This is a modern-English version of Origins of the 'Forty-five : and other papers relating to that rising, originally written by unknown author(s). It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

PUBLICATIONS

PUBLICATIONS

OF THE

OF THE

SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY

SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY

SECOND SERIES

Second Series

VOL.
II

VOL. II


ORIGINS OF THE ’FORTY-FIVE

Origins of the ’45

March 1916

March 1916


ORIGINS OF THE ’FORTY-FIVE

AND OTHER PAPERS RELATING TO THAT RISING

AND OTHER PAPERS RELATING TO THAT UPRISING

Edited by
WALTER BIGGAR BLAIKIE
LL.D.

Edited by
WALTER BIGGAR BLAIKIE
LL.D.

EDINBURGH

EDINBURGH

Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable for the Scottish History Society

Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Officer for the Scottish History Society

1916

1916


[Pg v]

[Pg v]

PREFACE

I desire to express my thanks to the Government of the French Republic for permission to make transcripts and to print selections from State Papers preserved in the National Archives in Paris; to the Earl of Ancaster for permission to print the Drummond Castle Manuscript of Captain Daniel’s Progress; to the Earl of Galloway for Cardinal York’s Memorial to the Pope; to His Grace the Archbishop of St. Andrews for the use of papers elucidating the action of the Roman Catholic clergy in 1745; to Miss Grosett-Collins, who kindly lent me Grossett family papers; to Mrs. G. E. Forbes and Mr. Archibald Trotter of Colinton for private papers of the Lumisden family; to M. le Commandant Jean Colin of the French Army (author of Louis XV. et les Jacobites) for several valuable communications, and to Martin Haile for similar help.

I want to thank the Government of the French Republic for allowing me to make copies and print selections from State Papers kept in the National Archives in Paris; the Earl of Ancaster for allowing me to print the Drummond Castle Manuscript of Captain Daniel’s Progress; the Earl of Galloway for Cardinal York’s Memorial to the Pope; His Grace the Archbishop of St. Andrews for the use of documents explaining the actions of the Roman Catholic clergy in 1745; Miss Grosett-Collins for generously lending me Grossett family papers; Mrs. G. E. Forbes and Mr. Archibald Trotter of Colinton for private papers of the Lumisden family; M. le Commandant Jean Colin of the French Army (author of Louis XV. et les Jacobites) for several valuable communications, and Martin Haile for similar assistance.

To my cousin, Miss H. Tayler, joint author of The Book of the Duffs, I am indebted for transcripts of papers in the French Archives in Paris as well as for information from Duff family papers; to Miss Maria Lansdale for the transcript of the report of the Marquis d’Eguilles to Louis XV.; to Dr. W. A. Macnaughton, Stonehaven, for copies of the depositions referring to the evasion of Sir James Steuart; and to Miss Nairne, Salisbury, for the translation of Cardinal York’s Memorial.

To my cousin, Miss H. Tayler, co-author of The Book of the Duffs, I owe thanks for providing transcripts of documents from the French Archives in Paris, as well as insights from the Duff family papers; to Miss Maria Lansdale for the transcript of the Marquis d’Eguilles' report to Louis XV.; to Dr. W. A. Macnaughton in Stonehaven for copies of the statements regarding the evasion of Sir James Steuart; and to Miss Nairne in Salisbury for translating Cardinal York’s Memorial.

I have also to acknowledge general help from the Hon. Evan Charteris; Mr. William Mackay, Inverness; Mr. J. K. Stewart, secretary of the Stewart Society; Mr. J. R. N. Macphail, K.C.; Mr. J. M. Bulloch, author of[Pg vi] The House of Gordon; Dr. Watson, Professor of Celtic History, Edinburgh; Mr. P. J. Anderson, Aberdeen University Library; Colonel Lachlan Forbes; the Rev. Archibald Macdonald of Kiltarlity; and the Rev. W. C. Flint of Fort Augustus.

I also want to thank the Hon. Evan Charteris; Mr. William Mackay from Inverness; Mr. J. K. Stewart, the secretary of the Stewart Society; Mr. J. R. N. Macphail, K.C.; Mr. J. M. Bulloch, author of The House of Gordon; Dr. Watson, Professor of Celtic History at Edinburgh; Mr. P. J. Anderson from Aberdeen University Library; Colonel Lachlan Forbes; the Rev. Archibald Macdonald from Kiltarlity; and the Rev. W. C. Flint from Fort Augustus.

I should be ungrateful if I did not make acknowledgment of the information I have received and made use of from five modern books—James Francis Edward, by Martin Haile; The King Over the Water, by A. Shield and Andrew Lang; The Jacobite Peerage, by the Marquis de Ruvigny; The History of Clan Gregor, by Miss Murray Macgregor; and The Clan Donald, by A. and A. Macdonald.

I would be ungrateful if I didn't acknowledge the information I've received and used from five modern books—James Francis Edward, by Martin Haile; The King Over the Water, by A. Shield and Andrew Lang; The Jacobite Peerage, by the Marquis de Ruvigny; The History of Clan Gregor, by Miss Murray Macgregor; and The Clan Donald, by A. and A. Macdonald.

Lastly, I have to thank Mr. W. Forbes Gray for kindly reading and revising proofs and for other assistance; and Mr. Alex. Mill, who has most carefully prepared the Index and given me constant help in many ways.

Lastly, I want to thank Mr. W. Forbes Gray for kindly reading and revising the proofs and for his other assistance; and Mr. Alex. Mill, who has meticulously prepared the Index and provided me with constant help in many ways.

W. B. B.

W. B. B.

Colinton, March 1, 1916.

Colinton, March 1, 1916.


CORRIGENDA

Page xxxix, lines 3 and 14, for ‘Excellency’ read ‘Eminence.’

Page xxxix, lines __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, replace ‘Excellency’ with ‘Eminence.’

Page 18, note 3, for see Appendix’ read ‘see Introduction, p. xxiii.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 140]

Page 18, note 3, for see Appendix’ read ‘see Introduction, p. xxiii.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 140]

Page 47, note 1, for ‘John Butler’ read ‘John Boyle.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 180]

Page 47, note 1, for ‘John Butler’ read ‘John Boyle.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 180]

Page 113, note 3, last line, for ‘1745’ read ‘1746.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 323]

Page 113, note 3, last line, for ‘1745’ read ‘1746.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 323]


SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY

The Editor of ‘ORIGINS OF THE FORTY-FIVE’ requests members to make the following corrections:—

The editor of ‘ORIGINS OF THE FORTY-FIVE’ asks members to make the following corrections:—

Page xviii, line 20, ‘September 3rd’ should be ‘September 1st.’

Page xviii, line 20, ‘September 3rd’ should be ‘September 1st.’

Page xxv, line 25, the age of Glenbucket should be ‘sixty-four,’ and at page lxi, line 6, his age should be ‘seventy-two.’

Page xxv, line 25, Glenbucket's age should be 'sixty-four,' and at page lxi, line 6, his age should be 'seventy-two.'

In a letter in the Stuart Papers (Windsor), from Glenbucket to Edgar, dated St. Ouen, 21 Aug. 1747, he states his age to be seventy-four.

In a letter in the Stuart Papers (Windsor), from Glenbucket to Edgar, dated St. Ouen, August 21, 1747, he states that he is seventy-four years old.

Page 97, line 22 of note, ‘Clan Donald iii, 37,’ should be ‘iii, 337.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 301]

Page 97, line 22 of note, ‘Clan Donald iii, 37,’ should be ‘iii, 337.’ [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 301]

Page 164, note 1 [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 388], and again in Genealogical Table, page 422, ‘Abercromby of Fettercairn’ should be ‘of Fetterneir.’

Page 164, note 1 [Transcriber’s note: found in footnote 388], and again in Genealogical Table, page 422, ‘Abercromby of Fettercairn’ should be ‘of Fetterneir.’

June 4, 1917.

June 4, 1917.


[Pg vii]

[Pg vii]

CONTENTS

PAGE
INTRODUCTION ix
Documents of John Murray of Broughton xlix
Highlands Memorial liii
The recent Rebellion in Ross and Sutherland lv
The Uprising in Aberdeen and Banff lvii
Captain Daniel's Journey lxiv
Prince Charles's Travels in the Hebrides lxx
Narrative of Ludovick Grant of Grant lxxiii
Rev. John Grant and the Grants of Sheugly lxxvi
Grossett’s Memorial and Accounts lxxviii
The Battles of Preston, Falkirk, and Culloden lxxxiv
Documents of John Murray of Broughton discovered after Culloden 3
Memorial About the Highlands, written by Alexander Macbean, A.M., Minister of Inverness 71
An Account of the Recent Rebellion from Ross and Sutherland, written by Daniel Munro, Minister of Tain 95
Memories of the Rebellion in 1745 and 1746, regarding the Counties of Aberdeen and Banff 113
A True Account of Mr. John Daniel’s Journey with Prince Charles Edward in 1745 and 1746, written by himself 167
Neil Maceachain’s Story of Prince Charles’ Travels in the Hebrides 227[Pg viii]
A Brief Account of Ludovick Grant of Grant's Actions during the Rebellion 269
The Case of Rev. John Grant, Minister of Urquhart; and Alexander Grant of Sheugly in Urquhart, and his son James Grant 313
A Story of Various Services Provided, Along with a Summary of Money Spent on Government Duties During the Recent Rebellion, by Walter Grossett 335
Letters and Orders from the Correspondence of Walter Grossett 379
A Brief Overview of the Battles of Preston, Falkirk, and Culloden, by Andrew Lumisden, who was the Private Secretary to Prince Charles 405
APPENDICES—
I. The Jacobite Lord Sempill 421
II. Murray and the Bishopric of Edinburgh 422
III. Sir James Steuart 423
The Guildhall Relief Fund 429
V. Cardinal York’s Letter to the Pope 434
VI. The Macdonalds 449
VII. Tables displaying the Relationships of Highland Chiefs 451
VIII. Lists of Highland Gentlemen who participated in the 'Forty-five 454
INDEX 459

[Pg ix]

INTRODUCTION

James Francis Edward, King James III. and VIII. of the Jacobites, the Old Pretender of his enemies, and the Chevalier de St. George of historians, was born at St. James’s Palace on 10th June 1688. On the landing of William of Orange and the outbreak of the Revolution, the young Prince and his mother were sent to France, arriving at Calais on 11th December (O.S.);[1] the King left England a fortnight later and landed at Ambleteuse on Christmas Day (O.S.). The château of St. Germain-en-Laye near Paris was assigned as a residence for the royal exiles, and this château was the home of the Chevalier de St. George for twenty-four years.

James Francis Edward, King James III. and VIII. of the Jacobites, known as the Old Pretender by his enemies and the Chevalier de St. George by historians, was born at St. James’s Palace on June 10, 1688. When William of Orange landed and the Revolution began, the young prince and his mother were sent to France, arriving in Calais on December 11 (O.S.); [1] the King left England two weeks later and landed in Ambleteuse on Christmas Day (O.S.). The château of St. Germain-en-Laye near Paris was designated as the residence for the royal exiles, and this château was the home of the Chevalier de St. George for twenty-four years.

James II. and VII. died on 5th September 1701 (16th Sept. N.S.), and immediately on his death Louis XIV. acknowledged his son as king, and promised to further his interests to the best of his power.

James II and VII died on September 5, 1701 (September 16 on the New Style calendar), and right after his death, Louis XIV recognized his son as king and promised to support his interests as much as he could.

The Scots Plot, 1703.[2]

The first opportunity of putting the altruistic intention of the King of France into operation occurred within a year of King James’s death, and the evil genius of the project was Simon Fraser, the notorious Lord Lovat.

The first chance to put the King of France's altruistic plan into action came a year after King James's death, and the main troublemaker of the project was Simon Fraser, the infamous Lord Lovat.

Lovat, whose scandalous conduct had shocked the[Pg x] people of Scotland, was outlawed by the courts for a criminal outrage, and fled to France in the summer of 1702. There, in spite of the character he bore, he so ingratiated himself with the papal nuncio that he obtained a private audience with Louis XIV., an honour unprecedented for a foreigner. To him he unfolded a scheme for a Stuart Restoration. He had, he said, before leaving Scotland visited the principal chiefs of the Highland clans and a great number of the lords of the Lowlands along with the Earl Marischal. They were ready to take up arms and hazard their lives and fortunes for the Stuart cause, and had given him a commission to represent them in France. The foundation of his scheme was to rely on the Highlanders. They were the only inhabitants of Great Britain who had retained the habit of the use of arms, and they were ready to act at once. Lord Middleton and the Lowland Jacobites sneered at them as mere banditti and cattle-stealers, but Lovat knew that they, with an instinctive love of fighting, were capable of being formed into efficient and very hardy soldiers. He proposed that the King of France should furnish a force of 5000 French soldiers, 100,000 crowns in money, and arms and equipment for 20,000 men. The main body of troops would land at Dundee where it would be near the central Highlands, and a detachment would be sent to western Invernessshire, with the object of capturing Fort William, which overawed the western clans. The design was an excellent one, and was approved by King Louis. But before putting it into execution the ministry sent Lovat back to obtain further information, and with him they sent John Murray, a naturalised Frenchman, brother of the laird of Abercairney, who was to check Lovat’s reports.

Lovat, whose scandalous behavior had shocked the[Pg x] people of Scotland, was declared an outlaw by the courts for a serious crime and fled to France in the summer of 1702. There, despite his reputation, he won over the papal nuncio and secured a private meeting with Louis XIV., a rare honor for a foreigner. He laid out a plan for a Stuart Restoration. He claimed that before leaving Scotland, he had visited the key chiefs of the Highland clans and many lords of the Lowlands, along with the Earl Marischal. They were prepared to take up arms and risk their lives and fortunes for the Stuart cause, and had given him a commission to represent them in France. The core of his plan relied on the Highlanders. They were the only people in Great Britain who still regularly used weapons, and they were ready to act immediately. Lord Middleton and the Lowland Jacobites mocked them as nothing more than bandits and cattle thieves, but Lovat knew that, with their natural love for fighting, they could be trained into effective and resilient soldiers. He proposed that the King of France provide a force of 5,000 French soldiers, 100,000 crowns in cash, and weapons and supplies for 20,000 men. The main troops would land at Dundee, which was close to the central Highlands, and a detachment would be sent to western Inverness-shire to capture Fort William, which intimidated the western clans. The plan was solid and received approval from King Louis. However, before moving forward, the ministry sent Lovat back to gather more information, along with John Murray, a naturalized Frenchman and brother of the laird of Abercairney, who would verify Lovat’s reports.

It is characteristic of the state of the exiled Court, that it was rent with discord, and that Lord Middleton, Jacobite Secretary of State, who hated Lovat, privately[Pg xi] sent emissaries of his own to spy on him and to blight his prospects.

The exiled Court was marked by conflict, and Lord Middleton, the Jacobite Secretary of State, who despised Lovat, secretly[Pg xi] sent his own spies to watch him and ruin his chances.

Lovat duly arrived in Scotland, but the history of his mission is pitiful and humiliating. He betrayed the project to the Duke of Queensberry, Queen Anne’s High Commissioner to the Scots Estates, and, by falsely suggesting the treason of Queensberry’s political enemies, the Dukes of Hamilton and Atholl, befooled that functionary into granting him a safe conduct to protect him from arrest for outlawry.

Lovat eventually made it to Scotland, but the story of his mission is sad and shameful. He betrayed the plan to the Duke of Queensberry, who was Queen Anne’s High Commissioner to the Scots Estates, and by wrongly implying that Queensberry’s political rivals, the Dukes of Hamilton and Atholl, were traitors, he tricked that official into giving him safe passage to keep him from being arrested for being an outlaw.

When Lovat returned to France he was arrested under a lettre de cachet and confined a close prisoner for many years, some records say in the Bastille, but Lovat himself says at Angoulême.

When Lovat returned to France, he was arrested under a lettre de cachet and held as a close prisoner for many years. Some records claim he was in the Bastille, but Lovat himself states he was in Angoulême.

The whole affair had little effect in Scotland beyond compassing the disgrace of Queensberry and his temporary loss of office, but it had lasting influence in France and reacted on all future projects of Jacobite action. For, first, it instilled into the French king and his ministers the suspicious feeling that Jacobite adventurers were not entirely to be trusted. And second, Lovat’s account of the fighting quality of the Highlanders and of their devotion to the Stuarts so impressed itself on both the French Court and that of St. Germains that they felt that in the Highlands of Scotland they would ever find a point d’appui for a rising. Lovat’s report, in fact, identified the Highlanders with Jacobitism.

The whole situation had little impact in Scotland aside from leading to the disgrace of Queensberry and his temporary loss of office, but it had a lasting effect in France and influenced all future Jacobite endeavors. First, it made the French king and his ministers suspicious, believing that Jacobite adventurers couldn't be fully trusted. Second, Lovat’s description of the fighting skills of the Highlanders and their loyalty to the Stuarts left a strong impression on both the French Court and that of St. Germains, making them feel that they could always rely on the Highlands of Scotland as a base for a rebellion. Lovat’s report essentially associated the Highlanders with Jacobitism.

The French Descent, 1708.[3]

Scotland was the scene of the next design for a restoration, and the principal agent of the French Court was a certain Colonel Nathaniel Hooke. Hooke had been sent[Pg xii] to Scotland in the year 1705, to see if that country was in such a state as to afford a reasonable prospect of an expedition in favour of the exiled Stuart. In the year 1707, while the Union was being forced upon an unwilling population, and discontent was rife throughout the country on account of that unpopular measure, Hooke was again sent, and although not entirely satisfied with all he saw and heard, he returned with favourable accounts on the whole. Among other documents he brought with him was a Memorial of certain Scottish lords to the Chevalier, in which, among other things, it was stated that if James, under the protection of His Most Christian Majesty (Louis XIV.), would come and put himself at the head of his people in Scotland, ‘the whole nation will rise upon the arrival of its King, who will become master of Scotland without any opposition, and the present Government will be intirely abolished.’ It was some months before the French king gave any answer. St. Simon in his Memoires says that Louis XIV. was so disheartened by his previous failure that he would not at first listen to the suggestion of a French expedition; and it was only through the efforts of Madame de Maintenon that he was persuaded to sanction an invading force. Even then much time was wasted, and it was not until the spring of 1708 that a squadron was equipped under the command of the Admiral de Forbin, and a small army under the Comte de Gasse. Even when ready to sail, the constant and proverbial ill-luck of the Stuarts overtook the poor Chevalier. He caught measles, which still further delayed the expedition. By this time, naturally, the[Pg xiii] British Government had learned all about the scheme, and made their naval preparations accordingly. At last, on the 17th March, James, hardly convalescent, wrapped in blankets, was carried on board the flagship at Dunkirk. The squadron was to have proceeded to the Firth of Forth and to have landed the Chevalier at Leith, where his partisans were prepared to proclaim him king at Edinburgh. Possibly because of bad seamanship, possibly because of treachery,[4] the French admiral missed the Firth of Forth, and found himself off Montrose. He turned, and could proceed no nearer Edinburgh than the Isle of May, off which he anchored. There the British Fleet, which had followed him in close pursuit, discovered him. The admiral weighed anchor, and fought a naval action in which he lost one of his ships. He then retreated towards the north of Scotland. James implored to be set ashore even if it were only in a small boat by himself, but his solicitations were in vain. The admiral positively refused, saying that he had received instructions from the French king to be as careful of the Chevalier as if he were Louis himself; so Forbin carried him back to Dunkirk, where the heart-broken exile was landed on the 6th of April, having been absent only twenty days, and having lost one of the most likely opportunities that ever occurred for his restoration to his ancient kingdom of Scotland, if not to England.

Scotland was the site of the next plan for a restoration, and the main representative of the French Court was a certain Colonel Nathaniel Hooke. Hooke had been sent[Pg xii] to Scotland in 1705 to see if the country was in a good enough condition to support an expedition in favor of the exiled Stuart. In 1707, while the Union was being imposed on an unwilling population, causing widespread discontent due to that unpopular measure, Hooke was sent again. Although he wasn't entirely pleased with everything he saw and heard, he returned with mostly positive reports. Among other documents, he brought back a Memorial from certain Scottish lords to the Chevalier, stating that if James, under the protection of His Most Christian Majesty (Louis XIV.), would come and lead his people in Scotland, "the whole nation will rise upon the arrival of its King, who will become master of Scotland without any opposition, and the current Government will be completely abolished." It took several months before the French king responded. St. Simon in his Memoires mentions that Louis XIV. was so discouraged by his previous failure that he initially wouldn’t entertain the idea of a French expedition; it was only through the efforts of Madame de Maintenon that he agreed to support an invading force. Even then, a lot of time was wasted, and it wasn’t until spring 1708 that a squadron was prepared under Admiral de Forbin, with a small army led by Comte de Gasse. Even when ready to set sail, the constant and famous misfortunes of the Stuarts caught up with the unfortunate Chevalier. He contracted measles, which further delayed the expedition. By then, the[Pg xiii] British Government had gotten wind of the plan and made their naval preparations accordingly. Finally, on March 17, James, barely recovered, was wrapped in blankets and carried aboard the flagship at Dunkirk. The squadron was supposed to go to the Firth of Forth and land the Chevalier at Leith, where his supporters were ready to declare him king in Edinburgh. Perhaps due to poor navigation, or possibly treachery, the French admiral missed the Firth of Forth and ended up off Montrose. He turned back and managed to get no closer to Edinburgh than the Isle of May, where he anchored. There, the British Fleet, which had been pursuing him closely, found him. The admiral weighed anchor and engaged in a naval battle, during which he lost one of his ships. He then retreated north towards Scotland. James begged to be put ashore, even if it was just in a small boat alone, but his pleas were ignored. The admiral firmly refused, stating that he had received orders from the French king to protect the Chevalier as if he were Louis himself. So, Forbin took him back to Dunkirk, where the heartbroken exile landed on April 6, having been away for only twenty days and losing one of the best chances ever for his restoration to his ancient kingdom of Scotland, if not England.

Expulsion from France, 1713.

After his return to France the Chevalier joined the French army. In 1708 he fought at Oudenarde and Lille, and the following year at Malplaquet. His gallant conduct won golden opinions from Marlborough and his troops. The[Pg xiv] British soldiers drank his health. James visited their outposts and they cheered him. What Thackeray puts into the mouth of a British officer well describes the situation: ‘If that young gentleman would but ride over to our camp, instead of Villars’s, toss up his hat and say, “Here am I, the King, who’ll follow me?” by the Lord the whole army would rise and carry him home again, and beat Villars, and take Paris by the way.’[5] But James stayed with the French, and the war ended with the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. This treaty gave the crown of Spain to the Bourbons, Gibraltar and the slave-trade to the British, and pronounced the expulsion of the Stuarts from France. A new asylum was found for the Chevalier in Lorraine, which, though an independent duchy, was largely under the domination of France. The Chevalier’s residence was fixed at Bar-le-Duc, and there he went in February 1713.

After returning to France, the Chevalier joined the French army. In 1708, he fought at Oudenarde and Lille, and the next year at Malplaquet. His brave actions earned him high praise from Marlborough and his troops. The[Pg xiv] British soldiers toasted to his health. James visited their outposts, and they cheered for him. What Thackeray has a British officer say perfectly captures the moment: "If that young gentleman would just ride over to our camp instead of Villars’s, toss up his hat, and say, 'Here I am, the King, who’ll follow me?' by the Lord, the whole army would rise and take him home again, beat Villars, and take Paris on the way."[5] But James stayed with the French, and the war concluded with the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. This treaty awarded the crown of Spain to the Bourbons, Gibraltar and the slave trade to the British, and mandated the expulsion of the Stuarts from France. The Chevalier found a new refuge in Lorraine, which, although an independent duchy, was mostly under French control. The Chevalier settled in Bar-le-Duc, where he arrived in February 1713.

In August 1714, on the death of Queen Anne, James made a trip to Paris to be ready for action should his presence be required, but the French Government sent him back to Bar-le-Duc. The death of Louis XIV. on 1st September 1715 (N.S.) was the next blow the Jacobite cause sustained. The government of France passed to the Duke of Orleans as Regent, and his policy was friendship with the British Government.

In August 1714, after Queen Anne died, James traveled to Paris to be prepared to act if needed, but the French Government sent him back to Bar-le-Duc. The death of LouisXIV. on September 1, 1715 (N.S.) was the next setback for the Jacobite cause. The government of France went to the Duke of Orleans as Regent, and his approach was to maintain friendly relations with the British Government.

The Fifteen.[6]

Then came the Rising of 1715, which began at Braemar on 6th September, followed by the English rising in Northumberland under Forster. The movement in England was crushed at Preston on 13th November, the same day that the indecisive battle was fought at Sheriffmuir in Perthshire.

Then came the Rising of 1715, which started at Braemar on September 6th, followed by the English rising in Northumberland led by Forster. The movement in England was shut down at Preston on November 13th, the same day that the inconclusive battle was fought at Sheriffmuir in Perthshire.

[Pg xv]

[Pg xv]

Lord Mar made Perth his headquarters, and invited James to join the Scottish army. The Chevalier, who had moved to Paris in October, in strict secrecy, and in disguise, being watched by both French and English agents, managed, after many remarkable adventures, checks, and disappointments, to get away from Dunkirk on 16th December (27th N.S.), and to reach Peterhead on the 22nd. Thence he went to Perth, where he established his Court at the ancient royal palace of Scone. He was proclaimed king and exercised regal functions; some authorities say that he was crowned.[7] But James had come too late; mutual disappointment was the result. He had been assured that the whole kingdom was on his side, but he found only dissension and discontent. His constant melancholy depressed his followers. No decisive action was taken; the project had failed even before he arrived, and Lord Mar persuaded him that he would serve the cause best by retiring and waiting for a happier occasion.

Lord Mar made Perth his base and invited James to join the Scottish army. The Chevalier, who had secretly moved to Paris in October while disguised and being watched by both French and English spies, managed to escape Dunkirk on December 16th (27th N.S.) after many adventures, setbacks, and disappointments, and reached Peterhead on the 22nd. From there, he went to Perth, where he set up his Court at the old royal palace of Scone. He was declared king and took on royal duties; some sources even say he was crowned. But James had arrived too late; disappointment grew. He had been told that the entire kingdom was behind him, but he found only division and unrest. His ongoing sadness weighed down his supporters. No decisive actions were taken; the plan had already failed before he got there, and Lord Mar convinced him that he would better serve the cause by stepping back and waiting for a better opportunity.

James was forced to leave Scotland on 5th February 1716 (O.S.). He landed at Gravelines on 10th February (21st N.S.), went secretly to Paris, and concealed himself for a week in the Bois de Boulogne. Thence he went to Lorraine, where he was sorrowfully told by the Duke that he could no longer give him shelter. The power of Britain was great; no country that gave the exile a home could avoid a quarrel with that nation. The Pope seemed to be the only possible host, and James made his way to Avignon, then papal territory. But even Avignon was too near home for the British Government, which, through the French regent, brought pressure to[Pg xvi] bear on the Pope; the Chevalier was forced to leave Avignon in February 1717, and to cross the Alps into Italy. Here for some months he wandered without a home, but in July 1717 he settled at Urbino in the Papal States.

James had to leave Scotland on February 5, 1716 (O.S.). He arrived in Gravelines on February 10 (21st N.S.), went secretly to Paris, and hid for a week in the Bois de Boulogne. From there, he went to Lorraine, where the Duke sadly told him that he could no longer provide shelter. Britain's power was strong; no country that offered refuge to the exile could avoid a conflict with that nation. The Pope seemed to be the only possible host, so James traveled to Avignon, which was then papal territory. But even Avignon was too close for comfort for the British Government, which, through the French regent, pressured the Pope; James was forced to leave Avignon in February 1717 and cross the Alps into Italy. For several months, he drifted without a home, but in July 1717, he settled in Urbino in the Papal States.

Marriage to Clementina, 1719.[8]

For a time the cares of the Jacobite Court were centred on finding a wife of royal rank for the throneless king. After various unsuccessful proposals, the Chevalier became engaged to the Princess Clementina Sobieska, whose grandfather had been the warrior King of Poland. The Sobieski home was then at Ollau in Silesia; and in October 1718 James sent Colonel Hay to fetch his bride. The British Government determined to stop the marriage if possible. Pressure was put on the Emperor, who had Clementina arrested at Innsbruck while on her journey to Italy. Here the Princess remained a prisoner until the following April. The story of her rescue by Colonel Wogan is one of the romances of history, and has recently been the theme of an historical romance.[9] Wogan brought the princess safely to Bologna, and there she was married by proxy to James on 9th May 1719. While Wogan was executing his bridal mission, the Chevalier, who had almost given up hope of the marriage, had been called away to take his part in a project which seemed to augur a chance of success.

For a time, the concerns of the Jacobite Court were focused on finding a royal wife for the king without a throne. After several unsuccessful proposals, the Chevalier got engaged to Princess Clementina Sobieska, whose grandfather had been the warrior King of Poland. The Sobieski family was living in Ollau in Silesia at the time; in October 1718, James sent Colonel Hay to bring his bride. The British Government tried to prevent the marriage at all costs. They pressured the Emperor, who had Clementina arrested in Innsbruck while she was on her way to Italy. The Princess was held captive there until the following April. The tale of her rescue by Colonel Wogan is one of history's great romances and has recently inspired a historical novel. Wogan safely brought the princess to Bologna, where she married James by proxy on May 9, 1719. While Wogan was on this wedding mission, the Chevalier, who had nearly lost hope for the marriage, had been summoned to participate in a project that seemed to hold promise for success.

The Swedish Plot, 1716-17.

On the collapse of the rising of 1715, the Jacobite Court, despairing of assistance from France or Spain, had turned for aid to Charles XII. of Sweden. Charles had conceived a violent hatred for George I., who had acquired by purchase[Pg xvii] from the King of Denmark two secular bishoprics which had been taken from Sweden by the Danes, and which had been incorporated in the electorate of Hanover. As early as 1715 Charles listened to a project of the Duke of Berwick, by which he should send a force of Swedish troops to Scotland, but he was then too busy fighting the Danes to engage in the scheme. In 1717 the Jacobites renewed negotiations with Sweden, and a plan was formed for a general rising in England simultaneously with an invasion of Scotland by the Swedish king in person at the head of an army of 12,000 Swedes. The plot came to the knowledge of the British Government in time; the Swedish ambassador in London was arrested; the project came to nothing; but in the following year a more promising scheme for a Stuart restoration was formed.

After the failure of the 1715 uprising, the Jacobite Court, losing hope for help from France or Spain, sought assistance from Charles XII of Sweden. Charles developed a deep resentment towards George I, who had acquired by purchase from the King of Denmark two secular bishoprics taken from Sweden by the Danes and incorporated into the electorate of Hanover. As early as 1715, Charles considered a plan proposed by the Duke of Berwick to send Swedish troops to Scotland, but he was too occupied with fighting the Danes to pursue it. In 1717, the Jacobites renewed their talks with Sweden, and a plan was created for a widespread uprising in England to coincide with an invasion of Scotland led by the Swedish king himself with an army of 12,000 Swedes. The British Government learned of the plot in time; the Swedish ambassador in London was arrested; the plan fell through; however, the following year, a more promising scheme for restoring the Stuarts was developed.

The Spanish Expedition of 1719.[10]

Spain, smarting under the loss of her Italian possessions, ceded to Austria by the Peace of Utrecht, had declared war on the Emperor and had actually landed an army in Sicily. In compliance with treaty obligations, Great Britain had to defend the Emperor, and in August 1718 a British squadron engaged and destroyed a Spanish fleet off Cape Passaro. Alberoni, the Spanish minister, was furious and determined on reprisals. He entered into an alliance with the Swedish king; a plan for invading Great Britain was formed, and negotiations were opened with the Jacobite Court. The death of Charles XII. in December detached Sweden from the scheme, but Alberoni went on with his preparations. A great armada under Ormonde was to carry a Spanish army to the west of England, and a subsidiary expedition under the Earl Marischal was to land in north-western Scotland. The[Pg xviii] Chevalier was summoned to Spain to join the expedition, or failing that to follow it to England. The fleet sailed from Cadiz in March 1719. James had left Rome in February, travelling by sea to Catalonia and thence to Madrid and on to Corunna. He reached the latter port on 17th April, only to learn of the dispersal of the Spanish fleet by a storm and the complete collapse of the adventure.

Spain, still reeling from the loss of its Italian territories, which it had ceded to Austria in the Peace of Utrecht, declared war on the Emperor and actually landed an army in Sicily. Following its treaty obligations, Great Britain had to support the Emperor, and in August 1718, a British squadron confronted and destroyed a Spanish fleet off Cape Passaro. Alberoni, the Spanish minister, was furious and sought revenge. He formed an alliance with the King of Sweden; a plan to invade Great Britain was created, and talks began with the Jacobite Court. The death of Charles XII. in December caused Sweden to withdraw from the plan, but Alberoni continued with his preparations. A large armada led by Ormonde was set to carry a Spanish army to the west coast of England, while a secondary expedition under the Earl Marischal was planned to land in north-western Scotland. The [Pg xviii] Chevalier was called to Spain to join the expedition, or if that wasn't possible, to follow it to England. The fleet set sail from Cadiz in March 1719. James had left Rome in February, traveling by sea to Catalonia, then to Madrid, and on to Corunna. He arrived at the latter port on April 17th, only to find out that a storm had scattered the Spanish fleet and completely derailed the mission.

The auxiliary Scottish expedition, unconscious of the disaster, landed in the north-western Highlands; but after some vicissitudes and much dissension the attempt ended with the Battle of Glenshiel on the 10th of June—the Chevalier’s thirty-first birthday—and the surrender next day of the remainder of the Spanish troops, originally three hundred and seven in number.

The supportive Scottish expedition, unaware of the disaster, landed in the northwestern Highlands; but after several ups and downs and a lot of disagreement, the attempt concluded with the Battle of Glenshiel on June 10th—on the Chevalier's thirty-first birthday—and the surrender the next day of the remaining Spanish troops, which originally numbered three hundred and seven.

James returned from Corunna to Madrid, where he lingered for some time, a not very welcome guest. There he learned of the rescue of Princess Clementina and of his marriage by proxy. Returning to Italy in August, he met Clementina at Montefiascone, where he was married in person on September 1st, 1719.

James came back from Corunna to Madrid, where he stayed for a while, not being the most welcome guest. There, he found out about the rescue of Princess Clementina and that he had married her by proxy. Returning to Italy in August, he met Clementina at Montefiascone, where he married her in person on September 1st, 1719.

From this time forward until the end of his life, forty-seven years later, the Chevalier’s home was in Rome, where the Pope assigned him the Muti Palace as a residence, along with a country house at Albano, some thirteen miles from Rome.

From this point on until the end of his life, forty-seven years later, the Chevalier made his home in Rome, where the Pope assigned him the Muti Palace as his residence, along with a country house at Albano, about thirteen miles from Rome.

Birth of Charles Edward, 1720.

In 1720, on December 20th by British reckoning (Dec. 31st by the Gregorian calendar), Prince Charles Edward was born at Rome, and with the birth of an heir to the royal line, Jacobite hopes and activities revived.

In 1720, on December 20th according to the British calendar (Dec. 31st on the Gregorian calendar), Prince Charles Edward was born in Rome, and with the arrival of an heir to the royal line, Jacobite hopes and activities were reignited.

The Atterbury Plot, 1721-22.[11]

At this time the Jacobite interests in England were in charge of a Council of five members, frequently termed ‘the Junta.’ The members of this Council were the Earl of Arran, brother of Ormonde, the Earl of Orrery, Lord[Pg xix] North, Lord Gower, and Francis Atterbury, Bishop of Rochester. Of these Atterbury was by far the ablest, and in England was the life and soul of Jacobite contriving. A great scheme was devised, which is known in history as the Atterbury Plot. The details are somewhat obscure, and the unravelling of them is complicated by the existence of another scheme contemporaneous with Atterbury’s, apparently at first independent, but which became merged in the larger design. The author of this plot was Christopher Layer, a barrister of the Middle Temple. Generally, his scheme was secretly to enlist broken and discharged soldiers. They were to seize the Tower, the Bank, and the Mint, and to secure the Hanoverian royal family, who were to be deported. The larger scheme of the Junta was to obtain a foreign force of 5000 troops to be landed in England under the Duke of Ormonde, and risings were to be organised in different parts of the kingdom. The signal for the outbreak was to be the departure of George I. for Hanover, which was expected to take place in the summer.

At this time, the Jacobite interests in England were run by a Council of five members, often referred to as 'the Junta.' The members of this Council included the Earl of Arran, brother of Ormonde, the Earl of Orrery, Lord North, Lord Gower, and Francis Atterbury, Bishop of Rochester. Among them, Atterbury was by far the most capable and was the driving force behind Jacobite planning in England. A major scheme was put together, known in history as the Atterbury Plot. The specifics are somewhat unclear, and understanding them is complicated by the existence of another plan happening at the same time as Atterbury’s, which initially seemed independent but eventually merged into the larger design. The mastermind behind this plot was Christopher Layer, a barrister from the Middle Temple. His general plan was to secretly recruit broken and discharged soldiers. They were supposed to take control of the Tower, the Bank, and the Mint, and to detain the Hanoverian royal family, who were to be exiled. The Junta’s broader plan was to bring in a foreign force of 5,000 troops to be landed in England under the Duke of Ormonde, with uprisings planned in various parts of the country. The signal for the uprising was to be King George I's departure for Hanover, expected in the summer.

Layer, who does not seem to have been acting with Atterbury and the Junta until later, was in Rome in the early months of 1721, and there he unfolded his plan to the Jacobite Court. After he left, a plan of campaign was arranged which, however, seems to have been modified afterwards. The original intention was to begin the movement in Scotland, whither Lord Mar and General Dillon[12][Pg xx] were to proceed; and to accentuate the latter’s position as commander in Scotland he was created an earl in the Scottish peerage, although already an Irish (Jacobite) viscount. Lord Lansdowne was to command in Cornwall, Lord Strafford in the north, Lord North in London and Westminster, and Lord Arran was to go to Ireland. The Chevalier was to leave Rome when Mar and Dillon left Paris, and to make his way to Rotterdam via Frankfort, and there await events before deciding where it would be best to land. Things seemed to be prospering, but the English Jacobites did not sufficiently respond to the call for financial support. James, deeply disappointed, appealed to the Pope for help, only to be more bitterly mortified by his refusal. The Pope, in so many words, said that if the English Jacobites wanted a revolution they must pay for it themselves. The original orders for invasion were cancelled in April; but negotiations seem to have been continued with Spain through Cardinal Acquiviva, Spanish envoy at Rome, ever James’s friend. A revised plan of action was prepared. Wogan, who had been sent to Spain, had succeeded in procuring assistance from that country; ships had been prepared to carry a force of 5000 or 6000 men to Porto Longone, in the Isle of Elba, where James was to embark. In July, James was on the outlook for a Spanish fleet under Admiral Sorano.[13] But it was too late. The plot had been discovered, the demand for troops reaching the knowledge of the French ministers, who informed the British ambassador. Spain was compelled to prevent the embarkation, and King George did not go to Hanover that summer.

Layer, who didn’t seem to be working with Atterbury and the Junta until later, was in Rome in the early months of 1721, where he shared his plan with the Jacobite Court. After he left, a campaign plan was arranged, which, however, seems to have been changed later. The original intention was to start the movement in Scotland, where Lord Mar and General Dillon[12][Pg xx] were supposed to go; to strengthen Dillon's position as commander in Scotland, he was made an earl in the Scottish peerage, although he was already an Irish (Jacobite) viscount. Lord Lansdowne was set to lead in Cornwall, Lord Strafford in the north, Lord North in London and Westminster, and Lord Arran was to travel to Ireland. The Chevalier was to leave Rome when Mar and Dillon left Paris and travel to Rotterdam via Frankfurt, where he would wait for events before deciding where it would be best to land. Things seemed to be going well, but the English Jacobites didn’t respond enough to the call for financial support. James, feeling very disappointed, appealed to the Pope for help, only to be even more bitterly mortified by his refusal. The Pope clearly stated that if the English Jacobites wanted a revolution, they had to fund it themselves. The original orders for the invasion were canceled in April, but negotiations with Spain seemed to continue through Cardinal Acquiviva, the Spanish envoy in Rome and a friend of James. A revised action plan was prepared. Wogan, who had been sent to Spain, succeeded in getting support from that country; ships were prepared to carry a force of 5,000 or 6,000 men to Porto Longone on the Isle of Elba, where James was to embark. In July, James was watching for a Spanish fleet under Admiral Sorano.[13] But it was too late. The plot had been discovered, and the request for troops came to the attention of the French ministers, who informed the British ambassador. Spain was forced to prevent the embarkation, and King George didn’t go to Hanover that summer.

Mar had used the post office in spite of a warning by[Pg xxi] Atterbury not to do so; his correspondence was intercepted, and a letter was found which incriminated Atterbury and his associates. Government was not hasty in acting, and the first conspirator to be arrested was George Kelly, a Non-juring Irish clergyman who acted as Atterbury’s secretary. He was seized at his lodgings on May 21st; and he very nearly saved the situation. His papers and sword being placed in a window by his captors, Kelly managed during a moment of negligence to recover them. Holding his sword in his right hand he threatened to run through the first man who approached him, while all the time he held the incriminating papers to a candle with his left hand, and not till they were burned did he surrender. It was not until the end of August that Bishop Atterbury was taken into custody and committed to the Tower. His trial did not begin until the spring of the following year. Layer, who was betrayed by a mistress, was arrested in September and tried in November. He was condemned to death, but was respited from time to time in the hope that he would give evidence to incriminate Atterbury and his associates. Layer refused to reveal anything and was executed at Tyburn in May 1723, at the very time when the bishop’s trial was taking place in the House of Lords. Atterbury was found guilty: he was sentenced to be deprived of all his ecclesiastical benefices and functions, to be incapacitated from holding any civil offices, and to be banished from the kingdom for ever. His associates of the Junta escaped with comparatively light penalties. Kelly, sentenced to imprisonment during the King’s pleasure, was kept in the Tower until 1736, when he managed to escape, to reappear later in the drama. Atterbury went abroad and entered the Chevalier’s service. He died in exile at Paris in 1732, but he was buried in Westminster Abbey.

Mar had used the post office despite a warning from Atterbury not to do so; his mail was intercepted, and a letter was found that incriminated Atterbury and his associates. The government wasn’t quick to act, and the first conspirator to be arrested was George Kelly, a Non-juring Irish clergyman who was Atterbury’s secretary. He was taken into custody at his lodging on May 21st; and he nearly saved the situation. His captors placed his papers and sword in a window, and during a moment of negligence, Kelly managed to retrieve them. Holding his sword in his right hand, he threatened to stab the first person who came near while with his left hand, he held the incriminating papers to a candle, and only after they were burned did he surrender. It wasn’t until the end of August that Bishop Atterbury was arrested and sent to the Tower. His trial didn’t start until the spring of the following year. Layer, who was betrayed by a mistress, was arrested in September and tried in November. He was sentenced to death but was given reprieves from time to time in hopes that he would testify against Atterbury and his associates. Layer refused to disclose anything and was executed at Tyburn in May 1723, right when the bishop’s trial was occurring in the House of Lords. Atterbury was found guilty: he was sentenced to lose all his church positions and functions, to be barred from holding any civil office, and to be permanently banished from the kingdom. His associates in the Junta received comparatively lighter penalties. Kelly, who was sentenced to imprisonment at the King’s discretion, was held in the Tower until 1736, when he managed to escape, only to reappear later in the story. Atterbury went abroad and joined the Chevalier’s service. He died in exile in Paris in 1732, but he was buried in Westminster Abbey.

The failure of the schemes of Atterbury had a remarkable[Pg xxii] effect on the unfortunate Chevalier. Apparently weary of failure and longing for action, he wrote to the Pope on August 29th, 1722, offering to serve in a crusade against the Turks; but he was told it would not do, he must stick to his own task. To it he accordingly returned; and implicitly believing that his people were longing for his restoration, he issued a manifesto dated September 22nd, proposing ‘that if George I. will quietly deliver to him the throne of his fathers he will in return bestow upon George the title of king in his native dominions and invite all other states to confirm it.’[14] The manifesto was printed and circulated in England; it was ordered to be burned by the common hangman.

The failure of Atterbury's plans had a significant[Pg xxii] impact on the unfortunate Chevalier. Tired of setbacks and eager for action, he wrote to the Pope on August 29, 1722, offering to fight in a crusade against the Turks; however, he was told that wouldn't work, and he needed to focus on his own mission. So, he went back to it, fully believing that his supporters were eager for his return. On September 22, he issued a manifesto proposing that if George I. would peacefully hand over the throne of his ancestors, he would in return grant George the title of king in his native lands and ask other states to recognize it. [14] The manifesto was printed and distributed in England; it was ordered to be burned by the public executioner.

It is somewhat remarkable that although the Atterbury Expedition was to have been begun in Scotland, the records of the period make no mention of the project, nor do there seem to have been any preparations for a rising. The only suggestion of secret action being taken that I know of—and it is no more than a suggestion—is that in 1721, on the same day that General Dillon, who was to command in Scotland, was created a Scottish earl, a peerage was given to Sir James Grant of Grant by the Chevalier de St. George.[15] What the occasion of this honour may have been has never, so far as I know, been revealed.[16]

It’s quite noteworthy that although the Atterbury Expedition was supposed to start in Scotland, the historical records from that time don’t mention the project, nor do they indicate any preparations for a rebellion. The only hint of covert actions that I'm aware of—and it’s really just a hint—is that in 1721, on the same day that General Dillon, who was set to lead in Scotland, was made a Scottish earl, Sir James Grant of Grant was granted a peerage by the Chevalier de St. George.[15] The reason for this honor has never, to my knowledge, been disclosed.[16]

Affairs in Scotland.

Jacobite affairs in Scotland at that time were administered by a Lanarkshire laird, George Lockhart of Carnwath. Lockhart had been a member of the old Scots Estates[Pg xxiii] before the Union of the kingdoms in 1707, and after the Union he sat in the Imperial Parliament until 1715. In that year he raised a troop of horse for the Jacobite cause, and after the rising he suffered a long imprisonment, but was eventually released without trial. From 1718 to 1727 he acted as the Chevalier’s chief confidential agent in Scotland. His system of Jacobite management was by a body of trustees, which was organised in 1722, and acted as a committee of regency for the exiled king. In 1727 Lockhart’s correspondence fell into the hands of Government and he had to fly the country. He was permitted to return in the following year, but lived for the rest of his life in retirement, and took no further part in Jacobite affairs.[17]

Jacobite matters in Scotland at that time were overseen by a Lanarkshire landowner, George Lockhart of Carnwath. Lockhart had been a member of the old Scottish Estates[Pg xxiii] before the kingdoms united in 1707, and after the union, he served in the Imperial Parliament until 1715. That year, he raised a cavalry unit for the Jacobite cause, and after the uprising, he endured a long imprisonment but was eventually released without a trial. From 1718 to 1727, he was the Chevalier’s main confidential agent in Scotland. His method of Jacobite management involved a group of trustees, organized in 1722, which acted as a regency committee for the exiled king. In 1727, Lockhart’s correspondence was discovered by the government, forcing him to flee the country. He was allowed to return the following year but lived the rest of his life in retirement, and didn’t participate further in Jacobite matters.[17]

For some years after Lockhart’s flight, Scotland seems to have been without any official representative of the Jacobite Court. In May 1736, however, Colonel James Urquhart[18] was appointed, though under circumstances which have not yet been made known.

For several years after Lockhart's departure, Scotland appeared to be without any official representative of the Jacobite Court. In May 1736, however, Colonel James Urquhart[18] was appointed, though the details surrounding this appointment have not yet been disclosed.

The proposed expedition connected with the Atterbury Plot was the last project for an active campaign of[Pg xxiv] restoration in which the Chevalier was personally to embark. Scheming, of course, went on, but only once after this did James leave Italy. In 1727, on the death of George I., he hurried to Nancy to be ready for any emergency, but the Duke of Lorraine had reluctantly to refuse him hospitality. He retired to Avignon, but, as before, the British Government brought pressure to bear, and he had to go back to Rome. Six years later, on the death of Augustus the Strong, he was offered the elective throne of Poland; but this he declined, saying that his own country engaged his whole heart and all his inclinations, though he regretted that his second son, Henry, then eight years old, was too young to be a candidate for the crown worn by his Sobieski ancestor.

The planned expedition related to the Atterbury Plot was the final attempt for an active campaign of[Pg xxiv] restoration in which the Chevalier was personally involved. Scheming continued, of course, but James only left Italy one more time after this. In 1727, after GeorgeI. died, he rushed to Nancy to be prepared for any situation, but the Duke of Lorraine had to reluctantly decline him hospitality. He went back to Avignon, but, as before, the British Government pressured him, and he had to return to Rome. Six years later, after Augustus the Strong died, he was offered the elective throne of Poland; however, he turned it down, stating that his own country had his full heart and all his interests, although he wished his second son, Henry, who was then eight years old, was old enough to be a candidate for the crown worn by his Sobieski ancestor.

Charles Edward grows up.
The Cause languishes.

Meanwhile his elder son, Charles Edward, was growing up, and the hopes of the party were fixed on his future. His father wished him to learn the art of war, so in August 1734 he was sent to join a Spanish army under his cousin, the Duke of Berwick,[19] who was engaged in the campaign against Austria, which brought the crown of Naples to the Spanish Bourbons. Charles, then not quite fourteen, took part in the siege and capture of Gaeta, a fortress in Campania, and accompanied Don Carlos in his triumphant entry into Naples as king on August 9th. The Prince won much credit for his conduct in the field, but this was the end of his experience of war, and his campaign had lasted only six days. His father was anxious to extend his military education, but France and Spain in turn declined to allow him to serve with their armies. Even the Emperor, about to make war on the Turks in 1737, refused to allow the young prince to accompany his army. European potentates were unwilling to receive Charles[Pg xxv] Edward even as a visitor. The Venetian minister in London was ordered to quit England on twenty-four hours’ notice, because his Government had shown civilities to the Prince on a visit to Venice. The British Government was too vigilant to hoodwink, too strong to offend. Peace reigned throughout Europe: Jacobite activity was dormant both in England and in Scotland: the royal exiles were isolated at Rome, and it seemed as if all hope of a Stuart Restoration had been abandoned.

Meanwhile, his older son, Charles Edward, was growing up, and everyone had high hopes for his future. His father wanted him to learn about military tactics, so in August 1734, he was sent to join a Spanish army under his cousin, the Duke of Berwick, who was involved in the campaign against Austria, which aimed to bring the crown of Naples to the Spanish Bourbons. At just under fourteen, Charles took part in the siege and capture of Gaeta, a fortress in Campania, and accompanied Don Carlos in his victorious entry into Naples as king on August 9th. The Prince gained a lot of respect for his performance on the battlefield, but this was the end of his military experience, and his campaign only lasted six days. His father wanted him to further his military training, but both France and Spain refused to let him serve with their armies. Even the Emperor, who was about to go to war against the Turks in 1737, denied the young prince permission to join his army. European leaders were reluctant to host Charles Edward even as a visitor. The Venetian minister in London was ordered to leave England on twenty-four hours’ notice because his government had shown kindness to the Prince during a visit to Venice. The British Government was too alert to be deceived and too powerful to be offended. Peace prevailed throughout Europe: Jacobite activities were paused both in England and in Scotland; the royal exiles were isolated in Rome, and it seemed as if all hope for a Stuart Restoration had been given up.

The Mission of Glenbucket.

The first to inspire the Jacobite Court with new life and hope, and set in motion the events which led up to the great adventure of ’Forty-five was John Gordon of Glenbucket. This remarkable man was no county magnate nor of any particular family. At this time he possessed no landed property; he was merely the tenant of a farm in Glenlivet, which he held from the Duke of Gordon. His designation ‘of Glenbucket’ was derived from a small property in the Don valley which had been purchased by his grandfather, and which he inherited from his father. He was not a Highlander, having been born in the Aberdeenshire lowland district of Strathbogie, but he had so thoroughly conformed himself to Highland spirit and manners that he had won the affection and confidence of the Highlanders of Banffshire and Strathspey. Glenbucket was at this time about sixty-four years old. In his younger days he had been factor or chamberlain to the Duke of Gordon, a position which conferred on him considerable influence and power, particularly over the Duke’s Highland vassals. In the ’Fifteen he had commanded a regiment of the Gordon retainers, and behaved with gallantry and discretion throughout the campaign.[20] About the year 1724 he had ceased[Pg xxvi] to be the Duke’s representative, but his connection with the Highlanders was continued by the marriages of his daughters. One of them was the wife of Forbes of Skellater, a considerable laird in the Highland district of Upper Strathdon; another was married to the great chief of Glengarry; and a third to Macdonell of Lochgarry.[21]

The person who first brought new life and hope to the Jacobite Court and sparked the events leading to the great adventure of ’Forty-five was John Gordon of Glenbucket. This remarkable man wasn't a county bigwig or part of any prominent family. At that time, he owned no land; he was just the tenant of a farm in Glenlivet, which he leased from the Duke of Gordon. His title ‘of Glenbucket’ came from a small property in the Don valley that his grandfather had bought, and which he inherited from his father. He wasn’t a Highlander, having been born in the Aberdeenshire lowland area of Strathbogie, but he had adapted so well to Highland culture and ways that he earned the respect and trust of the Highlanders in Banffshire and Strathspey. Glenbucket was about sixty-four years old at this point. In his youth, he had been the factor or chamberlain to the Duke of Gordon, a role that gave him significant influence and power, especially over the Duke’s Highland tenants. In the ’Fifteen, he had led a regiment of the Gordon supporters and acted with bravery and good judgment throughout the campaign.[20] By around 1724, he had stopped being the Duke’s representative, but he maintained his ties with the Highlanders through his daughters' marriages. One of them married Forbes of Skellater, a notable laird in the Highland region of Upper Strathdon; another wed the great chief of Glengarry; and a third was married to Macdonell of Lochgarry.[21]

In the year 1737 Gordon sold Glenbucket, for which he realised twelve thousand marks (about £700); and he left Scotland to visit the Chevalier at Rome. On his way he passed through Paris, where he had an interview with Cardinal Fleury, the French prime minister. To the Cardinal he suggested a scheme of invasion, by which officers and men of the Irish regiments in the French service quartered near the coast could be suddenly and secretly transported to Scotland.[22] The Cardinal, whose general policy was peace at any price,[23] gave no encouragement to the scheme.

In 1737, Gordon sold Glenbucket for twelve thousand marks (about £700) and left Scotland to visit the Chevalier in Rome. On his way, he stopped in Paris, where he met with Cardinal Fleury, the French prime minister. He proposed an invasion plan to the Cardinal, suggesting that officers and men from the Irish regiments in the French service stationed near the coast could be suddenly and secretly transported to Scotland.[22] The Cardinal, who prioritized peace above all else,[23] did not support the plan.

Message to the English Jacobites.

Glenbucket went on to Rome in January 1738: he delivered his message, was rewarded with a major-general’s commission,[24] and returned to Scotland. Immediately the Jacobite Court was filled with sanguine activity. What the terms of Glenbucket’s mission were, or whom he represented, have never been categorically stated. Murray[Pg xxvii] of Broughton hints that he only represented his son-in-law Glengarry and General Alexander Gordon.[25] Even if this limitation were true, it meant much. Glengarry was one of the greatest of Highland chiefs, while General Gordon was that Nestor of Scottish Jacobites who had been commander-in-chief after the Chevalier left Scotland in 1716, and whose opinions must have carried much weight. Although there is no direct statement of the terms of Glenbucket’s mission, its significance can readily be understood from the communication made to the English Jacobites. The Chevalier at once wrote off to Cecil, his official agent in London, informing him of the encouraging news he had received. The zeal of his Scottish subjects, he said, was so strong that he considered it possible to oppose the Scottish Highlanders to the greater part of the troops of the British Government then available, and there was good cause to hope for success even without foreign assistance, provided the English Jacobites acted rightly.[26]

Glenbucket went to Rome in January 1738: he delivered his message, was rewarded with a major-general’s commission, [24] and returned to Scotland. Immediately, the Jacobite Court was buzzing with optimism. The details of Glenbucket’s mission or who he represented have never been clearly stated. Murray[Pg xxvii] of Broughton suggests that he only represented his son-in-law Glengarry and General Alexander Gordon.[25] Even if this limitation were true, it meant a lot. Glengarry was one of the most prominent Highland chiefs, while General Gordon was the veteran of Scottish Jacobites who had been commander-in-chief after the Chevalier left Scotland in 1716, and his views would have carried significant weight. Although there is no direct account of the terms of Glenbucket’s mission, its importance can be easily understood from the message sent to the English Jacobites. The Chevalier immediately wrote to Cecil, his official agent in London, informing him of the encouraging news he had received. The enthusiasm of his Scottish subjects, he said, was so strong that he believed it was possible to pit the Scottish Highlanders against most of the troops of the British Government then available, and there was good reason to hope for success even without foreign help, as long as the English Jacobites acted appropriately.[26]

At the time that the Chevalier’s message reached his adherents there happened to be in England a personage who bore the name and designation of Lord Sempill.[27] Though of Scots descent he was French by birth and residence. He was not familiar with English ways, and he did not understand English political agitation. Mingling for the most part with Jacobites avowed or secret, his ears were filled with execration of the reigning dynasty. On every side he heard the Whig Government denounced,[Pg xxviii] and he saw it tottering and vacillating. He mistook general political dissatisfaction for revolutionary discontent, and he came to the conclusion that the country longed for a restoration of the old royal line. Constituting himself an envoy from the English Jacobites,[28] he hurried off to Rome and reported to the Chevalier that the party was stronger than was generally believed, and that affairs in England were most favourable for action.

At the time the Chevalier's message reached his supporters, there was a figure in England named Lord Sempill. Although of Scottish descent, he was born and raised in France. He wasn't familiar with English customs and didn't understand the political tensions in England. Most of his interactions were with open or secret Jacobites, and he heard criticism directed at the current monarchy all around him. He consistently heard the Whig Government being condemned and saw it struggling and wavering. He confused general political dissatisfaction with revolutionary unrest and concluded that the country was eager for a return of the old royal family. Taking it upon himself to act as a representative for the English Jacobites, he quickly went to Rome and informed the Chevalier that the party was stronger than most people thought and that the situation in England was very favorable for action.

It is necessary here to relate how Glenbucket’s mission to Rome affected the Scottish Jacobites, and to introduce into the narrative the name of one who for five years was a mainstay of the Cause, though in the end he turned traitor.

It’s important to explain how Glenbucket’s mission to Rome impacted the Scottish Jacobites and to mention someone who was a key supporter of the Cause for five years, even though in the end he betrayed them.

Murray of Broughton.

John Murray of Broughton, a younger son of Sir David Murray of Stanhope (a Peeblesshire baronet of ancient family who in his day had been an ardent Jacobite), entered the University of Leyden in 1735, being then twenty years of age. In 1737 he had completed his studies and went on a visit to Rome, where he mixed in the Jacobite society of the place. Although he never had an interview with James himself, he frequently met the young princes, and he acquired the friendship of James Edgar, the Chevalier’s faithful secretary. Murray’s father had once been proposed as an official Jacobite agent in Scotland, and it seems highly probable that Edgar persuaded the son to look forward to assuming such a position. Murray left Rome to return to Scotland shortly before Glenbucket’s arrival in January 1738.

John Murray of Broughton, a younger son of Sir David Murray of Stanhope (a Peeblesshire baronet from an old family who had been a passionate Jacobite in his time), started attending the University of Leyden in 1735, when he was twenty years old. By 1737, he had finished his studies and took a trip to Rome, where he mingled with the local Jacobite community. Although he never met James himself, he often encountered the young princes and became friends with James Edgar, the Chevalier's loyal secretary. Murray's father had been suggested as an official Jacobite agent in Scotland, and it's very likely that Edgar encouraged the son to consider taking on such a role. Murray left Rome to return to Scotland just before Glenbucket's arrival in January 1738.

The Concert of Scots Jacobites.

Glenbucket’s message had convinced James of the devotion of the Highlanders and the Jacobites of north-eastern Scotland, but he wished to know more of the spirit of the Scottish Lowlands. At the same time that he wrote to the English Jacobites, he despatched[Pg xxix] William Hay, a member of his household, to Scotland to make inquiries and to report. Hay overtook Murray who was lingering in Holland, and induced him to accompany him, as he was anxious to be introduced to Murray’s cousin, Lord Kenmure, an ardent Kirkcudbrightshire Jacobite. The acquaintance was duly made, and although no record is yet known of Hay’s actual transactions in Scotland, they can be conjectured with a fair amount of certainty from the results which followed them in spite of Murray’s disparaging remarks on his mission.[29] Hay visited the leading Jacobites, and it is difficult to doubt that he set in motion a scheme for concerted action. What is known is that he returned to Rome after three months’ absence greatly satisfied with what he had found. In the same year, presumably as the outcome of Hay’s mission, an Association of Jacobite leaders was formed, sometimes termed ‘the Concert,’ designed with the object of bringing together Highland chiefs and lowland nobles,[30] pledged to do everything in their power for the restoration of the exiled Stuarts. These Associators, as they were called, were: the Duke of Perth; his uncle, Lord John Drummond; Lord Lovat; Lord Linton, who in 1741 succeeded as fifth Earl of Traquair; his brother, the Hon. John Stuart; Donald Cameron, younger of Lochiel; and his father-in-law, Sir John Campbell of Auchenbreck, an Argyllshire laird. The position of manager was given to William Macgregor (or Drummond), the son of the Perthshire laird of Balhaldies.[31] In contemporary[Pg xxx] documents Macgregor[32] is generally termed ‘Balhaldy,’[33] and that designation has been used in this volume. Murray of Broughton did not belong to the Association, nor was he taken into its confidence until 1741. He, however, attached himself to Colonel Urquhart, the official Jacobite agent, and assisted him with his work. In 1740, when Urquhart was dying of cancer, Murray was appointed to succeed him.

Glenbucket’s message had convinced James of the loyalty of the Highlanders and the Jacobites from northeastern Scotland, but he wanted to learn more about the spirit of the Scottish Lowlands. At the same time he wrote to the English Jacobites, he sent[Pg xxix] William Hay, a member of his household, to Scotland to gather information and report back. Hay met up with Murray, who was hanging out in Holland, and persuaded him to join him, as he was eager to meet Murray’s cousin, Lord Kenmure, a passionate Jacobite from Kirkcudbrightshire. Their introduction happened as planned, and even though there’s no record of Hay’s exact activities in Scotland, we can make educated guesses about them based on the outcomes that followed, despite Murray’s negative comments about his mission.[29] Hay visited the main Jacobites, and it’s hard to believe that he didn’t initiate a coordinated action plan. What we do know is that he returned to Rome after three months, very pleased with what he had discovered. That same year, likely as a result of Hay’s mission, a group of Jacobite leaders was formed, sometimes called ‘the Concert,’ aimed at uniting Highland chiefs and lowland nobles,[30] committed to doing everything they could to restore the exiled Stuarts. These members, known as the Associators, included: the Duke of Perth; his uncle, Lord John Drummond; Lord Lovat; Lord Linton, who became the fifth Earl of Traquair in 1741; his brother, the Hon. John Stuart; Donald Cameron, younger of Lochiel; and his father-in-law, Sir John Campbell of Auchenbreck, a laird from Argyllshire. The role of manager was given to William Macgregor (or Drummond), the son of the Perthshire laird of Balhaldies.[31] In modern[Pg xxx] documents, Macgregor[32] is usually referred to as ‘Balhaldy,’[33] and that name has been used in this volume. Murray of Broughton was not part of the Association and was not brought into the loop until 1741. However, he connected with Colonel Urquhart, the official Jacobite agent, and helped him with his work. In 1740, when Urquhart was dying of cancer, Murray was appointed to take over his position.

In December 1739 Balhaldy was sent by the Associators to Paris, and from thence he went on to Rome. The Chevalier, greatly cheered by what he had to tell, instructed him to return to Paris and there to meet Sempill, who had become one of James’s most trusted agents. Sempill would introduce him to Cardinal Fleury, before whom they would lay the views of both the English and Scottish Jacobites.

In December 1739, the Associators sent Balhaldy to Paris, and from there he traveled on to Rome. The Chevalier, encouraged by what he had to say, told him to go back to Paris and meet Sempill, who had become one of James’s most trusted agents. Sempill would introduce him to Cardinal Fleury, where they would present the views of both the English and Scottish Jacobites.

Balhaldy returned to Paris, made the acquaintance of Sempill, an acquaintance which subsequently ripened into a strong political, perhaps personal, friendship. The interview with Fleury was obtained, and negotiations commenced in the beginning of 1740, about three months after the war with Spain, forced upon Walpole, had broken out.[34]

Balhaldy went back to Paris and got to know Sempill, and their relationship grew into a strong political, and maybe personal, friendship. They managed to have a meeting with Fleury, and negotiations started in early 1740, about three months after the war with Spain, which Walpole was pressured into, had begun.[34]

[Pg xxxi]

[Pg xxxi]

It is no part of my task to follow the intricacies of the negotiations between the French Ministry and the English Jacobites, except when they affect the affairs of the Scots, but here it is necessary to turn back for a moment to relate what took place after the English Jacobites received the Chevalier’s communication of Glenbucket’s message from Scotland.

It’s not my job to keep track of the details of the talks between the French Ministry and the English Jacobites, unless they impact Scottish matters. However, I need to briefly go back and explain what happened after the English Jacobites got the Chevalier’s message from Glenbucket in Scotland.

English reception of Scots Proposals.

Sempill, who had gone from England to Rome in the spring of 1738, was sent back in October with the Chevalier’s instructions to his English adherents to arrange for concerted action with the Scots. The English Jacobites formed a council of six members to serve as a directing nucleus. This council communicated the English views on the Scottish proposal to the Chevalier as follows. Although the Government, they said, had only 29,000 regular troops in the British Isles, of which 13,000 were in England, 12,000 in Ireland, and 4000 in Scotland, yet the rising of the Scots could not take place, as the King hoped, without foreign assistance. It would be a difficult matter to provide the Scots with sufficient arms and munitions, and even if this difficulty could be surmounted, it would take two months after they had been supplied before their army could assemble and establish the royal authority in Scotland; that it would take another month before the Scots could march into England. Meantime the English leaders would be at the mercy of the professional army of the Government which their volunteer followers, entirely ignorant of discipline, could never oppose alone. The principal royalists would be arrested in detail, and their overawed followers would hold back from joining the Scots. There were 13,000 regular soldiers in England. Government would probably transfer 6000 from Ireland, and the army would be further augmented by the importation of Dutch and Hanoverian troops. Probably 8000 men would be sent to the frontier[Pg xxxii] of Scotland. From this they concluded that a rising in Scotland without foreign assistance would involve possible failure and in any case a disastrous civil war, while, on the other hand, the landing of a body of regular troops would provide a rallying point for the insurgents. This force should be equal to the number of troops generally quartered about London and able to hold them, while the volunteer royalists would march straight to the capital which was ready to declare in their favour. They would then acquire the magazines and arsenals at the seat of government, and almost all the treasures of England (‘presque toutes les richesses d’Angleterre’). If at that juncture the Scots would rise, the Hanoverians would be driven to despair. No ally of the Elector, however powerful, would venture to attack Great Britain reunited under her legitimate sovereign. The requirement of the English would be 10,000 to 12,000 regular troops sent from abroad; without such a disciplined force the English Jacobites would not risk a rising.[35]

Sempill, who traveled from England to Rome in the spring of 1738, was sent back in October with instructions from the Chevalier to coordinate actions with the Scots. The English Jacobites formed a council of six members to lead the effort. This council shared the English perspective on the Scottish proposal with the Chevalier as follows: Although the Government had only 29,000 regular troops in the British Isles, with 13,000 in England, 12,000 in Ireland, and 4,000 in Scotland, the Scots' uprising could not happen without foreign assistance, as the King hoped. It would be challenging to provide the Scots with enough arms and munitions, and even if this challenge could be overcome, it would take two months after they received supplies before their army could gather and assert royal authority in Scotland; it would take another month before they could advance into England. Meanwhile, the English leaders would be vulnerable to the professional army of the Government, which their volunteer followers, who lacked any real discipline, would never be able to contend with alone. Key royalists would be arrested one by one, and their intimidated followers would hesitate to join the Scots. There were 13,000 regular soldiers in England. The Government would likely transfer 6,000 from Ireland, and the army would be bolstered by the addition of Dutch and Hanoverian troops. Around 8,000 men would probably be sent to the Scottish frontier. From this, they concluded that an uprising in Scotland without foreign help would likely fail and could lead to a devastating civil war. Conversely, the arrival of a group of regular troops would provide a rallying point for the insurgents. This force should match the number of troops typically stationed around London and be capable of holding their ground, while the volunteer royalists would march straight to the capital, which was ready to support them. They would then take control of the magazines and arsenals at the seat of government, along with nearly all of England’s wealth ('presque toutes les richesses d’Angleterre'). If the Scots were to rise at that moment, the Hanoverians would be left in despair. No ally of the Elector, regardless of how powerful, would dare to attack Great Britain reunited under its legitimate sovereign. The requirement of the English would be 10,000 to 12,000 regular troops to be sent from abroad; without such a disciplined force, the English Jacobites would not risk an uprising.[Pg xxxii]

Sempill was sent by the Chevalier to Paris to lay these views before Cardinal Fleury. The Cardinal, peace lover though he was, felt that it would be absurd to neglect the assistance that the Jacobites might afford him in the complications which were certain to arise when the death of the Emperor Charles VI., then imminent, should occur.[36] When the English views of requirement were presented to him he received them sympathetically; said that the King of France would willingly grant the help the English Jacobites desired, but two things were absolutely necessary: he must have more exact information than had been given him with regard to what royalist adherents[Pg xxxiii] would join his troops on landing, and also as to those who would rise at the same time in the provinces. If the English leaders could satisfy His Majesty on these two points they might expect all they asked for.[37]

Sempill was sent by the Chevalier to Paris to present these ideas to Cardinal Fleury. Although the Cardinal was a lover of peace, he thought it would be foolish to ignore the support the Jacobites could provide him in the complications that were sure to arise after the imminent death of Emperor Charles VI..[36] When the English requirements were shared with him, he responded positively, stating that the King of France would gladly provide the assistance the English Jacobites sought, but two things were absolutely essential: he needed more detailed information than he had received about which royalist supporters[Pg xxxiii] would join his troops upon landing, as well as who would rise up in the provinces at the same time. If the English leaders could provide His Majesty with clarity on these two points, they could expect everything they asked for.[37]

Balhaldy’s interview with Fleury.

Such was the state of Jacobite affairs at the French Court when Sempill introduced Balhaldy to Fleury. I know of no categorical statement of the requirements that Balhaldy was to lay before the Cardinal, but from a memorandum he wrote[38] it may be inferred that the Associators had asked for 1500 men with arms, ammunition, and money. Fleury replied that his sovereign was greatly pleased with the proposals of the Scots, and that he approved of their arrangements on behalf of their legitimate king. France, however, was at peace with Great Britain, while Spain was at open war. King Louis would ask the Spanish Court to undertake an expedition in favour of King James to which he would give efficient support.[39] Shortly afterwards, the Cardinal was obliged to tell Balhaldy that Spain declined to entertain the proposal. The Spanish Court disliked the war with England, and was quite aware that it had been forced on Walpole by the Jacobites and the Opposition.[40] Spain was not going to embarrass the British Government by embarking on a Jacobite adventure.

Such was the situation of Jacobite affairs at the French Court when Sempill introduced Balhaldy to Fleury. I don’t know of any specific statement of what Balhaldy was supposed to present to the Cardinal, but from a note he wrote[38] it can be inferred that the Associators had requested 1500 men along with arms, ammunition, and money. Fleury responded that his king was very pleased with the Scots’ proposals and supported their efforts on behalf of their rightful king. However, France was at peace with Great Britain, while Spain was actively at war. King Louis would ask the Spanish Court to launch an expedition in favor of King James, which he would support effectively.[39] Shortly after, the Cardinal had to inform Balhaldy that Spain refused to consider the proposal. The Spanish Court opposed the war with England and realized it had been forced on Walpole by the Jacobites and the Opposition.[40] Spain didn’t want to complicate matters for the British Government by getting involved in a Jacobite venture.

Fleury then made a proposal that the Spanish Government should finance a scheme by which an army of 10,000 Swedish mercenaries should be engaged to invade Great Britain. While secret negotiation was going on between the French and Spanish Governments, knowledge[Pg xxxiv] of the proposal came to Elizabeth Farnese, Queen of Spain. Elizabeth, fearing that a successful movement for a Stuart restoration would put an end to the war with Great Britain which she strongly favoured, inspired a paragraph in the Amsterdam Gazette, which exploded the design before it could be accomplished.[41]

Fleury then suggested that the Spanish Government should fund a plan to hire 10,000 Swedish mercenaries to invade Great Britain. While secret talks were happening between the French and Spanish Governments, this proposal reached Elizabeth Farnese, Queen of Spain. Elizabeth, worried that a successful effort to restore the Stuarts would end the war with Great Britain—which she strongly supported—inspired a paragraph in the Amsterdam Gazette that blew the plan before it could be carried out.[41]

Driven at last from his hope of using Spain as a catspaw, Fleury informed Balhaldy that his master the King, touched with the zeal of the Scots, would willingly send them all the Irish troops in his service, with the arms, munitions, and the £20,000 asked for to assist the Highlanders.[42]

Driven finally from his hope of using Spain as a pawn, Fleury told Balhaldy that his master, the King, moved by the enthusiasm of the Scots, would gladly send all the Irish troops in his service, along with the weapons, supplies, and the £20,000 requested to help the Highlanders.[42]

Balhaldy hurried back to Scotland with this promise and met the Associators in Edinburgh. Although the Jacobite leaders were disappointed that French troops were not to be sent, they gratefully accepted Fleury’s assurances, and in March 1741 they despatched the following letter to the Cardinal, which was carried back to Paris by Balhaldy.

Balhaldy rushed back to Scotland with this promise and met the Associators in Edinburgh. Even though the Jacobite leaders were let down that French troops wouldn’t be sent, they appreciated Fleury’s assurances, and in March 1741, they sent the following letter to the Cardinal, which Balhaldy took back to Paris.

Lettre de quelques Seigneurs écossais au Cardinal de Fleury.[43]

Monseigneur,—Ayant appris de Monsieur le baron de Balhaldies l’heureux succès des représentations que nous l’avions chargé de faire à Votre Eminence sous le bon plaisir de notre souverain légitime, nous nous hâtons de renvoyer ce baron avec les témoignages de notre vive et respectueuse reconnaissance et avec les assurances les plus solennelles, tant de notre part que de la part de ceux qui se sont engagés avec nous à prendre les armes pour secouer le joug de l’usurpation, que nous sommes prêts à remplir fidèlement tout ce qui a été[Pg xxxv] avancé dans le mémoire que my lord Sempill et ledit sieur baron de Balhaldies eurent l’honneur de remettre, signé de leurs mains, entre celles de Votre Eminence au mois de mai dernier.

Your Honor,—Having learned from Baron de Balhaldies about the successful presentations we asked him to make to Your Eminence under the good favor of our legitimate sovereign, we hurry to send this baron back with our heartfelt and respectful gratitude and with the most solemn assurances, both from us and from those who have joined us in taking up arms to shake off the yoke of usurpation, that we are ready to faithfully fulfill everything that was laid out in the memorandum that my lord Sempill and the aforementioned Baron de Balhaldies had the honor of delivering, signed by their own hands, into Your Excellency's hands last May.

Les chefs de nos tribus des montagnes dont les noms lui ont été remis en même temps avec le nombre d’hommes que chacun d’eux s’est obligé de fournir,[44] persistent inviolablement dans leurs engagements et nous osons répondre à Votre Eminence qu’il y aura vingt mille hommes sur pied pour le service de notre véritable et unique seigneur, le Roi Jacques Huitième d’Ecosse aussitôt qu’il plaira à S.M.T.C. de nous envoyer des armes et des munitions avec les troupes qui sont nécessaires pour conserver ces armes jusqu’à ce que nous puissions nous assembler.

Les chefs de nos tribus des montagnes, dont les noms lui ont été fournis en même temps que le nombre d’hommes que chacun d’eux a promis de fournir, [44] restent fidèles à leurs engagements, et nous avons l’audace de répondre à Votre Éminence qu’il y aura vingt mille hommes prêts à servir notre véritable et unique seigneur, le Roi Jacques VIII d'Écosse, dès que Sa Majesté Très Chaste décidera de nous envoyer des armes et des munitions avec les troupes nécessaires pour garder ces armes jusqu’à ce que nous puissions nous rassembler.

Ces vingt mille hommes pourront si facilement chasser ou détruire les troupes que le gouvernement présent entretient actuellement dans notre pays et même toutes celles qu’on y pourra faire marcher sur les premières alarmes que nous sommes assurément bien fondés d’espérer qu’avec l’assistance divine et sous les auspices du Roi Très Chrétien les fidèles Ecossais seront en état, non seulement de rétablir en très peu de temps l’autorité de leur Roi Légitime dans tout son royaume d’Ecosse et de l’y affermir contre les efforts des partisans d’Hannover, mais aussi de l’aider puissamment au recouvrement de ces autres Etats, ce qui sera d’autant plus facile que nos voisins de l’Angleterre ne sont pas moins fatigués que nous de la tyrannie odieuse sous laquelle nous gémissons tous également et que nous savons qu’ils sont très bien disposés à s’unir avec nous ou avec quelque puissance que ce soit qui voudra leur donner les recours dont ils out besoin pour se remettre sous un gouvernement légitime et naturel. Nous prenons actuellement des mesures pour agir de concert avec eux.

These twenty thousand men will easily be able to chase away or destroy the troops that the current government is maintaining in our country, as well as any others that may be mobilized at the first sign of alarm. We certainly have good reason to hope that, with divine assistance and under the auspices of the Most Christian King, the loyal Scots will not only be able to quickly restore the authority of their rightful King across the whole kingdom of Scotland and secure it against the efforts of the Hanoverian supporters, but also powerfully assist in reclaiming those other territories. This will be all the easier since our neighbors in England are just as tired as we are of the vile tyranny under which we all suffer equally, and we know they are very much inclined to unite with us or any power willing to provide the support they need to return to a legitimate and natural government. We are currently taking steps to act in concert with them.

Quant au secours qui est nécessaire pour l’Ecosse en particulier, nous aurions souhaité que S.M.T.C. eût bien voulu nous accorder des troupes françaises qui eussent renouvelé parmi nous les leçons d’une valeur héroïque et d’une fidélité incorruptible que nos ancêtres ont tant de fois apprises dans la France même; mais puisque V.E. juge à propos de nous envoyer de sujets de notre Roi, nous les recevrons avec joie comme venant de sa part, et nous tâcherons de leur faire sentir[Pg xxxvi] le cas que nous faisons et de leur attachement à notre souverain légitime et de l’honneur qu’ils out acquis en marchant si longtemps sur les traces des meilleurs sujets et des plus braves troupes en l’Univers.

As for the help needed for Scotland in particular, we would have liked His Majesty to have granted us French troops who would have brought back the lessons of heroic value and unshakeable loyalty that our ancestors learned many times in France itself; but since Your Excellency deems it appropriate to send us subjects of our King, we will gladly receive them as coming from him, and we will strive to make them feel how much we value their attachment to our legitimate sovereign and the honor they have earned by following in the footsteps of the best subjects and bravest troops in the world.

Monsieur le baron de Balhaldies connaît si parfaitement notre situation, les opérations que nous avons concertées, et tout ce qui nous regarde, qu’il serait inutile d’entrer ici dans aucun détail. Nous supplions V.E. de vouloir bien l’écouter favorablement et d’être persuadée qu’il aura l’honneur de lui tout rapporter dans la plus exacte vérité.

Monsieur le baron de Balhaldies knows our situation, the plans we’ve made, and everything concerning us so well that it would be pointless to go into any details here. We urge Your Excellency to kindly listen to him favorably and to be assured that he will honorably report everything to you with the utmost accuracy.

Si les ministres du gouvernement étaient moins jaloux de nos démarches ou moins vigilants, nous engagerions volontiers tous nos biens pour fournir aux frais de cette expédition; mais nuls contrats n’étant valables, suivant nos usages, sans être inscrits sur les registres publics, il nous est impossible de lever une somme tant soit peu considérable avec le secret qui convient dans les circonstances présentes. C’est uniquement cette considération qui nous empêche de faire un fond pour les dépenses nécessaires, [ce qui serait une preuve ultérieure que nous donnerions avec joie de notre zèle et de la confiance avec laquelle nous nous rangeons sous l’étendard de notre Roi naturel; mais le bien du service nous oblige de nous contenir et] d’avoir recours à la générosité de S.M.T.C. jusqu’à ce que l’on puisse lever les droits royaux dans notre pays d’une manière régulière.

If the government ministers were less jealous of our efforts or less cautious, we would gladly invest all our assets to cover the costs of this mission; however, since no contracts are valid, according to our customs, without being recorded in public registers, it is impossible for us to raise any significant amount discreetly given the current circumstances. It is solely this consideration that prevents us from setting up a fund for the necessary expenses, [which would be further proof that we would joyfully demonstrate our enthusiasm and the trust with which we align ourselves under the banner of our rightful King; but the good of the service requires us to restrain ourselves and] to rely on the generosity of Your Majesty until we can collect the royal dues in our country in an orderly manner.

Nous sommes persuadés que l’on pourra y parvenir dans l’espace de trois mois après l’arrivée des troupes irlandaises et nous ne doutons point que notre patrie, réunie alors sous le gouvernement de son Roi tant désiré ne fasse des efforts qui donneront lieu à V.E. de prouver à S.M.T.C. que les Ecossais modernes sont les vrais descendants de ceux qui ont eu l’honneur d’être comptés pendant tant de siècles les plus fidèles alliés des Rois, ses prédécesseurs.

Nous sommes convaincus que nous pourrons y arriver dans les trois mois suivant l'arrivée des troupes irlandaises, et nous ne doutons pas que notre patrie, alors unie sous le gouvernement de son Roi tant désiré, fera des efforts qui permettront à V.E. de prouver à S.M.T.C. que les Écossais modernes sont les véritables descendants de ceux qui ont eu l'honneur d'être considérés pendant tant de siècles comme les plus fidèles alliés des Rois, ses prédécesseurs.

Nous sommes bien sensiblement touchés des mouvements que V.E. s’est donnés et qu’elle veut bien continuer pour faire entendre au Roi Catholique les avantages qu’il y aurait à agir en faveur du Roi notre maître dans la conjoncture présente. Nous avions cru que ces avantages ne pouvaient échapper aux ministres Espagnols; mais quelque travers qu’ils prennent dans la conduite de cette guerre, V.E. prend une part qui ne saura manquer de les en tirer heureusement et de frustrer l’attente injuste des nations qui sont prêtes à fondre sur les trésors du nouveau monde.

Nous sommes très touchés par les efforts que V.E. a déployés et qu'elle continue de faire pour montrer au Roi Catholique les bénéfices qu’il y aurait à agir en faveur de notre roi dans la situation actuelle. Nous avions pensé que ces avantages ne pouvaient pas échapper aux ministres espagnols ; mais peu importe la façon dont ils gèrent cette guerre, V.E. joue un rôle qui doit les en sortir favorablement et décevoir les attentes injustes des nations prêtes à s'emparer des richesses du nouveau monde.

[Pg xxxvii]

[Pg xxxvii]

Nous en louons Dieu, Monseigneur, et nous le prions avec ferveur de vouloir bien conserver V.E. non seulement pour l’accomplissement du grand ouvrage que nous allons entreprendre sous sa protection mais aussi pour en voir les grands et heureux effets dans toute l’Europe aussi bien que dans les trois royaumes britanniques, auxquels son nom ne sera pas moins précieux dans tous les temps à venir qu’à la France même qui a pris de si beaux accroissements sous son ministère et dont la gloire va être élevée jusqu’au comble en faisant vigorer la justice chez ses voisins. Nous avons l’honneur d’être avec une profonde vénération et un parfait dévouement, Monseigneur, de votre Eminence, les très humbles et très obéissants serviteurs,

We praise God, Your Excellency, and we fervently pray that He will preserve you, not only for the great work we are about to undertake under His protection but also to witness its significant and positive effects throughout Europe as well as in the three British kingdoms, where your name will be held in just as much esteem in all future times as it is in France, which has experienced such beautiful growth under your leadership and whose glory will be elevated to the highest peak by strengthening justice among its neighbors. We have the honor to be, with deep respect and complete devotion, Your Eminence's very humble and obedient servants,

  • The Duke of Perth
  • Lord Jean Drumond de Perth
  • Lord Lovat
  • Lord Linton
  • Cameron, Baron of Locheil
  • Sir Campbell D'Achinbreck
  • M’Grieger, Baron of Balhaldies.

à Edimbourg, ce 13ème Mars 1741.

in Edinburgh, this 13th of March 1741.

[Translation.]

[Translation.]

Having learned from the Baron of Balhaldies of the happy success of the representations that we had instructed him to make to Your Eminence, with the approval of our legitimate Sovereign, we now hasten to send this Baron back with the proofs of our lively and respectful gratitude, and with the most solemn undertaking, both by ourselves and by those who are engaged along with us, to take up arms to throw off the yoke of the usurpation, that we are ready to fulfil faithfully all that was put forward in the Memorial, which my lord Sempill and the said Baron of Balhaldies signed with their own hands, and had the honour to place in the hands of Your Eminence last May.

Having heard from the Baron of Balhaldies about the successful presentations we asked him to make to Your Eminence, with the backing of our rightful Sovereign, we are now eager to send this Baron back with our heartfelt and respectful gratitude. We also make our most serious commitment, both personally and on behalf of our associates, to take up arms to rid ourselves of the usurpation. We are ready to faithfully carry out everything proposed in the Memorial that my lord Sempill and the Baron of Balhaldies signed and presented to Your Eminence last May.

The chiefs of our Highland clans, whose names we have sent at the same time with the number of men that each binds himself to furnish, will without fail keep their engagements, and we venture to be responsible to Your Eminence that there will be 20,000 men on foot for the service of our true and only lord, King James VIII. of Scotland, as soon as it will please His Most Christian Majesty to send us arms and munitions, and the troops that are necessary to guard those arms until we shall be able to assemble.

The leaders of our Highland clans, whose names we've sent along with the number of men each has promised to provide, will definitely honor their commitments. We assure Your Eminence that there will be 20,000 men ready to serve our true and only lord, King James VIII. of Scotland, as soon as His Most Christian Majesty is able to send us arms and supplies, along with the troops needed to protect those arms until we can gather.

These 20,000 men will be able so easily to defeat or to destroy the troops that the Government employs at present in our country, and even all those that it may be able to despatch upon the first alarm, so[Pg xxxviii] that we feel entirely justified in hoping that with divine assistance and under the auspices of the most Christian King, the loyal Scots will be in a condition, not only in a short time to re-establish the authority of their legitimate King throughout the whole Kingdom of Scotland, and to sustain him there against the efforts of the partisans of Hanover, but also to aid powerfully in the recovery of these other States, which will be all the easier since our neighbours of England are not less wearied than we are of the odious tyranny under which we all equally groan; and we know that they are thoroughly determined to unite with us, and with any power whatever that would give them the opportunity they require to place themselves once more under a legitimate and natural Government. We are at present taking measures to act along with them.

These 20,000 men will easily defeat or destroy the troops that the Government currently has in our country, and even any reinforcements it might send out at the first sign of trouble, so[Pg xxxviii] we feel completely justified in hoping that with divine help and under the guidance of the most Christian King, the loyal Scots will soon be able to re-establish the authority of their legitimate King across the entire Kingdom of Scotland, and to support him against the efforts of the Hanoverian supporters. They will also be able to significantly help in recovering other states, which will be much easier since our neighbors in England are just as tired as we are of the awful tyranny we all suffer under; we know they are fully committed to joining us, and with any power that would give them the chance to return to a legitimate and natural Government. We are currently taking steps to collaborate with them.

As to the assistance that is necessary for Scotland in particular, we should have preferred that His Most Christian Majesty might have been willing to grant us French troops, who would have renewed among us the lessons of heroic bravery and incorruptible fidelity, that our ancestors have so often learned in France itself, but since Your Eminence thinks fit to send subjects of our King, we will receive them with joy as coming from him, and we will endeavour to make them feel the value that we attach to their devotion to our legitimate Sovereign, and the honour that they have acquired in treading so long in the footsteps of the best subjects and of the bravest troops in the Universe.

Regarding the help that Scotland specifically needs, we would have preferred that His Most Christian Majesty was willing to provide us with French troops, who would have reminded us of the lessons of heroic bravery and unwavering loyalty that our ancestors learned so often in France itself. However, since Your Eminence has decided to send subjects of our King, we will welcome them joyfully as coming from him, and we will strive to make them appreciate the value we place on their loyalty to our rightful Sovereign and the honor they have earned by following in the footsteps of the best subjects and the bravest troops in the world.

The Baron of Balhaldies knows so perfectly our situation, the plans that we have concerted, and everything that affects us, that it will be unnecessary to enter into any detail. We implore Your Eminence to listen to him favourably, and to be assured that he will have the honour of reporting to you with the utmost accuracy.

The Baron of Balhaldies is fully aware of our situation, the plans we've made, and everything that concerns us, so there’s no need to go into detail. We ask Your Eminence to consider him kindly and to know that he will report to you with complete accuracy.

If the ministers of the Government were only less suspicious of our actions or less watchful, we would willingly pledge all our belongings to defray the cost of this expedition, but as no contracts (of loan or sale) are binding by our customs unless they have been inscribed in the public registers, it is not possible for us to raise a sum that would be sufficient, with the necessary secrecy that present circumstances require. It is this consideration alone that prevents us from raising a fund for the necessary expense, the raising of which would bear further proof of our zeal, which we should give with pleasure, and of the confidence with which we place ourselves under the standard of our natural King; but the good of the service obliges us to restrain our wishes and to have recourse to the generosity of His Most Christian Majesty until it is possible to establish the royal rights in our country in a regular manner.

If the government ministers were just a little less suspicious of our actions or less vigilant, we would gladly pledge all our belongings to cover the costs of this expedition. However, since no contracts (for loans or sales) are valid according to our customs unless they are recorded in the public registers, we can't raise enough money with the level of secrecy needed in the current situation. This concern is the only thing stopping us from gathering the funds for the necessary expenses, which would further demonstrate our commitment—something we would happily show—and the trust we place under the banner of our rightful King. But for the sake of the service, we must hold back our desires and turn to the generosity of His Most Christian Majesty until we can properly establish royal rights in our country.

We are persuaded that it would be possible to accomplish this three months after the arrival of the Irish troops, and we do not doubt that our country, reunited under the Government of its king, so much desired, would make such efforts as would enable Your Excellency to prove to His Most Christian Majesty that the modern Scots are the true[Pg xxxix] descendants of those who have had the honour of being counted during so many centuries the most faithful allies of the kings, his predecessors.

We believe that it will be possible to achieve this three months after the Irish troops arrive, and we have no doubt that our country, reunited under its desired king's government, would make the efforts needed for Your Excellency to demonstrate to His Most Christian Majesty that modern Scots are the true[Pg xxxix] descendants of those who have proudly been recognized as the most loyal allies of his predecessors for many centuries.

We are very sensibly touched by what Your Eminence has done, and will continue to do, to make the Catholic king understand the advantages that he would have in acting in favour of the King our master in the present juncture. We had believed that these advantages could not escape the notice of the Spanish Ministers, but whatever strange things they may have done in the conduct of this war, your Eminence is now acting in such a way as cannot fail happily to extricate them from the consequences of their mistakes, and to frustrate the unjust attitude of those nations who are ready to fall upon the treasures of the new world.

We are truly impressed by what Your Eminence has done and will keep doing to help the Catholic king see the benefits of supporting our master, especially at this critical time. We had thought the Spanish Ministers could not overlook these benefits, but regardless of the odd decisions they've made during this war, your Eminence is now taking actions that will surely help them recover from their mistakes and counter the unjust stance of those nations eager to seize the treasures of the New World.

We praise God, Monseigneur, and we pray with fervour that He would preserve Your Eminence, not only for the accomplishment of the great work which we are going to undertake under your protection, but also that you may see the great and happy effects throughout Europe as well as in the three kingdoms of Britain in which your name will be not less precious in all time to come than in France itself, which has been enlarged so remarkably under your ministry; and that the glory of your name will be raised to the highest pitch by making justice flourish among your neighbours. We have the Honour to be, with profound veneration and perfect devotion, Monseigneur, Your Eminence’s very humble and obedient servants.

We thank God, Your Eminence, and we wholeheartedly pray that He keeps you safe, not only for the significant work we are about to undertake under your guidance, but also so that you can witness the great and positive impacts across Europe, as well as in the three kingdoms of Britain, where your name will be cherished forever, just as it is in France, which has expanded so remarkably under your leadership. We believe that the glory of your name will shine even brighter by promoting justice among your neighbors. It is our honor, with deep respect and complete devotion, to be Your Eminence's very humble and obedient servants.

The promises of assistance from the French Court brought by Balhaldy, and the letter of acceptance by the lords of the Concert constituted the treaty between France and the Scottish Jacobites which formed the foundation of all subsequent schemes undertaken in Scotland. Even in the end it was detachments of the Irish regiments, whose use was originally suggested by Glenbucket, together with a Scottish regiment raised later than this by Lord John Drummond, that formed the meagre support that was actually sent over from France in 1745.

The promises of help from the French Court brought by Balhaldy, and the letter of acceptance from the lords of the Concert, made up the treaty between France and the Scottish Jacobites, which laid the groundwork for all the plans that followed in Scotland. Even in the end, it was groups from the Irish regiments, whose use was first suggested by Glenbucket, along with a Scottish regiment raised later by Lord John Drummond, that made up the limited support actually sent from France in 1745.

Balhaldy returned to France almost immediately, and in the winter of 1740-41, he went to England where he met the Jacobite leaders, of whom he particularly mentions the Earls of Orrery and Barrymore, Sir Watkin Williams Wynne, and Sir John Hinde Cotton. With them he endeavoured to form a scheme of concert between the[Pg xl] English and the Scottish Jacobites, but without much success.[45]

Balhaldy returned to France almost right away, and in the winter of 1740-41, he went to England where he met with the Jacobite leaders, especially mentioning the Earls of Orrery and Barrymore, Sir Watkin Williams Wynne, and Sir John Hinde Cotton. He tried to create a plan for cooperation between the[Pg xl] English and the Scottish Jacobites, but it didn't work out very well.[45]

Murray taken into the confidence of the Concert.

It was not until after the signing of the letter to Fleury that Murray was taken into the confidence of the Jacobite leaders, and it was at this time that he first met Lord Lovat. This was also the occasion of his first meeting with Balhaldy; their relations at this time were quite friendly; Balhaldy handed over to Murray the negotiation of a delicate ecclesiastical matter with which he had been entrusted by the Chevalier.[46]

It wasn't until after signing the letter to Fleury that Murray was brought into the confidence of the Jacobite leaders, and it was then that he first met Lord Lovat. This was also the first time he met Balhaldy; their relationship was quite friendly at that point. Balhaldy turned over to Murray the negotiation of a delicate church issue that he had been tasked with by the Chevalier.[46]

Another early duty was to raise money for the Cause, but to Murray’s mortification, he had to give up the scheme of a loan, because all the sympathisers to whom he applied declined to subscribe; not, they said, because they objected to giving their money, but each and all refused to be the first to compromise himself by heading the subscription list. At this time Murray was not permitted to undertake any active propaganda for a rising, as the associated leaders feared that by increasing the numbers in the secret there would be too great danger of leakage. The Associators preferred to keep such work in their own hands, and each of them had a district assigned to him.

Another early responsibility was to raise funds for the Cause, but to Murray’s embarrassment, he had to abandon the idea of a loan because everyone he approached refused to contribute. They said it wasn’t that they didn’t want to give their money; they simply didn’t want to be the first one to put their name on the subscription list. At this time, Murray wasn’t allowed to engage in any active campaigning for a rising, as the other leaders feared that increasing the number of people in the loop would heighten the risk of leaks. The Associators preferred to handle this work themselves, and each was assigned a specific district.

After Balhaldy’s departure the unfortunate Associators were kept in a state of agonising suspense, for nothing was heard from France until the end of 1742. In December of that year, Lord Traquair received a letter from Balhaldy couched in vague terms, assuring him that troops and all things necessary for a rising would be embarked early in the spring. The scheme, he wrote, was to make a landing near Aberdeen and another in Kintyre. The whole tone of the letter was so confident that the Associators[Pg xli] felt that a French expedition might be expected almost immediately, and they were profoundly conscious that Scotland was not ready. So alarmed were the leaders at the possibility of a premature landing, and so uncertain were they about the promises vaguely conveyed in Balhaldy’s letter, that they determined to send Murray over to Paris to find out what the actual French promises were, and how they were to be performed; and moreover to warn the Government of King Louis how matters stood in Scotland.

After Balhaldy left, the unfortunate Associators were left in a state of agonizing suspense, as they didn’t hear anything from France until the end of 1742. In December of that year, Lord Traquair received a letter from Balhaldy that was vague, assuring him that troops and everything needed for a uprising would be sent off early in the spring. The plan, he wrote, was to land near Aberdeen and another in Kintyre. The overall tone of the letter was so confident that the Associators[Pg xli] felt a French expedition might arrive almost immediately, and they were acutely aware that Scotland wasn’t ready. The leaders were so alarmed by the possibility of an early landing and so uncertain about the promises vaguely outlined in Balhaldy’s letter that they decided to send Murray to Paris to find out what the actual French promises were and how they would be carried out; and also to warn King Louis’s Government about the situation in Scotland.

Murray set off in January 1743. On his way he visited the Duke of Perth, then residing at York, making what friends he could among the English Jacobites. When Murray got to London, he was informed of Cardinal Fleury’s death,[47] which somewhat staggered him, but he determined to go on to France to find out how matters stood.

Murray set out in January 1743. On his way, he visited the Duke of Perth, who was living in York, making friends with as many English Jacobites as he could. When he reached London, he learned about Cardinal Fleury’s death, [47] which surprised him a bit, but he decided to continue on to France to see how things were.

Murray’s visit to Paris, 1743.

On arriving in Paris, Murray met Balhaldy and Sempill. Balhaldy was surprised and not particularly glad to see him, but he treated him courteously, and discussing affairs with Murray, he patronisingly informed him that he had not been told everything. Sempill was very polite. He told Murray that a scheme had been prepared by Fleury, but that the Cardinal’s illness and death had interrupted it.[48] Sempill also told him that luckily he had persuaded the Cardinal to impart his schemes to Monsieur Amelot, the Minister for Foreign Affairs. An interview with the Minister was obtained at Versailles, and on Murray’s explaining the reason of his visit, Amelot frankly told him[Pg xlii] that the King of France had full confidence in the Scots, but that nothing could be done without co-operation with the English. He further warned the Scotsmen that an enterprise such as they proposed was dangerous and precarious. The King, he said, was quite willing to send ten thousand troops to help James his master, but the Jacobites must take care not to bring ruin on the Cause by a rash attempt. Murray was startled at Amelot’s answer after the assurances he had had from Sempill and Balhaldy of the minister’s keenness to help; he was further distressed that some arrangements, which Sempill had confidently mentioned to him as being made, were unknown to Amelot, while the minister owned that he had not read the Memorials, but promised to look into them.

Upon arriving in Paris, Murray met Balhaldy and Sempill. Balhaldy was surprised and not particularly happy to see him, but he treated him politely and, while discussing matters with Murray, condescendingly informed him that he hadn’t been told everything. Sempill was very courteous. He let Murray know that a plan had been prepared by Fleury, but that the Cardinal’s illness and death had interrupted it. Sempill also mentioned that fortunately he had convinced the Cardinal to share his plans with Monsieur Amelot, the Minister for Foreign Affairs. An interview with the Minister was arranged at Versailles, and when Murray explained the reason for his visit, Amelot candidly told him that the King of France had complete trust in the Scots, but that nothing could be done without collaboration with the English. He further warned the Scotsmen that an undertaking like theirs was risky and uncertain. The King, he said, was quite willing to send ten thousand troops to support James, but the Jacobites needed to be cautious not to jeopardize the Cause with a hasty attempt. Murray was taken aback by Amelot’s response after the reassurances he had received from Sempill and Balhaldy about the minister’s eagerness to help; he was even more troubled that some arrangements Sempill had confidently mentioned were unknown to Amelot, while the minister admitted that he hadn’t read the memorials but promised to look into them.

It was on this occasion that Murray first became suspicious of the behaviour of Balhaldy and Sempill, a state of mind which grew later to absolute frenzy. When arranging for the interview with Amelot, they hinted very plainly to Murray that he must exaggerate any accounts he gave of preparations in Scotland. He came to the conclusion that they were deceiving the French minister by overstating Jacobite prospects at home, and after the interview he was further persuaded that Balhaldy and Sempill were similarly deceiving the Jacobite leaders with exaggerated accounts of French promises. He was further mortified to find that the Earl Marischal, who was much respected in Scotland, and to whom the Jacobite Scotsmen looked as their leader in any rising, would have nothing to do with Sempill and Balhaldy; while, on their part, they described the earl as a wrong-headed man, continually setting himself in opposition to his master and those employed by him, and applied to him the epithet of ‘honourable fool.’

It was during this time that Murray first started to doubt the behavior of Balhaldy and Sempill, a feeling that later escalated into complete frenzy. When arranging the meeting with Amelot, they clearly implied to Murray that he needed to exaggerate any information he provided about preparations in Scotland. He concluded that they were misleading the French minister by overstating Jacobite prospects at home, and after the meeting, he became even more convinced that Balhaldy and Sempill were also deceiving the Jacobite leaders with inflated accounts of French promises. He was further disheartened to discover that the Earl Marischal, who was highly respected in Scotland and whom the Jacobite Scotsmen saw as their leader in any uprising, wanted nothing to do with Sempill and Balhaldy. They, in turn, referred to the earl as a misguided man who was always opposing his master and those working for him, and they called him an ‘honourable fool.’

Apparently about this time the preparations of the English Jacobites were languishing, and Balhaldy, proud[Pg xliii] of the Scottish Association which he looked upon as his own creation, volunteered to go over to England and arrange a similar Concert among the English leaders. He and Murray went to London together, and there Murray took the opportunity of privately seeing Cecil, the Jacobite agent for England. Cecil explained his difficulties, told him of the dissensions among the English Jacobites, and of their complaints about Sempill, who, he considered, was being imposed upon by the French Ministry. It is characteristic of Jacobite plotting to find that Murray concealed, on the one side, his interviews with Cecil from Balhaldy, and, on the other, he kept it a secret from Cecil that he had ever been in France.[49] Disappointed with his mission both in France and England, Murray returned to Edinburgh in March or April.

At this time, the efforts of the English Jacobites were stumbling, and Balhaldy, proud of the Scottish Association he considered his own creation, offered to go to England and set up a similar gathering among the English leaders. He and Murray traveled to London together, where Murray took the chance to meet privately with Cecil, the Jacobite agent for England. Cecil explained his challenges and discussed the disagreements among the English Jacobites, as well as their grievances concerning Sempill, whom he believed was being taken advantage of by the French Ministry. It’s typical of Jacobite schemes that Murray kept his meetings with Cecil hidden from Balhaldy while also not revealing to Cecil that he had ever been in France. Disappointed with his efforts in both France and England, Murray returned to Edinburgh in March or April.

Butler’s mission to England.

Meanwhile, Balhaldy was busy getting pledges in England and making lists of Jacobite adherents avowed and secret. Though they said they were willing to rise, he found they absolutely refused to give any pledge in writing, and he suggested, through Sempill, that the French minister should send over a man he could trust to see the state of matters for himself. Amelot selected an equerry of King Louis’s of the name of Butler, an Englishman by birth. Under pretence of purchasing horses, Butler visited racecourses in England, where he had the opportunity of meeting country gentlemen, and was astonished to find that at Lichfield, where he met three hundred lords and gentlemen, of whom, he said, the poorest possessed £3000 a year, he found only one who was not opposed to the Government. On his return to France, Butler sent in a long report on the possibilities of an English rising. He told the French Government that after going through part of England, a document had been placed in his hands giving an account of the whole country,[Pg xliv] from which it appeared that three-quarters of the well-to-do (‘qui avaient les biens-fonds’) were zealous adherents of their legitimate king, and that he had been enabled to verify this statement through men who could be trusted, some of whom indeed were partisans of the Government. He was amazed that the Government was able to exist at all where it was so generally hated. The secret, he said, was that all positions of authority—the army, the navy, the revenue offices—were in the hands of their mercenary partisans. The English noblesse were untrained to war, and a very small body of regular soldiers could easily crush large numbers of men unused to discipline. It would be necessary then to have a force of regular troops from abroad to make head against those of the Government.

Meanwhile, Balhaldy was busy gathering commitments in England and making lists of both open and secret Jacobite supporters. Although they claimed they were willing to rise up, he found that they flatly refused to provide any written vows. He suggested, through Sempill, that the French minister should send someone trustworthy to assess the situation personally. Amelot chose Butler, an Englishman and an equerry to King Louis. Under the guise of buying horses, Butler visited racecourses in England, where he had the chance to meet local gentlemen. He was shocked to discover that at Lichfield, where he encountered three hundred lords and gentlemen, he found only one who did not oppose the Government, and the poorest among them had an income of £3,000 a year. Upon his return to France, Butler submitted a detailed report on the potential for an English uprising. He informed the French Government that after traveling through parts of England, he had received a document summarizing the whole country, from which it seemed that three-quarters of the wealthy landowners were enthusiastic supporters of their legitimate king. He was able to confirm this through reliable individuals, some of whom were actually government supporters. He was surprised that the Government could survive at all given the widespread animosity toward it. He noted that the secret was that all positions of authority—the army, the navy, the revenue offices—were held by their mercenary supporters. The English nobility were untrained in warfare, and even a small number of regular soldiers could easily overpower large groups of undisciplined men. Therefore, it would be necessary to have a force of regular troops from abroad to confront the Government's forces.

French determine on an Invasion.
Letter of Louis XV. to Philip V.

Butler and Balhaldy returned to France in October. During their absence things had changed; the battle of Dettingen had been fought (June 27th, 1743), although Great Britain and France were technically at peace. King Louis was furious, and he took the matter up personally, and gave instructions to prepare an expeditionary force for the invasion of England. The main body was to consist of sixteen battalions of infantry and one regiment of dismounted dragoons, under Marshal Saxe, and was to land in the Thames. It was further suggested that two or three battalions should be sent to Scotland. Prince Charles Edward was invited to accompany the expedition, and was secretly brought from Rome, arriving in Paris at the end of January 1744. There was no affectation of altruism for the Stuart exile in King Louis’s mind, but the zeal of the Jacobites was to be exploited. He wrote his private views to his uncle, the King of Spain, communicating a project that he had formed, he said, in great secrecy, which was to destroy at one blow the foundations of the league of the enemies of the House of Bourbon. It might, perhaps, be hazardous, but from all that he could learn it[Pg xlv] was likely to be successful. He wished to act in concert with Spain. He sent a plan of campaign. Everything was ready for execution, and he proposed to begin the expedition on the 1st of January. It would be a very good thing that the British minister should see that the barrier of the sea did not entirely protect England from French enterprise.[50] It might be that the revolution to be promoted by the expedition would not be so quick as was expected, but in any case there would be a civil war which would necessitate the recall of the English troops in the Netherlands. The Courts of Vienna and Turin would no longer receive English subsidies, and these Courts, left to their own resources, would submit to terms provided they were not too rigorous.[51]

Butler and Balhaldy returned to France in October. While they had been away, things had changed; the battle of Dettingen had been fought (June 27th, 1743), even though Great Britain and France were technically at peace. King Louis was furious, and he took the matter into his own hands, giving orders to prepare an expeditionary force to invade England. The main contingent was to include sixteen battalions of infantry and one regiment of dismounted dragoons, led by Marshal Saxe, and was scheduled to land in the Thames. There was also a suggestion to send two or three battalions to Scotland. Prince Charles Edward was invited to join the expedition and was secretly brought from Rome, arriving in Paris at the end of January 1744. King Louis had no genuine concern for the Stuart exile; he wanted to capitalize on the enthusiasm of the Jacobites. He shared his private thoughts with his uncle, the King of Spain, outlining a plan he claimed to have developed in secrecy, aimed at striking a decisive blow against the enemies of the House of Bourbon. It might be risky, but from what he gathered, it was likely to succeed. He wanted to work alongside Spain. He sent a campaign plan. Everything was set for execution, and he aimed to start the expedition on January 1st. It was important for the British minister to realize that the sea wouldn’t fully shield England from French action. While the revolution the expedition aimed to instigate might not unfold as quickly as hoped, it would certainly lead to a civil war, which would require the recall of English troops from the Netherlands. The Courts of Vienna and Turin would no longer receive English aid, and left to their own devices, they would accept terms as long as they weren't too harsh.

Collapse of French Expedition.

The story of the collapse of the proposed invasion is too well known to need description. Ten thousand troops were on board ship. Marshal Saxe and Prince Charles were ready to embark. On the night of the 6th of March a terrible storm arose which lasted some days. The protecting men-of-war were dispersed, many of the transports were sunk, a British fleet appeared in the Channel, and Saxe was ordered to tell the Prince first that the enterprise was postponed, and later that it was abandoned. Charles, nearly broken-hearted, remained on in France, living in great privacy, and hoping against hope that the French would renew their preparations. For a time he remained at Gravelines, where Lord Marischal was with him. He longed for action, and implored the earl to urge the French to renew the expedition to England, but Marischal only suggested difficulties. Charles proposed an expedition to Scotland, but his lordship said it would mean destruction. Then he desired to make a campaign with the French army, but Lord Marischal said it would only disgust the English.[Pg xlvi] Charles removed to Montmartre, near Paris, but he was ordered to maintain the strictest incognito. He asked to see King Louis, but he was refused any audience. His old tutor, Sir Thomas Sheridan, was sent from Rome to be with him; also George Kelly, Atterbury’s old secretary, who, since his escape from the Tower, had been living at Avignon. He took as his confessor a Cordelier friar of the name Kelly, a relative of the Protestant George Kelly, and, sad to say, a sorry drunkard, whose example did Charles no good. These Irish companions soon quarrelled with Balhaldy and Sempill, who wrote to the Chevalier complaining of their evil influence, while the Irishmen also wrote denouncing Balhaldy and Sempill.

The story of the failed invasion is so well known that it hardly needs explaining. Ten thousand troops were on board ships. Marshal Saxe and Prince Charles were ready to set sail. On the night of March 6th, a terrible storm hit that lasted for several days. The navy ships were scattered, many of the transport vessels sank, a British fleet appeared in the Channel, and Saxe was instructed to inform the Prince first that the operation was postponed, and later that it was canceled. Charles, nearly heartbroken, stayed in France, living in extreme privacy and holding out hope that the French would resume their preparations. For a while, he stayed in Gravelines, where Lord Marischal was with him. He longed for action and urged the earl to encourage the French to restart the expedition to England, but Marischal only pointed out problems. Charles suggested an expedition to Scotland, but his lordship said it would lead to disaster. Then he wanted to campaign with the French army, but Lord Marischal said it would just turn the English against him. Charles moved to Montmartre, near Paris, but he was ordered to keep a low profile. He requested to see King Louis, but was denied any audience. His former tutor, Sir Thomas Sheridan, was sent from Rome to be with him, along with George Kelly, Atterbury's old secretary, who had been living in Avignon since escaping from the Tower. He chose a Cordelier friar named Kelly, a relative of the Protestant George Kelly, as his confessor, unfortunately, a heavy drinker, whose influence did Charles no favors. These Irish companions quickly clashed with Balhaldy and Sempill, who wrote to the Chevalier complaining about their negative influence, while the Irishmen also wrote denouncing Balhaldy and Sempill.[Pg xlvi]

Charles left Montmartre. His cousin, the Bishop of Soissons, son of the Marshal Duke of Berwick, kindly lent him his Château Fitzjames, a house seven posts from Paris on the Calais road, where he remained for a time. Another cousin, the Duke of Bouillon, a nephew of his mother, also was very kind, and entertained him at Navarre, a château near Evreux in Normandy. But his life was full of weary days. He could get nothing from the French, and ‘our friends in England,’ he wrote to his father, are ‘afraid of their own shadow, and think of little else than of diverting themselves.’ Things seemed very hopeless: the Scots alone remained faithful.

Charles left Montmartre. His cousin, the Bishop of Soissons, son of the Marshal Duke of Berwick, generously offered him his Château Fitzjames, a house located seven posts from Paris on the Calais road, where he stayed for a while. Another cousin, the Duke of Bouillon, his mother's nephew, was also very kind and hosted him at Navarre, a château near Évreux in Normandy. But his life was filled with exhausting days. He couldn't get any support from the French, and he wrote to his father that "our friends in England" were "afraid of their own shadow and only think about having fun." Things seemed really hopeless: only the Scots remained loyal.

Suspense in Scotland.

From the time that Murray left London in the spring of 1743, the Jacobite Associators had received no letters from Balhaldy. The suspense was very trying; indeed Lord Lovat felt for a time so hopeless that he proposed to retire with his son to France and end his days in a religious house.[52] Lovat’s spirits seem to have risen shortly after this owing to some success he had in persuading his neighbours to join the Cause, and he eventually resolved to remain in Scotland. It was only from the newspapers[Pg xlvii] the Jacobite leaders knew of the French preparations, but towards the end of December a letter was received from Balhaldy, which stated that the descent was to take place in the month of January. Other letters, however, threw some doubt on Lord Marischal’s part of the enterprise, which included an auxiliary landing in Scotland, and once more the Jacobite leaders were thrown into a state of suspense. They felt, however, that preparations must be made, and an active propaganda began among the Stuart adherents.

Since Murray left London in the spring of 1743, the Jacobite Associators hadn’t received any letters from Balhaldy. The waiting was really stressful; in fact, Lord Lovat felt so hopeless for a while that he suggested he and his son withdraw to France and spend the rest of their lives in a religious community.[52] However, Lovat’s spirits seemed to lift shortly after this due to some success he had in convincing his neighbors to support the Cause, and he ultimately decided to stay in Scotland. The Jacobite leaders learned about the French preparations only through the newspapers[Pg xlvii], but towards the end of December, they received a letter from Balhaldy stating that the invasion was set for January. Other letters, however, cast doubt on Lord Marischal’s part in the plan, which included a supporting landing in Scotland, and once again, the Jacobite leaders were left in suspense. They realized, though, that they needed to make preparations, and an active campaign began among the Stuart supporters.

Murray’s interview with Prince Charles, August 1744.

In due course news of the disaster to the French fleet reached Scotland, but no word came from Balhaldy or Sempill, and it was then determined to send John Murray to France to find out the state of matters. Murray tells the story of his mission in his Memorials. He met Prince Charles at Paris on several occasions, and told him that so far from there being 20,000 Highlanders ready to rise, as was the boast of Balhaldy, it would be unwise to depend on more than 4000, if so many. But in spite of this discouraging information, the Prince categorically informed Murray that whatever happened he was determined to go to Scotland the following summer, though with a single footman.[53]

In time, news of the disaster to the French fleet reached Scotland, but there was no word from Balhaldy or Sempill. It was then decided to send John Murray to France to find out what was happening. Murray recounts his mission in his Memorials. He met Prince Charles in Paris several times and informed him that, contrary to Balhaldy's claim of 20,000 Highlanders ready to rise, it would be unwise to count on more than 4,000, if that many. Despite this discouraging news, the Prince firmly told Murray that, regardless of the circumstances, he was determined to go to Scotland the following summer, even if it was just with one footman.[53]

Murray hastened home, and at once began an active canvass among the Jacobites; money and arms were collected, and arrangements were made in various parts of the country. Among other expedients was the establishment of Jacobite clubs, and the celebrated ‘Buck Club’ was founded in Edinburgh. The members of these clubs were not at one among themselves. Some of them said they were prepared to join Prince Charles whatever happened, but others only undertook to join if he were accompanied by a French expedition. At a meeting of the Club a document was drawn up by Murray representing[Pg xlviii] the views of the majority present, which insisted that unless the Prince could bring them 6000 regular troops, arms for 10,000 more, and 30,000 louis d’or, it would mean ruin to himself, to the Cause, and to his supporters.[54] This letter was handed to Lord Traquair, who undertook to take it to London and have it sent to Prince Charles in France. By Traquair it was delayed, possibly because he was busy paying court to the lady who about this time became Countess of Traquair,[55] but to the expectant Jacobites for no apparent reason save apathy. After keeping the letter for four months he returned it in April 1745, with the statement that he had been unable to find a proper messenger. Another letter was then sent by young Glengarry, who was about to proceed to France to join the Scottish regiment raised by Lord John Drummond for service in the French army. It was, however, too late; the Prince had left Paris before the letter could be delivered.

Murray rushed home and immediately started an active campaign among the Jacobites; they gathered money and weapons, and made plans in different parts of the country. One of their strategies was to set up Jacobite clubs, including the famous 'Buck Club' founded in Edinburgh. The members of these clubs didn't agree with each other. Some said they were ready to support Prince Charles no matter what, while others only promised to join if he brought along a French army. At a Club meeting, Murray drafted a document that represented the views of most members, insisting that unless the Prince could provide them with 6000 regular soldiers, weapons for another 10,000, and 30,000 louis d’or, it would spell disaster for him, the Cause, and his supporters.[Pg xlviii] This letter was given to Lord Traquair, who promised to deliver it to London and send it to Prince Charles in France. However, Traquair delayed, possibly because he was preoccupied with a woman who was about to become the Countess of Traquair,<[55]> but also for no obvious reason other than his indifference toward the waiting Jacobites. After holding on to the letter for four months, he returned it in April 1745, claiming he couldn't find a suitable messenger. Another letter was then sent by young Glengarry, who was getting ready to go to France to join the Scottish regiment formed by Lord John Drummond for the French army. Unfortunately, it was too late; the Prince had already left Paris before the letter could be delivered.

Distressed that the King of France would not admit him to his presence; wearied with the shuffling of the English Jacobites and the French ministers; depressed by Lord Marischal, who chilled his adventurous aspirations; plagued, as he tells his father, with the tracasseries of his own people, Charles determined to trust himself to the loyalty of the Scottish Highlanders. He ran heavily into debt; he purchased 40,000 livres’ worth of weapons and munitions,—muskets, broadswords, and twenty small field-pieces; he hired and fitted out two vessels. With 4000 louis d’or in his cassette he embarked with seven followers at Nantes on June 22nd (O.S.).

Distressed that the King of France wouldn’t see him; tired of the antics of the English Jacobites and the French ministers; disheartened by Lord Marischal, who dampened his adventurous hopes; troubled, as he told his father, by the annoyances of his own people, Charles decided to rely on the loyalty of the Scottish Highlanders. He went heavily into debt; he bought 40,000 livres worth of weapons and supplies—muskets, broadswords, and twenty small field pieces; he rented and outfitted two ships. With 4,000 louis d’or in his wallet, he set sail with seven companions from Nantes on June 22nd (O.S.).

On July 25th he landed in Arisaig,—the ’Forty-five had begun.

On July 25th, he arrived in Arisaig—the ’Forty-five had begun.

[Pg xlix]

[Pg xlix]

PAPERS OF JOHN MURRAY OF BROUGHTON

These papers, picked up after Culloden, are fragmentary and are not easy reading without a knowledge of their general historical setting, and this I have endeavoured to give in brief outline in the preceding pages. They are particularly interesting as throwing glimpses of light on the origins of the last Jacobite rising. They were written before the collapse of that rising and before Murray, after the great betrayal, had become a social outcast. Murray’s Memorials, edited for the Scottish History Society by the late Mr. Fitzroy Bell, were written thirteen years after Culloden as a history and a vindication. These papers may be considered as memoranda or records of the business Murray had been transacting, and they view the situation from a different angle.

These papers, collected after Culloden, are fragmented and not easy to read without some understanding of the broader historical context, which I’ve briefly outlined in the earlier pages. They are especially interesting as they provide insights into the origins of the last Jacobite rising. They were written before that rising collapsed and before Murray, following the major betrayal, became a social outcast. Murray’s Memorials, edited for the Scottish History Society by the late Mr. Fitzroy Bell, were written thirteen years after Culloden as both a history and a defense. These papers can be seen as notes or records of the activities Murray was engaged in, and they present the situation from a different perspective.

Some of the events mentioned in the Memorials are told with fuller detail in these papers; they also contain thirteen hitherto unpublished letters, consisting for the most part of a correspondence between Murray and the Chevalier de St. George and his secretary James Edgar. But to my mind the chief interest of the papers lies in the fact that they present a clue to the origin of the Jacobite revival which led up to the ’Forty-five; that clue will be found in Murray’s note on page 25.

Some of the events mentioned in the Memorials are described in more detail in these papers; they also include thirteen previously unpublished letters, mostly consisting of correspondence between Murray and the Chevalier de St. George and his secretary James Edgar. However, I believe the main interest of the papers lies in the fact that they provide a clue to the origin of the Jacobite revival that led to the ’Forty-five; that clue can be found in Murray’s note on page 25.

In 1901 the Headquarters Staff of the French Army issued a monograph based on French State Papers, giving in great detail the project for the invasion of Great Britain in 1744, and the negotiations which led up to it. The book is entitled Louis XV. et les Jacobites, the author being Captain Jean Colin of the French Staff. In his opening sentence Captain Colin tells how the Chevalier de St. George was living tranquilly in Rome, having abandoned all hope of a restoration, when about the end of 1737 he received a message from his subjects in Scotland informing him that the Scottish Highlanders[Pg l] would be able, successfully, to oppose the Government troops then in Scotland. In no English or Scottish history, so far as I am aware, has this message from Scotland been emphasised, but in the French records it is assumed as the starting-point of the movement on the part of the French Government to undertake an expedition in favour of the Stuarts. Murray refers to Glenbucket’s mission in the Memorials (p. 2), though very casually, and as if it were a matter of little moment, but the insistence in French State Papers of the importance of the Scottish message made it necessary to investigate the matter further.

In 1901, the Headquarters Staff of the French Army released a detailed report based on French State Papers, outlining the plan for the invasion of Great Britain in 1744 and the negotiations that led to it. The book is titled Louis XV. et les Jacobites, authored by Captain Jean Colin of the French Staff. In his opening sentence, Captain Colin describes how the Chevalier de St. George was living peacefully in Rome, having given up hope for a restoration, when, around the end of 1737, he received a message from his subjects in Scotland informing him that the Scottish Highlanders[Pg l] could successfully oppose the Government troops then in Scotland. So far as I know, this message from Scotland hasn't been emphasized in any English or Scottish history, but in the French records, it's considered the starting point for the French Government’s efforts to organize an expedition in support of the Stuarts. Murray mentions Glenbucket’s mission in the Memorials (p. 2), though quite casually, suggesting it was of little significance, but the emphasis in French State Papers on the importance of the Scottish message necessitated a deeper investigation of the matter.

The first step to discover was the date of the sale of the estate of Glenbucket, the price of which was probably required for the expenses of the mission, and it was found from Duff family papers, kindly communicated by the authors of The Book of the Duffs, that Glenbucket sold his estate to Lord Braco in 1737. The next step is told in the pages of James Francis Edward, where it is narrated that Glenbucket was in Paris about the end of that year, that he there presented to Cardinal Fleury a scheme for a rising in Scotland, which he proposed should be assisted by the Irish regiments in the service of Louis XV. The same work tells how Glenbucket went on to Rome in January 1738, and there conveyed to the Chevalier satisfactory assurances from the Highlands, but few from the Lowlands.[56] The result was that William Hay was sent to Scotland on the mission which eventuated in the ‘Concert’ of Jacobite leaders, Highland and Lowland, and Balhaldy’s subsequent mission to Paris and Rome.

The first step to uncovering the information was finding out the date when the estate of Glenbucket was sold, as the sale price was likely needed to cover mission expenses. It was discovered from Duff family papers, generously shared by the authors of The Book of the Duffs, that Glenbucket sold his estate to Lord Braco in 1737. The next part is detailed in the pages of James Francis Edward, which recounts that Glenbucket was in Paris towards the end of that year, where he presented a plan for a rebellion in Scotland to Cardinal Fleury, suggesting it should be supported by the Irish regiments serving Louis XV. The same work explains how Glenbucket traveled to Rome in January 1738, where he provided the Chevalier with positive assurances from the Highlands, though there were few from the Lowlands. [56] As a result, William Hay was sent to Scotland on a mission that led to the 'Concert' of Jacobite leaders from both the Highlands and Lowlands, along with Balhaldy’s subsequent mission to Paris and Rome.

It would be interesting to know who the Highlanders were who entrusted Glenbucket with the message to Rome. Murray, in his jealous, disparaging way, remarks that it could only be Glengarry and General Gordon, but[Pg li] either he did not know much about Glenbucket or he was prejudiced. In an account of the Highland clans preserved in the Public Record Office, and evidently prepared for the information of the Government after he had turned traitor, Murray writes: ‘I have heard Gordon of Glenbucket looked upon as a man of Consequence, whereas, in fact, he is quite the reverse. He is not liked by his own name, a man of no property nor natural following, of very mean understanding, with a vast deal of vanity.’[57] But this word-portrait does not correspond with that drawn by a writer who had better opportunities of knowing Glenbucket. The author of the Memoirs of the Rebellion in the Counties of Aberdeen and Banff particularly emphasises the affection he inspired in the Highlanders, and significantly adds:—

It would be interesting to know who the Highlanders were that trusted Glenbucket with the message to Rome. Murray, in his jealous and dismissive way, notes that it could only be Glengarry and General Gordon, but[Pg li] either he didn’t know much about Glenbucket or he was biased. In an account of the Highland clans kept in the Public Record Office, which was clearly prepared for the Government after he turned traitor, Murray writes: ‘I’ve heard Gordon of Glenbucket seen as a significant man, whereas, in reality, he’s quite the opposite. He isn’t liked by his own name, is a man with no wealth or natural following, has very limited understanding, and a lot of vanity.’[57] But this description doesn’t match the one given by a writer who had better opportunities to know Glenbucket. The author of the Memoirs of the Rebellion in the Counties of Aberdeen and Banff specifically highlights the affection he inspired in the Highlanders and notably adds:—

‘It is generally believed he was very serviceable to the court of Rome, in keeping up their correspondence with the Chiefs of the Clans, and was certainly ... of late years over at that court, when his Low Country friends believed him to be all the while in the Highlands.’[58]

‘It is widely thought that he was very helpful to the court of Rome, maintaining their communication with the leaders of the Clans, and he was definitely ... in recent years over at that court, while his Low Country friends thought he was in the Highlands the whole time.’[58]

It may be that Lovat was one of those Highlanders who joined in Glenbucket’s message. About this time he had been deprived of his sheriffship and of his independent company, and, furious against the Government, had almost openly avowed his Jacobitism. In 1736 he, as sheriff, had released the Jacobite agent John Roy Stewart from prison in Inverness and by him had despatched a message of devotion to the Chevalier,[59] but of his co-operation with Glenbucket I have found no hint. The sequence of events here narrated make it plain that whoever it was for whom he spoke, it was Gordon of Glenbucket whose initiative in 1737 originated the Jacobite revival which eventually brought Prince Charles to Scotland.

It seems that Lovat was one of those Highlanders who got involved with Glenbucket’s message. Around this time, he had lost his position as sheriff and his independent company, and, angry at the Government, he had almost openly declared his Jacobite beliefs. In 1736, he, as sheriff, had freed the Jacobite agent John Roy Stewart from prison in Inverness and sent a message of loyalty to the Chevalier, [59], but I haven't found any evidence of his cooperation with Glenbucket. The events described here clearly show that whoever he was speaking for, it was Gordon of Glenbucket whose efforts in 1737 sparked the Jacobite revival that eventually led Prince Charles to Scotland.

Analysis of the papers is unnecessary after the admirable introduction to the Memorials by Mr. Fitzroy[Pg lii] Bell, but it may interest readers of that work to refer to two letters mentioned in the Memorials. The first of these was a letter Murray says he wrote to the Chevalier giving an account of his interview with Cecil in London.[60] Mr. Bell searched the Stuart Papers at Windsor, but failed to find it. I think the letter printed on page 20 is the letter that was intended, though it is addressed not to James but to his secretary Edgar. The other letter mentioned in the Memorials was one to the Earl Marischal written about the same time. It was entrusted for delivery to Balhaldy and Traquair, but to Murray’s intense indignation they destroyed it. In the Memorials he expresses his regret that he has not a copy to insert. There is little doubt that the letter on page 27 of these papers is the draft of the letter referred to.

Analyzing the papers isn't necessary after the great introduction to the Memorials by Mr. Fitzroy[Pg lii] Bell, but readers of that work might find it interesting to look at two letters mentioned in the Memorials. The first is a letter that Murray claims he wrote to the Chevalier about his meeting with Cecil in London.[60] Mr. Bell searched the Stuart Papers at Windsor but couldn't find it. I believe the letter printed on page 20 is the one that was meant, even though it's addressed not to James but to his secretary Edgar. The other letter mentioned in the Memorials was one to the Earl Marischal written around the same time. It was supposed to be delivered by Balhaldy and Traquair, but to Murray’s deep frustration, they destroyed it. In the Memorials, he expresses regret that he doesn't have a copy to include. It's quite likely that the letter on page 27 of these papers is the draft of the letter being referenced.

The account of the interview with Cecil (pp. 16, 21) makes pathetic reading. Murray, the Scottish official agent, fresh from seeing Balhaldy and Sempill, the official agents in Paris, is conscious that the latter are deceiving both the French Government and their own party. Murray conceals from Balhaldy that he is going to interview Cecil; from Cecil that he has been in Paris. Cecil, on the other hand, makes only a partial disclosure of his feelings in Murray’s presence. He is contemptuous of his Jacobite colleagues, the Duchess of Buckingham and her party, and he has not a good word to say of Sempill. Murray again ridicules Cecil, of whom he has a poor opinion.

The account of the interview with Cecil (pp. 16, 21) is heartbreaking to read. Murray, the Scottish official agent, just back from meeting Balhaldy and Sempill, the official agents in Paris, realizes that they are lying to both the French Government and their own party. Murray keeps from Balhaldy that he plans to interview Cecil and from Cecil that he has been in Paris. On the other hand, Cecil only partially reveals his feelings in front of Murray. He looks down on his Jacobite colleagues, the Duchess of Buckingham and her group, and has nothing nice to say about Sempill. Murray continues to mock Cecil, whom he holds in low regard.

How could a cause served by such agents ever prosper?

How could a cause supported by such people ever succeed?

This copy of John Murray’s papers and the three following documents were found among some papers relating to the ’Forty-five collected by a gentleman of Midlothian shortly after the Rising. Many years ago I was permitted to copy them, and from these transcripts the text has been printed.

This copy of John Murray’s papers and the three documents that follow were found among some papers related to the 'Forty-five, collected by a gentleman from Midlothian shortly after the Rising. Many years ago, I was allowed to make copies of them, and the printed text comes from these transcripts.

[Pg liii]

[Pg liii]

MEMORIAL CONCERNING THE HIGHLANDS

In 1898 the late Mr. Andrew Lang edited and published a manuscript from the King’s Library in the British Museum, which he entitled The Highlands of Scotland in 1750. Mr. Lang was unable to discover the author, but conjectured that it was written by Mr. Bruce, a Government agent employed to survey the Highland forfeited estates after the ’Forty-five. A close scrutiny of Mr. Lang’s volume along with the Memorial here printed has convinced me that they are the work of the same hand. Whoever wrote the manuscript in the King’s Library, the information contained therein came from the author of this ‘Memorial.’ The manuscript in the British Museum contains a good deal more than this Memorial, but the views advanced are generally the same, the sentiments are similar, and occasionally the phraseology is identical.

In 1898, the late Mr. Andrew Lang edited and published a manuscript from the King’s Library in the British Museum, which he titled The Highlands of Scotland in 1750. Mr. Lang couldn’t figure out who the author was but guessed it might have been Mr. Bruce, a government agent tasked with surveying the Highland forfeited estates after the '45. A close examination of Mr. Lang’s book along with the Memorial printed here has convinced me that both were written by the same person. Whoever wrote the manuscript in the King’s Library, the information in it came from the author of this ‘Memorial.’ The manuscript in the British Museum includes much more than this Memorial, but the views expressed are generally the same, the sentiments are similar, and sometimes the phrasing is identical.

The manuscript from which the ‘Memorial Concerning the Highlands’ is printed is holograph of the Rev. Alexander Macbean, minister of Inverness at the time of the ’Forty-five. Macbean was well qualified to write on this subject. I have been unable to discover the place of his birth, but it may be conjectured that, if not actually born in the Macbean country, his family came from there, i.e. that part of Inverness-shire lying to the east of Loch Ness, of which The Mackintosh was feudal superior. The earliest information that can be gleaned from ecclesiastical records is that he received his degree of Master of Arts from the University of St. Andrews in 1702, and that he was employed as schoolmaster at Fort William from 1701 to 1709. That his salary was slender may well be believed, but its tenuity was aggravated by the fact that it was not paid regularly. We find that as late as 1717 the Commission of the General Assembly applied to the Treasury for arrears[Pg liv] due to Macbean, and was bluntly refused on the ground that the Treasury was not responsible for debts incurred before the Union of 1707.

The manuscript from which the ‘Memorial Concerning the Highlands’ is printed is in the handwriting of Rev. Alexander Macbean, the minister of Inverness during the 'Forty-five. Macbean was well-equipped to write on this topic. I haven't been able to find out where he was born, but it's likely that, if he wasn't actually born in the Macbean region, his family came from there, meaning that part of Inverness-shire to the east of Loch Ness, of which The Mackintosh was the feudal superior. The earliest information available from church records is that he earned his Master of Arts degree from the University of St. Andrews in 1702 and worked as a schoolmaster at Fort William from 1701 to 1709. It’s believable that his salary was modest, and the situation was worsened by the fact that it was not paid consistently. As late as 1717, the Commission of the General Assembly requested the Treasury for back pay owed to Macbean but was bluntly rejected on the grounds that the Treasury was not responsible for debts incurred before the Union of 1707.

Alexander Macbean went from the Western Highlands to Roxburghshire, where he became chaplain to Douglas of Cavers, and was licensed as a probationer by the Presbytery of Edinburgh in 1711. In the following year the right of presentation to the parish of Avoch in the Black Isle, Ross-shire, having fallen to the Presbytery of Chanonry, jure devoluto, Macbean was selected to fill the vacancy, and was ordained minister of the parish in June 1712. His appointment met with fierce opposition. His predecessor had been one of the pre-Revolution episcopal ministers who had retained his living, and the parishioners, for the most part episcopalians, resented his intrusion and fretted him with litigation. He became so unhappy that he obtained permission to resign his charge. In 1714 he was presented to the rural parish of Douglas in Lanarkshire, and there he remained for six years. In 1720 he was back in the Highlands as minister of the ‘third charge’ of Inverness; and in 1727 he was transferred to the ‘first charge’ of that important town, and there he remained until his death in 1762.

Alexander Macbean moved from the Western Highlands to Roxburghshire, where he became the chaplain to Douglas of Cavers and was licensed as a probationer by the Presbytery of Edinburgh in 1711. The following year, when the right to present a minister to the parish of Avoch in the Black Isle, Ross-shire, fell to the Presbytery of Chanonry, jure devoluto, Macbean was chosen to fill the role and was ordained minister of the parish in June 1712. His appointment faced strong opposition. His predecessor had been one of the pre-Revolution episcopal ministers who kept his position, and the parishioners, mostly episcopalians, resented his arrival and troubled him with lawsuits. He became so unhappy that he requested permission to resign. In 1714, he was appointed to the rural parish of Douglas in Lanarkshire, where he stayed for six years. In 1720, he returned to the Highlands as the minister of the 'third charge' of Inverness; and in 1727, he was moved to the 'first charge' of that significant town, where he remained until his death in 1762.

In Inverness he made his individuality strongly felt as champion for the Government. He was ‘the John Knox of the North,’ and one who exerted himself to suppress the spirit of rebellion in and about Inverness in the years 1745 and 1746.

In Inverness, he made his presence known as a strong supporter of the Government. He was referred to as ‘the John Knox of the North,’ actively working to quash the spirit of rebellion in and around Inverness during the years 1745 and 1746.

On one occasion he nearly fell a victim to his interest in the struggle. Having gone with many others to the Muir of Culloden to witness the battle, one of the flying Highlanders attempted to cut him down with his broadsword, but the blow was warded off by a bystander.

On one occasion, he almost became a victim of his fascination with the conflict. After going with many others to the Muir of Culloden to watch the battle, one of the fleeing Highlanders tried to strike him down with his broadsword, but a bystander deflected the blow.

Alexander Macbean was the father of a very distinguished son, Lieut.-General Forbes Macbean (1725-1800)[Pg lv] of the Royal Artillery. This officer was educated at the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, was present at Fontenoy in 1745, and at Minden in 1759. At Minden he so distinguished himself that he was presented with a gratuity of five hundred crowns and a letter of thanks from the Commander-in-Chief, Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick, written with his own hand. Forbes Macbean subsequently became Inspector-General of Portuguese Artillery, 1765-69; served in Canada 1769-73 and 1778-80; but his principal claim to the gratitude of posterity is a collection of manuscript notes recording the early history of the Royal Artillery.

Alexander Macbean was the father of a very distinguished son, Lieut.-General Forbes Macbean (1725-1800)[Pg lv] of the Royal Artillery. This officer was educated at the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, and participated in the Battle of Fontenoy in 1745 and the Battle of Minden in 1759. At Minden, he distinguished himself to the point that he received a gratuity of five hundred crowns and a personal letter of thanks from the Commander-in-Chief, Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick. Forbes Macbean later became the Inspector-General of Portuguese Artillery from 1765 to 1769 and served in Canada from 1769 to 1773 and again from 1778 to 1780. However, his most significant contribution to history is a collection of manuscript notes documenting the early history of the Royal Artillery.

Of Alexander Macbean’s ‘Memorial’ it is perhaps enough to say that it is, considering the times, fairly impartial, and corresponds on the whole with authentic information gleaned from other sources. I have taken the opportunity of supplementing, perhaps overloading, his text with notes detailing, so far as I have been able to discover them from various sources, the names of the principal Highland gentlemen who were concerned in the Rising of the ’Forty-five.

Of Alexander Macbean’s ‘Memorial,’ it’s fair to say that, given the context of the time, it is relatively unbiased and aligns mostly with credible information gathered from other sources. I took the chance to add, maybe excessively, my notes to his text that detail, as much as I’ve been able to find from various sources, the names of the main Highland gentlemen involved in the Rising of ’45.

AN ACCOUNT OF THE LATE REBELLION FROM ROSS AND SUTHERLAND

The author of this narrative was Daniel Munro, minister of the parish of Tain. His origin was probably humble, as in Scott’s Fasti it is stated that owing to his knowledge of the Irish (i.e. Gaelic) language, he was educated on the Church’s charitable funds, and held a bursary from the Synod of Ross at Marischal College, and the University of Aberdeen. Munro was minister of the parish of Auldearn, near Nairn, from 1736 to April 1745, when he was translated to Tain, where he remained until his death in 1748. Of his life and work I have found little record.[Pg lvi] Andrew Henderson, the author of the Edinburgh History of the Rebellion, who knew this country well, says that he was ‘an uncouth man, a monster of impiety, wickedness, and ill nature.’ He further states that he was turned out of his church for ‘fighting and other immoralities.’[61]

The writer of this story was Daniel Munro, the minister of the parish of Tain. His background was likely humble, as noted in Scott’s Fasti, which states that due to his knowledge of the Irish (i.e. Gaelic) language, he was educated on the Church’s charitable funds and received a bursary from the Synod of Ross at Marischal College and the University of Aberdeen. Munro was the minister of the parish of Auldearn, near Nairn, from 1736 until April 1745, when he moved to Tain, where he stayed until his death in 1748. I have found little record of his life and work.[Pg lvi] Andrew Henderson, the author of the Edinburgh History of the Rebellion, who was familiar with this region, describes him as ‘an awkward man, a monster of impiety, wickedness, and bad temper.’ He also notes that he was expelled from his church for ‘fighting and other immoral behavior.’[61]

This ‘Account’ is a very meagre one. The important fact in the history of Ross in the ’Forty-five was that the head of the house of Seaforth forsook the family tradition and took active part with the Government against the old royal family. It was a heavy blow to Prince Charles when Lord Macleod, eldest son of Lord Cromartie, who went to Glasgow to see the Prince in January 1746, informed him at supper that Seaforth had furnished two hundred men for the service of the Government. Charles turned to the French minister and gasped, ‘Hé, mon Dieu, et Seaforth est aussi contre moi!’

This 'Account' is pretty sparse. The key point in the history of Ross during the 'Forty-five is that the head of the Seaforth family broke from tradition and actively supported the Government against the old royal family. It was a significant blow to Prince Charles when Lord Macleod, the eldest son of Lord Cromartie, visited Glasgow to see the Prince in January 1746 and told him at dinner that Seaforth had provided two hundred men to serve the Government. Charles turned to the French minister and exclaimed, ‘Oh my God, Seaforth is also against me!’

Kenneth Mackenzie, known as Lord Fortrose (which was really a Jacobite title), would have been the sixth Earl of Seaforth but for the attainder. His wife was Lady Mary Stewart, eldest daughter of the Earl of Galloway. She held Jacobite principles and raised many of her husband’s clan for the Prince, while most of Fortrose’s men eventually deserted to the Jacobites.

Kenneth Mackenzie, referred to as Lord Fortrose (which was actually a Jacobite title), would have been the sixth Earl of Seaforth if it hadn't been for the attainder. His wife was Lady Mary Stewart, the eldest daughter of the Earl of Galloway. She upheld Jacobite beliefs and rallied many of her husband’s clan for the Prince, while most of Fortrose’s men ultimately defected to the Jacobites.

The principal operations in Ross and Sutherland began after Inverness had been taken by the Jacobite army. Lord Loudoun then retired to the shores of the Dornoch Firth. Lord Cromartie was sent in pursuit. Loudoun had boats, and when Cromartie approached him, he crossed the Firth to Dornoch. The Jacobites had to go round by the head of the Firth, whereupon Loudoun returned in his boats to the southern shore at Tain, and went back to Sutherland when Cromartie came to Ross. Cromartie was superseded by the Duke of Perth. Land operations seeming to be useless, a flotilla of boats was secretly collected[Pg lvii] at Findhorn and taken to Tain under shelter of a dense fog. On March 20th, 1746, Perth crossed over the Meikle Ferry, and completely defeated Loudoun at the bloodless battle of Dornoch. Lord Loudoun, along with Duncan Forbes, Sir Alexander Macdonald, Macleod of Macleod, fled to the Isle of Skye, while the chief of Mackintosh was taken prisoner.

The main actions in Ross and Sutherland started after the Jacobite army captured Inverness. Lord Loudoun then withdrew to the banks of the Dornoch Firth. Lord Cromartie was sent after him. Loudoun had boats, and when Cromartie got close, he crossed the Firth to Dornoch. The Jacobites had to navigate around the head of the Firth, so Loudoun returned in his boats to the southern shore at Tain and went back to Sutherland when Cromartie arrived in Ross. Cromartie was replaced by the Duke of Perth. Since land operations seemed pointless, a group of boats was secretly gathered[Pg lvii] at Findhorn and taken to Tain under the cover of a thick fog. On March 20th, 1746, Perth crossed over the Meikle Ferry and completely defeated Loudoun in the conflict known as the bloodless battle of Dornoch. Lord Loudoun, along with Duncan Forbes, Sir Alexander Macdonald, and Macleod of Macleod, fled to the Isle of Skye, while the chief of Mackintosh was captured.

On March 25th, the Hazard, a sloop of war which had been captured by the Jacobites at Montrose four months previously and sent to France, when returning with money, stores, and recruits, was forced to run ashore in the Kyle of Tongue by four men-of-war. Lord Reay, the Whig head of the Mackays, took possession of the wreck and its contents, including 156 prisoners and £12,000, the money being sorely needed by the army. Lord Cromartie and his son, Lord Macleod, were sent with a force of 1500 men to expostulate with Lord Reay, and if possible to recover the spoil. In this they naturally failed, but they continued the march as far as Thurso, beating up for recruits and levying the land cess upon the inhabitants.[62] On the way back, Cromartie and his son paid a visit to the Countess of Sutherland at Dunrobin. There, on the day before the battle of Culloden, they were made prisoners by the clever trick of a certain Ensign Mackay, while their followers, then at Golspie, were beaten and dispersed in an action sometimes called the battle of the Little Ferry.

On March 25th, the Hazard, a war sloop that had been captured by the Jacobites at Montrose four months earlier and sent to France, was forced to run ashore in the Kyle of Tongue by four warships while returning with money, supplies, and recruits. Lord Reay, the Whig leader of the Mackays, took control of the wreck and its contents, which included 156 prisoners and £12,000, money that was urgently needed by the army. Lord Cromartie and his son, Lord Macleod, were sent with a force of 1,500 men to confront Lord Reay and try to recover the loot. They naturally failed in this mission, but they continued their march as far as Thurso, recruiting more men and collecting local taxes from the inhabitants. On the way back, Cromartie and his son visited the Countess of Sutherland at Dunrobin. There, the day before the battle of Culloden, they were captured by a clever trick orchestrated by a certain Ensign Mackay, while their followers, who were at Golspie, were defeated and scattered in an engagement sometimes referred to as the battle of the Little Ferry.

MEMOIRS OF THE REBELLION IN THE COUNTIES OF ABERDEEN AND BANFF

This manuscript bears neither signature nor date, and gives no indication of authorship. There can, however, be little doubt that the author of the narrative was a[Pg lviii] minister belonging to Aberdeen or Banffshire, and that it was written at the same time as the two previous papers, about the end of 1746 or the beginning of 1747.

This manuscript has no signature or date, and there’s no sign of who wrote it. However, it’s clear that the author of the narrative was a[Pg lviii] minister from Aberdeen or Banffshire, and it was written around the end of 1746 or the beginning of 1747, about the same time as the two earlier papers.

The story of the events of the Rising in the north-eastern counties is recounted with much fulness of detail, and with a minute knowledge of the country and the people. It is told, moreover, with marked fairness. Although the writer is a Whig, he speaks kindly of the Jacobite leaders, and he does not conceal the cruelties committed by the Government troops.

The account of the events of the Rising in the northeastern counties is presented in great detail, showing a deep understanding of the area and its people. Additionally, it's narrated with notable fairness. Even though the author is a Whig, he speaks respectfully of the Jacobite leaders and doesn't hide the brutalities carried out by the Government troops.

He tells the story of the skirmish of Inverurie in greater detail than is found elsewhere, and he gives picturesque touches in places that add to the interest of his narrative. Specially graphic is his account of Macleod’s famous piper, MacCrimmon, who was captured in that action.

He gives a more detailed account of the skirmish at Inverurie than what you find anywhere else, adding vivid details in certain spots that enhance the interest of his story. His description of Macleod’s famous piper, MacCrimmon, who was captured in that battle, is especially striking.

The condition of parties in the north-eastern counties was not what it had been in the ’Fifteen. At that time the great lords of the counties had been Jacobite, whereas in 1745 most of the Aberdeenshire peers were supporters of the Government. None of them, however, took a prominent lead in the struggle. It is interesting to read the reasons given by the author of these Memoirs for the reticence of the Whig peers. The Duke of Gordon was prevented by indisposition. Lord Findlater’s sickly condition quite disabled him, and Lord Kintore’s incumbrances on his fortune were a drawback. Lord Forbes again had by no means an estate suited to his ability, while Lord Saltoun had no weight in the county. As for Lord Braco (afterwards Earl Fife), the newness of his family would have marred any project of his forming. The author considers, however, that something might have been expected of the Earl of Aberdeen.[63]

The situation of the parties in the northeastern counties was not the same as it had been in '45. Back then, the powerful lords of the counties were Jacobite, but by 1745, most of the Aberdeenshire peers were loyal to the Government. However, none of them played a significant role in the conflict. It's interesting to read the reasons given by the author of these memoirs for the silence of the Whig peers. The Duke of Gordon was unable to participate due to illness. Lord Findlater was too unwell to take action, and Lord Kintore’s financial issues held him back. Lord Forbes didn’t have an estate that matched his capabilities, while Lord Saltoun lacked influence in the county. As for Lord Braco (who later became the Earl of Fife), his family's recent ascent would have hindered any plans he might have had. The author believes, however, that some action might have been expected from the Earl of Aberdeen.[63]

These explanations carry no conviction, and there can be little doubt that, in the beginning, these Aberdeenshire[Pg lix] lords were more or less sitting on the fence. Nor is this to be wondered at; family tradition and family connection would make them very chary of taking any prominent steps against the Jacobites. The Duke of Gordon, whose mother was a daughter of the Earl of Peterborough, had been brought up a Protestant and a Whig in defiance of the Catholic religion and Jacobite principles of his predecessors. Yet he must have had some sympathy with the family tradition. Early in September his father’s old factor, Gordon of Glenbucket, carried off horses and arms from Gordon Castle while the Duke was there, apparently with his connivance. Moreover, Sir Harry Innes of Innes in writing of this to his brother-in-law, Ludovick Grant, adds: ‘I am sory to tell yow that the Duke is quite wronge.’[64] By the end of November, however, he had pronounced for the Government. Lord Findlater was a Jacobite in the ’Fifteen, and had then been imprisoned in Edinburgh Castle. Lord Kintore’s father had fought at Sheriffmuir, and been deprived of his office of Knight-Marischal as a punishment. Lord Braco’s family was deeply concerned on the Jacobite side; his son-in-law, Sir William Gordon of Park, his brother-in-law, William Baird of Auchmedden, his nephew, a son of Duff of Hatton, were all ‘out,’ and his eldest son was only kept by force from joining the Jacobites.[65] Lord Aberdeen had only in March succeeded his father, who, it is known, had intended to join the Stuart cause.[66]

These explanations lack credibility, and it's clear that, in the beginning, these lords from Aberdeenshire[Pg lix] were essentially sitting on the fence. This isn't surprising; their family history and connections would make them very hesitant to take any active stance against the Jacobites. The Duke of Gordon, whose mother was a daughter of the Earl of Peterborough, was raised as a Protestant and a Whig, opposing the Catholic faith and Jacobite beliefs of his ancestors. Still, he must have felt some connection to the family legacy. In early September, his father’s old steward, Gordon of Glenbucket, took horses and weapons from Gordon Castle while the Duke was there, seemingly with his approval. Additionally, Sir Harry Innes of Innes mentioned this to his brother-in-law, Ludovick Grant, writing: ‘I am sorry to tell you that the Duke is quite wrong.’ By the end of November, however, he had declared support for the Government. Lord Findlater was a Jacobite during the ’Fifteen and had previously been imprisoned in Edinburgh Castle. Lord Kintore’s father had fought at Sheriffmuir and lost his position as Knight-Marischal as a consequence. Lord Braco’s family was heavily involved on the Jacobite side; his son-in-law, Sir William Gordon of Park, his brother-in-law, William Baird of Auchmedden, and his nephew, a son of Duff of Hatton, were all 'out', and his eldest son was only prevented by force from joining the Jacobites. Lord Aberdeen had only succeeded his father in March, who, it is known, had planned to support the Stuart cause.

Lord Forbes, whose traditions were Whig, and whose father was Lord-Lieutenant of the county in 1715, might have acted, but his family connections were nearly all Jacobite. He was the brother-in-law of Lord Pitsligo and[Pg lx] Gordon of Park, while his three daughters were married to prominent Jacobites.[67]

Lord Forbes, who came from a Whig background and whose father was the Lord-Lieutenant of the county in 1715, could have taken action, but most of his family ties were Jacobite. He was the brother-in-law of Lord Pitsligo and Gordon of Park, and his three daughters were married to notable Jacobites.[67]

Nor on the Jacobite side were there any noted personages. The two most prominent Jacobite leaders were Gordon of Glenbucket, a tenant farmer, and Lord Pitsligo. Though of small estate, Lord Pitsligo was universally respected for his high character and his personal piety. He knew his own mind and never faltered. He had been out in the ’Fifteen, and was sixty-seven years of age. In a letter to a friend, he confesses that what really troubled him was the fear of ridicule that a man of his age should take part in the adventure; but he thought, and weighed, and weighed again. His enthusiasm was of the coldest kind, but duty called him and he obeyed. His example influenced many Aberdeen and Banffshire lairds, and he gathered a considerable contingent of horse and foot. It is related that when he was ready to start to join the Prince, and had put himself at the head of his troop, he turned his face upwards and prayed aloud, ‘O Lord, Thou knowest that our cause is just,’ and then quietly gave the order to march.[68]

Nor were there any notable figures on the Jacobite side. The two main Jacobite leaders were Gordon of Glenbucket, a tenant farmer, and Lord Pitsligo. Although he had a small estate, Lord Pitsligo was widely respected for his strong character and personal faith. He was confident in his beliefs and never hesitated. He had participated in the uprising of 'Fifteen and was sixty-seven years old. In a letter to a friend, he admitted that what really bothered him was the fear of being mocked for a man of his age joining the cause; but he thought it over, considered it again and again. His enthusiasm was rather muted, but he felt it was his duty, and he responded accordingly. His example inspired many lairds from Aberdeen and Banffshire, and he gathered a significant group of soldiers on horseback and foot. It’s said that when he was ready to set off and had taken his place at the front of his troop, he looked up and prayed aloud, ‘O Lord, You know our cause is just,’ and then calmly gave the order to march.[68]

To understand these Memoirs fully, it is necessary to place them in their historical setting, and to give a brief outline of the military operations during the campaign.

To fully understand these Memoirs, it's important to consider their historical context and provide a brief overview of the military operations during the campaign.

On August 31st the corporation of Aberdeen, thoroughly alarmed at the news of the advance of Prince Charles, determined to put the city into a position of defence. Lists were made of all available citizens, who were embodied into a force of twelve companies of infantry and a detachment of artillery, while arms and ammunition were collected for their equipment. Sir John Cope, who had left Inverness on September 4th, reached Aberdeen on the 11th. Finding guns placed to defend the harbour and citizens fully armed, he commandeered both cannon[Pg lxi] and small arms, and carried them off, alleging that otherwise they might fall into the enemy’s hands. Cope left Aberdeen by sea for the Firth of Forth on September 15th, the city being left without any defence.

On August 31st, the city council of Aberdeen, deeply concerned about the news of Prince Charles's approach, decided to prepare the city for defense. They compiled a list of all available citizens, forming a force of twelve infantry companies and a unit of artillery, while gathering weapons and ammunition for their supplies. Sir John Cope, who had departed from Inverness on September 4th, arrived in Aberdeen on the 11th. Noticing artillery set up to protect the harbor and the citizens fully armed, he took control of both the cannons[Pg lxi] and small arms, claiming that otherwise, they could fall into enemy hands. Cope left Aberdeen by sea for the Firth of Forth on September 15th, leaving the city unprotected.

Meantime the Jacobites were not idle. Gordon of Glenbucket, now aged seventy-two, had been bed-ridden for three years, but he no sooner heard of the Prince’s arrival than he experienced ‘a kind of new life.’[69] Although bent nearly double on horseback, he hurried off to the West Highlands, and met Prince Charles at Kinlochmoidart on August 18th. He was back in Banffshire raising men by September 5th.[70] John Hamilton, the Duke of Gordon’s factor in Strathbogie, also quickly raised a contingent, and ten days after Cope’s departure, on September 25th, he marched into Aberdeen, where he proclaimed King James at the Cross, and perpetrated the somewhat ludicrous outrage on the provost and magistrates narrated on page 119. From that time until the last week in February, Aberdeen was under Jacobite government. Men were hurriedly collected; and on October 4th Glenbucket joined Prince Charles at Edinburgh with 400 men from Strathavon and Glenlivet, Hamilton also arrived in the city with 480 from Strathbogie and the Enzie. On the 9th Lord Pitsligo followed with 132 horse and 248 foot.

Meanwhile, the Jacobites were busy. Gordon of Glenbucket, now 72 years old, had been bedridden for three years, but as soon as he heard about the Prince’s arrival, he felt “a kind of new life.” Although he was nearly doubled over on horseback, he rushed off to the West Highlands and met Prince Charles at Kinlochmoidart on August 18th. He was back in Banffshire recruiting men by September 5th. John Hamilton, the Duke of Gordon’s agent in Strathbogie, also quickly gathered a group, and ten days after Cope’s departure, on September 25th, he marched into Aberdeen, where he proclaimed King James at the Cross and committed the somewhat ridiculous act against the provost and magistrates described on page 119. From that point until the last week in February, Aberdeen was under Jacobite control. Men were quickly assembled, and on October 4th, Glenbucket joined Prince Charles in Edinburgh with 400 men from Strathavon and Glenlivet, while Hamilton also arrived in the city with 480 from Strathbogie and the Enzie. On the 9th, Lord Pitsligo followed with 132 horse and 248 foot.

In the last week of October Lord Lewis Gordon, brother of the Duke of Gordon, a young naval officer who had joined the Prince in Edinburgh, was sent north as Lord-Lieutenant of the counties of Aberdeen and Banff. He found his task harder than he expected, being grossly thwarted by ‘the vile and malicious behaviour of the Prysbiterian ministers.’[71] Towards the end of November, to his intense surprise, his brother, the Duke, instructed his vassals to disregard Lord Lewis’s orders.[72] In spite of[Pg lxii] discouragement, Lord Lewis worked on. Moir of Lonmay was appointed deputy-governor of Aberdeenshire and Baird of Auchmedden of Banffshire. Three new regiments were raised under Moir of Stonywood (Lonmay’s brother), Gordon of Avochy (Glenbucket’s nephew), and Farquharson of Monaltrie, a cadet of Invercauld; rates and taxes were imposed and collected; and a good deal of hardship was inflicted on the lieges.

In the last week of October, Lord Lewis Gordon, brother of the Duke of Gordon and a young naval officer who had joined the Prince in Edinburgh, was sent north as the Lord-Lieutenant of the counties of Aberdeen and Banff. He found his task tougher than he expected, being seriously hindered by “the vile and malicious behavior of the Presbyterian ministers.” [71] Towards the end of November, to his great surprise, his brother, the Duke, instructed his vassals to ignore Lord Lewis’s orders. [72] Despite the discouragement, Lord Lewis kept pushing forward. Moir of Lonmay was appointed deputy-governor of Aberdeenshire, and Baird of Auchmedden took charge in Banffshire. Three new regiments were formed under Moir of Stonywood (Lonmay’s brother), Gordon of Avochy (Glenbucket’s nephew), and Farquharson of Monaltrie, a cadet of Invercauld; rates and taxes were established and collected, leading to considerable hardship for the citizens.

After the battle of Prestonpans (September 21st) Lord Loudoun, who there acted as Cope’s adjutant-general, had gone to London, where he received a commission to return to Inverness to command an army of Highlanders friendly to the Government, then being organised by Duncan Forbes of Culloden.

After the battle of Prestonpans (September 21st), Lord Loudoun, who was Cope’s adjutant-general at the time, went to London. There, he got orders to go back to Inverness to lead an army of Highlanders loyal to the Government, which was being organized by Duncan Forbes of Culloden.

By December Loudoun was able to send an expedition under Munro of Culcairn and Macleod of Macleod to relieve Aberdeen. Lord Lewis Gordon, reinforced by some of the French troops of Lord John Drummond, which had landed in November at Stonehaven, Peterhead, and Montrose, met the invaders at Inverurie on December 23rd. He defeated Macleod completely, and forced him to retire across the Spey, thus freeing Aberdeen and Banff from all enemy troops.

By December, Loudoun was able to send an expedition led by Munro of Culcairn and Macleod of Macleod to help relieve Aberdeen. Lord Lewis Gordon, supported by some French troops from Lord John Drummond, which had landed in November at Stonehaven, Peterhead, and Montrose, faced the invaders at Inverurie on December 23rd. He completely defeated Macleod and pushed him back across the Spey, freeing Aberdeen and Banff from all enemy forces.

Lord Lewis now collected all his available forces and marched to Stirling to join Prince Charles, who had returned from his English expedition; and by the first week in January 1746 Aberdeen was left without Jacobite troops. The battle of Falkirk was fought on January 17th, and on February 1st the army of Prince Charles began its retreat to the north. One column under Lord George Murray, taking the coast road, marched through Aberdeen and on to Elgin; another proceeded by Glenshee and Braemar, occupying for a time the northern districts of the county; the main body of the Highlanders went by Blair Atholl and Badenoch to Inverness. Two[Pg lxiii] small French contingents landed at Aberdeenshire ports on February 21st and 22nd, but on the 23rd the last of the Jacobite army had left the town of Aberdeen.

Lord Lewis gathered all his available forces and marched to Stirling to meet up with Prince Charles, who had returned from his English campaign. By the first week of January 1746, Aberdeen was left without any Jacobite troops. The battle of Falkirk took place on January 17th, and on February 1st, Prince Charles’s army started its retreat to the north. One group led by Lord George Murray took the coastal route, marching through Aberdeen and on to Elgin; another went through Glenshee and Braemar, temporarily occupying the northern areas of the county; the main group of Highlanders traveled through Blair Atholl and Badenoch to Inverness. Two[Pg lxiii] small French contingents landed at Aberdeenshire ports on February 21st and 22nd, but by the 23rd, the last of the Jacobite army had left the town of Aberdeen.

Meantime, Cumberland’s army was in full pursuit. It left Perth on February 20th, and the van reached Aberdeen on the 25th, the Duke himself following two days later. The Earl of Albemarle and General Bland, along with Brigadier Mordaunt, occupied Strathbogie, the Jacobites retiring before them. Lord John Drummond was entrusted with the defence of the passage of the Spey, but some troops were left under John Roy Stewart and Major Glascoe to carry on a guerrilla warfare. Glascoe, on March 20th, surprised a detachment of Campbell’s and Kingston’s horse at Keith, and captured nearly the whole garrison.

In the meantime, Cumberland’s army was in hot pursuit. They left Perth on February 20th, and the vanguard reached Aberdeen on the 25th, with the Duke himself trailing two days later. The Earl of Albemarle and General Bland, along with Brigadier Mordaunt, took over Strathbogie, forcing the Jacobites to retreat. Lord John Drummond was tasked with defending the Spey crossing, but some troops were left under John Roy Stewart and Major Glascoe to conduct guerrilla warfare. On March 20th, Glascoe surprised a group of Campbell’s and Kingston’s cavalry at Keith and captured almost the entire garrison.

Hitherto the loyal inhabitants of Aberdeen had murmured at the excesses of the Jacobite troops, but their complaints were more bitter at the excesses of those of the Government.[73] Houses were plundered and burned, the chapels and meeting-houses of Roman Catholics and Episcopalian non-jurors were destroyed, and the inhabitants were more or less terrorised. In the General Order Book of the Duke of Cumberland, an instance is given of the kind of punishment that was meted out. There was a certain loyal schoolmaster in the parish of Glass, who, having learned that John Roy Stewart intended to spring a surprise similar to that at Keith, warned Lord Albemarle of the intention. This warning had the effect of keeping the Government troops on the watch for several nights. No attack was made on them, however, and the General, believing that the intelligence had been given for the purpose of harassing the troops by depriving them of sleep (although in reality he had been saved by the vigilance he had exercised as the result of the schoolmaster’s information), sent the unfortunate informer to[Pg lxiv] headquarters at Aberdeen. The punishment was very severe. In the Order Book, it is stated ‘that Peter Maconachy of Glass, convicted of spreading false intelligence in order to allarm our defence post, to be tied to a cart and whipped and drum’d through the cantoonments of Aberdeen, Old Meldrum, and Strathbogey, with a labell on his breast mentioning his crime. From Strathbogey he is to be turn’d out towards the rebells with orders never to come near where the army may be on pain of being hanged. The woman suspected of inveigling men to list in the French service is to be carried in the same cart.’[74] On April 8th, the Duke of Cumberland left Aberdeen, concentrated his army on Cullen, and crossed the Spey on the 12th, when Lord John Drummond retired before him. Four days later the battle of Culloden was fought.

Up until now, the loyal people of Aberdeen had complained about the behavior of the Jacobite troops, but their complaints were even more intense regarding the actions of the Government. Homes were looted and burned, the chapels and meeting houses of Roman Catholics and Episcopalian non-jurors were destroyed, and the residents lived in fear. In the General Order Book of the Duke of Cumberland, there's an example of the type of punishment that was handed out. There was a loyal schoolteacher in the parish of Glass who, after learning that John Roy Stewart planned to launch a surprise similar to the one at Keith, notified Lord Albemarle about it. This alert kept the Government troops on high alert for several nights. However, no attack occurred, and the General, believing the warning had been given just to keep his troops awake (when in reality, it had saved them due to the schoolmaster's vigilance), sent the unfortunate informant to[Pg lxiv] headquarters in Aberdeen. The punishment was extremely harsh. The Order Book states that "Peter Maconachy of Glass, convicted of spreading false information to alarm our defense post, is to be tied to a cart and whipped and paraded through the camps of Aberdeen, Old Meldrum, and Strathbogey, with a label on his chest stating his crime. From Strathbogey, he is to be expelled towards the rebels with orders never to approach where the army may be on pain of hanging. The woman suspected of luring men to join the French service is to be taken in the same cart." On April 8th, the Duke of Cumberland left Aberdeen, gathered his army at Cullen, and crossed the Spey on the 12th, at which point Lord John Drummond retreated before him. Four days later, the battle of Culloden occurred.

CAPTAIN DANIEL’S PROGRESS WITH PRINCE CHARLES

This narrative, written by an English officer, who served in Lord Balmerino’s regiment, is occasionally referred to by modern historians of the Jacobite period, but has never been printed. Two manuscripts are known to exist. One, which belongs to an English gentleman, was shown to me by the late Mr. Andrew Lang. It is evidently contemporary, or nearly so, but the spelling is so eccentric that it is exceedingly difficult to read. The second manuscript is preserved at Drummond Castle, and is a certificated copy of the original, but it is written with modern spelling.[Pg lxv] Both were put at my disposal, but as there was nothing to show that the older version was Daniel’s holograph—indeed the evidence was against it—I preferred to use the Drummond Castle copy. The matter in both was practically identical. Of the writer nothing is known beyond what he tells of himself. Apparently he came from the Fylde country of Lancashire, the district between the Lune and the Ribble, and he was brought up in Jacobite principles.

This story, written by an English officer who served in Lord Balmerino’s regiment, is sometimes referenced by modern historians of the Jacobite era, but it has never been published. Two manuscripts are known to exist. One, owned by an English gentleman, was shown to me by the late Mr. Andrew Lang. It's clearly contemporary or very close to it, but the spelling is so unusual that it's really hard to read. The second manuscript is kept at Drummond Castle and is a certified copy of the original, but it uses modern spelling.[Pg lxv] Both were made available to me, but since there was no evidence that the older version was Daniel’s handwriting—in fact, the evidence pointed against it—I chose to use the Drummond Castle copy. The content in both was almost identical. Nothing is known about the author beyond what he mentions about himself. Apparently, he came from the Fylde area of Lancashire, the region between the Lune and the Ribble, and he was raised with Jacobite beliefs.

The narrative is particularly interesting as giving the adventures of an English Jacobite. Daniel, stimulated by the call of conscience, had determined to embrace the cause. He had the good fortune to meet the Duke of Perth when the Prince’s army was near Preston on the march to Derby. The Duke invited him to join, offering him his friendship and patronage. Daniel accepted the offer, and he continued with the army until the end, when he escaped to France in the same ship as the Duke of Perth, whose death he witnessed on the voyage from Arisaig to France in the following May.

The story is especially captivating as it recounts the adventures of an English Jacobite. Daniel, motivated by his conscience, decided to support the cause. He was fortunate to meet the Duke of Perth when the Prince’s army was near Preston on its way to Derby. The Duke invited him to join, offering his friendship and support. Daniel accepted the offer and stayed with the army until the end, when he escaped to France on the same ship as the Duke of Perth, witnessing the Duke's death during the journey from Arisaig to France the following May.

On joining, Daniel was attached to the first troop of Life Guards, of which Lord Elcho was colonel, but on the retreat from Derby he was transferred to the second troop of the same regiment, which was commanded by the Hon. Arthur Elphinstone, who about three weeks later succeeded his brother as sixth Lord Balmerino. Daniel conceived a great affection and admiration for his colonel, yet in his laudatory account he mentions a painful characteristic of the times. A gentleman, and a scholar who could recite pages from the Classics, Lord Balmerino was of a noble personage and had the courage of a lion. Moreover he never failed in his military duties. His ‘sole and predominant passion’ was for hard drinking. But for this weakness, ‘he would have shone with the same lustre in the army as he afterwards did on the scaffold.’

