in the eye by something invisible to them. They soon acquired such a terror of him that they would avoid him and run away whenever they saw his bill turned in their direction. He never would swallow a grasshopper even when it was placed in his throat; he would shake himself until he had thrown it out of his mouth. His ‘best hold’ was ants. He never was surprised at anything, and never was afraid of anything. He would drive the turkey gobbler and the rooster. He would advance upon them holding one wing up as high as possible, as if to strike with it, and shuffle along the ground toward them, scolding all the while in a harsh voice. I feared at first that they might kill him, but I soon found that he was able to take care of himself. I would turn over stones and dig into ant-hills for him, and he would lick up the ants so fast that a stream of them seemed going into his mouth unceasingly. I kept him till late in the fall, when he disappeared, probably going south, and I never saw him again.” My correspondent also sends me some interesting observations about the cuckoo. He says a large gooseberry-bush standing in the border of an old hedge-row, in the midst of open fields, and not far from his house, was occupied by a pair of cuckoos for two seasons in succession, and, after an interval of a year, for two seasons more. This gave him a good chance to observe them. He says the mother bird lays a single egg, and sits upon it a number of days before laying the second, so that he has seen one young bird nearly grown, a second just hatched, and a whole egg, all in the nest at once. “So far as I have seen, this is the settled practice,—the young leaving the nest one at a time to the number of six or eight. The young have quite the look of the young of the dove in many respects. When nearly grown they are covered with long blue pin-feathers as long as darning-needles, without a bit of plumage on them. They part on the back and hang down on each side by their own weight. With its curious feathers and misshapen body, the young bird is anything but handsome. They never open their mouths when approached, as many young birds do, but sit perfectly still, hardly moving when touched.” He also notes the unnatural indifference of the mother bird when her nest and young are approached. She makes no sound, but sits quietly on a near branch in apparent perfect unconcern.

“Have you ever noticed,” he says, “that the high-hole never eats anything it can’t pick up with its tongue? At least, that was the case with a young one I took from the nest and tamed. He could extend his tongue two or three inches, and it was amusing to watch him try to eat currants from my hand. He would stick out his tongue and attempt to catch the currant; when that didn’t work, he would curl his tongue around it like a hook and try to jerk it up quickly. But he never succeeded; the round fruit would roll away every time. He never seemed to think about using his beak. His tongue was always at work, exploring everything he saw; he would investigate a nail hole in a board or any similar opening carefully. If you held him near your face, he’d quickly be drawn to your eye and would stick his tongue into it. This way, he earned the respect of several half-grown cats around the house. I wanted them to get used to each other, hoping it would reduce the risk of them hurting him. So, I’d sit with both on my lap, and the bird would soon notice the kitten’s eyes. He would carefully aim his beak like a marksman aims his rifle and stay that way for a minute before darting his tongue into the cat’s eye. The cats found this very mysterious: getting poked in the eye by something they couldn’t see. They quickly grew so terrified of him that they’d run away whenever they saw his bill pointing their way. He never swallowed a grasshopper, even when I placed it in his throat; he’d shake himself until it came out. His favorite snack was ants. He was never surprised by anything and never afraid of anything. He would chase the turkey gobbler and the rooster. He’d approach them with one wing raised as if to strike and shuffle across the ground while scolding them in a harsh voice. At first, I feared they might kill him, but soon realized he could handle himself. I would turn over stones and dig into ant hills for him, and he would lick up the ants so quickly it looked like a constant stream was going into his mouth. I kept him until late fall when he disappeared, probably heading south, and I never saw him again.” My correspondent also shares some interesting observations about the cuckoo. He mentions a large gooseberry bush at the edge of an old hedge row, in the middle of open fields, not far from his house, where a pair of cuckoos occupied it for two seasons in a row, and then, after a year’s break, for two more seasons. This gave him a great opportunity to observe them. He notes that the mother bird lays a single egg and sits on it for several days before laying the second, so he’s seen one young bird almost grown, one just hatched, and an unhatched egg all in the nest at the same time. “As far as I’ve seen, that’s the usual practice—the young leave the nest one at a time, numbering six or eight. The young ones look quite a bit like dove chicks in many ways. When almost grown, they are covered in long blue pin feathers as long as darning needles, without any plumage. They part on the back and hang down on each side due to their weight. With their unusual feathers and odd shapes, the young bird is far from pretty. They never open their mouths when approached, like many young birds do, but sit perfectly still, hardly moving when touched.” He also observes the unnatural indifference of the mother bird when her nest and young are approached. She makes no sound, simply sitting quietly on a nearby branch as if completely unconcerned.

These observations, together with the fact that the egg of the cuckoo is occasionally found in the nests of other birds, raise the inquiry whether our bird is slowly relapsing into the habit of the European species, which always foists its egg upon other birds; or whether, on the other hand, it is not mending its manners in this respect. It has but little to unlearn or to forget in the one case, but great progress to make in the other. How far is its rudimentary nest—a mere platform of coarse twigs and dry stalks of weeds—from the deep, compact, finely woven and finely modeled nest of the goldfinch or the kingbird, and what a gulf between its indifference toward its young and their solicitude! Its irregular manner of laying also seems better suited to a parasite like our cowbird, or the European cuckoo, than to a regular nest-builder.

These observations, along with the fact that cuckoo eggs are sometimes found in the nests of other birds, raise the question of whether our bird is reverting to the behavior of European species that always lay their eggs in other birds' nests, or if it's actually improving its behavior in this regard. It doesn't have much to unlearn or forget in one scenario, but it has a lot of progress to make in the other. How far off is its basic nest—a simple platform of rough twigs and dry weed stalks—from the intricate, well-crafted nests of the goldfinch or the kingbird? And what a contrast there is between its indifference toward its young and their attentive care! Its irregular nesting habits also seem more fitting for a parasite like our cowbird or the European cuckoo than for a typical nest-builder.

This observer, like most sharp-eyed persons, sees plenty of interesting things as he goes about his work. He one day saw a white swallow, which is of rare occurrence. He saw a bird, a sparrow he thinks, fly against the side of a horse and fill his beak with hair from the loosened coat of the animal. He saw a shrike pursue a chickadee, when the latter escaped by taking refuge in a small hole in a tree. One day in early spring he saw two hen-hawks, that were circling and screaming high in air, approach each other, extend a claw, and, clasping them together, fall toward the earth, flapping and struggling as if they were tied together; on nearing the ground they separated and soared aloft again. He supposed that it was not a passage of war but of love, and that the hawks were toying fondly with each other.

This observer, like most keen-eyed people, spots plenty of interesting things as he goes about his work. One day, he saw a white swallow, which is quite rare. He noticed a bird, a sparrow he thinks, fly into the side of a horse and grab some hair from the animal's loose coat. He saw a shrike chase a chickadee, which escaped by hiding in a small hole in a tree. One day in early spring, he saw two female hawks circling and screaming high in the sky, approach each other, extend a claw, and, holding them together, fall toward the ground, flapping and struggling as if they were tied together; as they got close to the ground, they separated and soared back up again. He thought it wasn't a fight but a display of affection, believing the hawks were playfully interacting with each other.

He further relates a curious circumstance of finding a hummingbird in the upper part of a barn with its bill stuck fast in a crack of one of the large timbers, dead, of course, with wings extended, and as dry as a chip. The bird seems to have died, as it had lived, on the wing, and its last act was indeed a ghastly parody of its living career. Fancy this nimble, flashing sprite, whose life was passed probing the honeyed depths of flowers, at last thrusting its bill into a crack in a dry timber in a hay-loft, and, with spread wings, ending its existence!

He also shares a strange story about finding a hummingbird in the upper part of a barn, with its bill stuck in a crack of one of the large beams, dead, of course, with its wings spread out and as dry as a chip. The bird seems to have died just as it lived, in flight, and its last act was a gruesome mockery of its lively existence. Imagine this quick, vibrant creature, whose life was spent exploring the sweet depths of flowers, ultimately wedging its bill into a crack in a dry beam in a hayloft, and, with wings wide open, ending its life!

When the air is damp and heavy, swallows frequently hawk for insects about cattle and moving herds in the field. My farmer describes how they attended him one foggy day, as he was mowing in the meadow with a mowing-machine. It had been foggy for two days, and the swallows were very hungry, and the insects stupid and inert. When the sound of his machine was heard, the swallows appeared and attended him like a brood of hungry chickens. He says there was a continued rush of purple wings over the “cut-bar,” and just where it was causing the grass to tremble and fall. Without his assistance the swallows would doubtless have gone hungry yet another day.

When the air is damp and heavy, swallows often dive for insects around cattle and moving herds in the field. My farmer describes how they surrounded him one foggy day while he was mowing in the meadow with a mowing machine. It had been foggy for two days, and the swallows were really hungry, while the insects were sluggish and inactive. When the sound of his machine could be heard, the swallows showed up and followed him like a bunch of hungry chicks. He mentions there was a constant flutter of purple wings over the “cut-bar,” right where it was making the grass shake and fall. Without his help, the swallows would have probably gone hungry for yet another day.

Of the hen-hawk, he has observed that both male and female take part in incubation. “I was rather surprised,” he says, “on one occasion, to see how quickly they change places on the nest. The nest was in a tall beech, and the leaves were not yet fully out. I could see the head and neck of the hawk over the edge of the nest, when I saw the other hawk coming down through the air at full speed. I expected he would alight near by, but instead of that he struck directly upon the nest, his mate getting out of the way barely in time to avoid being hit; it seemed almost as if he had knocked her off the nest. I hardly see how they can make such a rush on the nest without danger to the eggs.”

Of the hen-hawk, he has noticed that both the male and female participate in incubation. “I was quite surprised,” he says, “one time, to see how quickly they switch places on the nest. The nest was in a tall beech tree, and the leaves weren't fully out yet. I could see the head and neck of the hawk over the edge of the nest when I spotted the other hawk coming down through the air at full speed. I thought he would land nearby, but instead, he aimed directly for the nest, and his mate barely got out of the way in time to avoid being hit; it seemed almost as if he had knocked her off the nest. I can hardly understand how they can make such a rush at the nest without putting the eggs in danger.”

The kingbird will worry the hawk as a whiffet dog will worry a bear. It is by his persistence and audacity, not by any injury he is capable of dealing his great antagonist. The kingbird seldom more than dogs the hawk, keeping above and between his wings, and making a great ado; but my correspondent says he once “saw a kingbird riding on a hawk’s back. The hawk flew as fast as possible, and the kingbird sat upon his shoulders in triumph until they had passed out of sight,”—tweaking his feathers, no doubt, and threatening to scalp him the next moment.

The kingbird annoys the hawk like a small dog annoys a bear. It’s his persistence and boldness that matter, not the harm he can actually inflict on his much larger foe. The kingbird usually just follows the hawk, staying above and between its wings and making a big fuss; but my friend said he once “saw a kingbird riding on a hawk’s back. The hawk flew as fast as it could, and the kingbird sat on its shoulders in triumph until they were out of sight”—probably pulling at its feathers and threatening to attack any moment.

That near relative of the kingbird, the great crested flycatcher, has one well-known peculiarity: he appears never to consider his nest finished until it contains a cast-off snake-skin. My alert correspondent one day saw him eagerly catch up an onion skin and make off with it, either deceived by it or else thinking it a good substitute for the coveted material.

That close relative of the kingbird, the great crested flycatcher, has one well-known quirk: he doesn’t seem to think his nest is complete until it has a discarded snake skin in it. One day, my observant friend saw him excitedly grab an onion skin and fly away with it, either mistaking it for a snake skin or thinking it was a good alternative for the desired material.

One day in May, walking in the woods, I came upon the nest of a whip-poor-will, or rather its eggs, for it builds no nest,—two elliptical whitish spotted eggs lying upon the dry leaves. My foot was within a yard of the mother bird before she flew. I wondered what a sharp eye would detect curious or characteristic in the ways of the bird, so I came to the place many times and had a look. It was always a task to separate the bird from her surroundings, though I stood within a few feet of her, and knew exactly where to look. One had to bear on with his eye, as it were, and refuse to be baffled. The sticks and leaves, and bits of black or dark brown bark, were all exactly copied in the bird’s plumage. And then she did sit so close, and simulate so well a shapeless, decaying piece of wood or bark! Twice I brought a companion, and, guiding his eye to the spot, noted how difficult it was for him to make out there, in full view upon the dry leaves, any semblance to a bird. When the bird returned after being disturbed, she would alight within a few inches of her eggs, and then, after a moment’s pause, hobble awkwardly upon them.

One day in May, while I was walking in the woods, I came across the eggs of a whip-poor-will, since it doesn't actually build a nest—two oval, whitish spotted eggs resting on the dry leaves. My foot was only about a yard away from the mother bird before she flew off. I wondered what details a sharp observer might notice about the bird's behavior, so I returned to the spot many times to take a look. It was always a challenge to spot the bird among her surroundings, even though I stood just a few feet away and knew exactly where to look. You really had to focus your gaze and not get distracted. The sticks, leaves, and bits of dark brown bark were perfectly matched in the bird’s feathers. Plus, she sat so closely and blended in so well with the decaying wood or bark! I brought a friend with me twice, and while guiding his gaze to the spot, I noted how hard it was for him to see any resemblance to a bird, even when it was clearly in view on the dry leaves. After being disturbed, the bird would return and land just a few inches from her eggs, and then, after a brief pause, awkwardly shuffle onto them.

After the young had appeared, all the wit of the bird came into play. I was on hand the next day, I think. The mother bird sprang up when I was within a pace of her, and in doing so fanned the leaves with her wings till they sprang up, too; as the leaves started the young started, and, being of the same color, to tell which was the leaf and which the bird was a trying task to any eye. I came the next day, when the same tactics were repeated. Once a leaf fell upon one of the young birds and nearly hid it. The young are covered with a reddish down, like a young partridge, and soon follow their mother about. When disturbed, they gave but one leap, then settled down, perfectly motionless and stupid, with eyes closed. The parent bird, on these occasions, made frantic efforts to decoy me away from her young. She would fly a few paces and fall upon her breast, and a spasm, like that of death, would run through her tremulous outstretched wings and prostrate body. She kept a sharp eye out the meanwhile to see if the ruse took, and, if it did not, she was quickly cured, and, moving about to some other point, tried to draw my attention as before. When followed she always alighted upon the ground, dropping down in a sudden peculiar way. The second or third day both old and young had disappeared.

After the young birds showed up, all the cleverness of the mother bird came into action. I returned the next day, I think. The mother bird took off when I was just a step away from her, and as she did, her wings fanned the leaves until they rustled too; when the leaves moved, the young birds jumped up, and since they blended in with the leaves in color, it became really hard to tell which was which. I came back the next day, and the same tricks were repeated. At one point, a leaf fell on one of the young birds and almost covered it. The chicks were covered in reddish down, similar to a young partridge, and they quickly began to follow their mother around. When scared, they only made one jump and then settled down, completely motionless and looking pretty clueless, with their eyes shut. During these moments, the mother bird would desperately try to lure me away from her chicks. She would fly a few steps and then drop down dramatically, as if she were dying, with a shudder running through her trembling wings and body. Meanwhile, she kept a close watch to see if her trick worked, and if it didn’t, she quickly recovered and moved to another spot, trying to get my attention again like before. When being followed, she always landed on the ground in a sudden, distinctive way. By the second or third day, both the adult and young birds had vanished.

Whip-poor-will

The whip-poor-will walks as awkwardly as a swallow, which is as awkward as a man in a bag, and yet she manages to lead her young about the woods. The latter, I think, move by leaps and sudden spurts, their protective coloring shielding them most effectively. Wilson once came upon the mother bird and her brood in the woods, and, though they were at his very feet, was so baffled by the concealment of the young that he was about to give up the search, much disappointed, when he perceived something “like a slight mouldiness among the withered leaves, and, on stooping down, discovered it to be a young whip-poor-will, seemingly asleep.” Wilson’s description of the young is very accurate, as its downy covering does look precisely like a “slight mouldiness.” Returning a few moments afterward to the spot to get a pencil he had forgotten, he could find neither old nor young.

The whip-poor-will moves as clumsily as a swallow, which is as clumsy as a man in a bag, yet she manages to guide her young around the woods. The chicks, I think, move in jumps and quick bursts, their camouflage hiding them very well. Wilson once stumbled upon the mother bird and her chicks in the woods, and although they were right at his feet, he was so confused by the young ones' concealment that he was about to give up the search, feeling quite let down, when he noticed something “like a slight moldiness among the withered leaves, and, when he bent down, discovered it to be a young whip-poor-will, apparently asleep.” Wilson’s description of the young bird is spot on, as its downy covering does indeed look just like a “slight moldiness.” When he returned a few moments later to grab a pencil he had forgotten, he couldn’t find either the adult or the chicks.

It takes an eye to see a partridge in the woods, motionless upon the leaves; this sense needs to be as sharp as that of smell in hounds and pointers, and yet I know an unkempt youth that seldom fails to see the bird and to shoot it before it takes wing. I think he sees it as soon as it sees him, and before it suspects itself seen. What a training to the eye is hunting! to pick out the game from its surroundings, the grouse from the leaves, the gray squirrel from the mossy oak limb it hugs so closely, the red fox from the ruddy or brown or gray field, the rabbit from the stubble, or the white hare from the snow, requires the best powers of this sense. A woodchuck motionless in the fields or upon a rock looks very much like a large stone or boulder, yet a keen eye knows the difference at a glance, a quarter of a mile away.

It takes a keen eye to spot a partridge in the woods, still among the leaves; this ability needs to be as sharp as the sense of smell in hunting dogs, and still, I know a scruffy young guy who almost always manages to see the bird and shoot it before it can fly away. I think he notices it as soon as it notices him, and before it even realizes it's been seen. What amazing training hunting is for the eye! To distinguish the game from its surroundings, the grouse from the leaves, the gray squirrel from the mossy oak branch it clings to, the red fox from the reddish, brown, or gray field, the rabbit from the stubble, or the white hare from the snow demands the highest level of this skill. A woodchuck sitting still in the fields or on a rock looks a lot like a big stone or boulder, yet a sharp-eyed observer can tell the difference at a glance, even from a quarter of a mile away.

A man has a sharper eye than a dog, or a fox, or than any of the wild creatures, but not so sharp an ear or nose. But in the birds he finds his match. How quickly the old turkey discovers the hawk, a mere speck against the sky, and how quickly the hawk discovers you if you happen to be secreted in the bushes, or behind the fence near which he alights! One advantage the bird surely has, and that is, owing to the form, structure, and position of the eye, it has a much larger field of vision,—indeed, can probably see in nearly every direction at the same instant, behind as well as before. Man’s field of vision embraces less than half a circle horizontally, and still less vertically; his brow and brain prevent him from seeing within many degrees of the zenith without a movement of the head; the bird, on the other hand, takes in nearly the whole sphere at a glance.

A man has a sharper eye than a dog, a fox, or any wild animal, but his hearing and sense of smell aren’t as strong. However, he meets his match in birds. Just how quickly the old turkey spots a hawk, just a tiny dot against the sky, and how fast the hawk spot you if you’re hiding in the bushes or behind a fence where it lands! One clear advantage the bird has is that, because of the shape and position of its eyes, it has a much wider field of vision—it can probably see almost everywhere at once, including behind it. A man’s field of vision is less than half a circle horizontally and even less so vertically; his forehead and brain block his view of many degrees near the zenith without moving his head, while the bird takes in almost the entire sphere in a single glance.

I find I see, almost without effort, nearly every bird within sight in the field or wood I pass through (a flit of the wing, a flirt of the tail are enough, though the flickering leaves do all conspire to hide them), and that with like ease the birds see me, though unquestionably the chances are immensely in their favor. The eye sees what it has the means of seeing, truly. You must have the bird in your heart before you can find it in the bush. The eye must have purpose and aim. No one ever yet found the walking fern who did not have the walking fern in his mind. A person whose eye is full of Indian relics picks them up in every field he walks through.

I notice that I can almost effortlessly spot nearly every bird in the field or woods I walk through (a brief flash of a wing or a quick flick of a tail is enough, even though the rustling leaves tend to conceal them), and just as easily, the birds see me, even though the odds are definitely in their favor. The eye can only see what it's prepared to see. You have to have the bird in your heart before you can find it in the bush. The eye needs to have focus and intent. No one has ever found the walking fern without already having it in their mind. A person who is focused on Indian relics will notice them in every field they walk through.

One season I was interested in the tree-frogs, especially the tiny piper that one hears about the woods and brushy fields,—the hyla of the swamps become a denizen of the trees; I had never seen him in this new role. But this season, having hylas in mind, or rather being ripe for them, I several times came across them. One Sunday, walking amid some bushes, I captured two. They leaped before me, as doubtless they had done many times before; but though not looking for or thinking of them, yet they were quickly recognized, because the eye had been commissioned to find them. On another occasion, not long afterward, I was hurriedly loading my gun in the October woods in hopes of overtaking a gray squirrel that was fast escaping through the treetops, when one of these lilliput frogs, the color of the fast-yellowing leaves, leaped near me. I saw him only out of the corner of my eye and yet bagged him, because I had already made him my own.

One season, I became interested in tree frogs, especially the tiny piper you hear about in the woods and brushy fields—the hyla of the swamps now living in the trees; I had never seen them in this new role. But that season, with hylas on my mind, or rather feeling ready for them, I came across them several times. One Sunday, while walking through some bushes, I caught two. They jumped in front of me, just like they probably had many times before; but even though I wasn't looking for them or thinking of them, I recognized them quickly because my eyes were trained to spot them. On another occasion, not long after, I was hurriedly loading my gun in the October woods, hoping to catch a gray squirrel that was quickly escaping through the treetops when one of these tiny frogs, the color of the rapidly yellowing leaves, jumped near me. I saw him only out of the corner of my eye and still managed to catch him because I had already claimed him as mine.

Nevertheless the habit of observation is the habit of clear and decisive gazing: not by a first casual glance, but by a steady, deliberate aim of the eye, are the rare and characteristic things discovered. You must look intently, and hold your eye firmly to the spot, to see more than do the rank and file of mankind. The sharpshooter picks out his man, and knows him with fatal certainty from a stump, or a rock, or a cap on a pole. The phrenologists do well to locate, not only form, color, and weight, in the region of the eye, but also a faculty which they call individuality,—that which separates, discriminates, and sees in every object its essential character. This is just as necessary to the naturalist as to the artist or the poet. The sharp eye notes specific points and differences,—it seizes upon and preserves the individuality of the thing.

However, the habit of observation is about looking clearly and decisively: not through a quick glance, but by focusing steadily and intentionally. It's through this careful focus that we discover unique and characteristic things. You have to look closely and fix your gaze on a specific spot to see more than the average person does. The sharpshooter identifies his target with deadly accuracy from a stump, a rock, or even a hat on a pole. Phrenologists are right to associate not only form, color, and weight with the eye, but also a skill they call individuality—this quality that distinguishes and recognizes the essential character of every object. This is just as crucial for the naturalist as it is for the artist or the poet. A keen eye identifies specific details and differences—it captures and preserves the individuality of the subject.

Persons frequently describe to me some bird they have seen or heard, and ask me to name it, but in most cases the bird might be any one of a dozen, or else it is totally unlike any bird found on this continent. They have either seen falsely or else vaguely. Not so the farm youth who wrote me one winter day that he had seen a single pair of strange birds, which he describes as follows: “They were about the size of the ‘chippie;’ the tops of their heads were red, and the breast of the male was of the same color, while that of the female was much lighter; their rumps were also faintly tinged with red. If I have described them so that you would know them, please write me their names.” There can be little doubt but the young observer had, seen a pair of redpolls,—a bird related to the goldfinch, and that occasionally comes down to us in the winter from the far north. Another time, the same youth wrote that he had seen a strange bird, the color of a sparrow, that alighted on fences and buildings as well as upon the ground, and that walked. This last fact showed the youth’s discriminating eye and settled the case. From this and the season, and the size and color of the bird, I knew he had seen the pipit or titlark. But how many persons would have observed that the bird walked instead of hopped?

People often tell me about a bird they've seen or heard and ask me to identify it, but in most cases, the bird could be any one of a dozen species or is completely unlike any bird found in North America. They either saw it incorrectly or only caught a vague glimpse. Not so with the farm youth who wrote to me one winter day, saying he had spotted a single pair of unusual birds, which he described like this: “They were about the size of a chippy; the tops of their heads were red, and the breast of the male was the same color, while the female's was much lighter; their rumps were also faintly tinged with red. If I’ve described them well enough for you to recognize them, please let me know their names.” There’s little doubt that the young observer had seen a pair of redpolls—a bird related to the goldfinch that sometimes comes down to us in winter from the far north. Another time, that same youth wrote that he had seen a strange bird, the color of a sparrow, that landed on fences and buildings as well as on the ground and walked. This last detail showed the youth’s keen eye and confirmed the identification. Based on this, along with the season, size, and color of the bird, I knew he had seen a pipit or titlark. But how many people would have noticed that the bird walked instead of hopping?

Some friends of mine who lived in the country tried to describe to me a bird that built a nest in a tree within a few feet of the house. As it was a brown bird, I should have taken it for a wood thrush, had not the nest been described as so thin and loose that from beneath the eggs could be distinctly seen. The most pronounced feature in the description was the barred appearance of the under side of the bird’s tail. I was quite at sea, until one day, when we were driving out, a cuckoo flew across the road in front of us, when my friends exclaimed, “There is our bird!” I had never known a cuckoo to build near a house, and I had never noted the appearance the tail presents when viewed from beneath; but if the bird had been described in its most obvious features, as slender, with a long tail, cinnamon brown above and white beneath, with a curved bill, any one who knew the bird would have recognized the portrait.

Some friends of mine who lived in the countryside tried to describe a bird that built its nest in a tree just a few feet from their house. Since it was a brown bird, I would have thought it was a wood thrush, if they hadn't described the nest as so thin and loose that you could see the eggs from underneath. The most notable feature in their description was the striped look on the underside of the bird's tail. I was really confused until one day, while we were driving out, a cuckoo flew across the road in front of us, and my friends exclaimed, "There’s our bird!" I had never seen a cuckoo build near a house, and I hadn’t noticed how the tail looks from below; but if the bird had been described in its most distinctive characteristics—slender, with a long tail, cinnamon brown on top and white underneath, and a curved bill—anyone who knew the bird would have recognized the description.

We think we have looked at a thing sharply until we are asked for its specific features. I thought I knew exactly the form of the leaf of the tulip-tree, until one day a lady asked me to draw the outlines of one. A good observer is quick to take a hint and to follow it up. Most of the facts of nature, especially in the life of the birds and animals, are well screened. We do not see the play because we do not look intently enough. The other day I was sitting with a friend upon a high rock in the woods, near a small stream, when we saw a water-snake swimming across a pool toward the opposite bank. Any eye would have noted it, perhaps nothing more. A little closer and sharper gaze revealed the fact that the snake bore something in its mouth, which, as we went down to investigate, proved to be a small catfish, three or four inches long. The snake had captured it in the pool, and, like any other fisherman, wanted to get its prey to dry land, although it itself lived mostly in the water. Here, we said, is being enacted a little tragedy that would have escaped any but sharp eyes. The snake, which was itself small, had the fish by the throat, the hold of vantage among all creatures, and clung to it with great tenacity. The snake knew that its best tactics was to get upon dry land as soon as possible. It could not swallow its victim alive, and it could not strangle it in the water. For a while it tried to kill its game by holding it up out of the water, but the fish grew heavy, and every few moments its struggles brought down the snake’s head. This would not do. Compressing the fish’s throat would not shut off its breath under such circumstances, so the wily serpent tried to get ashore with it, and after several attempts succeeded in effecting a landing on a flat rock. But the fish died hard. Catfish do not give up the ghost in a hurry. Its throat was becoming congested, but the snake’s distended jaws must have ached. It was like a petrified gape. Then the spectators became very curious and close in their scrutiny, and the snake determined to withdraw from the public gaze and finish the business in hand to its own notions. But, when gently but firmly remonstrated with by my friend with his walking-stick, it dropped the fish and retreated in high dudgeon beneath a stone in the bed of the creek. The fish, with a swollen and angry throat, went its way also.

We think we have examined something closely until we're asked about its specific details. I believed I knew exactly what the leaf of the tulip tree looked like, until one day a woman asked me to draw its outline. A good observer quickly picks up on hints and follows through. Most of nature's facts, especially concerning the lives of birds and animals, are well hidden. We miss the action because we don't look closely enough. The other day, I was sitting with a friend on a high rock in the woods, near a small stream, when we saw a water snake swimming across a pool toward the opposite bank. Any casual observer would have noticed it, but nothing more. A closer look revealed that the snake had something in its mouth, which, as we went down to investigate, turned out to be a small catfish, about three or four inches long. The snake had caught it in the pool, and like any other fisher, wanted to get its prey to dry land, even though it primarily lived in the water. We remarked that here was a little tragedy unfolding that would have gone unnoticed by anyone but the most observant. The small snake had the fish by the throat, a prime position among all creatures, and held onto it with impressive strength. The snake knew that its best strategy was to get onto dry land as soon as possible. It couldn’t swallow its victim alive, and it couldn’t strangle it in the water. For a while, it tried to kill the fish by holding it up out of the water, but the fish became heavy, and every few moments its struggles would cause the snake’s head to go down. That wasn’t going to work. Squeezing the fish’s throat wouldn’t stop its breathing in that situation, so the clever snake tried to get ashore with it and, after several attempts, managed to land on a flat rock. But the fish was putting up a tough fight. Catfish don’t give up easily. Its throat was getting choked, and the snake's stretched jaws must have been sore—it was like a frozen open mouth. Then the watchers became very curious and leaned in closer, and the snake decided to retreat from view and finish the job according to its own plans. However, when my friend gently but firmly tapped it with his walking stick, it dropped the fish and slinked away in anger beneath a stone in the creek bed. The fish, with a swollen and distressed throat, went on its way too.

Birds, I say, have wonderfully keen eyes. Throw a fresh bone or a piece of meat upon the snow in winter, and see how soon the crows will discover it and be on hand. If it be near the house or barn, the crow that first discovers it will alight near it, to make sure he is not deceived; then he will go away, and soon return with a companion. The two alight a few yards from the bone, and after some delay, during which the vicinity is sharply scrutinized, one of the crows advances boldly to within a few feet of the coveted prize. Here he pauses, and if no trick is discovered, and the meat be indeed meat, he seizes it and makes off.

Birds, I must say, have incredibly sharp eyes. If you throw a fresh bone or a piece of meat onto the snow in winter, just watch how quickly the crows will find it and show up. If it’s close to the house or barn, the first crow to spot it will land nearby to make sure it’s not a trick. Then, it will fly away and soon return with a partner. The two crows will land a few yards from the bone, and after a bit of waiting, during which they carefully check the area, one of them will boldly approach within a few feet of the prize. Here it stops, and if no tricks are revealed and the meat is actually meat, it grabs it and takes off.

One midwinter I cleared away the snow under an apple-tree near the house and scattered some corn there. I had not seen a blue jay for weeks, yet that very day one found my corn, and after that several came daily and partook of it, holding the kernels under their feet upon the limbs of the trees and pecking them vigorously.

One winter, I cleared the snow away from under an apple tree close to the house and scattered some corn there. I hadn't seen a blue jay in weeks, but that very day one discovered my corn, and after that, several came every day to eat it, holding the kernels under their feet on the tree branches and pecking at them energetically.

Of course the woodpecker and his kind have sharp eyes, still I was surprised to see how quickly Downy found out some bones that were placed in a convenient place under the shed to be pounded up for the hens. In going out to the barn I often disturbed him making a meal off the bits of meat that still adhered to them.

Of course, woodpeckers and their relatives have sharp eyesight, but I was surprised to see how quickly Downy spotted some bones that were conveniently placed under the shed to be crushed up for the hens. While heading to the barn, I often interrupted him while he was having a meal off the bits of meat that were still stuck to them.

“Look intently enough at anything,” said a poet to me one day, “and you will see something that would otherwise escape you.” I thought of the remark as I sat on a stump in an opening of the woods one spring day. I saw a small hawk approaching; he flew to a tall tulip-tree, and alighted on a large limb near the top. He eyed me and I eyed him. Then the bird disclosed a trait that was new to me: he hopped along the limb to a small cavity near the trunk, when he thrust in his head and pulled out some small object and fell to eating it. After he had partaken of it for some minutes he put the remainder back in his larder and flew away. I had seen something like feathers eddying slowly down as the hawk ate, and on approaching the spot found the feathers of a sparrow here and there clinging to the bushes beneath the tree. The hawk, then,—commonly called the chicken hawk,—is as provident as a mouse or a squirrel, and lays by a store against a time of need, but I should not have discovered the fact had I not held my eye on him.

“Look closely at anything,” a poet once told me, “and you’ll notice things you would normally miss.” I thought about this as I sat on a stump in a clearing in the woods one spring day. I spotted a small hawk coming in; it flew to a tall tulip tree and landed on a thick branch near the top. We stared at each other. Then the bird revealed something I hadn’t seen before: it hopped along the branch to a small hole near the trunk, stuck its head inside, and pulled out a small object to eat. After munching on it for several minutes, it put the rest back in its stash and flew off. I noticed something like feathers slowly drifting down as the hawk ate, and when I went over to the spot, I found sparrow feathers scattered among the bushes below the tree. The hawk, often called the chicken hawk, is as resourceful as a mouse or a squirrel, saving food for times of need, but I wouldn’t have noticed this if I hadn’t kept my eye on it.

An observer of the birds is attracted by any unusual sound or commotion among them. In May or June, when other birds are most vocal, the jay is a silent bird; he goes sneaking about the orchards and the groves as silent as a pickpocket; he is robbing birds’-nests, and he is very anxious that nothing should be said about it, but in the fall none so quick and loud to cry “Thief, thief!” as he. One December morning a troop of jays discovered a little screech owl secreted in the hollow trunk of an old apple-tree near my house. How they found the owl out is a mystery, since it never ventures forth in the light of day; but they did, and proclaimed the fact with great emphasis. I suspect the bluebirds first told them, for these birds are constantly peeping into holes and crannies both spring and fall. Some unsuspecting bird had probably entered the cavity prospecting for a place for next year’s nest, or else looking out a likely place to pass a cold night, and then had rushed out with important news. A boy who should unwittingly venture into a bear’s den when Bruin was at home could not be more astonished and alarmed than a bluebird would be on finding itself in a cavity of a decayed tree with an owl. At any rate, the bluebirds joined the jays in calling the attention of all whom it might concern to the fact that a culprit of some sort was hiding from the light of day in the old apple-tree. I heard the notes of warning and alarm and approached to within eyeshot. The bluebirds were cautious and hovered about uttering their peculiar twittering calls; but the jays were bolder and took turns looking in at the cavity, and deriding the poor, shrinking owl. A jay would alight in the entrance of the hole, and flirt and peer and attitudinize, and then fly away crying “Thief, thief, thief!” at the top of his voice.

An observer of birds is drawn to any unusual sounds or activity among them. In May or June, when other birds are the most vocal, the jay stays quiet; he sneaks around the orchards and groves as silently as a pickpocket, robbing nests while trying to keep it under wraps. But in the fall, no one is quicker or louder to shout “Thief, thief!” than he is. One December morning, a group of jays found a little screech owl hidden in the hollow trunk of an old apple tree near my house. How they discovered the owl is a mystery, since it never comes out in the daytime, but they did, and they made a big deal out of it. I suspect the bluebirds tipped them off first because these birds are always checking out holes and crannies in both spring and fall. Some unsuspecting bird probably entered the hole, either looking for a place for next year's nest or scouting a safe spot for a cold night, and then rushed out with the news. A boy who unknowingly stumbles into a bear's den when Bruin is home couldn't be more shocked and alarmed than a bluebird would be if it found itself in a decayed tree with an owl. In any case, the bluebirds joined the jays in alerting everyone that something suspicious was hiding in the old apple tree. I heard their warning calls and got closer to take a look. The bluebirds were cautious, flitting around and making their unique twittering sounds, while the jays were bolder, taking turns peeking into the hole and mocking the poor, shrinking owl. One jay would land at the entrance, preen and peer in, then fly away yelling “Thief, thief, thief!” at the top of its lungs.

I climbed up and peered into the opening, and could just descry the owl clinging to the inside of the tree. I reached in and took him out, giving little heed to the threatening snapping of his beak. He was as red as a fox and as yellow-eyed as a cat. He made no effort to escape, but planted his claws in my forefinger and clung there with a grip that soon grew uncomfortable. I placed him in the loft of an outhouse, in hopes of getting better acquainted with him. By day he was a very willing prisoner, scarcely moving at all, even when approached and touched with the hand, but looking out upon the world with half-closed, sleepy eyes. But at night what a change! how alert, how wild, how active! He was like another bird; he darted about with wide, fearful eyes, and regarded me like a cornered cat. I opened the window, and swiftly, but as silent as a shadow, he glided out into the congenial darkness, and perhaps, ere this, has revenged himself upon the sleeping jay or bluebird that first betrayed his hiding-place.

I climbed up and looked into the opening, and could just barely see the owl clinging inside the tree. I reached in and pulled him out, not paying much attention to the menacing snapping of his beak. He was as red as a fox and had yellow eyes like a cat. He didn’t try to escape, but dug his claws into my forefinger and held on with a grip that quickly became uncomfortable. I put him in the loft of a shed, hoping to get to know him better. During the day, he was a very compliant prisoner, hardly moving at all, even when I came close and touched him, just looking out at the world with half-closed, sleepy eyes. But at night, what a difference! He was so alert, wild, and active! He was like a completely different bird; he flitted around with wide, fearful eyes and looked at me like a cornered cat. I opened the window, and quickly, but as silently as a shadow, he glided out into the welcoming darkness, and maybe by now, he has taken revenge on the sleeping jay or bluebird that first gave away his hiding spot.

III
STRAWBERRIES

Was it old Dr. Parr who said or sighed in his last illness, “Oh, if I can only live till strawberries come!” The old scholar imagined that, if he could weather it till then, the berries would carry him through. No doubt he had turned from the drugs and the nostrums, or from the hateful food, to the memory of the pungent, penetrating, and unspeakably fresh quality of the strawberry with the deepest longing. The very thought of these crimson lobes, embodying as it were the first glow and ardor of the young summer, and with their power to unsheathe the taste and spur the nagging appetite, made life seem possible and desirable to him.

Was it old Dr. Parr who said or sighed during his last illness, “Oh, if I can just make it to strawberry season!” The old scholar believed that if he could hold on until then, the berries would give him the strength to get through. No doubt he had turned away from medicines and unappetizing foods to the memory of the intensely fresh, vibrant quality of strawberries with deep yearning. Just the idea of those red fruits, symbolizing the first warmth and excitement of early summer, and their ability to awaken the senses and spark his appetite, made life feel attainable and worth living to him.

The strawberry is always the hope of the invalid, and sometimes, no doubt, his salvation. It is the first and finest relish among fruits, and well merits Dr. Boteler’s memorable saying, that “doubtless God could have made a better berry, but doubtless God never did.”

The strawberry is always the hope of the sick, and sometimes, no doubt, his salvation. It is the first and best treat among fruits, and it certainly deserves Dr. Boteler’s famous saying that “God could have made a better berry, but God never did.”

On the threshold of summer, Nature proffers us this her virgin fruit; more rich and sumptuous are to follow, but the wild delicacy and fillip of the strawberry are never repeated,—that keen feathered edge greets the tongue in nothing else.

On the brink of summer, Nature offers us this fresh fruit; richer and more luxurious ones will come, but the wild delicacy and thrill of the strawberry are never matched— that sharp, delicate edge is experienced in nothing else.

Let me not be afraid of overpraising it, but probe and probe for words to hint its surprising virtues. We may well celebrate it with festivals and music. It has that indescribable quality of all first things,—that shy, uncloying, provoking barbed sweetness. It is eager and sanguine as youth. It is born of the copious dews, the fragrant nights, the tender skies, the plentiful rains of the early season. The singing of birds is in it, and the health and frolic of lusty Nature. It is the product of liquid May touched by the June sun. It has the tartness, the briskness, the unruliness of spring, and the aroma and intensity of summer.

Let me not hold back in praising it, but search for words to express its amazing qualities. We should definitely celebrate it with festivals and music. It has that indescribable quality common to all first experiences—an innocent, refreshing, intriguing sweetness. It’s as eager and hopeful as youth. It comes from the abundant dews, the fragrant nights, the gentle skies, and the plentiful rains of the early season. It carries the songs of birds and the vitality and joy of lively Nature. It’s the result of the refreshing May touched by the June sun. It has the tanginess, the liveliness, the wildness of spring, along with the scent and richness of summer.

Oh, the strawberry days! how vividly they come back to one! The smell of clover in the fields, of blooming rye on the hills, of the wild grape beside the woods, and of the sweet honeysuckle and the spirĂŠa about the house. The first hot, moist days. The daisies and the buttercups; the songs of the birds, their first reckless jollity and love-making over; the full tender foliage of the trees; the bees swarming, and the air strung with resonant musical chords. The time of the sweetest and most, succulent grass, when the cows come home with aching udders. Indeed, the strawberry belongs to the juiciest time of the year.

Oh, the strawberry days! How vividly they come back to mind! The scent of clover in the fields, blooming rye on the hills, wild grapes by the woods, and the sweet honeysuckle and spirĂŠa around the house. The first hot, humid days. The daisies and buttercups; the songs of the birds, their carefree joy and courtship all around; the lush green leaves of the trees; the bees buzzing, and the air filled with harmonious melodies. The time of the sweetest and most tender grass, when the cows come home with full udders. Truly, strawberries belong to the juiciest time of the year.

What a challenge it is to the taste! how it bites back again! and is there any other sound like the snap and crackle with which it salutes the ear on being plucked from the stems? It is a threat to one sense that the other is soon to verify. It snaps to the ear as it smacks to the tongue. All other berries are tame beside it.

What a challenge it is to the taste! How it bites back! Is there any other sound like the snap and crackle that greets your ears when it’s plucked from the stems? It’s a warning to one sense that the other will soon confirm it. It snaps in your ears just like it pops on your tongue. All other berries seem tame compared to it.

The plant is almost an evergreen; it loves the coverlid of the snow, and will keep fresh through the severest winters with a slight protection. The frost leaves its virtues in it. The berry is a kind of vegetable snow. How cool, how tonic, how melting, and how perishable! It is almost as easy to keep frost. Heat kills it, and sugar quickly breaks up its cells.

The plant is nearly evergreen; it enjoys the blanket of snow and stays fresh even during the harshest winters with a little protection. The frost enhances its qualities. The berry is like a type of vegetable snow. How refreshing, how invigorating, how delicate, and how short-lived! It’s almost as easy to preserve frost. Heat destroys it, and sugar quickly dissolves its cells.

Is there anything like the odor of strawberries? The next best thing to tasting them is to smell them; one may put his nose to the dish while the fruit is yet too rare and choice for his fingers. Touch not and taste not, but take a good smell and go mad! Last fall I potted some of the Downer, and in the winter grew them in the house. In March the berries were ripe, only four or five on a plant, just enough, all told, to make one consider whether it were not worth while to kill off the rest of the household, so that the berries need not be divided. But if every tongue could not have a feast, every nose banqueted daily upon them. They filled the house with perfume. The Downer is remarkable in this respect. Grown in the open field, it surpasses in its odor any strawberry of my acquaintance. And it is scarcely less agreeable to the taste. It is a very beautiful berry to look upon, round, light pink, with a delicate, fine-grained expression. Some berries shine, the Downer glows as if there were a red bloom upon it. Its core is firm and white, its skin thick and easily bruised, which makes it a poor market berry, but, with its high flavor and productiveness, an admirable one for home use. It seems to be as easily grown as the Wilson, while it is much more palatable. The great trouble with the Wilson, as everybody knows, is its rank acidity. When it first comes, it is difficult to eat it without making faces. It is crabbed and acrimonious. Like some persons, the Wilson will not ripen and sweeten till its old age. Its largest and finest crop, if allowed to remain on the vines, will soften and fail unregenerated, or with all its sins upon it. But wait till toward the end of the season, after the plant gets over its hurry and takes time to ripen its fruit. The berry will then face the sun for days, and, if the weather is not too wet, instead of softening will turn dark and grow rich. Out of its crabbedness and spitefulness come the finest, choicest flavors. It is an astonishing berry. It lays hold of the taste in a way that the aristocratic berries, like the Jocunda or the Triumph, cannot approximate to. Its quality is as penetrating as that of ants and wasps, but sweet. It is, indeed, a wild bee turned into a berry, with the sting mollified and the honey disguised. A quart of these rare-ripes I venture to say contains more of the peculiar virtue and excellence of the strawberry kind than can be had in twice the same quantity of any other cultivated variety. Take these berries in a bowl of rich milk with some bread,—ah, what a dish!—too good to set before a king! I suspect this was the food of Adam in Paradise, only Adam did not have the Wilson strawberry; he had the wild strawberry that Eve plucked in their hill-meadow and “hulled” with her own hands, and that, take it all in all, even surpasses the late-ripened Wilson.

Is there anything like the smell of strawberries? The next best thing to tasting them is smelling them; you can put your nose to the dish while the fruit is still too rare and special to touch. Don’t touch or taste, but take a good whiff and go wild! Last fall, I potted some Downer strawberries and grew them inside during the winter. By March, the berries were ripe, with only four or five on each plant, just enough to make you think about getting rid of the rest of the household so the berries wouldn’t have to be shared. But if everyone couldn’t have a feast, at least every nose enjoyed them daily. They filled the house with their fragrance. The Downer is impressive in this way. Grown outdoors, it has a smell that beats any strawberry I know. Its taste is hardly less enjoyable. They’re beautiful to look at—round, light pink, with a delicate, fine-grained look. Some berries shine, but the Downer glows as if it has a red blush. Its core is firm and white, its skin thick and easily bruised, which makes it a poor choice for the market, but with its great flavor and productivity, it’s perfect for home use. It seems as easy to grow as the Wilson, but it’s much tastier. The main issue with the Wilson, as everyone knows, is its intense acidity. When it first appears, it’s hard to eat without making faces. It’s sharp and bitter. Like some people, the Wilson won’t ripen and sweeten until it’s older. Its largest and best crop, if left on the vine, will soften and spoil without maturing, or remains flawed. But wait until the end of the season, after the plant slows down and takes its time ripening the fruit. The berry will then face the sun for days, and if the weather isn’t too wet, instead of softening, it will turn dark and get richer. Out of its bitterness and sourness come the best, most refined flavors. It’s an incredible berry. It grabs your taste in a way that the fancier berries, like the Jocunda or the Triumph, can’t match. Its quality is as intense as that of ants and wasps, but sweet. It’s truly like a wild bee transformed into a berry, with the sting softened and the honey hidden. I dare say a quart of these perfectly ripe berries has more of the unique goodness and excellence of strawberries than you’d get from twice that amount of any other cultivated variety. Enjoy these berries in a bowl of rich milk with some bread—oh, what a dish!—too good to serve to a king! I suspect this was Adam’s food in Paradise; he just didn’t have the Wilson strawberry; he had the wild strawberry that Eve picked in their hill-meadow and “hulled” with her hands, which, all things considered, even surpasses the late-ripened Wilson.

Adam is still extant in the taste and the appetite of most country boys; lives there a country boy who does not like wild strawberries and milk,—yea, prefer it to any other known dish? I am not thinking of a dessert of strawberries and cream; this the city boy may have, too, after a sort; but bread-and-milk, with the addition of wild strawberries, is peculiarly a country dish, and is to the taste what a wild bird’s song is to the ear. When I was a lad, and went afield with my hoe or with the cows, during the strawberry season, I was sure to return at meal-time with a lining of berries in the top of my straw hat. They were my daily food, and I could taste the liquid and gurgling notes of the bobolink in every spoonful of them; and to this day, to make a dinner or supper off a bowl of milk with bread and strawberries,—plenty of strawberries,—well, is as near to being a boy again as I ever expect to come. The golden age draws sensibly near. Appetite becomes a kind of delicious thirst,—a gentle and subtle craving of all parts of the mouth and throat,—and those nerves of taste that occupy, as it were, a back seat, and take little cognizance of grosser foods, come forth, and are played upon and set vibrating. Indeed, I think, if there is ever rejoicing throughout one’s alimentary household,—if ever that much-abused servant, the stomach, says Amen, or those faithful handmaidens, the liver and spleen, nudge each other delightedly, it must be when one on a torrid summer day passes by the solid and carnal dinner for this simple Arcadian dish.

Adam still exists in the taste and appetite of most country boys; is there any country boy who doesn’t love wild strawberries and milk, or who prefers anything else? I’m not talking about a dessert of strawberries and cream; the city boy may have that, too, in a way; but bread and milk, with the addition of wild strawberries, is uniquely a country dish, and it’s to the taste what a wild bird’s song is to the ear. When I was a kid, heading out with my hoe or the cows during strawberry season, I always came back at meal time with a pile of berries in the top of my straw hat. They were my everyday food, and I could taste the sweet, musical notes of the bobolink in every spoonful of them; and to this day, having dinner or supper made of a bowl of milk with bread and strawberries—lots of strawberries—is as close to being a boy again as I ever expect to get. The golden age feels like it's getting closer. Appetite becomes a sort of delicious thirst—a gentle and subtle craving throughout the mouth and throat—and those taste nerves that usually stay in the background, barely noticing heavier foods, come forward and get activated. Honestly, if there’s ever any joy in one’s digestive system—if that often-unappreciated servant, the stomach, says Amen, or those loyal assistants, the liver and spleen, exchange excited glances, it must be when, on a scorching summer day, one opts for this simple, blissful dish instead of a heavy meal.

The wild strawberry, like the wild apple, is spicy and high-flavored, but, unlike the apple, it is also mild and delicious. It has the true rustic sweetness and piquancy. What it lacks in size, when compared with the garden berry, it makes up in intensity. It is never dropsical or overgrown, but firm-fleshed and hardy. Its great enemies are the plow, gypsum, and the horse-rake. It dislikes a limestone soil, but seems to prefer the detritus of the stratified rock. Where the sugar maple abounds, I have always found plenty of wild strawberries. We have two kinds,—the wood berry and the field berry. The former is as wild as a partridge. It is found in open places in the woods and along the borders, growing beside stumps and rocks, never in abundance, but very sparsely. It is small, cone-shaped, dark red, shiny, and pimply. It looks woody, and tastes so. It has never reached the table, nor made the acquaintance of cream. A quart of them, at a fair price for human labor, would be worth their weight in silver at least. (Yet a careful observer writes me that in certain sections in the western part of New York they are very plentiful.)

The wild strawberry, like the wild apple, is flavorful and spicy, but unlike the apple, it’s also mild and tasty. It has genuine rustic sweetness and zest. What it lacks in size compared to the garden berry, it makes up for in intensity. It’s never watery or overgrown, but instead firm and resilient. Its main threats are the plow, gypsum, and horse-rake. It doesn’t thrive in limestone soil but seems to prefer the debris of layered rock. Where sugar maples thrive, I’ve always found lots of wild strawberries. We have two types—the wood berry and the field berry. The former is as wild as a partridge. It's found in open areas in the woods and along the edges, growing next to stumps and rocks, never in large numbers, but very sparsely. It’s small, cone-shaped, dark red, shiny, and bumpy. It looks woody and tastes that way. It has never been served at a table or paired with cream. A quart of them, at a fair price for human labor, would be worth their weight in silver at least. (However, a careful observer has informed me that in certain areas in western New York, they are quite abundant.)

Ovid mentions the wood strawberry, which would lead one to infer that they were more abundant in his time and country than in ours.

Ovid talks about the wild strawberry, which suggests that they were more common in his time and place than they are today.

This is, perhaps, the same as the alpine strawberry, which is said to grow in the mountains of Greece, and thence northward. This was probably the first variety cultivated, though our native species would seem as unpromising a subject for the garden as club-moss or wintergreens.

This might be the same as the alpine strawberry, which is said to grow in the mountains of Greece and then further north. This was likely the first variety to be cultivated, even though our native species seem just as unlikely a choice for the garden as club moss or wintergreens.

Of the field strawberry there are a great many varieties,—some growing in meadows, some in pastures, and some upon mountain-tops. Some are round, and stick close to the calyx or hull; some are long and pointed, with long, tapering necks. These usually grow upon tall stems. They are, indeed, of the slim, linear kind. Your corpulent berry keeps close to the ground; its stem and foot-stalk are short, and neck it has none. Its color is deeper than that of its tall brother, and of course it has more juice. You are more apt to find the tall varieties upon knolls in low, wet meadows, and again upon mountain-tops, growing in tussocks of wild grass about the open summits. These latter ripen in July, and give one his last taste of strawberries for the season.

There are many varieties of field strawberries—some grow in meadows, some in pastures, and some on mountaintops. Some are round and cling closely to the calyx or hull; others are long and pointed, with long, tapering necks. These usually grow on tall stems. They are, in fact, slim and linear. Your plump berry stays close to the ground; its stem and foot-stalk are short, and it has no neck. Its color is darker than that of its tall counterpart, and naturally, it has more juice. You’re more likely to find the tall varieties on knolls in low, wet meadows, or again on mountaintops, growing in clumps of wild grass around the open summits. These later varieties ripen in July, offering one last taste of strawberries for the season.

But the favorite haunt of the wild strawberry is an uplying meadow that has been exempt from the plow for five or six years, and that has little timothy and much daisy. When you go a-berrying, turn your steps toward the milk-white meadows. The slightly bitter odor of the daisies is very agreeable to the smell, and affords a good background for the perfume of the fruit. The strawberry cannot cope with the rank and deep-rooted clover, and seldom appears in a field till the clover has had its day. But the daisy with its slender stalk does not crowd or obstruct the plant, while its broad white flower is like a light parasol that tempers and softens the too strong sunlight. Indeed, daisies and strawberries are generally associated. Nature fills her dish with the berries, then covers them with the white and yellow of milk and cream, thus suggesting a combination we are quick to follow. Milk alone, after it loses its animal heat, is a clod, and begets torpidity of the brain; the berries lighten it, give wings to it, and one is fed as by the air he breathes or the water he drinks.

But the favorite spot for wild strawberries is an elevated meadow that hasn’t been plowed in five or six years, filled with some timothy grass and lots of daisies. When you go berry-picking, head towards the bright white meadows. The slightly bitter scent of the daisies is really pleasant and makes a nice background for the fruit's aroma. Strawberries struggle to grow in dense, deep-rooted clover and usually don’t show up until the clover has finished its season. However, the daisy, with its delicate stem, doesn’t crowd or block the strawberry plant, and its wide white flower acts like a light parasol, softening the harsh sunlight. In fact, daisies and strawberries tend to go hand in hand. Nature fills her bowl with berries, then tops them with the white and yellow of milk and cream, suggesting a combination we easily embrace. Milk, once it cools, becomes heavy and dulls the mind; the berries make it lighter, giving it a lift, and it nourishes you just like the air you breathe or the water you drink.

Then the delight of “picking” the wild berries! It is one of the fragrant memories of boyhood. Indeed, for boy or man to go a-berrying in a certain pastoral country I know of, where a passer-by along the highway is often regaled by a breeze loaded with a perfume of the o’er-ripe fruit, is to get nearer to June than by almost any course I know of. Your errand is so private and confidential! You stoop low. You part away the grass and the daisies, and would lay bare the inmost secrets of the meadow. Everything is yet tender and succulent; the very air is bright and new; the warm breath of the meadow comes up in your face; to your knees you are in a sea of daisies and clover; from your knees up, you are in a sea of solar light and warmth. Now you are prostrate like a swimmer, or like a surf-bather reaching for pebbles or shells, the white and green spray breaks above you; then, like a devotee before a shrine or naming his beads, your rosary strung with luscious berries; anon you are a grazing Nebuchadnezzar, or an artist taking an inverted view of the landscape.