Upon joining, Daniel became part of the first troop of Life Guards, led by Colonel Lord Elcho. However, during the retreat from Derby, he was moved to the second troop of the same regiment, commanded by the Hon. Arthur Elphinstone, who, about three weeks later, succeeded his brother as sixth Lord Balmerino. Daniel developed a deep affection and admiration for his colonel, yet in his praise, he points out a troubling aspect of the era. A gentleman and a scholar who could recite passages from the Classics, Lord Balmerino was of noble stature and had the bravery of a lion. Additionally, he never neglected his military responsibilities. His ‘sole and predominant passion’ was for heavy drinking. Without this flaw, ‘he would have shone with the same brilliance in the army as he later did on the scaffold.’

[Pg lxvi]

[Pg lxvi]

In the narrative there is no affectation of impartiality. Daniel is constantly comparing the iniquities of his enemies with the virtues of his friends. There is a curious incident mentioned by him when referring to the death of Sir Robert Munro of Foulis at the battle of Falkirk. He says (page 198), ‘among the slain were ... Sir Robert Munro, who was heard much to blaspheme during the engagement, and as a punishment for which, his tongue was miraculously cut asunder by a sword that struck him directly across the mouth.’ This is rather a startling statement concerning the end of one whom Dr. Doddridge has depicted as a type of the Christian soldier.[75] There seems, however, no necessity to doubt the truth of Daniel’s statement as representing the talk of the Highland camp; for it must be remembered that Sir Robert had served for many years with the army in Flanders whose strong language was proverbial. With the Highlanders on the other hand, profanity was not a common failing, and they may have been shocked at expletives which to an old campaigner were but unmeaning commonplaces of military expression.

In the story, there's no pretense of neutrality. Daniel is always comparing the wrongdoings of his enemies to the qualities of his friends. He mentions an interesting incident related to the death of Sir Robert Munro of Foulis at the battle of Falkirk. He states (page 198), ‘among the slain were ... Sir Robert Munro, who was heard blaspheming a lot during the battle, and as punishment for this, his tongue was miraculously cut in half by a sword that struck him directly across the mouth.’ This is quite a shocking statement about the end of someone whom Dr. Doddridge described as a model Christian soldier.[75] However, there seems to be no reason to doubt the accuracy of Daniel’s account as reflecting the talk at the Highland camp; it should be noted that Sir Robert had fought for many years with the army in Flanders, known for its strong language. On the other hand, the Highlanders did not typically use profanity, and they might have been taken aback by expressions that to an experienced soldier were just meaningless military slang.

Doddridge gives a certain amount of confirmation to Daniel’s story. He tells that when Sir Robert’s body was found the day after the battle, his face was so cut and mangled that it was hardly recognisable.

Doddridge provides some validation for Daniel’s account. He mentions that when Sir Robert’s body was discovered the day after the battle, his face was so slashed and disfigured that it was barely recognizable.

Daniel on joining the Jacobite army had been befriended by the Duke of Perth, and naturally he heartily disapproved of Lord George Murray. His dislike and distrust are shown frequently in his narrative. He tells, too, how his chief, Lord Balmerino, quarrelled with Lord George; how the hardships the cavalry endured in the campaign nearly drove the men to mutiny, the blame being thrown on the general. Such unreasoning accusations must have made Lord George’s life, hard as it was,[Pg lxvii] more difficult than it would have been had officers and men been really disciplined.

Daniel, upon joining the Jacobite army, became friends with the Duke of Perth, who naturally disapproved of Lord George Murray. His dislike and distrust are frequently evident in his account. He also recounts how his leader, Lord Balmerino, had a falling out with Lord George; how the hardships the cavalry faced during the campaign nearly pushed the men to mutiny, with the blame being directed at the general. Such unjust accusations must have made Lord George’s life, already difficult,[Pg lxvii] even harder than it would have been if both officers and soldiers had been truly disciplined.

There is another charge which Daniel makes against Lord George Murray—a charge which raised much controversy amongst the Jacobites—namely, the responsibility for fighting the battle of Culloden.

There’s another accusation Daniel levels at Lord George Murray—an accusation that sparked a lot of debate among the Jacobites—specifically, the blame for fighting in the battle of Culloden.

Daniel says: ‘Contrary to the Prince’s inclination, Lord George Murray insisted on standing and fighting that day. The Prince, notwithstanding his great inclination to avoid fighting, was at last obliged to give way to the importunity of Lord George Murray, who even used terms very cutting in case of refusal.’ This attempt to fix the responsibility on Lord George is contrary to impartial evidence, as may be seen by careful examination of contemporary documents.[76] Lord George was against fighting, his scheme being to retire to the mountains, very much as proposed by the Marquis D’Eguilles. The Prince surely must have known this, yet we find that while hiding in South Uist he told Neil Maceachain that ‘he blamed always my Lord George as being the only instrument in loseing the battle, and altho’ that he, the morning before the action, used all his rhetorick, and eloquence against fighting, yet my Lord George outreasoned him, till at last he yielded for fear to raise a dissension among the army, all which he attributed to his infidelity, roguery, and treachery.’ One can only surmise that in his anger against Lord George Murray, the Prince’s recollection of what had actually happened had become confused, and, surrounded by flatterers even in his flight, he had brought himself to lay the responsibility on his Lieutenant-General.

Daniel says: ‘Unlike the Prince’s preference, Lord George Murray insisted on standing and fighting that day. The Prince, despite his strong desire to avoid battle, eventually had to give in to Lord George Murray’s persistent urging, who even resorted to sharp language in case of refusal.’ This attempt to place the blame on Lord George contradicts impartial evidence, as can be seen through a careful review of contemporary documents. [76] Lord George was against fighting; his plan was to retreat to the mountains, similar to what the Marquis D’Eguilles proposed. The Prince must have known this, yet we find that while hiding in South Uist, he told Neil Maceachain that ‘he always blamed my Lord George for being the only reason we lost the battle, and although he tried with all his rhetoric and persuasion against fighting the morning before the action, my Lord George reasoned him down, until he finally gave in out of fear of causing dissent within the army, which he attributed to Lord George’s disloyalty, trickery, and treachery.’ One can only guess that in his anger towards Lord George Murray, the Prince’s memory of the events had become muddled, and, surrounded by sycophants even during his escape, he convinced himself to place the blame on his Lieutenant-General.

The controversy, which long raged among the Jacobites,[Pg lxviii] may be set at rest once and for all from the report of the Marquis D’Eguilles to Louis XV. D’Eguilles was the accredited envoy of the King of France to the itinerant Court of Prince Charles Edward. On his return to France after a year’s confinement as a prisoner of war, he wrote an official report of his mission to the French king. It is a State document, preserved in the archives of the French Government, but apparently it has never been examined by any British historian. From the text of that document, an extract from which is here given, it will be seen that on the Prince, and the Prince alone, lay the responsibility of fighting the battle of Culloden.

The long-standing debate among the Jacobites[Pg lxviii] can be settled once and for all with the report of the Marquis D’Eguilles to Louis XV. D’Eguilles was the official envoy of the King of France to the traveling Court of Prince Charles Edward. After spending a year as a prisoner of war, he returned to France and wrote an official report on his mission to the French king. This State document is kept in the archives of the French Government, but it seems that no British historian has ever reviewed it. From the content of that document, an excerpt of which is provided here, it will be clear that the responsibility for fighting the battle of Culloden rested solely on the Prince.

French Envoy’s Official Report to Louis XV. on the Battle of Culloden

Le prince, qui se croyait invincible, parce qu’il n’avait pas encore été vaincu, défié par des ennemis qu’il méprisait trop, voyant à leur tête le fils du concurrent de son père, fier et haut comme il l’était, mal conseillé, peut-être trahi, oubliant en ce moment tout autre projet, ne put se résoudre à lui refuser un seul jour le combat. Je lui demandai un quart d’heure d’audience en particulier. Là, je me jetai en vain à ses pieds; je lui représentai en vain qu’il lui manquait encore la moitié de son armée, que la plupart de ceux qui étaient revenus n’avaient plus de boucliers, espèce d’armes défensives, sans les quelles ils ne sauraient combattre avec avantage; qu’ils étaient tous épuisés de fatigue, par une longue course faite la nuit précédente; que depuis deux jours plusieurs n’avaient pas mangé, faute de pain; qu’il fallait se réduire à défendre Inverness; qu’il serait même encore plus prudent de l’abandonner et de mettre entre les ennemis et nous la rivière, auprès de laquelle cette ville est batie; qu’au pis-aller nous entrerions dans les montagnes voisines; que c’était là qu’il serait véritablement invincible; que nous y resterions les maîtres de la partie de la côte où devait arriver le secours d’armes et d’argent que nous attendions; que dès que nous l’aurions reçu, nous marcherions vers l’Angleterre par cette même côte, ainsi qu’il avait été convenu; que plus les ennemis se seraient avancés vers nous, et plus il leur serait difficile en rebroussant chemin, d’arriver à Londres[Pg lxix] avant nous; que c’était la prise de cette grande ville qui devait faire son unique objet; que les succès qu’il pourrait avoir ailleurs n’auraient jamais rien de décisif, tandis que tout allait être perdu sans ressource dans une heure, s’il venait à être battu.

The prince, who thought he was invincible because he had never been defeated, challenged by enemies he looked down on too much, seeing at their head the son of his father's rival, proud and arrogant as he was, poorly advised, perhaps betrayed, forgetting all other plans in that moment, couldn't bring himself to deny him a single day of battle. I asked him for a quarter of an hour of private audience. There, I threw myself at his feet in vain; I pointed out in vain that he was still missing half of his army, that most of those who had returned no longer had shields, a type of defensive weapon without which they couldn't fight effectively; that they were all exhausted from fatigue after a long run the night before; that for two days many hadn't eaten due to a lack of bread; that we should focus on defending Inverness; that it would even be wiser to abandon it and put the river, near which the city is built, between the enemies and us; that at worst we could retreat into the nearby mountains; that it was there he would truly be invincible; that we would remain in control of the part of the coast where the reinforcements in troops and money we were expecting would arrive; that as soon as we received them, we would march toward England along that same coast, as previously agreed; that the further the enemies advanced toward us, the more difficult it would be for them to retrace their steps and reach London before us; that capturing that great city should be his sole focus; that any successes he might have elsewhere would never be decisive, while everything would be lost without recourse in an hour if he were to be beaten.

Enfin, le trouvant inébranlable dans la résolution prise de combattre à quelque prix que ce fût, je fis céder mon penchant à mon devoir. Je le quittai pour la première fois, je me retirai en hâte à Inverness, pour y brûler tous mes papiers, et y songer aux moyens de conserver à votre Majesté la partie de ses troupes qui ne périrait dans l’action.

Enfin, seeing that he was unshakeable in his decision to fight at any cost, I let my inclination yield to my duty. I left him for the first time, hurried back to Inverness to burn all my papers, and think about how to save for Your Majesty the part of your troops that wouldn’t perish in the battle.

Je vis avant la fin du jour le spectacle le plus frappant de la faiblesse humaine: le prince fut vaincu en un instant. Jamais déroute plus entière que la sienne.

Je vis avant la fin du jour le spectacle le plus frappant de la faiblesse humaine: le prince fut vaincu en un instant. Jamais déroute plus entière que la sienne.

TRANSLATION

Translation

The Prince who believed himself invincible because he had not yet been beaten, defied by enemies whom he thoroughly despised, seeing at their head the son of the rival of his father; proud and haughty as he was, badly advised, perhaps betrayed, forgetting at this moment every other object, could not bring himself to decline battle even for a single day. I requested a quarter of an hour’s private audience. There I threw myself in vain at his feet. In vain I represented to him that he was still without half his army; that the great part of those who had returned had no longer targets—a kind of defensive armour without which they were unable to fight with advantage; that they were all worn out with fatigue by a long march made on the previous night, and for two days many of them had not eaten at all for want of bread; that it was necessary to fall back to defend Inverness; that it would be even more prudent to abandon that town, and to place between the enemy and ourselves the river near which this town is built; that if the worst came to the worst, we might betake ourselves to the neighbouring mountains—there it was that he would be truly invincible; there we would remain masters of that part of the coast, at which supplies of arms and of money ought to be arriving, and as soon as these reached us, we should march towards England by that same coast as had already been arranged; that the more the enemy should advance towards us, the greater would be their difficulty to retrace their steps so as to get to London before us; the capture of that great city should be made his one object, for successes that he might achieve elsewhere would have no decisive value, while, in a single hour, all would be lost without hope of recovery if he should chance to be beaten.

The Prince, believing he was invincible since he hadn't been defeated yet, scoffed at enemies he thoroughly despised, especially the son of his father's rival. Proud and arrogant, and perhaps poorly advised or even betrayed, he momentarily forgot everything else and couldn’t bring himself to postpone the battle for even a day. I asked for a private audience for just fifteen minutes. There, I implored him in vain. I pointed out that he was still missing half his army; that most of those who had returned were without shields—a type of armor necessary for fighting effectively; that they were all exhausted from a long march made the night before, and many hadn’t eaten for two days due to a lack of bread. I argued that it was essential to retreat to defend Inverness; that it would be wiser to abandon that town and position ourselves by the river near it, creating a barrier between us and the enemy. If things got really bad, we could take refuge in the nearby mountains—where he would truly be unbeatable. There, we would control the coast where supplies of arms and money should be arriving, and as soon as those arrived, we could proceed towards England along that same coast as already planned. The further the enemy advanced toward us, the harder it would be for them to backtrack and reach London before us. Capturing that great city should be his primary goal because any victories he might achieve elsewhere wouldn’t hold any decisive value, and a single defeat could lead to everything being lost without hope of recovery.

In the end, finding him immovable in the resolve he had taken to fight at any cost, I made my desire yield to my duty. I left him for the first time. I retired in haste to Inverness, there to burn all my papers,[Pg lxx] and there to think over the means of preserving for your Majesty that portion of the [French] troops which might survive the action. I saw before the end of the day, the most striking spectacle of human weakness—the Prince was vanquished in an instant; never was a defeat more complete than his.

In the end, seeing that he was resolute in his decision to fight no matter what, I chose to let my desires give way to my obligations. I left him for the first time and hurried back to Inverness to destroy all my papers,[Pg lxx] and to think about how to save for your Majesty the part of the [French] troops that might survive the battle. By the end of the day, I witnessed the most striking display of human frailty—the Prince was defeated in an instant; there had never been a more complete defeat than his.

THE WANDERINGS OF PRINCE CHARLES IN THE HEBRIDES

This narrative by Neil Maceachain, the guide of Prince Charles and Flora Macdonald over the seas to Skye, appeared in the New Monthly Magazine for 1840. As a magazine article three-quarters of a century old is nearly as inaccessible as a manuscript, the Council of the Society authorised its inclusion in this volume as a fitting addition to the numerous narratives of the ’Forty-five collected by the Society.

This story by Neil Maceachain, who guided Prince Charles and Flora Macdonald across the seas to Skye, was published in the New Monthly Magazine in 1840. Since a magazine article that is almost seventy-five years old is almost as hard to find as a manuscript, the Society's Council approved its inclusion in this volume as a suitable addition to the many accounts of the ’Forty-five gathered by the Society.

In the magazine the article is prefaced with a note by the editor, Theodore Hook, who states that it was purchased from a hairdresser in Paris who claimed to be the son of the writer, and who, as Hook believed, must have been a son of Neil Maceachain. This, however, was impossible, as Neil had but one son who survived infancy—a son who had a far more distinguished career.

In the magazine, the article starts with a note from the editor, Theodore Hook, who mentions that it was bought from a hairdresser in Paris who said he was the writer's son, and Hook thought he must have been a son of Neil Maceachain. However, this was impossible, as Neil only had one son who survived infancy—a son who had a much more distinguished career.

The fact is that when Neil died, his son was in garrison at Calais. The father’s papers were made over to the custody of a Mr. Macnab, a Highland exile residing in France. At the Revolution, Macnab was imprisoned, his effects were seized and scattered, and Neil Maceachain’s papers were lost. Probably at that time the vendor had obtained the manuscript.

The truth is that when Neil died, his son was stationed at Calais. The father’s papers were given to a Mr. Macnab, a Highland exile living in France. During the Revolution, Macnab was jailed, his belongings were taken and spread out, and Neil Maceachain’s papers went missing. It's likely that the vendor acquired the manuscript around that time.

My attention was drawn to the paper about twenty years ago, and I determined to find out what its claims to authenticity might be. In one of my journeys through the Outer Hebrides, when compiling the Itinerary of Prince Charles,[77] I was accompanied by the late Father Allan[Pg lxxi] Macdonald, priest of Eriska and Dean of the Isles. We took a copy of the article with us, and traced on the spot the wanderings here described. We were much gratified; local tradition as well as topography completely corroborated the narrative. It could only have been written by one thoroughly acquainted with the islands. There could be no doubt of its genuineness, and it must have been written by Neil Maceachain.

My attention was caught by the paper about twenty years ago, and I decided to find out how authentic its claims were. During one of my trips to the Outer Hebrides, while putting together the Itinerary of Prince Charles, [77] I was joined by the late Father Allan[Pg lxxi] Macdonald, the priest of Eriska and Dean of the Isles. We brought a copy of the article with us and traced the routes described right at the location. We were really pleased; local traditions and the geography completely backed up the story. It could only have been written by someone who knew the islands very well. There was no doubt it was genuine, and it must have been written by Neil Maceachain.

In the Itinerary there is a short account of Neil, to which the reader is referred. Briefly, he was one of the Macdonald-Maceachains of Howbeg, in South Uist, a sept of the Clanranald. Neil was educated in France for the priesthood, but abandoned his intention of taking orders, and returned to South Uist, where he acted as parish schoolmaster and tutor in the family of Clanranald, who then resided at Nunton in Benbecula. The old chief attached Neil to Prince Charles when in hiding in the islands, believing that his scholarship, his knowledge of languages, and his accomplishments as a musician might be useful to the Prince.

In the Itinerary, there’s a brief account of Neil, which the reader can check out. In short, he was one of the Macdonald-Maceachains from Howbeg in South Uist, part of the Clanranald. Neil studied in France to become a priest but decided against it and went back to South Uist, where he worked as a parish schoolmaster and tutor for the Clanranald family, who were staying at Nunton in Benbecula at the time. The old chief connected Neil with Prince Charles while he was hiding in the islands, thinking that Neil’s education, language skills, and musical talent could be helpful to the Prince.

It must be remembered that the narrative can be accepted as trustworthy only for the occasions on which Neil was actually with the Prince. He met him on his first arrival at Benbecula, but he did not accompany him on his journey to Harris and Lewis; he was, however, again with him on his return to Benbecula and South Uist. Neil’s accounts, therefore, of the Prince’s adventures when away from South Uist are only from hearsay and not to be entirely depended on. In the Itinerary I followed for that part of the Prince’s wanderings the narrative of Donald Macleod of Gualtergil, who was then his companion and guide.

It should be noted that the story can only be considered reliable for the times when Neil was actually with the Prince. He met him when he first arrived at Benbecula, but he didn’t go with him on his trip to Harris and Lewis. However, he was with him again on the return to Benbecula and South Uist. Therefore, Neil’s stories about the Prince’s experiences when he was away from South Uist are just hear-say and can’t be fully trusted. In the Itinerary I used for that part of the Prince’s travels, I referenced the account of Donald Macleod of Gualtergil, who was his companion and guide at the time.

Not the least interesting portion of the narrative is the account of the meeting between Flora Macdonald and Prince Charles. So much fiction mingles with accounts of the incident, in prose, in verse, and in pictures, that[Pg lxxii] it is well to get the simple facts of the story. There were no English soldiers in the Hebrides; the duty of hunting the Prince was entrusted to the independent companies of Highlanders generally referred to as the Macdonald, Macleod, and Campbell militia. It must be remembered, however, that the Navy was relentless in the pursuit. Flora’s stepfather, Hugh Macdonald, was one of the chief men of the Sleat Clan which supported the Government, while Flora herself was a Clanranald.[78] She had been educated in her childhood with Clanranald’s family, and later she had been a good deal with Sir Alexander and Lady Margaret Macdonald in Edinburgh. Flora was dearly loved by both the families, and was a very suitable person to conduct Prince Charles from Clanranald territory to Skye. Moreover, the moment was opportune, for Sir Alexander Macdonald was in attendance on the Duke of Cumberland at Fort Augustus, and Lady Margaret, who had taken the utmost interest in the Prince and had secretly sent him comforts to South Uist, was at home at Monkstat.

Not the least interesting part of the story is the meeting between Flora Macdonald and Prince Charles. So much fiction mixes with accounts of the incident, in prose, verse, and pictures, that[Pg lxxii] it’s good to get the simple facts of the story. There were no English soldiers in the Hebrides; the responsibility of tracking down the Prince fell to the independent companies of Highlanders generally known as the Macdonald, Macleod, and Campbell militia. However, it should be noted that the Navy was relentless in the pursuit. Flora's stepfather, Hugh Macdonald, was one of the leading figures of the Sleat Clan supporting the Government, while Flora herself was a Clanranald.[78] She had been raised in her childhood with Clanranald’s family, and later she spent a lot of time with Sir Alexander and Lady Margaret Macdonald in Edinburgh. Flora was dearly loved by both families and was very suitable to escort Prince Charles from Clanranald territory to Skye. Moreover, the timing was right, as Sir Alexander Macdonald was with the Duke of Cumberland at Fort Augustus, and Lady Margaret, who had taken a keen interest in the Prince and secretly sent him supplies to South Uist, was home at Monkstat.

Hugh Macdonald has always been suspected of collusion with the Prince,[79] but this is the only narrative in which the fact is stated categorically. Charles declared that he felt safe while he was with the Macdonalds.[80] Flora had but one meeting with Charles Edward in South Uist, on June 21st, when the plan of escape to Skye was arranged (p. 251). They met again on the evening of Saturday, June 28th, at Benbecula, whence Flora, Neil, and the Prince went by boat to Skye. Sunday night was spent at Kingsburgh’s house, and the narrative breaks off at the interesting moment when the party was on the way from Monkstat to Kingsburgh. What happened after that is found in various narratives of The Lyon in Mourning. Briefly, the Prince spent the night at Kingsburgh House. Next day, he walked to Portree, changing his female clothes[Pg lxxiii] in a wood on the road. The Prince walked by private paths and Flora rode by the main highway. At Portree the Prince said farewell to Flora for ever.

Hugh Macdonald has always been suspected of working with the Prince, but this is the only story where that's stated outright. Charles said he felt safe while he was with the Macdonalds. Flora had only one meeting with Charles Edward in South Uist on June 21st, when they planned the escape to Skye (p. 251). They met again on the evening of Saturday, June 28th, at Benbecula, from where Flora, Neil, and the Prince took a boat to Skye. They spent Sunday night at Kingsburgh’s house, and the story ends at the intriguing moment when the group was heading from Monkstat to Kingsburgh. What happened next can be found in various accounts of The Lyon in Mourning. In short, the Prince spent the night at Kingsburgh House. The next day, he walked to Portree, changing out of his female clothes in a woods along the way. The Prince took private paths while Flora rode on the main road. At Portree, the Prince said goodbye to Flora for good.

Such is the story, and it needs no embellishment. Flora’s services to the Prince were matchless; she saved him at the moment when General Campbell with his militia and a naval expedition were on the point of capturing him. She herself was taken prisoner a few days later.[81]

Such is the story, and it doesn’t need any embellishment. Flora’s contributions to the Prince were unparalleled; she saved him just as General Campbell and his militia, along with a naval expedition, were about to capture him. She was taken prisoner herself a few days later.[81]

At Portree Neil Maceachain also said farewell to Prince Charles, who with Malcolm and Murdoch Macleod went that night to the island of Raasa. The following day the Prince returned to Skye, and left two days later for the mainland. Thus finished his wanderings in the Hebrides.

At Portree, Neil Maceachain also said goodbye to Prince Charles, who, along with Malcolm and Murdoch Macleod, went that night to the island of Raasa. The next day, the Prince returned to Skye and left for the mainland two days later. Thus ended his travels in the Hebrides.

Neil evaded capture after the escape of Prince Charles from Skye; in September he rejoined him at Arisaig, and in the ship L’Heureux accompanied the Prince to France. There he joined the French army, at first as a lieutenant in the Regiment d’Albanie, of which the command was given to Lochiel, and afterwards in the Scots regiment of Lord Ogilvy, the Jacobite exile. Ogilvy’s regiment was disbanded after the Peace of Paris in 1763, and Neil passed the rest of his life, first at Sedan and afterwards at Sancerre, in the province of Berry, on a pension of three hundred livres (about £30). He died at Sancerre in 1788. When he left Scotland Neil dropped the name of Maceachain, retaining only that of Macdonald.

Neil avoided capture after Prince Charles escaped from Skye; in September, he rejoined him at Arisaig and, on the ship L’Heureux, accompanied the Prince to France. There, he joined the French army, initially as a lieutenant in the Regiment d’Albanie, which was commanded by Lochiel, and later in the Scots regiment of Lord Ogilvy, the Jacobite exile. Ogilvy’s regiment was disbanded after the Peace of Paris in 1763, and Neil spent the rest of his life, first in Sedan and then in Sancerre, in the province of Berry, on a pension of three hundred livres (about £30). He passed away in Sancerre in 1788. When he left Scotland, Neil dropped the name Maceachain, keeping only the name Macdonald.

His only son became famous as one of Napoleon’s generals—Marshal Macdonald, Duke of Tarentum.

His only son became well-known as one of Napoleon’s generals—Marshal Macdonald, Duke of Tarentum.

NARRATIVE OF LUDOVICK GRANT OF GRANT

In 1745 Sir James Grant was the head of the family. His father at the Revolution had taken the side of King William, and had been a member of the Convention of[Pg lxxiv] Estates which declared King James’s forfeiture. He had raised a regiment and had incurred heavy expenses in the service of the new Government, but in spite of frequent applications no repayment had ever been made to him. Sir James’s elder brother, Alexander, succeeded his father. He was a distinguished soldier, who served the Government faithfully, and rose to the rank of Brigadier-General. In the ’Fifteen he was Lord-Lieutenant of Banff and Inverness, and was appointed Captain of Edinburgh Castle. In 1717 he was informed that the Government had no further occasion for his services. He died in 1719, and was succeeded by his brother James, who by a special grant inherited the baronetcy of his father-in-law, Sir Humphrey Colquhoun of Luss. Sir James Grant was member of parliament for the county of Inverness from 1722 to 1741, when a quarrel with Duncan Forbes of Culloden forced him to relinquish the constituency. He then became member for the Elgin burghs, for which he sat until his death in 1747. Although Sir James was a Whig in politics, it may be that at one time he had dealings with the Jacobite Court. It is remarkable that in 1721, while the Atterbury Plot was being hatched, and at the very time that Christopher Layer was in Rome on that business, Sir James Grant was created a peer by the Chevalier.[82]

In 1745, Sir James Grant was the head of the family. His father had sided with King William during the Revolution and was part of the Convention of[Pg lxxiv] Estates that declared King James's forfeiture. He raised a regiment and incurred significant expenses serving the new Government, but despite numerous requests, he was never repaid. Sir James's older brother, Alexander, took over after their father. He was a respected soldier who served the Government loyally and rose to the rank of Brigadier-General. During the 'Fifteen, he was the Lord-Lieutenant of Banff and Inverness and was appointed Captain of Edinburgh Castle. In 1717, he was told that the Government no longer needed his services. He died in 1719 and was succeeded by his brother James, who inherited the baronetcy from his father-in-law, Sir Humphrey Colquhoun of Luss, by special grant. Sir James Grant was a member of parliament for the county of Inverness from 1722 to 1741, when a dispute with Duncan Forbes of Culloden prompted him to give up the constituency. He then became the member for the Elgin burghs, serving until his death in 1747. Although Sir James was a Whig politically, it’s possible that he had dealings with the Jacobite Court at one time. Notably, in 1721, while the Atterbury Plot was being organized and just as Christopher Layer was in Rome for that purpose, Sir James Grant was made a peer by the Chevalier.[82]

On his arrival in Scotland, Prince Charles wrote to Grant requesting his co-operation in much the same terms as he wrote to known Jacobite adherents.[83] Sir James, who was now sixty-six years old, determined to keep out of trouble. He handed over the management of his clan and property to his eldest son, Ludovick, and on the pretext of attending to his parliamentary duties, he[Pg lxxv] went to London, where he remained throughout the Rising.

On arriving in Scotland, Prince Charles wrote to Grant asking for his support using similar language as he did with known Jacobite supporters. Sir James, now sixty-six, decided to steer clear of trouble. He passed the management of his clan and property to his eldest son, Ludovick, and under the guise of attending to his parliamentary duties, he[Pg lxxv] went to London, where he stayed for the entirety of the Rising.

Before leaving Scotland, Sir James pointed out to his son that the family had received scant reward for eminent services in the past, and he advised him that whatever happened the clan should not be subdivided. He strongly opposed Duncan Forbes’s scheme of independent companies. The clan should remain passive, prepared to defend its own territory, and only act in the event of its being attacked. This policy Ludovick carried out, and in doing so incurred the grave suspicion of the Government. It is indeed difficult to believe that, until the final retreat of the Jacobites and the approach of Cumberland, the acting Chief of the Grants was not sitting on the fence.

Before leaving Scotland, Sir James told his son that the family hadn't received enough recognition for their past contributions, and he advised him that no matter what, the clan shouldn’t be divided. He was strongly against Duncan Forbes’s plan for independent companies. The clan should stay neutral, ready to defend its own land, and only take action if they were attacked. Ludovick followed this approach, and as a result, he raised serious concerns from the Government. It's hard to believe that, until the final retreat of the Jacobites and the arrival of Cumberland, the acting Chief of the Grants wasn’t just sitting on the sidelines.

The Grant estates were in two distinct portions, those around Castle Grant in Strathspey and those in Urquhart and Glenmoriston on the western side of Loch Ness. Although the Strathspey Grants were accounted a Whig clan, the Grants of Urquhart and Glenmoriston were notoriously Jacobite. When the Rising took place, Ludovick Grant wrote to his outlying retainers, not forbidding them to join the Prince, but peremptorily forbidding them to move without his sanction. Eventually they went ‘out’ in spite of his orders, but the Strathspey men stood loyally by their chief.

The Grant estates were divided into two main areas: those around Castle Grant in Strathspey and those in Urquhart and Glenmoriston on the western side of Loch Ness. While the Strathspey Grants were considered a Whig clan, the Grants of Urquhart and Glenmoriston were known for being Jacobite supporters. When the Rising happened, Ludovick Grant wrote to his distant retainers, not explicitly telling them to avoid joining the Prince, but firmly warning them not to act without his approval. Eventually, they joined in spite of his orders, but the Strathspey men remained loyal to their chief.

The whole story of the rising in Urquhart and Glenmoriston and the action of Ludovick Grant towards the Government and his clansmen has been told within recent years in a most interesting volume by Mr. William Mackay,[84] to which the reader is referred. The narrative printed here is Grant’s own apologia to the Government, prepared with legal assistance after the Rising. The text tells its own story, but four points may be referred to here, points which it gave Ludovick Grant much[Pg lxxvi] trouble to explain. First, when Sir John Cope marched north in August 1745 he passed within ten miles of Castle Grant, yet the young chief neither visited him nor sent him assistance.[85] Second, when President Duncan Forbes asked him to furnish two independent companies for the service of Government, he declined, on the ostensible ground that two companies were too insignificant a contingent for so important a clan as the Grants. He eventually was persuaded to send one company,[86] whose only service was to garrison Inverness Castle under Major George Grant, Ludovick’s uncle. The castle surrendered to Prince Charles in February after two days’ siege, and the commandant was dismissed the service. Third, Grant marched his men to Strathbogie to attack Lord Lewis Gordon’s men in December without orders from Lord Loudoun, then commanding in the north,[87] for which he incurred Lord Loudoun’s censure. Fourth, when Grant had gone to Aberdeen in March, five of his principal gentlemen made a treaty of neutrality[88] with the Jacobites under Lord George Murray and Lord Nairn, by which the Prince’s people were to get supplies from the Grant country in return for protection from raiding.

The entire story of the uprising in Urquhart and Glenmoriston and Ludovick Grant's actions towards the Government and his clansmen has been shared recently in a fascinating book by Mr. William Mackay, [84] which the reader is encouraged to check out. The account here is Grant’s own apologia to the Government, prepared with legal help after the Rising. The text tells its own story, but four points are worth noting here, points that caused Ludovick Grant a lot of trouble to clarify. First, when Sir John Cope marched north in August 1745, he came within ten miles of Castle Grant, yet the young chief neither visited him nor offered him any help.[85] Second, when President Duncan Forbes asked him to provide two independent companies for the Government's service, he refused, claiming that two companies were too small a force for such an important clan as the Grants. He was eventually convinced to send one company,[86] which only served to garrison Inverness Castle under Major George Grant, Ludovick’s uncle. The castle surrendered to Prince Charles in February after a two-day siege, and the commandant was dismissed from service. Third, Grant marched his men to Strathbogie to attack Lord Lewis Gordon’s men in December without orders from Lord Loudoun, who was in command in the north,[87] which led to Lord Loudoun's censure. Fourth, when Grant went to Aberdeen in March, five of his leading gentlemen made a neutrality treaty[88] with the Jacobites under Lord George Murray and Lord Nairn, which allowed the Prince’s supporters to get supplies from Grant's territory in exchange for protection from raids.

This narrative is occasionally referred to in Sir William Fraser’s Chiefs of Grant, but is not included in that work. The text is printed from the original manuscripts in the Public Record Office.

This story is sometimes mentioned in Sir William Fraser’s Chiefs of Grant, but it isn't part of that book. The text is taken from the original manuscripts at the Public Record Office.

THE CASE OF THE REV. JOHN GRANT AND OF GRANTS OF SHEUGLY

To show his zeal for the Government after Culloden, Ludovick Grant marched his Strathspey men, eight hundred strong, into Urquhart and Glenmoriston, and under threat[Pg lxxvii] of fire and sword arrested his clansmen who had been ‘out.’ The fighting men were handed over to the Duke of Cumberland, and most of them were transported. Grant of Sheugly and his eldest son had not actually been out but were accused of urging their people to join the Jacobites. They were sent to London as prisoners along with the Reverend John Grant, minister of Urquhart. Ludovick asserted to the Duke of Newcastle that the minister ‘was at all their consultations and never attempted to dissuade the people from joining the rebells, but on the contrary gave over praying for his Majesty, and after the battle of Culloden he concealed some of the rebells and had their money in keeping.... Mr. Grant concealed from me where three of the rebells were hid by his direction....’[89]

To demonstrate his loyalty to the Government after Culloden, Ludovick Grant led his eight hundred Strathspey men into Urquhart and Glenmoriston, and under threat of violence, arrested his clansmen who had been ‘out.’ The fighting men were handed over to the Duke of Cumberland, and most of them were deported. Grant of Sheugly and his oldest son hadn’t actually participated but were accused of encouraging their people to join the Jacobites. They were sent to London as prisoners along with Reverend John Grant, the minister of Urquhart. Ludovick claimed to the Duke of Newcastle that the minister “was involved in all their meetings and never tried to dissuade the people from joining the rebels, but instead stopped praying for His Majesty, and after the battle of Culloden, he hid some of the rebels and kept their money.... Mr. Grant hid from me where three of the rebels were concealed by his direction....”[Pg lxxvii]

The reader will find the minister’s own story in the text, and must judge of its truth. Perhaps Grant protests too much, for Mr. Mackay informs me that the tradition of the parish is that he was a thorough Jacobite. It is perfectly evident, however, that the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General thought lightly of the case both against the minister and young Sheugly, or they would never have remitted them to the court at Edinburgh, when it was notorious that no Scottish jury would convict a Jacobite.

The reader will find the minister’s own story in the text and must judge its truth. Maybe Grant protests too much, since Mr. Mackay tells me that the local tradition is that he was a full-blown Jacobite. However, it’s clear that the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General didn’t take the case against the minister and young Sheugly seriously, or they wouldn’t have sent them to the court in Edinburgh, especially when it was well-known that no Scottish jury would convict a Jacobite.

The prisoners, on December 4th, ‘sisted [surrendered] themselves in court [at Edinburgh] to answer for alleadged Rebellion and all such matters as on his Majesty’s behalf should be objected against them.’[90] They were admitted to bail and there the matter ended.

The prisoners, on December 4th, surrendered themselves in court at Edinburgh to answer for alleged rebellion and any other issues that the King might raise against them. [90] They were granted bail, and that was the end of it.

The Presbytery records show that no ecclesiastical proceedings were taken against the minister, though probably that does not mean much. At that time it may well be[Pg lxxviii] believed that every minister and elder in the Highlands sympathised with the hunted Jacobites. The only minister of the Church of Scotland who was dealt with for disloyalty in the ’Forty-five was Thomas Man, minister of Dunkeld. He was tried before the Commission of General Assembly in May 1747. The libel against him was found relevant, and the charges partly confessed or found proven. The sentence was gentle—five months’ suspension from his duties.[91]

The Presbytery records indicate that no church actions were taken against the minister, though that probably doesn't mean much. At that time, it was likely believed that every minister and elder in the Highlands supported the hunted Jacobites. The only Church of Scotland minister who faced consequences for disloyalty during the 'Forty-five was Thomas Man, the minister of Dunkeld. He was tried by the Commission of General Assembly in May 1747. The charges against him were deemed relevant, and he partly admitted to the accusations or they were proven. The punishment was lenient—he was suspended from his duties for five months.[91]

The manuscript of this case is preserved in the Record Office.

The manuscript of this case is kept in the Record Office.

GROSSETT’S MEMORIAL AND ACCOUNTS

Walter Grossett[92] of Logie was the grandson of a certain Alexander Grossett, or Grosier, or Grosiert, a Frenchman, who came over to Great Britain in the Civil Wars and served King Charles I. in the army. He settled in Scotland, and died there, leaving a son Alexander. This son purchased the small estate of Logie, near Dunfermline. He was an ardent Covenanter, and retired to Holland at the time of the persecutions. Alexander left an only son, Archibald, who married Eupham Muirhead, a daughter of the laird of Bredisholm, in North Lanarkshire, by whom he had three sons; of these Walter was the eldest. Through his mother, he was a cousin of Sir John Shaw of Greenock, and was also nearly connected with the families of Lord Blantyre and the Earl of Cathcart.

Walter Grossett of Logie was the grandson of a certain Alexander Grossett, or Grosier, or Grosiert, a Frenchman who came to Great Britain during the Civil Wars and served King Charles I in the army. He settled in Scotland and died there, leaving behind a son named Alexander. This son bought the small estate of Logie, near Dunfermline. He was a passionate Covenanter and moved to Holland during the persecutions. Alexander had only one son, Archibald, who married Eupham Muirhead, the daughter of the laird of Bredisholm in North Lanarkshire, and they had three sons; Walter was the eldest. Through his mother, he was a cousin of Sir John Shaw of Greenock and was also closely related to the families of Lord Blantyre and the Earl of Cathcart.

In 1745 this Walter Grossett was Collector of Customs at Alloa, an office he had held for seventeen years. He was exceedingly active in his vocation, and very successful[Pg lxxix] in the prosecution of smugglers. A short time before the Rising, at great risk to himself, he made one of the largest seizures of smuggled tobacco ever made in Scotland, thus enriching the Treasury by several thousand pounds.[93] Early in the ’Forty-five, eight days before Prince Charles entered Edinburgh, Grossett was commissioned by Lord Advocate Craigie to seize the boats and shipping on the northern shore of the Firth of Forth to prevent their falling into the hands of the Jacobite army, then assembling at Perth. Apparently his performance gave satisfaction, for he was promoted to be Collector at Leith, and he was constantly employed thereafter by the military authorities and the Lord Justice-Clerk, both in executive work and in secret service. His services were so highly approved by the Duke of Cumberland that H.R.H. promised him ‘his countenance on every occasion.’[94] After the suppression of the Rising, he was employed by the Duke of Newcastle, Secretary of State, to collect evidence for the prosecution of the rebel lords and other Jacobite prisoners, and to escort the witnesses for the prosecution to London. For his services to Government he was promoted to the office of Inspector-General of Customs in 1747, on the recommendation of the Duke of Cumberland.[95]

In 1745, Walter Grossett was the Collector of Customs at Alloa, a position he had held for seventeen years. He was very active in his job and had a lot of success in going after smugglers. A short time before the Rising, he took significant risks and made one of the largest seizures of smuggled tobacco ever recorded in Scotland, which brought in several thousand pounds for the Treasury. Early in the ’Forty-five, just eight days before Prince Charles entered Edinburgh, Grossett was tasked by Lord Advocate Craigie to seize the boats and shipping on the northern shore of the Firth of Forth to stop them from falling into the hands of the Jacobite army, which was gathering at Perth. His efforts seemed to be well-received, as he was promoted to Collector at Leith and was constantly employed afterward by the military authorities and the Lord Justice-Clerk for both executive tasks and secret operations. His work earned such high praise from the Duke of Cumberland that H.R.H. promised him “his support on every occasion.” After the suppression of the Rising, he was hired by the Duke of Newcastle, Secretary of State, to gather evidence for the prosecution of the rebel lords and other Jacobite prisoners, and to escort the prosecution witnesses to London. For his service to the Government, he was promoted to Inspector-General of Customs in 1747, on the recommendation of the Duke of Cumberland.

Grossett must have been a man of great personal courage, for he went about with his life in his hand. On one occasion, it is related, he saved the life of his cousin Sir John Shaw by entering the Jacobite camp (it is not stated when or where) and carrying him off in the disguise of a Jacobite officer.[96] His enemies, whether Jacobites or smugglers, perhaps both, wreaked terrible[Pg lxxx] vengeance on his house and his family, treating his wife so harshly that she died shortly afterwards.[97]

Grossett must have been a man of great personal courage, as he went about with his life at risk. One time, it’s said, he saved his cousin Sir John Shaw by sneaking into the Jacobite camp (the time and place aren’t mentioned) and rescuing him disguised as a Jacobite officer.[96] His enemies, whether they were Jacobites or smugglers, possibly both, took terrible revenge on his home and family, treating his wife so badly that she died shortly after.[97]

It is pleasant to find on record a friendly action of Grossett to a condemned prisoner. Patrick Murray, a goldsmith of Stirling, was taken prisoner at Airdrie in November 1745 by some country people. To Grossett, who was present, he declared that he surrendered in accordance with Marshal Wade’s proclamation of 30th October offering his Majesty’s clemency to all rebels who would surrender before 11th November.[98] Grossett had been summoned to Murray’s trial at Carlisle as a witness for the defence, but was prevented from being present owing to his secret services detaining him in London. Murray was tried on September 24th, 1746, found guilty, and condemned to death. The terms of his surrender were not pled at his trial, and Grossett sent in a memorial stating the facts of the arrestment:[99] it was of no avail, Murray was executed on November 15th.

It’s nice to see a record of Grossett’s kind act towards a condemned prisoner. Patrick Murray, a goldsmith from Stirling, was captured at Airdrie in November 1745 by some locals. He told Grossett, who was there at the time, that he surrendered based on Marshal Wade’s proclamation from October 30, which offered clemency from the King to all rebels who surrendered before November 11.[98] Grossett had been called to testify at Murray’s trial in Carlisle as a defense witness, but he couldn’t attend because he was occupied with secret duties in London. Murray was tried on September 24, 1746, found guilty, and sentenced to death. The conditions of his surrender weren’t considered during his trial, and Grossett submitted a memorial detailing the circumstances of the arrest:[99] it was pointless, as Murray was executed on November 15.

Grossett tells the story of his executive work and of the expenses he incurred in the pages printed in this volume. He mentions that he gave evidence in 1747 at the trial of Lord Provost Archibald Stewart for losing Edinburgh to Prince Charles, but he does not mention the lines in which he is held up to shame and ridicule, along with the magistrates and the clergy of Edinburgh, in a poem published after the trial, which was burned by the[Pg lxxxi] hangman, and which brought the printer to the pillory and to ruin:

Grossett shares his experiences from his executive work and the costs he faced, detailed on the pages in this volume. He notes that he testified in 1747 during the trial of Lord Provost Archibald Stewart for losing Edinburgh to Prince Charles. However, he doesn’t mention the lines where he is mocked and shamed, along with the magistrates and clergy of Edinburgh, in a poem published after the trial. This poem was burned by the[Pg lxxxi] executioner, which led to the printer’s disgrace and downfall:

‘And stupid Gr—t next must take the field,
And He, (with fifty,) swore he would not yield,
To those brave Hundreds (who deserv’d the rope,)
That did beat Thousands under Sir J—n C—pe.’[100]

Judging from the report of the Duke of Cumberland’s Secretary and the Solicitor to the Treasury (p. 400), Grossett’s claim for £3709 was justified. I have, however, failed to discover if the sum was actually paid, and family papers throw some doubt on this. In a memorandum by his eldest son it is stated that he was a sufferer for his services to Government by many thousand pounds. This may mean that his claim was never liquidated, though after the report of the official scrutineers that hardly seems probable. It is more likely that young Grossett refers to the legal expenses incurred by his father in defending himself against the ‘scandalous Libells and groundless and vexatious lawsuits,’ which he had to meet as the result of his anti-Jacobite and anti-smuggling zeal, together with the loss of professional perquisites referred to on pp. 336 and 337.[101]

Based on the report from the Duke of Cumberland’s Secretary and the Solicitor to the Treasury (p. 400), Grossett's claim for £3709 was warranted. However, I haven't been able to find out if the amount was actually paid, and family documents raise some doubts about this. In a note from his eldest son, it's mentioned that he suffered financially for his services to the government by several thousand pounds. This might imply that his claim was never settled, though that seems unlikely after the report from the official auditors. It’s more probable that young Grossett is referring to the legal costs his father incurred defending himself against the "scandalous libels and baseless and annoying lawsuits" that arose from his strong opposition to Jacobitism and smuggling, along with the loss of professional benefits mentioned on pp. 336 and 337.[101]

A gauger has always been a most unpopular personage[Pg lxxxii] in Scotland, and Grossett rendered himself doubly odious by his action as informer against the unfortunate Jacobite prisoners. He was the victim of shoals of frivolous actions in the courts, brought by persons determined to wear him out in law expenses. He was strongly advised by the Secretary of State to leave the country and go abroad for a few years, and he was told that the Treasury would give him full pay as Inspector-General during his absence on leave. How long this leave on full pay continued I do not know, but Grossett went to Italy. His wife had been a Miss de Vlieger, the daughter of a Dutch merchant and Government financier, and it may be that this fact stimulated Grossett to international financial enterprise. Along with the Earl of Rochfort, British minister at the Sardinian Court, and other gentlemen, he entered into silver and copper mining adventures in Savoy, which proved utter failures. He returned to England a completely ruined man, and died broken-hearted, in 1760, at his son’s house in London.

A gauger has always been a really unpopular person in Scotland, and Grossett made himself even more hated by acting as an informer against the unfortunate Jacobite prisoners. He was the target of numerous frivolous lawsuits brought by people determined to drain him financially. The Secretary of State strongly advised him to leave the country and go abroad for a few years, promising that the Treasury would pay him in full as Inspector-General during his leave. I don’t know how long this fully paid leave lasted, but Grossett went to Italy. His wife was a Miss de Vlieger, the daughter of a Dutch merchant and government financier, which may have inspired Grossett to pursue international financial ventures. Along with the Earl of Rochfort, the British minister at the Sardinian Court, and other gentlemen, he got involved in silver and copper mining projects in Savoy, which ended in complete failures. He returned to England utterly broke and died heartbroken in 1760 at his son’s house in London.

Walter Grossett had been heir-presumptive to his uncle, John Muirhead of Bredisholm, the last of the male representatives of that ancient family and of the Muirheads of that Ilk. Muirhead had helped Grossett in his mining speculations, and had become so involved that he was obliged to sell the reversion of the estate in order to live. He wished the property kept in the family, so he sold it to Walter Grossett’s nephew, the son of his youngest brother, James, a prosperous merchant of Lisbon, who assumed the name of Muirhead. James’s son John married a granddaughter of Lord George Murray—Lady Jean Murray, daughter of the third Duke of Atholl.[102] He is the ancestor of the family which, in the female line but retaining the name of Muirhead, still possesses the property of Bredisholm.

Walter Grossett was the presumptive heir to his uncle, John Muirhead of Bredisholm, the last male member of that ancient family and the Muirheads of that Ilk. Muirhead supported Grossett in his mining ventures and became so involved that he had to sell the rights to the estate just to get by. He wanted the property to stay in the family, so he sold it to Walter Grossett’s nephew, the son of his youngest brother, James, a successful merchant in Lisbon, who took on the Muirhead name. James’s son John married Lady Jean Murray, a granddaughter of Lord George Murray and the daughter of the third Duke of Atholl. [102] He is the ancestor of the family that, through the female line but keeping the Muirhead name, still owns the Bredisholm property.

[Pg lxxxiii]

[Pg lxxxiii]

Grossett’s second brother, Alexander, was a captain in Price’s regiment, and served on the staff at the battle of Culloden, where he was killed under circumstances related in the text (p. 336). His wife and children are on the list of recipients of gratuities from a Guildhall Relief Fund collected for sufferers in the campaign of the ’Forty-five (see Appendix, p. 429). The entry reads, ‘Captain Grossett’s widow and 4 children, £150.’ It was the largest individual sum distributed.

Grossett’s second brother, Alexander, was a captain in Price’s regiment and worked on the staff during the battle of Culloden, where he was killed under the circumstances described in the text (p. 336). His wife and children are included in the list of beneficiaries from a Guildhall Relief Fund raised for those affected during the campaign of ’Forty-five (see Appendix, p. 429). The entry states, ‘Captain Grossett’s widow and 4 children, £150.’ This was the largest individual amount given out.

Grossett’s narrative seems truthful and straightforward. Although presented in the unusual form of a commercial invoice, it is particularly interesting and useful in giving details of minor events of the campaign not generally mentioned, or at least not detailed elsewhere. He, however, would convey the impression that his enterprises were always successful, which was not the case. For instance, the Jacobites were successful in securing the passage of the Firth of Forth, yet Grossett does not make the reader understand this in his long account of the operation at pp. 353-358, and the same applies to other passages. Yet the description does not differ more from the Jacobite accounts than in modern times do the descriptions of operations as narrated by opposing belligerent generals.[103]

Grossett’s story comes across as honest and straightforward. Even though it's presented in the unusual format of a commercial invoice, it’s particularly interesting and helpful in providing details about minor events of the campaign that aren’t usually mentioned or at least aren’t detailed elsewhere. However, he tends to give the impression that his efforts were always successful, which wasn’t true. For example, the Jacobites succeeded in crossing the Firth of Forth, but Grossett doesn’t make this clear in his lengthy account of the operation on pages 353-358, and the same goes for other sections. Still, his description doesn’t differ much from the Jacobite accounts, just like modern descriptions of operations narrated by opposing military leaders.

Two services he was employed on are worthy of special notice—the release of the officers on parole (p. 364), and his participation in the distribution of the Guildhall Relief Fund (p. 374). The former service had been originally destined by Hawley for the company of Edinburgh volunteers under the command of John Home (author of Douglas), by whom it was indignantly refused.[104] The[Pg lxxxiv] latter, which is described in the Appendix, is particularly interesting at the present time of war, when similar funds are being distributed for similar purposes.

Two services he was involved in deserve special mention—the release of the officers on parole (p. 364) and his role in distributing the Guildhall Relief Fund (p. 374). The first service was initially intended by Hawley for the company of Edinburgh volunteers led by John Home (author of Douglas), who indignantly refused it. The[Pg lxxxiv] latter, detailed in the Appendix, is particularly relevant in today's wartime, as similar funds are being distributed for the same purposes.

The manuscripts of the ‘Memorial,’ the ‘Narrative,’ and ‘The Account of Money’ are in the Record Office. A remarkable coincidence procured the Correspondence printed on pp. 379-399. After the ‘Narrative’ was in type, my friend, Mr. Moir Bryce, President of the Old Edinburgh Club, sent me a packet of letters, most of them holograph, to look over and see if there was anything of interest in them. To my surprise and gratification, I found they were the identical original letters that Grossett quotes as authority for his transactions. Mr. Bryce, who had purchased the letters from a dealer, knew nothing of the history of their ownership. He subsequently generously presented me with the collection. The Report of Fawkener and Sharpe was lent to me by Miss Frances Grosett-Collins, Bredisholm, Chew Magna, Somerset. Miss Grosett-Collins also kindly lent me some family papers from which, along with documents preserved in the Record Office and the British Museum, these brief notes of her ancestor’s career have been compiled.

The manuscripts of the ‘Memorial,’ the ‘Narrative,’ and ‘The Account of Money’ are in the Record Office. A surprising coincidence led to the Correspondence printed on pages 379-399. After the ‘Narrative’ was typeset, my friend, Mr. Moir Bryce, who is the President of the Old Edinburgh Club, sent me a packet of letters, mostly handwritten, for me to review and see if any of them were interesting. To my surprise and delight, I discovered they were the original letters that Grossett cited as evidence for his transactions. Mr. Bryce, who had bought the letters from a dealer, was unaware of their ownership history. He later generously gave me the collection. The Report of Fawkener and Sharpe was lent to me by Miss Frances Grosett-Collins from Bredisholm, Chew Magna, Somerset. Miss Grosett-Collins also kindly lent me some family papers, which, along with documents in the Record Office and the British Museum, formed the basis for these brief notes on her ancestor’s career.

ACCOUNT OF THE BATTLES OF PRESTON, FALKIRK, AND CULLODEN

This is a beautifully written manuscript of sixty-two folios, small quarto, by Andrew Lumisden, private secretary to Prince Charles when in Scotland. Certain documents bound up with the manuscript give its history. It was originally written for the information of John Home, author of the tragedy of Douglas, when engaged in writing his history of the Rebellion. After Home’s death, it was presented by his nephew, John Home, W.S., to Macvey[Pg lxxxv] Napier, Librarian of the Signet Library. In 1840 Napier presented it to Mr. James Gibson Craig, W.S., because, as he says in a letter, he ‘has a just taste and value for such documents.’ On Mr. Gibson Craig’s death in 1886, it passed into the collection of his partner Sir Thomas Dawson Brodie, Bart. On his death, it came into my possession by purchase.

This is a beautifully written manuscript of sixty-two pages, small quarto, by Andrew Lumisden, who was the private secretary to Prince Charles in Scotland. Some documents included with the manuscript detail its history. It was originally written for John Home, the author of the tragedy Douglas, while he was working on his history of the Rebellion. After Home passed away, his nephew, John Home, W.S., gifted it to Macvey[Pg lxxxv] Napier, the Librarian of the Signet Library. In 1840, Napier presented it to Mr. James Gibson Craig, W.S., because, as he mentioned in a letter, he “has a just taste and value for such documents.” Following Mr. Gibson Craig's death in 1886, it went into the collection of his partner Sir Thomas Dawson Brodie, Bart. Upon his death, I acquired it by purchase.

Andrew Lumisden was a grandson of Andrew Lumisden, episcopal minister of Duddingston, who was ‘outed’ at the Revolution. In 1727 the latter was consecrated bishop of Edinburgh, and died six years later. The bishop’s third son, William, was educated for the bar, but he ‘went out’ in 1715, and, refusing to take the oaths to Government after that Rising, he was unable to follow his profession, but practised in Edinburgh as a Writer or law agent. He married Mary Bruce, a granddaughter of Robert Bruce, third of Kennet. To them were born two children, (1) Isabella born in 1719, who, in 1747, was married to the young artist Robert Strange, whom she had induced to join Prince Charles’s Life Guards, and who afterwards became the most famous British engraver of his time, and was knighted by George III.; and (2) Andrew, born in 1720, the author of this ‘Account.’

Andrew Lumisden was the grandson of Andrew Lumisden, the episcopal minister of Duddingston, who lost his position during the Revolution. In 1727, the latter was consecrated as the bishop of Edinburgh and passed away six years later. The bishop’s third son, William, was educated to become a lawyer, but he left that path in 1715. Refusing to pledge allegiance to the Government after that Rising, he could not continue in his profession and instead worked in Edinburgh as a Writer or law agent. He married Mary Bruce, who was a granddaughter of Robert Bruce, the third of Kennet. They had two children: (1) Isabella, born in 1719, who married the young artist Robert Strange in 1747. She encouraged him to join Prince Charles’s Life Guards, and he later became the most celebrated British engraver of his time, earning a knighthood from George III.; and (2) Andrew, born in 1720, the author of this ‘Account.’

Andrew followed his father’s profession of Writer, and when Prince Charles came to Edinburgh in 1745 he was, on the recommendation of his cousin Sir Alex. Dick of Prestonfield, appointed private secretary to the Prince, and accompanied him throughout the campaign. After Culloden he was attainted. He concealed himself for some weeks in Edinburgh, escaped to London, and thence to Rouen. Here at first he suffered great privation, but succeeded in obtaining a French pension of 600 livres, which relieved his immediate wants. In 1749 he went to Rome, and in the following year he was appointed Assistant Secretary to the Old Chevalier. On the death of James Edgar, in 1762, he succeeded him as Jacobite Secretary[Pg lxxxvi] of State. The Old Chevalier died in 1766, and Lumisden was for a time continued in his office by Charles. The great object of Charles’s policy was to be acknowledged by the Pope as King of Great Britain, a title which Clement XIII. refused him in spite of a powerful appeal by Cardinal Henry, Duke of York, to his Holiness.[105] Charles, smarting under the indignity, became intensely irritable, and gave himself up more and more to self-indulgence. In December 1768 Lumisden, along with two other Scottish officials, was summarily dismissed for refusing to accompany his royal master to an oratorio when that master was intoxicated.[106] Leaving Rome, he settled in Paris, where he moved in the highest literary and artistic circles. In 1773 he was allowed to return to Great Britain, and five years later he received a full pardon.

Andrew followed in his father's footsteps as a writer, and when Prince Charles came to Edinburgh in 1745, he was appointed private secretary to the Prince on the recommendation of his cousin Sir Alex. Dick of Prestonfield. He accompanied the Prince throughout the campaign. After Culloden, he was branded a traitor. He hid in Edinburgh for several weeks, escaped to London, and then made his way to Rouen. Initially, he faced significant hardships, but eventually secured a French pension of 600 livres, which eased his immediate struggles. In 1749, he traveled to Rome, and the following year, he became Assistant Secretary to the Old Chevalier. After James Edgar died in 1762, he took over as Jacobite Secretary of State. The Old Chevalier passed away in 1766, and Charles temporarily kept Lumisden in his position. Charles's main goal was to be recognized by the Pope as King of Great Britain, a title that Clement XIII refused, despite a strong appeal from Cardinal Henry, Duke of York, to him. Feeling humiliated, Charles became increasingly irritable and turned more to self-indulgence. In December 1768, Lumisden and two other Scottish officials were abruptly dismissed for refusing to accompany their intoxicated royal master to an oratorio. After leaving Rome, he settled in Paris, where he socialized in high literary and artistic circles. In 1773, he was allowed to return to Great Britain, and five years later, he received a full pardon.

Lumisden, who was never married, continued to spend much of his time in Paris, accounted ‘a man of the finest taste and learning,’ living the life of a dilettante, and paying frequent visits to London and Edinburgh.

Lumisden, who was never married, kept spending much of his time in Paris, regarded as ‘a man of the finest taste and learning,’ living the life of a dilettante, and making regular trips to London and Edinburgh.

There is a pleasant anecdote told of him at this time, which reflects the kindly feeling borne by King George III. to irreconcilable Jacobites. It is very similar to the well-known story of King George’s message to Laurence Oliphant of Gask, told by Sir Walter Scott in the Introduction to Redgauntlet. It must be remembered that to their dying day both the laird of Gask and Andrew Lumisden never referred to King George except as the Elector of Hanover. The story of Lumisden is told in a family paper[107] by his great-niece Mrs. Mure (née Louisa Strange), and may be given in that lady’s own words.

There’s a charming story about him from that time, which shows the goodwill King George III. had toward the unyielding Jacobites. It’s very much like the famous account of King George’s message to Laurence Oliphant of Gask, as told by Sir Walter Scott in the Introduction to Redgauntlet. It’s worth noting that right up until they passed away, both the laird of Gask and Andrew Lumisden only referred to King George as the Elector of Hanover. The story of Lumisden is shared in a family paper [107] by his great-niece Mrs. Mure (née Louisa Strange), and it can be relayed in her own words.

[Pg lxxxvii]

[Pg 87]

A valuable library was about to be dispersed in Paris, which contained a rare copy or edition of the Bible, and George III. commissioned his bookseller, Mr. Nichol, to procure it for him at a certain limit as to price. Mr. Nichol, intimate with Mr. Lumisden, whose literary character qualified him to pronounce as to the authenticity and value of this work, employed him to examine, and, on approval, to make this purchase, which he did, obtaining it at a far lower price than had been mentioned. The king, delighted with his acquisition, asked Mr. Nichol how he had managed to get it. Mr. Nichol replied he had ‘applied to a friend of his much connected with literature, whom he could trust,’ etc., etc. ‘Well, but who is your friend,’ said the king, ‘I suppose he has a name?’ ‘A gentleman named Lumisden, your Majesty,’ said Mr. Nichol. ‘Oh!’ replied the king, ‘the Prince’s secretary.’ The king, with true courtesy, never called Charles Edward aught but ‘the Prince.’ ‘Yes, your Majesty,’ said Mr. Nichol shyly, ‘the same.’ ‘Well, Nichol,’ said the king, ‘I am much obliged by the trouble Mr. Lumisden has taken; pray, make him my compliments, and tell him so; and I should like to send him some little token of this. What shall it be?’ Nichol suggested ‘a book, perhaps,’ and it is said the king laughed and said, ‘Oh, yes! a book, a book! that would suit you!’ However, the message was sent, and Mr. Lumisden’s reply was, that he should be gratified by the possession of a copy of Captain Cook’s Voyages, then just published, in which he took a deep interest, and considered they owed their success to the individual patronage given them by the king himself.

A valuable library was about to be broken up in Paris, which contained a rare edition of the Bible, and George III. asked his bookseller, Mr. Nichol, to buy it for him within a certain price limit. Mr. Nichol, who was close with Mr. Lumisden, a literary expert capable of verifying the authenticity and value of this work, had him examine it and, if approved, make the purchase. He did so, acquiring it at a much lower price than initially expected. The king, thrilled with his find, asked Mr. Nichol how he managed to get it. Mr. Nichol said he had "asked a friend of his who is well connected in literature and whom he could trust," etc. "But who is your friend?" the king inquired. "I suppose he has a name?" "A gentleman named Lumisden, your Majesty," Mr. Nichol replied. "Oh!" said the king, "the Prince’s secretary." The king, being genuinely courteous, always referred to Charles Edward simply as "the Prince." "Yes, your Majesty," Mr. Nichol said shyly, "the same." "Well, Nichol," the king said, "I really appreciate the effort Mr. Lumisden has made; please send him my compliments and tell him that. I would like to send him a small token of my appreciation. What should it be?" Nichol suggested "a book, perhaps," and it is said the king laughed and said, "Oh, yes! A book, a book! That would suit you!" However, the message was sent, and Mr. Lumisden's reply was that he would be pleased to receive a copy of Captain Cook’s Voyages, which had just been published and in which he had a keen interest, believing their success was due to the personal support given to them by the king himself.

A very handsome copy of Anson’s and Cook’s Voyages, in nine quarto volumes, was sent to Mr. Lumisden by the king. They were left by Mr. Lumisden to my father [Sir Thomas Strange], and he bequeathed them to his son James, now Admiral Strange, in whose possession they are. [Written in 1883.]

A very attractive copy of Anson’s and Cook’s Voyages, in nine quarto volumes, was sent to Mr. Lumisden by the king. Mr. Lumisden left them to my father [Sir Thomas Strange], who passed them on to his son James, now Admiral Strange, who currently owns them. [Written in 1883.]

In 1797 Lumisden published a volume at London entitled Remarks on the Antiquities of Rome and its Environs ... with Engravings, his only literary legacy excepting this account of the battles in Scotland. I have[Pg lxxxviii] failed to discover at what period of his life this manuscript was written.

In 1797, Lumisden published a book in London titled Remarks on the Antiquities of Rome and its Environs ... with Engravings, which is his only literary legacy aside from this account of the battles in Scotland. I have[Pg lxxxviii] not been able to find out when in his life this manuscript was written.

Lumisden died in Edinburgh in 1801. His usual lodging had been in the Luckenbooths, the very heart of the old town, but he had recently changed his quarters to the then new Princes Street, and to the very newest part of that street, the section west of Castle Street. To the imagination it seems strangely incongruous, yet as a link between the past and the present not entirely unfitting, that this aged partisan of the House of Stuart, probably the last Scottish gentleman who personally served that dynasty whose capital was the ancient city, should meet his death in the newest part of that modern street which is the glory of the Edinburgh that the Stuarts never knew.

Lumisden died in Edinburgh in 1801. He usually stayed in the Luckenbooths, right in the center of the old town, but he had recently moved to the then-new Princes Street, specifically the very latest section west of Castle Street. It seems oddly mismatched, yet as a connection between the past and the present, it’s not entirely out of place that this elderly supporter of the House of Stuart, likely the last Scottish gentleman to directly serve that dynasty whose capital was this ancient city, should pass away in the newest part of a modern street that embodies the Edinburgh the Stuarts never knew.


[Pg 3]

[Pg 3]

ORIGINS OF THE ’FORTY-FIVE
PAPERS OF JOHN MURRAY OF BROUGHTON

A COPY OF ORIGINAL PAPERS written by John Murray, Esq., Secretary to the Young Pretender, containing a History of the first Rise and Progress of the Late Rebellion from the End of the year 1742 to 1744.

A COPY OF ORIGINAL PAPERS written by John Murray, Esq., Secretary to the Young Pretender, containing a History of the first Rise and Progress of the Late Rebellion from the End of the year 1742 to 1744.

N.B.—The original is written by Mr. Murray’s own hand and was found after the Battle of Culloden, and seems to have been originally design’d as Memoirs, etc.

N.B.—The original was written by Mr. Murray himself and was discovered after the Battle of Culloden. It appears to have been originally intended as memoirs, etc.

Copy of a shattered Leaf belonging to the original Manuscript

Copy of a broken Leaf from the original Manuscript

Edgar to Murray

During all this winter[108] my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r,[109] as I observed before, was at London with Lord Semple[110] and Mr. Drummond,[111] and the gentlemen in the Highlands immediately concerned in his Majesties affairs were employed in cultivating his interest amongst their vassals and neighbours, which was the more easily done as the most part of that country are naturally Loyal and at the same time ... run so high against the Government, that any scheme proposed ... was most acceptable. It seems after his Lordship had been there sometime, he wrote a letter to his Majestie, in answer to which I received one enclosed to me from Mr. Edgar,[112] dated the 5th of July 1742, which was this.... It is a long time since I had the pleasure of writting to you which has been occasioned by my knowing you was informed of everything by[Pg 4] Bahady, and that being the case I did not care to ... venture all ... time when I shall ... to say to you as I ha ... view of recommending them ... for Lord [Tra]q[uai]r to your care ... of it with much satisfaction ... to assure you of my best respect and of the longing I have to tell you by word of mouth how much I am yours. As Lord T[ra]q[uai]r has been lately at London and knew there how things were going it is useless for me to enter here ... matters and as the King has particular directions to give you ... sent I shall add nothing ... but by his Majesties Com ... kind compliments ... that the family a ... I am with all my h....

During this winter, my Lord Traquair, as I mentioned earlier, was in London with Lord Semple and Mr. Drummond, and the gentlemen in the Highlands who were directly involved in the King's affairs were busy building support among their vassals and neighbors. This was made easier since most of that region was naturally loyal, and at the same time, sentiments against the Government ran so high that any plan proposed was very welcome. It seems that after my Lord had been there for a while, he wrote a letter to His Majesty, in response to which I received one addressed to me from Mr. Edgar, dated July 5, 1742, which was this... It has been a long time since I had the pleasure of writing to you, which was due to knowing you were informed of everything by Bahady, and since that was the case, I didn't want to take the risk of repeating everything when I could eventually say to you that I... have a view of recommending them for Lord Traquair to your care... with much satisfaction... to assure you of my best respect and of the desire I have to tell you in person how much I am yours. As Lord Traquair has recently been in London and knew how things were going, there's no need for me to discuss matters here, and since the King has specific instructions to give you, I will add nothing more... but His Majesty's kind compliments... to the family, I am with all my...

After his Lordships return ... taken to inform the Highlands of the favourable situation there seemed to ... from the information he had got from Lord Semple and Drummond ...

After his Lordship's return ... taken to inform the Highlands of the favorable situation there seemed to ... from the information he had got from Lord Semple and Drummond ...

The rest of this page torn away.

The rest of this page is missing.

Copy of another shattered Leaf

Copy of another broken Leaf

Which message tho’ they began to languish a little, yet kept up their spirits. As nothing is more common than for people to believe what they wish and hope for, however specious the encouragement may be. Upon Mr. Drummond parting with His Lordship at London, he assured him he would write particularly whatever Resolutions the Cardinal[113] should come to after his arrival, imagining, as he said, that the promises they had gott in England from the King’s friends there would suffice to determine the old man to act strenuously in his Majesty’s favours; upon which we waited impatiently to hear from him. In the beginning of Winter Locheal came to town with whom I had occasion often to converse on these subjects, and always found him the man the most ready, and willing chearfully to enter into any scheme that would conduce to His Majesty’s interest: and must here declare[Pg 5] that I really believe he is the most sincere honest man the Country produces, without the least shew of self interest. After several months had passed without my hearing from Rome, or any letters coming from My L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r received one from Mr. Drummond about the beginning of December and dated ... of ... which alarmed us very much, as it gave us ground to believe that things were much nearer Action, than we had any notion of, and indeed it seemed to us only fitt to be written a few weeks before a descent; but to make the reader Judge, I shall here insert a letter itself.

Which message, although they began to lose a bit of their energy, still kept their spirits up. It's common for people to believe what they want and hope for, no matter how flimsy the encouragement may seem. When Mr. Drummond parted ways with His Lordship in London, he assured him he would write specifically about any decisions the Cardinal[113] would make after his arrival, thinking, as he said, that the promises they had received in England from the King’s friends there would be enough to motivate the old man to act vigorously in his Majesty’s favor; after that, we waited eagerly to hear from him. At the beginning of winter, Locheal came to town, with whom I often had discussions on these matters, and I always found him ready and eager to engage in any plans that would benefit His Majesty’s interests: I must say[Pg 5] that I truly believe he is the most genuine, honest man the country has, without the slightest hint of self-interest. After several months had passed without any news from Rome, or any letters from My L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r, I received one from Mr. Drummond at the beginning of December, dated ... of ..., which alarmed us greatly, as it suggested that things were much closer to action than we had thought, and indeed it seemed to us to be written just a few weeks before a descent; but to allow the reader to judge, I will insert the letter itself here.

Copy Mr. Drummond’s letter to the Earl of T[ra]q[uai]r dated the     1742.

Copy Mr. Drummond’s letter to the Earl of T[ra]q[uai]r dated the 1742.

The rest awanting.

The rest is missing.

Copy of another torn Leaf in Manuscripts

Copy of another torn page in manuscripts

As there was nothing in this letter but a general assurance of the French Design without either specyfying the number of the Troops, Arms, Money, Ammunition or even the fixed time, My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and the Laird of Lochiel[114] considering how unprepared the Country was to join in any such attack attempt, and that from the contents of the letter it was impossible to give any positive directions to the Gentlemen of the Highlands, together with the near prospect they had of a landing, which must of necessity have proved abortive had it really happened. They thought it absolutely necessary they should be presently informed of everything, but the difficulty was how to accomplish it. There was no opportunity to write, the time of an answer uncertain, and from the indistinct letter already received they had no great reason to expect anything in writing very satisfactory ... upon which I offered to go ... and then learn distinctly ... the Resolutions of the ... fully informed ... but as this was not to ... having the opinion of ... who[Pg 6] were the most ... in his Majesties Interest ... a letter wrote by ... which went to him by ... likewise one to S[ir] J[ames] C[ampbell][115] their advice and opinion, and during the intervall we had severall conversations all tending to acquaint us particularly of what had been carried on for sometime before by Lord Semple, Mr. Drummond and then received by me as one of these who had been the first in the Country to form a Concert, binding themselves by oath not to discover their schemes to any but one of themselves, or the persons agreed upon to be received amongst them by the Consent of the whole.

As there was nothing in this letter but a general assurance of the French plan without specifying the number of troops, weapons, money, ammunition, or even a set date, Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and the Laird of Lochiel[114] realized how unprepared the country was to join in any kind of attack. The vague letter made it impossible to give any clear directions to the gentlemen of the Highlands, and because they were expecting a landing that would have inevitably failed if it had actually happened, they thought it was crucial to be informed of everything immediately. However, the challenge was figuring out how to make that happen. There were no chances to write, the timing of a response was uncertain, and the unclear letter they had received gave them little reason to expect anything satisfactory in writing. So, I offered to go and find out the exact plans of the... fully informed... but since this was not to... having the opinion of... who[Pg 6] were most... in His Majesty’s interest... a letter was written by... that went to him by... and also one to S[ir] J[ames] C[ampbell][115] for their advice and opinion. During the interval, we had several discussions all aimed at finding out what had been going on for some time before, led by Lord Semple and Mr. Drummond, of which I had been one of the first in the country to form a group, committing themselves by oath not to reveal their plans to anyone except for one of their own or the individuals accepted among them with the consent of all.

I had for a long time before been pretty well acquainted with who were the principle people concerned in all the present transactions, without knowing there had ever been any such formal Combination. I gave my word of honour faithfully to keep these secrets, and then they told me the rise of the Story what assurances they had given the French by the hands of Drummond and Lord Semple after making terms with the King himself, that nobody should be acquented with their procedure without their consent. I was like wise informed

I had known for quite a while who the key people involved in all the current dealings were, without realizing there had ever been a formal grouping. I gave my word of honor to keep these secrets, and then they explained the background of the situation and what guarantees they had given to the French through Drummond and Lord Semple after negotiating terms with the King himself, that no one should be informed of their actions without their permission. I was also informed

The rest of this Page not legible.

The rest of this page is not readable.

The weather at this time happening to be very stormy, the express did not return for two weeks longer than we expected; but upon receiving his Lordships answer which he approved of the proposal, I sett about making ready to sett off, and accordingly took journey about the 10 or 12 of Jany. 1743, upon the pretence of talking with the Duke of Queensberry[116] then at London concerning a process I had with the Earl of March,[117] to whom his Grace had been Tutor-in-law.

The weather at this time was really stormy, so the express didn't come back for two weeks longer than we expected. But after receiving his Lordship's answer, which he approved of the proposal, I got ready to leave and set off around January 10 or 12, 1743, under the pretense of discussing a case I had with the Duke of Queensberry in London, who had been the Earl of March's tutor-in-law.

On the Friday I left Edinburgh and went to Traquair[Pg 7] and so through Tweeddale to York, where I stop’d to talk to the D[uke] of P[erth] one of the Concert, and acquaint him with my journey and received his commands. The principal part of my transactions was to make myself fully acquainted with the French Resolutions, to give them all encouragement possible, and to write to his Majesty acquainting him that the Gentleman in the Highlands being informed that my L[ord] M[arischal],[118] whom his Majesty had honoured with the Command, was a man of a very high and forbidding manner, and exceedingly positive in his way, they were afraid least such procedure might create differences and heart burnings amongst them; wherefore he prayed his Majesty would send over General Keith,[119] who they understood was of a very mild and humane temper and in whose abilitys they had great confidence. When I came to York his Grace the D[uke] of P[erth] approved highly of my going over and gave me a great many injunctions[120] how to write to the King, which is needless here to put down as they all tended to prevent differences in case matters came to be put in execution. I then went to London, where I only stayed some few days, and sett out of on[Pg 8] Munday about 12 o’clock to Dover where I arrived the same night about 9 o’clock, and found a Packet ready to sail. As the wind was then pretty fair, I was in hopes of getting next morning pretty early to Calais, but it changed a little after we was at sea, so were oblidged to make for Boulogne, this made me exceedingly uneasy as I was instructed to go privately to Paris without the knowledge of any of the people who were at Boulogne, and now in all probability we were to land in broad daylight where I must infallibly have been known; but luckily we were becalmed all that day, and did not arrive till about three in the morning. I stayed there till about five, when I got a chaise and set out for Paris, where I came on Friday morning and went to McDonald’s the Banquier,[121] and enquired for Mr. Maxwell, which was the name Drummond then went by. I immediately went to him this same day before dinner, and found him greatly surprised at my Coming, but said it was very lucky as it might be a mean to quicken the French in proceeding; when they saw how forward and anxious the Country was to come to action. Upon my arrival at London I heard of Cardinal Fleury’s death, which was a very unlucky incident; for these two Gentlemen had it left in their power to assert, that had not that happened, every thing would certainly have been performed, and not then in my power to advance anything positively to the contrary. I went with Mr. Drummond in the evening to Lord Semple who I had never seen before: he received me very civily and enquired about the situation of the Country which I told him was very favourable; but as the letter Mr. Drummond had wrote, gave us to understand that the Cardinal had determined to put things in execution sooner than we had any cause to expect, never having had anything encouraging before, and that by that letter, we was told of no particulars, it was judged necessary I should[Pg 9] come over to know how things were to be executed: and particularly, what assurances of every kind we might depend upon; so as the Gentlemen of the concert might be able upon my return to sett immediately about preparing the Country for their reception. He then agreed with Mr. Drummond that my coming over was well timed, but that he was afraid it might require some time before the French could be brought into it, as in all probability their schemes would be entirely altered by the Cardinal’s death; that all his views consisted in keeping peace, but that there was a party of younger people about court, who had gained a good deal upon the King, which together with his own natural disposition and heat of youth inclined him to war. At the same time he said it was lucky that he had observed the Cardinal’s Decline, and had persuaded him to impart all the affairs that concerned this Country to Mr. Amalot,[122] by which means they would be but little stop as to the King or Ministery being acquainted with whatever related to us, as Mr. Amalot was continued as Minister of Forreign Affairs. A great deal more of this kind passed, and upon my not being able to tell them minutly what every individual of the Concert had done in the particular District alotted them, Mr. Drummond complained that I had not been fully informed of all their Scheme. I in the meanwhile did not reflect upon the Cause of his making such reflections against Lord T[ra]q[uai]r, who was the person that informed me of their Concert; but it has often occurred to me since, that they laid great stress on all the little pieces of information they gott of the Gentlemen’s procedure in Scotland, and everything they gott took care to make a mighty matter of it to the King: and Mr. Drummond did not fail as he has often told me himself, to write in the strongest terms to his Majesty, of their great success, which he knew must always redound so far to his advantage, as he had taken care to make the King believe he was the person who had sett all in motion, and that it was upon his plan that they acted, and their success[Pg 10] mostly owing to following the Scheme he had laid down to them. I then told them it would be necessary as the Cardinal was now dead that I saw Mr. Amalot, and heard what Resolutions they had taken, to be able to inform the King’s friends of what was to be expected. Lord Semple told me that Mr. Amalot was then at Versailes, but would be in town on Sunday when he would talk to him, and inform him of my being sent over, and gett him to fix a time when I might have an audience, he accordingly was with him on the Sunday and, as he told me the same evening, could not see him for ... and when he did tell him, he took it very ill that he had been made wait so long in his Out-chamber; that although his Master was not upon the Throne and so did not keep his Ministers publickly at Court, yet he thought using these he employed in his service in that shape was treating him ill and not like a Prince as he really was. That Mr. Amalot made excuses from his being so little in Paris all week, and consequently hurryed all the while he was there; but fixed no time when to see me, so his Lordship went by himself to Versailes that week, where he stayed a night or two and returned to town. I went out some days after along with him and Mr. Drumond to see Mr. Amalot who was first to talk to with the King and then return me his Majesty’s answer, but was told from day to day, that he could not have an opportunity of talking with the King. So was oblidged to return to Paris without seeing him.

On the Friday, I left Edinburgh and headed to Traquair[Pg 7], then through Tweeddale to York, where I stopped to speak with the Duke of Perth, one of the Concert members, to update him on my journey and received his instructions. My main task was to get fully informed about the French Resolutions, give them as much encouragement as possible, and write to the King to let him know that the gentlemen in the Highlands were informed that my Lord Marischal, whom the King had honored with the Command, had a very stern and authoritative demeanor, which worried them that it could cause conflicts among them. Therefore, he requested the King to send over General Keith, who they believed to be a very kind and approachable person and someone they had great trust in. Upon arriving in York, the Duke of Perth strongly endorsed my trip and gave me many guidelines on how to communicate with the King, which I won’t detail here since they all aimed to prevent any disagreements in case things progressed. I then went to London, where I stayed just a few days, setting off on Monday around noon for Dover, arriving that same night around 9 p.m., and found a Packet ready to leave. With the wind looking favorable, I hoped to reach Calais early the next morning, but it changed a bit after we set sail, so we had to head for Boulogne, which made me quite anxious as I was instructed to go discreetly to Paris without anyone at Boulogne knowing, and now we were likely to land in the clear daylight where I would definitely be recognized. Fortunately, we were stuck in calm waters all day and didn’t arrive until about three in the morning. I stayed there until around five, then grabbed a carriage and headed for Paris, arriving Friday morning and going to McDonald’s the Banker[Pg 8] to ask for Mr. Maxwell, which was the name Drummond was using at the time. I went to see him that same day before lunch, and he was quite surprised by my visit, but said it was fortunate as it could encourage the French to take action when they saw how eager the Country was. When I got to London, I heard about Cardinal Fleury’s death, which was a very unfortunate event because those two gentlemen had the means to assert that had that not happened, everything would definitely have been put into action, leaving me unable to advance anything contrary. I went with Mr. Drummond in the evening to Lord Semple, whom I had never met before. He welcomed me very politely and asked about the state of the Country, which I told him was quite favorable; however, the letter Mr. Drummond had written indicated that the Cardinal had decided to move things along sooner than we had anticipated, having never received any previous encouragement, and without specific details in that letter, it was deemed necessary for me to come over to understand how things were to be carried out, especially what assurances we could rely upon so that the gentlemen of the concert could start preparing the Country for their arrival upon my return. He then agreed with Mr. Drummond that my coming over was well-timed, but he feared it might take some time before the French could get on board, as their plans would likely be completely changed due to the Cardinal’s death. All his intentions had been to maintain peace, but a group of younger individuals at court had gained considerable influence over the King, who, combined with his own natural temperament and youthful enthusiasm, was leaning towards war. At the same time, he mentioned it was fortunate that he had noted the Cardinal's decline and encouraged him to delegate all matters concerning our Country to Mr. Amalot[Pg 9], which meant there would be minimal delay in the King or Ministry being updated about us, as Mr. Amalot remained the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Much more was discussed, and since I couldn't detail what every single individual of the Concert had done in their respective assigned regions, Mr. Drummond complained that I hadn’t been fully informed of their scheme. Meanwhile, I hadn’t considered why he commented against Lord Traquair, who was the person that had informed me of their Concert; however, it has often occurred to me since then that they placed great importance on the small bits of information they got about the gentlemen’s actions in Scotland, and everything they received was treated as significant to the King. Mr. Drummond didn’t hesitate to write to his Majesty in the strongest terms about their great success, knowing it would benefit him greatly, as he made sure to lead the King to believe he was the one who had set everything in motion and that they were acting according to his plan, attributing their success[Pg 10] mainly to following the strategy he had laid out for them. I then told them it was essential, now that the Cardinal was dead, for me to see Mr. Amalot and learn about the resolutions they had taken so I could inform the King’s supporters of what to expect. Lord Semple told me Mr. Amalot was at Versailles but would be in town on Sunday, when he would speak with him and inform him of my being sent over and arrange a time for me to have an audience. He met with him on Sunday, but as he told me that evening, he could not see him immediately. When he finally did convey my message, Mr. Amalot took it poorly that I had to wait so long in his outer chamber; he felt that though his Master was not on the Throne and didn’t keep his Ministers at court publicly, treating those in his service like that was ill-mannered and not in keeping with how a Prince should act. Mr. Amalot made excuses for being out of Paris all week and rushed during the time he was there, but he did not set a time for me to meet him. So, Lord Semple went on his own to Versailles that week, where he stayed a night or two before returning to town. A few days later, I joined him and Mr. Drummond to see Mr. Amalot, who was supposed to speak to the King first and then relay the King’s response to me, but day after day I was told he couldn't get the chance to talk to the King. Thus, I had to return to Paris without seeing him.

I wrote a pretty long letter to the King acquainting him with the reasons of my coming over and hoping his Majesty would pardon my leaving the Country without his Permission, but not to be too tedious by mentioning all the different conversations I had with his Lordship and Mr. Drummond during my stay which were all to the same purpose, together with the most severe Reflections and Invectives against the Dutches of Buckingham[123][Pg 11] and Lord Marshal with Coll Cecel,[124] Coll Brette[125] and Ch. Smith[126] and all those who were of a contrary party from them, alledging it was entirely owing to their having given in Ridiculous Schemes to the Cardinal demanding vast numbers of men, money, cannon, etc., sufficient to conquer the Country, which made the Old man have a mean opinion of the power of the King’s party and put a stop to his realy putting in execution ... required of him; and at the same time assuring me that these people were most unjust to the Cardinal in alledging that he was not hearty and sincere in the King’s interest, for that he had often professed that he would willingly lose his own life in the cause, that there was nothing he had so much at heart next to the Interest of his own Master, and that he had even cryed[127] with concern in speaking of the misfortunes of the King’s family, and notwithstanding he had a very mean opinion of the other party, yet the Memorials they had given instruct him so much that it cost Lord Semple the utmost[128] pains and trouble to perswade him of the contrary, but[Pg 12] they had after some time succeeded so effectually that he was determined to send over a body of troops to England and designed Mr. Mailebois[129] should return to Flanders for that purpose; but that the party at Court which opposed him had influenced the King to make him march his Army into Westphalia which occasioned the Neutrality for Hannover; that this was so opposite to his Schemes, and he was sensible that a general war must ensue, and France thereby brought into great difficulties, that together with the King’s loose way of living, having at that time taken the third sister for his mistress, had certainly broke his heart, for he had been observed from that moment to decline, and dyed soon after.[130]

I wrote a pretty long letter to the King explaining why I came over and hoping his Majesty would forgive me for leaving the country without permission. I won’t go into too much detail about all the conversations I had with his Lordship and Mr. Drummond during my stay, which were all about the same thing. I also shared some harsh criticisms and attacks against the Duchess of Buckingham, Lord Marshal, Colonel Cecel, Colonel Brette, and Ch. Smith, and all those who were on the opposite side. They claimed it was entirely due to their ridiculous plans given to the Cardinal, asking for huge numbers of men, money, cannons, etc., enough to conquer the country, which led the old man to have a low opinion of the King’s party and stopped him from actually taking action as required. At the same time, I was assured that these people were being very unfair to the Cardinal by claiming he wasn’t truly committed to the King’s interests, since he had often stated that he would gladly sacrifice his own life for the cause. Nothing meant more to him than the interests of his own master, and he even cried out of concern when discussing the misfortunes of the King’s family. Despite having a very low opinion of the other party, the memorials they provided influenced him so much that it took Lord Semple a lot of effort to persuade him otherwise. Eventually, they succeeded to the point where he decided to send troops to England and planned for Mr. Mailebois to go back to Flanders for that purpose. However, the faction at court that opposed him managed to sway the King to send his army into Westphalia, which led to the neutrality for Hannover. He realized this was completely against his plans and understood that a general war would follow, bringing France into serious difficulties. Additionally, the King’s reckless lifestyle—having taken the third sister as his mistress at that time—had surely broken his heart, as he was observed to decline after that and died soon after.

Having spent some days at Paris in hearing such like storys, I went again to Versailes where we were still put off till the night I left it. When we had an audience of Mr. Amalot I told him that the Gentlemen in the Concert in Scotland,[131] having from time to time received assurances from the late Cardinal of Troops, Arms and Money, had been continualy expecting to hear that a final Resolution was taken but upon being informed of the bad state of health the Cardinal was in,[132][Pg 13] they had done me the honour to send me over instructed to represent the situation of their affairs to the Ministry and to acquaint them they had wrought so effectualy with the Country in general and their Vassals in particular that they could raise near thirty thousand men and were able to make themselves masters of the Country in six weeks or two months. Upon which he interrupted me and said that they were satisfied the Scots were able to do a great deal but that they must have assurances from England, but at the same time he said he did not well understand the possibility of engaging so many people without letting them into the secret. Upon which Lord Semple explained the matter to him, I then mentioned to him the number of men, arms, etc., we expected in Scotland together with the place of their landing and method proposed for their acting he said if things were gone into there would be no difficulty of arms, money, etc., but seemed to be ignorant as to the place of landing or indeed the particulars of the scheme and which confirmed me in this; some things that L[ord] Semple mentioned to him he knew nothing about and he owned he had not read the memorials but promised to do it and gave us to understand that nothing could be undertaken without encouragement from the English and assurances of the troops upon their landing having provisions of victuals and carriages which we took pains to show him that from the frequency of the touns upon the coast and the trade there continually carried on they could not fail of, and then told me he had not gott time to talk seriously and fully with the King, but that his Majesty desired him to assure me he had the King my master’s interest very much at heart and so soon as he could do it safely and with his Honour, he would; and told us to believe it that he could easily loss 10,000 men, but that he would not undertake it rashly as his being foiled in a thing of this kind would not be consistant with the Honour of his Crown and desired we might think very seriously of what we was about and take care not to bring ruin upon ourselves and the Country by a[Pg 14] rash attempt,[133] and so we parted and so we came that same night to Paris.

Having spent a few days in Paris hearing stories like this, I went back to Versailles, where we were still postponed until the night I left. When we had a meeting with Mr. Amalot, I told him that the gentlemen at the concert in Scotland, having received assurances from the late Cardinal about troops, arms, and money from time to time, had been continually expecting to hear that a final decision was made. But upon learning about the Cardinal's poor health, they honored me by sending me over with instructions to represent their situation to the Ministry and inform them that they had effectively engaged the country in general and their vassals in particular to raise nearly thirty thousand men and make themselves masters of the country in six weeks or two months. He interrupted me and said they were confident the Scots could do a lot but that they needed assurances from England. At the same time, he expressed that he didn’t grasp how it was possible to mobilize so many people without involving them in the secret. Lord Semple then explained the situation to him. I mentioned the number of men, arms, etc., we expected in Scotland, along with the proposed landing site and method for their action. He said if things progressed, there would be no issues with arms, money, etc., but he seemed unaware of the landing location or the specifics of the plan, which confirmed my suspicions. Some points that Lord Semple mentioned were new to him, and he admitted he hadn’t read the memorials but promised to do so. He made it clear that nothing could be undertaken without encouragement from the English and assurances that the troops would have provisions and transport upon landing. We made efforts to show him that, given the frequency of towns along the coast and the ongoing trade there, this wouldn’t be a problem. He then told me he hadn’t had time to speak seriously and thoroughly with the King but that His Majesty wanted me to know he had my master’s interests at heart. He assured me that as soon as he could do it safely and honorably, he would. He urged us to understand that he could easily lose 10,000 men but wouldn’t act recklessly, as being foiled in such a matter wouldn't be consistent with the honor of his crown. He asked us to consider carefully what we were about and take care not to bring ruin upon ourselves and the country with a rash attempt. Then we parted, and that same night we returned to Paris.

Next day I again wrote to the King a few lines wherein I told him I thought Mr. Amalot had done as much as he could at the present juncture and that I thought the information I had gott was well worth my while of coming over and sure enough it merited the journey, for by this I had it in my power to assure our friends in Scotland there was no determinate Resolution taken; and at the same time the manner in which Mr. Drummond told me he had taken to engage the Highland Gentlemen seemed to me very good and practicable. As I was then but little acquainted with business imagined it might have the same effect upon these in the Low Country and indeed was so much prevented with the good character of L[ord] Semple and Mr. Drummond had amongst those concerned in his Majesty’s affairs in Scotland that it never came into my head to doubt of anything they advanced; in which opinion I partly remained till my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s return to Scotland in Octr. 1743 that same year.[134]

The next day, I wrote to the King again, sharing my thoughts that Mr. Amalot had done all he could at that moment. I mentioned that the information I had gathered was definitely worth my trip, and it really justified the journey. With that information, I was able to assure our friends in Scotland that no final decision had been made. Also, the way Mr. Drummond described his approach to engage the Highland gentlemen seemed very solid and doable to me. Since I wasn't very experienced in business at the time, I thought it might have the same effect on those in the Low Country. I was really impressed by the good reputation that Lord Semple and Mr. Drummond had among those involved in the King’s affairs in Scotland, so I didn't doubt anything they said. I held onto that belief until my Lord Traquair returned to Scotland in October 1743 that same year.[134]

[Pg 15]

[Pg 15]

From what Mr. Amelot had told us the next thing to be done was endeavouring to form a Concert in England, by which they might be able to give such encouragement to the French and such assurance of joining upon their landing together with victuals and carriages as might then oblidge the King to declare one way or other. To execute this Mr. Drummond and I sett out from Paris the end of Febuary and gott to London by the way of Dover in four days and a half. The method he proposed was to bring my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r to London and to work the point by him as he was acquainted with all the principal Torries and desired I would go to York and gett the D[uke] of P[erth] to send express for him and that I would return with a Resolution to stay there for some time to be an assistant to his L[ordship] and him; but this I refused to go into as the reason I had given out for my journey would not suffice to detain me any time, so rather chuse to go to Scotland myself and shew my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r the necessity there was for his coming up. In the meanwhile I was employed in endeavouring to learn from Coll. Cicel and Mr. Smith[Pg 16] the objections the Dutches of Buckingham and her party had to L[ord] Semple, and as I was pretty well acquainted with them both I easily made myself master of all they had to say against him, which I then thought quite frivolous from the favourable notion I had of L[ord] Semple. As to the particular accusations laid against him I shall say nothing of them here as I shall put down the Copy of a letter I had the Honour to write to the King some litle time after my arrival in Scotland wherein I mentioned them all.

From what Mr. Amelot told us, the next step was to try to form a coalition in England that could provide support to the French and assurance of joining them upon their landing, along with supplies and transport, which might compel the King to take a definitive stance. To accomplish this, Mr. Drummond and I left Paris at the end of February and traveled to London via Dover in four and a half days. His plan was to bring my Lord Traquair to London and leverage his connections with the key Tories; he asked me to go to York and get the Duke of Perth to send an urgent message for him, and suggested that I stay there for a while to assist his Lordship and him. However, I declined this, as the reason I had given for my journey wouldn't justify a long stay. Instead, I preferred to go to Scotland myself and demonstrate to Lord Traquair the importance of his involvement. In the meantime, I was working to learn from Colonel Cicel and Mr. Smith the objections that the Duchess of Buckingham and her faction had against Lord Semple. Since I was fairly well-acquainted with both of them, I quickly grasped all their arguments against him, which I found completely petty given my positive view of Lord Semple. Regarding the specific accusations made against him, I won’t discuss them here, as I will include a copy of a letter I had the honor of writing to the King shortly after my arrival in Scotland, where I mentioned all of them.

I sett out from London[135] the 18th of March, came in by York, where I saw the D[uke] of P[erth] who was much disappointed upon what I told him, stayed 24 hours there and came to Edinburgh the 21st. I immediately inquired for L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r and finding he was in Perthshire with his brother-in-law L[ord] J[ohn] D[rummon]d I sent an Express to him, in the meantime I mett with L[ochie]l and acquainted him of all that had passed and particularly of the Scheme he proposed to raise money whereby to pay his father-in-law’s pension; he was far from being pleased with the French delays and not satisfied with the Cardinal’s sincerity and likewise heartyly vexed there was no money for Sir J[ames] who then stood in great need of it. However the only thing to be done was for L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r to go to London and endeavour to bring in the English which[Pg 17] would in a little time satisfie us whether the French really intended us their assistance or not. On the 16th of the month L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r came to toun, to whom I told all that had passed and his Lordship agreed to go to London. Upon conversing with his Lordship[136] I told him that he ought to push Mr. Drummond’s getting that money, for if he did not make his word good in that trifle it would be a means to make folk doubt all the other things he had advanced. His Lordship sett out from his own house on the Sixth of Aprile and I sent the bond Mr. Drummond desired signed by L[ochie]l and I to the D[uke] of Perth who signed it likewise and sent it to L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r[137] at London, which is still in Mr. D[rummon]d’s Custody, but no money raised during my being at London after my return from Paris, Mr. C. Smith delivered me a packet from Rome, but as its contents[Pg 18] could not be obeyed till I came home, thought it more proper to insert it here tho’ posterior to the Receit of it.

I set out from London on March 18th, passed through York, where I met the Duke of Perth, who was quite disappointed by what I told him. I stayed there for 24 hours and arrived in Edinburgh on the 21st. I immediately asked about Lord Traquair and found out he was in Perthshire with his brother-in-law, Lord John Drummond. I sent an express to him. In the meantime, I met Lochiel and informed him of everything that had happened, especially about the plan to raise funds to pay his father-in-law's pension. He was not happy with the French delays and was also frustrated with the Cardinal's honesty. Additionally, he was really annoyed that there was no money for Sir James, who needed it badly. The only thing to do was for Lord Traquair to go to London and try to bring in the English, which would soon show us whether the French truly intended to help us or not. On the 16th of the month, Lord Traquair came to town. I told him everything that had occurred, and he agreed to go to London. While talking with him, I suggested he should push Mr. Drummond to secure that money because if he didn't fulfill his promise on that small matter, it would make people doubt all the other things he had proposed. Lord Traquair left his house on April 6th, and I sent the bond that Mr. Drummond requested, signed by Lochiel and me, to the Duke of Perth, who also signed it and sent it to Lord Traquair in London. It's still in Mr. Drummond's possession, but no money was raised while I was in London after returning from Paris. Mr. C. Smith gave me a packet from Rome, but since its contents couldn’t be addressed until I returned home, I thought it better to include it here even though it's dated after receiving it.

Copy of a letter from Mr. Edgar of ... mber the 22nd, 1742.

Copy of a letter from Mr. Edgar of ... mber the 22nd, 1742.

Edgar to Murray

Sir,—Upon what Mr. Charles Smith has told me from you on the subject of the Bishops[138] upon what he says himself and as the opinion also of other friends the King has thought seriously on the matter and is pleased to settle it as you proposed, as you will see by the enclosed paper signed by him under another name and a letter from me to Bishop Ratrae;[139] yours covering it both are write in closs Cypher, but as I am unwilling that the Cyphers we use together should be put into any third hand whatsoever, I have wrote the enclosed packet by the Cypher Coll. Urquhart[140] informed me he had recovered from amongst the late Earl of Dundonald[141] papers before his death. I really look upon this Cypher to be a safe one and that there is no Copy of it but what you and I have, it was originally sent to Mr. Robert Freebairn[142] and he gave to the Earl of Dundonald and I am perswaded neither the one nor t’other made a Copy of it which would not be an easie task nor allowed any to be made by any other body, I remmember Coll. Urquhart after he had recovered that Cypher asked me if he should send it to me, or what he should do with it, and in return I desired him to keep it by him and give to the King’s friends who had a mind to write to his Majesty and wanted a Cypher to do it by, by which means the new one I sent him (now used by you and me) would be a Virgin One unseen and untouched by anybody, I thought it was[Pg 19] necessary to say thus much to you on the Cypher in Question. The Packet I now send you is open, therefore may if you please look into it yourself, but as I reckon you wont care to be at the trouble to decypher it I wish you would seal the packet and deliver it with ... of the Cypher into Mr. Rattrae’s own hands. I shall only add on this subject that I know I need not recommend to you to take care of your own safety in this matter and that as few as possible and these only of whom you are sure know anything that we have the least dealing in it, for tho’ our Clergy be well meaning honest men, yett many of them have not the gift of Secrecy and holding their tongue, which is a mischief I am sure you will guard against. I don’t know indeed what to say to you on certain affairs, I live in good hopes they will still go well, when anything favourable is certain you will hear of it much sooner from Bahady and L[ord] Semple than you could from me; which is the reason I write so seldome to you, I am unwilling to venture a letter in this critical juncture unless when necessary as it happens in the present case. I should be glad you informed me of what you heard or know of Drumelzier’s[143] brother he has not write to me since he mett with his brother and I have heard nothing about him since he went home. Drumelzier, I fancy, may have told him the substance of what you communicated to him of my letter to you concerning him, which he may have taken very ill of me and which has made him write no more to anybody in this place. The family is well and the King charges me with many kind compliments to you. Longing to have you in my Arms. I am well all with my heart.—Sir, etc.

Mister,—Regarding what Mr. Charles Smith has relayed from you about the Bishops[138], based on his statements and the opinions of other friends, the King has given this matter serious thought and is pleased to settle it as you suggested. You will see this in the enclosed paper signed by him under a different name, along with a letter from me to Bishop Ratrae;[139] both yours and mine are written in close cipher. However, since I prefer that the ciphers we use together aren’t shared with anyone else, I have written the enclosed packet using the cipher Colonel Urquhart[140] informed me he had retrieved from the late Earl of Dundonald's[141] papers before his passing. I truly believe this cipher is secure and that there are no copies of it aside from what you and I have. It was originally sent to Mr. Robert Freebairn[142], who passed it to the Earl of Dundonald, and I’m convinced neither of them made a copy, which would have been a challenging task and not permitted to any outsiders. I remember Colonel Urquhart asked me what to do with the recovered cipher, and I requested him to keep it safe and give it to the King’s friends who wanted to write to His Majesty and needed a cipher. This way, the new one I sent him (now used by you and me) would remain completely untouched and unseen by anyone else. I thought it necessary to clarify this about the cipher in question. The packet I’m sending you is open, so you can look through it if you want, but since I doubt you’d want to go through the trouble of deciphering it, I would appreciate it if you could seal the packet and deliver it directly to Mr. Rattrae. I should also mention that I trust you to prioritize your safety in this situation and to only involve as few people as possible—only those you are sure are discreet. Although our clergy are well-meaning and honest, many of them lack the ability to keep a secret, and I know you will guard against that. I truly don’t know what more to say about certain matters; I remain hopeful that things will continue to go well. When any positive news is confirmed, you’ll hear about it much sooner from Bahady and Lord Semple than from me, which is why I write to you so infrequently. I’m hesitant to risk sending a letter during these critical times unless absolutely necessary, as in this situation. I would appreciate it if you could update me on anything you hear or know about Drumelzier’s[143] brother. He hasn't written to me since meeting his brother and I haven’t heard anything about him since he returned home. I suspect Drumelzier may have shared what you told him about my letter to you regarding him, which he might have taken poorly, leading him to stop writing to anyone here. The family is doing well, and the King sends you many kind compliments. I long to hold you in my arms. I’m doing well, all things considered.—Sir, etc.

It was not long after his Lordship’s departure that I[Pg 20] had an occasion to send a letter to Rome when I wrote as below.[144]

It wasn't long after his Lordship left that I[Pg 20] had a chance to send a letter to Rome, so I wrote as follows.[144]

Mr. Narsom’s letter to Mr. Edgar dated the     Day of     1743.[145]

Mr. Narsom’s letter to Mr. Edgar dated the Day of 1743.[145]

Murray to Edgar

This is the first opportunity I had to write since I left Paris otherwise you may beleive I would not have failed to lett you hear from me long e’er now. I received yours of the 22nd of Novr. from Mr. Smith at London but as Mr. Rattrae has not been in town not finding any sure hand the two enclosed papers are still in my Custody, but I am informed he intends soon in this place, when I shall take care to deliver them with the Cypher; I am very hopefull his Majesty’s making choise of him will prove a means of uniting them together as they have for some time ago addressed him as the eldest of the Colledge to take inspection of the Diocess during the Vacancy; I return you my most sincere acknowledgements for your good advice as to my Behaviour with them which you may depend upon I’ll strickly follow and by what I wrote you of Mr. Keith’s[146] procedure you will be still more convinced of the Necessity I am under to act cautiously with them. I understand my Lady Clanronald lately received a letter from L[ord] J[ohn] D[rummon]d with the contents of your last to me which was immediately told Keith so that Mr. Rattrae’s Election was known before my Arrival here. I am sorry L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r should keep such correspondence but there are some people continue long young and consequently ought to be looked upon as Children.

This is the first chance I’ve had to write since I left Paris; otherwise, you might think I wouldn't have missed the opportunity to get in touch with you a long time ago. I got your letter dated November 22nd from Mr. Smith in London, but since Mr. Rattrae hasn’t been in town and I haven't found a reliable way to send them, the two enclosed papers are still with me. However, I’ve been told he plans to come here soon, and I’ll make sure to deliver them with the cipher then. I’m quite hopeful that the King's choice of him will help bring them together, as they have addressed him for some time as the eldest of the College to oversee the Diocese during the vacancy. I sincerely appreciate your wise advice regarding my behavior with them, and you can count on me to follow it strictly. From what I told you about Mr. Keith’s procedures, you’ll be even more convinced of how necessary it is for me to act carefully with them. I understand Lady Clanronald recently received a letter from Lord John Drummond that included the contents of your last message to me, which Mr. Keith was informed of, so Mr. Rattrae's election was known before I arrived here. I regret that Lord Traquair is maintaining such correspondence, but there are some people who remain young for a long time and should consequently be regarded as children.

Upon my return to London having the fortune to be[Pg 21] entirely trusted by Coll. Cicel and Mr. Smith, I made it my business to inform myself as particularly as possible of their grounds of Quarrel with L[ord] Semple, when I found they both agreed in the following Accusations, 1mo. That he had been employed by means of the Dutchess of Buccingham and Coll. Cicel to transack some little affairs and from that time had assumed to himself the Character of Minister for the King’s friends in England. 2d. That by his Behaviour to Or[mon]d and L[ord] Marshall he had entirely disobliged them whose friendship he ought by any means to have Cultivate. 3tio. He had been grossly deceived by the Cardinal who had made him believe twenty things he had no intention of Performing. 4to. He was so credulous in beleiving the Cardinal’s assertions as to write from time to time in terms only fitt some weeks before an invasion. 5to. He seemed to ack the part rather of a French than Brittish minister. 6to. He seemed to turn his politicks into a kind of Mechanicks and made a trade of them. 7to. He contradicted himself not only in a different but even in the same letter, by saying that the Cardinal was so well satisfied with the offers made him and the information he had gott that he desired no further and in the same letter advises Coll. Cicel still to inform him further so that he might determine the Cardinal more and more to act in his Majesty’s favours. 8to. He acted imprudently by transmitting to Coll. Cicel the Commissions sent him by the King to dispose of in so large a Packet that Mr. Smith could not conceal them in the Ship and at the same time wrote a long letter with a great many trifles of what had passed betwixt him and the Cardinal in Closs Cypher who, he insinuate, he entirely managed and all relating to the Commissions in plain English. 9to. His coming over was not only without the knowledge of but disagreeable to the King’s friends in England, that my L[ord] Barramore[147] and he were vastly uneasy about it and gave him all the Civil[Pg 22] usage and fair Words they could in Prudence so as to make him leave the place least he should be taken up. 10to. He is not trusted by the King’s friends in England. 11to. He was not even trusted by the Cardinal notwithstanding he pretended he had so much to say with him and given this instance that he, the Cardinal, sent a proposal to the King’s friends by Mr. Bussie[148] at London of landing a body of Swedes[149] in the Country which he seemed greatly surprised at when told by L[ord] Barrimore and that he should afterwards have greatly repented telling him, imagining when he went over he would make a handle of this information to show how he was trusted by the[Pg 23] English. 12to. That Coll. Cicel told him at parting that provided the Cardinal was explicite he would inform him of everything that was necessary but as he saw that was not like to be the case he never had wrote him anything which was sufficient to show him he was not trusted and that he and L[ord] Barrimore particularly complained of L[ord] Semple’s intruding himself into the management of their affairs, and Lastly that he was quite drunk with his ministerial office and acted so high and mightily a part as even to intermiddle betwixt the King and Dutchess of Buckingham. These so far as I can remember are the sum of their Accusations, which I could have reduced into the compass of a few lines were it not I thought it my duty to write in as plain and minute a manner as possible whatever I have learnt having an Eye to nothing but truth and to give the King all the information in my power so that if I have acted out of my sphere I hope you will interceed for my forgiveness. I only beg leave to say that from the little knowledge I have of L[ord] Semple I take him to be a man of great honour and possessed of much greater abilities than any of his Accusors.[150]

Upon returning to London, fully trusted by Coll. Cicel and Mr. Smith, I made it my priority to learn as much as I could about their issues with L[ord] Semple. I found that they both agreed on the following accusations: 1. He had been enlisted by the Duchess of Buckingham and Coll. Cicel to handle some minor affairs, and since then, he had taken on the role of a minister for the King’s supporters in England. 2. His behavior toward Or[mon]d and L[ord] Marshall had completely alienated them, whose friendship he should have cultivated. 3. He had been badly misled by the Cardinal, who made him believe many things he had no intention of following through on. 4. He was so gullible in trusting the Cardinal’s claims that he wrote in a way that hinted at an imminent invasion just weeks before it happened. 5. He seemed to adopt the role of a French rather than a British minister. 6. He appeared to treat politics like a business and made a trade out of it. 7. He contradicted himself not only in different letters but even within the same letter, claiming that the Cardinal was satisfied with the offers and information provided, yet advised Coll. Cicel to continue informing him further to persuade the Cardinal to act in favor of the King. 8. He acted foolishly by sending Coll. Cicel the King’s commissions in such a large package that Mr. Smith couldn’t hide them on the ship, while simultaneously writing a long letter full of trivial matters in a secret code, insinuating that he had complete control over the Cardinal, all concerning the commissions in plain English. 9. His arrival was not only unknown to but also unwelcome by the King’s friends in England; my L[ord] Barramore and others were quite uneasy about it and treated him with all the civility and kind words they could muster in order to make him leave before he was detained. 10. He is not trusted by the King’s friends in England. 11. He was also not trusted by the Cardinal, despite his claims that he had significant discussions with him. The Cardinal even sent a proposal to the King’s friends via Mr. Bussie in London about landing a group of Swedes in the country, which surprised him when L[ord] Barramore informed him, and he later regretted sharing that information, thinking that his visit would allow him to show how trusted he was by the English. 12. Finally, Coll. Cicel told him at their parting that as long as the Cardinal was clear, he would share everything necessary with him. However, since it seemed that wouldn’t happen, he never wrote anything that would indicate he was trusted. He and L[ord] Barrimore specifically complained about L[ord] Semple's interference in managing their affairs, and ultimately that he behaved arrogantly and took such a high-handed approach that he even intervened between the King and the Duchess of Buckingham. These, as far as I can recall, summarize their accusations. I could have condensed this into a few lines, but I felt it was my duty to document what I've learned as clearly and thoroughly as possible, aiming solely for accuracy to keep the King informed. If I have overstepped my role, I hope you will advocate for my forgiveness. I just want to emphasize that from my limited knowledge of L[ord] Semple, I believe him to be a man of great honor and possessing far greater abilities than any of his accusers.

I parted with L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r about a fortnight ago when he sett out for London with a view to bring the English to Concert matters so as to be able to act this summer. The Gentlemen of the Concert are highly dissatisfied with their behaviour they say they have been ready to act for some years past, putt to a great expense in Cultivating a friendship and intimacy with their Vassals, keeping a great many otherwise useless fellows in their Grounds and often obliged to give very advantagious [terms] to their tennants for fear of disobliging them, whereas on the other hand they, the English, do nothing but make a noise and complain of their Oppression.

I parted ways with Lord Traquair about two weeks ago when he left for London to get the English involved in Concert matters so they can perform this summer. The gentlemen of the Concert are really unhappy with their behavior; they say they've been ready to perform for years, spending a lot of money to cultivate friendships and relationships with their vassals, keeping many otherwise useless people on their properties, and often having to offer very favorable terms to their tenants to avoid upsetting them. Meanwhile, the English just make noise and complain about being oppressed.

The situation of things are such at present that had they any Resolution att all they would almost without stroke of[Pg 24] sword putt an end to the cause but in place of that they draw a cross one another and run into little political partys so that if they are not brought to engage heartyly so as to be able to act this summer we give up all hopes of ever bringing them to act in Concert with us. Had the King’s friends in a body used means to favour the Restoration they could not have done it to better purpose than the present Government. There are now 16,000 men out of the Country, 6 Regiments more partly gone, the rest going, only about twenty thousand in England[151] nine parts of ten of which are as raw and undisciplined as those to come against them, The Duke of Hannover[152] going over and in short every soul—Whigg and Torry, Republican, etc.,—disobliged and irritated to the last degree, so that we to be sure are able to do more of ourselves at this juncture then we could do with the assistance of 10000 men were these Troops returned.

The current situation is such that if they had any determination at all, they could almost without a fight put an end to the issue. Instead, they divide themselves into small political factions, and if they don’t come together and commit to action this summer, we lose all hope of ever getting them to work with us. If the King’s supporters had united to support the Restoration, they couldn’t have done it more effectively than the current Government. Right now, there are 16,000 men out of the country, with 6 more regiments partly gone and the rest leaving. Only about twenty thousand remain in England, most of whom are as inexperienced and undisciplined as those we’ll face. The Duke of Hannover is heading out, and frankly, everyone—Whig, Tory, Republican, etc.—is thoroughly discontented and frustrated. So, we are certainly capable of achieving more on our own right now than we could with the help of 10,000 men if those troops were back.

L[ochie]l with whom I have Occasion often to talk on this subject gives it as his Opinion that the Highlanders have now for so long time been in hopes of something being done and now seeing so fair an Opportunity, will probably unless brought into Action once this Summer or harvest give up all thought of ever seeing a Restoration and he is afraid every one will do the best they can by endeavouring to catch at part of his Country before she sink entirely and I am really affraid it will be the case with some of the least steady amongst them. He is thoroughly convinced that with 20,000 Stand of arms his Majesty or the Prince with a good General and some Officers att our head, Scotland is well able to do the whole affair, and indeed it is not only his, but the opinion of several others I talk to in this place upon that subject, as in this case none would be exempt from carrying arms and things are now quite changed from what they were formerly when[Pg 25] a simelar proposal[153] was made. This I could not fail acquainting you with least L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s journey[Pg 26] don’t take effect and this irrecoverable opportunity lost by the further delay of the English, and indeed any delay may prove of the worst consequence as the death of either L[ord] L[ova]t or Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] who are both old men will greatly weaken if not entirely ruin the Concert as there are few to be found who can fill their places. L[ochie]l desires me to mention the great use General Keith would be off. The Highlanders having got the same notion of him they formerly had of Lord Dundee. Drumelzier and his Brother have been all this winter at Tangiers and propose to pass all the Watters where General Keith and Lord Crawford[154] were tho’ some people imagine D[rumelzier] will come home upon account of his Lady’s death,[155] they give it out here that Mr. Hay is very well. I wrote a letter two weeks ago to L[ord] Marshall a Copy of which with the Motives that induced me to write you shall have first occasion but the bearer being ready to sett out putts a stop to my doing of it at present.—I am, Yours, etc.

L[ochie]l, with whom I often discuss this topic, believes that the Highlanders have been hoping for action for quite some time, and now that they see a promising opportunity, if they aren’t mobilized this summer or harvest, they might completely lose hope for a restoration. He fears that everyone will try to claim a piece of their country before it completely falls apart, and I honestly worry this might happen with some of the less committed among them. He is convinced that with 20,000 arms, either His Majesty or the Prince, along with a good General and some officers to lead us, Scotland is fully capable of handling the whole situation. In fact, this is not just his view but the belief of several others I talk to here about this matter, as in this scenario, no one would be exempt from carrying arms. Things have significantly changed from what they were like before when [Pg 25] a similar proposal[153] was made. I had to let you know this so that L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s journey[Pg 26] doesn’t happen and this invaluable opportunity is lost due to further delays by the English, and honestly, any delay could have serious consequences since the death of either L[ord] L[ova]t or Sir J[ames] C[ampbell], both of whom are old men, would significantly weaken or even ruin the plan, as there are few who could step into their roles. L[ochie]l asked me to mention how useful General Keith would be, as the Highlanders now hold him in the same regard they once had for Lord Dundee. Drumelzier and his brother have spent the entire winter in Tangiers and plan to cross all the waters where General Keith and Lord Crawford[154] were, although some believe D[rumelzier] might return due to his wife's death.[155] Here, they say Mr. Hay is doing very well. I wrote a letter two weeks ago to L[ord] Marshall, a copy of which, along with the reasons for writing to you, I will share at the first opportunity, but since the messenger is ready to leave, I can’t do it right now.—I am, Yours, etc.

The ship not sailing as soon as I was made believe I took the opportunity of writing Mr. Edgar the reason of my writting to L[ord] Marshall I shall here subjoin with a Copy of the Letter I wrote his Lordship.

The ship not sailing as soon as I was led to believe gave me the chance to write to Mr. Edgar about why I was writing to Lord Marshall. I will include a copy of the letter I sent to his Lordship here.

Murray to Edgar

Sir,—When Mr. Smith and I happened to be frequently together at London he took reason to complain of the letter my L[ord] Semple had wrote to L[ord] Marshall and particularly of that paragraph where my L[ord] hints that possibly the Scots folks were offended with my L[ord] Marshall not taking sufficient notice of them in proportion to the regard they had shown him he insisted greatly an invincible attachment his Lordship had for the King....

Sir,—When Mr. Smith and I were often together in London, he expressed his concerns about the letter my Lord Semple wrote to Lord Marshall, especially the part where my Lord suggests that perhaps the Scots were upset that Lord Marshall didn’t seem to acknowledge them enough, considering the respect they had shown him. He strongly emphasized his Lordship's unwavering loyalty to the King....

The rest of this page not legible.

The rest of this page is not readable.

[Pg 27]

[Pg 27]

Upon this I thought I should be greatly to blame if I lost any opportunity that occurred to better his Majesty’s affairs by endeavouring to reconceal and unite his friends so that as I imagine his Lordship authorised Mr. Smith to talk upon a suspicion that there might be some grounds for what L[ord] Semple advanced and thereby to reconceal himself to his countrymen I was resolved as we say to putt a Thorne in his foot as he knows I am instituted by the King’s friends here and would not advance anything contrary to their Sentiments. You will be surprised I should write this to you in so closs a Cypher....

Upon this, I thought I would really be at fault if I missed any chance to improve his Majesty’s situation by trying to conceal and unite his friends. As I understand it, his Lordship allowed Mr. Smith to speak on a suspicion that there might be some truth to what L[ord] Semple suggested, and to thereby conceal himself from his countrymen. I was determined, as we say, to put a thorn in his side, as he knows I am supported by the King’s friends here and wouldn’t suggest anything against their views. You might be surprised that I’m writing this to you in such a close cipher....

The rest of this page not legible.

The rest of this page is not readable.

After reflecting upon what you had been so good as to inform me off I could not fail to write the enclosed as I have all the reason in the World to believe you my friend, so I take the liberty to beg that after perusal in case you find it not too assuming and in a stile sufficiently respectly you will be so good as take the trouble to deliver it with an appology.... [Not legible.]

After thinking about what you kindly told me, I felt I had to write the enclosed letter because I have every reason to believe you are my friend. So, I’d like to ask you, after reading it, if you find it not too forward and in a style respectful enough, to please take the time to deliver it with an apology.... [Not legible.]

(Signed) J. Broun.[156]

(Signed) J. Broun.[156]

Murray to Earl Marischal[157]

My Lord,—I heartyly regreted it was not in my power when so near as London to do myself the honour of waiting upon your Lordship for Reasons I beg Mr. Smith to give and at the same time assure your Lordship that without the honour of being known to you there was none who had a more hearty and sincere Regard for your Lordship’s property.... [Not legible.] my Lord, abstracting from your many private Virtues makes you dear to every true Scotsman and from what I could easily learn gives your Lordship great weight with the English. This, my Lord, encourages me to suggest of what use you may be att this juncture to his Majesty’s affairs by uniting those people together who to my great concern I found (so far as I could judge) quite inactive,[Pg 28] diffident of one another and distrustfull of those they employ. Your Lordship’s being so near them will I hope make the work short as well as Effectual, and in my poor Judgement were there any unanimity, any harmony and concord amongst them it would easily be in our power to shake off the yoke of Bondage and Slavery we now groan under; this, my Lord, I propose with great submission to your Lordship’s serious reflection and experience, I shall only add that as I have no other in any thing I do but to promote the real Interest of my King and Country so I have all the reason in the world to believe that healing the wounds and cementing the differences now subsisting amongst our Neighbours is the greatest ambition of our countrymen and must render their gratitude to your Lordship for so great a work unalterable. I begg your Lordship will pardon my presumption in writing without being asked and believe I am with the most sincere regard and esteem, My Lord, etc.[158]

My Lord,—I sincerely regret that I couldn’t take the opportunity to visit you while I was so close in London. I ask Mr. Smith to explain my reasons and assure you that even though we are not acquainted, there is no one who holds your Lordship’s interests in higher regard. [Not legible.] My Lord, setting aside your many personal virtues makes you cherished by every true Scotsman, and from what I've gathered, it also grants your Lordship considerable influence with the English. This, my Lord, encourages me to suggest how you might be useful at this time for His Majesty’s affairs by bringing together those people who, to my great concern, I found to be quite inactive, unsure of one another, and distrustful of those they work with. Being so close to them should hopefully make the task both quick and effective, and in my humble opinion, if there were any unity, harmony, and agreement among them, it would be easy for us to throw off the burden of oppression and slavery we are currently enduring. My Lord, I propose this with great respect for your serious consideration and experience. I will add that my only intention in everything I do is to promote the true interests of my King and Country, and I truly believe that healing the divisions and mending the rifts among our neighbors is the greatest aspiration of our countrymen, which would ensure their lasting gratitude to your Lordship for such a significant endeavor. I ask your Lordship to forgive my boldness in writing without an invitation, and please know that I hold you in the highest regard and esteem, My Lord, etc. [158]

These two preceding letters I gave to my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r on the 5th of Aprile 1743, the day before his Lordship sett out from his own house to London which he was to show Mr. McGregar who told my Lord that this was not a time to send such letters and besides that the letter to Lord Marshall was not such an one he proposed, by which means they never went. I shall here mention what occurred to me what was the reason for Mr. McGregars stoping them never having any further reason given than the above and not knowing even that till L[ord T]raq[uai]r’s return to Scotland, during the short stay I made att London after my return from Paris in company with Mr. McGregar as I said before I made it my business to learn of Coll. Cicel and Mr. Smith all the Complaints they[Pg 29] had against Lord Semple and Mr. McGregar which I generally communicated to him being then fully perswaded of their Honesty and Abilitys. Upon telling him what Mr. Smith had said in relation to Lord Marshall he purposed I should write to his Lordship a Letter in the same Stile Lord Semple had done, purposely to let him know how little he was in favour with his Countrymen and show him how much their liking depended upon his being well with them two, and att the same time to acquaint him that his Countrymen’s regard went no further than so far as he should act entirely conformable to the King’s will, he saying that Lord Marshall pretended to stand entirely upon his own legs from the great Number of Admirers he had in Scotland, and imagined that unless he was the sole manager of the King’s affairs his Majesty’s subjects would not be brought to act for him, in short that he looked upon the King’s interest to depend upon [him] alone. I suppose he thought by my writing in this stile to draw something from Lord Marshall undervalueing of his Countrymen whereby to hurt him with the generality but particularly with those of the Concert who had first employed and still supported him, whereby he might verify to them what he had so long advance against his Lordship, but this was a thing I refused for many reasons; first that it must hurt the King’s affairs to create differences amongst his friends of which their then subsisted too many; secondly it was running myself headlong into a party quarrel, a thing I ever had the worst oppinion off; and thirdly, not to be too tedious in giving many more, it was a thing I had not the smallest tittle to do. But on the contrary I thought it was a fair opportunity of uniting people together and commencing a Correspondence with Lord Marshall whereby if I gain his friendship and confidence I [should] thereby be enabled to inform the King of the pleas of both partys without letting either of them know of it, which is acting a part some people may think odd as it is seemingly playing with both hands, but in my Eyes not only honourable but my duty, when for the King’s interest, I receive from time to time letters from[Pg 30] L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r when att London informing me in his way of his success with the English; but as there was nothing material in them and that they were signed by himself I did not care to keep them in case of accidents. Some time in the month of June I received the following letter from Mr. Edgar with two enclosed from the King himself in answer to two I had wrote when at Paris.

These two earlier letters were given to my Lord Traquair on April 5, 1743, the day before he left his house for London, where he was to meet Mr. McGregor. Mr. McGregor told my Lord that this wasn't the right time to send such letters and mentioned that the letter to Lord Marshall wasn't what he intended, resulting in them not being sent. I want to explain why Mr. McGregor stopped them, as I never received any further reasoning beyond what I've stated, and I didn't learn of it until Lord Traquair returned to Scotland. During my brief stay in London after returning from Paris, I made it a point to find out from Colonel Cecil and Mr. Smith all the complaints they had against Lord Semple and Mr. McGregor, which I generally shared with him since I believed in their honesty and abilities. When I mentioned what Mr. Smith said regarding Lord Marshall, he suggested I write to his Lordship a letter similar to the one Lord Semple had sent, specifically to let him know how little favor he had among his fellow countrymen and to show that their support depended on his relations with those two. At the same time, I was to inform him that their regard would only go as far as his actions aligned with the King’s wishes. He asserted that Lord Marshall claimed to be entirely self-reliant due to the many admirers he had in Scotland and believed that unless he managed the King’s affairs alone, his Majesty’s subjects wouldn’t be inclined to support him—essentially thinking that the King’s interests depended solely on him. I suppose he thought that by having me write in this way, he'd provoke Lord Marshall to undervalue his countrymen, which would damage his reputation with the majority, especially with those who had originally employed and continued to support him, allowing him to prove his long-held criticisms against Lord Marshall. However, I refused for several reasons: first, creating divisions among the King's friends would harm the King's interests, as there were already too many issues among them; second, I didn't want to be dragged into a party dispute, a situation I’ve always thought poorly of; and third, without elaborating further, this was simply not something I had any business with. On the contrary, I thought it was a good opportunity to unite people and start a correspondence with Lord Marshall, which could help me gain his friendship and trust. This way, I could inform the King of the grievances from both sides without either party knowing, a strategy some might see as odd since it appears to play both sides, but to me, it seemed both honorable and my duty, especially for the King's interest. I occasionally received letters from Lord Traquair while in London, updating me on his dealings with the English; however, since they contained nothing significant and were signed by him, I didn’t keep them for fear of potential issues. In June, I received a letter from Mr. Edgar, including two responses from the King himself to two letters I had sent while in Paris.

Copy Mr. Edgar’s letter, dated March 14th, 1743.

Copy Mr. Edgar’s letter, dated March 14, 1743.

Edgar to Murray

Sir,—You will see by the enclosed I send you from our friend Mr. Edwards (he means the King) that he leaves me nothing to say in return to your two letters of the 18th and 25th of february. This Packet is sent open to Lord Semple to forward to you, you will see it is write in his Cypher, a Copy of which I know Mr. McGregor left with L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r so I reckon you may easily gett this read, for suppose you may have that Cypher in your own Custody. You will be glad to know that the family is well, I heartyly wish you all health and happiness and longing to have the pleasure of Embracing you, I am with great Esteem, etc.

Dude,—As you'll see from the enclosed letter from our friend Mr. Edwards (who refers to the King), I have nothing to add in response to your two letters dated February 18th and 25th. This packet is being sent open to Lord Semple to pass along to you. You'll notice it's written in his cipher, a copy of which I know Mr. McGregor left with Lord Traquair, so I imagine you can easily read it, since you might have that cipher in your possession. You'll be pleased to know that the family is well. I sincerely wish you all health and happiness and I look forward to the pleasure of embracing you. I am, with great esteem, etc.

Letter from the Chevalier to John Murray.

Letter from the Chevalier to John Murray.

The Chevalier de St. George to Murray

I received a few days ago yours of the 18th of February and am far from disaproving your comming into France att this Time.[159] The Settling of a Correspondence betwixt us on this Side of the Sea and our friends in Scotland may be of consequence in this juncture I hope you will have concerted some safe method for this effect with Lord Semple before you leave him and that once determined you will I think have done very well to return home where you may be of more use than abroad. I shall say nothing here of what’s passing in France of which you will have been informed by Lord Semple, and you may be well[Pg 31] assured that depends upon me to induce the French to assist us as is reasonable to hope they will if their be a general war. But if they ever undertake anything in my favour, I shall to be sure have little warning of it before and by consequence I fear it will be impossible that General Keith can come in time into Scotland how much soever both I, and I am perswaded himself also, desires it because you will easily see that one of his rank and distinction cannot well quite the Service he is in either abruptly or upon an uncertainty. I remark all you say to me on that subject and when the time comes it shall be my care to dispose all such matters in as much as in me lys for what I may then think for the real good of my Service and for my friends Satisfaction also for in such sort of particulars it is scarce possible to take proper Resolutions before the time of Execution. I had some time ago a proposal made me in Relation to the Seizing of Stirling Castle[160] what I then heard and what you now say on that subject is so general, that I think it is not impossible but that the two proposals may be found originally one and the same project; I wish therefore you would enter a little more into particulars that I may be the better able to determine what directions to send. As to what is represented about the Vassals I suppose what you mean is the same with what I have inserted in a draught of a Declaration for Scotland I have long had by me, viz., That the Vassals of those who should appear against my forces on a landing should be freed of their Vassalidge and hold immediately of the Crown provided such Vassals should declare for me and join heartyly in my Cause. As this is my intention I allow my[Pg 32] friends to make such prudent use of it as they may think fitt. Before you gett this you will probably have received what was wrote to you from hence about the Scotts Episcopal Clergy so that I need say nothing on that subject here more than that I hope the steps taken by me will give satisfaction and promote union in that Body.

I received your letter from February 18 a few days ago and I definitely support your coming to France at this time. The establishment of a correspondence between us here and our friends in Scotland may be significant right now. I hope you and Lord Semple have figured out a safe way to do this before you leave him, and once it’s settled, I believe it would be wise for you to return home where you can be more helpful than abroad. I won’t discuss what’s happening in France here, because Lord Semple will have informed you, and you can be assured that I will do my best to encourage the French to assist us, as we reasonably hope they will if there’s a general war. However, if they take any action in my favor, I fear I won’t have much warning, and as a result, I’m concerned that General Keith won’t be able to reach Scotland in time, no matter how much both he and I wish it. You can easily see that someone of his rank and status can’t leave his current service abruptly or without certainty. I’m noting everything you tell me on this subject, and when the time comes, I will do my best to manage these matters for the genuine benefit of my service and to satisfy my friends because with such specifics, it’s hard to make the right decisions before the actual moment of action. Some time ago, I received a proposal regarding the seizure of Stirling Castle. What I heard then and what you mention now on that topic is so general that it seems the two proposals may actually be the same project. Therefore, I wish you would provide more details so I can better determine what instructions to give. Regarding what you said about the vassals, I believe you mean the same thing as what I included in a draft declaration for Scotland I’ve had for a while: that the vassals of those who oppose my forces upon landing should be freed from their vassalage and hold directly from the Crown, provided those vassals declare for me and wholeheartedly join my cause. This is my intention, and I allow my friends to use this information wisely as they see fit. By the time you receive this, you will probably have gotten the message sent to you about the Scottish Episcopal clergy, so I won’t add much more except to say that I hope my actions will satisfy and promote unity within that group.

It is a great comfort to me to see the Gentlemen of the Concert so zealous so united and so frank in all that relates to my service and I desire you will say all that is kind to them in my name, I remark you have advanced one hundred pounds of your own money[161] for Sir J[ames] C[ampbe]ll which I take very well of you but I desire you would not give me any more proofs of that kind of your goodwill towards me and as for what is past I look upon it as a personal Debt and shall take care that it be repayed, I remark what you say about the difficulty their is of raising money I foresaw that would be no easy matter and think it should not be insisted upon, I think I have now taken notice of all that required any answer in what you wrote to me and Edgar and shall add nothing further here but to assure you of the continuance of any good opinion of you and that your prudent and zealous indeavours toward my service shall never be forgott by me.

It really comforts me to see the gentlemen of the concert so enthusiastic, united, and straightforward in everything that relates to my service. Please convey my kind regards to them in my name. I noticed you lent one hundred pounds of your own money for Sir J[ames] C[ampbe]ll, which I truly appreciate, but I wish you wouldn't feel the need to demonstrate your goodwill to me in that way again. As for the past, I consider it a personal debt, and I will make sure it gets repaid. I understand what you said about the difficulty of raising money; I anticipated that it wouldn't be easy and think it shouldn't be pushed too hard. I believe I've addressed everything that needed a response from what you wrote to me and Edgar, and I'll add nothing more here except to assure you that my good opinion of you remains unchanged and that your thoughtful and dedicated efforts on my behalf will never be forgotten.

(Signed) J. Edwards.[162]

Dated March 11th, 1743.

(Signed) J. Edwards.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Dated March 11, 1743.

At the same time came the following:—

At the same time came the following:—

The Chevalier to Murray

Since I wrote to you on 11th I have seen what you wrote to Edgar of the same date; I remark what you say on extending a Concert in the Low Country and the Method[163] it has been done in the Highlands such a measure[Pg 33] may be a great advantage to the cause and therefore I cannot but much approve of it, provided it be gone about with great prudence and Caution, which I earnestly recommend to you not only on your own account but mine also, for we must in this juncture carefully avoid[Pg 34] anything that may give the Government any jealousie or pretence to molest our friends. I am well pleased to observe what you say of L[ochie]l and if you have occasion make him a kind Compliment from me and the Prince, this is all I have to add or present in this paper.

Since I wrote to you on the 11th, I’ve seen what you wrote to Edgar on the same day. I noticed your thoughts on extending a Concert in the Low Country and the method it has been done in the Highlands; such a move may significantly benefit our cause. Therefore, I fully support it, as long as it’s approached with great caution, which I strongly recommend for both your sake and mine. We must carefully avoid any actions that might arouse any jealousy or provide the Government with a reason to interfere with our friends. I'm glad to see your comments about L[ochie]l. If you have the chance, please pass on a kind compliment from me and the Prince. That’s all I have to add in this note.

Signed as befor and dated 14th, 1743.

Signed as before and dated 14th, 1743.

In the first letter I wrote to Mr. Edgar after my return home I told him that the Packet for Bishop Rattrae was still in my Custody being informed that he intended to be soon in town so thought it fitt to delay doing any thing in it till he should come, accordingly whenever I heard of his arrival I went immediately to the Country where the Cypher Mr. Edgar mentioned there was, and brought it to town with me but to my Surprise found it did not answer. Yett I nevertheless resolved to deliver the Packet to him att the same time reading the paragraph in mine concerning it so sent for Mr. Rae[164] one of the Presbyters in Edinburgh and told him I wished to see Mr. Rattrae and desired he would go to him and acquaint him with my intention and make an appointment for me which he agreed to do next mourning. He came to me on the morrow and told me had missed him but would indeavour to find him sometime that day upon which he left me and found him dinning with his daughter Mrs. —— so delayed it till next morning, but when he went was informed by his daughter Mrs. Clark in whose house he lived that he had been taken ill the night before of an Epidimical Distemper that at that time raged almost all of over Europe of which he died in three or four days illness, by which means that Packet still remains in my Custody, never since having gott any directions about it. From that time I have keept my Resolution of never having any more to do with the Clergy, for when I was asked some few days after by Mr. Rae what I thought they should do in their present situation, I told him I thought they should draw up a full and distinct state of their [affairs][Pg 35] without neglecting the least thing and send it to the King leaving him to determine without any further representations, but shunned writting or taking any Commissions about it, nor do I since know any of their procedure none of them having ever spoke to me on the subject.

In the first letter I wrote to Mr. Edgar after I got back home, I told him that the packet for Bishop Rattrae was still in my possession. I had heard he would be in town soon, so I thought it was best to wait until he arrived before doing anything about it. Whenever I learned of his arrival, I went right to the country to get the cipher Mr. Edgar mentioned and brought it back to town with me, but to my surprise, it didn't work. Still, I decided to deliver the packet to him while also reading the paragraph from my letter about it. I sent for Mr. Rae, one of the presbyters in Edinburgh, and asked him to let Mr. Rattrae know I wanted to see him and to set up an appointment for me, which he agreed to do the next morning. He came to me the next day and told me he missed him but would try to find him later that day. He left me and found Mr. Rattrae having dinner with his daughter Mrs. ——, so he postponed it until the following morning. However, when he went back, he was informed by Mrs. Clark, Mr. Rattrae's daughter, that he had become ill the night before with an epidemic illness that was sweeping across Europe at the time. He died within three or four days, and as a result, that packet still remains with me, as I've never received any further instructions about it. Since then, I’ve stuck to my resolution of having nothing more to do with the clergy. A few days later, when Mr. Rae asked me what I thought they should do in their situation, I said they should put together a complete and clear account of their affairs without leaving out anything and send it to the King, leaving him to decide without any additional discussions. I avoided writing or taking any assignments regarding it, and I still don’t know what they’ve done since, as none of them has ever spoken to me about it.

About this Time the Duke of P[erth] came from England and as L[ochie]l and [I] had often Schemed together what we ourselves were able to do in the present posture of affairs and seemed to agree in Opinion that should the french disapoint us we were more able to restore the King by our own strength during the absence of the Army than with the Assistance of 10,000 men were our Troops once returned, for which reason did the English fail to give the assurances to the french they required, but we should gett the people at home to take it in hand by themselves. With this View I had already wrote Mr. Edgar on that Strain and now we agreed to sound the Duke of P[erth] on the same Subject which we did and found him abundantly forward. He was then going to the Country and Sir A[lexander] Mc[Donal]d[165] was with his brother-in-law A[irl]y so desired the Duke would try him and some days after had a letter from hime wherein he said that he had spoke to him as was agreed and found him very keen that he said the sooner it was done the better and in place of 700 men which his Uncle carried with him in the year 1715 he would now bring 1200. At the same time when his Grace was talking to us in Edinburgh on this subject he said the people in that part of the Country where he had come from very honest and that the Mayer and Aldermen had spoke to him in the strongest terms, which he then told us, and desired I might acquaint the King of it, so I desired his Grace would putt it in writting and that I should not fail to transmit it to his Majesty; upon which he went to another room and brought me a sheet[Pg 36] of paper mostly write which I did not care to transmitt in his own words but abridged it; however shall say no more of it here as I will putt down the letter I wrote the King and another to Mr. Edgar. I must only observe that I read the Duke’s memorial to my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r att his own house upon giving him some paper he had putt in my custody att his leaving Scotland, at which time his Lordship and I agreed to put it in the fire as the letter I had wrote and which I att the same time read to my Lord contained the substance of it, this I have frequently repented since, as his Grace’s memory did not seem to serve him exactly to what he had wrote. In answer to his Majesty’s I wrote the following, Dated July 5th, 1743:—

About this time, the Duke of Perth returned from England. Lochiel and I had often discussed what we could do given the current situation and agreed that if the French disappointed us, we’d be better off trying to restore the King with our own strength during the Army's absence rather than relying on 10,000 men once our troops returned. This was the reason the English failed to provide the assurances the French needed, but we believed we could encourage people back home to take charge themselves. With this in mind, I had already written to Mr. Edgar about it, and we agreed to gauge the Duke of Perth's views on the same topic. When we did, we found him very enthusiastic. He was planning to go to the countryside, and Sir Alexander McDonald was with his brother-in-law, Airly. So, the Duke was asked to speak with him. A few days later, I received a letter from him stating that he had spoken to him as planned and found him very eager. He said the sooner it happened the better, and instead of the 700 men his uncle brought in 1715, he would now bring 1,200. At the same time, when his Grace was discussing this with us in Edinburgh, he mentioned that the people from his region were very honest, and the Mayor and Aldermen had spoken to him very strongly about it, which he wanted me to inform the King about. So, I asked him to put it in writing so I could pass it on to His Majesty. He then went to another room and brought me a mostly written sheet of paper, which I didn't want to send in his exact words, so I summarized it. However, I won’t say more about it here since I will write down the letter I sent to the King and another to Mr. Edgar. I must just note that I read the Duke’s memorial to my Lord Traquair at his house while giving him some papers he left with me when he left Scotland. At that time, his Lordship and I agreed to burn it since the letter I had written and was reading to my Lord contained the same information. I have often regretted this since the Duke’s memory didn’t seem to serve him perfectly concerning what he had written. In response to His Majesty’s letter, I wrote the following, dated July 5th, 1743:—

Murray to the Chevalier

Sir,—I had the honour of your Majesty’s commands some weeks ago of the 11th of March. I communicated the paragraph of your Majesty’s relating to the certainty of General Keith’s coming to Scotland to the Duke of P[erth] and L[ochie]l who are equally well satisfied with what your Majesty is pleased to say on that subject. Your Majesty’s Declaration with regard to the Scotts Vassals and the Liberty you are most graciously pleased to grant of insinuating so much to them give L[ochie]l extream pleasure being convinced it will tend greatly to promote your Majesty’s interest. The Duke of P[erth] desired me to acquaint your Majesty that the Mayer and Aldermen of York had freely opened their minds to him on the Subject of the Restoration and gave him a Commission humble to Represent their Loyalty and firm attachment to your Majesty’s cause. They engage that upon hearing of your Majesty’s aproach with a Sufficient Body to support them they will raise 10,000 men in that County and have no doubt of an equal Number from the Countys Adjacent. There are two gentlemen one of them a present member the other was last parliament but declined it these have the Sole management of the County and did they appear would certainly be followed by every one in it. His Grace had not the good fortune to see[Pg 37] them they being at London but left them his Compliments by some of their friends who assured him they were ready upon your Majesty’s desire to enter into any Scheme to promote your Majesty’s interest. His Grace desired me likewise to inform your Majesty that he is fully convinced and may almost affirm that upon shewing an order from your Majesty to treat with them they will sign any declaration or assurance of whatever Nature shall be thought most for your Majesty’s interest and to have the Mayer and Aldermen, at least those of them upon whose Secrecy they can the most depend to do the like. In the Duke’s Memorandum to me he neglected the two Gentlemen’s names. As the Election of their Mayer goes by Rotation it falls next year upon a Whig which his grace thinks can be of no consequence as none of that Kidney have any Interest, in the town, but he was told that notwithstanding the custom, if your Majesty desired it they would indeavour to have another chosen. I shall incroatch no further upon your Majesty’s time having wrote to Mr. Edgar but beg leave to subscribe myself with the greatest Veneration and Duty your Majesty’s, etc.

Sir,—I had the honor of receiving your Majesty’s instructions a few weeks ago on March 11th. I shared your Majesty’s message about the certainty of General Keith coming to Scotland with the Duke of P[erth] and L[ochie]l, who are both very pleased with what your Majesty has indicated on this matter. Your Majesty’s statement regarding the Scotts Vassals and the freedom you graciously grant to communicate this to them brings L[ochie]l great joy, as he believes it will significantly benefit your Majesty’s interests. The Duke of P[erth] asked me to inform your Majesty that the Mayor and Aldermen of York expressed their thoughts to him about the Restoration and gave him a commission to humbly represent their loyalty and strong commitment to your Majesty’s cause. They assure that upon learning of your Majesty’s approach with a sufficient force to support them, they will raise 10,000 men in that County and are confident of matching numbers from the neighboring counties. There are two gentlemen, one a current member and the other who declined last parliament, who have complete control over the County; if they appeared, they would indeed be followed by everyone there. His Grace was not fortunate enough to meet [Pg 37] them, as they were in London, but he sent them his regards through some mutual friends who assured him they were ready, upon your Majesty’s request, to engage in any plan to support your Majesty’s interests. His Grace also wanted me to inform your Majesty that he is quite convinced and can nearly guarantee that if an order from your Majesty to negotiate with them is shown, they will sign any declaration or assurance deemed beneficial for your Majesty’s interests, and have the Mayor and Aldermen, at least those whose discretion they can rely on the most, do the same. In the Duke’s note to me, he forgot to mention the names of the two gentlemen. Since the election of their Mayor goes by rotation, it will fall next year to a Whig, which his grace believes won’t matter since none of that group has any sway in the town, but he was told that despite the custom, if your Majesty wishes, they would try to have someone else chosen. I won’t take up any more of your Majesty’s time, having written to Mr. Edgar, but I respectfully conclude with the utmost veneration and duty, your Majesty’s, etc.

Letter to Mr. Edgar, dated July 5th, 1743.

Letter to Mr. Edgar, dated July 5, 1743.

Murray to Edgar

Since I had the pleasure of receiving your last letter the Duke of P[erth] returned from York after having gott a very possitive and harsh Refusall from the Lady to whom he was making his addresses, during his stay there he had some commissions from the Mayer and Aldermen to the King with which I had the honour to acquaint the King by the enclosed amongst others they begged he might offer their humble Duty and assure him of their unalterable Regard to his Interest. They intended to send his Highness the Duke[166] the freedom of their toun in a Gold Box as the highest mark of their regard for his Highness who does them the honour to bear the Name of their Town but being afraid least a discovery should be made by Workmen or others who would render them the less usefull[Pg 38] to his Majesty they must humbly beg his Highness would look upon the Compliment as real and Honour them with his Acceptance.

Since I had the pleasure of receiving your last letter, the Duke of P[erth] returned from York after getting a very definite and harsh rejection from the lady he was pursuing. During his stay there, he had some commissions from the Mayor and Aldermen to the King, which I had the honor to share with the King in the enclosed letter. Among other things, they asked him to convey their humble respects and assure him of their unwavering commitment to his interests. They planned to send his Highness, the Duke[166], the freedom of their town in a gold box as the highest sign of their appreciation for his Highness, who carries the name of their town. However, fearing that a discovery might be made by workers or others who could make them less useful[Pg 38] to his Majesty, they must humbly request his Highness to see the gesture as genuine and honor them with his acceptance.

L[ochie]l and I spoke to the Duke upon the supposition we should obtain no assistance from France how far he thought it would be prudent at this juncture to undertake the King’s Restoration ourselves. Upon his Grace’s approving of the scheme, I proposed when he went to the Country he should talk to Sir A[lexander] M[acdonal]d upon the same, which he accordingly did, and sent an answer to L[ochie]l wherin he says that found him entirely of the same Opinion, that he seemed to think there was a necessity for it, and that it ought to be done as soon as possible and that in place of 700 men his Uncle brought with him in the year 1715 he would engage to bring 1200. I could not fail to acquaint you with his Opinion, he being the most reserved cautious man I ever knew, and the least apt to say or do anything rashly, everybody is of Opinion the Government designs by all methods to Ruin the Highlands which to be sure makes the Gentlemen fond to have something done before it be out of their power to be of service, especially as there are some of them whose Estates are so low such as G[lengar]ry C[lanranal]d A[p]p[i]n C[ap]p[oc]h that they will be obliged either to sell their lands or conform to the Government through necessity; and am very credibly[167] informed that Ca[p]p[oc]h was this Winter at London on a Scheme of raising an independent Company. Since Mr. Smith came to this place he has insisted with Lo[chie]l to go over to see Lord Marshall who he tells him has had several different accounts of the State of the Highlands so that he is very anxious to talk to him upon that head. L[ochie]l excuses himself from going but told me Mr. Smith supposed his Lordship was informed of everything by the King and that the State given in by Mr. Drummond was just he is certain; but now things are much better and that Mr.[Pg 39] Drummond rather erred in making the number too small[168] being determined to advance nothing but what he could answer for. I had a letter lately from my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r wherein he seems to hint that his Majesty’s friends in England are in a way of acting with more vigour and unanimity than they have hitherto done. I hope they are now become sensible of their weak and groundless prejudices against Lord Semple (a Catalogue of which I sent you in my last) as well as of the necessity there is to act Vigorously and Resolutely for his Majesty’s Restoration. It would seem L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r and Mr. Drummond have not judged it fitt to send my letter to L[ord] Marshall (a Copy of which I sent you in my last) for I have never had the smallest hint of it from Mr. Smith neither has L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r taken occasion to mention it in any of his Letters to me. Upon Bishop Rattrae’s coming to town I went immediately to the Country for the Cypher when I found it did not in the least correspond to that Coll. Urquhart must certainly have been mistaken. I nevertheless resolved to deliver the letters att the same time showing him the paragraph in mine relative to him and to tell him the cause of the mistake, but this day I sent one of his Brethern to acquaint him that I would wait on him in the afternoon, he was abroad and the next day when I sent again found he was taken ill of a Pluirisy of which he died two days after[169] which to be sure is a very great misfortune and not the less so that Mr. Keith is now Senior Bishop, what they are now doing or intend to do I don’t know I have sent you the Cypher inclosed but retained the Letter till further Orders.

L[ochie]l and I talked to the Duke about how wise it would be for us to attempt the King’s Restoration ourselves, assuming we wouldn’t get any help from France. Once his Grace agreed with the plan, I suggested that when he went to the countryside, he should discuss it with Sir A[lexander] M[acdonal]d, which he did, and sent an answer to L[ochie]l saying that he completely agreed. He seemed to think it was necessary and that it should happen as soon as possible. Instead of the 700 men his uncle brought in 1715, he offered to bring 1200. I felt it was important to share his opinion with you since he’s the most cautious and reserved person I’ve ever known, not one to act rashly. Everyone believes the government is trying to ruin the Highlands, which definitely makes the local gentlemen eager to take action before they can’t contribute anymore, especially since some of them, like G[lengar]ry, C[lanranal]d, A[p]p[i]n, and C[ap]p[oc]h, are in such dire financial situations that they may have to sell their estates or yield to the government. I have reliable information that Ca[p]p[oc]h was in London this winter working on a plan to raise an independent company. Since Mr. Smith arrived here, he has been urging L[ochie]l to go see Lord Marshall, who he believes has received various reports about the condition of the Highlands and is very eager to discuss it with him. L[ochie]l declined to go but mentioned that Mr. Smith thought his Lordship was informed of everything by the King, and he’s sure that Mr. Drummond’s report was accurate, though he insists the situation is now much improved and that Mr. Drummond likely understated the number of men, having been cautious about only advancing what he could back up. Recently, I received a letter from my L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r, in which he suggests that the King’s supporters in England are beginning to act with more energy and unity than before. I hope they’ve started to see their unfounded biases against Lord Semple (which I detailed in my last letter) as well as the need to move decisively and vigorously for the King’s Restoration. It seems L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r and Mr. Drummond decided it wasn’t appropriate to send my letter to L[ord] Marshall (a copy of which I also sent you in my last), because I haven’t heard anything about it from Mr. Smith, nor has L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r mentioned it in any of his letters to me. When Bishop Rattrae came to town, I immediately went to the countryside for the cypher, but I found it didn’t match at all. Colonel Urquhart must have made a mistake. Still, I decided to deliver the letters while showing him the part of my letter that mentioned him and explaining the error. Today, I sent one of his brothers to inform him that I would pay him a visit in the afternoon, but he was out. The next day when I checked again, I found he was ill with pleurisy and passed away two days later, which is indeed a significant loss, especially now that Mr. Keith is the senior bishop. I don’t know what they’re currently doing or planning to do. I’ve sent you the cypher enclosed, but I’ve held onto the letter until I get further instructions.

[Pg 40]

[Pg 40]

We had great rejoicings some days ago on account of a Battle said to be gained by the Allies in Germany,[170] but by latter Accounts, the Case seems to have been that the Army of the Allies had gott too far into the Country and finding a Scarcity of provisions (especially amongst the English) they resolved to return from whence they came when they were attacked by a body of French to the number of 25,000 or thereabouts, some write they intended to attack their rear and harrass them on their march, others they proposed intercepting 12,000 Hannoverians and Hessians that were on their march to join the Army, but whatever was their Intention they attacked our foot. Whereupon a very smart engagement ensued, wherein both partys seem to have suffered severely. The French repassed the river and we continued our march and are now gott near to frankfort where its said the Emperor is and talks of a Suspension of Arms I wish too good a peace may not ensue. You certainly cant help laughing when you consider with what Vigour and Success we carry on our war with Spain. Never was a poor Country in so miserable a Condition as we are in att present, neither Money nor Trade nor Credit, nay nor so much as the smallest degree of honour or Character left us. The Duke of P[erth]’s Stay here was so short that I could not gett him to explain his Scheme of Seizing Stirlling Castle, but I wont neglect the first opportunity to have it from him. I am Still obliged to continue the old Cannal of Correspondence not being able while att London to find any Safe Conveyance from thence, but I hope Lord T[ra]q[uai]r will have effectuated that before his return; I have now write everything that occurrs to me I wish may not already have tired you.—So with hearty prayers for the familys wellfare and all friends with you and that we may soon meet on a Solid and happy footing, I beg that you would believe that I ever am, etc.

We had a big celebration a few days ago because the Allies were said to have won a battle in Germany, but according to later reports, it seems the Allies' army ventured too deep into the country and, finding a shortage of supplies (especially among the English), decided to head back when they were attacked by around 25,000 French troops. Some say they planned to hit our rear and harass us during our retreat, while others claim they aimed to intercept 12,000 Hanoverians and Hessians who were heading to join our army. Regardless of their intentions, they attacked our infantry. This led to a fierce clash, and both sides seemed to suffer heavily. The French crossed the river again, and we continued our march, now nearly reaching Frankfurt, where it's rumored the Emperor is discussing a ceasefire. I hope that a favorable peace doesn't come about. You can't help but laugh when you think about the energy and success with which we’re waging our war against Spain. No country has ever been in such a poor state as we are right now—no money, no trade, no credit, not even the slightest bit of honor or reputation left. The Duke of P[erth] was here for such a short time that I couldn't get him to explain his plan to seize Stirling Castle, but I won’t miss the first opportunity to hear it from him. I still have to stick to our old way of keeping in touch because I can't find a safe way to communicate from London, but I hope Lord T[ra]q[uai]r will manage that before his return. I have now written everything that comes to mind; I hope it hasn’t bored you already. So, with heartfelt wishes for your family’s well-being and all our friends with you, and that we may soon meet on solid and happy ground, I ask you to believe that I am always, etc.

Dated July 5th, 1743.

Dated July 5, 1743.

[Pg 41]

[Pg 41]

P.S.—I had almost neglected to tell you that while I was att London I ordered a Countryman of ours to work Six pair of the finest Silk-Stockens he could possibly make, which as they are home manufactory and finest I believe were mad in the Island I have ventured to send them by Mr. Smith to Rome hoping the Prince will do his Country and me the honour to accept of them.

P.S.—I almost forgot to mention that while I was in London, I asked one of our Countrymen to make six pairs of the finest silk stockings he could. Since they are made locally and are the best, I believe they were made on the Island. I've taken the chance to send them to Rome with Mr. Smith, hoping the Prince will do his country and me the honor of accepting them.

My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r having now been three months att London and we all that time receiving no Material accounts of Success things looked as if this Summer would be Spent as well as the former without any Resolution taken of coming to Blows in the Autumn or Winter which made all those of the concert very uneasy but particularly my Lord L[ova]t, so that he seemed to give up all hopes of the Schemes ever succeeding and wrote to L[ochie]l several Letters wherein he resolved to settle his affairs and go to London where, after he had sollicited an appeal he intended to lodge against Chisholm, he would then go over to France with his son. L[ochie]l was so good as show me the most of his Letters and from some things he said, but particularly a paragraph in one of them we had reason to conjecture he proposed to end his days in a Religious house; this we were the more easily induced to believe as his Lordship had now lived to a great age during the most of which he had acted a part in the world not looked upon by the Generality of Mankind in a favourable light. We therefore agreed that L[ochie]l Should write him dissuading him from his design but at the same time he seemed so positive that it was thought Necessary to acquaint the King of it as his Majesty’s orders appeared to us the only mean whereby to prevent his journey, knowing that his leaving the Country would be of the worst Consequence as there was not a man in that part of the Country capable to manage it but himself and in general that his appearing publickly in Arms for the King must be of great Service, for which Reasons the first Occasion that occurred I wrote to the King dated September 5th 1743:

My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r had been in London for three months, and during that time, we hadn’t received any substantial news of success. It seemed like this summer would pass just like the last one, without any plans to take action in the autumn or winter. This situation made everyone involved in the concert quite anxious, especially my Lord L[ova]t, who seemed to have totally lost hope that the plans would ever work out. He wrote multiple letters to L[ochie]l, expressing his intention to settle his affairs and head to London. After seeking an appeal against Chisholm, he planned to go to France with his son. L[ochie]l kindly shared most of his letters with me, and from some of what he wrote, particularly a paragraph in one of them, we suspected he intended to spend his final days in a religious institution. We were inclined to believe this, especially since he had reached a great age, having spent much of his life in a role that most people didn’t view favorably. So, we decided L[ochie]l should write to him, discouraging him from this plan. However, since he seemed so determined, we thought it was necessary to inform the King, as we believed his Majesty’s orders were the only way to prevent his departure. We knew that his leaving the country would have terrible consequences, as there wasn’t anyone else in that part of the country who could manage things like he could. Additionally, his public support for the King would be hugely beneficial. For these reasons, I wrote to the King on September 5th, 1743.

[Pg 42]

[Pg 42]

Murray to the Chevalier

Sir,—I had the honour to write to your majesty the 5th of July last which I hope is come Safe. I have of late seen several Letters from Lord L[ovat] to L[ochie]l wherein he Express great Anxiety and impatience that things are not like to come to a conclusion. I take it to be upon that account that he has settled his affairs att home and is now taking leave of his friends with a Resolution of going this Winter to London there to solicite an appeal and from thence to France with his Son. Your Majesty will see at first View all the inconveniencys that may attend such a procedure more readily than I can express, he being the only man in the Country capable to manage that part of the Country alloted him, and indeed I am afraid from a paragraph in one of his Letters that he has some thoughts of Ending his days in a monastry Since he thinks he cannot do it in your Majestys Service. Affairs abroad seem now to tend more and more to a War with france which Should it happen will I hope putt a Stop to his journey, but failing that I am apt to believe nothing will do save your Majestys orders, etc.

Mr.,—I had the honor of writing to your majesty on July 5th, which I hope has arrived safely. Recently, I have seen several letters from Lord L[ovat] to L[ochie]l expressing his great anxiety and impatience about the lack of progress on certain matters. I believe this is why he has settled his affairs at home and is now saying goodbye to his friends with the intention of going to London this winter to seek an appeal, and then to France with his son. Your Majesty will see at a glance all the issues that could arise from such a plan more easily than I can convey, as he is the only person in the country capable of managing that region assigned to him. Moreover, I am concerned that a line in one of his letters suggests he is considering spending his final days in a monastery since he believes he cannot serve your Majesty effectively. Affairs abroad seem to be increasingly leaning toward war with France, which, if it occurs, I hope will halt his journey. However, if that does not happen, I believe nothing will suffice except your Majesty's orders, etc.

To Mr. Edgar.

To Mr. Edgar.

September 5, 1743.

September 5, 1743.

Murray to Edgar

Sir,—I gave you the trouble of a pretty long Letter the fifth of July last, since which I have not had the pleasure of hearing from you. Lord T[ra]q[uai]r is still att London but proposes to be soon down here, which I heartily wish, some folks being vastly anxious for his return expecting upon that Event to be intirely satisfied as to what may be hoped for from the Kings friends in England. Upon the Highland deserters being shott att London,[171] which has[Pg 43] greatly disobliged their Countrymen, I took it upon me to acquaint some of the Gentlemen that it was his Majestys pleasure they should endeavour to prevent as much as possible any of their followers from inlisting in the Service of the present Government. This I thought the more necessary as a great many of them have been carried out of the Country for some years past, the Dutch having gott several hundreds upon their last Augmentation.[172] My Lord K[e]n[mur]e is returned from Portugall perfectly recovered. I said some obliging things to him in his Majestys Name of gaining the Cameronians (amongst whom he lived) to his Majestys Interest. I am very sensible what a fickle Sett of people they are and how difficult an undertaking of this kind may prove. Yett as Sir Th[oma]s G[ord][o]n of E[arls]t[o]n,[173] a leading man amongst them two years ago, spoke to the late Lord of the precarious Situation of the present Government, and in case of a Restoration begged his protection, this Lord seemed the fitter person to learn his present Sentiments. Your Friend Sir J[ames] S[tewar]t[174] who deservedly well liked by all his acquaintances is to be married to Lord W[emy]ss eldest daughter, a Match made by Lord E[lcho][175] who left this the beginning of Summer and I understand, is now at Boulogne, so that I had no opportunity to deliver the Compliments his Majesty and the Prince honour him with. I beg you will believe me, etc.

Mr.,—I sent you a pretty long letter on July 5th, and since then I haven’t had the pleasure of hearing from you. Lord T[ra]q[uai]r is still in London but plans to come down here soon, which I sincerely hope, as many people are very eager for his return and expect that event to completely clarify what can be anticipated from the King's friends in England. After the Highland deserters were shot in London,[171] this has[Pg 43] greatly upset their fellow countrymen. I took it upon myself to inform some gentlemen that it was His Majesty's wish that they try to prevent as many of their followers as possible from enlisting in the service of the current government. I thought this was particularly necessary since many of them have been taken out of the country for several years now, with the Dutch having recruited several hundred during their last expansion.[172] My Lord K[e]n[mur]e has returned from Portugal completely recovered. I said some kind things to him in His Majesty's name about winning over the Cameronians (among whom he lived) to His Majesty’s interest. I know how fickle these people can be and how challenging this task might be. Yet, Sir Th[oma]s G[ord][o]n of E[arls]t[o]n,[173] a prominent figure among them two years ago, spoke to the late Lord about the precarious situation of the current government, and in light of a possible restoration, asked for his protection, so this Lord seemed a suitable person to gauge his current sentiments. Your friend Sir J[ames] S[tewar]t[174], who is deservedly well-liked by all his acquaintances, is set to marry Lord W[emy]ss's eldest daughter, a match arranged by Lord E[lcho][175], who left here at the beginning of summer and, I understand, is now in Boulogne, so I had no chance to convey the compliments His Majesty and the Prince send him. I beg you to believe me, etc.

[Pg 44]

[Pg 44]

Some time in the month of August the Laird of Mc[Leo]d[176] came to Edinburgh and told L[ochie]l on his way here, who desired he might see him, and that he had several Commissions to us, so desired he would make an appointment with me. When L[ochie]l spoke to me of it I agreed to ride out with him on the Saturday to Peggie Vints where he proposed to dine and see a son of Lord L[ovat]s who was then at the School of Preston,[177] but we were both afraid from his saying that he had several Commissions that his Lordship had been too open with him, contrary to the engagement all these of the Concert had come under to one another; for which reason we resolved to be very cautious and determined, in case we found it as we suspected, to say nothing of it to him. We according mett, dined in the Country and adjurned to the Tavern in Edinburgh where we resolved to give him leave to say or ask as few questions as possible and took occasion to speak a good deal on the present miserable Situation of the Country, and tell him that we thought him one of the fittest Persons we knew to instigate the English to join heartily for promoting the Kings interest, being both a highland man and one of power in the Country;[Pg 45] and at the same time told him it was his Majestys pleasure that the Chiefs of the Clans should allow none of their men to leave the Country. To which he answered that he and Sir A[lexander] Mc[Donal]d had taken care to let none of theirs inlist, and said a good deal of his readiness to serve the King so soon as an occasion should offer, and that he had already during his being att London made it his business to incite and encourage the English to every thing that cou’d conduce to his Majestys interest; and as to Lord L[ova]ts commissions, they turned out only to inquiring about Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and what news or good hopes he had. From this time nothing passed worthy the noticeing, I had some compliments from Lord L[ova]t in his letters to L[ochie]l wherein he acquainted him with the success he had in a Circuit he made over the Country and then gott a Letter or two from himself on these subjects and desiring his Majesty might be acquainted with it and at the same time saying he was resolved to continue at Home in expectation of something satisfactory upon my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r’s return. Upon this I wrote the following Letter to Mr. Edgar, dated October 28th, 1743.

Some time in August, the Laird of Mc[Leo]d[176] came to Edinburgh and told L[ochie]l, who wanted to see him, that he had several commissions for us and asked him to set up a meeting with me. When L[ochie]l mentioned it to me, I agreed to ride out with him on Saturday to Peggie Vints, where he planned to have dinner and see a son of Lord L[ovat]s who was then at the Preston School,[177] but we both worried that, since he said he had several commissions, his Lordship might have been too open with him, which would go against the agreement everyone in the Concert had made with one another. Because of that, we decided to be very cautious and determined that if we discovered it was as we suspected, we wouldn’t mention it to him. We met as agreed, had dinner in the country, and then went to a tavern in Edinburgh, where we decided to let him say or ask as few questions as possible. We took the opportunity to talk a lot about the current miserable situation in the country and told him we thought he was one of the best people we knew to encourage the English to fully support the King’s interests, being both a Highland man and someone influential in the country; [Pg 45] and we also informed him that it was His Majesty’s wish for the Chiefs of the Clans to prevent any of their men from leaving the country. He replied that he and Sir A[lexander] Mc[Donal]d had made sure none of theirs enlisted, and he expressed his willingness to serve the King as soon as an opportunity arose. He mentioned that while he was in London, he made it his mission to incite and encourage the English in anything that would benefit His Majesty’s interests; and regarding Lord L[ova]ts’ commissions, they were just inquiries about Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and what news or good hopes he had. After this, nothing significant happened. I received some compliments from Lord L[ova]t in his letters to L[ochie]l, where he informed him about his successes during a circuit he made across the country. He then sent me a letter or two on these topics, expressing a desire for His Majesty to be informed about it and stating that he was determined to stay at home in anticipation of something satisfactory upon Lord T[ra]q[uai]r’s return. Following this, I wrote the following letter to Mr. Edgar, dated October 28th, 1743.

Murray to Edgar

Sir,[178]—I has the pleasure of writing to you the fifth of[Pg 46] last moneth with one inclosed to his Majesty, which makes me give you the trouble of this to acquaint you that upon L[ochie]ls repeated Letters to Lord L[ovat] together with Copys of my Lord T[ra]q[uai]rs from London which I sent him, he is determined not to stir from home this Winter. I should be greatly to blame did I neglect to inform you that his Lordship has been most assiduous this Summer to promote his Majestys Interest in his district so that I have great reason to believe that he is sure of all those he engaged for. He seems to be in great spirits upon account of his success in his Circuit he lately made over the Country when he gained most of the Monroes,[179] a people as little to have been expected as any in the Highlands. He keeps an open table by which means he is become very popular, and I believe, generally speaking, has more to say than any in that Country. L[ochie]l is still here expecting every day Lord T[ra]q[uai]rs arrival etc. His Lordship, to the best of my Remmembrance, came to Scotland sometime in the moneth when L[ochie]l and I immediately mett with him. He acquainted us that Mr. Drummond had left London a great while before him and promised so soon as he gott to Paris that the King of France and his ministers should be acquainted with the favourable accounts he had to give of his Success and that he would forthwith inform Lord T[ra]q[uai]r of every Resolution that was taken. His Lordship likewise told us what had passed during[Pg 47] his Stay at London, which I shall not pretend to give a particular detail of, having no authority to intermeddle with, nor ever had, any particular concern in what regarded the English; so shall leave it to his Lordship to give a particular account of his Negotiations in that Country, if he shall think it necessary. I shall only mention here that his Lordship informed us that he had talk’d with the principal people of the Tory party some of which were very timerous, others such as Lord Bar[rymo]re very ready to join in any thing that could conduce to forward the Restoration, and that he had frankly offered, when they proposed a sum of Money to be ready to the Value of £12,000 which was scrupled at by some, to provide it himself. That Lord O[rre]ry[180] I had made two several apointments with him and Mr. Drummond, neither of which he keept, but Stept out of Town without Seeing of them. But I must observe that from all I can Remmember of the Story no particular Concert was formed nor was their any appearance given the french of meeting with provisions, Carriages and horses att their landing, as Mr. Amalet proposed at Versails; for to the contrary when         was spoke to who lived in the neighbourhood of where they proposed to land, concerning the providing of these several Necessary he said he had no Idea that any thing had been so suddenly designed for the King, so could make no promises. Mr. Butler, the Gentleman sent over by the King of France to enquire into the Situation of the Country, was introduced by his Lordship to the most of the people. He knew and was sent to the Country to a meeting at Litchfield Races there to meet with Lord B[arrymor]e, Sir W[atkin Williams] W[ynn][181] where he was with about 80 or more gentlemen all of them but one reckoned honest people, which to be sure gave a good aspect to the party in general; but nevertheless I don’t see he went away with such a[Pg 48] satisfactory account as Mr. Amalet seemed to require. He assured my Lord he had several Instructions from the King himself, but I wish his principall Errand may not have been to purchase horses with a View to the Kings equipage for the insuing Campaign, he having bought to the value of 3 or 4000£. This reflection may seem harsh but I cannot reconcile their bestowing that sum upon horses for which he said they had no Occasion only by a way of blind and not allowing the prince not above one half of it for a whole years expences, and I don’t think it would be just to argue in opposition to it that they then knew nothing of the Campaign his Majesty intended to make. The french are rather too far sighted not to allow them to design so short a while as some moneths before hand. In short from his Lordships return till the moneth of february we had no Letters from france. In the interim L[ochie]l went to the Highlands when he acquainted Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] and Lord L[ova]t with all yt had passed and that we soon expected the french would come to a final determination one or tother. We spent the time greatly shagerin’d, vex’d to have no Accounts of any kind considering that Mr. Drummond promised at his leaving London in Company with Mr. Butler to write over immediately. Att last we received two letters, one inclosing another Copy, of which I shall insert Copy of Mr. Drummonds Letter to the Earl of T[ra]q[uai]r, dated ...