Then there's the joy of “picking” wild berries! It's one of the sweet memories of childhood. Seriously, for a boy or a man to go berry-picking in a certain pastoral area I know, where someone walking along the highway is often greeted by a breeze filled with the scent of ripe fruit, is to experience June in a way few other activities can offer. Your mission feels so private and secret! You stoop down low. You push aside the grass and daisies, eager to uncover the meadow's hidden treasures. Everything is still soft and fresh; the air is bright and crisp; the warm breath of the meadow brushes against your face; from your knees, you're surrounded by a sea of daisies and clover; from your knees up, you're enveloped in sunlight and warmth. Now you're sprawled out like a swimmer or a beachgoer reaching for pebbles or shells, the white and green spray splashing over you; then, like a devotee at a shrine or someone counting their beads, your collection is strung with delicious berries; and soon, you become a grazing Nebuchadnezzar, or an artist looking at the landscape from a different angle.

The birds are alarmed by your close scrutiny of their domain. They hardly know whether to sing or to cry, and do a little of both. The bobolink follows you and circles above and in advance of you, and is ready to give you a triumphal exit from the field, if you will only depart.

The birds are startled by your close watch over their territory. They can’t decide whether to sing or cry, so they do a bit of both. The bobolink follows you, flying above and ahead, ready to celebrate your exit from the area if you would just leave.

“Ye boys that gather flowers and strawberries,
Lo, hid within the grass, an adder lies,”

“Hey boys who pick flowers and strawberries,
Look, hidden in the grass, a snake is lying,”

Warton makes Virgil sing; and Montaigne, in his “Journey to Italy,” says: “The children very often are afraid, on account of the snakes, to go and pick the strawberries that grow in quantities on the mountains and among bushes.” But there is no serpent here,—at worst, only a bumblebee’s or yellow-jacket’s nest. You soon find out the spring in the corner of the field under the beechen tree. While you wipe your brow and thank the Lord for spring water, you glance at the initials in the bark, some of them so old that they seem runic and legendary. You find out, also, how gregarious the strawberry is,—that the different varieties exist in little colonies about the field. When you strike the outskirts of one of these plantations, how quickly you work toward the centre of it, and then from the centre out, then circumnavigate it, and follow up all its branchings and windings!

Warton makes Virgil sing, and Montaigne, in his “Journey to Italy,” says: “The children are often scared of snakes, so they hesitate to pick the strawberries that grow abundantly on the mountains and among the bushes.” But there are no snakes here—at worst, just a bumblebee’s or yellow-jacket’s nest. You quickly discover the spring in the corner of the field under the beech tree. While you wipe your forehead and thank the Lord for the spring water, you glance at the initials carved into the bark, some so old that they look almost runic and legendary. You also realize how sociable the strawberry is—that the different varieties thrive in little colonies throughout the field. When you reach the edge of one of these patches, you eagerly make your way to the center, then from the center out, circumnavigating it and exploring all its branches and twists!

Then the delight in the abstract and in the concrete of strolling and lounging about the June meadows; of lying in pickle for half a day or more in this pastoral sea, laved by the great tide, shone upon by the virile sun, drenched to the very marrow of your being with the warm and wooing influences of the young summer!

Then the joy of being in both the abstract and the real while strolling and relaxing in the June meadows; of lounging for half a day or more in this pastoral landscape, washed by the great tide, warmed by the strong sun, and soaked through to your very core with the inviting and comforting vibes of early summer!

I was a famous berry-picker when a boy. It was near enough to hunting and fishing to enlist me. Mother would always send me in preference to any of the rest of the boys. I got the biggest berries and the most of them. There was something of the excitement of the chase in the occupation, and something of the charm and preciousness of game about the trophies. The pursuit had its surprises, its expectancies, its sudden disclosures,—in fact, its uncertainties. I went forth adventurously. I could wander free as the wind. Then there were moments of inspiration, for it always seemed a felicitous stroke to light upon a particularly fine spot, as it does when one takes an old and wary trout. You discovered the game where it was hidden. Your genius prompted you. Another had passed that way and had missed the prize. Indeed, the successful berry-picker, like Walton’s angler, is born, not made. It is only another kind of angling. In the same field one boy gets big berries and plenty of them; another wanders up and down, and finds only a few little ones. He cannot see them; he does not know how to divine them where they lurk under the leaves and vines. The berry-grower knows that in the cultivated patch his pickers are very unequal, the baskets of one boy or girl having so inferior a look that it does not seem possible they could have been filled from the same vines with certain others. But neither blunt fingers nor blunt eyes are hard to find; and as there are those who can see nothing clearly, so there are those who can touch nothing deftly or gently.

I was a well-known berry-picker when I was a kid. It was close enough to hunting and fishing to excite me. My mom would always choose me over the other boys. I gathered the biggest berries and the most of them. There was something thrilling about the hunt, and the trophies felt special and precious. The pursuit had its surprises, its expectations, and its sudden discoveries—in fact, its uncertainties. I ventured out boldly. I could roam free like the wind. Then there were those inspiring moments when I stumbled upon a particularly great spot, just like when you catch an old, cautious trout. You found the berries where they were hidden. Your instinct guided you. Someone else had walked by and missed the prize. Indeed, a successful berry-picker, like Walton’s angler, is born, not made. It’s simply another form of fishing. In the same field, one boy picks big berries and lots of them, while another wanders around, finding only a few small ones. He can’t see them; he doesn’t know how to uncover them where they hide under the leaves and vines. The berry grower knows that in the cultivated patch, his pickers are very uneven—one boy or girl’s baskets can look so much worse that it’s hard to believe they were filled from the same vines as others. But both clumsy fingers and poor eyesight are common; just as there are those who can’t see anything clearly, there are also those who can’t touch anything with skill or care.

The cultivation of the strawberry is thought to be comparatively modern. The ancients appear to have been a carnivorous race: they gorged themselves with meat; while the modern man makes larger and larger use of fruits and vegetables, until this generation is doubtless better fed than any that has preceded it. The strawberry and the apple, and such vegetables as celery, ought to lengthen human life,—at least to correct its biliousness and make it more sweet and sanguine.

The cultivation of strawberries is considered relatively modern. The ancients seemed to be a meat-loving people who stuffed themselves with meat; meanwhile, today's individuals consume more fruits and vegetables than ever, making this generation certainly better nourished than any before it. Strawberries, apples, and vegetables like celery should help extend human life—at least to reduce its sourness and make it more pleasant and optimistic.

The first impetus to strawberry culture seems to have been given by the introduction of our field berry (Fragaria Virginiana) into England in the seventeenth century, though not much progress was made till the eighteenth. This variety is much more fragrant and aromatic than the native berry of Europe, though less so in that climate than when grown here. Many new seedlings sprang from it, and it was the prevailing berry in English and French gardens, says Fuller, until the South American species, grandiflora, was introduced and supplanted it. This berry is naturally much larger and sweeter, and better adapted to the English climate, than our Virginiana. Hence the English strawberries of to-day surpass ours in these respects, but are wanting in that aromatic pungency that characterizes most of our berries.

The initial push for strawberry farming seems to have come from bringing our field berry (Fragaria Virginiana) to England in the seventeenth century, although not much development happened until the eighteenth. This variety is much more fragrant and aromatic than the native European berry, though it's less so in that climate than when it's grown here. Many new seedlings emerged from it, and according to Fuller, it was the main berry in English and French gardens until the South American species, grandiflora, was introduced and took its place. This berry is typically larger, sweeter, and better suited to the English climate than our Virginiana. As a result, today's English strawberries outshine ours in these ways but lack the aromatic sharpness that defines most of our berries.

The Jocunda, Triumph, Victoria, are foreign varieties of the Grandiflora species; while the Hovey, the Boston Pine, the Downer, are natives of this country.

The Jocunda, Triumph, and Victoria are foreign varieties of the Grandiflora species; while the Hovey, Boston Pine, and Downer are native to this country.

The strawberry, in the main, repeats the form of the human heart, and perhaps, of all the small fruits known to man, none other is so deeply and fondly cherished, or hailed with such universal delight, as this lowly but youth-renewing berry.

The strawberry primarily resembles the shape of the human heart, and maybe, out of all the small fruits known to people, none is more deeply and fondly appreciated, or celebrated with such widespread joy, as this modest yet youth-renewing berry.

IV
IS IT GOING TO RAIN?

I suspect that, like most countrymen, I was born with a chronic anxiety about the weather. Is it going to rain or snow, be hot or cold, wet or dry?—are inquiries upon which I would fain get the views of every man I meet, and I find that most men are fired with the same desire to get my views upon the same set of subjects. To a countryman the weather means something,—to a farmer especially. The farmer has sowed and planted and reaped and vended nothing but weather all his life. The weather must lift the mortgage on his farm, and pay his taxes, and feed and clothe his family. Of what use is his labor unless seconded by the weather? Hence there is speculation in his eye whenever he looks at the clouds, or the moon, or the sunset, or the stars; for even the Milky Way, in his view, may point the direction of the wind to-morrow, and hence is closely related to the price of butter. He may not take the sage’s advice to “hitch his wagon to a star,” but he pins his hopes to the moon, and plants and sows by its phases.

I think that, like most people from rural areas, I've always been a bit anxious about the weather. Is it going to rain or snow, be hot or cold, wet or dry?—these are questions I love to ask everyone I meet, and I notice that most people are just as eager to hear my thoughts on the same topics. For someone living in the countryside, the weather really matters—especially for a farmer. A farmer’s whole life revolves around growing, harvesting, and selling whatever the weather allows. The weather has to help pay off the mortgage on his land, cover his taxes, and provide for his family. What’s the point of all his hard work if the weather doesn’t cooperate? That’s why you can see the speculation in his eyes whenever he checks out the clouds, or the moon, or the sunset, or the stars; even the Milky Way might hint at which way the wind will blow tomorrow, and how that relates to the price of butter. He might not follow the wise advice to “hitch his wagon to a star,” but he definitely places his hopes on the moon and times his planting and sowing by its phases.

Then the weather is that phase of Nature in which she appears not the immutable fate we are so wont to regard her, but on the contrary something quite human and changeable, not to say womanish,—a creature of moods, of caprices, of cross purposes; gloomy and downcast to-day, and all light and joy to-morrow; caressing and tender one moment, and severe and frigid the next; one day iron, the next day vapor; inconsistent, inconstant, incalculable; full of genius, full of folly, full of extremes; to be read and understood, not by rule, but by subtle signs and indirections,—by a look, a glance, a presence, as we read and understand a man or a woman. Some days are like a rare poetic mood. There is a felicity and an exhilaration about them from morning till night. They are positive and fill one with celestial fire. Other days are negative and drain one of his electricity.

Then the weather is that phase of Nature where she doesn’t seem like the unchanging fate we often think of her as, but rather something quite human and unpredictable, almost feminine—a creature of moods, whims, and conflicting intentions; gloomy and downcast today, and all light and joy tomorrow; affectionate and gentle one moment, and harsh and cold the next; one day solid, the next day misty; inconsistent, fickle, unpredictable; full of brilliance, full of foolishness, full of extremes; to be read and understood not by rules, but by subtle signs and hints—by a look, a glance, a presence, just as we understand a man or a woman. Some days feel like a rare poetic mood. There’s a joy and excitement about them from morning to night. They are vibrant and fill you with celestial energy. Other days are dull and drain you of your vitality.

Sometimes the elements show a marked genius for fair weather, as in the fall and early winter of 1877, when October, grown only a little stern, lasted till January. Every shuffle of the cards brought these mild, brilliant days uppermost. There was not enough frost to stop the plow, save once perhaps, till the new year set in. Occasionally a fruit-tree put out a blossom and developed young fruit. The warring of the elements was chiefly done on the other side of the globe, where it formed an accompaniment to the human war raging there. In our usually merciless skies was written only peace and good-will to men, for months.

Sometimes the weather shows a real knack for nice days, like in the fall and early winter of 1877, when October, only slightly harsh, lasted until January. Every shuffle of the cards brought these mild, sunny days to the forefront. There was hardly any frost to stop the plow, maybe just once, until the new year began. Occasionally, a fruit tree would bloom and start developing young fruit. Most of the weather chaos was happening on the other side of the world, where it accompanied the human conflict raging there. In our usually harsh skies, there was only peace and goodwill toward people for months.

What a creature of habit, too, Nature is as she appears in the weather! If she miscarry once she will twice and thrice, and a dozen times. In a wet time it rains to-day because it rained yesterday, and will rain to-morrow because it rained to-day. Are the crops in any part of the country drowning? They shall continue to drown. Are they burning up? They shall continue to burn. The elements get in a rut and can’t get out without a shock. I know a farmer who, in a dry time, when the clouds gather and look threatening, gets out his watering-pot at once, because, he says, “it won’t rain, and ’tis an excellent time to apply the water.” Of course, there comes a time when the farmer is wrong, but he is right four times out of five.

What a creature of habit Nature is, just like the weather! If something goes wrong once, it’ll probably go wrong twice, three times, and even a dozen times. When it’s rainy, it rains today because it rained yesterday, and it will rain tomorrow because it’s raining today. Are the crops in any part of the country drowning? They will keep drowning. Are they drying up? They will keep drying up. The elements get stuck in a pattern and can’t break free without some sort of shock. I know a farmer who, during a dry spell, immediately gets out his watering can when the clouds start to gather and look menacing, because, as he puts it, “it won’t rain, and it’s a perfect time to water the crops.” Of course, there are times when the farmer is wrong, but he’s right four times out of five.

But I am not going to abuse the weather; rather to praise it, and make some amends for the many ill-natured things I have said, within hearing of the clouds, when I have been caught in the rain or been parched and withered by the drought.

But I’m not going to complain about the weather; instead, I want to appreciate it and make up for all the unkind things I've said within earshot of the clouds when I’ve been caught in the rain or dried up and wilted by the drought.

When Mr. Fields’s “Village Dogmatist” was asked what caused the rain, or the fog, he leaned upon his cane and answered, with an air of profound wisdom, that “when the atmosphere and hemisphere come together it causes the earth to sweat, and thereby produces the rain,”—or the fog, as the case may be. The explanation is a little vague, as his biographer suggests, but it is picturesque, and there can be little doubt that two somethings do come in contact that produce a sweating when it rains or is foggy. More than that, the philosophy is simple and comprehensive, which Goethe said was the main matter in such things. Goethe’s explanation is still more picturesque, but I doubt if it is a bit better philosophy. “I compare the earth and her atmosphere,” he said to Eckermann, “to a great living being perpetually inhaling and exhaling. If she inhale she draws the atmosphere to her, so that, coming near her surface, it is condensed to clouds and rain. This state I call water-affirmative.” The opposite state, when the earth exhales and sends the watery vapors upward so that they are dissipated through the whole space of the higher atmosphere, he called “water-negative.”

When Mr. Fields’s “Village Dogmatist” was asked what caused the rain or the fog, he leaned on his cane and answered, with an air of deep wisdom, that “when the atmosphere and hemisphere meet, it makes the earth sweat, which then produces rain”—or fog, depending on the situation. The explanation is a bit vague, as his biographer points out, but it’s vivid, and there’s no doubt that two things come into contact that cause sweating when it rains or is foggy. Beyond that, the philosophy is simple and all-encompassing, which Goethe mentioned was key in such matters. Goethe’s explanation is even more vivid, but I doubt it’s any better as philosophy. “I compare the earth and her atmosphere,” he said to Eckermann, “to a great living being that constantly inhales and exhales. When she inhales, she draws the atmosphere close, so that it condenses into clouds and rain. I call this state water-affirmative.” The opposite state, when the earth exhales and sends the moisture upward so that it spreads throughout the higher atmosphere, he referred to as “water-negative.”

This is good literature, and worthy the great poet; the science of it I would not be so willing to vouch for.

This is great literature and deserving of the great poet; I wouldn’t be so confident in its science.

The poets, more perhaps than the scientists, have illustrated and held by the great law of alternation, of ebb and flow, of turn and return, in nature. An equilibrium, or, what is the same thing, a straight line, Nature abhors more than she does a vacuum. If the moisture of the air were uniform, or the heat uniform, that is, in equilibrio, how could it rain? what would turn the scale? But these things are heaped up, are in waves. There is always a preponderance one way or the other; always “a steep inequality.” Down this incline the rain comes, and up the other side it goes. The high barometer travels like the crest of a sea, and the low barometer like the trough. When the scale kicks the beam in one place, it is correspondingly depressed in some other. When the east is burning up, the west is generally drowning out. The weather, we say, is always in extremes; it never rains but it pours: but this is only the abuse of a law on the part of the elements which is at the bottom of all the life and motion on the globe.

The poets, maybe even more than the scientists, have captured and adhered to the great law of alternation, of ebb and flow, of turning and returning in nature. Nature dislikes equilibrium, or, in other words, a straight line, more than she dislikes a vacuum. If the moisture in the air were uniform, or the heat consistent, that is, in equilibrio, how could it rain? What would tip the scales? But these things are variable, moving in waves. There is always a dominance in one direction or another; there's always “a steep inequality.” Down this slope, the rain falls, and up the other side, it rises. The high barometer moves like the crest of a wave, and the low barometer like the trough. When one side of the scale is heavy, the other side is lighter. When the east is sweltering, the west is usually getting drenched. We say the weather is always extreme; it never rains without pouring. But this is just the elements misapplying a law that underlies all life and movement on Earth.

The rain itself comes in shorter or longer waves,—now fast, now slow—and sometimes in regular throbs or pulse-beats. The fall and winter rains are, as a rule, the most deliberate and general, but the spring and summer rains are always more or less impulsive and capricious. One may see the rain stalking across the hills or coming up the valley in single file, as it were. Another time it moves in vast masses or solid columns, with broad open spaces between. I have seen a spring snowstorm lasting nearly all day that swept down in rapid intermittent sheets or gusts. The waves or pulsations of the storm were nearly vertical and were very marked. But the great fact about the rain is that it is the most beneficent of all the operations of nature; more immediately than sunlight even, it means life and growth. Moisture is the Eve of the physical world, the soft teeming principle given to wife to Adam or heat, and the mother of all that lives. Sunshine abounds everywhere, but only where the rain or dew follows is there life. The earth had the sun long before it had the humid cloud, and will doubtless continue to have it after the last drop of moisture has perished or been dissipated. The moon has sunshine enough, but no rain; hence it is a dead world—a lifeless cinder. It is doubtless true that certain of the planets, as Saturn and Jupiter, have not yet reached the condition of the cooling and ameliorating rains, while in Mars vapor appears to be precipitated only in the form of snow; he is probably past the period of the summer shower. There are clouds and vapors in the sun itself,—clouds of flaming hydrogen and metallic vapors, and a rain every drop of which is a burning or molten meteor. Our earth itself has doubtless passed through the period of the fiery and consuming rains. Mr. Proctor thinks there may have been a time when its showers were downpourings of “muriatic, nitric, and sulphuric acid, not only intensely hot, but fiercely burning through their chemical activity.” Think of a dew that would blister and destroy like the oil of vitriol! but that period is far behind us now. When this fearful fever was past and the earth began to “sweat;” when these soft, delicious drops began to come down, or this impalpable rain of the cloudless nights to fall,—the period of organic life was inaugurated. Then there was hope and a promise of the future. The first rain was the turning-point, the spell was broken, relief was at hand. Then the blazing furies of the fore world began to give place to the gentler divinities of later times.

The rain comes in short or long waves—sometimes fast, sometimes slow—and can feel like it’s pulsing. Generally, the fall and winter rains are the most consistent and widespread, while the spring and summer rains tend to be more impulsive and unpredictable. You might see the rain moving across the hills or coming up the valley in a line. At other times, it flows in large masses or solid columns with wide gaps in between. I’ve witnessed a spring snowstorm lasting nearly all day, pouring down in quick bursts. The waves of the storm were almost vertical and very noticeable. The key thing about rain is that it’s the most beneficial force of nature; more so than sunlight, it signifies life and growth. Moisture is the beginning of the physical world, the nurturing principle given to Adam or heat, and the source of all life. There’s plenty of sunshine everywhere, but life only exists where rain or dew follows. The earth had sunlight long before it had humid clouds and will likely continue to have it after the last drop of moisture is gone. The moon has plenty of sunlight but no rain, making it a lifeless world—a quiet cinder. It’s true that some planets, like Saturn and Jupiter, haven’t yet experienced the cooling and nurturing rains, while Mars seems to only have precipitation in the form of snow; it’s likely past the era of summer thunderstorms. There are clouds and vapors even in the sun—clouds of burning hydrogen and metallic vapors, with raindrops that are like molten meteors. Our own earth has likely gone through periods of fiery and destructive rains. Mr. Proctor believes there may have been a time when its rains were downpours of “muriatic, nitric, and sulphuric acid, not only extremely hot but also intensely corrosive.” Imagine a dew that would blister and destroy like acid! But that time is long gone. Once that terrifying era passed and the earth began to “sweat,” as those soft, gentle drops fell or the invisible rain of clear nights arrived, the age of organic life began. Then there was hope and promise for the future. The first rain marked a turning point; the harsh conditions were over, and relief was in sight. The intense forces of the old world started to give way to the gentler influences of the newer times.

The first water,—how much it means! Seven tenths of man himself is water. Seven tenths of the human race rained down but yesterday! It is much more probable that Alexander will flow out of a bung-hole than that any part of his remains will ever stop one. Our life is indeed a vapor, a breath, a little moisture condensed upon the pane. We carry ourselves as in a phial. Cleave the flesh, and how quickly we spill out! Man begins as a fish, and he swims in a sea of vital fluids as long as his life lasts. His first food is milk; so is his last and all between. He can taste and assimilate and absorb nothing but liquids. The same is true throughout all organic nature. ’Tis water-power that makes every wheel move. Without this great solvent, there is no life. I admire immensely this line of Walt Whitman’s:—

The first water—what a big deal it is! Seventy percent of a person is water. Seventy percent of humanity just came pouring down! It's more likely that Alexander will flow out of a bottle than that any part of him will ever stay put. Our life really is just a mist, a breath, a bit of moisture that collects on the glass. We carry ourselves like we're in a bottle. Cut the flesh, and we spill out in no time! Humans start out like fish, swimming in a sea of vital fluids throughout our lives. Our first food is milk; so is our last, and everything in between. We can only taste, digest, and absorb liquids. This holds true for all living things. It’s water power that gets everything moving. Without this essential solvent, there is no life. I really admire this line from Walt Whitman’s:—

“The slumbering and liquid trees.”

“The sleeping and flowing trees.”

The tree and its fruit are like a sponge which the rains have filled. Through them and through all living bodies there goes on the commerce of vital growth, tiny vessels, fleets and succession of fleets, laden with material bound for distant shores, to build up, and repair, and restore the waste of the physical frame.

The tree and its fruit are like a sponge that has soaked up the rain. Through them and all living things, the process of vital growth continues, with tiny vessels, fleets, and a whole succession of fleets carrying supplies to faraway places, to build up, repair, and restore what’s been lost in the physical body.

Then the rain means relaxation; the tension in Nature and in all her creatures is lessened. The trees drop their leaves, or let go their ripened fruit. The tree itself will fall in a still, damp day, when but yesterday it withstood a gale of wind. A moist south wind penetrates even the mind and makes its grasp less tenacious. It ought to take less to kill a man on a rainy day than on a clear. The direct support of the sun is withdrawn; life is under a cloud; a masculine mood gives place to something like a feminine. In this sense, rain is the grief, the weeping of Nature, the relief of a burdened or agonized heart. But tears from Nature’s eyelids are always remedial and prepare the way for brighter, purer skies.

Then the rain symbolizes relaxation; the tension in nature and all its creatures eases. The trees shed their leaves or release their ripened fruit. The tree itself may fall on a calm, damp day, even after it stood strong against a windstorm just the day before. A moist southern breeze reaches even the mind, loosening its grip. It should take less to harm a person on a rainy day than on a clear one. The sun's direct support is gone; life is under a cloud; a typically strong mood shifts to something more nurturing. In this way, rain represents nature’s sorrow, a manifestation of grief, the release of a heavy or tormented heart. But the tears from nature’s eyelids are always healing, paving the way for brighter, clearer skies.

I think rain is as necessary to the mind as to vegetation. Who does not suffer in his spirit in a drought and feel restless and unsatisfied? My very thoughts become thirsty and crave the moisture. It is hard work to be generous, or neighborly, or patriotic in a dry time, and as for growing in any of the finer graces or virtues, who can do it? One’s very manhood shrinks, and, if he is ever capable of a mean act or of narrow views, it is then.

I believe rain is just as essential for the mind as it is for plants. Who doesn’t feel down and restless during a dry spell? My thoughts feel parched and long for some moisture. It’s tough to be generous, friendly, or patriotic when it's dry, and when it comes to developing any of the finer qualities or virtues, who can do that? One's sense of worth shrinks, and if someone is ever prone to acting selfishly or having a narrow perspective, it’s at times like these.

Oh, the terrible drought! When the sky turns to brass; when the clouds are like withered leaves; when the sun sucks the earth’s blood like a vampire; when rivers shrink, streams fail, springs perish; when the grass whitens and crackles under your feet; when the turf turns to dust; when the fields are like tinder; when the air is the breath of an oven; when even the merciful dews are withheld, and the morning is no fresher than the evening; when the friendly road is a desert, and the green woods like a sick-chamber; when the sky becomes tarnished and opaque with dust and smoke; when the shingles on the houses curl up, the clapboards warp, the paint blisters, the joints open; when the cattle rove disconsolate and the hive-bee comes home empty; when the earth gapes and all nature looks widowed, and deserted, and heart-broken,—in such a time, what thing that has life does not sympathize and suffer with the general distress?

Oh, the awful drought! When the sky feels like metal; when the clouds are like dried-up leaves; when the sun drains the earth like a vampire; when rivers shrink, streams dry up, springs disappear; when the grass turns brown and crunches under your feet; when the ground becomes dust; when the fields are like kindling; when the air is as hot as an oven; when even the much-needed dews are missing, and the morning feels no fresher than the evening; when the familiar road feels like a desert, and the green woods seem like a sick room; when the sky is dull and thick with dust and smoke; when the shingles on the houses curl up, the boards warp, the paint bubbles, and the seams split; when the cattle wander around lost and the bees come back empty; when the earth cracks open and all of nature looks alone, abandoned, and heartbroken—during such a time, what living thing doesn't feel the shared pain and suffering of this widespread distress?

The drought of the summer and early fall of 1876 was one of those severe stresses of weather that make the oldest inhabitant search his memory for a parallel. For nearly three months there was no rain to wet the ground. Large forest trees withered and cast their leaves. In spots, the mountains looked as if they had been scorched by fire. The salt sea-water came up the Hudson ninety miles, when ordinarily it scarcely comes forty. Toward the last, the capacity of the atmosphere to absorb and dissipate the smoke was exhausted, and innumerable fires in forests and peat-swamps made the days and the weeks—not blue, but a dirty yellowish white. There was not enough moisture in the air to take the sting out of the smoke, and it smarted the nose. The sun was red and dim even at midday, and at his rising and setting he was as harmless to the eye as a crimson shield or a painted moon. The meteorological conditions seemed the farthest possible remove from those that produce rain, or even dew. Every sign was negatived. Some malevolent spirit seemed abroad in the air, that rendered abortive every effort of the gentler divinities to send succor. The clouds would gather back in the mountains, the thunder would growl, the tall masses would rise up and advance threateningly, then suddenly cower, their strength and purpose ooze away; they flattened out; the hot, parched breath of the earth smote them; the dark, heavy masses were re-resolved into thin vapor, and the sky came through where but a few moments before there had appeared to be deep behind deep of water-logged clouds. Sometimes a cloud would pass by, and one could see trailing beneath and behind it a sheet of rain, like something let down that did not quite touch the earth, the hot air vaporizing the drops before they reached the ground.

The drought of the summer and early fall of 1876 was one of those harsh weather events that made even the oldest inhabitants search their memories for a similar experience. For almost three months, there was no rain to moisten the ground. Large trees shriveled and dropped their leaves. In places, the mountains looked like they had been scorched by fire. Saltwater pushed up the Hudson ninety miles, when usually it barely reaches forty. Toward the end, the atmosphere's ability to absorb and clear the smoke was overwhelmed, and countless fires in forests and peat bogs turned the days and weeks—not blue, but a dirty yellowish white. There was not enough moisture in the air to ease the sting of the smoke, causing it to irritate the nose. The sun was red and dim even at midday, and when it rose and set, it appeared as harmless to the eye as a crimson shield or a painted moon. The meteorological conditions seemed completely opposite to those that create rain or even dew. Every signal indicated otherwise. It felt like a malevolent presence was in the air, thwarting every effort of the gentler forces to provide relief. The clouds would gather over the mountains, thunder would rumble, the tall masses would rise up and move toward us threateningly, then suddenly retreat, their strength and purpose fading; they flattened out; the hot, parched breath of the earth struck them; the dark, heavy masses were again transformed into thin vapor, and the sky emerged where just moments before there appeared to be layers upon layers of waterlogged clouds. Sometimes a cloud would drift by, and one could see a sheet of rain trailing underneath and behind it, like something lowered that didn’t quite reach the earth, with the hot air vaporizing the drops before they could land.

Two or three times the wind got in the south, and those low, dun-colored clouds that are nothing but harmless fog came hurrying up and covered the sky, and city folk and women folk said the rain was at last near. But the wise ones knew better. The clouds had no backing, the clear sky was just behind them; they were only the nightcap of the south wind, which the sun burnt up before ten o’clock.

Two or three times, the wind blew from the south, bringing along those low, dull-colored clouds that were just harmless fog. They rushed in and covered the sky, prompting city folks and women to say that rain was finally on its way. But the wise ones understood better. The clouds had no support; the clear sky was just behind them. They were merely the nightcap of the south wind, which the sun burned away before ten o’clock.

Every storm has a foundation that is deeply and surely laid, and those shallow surface-clouds that have no root in the depths of the sky deceive none but the unwary.

Every storm has a solid foundation, and those superficial clouds that have no connection to the deep sky fool only the unsuspecting.

At other times, when the clouds were not reabsorbed by the sky and rain seemed imminent, they would suddenly undergo a change that looked like curdling, and when clouds do that no rain need be expected. Time and again I saw their continuity broken up, saw them separate into small masses,—in fact saw a process of disintegration and disorganization going on, and my hope of rain was over for that day. Vast spaces would be affected suddenly; it was like a stroke of paralysis: motion was retarded, the breeze died down, the thunder ceased, and the storm was blighted on the very threshold of success.

At other times, when the clouds weren't absorbed back into the sky and rain seemed about to fall, they would suddenly change in a way that looked like curdling, and when clouds do that, rain isn’t expected. Again and again, I watched their continuity break apart, saw them split into smaller masses—in fact, I witnessed a process of disintegration and chaos, and my hope for rain was gone for that day. Large areas would be suddenly affected; it was like a stroke of paralysis: movement slowed, the breeze stopped, the thunder faded, and the storm was crushed right at the moment of success.

I suppose there is some compensation in a drought; Nature doubtless profits by it in some way. It is a good time to thin out her garden, and give the law of the survival of the fittest a chance to come into play. How the big trees and big plants do rob the little ones! there is not drink enough to go around, and the strongest will have what there is. It is a rest to vegetation, too, a kind of torrid winter that is followed by a fresh awakening. Every tree and plant learns a lesson from it, learns to shoot its roots down deep into the perennial supplies of moisture and life.

I guess there’s some benefit to a drought; nature definitely gains something from it. It’s a good time to thin out her garden and let the survival of the fittest take its course. The big trees and plants really do steal resources from the smaller ones! There isn’t enough water for everyone, so the strongest will take what’s available. It also gives plants a break, a sort of hot winter, followed by a fresh revival. Every tree and plant learns something from this experience, figuring out how to grow its roots deep down into the lasting sources of moisture and life.

But when the rain does come, the warm, sun-distilled rain; the far-traveling, vapor-born rain; the impartial, undiscriminating, unstinted rain; equable, bounteous, myriad-eyed, searching out every plant and every spear of grass, finding every hidden thing that needs water, falling upon the just and upon the unjust, sponging off every leaf of every tree in the forest and every growth in the fields; music to the ear, a perfume to the smell, an enchantment to the eye; healing the earth, cleansing the air, renewing the fountains; honey to the bee, manna to the herds, and life to all creatures,—what spectacle so fills the heart? “Rain, rain, O dear Zeus, down on the plowed fields of the Athenians, and on the plains.”

But when the rain finally arrives, the warm, sun-warmed rain; the rain that travels from far away, born from vapor; the fair, all-encompassing, abundant rain; steady, generous, countless-eyed, seeking out every plant and every blade of grass, uncovering every hidden thing that needs water, falling on the good and the bad alike, soaking every leaf of every tree in the forest and every crop in the fields; a melody to the ears, a fragrance to the nose, a sight to behold; healing the earth, cleaning the air, refreshing the springs; sweet for the bees, food for the herds, and life for all creatures—what sight fills the heart more? “Rain, rain, O dear Zeus, on the plowed fields of the Athenians, and on the plains.”

There is a fine sibilant chorus audible in the sod, and in the dust of the road, and in the porous plowed fields. Every grain of soil and every root and rootlet purrs in satisfaction, Because something more than water comes down when it rains; you cannot produce this effect by simple water; the good-will of the elements, the consent and approbation of all the skyey influences, come down; the harmony, the adjustment, the perfect understanding of the soil beneath and the air that swims above, are implied in the marvelous benefaction of the rain. The earth is ready; the moist winds have wooed it and prepared it, the electrical conditions are as they should be, and there are love and passion in the surrender of the summer clouds. How the drops are absorbed into the ground! You cannot, I say, succeed like this with your hose or sprinkling-pot. There is no ardor or electricity in the drops, no ammonia, or ozone, or other nameless properties borrowed from the air.

There’s a soft, whispering chorus that can be heard in the soil, the dust of the road, and the rich, tilled fields. Every bit of earth and every root and tiny rootlet hums with contentment. Because when it rains, it’s not just water that falls; something deeper than that is at work. You can't create this effect with plain water alone; it’s the goodwill of the elements, the agreement and approval of all the heavenly influences that descend. The balance, the connection, and the perfect harmony between the soil below and the air above are all present in the amazing gift of rain. The earth is ready; the moist winds have courted it and prepared it, the electrical conditions are just right, and there is love and passion in the surrender of the summer clouds. Just look how the drops soak into the ground! You can't replicate this with your hose or watering can. There’s no warmth or energy in those drops, no ammonia, no ozone, or other mysterious properties drawn from the air.

Then one has not the gentleness and patience of Nature; we puddle the ground in our hurry, we seal it up and exclude the air, and the plants are worse off than before. When the sky is overcast and it is getting ready to rain, the moisture rises in the ground, the earth opens her pores and seconds the desire of the clouds.

Then one doesn't have the gentleness and patience of Nature; we disturb the soil in our rush, we cover it up and shut out the air, and the plants end up worse than before. When the sky is cloudy and it's about to rain, the moisture comes up from the ground, the earth opens its pores and supports the clouds' desire.

Indeed, I have found there is but little virtue in a sprinkling-pot after the drought has reached a certain pitch. The soil will not absorb the water. ’Tis like throwing it on a hot stove. I once concentrated my efforts upon a single hill of corn and deluged it with water night and morning for several days, yet its leaves curled up and the ears failed the same as the rest. Something may be done, without doubt, if one begins in time, but the relief seems strangely inadequate to the means often used. In rainless countries good crops are produced by irrigation, but here man can imitate in a measure the patience and bounty of Nature, and, with night to aid him, can make his thirsty fields drink, or rather can pour the water down their throats.

I've realized there's not much use in a watering can once the drought has gone too far. The soil just won't soak up the water. It's like pouring it on a hot stove. I once focused all my efforts on one corn hill and soaked it night and morning for a few days, but its leaves wilted and the ears didn't develop, just like the others. Something can definitely be done if you start early, but the help often feels strangely insufficient compared to the methods used. In dry regions, good crops come from irrigation, but here, people can somewhat mimic Nature's patience and generosity, and with the help of night, can make their parched fields drink, or rather, can force the water down into them.

I have said the rain is as necessary to man as to vegetation. You cannot have a rank, sappy race, like the English or the German, without plenty of moisture in the air and in the soil. Good viscera and an abundance of blood are closely related to meteorological conditions, unction of character, and a flow of animal spirits, too; and I suspect that much of the dry and rarefied humor of New England, as well as the thin and sharp physiognomies, are climatic results. We have rain enough, but not equability of temperature or moisture,—no steady, abundant supply of humidity in the air. In places in Great Britain it is said to rain on an average three days out of four the year through; yet the depth of rainfall is no greater than in this country, where it rains but the one day out of four. John Bull shows those three rainy days both in his temper and in his bodily habit; he is better for them in many ways, and perhaps not quite so good in a few others: they make him juicy and vascular, and maybe a little opaque; but we in this country could well afford a few of his negative qualities for the sake of his stomach and full-bloodedness.

I’ve said that rain is just as essential for people as it is for plants. You can’t have a lush, thriving population, like the English or the Germans, without plenty of moisture in the air and soil. Good health and a rich blood supply are closely tied to weather conditions, personality traits, and energy levels too; I suspect that a lot of the dry and rarefied humor of New England, as well as the lean, sharp features, are results of the climate. We get enough rain, but we lack consistent temperatures or moisture—there’s no steady, ample supply of humidity in the air. In some parts of Great Britain, it’s said to rain on average three days out of four all year round; yet the total rainfall isn’t greater than in this country, where it rains only one day out of four. John Bull shows those three rainy days in both his mood and physical state; they benefit him in many ways, and perhaps make him a bit less favorable in some others: they make him juicy and full of life, but we in this country could likely benefit from a few of his less desirable traits for the sake of his robust health and vitality.

We have such faith in the virtue of the rain, and in the capacity of the clouds to harbor and transport material good, that we more than half believe the stories of the strange and anomalous things that have fallen in showers. There is no credible report that it has ever yet rained pitchforks, but many other curious things have fallen. Fish, flesh, and fowl, and substances that were neither, have been picked up by veracious people after a storm. Manna, blood, and honey, frogs, newts, and fish-worms, are among the curious things the clouds are supposed to yield. If the clouds scooped up their water as the flying express train does, these phenomena could be easier explained. I myself have seen curious things. Riding along the road one day on the heels of a violent summer tempest, I saw the ground swarming with minute hopping creatures. I got out and captured my hands full. They proved to be tree-toads, many of them no larger than crickets, and none of them larger than a bumblebee. There seemed to be thousands of them. The mark of the tree-toad was the round, flattened ends of their toes. I took some of them home, but they died the next day. Where did they come from? I imagined the violent wind swept them off the trees in the woods to windward of the road. But this is only a guess; maybe they crept out of the ground, or from under the wall near by, and were out to wet their jackets.

We have such faith in the goodness of rain and the ability of clouds to carry and deliver valuable things that we almost believe the stories about the odd and unusual things that have fallen during rainstorms. There's no reliable evidence that it has ever rained pitchforks, but many other strange things have indeed fallen. Fish, meat, and birds, as well as other substances, have been collected by honest people after a storm. Manna, blood, honey, frogs, newts, and fish-worms are among the surprising things that clouds are thought to produce. If the clouds collected their water like a speeding express train, these occurrences would be easier to explain. Personally, I've seen strange things. One day, right after a heavy summer storm, I was riding along the road and saw the ground filled with tiny hopping creatures. I got out and filled my hands with them. They turned out to be tree-toads, most no bigger than crickets, and none larger than a bumblebee. There seemed to be thousands of them. The mark of the tree-toad was the round, flattened tips of their toes. I took some home, but they died the next day. Where did they come from? I imagined the strong wind had blown them off the trees in the woods nearby. But that’s just a guess; maybe they crawled out of the ground or from under a nearby wall to get wet.

I have never yet heard of a frog coming down chimney in a shower. Some circumstantial evidence may be pretty conclusive, Thoreau says, as when you find a trout in the milk; and if you find a frog or toad behind the fire-board immediately after a shower, you may well ask him to explain himself.

I have never heard of a frog coming down a chimney during a rain shower. Some circumstantial evidence can be pretty convincing, Thoreau says, like when you find a trout in the milk; and if you find a frog or toad behind the fireboard right after a shower, you might as well ask him to explain himself.

When I was a boy I used to wonder if the clouds were hollow and carried their water as in a cask, because had we not often heard of clouds bursting and producing havoc and ruin beneath them? The hoops gave way, perhaps, or the head was pressed out. Goethe says that when the barometer rises, the clouds are spun off from the top downward like a distaff of flax; but this is more truly the process when it rains. When fair weather is in the ascendant, the clouds are simply reabsorbed by the air; but when it rains, they are spun off into something more compact: ’tis like the threads that issue from the mass of flax or roll of wool, only here there are innumerable threads, and the fingers that hold them never tire. The great spinning-wheel, too, what a humming it makes at times, and how the footsteps of the invisible spinner resound through the cloud-pillared chambers!

When I was a kid, I used to wonder if the clouds were hollow and carried water like a barrel, because hadn’t we often heard about clouds bursting and causing chaos and destruction below them? Maybe the hoops broke, or the top was pushed out. Goethe says that when the barometer goes up, the clouds are spun off from the top down like a flax distaff; but that’s really what happens when it rains. When the weather is nice, the clouds just get absorbed back into the air; but when it rains, they get spun into something denser: it’s like the threads that come from a mass of flax or a roll of wool, only here there are countless threads, and the hands that hold them never get tired. The big spinning wheel, too, what a buzzing it makes sometimes, and how the footsteps of the unseen spinner echo through the cloud-pillar chambers!

The clouds are thus literally spun up into water; and were they not constantly recruited from the atmosphere as the storm-centre travels along,—was new wool not forthcoming from the white sheep and the black sheep that the winds herd at every point,—all rains would be brief and local; the storm would quickly exhaust itself, as we sometimes see a thunder-cloud do in summer. A storm will originate in the far West or Southwest—those hatching-places of all our storms—and travel across the continent, and across the Atlantic to Europe, pouring down incalculable quantities of rain as it progresses and recruiting as it wastes. It is a moving vortex, into which the outlying moisture of the atmosphere is being constantly drawn and precipitated. It is not properly the storm that travels, but the low pressure, the storm impulse, the meteorological magnet that makes the storm wherever its presence may be. The clouds are not watering-carts, that are driven all the way from Arizona or Colorado to Europe, but growths, developments that spring up as the Storm-deity moves his wand across the land. In advance of the storm, you may often see the clouds grow; the condensation of the moisture into vapor is a visible process; slender, spiculé-like clouds expand, deepen, and lengthen; in the rear of the low pressure, the reverse process, or the wasting of the clouds, may be witnessed. In summer, the recruiting of a thunder-storm is often very marked. I have seen the clouds file as straight across the sky toward a growing storm or thunder-head in the horizon as soldiers hastening to the point of attack or defense. They would grow more and more black and threatening as they advanced, and actually seemed to be driven by more urgent winds than certain other clouds. They were, no doubt, more in the line of the storm influence. All our general storms are cyclonic in their character, that is, rotary and progressive. Their type may be seen in every little whirlpool that goes down the swollen current of the river; and in our hemisphere they revolve in the same direction, namely, from right to left, or in opposition to the hands of a watch. When the water finds an outlet through the bottom of a dam, a suction or whirling vortex is developed that generally goes round in the same direction. A morning-glory or a hop-vine or a pole-bean winds around its support in the same course, and cannot be made to wind in any other. I am aware there are some perverse climbers among the plants that persist in going around the pole in the other direction. In the southern hemisphere the cyclone revolves in the other direction, or from left to right. How do they revolve at the equator, then? They do not revolve at all. This is the point of zero, and cyclones are never formed nearer than the third parallel of latitude. Whether hop-vines also refuse to wind about the pole there I am unable to say.

The clouds are literally formed into water; if they weren't constantly replenished from the atmosphere as the storm center moves along—if new wool didn't come from the white sheep and the black sheep that the winds gather at every point—all rains would be brief and localized; the storm would quickly run out, like we sometimes see a thundercloud do in summer. A storm will start in the far West or Southwest—those originating areas of all our storms—and travel across the continent and the Atlantic to Europe, pouring down huge amounts of rain as it moves and gathering moisture as it depletes. It's a moving vortex, constantly drawing and releasing the moisture from the atmosphere. It's not the storm that travels, but the low pressure, the storm momentum, the meteorological force that creates the storm wherever it happens to be. The clouds aren't watering trucks that come all the way from Arizona or Colorado to Europe; they're formations that develop as the Storm-god waves his wand across the land. Ahead of the storm, you can often see the clouds grow; the condensation of moisture into vapor is a visible process; slender, spike-like clouds expand, deepen, and stretch; behind the low pressure, you can see the opposite process, or the dissolving of the clouds. In summer, the buildup of a thunderstorm is often quite noticeable. I've seen the clouds move straight across the sky toward a growing storm or thunderhead on the horizon like soldiers rushing to the battlefield. They became darker and more menacing as they approached, and honestly seemed to be pushed by stronger winds than other clouds. They were definitely more aligned with the storm's influence. All our major storms are cyclonic in nature, meaning they rotate and progress. You can see their type in every little whirlpool that flows down the swollen river. In our hemisphere, they rotate in the same direction—from right to left, or counterclockwise. When water finds an outlet through the bottom of a dam, a suction or swirling vortex is created that typically moves in that same direction. A morning glory, hop vine, or pole bean wraps around its support in the same way and can't be made to wrap any other way. I know there are some stubborn climbing plants that insist on wrapping around the pole in the opposite direction. In the southern hemisphere, the cyclone moves the other way, from left to right. So how do they move at the equator? They don't rotate at all. This is the point of balance, and cyclones are never formed any closer than the third parallel of latitude. Whether hop vines also refuse to wrap around the pole there, I can’t say.

All our cyclones originate in the far Southwest and travel northeast. Why did we wait for the Weather Bureau to tell us this fact? Do not all the filmy, hazy, cirrus and cirro-stratus clouds first appear from the general direction of the sunset? Who ever saw them pushing their opaque filaments over the sky from the east or north? Yet do we not have “northeasters” both winter and summer? True, but the storm does not come from that direction. In such a case we get that segment of the cyclonic whirl. A northeaster in one place may be an easter, a norther, or a souther in some other locality. See through those drifting, drenching clouds that come hurrying out of the northeast, and there are the boss-clouds above them, the great captains themselves, moving serenely on in the opposite direction.

All our cyclones start in the far Southwest and move northeast. Why did we wait for the Weather Bureau to tell us this? Don't all the thin, hazy cirrus and cirrostratus clouds first show up from the general direction of the sunset? Who has ever seen them pushing their thick, dark strands across the sky from the east or north? Yet we do have "northeasters" in both winter and summer. That's true, but the storm doesn't actually come from that direction. In that case, we only get a part of the cyclonic swirl. A northeaster in one place might be an easter, a norther, or a souther in another location. Look through those drifting, soaking clouds that rush in from the northeast, and you'll see the main clouds above them, the great leaders themselves, moving calmly in the opposite direction.

Electricity is, of course, an important agent in storms. It is the great organizer and ring-master. How a clap of thunder will shake down the rain! It gives the clouds a smart rap; it jostles the vapor so that the particles fall together more quickly; it makes the drops let go in double and treble ranks. Nature likes to be helped in that way,—likes to have the water agitated when she is freezing it or heating it, and the clouds smitten when she is compressing them into rain. So does a shock of surprise quicken the pulse in man, and in the crisis of action help him to a decision.

Electricity is obviously a key player in storms. It's the main organizer and conductor. A clap of thunder really gets the rain falling! It gives the clouds a sharp tap; it jostles the moisture so that the droplets come together faster; it makes the raindrops release in groups of two or three. Nature appreciates this kind of assistance—she likes the water stirred up when she's freezing it or heating it, and the clouds jolted when she's forcing them into rain. Just like a sudden surprise quickens a person's heartbeat and helps them make a decision in a critical moment.

What a spur and impulse the summer shower is! How its coming quickens and hurries up the slow, jogging country life! The traveler along the dusty road arouses from his reverie at the warning rumble behind the hills; the children hasten from the field or from the school; the farmer steps lively and thinks fast. In the hay-field, at the first signal-gun of the elements, what a commotion! How the horserake rattles, how the pitchforks fly, how the white sleeves play and twinkle in the sun or against the dark background of the coming storm! One man does the work of two or three. It is a race with the elements, and the hay-makers do not like to be beaten. The rain that is life to the grass when growing is poison to it after it becomes cured hay, and it must be got under shelter, or put up into snug cocks, if possible, before the storm overtakes it.

What a boost and motivation a summer shower is! How its arrival quickens and energizes the slow, easygoing country life! The traveler on the dusty road snaps out of his daydream at the rumbling sound from behind the hills; the kids rush in from the field or school; the farmer moves faster and thinks on his feet. In the hayfield, at the first sign of bad weather, what a flurry! How the horserake clatters, how the pitchforks soar, how the white sleeves dance and shimmer in the sunlight or against the dark backdrop of the impending storm! One person gets done the work of two or three. It’s a race against the elements, and the hay-makers don’t want to lose. The rain that helps the grass while it's growing is harmful to it once it's been made into cured hay, and it needs to be sheltered or stacked securely in small piles, if possible, before the storm catches up with it.

The rains of winter are cold and odorless. One prefers the snow, which warms and covers; but can there be anything more delicious than the first warm April rain,—the first offering of the softened and pacified clouds of spring? The weather has been dry, perhaps, for two or three weeks; we have had a touch of the dreaded drought thus early; the roads are dusty, the streams again shrunken, and forest fires send up columns of smoke on every hand; the frost has all been out of the ground many days; the snow has all disappeared from the mountains; the sun is warm, but the grass does not grow, nor the early seeds come up. The quickening spirit of the rain is needed. Presently the wind gets in the southwest, and, late in the day, we have our first vernal shower, gentle and leisurely, but every drop condensed from warm tropic vapors and charged with the very essence of spring. Then what a perfume fills the air! One’s nostrils are not half large enough to take it in. The smoke, washed by the rain, becomes the breath of woods, and the soil and the newly plowed fields give out an odor that dilates the sense. How the buds of the trees swell, how the grass greens, how the birds rejoice! Hear the robins laugh! This will bring out the worms and the insects, and start the foliage of the trees. A summer shower has more copiousness and power, but this has the charm of freshness and of all first things.

The winter rains are chilly and scentless. People usually prefer the snow, which wraps everything in warmth; but can anything be more delightful than the first warm April rain—the initial gift from the softened and gentle spring clouds? The weather has been dry for maybe two or three weeks; we've felt a hint of the dreaded drought this early on; the roads are dusty, the streams are low again, and forest fires are sending up columns of smoke all around; the frost has been gone from the ground for days; all the snow has melted from the mountains; the sun is warm, but the grass isn’t growing, nor are the early seeds sprouting. We need the invigorating touch of the rain. Soon, the wind shifts to the southwest, and late in the day, we experience our first spring shower, soft and slow, but every drop is gathered from warm tropical vapors and filled with the true essence of spring. What a fragrance fills the air! Our noses can barely take it all in. The smoke, freshened by the rain, becomes the scent of the woods, and the soil and freshly plowed fields release an aroma that expands the senses. Look how the buds on the trees swell, how the grass turns green, how the birds celebrate! Listen to the robins sing! This will bring out the worms and insects, and awaken the leaves of the trees. A summer shower might be heavier and more powerful, but this one has the charm of freshness and the magic of new beginnings.

The laws of storms, up to a certain point, have come to be pretty well understood, but there is yet no science of the weather, any more than there is of human nature. There is about as much room for speculation in the one case as in the other. The causes and agencies are subtle and obscure, and we shall, perhaps, have the metaphysics of the subject before we have the physics.

The rules of storms are mostly understood to a certain extent, but there’s still no full science of the weather, just like there isn’t one for human nature. There’s about the same amount of room for guessing in both cases. The causes and factors are complex and unclear, and we might end up with the philosophy of the topic before we figure out the science.

But as there are persons who can read human nature pretty well, so there are those who can read the weather.

But just as there are people who can understand human nature quite well, there are also those who can read the weather.

It is a masculine subject, and quite beyond the province of woman. Ask those who spend their time in the open air,—the farmer, the sailor, the soldier, the walker; ask the birds, the beasts, the tree-toads: they know, if they will only tell. The farmer diagnoses the weather daily, as the doctor a patient: he feels the pulse of the wind; he knows when the clouds have a scurfy tongue, or when the cuticle of the day is feverish and dry, or soft and moist. Certain days he calls “weather-breeders,” and they are usually the fairest days in the calendar,—all sun and sky. They are too fair; they are suspiciously so. They come in the fall and spring, and always mean mischief. When a day of almost unnatural brightness and clearness in either of these seasons follows immediately after a storm, it is a sure indication that another storm follows close,—follows to-morrow. In keeping with this fact is the rule of the barometer, that, if the mercury suddenly rises very high, the fair weather will not last. It is a high peak that indicates a corresponding depression close at hand. I observed one of these angelic mischief-makers during the past October. The second day after a heavy fall of rain was the fairest of the fair,—not a speck or film in all the round of the sky. Where have all the clouds and vapors gone to so suddenly? was my mute inquiry, but I suspected they were plotting together somewhere behind the horizon. The sky was a deep ultramarine blue; the air so transparent that distant objects seemed near, and the afternoon shadows were sharp and clear. At night the stars were unusually numerous and bright (a sure sign of an approaching storm). The sky was laid bare, as the tidal wave empties the shore of its water before it heaps it up upon it. A violent storm of wind and rain the next day followed this delusive brightness. So the weather, like human nature, may be suspiciously transparent. A saintly day may undo you. A few clouds do not mean rain; but when there are absolutely none, when even the haze and filmy vapors are suppressed or held back, then beware.

It’s a topic for men and definitely not for women. Ask the people who spend their time outdoors—the farmer, the sailor, the soldier, the hiker; ask the birds, the animals, the tree frogs: they know if they’d just speak up. The farmer reads the weather every day, like a doctor checks a patient: he senses the wind’s pulse; he knows when the clouds look unhealthy, or when the day feels hot and dry, or soft and humid. Some days he calls “weather-breeders,” and they’re usually the prettiest days on the calendar—full of sun and blue skies. They look too perfect; it’s suspicious. They show up in the fall and spring and usually spell trouble. When a day is almost unnaturally bright and clear after a storm, it’s a sure sign that another storm is on the way—tomorrow. This matches the barometer’s rule: if the mercury suddenly shoots up very high, the nice weather won’t stick around. A high peak signals that a low is about to drop nearby. I noticed one of these deceptive beauty days last October. The day after a heavy rain was the sunniest of them all—not a cloud in sight. Where did all the clouds and mist disappear to so quickly? I wondered quietly, but I guessed they were scheming somewhere behind the horizon. The sky was a deep ultramarine blue; the air was so clear that distant things looked close, and the afternoon shadows were sharp and distinct. At night, the stars were unusually bright and numerous (a definite sign of a coming storm). The sky was stripped bare, like when a tidal wave pulls water off the shore before crashing back down. A raging storm of wind and rain hit the next day following this misleading brightness. So, the weather, like human nature, can also be deceptively clear. A perfect day can lead to trouble. A few clouds don’t mean rain; but when there are absolutely none, when even the haze and light mists are absent, then it’s time to be cautious.