Sir,[178]—I had the pleasure of writing to you on the fifth of [Pg 46] last month with one enclosed to his Majesty, which makes me take the trouble to inform you that upon L[ochie]l's repeated letters to Lord L[ovat] along with copies of my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r's messages from London that I sent him, he has decided not to leave home this winter. I would be greatly remiss if I didn’t inform you that his Lordship has worked tirelessly this summer to promote his Majesty's interests in his district, so I have every reason to believe that he is confident in those he has secured support from. He seems to be in great spirits about his success during his recent travels across the country when he won over most of the Monroes, [179] a group that was not expected to support him at all in the Highlands. He keeps an open table, which has made him very popular, and generally speaking, he has more influence than anyone else in that area. L[ochie]l is still here, waiting for Lord T[ra]q[uai]r's arrival, etc. His Lordship, as far as I remember, arrived in Scotland sometime last month when L[ochie]l and I immediately met with him. He informed us that Mr. Drummond had left London long before him and promised that as soon as he got to Paris, the King of France and his ministers would be made aware of the favorable news he had regarding his success, and that he would quickly inform Lord T[ra]q[uai]r of every decision made. His Lordship also told us about what transpired during [Pg 47] his stay in London, which I won’t go into detail about, as I have no authority to interfere with, nor have I ever had, any specific involvement regarding the English; so I will leave it to his Lordship to provide a detailed account of his dealings in that country if he thinks it necessary. I will only mention here that his Lordship told us he had spoken with the key figures of the Tory party, some of whom were quite hesitant, while others, like Lord Bar[rymo]re, were eager to join in anything that could help promote the Restoration, and he had openly offered, when they suggested a sum of money to be prepared in the amount of £12,000—which some hesitated at—he would provide it himself. That Lord O[rre]ry [180] I had made two separate appointments with him and Mr. Drummond, neither of which he kept, but slipped out of town without seeing them. However, I must note that from all I can remember about the situation, no specific plan was made, nor was there any indication given to the French about meeting with supplies, carriages, and horses upon their landing, as Mr. Amalet had suggested at Versailles; because, conversely, when someone was asked who lived near the area where they planned to land about providing these various necessities, he stated he had no idea anything had been so quickly organized for the King, so he couldn’t make any promises. Mr. Butler, the gentleman sent by the King of France to investigate the situation in the country, was introduced by his Lordship to most of the local leaders. He was sent to the country for a meeting at Litchfield Races to meet with Lord B[arrymor]e, Sir W[atkin Williams] W[ynn] [181] where he was with about 80 or more gentlemen, all considered honest except for one, which certainly gave a good impression of the party overall; but still, I don’t see that he left with the kind of satisfactory reports Mr. Amalet seemed to be asking for. He assured my Lord he had several instructions from the King himself, but I worry that his main reason for being there may have been to purchase horses for the King's preparations for the upcoming campaign, having bought to the value of £3,000 or £4,000. This thought may seem harsh, but I can't justify them spending that amount on horses when he claimed they had no use for them, instead of allowing the prince just half of that for a whole year's expenses, and I don’t think it would be fair to argue against that point by saying they were unaware of the campaign His Majesty planned to undertake. The French are generally too far-sighted to limit their plans to just a few months beforehand. In short, from his Lordship’s return until February, we had no letters from France. In the meantime, L[ochie]l went to the Highlands where he informed Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] and Lord L[ovat] of everything that had happened and that we soon expected the French would come to a final decision one way or the other. We spent the time quite frustrated, as we had no news of any kind, considering that Mr. Drummond promised, upon his departure from London in the company of Mr. Butler, to write immediately. At last, we received two letters, one enclosing another copy, of which I will include Mr. Drummond's letter to the Earl of T[ra]q[uai]r, dated ...

** ** *

** ** *

After I had made this answer with the Consent and advice of the Duke of P[erth] and was signed by them, the nixt day being Ash Wedensday[182] his Grace resolved to leave the place being apprehensive that as the newspapers were there very full of the french preparations he might be suspected and seized and so not in his power to appear when any thing came to be done. My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r, att whose Lodgings I had the Honour to meet his Grace that mourning, was very much against[Pg 49] his leaving the place in such a hurry, and on that day especially. I likewise took the Liberty to remonstrate to him a little against it but all to no purpose and he accordingly sett out about Eleven O Clock and went that night the Length of Dumblain. This was immediately looked upon by the people of the Government with a very jealous Eye and the more so that his Brother Lord J[oh]n had come to Scotland some little time before upon a Scheme of raising a Scots Regiment for the french Service, stayed only ten days or little more at Edinburgh and went from that to the Highlands to solicite the Gentlemen there to be assisting to him in making his Levies. It unluckily hapened for the Duke that upon the back of Lord J[oh]ns going to the Country the Government began to be alarmed with the Accounts of the Princes being come to france and the intended invasion in his Majestys interest which made our little Ministers conjecture that Lord J[oh]n had been sent over with the accounts of it to the Highlands and consequently that the Duke had left the town with an intention to foment an insurrection in the Country. This was made no secret of, being publickly talked of immediately upon the Duke disappearing two days, so after his leaving the town a servant of his was dispatched to London with the Letter I had wrote to Mr. Drummond their being no other means of conveiying one to him but by express, we not having any settled Cannal of Correspondence from hence there. This I think was about the 8th or 10th of february [1744]. My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r stayed some days in town after, designedly to create no suspicion.

After I gave this answer with the consent and advice of the Duke of Perth and it was signed by them, the next day, Ash Wednesday, his Grace decided to leave the place because he was worried that, since the newspapers were full of news about the French preparations, he might be suspected and seized, making it impossible for him to be present when anything needed to be done. My Lord Traquair, at whose lodgings I had the honor of meeting his grace that morning, strongly opposed his leaving in such a hurry, especially that day. I also took the liberty to express my objections to him, but it was all in vain, and he set out around eleven o'clock, traveling that night as far as Dumblain. The people in the government viewed this suspiciously, especially since his brother, Lord John, had come to Scotland a little earlier with a plan to raise a Scottish regiment for the French service, staying only ten days or so in Edinburgh before heading to the Highlands to seek support from the gentlemen there for his recruitment. Unfortunately for the Duke, just after Lord John went to the country, the government began to get alarmed by reports of the prince arriving in France and the planned invasion in his Majesty’s interest, which made our little ministers suspect that Lord John had been sent to the Highlands with news of it, and consequently, that the Duke had left town intending to stir up an insurrection in the country. This was no secret and was publicly discussed right after the Duke disappeared for two days. So, after he left town, one of his servants was dispatched to London with the letter I had written to Mr. Drummond, as there was no other way to convey it to him except by express, since we didn't have a regular means of correspondence from here to there. I think this was around the 8th or 10th of February 1744. My Lord Traquair stayed in town for a few days afterward, intentionally to avoid raising any suspicion.

In about a week or so after I went on a Sunday Evening to see Mr. H[a]y[183][184] who, when I was talking in a ludicrous way[Pg 50] of the paragraph in the papers about the manner in which his Highness had left Italy, he told me in a very serious way that it was no Joke and said that the sooner I went to the Country the better as my living quietly at home would give no suspicion to the Government, but if I stayed any time in town he did not know what might happen, that upon his honour he had not heard me mentioned, which perhaps was owing to my near Relation with him, but that att that same time I was suspected to correspond with Rome. I told him I intended to stay some days longer in Town and would so soon as I had formerly proposed, that I had no cause of fear and so would not run away, and as to their suspecting my corresponding with Rome, that I laughed at but thanked him for his kind concern. I was not at all sorry to find they were so alarmed and afraid, which to me appeared a sure sign of their weakness, and indeed their fear for some days after increased to the most abject pusilanimity. His saying that he had not heard me mentioned was telling plainly that they had been consulting of who were the persons first to be laid hands; and I am apt to believe had the management of affairs been left to Lord Arniston,[185] Sir John Inglis,[186] Commissioner Arthburthnet[187] and the rest of the present Ministry there would have been little lenity shown any Body they had the least reason to suspect. But affairs were afterwards taken out of their hands and putt into these of Justice Clerks,[188] who tho’ as Violent a Whig yet not so hott and Violent a Man. I went next day, being Munday, in the morning to wait of General[Pg 51] Guest, who then Commanded in Chief in Scotland[189] with a View to hear what a Notion or Idea he had of matters. He told me that the Repeal of the Habeas Corpus Act was expected that night by the Post, but added that, was it come, upon his honour he did not know a man he suspected enough to lay up, which I was exceedingly well pleased with. Also att the same time I could have marked out a great many and the general seemed not in the least to be affraid and laughed att the hurry and confusion the other folks were. I was taken very ill that day after dinner and gave up thoughts of going to Mr. Hunters of Poolmood’s Burrial[190] which was to be on the Thursday, and I was desired out by the Widow on the tuesday, which evening about six O Clock Mr. Mc[Douga]ll[191] brought me a Letter directed to the Countess of T[ra]q[uai]r. As I was then expecting one every day from Mr. Drummond, as he had promised in his last, I began to suspect a little notwithstanding it had come by the Common Post, a very odd method of Conveyance. In such a critical juncture I opened it when I found a blank Cover and Still directed as before. This confirmed me in my suspicion and under that I found a Letter for my Lord which I immediately opened and tho’ partly in Cypher, could easily understand that things were directly to be putt in execution. This struck me a good deal as I said I would not go to the Country. However, I sent Mr. Mc[Douga]ll with directions immediately to sent the Letter off to Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and to desire D. C[     ]n[192] to come down as of no design and tell me I might go to the Country next[Pg 52] day if I pleased, which he accordingly did and hyrred a Chaise, not being able to ride. In the mean while Sir J. S[tewar]t came to see me, who I acquainted of it and att the same time wrote a Letter to Lord K[enmu]re who I had spoke to the Munday before, desiring him to meet me at T[ra]q[uai]r the thursday night as likewise one to Mr. J[oh]n Mc[leo]d[193] telling him I thought it would be fitt to send Sir J[ames] C[ampbe]lls son to the Highlands, who his father designed should serve him therein being assistant to raise the Country. I accordingly sett out next mourning for the Country and the day following Lord T[ra]q[uai]r mett me at Polmood and shewed me the Letter when decyphered which I shall here give a Copy off, and att the same time a Letter he had received the night before by express from Edinburgh telling him that their was a Warrant out to apprehend him which determined his Lordship to go immediately to the D[uke] of P[erth]. Upon which so soon as the Burrial was over we came to my house, where I wrote a Letter to Lord K[enmu]re desiring he would follow us next mourning to Hartrie[194] where we intended to sleep that night and sent it Express to T[ra]q[uai]r with other Letters of my Lords, expecting Lord K[enmo]re would be there that night, but he nevertheless continued the whole time in Edinburgh. We set out next day from Hartrie which was the fryday, that the french fleet was dispersed and the Transports run a Shore,[195] and the night after gott to Drummond Castle, from whence his Grace sent immediately an express with the Copy of the last Letter we received to L[ochie]l. We continued som weeks there always in Expectation to hear of a landing and in the mean time heard that several informations was given in against the Duke of Perth as having numbers of armed men about his house which was[Pg 53] absolutely false. At last a party of 150 foot and 30 Horse were sent from Stirling to make him Prisoner, but he had intelligence of it and went out of the way.[196] All this time Lord T[ra]q[uai]r was sculking about the Country having returned from the jaunt he had made over the Highlands.

About a week after I went to visit Mr. H[a]y[183][184] on a Sunday evening, during our conversation about the ridiculous article in the papers concerning how his Highness had left Italy, he seriously advised me that it was no joke. He said it would be best if I went to the countryside soon because staying quietly at home would raise no suspicions with the Government. However, if I spent much time in town, he didn't know what might happen to me. He swore that he hadn't heard my name mentioned, likely due to my close relation to him, but simultaneously said there were suspicions of me corresponding with Rome. I told him I planned to stay in town for a few more days as I previously intended, that I wasn't afraid and wouldn't run away, and that I found it amusing they suspected I was corresponding with Rome but appreciated his concern. I was actually pleased to see them so alarmed, which seemed to indicate their weakness, and their fear only grew over the next few days to utter cowardice. His comment about not hearing my name showed clearly that they were discussing who should be taken first, and I believed that if Lord Arniston, Sir John Inglis, Commissioner Arthburthnet, and the rest of the current Ministry had been in control, they would have shown no mercy to anyone they suspected. However, the situation was later taken out of their hands and given to the Justice Clerks,[188] who, although as much a Whig as the other men, were not quite as hot-headed. The next day, which was Monday morning, I went to see General[Pg 51] Guest, who was then in command in Scotland, to gauge his thoughts on the situation. He told me that the repeal of the Habeas Corpus Act was expected that night by post but added that, even if it arrived, he didn't think there was a man he suspected enough to lock up, which pleased me greatly. At that moment, I could have pointed out many suspects, and the general seemed completely unafraid, laughing at the panic and chaos of others. That day after lunch, I fell ill and decided not to go to Mr. Hunter’s burial at Poolmood[190] scheduled for Thursday. The widow had asked me to come on Tuesday evening around six o'clock, when Mr. Mc[Douga]ll[191] brought me a letter addressed to the Countess of T[ra]q[uai]r. Since I was expecting a letter from Mr. Drummond daily, as he had promised in his last letter, I became slightly suspicious, even though it came by standard post, which seemed an odd way to send it. In such a crucial moment, I opened it to find a blank cover still addressed as before. This confirmed my suspicion, and under that, I found a letter for my Lord, which I opened immediately. Although it was partly in code, I could easily tell that actions were about to be taken. This struck me, especially since I had said I wouldn't go to the countryside. However, I sent Mr. Mc[Douga]ll with instructions to send the letter promptly to Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and to ask D. C[     ]n[192] to come down without raising suspicion and tell me I could go to the countryside the next day if I wanted, which he did and arranged for a carriage since I couldn't ride. Meanwhile, Sir J. S[tewar]t came to visit me, and I informed him about the situation. I also wrote a letter to Lord K[enmu]re, with whom I had spoken the previous Monday, asking him to meet me at T[ra]q[uai]r on Thursday night, as well as one to Mr. J[oh]n Mc[leo]d[193] suggesting it would be fitting to send Sir J[ames] C[ampbe]ll's son to the Highlands since his father intended for him to help raise the area. I then set out the next morning for the countryside, and the following day, Lord T[ra]q[uai]r met me at Polmood and showed me the deciphered letter, which I will copy here. At the same time, he had received a letter the night before by express from Edinburgh informing him that there was a warrant out for his arrest, which prompted his Lordship to go to the D[uke] of P[erth]. As soon as the burial was over, we went to my house, where I wrote a letter to Lord K[enmu]re asking him to follow us the next morning to Hartrie[194] where we intended to stay that night, and sent it express to T[ra]q[uai]r along with other letters from my Lord, expecting Lord K[enmu]re to be there that night, but he remained in Edinburgh the entire time. We left from Hartrie the next day, which was Friday, just as the French fleet was being dispersed and the transports ran ashore,[195] and the night after, we arrived at Drummond Castle, from where his Grace immediately sent an express with copies of the last letter we received to L[ochie]l. We stayed there for a few weeks, always expecting to hear about a landing, while also learning that several reports were made against the Duke of Perth for allegedly having large numbers of armed men around his house, which was totally false. Eventually, a party of 150 foot and 30 horse was sent from Stirling to capture him, but he caught wind of it and went into hiding.[196] During all this time, Lord T[ra]q[uai]r was lurking around the countryside after returning from his trip over the Highlands.

After staying in that Country till the beginning of Aprile, without receiving any Accounts from abroad and giving up all hopes of a Landing, I left my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r there and came to Stirlingshire where I stayed about three weeks and so came to Edinburgh, and from that went to the Country the 11th of May. In the beginning of June, when Lord T[ra]q[uai]r returned, I went to wait of him, and being very uneasy to think we had received no accounts from Abroad, I said if I could afford the expence I would go over on pretence of seeing the Army in flanders and so see the Prince myself and learn distinctly what situation things were in. This his Lordship was well pleased with but I did not say anything positively, but upon Reflexion by the Road, I thought it was hard that people who had been for so long concerned in the Kings affairs and putt to so great Charge about it with the hazard of their Lives and fortunes should now be left in the dark as to every thing. Wherefore I resolved to do it, and next day wrote a Letter to my Lord telling him that if the Duke of P[erth] would give me a 100£ I would be att the rest of the expence myself and go over and in case his Lordship approved of it, he would be so good as meet me at Peebles on Saturday, which he did, and after talking with him I came home and sett out the same night about     O Clock and gott to Drummond [Castle] next afternoon. The Duke immediately agreed to the thing and gave me an order for the money. About this time came a letter from Lord Semple to Lord T[ra]q[uai]r by way of an account of their precedure in the Spring, which I went to T[ra]q[uai]r and assisted his[Pg 54] Lordship to decypher, but was so little to our satisfaction that my Lord still thought my going over more necessary than before. About this time I received a letter from St[uar]t of Ard[shie]ll,[197] telling me that he would have come to the Country to wait of me but his dress made him remarkable, being in Highland Cloaths, but as he had comed to Town purposely to meet with me, he hoped I would give him a meeting, and yt he had seen L[ochie]l lately. I went to town in a day or two after and dined with him. His Errand was to know of me if I had gott any Accounts lately, and what hopes I had. I did not think it att all proper to let him know any thing of my having seen such a letter as Lord Semple had wrote, nor indeed that any Accounts had come; for in that case he would have expected something positive. But I put him off by telling him I imagined the french were resolved to renew the Expedition soon and so friends did not care to write least any discovery should ensue, but could easily see that the Answer was not att all satisfactory. I returned that same night to the Country, and during a few days that I stayed, prepared for my journey.

After staying in that country until the beginning of April, without receiving any news from abroad and giving up all hope of a landing, I left my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r there and went to Stirlingshire, where I stayed for about three weeks. Then, I traveled to Edinburgh, and from there went to the countryside on the 11th of May. At the beginning of June, when Lord T[ra]q[uai]r returned, I went to meet him. I felt very uneasy about the lack of updates from abroad, so I mentioned that if I could afford the cost, I would go over there, pretending to visit the army in Flanders, just to see the Prince myself and find out exactly what the situation was. His Lordship was pleased with this idea, but I didn't commit to anything right away. However, while reflecting on the way, I thought it was unfair that people who had been so heavily involved in the King's affairs and had spent so much, risking their lives and fortunes, should now be left in the dark about everything. So, I decided to go for it. The next day, I wrote a letter to my Lord, telling him that if the Duke of P[erth] would give me £100, I would cover the rest of the expenses myself and go over. I asked that, if he approved, he would kindly meet me at Peebles on Saturday, which he did. After discussing it with him, I returned home and set off that same night at around 12 o'clock, arriving at Drummond [Castle] the next afternoon. The Duke immediately agreed to the plan and gave me an order for the money. Around this time, a letter came from Lord Semple to Lord T[ra]q[uai]r detailing their activities in the spring. I went to T[ra]q[uai]r to help his Lordship decipher it, but it was so unsatisfactory that my Lord thought my trip was even more necessary than before. During this time, I received a letter from St[uar]t of Ard[shie]ll, telling me that he would have come to the country to see me, but his outfit made him stand out since he was in Highland clothes. However, since he had come to town specifically to meet me, he hoped I would agree to see him, and that he had seen L[ochie]l recently. I went to town a couple of days later and had dinner with him. His purpose was to ask if I had received any news lately and what hopes I had. I didn't think it was appropriate to let him know that I had seen Lord Semple's letter, or that any news had come in; otherwise, he would have expected something concrete. So, I deflected by telling him I imagined the French were planning to renew the expedition soon, and that's why friends weren't keen to write, fearing any discovery might result, but it was clear that the response was not satisfactory at all. That night, I returned to the countryside, and during the few days I stayed, I prepared for my journey.

N.B.—This is a fragment of a letter written by Mr. Murray to the Pretender soon after the miscarriage of the French Expedition.

N.B.—This is a part of a letter that Mr. Murray wrote to the Pretender shortly after the failure of the French Expedition.

Murray to the Chevalier

It was looked upon by some as certain, and thought necessary by all, that Mr. Watson[198] should come over, as he was the person who had gone through the whole Highlands and gott the engagements of the Several Gentlemen at his first leaving Scotland, and surely had any of them been so little as to flinch from what they engaged to him, he was the natural and indeed the only person that could have upbraided them into their Duty. My Lord says he could trust to no conveyance, and so could[Pg 55] not soonner give us any information your Majestys friend is here, upon Mr. D[rummond] not coming, expected immediately after the Embargo was taken of in france that some one or other would have been dispatched to our Coasts with an account of what had passed, and what was to be hoped for, that so we might have regulate our fortunes Conduct accordingly. The neglect of this, Sir, greatly surprises your Majestys friends in generall, and gives the Gentlemen in the concert a good deal of Umbrage, as they thereby think themselves slighted and neglected, whereas, they being the first promoters of the whole scheme, they humbly think entitled them to have the most expidetious information. His Lordship next supposes that we are fully satisfied of the french sincerity, which indeed is entirely otherwise, especially from the Reasons he assigns that it was owing to the commandants neglect or disobedience to his Instructions. We never can bring ourselves to believe that any man (especially a french subject) grown old with an untainted and great Reputation, durst have disobeyed what seems to have been the only Material part of his Instructions to block up Portsmouth, and surely, if not for this one Errand his Voyage to the Chunnel must rather do harm than good, which was evidently seen by the Government being put timeously upon their Guard. As to his next paragraph relating to the frenches cautious delay purposely to see what Influence the powers of the Court would have upon your Majestys friends here, and that the above cautious delay was grating to the Prince; no wonder indeed his Royal Highness had too penetrating an Eye not to see that it would be impossible to recover this Time and opportunity he was losing. But what really quite astonishes us is his Lordships saying that from the light it was represented in, their caution seemed to be well grounded. We cant pretend to take their Reasons to [heart] as they are not told us, but we are affraid they consist more in plausible pretences, dressed up with a little french Rhetorick, than in strong and solid Arguments. We are in this Climate generally accustomed to the plainer sort[Pg 56] of speach, and we cannot help thinking ourselves judges of it. Did not the french Court know of Comns.?[199] Did they not know that that Majority would pass all Bills that might seem their Master? Did they not know that the repeal of the Habeas Corpus act would naturally be the first step and that by that Repeal they were enabled to take up every person they suspected? Did they not know that the principal men in England, of your Majestys friends, were in the house and that not one of them durst object to any method that was proposed as their offering. Such would have been an open declaration of their principles, and must consequently have caused their confinement. Did they not know that the English are a fickle sort of people, and that they had a natural abhorence of the french nation, and thay could not be ignorant that this was giving them time to frighten them by the fear of a french Influence that State pretence and thereby to make friends in the City of London. If they were Ignorant of all these they ought surely to have been told, and we must be of opinion that these as such Indisputable Reasons that no Sound Arguments could be adduced to confute them, which, when rightly observed, makes their Schemes of delaying it for a little time appear vain and frivolous pretences and absolutely contradictory to all Right Reason. We are convinced that his Royal Highness, keeping so quiet has effectually deceived the Government, that it is entirely owing to his own matchless address, and indeed upon decyphering the Letter My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and I thought that we was in the next line to have had orders to keep in readyness to favour a discent to be made, upon the D[uke] of H[amilton] and the Dutch troops going over; but to our unexpressible Surprise he proposes new assurances to be given both from Scotland and England. In the name of Wonder what can all this mean? Where are the Grounds? Where the Reasons, where the necessity leading to such a demand? The assurances from Scotland were thought sufficient by the[Pg 57] K[ing], by C[ardinal] F[leury] and by Mr. Amalot. From the first moment the assurances carried over by Mr. Butler last year from England were thought sufficient, otherwise the french would not have carried the Expidition so far. If this is the case (which we have all along been made believe) what is the necessity for any Renewal of them? What a horrid and Gloomy prospect must such a Scheme carry along with it, things have been carried on for some years with great Secrecy and caution, tho’ with danger of Life and fortune to those concerned, and must they now recommence such another tedious and dangerous Negotiation? I am afraid, Sir, if your Majesty should find it necessary it will be next to impossible, at lest my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r never can take a hand doing any thing in England, he is already strongly suspected and it wanted but little he was not taken up some moneths ago. The express he sent to London with a Letter to Watson[200] was seized, which was occasioned by one from him which left us quite in the dark as to what assistance we were to have, and that within 3 weeks of the Expidition, but not till he had delivered his Packet; and had he not luckyly said he believed it Related to a marriage which was then the talk of the town, his Lordship had surely been arested. But if the English are so well satisfied with the procedure of the french, and the open discovery of any plot, why cant they find one amongst themselves to do the Business? I shall be sorry to think they have only a view to gain time till they see whither they are able to carry on the War in spite of Brittain, and then tell us that the Zeal shown for the present Government in the time of the Expidition contradicts all the assurances we advanced to the contrary, which will be the Result of their Cautious and well delay for a little time. This is harsh, but other people have seen, and I have read of france doing the like in other cases. As to the troops to be landed in Scotland, suppose it to be impossible to converse with all the concert on it att any time in two moneths, and all[Pg 58] present not to be done at all, yett I can take upon me to affirm that they still continue in the same mind as to every Article. 3000 men landed, one half near Sir J[ames] Cam[pbe]ll to command Argyle Shire, the other half near Inverness, a L[ochie]l may join them to command the north, or if the one half can’t reach near to Sir J[ames] C[ampbell], lett them be all landed together with 4 feild pieces, 15 or 20,000 Stand of Arms, Gones, Pistoles and broad Swords, yett from the inquiry I have made I am satisfied 10,000 Guns or less, 10,000 Broad Swords and as many Pistoles will sufficiently do the Business, as all the Isles are lately Armed with Guns and most of them Swords, Likewise, as for the Inland Country, they want Swords and Pistoles very much. It gives us great uneasiness that my Lord M[arischal] should be so unhappy as to fly in the face of every Scheme, if he himself does not project. Sed quos Deus vult perdere dementit prius, but we cannot help thinking oddnt, when the money was had to pay Sir J[ames] Mr. Watson did not care to remit it. This to be sure required no Conveyance, a Bill was sufficient. He knows the miserable Situation he is in, and tho’ the rest of the Concert are in no such Indigent Situation, yett their Circumstances are not so opulent as to assist him. The Gentlemen in the Highlands were so desirous to know if any accounts were come that Locheal gave a Commission to St[ewart] of A[rdshiel] who came expressly to meet with me and indeed I was so Anxious for the Situation of your Majestys friends, that I resolved upon a journey abroad to inform myself of every thing, upon the pretence of going to see the Army to some who had a title to be a little more Curious upon pretence of making more interest for a Company in the Dutch in case of any new levies, so that it was an accident I either mett with that Gentleman or saw my Lord S[emple] letter. He complained heavily that we had no Accounts from abroad, and indeed I never had more difficulty to excuse our friends. However, I told that our having none looked well as it portended that the expidition had surely suffered some short delay from the bad weather that had happened[Pg 59] at the time, and as it was soon to be resumed, they thought it needless to send us any information in case of discoveries, which nevertheless cou’d observe did not entirely Satisfie him. My Lord T[raquair] desired me to assure your Majesty that there is nothing he would not undertake which might      further your Majestys interest but that he cannot come from his own house to Edinburgh without being suspected, which renders it impossible for him to negotiate any thing in England, and at the same time desires me to observe that he cannot reconceal that part of my Lord S[emple’s] Letter, where he tells him that nothing will be fixed with relation to the expidition till he hear from him with his proposals of fresh assurances from your Majestys friends here. In short, Sir, I must say that this letter is of such a nature that I do not take it upon me to intimate it to the Gentlemen in the Concert as in the present Situation Your Majestys Wisdom, the inexpressible Character the Prince has acquired as being of so brave and enterprising a Spirit, together with their own Suspence and hopes are what keep up their Spirits, but was I to make it knowen to them I am afraid it would throw them into a fatal Despondency, so till I have your Majestys orders am resolved to keep it private. Never was there a people more anxiously concerned about a princes happiness and welfare than this nation when she heard of Highness imbarkation, nor do I believe Scotland ever made a more unanimous Appearance than they would have done then, provided the Conditions promised them had been performed, but we have been told here, how justly I won’t say, that there was only 3000 Muskets designed for us without any troops, indeed, we are able, at any time, to command our own Country with Arms and officers, especially now when there is only four Regiments of foot and two of Dragoons, and each of these 100 Men draughted to flanders. I am sorry to be obliged to trouble your Majesty with so long a paper, but I am hopefull your Majesty will be of opinion our present Situation required it especially after receiving the inclosed, nor do I fear your Majestys being angry[Pg 60] upon that account as I most humbly beg leave to say that an honest and loyal Subject can never explain himself too fully and Clearly to a wise Prince, and since the Receipt of Lord S[emple] letter I am more fully resolved to make my journey abroad as I think there is more Reason for full and pointed explications on every Article, and if I don’t thereby hurt your Majestys affairs of what at present I have no idea I shall be quite indifferent as what may be the consequence with regard to myself, being Void of all other Views but that of promoting your Majestys Interest, which I shall ever endeavour to do att all hazard. I most humbly beg this letter may not be made known to my Lord S[emple] and Mr. W[atson][201] least it unreasonably make differences amongst those concerned in your Majestys affairs, but if sending them a Copy will in your Majestys opinion be of any Service, I can with great Satisfaction sacrifice the private Regard of any man to the trueth and to my King and Country.

It was considered certain by some and necessary by all that Mr. Watson[198] should come over since he was the one who had traveled through the Highlands and secured the commitments of the various gentlemen when he first left Scotland. If any of them had shown even the slightest hesitation in fulfilling their promises to him, he was the natural and indeed the only person who could have reminded them of their duty. My Lord says he couldn’t trust any kind of communication, and therefore he could not provide us with immediate information about your Majesty's friend being here. After Mr. D[rummond] didn’t come, we expected that someone would be sent to our coasts with news of what had happened and what we could hope for, so we could adjust our plans accordingly. The lack of this communication, Sir, greatly surprises your Majesty’s friends in general and causes some annoyance for the gentlemen involved in the planning, as they feel slighted and overlooked. They believe, being the original promoters of the entire scheme, that they deserve the quickest information available. His Lordship then assumes that we are fully convinced of the French’s sincerity, which is completely untrue, especially considering his reasons, which state that it was due to the commandant's negligence or disobedience to his instructions. We can’t bring ourselves to believe that any man (especially a Frenchman) with a long-standing and unblemished reputation would dare to disobey what seems to have been the most crucial part of his orders—blocking Portsmouth. Surely, if not for this one responsibility, his voyage to the Chunnel would have done more harm than good, as was clearly seen when the government was put on high alert. Regarding his next point about the French’s cautious delay to see what influence the Court could have on your Majesty's friends here, and that this cautious delay was annoying to the Prince; it’s no surprise that His Royal Highness, being so perceptive, recognized that it would be impossible to regain the time and opportunity he was losing. However, what truly astonishes us is his Lordship’s claim that their caution seemed well-founded based on how it was presented. We can’t pretend to take their reasons to heart as we have not been told them, but we fear they consist more of plausible excuses wrapped in a bit of French rhetoric than solid, strong arguments. We are used to more straightforward speech in this climate, and we can't help but consider ourselves fair judges of it. Did the French Court not know about Comns.?[199] Did they not realize that the majority would pass any bills favorable to their master? Did they not see that repealing the Habeas Corpus Act would naturally be the first step, allowing them to detain anyone they suspected? Were they unaware that the leading figures among your Majesty's friends in England were present in the house and that not one of them would dare object to any method that was proposed as their offering? Such objections would have directly revealed their principles and could have resulted in their confinement. Did they not know that the English are fickle and that they have a natural aversion to the French nation? They could not have been ignorant of the fact that this was effectively giving them time to intimidate them with the fear of French influence, therefore making allies in the City of London. If they were ignorant of all this, they surely should have been informed, and we believe these are undeniable reasons that no sound arguments could counter. Observing this clearly, their delay schemes appear empty and trivial, completely contradictory to common sense. We are convinced that His Royal Highness’s silence has effectively misled the government, and it is entirely due to his unmatched skill. Indeed, upon deciphering the letter, my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and I thought we were about to receive orders to stand ready to support a descent on the D[uke] of H[amilton] and the Dutch troops crossing, but to our utter surprise, he suggests new assurances should be provided from both Scotland and England. In the name of all that is wondrous, what could this mean? What are the grounds? What are the reasons? What necessity leads to such a demand? The assurances from Scotland were deemed sufficient by the[Pg 57] K[ing], by C[ardinal] F[leury], and by Mr. Amalot. From the very beginning, the assurances brought over by Mr. Butler last year from England were considered adequate; otherwise, the French would not have advanced the Expedition this far. If this is true (which we have been led to believe throughout), then what is the need for any renewal of them? What a dismal and grim prospect such a scheme presents! Things have been conducted for several years with great secrecy and caution, even with the dangers to life and fortune involved for those concerned. Must they now restart another tedious and perilous negotiation? I fear, Sir, if your Majesty should find it necessary, it will be almost impossible. At least my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r can never take action in England; he is already under strong suspicion and was very close to being arrested a few months ago. The messenger he sent to London with a letter for Watson[200] was seized due to one of his letters that left us completely in the dark regarding what assistance we could expect, and this occurred just three weeks before the Expedition, but only after he had delivered his packet. Had he not wisely mentioned that he thought it related to a marriage that was then the talk of the town, his Lordship would have surely been arrested. But if the English are so pleased with the actions of the French and any open revelation of a plot, why can’t they find one among themselves to handle the situation? I would be sorry to think they only intend to buy time until they see if they can carry on the war despite Britain, and then inform us that the support shown for the current government during the Expedition contradicts all the assurances we had advanced to the contrary. This would be the result of their cautious and well-calculated delay. This is harsh, but others have seen, and I have read about France doing the same thing in other matters. As for the troops to be landed in Scotland, suppose it’s impossible to coordinate with everyone involved at any time in two months, and not to do anything at all in the present, yet I can confidently assert that they continue to hold the same position on every point. 3,000 men would land, one half near Sir J[ames] Cam[pbe]ll to lead Argyle Shire, the other half near Inverness; a L[ochie]l may join them to command the north, or if one half can’t reach near Sir J[ames] C[ampbell], let them all land together with 4 field pieces, 15 or 20,000 stands of arms, guns, pistols, and broadswords. However, from the inquiries I've made, I am convinced that 10,000 guns or fewer, 10,000 broadswords, and as many pistols would suffice, as all the Isles have recently armed themselves with guns and most of them have swords. Moreover, as for the inland areas, they lack swords and pistols significantly. It greatly troubles us that my Lord M[arischal] should be so unfortunate as to oppose every scheme unless he proposes one himself. Sed quos Deus vult perdere, dementit prius, but we can’t help but find it strange that when the money was available to pay Sir J[ames], Mr. Watson did not wish to send it. This surely required no method of transportation; a bill would have sufficed. He knows the miserable situation he is in, and although the rest of the concert are not in such dire straits, their circumstances are not rich enough to assist him. The gentlemen in the Highlands were so eager to know if any news had arrived that Locheal commissioned St[ewart] of A[rdshiel] to come specifically to meet with me, and truly I was so anxious about the situation of your Majesty's friends that I decided to travel abroad to learn everything, under the pretense of wanting to see the Army to satisfy those who had reason to be a bit more curious and to perhaps generate more interest for a company in the Dutch in case of any new levies. Thus, it was merely by chance that I encountered that gentleman or saw my Lord S[emple]’s letter. He complained heavily that we had no news from abroad, and indeed I felt more difficulty in justifying our friends. However, I told him that our lack of news looked favorable as it suggested that the expedition had certainly suffered some minor delay due to the bad weather at the time, and since it would soon be resumed, they thought it pointless to send us any updates out of concern for discovery, though I observed this did not entirely satisfy him. My Lord T[raquair] asked me to assure your Majesty that there is nothing he would not undertake to further your Majesty’s interests, but he cannot travel from his own home to Edinburgh without being suspected, which makes it impossible for him to negotiate anything in England. He also urges me to point out that he cannot ignore that part of my Lord S[emple]’s letter, where it states that nothing concerning the expedition will be settled until he hears from him along with his proposals for fresh assurances from your Majesty's friends here. In short, Sir, I must say this letter is of such a nature that I do not dare to share it with the gentlemen in the concert. Given the current situation, your Majesty's wisdom, the incredible character the Prince has gained for being so brave and enterprising, combined with their own uncertainty and hopes, maintain their spirits. However, if I were to reveal this to them, I fear it would plunge them into a deep state of despair; therefore, until I receive orders from your Majesty, I am resolved to keep it private. Never have there been a people more anxiously concerned about a prince's happiness and well-being than this nation when they heard of His Highness’s embarkation, nor do I believe Scotland ever demonstrated a more unified display than they would have at that time, if only the promised conditions had been met. However, we have been told here—how justly I won’t say—that only 3,000 muskets were intended for us, without any troops. In fact, we can, at any time, command our own country with arms and officers, especially now when there are only four regiments of foot and two of dragoons, with each of these having 100 men drafted to Flanders. I regret having to trouble your Majesty with such a lengthy letter, but I hope your Majesty will agree that our current situation demands it, particularly after receiving the enclosure. Nor do I fear your Majesty being upset on that account, as I humbly beg to say that an honest and loyal subject can never explain himself too fully and clearly to a wise prince. Since receiving Lord S[emple]’s letter, I am more determined to make my journey abroad, as I believe there is a strong need for clear and pointed explanations on every point. If I do not thereby harm your Majesty’s affairs—which I currently cannot foresee—I shall be quite indifferent to whatever the outcome might be regarding myself, being devoid of any other intentions than to promote your Majesty’s interests, which I will always strive to do at all costs. I humbly ask that this letter not be disclosed to my Lord S[emple] and Mr. W[atson][201], lest it unreasonably create divisions among those involved in your Majesty’s affairs. However, if sending them a copy would, in your Majesty's opinion, be beneficial, I can with great satisfaction sacrifice the private regard of any man for the truth and for my King and Country.

This seems to be a Copy of a Letter which Mr. Murray wrote after his return from France and Flanders in the Moneths of September or October, 1744, To the young Pretender, then in France.[202]

This appears to be a copy of a letter that Mr. Murray wrote after he came back from France and Flanders in September or October 1744, addressed to the young Pretender, who was then in France.[202]

Murray to Prince Charles

Sir,—It gives me the most Concern I should have been so long in this Country without having it in my power to acquaint your Royal Highness with what has passed since I left France, except in the short Letter I was necessitate to write from London under Cover to Mr. Lumly or Maxwell.[203] I dont now remember whilst being then able to find no other conveyance and since my Arrival here, there has been no Occasion till the present tho’ I have laid myself out to find one, as I might not so distinctly as I incline, acquaint your Royal Highness of every thing by way of letter. I have taken the Liberty[Pg 61] to write in form of a journal with opinions of the several Persons I have had occasion to talk to.

Dude,—I’m very concerned that I’ve been in this country for so long without being able to inform your Royal Highness about what’s happened since I left France, except for the brief letter I had to write from London, which I sent under cover to Mr. Lumly or Maxwell.[203] I don’t remember now, since I was unable to find another way to send it, and since my arrival here, there hasn't been an opportunity until now, even though I’ve tried hard to find one, so I could clearly inform your Royal Highness about everything in writing. I took the liberty[Pg 61] of writing in the form of a journal, including my thoughts on the various people I’ve had the chance to speak with.

I sett out from Senlis[204] on Wednesday morning and on Thursday night came to Brussels. From thence I went next day to Termonde, where I mett with 636, 616, 1614, 12, 30, 1392,[205] who I spoke to as ordered by Mr. Burnet.[206] He seemed a little Timerous at first, but nevertheless promised to do all in his power with his Brother Officers, and to write Mr. Fisher[206] under the name of Burnet subscribing himself Cuming. On the Saturday I went to 425, 1876, 1614,[207] in Company with Mr. 434, 1054, 1730,[208] to whom I spoke all night and found him so frank as to give me his word of honour that he would come over immediately upon my writing to him that he would use his Interest with the 1495 of his 598, 1614,[209] and go to Charleroy and talk with Some of Coaliers[210] and promised likewise to Send me over a list of the recruiting officers for this year, with a mark to those that might be spoke to. From that came to Rotterdam on Saturday where he informed me that there was nothing easier than to gett Arms of all kinds by applying to any Jew att Amsterdam who would oblige himself upon a penalty to give any number att whatever port in Holland we desired, and that as this was done dayly, it would create no Suspicion. There mett with 1389, 1051, C13,[211] to whom I repeated what had passed from the time I left him, and delivered him two letters from Mr. Burnet[206] with which he seemed exceedingly well pleased. I had many conversations with him on these[Pg 62] Subjects, and upon the whole he was, and still is of Opinion that the English will not be brought to enter upon any Scheme without a foreign force, and that Mr. Burnet’s[212] coming to Scotland without their concurrence must be of the worse consequence, as from that quarter alone their did not appear the least probability of Success; for which reason, if the french do not putt in Execution the following Spring what they proposed the passed, he proposes as the dernier Resort to make an offer to the King of the Crown of Scotland upon the footing of the Antient Allience with France; but of this I shall say nothing, leaving to him to explain it himself, and as to raising a Sum of money is of Opinion it will be very difficult, if at all possible. On the friday Se-en night,[213] after leaving Senlis I arrived att London and nixt morning went to wait of Mr. Moore[214] but missed him, however in the evening I gott him at home but found him quite a different man from what I had left him, very reserved and did not offer to show me any letter he had received during my Absence tho’ Martin[215] informed me he had given him one the post before. I then talked to him a little different of the frenches intentions, at least for this Winter season, to which he answered he looked upon the King of France as a man of honour, and that to be sure he would not give Mr. Fisher[212] such promises if he did not seriously intend to serve him. I endeavoured to show him from the then Situation of the french officers that it was unreasonable to expect it, but all to no purpose. Then I told him that Mr. Fisher desired Letters so and so adressed should Morris,[216] this he said was not in his power for he did not know the person in the City forwarded them, but promised to speak with Martin, who was acquainted with, and usually carried his Letters, who was[Pg 63] acquainted with him. I nixt spoke to him of raising a Sum of money to purchase Arms as likewise a few thousand pounds for Mr. Burnets[217] Own Use who was much pinched by the small allowance he had from Mr. Adams.[218] He told me that was what he could say nothing off, but that he knew their had been a Sum remitted to him last Spring by the way of Amsterdam. I then asked him to suppose the case that the french would do nothing, whether he imagined Saville[219] would join heartily with Sanderson[220] to bring about 407. Smith;[221] to which he answered as before, about the money that he knew nothing about it and so would not give his Opinion. Upon which I enjoined him upon Mr. Burnets[217] Name to mention that to none but whom Mr. Bright[222] and he should agree upon his Coming to Town, and desired to know how soon he thought that should be, which he still answered as before. From all which I could plainly see he had gott his Lesson from the other side. What made this the more obvious to me, in talking of raising money to purchase Arms, I told him it would be absolutely necessary, for tho’ in Diepe[223] we had men and them very willing to fight, yet we had no money, and Arms for not above 7000 if so many; A number far inferior to what I had before told him would appear. Upon which he immediately indeavoured to catch me by saying he hoped I had got no bad news from Doit[224] to Occasion my Diminishing the number of Loyalists which obliged me to explain the matter by telling him that in 1829, 1274, 1381, 1721,[225] a Gentleman [whose] following consisted perhaps of 800 had not arms for above one half and so of the rest, by which means they all in general when spoke to, declared they were not Armed. This, he no doubt did with Intent to find me out in a Contradiction which he could not have failed to represent to his friends[Pg 64] on the other side by the first post, who would have made their own use of it with Mr. Burnet.[226] Two days after, I went again to wait of him and enquire if he had settled that Correspondence as Mr. Fisher[226] desired, when he told me with great indifference that he had never spoke of it, and that the packets were to be stoped going any Longer from Dover to Calais, so that their must be a new conveyance settled, but how that was to be done he did not know. I then left him, and wrote the Short Letter I before mentioned to Mr. Burnet.[226] Then sett out for Doit, and on tuesday the 2d of October met with 1443, 1721, 530, 1489, 699, 1051, 1798,[227] a young Gentleman of a very large fortune, who I acquainted in general with my having seen Mr. Fisher[226] and what he proposed, upon which he very frankly offered to raise a sum of Money provided the others who I told off were to be applyed he would agree to it and that he would stay some time longer than he proposed, having intended to go to London, and is now in this place but of Opinion that nothing can be done without either a foreign force or the concurrence of Sidley.[228] Upon tuesday the ninth of October, I sent an Express to Mr. Bright,[229] then at the Earl of Nidsdales, and upon thursday morning he came to my house where I acquainted him with everything I had done from my Arrival at London. He seemed very much concerned that so many years and so much money had been spent to no purpose, but as he was obliged to return early nixt morning would not give his Opinion of the present footing things were on till his return home. Upon the 16th, I went with an intention to see Sir 1293, 43C, 1055, 1744, 1045, 1948, 1679, 1778,[230] and inform him fully of Mr. Burnets[226] resolutions, but found he was in fife, and his family uncertain of his Return, so proceeded to Edinburgh from whence I wrote the 18th of October to Mr. Fergus,[231] begging he would meet me at Mr. Brights[229] house about[Pg 65] the 26th, and one inclosed to Mr. Dan,[232] desiring him to come immediately. I soon received a letter informing me that Mr. Dan was come, and desired to see me, but as at this time my wife was taken very ill, I sent a servant that same night to town desiring the favour of a visit from him in the Country, which he declined, thinking it would look too suspicious as I was so lately come home and he only two days in Town, so rather choose to delay it for som little time. I likewise received a letter from Mr. Fergus,[233] telling me he could not for some weeks see me. I was now become very uneasy to think I had been for above a moneth in the Country without being able to do any thing, when luckily, about the       of the moneth Mr. Bright[234] called on me in his very home and promised to be in town 3 or 4 days after, which determined me to go nixt day, and that night I mett with Mr. Bright (who had been called by express) and Mr. Dan, when I read them a journal of what had passed from my leaving Diepe the 7th of July, and acquainted them with Mr. Burnets[235] Resolutions in case the french failed him. They were both well pleased with the proposal of Sidly and Sanderson[236] acting in conjuncion, but Equally against Mr. Fisher’s[235] relying upon Sanderson alone. I nixt day gave Mr. Dan the Letter designed for Nicolson,[237] which he delivered to him, and made an apointment to meet with me the same night which he accordingly did; but as he had drunk a little too much we differred having any positive answer from him. I told Mr. Dan there was a necessity for the other Letters being delivered immediately and that I depended upon him to do it. Found, as he was then about getting his Charter from the Duke of Argyle, and had given that for the reason of his coming up, it was impossible for him to Return without giving Suspicion. I for the second time had the misfortune to miss Sir 1293, 43C, 1055, 1744, 1045, 948, 1679, 1778,[238] being gone to[Pg 66] his house in the West, nor have I yett been able to see him, as I have almost ever since been obliged to Stay in this place. I left town munday 12 and returned thursday the 15th, where Mr. Dan came to me before dinner and told me that young Kinny[239] desired to speak with me, so I agreed to meet him that Evening Att 4 o’Clock, where he informed me that Lord Semple[240] and Mr. Drummond had refused to do Business any longer, that they had sent John Drummond[241] to him att Dunkirk to acquaint him that I had made Mr. Burnet[242] believe they were not trusted by his friends, and that they had then a prospect on the Tapis but had given it up, and told him that I had[Pg 67] at the same time perswaded Mr. Fisher[243] to come ovir with the intent to make himself 1357[244] and leave his father att Harfleur,[245] which I take God to Witness I never since mentioned to him as indeed it is one of the things in the world most against my principles upon which alone I have always acted in Mr. Ellis’s[246] affairs. Kinnys opinion of them, together with what I told him, easily convinced him of the folly of their Story.

I set out from Senlis[204] on Wednesday morning and arrived in Brussels by Thursday night. The next day, I went to Termonde, where I met with 636, 616, 1614, 12, 30, 1392,[205] as instructed by Mr. Burnet.[206] He seemed a bit nervous at first but still promised to do everything he could with his fellow officers and to write to Mr. Fisher[206] under the name of Burnet, signing himself as Cuming. On Saturday, I visited 425, 1876, 1614,[207] accompanied by Mr. 434, 1054, 1730,[208] where we talked the whole night. He was straightforward and assured me he would come over as soon as I wrote to him, using his influence with the 1495 of his 598, 1614,[209] and he'd also go to Charleroy to speak with some of the Coaliers[210]. He also promised to send me a list of recruiting officers for this year, marking those I could speak to. I then went to Rotterdam on Saturday, where he informed me that getting arms of all kinds was easy by reaching out to any Jew in Amsterdam who would agree to supply any number at any port in Holland we wanted, and since this was done daily, it wouldn’t raise any suspicion. There, I met with 1389, 1051, C13,[211] to whom I recapped everything that had happened since I left him, and I delivered two letters from Mr. Burnet[206], which made him very pleased. We had many discussions on these[Pg 62] subjects, and overall, he believed the English would not commit to any scheme without foreign support. He felt that Mr. Burnet’s[212] arrival in Scotland without their involvement would have dire consequences, as there seemed to be no chance of success from that quarter. For this reason, if the French do not act on their plans this coming spring, he suggests as a last resort offering the crown of Scotland to the King based on the ancient alliance with France; but I will leave it for him to explain this. Regarding raising funds, he thinks it will be very difficult, if not impossible. On the Friday night after leaving Senlis, I arrived in London and the next morning intended to see Mr. Moore[214] but missed him. However, that evening I found him at home, but he seemed like a different person—very reserved and didn’t offer to show me any letters he received during my absence, although Martin[215] told me he had given him one the day before. I then discussed the French intentions for this winter season, to which he replied he viewed the King of France as a man of honor, and he believed he wouldn’t make Mr. Fisher[212] promises unless he genuinely intended to support him. I tried to explain that given the current situation of the French officers, it was unreasonable to expect that, but it was useless. Then I told him that Mr. Fisher wanted letters addressed to Morris,[216] but he said he couldn’t do that since he didn’t know who in the city sent them, but he promised to talk to Martin, who was familiar with him and usually handled his letters. Next, I spoke to him about raising money to buy arms, as well as a few thousand pounds for Mr. Burnet’s[217] personal use since he was struggling with the small allowance he had from Mr. Adams.[218] He told me he couldn’t comment on that, but he knew some money had been sent to him last spring via Amsterdam. I then asked him to consider the situation if the French did nothing; whether he thought Saville[219] would wholeheartedly join forces with Sanderson[220] to bring about 407. Smith;[221] to which he responded, as before, that he didn’t know anything about the money and wouldn’t give his opinion. I then insisted that in Mr. Burnet’s[217] name, he should mention this only to Mr. Bright[222] and him when he came to town, and asked when he thought that would happen, but he kept responding as before. From all this, I could clearly see he had learned his lines from the other side. What made this even more obvious was when I talked about raising money for arms. I told him it was absolutely necessary, because although we had men in Diepe[223] who were eager to fight, we had no funds and only a few arms—perhaps not over 7000, which was far less than I previously mentioned. He quickly tried to catch me by saying he hoped I hadn’t received any bad news from Doit[224] causing me to lower the number of loyalists, which made me clarify that in 1829, 1274, 1381, 1721,[225] a gentleman whose following was about 800 only had arms for half of them, and so the rest stated they were unarmed. He undoubtedly tried this to find a contradiction that he could report to his contacts[Pg 64] on the other side, who would have used it against Mr. Burnet.[226] Two days later, I waited for him again to see if he had arranged that correspondence as Mr. Fisher[226] requested, when he casually told me he hadn’t mentioned it, and that the packets were to be stopped from going any longer from Dover to Calais, meaning a new conveyance had to be established, but he didn’t know how that would happen. I then left him and wrote the short letter to Mr. Burnet I mentioned earlier.[226] Then I headed for Doit, and on Tuesday, October 2nd, I met with 1443, 1721, 530, 1489, 699, 1051, 1798,[227] a young gentleman with a considerable fortune, who I briefed about my meeting with Mr. Fisher[226] and what he proposed. He generously offered to raise some money, provided the others I mentioned were involved, and he would stay longer than planned, having originally intended to go to London. He is now at this place but believes nothing can be achieved without foreign intervention or Sidley’s cooperation.[228] On Tuesday, October 9th, I sent a message to Mr. Bright,[229] who was then at the Earl of Nidsdale’s, and on Thursday morning, he came to my home where I updated him on everything I had done since arriving in London. He appeared very troubled that so many years and so much money had been wasted for nothing, but he needed to return early the next morning and would not give his opinion on where things stood until he got home. On the 16th, I intended to see Sir 1293, 43C, 1055, 1744, 1045, 1948, 1679, 1778,[230] to fully inform him of Mr. Burnet’s[226] resolutions, but found he was in Fife, and his family was uncertain about his return, so I went to Edinburgh from where I wrote on October 18th to Mr. Fergus,[231] asking him to meet me at Mr. Bright’s[229] house around the 26th, and included a note to Mr. Dan,[232] urging him to come immediately. I soon received a letter saying Mr. Dan had arrived and wanted to see me, but since my wife was very ill at that time, I sent a servant that night to ask for a visit from him in the countryside, which he declined, as he thought it would seem too suspicious since I had just returned home and he had only been in town for two days, so he preferred to wait awhile. I also received a letter from Mr. Fergus,[233] saying he couldn't see me for a few weeks. I was becoming increasingly anxious, having spent over a month in the countryside without achieving anything, when fortunately, around the end of the month, Mr. Bright[234] visited me at home and promised to be in town three or four days later, which prompted me to go the next day. That night, I met with Mr. Bright (who had come in a hurry) and Mr. Dan, where I read them a journal of events from when I left Diepe on July 7th, and informed them of Mr. Burnet’s[235] plans in case the French failed him. They were both pleased with the idea of Sidley and Sanderson[236] working together, but equally against Mr. Fisher’s[235] reliance on Sanderson alone. The next day, I gave Mr. Dan the letter meant for Nicolson,[237] which he delivered, and we arranged to meet that same night, which he did. However, since he had consumed a bit too much alcohol, we couldn’t get any concrete answer from him. I told Mr. Dan that it was crucial for the other letters to be sent immediately and that I was counting on him to handle that. He was then about to secure his charter from the Duke of Argyle, which he claimed was his reason for coming up, making it impossible for him to return without raising suspicion. For the second time, I unfortunately missed Sir 1293, 43C, 1055, 1744, 1045, 948, 1679, 1778,[238] as he had gone to his house in the West, nor have I been able to see him since, as I am almost always obligated to stay here. I left town on Monday the 12th and returned on Thursday the 15th, where Mr. Dan came to me before dinner, saying that young Kinny[239] wanted to speak with me. I agreed to meet him that evening at 4 o’clock, where he informed me that Lord Semple[240] and Mr. Drummond had decided to stop their business dealings, and they had sent John Drummond[241] to inform him that I had led Mr. Burnet[242] to believe that they weren’t trusted by his allies. They had then had a promising opportunity but decided to abandon it, and he told him I had[Pg 67] encouraged Mr. Fisher[243] to come over intending to make himself 1357[244] and leave his father at Harfleur,[245] which I swear before God I never mentioned to him, as it is indeed one of the things most against my principles, which I have always adhered to in Mr. Ellis’s[246] matters. Kinny's view of them, along with what I told him, made it clear to him how foolish their narrative was.

Some few days after this Mr. Fergus[247] came to town and stayed for near two weeks, he has procured the small Vessel by which this comes, and will order it to and again so often as Occasion shall offer. I had several conversations with him on the present State of affairs, but shall confine them all to his Answer, we shall he Subjoin with that of the rest, having gott them to putt their several Opinions in writing. I shall there putt down Mr. Fergus, Mr. Bright[248] and Mr. Dans[249] opinion with regard to some of the Articles I was charged with in the memorandum. Which notwithstanding they were (save Fergus) against Mr. Burnets[243] coming over, at any rate to Doit,[250] I nevertheless insisted upon it to show that I had not neglected any particular of my orders, and first as to Mr. Brights[248] going to London he proposes being there before the end of January, 2ndly The letters wrote to the several persons for money should be delivered with an Apology, that they could be wrote to in no other stile in case they had miscarried, 3rdly, The place Mr. Burnet[243] was to meet should be some small distance from Aberdeen, upon that part of the Coast lying towards Dundee, and that we should here be acquainted by one sent over a moneth before, of the day he determined to sail, providing the weather favoured him, and the moment he landed to send an express to Mr. Fergus,[249] and one to Mr. Dan[247] with instructions what day they were to ...

A few days later, Mr. Fergus[247] came to town and stayed for nearly two weeks. He arranged for the small vessel that this message comes with and will have it travel back and forth as often as needed. I had several discussions with him about the current situation, but I will limit my report to his response. We will include it along with the others, as I managed to get them to write down their opinions. I will record Mr. Fergus's, Mr. Bright[248], and Mr. Dans[249]'s thoughts regarding some of the points I was instructed to address in the memo. Even though they (except Fergus) were against Mr. Burnet[243] coming over at all, I insisted on it to demonstrate that I hadn't overlooked any aspect of my orders. First, regarding Mr. Bright[248] going to London, he plans to be there before the end of January. Second, the letters sent to various people for money should be delivered with an apology, explaining that they couldn't be written in any other style in case they didn't reach their destination. Third, the place where Mr. Burnet[243] was supposed to meet should be a little distance from Aberdeen, towards the coast near Dundee. We should be informed by someone sent over a month in advance about the day he plans to sail, weather permitting, and as soon as he lands, he should send a message to Mr. Fergus[249] and one to Mr. Dan[247] with instructions on what day they were to ...

[Pg 68]

[Pg 68]

[Hiatus in MSS.]

[Break in MSS.]

4ly as to providing of Swords it is what they dayly do, but the number to be had so small as not to be regarded. 5tly The making of Hilts and Targets impossible to be done without a Discovery and that a few days only is required to make the Targets so that they can be provided without trouble. 6thly, As to a ship for Arms, Mr. Fergus engaged to provide it.

4ly, when it comes to providing swords, it's something they do daily, but the quantity available is so small that it's not worth noticing. 5tly, making hilts and targets can't be done without a discovery, and it only takes a few days to make the targets so they can be supplied without any hassle. 6thly, regarding a ship for arms, Mr. Fergus has committed to providing it.

[Pg 69]

[Pg 69]


[Pg 71]

[Pg 71]

MEMORIAL CONCERNING THE HIGHLANDS WRITTEN BY ALEXANDER MACBEAN, A.M. MINISTER OF INVERNESS

Inverness, 10 Octr. 1746.

Inverness, October 10, 1746.

The Islands of Orkney and Shetland I know little about.[251]

The Islands of Orkney and Shetland I know little about.[251]

The Shire of Caithness is inhabited chiefly by StClairs and Dunbars. The Earl of Caithness is Chief of the StClairs who are by far more numerous than the other. I know not the precise number of men they can raise but I have heard that at the Battle of     [252]fought by them against the late Earl of Breadalbin, I think in the reign of King William, they had about 1500 men[Pg 72] Horse and Foot. But several gentlemen of that name living in the Orknies would on such ocasion with their men join their friends on the Continent. Mr. James Gilchrist, Minister at Thurso,[253] happened to be walking with a gentleman in Summer 1744 who found a letter on the road which when opened was found to be writ in Cypher by a gentleman of the name of StClair to a correspondent at Edinburgh mentioning that Shuch and Shuch would be ready at a Call each with his number of men plainly exprest; all the names were in Cypher nor could I learn the precise number. Mr. Gilchrist could not prevail with the gentleman to let him have the keeping of the letter, however this discovery was useful as it put the Lords Sutherland and Reay on their guard. ’Twas talked here in time of the Rebellion that the StClairs would have joined the Pretender but that they durst not pass through Lord Sutherland’s country[254] as his men were in arms joined by the McKays, some of the ministers of Caithness can inform you particularly about this and about Sir James Stewart of Burrows[255] who lives in the Orknies.

The Shire of Caithness is mainly populated by the StClairs and Dunbars. The Earl of Caithness is the leader of the StClairs, who are much more numerous than the others. I don't know the exact number of men they could raise, but I've heard that at the Battle of [252], fought against the late Earl of Breadalbin, probably during King William's reign, they had about 1500 men, both cavalry and infantry. Some gentlemen with that name living in the Orkneys would join their friends on the mainland with their men during such occasions. Mr. James Gilchrist, the minister at Thurso, [253], happened to be walking with a gentleman in the summer of 1744 when they found a letter on the road. When opened, it was written in code by a gentleman named StClair to a contact in Edinburgh, mentioning that certain individuals would be ready to respond to a call, each with a specified number of men; all the names were in code, and I couldn't find out the exact numbers. Mr. Gilchrist couldn't persuade the gentleman to let him keep the letter, but this discovery was useful as it alerted Lords Sutherland and Reay. It was rumored during the Rebellion that the StClairs would have joined the Pretender if they weren't afraid to pass through Lord Sutherland’s territory [254], since his men were armed and allied with the McKays. Some of the ministers of Caithness can provide more details about this and about Sir James Stewart of Burrows [255] who lives in the Orkneys.

Dunbars of Caithness

Dunbars from Caithness

I could not as yet be informed how the Dunbars of Caithness behaved, Sir William Dunbar of Hemprigs their Chief, is the principle man. He was reckoned well affected to Church and State.

I still couldn't find out how the Dunbars of Caithness were behaving. Sir William Dunbar of Hemprigs, their leader, is the main guy. He was considered supportive of both the Church and the State.

[Pg 73]

[Pg 73]

McKays of Strathnavar

McKays of Strathnavar

Next to Caithness, Southward and on the Western coast, is Strathnavar the country of Lord Reay, Chief of the McKays,[256] a zealous Presbyterian and revolutioner; with all his Clan he can raise as near as I can guess about 600 men. The part he acted last year is well known. It will be always mentioned to his honour that by his zeal and diligence he got the large Parish of Diurness divided into three and Stipends made for each of them by a general Collection through Scotland and his own liberal assistance though his estate be but 10,000£ scots there is scarce a family in this country but has been brought to have Family Worship, though that People was of old very rude and barbarous.

Next to Caithness, going south and along the western coast, lies Strathnavar, the land of Lord Reay, Chief of the McKays—a passionate Presbyterian and revolutionary; with his entire clan, he can raise about 600 men, as best as I can estimate. His actions last year are well known. It will always be noted in his honor that through his dedication and hard work, he managed to divide the large Parish of Diurness into three parts and establish stipends for each through a general collection across Scotland and his own generous support, even though his estate is only £10,000 Scots. There’s hardly a family in this area that hasn’t adopted Family Worship, even though the people here were once very rough and uncivilized.

Sutherland of Sutherland

Sutherland of Sutherland

Next to Caithness, Southward on the East coast, is the Earl of Sutherland’s country, Chief of the name of Sutherland. His Lordship’s affection to our Constitution in Church and State is well known;[257] he can raise ’twixt 1200 and 1500 men; his Estate is reckoned about £3000 scots but somewhat under burden.

Next to Caithness, south along the east coast, is the territory of the Earl of Sutherland, the chief of the Sutherland name. His Lordship’s support for our Constitution in both church and state is well known;[257] he can raise between 1200 and 1500 men; his estate is valued at about £3000 Scots but has some debts.

McLeods of Assint

McLeods of Assint

As the Shires of Sutherland and Caithness make a Peninsula formed by the Firth of Tain from the east Sea and an arm of the Western Ocean, that I may describe the People and the Country more distinctly I will travel along the Western Coast and then return Eastward.

As the Shires of Sutherland and Caithness create a peninsula formed by the Firth of Tain from the North Sea and an arm of the Atlantic Ocean, to describe the people and the land more clearly, I will first travel along the western coast and then head back east.

Next to Lord Reay’s country on the south side of the Firth called Edrachaolis and on the west coast is the country of Assint, belonging of old to a branch of the McLeod Family. This country fell into the hands of the[Pg 74] McKenzies for debt in Charles the Second’s time.[258] McLeod kept possession violently till Letters of Fire and Sword were executed against him by the Earl of Seaforth. The Commons there are chiefly McLeods. McLeod of Ginnies in east Ross is the heir male of that family. He raised one of the independent Companies last year and continued in the Government’s service till dismissed a few weeks ago. His dwelling is about 30 miles east from Assint. After the battle of Preston McDonald of Barisdale[259] with a few men went to that country and recruited about 60 men, but the Lord Reay’s or Lord Sutherland’s people—I’m not sure which—fell upon him and [recaptured] the men. He and his company were obliged to take to their heels. This country is an entire parish, and prodigious rough and mountainous but famous for good pasture and good cattle. A few of the Earl of Cromarties family lived here and were obliged to go with him to the Rebellion. Viz. McKenzie of Ardloch.

Next to Lord Reay’s land on the south side of the Firth called Edrachaolis, and along the west coast, is the region of Assint, which historically belonged to a branch of the McLeod family. This area came under the control of the McKenzies due to debt during Charles the Second’s reign. McLeod held on fiercely until Letters of Fire and Sword were executed against him by the Earl of Seaforth. The locals there are mainly McLeods. McLeod of Ginnies in east Ross is the male heir of that family. He raised one of the independent companies last year and served in the government until he was dismissed a few weeks ago. His home is about 30 miles east of Assint. After the battle of Preston, McDonald of Barisdale, along with a few men, went to that area and managed to recruit around 60 men, but the people of Lord Reay or Lord Sutherland—I’m not sure which—attacked him and recaptured the men. He and his group were forced to flee. This region is an entire parish, extremely rough and mountainous but renowned for great pastures and strong cattle. A few members of the Earl of Cromartie’s family lived here and had to join him in the Rebellion, specifically McKenzie of Ardloch.

McLeods of Cogach

McLeods of Coigach

To the south of Assint is the country of Cogach, a part of the parish of Loch-Broom formerly belonging to another family of the McLeods. [Margaret] McLeod of Cogach, the heiress of the family, was married to George, the first Earl of Cromarty.[260] This Earl, who was an antiquary, alleged that McLeod of Cogach was Chief of the whole clan, and consequently he as their representative, in right of his wife, procured the Title of Lord McLeod from Queen[Pg 75] Anne as his secondary title, and this country continued the property of the family till now. Out of Cogach and some branches of his family in Loch-Broom together with the few I have mentioned from Assint, the Earl of Cromarty raised above 200 men for the late Rebellion. What number he had altogether will be mentioned when I come to the East Coast where he dwelt.

To the south of Assint is the area of Cogach, which used to be part of the Loch-Broom parish that belonged to another branch of the McLeods. [Margaret] McLeod of Cogach, the heiress of the family, was married to George, the first Earl of Cromarty. This Earl, who was an expert on antiquities, claimed that McLeod of Cogach was the Chief of the entire clan, and as their representative by virtue of his marriage, he obtained the title of Lord McLeod from Queen Anne as his secondary title. This territory has remained in the family ever since. From Cogach and some branches of his family in Loch-Broom, along with the few I’ve mentioned from Assint, the Earl of Cromarty gathered over 200 men for the recent Rebellion. The total number he had will be discussed when I get to the East Coast, where he lived.

McKenzies of Loch-Broom

McKenzies of Loch Broom

Next to Cogach is Loch-Broom, belonging to several small Heritors of the name of McKenzie. John McKenzie of Ardloch and James McKenzie of Cepoch, the only Papists that I know in all that tract of ground except the Lady Assint, bred their children Protestants.

Next to Cogach is Loch-Broom, owned by a few small landowners named McKenzie. John McKenzie of Ardloch and James McKenzie of Cepoch, the only Catholics I know of in that area aside from Lady Assint, raised their children as Protestants.

Next is the Country of Gairloch, belonging mostly to McKenzies of Gairloch.

Next is the Country of Gairloch, mainly owned by the McKenzies of Gairloch.

McKenzies of Applecross and Loch-Carran

McKenzies of Applecross and Lochcarron

To the south of it is Applecross a new erection in the year 1720. And next to it Loch-Carran. To this last place, the Earl of Seaforth,[261] as we call him here, retired when the Rebels retreated North and gathered 600 or 800 of his men about him by which he kept them in readiness for any service proper for him to do and preserved them from straggling companies of the Rebels who went about recruiting men. This last is the property of the Earl.

To the south of it is Applecross, a new building from 1720. Next to it is Loch-Carran. The Earl of Seaforth, as we refer to him here, withdrew to this last location when the rebels moved north and gathered about 600 or 800 of his men, keeping them ready for any duties he needed to perform and protecting them from wandering groups of rebels who were recruiting. This place is owned by the Earl.

Mathesons and Murchisons of Loch Ailsh

Mathesons and Murchisons of Loch Ailsh

Next to the South is the country of Loch Ailsh the property of the Seaforth Family. The McDonalds of Glengarry of old pretended right to the country and had many battles and skirmishes with the McKenzies about it. The last was a Sea-fight in Birlins and Boats, with long poles, corn forks and Lochabyr axes, in which the McDonalds were defeated, and Glengary with many of his company killed.[262] This happened before the Reformation.[Pg 76] Most of the Commons are Mathesons and Murchisons but they join the McKenzies.

Next to the South is the country of Loch Ailsh, owned by the Seaforth Family. The McDonalds of Glengarry once claimed rights to the area and fought many battles and skirmishes with the McKenzies over it. The last was a sea battle in Birlins and boats, using long poles, corn forks, and Lochaber axes, where the McDonalds were defeated, and Glengarry along with many of his men were killed.[262] This took place before the Reformation.[Pg 76] Most of the common people are Mathesons and Murchisons, but they ally with the McKenzies.

McRaes of Kintail

McRaes of Kintail

Next to the South is the Parish of Kintail and the Parish of Muick[263] a new erection in the year 1726 taken from the old Parish of Kintail. The whole country goes under the name of Kintail. The bulk of the inhabitants are of the name of McRae, descended from the Campbells,[264] but they follow the Seaforth Family. Here lies Glen Shiel.

Next to the south is the Parish of Kintail and the Parish of Muick[263], a new establishment created in 1726 from the old Parish of Kintail. The entire area is known as Kintail. Most of the residents share the surname McRae, descended from the Campbells,[264] but they support the Seaforth Family. Here lies Glen Shiel.

In all this tract of ground, viz., from Lord Reay’s country on the north to Glenelg on the south, the people are but late converts to Presbytery. The old Episcopal Incumbents having lived long, some of them till the year 29, I could not find that any of them took the oaths to the Government. The gentlemen are most Episcopal and they or their predecessors were at Shirefmoor and Glen[Pg 77] Sheil with the late Seaforth.[265] But by the good disposition of the present Seaforth to our happy establishment, they did not think fit to join in the late Rebellion, excepting a few younger brothers who had nothing to lose and are now prisoners in London. The first Presbyterian Minister was planted in Assint in the year 1727 at Loch-Broom. He landed much sooner, but though married to a native he was so miserable that he could not live in the country.

In this entire area, from Lord Reay’s country in the north to Glenelg in the south, the people have only recently converted to Presbyterianism. The old Episcopal ministers lived a long time, some of them until 1729, and I found that none of them took the oaths to the Government. Most of the gentlemen are Episcopal, and they or their predecessors were at Shirefmoor and Glen Sheil with the late Seaforth. But thanks to the current Seaforth's favorable attitude towards our established church, they didn’t join in the recent Rebellion, except for a few younger brothers who had nothing to lose and are now prisoners in London. The first Presbyterian minister was established in Assint in 1727 at Loch-Broom. He arrived much earlier, but even though he was married to a local, he was so unhappy that he couldn’t stay in the country.

After him Mr. James Smith, now Minister at Creich in Sutherland, was ordained for the place by the Presbytery of Dingwall. The first night he came to his Parish both the eyes were plucked out his horse as his welcome to the country. Applecross, Kintail and Muick were not planted till the year 1730; Loch Carran in the year 1725. Mr. John McKilikin was ordained at Dingwall for the parish of Loch Ailsh a good time ago and though he lived for several years, he never durst enter his parish, and after his death, the Presbytery who went there to command the people about filling the parish in the year 1721 or 1722, were made prisoners in the house where they met, by men in women’s clothes, and their faces blackened. A pledge was demanded of them that they should never come to that country, which they refusing, they sent a Guard of this black crew with each of them towards their respective homes. But in the year 1727 a minister was planted there who got peaceable possession. In all or most of these parishes the Sacrament of the Supper has been lately administered and the Commons are already much recovered from their blindness and bigotry, and some of the gentlemen.

After him, Mr. James Smith, now the Minister at Creich in Sutherland, was appointed to the position by the Presbytery of Dingwall. On his first night in the parish, both of his horse’s eyes were gouged out as a welcome to the area. Applecross, Kintail, and Muick were established in 1730; Loch Carran in 1725. Mr. John McKilikin was ordained at Dingwall for the parish of Loch Ailsh quite some time ago, and even though he lived for several years, he was too afraid to enter his parish. After his death, the Presbytery, which went there to instruct the people on filling the parish in 1721 or 1722, was captured in the house where they met by men dressed in women’s clothing with their faces blackened. They were demanded to pledge that they would never return to that area, and when they refused, these masked men sent a group with each of them back to their homes. However, in 1727, a minister was settled there who gained peaceful possession. In all or most of these parishes, the Sacrament of the Supper has been recently administered, and the common folks are already much improved from their ignorance and prejudice, along with some of the gentlemen.

[Pg 78]

[Pg 78]

[The Long Island][266]

[Long Island]__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

In all this tract of ground there are no Papists but what I have named. I know the country minutely, and ministers are tolerably well accommodated in Stipend, Manse, and Glebe. I will speak of the number of men Seaforth can raise when I come to the east side of the country where his seat stands.

In this whole area, there are no Catholics except for the ones I've mentioned. I know the area very well, and the ministers are fairly well provided for in terms of salary, housing, and land. I’ll talk about how many men Seaforth can gather when I get to the east side of the country where his estate is located.

Opposite to the coast I have been describing is the Long Island. That part of it to the North, called Lewis, belongs to the Seaforth Family. It was formerly the property of McLeod of Lewis, now extinct.[267] The People here are Protestants and do not dislike the present Clergy; there were two new erections made here, Anno 1726, before the estate of Seaforth was sold by the Government; so that this country is in a tolerable state of reformation.

Opposite the coast I'm describing is Long Island. The northern part, known as Lewis, belongs to the Seaforth family. It used to be owned by McLeod of Lewis, who no longer exists. The people here are Protestants and are generally okay with the current clergy; two new buildings were constructed here in 1726, before the estate of Seaforth was sold by the government, so this area is in decent shape regarding reform.

The next district of the Long Island is called Harris.[Pg 79] The people Protestants: it belongs to the Laird of McLeod. The next portion southward is called North Uist. The people Protestants; Sir Alexander [Macdonald] of Slate, Proprietor, South Uist belongs to McDonald of Moidart, or the Captain of Clanranald, as they call him. The present Clanranald lived here: he and his People are Papists, as is McNeil of Barra,[268] and his People. In the Uists and Barra are one or two new erections of late; but by the influence of the Gentry, the diligence and insolence of the Priests, and the bigotry of the people, the ministers had little success till now. Old Clanranald was not in arms in the late Rebellion nor could many of his people in Uist get over to the Continent, for the ships of war that cruised upon the coast.

The next area of Long Island is called Harris.[Pg 79] The residents are Protestants; it belongs to the Laird of McLeod. The area further south is known as North Uist. The people there are also Protestants; Sir Alexander [Macdonald] of Slate owns South Uist, which belongs to McDonald of Moidart, or the Captain of Clanranald, as he’s referred to. The current Clanranald lives here: he and his people are Catholics, as is McNeil of Barra, along with his people. There have been one or two new constructions in the Uists and Barra recently; however, due to the influence of the Gentry, the efforts and arrogance of the Priests, and the prejudice of the people, the ministers have had little success until now. Old Clanranald did not participate in the recent Rebellion, and many of his people in Uist couldn’t get over to the Continent because of the warships that were patrolling the coast.

[The Macdonalds]

[The McDonalds]

As I have mentioned two families of the McDonalds, I will say something of them in general. They would be a great Clan and next to the Campbells in strength and number, if united under one head: but the several families of them, viz.: Clanranald, the Slate family, the Glengarry family, the Keppoch family, and even the Glencoe family, all pretend to be the lineal heir of McDonald of the Isles, Earl of Ross, who was forfeited in the time of James the Second, for joining with the Duglases and others in the Great Rebellion that then happened; and this division makes them less potent and formidable than otherwise they would be.[269] I once made an abstract of the several Rebellions and Insurrections of the McDonalds against the Kings of Scotland, and especially against the Stuart Family; by which it was very evident this people was seldom loyal to any King on the throne. If they could find no Pretender, they would find some pretence or other for war and plunder. But this paper I have lost.

As I’ve mentioned two families of the McDonalds, I’ll say a bit about them in general. They could be a powerful clan, second only to the Campbells in strength and numbers, if they were united under one leader. However, the various families, like Clanranald, the Slate family, the Glengarry family, the Keppoch family, and even the Glencoe family, all claim to be the rightful heir of McDonald of the Isles, Earl of Ross, who lost his title during James the Second's reign for joining the Duglases and others in the Great Rebellion at that time. This division makes them less powerful and intimidating than they could be. I once summarized the various rebellions and uprisings of the McDonalds against the Kings of Scotland, especially against the Stuart family; it was clear that this group was rarely loyal to any king on the throne. If they couldn’t find a pretender, they would come up with some excuse for war and plunder. Unfortunately, I’ve lost that document.

[Pg 80]

[Pg 80]

[Skye]

[Skye]

The next Island to the South and East is Skye, the property of McDonald of Slate, McLeod and McInnin,[270] The people Protestants, the Commons and most of the Gentry better disposed than those in Seaforth’s country, on the opposite continent. Here is a new erection or two made Anno 1726. Egg, Rum, Muick and Canney, etc., are little Isles adjacent to Sky; the inhabitants Popish. But about 30 years ago, McLean of Coll is said to have converted a pragmatical, forward fellow, who misled the rest, by insulting him in their presence, and on this the inhabitants of that Island became Protestants.[271] These Isles were erected into a Parish in Anno 1726.[272]

The next island to the south and east is Skye, owned by McDonald of Slate, McLeod, and McInnin. The locals are mainly Protestant, and the common folks along with most of the gentry are better off than those in Seaforth’s area on the opposite mainland. There are a few new buildings built in 1726. Egg, Rum, Muick, and Canney, among others, are small islands near Skye, and their inhabitants are Catholic. About 30 years ago, McLean of Coll reportedly converted a pushy, arrogant guy who had misled the others by insulting him in front of everyone, and as a result, the people on that island became Protestants. These islands were established as a parish in 1726.

[Glenelg and Knoydart]

[Glenelg and Knoydart]

The next country southward on the continent is Glenelg, the property of the Laird of McLeod. The people Protestants and honest, and generally well disposed: here are Barracks built for two or three companies of soldiers near the Strait that divides Sky from Glenelg: this country is fertile in grass and corn. Here are two famous Danish Forts of dry stone built very high which I have seen.

The next country south on the continent is Glenelg, which belongs to the Laird of McLeod. The people are Protestants and trustworthy, generally having a positive attitude. There are barracks built for two or three companies of soldiers near the Strait that separates Skye from Glenelg. This area is fertile with grass and grain. I’ve seen two famous Danish forts made of dry stone, built quite high.

To the south an arm of the sea called Lochiurn, i.e., Helsloch[273] runs up ’twixt this country and Cnoidart. This last is the property of Glengarry, and the most mountainous, craggy, and coarse of all the Highlands: the roads[Pg 81] are so eminently bad that there is no thought of riding in it, and in some places so steep and rocky, that they have ropes of withs tied to trees to take hold of, lest passengers should fall and break their bones. The people all Papists and mostly thieves. ’Tis a part of the parish of Glenelg, but they never give the minister any trouble, except in collecting his Stipend. Here lived those famous Cadets of Glengarrie’s family, Barisdale, and Scotos,[274] who had almost the whole country in bondage, and the people their slaves.

To the south, an arm of the sea called Lochiurn, i.e. Helsloch[273] runs between this region and Cnoidart. The latter belongs to Glengarry and is the most mountainous, rugged, and harsh area of the Highlands. The roads[Pg 81] are extremely bad, making it impossible to ride through, and in some spots, they are so steep and rocky that there are ropes tied to trees for people to hold onto, to prevent them from falling and getting injured. The inhabitants are all Catholics and mostly thieves. This area is part of the parish of Glenelg, but they rarely cause any trouble for the minister, except when it comes to collecting his Stipend. Here lived the notorious Cadets of the Glengarrie family, Barisdale, and Scotos,[274] who had nearly the entire region under their control, treating the locals as their slaves.

[Moidart and Arisaig]

[Moidart and Arisaig]

To the south of Knoidart lies Moidart and Arasag, the property of Clanranald. The people Popish but not so thievish as in Knoidart. Next it lies two great glens called Moroirs; the one of them belongs to Glengarry and the other to McDonald, commonly called McDonald of Moroir. The Inhabitants Popish. The two principal Cadets of the Clanranald family are Kinloch Moidart and Moroir, and their branches,[275] all Popish. These four last[Pg 82] countries, viz., Moidart, Arasag and the two Moroirs are in the parish of Ardnamurchan, and they with Knoidart are commonly called the Highlands by the other Highlanders. The people of Lochabyr, Glengarry, and Stratherrick[Pg 83] reckoning their own country level in comparison of these.

To the south of Knoidart is Moidart and Arasag, which belong to Clanranald. The people there are Catholic but not as thieving as those in Knoidart. Next, there are two large valleys called Moroirs; one belongs to Glengarry and the other to McDonald, often referred to as McDonald of Moroir. The inhabitants are Catholic. The two main branches of the Clanranald family are Kinloch Moidart and Moroir, and their branches, [275] are all Catholic. These last four regions, namely Moidart, Arasag, and the two Moroirs, are in the parish of Ardnamurchan, and along with Knoidart, they are commonly referred to as the Highlands by other Highlanders. The people from Lochabyr, Glengarry, and Stratherrick consider their own land flat compared to these.

Next lies Ardnamurchan in which is the famous Lead Quarry, Strontian, the property of Murray of Stanhope:[276] it belonged till of late to Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochnell: and was taken about the time of the Reformation by Sir Donald Campbell of Ardnamurchan, a natural son to Calder, from McDonald the old Proprietor. The people are generally Protestants, but with a mixture of Papists. Many of the inhabitants are Camerons and McLachlans, and violently Episcopal.

Next is Ardnamurchan, which is home to the famous Lead Quarry in Strontian, owned by Murray of Stanhope. It was recently owned by Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochnell and was taken around the time of the Reformation by Sir Donald Campbell of Ardnamurchan, a illegitimate son of Calder, from McDonald, the former owner. The majority of the residents are Protestants, but there’s also a mix of Catholics. Many of the locals are Camerons and McLachlans, and they are strongly Episcopal.

[Pg 84]

[Pg 84]

[Ardnamurchan, Morvern and Maclean’s Country]

[Ardnamurchan, Morvern, and Maclean's Land]

As I am now arrived at the Cape commonly called Ardnamurchan, I turn back to the north east, where on the Sound of Mull lies the country of Morven the property of the Duke of Argyle. The people Protestants; many of them Camerons, McLachlans and McLeans: much inclined to Episcopacy, and consequently Jacobites. There are few or no Papists: of old this country belonged to the McLean family.

As I've just arrived at the Cape commonly known as Ardnamurchan, I look back to the northeast, where the Sound of Mull is home to the region of Morven, which belongs to the Duke of Argyle. The residents are Protestants, with many being Camerons, McLachlans, and McLeans; they lean towards Episcopacy and thus are mostly Jacobites. There are very few, if any, Catholics here: this area used to belong to the McLean family.

The next country on the north east and still on the Sound of Mull is Kingairloch, the property of McLean of Kingairloch. He himself was not in the Rebellion but I saw two or three of his brothers there. The people Episcopal, and Jacobite.

The next country to the northeast and still on the Sound of Mull is Kingairloch, owned by McLean of Kingairloch. He wasn't part of the Rebellion, but I saw two or three of his brothers there. The people are Episcopal and Jacobite.

Next, still north east, and on an arm of the sea lies Ardgour, the property of McLean of Ardgour; his country lies ten or twelve miles along the sea-coast till you come to the head of Locheil. He is a well disposed old man, but as his estate is much out of his hand, his influence was not great; the people Protestants. Here lived Ludovick Cameron,[277] Uncle to Locheil, who brought out many of the inhabitants to the Rebellion, especially the Camerons who lived here.

Next, still northeast, and on a bay of the sea lies Ardgour, the property of McLean of Ardgour; his land stretches ten to twelve miles along the coastline until you reach the head of Locheil. He is a kindly old man, but since much of his estate is beyond his control, his influence isn’t significant; the people are Protestants. Here lived Ludovick Cameron, [277] Uncle to Locheil, who rallied many of the locals to the Rebellion, especially the Camerons living here.

Having now travelled on the north side of the Sound of Mull as far as the sea goes up, the last five miles of which is called Locheil, I go back to the islands in the Sound, and then will come along the south coast, and describe the countries inhabited by Rebels; I will afterwards describe the rest of Argyle if you require it.

Having now traveled along the north side of the Sound of Mull as far as the sea goes, with the last five miles called Locheil, I will return to the islands in the Sound, then make my way along the south coast and describe the areas inhabited by rebels; I will also describe the rest of Argyle if you want me to.

[Lismore, Mull, Strathlachlan]

[Lismore, Mull, Strathlachlan]

The first island of any note is Lismore; a most fertile soil; all founded on Limestone, and like garden ground, which the name of the island imports. Here was the seat of the Bishop of the Isles: it lies in the Sound opposite to Lorn and Appin; the people Protestants and well[Pg 85] disposed. It is but eight miles long and one broad, and is the property of ten or twelve heritors. To the west hereof lies Mull, a large island containing three Parishes, mostly the Property of the Duke of Argyle; formerly the property of McLean of Dowart. McLean of Lochbuie has still an estate here, of about 6000 Merks: the people Protestants mostly and well affected; but from this island, Morvern and Kingairloch there came about nine score McLeans to the Rebellion, of whom returned but 38 as a McLean told me.[278] The islands of Tyree, Coll, Jura, Colonsay, Islay, Gigha, etc. I omit as there were no men from them in the Rebellion. Only before I come to the southeast coast of the Sound of Mull, I must not omit a gentleman who rose with his men from the heart of the country of Argyle, I mean the Laird of McLachlan;[279] his small country called Strathlachlan lies to the south of Inverary and on the south side of Lochfine. He is Chief of the McLachlans, and had as I am informed, near 300 men in the Rebellion, but of the number I am not quite sure; Mr. Alexr. Campbell, minister of Inverary, must know.[280] His people of a long time profest to be of our Communion, but one Mr. John McLachlan,[281] a most violent Episcopal minister poisoned his Chief and the gentlemen of his name to a strange degree, and indeed did more mischief among other clans than any three priests I ever knew.

The first notable island is Lismore; it has very fertile soil, all based on limestone, making it look like garden land, which is reflected in the island’s name. This was the home of the Bishop of the Isles, situated in the Sound across from Lorn and Appin; the residents are mostly Protestants and generally in good spirits. The island is only eight miles long and one mile wide, owned by about ten or twelve landowners. To the west lies Mull, a large island that contains three parishes, mostly owned by the Duke of Argyle; it was formerly owned by McLean of Dowart. McLean of Lochbuie still has an estate here worth about 6000 Merks. The people there are mostly Protestant and well-disposed; however, around 180 McLeans from this island, Morvern, and Kingairloch joined the Rebellion, but only 38 returned, as a McLean told me. The islands of Tyree, Coll, Jura, Colonsay, Islay, Gigha, etc., are not mentioned as there were no men from those islands involved in the Rebellion. However, before reaching the southeast coast of the Sound of Mull, I must mention a gentleman who rose with his men from the heart of Argyll, the Laird of McLachlan; his small area called Strathlachlan is situated south of Inverary and on the southern side of Lochfine. He is the Chief of the McLachlans and, from what I’ve heard, had about 300 men in the Rebellion, though I’m not completely sure about the number; Mr. Alexr. Campbell, the minister of Inverary, would know. His people have long identified as part of our Communion, but one Mr. John McLachlan, a very zealous Episcopal minister, poisoned his Chief and the gentlemen of his name to an unusual degree, and indeed caused more trouble among other clans than any three priests I’ve ever known.

[Pg 86]

[Pg 86]

[Appin and Glencoe]

[Appin and Glencoe]

I now come as I promised to the coast on the south east side of the Sound of Mull. The first dissaffected country is Appin, inhabited by the Stuarts. The Laird of Appin[282] keeps quiet at home but the gentlemen of his clan and his tenants were in the Rebellion. The people here are Protestants, but strangely poisoned by the Nonjurant Episcopal Clergy. Adjacent to Appin is Glencoe; a small place; McDonald of Glencoe is Superior.[283] He can raise of his tenants and followers 100 men. He and his people the same as to religion as his neighbours of Appin.

I now arrive as I promised at the coast on the southeast side of the Sound of Mull. The first disaffected area is Appin, home to the Stuarts. The Laird of Appin[282] stays quiet at home, but the gentlemen of his clan and his tenants were involved in the Rebellion. The people here are Protestants, but oddly influenced by the Nonjurant Episcopal Clergy. Next to Appin is Glencoe; a small place; McDonald of Glencoe is the leader.[283] He can muster 100 men from his tenants and followers. He and his people share the same religious beliefs as their neighbors in Appin.

[Lochiel’s Country]

[Lochiel’s Country]

To the north east of Glencoe, an arm of the sea runs up from the Sound of Mull called [Loch Leven], which I now cross to describe the country of Mamore, inhabited by Camerons and belonging heritably to the Duke of Gordon, but a good part of it feued off to Locheil. The people all Protestants, but of the same kind with Appin and Glencoe. To the north east of Mamore lies Fort-William and a small Glen called Glennevis, above which stands the largest and the highest mountain in Scotland, called Ben Nevis.

To the northeast of Glencoe, there's a stretch of sea that extends from the Sound of Mull known as [Loch Leven]. I’m crossing it to describe the area of Mamore, which is home to the Camerons and is owned by the Duke of Gordon, although a significant portion has been leased to Locheil. The residents are all Protestants, similar to those in Appin and Glencoe. To the northeast of Mamore, you’ll find Fort William and a small valley called Glennevis, above which towers Scotland's tallest mountain, Ben Nevis.

On the north side of the River Lochy lies the rest of Locheil’s estate, viz., Locheil, Strathlochy, and Locharkaig. The first and second of these, six miles long each; the last, twelve miles.

On the north side of the River Lochy is the rest of Locheil’s estate, including Locheil, Strathlochy, and Locharkaig. The first two are six miles long each; the last is twelve miles.

On the north side of the Loch of Arkaig (the south side being all wood and desert) mostly inhabited by thieves, the minister of Killmaly preaches to them once a quarter or twice at most, and then the half of them cannot be present if they were willing to attend. In Winter the[Pg 87] snow and storm hinders, and in Summer they are scattered through the hills with their cattle. The Camerons boast of their being Protestants, and Locheil hindered his brother the priest[284] to preach among them, when he told him he would bring them from that villainous habit of thieving, if he would allow him to preach, and say Mass among them: his answer was that the people of Glengarry, Knoidart, Arisag, etc., who were profest Papists, were greater thieves than his people, and if he would bring these to be honest and industrious, he would then consider his proposal as to the Camerons, and till he would bring that good work to a bearing he positively forbad him to middle with his people. But Locheil and the gentlemen of his clan were great encouragers of the Nonjurants and as far as they could they perverted the Commons.

On the north side of Loch Arkaig (with the south side being all woods and wasteland), mostly populated by thieves, the minister of Killmaly preaches to them once a quarter or at most twice, and even then, half of them can’t be there even if they want to. In winter, the snow and storms make it difficult, and in summer they’re scattered across the hills with their cattle. The Camerons are proud of their Protestant faith, and Locheil stopped his brother the priest from preaching to them. He told his brother that he would help them give up their thieving ways if he could preach and say Mass among them. His response was that the people from Glengarry, Knoidart, Arisag, etc., who were devout Catholics, were worse thieves than his own people. He said that if his brother could make those people honest and hardworking, then he would think about his proposal concerning the Camerons, but until then, he strictly forbade him from dealing with his people. However, Locheil and the leaders of his clan were strong supporters of the Nonjurants and did their best to mislead the common people.

[Keppoch]

[Keppoch]

The South of the River Lochy is the property of the Duke of Gordon for 6 miles benorth Fort William: inhabited mostly by Camerons. And then begins the country of McDonald of Keppoch, partly the property of the Duke of Gordon; and partly the Laird of M‘Intoshes, Keppoch having but a small interest in it. Anno 1687 McIntosh wanting a great arrear of rents of Keppoch, and getting no satisfaction, went to that country to poynd their cattle, and brought in his train above 500 men. Keppoch, with the assistance of Glencoe and others, his good friends, paid him his rents by giving him battle,[285] killing great numbers of his men, and taking himself prisoner, and getting such good conditions as he pleased[Pg 88] before he released him. The whole ended in a famous Highland song, mocking McIntosh, and placing the true property of the country in Keppoch, as worthier to possess it. Next year Keppoch and his men came northward within 4 miles of Inverness, and sent a message to that town, to find him and his men, money, clothes, and provisions; with a threatening if they scrupled this, he would plunder the town. The town sent out three or four of their Top Burghers to commune with him. These he detained close prisoners, and sent another message demanding 4000 Merks in Specie, and a suit of their finest scarlet mounted with gold for himself with a certification that if this was not done next day, which happened to be the Sabbath, he would hang up their ambassadors, and then plunder their town. Accordingly the town redeemed themselves at the rate he was pleased to prescribe, and his fine and rich suit was finished on Sunday. Then the Ambassadors were released after a severe reprimand for their insolence in prescribing anything to him further than to ask his pleasure.

The area south of the River Lochy is owned by the Duke of Gordon for six miles north of Fort William, mainly inhabited by the Camerons. After that starts the land of McDonald of Keppoch, which is partly owned by the Duke of Gordon and partly by the Laird of M‘Intoshes, with Keppoch having a minor stake in it. In 1687, McIntosh, needing a large amount of overdue rent from Keppoch and receiving no satisfaction, went to that area to seize their cattle, bringing along over 500 men. Keppoch, with help from Glencoe and other allies, fought back, defeating him, killing many of his men, capturing McIntosh, and negotiating terms for his release. The entire incident became the basis for a well-known Highland song that mocked McIntosh and established Keppoch as the rightful owner of the land. The following year, Keppoch and his men moved north, coming within four miles of Inverness, and sent a message to the town demanding money, clothing, and supplies, with a threat to raid the town if they hesitated. The town sent three or four prominent citizens to negotiate with him. These men were taken prisoner, and Keppoch sent another message demanding 4,000 Merks in cash and a set of their finest scarlet clothing trimmed with gold for himself, warning that if this wasn’t met by the next day, which was a Sunday, he would hang their ambassadors and loot the town. Eventually, the town paid the amount he demanded, and his extravagant outfit was ready by Sunday. The ambassadors were then released after being sternly reprimanded for their audacity in suggesting anything other than complying with his wishes.

Keppoch’s people and the Duke of Gordon’s tenants in the neighbourhood are mostly Popish;[286] the greatest number of them were perverted in the Reigns of Queen Anne and George the first. They deal pretty deep in the thieving trade.

Keppoch’s people and the Duke of Gordon’s tenants nearby are mostly Catholic;[286] most of them were converted during the reigns of Queen Anne and George I. They are quite involved in theft.

[Glengarry]

[Glengarry]

The next country to the north east is Glengarry, the people Papists and better at thieving than the worst of the other tribes. Their gentlemen found a way to put most of their neighbours under Black Mail which raised[Pg 89] them some hundreds of pounds Sterling, for several years back.

The next country to the northeast is Glengarry, where the people are Catholics and skilled at stealing, even more so than the other tribes. Their leaders figured out how to extort most of their neighbors, which brought them several hundred pounds Sterling over the last few years.[Pg 89]

[Abertarff and Stratherrick]

[Abertarff and Stratherrick]

The next country still eastward is Abertarff, mostly the property of the Lovat Family: some of it feued out to Glengarry: all betwixt Fort Augustus are Popish: the few villages of Abertarf, be-east the Garrison, are inhabited by a mixture of Papists and Protestants: the people not free from theft.

The next country further east is Abertarff, mostly owned by the Lovat Family, with some parts leased to Glengarry. Everything between Fort Augustus is Catholic. The few villages of Abertarf, east of the Garrison, are home to a mix of Catholics and Protestants, and the people are not free from theft.

Here lies Lochness, the country on the South side is called Stratherrick the property of the Lovat Family. The people Protestants: they submitted to the Established Clergy for many years back. The Commons went to the late Rebellion with great reluctance, and most of them violently compelled. The first country on the north side of the lake is called Glen Morrison, the property of Grant of Glen Morrison.[287] The old man with his men were in the Rebellion: the young Laird is an Ensign in Lord John Murray’s Regiment.[288] The people a mixture of Papists and Protestants, much given to theft.

Here lies Lochness. The area on the south side is known as Stratherrick, owned by the Lovat Family. The people there are Protestants; they've been under the Established Clergy for many years. The locals joined the recent Rebellion very reluctantly, and most were forced to do so. The first area on the north side of the lake is called Glen Morrison, owned by the Grant family of Glen Morrison.[287] The old man and his men participated in the Rebellion, while the young Laird serves as an Ensign in Lord John Murray’s Regiment.[288] The community is a mix of Catholics and Protestants, and they have a reputation for being quite prone to theft.

[Urquhart and Glenmoriston]

[Urquhart and Glenmoriston]

Forward to the north east is the country of Urquhart, belonging to the Laird of Grant. Their neighbours, the McDonalds and Frasers, raised most of the men and carried them off to the Rebellion.[289] These and the Glen Morrison men after the Battle of Culloden surrendered to the young Laird of Grant, and were brought by him to the Duke of Cumberland to Inverness to deliver their arms; but by some mistake in the Report, as if they were taken in arms rather than surrendered, they were made prisoners and sent off by sea to England. The people are Protestants, though none of the most civilized.

Forward to the northeast is the country of Urquhart, which belongs to the Laird of Grant. Their neighbors, the McDonalds and Frasers, recruited most of the men and took them to the Rebellion.[289] After the Battle of Culloden, these men and the Glen Morrison men surrendered to the young Laird of Grant, who took them to the Duke of Cumberland in Inverness to hand over their weapons. However, due to some mistake in the Report, suggesting they were captured rather than surrendered, they were imprisoned and sent off by sea to England. The people are Protestants, though not the most civilized.

[The Aird]

[The Air]

Next is the country of the Aird belonging to Lord Lovat,[Pg 90] and where his house stood. The people Protestants, and of our Communion, save very few.[290] The Commons here are an honest, civilized sort of people if left to themselves.

Next is the land of the Aird, which belongs to Lord Lovat,[Pg 90] and where his house is located. The people are mostly Protestants and part of our Communion, except for a few. [290] The locals here are decent, civilized folks if left to their own devices.

[Strathglass]

[Strathglass]

Next, to the North, is the country of Strathglass, mostly inhabited by Papists. I do not hear much of their thieving, though they suffer much by the Glengarry thieves. This country belongs mostly to Chisholm of Comar (whose men were in the Rebellion, though he himself was not)[291] and partly to the Frasers.

Next, to the north, is the country of Strathglass, mainly populated by Catholics. I don’t hear much about their stealing, although they suffer a lot from the Glengarry thieves. This area mostly belongs to Chisholm of Comar (whose men were in the Rebellion, although he wasn’t himself)[291] and partly to the Frasers.

[Seaforth, Munro, and Cromartie’s Country]

[Seaforth, Munro, and Cromartie's Land]

Next is Seaforth’s country, all along pretty low and level, till you come to Ferrindonall, the country of the Munro’s; (the Highland part of his estate, I described on the first sheet as it lies on the North Sea). The Gentlemen and Commons of the McKenzies are Protestants save very few, but very much devoted to the Nonjurant Episcopal Clergy. The Seaforth family embraced the Reformation in the Minority of James the sixth. Coline, then Earl, entertained the famous Mr. Robert Bruce[292] at his house with great respect and esteem when he was banished to Inverness and the country beyond it.[Pg 91] I saw the subscription of Earl George, brother to the said Colin, to an original copy of the Covenant ingrossed on parchment, but he was afterward excommunicated by the Church for breach of trust. I am not sure if this family turned Popish before James the seventh’s time, but the then Earl, whose name was Kenneth, was Popish, as was his son the late Earl. The present Earl was very faithful to the Government all the time of the Rebellion.[293] The Munros and Rosses, I say nothing of, as their good affection to Church and State is well known.

Next is Seaforth’s land, which is mostly flat and level until you reach Ferrindonall, the Munro’s territory; (the Highland part of his estate, which I described on the first sheet, lies along the North Sea). The gentlemen and common people of the McKenzies are mostly Protestant, with very few exceptions, but they are quite devoted to the Nonjurant Episcopal Clergy. The Seaforth family accepted the Reformation during the minority of James the Sixth. Coline, who was then the Earl, hosted the famous Mr. Robert Bruce[292] at his home with great respect and honor when he was exiled to Inverness and the surrounding area.[Pg 91] I saw the signature of Earl George, who was Colin’s brother, on an original copy of the Covenant written on parchment, but he was later excommunicated by the Church for breach of trust. I'm not sure if this family converted to Catholicism before the time of James the Seventh, but the then Earl, whose name was Kenneth, was Catholic, as was his son, the late Earl. The current Earl remained very loyal to the Government during the Rebellion.[293] I won’t say anything about the Munros and Rosses, as their support for the Church and State is well known.

Next is the Earl of Cromartie’s Estate. In the low country the people well affected to our Constitution in Church and State; and very few of his Low Country tenants went with their Lord to the Rebellion.

Next is the Earl of Cromartie’s Estate. In the low country, the people are supportive of our Constitution in both the Church and State; and very few of his low country tenants joined their Lord in the Rebellion.

[Mackintosh Country]

[Mackintosh Country]

Having in the first sheet described all be-north the broad Ferry of Sutherland at which I have arrived, I come to McIntoshes country, viz., Strathnairn, Strathdearn,[294] and Badenoch. The people are all Protestants, not given to thieving, but strangely poisoned by the Nonjurant Clergy. Their dissatisfaction has sufficiently appeared by their rising with the Lady against the King, rather than with the Laird, their Chief who was a captain in the King’s pay, yea, McIntoshes own company, which he had newly levied, deserted from him and listed in what was called the Lady’s Regiment.[295]

Having described all around the broad Ferry of Sutherland in the first sheet, I now enter McIntosh's territory, specifically Strathnairn, Strathdearn, [294] and Badenoch. The people here are all Protestants and not inclined to steal, but they have been oddly influenced by the Nonjurant Clergy. Their discontent became evident when they sided with the Lady against the King, rather than with their Chief, the Laird, who was a captain in the King’s service. In fact, McIntosh's own newly raised company deserted him and joined what was known as the Lady’s Regiment. [295]

[Strathspey, Strathavon and Glenlivat]

[Strathspey, Strathavon and Glenlivet]

The next country, Strathspey, the property and seat of the Laird of Grant: this Clan raised a Regiment at the Revolution and were firm to the interest of King[Pg 92] William, but they suffered so much by the depredations of the Camerons and McDonalds that they became rather too cautious in time of the late Rebellion; the truth is they were ’twixt two fires, Lord Lewis Gordon to the east, and McIntoshes, Camerons and MacDonalds to the west, so that their country must have been severely plundered if they had been more than Neuters.[296] Besides the emulation ’twixt Grant and the President in former Elections for a member of Parliament was said to have made the Grants too [cautious]; however their good affection to the Revolution Interest has not been questioned, and they are firm Presbyterians. Theft is scarcely known in this country, though they have been great sufferers by the thieving clans to the West.

The next area, Strathspey, is the property and home of the Laird of Grant. This clan raised a regiment during the Revolution and was loyal to King William. However, they faced so much damage from the raids of the Camerons and McDonalds that they became overly cautious during the recent Rebellion. The reality is they were caught between two dangers: Lord Lewis Gordon to the east and the McIntoshes, Camerons, and MacDonalds to the west, so their region would have been heavily plundered if they had taken a more active stance. Additionally, the rivalry between Grant and the President in past elections for a member of Parliament is said to have made the Grants overly cautious. Nevertheless, their loyalty to the interests of the Revolution has never been questioned, and they are dedicated Presbyterians. Theft is hardly known in this area, although they have suffered greatly from the thieving clans to the west.

To the east of Strathspey is Strathdown[297] and Glenlivat mostly the property of the Duke of Gordon: the people mostly Popish, also the Enzie and Strathbogy, a mixture of Papists and Protestants. From these countries Lord Lewis recruited the most of his men, and in their neighbourhood is Braemar and Cromar the country of the Farquharsons: the people Protestants, with a small mixture of Papists: the Gentlemen much devoted to the Nonjurant Clergy. I am not particularly acquainted with this country; therefore, though it be large and populous, I say little about it.

To the east of Strathspey is Strathdown[297] and Glenlivat, mostly owned by the Duke of Gordon. The population is primarily Catholic, along with Enzie and Strathbogy, which have a mix of Catholics and Protestants. Lord Lewis recruited most of his men from these areas, and nearby are Braemar and Cromar, home to the Farquharsons. The people here are mostly Protestant, with a small number of Catholics, and the gentlemen are quite devoted to the Nonjurant Clergy. I'm not very familiar with this region, so even though it's large and populated, I won't say much about it.

I can say little of the country of Angus and Mearns, only I know dissaffection prevails there: nor am I much known to the country of the Duke of Atholl; the Stuarts and Robisons there are bigoted Jacobites, as are some of the Murrays. And as little do I know of the Drummonds and McGregors, but their Dissaffection is Notour. Therefore I conclude this paper with two lists as near as I can guess of the strength of the Dissaffected, and Well affected Clans in the Highlands and North Country. Which Lists you have in another sheet of this date.

I don't know much about the areas of Angus and Mearns, except that there’s a lot of discontent there. I'm also not very familiar with the Duke of Atholl's territory; the Stuarts and Robisons there are staunch Jacobites, as are some of the Murrays. I know even less about the Drummonds and McGregors, but their discontent is well-known. So, I’m ending this document with two lists that I’ve put together, estimating the strength of the disaffected and the loyal clans in the Highlands and North Country. You can find these lists on another sheet dated today.

[Caetera desunt]

[Caetera desunt]

[Pg 93]

[Pg 93]


[Pg 95]

[Pg 95]

AN ACCOUNT OF THE LATE REBELLION FROM ROSS AND SUTHERLAND WRITTEN BY DANIEL MUNRO MINISTER OF TAIN

We had notice in this country of the Young Pretender’s arrival in Lochaber, about the middle of August 1745. The friends of the Government generally despised the Attempt, and the Jacobite party showed then no open disposition to join him. It is said the first notice of his arrival was sent by the Laird of McLeod to the Lord President,[298] and that the President wrote insolently to Locheil (at whose house the Young Pretender was said to be, dissuading him from a Rising to Rebellion). Locheil was under great obligation to the President, on account of the President’s endeavours to get him reponed to his estate, which had been forfeited in the year 1715. The return Locheil made was, that he had been long in search of an important paper relating to that affair, which he now sent him enclosed: this is all he wrote, and the paper enclosed was the Pretender’s Declaration.

We learned about the Young Pretender's arrival in Lochaber around mid-August 1745. Supporters of the government generally looked down on the attempt, and the Jacobite party didn't openly show any interest in joining him. It's said that the first notification of his arrival was sent by the Laird of McLeod to the Lord President, and the President responded rudely to Locheil (at whose house the Young Pretender was supposedly staying), trying to dissuade him from rising up in rebellion. Locheil owed a lot to the President because of the President’s efforts to help him regain his estate, which had been confiscated in 1715. Locheil's response was that he had been searching for an important document related to that matter, which he now enclosed: that was all he wrote, and the enclosed paper was the Pretender's Declaration.

The first Rising in this Country was under the Earl of Cromartie, the Earl had waited on Sir John Cope at Inverness with others: he professed a steady adherence to the Government, for though he had been bred a Jacobite, yet he married young into a Whig family.[299] He had a post[Pg 96] and pension of the Government, and was universally thought a Government Man in grant of interest, and was so looked upon in point of Principle, having so often qualified to the Government. He and family joining the Established Church and having educated his eldest son in Revolution Principles.

The first uprising in this country was led by the Earl of Cromartie. He had met with Sir John Cope in Inverness along with others. He claimed to be loyal to the Government, even though he had been raised a Jacobite; he had married young into a Whig family. He held a government position and received a pension, and people widely regarded him as a Government supporter, both in terms of connections and principles, having often aligned himself with the Government. He and his family joined the Established Church and educated his eldest son with revolutionary ideals.[Pg 96]

The first step he took towards joining the Rebels (though it was not so construed at the time) was declining to accept of a Commission for his son Lord McLeod[300] to be Captain of one of the independent companies, offered him by the Lord President. He pretended for so doing a disobligement, being refused by the President the nomination of the Subalterns of said companie. After this he was observed to associate with Lord Lovat, and in the meantime Lord McLeod, his eldest son, repaired to the Highlands of Lochbroom and Cogach, where his Lordship has a considerable estate, vassalage, and superiority, being Heritable Sherriff. Lord McLeod raised the men there; but it was yet pretended this rising was for the defence of his house and person, as Lord Lovat had raised his people and kept them about him under the same pretext.

The first step he took towards joining the Rebels (although it wasn't seen that way at the time) was refusing a commission for his son Lord McLeod[300] to be Captain of one of the independent companies, which was offered by the Lord President. He claimed that he was upset because the President denied him the right to nominate the junior officers of that company. After this, people noticed he was spending time with Lord Lovat, while Lord McLeod, his eldest son, went to the Highlands of Lochbroom and Cogach, where he owned a significant estate, lands, and authority, being the hereditary Sheriff. Lord McLeod gathered men there; however, it was still claimed that this uprising was for the protection of his home and himself, similar to how Lord Lovat mobilized his people under the same excuse.

Soon after the Battle of Preston, McDonald of Barisdale[301][Pg 97] came to this country and was with my Lord openly at his house at Newtarbet, which gave the first rise to any suspicion about the Earl, especially as there was such preparation, as the making of Highland clothes, providing of Arms, and ammunition: but to cover this, it was pretended his Lordship intended a journey to Edinburgh, and must have a strong guard. However early in November he openly declared himself, and went from his house at Newtarbet to West Ross, where a part of his estate lies, and was joined by his son Lord McLeod,[Pg 98] with twixt two and three hundred of his men, taken from Lochbroom and Cogach and off his Estate in West Ross, having got none to follow him from his estate about Newtarbet which is in East Ross, but about ten men who were his menial servants and a young gentleman Roderick McCulloch of Glastalich,[302] one of his vassals, and whose family and friends had no connection with Jacobitism, and whom it is generally allowed the Earl decoyed into the Rebellion. He then marched to the Lord Lovat’s house, where he was joined by the master of Lovat, with 300 Frasers and both went to Perth.

Soon after the Battle of Preston, McDonald of Barisdale[301][Pg 97] came to this country and was openly at my Lord's house in Newtarbet, which sparked the first suspicion about the Earl. This was especially true since there was evident preparation, like making Highland outfits, gathering arms, and stockpiling ammunition. To cover this up, it was claimed that his Lordship planned a trip to Edinburgh and needed a strong guard. However, by early November, he openly declared himself and left his house in Newtarbet for West Ross, where part of his estate is located. He was joined by his son Lord McLeod,[Pg 98] along with two to three hundred of his men from Lochbroom and Cogach, as well as his estate in West Ross. He didn't have many followers from his estate near Newtarbet in East Ross, just about ten men who were his servants and a young gentleman, Roderick McCulloch of Glastalich,[302] one of his vassals whose family and friends had no ties to Jacobitism. It is generally accepted that the Earl lured him into the Rebellion. He then marched to Lord Lovat's house, where he was joined by the master of Lovat, bringing along 300 Frasers, and together they headed to Perth.

Upon the Rebels coming North after their retreat from Stirling and their arrival at Inverness, they were joined by the whole Posse of the Frasers, who were formed into three Regiments under the command of the Master of Lovat,[303] Fraser younger of Inverallachie,[304] and Fraser of[Pg 99] Foyers;[305] by the Chisholms,[306] all of them under the command of two younger sons of their chief[307] the Chisholm[Pg 100] of Strathglass; by considerable numbers of the McKenzies reckoned about 400, besides the Earl of Cromartie’s own Regiment. These McKenzies were of the Estates of Redcastle, Culcoy, Lentron, Applecross, Coul, Fairburn, Gairloch, Balmaduthy and Allangrange. Under the leading of McKenzie of Lentron, a younger brother to McKenzie of Fairburn[308] and a brother to McKenzie of Culcoy formed into a regiment under McDonald of Barasdale with some of the Banditti Highlanders formerly with him. The Earl of Cromartie when Commander in Chief benorth Beullie affected to be chief of the McKenzies. It is certain the men of the above estate were actually in arms under him and I am well assured he threatened Military Execution against McKenzie of Scatwell (a loyal family of that name) if he did not give his men also, which he absolutely refused at all hazards, and reckons himself happy his Lordship did not return with the same power from Sutherland. It is also fact that when the Rebels were exacting Cess and Levy money of all the estates of the gentlemen in Ross in the most vigorous manner, the gentlemen of the name of McKenzie whose men were in arms were excused from paying their proportion of[Pg 101] Levy money. The Rebels were joined by the McIntoshes who had not joined formerly, by the McIlivraes and McBeans under the command of McIlivrae of Dunmaglass,[309] commonly called the Ladie McIntoshes Regiment,[310] as she was known to be extremely active in raising them:[311] there[Pg 102] were also a mixt multitude from Aberdeen and Banffshire under the command of Lord Lewis Gordon and Mr. More of Stonnywood.

After the Rebels retreated from Stirling and arrived in Inverness, they were joined by the entire group of Frasers, organized into three regiments led by the Master of Lovat, Fraser younger of Inverallachie, and Fraser of Foyers; alongside the Chisholms, all under the command of two younger sons of their chief, the Chisholm of Strathglass; along with a significant number of McKenzies, estimated at about 400, in addition to the Earl of Cromartie's own regiment. These McKenzies came from the estates of Redcastle, Culcoy, Lentron, Applecross, Coul, Fairburn, Gairloch, Balmaduthy, and Allangrange. Under McKenzie of Lentron, a younger brother to McKenzie of Fairburn and a brother to McKenzie of Culcoy, a regiment was formed under McDonald of Barasdale, along with some of the Banditti Highlanders who had previously served with him. The Earl of Cromartie, while Commander in Chief north of Beauly, claimed to be the leader of the McKenzies. It is known that the men from the aforementioned estate were indeed armed under his command, and I have strong reason to believe he threatened military action against McKenzie of Scatwell (a loyal family) if he did not contribute his men as well, which he firmly refused at all costs, feeling fortunate that his Lordship did not return with the same strength from Sutherland. It is also true that when the Rebels were aggressively demanding Cess and Levy money from all the estates of gentlemen in Ross, the McKenzies whose men were armed were excused from paying their share of Levy money. The Rebels were also joined by the McIntoshes who had previously stayed out, along with the McIlvraes and McBeans under the leadership of McIlvrae of Dunmaglass, commonly referred to as the Lady McIntosh's Regiment, as she was known to be very active in raising them; there was also a mixed group from Aberdeen and Banffshire under the command of Lord Lewis Gordon and Mr. More of Stonnywood.

The arts and methods by which the Jacobites endeavoured to raise and spirit people into the Rebellion, and by which they were too successful, were the spreading all sorts of false news to the advantage of their own cause and party; particularly such as related to a French landing, and a junction in England; the venting gross misrepresentations and slanders against the King, Royal Family and Administration; pretending intolerable grievances and confident promises of relief from them: but above all, the indefeasible right of the family of Stuarts, the native interest all Scots men had in them, with the Pretender’s Declaration, were most commonly insisted upon, and this was done with all possible zeal and address, by those Jacobites of power and station who did not think it safe to risk their persons or estates in the cause; though their brothers or sons or other relations and tenants had joined openly. In this view we have been told the Rebellion was a well conducted scheme not like that in the 1715; when all the Jacobite Grandees took the field, but now when their common men were only exposed, though the attempt should not succeed the same Jacobite interest would still subsist.

The ways and methods the Jacobites used to rally and motivate people to join the Rebellion, which turned out to be quite effective, involved spreading all kinds of false news to benefit their own cause and party. This was especially true for rumors about a French landing and support in England; they spread blatant misrepresentations and slanders against the King, the Royal Family, and the government; they claimed unbearable grievances and made bold promises of relief. Most importantly, they highlighted the undeniable right of the Stuart family, the natural support all Scots had for them, and the Pretender’s Declaration. This was passionately promoted by powerful Jacobites who didn’t feel safe risking their own lives or properties in the cause, even though their brothers, sons, or other relatives and tenants openly joined the fight. From this perspective, it has been said that the Rebellion was a well-organized plan, unlike the one in 1715, when all the prominent Jacobites took to the field. This time, their common soldiers were the only ones exposed; even if the attempt failed, the Jacobite interest would continue to exist.

As to characters all above mentioned whose relations or tenants had joined were regular Jacobites, the Earl[Pg 103] of Cromartie, Lord McLeod and the Master of Lovat excepted.

As for the characters mentioned above, whose family members or tenants had joined, they were all devoted Jacobites, with the exception of the Earl of Cromartie, Lord McLeod, and the Master of Lovat.[Pg 103]

As to the well affected: Mr. Harry Munro Younger of Foulis now Sir Harry who had been newly nominated a Captain in the Lord Loudon’s Regiment having speedily raised a company of Munroes to serve in the said Regiment met Sir John Cope at the Water of Nairn and upon their arrival at Inverness, Capt. George Munro of Culkairn,[312] Sir Harry’s Uncle, waited on them, where it was concerted that the Munroes should instantly take arms and join the King’s Troops, which was done accordingly. Three Companies were raised under the Leading of Culkairn, Hugh Munro of Teaninich and William Munro of Achany, and marched with General Cope as his advanced guard to Aberdeen, where they stayed till the Army took shipping. Sir Harrie and his company went along and were at the Battle of Preston where they were taken prisoners with the other Highland Companies there. At the same time Captain Alexander M‘Cay, son to Lord Reay and Captain in Lord Loudon’s Regiment, raised a company of McCays in Strathnavar and upon notice of General Cope’s arrival at Inverness marched speedily to join him and missing the General at Inverness followed him and being informed that Gordon of Glenbucket was in arms for the Pretender, took boat upon the Murray Coast and came up with the General at Aberdeen, was at the Battle of Preston and taken prisoner, none of his men or the Monroes when prisoners would be prevailed upon to enlist for the Pretender.[313]

As for those who were supportive: Mr. Harry Munro Younger of Foulis, now Sir Harry, who had just been appointed a Captain in Lord Loudon’s Regiment, quickly raised a company of Munroes to serve in that Regiment. He met Sir John Cope at the Water of Nairn, and upon arriving in Inverness, Captain George Munro of Culkairn, Sir Harry’s uncle, met with them. They agreed that the Munroes should immediately take up arms and join the King’s Troops, which they did. Three companies were formed under the leadership of Culkairn, Hugh Munro of Teaninich, and William Munro of Achany, and they marched with General Cope as his advanced guard to Aberdeen, where they stayed until the Army boarded ships. Sir Harry and his company went along and participated in the Battle of Preston, where they were taken prisoner along with the other Highland Companies. At the same time, Captain Alexander M‘Cay, son of Lord Reay and a Captain in Lord Loudon’s Regiment, raised a company of McCays in Strathnavar. Upon hearing of General Cope’s arrival in Inverness, he quickly marched to join him, but after missing the General in Inverness, he followed him. Learning that Gordon of Glenbucket was in arms for the Pretender, he took a boat on the Murray Coast and caught up with the General in Aberdeen. He was at the Battle of Preston and was captured, but neither his men nor the Munroes would agree to enlist for the Pretender while they were prisoners.

Culkairn upon his march homeward from Aberdeen was apprised by a friend from Banff that Glenbucket with 400 men waited to intercept him. He made his[Pg 104] best preparation and resolutely went on; when Glenbucket thought proper to withdraw, which must have been owing to the known bravery of Culkairn.

Culkairn, on his way home from Aberdeen, was informed by a friend from Banff that Glenbucket and 400 men were waiting to ambush him. He made the best preparations he could and pressed on determinedly; eventually, Glenbucket decided to pull back, likely because of Culkairn's well-known bravery.

Lord Loudon and the President

Lord Loudon and the President

Immediately after the Battle of Preston, the Earl of Loudon took post for London, and without loss of time came down in a King’s Sloop to Inverness, where he took upon him the Command for the North, and acted always thereafter in concert with the President. The President disposed of the independent companies for raising of which he had blank commissions, in the following manner: A company to Captain Munro of Culkairn, two companies to the Earl of Sutherland, two to my Lord Reay, four companies to the Laird of McLeod, one company to Hugh McLeod of Guineas, four companies to Sir Alexander McDonald whereof only two came to Inverness, a company of Grants, two companies to the Lord Fortrose, a company to the Master of Ross, and a company from Inverness, commanded by Mr. McIntosh, late baillie here. The Munroes, Sutherlands, McCays, and McLeods came to Inverness upon the first call: there was difficulty in raising the McKenzie companies, though Lord Fortrose[314] exerted himself all he could to get it done and showed abundance of zeal for the Government. The best service[Pg 105] he was able to do was preventing a more general rising of his numerous Clan, in which he was successful, there being only about 700 of them in Rebellion including Cromartie’s Regiment. The Clan will at least amount to 1500.

Immediately after the Battle of Preston, the Earl of Loudon headed to London and quickly traveled down to Inverness on a King’s Sloop, where he took command of the North and always worked together with the President from that point on. The President assigned the independent companies he had blank commissions for in the following way: one company to Captain Munro of Culkairn, two companies to the Earl of Sutherland, two to Lord Reay, four companies to the Laird of McLeod, one company to Hugh McLeod of Guineas, four companies to Sir Alexander McDonald, of which only two made it to Inverness, a company of Grants, two companies to Lord Fortrose, one company to the Master of Ross, and a company from Inverness, led by Mr. McIntosh, the former bailie here. The Munroes, Sutherlands, McCays, and McLeods responded quickly to the first call: there was trouble raising the McKenzie companies, even though Lord Fortrose exerted himself as much as he could to make it happen and showed a lot of enthusiasm for the Government. The best he could do was prevent a larger uprising of his many Clan members, which he managed, as only about 700 of them were in Rebellion, including Cromartie’s Regiment. The Clan could at least number 1500.

As the Master of Ross was not in the country, the Laird of Inverchasley bestirred himself much to raise a company of Rosses for the Master, and a company of the Highlanders of the name of Ross were accordingly raised; but Malcolm Ross, younger of Pitcalnie,[315] Ensign in Sir Harrie Munroe’s Company of Loudon’s Regiment, and who had been taken prisoner at the Battle of Preston, having come to the country upon pretence of being on his parole, but in reality to serve the Rebel interest, as sufficiently appeared afterwards, got the said company[Pg 106] dismissed in the following manner. Mr. Bailey, factor to the Lord Ross in this country, ordered the company to attend at his house at Ardmore, in order to be received by Mr. Ross of Inverchasley and others. The night before the Day of the Review the said Pitcalnie lodged at the house of Mr. Baillie (Mr. Baillie not being in the knowledge of his design) and when the men appeared ready for the intended Review, Mr. Ross younger, of Pitcalnie, ordered them to follow him, which they did, and he lead them back to the Highlands. Mr. Ross of Inverchasley coming up soon thereafter, and joined by Mr. Baillie went after them and having come up with them, very seriously expostulated with Pitcalnie for his conduct, and dealt earnestly with the men to return, and engage in the intended service for the Government; which Pitcalnie refused and the men also at that time (but they absolutely declined entering to the Rebellion and when the Master of Ross came to the Country they appeared for the Government), upon which Pitcalnie repaired to Lord Lovat’s, openly joined the Rebels attended only by his servant, after the President who is his grand uncle had been at the utmost pains to reclaim him. He was debauched with the hopes of being made Laird of Balnagowan, nor were his family formerly tainted with Jacobitism.

As the Master of Ross was out of town, the Laird of Inverchasley worked hard to gather a group of Rosses for the Master, and a company of Highlanders with the name of Ross was formed. However, Malcolm Ross, the younger of Pitcalnie, an Ensign in Sir Harrie Munroe’s Company of Loudon’s Regiment, who had been captured at the Battle of Preston, returned to the area under the pretense of being on parole, but in reality, he aimed to support the Rebel cause, as later became evident. He managed to get that company dismissed in the following way. Mr. Bailey, a factor for Lord Ross in this area, instructed the company to come to his house at Ardmore to meet Mr. Ross of Inverchasley and others. The night before the Review Day, Pitcalnie stayed at Mr. Bailey’s house (without Mr. Bailey knowing his true intentions), and when the men showed up ready for the Review, Mr. Ross the younger of Pitcalnie instructed them to follow him, which they did, leading them back to the Highlands. Mr. Ross of Inverchasley soon arrived and, joined by Mr. Bailey, approached them, seriously questioning Pitcalnie about his actions. He earnestly urged the men to return and serve the Government as intended; however, Pitcalnie refused, and the men agreed at that time (though they ultimately refused to join the Rebellion and rallied for the Government when the Master of Ross came back). After this, Pitcalnie went to Lord Lovat’s, openly siding with the Rebels and accompanied only by his servant, despite the efforts of his grand uncle, the President, to bring him back. He was lured by the prospect of becoming Laird of Balnagowan, although his family had not previously been involved in Jacobitism.

The President’s house of Culloden was attacked in October by a body of Frasers, commanded by Fraser of Foyers, to the number of about 150 in the night time: they were repulsed and one of their number found wounded in an adjacent wood next day, who was brought to the President; and upon examination he discovered who were of the party. After which the President ordered him to be carried to Inverness to be cared for by a surgeon, gave him a piece of money and liberty after his cure to go where he had a mind. Some time thereafter the Earl of Loudon marched from Inverness with a body of 800 men, and apprehended Lord Lovat at his house of Castledownie and carried him prisoner to Inverness, where he was kept under a guard in a private house and in a few days found means to make his escape.

The President’s house at Culloden was attacked in October by a group of Frasers, led by Fraser of Foyers, consisting of about 150 men during the night. They were driven back, and one of their members was found wounded in a nearby woods the next day and was brought to the President. Upon examination, he revealed the identities of those involved in the attack. After that, the President ordered him to be taken to Inverness to receive care from a surgeon, gave him some money, and allowed him the freedom to go wherever he wanted after his recovery. Some time later, the Earl of Loudon marched from Inverness with a force of 800 men, captured Lord Lovat at his home in Castledownie, and took him prisoner to Inverness, where he was held under guard in a private home and managed to escape a few days later.

[Pg 107]

[Pg 107]

My Lord Loudon by the junction of the independent companies and the remains of his own Regiment, made up a body of about 2000 men at Inverness. Lord Lewis Gordon, who had been an officer in the Fleet, was at the same time very active in raising men for the Pretender in Aberdeen and Banffshire, and the Earl of Loudon being informed by intelligence from Aberdeen, and called upon by the friends of the Government there, ordered seven of the Independent Companies, viz., the four McLeod Companies commanded by the Laird of McLeod in person, the Munro and Inverness Companies, and that commanded by Captain McLeod of Guineas;[316] who accordingly marched for Aberdeen and were joined by 400 Grants at the Water of Spey who marched with them to Strathbogie 18 miles from Spey; where they again left them, and returned to their own country. The Companies continued their march for Aberdeen, and having upon the [23rd] day of December come to Inverury within 10 miles of Aboin, they were attacked in the night by Lord Lewis Gordon and his party, who had been reinforced by some companies of Lord John Drummond’s French Regiment sent for that end from the North. The attack was sustained by the Laird of McLeod and Culkairn with great bravery, who finding the superior number of the enemies, and then first observing the French Reinforcement they had got, ordered a retreat, which was managed with good advantage, having only seven private men killed and a few taken prisoners, among whom was Mr. Gordon younger of Ardoch, Culkairn’s Lieutenant. There was considerable execution done upon the Rebels as our men had the favour of the houses, garden dykes, etc., and the Rebels made no pursuit.[317]

My Lord Loudon, along with the independent companies and the remnants of his own Regiment, formed a force of around 2000 men in Inverness. At the same time, Lord Lewis Gordon, who had previously served as an officer in the Fleet, was actively recruiting for the Pretender in Aberdeen and Banffshire. After receiving intelligence from Aberdeen and calls for assistance from government supporters there, the Earl of Loudon ordered seven of the Independent Companies: the four McLeod Companies led by the Laird of McLeod himself, the Munro and Inverness Companies, and the one commanded by Captain McLeod of Guineas. They then marched to Aberdeen, joined by 400 Grants at the Water of Spey, who accompanied them to Strathbogie, 18 miles from Spey, before returning to their own region. The Companies continued their journey toward Aberdeen, and on December 23rd, when they reached Inverury, about 10 miles from Aboin, they were attacked at night by Lord Lewis Gordon and his troops, who had been reinforced by some companies from Lord John Drummond’s French Regiment brought in from the North. The assault was bravely defended by the Laird of McLeod and Culkairn, who, noticing the enemy's greater numbers and the newly arrived French reinforcements, ordered a retreat. This was executed effectively, resulting in only seven soldiers being killed and a few captured, including Mr. Gordon, younger of Ardoch, Culkairn’s Lieutenant. Our forces inflicted significant damage on the Rebels who had the disadvantage of attacking from houses, garden dykes, etc., and the Rebels did not pursue.

[Pg 108]

[Pg 108]

The Master of Ross, having come by sea to Inverness, was joyfully received by the loyal Clan of the Rosses, when he immediately repaired to this country with the concurrence of the gentlemen of his name, particularly the Laird of Inverchasley, he raised an independent Company with which he joined Lord Loudon.

The Master of Ross arrived by sea in Inverness and was warmly welcomed by the loyal Clan of the Rosses. He quickly made his way to the area with the support of his name's gentlemen, especially the Laird of Inverchasley. He formed an independent company, which he then joined with Lord Loudon.

Upon the Young Pretender’s retreat Northward, Lord Loudon being informed of his being at the House of Moy, the Laird of McIntosh’s seat, within 8 miles of Inverness, he marched from Inverness in the dead of the night with about 1200 men with a view to surprise the Pretender, but as to the particulars of this attempt and how it came to miscarry, it is referred to a more particular information.[318]

Upon the Young Pretender's retreat to the North, Lord Loudon learned he was at the House of Moy, the McIntosh's residence, just 8 miles from Inverness. He marched from Inverness late at night with about 1200 men to try to catch the Pretender by surprise. However, the details of this attempt and why it failed are deferred for more specific information.[318]

The Rebels being upon their march to Inverness both those who came the low way by Aberdeen and those who came by the Highland Road with the Young Pretender; the Earl of Loudon furnished the Castle of Inverness, which Major Grant commanded,[319] with a company of Red Coats, with stores of provisions, and added two independent Companies, the Grants and that commanded by the Master of Ross, and by the defences he made about the town he seemed disposed to maintain Inverness against the Rebels: but upon their approach and considering their numbers and that the place was not tenable, he made a well conducted retreat over the Ferry of Kissack towards Ross-shire. When the retreat was a-making the Rebels carried a field piece to the shore below Inverness and having planted it upon a rising ground within flood mark, they discharged it several times, at the Boats on[Pg 109] their passage, without doing any execution, though the bullets lighted very near the Boats, particularly that in which was Lord Loudon which was the last that passed, and one of them among the men drawn up on the other side after their landing.

The Rebels were on their way to Inverness, with some coming through Aberdeen and others taking the Highland Road along with the Young Pretender. The Earl of Loudon equipped the Castle of Inverness, led by Major Grant, with a company of Red Coats and supplies, and he added two independent Companies, the Grants and one led by the Master of Ross. He worked on fortifying the town, showing he was willing to defend Inverness against the Rebels. However, as the Rebels approached and given their numbers, he realized the location was not defensible and made a well-planned retreat over the Ferry of Kissack toward Ross-shire. During the retreat, the Rebels set up a field cannon at the shore near Inverness and fired it several times at the boats crossing, but they didn't hit anything, even though the bullets landed very close, especially near the boat carrying Lord Loudon, which was the last one to leave, and one among the men assembled on the other side after they landed.

The Rebels immediately took possession of Inverness, and laid siege to the Castle, which was surrendered the third day; but as to the particulars of this sort of siege you are referred to the proceeding of the Court Martial which condemned and cashiered the Governor.

The Rebels quickly took control of Inverness and laid siege to the Castle, which surrendered on the third day. For details about this type of siege, you can refer to the proceedings of the Court Martial that sentenced and dismissed the Governor.

Before Lord Loudon left Inverness, and upon the approach of the Rebels, he called upon the Lord Sutherland, Lord Reay and the Master of Ross, to get up to Inverness all the men they could make. Whereupon my Lord Sutherland marched in person at the head of 400 men. The Master having called upon the Laird of Inverchasley and his other friends, four companies of Rosses were ready and upon their march to Inverness their advanced party met Loudon immediately as he landed in Ross. They were astonished to find the Master of Ross their leader had been pent up in the Castle of Inverness, however they waited Lord Loudon his orders: some of them he advised home, to others he gave arms and pay, and they were with him in Sutherland. My Lord Sutherland by Loudon’s orders retreated to his own country, his four hundred men last mentioned, continued under arms. The McCays, by reason of the distance of their country, would not come up with Lord Loudon, till they found him retreated to Sutherland where they joined him.

Before Lord Loudon left Inverness, and with the Rebels approaching, he called on Lord Sutherland, Lord Reay, and the Master of Ross to gather as many men as they could in Inverness. In response, Lord Sutherland led 400 men in person. The Master, reaching out to the Laird of Inverchasley and other allies, got four companies of Rosses ready, and as they marched to Inverness, their advance team encountered Loudon as he landed in Ross. They were surprised to find that their leader, the Master of Ross, had been trapped in the Castle of Inverness; however, they waited for Lord Loudon's orders. He advised some of them to go home, while he provided arms and pay to others who then joined him in Sutherland. Following Loudon’s orders, Lord Sutherland retreated to his own lands, but his previously mentioned 400 men remained armed. The McCays, due to the distance from their territory, didn’t join Lord Loudon until they learned he had retreated to Sutherland, where they then allied with him.

The day after Loudon’s retreat from Inverness, he marched down from East Ross where he continued for three or four days: and upon intelligence that a strong body of the Rebels under the Earl of Cromartie, Commander in chief benorth Beully had come to West Ross and were upon their way to attack him. He with the Lord President and several gentlemen who had taken flight from Murray to Ross, and all the men under his command (excepting the two McKenzie Companies who dispersed themselves immediately after the retreat from[Pg 110] Inverness and not one of them having followed him) he retreated to Sutherland with a resolution to guard the Passes to that country against the Rebels. Several gentlemen of this country, particularly Inverchasley and ministers who had been so active in raising men to join Loudon, thought fit to repair at the same time to Sutherland. Lord Fortrose left his troup at Brahan and took flight to the Highlands of his own country,[320] where he remained with a body of his men about him till after the Battle of Culloden.

The day after Loudon left Inverness, he marched down from East Ross, continuing for three or four days. Upon hearing that a strong group of rebels led by the Earl of Cromartie, Commander in Chief north of Beully, had arrived in West Ross and were on their way to attack him, he fell back to Sutherland. He was accompanied by the Lord President and several gentlemen who had escaped from Murray to Ross, along with all the men under his command, except for the two McKenzie Companies, which scattered right after the retreat from [Pg 110] Inverness, none of whom followed him. He decided to secure the passes to that region against the rebels. Several gentlemen from this area, especially Inverchasley and ministers who had been active in gathering men to support Loudon, also made their way to Sutherland. Lord Fortrose left his troop at Brahan and retreated to the Highlands of his own region, where he stayed with a group of his men until after the Battle of Culloden.

The Earl of Loudon when he got into Sutherland posted his men along the Firth of Tain which divides Sutherland from Ross: from Dornoch to Lairg the difference of ten miles.

The Earl of Loudon, upon entering Sutherland, stationed his troops along the Firth of Tain, which separates Sutherland from Ross; the distance from Dornoch to Lairg is ten miles.

The remains of Loudon’s Regiment being about 200 were posted at Dornoch: the McCays being 300 at the Muckle Ferry, three miles above Dornoch: the two McDonald Companies at Pulrossie, a mile above the Ferry: the Inverness Company at Spengadale, two miles above the McDonalds: the Munroes at Criech, two miles above Spengadale: McLeod of Guineas his Company at the Bonar, a mile above Criech: the Laird of McLeod with his 400 men at the Pass of Invershin, three miles above the Bonar; and the Sutherlands to the number of 600 at Lairg and thereabout.

The remains of Loudon’s Regiment, totaling about 200, were stationed at Dornoch; the McCays, numbering 300, were at Muckle Ferry, three miles north of Dornoch; the two McDonald Companies were at Pulrossie, a mile above the Ferry; the Inverness Company was at Spengadale, two miles above the McDonalds; the Munroes were at Criech, two miles above Spengadale; McLeod of Guineas and his Company were at the Bonar, a mile above Criech; the Laird of McLeod had his 400 men at the Pass of Invershin, three miles above the Bonar; and the Sutherlands, around 600, were at Lairg and the surrounding area.

Tayne, Feb. 13, 1747.

Tayne, Feb 13, 1747.

[Pg 111]

[Pg 111]


[Pg 113]

[Pg 113]

MEMOIRS OF THE REBELLION IN 1745 AND 1746, SO FAR AS IT CONCERNED THE COUNTIES OF ABERDEEN AND BANFF

Gordon of Glenbucket rises

Gordon of Glenbucket rises

The first man in these countys that rose in this rebellion, was John Gordon, Elder of Glenbucket. Immediately on the Young Pretender’s landing, he went to the Highlands to meet him and returned directly with a Commission as Major-General and some money to raise men, and he soon got together about 300 mostly from Strathdawn[321] and Glenlivet and some too from Strathboggy, all parts of the Duke of Gordon’s Estate.

The first person in these counties to join the rebellion was John Gordon, Elder of Glenbucket. As soon as the Young Pretender landed, he went to the Highlands to meet him and quickly returned with a Commission as Major-General and some funds to recruit men. He soon gathered around 300, mostly from Strathdawn[321] and Glenlivet, with some also coming from Strathboggy, all areas of the Duke of Gordon’s Estate.

Is assisted by Skeleter in Strathdon

Is assisted by Skeleter in Strathdon

His son-in-law, Mr. Forbes of Skeleter,[322] also brought him some of this Corps from Strathdon, a country belonging mostly to gentlemen of that name, formerly vassals of the Earl of Mar, now of the Lord Braco.[323] In consequence of this vassalage most of this country had been[Pg 114] engaged in the Rebellion in the 1715, and formed a very good body of men, and as their new Superior, Lord Braco, had not yet acquired great authority over them and Mr. Forbes of New (a family all along well affected to the Government)[324] was abroad, being an officer in the army, the Rebels flattered themselves that by Skeleter’s means the rising at this time would be no less considerable; but in this they were greatly disappointed. For Mr. Leith of Glenkindy, who had lately come to that neighbourhood, being a very firm friend of the Government, and Mr. Forbes of Inverernan (whose predecessor in the 1715 was known by the name of Black Jock) much contrary to the Rebels’ expectation, declaring the same way; and Mr. Lumsden, minister of Towey, who had a small estate in that country, managing the whole with a great deal of address, as he was entirely well-acquainted with all their tempers and situations, Skeleter found his measures so effectually traversed, that he had difficulty enough in raising his own Tenants. Mr. Gordon of Avochy, Glenbucket’s Nephew, a very resolute, active lad, assisted him considerably in his Levys about Strathboggy, where he had a small estate. He, Glenbucket, had also two sons joined him, but the eldest having drunk himself blind could not attempt to march along and was of little use to him at home: the other, too, was but an insignificant creature.

His son-in-law, Mr. Forbes of Skeleter, also brought him some of this Corps from Strathdon, a region mostly owned by gentlemen of that name, who were once vassals of the Earl of Mar and are now under the Lord Braco. Because of this vassalage, most of this area had been engaged in the Rebellion in 1715 and formed a strong group of men. Since their new leader, Lord Braco, hadn’t yet established much authority over them and Mr. Forbes of New (a family always loyal to the Government) was away serving as an officer in the army, the Rebels were optimistic that Skeleter would significantly contribute to the uprising at this time; however, they were deeply disappointed. Mr. Leith of Glenkindy, who had recently moved to that area and was a staunch supporter of the Government, alongside Mr. Forbes of Inverernan (whose predecessor during the 1715 rebellion was known as Black Jock), unexpectedly declared allegiance, much to the Rebels’ surprise. Additionally, Mr. Lumsden, the minister of Towey, who owned a small estate in that region, skillfully managed the situation as he was very familiar with the local sentiments and circumstances. Skeleter found his plans effectively thwarted, making it challenging for him to rally his own tenants. Mr. Gordon of Avochy, Glenbucket’s nephew, a very determined and active young man, significantly assisted him in his recruiting efforts around Strathboggy, where he had a modest estate. Glenbucket also had two sons who joined him; however, the eldest had drunk himself blind and couldn’t march with them, proving to be of little use at home, while the other son was just an insignificant individual.

Glenbucket was at Strathboggy when General Cope came to Aberdeen,[325] where the Jacobites gave out that his numbers were at least triple of what they were in reality, and there was so great apprehension of his surprizing the town, and the Magazines there, provided for the Army, that the General thought proper to order most of his Highland companies to march from Old Meldrum in the[Pg 115] midst of the night and take possession of Aberdeen. Why General Cope was so many days at Aberdeen before he embarked, why he refused the most expeditious way of embarking his troops which was proposed by the Magistrates, of bringing about their Fish Boats from John’s Haven, and as well as using the Torry and Foothy[326] boats which would have gained him a day at least (as the Transports when the Soldiers came not out to them in boats, behoved to come up to the harbour with one tide, and go out with another) let those that know the reasons, give them. Meantime his dallying gave several of his men an opportunity of deserting to Strathboggy.

Glenbucket was at Strathboggy when General Cope arrived in Aberdeen, where the Jacobites claimed he had at least triple the number of troops he actually did. There was such fear of him surprising the town and the supply depots there for the army that the general decided to order most of his Highland companies to march from Old Meldrum in the middle of the night and take control of Aberdeen. As for why General Cope stayed in Aberdeen for so many days before he boarded his ship, why he rejected the quickest method proposed by the Magistrates to embark his troops using the fishing boats from John’s Haven, as well as the Torry and Foothy boats that could have saved him at least a day (since the transports, when the soldiers didn’t come out to them in boats, had to come into the harbor with one tide and leave with another), those who know the reasons may explain them. In the meantime, his delays allowed several of his men to desert to Strathboggy.

Glenbucket declines Fighting the Munroes

Glenbucket refuses to fight the Munroes

When the 200 Munroes under Culkairn who had accompanied General Cope to Aberdeen were returning from thence, there were great apprehensions lest Glenbucket, who was superior to them in numbers, should have intercepted them and cut them off; but Culkairn himself was under no dread, as his men were good and better armed than Glenbucket’s, and therefore marched on very briskly the way of Banff. Glenbucket had gone down to that country on an expedition for horses and arms, and was in Banff that very day the Monroes came there, but, not choosing to wait their coming up, he sheered off the way to Strathboggy.

When the 200 Munroes led by Culkairn, who had joined General Cope in Aberdeen, were heading back, there were serious fears that Glenbucket, who had more troops, might intercept them. However, Culkairn himself wasn't worried since his men were well-equipped and better armed than Glenbucket's, so they marched quickly towards Banff. Glenbucket had gone to that area on a mission for horses and weapons and was in Banff the same day the Monroes arrived, but he decided not to wait for them and took off towards Strathboggy instead.

Soon after this he had a call from the Young Pretender to hasten up, and accordingly marched South, keeping the westerly roads, and not coming near the towns of Aberdeen or the low parts of the country, but did not join the main Army of the Rebels, till after the Battle of Preston.

Soon after this, he got a call from the Young Pretender to hurry up, so he marched South, taking the western roads and avoiding the towns of Aberdeen or the low areas of the country. However, he didn't join the main Army of the Rebels until after the Battle of Preston.

Glenbucket’s Character

Glenbucket's Character

Glenbucket was a man very singular in his way, and is perhaps the only instance of a Gentleman of a low country family and education, that both could and would so[Pg 116] thoroughly conform himself to the Highland Spirit and manners, as to be able to procure a following among them without a Highland estate or any of the attachments of Chieftainry. He always discovered a great deal of personal courage and particularly behaved well in the 1715 when he commanded some men raised by the Duke of Gordon, in that Rebellion, and after that time kept up a great intercourse with the Highland Chiefs, which was much increased by the marriage of one of his daughters to one of them, McDonald of Glengarry, and it is generally believed he was very serviceable to the court of Rome, in keeping up their correspondence with the Chiefs of the Clans, and was certainly once and again of late years over at that court, when his Low Country friends believed him to be all the while in the Highlands. He had sold the estate of Glenbucket, from whence he has his designation, a good while ago, and at the breaking out of this Rebellion, had not a foot of property, and yet those creatures in Strathdawn and Glenlivet were so attached to him that a number of them rose voluntarily with him. He was however by this time so old and infirm that he could not mount his horse, but behoved to be lifted into his saddle, notwithstanding of which the old spirit still remained in him.

Glenbucket was a unique man, perhaps the only example of a gentleman from a low country family and background who could completely adapt to the Highland culture and customs, managing to gain a following among them without holding a Highland estate or any of the typical chieftain privileges. He always showed a lot of personal bravery and particularly performed well in 1715 when he led some men raised by the Duke of Gordon during that rebellion. Afterward, he maintained strong connections with the Highland chiefs, especially after one of his daughters married McDonald of Glengarry. It's widely believed he was very helpful to the court of Rome in maintaining their correspondence with the clan chiefs, and he definitely visited that court several times in recent years while his Low Country friends thought he was in the Highlands. He had sold the estate of Glenbucket, from which he got his name, quite some time ago, and at the onset of this rebellion, he had no property at all. Yet, the people in Strathdawn and Glenlivet were so devoted to him that a number of them joined him voluntarily. However, by this time, he was quite old and frail, unable to get on his horse without being lifted into the saddle, but his spirit remained strong.

More of Stonnywood

More of Stonnywood

Very soon after the Young Pretender landed, More of Stonnywood[327] prepared to join him, at first very privately, as his estate lay within three miles of Aberdeen, where all in appearance was for the Government. This gentleman very early imbibed the Jacobite principles and was entirely educated in that way; his fortune also was greatly embarrassed, so that his going off was no great surprise.[Pg 117] He was a man of little note or interest and of no great genius, but yet by his activity, diligence, and application, and his thorough acquaintance with the circumstances of Town and Country, he was very serviceable to the Rebels in those parts. He slipped away at first alone, and came up with his Pretended Prince, as he was about to enter Edinburgh, and having immediately got a Commission to raise men, he left them before the Battle of Preston, and had the assurance to enter the town of Aberdeen supported by a couple of broken merchants and York Street Cadys[328] all in white cockades, and to enlist men for the Pretender. The well affected people in town seemed only to make a jest of Stonnywood and his procession, and the magistrates found it convenient to overlook it, since any ill-usage of him might have been severly revenged by a very small party, for as Cope had carried off the Town’s Arms lest the Rebels should have seized them, a very few armed men might have come and plundered the whole town; but from this small beginning thus neglected, the Rebels very soon became masters of the place in reality and so continued till the army arrived under His Royal Highness.

Very soon after the Young Pretender landed, More of Stonnywood[327] prepared to join him, initially in secret, since his estate was just three miles from Aberdeen, which seemed loyal to the Government. This man had embraced Jacobite beliefs early on and was raised with those principles; his financial situation was also quite troubled, so his departure wasn’t much of a surprise.[Pg 117] He was not very notable or interesting and lacked great talent, but his energy, hard work, and knowledge of local conditions made him quite useful to the Rebels in that area. He initially left on his own and met up with his Pretended Prince just as he was about to enter Edinburgh. He quickly obtained a Commission to recruit men, left them before the Battle of Preston, and boldly entered the town of Aberdeen backed by a couple of struggling merchants and York Street Cadys[328] all wearing white cockades, trying to enlist men for the Pretender. The supportive locals seemed to find Stonnywood and his parade amusing, and the magistrates chose to ignore it, since any mistreatment of him might have led to serious retaliation from a small group; Cope had taken the town’s arms to prevent the Rebels from seizing them, so just a handful of armed men could have come in and stolen from the whole town. However, from this overlooked small start, the Rebels quickly took control of the area and maintained that hold until the army arrived under His Royal Highness.

Farquharson of Monaltry rises at the head of Dea

Farquharson of Monaltry stands at the top of Dea

Much about the same time Mr. Farquharson of Monaltry,[329] age 35, a gentleman of no great estate, Nephew and factor to the Laird of Invercauld, began to move at the head of Dea. This gentleman was educated in Revolution principles, but was unhappily seduced and debauched into the Jacobite scheme by the Duke of Perth, who both[Pg 118] the times that he was obliged to conceal himself from the Government made that country his retreat,[330] and Mr. Farquharson, being a sweet-tempered, agreeable lad, was his chief companion in his exile. As Invercauld gave Monaltry no countenance in his rebellion, but immediately turned him out of his Factory, he was not at first very successful in his levys, but as Farquharson of Balmurral,[331] Gordon of Blelack and some others, all of small estates, rose some time after from that country, there were at length a good many men brought from thence.

Around the same time, Mr. Farquharson of Monaltry, age 35, a gentleman with no significant wealth, nephew and steward to the Laird of Invercauld, began to rally support at the head of Dea. This man was raised with revolutionary ideals but was unfortunately led astray into the Jacobite cause by the Duke of Perth, who, during the times he had to hide from the government, made that area his safe haven. Mr. Farquharson, being a kind and likable young man, was his main companion during his exile. As Invercauld did not support Monaltry in his rebellion and quickly expelled him from his position, he initially struggled to gather support. However, as Farquharson of Balmurral, Gordon of Blelack, and a few others— all of modest means— later emerged from that region, a significant number of men were eventually drawn from there.

Hamilton and Tulloch in Strathboggy

Hamilton and Tulloch in Strathboggy

John Hamilton, Factor to the Duke of Gordon for the lands about Strathboggy, and afterwards Governor of Carlisle,[332] resolved also very early to join this Rebellion, and being a very haughty man would not act under Glenbucket, but set up on his own footing, and this stopped both their progress for a while, as their misunderstanding made them counteract one another. However Hamilton, being much assisted by one David Tulloch, a considerable tenant of the Duke’s,[333] soon got together 100 Men, thirty of whom he mounted on gentlemen’s horses which he[Pg 119] seized through the County. Hamilton undoubtedly was a noted Jacobite, but reckoned too selfish to meddle in such undertakings, so that the reason of his commencing adventurer was generally imagined to be owing to the disorder of his affairs, which indeed was not apprehended till this step brought it to light. He marched from Strathboggy to Inverury the Monday after the Battle of Preston, where he obliged the Magistrates to attend while the Pretender’s Manifesto was being read over the Cross, and next day using the same ceremony as he marched through Kintore, he came to Aberdeen just as the Council were about electing their Magistrates, which he immediately stopped unless they’d take their oaths to the Pretender (so that the Town wanted Magistrates all the time of the Rebellion), and forced the then Provost and some of the Bailies to attend the reading of their Manifestos over the Cross which was done by Sheriff Depute Petry,[334] he pretending at that time to be forced to it, though he afterwards joined them openly, and then when the Provost refused to join in their disloyal healths Hamilton poured a glass of wine down his throat, and all along behaved very insolently, but happily for Aberdeen he soon marched south with his corps.

John Hamilton, the Factor for the Duke of Gordon in the Strathboggy area and later the Governor of Carlisle, resolved early on to join this Rebellion. Being a very arrogant man, he refused to operate under Glenbucket and instead decided to go his own way, which temporarily hindered their progress due to their conflicts. However, with significant support from David Tulloch, a notable tenant of the Duke’s, Hamilton quickly gathered 100 men, thirty of whom he mounted on horses taken from local gentlemen throughout the County. Hamilton was definitely a prominent Jacobite but was considered too self-serving to engage in such efforts, so it was widely thought that his decision to become an adventurer stemmed from the chaos in his own affairs, which had gone unnoticed until this action brought it to light. He marched from Strathboggy to Inverury the Monday after the Battle of Preston, where he forced the Magistrates to attend as the Pretender’s Manifesto was read aloud in the town square. The next day, using the same tactic as he passed through Kintore, he arrived in Aberdeen just as the Council was in the process of electing their Magistrates. He immediately disrupted this unless they pledged their oaths to the Pretender, leaving the Town without Magistrates for the entire duration of the Rebellion. He compelled the sitting Provost and some of the Bailies to listen to the reading of their Manifestos in the square, done by Sheriff Depute Petry. Hamilton pretended to be coerced into this, although he later joined them openly. When the Provost refused to partake in their disloyal toasts, Hamilton forcefully made him drink a glass of wine and consistently acted with great disrespect, but fortunately for Aberdeen, he soon marched south with his troops.

Lord Pitsligo moves in Buchan

Lord Pitsligo in Buchan

The unhappy Battle of Preston soon put several in motion who till then were quiet. The Lord Pitsligo[335] who had also been engaged in the Rebellion in the 1715, and had received both his life and fortune from the Government, still retained his old affection for that cause, and never qualified to the present Government. He was justly esteemed a polite and learned gentleman, and of great integrity and honour in private life, but entirely[Pg 120] enthusiastic on the Jacobite principles. As the Young Pretender had wrote letters soon after his landing to most of those whom he thought would favour his design, Lord Pitsligo was not neglected; and though he was now old and might have had merit enough from the party for former services, yet he could not withstand this address, but immediately began to stir and rouse the friends of the Cause. In his letters on that subject he usually called the young Pretender by the name of the Amiable young Stranger. It was not however imagined that in such an infirm state, as he then was, he would have thought of undergoing the fatigues of a Winter Campaign, especially as he had a very small estate, and no Vassalages or Following to his Family, and so could not in that way make any considerable accession to the Party. But now that the family of Marischall was out of the country, and the Earl of Kintore, the next representative of that family, was in the interest of the Government, the gentlemen of Buchan who were friends of the cause and used formerly to follow Marischall, immediately had their eyes fixed on Lord Pitsligo to head them. But all these that appeared in Buchan would not probably have been of consideration enough to have determined him, if soon after Preston, a set of gentlemen in Boyne and Enzie[336] set agog by this victory had not made this an express condition to their going out, that Lord Pitsligo should go as their head. It was generally believed that this condition was insisted on by one or two of them who had been rash enough to be always speaking of their going out if they had an opportunity, and now that it came to the push, repented of it and thought still of getting off and some honour, by offering to go only if Lord Pitsligo went at their head, which they reckoned themselves sure one of his age never would; and if he did not they might then pretend they had no confidence in any attempt of this kind for which Lord Pitsligo would not venture all. But if this was their view they were disappointed in it, for the[Pg 121] rest of these gentlemen consenting to join them in making the same proposal to Lord Pitsligo, he accepted of it and so there was no retracting. The gentlemen who from this country joined his Lordship, or who were in concert with them, were Sir William Gordon of Park, Gordon of Carnusy, Gordon of Cupbairdy, Mr. Hay, Younger of Ranas, Forbes of Brucehill, Gordon of Glastirrum, Abernethy, brother to Mayen, and several other gentlemen of lesser note. Carnusy and Cupbairdy’s journey was a great surprise. The latter had no manner of tincture that way, but being a rambling young lad was determined mostly by comradeship and something too by the high regard he had for Lord Pitsligo. Carnusy was esteemed a wise, solid man and some one not at all wedded to Kingscraft. But as many debts of his never heard of formerly are appearing, this somewhat unravels the mystery.

The unfortunate Battle of Preston quickly got several people moving who had been quiet until then. Lord Pitsligo, who had also been involved in the Rebellion of 1715 and had received both his life and fortune from the Government, still held onto his old loyalty to that cause and never accepted the current Government. He was widely regarded as a courteous and educated gentleman, known for his integrity and honor in private life, but was completely enthusiastic about the Jacobite principles. After the Young Pretender sent out letters shortly after his arrival to most of those he thought would support his cause, Lord Pitsligo was not overlooked. Even though he was now old and might have earned enough merit from the party for his past services, he couldn't resist this appeal and immediately started to mobilize and inspire the supporters of the Cause. In his letters about this topic, he often referred to the Young Pretender as the “Amiable Young Stranger.” However, it was not expected that in his fragile condition, he would even consider taking on the challenges of a Winter Campaign, particularly since he had a very small estate and no vassals or followers to support him and therefore could not significantly contribute to the Party. But now that the Marischall family was out of the country, and the Earl of Kintore, the next representative of that family, supported the Government, the gentlemen of Buchan who were friends of the cause and had previously followed Marischall immediately turned to Lord Pitsligo to lead them. However, those who gathered in Buchan likely wouldn't have been important enough to sway him, if shortly after Preston, a group of gentlemen in Boyne and Enzie—excited by this victory—had not made it a condition of their involvement that Lord Pitsligo lead them. It was generally thought that this condition was pushed by one or two of them who had been bold enough to talk about joining if given the chance, but when it actually came to action, they regretted it and considered backing out with some honor by insisting they would only proceed if Lord Pitsligo led them, assuming a man of his age wouldn't agree to it; and if he didn’t, they could then claim they lacked confidence in any endeavor that didn’t have Lord Pitsligo's full commitment. But if that was their intent, they were disappointed, as the rest of these gentlemen agreed to join in making the same proposal to Lord Pitsligo, who accepted, leaving no room for withdrawal. The gentlemen from this area who joined his Lordship or coordinated with them included Sir William Gordon of Park, Gordon of Carnusy, Gordon of Cupbairdy, Mr. Hay, Younger of Ranas, Forbes of Brucehill, Gordon of Glastirrum, Abernethy, brother to Mayen, and several other gentlemen of lesser significance. The journeys of Carnusy and Cupbairdy were quite surprising. The latter had shown no inclination that way, but being a wandering young man, he was mostly swayed by camaraderie and somewhat by the high esteem he had for Lord Pitsligo. Carnusy was seen as a wise, steady man, not at all enamored with the intrigues of kingship. However, as many debts of his that were previously unknown are now coming to light, this somewhat unravels the mystery.

Joined by Buchan Gentlemen, and Aberdeen’s etc.

Joined by Buchan Gentlemen, and Aberdeen’s etc.

Immediately on Lord Pitsligo’s resolution being known there appeared also to join him, Sir William Dunbar of Durn, from Boyne, Mr. Gordon of Hallhead and Mr. Mercer, gentlemen of considerable note that resided usually in the town of Aberdeen: Mr. Gordon of Mill of Kinkardine, Mr. Petrie, Sheriff Depute, Mr. Sandilands and several gentlemen of the lower class from that place; from Buchan, Mr. More of Lonmay,[337] Factor to the Countess of Errol,[338] Cuming, younger, of Pitully, Gordon younger, of Logie, Cuming of Kinninmuth, Ogilvie of Achirris, (all gentlemen of considerable estates), Thomson elder and younger of Fachfield, Turner younger of Turnerhall, Fraser brother to Inveralachy and some others of less[Pg 122] note; also from the country about Aberdeen, Mr. Irvin of Drum, two sons of Menzies of Pitfodels, [Charles] More brother to Stonnywood, etc. But none of these gentlemen raised any number of men, but all rendevous’d at Aberdeen on horseback, with their servants, and made a pretty enough appearance. Mr. Sandilands only raised a Company of Foot which joined them there, as also did two companies raised by Stonnywood, the one commanded by himself, and the other by his brother; the whole not amounting to 200 men. These did indeed march south with Lord Pitsligo, but were afterwards incorporated in the Duke of Perth’s second Battalion. Lord Pitsligo and his friends were but short time in Aberdeen, but while they stayed, conducted with great discretion.

As soon as Lord Pitsligo's decision became known, several notable figures joined him, including Sir William Dunbar of Durn from Boyne, Mr. Gordon of Hallhead, and Mr. Mercer, all respected gentlemen from Aberdeen. Also, there were Mr. Gordon of Mill of Kinkardine, Mr. Petrie, the Sheriff Depute, Mr. Sandilands, along with various gentlemen of lower status from the area; from Buchan, Mr. More of Lonmay, Factor to the Countess of Errol, Cuming, younger, of Pitully, Gordon younger, of Logie, Cuming of Kinninmuth, Ogilvie of Achirris (all gentlemen with significant estates), Thomson elder and younger of Fachfield, Turner younger of Turnerhall, Fraser, brother to Inveralachy, and a few others of lesser note. From the surrounding countryside near Aberdeen, Mr. Irvin of Drum and two sons of Menzies of Pitfodels, along with [Charles] More, brother to Stonnywood, also joined. However, none of these gentlemen gathered a large force; they all met up in Aberdeen on horseback with their servants and made quite a decent appearance. Mr. Sandilands was the only one to raise a Company of Foot that joined them there, along with two companies raised by Stonnywood—one led by himself and the other by his brother—totaling less than 200 men. They did march south with Lord Pitsligo but were later incorporated into the Duke of Perth’s second Battalion. Lord Pitsligo and his companions stayed in Aberdeen for only a short time, but while they were there, they acted with great discretion.

Rebels favoured by Commons

Rebels supported by Commons

Hitherto the Rebellion was favoured by almost all the common people. The promise of freeing them from the Malt Tax had a surprising influence upon them, this being a tax the Farmers are especially sensible of, as they themselves pay out the money in the first instance being all Maltsters, at least for their own use. The Rebels therefore hitherto behaving civilly, listing only volunteers, paying freely, taking but some few good horses and arms as they met with them, and freeing the country people from the eternal dread they were under of the Malt Gaugers, were looked on by them as the deliverers of their country.

Until now, the Rebellion had the support of almost all the ordinary people. The promise of freeing them from the Malt Tax had a surprising impact on them, as this was a tax that Farmers particularly felt, since they are the ones who initially pay it, being all Maltsters, at least for their own use. The Rebels, therefore, had been acting respectfully, only enlisting volunteers, paying generously, taking only a few good horses and weapons as they found them, and relieving the local people from the constant fear they faced from the Malt Gaugers, were seen by them as the saviors of their land.

Why no Opposition made by the Friends of the Government

Why there was no Opposition from the Government's Supporters

It may at first seem surprising that no steps were taken in two such countys by the friends of the Government to stop this procedure. But let it be considered that after Preston people were really in a consternation for some time, and nobody knew (as the intelligence from the south, meeting with so many interruptions, was very uncertain) how soon the Government might be in a situation to force the Rebels from Edinburgh so that they might have had leisure enough to have sent north Detachments[Pg 123] and destroyed all that would attempt to disturb their friends.

It may seem surprising at first that no action was taken in two such counties by the government's supporters to stop this process. However, it's important to note that after Preston, people were genuinely panicked for a while, and no one knew (as the news from the south, which faced many disruptions, was very unreliable) when the government might be able to push the Rebels out of Edinburgh, allowing them enough time to send detachments north and eliminate anyone trying to disturb their allies.

Besides it was requisite to have a man of rank and quality at the head of such a thing (as the Government thought not fit to give anybody the authority of a Lord Lieutenant) to give a proper weight to it. But such was the situation of the Nobility of these countys, that no such thing could have been expected of any of them except the Earl of Aberdeen, whose undoubted attachment to the Government as well as his large estate and high rank might indeed have made him very serviceable had he thought it prudent to have tried to raise the friends of the Government.[339] The Duke of Gordon, had it not been prevented by his indisposition, might have been of great use not only in keeping these Counties quiet, but even in suppressing the Rebellion altogether. The Earl of Findlater’s[340] sickly constitution quite disabled him, and though the Earl of Kintore[341] had had a greater relish for military matters than he has, yet the incumbrances on his fortune would have been a drawback on him. The Lord Forbes[342] had by no means an Estate suited to his ability though he had inclined to appear. The Lord Salton[343] had no weight in the county, and the Lord Braco[344] had a great estate, yet the newness of his family would have marred any project of his forming.

Besides, it was necessary to have a person of high rank and quality leading such a venture (since the Government didn’t find it appropriate to give anyone the authority of a Lord Lieutenant) to lend it proper weight. However, given the situation of the nobility in these counties, no one could have been expected to step up except the Earl of Aberdeen, whose undeniable loyalty to the Government, along with his large estate and high status, could have made him quite helpful if he had deemed it wise to rally the Government's supporters.[339] The Duke of Gordon could have been extremely useful, had his illness not prevented him, not only in maintaining peace in these counties but also in potentially quelling the Rebellion entirely. The Earl of Findlater’s[340] poor health completely incapacitated him, and though the Earl of Kintore[341] had shown more interest in military affairs than he does now, the financial burdens on him would have hindered his efforts. The Lord Forbes[342] didn't possess an estate large enough for his abilities, despite his desire to take action. The Lord Salton[343] had no influence in the county, and although the Lord Braco[344] owned a significant estate, the recent nature of his family's status would have undermined any plans he might have made.

Gentry

Upper class

Had the gentry that did not engage been all hearty, they might indeed have come together without any of[Pg 124] the nobility’s appearing to head them, but undoubtedly a third of them were dissaffected though they were wise enough not to embark in so desperate an enterprise; and of those that were not so, many were selfish, many were careless who governed, and many were timid and fearful, so that the few who were resolute had not sufficient strength nor influence to make a stand. The most remarkable of these in Buchan and Fortmartine[345] were Lord Strichen, Mr. Maitland of Pitrichy, Mr. Forbes of Shevis, Mr. Garden of Troup and Mr. Buchan of Achmacoy. On Don side, Mr. Middleton of Seaton, Mr. Patan, Grandam, Sir Arthur Forbes, Mr. Burnet of Kemnay, Sir Archibald Grant and Mr. Leith of Glenkindy. In Garrioch, Mr. Horn of Westhall, Mr. Leith of Freefield, Sir Alexander Reed of Barra and Mr. Forbes of Blackfoord. On Deeside, the family of Leys[346] with Mr. Duff of Premnay. (N.B. a great part of Deeside is in the shire of Mearns.) As to the towns, Banff and the Seaport towns betwixt it and Aberdeen were mostly all dissaffected. Full two-thirds of the two towns of Aberdeen were very well-affected to the Government. All the Magistrates, or rather those who had been such, before Hamilton came to town, and all the old Provosts and Bailies (which makes a considerable number of the principal merchants), and both the colleges behaved in an exemplary, steady manner. The Clergy of the Church of Scotland were to a man firm in the interest of the Government in these counties and indeed everywhere else, and neither force nor flattery could alter them. The Rebels at the beginning were at great pains to coax them, and to see if possible to make the face of a party among them, and would have been excessively fond of the least compliance, had it been only the not praying for the King by name, however minutely he should have been described otherways, well-knowing that if any would go into a different way from their brethren in any thing however trifling at first, that[Pg 125] difference might be blown up to make a more considerable opposition. They had particularly hopes of the young Clergy, as they had used to keep company with them more freely in times of peace, and not carry with so much reserve as their elder brethren, and so they thought they should have much influence with them. But they were excessively baulked when they saw them maintain with vigour and zeal those principles of liberty which formerly they thought they spoke of only for amusement, when they saw them at such extraordinary pains to raise worthy sentiments in the people, and sparing neither purse nor persons in the service of the Government as far as they had opportunity; and by how much they expected more friendship from them than from the old folks, so much the more were they incensed against them than against the others from whom they expected nothing.

If the gentry who didn't get involved had been united, they could have come together without needing any nobility to lead them. However, about a third of them were disaffected, even though they were smart enough to avoid such a risky venture. Among those who weren't disaffected, many were selfish, many didn't care who was in charge, and many were simply too timid and fearful. So, the few who were determined didn't have enough strength or influence to make a real stand. The most notable figures in Buchan and Fortmartine were Lord Strichen, Mr. Maitland of Pitrichy, Mr. Forbes of Shevis, Mr. Garden of Troup, and Mr. Buchan of Achmacoy. On the Don side, there were Mr. Middleton of Seaton, Mr. Patan, Grandam, Sir Arthur Forbes, Mr. Burnet of Kemnay, Sir Archibald Grant, and Mr. Leith of Glenkindy. In Garrioch, we had Mr. Horn of Westhall, Mr. Leith of Freefield, Sir Alexander Reed of Barra, and Mr. Forbes of Blackfoord. On Deeside, the Leys family along with Mr. Duff of Premnay. (N.B. A large part of Deeside is in the shire of Mearns.) Regarding the towns, Banff and the seaport towns between it and Aberdeen were mostly disaffected. Over two-thirds of the two towns of Aberdeen were very supportive of the Government. All the Magistrates, or rather those who had been in office before Hamilton arrived, along with all the former Provosts and Bailies (which included a significant number of the main merchants), and both colleges acted in an exemplary and steady manner. The Clergy of the Church of Scotland were unwavering in their support for the Government in these counties and really everywhere else, and neither force nor flattery could change their stance. At the start, the Rebels tried hard to win them over, hoping to create a faction among them, and would have been very pleased with even the slightest sign of compliance, like not praying for the King by name, even if he was described carefully in other ways. They knew that if anyone deviated from their peers, even on something trivial at first, that difference could escalate into a more significant opposition. They especially hoped to influence the young Clergy, since they had socialized more openly with them during peacetime, unlike their older counterparts, and thought they would have a lot of sway. But they were deeply disappointed when they saw the young Clergy vigorously and passionately uphold the principles of liberty, which they had previously assumed they only discussed for fun. They were astonished to witness the young Clergy putting so much effort into raising noble sentiments among the people and not holding back in their service to the Government as much as they could. The more they expected camaraderie from the younger Clergy compared to the older ones, the angrier they became with them for not giving in, more so than with those from whom they didn't expect anything at all.

Synod meets

Synod convenes

The Synod met as usual in October in Old Meldrum, and though in the 1715 they would venture to do nothing, but immediately adjourned, yet now amidst no less danger they acted with much more vigour. They ordered a very dutiful and warm address to his Majesty which was afterwards very highly resented by the Jacobites, not only as it showed the loyalty of the Clergy, but confuted the lies published by the Rebels in their Edinburgh Courant, that the whole gentlemen in the county except four had engaged in the Rebellion, whereas the Clergy thought themselves obliged not only to vindicate the county in general, but particularly to do justice to the gentlemen of the Church of Scotland, by asserting that few or none of them had engaged in this wicked Rebellion. And indeed some gentlemen then in London owned themselves very happy in this Address, that came very seasonably, and had a very good effect, not only in taking off the bad impressions the friends of the Government had of these counties, but also in discouraging the Jacobites by undeceiving them of the vain expectations they had from there. The Synod also had a public diet[Pg 126] for Prayer to Almighty God to put a speedy stop to the Rebellion, which had a good effect not only on such of the laiety as were near enough to be present at it, but also tended to confirm and spirit up several that only heard of it. They also resolved, that whereas some ministers in their public prayers used formerly to think his Majesty sufficiently distinguished from the Pretender by calling him our Protestant Sovereign or some such other appellation, but as the omitting to name him expressly even though thus characterised was looked on as a compliance by the Rebels, who deluded many of the people with a story of their pretended Prince being a Protestant, that therefore all in time coming should pray for him by name, as they would be answerable. They also appointed that Presbyteries should meet often, and members be sent as correspondents betwixt neighbouring Presbyteries that they might advise with one another at this critical time and act with the greatest harmony. All this was punctually executed.

The Synod convened as usual in October in Old Meldrum. Although in 1715 they had taken no action and quickly adjourned, this time, facing equally serious danger, they acted with much more determination. They drafted a respectful and heartfelt address to His Majesty, which was strongly opposed by the Jacobites. This response not only demonstrated the loyalty of the Clergy but also countered the false claims published by the Rebels in their Edinburgh Courant, which stated that nearly all the gentlemen in the county, except four, had joined the Rebellion. The Clergy felt it was their duty to defend the county overall and specifically to clear the names of the gentlemen of the Church of Scotland by stating that very few, if any, had participated in this wrongful Rebellion. In fact, some gentlemen in London expressed their satisfaction with this Address, which came at a crucial time and had positive effects, not only alleviating the negative perceptions that Government supporters had of these counties but also discouraging the Jacobites by dispelling their misguided hopes. The Synod also held a public prayer meeting[Pg 126] to beseech Almighty God for a quick end to the Rebellion. This had a positive impact not only on those in attendance but also encouraged several who only heard about it. They resolved that, whereas some ministers had previously referred to His Majesty as our Protestant Sovereign or some similar title during public prayers, the omission of his name—even in this manner—was viewed as compliance by the Rebels, who deceived many by claiming that their so-called Prince was a Protestant. Therefore, they decided that moving forward, all should pray for him by name, as it would be their responsibility to do so. They also mandated that Presbyteries meet more frequently and send representatives as correspondents between neighboring Presbyteries so they could advise each other during this critical period and act in unity. All of this was carried out precisely as planned.

Nonjurant Clergy

Non-Oath-Taking Clergy

There were but two Clergy of the Church of England in all these Counties who were qualified to the Government, both at Aberdeen, but here was a very considerable number of that persuasion who were Nonjurants, which is to be sure the same thing with avowed Jacobites, and though most of them had the address to keep themselves free from open acts of Rebellion yet they were excessively instrumental by every sly act to poison the people and debauch them to rebellion, and accordingly all their hearers, almost without exception, were rank Jacobites, and the being so, was by them esteemed so very essential to salvation, that even before the Rebellion they have been known to refuse to admit some of their hearers to the Communion not only if by going to a Presbyterian Church, but even if by going to a qualified meeting of the Church of England they had heard King George prayed for, unless they solemnly professed their repentance for this crime. After the Rebellion broke out,[Pg 127] several of them turned so insolent as to pray for the Pretender by name. All of this persuasion as they all along had a most unaccountable enmity against the Church of Scotland, so they failed not to show it with a deal of rancour during the Rebellion, to all of that persuasion.

There were only two clergy members of the Church of England in all these counties who were qualified for government, both located in Aberdeen. However, there was a significant number of those with that belief who were Nonjurants, which essentially meant they were open Jacobites. While most managed to avoid open acts of rebellion, they were very effective at subtly undermining the people and inciting rebellion. Consequently, nearly all their listeners were staunch Jacobites, and they believed this was crucial for salvation. Even before the rebellion, they were known to deny some of their congregation access to communion—not just for attending a Presbyterian church, but even if they attended a sanctioned Church of England meeting where King George was prayed for—unless those individuals publicly expressed their repentance for that "crime." After the rebellion began,[Pg 127] several of them became so bold as to pray for the Pretender by name. This group had a deep-seated hostility toward the Church of Scotland, and they did not hesitate to express it with considerable bitterness during the rebellion, targeting all within that belief.

Papists

Catholics

It was but natural to expect that the Papists should favour the Rebellion to their utmost, but they are but inconsiderable in these Counties. Their meetings were quite barefaced, the Pretender openly prayed for, and a very great and good understanding there was betwixt the Nonjurants and them, so that Seaton, a priest, and Law, a Nonjurant minister,[347] were very commonly joined together among Lord Lewis Gordon’s council, who was made Governor of these counties by the Pretender. The Papists however generally had the cunning to be rather more tolerable in conversation with the friends of the Government than the Nonjurants were.

It was natural to expect that the Catholics would support the Rebellion as much as possible, but they are quite few in these Counties. Their meetings were quite blatant, openly praying for the Pretender, and there was a strong understanding between the Nonjurors and them. Seaton, a priest, and Law, a Nonjuror minister, were often seen together among Lord Lewis Gordon’s council, who was appointed Governor of these counties by the Pretender. However, the Catholics generally had the cleverness to be more agreeable in conversation with the supporters of the Government than the Nonjurors were.

Lord Lewis Gordon joins the Rebels

Lord Lewis Gordon joins the Rebels

Before the Rebels marched from Edinburgh to England they very wisely thought of means of retaining these counties under their subjection, while they should be marching south and of having reinforcements from thence ready for them against any emergence. For this purpose they wheedled over to their party Lord Lewis Gordon,[348] a younger brother to his Grace the Duke of Gordon, imagining that the very name of one so nearly connected to the Duke would have a great influence on the tenants and dependants of that family, and they well knew that[Pg 128] His Grace’s indisposition at that time would prevent any effectual measures being taken to stop this procedure. Lord Lewis was a Lieutenant in the Fleet, and had unhappily come down at that time to visit his Mother, the Duchess Dowager, who stayed near Edinburgh.[349] There he met so many old friends and acquaintances engaged in the Rebellion, who laid all oars in the water to gain him; and this indeed was no hard matter to a forward young lad like him, especially as he was to have a Feather in his cap, and to be made Lord Lieutenant of Aberdeenshire and Governor of the Towns of Aberdeen and Banff, with power of disposing of all places in them. Along with him is set down More of Lonmay, More of Stonnywood, Gordon of Avachy and Sheriff Petrie to assist him in his Government and Levys. There were also a number of Towns Burgesses named as a Council with them for the Town of Aberdeen and to manage under him in his absence but they all refused to accept; on which Mr. Moir of Lonmay was made Deputy Governor of Aberdeen, much indeed against his own inclination. He was a sensible man, but turned out very positive and arbitrary in his Government, which he had frequent opportunities of showing as Lord Lewis did not reside much at Aberdeen, and when he did, was always much advised by Lonmay. Mr. Bairde of Achmeden[350] was at[Pg 129] the same time made Depute Governor of Banff. This gentleman had shown his affection to the cause so far as to wait for the Young Pretender at Edinburgh with his white cockade, but it seems was not so far militarily disposed as to think of marching with them into England, but having a considerable estate in Banffshire, they thought he might be of service to them in this sphere; but though he at first accepted of this commission, yet he seldom if ever acted in consequence of it, and very rarely made any public appearance.

Before the Rebels marched from Edinburgh to England, they thoughtfully considered how to maintain control over these counties while heading south, and having reinforcements ready for any emergencies. To achieve this, they persuaded Lord Lewis Gordon, a younger brother of the Duke of Gordon, to join their cause, believing that his connection to the Duke would strongly influence the tenants and dependents of that family. They were aware that the Duke’s illness at the time would hinder any effective attempts to stop their plans. Lord Lewis, a Lieutenant in the Fleet, had unfortunately come down to visit his mother, the Duchess Dowager, who lived near Edinburgh. There, he encountered many old friends and acquaintances involved in the Rebellion, who did everything they could to win him over. It was not difficult for an ambitious young man like him, especially with the promise of becoming Lord Lieutenant of Aberdeenshire and Governor of Aberdeen and Banff, giving him power over all positions in those areas. Accompanying him were More of Lonmay, More of Stonnywood, Gordon of Avachy, and Sheriff Petrie to assist in his governance and levies. A number of Town Burgesses were also named to form a council for Aberdeen to manage things in his absence, but they all declined the positions. As a result, Mr. Moir of Lonmay was reluctantly made Deputy Governor of Aberdeen. Although he was a sensible man, he proved to be quite decisive and authoritative in his rule, often showing this since Lord Lewis did not spend much time in Aberdeen, and when he did, he followed Lonmay's advice. At the same time, Mr. Bairde of Achmeden was appointed Deputy Governor of Banff. This gentleman had displayed his loyalty to the cause by waiting for the Young Pretender in Edinburgh with his white cockade, but he did not seem inclined to march with them into England. However, given his substantial estate in Banffshire, they thought he could contribute in this role. Although he initially accepted the commission, he rarely acted on it and seldom made any public appearances.

Men Raised by Force

Men Made by Force

The Lord Lieutenant began with his recruiting about Strathboggy, but as the waifest kind of people had mostly gone off in the first Levys, this was not so successful as he expected. Nay, on his first coming there, his summonses to his brother’s tenants to rise were so slighted, and volunteers so backward, that he was obliged to write to Blelack[351] and some of the gentlemen of Deeside who had a number of men with them, begging of them for God’s sake to send him a command of their men that he might not be affronted. How soon he got these, then he went to work quartering on the tenants about Strathboggy till they either rose or furnished men according to the proportions he had settled. But this was tedious, as he had but a small party to quarter with, and therefore he soon took a more expeditious way, threatening to burn the houses and farmyards of such as stood out. This soon had the desired effect, for the burning a single house or farm stack in a Parish terrified the whole, so that they would quickly send in their proportion, and by this means, with the few that joined as volunteers, he raised near 300 men called the Strathboggy Battalion in the country thereabouts. The same method of military execution (a discipline till then unknown in these counties) was used in most of the high parts of the shire for forcing out men, especially on Deeside, where a great many[Pg 130] were raised in this manner. Stonnywood however found people enough about the town of Aberdeen and places adjacent without force, to form another corps for Lord Lewis called the Aberdeen Battallion consisting of about 200 men, which with the Strathboggy Batallion formed what was properly Lord Lewis’ own Regiment; Avachy being Lieutenant of the latter; Stonnywood of the former.

The Lord Lieutenant started his recruiting in Strathboggy, but since most of the more willing people had already left in the first Levys, it wasn’t as successful as he had hoped. In fact, upon his initial arrival, his requests to his brother’s tenants to rally were mostly ignored, and volunteers were hesitant, forcing him to write to Blelack and some gentlemen from Deeside who had a number of men available, pleading with them to send him some soldiers so he wouldn’t be embarrassed. Once he received these men, he began assigning quarters to the tenants around Strathboggy until they either stepped up or provided soldiers according to the quotas he had set. However, this process was slow since he had only a small group to work with, so he quickly changed his approach, threatening to burn the homes and farmyards of those who refused. This had the desired effect, as burning a single house or farm stack in a parish frightened everyone, prompting them to quickly submit their required numbers. Through this method, along with the few volunteers who joined, he raised nearly 300 men known as the Strathboggy Battalion in the surrounding area. The same tactic of military enforcement (a discipline that was previously unknown in these counties) was employed in most of the higher parts of the shire to compel men to enlist, particularly in Deeside, where many were raised in this way. Stonnywood, however, found enough willing people around the town of Aberdeen and nearby places without using force to create another unit for Lord Lewis called the Aberdeen Battalion, made up of about 200 men. Together with the Strathboggy Battalion, they formed what was essentially Lord Lewis’s own Regiment, with Avachy as Lieutenant of the latter and Stonnywood of the former.

Auchengaul raises a Company

Auchengaul starts a Company

About the same time Crichton of Auchengaul, a Popish gentleman of a very small estate, but representative of the Viscount Frendraught, raised a company and joined Lord Lewis. There were also several little people in Banffshire and Buchan, etc., who raised a few men each, and joined the Lord Lieutenant and all got commissions of one kind or other, which was by no means hard to be obtained. And thus the whole of this second Levy in the Counties of Aberdeen and Banff, under Lord Lewis would have amounted to near 800 men.

Around the same time, Crichton of Auchengaul, a Catholic gentleman with a very small estate but connected to the Viscount Frendraught, gathered a group and joined Lord Lewis. There were also several minor individuals in Banffshire and Buchan, among others, who each raised a few men and joined the Lord Lieutenant, all of whom received some form of commission, which was relatively easy to obtain. As a result, this second Levy in the Counties of Aberdeen and Banff, led by Lord Lewis, would have totaled nearly 800 men.

Comparison with 1715

Comparison with 1715

As the above is a view of the whole course of the Rebels from these Counties, it may not be amiss to compare it with what it was in the 1715, from which it will be evident that for all the noise they made about their strength in these parts it was nothing now in comparison with what it was then.

As the above gives an overview of the entire journey of the Rebels from these Counties, it might be useful to compare it with what happened in 1715. This will clearly show that despite all the claims they made about their strength in these areas, it was nothing compared to what it was back then.

In the 1715 they were supported by most of the Nobility. The Duke of Gordon (then Marquis of Huntly), the Earls of Mar, Marischall, Panmure, and Kintore, and the Lords Fraser and Pitsligo, who had all great estates, connections and dependencies in these Counties, raised their whole force and exerted themselves to the utmost in favour of the Rebellion. Whereas now Lord Pitsligo was the only nobleman that joined them unless Lord Lewis be reckoned. As to the landed gentry the difference is full as considerable. Though the most be from[Pg 131] Banffshire and Buchan, yet even there they are not one fourth of what they were in the 1715. Not one gentleman from Fortmartine unless Mr. Smith of Menie be to be reckoned, who indeed appeared with them at Edinburgh, but left them or they entered England. Not one gentleman that resided in Garrioch,[352] though in the 1715 most of them were concerned. Only five on Deeside from the head to the foot. And though there were several gentlemen of small estates on Deeside, yet all of them put together were not equal to the Laird of Invercauld who engaged in the former Rebellion. The Commons must always bear Proportion to the interests of the Gentry engaged, and though indeed this rule failed in so far at this time as that considerable numbers were raised from the estates of the Duke of Gordon, Earl of Aboyne, and Laird of Invercauld, where the Rebels had properly no interest, yet as almost none of the gentlemen that went with Lord Pitsligo raised so much as the men on their own estates, this will in good measure balance the other. There were several merchants of note appeared from the towns in the 1715, but now none but a few smugglers, and a very few tradesmen.

In 1715, they had the backing of most of the nobility. The Duke of Gordon (then the Marquis of Huntly), the Earls of Mar, Marischall, Panmure, and Kintore, along with the Lords Fraser and Pitsligo, who all had large estates, connections, and influence in these counties, rallied their entire force and did everything possible to support the rebellion. However, now Lord Pitsligo is the only nobleman who joined them, unless you count Lord Lewis. The difference among the landed gentry is just as significant. Although most of them are from Banffshire and Buchan, even there they make up less than a quarter of what they were in 1715. Not a single gentleman from Fortmartine joined, unless you consider Mr. Smith of Menie, who did show up with them in Edinburgh but left before they entered England. No gentlemen from Garrioch were involved, even though many of them were active in 1715. Only five from Deeside participated, and although there were several gentlemen with small estates on Deeside, their combined influence didn't match that of the Laird of Invercauld, who took part in the previous rebellion. The common people must always reflect the interests of the engaged gentry, and while it's true that significant numbers came from the estates of the Duke of Gordon, Earl of Aboyne, and Laird of Invercauld, where the rebels had no real stake, the fact that almost none of the gentlemen who accompanied Lord Pitsligo managed to raise even as many men from their own estates helps balance that out. In 1715, several notable merchants showed up from the towns, but now there are just a few smugglers and very few tradesmen.

As the Rebels had thus a considerable number of men in these Counties, they next fell to work to raise money for their maintenance. And first of all they resolved to levy the Cess that was due for the current year, and all arrears, and accordingly the Lord Lieutenant named a collector, and without further intimation ordered partys to quarter for it. As it was soon moving from one house to another in the towns and country about them, as the quartering money was very exorbitant, their partys numerous and costly to maintain, and the Cess being levied only according to the valued rent, and not being anything considerable in comparison of the real rent and few being willing to bear the stress any time for a small sum, it was quickly levied in the towns of Aberdeen and from the adjacent estates. But in the country it[Pg 132] necessarily took up longer time so that they never got parties sent to some estates that were most out of the way, and some gentlemen, particularly Mr. Burnet, Kemnay, and Mr. Horn, Westhall, bore the stress with great firmness and wearied them out of it at this time, as indeed Mr. Horn at length did altogether.

As the Rebels had a significant number of supporters in these Counties, they started working on raising funds for their upkeep. First, they decided to collect the Cess that was owed for the current year along with all outstanding payments. The Lord Lieutenant appointed a collector and ordered groups to go door-to-door for it. As the collection moved from house to house in the towns and surrounding areas, the quartering fees became very high, and their groups were numerous and expensive to sustain. Since the Cess was assessed only based on the valued rent, which was much lower than the actual rent, and few wanted to endure the burden for such a small amount, it was quickly collected in the towns of Aberdeen and nearby estates. However, in the countryside, it took much longer, resulting in some estates being overlooked, particularly those that were more remote. Some gentlemen, especially Mr. Burnet from Kemnay and Mr. Horn from Westhall, handled the pressure with great resilience and ultimately exhausted the collectors, with Mr. Horn eventually rejecting the payments completely.

The French Land

French Territory

In the month of December there arrived six transports at Peterhead, Aberdeen, Stonehaven, and Montrose with Lord John Drummond’s Regiment on board and the Piquets from the Irish Brigade in the French Service; all under the command of Lord John Drummond.[353] This greatly elevated the Rebels, was magnified hugely to their friends in other places, and looked upon by them all as the certain prelude of a great invasion from France. The two Lord Drummonds[354] and the Lord Lieutenant had an interview at Aberdeen, the great result of which, seemed to be the forging a letter from Lord Martial commanding his friends to join Lord John Drummond (vid. printed Copy) and a Proclamation in which his Lordship, also to show him how well he was acquainted to the French Government, threatens to punish those who did not join him according to their intentions. The letter from Lord Martial was soon suspected to be forged, from its being altered while a-printing, and from the style of it, it being very unlike Lord Martial to speak of Commanding his Friends, but after Culloden it was[Pg 133] put out of doubt by one Mr. Halyburton, who had been sent from France by Lord Martial, how soon he knew of it, to disclaim the thing entirely, to let Lord John know how much he took it amiss, and to warn his friends not to be seduced by it.[355] The Rebels were on the other Speyside before this gentleman reached them, and how soon he informed Lord John of his errand, he was either closely confined or then discharged on the severest penalty from speaking of it, so that it was but little known, till the Flight, when he acquainted several gentlemen of it, who after that made it no secret. The French that landed at Peterhead, Aberdeen, and Stonehaven, stayed not above a week or so to refresh themselves, but marched south to the Camp at Perth.

In December, six transports arrived at Peterhead, Aberdeen, Stonehaven, and Montrose with Lord John Drummond’s Regiment on board, along with the Piquets from the Irish Brigade in the French Service; all under the command of Lord John Drummond.[353] This really boosted the Rebels' morale and was exaggerated to their supporters elsewhere, who viewed it as a sure sign of a major invasion from France. The two Lord Drummonds[354] and the Lord Lieutenant met in Aberdeen, and the main outcome seemed to be the creation of a letter from Lord Martial directing his associates to join Lord John Drummond (vid. printed Copy) and a proclamation in which his Lordship, also to show his familiarity with the French Government, threatened to punish anyone who didn't join him as intended. The letter from Lord Martial was soon suspected to be a forgery due to changes made while it was being printed and its unusual style, as it wasn’t typical for Lord Martial to refer to commanding his friends. However, after Culloden, it was[Pg 133] confirmed by Mr. Halyburton, who had been sent from France by Lord Martial. As soon as he learned of it, he completely denied it, letting Lord John know how upset he was and warning his friends not to be misled by it.[355] The Rebels were already in the other Speyside before this man reached them, and as soon as he informed Lord John about his mission, he was either tightly restricted or released on strict orders not to discuss it, so it went mostly unnoticed until the Flight, when he told several gentlemen about it, who then made it widely known. The French who landed at Peterhead, Aberdeen, and Stonehaven didn't stay more than a week to rest; they marched south to the Camp at Perth.

Levy Money

Collect Fees

The Cess went but a short way to answer their demands, next therefore they resolved to demand what was called Levy Money, or Militia money; accordingly Stonnywood by order of the Lord Lieutenant wrote Circular letters to the several gentlemen or their factors, demanding an able bodied man sufficiently accoutred in the Highland Dress[356] for each £100 Scots of valued rent, or then £5 Sterling to raise one. The man was but a pretext, it was the money they wanted. This indeed would have amounted to a very considerable sum; no less than about £12,000 Sterling for the County of Aberdeen alone, which will be 5s. Ster. in the pound off the real rack’d rent, which exorbitant demand would at any time have been very hard upon Lairds and Tenants but after two bad crops and so many other losses, was indeed more than they could bear. However these reasons availed nothing[Pg 134] to the Lord Lieutenant, or his Depute (who was by no means ignorant of the state of the counties) but to work they went, how soon they had got in most of the Cess, to quarter for it. This began at length to open the eyes of many of the people, who had been formerly cheated by promises of freedom from taxes, especially the Malt Tax, but now they saw how delusive these were, and this not a little confirmed the few who had all along wished well to the Government. Even the selfish among the gentry who professed not to care who reigned, were not now quite so indifferent, and even many secret Jacobites were disgusted.

The Cess barely met their demands, so they decided to ask for what was called Levy Money, or Militia money. Stonnywood, acting on orders from the Lord Lieutenant, sent out circular letters to various gentlemen or their agents, requesting one able-bodied man properly equipped in Highland Dress for each £100 Scots of assessed rent, or £5 Sterling to recruit one. The focus on the man was just a cover; what they really wanted was the money. This would have ended up being a significant amount—around £12,000 Sterling for the County of Aberdeen alone, which is 5s. Ster. in the pound off the actual rented land. This excessive demand would have been tough on landlords and tenants at any time, but after two bad harvests and numerous other losses, it was more than they could handle. However, these concerns meant nothing to the Lord Lieutenant or his deputy (who was certainly aware of the counties' conditions), and they pressed on with their plans as soon as they collected most of the Cess to enforce it. This gradually opened the eyes of many people who had previously been misled by promises of tax relief, especially regarding the Malt Tax; now they realized how deceptive those promises were. This even strengthened the few who had always supported the Government. Even the self-interested among the gentry, who claimed to be indifferent to who was in power, were not so apathetic anymore, and many secret Jacobites were also turned off by the situation.

Lord Loudon Invited

Lord Loudon Invited

The friends of the Government seeing no end of this oppression, while the Rebels were their masters, sent several messages to the President and Lord Loudon[357] to send some men to their relief. They were especially instant from the town of Aberdeen, this being the seat of their Government, and consequently most exposed to their tyranny, which was so great that the usual freedom of conversation was entirely banished, at least none could promise how long they could call anything their own, and even already they were speaking of imposing a Loan, how soon the Militia money was levied. But their keenness to obtain relief and to persuade Lord Loudon to undertake it, probably made them represent the strength of the Rebels as more insignificant than it really was, which no doubt has been one reason why the party sent was not more numerous.

The government supporters, seeing no end to this oppression while the rebels were in charge, sent several messages to the President and Lord Loudon to request some men for their assistance. They were especially urgent about this from the town of Aberdeen, which was the center of their government and therefore most vulnerable to the tyranny. The oppression was so severe that normal conversation had completely stopped; nobody could guarantee how long they could keep anything that belonged to them. They were even talking about imposing a loan and how soon the militia funds would be raised. However, their eagerness to get help and persuade Lord Loudon to take action may have led them to downplay the strength of the rebels, which likely contributed to why the force sent was not larger.

Burning Order

Burning Order

The Levy money coming in but slowly, for all the stress of quartering, which stress alone induced some to pay it, but some few that were such hearty friends as to need[Pg 135] only the pretence of force, the Lord Lieutenant grew quite impatient and issued what was called the Fire Ordinance (vid. Gent. Mag. for January 1746, p. 29th).[358] Party’s were sent to several Districts of the country, with orders to quarter on the gentlemen’s houses (not on the tenants’ as usual) and if against such a time the money was not payed, to begin with burning the gentleman’s house and Planting, then the tenants’ houses and cornyards and so on through the district. But notwithstanding of these dreadful threatenings, none but some very timourous people paid, till they should at least see what would be the consequences of the Northern aid which now began to be spoke of and pretty confidently expected.

The Levy money was coming in, but slowly, due to the stress of quartering. This stress alone made some people pay, but only a few who were good friends needed just the hint of force. The Lord Lieutenant became quite impatient and issued what was called the Fire Ordinance (see Gent. Mag. for January 1746, p. 29). Parties were sent to various districts of the country, with orders to quarter on the gentlemen’s houses (not on the tenants’ as was usual). If the money wasn’t paid by a certain time, they would start by burning the gentleman’s house and planting, then move on to the tenants’ houses and cornyards, and so on throughout the district. Despite these terrible threats, only some very timid people paid, waiting to see what the consequences of the Northern aid, which was now beginning to be discussed and confidently expected, would be.

Old Aberdeen Distressed

Old Aberdeen Distressed

As the old town of Aberdeen had in proportion to such a place discovered a more than ordinary zeal for the Government so that the Rebel Governors distinguished it accordingly by a demand of £215 Ster. of Levy money, a very great sum for so small a village, and by beginning with them these new methods of raising it. They impudently[Pg 136] proposed it among the Whigs without ever regarding whether or not they had any property in Lands or houses and particularly the Masters of the Kings College had their small stipends very severely cessed. But when they could not even thus get their full demand answered, Lonmay ordered about £40 Ster. of it to be taken from the Poor’s Box and from some small funds that belonged to an hospital for poor widows and some other such charitable funds. Large parties were quartered through the town in the gentlemen’s houses for several days, but even this severe stress not proving effectual, intimation was made by Tuke of Drum, that if the money was not paid against a certain hour the Town was to be burnt. This indeed alarmed them and the gentlemen were forced to seem in so far to comply as to beg only delays till the money should be got, and this they had the art to obtain from time to time for two or three days, till at length they had pretty certain information that McLeod and Culcairn’s men were come the length of Banff and Strathboggy, on which most of the gentlemen of note in the place, slipped out of town or concealed themselves, without paying a farthing, and leaving the Rebels to do with the town what they pleased. But as they too were sensible by this time of the enemy’s approach they would not venture on such a severity till they should see the event.

As the old town of Aberdeen showed an unusually strong support for the Government compared to similar places, the Rebel Governors noted this and demanded £215 Sterling as a levy, which was a huge amount for such a small village. They brazenly brought this up among the Whigs without considering whether they owned any land or property, and notably, the Masters of the King's College had their small stipends heavily taxed. When they still couldn’t collect the full amount demanded, Lonmay ordered about £40 Sterling to be taken from the Poor’s Box and some small funds from a hospital for poor widows and other charitable organizations. Large groups were stationed in the gentlemen’s homes for several days, but even this pressure wasn’t effective. Eventually, Tuke of Drum warned that if the money wasn’t paid by a certain time, the town would be burned. This frightened them, and the gentlemen felt compelled to at least ask for delays until they could raise the money, which they skillfully managed to do for a couple of days. However, when they learned that McLeod and Culcairn’s forces had reached Banff and Strathboggy, many of the notable gentlemen in the area discreetly left town or hid, without paying a penny, leaving the Rebels to do as they wished with the town. But the Rebels, aware of the enemy approaching, were cautious and didn’t want to resort to such extreme measures until they saw what would happen.

McLeod Marches

McLeod Marches

As for McLeod’s March (vid. Gents. Mag., Jan. 1746, p. 23). It was Gordon of Avachy and Gordon of Aberlour that opposed them at the passage of the Spey, but they quickly retreated. They had the Strathboggy Batallion under their command and had been quartering for Cess and Levy money about Strathboggy and Banff. They marched to Aberdeen the day appointed for the Public Fast by his Majesty, December 17th, which however was very punctually observed even where they passed and in general was so both by Clergy and people both in town and country, though the Clergy indeed did meet[Pg 137] with some insults in a few places. Immediately on McLeod’s passing the Spey, the Rebels called in all their Quartering parties, and the Deeside men to the town of Aberdeen and sent expresses to their friends in Angus and Mearns to send them assistance.

As for McLeod’s March (see Gents. Mag., Jan. 1746, p. 23). It was Gordon of Avachy and Gordon of Aberlour who opposed them at the Spey crossing, but they quickly fell back. They had the Strathboggy Battalion under their command and had been collecting Cess and Levy money around Strathboggy and Banff. They marched to Aberdeen on the day set for the Public Fast by his Majesty, December 17th, which was observed very strictly even where they passed, and in general, both clergy and people in town and countryside complied, though the clergy did face some disrespect in a few places. As soon as McLeod crossed the Spey, the Rebels recalled all their Quartering parties and the Deeside men to the town of Aberdeen and sent messages to their allies in Angus and Mearns asking for support.

The McLeods joined the two companies under Culkairn,[359] at Inverury, upon Saturday, December 20th, the whole body being 700 men complete. 400 of those under McLeod were quartered in the town of Inverury, the rest of that name and Culkairn’s two companies were cantonned in farmers’ houses along the Ury to the north west of the town, many of them more than a mile and a half’s distance though there was no worldly necessity for this, as the town of Inverury contained two regiments of the Duke’s army for some weeks without a man of them going a stone cast from it. Against night the Rebel Reinforcements were come to Aberdeen consisting of about 150 of the French Picquets who had remained at Montrose and more than 200 Angus and Mearns Militia, so that there would have been in whole about 1200 men at Aberdeen. All the Saturday the Rebels were exceeding careful to prevent any intelligence coming to the McLeods, securing as far as possible all the Avenues coming from the town, and sending out scouts to scour between Kintore and Inverury to the very water-side, these seized Mr. Bartlet an Aberdeen writer who had come along with McLeod and had ventured to Kintore (2 miles from Inverury), where also Mr. Dingwall, an Aberdeen merchant and some others coming with intelligence from Aberdeen were snapt up and carried in prisoners. The McLeods had immediate notice of this, but Culcairn (by whom McLeod was directed as he himself did not pretend to understand military matters) could not be prevailed on to allow any men to come over and drive them off, no doubt fearing as they were strangers in the country lest they should be surprised. But as by this means at length all intelligence stopt, this proved their ruin in the[Pg 138] end. Whereas by keeping some advance guards, or at least sending out patroles now and then, for a mile or two, they might indeed possibly have lost a man or two in Rencountres with the enemy’s parties, and possibly the reverse might have happened, but still they’d have secured the main chance and prevented the whole being surprised. However by this conduct though frequently things of considerable importance were known at Kintore, it was impossible to send the intelligence the remaining two miles. Nevertheless Sir Archibald Grant[360] who had come over the hill from the south, without touching at Aberdeen, and was certainly informed on his way that a reinforcement of French would that night be in town, fell on a way late that night to let McLeod know so much, and this intelligence probably prevented their marching to attack the Rebels the next morning, till they should know their situation more exactly. There was no body more alert or serviceable in getting exact intelligence to the Rebels than Stonnywood, as he knew the country and the people exactly, and as his estate lay betwixt Aberdeen and Inverury, he had all his tenants employed on the same service, so that on Saturday night they had perfect intelligence of everything that concerned the McLeods.

The McLeods combined the two companies under Culkairn at Inverury on Saturday, December 20th, totaling 700 men. Of those, 400 under McLeod were stationed in the town of Inverury, while the rest of Culkairn's two companies were placed in farmers' houses to the northwest of the town, many more than a mile and a half away even though there was no real need for this, since two regiments of the Duke’s army had been in Inverury for weeks without needing to venture far. By nightfall, the Rebel Reinforcements arrived in Aberdeen, consisting of about 150 French Picquets who had stayed at Montrose and over 200 Angus and Mearns Militia, bringing the total to around 1200 men in Aberdeen. All Saturday, the Rebels took great care to stop any information from reaching the McLeods, securing all routes coming from the town and sending out scouts to scour between Kintore and Inverury down to the water’s edge. They captured Mr. Bartlet, an Aberdeen writer who had come with McLeod and dared to go to Kintore (2 miles from Inverury), along with Mr. Dingwall, an Aberdeen merchant, and others bringing news from Aberdeen, who were all taken as prisoners. The McLeods were immediately informed of this, but Culcairn (who was directing McLeod since he didn’t claim to understand military matters) didn’t allow anyone to go after them, likely fearing that as outsiders they could be ambushed. However, as this resulted in all information being cut off, it ultimately led to their downfall. If they had kept some advance guards or at least sent out patrols occasionally for a mile or two, they might have lost a man or two in skirmishes with enemy parties, or the opposite might have happened, but still, they would have secured the main chance and prevented a surprise. Despite knowing significant information at Kintore regularly, it was impossible to send that intelligence the remaining two miles. Nevertheless, Sir Archibald Grant, who had come over the hill from the south without stopping in Aberdeen, had certainly learned on his way that a reinforcement of French troops would be in town that night. Late that night, he found a way to inform McLeod of this, and this warning likely prevented their march to attack the Rebels the next morning until they knew their situation more accurately. No one was more alert or effective in gathering accurate intelligence about the Rebels than Stonnywood, as he knew the area and its people well, and since his estate was between Aberdeen and Inverury, he had all his tenants engaged in that service, so by Saturday night they had complete knowledge of everything concerning the McLeods.

Volunteers

Volunteers

There were some Aberdeen gentlemen who had been either driven from town by the tyranny of the Rebels, or they had been sent on messages to the President, that came all along from Inverness as Volunteers in this expedition: among these were Mr. Forbes of Echt, Mr. Logie a merchant, and Mr. Thomson, General Superviser of Excise, which last gentleman especially was exceeding serviceable both on this, and several other occasions to the Government. The number of volunteers was increased at Inverury by Mr. Maitland, Pitrichy, Mr. Forbes of Shieves, Forbes of Echt, Mr. Chalmers, the now Principal of the King’s College, Mr. Gordon, Professor of Humanity[Pg 139] in the College, some merchants and tradesmen, several students of Divinity and Philosophy and Prentices from both towns of Aberdeen, and many more would have come if it had not been the difficulty of getting out of town. But as McLeod had no spare arms, and the volunteers could get nothing but pistols they proved of no service. Mr. Horn, of Westhall, by promises of great rewards and encouragement, had got his tenants to engage to follow him and join the McLeods, and as he foresaw he could not get fire-arms, had caused make a number of spears with iron heads, for them. But when it came to the push, they all drew back, their hearts failed them and they refused to rise. On which, on Monday he was sending an Express to McLeod for a party to force them out, but his express met them retreating.

There were some gentlemen from Aberdeen who had either been forced out of town by the tyranny of the Rebels or had been sent on messages to the President. They came from Inverness as volunteers for this expedition: among them were Mr. Forbes of Echt, Mr. Logie, a merchant, and Mr. Thomson, General Supervisor of Excise, who was especially helpful to the Government on this and several other occasions. Mr. Maitland, along with others like Mr. Forbes of Shieves, Mr. Chalmers, now the Principal of King’s College, Mr. Gordon, Professor of Humanity in the College, and various merchants, tradesmen, and several divinity and philosophy students as well as apprentices from both towns of Aberdeen, increased the number of volunteers in Inverury. Many more would have joined if it hadn't been for the difficulties in getting out of town. However, since McLeod had no spare weapons and the volunteers could only get pistols, they weren't much help. Mr. Horn of Westhall had convinced his tenants to join him and the McLeods with promises of great rewards and encouragement. Anticipating that he wouldn't be able to get firearms, he had them make a number of spears with iron heads. But when it came to the fight, they all hesitated, lost their nerve, and refused to rise up. So, on Monday, he was sending a messenger to McLeod for a party to force them out, but his messenger met them retreating.

A Detachment sent out

A unit deployed

On Sunday McLeod was prevailed on to send a large detachment of his own company over the water for three miles, which had a very happy effect, driving off all the enemy’s Scouts and facilitating their intelligence, so that they met with no less than three persons from town that had come out in disguises and by byeways who brought letters giving an exact account of the enemy’s numbers and situation, which people otherways would all have been intercepted by their Scouts. This so entirely convinced the Lieutenant that commanded the detachment, of the necessity either of constant patroles, or then of an advance Guard at Kintore, that he had everything settled for one or other, never doubting but his representation would prevail, but there was no convincing Culkairn, so that next day there came not a man over the water at all.

On Sunday, McLeod was persuaded to send a large group from his own company across the water for three miles. This had a very positive effect, driving off all the enemy's scouts and improving their intelligence, allowing them to meet three people from town who had come out in disguises and through back routes. These individuals brought letters detailing the enemy's numbers and situation, which would have otherwise been intercepted by the scouts. This completely convinced the Lieutenant in charge of the detachment of the need for constant patrols or an advance guard at Kintore, so he made arrangements for one or the other, confident that his proposal would be accepted. However, Culkairn was unconvinced, and as a result, no one crossed the water the next day.

The Enemy Alarmed

The Enemy Is Alarmed

The Enemy’s Scouts on being thus driven off, having seen the party but imperfectly, alarmed their friends in town with an account that the whole of the McLeods were marching to attack them, on which they drew[Pg 140] together, but were soon undeceived. The same night after it was dark they convened their men and marched three miles out of town, as if to surprise the enemy, but whether it was only a feint to see if their men would stand by them, or if it was owing to any wrong notion that the McLeods were apprised of them, they returned to town again without doing anything.

The enemy's scouts, after being driven off, only caught a glimpse of the group and freaked out their friends in town, claiming that the whole McLeod clan was coming to attack them. This caused a panic, and they gathered together, only to quickly realize the truth. That same night, once it got dark, they gathered their men and marched three miles out of town, pretending to surprise the enemy. However, it wasn't clear whether it was just a bluff to test their men's loyalty or if they mistakenly believed the McLeods were aware of their movements, but they ended up returning to town without taking any action.

Rebels’ Artifice

Rebels' Trick

This day too, they had tried a strategem to raise a mutiny among the McLeods by bribing a tenant’s son of McLeod’s (who had been staying with a Nonjurant Minister, teaching his children Latin and so had imbibed all the Jacobite notions) to go to Inverury and see to persuade the men that they were engaged in an unjust cause, that their enemies were very numerous and powerful, and that Lord Loudon had purposely sent them up to be cut off in a strange country. As this fellow had their language, was their namesake and countryman, they readily listened to him and it was taking among them like lightening, till the fellow was found out and apprehended, but the impression still stuck to them, till McLeod drew them all out, and very particularly showed them the roguery.

That day too, they had tried a tactic to stir up a revolt among the McLeods by bribing a tenant’s son of McLeod’s (who had been staying with a Nonjurant Minister, teaching his children Latin and had absorbed all the Jacobite ideas) to go to Inverury and try to convince the men that they were fighting for an unjust cause, that their enemies were numerous and strong, and that Lord Loudon had intentionally sent them to be taken out in a foreign land. Since this guy shared their language, had the same name, and was from their area, they listened to him eagerly, and his words spread among them like wildfire, until the guy was found out and caught; however, the impression lingered until McLeod gathered them all together and clearly showed them the trickery.

The Rebels march

The Rebels march

On Monday the 23rd, about 9 of clock in the morning, the Rebels marched from Aberdeen, in order to surprise the McLeods in two columns. The main body being about 900 was commanded by Lord Lewis (though one Major Cuthbert,[361] a French Officer, did all the business), crossed the Bridge of Don, and took a round about and indirect road on the North side of the Don. The other column consisting of their Strathboggy Battallion, and commanded by Major Gordon, a French Officer, and[Pg 141] Avachy, took the high road on the south side of the river. As they had all along guarded the avenues from the town very carefully, they did it now so effectually that there was no possibility of sending any intelligence of their march, till they were actually gone. When they were marching they all along kept advance parties before their main bodies came in sight, so that when they were observed, these parties prevented any persons getting past with information. As the body that marched the high road had by far the nearest way, they halted and concealed themselves in the Church and church-yard of Kinellar about three miles from Inverury, till the corps on the other side were suitably advanced, and meantime had their advanced party concealed in some houses in a low part of the road near Kintore.

On Monday the 23rd, around 9 in the morning, the Rebels marched from Aberdeen to surprise the McLeods in two columns. The main group, about 900 strong, was led by Lord Lewis (though Major Cuthbert, a French officer, handled most of the operations). They crossed the Bridge of Don and took a roundabout route on the north side of the river. The other column, made up of their Strathboggy Battalion and led by Major Gordon, also a French officer, took the main road on the south side of the river. They had been carefully guarding the roads into the town, and they did so effectively now, ensuring there was no way to send word of their march until they were already gone. As they marched, they kept advance parties in front of their main forces, so that when they were spotted, these parties stopped anyone from getting through with information. Since the group on the main road had the quicker route, they halted and hid in the church and churchyard of Kinellar, about three miles from Inverury, until the other column had sufficiently advanced. In the meantime, they had their advance party hidden in some houses in a low area near Kintore.

This party seized the minister of Kintore, who had got some confused notice of their march, and going out for more certain intelligence, and observing nothing on the road, had come that length where he was made prisoner, as also at the very same time were no less than three people with intelligence of the Rebels’ march from the town, who had got out when their Guards were taken off, and escaped the main body by byeways, till being so near Inverury they had (to shorten the way) come in there to the high road, never doubting but they’d have met with some of the McLeods advanced parties to protect them, as those had done that came out the former day. The column that marched on the north side of Don had Scouts concealed among Planting of the Earl of Kintore’s on a rising ground that overlooked Inverury, and though some while before the enemy came up they were observed going backwards and forwards from the Park, and pointed out to McLeod and Culkairn as looking very suspicious, yet by some fatality they neglected to send up and see what they were doing. Immediately as they marched, the minister of Rayne, who happened to be in town, rode out by the Deeside Road, the only one left unguarded, to see if it was possible this way to get before them; but this was so greatly about, and the[Pg 142] road when he came to cross the country so excessively bad that the firing was begun or he reached Kintore. So that the first intelligence they got of them was the Main Body being observed by their sentry, marching down by the Earl of Kintore’s parks within a quarter of a mile of Inverury.

This group captured the minister of Kintore, who had received some unclear information about their approach. He went out to gather more accurate details and, finding nothing on the road, ended up in a spot where he was taken prisoner. At the same time, three other individuals with news of the Rebels' march from the town had slipped away when their Guards were pulled back, avoiding the main group by taking side paths. As they got closer to Inverurie, they decided to join the main road, confident they would encounter some of the McLeods' advance teams for protection, just like those who had come out the day before. The column that marched on the north side of the Don had Scouts hidden among the Earl of Kintore's trees on a hill overlooking Inverurie. Although they were seen moving back and forth from the Park before the enemy arrived, and were pointed out to McLeod and Culkairn as suspicious, they unfortunately didn’t send anyone to check on their activities. As they marched, the minister of Rayne, who happened to be in town, took the Deeside Road—the only one left unguarded—to see if he could get in front of them. However, the distance was considerable, and the condition of the road across the country was so bad that the firing began before he reached Kintore. Thus, the first news they received was that the Main Body was seen by their sentry, marching past the Earl of Kintore’s parks, just a quarter of a mile from Inverurie.

McLeods draw out

McLeods pull out

McLeod, Culkairn, and all the officers with the few men they had in town got together very resolutely, and all of them discovered a great deal of courage on this occasion, nay, to think at all of standing against such superior numbers bespoke no little bravery. And indeed had they thought of sending down a party to line the Church yard of Inverury, and had others rightly posted on a little hull, called the Bass, both which were within a pistol shot of the Boat and Ford of Ury where the Main body behoved to pass, and also on the Ford of Don where Avachy, etc., passed, they certainly had done great execution among them in their passages, and if they had not stopped them altogether, would at least have retarded them till the men that were canton’d at a distance had got up to their assistance, for the Rebels had no cannon, but two old rusty ones they had taken from ships, which got not up till long after the skirmish was over, and though they had, would not probably have done great execution. But the confusion and surprise of the McLeods at the unexpected coming of the enemy made them neglect all these advantages, and stand on the Rigs on the east side at the south end of the town, at almost an equal distance from the Foords of Don and Ury, but at so great a distance as to be able to do execution at neither; and their standing here too was probably not a little owing to their then discovering the other body of the enemy coming upon the other side of Don, which made them irresolute how to dispose of themselves till so many of the Rebels crossed the Ury as put it out of their power to stop their passage there. It was also a vast loss to these Highlanders, who were none[Pg 143] of them disciplined, that they had only firelocks and bayonets, and wanted their darling weapon, the Broadsword, which is always their chief confidence.

McLeod, Culkairn, and all the officers along with the few men they had in town gathered together with determination, and they all found a considerable amount of courage in that moment. The idea of standing against such overwhelming numbers showed no small amount of bravery. In fact, if they had considered sending a group to defend the churchyard in Inverury, and had positioned others correctly on a small hill called the Bass—both of which were within shooting distance of the Boat and Ford of Ury, where the main force had to pass, and also at the Ford of Don, where Avachy and others were crossing—they could have inflicted significant damage during their crossings. Even if they hadn't completely stopped the enemy, they could have at least delayed them until the men stationed at a distance could join them. The Rebels had no artillery except for two old, rusty cannons they had salvaged from ships, which wouldn't arrive until long after the skirmish was over, and even if they had been present, they likely wouldn't have caused much damage. However, the confusion and surprise of the McLeods at the unexpected arrival of the enemy caused them to overlook these opportunities and position themselves on the Rigs on the eastern side at the south end of town, a location that was almost equally distanced from the Fords of Don and Ury but so far away that they couldn't effectively engage either. Their choice to stand there was likely also due to their recognition of another group of enemies approaching from the opposite side of the Don, which left them uncertain about how to position themselves until too many of the Rebels crossed the Ury, making it impossible for them to block that route. It was also a significant disadvantage for these Highlanders, none of whom were trained soldiers, as they only had firelocks and bayonets and were missing their beloved weapon, the Broadsword, which was always their primary source of confidence.

Rebels pass the Foords

Rebels cross the Foords

The van of the Rebels’ main body consisted of the French and some picked men and was lead only by Major Cuthbert, these with all the gentlemen, the volunteers, and some of the common men crossed the Ury, very alertly, and as they passed, drew up behind the Bass, and the Churchyard. But many of their common men ran off and skulked by dike-sides till the action was over and could neither be brought out by threats nor entreaties till then. Major Gordon and Avachy with about 50 or 60 of their men crossed the Don very briskly, and behaved well, but the rest of the Corps took shelter among the Broom, till they saw the event.

The rebel main group included the French and some selected men and was led solely by Major Cuthbert. Along with all the gentlemen, volunteers, and some ordinary soldiers, they crossed the Ury cautiously. As they passed, they took their position behind the Bass and the Churchyard. However, many of their ordinary soldiers ran away and hid by the dikes until the fighting ended, and they couldn’t be persuaded to join in again by either threats or pleas. Major Gordon and Avachy, along with about 50 or 60 of their men, crossed the Don quickly and performed well, but the rest of the group found cover among the Broom until they saw how things turned out.

The action began near an hour after sunset with a clear moonshine, by some passing shots from some ten or twelve of the McLeods who advanced so far, some to the one Foord and some to the other, and fired on the enemy as they were passing and killed two or three men in the water, and immediately retired. The Body that crossed Ury moved up first to attack, but were received with two or three fires from the McLeods, which they returned indeed two for one, but both were at too great a distance to do great execution. But as the party from Don was by this time coming to attack them in flanks, and as the French were advancing with a close regular fire and like to bear very hard on them, the McLeods found themselves unable to stand this shock, and accordingly gave way; yet not so but that a party of them loaded their pieces retiring, and finding some of their men, especially the wounded, like to fall in the enemy’s hands, they wheeled about before they were half way up the town, and made another fire, but immediately ran off. On this the French advanced through the town with an incessant street fire, and the rest divided themselves and went firing up each side of it, being too by this time joined by[Pg 144] most of their skulking companions. After this, as some of the McLeods were running off on the stubble ground on the North end of the town, some person gave a cry that McLeod was taken, on which they turned about again and made another fire but immediately marched off. The Rebels meanwhile being at a considerable distance and not observing them so exactly going off, but seeing a ridge with a few furrows in it, amidst a great deal of unploughed stubble ground, and taking it by the moonlight for a row of men, they fired once or twice into it very successfully. And thus in whole the firing continued for more than twenty minutes. The companies of McLeods and Monroes that were cantonn’d out of the town, had unluckily no Officers with them; these happened to be with McLeod in Inverury, and went out to engage along with the men that were there (which by the bye as there were thirty of them on guard, and many straggling through the country seeking provisions did not much exceed three hundred), these therefore having no body to draw them together, ran up different ways on hearing the firing till they met some of their friends flying, or were informed of the event, and then they ran off. But had their officers been with them to bring them together, and lead them up in a body to meet their friends at the north end of the town and support them, they very possibly might have turned the scale in their favours.

The action started about an hour after sunset under clear moonlight, with a few shots fired by around ten or twelve of the McLeods who moved forward, some to one side and some to the other, and shot at the enemy as they passed, killing two or three men in the water before quickly retreating. The force that crossed Ury moved up first to attack but was met with two or three shots from the McLeods, which they returned at a rate of two to one, but both sides were too far apart for effective damage. As the group from Don approached to flank them and the French advanced with a steady, organized fire that threatened to overwhelm them, the McLeods realized they couldn't withstand the attack and began to withdraw. However, a group of them reloaded their weapons while retreating, and when they found some of their men, especially the wounded, about to fall into enemy hands, they turned around before reaching the outskirts of the town and fired again, but then quickly fled. Following this, the French moved into the town, shooting continuously in the streets, while the others split up and fired down each side of the street, having by this time joined with most of their hiding companions. Later, as some of the McLeods were fleeing across the stubbly ground at the north end of the town, someone shouted that McLeod had been captured, prompting them to turn back and fire again, but they quickly continued their retreat. The Rebels, meanwhile, were at a considerable distance and didn't notice them leave exactly, but seeing a ridge with a few furrows in the moonlight, they mistook it for a line of soldiers and fired into it successfully once or twice. Overall, the shooting carried on for more than twenty minutes. The companies of McLeods and Monroes stationed outside the town unfortunately had no officers with them; they were with McLeod in Inverury, and went out to join the men there, which, by the way, numbered about thirty on guard, with many others wandering through the countryside in search of supplies, totaling no more than three hundred. Since there was no one to gather them, they scattered upon hearing the gunfire, until they encountered some of their fleeing friends or were informed of what was happening, and then they took off. Had their officers been with them to rally them and lead them to join their friends at the north end of the town for support, they might have changed the outcome in their favor.

Loss on both sides

Loss for both sides

The Rebels for a while concealed their loss, but ’tis now generally allowed they had at least ten or twelve killed, several of these French, but all common men. It is indeed generally believed that one of them was a French Officer, as he was put in a grave by himself with several Popish Ceremonies, though not certain. But the Rebels still refuse that it was an Officer. They had also a good many wounded, among whom was Mr Gordon of Birkenbuss, a gentleman of a small estate, very dangerously.

The Rebels kept their losses hidden for a while, but it’s now widely accepted that they had at least ten or twelve killed, several of whom were French, but all were common folks. It's generally believed that one was a French officer since he was buried alone with several Catholic ceremonies, although that's not certain. However, the Rebels still deny that he was an officer. They also had quite a few wounded, including Mr. Gordon of Birkenbuss, a gentleman with a small estate, who was very seriously injured.

The McLeods again had only five killed dead on the spot, which was well known, as their bodies were left exposed for some days or they allowed them to be buried.[Pg 145] One also died of his wounds in the retreat, as did another that was taken prisoner, but they were all common men. About thirty were taken prisoners (many of which were wounded) including ten or twelve Humlys (Colones)[362] that they had picked up. Among the prisoners were Mr. Gordon, Ardvach, Lieutenant of Culkairn’s Company, Mr. Chalmers, Principal of the King’s College, and Mr. Forbes of Echt; McLeod’s own piper, McGrimman,[363] happened also to be taken, and the piper is always looked on as a person of importance in a Highland Chief’s retinue, but McGrimman especially was a respectable person being esteemed the best piper in the Highlands, having had most of the Clan pipers as his scholars, and being looked on by them as a kind of chief, and the veneration they had for him appeared when he was carried prisoner to their army at Stirling, for it is said not a Highland piper would play a tune till McGrimman was allowed to be on his parole, and he himself behaved with so much state that he would play to none of them till their prince himself desired him. Mr. Maitland, Pitrichy, escaped to Keithhall, the house of the Earl of Kintore, the night of[Pg 146] the engagement, where he concealed himself all next day, but unluckily venturing to show himself to Petry, the Sherriff Depute, who intruded himself that night on the Earl, and Mr. Maitland, and he squabbling over drink, Petry not only in violation of the laws of hospitality, and of many obligations he was under to the Earl of Kintore, but also of his own promise to the contrary, basely went off next morning and sent a party of the Rebels who seized him.

The McLeods again had only five killed on the spot, which was well known since their bodies were left exposed for a few days or they were allowed to be buried.[Pg 145] One more died from his wounds during the retreat, and another who was taken prisoner also died, but they were all just common men. About thirty were captured (many of whom were wounded), including ten or twelve Humlys (Colonels)[362] that they had picked up. Among the prisoners were Mr. Gordon of Ardvach, Lieutenant of Culkairn’s Company, Mr. Chalmers, Principal of the King’s College, and Mr. Forbes of Echt; McLeod’s own piper, McGrimman,[363] was also taken, and the piper is always seen as significant in a Highland Chief’s entourage, but McGrimman was particularly respected as he was considered the best piper in the Highlands, having taught most of the Clan pipers, who viewed him as a sort of chief. The respect they had for him was clear when he was taken prisoner to their army at Stirling; it’s said that no Highland piper would play a tune until McGrimman was granted his parole, and he himself carried himself with such dignity that he would only play for those whom their prince himself asked him to. Mr. Maitland of Pitrichy managed to escape to Keithhall, the home of the Earl of Kintore, the night of[Pg 146] the engagement, where he hid the entire next day. Unfortunately, when he ventured to show himself to Petry, the Sheriff Depute, who intruded that night on the Earl and Mr. Maitland, and they ended up arguing over drinks, Petry, not only violating the laws of hospitality and his obligations to the Earl of Kintore but also breaking his own promise, left the next morning and sent a party of Rebels to seize him.

The Rebels do not venture to pursue

The Rebels don’t dare to chase

The McLeods passed the Ury about a quarter of a mile from the town and refreshed themselves at Rayne and Strathboggy, but stopped not a night till they got over Spey, where McLeod waited the coming up of such of his men as had gone other roads, and continued guarding the passes for some while after. But the Rebels were so apprehensive what might be the consequences when for ought they knew, they were joined by the Monroes, etc., that they would not venture to pursue them over the Ury. McLeod lost most of his baggage, but the greater part came not into the Rebels custody but was secreted and pilfered by the townsfolks.

The McLeods passed the Ury about a quarter of a mile from the town and took a break at Rayne and Strathboggy, but didn’t stop for the night until they crossed the Spey, where McLeod waited for his men who had taken different routes to catch up, and continued to guard the passes for a while after. However, the Rebels were so worried about the potential consequences, especially if they were joined by the Monroes, that they didn’t dare to follow them across the Ury. McLeod lost most of his baggage, but most of it didn’t end up in the Rebels' hands; instead, it was hidden and stolen by the townsfolk.

Mr. Horn stress’d

Mr. Horn stressed

As the Rebels were informed of Mr. Horn’s design of joining the McLeods, they were exceeding keen in their resentment against him, and immediately sent a party to seize him, but he luckily had gone out of the way. The party lived a good while at his house at free quarters and made very free with everything, demanding the arms he had made, and the Cess Levy money, but Mr. Horn had left positive orders though they should burn the house to give them neither, and as their Officers had by this time got pretty certain information that their affairs were wrong in England and their Prince retreating, they did not choose in these circumstances to do such a shocking thing. And it was certainly a lucky thing that they got this intelligence to calm them after the flush of their Inverury victory, or then the Fire Order had undoubtedly been put in execution in these counties.

As the Rebels learned about Mr. Horn's plan to join the McLeods, they were extremely angry with him and quickly sent a group to capture him, but he fortunately had gone somewhere else. The group stayed at his house for a while, taking advantage of everything, demanding the weapons he had made and the Cess Levy money. However, Mr. Horn had given strict orders not to give them either, even if they decided to burn the house down. By this time, their officers had gathered reliable information indicating that their situation in England was deteriorating and that their Prince was in retreat, so they didn’t want to commit such a horrific act under the circumstances. It was definitely fortunate for them to receive this news to cool their heads after their victory at Inverury; otherwise, the Fire Order would have surely been carried out in these counties.

[Pg 147]

[Pg 147]

Quartering for Levy Money

Housing for Tax Funds

The towns of Aberdeen having now no relief were obliged to pay their Quota of Levy money, that of the New town amounted to about £500 Sterling. A party of the Clan Chattan (Mclntoshes, Shaws and McGilavrys) under McGilavry of Dunmaglass, being now come up from Dundee to support their friends in Aberdeen in case of a straight, these for the greater terror were employed as far as possible for quartering in the gentlemen’s houses in the country for the Levy money. But the Rebels finding it would take longer time to get people forced to give the whole of their exorbitant demands than they could bestow, as they foresaw that in a week or so they must march to reinforce their friends in the South, they were therefore willing to compound the matter and take half in hand, and a bill for the other half payable at Candlemass, and in this way they gathered in a good deal of money. But still there were several gentlemen stood out for a good while under all the hardships they imposed, especially Mr. Leith of Freefield (whom they also kept a while Prisoner), Mr. Patan of Grandsam, and Mr. Burnet of Kemnay. Mr. Burnet’s zeal for our constitution, and the endeavours he used to awaken the British spirit among his neighbours, had rendered him excessively obnoxious to the Rebels, they hunted him for some weeks from place to place, to seize him, but he at length got to Edinburgh, where he was obliged to stay till his Royal Highness marched for Aberdeen.

The towns of Aberdeen, now without any relief, had to pay their share of the levy money, which for the New Town was about £500 Sterling. A group from Clan Chattan (Mclntoshes, Shaws, and McGilavrys) led by McGilavry of Dunmaglass had come up from Dundee to support their friends in Aberdeen in case of an emergency. To create more fear, they were assigned to stay in the gentlemen's houses in the countryside for the levy money. However, the rebels realized it would take too long to force people to meet all their excessive demands, especially since they needed to march to support their friends in the South within a week. So, they agreed to take half of the amount upfront and a promissory note for the other half due by Candlemass. This way, they managed to collect a considerable amount of money. Still, several gentlemen resisted for quite a while despite all the hardships, especially Mr. Leith of Freefield (who was also held prisoner for a while), Mr. Patan of Grandsam, and Mr. Burnet of Kemnay. Mr. Burnet's strong commitment to our constitution and his efforts to inspire a British spirit among his neighbors made him very unpopular with the rebels. They hunted him for weeks, trying to capture him, but he eventually made it to Edinburgh, where he had to stay until his Royal Highness marched to Aberdeen.

Rebels called up

Rebels summoned

The resolute delays of some few gentlemen, and the great number they had to quarter upon, made it impracticable for the Rebels to collect their Levy money from much more than one half of these counties, before they were called up and obliged to march and reinforce their friends in the South, so that almost all Buchan, and most of the more remote estates in both Banff and Aberdeenshire escaped at this time.

The determined delays of a few gentlemen, along with the large number of people they had to support, made it impossible for the Rebels to gather their Levy money from more than about half of these counties before they were summoned and had to march to reinforce their allies in the South, which meant that almost all of Buchan and most of the more distant estates in both Banff and Aberdeenshire got away without being affected this time.

[Pg 148]

[Pg 148]

Elsick’s Men, and McGregors come to Aberdeen

Elsick's Men and the McGregors arrive in Aberdeen

Soon after Lord Lewis marched up with the whole of the Rebels from this country, there arrived a Spanish ship at Peterhead with arms and money, which brought a party of Elsick’s[364] men from the Mearns to possess Aberdeen and bring up this loading; but they being looked on as weak, a party of the McGregors joined them. None of these parties however ventured to the country but only while they were bringing up their cargo from Peterhead. Lord Lewis had been abundantly arbitrary in his Government, Horses and Arms had been everywhere seized throughout the counties, under the pretence of searching for arms; in houses both in town and country many things had been pilfered with impunity, and he himself treated everybody with a great deal of insolence, but all this was but a jest in comparison with these McGregors. They went to people’s houses through the town and always behaved so very rudely as to make them forced to give them money to go away. They would stop gentlemen on the streets openly, and either take their silver buckles and buttons from them, or oblige them to give so much to redeem them. Without the least provocation they would beat and abuse people; and whenever they took it into their heads to enquire about any gentlemen’s principles they met with, they came up with their broadswords drawn and asked what King they were for? If they hesitated the least in answering ‘King James,’ they were sure of a slap, and never got away till they sat down on their knees and swore to the Pretender, and cursed King George in any terms the ruffians pleased. But happily they soon went off with the arms and left Elsick’s men only to guard the town. These continued mostly till the retreat of their army and behaved pretty civilly; indeed though they had inclined to do otherwise, yet the town’s people not being under so much restraint as formerly, began to show themselves so keenly,[Pg 149] that they made them glad to be peaceable, for fear of their being mobbed.

Soon after Lord Lewis marched up with all the Rebels from this country, a Spanish ship arrived at Peterhead with weapons and money, bringing a group of Elsick’s men from the Mearns to take control of Aberdeen and transport this cargo. However, since they were seen as weak, a group of McGregors joined them. None of these groups ventured far into the countryside; they only stayed while they collected their cargo from Peterhead. Lord Lewis had been very unreasonable in his leadership. Horses and weapons were seized throughout the counties under the pretense of searching for arms; in both towns and rural areas, many items were stolen without punishment, and he treated everyone with a lot of arrogance, but all this was nothing compared to the behavior of the McGregors. They went through the town, acting so rudely that people were forced to pay them off to leave. They would stop gentlemen in the streets, openly taking their silver buckles and buttons or demanding money to give them back. Without any provocation, they would beat and insult people; whenever they decided to question anyone about their loyalties, they would approach with their broadswords drawn and ask which King they supported. If anyone hesitated to say ‘King James,’ they would get hit and wouldn’t be let go until they knelt and swore loyalty to the Pretender while cursing King George in whatever harsh language the ruffians chose. Fortunately, they soon left with the weapons, leaving only Elsick’s men to guard the town. These men mostly stayed until their army retreated and behaved relatively well; indeed, even though they might have wanted to act differently, the townspeople, no longer under as much restraint, began to show themselves openly, which made the soldiers eager to keep the peace for fear of being mobbed.

Rebels retreat from Stirling

Rebels pull back from Stirling

The whole Rebel Army, except the Clans that went the Highland road with their Prince, passed through Aberdeenshire on their retreat from Stirling. They marched in two columns (the clans making a third), Lord Lewis Gordon’s men, the Deeside men, Glenbucket’s men and some other body’s forming one column and marching in the high road to Strathboggy. The rest of their army formed another column and marched with such baggages as they had got off from Stirling, or the Clans had left them, through the town of Aberdeen. They were commanded by Lord George Murray and consisted mostly of the Athole Brigade, French, Lord Ogilvies men,[365] Cromarty’s, Kilmarnock’s, Kelly’s,[366] Elsick’s, Lifeguards, Hussars, and all their other Lowland Corps. They stayed but short while in Aberdeen and so had not great opportunity of doing much mischief, though they seemed not at all averse to do it. For the ill situation of their affairs and their marching in such cold stormy weather, put them in a great fret. They threatened dreadful things against they should return Conquerors, particularly against the Clergy of the Church of Scotland, on which subject none was more violent than Lord John Drummond, who once and again proposed the hanging of some of them for examples; and indeed the Clergy were so sensible of their danger, that if the Duke had been obliged to retreat again, most of them had resolved to prepare to leave the country. They divided at Aberdeen and marched to Spey, some by Old Meldrum and Banff and some by Inverury and Strathboggy. At Speyside they all joined and met there[Pg 150] with the other column. There was a good deal of pilfering by their stragglers in this march, but when the country people had the resolution to oppose them, they behaved very cowardly. The minister of Clate[367] in particular and a few of his parishioners unarmed, took the guns and bayonets from two Strathboggy men who fired on the people for finding fault with their robbing a dyeing woman of her bedclothes.

The entire Rebel Army, except for the Clans that took the Highland route with their Prince, passed through Aberdeenshire while retreating from Stirling. They marched in two columns (with the clans making a third), as Lord Lewis Gordon’s men, the Deeside men, Glenbucket’s men, and others formed one column, heading along the main road to Strathboggy. The rest of their army formed another column, moving through the town of Aberdeen with whatever supplies they had salvaged from Stirling or that the Clans had left for them. They were led by Lord George Murray and were mostly made up of the Athole Brigade, French troops, Lord Ogilvie’s men, Cromarty’s, Kilmarnock’s, Kelly’s, Elsick’s, Lifeguards, Hussars, and all their other Lowland troops. They spent only a short time in Aberdeen and thus had little chance to cause much trouble, although they certainly didn't seem opposed to it. The dire state of their situation and the harsh, cold weather made them very agitated. They threatened severe consequences for when they returned as victors, particularly targeting the Clergy of the Church of Scotland, with none being more extreme than Lord John Drummond, who repeatedly suggested hanging some of them as examples. Indeed, the Clergy were very aware of their peril, and if the Duke had been forced to retreat again, most had planned to flee the country. They split up in Aberdeen and marched towards Spey, some taking the route through Old Meldrum and Banff, while others went through Inverury and Strathboggy. At Speyside, they all regrouped and connected with the other column. There was quite a bit of looting by their stragglers during the march, but when local people stood up to resist them, the rebels acted very cowardly. The minister of Clate, in particular, along with a few of his unarmed parishioners, took the guns and bayonets from two Strathboggy men who fired on them for criticizing their robbery of a woman’s bedclothes.

Hussars and Stonnywood’s men left in Aberdeen

Hussars and Stonnywood’s men left in Aberdeen

Stonnywood’s men though they had marched so far in the Highroad, yet came off from the rest of their corps and marched down by Deeside to Aberdeen, where they remained after the main body had left it, along with the Hussars under one Colonel Baggot,[368] a French Officer, and a very rough sort of man and so exceeding well fitted to command the Banditti of which that Corps was composed, and to distress a country. The Lord Lieutenant was along with their Prince, so Lonmay, the Depute Governor, had the chief direction, though both he and Stonnywood pretended that most of the extravagant things done by the Hussars, was owing to Baggot. They immediately fell to work to collect the remains of the Levy money. And now they had a new contrivance to force it. These fellows, the Hussars, went galloping about, and seized the gentlemen that were refractory, or their factor, or then the principal tenants, if none of the former could be found, and brought them in prisoners to Stonnywood and Baggot, the last of whom was sure to use them very roughly. But most of the gentlemen absconded, and some of the few they got stood out against all their bad usage, as particularly Mr. Innes, Factor to the Earl of Kintore. The Tenants which they seized had not the money to give so they were obliged at length to[Pg 151] let them go and made but very little of this method. The Hussars were vastly rude and expensive wherever they went, and failed not to pick up any horses as they come along that were remaining. But for all their roughness, people that would venture to stand their ground, would sometimes get the better of them. One instance of which was at New Dear when two of them armed with pistols were taking a gentleman’s horse and money, the minister of the place[369] being only with the gentleman, and both of them only with staves in their hands; the minister first knocked down one of the fellows and the gentleman the other, and disarmed them both and set them off.

Stonnywood's men, even though they had marched quite a distance on the Highroad, separated from the rest of their unit and traveled down Deeside to Aberdeen. They stayed there after the main group left, alongside the Hussars led by Colonel Baggot, a French officer who was a rough character and very well suited to lead the Banditti that made up that Corps, causing trouble for the locals. The Lord Lieutenant was with their Prince, so Lonmay, the Deputy Governor, had the main responsibility, though both he and Stonnywood claimed that most of the outrageous actions of the Hussars were due to Baggot. They immediately got to work gathering the leftovers of the Levy money. They came up with a new scheme to force it. The Hussars rode around, capturing any gentlemen who resisted, or their factors, or the main tenants if none of them could be found, and brought them back as prisoners to Stonnywood and Baggot, who would treat them very harshly. However, many gentlemen managed to escape, and some of those they captured stood up against their mistreatment, especially Mr. Innes, the factor for the Earl of Kintore. The tenants who were seized didn’t have the money to pay, so eventually, they had to let them go and didn’t gain much from this tactic. The Hussars were extremely rude and demanding wherever they went, and they didn’t hesitate to grab any horses they found along the way. But despite their roughness, people who dared to stand up to them sometimes managed to outsmart them. One example was at New Dear when two of them, armed with pistols, were trying to take a gentleman’s horse and money. The local minister, who was only with the gentleman and both were armed only with sticks, first knocked down one of the men, and the gentleman took down the other, disarming both of them and sending them off.

Some of Fitzjames Dragoons land

Some of Fitzjames Dragoons arrive

The Saturday before his Royal Highness came to town, a French ship landed some of the Dragoons of Fitzjames’ Regiment at Aberdeen with their riding furniture.[370] There had come afore about the same time another French ship with the money for the Pretender’s use, but the Master thought it dangerous to land it at Aberdeen as the Duke was so near, and so sailed about for Peterhead where it was received by Lonmay.[371] Fitzjames’ Dragoons marched off next day, as did also Stonnywood and his men with the Hussars, and thus the town of Aberdeen at length got free of the Rebel Government, after it had been about five months subject to it.

The Saturday before His Royal Highness arrived in town, a French ship unloaded some of Fitzjames’ Regiment Dragoons at Aberdeen along with their riding gear.[370] Around the same time, another French ship brought money for the Pretender, but the Captain thought it was too risky to offload it at Aberdeen since the Duke was nearby, so he sailed around to Peterhead where it was received by Lonmay.[371] Fitzjames’ Dragoons left the next day, as did Stonnywood and his men with the Hussars, and after about five months under Rebel control, the town of Aberdeen was finally free.

Duke of Cumberland comes to Aberdeen

Duke of Cumberland arrives in Aberdeen

The Tuesday thereafter General Bland arrived in town with the van of the Army under the Duke of Cumberland,[Pg 152] and his Royal Highness on the Thursday thereafter. The Burgesses lined the streets all the way from the Duke’s entry into the town to his lodgings. He was immediately waited on by the nobility and gentry of town and county, and next day by the Colleges and Clergy who had assembled in a Synod pro re nata and had all the honour to kiss his hand. Mr. Osborne, Principal of the Marischal College, made a short congratulary speech to his Highness in name of the colleges, as did Mr. Theodore Gordon, Moderator of the Synod in name of the Clergy, and both had gracious returns.

The following Tuesday, General Bland arrived in town with the Army led by the Duke of Cumberland,[Pg 152] and his Royal Highness followed on the Thursday after. The local Burgesses lined the streets from the Duke’s entrance into town all the way to his lodgings. He was quickly greeted by the nobility and gentry from both town and county, and the next day, the Colleges and Clergy, who had gathered in a special Synod, had the honor of kissing his hand. Mr. Osborne, Principal of Marischal College, delivered a brief congratulatory speech to his Highness on behalf of the colleges, as did Mr. Theodore Gordon, Moderator of the Synod, representing the Clergy, and both received gracious responses.

More of Fitzjames’ Dragoons land in Buchan

More of Fitzjames' Dragoons arrive in Buchan

Soon after this another of the Transports with Fitzjames’ Dragoons having got information on the coast, of the Duke’s being at Aberdeen, landed in Buchan[372] and then very narrowly escaped from the Duke’s Picquets who were ordered out to intercept them.

Soon after that, another transport with Fitzjames’ Dragoons received word on the coast that the Duke was in Aberdeen, landed in Buchan[372] and then narrowly avoided being caught by the Duke’s picquets who had been sent out to intercept them.

Lord Ancrum[373] marches to Curgaff

Lord Ancrum[373] heads to Curgaff

As to Lord Ancrum’s expedition to Curgaff, a house belonging to Forbes of Skeleter in Strathdon (vid. London Gazette, March 11th), Glenbucket was then with a few men within a few miles of Strathdon. But his numbers were greatly magnified, and his being actually at hand was so artfully insinuated to a minister’s wife in the neighbourhood, that with the honestest intention in the world, she gave a false alarm which made his Lordship in such a hurry that though he destroyed the powder, yet he only scattered the ball, broke a few of the arms, and carried off a very few, the rest falling all into the hands of the country people. And yet one might imagine that, as his dragoons were not to gallop off and[Pg 153] leave the Foot, there had been no miss in making them dismount and walk for a few miles and loading their horses with the Arms, till they should come to some place where country horses might have been got.

Regarding Lord Ancrum’s mission to Curgaff, a property owned by Forbes of Skeleter in Strathdon (see London Gazette, March 11th), Glenbucket was then a few miles away from Strathdon with a small group of men. However, his numbers were greatly exaggerated, and his presence was cleverly suggested to a minister’s wife nearby, which led her, with the best intentions, to raise a false alarm. This caused his Lordship to rush, and although he destroyed the powder, he only scattered the balls, damaged a few arms, and took only a couple with him, leaving the rest to the local people. One might think that since his dragoons weren’t set to gallop away and leave the infantry, it would have made sense to have them dismount and walk for a few miles while loading their horses with the arms until they reached a place where they could get local horses.

Bland[374] at Old Meldrum

Bland[374] in Old Meldrum

When part of the army under General Bland advanced to Old Meldrum, Barrels and Price’s under Lieutenant Rich[375] lay at Inverury which is on the ordinary Post Road to Strathboggy (where about 3000 of the Rebels under Roy Stuart were with the Hussars) and about 100 Grants that came to escort their Laird to Aberdeen[376] formed an advance guard on this road, as the Campbells did from Old Meldrum, where they were very alert and watchful, so that the Rebels never once offered to disturb either the Generals or Lieut. Rich’s Quarters. And indeed if they had, all possible care was taken to give them a warm reception. There was a bridge of boats thrown over the Ury on the road from Inverury to Old Meldrum, and a Guard midway betwixt the two Garrisons who could observe a blaze in the night time at either of them or anything happening extraordinary, and by a blaze could give information of it to the other, and the Light Horse, too, were quartered betwixt so as to form a line of communication.

When part of the army under General Bland moved toward Old Meldrum, Barrels and Price’s unit led by Lieutenant Rich were stationed at Inverury, which is on the usual route to Strathboggy (where about 3000 Rebels under Roy Stuart were with the Hussars) and around 100 Grants who came to escort their Laird to Aberdeen formed an advance guard on this road, just like the Campbells did from Old Meldrum, where they remained very alert and watchful, ensuring that the Rebels never attempted to disrupt either the Generals’ or Lieutenant Rich’s quarters. In fact, if they had, every possible measure was in place to give them a warm reception. There was a bridge of boats set up over the Ury on the road from Inverury to Old Meldrum, and a guard positioned midway between the two garrisons who could see a fire at either location at night or anything unusual occurring. A fire could be used to signal the other garrison, and the Light Horse were also stationed in between to establish a line of communication.

Rebels attempt to surprise the Grants

Rebels try to catch the Grants off guard

The night before General Bland marched for Strathboggy, the Grants came first to the Kirk Town of Clate, which is about six miles south of Strathboggy and off from the high road to Aberdeen. As there were many[Pg 154] disaffected people thereabouts, the Rebels at Huntly had notice of it that night, though it was late before they came there, and they immediately formed a scheme of surprising him next morning. But Grant, suspecting such a thing might be done, wisely advanced a mile further the same night to Castle Forbes, a house belonging to Lord Forbes, and by the strength of its old walls alone not easily to be taken without cannon, so that next morning when the Rebels under Roy Stuart missed them at Clate, they returned without meddling with the Castle.

The night before General Bland marched to Strathboggy, the Grants first arrived at the Kirk Town of Clate, which is about six miles south of Strathboggy and off the main road to Aberdeen. Since there were many discontented people in the area, the Rebels at Huntly found out about it that night, even though it was late when they got there, and they quickly came up with a plan to surprise him the next morning. However, Grant, suspecting this might happen, wisely moved on another mile that night to Castle Forbes, a house belonging to Lord Forbes, which wasn’t easy to capture due to its strong old walls that would require cannon to breach. So, when the Rebels under Roy Stuart found them missing at Clate the next morning, they decided not to mess with the Castle.

Bland marches to Huntly

Bland walks to Huntly

Meantime General Bland had kept his orders for marching that morning so very closely that the Rebels had not got the least intelligence of it. The two corps from Inverury and Old Meldrum met at Rayne, and had it not been for a small accident, had intercepted the Rebels who were on the Clate Expedition and got to Strathboggy before them. For they, dreaming of no such thing, breakfasted very leisurely at Clate and stopped also at a public house betwixt it and Huntly. There was an exceeding great fog on the Hill of the Foudline, so that some senseless, idle people that were running up before the army, imagined that a plough that was going in the midst among some houses on the side of the hill, was a party of men; on which they gave the alarm that the Rebels were at hand, this was immediately forwarded by the liger Ladys[377] with a deal of consternation, so that some people of better sense gave credit to it and came up to the General with this false alarm. Whatever might be in it, he judged it safest for the men to halt and form, while proper persons were sent up to see what the matter was, who soon found out the mistake. But this trifle occasioned a stop for near half an hour or three quarters, and the Rebels were scarce so long in Strathboggy before the General came there.

Meantime, General Bland had kept his marching orders that morning so tightly under wraps that the Rebels had no clue about it. The two corps from Inverury and Old Meldrum met at Rayne, and if it hadn't been for a small mishap, they would have intercepted the Rebels, who were on the Clate Expedition, and reached Strathboggy before them. The Rebels, thinking nothing of it, had a leisurely breakfast at Clate and also stopped at a pub between there and Huntly. There was a thick fog on the Hill of the Foudline, so some foolish, idle people running ahead of the army mistook a plough in a yard for a group of men. They spread the word that the Rebels were approaching, and this was quickly relayed by the local Ladys[377] with considerable panic, leading some more sensible folks to believe it and approach the General with this false alarm. Regardless of its validity, he decided it was safest for the troops to stop and form up while some appropriate individuals were sent to check on the situation, who quickly discovered the mistake. However, this little incident caused a delay of nearly half an hour to three-quarters, and the Rebels barely spent that long in Strathboggy before the General arrived.

[Pg 155]

[Pg 155]

The Enemy knew nothing of them till they came within sight of Strathboggy. They had but just come there, and ordered dinner, but they thought proper to leave it in a great hurry on Bland’s approach. Their Hussars and some gentlemen on horseback brought up the rear. Among these last, was Hunter of Burnside,[378] who for a good way kept within speech of the party under Major Crawford and the volunteers that pursued them; but managed his horse with so much dexterity, turning so oft and so nimbly, that they could not aim at him rightly; at length one of the Campbells shot so near him as made him start aside and gallop off, and as the forces took him for Roy Stuart, this gave occasion to the story of that gentleman being either killed or wounded. The soldiers were incensed, and not unjustly with a notion that Strathboggy was extremely disaffected: coming in to it therefore under this impression after a long march in a bitter bad rainy day, it was no surprise that they used some freedom with a few peoples houses, who, conscious of their own demerit, had locked their doors and run off, leaving nobody to care for the soldiers that were to quarter in them.

The Enemy had no idea about them until they reached Strathboggy. They had just arrived and ordered dinner, but decided to leave in a hurry when they saw Bland approaching. Their Hussars and some gentlemen on horseback were trailing behind. Among those was Hunter of Burnside, who managed to stay in contact with Major Crawford and the volunteers chasing them; however, he skillfully maneuvered his horse, turning quickly enough that they couldn't aim at him properly. Eventually, one of the Campbells shot so close that he had to dodge and gallop away. Since the forces mistook him for Roy Stuart, this led to rumors that the gentleman was either killed or injured. The soldiers were understandably angry, believing Strathboggy was very hostile. So, after a long march on a dreadful rainy day, it was hardly surprising that they took liberties with a few people's houses. Those residents, aware of their own shortcomings, locked their doors and fled, leaving no one to attend to the soldiers who were supposed to stay there.

Captain Campbell surprised at Keith[379]

Captain Campbell shocked at Keith__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Next day the General sent up seventy Campbells, and 30 Light Horse to Keith, a little town six miles from Huntly, and half way betwixt it and Fochabers where the Rebels had retired. One Alexander Campbell, a Lieutenant, had the command, who had been all along[Pg 156] very alert on the advanced guard and had met with no check, though oft in as dangerous a situation, but next night had the misfortune to have his party surprised. This was chiefly owing to the dissaffection of the inhabitants, who conducted the Rebels at dead of night, not by any set road, but through the fields so as not to meet with the Patroles, and then having fetched a compass about, and entering the town on the south, by the way from Huntly, were mistaken by the Sentrys, to whose calls they answered in a friendly way, for a reinforcement they had some expectation of. The Guard was conveniently posted in the Church and church yard which was very fencible, and the Lieutenant, who had not thrown off his clothes, on the first alarm ran out and fought his way into them, and behaved very gallantly with his guard for a while. But the rest of his men, being mostly all taken asleep, and having himself received several wounds, he was at last obliged to surrender. The enemy suffered considerably, but carried off their slain, so that their numbers were not known. The Lieutenant was left a while with only one Sentry to guard him, on which he very resolutely grappled with him, disarmed him and got off; but being retarded by his wounds he was soon retaken and then they hashed him miserably and left him for dead; yet he afterwards recovered.

The next day, the General sent seventy Campbells and thirty Light Horse to Keith, a small town six miles from Huntly and halfway between it and Fochabers, where the Rebels had retreated. A Lieutenant named Alexander Campbell was in charge, and he had been very alert on the front lines without facing any setbacks, even when in dangerous situations. However, that night, his party was surprised. This mainly happened because the locals were untrustworthy; they guided the Rebels at night, not along any main roads but through the fields to avoid the patrols. They then managed to circle around and enter the town from the south, coming from Huntly. The sentries mistook them for a reinforcements they were expecting and responded to them in a friendly manner. The Guard was positioned conveniently in the church and its yard, which was very defensible. The Lieutenant, who hadn’t taken off his clothes, rushed out at the first alarm and fought his way into the group, behaving bravely with his guard for a time. However, most of his men were asleep, and after sustaining several wounds himself, he was eventually forced to surrender. The enemy suffered significant losses but took their dead with them, so their numbers weren’t clear. The Lieutenant was briefly left with only one sentry to guard him, and he aggressively fought that sentry, disarmed him, and managed to escape. However, slowed down by his injuries, he was quickly recaptured. They treated him brutally and left him for dead, but he later recovered.

Popish and Nonjurant Meetings destroyed

Catholic and Nonjuror Gatherings ended

His Royal Highness on coming to Aberdeen immediately stopped all the Nonjurant Ministers, and soon after ordered their Meeting Houses and the Mass Houses to be destroyed, which was accordingly executed both in town and country as the Army marched along, and indeed none were surprised at this piece of discipline, as these houses were not only illegal, but had in fact proved such Nurseries of Rebellion. The Priests had mostly gone off, and such as could be got were seized and confined, but neither ministers nor people of the Nonjurants met with any other disturbance unless they were otherways concerned[Pg 157] in the Rebellion. The Army also had orders to seize the Corn, Horses, and cattle and Arms belonging to those in the Rebellion, but to touch none of their other effects, and the generality of the Rebels had foreseen this and either sold or sent off these things, so that there were but few that suffered much in this way. If any parties of soldiers used further freedom in these houses, which was not oft, the Duke, on complaint made, not only obliged the Officers to be at pains to recover the plundered effects from the soldiers, but generally gave a compliment himself to make up the loss; as particularly to Mrs. Gordon, Cupbairdy,[380] he ordered £100 Sterling. His protections were easily obtained till a piece of the Rebels extravagance not only made this more difficult, but also obliged his Royal Highness to recall some protections he had granted, and gave up some houses to be plundered.

His Royal Highness arrived in Aberdeen and immediately stopped all the Nonjurant Ministers, then soon ordered their Meeting Houses and Mass Houses to be destroyed, which happened as the Army marched through both the town and the countryside. No one was surprised by this action, as these houses were not only illegal but had also been known to promote rebellion. Most of the Priests had fled, and those who could be captured were seized and imprisoned, but neither the ministers nor the Nonjurant people faced any other trouble unless they were involved in the rebellion in some way[Pg 157]. The Army was also instructed to seize corn, horses, cattle, and arms belonging to those in the rebellion, but not to take anything else from them. Most of the Rebels anticipated this and either sold or moved their possessions, so very few suffered significant losses. If any groups of soldiers acted with too much liberty in these houses, which didn’t happen often, the Duke, upon receiving complaints, made the Officers work to recover the stolen items from the soldiers and typically offered compensation himself to cover the losses; for example, he ordered £100 Sterling for Mrs. Gordon, Cupbairdy.[380] It was easy to obtain his protections until an act of the Rebels made this more complicated, forcing His Royal Highness to recall some protections he had issued and allowing some houses to be looted.

Cullon House plundered by the Rebels

Cullon House looted by the Rebels

The Earl of Findlater was at Aberdeen attending his Royal Highness, when his factor gave him notice that the Rebels who were thereabouts had intimated, that if the Cess and Levy money for his Lordships Estate was not paid against such a day, his house at Cullon would peremptorily be plundered. This intimation the Earl showed to his Royal Highness, who ordered him in return to certify them that if they took such a step, it would oblige him to alter his conduct, recall his protections and give up their houses to be plundered. Notwithstanding this threat, the Rebels actually pillaged Cullon House[381] at the time appointed, and his Royal Highness was in consequence obliged to withdraw his protections from Lady Gordon of Park,[380] and Lady Dunbar of Durn,[380] for their houses; and indeed the last of these suffered considerably, but most of the effects were carried off from Park that were of any value.

The Earl of Findlater was in Aberdeen with his Royal Highness when his agent informed him that the Rebels nearby had announced that if the tax and levy money for his estate wasn't paid by a certain date, they would definitely raid his house at Cullon. The Earl showed this notice to his Royal Highness, who instructed him to let them know that if they went through with it, he would have to change his approach, revoke his protections, and allow their houses to be looted. Despite this warning, the Rebels actually raided Cullon House at the appointed time, and as a result, his Royal Highness had to withdraw his protections from Lady Gordon of Park and Lady Dunbar of Durn for their houses. In fact, the latter suffered significant damage, while most valuable items were taken from Park.

[Pg 158]

[Pg 158]

Thornton Disgusted

Thornton Is Disgusted

The famous Squire Thornton[382] who had raised the Yorkshire Company, his Lieutenant Mr. Crofts, and Ensign Mr. Symson, Minister at Fala (who had been both taken prisoners at Falkirk), had come as volunteers with the Army to Aberdeen, though they had never met with very civil usage from the regular officers who seemed not at all to affect volunteers. When Pultney’s Regiment was ordered from Old Meldrum to Buchan on a command one day, these gentlemen who declined no fatigue, and had usually joined that corps, marched along. But coming the first night to a little village called Ellon, the Quarter[Pg 159] Master would not assign Quarters to the volunteers as Officers, and none of the Officers would give orders for it, which and some other things of this kind effectually disgusted them, so that they immediately left the army and returned home. His Royal Highness in order to preserve the town of Aberdeen from any surprise after he should leave it caused fortify Gordon’s Hospital and placed a garrison in it under Captain Crosby, and in honour of the Duke it was called Fort Cumberland.

The well-known Squire Thornton[382], who had raised the Yorkshire Company, along with his Lieutenant Mr. Crofts and Ensign Mr. Symson, the Minister at Fala (who had both been captured at Falkirk), joined the Army as volunteers in Aberdeen, despite not receiving very respectful treatment from the regular officers, who clearly had no regard for volunteers. When Pultney’s Regiment was ordered from Old Meldrum to Buchan on a mission one day, these gentlemen, who didn’t shy away from hard work and usually joined that unit, marched along. However, upon arriving the first night at a small village called Ellon, the Quartermaster refused to assign quarters to the volunteers as officers, and none of the officers would give orders for it. This, along with a few other such incidents, thoroughly annoyed them, leading them to leave the army and return home immediately. His Royal Highness, to protect the town of Aberdeen from any unexpected attacks after his departure, had Gordon’s Hospital fortified and stationed a garrison there under Captain Crosby. In honor of the Duke, it was named Fort Cumberland.

Duke marches from Aberdeen on Foot

Duke walks from Aberdeen on foot

When the Duke marched from Aberdeen[383] he endeared himself exceedingly to the soldiers (if it was possible to increase their affection for him) by walking most of the way with them on foot, generally using one of the soldiers Tenttrees for a staff and never going a yard out of the way for a bridge or any burn they met with, but wading through at the nearest.

When the Duke marched from Aberdeen[383] he won over the soldiers even more (if that was possible) by walking most of the way with them on foot, usually using one of the soldier’s Tenttrees as a walking stick and never taking a detour for a bridge or any stream they came across, but instead just wading through at the closest point.

On a long march of near 20 miles from Old Meldrum to Banff the following little accident much delighted the spectators. A soldiers wife carrying a young child, grew quite faint and entreated her husband, who was near with the Duke, to carry the child for a little way; the fellow said he could not as he was burdened with his arms. The Duke overheard, took the soldier’s gun and carried it himself for some way and ordered him to ease the poor woman of the child for a while.

On a long march of nearly 20 miles from Old Meldrum to Banff, the following little accident greatly entertained the spectators. A soldier's wife, carrying a young child, became quite faint and begged her husband, who was near the Duke, to carry the child for a short distance; the soldier replied that he couldn’t because he was loaded down with his weapon. The Duke overheard this, took the soldier's gun, and carried it for a while himself, then ordered the soldier to help the poor woman by taking the child for a bit.

Rebels not expecting his March

Rebels not expecting his arrival

The Duke being stopped so long at Aberdeen, made his march at length as great a surprise on the Rebels as if he had not halted a day, for by this time they were grown very secure. The Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Roy Stuart, etc., were all lodged in the minister’s house of Speymouth, and had more than 2000 men along with them. They were sitting very securely after breakfast, when a country man came over the River in great haste[Pg 160] and told them that the Enzie was all in a ‘vermine of Red Quites.’[384] But they were so averse to believe it, that when they ran to an eminence and observed them at a great distance they swore it was only muck heaps: the man said it might be so, but he never saw Muck heaps moving before. And after they were convinced it was a body of men, still they would only have it to be some of Bland’s parties, till their Hussars, whom they had sent over to reconnoitre, returned and assured them the whole Army under his Royal Highness was coming up.

The Duke, having stayed in Aberdeen for so long, surprised the Rebels as much as if he hadn’t paused at all, because by that point they had become quite complacent. The Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Roy Stuart, and others were all staying in the minister’s house in Speymouth, with over 2,000 men with them. They were sitting comfortably after breakfast when a local man hurried across the river and told them that the Enzie was filled with a "vermine of Red Quites." But they were so unwilling to believe it that when they ran to a high point and saw them from a distance, they insisted it was just dirt piles. The man replied that it might look that way, but he had never seen dirt piles moving before. Even after they realized it was a group of soldiers, they still insisted it was just some of Bland’s parties, until their Hussars, whom they had sent out to scout, came back and confirmed that the whole Army under his Royal Highness was approaching.

Duke crosses the Spey

Duke crosses the Spey

As to the Duke’s passing the Spey (vid. London Gazette, April 19th):—The Soldiers had got a notion that all on the other side Spey were rank Rebels, and so immediately seized a number of the sheep and other cattle as soon as they got over. But as the case was quite otherways and the people of that Parish had been longing for the Army as their deliverers, on the minister’s representing this, and what had happened, to his Royal Highness, he immediately ordered all to be restored that could be got unkilled, and gave the minister £50 Ster. to divide among the people for their loss, and if that did not do it directed him to demand whatever would, and it should be ordered. His Royal Highness took up his quarters in the minister’s, where the Duke of Perth, etc., had been but a few hours before.

Regarding the Duke crossing the Spey (see London Gazette, April 19th): The soldiers had the idea that everyone on the other side of the Spey were outright rebels, so they quickly rounded up a bunch of sheep and other livestock as soon as they crossed. However, the reality was quite different; the residents of that parish had been hoping for the Army to come as their saviors. After the minister explained this situation and what had happened to His Royal Highness, he immediately ordered all the livestock that could be recovered unharmed to be returned and gave the minister £50 Sterling to distribute among the locals for their losses. He also instructed him to request whatever else was needed, and it would be arranged. His Royal Highness took up residence in the minister's home, where the Duke of Perth and others had only been a few hours earlier.

Aberdeen Militia

Aberdeen Military Unit

Immediately after the Duke’s leaving Aberdeen the two towns raised several companies of Militia to prevent their meeting with disturbance from any flying parties. His Royal Highness named their Officers and gave them authority to act. He also named twelve Governors to have the direction of the N. Town, till they should be allowed to choose regular Magistrates. There was also a proposal for raising a County Militia, but the Duke’s victory at Culloden made it to be dropped as useless.

Immediately after the Duke left Aberdeen, the two towns formed several companies of Militia to avoid any disruptions from roaming groups. His Royal Highness appointed their Officers and gave them the power to act. He also designated twelve Governors to oversee the N. Town until they were permitted to elect regular Magistrates. There was also a suggestion to raise a County Militia, but the Duke’s victory at Culloden led to it being abandoned as unnecessary.

[Pg 161]

[Pg 161]

Ancrum, Commander in Chief

Ancrum, Chief Commander

The Earl of Ancrum came to Aberdeen soon after the defeat of the Rebels as Commander in chief between Tey and Spey. Mark Kerr’s Dragoons were along the coast, Fleeming’s Regiment at Aberdeen, and garrisons detached from it to several places on Deeside, and Loudon’s under Major McKenzie at Strathboggy, with garrisons at Glenbucket, etc.

The Earl of Ancrum arrived in Aberdeen shortly after the Rebels were defeated as the Commander in Chief between Tey and Spey. Mark Kerr’s Dragoons were stationed along the coast, Fleeming’s Regiment was in Aberdeen, and garrisons were sent out to various locations on Deeside, with Loudon’s forces under Major McKenzie at Strathboggy, plus garrisons in Glenbucket, among other places.

Houses burnt and plundered

Houses burned and looted

Parties were immediately sent out through the country in search of Rebels, with orders also to plunder and burn their houses.[385] This severe order was not at all agreeable to Friends of the Government, who could in no shape relish Military execution, especially after the enemy was so effectually subdued. But it was not universally executed; most of the Rebel Gentlemen’s houses on Deeside were plundered, and some burnt, but these last were houses of little value and really no considerable loss to the proprietors. There was very little plundered in Buchan, some things only picked up by the soldiers in their searches unknown to the Officers. No Gentlemen’s houses were burnt, and only one or two farmers’ by a worthless fellow not concerned with the army, who by mighty pretences of zeal, had been employed by Ancrum to go with five or six of Loudon’s Regiment, in quest of Rebels. There were no houses burnt or plundered in or about the towns of Aberdeen; but a Tenant’s house in the land of Stonnywood, who had been very insolent. Glenbucket’s house was burnt in Strathdawn, as were also a tenant’s house or two about Strathboggy.

Parties were quickly sent throughout the country to find Rebels, with orders to loot and burn their homes. This harsh directive was not at all welcome to supporters of the Government, who did not take kindly to military action, especially after the enemy had been effectively defeated. However, it wasn't carried out everywhere; most of the Rebel Gentlemen's houses on Deeside were looted, and some were burned, but these were mostly of little value and didn’t really represent a significant loss for the owners. There was very little looting in Buchan, with only a few items taken by soldiers during their searches without the Officers' knowledge. No Gentlemen's houses were burned, and only one or two farmers’ homes were set ablaze by a worthless individual who wasn't part of the army, pretending to be zealous and was employed by Ancrum to accompany five or six members of Loudon’s Regiment in the hunt for Rebels. There were no houses burned or looted in or around the towns of Aberdeen; however, a Tenant’s house in Stonnywood was targeted because the occupant had been very insolent. Glenbucket’s house was burned in Strathdawn, along with one or two tenant’s houses around Strathboggy.

Order for Arms

Order for Weapons

Lord Ancrum’s orders for bringing in of arms were very extraordinary, and indeed cannot be better exposed[Pg 162] than by giving them and Lord Loudon’s in the same place, vid. Scots Mag. for July, p. 339.[386]

Lord Ancrum's orders for collecting arms were quite unusual, and they can best be understood by presenting them alongside Lord Loudon's, as seen in the Scots Mag. for July, p. 339.[Pg 162]

Ill Conduct of the Soldiers

Poor Behavior of the Soldiers

Most of the Officers of Fleeming’s Regiment were but young men, and did not at all behave in an agreeable manner. They seemed too much to look on the Army as a community of separate interests from that of the Nation, and it was the common axiom of those even in highest command in Aberdeen, that no laws but the Military were to be regarded. They took it in their heads to despise all in civil capacity, and especially as much as possible to thwart the Governors of the town in every thing. They had no manner of confidence either in the gentlemen of town or country, not even in those who had merited so well for their zeal for the Establishment; such as Mr. Middleton of Seaton, Mr. Burnet of Kemnay, etc., nay, some of them were on many occasions ill used by them. The Clergy of the Church of Scotland, for as much as they courted and applauded them in time of danger, were now their common subject for ridicule; and a deal of spleen was shown against them, that it should be thought they had in the least merited well[Pg 163] of their country, and thus should have a title to some regard as well as the Military, and not the least pendicle of the Army, a Commissary of foraging Clerks, etc., but would have more regard paid to their representative than any Clergyman.

Most of the officers in Fleeming’s Regiment were pretty young, and they didn’t behave very nicely. They seemed to view the Army as a separate community from the Nation, and it was a common belief among even the highest-ranking officials in Aberdeen that only military laws mattered. They looked down on anyone in a civil role and did everything they could to undermine the Governors of the town. They had no trust in the gentlemen from the town or countryside, not even those who had earned respect for their dedication to the Establishment, like Mr. Middleton of Seaton and Mr. Burnet of Kemnay. In fact, some of them were mistreated by these military officers. The clergy of the Church of Scotland, who had courted and praised the officers during times of trouble, were now the subject of their ridicule, and there was a lot of bitterness shown towards the idea that these clergymen had earned any respect from their country, and thus deserved recognition just like the military. Not even the slightest bit of the Army, like a Commissary of foraging Clerks, would receive more respect than their representative.

People Disgusted

People Are Disgusted

Such was the injudicious conduct of the Lord Ancrum and most of the officers of this Corps, which soon raised great disgust and heartburning. The Officers only, associated with one another, were seldom troubled with any advice from anybody of consequence acquainted with the country; or if they were, were sure to slight it. This gave infinite satisfaction to the Jacobites who rejoiced in these dissensions. It was this mutual disgust which on the one hand provoked the soldiers in so riotous a manner to break almost the whole windows in the town for not being illuminated on the first of August,[387] when the towns people had no reason to think Illuminations would be expected of them; and on the other hand provoked the townsfolks to resent it so highly, for had there been a good understanding betwixt the Corps[Pg 164] and them, such an outrage would probably not have been committed, or if some illegal things had been done they’d as probably have been overlooked, or at least easily atoned for.

The foolish behavior of Lord Ancrum and most of the officers in this Corps soon created a lot of frustration and bitterness. The Officers, who only associated with each other, rarely listened to advice from anyone important who knew the area; and when they did, they usually ignored it. This made the Jacobites very happy as they enjoyed seeing the divisions. This mutual frustration led the soldiers to riotously break almost all the windows in town because they weren’t lit up on August 1st, when the townspeople had no reason to think they were expected to celebrate. On the other hand, this also made the townsfolk very angry; if there had been a good relationship between the Corps[Pg 164] and the townspeople, such an incident probably wouldn’t have happened, or if some illegal actions had been taken, they might have been overlooked or at least easily forgiven.

Immediately after this, Ancrum was removed and Lord Sempile[388] succeeded him.

Immediately after this, Ancrum was removed and Lord Sempile[388] succeeded him.

[Pg 165]

[Pg 165]


[Pg 166]

[Pg 166]

A TRUE ACCOUNT OF MR. JOHN DANIEL’S PROGRESS WITH PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD IN THE YEARS 1745 AND 1746 WRITTEN BY HIMSELF

The manuscript preserved at Drummond Castle from which this Narrative is printed bears the following docquet:

The manuscript kept at Drummond Castle that this Narrative is printed from has the following note:

This is to certify, that I believe the aforegoing Narrative to be a correct Copy of the Original, written by my late Friend, Captain John Daniel, which I have frequently seen and read, and conversed with him, on the subject of its contents: more particularly as to the facts of the Duke of Perth’s death, on his passage from Scotland to France, on board the ship in which the said Captain Daniel was also a passenger. To which conversations, I can conscientiously depose if required.

This is to certify that I believe the above Narrative to be an accurate copy of the original, written by my late friend, Captain John Daniel, which I have often seen and read, and discussed with him regarding its contents: especially concerning the facts surrounding the Duke of Perth’s death during his journey from Scotland to France, aboard the ship where Captain Daniel was also a passenger. I can testify about these discussions if needed.

Witness my hand at Exmouth Devon. This 25th day of September 1830.

Witness my hand at Exmouth, Devon. This 25th day of September 1830.

R. B. Gibson.

R. B. Gibson.

Signed in the presence of
Herbert Mends Gibson,
Atty. at Law.

Signed in person
Herbert Mends Gibson
Lawyer.


[Note.—The notes in this narrative which are indicated by asterisks are written on the Drummond Castle manuscript in a later hand.]

[Note.—The notes in this narrative marked by asterisks are written in a later handwriting on the Drummond Castle manuscript.]


[Pg 167]

[Pg 167]

A TRUE ACCOUNT OF MR. JOHN DANIEL’S PROGRESS WITH PRINCE CHARLES

As Fortune, or rather Providence, has screened, conducted and brought me safe out of so many miseries and dangers; gratitude obliges me to be ever-thankful to that Omniscient Power, by whose particular bounty and goodness I now live, and survive a Cause, which, though it be now a little sunk, will, I doubt not, one day or other, rise again, and shine forth in its true colours, make its Hero famous to after-ages, and the Actors esteemed and their memory venerable. But since it is not permitted to pry into futurity, we may at least take a retrospective view of our own or others’ actions, and draw from them what may amuse, instruct or benefit human Society, and by that means fulfill in some measure the end for which we were sent into this world. Conceiving it therefore to be the best method of shewing my gratitude to Divine Providence, I shall give a short but true account of what happened to me during the time I had the honour of being a soldier under the banner of a most beloved Prince; hoping that the indulgent reader, whom curiosity may induce to peruse the following pages, will pardon the simplicity and ruggedness of my style, which, I am afraid, will be the more strikingly conspicuous, as, in order to preserve the thread of my History unbroken, I have occasionally been obliged to interweave with my narrative some extracts from the Memoirs of another, whose excellence totally eclipses my humble attempt.

As Fate, or rather Providence, has guided and helped me safely through so many hardships and dangers, I feel compelled to always express my gratitude to that All-Knowing Power, by whose particular kindness and generosity I now live. Although my cause may be temporarily overshadowed, I have no doubt that it will one day rise again, stand out in its true light, make its Hero renowned for future generations, and ensure the people involved are respected and remembered. However, since we can't look into the future, we can at least reflect on our own actions or those of others and learn from them in ways that entertain, educate, or benefit society as a whole, thus fulfilling, to some extent, the purpose for which we were brought into this world. Therefore, I believe the best way to show my gratitude to Divine Providence is to provide a brief but accurate account of my experiences while I had the honor of serving under the banner of a beloved Prince. I hope that any reader intrigued enough to dive into these pages will forgive the simplicity and roughness of my writing style, which I fear will stand out even more, as I have had to occasionally weave in some excerpts from the Memoirs of another, whose brilliance completely overshadows my modest attempt.

The lessons of loyalty, which had been instilled into me from my infant years, had made a deep and indelible impression upon my mind; and as I advanced towards maturity, and my reasoning faculties were developed, I[Pg 168] became so firmly convinced of the solidity of the principles which I had been taught, that, when arrived at the age of Twenty-two, I resolved never to deviate from them, but to act to the best of my power the part of a good and faithful subject, notwithstanding the customs of an unhappy kingdom to the contrary. Nor was it long before an opportunity presented itself of proving my fidelity to my lawful Sovereign; viz., when the Prince entered triumphantly into Lancashire on the 24th of November 1745,[389] attended by about four thousand armed men. The first time I saw this loyal army was betwixt Lancaster and Garstang; the brave Prince marching on foot at their head like a Cyrus or a Trojan Hero, drawing admiration and love from all those who beheld him, raising their long-dejected hearts, and solacing their minds with the happy prospect of another Golden Age. Struck with this charming sight and seeming invitation ‘Leave your nets and follow me,’ I felt a paternal ardor pervade my veins, and having before my eyes the admonition ‘Serve God and then your King,’ I immediately became one of his followers. How, and in what manner, I am now going to relate.

The lessons of loyalty that had been taught to me since I was a child left a lasting impression on my mind. As I grew into adulthood and my reasoning skills developed, I became firmly convinced of the strength of the principles I had learned. By the time I turned twenty-two, I decided that I would never stray from them, but instead, I would do my best to be a good and faithful subject, despite the customs of an unhappy kingdom that suggested otherwise. It wasn't long before I had a chance to prove my loyalty to my rightful Sovereign. This opportunity arose when the Prince triumphantly entered Lancashire on November 24, 1745, accompanied by about four thousand armed men. The first time I saw this loyal army was between Lancaster and Garstang, with the brave Prince marching at their head like a Cyrus or a Trojan Hero, earning admiration and love from everyone who saw him, lifting their long-depressed spirits, and giving them hope for another Golden Age. Captivated by this inspiring sight, as if answering a call to “Leave your nets and follow me,” I felt a strong surge of passion, and keeping in mind the reminder to “Serve God and then your King,” I immediately joined his ranks. How I did this and the details of my actions will follow.

The brave and illustrious Duke of Perth (whose merits it would require the pen of an angel properly to celebrate, being a true epitomé of all that is good) halting to refresh himself at a Public-House upon the road, where with some friends of mine I then happened to be; His Grace, being truly zealous in the cause, asked of them the disposition of the place and people. They replied, that they believed it to be much in the Prince’s favour. After some conversation on one thing and another, the Duke did me the honour to invite me to join; which request being nowise contrary to my inclination, I immediately answered His Grace, that I was exceeding willing to do anything that lay in my power for promoting the Prince’s interests, in any situation he might judge most proper. Upon this, the Duke honoured me with a most sincere[Pg 169] promise of his particular patronage; and not a little proud I was of acquiring such a friend on my first joining the Prince’s army, in which I had not before a single acquaintance. After some questions, the Duke desired me to get in readiness and to meet him on horse-back at Garstang; which in about two or three hours I accordingly did. The army being then in full march for Preston, the Duke desired me to go with forty men round that part of the country which I best knew; which forty men being accordingly put under my command, I went to Eccleston and Singleton in the Fyld Country, where I delivered some commissions, and caused the King to be proclaimed, the bailiffs, constables and burgesses of the place attending at the ceremony. I dispersed several of the Prince’s Manifestoes; and Exhortations were made, in order to shew the people the misery and oppressions of tyranny and usurpation, which like oxen yoked down to the plough, they seem to labour under; and calling upon them to rise up and, like lions to shake off the infamous yoke which too long had galled the necks of free-born Englishmen;—to assert their liberties honourably both before God and Man, and to prove to the world, that they remained true English hearts, equal to their fore-fathers’, who once had given laws to foreign States;—to exert their liberties under a Prince, who was come for their sakes, and for their sakes only, and with their concurrence would make them most happy. But alas! notwithstanding all our proposals and exhortations, few of them consented to join the Prince’s army. Therefore, having assembled those who did come in, orders were given for them to give up all their arms; which being reluctantly complied with, search was made in several houses, where we found a few; and amongst the rest we entered the house of an honest Quaker, whom I had seen about ten days before at a Public-house, where he accidentally came in whilst I was there, bringing with him a gun and a pair of pistols, which he had bought. Calling for his pot of ale, he began to harangue the host and the others present, telling what an honest man the[Pg 170] Justice of the Parish said he was, and that he could keep all the Papists quiet. And with these, said he (meaning the pistols) I can bid defiance to half a hundred of Rebels. I then heard him with great pleasure, thinking I should have the satisfaction of trying the honest Quaker’s courage; which accordingly happened. For, meeting with him at his own house, I demanded of him, if he had any arms. Not knowing me directly, he said he had none, and that he was not a man of blood. Vexed at this evasive answer, I replied: ‘Hark thee, my honest friend, since nothing but an action with thy own weapons will get thy arms from thee, rememberest thou in such a place to have boasted much of thy courage, with a gun and a pair of pistols?’ At which being much struck and hanging down his head he seemed greatly terrified. ‘How now,’ said I, ‘honest Friend, thou that wast so lately so pot-valiant, where now is thy boasted courage?’ ‘Pardon me,’ he then said, ‘I humbly beg, and I shall most willingly deliver up the arms; for I have done much amiss.’ I accordingly took the arms from him, and went off, much pleased with the adventure.

The brave and renowned Duke of Perth (whose achievements could only be rightly celebrated by an angel, as he truly embodies all that is good) stopped to refresh himself at a tavern on the way, where I happened to be with some friends. His Grace, being genuinely passionate about the cause, asked them about the attitude of the people and the place. They responded that they believed it was largely in favor of the Prince. After discussing various topics, the Duke graciously invited me to join him; this request was completely in line with my wishes, so I immediately told His Grace that I was very willing to do whatever I could to support the Prince's interests in any way he deemed appropriate. In response, the Duke promised me his personal support, and I felt quite proud to gain such a friend right as I joined the Prince’s army, in which I had previously had no connections. After a few questions, the Duke asked me to get ready and meet him on horseback at Garstang, which I did within about two to three hours. The army was then fully advancing toward Preston, and the Duke asked me to take forty men through the area I knew best; those forty men were placed under my command, and I headed to Eccleston and Singleton in the Fyld Country, where I delivered some orders and organized the proclamation of the King, with the local bailiffs, constables, and burgesses present for the event. I spread several of the Prince’s manifestos, and we urged the people to recognize the suffering and oppression caused by tyranny and usurpation, which had them laboring like oxen under a yoke; we called on them to rise up like lions and shake off the infamous burden that had long oppressed free-born Englishmen, to honorably assert their liberties before both God and Man, and to prove to the world that they were true Englishmen, equal to their ancestors who once governed foreign nations; to claim their freedoms under a Prince who had come for their sake and would, with their support, make them truly happy. Unfortunately, despite all our plans and appeals, few chose to join the Prince’s army. Therefore, after gathering those who did come forward, orders were given for them to surrender all their weapons; this was complied with hesitantly, and we searched several houses, where we found a few arms. Among them was an honest Quaker’s house; I had seen him about ten days earlier at a tavern, where he had come in unexpectedly while I was there, carrying a gun and a pair of pistols that he had purchased. When he called for a drink, he began to boast to the host and the others present, claiming how honest he was according to the Justice of the Parish and that he could keep all the Papists in line. And with these (meaning the pistols), he declared he could defy a dozen Rebels. I listened with great pleasure, thinking I would get the chance to test the honest Quaker’s bravery; and that opportunity came when I met him at his house and asked if he had any weapons. Not recognizing me right away, he claimed he had none and said he was not a violent man. Frustrated by his evasive response, I replied, “Listen, my honest friend, since nothing but a confrontation with your own weapons will get your arms from you, don’t you remember boasting about your courage with a gun and a pair of pistols here?” This seemed to strike him, and with his head down, he appeared quite scared. “What's this,” I said, “honest Friend, you who were so brave just recently, where is that courage now?” “Please forgive me,” he then said, “I humbly ask, and I will gladly hand over the weapons; for I have done wrong.” I took the weapons from him and departed, quite pleased with the encounter.

All these things being now effected, on the days after I had first seen His Grace the Duke of Perth, we began our march for Preston; and on the road, passing by a house of a person, who had in the year 1715 been the chief cause of my Father’s misfortune, I turned my horse in order to have hanged the man and certainly would have done it, had not maturer thoughts intervened, and stopt my revengeful rage. Continuing our journey, we arrived at Preston about 2 o’clock in the afternoon, having with us 39 English Recruits, whom I presented to His Grace the Duke of Perth, giving him an account of what had passed. At first he seemed to be somewhat concerned; but, recollecting himself, he afterwards welcomed me back, and said, he doubted not soon to see a great joining, and desired me to come to him the next day—for the Army halted two days at Preston. So, taking leave, I went to see some of my friends in the Town; and, amongst the rest, to acquaint my Father with what I had done.[Pg 171] He approved much of it, and gave me very salutary advice, telling me always to have the love and fear of God before me, and never to deviate from my duty, but to act to the best in my power the part of a brave soldier, and never to deject but comfort all those I found in misery. He then said to me, that as the infirmities of old age no longer permitted him to espouse so good a cause, in which he had once been actively engaged, he would continually invoke the Almighty for our success and preservation. So kissing me, he gave me his kind benediction: and with the viaticum in my pocket I took leave of the tenderest of Fathers and best of Parents.

After everything had been settled, in the days following my first meeting with His Grace the Duke of Perth, we started our march to Preston. On the way, we passed a house belonging to a man who had been the main cause of my father's troubles back in 1715. I turned my horse around with the intention of hanging him and definitely would have gone through with it, if not for more thoughtful considerations that held back my vengeful anger. Continuing our journey, we reached Preston around 2 o’clock in the afternoon, bringing with us 39 English recruits, whom I introduced to His Grace the Duke of Perth, recounting what had happened. At first, he seemed a bit worried, but then he collected himself, welcomed me back, and expressed his confidence that we would soon see many join us. He asked me to visit him the next day since the Army was staying in Preston for two days. After saying goodbye, I went to catch up with some friends in the town, including letting my father know what I had accomplished. He was very supportive and offered me wise advice, reminding me to always keep love and fear of God in my heart, never stray from my duty, and to act in the best way I could as a brave soldier, always uplifting those I found in distress. He then told me that, since the limitations of old age no longer allowed him to support such a good cause, in which he had once been actively involved, he would continuously pray for our success and safety. After giving me a kiss and his heartfelt blessing, with the viaticum in my pocket, I said goodbye to the most loving father and the best of parents.[Pg 171]

It being now the day on which the army marched from Preston, I waited, according to appointment, on the Duke of Perth, who told me, if I pleased, he would give me a Captain’s Commission in his Regiment; or, as one Mr. Gorogan[390] was to have a Colonel’s Commission over the English, that I should have a Company under him, and command the men I brought with me to Preston. The latter offer I accepted; and on being recommended to the Colonel by the Duke, I was made Captain; and Captain Larrey,[391] now living at St. Omers, was the other Captain, with 3 or 4 more. So we with the army began our march for Wiggan, where we were joined by a few more Loyalists. Having lain all night at Wiggan, we marched the next day for Manchester. The ringing of the Bells, and the great rejoicings and salutations with which we were welcomed, gave us mighty expectations. But too true is the saying: Parturiunt Montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

It was the day the army marched from Preston, and I waited, as planned, to meet the Duke of Perth. He offered me a Captain’s Commission in his Regiment, or, since a certain Mr. Gorogan was set to receive a Colonel’s Commission over the English, I could have a Company under him and command the men I brought with me to Preston. I accepted the latter offer, and after the Duke recommended me to the Colonel, I became Captain. Captain Larrey, who now lives in St. Omers, was the other Captain, along with three or four more. So we set off with the army toward Wiggan, where we were joined by a few more Loyalists. After spending the night in Wiggan, we marched the next day to Manchester. The sound of the bells ringing and the huge celebrations and greetings we received filled us with great hopes. But the saying is unfortunately true: Parturiunt Montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Word was immediately brought to the Prince, that a number of men were at his service; and to please and content the Town, it was thought necessary, that what men were raised at Manchester—vizt., the English Regiment—should be called the Manchester Regiment, and[Pg 172] all inferior Officers displaced as not being sufficiently Manchesterfied. However, regarding how matters went, I observed a little Man, by name Morgan,[392] deputed by the Prince with orders to inspect and commission new[Pg 173] Candidates, come into the room appointed for that purpose, and after salutations made, take his place at the head of the Table, with the Blackguard Dog[393] at his elbow, whether coming there by orders or impudence, I know not. Mr. Morgan began to tell the reason of his being sent, saying, that His Royal Highness was highly charmed at the report he had heard of the great number of Manchester men who were to join his standard; and assured them all of his particular protection, and of his willingness to grant them every favour in his power. This Declaration gave great joy to all present.

Word quickly reached the Prince that several men were at his disposal; to satisfy and please the Town, it was deemed necessary for the men raised in Manchester—namely, the English Regiment—to be referred to as the Manchester Regiment, and[Pg 172] all lower-ranking officers were dismissed for not being sufficiently from Manchester. However, as events unfolded, I noticed a short man named Morgan,[392] appointed by the Prince with orders to assess and commission new[Pg 173] candidates, enter the designated room. After exchanging greetings, he took his place at the head of the table, accompanied by the Blackguard Dog[393], whether he was there by command or sheer audacity, I couldn’t say. Mr. Morgan began to explain the purpose of his visit, stating that His Royal Highness was very pleased with the report of the significant number of Manchester men ready to rally to his banner; he assured everyone of his special protection and his willingness to grant them every favor he could. This announcement filled all present with joy.

A dispute then arose concerning the making of a new Colonel:[394] but taking a dislike at some of their proceedings, I gave up all pretentions to anything amongst them, and joined Lord Elcho’s Guards;[395] so the place was vacant.[Pg 174] The rest however were called upon to be Regimental Captains, and so on, according as the aforesaid pursuivant of Mr. Morgan notified: for, on demand who was to be the first Captain, all, conscious of each other’s merit, were silent; till he, with a face of assurance, named such a man, for he had great interest; after him, another, for he could raise a great number of men; and after him another, for he had great merit and power; till all the Captain’s Commissions were disposed of according to his direction; and then, looking about him, he said of the rest, it was hang choice which was pitched upon first.

A disagreement came up about appointing a new Colonel:[394] but after I got unhappy with some of their actions, I dropped any ambitions of being part of it and joined Lord Elcho’s Guards;[395] so the position was left open.[Pg 174] The others were then asked to become Regimental Captains and so on, based on what Mr. Morgan's messenger said: when asked who should be the first Captain, everyone, aware of each other's abilities, remained quiet; until he confidently pointed out a man, as he had strong connections; then named another, as he could gather a large group of men; and another after that, because he had significant skills and influence; until all the Captain’s positions were filled according to his choices; and then, looking around, he remarked that it was whoever was picked first that was fortunate.

The Manchester Officers, being now formed, agreed to petition the Prince to stay another day there; which he agreed to in the expectation of raising a great number of men. I was as credulous as they: but was much surprised to see the next day those men whom I had brought from behind Preston, and on the road thence to that place, enrolled for the most part in the Manchester Regiment, and thus Manchesterised, if it may be said so: and much troubled I was to see many of those men who had followed me, had been paid out of my own pocket and been under my care till our arrival in Manchester, disposed of, nay taken away from me in that manner.

The Manchester Officers, now formed, decided to ask the Prince to stay another day there, which he agreed to, hoping to gather a large number of men. I was just as gullible as they were, but I was really surprised the next day to see most of the men I had brought from behind Preston, and along the way to that place, enrolled in the Manchester Regiment, and thus Manchesterised, if that’s the right word. It troubled me to see many of those men who had followed me, whom I had paid for myself and taken care of until we reached Manchester, being taken from me in that way.

Quos Ego—sed motos praestat componere fluctus.

Whom I control—but it's better to calm the waves that are stirred up.

However, being willing to be as useful as possible to the cause, I acquiesced in whatever they thought proper. The Prince, tho’ again requested to stay, being weary of delay to no purpose, ordered the following day the army to make a short march, and gave leave to the Manchester Regiment to stay a day longer to get more recruits, on promise to march up to the army the day after: which we did; but our stay was not productive of much benefit.

However, wanting to be as helpful as I could to the cause, I agreed to whatever they thought was best. The Prince, although asked again to stay, tired of the pointless delay, ordered the army to make a short march the following day. He allowed the Manchester Regiment to stay another day to gather more recruits, with the promise of joining the army the day after, which we did. But our extra time didn't result in much benefit.

The Comand of the Army, which till then had been the Duke of Perth’s, was at this time given to Lord George Murray.[396] The real cause of this change I cannot pretend[Pg 175] to divine: all I can say, is that the received opinion amongst us was that Lord George being looked upon as a man, whose name would bear a greater sway in England, especially amongst loyal Protestants, and help to efface the prejudice and notion of Popery and arbitrary Power, which some, though vainly imagined were rushing in like a torrent upon them; it was just proper to place the chief command in him: and the Duke of Perth, for the good of his King and Country, most readily resigned, shewing himself willing to promote the cause in any station, and giving a notable example of a brave warrior, willing to command and willing to obey. Whether there was any other secret reason, I must leave it for time to unfold.

The command of the Army, which had previously been held by the Duke of Perth, was given to Lord George Murray at this time. The real reason for this change is something I can't figure out; all I can say is that the general belief among us was that Lord George was seen as someone whose name would carry more weight in England, especially among loyal Protestants, and help to dispel the prejudice and fears of Popery and arbitrary power, which some imagined were sweeping towards them. It seemed appropriate to place the top command in his hands. The Duke of Perth, for the sake of his King and Country, willingly stepped down, showing that he was ready to support the cause in any role, setting a great example of a brave warrior who was both willing to lead and to follow. Whether there was any other hidden reason, I'll leave it for time to reveal.

The Army being now arrived at Congleton in Cheshire, nothing particular happened there, except that a patrol took one Captain Wier, a famous spy,[397] with seven dragoons, who were feasting at a house some distance off. This Wier was by birth a Scotchman, and had been employed in many villanies, and having served the Court not only as a spy upon us, but amongst other foreign Powers, had been promoted for his diligence in this business. He was conducted back with us to Carlisle—how unfortunate for us, that he was not put to death, considering what he has since done!—but his life was saved through the innate clemency of the Prince, though he merited the worst of punishments.

The Army had now arrived at Congleton in Cheshire, and nothing notable happened there, except that a patrol captured Captain Wier, a well-known spy, along with seven dragoons who were enjoying a meal at a nearby house. Wier was originally from Scotland and had been involved in many shady activities. He had served the Court not just as a spy against us, but also with other foreign powers, and had been promoted for his efforts in this role. He was brought back with us to Carlisle—how unfortunate for us that he wasn't executed, given what he's done since then!—but his life was spared due to the inherent kindness of the Prince, even though he deserved the harshest punishment.

On the first of December we departed from Macclesfield, in order to march to Leek; where we staid all night, and marched the next day for Derby. All that morning it was rumored amongst us, that we should have an engagement as the enemy’s army was said to be lying about five or six miles from us at Newcastle and Stone in Staffordshire. So we marched in the best order we could to receive them: and about eleven o’Clock, having espied a party at[Pg 176] some distance on the mountains, we drew up in order of battle, and stood so for some time, and would have fought them: but perceiving it was a false alarm, we continued on our route to Derby, where we arrived somewhat late and fatigued. But two days’ repose sufficiently refreshed us.

On December 1st, we left Macclesfield to march to Leek, where we stayed the night before continuing on to Derby the next day. That morning, there were rumors among us that we might have a fight since the enemy’s army was reportedly about five or six miles away at Newcastle and Stone in Staffordshire. So, we marched in the best formation we could to prepare for them. Around eleven o'clock, after spotting a group in the distance on the hills, we formed up for battle and waited for a while, ready to fight. But realizing it was a false alarm, we resumed our journey to Derby, arriving a bit late and tired. However, two days of rest were enough to refresh us.

Derby is a large and handsome town. The heads of it were much terrified at our entrance, many of them having made large subscriptions to Government; and therefore had quitted their houses with the utmost precipitation. It fell to my lot to be quartered in one of them, vizt., one Mr. Chambers. Coming in with my billet, I asked if I could lodge there. The Steward immediately replied that I could—adding ‘And any thing we can do for you, shall be done: only pity us in our situation, which is most deplorable.’ At this wondering much what he meant, I told him to be of good courage—that neither I nor any of us were come to hurt him or any one. Having thus abated the horrid notion they had of us, which was only capable of being conceived too hard for expression, being so very strange; he conducted me to the Housekeeper, who was also in tears. She was somewhat seized with horror at the sight, though my countenance was none of the roughest: but soon collected herself and made the same answer with the utmost feminine tenderness, putting themselves and the whole house under my mercy. I truly was much surprised, for anything of this kind was quite new to me: however, after pulling off my riding-coat and boots she conducted me into a fine room; where, at entering, I perceived a number of jewels and watches lying confusedly up and down, and many things else in the utmost confusion. I demanded, to whom they belonged, and what was the reason of their being so carelessly laid up. The housekeeper then began to tell me the whole affair—‘Sir,’ said she, ‘Mr. Chambers, the master of this house, no enemy to you, has retired with his lady and family into the country,’ ‘Why so?’ said I. ‘Not conscious,’ replied she, ‘of any thing particular against you, but out of fear of what the Highlanders might do against him.’[Pg 177] She then begged, that I would have compassion on them, and be their protector; which, after some short discourse, I promised, telling them, that what was consistent with reason, and a countryman, they should always find in me. I then ordered all the things that lay so confusedly thrown about, to be locked up, assuring them, that nothing should be touched or broke open, unless with authority. So for two days I ruled master there, and, I hope they will generously acknowledge, much to their content and satisfaction in that situation of affairs—having preserved the Young Lady’s jewels from the hand of rapine, and hindered the house from being damaged.

Derby is a large and attractive town. The leaders were quite scared when we arrived, as many of them had made significant contributions to the Government, which caused them to leave their homes in a hurry. I ended up being housed in the home of a Mr. Chambers. When I arrived with my assignment, I asked if I could stay there. The Steward immediately said I could, adding, “And anything we can do for you will be done; just have pity on us in our situation, which is terrible.” Curious about what he meant, I reassured him that neither I nor anyone else was here to harm him or anyone. Having eased their terrifying view of us, which was hard to describe as it was so bizarre, he took me to the Housekeeper, who was also in tears. She seemed horrified at my presence, even though I wasn't intimidating, but soon gathered herself and responded with the utmost kindness, entrusting herself and the entire household to my mercy. I was genuinely surprised, as this was completely new to me; however, after taking off my riding coat and boots, she led me to a nice room. Upon entering, I noticed several jewels and watches scattered about, along with many other items in complete disarray. I asked who they belonged to and why they were so carelessly stored. The housekeeper explained, “Sir, Mr. Chambers, the master of this house, who holds no ill-will towards you, has fled with his wife and family to the countryside.” “Why?” I asked. “They are not aware of anything specific against you, but are afraid of what the Highlanders might do to them,” she replied. She then begged me to have compassion for them and be their protector, which, after a brief conversation, I agreed to, telling them they could always count on me for reasonable support as a countryman. I then instructed that all the items lying around be locked up, assuring them that nothing would be touched or broken into without proper authorization. For two days, I was in charge there, and I hope they will honestly recognize that I helped them significantly in that situation—protecting the young lady's jewels from theft and preventing damage to the house.

A rumor was here spread amongst us, that Cumberland Will and Ligonier[398] intended to give us battle; which I believe would have happened, if we had marched a day or two more towards London. Every one prepared himself to act in the best manner the valiant Soldier. But the Prince’s Council judged it more proper to retire back into Scotland without risking a battle, and there to await the arrival of foreign Succors. How far they acted amiss or well in this, I know not: but a great alteration was afterwards seen amongst us. The brave Prince at that out of a generous ardour and Love to his country, wished he had been twenty feet under ground! but, notwithstanding all this, a march back was agreed upon, after we had halted two days at Derby. Here I cannot pass by an accident that happened somewhat ominous—though I am none of the most credulous—but thence we may date our first misfortune. Great numbers of People and Ladies (who had come from afar to see the Prince),[Pg 178] crowding into his room, overturned a table, which in falling overturned and broke the Royal Standard—soon after our return was agreed upon—so I leave the reader to judge and make his reflexions on this. It would seem certain at least that Providence miraculously concurs, while such and such things are carried on. Thus, when Moses held up his hands, Joshua prevailed; but when through weariness he in the least relaxed the Israelites had the worst of it. So perhaps it was, that our enterprise was not vigorously enough pursued: and remarkable it certainly was, that the Royal Standard should be broken immediately after our return was resolved upon.

A rumor spread among us that Cumberland Will and Ligonier[398] planned to engage us in battle, which I believe would have happened if we had marched for a day or two more toward London. Everyone prepared himself to act like a brave soldier. But the Prince’s Council decided it was better to retreat back into Scotland without risking a battle and to wait for the arrival of foreign support. I can't say whether they made the right choice or not, but we soon saw a significant change among us. The brave Prince, fueled by his love for his country, wished he could be twenty feet underground! Despite all this, a retreat was agreed upon after we had stayed two days in Derby. Here, I can't ignore a somewhat ominous incident—though I'm not the most superstitious person—this is where we might trace our first misfortune. A large crowd of people and ladies (who had come from far away to see the Prince), crowded into his room, knocking over a table that fell and broke the Royal Standard—just as our decision to retreat was made. So, I leave it to the reader to judge and reflect on this. It certainly seems like Providence was at work during these moments. Just like when Moses held up his hands, Joshua succeeded; but when he relaxed even a little from exhaustion, the Israelites did poorly. Perhaps it was the same for us: our campaign wasn't pursued with enough vigor. It was certainly striking that the Royal Standard broke just after our decision to retreat.

The third day being come, our march was proclaimed; and we began our return,[399] wondering what it could forebode. About this time we heard of Lord John Drummond’s Regiment having landed in Scotland, and that more troops were daily expected from France. Some few afterwards came, but the whole, including the said Regiment, did not exceed Five Hundred effective men—too small an assistance in the then state of our affairs![400] Soon after their arrival, Lord Lewis Gordon, being joined by the foresaid regiment, defeated Lord Loudon at Inverury, so completely dispersing his army, that it was rendered ineffective during the remainder of the campaign.[401] This happened very luckily for us; for if Lord Loudon had not met with a check, he would probably have been able to collect a strong army to cut off our retreat, or at least give us a very warm reception on our return to Scotland. This news therefore gave us[Pg 179] great comfort; and we courageously continued our march to join the above mentioned troops (in number one thousand men) by the same road we travelled before. The English Army, being informed of our retreat, immediately pursued us; but we found the saying to be very true ‘A good pair of heels is worth two pair of hands.’ Diverting it was, to hear those bells, which before had rung for us, turn to ring for them; we sometimes going out at one end of a town, whilst they were coming in at the other: and no less odd it was, to see the Magistrates who had canted when the Prince was amongst them, immediately after taking an opposite side, and cursing and detesting those whom they had just before saluted with a Judas-kiss.

The third day came, and our march was announced; we began our return, wondering what it might mean. Around this time, we heard that Lord John Drummond’s Regiment had landed in Scotland and that more troops were expected from France daily. A few did arrive later, but in total, including that Regiment, there were only about five hundred effective men—far too little help given the current situation! Soon after they arrived, Lord Lewis Gordon, joined by the aforementioned regiment, defeated Lord Loudon at Inverury, scattering his army so thoroughly that it couldn’t operate for the rest of the campaign. This turned out to be very fortunate for us; if Lord Loudon hadn’t faced a setback, he probably would have been able to gather a strong army to cut off our retreat or at least give us a rough welcome on our return to Scotland. So this news gave us great comfort; we boldly continued our march to join the aforementioned troops (numbering one thousand men) along the same route we’d taken before. The English Army, having learned of our retreat, immediately pursued us; but we found the saying to be true: “A good pair of heels is worth two pair of hands.” It was amusing to hear those bells, which had previously rung for us, now ringing for them; sometimes we would exit one end of a town just as they were entering at the other. It was also strange to see the Magistrates who had praised us when the Prince was there suddenly take a different side and start cursing those whom they had just previously welcomed with a Judas-kiss.

The Enemy, finding that they could not come up with us, resolved, though very ungenerously to their own party, to endeavour to raise the inhabitants of the towns through which we had to pass against us, by spreading false reports, that the Prince’s Army had been entirely defeated, and that nothing remained for them but to exert themselves like good subjects, and to suffer none of the fugitives to escape. This report was believed in many of the towns: great rejoicings were made, and every man thought himself capable of knocking out a Rebel’s brains with a club or a staff. Then you might see heroic valour displayed among cocks that never crowed but among hens upon their own dunghill. But the malicious expectations of our enemies were disappointed; and what they had contrived for our ruin redounded much to our profit. Notwithstanding the mildness of the Prince during the march of his army through England, and though he had suffered no one to be oppressed, we heard betwixt Derby and Manchester, that the latter town had made great rejoicing, and had raised some men to stop us: but we soon made these mighty heroes tremble, and the town pay for their rash determination for entering regularly and triumphantly, we shewed them we were not the people they took us for, and convinced them, that our situation was not so bad as had been falsely reported.

The enemy, realizing they couldn't catch up to us, decided, although it was quite unfair to their own side, to try to incite the locals in the towns we were passing through against us. They spread false rumors that the Prince's Army had been completely defeated, claiming that the locals had no choice but to act like loyal subjects and ensure none of the fleeing soldiers got away. Many towns believed these stories, resulting in celebrations, with everyone thinking they were tough enough to take down a rebel with a stick or a bat. You could see so-called bravery from people who usually only felt bold on their own turf. However, the malicious plans of our enemies backfired, and what they intended to be our downfall ended up benefiting us greatly. Despite the Prince’s kindness during our march through England, and the fact that he had allowed no oppression, we heard between Derby and Manchester that Manchester was celebrating and had gathered some men to stop us. But we quickly made those so-called heroes quiver and made the town pay for their foolish decision. Arriving in style, we showed them we weren’t the people they thought we were and proved that our situation was not as dire as they had falsely claimed.

[Pg 180]

[Pg 180]

Every one therefore, vexed to the very heart at being so deceived, began to lay upon the mob the fault of what had happened, and the Mob on the Heads of the Place, so that discord and confusion arose among them. The Piper, however was well paid for their dancing; for it cost them five thousand pounds Sterling—scarcely a sufficient atonement for their malice.[402] Here I cannot pass by mentioning a barbarous deed perpetrated before we came to Manchester which shewed the innate cruelty of our enemies on the one hand, and our clemency on the other. A young English lad, who had joined the Prince, being somewhat before the army, had through weariness laid himself down to rest under a hedge, and fallen fast asleep. He was soon perceived by a woman and her boy: and this cruel fiend immediately determined to murder him as he lay sleeping like a lamb, conscious of no harm; she accordingly with the assistance of her son cut the poor young man’s throat. The army coming up soon after, we espied the mangled body in that shocking condition; and on searching the next house adjacent, we found a young boy in bed much besmeared with blood, and trembling, who confessed the fact, and said that his mother was the chief author of it. They were both taken into custody, and a report of the whole made to the Prince: but he was against their being put to death, so that by a wonderful clemency they escaped the just reward of their crime.

Everyone was deeply upset about being so deceived and started blaming the mob for what had happened, and the mob turned on the leaders of the place, which led to discord and confusion among them. The Piper, however, was well compensated for their dancing; it cost them five thousand pounds sterling—hardly enough to make up for their malice. [402] Here I must mention a brutal act committed before we arrived in Manchester that showed both the innate cruelty of our enemies and our clemency. A young English lad, who had joined the Prince, had laid down to rest under a hedge due to exhaustion and fell fast asleep. He was soon noticed by a woman and her son, and this cruel woman decided to murder him while he was sleeping peacefully, unaware of any danger; she, along with her son, cut the poor young man's throat. When the army arrived shortly after, we saw the mangled body in that horrifying condition; upon searching the nearby house, we found a young boy in bed covered in blood and trembling, who admitted his mother was responsible. They were both taken into custody, and a report was made to the Prince; however, he opposed their execution, and by an astonishing act of clemency, they escaped the consequences of their crime.

We halted two days at Manchester, and on the third marched for Wiggan. When going out of the town, a gun was fired at the Prince by a villain, who, mistaking him, shot at a Mr. Sullivan, and luckily missed him. Search was made for him, but in vain—and no great matter for any thing he would have suffered from us; for many exercised their malice merely on account of the known goodness and clemency of the Prince, which however they would not have dared to do, if he had permitted[Pg 181] a little more severity in punishing them. The Army irritated by the frequent instances of the enemy’s malice began to behave with less forbearance. And now few there were, who would go on foot, if they could ride; and mighty taking, stealing, and pressing of horses there was amongst us, for none of us was ever sure of keeping his own. Diverting it was to see the Highlanders now mounted without either breeches, saddle, or anything else but the bare back of the horse to ride on; and for their bridle, only a straw rope. In this manner we marched out of England, many a good horse being brought in to give us a lift.

We stayed in Manchester for two days, and on the third day we set out for Wigan. As we were leaving the town, a gun went off at the Prince from a villain who, mistaking him, shot at Mr. Sullivan instead and, fortunately, missed. There was a search for the shooter, but it was unsuccessful—and it wouldn't have mattered much to us what he suffered, since many directed their anger at the Prince simply because of his well-known kindness and mercy. However, they wouldn't have dared to act this way if he had shown a bit more toughness in punishing them. The Army, frustrated by the enemy’s continuous spiteful actions, started to lose their patience. Now, very few would walk if they could ride; there was quite a bit of taking, stealing, and pressing of horses among us, as no one felt safe keeping their own. It was amusing to see the Highlanders riding without breeches, saddles, or anything else except the bare backs of the horses, using only a straw rope for a bridle. In this way, we marched out of England, with many good horses being brought in to help us along.

During our march to Wiggan, and thence to Preston, nothing particular happened; only the enemy continued to pursue us, yet we made no more haste on that account. I met upon the road my old patron the Duke of Perth; who asking me how I did, and how I liked the service. I told him ‘Very well!’ He then inquired ‘How I could bear the thought of going into Scotland’—and I immediately replied That I had ever been curious to see that kingdom, and was proud of benefiting the cause, or occasion that was offered. His Grace was pleased to promise, that he would recommend me to the Colonel, who, he doubted not, would be a father to me; as it accordingly fell out. Marching on to Preston, we halted there two days; and on the third in the morning, immediately after we had quitted the town, the enemy took possession of it. On our arrival at Lancaster in the evening, I was recommended to Colonel Elphinstone, afterwards Lord Balmerino,[403] who commanded the second troop of the Prince’s Life Guards. Having equipped myself[Pg 182] for that purpose when in Preston, I rode on somewhat before the Army, to be in readiness at Lancaster: but on the road, nine miles distant from that place, alighting from my horse to refresh myself at a Public house, and leaving my horse two or three minutes at the door; he was immediately taken away by some of the soldiers, and I entirely lost him. Vexed I was to be served so; and having nine miles to walk in my boots sorely harrassed me. However, fortifying myself with patience, and premeditating revenge, I at last, though somewhat late got up to Lancaster: and now being in great anxiety for a horse, being the next day to have the honour of riding in the Guards, I resolved to wait an hour or two till my servant Dick, a Yorkshire-Man, came up, and to make use of his horse, till such time as I could get another. But his arrival brought me little satisfaction; for, after he had refreshed himself, and I had told him the misfortune that had happened to me, he went out, and wrote me a few lines to the following purport:—

During our march to Wigan, and then to Preston, nothing unusual happened; the enemy kept pursuing us, but we didn’t hurry because of that. On the road, I ran into my old supporter, the Duke of Perth, who asked how I was doing and how I liked the service. I told him 'Very well!' He then asked how I felt about going into Scotland, and I immediately replied that I had always been curious to see that kingdom and was proud to contribute to the cause or opportunity that arose. His Grace kindly promised that he would recommend me to the Colonel, who, he believed, would look after me like a father; which turned out to be true. After marching on to Preston, we stopped there for two days; and on the third morning, just after we left the town, the enemy took control of it. Upon arriving in Lancaster that evening, I was introduced to Colonel Elphinstone, who later became Lord Balmerino, the commander of the second troop of the Prince’s Life Guards. Having prepared myself for this when in Preston, I rode ahead of the Army to be ready in Lancaster: but on the way, nine miles from there, I got off my horse to rest at a pub and left my horse at the door for only a couple of minutes; he was quickly taken by some soldiers, and I completely lost him. I was frustrated about that, and having to walk nine miles in my boots was tough on me. Nonetheless, I tried to stay patient and planned my revenge; I finally arrived, albeit a bit late, in Lancaster. Anxious for a horse since I was set to have the honor of riding with the Guards the next day, I decided to wait a couple of hours for my servant Dick, a Yorkshireman, to catch up, so I could use his horse until I found another. However, his arrival didn’t bring me much relief; after he rested and I explained my unfortunate situation, he went out and wrote me a brief note with the following content:—

Dear Master,—I am truly sorry for your misfortune but I do not much like the Army’s behaviour; neither can I think of going into Scotland, and you know a Yorkshire-man coming home without a horse is laughed at. Therefore not doubting but you can provide yourself better than with this, I beg leave to be your Humble Servant Dick, promising to rejoin you, when I see you in these parts again.’

Dear Sir,—I’m really sorry about your situation, but I don’t appreciate how the Army is acting; I also can’t see myself going to Scotland, and you know a Yorkshireman returning home without a horse is a joke. So, trusting that you can find something better than this, I kindly ask to be your Humble Servant Dick, and I promise to meet up with you again when I’m back in these parts.

He left these lines with the landlord of the house to give me; which he did about an hour after.

He gave these messages to the landlord of the house to pass on to me, which he did about an hour later.

So, being served a true Yorkshire trick, I lost both man and horse. I bethought myself of applying to one Mr. Grant,[404] Colonel of the Artillery, thinking there might be[Pg 183] a spare horse. When I had informed him of what had happened, he promised that he would endeavour to provide me with a horse the next morning, till he could buy or get another; which kindness of his was very seasonable. But going down the Castle-Hill, where the Artillery lay, I espied two Highlanders stealing a horse, and breaking down a pair of barn-doors. When they saw me advancing towards them, one of them went, and the other stood guard. Now I thought this a good opportunity to provide myself: So I went boldly in, and inquired whether Captain McDonald’s Horse were not there; the man answered he knew not; at which taking courage, and going up to the horse, I demanded whose that was. He made me the same answer. ‘Friend,’ said I, ‘if you do not, I do,’ and I immediately took the horse, well pleased, that I had got a Titt for Tatt (as the Lancashire saying is). So returning to my lodgings with my prize, I repaired to wait upon Colonel Elphinstone, who received me very graciously, having been spoken to before by the Duke of Perth. He welcomed me among them, assured me of all that was kind and civil in his power, and then invited me to sup with him. After thanking him, I accepted his kind invitation; and when I took my leave of him he renewed his promises of kindness, and desired me to be in readiness to mount next morning at his quarters.

So, after falling for a classic Yorkshire trick, I ended up losing both my horse and my companion. I thought about reaching out to Mr. Grant, the Colonel of the Artillery, hoping he might have a spare horse available. When I explained what had happened, he promised he would do his best to get me a horse by the next morning until he could buy or acquire another, which was really helpful. However, on my way down Castle-Hill where the Artillery was stationed, I spotted two Highlanders trying to steal a horse and breaking down some barn doors. When they noticed me approaching, one of them took off while the other stayed behind to keep watch. I figured this was a good chance to help myself, so I confidently walked over and asked if Captain McDonald's horse was there. The guy replied that he didn’t know, which gave me courage. As I approached the horse, I asked who it belonged to. He gave me the same response. “Look, if you don’t tell me, I will just take it,” I said, and I took the horse, feeling quite pleased that I had gotten a sort of payback. So, I headed back to my lodgings with my new acquisition and then visited Colonel Elphinstone, who greeted me warmly since the Duke of Perth had already mentioned me. He welcomed me into their ranks, assured me of all the kindness and respect he could offer, and then invited me to dinner with him. After thanking him, I accepted his kind invitation, and as I was leaving, he reiterated his offers of help and asked me to be ready to ride out from his quarters the next morning.

At this time the Yorkshire Hunters[405] endeavoured to shew themselves against us, but little to their honour. This was a regiment composed of the Yorkshire Gentlemen, many of whom mounted themselves and their servants on the best light horses they had, and gave themselves the fore-said name. As we were marching[Pg 184] into Lancaster, these Hunters attacked some of our Light Horse in the rear: but finding they had caught Tartars, they quickly retreated; and being pursued, some of them were taken prisoners—so that Yorkshire seemed to be put upon Yorkshire.

At this point, the Yorkshire Hunters[405] tried to make a show against us, but it didn’t go well for them. This was a group made up of Yorkshire Gentlemen, many of whom equipped themselves and their servants with the best light horses they could find and took on the name they chose. As we were marching[Pg 184] into Lancaster, these Hunters attacked some of our Light Horse from behind, but after realizing they were in over their heads, they quickly fell back. When we chased them, some were captured—so it felt like Yorkshire was fighting against Yorkshire.

About this time the Prince’s Council resolved to despatch some one with orders to Lord Lewis Gordon and Lord John Drummond, and the rest of the Prince’s adherents who were in arms, to meet us at Carlisle; and for this purpose the Duke of Perth set out attended by about One-hundred Light-Horse. When they arrived at Kendal, the inhabitants of that place, seeing them come in great haste, judged they were flying from the battle and endeavouring to make their escape, assembled in a tumultuous manner, and, after insulting them, at last fired upon them out of the windows—and at going out of the town, a ball was fired at the Duke of Perth in his Chaise, who, looking out courageously, noticed the place it came from. Though the ball happily missed the Duke it shot Captain Cameron’s horse. Being now out of the town, we resolved boldly to re-enter it, and quell that insulting mob. So, marching back, they took the man who fired the fore-said ball, and killed two or three: yet this villain escaped with only a few blows from the gentleman whose horse he had killed; though certainly he would have been put to death, had not the Duke interceded for him. The town of Kendal being thus appeased, we continued our route: but hearing that the Militia of Pe[n]r[i]th and other places, thinking our Army had been cut off, had risen, and were, in conjunction with the Hessians who had landed thereabouts,[406] intercepting the road they thought they were to pass; the Duke resolved to pass by another in order to miss them. But his guide, instead of shewing the right way, conducted them upon the enemy; so that ascending the summit of the hill, they perceived their danger, being within gun-shot of a great body of both horse and foot, which unexpected sight struck a great panic amongst the[Pg 185] Duke’s party. The Duke was for fighting his way through them: but Colonel Bagott,[407] Colonel of the Hussars, was of another opinion, and he being seconded by some others, a retreat was agreed upon. The enemy immediately dispatched some of their Light-horse in pursuit of them: but the Duke’s party retiring in good order, kept their pursuers, notwithstanding all their firing, at a good distance; and after being pursued five or six miles, returned upon them with such vigour, that they took three or four prisoners, rescued the Duke’s baggage, which had just before been seized, and made them retire faster than they had come. Finding it however in vain to pursue his enterprise, the Duke rejoined the Army.

Around this time, the Prince’s Council decided to send someone to Lord Lewis Gordon, Lord John Drummond, and the other supporters of the Prince who were armed, to meet us at Carlisle. To carry out this mission, the Duke of Perth set out with about one hundred Light-Horse. When they arrived in Kendal, the local people, seeing them come in a rush, thought they were fleeing from battle and trying to escape. They gathered in a chaotic way, insulted the soldiers, and eventually shot at them from the windows. As they were leaving the town, a bullet was fired at the Duke of Perth in his carriage. He bravely looked out and saw where it came from. Although the bullet fortunately missed the Duke, it hit Captain Cameron’s horse. Once outside of the town, we decided to boldly re-enter it and put an end to the insulting mob. Marching back, they captured the man who fired the shot and killed two or three others; however, this culprit escaped with just a few blows from the gentleman whose horse he had killed. He certainly would have been executed if the Duke hadn’t intervened on his behalf. With the town of Kendal calmed down, we continued on our route. But we heard that the Militia of Pe[n]r[i]th and other areas, believing our Army was defeated, had risen up and were working with the Hessians who had landed nearby, blocking the road they thought we would take. The Duke decided to take another route to avoid them. But his guide mistakenly led them right into the enemy's path. When they reached the top of the hill, they realized their danger, being within gunshot of a large group of both cavalry and infantry, which caused a great panic among the Duke's party. The Duke wanted to fight his way through, but Colonel Bagott, the Colonel of the Hussars, disagreed. With support from others, they agreed to retreat. The enemy immediately sent some Light-Horse after them, but the Duke’s group fell back in good order, keeping their pursuers at a safe distance despite being fired upon. After five or six miles of pursuit, they turned on their attackers with such strength that they captured three or four prisoners, recovered the Duke’s baggage that had just been taken, and forced the enemy to retreat faster than they had come. Realizing it was useless to continue his mission, the Duke rejoined the Army.

We having staid all night at Lancaster, I went, according to appointment, to wait upon my Colonel, who, being mounted at the head of his troops, placed me in his corps. We were ordered that day to march in the rear of the army; and, as we left the town, the enemy immediately took possession of it, and followed us some little way out, so that we did not directly know their intention. But, finding they soon returned, we marched on (nothing particular happening) to Kendal where we halted all night and made the town pay for its past behaviour. We then continued our retreat in exceeding bad weather and roads to Carlisle: but by the severity of the season we were obliged to make a shorter march than we intended, and halt all night at a village called Shap, where we suffered very much on account of the bad accommodation it afforded. However staying there all night we assembled together early next morning. Some few of us got that night to Carlisle. But I cannot pass by an affair that happened at Clifton which was as follows:—The enemy’s advanced Guard, commanded by General Honeywood, having got somewhat before us, planted himself in ambush near the road we were to march, and from behind the hedges expected, as the army approached to cut them off; but there the biter was bit: for though we came[Pg 186] unknowingly upon them, we had the good fortune to receive their attack in good order, killed and drowned many of them, and put the rest to flight: General Honeywood himself narrowly escaped, having lost his arm, and severely wounded. This brave action was chiefly owing to the courage of the McPhersons, commanded by Clued McPherson,[408] their Chief, who behaved most gallantly on this occasion; and most pleasing it was, to see the champions come into Carlisle, loaded with the spoils of their enemies.[409]

We stayed all night in Lancaster, and the next day, I went to meet my Colonel, who, mounted at the head of his troops, included me in his corps. That day, we were ordered to march in the rear of the army, and as we left the town, the enemy immediately took control of it and followed us for a short distance, so we weren't sure of their intentions. However, when they soon returned, we continued on to Kendal without any significant events, where we stayed overnight and made the town pay for its past treatment of us. We then continued our retreat in terrible weather and bad roads to Carlisle, but due to the harsh conditions, we had to shorten our march and stop for the night at a village called Shap, where we suffered greatly due to the poor accommodations. Nevertheless, we all gathered early the next morning. A few of us made it to Carlisle that night. But I must mention an incident that occurred at Clifton: the enemy’s advance guard, led by General Honeywood, had gotten ahead of us and set an ambush near our planned route, hiding behind hedges to cut us off as we approached. However, we unknowingly walked right into their trap, but fortunately, we held our ground and managed to counter their attack, killing and capturing many of them while sending the rest fleeing. General Honeywood barely escaped, losing an arm and sustaining serious injuries. This brave action was largely thanks to the McPhersons, led by Clued McPherson, their Chief, who acted with great valor on this occasion; it was very satisfying to see the champions enter Carlisle, laden with the spoils of their enemies.

The whole army being now in Carlisle, our thoughts lay for some time suspended in order to act for the best; for we supposed that the enemy would come and give us battle. I cannot say that we somewhat waited them, but finding they did not, it was judged proper after two days’ stay and deliberation, to continue our march farther North, and to leave at Carlisle the few English who were with the army and about three hundred Scots. But of this proceeding I can say nothing farther, leaving to the world to judge as they think proper. The English then were about two hundred men; for many had quitted and returned home being unwilling to go to Scotland. Now some there are, who censure the Prince for leaving them at Carlisle, thinking it was out of disregard and a desire of being rid of them: but if they will pry a little more narrowly into the affair they will find, that it was the desire of Mr. Townley Colonel of the English who not only petitioned the Prince in his own name, but in the name of all the officers of the Regiment, to be left there, though the latter never assented to or desired it, many of them wishing to undergo the same fate as their Royal Master. However on Mr. Townley’s coming back and[Pg 187] telling them that it was the Prince’s pleasure that they should remain at Carlisle, they all, taking it as coming from the Prince, most willingly acquiesced, shewing true English bravery in any situation to obey:—and now, seeing themselves deprived of the satisfaction of following him they so greatly loved, they resolved to accompany him still in their hearts—all that was in their power. They shewed a true generosity in disposing of all that was not of immediate use to them, viz., their horses and riding-equipage, to all who stood in need; and though I seemed somewhat picqued at them in the beginning of this Narrative, I must ingenuously own, that they were a set of brave men; and though it is often objected to them, that they were not of an extraordinary rank, yet they behaved so as to make those of a nobler birth blush; for, from the time they had the honour of joining the Prince’s standard, they never sought pay either for themselves or their men, honourably maintaining and supporting the Regiment themselves:—Unhappy Gentlemen! They merited a much better fate than what was awaiting them![410]

The whole army was now in Carlisle, and we took some time to think things over to act wisely, as we expected the enemy to come and fight us. I can't say we were just waiting for them, but since they didn't show up, we decided after two days of staying and discussing that we should move further north and leave behind the few English soldiers who were with us and about three hundred Scots. I won’t comment further on this decision, leaving it for others to judge as they see fit. The English at that point were about two hundred men; many had left to return home, not wanting to go to Scotland. Some criticize the Prince for leaving them in Carlisle, believing it showed a lack of concern and a desire to be rid of them. However, if they looked more closely, they would see it was actually Mr. Townley, Colonel of the English, who requested to stay there not just for himself but for all the officers in the Regiment, even though many of them wanted to share the same fate as their Royal Master. When Mr. Townley returned and informed them it was the Prince’s wish for them to remain in Carlisle, they accepted it willingly, showing true English bravery in following orders. Now, knowing they couldn't follow him physically, they resolved to support him in spirit as much as they could. They displayed great generosity by giving away everything they didn’t urgently need, like their horses and riding gear, to those who required it. Although I seemed a bit annoyed with them at the start of this narrative, I must honestly admit that they were a group of brave men; and while some may argue they weren't of high rank, their actions put those of nobler birth to shame. From the moment they joined the Prince’s standard, they never sought pay for themselves or their men, honorably maintaining and supporting their Regiment by themselves. Unfortunate gentlemen! They deserved a much better fate than what awaited them!

Every thing being now in readiness, we began our march, in order (alas! as it happened) to bid adieu to Old England for ever! On the 22nd of December 1745[411] (being the Prince’s birthday) about four o’Clock in the afternoon, we crossed the river Esk, which separates the two kingdoms. The deepness and rapidity of the river, joined to the obscurity of the night, made it most terrible: but the good Prince, here, in particular, animated the men; and how noble was it to see these Champions, who had refused him nothing now marching breast-deep,[Pg 188] one supporting another, till wonderfully we all passed safe. The Duke of Perth here signalized himself much by his goodness; for, crossing the river several times on horseback, he took behind him several of the common Soldiers, whose strength was not sufficient to bear up against the current. Nor was the Prince wanting in giving a notable specimen of his generosity and condescension to his subjects, in imitation of the Great Alexander, who, in his expedition into Persia, suffered a poor Soldier, much fatigued, to repose himself in the king’s chair, which till then it had been death for anyone but himself to sit in. So the Prince I think, imitates, or fully equals, this great hero in point of affability to his men; for, taking on horseback a common soldier behind him, he carried him over the water, giving us all a great example of goodness and courage to follow him. But at this river I narrowly escaped drowning; for in crossing it, and being near the middle of the stream I perceived two women (tho’ never an army was known with so few) rolling down it and in imminent danger of perishing if I did not guide my horse in order to stop them: and I had like to have paid dearly for it, for coming against me, they laid hold of me in such a manner, that I was not able to dismount; and being so beset by the two women, and my horse, who was none of the biggest, going down the stream with me, I gave myself up for lost. I did not, however, lose courage and conduct in managing my horse as well as I could; and perceiving a man mounted upon a very high horse wading where I was swimming, I called to him for assistance. He seeing me in that piteous case, came immediately, and rescued me from the imminent danger I was in of perishing, and freed me also with a great deal of difficulty from my two companions: but how I got quit of them or out of the water, I remained an entire stranger; being come to the other side, I was immediately seized with a great panic and trembling from the fright of the danger I had so narrowly escaped, and in this state I continued for three or four hours notwithstanding all the efforts I could make against it. That night however, being, as I said, on the other side,[Pg 189] somewhat before the rest, I saw them come almost half round together with my deliverer, to whom I did not fail to pay my most hearty thanks, as the poor women did to me.

Everything being ready, we started our march, unfortunately to say goodbye to Old England forever! On December 22, 1745—on the Prince's birthday—around four in the afternoon, we crossed the river Esk, which separates the two kingdoms. The river's depth and speed, combined with the darkness of the night, made it quite terrifying. But the good Prince inspired the men here, and it was impressive to see these champions, who had given him nothing but support, now marching through the water, helping one another until, remarkably, we all got across safely. The Duke of Perth distinguished himself with his kindness; he crossed the river multiple times on horseback, taking several common soldiers behind him who didn’t have the strength to fight against the current. The Prince also showed notable generosity and humility toward his subjects, much like Great Alexander, who let a tired soldier rest in his chair during his campaign in Persia—something that had been a death sentence for anyone else before him. The Prince, I think, mimicked or matched this great hero in friendliness. He took a common soldier on his horse behind him and carried him across the water, setting a great example of goodness and courage for us to follow. However, at this river, I almost drowned. As I crossed and was near the middle, I saw two women (though there were hardly any soldiers around) being swept away and in serious danger of drowning if I didn’t steer my horse to stop them. I nearly paid dearly for this, as they grabbed onto me in such a way that I couldn't dismount. Being surrounded by the two women and my horse, who was not the largest, I thought I was done for. Nevertheless, I kept my composure and did my best to manage my horse. I noticed a man on a very tall horse wading where I was struggling, so I called for help. Seeing my desperate situation, he quickly came and saved me from the imminent danger I faced and managed, with great difficulty, to extricate me from the two women. I didn’t know how I got free or out of the water, but once I reached the other side, I was immediately overtaken by fear and trembling from the close call I had just experienced, and I remained in that state for about three or four hours despite my efforts to shake it off. That night, as I mentioned, on the other side, ahead of the others, I saw them approach, nearly all together along with my rescuer, to whom I made sure to express my heartfelt gratitude, just as the poor women did to me.

But here let us stop and take a short View of the Army’s behaviour whilst in England. It may be said, and is allowed even by the judgment of our enemies, that never such an army could be expected to behave as they did, giving the greatest marks of generosity to our enemies, paying for what they had, and revenging or oppressing few or none; and shewing to the World, that a noble design rather than either malice, rapine or plundering, was at the bottom of our proceedings. But as I may perhaps be suspected of partiality towards them, I shall refer the Reader to what was acknowledged by one of our greatest enemies, viz., one Parson Bissett in Aberdeen,[412] who was one of the heads of the Presbytery, and much esteemed by his own party for his morals and great talents as a preacher. This Gentleman, mounting the pulpit, soon after we had left Aberdeen, and while Cumberland’s Army was there, began his Sermon with a comparison betwixt us and those then in town, saying: ‘When the Prince, as they call him, was here,[413] I made it my business night and day to inspect their conduct, and observe their most minute actions; and instead of finding subjects of complaint, I found much to the contrary, and drew honey whence I thought it was not to be extracted. I heard what they said and did; and I heard of no robbery, of[Pg 190] no ill towards the people: but since these men are come amongst us, what is the secret that is not revealed? What is holy, that is not polluted? What’s forbid, that’s not transgressed? and in fine, where is God or Man obeyed? Here, cursing and blaspheming; there Drunkenness, Whoredom and Debauchery are carried on in full career, and reign with unlimited sway.’ So, going on in this strain, he concluded by telling his auditors, that it was a shame to be out-done by us; that, in punishment for their sins, nothing less than the curse of God could fall upon them, and make instruments of us to punish them.

But let's pause here and take a quick look at the Army's behavior while in England. It can be said, and even recognized by our enemies, that no army was ever expected to act as they did, showing remarkable generosity towards our foes, paying for what they took, and avenging or oppressing few, if any. They demonstrated to the world that a noble cause was the motivation behind our actions, instead of malice, theft, or pillaging. However, since I might be seen as biased in their favor, I will refer the reader to the words of one of our most significant critics, a certain Parson Bissett in Aberdeen, who was a leader in the Presbytery and highly regarded by his own party for his morals and preaching skills. This gentleman, upon taking the pulpit soon after we left Aberdeen and while Cumberland’s Army was present, began his sermon by comparing us to those currently in town, stating: ‘When the Prince, as they call him, was here, I made it my mission day and night to observe their conduct and watch their smallest actions; and rather than finding grounds for complaint, I discovered much to the contrary, drawing sweetness from what I thought could offer none. I listened to their words and actions; and I heard of no thefts, no harm done to the people. But since these men have come among us, what secrets remain hidden? What is pure that isn’t tainted? What’s forbidden that’s not broken? And ultimately, where is God or Man obeyed? Here, there’s cursing and blasphemy; there’s drunkenness, promiscuity, and debauchery running rampant, ruling without restraint.’ Continuing in this manner, he ended by telling his audience that it was a shame to be outdone by us; that, as punishment for their sins, nothing less than the curse of God could fall upon them, using us as instruments of their punishment.

But now I shall return again to the river Esk. Having wonderfully got safe over, we marched all that night through excessively bad roads, all of us being very wet and cold, without any refreshment, except what we had before we left Carlisle, till ten o’Clock the next day, when we arrived at Dumfries; and extraordinary it was to see the Army, notwithstanding all their fatigue, come in as merry and gay as if they had only marched that morning. At our entrance into the Town, we saw the great rejoicing that had been made for our defeat, the candles being still in the windows, and the bonfires unextinguished. And now it was, that being in Scotland, my Colonel began to shew me great civility upon account of my being an Englishman, and so did afterwards several of the gentlemen of that country; for seeing me amongst them, they thought they could scarce do enough for me, especially my Colonel, who, for fear of my being any time badly quartered, ordered that I should always be lodged chez lui. So that from that time I had ordinarily his quarters, and sometimes a part of his bed, when there happened to be no other, so that I had every reason to be satisfied with my lot, having such resource of comfort in all my difficulties.

But now I will return to the river Esk. We managed to get across safely and marched all night through really terrible roads, all of us soaked and cold, without any food except what we had before leaving Carlisle, until 10 o'clock the next day, when we reached Dumfries. It was remarkable to see the Army, despite their exhaustion, come in as cheerful and lively as if they had just started marching that morning. As we entered the town, we saw the celebrations that had taken place over our defeat, with candles still in the windows and bonfires still burning. At that moment, being in Scotland, my Colonel began to show me great kindness because I was an Englishman, and several gentlemen from the area did too; seeing me among them, they felt they could hardly do enough for me, especially my Colonel, who, worried that I might be poorly housed, ordered that I should always stay at his place. From then on, I usually had his quarters, sometimes even sharing his bed when there was no other option, so I had every reason to be content with my situation, having such a source of comfort in all my struggles.

After we had halted two days at Dumfries, and made them pay for their past behaviour,[414] we marched on for[Pg 191] Hamilton; and here the Prince, attended by a few of his gentlemen, went to take the diversion of shooting in the Park; in which he behaved to the admiration and surprise of all present, killing or hitting every thing he shot at, so that, without flattery, he was looked upon to be the best marksman in the army. After we had staid some time at Hamilton, we continued our march to one of the prittiest (but most whiggish) towns in all Scotland, viz., Glasgow. Here we arrived on the 25th of December, 1745, much to their confusion, and halted six or seven days.[415] That Town had given, when the Prince marched for England, five thousand pounds for its good behaviour, and paid us now as much over again for breaking the same, rebelling against us, and raising the Militia in our absence. So we taught them more wit, how to break their words another time. The Army having been here provided with cloathing and other necessaries, of which they were very much in want, the Prince resolved to make a general inspection and review of them. Accordingly orders were issued one morning for that purpose, for us all to repair to a place at a little distance from the Town. So we marched out with drums beating, colours flying, bag-pipes playing, and all the marks of a triumphant army to the appointed ground, attended by multitudes of people, who had come from all parts to see us, and especially the ladies, who before were much against us, were now, charmed at the sight of the Prince, become most loyal;[416][Pg 192] and many afterwards, when they could not testify it to us by their good offices, did it in imitation in their hearts. I am somewhat at a loss to give a description of the Prince at this Review. No object could be more charming, no personage more taking, no deportment more agreeable, than his at that time was, for, being well mounted and princely attired,[417] having, too, great endowments both of body and mind, he appeared to bear a sway above any comparison with the heroes of the last ages, and the majesty and grandeur he seemed to display most noble and divine. The Army being now drawn up in all form, and every one putting himself out for the best, the Prince rode through the ranks, greatly encouraging and delighting all who saw him. After the Review we returned again to Glasgow; and about this time the unhappy news reached us, that Carlisle was invested by Cumberland, who, having got up cannon from Whitehaven, was in a fair way of taking it.

After we spent two days in Dumfries and made them pay for their past behavior, we marched on to Hamilton. Here, the Prince, accompanied by a few of his men, went shooting in the Park. He amazed everyone around by hitting or killing everything he aimed at, and without exaggeration, he was considered the best marksman in the army. After staying for a while in Hamilton, we continued our march to one of the prettiest (but most Whig-leaning) towns in Scotland, Glasgow. We arrived on December 25, 1745, to their shock, and stayed for six or seven days. That town had previously given five thousand pounds for good behavior when the Prince marched for England, and now they paid us the same amount again for breaking that promise, rebelling against us, and raising the Militia while we were away. So we taught them a lesson about keeping their word next time. The Army, having received clothing and other supplies it desperately needed, prompted the Prince to decide on a general inspection and review. Orders were issued one morning for everyone to gather at a spot a little ways from town. We marched out with drums beating, colors flying, bagpipes playing, and all the signs of a triumphant army to the designated area, attended by crowds of people who had come from all over to see us, especially the ladies, who had previously opposed us but were now charmed by the sight of the Prince and had become quite loyal; and many, unable to show it through their actions, demonstrated their loyalty in their hearts instead. I'm somewhat at a loss to describe the Prince during this Review. No sight could be more captivating, no figure more striking, no demeanor more pleasing than his at that moment. Well-mounted and richly dressed, with great physical and mental qualities, he seemed to surpass comparison with the heroes of past ages, exuding a noble and divine majesty. The Army, now fully assembled and everyone on their best behavior, the Prince rode through the ranks, greatly encouraging and delighting all who looked on. After the Review, we returned to Glasgow; and around this time, we received the unfortunate news that Carlisle was under siege by Cumberland, who had brought cannons from Whitehaven and was close to taking it.