Then the weather-wise know there are two kinds of clouds, rain-clouds and wind-clouds, and that the latter are always the most portentous. In summer they are black as night; they look as if they would blot out the very earth. They raise a great dust, and set things flying and slamming for a moment, and that is all. They are the veritable wind-bags of Æolus. There is something in the look of rain-clouds that is unmistakable,—a firm, gray, tightly woven look that makes you remember your umbrella. Not too high nor too low, not black nor blue, but the form and hue of wet, unbleached linen. You see the river water in them; they are heavy-laden, and move slow. Sometimes they develop what are called “mares’ tails,”—small cloud-forms here and there against a heavy background, that look like the stroke of a brush, or the streaming tail of a charger. Sometimes a few under-clouds will be combed and groomed by the winds or other meteoric agencies at work, as if for a race. I have seen coming storms develop well-defined vertebré,—a long backbone of cloud, with the articulations and processes clearly marked. Any of these forms, changing, growing, denote rain, because they show unusual agencies at work. The storm is brewing and fermenting. “See those cowlicks,” said an old farmer, pointing to certain patches on the clouds; “they mean rain.” Another time, he said the clouds were “making bag,” had growing udders, and that it would rain before night, as it did. This reminded me that the Orientals speak of the clouds as cows which the winds herd and milk.

Then the weather-savvy know there are two types of clouds: rain clouds and wind clouds, and the latter always seem more ominous. In summer, they’re as dark as night; they look like they could swallow up the entire earth. They kick up a lot of dust, sending things flying and crashing for a moment, and that's it. They're like the real wind-bags of Æolus. There’s something unmistakable about the appearance of rain clouds—a firm, gray, tightly woven look that makes you remember to grab your umbrella. They’re neither too high nor too low, not black nor blue, but have the shape and color of damp, unbleached linen. You can see the river water in them; they’re heavy and move slowly. Sometimes they form what are known as “mares’ tails”—small cloud shapes scattered against a dark background, resembling a brush stroke or the flowing tail of a horse. Occasionally, some lower clouds get styled and adjusted by the winds or other weather phenomena, almost as if for a race. I’ve seen approaching storms create well-defined vertebrae—a long backbone of clouds, with clear joints and features. Any of these changing, growing forms indicate rain because they show unusual activity happening. The storm is brewing and building up. “Look at those cowlicks,” an old farmer once said, pointing to certain patches in the clouds; “they mean rain.” Another time, he mentioned the clouds were “making bag,” having full udders, and that it would rain before night, just as it did. This reminded me that people in the East describe clouds as cows that the winds herd and milk.

In the winter, we see the sun wading in snow. The morning has perhaps been clear, but in the afternoon a bank of gray filmy or cirrus cloud meets him in the west, and he sinks deeper and deeper into it, till, at his going down, his muffled beams are entirely hidden. Then, on the morrow, not

In the winter, we watch the sun walking through the snow. The morning might have been clear, but in the afternoon, a layer of thin gray clouds or cirrus clouds approaches from the west, and the sun sinks deeper and deeper into it until, at sunset, his dim rays are completely hidden. Then, the next day, not

“Announced by all the trumpets of the sky,”

“Announced by all the trumpets in the sky,”

but silent as night, the white legions are here.

but silent as night, the white legions are here.

The old signs seldom fail,—a red and angry sunrise, or flushed clouds at evening. Many a hope of rain have I seen dashed by a painted sky at sunset. There is truth in the old couplet, too:—

The old signs hardly ever miss—like a red and fiery sunrise or pink clouds in the evening. I've seen many hopes for rain crushed by a colorful sunset. There’s truth in the old saying, too:—

“If it rains before seven,
It will clear before eleven.”

“If it rains before seven,
It will be clear by eleven.”

An old Indian had a sign for winter: “If the wind blows the snow off the trees, the next storm will be snow; if it rains off, the next storm will be rain.”

An old Indian had a saying about winter: “If the wind blows the snow off the trees, the next storm will be snow; if it blows the rain off, the next storm will be rain.”

Morning rains are usually short-lived. Better wait till ten o’clock.

Morning rains typically don't last long. It's better to wait until ten o’clock.

When the clouds are chilled, they turn blue and rise up.

When the clouds get cold, they turn blue and float upwards.

When the fog leaves the mountains, reaching upward, as if afraid of being left behind, the fair weather is near.

When the fog lifts off the mountains, reaching up like it's afraid of being left behind, good weather is coming.

Shoddy clouds are of little account, and soon fall to pieces. Have your clouds show a good strong fibre, and have them lined,—not with silver, but with other clouds of a finer texture,—and have them wadded. It wants two or three thicknesses to get up a good rain. Especially, unless you have that cloud-mother, that dim, filmy, nebulous mass that has its root in the higher regions of the air, and is the source and backing of all storms, your rain will be light indeed.

Shoddy clouds don’t matter much and quickly break apart. Make sure your clouds are strong and well-structured—not lined with silver, but with other clouds that have a finer texture—and make sure they’re padded. You need two or three layers to create a decent rain. Especially, if you don’t have that cloud-mother, that vague, misty mass that originates from the higher parts of the atmosphere and is the source of all storms, your rain will be very light.

I fear my reader’s jacket is not thoroughly soaked yet. I must give him a final dash, a “clear-up” shower.

I’m afraid my reader’s jacket isn’t completely soaked yet. I need to give him one last splash, a “clean-up” shower.

We were encamping in the primitive woods, by a little trout lake which the mountain carried high on his hip, like a soldier’s canteen. There were wives in the party, curious to know what the lure was that annually drew their husbands to the woods. That magical writing on a trout’s back they would fain decipher, little heeding the warning that what is written here is not given to woman to know.

We were camping in the wild woods, near a small trout lake that the mountain held high, like a soldier’s canteen. There were wives in the group, eager to understand what it was that brought their husbands to the woods every year. They wanted to figure out the special charm of a trout's markings, not paying much attention to the warning that what is written here isn't meant for women to understand.

Our only tent or roof was the sheltering arms of the great birches and maples. What was sauce for the gander should be sauce for the goose, too, so the goose insisted. A luxurious couch of boughs upon springing poles was prepared, and the night should be not less welcome than the day, which had indeed been idyllic. (A trout dinner had been served by a little spring brook, upon an improvised table covered with moss and decked with ferns, with strawberries from a near clearing.)

Our only cover was the protective branches of the big birches and maples. What was good for the gander should be good for the goose as well, so the goose insisted. A comfy bed of branches on some raised poles was set up, and the night should be just as inviting as the day, which had truly been perfect. (We enjoyed a trout dinner by a small spring brook, on a makeshift table covered with moss and decorated with ferns, along with strawberries from a nearby clearing.)

At twilight there was an ominous rumble behind the mountains. I was on the lake, and could see what was brewing there in the west.

At twilight, there was a threatening rumble behind the mountains. I was on the lake and could see what was forming in the west.

As darkness came on, the rumbling increased, and the mountains and the woods and the still air were such good conductors of sound that the ear was vividly impressed. One seemed to feel the enormous convolutions of the clouds in the deep and jarring tones of the thunder. The coming of night in the woods is alone peculiarly impressive, and it is doubly so when out of the darkness comes such a voice as this. But we fed the fire the more industriously, and piled the logs high, and kept the gathering gloom at bay by as large a circle of light as we could command. The lake was a pool of ink and as still as if congealed; not a movement or a sound, save now and then a terrific volley from the cloud batteries now fast approaching. By nine o’clock little puffs of wind began to steal through the woods and tease and toy with our fire. Shortly after, an enormous electric bombshell exploded in the treetops over our heads, and the ball was fairly opened. Then followed three hours, with only two brief intermissions, of as lively elemental music and as copious an outpouring of rain as it was ever my lot to witness. It was a regular meteorological carnival, and the revelers were drunk with the wild sport. The apparent nearness of the clouds and the electric explosions was something remarkable. Every discharge seemed to be in the branches immediately overhead and made us involuntarily cower, as if the next moment the great limbs of the trees, or the trees themselves, would come crashing down. The mountain upon which we were encamped appeared to be the focus of three distinct but converging storms. The last two seemed to come into collision immediately over our camp-fire, and to contend for the right of way, until the heavens were ready to fall and both antagonists were literally spent. We stood in groups about the struggling fire, and when the cannonade became too terrible would withdraw into the cover of the darkness, as if to be a less conspicuous mark for the bolts; or did we fear that the fire, with its currents, might attract the lightning? At any rate, some other spot than the one where we happened to be standing seemed desirable when those onsets of the contending elements were the most furious. Something that one could not catch in his hat was liable to drop almost anywhere any minute. The alarm and consternation of the wives communicated itself to the husbands, and they looked solemn and concerned. The air was filled with falling water. The sound upon the myriad leaves and branches was like the roar of a cataract. We put our backs up against the great trees, only to catch a brook on our shoulders or in the backs of our necks. Still the storm waxed. The fire was beaten down lower and lower. It surrendered one post after another, like a besieged city, and finally made only a feeble resistance from beneath a pile of charred logs and branches in the centre. Our garments yielded to the encroachments of the rain in about the same manner. I believe my necktie held out the longest, and carried a few dry threads safely through. Our cunningly devised and bedecked table, which the housekeepers had so doted on and which was ready spread for breakfast, was washed as by the hose of a fire-engine,—only the bare poles remained,—and the couch of springing boughs, that was to make Sleep jealous and o’er-fond, became a bed fit only for amphibians. Still the loosened floods came down; still the great cloud-mortars bellowed and exploded their missiles in the treetops above us. But all nervousness finally passed away, and we became dogged and resigned. Our minds became water-soaked; our thoughts were heavy and bedraggled. We were past the point of joking at one another’s expense. The witticisms failed to kindle,—indeed, failed to go, like the matches in our pockets. About midnight the rain slackened, and by one o’clock ceased entirely. How the rest of the night was passed beneath the dripping trees and upon the saturated ground, I have only the dimmest remembrance. All is watery and opaque; the fog settles down and obscures the scene. But I suspect I tried the “wet pack” without being a convert to hydropathy. When the morning dawned, the wives begged to be taken home, convinced that the charms of camping-out were greatly overrated. We, who had tasted this cup before, knew they had read at least a part of the legend of the wary trout without knowing it.

As darkness fell, the rumbling grew louder, and the mountains, woods, and still air were so effective at carrying sound that it really caught your attention. It felt as if you could sense the massive twisting of the clouds in the deep, thunderous roars. The arrival of night in the woods is particularly striking, and it's even more so when such a powerful sound comes out of the darkness. But we worked hard to keep the fire going, stacking the logs high, creating as large a circle of light as we could to fend off the encroaching gloom. The lake was like a dark pool, completely still; there wasn’t a movement or a sound, except for the occasional loud crash from the storm clouds that were rapidly approaching. By nine o’clock, small gusts of wind began to weave through the woods, playing with our fire. Shortly after that, a massive bolt of lightning exploded in the treetops above us, and the storm officially began. What followed were three hours of intense elemental music and an incredible downpour of rain unlike anything I had ever seen. It felt like a weather party, and the chaos was intoxicating. The apparent closeness of the clouds and the electric flashes were astonishing. Every thunderclap seemed to erupt just above our heads, making us instinctively flinch, as if at any moment, the giant branches or the trees themselves would come crashing down. The mountain we were camping on seemed to be at the center of three different but converging storms. The last two seemed to clash right above our campfire, battling for dominance, as if the sky was about to collapse and both sides were completely drained. We gathered around the struggling fire, and when the thunder became overwhelming, we would retreat into the cover of darkness, perhaps thinking it would make us less vulnerable to lightning; or maybe we worried that the fire's glow might attract it? Regardless, it seemed wise to find another spot during the fiercest bursts of the storm. Anything that you couldn't catch with your hat could fall at any moment, anywhere. The panic of the wives spread to their husbands, who looked grave and worried. The air was filled with rain. The sound of it on the countless leaves and branches was like a waterfall roaring. We leaned against the massive trees, only to feel water pouring over our shoulders and necks. Meanwhile, the storm intensified. The fire dwindled lower and lower, surrendering one log after another like a city under siege, until it was only barely holding on beneath a pile of charred logs and branches in the center. Our clothes yielded to the relentless rain in a similar way. I think my necktie held out the longest, managing to keep a few dry threads safe. Our cleverly arranged and decorated table, which the housekeepers had cherished and set for breakfast, was drenched as if sprayed by a fire hose—only the bare poles remained—and the bed of branches, meant to entice sleep, became suitable only for frogs. Still, the torrents poured down, and the great thunderclouds roared and blasted their strikes into the treetops above us. But eventually, our nerves settled, and we became stubborn and resigned. Our thoughts became drenched, heavy, and frazzled. We were past making jokes at each other’s expense. Any witty remarks fell flat—just like the matches in our pockets. Around midnight, the rain eased, and by one o’clock it stopped completely. I barely remember how the rest of the night went beneath the dripping trees and on the soaked ground; everything feels hazy and soggy, with fog settling in and obscuring what we could see. I suspect I tried the “wet pack” without actually embracing hydropathy. When morning came, the wives requested to go home, convinced that the joys of camping out were seriously exaggerated. We, who had experienced this before, knew they had partially read the story of the cunning trout without realizing it.

V
SPECKLED TROUT

I

The legend of the wary trout, hinted at in the last sketch, is to be further illustrated in this and some following chapters. We shall get at more of the meaning of those dark water-lines, and I hope, also, not entirely miss the significance of the gold and silver spots and the glancing iridescent hues. The trout is dark and obscure above, but behind this foil there are wondrous tints that reward the believing eye. Those who seek him in his wild remote haunts are quite sure to get the full force of the sombre and uninviting aspects,—the wet, the cold, the toil, the broken rest, and the huge, savage, uncompromising nature,—but the true angler sees farther than these, and is never thwarted of his legitimate reward by them.

The legend of the cautious trout, mentioned in the last section, will be explored further in this and several upcoming chapters. We will uncover more of the meaning behind those dark water lines, and I hope we won't miss the significance of the gold and silver spots and the shimmering iridescent colors. The trout is dark and hidden on top, but beneath this disguise, there are amazing colors that reward the observant eye. Those who look for him in his wild, remote locations are bound to encounter the full force of the grim and unwelcoming surroundings—the wet, the cold, the effort, the disrupted rest, and the vast, wild, unyielding nature—but the true angler sees beyond these challenges and is never denied his rightful reward by them.

I have been a seeker of trout from my boyhood, and on all the expeditions in which this fish has been the ostensible purpose I have brought home more game than my creel showed. In fact, in my mature years I find I got more of nature into me, more of the woods, the wild, nearer to bird and beast, while threading my native streams for trout, than in almost any other way. It furnished a good excuse to go forth; it pitched one in the right key; it sent one through the fat and marrowy places of field and wood. Then the fisherman has a harmless, preoccupied look; he is a kind of vagrant that nothing fears. He blends himself with the trees and the shadows. All his approaches are gentle and indirect. He times himself to the meandering, soliloquizing stream; its impulse bears him along. At the foot of the waterfall he sits sequestered and hidden in its volume of sound. The birds know he has no designs upon them, and the animals see that his mind is in the creek. His enthusiasm anneals him, and makes him pliable to the scenes and influences he moves among.

I’ve been a trout seeker since I was a kid, and on all the trips where catching this fish was the main goal, I came back with more than what my creel showed. In fact, as I've grown up, I realize that I absorbed more of nature, more of the woods, and felt closer to birds and animals while fishing in my local streams than in almost any other way. It provided a great excuse to get outdoors; it set the right mood for me and led me through the lush areas of fields and woods. Plus, when you’re fishing, you look calm and absorbed; you become a kind of wanderer that nothing fears. You blend in with the trees and shadows. Your movements are gentle and subtle. You sync up with the winding, thoughtful stream; its flow carries you along. At the base of the waterfall, you sit secluded, wrapped in its sound. The birds know you mean them no harm, and the animals can tell your mind is focused on the creek. Your enthusiasm connects you deeply, making you receptive to the scenes and influences around you.

Then what acquaintance he makes with the stream! He addresses himself to it as a lover to his mistress; he wooes it and stays with it till he knows its most hidden secrets. It runs through his thoughts not less than through its banks there; he feels the fret and thrust of every bar and boulder. Where it deepens, his purpose deepens; where it is shallow, he is indifferent. He knows how to interpret its every glance and dimple; its beauty haunts him for days.

Then he really gets to know the stream! He talks to it like a lover talks to his beloved; he flirts with it and spends time there until he learns its deepest secrets. It flows through his thoughts just like it flows along its banks; he feels every bump and rock. Where it gets deeper, his intentions grow stronger; where it’s shallow, he doesn’t care. He knows how to read its every glance and ripple; its beauty lingers in his mind for days.

trout stream

I am sure I run no risk of overpraising the charm and attractiveness of a well-fed trout stream, every drop of water in it as bright and pure as if the nymphs had brought it all the way from its source in crystal goblets, and as cool as if it had been hatched beneath a glacier. When the heated and soiled and jaded refugee from the city first sees one, he feels as if he would like to turn it into his bosom and let it flow through him a few hours, it suggests such healing freshness and newness. How his roily thoughts would run clear; how the sediment would go downstream! Could he ever have an impure or an unwholesome wish afterward? The next best thing he can do is to tramp along its banks and surrender himself to its influence. If he reads it intently enough, he will, in a measure, be taking it into his mind and heart, and experiencing its salutary ministrations.

I’m sure I’m not exaggerating when I say that a well-fed trout stream is incredibly charming and attractive, with every drop of water as bright and pure as if nymphs had carried it from the source in crystal goblets, and as cool as if it had been born under a glacier. When a tired and dirty city dweller first sees one, they feel like they want to embrace it and let it flow through them for a few hours; it offers such refreshing healing and newness. Just imagine how clearly their muddled thoughts would become; how the muck would wash away! Could they ever have a dirty or unhealthy desire afterward? The next best thing they can do is stroll along its banks and let its vibes wash over them. If they focus on it deeply enough, they'll be, in a way, absorbing it into their mind and heart, and feeling its beneficial effects.

Trout streams coursed through every valley my boyhood knew. I crossed them, and was often lured and detained by them, on my way to and from school. We bathed in them during the long summer noons, and felt for the trout under their banks. A holiday was a holiday indeed that brought permission to go fishing over on Rose’s Brook, or up Hardscrabble, or in Meeker’s Hollow; all-day trips, from morning till night, through meadows and pastures and beechen woods, wherever the shy, limpid stream led. What an appetite it developed! a hunger that was fierce and aboriginal, and that the wild strawberries we plucked as we crossed the hill teased rather than allayed. When but a few hours could be had, gained perhaps by doing some piece of work about the farm or garden in half the allotted time, the little creek that headed in the paternal domain was handy; when half a day was at one’s disposal, there were the hemlocks, less than a mile distant, with their loitering, meditative, log-impeded stream and their dusky, fragrant depths. Alert and wide-eyed, one picked his way along, startled now and then by the sudden bursting-up of the partridge, or by the whistling wings of the “dropping snipe,” pressing through the brush and the briers, or finding an easy passage over the trunk of a prostrate tree, carefully letting his hook down through some tangle into a still pool, or standing in some high, sombre avenue and watching his line float in and out amid the moss-covered boulders. In my first essayings I used to go to the edge of these hemlocks, seldom dipping into them beyond the first pool where the stream swept under the roots of two large trees. From this point I could look back into the sunlit fields where the cattle were grazing; beyond, all was gloom and mystery; the trout were black, and to my young imagination the silence and the shadows were blacker. But gradually I yielded to the fascination and penetrated the woods farther and farther on each expedition, till the heart of the mystery was fairly plucked out. During the second or third year of my piscatorial experience I went through them, and through the pasture and meadow beyond, and through another strip of hemlocks, to where the little stream joined the main creek of the valley.

Trout streams ran through every valley of my childhood. I crossed them frequently, often getting distracted and held up on my way to and from school. We swam in them during long summer afternoons and searched for trout beneath their banks. A holiday was truly a holiday if it meant I could go fishing at Rose’s Brook, up Hardscrabble, or in Meeker’s Hollow; full-day adventures, from morning till night, through fields and meadows and beech woods, wherever the gentle stream led. It really stirred up my appetite! A hunger that was raw and elemental, which the wild strawberries we picked as we moved across the hill only teased instead of satisfying. When I only had a couple of hours, maybe earned by doing some chores around the farm or garden in half the usual time, the little creek that started on our property was convenient; when I had half a day free, there were the hemlocks, less than a mile away, with their slow, thoughtful, log-blocked stream and their shadowy, fragrant depths. Eager and wide-eyed, I'd pick my way along, occasionally startled by a partridge suddenly taking off or by the whistling wings of the "dropping snipe," pushing through the brush and thorns, or finding an easy route over the trunk of a fallen tree, carefully letting my line down through some tangle into a calm pool, or standing in a dark, quiet path and watching my line drift in and out among the mossy boulders. In my early attempts, I usually stayed at the edge of these hemlocks, rarely going deeper than the first pool where the stream flowed under the roots of two big trees. From there, I could look back into the sunlit fields where the cattle grazed; beyond, everything was shadowy and mysterious; the trout were dark, and to my young imagination, the silence and shadows felt even darker. But gradually, I gave in to the allure and began to explore deeper into the woods on each trip, until the heart of the mystery was fully revealed. By my second or third year of fishing, I ventured through them, pastures, and meadows beyond, and through another stretch of hemlocks to where the little stream met the main creek of the valley.

In June, when my trout fever ran pretty high, and an auspicious day arrived, I would make a trip to a stream a couple of miles distant, that came down out of a comparatively new settlement. It was a rapid mountain brook presenting many difficult problems to the young angler, but a very enticing stream for all that, with its two saw-mill dams, its pretty cascades, its high, shelving rocks sheltering the mossy nests of the phƓbe-bird, and its general wild and forbidding aspects.

In June, when my excitement for trout fishing was at its peak, and a perfect day came along, I would head to a stream a couple of miles away, originating from a relatively new settlement. It was a fast mountain brook that posed many challenges for a young angler, but it was still a very appealing stream, with its two sawmill dams, beautiful cascades, steep rocky shelves providing homes for the mossy nests of the phoebe bird, and its overall wild and rugged look.

But a meadow brook was always a favorite. The trout like meadows; doubtless their food is more abundant there, and, usually, the good hiding-places are more numerous. As soon as you strike a meadow the character of the creek changes: it goes slower and lies deeper; it tarries to enjoy the high, cool banks and to half hide beneath them; it loves the willows, or rather the willows love it and shelter it from the sun; its spring runs are kept cool by the overhanging grass, and the heavy turf that faces its open banks is not cut away by the sharp hoofs of the grazing cattle. Then there are the bobolinks and the starlings and the meadowlarks, always interested spectators of the angler; there are also the marsh marigolds, the buttercups, or the spotted lilies, and the good angler is always an interested spectator of them. In fact, the patches of meadow land that lie in the angler’s course are like the happy experiences in his own life, or like the fine passages in the poem he is reading; the pasture oftener contains the shallow and monotonous places. In the small streams the cattle scare the fish, and soil their element and break down their retreats under the banks. Woodland alternates the best with meadow: the creek loves to burrow under the roots of a great tree, to scoop out a pool after leaping over the prostrate trunk of one, and to pause at the foot of a ledge of moss-covered rocks, with ice-cold water dripping down. How straight the current goes for the rock! Note its corrugated, muscular appearance; it strikes and glances off, but accumulates, deepens with well-defined eddies above and to one side; on the edge of these the trout lurk and spring upon their prey.

But a meadow stream has always been a favorite. Trout like meadows; probably their food is more plentiful there, and, usually, there are more good hiding spots. As soon as you enter a meadow, the stream’s character changes: it slows down and gets deeper; it lingers to enjoy the high, cool banks and partially hides beneath them; it loves the willows, or rather the willows love it and protect it from the sun; its spring runs stay cool thanks to the overhanging grass, and the thick grass that faces its open banks isn’t trampled by the sharp hooves of grazing cattle. Then there are the bobolinks, starlings, and meadowlarks, always curious observers of the angler; there are also marsh marigolds, buttercups, and spotted lilies, and a good angler is always a fascinated observer of them. In fact, the patches of meadow land that lie in the angler’s path are like the happy moments in his own life, or like the beautiful passages in the poem he’s reading; the pasture more often has the shallow and monotonous spots. In the small streams, the cattle scare the fish, dirty their water, and destroy their hiding places under the banks. Woodland often pairs best with meadow: the stream loves to burrow under the roots of a huge tree, to carve out a pool after jumping over the fallen trunk of one, and to pause at the base of a ledge of moss-covered rocks, with icy water dripping down. How straight the current flows toward the rock! Notice its ridged, powerful appearance; it strikes and bounces off, but gathers, deepening with well-defined eddies above and to one side; on the edge of these, the trout lie in wait and spring forth to catch their prey.

The angler learns that it is generally some obstacle or hindrance that makes a deep place in the creek, as in a brave life; and his ideal brook is one that lies in deep, well-defined banks, yet makes many a shift from right to left, meets with many rebuffs and adventures, hurled back upon itself by rocks, waylaid by snags and trees, tripped up by precipices, but sooner or later reposing under meadow banks, deepening and eddying beneath bridges, or prosperous and strong in some level stretch of cultivated land with great elms shading it here and there.

The fisherman realizes that it’s usually some obstacle or challenge that creates a deep spot in the creek, just like in a courageous life; and his perfect stream is one that flows between deep, well-defined banks, yet frequently shifts from side to side, facing many setbacks and adventures, pushed back by rocks, blocked by snags and trees, tripped up by cliffs, but eventually resting under meadow banks, deepening and swirling beneath bridges, or thriving and strong in some flat stretch of farmland, with large elm trees providing shade here and there.

But I early learned that from almost any stream in a trout country the true angler could take trout, and that the great secret was this, that, whatever bait you used, worm, grasshopper, grub, or fly, there was one thing you must always put upon your hook, namely, your heart: when you bait your hook with your heart the fish always bite; they will jump clear from the water after it; they will dispute with each other over it; it is a morsel they love above everything else. With such bait I have seen the born angler (my grandfather was one) take a noble string of trout from the most unpromising waters, and on the most unpromising day. He used his hook so coyly and tenderly, he approached the fish with such address and insinuation, he divined the exact spot where they lay: if they were not eager, he humored them and seemed to steal by them; if they were playful and coquettish, he would suit his mood to theirs; if they were frank and sincere, he met them halfway; he was so patient and considerate, so entirely devoted to pleasing the critical trout, and so successful in his efforts,—surely his heart was upon his hook, and it was a tender, unctuous heart, too, as that of every angler is. How nicely he would measure the distance! how dexterously he would avoid an overhanging limb or bush and drop the line exactly in the right spot! Of course there was a pulse of feeling and sympathy to the extremity of that line. If your heart is a stone, however, or an empty husk, there is no use to put it upon your hook; it will not tempt the fish; the bait must be quick and fresh. Indeed, a certain quality of youth is indispensable to the successful angler, a certain unworldliness and readiness to invest yourself in an enterprise that doesn’t pay in the current coin. Not only is the angler, like the poet, born and not made, as Walton says, but there is a deal of the poet in him, and he is to be judged no more harshly; he is the victim of his genius: those wild streams, how they haunt him! he will play truant to dull care, and flee to them; their waters impart somewhat of their own perpetual youth to him. My grandfather when he was eighty years old would take down his pole as eagerly as any boy, and step off with wonderful elasticity toward the beloved streams; it used to try my young legs a good deal to follow him, specially on the return trip. And no poet was ever more innocent of worldly success or ambition. For, to paraphrase Tennyson,—

But I learned early on that from almost any stream in a trout area, a true angler could catch trout, and the big secret was this: no matter what bait you used—worm, grasshopper, grub, or fly—there’s one thing you always have to put on your hook, and that’s your heart. When you bait your hook with your heart, the fish always bite; they’ll leap right out of the water after it; they’ll compete with one another over it; it’s a treat they love more than anything else. With that kind of bait, I’ve seen the natural angler (my grandfather was one) pull a beautiful string of trout from the most unlikely waters, even on the most unpromising days. He used his hook with such delicacy and care, approached the fish with such skill and subtlety, and knew the exact spots where they were hiding: if they weren’t eager, he would play along and seem to sneak past them; if they were playful and flirty, he matched their mood; if they were open and honest, he met them halfway; he was so patient and considerate, completely focused on pleasing the picky trout, and incredibly successful at it—surely his heart was on his hook, and it was a tender, warm heart, just as every angler’s is. He would measure distances perfectly! He would skillfully avoid overhanging branches or bushes and drop the line exactly in the right place! Of course, there was a pulse of feeling and empathy all the way to the end of that line. But if your heart is like a stone or an empty shell, there’s no point in putting it on your hook; it won’t attract the fish; the bait needs to be lively and fresh. In fact, a certain youthfulness is essential for a successful angler, a kind of innocence and willingness to throw yourself into an endeavor that doesn’t pay off in tangible rewards. Not only is the angler, like the poet, born and not made, as Walton says, but there’s a lot of the poet in him as well, and we shouldn’t judge him too harshly; he is at the mercy of his talent: those wild streams, how they haunt him! He’ll skip out on boring responsibilities and escape to them; their waters give him a bit of their eternal youth. My grandfather, even at eighty, would grab his fishing pole as eagerly as any young boy and stride off with amazing energy toward the treasured streams; it would really tire my young legs to keep up with him, especially on the way back. And no poet was ever more free of worldly success or ambition. For, to paraphrase Tennyson,—

“Lusty trout to him were scrip and share,
And babbling waters more than cent for cent.”

“Excited trout were like treasures to him,
And the babbling waters were worth more than money.”

He laid up treasures, but they were not in this world. In fact, though the kindest of husbands, I fear he was not what the country people call a “good provider,” except in providing trout in their season, though it is doubtful if there was always fat in the house to fry them in. But he could tell you they were worse off than that at Valley Forge, and that trout, or any other fish, were good roasted in the ashes under the coals. He had the Walton requisite of loving quietness and contemplation, and was devout withal. Indeed, in many ways he was akin to those Galilee fishermen who were called to be fishers of men. How he read the Book and pored over it, even at times, I suspect, nodding over it, and laying it down only to take up his rod, over which, unless the trout were very dilatory and the journey very fatiguing, he never nodded!

He saved up treasures, but they weren't from this world. In fact, even though he was the kindest of husbands, I worry he wasn't what the locals call a “good provider,” except when it came to catching trout in season, though it's questionable whether there was always enough fat at home to cook them. But he could let you know they were worse off than that at Valley Forge, and that trout, or any other fish, could be good roasted in the coals. He had the Walton quality of appreciating peace and reflection, and was devoted as well. Indeed, in many ways, he was similar to those fishermen from Galilee who were called to be fishers of men. How he read the Book and studied it, even sometimes nodding off while reading, and laying it down only to pick up his fishing rod, over which, unless the trout were very slow to bite and the trip very tiring, he never dozed off!

II

The Delaware is one of our minor rivers, but it is a stream beloved of the trout. Nearly all its remote branches head in mountain springs, and its collected waters, even when warmed by the summer sun, are as sweet and wholesome as dew swept from the grass. The Hudson wins from it two streams that are fathered by the mountains from whose loins most of its beginnings issue, namely, the Rondout and the Esopus. These swell a more illustrious current than the Delaware, but the Rondout, one of the finest trout streams in the world, makes an uncanny alliance before it reaches its destination, namely, with the malarious Wallkill.

The Delaware is one of our smaller rivers, but it's a stream loved by trout. Almost all its distant branches start in mountain springs, and its collected waters, even when warmed by the summer sun, are as sweet and refreshing as dew collected from the grass. The Hudson receives two streams from it that come from the mountains where most of its origins flow, specifically, the Rondout and the Esopus. These create a more prominent current than the Delaware, but the Rondout, one of the best trout streams in the world, forms a strange partnership before it reaches its end, specifically with the mosquito-filled Wallkill.

In the same nest of mountains from which they start are born the Neversink and the Beaverkill, streams of wondrous beauty that flow south and west into the Delaware. From my native hills I could catch glimpses of the mountains in whose laps these creeks were cradled, but it was not till after many years, and after dwelling in a country where trout are not found, that I returned to pay my respects to them as an angler.

In the same mountain range where they begin, the Neversink and the Beaverkill are born, streams of incredible beauty that flow south and west into the Delaware. From my hometown hills, I could see the mountains that cradle these creeks, but it wasn’t until many years later, after living in a place where trout aren’t found, that I returned to pay my respects to them as a fisherman.

My first acquaintance with the Neversink was made in company with some friends in 1869. We passed up the valley of the Big Ingin, marveling at its copious ice-cold springs, and its immense sweep of heavy-timbered mountain-sides. Crossing the range at its head, we struck the Neversink quite unexpectedly about the middle of the afternoon, at a point where it was a good-sized trout stream. It proved to be one of those black mountain brooks born of innumerable ice-cold springs, nourished in the shade, and shod, as it were, with thick-matted moss, that every camper-out remembers. The fish are as black as the stream and very wild. They dart from beneath the fringed rocks, or dive with the hook into the dusky depths,—an integral part of the silence and the shadows. The spell of the moss is over all. The fisherman’s tread is noiseless, as he leaps from stone to stone and from ledge to ledge along the bed of the stream. How cool it is! He looks up the dark, silent defile, hears the solitary voice of the water, sees the decayed trunks of fallen trees bridging the stream, and all he has dreamed, when a boy, of the haunts of beasts of prey—the crouching feline tribes, especially if it be near nightfall and the gloom already deepening in the woods—comes freshly to mind, and he presses on, wary and alert, and speaking to his companions in low tones.

My first experience with the Neversink was with some friends in 1869. We traveled up the Big Ingin valley, amazed by its plentiful ice-cold springs and the vast stretches of thickly wooded mountains. After crossing the ridge at its head, we unexpectedly came across the Neversink in the middle of the afternoon, where it was a decent-sized trout stream. It turned out to be one of those dark mountain brooks created by countless ice-cold springs, thriving in the shade, and covered, so to speak, with thick mats of moss that every camper remembers. The fish are as dark as the stream and very skittish. They dart out from under the mossy rocks or dive after the hook into the murky depths—a vital part of the silence and shadows. The enchantment of the moss surrounds everything. The fisherman moves silently as he hops from stone to stone and ledge to ledge along the stream's bed. It feels so refreshing! He looks up the dark, quiet ravine, hears the solitary sound of the water, sees the decayed trunks of fallen trees crossing the stream, and all the dreams he had as a boy about the lairs of predators—the crouching feline creatures, especially if it's near dusk and the shadows in the woods are deepening—come back to him vividly. He continues on, cautious and alert, speaking to his friends in hushed tones.

After an hour or so the trout became less abundant, and with nearly a hundred of the black sprites in our baskets we turned back. Here and there I saw the abandoned nests of the pigeons, sometimes half a dozen in one tree. In a yellow birch which the floods had uprooted, a number of nests were still in place, little shelves or platforms of twigs loosely arranged, and affording little or no protection to the eggs or the young birds against inclement weather.

After about an hour, the trout became less plentiful, and with almost a hundred of the black fish in our baskets, we headed back. Here and there, I noticed the abandoned nests of the pigeons, sometimes half a dozen in one tree. In a yellow birch that the floods had taken down, several nests were still intact, small shelves or platforms made of twigs loosely put together, offering little to no protection for the eggs or the young birds against harsh weather.

Before we had reached our companions the rain set in again and forced us to take shelter under a balsam. When it slackened we moved on and soon came up with Aaron, who had caught his first trout, and, considerably drenched, was making his way toward camp, which one of the party had gone forward to build. After traveling less than a mile, we saw a smoke struggling up through the dripping trees, and in a few moments were all standing round a blazing fire. But the rain now commenced again, and fairly poured down through the trees, rendering the prospect of cooking and eating our supper there in the woods, and of passing the night on the ground without tent or cover of any kind, rather disheartening. We had been told of a bark shanty a couple of miles farther down the creek, and thitherward we speedily took up our line of march. When we were on the point of discontinuing the search, thinking we had been misinformed or had passed it by, we came in sight of a bark-peeling, in the midst of which a small log house lifted its naked rafters toward the now breaking sky. It had neither floor nor roof, and was less inviting on first sight than the open woods. But a board partition was still standing, out of which we built a rude porch on the east side of the house, large enough for us all to sleep under if well packed, and eat under if we stood up. There was plenty of well-seasoned timber lying about, and a fire was soon burning in front of our quarters that made the scene social and picturesque, especially when the frying-pans were brought into requisition, and the coffee, in charge of Aaron, who was an artist in this line, mingled its aroma with the wild-wood air. At dusk a balsam was felled, and the tips of the branches used to make a bed, which was more fragrant than soft; hemlock is better, because its needles are finer and its branches more elastic.

Before we reached our friends, it started raining again, forcing us to take shelter under a balsam tree. When the rain eased, we moved on and soon caught up with Aaron, who had just caught his first trout and, thoroughly soaked, was heading toward the campsite that one of the group had gone ahead to set up. After traveling less than a mile, we spotted smoke rising through the wet trees, and moments later, we were all gathered around a roaring fire. But the rain started pouring down again, drenching everything and making the idea of cooking and eating our dinner in the woods, as well as spending the night on the ground without a tent or any cover, pretty discouraging. We had heard about a bark shanty a couple of miles further down the creek, so we quickly set off in that direction. Just as we were about to give up the search, thinking we might have been misled or passed it without noticing, we spotted a bark-peeling, where a small log house stood with its bare rafters reaching for the sky, which was just starting to clear. It had no floor or roof and looked less inviting at first than the open woods. However, a board partition was still intact, and we used it to create a makeshift porch on the east side of the house, big enough for all of us to sleep under if we packed in tightly, and to eat under if we stood up. There was plenty of well-seasoned timber around, and we quickly got a fire going in front of our makeshift quarters, making the scene cozy and picturesque, especially when we brought out the frying pans and Aaron, who was a pro at making coffee, filled the air with its aroma mingling with the fresh scent of the woods. At dusk, we cut down a balsam tree and used the tips of the branches to make a bed, which smelled nice but wasn’t very soft; hemlock would have been better since its needles are finer and its branches more flexible.

There was a spirt or two of rain during the night, but not enough to find out the leaks in our roof. It took the shower or series of showers of the next day to do that. They commenced about two o’clock in the afternoon. The forenoon had been fine, and we had brought into camp nearly three hundred trout; but before they were half dressed, or the first panfuls fried, the rain set in. First came short, sharp dashes, then a gleam of treacherous sunshine, followed by more and heavier dashes. The wind was in the southwest, and to rain seemed the easiest thing in the world. From fitful dashes to a steady pour the transition was natural. We stood huddled together, stark and grim, under our cover, like hens under a cart. The fire fought bravely for a time, and retaliated with sparks and spiteful tongues of flame; but gradually its spirit was broken, only a heavy body of coal and half-consumed logs in the centre holding out against all odds. The simmering fish were soon floating about in a yellow liquid that did not look in the least appetizing. Point after point gave way in our cover, till standing between the drops was no longer possible. The water coursed down the underside of the boards, and dripped in our necks and formed puddles on our hat-brims. We shifted our guns and traps and viands, till there was no longer any choice of position, when the loaves and the fishes, the salt and the sugar, the pork and the butter, shared the same watery fate. The fire was gasping its last. Little rivulets coursed about it, and bore away the quenched but steaming coals on their bosoms. The spring run in the rear of our camp swelled so rapidly that part of the trout that had been hastily left lying on its banks again found themselves quite at home. For over two hours the floods came down. About four o’clock Orville, who had not yet come from the day’s sport, appeared. To say Orville was wet is not much; he was better than that,—he had been washed and rinsed in at least half a dozen waters, and the trout that he bore dangling at the end of a string hardly knew that they had been out of their proper element.

There was a little bit of rain during the night, but not enough to discover the leaks in our roof. It took the rain showers the next day to do that. They started around two o'clock in the afternoon. The morning had been nice, and we had caught nearly three hundred trout; but before we were even halfway through cleaning them or frying the first panful, the rain began. First, there were brief, sharp bursts, then a deceptive flash of sunshine, followed by heavier and more constant rain. The wind was coming from the southwest, and rain seemed inevitable. The shift from sporadic drops to a steady downpour felt natural. We huddled together, wet and grim, under our shelter, like chickens under a cart. The fire fought valiantly for a while, spitting out sparks and stubborn flames; but gradually it lost its strength, leaving just a mass of coals and half-burned logs in the center, struggling against the odds. The simmering fish soon floated in a yellow liquid that looked far from appetizing. Point after point of our shelter gave way, until it was no longer possible to stand between the drops. Water ran down the underside of the boards, dripped down our necks, and pooled on our hat brims. We moved our guns, traps, and food around until there was no good spot left, and everything—the bread, the fish, the salt, the sugar, the pork, and the butter—ended up soaked. The fire was taking its last breaths. Little streams flowed around it, carrying away the extinguished but steaming coals. The spring runoff behind our camp rose so quickly that some of the trout we had hastily left on the bank found themselves back in their natural habitat. For over two hours, the rain poured down. Around four o'clock, Orville, who had not yet returned from fishing, showed up. Saying Orville was wet doesn’t capture it—he was drenched, having been soaked and rinsed in at least half a dozen streams, and the trout he had on a string were barely aware they had been out of water.

But he brought welcome news. He had been two or three miles down the creek, and had seen a log building,—whether house or stable he did not know, but it had the appearance of having a good roof, which was inducement enough for us instantly to leave our present quarters. Our course lay along an old wood-road, and much of the time we were to our knees in water. The woods were literally flooded everywhere. Every little rill and springlet ran like a mill-tail, while the main stream rushed and roared, foaming, leaping, lashing, its volume increased fifty-fold. The water was not roily, but of a rich coffee-color, from the leachings of the woods. No more trout for the next three days! we thought, as we looked upon the rampant stream.

But he brought good news. He had gone two or three miles down the creek and spotted a log building—whether it was a house or a stable, he wasn't sure, but it looked like it had a solid roof, which was enough to motivate us to leave our current spot right away. We took an old wood road, and most of the time, we were up to our knees in water. The woods were completely flooded. Every little stream and spring flowed like a milltail, while the main river rushed and roared, foaming, leaping, and lashing, with its volume increased five-fold. The water wasn't muddy, but had a rich coffee color from the leachings of the woods. No more trout for the next three days! we thought as we looked at the raging stream.

After we had labored and floundered along for about an hour, the road turned to the left, and in a little stumpy clearing near the creek a gable uprose on our view. It did not prove to be just such a place as poets love to contemplate. It required a greater effort of the imagination than any of us were then capable of to believe it had ever been a favorite resort of wood-nymphs or sylvan deities. It savored rather of the equine and the bovine. The bark-men had kept their teams there, horses on the one side and oxen on the other, and no Hercules had ever done duty in cleansing the stables. But there was a dry loft overhead with some straw, where we might get some sleep, in spite of the rain and the midges; a double layer of boards, standing at a very acute angle, would keep off the former, while the mingled refuse hay and muck beneath would nurse a smoke that would prove a thorough protection against the latter. And then, when Jim, the two-handed, mounting the trunk of a prostrate maple near by, had severed it thrice with easy and familiar stroke, and, rolling the logs in front of the shanty, had kindled a fire, which, getting the better of the dampness, soon cast a bright glow over all, shedding warmth and light even into the dingy stable, I consented to unsling my knapsack and accept the situation. The rain had ceased, and the sun shone out behind the woods. We had trout sufficient for present needs; and after my first meal in an ox-stall, I strolled out on the rude log bridge to watch the angry Neversink rush by. Its waters fell quite as rapidly as they rose, and before sundown it looked as if we might have fishing again on the morrow. We had better sleep that night than either night before, though there were two disturbing causes,—the smoke in the early part of it, and the cold in the latter. The “no-see-ems” left in disgust; and, though disgusted myself, I swallowed the smoke as best I could, and hugged my pallet of straw the closer. But the day dawned bright, and a plunge in the Neversink set me all right again. The creek, to our surprise and gratification, was only a little higher than before the rain, and some of the finest trout we had yet seen we caught that morning near camp.

After we had struggled along for about an hour, the road turned left, and in a small clearing by the creek, a gable came into view. It wasn't the kind of place poets would typically dream about. It took more imagination than any of us had at that moment to believe it had ever been a favorite spot for wood nymphs or forest gods. It felt more like a place for horses and cows. The timbermen had kept their teams there, with horses on one side and oxen on the other, and no Hercules had ever come to clean the stables. But there was a dry loft above with some straw, where we could get some sleep despite the rain and the midges; a double layer of boards, standing at a sharp angle, would keep out the rain, while the mixed hay and muck below would make smoke that would fend off the midges. Then, when Jim, the two-handed, climbed up a fallen maple nearby, and easily cut it three times with familiar strokes, and rolled the logs in front of the shanty to start a fire, which quickly overcame the dampness and cast a bright glow everywhere, bringing warmth and light even into the dingy stable, I agreed to take off my backpack and accept the situation. The rain had stopped, and the sun was shining through the trees. We had enough trout for our current needs, and after my first meal in an ox stall, I walked out on the rough log bridge to watch the angry Neversink rush by. Its waters fell as quickly as they rose, and before sunset, it seemed we might have fishing again the next day. We slept better that night than on either night before, even though there were two distractions—the smoke at first, and the cold later. The "no-see-ums" left in disgust; and although I was also annoyed, I breathed in the smoke as best I could and huddled closer to my straw bed. But dawn came bright, and a dip in the Neversink refreshed me. To our surprise and pleasure, the creek was only a bit higher than before the rain, and that morning we caught some of the best trout we had seen yet near the camp.

We tarried yet another day and night at the old stable, but taking our meals outside squatted on the ground, which had now become quite dry. Part of the day I spent strolling about the woods, looking up old acquaintances among the birds, and, as always, half expectant of making some new ones. Curiously enough, the most abundant species were among those I had found rare in most other localities, namely, the small water-wagtail, the mourning ground warbler, and the yellow-bellied woodpecker. The latter seems to be the prevailing woodpecker through the woods of this region.

We stayed another day and night at the old stable, eating our meals outside while sitting on the now dry ground. I spent part of the day walking around the woods, reconnecting with familiar birds and, as always, hoping to spot some new ones. Interestingly, the most common species here were the ones I had usually found to be rare in other places, including the small water-wagtail, the mourning ground warbler, and the yellow-bellied woodpecker. The latter appears to be the dominant woodpecker in the woods of this area.

That night the midges, those motes that sting, held high carnival. We learned afterward, in the settlement below and from the barkpeelers, that it was the worst night ever experienced in that valley. We had done no fishing during the day, but had anticipated some fine sport about sundown. Accordingly Aaron and I started off between six and seven o’clock, one going upstream and the other down. The scene was charming. The sun shot up great spokes of light from behind the woods, and beauty, like a presence, pervaded the atmosphere. But torment, multiplied as the sands of the seashore, lurked in every tangle and thicket. In a thoughtless moment I removed my shoes and socks, and waded in the water to secure a fine trout that had accidentally slipped from my string and was helplessly floating with the current. This caused some delay and gave the gnats time to accumulate. Before I had got one foot half dressed I was enveloped in a black mist that settled upon my hands and neck and face, filling my ears with infinitesimal pipings and covering my flesh with infinitesimal bitings. I thought I should have to flee to the friendly fumes of the old stable, with “one stocking off and one stocking on;” but I got my shoe on at last, though not without many amusing interruptions and digressions.

That night, the midges, those annoying little bugs that sting, were out in full force. Later, we found out from the people in the settlement below and from the barkpeelers that it was the worst night ever experienced in that valley. We hadn't done any fishing during the day but were looking forward to some great fishing around sunset. So, Aaron and I set off between six and seven o'clock, with one heading upstream and the other downstream. The scenery was beautiful. The sun sent out bright rays of light from behind the woods, and a sense of beauty filled the air. But torment, multiplied like grains of sand on the beach, hid in every bush and thicket. In a careless moment, I took off my shoes and socks and waded into the water to grab a nice trout that had slipped off my line and was floating helplessly. This took some time and allowed the gnats to gather. Before I had one foot halfway dressed, I was surrounded by a black cloud that settled on my hands, neck, and face, filling my ears with tiny buzzing sounds and covering my skin with tiny bites. I thought I would have to escape to the welcoming smell of the old stable, with “one stocking off and one stocking on;” but I finally got my shoe on, though not without many funny interruptions and distractions.

In a few moments after this adventure I was in rapid retreat toward camp. Just as I reached the path leading from the shanty to the creek, my companion in the same ignoble flight reached it also, his hat broken and rumpled, and his sanguine countenance looking more sanguinary than I had ever before seen it, and his speech, also, in the highest degree inflammatory. His face and forehead were as blotched and swollen as if he had just run his head into a hornets’ nest, and his manner as precipitate as if the whole swarm was still at his back.

In just a few moments after this adventure, I was quickly heading back to camp. As I got to the path leading from the cabin to the creek, my companion—also in a shameful retreat—arrived as well. His hat was broken and disheveled, and his pale face looked more bloodied than I had ever seen it, with his words incredibly heated. His face and forehead were blotchy and swollen, as if he had just crashed into a hornet's nest, and he acted as if the entire swarm was still chasing him.

No smoke or smudge which we ourselves could endure was sufficient in the earlier part of that evening to prevent serious annoyance from the same cause; but later a respite was granted us.

No smoke or mess that we could handle was enough earlier that evening to keep us from being really annoyed by the same issue; but later, we got a break.

About ten o’clock, as we stood round our camp-fire, we were startled by a brief but striking display of the aurora borealis. My imagination had already been excited by talk of legends and of weird shapes and appearances, and when, on looking up toward the sky, I saw those pale, phantasmal waves of magnetic light chasing each other across the little opening above our heads, and at first sight seeming barely to clear the treetops, I was as vividly impressed as if I had caught a glimpse of a veritable spectre of the Neversink. The sky shook and trembled like a great white curtain.

About ten o’clock, as we gathered around our campfire, we were taken aback by a brief but stunning display of the northern lights. My imagination was already fired up by stories of legends and strange shapes. When I looked up at the sky and saw those pale, ghostly waves of magnetic light swirling over us, initially seeming to barely clear the treetops, I was deeply moved, as if I’d seen a real ghost from the Neversink. The sky shook and rippled like a huge white curtain.

After we had climbed to our loft and had lain down to sleep, another adventure befell us. This time a new and uninviting customer appeared upon the scene, the genius loci of the old stable, namely, the “fretful porcupine.” We had seen the marks and work of these animals about the shanty, and had been careful each night to hang our traps, guns, etc., beyond their reach, but of the prickly night-walker himself we feared we should not get a view.

After we climbed up to our loft and lay down to sleep, another adventure happened. This time, an unwelcome visitor showed up, the genius loci of the old stable, known as the “fretful porcupine.” We had noticed the signs and activities of these creatures around the cabin, and had been careful each night to hang our traps, guns, and other gear out of their reach, but we worried that we wouldn’t actually see the prickly night-walker himself.

We had lain down some half hour, and I was just on the threshold of sleep, ready, as it were, to pass through the open door into the land of dreams, when I heard outside somewhere that curious sound,—a sound which I had heard every night I spent in these woods, not only on this but on former expeditions, and which I had settled in my mind as proceeding from the porcupine, since I knew the sounds our other common animals were likely to make,—a sound that might be either a gnawing on some hard, dry substance, or a grating of teeth, or a shrill grunting.

We had been lying down for about half an hour, and I was just about to drift off to sleep, ready to step through the open door into the dream world, when I heard that strange sound outside—a sound I had heard every night I spent in these woods, not just on this trip but on past ones too. I had concluded that it came from a porcupine since I recognized the sounds other common animals made. It was a noise that could have been either gnawing on something hard and dry, the grating of teeth, or a sharp grunt.

Orville heard it also, and, raising up on his elbow, asked, “What is that?”

Orville heard it too and, propping himself up on his elbow, asked, “What is that?”

“What the hunters call a ‘porcupig,’” said I.

“What the hunters call a ‘porcupig,’” I said.

“Sure?”

"Are you sure?"

“Entirely so.”

“Absolutely.”

“Why does he make that noise?”

“Why is he making that noise?”

“It is a way he has of cursing our fire,” I replied. “I heard him last night also.”

“It’s his way of cursing our fire,” I replied. “I heard him last night too.”

“Where do you suppose he is?” inquired my companion, showing a disposition to look him up.

“Where do you think he is?” my friend asked, eager to go find him.

“Not far off, perhaps fifteen or twenty yards from our fire, where the shadows begin to deepen.”

“Not far away, maybe fifteen or twenty yards from our fire, where the shadows start to get darker.”

Orville slipped into his trousers, felt for my gun, and in a moment had disappeared down through the scuttle hole. I had no disposition to follow him, but was rather annoyed than otherwise at the disturbance. Getting the direction of the sound, he went picking his way over the rough, uneven ground, and, when he got where the light failed him, poking every doubtful object with the end of his gun. Presently he poked a light grayish object, like a large round stone, which surprised him by moving off. On this hint he fired, making an incurable wound in the “porcupig,” which, nevertheless, tried harder than ever to escape. I lay listening, when, close on the heels of the report of the gun, came excited shouts for a revolver. Snatching up my Smith and Wesson, I hastened, shoeless and hatless, to the scene of action, wondering what was up. I found my companion struggling to detain, with the end of the gun, an uncertain object that was trying to crawl off into the darkness. “Look out!” said Orville, as he saw my bare feet, “the quills are lying thick around here.”

Orville slipped into his pants, felt for my gun, and soon vanished down through the scuttle hole. I didn't feel like following him, but I was more annoyed than anything else at the disturbance. Following the sound, he navigated the rough, uneven ground, and when the light faded, he poked at anything that seemed suspicious with the end of his gun. Eventually, he poked a light grayish object that looked like a large round stone, which surprised him by moving away. Taking this cue, he fired, inflicting a serious wound on the "porcupig," which, despite this, struggled harder than ever to escape. I lay there listening when, immediately after the gunshot, excited shouts for a revolver erupted. Grabbing my Smith and Wesson, I rushed, barefoot and hatless, to the scene, curious about what was happening. I found my companion trying to hold back an uncertain object that was attempting to crawl away into the darkness with the end of his gun. “Watch out!” Orville said when he saw my bare feet, “the quills are everywhere around here.”

And so they were; he had blown or beaten them nearly all off the poor creature’s back, and was in a fair way completely to disable my gun, the ramrod of which was already broken and splintered clubbing his victim. But a couple of shots from the revolver, sighted by a lighted match, at the head of the animal, quickly settled him.

And so they were; he had nearly knocked or beaten all of them off the poor creature’s back, and was well on his way to completely disable my gun, the ramrod of which was already broken and splintered from hitting his victim. But a couple of shots from the revolver, aimed with the help of a lit match at the animal's head, quickly took care of him.