It being now judged proper to continue our march for Stirling, we quitted Glasgow in a handsome manner, and soon sat down before that town, which we took after two or three days’ cannonading, and then began the siege of the Castle, having just received a few pieces of Cannon from France, which would have been sufficient, as many are pleased to say, if our Engineer, viz., one Mirabell,[418] a Frenchman by birth, had been good for any thing: but erecting our batteries in an improper place against the Castle, we spent three weeks’ labour in vain; during which time news arrived from Carlisle, by Mr. Brown,[419][Pg 193] who was left Lieutenant Colonel by the Prince, and one Mr. Maxwell,[420] who made their escape over the wall while the Articles of Capitulation were signing. These gentlemen acquainted us, that, after Cumberland had lain six or seven weeks before the town, and heralds had been frequently sent in to summons it to surrender, Mr. Hamilton, Governor of the Castle had at last resolved to obey them but whether with a true fear or promise of his life, is disputed. Certain however it is, that he employed that villainous Wier, whom I have mentioned before (being left a prisoner at Carlisle) with secret Messages to and from the enemy; and instead of hanging him, invited him daily to his own table. How far this conduct was good, I leave the world to judge.

Now that it was deemed appropriate to continue our march to Stirling, we left Glasgow in style and soon set up camp outside that town, which we captured after two or three days of cannon fire. We then started the siege of the Castle, having just received a few cannons from France, which many claim would have been enough if our engineer, Mirabell—a Frenchman by birth—had been competent. However, by placing our batteries improperly against the Castle, we wasted three weeks of effort. During that time, we received news from Carlisle, via Mr. Brown, who had been left as Lieutenant Colonel by the Prince, and one Mr. Maxwell, who escaped over the wall while the articles of capitulation were being signed. These gentlemen informed us that after Cumberland had besieged the town for six or seven weeks, and after numerous heralds had been sent to demand its surrender, Mr. Hamilton, the Governor of the Castle, had finally decided to comply. Whether this was out of genuine fear or a promise for his life is up for debate. What is certain, though, is that he employed the treacherous Wier, whom I previously mentioned (having been left a prisoner at Carlisle), to send secret messages to and from the enemy. Instead of executing him, he invited him to his own table daily. How wise this decision was, I leave for others to judge.

Mr. Townley, Governor of the Town, being informed that the resolution to capitulate was taken, endeavoured, seconded by his whole corps, officers and soldiers, to oppose him: but finding no means effective to hinder the place from being given up, he was obliged to send, by Hamilton’s direction, articles of Capitulation to Cumberland, who returned for answer That the Town and Castle should be surrendered at discretion, and that the Officers and Soldiers should be at his Father’s Mercy, with whom he promised to intercede for their safety. How sincerely he behaved in this, is sufficiently known:[421] and when I reflect upon this, I think I may say I have good fortune, in leaving that unhappy town and regiment, that I was not on some gallows or other made a partaker also of his clemency! This news was at first hard to be believed amongst us: but it appearing but too true, the Prince was exceedingly troubled, and lamented much the loss of his subjects,[Pg 194] especially the English, who were to be made sacrifices of; and also did generally the whole army, many of them wishing they had been there, nay even to be made victims of to Cumberland’s fury!

Mr. Townley, the Governor of the Town, learned that the decision to surrender had been made and tried, with the support of his entire team of officers and soldiers, to resist it. However, finding no effective way to prevent the town from being handed over, he had no choice but to send, per Hamilton’s instructions, the terms of surrender to Cumberland. Cumberland replied that the Town and Castle would be surrendered at his discretion, and that the Officers and Soldiers would be at the mercy of his father, with whom he promised to plead for their safety. How sincerely he acted in this is well known: [421] and when I think about it, I feel fortunate to be leaving that unfortunate town and regiment, as I could have easily ended up on some gallows and also been a recipient of his mercy! Initially, this news was hard for us to believe, but when it became clear it was true, the Prince was greatly disturbed and mourned the loss of his subjects, particularly the English, who were to be sacrificed; the entire army felt the same way, with many wishing they had been there, even to become victims of Cumberland's wrath![Pg 194]

We had now scarce got well into the siege of the Castle, before news came, on the other hand, that General Hawley was advancing towards us with about eleven or twelve thousand men. The Prince’s Army at this time amounted to about eight thousand effective men, having been joined by Lord John Drummond’s Regiment, and Lord Lewis Gordon’s, of whom I have spoken before, and some few others. So, seeing we must inevitably fight we endeavoured to prepare ourselves in the best manner for that purpose. The enemy, we heard, were now come to Falkirk, which was only eight or ten miles distant from us. We waited two days in expectation of their coming on to attack us: but finding that they continued at Falkirk, we on the third morning, leaving a sufficient force for the siege of Stirling, boldly marched out in quest of them. And here it was the soldiers shewed the greatest alacrity; the foot marching with such celerity as kept the horse on a full trot, so that by two o’Clock in the afternoon we came up with them, notwithstanding we almost marched round them, in order to have the wind somewhat favourable for us. And now the day, from being an exceeding fine one, became on a sudden obscure; the sun which till then shone upon us, was now as it were eclipsed, and all the elements in confusion, so that the heavens seemed to fulminate their anger down upon us, by the impetuous storm of hail, wind and rain, that fell just at the time of the engagement. The enemy at this time scarcely knew any thing of our march towards them till it had been almost too late; as they lay in an entire security and defiance of us, thinking it not worth their while to take the necessary precaution of having spies out, as other prudent Generals would have done, notwithstanding the contempt they might have had for us. We now roused them out of their lethargy, being just upon them at their going to dinner. Cursing their bad[Pg 195] fortune, they immediately mounted and turned out of their camp, somewhat in confusion to meet us, which they did at a short distance from it, though not to our disadvantage.

We had barely started the siege of the Castle when we heard that General Hawley was approaching us with about eleven or twelve thousand troops. At that point, the Prince’s Army had around eight thousand effective men, bolstered by Lord John Drummond’s Regiment, Lord Lewis Gordon’s, and a few others. Realizing we had no choice but to fight, we tried to prepare ourselves as best we could. We learned that the enemy had reached Falkirk, which was only eight or ten miles away from us. We waited for two days expecting them to attack, but when it became clear they were staying at Falkirk, on the third morning, we left enough forces to continue the siege of Stirling and boldly marched out to find them. It was at this moment the soldiers showed incredible enthusiasm; the infantry marched so quickly that the cavalry had to keep up at a full trot, and by two o'clock in the afternoon, we caught up with them, despite having marched around them to gain a favorable wind. Suddenly, a beautiful day turned gloomy; the sun, which had been shining, seemed to disappear, and the elements turned chaotic, as a fierce storm of hail, wind, and rain hit us right as we were about to engage. The enemy had little awareness of our advance until it was nearly too late, as they sat in complete security and disregard for us, thinking it wasn't worth it to have spies out, unlike other wise generals might have done, despite any scorn they may have felt towards us. We shook them out of their complacency just as they were heading to dinner. Cursing their bad luck, they quickly mounted and stumbled out of their camp, somewhat confused, to face us, though it didn’t disadvantage us.

Their cavalry was in front of their left wing, unsupported with foot; and their infantry in the right, unsupported by horse: but the day being so excessively bad, hindered their cannon from coming up, so that we were upon an equal footing with them in that respect, we bringing none with us. We were about four hundred light Horse ordered to face the enemy’s dragoons, being fronted and supported by a strong line of McDonells; and our foot, with the Prince, against their foot. Here I must acknowledge, that when I saw this moving cloud of horse, regularly disciplined, in full trott upon us down the summit, I doubted not but that they would have ridden over us without opposition (I mean the front line) and bear us down without difficulty in their impetuous progress: but I soon found myself mistaken; for immediately upon our bearing upon them in order to meet them, there blew such a storm of wind and hail, which was before on our side, and now turned miraculously, as we turned, on our backs; and notwithstanding that almost disabled us to bear up against them, it so harrassed the enemy, that cursing and blaspheming was made the dying-speech of many of them. And now kind Heaven seemed to declare for us.

Their cavalry was in front of their left flank, without support from infantry; and their infantry was on the right, without support from cavalry. However, the terrible weather prevented their cannons from advancing, which put us on equal ground since we hadn’t brought any ourselves. We were about four hundred light horsemen tasked with facing the enemy’s dragoons, backed by a strong line of McDonells; while our infantry, alongside the Prince, confronted their foot soldiers. I must admit that when I saw that organized wave of horsemen galloping down the hill toward us, I feared they would easily charge over us (referring to the front line) and overrun us in their aggressive advance. But I soon realized I was wrong; as we prepared to meet them, an intense storm of wind and hail suddenly shifted against us, and despite nearly crippling our efforts, it tormented the enemy so much that many of them were cursing and swearing in their last moments. At that moment, it felt like divine intervention was on our side.

The brave front-line of McDonells suffered the enemy to come within ten or twelve paces of them before firing. Nobly altogether presented, and sent their benediction upon them, so that in the third part of a minute that rapid and impetuous torrent, which seemed in rolling to lay all waste before it, was now checked and stemmed in such a manner, that it was made to retake its course faster than it had proceeded. Upon seeing this, we immediately seconded our work with a hearty huzza, victory now declaring for us. But on the Prince’s wing it remained somewhat more obstinate: yet soon after they returned the same, having happily finished their affair with scarce the loss of forty men, and we had only[Pg 196] one wounded. We now pursued them sharply for about sixty paces, and fetched down a good many of them: but unfortunately being ordered to halt, when a little further pursued would have finished our affair, we let an opportunity slip out of our hands, which never afterwards presented itself again. This piece of conduct belonged chiefly to Lord George Murray,[422] who would not permit the army to pursue any farther. So being ordered to halt, we modestly bid our enemies retire, and as it were tell them to come better provided another time. Here I could say something more: but I cannot at present; therefore I’ll say nothing, leaving it to Midwife Time to say it for me, and contenting myself with halting with the army.

The brave front line of McDonells allowed the enemy to come within ten or twelve paces before firing. They presented themselves nobly and sent their blessings upon the enemy, causing that rapid and fierce surge, which seemed ready to destroy everything in its path, to be halted and redirected faster than it had advanced. Seeing this, we immediately supported our efforts with a loud cheer, as victory now favored us. However, on the Prince’s flank, it was a bit more stubborn at first; yet soon after, they managed to turn the tide as well, achieving their goal with barely forty men lost, while we had only[Pg 196] one wounded. We then pursued them aggressively for about sixty paces, taking down quite a few. Unfortunately, we were ordered to stop when just a bit more pursuit would have resolved the situation, and we let an opportunity slip away that never came back. This decision was mainly due to Lord George Murray, who wouldn't allow the army to continue the chase. So, being told to stop, we modestly urged our enemies to retreat, as if to suggest they come better prepared next time. I could say more about this, but I can’t at the moment, so I’ll refrain, leaving it to Time to address it for me while I settle in with the army.

And now after four or five hours’ halt, we heard, that we might go, if we pleased, and take possession of the town. So the army was ordered immediately to enter the town, and about eighteen of us Guards, who were present, to go about three miles off, and take fifty-four of the enemy prisoners. When we arrived at the house, where they had got together they shut the door against us. We therefore surrounded the house, and summoned them immediately to surrender:—which they refusing at first to do, we fired into the house—and they immediately gave themselves up to our mercy. So, after taking them and fifty-four stand of arms, we conducted them Prisoners into Falkirk that night. And here it was, that I happened to perform an action which gave me great comfort afterward in my distress.—A fine young boy, who was somewhat out of order, being found in the house after all was almost done, was espied by some of our party, who bringing him out asked who would take care of him. I told them to give him to me, which they immediately did. The young boy, being now in my possession, says to me:[Pg 197] ‘I hope Your Honour will not kill me.’ Upon which, being a little surprised at what he said, I asked him, ‘Have you not well merited it?’ ‘If I may be permitted to speak to Your Honour,’ replied he, ‘I own I am taken in an unhappy affair, which neither malice nor inclination drew me into. But the Head of the Country, notwithstanding I was the only child of my aged parents, insisted, under great penalties, on my coming in to join him; so that I beg you will pity me in my condition: but if it must be that I die this night, pray! tell me what death you think it will be?’ Upon which, not knowing what to think or what to say, I was somewhat at a loss: his telling me of his aged parents, and his simplicity touched me much: and how far I may be censured for my after-conduct, I know not; but those who think I did amiss, I hope, will pardon me, as being then but a young warrior. True, such a thing, I know, ought not to have been publicly done; yet, when an opportunity presented itself of doing an Act of Mercy without harm to the Cause, I am convinced that this my behaviour will, with all generous minds, escape reproof. The young boy continuing his lamentations, I told him to be of good courage, for death was not so imminent as he expected; at which he seemed to respire new vigor and life: And after some questions asked, and promises made of his ever being grateful and upon his telling me, that his home was not above fourteen miles from thence, I asked him, if he could privately slip away thither. He replied, such a favor would be too great for him to presume to request: So telling him to do it if he could, I discharged him, ordering him to be a support to his poor aged parents.

After a break of four or five hours, we heard that we could go and take control of the town if we wanted to. So the army was ordered to enter the town immediately, and about eighteen of us Guards who were present were sent about three miles away to capture fifty-four enemy prisoners. When we reached the house where they had gathered, they barred the door against us. We surrounded the house and demanded that they surrender. They initially refused, so we shot into the house, and they quickly surrendered to us. After taking them and fifty-four weapons, we brought the prisoners to Falkirk that night. It was during this time that I ended up doing something that later brought me great comfort during my distress. A young boy, who seemed to be unwell, was found in the house after everything was nearly over. Some of our group spotted him and brought him out, asking who would take care of him. I told them to give him to me, which they did. The boy, now in my custody, said to me, “I hope you won’t kill me.” I was a bit surprised by his words and asked him, “Don’t you deserve it?” He replied, “If I may speak to you, I admit I’m in a tough situation, though I didn’t intend to be part of it. The leader of the area, despite me being the only child of my elderly parents, insisted that I join him under great threats. So I ask you to have compassion for me in my situation. But if I must die tonight, please tell me what kind of death you think it will be?” Unsure of what to think or say, I felt a bit lost. His mention of his elderly parents and his innocence moved me deeply. I don’t know how I might be judged for my actions afterward; perhaps those who think I was wrong will forgive me, as I was just a young soldier at the time. True, I know such a thing shouldn't have been done publicly, yet when the chance arose to show mercy without harming our cause, I believe that my actions will find approval in the eyes of kind-hearted people. As the boy continued to lament, I told him to be brave, as death was not as imminent as he thought; he seemed to gain new strength and life at this. After some questions and promises made about his gratitude, and when he told me his home was not more than fourteen miles away, I asked him if he could sneak away there. He replied that such a favor would be too much for him to ask. I told him to go if he could, and I let him go, instructing him to be a support to his poor elderly parents.

And now by this time we had almost conducted our prisoners to Falkirk; and, after delivering them, we went thoroughly wet and cold, to repose ourselves a little while on straw, and some in the open fields or air, all places being by this time entirely filled, so that it was then impossible to find any resource or ease for our excessive hunger, wet and cold. So resting a few hours in that condition, they soon after appeared; and when[Pg 198] light, we went to see the field of the slain; and number being made of them, we found near seven hundred of the enemy slain, and about fifty of ours, which were immediately interred. But this cheap-bought victory, you will say, merited a better exit! The most distinguished among the slain were Colonel Whitney and Sir Robert Monro, who was heard much to blaspheme during the engagement, and as a punishment for which, his tongue was miraculously cut asunder by a sword, that struck him directly across the mouth. His brother, a physician, was likewise killed at his side.[423] There were likewise found slain, some Presbyterian Parsons,[424] who, fired with holy zeal, had quitted their Bibles and took their swords. It was said, that one of these Parsons, seeing the danger he was in of losing his life as a Soldier, had recourse to his dignity, supposing that would be a cloak to save him. ‘Spare my life,’ said he to a Highlander, who was on the point of taking it, ‘for I am a Minister of My Master Jesus Christ!’ To which the other ingeniously replied: ‘If you are a good one, your Master has need of you; if[Pg 199] not, it’s fitting that you go and take your punishment elsewhere!’—which dilemma was immediately solved by the Highlander’s sword. Another Minister, seeing the case his Brother was in, and being in a fair way to share the same fate, begged his life of another Highlander for Prince Charles’s sake, by which means he preserved what he would otherwise inevitably have lost.

And by now, we had almost brought our prisoners to Falkirk. After handing them over, we were soaked and cold, so we tried to rest a little while on straw, and some of us found spots in the open fields or air, but all places were completely filled. It was impossible to find any comfort for our intense hunger, wetness, and chill. After resting a few hours in that condition, they soon appeared; and when[Pg 198] it got light, we went to see the battlefield. We counted nearly seven hundred enemy dead and about fifty of our own, who were buried right away. But you might say this cheap victory deserved a better outcome! The most notable among the dead were Colonel Whitney and Sir Robert Monro, who was heard cursing a lot during the battle. As a punishment for this, his tongue was miraculously sliced in half by a sword that struck him directly across the mouth. His brother, a physician, was also killed beside him. [423] There were also some Presbyterian ministers found dead, [424] who, fueled by holy zeal, had put down their Bibles and picked up swords. It was said that one of these ministers, realizing he was in danger of losing his life as a soldier, tried to use his position as a shield, thinking it would save him. "Spare my life," he begged a Highlander who was about to kill him, "for I am a minister of my Master Jesus Christ!" The Highlander cleverly replied, "If you are a good one, your Master needs you; if not, it's fitting that you face your punishment elsewhere!"—which was quickly settled by the Highlander's sword. Another minister, seeing his brother’s plight and facing a similar fate, begged for his life from another Highlander for Prince Charles’s sake, and in this way, he saved what he would have otherwise inevitably lost.

We now took possession of the enemy’s baggage, camp, and eight pieces of cannon; which they had not time to carry off—besides a few prisoners, the chief of whom was Major Lockhart, who, after having his life given him, and his liberty upon his parole of honour, afterwards spurned against gratitude itself, by not only being heinously perjured, but more than ordinarily thirsty of those prisoners’ blood who just before had spared his life.[425]

We now took over the enemy's supplies, camp, and eight cannons, which they didn’t have time to take with them—along with a few prisoners, the most notable being Major Lockhart, who, after being spared, was granted his freedom on his word of honor, but then completely betrayed that trust by not only being incredibly ungrateful but also having an unusual thirst for the blood of those prisoners who had just saved his life.[425]

We had now about one-hundred prisoners, one of whom seeing his situation and ours, said with a grave countenance to his companion: ‘By my soul, Dick, if Prince Charles goes on in this way, Prince Frederick will never be King George!’ But of the five or six thousand men that went with the Prince to the field of battle, scarce three thousand returned back with him, for many of them, having loaded themselves with booty, returned up to the hills. It was now a great loss to us, that we had neither fort or other secure place to keep our prisoners in, so that, if it were not merely out of mercy, it was to no purpose to take prisoners, being without the means of keeping them.

We now had about one hundred prisoners, one of whom, realizing his situation and ours, said to his companion with a serious expression: ‘Honestly, Dick, if Prince Charles keeps this up, Prince Frederick will never become King George!’ But out of the five or six thousand men who went with the Prince to the battlefield, hardly three thousand returned with him, as many of them had loaded themselves with loot and headed back to the hills. It was a significant loss for us that we had no fort or any secure place to hold our prisoners, so that, unless it was out of mercy, it was pointless to take prisoners since we had no way to keep them.

And now being come again to Stirling, the enemy being fled to Edinburgh, and finding the siege of the Castle went on but slowly the spirit of the army began much to change. Factions, grudges, and private interest were now judged proper to be exercised, so that the Prince was in a mortifying situation, seeing himself deserted by half his army, and the others mightily turned. But as it is not for me to say more than what relates to myself, I shall only[Pg 200] mention the grudge I have often dearly paid for—that exercised against my Colonel, who, on the death of his brother had lately succeeded to the title of Lord Balmerino. And here it may be proper to give some account of the character of this brave man, which though sufficiently known, his praises cannot enough be sung. He was a man of a noble personage, of approved loyalty, and had the courage of a lion. He possessed a mind and genius well ornamented with both natural and acquired parts, being versed in most languages. He could recite whole pages of Horace, Ovid, and Virgil at his age of fifty-eight, as perfectly as a school-boy of sixteen, so that his memory for his years was wonderful, the more so for its not being in the least impaired by his hard drinking—his sole and predominant passion, which if he had a little more restrained, he would have shone with the same lustre in the army as he afterwards did on the scaffold. However, whilst with the Prince, he was never failing with his duty; and proud he was of having something, wherein he could shew his loyalty and obedience to his Master.

And now that we’ve returned to Stirling, with the enemy having fled to Edinburgh and the siege of the Castle moving along slowly, the morale of the army began to shift significantly. Factions, grudges, and personal interests were being prioritized, leaving the Prince in a frustrating position as he saw half of his army abandoning him and the rest turning against him. However, I will only mention the grudge I have often paid dearly for—that against my Colonel, who recently succeeded to the title of Lord Balmerino after his brother's death. It’s important to highlight the character of this brave man, who, although well-known, deserves even more praise. He was a man of noble stature, proven loyalty, and the courage of a lion. His mind and spirit were well-furnished with both natural talent and learned knowledge, and he was fluent in most languages. He could recite entire pages of Horace, Ovid, and Virgil at the age of fifty-eight just as flawlessly as a sixteen-year-old schoolboy, making his remarkable memory even more impressive given that it wasn't diminished by his heavy drinking—his one main passion, which, if he had restrained a bit more, would have allowed him to shine just as brightly in the army as he later did on the scaffold. Nevertheless, while he was with the Prince, he was always diligent in his duties and took pride in having something that showed his loyalty and obedience to his Master.

But what was the cause of the quarrel betwixt him and Lord George Murray, I know not; as Lord Balmerino did not ever directly inform us why he was treated after that manner: only I remember, His Lordship, when he saw himself so apparently ill-used, frequently addressed his corps as follows. ‘Come let us do as we are ordered! It is in vain to dispute; a time will come when I shall see all these things righted, and that too at Lord George’s cost or mine. But at present he is my superior, and we must obey as we tender the good of the Prince.’ With such soothing expressions has he often accosted us, when some were mutinying. And certainly he suffered a great deal from Lord George, for, to my knowledge, we have been ordered twenty or thirty miles, harassed and fatigued, and a courier sent after us, ordering us immediately to return without halting—saying it was my Lord George Murray’s orders.[426] And now a harder time than ever[Pg 201] came upon us, for I can safely say and prove, that from the time of Falkirk Affair to the Battle of Culloden, notwithstanding the fatigue of the day, I scarce slept three nights out of seven in bed.

But I don’t know what caused the fight between him and Lord George Murray, since Lord Balmerino never directly told us why he was treated that way. I do remember that His Lordship, when he felt so clearly mistreated, often addressed his troops with these words: “Let’s just do what we’ve been ordered! There’s no point in arguing; a time will come when I’ll see all these things made right, and it’ll be at either Lord George’s expense or mine. But for now, he’s my superior, and we must obey if we want to do well by the Prince.” He often reassured us with such calming words, especially when some were starting to rebel. And he certainly endured a lot because of Lord George; to my knowledge, we were ordered to march twenty or thirty miles, exhausted and worn out, only to have a courier sent after us, telling us to turn back immediately without stopping—saying it was Lord George Murray’s orders. And now we faced a tougher time than ever[Pg 201], because I can confidently say and prove that from the time of the Falkirk Affair to the Battle of Culloden, despite the day’s fatigue, I barely managed to sleep three nights out of seven in bed.

And now having been some time before Stirling Castle, news arrived from Edinburgh, that Cumberland was come thither with an intention to rally General Hawley’s army and attack us again. As our number had been so much diminished by the desertion of those who after the battle of Falkirk had gone home loaded with plunder; it was judged expedient for us to retire higher into the country, where we were sure of being joined by some more forces. Accordingly we had orders to proceed on our march; and on the morning on which we began it, the Prince to St. Ringin,[427] distant about half a mile from Stirling, to give the necessary directions for quitting the town and raising the siege; which being done, we retired again, and when at a short distance, we were surprized with a hideous noise just behind us; and upon the Prince’s sending back to inquire what it was, it was found to be a church blown up, just upon the place where a few minutes before we had been standing. This church had been converted into a magazine for our gun-powder, which by some accident had been set on fire, and several of the town’s-people and of our soldiers were killed by the explosion. However, continuing our march, we arrived that night at Crieff a little town in the Highlands; and the Prince lodged at Drummond Castle, the residence of the illustrious Duke of Perth, which was only a short distance from the said town. And now it was judged proper for the army to separate; accordingly the Prince went the Highland way with the Highlanders and prisoners for Inverness; and the Horse and Lowland Regiments the Low-Country Road by the Sea-Coast,[Pg 202] which was much longer, so that it was three or four weeks before we again formed a junction.

And after spending some time near Stirling Castle, we got word from Edinburgh that Cumberland had arrived with plans to regroup General Hawley’s army and attack us once more. Since our numbers had dwindled considerably due to the desertion of those who returned home with loot after the battle of Falkirk, we decided it was wise to move further into the countryside, where we could expect to join up with more forces. So, we were ordered to begin our march; and on the morning we set off, the Prince went to St. Ringin, about half a mile from Stirling, to give the necessary instructions for leaving the town and lifting the siege. Once that was done, we moved back, and when we were a short distance away, we were startled by a terrifying explosion right behind us; when the Prince sent someone back to find out what happened, we discovered that a church had been blown up at the spot where we had stood just moments before. This church had been turned into a storage place for our gunpowder, which had accidentally caught fire, killing several townspeople and soldiers in the explosion. Nonetheless, we continued our march and reached Crieff, a small town in the Highlands, that night. The Prince stayed at Drummond Castle, the residence of the famous Duke of Perth, which was not far from the town. Now it seemed appropriate for the army to split up; so the Prince took the Highland route with the Highlanders and prisoners towards Inverness, while the Horse and Lowland Regiments traveled the longer Low-Country Road along the coast, which meant it took three or four weeks before we reunited.

And now we marched from Crieff to Perth, a large fine town; from Perth to Cowpar-in-Angus; from Cowpar to Glams; from Glams to Forfar; and so on to Montrose. The reason why I am so short in mentioning these places, is, I have little to say; we passing them quickly, and nothing extraordinary happening. But at Montrose we halted a few days. It is a fine loyal seaport town and looked upon as I was told there, to produce men of the greatest wisdom in Scotland. Having staid three days there, we were a little surprised at the sight of ships of war, that appeared a little distance off the Coast: and the rumor being that Cumberland was pretty nigh us, we began to apprehend lest they should land and intercept our passage; to prevent which, we marched with all haste out of the town, the foot going out the third day at night, and the rest following early the next morning except the Hussars who remained some days longer to watch the enemy’s motions.

And now we marched from Crieff to Perth, a large, nice town; from Perth to Coupar-Angus; from Coupar to Glams; from Glams to Forfar; and then on to Montrose. The reason I'm brief about these places is that I don’t have much to say; we passed through quickly, and nothing remarkable happened. But in Montrose, we stayed a few days. It’s a beautiful, loyal seaport town, and I was told there that it produces some of the wisest men in Scotland. After three days there, we were a bit surprised by the sight of warships a little way off the coast: with rumors that Cumberland was nearby, we started to be concerned that they might land and cut off our passage. To prevent this, we hurriedly left the town, with the infantry departing on the third night and the rest following early the next morning, except for the Hussars, who stayed a few days longer to keep an eye on the enemy’s movements.

Some of my readers may be curious to know what sort of men these Hussars were. A set of braver fellows it would be very hard to find; many of them having mounted themselves on horses which they had taken from the enemy. Their Commander[428] also was a wise, courageous virtuous man, and behaved himself in his station to the admiration of all, regulating his corps with such order as to make our enemies and the country, even fifty miles distant from us, have more fear of them than almost the whole army. In fine, he was of infinite service to the Prince, as also were his horse; for their conduct was daring, and their courage was steeled, and few of them there were, who would have scrupled to go, if possible to hell’s gates to fetch away the keys.

Some of my readers might be curious about what kind of men these Hussars were. It would be tough to find a braver bunch; many of them had taken horses from the enemy for themselves. Their Commander—A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0—was also a wise, brave, and virtuous man who earned everyone's admiration by how he conducted himself in his position. He led his unit with such discipline that our enemies and even those living fifty miles away feared them more than nearly the entire army. In short, he was extremely helpful to the Prince, as were his men; their actions were bold, and their courage was unshakeable, with few hesitating to go, if necessary, to the gates of hell to retrieve the keys.

Soon after our departure from Montrose, we arrived at Aberdeen, where we staid two or three days; and notwithstanding our being in the town the Presbyterian Ministers ceased not to preach and pray publicly against[Pg 203] us. And here it was that I happened to be bedfellow to my Colonel, Lord Balmerino in the same bed where Cumberland afterwards lay, it being in one of the Chief Provosts’ houses.

Soon after we left Montrose, we got to Aberdeen, where we stayed for two or three days. Even though we were in town, the Presbyterian ministers continued to preach and pray publicly against us. It was here that I ended up sharing a bed with my Colonel, Lord Balmerino, in the same bed where Cumberland later slept, as it was in one of the Chief Provost's houses.

When we marched out of Aberdeen, it blew, snowed, hailed, and froze to such a degree, that few Pictures ever represented Winter, with all its icicles about it, better than many of us did that day; for here men were covered with icicles hanging at their eyebrows and beards; and an entire coldness seizing all their limbs, it may be wondered at how so many could bear up against the storm, a severe contrary wind driving snow and little cutting hail bitterly down upon our faces, in such a manner that it was impossible to see ten yards before us. And very easy it now was to lose our companions; the road being bad and leading over large commons, and the paths being immediately filled up with drifted snow. However, we continued marching on till about three in the afternoon, when my horse overcome by the inclemency of the weather, fairly gave it up and would carry me no farther: and now by a little halt I quickly lost my Company, and was obliged to alight and lead my horse leg-deep in snow; being upon a wide common, as it appeared to me, not having seen all that day’s march scarce a house, tree or barn. I now expected every moment to perish, as I was quite benumbed and all covered over with snow, and my horse refused to follow me. At last, unable to proceed any farther, I sunk down, quite exhausted, upon the snow. In this dreadful situation, I luckily recollected a little bottle of spirits, which had been given me by the Provost’s Lady; and accordingly tried to put my frozen hand into my riding-coat pocket to take it out. On taking a draught of the liquor, I soon found that never repose to the wearied traveller, never meat to a most ravenous hunger, never drink to a most burning thirst, could be more refreshing or agreeable than this was to me; and I should have finished my bottle, if a reflection had not come into my head about my poor horse, which seemed to be in as bad a situation as myself, being one of a delicate and tender[Pg 204] breed. Knowing that he could drink beer, I resolved to make an experiment whether he would partake of the contents of my bottle. So pouring the remainder of the liquor into the crown of my hat, which I had pressed low down for the purpose, and dissolving some snow in it, in order to mitigate the spirits, I gave it my poor horse to drink: which to my great surprise and pleasure, he did, his mouth, I believe, being so cold that he did not know what he drank. However, now finding ourselves to respire as it were new life and vigor, we endeavoured to proceed, and after three quarters of an hour, being almost upon the relapse again, we stumbled upon a house, and following the walls of it came to the door, where entering together with my horse, I surprized the poor people who were sitting at the fire. But they, seeing the condition I was in, received me with a great deal of good-nature, and permitted my horse to stand in the house till he was well rubbed, and then led him to a little place for him to lie in, giving him hay and corn as he wanted. After I had taken off my riding-coat and boots and well warmed and refreshed myself, I heard of two more (who had been in almost as bad a situation as myself except that their horses continued to carry them), who were come to the next house adjacent. So going out to see them, I found them to be two old acquaintances, vizt., one Mr. Maxwell, and Mr. Ball, an English Gentleman, who, after some chat, concluded, that two more harassing marches, than that over the Esk and the present, could scarcely be imagined. Accommodating ourselves as well as we could for that night, being obliged to lie with our horses, we departed early next morning for Old Meldrum, which place most of the army had reached before us.

When we left Aberdeen, the weather was brutal—blowing, snowing, hailing, and freezing to the point that few images of winter could capture it better than we did that day. Men were covered in icicles hanging from their eyebrows and beards, and the cold made every limb feel numb. It was astonishing that so many could endure the storm, with a harsh wind driving snow and sharp hail painfully against our faces, making it impossible to see more than ten yards ahead. It was easy to lose track of our companions; the roads were terrible, leading over wide expanses of open land, and the paths were quickly filled with drifting snow. Still, we pushed on until about three in the afternoon when my horse, overwhelmed by the harsh weather, gave up entirely and wouldn’t carry me any further. After a short break, I quickly lost sight of my group and had to dismount, leading my horse through snow that came up to my knees. Surrounded by open land and having not seen a house, tree, or barn all day, I feared I would perish at any moment, completely frozen and covered in snow, with my horse refusing to follow me. Eventually, too exhausted to go on, I collapsed onto the snow. In that terrible moment, I remembered a small bottle of spirits that the Provost’s Lady had given me. I managed to reach into my riding coat pocket with my frozen hand to retrieve it. Taking a sip of the liquor, I quickly realized that nothing could be more refreshing than this drink for a weary traveler, more satisfying than food for ravenous hunger, or more soothing than water for burning thirst. I almost finished the whole bottle, but then I remembered my poor horse, who seemed to be in just as bad a state as I was, being of a sensitive breed. Knowing he could drink beer, I decided to see if he would accept what was left in my bottle. I poured the remaining liquor into the crown of my hat, which I pressed down for that purpose, and mixed in some snow to lessen the strength of the spirits, then offered it to my horse. To my surprise and joy, he drank it, probably because his mouth was so cold he couldn’t even tell what it was. Feeling revitalized, we tried to move on, but after about forty-five minutes, just as I was about to give up again, we stumbled upon a house. We followed along its walls until we reached the door, and as we entered, I surprised the people sitting by the fire. However, seeing my condition, they treated me kindly and let my horse stand inside until he was well brushed off. They then took him to a small place to rest, providing him with hay and grain. After I took off my riding coat and boots and warmed up, I heard about two others who had been nearly as bad off as I was, except their horses had managed to carry them. I went outside to check on them and found they were two familiar faces: Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Ball, an English gentleman. After chatting for a bit, we agreed that few marches could be more exhausting than that over the Esk and the one we had just completed. That night, we made ourselves as comfortable as we could, sharing space with our horses, and set out early the next morning for Old Meldrum, where most of the army had arrived ahead of us.

From Old Meldrum we marched the next day for Banff, a little pretty agreeable town. About this time we heard, that the Highlanders, who were with the Prince, had broke down the barracks of Riven of Badenoch (which were a great eye-sore to them, having been built to keep them in order), and having taken the Sergeant and eleven[Pg 205] more prisoners, were in full march for Inverness, distant thence only twenty-four miles. And now, after a short stay at Banff, we marched for Cullen; and by this time we heard that the Prince had made himself master of the Lord President’s House, and after some little resistance forced the soldiers in the town of Inverness to retire into the Castle, which, after a regular siege, likewise soon surrendered at discretion. About 200 men were taken prisoners here, and several officers, the principal of whom were the Governor and the Master of Ross. This rapid success of the Prince gave us great courage. So, marching from Cullen, through Fochabers, over the River Spey, Elgin, Forres and Nairn, towns only ten miles distant from each other, we came to be greedy spectators of our dear Prince again, and what he with his brave Highlanders had effected. And now, to second our victorious arms, we were joined by several more of the Clans and Chiefs, and the brave Amazon Lady McIntosh,[429] Seaforth and others coming in, or causing their Clans to come in, and many who had left us at Falkirk rejoining their colours, greatly reinforced the army. When in this flourishing condition, it pleased the Prince to make a visit to the Duke of Gordon’s, whither all the Guards were ordered to attend him; and in going a curious fine standard with this motto ‘Britons, strike home!’ that was taken at Falkirk from Gardiner’s Dragoons, was honourably conferred upon me by the Prince at the head of the whole Troop; and I had the honor of carrying it ever after. Having passed Nairn, Forres, Elgin, and the river Spey, just at the other side under Fochabers, we came to the Duke’s seat.[430] What reception the Prince had, or what passed there I know not: but after a short stay we attended our Royal Master back again to Inverness. But as soon as we arrived there, we had orders to conduct some of the chief officers, who had lately been taken prisoners to Forres, and after leaving them there (they being upon their parole of honor) to go to Cullen[Pg 206] to inspect all affairs there on that side of the country, and to observe the motions of the enemy who lay at Aberdeen. While at Cullen, where we were continually upon the watch by our patrolling parties, we heard that Colonel Grant, a good French Officer, had with his Artillery taken Fort Augustus, and made the garrison prisoners; that a part of Fitz-James’ Horse had landed and joined the Prince;[431] and that Lord George Murray had blocked up seven hundred men in the Castle of Blair, when he behaved with a great deal of conduct and policy, for, he appeared before the Castle with only a few men, having hid most of the Highlanders with him in an adjacent wood. The garrison being thus deceived made a sally upon him with about three hundred men; but he immediately drew his party out of the wood and surrounded them, upon seeing which, they immediately surrendered.[432] So, sending them prisoners to Inverness he persevered in the siege of the Castle: but the approach of the Hessians soon obliged him to raise it and leave four hundred men remaining in the Castle.

From Old Meldrum, we marched the next day to Banff, a charming little town. Around this time, we heard that the Highlanders with the Prince had torn down the barracks of Riven of Badenoch (which they found unsightly, as they had been built to keep them in check) and had taken the Sergeant and eleven others prisoner. They were now on their way to Inverness, which was only twenty-four miles away. After a brief stay in Banff, we continued on to Cullen. By then, we learned that the Prince had taken control of the Lord President’s House and, after some resistance, forced the soldiers in the town of Inverness to retreat into the Castle, which soon surrendered after a regular siege. About 200 men were captured there, including several officers, notably the Governor and the Master of Ross. This quick success by the Prince boosted our morale. So, after leaving Cullen, we marched through Fochabers, crossed the River Spey, and passed through Elgin, Forres, and Nairn—towns only ten miles apart—eager to see our dear Prince once again and witness what he and his brave Highlanders had accomplished. In this victorious state, we were joined by more Clans and Chiefs, including the courageous Lady McIntosh, Seaforth, and others, along with many who had abandoned us at Falkirk returning to our ranks, which significantly strengthened the army. In this flourishing condition, the Prince decided to visit the Duke of Gordon's estate, to which all the Guards were ordered to accompany him. While traveling, a beautiful standard with the motto ‘Britons, strike home!’ was honorably presented to me by the Prince at the head of the entire Troop, and I had the honor of carrying it from then on. After passing Nairn, Forres, Elgin, and the River Spey, we arrived at the Duke’s residence just on the other side near Fochabers. I don’t know what kind of reception the Prince received or what happened there, but after a short visit, we returned to Inverness with our Royal Master. As soon as we arrived, we were ordered to take some of the key officers who had recently been captured to Forres, and after leaving them there (as they were on their honor), we went to Cullen to oversee affairs in that part of the country and to keep an eye on the enemy who was at Aberdeen. While in Cullen, where we were always on alert with our patrolling parties, we heard that Colonel Grant, a skilled French officer, had captured Fort Augustus with his artillery and taken the garrison prisoner. Part of Fitz-James’ Horse had landed and joined the Prince, and Lord George Murray had surrounded seven hundred men in the Castle of Blair, showing a lot of strategic skill. He approached the Castle with only a few men, hiding the majority of the Highlanders in a nearby wood. The garrison, deceived by this tactic, made a sally with about three hundred men, but he quickly withdrew his party from the wood and surrounded them, leading to their immediate surrender. He then sent them as prisoners to Inverness and continued the siege of the Castle. However, the arrival of the Hessians soon forced him to abandon the siege, leaving four hundred men in the Castle.

At this time President Forbes together with Lord Loudon, were endeavouring to confederate and knit together what forces they could: but to prevent their doing much mischief, a party of the brave McDonalds, with some few others, were detached under the Command of the Duke of Perth, who soon dispersed this rising power, and obliged its heads, viz., Lord Loudon and the President to save themselves in boats.

At this time, President Forbes and Lord Loudon were trying to unite and gather whatever forces they could. However, to stop them from causing too much trouble, a group of brave McDonalds and a few others were sent out under the command of the Duke of Perth. They quickly broke up this uprising and forced its leaders, including Lord Loudon and the President, to escape in boats.

Some of my readers may be curious to know who this President was, and what interest he had. He may truly be styled the Oracle of his Country, for many resorted[Pg 207] to him for advice; and had he been as great a friend as he was an implacable enemy, James would in all probability have swayed the English sceptre; for by his interest, cunning and persuasion he brought over his own party, together with Sir Alexander McDonald and several others, who before were just sworn in to the Prince’s interest.[433] So, I say, had he been as firm a friend as he was an implacable enemy, we should have seen, instead of the four thousand men who marched into England, an army of Eighteen or twenty thousand men.

Some of my readers might be curious about who this President was and what his interest was. He could truly be called the Oracle of his Country, as many people turned to him for advice. If he had been as great a friend as he was a relentless enemy, James would probably have held the English throne; through his influence, cleverness, and persuasion, he managed to rally his own party, along with Sir Alexander McDonald and several others, who had just sworn loyalty to the Prince. So, I say, if he had been as loyal a friend as he was a fierce enemy, instead of the four thousand men who marched into England, we would have seen an army of eighteen or twenty thousand men.

About this time we heard, that the officers who were prisoners upon their parole of honour had broken it, and escaped to the enemy’s army, all of them except the Master of Ross and one or two more.[434] But what will the world say, to see these officers, whom no tie of religion, gratitude or honour could bind, protected and cherished by their own party—nay sent against us, to endeavour to destroy those who before had saved them!

About this time, we heard that the officers who were prisoners on their word of honor had broken it and escaped to the enemy's army, all except the Master of Ross and one or two others.[434] But what will the world say to see these officers, whom no bond of religion, gratitude, or honor could hold back, protected and cherished by their own side—actually sent against us to try to destroy those who had previously saved them!

And now we heard, that the Advanced Guard of the enemy was approaching us, and were got up to Strathbogie. We who were also of the advanced Guard, upon receiving this intelligence, quitted Cullen, and retreated to Fochabers, where a considerable body of our men were endeavouring to make a resistance at the River Spey, and had for that purpose built barracks, and made all necessary preparations, in case the passage of the river had been attempted. But finding their army lay quiet at Aberdeen, and that their advanced party in Strathbogie only made now and then some little excursions towards us as far as Keith, we, though at first we were very diligent and alert, we relaxed in our vigilance, nay fell asleep and at last into a lethargy, in which we unhappily continued till awakened by the foul affair of Culloden, which merits an epithet bitterer than I can give.

And now we heard that the enemy's Advanced Guard was approaching us and had reached Strathbogie. We, who were also part of the Advanced Guard, upon hearing this news, left Cullen and retreated to Fochabers, where a significant number of our soldiers were trying to hold their ground at the River Spey. They had built barracks and made all necessary preparations in case there was an attempt to cross the river. However, since their army remained still at Aberdeen and their forward party in Strathbogie only made occasional small excursions toward us as far as Keith, we, despite being very vigilant at first, started to relax our guard. We even fell asleep and eventually sank into a lethargy, which unfortunately continued until we were jolted awake by the tragic events of Culloden, which deserves a description far grimmer than I can provide.

About this time an advanced party under the command of Major Glascow went out at night, and hearing that some[Pg 208] of the enemy were at Keith,[435] surrounded that place, and having taken most of them prisoners, with their arms and equipage, returned the next day with great honour to Spey-side, where Lord John Drummond and Lord Ogilvy commanded.

About this time, a group led by Major Glascow went out at night, and after learning that some of the enemy were at Keith, they surrounded the area. They captured most of them along with their weapons and equipment, and returned the next day with great honor to Spey-side, where Lord John Drummond and Lord Ogilvy were in charge.

As we lay hereabouts a considerable time, assessments were made upon the country for our support, and among others upon the Earl of Findlater’s Estate, who on our arrival had taken wing and joined Cumberland Will. The Earl’s Steward, being threatened with military executions, if he refused to comply with our demands (which were always seconded by such threats, though seldom put in practice) begged leave to write to his Master for instructions how to act. Upon this the Earl, having consulted with Cumberland, sent a Letter addressed To the Man they call Lord John Drummond, telling his Lordship, that if he or any other person should pretend to exercise any military authority over any thing belonging to him, there were Rebels’ houses enough, on which his Master Cumberland promised him he should have his revenge. This Letter excited a great deal of indignation among us; and was the cause of what afterwards happened to his house;—for several of our party, without any order being given, and indeed without the Prince’s being in the then situation of his affairs, able to restrain their fury, ransacked it, and carried away several articles of value, but without setting fire to it, or wantonly destroying anything merely for destroying’s sake.[436]

As we stayed here for quite a while, we assessed the area for our support, including the Earl of Findlater’s estate. When we arrived, the Earl had already fled and joined Cumberland Will. His steward, faced with the threat of military action if he didn’t meet our demands (which were often backed by threats, though rarely acted upon), asked for permission to contact his master for guidance on what to do. After consulting with Cumberland, the Earl sent a letter addressed To the Man they call Lord John Drummond, informing him that if he or anyone else tried to impose military authority over his property, there were plenty of rebel houses where Cumberland promised he could get his revenge. This letter stirred up a lot of anger among us and led to what happened to his house later on; several in our group, without any orders and indeed without the Prince being in a position to control their anger, looted it and took several valuable items, but they did not set it on fire or destroy anything just for the sake of it.[436]

At last news arrived that the enemy had left Aberdeen, and were marching against us.[437] This intelligence gave great satisfaction to many of us, who were in a manner tired out of our lives. Yet notwithstanding the approach of the enemy, all the Prince’s endeavours to collect his whole army, were ineffectual; for many under pretence of cultivating their lands, or promising to come up soon enough, went, staid, and came as they thought proper.

At last, we got news that the enemy had left Aberdeen and was marching toward us.[437] This information pleased many of us, who were basically exhausted with our lives. However, despite the enemy's approach, all of the Prince’s efforts to gather his entire army were unsuccessful; many, claiming they were busy farming or promising to join soon, did as they pleased, staying away or coming back whenever they thought fit.

[Pg 209]

[Pg 209]

And now finding the enemy advanced pretty fast both by water and land, the fleet bringing up their provisions and wearied soldiers; frequent patrols were sent out by us in order to observe their motions. Here I had the honour of commanding the last patrolling party that ever crossed the Spey for the Prince’s cause. Lord John Drummond (Commander at the Spey) having ordered me with ten others to patrol all night towards the enemy, we began our work about seven o’Clock and continued it till about five the next morning, being then eight miles from Fochabers and two from the enemy; when we took a man with a Letter from one of Cumberland’s Secretaries to the Duchess of Gordon,[438] desiring her to employ all her interest among her vassals in getting down provisions and getting together what forces she could, as the Duke of Cumberland intended to pass the river that day. Having secured the Messenger and Letter, we continued our route, till we came up in a manner to where they were encamped; for as they lay upon the declivity of a hill, and had no guards on the top, we were able to approach very near to them unperceived. But finding them drawn out in order of battle, after seeing all we could see, and some bravadoes and huzzas, we retired with all speed, leaving them to wonder what we meant. We soon reached Fochabers (on the Spey) where I found Lord John Drummond. Having given him the Letter taken from the Duke of Cumberland’s Messenger and informed him of the situation I had found the enemy in, I retired to repose myself a little while. When fast asleep, a servant came in to tell me that the enemy was in the town, and that it was too late to think of escaping, almost all of our party having already passed the river. However, starting up in great confusion, I resolved to risk all rather than fall into their hands, and mounting my horse escaped by a back road. I had no sooner crossed the river than I was ordered to join a party of about eighty horse who were to remain behind on the banks of the Spey to observe[Pg 210] the motions of the enemy; whilst the foot, amounting to about two thousand men, marched for Inverness, where the Prince then lay with the greatest part of his army. Finding that the enemy after a short halt at the Spey side, began to cross the river, we likewise retired and followed our foot, to inform them of the enemy’s being in full pursuit of us. This intelligence made our men pass through Elgin, without halting, and straight on that night to Forres, which was ten miles farther; and, after some stay there, to Nairn, out of which we were next morning driven; the whole English Army entering the town at one end, whilst we marched out at the other, and continuing to pursue us sharply for three or four hours. And here it was His Grace the Duke of Perth and Colonel O’Sullivan[439] gained immortal honour by their bravery and conduct in bringing us off in good order from under the very nose of the enemy; for notwithstanding all their firing upon our rear, and though we were much inferior in numbers, we lost not one man.

And now, seeing the enemy advancing quickly by both land and water, the fleet bringing in supplies and tired soldiers, we frequently sent out patrols to keep an eye on their movements. I had the honor of leading the last patrol that ever crossed the Spey for the Prince’s cause. Lord John Drummond, the commander at the Spey, had ordered me and ten others to patrol all night toward the enemy, starting our work around seven o’clock and continuing until about five the next morning, being then eight miles from Fochabers and two from the enemy. We captured a man with a letter from one of Cumberland’s secretaries to the Duchess of Gordon, asking her to use all her influence with her vassals to gather provisions and assemble whatever forces she could manage, as the Duke of Cumberland intended to cross the river that day. After securing the messenger and the letter, we continued our route until we got fairly close to their encampment; since they were camped on the slope of a hill without guards at the top, we were able to sneak in very close to them unnoticed. However, upon discovering they were arranged in battle formation, after seeing all we could and some shouting and cheers, we quickly withdrew, leaving them puzzled about our intentions. We soon reached Fochabers (on the Spey), where I found Lord John Drummond. After giving him the letter taken from the Duke of Cumberland’s messenger and informing him of the enemy's position, I retired to get some rest. While I was fast asleep, a servant came to tell me that the enemy was in town and that it was too late to escape, as most of our party had already crossed the river. However, jumping up in a panic, I decided to risk everything rather than fall into their hands, and mounting my horse, I escaped via a back road. I had no sooner crossed the river when I was ordered to join a group of about eighty horsemen who were to stay behind on the banks of the Spey to observe the enemy’s movements, while the infantry, numbering about two thousand men, marched toward Inverness, where the Prince was at that time with most of his army. Realizing that the enemy, after a brief halt at the Spey side, began crossing the river, we also retreated and followed our foot soldiers to inform them that the enemy was in hot pursuit. This news made our men push through Elgin without stopping and head straight to Forres, which was another ten miles farther; and after a short stay there, we moved on to Nairn, from which we were driven out the next morning; the entire English Army entered the town at one end while we marched out at the other, continuing to chase us aggressively for three or four hours. It was during this time that His Grace the Duke of Perth and Colonel O’Sullivan gained everlasting honor through their bravery and leadership in helping us retreat in good order right under the enemy’s noses; despite all their firing at our rear and being greatly outnumbered, we lost not a single man.

Soon after their desisting from pursuing us, we received orders to halt, and encamp upon that very place, where the fatal battle of Culloden was afterwards fought. Having accordingly encamped as well as we could on the heath that grew upon the common, which served us both for bedding and fuel, the cold being very severe, we were soon after joined by the Prince and several of his Clans. Finding that the enemy did not pursue us we rested ourselves all that night upon the Common, and early next morning drew out in battle-array. But that day being Cumberland’s birthday,[440] and the enemy shewing no intention to attack us on it, we reposed ourselves again, though still keeping ourselves in readiness, upon the place where we had rested the preceding night; a biscuit being given to us for our refreshment. In that situation we remained, till the brave Prince came amongst us in the dusk of the evening, with the full resolution of going to attack them that night in their camp, distant only seven miles. Orders were accordingly given to that[Pg 211] effect, which were obeyed with the greatest pleasure and alacrity by the whole army. We began our March about seven o’Clock leaving great fires burning in our camp: but by some strange infatuation or misfortune the road was not rightly taken, either through the ignorance or treachery of Lord George Murray’s guide. This still remains doubtful, but this I can say, that with the little knowledge I had of the country I could have conducted them much better and sooner. After we had marched till about three o’Clock in the morning, over double the ground that was necessary, we at last came pretty nigh the enemy’s camp: and when we were supposing to surround them, and for that purpose in some measure drawing out; my Lord George Murray began to be missing; notwithstanding the Prince’s Aides-de-Camp in riding from rank to rank, and asking, for God’s sake! what has become of His Lordship, and telling that the Prince was in the utmost perplexity for want of him. In that situation did we remain a considerable time, till, day breaking fast in upon us, we heard that Lord George Murray was gone off with most of the Clans. Where he had been all that considerable time, or what was his intention in it, I leave Time to prove. Now, after we had stood some time on the brink of entering their camp, the Prince, on receiving the unwelcome news of Lord George Murray’s going off with the greatest part of the army, was under the necessity of ordering us likewise, much to our dissatisfaction, to march back again to our Camp. In this manner did that noble and well-concerted scheme fall to ruin—and not only to ruin, but in such a manner as to ruin us, who before had hopes of ruining the enemy. But O! for Madness! what can one think, or what can one say here![441]

Soon after they stopped chasing us, we got orders to stop and set up camp in the very spot where the deadly battle of Culloden took place later. So, we set up camp as best we could on the heath that grew on the common, which served as our bedding and fuel since it was extremely cold. Soon after, the Prince and several of his clans joined us. Since the enemy was no longer pursuing us, we rested all night on the common and early the next morning got ready for battle. However, since it was Cumberland’s birthday, and the enemy showed no signs of attacking, we took another break but stayed ready, resting in the same spot as the previous night, with a biscuit provided for our refreshment. We remained in that position until the brave Prince came to us in the evening, determined to attack the enemy camp, which was only seven miles away. Orders were given accordingly, and the whole army obeyed with great eagerness. We began our march around seven o’clock, leaving big fires burning in our camp. But through some strange misfortune, the road wasn't taken correctly, either due to the ignorance or treachery of Lord George Murray’s guide. This remains uncertain, but I can say that with the little knowledge I had of the area, I could have led them more effectively and quickly. After marching until about three o’clock in the morning, covering twice the distance necessary, we finally approached the enemy camp. Just when we thought we surrounded them and started to position ourselves, Lord George Murray was missing. Despite the Prince’s aides riding from one rank to another, asking in desperation what had happened to him and explaining that the Prince was extremely worried, we remained in that situation for quite some time. As day began to break, we learned that Lord George Murray had left with most of the clans. Where he had been all that time or what his intentions were, I leave time to reveal. After standing at the brink of entering the enemy camp, the Prince, upon receiving the unwelcome news of Lord George Murray taking off with most of the army, had no choice but to order us, much to our dismay, to march back to our camp. This is how that noble and well-planned scheme fell apart—and not just fell apart, but in such a way that it ruined us, who had hoped to defeat the enemy. But oh! What madness! What can one think or say in this situation!

[Pg 212]

[Pg 212]

The enemy at our departure, being fully awakened and seeing the jeopardy they had been in, judged rightly, it was their time now to pursue us in the unhappy situation we were then in, being harassed, hungry and starved and fatigued, almost to the greatest extremity. We had no sooner reached our camp again, than news came of the enemy’s being in full march towards us, and of their intention to attack us. This disagreeable intelligence vexed us much in our present situation, the more so, as of the twelve thousand men, who were actually in arms and in the pay of the Prince, not above Four thousand were now with him many going every moment, notwithstanding his orders to the contrary, to Inverness, and to woods and houses adjacent, in order to repose and rest themselves after their late excessive fatigue. Many of these were so far from rejoining us, that they were taken asleep by the enemy after the battle. Those, however, who staid, put the best face on the affair they could, and all of us presently appeared surprizingly courageous, who only seemed to survive and animated by the spirit of loyalty and love for our dear Prince. But now why we resolved to fight, or why we did not retire to Inverness, and keep that town till we were fully joined, which might have been easily done, or even at last, if judged proper, avoided fighting and make another expedition into England in spite of them,—I may say it was Fortune’s will;—for, contrary to the Prince’s inclination, Lord George Murray insisted on standing and fighting them that day: and as for what he said of our wanting provisions, it is most certain, though we did that day, we might have retired to Inverness and found there a sufficiency of meat for two or three days. However, the Prince, notwithstanding his great inclination to avoid fighting, was at last obliged to give way to the importunity of Lord George Murray, who even used terms very cutting in case of refusal; and was also for fighting His Grace the Duke of Perth—but this may be said for him, he doubted not but the same Hand that had supported and miraculously conducted the Prince hitherto would[Pg 213] infallibly continue to support him, and make him a glorious Conqueror.[442]

The enemy, having fully woken up and realizing the danger they were in, correctly figured it was time for them to chase us, given the unfortunate situation we were in—harassed, hungry, exhausted, and nearly at our breaking point. No sooner had we returned to our camp than we heard news that the enemy was on the march toward us and planned to attack. This bad news upset us greatly, especially since out of the twelve thousand men who were supposed to be with the Prince, only about four thousand were actually with him, while many were heading to Inverness and the nearby woods and houses to rest after their extreme fatigue, despite his orders not to leave. Some of them were so tired that they fell asleep and were caught by the enemy after the battle. However, the ones who stayed tried to keep a brave face, and we all appeared surprisingly courageous, fueled by our loyalty and love for our dear Prince. But now, why we decided to fight, or why we didn’t retreat to Inverness and hold that town until we were fully reinforced, which could have easily been done, or even if deemed necessary, avoid a fight and plan another trip into England regardless of them—I might say it was Fate’s will; for, against the Prince’s wishes, Lord George Murray insisted on confronting the enemy that day. As for his concern about our food supply, although we were short that day, we could have retreated to Inverness and found enough provisions for two or three days. Still, despite his strong desire to avoid conflict, the Prince eventually had to give in to Lord George Murray's insistence, who used very harsh terms if the Prince refused, and he was also in favor of fighting His Grace the Duke of Perth—but it could be said for him that he had no doubt the same divine Hand that had supported and guided the Prince thus far would [Pg 213] continue to support him and make him a glorious victor.[442]

I shall now proceed to give account in what manner we were ranged in battle-array. The brave McDonalds, who till then had led the van, and behaved at all times with great courage and bravery, were now displaced, and made to give way, at the pleasure of Lord George Murray, to the Athol men, whom he commanded. The rest of the front line was composed of Highlanders: the second, of Lowlanders and French, with four pieces of cannon at each wing: and in the rear was the Prince attended by all the horse, and some foot. In this manner were we drawn up—four thousand men to fight eleven thousand. The enemy being by this time in full view, we began to huzza and bravado them in their march upon us, who were extended from right to left in battle-array, it being upon a common. But, notwithstanding all our repeated shouts, we could not induce them to return one: on the contrary, they continued proceeding, like a deep sullen river; while the Prince’s army might be compared to a[Pg 214] streamlet running among stones, whose noise sufficiently shewed its shallowness. The Prince, the Duke of Perth, the Earl of Kilmarnock, Lord Ogilvy, and several other Highland and Lowland Chiefs, rode from rank to rank, animating and encouraging the soldiers by well-adapted harangues.

I will now describe how we were arranged for battle. The brave McDonalds, who had led the front line and shown great courage at all times, were now replaced by the Athol men under Lord George Murray's command. The rest of the front line consisted of Highlanders, while the second line had Lowlanders and French troops, with four cannons on each wing. In the rear was the Prince, accompanied by all the cavalry and some infantry. This is how we were set up—four thousand men ready to fight against eleven thousand. As the enemy came into view, we started to cheer and taunt them as they marched towards us, spread out across the common. However, despite our repeated shouts, we couldn’t get them to respond; they kept moving forward, like a deep, sullen river, while the Prince's army resembled a streamlet running over rocks, its noise revealing its shallowness. The Prince, the Duke of Perth, the Earl of Kilmarnock, Lord Ogilvy, and several other Highland and Lowland leaders rode through the ranks, inspiring and encouraging the soldiers with well-timed speeches.

The battle being now begun, the whole fury of the enemy’s Artillery seemed to be directed against us in the rear; as if they had noticed where the Prince was. By the first cannon shot, his servant, scarcely thirty yards behind him, was killed; which made some about the Prince desire, that he would be pleased to retire a little off: but this he refused to do, till seeing the imminent danger from the number of balls that fell about him, he was by the earnest entreaties of his friends forced to retire a little, attended only by Lord Balmerino’s corps. Frequent looks and turns the Prince made, to see how his men behaved: but alas! our hopes were very slender, from the continual fire of musketry that was kept up upon them from right to left. We had not proceeded far, when I was ordered back, lest the sight of my standard going off, might induce others to follow. In returning, various thoughts passed my soul, and filled by turns my breast with grief for quitting my dear Prince, now hopes of victory, then fear of losing—the miserable situation the poor loyalists would again be reduced to—and what we had to expect if we left the field alive: these thoughts, I say, strangely wrought upon me, till, coming to the place I was on before, and seeing it covered with the dead bodies of many of the Hussars who at the time of our leaving had occupied it, I pressed on, resolving to kill or be killed. Some few accompanied my standard, but soon left it. At this time, many of ours from right to left were giving way and soon the battle appeared to be irretrievably lost. The enemy, after we had almost passed the two ranks, flanking and galling us with their continual fire, forced us at last back, broke our first line, and attacked the second, where the French troops were stationed. I happened then to be there, and after receiving a slight[Pg 215] grazing ball on my left arm, met with Lord John Drummond, who, seeing me, desired I would come off with him, telling me all was over and shewing me his regiment, just by him, surrounded. Being quickly joined by about forty more horse, we left the field of battle in a body, though pursued and fired upon for some time. When we arrived at the foot of the hills, some of us took one way, and some another: I, however, with about six more, continued with Lord John Drummond; and it was with some difficulty we passed the rapid torrents and frozen roads, till one o’Clock that night, when we came to a little village at the foot of a great mountain, which we had just crossed. Here we alighted, and some went to one house and some to another. None of these cottages having the conveniences to take in our horses, who wanted refreshment as well as we, many of them perished at the doors. I happened to be in one of the most miserable huts I had ever met with during my whole life; the people were starving to death with hunger. However, having laid myself down on the floor to rest myself after having been almost thirty hours on horse-back; the people came crying about me and speaking a language I did not understand, which made my case still more unpleasant. But by good luck, a soldier soon after came in, who could speak both to them and me, and brought with him some meal, which was very acceptable, as I was almost starving with hunger. Of this meal we made at that time a very agreeable dish, by mixing it very thick with cold water, for we could get no warm: and so betwixt eating and drinking we refreshed ourselves, till four o’Clock in the morning; when Lord John Drummond and the rest of us began our march, we knew not whither, through places it would be in vain to describe; for we saw neither house, barn, tree, or beast nor any beaten road, being commonly mid-leg deep in snow, till five o’Clock that afternoon; when we found ourselves near a village called Privana a Badanich,[443] the barracks of which, as I mentioned[Pg 216] before, the Prince had destroyed. Being now, to our surprize, almost upon it, we consulted amongst ourselves how we might best get intelligence from it; for, as it lay on the road from Inverness twenty-four miles we apprehended the enemy might be there. But fortunately a soldier coming out told us, that the village was occupied by the Prince’s men. This intelligence gave us great pleasure; and having accordingly entered the place, we found a great many of the Prince’s adherents, the chief of whom was Lord George Murray and the Duke of Perth; but we heard no news where the poor Prince was. At first we had great hopes of rallying again: but they soon vanished, orders coming for every one to make the best of his way he could. So some went one way, some another: those who had French Commissions surrendered; and their example was followed by my Colonel, Lord Balmerino, tho’ he had none. Many went for the mountains, all being uncertain what to do or whither to go.

The battle had now started, and it felt like the enemy's artillery was aimed straight at us from behind, as if they had spotted the Prince. The first cannon shot killed his servant, who was barely thirty yards away, prompting some near the Prince to ask him to move back a bit. He initially refused, but eventually, due to the significant danger from the bullets landing around him, his friends convinced him to back off a bit, accompanied only by Lord Balmerino’s group. The Prince kept glancing back to see how his men were doing, but sadly, our hopes were pretty low because of the constant gunfire coming from both sides. We hadn’t gone far when I was ordered to return, so the sight of my standard leaving wouldn’t encourage others to do the same. As I headed back, a mix of emotions flooded my mind, filling me with sadness for leaving my dear Prince, hopes for victory, fears of loss—the terrible situation the loyalists would face again—and what awaited us if we managed to escape. These thoughts weighed heavily on me until I reached the spot I had been at before. It was covered with the bodies of many Hussars who had occupied it when we left, and I pushed on, determined to either fight or die. A few stayed with my standard but soon drifted away. At that moment, many of our men from both sides were retreating, and the battle was clearly slipping away from us. The enemy, after almost passing us on either flank with their relentless fire, finally pushed us back, broke our first line, and attacked the second where the French troops were. I happened to be there and, after getting grazed by a bullet on my left arm, ran into Lord John Drummond, who asked me to leave with him, saying it was all over and showed me his regiment surrounded nearby. Quickly joined by about forty more soldiers, we left the battlefield as a group, though we were chased and shot at for a while. When we reached the base of the hills, we split up: some went one way, others another. I stayed with about six others and Lord John Drummond, and we struggled to cross the fast-moving streams and icy roads until 1 AM when we reached a small village at the bottom of a big mountain we had just crossed. We dismounted, and some went to one house while others to another. None of the cottages could take in our horses, who were just as hungry as we were, and many of them suffered outside. I found myself in one of the worst huts I had ever seen in my life; the people were starving. I lay down on the floor to rest after being on horseback for almost thirty hours, but the people gathered around me, speaking a language I didn’t understand, which made my situation even worse. Fortunately, a soldier soon came in who could communicate with both me and them and brought some meal, which was a relief because I was starving. We made a pretty decent meal by mixing it thick with cold water since we couldn’t heat anything. We kept eating and drinking until 4 AM when Lord John Drummond and the rest of us began our march, unsure of where we were going, through places that would be pointless to describe since we saw no houses, barns, trees, animals, or any paths, constantly trudging through snow up to our mid-calves. By 5 PM that afternoon, we found ourselves near a village called Privana a Badanich, whose barracks, as I mentioned before, the Prince had destroyed. To our surprise, we were almost there and discussed among ourselves the best way to gather information since it lay on the road from Inverness, twenty-four miles away, and we feared the enemy might be present. Luckily, a soldier came out and told us that the village was occupied by the Prince’s men. This news brought us great relief, and upon entering the village, we found many of the Prince’s supporters, the main ones being Lord George Murray and the Duke of Perth; however, we had no information on where the poor Prince was. At first, we were hopeful of regrouping again, but that hope quickly faded as orders came for everyone to find their way as best as they could. Some went one way, others another; those with French commissions surrendered, and my Colonel, Lord Balmerino, followed suit even without one. Many headed for the mountains, all uncertain about what to do or where to go.

In this perplexity I resolved to steer my course through the mountainous country, notwithstanding the advice of many to the contrary, who told me, it would be impossible for me to escape, and begged I would go and surrender, assuring me, that if I attempted the mountains, I should inevitably perish in them. But reflecting, how nigh suffering my Father had been in the year 1715, taking Courage and Patience for my guides, I resolved to enterprize a journey through a Country that few of my Nation had ever passed before. So, folding up my Standard, whose Motto was Britons! strike home! I put it in my Riding-coat pocket, in hopes it might be of use another day, and began my journey, in company with three others, for the Highlands. Having discharged our horses, after a long day’s journey, we came to a house situated on Garvie-more, twelve miles from any other, where we met with many of our party, who had arrived there before us. However, putting up in the best manner with what little we could obtain, we set forward for Fort Augustus: but on the road, a misfortune happened, that disconcerted[Pg 217] all our plans; for a man who carried our provisions of Oatmeal, fallen a little behind, by accident met with some of the Brigade Picquets, who robbed him of our meal and two riding-coats. This unexpected loss obliged us to separate soon afterwards, being too many to subsist in this wild tract of country, if we had kept together. However, having got betwixt Fort Augustus and Fort William, we struck up into the country to the right, and passed several large mountains in Lochiel’s Country, where we staid three days, because we heard, that the brave Prince was nigh us, and to take leave of one another, the necessaries of life being exceedingly scarce, from the great number of people wandering over the hills as well as we. I here went to wait upon the Duke of Perth, who was at the house of Doctor Cameron, Lochiel’s Brother: but being told by two sentinels at the door, that His Grace was indisposed, I returned without seeing him. It was now reported, that an English spy had been at Doctor Cameron’s house which obliged me in all haste to quit that place; for certain it is, had I staid there any longer, and the Highlanders supposed me to be the spy, they would have made away with me. I therefore left my companions and set forward to Lochaber, the wildest country I ever was in. And now it was that I began to be truly miserable, and to endure hardships which I had thought it impossible for human nature to support, for in that most hideous place I was deprived of every thing that could give me comfort: true it is, I found some few inhabitants; but in language food and customs quite different from what I had ever seen before. In this place I was forced to stay several days, on account of the prodigious quantity of snow that fell upon the mountains, and hindered me from discerning or making any road. During my stay, I by good fortune got a pound of black bread to live upon. The snow somewhat melting I set forward again from Lochaber towards the sea-shore. On the road I was overtaken by about forty women, half-starved to death who were wandering up and down for safety. Some of them, who spoke English, told me,[Pg 218] they had been driven out of their houses by the soldiers who were sent out from Fort William to ravage burn and plunder all before them and now it was that the most heart-rending scenes of misery began to present themselves; for many of these poor creatures with children in their arms, lay extended in the clefts of the rocks half covered with snow, dead, and a-dying in the most piteous manner. With these companions of misery, and daily meeting with more I passed some days. I now learned, that many of the unfortunate adherents of the Prince had been famished to death on the hills and I expected it would soon be my turn, for I began to be almost unable to proceed, my shoes being worn out, and the sharp rocks wounding my feet. However, I encouraged myself with the thought that my pursuers would have the same difficulty to climb the rocks as I had; and on the twentieth day[444] after our defeat at Culloden I came to the sea, in Clan-Ronald’s Country; the view of which was most agreeable to me, though even then I saw no prospect of escaping. Getting a little refreshment from the people who dwelt on the sea-shore, I began as it were to revive again, having been almost starved to death with hunger and cold; for I had been obliged to lie down for whole nights under the shelves of rocks, and was for two or three days together without eating at all, as nothing could be obtained either for love or money. Though I was fat and strong at the battle of Culloden, I was now quite emaciated and reduced to so miserable a state, that, if I had had another day to walk, I am sure I must have died; for I was not only starved with hunger and cold, but frightfully covered with vermin, which bit me all over my body so that there remained not one whole place in my skin. This, joined with the pain in my torn feet, made me often think that Job could not be in a more piteous condition. Yet as he had God for his comforter, so had I; for the justness[Pg 219] of the cause I was suffering for, gave me great courage, and supported me much: and though I saw daily enmities exercised against me, it was a great satisfaction to me, to think, that, during the time I had the honour of being a soldier under the banner of our dear Prince, I could not accuse myself of one act that a Christian might blush at.

In this confusing situation, I decided to make my way through the mountainous region, despite many people advising against it. They warned me that escaping would be impossible and pleaded with me to surrender, insisting that if I tried to cross the mountains, I would surely die. However, remembering how close my father had come to suffering in 1715, I took courage and patience as my guides and resolved to embark on a journey through a land few from my country had ever traversed before. So, folding up my Standard, which had the motto Britons! strike home!, I tucked it into my riding coat pocket, hoping it might be useful another day, and began my journey with three others towards the Highlands. After a long day's travel, we unloaded our horses at a house on Garvie-more, twelve miles from anywhere else, where we met many from our group who had arrived before us. We made the best of what little we could gather and set out for Fort Augustus. However, on the way, a misfortune disrupted all our plans; a man who was carrying our oatmeal provisions fell slightly behind and happened to encounter some Brigade Picquets, who robbed him of our food and two riding coats. This unexpected loss forced us to separate soon after, as there were too many of us to survive together in this wild area. Nevertheless, we made our way between Fort Augustus and Fort William, heading into the country to the right, and crossed several large mountains in Lochiel's country, where we stayed for three days. We heard the brave Prince was nearby, and due to the severe scarcity of resources from so many people wandering the hills, we needed to say our goodbyes. I went to see the Duke of Perth, who was at Dr. Cameron’s house, Lochiel’s brother. However, two sentinels at the door informed me that His Grace was unwell, so I left without meeting him. It was soon reported that an English spy had been at Dr. Cameron's house, so I had to leave in a hurry; if I had remained longer and the Highlanders thought I was the spy, they would have harmed me. Thus, I left my companions and headed towards Lochaber, the wildest place I had ever been. It was then that I began to feel truly miserable and endured hardships I had never imagined a human could withstand, as I found myself without anything to comfort me. I did encounter a few locals, but they spoke a language and had customs entirely different from what I was used to. I was forced to stay several days due to the heavy snow that fell on the mountains, which prevented me from seeing or making any road. By good fortune, I managed to get a pound of black bread to live on. As the snow began to melt, I resumed my journey from Lochaber towards the seaside. Along the way, I was overtaken by around forty women, nearly starved, who were wandering in search of safety. Some of them, who spoke English, told me that soldiers had driven them out of their homes from Fort William, setting fire to and plundering everything in their path. It was then that I began to witness the most heart-wrenching scenes of misery; many of these poor women, with children in their arms, lay stretched out in the crevices of rocks, half-covered in snow, dead or dying in the most pitiful way. I spent several days in the company of these fellow sufferers, encountering more and more of them. I learned that many supporters of the Prince had starved to death in the hills, and I feared it would soon be my turn. I was almost unable to move anymore, my shoes worn out and sharp rocks cutting into my feet. However, I encouraged myself with the thought that my pursuers would face the same challenges climbing the rocks as I did; on the twentieth day after our defeat at Culloden, I reached the sea in Clan-Ronald’s territory. The sight was quite pleasing to me, even though I still saw no hope of escape. I received a bit of refreshment from the people living along the sea, which revitalized me after being nearly starved from hunger and cold; I had been forced to sleep whole nights under rocky outcrops and went for days without eating because nothing could be obtained for love or money. Although I had been fit and strong at the battle of Culloden, I was now utterly emaciated, reduced to such a miserable state that if I had walked another day, I surely would have died; I was not only starving from hunger and cold but also horrifically infested with vermin that bit me all over, leaving no unbroken skin on my body. This, along with the pain from my wounded feet, often made me think that Job could not have been in a more pitiable condition. Yet, just as he had God as his comforter, so did I; for the righteousness of my cause gave me tremendous courage and supported me greatly. Even though I witnessed daily hostilities against me, it was a great comfort to know that during my time serving under our dear Prince’s banner, I could not accuse myself of a single act that a Christian might regret.

Being somewhat recovered by the particular care of a worthy Gentleman (whose kindness I had the satisfaction in a little time to return by an agreeable meeting with him at Paris), I began to inquire, if it were possible from island to island to make my escape out of the country; for could I have sold myself at that time as a slave into Turkey, I would have done it. My host told me, that it was impossible, as all the boats had been destroyed by Cumberland’s order. However, one morning, being in that perplexity of thought how to get off, and fearing every moment the landing of soldiers to destroy the country—news was brought us that two French ships had come into the Lough just by—which mightily raised our hopes, that either a restoration of the Prince’s affairs were at hand, or that we should escape to France. So, running down to see and hear what we could we found them to be ships destined for the Prince’s service, having on board a great quantity of arms and ammunition, with five barrels of gold, pretty large and nearly one-yard long—which before our late fatal disasters might have been of great use.[445]

After receiving some care from a kind gentleman (whose kindness I was glad to repay with a pleasant meeting in Paris soon after), I began to look into whether it was possible to escape from the country by traveling from island to island. If I could have sold myself into slavery in Turkey at that moment, I would have done it. My host informed me that it was impossible since all the boats had been destroyed by Cumberland's orders. However, one morning, while I was anxiously thinking about how to leave and fearing the imminent arrival of soldiers who would devastate the area, we received news that two French ships had arrived at the nearby Lough. This significantly boosted our hopes that either the Prince's situation was about to improve or that we might escape to France. Eager to see and learn more, we rushed down and discovered that the ships were sent for the Prince's service, carrying a large quantity of weapons and ammunition along with five barrels of gold, each about a yard long—something that could have been very useful before our recent disastrous events.[445]

Notice being sent all about the Mountains, as far as time would permit; several, who lay despairing, came down to the sea-shore, and among the rest, my old patron the Duke of Perth, Lord John his brother; Sir Thomas Sheridan, Secretary Murray, Mr. John Hay, and Doctor Cameron. These being assembled together, judged it proper though no one knew where the Prince was (many thinking he was gone off for France) to have the money and arms brought on shore; which was done on the[Pg 220] evening after. Going securely to sleep that night expecting to sail for France the next day, we were surprised by the noise of cannon, which awakened us about three o’Clock in the morning; and getting up to see what the matter was, we had for our comfort the disagreeable news and sight of three English ships, that were come from Fort William to attack the French, whose appearance on the coast they had noticed, it seems. This sight displeased us very much: however, fighting was the resolution of us all. The two French Frigates (viz., the Mars and the Bellona), being pretty strong, and having a sufficient quantity of men, cannon, and ball, resolved to make head against the three English vessels, of which one was the Baltimore,[446] that name being written upon her rudder, which was carried off by a cannon-ball. The place they fought in, was a creek of rocks, which held the French (the English coming down upon them) as it were penn’d up, having the land on their back and both sides. However it was easy for them to hold communications with us on shore, who were four hundred armed men or more; so that had they been obliged to abandon their Ships, they might have saved themselves on shore. The Crews of the two ships amounting to nearly eleven hundred men, might, with the assistance of the Highlanders, have made an effectual resistance to the English, if they had attempted to invade us. The battle furiously beginning at three o’Clock in the morning, it remained doubtful till four in the afternoon, who would be victors. Nor was it a small pleasure to us to see those combatants engaged, and the skill of the French, whose fire seldom missed the English; for many of us being upon the rock as it were hung over these ships, in such a manner that they could not hurt us with either cannon or musketry; we could discern how matters went, and few balls were fired but we might see whether they hit or missed, which latter the English frequently did. During the engagement, the Highlanders were busied in carrying the arms, money,[Pg 221] and powder off from the sea-shore; which service they performed with amazing resolution, many a cannon ball being fired, in order to hinder them, by the largest of the English ships. Few Highlanders there were but what had a cask of brandy hid privately in the hills, with which some of them got merry before night. At last we had the satisfaction to see the English hoist their sails, leave the French, and sail to the main ocean. The French repaired their ships as fast as possible, and endeavoured to make what haste out they could, lest the English should return with a greater force.

A notice was sent out across the mountains as far as time allowed; several people, who were feeling hopeless, made their way down to the shore, including my old supporter, the Duke of Perth, his brother Lord John, Sir Thomas Sheridan, Secretary Murray, Mr. John Hay, and Doctor Cameron. They gathered together and decided that even though no one knew where the Prince was (many believed he had fled to France), it was necessary to bring the money and arms ashore, which was done the evening after. Expecting to set sail for France the next day, we went to sleep that night, only to be startled awake around three in the morning by the sound of cannon fire. When we got up to check what was happening, we were disheartened to see three English ships that had come from Fort William to attack the French, who had apparently been spotted near the coast. This sight greatly displeased us. Nevertheless, we all resolved to fight. The two French frigates—the *Mars* and the *Bellona*—were fairly strong, with enough men, cannons, and ammunition, and they decided to face off against the three English vessels, one of which was the *Baltimore*, as it was written on her rudder, which was knocked off by a cannonball. They fought in a rocky cove that cornered the French, with the English closing in on them from the front, having the land at their backs and on both sides. However, they could easily communicate with us on the shore, where we had over four hundred armed men. If they needed to abandon their ships, they could have escaped to shore. The crews of the two ships totaled nearly eleven hundred men, and with the help of the Highlanders, they could have effectively resisted the English if they had attempted an invasion. The battle started fiercely at three in the morning, and until four in the afternoon, it was uncertain who would emerge victorious. It was quite a thrill for us to watch the combatants in action, and the French were skilled in their aim, rarely missing the English. Many of us were positioned on a rock that overlooked the ships, making it so they couldn't hit us with either cannon or muskets; we could see how things were going, and it was evident that the English frequently missed their shots. During the fight, the Highlanders were busy hauling arms, money, and powder from the shore, performing this task with incredible determination, even as cannonballs rained down from the largest of the English ships trying to stop them. Most Highlanders had a hidden stash of brandy in the hills, and some managed to get a bit tipsy before nightfall. In the end, we were pleased to see the English raise their sails, abandon the French, and head out to the open ocean. The French worked quickly to repair their ships and tried to leave as fast as they could, worried that the English might return with a larger force.

All being over and hopes reviving again; one who had been in the Guards with me, came and told me, he had found a barrel of money, and that he would get me as much of it as I pleased. To this proposal I replied, That I had no manner of use for it, for, if I should be so fortunate as to escape into France, I had friends enough there, who would take care of me; and that if I died or were taken, it would be of no service to me. Moreover if the Prince should rally again, how shocking it would be to have to reproach ourselves with being a hindrance to our dear Prince’s designs. On hearing this reply, he, being of a temper exceedingly rude, began to repent of informing me of it; and seemed resolved to take some, and let the rest be embezzled away; for as far as I could learn he had hidden it in a place unknown to any one but whether in the confusion when everything was carried off, he had stopped it, or carried it away, elsewhere, I know not, for he would not tell me. But strange, you will say, must have been the confusion when a barrel of gold fell into his hands, and no one the wiser. However, I determined to quitt my hands and conscience of it; and much search being made for it at this time, I went and told one Mr. Harrison, a Priest,[447] about it, and what such a man[Pg 222] intended to do, and beg that he would keep an eye on him: but he, being a little before me, overheard me, and turning back knocked me down with a stick, and swore, that he would kill me the first opportunity. But the Priest, taking my part endeavoured to pacify him, desiring him to desist from thoughts of the money, and shew him where it was. The man, however, remained obstinate, and said he was resolved to have some of it, since the Prince’s affairs seemed now desperate; alleging that his Father and himself had been ruined for loyalty. They then both agreed to go together; but what afterward passed, I know not.

After everything was over and hopes were coming back, a guy I used to serve with in the Guards came to me and said he found a barrel of money and could get me as much as I wanted. I told him I had no use for it because if I was lucky enough to escape to France, I had enough friends there to help me. Besides, if I died or was captured, it wouldn't do me any good. Also, if the Prince managed to rally again, it would be terrible to think we were getting in the way of his plans. After hearing my response, he, being quite rude, seemed to regret telling me and looked like he was planning to take some for himself and let the rest be stolen, because as far as I could tell, he hid it somewhere only he knew. Whether he had hidden it during the chaos when everything was taken or had moved it somewhere else, I don't know, because he wouldn’t tell me. But you must think it was strange that a barrel of gold ended up in his hands without anyone knowing. Anyway, I decided to wash my hands of it and clear my conscience. Since there was a lot of searching going on, I went to a Priest named Mr. Harrison, [447], and told him about it and what this guy planned to do, asking him to keep an eye on him. But the guy overheard me and turned around, knocked me down with a stick, and swore he would kill me the first chance he got. The Priest tried to help me out and urged him to forget about the money and show him where it was. However, the man stayed stubborn and said he was determined to get some because the Prince's situation looked hopeless, claiming that he and his father had been ruined for their loyalty. They both agreed to go together, but what happened afterward, I don't know.

Recovering myself from the fall he gave, I went towards the ships, in order to get on board that night, and in going I was so happy as to meet with the Duke of Perth, who, seeing me in a most piteous condition, called me to him, and, after embracing me, and giving me most agreeable consolations, said: ‘Dear Mr. Daniel, I am truly sorry for you; but I assure you that you shall go along with me, and if we are so fortunate as to get to France, depend upon it, that I shall always be your friend.’ In reply I begged His Grace not to be in pain about me; for the loss of me was only the loss of my life, not having one dependant upon me; and assured him that I was truly resigned to God’s holy will; and thanking His Grace for his kindness and concern for me, wished we might be so happy as to reach France. And now, after we had staid some time upon the sea-shore, waiting for the boats, three were sent to fetch us; but we were obliged to wade breast-deep into the sea, before we could get on board of them. While we were lying on the shore—the Duke, poor man! wrapped up in a blanket!—a Highlander by accident let the snuff of his tobacco-pipe fall into a barrel of gun powder; which blowing up, with a great number of stones about it, one of them flew so near my ear, that[Pg 223] I could not hear at all for three hours after. This explosion alarmed us at first, as we supposed the English had returned to attack the French ships again: but happily no other mischief was done, except that the Highlander lost his life.

Recovering from the fall I took, I made my way toward the ships to board that night. On my way, I was delighted to run into the Duke of Perth. Seeing me in a terrible condition, he called me over, embraced me, and offered me some comforting words. He said, “Dear Mr. Daniel, I’m really sorry for what you’re going through; but I promise you that you can come with me, and if we’re fortunate enough to reach France, you can count on me to always be your friend.” I replied, asking His Grace not to worry about me, since my loss only meant losing my own life, with no one depending on me. I assured him that I was truly resigned to God’s will and thanked him for his kindness and concern, hoping that we would be lucky enough to reach France. After we had stayed on the shore for a while waiting for the boats, three were sent to bring us back. We had to wade through the water, getting soaked up to our chests, before we could board them. While we were lying on the beach—poor Duke wrapped in a blanket!—a Highlander accidentally dropped the ash from his tobacco pipe into a barrel of gunpowder. The explosion sent a lot of stones flying, and one of them hit so close to my ear that I couldn’t hear at all for three hours afterward. At first, the blast startled us because we thought the English had come back to attack the French ships again. Thankfully, no other damage was done, except that the Highlander lost his life.

The boat the Duke was in, put off immediately; and another coming took me in, with many more, and carried us to the Bellona, where we remained at anchor till two o’Clock the next morning, when we sailed for France.[448] The chief of those in our ship were Sir Thomas Sheridan;[449] Mr. Sheridan, his nephew;[450] and Mr. Hay.[451] We were twenty-five days in sailing to France, and met with no opposition during our voyage. I was exceedingly seasick, and having no pockets, and every one thinking I should die, I gave a purse of money to Mr. John Hay’s[Pg 224] servant, telling him, if I died, to keep it; and if I survived to carry it for me to France; which he carefully did for me. In the ship I was in, there raged a contagious distemper, which carried off sixty-seven in twenty-five days: and about the tenth day of our voyage, I saw the body of my friend and patron the Duke of Perth, thrown over-board; which afflicting sight, joined with my violent sickness, I expected would have put an end to my life. But what I thought would have killed me, perhaps contributed to save my life in that pestiferous ship; as my continual vomiting may have hindered any thing noxious from taking any effect upon me. But what is very surprising, for twenty-two days I had not one call of nature, which I affirm upon honour. And now after all my adventures dangers and fatigues, I at the end of twenty-five landed in France, where, to my satisfaction, I have lived since, in the expectation daily of seeing what I have ever wished to see.

The boat the Duke was in set off immediately, and another one came to pick me up, along with many others, taking us to the Bellona, where we anchored until two o’clock the next morning, when we sailed for France.[448] The main people on our ship were Sir Thomas Sheridan;[449] Mr. Sheridan, his nephew;[450] and Mr. Hay.[451] It took us twenty-five days to sail to France, and we faced no opposition during our journey. I was extremely seasick, and since I had no pockets, and everyone thought I might die, I gave a purse of money to Mr. John Hay’s[Pg 224] servant, telling him to keep it if I died, and if I survived, to carry it for me to France; and he did so carefully. On the ship I was on, a contagious illness broke out that took sixty-seven lives in twenty-five days: about the tenth day of our journey, I saw the body of my friend and patron, the Duke of Perth, thrown overboard; that distressing sight, combined with my intense sickness, made me think my life would end. However, what I thought would kill me might have actually saved my life in that infected ship, as my constant vomiting may have prevented anything harmful from affecting me. Surprisingly, for twenty-two days, I didn't have any natural urges, which I swear on my honor. After all my adventures, dangers, and exhaustion, I finally landed in France after twenty-five days, where I’m pleased to say I’ve lived since, eagerly anticipating the moment I’ve always wanted to see.

Postscript

PS

Having now finished my Narrative, I hope the truth of what I have written will make up for the faults that may be found in it, and that the candid Reader will find matter of admiration and esteem in the behaviour and actions of one so dear, whom I had once the honour to serve. I shall conclude with

Having now finished my Narrative, I hope the truth of what I have written will make up for any mistakes that might be found in it, and that the open-minded Reader will see reasons to admire and respect the behavior and actions of someone so precious, whom I once had the honor to serve. I will wrap up with

Fuimus Troies, et erimus iterum.

We were Trojans, and we will be again.

Trojans we have been, and will again

Trojans we have been, and will be again

to the satisfaction of all good men!

to the satisfaction of all decent people!

[Pg 225]

[Pg 225]


[Pg 227]

[Pg 227]

NEIL MACEACHAIN’S NARRATIVE OF THE WANDERINGS OF PRINCE CHARLES IN THE HEBRIDES

The misfortunate battle of Colloden being fought upon the 16th of April, 1746, his royal highness seeing that the day was irrecoverably lost, concluded that his only business was to endeavour the saving of himself out of the hands of his enemies: whereupon, having retired to a neighbouring eminence, hard by the place of action, accompanied by a few of Fitz-James’s horse, there, having made a little stop, not knowing whither to direct his course when luckily one Edmond Burk, the servant of one Alexander MacLeod,[452] son of Mr. John MacLeod, of Muiravine Side, rod accidentally by them, thinking to find his master among them, whom he had not seen since the beginning of the battles. His master (who happened to be there present with the prince), knowing him to be very well acquaint with all the different rods of the highlands, ordered him to lead them the safest and surest road to Glengarry. Whereupon the prince,[Pg 228] accompanied by Master O’Sulivan,[453] Mr. Allan MacDowell,[454] priest, and the said Alexander MacLeod, marched westward, and arrived that night about eight o’clock to Thomas Gortlickshorge,[455] a gentleman of the name of Fraser, in Stratharagaig,[456] where he met, as it was said, with my Lord Lovat, and supt with him there that night.

The unfortunate battle of Culloden was fought on April 16, 1746. His royal highness, seeing that the day was hopelessly lost, decided that his only option was to try to save himself from his enemies. After retreating to a nearby hill close to the battlefield, along with a few of Fitz-James’s horse, he paused for a moment, unsure of where to go. Fortunately, a man named Edmond Burk, a servant of Alexander MacLeod, happened to ride by. He was looking for his master, whom he hadn’t seen since the start of the battles. His master, who was there with the prince, knew that Edmond was very familiar with all the different paths of the Highlands, so he asked him to lead them on the safest route to Glengarry. Consequently, the prince, accompanied by Master O’Sullivan, Mr. Allan MacDowell, a priest, and Alexander MacLeod, headed westward and arrived that night around eight o’clock at Thomas Gortlickshorge, a gentleman of the name of Fraser in Stratharagaig, where it was said he met with my Lord Lovat and had dinner with him that night.[Pg 228]

After supper the prince reckoning it dangerous to stay so very near the enemy, the first night, we resolved to continue his journey towards Glengarry; about break of day, finding himself quite fatigued and worn out for want of rest, he consulted with his fellow-travellers, whither he might repair with most safety to take some hours repose. They all concluded that the Castel of Invergary was the surest and safest place for that purpose, and a great conveniency of concealment, and (that he) might repose himself without any fear (there) till such time as he and his party should take further resolutions. Being[Pg 229] then prevailed upon by these reasons, he immediately repaired thither, where he was received by Glengarry with the greatest pleasure.[457] When he sufficiently refreshed himself he took a resolution to proceed still further, fearing to stay long in one place. He departed that same day from Glengarry, being the 17th in the evening, and continued his route towards Lochaber, and came that night to Donald Cameron, of Glenpean’s house, where he passed the remaining part of the night.

After dinner, the prince, considering it risky to stay too close to the enemy on the first night, decided to continue his journey towards Glengarry. By dawn, feeling completely tired and worn out from lack of rest, he talked with his traveling companions about the safest place to rest for a few hours. They all agreed that the Castle of Invergary was the safest option for that purpose, offering good concealment, and that he could rest there without fear until he and his party made further plans. Persuaded by these reasons, he quickly went there, where Glengarry welcomed him with great pleasure. Once he had refreshed himself, he decided to move on, worried about staying too long in one place. He left Glengarry that same evening, the 17th, and continued his journey towards Lochaber, arriving that night at the home of Donald Cameron of Glenpean, where he spent the rest of the night.

Next day being the 18th, he set out for the Braes of Moror, and arrived in the evening at Angus Mack Eachan’s[458] house, son to Alexander McEachan, of Domondrack. He was so much fatigued that night, that he could neither eat nor drink, and required the help of a man to support him to his bed. The next day, being the 19th, he ventured to pass the whole day in a wood near the house, in order to recruit more strength for a night walk; and accordingly when it was late, he set out for Arasack, where he arrived about six in the morning, and went straight to Angus MacDonald’s house in Borrodale, where he quartered, after his landing, till he marched out of the country.[459] At his arrival here, he found a great many Mack Donalds assembled together, who had lately escaped out of the[Pg 230] battle of Colloden—gentlemen of both Glengarry’s and Clanranald’s families. During the eight days he stayed in that country, he had daily conferences with young Clanranald, Colonel MacDonald of Barisdale, and several others of both families, treating which was the safest place, and surest method for his concealment. After they had satisfied him as to that, they protested, and assured him he should have nothing to fear, that they would stand by him if he only would stay among them to the last man. With this he seemed to be very much satisfied, till Mr. O’Neil[460] and O’Sulivan,[461] by the advice of Mr. Allan MacDonald, and one Donald MacLeod, of Galtrigil,[462] perswaded him in a private council, to quite that country for good, and all; and as there was no appearance of succeeding further, and that they lost all hopes of gaining the point they once undertook, it was better to run for the Lewis, where Donald promised to procure a ship for them as far as the Orkneys, and there, he assured them to find a ship to transport them to France.[Pg 231] The prince being prevailed upon by these convincing reasons, ordered a ten-oar boat belonging to Angus MacDonald of Borodale, to be seized upon, and without any further consultation, he put to sea about six o’clock at night, accompanied only by these persons who were the authors of the new scheme, without acquainting any body of any such design,[463] till they were seen fairly under sail of the coast.

The next day, the 18th, he set out for the Braes of Moror and arrived in the evening at Angus Mack Eachan’s house, son of Alexander McEachan of Domondrack. He was so exhausted that night that he could neither eat nor drink, and needed help from a man to get him to bed. The following day, the 19th, he spent the whole day in a nearby wood to regain strength for a night walk. When it got late, he headed for Arasack, arriving around six in the morning, and went straight to Angus MacDonald’s house in Borrodale, where he stayed after landing until he left the country. Upon arriving, he found many Mack Donalds gathered together, who had recently escaped from the battle of Culloden—gentlemen from both Glengarry’s and Clanranald’s families. During his eight-day stay in that area, he had daily meetings with young Clanranald, Colonel MacDonald of Barisdale, and several others from both families, discussing the safest place and the best method for his concealment. Once they assured him of his safety, they promised that they would stand by him till the very end if he chose to stay with them. He seemed quite satisfied with this until Mr. O’Neil and O’Sullivan, based on the advice of Mr. Allan MacDonald and Donald MacLeod of Galtrigil, convinced him in a private meeting to leave that country for good. As it appeared there was no chance of further success and that all hope was lost for their original mission, they suggested it would be better to make for Lewis, where Donald promised to arrange a ship for them as far as the Orkneys, assuring them that they would find a ship there to take them to France. Persuaded by these compelling reasons, the prince ordered a ten-oar boat belonging to Angus MacDonald of Borrodale to be seized, and without any further discussion, he set sail around six o’clock at night, accompanied only by those who had devised the new plan, without informing anyone else of their intentions until they were well out at sea.

This night’s voyage was like to cost them dire; for they were not long at sea when there came on such a terrible roaring of thunder, preceed’d by such dreadfull flashes of lightning, accompanied with a prodigious poure of rain, so that the whole elements seemed to rebel against them, and threatened to send them every moment to eternity; the wind, which continued to blow fair the whole night, coming about to the north, quite contrary to their course, about twelve o’clock at night, made them despair of continuing their intended voyage any further, and so [they] prepared for death, as being sure to be shattered upon the rocks of the nearest shore. Amidst all these dangers he appeared intrepide, and offered his service to Donald MacDonald and Donald MacLeod, seeing they were the only two that was of any service in the boat, whilst all the rest was oblidged to give it up, stiffened and benumbed with cold. They continued in that agony the whole night, ’till about break of day, when Rory MacDonald, who stood at the helm all the time, discerning Benbicula in south-west, where he knew to be one of the best harbours on that coast, and the wind blowing astern of them, he piloted them into the harbour of Roshiness, within five long miles of Clanranald’s house, which being Sunday, and the 29th of Aprile.[464]

This night’s journey was going to cost them dearly; they hadn’t been at sea long when a terrible thunderstorm hit, preceded by dreadful flashes of lightning and a torrential downpour, making it seem like the very elements were rebelling against them and threatening to send them to their doom at any moment. The wind, which had been favorable all night, suddenly shifted to the north around midnight, going completely against their course, leaving them despairing about continuing their planned voyage any further. They prepared for death, certain they would be smashed against the rocks of the nearest shore. Amidst all these dangers, he remained fearless and offered his help to Donald MacDonald and Donald MacLeod, knowing they were the only two who could do anything in the boat, while the rest were forced to give up, frozen and numb with cold. They endured this agony all night until just before dawn when Rory MacDonald, who had been at the helm the whole time, spotted Benbicula to the southwest, where he knew there to be one of the best harbors on that coast. With the wind at their back, he guided them into the harbor of Roshiness, just five long miles from Clanranald’s house, which was a Sunday, the 29th of April.[464]

They were no sooner landed but they were seen by a[Pg 232] herd of Clanranald’s who stayed in the place always to take care of his master’s cattle, and seeing a number of men finely clad, and fully armed, supposing them to be an enemy, he immediately made off, with a nimble pair of heels, and carried the news of what he had seen to his master, as he was at dinner with Mr. John MacAuley,[465] Neil MacDonald,[466] and several other gentlemen. Clanranald, moved by this unexpected surprise, before he resolved upon any thing, sent Donald MacDonald to know the certainty of what the herd had told him. Master MacAulay, who was parish minister in the country, to satisfie his own curiosity sent one of his auditors to learn what they were, from whence they came, and where they were bound for. This fellow, pretending to have been sent thither by Clanranald, upon a report of a boat’s being land’d there, and to examine what they were, learned it was the prince who designed to make for the Lewis in order to make his escape, who came back and told the minister the same. The minister judging that he could not meet with a better opportunity to show his zeal and affection for the government, despatched a courier that same day away to the Herris, with a letter to his father, who was minister there,[467] charging him to write immediately upon receipt of his letter, to Mr. Colin MacKenzie, established minister at Stornoway,[468] informing him of the same, and ordering him to settle all measures with Seaforth’s factor there to apprehend the prince at his first landing.

They had barely landed when a[Pg 232] herdsman from Clanranald, who was always there to tend to his master's cattle, spotted them. Seeing a group of well-dressed, fully armed men, he thought they were an enemy and quickly ran off to report what he had seen to his master, who was having dinner with Mr. John MacAuley, Neil MacDonald, and several other gentlemen. Surprised by this unexpected news, Clanranald, before making any decisions, sent Donald MacDonald to verify what the herdsman had said. Master MacAulay, the parish minister in the area, curious to know more, sent one of his parishioners to find out who they were, where they came from, and where they were headed. This person, pretending to be sent by Clanranald because of a report about a boat landing, discovered that it was the prince planning to escape to Lewis. He returned and told the minister the same. The minister, thinking he couldn't find a better chance to show his loyalty to the government, sent a messenger that same day to the Herris, along with a letter to his father, who was the minister there. He instructed him to write right away upon receiving the letter to Mr. Colin MacKenzie, the established minister in Stornoway, informing him of the situation and telling him to coordinate with Seaforth’s agent there to capture the prince at his first landing.

Donald MacDonald, who was sent by Clanranald to[Pg 233] learn the strength of the enemy, as it was believed, having returned, acquainted him of the matter of fact, assuring, he spoke to Mr. Allen MacDonald, who ordered him to tell Clanranald to come and see him, as he designed to go off that night. Whereupon Clan and Neil MacDonald went privately out of the town, and took their way straight to Roshiness, where they found the prince, in the house with Mr. O’Sulvan, O’Neil, Mr. Allen MacDonald, and Donald MacLeod. The prince received him very kindly, after having communicated to him his design he took leave of him, and put to sea again that night, with the same persons that accompanied him thither. The heavens proved more favourable to them that night than the former, having met with no danger or opposition, and at daybreak they came in to Loch Maddy, in north-west, where they skulk’d the whole day, being the 30th, seeing they durst not venter to sea in the daytime, for fear to be discovered by the several men of war that guarded the coast at that time. They set out from Loch Maddy about six o’clock, which was the ordinary hour they always departed, and landed in Scalpa, in the Herris, early next morning, being the 1st of May.[469]

Donald MacDonald, sent by Clanranald to[Pg 233] assess the enemy's strength, returned to inform him of the situation. He assured that he spoke to Mr. Allen MacDonald, who instructed him to tell Clanranald to come and see him since he planned to leave that night. As a result, Clan and Neil MacDonald quietly left the town and headed straight to Roshiness, where they found the prince with Mr. O'Sulvan, O'Neil, Mr. Allen MacDonald, and Donald MacLeod. The prince greeted him warmly, shared his plans, and then took his leave, setting sail again that night with the same companions. The weather was more favorable for them that night than before, as they encountered no danger or opposition. At daybreak, they arrived at Loch Maddy in the northwest, where they hid for the entire day, the 30th, because they didn’t dare venture out during the day for fear of being spotted by the numerous warships patrolling the coast at that time. They left Loch Maddy around six o’clock, which was their usual departure time, and arrived in Scalpa in the Herris early the next morning, May 1st.[469]

Before they came near a house they took borrow’d names and employments. Master O’Sulvan took that of Captain Sinclair, the prince called himself William Sinclair, the captain’s son, O’Neill changed his name into Neilson, and mate Master Allen named himself Dalrumple, and Rosman, and Donald MacLeod, master of the boat yt brought them thither, and swore the crew to attest the same.

Before they got close to a house, they borrowed names and jobs. Master O’Sulvan went by Captain Sinclair, the prince called himself William Sinclair, the captain’s son, O’Neill changed his name to Neilson, and mate Master Allen named himself Dalrumple. Rosman and Donald MacLeod, the master of the boat that brought them there, made the crew swear to confirm the same.

After this ceremony was over, they came to Donald Campbell’s house, who was the most sponsable gentleman in that part of the country, but an enemy by his name, and a downright hypocrite in his heart;[470] and being asked[Pg 234] by their landlord what they were, they told him they were sea-fareing men from the Orkneys, who being homeward bound from Irland, lost their ship near the Mull of Kintyre, and most of their crew, and were thereupon forced to freight their present boat and crew from Mull, as fare as the Lewis, where they hop’t to find a vessel to transport them safe home to their own country. The next day, being the 2nd of May, they sent Donald MacLeod away to Stornaway before them to have a ship ready freighted, and to get intelligence how the people stood affected, and to send them word accordingly; which project would have had the intended success, were it not for the imprudence of Donald, and MacAulay’s malicious letter.

After the ceremony ended, they went to Donald Campbell’s house, who was the most respected gentleman in that part of the country, but an enemy by name, and a complete hypocrite at heart;[470] when asked[Pg 234] by their landlord who they were, they told him they were seafarers from the Orkneys, who were headed home from Ireland, lost their ship near the Mull of Kintyre, and most of their crew, and were forced to hire their current boat and crew from Mull, hoping to get to Lewis, where they planned to find a vessel to safely take them home to their country. The next day, on May 2nd, they sent Donald MacLeod to Stornoway ahead of them to prepare a ship and to gather information on how the locals were feeling, and to send them news accordingly; this plan would have succeeded as intended if it weren't for Donald’s carelessness and MacAulay’s malicious letter.

As soon as he was arrived at Stornaway he set about putting his commission in execution, and discharged himself so well of that duty, that he got a ship freighted that same evening, and wrote back to the prince, who remained still at Scalpa, to repair thither as soon as possible, but unwarily having gone to drink a bottle with the captain of the ship, reposing too much trust in him, he disclosed to him all the secret, whereupon the captain told him, if he should load the ship with gold he would not employ her for that purpose: Having said this, he went and published in all the streets of the town that the pretender (as he called him) was to come to town privately next night, and if Mr. MacLeod had not escaped out of the town he had certainly been apprehend’d that night. The prince, who knew nothing of what was passing before him, he set out upon the 3 of May for Stornaway afoot, leaving orders with his crew to return home to the mainland and restore the boat to the owner. That day he suffered a vast deal of cold and fatigue, the day being so extreme bad; Donald MacLeod mett him about a quarter of an mile without the town, and told him it was dangerous for him to venter into it by reason they all got notice[Pg 235] of his approach, and were in an uproar all under arms, and that all this was the effect of Mr. MacAulay’s letter.

As soon as he arrived in Stornaway, he got to work on his mission and executed it so well that he managed to get a ship loaded that same evening. He wrote back to the prince, who was still at Scalpa, urging him to come to Stornaway as soon as possible. However, after having a drink with the ship's captain and trusting him too much, he revealed all the secrets. The captain then told him that even if he loaded the ship with gold, he wouldn’t use it for that purpose. After saying this, he announced in all the streets of the town that the pretender (as he called him) would be coming into town secretly the next night. If Mr. MacLeod hadn’t escaped from the town, he would have certainly been captured that night. The prince, unaware of what was happening around him, set out on May 3rd to Stornaway on foot, leaving orders for his crew to return home to the mainland and give the boat back to its owner. That day, he faced a lot of cold and exhaustion since the weather was extremely bad. Donald MacLeod met him about a quarter of a mile outside the town and warned him that it was dangerous to go in because everyone had been alerted about his approach, and they were in an uproar, all armed. This was all due to Mr. MacAulay’s letter.

The prince, raging with anger and fear, retired that night to my Lady Kildin’s house,[471] which lay about half a mile off without the town, and there he passed the remaining part of the night, notwithstanding that a great manny of the mob made a dreadful noise about the house a great part of the night. Having held a consultation with the lady what was properest to be done, she told him that his only safety consisted in returning to Benbicula again, under Clanranald’s protection, since his project in coming thither misgave. In order thereunto, she procured them a boat to cross Loch Stornaway, which was a nearer cut to return to Scalpa; where he left his boat and crew, having taken leave of the worthy lady, he set out about four o’clock in the morning, crossed the Loch, and arrived back at Donald Campbell’s house, that night, which was the 4th of May.[472] He was no sooner arrived but he found all the crew was gone except two, upon account the country people threatened to apprehend them.

The prince, consumed by anger and fear, headed to Lady Kildin’s house, which was about half a mile outside of town, and spent the rest of the night there, even though a large part of the mob was making a terrible noise around the house for most of the night. After discussing what the best course of action was with the lady, she advised him that his only chance for safety was to return to Benbicula under Clanranald’s protection, since his plans for coming there had gone wrong. To facilitate this, she arranged for a boat to cross Loch Stornaway, which was a quicker way to get back to Scalpa. After leaving his boat and crew, and saying goodbye to the kind lady, he set out around four o’clock in the morning, crossed the loch, and arrived back at Donald Campbell’s house that evening, May 4th. As soon as he arrived, he discovered that all but two of the crew had gone, as the local people had threatened to capture them.

The prince fearing to make a stay in any man’s house, who found out what he really was, and reckoning it impracticable to find as many men as would manage his own boat so soon as he would require [them], especially in the heart of an enemy’s country, he bought a small boat from Donald Campbell, whom it was said he bribed by giving him a sum of mony for to hold his tongue, and disown that he knew what he was. It seemed very difficult for them now to get safe into Benbicula, by reason the chanel was pestered with the English navy, sent there a purpose to hinder the prince or any of his party to make their escape. He set out upon the 5th from Scalpa, and[Pg 236] rowed along the coast the whole night; as they passed the mouth of the Finnasvay bay, they observed a ship in the harbour which they belived to be the Baltimore sloop of war, Thomas How Captain, a brother to my Lord How in Irland, and being seen from aboard the Baltimore she immediately sent off one of her long boats in pursuit of them, and chased them the whole night; about 5 aclock in the morning she came up pretty close to them, the prince terrefied at the approach of the enemy begg’d of the rowers to pull away strongly for fear to fall a sacrifice in the hands of these ravenous wolves, whereupon they ran in upon a ridge of rocks they observed betwixt them and the land, and there sculked close by one of the rocks to observe what course the Baltimore was to take next, while all of a sudden they saw her change her course, not able to find them out. Despairing of success she returned to her harbour.

The prince, worried about staying in anyone’s house who might realize his true identity, and knowing it would be impractical to find enough men to manage his boat quickly—especially in enemy territory—bought a small boat from Donald Campbell. It's said that he bribed him with some money to keep quiet and pretend he didn’t know who he was. It was very difficult for them to safely reach Benbicula because the channel was crowded with the English navy, which was sent there specifically to prevent the prince or anyone with him from escaping. He left Scalpa on the 5th and rowed along the coast all night. As they passed the mouth of Finnasvay bay, they spotted a ship in the harbor that they believed to be the *Baltimore* sloop of war, captained by Thomas How, a brother to my Lord How in Ireland. When the *Baltimore* saw them, it immediately sent one of its longboats after them and chased them all night. At around 5 o'clock in the morning, the sloop got pretty close. The prince, terrified by the approaching enemy, begged the rowers to paddle hard to avoid being captured by these ravenous wolves. They then ran onto a ridge of rocks they saw between them and the land and hid beside one of the rocks to watch what course the *Baltimore* would take next. Suddenly, they saw it change direction, unable to locate them. In despair, it returned to the harbor.

The prince and his party, taking fresh courage, being free from danger that day, they determined as it was near day to draw nearer the land, and sculk there, ’till it was late, that the men might refresh themselves, for the fatigue of the ensueing night; they approached to the shore, and found it to be a desert island, about two leagues from the continent of the Herris, where they found no living creature. They were turned of provisions so short that a lippie of gradan oatmeal[473] was all that remained to them to satiate their hungry appetites, which some of the men took, put some water about it with a little salt, and fell a eating of it. The prince seeing them eat it as hearty as if it had been better cheer, ask’d them whither it tasted better than it look’t, they answered if he would only try it, he would be as well pleased with it as what they were, whereupon, calling for a little of it, he eat it as contentedly as the most delicate dish that ever was served upon his table, saying at the same time that it tasted pretty well, considering the ugly appearance it made. It was not long after, when Providence cast more plenty in their way, for one of the crew, who[Pg 237] was more curious than the rest, having gone to take a view of the island, found in the farther end of it abundance of cod and ling, half a barrel of salt and a pot. Although they were starving the whole day for hunger, yet they durst not make a fire, by reason they thought it dangerous to raise a smock upon the island, lest being seen from the continent it might discover them. When it grew dark the prince ordered the crew to carry some of the fish to the boat, when not a man, either simple or gentle obeyed him,[474] he himself went in a passion, and carried half a dozen of them in his arms, and threw them in the boat, saying since they were all so gentle and scroupelous, that he would take the sin upon himself, and show them the exemple; the whole crew dash’d and confused, would have load’d the boat if he permitted them. Now being about six o’clock, they put to sea, and landed in Benbicula the next day, a little after sunrise, in the very same harbour which they left some days before the 6th of May.

The prince and his group, feeling braver since they were safe that day, decided to move closer to land as it was getting light. They planned to hide there until it got late so the men could rest and recover from the fatigue of the upcoming night. They approached the shore and discovered it was a deserted island, about two leagues from the continent of Herris, where they didn’t find any living creature. Their supplies were so low that a tiny bit of oatmeal was all that was left to satisfy their hunger. Some of the men mixed what little they had with some water and a pinch of salt and started eating it. When the prince saw them enjoying it as if it were a feast, he asked if it tasted better than it looked. They replied that if he tried it, he would enjoy it just as much as they did. So he asked for a little and ate it as happily as if it were the most exquisite dish he had ever had, saying it tasted decent, considering how unappetizing it appeared. Soon after, luck turned in their favor when one of the crew members, who was more curious than the others, went to explore the island and found plenty of cod and ling, along with half a barrel of salt and a pot. Even though they had been starving all day, they were afraid to make a fire because they thought it would be risky to attract attention from the continent. When night fell, the prince ordered the crew to bring some of the fish to the boat, but no one, whether simple or noble, obeyed him. Frustrated, he himself picked up half a dozen fish and threw them into the boat, saying that since they were all so cautious, he would take the blame and set an example for them. The whole crew, embarrassed and confused, would have filled the boat if he had allowed them. Around six o’clock, they headed out to sea and landed on Benbicula the next day, shortly after sunrise, in the same harbor they had left just a few days before on May 6th.

He set his foot no sooner ashore[475] but he sent an express for Clanranald, who came next night, having taken none with him but Neil MacDonald, who was there with him before. Upon Clanranald’s arrival, he seemed quite easie and told him that Providence had sent him under his protection, where he hoped to be sheltered, and that he was to throw himself in his hands to dispose of him as he thought fit. Clanranald assured him he had nothing to fear, and that he would find a place for his concealment, where none should have the least opportunity to see him, but such as he should employ to carry to him whatever he wanted.

He barely got his foot on the shore[475] when he sent for Clanranald, who arrived the next night with only Neil MacDonald, who had been with him before. When Clanranald showed up, he seemed pretty relaxed and told him that fate had brought him under his protection, where he hoped to find safety, and that he was ready to trust him to handle his situation as he saw fit. Clanranald assured him that he had nothing to worry about and that he would find a place for him to hide where no one would have the slightest chance of seeing him, except for those he would send to bring him anything he needed.

After he had sufficiently refreshed himself for some days, it was thought dangerous to make any longer stay at Roshiness, because being a place much frequented by boats from the neighbouring countrys, they would be soon[Pg 238] discovered; for this reason, he was conducted from thence to Bareness, about three miles from Roshiness, where he had the conveniency of a little hutt of a house that was in the place, the entry of which was so very narrow, that he was forced to fall upon his knees, and creep in upon his belly, as often as he entered. This habitation not pleasing him, he begged of Clanranald to send him into some Christian place wherein he could have more room, and use more freedom and ease, for in that monstrous hole he could never have satisfaction, which he said the devil had left because he had not room enough in it.

After he had rested for several days, it was deemed risky to stay any longer at Roshiness since it was a popular spot for boats from neighboring countries, and they would soon be discovered. For this reason, he was taken from there to Bareness, about three miles from Roshiness, where he found a small hut. The entrance was so narrow that he had to drop to his knees and crawl in on his stomach each time he entered. Not liking this place, he asked Clanranald to move him to a more comfortable location where he could have more space and freedom because he couldn't find any satisfaction in that cramped space, which he joked the devil had abandoned due to lack of room.

The next day being the 10th of May, it was determined to send him to Corrodall, a little pleasant glen in South-West,[476] belonging to Neil MacDonald, where there was two country-houses, and conveniency enough for his concealment. Neil was appointed for to conduct him thither, whom he desired to remain still with him. About eleven aclock at night, they set out with Neil, who was their faithful guide, towards Corrodale, where they arrived next day about six in the afternoon; when they came near the house, Neil left him under a rock while he went in to see if there were no strangers there; and finding none but Ranald, his brother,[477] who had come thither the day before by Neil’s own orders, he presently returned where he left the prince, and conducted him to the house.[478] He seemed extraordinary well pleased with[Pg 239] the house, which he swore look’t like a palace in comparison of the abominable hole they had lately left. He sat upon a seat of green turf that was made up for him that same evening, and after taking a refreshment of gradan bread-and-cheese, and goats milk, upon which he fed very hearty, he desired his feet to be washed, being extreme dirty, and very much galled by his night walk; after which he smok’t a pipe of tobacco and went to bed, which being heather and green rushes, he slept soundly ’till twelve next day.

The next day, May 10th, it was decided to send him to Corrodall, a small pleasant valley in the South-West, belonging to Neil MacDonald. There were two country houses there, providing enough privacy for him to hide out. Neil was chosen to take him there, and he asked to stay with him. Around eleven o'clock that night, they set out with Neil, their loyal guide, toward Corrodale, arriving the next day around six in the afternoon. As they approached the house, Neil left him under a rock while he went inside to check for any strangers. He found only Ranald, his brother, who had arrived the day before on Neil's orders. Neil quickly returned to where he left the prince and led him to the house. He seemed extremely pleased with the place, which he swore looked like a palace compared to the horrible place they had just left. He sat on a green turf seat that had been prepared for him that evening, and after enjoying a meal of bread and cheese, along with goat's milk, he had a hearty appetite. He then requested to have his feet washed since they were very dirty and sore from walking all night. After that, he smoked a pipe of tobacco and went to bed, which was made of heather and green rushes, and he slept soundly until twelve the next day.

During this stay at Corrodale, which was five weeks,[479] his ordinary conversation was talking of the army, and of the battle of Colloden, and the highland chieftains whose lamentable case he deplored very much. One day as he was taking a walk in the morning with Neil MacDonald only, the subject of their discourse was describing to Neil the battle of Colloden, wherein he said his horse was shot under him; for (says he) as I was riding up to the right wing, my horse began to kick, at which I was much surprised, being very quiet, and peaceable formerly, and looking narrowly to him to see what was the matter with him, I observed the blood gushing out of his side. Oh! oh! says I (speaking of the horse), if this be the story with you, you have no less than reason to be uneasie, whereupon I was oblidged to dismount and take another. Then the conversation rowlled upon the order of the battle, and how he was forced to condescend to give the right hand to the Atholl-men and others, which he knew to be the MacDonald’s right, meerly by the perswation of my Lord George Murray, and several others, but however he did a great deal of justice and honour to the Mack Donalds, by assuring Neil they were the last that abandoned the field; and, moreover, that they would have had certainly been cut all to pieces, had not the pickets come to their relief, to whom he said, they owe an eternal obligation.

During his five-week stay at Corrodale, his usual conversation revolved around the army, the battle of Culloden, and the Highland chieftains, whose unfortunate situation he lamented. One day, while taking a morning walk with only Neil MacDonald, he described the battle of Culloden, where he said his horse was shot under him. “As I was riding up to the right wing,” he explained, “my horse started to kick, which surprised me since he had always been calm and gentle. When I looked closely to see what was wrong, I noticed blood gushing from his side. Oh, no!” I exclaimed about the horse, “If that’s the case, you have every reason to be worried.” So, I had to dismount and take another horse. The conversation then turned to the order of the battle and how he had to agree to give the right side to the Atholl men and others, which he knew belonged to the MacDonalds, simply because of Lord George Murray's persuasion and others. Nevertheless, he gave a lot of credit and respect to the MacDonalds by assuring Neil that they were the last ones to leave the battlefield. Moreover, he said they would have surely been completely defeated if the pickets hadn't come to their aid, for which he believed they owed an eternal debt of gratitude.

[Pg 240]

[Pg 240]

He blamed always my Lord George as being the only instrument in loseing the battle, and altho’ that he, the morning before the action, used all his rhetorick, and eloquence against fighting, yet my Lord George outreasoned him, ’till at last he yielded for fear to raise a dissension among the army, all which he attributed to his infidelity, roguery, and treachery.[480] He always flattered himself that the highlanders were still upon foot to hinder the enemy from harrassing their countrys, and conceived great hopes that they would be able to stand it out, ’till they got a relief from France. He was so fond to know what was passing among them, that he sent his boat twice to Mudort[481] for intelligence, and hearing of a skirmish betwixt Cluny MacPherson and a party of the elector’s troops in Badanack, of which Cluny had the better, it gave him no small joy: he had notice given him likewise that Borrisdale, upon whose courage and conduct he lay a great stress, was at the head of about three thousand men in Glenkuaak.[482] All these, and manny such like stories kept him still in top spirits, together with the expectation of a French landing in England, where he perswaded himself the Duke of York was landed at the head of ten thousand French, and assured those who durst not contradict him of the same.

He always blamed my Lord George as the main reason for losing the battle, and even though he used all his persuasion and eloquence against fighting the morning before the action, my Lord George out-argued him until he finally gave in, fearing to cause a split among the army. He attributed this to his disloyalty, deceit, and treachery.[480] He constantly reassured himself that the highlanders were still active in preventing the enemy from ravaging their lands, and he had high hopes that they could hold out until they received help from France. He was so eager to know what was happening among them that he sent his boat twice to Mudort[481] for updates, and when he heard about a skirmish between Cluny MacPherson and a group of the elector’s troops in Badanack, which Cluny won, it brought him great joy. He was also informed that Borrisdale, on whom he placed significant importance for his bravery and leadership, was leading about three thousand men in Glenkuaak.[482] All these stories and many like them kept his spirits high, along with his anticipation of a French landing in England, where he convinced himself that the Duke of York had landed with ten thousand French troops and assured those who dared not disagree with him of the same.

It gave him a great deal of pleasure to look to the ships that passed in the Chanel every day, which he flattered himself to be French, though they were really some of the English fleet sent thither to guard the coast, and hinder any of the Highlanders to escape, and would have Neil to go and pilot to some harbour that they might not be lost. It was wonderfull how he preserved his health all the time, notwithstanding all the fatigue and troubles he underwent and the bad usage he met with very often; for I have not seen him one hour sick all the time I have[Pg 241] had the honour to accompany him, save only eight days he was troubled with a flux, which kept him very busie while it lasted; he had always a good appetite, and could eat any meat that came in his way, as well as those who was accustomed to it from their infancy. He took care to warm his stomach every morning with a hearty bumper of brandy, of which he always drank a vast deal; for he was seen to drink a whole bottle of a day without being in the least concerned.

He really enjoyed watching the ships that passed by in the Channel every day, which he convinced himself were French, even though they were actually part of the English fleet sent there to guard the coast and stop any Highlanders from escaping. They would have Neil go and guide them to a harbor so they wouldn’t get lost. It was amazing how he stayed healthy all the time, despite all the fatigue and troubles he faced and the bad treatment he often received; I’ve never seen him sick for even an hour during the entire time I've had the honor to accompany him, except for eight days when he was dealing with a stomach issue that kept him busy while it lasted. He always had a good appetite and could eat any food that came his way, just like those who had grown up with it. He made sure to warm up his stomach every morning with a strong drink of brandy, which he always consumed a lot; he was seen to drink an entire bottle in a day without any concern at all.

He took a vast delight, when it was a good day, to sit up a stone that was before the door of the house, with his face turned towards the sun; and when he was desired to move from thence fearing to get a headache, he ordered them to pack about their business, that he knew himself what was good for him, better than they could describe, that the sun did him all the good in the world. Notwithstanding his melancholy fits, yet at other times he was so hearty and merry, that he danced for a whole hour together, having no other musick but some highland reel which he whistled away as he tripped along. It happened one day as he was walking along the coast with Neil and the rest of the gentlemen, being an excessive hot day, they spied a number of young whales approaching pretty near the shore, and observing them to make straight for the rock whereon they sat down, he sent immediately for his fusee, and as they came within his reach he fired at them; and being informed some time before that Neil was an incomparable good swimmer, he ordered him to strip and hall ashore the whale, which he swore he had shot dead. Neil, in obedience to his orders and to humour him, began to strip very slowly till he saw the whale which had received no hurt out of sight.

He really enjoyed, when it was a nice day, sitting on a stone in front of the house, facing the sun. When people asked him to move because they were worried it would give him a headache, he told them to mind their own business, saying he knew what was best for him better than they could explain, and that the sun was good for him. Despite having his moments of sadness, there were times when he was so cheerful and lively that he danced for a full hour, with nothing but a Highland reel that he whistled while he danced. One day, as he was walking along the coast with Neil and the other gentlemen on an extremely hot day, they spotted a group of young whales swimming close to the shore. Noticing they were heading straight for the rock where they were sitting, he immediately sent for his gun, and as they got within his range, he fired at them. Having been told earlier that Neil was an excellent swimmer, he ordered him to take off his clothes and swim ashore to get the whale, which he claimed he had shot dead. Neil, wanting to follow his orders and go along with him, started to undress very slowly until he saw the whale, which he soon realized was unharmed, swim out of sight.

During his stay at Corrodale, Clanranald paid him several visits, as also all the gentlemen of the country, who sent him presents of all they possessed. As he now despared of any assistance from abroad, and wishing to be out of the Highlands, he thought of setting about getting a ship to transport himself out of the kingdom. In order thereunto, he sent off Mr. O’Neil and Captain[Pg 242] Donald MacDonald, Clanranald’s son, who joined him at his return from the Lewis, in order to go to France, thinking to get passage from the Lewis privately, to either Sweden or Denmark, from whence they were to pass into France.

During his time at Corrodale, Clanranald visited him several times, as did all the local gentlemen, who brought him gifts of everything they had. Since he had given up hope of any help from abroad and wanted to leave the Highlands, he decided to arrange for a ship to take him out of the kingdom. To do this, he sent Mr. O’Neil and Captain Donald MacDonald, Clanranald’s son, who had rejoined him after returning from the Lewis, to go to France, planning to get a private passage from the Lewis to either Sweden or Denmark, from where they would then travel to France.

Having received fifty guineas each to defray their charges, they set out for the Herris, where they were no sooner arrived but O’Neil, who was there with the prince before, was immediately known, and if he had not made his escape back to Benbicula, he had been apprehended without going any further, whereupon he returned to the prince, who did not care much for him ever after. Captain MacDonald, who pursued his journey towards the Lewis, met with the same fate at Stornaway, there, having found his uncle, Alexander MacLeod,[483] he carried him with him to his own house, where he lay concealed for a long time after, and returned to the prince no more.

Having received fifty guineas each to cover their expenses, they set out for the Herris. As soon as they arrived, O’Neil, who had been there with the prince before, was instantly recognized. If he hadn’t managed to escape back to Benbicula, he would have been caught right then and there, which led him to return to the prince, who didn’t have much regard for him afterward. Captain MacDonald, who continued his journey to Lewis, faced the same fate in Stornaway. There, he found his uncle, Alexander MacLeod, and took him back to his house, where he stayed hidden for a long time and never returned to the prince.

The enemy, who was not idle all this time to inform themselves about him, got sufficient intelligence that he was in Wist, disposed of themselves so that it seemed impracticable for him to escape. That he might lose no time, he sent Neil as minister plenipotentiary to Boystile,[484] to treat with him to procure a boat for him, and sufficient hands for to manage it, in case of accidence—for now he was to attempt to gain the mainland, seeing there was no safety for him in Wist. Boystile, who did not go near him all the time for fear of suspicion, sent him back word with Neil, that he himself would come in person and consult with him what was properest to be done. Boystile came next day, and was received by the prince[Pg 243] with open arms, and found some of the gentlemen of the country who came to see him the day before, of whose number was Hugh Macdonald, of Ballissher, from North Wist,[485] who was ready to sacrifice his life and fortune for the prince’s safety (I say), Boystile at his arrival found all these lying in their bed, very much disordered by the foregoing night’s carouse, while his royal highness was the only one who was able to take care of the rest, in heaping them with plaids, and at the same time merrily sung the De Profundis for the rest of their souls.[486]

The enemy, who had been busy gathering information about him, learned that he was in Wist and positioned themselves in a way that made it nearly impossible for him to escape. To waste no time, he sent Neil as an envoy to Boystile,[484] to negotiate for a boat and enough crew to manage it in case something went wrong—because he was planning to try to reach the mainland, seeing no safety for him in Wist. Boystile, who didn’t approach him for fear of being suspected, replied through Neil that he would come in person to discuss the best course of action. Boystile arrived the next day and was welcomed by the prince[Pg 243] with open arms, along with some gentlemen from the area who had visited the day before, including Hugh Macdonald of Ballissher from North Wist,[485] who was ready to risk his life and fortune for the prince's safety. Upon his arrival, Boystile found all of these gentlemen still in bed, quite disheveled from the previous night’s celebrations, while his royal highness was the only one capable of attending to them, covering them with blankets and cheerfully singing the De Profundis for the peace of their souls.[486]

Neil, who was straggling every day about the neighbouring towns for intelligence, and who never missed to come in seasonable time with what news he gathered among the people, arrived, as the Prince, Boystile, and the other gentlemen were very busie and very hearty taking their bottle. It was always the prince’s custom whenever Neil returned from any expedition, to learn from him privately what news he brought before it was made public. Neil told him that two hundred of the[Pg 244] Sky militia, head’d by Hugh Macdonald, of Armidale,[487] and Alexander MacLeod of Ullish,[488] was landed at Barra, who was sent thither by my Lord Lowdian. Campbell, and MacLeod, having had an information that the prince was sculking in that country, and that these gentlemen’s orders were, after a diligent search made in Barra, to pass into South Wist, and to stay there guarding the coasts and foords in the country ’till they were reinforced by a greater number, and, moreover, that Captain Ferguson[489] was ordered to the Lewis for the same purpose, Captain MacKenzie to the Herris, and the Baltimore to cruize upon the coast of Wist, so that it seemed next to a miracle to have been able to escape. The prince, who always[Pg 245] appeared very gay and cheerful, notwithstanding his crosses and misfortunes, was very much dejected at this news; which Boystile observing, begged of him to be in no ways uneasie, that the danger was not so great as what he apprehended, and that he, despite of all the search of the enemy, would procure a place for him where he would not be exposed to the least danger till such time as a more favourable opportunity offered for making his escape; and fearing least the enemy might surprise them, being now three days in the country, Boystile took leave of him in order to prevent their coming so suddenly till he got time to fit into some other place.

Neil, who was wandering daily through the neighboring towns for information and never failed to return at a good time with whatever news he gathered, arrived just as the Prince, Boystile, and the other gentlemen were busy enjoying their drinks. It was always the prince’s habit to learn from Neil privately what news he brought before it was made public. Neil told him that two hundred Sky militia, led by Hugh Macdonald of Armidale and Alexander MacLeod of Ullish, had landed at Barra, sent there by my Lord Lowdian. Campbell and MacLeod had received word that the prince was hiding in that area, and their orders were to conduct a thorough search in Barra, then move into South Wist, where they would guard the coasts and fords until they were reinforced by a larger force. Additionally, Captain Ferguson was ordered to Lewis for the same purpose, Captain MacKenzie to the Herris, and the Baltimore was to cruise along the coast of Wist, making it seem almost miraculous that they had been able to escape. The prince, who usually appeared very cheerful despite his struggles and misfortunes, was greatly troubled by this news. Noticing his distress, Boystile urged him to remain calm, assuring him that the danger was not as severe as he feared, and that, despite the enemy's searches, he would find him a safe place where he would not be in any danger until a better chance for escape arose. Concerned that the enemy might catch them off guard after being three days in the area, Boystile took his leave to ensure they wouldn't be surprised before he had time to move to another location.

Neil fearing the fickleness and the inconstancy of the common people, who might perhaps be perverted from their fidelity to discover him to his enemies, in hopes of a great reward, did not think proper to stay there any longer; whereupon, having got into their boat, which they always had nigh them, they set out about eleven o’clock at night, without acquainting any body of their design, except those who were partakers of it, and took the retreat towards Benbicula, and landed about break of day in Fuyia,[490] a desert island, about three miles from Roshiness, where they sculked for eight days.

Neil, worrying about the unpredictability and disloyalty of the common people, who might betray him to his enemies for a big reward, decided it wasn’t wise to stay there any longer. So, after getting into their boat, which was always nearby, they set off around eleven o’clock at night without telling anyone about their plan, except for those involved. They headed toward Benbicula and landed at dawn on Fuyia, a deserted island about three miles from Roshiness, where they hid for eight days.

During their stay in this solitude, he kept a private correspondence with Boystile about leaving the country, as it appeared impossible for him to conceal himself any longer from those cursed villains who left not a stone unturned to find him out. Boystyle, who used all endeavours to effect his design to get him safely conveyed to the mainland, lost no time to provide whatever necessaries their voyage required; when unluckily he himself was taken prisoner and carried away on board the Baltimore, so that that design perished, and came to nothing.

During their time in this isolation, he maintained a private correspondence with Boystile about leaving the country, as it seemed impossible for him to hide any longer from those terrible villains who were determined to find him. Boystile, who did everything he could to safely get him to the mainland, quickly gathered the supplies they would need for their journey; unfortunately, he was captured and taken aboard the Baltimore, so that plan fell apart and went nowhere.

Upon the news of Boystile’s being made prisoner[491] he[Pg 246] expressed a great deal of regret for him, saying it was a great pity he should fall into the hands of such ruffians, who would have no regard for his merit, for really he was the honestest man (said he) I met with since my stay in the isles. While he stayed upon the island he went about the shore once or twice a day, to see if he could find out which was the most commodious hole or cave for hiding him in case some of the men of war that kept the channel still came to land any men. There he had occasion to see the Lady Clanranald, who came from Roshiness to have the honour of seeing him before he left the country, and carried along with her to him some of what necessaries he wanted: he received her very kindly, made much of her, and thanked her for her generosity, telling her next day at parting that he would not forget soon what kindness he met with in the country. They had plenty of bread and other meats during their retreat in that Patmos, but before the eight days was expired they were obliged to leave the hole to another party of the MacLeods who landed upon the island from Skay.

Upon hearing that Boystile was taken prisoner[491] he[Pg 246] expressed a lot of regret for him, saying it was really unfortunate that he fell into the hands of such thugs, who wouldn't appreciate his worth. He was truly the most honest man (he said) I had met during my time in the islands. While he was on the island, he took walks along the shore a couple of times a day to see if he could find the best spot or cave to hide in, just in case some of the warships patrolling the channel decided to land. During this time, he had the chance to see Lady Clanranald, who came from Roshiness to honor him with a visit before he left the country, bringing with her some of the things he needed. He received her very warmly, treated her well, and thanked her for her kindness, telling her the next day as they parted that he wouldn’t forget the generosity he experienced in the country any time soon. They had plenty of bread and other food during their time in that Patmos, but before the eight days were up, they had to leave the hiding place for another group of MacLeods who landed on the island from Skye.

After being chased from thence they had no other resource but to return towards the south end of the country, upon hearing that the Skay militia had departed from Boystile’s house two days before, and were upon their march towards Benbicula, where they flattered themselves infallibly sure to find him. About eight o’clock at night, upon the 12th of July, they put to sea from Lochaskivay, and rowed the whole night along the coast, and as the day began to dawn Neil advised them to land in Lochskiport, and to stay there ’till it was late; but the prince, who was eager to be as far on that day as possibly he could, would not condescend, and so continued their voyage the whole day. About five in the afternoon they landed at Corrodale, where they refreshed themselves ’till it was ten, and arrived next morning at sunrise at the mouth of Lochynort, in South-Wist; they had not so much as one mouthful to eat that night of any kind, and having made up a tent of the oars and sail of the boat, he laid himself down upon a kind of a heather bed[Pg 247] that was made for him, while Neil stood sentry upon the rock before the tent door the whole night, after he had placed two of the crew whom he could trust most to about a mile off as an advanced guard.

After being chased away from there, they had no choice but to head back toward the southern part of the country when they heard that the Skay militia had left Boystile’s house two days earlier and were on their way to Benbicula, where they hoped to find him for sure. Around 8 p.m. on July 12th, they set out to sea from Lochaskivay and rowed all night along the coast. As dawn approached, Neil suggested they land at Lochskiport and wait until it was later in the day, but the prince, eager to cover as much distance as possible, refused and instead continued their journey all day. They landed at Corrodale around 5 p.m., where they rested until 10, and the next morning at sunrise they arrived at the mouth of Lochynort in South-Wist. They didn't have any food that night and fashioned a tent out of the oars and sail of the boat. The prince lay down on a bed of heather that had been made for him, while Neil stood guard on the rock in front of the tent door all night, having sent two of the crew he trusted most about a mile away as an advance guard.

When it was near day he asked Neil whether it was possible to find any meat, who told him it was impracticable, by reason the nearest town lay five miles off, whereupon he roused up the rest, and got into the boat and rowed to Stialay, a small island near the entry of Loch Boystile, within three long miles of Boystile’s house, being the 14th of July in the evening. They were no sooner landed and the tent made, than Neil posted off immediately to Boystile’s house for provisions; when he arrived, he found all the family in bed, and having knocked them up, he acquainted Boystile’s daughter who came first to the door with the princes being upon the Island of Stialay, where he had but very ill accommodation. She ran into the room where her stepmother[492] was in bed, bringing Neil along with her, who told the lady the miserable condition his royal highness was in, she got up in the greatest hurry, and sent off what was readiest to relieve them in the mean time, ’till such time she could get more prepared against the next night. Neil returned, charging the lady at parting, to learn what was passing among the enemy, and to inform them accordingly.

When it was close to daybreak, he asked Neil if it was possible to find any meat, who told him it wasn’t feasible because the nearest town was five miles away. So, he woke everyone else up, got into the boat, and rowed to Stialay, a small island near the entrance of Loch Boystile, which was about three long miles from Boystile’s house, on the evening of July 14th. They had barely landed and set up the tent when Neil immediately went off to Boystile’s house for supplies. When he arrived, he found the entire family in bed. After waking them up, he informed Boystile’s daughter, who was the first to answer the door, that the prince was on the Island of Stialay and was in very poor conditions. She ran into the room where her stepmother was in bed, bringing Neil with her. He explained to the lady how miserable the royal highness was, prompting her to quickly get up and send whatever was ready to help them for the time being until she could prepare more for the next night. Neil returned, urging the lady as he left to find out what was happening with the enemy and to keep them updated.

At his arrival he found the boat ashore waiting him, and having passed to the island, the prince met him at his landing, and asked of him if he got any meat. Neil told him that he brought some fresh butter and cheese and a few bottles of brandy. ‘Come, come,’ said he, ‘give me one of the bottles and a piece of the bread, for I was never so hungry since I was born’; which being given him, he took two or three hearty pulls of it before he came near the rest, which gave him so good an appetite, that he eat that night more than ever he was seen to eat at three ordinary meals, and all the rest did proportionably. After supper he called for the brandy-bottles,[Pg 248] and drank the king’s and the duke’s healths; which done, he wrapt himself in his plaid, laid down, and slept away the remaining part of the night very soundly.

When he arrived, he found the boat waiting for him onshore. After stepping onto the island, the prince met him at the landing and asked if he had brought any food. Neil replied that he had some fresh butter and cheese and a few bottles of brandy. “Come on,” he said, “give me one of the bottles and a piece of bread, because I’ve never been this hungry in my life.” After receiving it, he took two or three big swigs from the bottle before getting to the rest of the food, which made him so hungry that he ate more that night than anyone had ever seen him eat in three regular meals combined, and everyone else ate accordingly. After dinner, he asked for the brandy bottles,[Pg 248] and toasted to the king’s and the duke’s healths. Once that was done, he wrapped himself in his plaid, lay down, and slept soundly for the rest of the night.

Next morning there was a consultation held concerning the course they were to take from thence. Some were of opinion that they should venter to run for the continent in the small boat they had, of which the prince himself approved very much, saying he would rather drown than fall into the hands of those profligate fellows who were in pursuit of him. Others were of opinion that the safest step they could take was, to make for some one of the Southren Isles of Barra, and the rather because the first party who came after him to the country landed first in that island, and it seemed very probable that they would not return there again. They all agreed to this last proposal, and that no time might be lost, they prepared every thing to set off next day, if the weather favoured them. This project came to nothing as well as the former, for the Lady Boystile sent an express that same afternoon, that one Captain Scott[493] was landed at Barra from Fort William, with a detachment of regular troops, in order to join the Skay militia in South-Wist, and that they intended, according as she was informed, to be at her house by ten o’clock next day, which she would inform him of, if possible, whatever happened.

The next morning, they held a meeting to decide what to do next. Some thought they should take a risk and try to reach the mainland in the small boat they had. The prince strongly supported this idea, saying he would rather drown than fall into the hands of the immoral people chasing him. Others believed the safest option was to head to one of the Southern Isles of Barra, especially since the first group that came after him had landed there, and it seemed likely they wouldn't return. They all agreed on this last suggestion, and to avoid wasting any time, they prepared everything to leave the next day, weather permitting. However, like the earlier plan, this one also fell through because Lady Boystile sent a message that same afternoon, informing them that a Captain Scott[493] had landed at Barra from Fort William with a group of soldiers. He planned to join the Skay militia in the South-West, and they intended to reach her house by ten o'clock the next day, which she would let him know about if she could, no matter what happened.

This news put them in a greater consternation than ever, which obliged them to cross over to the other side of Loch Boystile that night for the more security. Next day about break of day, the prince sent off Rory MacDonald to learn whither Scott was arrived, and to bring[Pg 249] back word what was passing among them. Rory returned at eight o’clock, and told the prince that the lady, her daughter, and all the servants, were tied neck and heel in one house, in order to extort a confession from them of the prince’s being in the country; while her seller and all her most valuable effects were left to the mercy of the ungenerous soldiers, who were busie in carrying the plunder to their boats. The news of the ladies ill-treatment struck such a terror into the minds of the timorous crew, that they immediately sunk the boat, and abandoned the prince and the few gentlemen who accompanied him. In this desperate condition there was no remedy to be thought upon, but to dismiss the few gentlemen that accompanied till then, and retire to the mountains; whereupon having left every body to shift for himself (of whose number was O’Sullivan, who was left under a rock with the best part of the prince’s baggage), the prince, with Neil and MacO’Neil,[494] made for the top of the nearest hill, that from thence they might have a better view of their enemies motion, and take further resolution how they were to dispose of themselves next.[495]

This news caused them more alarm than ever, prompting them to cross over to the other side of Loch Boystile that night for safety. The next day, just before dawn, the prince sent Rory MacDonald to find out if Scott had arrived and to report back on what was happening. Rory returned at eight o’clock and told the prince that the lady, her daughter, and all the servants were tied up in one house, trying to force them to confess whether the prince was in the area. Meanwhile, her seller and all her most valuable possessions were being plundered by the ruthless soldiers, who were busy taking the loot to their boats. The news of the lady’s mistreatment terrified the fearful crew so much that they immediately sank the boat and abandoned the prince and the few gentlemen with him. In this desperate situation, the only option was to send away the remaining gentlemen and retreat to the mountains. After leaving everyone to fend for themselves (including O’Sullivan, who was left under a rock with most of the prince’s baggage), the prince, along with Neil and MacO’Neil, made their way to the top of the nearest hill to get a better view of the enemy’s movements and decide how to proceed next.

I forgot to tell that when Captain Scott landed in South-Wist, Hugh MacDonald,[496] who lay in Benbicula then with his party, sent one of the country gentlemen in whom he could repose a great deal of trust, to tell the prince privately that, as it seemed now impossible for him to[Pg 250] conceal himself any longer in the country, if he would venter to be advised by him, though an enemy in appearance yet a sure friend in his heart, he would fall upon a scheme to convoy him to the Isle of Skay, where he was sure to be protected by Lady Margaret MacDonald.[497] The scheme was this: to send his stepdaughter, Miss Florence MacDonald, to Sleet, to live with her mother ’till the enemy was out of Wist. The prince at the same time was ordered to dress in woman’s close, that he might pass for her servant-maid, and Neil was appointed to take care of both. The scheme pleased the prince mightely, and he seemed very impatient to see it put in execution.

I forgot to mention that when Captain Scott landed in South-Wist, Hugh MacDonald, who was staying in Benbicula with his group, sent one of the local gentlemen he trusted a lot to inform the prince privately that, since it seemed impossible for him to hide in the area any longer, if he would be willing to take his advice, even though he appeared to be an enemy, he was actually a true friend at heart. He had a plan to escort him to the Isle of Skay, where he would surely be safe with Lady Margaret MacDonald. The plan was to send his stepdaughter, Miss Florence MacDonald, to Sleet to stay with her mother until the enemy left Wist. At the same time, the prince was instructed to dress in women’s clothing so he could pass as her lady’s maid, and Neil was assigned to take care of both. The plan greatly pleased the prince, and he seemed very eager to see it carried out.

But to return to the top of the hill, the prince with Neil and Mr. O’Neil remained there the whole day. About sunset the prince told Neil that he entrusted himself in his hands, and that his life and safety depended upon him, Neil answered that the charge was more than what his life was worth; but yet, with God’s assistance that he would find means to preserve him from all danger till every thing was got ready to leave the country. After this they took a refreshment of bread-and-cheese, and set out towards the north end of the country, every body carrying his own share of the baggage, the prince carried his own few shirts, O’Neill carried his own linnen, and Neil carried the provision, his own gun and sword, and the prince’s fusee and one of his holsters, while the other hung upon his own belt. As they were going on, the prince clapt Neil’s shoulder, often telling him if ever it was their good fortune to get free of their present troubles, he would make him live easie all his days for the fatigue of that night. Neil was informed some days before, that Miss Flora lived with her brother in a glen near Locheynort, where they had all their cattle a grazing at that time, and which happened to be very near the rod they were to pass that night.[498]

But to go back to the top of the hill, the prince, Neil, and Mr. O’Neil stayed there all day. Around sunset, the prince told Neil that he was putting his life and safety in his hands. Neil replied that this responsibility was worth more than his life, but he would, with God's help, find a way to keep him safe until everything was ready to leave the country. After that, they had a snack of bread and cheese and set off toward the north end of the country, everyone carrying their own share of the luggage. The prince carried a few of his shirts, O’Neill took his own linens, and Neil carried the supplies, his own gun and sword, the prince’s fusil, and one of his holsters, while the other was attached to his own belt. As they walked, the prince slapped Neil on the shoulder, often saying that if they were fortunate enough to get out of their current troubles, he would make sure Neil had an easy life for all his days to repay him for the effort that night. Neil had learned a few days earlier that Miss Flora was living with her brother in a glen near Locheynort, where they were grazing all their cattle at that time, which happened to be very close to the road they would pass that night.[498]

[Pg 251]

[Pg 251]

When the prince was informed of it, he would needs go to see her, and tell her of the message he had from her stepfather. When they were near the little house where she was asleep, for her brother was not at home, Neil left the prince and O’Neil at a little distance off,’till he went in and wakened her; she got scarcely on the half of her close, when the prince, with his baggage upon his back, was at the door, and saluted her very kindly; after which she brought to him a part of the best cheer she had, among the rest was a large bowl full of creme, of which he took two or three hearty go-downs, and his fellow-travellers swallowed the rest.

When the prince heard about it, he had to go see her and tell her the message he got from her stepfather. As they approached the little house where she was sleeping—her brother was not home—Neil stayed back a bit with the prince and O’Neil until he went in to wake her up. She barely got half-dressed when the prince, with his backpack on, arrived at the door and greeted her warmly. After that, she offered him some of her best food, including a large bowl of cream, from which he took two or three hearty spoonfuls, and his traveling companions finished the rest.

He discovered to her her stepfather’s proposal, and ask’t whether she was willing to run the risque. She joyfully accepted of the offer without the least hesitation, and that no time might be lost, she was ordered immediately away to Benbicula to consult with her step-father and the Lady Clanranald, to get every thing in readiness as soon as possible, and to send them word back again next day how all was going on with them. Having taken leave of Miss Flora, they pursued their journey, and about sunrise they arrived upon the side of a hill three miles from Corrodale, where they sate down under a rock in order to take some rest. The prince, as he took no victuals the night before, complained of hunger, and ask’t of Neil if he had any thing to eat; Neil gave him a piece of bread-and-cheese that Miss MacDonald had given him the night before. After he eat of it very heartily, he laid himself down and slept, while Neil stood sentry upon him all the time; when he and O’Neil was[Pg 252] sufficiently rested, he ordered Neil to take some rest, and sent O’Neil to mount guard in his turn.

He told her about her stepfather’s proposal and asked if she was willing to take the risk. She happily accepted the offer without any hesitation, and to make sure there was no delay, she was sent right away to Benbicula to consult with her stepfather and Lady Clanranald to get everything ready as soon as possible, and to send them an update the next day on how things were progressing. After saying goodbye to Miss Flora, they continued their journey, and around sunrise, they reached a hillside three miles from Corrodale, where they sat down under a rock to rest. The prince, having had no food the night before, complained of hunger and asked Neil if he had anything to eat. Neil gave him a piece of bread and cheese that Miss MacDonald had given him the night before. After eating it heartily, he lay down and slept, while Neil kept watch over him the whole time; once he and O’Neil were sufficiently rested, he ordered Neil to take a break and sent O’Neil to keep guard in his place.

When it was drawn late, the prince ask’t Neil if there was any possibility of getting any supper; Neil told him he would find enough, and leaving the prince and O’Neil under the same rock, he went and bought abundance of such cheer as the neighbourhood could afford. The prince was prodigious impatient the whole afternoon for Miss Flora’s answer, and despairing to hear a word from her that night, he sent off Neil, at eight o’clock at night, to Benbicula, with strict orders to be back next day at four in the afternoon, under pain of gaining his displeasure for ever. Neil, notwithstanding the fatigue and the length of the journey (which was thirty miles backward and forward), willingly condescended.

When it got late, the prince asked Neil if there was any chance of getting some dinner. Neil told him he would find plenty, and after leaving the prince and O’Neil under the same rock, he went to get as much food as the area could provide. The prince was extremely impatient all afternoon waiting for Miss Flora’s response, and fearing he wouldn’t hear a word from her that night, he sent Neil off to Benbicula at eight o'clock, with strict orders to be back by four the next afternoon, or else he’d be in serious trouble. Despite the fatigue and the long journey (which was thirty miles round trip), Neil agreed willingly.

When he arrived at the fourds which seperates Benbicula from South Wist,[499] he found them all guard’d by the Skay militia, who had placed sentries within a gun shot of each other from east to west; their consigne was to let pass no person whatsoever until he was examined first by the captain of the guard; by this means Neil was stopped, and was kept prisoner there till next morning, when it was low water Neil was sent away to the captain of the guard on the other side, who happened to be Hugh MacDonald; when Neil went in he found Miss MacDonald, who was stopped in the same manner by another party of the MacLeods, who had the guard two nights before, with some other gentlemen at breakfast with Mr. MacDonald. Neil call’d miss aside, and ask’t if every thing was ready, she told him as it was put out of her power to go on the length of the Lady Clanranald, that nothing was as yet done, but that she was going off within half an hour after to consult with the lady, and designed to go to Roshiness, both of them, that same afternoon, and carry along with them whatever clothes or provisions was requisite for the voyage, and she begg’d of Neil to make[Pg 253] all the hast possible to return to the prince, and, without losing one moment of time, to make the best of his way to Rosshiness, where he would be sure to find them without fail.

When he arrived at the fords that separate Benbicula from South Wist, [499] he found them all guarded by the Skay militia, who had placed sentries within gunshot of each other from east to west. Their orders were to let no one pass until they had been examined by the captain of the guard. Because of this, Neil was stopped and kept as a prisoner until the next morning. When it was low tide, Neil was sent to the captain of the guard on the other side, who happened to be Hugh MacDonald. When Neil entered, he found Miss MacDonald, who had been stopped in the same way by another party of the MacLeods, who had been on guard two nights before, along with some other gentlemen having breakfast with Mr. MacDonald. Neil called Miss MacDonald aside and asked if everything was ready. She told him that since it was beyond her power to go as far as Lady Clanranald's, nothing had been done yet, but she planned to leave within half an hour to consult with the lady. They both intended to go to Roshiness that same afternoon, bringing along any clothes or provisions necessary for the journey. She urged Neil to hurry back to the prince and, without wasting a moment, to make his way to Roshiness, where he would surely find them.

Neil posted off immediately, and arrived at the prince at the hour he had appointed, and found him under the same rock where he had left him; he no sooner saw Neil come in sight than he ran to meet him, and took him by the hand asking what news he had from Miss Flora; Neil told him what orders he had from the lady (as he called Miss Flora), after which they set out for Roshiness. The greatest difficulty for this journey was to find a boat to go by sea, as it was impossible to venture by land, because, as I have already told, all the fourds were guarded by the MacLeods; but God, who always provided whatever he had occasion for, removed this difficulty also, for when they arrived at the side of Lochskiport, there they found four country people who had come there some days before to fish, with a small yawl.

Neil set off right away and reached the prince at the time he had arranged, finding him under the same rock where he had left him. As soon as he spotted Neil, he ran to meet him, taking his hand and asking what news he had from Miss Flora. Neil relayed the lady’s instructions (as he referred to Miss Flora), and then they set off for Roshiness. The biggest challenge for this journey was finding a boat to travel by sea, since venturing overland was impossible because, as I mentioned before, all the fords were guarded by the MacLeods. But God, who always provided what was needed, took away this obstacle as well; when they arrived at the shore of Lochskiport, they found four locals who had come there a few days earlier to fish, with a small yawl.

Neil knew them immediately, and agreed with them for to ferry him and two other gentlemen that were with him over to Fouay, where they expected to meet with Ranald MacDonald (called Walpole);[500] but when they landed upon the island they found no living soul of either man or beast upon it; being, at this time, clear daylight, they could not bring the boat no further, for fear to be seen from the land, wherefore they ordered the boat men to land them on the nearest rock of Benbicula, that from thence they might go afoot to Roshiness, which done, Neil payed the boatmen and sent them away home.

Neil recognized them right away and agreed to have them take him and two other gentlemen with him over to Fouay, where they were supposed to meet Ranald MacDonald (known as Walpole). However, when they arrived on the island, they discovered no one around, no man or animal in sight. Since it was broad daylight, they couldn't bring the boat in any closer for fear of being spotted from the shore. So, they instructed the boatmen to drop them off on the nearest rock of Benbicula, so they could walk to Roshiness from there. Once that was done, Neil paid the boatmen and sent them home.

The prince sate down upon the rock where they had land’d, and, being quite overcome for want of rest, he fell asleep, and so did O’Neil; during the time they slept Neil thought proper to take a walk round about[Pg 254] for fear that any body should come upon them at any unawares; but he had not gone ten yards from them, when he observed an arm of the sea come in betwixt him and the rest of the land, which formed an island; he returned immediately and informed the prince, who started up like a mad man and walked to the end of the island at such a rate as if he had a mind to fly over to the other side, but his career was soon stopped; whereupon he fell a scoulding Neil as if it had been his fault, and the curse rascals (meaning the boatmen) who land’d them upon that desert island designedly that he might starve with hunger and cold, in short, there was no pacifying him till, at last, Neil told him to comfort himself, that he would sweem over to the other side and would bring a boat in half an hour’s time, from that moment he never gave Neil one minute’s rest, till, to please him, he began to strip, notwithstanding that it rained most prodigiously, when luckily Neil observed a rock appearing in the middle of the sound, and begg’d of the prince to allow him a little more time, that it seem’d very probable at low water they could pass over with dry feet without being obliged to hazard his life by sweeming, which was to be the ultimate resource, which happened accordingly, for in less than three quarters of an hour’s time, they passed over without wetting the soles of their shoes.[501]

The prince sat down on the rock where they had landed, and, completely exhausted from lack of rest, he fell asleep, as did O’Neil. While they slept, Neil thought it was a good idea to take a walk around[Pg 254] in case anyone stumbled upon them unexpectedly. But he hadn’t gone more than ten yards when he noticed an arm of the sea coming between him and the rest of the land, creating an island. He quickly went back to inform the prince, who jumped up like a madman and rushed to the end of the island as if he wanted to fly over to the other side, but he was soon stopped. He then started scolding Neil as if it were his fault, cursing the boatmen (whom he referred to as rascals) who had deliberately landed them on that deserted island so he could starve from hunger and cold. In short, he couldn’t be calmed down until Neil told him to comfort himself, saying he would swim to the other side and bring a boat back in half an hour. From that moment on, the prince wouldn’t give Neil a moment's peace until, to satisfy him, he began to strip, even though it was raining heavily. Luckily, Neil spotted a rock appearing in the middle of the channel and begged the prince for a little more time, explaining that it seemed likely they could cross over with dry feet at low tide without risking his life by swimming, which would be the last resort. This turned out to be true, as in less than three quarters of an hour, they crossed over without wetting the soles of their shoes.

The prince seem’d as well pleased when he got out of that labyrinth as if he was landed in France; he was so cold (for the rain pierced to his very skin) that he trembled, the moor being so plain that there was not the least bush, eminence, or hill to cover him from the weather, and he was so hungry that he was not able to walk, having eaten not a mouthful of any kind since the evening before.[Pg 255] In this deplorable condition it was hard to determine how to behave, but as there was no time to be lost, despite of rain and weather, he continued his journey for Roshiness, where he expected to find the ladies before him that night. When they had walkt about a quarter of a mile, they lighted accidentally upon two sheelings, where two of Clanranald’s tennants stay’d, who, seeing them coming, came to meet them. Neil, to prevent their coming too nigh, stept on and met them; they enquired what were these other two that came along with him.

The prince seemed just as happy when he emerged from that maze as if he had just arrived in France. He was so cold (the rain soaked him completely) that he was shivering, and the open moor offered no bushes, hills, or anything to protect him from the weather. He was so hungry he could barely walk, having not eaten anything since the previous evening.[Pg 255] In this miserable state, it was tough to know what to do, but since he couldn't afford to waste any time, he pressed on toward Roshiness, where he hoped to meet up with the ladies that night. After they had walked about a quarter of a mile, they stumbled upon two sheilings where two of Clanranald’s tenants were staying. Seeing them approach, the tenants came out to greet them. To keep them from getting too close, Neil stepped forward to meet them. They asked who the other two were that were with him.

Neil satisfied their curiosity by telling them they were poor Irish gentlemen, who made their escape from Culloden, and run to the country for shelter, and that it was an act of charity if they had any kind of eatables to give them some refreshment, for that they had not tasted meat for eight-and-forty hours before, whereupon the honest fellows order’d them to go in; the door of the hut was so low and narrow, that the prince was obliged to creep upon his belly. There they feasted splendidly upon such cheer as there was to be had, which was mostly milk kind; being thus sufficiently refreshed they went off, and as Neil was not thoroughly acquainted in that rod, he brought one of the fellows with him for a guide to whom he gave half a guinea for his pains. When they were within three miles of Roshiness, being at that time five in the afternoon, they laid down in a lock side among high heather, which was all the shelter they had from the rain.

Neil satisfied their curiosity by telling them that they were poor Irish gentlemen who had escaped from Culloden and fled to the countryside for shelter. He explained that it would be a charitable act if they had any food to spare, as they hadn't eaten meat in forty-eight hours. The honest men then invited them inside; the door of the hut was so low and narrow that the prince had to crawl in on his belly. Inside, they enjoyed a hearty meal with what little food was available, mostly dairy. Once they felt rejuvenated, they set off again. Since Neil was not very familiar with that route, he brought along one of the men as a guide and gave him half a guinea for his help. When they were within three miles of Roshiness, at about five in the afternoon, they lay down by a small lake surrounded by tall heather, which was all the shelter they had from the rain.

There they past the remaining part of the day, the prince shivering with cold all the time. When it was late, they set out for Rosshiness, the night turned so dark that they could not see three yards before them, and the rain was so vehement, with the wind blowing directly in their teeth, that they could scarcely look where to set their foot; besides the rod was so very bad, that the prince, despite of what care Neil and O’Neil could take of him, fell at almost every step in some ditch or mire, where, very often, he lost his shoes, which gave Neil a vast deal of trouble and pains before he could fish them[Pg 256] up again, being sometimes obliged to put his hand to the very shoulder in the puddle for them.

They spent the rest of the day there, with the prince shivering from the cold the whole time. When it got late, they headed for Rosshiness. The night became so dark that they couldn’t see three yards ahead, and the rain was so heavy, with the wind blowing right in their faces, that they could barely see where to put their feet. On top of that, the path was in such bad shape that, despite all the care Neil and O’Neil took, the prince fell into a ditch or mud nearly every step, often losing his shoes, which caused Neil a lot of trouble and hassle as he tried to retrieve them, sometimes having to reach into the puddle up to his shoulder for them. [Pg 256]

After having surmounted all these troubles and difficulties, they at last arrived in the long wished for harbour. When they came near the house, Neil left the prince and O’Neil about a cannon-shot off, while he himself went in to see whether the ladies were come; but finding none but the man who took care of the house in bed with his wife, who told him that twenty of the Skay militia who landed there two days before, were in a tent about a quarter of a mile of the house, he returned to the prince with that dismal news, which so enraged him, that he was like to tear his clothes in pieces, not knowing where to run for safety, the enemy being every where.

After overcoming all those troubles and challenges, they finally reached the long-awaited harbor. As they approached the house, Neil left the prince and O’Neil about the distance of a cannon shot away while he went inside to check if the ladies had arrived. However, he found only the caretaker in bed with his wife, who informed him that twenty members of the Skay militia, who had landed there two days earlier, were in a tent about a quarter of a mile from the house. He returned to the prince with that disheartening news, which made him so furious that he felt like tearing his clothes apart, not knowing where to run for safety since the enemy was everywhere.

The guide, though he did not understand the language they spoke, yet understood the confusion they were in, told them there was one of Clanranald’s boomen[502] not far off, into whose house they might go with safety till they came to a further resolution. They immediately betook themselves thither, and I leave the reader to judge what a bonny figure they made when they came to examine themselves before light, all bespattered with dirt and mud, after the foregoing night’s walk. There he resolved to return Neil to Nuntown[503] to inform Miss MacDonald that he was arrived, and to hasten her to come without any longer delay.

The guide, although he didn't understand their language, recognized their confusion and told them there was one of Clanranald’s men not far away, whose house they could safely go to until they figured things out. They quickly headed there, and I’ll let the reader imagine how messy they looked when they assessed themselves in the morning light, all covered in dirt and mud from the previous night's trek. There, he decided to send Neil back to Nuntown to let Miss MacDonald know he had arrived and to urge her to come without any further delays.

Neil, who foresaw clearly the danger he would be exposed to, if he was left with a man who knew not one step of the country, or where to retire to in case of necessity, absolutely denied to part with the prince upon any account, and so Mr. O’Neill was obliged to go upon that expedition; who was mighty well pleased to be entrusted with that embassy, not so much to further the prince’s affairs, as to be in company with Miss Flora, for whom he professed a great deal of kindness at that time. About[Pg 257] break of day, the Booman’s wife told Neil that it was dangerous for them to stay in the house any longer because the militia were wont to come every morning to buy milk, whereupon Neil and his pupil went and lodged under a rock pretty near the shore, where the Booman sent one of his derry maids to give them notice from time to time, what was passing among their neighbour enemies.

Neil, who clearly saw the danger he would face if he stayed with a man who didn’t know anything about the area or where to go in case of an emergency, absolutely refused to let the prince go for any reason. This meant Mr. O’Neill had to go on that mission, and he was quite happy to be given that task, not so much to help the prince but to be with Miss Flora, for whom he expressed a lot of affection at that time. Around[Pg 257] dawn, the Booman’s wife warned Neil that it wasn’t safe for them to stay in the house any longer since the militia would usually come every morning to buy milk. So, Neil and his student went and took shelter under a rock near the shore, where the Booman sent one of his farm girls to keep them updated on what was happening with their neighboring enemies.

It is almost inexpressible what torment the prince suffered under that unhappy rock which had neither height nor bredth to cover him from the rain which poured down upon him so thick as if all the windows of heaven had broke open, and, to compleat his tortures, there lay such a swarm of mitches upon his face and hands as would have made any other but himself fall into despair, which, notwithstanding his incomparable patience, made him utter such hideous cries and complaints as would have rent the rocks with compassion.

It’s hard to describe the torment the prince experienced under that miserable rock, which offered neither height nor width to shield him from the rain that poured down like all the windows of heaven had burst open. To make his suffering worse, there was such a swarm of bugs on his face and hands that it would have driven anyone else to despair. Despite his incredible patience, he let out such horrible cries and complaints that they would have moved the rocks to compassion.

Neil, who stood all this time aside him, could be of no more service to him than to let run to the ground the rain which stagnated in the lurks of the plaid wherein he lay wrapt. In this miserable condition he continued for about three hours, till their faithful scoote came for the last time, and told them they might return to the house, for that the militia was gone; Neil helped him to his feet, and they marched away to the house, where the good derrymaid took care to make a roozing fire for their coming. He was no sooner entered but Neil stripped him of all his clothes from top to toe, and hung rops round the house to dry them on; he sate down in his shirt at the fireside as merry and hearty as if he was in the best room at Whitehall.

Neil, who had been standing beside him this whole time, could do nothing more than let the rain that had pooled in the folds of the blanket he was wrapped in run off. In this miserable state, he remained for about three hours until their loyal scoote came for the last time and told them they could return to the house since the militia had left; Neil helped him to his feet, and they walked back to the house, where the kind servant made sure to start a warm fire for them. As soon as he stepped inside, Neil stripped him of all his clothes and hung them around the house to dry; he sat down in his shirt by the fire, feeling as cheerful and comfortable as if he were in the finest room at Whitehall.

After he had warmed himself, he desired Neil to ask the wife if she had any eatables. She said that she had nothing except a chapin of milk she kept for her bairns, which Neil desired her to warm in a pot, and when it was hot to froth it up with the machine made for that purpose. When all was ready, the wife placed the pot before the prince and Neil, and gave them two horn spoons as coarse as ever was made use of, the prince ask’t Neil[Pg 258] what it was, who told it was fresh creme, he not doubting but it was really so, and at the same time believing it to be solid, pushed his hand to the very wrist in the scalded milk, which made him draw back his hand in the greatest hurry, all full of wrath, and dropt his spoon in the pot. Neil had all the difficulty imaginable to keep his gravity, to hear him curse the wife and her pot a hundred times, calling her a vile witch for (says he) she contrived it a purpose that we might burn ourselves. Neil, seeing him altogether out of humour, in order to pacify him, told he would take a stick and labour her to an inch of her life with it, and immediately ran to an oar of the boat that was lying before him to knock out her brains. The prince, believing him to be serious, begged of him not to touch her, for, if he came to do her any hurt, she would certainly run off and bring a party upon them.

After he had warmed up, he asked Neil to check with the woman if she had any food. She said she only had a jug of milk that she kept for her kids, which Neil requested her to heat in a pot. Once it was hot, he wanted her to froth it up with the tool made for that. When everything was ready, the woman set the pot in front of the prince and Neil and handed them two very rough horn spoons. The prince asked Neil what it was, and Neil told him it was fresh cream. Believing it to be solid, the prince pushed his hand all the way to the wrist into the scalding milk, causing him to quickly pull back his hand in anger and drop his spoon in the pot. Neil had a hard time keeping a straight face while he heard the prince curse the woman and her pot a hundred times, calling her a terrible witch for, as he said, wanting them to burn themselves. Seeing the prince in such a foul mood, Neil tried to calm him down by saying he would grab a stick and beat her within an inch of her life, and he immediately went to grab an oar from the boat in front of him to whack her. The prince, thinking Neil was serious, begged him not to hurt her because if he did, she would surely run off and get others to come after them.

After this repas, the prince inclined to sleep a little, as he rested none the night before; but to get a bed for him was the question—in short, there was no better shift than to take the leaf of the door, and lay it down upon the floor, and spread an old ragged sail over it, which Neil found in the house; there he slept some hours wrapt in his wet plaid. The guide, who went with O’Neil the night before to Clanranald’s house, returned towards evening, who brought along with him a rosted fowl, and a couples of bottles of wine, and a letter from O’Neil to the prince, the contents of which I could not find out, though it’s very probable he excused himself for not returning, under pretence to hasten all matters for leaving the country. The prince supp’t very heartily upon what the lady had sent him, and afterwards slept soundly upon a heather bed, which Neil made for him.

After the meal, the prince felt like taking a short nap since he hadn’t rested the night before. But finding a bed for him was a challenge—so, they decided to just take a door leaf, lay it on the floor, and spread an old, worn sail over it, which Neil found in the house. He slept like that for a few hours, wrapped in his damp plaid. The guide who had gone with O’Neil to Clanranald’s house the night before returned in the evening, bringing a roasted chicken, a couple of bottles of wine, and a letter from O’Neil to the prince. I couldn’t figure out what it said, but it was likely O’Neil was explaining why he hadn’t come back, saying he was busy making arrangements to leave the country. The prince enjoyed the meal that the lady had sent him and later slept soundly on a heather bed that Neil made for him.

Next morning the prince wrote a letter to O’Neil by the same post that brought the former, desiring him to come to him that night; but O’Neil contented himself to return him an answer by the same bearer, telling him he could not come by reason that he waited Miss McDonald and the Lady Clanranald, who was to come next day without fail.

Next morning, the prince wrote a letter to O’Neil with the same post that delivered the first, asking him to come see him that night. However, O’Neil chose to respond through the same messenger, telling him he couldn't come because he was waiting for Miss McDonald and Lady Clanranald, who was definitely coming the next day.

[Pg 259]

[Pg 259]

The prince waited that day in the house of Roshiness. Next morning Neil carried him to a hill half way betwixt Roshiness and Nuntown;[504] there they lay till the evening, when they returned to their former quarters.