He proved to be an unusually large Canada porcupine,—an old patriarch, gray and venerable, with spines three inches long, and weighing, I should say, twenty pounds. The build of this animal is much like that of the woodchuck, that is, heavy and pouchy. The nose is blunter than that of the woodchuck, the limbs stronger, and the tail broader and heavier. Indeed, the latter appendage is quite club-like, and the animal can, no doubt, deal a smart blow with it. An old hunter with whom I talked thought it aided them in climbing. They are inveterate gnawers, and spend much of their time in trees gnawing the bark. In winter one will take up its abode in a hemlock, and continue there till the tree is quite denuded. The carcass emitted a peculiar, offensive odor, and, though very fat, was not in the least inviting as game. If it is part of the economy of nature for one animal to prey upon some other beneath it, then the poor devil has indeed a mouthful that makes a meal off the porcupine. Panthers and lynxes have essayed it, but have invariably left off at the first course, and have afterwards been found dead, or nearly so, with their heads puffed up like a pincushion, and the quills protruding on all sides. A dog that understands the business will manƓuvre round the porcupine till he gets an opportunity to throw it over on its back, when he fastens on its quilless underbody. Aaron was puzzled to know how long-parted friends could embrace, when it was suggested that the quills could be depressed or elevated at pleasure.

He turned out to be an unusually large Canada porcupine—an old guy, gray and wise, with three-inch-long quills, weighing around twenty pounds. This animal's body is similar to that of a woodchuck, meaning it's heavy and plump. Its nose is blunter than a woodchuck’s, its limbs are stronger, and its tail is wider and heavier. In fact, the tail is quite club-like, and it could definitely deliver a strong hit with it. An experienced hunter I spoke to thought it might help them climb. They are relentless gnawers and often spend loads of time in trees chewing on the bark. In winter, one can make its home in a hemlock and stay there until the tree is completely stripped bare. The carcass gives off a unique, unpleasant smell, and even though it’s very fatty, it’s not appealing as game. If it’s part of nature for one animal to prey on another, then that poor creature has quite a hefty meal in the porcupine. Panthers and lynxes have tried it but always give up after the first bite, often ending up dead or nearly dead with their heads swollen like a pincushion, quills sticking out all over. A dog that knows what it's doing will maneuver around the porcupine until it gets a chance to flip it over onto its back, then it bites the quill-free belly. Aaron was confused about how long-separated friends could hug when it was suggested that the quills could be lowered or raised at will.

The next morning boded rain; but we had become thoroughly sated with the delights of our present quarters, outside and in, and packed up our traps to leave. Before we had reached the clearing, three miles below, the rain set in, keeping up a lazy, monotonous drizzle till the afternoon.

The next morning looked like it was going to rain; but we were completely satisfied with the comforts of where we were, both outside and inside, and packed up our stuff to leave. Before we reached the clearing, three miles down, the rain started, drizzling lazily and monotonously until the afternoon.

The clearing was quite a recent one, made mostly by barkpeelers, who followed their calling in the mountains round about in summer, and worked in their shops making shingle in winter. The Biscuit Brook came in here from the west,—a fine, rapid trout stream six or eight miles in length, with plenty of deer in the mountains about its head. On its banks we found the house of an old woodman, to whom we had been directed for information about the section we proposed to traverse.

The clearing was pretty new, mainly created by bark peelers who spent their summers working in the nearby mountains and made shingles in their shops during the winter. The Biscuit Brook flowed in from the west—a great, fast-moving trout stream about six or eight miles long, with plenty of deer in the mountains nearby. Along its banks, we found the home of an old woodworker, who we were told could give us some information about the area we planned to explore.

“Is the way very difficult,” we inquired, “across from the Neversink into the head of the Beaver-kill?”

“Is the way very difficult,” we asked, “to cross from the Neversink into the head of the Beaver-kill?”

“Not to me; I could go it the darkest night ever was. And I can direct you so you can find the way without any trouble. You go down the Neversink about a mile, when you come to Highfall Brook, the first stream that comes down on the right. Follow up it to Jim Reed’s shanty, about three miles. Then cross the stream, and on the left bank, pretty well up on the side of the mountain, you will find a wood-road, which was made by a fellow below here who stole some ash logs off the top of the ridge last winter and drew them out on the snow. When the road first begins to tilt over the mountain, strike down to your left, and you can reach the Beaverkill before sundown.”

“Not for me; I could navigate the darkest night ever. And I can guide you so you’ll find your way without any issues. You go down the Neversink for about a mile until you reach Highfall Brook, the first stream that comes in on the right. Follow it up to Jim Reed’s cabin, about three miles in. Then cross the stream, and on the left bank, pretty far up the side of the mountain, you’ll find a wood road that was made by a guy down here who took some ash logs off the top of the ridge last winter and pulled them out on the snow. When the road starts to slope down the mountain, head down to your left, and you can reach the Beaverkill before sundown.”

As it was then after two o’clock, and as the distance was six or eight of these terrible hunters’ miles, we concluded to take a whole day to it, and wait till next morning. The Beaverkill flowed west, the Neversink south, and I had a mortal dread of getting entangled amid the mountains and valleys that lie in either angle.

As it was already past two o'clock, and since the distance was six or eight of those terrible hunters' miles, we decided to take the whole day to get there and wait until the next morning. The Beaverkill flowed west, the Neversink south, and I had a deep fear of getting lost in the mountains and valleys that are in either angle.

Besides, I was glad of another and final opportunity to pay my respects to the finny tribes of the Neversink. At this point it was one of the finest trout streams I had ever beheld. It was so sparkling, its bed so free from sediment or impurities of any kind, that it had a new look, as if it had just come from the hand of its Creator. I tramped along its margin upward of a mile that afternoon, part of the time wading to my knees, and casting my hook, baited only with a trout’s fin, to the opposite bank. Trout are real cannibals, and make no bones, and break none either, in lunching on each other. A friend of mine had several in his spring, when one day a large female trout gulped down one of her male friends, nearly one third her own size, and went around for two days with the tail of her liege lord protruding from her mouth! A fish’s eye will do for bait, though the anal fin is better. One of the natives here told me that when he wished to catch large trout (and I judged he never fished for any other,—I never do), he used for bait the bullhead, or dart, a little fish an inch and a half or two inches long, that rests on the pebbles near shore and darts quickly, when disturbed, from point to point. “Put that on your hook,” said he, “and if there is a big fish in the creek, he is bound to have it.” But the darts were not easily found; the big fish, I concluded, had cleaned them all out; and, then, it was easy enough to supply our wants with a fin.

Besides, I was glad for another and final chance to pay my respects to the fish of the Neversink. At this point, it was one of the finest trout streams I had ever seen. It sparkled so brightly, its bottom so clear of dirt or any impurities, that it looked brand new, as if it had just come from the hands of its Creator. I hiked along its edge for over a mile that afternoon, sometimes wading up to my knees and casting my line, baited only with a trout's fin, to the opposite bank. Trout are true cannibals, and they don't hesitate to snack on each other. A friend of mine had several trout in his pond, and one day a large female trout gulped down one of her male companions, nearly a third of her own size, and spent two days with his tail sticking out of her mouth! A fish’s eye works as bait, although the anal fin is better. One of the locals here told me that when he wanted to catch big trout (and I figured he never fished for anything else—I know I don't), he used a bullhead, or dart, a little fish about an inch and a half or two inches long, that hangs around the pebbles near the shore and quickly darts from spot to spot when disturbed. “Put that on your hook,” he said, “and if there’s a big fish in the creek, he’s bound to take it.” But the darts were hard to find; I concluded the big fish had eaten them all; and for us, it was easy enough to make do with a fin.

Declining the hospitable offers of the settlers, we spread our blankets that night in a dilapidated shingle-shop on the banks of the Biscuit Brook, first flooring the damp ground with the new shingle that lay piled in one corner. The place had a great-throated chimney with a tremendous expanse of fireplace within, that cried “More!” at every morsel of wood we gave it.

Declining the friendly offers from the settlers, we laid our blankets that night in a rundown shingle shop by the Biscuit Brook, first covering the damp ground with the new shingles stacked in one corner. The place had a huge chimney with a massive fireplace that seemed to shout “More!” with every piece of wood we threw in.

But I must hasten over this part of the ground, nor let the delicious flavor of the milk we had that morning for breakfast, and that was so delectable after four days of fish, linger on my tongue; nor yet tarry to set down the talk of that honest, weatherworn passer-by who paused before our door, and every moment on the point of resuming his way, yet stood for an hour and recited his adventures hunting deer and bears on these mountains. Having replenished our stock of bread and salt pork at the house of one of the settlers, midday found us at Reed’s shanty,—one of those temporary structures erected by the bark jobber to lodge and board his “hands” near their work. Jim not being at home, we could gain no information from the “women folks” about the way, nor from the men who had just come in to dinner; so we pushed on, as near as we could, according to the instructions we had previously received. Crossing the creek, we forced our way up the side of the mountain, through a perfect cheval-de-frise of fallen and peeled hemlocks, and, entering the dense woods above, began to look anxiously about for the wood-road. My companions at first could see no trace of it; but knowing that a casual wood-road cut in winter, when there was likely to be two or three feet of snow on the ground, would present only the slightest indications to the eye in summer, I looked a little closer, and could make out a mark or two here and there. The larger trees had been avoided, and the axe used only on the small saplings and underbrush, which had been lopped off a couple of feet from the ground. By being constantly on the alert, we followed it till near the top of the mountain; but, when looking to see it “tilt” over the other side, it disappeared altogether. Some stumps of the black cherry were found, and a solitary pair of snow-shoes was hanging high and dry on a branch, but no further trace of human hands could we see. While we were resting here a couple of hermit thrushes, one of them with some sad defect in his vocal powers which barred him from uttering more than a few notes of his song, gave voice to the solitude of the place. This was the second instance in which I have observed a song-bird with apparently some organic defect in its instrument. The other case was that of a bobolink, which, hover in mid-air and inflate its throat as it might, could only force out a few incoherent notes. But the bird in each case presented this striking contrast to human examples of the kind, that it was apparently just as proud of itself, and just as well satisfied with its performance, as were its more successful rivals.

But I need to move on from this part of the journey, nor let the delicious taste of the milk we had for breakfast that morning, which was so delightful after four days of fish, linger on my tongue; nor should I pause to jot down the conversation with that honest, weathered traveler who stopped outside our door, on the verge of continuing on his way, yet stood for an hour sharing stories of his adventures hunting deer and bears in these mountains. After replenishing our supply of bread and salt pork at one of the settlers' homes, we found ourselves at Reed’s cabin by midday—one of those temporary structures built by the bark cutter to house and feed his crew near their work. With Jim not at home, we couldn't get any information from the “women folks” about the way, nor from the men who had just come in for dinner; so we continued on, as best as we could, following the directions we had received earlier. We crossed the creek and forced our way up the mountainside, navigating through a tangled mess of fallen and stripped hemlocks, and once we entered the dense woods above, we started searching anxiously for the wood-road. At first, my companions couldn’t find any trace of it; but knowing that a casually cut wood-road in winter, when there might be two or three feet of snow on the ground, would leave only the slightest hints visible in summer, I looked a bit closer and could spot a mark or two now and then. The larger trees had been avoided, and the axe was only used on small saplings and underbrush, which had been chopped off a couple of feet from the ground. By staying alert, we followed it until near the top of the mountain; but when we looked for it to “tilt” over the other side, it completely vanished. We found some stumps of black cherry and a single pair of snowshoes hanging high and dry on a branch, but we could see no further signs of human presence. While we were resting there, a couple of hermit thrushes—one of which had some sad defect in its vocal abilities that prevented it from singing more than a few notes—echoed the solitude of the area. This was the second time I had noticed a songbird with what seemed to be an organic defect in its voice. The other instance was a bobolink, which, despite hovering in mid-air and puffing up its throat, could only manage to squeeze out a few incoherent notes. Yet in both cases, the birds showed a striking contrast to human examples—each appeared as proud of themselves and just as satisfied with their performance as their more successful counterparts.

After deliberating some time over a pocket compass which I carried, we decided upon our course, and held on to the west. The descent was very gradual. Traces of bear and deer were noted at different points, but not a live animal was seen.

After thinking for a while about a pocket compass I had, we chose our direction and continued west. The slope was very gradual. We noticed signs of bears and deer at various spots, but we didn’t see a single live animal.

About four o’clock we reached the bank of a stream flowing west. Hail to the Beaverkill! and we pushed on along its banks. The trout were plenty, and rose quickly to the hook; but we held on our way, designing to go into camp about six o’clock. Many inviting places, first on one bank, then on the other, made us linger, till finally we reached a smooth, dry place overshadowed by balsam and hemlock, where the creek bent around a little flat, which was so entirely to our fancy that we unslung our knapsacks at once. While my companions were cutting wood and making other preparations for the night, it fell to my lot, as the most successful angler, to provide the trout for supper and breakfast. How shall I describe that wild, beautiful stream, with features so like those of all other mountain streams? And yet, as I saw it in the deep twilight of those woods on that June afternoon, with its steady, even flow, and its tranquil, many-voiced murmur, it made an impression upon my mind distinct and peculiar, fraught in an eminent degree with the charm of seclusion and remoteness. The solitude was perfect, and I felt that strangeness and insignificance which the civilized man must always feel when opposing himself to such a vast scene of silence and wildness. The trout were quite black, like all wood trout, and took the bait eagerly. I followed the stream till the deepening shadows warned me to turn back. As I neared camp, the fire shone far through the trees, dispelling the gathering gloom, but blinding my eyes to all obstacles at my feet. I was seriously disturbed on arriving to find that one of my companions had cut an ugly gash in his shin with the axe while felling a tree. As we did not carry a fifth wheel, it was not just the time or place to have any of our members crippled, and I had bodings of evil. But, thanks to the healing virtues of the balsam which must have adhered to the blade of the axe, and double thanks to the court-plaster with which Orville had supplied himself before leaving home, the wounded leg, by being favored that night and the next day, gave us little trouble.

About four o’clock we reached the bank of a stream flowing west. Hail to the Beaverkill! We continued along its banks. The trout were plentiful and quickly rose to the hook, but we kept going, planning to set up camp around six o’clock. Many tempting spots, first on one bank and then on the other, made us linger until we finally found a nice, dry area shaded by balsam and hemlock. The creek curved around a little flat that was so perfect to us that we immediately took off our backpacks. While my friends were cutting wood and getting ready for the night, it fell to me, as the most successful fisherman, to catch the trout for dinner and breakfast. How do I describe that wild, beautiful stream, so similar to all other mountain streams? Yet, as I saw it in the deep twilight of those woods on that June afternoon, with its steady, even flow and its calm, many-voiced murmur, it left a distinct and unique impression on my mind, deeply filled with the charm of seclusion and remoteness. The solitude was complete, and I felt that strangeness and insignificance that a civilized person must always experience when faced with such a vast scene of silence and wilderness. The trout were quite dark, like all brook trout, and eagerly took the bait. I followed the stream until the growing shadows reminded me to head back. As I neared camp, the fire glowed brightly through the trees, pushing away the creeping darkness but blinding my eyes to the obstacles on the ground. I was seriously worried to find that one of my companions had cut a nasty gash in his shin with an axe while chopping down a tree. Since we didn't have a fifth wheel, this wasn’t the right time or place for anyone to get injured, and I had a bad feeling. Fortunately, thanks to the healing properties of the balsam that must have been on the axe blade, and double thanks to the adhesive bandage that Orville had brought from home, the injured leg gave us little trouble that night and the next day.

That night we had our first fair and square camping out,—that is, sleeping on the ground with no shelter over us but the trees,—and it was in many respects the pleasantest night we spent in the woods. The weather was perfect and the place was perfect, and for the first time we were exempt from the midges and smoke; and then we appreciated the clean new page we had to work on. Nothing is so acceptable to the camper-out as a pure article in the way of woods and waters. Any admixture of human relics mars the spirit of the scene. Yet I am willing to confess that, before we were through those woods, the marks of an axe in a tree were a welcome sight. On resuming our march next day we followed the right bank of the Beaverkill, in order to strike a stream which flowed in from the north, and which was the outlet of Balsam Lake, the objective point of that day’s march. The distance to the lake from our camp could not have been over six or seven miles; yet, traveling as we did, without path or guide, climbing up banks, plunging into ravines, making detours around swampy places, and forcing our way through woods choked up with much fallen and decayed timber, it seemed at least twice that distance, and the mid-afternoon sun was shining when we emerged into what is called the “Quaker Clearing,” ground that I had been over nine years before, and that lies about two miles south of the lake. From this point we had a well-worn path that led us up a sharp rise of ground, then through level woods till we saw the bright gleam of the water through the trees.

That night, we had our first real camping experience—sleeping on the ground with only the trees above us—and it was one of the most enjoyable nights we spent in the woods. The weather was perfect, the location was ideal, and for the first time, we were free from midges and smoke. We truly appreciated the fresh start we had. Nothing is more valuable to a camper than a pristine environment of woods and waters. Any touch of human presence disrupts the vibe of the scenery. Still, I admit that by the time we made our way through those woods, seeing the marks of an axe on a tree was a comforting sight. The next day, we continued along the right bank of the Beaverkill, aiming to find a stream flowing in from the north, which was the outlet of Balsam Lake, the goal for that day's hike. The distance to the lake from our camp couldn't have been more than six or seven miles; however, given our route—no paths or guides, climbing banks, navigating ravines, detouring around swamps, and pushing through woods filled with fallen and decaying logs—it felt at least twice that far. By the time the sun was high in the afternoon, we finally reached what’s known as the “Quaker Clearing,” an area I had visited nine years earlier, located about two miles south of the lake. From there, a well-trodden path led us up a steep incline and through level woods until we glimpsed the bright glimmer of water through the trees.

I am always struck, on approaching these little mountain lakes, with the extensive preparation that is made for them in the conformation of the ground. I am thinking of a depression, or natural basin, in the side of the mountain or on its top, the brink of which I shall reach after a little steep climbing; but instead of that, after I have accomplished the ascent, I find a broad sweep of level or gently undulating woodland that brings me after a half hour or so to the lake, which lies in this vast lap like a drop of water in the palm of a man’s hand.

I’m always amazed when I get close to these small mountain lakes by how much the land is shaped to create them. I imagine a dip or natural bowl in the mountain’s side or at its peak, which I think I’ll reach after some steep climbing. But after I make it to the top, I discover a wide stretch of flat or gently rolling forest that leads me to the lake after about half an hour. It sits there in this enormous cradle like a drop of water in a person's hand.

Balsam Lake was oval-shaped, scarcely more than half a mile long and a quarter of a mile wide, but presented a charming picture, with a group of dark gray hemlocks filling the valley about its head, and the mountains rising above and beyond. We found a bough house in good repair, also a dug-out and paddle and several floats of logs. In the dug-out I was soon creeping along the shady side of the lake, where the trout were incessantly jumping for a species of black fly, that, sheltered from the slight breeze, were dancing in swarms just above the surface of the water. The gnats were there in swarms also, and did their best toward balancing the accounts by preying upon me while I preyed upon the trout which preyed upon the flies. But by dint of keeping my hands, face, and neck constantly wet, I am convinced that the balance of blood was on my side. The trout jumped most within a foot or two of shore, where the water was only a few inches deep. The shallowness of the water, perhaps, accounted for the inability of the fish to do more than lift their heads above the surface. They came up mouths wide open, and dropped back again in the most impotent manner. Where there is any depth of water, a trout will jump several feet into the air; and where there is a solid, unbroken sheet or column, they will scale falls and dams fifteen feet high.

Balsam Lake was oval, just over half a mile long and a quarter mile wide, but it looked beautiful, with a group of dark gray hemlocks surrounding the valley at its head, and the mountains rising above and beyond. We found a well-maintained bough house, a dugout, a paddle, and several logs floating nearby. In the dugout, I quickly made my way along the shady side of the lake, where the trout were constantly jumping for a type of black fly that, sheltered from the light breeze, were swarming just above the water's surface. There were swarms of gnats too, doing their best to even the score by feasting on me while I tried to catch the trout that were after the flies. However, by keeping my hands, face, and neck wet the whole time, I’m convinced that I had the upper hand. The trout jumped most often within a foot or two of the shore, where the water was only a few inches deep. The shallow water likely explained why the fish could only lift their heads above the surface. They came up with their mouths wide open, then dropped back down in an almost helpless way. In deeper water, a trout can jump several feet into the air; and when there’s a solid, uninterrupted surface, they can leap over waterfalls and dams that are fifteen feet high.

We had the very cream and flower of our trout-fishing at this lake. For the first time we could use the fly to advantage; and then the contrast between laborious tramping along shore, on the one hand, and sitting in one end of a dug-out and casting your line right and left with no fear of entanglement in brush or branch, while you were gently propelled along, on the other, was of the most pleasing character.

We had the best of our trout fishing at this lake. For the first time, we could effectively use flies; and the difference between trudging along the shore and sitting at one end of a canoe, casting your line easily without worrying about getting snagged in brush or branches while being softly moved along, was incredibly enjoyable.

There were two varieties of trout in the lake,—what it seems proper to call silver trout and golden trout; the former were the slimmer, and seemed to keep apart from the latter. Starting from the outlet and working round on the eastern side toward the head, we invariably caught these first. They glanced in the sun like bars of silver. Their sides and bellies were indeed as white as new silver. As we neared the head, and especially as we came near a space occupied by some kind of watergrass that grew in the deeper part of the lake, the other variety would begin to take the hook, their bellies a bright gold color, which became a deep orange on their fins; and as we returned to the place of departure with the bottom of the boat strewn with these bright forms intermingled, it was a sight not soon to be forgotten. It pleased my eye so, that I would fain linger over them, arranging them in rows and studying the various hues and tints. They were of nearly a uniform size, rarely one over ten or under eight inches in length, and it seemed as if the hues of all the precious metals and stones were reflected from their sides. The flesh was deep salmon-color; that of brook trout is generally much lighter. Some hunters and fishers from the valley of the Mill Brook, whom we met here, told us the trout were much larger in the lake, though far less numerous than they used to be. Brook trout do not grow large till they become scarce. It is only in streams that have been long and much fished that I have caught them as much as sixteen inches in length.

There were two types of trout in the lake—what we could call silver trout and golden trout. The silver ones were slimmer and seemed to keep their distance from the golden ones. Starting at the outlet and moving around the eastern side toward the head, we always caught the silver trout first. They sparkled in the sun like bars of silver, with their sides and bellies as white as new silver. As we approached the head of the lake, especially near an area filled with some kind of water grass that grew in the deeper sections, the golden trout would start to bite. Their bellies were a bright gold color that deepened to orange on their fins. When we returned to our starting point, the bottom of the boat was covered in these vibrant fish, creating a sight that was hard to forget. I was so taken by it that I wanted to linger, arranging them in rows and admiring their different colors and shades. They were almost uniform in size, usually around ten inches long at most and rarely shorter than eight. It felt like the colors of all the precious metals and gems were shining from their sides. The meat was a deep salmon color, while brook trout usually have much lighter flesh. Some hunters and fishermen from the Mill Brook valley we met here told us that the trout in the lake were bigger, but far less common than they used to be. Brook trout don’t grow large until they become scarce. I’ve only caught brook trout as long as sixteen inches in streams that have been heavily fished for a long time.

The “porcupigs” were numerous about the lake, and not at all shy. One night the heat became so intolerable in our oven-shaped bough house that I was obliged to withdraw from under its cover and lie down a little to one side. Just at daybreak, as I lay rolled in my blanket, something awoke me. Lifting up my head, there was a porcupine with his forepaws on my hips. He was apparently as much surprised as I was; and to my inquiry as to what he at that moment might be looking for, he did not pause to reply, but hitting me a slap with his tail which left three or four quills in my blanket, he scampered off down the hill into the brush.

The “porcupigs” were all over the lake and completely unbothered by us. One night, the heat in our oven-shaped bough house got so unbearable that I had to move out from under its cover and lie down a bit to the side. Just at daybreak, while I was wrapped in my blanket, something woke me up. I lifted my head and saw a porcupine with his front paws on my hips. He seemed just as surprised as I was, and when I asked what he was looking for, he didn’t bother to answer. Instead, he smacked me with his tail, leaving three or four quills in my blanket, and then he bolted down the hill into the brush.

Being an observer of the birds, of course every curious incident connected with them fell under my notice. Hence, as we stood about our camp-fire one afternoon looking out over the lake, I was the only one to see a little commotion in the water, half hidden by the near branches, as of some tiny swimmer struggling to reach the shore. Rushing to its rescue in the canoe, I found a yellow-rumped warbler, quite exhausted, clinging to a twig that hung down into the water. I brought the drenched and helpless thing to camp, and, putting it into a basket, hung it up to dry. An hour or two afterward I heard it fluttering in its prison, and cautiously lifted the lid to get a better glimpse of the lucky captive, when it darted out and was gone in a twinkling. How came it in the water? That was my wonder, and I can only guess that it was a young bird that had never before flown over a pond of water, and, seeing the clouds and blue sky so perfect down there, thought it was a vast opening or gateway into another summer land, perhaps a short cut to the tropics, and so got itself into trouble. How my eye was delighted also with the redbird that alighted for a moment on a dry branch above the lake, just where a ray of light from the setting sun fell full upon it! A mere crimson point, and yet how it offset that dark, sombre background!

Being a birdwatcher, I noticed every curious incident involving them. So, one afternoon as we gathered around our campfire looking out over the lake, I was the only one to see some movement in the water, partially obscured by nearby branches, as if a small swimmer was struggling to reach the shore. I rushed to save it in the canoe and found a yellow-rumped warbler, completely exhausted, clinging to a twig that was hanging into the water. I brought the soaked and helpless bird back to camp, placed it in a basket, and hung it up to dry. A couple of hours later, I heard it fluttering around in its little cage and cautiously lifted the lid to get a better look at my lucky find when it suddenly darted out and was gone in an instant. How did it end up in the water? I wondered if it was a young bird that had never flown over a pond before, and seeing the perfect reflection of the clouds and blue sky below, it probably thought it was a vast opening leading to another summer land, maybe even a shortcut to the tropics, and got itself into trouble. My eyes were also thrilled when a redbird briefly landed on a dry branch above the lake, right where a ray of light from the setting sun illuminated it! Just a tiny splash of crimson, yet how it stood out against that dark, somber background!

I have thus run over some of the features of an ordinary trouting excursion to the woods. People inexperienced in such matters, sitting in their rooms and thinking of these things, of all the poets have sung and romancers written, are apt to get sadly taken in when they attempt to realize their dreams. They expect to enter a sylvan paradise of trout, cool retreats, laughing brooks, picturesque views, and balsamic couches, instead of which they find hunger, rain, smoke, toil, gnats, mosquitoes, dirt, broken rest, vulgar guides, and salt pork; and they are very apt not to see where the fun comes in. But he who goes in a right spirit will not be disappointed, and will find the taste of this kind of life better, though bitterer, than the writers have described.

I’ve gone over some of the aspects of a typical fishing trip to the woods. People who are new to this, sitting in their rooms and thinking about it, influenced by what poets have celebrated and storytellers have written, often end up feeling let down when they try to make their dreams come true. They expect to step into a paradise filled with fish, cool spots to relax, cheerful streams, beautiful views, and fragrant resting places, but instead, they encounter hunger, rain, smoke, hard work, gnats, mosquitoes, mess, sleepless nights, annoying guides, and canned meat; and they often struggle to see where the enjoyment is. However, those who approach it with the right mindset won’t be disappointed and will discover that the reality of this lifestyle is richer, even if it’s tougher, than what the writers portrayed.

VI
BIRDS AND BIRDS

I

There is an old legend which one of our poets has made use of about the bird in the brain,—a legend based, perhaps, upon the human significance of our feathered neighbors. Was not Audubon’s brain full of birds, and very lively ones, too? A person who knew him says he looked like a bird himself; keen, alert, wide-eyed. It is not unusual to see the hawk looking out of the human countenance, and one may see or have seen that still nobler bird, the eagle. The song-birds might all have been brooded and hatched in the human heart. They are typical of its highest aspirations, and nearly the whole gamut of human passion and emotion is expressed more or less fully in their varied songs. Among our own birds, there is the song of the hermit thrush for devoutness and religious serenity; that of the wood thrush for the musing, melodious thoughts of twilight; the song sparrow’s for simple faith and trust, the bobolink’s for hilarity and glee, the mourning dove’s for hopeless sorrow, the vireo’s for all-day and every-day contentment, and the nocturne of the mockingbird for love. Then there are the plaintive singers, the soaring, ecstatic singers, the confident singers, the gushing and voluble singers, and the half-voiced, inarticulate singers. The note of the wood pewee is a human sigh; the chickadee has a call full of unspeakable tenderness and fidelity. There is pride in the song of the tanager, and vanity in that of the catbird. There is something distinctly human about the robin; his is the note of boyhood. I have thoughts that follow the migrating fowls northward and southward, and that go with the sea-birds into the desert of the ocean, lonely and tireless as they. I sympathize with the watchful crow perched yonder on that tree, or walking about the fields. I hurry outdoors when I hear the clarion of the wild gander; his comrade in my heart sends back the call.

There’s an old legend that one of our poets used about the bird in the brain—maybe based on the significance of our feathered friends. Wasn’t Audubon’s mind filled with birds, and really lively ones at that? Someone who knew him said he looked like a bird himself; sharp, alert, and wide-eyed. It’s not unusual to see the hawk reflected in a human face, and you might also see, or have seen, that even nobler bird, the eagle. The songbirds could all have been nurtured and raised in the human heart. They represent our highest hopes, and nearly the entire range of human passion and emotion is expressed, to varying degrees, in their diverse songs. Among our own birds, there’s the song of the hermit thrush for devotion and peacefulness; the wood thrush for the reflective, melodic thoughts of dusk; the song sparrow’s tune for simple faith and trust, the bobolink’s for joy and happiness, the mourning dove’s for deep sadness, the vireo’s for everyday contentment, and the nocturne of the mockingbird for love. Then there are the mournful singers, the soaring, ecstatic singers, the confident singers, the enthusiastic and talkative singers, and the half-voiced, inarticulate singers. The call of the wood pewee sounds like a human sigh; the chickadee has a call filled with unspeakable warmth and loyalty. There’s pride in the song of the tanager, and a sense of vanity in that of the catbird. There’s something very human about the robin; his song captures the essence of boyhood. I have thoughts that follow the migrating birds north and south, and that accompany the seabirds into the ocean's vastness, lonely and tireless like them. I feel for the watchful crow sitting over there in that tree or wandering around the fields. I rush outside when I hear the call of the wild gander; his companion in my heart echoes back the call.

II

Here comes the cuckoo, the solitary, the joyless, enamored of the privacy of his own thoughts; when did he fly away out of this brain? The cuckoo is one of the famous birds, and is known the world over. He is mentioned in the Bible, and is discussed by Pliny and Aristotle. Jupiter himself once assumed the form of the cuckoo in order to take advantage of Juno’s compassion for the bird.

Here comes the cuckoo, the lonely one, the joyless, in love with the privacy of his own thoughts; when did he leave this mind? The cuckoo is one of the well-known birds, recognized all over the world. He is mentioned in the Bible and talked about by Pliny and Aristotle. Jupiter himself once took the form of a cuckoo to take advantage of Juno’s compassion for the bird.

We have only a reduced and modified cuckoo in this country. Our bird is smaller, and is much more solitary and unsocial. Its color is totally different from the Old World bird, the latter being speckled, or a kind of dominick, while ours is of the finest cinnamon-brown or drab above, and bluish white beneath, with a gloss and richness of texture in the plumage that suggests silk. The bird has also mended its manners in this country, and no longer foists its eggs and young upon other birds, but builds a nest of its own and rears its own brood like other well-disposed birds.

We have a different, smaller version of the cuckoo in this country. Our cuckoo is more solitary and less social. Its coloring is completely different from the Old World bird, which is speckled or has a kind of dominick pattern, while ours boasts a beautiful cinnamon-brown or drab color on top and bluish-white underneath, with a sheen and richness in its feathers that resembles silk. The bird has also improved its behavior here and no longer deposits its eggs and chicks in other birds' nests. Instead, it builds its own nest and raises its own young just like other good-natured birds.

The European cuckoo is evidently much more of a spring bird than ours is, much more a harbinger of the early season. He comes in April, while ours seldom appears till late in May, and hardly then appears. He is printed, as they say, but not published. Only the alert ones know he is here. This old English rhyme on the cuckoo does not apply this side the Atlantic:—

The European cuckoo is clearly much more of a spring bird than ours is, much more of a sign that the season is changing. He arrives in April, while ours rarely shows up until late in May, and even then, he’s not really around. He’s known, as they say, but not widely acknowledged. Only the observant people realize he’s here. This old English rhyme about the cuckoo doesn’t fit here across the Atlantic:—

“In April
Come he will,
In flow’ry May
He sings all day,
In leafy June
He changes his tune,
In bright July
He’s ready to fly,
In August
Go he must.”

“In April
He'll come,
In flowery May
He sings all day,
In leafy June
He changes his tune,
In bright July
He’s ready to fly,
In August
He has to go.”

Our bird must go in August, too, but at no time does he sing all day. Indeed, his peculiar guttural call has none of the character of a song. It is a solitary, hermit-like sound, as if the bird were alone in the world, and called upon the Fates to witness his desolation. I have never seen two cuckoos together, and I have never heard their call answered; it goes forth into the solitudes unreclaimed. Like a true American, the bird lacks animal spirits and a genius for social intercourse. One August night I heard one calling, calling, a long time, not far from my house. It was a true night sound, more fitting then than by day.

Our bird has to leave in August too, but it never sings all day. In fact, its strange, guttural call isn’t really a song at all. It’s a lonely, hermit-like sound, as if the bird is the only one in the world, crying out for the Fates to witness its sadness. I’ve never seen two cuckoos together, and I’ve never heard anyone respond to their call; it disappears into the wild, unanswered. Like a true American, the bird lacks energy and a knack for socializing. One August night, I heard one calling and calling for a long time, not far from my house. It was a true night sound, more appropriate then than during the day.

The European cuckoo, on the other hand, seems to be a joyous, vivacious bird. Wordsworth applies to it the adjective “blithe,” and says:—

The European cuckoo, in contrast, appears to be a cheerful, lively bird. Wordsworth describes it as “blithe,” and says:—

“I hear thee babbling to the vale
Of sunshine and of flowers.”

“I hear you chatting to the valley
Of sunshine and flowers.”

English writers all agree that its song is animated and pleasing, and the outcome of a light heart. Thomas Hardy, whose touches always seem true to nature, describes in one of his books an early summer scene from amid which “the loud notes of three cuckoos were resounding through the still air.” This is totally unlike our bird, which does not sing in concert, but affects remote woods, and is most frequently heard in cloudy weather. Hence the name of rain-crow that is applied to him in some parts of the country. I am more than half inclined to believe that his call does indicate rain, as it is certain that of the tree-toad does.

English writers all agree that its song is lively and enjoyable, a reflection of a cheerful heart. Thomas Hardy, whose observations always feel true to nature, describes in one of his books an early summer scene where “the loud notes of three cuckoos were echoing through the still air.” This is completely different from our bird, which doesn’t sing in harmony but prefers secluded woods and is most often heard during overcast weather. That’s why some regions call it the rain-crow. I’m more than half convinced that its call does signal rain, just like the tree-toad's definitely does.

The cuckoo has a slender, long-drawn-out appearance on account of the great length of tail. It is seldom seen about farms or near human habitations until the June canker-worm appears, when it makes frequent visits to the orchard. It loves hairy worms, and has eaten so many of them that its gizzard is lined with hair.

The cuckoo has a slim, elongated look because of its long tail. It's rarely spotted around farms or close to human homes until the June cankerworm shows up, at which point it makes regular visits to the orchard. It enjoys hairy worms and has eaten so many that its gizzard is lined with hair.

The European cuckoo builds no nest, but puts its eggs out to be hatched, as does our cow blackbird, and our cuckoo is master of only the rudiments of nest-building. No other bird in the woods builds so shabby a nest; it is the merest makeshift,—a loose scaffolding of twigs through which the eggs can be seen. One season, I knew of a pair that built within a few feet of a country house that stood in the midst of a grove, but a heavy storm of rain and wind broke up the nest.

The European cuckoo doesn't build a nest; instead, it lays its eggs in other birds' nests, similar to our cow blackbird. Our cuckoo only knows the basics of nest-building. No other bird in the woods makes such a flimsy nest; it’s just a simple structure of twigs where the eggs are visible. One season, I noticed a pair that built just a few feet away from a country house situated in a grove, but a severe storm of rain and wind destroyed the nest.

If the Old World cuckoo had been as silent and retiring a bird as ours is, it could never have figured so conspicuously in literature as it does,—having a prominence that we would give only to the bobolink or to the wood thrush,—as witness his frequent mention by Shakespeare, or the following early English ballad (in modern guise):—

If the Old World cuckoo had been as quiet and shy as our cuckoo is, it wouldn't have been featured so prominently in literature as it is now—getting attention we would usually reserve for the bobolink or the wood thrush—as seen in its frequent mentions by Shakespeare, or the following early English ballad (in modern form):—

“Summer is come in,
Loud sings the cuckoo;
Groweth seed and bloweth mead,
And springs the wood now.
    Sing, cuckoo;
The ewe bleateth for her lamb,
    The cow loweth for her calf,
    The bullock starteth.
The buck verteth,
Merrily sings the cuckoo,
Cuckoo, cuckoo;
Well sings the cuckoo,
Mayest thou never cease.”

“Summer has arrived,
The cuckoo sings loudly;
Seeds are growing and meadows blooming,
And the woods are bursting into life now.
    Sing, cuckoo;
The ewe bleats for her lamb,
    The cow moos for her calf,
    The bullock jumps.
The buck bucks,
The cuckoo sings happily,
Cuckoo, cuckoo;
The cuckoo sings well,
May you never stop.”

III

I think it will be found, on the whole, that the European birds are a more hardy and pugnacious race than ours, and that their song-birds have more vivacity and power, and ours more melody and plaintiveness. In the song of the skylark, for instance, there is little or no melody, but wonderful strength and copiousness. It is a harsh strain near at hand, but very taking when showered down from a height of several hundred feet.

I believe it will be clear overall that European birds are a tougher and more aggressive species than ours, and their songbirds are more lively and powerful, while ours are more melodic and wistful. For example, in the song of the skylark, there isn’t much melody, but there is incredible strength and abundance. Up close, it sounds harsh, but it becomes quite appealing when it descends from several hundred feet up.

Daines Barrington, the naturalist of the last century, to whom White of Selborne addressed so many of his letters, gives a table of the comparative merit of seventeen leading song-birds of Europe, marking them under the heads of mellowness, sprightliness, plaintiveness, compass, and execution. In the aggregate, the songsters stand highest in sprightliness, next in compass and execution, and lowest in the other two qualities. A similar arrangement and comparison of our songsters, I think, would show an opposite result,—that is, a predominance of melody and plaintiveness. The British wren, for instance, stands in Barrington’s table as destitute of both these qualities; the reed sparrow also. Our wren-songs, on the contrary, are gushing and lyrical, and more or less melodious,—that of the winter wren being preeminently so. Our sparrows, too, all have sweet, plaintive ditties, with but little sprightliness or compass. The English house sparrow has no song at all, but a harsh chatter that is unmatched among our birds. But what a hardy, prolific, pugnacious little wretch it is! These birds will maintain themselves where our birds will not live at all, and a pair of them will lie down in the gutter and fight like dogs. Compared with this miniature John Bull, the voice and manners of our common sparrow are gentle and retiring. The English sparrow is a street gamin, our bird a timid rustic.

Daines Barrington, the naturalist from the last century, to whom White of Selborne wrote many letters, provides a table comparing the qualities of seventeen major songbirds in Europe, categorizing them by mellowness, liveliness, sadness, range, and execution. Overall, the songbirds rank highest in liveliness, followed by range and execution, with the other two qualities receiving the lowest scores. I believe a similar analysis of our songbirds would yield the opposite result—showing a predominance of melody and sadness. For instance, the British wren is listed by Barrington as lacking both qualities, as is the reed sparrow. In contrast, our wren songs are expressive and lyrical, primarily melodious, with the winter wren's song being especially so. Our sparrows also have sweet, mournful tunes, showing little liveliness or range. The English house sparrow, on the other hand, has no song at all, just a harsh chatter that is unmatched among our birds. Yet, how resilient, prolific, and feisty it is! These birds thrive where our native species cannot survive, and a pair will lie in the gutter and fight fiercely. Compared to this tiny John Bull, the voice and behavior of our common sparrow are gentle and shy. The English sparrow is a street urchin; ours is a timid country dweller.

The English robin redbreast is tallied in this country by the bluebird, which was called by the early settlers of New England the blue robin. The song of the British bird is bright and animated, that of our bird soft and plaintive.

The English robin redbreast is counted in this country as the bluebird, which early New England settlers referred to as the blue robin. The song of the British bird is lively and cheerful, while our bird's song is gentle and mournful.

The nightingale stands at the head in Barrington’s table, and is but little short of perfect in all the qualities. We have no one bird that combines such strength or vivacity with such melody. The mockingbird doubtless surpasses it in variety and profusion of notes; but falls short, I imagine, in sweetness and effectiveness. The nightingale will sometimes warble twenty seconds without pausing to breathe, and when the condition of the air is favorable, its song fills a space a mile in diameter. There are, perhaps, songs in our woods as mellow and brilliant, as is that of the closely allied species, the water-thrush; but our bird’s song has but a mere fraction of the nightingale’s volume and power.

The nightingale is at the top of Barrington’s list and is almost perfect in every way. No other bird combines such strength and liveliness with such beautiful song. The mockingbird might have more variety and a greater number of notes, but it lacks the sweetness and impact of the nightingale. The nightingale can sing continuously for twenty seconds without pausing to breathe, and when the air conditions are right, its song can fill an area a mile wide. There might be songs in our woods that are just as rich and bright as that of the closely related water-thrush, but our bird's song is only a small fraction of the nightingale's volume and power.

Strength and volume of voice, then, seem to be characteristic of the English birds, and mildness and delicacy of ours. How much the thousands of years of contact with man, and familiarity with artificial sounds, over there, have affected the bird voices, is a question. Certain it is that their birds are much more domestic than ours, and certain it is that all purely wild sounds are plaintive and elusive. Even of the bark of the fox, the cry of the panther, the voice of the coon, or the call and clang of wild geese and ducks, or the war-cry of savage tribes, is this true; but not true in the same sense of domesticated or semi-domesticated animals and fowls. How different the voice of the common duck or goose from that of the wild species, or of the tame dove from that of the turtle of the fields and groves! Where could the English house sparrow have acquired that unmusical voice but amid the sounds of hoofs and wheels, and the discords of the street? And the ordinary notes and calls of so many of the British birds, according to their biographers, are harsh and disagreeable; even the nightingale has an ugly, guttural “chuck.” The missel-thrush has a harsh scream; the jay a note like “wrack,” “wrack;” the fieldfare a rasping chatter; the blackbird, which is our robin cut in ebony, will sometimes crow like a cock and cackle like a hen; the flocks of starlings make a noise like a steam saw-mill; the white-throat has a disagreeable note; the swift a discordant scream; and the bunting a harsh song. Among our song-birds, on the contrary, it is rare to hear a harsh or displeasing voice. Even their notes of anger and alarm are more or less soft.

Strength and volume of voice seem to be typical of English birds, while mildness and delicacy define ours. It’s a question how much centuries of contact with humans and exposure to artificial sounds over there have influenced their bird voices. It’s clear that their birds are much more accustomed to people than ours, and all purely wild sounds tend to be plaintive and elusive. This is also true for the bark of a fox, the cry of a panther, the voice of a raccoon, the calls and clangs of wild geese and ducks, or the war cries of savage tribes; however, it doesn’t apply in the same way to domesticated or semi-domesticated animals and birds. Just look at how different the voice of a common duck or goose is from that of their wild counterparts, or how a tame dove differs from a field or grove turtle dove! Where else could the English house sparrow have picked up that unmusical sound but amidst the clatter of hooves and wheels, along with the noise of the streets? Many British birds have rather harsh and disagreeable calls, according to their biographers; even the nightingale has a rather ugly, guttural “chuck.” The missel-thrush has a harsh scream; the jay sounds like it's saying “wrack,” “wrack;” the fieldfare has a rasping chatter; the blackbird, which is like our robin but in black, sometimes crows like a rooster and cackles like a hen; flocks of starlings make a noise like a steam sawmill; the white-throat has an unpleasant note; the swift has a jarring scream; and the bunting has a harsh song. In contrast, among our songbirds, it’s rare to hear a harsh or unpleasant voice. Even their sounds of anger and alarm are more or less gentle.

I would not imply that our birds are the better songsters, but that their songs, if briefer and feebler, are also more wild and plaintive,—in fact, that they are softer-voiced. The British birds, as I have stated, are more domestic than ours; a much larger number build about houses and towers and outbuildings. The titmouse with us is exclusively a wood-bird; but in Britain three or four species of them resort more or less to buildings in winter. Their redstart also builds under the eaves of houses; their starling in church steeples and in holes in walls; several thrushes resort to sheds to nest; and jackdaws breed in the crannies of the old architecture, and this in a much milder climate than our own.

I’m not saying that our birds are better singers, but their songs, while shorter and weaker, are also more wild and mournful—in fact, they have softer voices. The British birds, as I mentioned before, are more domesticated than ours; a much larger number build around houses, towers, and outbuildings. The titmouse in our area is strictly a wood bird, but in Britain, three or four species often seek out buildings in the winter. Their redstart also builds under the eaves of houses; their starling in church steeples and in wall holes; several thrushes nest in sheds; and jackdaws breed in the crevices of old buildings, and this all happens in a much milder climate than ours.

They have in that country no birds that answer to our tiny, lisping wood-warblers,—genus Dendroica,—nor to our vireos, VireonidƓ. On the other hand, they have a larger number of field-birds and semi-game-birds. They have several species like our robin; thrushes like him, and some of them larger, as the ring ouzel, the missel-thrush, the fieldfare, the throstle, the redwing, White’s thrush, the blackbird,—these, besides several species in size and habits more like our wood thrush.

They don't have any birds in that country that correspond to our small, chirpy wood-warblers, genus Dendroica, or our vireos, VireonidƓ. However, they do have a greater variety of field and semi-game birds. They have several species similar to our robin, thrushes that resemble him, and some of these are even larger, like the ring ouzel, missel-thrush, fieldfare, throstle, redwing, White’s thrush, and the blackbird. These, along with several species in size and behavior more akin to our wood thrush, can also be found there.

Several species of European birds sing at night besides the true nightingale,—not fitfully and as if in their dreams, as do a few of our birds, but continuously. They make a business of it. The sedge-bird ceases at times as if from very weariness; but wake the bird up, says White, by throwing a stick or stone into the bushes, and away it goes again in full song. We have but one real nocturnal songster, and that is the mockingbird. One can see how this habit might increase among the birds of a long-settled country like England. With sounds and voices about them, why should they be silent, too? The danger of betraying themselves to their natural enemies would be less than in our woods.

Several species of European birds sing at night besides the true nightingale—not in fits and starts like some of our birds do, but continuously. They take it seriously. The sedge-bird sometimes stops, seemingly out of exhaustion; but if you wake it up, says White, by tossing a stick or stone into the bushes, it starts singing again. We only have one true nighttime singer, and that's the mockingbird. You can see how this behavior might become more common among birds in a long-established country like England. With sounds and voices all around them, why should they stay quiet? The risk of revealing themselves to their natural predators would be less than in our forests.

That their birds are more quarrelsome and pugnacious than ours I think evident. Our thrushes are especially mild-mannered, but the missel-thrush is very bold and saucy, and has been known to fly in the face of persons who have disturbed the sitting bird. No jay nor magpie nor crow can stand before him. The Welsh call him master of the coppice, and he welcomes a storm with such a vigorous and hearty song that in some countries he is known as storm-cock. He sometimes kills the young of other birds and eats eggs,—a very unthrushlike trait. The whitethroat sings with crest erect, and attitudes of warning and defiance. The hooper is a great bully; so is the greenfinch. The wood-grouse—now extinct, I believe—has been known to attack people in the woods. And behold the grit and hardihood of that little emigrant or exile to our shores, the English sparrow! Our birds have their tilts and spats also; but the only really quarrelsome members in our family are confined to the flycatchers, as the kingbird and the great crested flycatcher. None of our song-birds are bullies.

That their birds are more aggressive and combative than ours is pretty clear. Our thrushes are especially gentle, but the missel-thrush is quite bold and cheeky, and has been known to confront people who disturb the nesting bird. No jay, magpie, or crow can compete with him. The Welsh call him the master of the thicket, and he welcomes a storm with such a strong and lively song that in some places he's known as storm-cock. He sometimes kills other birds' chicks and eats their eggs—a very uncharacteristic behavior for a thrush. The whitethroat sings with its crest raised, showing warning and defiance. The hooper is a big bully, and so is the greenfinch. The wood-grouse—now extinct, I believe—has been known to attack people in the woods. And look at the toughness and resilience of that little newcomer to our shores, the English sparrow! Our birds have their scrapes and disagreements too; but the only truly quarrelsome ones in our group are the flycatchers, like the kingbird and the great crested flycatcher. None of our songbirds are bullies.

Many of our more vigorous species, as the butcherbird, the crossbills, the pine grosbeak, the redpoll, the Bohemian chatterer, the shore lark, the longspur, the snow bunting, etc., are common to both continents.

Many of our more active species, like the butcherbird, crossbills, pine grosbeak, redpoll, Bohemian chatterer, shore lark, longspur, snow bunting, and so on, are found on both continents.

Have the Old World creatures throughout more pluck and hardihood than those that are indigenous to this continent? Behold the common mouse, how he has followed man to this country and established himself here against all opposition, overrunning our houses and barns, while the native species is rarely seen. And when has anybody seen the American rat, while his congener from across the water has penetrated to every part of the continent! By the next train that takes the family to some Western frontier, arrives this pest. Both our rat and mouse or mice are timid, harmless, delicate creatures, compared with the cunning, filthy, and prolific specimens that have fought their way to us from the Old World. There is little doubt, also, that the red fox has been transplanted to this country from Europe. He is certainly on the increase, and is fast running out the native gray species.

Do the creatures from the Old World have more courage and resilience than those native to this continent? Look at the common mouse—how it has followed humans to this country and established itself here, overcoming all opposition, overrunning our homes and barns, while the native species is rarely seen. When was the last time anyone spotted an American rat, while its relative from across the ocean has spread to every part of the continent? With the next train that carries the family to some Western frontier, this pest arrives. Both our rats and mice are timid, harmless, delicate creatures compared to the clever, dirty, and highly prolific ones that have made their way to us from the Old World. It's also highly likely that the red fox has been brought to this country from Europe. It is definitely increasing in number and is quickly driving out the native gray species.

Indeed, I have thought that all forms of life in the Old World were marked by greater prominence of type, or stronger characteristic and fundamental qualities, than with us,—coarser and more hairy and virile, and therefore more powerful and lasting. This opinion is still subject to revision, but I find it easier to confirm it than to undermine it.

Indeed, I’ve thought that all forms of life in the Old World had more distinct types, or stronger and more fundamental qualities, than what we have here—rougher, hairier, and sturdier, and therefore more powerful and enduring. I’m still open to changing my mind, but I find it easier to support this view than to challenge it.

IV

But let me change the strain and contemplate for a few moments this feathered bandit,—this bird with the mark of Cain upon him, Lanius borealis,—the great shrike or butcher-bird. Usually the character of a bird of prey is well defined; there is no mistaking him. His claws, his beak, his head, his wings, in fact his whole build, point to the fact that he subsists upon live creatures; he is armed to catch them and to slay them. Every bird knows a hawk and knows him from the start, and is on the lookout for him. The hawk takes life, but he does it to maintain his own, and it is a public and universally known fact. Nature has sent him abroad in that character, and has advised all creatures of it. Not so with the shrike; here she has concealed the character of a murderer under a form as innocent as that of the robin. Feet, wings, tail, color, head, and general form and size are all those of a songbird,—very much like that master songster, the mockingbird,—yet this bird is a regular Bluebeard among its kind. Its only characteristic feature is its beak, the upper mandible having two sharp processes and a sharp hooked point. It cannot fly away to any distance with the bird it kills, nor hold it in its claws to feed upon it. It usually impales its victim upon a thorn, or thrusts it in the fork of a limb. For the most part, however, its food seems to consist of insects,—spiders, grasshoppers, beetles, etc. It is the assassin of the small birds, whom it often destroys in pure wantonness, or merely to sup on their brains, as the Gaucho slaughters a wild cow or bull for its tongue. It is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Apparently its victims are unacquainted with its true character and allow it to approach them, when the fatal blow is given. I saw an illustration of this the other day. A large number of goldfinches in their fall plumage, together with snowbirds and sparrows, were feeding and chattering in some low bushes back of the barn. I had paused by the fence and was peeping through at them, hoping to get a glimpse of that rare sparrow, the white-crowned. Presently I heard a rustling among the dry leaves as if some larger bird was also among them. Then I heard one of the goldfinches cry out as if in distress, when the whole flock of them started up in alarm, and, circling around, settled in the tops of the larger trees. I continued my scrutiny of the bushes, when I saw a large bird, with some object in its beak, hopping along on a low branch near the ground. It disappeared from my sight for a few moments, then came up through the undergrowth into the top of a young maple where some of the finches had alighted, and I beheld the shrike. The little birds avoided him and flew about the tree, their pursuer following them with the motions of his head and body as if he would fain arrest them by his murderous gaze. The birds did not utter the cry or make the demonstration of alarm they usually do on the appearance of a hawk, but chirruped and called and flew about in a half-wondering, half-bewildered manner. As they flew farther along the line of trees the shrike followed them as if bent on further captures. I then made my way around to see what the shrike had caught, and what he had done with his prey. As I approached the bushes I saw the shrike hastening back. I read his intentions at once. Seeing my movements, he had returned for his game. But I was too quick for him, and he got up out of the brush and flew away from the locality. On some twigs in the thickest part of the bushes I found his victim,—a goldfinch. It was not impaled upon a thorn, but was carefully disposed upon some horizontal twigs,—laid upon the shelf, so to speak. It was as warm as in life, and its plumage was unruffled. On examining it I found a large bruise or break in the skin on the back of the neck, at the base of the skull. Here the bandit had no doubt griped the bird with his strong beak. The shrike’s blood-thirstiness was seen in the fact that he did not stop to devour his prey, but went in quest of more, as if opening a market of goldfinches. The thicket was his shambles, and if not interrupted, he might have had a fine display of titbits in a short time.