The prince waited that day in the house of Roshiness. The next morning, Neil took him to a hill halfway between Roshiness and Nuntown;[504] there they stayed until the evening, when they went back to their previous accommodations.

The prince seemed very uneasie that night that neither Mac O’Neil nor the ladys did not come according to promise; but the truth is, thay could not really come sooner, as they were busie night and day to get his dress made for the prince, and whatever other things he might have occasion for. The next day Rory McDonald, and one John McDonald, who were to be two of our crew, arrived in the morning, and told that both boat and crew were ready whenever he pleased.

The prince seemed very uneasy that night because neither Mac O’Neil nor the ladies showed up as promised; but the truth is, they couldn’t come sooner since they were busy night and day getting his outfit ready for the prince, along with anything else he might need. The next day, Rory McDonald and a guy named John McDonald, who were going to be part of our crew, arrived in the morning and said that both the boat and the crew were ready whenever he wanted.

Whereupon Neil carried the prince to the same hill where they had sculked the day before, and leaving him in the hands of the two McDonalds before mentioned, posted off himself to hurry the ladys from Nuntown, and sent off O’Neil directly to the place where he left the prince when himself went with the Lady Clan, Miss Flora McDonald, Clanranald’s daughter, and Mr. McDonald of Milltown, Miss Flora’s brother, about another rod, where they were to have the conveniency of a boat to Roshiness.

Neil took the prince to the same hill where they had hidden the day before, and after leaving him with the two McDonalds mentioned earlier, he hurried off to bring the ladies from Nuntown. He sent O’Neil right to the spot where he left the prince when he went with Lady Clan, Miss Flora McDonald, the daughter of Clanranald, and Mr. McDonald of Milltown, Miss Flora’s brother, to get a boat to Roshiness.

The prince, who arrived first, welcomed them ashore, and handed the Lady Clan to the house, while O’Neil took care of Miss Flora. There they passed some hours very hearty and merry till supper was served, which was scarce began, when one of Clanranald’s herds came with the news that General Campbell[505] was landing his men[Pg 260] within three miles of them. The supper thus ended, which was hardly begun—all run to their boat in the greatest confusion, every one carrying with him whatever part of the baggage came first to his hand, without either regard to sex or quality, they crossed Lochisguiway,[506] and, about five in the morning, landed on the other side, where they ended the supper.

The prince, who arrived first, welcomed them ashore and took the Lady Clan to the house, while O’Neil attended to Miss Flora. They spent a few hours enjoying each other's company until supper was served. Just as they started, one of Clanranald’s herds brought the news that General Campbell[505] was landing his troops within three miles of them. With that, supper, which had barely begun, came to an abrupt end. Everyone rushed to their boat in total chaos, grabbing whatever pieces of luggage were closest, regardless of gender or status. They crossed Lochisguiway,[506] and landed on the other side around five in the morning, where they finished their supper.

About eight a servant came to the Lady Clanranald to acquaint her that General Campbell, with a party of his men, were at her house, and wanted that she should be there before twelve of the clock otherwise that her house should suffer for all. Here the lady and her daughter took leave of the prince and went off. Great was the debate betwixt Miss Flora and O’Neil upon this occasion, who insisted strongly to leave the country with the prince; but Miss McDonald would never condescend, because he being a stranger, and consequently did not speak the language of the country, would readily be taken notice of by the common sort, and so took leave of the prince and Miss, made the best of his way to South Wist along with Milltown.

About eight, a servant came to Lady Clanranald to let her know that General Campbell, along with some of his men, was at her house and wanted her to arrive before twelve o'clock; otherwise, her house would face consequences. At this, the lady and her daughter said goodbye to the prince and left. There was a heated discussion between Miss Flora and O’Neil at that moment, as he strongly urged her to leave the country with the prince. However, Miss McDonald would never agree, arguing that since he was a stranger and didn’t speak the local language, he would easily attract attention from the locals. So, she said goodbye to the prince and Miss, and made her way to South Wist with Milltown.

The company being gone, the prince, stript of his own cloaths, was dressed by Miss Flora in his new attire, but could not keep his hands from adjusting his head dress, which he cursed a thousand times. There they lay till the evening, waiting impatiently for the night to set off. Here they were alarmed by five wherries, the same, as they supposed, that landed the Campbells the night before in Benbicula, supposing, by taking this precaution, to keep the prince from making his escape. But their fears were soon over; for the wherries sailed by to the southward without ever stopping. After sunset they got into their boat, which was managed by the following persons—Rory McDonald, John McDonald, John McMurich, Duncan Campbell, and Rory McDonald of Glengary family; the prince passed for Miss McDonald’s maid, and Neil McDonald in the quality of a servant.[507]

The company gone, the prince, stripped of his own clothes, was dressed by Miss Flora in his new outfit, but he couldn’t stop adjusting his headpiece, cursing it a thousand times. They waited there until evening, impatient for nightfall to set off. They were then alarmed by five boats, which they thought were the same ones that had brought the Campbells to Benbicula the night before, assuming this precaution was meant to prevent the prince from escaping. However, their worries quickly faded as the boats sailed south without stopping. After sunset, they got into their boat, which was handled by the following people—Rory McDonald, John McDonald, John McMurich, Duncan Campbell, and Rory McDonald from the Glengary family; the prince pretended to be Miss McDonald’s maid, and Neil McDonald acted as a servant.[507]

[Pg 261]

[Pg 261]

The weather proving calm in the beginning of the night, they rowed away at a good rate; but, about twelve, there blew a gale of westerly wind, which eased the Rowers not little, but at the same time there came on such thick mist as robbed them of the sight of all lands; great was the debate among the boatmen upon this occasion, some asserted that they lost their course, while others maintained the contrary, till their dispute end’d at last to cease rowing till day would decide their error. In the morning, the weather being quite clear, they rowed along the coast of Sky, but the wind, shifting about to the north, blew at nine o’clock so strong in their teeth, that for an hour and a half it was impossible to discern whether they made any way or not.

The weather was calm at the start of the night, so they rowed along smoothly. However, around midnight, a strong westerly wind blew in, making it tough for the rowers. At the same time, a thick fog rolled in, obscuring their view of the land completely. This led to a heated debate among the boatmen; some argued that they had lost their way, while others disagreed. Eventually, they decided to stop rowing until morning to figure out what went wrong. By morning, the weather was clear, and they continued rowing along the coast of Skye. But the wind had shifted to the north and was blowing so hard at nine o'clock that for an hour and a half, they couldn’t tell if they were making any progress at all.

The prince, who, all this time, was not in the least discouraged, encouraged them to row still better, saying that he would relieve him that was most fatigued. The poor men, almost ready to breathe out their last, at length made the point of Watersay on the north corner of the Isle of Sky, where, having got into a cliff in a rock, they rested themselves for an hour, and at the same time revived their drooping spirits with a plentiful repas of bread and butter, while the water that fell from the top of the rock furnished them drink.

The prince, who wasn’t discouraged at all this time, encouraged them to row even harder, saying he would take over for whoever was most tired. The poor men, nearly exhausted, finally reached the point of Watersay on the north corner of the Isle of Skye. There, they found a ledge in the rock where they rested for an hour and boosted their spirits with a generous meal of bread and butter, while the water cascading from the top of the rock provided them with something to drink.

This gave them fresh vigour for to undertake the remaining part of their labour, the weather being quite calm again, they rowed round the point close by the land. They had not gone far on the other side, when they spyed two centrys upon shore, one of whom approached nearer, and ordered them to put to, but they rowed the faster; which he observing, advanced as far as the sea would permitt him, bad them put to, a second time in a more threatning manner, and seeing them like not to obey, he cocked his piece, which he thought to fire upon them, but, as Providence ordered it, she misgave, and so he was disappointed. The other who look’d on all this time, made to heels to a neighbouring village, about a cannon shot off, to acquaint their officer (if there was any) of what had happened.

This gave them a boost of energy to tackle the rest of their work. With the weather calm again, they rowed around the point close to the shore. They hadn't gone far when they spotted two guards on the beach, one of whom came closer and ordered them to stop. But they rowed even faster. Seeing this, he advanced as far as the water would allow and told them to stop a second time, this time more threateningly. When he saw they weren't going to obey, he cocked his gun, intending to fire at them, but, as fate would have it, the gun misfired, and he was let down. The other guard, who had been watching the whole time, ran off to a nearby village about a cannon shot away to inform their officer (if there was one) about what had happened.

[Pg 262]

[Pg 262]

The boatmen, justly judging what he was going about, made them now row for dear blood. They very soon saw the event of their conjectures, for a body of about fifteen men, full armed, marched straight from the village to the rock, where their centry was post’d, and if they had the presence of mind to launch out one of their boats (of which they had two close by them) we must have been inevitably taken.

The boatmen, realizing what was happening, urged them to row for their lives. They quickly saw their assumptions confirmed, as a group of about fifteen armed men marched straight from the village to the rock where their sentry was stationed. If they had the presence of mind to launch one of their boats (of which they had two nearby), we would have inevitably been captured.

The prince by this time was sensible of his error in not allowing the men at parting from Uist to have any arms in the boat, which if they had had, were fully resolved to fight it out to the last man, notwithstanding the inequality of numbers. The enemy seeing it quite out of their power to execute their design in coming thither, as we got fairly out of their reach, took a walk along the shore, without giving the prince or crew any uneasiness, further than to gaze at them till they landed in Kilbride in Troterniss within a cannon shot of Sir Alexander McDonald’s house,[508] twelve miles from the place where we saw the enemy.

The prince now realized it was a mistake not to let the men leaving Uist have any weapons in the boat. If they had, they were prepared to fight to the last man, despite being outnumbered. The enemy saw that it was impossible to carry out their plan since we had successfully moved out of their reach, so they just walked along the shore without causing any trouble to the prince or his crew, aside from watching them until they landed in Kilbride in Troterniss, which is within cannon range of Sir Alexander McDonald's house, twelve miles from where we had spotted the enemy.

In the neighbourhood of this place was another party of the Sky militia, who was post’d there to examine all boats that came from the isles, as they were pretty well assured that the prince was there at that time. Miss and Neil having kept the prince in the boat as well as they could, went to the house, leaving strict orders with the boatmen not to stir from it till they came back, or some word from them, and in case their curiosity led any body[Pg 263] thither, who might perhaps take the liberty to ask who was the person kept in the boat, to answer Miss McDonald’s maid, and to curse her for a lazy jade, what was she good for, since she did not attend her Mrs.

In the area nearby, there was another group of Sky militia set up to check all boats coming from the islands, as they were pretty sure the prince was there at that time. Miss and Neil did their best to keep the prince hidden in the boat and went to the house, giving strict instructions to the boatmen not to leave until they returned or sent word. If anyone's curiosity led them to the boat and they asked who was in it, the boatmen were to say it was Miss McDonald’s maid and complain about her being lazy, questioning what she was good for since she wasn't attending to her mistress.

When they were come near the house, they were informed by a servant that Sir Alexander was gone for Fort Augustus some days before to wait upon Cumberland, and that there was no company with the lady but two gentlemen, to wit, McDonald of Kingsbourg,[509] and Lieutenant McLeod,[510] commander of the party before mentioned, and one Mrs. McDonald who came the day before from North Wist, and who was so strictly examined by the party upon the point of Waternish (taking her to be the prince in disguise), that she was at all the pains imaginable to keep off the soldiers’ hands from examining her person too closely, which must have been the Prince’s fate had he fallen into their hands.

When they got close to the house, a servant informed them that Sir Alexander had left for Fort Augustus a few days earlier to meet Cumberland, and that the only company the lady had was two gentlemen: McDonald of Kingsbourg,[509] and Lieutenant McLeod,[510] who was in charge of the previously mentioned party, along with Mrs. McDonald, who had arrived the day before from North Wist. She had been closely questioned by the party at Waternish (as they suspected her to be the prince in disguise), and she went to great lengths to prevent the soldiers from searching her too thoroughly, which would have been the prince’s fate had he been caught by them.

Miss Flora having met with one Miss McDonald, Lady Margarate’s gentlewoman, sent her to acquaint her lady that she wanted to speak to her, who came back and carried Miss Flora to the lady’s apartment, where she told all the circumstances of the prince’s escape from the isles, and that she must harbour him as he came now under her protection.

Miss Flora ran into Miss McDonald, Lady Margarate’s companion, and asked her to inform Lady Margarate that she wanted to speak with her. Miss McDonald returned and guided Miss Flora to the lady’s room, where she explained everything about the prince’s escape from the islands and that he needed to be sheltered since he was now under her protection.

The lady, in the greatest perplexity, was at a loss how to behave upon this occasion, for her hurry and impatience hindred her to fall upon proper means to get the prince conveyed privately to the house, especially at such an improper hour as eleven o’clock of the day. Whereupon she sent for Kingsborough, to whom she disclosed the whole secret. Kingsborough, without being in the least discomposed, explained to her the danger the[Pg 264] prince and her would be exposed to if she insisted to have him brought to her house, where she was to entertain one of the king’s officers that day, who could not miss to see and take notice of the person in disguise, as well as every body else about the town.

The lady, feeling extremely confused, didn’t know how to act in this situation, as her urgency and impatience made it difficult for her to come up with a proper way to get the prince secretly to the house, especially at such an inconvenient hour as eleven o’clock in the evening. So, she called for Kingsborough, to whom she revealed the entire secret. Kingsborough, remaining completely composed, explained to her the dangers that both she and the prince would face if she insisted on having him brought to her house, where she was set to host one of the king’s officers that day, who would undoubtedly notice the disguised person, just like everyone else in town would.

Having got the lady at last to yield, though with great reluctancy, he ordered Neil to return to the prince, and to carry him to the back of a hill, a long mile from the house of Mungstot, and there to wait till he came to join them, and ordered that some light clothes should be packt in the form of a bundle, for the prince to carry on his back, as if it had been some of Miss Flora’s baggage, which done, they set out for the hill, but they had not gone far, when tiring of his burden, which he carried very awkwardly, threw it from him, leaving it for Neil to carry, or leave, as he should think fit. It was in vain that Neil insisted he would take it again, but he would never condescend, saying that he had carried it long enough.

Finally getting the lady to agree, though very reluctantly, he told Neil to go back to the prince and take him to the back of a hill, about a mile from Mungstot's house, and to wait there for him to join them. He also instructed that some light clothes be packed as a bundle for the prince to carry on his back, pretending it was part of Miss Flora’s luggage. Once that was done, they headed for the hill, but didn’t get far before the prince, tired of his awkward load, tossed it aside, leaving it for Neil to carry or abandon as he saw fit. Neil insisted he would take it back, but the prince refused, saying he had carried it long enough.

When they came to the place of meeting they sate down upon the side of a hillock, where they wait’d for Kingsborough. The prince, who was a long time silent and very pensive, ask’d Neil whether he had carried his case of knives from the boat; Neil, who did not miss them till then, answered he had not; ‘Then,’ said the prince, ‘you must return and look for them.’—‘Shall I for the sakes of all the knives in the universe leave you here all alone?’ reply’d Neil.—‘There will be no fears of me,’ said he, ‘do you what you are ordered, for I must absolutely have it, so no more words.’ Neil still opposed, but in vain; seeing him at last quite out of humour, and ready to fly in a passion, went leaving him there within a gun shot of the high rod, without a soul along with him.

When they arrived at the meeting place, they sat down on the side of a small hill, waiting for Kingsborough. The prince, who had been silent and deep in thought for a while, asked Neil if he had taken his knife case from the boat. Neil, realizing for the first time that he hadn’t, replied that he had not. “Then,” said the prince, “you have to go back and look for them.” “Am I supposed to leave you here all alone for the sake of some knives?” Neil replied. “I’ll be fine,” said the prince. “Just do as I say; I really need them, so no more talking.” Neil continued to resist, but it was no use; seeing the prince was now quite upset and about to lose his temper, he left him there within gunshot of the tall pole, completely alone.

When Neil returned he found Kingsborough with him taking a glass of wine, which Lady Margarate MacDonald had sent by Kingsborough, together with some few biscuits of which he ate a little, and gave the rest to Neil[Pg 265] to keep for him till another occasion. About an hour before sunset they set off for Kingsborough, where they were to be that night. Miss Flora, who staid for dinner at Mungstot, that she might not be suspected by Lieut. MacLeod, followed a horseback at some distance, and was mightily diverted to hear several of the country people with whom she fell in upon the road, as they returned from the meeting house at Mungstot, it being Sunday, make their remarks upon the behaviour of Betty Burk, her maid, which name the prince borrowed when he left the Isle of Wist.

When Neil got back, he found Kingsborough enjoying a glass of wine that Lady Margarate MacDonald had sent with him, along with a few biscuits, of which he ate a little and gave the rest to Neil[Pg 265] to save for him for another time. About an hour before sunset, they set off for Kingsborough, where they would be staying that night. Miss Flora, who stayed for dinner at Mungstot so she wouldn't raise suspicions with Lieutenant MacLeod, followed on horseback at a distance and was quite amused to overhear some locals she came across on the road, returning from the meeting house at Mungstot since it was Sunday, commenting on the behavior of Betty Burk, her maid, whose name the prince took when he left the Isle of Wist.

Neil, who walked a little behind the prince, and Kingsborough, hearing the subject the fellows were upon, went slower till they came up and joined him, but they, notwithstanding, continued to speak with the same freedom as before, of the impudence and assurance of Miss Burk, who was not ashamed to walk and keep company with Kingsborough, and was no less vexed than surprised how he took so much notice of her, when he never minded her mistress, who was so near at hand. Betty, very easie of what would be said of her, went on always at such a rate, that she very often got a piece before her fellow travellers, which gave occasion to some of the fellows to cry out, ‘Curse the wretch do you observe, sir (meaning Neil), what terrible steps she takes, how manly she walks, how carelessly she carries her dress,’ and a hundred such like expressions, which they repeated over and over again.

Neil, who was walking a bit behind the prince, and Kingsborough, hearing what the guys were talking about, slowed down until they caught up with him. Still, they continued to speak freely about the boldness and confidence of Miss Burk, who wasn’t embarrassed to walk and hang out with Kingsborough. They were just as annoyed as they were surprised by how much attention he paid to her, especially since he ignored her mistress, who was so close by. Betty, unconcerned about what others would say about her, kept up her pace, often getting ahead of her fellow travelers. This prompted some of the guys to shout, "Look at that wretch! Do you see, sir (meaning Neil), how she strides, how confidently she walks, how carelessly she carries her dress?" and they repeated similar comments over and over again.

But what they most took notice of all was, when Kingsborough and his companion was come to a rivulet about knee deep, which crossed the high rod, to see Burk take up her petty coats so high when she entred the water. The poor fellows were quite confounded at this last sight, which made them rail out against Burk, calling her all the names in the world, and ask’t of Neil if he was acquainted with her. Neil told them that he knew nothing about her further than to hear she was an Irish girl who met with Miss MacDonald in Wist, and uppon a report[Pg 266] of her being a famous spinister of lint, engaged her for her mother’s use.

But what caught their attention the most was when Kingsborough and his companion reached a knee-deep stream that crossed the path, and saw Burk lift her skirts high as she stepped into the water. The poor guys were utterly shocked by this sight, which led them to yell at Burk, hurling all sorts of insults and asking Neil if he knew her. Neil told them he didn’t know much about her, just that she was an Irish girl who ran into Miss MacDonald in Wist, and upon hearing that she was known for her exceptional linen, he had engaged her for his mother’s benefit.

The honest people soon after departed with Neil and Miss Flora, and made for their different homes full of astonish——

The honest people soon after left with Neil and Miss Flora and headed to their respective homes, full of astonishment——

[Manuscript ends abruptly.]

[Manuscript ends suddenly.]

[Pg 267]

[Pg 267]


[Pg 268]

[Pg 268]

A SHORT NARRATIVE OF THE CONDUCT OF LUDOVICK GRANT OF GRANT DURING THE REBELLION

Note.—Many of the letters enclosed by Ludovick Grant as appendixes to his narrative are printed in Sir William Fraser’s Chiefs of Grant. With a few exceptions these have not been reprinted here, but a reference is given to where they may be found in the second volume of the Chiefs of Grant, and a brief abstract is given of the more important letters. The letters referred to by Ludovick Grant which are not given by Sir William Fraser are here printed in full.

Note.—Many of the letters included by Ludovick Grant as appendices to his narrative are found in Sir William Fraser’s Chiefs of Grant. With a few exceptions, these haven't been reprinted here, but a reference is provided for where they can be found in the second volume of the Chiefs of Grant, along with a brief summary of the more significant letters. The letters mentioned by Ludovick Grant that aren't included by Sir William Fraser are printed in full here.


[Pg 269]

[Pg 269]

A SHORT NARRATIVE OF MR. GRANT’S CONDUCT DURING THE REBELLION

The first advice that Mr. Grant got that any invasion or insurrection was intended was by a letter from Mr. Craigie, at that time his Majesty’s Advocate,[511] of date 5th August 1745 (Appen. No. 1st),[512] which came to his hands at his House of Grange-Hill in the low Country of Murray on Saturday 10th, and next day he had an account, that the young Pretender with some forces had actually landed and heard various and different Reports of their numbers.

The first warning Mr. Grant received about any planned invasion or uprising was in a letter from Mr. Craigie, who was at that time his Majesty’s Advocate, dated August 5th, 1745 (Appen. No. 1st). He received it at his house in Grange-Hill, in the low country of Murray, on Saturday the 10th. The next day, he learned that the young Pretender had actually landed with some forces, and he heard several differing reports about their numbers.

Thereupon Sir James Grant and Mr. Grant went Monday the 12th to Castle Grant. Their country was all the time disarmed by authority of an Act of Parliament, nor durst they appear in arms otherwise than as Directed by the Statute, without Rendering themselves obnoxious to the Law, and att the Mercy of the proper officers, to whom the Execution of it was Committed. And they could not but observe, that his Majesty’s Advocate, however well satisfied he was of their zeal, yet makes no insinuation of their raising their Friends and Clan in arms: on the contrary says in Generall that at London they have no good opinion of this Country, and Desires no more of Mr. Grant, than to have a sharp look out, and send him Intelligence how matters go. For these Reasons Mr. Grant contented himself with calling together the Gentlemen in that country and causing enquire what arms could be found, should there be occasion for using them—

Then Sir James Grant and Mr. Grant went to Castle Grant on Monday, the 12th. Their region was continuously disarmed by the authority of an Act of Parliament, and they couldn’t show up armed unless it was approved by the Statute, or they would put themselves at risk of the Law and be at the mercy of the officials responsible for enforcing it. They noticed that the King’s Advocate, even though he was well aware of their commitment, didn’t suggest that they rally their Friends and Clan to arms; instead, he mentioned that in London people don’t have a good opinion of this Country and only wants Mr. Grant to keep a close watch and inform him about how things are going. For these reasons, Mr. Grant decided to gather the Gentlemen in the area to see what arms were available in case they were needed.

[Pg 270]

[Pg 270]

And he was the more confirmed in this opinion by advices he had that Lord President was returned to Culloden and had had Interviews with Severalls of his Friends, Chiefs and other Clans, yet he sent no message, nor made any insinuation to Mr. Grant that it was proper for him to appear in arms.

And he felt even more certain about this opinion after hearing that the Lord President had returned to Culloden and had met with several of his friends, chiefs, and other clans. Still, he didn’t send any messages or suggest to Mr. Grant that it would be appropriate for him to take up arms.

August 24th Mr. Grant Received another Letter from Lord Advocate, dated the 20th (App. No. 2)[513] in answer to one that Mr. Grant wrote the 15th with such Intelligence as he had then got of the Rebells. In that Letter he acquaints Mr. Grant that the Troops were in full march from Stirling which he hoped would be soon in Mr. Grant’s Neighbourhood; but he gives no authority nor advice to Mr. Grant to arm his Father’s clan unless that was intended by the Dark and ambiguous words that follow, viz. Which with the Assistance of His Majesty’s Friends it is hoped will restore quiet to the Country. But Mr. Grant was and still is persuaded that had such been my Lord Advocates meaning his Lordship who well knew the Law, and had reason to know in fact that the country was not half armed, would have expressed it in very different and plainer Terms.

August 24th Mr. Grant received another letter from Lord Advocate, dated the 20th (App. No. 2)[513] in response to one that Mr. Grant wrote on the 15th with the information he had about the rebels. In that letter, he informs Mr. Grant that the troops were in full march from Stirling and he hoped they would soon be in Mr. Grant’s area; however, he does not give Mr. Grant any authority or advice to arm his father’s clan unless that was implied in the vague and unclear words that follow, namely, which with the help of His Majesty’s friends it is hoped will restore peace to the country. But Mr. Grant was and still is convinced that if that had been my Lord Advocate's intention, he would have expressed it in much clearer and more straightforward terms.

Next Day after the Receipt of this letter Mr. Grant having got advice that Sir John Cope with the army under his Command were already past Tay Bridge[514] wrote to Sir John The Letter (App. No. 3),[515] which he sent by one of his[Pg 271] friends Robert Grant, now Ensign and Adjutant in Loudouns Regiment, whom he also Informed what number of arms were, according to the Reports made to Mr. Grant, found in the Country, and what number of men could be raised on short warning to the end that if Sir John should Demand any Assistance, that Gentleman might be able to inform him what he could expect.

The next day after receiving this letter, Mr. Grant learned that Sir John Cope and the army under his command had already crossed Tay Bridge.[514] He wrote to Sir John (Letter App. No. 3),[515] sending it with one of his friends, Robert Grant, who is currently an Ensign and Adjutant in Loudoun's Regiment. He also informed him about how many arms had been found in the area, according to reports made to Mr. Grant, and how many men could be gathered on short notice, so that if Sir John needed any assistance, this gentleman would be able to let him know what to expect.

This Gentleman instead of finding Sir John about Delnacardoch or to the southward of it, as Mr. Grant hoped he should, found him at Ruthven of Badenoch,[516] and Returned to Mr. Grant Monday the 26th at night without any other answer to his Letter than a verball message that Sir John thanked him for it. He further Informed Mr. Grant that Sir John, instead of going in quest of the Rebells, was marching to Inverness to avoid them and that next night he was to encamp in the head of Strathspey.

This gentleman, instead of finding Sir John near Delnacardoch or to the south of it, as Mr. Grant had hoped, found him at Ruthven of Badenoch.[516] He returned to Mr. Grant on Monday the 26th at night with no other response to his letter than a verbal message that Sir John thanked him for it. He also informed Mr. Grant that Sir John, rather than searching for the rebels, was heading to Inverness to steer clear of them and that he was set to camp at the head of Strathspey the following night.

About this time Mr. Grant had advice that the Person called Duke of Perth was in Braemar raising the Highlanders in that country, that the Mackintoshes and M‘Phersons were all in concert with the Rebells[517] that their[Pg 272] plan was that they, and even the Pretender and the Highlanders with him, were to march down through Strathspey, and join Perth, and march through Strathaven, Glenlivet, and into Aberdeenshire and so Southward before Sir John Cope, raising all the men in the Country through which they marched. This obliged Mr. Grant to set about raising his Friends as fast as possible for Defence of his own country, which upon Sir John’s marching to Inverness behoved to be quite naked and exposed to them, and Deprived him of the Honour of waiting on Sir John as he intended to have done, when he was encamped in the head of Strathspey; However as Sir John was quite a stranger to the country, and there were some Dangerous passes in it he sent three of the Gentlemen of the country to wait on him and with orders to raise 40 or 50 of the men nearest to these grounds to serve him as Guides and give him Intelligence and with them to patrole in the Neighbouring Hills, not only all Nights but till the Army was quite clear of these Passes, and out of any kind of Danger from the Rebells; While Mr. Grant at the same time was gathering his Friends and cantoning them in the proper passes, to prevent if possible the Rebells entering his country, they having the very next day or second day after Sir John past made a march with six or seven hundred men, that pointed as if that had been their Design.

Around this time, Mr. Grant received word that someone called the Duke of Perth was in Braemar rallying the Highlanders in that area, and that the Mackintoshes and M‘Phersons were all in agreement with the Rebels. Their plan was for them, along with the Pretender and the Highlanders, to march down through Strathspey, join Perth, and continue through Strathaven, Glenlivet, and into Aberdeenshire, then southward before Sir John Cope, gathering all the men in the areas through which they passed. This forced Mr. Grant to quickly gather his friends to defend his own territory, which, after Sir John’s march to Inverness, was left completely vulnerable to the rebels. He was deprived of the honor of accompanying Sir John as he had planned when he was camped at the head of Strathspey. However, since Sir John was unfamiliar with the area and there were some dangerous routes, he sent three gentlemen from the region to assist him, instructing them to gather 40 or 50 of the local men to serve as guides and provide intelligence. They were to patrol the surrounding hills all night until the army was safely through those passes and out of any danger from the rebels. Meanwhile, Mr. Grant was busy gathering his friends and placing them strategically in the appropriate passes to prevent the rebels from entering his territory, as they had marched with six or seven hundred men just a day or two after Sir John passed through, indicating that this was likely their plan.

Mr. Grant therefore could not help being greatly surprised with accounts he had a few days after from Lord Lyon[518] by his letter without date (App. No. 4),[519] ‘that Sir[Pg 273] John Cope complained that tho’ Mr. Grant in his letter wrote him, that he and his people were ready to join and assist him, yet by some fatall advice, he woud neither join him with one man, nor go near him, and that if he had been joined but with one hundred or two from each of the Highland Chiftains, that he was told by the ministry would join him, he would have done their Business; but instead of that not one man has joined him of which he has acquainted the Ministry.’

Mr. Grant was therefore very surprised by the news he received a few days later from Lord Lyon[518] in his undated letter (App. No. 4),[519] stating that Sir[Pg 273] John Cope complained that even though Mr. Grant wrote to him saying that he and his people were ready to join and assist him, due to some unfortunate advice, he wouldn’t send even one man to support him or get close to him. He mentioned that if he had gathered just one hundred or two from each of the Highland chiefs who he had been told would come to his aid, they would have succeeded. Instead, not a single person has joined him, which he has informed the Ministry.

Lord Lyon must undoubtedly have misunderstood Sir John. A Coppy of Mr. Grants Letter to him is subjoined (App. No. 3). He had no call nor the least Insinuation from Sir John to join him, nor did he know that the Ministry expected, or had authorised either him or any other Chiftain of a Clan to raise men in arms to join him.

Lord Lyon must have clearly misunderstood Sir John. A copy of Mr. Grant's letter to him is included (App. No. 3). He had no invitation or hint from Sir John to join him, nor did he know that the Ministry expected or had authorized him or any other clan chief to raise men in arms to support him.

But it seemed still more surprising that tho’ Sir John had not called for any assistance from Mr. Grant when he was on his march north, yet after the Army was at Inverness, and out of all Danger from the Rebells, Lord[Pg 274] Lyon still prest Mr. Grants marching his men to join Sir John at Inverness, and which advice was enforced by Major Grant,[520] Governour of Fort George, who came on purpose on that account to Castle Grant: But as the M‘Phersons and M‘Intoshes were then Rising and Glenbucket was in Strathaven and Glenlivet committing the Greatest outrages, even burning Houses to force out the Men, such a measure must, without doing the smallest service to the Government, have Involved his own Country of Strathspey in absolute ruin. Yet Mr. Grant agreed with Major Grant, that if Sir John was to march directly in quest of the Rebells, he would join him with all the men he could possibly raise, tho’ he could not agree to leave his own Country Exposed, to join Sir John if he was to march where there were no Rebells to be attacked.

But it was even more surprising that although Sir John hadn’t asked Mr. Grant for any help while he was heading north, once the Army was in Inverness and safe from the Rebels, Lord[Pg 274] Lyon still urged Mr. Grant to march his men to join Sir John in Inverness. This advice was supported by Major Grant, the Governor of Fort George, who came specifically to Castle Grant for that reason. However, since the M‘Phersons and M‘Intoshes were currently rising up and Glenbucket was in Strathaven along with Glenlivet committing significant atrocities—burning houses to force out the men—such a move would not only do little to help the Government but would also lead to the total destruction of his own region, Strathspey. Still, Mr. Grant agreed with Major Grant that if Sir John was to march directly to confront the Rebels, he would join him with as many men as he could possibly gather, even though he couldn’t agree to leave his own territory vulnerable to join Sir John if he was marching to a place without any Rebels to engage.

Upon the Intelligence that Mr. Grant had of Glenbucket levying men in Strathaven, and the outrages committed there, particularly a letter from his sister Mrs. Grant of Ballindalloch, dated September 5 (App. No. 5),[521] He sent about two or three hundred men to Strathaven and upon their approach Glenbucket retired from that country whereof Mr. Grant acquainted Sir John Cope, then on his way to Aberdeen by a letter about the 10th September (App. No. 6).[522]

Upon learning that Mr. Grant had information about Glenbucket recruiting men in Strathaven and the violence happening there, especially after receiving a letter from his sister Mrs. Grant of Ballindalloch, dated September 5 (App. No. 5),[521] he sent about two or three hundred men to Strathaven. When they approached, Glenbucket retreated from that area, which Mr. Grant informed Sir John Cope of in a letter around September 10 (App. No. 6).[522]

Mr. Grant got a Message from Lord President, Sept. 14th, Desiring an Interview, and as neither of them in the then situation of the Country could be absent a night from his own House, Mr. Grant met him Monday 17th at a place apointed, when the Lord President acquainted him, that he the Lord President was impowered by the[Pg 275] Government to raise some Company’s, That therefore he made offer of the first of them to him, and that he Mr. Grant should have the naming of all the Oficiers of that Company. Mr. Grant answered, that since he the Lord President proposed it, he would take the Company but could not name the Officers till he returned home, least by naming some, he might Disoblige others, but at the same time, gave his opinion that the raising some Companys would not do the service, and that it would be necessary to raise the whole of the Clans, that were Friends to the Government.

Mr. Grant received a message from the Lord President on September 14th, asking for a meeting. Since neither of them could be away from home for a night given the country’s situation, Mr. Grant met him on Monday, the 17th, at a designated location. The Lord President informed him that he had the authority from the Government to raise some companies. Therefore, he offered the first one to Mr. Grant, who would have the power to name all the officers of that company. Mr. Grant responded that since the Lord President was proposing it, he would accept the company, but he couldn't name the officers until he returned home, to avoid upsetting anyone by choosing some over others. At the same time, he expressed his view that raising just a few companies wouldn’t be effective and that it was necessary to gather all the clans that supported the Government.

Upon Mr. Grants return to his own House, He and all the Gentlemen in the Country had got Information that the Lord President got the Disposall of Twenty Companys, he found them greatly Disobliged that only one of them was to be given to their Clan, which they thought very far short of the proportion they bore to the other Northern Clans, that were the avowed and constant Friends of his Majestys Government, and looked on it as a slight intended to them and that either it was intended, that no more of them but that company should be employed in the service, or if they were that it must be att their own expense while the other Favourite Clanns were to be payed by the Government. And for these Reasons Mr. Grant found greater Difficulty in naming the officers than he could foresee before he knew the number of the Companys to be raised. That if the measure of raising Companys were still insisted on that Mr. Grant rather than hurt the service would accept of four or even of three of them; But a smaller number would not employ the principal Gentlemen of the Clan nor satisfy any of them where so many companys were to be Disposed of.

Upon Mr. Grant's return to his home, he and all the gentlemen in the area learned that the Lord President had control over twenty companies. They were quite upset to discover that only one company would be assigned to their clan, which they felt was far too little compared to the other Northern clans, who were known and consistent supporters of the King’s government. They viewed this as a slight against them, believing it meant that either only that one company would be used for their service, or if more were used, they would have to cover the costs themselves, while the other favored clans would be funded by the government. Because of this, Mr. Grant found it more challenging to appoint officers than he had anticipated before knowing the number of companies to be raised. If the plan to raise companies continued, Mr. Grant would prefer to accept four or even three of them rather than jeopardize the service, but any fewer would not engage the leading gentlemen of the clan or satisfy anyone, considering so many companies were available.

Lord Deskfoord[523] was therefore prevailed with to go to Culloden to explain these things to Lord President and at[Pg 276] the same time to assure him, that the whole Clan should on all occasions be ready to act in the Governments service, only that it would be necessary to give them pay during the Time that they should be employed, because Mr. Grant’s private Fortune could not bear so great an expence.

Lord Deskfoord[523] was therefore convinced to go to Culloden to explain these matters to the Lord President and at[Pg 276] the same time assure him that the entire Clan would be ready to act in the government's service whenever needed, but it would be necessary to provide them with pay while they were employed, as Mr. Grant’s personal finances couldn’t handle such a large expense.

Lord Deskfoord at his return reported the Lord President’s answer, That he was trusted with the Disposal of Twenty Companys, yet at the same time all possible economy was enjoined, That he could not therefore at first exceed one Company to any one Clan, That he knew the value and Importance in that country of the Family of Grant, and had for that reason offered the first to Mr. Grant, and should he refuse it others might follow his Example, and thereby the whole sceme miscarry. And whether it was the best measure that might have been proposed yet it being the only one that the Government had yet proposed for employing their friends in the north, a miscarriage might be of bade consequence. That he therefore hoped that where so much was at stake Mr. Grant would come over small Difficultys, and if in the future Distribution of these Companys due regard was not had to the Family of Grant That Mr. Grant would have reason to Complain.

Lord Deskfoord, upon his return, reported the Lord President’s response: he was entrusted with the allocation of twenty companies, but at the same time, he was instructed to exercise as much economy as possible. Therefore, he couldn't initially assign more than one company to any single clan. He recognized the value and importance of the Grant family in that region and had offered the first company to Mr. Grant. If he turned it down, others might follow suit, which could cause the entire plan to fail. While it may not have been the best strategy proposed, it was the only one the government had offered for utilizing their allies in the north, and a failure could have serious consequences. He hoped that given what was at stake, Mr. Grant would overlook minor difficulties, and if future allocations of these companies did not take the Grant family into account, Mr. Grant would have valid reasons to complain.

Upon Consideration of this answer Mr. Grant satisfied his Friends, and with their approbation accepted of the Company offered, whereof he acquainted Lord President by his letter September 22d (App. No. 7),[524] and therein named the officers. And Lord President by his answer, Sept 24th, (App. No. 8),[525] Confirmed what Lord Deskfoord had reported of the Communing Between them, Approved the nomination Mr. Grant had made of Officers, and desired that the men might be ready at a call, because he Daily expected arms and money.

After considering this response, Mr. Grant reassured his friends and, with their approval, accepted the company that was offered to him. He informed the Lord President in a letter dated September 22nd (App. No. 7),[524] and mentioned the appointed officers. The Lord President replied on September 24th (App. No. 8),[525] confirming what Lord Deskfoord said about their discussions, approving Mr. Grant's officer nominations, and requested that the men be on standby, as he anticipated arms and money daily.

September 28th Lord President wrote to Mr. Grant,[Pg 277] (App. No. 9),[526] the Different accounts he had got of the Battle of Preston, and after Expressing his apprehension of the effects it might have in that country ‘Suggests That Mr. Grant should have all his people Alert that they might be able to do such service as the exegence might require, which would help to cause their Neighbours Consider.’

September 28th The Lord President wrote to Mr. Grant,[Pg 277] (App. No. 9),[526] sharing the various reports he had received about the Battle of Preston. After expressing his concern about the potential consequences in that area, he suggested that Mr. Grant should keep all his people on alert so they could assist as needed, which would help their neighbors to think things through.

This was the first letter that Mr. Grant received from any Person intrusted by the Government that Directly proposed the raising his Men, other than the Company already mentioned and having received advices about the same time that the Farquharsons in Aberdeenshire were rising, and that the M‘Phersons were to march through Strathspey to join them, he furthwith rised all the men that he could Find any Kind of Arms for, and got together about seven hundred. The M‘Phersons did accordingly about two days after march near the Borders between Badenoch and Strathspey; but upon Mr. Grants marching up to meet them, they retired to Ruthven, and from thence to Cluny M‘Phersons house. But Mr. Grant having got Intelligence, that the M‘Intoshes were in Motion, he keeped his Men together for eight Days ’till he had certain notice that they had not moved.[527]

This was the first letter that Mr. Grant received from anyone authorized by the Government that directly suggested raising his men, apart from the Company already mentioned. At about the same time, he learned that the Farquharsons in Aberdeenshire were mobilizing and that the M‘Phersons were set to march through Strathspey to join them. He quickly gathered all the men he could find who had any kind of arms and assembled around seven hundred. The M‘Phersons did indeed march near the border between Badenoch and Strathspey about two days later; however, when Mr. Grant moved to meet them, they retreated to Ruthven and then to Cluny M‘Pherson's house. But Mr. Grant, having received intelligence that the M‘Intoshes were on the move, kept his men together for eight days until he had definite confirmation that they had not advanced.

Mr. Grant had sent him by his Baillie in Urquhart Twelve miles benorth Inverness a Letter to the Baillie from Angus M‘Donald son to Glengarry,[528] Dated September the 30th, ordering the Tenants in that Country to Join his Standart (as he called it) and threatening in case of Disobedience to burn the Country, and was afterwards advised by the Baillie by a letter of October 8th that he had been prevented by the said Angus M‘Donald from Marching into Strathspey as Mr. Grant had ordered him with such of the Tenants as were willing to follow him, and that the Country would be ruined in ten Days. These[Pg 278] Letters Mr. Grant answered October 6th and 10th, exhorting them to continue stadefast to the Government, ordering the Baillie to bring the Men to Strathspey, and engaging[Pg 279] himself to repair all the Damage the Rebells should do them if they complyed with his order (App. No. 10, 11, 12, 13).[529]

Mr. Grant had sent a letter to the Baillie from Angus M‘Donald, the son of Glengarry, through his Baillie in Urquhart, located twelve miles north of Inverness. The letter, dated September 30th, ordered the tenants in that area to rally to his standard (as he called it) and threatened to burn the land if they disobeyed. Later, the Baillie informed Mr. Grant in a letter dated October 8th that Angus M‘Donald had stopped him from marching into Strathspey with the tenants who were willing to join him, and that the area would be ruined in ten days. Mr. Grant responded to these letters on October 6th and 10th, urging them to remain loyal to the government, instructing the Baillie to gather the men for Strathspey, and promising to cover any damage the rebels might cause if they followed his orders (App. No. 10, 11, 12, 13).

[Pg 280]

[Pg 280]

Mr. Grant received a Letter from Lord Loudoun, October 11th (App. No. 14th),[530] acquainting him of his arival to command the Troops with one from Lord President, October 12th, Desiring him to bring the Company together, and to have them ready to march at a Call, and as many men as Mr. Grant could arm to have them ready on any Exigency if they were called out and adds ‘Ways and Means shall be fallen on to subsist them’ (App. No. 15),[531] and October 16th (App. No. 16),[532] Mr. Grant assures Lord Loudoun that he would exert himself to do everything in his power for his Majestys service under his Lordships Direction and Advice, acquaints him of his having sent a party to Banffshire to stop levying cess for the Pretender[Pg 281] (which effectually did at that time), and gives him notice that the Company was ready at a Call.

Mr. Grant received a letter from Lord Loudoun on October 11th (App. No. 14th),[530] informing him of his arrival to command the troops, along with another from the Lord President on October 12th, asking him to gather the company and keep them ready to march at a moment’s notice, and to have as many men as Mr. Grant could equip prepared for any urgent situation if they were called upon, and added, 'Ways and Means shall be found to support them' (App. No. 15),[531] and on October 16th (App. No. 16),[532] Mr. Grant assured Lord Loudoun that he would do everything in his power for His Majesty’s service under his Lordship’s direction and advice, informed him that he had sent a group to Banffshire to stop the collection of cess for the Pretender[Pg 281] (which effectively did at that time), and notified him that the company was ready at a moment’s notice.

October 22d and 23d Mr. Grant received from John Grant his Chamberlain or Steward in Urquhart Two letters, Dated 21st and 22d October (App. No. 17 and 18),[533][Pg 282] Aquainting him that Glengarry’s son, M‘Donald of Barrisdale, Glenmoriston and the Master of Lovat, were come to force out his Tenents in Urquhart, and threatned to carrie away their whole Cattle, if they did not Join. That upon the Chamberlains assuring them, that Mr. Grant would make good all their Damages The Tenants absolutely refused to Join and resolved to oppose the M‘Donalds, should they attempt to carry off their Cattle, tho they were not able to resist both them and the Frasers, and aquainting him also of a Dispute between the Master of Lovat and Barrisdale which of them had the best title to these Tenents. The Master insisting that he had the best right to them except such of them as were of the name of M‘Donald whom he willingly yielded to Barrisdale, and that this Dispute had superseded the execution of their Threatnings Till it should be decided by Lord Lovat.

On October 22nd and 23rd, Mr. Grant received two letters from John Grant, his Chamberlain or Steward in Urquhart, dated October 21st and 22nd (App. No. 17 and 18),[533][Pg 282] informing him that Glengarry’s son, M‘Donald of Barrisdale, Glenmoriston, and the Master of Lovat had come to force out his tenants in Urquhart and threatened to take away all their cattle if they didn’t join them. The Chamberlain assured the tenants that Mr. Grant would cover all their damages, but they flatly refused to join and decided to stand up to the M‘Donalds if they tried to take their cattle, even though they couldn't resist both them and the Frasers. The letters also mentioned a dispute between the Master of Lovat and Barrisdale over who had the better claim to the tenants. The Master insisted he had the superior right to them, except for those of the name M‘Donald, which he willingly conceded to Barrisdale, and noted that this dispute had put a hold on the execution of their threats until it could be resolved by Lord Lovat.

That Mr. Grant looked upon this as of the utmost immportance to the Government, that the King’s Faithfull subjects who were Determined even at the hazard of their lives and the whole of their little Fortunes to persevere in their Loyalty, should not suffer to be Dragged against their wills into the Rebellion and that too within Twelve miles of Inverness. He was at the same time aware, That Lord Loudoun who had then got no more than one of the new Companys the Monroes, not having yet called for the Grants, had not a force sufficient to leave Inverness, and to march against such Numbers as might be brought to oppose him, and as Urquhart is Distant about fourty miles from Castle Grant, There was no time to Deliberate, or to receive Lord Loudon’s Directions. Mr. Grant therefore forthwith assembled his friends to the number of betwixt six and seven Hundred tho many of them were ill armed, and Marched for Inverness in his way to Urquhart having[Pg 283] Recommended to Lord Deskfoord to give notice of his March and the Design of it by Express to the Earl of Loudoun and Lord President, and to begg that Lord Loudoun would order Quarters to be provided for the men at Inverness. But upon Saturday the 26th James Grant of Dell one of the Tenants in Urquhart met Mr. Grant upon his march with Accounts that the Rebells had Left Urquhart, and marched Northward to the country of Assint, and Mr. Grant thought himself Lucky that they had done so; for about the same Time The answer to Lord Deskfoords Letter signed by both Lord Loudoun and Lord President Dated October 26th (App. No. 19)[534] was brought him by Express ‘Wishing that Mr. Grant had Communicated to them his Design, before he set out with such numbers, which might have the effect to begin Horseplay before they were sufficiently prepared.’ And upon Receipt of this Letter Mr. Grant Dismissed his men except about 100 that he constantly Keept partly about his House and partly in some proper passes or Inlets to his Country.

That Mr. Grant viewed this as extremely important for the Government, that the King's loyal subjects who were determined even at the risk of their lives and all their small fortunes to stay loyal should not be forced against their will into the Rebellion, especially so close to Inverness. He was also aware that Lord Loudoun, who had only recruited one of the new Companies, the Monroes, and had not yet called for the Grants, did not have enough troops to leave Inverness and march against the numbers that could be raised to fight him. Since Urquhart is about forty miles from Castle Grant, there was no time for deliberation or to wait for Lord Loudoun's orders. Therefore, Mr. Grant quickly gathered his friends, totaling between six and seven hundred, though many were poorly armed, and marched toward Inverness on his way to Urquhart. He had[Pg 283] recommended to Lord Deskfoord to inform Lord Loudoun and the Lord President about his march and its purpose by Express and requested that Lord Loudoun arrange for accommodations for the men in Inverness. However, on Saturday the 26th, James Grant of Dell, one of the tenants in Urquhart, met Mr. Grant on his way with news that the Rebels had left Urquhart and marched northward to the country of Assint. Mr. Grant considered himself fortunate that they had done so; around the same time, he received a reply to Lord Deskfoord's letter, signed by both Lord Loudoun and the Lord President, dated October 26th (App. No. 19)[534], via Express, stating that they wished Mr. Grant had communicated his plans with them before setting out with such a large number, as this could lead to starting a conflict before they were adequately prepared. Upon receiving this letter, Mr. Grant dismissed most of his men, keeping only about 100 around his house and in strategic locations throughout his territory.

November 3d Mr. Grant got a Letter from Lord Lewis Gordon in the Pretender’s name (App. No. 20),[535] Desiring[Pg 284] Mr. Grants allowance at least his connivance to raise men. Mr. Grant would not see the Messenger and ordered such a verbal answer to be given him as his Message Deserved, but being at the same Time Informed of Lord Lewis’s practices in Strathavin and of his Designs on Kincardine,[536] an Estate upon Speyside belonging to the Duke of Gordon, Mr. Grant raised about 200 men more and marched them to Abernethy lying betwixt Strathaven and Kincardine, and thereby not only prevented Lord Lewis from forcing out any men in Kincardine, but also obliged him to retreat from Strathavin, and give over for that time his recruiting there.

On November 3rd, Mr. Grant received a letter from Lord Lewis Gordon on behalf of the Pretender (App. No. 20),[535] asking for Mr. Grant’s support, or at least his tolerance, in raising men. Mr. Grant refused to see the messenger and instructed that a verbal response be given to him that matched the nature of the message. At the same time, he learned about Lord Lewis’s activities in Strathaven and his plans for Kincardine,[536] an estate in Speyside owned by the Duke of Gordon. As a result, Mr. Grant gathered about 200 more men and marched them to Abernethy, situated between Strathaven and Kincardine. This move not only prevented Lord Lewis from recruiting in Kincardine but also forced him to retreat from Strathaven and abandon his recruiting efforts there for the time being.

November 7th Mr. Grant Received a Letter from Lord Loudoun, Dated Nov. 5 (App. No. 21),[537] commending the Company of Grants that had been sent to him, and if Mr. Grant should need any assistance against Lord Lewis Gordon, promising all he could give him and at the same time got a letter from the President of the same Date, (App. No. 22),[538] and to the same effect. And in this Letter he for the first time made an offer to Mr. Grant of another Company and desired him to name the officers.

November 7th, Mr. Grant received a letter from Lord Loudoun, dated November 5 (App. No. 21), [537] praising the Company of Grants that had been sent to him, and if Mr. Grant needed any help against Lord Lewis Gordon, he promised all the support he could offer. At the same time, he received a letter from the President, also dated the same day (App. No. 22), [538] with a similar message. In this letter, he made Mr. Grant an offer for another Company for the first time and asked him to name the officers.

By this Time the Gentlemen in Strathspey heard it Reported that the Laird of M‘Leod was to have no less than four companys, and began to complain that Mr. Grant had accepted of even one Company; Therefore[Pg 285] instead of giving an answer in writing Mr. Grant chose to go to Inverness about November 10th and found that about 400 M‘Leods were already come to the neighbourhood of Inverness tho’ it was then said that 200 were to be employed and the rest to return Home.

By this time, the gentlemen in Strathspey heard reports that the Laird of M‘Leod was going to have at least four companies, and they started complaining that Mr. Grant had even accepted one company. Therefore, instead of responding in writing, Mr. Grant decided to go to Inverness around November 10th. He found that about 400 M‘Leods had already arrived in the Inverness area, although it was said that 200 were meant to be employed and the rest were to go home.[Pg 285]

Mr. Grant told Lord Loudoun and Lord President, that all his Friends were in perfect good Humour, and readie to venture their Lives and Fortunes in the service, and that it was of the outmost consequence to him to preserve that good spirit among them. That he found great Danger of Creating Jealousys and Animositys among them by raising the first Company, tho’ there would have been no Danger nor Difficulty in raising four or five. But as the Country was now in Great Ferment the Danger of Disobligeing many Gentlemen of his name would now be much greater should he accept of another Company, and thereby have the naming of the officers and no more. However upon their continuing to urge it Mr. Grant agreed to take it to consideration till he should return to Strathspey, and converse with the Gentlemen of the Country about it.

Mr. Grant told Lord Loudoun and Lord President that all his friends were in great spirits and ready to risk their lives and fortunes for the cause. He emphasized how crucial it was for him to maintain that positive attitude among them. He recognized a significant risk of creating jealousy and conflict by forming the first company, even though starting four or five wouldn't have posed any issues. However, given the current unrest in the country, he felt the risk of upsetting many gentlemen of his standing would be much higher if he accepted another company, gaining the authority to name the officers without any additional benefit. Nevertheless, after they continued to press him, Mr. Grant agreed to think it over until he returned to Strathspey and could discuss it with the local gentlemen.

After Returning to Strathspey the Gentlemen had got certain accounts that M‘Leod had got four Companys, besides another to be given to his cousin M‘Leod of Genzies, and therefore cou’d not be persuaded to agree to Mr. Grants accepting of only one which they thought a very partial Distribution, and Mr. Grant by his Letter 29th November, whereof (vide the Coppy App. No. 23d),[539] aquainting the Lord Loudoun of their Resolutions; ‘but at the same time asured his Lordship that the whole body of the clan should be ready upon a few days notice to go upon any Duty under his Lordships eye or Command, that his Lordship should think for his Majesty’s service.’

After returning to Strathspey, the gentlemen learned that M'Leod had secured four companies, along with another one intended for his cousin M'Leod of Genzies. They couldn't convince him to agree to Mr. Grant taking only one, which they believed was an unfair distribution. In Mr. Grant's letter dated November 29th, which you can see in the copy (App. No. 23d), he informed Lord Loudoun of their decisions; he assured his Lordship that the entire clan would be prepared, with just a few days' notice, to undertake any duty under his Lordship's supervision or command that he thought was necessary for the King's service.

In the same letter Mr. Grant after aquainting Lord Loudoun of the Great outrages the Rebells were committing in the shires of Banff and Aberdeen and noticing of what Importance it would be to relieve these Countys, and especially the Town of Aberdeen, from so grievous[Pg 286] oppression, beggs to have his Lordships commands and promises in five Days after Receiving his Lordships Orders to march with five or Six Hundred men to Aberdeen to restore the peace of those parts. Mr. Grant now felt the disadvantage of having accepted even of one Company; the want of 100 good men and of 100 broadswords and Pistols that he had at Lord Loudouns desire furnished them must have been a considerable loss in such an Expedition, however he thought himself strong enough without them for any body of the Rebells that he heard was in Aberdeenshire but as he could not forsee whether they might not be reinforced from Perth, therefore in that letter he also suggests that in case of any Reinforcements being sent from Perth to Aberdeen, it might be proper to send Captain Grants Company to his assistance, and hoped that in his absence Lord Loudoun would Protect his Country.

In the same letter, Mr. Grant informed Lord Loudoun about the serious outrages the rebels were causing in the counties of Banff and Aberdeen. He pointed out how important it would be to relieve these areas, especially the town of Aberdeen, from such severe oppression. He requested his Lordship's orders and promised that within five days of receiving them, he would march with five or six hundred men to Aberdeen to restore peace in those regions. Mr. Grant now felt the disadvantage of having accepted even one company; the lack of 100 good men and the 100 broadswords and pistols he had provided at Lord Loudoun's request must have been a significant loss for such an expedition. However, he believed he was still strong enough to handle any group of rebels he heard was in Aberdeenshire. Since he couldn't foresee whether they might be reinforced from Perth, he also suggested in that letter that if any reinforcements were sent from Perth to Aberdeen, it would be wise to send Captain Grant's company to assist him. He hoped that during his absence, Lord Loudoun would protect his country.

Lord Loudoun however did not think proper to give Mr. Grant these orders (and very likely he Judged better than Mr. Grant) for by his answer, December 2d (App. No. 24),[540] he aquaints Mr. Grant of an Expedition he was going upon, which would take him a few days. After which he proposed to march along the Coast for the Relief of that country, where, if it should prove necessary, he would expect and begg Mr. Grant’s assistance.

Lord Loudoun, however, decided not to give Mr. Grant these orders (and he probably judged better than Mr. Grant) because in his response on December 2nd (App. No. 24),[540] he informed Mr. Grant about an expedition he was going on that would take him a few days. After that, he suggested marching along the coast to help that region, where, if necessary, he would expect and ask for Mr. Grant’s assistance.

Earl of Findlater and Mr. Grant had repeated advices from Banffshire, particularly from the Earl of Findlaters Chamberlain and Mr. Grant of Auchynanie[541] of the oppressive demands made on the people of that country of men and Money, and Military Execution threatned, in case of Refusal and that December 10th was fixed for commencing such military Execution att Keith. Lord Findlater had thereupon, December 9th, wrote to Lord Loudoun and in his absence to Lord President begging relief and Mr.[Pg 287] Grant had given assurance to Auchynanie of Assistance how soon such violences should be begun, and December 11th at night he had a letter from Auchynanie of that days date, that they were already begun, and Lord Findater had one from his Chamberlain[542] much to the same purpose (vid. App. No. 25, 26, 27).[543] No Return was come from Lord Loudoun or the President, and there was[Pg 288] ground from their former Letters to presume, that Lord Loudoun was then upon another Expedition, and immediate relief seemed to be absolutely necessary. Mr. Grant thought therefore that he might be justly blamed by the Government as well as by his Friends in that Country should he stay tamely at home, waiting for orders from Lord Loudoun, and suffer them in the meantime to be ruined. Therefore he brought together 5 or 600 men and with them marched, December 12th, from Castle Grant, whereof he then acquainted Lord Loudoun by Express (App. No. 28th),[544] ‘That he proposed to be next night at Keith and endeavour to come up with Lord Lewis Gordons party, wherever they were, and that he would continue in that country with a force sufficient to keep the peace until he should receive his Lordships further Directions.’

The Earl of Findlater and Mr. Grant received repeated reports from Banffshire, especially from the Earl of Findlater's Chamberlain and Mr. Grant of Auchynanie, about the harsh demands being placed on the people of that area for men, money, and military action threatened if they refused. December 10th was set to begin such military action at Keith. In response, on December 9th, Lord Findlater wrote to Lord Loudoun and, in his absence, to Lord President, asking for help. Mr. Grant assured Auchynanie he would provide assistance as soon as these violent actions started. On the night of December 11th, he received a letter from Auchynanie, dated that day, stating that the actions had already begun. Lord Findlater received a similar letter from his Chamberlain (see App. No. 25, 26, 27). There was no response from Lord Loudoun or the President, and from their previous letters, it was assumed that Lord Loudoun was on another mission, making immediate help absolutely necessary. Mr. Grant felt that he would be justifiably criticized by the government as well as by his friends in that region if he remained inactive, waiting for orders from Lord Loudoun while they suffered. Therefore, he gathered 500 or 600 men and marched from Castle Grant on December 12th, informing Lord Loudoun via Express (App. No. 28) that he planned to arrive at Keith the next night and would try to catch up with Lord Lewis Gordon's party, wherever they were, and that he would stay in the area with enough force to maintain peace until he received further instructions from his Lordship.

The weather was so excessive bad and rainy that Mr. Grant by Mid Day of Saturday, the 14th, had got no further than Auflunkart within four miles of Keith, where he got Intelligence that upon notice of his March the Rebells had left Keith and gone to Fochabers. Mr. Grant therefore halted there that day to refresh his men and clean their arms, and there he received a Letter from Lord Findlater of December 13th (App. No. 29),[545] covering[Pg 289] Lord Presidents answer to his Lordship, Dated December 11th (App. No. 30),[546] which came to Castle Grant only the 13th. In that Letter he Informs Lord Findlater that on the 10th five or six hundred men had marched from Inverness towards Aberdeen by Elgin for the Relief of these Countys. That they were quickly to be followed by Lord Loudoun with as many more if needfull, and by a further force if it shall be wanted.

The weather was so incredibly bad and rainy that by midday on Saturday, the 14th, Mr. Grant hadn't gotten further than Auflunkart, which is about four miles from Keith. There, he learned that upon noticing his movement, the rebels had left Keith and headed to Fochabers. Mr. Grant decided to stay there that day to rest his men and clean their weapons. While there, he received a letter from Lord Findlater dated December 13th (App. No. 29),[545] which included[Pg 289] the Lord President's response to his Lordship, dated December 11th (App. No. 30),[546] which had reached Castle Grant only on the 13th. In that letter, he informs Lord Findlater that on the 10th, five or six hundred men had marched from Inverness towards Aberdeen via Elgin to assist these counties. They were soon to be followed by Lord Loudoun with as many more if necessary, and by additional forces if needed.

At the same time he had some accounts that Lord Loudoun was come to Murray, and that the Rebells had brought the boats on Spey to the East or Fochabers side of the River; Wherefore Mr. Grant sent a party of an hundred men who secured the boat of Bridge[547] which is[Pg 290] two miles further up the River and by Express aquainted Sir Harry Innes[548] at Elgin of what he had done, and Desired him to ask whether Lord Loudoun had any Commands for him, and that night he cantoned his men at Auflunkart Mulbain and adjacent villages.

At the same time, he received reports that Lord Loudoun had come to Murray and that the Rebels had brought the boats onto the Spey river on the east or Fochabers side. So, Mr. Grant sent a group of a hundred men to secure the boat at Bridge[547], which is[Pg 290] two miles further up the river. He immediately informed Sir Harry Innes[548] in Elgin about what he had done and asked if Lord Loudoun had any orders for him. That night, he stationed his men at Auflunkart Mulbain and the nearby villages.

Next morning Sir Harrie Innes came to him with a Letter from M‘Leod (App. No. 31),[549] Expressing ‘his joy at the news of the Grants being there, and aquainting him that he was at Elgin to attempt to pass Spey to assist in Protecting that country. That he heard the passage was to be Disputed, and that the Rebells had gathered all the boats at Bogg[550] to the East side, and that he was perswaded that Mr. Grants moving that way would Disperse them, and open that passage, which otherwise might be hazardous.’ (Vide Mr. Grants answer, App. No. 32.)[551]

Next morning, Sir Harrie Innes came to him with a letter from M‘Leod (App. No. 31), expressing his joy at the news that the Grants were there and informing him that he was in Elgin to try to cross the Spey to help protect that area. He had heard that the crossing would be contested and that the rebels had gathered all the boats at Bogg[550] on the east side. He was convinced that Mr. Grants moving in that direction would scatter them and clear the passage, which might otherwise be risky. (See Mr. Grants' response, App. No. 32.)[551]

Upon Receipt of this letter Mr. Grant marched towards Fochabers, but when he came within Two Miles of it, accounts were brought him, that on his approach the Rebells retired from it through the Enzie. Mr. Grant apprehending that they might have gone to Cullen, and taken Possession of Lord Findlaters House Detached a Party thither who took possession of it and the Town and prevented a party of the Rebells that had been sent thither for that purpose, and sent some gentlemen to wait of M‘Leod who passed the River without any opposition, and Mr. Grant again that night billetted his men, much in the same place they were the night before.

Upon receiving this letter, Mr. Grant marched toward Fochabers, but when he got within two miles of it, he received reports that the rebels had retreated through the Enzie as he approached. Mr. Grant suspected they might have gone to Cullen and taken possession of Lord Findlater's house, so he sent a party there who took control of it and the town, preventing a group of rebels that had been sent for that purpose from gaining access. He also sent some gentlemen to wait for M‘Leod, who crossed the river without any resistance, and that night Mr. Grant billeted his men in much the same location as they had the night before.

[Pg 291]

[Pg 291]

The Gentlemen sent to M‘Leod Brought Mr. Grant word, that he was to remain that night at Fochabers, and to march the next day the 16th to Cullen, wherefore Mr. Grant marched next day to Keith, and after Quartering his men and placing advance Guards some miles further towards Strathboggie, where he heard the main body of the Rebells was, he went himself to Cullen to assist the Deputy Sheriffs in accomodating M‘Leod and his men. For which purpose Mr. Grant had got a Commission of Sheriff Depute from Lord Findlater, and on the 17th returned back to Keith.

The gentlemen sent word to Mr. Grant that he was to stay the night in Fochabers and then march to Cullen the next day, the 16th. So, Mr. Grant marched to Keith the following day, set up his men, and placed advance guards a few miles further toward Strathboggie, where he had heard the main group of rebels was located. He then went to Cullen to help the Deputy Sheriffs accommodate M‘Leod and his men. For this purpose, Mr. Grant had received a Commission of Sheriff Depute from Lord Findlater, and he returned to Keith on the 17th.

Mr. Grant aquainted M‘Leod of the Letter he had wrote to Lord Loudoun, and of his purpose to remain at Keith till further orders; but M‘Leod was very earnest with him to go forward, and was of opinion that he would receive orders to do so.

Mr. Grant informed M‘Leod about the letter he had written to Lord Loudoun and his intention to stay at Keith until he received further instructions; however, M‘Leod was quite insistent that he should move forward and believed that he would get orders to do so.

Upon Mr. Grants Return to Keith a Messenger brought him a Letter from Lord Lewis Gordon with a printed Declaration by Lord John Drummond and a printed Letter signed Marshall (App. No. 33).[552] These papers joined[Pg 292] with what M‘Leod had said Determined Mr. Grant to go at least to Strathboggie, and therefore returned a verbal answer by the Messenger who brought the Letter, ‘That if Lord Lewis with his men would be at Strathbogie, next Day at 12 o’clock Mr. Grant and his men should there give them the answer, which he was Determined should be proclaimed over the Cross and affixed upon it.’ He immediately aquainted M‘Leod by Express of his[Pg 293] Design and that night got his answer (App. No. 34),[553] with a letter from Captain Monro of Culcairne from Fochabers.

Upon Mr. Grant's return to Keith, a messenger delivered a letter from Lord Lewis Gordon along with a printed declaration by Lord John Drummond and a printed letter signed by Marshall (App. No. 33).[552] These documents, along with what M‘Leod had said, convinced Mr. Grant to at least head to Strathbogie. He sent a verbal reply back with the messenger who brought the letter, saying that if Lord Lewis and his men would be at Strathbogie the next day at 12 o’clock, Mr. Grant and his men would provide them with an answer, which he intended to have proclaimed over the Cross and posted there. He immediately informed M‘Leod of his[Pg 293] plan and that night received his response (App. No. 34),[553] along with a letter from Captain Monro of Culcairne from Fochabers.

December 18th Mr. Grant marched to Strathboggie and upon his approach the Rebells fled, and there he made the Proclamation (App. No. 35)[554] and affixed it upon the most publick places and provided quarters for the Two Companys that Culcairn was bringing, fully Determined if he was not countermanded to proceed forward in Aberdeenshire as far as he could do any service to the Government, or give any assistance to M‘Leod, when on the 19th he received a letter from Lord Loudoun and another from[Pg 294] Lord Deskfoord, both dated at Inverness December 14th (App. No. 36, 37),[555][556] which pretty plainly apeared to Mr. Grant to be a Rebuke tho’ in very modest and polite terms for his undertaking that Expedition without orders and that Lord Loudoun, as he thought he had provided sufficiently for that service without Mr. Grant, he wished him rather to return than to proceed further, tho’ he wou’d give him no orders because he had given him none to go there. He therefore Resolved to return to Keith of which he aquainted Culcairne then at Strathboggie, as he did also[Pg 295] M‘Leod by express, vid. his Letter with M‘Leods answer—(App. No. 38, 39).[557][558]

December 18th, Mr. Grant marched to Strathboggie, and as he approached, the Rebels fled. There, he made the Proclamation (App. No. 35)[554] and posted it in the most public places. He also arranged quarters for the two companies that Culcairn was bringing, fully determined, unless countermanded, to proceed further into Aberdeenshire to provide any service to the Government or assistance to M‘Leod. On the 19th, he received letters from Lord Loudoun and Lord Deskfoord, both dated December 14th in Inverness (App. No. 36, 37),[555][556] which seemed to Mr. Grant like a rebuke, though in very modest and polite terms, for undertaking that expedition without orders. He believed Lord Loudoun felt he had enough provisions for that service without Mr. Grant and preferred him to return rather than go further, though he wouldn’t give him any orders because he hadn’t initially given him permission to be there. Mr. Grant then decided to return to Keith, and he informed Culcairn, who was at Strathboggie, and also notified M‘Leod by express, vid. his letter and M‘Leod's response—(App. No. 38, 39).[557][558]

Mr. Grant therefore Immediately returned to Strathspey but that as he apprehended that when M‘Leod was gone forward some small partys of the Rebells (whereof he had heard of severalls that could be formed in one Days time) might give Disturbance to the Country, he ventured even without orders to leave a party of 60 men at his house in Mulbain within Two miles of Fochabers, of which however he acquainted Lord Loudoun after his return to Castle Grant by a Letter, December 24th (App. No. 40),[559] wherein he renewed his offer of Employing his whole Clan, wherever Lord Loudoun should think they could be of any service to the Government, and that small party happened afterwards to be of good use after the Unlucky Disaster that happened to M‘Leods party at Inverury by securing the boats upon Spey to make good their Retreat. December 25th Mr. Grant received a letter from Sir Harrie Innes dated 24th December (App. No. 41),[560] with an Account of the Disaster at Inverury,[561] and that M‘Leod was come to Elgin and by his orders Desiring[Pg 296] Mr. Grant to have his men ready to oppose Lord Lewis Gordon, and at least to secure the boats upon Spey, and Sir Harry presses Mr. Grant to march his men the length of Rothes to the Protection of Murray, and December 29th he received Two letters one from the Magistrates of Elgin and another from Sir Harrie Innes, Dated December 28th, aquainting him that M‘Leod had marched to Forres and that by their Intelligence they Expected Lord Lewis Gordon with 500 men, and therefore begging Mr. Grant to come to protect them. Mr. Grant so far comply’d as to secure the Boats; but after the two reproofs he already got he did not think that he could be Justified if he should march his men a third time, without orders from Lord Loudoun, who surely could best judge when it was proper to employ his men. Therefore he wrote to the Magistrates his opinion, that Lord Lewis would not venture to Cross Spey while Lord Loudoun was so near him and he Mr. Grant above him, but that he could not promise to march any body of men but in concert with and by the Direction of Lord Loudoun (App. 42),[562] and he[Pg 297] could not help being pleased that he had given such an answer when afterwards he Received another letter from Sir Harry Innes wrote that same night, December 28th[Pg 298] (App. No. 43),[563] and Lord Loudouns Letter, December 30th (App. No. 44),[564] in answer to Mr. Grants to him of the 24, wherein he writes Mr. Grant, that he could not yet undertake any new operation; But that how soon he should find it proper to undertake any thing of moment towards the East, he should aquaint Mr. Grant in order to Concert together the most effectual way of Doing it.

Mr. Grant immediately returned to Strathspey because he suspected that once M‘Leod moved forward, some small groups of rebels (which he had heard could be formed in a day) might disrupt the area. He took the risk of leaving a group of 60 men at his house in Mulbain, just two miles from Fochabers, even without orders. He informed Lord Loudoun about this after his return to Castle Grant via a letter on December 24th (App. No. 40),[559] where he renewed his offer to use his entire clan wherever Lord Loudoun thought they could support the government. This small group later proved useful after the unfortunate disaster that befell M‘Leod’s party at Inverury by securing the boats on the Spey for their retreat. On December 25th, Mr. Grant received a letter from Sir Harrie Innes dated December 24th (App. No. 41),[560] detailing the disaster at Inverury,[561] and saying that M‘Leod had reached Elgin and, by his orders, asked Mr. Grant to prepare his men to oppose Lord Lewis Gordon and at least secure the boats on the Spey. Sir Harry urged Mr. Grant to move his men to Rothes for the protection of Murray. On December 29th, he received two letters, one from the magistrates of Elgin and the other from Sir Harrie Innes dated December 28th, informing him that M‘Leod had marched to Forres and, based on their intelligence, expected Lord Lewis Gordon with 500 men, so they were requesting Mr. Grant to come for their protection. Mr. Grant agreed to secure the boats, but after the two reprimands he received, he didn’t feel justified in marching his men a third time without orders from Lord Loudoun, who could best determine when to employ his forces. Therefore, he wrote to the magistrates expressing his belief that Lord Lewis would not risk crossing the Spey while Lord Loudoun was near, and he, Mr. Grant, was above him, but he could not promise to move any troop without the coordination and direction of Lord Loudoun (App. 42),[562] and he couldn’t help feeling pleased with his response when he later received another letter from Sir Harry Innes sent that same night, December 28th[Pg 298] (App. No. 43),[563] and Lord Loudoun's letter from December 30th (App. No. 44),[564] in response to Mr. Grant's letter from the 24th, where he mentioned that he couldn't yet undertake any new operations. However, as soon as he found it appropriate to launch any significant action toward the East, he would inform Mr. Grant to plan the most effective approach together.

[Pg 299]

[Pg 299]

January 9th, 1746, Mr. Grant wrote to my Lord Loudoun by James Grant his Chamberlain of Strathspey (App. No. 45),[565] concerning some new attempts that were made[Pg 300] to force his Tenents of Urquhart into the Rebellion. The reason of sending his Chamberlain was that he might explain to my Lord the particulars and receive his Lordships orders which he was directed to obey, and in that Letter after giving him some further Intelligence Mr. Grant writes as follows:—

January 9th, 1746, Mr. Grant wrote to my Lord Loudoun through James Grant, his Chamberlain of Strathspey (App. No. 45),[565] regarding some recent efforts to pressure his tenants in Urquhart into the Rebellion. He sent his Chamberlain so he could explain the details to my Lord and receive instructions to follow. In that letter, after providing some additional information, Mr. Grant wrote as follows:—

‘I think it my Duty to take nottice to your Lordship that the Rebells are exerting themselves in every corner of the North to encrease their army. I therefore think it absolutely necessary that all the Friends of the Government should use their utmost efforts to Disconcert and Disperse them. I had a meeting yesterday with all the Gentlemen of this Country and I can assure your Lordship we wait only your Lordships order and Directions, and there is nothing in our power but we will do upon this Important occasion for the service of our King and Country. I wish it were possible to Assist us with some arms; and money to be sure would be also necessary; But give me leave to assure your Lordship, that the last Farthing I or any of my Friends have, or that our credit can procure us, shall be employed in supporting of our men upon any expedition your Lordship shall Direct us to undertake for this glorious Cause we are all Ingaged in. I wish to God your Lordship and the Lord President would think of some measure of conveening the whole body of the Kings Friends in the North, and I would[Pg 301] gladely hope we would form such a body as would in a Great Measure disconcert, and strike a Damp upon the army of the Rebells in the South and effectually put a stop to any further Junctions they may Expect benorth Stirling. And at the same time surely we might prevent their being Masters of so much of this North Coast as also hinder many of the Kings Subjects from being opprest by the exorbitant sums of Money the Rebells are at present Levying.’

"I feel it is my duty to bring to your attention that the rebels are actively trying to grow their forces in every corner of the North. Therefore, I believe it's absolutely necessary for all supporters of the Government to do everything they can to disrupt and scatter them. I had a meeting yesterday with all the gentlemen from this area, and I assure you we are only waiting for your orders and guidance. There’s nothing we wouldn’t do in this important situation for the service of our King and Country. I wish it were possible to assist us with some arms; and, of course, money would also be necessary. But please let me assure you that every last penny that I or any of my friends have, or that our credit can secure, will be used to support our men on any mission you direct us to undertake for this noble cause we are all engaged in. I sincerely hope that you and the Lord President will consider some way to bring together all the King’s supporters in the North, as I believe we could create a force that would significantly disrupt and undermine the rebel army in the South and effectively prevent any further alliances they might anticipate north of Stirling. At the same time, we could surely stop them from gaining control of much of this North Coast and protect many of the King’s subjects from the excessive sums of money the rebels are currently imposing."

January 17th Mr. Grant received Lord Loudouns Answer, Dated Jany 16 (App. No. 46),[566] approving indeed Mr. Grants sceme, but that he could not in the present Situation undertake it, till he had got a return to Letters he had sent for Instructions, and a little more certainty of the motions of the Rebells, and that how soon Instructions should arive, he should aquaint Mr. Grant and consult with him.

January 17th, Mr. Grant received Lord Loudoun's response, dated January 16 (App. No. 46), [566] which approved Mr. Grant's plan, but stated that he could not undertake it at this time until he received replies to letters he had sent for instructions, and had a clearer understanding of the movements of the rebels. He promised to inform Mr. Grant as soon as the instructions arrived and to consult with him.

After this nothing Material happened in the North till the Retreat of the Rebells from Stirling and upon the first Intelligence of their coming to Blair[567] Mr. Grant again conveened his men to the number of above Six Hundred tho’ very ill armed whom he stationed in the properest manner he could either for Joining Lord Loudon (who he supposed would probably come to his assistance) to attack the Rebells at the passes in the entrance into the Country, or if Lord Loudoun should not come to his Assistance, and that the Rebells should be too numerous[Pg 302] for him to engage alone, so as to retire but keep in a body and prevent as far as possible their Destroying the Country or forcing away any of his men.

After this, nothing significant happened in the North until the Rebels retreated from Stirling. Upon hearing they were coming to Blair[567], Mr. Grant once again gathered his men, numbering over six hundred, although they were poorly armed. He positioned them as best as he could, either to join Lord Loudon (whom he expected would likely come to help) to confront the Rebels at the key passes into the area, or if Lord Loudon did not arrive and the Rebels were too many for him to handle alone, to retreat while staying organized, in order to prevent, as much as possible, the destruction of the land or the capture of any of his men.[Pg 302]

About February 8th Mr. Grant received a letter from Lord Loudoun, dated 7th (App. No. 47),[568] with what accounts he had of the Rebells motions, and of their Designs on that Country, which he did not seem to think they would soon attempt, and recommends to Mr. Grant first to employ people to get Intelligence, ‘And in the next place I hope you will have your people alert that we may Act by Concert and support one another which I asure you I will to the outmost.’

About February 8th, Mr. Grant received a letter from Lord Loudoun, dated the 7th (App. No. 47),[568] outlining what information he had about the rebels' movements and their plans for the region. Lord Loudoun didn't seem to believe that the rebels would make a move anytime soon and advised Mr. Grant to first hire people to gather intelligence. "And secondly, I hope you will keep your people on high alert so that we can act in concert and support each other, which I assure you I will do to the fullest."

Mr. Grant obeyed both these Orders with all the Exactness that he was Capable of. Sunday, 19th February, he sent by his Chamberlain of Strathspey the Intelligence (App. No. 48),[569] wherein he[Pg 303] begged some arms if any could be spared, and Tuesday, February 11th, sent two Expresses with Intelligence[Pg 304] (vide App. No. 49),[570] that the Rebells were come the length of Ruthven.

Mr. Grant followed both of these orders with all the precision he could manage. On Sunday, February 19th, he sent through his Chamberlain of Strathspey the information (App. No. 48),[569] in which he[Pg 303] requested some weapons if any were available. Then, on Tuesday, February 11th, he sent two messengers with information[Pg 304] (see App. No. 49),[570] that the rebels had reached Ruthven.

February 12th Mr. Grant received Letters from Lord Loudoun and the President of the 11th with accounts that the arms were landed, That Mr. Grants Clan was well armed, yet in the Distribution Lord Loudoun would reserve as many as he could for him.

February 12th Mr. Grant received letters from Lord Loudoun and the President of the 11th with updates that the weapons had arrived. Mr. Grant's clan was well equipped, but in the distribution, Lord Loudoun would hold back as many as he could for him.

They seemed to think Mr. Grant in no Danger of being Disturbed by the Rebells, and mention their Readiness to receive the Rebells and support Mr. Grant (App. No. 50, 51).[571]

They didn’t think Mr. Grant was in any danger of being disturbed by the rebels and mentioned their willingness to receive the rebels and support Mr. Grant (App. No. 50, 51).[571]

February 13th, Mr. Grant sent Lord Loudoun further Intelligence of the Rebells Motions and numbers, beggs to have if possible 400 guns, for that his people were extremely ill armed, tho’ to Deceive the Rebells he behoved to give out the contrary. And the 14th he sent more Intelligence to the Governor of Fort George to be communicated to Lord Loudoun and still Demanding Arms[Pg 305] (App. No. 52),[572] and still further on the 15th (App. No. 53),[573] when the Rebells were come into Strath Spey, the length of Avymore, and were that night to be at Inverlaidnan.[574] Lord Loudouns Letter of February 15th (App. No. 54),[575] which was the last he had from him while att Inverness came to hand Monday, 16th, telling that if the Rebells[Pg 306] should come he hoped to give them a Warm Reception. That as he was threatened with being attacked he could not spare a party to carry arms to Mr. Grant, but that if Mr. Grant would send Down 300 men he would provide them as well as he could.

February 13th, Mr. Grant sent Lord Loudoun more updates on the rebels’ movements and numbers and requested, if possible, 400 guns, as his people were poorly armed. However, to mislead the rebels, he had to imply the opposite. On the 14th, he sent additional information to the Governor of Fort George to be shared with Lord Loudoun, again demanding arms[Pg 305] (App. No. 52),[572] and further on the 15th (App. No. 53),[573] when the rebels had moved into Strath Spey, reaching Avymore, and planned to be at Inverlaidnan that night.[574] Lord Loudoun's letter dated February 15th (App. No. 54),[575] which was the last he received from him while in Inverness, arrived on Monday, the 16th, stating that if the rebels came, he hoped to give them a warm welcome. He mentioned that since he was expecting an attack, he couldn't spare a group to deliver arms to Mr. Grant, but if Mr. Grant sent down 300 men, he would do his best to supply them.

After the 15th Mr. Grant durst not send any Letters to Lord Loudoun, but both the 16th and Munday the 17th (the Day that Inverness was taken)[576] he sent two Expresses each day with accounts of the Rebells motions. And even after Lord Loudoun was gone to Ross, Mr. Grant found means of conveying to him an account of His Royal Highness the Duke marching Northward from Perth, and by the same Conveyance got a Return signed by Lord Loudoun and the President, which he transmitted to Sir Everard Falconer.[577]

After the 15th, Mr. Grant didn't dare send any letters to Lord Loudoun, but on both the 16th and Monday the 17th (the day Inverness was taken), he sent two messages each day with updates on the rebels' movements. Even after Lord Loudoun had gone to Ross, Mr. Grant found a way to inform him that His Royal Highness the Duke was marching north from Perth, and through the same means he received a return message signed by Lord Loudoun and the President, which he passed on to Sir Everard Falconer.

Mr. Grant was made to believe that his Royall Highness was Immediately following in Pursuit of the Highlanders, and therefore kept his men together in order to join the army till Sunday 23rd February that he received a letter from Mr. Murray, secretary to the Pretender (which at present is fallen by hand), Reproaching him for assisting the Government, and for the further offers of assistance made by his Father Sir James Grant which the Rebells had Discovered by Letters sent Mr. Grant by Express by Lord Justice Clerk whom they had Intercepted, and therefore ordering him Betwixt a Day limited to send to Inverness all the arms in the Country with hostages who were named in the Letter for the peaceable Behaviour of the Clan.

Mr. Grant was led to believe that his Royal Highness was actively pursuing the Highlanders, so he kept his men together to join the army until Sunday, February 23rd. On that day, he received a letter from Mr. Murray, the secretary to the Pretender (which has since been lost), chastising him for supporting the Government and for the additional offers of help made by his father, Sir James Grant. The rebels had discovered this through letters sent to Mr. Grant by express from the Lord Justice Clerk, which they had intercepted. Therefore, he was ordered to send all the arms in the country to Inverness along with hostages named in the letter to ensure the clan's peaceful behavior within a limited timeframe.

Mr. Grant at this time had Intelligence, that the[Pg 307] Macphersons, some of the Athol men and the Menzies were in a body in Badenoch above him that Glenbucket with about 300 men were in Strathaven and Glenlivet and that another party was Marching by Murray to enter Strathspey by the Lower end of it; He was Informed that the Duke was still at Perth. He was not an equal Match for all these partys alone, and could not hope for assistance from any Quarter. Therefore he had no Choice but that of either being Besieged in his own House or making good his retreat to the army. The House could not hold out long, and therefore the other was resolved on, and he chose rather to force his way against Glenbucket, than to venture by Ruthven where the M‘Donalds by Joining the M‘Phersons had it in their power to intercept them.

Mr. Grant had learned that the Macphersons, some of the Athol men, and the Menzies were gathered in Badenoch above him, and that Glenbucket, with about 300 men, was in Strathaven and Glenlivet. Another group was moving through Murray to enter Strathspey from the lower end. He was informed that the Duke was still in Perth. He was not a match for all these groups on his own and couldn't expect help from anywhere. So, he had no choice but to either be besieged in his house or make a retreat to the army. The house couldn't hold out for long, so he decided to fight his way against Glenbucket rather than risk going through Ruthven, where the M‘Donalds could join the M‘Phersons and block his escape.

Monday 24th Feby. Lord Findlater and Mr. Grant and their Ladys set out for Strathaven escorted by between 5 and 600 men, and the Better to encourage them to leave their Houses, he proposed to give them his Bond to repair all the Dammage that the Rebells should do them; But the men said that they relied upon his word without any Bond.

Monday, February 24th. Lord Findlater, Mr. Grant, and their ladies set out for Strathaven, escorted by around 500 to 600 men. To encourage them to leave their homes, he offered to give them his promise to fix any damage the rebels might cause. However, the men said they trusted his word without needing any formal agreement.

Upon Mr. Grants marching his men Glenbucket retired from Strathaven into the low Country, and at Strathaven an Express sent by Lord Justice Clark (but who had been taken prisoner by Glenbucket and set at liberty on his retiring) came to him and brought him the news that the Duke was come to Aberdeen.[578] Mr. Grant thereupon directed his course thither, and when he came to Newe, three miles from the house of Forbes of Skellater one of the Rebells, finding himself out of Danger of any Great body of Rebells sent home his men to take care of their Cattle and houses, taking with him only 150 for an escort to Aberdeen, and ordered that all the men in the Country should be ready on the first call to come to Join him.

Upon Mr. Grant marching his men, Glenbucket retreated from Strathaven into the low country. An express sent by Lord Justice Clark (who had been captured by Glenbucket but was released upon his retreat) arrived with news that the Duke had reached Aberdeen. Mr. Grant then set his course in that direction, and when he arrived at Newe, three miles from the house of Forbes of Skellater, one of the rebels, he realized he was no longer in danger from any large group of rebels. He sent his men home to care for their cattle and houses, taking only 150 as an escort to Aberdeen, and instructed all the men in the area to be ready at a moment's notice to join him.

These 150 Mr. Grant marched to Kintore and left them there and March 1st went himself to attend His Royall Highness to Aberdeen; and remained there till the 9th that he was ordered to Inverury, where his men then[Pg 308] were, and from thence to proceed slowly to Strathspey, so as to serve as an advanced Guard to the Troops in their march to Strathbogg, and in that March before he reached Castle Forbes[579] had the Disagreeable news of a Ridiculous and Scandalous Treaty of Neutrality (as it was called) that five Gentlemen of his name had signed to the Rebells which he transmitted to Aberdeen to be communicated to his Royall Highness. As this was done in his Absence and was in his opinion the greatest affront that could have been done him, none living can look upon it with Greater Indignation than he does, notwithstanding of what all these gentlemen say to alleviate it, which is, That finding their country threatened to be Burnt, and no appearance of Immediate Relief, They consulted together on the properest measure to Divert their Ruin, and it was agreed on as the most prudent measure to endeavour to gain Time by treating with the Rebells untill the Army would come up, and for that end to send three of them as Deputys for the Rest, that when these three came to Inverness they were forthwith made prisoners and keept there upon their paroles, and the Rebells insisted that other two gentlemen should likewise come before concluding any Treaty. That by these means they got the matter Delayed for some Days, and when at last a written paper was presented to them to sign promising upon their Honours that neither they nor their Dependents should bear arms against them, They all absolutely refused to sign it, until they were Threatened to be thrown into Dungeons, and Lord George Murray with a party of Two Thousand men and some Cannon ordered to Strathspey to burn and Destroy the Country and then they signed it, believing that in the Strictest Honour, they could not be Bound to perform a promise Extorted from them in such circumstances. That it was Twelve days after their first confinement before this parole was signed and some time Before the dukes passing Spey.[580] Three[Pg 309] of the five were allowed to return home, and how soon Mr. Grant got home to Castle Grant, which was before the Battle of Culloden, These three joined him and were very active in bringing together the men.

These 150 men marched to Kintore and were left there, while on March 1st, Mr. Grant went himself to attend His Royal Highness in Aberdeen. He stayed there until the 9th when he was ordered to Inverury, where his men were at the time. From there, he was to proceed slowly to Strathspey to serve as an advanced guard for the troops marching to Strathbogie. Before he reached Castle Forbes, he received the unpleasant news of a ridiculous and scandalous treaty of neutrality that five gentlemen sharing his name had signed with the rebels, which he sent to Aberdeen to inform His Royal Highness. Since this happened in his absence and he saw it as the greatest insult possible, none can feel more indignant about it than he does, despite what those gentlemen claim to justify their actions. They argue that with their country at risk of being burned and no immediate relief in sight, they decided to figure out a way to prevent their ruin. They agreed that it was wise to try to buy time by negotiating with the rebels until the army could arrive. To that end, they sent three of them as deputies to represent the rest, but when these three arrived in Inverness, they were immediately taken prisoner and held there on their paroles. The rebels insisted that two more gentlemen come before any treaty could be finalized. This tactic delayed matters for several days, and eventually, a written document was presented for them to sign, which required them to promise on their honor that neither they nor their dependents would take up arms against the rebels. They all flatly refused to sign until they were threatened with imprisonment in dungeons, while Lord George Murray was sent with a party of two thousand men and some cannon to Strathspey to burn and destroy the country. Only then did they sign, believing that under such duress, they could not be held to a promise extorted from them. It was twelve days after their initial confinement before this parole was signed, and some time before the Duke crossed the Spey. Three of the five were allowed to return home, and once Mr. Grant got back to Castle Grant before the Battle of Culloden, these three joined him and played a significant role in rallying the men.

This is a plain and genuine narrative of Mr. Grants conduct from the beginning of the late wicked Rebellion until he went to Aberdeen. The part he acted afterwards is already sufficiently known to His Royall Highness the Duke, and Mr. Grant wants not any other Justification, whereas the former part being acted in a corner of the Highlands could not be so generally Known.

This is a straightforward and honest account of Mr. Grant's behavior from the start of the recent terrible Rebellion until he went to Aberdeen. His later actions are already well known to His Royal Highness the Duke, and Mr. Grant doesn't need any further justification, since the earlier part took place in a remote area of the Highlands and wasn't as widely known.

The naked Facts are stated without any observations upon them, which will naturally enough arise to any Person into whose hands this may come. And no Facts are stated but such as are either sufficiently proved by the writings in the Appendix or can be proved beyond Contradiction and no part of another persons conduct mentioned except in so far as it was necessarly Connected with his.

The bare facts are presented without any comments, which will naturally come to anyone who reads this. Only facts that are either well-supported by the documents in the Appendix or can be proven without a doubt are included, and no mention of another person's behavior is made unless it is directly related to theirs.

And it is hoped it does appear that nothing was ommitted on Mr. Grants part that he could Devise for supporting the Government or Distressing the Rebells. He did not indeed know what were Lord Loudouns or Lord Presidents Instructions or powers, nor was it fit that he should know them; But by that means perhaps it was that sometimes he undertook Expeditions and projected scemes that these Gentlemen possibly, yea probably, for good Reasons Judged not to be expedient or seasonable, but however that may be an argument of his want of skill, or of his too great forwardness, but surely it can be none of his want of Zeal to his Most Gracious Sovereign and our present Happy Constitution.

And it is hoped that it is clear nothing was overlooked on Mr. Grant's part that he could devise to support the government or hinder the rebels. He didn't actually know what Lord Loudoun's or the Lord President's instructions or powers were, nor was it appropriate for him to know them. However, this may be why he sometimes took on expeditions and proposed plans that these gentlemen, probably for good reasons, deemed not wise or timely. Regardless, this might indicate his lack of skill or his excessive eagerness, but surely it can't reflect a lack of zeal for his Most Gracious Sovereign and our current Happy Constitution.

[Pg 311]

[Pg 311]


[Pg 313]

[Pg 313]

THE CASE OF THE REV. JOHN GRANT, MINISTER OF URQUHART; AND OF ALEXANDER GRANT OF SHEUGLY IN URQUHART, AND JAMES GRANT, HIS SON


INFORMATION for Mr. JOHN GRANT, Minister of the Gospel at Urquhart

We hear that Mr. John Grant is charged wth reading and explaining to his Congregation and Parishioners in Irish the Pretenders Manifesto from the Pulpit and in other places. This is as false as the Charge is Malicious. I thank God for it I was never reckoned a Bedlamite or a madman, and truly if this Charge were well founded I think that all the Punishment that the Law can conflict [sic] is but to little. How soon ever I had certain information that the Pretenders son was landed I wrote a letter to Lochaber to Mr. John Stewart for intelligence as it was reported the Rebel Army was to besiege Fortaugustus[581] and Inverness. This I did in presence of the Laird of Grants Baillie. I gave a Copy of the return to my letter to the Baillie that he might let the Governor of Inverness and the Laird of Grant see it. The Baillie told me that the Governor own’d that piece of Intelligence to be of vast consequence to the North and that the Laird of Grant was likewise informed of it—the letter inform’d that they were to march directly south.

We hear that Mr. John Grant has been accused of reading and explaining the Pretender's Manifesto to his congregation and parishioners in Irish from the pulpit and elsewhere. This accusation is as false as it is malicious. I'm thankful I’ve never been seen as a madman, and honestly, if this accusation were true, I believe any punishment the law could impose would be far too little. As soon as I got reliable information that the Pretender's son had landed, I wrote a letter to Mr. John Stewart in Lochaber for updates, as it was reported that the rebel army was going to besiege Fort Augustus and Inverness. I did this in front of the Laird of Grant's Baillie. I gave a copy of the reply to my letter to the Baillie so he could show it to the Governor of Inverness and the Laird of Grant. The Baillie told me that the Governor admitted that this information was very important for the North and that the Laird of Grant was also informed—the letter stated that they were going to march directly south.

In Novr when the M‘Donalds and Frasers came to the country in order to raise the men I preach’d publickly agst it and exhorted my congregation to live peaceably.

In November when the M‘Donalds and Frasers came to the area to rally support, I preached publicly against it and urged my congregation to live peacefully.

This rais’d the Wrath of most of my Parishioners who were in the Rebellion agst me insomuch that I was daily insulted even by the meanest of the Parish particularly towards the close of Decr last I was after sermon attacted by above 20 men and threatned to be drowned in a Loch near by for my praying for his Majesty King George. I and some other gentlemen went to a woman in Distress.[Pg 314] Immediately there came into the House 2 fellows with drawn durks to kill me and were it not for some Gentlemen then present I wou’d have suffered for the stroak that was leveld at me cutt an Iron Crook. I was the object of the M‘Donald’s hatred because of my attachment to the present happy Establishment, in so much that in Feby last when the M‘Donalds to the number of 400 or 500 men came to the Country my house was attacked by 8 or 9 of them; they first rapp’d at the doors and windows and then they were to set fire to the house were it not that the Gentlemen with whom they lodged and whose house was close by mine hindered it for fear of his own house.

This sparked the anger of most of my parishioners who were rebelling against me, so much so that I was insulted daily, even by the lowest members of the parish. Particularly towards the end of December last year, after a sermon, I was attacked by more than 20 men who threatened to drown me in a nearby loch for praying for His Majesty King George. Some other gentlemen and I went to help a woman in distress. Immediately, two guys came into the house with drawn daggers to kill me, and if it hadn't been for some gentlemen present, I would have paid the price for the strike aimed at me, which severed an iron crook. I was the target of the MacDonalds' hatred because of my loyalty to the current happy establishment. So, in February last year, when the MacDonalds, numbering around 400 or 500 men, came to the area, my house was attacked by 8 or 9 of them. They first knocked at the doors and windows and then tried to set fire to the house, but the gentlemen who were staying with them, whose house was close to mine, stopped it out of fear for their own home.

My wife spoke to them next day they swore that they wou’d knock me down with butts of their Guns because they’d scorn to give me a better death. My wife was so frighten’d that she sicken’d abhorted and was verie like to have lost her life being confined for 6 weeks to her Bed. I was then obliged to give up preaching. After I was for 2 Sabbaths without preaching my Parishioners cry’d out agst me for their wanting of sermon, then I ventured to preach and prayed for his Majesty King George. But the second Sunday I preached I was mobb’d in the Churchyard and had my Cloaths torn. A fellow who was for some time my officer and whom I turn’d off for his having gone to the North after the Rebels proclaimed publickly in the Churchyard that I should no more pray for King George and that I should have no stipend pay’d me this year, which last hold but to true for I did not receive 40s. of the last years stipends as yet. I was then a 2d time obliged to give up preaching as I had not the Protection of the Law. The Sunday immediately before the Battle of Culloden I was attacted by 4 of the Rebels and very rudely dealt by for my Praying for King George and for having given up preaching they swore that if I would not preach next Sunday and pray for the Pretenders son whom they call’d Prince Charles, They or some of their Corps would attend and shoot me thro’ the head. But blessed be God their power was[Pg 315] soon broken and I then preach’d and pray’d wthout distraction or fear. Towards the beginning of May when Mr. Grant of Grant had with his men left the country of Urquhart and gone to Inverness with the People of Glenmoriston and Urquhart who had surrendered Mr. John Grant was surpris’d to hear of Alexr Grant of Sheugly and his son’s confinement at Inverness. Mr. Grant of Grant wrote to his Bailie to acquaint me to repair to Inverness without loss of time as he had particular business with me in relation to the surrenderers in the Parish of Urquhart. Accordingly I went to Inverness without delay and waited of Mr. Grant, was by him keept for 6 or 7 days living still in the Town on my own Charges without any other business but giving the Characters of the Men who had surrendered in Urquhart. Mr. Grant likewise challeng’d me for asserting Alexr Grant of Sheugly and his son as peaceable subjects and told me that he would put me on my marrow bones for that sometime. After I answer’d Mr. Grant that I attested nothing but what I was conscious was truth; this Conference happen’d in Mr. Grant of Grant’s room on the 9th of May. Sunday thereafter, being the 11th of May, Mr. Grant of Grant sent a Gentleman of his name to my Quarters desiring that I shou’d repair to his Room immediately. I was not within in the meantime but how soon I got notice of it I immediately went to Grants Lodgings where I was made prisoner. I was surprised at this as I suffered in my Person and Means for my attachment to the Government. But upon Reflection my surprise soon evanish’d. I have been minister at Urquhart for near 6 years without legal Gleib, Manse or any of those advantages which the Law allows. I several times apply’d to Mr. Grant of Grant as Patron and principal Heritor in the Parish for redress either by giving me a piece of Land which my Predecessors allways had in farm by the Lairds of Grant or then by consenting to my having Legal Gleib and Manse as the Law directs I was put off with fair promises but no performance. I could not live with any comfort as I was situated, Mr. Grant having [Pg 316]settled a Brother-in-Law of his Bailie’s in the Kitching wch my Predecessors had and all the other houses of the Town excepting one brocken house. This neighbour I got was Bankrupt and his wife a notorious scold. Last year I wrote to Mr. Grant to grant me my conveniences for my own money otherwise to excuse me to ask for them in a legal manner. When Mr. Grant received this letter he rampaged, burnt my Letter, and swore revenge agst me; besides there is near two years stipends due me out of Mr. Grant’s Estate in Urquhart wch wth some mony he has of my Fathers per Bond and to wch I am expressly provided in the Bond makes a pretty good sum and as Mr. Grant likes money very well this is a verie easie Method of paying his debt and being revenged of me at the same time. As the above are all matters of fact I know no other reason for my suffering and confinement to the present Royal Family or that I might be of use to the Government in something which might be very disagreeable both to Mr. Grant and his Bailie.

My wife talked to them the next day. They swore they would take me down with the butts of their guns because they would never give me a better death. My wife was so scared that she became ill, miscarried, and was very close to losing her life, being confined to her bed for six weeks. I was then forced to stop preaching. After I went for two Sundays without preaching, my parishioners complained to me about not having a sermon. So, I decided to preach again and prayed for His Majesty King George. But on the second Sunday I preached, I was mobbed in the churchyard and had my clothes torn. A guy who had been my officer and I had dismissed for going north after the rebels publicly declared in the churchyard that I should no longer pray for King George and that I wouldn't receive any pay this year, which turned out to be true since I hadn't received 40 shillings of last year’s stipend yet. I was then again forced to give up preaching, as I didn’t have the protection of the law. The Sunday right before the Battle of Culloden, I was attacked by four rebels and treated very poorly for praying for King George. They swore that if I didn’t preach the next Sunday and pray for the Pretender’s son, whom they called Prince Charles, they or some of their group would shoot me in the head. But thank God, their power was soon broken, and I preached and prayed without distraction or fear. Towards the beginning of May, after Mr. Grant of Grant had left Urquhart with his men and gone to Inverness with the people of Glenmoriston and Urquhart who had surrendered, Mr. John Grant was surprised to hear about Alexander Grant of Sheugly and his son being confined in Inverness. Mr. Grant of Grant wrote to his bailiff to tell me to go to Inverness without delay because he had specific business with me regarding the surrenderers in the Parish of Urquhart. So, I went to Inverness right away and waited for Mr. Grant. He kept me there for 6 or 7 days, living in town at my own expense, with nothing else to do but provide references for the men who had surrendered in Urquhart. Mr. Grant also challenged me for saying that Alexander Grant of Sheugly and his son were peaceable subjects and threatened to put me on my knees for that sometime. After I told Mr. Grant that I only attested to what I knew to be true, this conversation happened in Mr. Grant of Grant's room on the 9th of May. The following Sunday, on the 11th of May, Mr. Grant of Grant sent a gentleman with his name to my quarters, asking me to come to his room immediately. I wasn't there at the time, but as soon as I got the message, I went to Grant’s lodgings, where I was taken prisoner. I was shocked by this since I had suffered personally and financially for my loyalty to the government. But after thinking it over, my surprise quickly faded. I had been the minister at Urquhart for nearly six years without a legal glebe, manse, or any of the benefits that the law provides. I had several times applied to Mr. Grant of Grant as the patron and main landowner in the parish for either a piece of land which my predecessors always had as a farm from the Lairds of Grant or for him to agree to give me legal glebe and manse as the law requires. I was given nice promises but no results. I couldn’t live comfortably as I was, since Mr. Grant had settled a brother-in-law of his bailiff’s in the kitchen which my predecessors had and all the other houses in town except one broken house. The neighbor I got was bankrupt and his wife was a notorious troublemaker. Last year, I wrote to Mr. Grant asking for a piece of land for my own money, otherwise to excuse me from asking for it legally. When Mr. Grant received this letter, he flew into a rage, burned my letter, and swore revenge against me. Besides that, I have nearly two years of salary due to me from Mr. Grant’s estate in Urquhart, which along with some money he owes me through a bond from my father, for which I am expressly provided in the bond, adds up to a fair sum. Since Mr. Grant likes money a lot, this is an easy way for him to pay off his debt and take his revenge on me at the same time. As all of this is based on fact, I see no other reason for my suffering and imprisonment than my loyalty to the present royal family or because I might be useful to the government in something that could be very disagreeable to both Mr. Grant and his bailiff.

(Signed) John Grantt.

(Signed) John Grantt.

Castle Street, Sixth July 1746.

Castle Street, July 6, 1746.

Minute of the Presbytery of Abertarff

Minutes of the Presbytery of Abertarff

At Fort Augustus, 13th June 1746.

At Fort Augustus, June 13, 1746.

The Presbytry of Abertarph being met and Constitute It was represented that the Revd Mr. John Grant, minister of the Gospel at Urquhart, and member of this Judicatory, had been sometime ago laid under arrest on suspicion of being disaffected to the present happy establishment, and the Presbytery being deeply affected to think that any of their number should give the least umbrage to any mortal on that important subject took Mr. Grant’s past conduct with regard to Government under their most serious deliberation, and upon the whole find Cause to certify that (abstracting from the present Charge brought against him, to which they are entire Strangers, having no immediate Access to enquire into it by reason of the great disturbances here) he still behav’d himself among them as became a minister of the Gospel, discovering upon[Pg 317] every occasion his Inviolable Attachment and Loyalty to his Majesty’s person and Government. Given in name presence and at appointment of Presbytry, date and place forsaid by

The Presbytery of Abertarph met and was established. It was reported that the Rev. Mr. John Grant, the minister of the Gospel at Urquhart and a member of this committee, had been arrested some time ago on suspicion of being disloyal to the current establishment. The Presbytery was deeply troubled that any of their members might cause even the slightest concern regarding this important matter. They carefully considered Mr. Grant’s past behavior concerning the Government and ultimately concluded that, aside from the current charge against him—which they know nothing about due to the significant disturbances here—he had consistently acted as a minister of the Gospel, demonstrating his unwavering loyalty and commitment to His Majesty and the Government on every occasion. Given in the name, presence, and at the appointment of the Presbytery, date and place as stated by

Thom. Frazer, Modr.

Thom. Frazer, Mod.

Minute of the Presbytery of Abernethy

Minute of the Abernethy Presbytery

At Abernethy the 5th Day of July 1746.

At Abernethy on July 5th, 1746.

The Presbytery of Abernethy, taking to their Consideration That the Reverend Mr. John Grant minister of the Gospel at Urquhart had been taken up and shipped off for London upon a Suspicion of treasonable practices during this wicked and unnaturall rebellion, Could not but in Justice to Mr. Grant’s Character Certifie of him as follows. First, That he was born in the Bounds of this Presbytery of Honest parents who professed the Protestant Religion according to the Principles of the Established Church of Scotland and he had his Education in this way. 2dly That as Mr. Grant very early in his younger years thought of applying himself to the Work of the Ministry he attended the Colleges of Philosophy and Divinity and brought from the several Professors sufficient Testimonials of his diligence and progress in his studies as well as of his morall Character so that this Presbytery had Encouragement to enter him upon Trials and upon finding him qualified Did Licence him to preach of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. 3dly That, after he was licenced he continued in the Bounds of this Presbytery for the space of some years and both in his publick Discourses and private Conversation discovered the firmest attachment to His Majesty King George his Person and Government. And had the same Principles and views with respect to Government that all the Members of this Judicatory have particularly That the Security of our Religion and Liberty is inseperably connected with the stability of our Most Gracious Sovereign King George his Throne and the Succession of his Royall Line. And since Mr. Grant removed from our Bounds and was ordained Minister at Urquhart in the neighbouring Presbytery of Abertarph,[Pg 318] which will be about six years agoe he has continued in the strictest friendship and most intimate Correspondence with the most of our Members and still they found that neither his Principles nor practices were anyways Derogatory from what he had early imbibed, publickly owned, and all along practised while among them. And from the Report of some of our Members who have been in the Parish of Urquhart since Mr. Grant was carryed of It is notour and well known there that several Attacks were made on Mr. Grants Life during the Rebellion for his Attachment to the Government and his continuing in his duty to pray for His Majesty King George and the Royall Family.

The Presbytery of Abernethy, considering that the Reverend Mr. John Grant, minister of the Gospel at Urquhart, had been taken and shipped off to London on suspicion of treason during this wicked and unnatural rebellion, felt it was necessary to certify Mr. Grant’s character as follows. First, that he was born in the area of this Presbytery to honest parents who practiced the Protestant Religion according to the principles of the Established Church of Scotland, and he was raised in that faith. Second, Mr. Grant, early in his youth, intended to pursue a ministry career, attending the Colleges of Philosophy and Divinity, and obtained sufficient testimonials from various professors regarding his diligence and progress in his studies, as well as his moral character, which encouraged this Presbytery to put him through trials, and upon finding him qualified, they licensed him to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Third, after being licensed, he remained within the bounds of this Presbytery for several years, and in both his public sermons and private conversations, he demonstrated a strong loyalty to His Majesty King George and his government. He shared the same principles and views regarding governance as all the members of this body, particularly that the security of our religion and liberty is inseparably linked to the stability of our most gracious sovereign King George’s throne and the succession of his royal line. Since Mr. Grant left our bounds and was ordained as Minister at Urquhart in the neighboring Presbytery of Abertarph, about six years ago, he has maintained a close friendship and regular correspondence with most of our members, who still found that his principles and practices were consistent with what he had previously embraced, publicly acknowledged, and practiced while with them. From the reports of some of our members who have been in the Parish of Urquhart since Mr. Grant was taken, it is well-known that several attempts were made on Mr. Grant's life during the rebellion due to his loyalty to the government and his commitment to pray for His Majesty King George and the royal family.

At one time a Man who had the Rank of an Officer in the Rebellious Mob threatned on a Sabbath Day immediately after Divine Worship to seize him, carry him to a Loch in the neighbourhood, and Drown him there, and gott about thirty or fourty of the same Gang to Join in the Undertaking. At anoyr time two Ruffians broke into a Company where Mr. Grant was, attacked him with drawn Durks untill hindered by those who were present. Again on a Sabbath day immediatly as he came out from Sermon some of the Rebells Wives and others fell upon him, tore his Cloaths and abused him so that with great Difficulty he was rescued from them and gott into his own house. Another party of the same wicked Crew threatned publickly to burn his House and Family, when they got their opportunity. Therefore from our Knowledge of Mr. Grant’s Principles, our through Acquaintance of him, together with the Notouriety of thes facts with respect to his Usage by the Rebells, we cannot but hope that he is entirely innocent of any charge of Dissloyalty can be brought agst. him, and we are apt to presume that some invidious person or persons have given in an Information against him which tho’ false in fact may either kill him by Confinement as he is of a tender Constitution or ruin his circumstances by the Expense of such a Process, by either of qch they will sufficientlie gratifie yr malicious views. And we are fully satisfied that if there is the least[Pg 319] of misconduct chargeable on Mr. Grant it must have been entirely owing to Inadvertency and oversight and not the effect of Principle or Design. Given Day and Date above in name in presence and by appointment of the Presbytery of Abernethy, and signed by

At one time, a man who held the rank of an officer in the rebellious mob threatened on a Sunday, right after church service, to capture him, take him to a nearby loch, and drown him. He gathered about thirty or forty members of the same gang to join in this plan. At another time, two thugs broke into a gathering where Mr. Grant was present and attacked him with knives until those there intervened. Again, on a Sunday, just as he left the sermon, some of the rebels' wives and others assaulted him, ripped his clothes, and mistreated him to the point that he was only barely saved and managed to get back into his own house. Another group from the same wicked crowd openly threatened to burn down his house and family when they had the chance. Therefore, considering our understanding of Mr. Grant’s principles, our thorough acquaintance with him, along with the notoriety of these facts regarding his treatment by the rebels, we can only hope that he is completely innocent of any charges of disloyalty that may be brought against him. We suspect that some spiteful person or persons have filed a complaint against him, which, although factually false, could either destroy him through confinement since he has a delicate constitution or ruin his financial situation due to the costs of such a process, thereby satisfying their malicious intentions. We are fully convinced that if there is any hint of misconduct associated with Mr. Grant, it must be due entirely to inadvertence and oversight, not a matter of principle or intention. Given the day and date above, in the name of and in the presence of the Presbytery of Abernethy, and signed by

Pat Grant, Modr.

Pat Grant, Mod.

The Examination of John Grant, minister of Urquhart near Inverness

The Examination of John Grant, minister of Urquhart near Inverness

Westminster

Westminster

to Wit.

to clarify.

Being asked where he was at the time that the Rebellion first of all broke out, he saith, that he was at his own Parish at Urquhart aforesaid, where he continued from the Beginning to the end of the said Rebellion without stirring from thence to the distance of 10 miles. Being asked whether or no the Laird of Grant ever made him, the Examt, privy to any Intention which he the Lord of Grant had of raising his men for the Service of the Government, or ever sent for him to any consultation about what measures were proper to be taken by the Grants upon occasion of the Rebellion, he saith, that he was not either privy to the Intentions of the said Laird of Grant, or was he ever sent for to any place by the said Laird of Grant to give his advice or opinion what was proper to be done about raising the Grants: He Saith, he remembers that upon the breaking out of the Rebellion the Laird of Grants Baillie who was at Urqhart where the Examt also was told the Examt privately that the Laird of Grant was not determined, and would not determine what to do, till he saw how matters were likely to turn out or that effect and whoever should first attack his, the Laird of Grants country whether but in general it was       [sic]

When asked where he was when the Rebellion first broke out, he said that he was at his own parish in Urquhart, where he stayed from the beginning to the end of the Rebellion without traveling more than 10 miles away. When asked if the Laird of Grant ever informed him of any plans to gather his men for the government’s service, or if he was ever summoned for any discussions about what actions the Grants should take regarding the Rebellion, he stated that he was neither aware of the Laird of Grant's intentions nor was he ever called upon by the Laird to share his advice or opinions on raising the Grants. He recalled that when the Rebellion began, the Laird of Grant's bailiff, who was also in Urquhart, privately told him that the Laird had not made up his mind and would not decide what to do until he saw how things were likely to unfold, and whoever would be the first to attack the Laird of Grant's territory, whether generally or specifically.

[sic]       Rebels or the Kings Forces He the Laird of Grant wd raise his men against them.

[sic] Rebels or the King's Forces He, the Laird of Grant, would raise his men against them.

was told to the People of Urqhart that it was the said Laird’s desire that the People should live peaceably. This[Pg 320] was upon the first appearance of the Rebellion when the Gentlemen in the Grant’s country sent to the Laird of Grant to desire his assistance and advice, as they were threatned with Fire and Sword by Lochiel, unless they would rise and join the Pretender’s Son, and he saith that the Baillie aforesaid told the Examt sometime afterwards privately the Laird would not be averse to some part of his Clan’s joining the Pretenders son Privately in order to save the Country. Being asked whether he was one of those who opposed the Laird of Grant’s accepting the Company which was first offer’d by the Lord President to the said Laird for raising the Grants for the Government, he saith he was not, nor was he privy to or advised with concerning the said company. He saith, that sometime in November last a Party of the MacDonalds and Fraziers came to Urqhart under the command of M‘Donald of Barrisdale and the Master of Lovat, the whole amounting to about 4 or 500 men: that M‘Donald and the Master of Lovat lodged at the Examts house two or three Days at that time, and the reason of which was, that the Examts wife was related to the Master of Lovat’s Family: that the Master of Lovat and another person of the name of Frazer applied to the Examt to be Chaplain to them, and promised to give him six and eight pence a day, if he would consent thereto, to which the Examt answer’d, that if they would go to Inverness to serve his Majesty King George, he would be their chaplain with all his heart for one third of the money that he reproached them for having taken up arms for a Popish Pretender, and shew’d them the consequences of such Behaviour. That the Master of Lovat said, he was acted upon, and as he was engaged so far, must go on still further: That, whether they applied to him to be chaplain in Joke or Earnest, he cannot say, tho’ he is well satisfied that they both knew the Examt to be in a very different way of thinking from them: that, neither of them used the Examt ill, or insulted him upon account of his being steady to the Government: but that some of their men quarrelled with the Examt on account of his having preached against the Rebellion, and dissuaded[Pg 321] them from it in the strongest terms he could use, and on account of his having prayed publickly in the Church for His Majesty, and told the Examt that it became him not to preach and pray in that manner. He saith, that during the time the said Party was at Urquhart, he made it his Business to declaim against the Rebellion, and whenever he heard of any People who had an Intention to join the Rebels, he went to them and used the most prevailing arguments he could to turn them from their Design: that MacDonald and the Master of Lovat having soon found that the Examt was determined not to engage with them, did not open themselves to him about their Intentions at all: that he several times was in Danger of his Life from MacDonalds upon account of the aversion he constantly express’d upon all occasions in public and private against their undertakings.

The people of Urquhart were informed that the Laird wanted them to live peacefully. This was around the time when the Rebellion first broke out, and the gentlemen in Grant’s country reached out to the Laird of Grant for help and advice because they were threatened with violence by Lochiel unless they joined the Pretender’s son. He mentioned that the Baillie later privately told him that the Laird wouldn’t be opposed to some of his Clan joining the Pretender's son secretly to protect the country. When asked if he was against the Laird of Grant accepting the opportunity that the Lord President first offered him to gather the Grants for the government, he said he wasn't and had no knowledge or involvement in that matter. He stated that sometime in November, a group of MacDonalds and Fraziers came to Urquhart led by M‘Donald of Barrisdale and the Master of Lovat, totaling about 400 to 500 men. M‘Donald and the Master of Lovat stayed at his house for two to three days because his wife was related to the Master of Lovat’s family. The Master of Lovat and another man named Frazer asked him to be their chaplain, offering him six and eight pence a day if he agreed. He replied that if they were going to Inverness to serve King George, he would gladly be their chaplain for a third of what they offered, while criticizing them for taking up arms for a Popish Pretender and explaining the fallout of such actions. The Master of Lovat said he felt compelled to continue on the path he was on. He couldn't say if they were joking or serious when they asked him to be chaplain, though he believed they both knew he thought very differently than them. Neither of them treated him poorly or insulted him for his loyalty to the government, but some of their men confronted him for preaching against the Rebellion, as he urged them strongly not to join. He publicly prayed for His Majesty in the church, which led to them telling him he shouldn't preach or pray like that. During the time the group was in Urquhart, he focused on speaking out against the Rebellion. Whenever he learned of anyone planning to join the rebels, he approached them and used the best arguments he could to dissuade them. Since M‘Donald and the Master of Lovat quickly realized he was determined not to join them, they didn’t reveal their intentions to him at all. He often found himself in danger from MacDonalds because he consistently expressed his opposition to their actions both publicly and privately.

He saith, that after the said Party of the Macdonalds and Fraziers had quitted Urquhart, other Partys of the Rebels were continually passing and repassing thro’ the said County: that the Examt persevered in his Endeavours to dissuade them from their engagements, and was very often in Danger of his Life upon that account; that about the latter end of the Month of February last the General Rendezvous of the Rebel army was about a mile from his house, that there was a general cry thro’ all the said Army that the Examt was not to be tolerated in the daring manner in which he acted for the Government: that he received several notices that his House should be plunder’d and burnt unless he desisted: that his Life was also several times threatned; that the Highlanders publickly declared that he deserved no other kind of Death than to be beaten in Pieces with the Butt Ends of their Guns: and upon the 21st and 22d of February he expected nothing but Death from them.

He says that after the Macdonalds and Fraziers left Urquhart, other groups of rebels were constantly moving in and out of the county. The witness continued to try to convince them to abandon their plans and was often in danger of his life because of it. Around the end of February, the main camp of the rebel army was about a mile from his house, and there was a widespread outcry throughout the army that the witness should not be tolerated for his bold actions in support of the government. He received several warnings that his house would be looted and burned unless he stopped his efforts. His life was threatened multiple times, and the Highlanders openly declared that he deserved to be beaten to death with the butts of their guns. On February 21st and 22nd, he expected nothing but death from them.

Being asked, whether he received or conveyed any Letters to or from any Persons concerned in the Rebellion to or from any People concerned in the same, he saith, he never was directly or indirectly concerned in any thing of that sort, nor was he ever directly or indirectly the[Pg 322] Instrument of receiving or conveying any verbal messages to or from any of the Persons concerned in the said Rebellion to or from their accomplices.

When asked if he received or sent any letters to or from anyone involved in the Rebellion, he stated that he was never directly or indirectly involved in anything like that, nor was he ever the[Pg 322] means of receiving or sending any verbal messages to or from any of the people involved in the Rebellion or their accomplices.

Being asked, whether he ever willingly gave any Harbour or Protection or assistance of any kind whatever to the Rebels; he saith, he never did, on the contrary he saith, that he took all the methods he could to prevent their receiving any Party where had or could exert his Influence.

Being asked if he ever willingly provided any harbor, protection, or assistance of any kind to the rebels, he says he never did. On the contrary, he claims he did everything he could to prevent them from receiving any support where he had or could exert his influence.

Being asked whether he was Privy to the Neutrality which was signed by some of the Grants for the Rest whilst the Duke was at Aberdeen, he saith, that he was not Privy to it in any shape nor any ways assisting or advising in it.

Being asked if he knew about the Neutrality signed by some of the Grants for the Rest while the Duke was in Aberdeen, he said that he was not aware of it in any way and did not assist or advise on it at all.

Being asked whether if the Laird of Grant had exerted himself to the utmost for the Government he might not have been of great service to it, He saith, that his opinion is that if the Laird of Grant had been so disposed he might have been of great service.

Being asked if the Laird of Grant could have really helped the Government if he had tried his best, he says that he believes the Laird of Grant could have been very helpful if he had chosen to.

He saith, that he was informed by the Factor of the Earl of Stair, that Glenmorrison told him, the said Factor, that he Glenmorrison went out to assist the Pretender’s son with a Party of the Grants by the Laird of Grant’s advice.

He said that he was told by the Factor of the Earl of Stair that Glenmorrison informed him, the said Factor, that he, Glenmorrison, went out to help the Pretender’s son with a group of Grants at the Laird of Grant’s suggestion.

He saith, that with relation to the 84 Grants, who surrendered at Inverness, they were indeed engaged to surrender before the Examt saw them, but he strengthened and confirmed them in their Resolution.

He says that regarding the 84 Grants, who surrendered at Inverness, they were actually committed to surrendering before the Examt saw them, but he reinforced and solidified their decision.

He saith, that he never assisted the Rebels in any shape whatever; never was privy to any of their Schemes or Plots: never served them in any manner; but on the contrary opposed them, preached against the Rebellion constantly, and constantly prayed for King George, to the daily hazard of his life for several months: that he was so well known and remarked for opposing them to the utmost, that he was the object of their Hatred, and that it is next to a miracle that he was not sacrificed to their Resentment.

He says that he never helped the Rebels in any way at all; he was never aware of any of their plans or plots; he never served them in any capacity; instead, he opposed them, preached against the Rebellion all the time, and consistently prayed for King George, putting his life at risk every day for several months. He was so well known and noted for opposing them completely that he became their target of hatred, and it's almost a miracle that he wasn't a victim of their anger.

John Grantt.

John Grantt.

Whitehall, 14 Aug. 1746.

Whitehall, Aug 14, 1746.

Taken before me, Thos. Waite.

Taken before me, Thos. Waite.

[Pg 323]

[Pg 323]

Information for Alexander Grant of Sheugly and James Grant his son

Info for Alexander Grant of Sheugly and James Grant, his son

As to the Case of Mr. Grant of Shewgly, It’s informed That he is impeached with a Correspondence wth the Pretenders Son. This is absolutely false in itself, as he never corresponded with him in word or write in his life, but upon the Pretenders son arrival in Arisake how soon he set up his Fathers Standart that he wrote circular letters to all the countrys in the Highlands desiring to assist and join him with all the men they could agains a preceese day, among which there was a letter sent to the Country of Urquhart directed for the sd Alexr Grant and the rest of the Gentlemen of Urquhart with one other to the Laird of Grant himself. The very next morning after receiving the letter they chapterly conveened in order to consider of the proper use to be made therof, and what was thought upon was: immediately to send that Letter with the other letter to Mr. Grant younger of Grant by the Baillie of Urquhart to make the legal use thereof as he thought proper; All this accordingly was done with that very breath and the Baillie went accordingly. This letter was keeped by Mr. Grant till such time as the said Alex Grant was made prisoner at Inverness and then gave it to the Duke of Cumberlands Secretary.

Regarding the Case of Mr. Grant of Shewgly, it's reported that he is accused of having correspondence with the Pretender's son. This claim is completely false, as he never communicated with him in person or in writing in his entire life. However, when the Pretender's son arrived in Arisake, he quickly raised his father's standard and wrote circular letters to all the regions in the Highlands, asking for assistance and for all the men they could gather to join him by a specific date. Among these letters, one was sent to the region of Urquhart addressed to Sir Alexander Grant and the other gentlemen of Urquhart, along with another to the Laird of Grant himself. The very next morning after receiving the letter, they gathered together to discuss how to use it. What they decided was to send that letter, along with the other, to Mr. Grant, younger of Grant, through the Baillie of Urquhart, so he could make the appropriate use of it as he saw fit. All of this was done right away, and the Baillie went as planned. Mr. Grant kept this letter until the aforementioned Alexander Grant was captured in Inverness, at which point he gave it to the Duke of Cumberland's secretary.

As also its informed that the said Alex Grant was assisting in sending men from the Country of Urquhart to join the Rebels. This is also false and injurious as it can be made plainly appear, that the sd Alexr Grant at three several times did turn back some of the Gentlemen of the Country wth a considerable body of men who marched bag and baggage under full arms six miles from their habitation, and that by the sd Alex Grants persuasion, tho the Country was very oft harased and threatened wth destruction, prevailed withal to stay at home till some time in February last that a Regiment of the Macdonalds came to the Country to force the men, or otherways under-go[Pg 324] utter destruction by burning the country and destroying their heal effects, which to prevent the most of the Gentlemen with three or four score men went alongs, and with all the persuasion in the said Alex Grants power could not get them prevailed upon to stay.

It is also reported that Alex Grant was helping to send men from the country of Urquhart to join the rebels. This is not true and is damaging because it can be clearly shown that Alex Grant turned back some gentlemen from the area three different times, along with a substantial group of men who marched with their belongings, fully armed, six miles from their homes. Despite the repeated threats and destruction faced by the country, Alex Grant persuaded many to stay home until sometime in February when a regiment of the Macdonalds came to the area to force the men to join them, or else face complete devastation by burning their land and destroying their livestock. To prevent this, most of the gentlemen, along with three or four score men, went along, and despite all Alex Grant’s efforts, he could not convince them to stay.

And further to testifie the sd Alexr Grant his sincere endeavours to assist the Government. Mr. Grant younger of Grant wth five or six hundred of his men having come to the Country of Urquhart some time after the Battle of Culloden, in order to get the Grants of Glenmoriston and Urquhart to surrender, Mr. Grant did put upon him the said Alex. Grant in the strongest manner to concur and assist to get his purpose effectual, which the sd Alex Grant accordingly went about and with a great deal of labour and fatigue both night and day got them at last convinced, and with great difficulty prevailed with them to surrender, providing they could be made sure of their lives, which Mr. Grant not only engaged by Vow and Oath but by a very binding Letter under his hands to Grant of Daldeagan, which letter is still extant to produce in the Duke of Cumberland’s hands. This seems no less than a paradox in itself considering that Mr. Grant gave out to the Duke of Cumberland that he and his men apprehended them in Rocks and Woods. The next day after their meeting the said Alex Grant with 84 men of the Grants of Glenmoriston and Urquhart came near Mr. Grants lodging there and surrendered prisoners upon terms and gave up their arms before Sir Alexander Macdonald and several other Gentlemen, and the next day thereafter Mr. Grant with his men marched directly to Inverness with the surrender. But the said Alex Grant, being in a bad state of health after the fatigue and strugle he had in this interpose, came to take leave of his young Chief and return home, but Mr. Grant told him that he would not part with him till he had got the Duke of Cumberland to thank him for his services, and that it was otherways necessary his going to Inverness, to give a character of the Men for their more speedy Relief, which accordingly he comply’d wth, and less than an hour after their arrival[Pg 325] at Inverness Mr. Grant sent for him to his own Lodging upon pretence of material business relating to this affair, and within two minutes after coming to him the said Mr. Lewis Grant told him that he was sorry to understand that he the said Alex Grant was to be made prisoner, which immediately was done and carried to the Comon Guard, Mr. Grant giving him the strongest assurance that he would be released the next morning. Its to be observed that if the said surrenders had been dismissed at Inverness according to Mr. Grants promise the whole Rebells then in arms in the Highlands of Scotland had surrendered in less than ten days, the Grants being the very first that did surrender.

To further confirm Alexander Grant's genuine efforts to support the Government, Mr. Grant, younger of Grant, along with five or six hundred of his men, arrived in the country of Urquhart some time after the Battle of Culloden to persuade the Grants of Glenmoriston and Urquhart to surrender. Mr. Grant strongly urged Alexander Grant to work with him to achieve this goal. Alexander took on the task and, after much hard work and exhaustion day and night, eventually convinced them to surrender, provided they could be guaranteed their lives. Mr. Grant not only promised this with a vow and an oath but also provided a very binding letter under his hand to the Grant of Daldeagan, which still exists in the Duke of Cumberland's possession. This situation seems paradoxical, considering that Mr. Grant informed the Duke of Cumberland that he and his men had captured them in the rocks and woods. The day after their meeting, Alexander Grant, along with 84 men from the Grants of Glenmoriston and Urquhart, approached Mr. Grant's quarters and surrendered as prisoners under certain conditions, handing over their weapons before Sir Alexander Macdonald and several other gentlemen. The following day, Mr. Grant and his men marched directly to Inverness with the surrender. However, Alexander Grant, after the fatigue and struggle he experienced in this matter, came to say goodbye to his young chief and return home. Mr. Grant insisted that he would not part with him until he had received thanks from the Duke of Cumberland for his services and mentioned that it was also necessary for him to go to Inverness to provide a reference for the men to secure their quicker relief. Alexander complied, and less than an hour after their arrival at Inverness, Mr. Grant summoned him to his lodging under the pretense of discussing important matters related to this situation. Within two minutes of being with him, Mr. Lewis Grant expressed his regret to learn that Alexander Grant was to be made a prisoner, which immediately happened, and he was taken to the Common Guard. Mr. Grant assured him that he would be released the next morning. It should be noted that if the surrender had been handled in Inverness as promised by Mr. Grant, all the rebels still armed in the Highlands of Scotland would have surrendered in less than ten days, with the Grants being the very first to do so.

As to James Grant his case what is laid to his Charge is still a mistery so that no particular answer can be made to it, but it can be always made appear that since the beginning of the Rebellion he stayed peaceably at home and after several attempts made upon him defied the Rebells request to move him any manner of way, and still continued so till Mr. Grant younger of Grant after the Battle of Culloden brought his Militia to Inverness, and having sent for a number of men to Urquhart to join him, the sd James Grant with sixty men directly march’d to Inverness, joined Mr. Grant and the rest of his men there, with whom he continued a Captain till such time as Mr. Grant returned from Urquhart to Inverness wth the surrenderers. The said James Grant was very assistful with his father to get the said number of men to surrender, wch Mr. Grant had never done but by their persuasion, immediately as they arrived at Inverness Mr. Grant employed the sd James Grant to make out a list of the number of men under his command in order to provide them Quarters, this being done was sent for, to come to his Lodgings, where he remained till his father came up, and with the same breath Mr. Grant told him he was to be made prisoner but not to be afraid, that tomorrow he would see him relieved, and so forth was carried with his father prisoner to the Comon Guard but never heard a word from Mr. Grant till this moment.

As for James Grant, the specifics of the charges against him are still a mystery, so a detailed response can't be given. However, it can always be shown that since the start of the Rebellion, he stayed peacefully at home and, despite several attempts to involve him, he resisted the Rebels' requests to move in any way. He continued to do so until Mr. Grant, the younger Grant, brought his Militia to Inverness after the Battle of Culloden. After sending for several men from Urquhart to join him, James Grant marched with sixty men directly to Inverness, joined Mr. Grant and the rest of his men there, and served as a Captain until Mr. Grant returned from Urquhart to Inverness with the surrendering men. James Grant was very helpful to his father in persuading the men to surrender, which Mr. Grant could not have achieved without their influence. As soon as they arrived in Inverness, Mr. Grant asked James Grant to compile a list of the men under his command to provide them with accommodations. Once that was done, he was called to Mr. Grant’s lodgings, where he stayed until his father arrived. In that same breath, Mr. Grant informed him that he was going to be taken prisoner but advised him not to worry because he would be released the following day. Thus, he was taken with his father to the Common Guard, but he never heard another word from Mr. Grant until this moment.

[Pg 326]

[Pg 326]

The said Alex Grant is informed that the said Mr. Lewis Grant has given as an article of accusasion agst him that some of his children had been sent by him the said Alex Grant to join and carry arms for the Pretender. The said Alex Grant owns so much of this Charge, that contrary to his inclination and frequent instruction his said Children (who were not staying with him) some of them did join the Rebell armie and the said Alex Grant offers to make it appear by Gentlemen of undoubted credit and firm attachment to the Government that he used all the interest he was master of both as a parent and a friend to the present Government to keep his children at home, and that from the time his children who so engaged had taken such resolution none of them durst ever appear in his presence. It is submitted whether or not the said Alex Grant could have done more to keep his children at home.

Alex Grant is informed that Mr. Lewis Grant has accused him of sending some of his children to join and fight for the Pretender. Alex Grant admits part of this accusation, stating that against his will and repeated instructions, some of his children (who were not living with him) did join the rebel army. Alex Grant offers to prove, through reputable gentlemen loyal to the Government, that he did everything he could, both as a parent and as a friend to the current Government, to keep his children at home. He explains that once his children made that choice, they were too afraid to be seen in his presence. It is questioned whether Alex Grant could have done any more to prevent his children from leaving home.

(Signed) Alexander Grantt.
James Grantt.

(Signed) Alexander Grantt.
James Grantt.

Castle Street, Sixth July 1746.

Castle Street, July 6, 1746.

The Examination of James Grant of Sheugly, Esq.[582]

The Examination of James Grant of Sheugly, Esq.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Westminster to Wit.

Westminster to Wit.

14th Aug. 1746.

August 14, 1746.

Being asked where he was when the Rebellion in Scotland first broke out, he saith, that he was in his own County in the parish of Urquhart, where he continued from the beginning to the end of the Rebellion without going to any Place of any Distance from the said Parish of Urquhart. Being asked whether he was one of the Gentlemen consulted by the Laird of Grant upon the occasion of the Lord President’s offering a company to the said Laird for raising men for the Government which Gentlemen[Pg 327] refused to accept of the said one Company, he saith he was not, nor was he ever advised with or consulted thereupon: Nor did the Laird of Grant ever send to the Examinant or to his Father, who is lately dead, to come to him in order to advise and consult with them upon the measures to be taken upon that occasion: he saith, that the Laird of Grant’s Bailly upon the Rebellion first breaking out told the Grants publickly, that it was the Lairds desire that they should remain peaceable and quiet, but the said Bailie told this Examt and his father and two other Gentlemen of the name of Grant privately that it was the said Lairds desire that a Company of the Grants should join the Pretender’s son privately in order to protect the Country. He saith, that he was never sent for during the Rebellion by the said Laird of Grant upon any occasion to be advised with, or consulted with about it: that in the Progress of the Rebellion, several different parties of the Rebels came into that part of the Country, where the Examt was, and pressed him to take on with them, but that he constantly refused them, and would not have anything to do with them.

When asked where he was when the Rebellion in Scotland first started, he says he was in his home county in the parish of Urquhart, where he stayed from the start to the end of the Rebellion without traveling to any places far from Urquhart. When asked if he was one of the gentlemen consulted by the Laird of Grant regarding the Lord President's offer of a company to the Laird for raising men for the Government, which the gentlemen refused to accept, he says he was not, nor was he ever consulted about it. He also says that the Laird of Grant never sent for him or his recently deceased father to come and discuss the measures to be taken at that time. He states that the Laird of Grant's Bailie, when the Rebellion first broke out, told the Grants publicly that it was the Laird's wish for them to remain peaceful and quiet, but the Bailie privately told him, his father, and two other gentlemen with the name of Grant that the Laird actually wanted a company of the Grants to secretly join the Pretender's son in order to protect the country. He insists that he was never called upon during the Rebellion by the Laird of Grant for advice or consultation about it; that during the course of the Rebellion, several different groups of rebels came into his area and pressured him to join them, but he consistently refused and wanted nothing to do with them.

He saith, that he never was directly nor indirectly concerned in receiving or conveying of any letters or verbal messages to or from any Persons in the Rebellion to any persons whatever, nor did he willingly harbour, protect, or supply in any shape any of the aforesaid Persons, nor was he ever made privy to any designs or Intentions of the said Rebels.

He says that he was never directly or indirectly involved in receiving or sending any letters or verbal messages to or from anyone in the Rebellion to anyone else, nor did he willingly shelter, protect, or support any of those individuals in any way, nor was he ever aware of any plans or intentions of the said Rebels.

He saith, that different Partys of the Rebels who passed thro’ the Country having threatened to use violence to some of the Grants unless they would join them, a Party of them with a Gentleman at their Head, went to Castle Grant to take the Directions of the Laird, and offer’d to go and join Lord Loudoun or any one else, if he would give them orders in writing for so doing: that the Laird of Grant told them, they might go and join the Devil if they would, and imprisoned the Gentleman who came along with them for two or three days for his officiousness.

He said that different groups of rebels passing through the country threatened to use violence against some of the Grants unless they joined them. A group of them, led by a gentleman, went to Castle Grant to get directions from the Laird and offered to join Lord Loudoun or anyone else if he would give them written orders to do so. The Laird of Grant told them they could go join the Devil if they wanted, and he imprisoned the gentleman who came with them for two or three days for being too eager.

He saith, that he made it his Business whenever he had[Pg 328] an opportunity, to dissuade those whom he could come at from engaging in the Rebellion, and exerted his utmost endeavours to convince them of the rashness of their undertaking.

He says that he made it his mission, whenever he had[Pg 328] the chance, to talk to anyone he could and discourage them from joining the rebellion, doing his best to convince them how reckless their plans were.

Being asked whether he was privy to the Neutrality signed by some Gentlemen amongst the Grants, whilst the Rebels were at Aberdeen, He saith, he was not privy to it in any shape, nor doth he know who were the conductors of that Neutrality.

Being asked if he knew about the Neutrality agreement signed by some gentlemen among the Grants while the Rebels were in Aberdeen, he stated that he didn't know anything about it at all, nor does he know who was involved in that Neutrality.

After the Battle of Culloden some of the Grants remaining in arms for the Pretender’s Son the Examt and his Father were sent to by the Laird of Grant (who had never sent to the Examt or his Father during the Rebellion before) to go to the said People and persuade them to surrender: He saith, that he and his Father accordingly went to the said men, and with the assistance of the Revd Mr. John Grant prevailed with them to surrender, and marched with them for that purpose to Inverness, where to his great surprise the Examt, His Father, and the said Revd Mr. Grant were made Prisoners with the aforesaid Rebels, and sent up hither for he does not know what.

After the Battle of Culloden, some of the Grants who were still fighting for the Pretender’s Son and his father were sent by the Laird of Grant (who had never contacted the Pretender’s Son or his father during the Rebellion) to persuade these men to surrender. He states that he and his father did go to these men, and with the help of Rev. Mr. John Grant, managed to convince them to surrender. They then marched with them to Inverness for that purpose, where to his great surprise, the Pretender’s Son, his father, and Rev. Mr. Grant were taken prisoner along with the aforementioned rebels and sent away, though he doesn't know for what reason.

He saith, that he verily believes that the ill-usage his Father met with, served in a great degree to shorten his father’s life. He saith, that all his and his Father’s Cattle were taken from them for some time for not joining the Rebels: that he never held any correspondences with the Rebels in any shape, nor ever was instrumental in serving them at all, and that if he behaved civilly to them whilst they remained in the Country where the Examt was it was out of Fear and not the effect of Inclination.

He says that he truly believes the mistreatment his father experienced significantly contributed to his father’s shortened life. He claims that all of his and his father’s livestock were taken from them for a while because they didn’t join the rebels. He emphasizes that he never had any communication with the rebels in any form, nor did he ever help them in any way. He states that if he acted politely toward them while they were in the area where the examination took place, it was out of fear and not because he wanted to.

Being asked whether it be his opinion that if the Laird of Grant had wrote to the People in the Country to rise for the Government the said People would have taken up arms for the Government, he saith, that he verily believes if the laird of Grant had done so, the Country would have joined the Kings Troops, and done all the service in their Power, but this was neglected by the said Laird of Grant till the Battle [Pg 329]of Culloden was over, when the Examt joined the said Laird at his request with 50 or 60 men, being all who were capable of bearing arms in the Country, and that being the first and only Request which the Laird of Grant ever made to the Examt upon occasion of the Rebellion.

When asked if he thinks that if the Laird of Grant had written to the people in the country to support the government, they would have taken up arms for it, he said that he truly believes if the Laird of Grant had done that, the country would have rallied to the King's Troops and done everything they could. However, the Laird of Grant didn't act on this until after the Battle [Pg 329] of Culloden had passed. At that point, the Examt joined the Laird at his request with 50 or 60 men, who were the only ones capable of bearing arms in the country. This was the first and only request the Laird of Grant ever made to the Examt regarding the rebellion.

(Signed) James Grantt.

(Signed) James Grantt.

Whitehall, August 14, 1746.

Whitehall, August 14, 1746.

Taken before me,

Taken in front of me,

Thos. Waite.

Thos. Waite.

To His Grace the Duke of Newcastle, one of his Majesty’s Principal Secretarys of State, the Petition of Alexander Grant of Shewgly, Esq., James Grant his son, and the Rev. Mr. John Grant, minister of the Gospel at Urquhart, prisoners in Tilbury fort.[583]

To Your Grace the Duke of Newcastle, one of the King's Principal Secretaries of State, the Petition of Alex Grant of Shewgly, Esq., James Grant his son, and the Rev. Mr. John Grant, minister of the Gospel at Urquhart, prisoners in Tilbury fort.[583]

Humbly sheweth, that Lewis Grant of Grant, Esqr, son of Sir James Grant, Bart, having with his men, some days after the Battle of Culloden, joyned his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland did by his Royal Highness’s Permission march with them to the Country of Urquhart near Inverness, to seize and bring in such Rebels as should be found in arms against the Government, That finding none he apply’d to your Petitioners who were then (as they had been ever since this unhappy rebellion) quiet and peaceable at their respective Homes entreating them as persons of Rank and Figure in that Country to use their best endeavours with such Rebels as might be still in Arms, to lay them down and surrender to the said Mr. Grant, with assurances that he would intercede with his Royal Highness in their behalf, and that after such surrender they should be permitted to return to their respective Places of Abode.

Humbly shows that Lewis Grant of Grant, Esq., son of Sir James Grant, Bart, joined his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland with his men a few days after the Battle of Culloden. With the Duke's permission, he marched with them to the country of Urquhart near Inverness to capture and bring in any Rebels found armed against the Government. Finding none, he turned to your Petitioners, who had been peaceful and quiet in their homes since this unfortunate rebellion. He asked them, as respected figures in the area, to do their best to persuade any remaining Rebels to lay down their arms and surrender to Mr. Grant, assuring them that he would speak to his Royal Highness on their behalf, and that after surrendering, they would be allowed to return to their homes.

That your Petitioners were so successful as to prevail[Pg 330] upon 84 Rebels of the name of Grant to surrender themselves and their arms to the said Mr. Grant, which he then thankfully and gratefully acknowledged as an event that would entitle him to some merit in his Royal Highnesses eye, and desired your Petitioners to accompany him and the said Rebel prisoners to Inverness, which they did.

That your Petitioners were so successful that they were able to persuade 84 Rebels named Grant to surrender themselves and their weapons to Mr. Grant, who then acknowledged this with gratitude, seeing it as something that would give him some credit in his Royal Highness's eyes. He asked your Petitioners to join him and the Rebel prisoners on their way to Inverness, which they did.

That your Petitioners to their own, as well as the Neighbourhoods great surprise, were upon their Arrival at Inverness represented as Rebels and corresponding with those in open arms and as prisoners taken by him, and upon such false Information confined by his Royal Highness and have since been sent up prisoners without the least ground or charge but the false Information given by the said Mr. Grant.

That your Petitioners, much to their own and the Neighborhood's surprise, were labeled as Rebels upon their arrival in Inverness. They were accused of working with those in open rebellion and were claimed to be prisoners taken by him. Based on this false information, they were detained by his Royal Highness and have since been sent away as prisoners with no valid grounds or charges against them, just the misleading information provided by Mr. Grant.

That your Petitioners tho’ conscious of their own Innocence, and free from any guilt, have upon the said false Information been sent from Inverness to England and have in the course of the voyage been in no shape distinguished from those in open Rebellion, that from the great Hardships they have suffer’d, one of your Petitioners Alexander Grant near 70 years old, and a creditor by Mortgage for large sums of money upon the said Mr. Lewis Grant’s Estate, has been seized with and still lies ill of a Malignant Fever, and being, by Reason of his close confinement deprived of any assistance, is in danger of losing his Life whereby the said Mr. Lewis Grant’s sordid ends would be answered should this Petitioner die while under so heavy a charge as that of Treason.

That your Petitioners, while aware of their own innocence and free from any guilt, have been sent from Inverness to England based on false information. During the journey, they were treated no differently than those in outright rebellion. They have endured significant hardships, and one of your Petitioners, Alexander Grant, who is nearly 70 years old and a creditor by mortgage for substantial amounts on Mr. Lewis Grant’s estate, has been suffering from a severe fever and remains ill. Because of his strict confinement and lack of assistance, he is at risk of losing his life, which would serve Mr. Lewis Grant's selfish interests if this Petitioner were to die while facing such serious charges as treason.

Your Petitioners therefore humbly pray your Grace to take this their very hard case into consideration and admit them to liberty upon reasonable Bail to answer such charges as shall be brought against them, or, at least, to change their present Confinement into a more comfortable one with Liberty to an Agent to repair to them at seasonable Times, the better to enable them to manifest their Innocence, and the Falsehood and Malice of the Charge against them, when called to an open trial.

Your Petitioners respectfully ask your Grace to consider their difficult situation and allow them to be released on reasonable bail to respond to any charges that may be brought against them, or, at the very least, to change their current confinement to a more comfortable one with the ability for an agent to visit them at appropriate times, so they can better demonstrate their innocence and the falsehood and maliciousness of the charges against them when they go to trial.

And your Petitioners shall ever Pray

And your Petitioners will always request

[Pg 331]

[Pg 331]

Letter from Sir Dudley Ryder,[584] Attorney-General and the Hon. William Murray, [585] Solicitor-General to the Secretary of State.

Message from Sir Dudley Ryder, [584] Attorney-General and the Hon. Will Murray, [585] Solicitor-General to the Secretary of State.

To His Grace the Duke of Newcastle

To His Grace the Duke of Newcastle

May it please your Grace,—In obedience to his Majesty’s Commands signified to us by your Grace in your Letter of the 18th instant with which your Grace sent us the inclosed Examinations of James Grant and John Grant brought up Prisoners on suspition of having joined with or been assisting to the Rebells in Scotland and who are now in custody of a Messenger, together with several Petitions, Certificates and other Papers herewith also inclosed; and directing us to take the said papers into Consideration, and Report our Opinion what proceedings may be proper thereupon.

Your Highness,—In compliance with his Majesty’s instructions conveyed to us by your Grace in your letter dated the 18th of this month, which included the examinations of James Grant and John Grant, who have been taken as prisoners on suspicion of having joined or assisted the rebels in Scotland and are currently in the custody of a messenger, along with several petitions, certificates, and other documents enclosed herewith; and directing us to review these papers and report our opinion on the appropriate proceedings regarding them.

We have considered the same, and as some of the Papers mention the name of Ludovick Grant, Esqr, the Laird of Grant, as the person by whose means they were seized and Imprisoned, he being in Town, we thought it proper to give him notice of our Meeting to take the Papers into consideration. He was pleased to attend us[Pg 332] and laid several matters of a Treasonable nature to their Charge. But as all those matters came to the knowledge of Mr. Ludovick Grant by Information from others only; and none of them fell within his own personal knowledge, and as it is a considerable time since the Prisoners have applied to be discharged; and no Information has yet been given against either of them upon oath; and neither Mr. Sharpe,[586] of whom we have inquired, nor Mr. Ludovick Grant know of any witnesses now here who can charge them upon oath; and the Prisoners are not yet committed either for Treason or suspition of Treason, and most of the things objected to them are only triable in Scotland. We beg leave humbly to submit it as our Opinion, that it may be advisable to admit them to Bail for their Appearance, before the Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh, at the first sitting of the said Court, after the first of December next, there to answer such things as may be then laid to their charge; when there Will be an opportunity of Committing and trying them in case evidence shall appear sufficient for that purpose. We proposed to Mr. Ludovick Grant, the only person who has appeared before us as their Accuser that they should be Bailed for their appearance at Edinburgh, and he has told us that he has no objection to it but thought it might be proper.

We have considered this carefully, and since some of the documents mention Ludovick Grant, Esq., the Laird of Grant, as the person who facilitated their seizure and imprisonment, being in town, we thought it would be appropriate to inform him about our meeting to discuss the documents. He was kind enough to join us[Pg 332] and presented several accusations of treason against them. However, since all these accusations came to Mr. Ludovick Grant through information from others and not from his own direct knowledge, and considering it's been quite some time since the prisoners applied for release, and no sworn information has been provided against either of them yet; and neither Mr. Sharpe, [586] who we consulted, nor Mr. Ludovick Grant can identify any witnesses present who could testify against them under oath; and the prisoners have not been formally charged with treason or suspicion of treason, with most of the claims against them being only prosecutable in Scotland. We respectfully suggest that it may be wise to grant them bail for their appearance before the Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh at the first session of the Court after December 1st, to address any accusations that may be presented then; at which point there will be an opportunity to commit and try them if sufficient evidence emerges. We proposed to Mr. Ludovick Grant, the only person who has come forward as their accuser, that they should be granted bail for their appearance in Edinburgh, and he indicated that he had no objections but felt it might be the right course of action.

All which is most humbly submitted to your Grace’s Consideration.

All of this is respectfully submitted for your Grace’s consideration.

(Signed) D. Ryder.
W. Murray.

(Signed) D. Ryder.
W. Murray.

29th August 1746.

August 29, 1746.

[Pg 333]

[Pg 333]


[Pg 335]

[Pg 335]

A NARRATIVE OF SUNDRY SERVICES PERFORMED, TOGETHER WITH AN ACCOUNT OF MONEY DISPOSED IN THE SERVICE OF GOVERNMENT DURING THE LATE REBELLION BY WALTER GROSSETT

To the Right Honourable Lord Commissioners of His Majesty’s Treasury, The MEMORIAL of WALTER GROSSETT, Esqr.

To the Right Honorable Commissioners of His The Treasury, The MEMORIAL of WALTER GROSSETT, Esq.

Humbly sheweth

Humbly shows

That as your Lordships have been pleased to appoint the Report of Sr Everard Fawkener and Mr. Sharpe,[587] relating to the account of your Memorialist Services to the Government during the late Rebellion, to be read to-morrow, he humbly begs leave to refer thereto and to observe:—

That since your Lordships have chosen to appoint the Report of Sir Everard Fawkener and Mr. Sharpe,[587] regarding the account of your Memorialist's services to the Government during the recent Rebellion, he respectfully asks to refer to it and to note:—

That the Account above mentioned is Certify’d by the Lord Justice Clerk and all the Generals who Commanded in Scotland; and as several of the Services therein set forth were performed, by verbal as well as by written Orders he had the honour to receive from His Royal Highness the Duke while in Scotland, it was by his Royal Highness’s Directions that the said Account was above three years ago laid before your Lordships by Sr Everard Fawkener, and that the Report relating thereto is now signed by him.

That the Account mentioned above is certified by the Lord Justice Clerk and all the Generals who commanded in Scotland. Since several of the services listed were carried out based on both verbal and written orders he had the honor to receive from His Royal Highness the Duke while in Scotland, it was at His Royal Highness’s direction that the Account was submitted to your Lordships over three years ago by Sir Everard Fawkener, and that the related report is now signed by him.

That your Memorialist has not in that or any other Account charged anything for his Trouble or Loss of Time for upwards of four years, he has been employed in the Service of the Government as aforesaid and finding out and collecting the Evidences for the Crown against the Rebells assisting in carrying on the Prosecutions against them at London, York, and Carlisle, attending the Tryal of Provost Stuart at Edinburgh, finding Bills in Scotland against those who were excepted out of the Act of Indemnity and other Services.

That your Memorialist has not in that or any other Account charged anything for his trouble or loss of time for over four years, during which he has been working for the Government as mentioned, gathering and collecting evidence for the Crown against the Rebels, assisting in the prosecutions against them in London, York, and Carlisle, attending the trial of Provost Stuart in Edinburgh, and finding indictments in Scotland against those who were excluded from the Act of Indemnity, as well as providing other services.

That before the Rebellion your Memorialist as an officer[Pg 336] of the Revenue rendered greater service thereto than ever was done by any officer thereof in Scotland.

That before the Rebellion, your Memorialist, as an officer[Pg 336], provided more service to the Revenue than any other officer in Scotland had ever done.

That your Memorialists share of the Profits arising from the Condemnation of prohibited and uncustomed Goods seized by him the three years immediately preceding the Rebellion amounted to above £4000 and the Crowns to above double that sum; that the remarkable Part reacted for the Service of the Government, from the first Breaking out of the Rebellion, made the Rebells lay hold upon everything that belonged to him and amongst other Things upon the greatest part of the Goods so condemned as aforesaid, and by which he was (exclusive of his other losses by the Rebellion) a most considerable sufferer.

That the individuals submitting this memorial received a share of the profits from the confiscation of prohibited and untaxed goods seized by him during the three years leading up to the Rebellion, which totaled over £4000, and the crown’s share was more than double that amount. Additionally, the significant role he played in serving the Government since the Rebellion began caused the rebels to seize everything he owned, including a large portion of the condemned goods mentioned above, resulting in him suffering substantial losses due to the Rebellion, aside from his other losses.

That more Goods have been run in Scotland since the Rebellion than ever was done before in that Country in the same space of time.

That more goods have been brought into Scotland since the Rebellion than ever before in that country in the same amount of time.

That your Memorialist had several Informations relating thereto, but could not Profit thereby, by reason of the manner in which he has these four years past been employed, in the more Important Services to the Government before mentioned.

That your Memorialist has received several pieces of information regarding this matter but was unable to benefit from them due to the way he has been occupied for the past four years in the more important services to the Government mentioned earlier.

That few would have undertaken these services by reason of the apparent Hazard and other fatal Consequences, with which they were likely to be attended, and which he has in many Instances felt.

That few would have taken on these tasks because of the obvious dangers and other deadly consequences that were likely to accompany them, and which he has experienced in many cases.

That your Memorialists wife who died of the Cruel usage she met with from the Rebells, certfy’d as above, has left him four Children to provide for.

That your Memorialist's wife, who died from the cruel treatment she received from the Rebels, has left him four children to take care of.

That your Memorialists younger brother Captain Grosset who was barbarously murdered by the Rebells,[588] and whose remarkable services during the Rebellion are[Pg 337] well known to all the Generals who commanded in Scotland, as well as to his Royal Highness the Duke, has left a widow and five children to whose support your Memorialist is obliged to contribute.

That your Memorialist's younger brother, Captain Grosset, was brutally murdered by the Rebels, and his extraordinary service during the Rebellion is well known to all the Generals who commanded in Scotland, as well as to His Royal Highness the Duke. He has left behind a widow and five children, for whom your Memorialist is required to provide support.

That the Insults and insufferable ill usage which they as well as his own Children daily met with in Scotland, has obliged him to bring them all to England, and who are thereby in effect banished their Country for their Father’s faithful Services to the Government.

That the insults and unbearable mistreatment they and his own children faced daily in Scotland forced him to bring them all to England, effectively banishing them from their country due to their father’s loyal service to the government.

That the Expenses your Memorialist has been and is thereby put to, and by false and scandalous Libells and groundless and vexatious Lawsuits, on account of the Services before mentioned, not only far exceeds the one half of the Profits of the Commission in which he is joined with Sir John Shaw[589] (and which is the only mark of favour he has met with for his services, losses, and sufferings as aforesaid) but of his estate which is considerably lessened thereby and his other Losses by the Rebellion.

That the expenses your Memorialist has incurred and continues to incur due to false and defamatory statements and baseless, annoying lawsuits, related to the aforementioned services, not only far exceed half of the profits from the commission he shares with Sir John Shaw[589] (which is the only recognition he has received for his services, losses, and hardships as previously mentioned) but also significantly reduce his estate and his other losses from the rebellion.

Upon the whole if your Memorialist is turned out of the Employment above mentioned, before he is other wise suitably provided for, it will in place of rewarding the important services certified as above, be punishing him in the severest manner Especially as by the wording of the Warrant by which he is to be turned out of that Commission (if that Warrant is allowed to take place) your Memorialist must unjustly be recorded as one unworthy to be continued in that Employment, which is doing all that can be done to ruin him and his Family, and must be attended with worse consequences to them, than if the Rebells had succeeded in the many attempts they made to deprive him of his Life, as they did in taking away his Brothers; or if he had suffered along with the[Pg 338] Rebell Peers and others, who could not have been condemned if it had not been for the Evidences he procured against them; Many of whose families and even those who were most active in the Rebellion, enjoy at this Time more of their Estates and Fortunes than he does of his, in proportion to the respective amounts thereof, before the Rebellion, and are themselves caressed and esteemed, whilst your Memorialist and his Family, and that of his unfortunate Brother, are daily harassed, affronted and cruelly persecuted by the Influence of that Party without being Protected, supported, or properly Countenanced by that Government to whom we rendered so many real services, and on which account we are so great sufferers.

If your Memorialist is removed from the job mentioned above before he is otherwise properly taken care of, it will instead punish him severely instead of rewarding the important services acknowledged above. Especially since the wording of the Warrant under which he is to be dismissed (if that Warrant is allowed to go forward) must unjustly mark your Memorialist as unworthy of continuing in that job, which is ruining him and his family. The consequences for them would be worse than if the Rebels had succeeded in their many attempts to take his life, as they did with his brothers, or if he had suffered along with the [Pg 338] Rebel Peers and others, who could not have been condemned if it weren’t for the evidence he gathered against them. Many of their families, even those who were most involved in the Rebellion, are currently enjoying more of their estates and fortunes than he is of his, relative to what they had before the Rebellion, and are themselves celebrated and respected. Meanwhile, your Memorialist and his family, along with that of his unfortunate brother, are constantly harassed, insulted, and cruelly persecuted by the influence of that party without being protected, supported, or properly recognized by the government to which we provided so many genuine services, and for which we are such great sufferers.

All which is humbly submitted, etc., etc.

All of this is respectfully submitted, etc., etc.

[Endorsed.—Mr. Grossetts Memorial relating to the Report of S^r Everard Fawkener and Mr. Sharpe upon the account of his Services to the Government.]

[Endorsed.—Mr. Grossetts Memorial regarding the Report of Sir Everard Fawkener and Mr. Sharpe on the account of his Services to the Government.]

Note.—In the Record Office there are two documents, one entitled, ‘A NARRATIVE of Sundry Services performed by Walter Grossett, Esqr., during the course of the Rebellion, etc.’ which is countersigned as true by the Earl of Home and Generals Hawley, Handasyde, Guest, and Cope. The other is entitled ‘An ACCOUNT of Money,’ etc., and is certified by Andrew Fletcher, Lord Justice-Clerk. The Narrative’ is repeated in the ‘Account’ with only slight variations, so that there is no necessity to print both documents, and the ‘Account’ only is given here. Passages which appear in the ‘Narrative’ but have been omitted in the ‘Account’ are replaced here within square brackets.

Note.—In the Record Office, there are two documents: one titled "A NARRATIVE of Various Services performed by Walter Grossett, Esqr., throughout the Rebellion, etc.," which is verified as true by the Earl of Home and Generals Hawley, Handasyde, Guest, and Cope. The other is titled "An ACCOUNT of Money," etc., and is certified by Andrew Fletcher, Lord Justice-Clerk. The "Narrative" is included in the "Account" with only slight differences, so it's unnecessary to print both documents; only the "Account" is provided here. Any passages that appear in the "Narrative" but have been omitted in the "Account" are replaced here within square brackets.


[Pg 339]

[Pg 339]

An ACCOUNT of Money disposed by WALTER GROSETT, Esqr., in the Service of the Government during the late Revolt, upon Particular Occasions and by Directions hereafter mentioned.

The Rebells upon their arrival at Perth, having formed a Scheme of surprizing the Town of Edingburgh by crossing the River Forth in Boats and Vessells as they had done in the year 1715: Mr. Grosett as a Justice of the Peace, did by direction of the Lord Advocate[590] of the 3rd and 9th September 1745 with the assistance of the Constables and Tide Surveyors, Kings Boats and Crews stationed at Dunbar, Kirkaldy, Leith, Queens Ferry, Borrostouness and Alloa, who by order of the Board of Customs were put under Mr. Grosett’s Directions, Remove all Ships, Boats and vessells from the North side of the Forth to the Harbours of Dunbar, Leith, Queen’s Ferry, and Borrostouness, on the south side of the said River [in so effectual a manner that the Rebells after various attempts, finding themselves disappointed in their Designs were obliged to march their army from Perth round the Heads of the Forth and cross that River at a Ford some Miles above Stirling which gave time to the Kings Troops under Sir John Cope to return from Inverness to the Relief of Edinburgh, had not that Town been shamefully given up to the Rebells.]

The Rebels, upon arriving in Perth, created a plan to surprise the city of Edinburgh by crossing the River Forth in boats and vessels, just as they had done in 1715. Mr. Grosett, as a Justice of the Peace, acted on the orders of the Lord Advocate[590] from September 3rd and 9th, 1745. With the help of constables and tide surveyors, as well as the King’s boats and crews stationed at Dunbar, Kirkaldy, Leith, Queen's Ferry, Borrostouness, and Alloa, who were appointed under Mr. Grosett’s direction by order of the Customs Board, he managed to remove all ships, boats, and vessels from the north side of the Forth to the harbors of Dunbar, Leith, Queen's Ferry, and Borrostouness on the south side of the river. This was done so effectively that after various attempts, the Rebels found themselves thwarted in their plans and had to march their army from Perth around the heads of the Forth and cross the river at a ford several miles above Stirling. This delay allowed the King’s troops under Sir John Cope to return from Inverness to relieve Edinburgh, if only the city hadn’t been shamefully surrendered to the Rebels.

£ s. d.
No. 1
Expended on this Service to the Crews of the King’s Boats and others who were employed Night and Day therein for ten Days and for Intelligence of the Motions of the Rebells and other Expences
29 10 0

[Pg 340] The Rebells having upon the 13th of Septemr. crossed the Forth at a Ford some miles above Sterling; Mr. Grosett by Direction of Lord Justice Clarke removed the Ships and Vessells from the Harbours of Borristounness and Queen’s Ferry, on the south side of the River, to prevent the Cannon, Arms and Amunition on Board of these Sloops and Vessells from falling into the hands of the Rebells to prevent their having any communication with the North side of the River Forth otherwise than by going round the Way they came, and which Mr. Grosett did, though the Rebells had at this time by an advance party taken Possession of the Town of Borristouness, about 12 miles to the West of Edinburgh; Upon Mr. Grosett’s return to Edinburgh, upon Sunday the 15th in the Evening he found General Fowke,[591] who was just arrived from England with Lord Justice Clarke, together with General Guest, and who approved of what Mr. Grosett had done, and sent him with Orders to Colonel Gardiner, to remain that Night with the Troops at Coltbridge, about a Mile to the West of the Town.

[Pg 340] The Rebels crossed the Forth on September 13th at a ford located a few miles above Stirling. Mr. Grosett, following the orders of Lord Justice Clarke, removed the ships and vessels from the harbors of Borristounness and Queen's Ferry, on the south side of the river, to prevent the cannons, arms, and ammunition on board from falling into the hands of the Rebels. This move was to stop any communication with the north side of the River Forth, except by going back the way they came, which Mr. Grosett successfully executed, even though at that time the Rebels had sent an advance party to take control of the town of Borristounness, about 12 miles west of Edinburgh. When Mr. Grosett returned to Edinburgh on Sunday evening the 15th, he found General Fowke, who had just arrived from England with Lord Justice Clarke, along with General Guest. They approved of Mr. Grosett’s actions and instructed him to send orders to Colonel Gardiner to stay with the troops at Coltbridge that night, about a mile west of the town.

No. 2
Expended in this service
7 12 0

[Pg 341] Upon the 16th of September Mr. Grosett was sent out twice in the morning to get Intelligence of the Motions of the Rebells, and to let General Fowkes, who was then posted at Coltbridge, know their Motions, and the last Account he brought was that the Rebells had lain down upon their Arms, about Twelve that Day near Kirklisten, about 6 Miles to the West of Edinburgh, that the Dragoons having soon after this upon the motion of the Rebells towards them quit their Post at Coltbridge and retired in some haste by the North side of the Town about 3 that afternoon, without sending the Party of Dragoons into the Town as had been conserted in the morning of that Day, and Lord Justice Clarke observing that this might give a Handle for justifying the Provest to give up the Town to the Rebells, he sent Mr. Grosett to the Provest, to press the Defence of the Town, and to assure him, that as many of the Dragoons as he pleased to desire should forthwith be sent in, to assist in the Defence thereof, till Sir John Cope, who was then hourly expected by sea from Aberdeen, should come with the Troops to their Relief. But the Provost, declining to defend the Town upon Pretence of the Uncertainty of Sir John Cope’s coming in time to their Assistance, Mr. Grosett returned and acquainted Lord Chief Justice Clarke thereof; and as by this time an Express was arrived from Dunbar with Letters for Lord Justice Clarke, giving an Account of the Arrival of the Troops under Sir John Cope[Pg 342] off Dunbar; Mr. Grosett was the only Person who would undertake to go back into the Town with these Letters; but not being able to prevail with the Provost to agree to the Defence thereof, he left it about One in the Morning, and brought Lord Justice Clarke an Account of what had past [narrowly escaped falling into the Hands of the Rebells, who by 5 in the Morning were in full Possession of the Town, the Gates having been opened to them; But the Particulars of Mr. Grosetts Transactions, and the Provosts Behaviour at this Juncture, will more fully appear from a Narrative relating thereto, formerly delivered by Mr. Grosett to His Grace the Duke of Newcastle.[592]]

[Pg 341] On September 16th, Mr. Grosett was sent out twice in the morning to gather information on the movements of the rebels and to update General Fowkes, who was stationed at Coltbridge, about their actions. The last update he brought was that the rebels had laid down their arms around noon that day near Kirklisten, about six miles west of Edinburgh. Shortly after this, as the rebels moved toward them, the Dragoons abandoned their post at Coltbridge and hastily retreated north of the town around 3 PM, without sending a contingent of Dragoons into the town as planned earlier that day. Lord Justice Clarke noted that this could provide a justification for the Provost to surrender the town to the rebels, so he sent Mr. Grosett to urge the Provost to defend the town, assuring him that as many Dragoons as he needed would be sent immediately to assist in its defense until Sir John Cope, who was expected to arrive by sea from Aberdeen, could bring in the troops for their relief. However, the Provost declined to defend the town, citing uncertainty about whether Sir John Cope would arrive in time to help. Mr. Grosett returned to inform Lord Chief Justice Clarke of the Provost's decision. By this time, an express had arrived from Dunbar with letters for Lord Justice Clarke, reporting that the troops under Sir John Cope had arrived off Dunbar. Mr. Grosett was the only person willing to go back into the town with these letters; but since he couldn't persuade the Provost to agree to defend the town, he left around 1 AM and brought Lord Justice Clarke an account of what had occurred, narrowly escaping falling into the hands of the rebels, who were in full control of the town by 5 AM, as the gates had been opened to them. The details of Mr. Grosett's actions and the Provost's behavior during this time will be more fully revealed in a narrative previously delivered by Mr. Grosett to His Grace the Duke of Newcastle. [592]

No. 3

Expended and Lost in this Service, Mr. Grosett in his speedy Return to Edinburgh having lost both his Hatt and Wig and killed one of his Horses

Expended and Lost in this Service, Mr. Grosett, on his quick return to Edinburgh, lost both his hat and wig and ended up killing one of his horses.

16 17 0
Sept. 1745

Mr. Grosett having retired with Lord Justice Clarke to Dunbar, and his Lordship having upon the 18th Septemr. received Information that the young Pretender was to be that Night with some of the Chiefs of his Party at the Dutchess of Gordon’s house,[593] about 7 miles to the South-East of Edinburgh on their Road to England, and that the First Column of the Rebell Army was to march that way, Mr. Grosett was sent by [Pg 343] Lord Justice Clarke with proper Guides and Assistants in the Night to reconnoitre and send certain Intelligence of their Motions and number; But receiving Information near the Dutchess of Gordon’s House, that they had changed their Resolution he returned and acquainted Lord Justice Clarke thereof; From this time to the Battle of Preston, Mr. Grosett was employed in reconnoitering and procuring Intelligence of the Motions and Designs of the Rebells [narrowly escaped being killed the Night before the Battle, by a Party of the Rebells who lay in ambuscade in a Thicket of Wood on the side of a hollow way, Mr. Grosett had to pass through in going by the Directions of Sir John Cope to observe their motions and numbers, as they were drawing up in front of our army from whence they fired close upon him, as he went along, and from which Place they were drove by our Cañon after Mr. Grosett’s return with an Account of their Situation]; and the Day of the Battle he Lost a Horse and all his Baggage, the servant who had charge thereof being made Prisoner by the Rebells.

Mr. Grosett had gone to Dunbar with Lord Justice Clarke, who on September 18th received information that the young Pretender was to be that night at the Duchess of Gordon’s house, about 7 miles southeast of Edinburgh, along their route to England, and that the first column of the rebel army was headed that way. Mr. Grosett was sent by Lord Justice Clarke with appropriate guides and assistants at night to scout and report back on their movements and numbers. However, upon learning near the Duchess of Gordon’s house that they had changed their plans, he returned to inform Lord Justice Clarke. From that point until the Battle of Preston, Mr. Grosett was tasked with scouting and gathering intelligence on the rebels' movements and strategies. He narrowly escaped being killed the night before the battle by a group of rebels who lay in ambush in a thicket next to a hollow way that Mr. Grosett had to pass through while following Sir John Cope’s directions to observe their movements and numbers. As they were forming in front of our army, they fired closely at him as he went by, but they were driven off by our cannon after Mr. Grosett returned with a report of their situation. On the day of the battle, he lost a horse and all his baggage, as the servant in charge of it was captured by the rebels.

No. 4
Expended and lost in this Service
33 6 0
Sept. and Oct. 1745

After the Battle of Preston Mr. Grosett went from place to place to receive Information and Intelligence of the Motions and Proceedings of the Rebells and so soon as he heard of General Handasyde’s commanding at Berwick sent his brother Captain Grosett, who was Aid-de-Camp to the General, the[Pg 344] Intelligence he from time to time procured of the Motions, and Designs of the Rebells, and amongst other services brought Prisoner to Edinburgh Castle with the assistance of Mr. Brown and some Farmers, Spalding of Whitefield[594] one of the Chiefs of the Rebells, with Two others, who were secured as they were returning, thro’ the West of Scotland from the Rebell Army near Carlisle to the North, in order to bring up about 3000 men more from that Country, and for which purpose he had written Orders from Mr. Murray, the young Pretenders Secretary, Duke of Perth, Lord George Murray, and others of the Rebell chiefs: As also the particular Route they were to take with these men until they should join the Rebell Army, who were to halt for them at Carlisle. All which Orders, Route and other Letters and Papers found upon Whitefield and his servant were delivered over with them to General Guest, then in the Castle of Edinburgh.

After the Battle of Preston, Mr. Grosett traveled from place to place to gather information about the movements and activities of the rebels. As soon as he learned that General Handasyde was in charge at Berwick, he sent his brother, Captain Grosett, who was the General's aide-de-camp, the[Pg 344] intelligence he had collected about the rebels' plans and movements. Among other duties, he helped capture Spalding of Whitefield[594], one of the rebel leaders, along with two others. They were apprehended while returning through the West of Scotland from the rebel army near Carlisle to the north, as they aimed to recruit about 3,000 more men from that area. For this purpose, he had received written orders from Mr. Murray, the young Pretender's secretary, Duke of Perth, Lord George Murray, and other rebel leaders. The orders detailed the specific route they were to take with these men until they met the rebel army, which was supposed to wait for them at Carlisle. All these orders, the route information, and other letters and documents found on Whitefield and his servant were handed over to General Guest, who was then at Edinburgh Castle.

No. 5
Expended in this Service
24 8 0
Nov.

Upon the 13th Novemr. Mr. Grosett met Lord Justice Clarke at Musselburrow, and[Pg 345] returned with his Lordship to Edinburgh,[595] and the Day after General Handasyde[596] arrived there with two Regiments of Foot and the Remains of Hamilton’s and Gardiner’s Dragoons; That the Castle of Edinburgh being at this time in great want of Provisions of all sorts Mr. Grosett by order of General Handasyde of the 16th Novemr. procured and laid in a sufficient supply thereof not only for the Garrison but for the Troops, that should be employd in the Defence of the Town.

On November 13th, Mr. Grosett met Lord Justice Clarke at Musselburgh and[Pg 345] returned with him to Edinburgh. The next day, General Handasyde arrived there with two regiments of foot and the remnants of Hamilton’s and Gardiner’s dragoons. At that time, Edinburgh Castle was in desperate need of provisions of all kinds. By order of General Handasyde on November 16th, Mr. Grosett arranged to procure and stock enough supplies not only for the garrison but also for the troops that would be employed in the defense of the town.

No. 6
Expended in this Service
5 11 0

About this time the Rebells at Perth who were about 3000 in number being reinforced by the Landing of Troops in the North, with Cannon and Stores from France; Therefore in order to prevent the Kings Troops from being surprized, and the Town of Edinburgh falling again into the hands of the Rebells, [Pg 346] Mr. Grosett by Direction of Lord Justice Clarke, and Orders from General Handasyde of the 26th and 27th November 1745,[597] went with proper Assistance and removed all the Boats and Vessells that were at that time to be found at the different Ports and Creeks on the Northside of the River Forth, between Kinghorn and Aloa, to the Southside thereof.

Around this time, the rebels in Perth, who numbered about 3,000, were bolstered by the arrival of troops in the North along with cannon and supplies from France. To prevent the King's troops from being caught off guard and to stop the city of Edinburgh from falling back into the hands of the rebels, [Pg 346] Mr. Grosett, under the direction of Lord Justice Clarke and orders from General Handasyde dated November 26 and 27, 1745,[597] gathered the appropriate support and moved all the boats and vessels found at various ports and creeks on the North side of the River Forth, from Kinghorn to Alloa, to the South side.

No. 7
Expended in this Service
11 10 0

[Mr. Grosett at this time recovered seized Goods to the value of £1800 which the Rebells had carry’d off from the Kings Warehouse at Leith, and in which he was greatly assisted by Genl. Handasyde.]

[Mr. Grosett at this time recovered seized goods worth £1800 that the rebels had taken from the King's warehouse at Leith, and he was greatly assisted by General Handasyde.]

When the Rebells came to Edinburgh there were of seized and condemned Goods, in the King’s Warehouse at Leith, to the Value of about Ten Thousand Pounds, and as these Goods were all carry’d off by the assistance of the Rebells, and Mr. Legrand Collector at Leith having upon their approach left Scotland, Mr. Grosett at this time saved no Labour or Expense to get Information by whom these Goods had been carried off, and where lodged, found out and secured with the assistance of a Company of the Military which he procured from General Handasyde, as many of these Goods as were sold for about £1500 and procured Information of the Names of the Persons who with the assistance of the Rebells carried these and the greatest part of the other Goods from [Pg 347] the Kings Warehouse, and who are now under Prosecution for that offence, as well as for the value of the Goods, that Mr. Grosett did not recover.

When the rebels came to Edinburgh, there were seized and condemned goods in the King’s Warehouse at Leith worth about ten thousand pounds. Since these goods were all taken away with the help of the rebels, and Mr. Legrand, the collector at Leith, had left Scotland upon their arrival, Mr. Grosett made every effort to find out who had taken these goods and where they were stored. With the support of a military company he got from General Handasyde, he managed to recover as many of these goods as were sold for around £1500 and gathered information about the names of the individuals who, with the rebels' help, took these and most of the other goods from the King’s Warehouse. They are currently facing prosecution for that offense, as well as for the value of the goods that Mr. Grosett did not recover. [Pg 347]

No. 8
Expended in this Service
68 14 0
Dec. 1745

That after the Removal of the Boats and Vessells as above others having arrived, and some of those that had been removed gone back, and that it was found absolutely necessary for the Service, that all Boats, Ships, and Vessells whatsoever on the North Coast betwixt Kinghorn and St. Andrews down the River as well as those formerly ordered to be removed betwixt Kinghorn and Alloa up the River should be removed to prevent the Rebells from getting across with their Cannon, and as this cou’d not be done without the assistance of some Ship of Force to secure a Retreat in case of being surprized by the Rebells who were in possession of that Part of the Country; and as the Captain of the Milford Man of War was ordered to concert proper measures with and assist Mr. Grosett therein; Mr. Grosett by Order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest the 8th Decemr. 1745 went with the Custom House Boats and other proper Assistance and performed what was required above.

That after the removal of the boats and vessels mentioned earlier, others arrived, and some of those that had been removed returned. It became absolutely necessary for the operation that all boats, ships, and vessels on the North Coast between Kinghorn and St. Andrews, as well as those previously ordered to be removed between Kinghorn and Alloa up the river, should be relocated to prevent the rebels from crossing with their cannons. This could not be done without the help of a warship to secure a retreat in case we were surprised by the rebels who were occupying that part of the country. The captain of the Milford Man of War was ordered to coordinate and assist Mr. Grosett in this matter. By order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest on December 8, 1745, Mr. Grosett went with the Custom House boats and other appropriate assistance and carried out the required actions.

No. 9
Expended in this Service for Intelligence
6 10 0
Dec. 1745

Mr. Grosett by Warrant of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest[598] of the 16th Decemr. 1745 removed with the Assistance of the[Pg 348] Kings Boats and Happy Janet armed Vessell, all the Boats and Vessells at the Creeks on the South side of the Forth betwixt Borristouness and Sterling to the Harbour of Borristouness to prevent their being forced from these Places by the Rebells. As also from Alloa a Quantity of large Loggs of Wood and long Planks to prevent the Rebells making Floats thereof to cross with their Cannon at Alloa, with which they proposed to attack Sterling Castle.

Mr. Grosett, under the authority of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest, on December 16, 1745, was removed with the help of the Kings Boats and the armed vessel Happy Janet, along with all the boats and vessels at the creeks on the south side of the Forth between Borristouness and Stirling, to the Harbour of Borristouness to prevent these from being taken by the rebels. Additionally, from Alloa, a quantity of large logs and long planks was removed to stop the rebels from making rafts to cross with their cannon at Alloa, which they planned to use to attack Stirling Castle.

No. 10
Expended in this Service
22 9 0
Dec. 1745

Lord Justice Clarke having received Intelligence that the Rebells from the North were to force their Passage across the River Forth at Haigens and Carsy Nooks in flat bottomed Boats they were bringing over Land from the Water of Earn, to prevent which Mr. Grosett by Directions of his Lordship the 19th Decemr. 1745[599] went and got that Part of Sterling Shire which lies next to the River put in arms to defend the Banks thereof, and by Order of General Guest of the same Date engaged and stationed the Pretty Janet armed Vessell with proper Hands, which he procured at Borristouness to defend the Passage at Haigen’s Nook and the Jean armed Sloop that at Carsey Nook which effectually prevented the Designs of the Rebells at this Juncture.

Lord Justice Clarke received information that the rebels from the North planned to cross the River Forth at Haigens and Carsy Nooks using flat-bottomed boats they were transporting overland from the Water of Earn. To prevent this, Mr. Grosett, following his Lordship's orders on December 19, 1745, organized the part of Stirling Shire adjacent to the river for defense. By order of General Guest on the same date, he secured and stationed the armed vessel Pretty Janet with a proper crew, which he obtained at Borristouness to defend the passage at Haigen’s Nook, and the armed sloop Jean at Carsey Nook. This effectively thwarted the rebels' plans at that time.

No. 11
Expended in this Service
17 4 0
Dec. 1745

To prevent the Rebells, upon their crossing the River Esk in their Return from England [Pg 349] into Scotland, having it in their Power to secure a ready communication between them and their friends in the North, and to get from thence the Cannon and other Military Stores that had been landed there by the French; Mr. Grosett by order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest of the 21st December 1745[600] was directed instantly to remove all Vessells and Boats of whatever Size out of the Harbours of Borristouness, Queens Ferry or any where else upon the South Coast of the Forth to such Places as he should think most proper for his Majesty’s Service at so critical a juncture and who accordingly removed all Boats and Vessells whatever that could be floated [to the Roads of Queens Ferry and Borristouness under the command of the armed vessells lying there, which effectually frustrated the Designs of the Rebells.]

To prevent the Rebels, when they crossed the River Esk on their return from England [Pg 349] into Scotland, from being able to easily communicate with their allies in the North and to receive the cannons and other military supplies that had been brought there by the French, Mr. Grosett was ordered by Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest on December 21, 1745, to immediately move all vessels and boats of any size out of the harbors of Borristouness, Queens Ferry, or anywhere else along the South Coast of the Forth to locations he deemed most suitable for his Majesty’s service at such a critical time. He successfully moved all boats and vessels that could be floated [to the roads of Queens Ferry and Borristouness under the command of the armed vessels stationed there, which effectively thwarted the Rebels' plans.]

Expended in this Service 8 6 0

Expended in forwarding from Borristouness Powder, Ball, Grape Shot, and other ammunition sent thither from the Castle of Edinburgh for the use of the Castle of Sterling: Pretty Janet armed Vessell stationed at Haigens Nook and the Jean armed Sloop at Carsy Nook to prevent the Rebells crossing at these Ferries by order of General Guest of 22nd Decemr 1745[601]

Expended in shipping from Borristouness powder, ball, grape shot, and other ammunition sent from the Castle of Edinburgh for the use of the Castle of Sterling: Pretty Janet, an armed vessel stationed at Haigens Nook, and the Jean, an armed sloop at Carsy Nook, to stop the rebels from crossing at these ferries by order of General Guest on December 22, 1745. [601]

3 12 0

Upon the Return of the Rebells from England to Scotland Orders being given to the two Regiments of Foot Prices and Ligoniers, [Pg 350] and to the Glasgow Regiment and three Paisly Companies,[602] to march from Sterling to Edinburgh for the Defence of that Place, Intelligence being then received that the Rebells were at Moffat, in their Road to Edinburgh which City was at this time (by the Retreat of the two Regiments of Dragoons from thence to Haddington in their way to Berwick) left without any other Force but the Edinburgh Regiment[603] and as it was probable, that the Rebells might in this situation attempt to intercept the Troops in their March from Sterling to Edinburgh; Mr. Grosett was Dispatched, with Orders from Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest[604] for hireing and pressing a number of Boats and Ships, for embarking if necessary the Troops at Borristouness, at which place they were expected from Sterling that night; that Provisions should be laid in for Berwick but that they should stop at Leith Road for Orders. Mr. Grosett having agreeable to these Directions saved no Expense and Labour in a service of so much Importance [Pg 351] had Ships and Boats at Borristouness for embarking and transporting the Troops by the time they came there which was about Twelve at Night. By these means the Troops and the Glasgow and Paisly Militia, about a Thousand in Number, who unable to continue their march being embarked at Borristouness with the Baggage belonging to the whole. They arrived on the morning of the 24th Decemr. in the Road of Leith much about the Time that the other Troops, who were forwarded by Horses from Linlithgow, arrived at Edinburgh; and who upon their Arrival at Leith were ordered to disembark there, and by that Means and the Number of Volunteers One Thousand and upwards whom Lord Justice Clarke got to take up Arms in the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh, and march immediately into the Town. The Rebells being deterred from coming forward to Edinburgh took the Road to Glasgow, where they arrived the 25th Decemr. 1745.

Upon the Return of the Rebels from England to Scotland, orders were given to the two Foot Regiments, Prices and Ligonier's, [Pg 350] as well as the Glasgow Regiment and three Paisley Companies, to march from Sterling to Edinburgh to defend the city. News was received that the Rebels were at Moffat, on their way to Edinburgh, which at that time was left with no other force except the Edinburgh Regiment due to the retreat of the two Dragoon Regiments to Haddington en route to Berwick. It was likely that the Rebels might try to intercept the troops marching from Sterling to Edinburgh. Mr. Grosett was dispatched with orders from Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest to hire and gather a number of boats and ships for the potential embarkation of the troops at Borristouness, where they were expected from Sterling that night. Provisions were to be arranged for Berwick, but the troops were to hold at Leith Road for further instructions. Mr. Grosett, following these directions, spared no expense or effort in this important task, having ships and boats ready at Borristouness for the troops, who arrived there around midnight. With this plan, the troops and the Glasgow and Paisley militia, totaling about a thousand men, who could not continue their march, were embarked at Borristouness along with their baggage. They reached Leith Road on the morning of December 24th, around the same time that the other troops, who were forwarded by horse from Linlithgow, arrived in Edinburgh. Upon their arrival at Leith, they were ordered to disembark there, and through this, along with the number of volunteers—over a thousand—whom Lord Justice Clarke had gathered to take up arms in the Edinburgh area and march into the town immediately, the Rebels were deterred from advancing toward Edinburgh and instead took the road to Glasgow, arriving there on December 25th, 1745.

To forward this Service Mr. Grosett got from General Guest 100 gunners and expended therein 74 8 0

To Charges sending from Borrostownness and destroying two Boats by Order of Lord Home 23d Decemr. 1745[605] which the Friends of the Rebells had got privately concealed, and made use of for carrying Intelligence, and Dispatches to and from their friends on the opposite side of the Forth the one at Newton Pow and the other at Carron Water

To Charges sending from Borrostownness and destroying two boats by order of Lord Home on December 23, 1745, which the supporters of the rebels had secretly hidden and used to carry information and messages to and from their allies on the other side of the Forth: one at Newton Pow and the other at Carron Water.

2 16 0
[Pg 352]
Dec. 1745

The Castle of Edinburgh being at this time crowded with a great Number of Prisoners, and particularly with those taken by Captain Hanway of the Milford Man of War, near Montrose, on Board the Lewis a French Transport from Dunkirk;[606] and as the keeping them there was looked upon to be at this time dangerous Mr. Grosett by Order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest hired to Transports and shipt off these with other Prisoners at Leith for Berwick the 26th Decemr. 1745 with a Company of Foot on Board each Transport as a Guard.

The Castle of Edinburgh was at this time overcrowded with a large number of prisoners, especially those captured by Captain Hanway of the Milford warship near Montrose, who were on board the Lewis, a French transport from Dunkirk; [606] and since keeping them there was deemed risky at this time, Mr. Grosett, by order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Guest, arranged for transports and shipped these along with other prisoners from Leith to Berwick on December 26, 1745, with a company of foot soldiers on board each transport as guards.

No. 16
Expended in this Service
6 4 0
Jan. 7, 1745-6

Lord Justice Clarke having received Intelligence that the Rebells at Glasgow, being reinforced by their Friends from the North were preparing to March from that to attack Edinburgh Mr. Grosett was thereupon sent with a Warrant from his Lordship and from General Guest of the 1st Janry.[607] to take and bring from Borristowness or from on Board the Shipping lying in the Road of that Place all the Cannon he could meet with to be placed upon the Walls of the City of Edinburgh for the Defence thereof. The Rebells upon their going into England, having carried off or destroyed all the Cannon that were formerly placed there for that purpose: Mr. [Pg 353] Grosett went accordingly and provided them, and brought them in a vessell to Leith; But the Troops under General Hawley[608] arriving by this time at Edinburgh, it was then not thought necessary to bring them to that Place.

Lord Justice Clarke received word that the rebels in Glasgow, having been reinforced by their allies from the North, were getting ready to march to attack Edinburgh. Mr. Grosett was then sent with a warrant from his Lordship and General Guest of the 1st January to seize and transport any cannon he could find from Borristowness or from the ships anchored in that area to be placed on the walls of Edinburgh for its defense. The rebels, in their move into England, had taken or destroyed all the cannon that had previously been positioned there for this purpose. Mr. Grosett followed through and secured them, transporting them in a vessel to Leith. However, by the time the troops under General Hawley arrived in Edinburgh, it was decided that it was no longer necessary to bring the cannon to the city.

No. 17
Expended in this Service
12 13 0
Jan. 1745-6

Lord Justice Clarke having received certain Intelligence,[609] that the Rebells were erecting considerable Magazines at Alloa and that they proposed bringing their Cannon to that Place, as the most convenient for getting them across the River Forth, in order to their laying siege to Sterling Castle; His Lordship acquainted Generals Hawley and Husk thereof and Scheme was thereupon formed for getting Possession of their Cannon or at least retarding their getting them across the River, till the General should be ready to march with the Army to the Relief of Sterling; In Order thereto two Sloops of War were sent up the River, and Transports got ready by Mr. Grosett, to take on Board Troops at Leith, [where a Regiment lay ready to be embarked upon an hours warning]. Matters having been thus prepared, and Lord Justice Clarke having [Pg 354] saved no expence in procuring Intelligence had twice a day at least certain Accounts from Alloa and other Places in that Neighbourhood giving the whole Proceedings of the Rebells and having early in the Morning upon the 8th of Janry. ‘received sure Information that Lord John Drummond and Lord George Murray with the whole of the Cannon, with which the Rebells proposed to attack Sterling Castle were to be that Night at Alloa escorted only by about 200[610] of the Rebells they being under no apprehensions of meeting with any Disturbance on that side of the River, the Bridge of Sterling being Cut and the Rebell Army betwixt them and the Kings Troops; His Lordship and General Husk came thereupon to Leith and got 300 of the Troops that lay there immediately embarked on this Expedition to be commanded by Colonel Leighton,[611] and conducted by Mr. Grosett. As the Rebells at Alloa could have no Intelligence of their Designs, the Passage across the Forth, being for some time before this stopt everywhere, and as the Wind when they sailed proved favourable they thought themselves sure of surprizing the Rebells that Night at Alloa. But as by the time they had got one third of the way thither, the Wind turned flat against them it was one o’clock next Day before they got to Hegins Nook three Miles below Alloa and where they were [Pg 355] stopt from proceeding farther by the Ebbing of the Tide. Upon their Arrival there Mr. Grosett having received Intelligence from Alloa that the Rebells were shipping their cannon on Board of a Vessell, with a Design to proceed in the Night, and to land them on the opposite side of the River about two Miles above that Place so soon as the Tide would admitt of the Vessell’s floating and Sailing from that Harbour; and as Mr. Grosett was perfectly well acquainted with the River and every Corner of the Country, to prevent this, Fifty Soldiers and as many armed Sailors were put on board one large and two smaller Boats with orders to pass privately in the Night to the Rebells Batteries at Elphinstone and Alloa and lye at a Place appointed about a mile above Alloa, where the Vessell with the Cannon was to pass, and where they could not be observed, either from Alloa, or even from the Vessells on Board of which they had shipped their Cannon ’till they were just upon them, by reason of the windings and Turnings of that River and as Mr. Grosett had procured proper Pilots for that purpose, they got to the Place appointed, without being observed either from Elphingstone or from Alloa; and as the same Flood Tide and Depth of Water, that would have carry’d the Vessell with the Cannon from Alloa could have carried the Sloops of War there, they could not in this situation have failed, in securing the Vessell and Cannon: But the Commander of the largest Boat, [Pg 356] being seized with an unreasonable Pannick, could not be prevailed with to stay at the place appointed tho’ there was much less Danger in remaining there than in returning: For as in their Return they alarmed the Rebells at Alloa by one of the Boats taking the Ground near that Place, they had a continued Fire to get thro’ as they past Alloa and Elphingstone Batteries; But Mr. Grosett having by order of Lord Justice Clarke taken 200 Matts of Flax from on Board a Dutch ship in the Road of Leith,[612] and placed these along the sides of the Boats there was only one man killed and another wounded on this Expedition, and which answered the end so far as to keep the Vessell from Sailing, and the Rebells from getting their Cannon at this time across the River, as they had projected; Mr. Grosett receiving at this Juncture Information from Alloa that the Rebells there were not even at this time above 200 strong: they upon the Return of the Boats landed the Troops at Kincairdin about three miles below Alloa, with a Design to attack them by Land. But Mr. Grosett being soon after acquainted by different Expresses from Alloa that the Rebells had just received a Reinforcement of 300 men they returned and reimbarked the Troops without any Loss. That Day the Vessell with the Cannon sailed from Alloa; But Mr. Grosett having fallen upon a method to get one of the Sailors who knew the River, and whom they had forced out to assist in the conducting of this[Pg 357] Vessell persuaded to run her on Ground on some of the Banks in her Passage up the River; Upon receiving Information that the Vessell was accordingly grounded, and that the Rebells had thereupon dismounted their Battery at Alloa, and were transporting all the Cannon they had there by Land two miles above Alloa in order to cross them there. It was thereupon resolved to attack their Battery at Elphingstone, and after silencing the Cannon there to proceed with small Vessells and Boats, and set Fire to the Vessell that lay a Ground, with the Cannon and other Military Stores: The Battery at Elphingstone was accordingly attacked with great Resolution and Bravery by the Captains of the Vulture and Pearl Sloops of War, assisted by the Pretty Janet armed Vessell and Jean armed sloop: And after about three hours close cannonading within less than Musquet Shot of the Battery, all their Cannon but one were silenced: But the Pearl having her cable cut asunder by a Cannon ball, she was forced from her Station by the strength of the Ebb-Tide, and the Two Pilots of the Vulture (one of them a Shipmaster at Elphinstone who at Mr Grosett’s Request came to his assistance in this Expedition) having each of them at this Time Lost a leg by another Cannon ball, and by which Accident they both Dyed; They were obliged to quit the Battery; This attack however so far answered the End as to prevent the Rebells from crossing with their Cannon; For upon making this [Pg 358] Attack they brought back their Cannon to Alloa, and placed them upon the Battery, there to prevent the Kings Ships and Troops from procedeing farther up the River, and getting Possession of the Vessell that lay aground above that Place with the Cannon and Ammunition. In this whole affair Two men were killed, Two lost a leg each by which they died and one an Arm by the Cannon from the Batteries, Ten others were wounded, but not disabled; the Chief Engineer and several others of the Rebells were killed and many wounded. Mr. Grosett having on the 11th January received a letter from Lord Justice Clarke with an Order inclosed from General Hawley to Colonel Layton to return with the Troops to join the Army who were then ready to march to the Relief of Sterling Castle, they thereupon returned accordingly; But Mr. Grosett having before he left that country concerted Measures for getting the Vessell burnt that was grounded as above in which the Cannon had been transported from Alloa it was done accordingly without the Rebells knowing how it came about.

Lord Justice Clarke received intel that the rebels were setting up significant supplies at Alloa and planned to move their cannon there to easily transport them across the River Forth for a siege on Sterling Castle. He informed Generals Hawley and Husk, and a strategy was developed to either seize their cannon or at least delay their transport across the river until the General was ready to march with the army to relieve Sterling. To this end, two war sloops were sent up the river, and Mr. Grosett prepared transports to board troops at Leith, where a regiment stood ready to embark at a moment's notice. With everything prepared, Lord Justice Clarke spared no expense in gathering intelligence, receiving frequent updates from Alloa and surrounding areas about the rebels' activities. Early on January 8th, he confirmed that Lord John Drummond and Lord George Murray, alongside the entire cannon the rebels intended to use against Sterling Castle, were set to be at Alloa that night, protected by only about 200 rebels, as they felt safe with the River Sterling bridge destroyed and the rebel army between them and the King's troops. His Lordship and General Husk then went to Leith and quickly deployed 300 troops for this mission, led by Colonel Leighton and assisted by Mr. Grosett. The rebels at Alloa were unaware of their plans, as the river crossing had been cut off for some time, and with favorable winds during their sailing, they thought they could surprise the rebels that night at Alloa. However, halfway there, the wind shifted against them, delaying their arrival until one o'clock the next day at Hegins Nook, three miles below Alloa, where they were halted by the ebbing tide. Upon arrival, Mr. Grosett received word that the rebels were loading their cannon onto a vessel, planning to sail at night and land them about two miles upriver as soon as the tide allowed. Knowing the river and the area well, Mr. Grosett organized fifty soldiers and an equal number of armed sailors to board one large and two smaller boats, tasked with quietly sneaking to the rebels' positions at Elphinstone and Alloa and lying in wait about a mile above Alloa, where the cannon-laden vessel would pass, hidden from view due to the river's twists and turns. Thanks to Mr. Grosett securing suitable pilots, they reached the designated spot unnoticed from Elphinstone or Alloa. The same flood tide that would have assisted the vessel in moving its cannon from Alloa could have similarly aided the war sloops. If circumstances were favorable, they could have succeeded in capturing the vessel and its cargo. But the commander of the largest boat panicked and refused to stay put, despite there being less danger remaining than in retreating. While returning, they alerted the rebels at Alloa, causing one of the boats to run aground nearby, exposing them to gunfire as they passed between Alloa and Elphinstone batteries. Nevertheless, Mr. Grosett, acting on Lord Justice Clarke's orders, had taken 200 mats of flax from a Dutch ship in Leith and lined the boats with them. As a result, only one man was killed, and another was wounded during the expedition, which succeeded in preventing the vessel from sailing and the rebels from moving their cannon as planned. Mr. Grosett received word that the rebels in Alloa were only about 200 strong at that moment. After the boats returned, the troops landed at Kincairdin, roughly three miles below Alloa, with plans to take them on land. Soon after, Mr. Grosett received multiple alerts from Alloa that the rebels had just gained 300 reinforcements, prompting their retreat and the re-embarkation of the troops without any casualties. That day, the vessel with the cannon departed from Alloa; however, Mr. Grosett came up with a plan to get one of the sailors, who knew the river and had been coerced into helping navigate the vessel, to run it aground on some banks during its journey upstream. Upon learning that the vessel was indeed grounded and that the rebels had dismantled their battery at Alloa and were hauling all the artillery they had there overland two miles up the river to cross it, a decision was made to attack their battery at Elphinstone. After successfully neutralizing the cannon there, they aimed to proceed with small vessels and boats to set fire to the grounded ship with the artillery and supplies. The battery at Elphinstone was valiantly attacked by the captains of the *Vulture* and *Pearl* sloops of war, supported by the armed vessel *Pretty Janet* and the armed sloop *Jean*. After about three hours of intense cannon fire, silencing all but one of their cannons, the *Pearl* lost its anchorage due to a cannonball severing its cable, swept away by the ebb tide. The two pilots on the *Vulture*, one of whom was an Elphinstone shipmaster who had come to assist at Mr. Grosett's request, each lost a leg to another cannonball and died from their injuries. They were forced to abandon the battery. However, the assault did succeed in preventing the rebels from moving their cannon, as they retreated with their artillery back to Alloa and placed it back on the battery to block the King's ships and forces from advancing upstream and seizing the grounded vessel with cannon and ammunition. In total, during the operation, two men were killed, two others lost legs and died from their injuries, and one lost an arm to cannon fire from the batteries, while ten others were wounded but not sidelined. The Chief Engineer and several other rebels were also among the dead and wounded. On January 11th, Mr. Grosett received a letter from Lord Justice Clarke, which included an order from General Hawley for Colonel Layton to return with the troops to rejoin the army, which was then ready to march to assist Sterling Castle. They complied and returned as instructed. Before he left the area, Mr. Grosett had arranged for the destruction of the vessel that had run aground carrying the cannon from Alloa, and it was successfully carried out without the rebels being aware of how it happened.

Lord Justice Clarke in his letter, dated the 10th Janry. 1745/6,[613] having sent Mr. Grosett a Letter from General Hawley to General Blackeney[614] who at that time commanded [Pg 359] in the Castle of Sterling with Directions to use all methods possible to get it delivered and answered, as on it depended Matters of the greatest Consequence; Mr. Grosett not only got the Letter safely delivered, but an answer thereto, tho’ the Rebells were at that time in Possession of Sterling and suffered none they could observe to go near the Castle and upon which they kept the strictest Guard.

Lord Justice Clarke, in his letter dated January 10, 1745/6, sent Mr. Grosett a letter from General Hawley to General Blackeney, who was at that time in charge of the Castle of Sterling. The letter contained instructions to use every possible means to ensure it was delivered and answered, as it was crucial for matters of great importance. Mr. Grosett not only managed to get the letter delivered safely but also received a response, even though the rebels were then occupying Sterling and strictly monitoring anyone who approached the castle.

No. 18
Expended in all these Services, for Provisions, Intelligence, Boats, Pilots, etc.
39 4 0

Upon the 12th January 1745/6 Mr. Grosett returned to Edinburgh from this Expedition, and upon the 13th was sent early next morning by Lord Justice Clarke to procure Intelligence of the motions of the Rebells for General Husk, who was that Day to march with the First Division of the Army from Edinburgh for Linlithgow;[615] Upon Mr. Grosett’s coming near that place, being informed by some Country People he had sent into the Town, for Intelligence that [Pg 360] about Twelve hundred of the Rebells had that Morning taken Possession thereof and given out that they were resolved to dispute their Quarters with the Kings Troops. Mr. Grosett returned and acquainted the General thereof who thereupon made the proper Dispositions. The Town of Linlithgow lying in a Hollow upon the South side of a large Lake which cuts off all Communication with or access to the Town from the North and Mr. Grosett having acquainted the General of this and of the situation of the country The General in order to surprize and cut off the retreat of the Rebells to Falkirk where the Main body of their Army lay sent a strong advance Party forward with orders to halt, and remain upon a rising Ground upon the Road about a mile from the East Gate of the Town, and within Sight thereof, and marched the Main Body round another way; which Mr. Grosett conducted them by the South side of the Town where they could not be observed by the Rebells, till they came near the West Gate thereof; and the Rebells having no suspicion of the Main Body’s advancing upon them, while the Advance Guard stood still in sight, their communication with the Main Body of their Army, would by these means have been cut off, if one of their Friends upon accidentally seeing the King’s Troops marching under cover of a Rising Ground by the South side of the Town, had not rode into the Place and given the Alarm to the Rebells who thereupon fled with such Precipitation that the[Pg 361] Troops could not come up with them.[616] Lord [George Murray, Lord Elcho, and others of their Chiefs left their Dinner just as it was going to be set upon the Table. The Dragoons pursued, but not being able to come up with them they took Possession of the Bridge of Linlithgow, over the water Avon, about a mile to the West of that Place, left a sufficient Guard there, and then went into the Town, and eat the Dinner the Rebells had provided, and got ready for themselves.] The Person who gave the alarm was apprehended together with one of the Rebells, and sent Prisoners to Edinburgh, and Mr. Grosett after General Husk appointed proper Places for Out Guards returned to Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley with an Account of these proceedings.

On January 12, 1745/46, Mr. Grosett returned to Edinburgh from his expedition, and on January 13, he was sent early the next morning by Lord Justice Clarke to gather information about the movements of the rebels for General Husk, who was set to march with the first division of the army from Edinburgh to Linlithgow that day. Upon Mr. Grosett’s arrival near Linlithgow, he was informed by some locals he had sent into the town that about twelve hundred rebels had taken possession that morning and claimed they were ready to defend their quarters against the king's troops. Mr. Grosett reported this to the General, who then made the necessary arrangements. The town of Linlithgow is located in a hollow on the south side of a large lake, which cuts off all communication and access to the town from the north. Mr. Grosett informed the General about this and the layout of the area. To surprise and cut off the rebels' retreat to Falkirk, where the main body of their army was, the General sent a strong advance party ahead with orders to pause and hold a rising ground along the road about a mile from the east gate of the town, in view of it, while the main body marched around another way. Mr. Grosett led them along the south side of the town, where they wouldn't be seen by the rebels, until they got close to the west gate. The rebels, unaware of the main body advancing towards them while the advance guard remained visible, would have had their communication with the main army cut off, but one of their allies, upon accidentally spotting the king’s troops moving under cover of a rise, rode into the town and warned the rebels, who then fled so quickly that the troops could not catch up with them. Lord George Murray, Lord Elcho, and other leaders left their dinner just as it was about to be served. The dragoons chased after them, but when they couldn’t catch up, they secured the bridge of Linlithgow over the Avon River, about a mile west of the town, left a sufficient guard there, and then entered the town, eating the dinner that the rebels had prepared, and getting ready for themselves. The person who raised the alarm was captured along with one of the rebels and sent as prisoners to Edinburgh. After General Husk assigned proper locations for outposts, Mr. Grosett returned to Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley with a report of these events.

No. 19
Expended in this Service
4 5 0

The Army being in great want of Gunners and other proper persons for the Artillery which was to march the 15th; but could not get forward ’till these were provided Mr. [Pg 362] Grosett by order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley went to Borristownness, and brought from thence nine or Ten Sailors for that purpose who had been Gunners on Board of Men of War.

The Army was in urgent need of Gunners and other qualified individuals for the Artillery that was set to march on the 15th, but couldn't move forward until these were arranged. Mr. [Pg 362] Grosett, by the order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley, went to Borristownness and brought back nine or ten sailors who had served as Gunners on warships.

No. 20
Expended in this Service being obliged to advance money to each of them to subsist their Families in their Absence before they would agree to go upon this service
16 8 0

Lord Justice Clarke having on Thursday the 17th January in the morning received Intelligence of Importance relating to the Motions and Designs of the Rebells; Mr. Grosett was immediately dispatched by his Lordship, to acquaint General Hawley thereof. After the Battle which happened that day, Mr. Grosett was sent back to acquaint Lord Justice Clarke what had happened but more especially to let his Lordship know that the Kings Troops had at last beat the Rebells from and kept the Field of Battle ’till obliged to leave it for want of Provision, and leave Seven of their Cannon on the Field for want of Horses to carry them off. This Account gave the greater Joy to Lord Justice Clarke, and the other good Friends of the Government at Edinburgh, as before that time they had, by the Flight of the Troops to that Place, been much alarmed with the Accounts they gave of the Defeat of the Kings Army:[617] As the Troops in their Flight to Edinburgh occasioned those that had been sent from theme with Provisions for the Army to return towards that place. Mr. Grosett [Pg 363] therefore by Order of Lord Justice Clarke returned immediately on fresh Horses to force them all back to Linlithgow there not being a Morsel of Provision to be had on any Consideration there for the Troops, who had all of them been obliged to retire to that Place for want thereof, and who by that means were well supply’d. But as the General did not think it advisable to remain there with the Troops, he sent Mr. Grosett back to Lord Justice Clarke to get Quarters provided for the whole Army against their Arrival at Edinburgh and which was done accordingly by the time they got there which was about Four in the afternoon.

Lord Justice Clarke received important information on Thursday, January 17th, in the morning about the movements and plans of the rebels. Mr. Grosett was immediately sent by his Lordship to inform General Hawley. After the battle that took place that day, Mr. Grosett returned to update Lord Justice Clarke on what had happened, specifically to let him know that the King's troops had finally driven the rebels off the battlefield and held it until they had to leave due to a lack of supplies, leaving behind seven cannons because they had no horses to carry them away. This news brought great joy to Lord Justice Clarke and other supporters of the government in Edinburgh, as they had previously been alarmed by the accounts of the King's army's defeat relayed by the fleeing troops. The retreat of these troops caused those sent from them with supplies to also head back towards that location. Mr. Grosett, therefore, on Lord Justice Clarke's orders, immediately returned on fresh horses to force them all back to Linlithgow since there wasn’t a single morsel of food to be found for the troops, who had all been forced to retreat there for lack of supplies and were well-provided for as a result. However, as the General deemed it unwise to stay there with the troops, he sent Mr. Grosett back to Lord Justice Clarke to arrange accommodations for the entire army upon their arrival in Edinburgh, which was successfully arranged by the time they reached there at around four in the afternoon.

No. 21
Expended in this Service and for Assistance to get forward the Provisions to Linlithgow
5 14 0
Jan. 1745/6

Lord Justice Clarke having formed a Scheme to release the Officers of the Kings Troops, who had been made Prisoners at the Battle of Preston, and bring them by force from the respective places to which they were upon their Parole confined in that Part of the Country of which the Rebells had at that time Possession. In order thereto (after those at Glames were brought to Edinburgh) a Company of the Argyleshire Highlanders were (by Order of Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley [to Colonel Campbell][618] of the 20th January) put under [Pg 364] Mr. Grosett’s Directions who crossed the Forth with them in the Night at Queens Ferry, and with their assistance secured and brought safely to Edinburgh from different Parts of the Shires of Fyfe and Perth, Colonel Halket, Captains Stewart, Cochrane, and Dundas who at that time were prisoners with the Rebells in these Countries.[619]

Lord Justice Clarke came up with a plan to free the officers of the King's troops who had been captured at the Battle of Preston and forcibly bring them from the locations where they were held on parole in that part of the country controlled by the rebels at that time. To do this, after those at Glames were brought to Edinburgh, a company of Argyleshire Highlanders was ordered by Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley [to Colonel Campbell][618] on January 20th, to be put under Mr. Grosett’s direction. He crossed the Forth with them at night at Queens Ferry and, with their help, safely secured and brought to Edinburgh Colonel Halket, Captains Stewart, Cochrane, and Dundas, who were then prisoners with the rebels in those areas.[619]

No. 22
Expended in this Service for Boats, Freight Horse hire
6 11 0
Jan. 1745/6

Lord Justice Clarke having on the 25th January about Eight at Night received Information that the Rebells had formed a Design of surprizing the Kings Troops that night at Edinburgh, and in particular the Argyleshire Highlanders, who were the Advance Guard to the Kings Army, Mr. Grosett accompanied by Lieutenant Campbell of the Edinburgh Regiment, went by His Lordships Orders, and acquainted Colonel Campbell, and the other officers thereof who commanded the advance parties some miles from [Pg 365] the Town, to put them upon their Guard, and at the same time employed proper Persons to patrole the Country the whole of that Night, to give timely Notice of the Motions and Approach of the Rebells, and who finding out had got Information of their Design came no farther than Linlithgow.

Lord Justice Clarke, on January 25th at around 8 PM, received information that the rebels were planning to surprise the King’s troops that night in Edinburgh, specifically targeting the Argyleshire Highlanders, who were the advance guard for the King’s army. Mr. Grosett, along with Lieutenant Campbell of the Edinburgh Regiment, followed His Lordship’s orders and informed Colonel Campbell and the other officers in charge of the advance parties a few miles from the town to be on alert. They also sent out the right people to patrol the area throughout the night to provide timely updates on the movements and approach of the rebels, who, upon discovering that their plans were known, stopped at Linlithgow.

No. 23
Expended in this Service
1 10 0

Upon the 29th January 1745/6 Mr. Grosett was sent by Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley to meet the Duke and acquaint His Royal Highness that the Troops were ready to march and that the Guards, Coaches, and Relays of Horses were at the proper stages for forwarding His Royal Highness in the most expeditious manner to Edinburgh.

On January 29, 1745/6, Mr. Grosett was sent by Lord Justice Clarke and General Hawley to meet the Duke and inform His Royal Highness that the troops were ready to march and that the guards, coaches, and relay horses were at the right stages to quickly take His Royal Highness to Edinburgh.

No. 24
... and in getting Coach
1 4 0
Jan. 1745/6

The Duke upon his arrival into Scotland[620] found it necessary for the Service to send two armed Vessells and 100 of the Troops along the Coast of Fife with Sundry Warrants which were only to be shewn and put in execution as things Cast up; These Troops were accordingly embarked by Mr. Grosett, and as His Royal Highness was upon the Recommendation of Lord Justice Clarke pleased to direct that he should have the conducting of this Expedition, and executing of these warrants as occasion should require: The following Order to Captain Coren[621] the Commanding Officer of that Party was with[Pg 366] the Warrants therein referred to delivered to Mr. Grosett, viz:—

The Duke, upon arriving in Scotland[620], found it necessary for the Service to send two armed vessels and 100 troops along the coast of Fife with various warrants that were only to be shown and executed as needed. These troops were accordingly embarked by Mr. Grosett, and since His Royal Highness was pleased to direct that he should lead this expedition and execute these warrants as the situation required, the following order to Captain Coren[621], the commanding officer of that unit, was delivered to Mr. Grosett along with the warrants mentioned:—

‘You are to be assisting to Walter Grosett Esq. one of His Majesty’s Justices of the Peace in executing divers Warrants which he will shew you when proper.’[622]

‘You will be assisting Walter Grosett Esq., one of His Majesty’s Justices of the Peace, in carrying out various warrants that he will show you when the time is right.’[622]

In consequence thereof Mr. Grosett upon the 30th January sailed in the evening from Leith, with the said Vessell and Party, and proceeded to different places on the North Coast betwixt St. Andrews and Alloa, secured all the Magazines of Provisions, which the Rebells had on that Coast, returned the Provisions (being Oatmeal) to the Persons from whom it had been taken by the Rebells, as they were all of them well affected to the Government, and secured nine of the Rebells and sent them by Order of the Duke prisoners to Sterling, His Royal Highness being at this time there with the Army.

As a result, Mr. Grosett set sail on the evening of January 30th from Leith with the vessel and party mentioned, and traveled to various locations along the North Coast between St. Andrews and Alloa. He secured all the stores of provisions that the rebels had on that coast and returned the provisions (which were oatmeal) to the people from whom the rebels had taken them, as they were all loyal to the government. He captured nine of the rebels and, by order of the Duke, sent them as prisoners to Stirling, where His Royal Highness was at that time with the army.

No. 25
Expended in this Service for Boats Freight, and other Charges in embarking the Troops, Landing and reimbarking them from time to time as occasion required, subsistence to them and for Information, Guides, etc.
28 4 0
Feb. 1745/6
No. 26
Expended in providing Boats at Leith and Horses at Kinghorn for carrying with the utmost Expedition a Quantity of Ammunition for the Army at Perth by Order of Lord Justice Clarke of the 8th February
1 15 0

Upon the arrival of the Hessian Troops in the River Forth the 8th February: The[Pg 367] Prince of Hesse having sent Colonel Steuart[623] to Lord Justice Clarke to know where they were to disembark; Mr. Grosett was thereupon directed by His Lordship to proceed with the utmost expedition to the Duke then at Perth to acquaint His Royal Highness thereof,[624] and to know his Pleasure, [whether they should disembark at Leith, or be ordered to the North]; And Mr. Grosett having by three in the morning received his Royal Highness’s Directions to prepare for disembarking them at Leith he immediately returned to Lord Justice Clarke with these Directions.

Upon the arrival of the Hessian Troops in the River Forth on February 8th: The[Pg 367] Prince of Hesse sent Colonel Steuart to Lord Justice Clarke to find out where they were supposed to disembark. Mr. Grosett was then instructed by His Lordship to quickly go to the Duke, who was in Perth, to inform His Royal Highness and to determine his preference on whether they should disembark at Leith or be sent north. Mr. Grosett received His Royal Highness’s directions by three in the morning to prepare for disembarking them at Leith and immediately returned to Lord Justice Clarke with this information.

No. 27
Expended in this Service for Boats Freight to and from Kinghorn, and for Horses from that to and from Perth, and Coach Hire betwixt Leith and Edinburgh
2 15 0

[As Aberdeen, Montrose, Inverness, and the other Places in the North, through which the Army was to march are supply’d with Coals for fireing from the Ports in the River Forth, and as no Coals were allowed to go there while the Rebells were in Possession of these Places they were in that Country in so great want of fireing that the Army under the Duke could not march from Perth till this Want was supply’d, and] As those who were employed to provide the Army with Coals had in vain endeavoured it, and the Duke having directed Lord Justice Clark to be acquainted with the difficulties [Pg 368] they were in Mr. Grosett together with Mr. Henry[625] were thereupon sent by his Lordship’s Directions of the 11th February[626] to all the Ports and Creeks upon the River Forth, and got immediately a considerable Number of Ships and Vessells loden with Coals, and sent them to the different Ports and Places in the North where the Army was to be, and who by these means were instantly well supply’d, and enabled to March, when and where his Royal Highness thought proper.

[As Aberdeen, Montrose, Inverness, and the other places in the North, through which the Army was to march, are supplied with coal for heating from the ports in the River Forth, and since no coal was allowed to go there while the rebels controlled these areas, they were in such great need of fuel that the Army under the Duke couldn't march from Perth until this need was met, and] those who were tasked with providing the Army with coal had tried in vain, and the Duke instructed Lord Justice Clark to be informed about the challenges they faced. [Pg 368] Consequently, Mr. Grosett and Mr. Henry[625] were sent by his Lordship’s directions on February 11[626] to all the ports and creeks along the River Forth. They quickly secured a significant number of ships and vessels loaded with coal and sent them to the various ports and locations in the North where the Army was meant to be, which enabled them to be well supplied right away and allowed them to march when and where his Royal Highness deemed appropriate.

No. 28
Expended in this Service
6 9 0
Feb., 1745/6

The Duke having ordered Blyth’s Regiment[627] with about Four hundred Men of different Corps to be sent by sea from Leith to join the Army in the North; Mr. Grosett by Direction of Lord Justice Clarke of the 23rd February got proper Transports prepared for that purpose, shipt the necessary Provisions, and embarked the men, and which was oblig’d to be done in the night by sending them three Miles in Boats from the Harbour to the Road of Leith to prevent the Transports being neaped in the Harbour.

The Duke ordered Blyth’s Regiment[627] with about four hundred men from different units to be sent by sea from Leith to join the army in the North. On February 23rd, Mr. Grosett, following instructions from Lord Justice Clarke, arranged for appropriate transports to be prepared for that purpose, loaded the necessary supplies, and got the men on board. This had to be done at night, sending them three miles in boats from the harbor to the road at Leith to avoid the transports getting stuck in the harbor.

No. 29
Expended in this Service and sending the Horses of the Regiment from Leith to Kinghorn by water, they being ordered to go from thence by Land to the Army
8 8 0
March, 1745/6

The Transports being put back after they had sailed, and got near their Port and being detained by contrary Winds in the Road of [Pg 369] Leith Mr. Grosett got them supply’d by order of Lord Justice Clarke with additional Stores of Provisions and Boats for bringing on shore such of the recovered Men of the different Corps as had fallen Ill by their confinement.

The transports were returned after they had sailed and were close to their port but were held up by unfavorable winds in the Leith road. Mr. Grosett arranged for them to receive extra supplies of provisions and boats for bringing ashore those men from the various corps who had fallen ill due to their confinement, as ordered by Lord Justice Clarke.

No. 30
Expended in this Service
6 4 0
March, 1745/6

The Duke having ordered a considerable Quantity of Biscuits to be sent him to the North in order to their being carry’d along with the Army as they marched into the Highlands Mr. Grosett by Direction of Lord Justice Clarke of the 6th March got a sufficient Quantity for that purpose from the Castle put up in proper Casks and Baggs, and immediately sent off in to Vessells from Leith, which he had provided for that Service.

The Duke ordered a large amount of biscuits to be sent to him in the North so they could be taken along with the Army as they marched into the Highlands. Following the instructions of Lord Justice Clarke from March 6th, Mr. Grosett collected enough biscuits from the Castle, packed them in appropriate barrels and bags, and immediately shipped them off in vessels from Leith, which he had arranged for that purpose.

No. 31
Expended in this Service
4 13 0

The Duke having sent Directions to Lord Justice Clarke to provide 10 Boats of 20 and 30 Tons Burthen to attend the Army with Provisions and other necessaries as they marched along the Coasts, and as they were immediately wanted: Mr. Grosett by his Lordships Order of the 11th March[628] went to the proper Places where these Boats and small Vessells were to be had and sent them directly away to his Royal Highness, under the care of Mr. M‘Gill Commander of one of the Kings Boats at Leith to whom Mr. Grosett by order of Lord Justice Clarke gave Ten Pounds towards paying his Expenses.

The Duke sent instructions to Lord Justice Clarke to arrange for 10 boats of 20 and 30 tons each to supply the army with provisions and other essentials as they moved along the coast, which were urgently needed. Mr. Grosett, following his Lordship's order from March 11, went to the appropriate places to find these boats and small vessels and sent them straight to His Royal Highness, under the supervision of Mr. M‘Gill, the commander of one of the King's boats at Leith. Mr. Grosett, acting on Lord Justice Clarke's orders, gave Mr. M‘Gill £10 to help cover his expenses.

No. 32
Expended in this Service
12 18 0
[Pg 370]
March, 1745/6

The Transports with the Troops for the North being put back a second time and a great number of the recovered men falling sick again by their confinement the Duke ordered them to be taken o’shore and sent across the Forth from Leith to Kinghorn in Boats and to march from that by Land, which Mr. Grosett did accordingly on the 14th March.

The transport of troops to the North was delayed for a second time, and many of the recovered soldiers fell ill again due to their confinement. The Duke ordered that they be taken offshore and sent across the Forth from Leith to Kinghorn by boat, then to march from there on land. Mr. Grosett carried this out on March 14th.

No. 33
Expended in this Service
4 3 0

Lord Justice Clarke having received an Express from his Grace the Duke of Newcastle with a letter from General Price at Berwick dated 16th March[629] acquainting His Grace that he had received Information from a sure hand that Corn from Northumberland and the adjacent Counties were carried to Wooler a Town 14 Miles from Berwick, and from thence Westward between Stirling and Dumbarton Castle, and privately embarked on the River Clyde, and sent thro’ the Western Islands to Lochaber for the use of the Rebells; Mr. Grosett was thereupon desired by Lord Justice Clarke to go to Sterling and from thence across the Country to Dumbarton Castle, and along the coast to all the Ports and Creeks on the River Clyde as well to enquire particularly into the Truth of this Information as to leave proper Orders and Directions at the Places above mentioned to prevent Provisions of any sort being carried from thence to the Rebells and which Mr. Grosett did accordingly, but did not find that any provisions had gone that way. [Pg 371]

Lord Justice Clarke received a message from His Grace the Duke of Newcastle along with a letter from General Price in Berwick dated March 16th, informing His Grace that he had reliable information that corn from Northumberland and the nearby counties was being taken to Wooler, a town 14 miles from Berwick. From there, it was being transported westward between Stirling and Dumbarton Castle, secretly loaded onto the River Clyde, and sent through the Western Islands to Lochaber for the use of the rebels. Lord Justice Clarke then instructed Mr. Grosett to travel to Stirling and from there across the country to Dumbarton Castle, and along the coast to all the ports and creeks on the River Clyde to investigate this information and ensure proper orders and directions were left at the specified locations to prevent any provisions from being sent to the rebels. Mr. Grosett followed these directions but found that no provisions had been transported that way. [Pg 371]

No. 34
Expended in this Service having rode about Two hundred miles therein.
11 18 0
April, 1746

Lord Justice Clarke having upon the 4th of April received an Express from Brigadier Genl. Price Governor of Berwick giving an Account that three large and one smaller Men of War had appeared off Holy Island and as they made no Return to the proper Signals that were made them from that place, and King’s Sloops and Boats that were cruizing there they believed them to be French Men of War come to the Assistance of the Rebells and as this Account was confirmed by an Express from Mr. Castlelaw, Collector at Dunbar, and Mr. Fall one of the Magistrates there; and that these ships were come within the Mouth of the Forth Mr. Grosett at the Desire of the Lord Justice Clarke went thereupon in the Night and acquainted the Commanders of the Men of War then lying in the Road of Leith thereof. But as they were of no Force to make head against them, these with the other Ships in the Road prepared to slip their Cables, and proceed farther up the Firth, upon the approach of the Men of War above mentioned; After this Mr. Grosett with the assistance of the Custom House and several fishing Boats, which he forced out from Newhaven in the night went in quest of these Men of War, to know certainly what they were, and next day found them to be Dutch Men of War to whom the proper Signals had not been given upon their leaving Holland.

Lord Justice Clarke, on April 4th, received a message from Brigadier General Price, the Governor of Berwick, reporting that three large warships and one smaller ship had appeared off Holy Island. Since these ships did not respond to the appropriate signals sent from that location or from the King's sloops and boats that were patrolling there, they believed these to be French warships come to support the rebels. This information was confirmed by a message from Mr. Castlelaw, the Collector at Dunbar, and Mr. Fall, one of the local magistrates, stating that these ships had entered the Firth of Forth. Mr. Grosett, at the request of Lord Justice Clarke, went there at night to inform the commanders of the warships anchored in the Leith road about this situation. However, seeing that they did not have enough force to engage, these ships, along with others in the road, prepared to slip their cables and move farther up the Firth as the mentioned warships approached. Later, Mr. Grosett, with the help of the Customs House and several fishing boats he recruited from Newhaven during the night, went in search of these warships to confirm their identity. The next day, he discovered they were Dutch warships that had not received the proper signals upon departing from Holland.

No. 35
Expended in this Service
5 15 0
[Pg 372]
April, 1746

The Duke having sent Orders to the Earl of Home[630] who at this time commanded the Troops that lay at Edinburgh to forward with the utmost Expedition to the North the Four Thousand recovered Men of different Corps that were come there from England, Mr. Grosett at his Lordship’s and Lord Justice Clarkes desire went and provided proper Transports, and saw the men embarked and sent off to his Royal Highness, agreeable to Lord Home’s Order of the 15th April 1746.[631]

The Duke sent orders to the Earl of Home, who was in charge of the troops in Edinburgh, to quickly send the four thousand recovered men from different units that had come from England up to the North. Mr. Grosett, at the request of his Lordship and Lord Justice Clarke, took care of arranging suitable transports, ensuring the men were boarded and sent off to his Royal Highness, as per Lord Home's order from April 15, 1746.

No. 36
Expended in this Service, and for Boats to embark the men in the Road of Leith.
6 10 0
April, 1746

The Transports with these men being detained in the Road of Leith by Contrary Winds, and Doctor Maxwell who had the care of the Hospital, having apply’d to Lord Justice Clarke for an additional Transport, to put the weakest and most sickly of the men by themselves Mr. Grosett, was desired to provide one, and which he did accordingly.

The transports with these men were stuck in the Road of Leith due to strong winds, and Doctor Maxwell, who was in charge of the hospital, approached Lord Justice Clarke for an extra transport to separate the weakest and sickest men. Mr. Grosett was then asked to arrange one, and he did as requested.

No. 37
Expended in this Service and for Boats employed in removing the men and provisions from one ship to another.
4 12 0

Commodore Smith[632] upon his Arrival in the [Pg 373] Firth of Forth with the Ships of War under his command being ordered to proceed to the Orkneys, with these and the other Ships, and Sloops of War then in the Road of Leith to prevent their getting assistance from France or making their Escape from these Coasts and Islands; and having thereupon apply’d to Lord Justice Clarke to provide him with proper Pilots for each of the Ships that were to go on that Service: Mr. Grosett by his Lordship’s Directions went and got them immediately provided from different Ports.

Commodore Smith[632] arrived in the [Pg 373] Firth of Forth with the warships under his command, having been ordered to proceed to the Orkneys. He aimed to prevent these and the other ships and sloops of war currently in the Road of Leith from receiving help from France or escaping from these coasts and islands. He then contacted Lord Justice Clarke to arrange for proper pilots for each of the ships going on that mission. Following his Lordship's instructions, Mr. Grosett immediately secured pilots from various ports.

No. 38
Expended in this service
4 8 0
[Pg 374]
April, 1746

The Great Coats, Blankets, Shoes, Shirts, Waistcoats, Gloves, etc., given by different Companies and Corporations in Presents to the Army being sent to the Care of Lord Justice Clarke,[633] Mr. Grosett by his Lordships Directions received and saw them duely forwarded from time to time to the Army.

The Great Coats, Blankets, Shoes, Shirts, Waistcoats, Gloves, etc., given by different Companies and Corporations as gifts to the Army, are being sent to the care of Lord Justice Clarke. Mr. Grosett, following his Lordship's instructions, received them and ensured they were properly forwarded to the Army on a regular basis.

No. 39
Expended in this Service
10 5 0

His Royal Highness the Duke having directed Lord Justice Clarke to be apply’d to for his assistance in procuring what should from time to time be found necessary for the Army in general; and in particular for the more speedy embarkation of the Hessian Troops, and the Four British Regiments ordered for Flanders, and in getting the Clothing of Major General Wolf’s Regiment[634] forwarded in the most expeditious manner from Leith to Perth that Regimt. being upon Receipt thereof ordered to march to Burnt Island to embark there with the other British Regiments. Mr. Grosett by his Lordship’s Directions accordingly assisted Colonel Steuart and others in procuring what was from time to time found necessary for these purposes.

His Royal Highness the Duke directed Lord Justice Clarke to assist in obtaining what was needed for the Army as required; especially for the quicker deployment of the Hessian Troops and the Four British Regiments assigned to Flanders, as well as ensuring that the clothing for Major General Wolf’s Regiment was sent as quickly as possible from Leith to Perth. That regiment was set to march to Burnt Island to board with the other British Regiments upon receiving it. Mr. Grosett, following his Lordship’s instructions, helped Colonel Steuart and others in acquiring what was necessary for these efforts.

No. 40
Expended in this Service
7 8 0

That besides the services above mentioned Mr. Grosett was during the Course of the Rebellion constantly employed by Lord Justice Clarke in the extraordinary [Pg 375] affairs of the Government at this ... to answer all Imergence ... ty for his keeping Horses at different ... and as some of them fell into the hands of the Rebells, and others were lost by hard Riding and other accidents.

That in addition to the services mentioned above, Mr. Grosett was constantly employed by Lord Justice Clarke during the Rebellion in the extraordinary affairs of the Government at this time to handle all emergencies regarding his keeping of horses at different locations. Some of these horses fell into the hands of the Rebels, while others were lost due to hard riding and other accidents.

No. 41
Expended on this Account and sundry other Services during the Course of the Rebellion not mentioned in the Above Articles.
110 0 0
Total Money Expended. 662 11 0
Received of the above Sum from Genl. Guest to Acct. 105 0 0
Ballance 557 11 0

Wal: Grosett.

Wal: Grosett.

N.B.—Mr. Grosett being from the first Breaking out of the Rebellion employed in so open and remarkable a manner in the service of the Government created against him the particular Ill will of the Jacobites and their Adherents and who on that account took every Opportunity of shewing their Resentment against him, they plundered his House in the Town of Alloa, and in the Country carried off effects to a very great value, drove all the Cattle from off his Estate, forced the Payment of the Rents thereof to them, stript his wife and children of the very cloathes they had on, and used otherways in a most inhuman manner.

N.B.—Mr. Grosett, right from the start of the Rebellion, was actively involved in serving the Government, which earned him the deep animosity of the Jacobites and their supporters. Because of this, they seized every chance to express their anger towards him. They looted his house in Alloa, took valuable items from his estate, drove away all the livestock, forced him to pay rent to them, stripped his wife and children of their clothes, and treated them in an extremely cruel manner.

Brunstane, 4th Septem. 1747.

Brunstane, Sept 4, 1747.

‘I do certify that Mr. Grosett was employ’d by me in the service of the Government in the several matters above mentioned, and also on other occasions and was[Pg 376] zealous and active in the Execution of whatever was committed to his care.

‘I certify that Mr. Grosett was employed by me in the service of the Government for the various matters mentioned above, as well as on other occasions, and was[Pg 376] enthusiastic and proactive in carrying out whatever tasks were assigned to him.

‘(Signed)
And. Fletcher,
Lord Justice Clarke.’

‘(Signed)
And. Fletcher,
Lord Justice Clarke.’

N.B.—These Services ... forth and Certify’d in a Pap ... Cope, the Generals Guest, ... syde and Hawley and by Lord Home.

N.B.—These Services ... presented and certified in a paper ... Cope, the general's guest, ... Side and Hawley and by Lord Home.

Nothing charged for trouble and loss of time, etc.

Nothing charged for inconvenience and wasted time, etc.

[This postscript is too torn to decipher accurately but it refers to the ‘Narrative’ which bears this docquet]:—

[This postscript is too torn to read clearly, but it mentions the ‘Narrative’ that has this note]:—

We have perused the above Narrative, and do hereby certify that the same is true so far as regards us respectively,

We have read the above Narrative and hereby certify that it is true to the best of our knowledge.

R. Handasyde.
Home. H. Hawley.
Joseph. Guest.
John Cope.

[Pg 379]

[Pg 379]

LETTERS AND ORDERS FROM THE CORRESPONDENCE OF WALTER GROSSETT

I

I

The Lord Advocate to Walter Grossett and others

The Lord Advocate to Walter Grossett and others

By the Honl Robt. Craigie Esqr His Majesties Advocate General

By the Honl Robt. Craigie Esqr His Majesty's Advocate General

These are ordering and requiring you and each of you to concur in sending all Vessells of whatever kind upon the North and Southsides of the Firth from Stirling to Kinghorn to the Harbours of Leith and Borristounness and in case of resistance you are to use force in making the Order effectual Given under my Hand at Edinburgh this ninth day of Sepr 1745 yeare.

These instructions require each of you to agree to send all types of vessels from the north and south sides of the Firth, from Stirling to Kinghorn, to the ports of Leith and Borrowstounness. If there is any resistance, you are to use force to enforce this order. Given under my hand in Edinburgh on this ninth day of September 1745.

Rob: Craigie.

Rob: Craigie.

To all Sherriffs Justices of Peace Magistrats of Burghs and all others his Majesties Leedgeses.

To all Sheriffs, Justices of the Peace, Magistrates of Burghs, and all others in His Majesty's service.

Mr. Grosett the Coll. at Alloa has Special Directions to See this order put in Execution.

Mr. Grosett, the Collector at Alloa, has specific instructions to carry out this order.

Rob: Craigie.

Rob: Craigie.

II

II

Lieutenant-General Handasyde to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Handasyde to Walter Grossett

By the Honble Roger Handasyde Esqr Lieutenant General and Commander in Cheif of All His Majesty’s Forces, in North Britain etc.

By the Honorable Roger Handasyde, Esq., Lieutenant General and Commander in Chief of All His Majesty’s Forces in North Britain, etc.

Whereas it has been found Injurious to His Majesty’s Service that any Boats shou’d pass from Leith to Kinghorn or from Kinghorn to [Pg 380] Leith, These are therefore Requiring All Magistrates, Justices of the Peace, Constables and Others concerned to be Aiding and Assisting to you in bringing all the Passage Boats and Yauls from Kinghorn and all other places on the North Side of the Forth to the Harbour of Leith where they are to be kept till His Majesty’s Service shall allow of their being returned to their Respective Ports.

Whereas it has been found harmful to His Majesty’s Service that any boats should travel from Leith to Kinghorn or from Kinghorn to Leith, all magistrates, justices of the peace, constables, and others involved are hereby required to assist you in bringing all the passage boats and vessels from Kinghorn and all other locations on the north side of the Forth to the harbor of Leith, where they are to be kept until His Majesty’s Service permits their return to their respective ports.

Given under my hand at Edinburgh this 26th Novemr 1745.

Given under my hand at Edinburgh this 26th day of November 1745.

R: Handasyde.

R: Handasyde.

To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

To Walter Grosett Esq., Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

III

III

Lieutenant-General Handasyde to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Handasyde to Walter Grossett

By the Honble Roger Handasyd Esqr. Leutt General and Commander in Chief of all His Majs Forces in North Brittain.

By the Honorable Roger Handasyd, Esq. Lieutenant General and Commander in Chief of all His Majesty's Forces in North Britain.

Whereas it has been found Injurious to His Majesties Service that any Boats should pass from the North or South sides of the Forth or that any Vessells whatever should be allowed to remain upon the North side of the said River These are therefore requiring all Magistrats, Justices of the Peace, Constables and others concerned to be aiding and assisting to you in Stoping the said passage and removeing all Boats and Vessells whatever from the North to the South Side of the Forth from Kinghorn to Stirling Bridge and in case of resistance or refussall to Burn or otherwise Destroy such Boats and Vessells as shall after due Intimation made be found upon the North Side of the said River.

Whereas it has been found harmful to His Majesty’s service that any boats should pass from the north or south sides of the Forth, or that any vessels should be allowed to remain on the north side of this river, you are therefore required to enlist the help of all magistrates, justices of the peace, constables, and others involved to assist you in stopping this passage and removing all boats and vessels from the north to the south side of the Forth, from Kinghorn to Stirling Bridge. In case of resistance or refusal, you are to burn or otherwise destroy any boats and vessels that, after proper notice, are found on the north side of the river.

Given under my Hand at Edinburgh this 27th November 1745.

Given under my hand in Edinburgh this 27th day of November 1745.

R: Handasyde.

R: Handasyde.

To Walter Grosett Esqr, Collr of His Majesties Customs at Alloa, and one of His Majs Justices of ye Peace.

To Walter Grosett Esq, Collector of His Majesty's Customs at Alloa, and one of His Majesty's Justices of the Peace.

[Pg 381]

[Pg 381]

IV

IV

The Commissioners of Customs to Walter Grossett

The Customs Commissioners to Walter Grossett

Mr. Grosett.

Mr. Grosett.

Inclosed We send You for Your Government and Direction, a Copy of a Letter from the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest Commander in Chief of His Majestys Forces in Scotland, Containing an order and Instructions for bringing over all Ships, Vessels, Boats and Yoals of all sorts and sizes lying in the Harbours and Creeks betwixt Stirling Bridge and St Andrews inclusive on the North side of the Frith with their Apparel and Furniture, and for laying them up in the several Harbours therein Specified on the South side of the Frith, and in the Execution of these Directions and Instructions, all Officers whatsoever under Our direction, are to give You their utmost assistance when required so to do, as they will answer the Contrary at their Peril, and You are particularly to apply to the respective Officers in the several Ports and Precincts for their Aid and Information. The General having given proper orders to the Captain of the Milford Man of war to concur and assist You in this Servise, You are to meet and Concert with him proper measures for the Effectual Execution thereof. We are,

We enclose a copy of a letter from the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest, the Commander in Chief of His Majesty's Forces in Scotland. It contains an order and instructions for bringing all ships, vessels, boats, and yawls of various types and sizes from the harbors and creeks between Stirling Bridge and St Andrews, inclusive, on the north side of the Frith, along with their equipment and furnishings. The goal is to store them in the specified harbors on the south side of the Frith. In carrying out these instructions, all officers under our direction are to provide you with their full support when needed, as they will be held responsible for not doing so. You should reach out specifically to the respective officers in the various ports and areas for their assistance and information. The General has issued proper orders to the Captain of the Milford Man of War to assist you in this task, so you should coordinate with him to ensure effective execution. We are,

Your Loving Friends,

Your Caring Friends,

Co: Campbell.
Alex Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.

Co: Campbell.
Alex Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.

Customho Edinbr
8th Decemr 1745.
}

Collr Alloa.

Coll Alloa.

Enclosure to No. IV.

Attachment to No. IV.

Edinbr Decemr 9th 1745.

Edinburgh, December 9, 1745.

Gentlemen—We think it absolutely necessary for the Good and Service of the Government at this Conjuncture, that all the Ships, Vessels, Boats and Yoals of all sorts and Sizes, with their Apparel and Furniture, in all Harbours[Pg 382] and Creeks etc. betwixt Stirling Bridge and St Andrews inclusive on the North side of the Frith of Forth, be brought over and Moord in the several Harbours of Dunbar, Leith, Queensferry and Borrowstoness, and these on the South side of the said River, betwixt Cramond and Eymouth be Carried to Leith and Dunbar, as the Persons to be Employed by You in the Execution hereof, shall Judge to be most Conveneint, all to remain in these respective Harbours untill further orders; We therefore earnestly recommend it to You as proper Judges, to Nominate and Appoint such of Your Officers under Your Direction and Government to Execute our Orders as You shall think most fit to be Employed for the doing of so necessary a Duty, And as some former Orders of this Nature have not been observed and obeyed so punctually as Directed for want of other proper Assistance, We do therefore hereby direct and ordain all Magistrates of Burghs Justices of the Peace, Constables etc. within the respective bounds aforesaid, laying aside all Excuses whatsoever, to be aiding and assisting to the Person or Persons that are possessed of Copys hereof, and of Your Instructions given by You to them, as they will be answerable upon their highest Peril; and in Case any of the Proprietors or others Concerned in said Ships etc. as abovementd shall not forthwith Comply with these Our orders, Then the Persons so Employed are hereby ordained to burn and Destroy the same, where any objections or refusals are made to obey and Comply herewith, and the aforesaid Copys hereof with your Instructions as above, shall be to them a Sufficient Warrant for destroying of the above Ships etc. not doubting of Your Compliance and Concurrence, We are,

Guys—We believe it is crucial for the good and service of the government at this time that all ships, vessels, boats, and various types of smaller craft, along with their equipment and furnishings, in all harbors[Pg 382] and creeks between Stirling Bridge and St. Andrews, including the north side of the Firth of Forth, be moved over and docked in the harbors of Dunbar, Leith, Queensferry, and Borrowstounness. Additionally, those on the south side of the river, between Cramond and Eyemouth, should be taken to Leith and Dunbar as deemed most convenient by the individuals you assign to carry out this task. All boats should remain in their respective harbors until further notice. Therefore, we strongly advise you, as responsible judges, to nominate and appoint any of your officers under your command to execute our orders as you see fit for this important duty. Some previous orders of this nature have not been followed as closely as directed, often due to a lack of proper support. We hereby instruct all magistrates of burghs, justices of the peace, constables, etc., within the mentioned areas, to set aside all excuses and assist the person or persons who hold copies of this message and your instructions. They will be held accountable under the highest peril. If any of the owners or others involved with the aforementioned ships do not comply immediately with these orders, then the appointed individuals are authorized to burn and destroy them wherever there are objections or refusals to follow these commands. The copies of this message along with your instructions will serve as sufficient authority for destroying the listed ships, etc. We trust in your cooperation and support.

Sign’d I'm ready to assist you. Please provide the short phrases you want to modernize. And: Fletcher.
Jos: Visitor.

N.B.—Buys Boat who has been often Employed in transporting of Rebels frequently, should be burnt out of hand.

N.B.—Anyone who frequently hires a boat for transporting rebels should be dealt with immediately.

Honble Commrs of the Customs Edr.

Honorable Customs Commissioners Ed.

[Pg 383]

[Pg 383]

V

V

Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Guest to Walter Grossett

Edenburgh December the 15th 1745.

Edinburgh December 15, 1745.

Sr,—I agree to your hiring the Borrowstness Ship at the Rate you mention, provided the owners dont insist on my Insuring her from the Enemy, for that I cant consent to—if they comply, you’l immediatly station her at Higgins Nook, and Nicol at Carse’s Nook, or wherever they can be best placed for His Majestys Service. You’l give them positive Derections to be very carefull, in watching both sides the River, and sending immediat Intelligence to the Ld Justice Clerk, on discovering any Motions of the Enemy.

Sr.,—I agree to your hiring the Borrowstness Ship at the rate you mentioned, as long as the owners don’t insist on my insuring her against the enemy, because I can’t agree to that. If they accept, you'll immediately station her at Higgins Nook and Nicol at Carse’s Nook, or wherever they can be best positioned for His Majesty's service. You'll give them clear instructions to be very careful in watching both sides of the river and to send immediate updates to the Ld Justice Clerk upon spotting any movements of the enemy.

You’l consider the Ship is not ensured now, and is in as much, or more danger than when employd by his Majesty.—I am Sr your most Obedt humble Servant,

You’ll think the ship isn't insured right now and is in as much, or even more danger than when it was used by His Majesty. —I am Sir, your most obedient humble servant,

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Guest.

VI

VI

Walter Grossett to the Commissioners of Customs

Walter Grossett to the Customs Commissioners

Hond. Sirs,—In Obedience to your directions of the 8th Instant Inclosing an Order and Warrand from Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest Commander in chief of the Forces in Scotland, for bringing over all Ships, Vessells and Boats, lying in any of the Harbours or Creeks, betwixt Stirling and S: Andrews on the North side of the Firth, to the Harbours therein specified on the south side thereof, and for Burning or destroying the ships and Vessells etc., of such of the Proprieters thereof as should refuse to comply with these Orders; I have with the assistance of the Kings Boats at Queensferry and Borristounness, and two Boats Crews belonging to the Happy Janet stationed off Queensferry, removed, disabled, or destroyed, all Boats and Vessells that lay betwixt Stirling and Aberdour. But as the doing of this, would not have hinder the Rebell Army from geting a Cross the River, while Boats and Vessells were allowed to remain at the severall Creeks in[Pg 384] Carron Water, and at Hargens Nuik Airth, and Elphingstone, and other Creeks on the south side of the Forth betwixt Borristounness and Stirling; I therefore proceeded to these places, and prevailed with severall of the Proprieters of Boats and Vessells there, to remove them from thence, but as some of them refused to comply, by reason of their not being included in the Order and Warrand above mentioned, I am therefore Humbly of Opinion, that Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest should be applyed to, for a Warrand for the removing or destroying of them. And as there are at this time at Alloa, a considerable quantity of Deals and Learge Loggs of Wood, of 30 or 40 feet in Length, of which Floots may not only easely be made, for the Transporting of Men, Horses etc.; from the one side of the River to the other, but upon which Flooting Batteries may be reased, to move from place to place, to play upon such of His Majesties Forces or others, who may be employed in Defending the Banks of the River, to prevent the Landing of the Rebells. It is therefore Humbly submitted, how far it may be thought proper at this Juncture, to have these Deals and Loggs removed from Alloa. If this is approven off, what I would propose as the easiest method of removing them, would be to put them on Board of Vessells, to ly at Borristounness till the danger is over. With this view I spook to several shipmasters of my acquaintance, (who I knew to be good Whiggs and well wishers to the common Cause) on Tuesday last at Borristounness, and who at my request, readily agreed to take them on Board their Vessells, upon their only being paid the Charges they should be put to in going to Alloa to Load and unload them. All which is Humbly Submitted by Hon: Sirs Your Hors Most Obedt Huml Servt

Hond. Guys,—In response to your instructions from the 8th of this month, which included an order and warrant from the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest, Commander in Chief of the Forces in Scotland, for bringing all ships, vessels, and boats from any harbors or creeks between Stirling and St. Andrews on the north side of the Firth to the specified harbors on the south side, and for burning or destroying the ships and vessels of any owners who refuse to comply with these orders; I have, with the help of the King's boats at Queensferry and Borristounness, and two boat crews from the Happy Janet stationed off Queensferry, removed, disabled, or destroyed all boats and vessels that were between Stirling and Aberdour. However, this action would not have prevented the rebel army from crossing the river while boats and vessels remained in various creeks in Carron Water, Hargens Nuik, Airth, Elphingstone, and other creeks on the south side of the Forth between Borristounness and Stirling. Therefore, I proceeded to those locations and convinced several of the boat and vessel owners there to remove their vessels, but since some refused to comply, stating they were not included in the above-mentioned order and warrant, I humbly believe that we should contact the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest for a warrant to remove or destroy them. Additionally, there is a significant quantity of lumber and large logs of wood, 30 or 40 feet long, currently at Alloa, which could easily be used to create floats for transporting people and horses across the river, and on which floating batteries could also be constructed to move and fire upon any of His Majesty's Forces or others who may be involved in defending the riverbanks against the rebels. Therefore, I humbly suggest that we consider how appropriate it may be at this time to have these deals and logs removed from Alloa. If this is approved, I propose the easiest method of removing them would be to put them on board vessels to stay at Borristounness until the danger passes. With this in mind, I spoke with several shipmasters I know (who are supportive Whigs and the common cause) last Tuesday at Borristounness, and they readily agreed to take them on board their vessels if they are only paid for the expenses incurred in going to Alloa to load and unload them. All of which is humbly submitted by Hon: Sirs Your Hors Most Obedt Huml Servt

Wat: Grosett.

Wat: Grosett.

Edinburgh 16th Decr 1745.

Edinburgh, December 16, 1745.

Endorsements.

Reviews.

16th Decr 1745.

Dec 16, 1745.

Mr. Grosett to wait upon the Justice Clerk and Genl Guest with this Lre. and to Report their Opinion.

Mr. Grosett to meet with the Justice Clerk and Genl Guest with this letter and to share their opinion.

W. H. for the Secry.

W. H. for the Sec.

[Pg 385]

[Pg 385]

The Board approve Mr. Grosetts Conduct and Zeal in this whole Affair and his proposal is agreed to if the Lord Justice Clerk and Genl Guest think proper.

The Board approves Mr. Grosett's conduct and enthusiasm in this entire matter, and his proposal is accepted if the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest deem it appropriate.

W. H. for the Secretary.

W. H. for the Sec.

VII

VII

The Commissioners of Customs to Walter Grossett, forwarding approval of Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest

The Customs Commissioners to Walter Grossett, sending approval from Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest

Edinburgh 16th Decr 1745.

Edinburgh December 16, 1745.

We approve of Mr. Grosetts Conduct and proposalls and desire the Board of Customs may give him the proper directions for puting the same in Execution and for which end a proper Warrant shall be granted by us.

We approve of Mr. Grosett's conduct and proposals and ask that the Board of Customs provide him with the appropriate guidance for carrying them out, for which purpose, we will issue a proper warrant.

And Fletcher.
Jos: Guest.

And Fletcher.
Jos: Guest.

Mr. Grosett

Mr. Grosett

Having considered the above Approbation of the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest, We heartily agree with the same and direct you to proceed accordingly, having first obtained their Warrant for the purposes as mentioned in Your Letter of this date.

Having reviewed the approval from the Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest, we fully agree and instruct you to proceed accordingly, after first obtaining their warrant for the purposes mentioned in your letter dated today.

Co: Campbell.
Alexr Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.

Co: Campbell.
Alexr Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.

Custom Ho Edinburgh
16th December 1745.

Custom Ho Edinburgh
16th December 1745.

VIII

VIII

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

(Holograph but not signed)

(Hologram but not signed)

Pray forward the Inclosed, and get all Stirling shire in Arms immediately, If Ld Home approves G. Blackney will give arms—raise ye Hue and Cry—Cause the Sherriff distribute ye papers yt comes wt ys bearer.

Pray send this along, and get everyone in Stirling shire armed right away. If Lord Home agrees, G. Blackney will provide weapons—start the Alert—have the Sheriff distribute the papers that come with this messenger.

Go on and prosper.

Live long and thrive.

[Pg 386]

[Pg 386]

Edr 19th Decr 1745.

Edr 19th Dec 1745.

I have paid none of the Expresses yt they may make more hast but given every one two shills. wch is not to be deducted out of yr hire if they make Speed.

I haven't paid any of the Expresses so they can hurry up, but I've given each one two shillings, which won't be taken out of your pay if they make good time.

IX

IX

Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett

Lieutenant General Guest to Walter Grossett

Joshua Guest Esqr Lieut. General and Commander in Cheif of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts and Barracks in North Britain etc.

Joshua Guest Esqr Lieutenant General and Commander in Chief of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts, and Barracks in Northern Britain, etc.

His Majesty’s Service Requiring that all Vessells and Boats of whatever Size be instantly removed out of the Harbours of Borrostouness, Queensferry, Leith or any where else upon the South Coast of the Forth betwixt Leith and Stirling, Those at Borrostouness and Queensferry to the Road of Borrostouness or Such other place or places as you shall think most for His Majesty’s Service at this Juncture; those at Leith to the Road of Leith or such other place as you shall judge most proper for said Service; These are therefore Authorizing and Empowering you to put the said order in Execution, and to which purpose the Commanders of His Majesty’s Ships of War or others employ’d in the Kings Service, are hereby Required to give you their Utmost Assistance, as are all Magistrates, Justices of the Peace, Constables, and all other Persons, Civil or Military whom these may Concern. A Copy hereof sign’d by you shall be a sufficient warrant to any Person required or empower’d by you in the Execution hereof as they will answer to the Contrary at their highest Peril.

His Majesty’s Service requires that all vessels and boats of any size be immediately removed from the harbors of Borrowstounness, Queensferry, Leith, or anywhere else along the south coast of the Forth between Leith and Stirling. Those at Borrowstounness and Queensferry should go to the road of Borrowstounness or any other location you believe is best for His Majesty’s Service at this time; those at Leith should head to the road of Leith or another place you deem most suitable for the same purpose. Therefore, you are authorized and empowered to carry out this order, and the commanders of His Majesty’s ships of war or others engaged in the King’s Service are required to provide you their fullest assistance, as are all magistrates, justices of the peace, constables, and any other persons, civil or military, whom this may concern. A copy of this document signed by you will serve as adequate authorization for anyone you require or empower to execute this order, as they will answer for any failure to do so at their highest risk.

Given at Edinburgh the 21st day of Decemr 1745.

Given at Edinburgh on the 21st day of December 1745.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Guest.

To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

To Walter Grosett Esq., Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

[Pg 387]

[Pg 387]

X

X

Lieutenant-General Guest’s Directions

Lieutenant-General Guest’s Instructions

Directions for the Master of the Boat that goes to Borrostouness.

Directions for the Captain of the Boat heading to Borrostouness.

Edinburgh 22d Decem. 1745.

Edinburgh, December 22, 1745.

He is to sail directly for Borrostouness, lye out in the Road of that place and send in his Boat or yawl, to Collector Grosett who is there and get directions from him how he is to dispose of his Cargo, part of which is to go to Stirling Viz. the 9 pounders Cannon Ball, Spunges, etc.

He is supposed to sail straight to Borrostouness, anchor in the harbor there, and send his boat or yawl to Collector Grosett, who is on-site, to get instructions on how to handle his cargo, part of which needs to go to Stirling, specifically the 9-pound cannonballs, sponges, etc.

The Pouder and small Cannon Ball is for the use of the Jean of Alloa, and Pretty Janet, that are stationed near that place or at Higgens Nuik. The Biscuit which is to be taken in at Leith from Mr. Walker is to be disposed of at Bosness as Mr. Grosett will direct. In case of any accident of your not meeting with Mr. Grosett, I desire Cap. Knight of the Happy Janet may forward im̅ediately the 9 pound Cannon Ball, Spunges etc. to Stirling, where General Blakeney has present occasion for them.

The powder and small cannonball are for the use of the Jean of Alloa and Pretty Janet, which are stationed nearby or at Higgens Nuik. The biscuits that are to be picked up in Leith from Mr. Walker should be taken to Bosness as directed by Mr. Grosett. If you happen to miss meeting Mr. Grosett, I ask that Captain Knight of the Happy Janet immediately send the 9-pound cannonball, sponges, etc., to Stirling, where General Blakeney currently needs them.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Visitor.

To the Master of the Boat Order’d to sail for Borrostouness.

To the Captain of the Boat Ordered to sail for Borrostouness.

XI

XI

Captain Knight R.N. to Walter Grossett

Captain Knight R.N. to Walter Grossett

Sir,—Having Sent 7 pounds of powder, 20 Sheets fine paper made in Cartridges and 15 pounds Musquet Shot to be used, if occasion required it, by my people in preventing the Rebells passage at Higgens-Nook, which I understand you gaue to John Peirson Master of the Pretty Jennett, I desire you will be pleased to procure an Order from General Guest to me for supplying these Ordnance Stores to him, with his Ricept to Alexander Wedderburn Master of the Armed Vessel under my Command of the[Pg 388] Same, and to transmit both to me at this place with the first opportunity.—I am Sir, Your very humble Servant,

Mr.,—I have sent 7 pounds of gunpowder, 20 sheets of fine paper in cartridges, and 15 pounds of musket shot for my people to use, if needed, to block the rebels' passage at Higgens-Nook. I understand you gave these supplies to John Peirson, the captain of the Pretty Jennett. I would appreciate it if you could get an order from General Guest for supplying these ordnance stores to him, along with his receipt to Alexander Wedderburn, the captain of the armed vessel under my command. Please send both of these to me here at your earliest convenience.—I am Sir, Your very humble servant,

Jno. Knight.

Jno. Knight.

Happy Jennett Queensferry Road
22d December 1745.

Happy Jennett Queensferry Road
December 22, 1745.

Walter Grosett Esq. Collector of his Majts Customs at Alloa.

Walter Grosett Esq. Collector of His Majesty's Customs at Alloa.

XII

XII

Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Guest to Walter Grossett

Joshua Guest Esqr Lieut. General and Commander in Cheif of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts and Barracks in North Britain etc.

Joshua Guest Esqr Lieutenant General and Commander in Chief of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts, and Barracks in Northern Britain, etc.

His Majesty’s Service Requiring that a number of Vessells and Boats be hired for Transporting of His Majesty’s Forces, These are therefore authorizing and Empowering you to hire such a number of Vessells and Boats and make such agreement with them as you shall judge necessary at this Juncture, and I hereby oblige myself to make good such agreement, for which this shall be your Warrant. Given at Edinburgh this 22d December 1745.

His Majesty’s Service requires that several vessels and boats be hired to transport His Majesty’s forces. Therefore, you are authorized and empowered to hire the necessary vessels and boats and make any agreements you deem necessary at this time. I hereby commit to uphold such agreements, and this will serve as your warrant. Given in Edinburgh on December 22, 1745.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Visitor.

To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

To Walter Grosett Esq., Collector of His Majesty's Customs.

XIII

XIII

The Earl of Home to Walter Grosset

The Earl of Home to Walter Grosset

Linlithgow Decer 23 1745.

Linlithgow Dec 23 1745.

Sir,—Having receiv’d information That John Liddel in Haugh of Dalderse lying in Newtown Pow hath a Boat, and that there are another Boat upon Carron Watter belonging to James Simpson on the west side of John Liddels in the Pow about the Slyde bank bridge, I desire you’l order them to be immediatly secured or destroyed as you think proper.—I am Sir Your Humble Serv.

Mr.,—I’ve received information that John Liddel in Haugh of Dalderse, located in Newtown Pow, has a boat, and there is another boat belonging to James Simpson on the west side of John Liddel’s property in the Pow, near the Slyde bank bridge. I’d like you to order them to be secured or destroyed immediately, as you see fit.—I am, Sir, Your Humble Servant.

Home.

Home.

[Pg 389]

[Pg 389]

XIV

XIV

Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Guest to Walter Grossett

Edinburgh 23d Decem. 1745.

Edinburgh, December 23, 1745.

Sir,—There being a necessity for the Forces who are this night to be at Linlithgow and Borrostouness, to march in here tomorrow morning by Ten o’clock if possible, which I have sent them orders to do, I therefore desire the favour of you to hire all the Ships that are loose that lye at Borrostouness or Contiguous, and in the first place, I hereby empower you to employ the Vessells that are in His Majesty’s Service and stationed at Higgens Nuik or elsewhere near you (Excepting the Happy Janet who is to continue in her Station) In order to put aboard the said Vessells or Boats the Baggage and Sick or more Men as the Commanding Officer of these Forces shall direct, which Vessells are to proceed to Berwick, You will cause lay in what meal or other provisions can be got for the men that are in these Vessells. If this Service cannot be performed without the assistance of the Happy Janet I have sent an order for that purpose.—I am Sr Your most humb Sert.

Gentleman,—Due to the need for the Forces to be in Linlithgow and Borrostouness tonight, they are to march here tomorrow morning by 10 o’clock if possible, and I have already sent them orders to do so. I kindly ask you to hire all the available ships at Borrostouness or nearby. In the first place, you are authorized to use the vessels that are in His Majesty’s Service and stationed at Higgens Nuik or other close locations (excluding the Happy Janet, who should remain in her station). This is to load the baggage, the sick, or more troops as directed by the Commanding Officer of these Forces. These vessels will then head to Berwick. Please arrange to stock up on whatever meal or other provisions can be acquired for the men on these vessels. If this task cannot be completed without the assistance of the Happy Janet, I have sent an order for that as well.—I am Sr Your most humb Sert.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Visitor.

P.S.—The Boat with Biscuit etc. cou’d not Sail last night, nor this day the wind being contrary, but it shall be sent or meet the Vessells as they come opposite to Leith.

P.S.—The boat with the biscuits and other supplies couldn't set sail last night, and the same goes for today since the wind is against us. However, it will be sent or will meet the vessels as they come near Leith.

XV

XV

Lieutenant-General Guest to Captain Knight R.N.

Lieutenant-General Guest to Captain Knight R.N.

Edinburgh 23d Decemr 1745.

Edinburgh, December 23, 1745.

Walter Grosett Esqr has directions from me to be assisting to the Forces that are this night to Quarter at Linlithgow and Borrostouness in which I also desire you will do your Utmost, either in Transporting them eastwards or Otherways as he will give you directions from the Commanding officer, and you will [Pg 390]return to your Station as soon as possible. I am Sr, Your most humble Sert.

Walter Grosett Esqr has instructions from me to help the troops that will be quartered in Linlithgow and Borrostouness tonight. I also ask that you do your best, either by transporting them eastward or in any other way, as he will provide you with directions from the commanding officer. You should return to your post as soon as possible. I am Sr, your most humble servant.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Visitor.

To Capt Knight of the Happy Janet.

To Capt. Knight of the Happy Janet.

XVI

XVI

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

Edr 23d Decr 1745.

Edr Dec 23, 1745.

Sir,—I refer you to ye Generalls orders Now is the time to Exert your self at a dead pull. Home will shew you mine and the necessity of the troops moveing to Hadinton too Morrow, either on Horseback or put aboard—now Dr. Sr. Exert and get the Volunteers to exert in getting in the Horses, and theyll get full payment for their hire you must not notice[635] their march further yn yt place, else perhaps theyll not be so ready to give yr Horses. I am your Slave.

Dude,—I’m referring you to the General's orders. Now is the time to really push yourself hard. Home will show you mine and the need for the troops to move to Hadinton tomorrow, either on horseback or put aboard. Now, Doctor, please put in the effort and get the volunteers to help round up the horses, and they’ll receive full payment for their hire. You must not mention their march beyond that place, or they may not be so willing to provide your horses. I am at your service.

A. F.

A. F.

If you bring up ye rear youll haue the post of Honour.

If you bring up the rear, you'll have the position of honor.

You shall have intelligence all right.

You'll definitely have intelligence.

XVII

XVII

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

(Holograph but not signed)

Holograph, but not signed

Ed. 23 Decr 1745.

Ed. 23 Dec 1745.

Dear Sir,—I red yours about 7 at night, and you have done Exceeding well, if you bring up the Rear right I think you should Command those that command you now. I have no notion of shipping any Horses, they are in no danger, the men may be landed at Northberwick Dumbar or Heymouth[636] as the wind serves, or even at Holy Island if they cannot land Sooner wt Safety, but yt is only my private opinion, the ordor of ye proper Officers is the Rule.

Dear Sir,,—I received yours around 7 at night, and you've done extremely well. If you keep everything in order, I think you should be in charge of those who are currently in charge of you. I have no intention of shipping any horses; they are not in danger. The men can be landed at Northberwick, Dumbar, or Heymouth[636] as the wind allows, or even at Holy Island if they can't land safely sooner, but that's just my personal opinion; the orders of the proper officers are the standard.

[Pg 391]

[Pg 391]

The Shipping was chiefly designed for the Baggage seek and weak, and the Ships may be employed to bring Oats etc. for G. Wades Armye.

The shipping was mainly intended for the baggage of the needy and vulnerable, and the ships can be used to transport oats and other supplies for G. Wade's army.

XVIII

18

The Earl of Home to Walter Grossett

The Earl of Home to Walter Grossett

Linlithgow tuesday Morning
24th Decr near One O clock 1745.

Linlithgow Tuesday morning
24th Dec, near 1 o'clock 1745.

The three Companys being Warm’d with the Same Zeal with those of Glasgow are willing to Share the Same fate with them and have March’d to Borrostouness to go on board, So I must desire you to have them put on Board with all expedition, and I dont doubt of your doing every thing in your power for the accomadation of Men who deserve it So well. I am in haste Yours

The three Companies, fired up with the same enthusiasm as those from Glasgow, are ready to share the same fate and have marched to Borrostouness to board the ship. So, I need you to get them on board as quickly as possible, and I have no doubt you'll do everything you can to accommodate these deserving men. I'm in a hurry. Yours

Home.

Home.

I have not had any farther accounts.

I haven't received any further updates.

To Mr. Groset.

To Mr. Groset.

XIX

19

Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett

Lt. Gen. Guest to Walter Grossett

By Joshua Guest Esqr. Lieut. General of His Majesty’s Forces etc. etc.

By Joshua Guest Esq. Lieutenant General of His Majesty’s Forces etc. etc.

I desire you will go to Borrostouness and take whatever Cannon you may find in that Town or aboard the Ships in the Harbour, and send them here for the Defence of this City, and your Receipt for what number you Receive shall be Allowed by me, for doing whereof this shall be to you and all Concerned a sufficient warrant.

I want you to go to Borrostouness and take any cannons you find in that town or on the ships in the harbor, and send them here to defend this city. I’ll approve your receipt for the number you receive, and this will serve as a sufficient warrant for you and everyone involved.

Given at Edinburgh the 1st January 1745.

Given in Edinburgh on January 1, 1745.

Jos: Guest.

Jos: Visitor.

To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

To Walter Grosett, Esq. Collector of His Majesty’s Customs.

[Pg 392]

[Pg 392]

XX

XX

The Lord Justice Clerk and Major-General Huske to Walter Grossett and others

The Lord Justice Clerk and Major-General Huske to Walter Grossett and others

Leith 8 Jan. 1746.

Leith, January 8, 1746.

Whereas Some Matts of Flax are requisite for his Majestys Service You are hereby authorised to take aboard of the Transports now employed in his Majestys Service Such a number of Matts of Flax from aboard of a Dutch Sloop laying in the road of Leith for wch you are to give your Receipt, as you judge necessary for his Majestys Service. Given day and date forsaid.

Whereas some mats made of flax are necessary for His Majesty's service, you are hereby authorized to take aboard the transports currently employed in His Majesty's service a quantity of mats from a Dutch sloop docked in the road of Leith, for which you should provide your receipt as you see fit for His Majesty's service. Given on the date mentioned above.

And Fletcher.
John Huske.

To the Officer Commanding the Troops
or the Comander of ye Transports
now employed in his Majestys Service
or Walter Groset Esqr.

And Fletcher.
John Huske.

To the Officer in Charge of the Troops
for the Commander of the Transports
currently serving in His Majesty's Service
or Walter Groset, Esq.

XXI

XXI

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

Sr,—I red your Letter of yesterday noon off the nuik, I am sorry you came so late, however as you have done something, and if you meet wt no loss, all is well. The inclosed from G. Hawley to Coll. Leighton is wt orders to return in case nothing of importance can be done wt Safety. The oyr for Genll Blackney from Gnll Hawley, we wish could be delivered and an answer got as upon it depends matters of great Consequence, So I do not question youll exert your Invention. Matters are prepareing for a March. My Compliments and best wishes to all freinds wt you. Yours etc.

Sr.,—I read your letter from yesterday noon off the nook. I'm sorry you arrived so late, but since you've done something and if you're not at a loss, that's good. The enclosed letter from G. Hawley to Col. Leighton has instructions to return if nothing important can be done safely. The other letter for General Blackney from General Hawley, we wish could be delivered and we could get a response because great matters depend on it. So, I have no doubt you'll use your creativity. Preparations are being made for a march. My best regards and wishes to all your friends. Yours, etc.

A. F.

A. F.

[Pg 393]

[Pg 393]

Edinbr Friday 12 aclock 10th Jany 1746.

Edinburgh, Friday, January 10, 1746.

XXII

XXII

Lieutenant-General Hawley to Major-General Blackeney.

Lt. Gen. Hawley to Maj. Gen. Blackeney.

Edinborow 10th Jan: 1745-6.

Edinburgh, January 10, 1745-6.

Sr,—I had a verball message from you by a man this morning desyring reliefe. I am getting the foot, who are come up, repaired as soone as possible, for withe the nine days marche, after all things others they are good deale harrased butt in good spiritts.

Senior,—I received a verbal message from you this morning through a man asking for help. I’m getting the troops who have come up ready as soon as possible, because after the nine days march, despite everything else, they are quite worn out but in good spirits.

I shall move towards you, if possible a Sunday, in the meantime let me know by the bearer or some other way, how long you can hold out, no more now but that I am sinceerly yrs.

I’ll try to come to you, hopefully on a Sunday. In the meantime, please let me know through the messenger or another way how long you can wait. Nothing more for now except that I am sincerely yours.

H. C. Hawley.

H. C. Hawley.

XXIII

XXIII

Permit from Lord Justice Clerk for Walter Grossett

Permission from Lord Justice Clerk for Walter Grossett

Edenburgh the 26 Janr 1746.

Edinburgh, January 26, 1746.

Permitt Mr. Grosert and oyrs with him to pass and repass at the west port of Edr the Same being for his Majestys Special Service.

Permit Mr. Grosert and those with him to go back and forth at the west gate of Edr, as it is for His Majesty's Special Service.

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To all Officers Civill and Military.

To all Civil and Military Officers.

XXIV

XXIV

Warrant from Lord Justice Clerk to all Officers of the Law

Order from the Lord Justice Clerk to all Law Enforcement Officers

Edinbr 30 Janr 1746.

Edinburgh 30 Jan 1746.

Whereas I am informed that James Drummond of Drummond commonly called the Duke of Perth with oyrs concerned in the present Rebellion are in or about ye House of Lundie in Fife These are therefore Granting warrant to all Officers of ye Law wt yr Assistants to search the said house of Lundie or any oyr houses [Pg 394]they have reason to Suspect ye said persons are and them haveing found to seize and apprehend them and detain them in sure Custody till thence Liberated by due Course of the Law, for wch this shall be to all and Sundry Concerned a Sufficent warrant.

I have been informed that James Drummond of Drummond, commonly known as the Duke of Perth, along with others involved in the current Rebellion, are at or near the House of Lundie in Fife. Therefore, I authorize all law enforcement officers and their assistants to search the House of Lundie or any other locations they believe these individuals might be. If they find them, they are to seize and apprehend them and keep them in secure custody until they are released by the proper legal process. This shall serve as a sufficient warrant for all parties involved. [Pg 394]

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

XXV

XXV

The Lord Justice Clerk to Captain Coren

The Lord Justice Clerk to Captain Coren

Sir,—I desire you will be assisting to Walter Grosert of Logie Esqr. one of his Majesties Justices of the peace in Executeing divers warrands wch he will show you when proper. Sir I am Your most Obedient humble Servant,

Mister,—I would like you to assist Walter Grosert of Logie, Esq., one of His Majesty's Justices of the Peace, in carrying out various orders that he will show you when the time is right. Sir, I am Your most obedient humble servant,

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

Edinburgh the 30th Janr 1746.

Edinburgh, January 30, 1746.

To Captain Coren or the Commanding officer of the party to go aboard the Bylander[637] at Leith.

To Captain Coren or the commanding officer of the team going aboard the Bylander at Leith.

XXVI

XXVI

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grosett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grosett

Edr., 1st Febr. 1745/6.

Edr., Feb 1, 1745/6.

Sir,—You are to proceed with the Bylander towards Higgins neuk and allowa and there assisted by Captain Coren and ye party you are to Search for Suspected persons, ammunition and provisions belonging to the Rebells of wch you have particular Notice, for wch this shall be sufficient warrand.

Mr.,—You are to take the Bylander to Higgins neuk and Allowa, and there, with the help of Captain Coren and his team, you are to search for suspected individuals, ammunition, and supplies belonging to the Rebels of which you have specific information. This shall serve as your sufficient warrant.

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To Walter Grosert of Logie one of his Majestys Justices of the Peace.

To Walter Grosert of Logie, one of His Majesty's Justices of the Peace.

P.S.—You are to acquaint Genll Hawley of what Success you have and take your further directions from him.

P.S.—You need to let Genll Hawley know about any successes you have and get your next instructions from him.

[Pg 395]

[Pg 395]

XXVII

XXVII

Lieutenant-General Hawley to ——

Lieutenant-General Hawley to ——

Stirling 2d February 1745/6.

Stirling, February 2, 1745/46.

Sir,—As to the eight or nine persons you have Prisoners of the Rebells, you’l deliver them to the Corporal Who gives you this. The Meal, Bread, and Money etc. which the Rebells Left at Alloa you’l immediatly Secure for His Majesties use, for the Doing of which this Shall be to you a Sufficient Warrant.

Dude,—Regarding the eight or nine people you have as prisoners of the rebels, you will hand them over to the corporal who is giving you this message. The food, bread, and money, etc., that the rebels left at Alloa should be secured immediately for His Majesty's use, and this note will serve as your sufficient warrant for doing so.

H. C. Hawley.

H. C. Hawley.

P.S.—If you can Secure the person who Released the Officer Send him prisoner hither.

P.S.—If you can find the person who let the Officer go, send him here as a prisoner.

XXVIII

XXVIII

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

Edn the 8 Febr 1746.

Ed on Feb 8, 1746.

Sr,—I desire yuell go wt ye utmost Expedition to give his Royall Highness an actt of the prince of Hesse’s arrival with the Hessians, they came from Williamstadt on Tuesday last, they have the Hazzars aboard, and you are to desire to know the Dukes directions where they are to be landed, as none of them can be landed this night, ys actt I have from Coll. Stewart who is just arrived. Mentione every thing is prepareing for the Reception of the prince, and getting bread and forrage for the troops. I am Yours etc.

Sr.,—I need you to go with the utmost speed to inform his Royal Highness about the arrival of the Prince of Hesse and the Hessians. They came from Williamstadt last Tuesday, and they have the Hazzars on board. You should ask for the Duke's instructions on where they are to be landed, as none of them can be disembarked tonight. I got this information from Colonel Stewart, who has just arrived. Mention that everything is being prepared for the reception of the prince, including provisions and fodder for the troops. I am Yours, etc.

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To Walter Groset Esqr. at Leith.

To Walter Groset, Esq. in Leith.

The ammunition is gone by Stirlinge.

The ammo is gone by Stirlinge.

XXIX

XXIX

The Same to the Same

Same as before

Edr 11th Febr 1746.

Ed 11th Feb 1746.

Sr,—Upon receipt of this I desire yeull visite all the ports on the Forth where Coals are shipped, and agree[Pg 396] for Coals being transported for the use of ye army by Sea to Montrose, and to report to me by Express what agreements you make and to what extent wt ye ships name and masters names. I am Sr Your most humble Servant,

Sr.,—Once you receive this, I want you to visit all the ports on the Forth where coal is shipped, and arrange for coal to be transported by sea for the army to Montrose. Please report back to me by express mail about the agreements you make and the details regarding the ships and their captains. I am Sr Your most humble Servant,

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To Walter Groset Esqr Collector of the Customs at Allowa.

To Walter Groset Esq, Collector of Customs at Allowa.

XXX

XXX

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett

Edinburgh 11th Mar: 1746.

Edinburgh, March 11, 1746.

Sir,—You or any having your Authority are hereby Impowered to Contract with any persons you think proper for Ten boats to be employed in His Majestys Service in carrying provisions and other necessarys to the Army, and for which you shall have the proper protections.

Dude,—You, or anyone with your authority, are authorized to make contracts with any individuals you deem appropriate for ten boats to be used in His Majesty's service for transporting provisions and other necessities to the Army, and for which you will receive the necessary protections.

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To Walter Grosett Esqr, Collector of the Customs at Alloa.

To Walter Grosett Esqr, Collector of the Customs at Alloa.

XXXI

XXXI

Brigadier-General Price to the Duke of Newcastle

Brigadier-General Price to the Duke of Newcastle

My Lord,—I have the honour to acquaint Your Grace that I received an Information from I think a pretty sure hand That Corn from Northumberland and the Adjacent Countys which formerly was brought to this Market is now carryed to that of Wooler a Town fourteen miles from hence and immediatly bought there which if my intelligence is right carryed westward between Stirling and Dunbarton Castle for the use of the Rebels. Of this I last post sent notice to Major General Blackney at Stirling how it is carryed forward from thence My Information does not say but I supposed to be embarked on the River Clyde and sent through the Western Islands to Lochaber which may easily be prevented by small arm’d boats crusing there or if sent in boats by Lockloman and[Pg 397] so conveyed into the hills may be prevented by the Argyle and Breadalbine people doing their duty. I am now looking out for a trusty person to be employed about Wooler in hopes to trace this matter to a Certainty which as soon as I can do shall not faile of acquainting Your Grace with it.

My Lord,—I have the honor to inform Your Grace that I received reliable information that corn from Northumberland and the nearby counties, which was previously brought to this market, is now being taken to Wooler, a town fourteen miles away, where it is being bought immediately. If my information is correct, it is then transported westward between Stirling and Dunbarton Castle for the use of the rebels. In my last post, I alerted Major General Blackney in Stirling about how it is being moved from there. My source does not specify how, but I suspect it is being loaded onto the River Clyde and sent through the Western Islands to Lochaber, which could easily be stopped by small armed boats patrolling the area. Alternatively, if sent in boats via Loch Lomond and then taken into the hills, it could be prevented by the people of Argyle and Breadalbane fulfilling their duty. I am currently seeking a trustworthy person to operate in Wooler, hoping to get more concrete information on this matter, which I will certainly inform Your Grace about as soon as I can.

I should be mighty glad to receive Your Grace’s Commands how to proceed in this affair It wou’d give me the greatest pleasure Could I be Instrumental in bringing these Villanous Banditte to their Condign punishment. I am etc.

I would be very happy to receive your guidance on how to proceed with this matter. It would give me great pleasure to play a role in bringing these villainous bandits to their deserved punishment. I am etc.

Jno Price.

Jno Price.

Berwick Sunday
March the 16th 1745/6.

Berwick Sunday
March 16, 1745/46.

XXXII

XXXII

Walter Grossett to the Lord Justice Clerk

Walter Grossett to the Lord Justice Clerk

My Lord,—Agreeable to what your Lordship recommended to me with respect to what Brigdr Price acquainted His Grace the Duke of Newcastle in his Letter of the 16th Instant, that Corns bought at Wooler was according to his Intelligence, carried Westwards between Stirling and Dunbarton etc. I immediatly set out for Stirling and from that went across the Country towards Dunbarton and Glasgow and from thence by the Banks of the River Clyde to this place. Upon my arrival here I found along with Sir John Schaw, Mr. Hammilton who has the Commission from keeping out the Irish Corns from this Country and who agreeable to your directions to Sir John Schaw, had Just come there from a Survey he had made along the Coast of Galloway, to prevent the Rebels from getting Supply from that part of the Country and from what Mr. Hamilton tells me and I have otherwise Informed my self off I can now assure your Lordship that if Corns have been carried from Wooler Westward, no part of these Corns have been carried to the Rebels, and that they have not been supplyed with Provisions of any sort from this part of the Country. I thought it my Duty to take the first opportunity to acquaint your Lordship of this, and shall without fail be with you again on Munday to receive your further[Pg 398] commands. Till then I beg to be allowed the Honour to remain with the greatest respect and Esteem etc.

My Lord,—Following your Lordship's advice about what Brigadier Price informed His Grace, the Duke of Newcastle, in his letter dated the 16th of this month, regarding the corn bought at Wooler which, according to his information, was transported westward between Stirling and Dunbarton, I immediately set out for Stirling. From there, I traveled across the countryside towards Dunbarton and Glasgow, and then followed the banks of the River Clyde to this location. Upon my arrival, I found Sir John Schaw along with Mr. Hamilton, who has been tasked with keeping Irish corn out of this country. He had just come from a survey he conducted along the Galloway coast to stop the rebels from getting supplies from that area. Based on what Mr. Hamilton told me and what I've gathered from my own inquiries, I can now assure your Lordship that if corn has been transported from Wooler westward, none of it has reached the rebels, and they have not received any provisions from this part of the country. I felt it was my duty to inform your Lordship of this at the earliest opportunity, and I will definitely be with you again on Monday to receive your further[Pg 398] instructions. Until then, I humbly request the honor of remaining with the utmost respect and esteem, etc.

W. G.

W.G.

Greenock 30th Mar. 1746.

Greenock, March 30, 1746.

XXXIII

XXXIII

Earl of Home to Walter Grossett

Earl of Home to Walter Grossett

Edinburgh 14th Ap: 1746.

Edinburgh April 14, 1746.

As the Service requires Transports and Provisions for carrying four Hundered Men to Inverness I desire you will with the utmost Expedition provide proper Transports and lay in the usual Provision for four Hundered Men for thirty dayes and the Charges you may on that account be put to I hereby Oblige my self to pay the same to your order.

As the Service needs transport and supplies to move four hundred men to Inverness, I ask that you quickly arrange appropriate transport and stock up on the usual provisions for four hundred men for thirty days. I promise to cover any costs you incur for this.

Home.

Home.

To Walter Grosett Esqr.

To Walter Grosett Esq.

XXXIV

XXXIV

Walter Grossett to Masters of Transports

Walter Grossett to Masters of Transports

Leith 19th Aprile 1746.

Leith, April 19, 1746.

Sir,—I have Now Imployed your Vessell the       of the Burthen of       Tons as a Transport in his Majestys Service for which you are to have Ten Shillings p Ton Monthly for one Month Certain and thereafter Proportionaly so long as you are Continued in the Service.

Mr.,—I have now employed your vessel with a capacity of ___ tons as a transport in His Majesty's service, for which you will receive ten shillings per ton monthly for one month guaranteed, and then proportionally as long as you remain in service.

You are therefor to Proceed from the Harbour of Leith with the Recovered Men and Provisions Onboard, Directly to Inverness and there follow the Directions of his Royl Highness the Duke of Cumberland or those acting under him as to their Landing, and you are to be free after Landing the Men and Provisions unless Longer continued in the Service by orders as Above. I am, Sir, Yours etc.

You are therefore to leave the Harbor of Leith with the Recovered Men and Supplies on board, directly headed to Inverness, and there follow the instructions of His Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland or those acting on his behalf regarding their landing. You will be free after landing the Men and Supplies unless you are ordered to continue in service as stated above. I am, Sir, yours etc.

Wat: Grosett.

What: Grosett.

List of the Ships Imployed as Transpts

List of the Ships Used as Transports

Ann—Thomas Masterman 100 Janet—George Dougall 110
Speedwell—Robt Laurence 81 Jean—John Roxburgh 50
[Pg 399]

XXXV

XXXV

Notes of Lieutenant Dickson to the Lord Justice-Clerk forwarded to Walter Grossett

Notes from Lieutenant Dickson to the Lord Justice-Clerk sent to Walter Grossett

Having received His Royal Highness the Dukes Orders to Apply to Lord Justice Clerk for his Assistance in providing Carriages or other Conveyances for the Cloathing of Majr General Wolfe’s Regimt from Leith to Perth. I have Complied with the Above Order this 13 July 1746.

Having received instructions from His Royal Highness the Duke to ask the Lord Justice Clerk for assistance in providing carriages or other transportation for the clothing of Major General Wolfe’s regiment from Leith to Perth, I have complied with this order on July 13, 1746.

Wm. Dickson.
Lieut in Genl Wolfe’s Regimt.

Wm. Dickson.
Lieutenant in General Wolfe’s Regiment.

Would you have the Cloathing carried by Sea or Land?

Would you like the clothing to be transported by sea or land?

A. F.

A. F.

If the Conveyance by Water all the Way to Perth is not uncertain in point of time, it is the most easy and less expensive Method; but if the time of making the passage is uncertain, I must of necessity take the Means of Carriages by Land from Kinghorn.

If the journey by water to Perth is reliable in terms of timing, it’s the easiest and cheapest way to go; but if the timing is unpredictable, I’ll have to use land transportation from Kinghorn.

W. D.

W. D.

Edr 13th July 1746. 12 at Noon.

Edr July 13, 1746. 12 PM.

Mr. Groset

Mr. Groset

Sir, pray go to Leith with the above Mr. Dickson and Settle the carriage of the Above Cloathing in the best manner. I herewith deliver you a Letter to Baillie Hamilton in Kinghorn to prouide Carriages; after viewing the Parcells yuell be able to judge what carriages will be wanting which yuell add to my Letter wt ye time when required and the Carriages may proceed night and day till they arrive at perth. Ys from Sr Your humble Sert

Mr., please go to Leith with Mr. Dickson mentioned above and arrange for the transportation of the clothing in the best way possible. I'm including a letter to Baillie Hamilton in Kinghorn to arrange for transport; after you review the packages, you’ll be able to determine what additional transportation is needed, which you can add to my letter when necessary. The transport can go both night and day until it arrives in Perth. Yours sincerely, Your humble servant.

And Fletcher.

And Fletcher.

To Walter Grosett Esqr.

To Walter Grosett Esq.

[Pg 400]

[Pg 400]

Extract of the REPORT of Sir Everard Fawkener, Secretary to H.R.H. the Duke, and of John Sharpe, Esqr., Solicitor to the Treasury, to the Right Honble. the Lords Commissioners thereof relating to Mr. Grosett’s Services to the Government in the late Rebellion.

Extract of the REPORT from Sir Everard Fawkener, Secretary to H.R.H. the Duke, and John Sharpe,Treasury, to the Right Honorable the Commissioners of the Lords regarding Mr. Grosett’s services to the Government during the recent Rebellion.

May it please Your Lordships

May it please you, Your Lordships

In obeidience to your Lordships Commands we have Examd. the two Accompts of Walter Grosett Esqr. and from the Certificate of the Lord Justice Clerk and all the Generals who Commanded in Scotland, relating to these Accompts, it appears to us, that Mr. Grosett was employed in the following Service of the Government, from the first breaking out of the Rebellion to the Suppression thereof, Vizt.

In accordance with your Lordship's instructions, we have examined the two accounts of Walter Grosett, Esquire. From the certificate of the Lord Justice Clerk and all the generals who commanded in Scotland regarding these accounts, it seems to us that Mr. Grosett was involved in the following government service from the initial outbreak of the rebellion to its suppression:

That upon the Rebells at Pearth having formed a designe to surprize Edinburgh by getting across the River Forth in Boats and vissibly[638] as they had done in the year 1715, Mr. Grosett with the assistance of the Kings Sloops and Boats stationed at Dunbar, Leith, and Several other places on the Coast, and which were put under his Directions as a Justice of the Peace, removed all the Ships, Boats and Vessells from the North to the South side of the Forth, notwithstanding of the Rebells being at that time in possession of the North side of that River, and thereby prevented their putting in Execution what they had projected as aforesaid.

That after the rebels in Perth planned to surprise Edinburgh by crossing the River Forth in boats, just as they had done in 1715, Mr. Grosett, with the help of the King's sloops and boats stationed at Dunbar, Leith, and several other places along the coast, which he oversaw as a Justice of the Peace, moved all the ships, boats, and vessels from the north to the south side of the Forth. This was done despite the rebels being in control of the north side of the river at the time, effectively preventing them from carrying out their plan as stated.

That he was almost constantly Employed in disapointing the designs of the Rebells, getting inteligence of their motions, and giving inteligence thereof to the Generals Officers both before and after the Battle of Prestonpans.

That he was almost constantly busy disrupting the plans of the rebels, gathering information about their movements, and informing the generals and officers both before and after the Battle of Prestonpans.

That he conducted an Attempt for releasing several[Pg 401] Officers who were in the Custody of the Rebells, and had been made prisoners at the Battle of Prestonpans, in which he succeeded.

That he made an effort to free several[Pg 401] officers who were in the custody of the rebels and had been captured at the Battle of Prestonpans, in which he was successful.

That upon the Rebells sudden retraite from England, Mr. Grosett was employed by Lord Justice Clerk and Genl. Guest, to get the Troops transported in the most Expeditious manner from Stirling, and the Cannon from on Board the Ships at Borrowstonness to Edinburgh, for the defence thereof, the Rebells being at this time within a days march of that Town and by which means they were prevented from getting again possession of that important place.

That when the rebels suddenly retreated from England, Mr. Grosett was tasked by Lord Justice Clerk and General Guest to quickly transport the troops from Stirling, and to move the cannons from the ships at Borrowstonness to Edinburgh for its defense, with the rebels being just a day's march from that town. This effort prevented them from regaining control of that important location.

That he on Several occasions provided Vessells, rais’d the well Affected Country people, embarked Souldiers, and conducted Several Expeditions upon the Forth, to surprize the Rebells and retard their intended Siege of Stirling Castle, in which he succeeded; as also in destroying by the Dukes Command, the Magazines belonging to the Rebells on the North side of the Forth and who on that occasion took several of the Rebells prisoners and sent them to his R.H. then at Stirling.

That he on several occasions provided vessels, rallied the loyal local people, recruited soldiers, and led several missions on the Forth to surprise the rebels and delay their planned siege of Stirling Castle, which he accomplished; as well as destroying by the Duke's command, the supplies belonging to the rebels on the north side of the Forth, and during that time captured several of the rebels and sent them to his Royal Highness then at Stirling.

That he procured several Boats and Vessells to attend ye Army with provisions and other necessary’s as it march’d along the Coaste, to attack the Rebells at Culloden (where his younger Brother Captain Grosett was barbarously murdered) he also procured Pilotts to go with Commodore Smith to the Orkneys to prevent the Rebells there joining these at Culloden, and assisted Lord Justice Clerk in procuring whatever was found necessary for the Army, and for the Service of the Governmt. at the Critical Juncture.

He arranged for several boats and vessels to support the army with supplies and other essentials as it marched along the coast to confront the rebels at Culloden (where his younger brother, Captain Grosett, was brutally murdered). He also hired pilots to accompany Commodore Smith to the Orkneys to prevent the rebels there from joining those at Culloden and helped Lord Justice Clerk in obtaining whatever was necessary for the army and for the government's service at that critical moment.

That Mr. Grosett was appointed by His Grace the Duke of Newcastle to transact the Affairs of the Government in Scotland relating to the Rebellion, and to find out and collect the Evidence against the Rebells, and to keep a constant Corespondence with His Grace and Mr. Sharpe in all such matters as might require it, with assurance that the expense thereof, and of the Witnesses sent up to Town shd. be defrayed, and that care would be taken of his having a Suitable Satisfaction for his trouble.

That Mr. Grosett was appointed by His Grace the Duke of Newcastle to handle the government's affairs in Scotland regarding the rebellion, gather evidence against the rebels, and keep regular communication with His Grace and Mr. Sharpe on any relevant issues, with the assurance that the cost of this, as well as expenses for the witnesses sent to the city, would be covered, and that he would be properly compensated for his efforts.

[Pg 402]

[Pg 402]

That it appears to us from the Certificate of the Lord Justice Clerk, that Mr. Grosett being employed on behalf of the Governt. from the first breaking out of the Rebelling, and his Acting in so open and remarkable a manner in the Service of the Government, created against him the particular ill will of the Jacobites and their adherents, who on that Acct. took every opertunity of shewing their resentment against him, they Plundered his House in Town and in the Country, and carried of Effects to a very great Value, they drove all the Cattle from of his Estate, forced the payment of the Rents thereof to them, Stript his Wife and Children of the very Cloaths they had on, and used them otherwise in a moste inhumain manner.

It appears to us from the Certificate of the Lord Justice Clerk that Mr. Grosett was employed on behalf of the Government from the first outbreak of the Rebellion, and his open and notable actions supporting the Government earned him the particular animosity of the Jacobites and their supporters. Because of this, they took every opportunity to express their resentment towards him. They looted his house in both the city and the countryside, taking valuable belongings, drove all the livestock from his estate, forced him to pay rents to them, stripped his wife and children of the clothes they were wearing, and treated them in the most inhumane manner.

That as to the Several Sums charged for Expenses in those Services, Mr. Grosett has not in any of his accompts charged anything for the Extraordinary trouble and fatigue he underwent, but only for the sums he actually expended, and tho’ he has advanced above £5000 in these Services he has not charged the Governmt. anything on the Head of Interest.

That regarding the various amounts billed for expenses in those services, Mr. Grosett has not listed any charges for the extra trouble and stress he experienced, but only for the amounts he actually spent. Although he has invested over £5000 in these services, he hasn't charged the government anything for interest.

Upon the whole it appears to us, that during the late unfortunate rebellion, Mr. Grosett was employed in several services of the greatest trust and confidence, and which required great prudence, resolution and activity in the execution of them, and that he executed the same, with great care, exactness and ability and that he continued his services to the government after the suppression of the rebellion with equal ardour, zeal, activity and dilligence, and in the whole of his behaviour, he appeared to us to be actuated as much by his affection to the government as the duties of his office, and with regard to the articles of his accounts which remain unpaid and which amount to the sum of 3709£ 11s. we apprehend them reasonable, and therefore certify your Lordships that the said sum of 3709£ 11s. appears to us to be justified, due to him for the sums expended by him in the services aforesaid.

Overall, it seems to us that during the recent unfortunate rebellion, Mr. Grosett was involved in several highly trusted and important roles that required great caution, determination, and effort to carry out. He fulfilled these responsibilities with great care, accuracy, and skill, and he continued to serve the government with equal enthusiasm, dedication, and diligence even after the rebellion was suppressed. Throughout his actions, he seemed to be driven as much by his loyalty to the government as by the responsibilities of his position. Regarding the unpaid items in his accounts, which total £3,709 11s., we believe they are reasonable, and therefore we certify to your Lordships that this amount of £3,709 11s. seems justified and is owed to him for the expenses incurred in the aforementioned services.

(Signed) Everard Fawkener.
John Sharpe.

(Signed) Everard Fawkener.
John Sharpe.

6th February 1749.

February 6, 1749.

[Pg 403]

[Pg 403]


[Pg 405]

[Pg 405]

A SHORT ACCOUNT OF THE BATTLES OF PRESTON, FALKIRK, AND CULLODEN; BY ANDREW LUMISDEN, THEN PRIVATE SECRETARY TO PRINCE CHARLES; BY A GENTLEMAN WHO WAS IN THESE ACTIONS

OF THE BATTLE OF PRESTON, OR GLADESMUIR,

OF THE BATTLE OF PRESTON, OR GLADESMUIR,

fought September 21st, 1745

battled September 21st, 1745

Intelligence having been brought to the Prince, that Lieutenant General Cope, commander in chief of the government forces in Scotland, was landed at Dunbar, with the troops he embarked at Aberdeen, and was joined by Hamilton and Gardiner’s dragoons, he resolved to march directly and attack him.

Intelligence was reported to the Prince that Lieutenant General Cope, the commander of the government forces in Scotland, had landed at Dunbar with the troops he had brought from Aberdeen and was joined by Hamilton and Gardiner’s dragoons. He decided to march directly and attack him.

Accordingly on the 20th September, in the morning, the Prince put himself at the head of the army at Dudingston, and presenting his sword said—‘My friends I have flung away the scabbard.’ This was answered by a chearful huzza.

Accordingly, on September 20th, in the morning, the Prince took command of the army at Duddingston and, presenting his sword, said, "My friends, I've thrown away the scabbard." This was met with a cheerful cheer.

The army marched till they gained the top of Carberryhill, from whence we observed the enemy drawn up on the plain below, in order of battle. We continued the march along the brow of the hill, till we were opposite to the front of, and at half a miles distance from the enemy. Here the Highlanders gave a shout, by way of defiance, and nothing less than authority could restrain them from coming immediately to action.

The army marched until they reached the top of Carberryhill, from where we could see the enemy arranged on the plain below, ready for battle. We continued along the ridge of the hill until we were directly opposite the enemy, about half a mile away. At that point, the Highlanders shouted as a challenge, and only strict orders could stop them from rushing into action right away.

Several officers were sent, particularly Colonel Ker of Gradane, to reconnoitre the enemy’s camp. They reported that General Cope had got into a fastness, where it was impossible to attack him, without risking the loss of the whole army: That his right was drawn up to the high[Pg 406] walls of the gardens of Preston, where he had made several breaches to retire into, if needful: The house of Seton and a small morass on the left: An inclosure not half a gun shot over, surrounded with a ditch three or four feet deep, and five or six broad, covered his front; which made two ditches of that breadth and depth to pass: And the sea was in his rear, at no great distance from him: His canons and coehorns were planted on a high way that led to Tranent, between the above inclosure and morass. Thus his front was to the south, his rear to the north, his right to the west, and his left to the east.

Several officers were sent, especially Colonel Ker of Gradane, to scout the enemy's camp. They reported that General Cope had taken refuge in a stronghold, making it impossible to attack him without risking the loss of the entire army. His right was positioned up against the high walls of the gardens of Preston, where he had made several breaches to retreat into if necessary. The house of Seton and a small marsh were on the left. In front of him was an enclosure that was not even half a cannon shot wide, surrounded by a ditch three or four feet deep and five or six feet wide, requiring the crossing of two ditches of that size. The sea was directly behind him, not far off. His cannons and coehorns were set up on a road leading to Tranent, located between the aforementioned enclosure and marsh. Thus, his front faced south, his rear was to the north, his right was to the west, and his left was to the east.

In this situation what was to be done? It was about two o’clock in the after-noon. The Prince made several movements to amuse the enemy, and placed guards on the several roads that led to their camp. In the mean time General Cope discharged several canon at us, but without effect.

In this situation, what should be done? It was around two o’clock in the afternoon. The Prince made several moves to distract the enemy and stationed guards on the various roads leading to their camp. Meanwhile, General Cope fired several cannons at us, but it had no effect.

At twilight the Prince drew off his men, and marched to Tranent. From hence he detached Lord Nairne, with 500 men, to guard the road that led from Preston to Edinburgh, to prevent Cope from marching thither. On the other hand General Cope, afraid that the Prince should have directed his march eastwards, altered his disposition, and faced east, having now the morass in front; and his troops were thus disposed. General Hamilton’s dragoons were on his right, and Colonel Gardiners on his left. The regiment of Lascelle’s and Murray, with five companies of Lees and four of Guises formed the center. And his second line consisted of three companies of the Earl of Loudun’s regiment, two of Lord John Murray’s, a body of Monros, and a great number of recruits for regiments abroad. Amounting in all to about 2000 foot, and 700 dragoons.

At dusk, the Prince led his men away and marched to Tranent. From there, he sent Lord Nairne with 500 men to secure the road from Preston to Edinburgh to stop Cope from moving that way. Meanwhile, General Cope, worried that the Prince might have headed east, changed his strategy and faced east himself, with a swamp in front of him; this is how his troops were arranged. General Hamilton’s dragoons were positioned on his right, and Colonel Gardiner’s on his left. The center was made up of Lascelle’s and Murray's regiments, along with five companies of Lees and four of Guises. His second line included three companies from the Earl of Loudoun's regiment, two from Lord John Murray's, a group of Monros, and a large number of new recruits for regiments stationed abroad. In total, there were about 2,000 infantry and 700 dragoons.

As it was now dark, the Prince ordered the army to march and to take possession of the ground on the south east of the morass which they did, at about half canon shot of the enemy. We continued under arms in the order of march, observing the greatest silence, so that Cope did not perceive where we were.

As it was now dark, the Prince ordered the army to move out and take control of the area southeast of the swamp, which they did, at about half a cannon shot's distance from the enemy. We stayed armed in formation, keeping quiet so Cope wouldn't notice where we were.

[Pg 407]

[Pg 407]

About three o’clock of the morning of the 21st, orders were sent to Lord Nairne to draw off his guards and join the Prince, which he immediately did. The disposition of the attack being made, the Prince addressed his army in these words—‘Follow me, gentlemen, by the assistance of God, I will this day make you a free and happy people.’ The right wing was commanded by the Duke of Perth, Lieutenant General, and consisted of the Macdonalds of Clanranald, Glengary, Keppoch and Glenco, and Grants of Glenmoriston. The left wing was commanded by Lord George Murray, Lieutenant-General, and consisted of the Camerons of Lochiel, Stuarts of Appin, and two companies of Macgregors. The second line was commanded by Lord Nairne, Major-General, and consisted of Athole-men, Robertsons of Strouan, Maclauchlans, and the Duke of Perth’s men. About 25 gentlemen, and their servants, a horse-back, formed a sort of corps de reserve. The whole army consisted of about 2200 men.

Around three o’clock in the morning on the 21st, orders were sent to Lord Nairne to pull back his guards and join the Prince, which he did right away. Once the attack plan was set, the Prince addressed his army with these words—‘Follow me, gentlemen, with God’s help, I will make you a free and happy people today.’ The right wing was led by the Duke of Perth, Lieutenant General, and included the Macdonalds of Clanranald, Glengary, Keppoch, and Glenco, as well as the Grants of Glenmoriston. The left wing was commanded by Lord George Murray, Lieutenant General, and included the Camerons of Lochiel, Stuarts of Appin, and two companies of Macgregors. The second line was led by Lord Nairne, Major General, and consisted of Athole-men, Robertsons of Strouan, Maclauchlans, and the Duke of Perth’s men. About 25 gentlemen and their servants on horseback formed a kind of reserve corps. The entire army consisted of around 2200 men.

We marched chearfully on. The Duke of Perth was conducted by a gentleman, of the name of Anderson, by a ford through the above morass; where 100 men could have prevented our passage: it was so difficult that every step the men made they sunk to the knee in mud. This made them pass in some disorder, but not being observed, by means of the darkness, they formed again as they passed the morass. But the Duke of Perth, in place of inclining to the enemy’s left, to avoid being seen by them before all our men were passed, marched towards the sea: so when our left gained the plain, Lord George Murray found that he was nearer the enemy than the Duke of Perth was. However, day beginning to break the attack was ordered.

We marched on cheerfully. The Duke of Perth was guided by a man named Anderson through a ford in the swamp mentioned earlier, where 100 men could have blocked our way. It was so tough that with every step, the men sank to their knees in mud. This caused some chaos as they passed through, but since it was dark, they managed to regroup once they cleared the swamp. However, instead of moving toward the enemy’s left to avoid being spotted before all our men were through, the Duke of Perth headed toward the sea. So, when our left reached the plain, Lord George Murray realized he was closer to the enemy than the Duke of Perth was. As dawn began to break, the attack was ordered.

The highlanders, pulling off their bonnets and looking up to heaven, made a short prayer, and ran forward. In advancing Lord George Murray observed, that by the turn of the morass, there was a great interval between his left and the ditch of the before mentioned inclosure: he therefore ordered the Camerons to incline that way, in order to take it up, to prevent being flanked by the enemy’s[Pg 408] dragoons. By this movement there became a considerable interval in the center, which the 2d line was ordered to fill up. We were now discovered by the enemy, who played their artillery furiously upon our left; yet only one private man was killed, and one officer wounded. The highlanders ran on with such eagerness that they immediately seized the canon. The dragoons on right and left made a very regular fire, which was followed by close platoons of all their infantry, which our men received with great intrepidity. But what by the huzzas of the highlanders, and their fire which was very brisk, the dragoons were immediately thrown into disorder, which occasioned some confusion among their foot. The highlanders threw down their muskets, drew their swords, and carried all before them like a torrent: so that in seven or eight minutes both horse and foot were totally routed, and drove from the field of battle.

The highlanders took off their bonnets and looked up to the sky, murmuring a quick prayer before charging ahead. As they moved forward, Lord George Murray noticed that the bend in the marsh created a significant gap between his left side and the ditch of the mentioned enclosure. He therefore directed the Camerons to move that way to cover it, aiming to avoid being flanked by the enemy’s dragoons. This shift created a considerable gap in the center, which the 2d line was instructed to fill. The enemy spotted us and unleashed their artillery fiercely on our left; still, only one private was killed and one officer wounded. The highlanders sprinted forward with such enthusiasm that they quickly captured the cannon. The dragoons on both the right and left fired a precise volley, quickly followed by a close line of their infantry, which our men faced with great courage. However, the cheers of the highlanders and their rapid fire instantly threw the dragoons into disarray, leading to some confusion among their foot soldiers. The highlanders discarded their muskets, drew their swords, and surged forward like a flood: in just seven or eight minutes, both horse and foot were completely routed and driven from the battlefield.

The Prince during the action was on foot in the 2d line. He was with great difficulty prevailed on not to attack with the first line in so much that the officers refused to march if he insisted on it. As soon as the victory declared for him, he mounted his horse and put a stop to the slaughter, calling out,—‘make prisoners: spare them, spare them, they are my father’s subjects.’

The Prince was on foot in the second line during the action. He was very difficult to convince not to attack with the first line to the point that the officers refused to march if he insisted on it. As soon as victory was declared in his favor, he got on his horse and ordered an end to the slaughter, shouting, "Make prisoners: spare them, spare them, they are my father’s subjects."

When General Cope saw how things were going, and that he could not rally his forces, he, with about 350 dragoons, and some volunteer officers, gained Carberryhill, by a road that led to it from Preston, and, as we had not time, nor horse to pursue, got away undisturbed to Lauder, and from thence to Berwick.

When General Cope realized how things were unfolding and that he couldn't regroup his troops, he led about 350 dragoons and some volunteer officers to Carberryhill via a road from Preston. Since we didn't have the time or the horses to chase after them, they managed to escape without being disturbed to Lauder, and from there to Berwick.

As our 2d line had no occasion to engage, it may with justice be said, that 1400 highlanders, unsupported by horse or canon, routed a regular army of 2000 foot and 700 dragoons, defended by a fine train of artillery, and obtained a most compleat victory. Such is the impetuosity of a highland attack!

As our 2d line didn't have the chance to get involved, it's fair to say that 1400 Highlanders, without any cavalry or cannons, defeated a regular army of 2000 infantry and 700 dragoons, backed by a strong artillery support, and achieved a complete victory. That's the power of a Highland charge!

We took all the enemys canon, coehorns, small arms, colours, standards, drums, tents, baggage and military chest, in which was about 3000l. [Pg 409]11s.

We seized all the enemy's cannons, coehorns, small arms, colors, standards, drums, tents, baggage, and military chest, which contained about £3,000. [Pg 409]11s.

Of the enemy were killed about 500, wounded 400, and taken prisoners 1400. Among the prisoners were about 80 officers.

Of the enemy, around 500 were killed, 400 were wounded, and 1,400 were taken prisoner. Among the prisoners were about 80 officers.

Our loss was very inconsiderable, viz. killed 2 captains, 1 Lieutenant, 1 ensign, and about 30 private men; and wounded 6 officers, and 70 private men.

Our losses were quite minor: we lost 2 captains, 1 lieutenant, 1 ensign, and around 30 enlisted men; and 6 officers and 70 enlisted men were injured.

All care immaginable was taken of the wounded, plenty of able surgeons having been provided for that purpose.

All possible care was taken of the wounded, with plenty of skilled surgeons available for that purpose.

The Prince lay this night at Pinkie, and next day the 22d returned to the palace of Holyroodhouse, and the army encamped again at Duddingston.

The Prince spent the night at Pinkie, and the next day, the 22d, he went back to the palace of Holyroodhouse, while the army set up camp again at Duddingston.

OF THE BATTLE OF FALKIRK,

Falkirk Battle,

fought January 17th, 1746

fought January 17th, 1746

Lieutenant General Hawley, having been declared commander in chief in place of Sir John Cope, marched from Edinburgh to raise the siege of Stirling Castle, with about 10000 foot and 3 regiments of dragoons, and encamped a little to the westward of Falkirk.

Lieutenant General Hawley, appointed commander in chief instead of Sir John Cope, marched from Edinburgh to lift the siege of Stirling Castle, leading around 10,000 infantry and 3 regiments of dragoons, and set up camp just west of Falkirk.

On the 16th the Prince drew up his army in line of battle, on a muir or plain, a mile south east of the house of Bannockburn, then his head quarters, and made all the necessary dispositions, in case the enemy should have advanced to attack him. But Hawley continued all day in his camp, and in the evening the Prince ordered his men to their quarters.

On the 16th, the Prince lined up his army for battle on a moor or plain, a mile southeast of Bannockburn House, where his headquarters were located, and made all the necessary arrangements in case the enemy decided to attack. However, Hawley stayed in his camp all day, and in the evening, the Prince instructed his men to return to their quarters.

Early next morning, the 17th, the Prince ordered his men to draw up on the same plain. The right wing, commanded by Lord George Murray, consisted of the Macgregors, Macdonalds of Keppoch, Clanronald, Glengary, and Glenco, Mackintoshes and Farquharsons. The left, commanded by Lord John Drummond, consisted of the Camerons of Lochiel, Stuarts of Appin, Macphersons of Cluny, Frazers of Lovat, and Macleods of Raza and Bernera. The 2d line, commanded by Brigadier-General Stappleton, consisted of the regiments of the Duke of[Pg 410] Athole, Earl of Cromarty, Lord Lewis Gordon, and Lord Ogilvy. Lords Elcho and Balmerino with the Prince’s horse-guards, consisting of about 80 gentlemen and their servants, were placed on the right wing, between the first and second lines. Lords Pitsligo and Strathallan with the Aberdeen and Perth-shire squadrons of horse, and a few hussars, making about the same number, were placed in like manner on the left. The Irish pickets were placed immediately behind the 2d line as a corps de reserve. The whole making about 7000 foot, and 160 horse.

Early the next morning, the 17th, the Prince had his men form up on the same plain. The right wing, led by Lord George Murray, included the Macgregors, Macdonalds of Keppoch, Clanronald, Glengarry, and Glencoe, as well as the Mackintoshes and Farquharsons. The left wing, led by Lord John Drummond, consisted of the Camerons of Lochiel, Stuarts of Appin, Macphersons of Cluny, Fraziers of Lovat, and Macleods of Raza and Bernera. The 2nd line, commanded by Brigadier-General Stappleton, included the regiments of the Duke of[Pg 410] Athole, Earl of Cromarty, Lord Lewis Gordon, and Lord Ogilvy. Lords Elcho and Balmerino, along with the Prince’s horse guards, which consisted of about 80 gentlemen and their servants, were placed on the right wing between the first and second lines. Lords Pitsligo and Strathallan, with the Aberdeen and Perthshire squadrons of horse and a few hussars, making roughly the same number, were positioned similarly on the left. The Irish pickets were stationed immediately behind the 2nd line as a reserve corps. The total force consisted of about 7,000 foot soldiers and 160 cavalry.

The regiments of the Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Gordon of Glenbucket, and John Roy Stuart were left at Stirling to guard the trenches and push on the siege, being about 1000 men. The Duke of Perth, who commanded the siege, and John Roy Stuart were allowed to join the army to assist in the action: and the care of the siege was left to Major-General Gordon of Glenbucket.

The regiments of the Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Gordon of Glenbucket, and John Roy Stuart were stationed at Stirling to defend the trenches and continue the siege, totaling about 1000 men. The Duke of Perth, who led the siege, along with John Roy Stuart, were permitted to join the army to help with the action, while Major-General Gordon of Glenbucket took charge of the siege.

About midday the Prince, finding that Hawley did not advance, resolved in a council of war to march and attack him. The army therefore marched in order of battle, in two columns, keeping always an equal distance of about 200 yards. This saved a great deal of time, and prevented confusion, when we came within sight of the enemy. Lord George Murray took the road to the south of the Torwood, as the highway leading from Stirling to Falkirk was too narrow. At the same time Lord John Drummond went with most of the horse to reconnoitre the enemy; and made a movement as intending to march the highway through the Torwood.

Around noon, the Prince, noticing that Hawley wasn't moving forward, decided in a war council to march and attack him. The army then marched in battle formation, in two columns, maintaining a distance of about 200 yards between them. This saved a lot of time and avoided confusion when we got close to the enemy. Lord George Murray took the route south of the Torwood since the main road from Stirling to Falkirk was too narrow. Meanwhile, Lord John Drummond led most of the cavalry to scout the enemy and made a maneuver as if planning to march along the main road through the Torwood.

The army crossed the water of Carron at Dunipace. By this time the enemy were perceived to be in motion. We therefore quickened our march to gain the top of the hill, about a mile south of the town of Falkirk, and a little more from Hawley’s camp.

The army crossed the Carron River at Dunipace. By this point, we noticed the enemy was on the move. So, we sped up our march to reach the top of the hill, about a mile south of Falkirk and a bit farther from Hawley’s camp.

General Hawley’s disposition seems to have been thus. On his right were the Argyleshire militia, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, the regiments of foot of Ligonier, Price and Sinclair: on his left Ligonier, Cobham and Hamilton’s dragoons; the regiments of foot[Pg 411] of Wolfe, Cholmondly and Pulteney. The 2d line was made up of the regiments of foot of Blackney, Monro, Flemming, Barret and Battereau. The Glasgow and some other militia, and Howard’s regiment of foot formed a corps de reserve.

General Hawley's setup looked like this. On his right were the Argyleshire militia, led by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, along with the foot regiments of Ligonier, Price, and Sinclair; on his left were Ligonier, Cobham, and Hamilton’s dragoons, plus the foot regiments of Wolfe, Cholmondly, and Pulteney. The 2d line consisted of the foot regiments of Blackney, Monro, Flemming, Barret, and Battereau. The Glasgow militia and some others, along with Howard’s foot regiment, formed a reserve corps.[Pg 411]

Mr. Hawley, afraid lest the Prince intended to march south, and not come to an action, ordered the dragoons to advance with all expedition, to take possession of the hill, and to keep us in play till the infantry should come up. When they came within canon shot, they made a motion to attack our right in flank, which Lord George Murray perceiving he, with the assistance of Colonel John Roy Stuart, made a very quick motion till he gained a morass, by which he saved being flanked. So our right was to the east, our left west, and front north. The dragoons seeing their scheme thus disappointed, advanced on a full trot, in order to break us; but the Macgregors and Macdonalds, keeping up their fire till they were within pistol shot, received them so briskly, that they were immediately broken, and thrown into the utmost confusion. As the enemy’s foot were now very near, the dragoons could not easily retreat back, without breaking their own line: they therefore gallopped along our line, whereby a vast number of them were killed. This beginning greatly inspirited our men, as it had a contrary effect on the enemy.

Mr. Hawley, worried that the Prince planned to move south without engaging in battle, ordered the dragoons to charge forward quickly, take control of the hill, and keep us busy until the infantry arrived. When they got within cannon range, they tried to flank our right side, but Lord George Murray noticed this and, with Colonel John Roy Stuart's help, hurriedly moved to a marshy area to avoid being flanked. So, our right was on the east, our left on the west, and our front faced north. The dragoons, realizing their plan had been thwarted, charged at a full gallop to break our line; however, the Macgregors and Macdonalds kept firing until they were within pistol range, unleashing such a strong counter that the dragoons were quickly thrown into chaos. With the enemy's foot soldiers now very close, the dragoons found it hard to retreat without breaking their own formation, so they galloped along our line, leading to many of them being killed. This initial success greatly boosted our morale, contrasting sharply with the enemy's spirits.

Scarcely had the dragoons got off when their infantry advanced to make the attack. They greatly out-lined us on the left, as we out-lined them on the right. Our left extended little farther than to their center. But from the unequality of the ground, being interspersed with risings and hollows, whereby there was no seeing from right to left what was doing, neither of the parties reaped advantage from that circumstance. The enemy’s right therefore attacked our left with a very close fire, which the Camerons and Stuarts received with great fortitude, drew their swords, broke and pursued them out of the field. Then our left made a halt in order to be joined by the right; but were again attacked by other two regiments[Pg 412] in flank, whom they also immediately broke. Our right, marching down the hill, fell in with the Glasgow militia, whom they severely chastised.

As soon as the dragoons left, the infantry moved forward to launch their attack. They significantly outnumbered us on the left, just as we outnumbered them on the right. Our left barely extended past their center. However, due to the uneven terrain, which had rises and dips, neither side could fully see what was happening across the battlefield, so neither gained an advantage from this. The enemy’s right then launched a very close-range attack on our left, which the Camerons and Stuarts faced bravely. They drew their swords and charged, driving the enemy out of the field. Then our left paused to regroup with the right but was quickly attacked again by two other regiments from the side, which they also routed. Meanwhile, our right moved down the hill and came into contact with the Glasgow militia, whom they defeated decisively.[Pg 412]

The Prince, who was mostly in the center, and whose attention was turned to all parts, observing some regiments of the enemys foot, and the remainder of the dragoons, marching up the hill, put himself at the head of the Irish pickets, and such of the scattered highlanders as were nearest to him, with a few gentlemen a horse-back, and advanced to attack them. But seeing the order of the pickets, and having a great storm of wind and rain in their faces, they fled precipitantly to their camp, as did all the rest of their troops.

The Prince, who was mostly in the center and paying attention to everything around him, noticed some enemy foot regiments and the rest of the dragoons marching up the hill. He took charge of the Irish pickets and the nearby scattered highlanders, along with a few gentlemen on horseback, and moved forward to attack them. However, seeing the formation of the pickets and facing a strong wind and rain, they quickly retreated to their camp, along with the rest of their troops.

As the action began late in the afternoon, it was now dark, the storm still continuing. However, the Prince made all the dispatch immaginable to put his troops in order, as he intended to beat the enemy from their camp. But hardly were the half of our men drawn together, when we observed many fires in Hawley’s camp, and his men at the same time marching, with great hurry, between the camp and town of Falkirk. We immediately conjectured that they were burning their camp (which they indeed endeavoured, but were prevented by the rain) and were to take possession of the town of Falkirk. Had they taken this course, a few men properly posted could have hindered the highlanders from entering that night, and obliged us either to have abandoned the field of battle, or to have stood all night under arms, wet and fatigued as we were, and exposed to the inclemency of the weather, a thing impossible.

As the action started late in the afternoon, it was now dark, and the storm was still going strong. However, the Prince made every effort possible to organize his troops because he intended to defeat the enemy at their camp. But just as we had gathered half of our men, we noticed several fires in Hawley’s camp and his troops quickly moving between the camp and the town of Falkirk. We immediately guessed that they were trying to set their camp on fire (which they actually tried to do but couldn’t because of the rain) and intended to take over the town of Falkirk. If they had gone through with this plan, a few strategically placed men could have kept the highlanders from entering that night, forcing us to either abandon the battlefield or stand ready all night, wet and exhausted, and exposed to the harsh weather, which would have been impossible.

Mr. Drummond, now Lord Strathallan, and Mr. Oliphant younger of Gask, disguised in peasants dress, went into the town to reconnoitre, and to get intelligence of the enemy. They soon returned with information, that they were flying in confusion to Linlithgow. The Prince immediately ordered his men to march, and attack them in the rear. As we marched we fell on the enemy’s canon, which they had left between the field of battle and the town: they could not draw them up the hill, on account of the[Pg 413] badness of the roads; so they were of no use to them in the action.

Mr. Drummond, now Lord Strathallan, and Mr. Oliphant, the younger of Gask, disguised in peasant clothing, went into town to scout and gather information about the enemy. They quickly returned with news that the enemy was fleeing in chaos to Linlithgow. The Prince immediately ordered his men to march and attack them from behind. As we moved out, we came across the enemy's cannons, which they had left between the battlefield and the town; they couldn't move them up the hill because of the poor condition of the roads, so they were useless to them in the fight.

The enemy’s rear were just got to the east end of the town, when Lord John Drummond entered it on that side: he was shot throw the arm by a soldier, whom he was taking prisoner. Lord George Murray entered at the middle, and Lochiel at the west end of the town.

The enemy's rear had just reached the east side of the town when Lord John Drummond entered from that side: he was shot through the arm by a soldier he was trying to take prisoner. Lord George Murray entered in the middle, and Lochiel came in from the west end of the town.

Our men had no sooner entered the town than they disappeared on all sides; every one putting himself under cover to dry his cloaths; and refresh himself after the fatigue of the day: and altho a detachment of 1000 men were ordered to pursue the enemy, yet, such is the misfortune of an irregular army! not 50 could be brought together, besides those absolutely necessary to mount the guards for the Prince and their own safeties. So the enemy never stopped till they got to Linlithgow, and some of their volunteers and dragoons to Edinburgh.

Our men had barely entered the town when they scattered in all directions, everyone finding shelter to dry their clothes and recharge after a long day. Although a group of 1,000 soldiers was ordered to chase down the enemy, such is the misfortune of an irregular army! Not even 50 could be gathered, aside from those needed to guard the Prince and ensure their own safety. As a result, the enemy kept going until they reached Linlithgow, with some of their volunteers and cavalry even making it to Edinburgh.

The Prince’s first care next morning was to send to reconnoitre the field of battle, and cause bury the dead, as well those of the enemy as his own men. Some of their officers that could be distinguished, of whom were Sir Robert Monroe and Colonel Whitney, were brought down to the town, and interred in the same manner as our own officers were.

The Prince's first priority the next morning was to send scouts to survey the battlefield and arrange for the burial of the dead, both enemy and his own troops. Some of the identifiable officers, including Sir Robert Monroe and Colonel Whitney, were taken to the town and buried in the same way as our own officers.

It now appeared that about 600 of the enemy were killed on the field of battle, and that we had made about 700 prisoners.

It now seemed that around 600 of the enemy were killed on the battlefield, and that we had taken about 700 prisoners.

We got all their artillery consisting of 7 large pieces of brass canon, and 3 iron ones, several mortars and coehorns, with a great many shells, all their ammunition, waggons, tents, 3 standards, 2 stand of colours, a kettle drum, many small arms, baggage, and generally every thing that the rain prevented them from burning.

We captured all their artillery, which included 7 large brass cannons, 3 iron cannons, several mortars and coehorns, a ton of shells, all their ammunition, wagons, tents, 3 flags, 2 sets of colors, a kettle drum, a lot of small arms, baggage, and pretty much everything that the rain stopped them from burning.

On our side were killed 3 captains, 4 subaltern officers, and about 40 private men: and we had wounded near double that number.

On our side, we lost 3 captains, 4 junior officers, and around 40 enlisted men; and we had nearly double that number injured.

[Pg 414]

[Pg 414]

OF THE BATTLE OF CULLODEN,

BATTLE OF CULLODEN,

fought April 16TH, 1746

fought April 16th, 1746

As soon as certain intelligence was brought that the Duke of Cumberland had begun his march from Aberdeen northwards, the Prince sent orders to Ross, Sutherland, Lochaber, and Badenoch, that all the detachments of his army, in these places, should join him immediately at Inverness.

As soon as it was confirmed that the Duke of Cumberland had started his march from Aberdeen heading north, the Prince ordered Ross, Sutherland, Lochaber, and Badenoch to have all the units of his army in those areas come to him right away in Inverness.

The Duke of Cumberland passed the Spey on the 13th, and on the 14th encamped at Nairn, about 10 miles from Culloden. On this the Prince assembled his men in and about Inverness, and marched at their head to Culloden-house, where he lay that night, and the troops encamped in the Parks.

The Duke of Cumberland crossed the Spey on the 13th, and on the 14th set up camp at Nairn, about 10 miles from Culloden. In response, the Prince gathered his men in and around Inverness and led them to Culloden House, where he stayed that night, and the troops camped in the Parks.

Early next morning, the Prince drew up his army in line of battle, upon Drummossie muir, south of the house and parks of Culloden, as he expected that the Duke of Cumberland would have attacked him that day, being his birth-day.

Early the next morning, the Prince lined up his army for battle on Drummossie moor, south of the house and parks of Culloden, as he anticipated that the Duke of Cumberland would attack him that day, since it was his birthday.

About noon, when we were informed that he had not moved, it was proposed to the Prince to make a night attack upon him, in his camp at Nairn. Various were the reasons for and against this proposal. And after considering them fully, the Prince approved of the project, as the most probable chance he had of beating the enemy; provided they could be surprised by one o’clock of the morning.

About noon, when we learned that he hadn’t moved, it was suggested to the Prince that we should launch a night attack on him at his camp in Nairn. There were many arguments for and against this idea. After thinking it through, the Prince agreed to the plan, seeing it as the best opportunity he had to defeat the enemy, as long as they could catch them off guard by one o’clock in the morning.

We must here observe, that the Duke of Cumberland’s army was double the number of ours, plentifully provided with money and provisions of all kinds; having a squadron of ships, loaded with stores, that coasted along, from Aberdeen to Inverness, in sight of his army, to supply him with whatever was necessary. Whereas our military chest was spent; the men had not received pay for some time, had got no provisions this day but a single bisket each, and were much fatigued by severe duty.

We need to note that the Duke of Cumberland’s army was twice our size, well-funded, and had all sorts of supplies. They had a fleet of ships loaded with provisions that followed them along the coast from Aberdeen to Inverness, ready to supply them with whatever they needed. In contrast, our military funds were depleted; the troops hadn’t been paid in a while and only received a single biscuit each that day. They were also very exhausted from the tough work.

[Pg 415]

[Pg 415]

In this situation the Prince could not propose to keep his army together. He was obliged either to fight or starve. And altho above 3000 men, under the command of the Earl of Cromarty, Macdonald of Barisdale, Macgregor of Glengyle, Cluny Macpherson, and others, who were expected every hour, had not yet joined, he resolved to risk the event of an engagement.

In this situation, the Prince couldn't suggest keeping his army intact. He had no choice but to either fight or face starvation. And even though over 3,000 men, led by the Earl of Cromarty, Macdonald of Barisdale, Macgregor of Glengyle, Cluny Macpherson, and others, were expected to join at any moment, he decided to take the chance and engage in battle.

The night attack being therefore agreed to, was to have been executed thus. One third of the army, commanded by Lord George Murray, were to have passed the water of Nairn, two miles below Culraick, and two from Nairn, to have attacked the enemy on the south east near to the sea; whilst the other two thirds, under the command of the Duke of Perth and his brother Lord John Drummond, were to have attacked them on the plain, from the north east and all the way to the sea, so as to have joined those who were to have attacked on the other side.

The night attack was agreed upon and was planned as follows. One third of the army, led by Lord George Murray, was supposed to cross the Nairn River, two miles below Culraick and two miles from Nairn, to attack the enemy to the southeast near the sea. Meanwhile, the other two thirds, under the Duke of Perth and his brother Lord John Drummond, were to attack from the northeast across the plain and all the way to the sea, so they could join forces with those attacking from the other side.

That our design might not be discovered by the enemy, the march began about eight o’clock at night. Lord George Murray led the van. He had along with him, besides several gentlemen volunteers and officers, 30 men of the Mackintoshes, who lived in that very country, as guides. They conducted him the moor road, that he might not fall in with the enemy’s patrolls; and small parties were stationed at proper distances to prevent the enemy from receiving any intelligence.

To keep our plan hidden from the enemy, we started our march around eight o'clock in the evening. Lord George Murray was at the front. He was accompanied by several volunteer gentlemen and officers, along with 30 men from the Mackintosh clan, who lived in the area and acted as guides. They took him along the moor road so he wouldn't run into enemy patrols, and small groups were placed at strategic points to ensure the enemy wouldn’t get any information.

As the highlanders had often marched more than two miles in an hour, it was hoped that they could have reached Nairn before two o’clock. But before Lord George had marched a mile, he received a message that the half of the line was at a considerable distance, and orders to halt, or march slower, till the line should join. He received many messages by aides-de-camps and other officers, sent for the same purpose, by the time he had reached six miles. Altho he did not halt, he marched always slower, hoping that would do: For he knew that a halt in the van occasions a greater one in the rear, when the march begins again; whereas by marching slow, the rear might have joined without that inconveniency.

As the highlanders usually marched more than two miles in an hour, it was expected they could reach Nairn before two o’clock. However, before Lord George had covered a mile, he got word that half of the line was quite far behind, along with orders to either stop or slow down until the line caught up. By the time he had reached six miles, he received several messages from aides-de-camp and other officers relaying the same instructions. Although he didn’t stop, he continued to march slower, hoping that would be enough. He understood that halting in the front caused a longer delay in the back when the march resumed; conversely, by moving slowly, the rear could catch up without that issue.

[Pg 416]

[Pg 416]

It was already near two o’clock in the morning, and the van near four miles from the enemy. Most of the officers of distinction were now come up to the front; particularly the Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Lochiel and his brother, and M. oSulivan. The Duke of Perth told Lord George Murray that unless he made a halt the center and rear columns could not join. We halted. Here the officers began to examine their present situation. They were of opinion, that by the time the line had joined, and the army advanced two miles farther, it would be day light, and consequently the enemy would have time to point their canon, draw up their men, and place their horse so as to act in the most advantagious manner. Besides, a great number of our men had left their ranks and lain down in the wood of Culraick, which must have proceeded from faintness for want of food, and not from the fatigue of a six miles march. In these circumstances the attack was judged impracticable. To get back to Culloden, so as the men could have some hours refreshment, in case they should be obliged to fight that day, was what they agreed to.

It was already close to two in the morning, and the van was about four miles from the enemy. Most of the prominent officers had gathered at the front, especially the Duke of Perth, Lord John Drummond, Lochiel and his brother, and M. oSulivan. The Duke of Perth informed Lord George Murray that unless he called for a stop, the center and rear columns wouldn't be able to join. We paused. Here, the officers began to assess their current situation. They believed that by the time the lines came together and the army advanced another two miles, it would be daylight, giving the enemy enough time to set up their cannons, organize their troops, and position their cavalry to take the best approach. Additionally, many of our men had left their ranks and lay down in the woods of Culraick, likely due to exhaustion from lack of food, not simply from the fatigue of the six-mile march. Given these circumstances, launching an attack was considered unfeasible. They agreed to return to Culloden so the men could get a few hours of rest in case they needed to fight that day.

As the Prince was about a mile behind in the rear, and the road through the wood very difficult to pass, they thought it would consume too much time to send back for orders, Lord George Murray therefore ordered the retreat. The Duke of Perth went back to acquaint the Prince with this resolution. At first he seemed much surprised, on which the Duke offered to march back the men; but after some reflection, he saw it was then too late.

As the Prince was about a mile behind and the road through the woods was really tough to navigate, they figured it would take too long to send back for orders, so Lord George Murray decided to retreat. The Duke of Perth went back to inform the Prince of this decision. At first, he seemed quite surprised, so the Duke offered to march the men back, but after thinking it over, he realized it was too late for that.

We marched back the shortest way, as we had not the same reason for shuning houses in returning as we had in advancing.

We walked back the quickest route since we didn't have the same reason to avoid houses on the way back as we did on the way there.

The van had only got to the Church of Cray, that is two miles from where the halt was made, when it was broad day light. This showed that the enemy could not have been surprised as was intended. However, had the center and rear marched as quick as the van, it might certainly have been done.

The van had only reached the Church of Cray, which is two miles from where they stopped, when it was broad daylight. This indicated that the enemy couldn't have been surprised as planned. However, if the center and rear had marched as quickly as the van, it definitely could have happened.

[Pg 417]

[Pg 417]

Between 5 and 6 o’clock, all the army reached Culloden: But many, as well officers as soldiers went to Inverness and places adjacent, in quest of provisions, which were difficult to find.

Between 5 and 6 o’clock, the entire army arrived at Culloden. However, many, including both officers and soldiers, went to Inverness and nearby areas in search of supplies, which were hard to come by.

The Prince had scarcely reposed himself an hour, when accounts were brought, that the enemy was in full march to attack him. He immediately sent aid-de-camps to bring up the men, who were at Inverness. In the mean time he marched up the troops that were about Culloden to Drummossie muir; but half a mile nearer than where they were formed the preceeding day.

The Prince had barely rested for an hour when he received news that the enemy was advancing to attack him. He quickly sent aides-de-camp to bring up the troops stationed at Inverness. In the meantime, he moved the soldiers near Culloden to Drummossie Muir, but positioned them half a mile closer than where they had been assembled the previous day.

This was our order of battle. The right wing, commanded by Lord George Murray, consisted of his own regiment of Athol, Camerons of Lochiel, Stuarts of Appin, one battallion of the Frazers of Lovat, and the Mackintoshes. The left wing, commanded by the Duke of Perth, consisted of the Macdonalds of Glengary, Keppoch and Clanranald, two companies of Macleans, two companies of Macleods, and the Farquharsons. The 2d line, commanded by Lord John Drummond and Major General Stappleton, consisted of the Irish piquets, the regiments of Lord Ogilvy, Lord Lewis Gordon, Duke of Perth, and Lord John Drummond. On the right wing, behind the 2d line, was a troop of Fitz-james’s horse; and on the left the horse guards, Perth-shire squadron and Hussards. The regiments of the Earl of Kilmarnock’s foot guards, and Colonel John Roy Stuart, with such of our men as had no guns formed a sort of reserve.

This was our battle lineup. The right wing, led by Lord George Murray, included his own Athol regiment, the Camerons of Lochiel, the Stuarts of Appin, one battalion of the Frazers of Lovat, and the Mackintoshes. The left wing, led by the Duke of Perth, included the Macdonalds of Glengarry, Keppoch and Clanranald, two companies of Macleans, two companies of Macleods, and the Farquharsons. The second line, led by Lord John Drummond and Major General Stapleton, consisted of the Irish pickets and the regiments of Lord Ogilvy, Lord Lewis Gordon, the Duke of Perth, and Lord John Drummond. On the right wing, behind the second line, was a troop of Fitz-James’s cavalry; and on the left were the horse guards, the Perthshire squadron, and the Hussars. The regiments of the Earl of Kilmarnock’s foot guards and Colonel John Roy Stuart, along with those of our men who had no guns, formed a sort of reserve.

The whole did not exceed 6000 foot and 150 horse. We had six pieces of canon, two placed on the right, two on the left, and two in the center of the front line. Our front was to the east.

The total did not go over 6000 infantry and 150 cavalry. We had six cannons, two positioned on the right, two on the left, and two in the center of the front line. Our front faced east.

The Duke of Cumberland drew up his army in three lines. The first, commanded by Lieutenant-General the Earl of Albemarle, consisted of the regiments of Barrel, Monro, Scot’s Fusileers, Price, Cholmondley and Sinclair. The 2d, commanded by Major General Huske, consisted of the regiments of Wolfe, Ligonier, Sempil, Bligh, and Flemming. The [Pg 418]3d line, commanded by Brigadier Mordant, consisted of the regiments of Blackeney, Battereau, Pulteney and Howard. On the right wing were placed Cobham’s dragoons, and the half of Kingston’s horse, with the Campbells of Argyle.

The Duke of Cumberland positioned his army in three lines. The first line, led by Lieutenant-General the Earl of Albemarle, included the regiments of Barrel, Monro, Scot’s Fusileers, Price, Cholmondley, and Sinclair. The second line, under Major General Huske, was made up of the regiments of Wolfe, Ligonier, Sempil, Bligh, and Flemming. The third line, commanded by Brigadier Mordant, consisted of the regiments of Blackeney, Battereau, Pulteney, and Howard. The right wing featured Cobham’s dragoons, half of Kingston’s cavalry, and the Campbells of Argyle.

Had these regiments been all compleat, they should have amounted to 15000 men, but as they were they surely amounted to near 12000 foot and 1200 horse. Ten pieces of canon were placed in the first line, two between each regiment; and six pieces in the 2d line.

Had these regiments been fully formed, they would have totaled 15,000 men, but as they were, they definitely numbered close to 12,000 foot soldiers and 1,200 cavalry. Ten cannons were positioned in the front line, with two between each regiment, and six cannons in the second line.

The enemy formed at a considerable distance, and marched in order of battle. About two o’clock afternoon the canonading began.

The enemy gathered at a significant distance and marched in battle formation. Around two in the afternoon, the cannon fire started.

The Prince, after riding along the lines to animate the men, placed himself about the center, that he might the more conveniently give his orders. The enemy’s canon galled us much. One of the Prince’s servants, who led a sumpter horse, was killed at his side.

The Prince, after riding along the lines to motivate the soldiers, positioned himself near the center so he could more easily give his orders. The enemy’s cannon was causing us a lot of trouble. One of the Prince’s servants, who was leading a pack horse, was killed beside him.

We were greatly out-lined both on right and left. Some alterations were made in our disposition in order to remedy this. Our right was covered by some old park walls, that led towards the water of Nairn. The Campbells got behind these walls, pulled them down, and placed a battery of canon, which did great execution on our right.

We were heavily outflanked on both the right and left sides. To fix this, we made some changes to our setup. Our right side was protected by some old park walls that ran toward the Nairn River. The Campbells managed to get behind these walls, tore them down, and set up a battery of cannons, which caused a lot of damage on our right.

The Prince ordered to begin the attack. Our men attacked with all the fury imaginable, and made several impressions on the enemys line; particularly the Athol-men broke entirely the regiments of Barret and Monro, and took possession of two pieces of canon. But the enemy keeping a close hedge fire, overpowering us with numbers, and attacking us on both flanks, threw our lines into great confusion, and at last obliged us to quit the field. The Duke of Cumberland was likewise assisted by a great storm of hail and rain that blew in our faces.

The Prince ordered the attack to start. Our troops charged with all the fury imaginable and made several impacts on the enemy's line; especially the Athol men completely shattered the regiments of Barret and Monro, and captured two pieces of cannon. However, the enemy maintained a heavy fire from behind cover, overwhelming us with their numbers and hitting us on both flanks, which caused great confusion in our lines and ultimately forced us to leave the field. The Duke of Cumberland was also aided by a fierce storm of hail and rain blowing in our faces.

The Prince did all he could to rally his men, but to no purpose. He was therefore obliged to retire. He crossed the water of Nairn at the ford on the high way between Inverness and Corryburgh, and then went to Lord Lovats. The greatest part of the army went to Ruthven in Badennoch.

The Prince did everything he could to motivate his men, but it was pointless. He had no choice but to withdraw. He crossed the Nairn River at the ford along the highway between Inverness and Corryburgh, and then went to see Lord Lovat. Most of the army headed to Ruthven in Badenoch.

[Pg 419]

[Pg 419]

As we had not afterwards an opportunity of reviewing our men, we cannot exactly say what loss we sustained in the action. By the enemy’s account we lost 2000 men, and they 300. But there is reason to think, that on the one side they magnify, and on the other diminish the numbers.

As we didn't get a chance to check on our troops afterwards, we can't say for sure what our losses were in the battle. According to the enemy, we lost 2,000 men, and they lost 300. However, it seems likely that they are exaggerating their own losses while downplaying ours.

‘Cum rectè factorum sibi quisque gratiam trahat, unius invidiâ ab omnibus peccatur.’ Tac. Ann. 1. 3 c. 53.

‘When everyone blames one person out of jealousy, they fail to recognize the good that each person has done.’ Tac. Ann. 1. 3 c. 53.


[Pg 421]

[Pg 421]

APPENDIX I
The Jacobite Lord Sempill

Mr. Fitzroy Bell, in a note to Murray’s Memorials (p. 42), relates that he had been unable to discover who this Jacobite Lord Sempill was. The researches of the Marquis de Ruvigny among the Stuart Papers, published in the Jacobite Peerage, make his identity quite clear. Francis Sempill was the son and heir of Robert Sempill, an officer in the French army. In 1712 this Robert Sempill received from the court of St. Germains a ‘Declaration of Noblesse,’ which stated that he ‘is grandson of the late Hugh, Lord Sempill, Peer of Scotland and sole heir-male of the property and the ancient title of the said lord, whose fourth son, Archibald, father of the said Robert, is the only one who left any living male child.’ On the 16th of July 1723 he appears as Mr. Robert Sempill, Captain of the Regiment of Dillon. He died at Paris intestate. In the documents of probate he is termed ‘Robert, Lord Sempill, alias Robert Sempill.’ On the strength of the title given to him in this reference, the Marquis de Ruvigny states that after 1723, when he was termed simply ‘Mr. Robert Sempill,’ he ‘seems after that date to have been created by James III. and VIII. a lord and peer of Parliament.’ This assumption has also been made by Mr. Fitzroy Bell, Mr. Andrew Lang, and other recent writers, but there is no evidence of any new creation, nor indeed was there any necessity for it. Robert Sempill the soldier had received in 1712 the declaration that he was entitled to the ancient title, but apparently had not used it. It seems natural to believe that his son Francis, who on the death of the father would prepare the probate papers, inserted in them the title of lord, to which the Declaration of 1712 said his father was entitled, and that on succeeding he assumed the title which his father had not used.