But let me switch gears and think for a moment about this feathered bandit—this bird marked by the mark of Cain, Lanius borealis,—the great shrike or butcher-bird. Normally, birds of prey have a clear identity; there’s no mistaking them. Their claws, beak, head, wings, and overall structure reveal that they feed on live prey; they’re equipped to catch and kill. Every bird recognizes a hawk right away and keeps an eye out for it. The hawk takes life, but does so to survive, and everyone is aware of this fact. Nature has sent it out with that role, and all creatures are informed of it. Not so with the shrike; here, nature has hidden the nature of a killer behind a form as innocent as a robin. Its feet, wings, tail, color, head, and general shape and size resemble those of a songbird—much like the great songster, the mockingbird—yet this bird is a true Bluebeard among its kind. Its only distinctive feature is its beak, which has two sharp processes and a pointed hook. It can’t fly very far with the bird it kills or hold it in its claws to eat. It usually impales its victim on a thorn or wedges it in the fork of a branch. Mostly, though, it seems to eat insects—spiders, grasshoppers, beetles, and so on. It’s an assassin of small birds, often killing them out of sheer perversion or just to feast on their brains, like a gaucho butchering a wild cow or bull just for its tongue. It’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Clearly, its victims don’t know its true nature and let it get close, until the deadly blow is struck. I witnessed an example of this the other day. A large number of goldfinches in their fall colors, along with snowbirds and sparrows, were feeding and chattering in some low bushes behind the barn. I paused by the fence and peeked through, hoping to catch a glimpse of the rare white-crowned sparrow. Soon, I heard rustling among the dry leaves as if a larger bird was also there. Then I heard one of the goldfinches cry out as if in danger, and the whole flock took off in alarm, circling around and landing in the tops of the taller trees. I continued watching the bushes, and then I saw a large bird with something in its beak, hopping along a low branch near the ground. It vanished from sight for a moment, then came up through the underbrush into the crown of a young maple where some of the finches had settled, and I spotted the shrike. The little birds kept their distance and flew around the tree, while the shrike followed with his head and body as if trying to stop them with his deadly stare. The birds didn’t give the usual alarm call when a hawk appears but chirped and flew about in a confused, half-wondering way. As they moved further along the line of trees, the shrike pursued them as if determined to catch more. I then walked around to see what the shrike had caught and what he did with his prey. As I approached the bushes, I saw the shrike hurrying back. I realized his intentions immediately. Noticing my movements, he had returned for his catch. But I was too fast for him, and he took off from the brush and flew away. On some twigs in the densest part of the bushes, I found his victim—a goldfinch. It wasn’t impaled on a thorn but was carefully arranged on some horizontal twigs—laid out like a display, so to speak. It was still warm, and its feathers were undisturbed. Upon closer inspection, I noticed a large bruise or tear in the skin at the back of its neck, near the base of its skull. There, the bandit had likely gripped the bird with his strong beak. The shrike’s thirst for blood was evident in the fact that he didn’t stop to eat his prey but went in search of more, as if he were opening a market for goldfinches. The thicket was his slaughterhouse, and if left uninterrupted, he could have had a fine array of treats in no time.

The shrike is called a butcher from his habit of sticking his meat upon hooks and points; further than that, he is a butcher because he devours but a trifle of what he slays.

The shrike is known as a butcher because of its tendency to impale its prey on thorns and sharp objects; moreover, he is a butcher because he only eats a small portion of what he kills.

A few days before, I had witnessed another little scene in which the shrike was the chief actor. A chipmunk had his den in the side of the terrace above the garden, and spent the mornings laying in a store of corn which he stole from a field ten or twelve rods away. In traversing about half this distance, the little poacher was exposed; the first cover going from his den was a large maple, where he always brought up and took a survey of the scene. I would see him spinning along toward the maple, then from it by an easy stage to the fence adjoining the corn; then back again with his booty. One morning I paused to watch him more at my leisure. He came up out of his retreat and cocked himself up to see what my motions meant. His forepaws were clasped to his breast precisely as if they had been hands, and the tips of the fingers thrust into his vest pockets. Having satisfied himself with reference to me, he sped on toward the tree. He had nearly reached it, when he turned tail and rushed for his hole with the greatest precipitation. As he neared it, I saw some bluish object in the air closing in upon him with the speed of an arrow, and, as he vanished within, a shrike brought up in front of the spot, and with spread wings and tail stood hovering a moment, and looking in, then turned and went away. Apparently it was a narrow escape for the chipmunk, and, I venture to say, he stole no more corn that morning. The shrike is said to catch mice, but it is not known to attack squirrels. He certainly could not have strangled the chipmunk, and I am curious to know what would have been the result had he overtaken him. Probably it was only a kind of brag on the part of the bird,—a bold dash where no risk was run. He simulated the hawk, the squirrel’s real enemy, and no doubt enjoyed the joke.

A few days ago, I saw another little scene starring the shrike. A chipmunk had a den on the edge of the terrace above the garden and spent his mornings gathering corn that he stole from a field about ten or twelve rods away. In crossing about half that distance, the little thief was exposed; the first cover he used on his way from his den was a large maple, where he always paused to survey the area. I'd watch him dart toward the maple, then easily move from there to the fence bordering the corn, and then back again with his loot. One morning, I took a moment to watch him more closely. He emerged from his hideaway and stood up to see what I was doing. His front paws were pressed together against his chest just like they were hands, with the tips of his fingers tucked into his vest pockets. After he was satisfied that I wasn't a threat, he hurried toward the tree. He was almost there when he suddenly turned and raced back to his hole in a panic. As he got close, I noticed a bluish object in the air speeding toward him like an arrow, and just as he disappeared inside, a shrike hovered in front of the spot, wings and tail spread, looking in for a moment before flying away. It was a narrow escape for the chipmunk, and I bet he didn't steal any more corn that morning. The shrike is said to catch mice, but it's not known to go after squirrels. He definitely couldn't have strangled the chipmunk, and I'm curious to know what would have happened if he had caught him. It was probably just some bluff on the bird's part—a bold move without any real risk. He mimicked the hawk, the chipmunk’s true enemy, and no doubt found it amusing.

On another occasion, as I was riding along a mountain road early in April, a bird started from the fence where I was passing, and flew heavily to the branch of a near apple-tree. It proved to be a shrike with a small bird in his beak. He thrust his victim into a fork of a branch, then wiped his bloody beak upon the bark. A youth who was with me, to whom I pointed out the fact, had never heard of such a thing, and was much incensed at the shrike. “Let me fire a stone at him,” said he, and jumping out of the wagon, he pulled off his mittens and fumbled about for a stone. Having found one to his liking, with great earnestness and deliberation he let drive. The bird was in more danger than I had imagined, for he escaped only by a hair’s breadth; a guiltless bird like the robin or sparrow would surely have been slain; the missile grazed the spot where the shrike sat, and cut the ends of his wings as he darted behind the branch. We could see that the murdered bird had been brained, as its head hung down toward us.

On another occasion, as I was riding along a mountain road in early April, a bird flew off from the fence next to me and landed heavily on a nearby apple tree branch. It turned out to be a shrike with a small bird in its beak. It shoved its prey into a fork of a branch, then wiped its bloody beak on the bark. A young guy with me, to whom I pointed this out, had never seen anything like it and was really angry at the shrike. “Let me throw a stone at him,” he said, and jumping out of the wagon, he took off his mittens and searched for a rock. Once he found one he liked, he threw it with a lot of focus and intent. The bird was in more danger than I had thought because it barely escaped; a harmless bird like a robin or sparrow would definitely have been killed. The stone grazed the spot where the shrike was perched and clipped the edges of its wings as it darted behind the branch. We could see that the bird it had killed was lifeless, with its head hanging down toward us.

The shrike is not a summer bird with us in the Northern States, but mainly a fall and winter one; in summer he goes farther north. I see him most frequently in November and December. I recall a morning during the former month that was singularly clear and motionless; the air was like a great drum. Apparently every sound within the compass of the horizon was distinctly heard. The explosions back in the cement quarries ten miles away smote the hollow and reverberating air like giant fists. Just as the sun first showed his fiery brow above the horizon, a gun was discharged over the river. On the instant a shrike, perched on the topmost spray of a maple above the house, set up a loud, harsh call or whistle, suggestive of certain notes of the blue jay. The note presently became a crude, broken warble. Even this scalper of the innocents had music in his soul on such a morning. He saluted the sun as a robin might have done. After he had finished, he flew away toward the east.

The shrike isn’t a summer bird in the Northern States; it mainly appears in the fall and winter, heading further north in the summer. I usually spot him most often in November and December. I remember one morning in November that was incredibly clear and still; the air felt like a huge drum. You could hear every sound within the horizon very clearly. The explosions from the cement quarries ten miles away echoed in the hollow air like giant fists. Just as the sun started to rise above the horizon, a gunshot rang out over the river. At that moment, a shrike, sitting on the highest branch of a maple tree near the house, let out a loud, harsh call that reminded me of certain notes from a blue jay. His call quickly turned into a rough, broken warble. Even this predator of the innocent had music in his soul on such a morning. He greeted the sun like a robin would. After he finished, he flew off toward the east.

The shrike is a citizen of the world, being found in both hemispheres. It does not appear that the European species differs essentially from our own. In Germany he is called the nine-killer, from the belief that he kills and sticks upon thorns nine grasshoppers a day.

The shrike is a global resident, found in both hemispheres. It seems that the European species isn't significantly different from ours. In Germany, it's known as the nine-killer, based on the belief that it kills and impales nine grasshoppers on thorns each day.

To make my portrait of the shrike more complete, I will add another trait of his described by an acute observer who writes me from western New York. He saw the bird on a bright midwinter morning when the thermometer stood at zero, and by cautious approaches succeeded in getting under the apple-tree upon which he was perched. The shrike was uttering a loud, clear note like clu-eet, clu-eet, clu-eet, and, on finding he had a listener who was attentive and curious, varied his performance and kept it up continuously for fifteen minutes. He seemed to enjoy having a spectator, and never took his eye off him. The observer approached within twenty feet of him. “As I came near,” he says, “the shrike began to scold at me, a sharp, buzzing, squeaking sound not easy to describe. After a little he came out on the end of the limb nearest me, then he posed himself, and, opening his wings a little, began to trill and warble under his breath, as it were, with an occasional squeak, and vibrating his half-open wings in time with his song.” Some of his notes resembled those of the bluebird, and the whole performance is described as pleasing and melodious.

To make my portrait of the shrike more complete, I’ll add another characteristic described by a keen observer who wrote to me from western New York. He spotted the bird on a bright midwinter morning when the temperature was zero, and cautiously approached to get under the apple tree where it was perched. The shrike was making a loud, clear sound like clu-eet, clu-eet, clu-eet, and when he realized he had an attentive listener, he varied his performance and kept it going for fifteen minutes straight. He seemed to enjoy having an audience and never took his eyes off him. The observer got within twenty feet of him. “As I got closer,” he says, “the shrike started scolding me with a sharp, buzzing, squeaking sound that’s hard to describe. After a moment, he moved to the end of the limb closest to me, then posed himself, and, slightly opening his wings, began to trill and warble softly, punctuated by an occasional squeak, while vibrating his half-open wings in rhythm with his song.” Some of his notes sounded like those of a bluebird, and the entire performance was described as pleasing and melodic.

This account agrees with Thoreau’s observation, where he speaks of the shrike “with heedless and unfrozen melody bringing back summer again.” Sings Thoreau:—

This account aligns with Thoreau’s observation, where he talks about the shrike “with careless and vibrant melody bringing summer back again.” Sings Thoreau:—

“His steady sails he never furls
    At any time o’ year,
And perching now on winter’s curls,
    He whistles in his ear.”

“His sails are always up
    No matter the time of year,
And now sitting on winter's edges,
    He whistles to himself.”

But his voice is that of a savage,—strident and disagreeable.

But his voice is that of a wild person—harsh and unpleasant.

I have often wondered how this bird was kept in check; in the struggle for existence it would appear to have greatly the advantage of other birds. It cannot, for instance, be beset with one tenth of the dangers that threaten the robin, and yet apparently there are a thousand robins to every shrike. It builds a warm, compact nest in the mountains and dense woods, and lays six eggs, which would indicate a rapid increase. The pigeon lays but two eggs, and is preyed upon by both man and beast, millions of them meeting a murderous death every year; yet always some part of the country is swarming with untold numbers of them. [Footnote: This is no longer the case. The passenger pigeon now seems on the verge of extinction (1895).] But the shrike is one of our rarest birds. I myself seldom see more than two each year, and before I became an observer of birds I never saw any.

I often wonder how this bird stays in check; in the fight for survival, it seems to have a big advantage over other birds. For example, it doesn’t face even a fraction of the dangers that threaten the robin, and yet there seem to be a thousand robins for every shrike. It builds a warm, sturdy nest in the mountains and thick woods, laying six eggs, which suggests it could multiply quickly. The pigeon lays only two eggs and is hunted by both humans and animals, with millions of them meeting a violent end each year; still, there's always some region overflowing with countless numbers of them. [Footnote: This is no longer true. The passenger pigeon now appears to be on the brink of extinction (1895).] But the shrike is one of our rarest birds. I usually see no more than two each year, and before I started observing birds, I never saw any.

In size the shrike is a little inferior to the blue jay, with much the same form. If you see an unknown bird about your orchard or fields in November or December of a bluish grayish complexion, with dusky wings and tail that show markings of white, flying rather heavily from point to point, or alighting down in the stubble occasionally, it is pretty sure to be the shrike.

In size, the shrike is slightly smaller than the blue jay, but has a similar shape. If you spot an unfamiliar bird in your orchard or fields in November or December that has a bluish-gray color, with dark wings and a tail that has white markings, flying rather clumsily from place to place or occasionally landing in the leftover crops, it’s likely to be a shrike.

V

Nature never tires of repeating and multiplying the same species. She makes a million bees, a million birds, a million mice or rats, or other animals, so nearly alike that no eye can tell one from another; but it is rarely that she issues a small and a large edition, as it were, of the same species. Yet she has done it in a few cases among the birds with hardly more difference than a foot-note added or omitted. The cedar-bird, for instance, is the Bohemian waxwing or chatterer in smaller type, copied even to the minute, wax-like appendages that bedeck the ends of the wing-quills. It is about one third smaller, and a little lighter in color, owing perhaps to the fact that it is confined to a warmer latitude, its northward range seeming to end about where that of its larger brother begins. Its flight, its note, its manners, its general character and habits, are almost identical with those of its prototype. It is confined exclusively to this continent, while the chatterer is an Old World bird as well, and ranges the northern parts of both continents. The latter comes to us from the hyperborean regions, brought down occasionally by the great cold waves that originate in those high latitudes. It is a bird of Siberian and Alaskan evergreens, and passes its life for the most part far beyond the haunts of man. I have never seen the bird, but small bands of them make excursions every winter down into our territory from British America. Audubon, I believe, saw them in Maine; other observers have seen them in Minnesota. It has the crest of the cedar-bird, the same yellow border to its tail, but is marked with white on its wings, as if a snowflake or two had adhered to it from the northern cedars and pines. If you see about the evergreens in the coldest, snowiest weather what appear to be a number of very large cherry-birds, observe them well, for the chances are that visitants from the circumpolar regions are before your door. It is a sign, also, that the frost legions of the north are out in great force and carrying all before them.

Nature never gets tired of creating and multiplying the same species. She produces a million bees, a million birds, a million mice or rats, or other animals, so similar that no eye can distinguish one from another; but it’s rare that she produces a small and a large version, as it were, of the same species. Yet she has done it a few times among birds with hardly more difference than a footnote added or omitted. The cedar-bird, for instance, is the Bohemian waxwing or chatterer in a smaller size, copied even down to the tiny, wax-like appendages that decorate the ends of the wing quills. It’s about one third smaller and slightly lighter in color, likely because it lives in a warmer area, its northern range seeming to end just where that of its larger counterpart begins. Its flight, its call, its behavior, its overall character and habits are almost identical to those of its prototype. It is found exclusively on this continent, while the chatterer is also a bird of the Old World, spreading across the northern parts of both continents. The latter migrates to us from the hyperborean regions, occasionally arriving due to the intense cold waves that come from those high latitudes. It is a bird of Siberian and Alaskan evergreens, spending most of its life far from human habitation. I have never seen the bird, but small groups of them travel down into our area from British America every winter. Audubon, I believe, saw them in Maine; other observers have seen them in Minnesota. It has the crest of the cedar-bird, the same yellow edge on its tail, but is marked with white on its wings, as if a snowflake or two had stuck to it from the northern cedars and pines. If you see what looks like a number of very large cherry-birds around the evergreens in the coldest, snowiest weather, pay close attention, because chances are that visitors from the circumpolar regions are right at your doorstep. It’s also a sign that the frost legions of the north are out in full force, pushing everything before them.

Our cedar or cherry bird is the most silent bird we have. Our neutral-tinted birds, like him, as a rule are our finest songsters; but he has no song or call, uttering only a fine bead-like note on taking flight. This note is the cedar-berry rendered back in sound. When the ox-heart cherries, which he has only recently become acquainted with, have had time to enlarge his pipe and warm his heart, I shall expect more music from him. But in lieu of music, what a pretty compensation are those minute, almost artificial-like, plumes of orange and vermilion that tip the ends of his wing quills! Nature could not give him these and a song too. She has given the hummingbird a jewel upon his throat, but no song, save the hum of his wings.

Our cedar or cherry bird is the quietest we have. Normally, our subtly colored birds, like him, are our best singers; but he has no song or call, only letting out a delicate bead-like note when he takes off. This note sounds like the cedar berry. Once he gets used to the ox-heart cherries, which will help expand his vocal capabilities and warm his heart, I expect to hear more music from him. But instead of singing, he offers a lovely trade-off with the tiny, almost artificial-looking orange and vermilion plumes at the tips of his wing feathers! Nature couldn't give him these beautiful features and a song too. She granted the hummingbird a jewel on its throat, but no song, except for the hum of its wings.

Another bird that is occasionally borne to us on the crest of the cold waves from the frozen zone, and that is repeated on a smaller scale in a permanent resident, is the pine grosbeak; his alter ego, reduced in size, is the purple finch, which abounds in the higher latitudes of the temperate zone. The color and form of the two birds are again essentially the same. The females and young males of both species are of a grayish brown like the sparrow, while in the old males this tint is imperfectly hidden beneath a coat of carmine, as if the color had been poured upon their heads, where it is strongest, and so oozed down and through the rest of the plumage. Their tails are considerably forked, their beaks cone-shaped and heavy, and their flight undulating. Those who have heard the grosbeak describe its song as similar to that of the finch, though no doubt it is louder and stronger. The finch’s instrument is a fife tuned to love and not to war. He blows a clear, round note, rapid and intricate, but full of sweetness and melody. His hardier relative with that larger beak and deeper chest must fill the woods with sounds. Audubon describes its song as exceedingly rich and full.

Another bird that occasionally arrives on the crest of the cold waves from the frozen north, and has a smaller counterpart that is a permanent resident, is the pine grosbeak; its alter ego, smaller in size, is the purple finch, which thrives in the higher latitudes of the temperate zone. The color and shape of both birds are essentially the same. The females and young males of both species are a grayish brown like a sparrow, while the older males have this color partially hidden under a coat of carmine, as if the color had been poured onto their heads, strongest there, and then dripped down through the rest of their feathers. Their tails are quite forked, their beaks are cone-shaped and heavy, and their flight is undulating. Those who have heard the grosbeak describe its song as similar to that of the finch, but it is undoubtedly louder and more powerful. The finch’s melody is like a fife tuned to love and not to battle. It produces a clear, round note that is rapid and intricate, yet full of sweetness and melody. Its hardier relative, with the larger beak and deeper chest, must fill the woods with sounds. Audubon describes its song as exceptionally rich and full.

As in the case of the Bohemian waxwing, this bird is also common to both worlds, being found through Northern Europe and Asia and the northern parts of this continent. It is the pet of the pine-tree, and one of its brightest denizens. Its visits to the States are irregular and somewhat mysterious. A great flight of them occurred in the winter of 1874-75. They attracted attention all over the country. Several other flights of them have occurred during the century. When this bird comes, it is so unacquainted with man that its tameness is delightful to behold. It thrives remarkably well in captivity, and in a couple of weeks will become so tame that it will hop down and feed out of its master’s or mistress’s hand. It comes from far beyond the region of the apple, yet it takes at once to this fruit, or rather to the seeds, which it is quick to divine, at its core.

As with the Bohemian waxwing, this bird is also found in both worlds, common across Northern Europe, Asia, and the northern regions of this continent. It's a favorite of the pine tree and one of its brightest residents. Its appearances in the States are irregular and somewhat mysterious. A significant influx happened in the winter of 1874-75, capturing attention nationwide. Several other influxes have occurred throughout the century. When this bird arrives, it's so unfamiliar with humans that its gentle nature is a joy to see. It adapts remarkably well to captivity, and within a couple of weeks, it becomes so friendly that it will hop down to eat from its owner’s hand. It hails from far beyond the apple's domain, yet it quickly takes to this fruit, especially the seeds it instinctively finds at its core.

Close akin to these two birds, and standing in the same relation to each other, are two other birds that come to us from the opposite zone,—the torrid,—namely, the blue grosbeak and his petit duplicate, the indigo-bird. The latter is a common summer resident with us,—a bird of the groves and bushy fields, where his bright song may be heard all through the long summer day. I hear it in the dry and parched August when most birds are silent, sometimes delivered on the wing and sometimes from the perch. Indeed, with me its song is as much a midsummer sound as is the brassy crescendo of the cicada. The memory of its note calls to mind the flame-like quiver of the heated atmosphere and the bright glare of the meridian sun. Its color is much more intense than that of the common bluebird, as summer skies are deeper than those of April, but its note is less mellow and tender. Its original, the blue grosbeak, is an uncertain wanderer from the south, as the pine grosbeak is from the north. I have never seen it north of the District of Columbia. It has a loud, vivacious song, of which it is not stingy, and which is a large and free rendering of the indigo’s, and belongs to summer more than to spring. The bird is colored the same as its lesser brother, the males being a deep blue and the females a modest drab. Its nest is usually placed low down, as is the indigo’s, and the male carols from the tops of the trees in its vicinity in the same manner. Indeed, the two birds are strikingly alike in every respect except in size and in habitat, and, as in each of the other cases, the lesser bird is, as it were, the point, the continuation, of the larger, carrying its form and voice forward as the reverberation carries the sound.

Close to these two birds, and standing in the same relationship to each other, are two other birds that come to us from the opposite zone—the tropics—namely, the blue grosbeak and its smaller counterpart, the indigo bunting. The latter is a common summer resident here—a bird of the groves and overgrown fields, where its bright song can be heard all through the long summer day. I hear it in the dry and parched August when most birds are quiet, sometimes singing on the wing and sometimes from a perch. To me, its song is as much a midsummer sound as the brassy crescendo of the cicada. The memory of its note brings to mind the flickering heat of the air and the bright glare of the noon sun. Its color is much more vibrant than that of the common bluebird, just as summer skies are deeper than those of April, but its note is less mellow and soft. Its counterpart, the blue grosbeak, is an unpredictable visitor from the south, much like the pine grosbeak is from the north. I have never spotted it north of the District of Columbia. It has a loud, lively song, which it shares generously, and which is a big and free rendition of the indigo's, belonging more to summer than to spring. The bird is colored similarly to its smaller sibling, with the males being a deep blue and the females a modest brown. Its nest is usually built low down, like the indigo's, and the male sings from the tops of nearby trees in the same way. In fact, the two birds are strikingly similar in every aspect except for size and habitat, and, as in each of the previous cases, the smaller bird seems to be a continuation of the larger, carrying its form and voice forward like an echo.

I know the ornithologists, with their hair-splittings, or rather feather-splittings, point out many differences, but they are unimportant. The fractions may not agree, but the whole numbers are the same.

I know the bird watchers, with their nitpicking about details, or rather feather-picking, point out many differences, but they don’t really matter. The small details may not match up, but the big picture is the same.

VII
A BED OF BOUGHS

When Aaron came again to camp and tramp with me, or, as he wrote, “to eat locusts and wild honey with me in the wilderness,” It was past the middle of August, and the festival of the season neared its close. We were belated guests, but perhaps all the more eager on that account, especially as the country was suffering from a terrible drought, and the only promise of anything fresh or tonic or cool was in primitive woods and mountain passes.

When Aaron came back to camp and hang out with me, or, as he put it, “to eat locusts and wild honey with me in the wilderness,” it was after mid-August, and the festival of the season was coming to an end. We were late arrivals, but maybe that made us even more excited, especially since the area was dealing with a severe drought, and the only hope for anything fresh, refreshing, or cool was found in the wild forests and mountain trails.

“Now, my friend,” said I, “we can go to Canada, or to the Maine woods, or to the Adirondacks, and thus have a whole loaf and a big loaf of this bread which you know as well as I will have heavy streaks in it, and will not be uniformly sweet; or we can seek nearer woods, and content ourselves with one week instead of four, with the prospect of a keen relish to the last. Four sylvan weeks sound well, but the poetry is mainly confined to the first one. We can take another slice or two of the Catskills, can we not, without being sated with kills and dividing ridges?”

“Now, my friend,” I said, “we can go to Canada, or to the Maine woods, or to the Adirondacks, and enjoy a whole loaf and a big loaf of this bread that you know as well as I do will have thick streaks in it and won’t be evenly sweet; or we can choose closer woods and settle for one week instead of four, with the promise of a thrilling experience to the end. Four weeks in nature sounds great, but the excitement is mostly in the first one. We can take another slice or two of the Catskills, can’t we, without getting tired of the hills and dividing ridges?”

“Anywhere,” replied Aaron, “so that we have a good tramp and plenty of primitive woods. No doubt we should find good browsing on Peakamoose, and trout enough in the streams at its base.”

“Anywhere,” replied Aaron, “as long as we can go for a good hike and have lots of untouched woods. I’m sure we’ll find plenty of good grazing on Peakamoose, and enough trout in the streams at its base.”

So without further ado we made ready, and in due time found ourselves, with our packs on our backs, entering upon a pass in the mountains that led to the valley of the Rondout.

So, without wasting any time, we got ready, and before long we found ourselves, with our backpacks on, heading into a mountain pass that led to the Rondout Valley.

The scenery was wild and desolate in the extreme, the mountains on either hand looking as if they had been swept by a tornado of stone. Stone avalanches hung suspended on their sides, or had shot down into the chasm below. It was a kind of Alpine scenery, where crushed and broken boulders covered the earth instead of snow.

The landscape was extremely wild and barren, with mountains on either side that looked like they had been hit by a whirlwind of rock. Rockslides clung to the slopes or had tumbled down into the valley below. It resembled Alpine scenery, where shattered and broken boulders covered the ground instead of snow.

In the depressions in the mountains the rocky fragments seemed to have accumulated, and to have formed what might be called stone glaciers that were creeping slowly down.

In the valleys of the mountains, the rocky pieces looked like they had piled up, creating what could be described as stone glaciers slowly making their way down.

Two hours’ march brought us into heavy timber where the stone cataclysm had not reached, and before long the soft voice of the Rondout was heard in the gulf below us. We paused at a spring run, and I followed it a few yards down its mountain stairway, carpeted with black moss, and had my first glimpse of the unknown stream. I stood upon rocks and looked many feet down into a still, sunlit pool and saw the trout disporting themselves in the transparent water, and I was ready to encamp at once; but my companion, who had not been tempted by the view, insisted upon holding to our original purpose, which was to go farther up the stream. We passed a clearing with three or four houses and a saw-mill. The dam of the latter was filled with such clear water that it seemed very shallow, and not ten or twelve feet deep, as it really was. The fish were as conspicuous as if they had been in a pail.

Two hours of walking took us into dense forest where the stone disaster hadn’t reached, and soon we could hear the gentle sound of the Rondout River in the valley below. We stopped at a spring, and I followed it a few yards down its rocky path, covered in black moss, and caught my first sight of the unknown stream. I stood on some rocks and looked down many feet into a calm, sunlit pool, where I saw trout swimming around in the clear water, and I was ready to set up camp right there; but my companion, who wasn’t swayed by the view, insisted we stick to our original plan of going further up the stream. We passed a clearing with three or four houses and a sawmill. The dam at the mill held such clear water that it looked very shallow, not the ten or twelve feet deep it actually was. The fish were as visible as if they were in a bucket.

Two miles farther up we suited ourselves and went into camp.

Two miles further up, we got ourselves ready and set up camp.

If there ever was a stream cradled in the rocks, detained lovingly by them, held and fondled in a rocky lap or tossed in rocky arms, that stream is the Rondout. Its course for several miles from its head is over the stratified rock, and into this it has worn a channel that presents most striking and peculiar features. Now it comes silently along on the top of the rock, spread out and flowing over that thick, dark green moss that is found only in the coldest streams; then drawn into a narrow canal only four or five feet wide, through which it shoots, black and rigid, to be presently caught in a deep basin with shelving, overhanging rocks, beneath which the phƓbe-bird builds in security, and upon which the fisherman stands and casts his twenty or thirty feet of line without fear of being thwarted by the brush; then into a black, well-like pool, ten or fifteen feet deep, with a smooth, circular wall of rock on one side worn by the water through long ages; or else into a deep, oblong pocket, into which and out of which the water glides without a ripple.

If there was ever a stream nestled in the rocks, lovingly held and cradled by them, it’s the Rondout. For several miles from its source, it flows over the layered rock, which it has carved out into a channel with striking and unique features. At times, it glides silently over the top of the rock, spreading out and flowing over the thick, dark green moss that only grows in the coldest streams; then it narrows into a channel just four or five feet wide, shooting through like a black ribbon, only to be caught in a deep basin with sloping, overhanging rocks, where the phƓbe-bird builds its nest safely, and where the fisherman stands casting his twenty or thirty feet of line without worrying about getting snagged in the brush; then it flows into a dark, pool-like well, ten or fifteen feet deep, with a smooth, circular rock wall on one side, worn away by the water over countless years; or sometimes into a deep, elongated pocket where the water moves in and out effortlessly without creating a ripple.

The surface rock is a coarse sandstone superincumbent upon a lighter-colored conglomerate that looks like Shawangunk grits, and when this latter is reached by the water it seems to be rapidly disintegrated by it, thus forming the deep excavations alluded to.

The surface rock is a rough sandstone sitting on top of a lighter-colored conglomerate that resembles Shawangunk grits. When the water reaches this layer, it quickly breaks it down, creating the deep hollows mentioned.

My eyes had never before beheld such beauty in a mountain stream. The water was almost as transparent as the air,—was, indeed, like liquid air; and as it lay in these wells and pits enveloped in shadow, or lit up by a chance ray of the vertical sun, it was a perpetual feast to the eye,—so cool, so deep, so pure; every reach and pool like a vast spring. You lay down and drank or dipped the water up in your cup, and found it just the right degree of refreshing coldness. One is never prepared for the clearness of the water in these streams. It is always a surprise. See them every year for a dozen years, and yet, when you first come upon one, you will utter an exclamation. I saw nothing like it in the Adirondacks, nor in Canada. Absolutely without stain or hint of impurity, it seems to magnify like a lens, so that the bed of the stream and the fish in it appear deceptively near. It is rare to find even a trout stream that is not a little “off color,” as they say of diamonds, but the waters in the section of which I am writing have the genuine ray; it is the undimmed and untarnished diamond.

My eyes had never seen such beauty in a mountain stream before. The water was almost as clear as the air—like liquid air; and as it settled in these wells and pits, either shrouded in shadow or illuminated by a stray ray from the vertical sun, it was a constant delight to the eye—so cool, so deep, so pure; every stretch and pool was like a vast spring. You could lie down and drink from it or scoop it up in your cup, and it felt just the right level of refreshing cold. You’re never really ready for how clear the water is in these streams. It’s always surprising. You can see them every year for a dozen years, yet when you first come across one, you can’t help but exclaim. I saw nothing like it in the Adirondacks or Canada. Absolutely free of any stain or hint of impurity, it seems to magnify like a lens, making the bottom of the stream and the fish in it look deceptively close. It’s rare to find even a trout stream that isn’t a little “off color,” as they describe diamonds, but the waters in the area I’m talking about have the genuine sparkle; it’s like the undimmed and untarnished diamond.

If I were a trout, I should ascend every stream till I found the Rondout. It is the ideal brook. What homes these fish have, what retreats under the rocks, what paved or flagged courts and areas, what crystal depths where no net or snare can reach them!—no mud, no sediment, but here and there in the clefts and seams of the rock patches of white gravel,—spawning-beds ready-made.

If I were a trout, I would swim up every stream until I reached the Rondout. It’s the perfect brook. Look at the homes these fish have, the hideouts under the rocks, the paved or flagged areas, the clear depths where no net or trap can catch them!—no mud, no silt, just here and there in the cracks and crevices of the rocks patches of white gravel,—ready-made spawning beds.

The finishing touch is given by the moss with which the rock is everywhere carpeted. Even in the narrow grooves or channels where the water runs the swiftest, the green lining is unbroken. It sweeps down under the stream and up again on the other side, like some firmly woven texture. It softens every outline and cushions every stone. At a certain depth in the great basins and wells it of course ceases, and only the smooth-swept flagging of the place-rock is visible.

The final detail is the moss that carpets the rock everywhere. Even in the narrow grooves or channels where the water flows the fastest, the green covering remains intact. It flows down under the stream and back up on the other side, like a tightly woven fabric. It softens every edge and cushions every stone. At a certain depth in the large basins and wells, it naturally stops, and only the smoothly worn flagstones of the bedrock are visible.

The trees are kept well back from the margin of the stream by the want of soil, and the large ones unite their branches far above it, thus forming a high winding gallery, along which the fisherman passes and makes his long casts with scarcely an interruption from branch or twig. In a few places he makes no cast, but sees from his rocky perch the water twenty feet below him, and drops his hook into it as into a well.

The trees are kept away from the edge of the stream because there's not enough soil, and the large ones stretch their branches high above it, creating a long, winding gallery for the fisherman to walk through and make his long casts without much interference from branches or twigs. In a few spots, he doesn't cast but looks down from his rocky spot to the water twenty feet below and drops his hook in as if it were a well.

We made camp at a bend in the creek where there was a large surface of mossy rock uncovered by the shrunken stream,—a clean, free space left for us in the wilderness that was faultless as a kitchen and dining-room, and a marvel of beauty as a lounging-room, or an open court, or what you will. An obsolete wood or bark road conducted us to it, and disappeared up the hill in the woods beyond. A loose boulder lay in the middle, and on the edge next the stream were three or four large natural wash-basins scooped out of the rock, and ever filled ready for use. Our lair we carved out of the thick brush under a large birch on the bank. Here we planted our flag of smoke and feathered our nest with balsam and hemlock boughs and ferns, and laughed at your four walls and pillows of down.

We set up camp at a bend in the creek where a large patch of mossy rock was exposed by the shrinking stream—an open, perfect space for us in the wilderness that served as an ideal kitchen and dining area, and was beautifully relaxing as a lounge or an open courtyard, or whatever you want to call it. An old wood or bark trail led us to it and faded into the woods up the hill. A loose boulder sat in the center, and along the edge next to the stream were three or four large natural wash-basins carved out of the rock, always filled and ready to use. We made our camp in the thick brush under a large birch tree on the bank. Here, we raised our flag of smoke and decorated our nest with balsam, hemlock branches, and ferns, laughing at your four walls and down pillows.

yellow birches

Wherever one encamps in the woods, there is home, and every object and feature about the place take on a new interest and assume a near and friendly relation to one. We were at the head of the best fishing. There was an old bark-clearing not far off which afforded us a daily dessert of most delicious blackberries,—an important item in the woods,—and then all the features of the place—a sort of cave above ground—were of the right kind.

Wherever you set up camp in the woods, it feels like home, and everything around you becomes more interesting and feels friendly. We were right by the best fishing spot. There was an old cleared area nearby that provided us with a daily treat of the most delicious blackberries—an important find in the woods—and all the features of the place—a kind of above-ground cave—were just right.

There was not a mosquito, or gnat, or other pest in the woods, the cool nights having already cut them off. The trout were sufficiently abundant, and afforded us a few hours’ sport daily to supply our wants. The only drawback was, that they were out of season, and only palatable to a woodman’s keen appetite. What is this about trout spawning in October and November, and in some cases not till March? These trout had all spawned in August, every one of them. The coldness and purity of the water evidently made them that much earlier. The game laws of the State protect the fish after September 1, proceeding upon the theory that its spawning season is later than that,—as it is in many cases, but not in all, as we found out.

There were no mosquitoes, gnats, or other pests in the woods; the cool nights had already driven them away. The trout were plentiful enough to give us a few hours of sport each day to meet our needs. The only downside was that they were out of season and only tasty to a woodworker's sharp appetite. What’s this about trout spawning in October and November, and in some cases not until March? These trout had all spawned in August, every single one of them. The cold and clean water clearly made them spawn earlier. The state's game laws protect the fish after September 1, based on the belief that their spawning season is later than that — which it is in many cases, but not in all, as we discovered.

The fish are small in these streams, seldom weighing over a few ounces. Occasionally a large one is seen of a pound or pound and a half weight. I remember one such, as black as night, that ran under a black rock. But I remember much more distinctly a still larger one that I caught and lost one eventful day.

The fish in these streams are small, usually weighing only a few ounces. Every now and then, you might spot a bigger one that weighs around a pound or a pound and a half. I recall seeing one that was as black as night, swimming under a dark rock. However, I remember even more clearly a much bigger one that I caught and then lost one memorable day.

I had him on my hook ten minutes, and actually got my thumb in his mouth, and yet he escaped.

I had him on my line for ten minutes, and I even got my thumb in his mouth, but he still got away.

It was only the over-eagerness of the sportsman. I imagined I could hold him by the teeth.

It was just the sportsman's excessive enthusiasm. I thought I could grab him by the teeth.

The place where I struck him was a deep well-hole, and I was perched upon a log that spanned it ten or twelve feet above the water. The situation was all the more interesting because I saw no possible way to land my fish. I could not lead him ashore, and my frail tackle could not be trusted to lift him sheer from that pit to my precarious perch. What should I do? call for help? but no help was near. I had a revolver in my pocket and might have shot him through and through, but that novel proceeding did not occur to me until it was too late. I would have taken a Sam Patch leap into the water, and have wrestled with my antagonist in his own element, but I knew the slack, thus sure to occur, would probably free him; so I peered down upon the beautiful creature and enjoyed my triumph as far as it went. He was caught very lightly through his upper jaw, and I expected every struggle and somersault would break the hold. Presently I saw a place in the rocks where I thought it possible, with such an incentive, to get down within reach of the water: by careful manƓuvring I slipped my pole behind me and got hold of the line, which I cut and wound around my finger; then I made my way toward the end of the log and the place in the rocks, leading my fish along much exhausted on the top of the water. By an effort worthy the occasion I got down within reach of the fish, and, as I have already confessed, thrust my thumb into his mouth and pinched his cheek; he made a spring and was free from my hand and the hook at the same time; for a moment he lay panting on the top of the water, then, recovering himself slowly, made his way down through the clear, cruel element beyond all hope of recapture. My blind impulse to follow and try to seize him was very strong, but I kept my hold and peered and peered long after the fish was lost to view, then looked my mortification in the face and laughed a bitter laugh.

The spot where I caught him was a deep well-like hole, and I was sitting on a log that stretched about ten or twelve feet above the water. The situation was even more intriguing because I couldn't figure out how to land my fish. I couldn't pull him to the shore, and my flimsy tackle couldn't be trusted to lift him straight up from that pit to where I was precariously perched. What should I do? Call for help? But there was no one nearby. I had a revolver in my pocket and could have shot him, but that idea didn't come to me until it was too late. I would have jumped into the water and wrestled with him in his own turf, but I knew that the slack would probably set him free. So, I looked down at the beautiful creature and savored my triumph as much as I could. He was lightly hooked through his upper jaw, and I worried that every struggle and flip might break the hold. Soon, I spotted a spot in the rocks where I thought it might be possible, with some effort, to get down close to the water. Carefully, I slipped my pole behind me and grabbed the line, which I cut and wrapped around my finger; then I made my way towards the end of the log and the rocky spot, leading my exhausted fish along on the surface. With a significant effort, I got down within reach of the fish, and as I've already admitted, I shoved my thumb into his mouth and pinched his cheek; he sprang free from my hand and the hook at the same time. For a moment, he lay gasping on the surface, and then, slowly recovering, he swam down through the clear, unforgiving water, out of reach. My instinct to follow and try to catch him was incredibly strong, but I held back and peered long after the fish disappeared from sight, then faced my disappointment and laughed a bitter laugh.

“But, hang it! I had all the fun of catching the fish, and only miss the pleasure of eating him, which at this time would not be great.”

“But, come on! I had all the fun of catching the fish, and I only miss the enjoyment of eating it, which wouldn’t be that great right now.”

“The fun, I take it,” said my soldier, “is in triumphing, and not in being beaten at the last.”

“The fun, I guess,” said my soldier, “comes from winning, not from losing in the end.”

“Well, have it so; but I would not exchange those ten or fifteen minutes with that trout for the tame two hours you have spent in catching that string of thirty. To see a big fish after days of small fry is an event; to have a jump from one is a glimpse of the sportsman’s paradise; and to hook one, and actually have him under your control for ten minutes,—why, that is paradise itself as long as it lasts.”

“Well, that's fine; but I wouldn't trade those ten or fifteen minutes with that trout for the two boring hours you spent catching that string of thirty. Spotting a big fish after days of catching little ones is a big deal; having one jump is a taste of the sportsman's paradise; and to hook one and actually have it under your control for ten minutes—well, that's paradise itself while it lasts.”

One day I went down to the house of a settler a mill below, and engaged the good dame to make us a couple of loaves of bread, and in the evening we went down after them. How elastic and exhilarating the walk was through the cool, transparent shadows! The sun was gilding the mountains, and its yellow light seemed to be reflected through all the woods. At one point we looked through and along a valley of deep shadow upon a broad sweep of mountain quite near and densely clothed with woods, flooded from base to summit by the setting sun. It was a wild, memorable scene. What power and effectiveness in Nature, I thought, and how rarely an artist catches her touch! Looking down upon or squarely into a mountain covered with a heavy growth of birch and maple, and shone upon by the sun, is a sight peculiarly agreeable to me. How closely the swelling umbrageous heads of the trees fit together, and how the eye revels in the flowing and easy uniformity, while the mind feels the ruggedness and terrible power beneath!

One day, I went down to a settler's house a mile away and asked the kind woman to make us a couple of loaves of bread, and in the evening, we went to pick them up. The walk was so refreshing and uplifting through the cool, clear shadows! The sun was shining on the mountains, and its golden light seemed to spill across all the woods. At one point, we looked through a deep shadowed valley at a vast stretch of mountain nearby, thickly covered with trees, illuminated from base to peak by the setting sun. It was a wild, unforgettable scene. I thought about how powerful and effective Nature is, and how rarely an artist captures her essence! Looking down on or straight into a mountain cloaked in a dense cover of birch and maple trees, basking in the sunlight, is a view I find uniquely pleasing. The way the lush, leafy crowns of the trees fit together is so tight, and the eye delights in the flowing, harmonious scenery, while the mind senses the ruggedness and immense strength underneath!

As we came back, the light yet lingered on the top of Slide Mountain.

As we returned, the light still lingered on the top of Slide Mountain.

“‘The last that parleys with the setting sun,’”

“‘The last to talk with the setting sun,’”

said I, quoting Wordsworth.

said I, quoting Wordsworth.

“That line is almost Shakespearean,” said my companion. “It suggests that great hand at least, though it has not the grit and virility of the more primitive bard. What triumph and fresh morning power in Shakespeare’s lines that will occur to us at sunrise to-morrow!—

“That line is almost Shakespearean,” said my companion. “It suggests that great hand at least, though it doesn’t have the grit and masculinity of the more primitive bard. What triumph and fresh morning energy in Shakespeare’s lines that will come to us at sunrise tomorrow!—

“‘And jocund day
Stands tiptoe on the misty mountain tops.”

“‘And cheerful day
Stands poised on the misty mountain peaks.”

Or in this:—

Or in this:—

“‘Full many a glorious morning have I seen
Flatter the mountain tops with sovran eye.’

“‘I’ve seen many glorious mornings
Shine down on the mountain tops with a powerful gaze.’”

There is savage, perennial beauty there, the quality that Wordsworth and nearly all the modern poets lack.”

There is a wild, timeless beauty there, a quality that Wordsworth and almost all contemporary poets miss.

“But Wordsworth is the poet of the mountains,” said I, “and of lonely peaks. True, he does not express the power and aboriginal grace there is in them, nor toy with them and pluck them up by the hair of their heads, as Shakespeare does. There is something in Peakamoose yonder, as we see it from this point, cutting the blue vault with its dark, serrated edge, not in the bard of Grasmere; but he expresses the feeling of loneliness and insignificance that the cultivated man has in the presence of mountains, and the burden of solemn emotion they give rise to. Then there is something much more wild and merciless, much more remote from human interests and ends, in our long, high, wooded ranges than is expressed by the peaks and scarred groups of the lake country of Britain. These mountains we behold and cross are not picturesque,—they are wild and inhuman as the sea. In them you are in a maze, in a weltering world of woods; you can see neither the earth nor the sky, but a confusion of the growth and decay of centuries, and must traverse them by your compass or your science of woodcraft,—a rift through the trees giving one a glimpse of the opposite range or of the valley beneath, and he is more at sea than ever; one does not know his own farm or settlement when framed in these mountain treetops; all look alike unfamiliar.”

“But Wordsworth is the poet of the mountains,” I said, “and of lonely peaks. True, he doesn’t capture the power and primitive beauty in them, nor does he play with them and lift them up by their hair, as Shakespeare does. There’s something about Peakamoose over there, as we see it from here, cutting the blue sky with its dark, jagged edge, that isn’t in the bard of Grasmere; but he conveys the feeling of loneliness and insignificance that a cultured person feels in the presence of mountains, along with the weight of solemn emotions they provoke. Moreover, there’s something far wilder and harsher, much more disconnected from human concerns, in our long, high, wooded ranges than what the peaks and rugged groups of Britain’s Lake District express. These mountains we see and traverse are not picturesque—they’re wild and inhuman like the sea. In them, you’re in a maze, in a chaotic world of woods; you can see neither the ground nor the sky, just a confusion of growth and decay from centuries, and you have to navigate through them by your compass or your woodsman skills—a gap through the trees gives you a glimpse of the opposite range or the valley below, and you feel more lost than ever; one doesn’t recognize their own farm or settlement when surrounded by these mountain treetops; everything looks equally unfamiliar.”

Not the least of the charm of camping out is your camp-fire at night. What an artist! What pictures are boldly thrown or faintly outlined upon the canvas of the night! Every object, every attitude of your companion is striking and memorable. You see effects and groups every moment that you would give money to be able to carry away with you in enduring form. How the shadows leap, and skulk, and hover about! Light and darkness are in perpetual tilt and warfare, with first the one unhorsed, then the other. The friendly and cheering fire, what acquaintance we make with it! We had almost forgotten there was such an element, we had so long known only its dark offspring, heat. Now we see the wild beauty uncaged and note its manner and temper. How surely it creates its own draught and sets the currents going, as force and enthusiasm always will! It carves itself a chimney out of the fluid and houseless air. A friend, a ministering angel, in subjection; a fiend, a fury, a monster, ready to devour the world, if ungoverned. By day it burrows in the ashes and sleeps; at night it comes forth and sits upon its throne of rude logs, and rules the camp, a sovereign queen.

Not the least of the charm of camping out is your campfire at night. What an artist! What images are boldly cast or faintly outlined on the canvas of the night! Every object, every pose of your companion is striking and unforgettable. You see scenes and groups every moment that you would pay to be able to take home in lasting form. How the shadows leap, skulk, and hover around! Light and darkness are in a constant struggle, with one being overthrown, then the other. The friendly and warm fire, what a connection we make with it! We had almost forgotten there was such an element, as we had long known only its dark side, heat. Now we see the wild beauty unleashed and observe its character and mood. How surely it generates its own drafts and sets the currents in motion, just like force and enthusiasm always do! It carves itself a chimney out of the fluid and empty air. A friend, a helpful spirit, in control; a fiend, a fury, a monster, ready to consume the world if untamed. By day it hides in the ashes and rests; at night it emerges and sits upon its throne of rough logs, ruling the camp like a sovereign queen.

Near camp stood a tall, ragged yellow birch, its partially cast-off bark hanging in crisp sheets or dense rolls.

Near the camp stood a tall, scraggly yellow birch, its partially shed bark hanging in crisp sheets or thick rolls.

“That tree needs the barber,” we said, “and shall have a call from him to-night.”

“That tree needs a trim,” we said, “and will get a visit from the barber tonight.”

So after dark I touched a match into it, and we saw the flames creep up and wax in fury until the whole tree and its main branches stood wrapped in a sheet of roaring flame. It was a wild and striking spectacle, and must have advertised our camp to every nocturnal creature in the forest.

So after dark, I lit a match and we watched the flames spread and grow wildly until the whole tree and its main branches were engulfed in a sheet of roaring fire. It was a wild and impressive sight, and it must have announced our camp to every nighttime creature in the forest.

What does the camper think about when lounging around the fire at night? Not much,—of the sport of the day, of the big fish he lost and might have saved, of the distant settlement, of to-morrow’s plans. An owl hoots off in the mountain and he thinks of him; if a wolf were to howl or a panther to scream, he would think of him the rest of the night. As it is, things flicker and hover through his mind, and he hardly knows whether it is the past or the present that possesses him. Certain it is, he feels the hush and solitude of the great forest, and, whether he will or not, all his musings are in some way cast upon that huge background of the night. Unless he is an old camper-out, there will be an undercurrent of dread or half fear. My companion said he could not help but feel all the time that there ought to be a sentinel out there pacing up and down. One seems to require less sleep in the woods, as if the ground and the untempered air rested and refreshed him sooner. The balsam and the hemlock heal his aches very quickly. If one is awakened often during the night, as he invariably is, he does not feel that sediment of sleep in his mind next day that he does when the same interruption occurs at home; the boughs have drawn it all out of him.

What does the camper think about when hanging out by the fire at night? Not much—just the day's activities, the big fish he lost and could have caught, the nearby settlement, and plans for tomorrow. An owl hoots in the mountains, and he thinks of it; if a wolf howls or a panther screams, he would dwell on that for the rest of the night. As it is, thoughts flicker and drift through his mind, and he can hardly tell whether he's focused on the past or the present. What’s clear is that he feels the quiet and solitude of the vast forest, and whether he likes it or not, all his thoughts are somehow set against that enormous backdrop of night. Unless he’s an experienced camper, there’s usually a feeling of unease or half-concern. My companion mentioned that he couldn’t shake the feeling that there should be a guard out there pacing around. You seem to need less sleep in the woods, as if the ground and the fresh air rejuvenate him faster. The balsam and the hemlock quickly soothe his aches. If he wakes up frequently during the night, as he always does, he doesn’t feel that groggy heaviness in his mind the next day like he does when the same thing happens at home; the branches seem to have drawn all of that out of him.

And it is wonderful how rarely any of the housed and tender white man’s colds or influenzas come through these open doors and windows of the woods. It is our partial isolation from Nature that is dangerous; throw yourself unreservedly upon her and she rarely betrays you.

And it's amazing how rarely the colds or flus that affect the sheltered white man come through these open doors and windows of the woods. It's our partial separation from Nature that's risky; fully embrace her, and she usually doesn't let you down.

If one takes anything to the woods to read, he seldom reads it; it does not taste good with such primitive air.

If someone takes something to read in the woods, they rarely actually read it; it doesn't feel right in such a natural setting.

There are very few camp poems that I know of, poems that would be at home with one on such an expedition; there is plenty that is weird and spectral, as in Poe, but little that is woody and wild as this scene is. I recall a Canadian poem by the late C. D. Shanly—the only one, I believe, the author ever wrote—that fits well the distended pupil of the mind’s eye about the camp-fire at night. It was printed many years ago in the “Atlantic Monthly,” and is called “The Walker of the Snow;” it begins thus:—

There are very few camp poems that I know of, poems that would fit right in during such an expedition; there’s a lot that’s strange and ghostly, like in Poe, but not much that captures the earthy and untamed vibe of this scene. I remember a Canadian poem by the late C. D. Shanly—the only one I think the author ever wrote—that resonates well with the expanded vision of our minds around the campfire at night. It was published many years ago in the “Atlantic Monthly,” and it’s called “The Walker of the Snow;” it starts like this:—

“‘Speed on, speed on, good master;
    The camp lies far away;
We must cross the haunted valley
    Before the close of day.’”

“‘Hurry up, hurry up, good master;
    The camp is really far away;
We need to get through the haunted valley
    Before the day ends.’”

“That has a Canadian sound,” said Aaron; “give us more of it.”

“That sounds Canadian,” Aaron said. “Give us more of it.”

“‘How the snow-blight came upon me
    I will tell you as we go,—
The blight of the shadow hunter
    Who walks the midnight snow.’

“‘How the snow-blight came upon me
    I'll tell you as we go,—
The blight of the shadow hunter
    Who walks the midnight snow.’”

And so on. The intent seems to be to personify the fearful cold that overtakes and benumbs the traveler in the great Canadian forests in winter. This stanza brings out the silence or desolation of the scene very effectively,—a scene without sound or motion:—

And so on. The aim appears to be to give a personality to the chilling cold that overwhelms and numbs the traveler in the vast Canadian forests during winter. This stanza captures the silence or emptiness of the scene very effectively—a scene devoid of sound or movement:—

“‘Save the wailing of the moose-bird
    With a plaintive note and low;
And the skating of the red leaf
    Upon the frozen snow.’

“‘Save the crying of the moose-bird
    With a sorrowful tone and soft;
And the gliding of the red leaf
    On the frozen snow.’”

“The rest of the poem runs thus:—

“The rest of the poem goes like this:—

“‘And said I, Though dark is falling,
    And far the camp must be,
Yet my heart it would be lightsome
    If I had but company.

“‘And then I sang and shouted,
    Keeping measure as I sped,
To the harp-twang of the snow-shoe
    As it sprang beneath my tread.

“‘Nor far into the valley
    Had I dipped upon my way,
When a dusky figure joined me
    In a capuchin of gray,

“‘Bending upon the snow-shoes
    With a long and limber stride;
And I hailed the dusky stranger,
    As we traveled side by side.

“‘But no token of communion
    Gave he by word or look,
And the fear-chill fell upon me
    At the crossing of the brook.

“‘For I saw by the sickly moonlight,
     As I followed, bending low,
That the walking of the stranger
    Left no foot-marks on the snow.

“‘Then the fear-chill gathered o’er me,
    Like a shroud around me cast,
As I sank upon the snow-drift
    Where the shadow hunter passed.

“‘And the otter-trappers found me,
    Before the break of day,
With my dark hair blanched and whitened
    As the snow in which I lay.

“‘But they spoke not as they raised me;
    For they knew that in the night
I had seen the shadow hunter
    And had withered in his sight.

“‘Sancta Maria speed us!
    The sun is fallen low:
Before us lies the valley
    Of the Walker of the Snow!’”

“‘And I said, even though it's getting dark,
    And the camp is far away,
My heart would still feel light
    If only I had some company.

“‘So I sang and shouted,
    Keeping time as I moved,
To the rhythm of the snowshoes
    As they crunched beneath my feet.

“‘I hadn’t gone far into the valley
    When a dark figure joined me
    Wearing a gray hooded cloak,

“‘Walking on snowshoes
    With a long and easy stride;
I greeted the dark stranger,
    As we walked side by side.

“‘But he showed no sign of acknowledgment
    By word or look,
And a chill of fear fell over me
    As we crossed the brook.

“‘For I saw in the dim moonlight,
     As I followed, bending low,
That the stranger’s footsteps
    Left no marks upon the snow.

“‘Then fear wrapped around me,
    Like a shroud cast over me,
As I sank into the snowbank
    Where the shadowy hunter passed.

“‘And the otter trappers found me,
    Before dawn broke,
With my dark hair turned white
    Like the snow in which I lay.

“‘But they didn’t say anything as they lifted me;
    For they knew that in the night
I had seen the shadowy hunter
    And had withered in his sight.

“‘Sancta Maria, help us!
    The sun is low:
Ahead lies the valley
    Of the Walker of the Snow!’”

“Ah!” exclaimed my companion. “Let us pile on more of those dry birch-logs; I feel both the ‘fear-chill’ and the ‘cold-chill’ creeping over me. How far is it to the valley of the Neversink?”

“Ah!” my companion exclaimed. “Let’s throw on some more of those dry birch logs; I can feel both the ‘fear-chill’ and the ‘cold-chill’ creeping over me. How far is it to the Neversink Valley?”

“About three or four hours’ march, the man said.”

“About three or four hours of walking, the man said.”

“I hope we have no haunted valleys to cross?”

“I hope we don’t have to cross any haunted valleys?”

“None,” said I, “but we pass an old log cabin about which there hangs a ghostly superstition. At a certain hour in the night, during the time the bark is loose on the hemlock, a female form is said to steal from it and grope its way into the wilderness. The tradition runs that her lover, who was a bark-peeler and wielded the spud, was killed by his rival, who felled a tree upon him while they were at work. The girl, who helped her mother cook for the ‘hands,’ was crazed by the shock, and that night stole forth into the woods and was never seen or heard of more. There are old hunters who aver that her cry may still be heard at night at the head of the valley whenever a tree falls in the stillness of the forest.”

“None,” I replied, “but we pass an old log cabin that has a spooky legend around it. At a certain hour in the night, when the bark is loose on the hemlock, a woman is said to emerge and wander into the wilderness. The story goes that her lover, who was a bark-peeler and used a spud, was killed by his rival when a tree fell on him while they were working. The girl, who helped her mother cook for the workers, went mad from the shock and that night ventured into the woods and was never seen or heard from again. There are old hunters who claim that her cry can still be heard at night at the head of the valley whenever a tree falls in the quiet of the forest.”

“Well, I heard a tree fall not ten minutes ago,” said Aaron; “a distant, rushing sound with a subdued crash at the end of it, and the only answering cry I heard was the shrill voice of the screech owl off yonder against the mountain. But maybe it was not an owl,” said he after a moment; “let us help the legend along by believing it was the voice of the lost maiden.”

“Well, I heard a tree fall less than ten minutes ago,” said Aaron; “a faint, rushing sound followed by a soft crash at the end, and the only response I heard was the piercing call of the screech owl over there by the mountain. But maybe it wasn’t an owl,” he added after a moment; “let’s add to the story by believing it was the voice of the lost maiden.”

“By the way,” continued he, “do you remember the pretty creature we saw seven years ago in the shanty on the West Branch, who was really helping her mother cook for the hands, a slip of a girl twelve or thirteen years old, with eyes as beautiful and bewitching as the waters that flowed by her cabin? I was wrapped in admiration till she spoke; then how the spell was broken! Such a voice! It was like the sound of pots and pans when you expected to hear a lute.”

“By the way,” he went on, “do you remember the pretty girl we saw seven years ago in the little cabin on the West Branch, who was genuinely helping her mom cook for the workers? She was just a slip of a girl, around twelve or thirteen, with eyes as beautiful and enchanting as the water flowing by her cabin. I was completely in awe until she spoke; then the magic was gone! What a voice! It was like the clattering of pots and pans when you expected to hear a stringed instrument.”

The next day we bade farewell to the Rondout, and set out to cross the mountain to the east branch of the Neversink.

The next day we said goodbye to the Rondout and set out to cross the mountain to the east branch of the Neversink.

“We shall find tame waters compared with these, I fear,—a shriveled stream brawling along over loose stones, with few pools or deep places.”

“We will find calm waters compared to these, I’m afraid—a thin stream bubbling over loose stones, with few pools or deep spots.”

Our course was along the trail of the bark-men who had pursued the doomed hemlock to the last tree at the head of the valley. As we passed along, a red steer stepped out of the bushes into the road ahead of us, where the sunshine fell full upon him, and, with a half-scared, beautiful look, begged alms of salt. We passed the Haunted Shanty; but both it and the legend about it looked very tame at ten o’clock in the morning. After the road had faded out, we took to the bed of the stream to avoid the gauntlet of the underbrush, skipping up the mountain from boulder to boulder. Up and up we went, with frequent pauses and copious quaffing of the cold water. My soldier declared a “haunted valley” would be a godsend; anything but endless dragging of one’s self up such an Alpine stairway. The winter wren, common all through the woods, peeped and scolded at us as we sat blowing near the summit, and the oven-bird, not quite sure as to what manner of creatures we were, hopped down a limb to within a few feet of us and had a good look, then darted off into the woods to tell the news. I also noted the Canada warbler, the chestnut-sided warbler, and the black-throated blue-back,—the latter most abundant of all. Up these mountain brooks, too, goes the belted kingfisher, swooping around through the woods when he spies the fisherman, then wheeling into the open space of the stream and literally making a “blue streak” down under the branches.

Our route followed the path of the loggers who had chased the doomed hemlock to the very last tree at the head of the valley. As we continued, a red steer stepped out of the bushes onto the road in front of us, where the sunlight shone brightly on him, and, with a half-scared, beautiful look, begged for some salt. We passed the Haunted Shanty; but both it and the legend surrounding it seemed quite unexciting at ten o’clock in the morning. Once the road disappeared, we took to the streambed to avoid the thick brush, hopping from boulder to boulder as we climbed the mountain. Up and up we went, with frequent stops and plenty of cold water. My companion declared a “haunted valley” would be a blessing; anything was better than the endless struggle of climbing such a steep path. The winter wren, common throughout the woods, chirped and scolded at us while we rested near the summit, and the oven-bird, unsure of what we were, hopped down a branch to within a few feet of us, had a good look, then darted off into the woods to spread the news. I also spotted the Canada warbler, the chestnut-sided warbler, and the black-throated blue-back—the latter being the most common of all. Up these mountain streams, the belted kingfisher also flies, swooping through the woods when he spots a fisherman, then darting into the open space of the stream and creating a literal “blue streak” under the branches.

At last the stream which had been our guide was lost under the rocks, and before long the top was gained. These mountains are horse-shaped. There is always a broad, smooth back, more or less depressed, which the hunter aims to bestride; rising rapidly from this is pretty sure to be a rough, curving ridge that carries the forest up to some highest peak. We were lucky in hitting the saddle, but we could see a little to the south the sharp, steep neck of the steed sweeping up toward the sky with an erect mane of balsam fir.

At last, the stream that had guided us disappeared under the rocks, and soon we reached the top. These mountains are shaped like horses. There’s always a wide, flat back, usually a bit sunken, that the hunter aims to ride. Rising steeply from this is often a rough, curved ridge that leads the forest up to the highest peak. We were fortunate to find the saddle, but to the south, we could see the sharp, steep neck of the horse rising up toward the sky, topped with a standing mane of balsam fir.

These mountains are steed-like in other respects: any timid and vacillating course with them is sure to get you into trouble. One must strike out boldly, and not be disturbed by the curveting and shying; the valley you want lies squarely behind them, but farther off than you think, and if you do not go for it resolutely, you will get bewildered and the mountain will play you a trick.

These mountains are like horses in other ways: any hesitant and indecisive approach will definitely lead you into trouble. You have to charge ahead confidently and not let their jumping around and shying away throw you off; the valley you’re aiming for is directly behind them, but it’s further away than you might expect, and if you don’t go for it decisively, you’ll end up confused, and the mountain will outsmart you.

I may say that Aaron and I kept a tight rein and a good pace till we struck a water-course on the other side, and that we clattered down it with no want of decision till it emptied into a larger stream which we knew must be the East Branch. An abandoned fishpole lay on the stones, marking the farthest point reached by some fisherman. According to our reckoning, we were five or six miles above the settlement, with a good depth of primitive woods all about us.

I can say that Aaron and I kept a tight grip and a steady pace until we hit a watercourse on the other side, and we moved down it with plenty of determination until it flowed into a larger stream that we knew had to be the East Branch. An old fishing pole was lying on the stones, marking the farthest point reached by some fisherman. By our estimate, we were about five or six miles above the settlement, surrounded by a good depth of untouched woods.

We kept on down the stream, now and then pausing at a likely place to take some trout for dinner, and with an eye out for a good camping-ground. Many of the trout were full of ripe spawn, and a few had spawned, the season with them being a little later than on the stream we had left, perhaps because the water was less cold. Neither had the creek here any such eventful and startling career. It led, indeed, quite a humdrum sort of life under the roots and fallen treetops and among the loose stones. At rare intervals it beamed upon us from some still reach or dark cover, and won from us our best attention in return.

We continued down the stream, occasionally stopping at promising spots to catch some trout for dinner, while also looking for a good camping site. Many of the trout were full of ripe eggs, and a few had already spawned; their season was a bit later than the stream we had just left, maybe because the water was warmer. The creek here didn’t have any particularly exciting or surprising moments. It led a pretty ordinary life beneath the roots and fallen tree trunks and among the loose stones. Every once in a while, it would shine upon us from a calm stretch or dark cover, and that made us pay close attention in return.

The day was quite spent before we had pitched our air-woven tent and prepared our dinner, and we gathered boughs for our bed in the gloaming. Breakfast had to be caught in the morning and was not served early, so that it was nine o’clock before we were in motion. A little bird, the red-eyed vireo, warbled most cheerily in the trees above our camp, and, as Aaron said, “gave us a good send-off.” We kept down the stream, following the inevitable bark road.

The day was almost over by the time we set up our lightweight tent and made dinner, and we collected branches for our bed as the sun was going down. Breakfast had to be caught in the morning and wasn't served early, so it was nine o’clock before we got moving. A little bird, the red-eyed vireo, chirped happily in the trees above our camp, and, as Aaron said, “gave us a good send-off.” We followed the stream, keeping to the usual bark road.

My companion had refused to look at another “dividing ridge” that had neither path nor way, and henceforth I must keep to the open road or travel alone. Two hours’ tramp brought us to an old clearing with some rude, tumble-down log buildings that many years before had been occupied by the bark and lumber men. The prospect for trout was so good in the stream hereabouts, and the scene so peaceful and inviting, shone upon by the dreamy August sun, that we concluded to tarry here until the next day. It was a page of pioneer history opened to quite unexpectedly. A dim footpath led us a few yards to a superb spring, in which a trout from the near creek had taken up his abode. We took possession of what had been a shingle-shop, attracted by its huge fireplace. We floored it with balsam boughs, hung its walls with our “traps,” and sent the smoke curling again from its disused chimney.

My friend refused to look at another “dividing ridge” that had no path or way, so from then on, I had to stick to the open road or go alone. After two hours of hiking, we arrived at an old clearing with some rough, falling-apart log buildings that had been home to the bark and lumber workers many years ago. The trout fishing looked so promising in the nearby stream, and the scene was so peaceful and inviting, bathed in the dreamy August sun, that we decided to stay here until the next day. It felt like we had stumbled upon a page of pioneer history. A faint footpath led us a few yards to a stunning spring, where a trout from the nearby creek had made its home. We took over what had once been a shingle shop, drawn in by its massive fireplace. We lined the floor with balsam boughs, decorated the walls with our gear, and got the smoke curling out of its unused chimney once more.

The most musical and startling sound we heard in the woods greeted our ears that evening about sundown as we sat on a log in front of our quarters,—the sound of slow, measured pounding in the valley below us. We did not know how near we were to human habitations, and the report of the lumberman’s mallet, like the hammering of a great woodpecker, was music to the ear and news to the mind. The air was still and dense, and the silence such as alone broods over these little openings in the primitive woods. My soldier started as if he had heard a signal-gun. The sound, coming so far through the forest, sweeping over those great wind-harps of trees, became wild and legendary, though probably made by a lumberman driving a wedge or working about his mill.

The most musical and surprising sound we heard in the woods greeted us that evening around sunset as we sat on a log in front of our quarters—the sound of slow, steady pounding in the valley below. We didn't realize how close we were to human settlements, and the sound of the lumberman's mallet, like the hammering of a giant woodpecker, was music to our ears and news to our minds. The air was still and thick, with a silence that only exists in these little clearings within the untouched woods. My soldier jumped as if he had heard a signal gun. The sound, traveling so far through the forest, sweeping over those massive trees, felt wild and legendary, though it was probably just a lumberman driving a wedge or working around his mill.

We expected a friendly visit from porcupines that night, as we saw where they had freshly gnawed all about us; hence, when a red squirrel came and looked in upon us very early in the morning and awoke us by his snickering and giggling, my comrade cried out, “There is your porcupig.” How the frisking red rogue seemed to enjoy what he had found! He looked in at the door and snickered, then in at the window, then peeked down from between the rafters and cachinnated till his sides must have ached; then struck an attitude upon the chimney, and fairly squealed with mirth and ridicule. In fact, he grew so obstreperous, and so disturbed our repose, that we had to “shoo” him away with one of our boots. He declared most plainly that he had never before seen so preposterous a figure as we cut lying there in the corner of that old shanty.

We were expecting a friendly visit from porcupines that night since we noticed where they had just been gnawing around us. So, when a red squirrel dropped by and woke us up early in the morning with his snickering and giggling, my friend shouted, “There’s your porcupig.” The mischievous red little guy seemed to really enjoy what he saw! He peeked in through the door and snickered, then at the window, and even popped down from between the rafters, laughing so hard he must have been in pain. Then he posed on the chimney, practically squealing with laughter and mockery. Honestly, he got so loud and disrupted our peace that we had to “shoo” him away with one of our boots. It was clear he had never seen such a ridiculous sight as we made lying there in the corner of that old shack.

The morning boded rain, the week to which we had limited ourselves drew near its close, and we concluded to finish our holiday worthily by a good square tramp to the railroad station, twenty-three miles distant, as it proved. Two miles brought us to stumpy fields, and to the house of the upper inhabitant. They told us there was a short cut across the mountain, but my soldier shook his head.

The morning looked like it was going to rain, and our week-long trip was coming to an end, so we decided to wrap up our vacation by taking a solid hike to the train station, which turned out to be twenty-three miles away. After two miles, we reached some uneven fields and the home of the upper resident. They mentioned a shortcut over the mountain, but my soldier just shook his head.

“Better twenty miles of Europe,” said he, getting Tennyson a little mixed, “than one of Cathay, or Slide Mountain either.”

“Better twenty miles of Europe,” he said, getting Tennyson a bit confused, “than one of Cathay, or Slide Mountain, for that matter.”

Drops of the much-needed rain began to come down, and I hesitated in front of the woodshed.

Drops of much-needed rain started to fall, and I paused in front of the woodshed.

“Sprinkling weather always comes to some bad end,” said Aaron, with a reminiscence of an old couplet in his mind, and so it proved, for it did not get beyond a sprinkle, and the sun shone out before noon.

“Light, scattered rain always leads to trouble,” said Aaron, recalling an old saying in his mind, and that’s exactly what happened, as it barely rained at all, and the sun appeared before noon.

In the next woods I picked up from the middle of the road the tail and one hind leg of one of our native rats, the first I had ever seen except in a museum. An owl or fox had doubtless left it the night before. It was evident the fragments had once formed part of a very elegant and slender creature. The fur that remained (for it was not hair) was tipped with red. My reader doubtless knows that the common rat is an importation, and that there is a native American rat, usually found much farther south than the locality of which I am writing, that lives in the woods,—a sylvan rat, very wild and nocturnal in his habits, and seldom seen even by hunters or woodmen. Its eyes are large and fine, and its form slender. It looks like only a far-off undegenerate cousin of the filthy creature that has come to us from the long-peopled Old World. Some creature ran between my feet and the fire toward morning, the last night we slept in the woods, and I have little doubt it was one of these wood-rats.

In the next woods, I found the tail and one hind leg of one of our native rats in the middle of the road, the first one I had ever seen outside of a museum. An owl or fox must have left it there the night before. It was clear that these pieces used to belong to a very elegant and slender creature. The remaining fur (it wasn't hair) had red tips. My readers probably know that the common rat is an outsider, and that there is a native American rat, usually found much farther south than the area I'm discussing, that lives in the woods—a wild, nocturnal rat that is rarely seen even by hunters or woodworkers. Its eyes are large and beautiful, and its body is slender. It looks like a distant, uncorrupted cousin of the filthy creature that has arrived from the heavily populated Old World. Something ran between my feet and the fire early in the morning on the last night we stayed in the woods, and I'm fairly certain it was one of these wood-rats.

The people in these back settlements are almost as shy and furtive as the animals. Even the men look a little scared when you stop them by your questions. The children dart behind their parents when you look at them. As we sat on a bridge resting,—for our packs still weighed fifteen or twenty pounds each,—two women passed us with pails on their arms, going for blackberries. They filed by with their eyes down like two abashed nuns.

The people in these rural areas are almost as shy and secretive as the animals. Even the men seem a bit nervous when you stop them with your questions. The kids hide behind their parents when you look at them. As we were sitting on a bridge taking a break—our backpacks still weighing about fifteen or twenty pounds each—two women walked by carrying pails, headed out to pick blackberries. They walked past with their eyes down, much like two embarrassed nuns.

In due time we found an old road, to which we had been directed, that led over the mountain to the West Branch. It was a hard pull, sweetened by blackberries and a fine prospect. The snowbird was common along the way, and a solitary wild pigeon shot through the woods in front of us, recalling the nests we had seen on the East Branch,—little scaffoldings of twigs scattered all through the trees.

In due time, we discovered an old road that we had been told about, leading over the mountain to the West Branch. It was a tough climb, made better by blackberries and great views. The snowbird was common along the route, and a lone wild pigeon flew through the woods in front of us, reminding us of the nests we had seen on the East Branch—small structures made of twigs scattered throughout the trees.

It was nearly noon when we struck the West Branch, and the sun was scalding hot. We knew that two and three pound trout had been taken there, and yet we wet not a line in its waters. The scene was primitive, and carried one back to the days of his grandfather, stumpy fields, log fences, log houses and barns. A boy twelve or thirteen years old came out of a house ahead of us eating a piece of bread and butter. We soon overtook him and held converse with him. He knew the land well, and what there was in the woods and the waters. He had walked out to the railroad station, fourteen miles distant, to see the cars, and back the same day. I asked him about the flies and mosquitoes, etc. He said they were all gone except the “blunder-heads;” there were some of them left yet.

It was almost noon when we hit the West Branch, and the sun was blazing hot. We knew that two and three-pound trout had been caught there, yet we didn’t cast a line in its waters. The scene was rustic, reminiscent of the days of our grandfathers, with uneven fields, log fences, log houses, and barns. A boy around twelve or thirteen came out of a house in front of us, munching on a piece of bread and butter. We quickly caught up to him and struck up a conversation. He knew the land well and what was in the woods and waters. He had walked to the railroad station, fourteen miles away, just to see the trains, and back the same day. I asked him about the flies and mosquitoes, and he told me they were mostly gone except for the “blunder-heads;” there were still a few of those around.

“What are blunder-heads?” I inquired, sniffing new game.

“What are blunder-heads?” I asked, sensing a new opportunity.

“The pesky little fly that gets into your eye when you are a-fishing.”

“The annoying little fly that gets into your eye when you're fishing.”

Ah, yes! I knew him well. We had got acquainted some days before, and I thanked the boy for the name. It is an insect that hovers before your eye as you thread the streams, and you are forever vaguely brushing at it under the delusion that it is a little spider suspended from your hat-brim; and just as you want to see clearest, into your eye it goes, head and ears, and is caught between the lids. You miss your cast, but you catch a “blunder-head.”

Ah, yes! I knew him well. We had met a few days earlier, and I thanked the boy for the name. It’s an insect that hovers in front of your face as you navigate the streams, and you’re constantly swatting at it, thinking it’s a little spider hanging from your hat’s brim; and just when you want to see the clearest, it zooms into your eye, headfirst, and gets stuck between your eyelids. You miss your cast, but you catch a “blunder-head.”

We paused under a bridge at the mouth of Biscuit Brook and ate our lunch, and I can recommend it to be as good a wayside inn as the pedestrian need look for. Better bread and milk than we had there I never expect to find. The milk was indeed so good that Aaron went down to the little log house under the hill a mile farther on and asked for more; and being told they had no cow, he lingered five minutes on the doorstone with his sooty pail in his hand, putting idle questions about the way and distance to the mother while he refreshed himself with the sight of a well-dressed and comely-looking young girl, her daughter.

We stopped under a bridge at the entrance of Biscuit Brook and had our lunch, and I can honestly say it was as good a spot for a rest as any traveler could ask for. I've never had better bread and milk than what we enjoyed there. The milk was so delicious that Aaron walked down to the little log house a mile further along and asked for more; when he found out they didn’t have a cow, he hung around for five minutes on the doorstep with his dirty bucket in hand, casually asking questions about the way and distance to the mother while he took in the sight of a well-dressed and attractive young woman, her daughter.

“I got no milk,” said he, hurrying on after me, “but I got something better, only I cannot divide it.”

“I don’t have any milk,” he said, rushing after me, “but I have something better, it’s just that I can’t share it.”

“I know what it is,” replied I; “I heard her voice.”

"I know what it is," I replied; "I heard her voice."

“Yes, and it was a good one, too. The sweetest sound I ever heard,” he went on, “was a girl’s voice after I had been four years in the army, and, by Jove! if I didn’t experience something of the same pleasure in hearing this young girl speak after a week in the woods. She had evidently been out in the world and was home on a visit. It was a different look she gave me from that of the natives. This is better than fishing for trout,” said he. “You drop in at the next house.”

“Yes, and it was a great one, too. The sweetest sound I ever heard,” he continued, “was a girl’s voice after I had spent four years in the army, and, wow! I felt something similar when I heard this young girl speak after a week in the woods. She clearly had experience in the outside world and was back home for a visit. She looked at me differently than the locals did. This is better than fishing for trout,” he said. “You should drop by at the next house.”

But the next house looked too unpromising.

But the next house seemed way too disappointing.

“There is no milk there,” said I, “unless they keep a goat.”

“There’s no milk there,” I said, “unless they have a goat.”

“But could we not,” said my facetious companion, “go it on that?”

“But can’t we,” said my joking friend, “go with that?”

A couple of miles beyond I stopped at a house that enjoyed the distinction of being clapboarded, and had the good fortune to find both the milk and the young lady. A mother and her daughter were again the only occupants save a babe in the cradle, which the young woman quickly took occasion to disclaim.

A couple of miles down the road, I stopped at a house that was made of clapboard and was lucky enough to find both the milk and the young lady. The only people there were a mother and her daughter, except for a baby in the cradle, which the young woman quickly made sure to distance herself from.

“It has not opened its dear eyes before since its mother left. Come to aunty,” and she put out her hands.

“It hasn’t opened its little eyes since its mother left. Come here to your aunt,” and she reached out her hands.

The daughter filled my pail and the mother replenished our stock of bread. They asked me to sit and cool myself, and seemed glad of a stranger to talk with. They had come from an adjoining county five years before, and had carved their little clearing out of the solid woods.

The daughter filled my bucket and the mother restocked our bread. They invited me to sit down and relax, clearly happy to chat with a stranger. They had moved from a neighboring county five years earlier and had created their small clearing in the dense woods.

“The men folks,” the mother said, “came on ahead and built the house right among the big trees,” pointing to the stumps near the door.

“The guys,” the mother said, “came on ahead and built the house right among the big trees,” pointing to the stumps near the door.

One no sooner sets out with his pack upon his back to tramp through the land than all objects and persons by the way have a new and curious interest to him. The tone of his entire being is not a little elevated, and all his perceptions and susceptibilities quickened. I feel that some such statement is necessary to justify the interest that I felt in this backwoods maiden. A slightly pale face it was, strong and well arched, with a tender, wistful expression not easy to forget.

One hardly sets out with his backpack ready to trek through the land before everything and everyone along the way takes on a new and intriguing significance. His whole demeanor lifts, and his senses and feelings become heightened. I think it’s important to mention this to explain why I was so fascinated by this girl from the backwoods. She had a slightly pale face, strong and well-defined, with a gentle, longing look that’s hard to forget.

I had surely seen that face many times before in towns and cities, and in other lands, but I hardly expected to meet it here amid the stumps. What were the agencies that had given it its fine lines and its gracious intelligence amid these simple, primitive scenes? What did my heroine read, or think? or what were her unfulfilled destinies? She wore a sprig of prince’s pine in her hair, which gave a touch peculiarly welcome.

I had definitely seen that face many times before in towns and cities, and in other countries, but I never expected to see it here among the stumps. What had shaped its beautiful features and graceful intelligence among these simple, primitive sights? What did my heroine read or think? What were her unfulfilled dreams? She wore a sprig of prince’s pine in her hair, which added a uniquely pleasant touch.

“Pretty lonely,” she said, in answer to my inquiry; “only an occasional fisherman in summer, and in winter—nobody at all.”

“Pretty lonely,” she said in response to my question; “just a few fishermen in the summer, and in winter—nobody at all.”

And the little new schoolhouse in the woods farther on, with its half-dozen scholars and the girlish face of the teacher seen through the open door,—nothing less than the exhilaration of a journey on foot could have made it seem the interesting object it was. Two of the little girls had been to the spring after a pail of water, and came struggling out of the woods into the road with it as we passed. They set down their pail and regarded us with a half-curious, half-alarmed look.

And the small new schoolhouse deeper in the woods, with its six students and the young teacher's face visible through the open door—nothing short of the excitement of walking could have made it feel as fascinating as it was. Two of the little girls had gone to the spring for a bucket of water and were coming out of the woods onto the road with it as we walked by. They put down their bucket and looked at us with a mix of curiosity and alarm.

“What is your teacher’s name?” asked one of us.

“What’s your teacher’s name?” asked one of us.

“Miss Lucinde Josephine—” began the red-haired one, then hesitated, bewildered, when the bright, dark-eyed one cut her short with “Miss Simms,” and taking hold of the pail said, “Come on.”

“Miss Lucinde Josephine—” started the red-haired one, then paused, confused, when the bright, dark-eyed one interrupted her with “Miss Simms,” and grabbed the pail, saying, “Come on.”

“Are there any scholars from above here?” I inquired.

“Are there any scholars from above here?” I asked.

“Yes, Bobbie and Matie,” and they hastened toward the door.

“Yes, Bobbie and Matie,” and they rushed toward the door.

We once more stopped under a bridge for refreshments, and took our time, knowing the train would not go on without us. By four o’clock we were across the mountain, having passed from the watershed of the Delaware into that of the Hudson. The next eight miles we had a down grade but a rough road, and during the last half of it we had blisters on the bottoms of our feet. It is one of the rewards of the pedestrian that, however tired he may be, he is always more or less refreshed by his journey. His physical tenement has taken an airing. His respiration has been deepened, his circulation quickened. A good draught has carried off the fumes and the vapors. One’s quality is intensified; the color strikes in. At noon that day I was much fatigued; at night I was leg-weary and footsore, but a fresh, hardy feeling had taken possession of me that lasted for weeks.

We stopped under a bridge for a break and took our time, knowing the train wouldn’t leave without us. By four o’clock, we had crossed the mountain, moving from the Delaware watershed to that of the Hudson. For the next eight miles, we had a downhill stretch but the road was rough, and during the last half of it, we got blisters on the bottoms of our feet. One of the perks of walking is that, no matter how tired you are, you always feel at least a little refreshed by the journey. Your body gets some fresh air. Your breathing becomes deeper, and your circulation speeds up. A good draft clears out the toxins and the heat. You feel more alive; the colors seem brighter. At noon that day, I was very tired; by night, my legs were worn out and my feet ached, but I had a fresh, invigorating feeling that stayed with me for weeks.

VIII
BIRDS’-NESTING

Birds’s-nesting is by no means a failure, even though you find no birds’-nests. You are sure to find other things of interest, plenty of them. A friend of mine says that, in his youth, he used to go hunting with his gun loaded for wild turkeys, and, though he frequently saw plenty of smaller game, he generally came home empty-handed, because he was loaded only for turkeys. But the student of ornithology, who is also a lover of Nature in all her shows and forms, does not go out loaded for turkeys merely, but for everything that moves or grows, and is quite sure, therefore, to bag some game, if not with his gun, then with his eye, or his nose, or his ear. Even a crow’s nest is not amiss, or a den in the rocks where the coons or the skunks live, or a log where a partridge drums, or the partridge himself starting up with spread tail, and walking a few yards in advance of you before he goes humming through the woods, or a woodchuck hole, with well beaten and worn entrance, and with the saplings gnawed and soiled about it, or the strong, fetid smell of the fox, which a sharp nose detects here and there, and which is a good perfume in the woods. And then it is enough to come upon a spring in the woods and stoop down and drink of the sweet, cold water, and bathe your hands in it, or to walk along a trout brook, which has absorbed the shadows till it has itself become but a denser shade. Then I am always drawn out of my way by a ledge of rocks, and love nothing better than to explore the caverns and dens, or to sit down under the overhanging crags and let the wild scene absorb me.

Bird-nesting isn’t a failure, even if you don’t find any bird nests. You’re sure to discover plenty of other interesting things. A friend of mine says that when he was younger, he used to go hunting for wild turkeys, and although he often spotted smaller game, he usually came home empty-handed because he only had his gun loaded for turkeys. But a student of ornithology, who loves Nature in all her forms, doesn’t just go out looking for turkeys; he’s ready to appreciate everything that moves or grows, so he’s likely to find something, whether it’s with his gun or through his eyes, ears, or nose. Even finding a crow’s nest or a den in the rocks where raccoons or skunks live is worthwhile. Spotting a log where a partridge drums, or the partridge itself taking off with a spread tail and walking a few yards ahead of you before disappearing into the woods, is also special. You might see a well-worn woodchuck hole, with gnawed saplings around it, or catch the strong, musky scent of a fox lingering here and there, which is a nice reminder of the wild. It’s also enough to stumble upon a spring in the woods, bend down, drink the sweet, cold water, and wash your hands in it, or stroll along a trout brook that has absorbed the shadows until it becomes just a denser shade. I always end up deviating my path for a rocky ledge and enjoy nothing more than exploring the caves and dens, or sitting under the overhanging rocks and letting the wild scene wrap around me.

ledges

There is a fascination about ledges! They are an unmistakable feature, and give emphasis and character to the scene. I feel their spell, and must pause awhile. Time, old as the hills and older, looks out of their scarred and weather-worn face. The woods are of to-day, but the ledges, in comparison, are of eternity. One pokes about them as he would about ruins, and with something of the same feeling. They are ruins of the fore world. Here the foundations of the hills were laid; here the earth-giants wrought and builded. They constrain one to silence and meditation; the whispering and rustling trees seem trivial and impertinent.

There’s something captivating about ledges! They’re a distinctive feature that adds depth and character to the scene. I can feel their pull, and I have to stop for a moment. Time, as ancient as the hills and even older, stares out from their scarred and weathered surface. The woods are from today, but the ledges, in contrast, belong to eternity. People explore them as they would old ruins, feeling something similar. They are remnants of the ancient world. Here, the mountains were formed; here, the earth's giants shaped and built. They inspire silence and reflection; the whispering and rustling trees feel insignificant and intrusive.

And then there are birds’-nests about ledges, too, exquisite mossy tenements, with white, pebbly eggs, that I can never gaze upon without emotion. The little brown bird, the phƓbe, looks at you from her niche till you are within a few feet of her, when she darts away. Occasionally you may find the nest of some rare wood-warbler forming a little pocket in the apron of moss that hangs down over the damp rocks.

And then there are bird nests on ledges, too, beautiful mossy homes, with white, speckled eggs, that I can't look at without feeling something. The little brown bird, the phoebe, watches you from her spot until you're just a few feet away, and then she quickly flies off. Sometimes you might discover the nest of a rare warbler tucked into a small pocket of moss that drapes over the wet rocks.

The sylvan folk seem to know when you are on a peaceful mission, and are less afraid than usual. Did not that marmot to-day guess that my errand did not concern him as he saw me approach from his cover in the bushes? But when he saw me pause and deliberately seat myself on the stone wall immediately over his hole, his confidence was much shaken. He apparently deliberated awhile, for I heard the leaves rustle as if he were making up his mind, when he suddenly broke cover and came for his hole full tilt. Any other animal would have taken to his heels and fled; but a woodchuck’s heels do not amount to much for speed, and he feels his only safety is in his hole. On he came in the most obstinate and determined manner, and I dare say if I had sat down in his hole, would have attacked me unhesitatingly. This I did not give him a chance to do; but, not to be entirely outdone, attempted to set my feet on him in no very gentle manner; but he whipped into his den beneath me with a defiant snort. Farther on, a saucy chipmunk presumed upon my harmless character to an unwonted degree also. I had paused to bathe my hands and face in a little trout brook, and had set a tin cup, which I had partly filled with strawberries as I crossed the field, on a stone at my feet, when along came the chipmunk as confidently as if he knew precisely where he was going, and, perfectly oblivious of my presence, cocked himself up on the rim of the cup and proceeded to eat my choicest berries. I remained motionless and observed him. He had eaten but two when the thought seemed to occur to him that he might be doing better, and he began to fill his pockets. Two, four, six, eight of my berries quickly disappeared, and the cheeks of the little vagabond swelled. But all the time he kept eating, that not a moment might be lost. Then he hopped off the cup, and went skipping from stone to stone till the brook was passed, when he disappeared in the woods. In two or three minutes he was back again, and went to stuffing himself as before; then he disappeared a second time, and I imagined told a friend of his, for in a moment or two along came a bobtailed chipmunk, as if in search of something, and passed up, and down, and around, but did not quite hit the spot. Shortly, the first returned a third time, and had now grown a little fastidious, for he began to sort over my berries, and to bite into them, as if to taste their quality. He was not long in loading up, however, and in making off again. But I had now got tired of the joke, and my berries were appreciably diminishing, so I moved away. What was most curious about the proceeding was, that the little poacher took different directions each time, and returned from different ways. Was this to elude pursuit, or was he distributing the fruit to his friends and neighbors about, astonishing them with strawberries for lunch?

The woodland creatures seem to sense when you're on a peaceful mission and are less afraid than usual. Didn't that marmot today figure out that my purpose had nothing to do with him as he watched me approach from his hiding spot in the bushes? But when he saw me stop and sit down on the stone wall right above his burrow, his confidence took a hit. He seemed to think about it for a bit; I heard the leaves rustling as if he were deciding, and then he suddenly dashed out of hiding and made a beeline for his hole. Any other animal would have run away, but a woodchuck isn’t very fast, and he knows his only safe place is his burrow. He came charging at me stubbornly, and I bet if I had sat down in his hole, he would have charged at me without hesitation. I didn’t let him do that; instead, I tried to put my feet on him in a not-so-gentle way, but he darted into his den beneath me with a defiant snort. Further along, a cheeky chipmunk took advantage of my harmless nature. I had paused to wash my hands and face in a little trout stream, setting a tin cup filled with strawberries on a stone at my feet while I crossed the field. The chipmunk approached confidently, as if he knew exactly where he was going, completely unaware of me. He hopped up on the rim of the cup and started munching on my best berries. I stayed still and watched. He had eaten just two when he seemed to realize he could do better, and he began stuffing his cheeks. Two, four, six, eight of my berries quickly vanished, and the little thief's cheeks puffed up. All the while, he kept eating, making sure not to waste any time. Then he jumped off the cup and skipped from stone to stone until he crossed the stream and vanished into the woods. In a couple of minutes, he was back again, stuffing himself as before, then disappeared again. I imagined he went to tell a friend because a moment later, a bobtail chipmunk showed up, searching for something and going back and forth but not quite finding the spot. Soon, the first chipmunk returned for the third time and seemed a bit pickier. He started sorting through my berries and tasting them to check their quality. However, he didn’t take long to load up again and scamper off. But I'd grown tired of the game, and my berries were noticeably disappearing, so I moved on. What was most interesting about all this was that the little thief took different routes each time and came back in various ways. Was he trying to avoid being caught, or was he sharing the fruits with his friends and neighbors, surprising them with strawberries for lunch?

But I am making slow headway toward finding the birds’-nests, for I had set out on this occasion in hopes of finding a rare nest,—the nest of the black-throated blue-backed warbler, which, it seemed, with one or two others, was still wanting to make the history of our warblers complete. The woods were extensive, and full of deep, dark tangles, and looking for any particular nest seemed about as hopeless a task as searching for a needle in a haystack, as the old saying is. Where to begin, and how? But the principle is the same as in looking for a hen’s nest,—first find your bird, then watch its movements.

But I'm making slow progress in finding the bird nests, because I set out this time hoping to discover a rare one—the nest of the black-throated blue-backed warbler, which, along with a couple of others, still needed to complete the history of our warblers. The woods were vast, filled with deep, dark tangles, and looking for any specific nest felt as impossible as searching for a needle in a haystack, as the saying goes. Where should I start, and how? But the principle is the same as finding a hen’s nest—first locate your bird, then observe its movements.

The bird is in these woods, for I have seen him scores of times, but whether he builds high or low, on the ground or in the trees, is all unknown to me. That is his song now,—“twe-twea-twe-e-e-a,” with a peculiar summer languor and plaintiveness, and issuing from the lower branches and growths. Presently we—for I have been joined by a companion—discover the bird, a male, insecting in the top of a newly fallen hemlock. The black, white, and blue of his uniform are seen at a glance. His movements are quite slow compared with some of the warblers. If he will only betray the locality of that little domicile where his plainly clad mate is evidently sitting, it is all we will ask of him. But this he seems in no wise disposed to do. Here and there, and up and down; we follow him, often losing him, and as often refinding him by his song; but the clew to his nest, how shall we get it? Does he never go home to see how things are getting on, or to see if his presence is not needed, or to take madam a morsel of food? No doubt he keeps within earshot, and a cry of distress or alarm from the mother bird would bring him to the spot in an instant. Would that some evil fate would make her cry, then! Presently he encounters a rival. His feeding-ground infringes upon that of another, and the two birds regard each other threateningly. This is a good sign, for their nests are evidently near.

The bird is in these woods because I’ve seen him many times, but I have no idea if he builds high or low, on the ground or in the trees. That is his song right now—“twe-twea-twe-e-e-a,” with a lazy, sad summer vibe, coming from the lower branches and undergrowth. Soon we—since I’ve been joined by a friend—spot the bird, a male, foraging in the top of a recently fallen hemlock. The black, white, and blue of his feathers are easy to see. His movements are much slower compared to some of the warblers. If he would just lead us to the little home where his plainly dressed mate is clearly sitting, that’s all we’d ask of him. But he doesn’t seem inclined to do that. Here and there, up and down; we follow him, often losing sight of him and then finding him again by his song, but how can we get a clue to his nest? Does he never go home to check how things are going, or to see if he’s needed, or to bring his mate a bit of food? He’s probably keeping close enough to hear, and a cry of distress or alarm from the mother bird would bring him back in an instant. I wish some misfortune would make her cry, then! Soon he runs into a rival. His feeding area overlaps with another bird's territory, and the two square off, watching each other warily. This is a good sign, as their nests are likely close by.

Their battle-cry is a low, peculiar chirp, not very fierce, but bantering and confident. They quickly come to blows, but it is a very fantastic battle, and, as it would seem, indulged in more to satisfy their sense of honor than to hurt each other, for neither party gets the better of the other, and they separate a few paces and sing, and squeak, and challenge each other in a very happy frame of mind. The gauntlet is no sooner thrown down than it is again taken up by one or the other, and in the course of fifteen or twenty minutes they have three or four encounters, separating a little, then provoked to return again like two cocks, till finally they withdraw beyond hearing of each other,—both, no doubt, claiming the victory. But the secret of the nest is still kept. Once I think I have it. I catch a glimpse of a bird which looks like the female, and near by, in a small hemlock about eight feet from the ground, my eye detects a nest. But as I come up under it, I can see daylight through it, and that it is empty,—evidently only part finished, not lined or padded yet. Now if the bird will only return and claim it, the point will be gained. But we wait and watch in vain. The architect has knocked off to-day, and we must come again, or continue our search.

Their battle cry is a low, weird chirp, not very fierce, but teasing and full of confidence. They quickly start fighting, but it's a wild battle, seemingly more about satisfying their sense of honor than actually hurting each other, since neither one gains the upper hand. They break apart a few steps, singing, squeaking, and challenging each other in a cheerful mood. No sooner is the gauntlet thrown down than one of them picks it up again, and over the course of fifteen or twenty minutes, they have three or four encounters, separating for a bit, only to be provoked back like two roosters, until they finally moved out of earshot from each other—both likely claiming victory. But the secret of the nest is still hidden. I think I see it once. I catch a glimpse of a bird that looks like the female, and nearby, in a small hemlock about eight feet off the ground, I spot a nest. But as I approach it, I can see daylight through it, and it's empty—clearly only partially built, not lined or padded yet. Now if the bird would just come back and claim it, the mystery would be solved. But we wait and watch in vain. The builder has taken a break today, and we'll either have to come back or continue searching.

While loitering about here we were much amused by three chipmunks, who seemed to be engaged in some kind of game. It looked very much as if they were playing tag. Round and round they would go, first one taking the lead, then another, all good-natured and gleeful as schoolboys. There is one thing about a chipmunk that is peculiar: he is never more than one jump from home. Make a dive at him anywhere and in he goes. He knows where the hole is, even when it is covered up with leaves. There is no doubt, also, that he has his own sense of humor and fun, as what squirrel has not? I have watched two red squirrels for a half hour coursing through the large trees by the roadside where branches interlocked, and engaged in a game of tag as obviously as two boys. As soon as the pursuer had come up with the pursued, and actually touched him, the palm was his, and away he would go, taxing his wits and his speed to the utmost to elude his fellow.

While hanging out here, we were really entertained by three chipmunks who seemed to be playing some kind of game. It looked a lot like they were playing tag. They ran around in circles, one taking the lead and then another, all cheerful and having fun like schoolboys. There's something unique about a chipmunk: he's never more than one jump away from home. If you make a move towards him anywhere, he dives right in. He knows where his hole is, even if it’s covered with leaves. There's no doubt he has his own sense of humor and fun, just like any squirrel does. I watched two red squirrels for half an hour as they darted through the large trees along the roadside, where the branches intertwined, engaged in a game of tag just like two boys. As soon as the pursuer caught up with the pursued and actually touched him, the victory was his, and off he would go, using all his wits and speed to escape his friend.

Despairing of finding either of the nests of the two males, we pushed on through the woods to try our luck elsewhere. Before long, just as we were about to plunge down a hill into a dense, swampy part of the woods, we discovered a pair of the birds we were in quest of. They had food in their beaks, and, as we paused, showed great signs of alarm, indicating that the nest was in the immediate vicinity. This was enough. We would pause here and find this nest, anyhow. To make a sure thing of it, we determined to watch the parent birds till we had wrung from them their secret. So we doggedly crouched down and watched them, and they watched us. It was diamond cut diamond. But as we felt constrained in our movements, desiring, if possible, to keep so quiet that the birds would, after a while, see in us only two harmless stumps or prostrate logs, we had much the worst of it. The mosquitoes were quite taken with our quiet, and knew us from logs and stumps in a moment. Neither were the birds deceived, not even when we tried the Indian’s tactics, and plumed ourselves with green branches. Ah, the suspicious creatures, how they watched us with the food in their beaks, abstaining for one whole hour from ministering that precious charge which otherwise would have been visited every moment! Quite near us they would come at times, between us and the nest, eying us so sharply. Then they would move off, and apparently try to forget our presence. Was it to deceive us, or to persuade himself and mate that there was no serious cause for alarm, that the male would now and then strike up in full song and move off to some distance through the trees? But the mother bird did not allow herself to lose sight of us at all, and both birds, after carrying the food in their beaks a long time, would swallow it themselves. Then they would obtain another morsel and apparently approach very near the nest, when their caution or prudence would come to their aid, and they would swallow the food and hasten away. I thought the young birds would cry out, but not a syllable from them. Yet this was, no doubt, what kept the parent birds away from the nest. The clamor the young would have set up on the approach of the old with food would have exposed everything.

Despairing of finding either of the nests of the two males, we pushed on through the woods to try our luck elsewhere. Before long, just as we were about to plunge down a hill into a dense, swampy part of the woods, we discovered a pair of the birds we were looking for. They had food in their beaks, and as we paused, they showed great signs of alarm, indicating that the nest was nearby. This was enough. We decided to stop here and find that nest, no matter what. To make sure of it, we decided to watch the parent birds until we figured out their secret. So we crouched down and watched them, and they watched us. It was a standoff. But since we felt limited in our movements, wanting to remain so quiet that the birds would eventually see us as just two harmless stumps or fallen logs, we had the disadvantage. The mosquitoes were quite drawn to our stillness and recognized us as not being logs or stumps in no time. The birds weren’t fooled either, not even when we tried using the Indian’s tactics and adorned ourselves with green branches. Ah, those suspicious creatures, how they kept an eye on us with food in their beaks, refraining for a whole hour from tending to that precious load, which otherwise would have been visited constantly! They would sometimes come quite close, positioned between us and the nest, watching us intently. Then they would move away, seemingly trying to forget we were there. Was it to trick us, or to convince himself and his mate that there was no serious cause for alarm, that the male would occasionally break into song and move off to a distance through the trees? But the female didn’t allow herself to lose sight of us at all, and both birds, after holding the food in their beaks for a long time, would swallow it themselves. Then they would get another piece and seemingly approach the nest closely, but their caution would prevail, and they would swallow the food and hurry away. I thought the young birds would cry out, but not a sound came from them. Yet this was, no doubt, what kept the parent birds away from the nest. The noise the young would have made at the arrival of the adults with food would have exposed everything.

After a time I felt sure I knew within a few feet where the nest was concealed. Indeed, I thought I knew the identical bush. Then the birds approached each other again and grew very confidential about another locality some rods below. This puzzled us, and, seeing the whole afternoon might be spent in this manner, and the mystery unsolved, we determined to change our tactics and institute a thorough search of the locality. This procedure soon brought things to a crisis, for, as my companion clambered over a log by a little hemlock, a few yards from where we had been sitting, with a cry of alarm out sprang the young birds from their nest in the hemlock, and, scampering and fluttering over the leaves, disappeared in different directions. This brought the parent birds on the scene in an agony of alarm. Their distress was pitiful. They threw themselves on the ground at our very feet, and fluttered, and cried, and trailed themselves before us, to draw us away from the place, or distract our attention from the helpless young. I shall not forget the male bird, how bright he looked, how sharp the contrast as he trailed his painted plumage there on the dry leaves. Apparently he was seriously disabled. He would start up as if exerting every muscle to fly away, but no use; down he would come, with a helpless, fluttering motion, before he had gone two yards, and apparently you had only to go and pick him up. But before you could pick him up, he had recovered somewhat and flown a little farther; and thus, if you were tempted to follow him, you would soon find yourself some distance from the scene of the nest, and both old and young well out of your reach. The female bird was not less solicious, and practiced the same arts upon us to decoy us away, but her dull plumage rendered her less noticeable. The male was clad in holiday attire, but his mate in an every-day working-garb.

After a while, I was pretty sure I had a good idea of where the nest was hidden. In fact, I thought I knew the exact bush. Then the birds came together again and seemed to be really focused on another spot a little further down. This confused us, and since we realized we could spend the whole afternoon like this without solving the mystery, we decided to change our approach and do a thorough search of the area. This quickly led to a dramatic moment because as my friend climbed over a log by a small hemlock just a few yards from where we were sitting, a cry of alarm startled the young birds out of their nest in the hemlock. They scurried and fluttered over the leaves, scattering in different directions. This brought the parent birds rushing in, completely frantic. Their distress was heartbreaking. They threw themselves at our feet, fluttering and crying, trying to distract us from the vulnerable chicks. I'll never forget how bright the male bird looked, how striking the contrast as he spread his colorful feathers on the dry leaves. He seemed seriously injured. He would suddenly launch himself as if putting every effort into flying away, but it was no use; he would tumble back down, flapping helplessly before he could get two yards away, and it seemed like you could just reach out and grab him. But before you could do that, he would regain some strength and fly a bit further away; if you followed him, you'd soon find yourself far from the nest, with both the adult and young birds well out of reach. The female bird was just as anxious and tried the same tricks to lure us away, but her dull feathers made her less noticeable. The male was in fancy plumage, while his mate was dressed in everyday colors.

The nest was built in the fork of a little hemlock, about fifteen inches from the ground, and was a thick, firm structure, composed of the finer material of the woods, with a lining of very delicate roots or rootlets. There were four young birds and one addled egg. We found it in a locality about the head-waters of the eastern branch of the Delaware, where several other of the rarer species of warblers, such as the mourning ground, the Blackburnian, the chestnut-sided, and the speckled Canada, spend the summer and rear their young.

The nest was built in the fork of a small hemlock, about fifteen inches off the ground, and was a thick, sturdy structure made up of finer materials from the woods, with a lining of very delicate roots or rootlets. There were four young birds and one unhatched egg. We found it in an area near the headwaters of the eastern branch of the Delaware, where several other rarer warbler species, like the mourning ground, Blackburnian, chestnut-sided, and speckled Canada, spend the summer and raise their young.

Defunct birds’-nests are easy to find; when the leaves fall, then they are in every bush and tree; and one wonders how he missed them; but a live nest, how it eludes one! I have read of a noted criminal who could hide himself pretty effectually in any room that contained the usual furniture; he would embrace the support of a table so as to seem part of it. The bird has studied the same art: it always blends its nest with the surroundings, and sometimes its very openness hides it; the light itself seems to conceal it. Then the birds build anew each year, and so always avail themselves of the present and latest combination of leaves and screens, of light and shade. What was very well concealed one season may be quite exposed the next.

Abandoned bird nests are easy to spot; when the leaves fall, they’re everywhere in bushes and trees, and you wonder how you missed them. But a live nest? That’s a different story! I read about a famous criminal who could hide really well in any room with regular furniture; he would press himself against a table to blend in. Birds have mastered this same skill: they always match their nests to their surroundings, and sometimes their visibility makes them hard to see; even the light seems to hide them. Plus, birds build new nests each year, taking advantage of the latest mix of leaves and cover, of light and shadow. What was well hidden one season might be fully exposed the next.

Going a-fishing or a-berrying is a good introduction to the haunts of the birds, and to their nesting-places. You put forth your hand for the berries, and there is a nest; or your tread by the creeks starts the sandpiper or the water-thrush from the ground where its eggs are concealed, or some shy wood-warbler from a bush. One day, fishing down a deep wooded gorge, my hook caught on a limb overhead, and on pulling it down I found I had missed my trout, but had caught a hummingbird’s nest. It was saddled on the limb as nicely as if it had been a grown part of it.

Going fishing or picking berries is a great way to discover where birds hang out and where they nest. When you reach for the berries, you might find a nest; or when you walk near the streams, you might startle a sandpiper or a water-thrush from the spot where its eggs are hidden, or a timid wood-warbler from a bush. One day, while fishing in a deep wooded canyon, my hook got caught on a branch above me, and when I pulled it down, I realized I had missed my trout but ended up snagging a hummingbird’s nest. It was perfectly resting on the branch as if it was a natural part of it.

Other collectors beside the oölogists are looking for birds’-nests,— the squirrels and owls and jays and crows. The worst depredator in this direction I know of is the fish crow, and I warn him to keep off my premises, and charge every gunner to spare him not. He is a small sneak-thief, and will rob the nest of every robin, wood thrush, and oriole he can come at. I believe he fishes only when he is unable to find birds’ eggs or young birds. The genuine crow, the crow with the honest “caw,” “caw,” I have never caught in such small business, though the kingbird makes no discrimination between them, but accuses both alike.

Other collectors besides the bird egg enthusiasts are on the lookout for birds’ nests—like the squirrels, owls, jays, and crows. The biggest troublemaker in this area that I know of is the fish crow, and I warn him to stay off my property, urging every hunter to not hold back when it comes to him. He’s a small thief who will steal from every robin, wood thrush, and oriole’s nest he can reach. I believe he only goes fishing when he can’t find birds’ eggs or fledglings. The true crow, the one with the authentic “caw,” “caw,” I’ve never seen engage in such petty theft, although the kingbird doesn’t make a distinction between them and scolds both equally.

IX
THE HALCYON IN CANADA

The halcyon or kingfisher is a good guide when you go to the woods. He will not insure smooth water or fair weather, but he knows every stream and lake like a book, and will take you to the wildest and most unfrequented places. Follow his rattle and you shall see the source of every trout and salmon stream on the continent. You shall see the Lake of the Woods, and far-off Athabasca and Abbitibbe, and the unknown streams that flow into Hudson’s Bay, and many others. His time is the time of the trout, too, namely, from April to September. He makes his subterranean nest in the bank of some favorite stream, and then goes on long excursions up and down and over woods and mountains to all the waters within reach, always fishing alone, the true angler that he is, his fellow keeping far ahead or behind, or taking the other branch. He loves the sound of a waterfall, and will sit a long time on a dry limb overhanging the pool below it, and, forgetting his occupation, brood upon his own memories and fancies.

The kingfisher is a great guide when you head into the woods. He won’t guarantee calm waters or nice weather, but he knows every stream and lake like the back of his hand and will lead you to the wildest, least-traveled spots. Follow his call, and you’ll discover the source of every trout and salmon stream on the continent. You’ll see the Lake of the Woods, the distant Athabasca and Abbitibbe, and the uncharted streams that flow into Hudson’s Bay, among many others. His season is the same as the trout's, from April to September. He builds his nest in the bank of a favorite stream and then takes long trips up and down, over woods and mountains to all the nearby waters, always fishing solo, the true angler he is, with his companions either far ahead, lagging behind, or exploring a different route. He loves the sound of a waterfall and will often sit for a long time on a dry branch above the pool below, getting lost in his thoughts and memories.

belted kingfisher

The past season my friend and I took a hint from him, and, when the dog-star began to blaze, set out for Canada, making a big detour to touch at salt water and to take New York and Boston on our way.

Last season, my friend and I took his advice and, when the dog star started shining brightly, headed to Canada, making a big detour to hit the ocean and visit New York and Boston along the way.

The latter city was new to me, and we paused there and angled a couple of days and caught an editor, a philosopher, and a poet, and might have caught more if we had had a mind to, for these waters are full of ’em, and big ones, too.

The latter city was new to me, so we stopped there for a couple of days and met an editor, a philosopher, and a poet. We could have met more if we wanted to because these waters are full of them, and good ones, too.

Coming from the mountainous regions of the Hudson, we saw little in the way of scenery that arrested our attention until we beheld the St. Lawrence, though one gets glimpses now and then, as he is whirled along through New Hampshire and Vermont, that make him wish for a fuller view. It is always a pleasure to bring to pass the geography of one’s boyhood; ’tis like the fulfilling of a dream; hence it was with partial eyes that I looked upon the Merrimac, the Connecticut, and the Passumpsic,—dusky, squaw-colored streams, whose names I had learned so long ago. The traveler opens his eyes a little wider when he reaches Lake Memphremagog, especially if he have the luck to see it under such a sunset as we did, its burnished surface glowing like molten gold. This lake is an immense trough that accommodates both sides of the fence, though by far the larger and longer part of it is in Canada. Its western shore is bold and picturesque, being skirted by a detachment of the Green Mountains, the main range of which is seen careering along the horizon far to the southwest; to the east and north, whither the railroad takes you, the country is flat and monotonous.

Coming from the mountainous areas of the Hudson, we didn’t see much in the way of scenery that caught our attention until we reached the St. Lawrence, although there were glimpses here and there as we passed through New Hampshire and Vermont that made us wish for a better view. It's always a joy to revisit the geography of your childhood; it's like fulfilling a dream. So I looked at the Merrimac, the Connecticut, and the Passumpsic with a sense of nostalgia—dark, earthy streams whose names I had learned long ago. The traveler’s eyes widen a bit more upon arriving at Lake Memphremagog, especially if he’s lucky enough to see it during a sunset like we did, its shimmering surface glowing like molten gold. This lake is a vast basin that covers both sides of the border, although the much larger section is in Canada. Its western shore is bold and scenic, lined with a section of the Green Mountains, while the main range can be seen stretching along the horizon far to the southwest; to the east and north, where the railroad goes, the landscape is flat and dull.

The first peculiarity one notices about the farms in this northern country is the close proximity of the house and barn, in most cases the two buildings touching at some point,—an arrangement doubtless prompted by the deep snows and severe cold of this latitude. The typical Canadian dwelling-house is also presently met with on entering the Dominion,—a low, modest structure of hewn spruce logs, with a steep roof (containing two or more dormer windows) that ends in a smart curve, a hint taken from the Chinese pagoda. Even in the more costly brick or stone houses in the towns and vicinity this style is adhered to. It is so universal that one wonders if the reason of it is not in the climate also, the outward curve of the roof shooting the sliding snow farther away from the dwelling. It affords a wide projection, in many cases covering a veranda, and in all cases protecting the doors and windows without interfering with the light. In the better class of clapboarded houses the finish beneath the projecting eaves is also a sweeping curve, opposing and bracing that of the roof. A two-story country house, or a Mansard roof, I do not remember to have seen in Canada; but in places they have become so enamored of the white of the snow that they even whitewash the roofs of their buildings, giving a cluster of them the impression, at a distance, of an encampment of great tents.

The first thing you notice about the farms in this northern country is how close the house and barn are, often touching at some point. This arrangement is likely due to the heavy snows and harsh cold of this area. The typical Canadian home, which you see as soon as you enter the Dominion, is a low, simple structure made of hewn spruce logs, with a steep roof featuring two or more dormer windows that ends in a stylish curve, inspired by the Chinese pagoda. Even the more expensive brick or stone houses in the towns and surrounding areas follow this style. It’s so common that you start to wonder if it has something to do with the climate, as the upward curve of the roof helps to slide snow away from the house. It creates a wide overhang that often covers a porch and always protects the doors and windows without blocking the light. In higher-quality clapboard houses, the finish below the overhanging eaves also has a sweeping curve that complements and supports the roof's curve. I can’t recall seeing a two-story country house or a Mansard roof in Canada, but in some places, they’ve become so fond of the snow's whiteness that they even whitewash their roofs, making a cluster of buildings look, from a distance, like a camp of large tents.

As we neared Point Levi, opposite Quebec, we got our first view of the St. Lawrence. “Iliad of rivers!” exclaimed my friend. “Yet unsung!” The Hudson must take a back seat now, and a good way back. One of the two or three great watercourses of the globe is before you. No other river, I imagine, carries such a volume of pure cold water to the sea. Nearly all its feeders are trout and salmon streams, and what an airing and what a bleaching it gets on its course! Its history, its antecedents, are unparalleled. The great lakes are its camping-grounds; here its hosts repose under the sun and stars in areas like that of states and kingdoms, and it is its waters that shake the earth at Niagara. Where it receives the Saguenay it is twenty miles wide, and when it debouches into the Gulf it is a hundred. Indeed, it is a chain of Homeric sublimities from beginning to end. The great cataract is a fit sequel to the great lakes; the spirit that is born in vast and tempestuous Superior takes its full glut of power in that fearful chasm. If paradise is hinted in the Thousand Islands, hell is unveiled in that pit of terrors.

As we got closer to Point Levi, across from Quebec, we had our first glimpse of the St. Lawrence. “Heroic river!” my friend exclaimed. “Yet so uncelebrated!” The Hudson has to take a backseat now, and a significant one at that. One of the few great rivers in the world is right in front of you. No other river, I think, delivers such a vast volume of pure cold water to the sea. Almost all of its tributaries are streams full of trout and salmon, and the way it gets aerated and purified along its route is remarkable! Its history and background are unmatched. The great lakes serve as its resting spots; here its multitude relaxes under the sun and stars in areas as large as states and kingdoms, and it’s its waters that create the rumble of Niagara. Where it meets the Saguenay, it’s twenty miles wide, and when it flows into the Gulf, it expands to a hundred. Truly, it’s a chain of epic wonders from start to finish. The magnificent waterfall is a fitting conclusion to the great lakes; the spirit that emerges from the vast and stormy Superior unleashes its full power in that daunting canyon. If paradise whispers in the Thousand Islands, hell is revealed in that pit of nightmares.

Its last escapade is the great rapids above Montreal, down which the steamer shoots with its breathless passengers, after which, inhaling and exhaling its mighty tides, it flows calmly to the sea.

Its final adventure is the massive rapids above Montreal, where the steamer races through with its breathless passengers, after which, inhaling and exhaling its powerful currents, it moves smoothly to the sea.

The St. Lawrence is the type of nearly all the Canadian rivers, which are strung with lakes and rapids and cataracts, and are full of peril and adventure.

The St. Lawrence is typical of almost all Canadian rivers, which are lined with lakes, rapids, and waterfalls, and are full of danger and excitement.

Here we reach the oldest part of the continent, geologists tell us; and here we encounter a fragment of the Old World civilization. Quebec presents the anomaly of a mediéval European city in the midst of the American landscape. This air, this sky, these clouds, these trees, the look of these fields, are what we have always known; but the houses, and streets, and vehicles, and language, and physiognomy are strange. As I walked upon the grand terrace I saw the robin and kingbird and song sparrow, and there in the tree, by the Wolfe Monument, our summer warbler was at home. I presently saw, also, that our republican crow was a British subject, and that he behaved here more like his European brother than he does in the States, being less wild and suspicious. On the Plains of Abraham excellent timothy grass was growing and cattle were grazing. We found a path through the meadow, and, with the exception of a very abundant weed with a blue flower, saw nothing new or strange,—nothing but the steep tin roofs of the city and its frowning wall and citadel. Sweeping around the far southern horizon, we could catch glimpses of mountains that were evidently in Maine or New Hampshire; while twelve or fifteen miles to the north the Laurentian ranges, dark and formidable, arrested the eye. Quebec, or the walled part of it, is situated on a point of land shaped not unlike the human foot, looking northeast, the higher and bolder side being next the river, with the main part of the town on the northern slope toward the St. Charles. Its toes are well down in the mud where this stream joins the St. Lawrence, while the citadel is high on the instep and commands the whole field. The grand Battery is a little below, on the brink of the instep, so to speak, and the promenader looks down several hundred feet into the tops of the chimneys of this part of the lower town, and upon the great river sweeping by northeastward like another Amazon. The heel of our misshapen foot extends indefinitely toward Montreal. Upon it, on a level with the citadel, are the Plains of Abraham. It was up its high, almost perpendicular, sides that Wolfe clambered with his army, and stood in the rear of his enemy one pleasant September morning over a hundred years ago.

Here we arrive at the oldest part of the continent, according to geologists; and here we come across a piece of Old World civilization. Quebec is an anomaly, a medieval European city set in the American landscape. This atmosphere, this sky, these clouds, these trees, and the look of these fields are what we have always known; but the houses, streets, vehicles, language, and people are unfamiliar. As I walked along the grand terrace, I spotted a robin, a kingbird, and a song sparrow, and there in the tree by the Wolfe Monument, our summer warbler was at home. I also noticed that our republican crow was a British subject and acted more like his European counterpart here than he does back in the States, appearing less wild and suspicious. On the Plains of Abraham, lush timothy grass was growing, and cattle were grazing. We found a path through the meadow, and aside from a very plentiful weed with a blue flower, we saw nothing unusual—just the steep tin roofs of the city and its looming wall and citadel. Sweeping around the distant southern horizon, we could see glimpses of mountains that were clearly in Maine or New Hampshire; while about twelve or fifteen miles to the north, the Laurentian ranges, dark and imposing, caught the eye. Quebec, or the fortified part of it, is located on a piece of land shaped somewhat like a human foot, facing northeast, with the higher and more prominent side next to the river, while the main part of the town rests on the northern slope toward the St. Charles. Its toes are deep in the mud where this stream meets the St. Lawrence, while the citadel is high on the instep and overlooks the entire area. The grand Battery is a little lower down, on the edge of the instep, so to speak, and the walker looks down several hundred feet into the tops of the chimneys of this part of the lower town, and upon the great river flowing northeastward like another Amazon. The heel of our oddly shaped foot extends endlessly toward Montreal. On it, at the same level as the citadel, are the Plains of Abraham. It was up its steep, nearly vertical sides that Wolfe climbed with his army, appearing behind his enemy one pleasant September morning over a hundred years ago.

To the north and northeast of Quebec, and in full view from the upper parts of the city, lies a rich belt of agricultural country, sloping gently toward the river, and running parallel with it for many miles, called the Beauport slopes. The division of the land into uniform parallelograms, as in France, was a marked feature, and is so throughout the Dominion. A road ran through the midst of it lined with; trees, and leading to the falls of the Montmorenci. I imagine that this section is the garden of Quebec. Beyond it rose the mountains. Our eyes looked wistfully toward them, for we had decided to penetrate the Canadian woods in that direction.

To the north and northeast of Quebec, visible from the higher parts of the city, is a rich stretch of farmland that gently slopes down to the river and runs parallel to it for many miles, known as the Beauport slopes. The land is divided into uniform rectangular plots, similar to what you’d find in France, and this is a common sight throughout the Dominion. A road runs through the middle of it, lined with trees, leading to the Montmorency Falls. I think of this area as the garden of Quebec. Beyond it rise the mountains. We looked longingly toward them, as we had decided to venture into the Canadian woods in that direction.

One hundred and twenty-five miles from Quebec as the loon flies, almost due north over unbroken spruce forests, lies Lake St. John, the cradle of the terrible Saguenay. On the map it looks like a great cuttlefish with its numerous arms and tentacula reaching out in all directions into the wilds. It is a large oval body of water thirty miles in its greatest diameter. The season here, owing to a sharp northern sweep of the isothermal lines, is two or three weeks earlier than at Quebec. The soil is warm and fertile, and there is a thrifty growing settlement here with valuable agricultural produce, but no market nearer than Quebec, two hundred and fifty miles distant by water, with a hard, tedious land journey besides. In winter the settlement can have little or no communication with the outside world.

One hundred twenty-five miles from Quebec in a straight line, almost directly north over endless spruce forests, is Lake St. John, the birthplace of the formidable Saguenay. On the map, it resembles a large cuttlefish with its many arms and tentacles stretching out in every direction into the wilderness. It's a big oval body of water, thirty miles at its widest point. The season here, due to a sharp northern shift in the isothermal lines, starts two or three weeks earlier than in Quebec. The soil is warm and fertile, and there's a thriving settlement here with valuable agricultural products, but the nearest market is in Quebec, two hundred fifty miles away by water, plus a tough, exhausting land journey. In winter, the settlement has little to no communication with the outside world.

To relieve this isolated colony and encourage further development of the St. John region, the Canadian government is building [footnote: Written in 1877] a wagon-road through the wilderness from Quebec directly to the lake, thus economizing half the distance, as the road when completed will form with the old route, the Saguenay and St. Lawrence, one side of an equilateral triangle. A railroad was projected a few years ago over nearly the same ground, and the contract to build it given to an enterprising Yankee, who pocketed a part of the money and has never been heard of since. The road runs for one hundred miles through an unbroken wilderness, and opens up scores of streams and lakes abounding with trout, into which, until the road-makers fished them, no white man had ever cast a hook.

To support this isolated colony and promote the growth of the St. John region, the Canadian government is constructing [footnote: Written in 1877] a wagon road through the wilderness from Quebec directly to the lake, effectively cutting the distance in half. Once completed, this road will create one side of an equilateral triangle along with the old route, the Saguenay, and the St. Lawrence. A railroad was planned a few years back over almost the same route, and the contract was awarded to a determined American who took some of the funds and disappeared without a trace. The road stretches for one hundred miles through untouched wilderness and opens up numerous streams and lakes rich with trout, where, until the road builders arrived, no white person had ever tried to fish.

It was a good prospect, and we resolved to commit ourselves to the St. John road. The services of a young fellow whom, by reason of his impracticable French name, we called Joe, were secured, and after a delay of twenty-four hours we were packed upon a Canadian buckboard with hard-tack in one bag and oats in another, and the journey began. It was Sunday, and we held up our heads more confidently when we got beyond the throng of well-dressed church-goers. For ten miles we had a good stone road and rattled along it at a lively pace. In about half that distance we came to a large brick church, where we began to see the rural population or habitans. They came mostly in two-wheeled vehicles, some of the carts quite fancy, in which the young fellows rode complacently beside their girls. The two-wheeler predominates in Canada, and is of all styles and sizes. After we left the stone road, we began to encounter the hills that are preliminary to the mountains. The farms looked like the wilder and poorer parts of Maine or New Hampshire. While Joe was getting a supply of hay of a farmer to take into the woods for his horse, I walked through a field in quest of wild strawberries. The season for them was past, it being the 20th of July, and I found barely enough to make me think that the strawberry here is far less pungent and high-flavored than with us.

It was a promising opportunity, so we decided to take the St. John road. We hired a young guy who, because of his difficult French name, we called Joe. After a 24-hour delay, we were all packed into a Canadian buckboard with hardtack in one bag and oats in another, and our journey began. It was Sunday, and we felt more confident when we got past the crowd of well-dressed churchgoers. For ten miles, we had a nice stone road and moved along at a brisk pace. About halfway there, we came across a large brick church and started to see the local people, or habitans. Most of them arrived in two-wheeled vehicles; some of the carts were quite stylish, with young men riding happily alongside their girls. The two-wheeled vehicle is common in Canada and comes in all shapes and sizes. After leaving the stone road, we started to hit the hills that lead to the mountains. The farms looked like the wilder, poorer areas of Maine or New Hampshire. While Joe was getting some hay from a farmer to take into the woods for his horse, I wandered through a field looking for wild strawberries. The season for them was over, being July 20th, and I barely found enough to make me think that these strawberries are far less flavorful and aromatic than the ones back home.

The cattle in the fields and by the roadside looked very small and delicate, the effect, no doubt, of the severe climate. We saw many rude implements of agriculture, such as wooden plows shod with iron.

The cattle in the fields and by the roadside looked very small and fragile, probably due to the harsh climate. We saw many basic farming tools, like wooden plows with iron tips.

We passed several parties of men, women, and children from Quebec picnicking in the “bush.” Here it was little more than a “bush;” but while in Canada we never heard the woods designated by any other term. I noticed, also, that when a distance of a few miles or of a fraction of a mile is to be designated, the French Canadian does not use the term “miles,” but says it’s so many acres through, or to the next place.

We passed several groups of men, women, and children from Quebec having picnics in the woods. To us, it was hardly more than a bush, but while in Canada, we never heard the woods referred to by any other name. I also noticed that when they wanted to refer to a distance of a few miles or just a small fraction of a mile, the French Canadians didn’t use the word “miles.” Instead, they would say it was so many acres across, or to the next spot.

This fondness for the “bush” at this season seems quite a marked feature in the social life of the average Quebecker, and is one of the original French traits that holds its own among them. Parties leave the city in carts and wagons by midnight, or earlier, and drive out as far as they can the remainder of the night, in order to pass the whole Sunday in the woods, despite the mosquitoes and black flies. Those we saw seemed a decent, harmless set, whose idea of a good time was to be in the open air, and as far into the “bush” as possible.

This love for the wilderness during this time of year is a notable aspect of the social life of the average Quebecker and is one of the authentic French traits that persists among them. Groups leave the city in carts and wagons by midnight or earlier, driving out as far as they can for the rest of the night to spend the entire Sunday in the woods, despite the mosquitoes and black flies. The people we encountered seemed like a decent, harmless bunch, whose idea of fun was to be outdoors and as deep in the wilderness as possible.

The post-road, as the new St. John’s road is also called, begins twenty miles from Quebec at Stoneham, the farthest settlement. Five miles into the forest upon the new road is the hamlet of La Chance, the last house till you reach the lake, one hundred and twenty miles distant. Our destination the first night was La Chance’s; this would enable us to reach the Jacques Cartier River, forty miles farther, where we proposed to encamp, in the afternoon of the next day.

The post-road, which is also known as the new St. John’s road, starts twenty miles from Quebec at Stoneham, the last settlement. Five miles into the woods on this new road is the village of La Chance, the final house until you get to the lake, one hundred and twenty miles away. Our first night's destination was La Chance; this would allow us to reach the Jacques Cartier River, forty miles further, where we planned to camp the next afternoon.

We were now fairly among the mountains, and the sun was well down behind the trees when we entered upon the post-road. It proved to be a wide, well-built highway, grass-grown, but in good condition. After an hour’s travel we began to see signs of a clearing, and about six o’clock drew up in front of the long, low, log habitation of La Chance. Their hearthstone was outdoor at this season, and its smoke rose through the still atmosphere in a frail column toward the sky. The family was gathered here and welcomed us cordially as we drew up, the master shaking us by the hand as if we were old friends. His English was very poor, and our French was poorer, but, with Joe as a bridge between us, communication on a pinch was kept up. His wife could speak no English; but her true French politeness and graciousness was a language we could readily understand. Our supper was got ready from our own supplies, while we sat or stood in the open air about the fire. The clearing comprised fifty or sixty acres of rough land in the bottom of a narrow valley, and bore indifferent crops of oats, barley, potatoes, and timothy grass. The latter was just in bloom, being a month or more later than with us. The primitive woods, mostly of birch with a sprinkling of spruce, put a high cavernous wall about the scene. How sweetly the birds sang, their notes seeming to have unusual strength and volume in this forest-bound opening! The principal singer was the white-throated sparrow, which we heard and saw everywhere on the route. He is called here le siffleur (the whistler), and very delightful his whistle was. From the forest came the evening hymn of a thrush, the olive-backed perhaps, like but less clear and full than the veery’s.

We were now pretty deep in the mountains, and the sun was getting low behind the trees when we hit the main road. It turned out to be a wide, well-built highway, overgrown with grass but still in good shape. After an hour of traveling, we started to see signs of a clearing, and around six o’clock, we arrived in front of the long, low log cabin of La Chance. Their hearthstone was outdoors this season, and its smoke rose in a delicate column into the still sky. The family was gathered there and welcomed us warmly as we pulled up, the man shaking our hands like we were old friends. His English was pretty poor, and our French was even worse, but with Joe acting as our translator, we managed to communicate when needed. His wife didn’t speak any English, but her genuine French politeness and warmth were a language we easily understood. Our supper was prepared from our own supplies while we sat or stood in the open air around the fire. The clearing covered fifty or sixty acres of rough land in a narrow valley and yielded mediocre crops of oats, barley, potatoes, and timothy grass. The latter was just blooming, about a month or so behind what we were used to. The primitive woods, mostly birch with a few spruces, created a tall, cavernous wall around the scene. How beautifully the birds sang, their notes seeming to have unusual strength and volume in this forested area! The main vocalist was the white-throated sparrow, which we heard and saw everywhere on the route. Here, he's called le siffleur (the whistler), and his whistle was truly delightful. From the forest came the evening song of a thrush, likely the olive-backed, like but less clear and full than the veery’s.

In the evening we sat about the fire in rude homemade chairs, and had such broken and disjointed talk as we could manage. Our host had lived in Quebec and been a school-teacher there; he had wielded the birch until he lost his health, when he came here and the birches gave it back to him. He was now hearty and well, and had a family of six or seven children about him.

In the evening, we gathered around the fire in makeshift homemade chairs and had the fragmented conversations we could manage. Our host had lived in Quebec and worked as a schoolteacher there; he had used a birch rod for discipline until it affected his health. When he moved here, the birch trees restored his well-being. Now, he was strong and healthy, with a family of six or seven kids around him.

We were given a good bed that night, and fared better than we expected. About one o’clock I was awakened by suppressed voices outside the window. Who could it be? Had a band of brigands surrounded the house? As our outfit and supplies had not been removed from the wagon in front of the door I got up, and, lifting one corner of the window paper, peeped out: I saw in the dim moonlight four or five men standing about engaged in low conversation. Presently one of the men advanced to the door and began to rap and call the name of our host. Then I knew their errand was not hostile; but the weird effect of that regular alternate rapping and calling ran through my dream all the rest of the night. Rat-tat, tat, tat,—La Chance; rat-tat, tat,—La Chance, five or six times repeated before La Chance heard and responded. Then the door opened and they came in, when it was jabber, jabber, jabber in the next room till I fell asleep.

We had a decent bed that night and ended up doing better than we thought. Around one o’clock, I was woke up by hushed voices outside the window. Who could it be? Had a gang of thieves surrounded the house? Since our gear and supplies were still in the wagon in front of the door, I got up and peeked out by lifting one corner of the window covering. Through the dim moonlight, I spotted four or five guys standing around talking quietly. Soon, one of the men walked up to the door and started knocking and calling out our host’s name. That’s when I realized they weren’t there to cause trouble; however, the strange rhythm of the knocking and calling haunted my dreams for the rest of the night. Rat-tat, tat, tat—La Chance; rat-tat, tat—La Chance, repeated five or six times before La Chance finally heard and answered. Then the door opened, and it turned into a chatter-fest in the next room until I fell asleep.

In the morning, to my inquiry as to who the travelers were and what they wanted, La Chance said they were old acquaintances going a-fishing, and had stopped to have a little talk.

In the morning, when I asked La Chance who the travelers were and what they wanted, he said they were old friends going fishing and had stopped for a quick chat.

Breakfast was served early, and we were upon the road before the sun. Then began a forty-mile ride through a dense Canadian spruce forest over the drift and boulders of the paleozoic age. Up to this point the scenery had been quite familiar,—not much unlike that of the Catskills,—but now there was a change; the birches disappeared, except now and then a slender white or paper birch, and spruce everywhere prevailed. A narrow belt on each side of the road had been blasted by fire, and the dry, white stems of the trees stood stark and stiff. The road ran pretty straight, skirting the mountains and threading the valleys, and hour after hour the dark, silent woods wheeled past us. Swarms of black flies—those insect wolves—waylaid us and hung to us till a smart spurt of the horse, where the road favored, left them behind. But a species of large horse-fly, black and vicious, it was not so easy to get rid of. When they alighted upon the horse, we would demolish them with the whip or with our felt hats, a proceeding the horse soon came to understand and appreciate. The white and gray Laurentian boulders lay along the roadside. The soil seemed as if made up of decayed and pulverized rock, and doubtless contained very little vegetable matter. It is so barren that it will never repay clearing and cultivating.

Breakfast was served early, and we were on the road before sunrise. Then began a forty-mile ride through a dense Canadian spruce forest over the drift and boulders from the Paleozoic era. Up to this point, the scenery had been quite familiar—not much different from that of the Catskills—but now there was a change; the birches disappeared, except for an occasional slender white or paper birch, and spruces were everywhere. A narrow strip on both sides of the road had been scorched by fire, with the dry, white stems of the trees standing stark and stiff. The road ran fairly straight, skirting the mountains and threading through the valleys, and hour after hour, the dark, silent woods passed by us. Swarms of black flies—those insect wolves—ambushed us and clung to us until a quick burst of speed from the horse, where the road allowed, left them behind. However, a type of large horse-fly, black and nasty, was not so easy to shake off. When they landed on the horse, we would crush them with the whip or our felt hats, a tactic the horse soon came to understand and appreciate. The white and gray Laurentian boulders lined the roadside. The soil seemed to consist of decayed and crushed rock, and it likely contained very little organic matter. It’s so barren that it would never be worth clearing and farming.

Our course was an up-grade toward the highlands that separate the watershed of St. John Lake from that of the St. Lawrence, and as we proceeded the spruce became smaller and smaller till the trees were seldom more than eight or ten inches in diameter. Nearly all of them terminated in a dense tuft at the top, beneath which the stem would be bare for several feet, giving them the appearance, my friend said, as they stood sharply defined along the crests of the mountains, of cannon swabs. Endless, interminable successions of these cannon swabs, each just like its fellow, came and went, came and went, all day. Sometimes we could see the road a mile or two ahead, and it was as lonely and solitary as a path in the desert. Periods of talk and song and jollity were succeeded by long stretches of silence. A buckboard upon such a road does not conduce to a continuous flow of animal spirits. A good brace for the foot and a good hold for the hand is one’s main lookout much of the time. We walked up the steeper hills, one of them nearly a mile long, then clung grimly to the board during the rapid descent of the other side.

Our path was an upgrade toward the highlands that separate the watersheds of St. John Lake and the St. Lawrence. As we moved forward, the spruce trees grew smaller until they were rarely more than eight or ten inches in diameter. Almost all of them had a dense tuft at the top, with the trunk bare for several feet, making them look, as my friend remarked, like cannon swabs standing sharply defined along the mountain crests. Endless, never-ending rows of these cannon swabs, each one just like the last, came and went all day. Sometimes we could see the road a mile or two ahead, and it felt as lonely and solitary as a path in the desert. Periods of chatting, singing, and having fun were followed by long stretches of silence. Riding on such a road doesn’t really lift your spirits. Most of the time, what you need is a good grip for your feet and a solid hold for your hands. We walked up the steeper hills, one of which was nearly a mile long, and then clung on tightly to the board during the rapid descent on the other side.

We occasionally saw a solitary pigeon—in every instance a cock—leading a forlorn life in the wood, a hermit of his kind, or more probably a rejected and superfluous male. We came upon two or three broods of spruce grouse in the road, so tame that one could have knocked them over with poles. We passed many beautiful lakes; among others, the Two Sisters, one on each side of the road. At noon we paused at a lake in a deep valley, and fed the horse and had lunch. I was not long in getting ready my fishing tackle, and, upon a raft made of two logs pinned together, floated out upon the lake and quickly took all the trout we wanted.

We occasionally spotted a lone pigeon—always a male—living a lonely life in the woods, like a hermit, or more likely a rejected and unnecessary male. We came across a couple of broods of spruce grouse in the road, so tame that you could have easily knocked them over with poles. We passed many beautiful lakes, including the Two Sisters, one on each side of the road. At noon, we stopped at a lake in a deep valley to feed the horse and have lunch. I quickly got my fishing gear ready and floated out onto the lake on a raft made from two logs tied together, and I quickly caught all the trout we wanted.

Early in the afternoon we entered upon what is called La Grande Brûlure, or Great Burning, and to the desolation of living woods succeeded the greater desolation of a blighted forest. All the mountains and valleys, as far as the eye could see, had been swept by the fire, and the bleached and ghostly skeletons of the trees alone met the gaze. The fire had come over from the Saguenay, a hundred or more miles to the east, seven or eight years before, and had consumed or blasted everything in its way. We saw the skull of a moose said to have perished in the fire. For three hours we rode through this valley and shadow of death. In the midst of it, where the trees had nearly all disappeared, and where the ground was covered with coarse wild grass, we came upon the Morancy River, a placid yellow stream twenty or twenty-five yards wide, abounding with trout. We walked a short distance along its banks and peered curiously into its waters. The mountains on either hand had been burned by the fire until in places their great granite bones were bare and white.

Early in the afternoon, we entered what is called La Grande Brûlure, or Great Burning, and the ruined living woods gave way to an even greater destruction of a charred forest. All the mountains and valleys stretched as far as we could see had been swept by the fire, leaving only the bleached, ghostly skeletons of the trees. The fire had spread from the Saguenay, over a hundred miles to the east, seven or eight years earlier, and had destroyed everything in its path. We spotted the skull of a moose that supposedly perished in the flames. For three hours, we rode through this valley and the shadow of death. In the midst of it, where nearly all the trees had vanished and the ground was covered with coarse wild grass, we found the Morancy River, a calm yellow stream about twenty to twenty-five yards wide, teeming with trout. We walked a short way along its banks, peering curiously into its waters. The mountains on either side had been scorched by the fire, leaving their great granite bones bare and white in some places.

At another point we were within ear-shot, for a mile or more, of a brawling stream in the valley below us, and now and then caught a glimpse of foaming rapids or cascades through the dense spruce,—a trout stream that probably no man had ever fished, as it would be quite impossible to do so in such a maze and tangle of woods.

At another point, we were within earshot, for a mile or more, of a noisy stream in the valley below us, and every now and then we caught a glimpse of foaming rapids or cascades through the dense spruce—a trout stream that probably no one had ever fished, since it would be really difficult to do so in such a maze and tangle of woods.

We neither met, nor passed, nor saw any travelers till late in the afternoon, when we descried far ahead a man on horseback. It was a welcome relief. It was like a sail at sea. When he saw us he drew rein and awaited our approach. He, too, had probably tired of the solitude and desolation of the road. He proved to be a young Canadian going to join the gang of workmen at the farther end of the road.

We didn’t meet, pass, or see any travelers until late in the afternoon, when we spotted a man on horseback far ahead. It was a welcome sight, like seeing a sail on the sea. When he noticed us, he stopped and waited for us to reach him. He had probably also grown tired of the loneliness and emptiness of the road. He turned out to be a young Canadian heading to join the group of workers at the end of the road.

About four o’clock we passed another small lake, and in a few moments more drew up at the bridge over the Jacques Cartier River, and our forty-mile ride was finished. There was a stable here that had been used by the road-builders, and was now used by the teams that hauled in their supplies. This would do for the horse; a snug log shanty built by an old trapper and hunter for use in the winter, a hundred yards below the bridge, amid the spruces on the bank of the river, when rebedded and refurnished, would do for us. The river at this point was a swift, black stream from thirty to forty feet wide, with a strength and a bound like a moose. It was not shrunken and emaciated, like similar streams in a cleared country, but full, copious, and strong. Indeed, one can hardly realize how the lesser water-courses have suffered by the denuding of the land of its forest covering, until he goes into the primitive woods and sees how bounding and athletic they are there. They are literally well fed, and their measure of life is full. In fact, a trout brook is as much a thing of the woods as a moose or deer, and will not thrive well in the open country.

At around four o’clock, we passed another small lake, and shortly after, we arrived at the bridge over the Jacques Cartier River, completing our forty-mile ride. There was a stable here that the road builders had used, and it was now used by the teams bringing in supplies. This would work for the horse; a cozy log cabin built by an old trapper and hunter for winter use, a hundred yards down from the bridge, among the spruces by the riverbank, would be suitable for us after it was cleaned up and furnished. The river here was a fast, deep stream, about thirty to forty feet wide, powerful and lively like a moose. It wasn't small and weak like similar streams in cleared areas, but full, abundant, and strong. In fact, you can hardly grasp how the smaller waterways have suffered from the deforestation until you venture into the untouched woods and see how vibrant and lively they are there. They're literally well-nourished, and their life is thriving. A trout stream is just as much a part of the woods as a moose or deer, and it doesn't do well in open country.

Three miles above our camp was Great Lake Jacques Cartier, the source of the river, a sheet of water nine miles long and from one to three wide; fifty rods below was Little Lake Jacques Cartier, an irregular body about two miles across. Stretching away on every hand, bristling on the mountains and darkling in the valleys, was the illimitable spruce woods. The moss in them covered the ground nearly knee-deep, and lay like newly fallen snow, hiding rocks and logs, filling depressions, and muffling the foot. When it was dry, one could find a most delightful couch anywhere.

Three miles above our camp was Great Lake Jacques Cartier, the source of the river, a body of water nine miles long and between one to three miles wide; fifty rods below was Little Lake Jacques Cartier, an uneven shape about two miles across. Stretching out in every direction, towering in the mountains and shadowy in the valleys, was the endless spruce forest. The moss on the ground was almost knee-deep, resembling freshly fallen snow, covering rocks and logs, filling in low spots, and softening footsteps. When it was dry, you could find a lovely place to sit anywhere.

The spruce seems to have colored the water, which is a dark amber color, but entirely sweet and pure. There needed no better proof of the latter fact than the trout with which it abounded, and their clear and vivid tints. In its lower portions near the St. Lawrence, the Jacques Cartier River is a salmon stream, but these fish have never been found as near its source as we were, though there is no apparent reason why they should not be.

The spruce appears to have changed the water's color to a dark amber, yet it remains completely sweet and pure. The presence of trout swimming in it, with their bright and clear colors, serves as perfect evidence for this purity. In the lower sections near the St. Lawrence, the Jacques Cartier River is known as a salmon stream, but these fish have never been spotted as close to the source as we were, even though there's no clear reason why they shouldn't be.

There is perhaps no moment in the life of an angler fraught with so much eagerness and impatience as when he first finds himself upon the bank of a new and long-sought stream. When I was a boy and used to go a-fishing, I could seldom restrain my eagerness after I arrived in sight of the brook or pond, and must needs run the rest of the way. Then the delay in rigging my tackle was a trial my patience was never quite equal to. After I had made a few casts, or had caught one fish, I could pause and adjust my line properly. I found some remnant of the old enthusiasm still in me when I sprang from the buckboard that afternoon and saw the strange river rushing by. I would have given something if my tackle had been rigged so that I could have tried on the instant the temper of the trout that had just broken the surface within easy reach of the shore. But I had anticipated this moment coming along, and had surreptitiously undone my rod-case and got my reel out of my bag, and was therefore a few moments ahead of my companion in making the first cast. The trout rose readily, and almost too soon we had more than enough for dinner, though no “rod-smashers” had been seen or felt. Our experience the next morning, and during the day and the next morning, in the lake, in the rapids, in the pools, was about the same: there was a surfeit of trout eight or ten inches long, though we rarely kept any under ten, but the big fish were lazy and would not rise; they were in the deepest water and did not like to get up.

There’s probably no moment in an angler's life filled with as much excitement and impatience as when he first stands on the bank of a new, long-anticipated stream. When I was a kid and went fishing, I could hardly contain my eagerness once I spotted the brook or pond, and I would run the rest of the way. The wait to set up my tackle was a test of my patience that I never quite mastered. After a few casts or catching one fish, I could take a break and properly adjust my line. I felt a spark of that old enthusiasm still inside me when I jumped off the buckboard that afternoon and saw the unfamiliar river rushing by. I would have done almost anything to have my tackle ready so I could immediately test the waters for the trout that had just broken the surface close to the shore. But I had seen this moment coming and had quietly undone my rod-case and taken my reel out of my bag, so I was a few moments ahead of my friend in making the first cast. The trout were eager to bite, and before long, we had more than enough for dinner, even though we didn’t catch any “rod-smashers.” Our experience the following morning, throughout the day, and into the next morning at the lake, in the rapids, and in the pools was pretty much the same: we had an abundance of trout around eight or ten inches long, though we seldom kept any under ten, but the bigger fish were sluggish and wouldn’t rise; they were deep in the water and didn’t want to come up.

The third day, in the afternoon, we had our first and only thorough sensation in the shape of a big trout. It came none too soon. The interest had begun to flag. But one big fish a week will do. It is a pinnacle of delight in the angler’s experience that he may well be three days in working up to, and, once reached, it is three days down to the old humdrum level again. At least it is with me. It was a dull, rainy day; the fog rested low upon the mountains, and the time hung heavily on our hands. About three o’clock the rain slackened and we emerged from our den, Joe going to look after his horse, which had eaten but little since coming into the woods, the poor creature was so disturbed by the loneliness and the black flies; I, to make preparations for dinner, while my companion lazily took his rod and stepped to the edge of the big pool in front of camp. At the first introductory cast, and when his fly was not fifteen feet from him upon the water, there was a lunge and a strike, and apparently the fisherman had hooked a boulder. I was standing a few yards below, engaged in washing out the coffee-pail, when I heard him call out:—

The third day, in the afternoon, we finally had our first and only real excitement in the form of a big trout. It was well overdue. Our interest had started to fade. But catching one big fish a week is more than enough. It’s a highlight in an angler’s journey that might take days to build up to, and once it happens, it’s back to the routine for the next three days. At least that’s how it is for me. It was a dull, rainy day; the fog hung low over the mountains, and time dragged on. Around three o’clock, the rain let up, and we came out from our shelter, Joe going to check on his horse, which hadn’t eaten much since we got into the woods; the poor thing was anxious from the solitude and bothered by the black flies. I went to get dinner ready while my friend lazily took his rod and stepped to the edge of the big pool in front of our camp. With his first cast, and when his fly was no more than fifteen feet away on the water, there was a sudden lunge and a strike, and it seemed like he had hooked a boulder. I was standing a few yards down, busy washing out the coffee pot, when I heard him shout:—

“I have got him now!”

“I've got him now!”

“Yes, I see you have,” said I, noticing his bending pole and moveless line; “when I am through, I will help you get loose.”

“Yeah, I see you have,” I said, noticing his bent pole and still line; “when I’m done, I’ll help you get free.”

“No, but I’m not joking,” said he; “I have got a big fish.”

“No, I'm serious,” he said; “I caught a big fish.”

I looked up again, but saw no reason to change my impression, and kept on with my work.

I looked up again, but didn’t see any reason to change my mind, so I continued with my work.

It is proper to say that my companion was a novice at fly-fishing, never having cast a fly till upon this trip.

It’s fair to say that my companion was a beginner at fly-fishing, having never cast a fly before this trip.

Again he called out to me, but, deceived by his coolness and nonchalant tones, and by the lethargy a glimpse of the fish, I gave little heed. of the fish, I gave little heed. I knew very well that, if I had struck a fish that held me down in that way, I should have been going through a regular war-dance on that circle of boulder-tops, and should have scared the game into activity if the hook had failed to wake him up. But as the farce continued I drew near.

Again he called out to me, but, fooled by his calmness and relaxed tone, and by the lethargy from just seeing the fish, I paid little attention. I knew very well that if I had caught a fish that pulled me down like that, I would have been dancing around those boulders, and I would have scared the fish into action even if the hook hadn't roused it. But as the act went on, I moved closer.

“Does that look like a stone or a log?” said my friend, pointing to his quivering line, slowly cutting the current up toward the centre of the pool.

“Does that look like a stone or a log?” my friend said, pointing to his wiggling line, slowly moving against the current toward the center of the pool.

My skepticism vanished in an instant, and I could hardly keep my place on the top of the rock.

My skepticism disappeared in a moment, and I could barely maintain my balance on top of the rock.

“I can feel him breathe,” said the now warming fisherman; “just feel of that pole!”

“I can feel him breathing,” said the fisherman, now warming up; “just feel that rod!”

I put my eager hand upon the butt, and could easily imagine I felt the throb or pant of something alive down there in the black depths. But whatever it was moved about like a turtle. My companion was praying to hear his reel spin, but it gave out now and then only a few hesitating clicks. Still the situation was excitingly dramatic, and we were all actors. I rushed for the landing-net, but being unable to find it, shouted desperately for Joe, who came hurrying back, excited before he had learned what the matter was. The net had been left at the lake below, and must be had with the greatest dispatch. In the mean time I skipped about from boulder to boulder as the fish worked this way or that about the pool, peering into the water to catch a glimpse of him, for he had begun to yield a little to the steady strain that was kept upon him. Presently I saw a shadowy, unsubstantial something just emerge from the black depths, then vanish. Then I saw it again, and this time the huge proportions of the fish were faintly outlined by the white facings of his fins. The sketch lasted but a twinkling; it was only a flitting shadow upon a darker background, but it gave me the profoundest Ike Walton thrill I ever experienced. I had been a fisher from my earliest boyhood. I came from a race of fishers; trout streams gurgled about the roots of the family tree, and there was a long accumulated and transmitted tendency and desire in me that that sight gratified. I did not wish the pole in my own hands; there was quite enough electricity overflowing from it and filling the air for me. The fish yielded more and more to the relentless pole, till, in about fifteen minutes from the time he was struck, he came to the surface, then made a little whirlpool where he disappeared again.

I placed my eager hand on the rod and could easily imagine feeling the throb or pull of something alive down there in the black depths. But whatever it was moved around like a turtle. My friend was hoping to hear his reel spin, but it only made a few hesitant clicks now and then. Still, the situation was thrillingly dramatic, and we were all part of the show. I rushed for the landing net, but when I couldn't find it, I shouted desperately for Joe, who hurried back, already excited before he knew what was going on. The net had been left at the lake below and needed to be retrieved quickly. In the meantime, I jumped from boulder to boulder as the fish moved around the pool, peering into the water to catch a glimpse of it, as it began to yield a bit to the constant strain on it. Suddenly, I saw a shadowy something briefly emerge from the black depths before disappearing again. Then I spotted it again, and this time the large shape of the fish was faintly outlined by the white edges of its fins. The sight lasted only a moment—it was just a fleeting shadow against a darker background—but it gave me the most intense thrill I ever experienced, reminding me of the excitement of fishing. I had been a fisherman since childhood. I came from a long line of anglers; trout streams flowed around the roots of my family tree, and deep in my bones was an inherited passion that that sight satisfied. I didn't need the pole in my own hands; there was enough energy buzzing in the air from it for me. The fish gave in more and more to the relentless pole until, about fifteen minutes after it was hooked, it surfaced and created a small whirlpool before disappearing again.

But presently he was up a second time, and lashing the water into foam as the angler led him toward the rock upon which I was perched net in hand. As I reached toward him, down he went again, and, taking another circle of the pool, came up still more exhausted, when, between his paroxysms, I carefully ran the net over him and lifted him ashore, amid, it is needless to say, the wildest enthusiasm of the spectators. The congratulatory laughter of the loons down on the lake showed how even the outsiders sympathized. Much larger trout have been taken in these waters and in others, but this fish would have swallowed any three we had ever before caught.

But soon he was up again, splashing the water into foam as the fisherman led him toward the rock where I was perched with my net ready. As I reached for him, he dove down again, and after another lap around the pool, he rose up even more exhausted. In between his struggles, I carefully brought the net over him and lifted him onto the shore, all to the wild excitement of the onlookers. The congratulatory laughter of the loons down on the lake showed how even the bystanders were cheering us on. Much bigger trout have been caught in these waters and others, but this fish could have eaten any three we had ever caught before.

“What does he weigh?” was the natural inquiry of each; and we took turns “hefting” him. But gravity was less potent to us just then than usual, and the fish seemed astonishingly light.

“What does he weigh?” was the natural question from everyone; and we took turns “hefting” him. But gravity felt lighter to us at that moment, and the fish seemed surprisingly light.

“Four pounds,” we said; but Joe said more. So we improvised a scale: a long strip of board was balanced across a stick, and our groceries served as weights. A four-pound package of sugar kicked the beam quickly; a pound of coffee was added; still it went up; then a pound of tea, and still the fish had a little the best of it. But we called it six pounds, not to drive too sharp a bargain with fortune, and were more than satisfied. Such a beautiful creature! marked in every respect like a trout of six inches. We feasted our eyes upon him for half an hour. We stretched him upon the ground and admired him; we laid him across a log and withdrew a few paces and admired him; we hung him against the shanty, and turned our heads from side to side as women do when they are selecting dress goods, the better to take in the full force of the effect.

“Four pounds,” we said; but Joe thought it was more. So we made a makeshift scale: a long board balanced on a stick, with our groceries as weights. A four-pound bag of sugar tipped the scale immediately; we added a pound of coffee, and it still didn't budge; then we added a pound of tea, yet the fish still had a slight edge. But we decided on six pounds, not wanting to push our luck too much, and were more than happy with that. What a gorgeous creature! It looked just like a six-inch trout. We marveled at it for half an hour. We laid it on the ground and admired it; we draped it over a log, stepped back, and admired it some more; we hung it on the shanty and tilted our heads side to side like women do when picking out fabric, taking in the full impact of its appearance.

He graced the board or stump that afternoon, and was the sweetest fish we had taken. The flesh was a deep salmon-color and very rich. We had before discovered that there were two varieties of trout in these waters, irrespective of size,—the red-fleshed and the white-fleshed,—and that the former were the better.

He showed up on the board or stump that afternoon, and he was the best fish we had caught. The flesh was a deep salmon color and really rich. We had already figured out that there were two kinds of trout in these waters, regardless of size—the red-fleshed and the white-fleshed—and that the red-fleshed ones were better.

This success gave an impetus to our sport that carried us through the rest of the week finely. We had demonstrated that there were big trout here, and that they would rise to a fly. Henceforth big fish were looked to as a possible result of every excursion. To me, especially, the desire at least to match my companion, who had been my pupil in the art, was keen and constant. We built a raft of logs and upon it I floated out upon the lake, whipping its waters right and left, morning, noon, and night. Many fine trout came to my hand, and were released because they did not fill the bill.

This success gave a boost to our sport that carried us through the rest of the week really well. We showed that there were big trout here and that they would take a fly. From that point on, big fish were expected as a possible outcome of every outing. For me, especially, the urge to at least match my friend, who had been my student in the skill, was strong and constant. We built a raft from logs, and I floated out on the lake, casting my line in all directions, morning, noon, and night. I caught many nice trout, but I released them because they didn’t meet the size I wanted.

The lake became my favorite resort, while my companion preferred rather the shore or the long still pool above, where there was a rude makeshift of a boat, made of common box-boards.

The lake became my favorite getaway, while my friend preferred the shore or the long, calm pool above, where there was a rough makeshift boat made of regular wooden planks.

Upon the lake you had the wildness and solitude at arm’s length, and could better take their look and measure. You became something apart from them; you emerged and had a vantage-ground like that of a mountain peak, and could contemplate them at your ease. Seated upon my raft and slowly carried by the current or drifted by the breeze, I had many a long, silent look into the face of the wilderness, and found the communion good. I was alone with the spirit of the forest-bound lakes, and felt its presence and magnetism. I played hide-and-seek with it about the nooks and corners, and lay in wait for it upon a little island crowned with a clump of trees that was moored just to one side of the current near the head of the lake.

On the lake, you were close to wildness and solitude, able to really see and understand them. You became separate from them; you rose up and had a perspective like that of a mountain peak, allowing you to observe them comfortably. Sitting on my raft, gently moved by the current or pushed by the breeze, I spent many quiet moments gazing into the face of the wilderness and found it enriching. I was alone with the spirit of the forested lakes, feeling its presence and pull. I played hide-and-seek with it in the little nooks and crannies and waited for it on a small island topped with a cluster of trees, anchored just off to one side of the current near the lake's head.

Indeed, there is no depth of solitude that the mind does not endow with some human interest. As in a dead silence the ear is filled with its own murmur, so amid these aboriginal scenes one’s feelings and sympathies become external to him, as it were, and he holds converse with them. Then a lake is the ear as well as the eye of a forest. It is the place to go to listen and ascertain what sounds are abroad in the air. They all run quickly thither and report. If any creature had called in the forest for miles about, I should have heard it. At times I could hear the distant roar of water off beyond the outlet of the lake. The sound of the vagrant winds purring here and there in the tops of the spruces reached my ear. A breeze would come slowly down the mountain, then strike the lake, and I could see its footsteps approaching by the changed appearance of the water. How slowly the winds move at times, sauntering like one on a Sunday walk! A breeze always enlivens the fish; a dead calm and all pennants sink, your activity with your fly is ill-timed, and you soon take the hint and stop. Becalmed upon my raft, I observed, as I have often done before, that the life of Nature ebbs and flows, comes and departs, in these wilderness scenes; one moment her stage is thronged and the next quite deserted. Then there is a wonderful unity of movement in the two elements, air and water. When there is much going on in one, there is quite sure to be much going on in the other. You have been casting, perhaps, for an hour with scarcely a jump or any sign of life anywhere about you, when presently the breeze freshens and the trout begin to respond, and then of a sudden all the performers rush in: ducks come sweeping by; loons laugh and wheel overhead, then approach the water on a long, gentle incline, plowing deeper and deeper into its surface, until their momentum is arrested, or converted into foam; the fish hawk screams; the bald eagle goes flapping by, and your eyes and hands are full. Then the tide ebbs, and both fish and fowl are gone.

Indeed, there's no level of solitude that the mind doesn't fill with some human interest. Just as in dead silence the ear picks up its own murmurs, in these primitive settings one’s feelings and sympathies seem to become separate, and you find yourself engaging with them. A lake serves as both the ear and the eye of a forest. It’s the spot to go listen and figure out what sounds are in the air. Everything rushes there to report back. If any creature had called out in the forest for miles around, I would have heard it. Sometimes, I could hear the distant roar of water beyond the lake’s outlet. The sound of the wandering winds rustling through the tops of the spruces reached me. A breeze would slowly come down the mountain, then hit the lake, and I could see its approach by the changing look of the water. How slowly the winds can move at times, sauntering like someone on a Sunday stroll! A breeze always stirs the fish; in a dead calm, all the sails drop, your activities with your lure are out of sync, and you quickly catch on and stop. Stuck on my raft, I noticed, as I have many times before, that the life of Nature ebbs and flows, appears and disappears in these wild scenes; one moment her stage is filled, the next it’s completely empty. There’s a remarkable harmony between the two elements, air and water. When there’s a lot happening in one, there’s usually a lot happening in the other. You might have been casting for an hour with hardly a ripple or any sign of life around you, when suddenly the breeze picks up, and the trout start to bite, and just like that, all the performers come rushing in: ducks sweep by; loons laugh and circle above, then drop down toward the water on a long, gentle slope, plunging deeper and deeper until they either stop or turn into foam; the fish hawk screams; the bald eagle flaps by, and your eyes and hands are filled with action. Then the tide recedes, and both fish and birds are gone.

Patiently whipping the waters of the lake from my rude float, I became an object of great interest to the loons. I had never seen these birds before in their proper habitat, and the interest was mutual. When they had paused on the Hudson during their spring and fall migrations, I had pursued them in my boat to try to get near them. Now the case was reversed; I was the interloper now, and they would come out and study me. Sometimes six or eight of them would be swimming about watching my movements, but they were wary and made a wide circle. One day one of their number volunteered to make a thorough reconnoissance. I saw him leave his comrades and swim straight toward me. He came bringing first one eye to bear upon me, then the other. When about half the distance was passed over he began to waver and hesitate. To encourage him I stopped casting, and taking off my hat began to wave it slowly to and fro, as in the act of fanning myself. This started him again,—this was a new trait in the creature that he must scrutinize more closely. On he came, till all his markings were distinctly seen. With one hand I pulled a little revolver from my hip pocket, and when the loon was about fifty yards distant, and had begun to sidle around me, I fired: at the flash I saw two webbed feet twinkle in the air, and the loon was gone! Lead could not have gone down so quickly. The bullet cut across the circles where he disappeared. In a few moments he reappeared a couple of hundred yards away. “Ha-ha-ha-a-a,” said he, “ha-ha-ha-a-a,” and “ha-ha-ha-a-a,” said his comrades, who had been looking on; and “ha-ha-ha-a-a,” said we all, echo included. He approached a second time, but not so closely, and when I began to creep back toward the shore with my heavy craft, pawing the water first upon one side, then the other, he followed, and with ironical laughter witnessed my efforts to stem the current at the head of the lake. I confess it was enough to make a more solemn bird than the loon laugh, but it was no fun for me, and generally required my last pound of steam.

Patiently splashing the water of the lake off my makeshift float, I caught the attention of the loons. I had never seen these birds in their natural home before, and they seemed just as curious about me. During their spring and fall migrations, I had chased them in my boat to get closer. Now, the roles were reversed—I was the outsider, and they came out to check me out. Sometimes six or eight of them would swim around, watching my movements, but they kept their distance. One day, one of them decided to investigate. I watched as it left the group and swam straight toward me. It tilted its head to look at me with one eye, then the other. When it was halfway there, it started to hesitate. To encourage it, I stopped casting, took off my hat, and waved it slowly, as if fanning myself. This got its attention again—this was a new action for it to inspect more closely. It came closer until all its markings were clear. With one hand, I pulled a little revolver from my hip pocket, and when the loon was about fifty yards away and started to sidestep around me, I fired. At the flash, I saw two webbed feet shoot up in the air, and just like that, the loon was gone! It couldn't have sunk any faster. The bullet cut across the spot where it disappeared. Moments later, it appeared a couple of hundred yards away. “Ha-ha-ha-a-a,” it called, “ha-ha-ha-a-a,” echoed its friends, who had been watching; and “ha-ha-ha-a-a,” we all laughed, including the echo. It approached again, but not as close, and when I started to paddle back toward the shore with my heavy craft, splashing the water first on one side, then the other, it followed me, laughing ironically as it witnessed my struggle against the current at the lake's head. I admit, it was enough to make even a serious bird like the loon laugh, but it was no fun for me and typically took every bit of energy I had.

The loons flew back and forth from one lake to the other, and their voices were about the only notable wild sounds to be heard.

The loons flew back and forth between the lakes, and their calls were pretty much the only remarkable natural sounds around.

One afternoon, quite unexpectedly, I struck my big fish in the head of the lake. I was first advised of his approach by two or three trout jumping clear from the water to get out of his lordship’s way. The water was not deep just there, and he swam so near the surface that his enormous back cut through. With a swirl he swept my fly under and turned.

One afternoon, quite unexpectedly, I hooked my big fish at the head of the lake. I was first alerted to his approach by two or three trout jumping out of the water to get out of his way. The water was shallow there, and he swam so close to the surface that his enormous back broke through. With a splash, he swirled my fly under and turned.

My hook was too near home, and my rod too near a perpendicular to strike well. More than that, my presence of mind came near being unhorsed by the sudden apparition of the fish. If I could have had a moment’s notice, or if I had not seen the monster, I should have fared better and the fish worse. I struck, but not with enough decision, and, before I could reel up, my empty hook came back. The trout had carried it in his jaws till the fraud was detected, and then spat it out. He came a second time and made a grand commotion in the water, but not in my nerves, for I was ready then, but failed to take the fly, and so to get his weight and beauty in these pages. As my luck failed me at the last, I will place my loss at the full extent of the law, and claim that nothing less than a ten-pounder was spirited away from my hand that day. I might not have saved him, netless as I was upon my cumbrous raft; but I should at least have had the glory of the fight, and the consolation of the fairly vanquished.

My hook was too close to home, and my rod was almost straight up, making it hard to cast properly. Plus, my focus almost got thrown off by the sudden appearance of the fish. If I had just a moment's warning, or if I hadn't seen the creature, I would have done better and the fish worse. I swung at it, but not with enough confidence, and before I could reel in, my empty hook came back. The trout had held it in its mouth until the trick was revealed and then spat it out. It came back a second time and made quite a splash, but I wasn't nervous anymore—I was ready this time, yet still didn't hook it, missing the chance to capture its weight and beauty in these pages. Since my luck ran out in the end, I'll claim that I lost a fish weighing nothing less than ten pounds that day. I might not have been able to land it without a net on my awkward raft, but I would at least have had the thrill of the struggle and the satisfaction of having fought a worthy opponent.

These trout are not properly lake trout, but the common brook trout. The largest ones are taken with live bait through the ice in winter. The Indians and the habitans bring them out of the woods from here and from Snow Lake, on their toboggans, from two and a half to three feet long. They have kinks and ways of their own. About half a mile above camp we discovered a deep oval bay to one side of the main current of the river, that evidently abounded in big fish. Here they disported themselves. It was a favorite feeding-ground, and late every afternoon the fish rose all about it, making those big ripples the angler delights to see. A trout, when he comes to the surface, starts a ring about his own length in diameter; most of the rings in the pool, when the eye caught them, were like barrel hoops, but the haughty trout ignored all our best efforts; not one rise did we get. We were told of this pool on our return to Quebec, and that other anglers had a similar experience there. But occasionally some old fisherman, like a great advocate who loves a difficult case, would set his wits to work and bring into camp an enormous trout taken there.

These fish aren't true lake trout; they're the common brook trout. The biggest ones are caught with live bait under the ice during winter. The Native Americans and the habitans bring them out of the woods from here and Snow Lake on their toboggans, measuring between two and a half to three feet long. They have their own quirks and behaviors. About half a mile above camp, we found a deep oval bay off to one side of the main current of the river, which clearly had plenty of big fish. They were swimming around happily. It was a favorite feeding spot, and late every afternoon, the fish would rise all around it, creating those large ripples that thrill anglers. When a trout comes to the surface, it creates a ring about its own length in diameter; most of the rings in the pool, when we noticed them, were like barrel hoops, but the proud trout ignored all our best attempts; we didn't get a single rise. We heard about this pool on our way back to Quebec, and other anglers had a similar experience there. But now and then, an old fisherman, like a great lawyer who loves a tough case, would use his skills and bring back a massive trout caught there.

I had been told in Quebec that I would not see a bird in the woods, not a feather of any kind. But I knew I should, though they were not numerous. I saw and heard a bird nearly every day, on the tops of the trees about, that I think was one of the crossbills. The kingfisher was there ahead of us with his loud clicking reel. The osprey was there, too, and I saw him abusing the bald eagle, who had probably just robbed him of a fish. The yellow-rumped warbler I saw, and one of the kinglets was leading its lisping brood about through the spruces. In every opening the white-throated sparrow abounded, striking up his clear sweet whistle, at times so loud and sudden that one’s momentary impression was that some farm boy was approaching, or was secreted there behind the logs. Many times, amid those primitive solitudes, I was quite startled by the human tone and quality of this whistle. It is little more than a beginning; the bird never seems to finish the strain suggested. The Canada jay was there also, very busy about some important private matter.

I had been told in Quebec that I wouldn't see a single bird in the woods, not even a feather. But I knew I would, even if they weren't many. I saw and heard a bird almost every day, perched on top of the trees, which I think was one of the crossbills. The kingfisher was there ahead of us with his loud clicking sounds. The osprey was there too, and I saw him chasing off the bald eagle, who probably just stole a fish from him. I saw the yellow-rumped warbler, and one of the kinglets was leading its chattering chicks through the spruces. In every clearing, the white-throated sparrow was everywhere, breaking into his clear, sweet whistle, sometimes so loud and sudden that it felt like a farm boy was walking up or hiding behind the logs. Many times, in those wild, empty spaces, I was startled by the human quality of that whistle. It's just a tease; the bird never seems to complete the tune. The Canada jay was also around, busy with some important private matter.

One lowery morning, as I was standing in camp, I saw a lot of ducks borne swiftly down by the current around the bend in the river a few rods above. They saw me at the same instant and turned toward the shore. On hastening up there, I found the old bird rapidly leading her nearly grown brood through the woods, as if to go around our camp. As I pursued them they ran squawking with outstretched stubby wings, scattering right and left, and seeking a hiding-place under the logs and débris. I captured one and carried it into camp. It was just what Joe wanted; it would make a valuable decoy. So he kept it in a box, fed it upon oats, and took it out of the woods with him.

One gloomy morning, as I stood in camp, I saw a bunch of ducks being carried quickly downstream around the bend in the river a short distance away. They spotted me at the same moment and turned towards the shore. When I hurried over there, I found the mother duck quickly leading her almost grown-up ducklings through the woods, trying to go around our camp. As I chased them, they squawked and flapped their short wings, scattering in all directions and looking for a hiding spot under the logs and debris. I caught one and brought it back to camp. It was exactly what Joe needed; it would make a great decoy. So he kept it in a box, fed it oats, and took it out of the woods with him.

We found the camp we had appropriated was a favorite stopping-place of the carmen who hauled in supplies for the gang of two hundred road-builders. One rainy day near nightfall no less than eight carts drew up at the old stable, and the rain-soaked drivers, after picketing and feeding their horses, came down to our fire. We were away, and Joe met us on our return with the unwelcome news. We kept open house so far as the fire was concerned; but our roof was a narrow one at the best, and one or two leaky spots made it still narrower.

We found that the campsite we had taken over was a popular rest stop for the teamsters who brought supplies for the group of two hundred road workers. On a rainy day close to dusk, no less than eight carts pulled up to the old stable, and the drenched drivers, after tying up and feeding their horses, came over to our fire. We were away at the time, and Joe greeted us on our return with the unwelcome news. We kept the fire going for everyone, but our shelter was small to begin with, and a couple of leaks made it even smaller.

“We shall probably sleep out-of-doors to-night,” said my companion, “unless we are a match for this posse of rough teamsters.”

“We’ll probably sleep outside tonight,” said my companion, “unless we can handle this group of rough truck drivers.”

But the men proved to be much more peaceably disposed than the same class at home; they apologized for intruding, pleading the inclemency of the weather, and were quite willing, with our permission, to take up with pot-luck about the fire and leave us the shanty. They dried their clothes upon poles and logs, and had their fun and their bantering amid it all. An Irishman among them did about the only growling; he invited himself into our quarters, and before morning had Joe’s blanket about him in addition to his own.

But the guys turned out to be a lot more easygoing than those of the same group back home; they apologized for barging in, explaining the bad weather, and were totally fine, with our OK, to settle for whatever we had around the fire and leave us the cabin. They dried their clothes on poles and logs, and had their fun and teasing throughout it all. An Irishman in the group did most of the complaining; he helped himself to our space, and by morning, he had wrapped himself in Joe’s blanket along with his own.

On Friday we made an excursion to Great Lake Jacques Cartier, paddling and poling up the river in the rude box-boat. It was a bright, still morning after the rain, and everything had a new, fresh appearance. Expectation was ever on tiptoe as each turn in the river opened a new prospect before us. How wild, and shaggy, and silent it was! What fascinating pools, what tempting stretches of trout-haunted water! Now and then we would catch a glimpse of long black shadows starting away from the boat and shooting through the sunlit depths. But no sound or motion on shore was heard or seen. Near the lake we came to a long, shallow rapid, when we pulled off our shoes and stockings, and, with our trousers rolled above our knees, towed the boat up it, wincing and cringing amid the sharp, slippery stones. With benumbed feet and legs we reached the still water that forms the stem of the lake, and presently saw the arms of the wilderness open and the long deep blue expanse in their embrace. We rested and bathed, and gladdened our eyes with the singularly beautiful prospect. The shadows of summer clouds were slowly creeping up and down the sides of the mountains that hemmed it in. On the far eastern shore, near the head, banks of what was doubtless white sand shone dimly in the sun, and the illusion that there was a town nestled there haunted my mind constantly. It was like a section of the Hudson below the Highlands, except that these waters were bluer and colder, and these shores darker, than even those Sir Hendrik first looked upon; but surely, one felt, a steamer will round that point presently, or a sail drift into view! We paddled a mile or more up the east shore, then across to the west, and found such pleasure in simply gazing upon the scene that our rods were quite neglected. We did some casting after a while, but raised no fish of any consequence till we were in the outlet again, when they responded so freely that the “disgust of trout” was soon upon us.

On Friday, we took a trip to Great Lake Jacques Cartier, paddling and poling up the river in our rough box-boat. It was a bright, calm morning after the rain, and everything looked fresh and new. Our excitement grew with each bend in the river that revealed a new view. It was wild, overgrown, and silent! We saw captivating pools and tempting stretches of water filled with trout! Occasionally, we would catch sight of long black shadows darting away from the boat and gliding through the sunlit depths. But there was no sound or movement on the shore. As we neared the lake, we came to a long, shallow rapid, so we took off our shoes and socks, rolled our trousers up to our knees, and pulled the boat through it, wincing at the sharp, slippery stones. With cold feet and legs, we finally reached the calm water at the head of the lake and soon saw the wilderness opening up to us, framing the long deep blue expanse. We rested and bathed, filling our eyes with the uniquely beautiful view. Shadows from summer clouds slowly moved up and down the mountains surrounding us. On the far eastern shore near the head, banks of what looked like white sand glimmered in the sunlight, creating a persistent illusion in my mind that there was a town tucked away there. It reminded me of a part of the Hudson below the Highlands, but these waters were bluer and colder, and the shores darker than those that Sir Hendrik first encountered; yet, you could almost feel that a steamboat would soon come around that point or a sailboat would appear! We paddled a mile or more along the east shore, then crossed over to the west, and enjoyed just taking in the scenery so much that we completely forgot about our fishing rods. After a while, we tried casting but didn’t catch anything significant until we reached the outlet again, where the fish were so abundant that we quickly grew tired of catching trout.

At the rapids, on our return, as I was standing to my knees in the swift, cold current, and casting into a deep hole behind a huge boulder that rose four or five feet above the water amidstream, two trout, one of them a large one, took my flies, and, finding the fish and the current united too strong for my tackle, I sought to gain the top of the boulder, in which attempt I got wet to my middle and lost my fish. After I had gained the rock, I could not get away again with my clothes on without swimming, which, to say nothing of wet garments the rest of the way home, I did not like to do amid those rocks and swift currents; so, after a vain attempt to communicate with my companion above the roar of the water, I removed my clothing, left it together with my tackle upon the rock, and by a strong effort stemmed the current and reached the shore. The boat was a hundred yards above, and when I arrived there my teeth were chattering with the cold, my feet were numb with bruises, and the black flies were making the blood stream down my back. We hastened back with the boat, and, by wading out into the current again and holding it by a long rope, it swung around with my companion aboard, and was held in the eddy behind the rock. I clambered up, got my clothes on, and we were soon shooting downstream toward home; but the winter of discontent that shrouded one half of me made sad inroads upon the placid feeling of a day well spent that enveloped the other, all the way to camp.

At the rapids, on our way back, I was standing knee-deep in the fast, icy water, casting into a deep spot behind a massive boulder that stood four or five feet above the current. Two trout took my flies, and realizing that the combined strength of the fish and the current was too much for my gear, I tried to climb onto the boulder. In the process, I got soaked up to my waist and lost my fish. Once I made it to the rock, I realized I couldn't get back across without swimming, which I didn't want to do with wet clothes on, especially among those rocks and fast currents. After a failed attempt to shout to my friend above the sound of the rushing water, I took off my clothes, left them and my fishing gear on the rock, and with a strong effort, fought the current to reach the shore. The boat was a hundred yards away, and by the time I got there, I was shivering from the cold, my feet were sore and numb, and the black flies were making my back bleed. We quickly returned with the boat, and by wading into the current again and holding it with a long rope, it swung around with my friend on board and got caught in the eddy behind the rock. I climbed up, put my clothes back on, and soon we were racing downstream toward home; but the chill that gripped one part of me dampened the happy feeling from a day well spent that surrounded the other part all the way back to camp.

That night something carried off all our fish,—doubtless a fisher or lynx, as Joe had seen an animal of some kind about camp that day.

That night, something took all our fish—probably a fisher or lynx, since Joe had spotted some kind of animal near the camp that day.

I must not forget the two red squirrels that frequented the camp during our stay, and that were so tame they would approach within a few feet of us and take the pieces of bread or fish tossed to them. When a particularly fine piece of hard-tack was secured, they would spin off to their den with it somewhere near by.

I can't forget the two red squirrels that hung around the camp while we were there. They were so friendly they would come within a few feet of us and grab the bits of bread or fish we tossed to them. When they managed to get a nice piece of hardtack, they would scurry off to their den, which was somewhere close by.

Caribou abound in these woods, but we saw only their tracks; and of bears, which are said to be plentiful, we saw no signs.

Caribou are plentiful in these woods, but we only saw their tracks; and as for bears, which are said to be common, we didn’t see any signs of them.

Saturday morning we packed up our traps and started on our return, and found that the other side of the spruce-trees and the vista of the lonely road going south were about the same as coming north. But we understood the road better and the buck-board better, and our load was lighter, hence the distance was more easily accomplished.

Saturday morning we packed up our traps and started our way back, noticing that the other side of the spruce trees and the view of the lonely road going south looked pretty much the same as when we were heading north. But we understood the road and the buckboard better now, and our load was lighter, so the distance felt easier to cover.

I saw a solitary robin by the roadside, and wondered what could have brought this social and half-domesticated bird so far into these wilds. In La Grande Brûlure, a hermit thrush perched upon a dry tree in a swampy place and sang most divinely. We paused to listen to his clear, silvery strain poured out without stint upon that unlistening solitude. I was half persuaded I had heard him before on first entering the woods.

I saw a lone robin by the side of the road and wondered what could have brought this social and somewhat domesticated bird so deep into the wilderness. In La Grande Brûlure, a hermit thrush sat on a dry tree in a marshy area and sang beautifully. We stopped to listen to his clear, silvery song flowing freely into that silent solitude. I was almost convinced I had heard him before when I first entered the woods.

We nooned again at No Man’s Inn on the banks of a trout lake, and fared well and had no reckoning to pay. Late in the afternoon we saw a lonely pedestrian laboring up a hill far ahead of us. When he heard us coming he leaned his back against the bank, and was lighting his pipe as we passed. He was an old man, an Irishman, and looked tired. He had come from the farther end of the road, fifty miles distant, and had thirty yet before him to reach town. He looked the dismay he evidently felt when, in answer to his inquiry, we told him it was yet ten miles to the first house, La Chance’s. But there was a roof nearer than that, where he doubtless passed the night, for he did not claim hospitality at the cabin of La Chance. We arrived there betimes, but found the “spare bed” assigned to other guests; so we were comfortably lodged upon the haymow. One of the boys lighted us up with a candle and made level places for us upon the hay.

We had lunch again at No Man’s Inn by a trout lake, and the food was great with no bill to pay. Later in the afternoon, we spotted a solitary traveler struggling up a hill far ahead. When he heard us coming, he leaned against the bank and was lighting his pipe as we walked by. He was an older man, an Irishman, and looked exhausted. He had come from the far end of the road, fifty miles away, and still had thirty miles to go to reach town. He showed clear disappointment when we told him it was another ten miles to the first house, La Chance’s. But there was a place to stay closer than that, where he likely spent the night, since he didn't ask for lodging at La Chance's cabin. We arrived there early but found that the “spare bed” was already taken by other guests, so we ended up cozying up in the haymow. One of the boys lit a candle for us and made flat spots for us on the hay.

La Chance was one of the game wardens, or constables appointed by the government to see the game laws enforced. Joe had not felt entirely at his ease about the duck he was surreptitiously taking to town, and when, by its “quack, quack,” it called upon La Chance for protection, he responded at once. Joe was obliged to liberate it then and there, and to hear the law read and expounded, and be threatened till he turned pale beside. It was evident that they follow the home government in the absurd practice of enforcing their laws in Canada. La Chance said he was under oath not to wink at or permit any violation of the law, and seemed to think that made a difference.

La Chance was one of the game wardens, or constables appointed by the government to enforce the game laws. Joe hadn’t felt entirely comfortable about the duck he was sneakily taking to town, and when it quacked for La Chance's help, he responded immediately. Joe had to set the duck free right then and there, listen to the law being explained, and endure threats until he turned pale. It was clear that they followed the home government's silly practice of enforcing their laws in Canada. La Chance insisted he was sworn not to ignore or allow any violations of the law, and he seemed to think that made a difference.

We were off early in the morning, and before we had gone two miles met a party from Quebec who—must have been driving nearly all night to give the black flies an early breakfast. Before long a slow rain set in; we saw another party who had taken refuge in a house in a grove. When the rain had become so brisk that we began to think of seeking shelter ourselves, we passed a party of young men and boys—sixteen of them—in a cart turning back to town, water-soaked and heavy (for the poor horse had all it could pull), but merry and good-natured. We paused awhile at the farmhouse where we had got our hay on going out, were treated to a drink of milk and some wild red cherries, and when the rain slackened drove on, and by ten o’clock saw the city eight miles distant, with the sun shining upon its steep tinned roofs.

We set off early in the morning, and before we had traveled two miles, we ran into a group from Quebec who must have been driving almost all night just to escape the black flies. Soon, a steady rain started, and we saw another group taking shelter in a house in a grove. When the rain picked up enough that we thought about finding our own shelter, we passed a group of young men and boys—sixteen of them—in a cart heading back to town, soaked and weighed down (because the poor horse was struggling to pull the load), but they were cheerful and in good spirits. We stopped for a bit at the farmhouse where we had picked up hay on our way out, and they kindly gave us some milk and wild red cherries. When the rain eased up, we continued on, and by ten o’clock, we spotted the city eight miles away, with the sun shining on its steep tin roofs.

The next morning we set out by steamer for the Saguenay, and entered upon the second phase of our travels, but with less relish than we could have wished. Scenery hunting is the least satisfying pursuit I have ever engaged in. What one sees in his necessary travels, or doing his work, or going a-fishing, seems worth while, but the famous view you go out in cold blood to admire is quite apt to elude you. Nature loves to enter a door another hand has opened; a mountain view, or a waterfall, I have noticed, never looks better than when one has just been warmed up by the capture of a big trout. If we had been bound for some salmon stream up the Saguenay, we should perhaps have possessed that generous and receptive frame of mind-that open house of the heart—which makes one “eligible to any good fortune,” and the grand scenery would have come in as fit sauce to the salmon. An adventure, a bit of experience of some kind, is what one wants when he goes forth to admire woods and waters,—something to create a draught and make the embers of thought and feeling brighten. Nature, like certain wary game, is best taken by seeming to pass by her intent on other matters.

The next morning we set out by steamer for the Saguenay and entered the second phase of our travels, but with less enthusiasm than we had hoped for. Scenery hunting is the least satisfying pursuit I've ever engaged in. What you see during necessary travel, while working, or going fishing seems worthwhile, but the famous view you set out to admire often manages to evade you. Nature seems to prefer entering through a door that someone else has opened; I've noticed that a mountain view or a waterfall never looks better than right after you've caught a big trout. If we had been headed for a salmon stream up the Saguenay, we might have had that generous and open mindset—which makes one "eligible for any good fortune"—and the grand scenery would have complemented the salmon perfectly. An adventure or some sort of experience is what you want when you go out to admire the woods and waters—something to stir up thoughts and feelings. Nature, like certain elusive game, is best approached by pretending to be focused on other things.

But without any such errand, or occupation, or indirection, we managed to extract considerable satisfaction from the view of the lower St. Lawrence and the Saguenay.

But without any specific task, job, or diversion, we managed to find a lot of enjoyment in the view of the lower St. Lawrence and the Saguenay.

We had not paid the customary visit to the falls of the Montmorenci, but we shall see them after all, for before we are a league from Quebec they come into view on the left. A dark glen or chasm there at the end of the Beauport Slopes seems suddenly to have put on a long white apron. By intently gazing, one can see the motion and falling of the water, though it is six or seven miles away. There is no sign of the river above or below but this trembling white curtain of foam and spray.

We hadn't made the usual trip to the Montmorenci Falls, but we'll see them after all, because before we get a mile away from Quebec, they appear on the left. A dark gorge at the end of the Beauport Slopes suddenly looks like it has put on a long white apron. If you look closely, you can see the movement and flow of the water, even though it’s six or seven miles away. There’s no sign of the river above or below, just this shimmering white curtain of foam and spray.

It was very sultry when we left Quebec, but about noon we struck much clearer and cooler air, and soon after ran into an immense wave or puff of fog that came drifting up the river and set all the fog-guns booming along shore. We were soon through it into clear, crisp space, with room enough for any eye to range in. On the south the shores of the great river appear low and uninteresting, but on the north they are bold and striking enough to make it up,—high, scarred, unpeopled mountain ranges the whole way. The points of interest to the eye in the broad expanse of water were the white porpoises that kept rolling, rolling in the distance, all day. They came up like the perimeter of a great wheel that turns slowly and then disappears. From mid-forenoon we could see far ahead an immense column of yellow smoke rising up and flattening out upon the sky and stretching away beyond the horizon. Its form was that of some aquatic plant that shoots a stem up through the water, and spreads its broad leaf upon the surface. This smoky lily-pad must have reached nearly to Maine. It proved to be in the Indian country in the mountains beyond the mouth of the Saguenay, and must have represented an immense destruction of forest timber.

It was really humid when we left Quebec, but around noon we hit much clearer and cooler air, and soon after ran into a huge wave of fog that floated up the river, causing all the foghorns along the shore to start booming. We quickly passed through it into clear, crisp space, with plenty of room for anyone to gaze around. On the south side, the riverbanks look low and uninteresting, but on the north, they are bold and striking enough to make up for it—high, rugged, uninhabited mountain ranges all the way. The highlights in the wide expanse of water were the white porpoises that kept rolling in the distance all day. They popped up like the edge of a giant wheel that turns slowly and then vanishes. From mid-morning, we could see far ahead a massive column of yellow smoke rising up and spreading out in the sky, stretching beyond the horizon. It looked like some aquatic plant that sends a stem up through the water and fans its broad leaf on the surface. This smoky lily pad must have reached almost to Maine. It turned out to be in the Indian territory in the mountains beyond the mouth of the Saguenay, likely representing a massive destruction of forest timber.

The steamer is two hours crossing the St. Lawrence from RiviĂšre du Loup to Tadousac. The Saguenay pushes a broad sweep of dark blue water down into its mightier brother that is sharply defined from the deck of the steamer. The two rivers seem to touch, but not to blend, so proud and haughty is this chieftain from the north. On the mountains above Tadousac one could see banks of sand left by the ancient seas. Naked rock and sterile sand are all the Tadousacker has to make his garden of, so far as I observed. Indeed, there is no soil along the Saguenay until you get to Ha-ha Bay, and then there is not much, and poor quality at that.

The steamer takes two hours to cross the St. Lawrence from RiviĂšre du Loup to Tadousac. The Saguenay pushes a wide stretch of dark blue water into its larger counterpart, clearly visible from the deck of the steamer. The two rivers appear to meet but don't mix, so proud and arrogant is this northern chieftain. On the mountains above Tadousac, you can see sand banks left by ancient seas. All the locals have to work with for their gardens, as far as I noticed, is bare rock and lifeless sand. In fact, there's no real soil along the Saguenay until you reach Ha-ha Bay, and even then, it's not much and of poor quality.

What the ancient fires did not burn the ancient seas have washed away. I overheard an English resident say to a Yankee tourist, “You will think you are approaching the end of the world up here.” It certainly did suggest something apocryphal or antemundane,—a segment of the moon or of a cleft asteroid, matter dead or wrecked. The world-builders must have had their foundry up in this neighborhood, and the bed of this river was doubtless the channel through which the molten granite flowed. Some mischief-loving god has let in the sea while things were yet red-hot, and there has been a time here. But the channel still seems filled with water from the mid-Atlantic, cold and blue-black, and in places between seven and eight thousand feet deep (one and a half miles). In fact, the enormous depth of the Saguenay is one of the wonders of physical geography. It is as great a marvel in its way as Niagara.

What the ancient fires didn't burn, the ancient seas have washed away. I overheard an English resident telling a Yankee tourist, “You’ll think you’re approaching the end of the world up here.” It definitely felt like something otherworldly or unreal—a piece of the moon or a broken asteroid, matter that’s lifeless or ruined. The creators of this world must have had their workshop nearby, and the riverbed was likely the route where molten granite flowed. Some mischief-making god must have let the sea in while everything was still red-hot, and there’s been a history here. But the channel still looks filled with water from the mid-Atlantic, cold and deep blue-black, and in some spots, it’s between seven and eight thousand feet deep (one and a half miles). In fact, the massive depth of the Saguenay is one of the wonders of physical geography. It’s as impressive in its own way as Niagara.

The ascent of the river is made by night, and the traveler finds himself in Ha-ha Bay in the morning. The steamer lies here several hours before starting on her return trip, and takes in large quantities of white birch wood, as she does also at Tadousac. The chief product of the country seemed to be huckleberries, of which large quantities are shipped to Quebec in rude board boxes holding about a peck each. Little girls came aboard or lingered about the landing with cornucopias of birch-bark filled with red raspberries; five cents for about half a pint was the usual price. The village of St. Alphonse, where the steamer tarries, is a cluster of small, humble dwellings dominated, like all Canadian villages, by an immense church. Usually the church will hold all the houses in the village; pile them all up and they would hardly equal it in size; it is the one conspicuous object, and is seen afar; and on the various lines of travel one sees many more priests than laymen. They appear to be about the only class that stir about and have a good time. Many of the houses were covered with birch-bark,—the canoe birch,—held to its place by perpendicular strips of board or split poles.

The journey up the river happens at night, and the traveler arrives at Ha-ha Bay by morning. The steamboat stays here for several hours before heading back, taking on large amounts of white birch wood, just like it does at Tadousac. The main product of the area seems to be huckleberries, with large quantities shipped to Quebec in rough wooden boxes that hold about a peck each. Little girls came on board or hung around the landing with birch-bark cones filled with red raspberries; the usual price was five cents for about half a pint. The village of St. Alphonse, where the steamboat stops, is made up of small, modest homes, all overshadowed, like in most Canadian villages, by a huge church. Typically, the church could fit all the houses in the village combined; it’s the one standout feature and can be seen from a distance; on the many routes of travel, there are usually more priests than laypeople. They seem to be the only group that moves around and enjoys themselves. Many of the houses were covered with birch-bark—the canoe birch—held in place by vertical strips of wood or split poles.

A man with a horse and a buckboard persuaded us to give him twenty-five cents each to take us two miles up the St. Alphonse River to see the salmon jump. There is a high saw-mill dam there which every salmon in his upward journey tries his hand at leaping. A raceway has been constructed around the dam for their benefit, which it seems they do not use till they have repeatedly tried to scale the dam. The day before our visit three dead fish were found in the pool below, killed by too much jumping. Those we saw had the jump about all taken out of them; several did not get more than half their length out of the water, and occasionally only an impotent nose would protrude from the foam. One fish made a leap of three or four feet and landed on an apron of the dam and tumbled helplessly back; he shot up like a bird and rolled back like a clod. This was the only view of salmon, the buck of the rivers, we had on our journey.

A man with a horse and a buckboard convinced us to pay him twenty-five cents each to take us two miles up the St. Alphonse River to watch the salmon jump. There’s a tall sawmill dam there that every salmon tries to leap over on their way upstream. A raceway has been built around the dam for their benefit, but it seems they don’t use it until they’ve repeatedly tried to jump the dam. The day before our visit, three dead fish were found in the pool below, killed from jumping too much. The ones we saw looked pretty worn out; several didn’t get more than half their body out of the water, and sometimes only their noses poked out from the foam. One fish managed to jump three or four feet and landed on the edge of the dam, only to tumble helplessly back down; he shot up like a bird and rolled back down like a rock. This was the only glimpse of salmon, the kings of the rivers, we had on our journey.

It was a bright and flawless midsummer day that we sailed down the Saguenay, and nothing was wanting but a good excuse for being there. The river was as lonely as the St. John’s road; not a sail or a smokestack the whole sixty-five miles. The scenery culminates at Cape Trinity, where the rocks rise sheer from the water to a height of eighteen hundred feet. This view dwarfed anything I had ever before seen. There is perhaps nothing this side the Yosemite chasm that equals it, and, emptied of its water, this chasm would far surpass that famous cañon, as the river here is a mile and a quarter deep. The bald eagle nests in the niches in the precipice secure from any intrusion. Immense blocks of the rock had fallen out, leaving areas of shadow and clinging overhanging masses that were a terror and fascination to the eye. There was a great fall a few years ago, just as the steamer had passed from under and blown her whistle to awake the echoes. The echo came back, and with it a part of the mountain that astonished more than it delighted the lookers-on. The pilot took us close around the base of the precipice that we might fully inspect it. And here my eyes played me a trick the like of which they had never done before. One of the boys of the steamer brought to the forward deck his hands full of stones, that the curious ones among the passengers might try how easy it was to throw one ashore. “Any girl ought to do it,” I said to myself, after a man had tried and had failed to clear half the distance. Seizing a stone, I cast it with vigor and confidence, and as much expected to see it smite the rock as I expected to live. “It is a good while getting there,” I mused, as I watched its course: down, down it went; there, it will ring upon the granite in half a breath; no, down—into the water, a little more than halfway! “Has my arm lost its cunning?” I said, and tried again and again, but with like result. The eye was completely at fault. There was a new standard of size before it to which it failed to adjust itself. The rock is so enormous and towers so above you that you get the impression it is much nearer than it actually is. When the eye is full it says, “Here we are,” and the hand is ready to prove the fact; but in this case there is an astonishing discrepancy between what the eye reports and what the hand finds out.

It was a bright and perfect midsummer day when we sailed down the Saguenay, and all we needed was a good reason for being there. The river felt as isolated as the St. John’s road; not a sail or a smokestack in sight for the entire sixty-five miles. The scenery peaks at Cape Trinity, where the cliffs rise straight up from the water to eighteen hundred feet. This view made everything I had seen before look small. Nothing east of the Yosemite chasm compares; if this chasm were dry, it would easily surpass that famous canyon since the river here is a mile and a quarter deep. The bald eagle nests in the ledges of the cliffs, safe from any disturbance. Huge chunks of rock had fallen away, creating patches of shadow and hanging masses that were both terrifying and fascinating to behold. A massive rockfall occurred a few years back, just as the steamboat had passed underneath and sounded its whistle to stir the echoes. The echo returned, along with a part of the mountain that surprised more than it pleased the onlookers. The pilot took us close to the base of the cliff so we could fully appreciate it. And here my eyes played a trick on me like never before. One of the boys from the steamboat brought a handful of stones to the front deck so that the curious passengers could see how easy it was to throw one ashore. “Any girl should be able to do it,” I thought to myself after a man tried and failed to clear half the distance. Grabbing a stone, I threw it with energy and confidence, fully expecting to see it hit the rock. “It’s taking a while to get there,” I thought as I watched it fly: down, down it went; it would surely hit the granite in a heartbeat; no, down—into the water, a little more than halfway! “Has my arm lost its skill?” I wondered, and tried again and again, but got the same result. My eyes were completely deceived. They were dealing with a new sense of scale that they couldn’t adjust to. The rock is so massive and looms so high above you that you get the impression it’s much closer than it really is. When your eyes are filled with the sight, they say, “Here we are,” and your hand is ready to prove it; but in this case, there’s a shocking gap between what the eyes see and what the hand discovers.

Cape Eternity, the wife of this colossus, stands across a chasm through which flows a small tributary of the Saguenay, and is a head or two shorter, as becomes a wife, and less rugged and broken in outline.

Cape Eternity, the wife of this giant, stands across a gap through which flows a small stream of the Saguenay, and is a head or two shorter, as suits a wife, and less rugged and jagged in shape.

From Riviùre du Loup, where we passed the night and ate our first “Tommy-cods,” our thread of travel makes a big loop around New Brunswick to St. John, thence out and down through Maine to Boston,—a thread upon which many delightful excursions and reminiscences might be strung. We traversed the whole of the valley of the Metapedia, and passed the doors of many famous salmon streams and rivers, and heard everywhere the talk they inspire; one could not take a nap in the car for the excitement of the big fish stories he was obliged to overhear.

From Riviùre du Loup, where we spent the night and tried our first "Tommy-cods," our travel route makes a big loop around New Brunswick to St. John, then out and down through Maine to Boston—a thread on which many enjoyable trips and memories could be strung together. We traveled the entire valley of the Metapedia, passed by the entrances to many famous salmon streams and rivers, and everywhere we heard conversations about the fishing; you couldn't even take a nap in the car because of the excitement from the big fish stories you couldn't help but listen to.

The Metapedia is a most enticing-looking stream; its waters are as colorless as melted snow; I could easily have seen the salmon in it as we shot along, if they had come out from their hiding-places. It was the first white-water stream we had seen since leaving the Catskills; for all the Canadian streams are black or brown, either from the iron in the soil or from the leechings of the spruce swamps. But in New Brunswick we saw only these clear, silver-shod streams; I imagined they had a different ring or tone also. The Metapedia is deficient in good pools in its lower portions; its limpid waters flowing with a tranquil murmur over its wide, evenly paved bed for miles at a stretch. The salmon pass over these shallows by night and rest in the pools by day. The Restigouche, which it joins, and which is a famous salmon stream and the father of famous salmon streams, is of the same complexion and a delight to look upon. There is a noted pool where the two join, and one can sit upon the railroad bridge and count the noble fish in the lucid depths below. The valley here is fertile, and has a cultivated, well-kept look.

The Metapedia is a really appealing river; its waters are as clear as melted snow; I could easily see the salmon in it as we passed by, if they had come out from their hiding spots. It was the first white-water stream we had seen since leaving the Catskills; all the Canadian rivers are black or brown, either from the iron in the soil or from the runoff of the spruce swamps. But in New Brunswick, we only saw these clear, silver-tinted streams; I imagined they had a different sound or feel as well. The Metapedia lacks good pools in its lower sections; its clear waters flow with a gentle murmur over its wide, flat bed for miles at a time. The salmon pass over these shallow areas at night and rest in the pools during the day. The Restigouche, which it joins and which is a well-known salmon river and the source of many famous salmon rivers, has the same look and is a pleasure to see. There's a well-known pool where the two rivers meet, and you can sit on the railroad bridge and count the impressive fish in the clear depths below. The valley here is fertile and has a cultivated, well-maintained appearance.

We passed the Jacquet, the Belledune, the Nepissisquit, the Miramichi (“happy retreat”) in the night, and have only their bird-call names to report.

We passed the Jacquet, the Belledune, the Nepissisquit, the Miramichi (“happy retreat”) at night, and all we have to share are their bird-like names.

INDEX

Anemone.

Anemone.

Angler, a born; eagerness of the.

Angler, a natural; excitement of the.

Arbutus.

Arbutus tree.

Asters.

Asters flowers.

Audubon, John James.

John James Audubon.

Aurora borealis, an.

Aurora borealis, a.

Balsam Lake.

Balsam Lake.

Barrington, Daines, his table of English song-birds.

Barrington, Daines, his collection of English songbirds.

Basswood, or linden.

Basswood or linden.

Bear, black.

Black bear.

Beaverkill, the; trouting on.

Beaverkill: fishing for trout.

Bee. See Bumblebee and Honeybee.

Bee. See Bumblebee and Honeybee.

Berries.

Berries.

Berrying.

Berry picking.

Big Ingin River.

Big Indian River.

Birch, yellow.

Yellow birch.

Birds, eyes of; imperfect singers among; human significance of; songs of English; relative pugnaciousness of English and American; species common to Europe and America; small and large editions of various species of; their ingenuity in the concealment of their nests.

Birds, their eyes; not the best singers among; human importance of; their songs in English; the aggressive nature of English and American; species found in both Europe and America; small and large versions of different species; their cleverness in hiding their nests.

Birds of prey.

Raptors.

Biscuit Brook.

Biscuit Brook.

Blackbird, European; notes of.

European blackbird; notes of.

Blackbird, red-winged. See Starling, red-shouldered.

Red-winged blackbird. See red-shouldered starling.

Bloodroot.

Bloodroot.

Bluebird (Sialia sialis), struggling with a cicada; courting; cares of housekeeping; and screech owl; notes of; nest of.

Bluebird (Sialia sialis), dealing with a cicada; dating; responsibilities of homekeeping; and screech owl; sounds of; nest of.

Blunder-heads.

Mistakes.

Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus); song of.

Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus); its song.

Boy.

Kid.

Brooks. See Trout streams.

Brooks. See trout streams.

Buckwheat.

Buckwheat.

Bumble-bee.

Bumblebee.

Bunting, European, notes of.

European bunting notes.

Bunting, indigo. See Indigo-bird.

Bunting, indigo. See Indigo Bird.

Bunting, snow, or snowflake (Passerina nivalis).

Bunting, snow, or snowflake (Passerina nivalis).

Butcher-bird, or northern shrike (Lanius borealis); appearance and habits of; notes of. See Shrike.

Butcher-bird, or northern shrike (Lanius borealis); its appearance and behavior; notes on it. See Shrike.

Buttercup.

Buttercup.

Camp, a thunder-storm in; in the rain; books in.

Camp, a thunderstorm in; in the rain; books in.

Camp-fire, the.

Campfire.

Camping, by trout stream and lake; in a log stable; pleasures and discomforts of; in the Catskills; thoughts of the camper; in Canada.

Camping by the trout stream and lake; in a log cabin; the joys and challenges of; in the Catskills; the camper's thoughts; in Canada.

Canada, an excursion in; dwelling-houses in; churches in.

Canada, a trip through; homes in; churches in.

Cape Eternity.

Cape Eternity.

Cape Trinity.

Trinity Cape.

Caribou.

Caribou.

Catbird (Galeoscoptes carolinensis), song of.

Catbird (Galeoscoptes carolinensis), its song.

Catfish and snake.

Catfish and rattlesnake.

Catnip.

Catnip.

Catskill Mountains, camping in.

Camping in the Catskill Mountains.

Cattle, in Canada.

Cattle in Canada.

Cedar-bird, or cedar waxwing (Ampelis cedrorum), a small edition of the Bohemian waxwing; plumage of; notes of.

Cedar-bird, or cedar waxwing (Ampelis cedrorum), a smaller version of the Bohemian waxwing; its feathers are; sounds of.

Chickadee (Parus atricapillus); notes of.

Chickadee (Parus atricapillus); sounds of.

Chipmunk, frightened by a shrike; stealing strawberries; playing tag; never more than one jump from home.

Chipmunk, scared of a shrike; taking strawberries; playing tag; always just one jump away from home.

Clouds, natural history of; rain-clouds and wind-clouds.

Clouds, natural history of; rain clouds and wind clouds.

Clover, red.

Red clover.

Clover, white.

White clover.

Coon. See Raccoon.

Raccoon.

Corn, Indian.

Indian Corn.

Corydalis.

Corydalis.

Crossbills.

Crossbills.

Crow, American (Corvus brachyrhynchos); notes of.

Crow, American (Corvus brachyrhynchos); notes of.

Crow, fish (Corvus ossifragus), a sneak thief.

Crow, fish (Corvus ossifragus), a sneaky thief.

Cuckoo (Coccyzus sp.), parents, eggs, and young; breeding habits of; appearance and habits of; notes of; nest of.

Cuckoo (Coccyzus sp.), parents, eggs, and chicks; breeding behavior of; appearance and habits of; observations of; nest of.

Cuckoo, European; in literature; notes of.

Cuckoo, European; in literature; notes of.

Daisy, ox-eye.

Daisy, daisy flower.

Dandelion.

Dandelion.

Deer, Virginia.

Deer, VA.

Delaware River.

Delaware River.

Dove, mourning (Zenaidura macroura).

Mourning dove (Zenaidura macroura).

Drought.

Drought conditions.

Ducks, wild, voices of.

Wild duck calls.

Eagle, bald (Haliaëtus leucocephalus); nest of.

Eagle, bald (Haliaëtus leucocephalus); nest of.

Esopus Creek.

Esopus Creek.

Eyes, of man; of birds.

Eyes of man and birds.

Farmer, an observing.

Farmer, a witness.

Farmers, their dependence on the weather; weather-wisdom of.

Farmers rely on the weather; their knowledge of the weather.

Fieldfare; notes of.

Fieldfare notes.

Finch, purple (Carpodacus purpureus), the alter ego of the pine grosbeak; song of.

Finch, purple (Carpodacus purpureus), the counterpart of the pine grosbeak; song of.

Fishing. See Trout-fishing.

Fishing. See Trout fishing.

Flicker. See High-hole.

Flicker. Check out High-hole.

Flies, black.

Black flies.

Flycatcher, great crested (Myiarchus crinitus); nest of.

Flycatcher, great crested (Myiarchus crinitus); nest of.

Forest, a spruce; a burnt.

Forest, a spruce; a burned one.

Fox, red, bark of.

Red fox barking.

French Canadians.

Franco-Canadians.

Ghost story, a.

Ghost story.

Girl’s voice, a.

Girl's voice, a.

Goethe, on the weather.

Goethe on the weather.

Goldenrod.

Goldenrod flower.

Goldfinch, American (Astragalinus tristis), a shrike in a flock of.

Goldfinch, American (Astragalinus tristis), a type of shrike in a group of.

Goose, wild or Canada (Branta canadensis), notes of.

Goose, whether wild or Canada (Branta canadensis), notes of.

Grande Brûlure, La.

The Big Burn.

Greenfinch.

Green finch.

Grosbeak, blue (Guiraca cĂŠrulea), its resemblance to the indigo-bird; song of; nest of.

Grosbeak, blue (Guiraca cĂŠrulea), its similarity to the indigo-bird; its song; its nest.

Grosbeak, pine (Pinicola enucleator leucura); appearance and habits of; song of.

Grosbeak, pine (Pinicola enucleator leucura); looks and behaviors of; song of.

Grouse, ruffed. See Partridge.

Ruffed grouse. See partridge.

Grouse, spruce or Canada (Canachites canadensis canace).

Grouse, spruce, or Canada.

Guide, a Canadian.

Guide, a Canadian person.

Hawk, worried by the kingbird. See Hen-hawk.

Hawk, concerned about the kingbird. See Hen-hawk.

Hawk, chicken, a provident.

Hawk, chicken, a wise choice.

Hawk, fish, or American osprey (Pandion haliaëtus carolinensis).

Hawk, fish, or American osprey (Pandion haliaëtus carolinensis).

Hen-hawk, a love passage; in cubating habits.

Hen-hawk, a love passage; in incubating habits.

Hepatica.

Hepatica.

Highfall Brook.

Highfall Brook.

High-hole, or golden-shafted woodpecker, or flicker (Colaptes auratus luteus), a household of; a tame young one; nest of.

High-hole, or golden-shafted woodpecker, or flicker (Colaptes auratus luteus), a family of; a domesticated young one; nest of.

Honey, as an article of food; with the ancients and in mythology; of various countries.

Honey, as a food item; with ancient cultures and in mythology; from various countries.

Honey-bee, gathering honey and pollen; wax-making; life of the drone; life of the queen; democratic government; description of queen and drone; swarming; wildness of; favorite hives; mortality of; acuteness of sight.

Honey-bee, collecting honey and pollen; making wax; the life of the drone; the life of the queen; democratic governance; description of the queen and drone; swarming; wild behavior; preferred hives; lifespan; sharpness of vision.

Honey-locust.

Honey locust.

Horse-fly.

Horsefly.

Hummingbird, ruby-throated (Trochilus colubris), strange death of a; nest of.

Hummingbird, ruby-throated (Trochilus colubris), unusual death of a; nest of.

Hyla, Pickering’s, in the woods.

Hyla, Pickering's, in the woods.

Indigo-bird, or indigo bunting (Cyanospiza cyanea), a petit duplicate of the blue grosbeak; song of; nest of.

Indigo-bird, or indigo bunting (Cyanospiza cyanea), a small version of the blue grosbeak; its song; its nest.

Jackdaw, nest of.

Jackdaw nest.

Jacques Cartier River, trouting on.

Jacques Cartier River, fishing for trout.

Jay, blue (Cyanocitta cristata); worrying a screech owl.

Jay, blue (Cyanocitta cristata); bothering a screech owl.

Jay, Canada (Perisoreus canadensis).

Jay, Canada (Gray Jay).

Jay, European, notes of.

Jay, European, notes.

Junco, slate-colored. See Snowbird.

Slate-colored Junco. See Snowbird.

Kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus), worrying hawks.

Kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus), alarming hawks.

Kingfisher, belted (Ceryle alcyon); notes of; nest of.

Kingfisher, belted (Ceryle alcyon); notes on; nest of.

Kinglet (Regulus sp.).

Kinglet (Regulus sp.).

La Chance.

The Luck.

Lake, nature as seen from a; life in and about a.

Lake, nature viewed from a; life in and around a.

Lake Jacques Cartier, Great; an excursion to.

Lake Jacques Cartier, Great; a trip to.

Lake Jacques Cartier, Little; trout-fishing in.

Lake Jacques Cartier, Little; fishing for trout in.

Lake Memphremagog.

Lake Memphremagog.

Lake St. John.

Lake St. John.

Lark. See Skylark.

Lark. See Skylark.

Lark, shore or horned (Otocoris alpestris).

Lark, shore or horned (Otocoris alpestris).

Ledges, the fascination of.

Ledges, the appeal of.

Lily, spotted.

Lily, seen.

Linden. See Basswood.

Linden. See Basswood.

Locusts, as an article of food.

Locusts as food.

Longspur, Lapland (Calcarius lapponicus).

Lapland Longspur (Calcarius lapponicus).

Loon (Gavia imber); laughter of.

Loon (Gavia imber); laughing sound.

Maiden, a backwoods.

Maiden, a rural area.

Maple, red.

Red maple.

Maple, sugar.

Maple syrup.

Marigold, marsh.

Marigold, marsh.

Marmot. See Woodchuck.

Marmot. Refer Woodchuck.

Meadowlark (Sturnella magna).

Meadowlark (Sturnella magna).

Metapedia River.

Metapedia River.

Midges.

Midges.

Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos); song of.

Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos); song.

Montmorenci, Falls of.

Montmorency Falls.

Moose.

Moose.

Morancy River.

Morancy River.

Mountains, poetry of.

Mountain poetry.

Mouse, common house.

House mouse.

Neversink River, trouting on; trouting on the East Branch of.

Neversink River, fishing for trout; fishing on the East Branch of.

New Brunswick, journey through; streams of.

New Brunswick, journey through; streams of.

Nightingale, notes of.

Nightingale, sound of.

Observation, powers and habits of.

Observation, powers, and habits.

Oriole, Baltimore (Icterus galbula), nest of.

Oriole, Baltimore (Icterus galbula), nest of.

Osprey, American. See Hawk, fish.

Osprey, American. See Fish hawk.

Ouzel, ring.

Ouzel, call.

Oven-bird (Seiurus aurocapillus).

Oven bird (Seiurus aurocapillus).

Owl, screech (Megascops asio), worried by other birds; in captivity; wail of.

Owl, screech (Megascops asio), disturbed by other birds; in captivity; wail of.

Panther, American, cry of.

American panther's cry.

Partridge, or ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus).

Partridge, or ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus).

Peakamoose.

Peakamoose.

Pewee, wood (Contopus virens), notes of.

Pewee, wood (Contopus virens), sounds of.

PhƓbe-bird (Sayornis phƓbe); nest of.

Phoebe bird (Sayornis phoebe); nest of.

Pigeon, passenger (Ectopistes migratorius); nests of.

Pigeon, passenger (Ectopistes migratorius); nesting sites.

Pipit, American, or titlark (Anthus pensilvanicus).

American Pipit (Anthus pensilvanicus).

Porcupine, Canada, adventure with a; description of; his armor of quills; at Balsam Lake.

Porcupine, Canada, adventure with a description of his quill armor at Balsam Lake.

Porpoise, white.

White porpoise.

Quebec.

Quebec.

Raccoon, or coon, voice of; den of.

Raccoon, or coon, voice of; den of.

Rain, waves and pulsations of; history of; relaxing effect of; necessary to the mind; after drought; importance to man of an abundance; curious things reported to have fallen in; the formation of; storms; effect of electricity on; in winter and spring; signs of; in camp. See Thunder-storms and Weather.

Rain, waves, and rhythms of; the history of; soothing effects of; essential for the mind; after a dry spell; the significance of having plenty for people; strange things said to have fallen in; the development of; storms; the impact of electricity on; in winter and spring; indicators of; in camp. See Thunderstorms and Weather.

Raspberry, red.

Red raspberry.

Rat.

Rodent.

Rat, wood.

Rat, timber.

Redpoll (Acanthis linaria).

Redpoll (Acanthis linaria).

Redstart, European, nest of.

European redstart nest.

Redwing.

Red-winged Blackbird.

Restigouche River.

Restigouche River.

RiviĂšre du Loup.

RiviĂšre du Loup.

Robin, American (Merula migratoria); notes of.

American Robin (Merula migratoria); observations.

Robin redbreast, song of.

Robin redbreast's song.

Rondout Creek; camping and trouting on.

Rondout Creek: camping and fishing for trout.

Rose.

Rose.

Rye.

Rye bread.

Saguenay River, scenery of.

Saguenay River scenery.

St. Alphonse.

St. Alphonse.

St. Lawrence; down the.

St. Lawrence; go down the.

Salmon.

Salmon.

Sapsucker, yellow-bellied. See Woodpecker, yellow-bellied.

Yellow-bellied sapsucker. See Yellow-bellied woodpecker.

Scenery-hunting.

Scenery searching.

Schoolhouse, a country.

Schoolhouse, a nation.

Shakespeare, quotations from; power and beauty in his poetry.

Shakespeare, quotes from; strength and beauty in his poetry.

Shanly, C. D., his poem, The Walker of the Snow.

Shanly, C. D., his poem, The Walker of the Snow.

Shrike (Lanius sp.).

Shrike (Lanius sp.).

Shrike, northern. See Butcherbird.

Northern Shrike. See Butcherbird.

Silkweed.

Silkweed.

Skunk, den of.

Skunk den.

Skylark, song of.

Skylark, its song.

Snake, and catfish.

Snake and catfish.

Snapdragon.

Snapdragon.

Snow, a sign of.

Snow, a sign of winter.

Snowbird, or slate-colored junco (Junco hyemalis).

Snowbird, or dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis).

Snowflake. See Bunting, snow.

Snowflake. See Bunting, snow.

Sparrow, English (Passer domesticus), a comedy; notes of.

Sparrow, English (Passer domesticus), a comedy; notes of.

Sparrow, reed, song of.

Song of the reed sparrow.

Sparrow, song (Melospiza einerea melodia), song of.

Sparrow, song (Melospiza einerea melodia), song of.

Sparrow, white-throated (Zonotrichia albicollis), song of.

Sparrow, white-throated (Zonotrichia albicollis), sound of.

Sparrows, songs of.

Songs of sparrows.

Spring-beauty.

Spring beauty.

Spruce, a Canadian forest of.

Spruce, a Canadian forest.

Squirrel, gray.

Gray squirrel.

Squirrel, red; playing tag.

Red squirrel playing tag.

Starling, European, notes of; nest of.

Starling, European, notes of; nest of.

Starling, red-shouldered, or red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phƓniceus).

Red-shouldered or red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phƓniceus).

Strawberries, Dr. Parr and Dr. Boteler on; praise of; odor of; Downer; Wilson; wild; alpine; cultivation of.

Strawberries, Dr. Parr and Dr. Boteler about; praise for; scent of; Downer; Wilson; wild; alpine; growing methods.

Sumach.

Sumac.

Swallow, an albino.

Albino swallow.

Swallows, on damp days.

Swallows on rainy days.

Swift, European, notes of.

Swift European notes.

Tadousac.

Tadoussac.

Tanager, scarlet (Piranga erythromelas), song of.

Tanager, scarlet (Piranga erythromelas), song of.

Thoreau, Henry D.; quotation from.

Thoreau, Henry D.; quote from.

Throstle.

Throstle.

Thrush, hermit (Hylocichla guttata pallasii); song of.

Thrush, hermit (Hylocichla guttata pallasii); song of.

Thrush, missel; pugnaciousness of; notes of.

Thrush, mistletoe; aggressiveness of; sounds of.

Thrush, White’s.

White's Thrush.

Thrush, wood (Hylocichla mustelina), song of.

Thrush, wood (Hylocichla mustelina), song of.

Thunder-storms; in the woods.

Thunderstorms in the woods.

Titlark. See Pipit, American.

Titlark. See American Pipit.

Tree-toads, young.

Tree frogs, young.

Trout, brook, markings of; of the Neversink; cannibals; of the Beaverkill; jumping; of Balsam Lake; spawning of; of the Catskill waters; an unsuccessful fight with a; a six-pound; two varieties in Jacques Cartier River.

Trout, brook, markings of; of the Neversink; cannibals; of the Beaverkill; jumping; of Balsam Lake; spawning of; of the Catskill waters; an unsuccessful fight with a; a six-pound; two varieties in Jacques Cartier River.

Trout-fishing, as an introduction to nature; the heart the proper bait in; on the Neversink; on the Beaverkill; in Balsam Lake; pleasures and discomforts of an excursion; on the Rondout; on the East Branch of the Neversink; in Canada; catching a six-pounder.

Trout fishing as a way to connect with nature; having the right bait; on the Neversink; on the Beaverkill; in Balsam Lake; the joys and challenges of a trip; on the Rondout; on the East Branch of the Neversink; in Canada; catching a six-pound trout.

Trout streams, beauties of; the ideal; at the headwaters of the Delaware; clearness of; thriving only in the woods.

Trout streams, the beauties of nature; the ideal; at the headwaters of the Delaware; clear water; thriving only in the woods.

Violets.

Violets.

Vireo, song of.

Vireo song.

Vireo, red-eyed (Vireo olivaceus), song of.

Vireo, red-eyed (Vireo olivaceus), song of.

Walker of the Snow, The, by C. D. Shanly.

Walker of the Snow, The, by C. D. Shanly.

Walking, benefits of.

Benefits of walking.

Wallkill River.

Wallkill River.

Warbler, Blackburnian (Dendroica blackburniĂŠ).

Blackburnian Warbler (Dendroica blackburniĂŠ).

Warbler, black-throated blue (Dendroica cĂŠrulescens); finding the nest and young of; notes of; nest of.

Warbler, black-throated blue (Dendroica cĂŠrulescens); finding the nest and chicks of; notes on; nest of.

Warbler, Canada (Wilsonia canadensis).

Canada Warbler (Wilsonia canadensis).

Warbler, chestnut-sided (Dendroica pensylvanica).

Chestnut-sided warbler (Dendroica pensylvanica).

Warbler, mourning (Geothlypis philadelphia).

Mourning warbler (Geothlypis philadelphia).

Warbler, yellow-rumped or myrtle (Dendroica coronata), rescue of a.

Warbler, yellow-rumped or myrtle (Dendroica coronata), rescue of a.

Water, its importance in nature and in the life of man.

Water, its significance in nature and in human life.

Water-wagtail, small, or water-thrush (Seiurus noveboracensis).

Water-wagtail, small, or water-thrush (Seiurus noveboracensis).

Waxwing, Bohemian (Ampelis garrulus).

Bohemian Waxwing (Ampelis garrulus).

Waxwing, cedar. See Cedar-bird.

Cedar waxwing. See Cedar-bird.

Weather, the, the farmer’s dependence on; human changeableness of; getting into a rut; in literature; the law of alternation in; dry; laws of. See Rain and Thunder-storms.

Weather, the farmer’s reliance on; human unpredictability; getting stuck in a routine; in literature; the principle of alternation in; dry; principles of. See Rain and Thunder-storms.

Weather-breeders.

Weather influencers.

Weather-wisdom.

Weather tips.

Wheat.

Wheat.

Whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus), mother, eggs, and young; an awkward walker; nest of.

Whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus), mother, eggs, and young; an awkward walker; nest of.

White, Gilbert.

White, Gilbert.

Whitethroat; notes of.

Whitethroat; field notes.

Whitman, Walt, quotation from.

Quote from Walt Whitman.

Wilson, Alexander, quotation from.

Quote from Alexander Wilson.

Woodchuck, or marmot; hole of.

Woodchuck, or marmot; burrow of.

Wood-grouse.

Wood grouse.

Woodpecker, downy (Dryobates pubescens medianus).

Downy Woodpecker (Dryobates pubescens medianus).

Woodpecker, golden-shafted. See High-hole.

Golden-shafted woodpecker. See High-hole.

Woodpecker, yellow-bellied, or yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius).

Yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius).

Wordsworth, William, quotations from; the poet of the mountains.

Wordsworth, William, quotes from; the poet of the mountains.

Wren, European, song of.

European wren song.

Wren, winter (Olbiorchilus hiemalis).

Wren, winter (Olbiorchilus hiemalis).

Wrens, songs of.

Wrens' songs.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!