Mr. Fitzroy Bell, in a note to Murray’s Memorials (p. 42), mentions that he couldn't find out who the Jacobite Lord Sempill was. The research of the Marquis de Ruvigny in the Stuart Papers, published in the Jacobite Peerage, makes his identity clear. Francis Sempill was the son and heir of Robert Sempill, an officer in the French army. In 1712, Robert Sempill received a ‘Declaration of Noblesse’ from the court of St. Germains, which stated that he ‘is the grandson of the late Hugh, Lord Sempill, Peer of Scotland, and the sole male heir to the property and ancient title of said lord, whose fourth son, Archibald, the father of Robert, is the only one who left any living male child.’ On July 16, 1723, he is referred to as Mr. Robert Sempill, Captain of the Dillon Regiment. He died in Paris without a will. In the probate documents, he is referred to as ‘Robert, Lord Sempill, alias Robert Sempill.’ Based on the title given to him in this reference, the Marquis de Ruvigny states that after 1723, when he was referred to simply as ‘Mr. Robert Sempill,’ he ‘seems after that date to have been created by James III. and VIII. a lord and peer of Parliament.’ This assumption has also been made by Mr. Fitzroy Bell, Mr. Andrew Lang, and other recent writers, but there’s no evidence of any new creation, nor was there any need for one. Robert Sempill the soldier had received the declaration in 1712 stating he was entitled to the ancient title, but he apparently did not use it. It seems reasonable to think that his son Francis, who would prepare the probate papers upon his father’s death, included the title of lord, which the 1712 Declaration stated his father was entitled to, and that upon succeeding, he took on the title that his father had not used.

The following table shows the relationship of the Jacobite Lord Sempill with the nobleman who bore the same title in Scotland. He fought at Culloden and died the same year at Aberdeen (see p. 164).

The following table shows the connection between the Jacobite Lord Sempill and the nobleman who held the same title in Scotland. He fought at Culloden and died that same year in Aberdeen (see p. 164).

[Pg 422]

[Pg 422]

Geneology of Lord Sempill

APPENDIX II
Murray of Broughton and the Edinburgh Bishopric

At the Revolution there were eight hundred and seven parishes in Scotland filled by ministers of the Episcopal Church. On the accession of William and Mary and the Abolition of Episcopacy and the Establishment of the Presbyterian Church, all the bishops refused the Oath to the new Sovereigns, and a large number of the clergy left their parishes for the same reason.

At the time of the Revolution, there were eight hundred and seven parishes in Scotland served by ministers of the Episcopal Church. When William and Mary took the throne and Episcopacy was abolished in favor of the Presbyterian Church, all the bishops refused to take an oath to the new rulers, and many of the clergy left their parishes for the same reason.

At first there was much toleration, but as the bishops and the Episcopal clergy were all Non-jurors and maintained their allegiance to the exiled Stuart kings, they gradually became a Jacobite institution. Although very feeble, they were torn with internal dissension both doctrinal and ecclesiastical. As the pre-Revolution bishops died out, it was thought necessary in order to keep up the succession to consecrate new bishops, but this had to be done with utmost secrecy.

At first, there was a lot of tolerance, but as the bishops and the Episcopal clergy remained Non-jurors and pledged their loyalty to the exiled Stuart kings, they slowly turned into a Jacobite institution. Even though they were quite weak, they were filled with internal conflicts, both in beliefs and church practices. As the bishops from before the Revolution passed away, it was deemed necessary to maintain the succession by consecrating new bishops, but this had to be done very discreetly.

At first these bishops were appointed bishops at large without any diocese or territorial jurisdiction, and were known as the College of Bishops, but gradually the clergy demanded some sort of superintendence. Bishops were consecrated by one party and by others, but all on the understanding that they owed allegiance to the Stuart king. To avoid scandal the Jacobite managers and the Jacobite Court insisted that when bishops were elected the king should be informed so as to give congé d’élire before consecration. This power was afterwards compromised by the exiled king permitting the clergy to select all the bishops except the metropolitans of St. Andrews and[Pg 423] Glasgow, and a Bishop of Edinburgh who might have to act as metropolitan under the title of Vicar-General of St. Andrews.

At first, these bishops were appointed as bishops without a specific diocese or territory and were known as the College of Bishops, but gradually the clergy demanded some form of oversight. Bishops were consecrated by various groups, but all with the understanding that they owed loyalty to the Stuart king. To prevent scandal, the Jacobite managers and the Jacobite Court insisted that when bishops were elected, the king should be notified to grant congé d’élire before consecration. This authority was later compromised when the exiled king allowed the clergy to choose all the bishops except for the metropolitans of St. Andrews and[Pg 423] Glasgow, and a Bishop of Edinburgh who might need to function as metropolitan under the title of Vicar-General of St. Andrews.

In the year 1741 John Murray, as Agent in Scotland for the Jacobite Court, sent up the name of William Harper, who was incumbent of St. Paul’s Non-juring Episcopal Church in Carrubber’s Close. He was well connected, being married to a daughter of Sir David Thriepland of Fingask, and he was also principal adviser to most of the prominent Jacobites of the time.

In 1741, John Murray, acting as the Agent in Scotland for the Jacobite Court, put forward the name of William Harper, who was the minister of St. Paul’s Non-juring Episcopal Church in Carrubber’s Close. He had strong connections, as he was married to a daughter of Sir David Thriepland of Fingask, and he also served as the main adviser to many of the leading Jacobites of that era.

Some of the bishops did not want him, and Bishop Keith represented to the Chevalier through Murray that Harper was an objectionable person, and implored the king to withdraw his congé d’élire. Mr. Harper retired from the contest.

Some of the bishops didn’t want him, and Bishop Keith told the Chevalier through Murray that Harper was an undesirable person, urging the king to take back his congé d’élire. Mr. Harper stepped back from the race.

After much negotiation John Murray, apparently with the concurrence of the majority of the bishops, fixed upon Bishop Rattray as a man likely from his age and rank to put an end to the dissensions; and James sent from Rome a congé de lire to elect him Bishop of Edinburgh, apparently with certain metropolitan powers. Rattray, however, died a few days after this permission was received, and the see was not filled until 1776.

After a lot of negotiation, John Murray, seemingly with the agreement of most of the bishops, chose Bishop Rattray as the person likely, due to his age and position, to resolve the disputes. James then sent a congé de lire from Rome to elect him as Bishop of Edinburgh, apparently granting him some metropolitan powers. However, Rattray passed away just a few days after this permission was received, and the position remained vacant until 1776.

Bishop Rattray was a Perthshire laird, the head of the ancient family of Rattray of Craighall. His son John acted as surgeon to Prince Charles throughout the campaign of 1745-46. A volume recently published, A Jacobite Stronghold of the Church, by Mary E. Ingram (Edinburgh, 1907), gives much information about William Harper and the Episcopal Church in Jacobite times.

Bishop Rattray was a landowner from Perthshire, leading the historic Rattray family of Craighall. His son John served as a surgeon to Prince Charles during the 1745-46 campaign. A book recently published, A Jacobite Stronghold of the Church, by Mary E. Ingram (Edinburgh, 1907), provides a lot of information about William Harper and the Episcopal Church during the Jacobite era.


APPENDIX III
SIR JAMES STEUART

Sir James Steuart (afterwards Steuart Denham) of Goodtrees and Coltness, second baronet. His father had been Solicitor-General, and his grandfather Lord Advocate, and both belonged to the party of the Covenanters. Sir James was born in 1712, and in 1743 he married Lady Frances, daughter of the fourth Earl of Wemyss, and sister of Lord Elcho, one of the Jacobite leaders of the ’Forty-five. When Prince Charles came to Edinburgh, Sir James joined his Court, and he is the reputed author of some of the Prince’s manifestos. In the autumn of 1745 he was sent to France as the Prince’s agent.

Sir James Steuart (later known as Steuart Denham) of Goodtrees and Coltness, the second baronet. His father was the Solicitor-General, and his grandfather was the Lord Advocate, both of whom were part of the Covenanters. Sir James was born in 1712, and in 1743 he married Lady Frances, daughter of the fourth Earl of Wemyss, and sister of Lord Elcho, one of the Jacobite leaders of '45. When Prince Charles arrived in Edinburgh, Sir James joined his Court and is believed to be the author of some of the Prince’s manifestos. In the autumn of 1745, he was sent to France as the Prince’s agent.

[Pg 424]

[Pg 424]

In the Stuart Papers there is a document headed ‘A Copy of Sir James Stewart’s powers, Dec. 29, 1746.’

In the Stuart Papers, there's a document titled 'A Copy of Sir James Stewart’s powers, Dec. 29, 1746.'

‘Nous Charles Prince de Galles Regent des Royaumes d’Angleterre, d’Ecosse, etc. jugeant qu’il est notre service dans la conjouncture presente de charger de nos affaires auprès de Sa Majesté très-chretienne une personne instruite de nos intentions nous avons choisi le Chevalier Baronet Stuart auquel nous avons donné et donnons pouvoir, commission, et mandement special de traitter et negotier avec les ministres de Sa Majesté [très-chrètienne] arrester, conclure et signer avec eux tous les articles ou conventions qu’il avisera bon être.... Fait a Paris ce 29 Decembre 1746.’

‘We, Charles Prince of Wales, Regent of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, etc., deciding that it is in our best interest at this time to entrust our affairs with His Most Christian Majesty to someone knowledgeable of our intentions, have chosen Sir Baronet Stuart, to whom we have granted and are granting special authority, commission, and mandate to negotiate and deal with the ministers of His Most Christian Majesty, to settle, conclude, and sign all articles or agreements that he deems appropriate... Done in Paris this 29th day of December 1746.’

This seems to be a copy of the credential which he received in Edinburgh, and which, probably for precautionary reasons, he did not carry with him in case of being captured and searched. The whole commission is printed among the Stuart Papers in Browne’s History of the Highlands, vol. iii. p. 472.

This appears to be a copy of the credential he received in Edinburgh, and likely for safety reasons, he didn’t take it with him in case he got captured and searched. The entire commission is printed in the Stuart Papers in Browne’s History of the Highlands, vol. iii. p. 472.

Sir James was specially excepted from the Act of Indemnity of 1747. He wandered on the Continent until 1763, when he was permitted to return to Scotland. He received a pardon in 1771, and died in 1780. He was author of Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy (1767), and other works. There is information about his Jacobite career in the narratives of his brother-in-law, Lord Elcho, recently published, also a long biography in The Coltness Collections, in which every effort is made to ignore or minimise his Jacobitism.

Sir James was specifically excluded from the Act of Indemnity of 1747. He traveled around Europe until 1763, when he was allowed to return to Scotland. He received a pardon in 1771 and passed away in 1780. He authored Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy (1767) and other works. Information about his Jacobite career can be found in the recently published narratives of his brother-in-law, Lord Elcho, as well as in a lengthy biography in The Coltness Collections, which tries hard to downplay or ignore his Jacobite ties.

There was something mysterious both about his joining the Jacobite Court and about his departure from Scotland. Robert Chambers, in his History of the Rebellion, chap. xxiv., relates, upon the authority of Sir Henry Steuart of Allanton, Sir James’s near relative, the story of his joining the Prince at Holyrood, which may be told in Chambers’s own words.

There was something mysterious about both his joining the Jacobite Court and his leaving Scotland. Robert Chambers, in his History of the Rebellion, chap. xxiv., shares, based on the account of Sir Henry Steuart of Allanton, who was a close relative of Sir James, the story of his joining the Prince at Holyrood, which can be told in Chambers’s own words.

‘Descended of a whig family, Sir James had, nevertheless, allowed himself, in the course of his travels, to form an intimacy with the Stuart princes and some of their principal adherents. He had more lately been piqued at the treatment he had received at an election from one of the officers of the government. He was disposed to join the enterprise of the Prince, but wished that, in doing so, he should not appear quite a free agent. His sister’s husband, the Earl of Buchan, a good man, of moderate understanding, was brought by him to the same views, and they agreed with Lady Steuart’s brother, Lord Elcho, that they should be seized in a public place, and carried to Holyrood House, as if against their will. Walking next day at the cross of Edinburgh, Sir James and the earl were seized accordingly, and conducted to the palace. There a message was sent from an anteroom to the Chevalier, mentioning their[Pg 425] presence. The Prince, who in the meanwhile had heard of the manner of their visit, returned for answer, that if the Earl of Buchan and Sir James Steuart came as willing partisans to befriend his cause, he should be proud and happy to see them, but not otherwise. This bluntness, though honourable to the Prince’s candour, displeased Buchan, whose resolution, perhaps, had already begun to give way. He therefore made a low bow to the officer, and said: “Please inform his royal highness that I have the honour to be his most obedient humble servant”; after which he instantly left the palace. Sir James, too much offended with the government to retrace his steps, remained to see the Prince upon the terms prescribed.’

Descended from a Whig family, Sir James had, however, allowed himself, during his travels, to cultivate a friendship with the Stuart princes and some of their key supporters. Recently, he had been annoyed by how he was treated at an election by one of the government officials. He was inclined to join the Prince's cause but wanted to make it seem like he wasn’t completely free to choose. His sister's husband, the Earl of Buchan, a decent man with average intelligence, was persuaded by him to share the same views, and they agreed with Lady Steuart’s brother, Lord Elcho, that they should be taken from a public place to Holyrood House as if it was against their will. The next day, while walking at the cross of Edinburgh, Sir James and the Earl were accordingly seized and brought to the palace. There, a message was sent from an anteroom to the Chevalier, mentioning their presence. The Prince, who had by then learned how they arrived, replied that if the Earl of Buchan and Sir James Steuart came as willing supporters of his cause, he would be proud and happy to see them, but not otherwise. This bluntness, though commendable for the Prince's honesty, upset Buchan, whose resolve might have already started to waver. He thus bowed to the officer and said, “Please let his royal highness know that I have the honor to be his most obedient humble servant”; after which he promptly left the palace. Sir James, too irritated with the government to backtrack, stayed to see the Prince on the terms given.

There was something still more mysterious about his departure. The following depositions were found in the Records of the Sheriff Court of Kincardineshire by Dr. W. A. Macnaughton of Stonehaven,[639] who kindly sent them to me. The depositions were taken from witnesses in a civil action of false imprisonment by James Grant against Alexander Garioch of Mergie. Garioch acted as deputy governor of Stonehaven for Prince Charles. Apparently the authorities took the opportunity of interrogating the Jacobite witnesses about Sir James. The portions of the depositions that refer to Sir James Steuart only are here given.

There was something even more mysterious about his departure. The following statements were found in the records of the Sheriff Court of Kincardineshire by Dr. W. A. Macnaughton of Stonehaven, who kindly sent them to me. The statements were taken from witnesses in a civil case of false imprisonment filed by James Grant against Alexander Garioch of Mergie. Garioch served as the deputy governor of Stonehaven for Prince Charles. Apparently, the authorities seized the chance to question the Jacobite witnesses about Sir James. The parts of the statements that specifically mention Sir James Steuart are provided here.

1. Peter Barclay of Johnstoun[640] ... Being Interrogate concerning Sir James Stewart Depones that some time about the middle of November or a little before it, the Deponent had occasion to be at Stonhyve in a Tavern with Mr. Garioch, that he saw a person who passed under the Name of Brown, and who was called by Mergie to the Deponent a Prisoner, but that there was no guard sett upon him and the Deponent saw him at liberty to go out and in under no confinement that the Deponent could observe, That the Deponent had had occasion about sixteen years before to be in company with Sir James Stewart That when the Deponent saw this person who was called Brown he thought he had seen him before, but could not then recollect who he was That the day after the Deponent had seen this person he was conversing with one Menzies in the French service was enquiring who this person might be and was positive he had seen him before, That Menzies said he did not know who he was, but that some days before Lord Lewis Gordon had been dining with him, and he observed that Lord Lewis was Drinking to this person his health That upon this the Deponent recollected and said he imagined him to be Sir James Stuart, Depones that when that person was ordered to be taken on board of a ffrench ship by Mergie’s command he took a formal protest in waiting against Mergie for forcing him out[Pg 426] of the Kingdom against his will, Being interrogate if he thought it was a serious protest Depones that he did not know what to think of it but was very much surprised at the whole proceeding and that when the Deponent said to Mergie that he judged this person to be Sir James Stuart, Mergie absolutely refused that it was, that this person went down to the Boat in order to embark aboard of the ship which lay at anchor without any guard attending him, Mergie and the Deponent and several others went along with him to the Boat.

1. Peter Barclay of Johnstoun[640] ... Being questioned about Sir James Stewart, he states that sometime around the middle of November or just before it, he was at a tavern in Stonhyve with Mr. Garioch. There, he saw a person who went by the name of Brown, who was referred to by Mergie as a prisoner. However, there was no guard on him, and he observed that the person was free to come and go without any visible restrictions. Peter recalls that about sixteen years earlier, he had been in the company of Sir James Stewart. When he saw the person called Brown, he felt he recognized him but couldn’t place who he was. The following day, while talking to someone named Menzies from the French service, he asked about the identity of this person and was sure he had seen him before. Menzies admitted he didn’t know who he was but mentioned that a few days earlier, Lord Lewis Gordon had dined with him and had toasted to this individual’s health. This prompted Peter to recall and suggest he believed this person was Sir James Stuart. He also recounts that when this person was ordered by Mergie to be taken aboard a French ship, he formally protested against Mergie for forcing him out of the kingdom against his will. When asked if he thought it was a serious protest, Peter replied that he wasn’t sure what to make of it but was very surprised by the whole situation. When he told Mergie he believed the person was Sir James Stuart, Mergie vehemently denied it. The individual then went down to the boat to board the ship, which was anchored nearby, without any guard accompanying him. Mergie, Peter, and several others went along with him to the boat.

4. John Maule[641] Depones that some time in October 1745 a ffrench ship arrived in the Harbour of Stonhyve with some chests of Arms, six pieces of cannon, and other warlike stores, That Mergie received from the Hands of one Black, who called himself Supercargo of the said Ship all these Warlike Instruments, and called in the country to assist in carrying them southwards, Depones that the above mentioned Black went south along with the cargo of Arms etc. which were brought from on board the above mentioned vessel, and returned again in about 2 weeks after he arrived at the Publick House keeped by John Falconer and that there was in his company as the Deponent had occasion to see immediately after his arrival a Gentleman unknown to the Deponent, that when the Deponent enquired at Black who this Person was Black told him he had met with him at Montrose, and believed him to be one of the officers who had been taken Prisoner at the Battle of Prestonpans and had made his Escape That Black desired the Deponent to go to Mergie and inform him that there was such a Gentleman at Mr. Falconer’s house whom he suspected to be an officer of General Cope’s Army who had made his escape, That the deponent delivered this message to Mergie, upon which Mergie came directly up to the Mill of Stonhyve That the Deponent accompanied Mergie with a Guard, That Mergie and Black took the said Person unknown to the Deponent into an Apartment by themselves, and after staying about an Hour returned again and showed to the Deponent a Black Cockade and about sixty or seventy Pistoll shot, which he said he had found upon searching about this unknown Person, and ordered him to be keeped Prisoner, and accordingly a Guard was placed upon the House all that night That next day the Deponent was sent for by Mergie and received orders from him to Remove the Guard which was upon the said unknown person, and to take the Custody and care of him himself, and desired him to keep sight of him and not suffer him to make his Escape, That for two or three days the Deponent keept a pritty watchful eye over the said unknown Gentleman during the daytime and at night there was always a Guard of three or four men placed on the House But after that during his stay in Stonhyve the Deponent sometimes attended the said Gentleman when he walked for his Recreation any distance from the Town but he was left for most part without any guard or attendance That during the time of the said person’s stay at Stonhyve Mergie was frequently in company with him at Dinner and Supper and frequently they were alone[Pg 427] together Depones that one day when the deponent was in the laigh Room of the Mill of Stonhyve he heard this unknown Gentleman and the first and second Master of the abovementioned French ship in company in the Room immediately above, That the Deponent heard them laughing and very merry together, that they were speaking ffrench and so loud that if the deponent had understood it, he might have heard what they said very well, That after the abovementioned Company above stairs had parted, the Deponent met with the second master of the French vessel and asked him how it came about that he was so very familiar and so free in the Company of that gentleman who was a Prisoner, Oh! said the master in English which he spoke very well, you are quite mistaken, this is one of our own friends, Depones that to the best of the Deponent’s remembrance this Person staid in town about eight or ten days, that when the Ship was ready to sail Mergie signed a formal Warrand for Transporting him in the said ship to France, and a Guard was placed in order to convey him to the Boat, That the said Person took a formal protest agt. Mergie for sending him out of the Kingdom against his Will, and being Interrogate if he understood the said Protest to be serious Depones that he did not know what to think of it and was very much surprised when he considered of all the proceedings in relation to this person from first to last, how he was upon his first arrival under a strick Guard afterwards very much at Liberty and last of all formally sent aboard of the ship to be transported seemingly against his will, That when this Person was going into the Boat and taking his leave of other people upon the shoar he came up to the deponent and embracing him very kindly, told him that he was very sensible of his civilities, and would represent his good Behaviour to people that he did not then think of, Depones that he remembers when this person was in Stonhyve, there was an attempt made by the Ludlow Castle, a Ship belonging to the King’s Navy, to force the harbour by her boat with about fifty men or thereby, That upon this Occasion the unknown person above mentioned was very active in assisting and directing the French crew about the manner of Planting their Battery and Defending the Harbour in which he seemed to have skill, Depones that Mergie at first when this person was committed to the Deponent’s custody charged him to be very strict in his Watch over him, but shortly after desired him to be easy with him and let him go about his business as he pleased Depones that he would know this person if he saw him again But that he knew nothing who he was during the Time of his stay at Stonhyve, that shortly after he heard from people that came from the south that it was Sir James Stewart That a few days after the said person came to Stonhyve Sir Alexander Bannerman came and waited upon him at the Mill of Stonhyve immediately after the Deponent received Orders from Mergie not to be strict in his guard over the said person Depones that when he saw the said Person so very active in giving directions about planting the Cannon against the King’s Boat which attempted the Harbour he did then and not till then suspect that his being a Prisoner was a Farce.

4. John Maule[641] states that sometime in October 1745, a French ship arrived in the harbor of Stonhyve with some chests of arms, six pieces of cannon, and other military supplies. Mergie received these weapons from a man named Black, who called himself the supercargo of that ship, and went into the countryside to ask for help in transporting them south. Maule notes that Black went south with the cargo of arms brought from the ship, and returned about two weeks later to the public house run by John Falconer. Upon his arrival, Maule noticed that Black was accompanied by a gentleman whom he didn't recognize. When Maule asked Black who this man was, Black said he had met him in Montrose and believed him to be one of the officers who had been captured at the Battle of Prestonpans and had managed to escape. Black asked Maule to go to Mergie and inform him that there was such a gentleman at Mr. Falconer’s house, whom he suspected to be an officer in General Cope’s army who had escaped. Maule delivered this message to Mergie, who then went directly to the Mill of Stonhyve. Maule accompanied Mergie with a guard, and Mergie and Black brought the unknown gentleman into a private room. After about an hour, they returned and showed Maule a black cockade and around sixty or seventy pistol shots, which they said they found while searching the unknown gentleman, and ordered him to be kept as a prisoner. A guard was placed at the house that night. The next day, Mergie called for Maule and instructed him to remove the guard on the unknown gentleman and to take responsibility for him himself, requesting that he keep an eye on him and prevent his escape. For two or three days, Maule kept a close watch over the gentleman during the day, and at night, a guard of three or four men was stationed at the house. But after that, during his time in Stonhyve, Maule sometimes accompanied the gentleman when he walked for recreation outside of town, but he was mostly left without any guard or supervision. During the gentleman's stay at Stonhyve, Mergie frequently joined him for dinner and supper, and often they were alone together. Maule states that one day, while he was in the lower room of the Mill of Stonhyve, he heard the unknown gentleman and the first and second masters of the mentioned French ship laughing and having a good time in the room above. They were speaking French, and they were so loud that if Maule had understood French, he could have heard them clearly. After the group upstairs parted, Maule met the second master of the French ship and asked him why he was so familiar with the gentleman who was a prisoner. The master replied in English, which he spoke very well, “Oh! You are quite mistaken; this is one of our own friends.” Maule recalls that to the best of his memory, the gentleman stayed in town for about eight or ten days. When the ship was ready to sail, Mergie signed a formal order for transporting him on the ship to France, and a guard was assigned to escort him to the boat. The gentleman formally protested against Mergie for sending him out of the kingdom against his will. When asked if he thought the protest was serious, Maule said he didn’t know what to think and was very surprised by all the events surrounding this person from start to finish. The gentleman was initially under strict guard, then was given much freedom, and finally was sent on board the ship against his apparent will. When the gentleman was getting into the boat and saying goodbye to others on the shore, he approached Maule, embraced him kindly, and said he was very grateful for his kindness and would mention his good behavior to people he didn’t currently think of. Maule remembers that while the gentleman was in Stonhyve, there was an attempt by the Ludlow Castle, a ship belonging to the King’s navy, to force the harbor with about fifty men. During this event, the unknown gentleman was very active in assisting and advising the French crew on how to set up their artillery and defend the harbor, indicating he had experience in this area. Maule notes that at first, when the gentleman was committed to his custody, Mergie instructed him to keep a strict watch over him, but soon after, he told him to be relaxed about it and let the gentleman go about his business as he wished. Maule believes he would recognize the gentleman if he saw him again, but he had no idea who he was during his stay in Stonhyve. Shortly after, he heard from people who came from the south that it was Sir James Stewart. A few days after the gentleman arrived in Stonhyve, Sir Alexander Bannerman visited him at the Mill of Stonhyve right after Maule received orders from Mergie to ease up on the guard over the gentleman. Maule reflects that when he saw the gentleman being so active in giving directions about positioning the cannons against the King's boat attempting to enter the harbor, he finally suspected that his confinement was merely a pretense.

[Pg 428]

[Pg 428]

6. William Herdman ... Being Interrogate concerning Sir James Stewart Depones that he had occasion to see and be in company sometimes with a Gentleman who was said to be a Prisoner, That for several days after his arrival he was strictly guarded, but after that was left at large to go where he pleased, That one Black who came over as Supercargo on board a French vessel and had gone to the south about three weeks before Returned again in company with this unknown gentleman, That he said he had met with this Gentleman upon the Road but did not know who he was, That the Deponent sincerely believed this gentleman by his behaviour and conversation to be a person well affected to the Government, till the Ludlow Castle, one of His Majesty’s Ships, appeared and attempted to make the Harbour with her long Boat and some men on board, upon which occasion the Deponent observed that this gentleman seemed to be in some hurry and concern and as the Deponent was passing near to the Harbour he saw this gentleman and Mr. Black standing together and heard the said gentleman calling out with an appearance of solicitude and Keenness to the people who were driving down Dung to the shore for Defence of the Harbour, to go faster, or saying something to that purpose which occasioned in the Deponent a strong suspicion that he was in reality in the interest of the Pretender’s Party But after that when he saw him carried down to the ship like a Criminal with a Guard about him, the Deponent was confounded and did not know what to think of it, That sometime thereafter the Deponent heard a Rumor in the Country that it was Sir James Stewart, after that Mergie told him that it was Sir James Stewart and Jocked at his ignorance in Imagining that he was really a Prisoner.

6. William Herdman ... Being questioned about Sir James Stewart, he stated that he had the opportunity to see and be with a gentleman who was believed to be a prisoner. For several days after his arrival, he was under strict guard, but afterward was free to go where he wanted. A man named Black, who had come over as a supercargo on a French ship and went south about three weeks prior, returned with this unknown gentleman. Black mentioned that he had met this gentleman on the road but didn't know who he was. The deponent truly believed that this gentleman, based on his behavior and conversation, was supportive of the government, until the Ludlow Castle, one of His Majesty's ships, tried to enter the harbor with its longboat and some crew on board. On that occasion, the deponent noticed that this gentleman seemed hurried and worried. As the deponent passed near the harbor, he saw this gentleman and Mr. Black together, and heard the gentleman urging the people who were hurrying down to the shore for the defense of the harbor to move faster or something to that effect, which sparked strong suspicion in the deponent that he was actually aligned with the Pretender's party. However, after seeing him being escorted to the ship like a criminal with guards around him, the deponent was confused and didn’t know what to think. Some time later, the deponent heard rumors in the country that it was Sir James Stewart, and then Mergie told him it was indeed Sir James Stewart and laughed at his ignorance for thinking he was really a prisoner.

7. John Lawson, Doctor,[642] ... Being Interrogate concerning Sir James Stewart Depones that sometime towards the end of 1745 there arrived a ffrench ship in the Harbour of Stonhyve That one Black who was said to be supercargo of the said ship came and Lodged in the Deponent’s House That shortly after his arrival he went south, and about a fortnight or three weeks thereafter the said Mr. Black returned and arrived at the Mill of Stonhyve and in his company there was an unknown Gentleman who was immediately taken as a Prisoner by Mergie, That the Deponent had occasion to see the said Gentleman about an Hour after his arrival and saw Weileyes (? valise) or a Bagg which the Deponent was told Mergie had searched, and in which nothing was remarkable but a small Duck Bagg with some Pistoll Ball in it and a Black Cockade, That the Deponent observed about three or four days after his arrival he was more at liberty only John Maule Writer in Stonhyve was said always to have him in custody, the Deponent has seen him alone without anybody looking after him, That some days after his arrival Sir Alexr. Bannerman came to Stonhyve Depones that he had a strong Impression from what he heard talked of frequently that this Person’s Confinement was only a Farce, That the Deponent heard some time after the said[Pg 429] Gentleman was put on board the French ship that he was Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees.

7. John Lawson, Doctor,[642] ... Being interrogated regarding Sir James Stewart, he states that sometime towards the end of 1745, a French ship arrived in the harbor of Stonhyve. A man named Black, who was said to be the ship's supercargo, came and stayed at the deponent’s house. Shortly after his arrival, he went south, and about two to three weeks later, Mr. Black returned to the Mill of Stonhyve, accompanied by an unknown gentleman who was immediately captured by Mergie. The deponent had the opportunity to see this gentleman about an hour after his arrival and noticed a bag that the deponent was told Mergie had searched. There was nothing noteworthy inside except for a small duck bag containing some pistol balls and a black cockade. The deponent observed that about three or four days after his arrival, the gentleman had more freedom, although John Maule, a writer in Stonhyve, always seemed to have him in custody. The deponent saw him alone without anyone watching over him. A few days later, Sir Alexander Bannerman came to Stonhyve and testified that he had a strong feeling, based on frequent conversations, that this person's confinement was merely a ruse. The deponent later heard that the gentleman was put on board the French ship and that he was Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees.

8. John Falconer[643] ... Being Interrogate concerning Sir James Stewart Depones that a person unknown to him, said to be a Prisoner of Mergie’s and passed under the name of Brown lodged in his House, that after the first three or four days he was left at Liberty to go where he pleased either upon foot or Horseback upon Parole as the Deponent heard to Mergie, and the Deponent thinks he could have easily made his escape if he had a mind the Deponent has seen him frequently privately in company with Mergie.

8. John Falconer[643] ... When questioned about Sir James Stewart, he states that an unknown person, said to be a prisoner of Mergie’s and going by the name of Brown, stayed at his house. After the first three or four days, he was free to go wherever he wanted, either on foot or horseback, on parole, as the deponent heard it referred to Mergie. The deponent believes he could have easily escaped if he had wanted to, as he often saw him privately with Mergie.


APPENDIX IV
The Guildhall Relief Fund

This fund, in the distribution of which Walter Grossett was concerned, and of which his brother’s widow and children were the largest beneficiaries, was probably the earliest example of systematic organisation for the supply of comforts to soldiers in the field, to the sick and wounded, and for provision for widows and orphans.

This fund, which Walter Grossett was involved in distributing, and where his brother’s widow and children were the biggest beneficiaries, was likely one of the first organized efforts to provide comforts to soldiers in the field, support the sick and wounded, and provide for widows and orphans.

The fund was instituted at the Guildhall, London, on November 27th, 1745, by Sir Richard Hoare, then Lord Mayor. The minute of the first meeting aptly declares the intention of the founders:—

The fund was established at the Guildhall in London on November 27, 1745, by Sir Richard Hoare, who was then the Lord Mayor. The record from the first meeting clearly states the founders' intentions:—

‘We whose names are underwritten, in Consideration of the particular Hardships and Inconveniencies which may be suffer’d by such Soldiers as now are, or shall hereafter be employ’d in his Majesty’s Service during the Winter Season, towards the Suppression of the present unnatural Rebellion, do hereby voluntarily Subscribe and pay the several Sums set by us against our respective Names to be applied towards their Relief, Support, and Encouragement, in such manner, and in such Proportion, as shall be deem’d to be most necessary and expedient by a Committee which shall hereafter be appointed for that Purpose by Us, or the Major Part who shall be present at any General Meeting, pursuant to an Advertisement in the London Gazette.’

‘We, the undersigned, in light of the specific hardships and inconveniences that soldiers currently face, or will face in the future, while serving in the King’s service during the winter months to help suppress the ongoing unnatural rebellion, hereby voluntarily pledge and contribute the amounts noted next to our names to assist in their relief, support, and encouragement. This will be done in the way and proportion deemed most necessary and appropriate by a committee that we, or the majority present at any general meeting, will establish for this purpose, as announced in the London Gazette.’

The result of the efforts of the Lord Mayor and his associates is recorded in an admirable report printed in 1747.

The outcome of the work done by the Lord Mayor and his colleagues is documented in an impressive report published in 1747.

The report gives a subscription list. There were exactly five hundred subscriptions, and the total amount subscribed was £18,910, 0s. 9d. The largest subscription was that of ‘the[Pg 430] Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice Willes, Lord Chief Baron Parker, and the Honourable Judges, whose gift was £1200; the smallest that of the parish of St. Thomas, Southwark, which gave 10s. 9d. In the List are found subscriptions from the Prince of Wales, £500; the Mayor, Commonalty, and Citizens of the City of London, £1000; Governor and Company of the Bank of England, £1000; John Rich from the Theatre Royal in Covent Garden, £602, 7s.; the Gentlemen Volunteers of the City of London, £523, 19s. The City Companies subscribe sums varying from £100 to £300, and it is interesting to find in the list the name of Isaac Watts, D.D., for a subscription of £5, 5s. The Report, which is an excellent business document, finishes with the following paragraph:—

The report includes a list of subscriptions. There were exactly five hundred subscriptions, and the total amount raised was £18,910, 0s. 9d. The largest subscription came from the Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice Willes, Lord Chief Baron Parker, and the Honorable Judges, whose contribution was £1200; the smallest was from the parish of St. Thomas, Southwark, which donated 10s. 9d. The list features subscriptions from the Prince of Wales, £500; the Mayor, Commonalty, and Citizens of the City of London, £1000; Governor and Company of the Bank of England, £1000; John Rich from the Theatre Royal in Covent Garden, £602, 7s.; and the Gentlemen Volunteers of the City of London, £523, 19s. The City Companies contributed amounts ranging from £100 to £300, and it's interesting to see the name of Isaac Watts, D.D., listed for a subscription of £5, 5s. The Report, which is an excellent business document, concludes with the following paragraph:—

‘In this Manner your Committee propose that the Conclusion of this Subscription should be agreeable to the Design of its original Institution; since every Calamity you can remove, or every Comfort you can bestow on Behalf of the private Soldier, will be giving them so much new Strength and Vigour to act in Defence of our Liberties, and Support of our Constitution; wherein both Interest and Duty, both publick Safety and publick Charity, may be jointly urged as Motives to your Benevolence. And as to what has already been expended, if Relief under Sickness, if Support under Fatigue, if Encouragement under Dangers, are to be esteemed Acts of Humanity or Beneficence, by how much stronger Ties were we called upon to return such Assistance to those who under the greatest Hazards and Difficulties were protecting us in the Enjoyment of every Thing that was dear and valuable: And your Committee flatter themselves that the Zeal which was exerted on this Occasion, by the Magistrates, Merchants, and other Inhabitants of this Metropolis, contributed no less to dispirit the Enemy, than it did to animate our own Forces, until they obtained that compleat Victory over the Rebels, which so happily preserved the Religion, Laws and Liberties of this Kingdom, the inseparable Blessings of his Majesty’s Government.’

‘In this way, your Committee suggests that the conclusion of this Subscription should align with the purpose of its original establishment; since every hardship you can alleviate or every comfort you can provide for the private soldier will give them renewed strength and energy to defend our freedoms and support our Constitution. Both self-interest and duty, as well as public safety and charity, can all serve as motivations for your generosity. Regarding what has already been spent, if providing relief during illness, support during fatigue, and encouragement during danger are considered acts of kindness or goodwill, how much stronger is the obligation for us to offer such assistance to those who, facing extreme risks and challenges, protect us in enjoying everything we hold dear and valuable. Your Committee believes that the enthusiasm shown during this initiative by the magistrates, merchants, and other residents of this city helped to demoralize the enemy as much as it inspired our forces, leading to the complete victory over the rebels that successfully preserved the religion, laws, and liberties of this kingdom—the undeniable blessings of His Majesty’s government.’

Details of the disbursements of the Fund are given in appendices which are printed below, and are interesting in the present time of war for the sake of comparison with similar modern activities. They are printed from an original copy of the Report in the editor’s possession.

Details of the Fund's disbursements are provided in the appendices printed below, and they're interesting to compare with similar modern activities during this time of war. They are printed from an original copy of the Report in the editor's possession.

[Appendix No. I. is the List of Subscriptions.]

[Appendix No. I. is the List of Subscriptions.]


[Pg 431]

[Pg 431]

APPENDIX No. II

An Account of the Necessaries contracted for, their Patterns and Price.

An Account of the Essentials bought, their Styles and Cost.

STOCKINGS.
Long Hose, furnished by Mr. Stiles, made in Westmoreland, and by him delivered at 12s. per Dozen Pair 10,000 Pair.
(Short Hose.) Collected by Mr. Samuel Handley, in and about London, and by him delivered at the Rate of 11s. 10d. per Dozen Pair, he declining to make any Profit thereby 6,504 Pair.
——————
16,504 Pair.
BREECHES.
Contracted for with Messrs. Fullagar and Allen, to be made of Kersey of the Value of 40s. the Piece, half of them to be red and half blue, of three Sizes, viz. 2ds, 3ds, and 4ths, at the Rate of 3s.d. each Pair, with as good Lining, and of the same Make as the Patterns, delivered in sealed, and all to be strongly and well sewed, the said Pattern to be the largest of the three Sizes; Two Thousand Pair, or upwards, to be delivered each Week, till the Whole was compleated. 15,000 Pair.
——————
SHIRTS.
Contracted for with Messrs. John and Michael Turner, and Mr. Chambers, at the Price of 3s. 6d. each, all to be made of Scawen’s ⅞ Garlick of the same Sort and Goodness, with a seal’d Shirt left as a Pattern; and each Shirt to contain 2 Ells ⅞th of Cloth, and to be made of the same Size, and in as good and strong a Manner as the Pattern Shirt, with the Allowance of 2d. per Shirt for 600 to be made somewhat better, being intended for the Serjeants, 1,500 to be delivered Weekly until the Whole was compleated. 12,000
——————
WOOLLEN CAPS.
Contracted with the above-named Messrs. Fullagar and Allen to be made of the same Make and Size with a sealed Pattern delivered in of blue, red, and green, the same to be of Long Ells, of 12d. the Yard, at the Price of 5d. per Cap, the whole Number to be delivered at Guildhall, on the 1st of January, the Contract bearing Date the 20th of December, 1745 10,000
——————
BLANKETS.
Contracted for with Messrs. Brooks, sen. and jun. of Whitney in Oxfordshire, to be nine Quarters wide, and not above 13s. 6d. per Pair 1,000
——————
WOOLLEN GLOVES.
Furnished by Mr. Stiles, in Westmoreland, and delivered, being of different Sizes, at the Rate of 5s. to 6s. and 2d. per dozen Pair, being the prime Cost, he declining to make any Profit thereby. 12,000 Pair.
——————
WOOLLEN ANKLE SPATTERDASHERS.
Contracted for with the above-named Messrs. Fullagar and Allen to be made of three Sizes agreeable to a seal’d Pattern, both as to the Goodness of the Cloth, and Manner of Sewing and Making, with flat Metal Buttons, and the Straps of Ruffia Drab, of the Price of Eighteen Pence Halfpenny a Pair 9,100 Pair.
——————
[Pg 432]

APPENDIX No. III

Containing an Account of the Distribution of the Sum of 4000l. amongst the Regiments engaged at Culloden, the Number on the Spot, and the Sums allowed to each, according to the Apportionment transmitted by his Royal Highness the Duke.

Containing an Account of the Distribution of the Sum of 4000l. among the Regiments involved at Culloden, the Number present, and the Amount allocated to each, based on the Apportionment sent by his Royal Highness the Duke.

Regiments. Numbers on the Spot. Sums allowed to each.
Serjts. Corps. Drum. Private. l. s. d.
Royal (1st) 30 37 26 420 265 10 11
Howard (3rd) 24 23 16 493 281 0
Barrell (4th) 20 23 10 365 213 1
Wolfe (8th) 19 22 18 387 225 17
Pulteney (13th) 23 26 18 479 276 5
Price (14th) 22 22 12 339 202 19
Sackville (20th) 23 25 14 464 216 10
Campbell (21st) 22 22 12 336 225 18
Sempil (25th) 20 25 19 487 277 0 11
Blakeney (27th) 25 22 12 336 204 8
Cholmondeley (34th) 22 24 15 433 255 8
Fleming (36th) 26 22 14 376 225 8
Dejean (37th) 23 24 19 474 273 1
Conway (48th) 21 22 16 342 205 6 5
Battereau (disbanded) 24 33 18 384 236 3 1
Argyllshire Men 32 30 9 430 259 13
—— —— —— —— ——
376 402 252 6602 3893 14
Serjts. Bombr. Gunnr. Matross. Drum
Train 1 9 15 67 3 102 8 0
——
£ 3996 2
Overplus 3 17 11¼
——
4000 0 0

N.B.—As the Overplus 3l. 17s. 11¼d. could not be divided amongst the Regiments it was distributed to some few particular Objects.

N.B.—Since the Overplus 3l. 17s. 11¼d. couldn't be split among the Regiments, it was given to a few specific individuals.

The above Sums divided in Proportion to the Pay of the several Ranks, give to each Man as follows, viz.

The above amounts divided according to the pay of the different ranks, gives each person the following, viz.

REGIMENTS. | TRAIN.
Serjeant £0 19 | Serjeant £1 18 3
Corporal 0 12 | Bombardier 1 11 11
Drummer and Private Man 0 9 | Gunner 1 5 7
| Matross and Drummer 0 19

APPENDIX No. IV

Containing an Account of the Needy Widows, and Orphans of Officers and Soldiers killed at the Battles of Falkirk and Culloden, who have been relieved by this Subscription.

Containing an account of the needy widows and orphans of officers and soldiers killed at the battles of Falkirk and Culloden, who have been supported by this membership.

Widows and Orphans of Officers.
l
To Lieutenant Colonel Whitney’s Widow 100
Major Brown’s Widow 50[Pg 433]
Capt. Grossett’s Widow and 4 Children 150
Capt. Edmonson’s Widow and 1 Child 70
Capt. Launder’s Widow 50
Lieutenant Parry’s Widow and 1 Child 50
Lieutenant Macnaire’s Widow 30
The Widow of Mr. Bourchier and 4 Children 80
—-
580
Widows and Orphans of Serjeants and private Soldiers.
To Hester Mounce (Serjeant’s Widow) and two Daughters 30
Esther Smith, Serjeant’s Widow 17
Ellen Edge (Soldier’s Widow) and five Children 25
Bridget Moore and two Children 20
Jane Fishborne and one Child 15
Widow Nickle and four Children 30
Widow Cole and two Children 20
Widow Perkins and one Child 15
Widow Richards and two Children 20
Widow Gale and two Children 20
Widow Salisbury 10
Widow Newsham and three Children 25
Widow Craig and one Child 15
Widow Combes and one Child 15
Widow Wright and four Children 30
Widow Herbert and two Children 20
Widow Bolton 10
Two Orphans of John Johnson 10
Nineteen other Widows of private Men belonging to the Glasgow Regiment, at 5l. each 95
Forty Six Orphans at 3l. each 138
——
In all £1160
——-

APPENDIX No. V

Containing an Account of the particular Disbursements.

Containing an Account of the specific Expenses.

l. s. d.
To Messrs. Stiles for 10,000 Pair of long Stockings, and for Wrappers, Package, &c. 508 10 0
To Mr. Handley for 6500 Pair of short ditto, with Charges of Delivery 321 5 2
To Messrs. Fullagar and Allen for 15,000 Pair of Breeches 2468 15 0
To Messrs. John and Michael Turner for 6000 Shirts 1052 10 0
To Mr. Abraham Chambers for 6000 ditto 1052 10 0
To Messrs. Fullagar and Allen for 10,000 Caps 208 6 8
To Messrs. Brookes, sen. and jun. for 1000 Blankets 337 10 0
To Messrs. Stiles for 12,000 Pair of Woollen Gloves, with the Wrappers, &c. 289 18 8
To Messrs. Fullagar and Allen for 9100 Pair of Spatterdashers. 322 5 10
To the Right Honourable Stephen Poyntz, Esq. for the Use of the Duke’s Hospital 300 0 0
To the Maimed and Wounded Soldiers from Preston-Pans 150 0 0
To Mr. Cuthbert Smith, Mayor of Newcastle, for the Use of the sick Soldiers in those Parts 300 0 0
To ditto, for his Disbursements 26 13 10[Pg 434]
To Mr. Alderman Winterbottom, for Package of Goods sent to Scotland 87 4 6
To his Royal Highness the Duke, for the maim’d and wounded at Falkirk 300 0 0
To his Royal Highness the Duke—To be paid for distinguished Acts of Service £1000 Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize. 6000 0 0
To his Royal Highness the Duke—To be divided amongst the Regiments engaged at Culloden 4000
To his Royal Highness the Duke—To be given to the Subalterns 1000
To Mr. Luke Bell, the Committee’s Agent, for his Trouble and Subsistence in Scotland, in looking after the Goods sent thither 124 9 2
To the Widows and Orphans of several Officers and Soldiers 1160 0 0
To several Soldiers by particular Recommendations 20 1 0
To Mr. Ford, the Committee’s Secretary, his Bill of Disbursements for Insurance of Goods to Scotland, printing Advertisements, Postage of Letters, and other incident Expences 209 18 3
To ditto, as a Gratuity, for himself and Clerk 200 0 0
To the Chamberlain’s Clerks, Hall-Keepers, Messengers and Attendants 117 15 0
——————
15,557 13 1
Proposed by the Committee to allow.
l. s. d.
To St. Bartholomew’s Hospital 1000 0 0 } Being the Ballance 3352 7 8
To St. Thomas’s 1000 0 0
To the General Hospital at Bath 1000 0 0
To the three Infirmaries of London, Westminster, and Hyde-Park-Corner. 300 0 0
To Expences attending the closing of Accounts and printing the Report. 52 7 8
——————
Total of the Money Subscribed 18,910 0 9
——————

APPENDIX V
CARDINAL YORK’S LETTER TO THE POPE __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

This document, which belongs to the Earl of Galloway, is printed by his kind permission. The manuscript bears the following endorsement:—

This document, owned by the Earl of Galloway, is printed with his generous permission. The manuscript has the following note:—

‘Cardinal of York’s Memorial presented to Pope Clement 13th on the absurdity of the See of Rome in refusing to acknowledge the title of the Cardinal’s Brother (Charles Edward) to the Crown of England on the death of their father in 1766.

‘Cardinal of York’s Memorial presented to Pope Clement 13th on the absurdity of the See of Rome in refusing to acknowledge the title of the Cardinal’s Brother (Charles Edward) to the Crown of England on the death of their father in 1766.

‘This paper was given me by my revered Relative, Dr. John Cooke, President of C.C.C., who was at Rome at this time, and well known to Cardinal York, tho’ a firm

‘This paper was given to me by my respected relative, Dr. John Cooke, President of C.C.C., who was in Rome at that time and was well known to Cardinal York, although a firm

[Pg 435]

[Pg 435]

Protestant, in early life he was a friend to the legitimate Succession.—It is not improbable that he copied this from the original manuscript.

Protestant, in his early life, he supported the rightful Succession.—It’s likely that he borrowed this from the original manuscript.

V. T.
‘June 16, 1825.’

V. T.
‘June 16, 1825.’

A letter from the Hon. Charles Stewart, fellow of All Souls, afterwards the Bishop of Quebec, to his brother, the eighth Earl of Galloway, dated Nov. 26th, 1825, explains that the initials on the endorsement are those of the Rev. Vaughan Thomas, at one time of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. Mr. Thomas desired that the manuscript should be given to Lord Galloway, whom he considered to be the proper person to possess so interesting a Stuart document.

A letter from the Hon. Charles Stewart, a fellow of All Souls who later became the Bishop of Quebec, to his brother, the eighth Earl of Galloway, dated November 26, 1825, explains that the initials on the endorsement belong to Rev. Vaughan Thomas, who was formerly at Corpus Christi College, Oxford. Mr. Thomas wanted the manuscript to be given to Lord Galloway, whom he believed was the right person to have such an interesting Stuart document.

MEMORIA

MEMORY

Sopra la necessità indispensabile, nella quale si trova la Santa Sede di dover riconoscere per unici, e legittimi Successori del Regno d’Inghilterra la Real Casa Stuarda, e sopra la Incoérenza ed assurdi, che ne seguirebbero dal fare il contrario con poco decoro della Santa Sedi Medesima.

Sopra la necessità indispensabile, nella quale si trova la Santa Sede di dover riconoscere per unici, e legittimi Successori del Regno d’Inghilterra la Real Casa Stuarda, e sopra la Incoérenza ed assurdi, che ne seguirebbero dal fare il contrario con poco decoro della Santa Sedi Medesima.

Chi stende la memoria si dichiara di non voler aprire un libro appoggiando i suoi Raziocinj su i fatti pubblici e notorj.

Chi stende la memoria si dichiara di non voler aprire un libro appoggiando i suoi Raziocinj su i fatti pubblici e notorj.

Niuno nel Mondo ignora qualmente il Rè Giacomo Secondo fù cacciato dal suo Regno unicamente in odium Religionis. Gl’istissi Fanton della di lui espulsione erano i primi a non mettere in controversia due principj infallibili. Il primo, che il Regno d’Inghilterra era di sua natura successivo; Il Secondo che la Real Persona di Giacomo Secondo fosse il legittimo Successore: Per ritrovare adunque un apparente pretesto di cacciarnelo senza distruggere il diritto della successione che secondo le leggi è inalterabile, per servire ai loro disegni misero fuori le stabilimento già fatto per legge nel Regno della Religione Anglicana; e piantando per Massima, che l’essere il Rè Cattolico fosse un imminente e continuo péricolo della distruzzione e sovversione di tal legge, fecero un Decreto di Parlamento in cui pretendendo di Spiegare lo Spirito della legge di successione dichiarono nel tempo stesso, che non potesse essere atto a succedere chiunque fosse della Religione Cattolica o ricusasse di conformassi alla Religione dominante.

No one in the world is unaware of how King James II was removed from his throne solely "in hatred of religion." The very ghosts of his expulsion were the first to not dispute two undeniable principles. The first was that the Kingdom of England was, by its nature, hereditary; the second was that King James II was the legitimate successor. To find an apparent excuse to remove him without undermining the unchanging right of succession as dictated by law, they exploited the established laws of the Anglican Church. By asserting that being a Catholic King posed a constant and imminent threat to the destruction and subversion of such laws, they enacted a Parliamentary decree in which, while pretending to explain the spirit of the succession law, they simultaneously declared that anyone who was Catholic or refused to conform to the dominant religion could not succeed to the throne.

In Virtù dunque di questo atto fù ingiustamente, ed iniquamente cacciato Giacomo Secondo e la sua prole cattolica dal suo regno e chiamato a succedere il più prossimo erede Protestanti,[Pg 436] il che ha prosequito fino a dì nostri non solamente nelle Persone delle due Figlie dell’ istisso Giacomo Secondo per essere Protestanti ma ancora nelle Persone dei Principi della casa d’Hannover, per essere questi i più prossimi Eredi Protestanti; in prova di che chiunque è ben informato delle Storie di Principi di questo secolo, sà, che la Principissa Anna, da loro chiamata Regina, volendo favorire Giacomo terzo suo Fratello ad esclusione della casa di Hannover spedi persone accreditate per indurlo a dichiararsi Protestante ed in questa maniera togliere l’unico impedimento, che ostasse al possesso del di lui Regno, ma quella medesima assistenza speciale di Dio, che diè forza a Giacomo Secondo suo Padre di Sagrificare trè Regni per la S. Fede, diè altresi forza al di lui Figlio di ricusare corragiosamente si fatta proposizione per ricuperarli.

Due to this act, James II and his Catholic heirs were unjustly and unfairly expelled from his kingdom, and the next nearest Protestant heir was called to succeed him,[Pg 436] a situation that has continued to this day, not only affecting the two daughters of James II for being Protestants but also the princes of the House of Hanover, as they are the closest Protestant heirs. Those who are well-informed about the history of princes in this century know that Princess Anne, whom they called Queen, wanted to support her brother James III to the exclusion of the House of Hanover. She sent trusted individuals to persuade him to declare himself a Protestant and thereby remove the only obstacle to his claim to the throne. However, the same special assistance from God that gave strength to James II, his father, to sacrifice three kingdoms for the Holy Faith also gave his son the courage to refuse such a proposition to reclaim them.

Ciò presupposto è cosa indubitata, che anche a Giorni nostri la S. Sede non canonizza niun trattato di Pace, a cui per mezzo de’ suoi Ministri non intervenga, e molto meno approva qualunque atto, che possa essere o direttamente o indirettamente lesivo de’ suoi dritti e della S. Chiesa, il di cui Capo è il Sommo Pontefice Vicario di Gesù Cristo; Anzi a Misure, che se ne danno le occasioni, vi si fanno contro le dovute proteste. Or’ chi può mettere in dubbio, o negare, che possa darsi un Decreto pubblico più direttamente contrario alla nostra S. Fede, e conseguentamente più lesivo dei dritti della S. Madre Chiesa di quello di cui si tratta; per mezzo del quale viene privato dei diritto della successione chiunque porta impresso il fortunato carattere di essere di lei figliuolo. Quindi e che i sommi Pontefici principiando da Innocenzo 11o di Santa Memoria giudicarono non essere uopo di fare alcuna esplicita protesta contro di un si iniquo decreto servendosi e bastandogli in luogo di questa il continuato riconoscimento, che ha fatto la S. Sede della Casa Reale Stuarda per gli unici e legittimi successori del Regno, in consequenza di che veniva la S. Sede medesima a risguardare per nullo il Decreto stesso che per indiretto e tacitamente averebbe approvato sempre che soltanto negato avesse ai legittimi Successori Cattolici il dovuto riconoscimento.

This is a well-established fact that even today, the Holy See does not canonize any peace treaty where its ministers are not involved, and even more so does not approve of any act that could be directly or indirectly harmful to its rights and to the Holy Church, whose head is the Supreme Pontiff, the Vicar of Jesus Christ. Moreover, when opportunities arise, proper protests are made against such measures. Now, who can doubt or deny that there could be a public decree that is more directly opposed to our Holy Faith and consequently more harmful to the rights of the Holy Mother Church than the decree in question? Through this decree, anyone who bears the fortunate mark of being her child is deprived of the right of succession. Therefore, starting with Pope Innocent III of blessed memory, the Supreme Pontiffs deemed it unnecessary to make any explicit protest against such an unjust decree, relying instead on the continuous recognition by the Holy See of the House of Stuart as the only legitimate successors to the kingdom. Consequently, the Holy See itself regarded the decree as null since it would indirectly and silently have approved it, as long as it denied the legitimate Catholic successors the due recognition.

Ed infatti vi passa un gran divanò fra l’indispensabile riconoscimento che far dee la S. Sede della Real Casa Stuarda, ad esclusione di quella di Hanover da quel chepassa nel riconoscimento almeno implicito, che fa la medesima S. Sede di altri Principi Eretici. Per modo di esempio; il Papa certamente nè tratta nè ha corrispondenza alcuna coi Rè di Svezia e di Danimarca, ma ciò unicamente per essere Eglino Eretici, non già[Pg 437] perche loro impugno neghi la legittima successione dell’essere di Rè; Quindi nei Diarj stessi stampati coll’ approvazione della Corte di Roma, non si fa difficultà di enunciarli per Rè di Svezia, per Rè di Danimarca; ma nel caso nostro non solo può il sommo Pontefice trattare direttamente colla casa di Hanover per essere Eretica, ma neppur può in alcun modo nè anche tacitamente riconoscere il Capo di quella per legittimo successore del Regno d’lnghilterra; Poiche verrebbe in tal guisa a canonizzare, ed ammettere direttamente per valido e sussistente il sudetto inique Decreto.

Ed indeed, there is a significant divide between the necessary recognition that the Holy See must give to the Royal House of Stuart, excluding that of Hanover as far as the recognition at least implicitly given by the Holy See to other Heretical Princes. For example, the Pope certainly does not engage with or correspond with the Kings of Sweden and Denmark, but this is solely because they are Heretics, not because they deny the legitimate succession of kingship. Therefore, in the very published Diaries approved by the Court of Rome, there is no difficulty in referring to them as the Kings of Sweden and Denmark; but in our case, not only can the Supreme Pontiff not engage directly with the House of Hanover due to its heretical nature, he cannot even tacitly recognize its head as the legitimate successor to the Kingdom of England; for doing so would effectively canonize and directly validate the aforementioned unjust Decree.[Pg 437]

Di tutti questi fatti e principj si è Veduto dal mondo intero a qual segno era persuasa ed imbevuta la S. Mem. di Clemente undecimo il quale nell’atto di ricevere, e di abbracciare con paterno amore la Maestà di Giacomo terzo, allorchi per suo unico rifugio in virtù dei Frattati di Pace, ai quali tutti gli altri Principi Cattolici, esclusone il sommo Pontefice, astretti furono di acconsentire, si portò nello stato Ecclesiastico, e successivamente a Roma: Persuaso, dico, il S. Padre ed imbevuto delle sudette massime e sentimenti non si contentò di riconoscere, e di trattare la Real Persona di Giacomo terzo per unico e legittimo Rè d’lnghilterra, ma intendendo di volere nella di lui Persona riconoscere tutta la Regia sua Prosapia, non lasciò nè mezzi nè industrie per carcarne la propagazione ed in consequenza procurargli un legittimo successore: Epperò effettuato, che fù il matrimonio di Giacomo terzo colla Principessa Sobieskj; facilitato non poco da qualche Lettera del Papa scritta all’ Imperadore: Frà pochi mesi divenne gravida la Regina e circa gli ultimi giorni dell’ anno 1720 trovossi prossima al parto; ed allora il S. Padre conoscendo da una parte la necessità di dover rendere incontastabile la legitimazione del Parto, e dall’ altra intendendo l’obligo preciso, in cui ritrovasi la S. Sede, per non contradire a se stessa, e per vie più sempre fare atti protestativi contro l’accennato ingiusto Decreto, di riconoscere la futura prole qual Erede Presuntivo, e legittimo successore del Regno d’Inghilterra si accensa a fare questo atto colla maggiore solennità possibile; Perlocchi volle il S. Padre, che fossero chiamate per essere presenti al parto, il Sagro Collegio, il Senato Romano, i primi Prelati e Principi Romani, e la primaria Nobilità di Roma; E Siccome la Maestà della Regina stento a partorire per lo spazio di tre giorni in circa in tutto questo tempo farono ripiene le Anticamere di Sua Maestà dei riferti rispettabilissimi Personaggi, i quali vicendevolmente surrogavansi gli uni agli altri, con avervi ancora[Pg 438] pernottato alcuni dei Signori Cardinali. In mezzo adunque di consesso così rispettabile nacque ai 31 di Dicembre dell’anno Sudetto Carlo Odoardo Principe di Galles riconosciuto per tale e consequentamente per Erede presuntivo della Corona dal Medesimo sommo Pontefice, il quale non tardo punto a farlo annunziare a tutto il Popolo per mezzo dello Sparo del Cannone di Castello. E qui sia lecito riflettere che se il Rè Giacomo terzo stato fosse in pacifico possesso del suo Trono, non poteva il sudetto nato Principe ricevere maggiori onori, ed atti più declaratorj del suo dritto successivo alla corona. La sola formalità, che per parte della S. Sede rimanere poteva al compimento di questi atti si era la tradizione delle Fascie Benedette solite mandarsi ai soli Eredi necessarj delle Teste Coronate, non già Elettive, ma unicamenta successive: Ma perchi cessò di vivere la S. Memoria di Clemente undecimo, prima che fossero del tutto terminate le dette Fascie, toccò al di lui successore Innocenzo tredecimo compire questo ultimo atto, com’ Egli fece colla maggior Solennità possibile mandando a questo effetto preciso un obligato con tutte le formalità e ceremonie solite pratticarsi colle oltre Corti.

Di tutte queste cose e principi si è visto in tutto il mondo quanto fosse persuaso e coinvolto il Santo Padre Clemente undicesimo, il quale, nel momento di ricevere e abbracciare con paterno amore la Maestà di Giacomo terzo, quando per lui unico rifugio, grazie ai Frattati di Pace, a cui tutti gli altri Principi Cattolici, escluso il Papa, erano stati costretti ad acconsentire, si portò nello stato ecclesiastico e successivamente a Roma. Convinto, dico, il Santo Padre ed influenzato da questi principi e sentimenti, non si accontentò di riconoscere e trattare la persona regale di Giacomo terzo come unico e legittimo Re d’Inghilterra, ma volendo conoscere in lui tutta la sua genealogia regale, non risparmiò né mezzi né sforzi per garantirne la propagazione e, di conseguenza, procurargli un legittimo successore. Così, realizzato il matrimonio di Giacomo terzo con la Principessa Sobieski, facilitato anche da alcune lettere scritte dal Papa all'Imperatore, dopo pochi mesi la Regina rimase incinta e verso la fine dell'anno 1720 si trovò prossima al parto; e allora il Santo Padre, riconoscendo da un lato la necessità di rendere incontestabile la legittimazione del nascituro, e dall'altro comprendendo l'obbligo in cui si trovava la Santa Sede, per non contraddire a se stessa e continuare a fare atti protestativi contro l’ingiusto decreto, decise di riconoscere la futura prole come Erede Presuntivo e legittimo successore del Regno d’Inghilterra, attuando questo atto con la massima solennità possibile. Pertanto, il Santo Padre volle che fosse presente al parto il Sacro Collegio, il Senato Romano, i maggiori Prelati e Principi Romani, e la nobiltà di Roma; e, poiché la Regina stentò a partorire per tre giorni, in tutto questo tempo le anticamere di Sua Maestà furono piene di rispettabili personaggi, che si alternavano tra loro, con alcuni dei Signori Cardinali che vi pernottarono. Così, in mezzo a una tale assemblea rispettabile, nacque il 31 di Dicembre dell’anno suddetto Carlo Odoardo Principe di Galles, riconosciuto come tale e quindi come Erede presuntivo della Corona dal medesimo sommo Pontefice, il quale non tardò a farlo annunciare a tutto il popolo attraverso il colpo di cannone del Castello. E qui è lecito riflettere che, se il Re Giacomo terzo fosse stato in pacifico possesso del suo trono, il suddetto nato Principe non avrebbe potuto ricevere onori e atti di riconoscimento superiori al suo diritto di successione alla corona. L'unica formalità che avrebbe potuto rimanere da parte della Santa Sede per completare questi atti era la tradizione delle Fascie Benedette solite da inviare ai soli eredi necessari delle teste coronate, non elettive, ma unicamente successive. Ma poiché la Santa Memoria di Clemente undicesimo cessò di vivere prima che le suddette fascie fossero completamente terminate, toccò al suo successore Innocenzo tredicesimo completare questo ultimo atto, come egli fece con la massima solennità, inviando a questo effetto preciso un obbligato con tutte le formalità e cerimonie che si praticano con le corti superiori.

Da tutto questo racconto non si può negare che appariscono nel suo pieno le obligazioni che ha la Real Casa Stuarda alla S. Mem. di Clemente undecimo, ma appariscono altrettanto quanto stava a cuore di quel sommo Pontefice il decoro della S. Sede e come ben intendeva l’indispensabile necessità da cui era astretta a Sostenere inviolabili i Dritti della Casa Reale Sudetta: Videva benissimo il S. Padre, che tutti questi replicati atti di riconoscimento dovevano necessariamente inasperire il Governo d’Inghilterra massimamente contro i Cattolici ed in conseguenza essere in qualche maniera di Ostacolo al buon successo delle missioni; Capiva altrasi che egli solo era l’unico Principe Cattolico, che faceva questi atti di riconoscimento: con tutto ciò tenendo avanti gli Occhi la giustizia della causa che diveniva punto di Religione, l’abborrimento che non mai abbastanza poteva rimostrare la S. Sede al Sopracitato Decreto, e per fine l’obbligo preciso de’ suoi Successori in non dipartirsi giammai da quanto Egli faceva a prò di una Famiglia si bene merita della S. Sede, non esitò punto di eseguirli con tante Solennità, per mezzo delle quali toglieva a Suoi Medesimi Successori qualunque ragione di dubbio circa il trattamento dovuto al Principe di Galles, seguita la morte del di lui Padre; Giacche sapeva benissimo il sommo Pontefice che riconosciutosi una volta dalla S. Sede per Erede presuntivo di un Regno un[Pg 439] Figlio, non può mettere in dubbio alla morte del di lui Padre, che gli Succeda in tutto, ed in conseguenza nella sua dignita e ne’suoi onori; In quella guisa appunto, che nell’ Impero (non ostante che sia stato elettivo) riconosciutosi una volta dalla S. Sede alcuno Rè de’ Romani non può Ella dispensarsi, Seguita la morte dell’ Imperadore, dal riconoscerlo per di lui Successore.

Da tutto questo racconto non si può negare che emergano chiaramente le obbligazioni che ha la Real Casa Stuarda nei confronti della S. Mem. di Clemente undicesimo, ma si evidenzia anche quanto fosse importante per quel sommo Pontefice il decoro della S. Sede e come comprendesse la necessità imprescindibile di sostenere inviolabili i diritti della Casa Reale Sudetta. Il S. Padre vedeva benissimo che tutti questi ripetuti atti di riconoscimento avrebbero necessariamente inasprito il Governo inglese, specialmente contro i cattolici, e quindi avrebbero potuto ostacolare il buon esito delle missioni. Comprendeva anche che egli era l'unico Principe cattolico a compiere questi atti di riconoscimento. Tuttavia, tenendo sempre a mente la giustizia della causa che diventava questione di religione, l’ avversione che la S. Sede non poteva mai esprimere abbastanza contro il sopracitato decreto, e infine l'obbligo preciso dei suoi successori di non discostarsi mai da quanto lui stava facendo a favore di una famiglia così meritevole della S. Sede, non esitò affatto a compierli con tante solenni cerimonie, attraverso le quali eliminava ai suoi stessi successori ogni ragione di dubbio riguardo al trattamento dovuto al Principe di Galles, dopo la morte del suo padre. Sapeva benissimo il sommo Pontefice che, una volta riconosciuto dalla S. Sede come erede presuntivo di un regno, un figlio non può mettere in dubbio, alla morte del padre, che gli succeda in tutto, e quindi nella sua dignità e nei suoi onori. Proprio in questo modo, nell'impero (anche se è stato elettivo), riconosciuto una volta dalla S. Sede un re dei Romani, non può essa dispensarsi, dopo la morte dell'imperatore, dal riconoscerlo come suo successore.

Pieno pertanto il glorioso Clemente undecimo di questi giustissimi sentimenti nell’ atto stesso di morire, volle manifestare a tutto il sagro collegio qual si fosse la sua premura perchè costantemente si mantenesse quanto Egli aveva fatto verso la Real Casa, facendogli sù di ciò una speciale raccomandazione. Fedelissimi e zelosissimi Esecutori delle Operazioni e del Testamento di un tanto Papa sono Stati tutti i Pontefici successori principiando da Innocenzo Tredecimo fino a Clemente Tredecimo felicemente regnante, tutti hanno trattato e risguardato il Figlio Primogenito di Giacomo terzo come Principe di Galles; cioè Successore del Regno d’Inghilterra. Quindi dacchi il Principe cominciò ad essere ammesso all’ udienza dei Sommi Pontefici non vi è stata mai la minima difficoltà circa il trattamento, anzi non mettendosi in dubbio, che trà le altre distinzioni competer gli dovesse una sedia a braccio simile a quella del Rè suo Padre; (il che è lo stile della S. Sede verso gli Eredi presuntivi di un Regno). A questa sola particolarità pregò la Maestà del Re, che si dovesse derogare in sua presenza a solo ed unico fine mantenere lo stile del Regno d’Inghilterra, che porta non possa ne anche il Figlio Primogenito sedere in ugual sedia col Padre presente, e per aderire a queste brame della Maestà sua gli è stata sempre data una sedia Camerale di appoggio, ma bensì senza bracci.

Pieno, therefore, the glorious Clement XI, in the very act of dying, wanted to show the entire sacred college how important it was to him that what he had done for the Real Casa be consistently maintained, especially recommending it to them. The faithful and zealous executors of the actions and will of such a Pope have been all the succeeding Popes, starting from Innocent XIII to the currently reigning Clement XIII. They have all respected and treated the Firstborn Son of James III as the Prince of Wales; that is, as the successor to the Kingdom of England. Since the Prince began to be received in audience by the Supreme Pontiffs, there has never been the slightest difficulty regarding his treatment. In fact, it has never been doubted that among other distinctions he should have an armchair similar to that of his Father the King; (which is the tradition of the Holy See towards presumptive heirs of a kingdom). For this particular matter, His Majesty the King requested that an exception be made in his presence solely to maintain the style of the Kingdom of England, which states that the Firstborn Son cannot sit in the same chair as the Father present. In line with these wishes of His Majesty, he has always been provided with a supporting chair, but without arms.

Rimane ora ad esaminare le contradizzioni, ed assurdi, che ne seguirebbero ogni qual volta la S. Sede negasse di riconoscere il Principe di Galles per legittimo successore del Rè suo Padre alla morte di medesimo; Sarebbero questi fuor di dubbio senza numero, nè si facile sarebbe l’accennarli tutti; pure ne scorreremo alcuni. E Primieramente siccome il Principe di Galles per lo spazio ornai di 45 anni e stato in possesso del titolo e delle prerogative di Principe di Galles, non si gli passono ora negare, o sia egli presente o sia assente, senza derogare e contradire espressamente agli atti più solenni di sei Papi consecutivi. In Secondo luogo ne seguirebbe, che quella medesima, Persona, alla quale la S. Sede oggi dà trattamento e risguarda come Principe di Galles (che vale a dire successore naturale del[Pg 440] Regno d’Inghilterra, come lo e il Delfino in Francia, ed il Principe di Asturias in Spagna) domani verrendo a morte del Padre, se si ricusa, quando Ella ne da parte, di riconoscerla come succeduta al Padre medesimo nella dignità ed onori col fatto si nega, che sia stato Principe di Galles. In terzo luogo qual trattamento potrà darsi, morto il Padre, al Sudetto Principe? Forse di Principe di Galles? Ma si avverta ch’ Egli non lo è più. Dunque o gli compete lo stesso trattamento ch’ aveva il Padre a cui è succeduto, o converrà dire che non gli competeva per tanti anni il titolo, e le prerogative di Successore. Quarto, Affinche il Papa faccia una innovazione di questa natura contradittoria ed opposto allo Stabilimento di suoi Antecessori vi vuol qualche causa quale certamente non vi è ni vi può essere; poichè se alcuno di Principi Cattolici sono stati costretti a retrocedere dal riconoscere la Real Casa Stuarda per legittimo Erede e Successore del Regno d’Inghilterra; è avvenuto in consequenza dei diversi trattati di Pace col presente Governo d’Inghilterra che li metteva in necessità di riconoscere la Successione Eretica com’ era stata stabilita dal famoso Decreto del Parlamento: Ma tal causa ogn’ un ben vede che non può addursi dal S. Padre in alcun modo: Egli non ha mai fatto, nè puo fore trattati di alcuna sorta co’ Principi Eretici; Egli neppure ha aderito in questa parte ai sudetti trattati di Pace di altri Principi: Sopra tutto Egli non hà potuto mai nè può riconoscere per valido, o sussistente il famoso riferito Decreto contro del quale, come si è accennato di Sopra, serve d’incontrastabile protesta il continuato riconoscimento della Casa Reale Stuarda. Anzi da qui verrebbe il quinto assurdo di gravissimo pregiudizio alla S. Sede, e con ammirazione di tutti i buoni, mentre cessando di riconoscere il Principe di Galles come successore del Rè suo Padre, verrebbe il Papa in certa maniera a rivocare tutte le proteste fatte da’ suoi Antecessori, e se ne inferirebbe una pregiudizievolissima consequenza; Cioè che quando in un stato Eretico il Principe si faccia Cattolico sia in facoltà di Sudditi per questo solo motivo di escluderlo dal Principato. Sesto, che non vede l’assurdo gravissimo, che ne succederebbe ne’ pubblichi Diarj stampati fin’ ora coll’ autorità della S. Seda sempre per lo spazio di tanti anni in una stessa Maniera? Sotto il Titolo d’Inghilterra dovrà forse Scriversi Giorgio Terzo? Ma questo non si può, mentre non vi ha mai avuto luogo, ne può l’essere riconosciuto per Rè dal Papa. Dovrà dunque lasciarsi sotto il sudetto titolo Carlo Odoardo Principe di GallesEnrico Benedetto Duce di[Pg 441] York. Ma il Padre dov è? Se egli è morto, non vi è più Principe di Galles. Dunque questo Titolo non gli compete. Sicchè o bisogna indicarlo per Rè o bisogna cassarlo, è cassare anzi per sempre il titolo d’Inghilterra, come se più non vi fosse.

Now let’s examine the contradictions and absurdities that would arise whenever the Holy See refused to acknowledge the Prince of Wales as the legitimate successor of his father upon his death; these would undoubtedly be countless, and it would be challenging to mention them all, but let’s go through a few. First, since the Prince of Wales has held the title and privileges of Prince of Wales for 45 years, it cannot now be denied to him, whether he is present or absent, without explicitly contradicting the most solemn acts of six consecutive Popes. Secondly, it would follow that the same person, whom the Holy See today honors and treats as Prince of Wales (meaning the natural successor to the[Pg 440] English throne, just as the Dauphin is in France, and the Prince of Asturias in Spain), upon the death of his father, would be disregarded by the Holy See if it refuses to recognize him as having succeeded to his father's dignity and honors, thereby effectively denying that he was ever Prince of Wales. Thirdly, what kind of title can be given to the aforementioned Prince after his father's death? Perhaps he would still be called Prince of Wales? But note that he no longer is. Thus, he either deserves the same treatment his father received, which he has succeeded to, or one must concede that he was not entitled to the title and privileges of successor for all those years. Fourth, for the Pope to make such a contradictory change that opposes the decisions of his predecessors, there must be some justification, which certainly does not exist; for if any Catholic princes have been forced to backtrack on recognizing the Royal House of Stuart as the legitimate heir and successor to the English throne, it was due to various peace treaties with the current government of England that compelled them to recognize the heretical succession as established by the infamous decree of Parliament. But everyone can clearly see that this argument cannot be made by the Holy Father in any way: He has never made, nor can he make any treaties of any kind with heretical princes; neither has he adhered to the aforementioned peace treaties of other princes in this respect. Above all, he has never been able, nor can he now recognize as valid or existing the infamous decree referred to, against which the ongoing recognition of the Royal House of Stuart serves as an undeniable protest. Furthermore, from this arises a fifth absurdity of significant detriment to the Holy See, and to the amazement of all good people, as by ceasing to recognize the Prince of Wales as the successor of the King his Father, the Pope would be, in a sense, revoking all the protests made by his predecessors, leading to a highly prejudicial conclusion; That is, when in a heretical state the Prince becomes Catholic, he may be excluded from the Principality by his subjects for this sole reason. Sixth, how can one not see the grave absurdity that would arise in the public diaries printed thus far under the authority of the Holy See for so many years in the same manner? Under the title of England, should it perhaps be written George III? But this cannot happen, as he has never held the title nor can he be acknowledged as King by the Pope. Therefore, it must remain under the aforementioned title Charles Edward Prince of WalesHenry Benedict Duke of[Pg 441] York. But where is the father? If he is dead, there is no longer a Prince of Wales. Thus, this title does not apply to him. Therefore, either he must be indicated as King, or the title must be discarded, effectively abolishing the title of England as if it no longer existed.

Rimane finalmente ad esaminare, se nelle circostanze presente della S. Sede riconoscendo il Papa in caso di morte del Rè Giacomo Terzo il di lui figlio già per tanti anni in possesso del titolo e delle prerogative di Principe di Galles per di lui successore nelle dignità ed onori, possa a giusta ragione ciò chiamarsi novità. Chi scrive si appella al mondo tutto, ai nemici medesimi della casa Reale, ma già da questi stessi sente replicarsi ad una voce, che sarebbe anzi novità per la S. Sede fare il contrario, sarebbe contradizione a se stessa, sarebbe approvare ciò che non può approvare, e per fine si usarebbe una grandissima ostilità alla casa Reale in benemerenza di avere sagrificati trè Regni per la S. Fede, privandola col fatto del solo asilo, in cui possa risedere con decoro, e di cui è stata in possesso per il decorso di tanti anni. Ne vi è certamente Principe Cattolico che non conosca per tutti i motivi sopradetti l’indispensabile necessità in cui trovasi la S. Sede di non fare altrimenti, e capiscono tutti benissimo che niun Principe è tenuto a render conto all’altro delle Operazioni, che Egli fa, particolarmente quando sono conseguenze, e principj del proprio Stato: Ed in effete non ostante che tutti i Principi Cattolici in corpo abbiano ultimamente ricusato di riconoscere il Rè di Polonia, ed il solo Papa con due Principi Eretici lo abbiano riconosciuto: Quale però de’ Principi Cattolici ha fatto mai querela sù di ciò al S. Padre, o facendola non fosse per contentarsi di una si giusta risposta, qual sarebbe, che il Papa non è obligato a render ragione delle sue operazione in alcune circostanze; che in questo non ha fatto altro, che seguire le massime, ed i principj della S. Sede: e finalmente, che a lui basta, che gli costi della validità dell’ Elezione, e delle dovute convenienze usate al suo nunzio, e per conseguenza alla sua Persona?

Rimane infine a esaminare se, nelle attuali circostanze della Santa Sede, riconoscendo il Papa nel caso di morte del Re Giacomo III, il suo figlio, già per tanti anni in possesso del titolo e delle prerogative di Principe di Galles, possa giustamente essere considerato una novità. Chi scrive si appella all'intero mondo, anche ai nemici della casa Reale, e già da questi stessi sente rispondere all'unisono che sarebbe al contrario una novità per la Santa Sede fare il contrario; sarebbe una contraddizione per se stessa, approverebbe ciò che non può approvare, e alla fine mostrerebbe una grande ostilità alla casa Reale, che ha sacrificato tre Regni per la Santa Fede, privandola dell'unico rifugio dove possa trovarsi con dignità, e di cui è stata in possesso per tanti anni. Non c'è certamente Principe Cattolico che non comprenda, per tutti i motivi sopraesposti, l'indispensabile necessità per la Santa Sede di non agire diversamente, e tutti capiscono perfettamente che nessun Principe è obbligato a rendere conto a un altro delle operazioni che compie, specialmente quando sono conseguenze e principi del proprio Stato. E infatti, nonostante tutti i Principi Cattolici abbiano recentemente rifiutato di riconoscere il Re di Polonia, solo il Papa e due Principi Eretici lo hanno riconosciuto. Quale però dei Principi Cattolici ha mai protestato riguardo a ciò con il Santo Padre, o se lo ha fatto, non si sarebbe accontentato di una risposta così giusta, quale sarebbe, che il Papa non è obbligato a rendere conto delle sue operazioni in certe circostanze; che in questo non ha fatto altro che seguire i principi e le norme della Santa Sede; e infine, che a lui basta la validità dell'elezione e le dovute convenienze utilizzate dal suo nunzio, e per conseguenza alla sua persona?

Ma nel caso nostro sempre cresce l’argomento, poichè il riconoscimento di un Rè di Polonia potrebbe ammettere qualch’ esame, o discussione, ma qual discussione o esame può mai richiedersi nel riconoscere la legittima successione di un Figlio al Padre dopo la sua morte nelle di lui prerogative ed onori? Non è già questo riconoscimento come quello in realtà, atto nuovo ma bensì una sola necessaria conseguenza di quello, che già fù stabilito da tanti anni dai sommi Pontefici,[Pg 442] allorchì riconobbero il Figlio di Giacomo Terzo. E tutti gli argomenti, che addurre si potrebbero, acciochè la S. Sede facesse una simil novità di dispensarsi dal riconoscere il Principe di Galles alla morte del di lui Genitore per suo legittimo successore, potevano addursi, ed avevano anzi maggior forza per impedire il riconoscimento del medesimo, in qualità di Principe di Galles dalla S. Mem. di Clemente undecimo con tutte quelle circostanze e solennità già riferite, mentre in quei tempi il Papa fù il Solo Principe Cattolico, che riconobbe il Figlio di Giacomo Terzo per Principe di Galles. E quantunque la casa di Hanover si avvedesse che questo atto fosse un impegno preso dalla S. Sede (come certamente lo era) di doverlo in appresso riconoscere per legittimo successore del Padre dopo la di lui morte, ciò non ostante non apportò alcuno di quei cattivi effetti, forse ideati, o tenuti da alcuna Persone poco informate e prattiche dello stato delle cose in quel Regno.

Ma nel nostro caso l'argomento continua a crescere, poiché il riconoscimento di un re di Polonia potrebbe richiedere qualche esame o discussione. Ma quale discussione o esame si può mai avere nel riconoscere la legittima successione di un figlio al padre dopo la sua morte nelle sue prerogative e onori? Non è forse questo riconoscimento simile a quello reale, un atto nuovo, ma piuttosto una semplice necessaria conseguenza di quanto già stabilito tanti anni fa dai sommi pontefici, quando riconobbero il figlio di Giacomo Terzo? E tutti gli argomenti che si potrebbero portare per convincere la Santa Sede a fare una simile novità nel non riconoscere il Principe di Galles come legittimo successore alla morte del suo genitore, avevano anzi più forza per impedire il riconoscimento del medesimo, in qualità di Principe di Galles dalla Santa Memoria di Clemente Undecimo, con tutte quelle circostanze e solennità già menzionate. Infatti, in quei tempi, il Papa era l'unico Principe Cattolico che riconobbe il figlio di Giacomo Terzo come Principe di Galles. E sebbene la casa di Hannover si rendesse conto che questo atto era un impegno preso dalla Santa Sede (come certamente lo era) di doverlo successivamente riconoscere come legittimo successore del padre dopo la sua morte, ciò non portò, tuttavia, a nessuno di quegli effetti negativi, forse ideati o sostenuti da persone poco informate e pratiche della situazione in quel regno.

Chi ha scritto questa memoria in ultimo si dichiara, che non ha avuto altro scopo, che togliere i scrupoli di alcuni poco intesi delle cose del mondo, e ribattere le difficoltà che forse suscitar si potrebbe dai nemici non meno della Casa Reale, che della S. Sede. Del resto i protesti veramente tenuti alle continue dimostrazioni di Paterno amore, e clemenze usate dalla Santità di nostro Signore felicemente regnante verso tutta la sudetta casa Reale, che non può neppur sospettare, che mancando a suoi tempi il Rè Giacomo Terzo voglia punto deviare dalle savissime traccie indicatigli da suoi gloriosi Antecessori.

Chi ha scritto questo documento alla fine afferma di non aver avuto altro obiettivo che quello di rassicurare alcuni che non comprendono bene le questioni del mondo e di rispondere alle difficoltà che potrebbero sorgere dai nemici, sia della Casa Reale che della Santa Sede. Inoltre, i protesti veramente espressi alle continue dimostrazioni di amore e clemenza mostrate dalla Santità del nostro Signore, che regna felicemente, verso tutta la suddetta Casa Reale, non possono neppure far sospettare che, in assenza del Re Giacomo Terzo, si voglia deviare dalle sagge tracce indicate dai suoi gloriosi antenati.

Nota:—Siccome dopo stesa la presente memoria, pur troppo non ha mancato più di uno di mettere in dubbio i sentimenti della santità di nostro signore felicemente Regnante verso la Real Casa, quasi che fossero totalmente diversi da quella de’suoi antecessori, ed in conseguenza potersi supporre essere un semplice complimento verso la Santità sua quel tanto che con fiducia si viva presuppone l’Estensore nell’ ultimo della memoria perciò lo stesso ha creduto uno preciso dovere di giustizia, ed insiemi di gratitudine rispettosa verso li S. Padre d’inserire in fine questa stessa memoria tutte le lettere, che possono aver rapporto alla presente risoluzione presa dal Real Principe di Galles di ritornare in questa Capitale; e siccome apparisce più chiaro della luce del sole, quali siano i sentimenti precisi del S. Padre verso la Real Casa, e la Persona del Real Principe di Galles sudetto tanto autenticamente manifestati, così lo[Pg 443] stesso Estensore crede non esservi bisogno di glossa per far conoscere quanto siano insussistenti, e false le precorse assertive, e con quanta ragione e fondamento abbia rimostrato l’Estensore tutta la fiducia e sicurezza nei sentimenti della Santità sua e quanto li abbia ben compresi il Real Principe di Galles, giacchè unicamente in virtù de’ medesimi si è accinto alla risoluziona di restituirsi a Roma.

Note:—Since after writing this memo, unfortunately, more than one person has raised doubts about the feelings of His Holiness, our gracious Sovereign, towards the Royal House, as if they were entirely different from those of his predecessors. Consequently, it could be assumed that what is stated with confidence by the author at the end of this memo is merely a formality towards His Holiness. Therefore, the author felt it was a precise duty of justice and a sign of respectful gratitude towards His Holiness to include at the end of this memo all the letters that may relate to the present resolution made by the Prince of Wales to return to this Capital. And since it is clearer than the sunlight what the actual sentiments of His Holiness are towards the Royal House and the person of the aforementioned Prince of Wales, as so authentically expressed, the author believes there is no need for commentary to demonstrate how unfounded and false the previous assertions are, and how rightly and justifiably the author has shown all the trust and confidence in the sentiments of His Holiness and how well the Prince of Wales has understood them, since it is solely based on these sentiments that he has decided to return to Rome.

Translation[645]

Translation[645]

Concerning the indispensable necessity of recognition, by the Holy See, of the Royal House of Stuart, as the sole and legitimate successors to the Kingdom of England, and concerning the inconsistencies and incongruities which would ensue, should she follow the contrary course, being one which would little become the dignity of the Holy See.

Regarding the essential need for the Holy See to recognize the Royal House of Stuart as the only legitimate successors to the Kingdom of England, and the inconsistencies and contradictions that would arise if it chose a different path, which would not reflect well on the dignity of the Holy See.

He who presents this Memorial wishes to state the case briefly, basing his reasonings on public and well-known facts. No one in the world is ignorant of the fact that King James II. was hunted from his throne in odium Religionis. The very people who were scheming for his expulsion would have been the last to deny two infallible principles. The first—that the Kingdom of England was, of its nature, an hereditary one; the second, that the Royal Person of James II. was the lawful successor. Wishing therefore to find an adequate pretext for deposing him, without destroying the right of succession, which is, by law, unalterable, they, to serve their own ends, brought forward the question of the establishment in the kingdom, already made by law, of the Anglican Religion; and making as their chief complaint, that the fact of the king being a Catholic placed that law in constant and imminent peril of destruction and subversion, they made an Act of Parliament in which, while claiming to explain the spirit of the laws of succession, they declared at the same time that it was not fitting that any one whosoever should succeed who was of the Catholic Religion, or who did not conform to the dominant religion.

The person presenting this Memorial wants to summarize the situation briefly, relying on public and well-known facts. No one is unaware that King James II. was chased from his throne because of his religion. The very people who plotted his removal would have been the last to deny two undeniable principles. The first—that the Kingdom of England was inherently hereditary; the second, that James II. was the rightful successor. Therefore, trying to find a valid reason to depose him without undermining the right of succession, which is, by law, unchangeable, they pushed forward the issue of the Anglican Religion, already established by law in the kingdom. Their main complaint was that the king being Catholic put that law in constant and immediate danger of destruction and subversion. They enacted a law in Parliament that, while claiming to clarify the principles of succession, simultaneously stated that no one who was Catholic or who did not conform to the established religion should be allowed to succeed.

By virtue of this Act, then, were James II. and his Catholic offspring deprived of the throne, and his nearest Protestant relative was called to succeed to it, whose line has continued to do so even to our own days, not only in the persons of James II.’s two daughters, who were Protestants, but also in those of the Princes of the House of Hanover, these being the nearest Protestant heirs; in proof of this, any one who has knowledge of the history of the princes of this century knows that the Princess Anne, called by them Queen, wishing to show favour to her brother James III., to the exclusion of the House of Hanover, sent accredited persons to try to persuade him to declare himself a Protestant, and to remove, in this manner, the only obstacle that stood in the way of his possession of his kingdom: but that special grace of God, which gave[Pg 444] strength to his father, James II., to sacrifice three kingdoms for the Holy Faith, likewise gave strength to his son to refuse courageously any such means of regaining them.

Because of this Act, James II. and his Catholic children were removed from the throne, and his closest Protestant relative was invited to take over. This line has continued to the present, not just through James II.’s two Protestant daughters, but also through the princes of the House of Hanover, who are the nearest Protestant heirs. Anyone familiar with the history of the princes of this century knows that Princess Anne, referred to as Queen, sought to support her brother James III. over the House of Hanover. She even sent trusted individuals to persuade him to declare himself a Protestant, thereby eliminating the only barrier to his reclaiming his kingdom. However, that special grace from God, which empowered his father, James II., to sacrifice three kingdoms for the Holy Faith, also gave his son the strength to bravely refuse such means of regaining them.

This, one may take for granted, is an undoubted fact, that then, as now, the Holy See is bound by no Treaty of Peace, in the arranging of which, by means of her Ministers, she has had no voice, and how much less does she approve of any act that can, either directly or indirectly, infringe on her rights and those of Holy Church, the head of whom is the Supreme Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ: rather should such arise she would make fitting protests.

This is something we can take for granted: it's an undeniable fact that, just like today, the Holy See is not bound by any Peace Treaty in which it had no say through its representatives. Even more so, it disapproves of any actions that could directly or indirectly violate its rights and those of the Holy Church, led by the Supreme Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ. If such situations arise, it would make appropriate protests.

Now can it be questioned that any public decree could be more directly contrary to our Holy Faith, and consequently could infringe more seriously on the rights of Holy Mother Church, than that of which we are treating, by means of which the rights of Succession are denied to any one happy enough to be one of her sons? Hence it is that the Supreme Pontiffs, beginning with Innocent XI. of pious memory, did not deem it necessary to make any explicit protest against such an iniquitous decree, contenting themselves instead with the continued recognition which the Holy See has always accorded to the Royal House of Stuart, as the sole and legitimate successors to the throne, so that the Holy See came to regard this Decree (to which, had she refused to recognise the legitimate Catholic successors, she would have been indirectly and tacitly agreeing,) as null.

Now, can anyone really question that any public decree could be more directly opposed to our Holy Faith, and thus more seriously violate the rights of Holy Mother Church, than the one we’re discussing? This decree denies the rights of Succession to anyone fortunate enough to be one of her children. That’s why the Supreme Pontiffs, starting with Innocent XI. of blessed memory, did not think it necessary to make an explicit protest against such an unjust decree. They were satisfied with the ongoing recognition that the Holy See has always given to the Royal House of Stuart as the only legitimate successors to the throne. Consequently, the Holy See came to consider this Decree—as rejecting the legitimate Catholic successors it would have tacitly and indirectly endorsed—as null.

And indeed, there is a great comparison to be drawn between the recognition given by the Holy See to the Royal House of Stuart, to the exclusion of the House of Hanover, and that which this same Holy See accords to other heretical princes; as, for example, the Pope certainly is in no treaty, and has no correspondence with the Kings of Sweden and Denmark, but this is solely because they are heretics, not because he denies in any way their legitimate right to their succession. Thus, in the papers printed with the approbation of the Court of Rome, no difficulty is raised as to speaking of them as King of Sweden and King of Denmark; but in the case in point, the Most High Pontiff treats directly with this heretical House of Hanover, though he cannot by any means recognise its head as the legitimate successor to the Kingdom of England, so that in this manner he is ratifying the aforesaid iniquitous decree, and directly admitting it as valid and real.

And indeed, a strong comparison can be made between the recognition given by the Holy See to the Royal House of Stuart, while excluding the House of Hanover, and the way this same Holy See acknowledges other heretical rulers. For instance, the Pope certainly has no treaties or correspondence with the Kings of Sweden and Denmark, but this is only because they are heretics, not because he denies their legitimate right to their thrones. Thus, in the documents published with the approval of the Court of Rome, there is no issue in referring to them as the King of Sweden and King of Denmark; however, in this specific case, the Most High Pontiff engages directly with this heretical House of Hanover, even though he cannot recognize its head as the legitimate successor to the Kingdom of England. In this way, he is validating the aforementioned unjust decree and acknowledging it as both valid and real.

It is plainly seen by the whole world how deeply imbued with these facts and principles was Clement XI. of blessed memory, who, when His Majesty King James III. turned to him as his only refuge (on account of the Treaty of Peace, to which all the Catholic princes, with the exception of His Holiness, were constrained to consent), carried him away to the Papal States, and afterwards to Rome: the Holy Father, I say, fully imbued with and convinced of the aforesaid sentiments and truth, did not content himself with simply recognising and treating the royal person of James III. as the sole and legitimate King of England, but, wishing to recognise also all his royal progeny, he spared no trouble to[Pg 445] ensure that the propagation of the line should be carried on, in order to procure him a legitimate successor. This was effected by the marriage of James III. with the Princess Sobieski; which was not a little facilitated by letters written by the Pope to the Emperor. In a few months it became known that the hopes for an heir were to be realised, and towards the last days of the year 1720, as the time of his birth approached, the Holy Father knowing on the one side the necessity of rendering the legitimacy of the birth indisputable, and on the other, realising that the Holy See must in nowise contradict herself, but must act in such a manner as to show most decidedly her protest against the unjust Decree, by recognising the future offspring as heir-apparent and legitimate successor to the throne of England, he took upon himself to see that this event should take place with the greatest possible solemnity; and therefore, by the wish of the Holy Father, there were called to be present at the birth, the Sacred College, the Roman Senate, the highest Roman Princes and Prelates, and the foremost nobility of Rome; and although there was a delay of three days before the birth took place, during the whole of this time the ante-rooms of Her Majesty were filled with these most venerable personages, who relieved one another by turns, while some of the Cardinals sat up each night. Thus, in the midst of so honourable an assembly was born on December 31st of the aforesaid year, Charles Edward, Prince of Wales, acknowledged as such, and consequently as heir-apparent to the Crown, by the Supreme Pontiff himself, who without delay had the birth announced to all the people by means of a salute from the cannon of the castle. And here it is allowable to reflect that even had King James III. been in peaceful possession of his throne the aforesaid newly-born Prince could not have received greater honours, nor could his right to succeed to the Crown have been proclaimed more unquestionably. The only formality which could have put a finishing touch to the rest was the traditional Delivery of the Swaddling Clothes, which it was the custom to send only to the heirs of crowned heads (and then only to those reigning by succession, not by election): but, as Clement XI. of pious memory died before this matter was concluded, it fell to his successor, Innocent XIII., to complete it, which he did with all possible solemnity, sending an ambassador, with all the formality and ceremonies observed with other Courts.

It is clear to everyone how deeply committed Clement XI, of blessed memory, was to these facts and principles. When His Majesty King James III turned to him as his only refuge (due to the Treaty of Peace, which all Catholic princes had to agree to except for His Holiness), Clement took him to the Papal States and then to Rome. The Holy Father, fully aware of and convinced by the aforementioned sentiments and truths, didn’t just recognize and treat King James III as the sole and legitimate King of England; he also wanted to recognize all of his royal descendants, so he did everything he could to ensure that his line would continue to produce a legitimate successor. This was achieved through the marriage of King James III to Princess Sobieski, which was greatly aided by letters the Pope wrote to the Emperor. Within a few months, it was clear that there was hope for an heir, and toward the end of 1720, as the birth approached, the Holy Father understood that it was crucial to make the legitimacy of the birth unquestionable. He realized that the Holy See must not contradict itself but must act in a way that clearly showed its protest against the unjust decree by recognizing the future child as the heir apparent and legitimate successor to the throne of England. He took it upon himself to ensure that the event was celebrated with the utmost solemnity. Therefore, at the Holy Father's request, the Sacred College, the Roman Senate, the highest Roman princes and prelates, and the leading nobility of Rome were present at the birth. Although there was a three-day delay before the birth took place, during that time, the ante-rooms of Her Majesty were filled with these highly respected individuals, who took turns keeping watch, while some Cardinals stayed up every night. Thus, in the presence of such an esteemed assembly, on December 31 of that year, Charles Edward, Prince of Wales, was born. He was acknowledged as such, and thus as the heir apparent to the Crown, by the Supreme Pontiff himself, who promptly had the birth announced to everyone by cannon fire from the castle. It is worth noting that, even if King James III had been peacefully on his throne, the newborn prince could not have received greater honors, nor could his right to succeed to the Crown have been proclaimed more definitely. The only formality that could have added a final touch would have been the traditional Delivery of the Swaddling Clothes, which was a custom only for the heirs of crowned heads (and then only those who reigned by succession, not by election). However, since Clement XI of pious memory died before this was concluded, it was left to his successor, Innocent XIII, to complete the formalities, which he did with the utmost solemnity, sending an ambassador with all the formality and ceremonies observed with other Courts.

From all this, it cannot be denied that the obligations under which the Royal House of Stuart lay to Clement XI. of blessed memory are very plainly shown, but it is also shown just as plainly how much His Holiness had at heart the dignity of the Holy See, and how well he realised the absolute necessity by which he was bound to sustain the rights of the aforesaid Royal House inviolable. The Holy Father saw plainly that all these repeated acts of recognition must necessarily greatly embitter the English Government against the Catholics, and, in consequence, must, in a manner, be an obstacle to the success of the missions. He also understood that he alone was the one Catholic prince who had made this act of recognition. With all this, keeping before his[Pg 446] eyes the justice of the cause (which was quite apart from the question of religion), the abhorrence that the Holy See could never sufficiently show to the aforementioned decree, and, finally, the strict obligation of his successors never to depart from the line he had taken towards a family which deserved so much from the Holy See, he did not hesitate for a moment to pursue this course with great solemnity, thereby robbing his successors of any reason of doubt concerning the treatment owed to the Prince of Wales on the death of his father; since His Holiness knew well, that once a son was recognised as heir-apparent by the Holy See, no doubt could be raised that at the death of his father he should succeed to everything, and therefore to his dignity and honours: in the same way that, in the Empire (notwithstanding its being an Elective State), once the Holy See recognised any one as King of the Romans, she could not afterwards, on the death of the Emperor, free herself from recognising his successor. The mind of the glorious Clement XI. was so full of these just sentiments, at the moment of his death, that he wished to show plainly to all the Sacred College how great was his anxiety that what he had done towards the Royal House should be permanently maintained, laying on them a special charge to that effect. All the succeeding Popes, beginning with Innocent XIII. down to Clement XIII., now by the grace of God reigning, have been most faithful and zealous executors of this trust, and all have treated and regarded the first-born son of James III. as Prince of Wales; therefore as successor to the King of England. Hence, ever since the Prince has been admitted to audiences with His Supreme Holiness, there has never been the slightest difficulty as to his treatment, or rather, there has been no doubt, that among other fitting distinctions, he should have, as did the king, his father, an armchair (which it is customary for the Holy See to offer to the heirs-apparent to a throne). But, in this one particular, His Majesty asked that a slight modification might be made in his presence, for the one and only reason of maintaining the custom of the Kingdom of England, where even the eldest son in the presence of his father is not allowed to sit in a seat equal to his: and to comply with His Majesty’s wish, the prince has always been given an easy chair, but without arms.

From all this, it’s clear that the obligations the Royal House of Stuart had to Clement XI. of blessed memory are evident. It’s also clear how much His Holiness valued the dignity of the Holy See and recognized the absolute necessity of protecting the rights of the Royal House. The Holy Father understood that these repeated acts of recognition would inevitably anger the English Government against Catholics, which could hinder the success of the missions. He realized he was the only Catholic prince to make this act of acknowledgment. Keeping in mind the justice of the cause (which was separate from religion), the disgust the Holy See felt towards the aforementioned decree, and his successors' strict obligation to uphold the position he had taken towards a family that had done so much for the Holy See, he did not hesitate for a moment to take this path with great solemnity. This decision clarified for his successors how they should treat the Prince of Wales after his father's death. The Holy See knew that once a son was recognized as the heir-apparent, there could be no doubt that he would inherit everything, including his dignity and honors. This is similar to the Empire, where once the Holy See acknowledged someone as King of the Romans, it could not later refuse to recognize his successor after the Emperor's death. At the time of his death, Clement XI. was so consumed with these just sentiments that he wanted to ensure all members of the Sacred College understood his desire for the Royal House’s recognition to be maintained, specifically charging them with this responsibility. All the succeeding Popes, from Innocent XIII. to the currently reigning Clement XIII., have faithfully executed this trust and treated the firstborn son of James III. as Prince of Wales, thus as the successor to the King of England. Since then, when the Prince has been granted audiences with His Supreme Holiness, there has been no trouble regarding his treatment. It has been clear that among other appropriate honors, he should receive an armchair (a customary offering from the Holy See to the heirs-apparent of a throne). However, His Majesty requested a slight adjustment regarding his presence due to the custom in the Kingdom of England, where even the eldest son is not permitted to sit in a seat equal to his father’s. To honor His Majesty’s wish, the prince has always been provided with a chair, but one without arms.

There now remains to examine the contradictions and inconsistencies which would arise each time that the Holy See refused to recognise the Prince of Wales as legitimate successor to the king, his father, at the death of the latter. These would be without doubt innumerable; it would not be easy to foresee them all, nevertheless we can mention some. Firstly, that as the Prince of Wales has for the space of forty-five years been in possession of the title and prerogatives of Prince of Wales, they cannot now be denied him, whether present or absent, without derogating and expressly contradicting the solemn line of action followed by six successive Popes. In the second place, it must follow that if the Holy See to-day treats and looks on this same person as Prince of Wales (that is to say, as natural successor to the throne of England, as is the Dauphin to that of France, and the Prince of the Asturias to that of Spain), and to-morrow hearing of the death of his father draw back from[Pg 447] recognising him as succeeding to that father in dignity and honours, she thus denies that he ever was Prince of Wales. In the third place, how could she then recognise the aforesaid Prince after his father’s death? Perhaps still as Prince of Wales? But it is averred that he is that no longer. Plainly then, either he is entitled to the same treatment as that given to his father, whom he has succeeded, or, it is only right to say that he has not been entitled all these years to the prerogatives and rights of heir. Fourthly, before the Pope could make an innovation of this nature, so entirely at variance with the course adopted by his predecessors, it would be necessary to have some very strong reason, which neither exists now, nor ever can exist. For, if any of the Catholic princes have been constrained to draw back from the recognition of the Royal House of Stuart, as legitimate successors and heirs to the throne of England, it has only been in consequence of their entering on different treaties of peace with the present Government of England, which has put them under the necessity of recognising the heretical succession, as established by the famous Act of Parliament. But no such cause can possibly affect the Holy Father in any way. He has never made nor can he make treaties of any sort with heretical Princes: neither has he ever taken part in the aforesaid treaties of peace of other princes. Above all, he never has recognised, nor can he ever recognise, as valid or real, this same famous Decree, against which, as has been shown above, the continued recognition of the Royal House of Stuart serves as an indisputable protest. And from this we come to the fifth serious inconsistency, which might be most prejudicial to the Holy See; for if the Pope should cease to recognise the Prince of Wales as successor to the king, his father, it is evident, even to his most humble admirers, that he would be, in a way, revoking all the protests made by his predecessors, and a very dangerous consequence might ensue: namely, that should the prince of any heretical state become a Catholic, it would be within the power of his subjects, for this one reason only, to deprive him of his rights and inheritances.

There are still contradictions and inconsistencies to consider each time the Holy See refuses to recognize the Prince of Wales as the legitimate successor to his father, the king, upon the latter's death. These inconsistencies would undoubtedly be numerous; it wouldn't be easy to anticipate all of them, but we can mention a few. First, the Prince of Wales has held the title and privileges of Prince of Wales for forty-five years, so it cannot now be denied to him, whether he is present or absent, without contradicting the established practice of six consecutive Popes. Second, if the Holy See today regards this individual as Prince of Wales (essentially, the natural successor to the throne of England, just as the Dauphin is to France and the Prince of Asturias is to Spain), and then tomorrow, upon hearing of his father's death, refuses to recognize him in that role, it essentially denies that he was ever the Prince of Wales. Third, how could the Holy See then acknowledge the aforementioned Prince after his father's death? Perhaps still as Prince of Wales? But then it is asserted that he is no longer that. Clearly, he must either be entitled to the same treatment as his father, whom he succeeds, or it’s fair to say that he hasn’t been entitled to the rights and privileges of an heir all these years. Fourth, before the Pope could introduce such a significant change—so contrary to the actions of his predecessors—there would need to be a strong reason, which neither exists now nor will ever exist. If any Catholic princes have been compelled to withdraw their recognition of the Royal House of Stuart as legitimate successors to the throne of England, it has only been due to their agreements with the current Government of England, which forced them to accept the heretical succession established by the well-known Act of Parliament. But no such reason can affect the Holy Father at all. He has never made nor can he make treaties of any kind with heretical princes: nor has he ever participated in the peace treaties of other princes. Above all, he has never recognized, nor can he ever recognize, this notorious Decree as valid or real, against which the ongoing recognition of the Royal House of Stuart stands as an undeniable protest. This leads us to the fifth serious inconsistency, which could be very harmful to the Holy See; if the Pope were to stop recognizing the Prince of Wales as the successor to the king, his father, it’s clear, even to his most loyal supporters, that he would effectively be rejecting all the protests made by his predecessors, and a very dangerous consequence might follow: that if a prince of any heretical state converted to Catholicism, it would be within the power of his subjects, for that one reason alone, to strip him of his rights and inheritances.

Sixthly, is it not easy to see the serious inconsistency that would arise in the Public Records, which, up till now, have, with the authority of the Holy See, been printed for so many years in the same manner? Under the heading of England should there then be inscribed the name of George III? But this is not possible, since he has never been, nor can be recognised by the Pope as king. Should there not rather be entered under the above heading—Charles Edward, Prince of Wales—Henry Benedict, Duke of York? But where is the father? If he is dead there is no longer a Prince of Wales, then this title does not belong to him. Either the title should be that of king, or it should be abolished, with that of England, as if it no longer existed.

Sixthly, isn’t it obvious how serious the inconsistency would be in the Public Records, which, until now, have been printed for so many years in the same way with the Holy See’s authority? Should the name George III be listed under the heading of England? But that’s not possible, since he has never been, nor can be, recognized by the Pope as king. Shouldn’t we instead list Charles Edward, Prince of Wales—Henry Benedict, Duke of York under that heading? But where is the father? If he’s dead, then there’s no longer a Prince of Wales, so this title doesn’t apply to him. Either the title should be that of king, or it should be eliminated along with that of England, as if it no longer existed.

It only remains then to examine whether in the circumstances in which the Holy See is now placed, the Papal recognition (as in the occasion of the death of King James III.) of the son who has been for so many years in possession of the titles and prerogatives of the Prince of Wales, as successor in dignity and honours, can, in any justice be called an innovation. He who writes appeals to the whole world, even to the enemies of the[Pg 448] Royal House, though even these he can hear declaring as with one voice that the innovation would rather be, that the Holy See should act to the contrary; it would be a self-contradiction, in that it would be showing approbation of that of which she does not approve, and further, it would be showing great hostility to the Royal House in return for its having sacrificed three kingdoms for the Holy Faith, in depriving it of the only refuge to which it can rightly turn, and in which it has trusted for so many years. And there is no Catholic prince who does not well understand how impossible it would be for the Pope to follow such a course. They know well that no prince is called upon to account for his doings to any one else, more particularly when they concern matters or principles relating to his own state. And indeed, notwithstanding that all the Catholic princes in a body have lately refused to recognise the King of Poland, and only the Pope, with two heretical princes have done so, the Catholic princes, have, in this action of the Holy Father found no cause of quarrel, or, if they have found any, they have been satisfied with the just remark, that the Pope is not obliged to give any reasons for his actions under any circumstances, and that, in this case, he has only followed the rules and principles of the Holy See, and lastly that it is sufficient for him that he is satisfied with the validity of the election, and of the treatment accorded to his ambassador, as representing his own person.

It only remains to consider whether, given the current situation of the Holy See, the Papal recognition (as was the case at the death of King James III.) of the son who has held the titles and privileges of the Prince of Wales for so many years as the rightful successor in dignity and honors can truly be considered an innovation. The writer calls upon the entire world, even the enemies of the [Pg 448] Royal House, who he can hear proclaiming in unison that the real innovation would be for the Holy See to act otherwise; that would be a contradiction, as it would imply approval of something she does not support. Moreover, it would demonstrate grave hostility toward the Royal House for having sacrificed three kingdoms for the Holy Faith, depriving it of the only refuge it can justifiably turn to and has relied on for so many years. No Catholic prince fails to understand how impossible it would be for the Pope to take such an approach. They are well aware that no prince is required to justify his actions to anyone else, particularly when those actions pertain to matters or principles related to his own realm. Indeed, even though all the Catholic princes have recently declined to acknowledge the King of Poland, with only the Pope and two heretical princes doing so, the Catholic princes have found no reason to dispute the Holy Father's actions. If they have found any reason, they resign themselves to the fair observation that the Pope is not obligated to provide explanations for his actions under any circumstances, and that, in this instance, he has merely adhered to the rules and principles of the Holy See; ultimately, it suffices for him that he is assured of the validity of the election and the treatment given to his ambassador as representing himself.

But in our case, this only strengthens the argument, in that the recognition of the King of Poland admitted of some inquiries and discussion, but what discussion or inquiry can be necessary in recognising the legitimate succession of a son to a father, after the death of the latter? In reality there is no comparison between the two cases, this last recognition being nothing new, but rather the necessary consequence of the understanding that was established years ago by the supreme Pontiffs, that they should recognise the son of James III.

But in our situation, this only reinforces the argument, since recognizing the King of Poland allowed for some questions and discussions, but what kind of discussion or inquiry is needed for acknowledging a son's legitimate succession to his father after the father's death? In reality, there's no comparison between the two situations; this last recognition isn't anything new, but rather a necessary outcome of the agreement made years ago by the supreme Pontiffs that they would recognize the son of James III.

And all the arguments that could be cited, in order that the Holy See should give herself a dispensation from now recognising the Prince of Wales as legitimate successor on the death of his father, might have been brought forward just as reasonably, and with greater force, to hinder Clement XI. of pious memory from recognising him as Prince of Wales, as he did with all ceremony, as has already been stated, being at that time the only Catholic prince who did so recognise him. And although the House of Hanover saw that this act constituted a promise from the Holy See, which it certainly did, to recognise the prince as legitimate successor of his father, after the death of the latter, this, notwithstanding, brought none of those evil effects (perhaps chimerical) which were feared by some people who were but ill-informed or little conversant with the state of affairs in the kingdom.

And all the arguments that could be made for the Holy See to grant a dispensation from recognizing the Prince of Wales as the legitimate successor following his father's death could have been presented just as reasonably, and even more convincingly, to prevent Clement XI. of blessed memory from acknowledging him as Prince of Wales, which he did with full ceremony, as has already been mentioned, being at that time the only Catholic prince to do so. And although the House of Hanover recognized that this act was a promise from the Holy See, which it certainly was, to acknowledge the prince as the legitimate successor of his father after the latter's death, this, however, did not result in any of the negative consequences (perhaps imagined) that some people feared due to their limited knowledge or understanding of the situation in the kingdom.

He who has written this Memorial would have it understood in conclusion, that he has no other aim in view than to remove scruples felt by some who know little of the affairs of the world, and to combat the difficulties that perhaps might be raised by enemies, not only of the Royal House, but of the Holy See. For the rest, there has ever been[Pg 449] such continual clemency and fatherly love shown by His Holiness, now by the grace of God reigning, towards the whole of the aforesaid Royal House that it is impossible to believe, on the death of King James III., that His Holiness will in any way depart from the most wise example set by his predecessors of glorious memory.

The person who wrote this Memorial wants to make it clear that his only goal is to address the concerns of those who don't know much about world events and to counter any problems that might be posed by opponents of both the Royal House and the Holy See. Furthermore, there has always been[Pg 449] such continuous kindness and fatherly love shown by His Holiness, who is currently reigning by the grace of God, towards the entire Royal House that it's hard to believe that after the death of King James III., His Holiness will stray from the wise example set by his honorable predecessors.

Note:—As, after the completion of this Memorial there were not lacking those who cast doubts on the sentiments of His Holiness, now by the grace of God reigning, towards the Royal House, suspecting that they differed from those of his predecessors, and who, therefore, might consider the lively confidence evinced by the writer in the latter part of this Memorial simply as an empty compliment towards His Holiness, this same writer has therefore considered it a strict act of justice, as well as a tribute of gratitude and respect, towards the Holy Father, to insert at the end of this Memorial any letters that bear upon the present resolution of the Royal Prince of Wales to return to this capital. And as the exact sentiments of the Holy Father towards the Royal House and the person of the said Prince of Wales have been shown more unquestionably clearly than the light of the sun, so the writer considers any further comments and explanations unnecessary, to show how unfounded and false these suspicions are, and with how much reason and foundation the writer has relied so surely on the sentiments of the Holy Father, and how well the Royal Prince of Wales has understood them, in that it is solely on the strength of the same, that he continues in his resolve to return to Rome.

Note:—After completing this Memorial, there were some who questioned the feelings of His Holiness, who now reigns by the grace of God, towards the Royal House, suspecting that they were different from those of his predecessors. These individuals might view the writer's strong confidence expressed in the latter part of this Memorial as simply an empty compliment to His Holiness. Therefore, the writer feels it is essential, both as an act of justice and as a sign of gratitude and respect towards the Holy Father, to include at the end of this Memorial any letters related to the current decision of the Royal Prince of Wales to return to this capital. The true feelings of the Holy Father towards the Royal House and the individual of the said Prince of Wales have been made as clear as day, so the writer believes that no further comments or explanations are necessary to demonstrate how baseless and false these suspicions are. It is evident that the writer has good reason to trust the sentiments of the Holy Father, and that the Royal Prince of Wales has understood them well, as it is solely based on this understanding that he remains determined to return to Rome.


APPENDIX VI
THE MACDONALDS

John, Lord of the Isles (died 1387), fourth in succession from Donald progenitor of the clan, had two wives: (1) Amy MacRuari; (2) the Princess Margaret, daughter of Robert II., to marry whom he repudiated or divorced Amy. The lordship of the Isles went to the descendants of the Princess. The hereditary clan chiefship, which ordinarily descends to the senior heir-male, did not necessarily follow the title. The lordship of the Isles was taken from the Macdonalds and annexed to the Crown in 1494, and the question who is supreme hereditary chief of Clan Donald has ever since been a matter of strife. Glengarry and Clanranald descend from Amy MacRuari, the first wife, and are therefore senior in blood, but it is doubtful which of these two families is the elder; last century the general preference was for Glengarry, but the new Scots Peerage and the Clan Donald historian favour Clanranald. Sleat and Keppoch descend from the Princess Margaret,[Pg 450] Sleat coming from Hugh, third son of Alexander, Lord of the Isles (died 1449), grandson of John, and son of Donald of Harlaw, while Keppoch comes from the fourth son of John and Princess Margaret, and could only have a claim if there were a flaw in the pedigree of Sleat. Doubts have been expressed of the legitimacy of Hugh of Sleat, but these have been set aside. Glencoe’s progenitor was Ian, son of Angus Og (died 1330), Bruce’s friend who fought at Bannockburn, the father of John, Lord of the Isles, mentioned above, but the Seannachies have pronounced him illegitimate. From this Ian the Glencoe clan has been known as MacIan for centuries.

John, Lord of the Isles (died 1387), the fourth in line from Donald, the founder of the clan, had two wives: (1) Amy MacRuari; (2) Princess Margaret, daughter of Robert II., whom he married after he separated from Amy. The lordship of the Isles was passed down to the descendants of the Princess. The hereditary clan chiefship, which usually goes to the senior male heir, did not necessarily go along with the title. The lordship of the Isles was taken from the Macdonalds and annexed to the Crown in 1494, and since then, the question of who is the supreme hereditary chief of Clan Donald has been a source of conflict. Glengarry and Clanranald are descendants of Amy MacRuari, the first wife, and are therefore senior by blood, but it remains uncertain which of the two families is the older; last century, the general preference leaned towards Glengarry, but the new Scots Peerage and the Clan Donald historian favor Clanranald. Sleat and Keppoch come from Princess Margaret, [Pg 450] with Sleat descending from Hugh, the third son of Alexander, Lord of the Isles (died 1449), grandson of John, and son of Donald of Harlaw, while Keppoch descends from the fourth son of John and Princess Margaret and could only claim if there were a flaw in Sleat's lineage. Doubts have been raised about the legitimacy of Hugh of Sleat, but those doubts have been dismissed. Glencoe’s ancestor was Ian, son of Angus Og (died 1330), a friend of Bruce who fought at Bannockburn, and the father of John, Lord of the Isles, mentioned earlier, but the Seannachies have deemed him illegitimate. From this Ian, the Glencoe clan has been known as MacIan for centuries.

It is interesting to know that in the summer of 1911, the three hereditary heads of the families having serious claims on the supreme chiefship of the clan, Glengarry, Clanranald, and Sleat (Sir Alexander of the Isles), signed an indenture mutually agreeing to cease from active assertion of their claims, and that in the event of more than one of them being present with the clan, precedence for the occasion would be decided by lot.

It's interesting to note that in the summer of 1911, the three hereditary leaders of the families with significant claims to the chief position of the clan—Glengarry, Clanranald, and Sleat (Sir Alexander of the Isles)—signed an agreement to stop actively asserting their claims. They also agreed that if more than one of them was present with the clan, who would take precedence would be decided by drawing lots.


[Pg 451]

[Pg 451]

APPENDIX VII
Genealogical tables showing the relationships between certain Highland chiefs and leaders in 1745.

[Pg 453]
Genealogical table
Note.—These tables have been compiled chiefly from the genealogical information given in the third volume of the History of Clan Donald.
Click here for a full-size version.


[Pg 454]

[Pg 454]

APPENDIX VIII
LISTS OF SOME HIGHLAND GENTLEMEN WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE FORTY-FIVE __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

MACDONALDS

McDonald's

Clanranald Branch

Clanranald Branch

  • Ranald of Clanranald, chief.[647]
  • Ranald, young Clanranald.
  • Æneas, br. of Kinlochmoidart.
  • Allan of Morar.
  • Allan, brother of Kinlochmoidart.
  • Alexander of Boisdale, Clanranald’s brother.[647]
  • Alexander of Glenaladale, major.
  • Alexander, brother of Dalelea.
  • Alexander, his son.
  • Angus of Borradale.
  • Angus of Dalelea.
  • Angus Maceachain, Borradale’s son-in-law (surg. in Glengarry’s regt.).
  • Donald, son of Clanranald.
  • Donald of Kinlochmoidart.
  • Hugh, bishop, br. of Morar.[647]
  • John of Guidale, br. of Morar.
  • James, uncle of Glenaladale.
  • James, br. of Kinlochmoidart.
  • John, son of Morar.
  • John, brother of Glenaladale.
  • John, son of Borradale. (Killed at Culloden.)
  • John (bis), son of Borradale (author of narrative, Lyon in Mourning, vol. iii. p. 375).
  • John, doctor, br. of Kinlochmoidart.
  • Neil Maceachain.
  • Ranald, son of Borradale.
  • Ranald of Belfinlay.
  • Ranald, brother of Kinlochmoidart.
  • Ranald, son of Morar.
  • Roderick, uncle of Glenaladale.

Glengarry Branch

Glengarry Library

  • John of Glengarry, chief.[647]
  • Alastair, young Glengarry.
  • Alexander of Ochtera.
  • Angus, son of Glengarry.
  • Angus, br. of Lochgarry.
  • Allan, brother of Leek.
  • Allan of Cullachie.
  • Archibald, youngest Barisdale.
  • Coll, young Barisdale.
  • Donald of Lochgarry.
  • Donald of Lundie.
  • Donald, his son.
  • Donald, young Scotus.
  • John, his brother.
  • John of Arnabea.
  • John of Leek.
  • Ranald, doctor, uncle of Glengarry.
  • Ranald of Shian.
  • Ranald, brother of Leek.
  • Ronald, nat. son of Barisdale.
  • Ranald, brother of Arnabea.
  • Donald Roy Macdonald, brother of Baleshare of the Sleat branch, served in Glengarry’s regt.

Keppoch Branch

Keppoch Branch

  • Alexander of Keppoch, chief.
  • Alex, of Dalchosnie, Atholl Brig.
  • Allan, his son.
  • Angus, natural son of Keppoch.
  • Archibald, br. of Keppoch, capt.
  • Archibald of Clianaig.
  • Donald, brother of Keppoch, major.
  • Donald of Tirnadrish, major.
  • Donald Glass, son of Bohuntin.
  • John, br. of Dalchosnie, Atholl Brig.
  • John Og, son of Bohuntin.
  • Ranald of Aberarder.

Glencoe Branch

Glencoe Branch

  • Alexander of Glencoe, chief.
  • James, his brother, captain.
  • Donald, his brother.
  • Donald, a Glencoe cadet (poet).
[Pg 455]

CAMERONS

CAMERONS

  • Donald Cameron of Lochiel, chief.
  • John, his father (retired chief).
  • Alexander of Dungallon, major.
  • Alexander, his son, standard-bearer.
  • Alexander of Druimnasaille.
  • Alexander, br. of Lochiel, priest.
  • Alexander of Glenevis.
  • Allan of Lundavra, lieut.
  • Allan of Callart, lieut.
  • Allan, brother of Glenevis.
  • Archibald, doctor, br. of Lochiel, A.D.C. to Prince Charles.
  • Donald of Erracht.
  • Donald of Glenpean.
  • Duncan, Fortingal, Epis. chaplain.
  • Duncan, Nine Mile Water.
  • Ewen of Inverlochy, capt.
  • Ewen of Dawnie, capt.
  • Ewen, uncle of Callart.
  • Ewen, brother of Druimnasaille.
  • Hugh of Annock.
  • James, ensign, k’ld at Prestonpans.
  • John, brother of Callart.
  • Ludovick of Torcastle.
  • Cameron of Arroch, capt.
  • —— of Clunes.
  • —— of Kinlochleven.
  • —— of Strone.
  • John, Presb. minister, Fortwilliam.

MACKENZIES

MACKENZIES

Lord Cromartie’s Regiment

Cromartie's Regiment

  • The Earl of Cromartie.
  • Lord Macleod, his son.
  • Colin Mackenzie, br. of Ballone, capt.
  • John of Ardloch, capt.
  • William, brother of Kilcoy, capt.
  • William, br. of Allangrange, capt.
  • Donald, Irnhavanny, capt.
  • Colin, Cullecuden, capt.
  • Donald, Fetterboy, capt.
  • John, Elgin, surgeon.
  • Alexander, br of Dundonald, lieut.
  • Roderick, br. of Keppoch, lieut.
  • Alexander of Corrie, lieut.
  • Hector Mackenzie, lieut.
  • Alexander, Miltown of Ord, lieut.
  • Alexander, Una Ross, lieut.
  • Alexander, Killend, ‘officer.’
  • Colin of Badluachrach, ‘officer.’

Barisdale’s Regiment

Barisdale's Regiment

  • Alex. Mackenzie of Lentron, major.
  • Kenneth and Colin, his brothers.
  • Kenneth, brother of Fairburn, a schoolboy, capt.[648]
  • John Mackenzie of Torridon was a nephew of Macdonell of Keppoch, and attached himself and his following to his uncle’s regiment.
[Pg 456]

MACLEODS

MACLEODS

  • Alexander, son of Muiravonside, A.D.C. to Prince Charles.
  • Donald of Bernera.
  • Donald of Gualtergil, Skye.
  • Malcolm of Raasa.
  • Malcolm, cousin of Raasa.
  • Murdoch, son of Raasa, surg.
  • John of Glendale.
  • Roderick, his brother.
  • Roderick of Cadboll.

MACKINNONS

Mackinnon's

  • John of Mackinnon, Skye, chief.
  • John, his nephew, Elgol, Skye.
  • John of Coriechattan.

MACLEANS

MACLEANS

  • Sir Hector of Duart, chief, major in Lord John Drummond’s French regiment; made prisoner in Edinburgh, 9th June ’45, and retained in custody throughout the campaign.
  • Allan, son of Calgary, Mull, lieut.
  • Allan, son of Drimnin, Morvern.
  • Charles of Drimnin, major.
  • Hugh, son of Kilmory, Mull, capt.
  • John, writer, Inverness.
  • John, brother of Kingairloch, capt.
  • Another brother of Kingairloch.
  • Lachlan, nat. son of Drimnin.

MACLACHLANS

MACLACHLANS

  • Lachlan of Maclachlan, chief.
  • Alexander, son of Corrie, capt.
  • Alex. tidewaiter, Fortwilliam, major.
  • Archibald, Maryburgh, ensign.
  • Dugald, Inversanda, capt.
  • James, Morvern, lieut.
  • Kenneth of Kilinachanich, adj.
  • Lachlan of Inishconel, capt.
  • John, Rev., Epis. chaplain.

FRASERS

FRASERS

  • Simon, Lord Fraser of Lovat.
  • Simon, Master of Lovat.
  • Alexander of Fairfield, major.
  • Alexander, Stratherrick.
  • Alexander, son of Relich, capt.
  • Alexander, Leadchune.
  • Alexander of Balchreggan, capt.
  • Alexander, br. of Culduthel, capt.
  • Donald, Moy, capt.
  • Charles, yr. of Fairfield, adj.-gen.
  • Charles, yr. of Inverallochy, lt.-col.
  • Hugh, son of Fraserdale, capt.
  • Hugh of Leadclune.
  • Hugh, Mirton.
  • Hugh, Inverness, adj.
  • Hugh, Dorburn, Borlum.
  • Hugh, Littlegarth.
  • James of Foyers, lt.-col.
  • John, son of Moydie.
  • John, yr. of Bochruben.
  • John of Bruaich.
  • John, Kilmorach, ensign.
  • John, Byrefield, capt.
  • John, Rossie, Kincardine.
  • Simon, Dalhaple, capt.
  • Simon of Achnacloich, capt.
  • Simon of Auchnadonch, capt.
  • Simon, vintner, ‘officer.’
  • Thomas of Gortuleg.
  • William, yr. of Culbockie, capt.
  • William of Culmiln, capt.
  • William, Fort Augustus, capt.
  • William of Dalernig.
[Pg 457]

MACPHERSONS

MACPHERSONS

  • Ewen of Cluny, chief.
  • Alexander, Kingussie.
  • Alexander, Blanchybeg.
  • Andrew, son of Benachar, capt.
  • Angus, Flichaty.
  • Donald of Breackachy, capt.
  • Donald, Ruthven, Badenoch.
  • Ewen, Laggan of Nood.
  • Ewen, Dalwhinny, lieut.-col.
  • Hugh, Coraldy.
  • John, Cluny.
  • John, Pitachran.
  • John, Garvamore, capt.
  • John of Strathmashie.
  • Kenneth, Ruthven, Badenoch.
  • Lachlan, yr. of Strathmashie.
  • Lewis, Delrady, major.
  • Malcolm (Dow), Ballachroan.
  • Malcolm of Phoyness, capt.
  • William, Ruthven.

MACINTOSHES

Macs

  • Lady Mackintosh of Mackintosh.
  • Alex. Macgillivray of Dunmaglas, lieut.-col.
  • Gillise Macbain of Dalmagarrie, maj.
  • Alexander Mackintosh, Elrig, capt.
  • Angus Mackintosh of Farr, capt.
  • Angus of Issich.
  • Duncan, Drummond.
  • Lachlan, Inverness, lieut.-col.
  • Simon, Daviot.

FARQUHARSONS

Farquharsons

  • Alex., Lintrethan, capt. (Ogilvy’s).
  • Charles, Drumnopark, Glenmuick, ensign.
  • Cosmus, junior, of Tombea.
  • Donald of Auchriachan, capt.
  • Francis of Monaltrie, colonel.
  • Francis, Bogg, Tarland, ensign.
  • Henry of Whitehouse, capt.
  • James of Balmoral, lieut.-col.
  • John of Altery, capt.
  • John, Lintrethan, lieut. (Ogilvy’s).
  • John of Aldlerg.
  • John, Bogg, Tarland, ensign.
  • Robert, Tullick, Glenmuick, ens.
  • Robert, Mill of Auchriachan, ens.
  • William of Broughderg, captain (Ogilvy’s).
  • William, Mill of Auchriachan, ens.
  • Farquharsons of Inverey, names not found.

For the Stewarts of Appin, see A List of Persons concerned in the Rebellion, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. viii. p. 383.

For the Stewarts of Appin, see A List of Persons involved in the Rebellion, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. viii. p. 383.

For the Grants of Urquhart and Glenmoriston, see Urquhart and Glenmoriston, by William Mackay, Inverness, 1893.

For the Funding of Urquhart and Glenmoriston, see Urquhart and Glenmoriston, by William Mackay, Inverness, 1893.

For The Gordons, see The House of Gordon (vol. iii., ‘Gordons under Arms’), by J. M. Bulloch, New Spalding Club, 1912.

For The Gordons, see The House of Gordon (vol. iii., ‘Gordons under Arms’), by J. M. Bulloch, New Spalding Club, 1912.

For the Atholl Regiments, see vol. iii. of Chronicles of the Atholl and Tullibardine Families, by the Duke of Atholl, Edinburgh, privately printed, 1896.

For the Atholl Regiments, see vol. iii. of Chronicles of the Atholl and Tullibardine Families, by the Duke of Atholl, Edinburgh, privately printed, 1896.


FOOTNOTES:

[1] In this narrative, unless otherwise indicated, events occurring in Great Britain are given in old style dates, those on the Continent in new style.

[1] In this story, unless stated otherwise, dates for events in Great Britain are presented in the old style, while dates for events on the Continent are in the new style.

[2] Original information on the Scots Plot is to be found in The Life of Lord Lovat written by Himself, London, 1797; A Collection of Original Papers about the Scots Plot, London, 1704; Original Papers, ed. by Jas. Macpherson, London, 1775; Major Fraser’s Manuscript, ed. by Alex. Fergusson, Edinburgh, 1889; The Lockhart Papers, London, 1817; and an eclectic account in Hill Burton’s Life of Lovat, London, 1847. Extracts from many of the original authorities on this and subsequent incidents are given usefully and ingeniously in consecutive narrative form by Professor Sanford Terry in The Chevalier de St. George, London, 1901.

[2] You can find the original information on the Scots Plot in The Life of Lord Lovat written by Himself, London, 1797; A Collection of Original Papers about the Scots Plot, London, 1704; Original Papers, edited by Jas. Macpherson, London, 1775; Major Fraser’s Manuscript, edited by Alex. Fergusson, Edinburgh, 1889; The Lockhart Papers, London, 1817; and a mixed account in Hill Burton’s Life of Lovat, London, 1847. Extracts from many of the original sources on this and later incidents are presented helpfully and cleverly in chronological narrative form by Professor Sanford Terry in The Chevalier de St. George, London, 1901.

[3] Original information: Histoire des Revolutions d’Ecosse et d’Irlande: The Hague, 1758, of which there is a Dublin reprint of 1761; The Secret History of Colonel Hooke’s Negotiations in Scotland in 1707, of which there are London, Edinburgh and Dublin editions, all of 1760 (it is practically a translation of the Histoire des Revolutions); The Correspondence of Colonel Nathaniel Hooke, an exhaustive work edited by Rev. W. D. Macray: Roxburghe Club, 1870. A not very friendly account of Hooke’s mission is given in the Lockhart Papers. The military state of Scotland at the time is to be found in An Account of the late Scotch Invasion as it was opened by My lord Haversham in the House of Lords: London, 1709. The story of the naval expedition is given in Mémoires du Comte de Forbin (Amsterdam, 1730), of which there is an English translation; the third edition is dated London, 1740.

[3] Original information: History of the Revolutions in Scotland and Ireland: The Hague, 1758, with a Dublin reprint from 1761; The Secret History of Colonel Hooke’s Negotiations in Scotland in 1707, available in London, Edinburgh, and Dublin editions, all from 1760 (essentially a translation of the History of the Revolutions); The Correspondence of Colonel Nathaniel Hooke, a comprehensive work edited by Rev. W. D. Macray: Roxburghe Club, 1870. A rather unsympathetic account of Hooke’s mission can be found in the Lockhart Papers. The military situation in Scotland during that period is detailed in An Account of the Late Scotch Invasion as Presented by My Lord Haversham in the House of Lords: London, 1709. The narrative of the naval expedition is provided in Mémoires du Comte de Forbin (Amsterdam, 1730), which also has an English translation; the third edition is dated London, 1740.

[4] The possibility of treachery was suggested by Hooke, and his story is to be found in a Gask MS. Hooke, who had been bred to the sea, found the steersman going on the wrong course. He was put right, but as soon as Hooke’s back was turned he went wrong again. See Jacobite Lairds of Gask, p. 15: London, 1870.

[4] Hooke hinted at the chance of betrayal, and his account can be found in a manuscript from Gask. Having grown up around the sea, Hooke noticed the steersman was heading off course. He corrected him, but as soon as Hooke looked away, the steersman strayed again. See Jacobite Lairds of Gask, p. 15: London, 1870.

[5] Esmond, bk. III. chap. i.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Esmond, vol. III. ch. 1.

[6] The authorities on the ’Fifteen are to be found noted in most standard histories.

[6] You can find the experts on the 'Fifteen mentioned in most standard histories.

[7] This statement bears the authority of a MS. in the Bibliothèque Nationale, and a casual reference in a letter of Bishop Atterbury’s. (See Martin Haile, James Francis Edward, the Old Chevalier: London, 1907, p. 210.)

[7] This statement is backed by a manuscript in the Bibliothèque Nationale and a brief mention in a letter from Bishop Atterbury. (See Martin Haile, James Francis Edward, the Old Chevalier: London, 1907, p. 210.)

[8] A full account from the original authorities of Clementina’s rescue and marriage is to be found in Narratives of the Detention, Liberation, and Marriage of Maria Clementina Stuart, edited by J. T. Gilbert, LL.D.: Dublin, 1894.

[8] You can find a complete account from the original sources about Clementina’s rescue and marriage in Narratives of the Detention, Liberation, and Marriage of Maria Clementina Stuart, edited by J. T. Gilbert, LL.D.: Dublin, 1894.

[9] Clementina, by A. E. W. Mason.

[9] Clementina, by A. E. W. Mason.

[10] The best account of this expedition is in Mr. W. K. Dickson’s exceedingly clear and exhaustive introduction to The Jacobite Attempt, Scottish History Society, vol. xix.: Edinburgh, 1895. All the original authorities for this incident and the preceding Swedish plot are indicated in the Notes.

[10] The most detailed description of this expedition can be found in Mr. W. K. Dickson’s very clear and comprehensive introduction to The Jacobite Attempt, Scottish History Society, vol. xix.: Edinburgh, 1895. All the original sources for this event and the earlier Swedish plot are listed in the Notes.

[11] Original authorities: Life of Christopher Layer: Norwich, 1723; Howell’s State Trials, vol. xvi. A full account is given by Lord Mahon, History of England, chap. xii. The dispositions by the Court at Rome are to be found in James Francis Edward, M. Haile; and The King over the Water (London, 1907), A. Shield and Andrew Lang.

[11] Original authorities: Life of Christopher Layer: Norwich, 1723; Howell’s State Trials, vol. xvi. A complete account is provided by Lord Mahon, History of England, chap. xii. The decisions made by the Court in Rome can be found in James Francis Edward, M. Haile; and The King over the Water (London, 1907), A. Shield and Andrew Lang.

[12] Hon. Arthur Dillon, second surviving son of Theobald, seventh Viscount Dillon. Born at Roscommon, 1670. His father raised a regiment for James II. at the Revolution, which Arthur accompanied to France, where he became its colonel, 1690. Served in Spain, Germany, and Italy. Lieut.-General under the Duke of Berwick at Barcelona, 1714. Created viscount (Jacobite) in the peerage of Ireland, 1717. Created earl (Jacobite) in the peerage of Scotland, 1721. Made Knight of the Thistle, 1722. Died at Paris, 1733.—Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage.

[12] Hon. Arthur Dillon, the second surviving son of Theobald, seventh Viscount Dillon. Born in Roscommon, 1670. His father raised a regiment for James II. during the Revolution, which Arthur joined in France, where he became its colonel in 1690. He served in Spain, Germany, and Italy. He was a Lieutenant-General under the Duke of Berwick at Barcelona in 1714. He was made a viscount (Jacobite) in the peerage of Ireland in 1717. He was created an earl (Jacobite) in the peerage of Scotland in 1721. He became a Knight of the Thistle in 1722. He died in Paris in 1733.—Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage.

[13] Shield and Lang, The King over the Water, pp. 360, 363.

[13] Shield and Lang, The King over the Water, pp. 360, 363.

[14] Mahon, History of England, chap. xii.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mahon, *History of England*, ch. 12.

[15] Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage, p. 16.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ruvigny, *Jacobite Peerage*, p. 16.

[16] It is worthy of note that although the new Scots Peerage as a rule chronicles the Jacobite titles conferred on Scottish nobles, there is no mention of this peerage to Sir James Grant in that work (see Scots Peerage, vol. vii. pp. 480-483), nor is it referred to in his biography in the Grant family history (Sir W. Fraser, The Chiefs of Grant, vol. i. pp. 371-392). For the action of the Grants in the ’Forty-five, see infra, p. 269 et seq.

[16] It's important to point out that while the new Scots Peerage generally chronicles the Jacobite titles given to Scottish nobles, there’s no mention of the peerage for Sir James Grant in that work (see Scots Peerage, vol. vii. pp. 480-483), nor is it referenced in his biography in the Grant family history (Sir W. Fraser, The Chiefs of Grant, vol. i. pp. 371-392). For information on the actions of the Grants in the ’Forty-five, see infra, p. 269 et seq.

[17] The Lockhart Papers are the principal authority for Jacobite history in Scotland from 1702 to 1728.

[17] The Lockhart Papers are the main source for Jacobite history in Scotland from 1702 to 1728.

[18] James Urquhart was the only son of Jonathan Urquhart of Cromarty and his wife Lady Jean Graham, daughter of the second Marquis of Montrose. Jonathan was the last of the Urquharts who owned the estate of Cromarty, famous owing to its possession by Sir Thomas Urquhart, the translator of Rabelais. Jonathan’s affairs having got into disorder, he sold his ancestral property to George Mackenzie, Viscount Tarbat, who was created Earl of Cromartie in 1703. James Urquhart married Anne Rollo, daughter of Robert Rollo of Powhouse, and had an only child, Grizel, who died unmarried. Colonel Urquhart ‘was a man of noble spirit, great honour, and integrity; he served in the wars both in Spain and Flanders with great reputation, but left the Army, and lived a retired life.... In him ended the whole male line of John, only son of the first marriage of John, tutor of Cromarty ... the representation devolved upon William Urquhart of Meldrum’ (Douglas, Baronage). Colonel Urquhart was born in 1691, and died on January 3rd, 1741 (Family papers). His appointment as Jacobite Agent for Scotland is dated May 28th, 1736 (Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage, p. 234).

[18] James Urquhart was the only son of Jonathan Urquhart from Cromarty and his wife Lady Jean Graham, the daughter of the second Marquis of Montrose. Jonathan was the last of the Urquharts to own the Cromarty estate, which was famous for being held by Sir Thomas Urquhart, the translator of Rabelais. After Jonathan's financial troubles, he sold the family property to George Mackenzie, Viscount Tarbat, who was made Earl of Cromartie in 1703. James Urquhart married Anne Rollo, the daughter of Robert Rollo of Powhouse, and they had one child, Grizel, who died unmarried. Colonel Urquhart was known for his noble spirit, great honor, and integrity; he fought in wars in both Spain and Flanders with an excellent reputation, but later left the army to live a quiet life.... With him ended the entire male line of John, the only son from the first marriage of John, tutor of Cromarty ... the representation then passed to William Urquhart of Meldrum' (Douglas, Baronage). Colonel Urquhart was born in 1691 and passed away on January 3rd, 1741 (Family papers). His appointment as Jacobite Agent for Scotland is dated May 28th, 1736 (Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage, p. 234).

[19] Not the famous conqueror of Almanza, who was killed in the War of the Polish Succession when besieging Philipsburg, on June 28th, 1734, but his son, known until then as the Duke of Liria.

[19] Not the famous conqueror of Almanza, who was killed in the War of the Polish Succession while laying siege to Philipsburg on June 28th, 1734, but his son, who until then was known as the Duke of Liria.

[20] His commission as colonel is dated October 22nd, 1715.—Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage, p. 244.

[20] His appointment as colonel is dated October 22, 1715.—Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage, p. 244.

[21] For general information about Gordon of Glenbucket, the reader is referred to Mr. J. M. Bulloch’s monumental work, The House of Gordon (New Spalding Club, Aberdeen, 1912). For Glenbucket’s character and his actions in 1745, see infra, p. 113 et seq. It is remarkable how the designation ‘of Glenbucket’ has adhered to the family for generations, although the land from which it was derived was parted with a hundred and seventy-nine years ago. Gordon’s descendants are still tenants of the farm of St. Bridget’s, in Glenlivet, which was old Glenbucket’s home in 1745, and are still termed ‘Glenbucket’ in the district. For the Macdonell marriages see the genealogies in History of Clan Donald, vol. iii.

[21] For general information about Gordon of Glenbucket, the reader can check out Mr. J. M. Bulloch’s significant work, The House of Gordon (New Spalding Club, Aberdeen, 1912). For details on Glenbucket’s character and his actions in 1745, see infra, p. 113 et seq. It's remarkable how the title ‘of Glenbucket’ has stuck with the family for generations, even though the land it comes from was sold off one hundred seventy-nine years ago. Gordon’s descendants still farm St. Bridget’s in Glenlivet, which was old Glenbucket’s home in 1745, and they are still referred to as ‘Glenbucket’ in the area. For the Macdonell marriages, refer to the genealogies in History of Clan Donald, vol. iii.

[22] M. Haile, James Francis Edward, p. 367.

[22] M. Haile, James Francis Edward, p. 367.

[23] French historians generally blame Fleury for his timidity, and ascribe to him the decline of the splendid French navy, which he allowed to fall into decay for fear of English jealousy.

[23] French historians usually criticize Fleury for his lack of boldness and blame him for the decline of the impressive French navy, which he permitted to deteriorate out of fear of provoking English envy.

[24] The commission is dated January 28th, 1738. See Stuart Papers in Browne’s History of the Highlands, vol. iv. p. 21.

[24] The commission is dated January 28, 1738. See Stuart Papers in Browne’s History of the Highlands, vol. iv. p. 21.

[25] See infra, p. 25.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See below, p. 25.

[26] The terms of this message are given from a state paper in the French Archives of which the following is an extract: ‘il manda en Angleterre que le zèle de ses sujets écossais était si vif, qu’il lui semblait qu’on pourrait opposer les Montagnards de ce pays à la plupart des troupes que le gouvernement avait alors sur pied, et qu’il y aurait lieu de tout espérer même sans secours étranger, pourvu que les Anglais affidés prissent de leur côté de justes mesures.’ See Colin, Louis XV. et les Jacobites, p. 1.

[26] The content of this message comes from a state document in the French Archives, of which the following is an excerpt: ‘He wrote to England that the enthusiasm of his Scottish subjects was so strong that he believed they could take on most of the troops that the government had at the time, and that there was reason to hope for success even without foreign assistance, provided that the loyal English took the right measures on their end.’ See Colin, Louis XV. et les Jacobites, p. 1.

[27] For Sempill’s descent and claim to the title, see Appendix, p. 421.

[27] For Sempill’s fall and assertion of the title, see Appendix, p. 421.

[28] See infra, p. 21.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See below, p. 21.

[29] See infra, p. 25.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See below, p. 25.

[30] A. G. M. Macgregor, History of the Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 358.

[30] A. G. M. Macgregor, History of the Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 358.

[31] Of the Associators only three were ‘out’ in the ’Forty-five: the Duke of Perth, Lovat, and Lochiel. Lord John Drummond, who was brother-in-law of Traquair, remained inactive. Prince Charles spent the night of February 2nd, 1746, at his house, Fairnton, now Ferntower, near Crieff. Lord Traquair remained in England; he was arrested at Great Stoughton in Huntingdonshire, on July 29th, 1746, and committed to the Tower; but was released without trial before August 1748. Traquair’s brother, John Stuart, married in 1740 and retired from the Concert then. Sir James Campbell was too old for action. Macgregor of Balhaldies was in Paris during the campaign.

[31] Among the Associators, only three were ‘out’ in the 'Forty-five: the Duke of Perth, Lovat, and Lochiel. Lord John Drummond, who was Traquair's brother-in-law, stayed inactive. Prince Charles spent the night of February 2nd, 1746, at his house, Fairnton, now called Ferntower, near Crieff. Lord Traquair stayed in England; he was arrested in Great Stoughton, Huntingdonshire, on July 29th, 1746, and taken to the Tower, but was released without a trial before August 1748. Traquair's brother, John Stuart, got married in 1740 and retired from the Concert then. Sir James Campbell was too old for action. Macgregor of Balhaldies was in Paris during the campaign.

[32] The name ‘Macgregor’ was then proscribed, and all members of the clan had to adopt another name; that adopted by Balhaldy’s branch was ‘Drummond.’ Balhaldy’s father, Alexander, was a man of some consequence. He had been a trader about Stirling, and made some money, and he married a daughter of Sir Ewen Cameron of Lochiel, his son Balhaldy being thus a first cousin of Lochiel of the ’45. In 1714 the Clan Gregor being chiefless, certain of its leading members elected Alexander to be hereditary chief. (A. G. M. Macgregor, Hist. of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 270.) He was created a Scots baronet by the Chevalier in 1740, and he died at Balhaldie House, Dunblane, in 1749. His son, William, was born in 1698. Though never in Scotland after 1743 he was attainted in 1746, and specially exempted from the act of indemnity of 1747. He married Janet, daughter of Laurence Oliphant of Gask, at Paris in January 1758. He died near Paris in 1765.

[32] The name ‘Macgregor’ was then banned, and all members of the clan had to take on a different name; Balhaldy’s branch chose ‘Drummond.’ Balhaldy’s father, Alexander, was a significant figure. He had been a trader in Stirling, made a good amount of money, and married a daughter of Sir Ewen Cameron of Lochiel, making his son Balhaldy a first cousin of Lochiel from the ’45. In 1714, since the Clan Gregor had no chief, some of its leading members elected Alexander to be the hereditary chief. (A. G. M. Macgregor, Hist. of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 270.) He was appointed a Scots baronet by the Chevalier in 1740, and he passed away at Balhaldie House, Dunblane, in 1749. His son, William, was born in 1698. Although he was never in Scotland after 1743, he was disqualified in 1746 and specifically excluded from the act of indemnity of 1747. He married Janet, the daughter of Laurence Oliphant of Gask, in Paris in January 1758. He died near Paris in 1765.

[33] The designation Balhaldy is spelt variously in contemporary documents, Bohaldy, Bochaldie, Bahady, etc. Cf. R. L. Stevenson’s Catriona, last chapter.

[33] The name Balhaldy is spelled in different ways in modern documents, like Bohaldy, Bochaldie, Bahady, etc. See R. L. Stevenson’s Catriona, last chapter.

[34] War was declared with Spain, October 19th, 1739.

[34] War was declared against Spain on October 19, 1739.

[35] Abridged from a State Paper in the French archives, of which portions are printed in Capitaine J. Colin’s Louis XV. et les Jacobites: Paris, 1901.

[35] Abridged from a State Paper in the French archives, with parts printed in Captain J. Colin’s Louis XV. and the Jacobites: Paris, 1901.

[36] The Emperor Charles VI. died on October 20th, 1740, and France interfered in the War of the Austrian Succession the following August.

[36] Emperor Charles VI. passed away on October 20, 1740, and France got involved in the War of the Austrian Succession the next August.

[37] Colin, p. 7.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colin, p. 7.

[38] A. G. M. Macgregor, Hist. of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 359.

[38] A. G. M. Macgregor, Hist. of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 359.

[39] Colin, p. 8.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colin, p. 8.

[40] Lord Marischal wrote to the Chevalier in June 1740, telling him that the King of Spain had refused an audience to the Duke of Ormonde on this account. Mahon, Hist. of England, 3rd ed., vol. iii. App. p. iv.

[40] Lord Marischal wrote to the Chevalier in June 1740, letting him know that the King of Spain had denied the Duke of Ormonde an audience for this reason. Mahon, Hist. of England, 3rd ed., vol. iii. App. p. iv.

[41] Se infra, pp. 12, 22.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See below, pp. 12, 22.

[42] ‘Le roi très chrétien, touché du zèle des Ecossais, était porté à leur accorder les secours dont ils avaient besoin: qu’en conséquence, Sa Majesté voulait bien faire transporter dans ce royaume toutes les troupes irlandaises qui étaitent à son service, avec les armes et munitions et les 20,000 livres sterling qu’on demandait pour aider les montagnards à se mettre en campagne’ (Colin, p. 8).

[42] ‘The very Christian king, inspired by the zeal of the Scots, was inclined to provide them with the support they needed: therefore, His Majesty agreed to send all the Irish troops serving him, along with weapons and munitions and the £20,000 requested to help the highlanders take to the field’ (Colin, p. 8).

[43] This document is printed by the special permission of the French Government. The original signed and sealed with seven seals is preserved in the National Archives in Paris.

[43] This document is printed with special permission from the French Government. The original, signed and sealed with seven seals, is kept in the National Archives in Paris.

[44] It was very disappointing to find that no trace of this list of Highland chiefs referred to could be discovered.

[44] It was really disappointing to find that no evidence of this list of Highland chiefs mentioned could be found.

[45] Balhaldy’s Memorial, History of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 359.

[45] Balhaldy’s Memorial, History of Clan Gregor, vol. ii. p. 359.

[46] See Appendix, p. 422.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Appendix, p. 422.

[47] He died on January 29th (18th O.S.).

[47] He passed away on January 29th (18th O.S.).

[48] That Fleury had proposed something is most probable. He had for some time been complaining of the ‘insults’—what to-day we call pin-pricks—with which the British Government had been annoying France in a time of peace. These pin-pricks culminated in June 1742 when a British army under Lord Stair landed in the Netherlands, with the intention of thwarting the French in their campaign against Austria.

[48] It's very likely that Fleury suggested something. He had been expressing his frustration with the "insults"—what we would now refer to as pin-pricks—that the British Government had been using to irritate France during a time of peace. These pin-pricks peaked in June 1742 when a British army led by Lord Stair landed in the Netherlands, aiming to undermine the French efforts in their campaign against Austria.

[49] Infra, p. 16 n.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Infra, p. 16 n.

[50] ‘Il n’y a pas grand inconvénient que le ministre voie que le rempart de la mer ne met pas entièrement l’Angleterre à couvert des enterprises de la France.’

[50] "There's not much harm in the minister seeing that the sea wall doesn't completely protect England from France's actions."

[51] Colin, p. 35.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colin, p. 35.

[52] Infra, pp. 41, 42.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Infra, pp. 41, 42.

[53] Memorials, pp. 93, 428.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memorials, pp. 93, 428.

[54] The Affairs of Scotland, 1744-46, by Lord Elcho. Edited by Hon. Evan Charteris: Edinburgh, 1907, p. 63. Lord Elcho gives a list of members of the club who undertook to join the Prince in any event.

[54] The Affairs of Scotland, 1744-46, by Lord Elcho. Edited by Hon. Evan Charteris: Edinburgh, 1907, p. 63. Lord Elcho provides a list of club members who committed to supporting the Prince no matter what.

[55] Memorials, p. 64.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memorials, p. 64.

[56] Anxious to learn the sources of this information, I wrote to the author of the volume to inquire, and received a courteous letter informing me that these statements were made on the authority of the Stuart Papers.

[56] Eager to find out where this information came from, I reached out to the author of the book to ask, and I got a polite response letting me know that these statements were based on the Stuart Papers.

[57] Memorials, p. 444.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memorials, p. 444.

[58] Infra, p. 116.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Infra, p. 116.

[59] Trial of Lord Lovat, p. 36.

[59] Trial of Lord Lovat, p. 36.

[60] Memorials, p. 50.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memorials, p. 50.

[61] Life of the Duke of Cumberland: London, 1766, p. 242.

[61] Life of the Duke of Cumberland: London, 1766, p. 242.

[62] Lord Macleod wrote a Narrative of the campaign, including the march to Thurso. It is printed in Sir Wm. Fraser’s Earls of Cromartie, vol. ii. pp. 379 et seq.

[62] Lord Macleod wrote an account of the campaign, including the march to Thurso. It is printed in Sir Wm. Fraser’s Earls of Cromartie, vol. ii. pp. 379 et seq.

[63] P. 123.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Pg. 123.

[64] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 155.

[64] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 155.

[65] Family information.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Family details.

[66] See The Earl of Aberdeen, by the Hon. A. Gordon, p. 4: London, 1893.

[66] See The Earl of Aberdeen, by the Hon. A. Gordon, p. 4: London, 1893.

[67] Cumin of Kininmont, Gordon of Cobairdie, and Erskine of Pittodrie.

[67] Cumin of Kininmont, Gordon of Cobairdie, and Erskine of Pittodrie.

[68] See Blackwood’s Magazine for May 1829.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Blackwood’s Magazine for May 1829.

[69] Scottish Historical Review, vol. v. p. 288.

[69] Scottish Historical Review, vol. 5, p. 288.

[70] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 152.

[70] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 152.

[71] Spalding Club Misc., vol. i. p. 403.

[71] Spalding Club Misc., vol. i. p. 403.

[72] Ibid., p. 406.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same source, p. 406.

[73] Compare p. 189.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See p. 189.

[74] MS. Order Book in Editor’s possession. The story is told with considerable fulness in Henderson’s Life of Cumberland (p. 239), where the schoolmaster’s name is given as Macaty, and where the blame of the sentence is ascribed to Hawley. The punishment was five hundred lashes at each of the cantonments.

[74] MS. Order Book in Editor’s possession. The story is detailed in Henderson’s Life of Cumberland (p. 239), where the schoolmaster is identified as Macaty, and the responsibility for the sentence is attributed to Hawley. The punishment was five hundred lashes at each of the cantonments.

[75] In a biographical appendix to his Life of Colonel Gardiner who was killed at Prestonpans. (London, 1747.)

[75] In a biographical appendix to his Life of Colonel Gardiner, who died at Prestonpans. (London, 1747.)

[76] Original correspondence on the relations between the Prince and Lord George Murray, together with references to contemporary authorities on the battle of Culloden, will be found in the Itinerary of Prince Charles Edward, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxiii., 1897.

[76] Original correspondence on the relationships between the Prince and Lord George Murray, along with references to contemporary sources about the battle of Culloden, can be found in the Itinerary of Prince Charles Edward, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxiii., 1897.

[77] Scottish History Society, vol. xxiii.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Scottish History Society, vol. 23.

[78] For Flora Macdonald’s relationships, see Genealogical Table, p. 452.

[78] For Flora Macdonald’s relationships, see Genealogical Table, p. 452.

[79] See Lyon in Mourning, vol. i p. 176.

[79] See Lyon in Mourning, vol. i p. 176.

[80] Ibid., vol. ii. p. 100.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ibid., vol. 2, p. 100.

[81] Cf. infra, p. 372 n. 2.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See below, p. 372 n. 2.

[82] Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ruvigny, Jacobite Peerage.

[83] This letter, dated Kinlochiel, August 22nd, arrived after Sir James Grant went to London, and was forwarded to him. He sent it unopened to Lord Tweeddale, Secretary for Scotland. The letter is preserved in the Tweeddale Archives.

[83] This letter, dated Kinlochiel, August 22nd, arrived after Sir James Grant went to London, and was forwarded to him. He sent it unopened to Lord Tweeddale, Secretary for Scotland. The letter is preserved in the Tweeddale Archives.

[84] Urquhart and Glenmoriston: Inverness, 1893.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Urquhart and Glenmoriston: Inverness, 1893.

[85] P. 271.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ p. 271.

[86] Pp. 275-276.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ pp. 275-276.

[87] Pp. 292-294.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Pp. 292-294.

[88] Pp. 307-309.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ pp. 307-309.

[89] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 267.

[89] Chiefs of Grant, vol. ii. p. 267.

[90] High Court Index Book No. 1.

[90] High Court Index Book No. 1.

[91] Scots Magazine, vol. ix. pp. 246, 247.

[91] Scots Magazine, vol. 9, pp. 246, 247.

[92] The name in the original documents is spelt sometimes with one s and sometimes with one t, sometimes with one or both these letters doubled; occasionally he is called ‘Grosert.’ In modern times the name is spelt Grosett by Miss Collins, a descendant of Walter. In the new Scots Peerage it is spelt Grosset, vol. i. p. 495.

[92] The name in the original documents is spelled sometimes with one "s" and sometimes with one "t," and at times with one or both of these letters doubled; occasionally he is referred to as "Grosert." Nowadays, the name is spelled Grosett by Miss Collins, a descendant of Walter. In the new Scots Peerage, it is spelled Grosset, vol. i. p. 495.

[93] Newcastle Papers, British Museum, Add. MS. 32710, f. 491.

[93] Newcastle Papers, British Museum, Add. MS. 32710, f. 491.

[94] Record Office, State Papers Dom., George II., Bundle 98.

[94] Record Office, State Papers Dom., George II., Bundle 98.

[95] Newcastle Papers, previously quoted.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Newcastle Papers, quoted earlier.

[96] Family Papers.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Family Documents.

[97] See pp. 336 and 402. Grossett’s statement, corroborated by Fawkener and Sharpe, is elaborated in the Newcastle Papers quoted above. ‘He performed his duties at great hazard to his life. The Rebells robbed and plundered his house at Alloa and his house in the country [Logie] to such a degree that they did not leave his infant children even a shirt to shift them, and pursued his wife and daughter to an uncle’s house, to whose estate they knew Mr. Grosett was to succeed, plundered that house [Bredisholm, near Coatbridge], stript his wife and daughter of the very clothes they had upon their backs and used them otherwise in a most cruel and barbarous manner.’

[97] See pp. 336 and 402. Grossett’s statement, supported by Fawkener and Sharpe, is detailed in the Newcastle Papers mentioned above. ‘He carried out his duties at great risk to his life. The Rebels robbed and looted his home in Alloa and his house in the countryside [Logie] to the extent that they left his infant children without even a shirt to wear, and chased his wife and daughter to an uncle’s house, knowing that Mr. Grossett was set to inherit the estate. They ransacked that house [Bredisholm, near Coatbridge], stripped his wife and daughter of the very clothes they were wearing, and treated them in a most cruel and barbaric way.’

[98] Scots Magazine, vol. vii. p. 538.

[98] Scots Magazine, vol. 7, p. 538.

[99] Record Office, State Papers Dom., George II., bundle 91.

[99] Record Office, State Papers Dom., George II., bundle 91.

[100] This is one of the very rarest of Jacobite pamphlets. There is a long account of the harsh proceedings of the Edinburgh magistrates towards Robert Drummond, the Jacobite printer who published the poem, in Hugo Arnot’s History of Edinburgh, 1778, book III. chap. iv. See also Book of the Old Edinburgh Club, vol. viii., in which the poem is reprinted for the first time.

[100] This is one of the rarest Jacobite pamphlets. There's a detailed account of the severe actions taken by the Edinburgh magistrates against Robert Drummond, the Jacobite printer who published the poem, found in Hugo Arnot’s History of Edinburgh, 1778, book III. chap. iv. Also, check out the Book of the Old Edinburgh Club, vol. viii., where the poem is reprinted for the first time.

[101] Mr. J. R. N. Macphail, K.C., has sent me a copy of Accusations laid against Grossett in December 1747. These are nine in number: he is accused (1) Of keeping an open trade at Alloa for smugglers ‘particularly in the tobacco way.’ (2) Of secreting the public revenue for a tract of years and of vitiating and forging the accounts. (3) Of granting land permits for wine to smugglers all over the kingdom. (4) Of arranging false prices with merchants who purchased at roup goods seized from smugglers. (5) Of suborning evidence even to perjury in connection with the sale of goods taken from the Rebels. (6) Of being an accomplice of smugglers in trade and profits. (7) Of passing goods after seizure and of accepting a bribe. (8) Of mutilating the books of the public office. (9) Of fraud, circumvention and oppression in many different cases.

[101] Mr. J. R. N. Macphail, K.C., has sent me a copy of the accusations made against Grossett in December 1747. There are nine of them: he is accused (1) of running an open trade in Alloa for smugglers, especially involving tobacco. (2) Of hiding public revenue for several years and tampering with and forging the accounts. (3) Of issuing land permits for wine to smugglers across the kingdom. (4) Of colluding with merchants to set false prices for goods seized from smugglers. (5) Of influencing witnesses, even to the point of perjury, related to the sale of goods taken from the Rebels. (6) Of being an accomplice to smugglers in trade and profits. (7) Of allowing goods to be sold after being seized and accepting a bribe. (8) Of tampering with the records of the public office. (9) Of committing fraud, deception, and oppression in many various instances.

[102] Scots Peerage, vol. i. p. 495.

[102] Scots Peerage, vol. 1, p. 495.

[103] The Jacobite accounts of this incident will be found in Jacobite Memoirs, p. 47; in Maxwell of Kirkconnell’s Narrative, p. 94; and in Sir William Fraser’s The Earls of Cromartie, vol. ii. p. 390.

[103] You can find the Jacobite accounts of this incident in Jacobite Memoirs, p. 47; in Maxwell of Kirkconnell’s Narrative, p. 94; and in Sir William Fraser’s The Earls of Cromartie, vol. ii. p. 390.

[104] Home, History of the Rebellion, ch. viii.

[104] Home, History of the Rebellion, ch. viii.

[105] See Appendix, Cardinal York’s Memorial.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Appendix, Cardinal York’s Memorial.

[106] Lyon in Mourning, vol. iii. p. 232.

[106] Lyon in Mourning, vol. iii. p. 232.

[107] Lent to me by Lumisden’s great-grand-niece, Mrs. G. E. Forbes, Edinburgh.

[107] Lent to me by Lumisden’s great-grandniece, Mrs. G. E. Forbes, Edinburgh.

[108] The winter of 1741-42.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Winter 1741-42.

[109] Charles (Stuart), 5th Earl of Traquair; succeeded 1741; died 1764.

[109] Charles (Stuart), 5th Earl of Traquair; took over in 1741; passed away in 1764.

[110] See Appendix.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Check Appendix.

[111] William Macgregor or Drummond of Balhaldy.

[111] William Macgregor or Drummond of Balhaldy.

[112] James Edgar, secretary to the Chevalier de St. George. A younger son of David Edgar of Keithock, Forfarshire. Entered the Chevalier’s service as secretary 1716, and held that office for forty-seven years. Became Secretary of State in October 1763, and died 24th September 1764, predeceasing his master by fifteen months.

[112] James Edgar, secretary to the Chevalier de St. George. A younger son of David Edgar of Keithock, Forfarshire. He started working as the Chevalier’s secretary in 1716 and held that position for forty-seven years. He became Secretary of State in October 1763 and passed away on September 24, 1764, dying fifteen months before his master.

[113] Cardinal André Hercule de Fleury. Born 1653; became French prime minister in 1726; died in January 1743.

[113] Cardinal André Hercule de Fleury. Born 1653; became French prime minister in 1726; died in January 1743.

[114] Donald Cameron, 19th of Lochiel, ‘the Gentle Lochiel’ of the ’45. He succeeded his grandfather as chief of the Camerons in 1719, his father John (who died 1748) having transferred his rights to his son. Donald Cameron died in France, 1748.

[114] Donald Cameron, 19th of Lochiel, ‘the Gentle Lochiel’ of the ’45. He took over as chief of the Camerons in 1719 after his grandfather, as his father John (who passed away in 1748) had passed down his rights to him. Donald Cameron died in France in 1748.

[115] Sir James Campbell of Auchenbreck, 5th Baronet; died 1756; father-in-law of Donald Cameron of Lochiel. His wife was Janet, daughter of John Macleod of Macleod, and aunt of Norman Macleod the chief in 1745.

[115] Sir James Campbell of Auchenbreck, 5th Baronet; died 1756; father-in-law of Donald Cameron of Lochiel. His wife was Janet, daughter of John Macleod of Macleod, and aunt of Norman Macleod, the chief in 1745.

[116] Charles (Douglas), 3rd Duke; born 1698; succeeded 1711; died 1778.

[116] Charles (Douglas), 3rd Duke; born in 1698; took over in 1711; died in 1778.

[117] William (Douglas), 3rd Earl of March; succeeded his cousin as 4th Duke of Queensberry; died unmarried 1810. The ‘Old Q’ of George III.’s reign.

[117] William (Douglas), 3rd Earl of March; took over from his cousin as the 4th Duke of Queensberry; died single in 1810. The ‘Old Q’ during the reign of George III.

[118] George (Keith), 10th and last Earl Marischal; born 1694; succeeded 1712. Joined Lord Mar in 1715, and commanded the right wing of the Jacobite army at Sheriffmuir. Forfeited and attainted. Participated in the Spanish Invasion of 1719. See Dickson, The Jacobite Attempt of 1719, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xix. In 1744 was residing near Boulogne. Took no part in 1745. Entered service of Frederick the Great. Pardoned by George II., 1759; died at Potsdam, unmarried, 1778.

[118] George (Keith), 10th and final Earl Marischal; born 1694; succeeded in 1712. Joined Lord Mar in 1715 and commanded the right wing of the Jacobite army at Sheriffmuir. He was forfeited and attainted. He took part in the Spanish Invasion of 1719. See Dickson, The Jacobite Attempt of 1719, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xix. In 1744, he was living near Boulogne. He did not participate in 1745. He joined the service of Frederick the Great. Pardoned by George II., 1759; died in Potsdam, unmarried, 1778.

[119] James Keith, brother of the 10th Earl Marischal; born 1696. Attainted for participation in the ’15. Entered the Spanish army, and in 1728 the Russian army with the rank of major-general. Although an attainted Jacobite, he visited London in 1740, and was received by George II. as a Russian general (Scots Mag., vol. ii. p. 43). In 1747 entered service of Frederick the Great as field-marshal. Killed at the battle of Hochkirchen 1758.

[119] James Keith, brother of the 10th Earl Marischal; born 1696. Disqualified for involvement in the '15. Joined the Spanish army, and in 1728 the Russian army as a major-general. Despite being a disqualified Jacobite, he visited London in 1740 and was welcomed by George II. as a Russian general (Scots Mag., vol. ii. p. 43). In 1747, he joined Frederick the Great's service as a field-marshal. Killed in the battle of Hochkirchen in 1758.

[120] And likewise to settle a correspondence with Scotland the manner in which we had formerly conveyed Letters being very precarious and at the same time so much suspected that the Government had caused search the Ships in which the Letters generally came, but by good fortune their happened none to be aboard that time.

[120] Similarly, to establish a communication with Scotland, the way we had previously sent letters was quite unreliable and heavily scrutinized. The government had arranged searches of the ships that usually carried the letters, but fortunately, none were found on board at that time.

[121] Æneas Macdonald, a banker in Paris, fourth son of Ranald Macdonald third of Kinlochmoidart. Accompanied Prince Charles to Scotland. Surrendered in 1746. Condemned to death but pardoned on condition of residing out of the United Kingdom. Was killed in France during the Revolution.

[121] Aeneas Macdonald, a banker in Paris and the fourth son of Ranald Macdonald, the third of Kinlochmoidart. He went to Scotland with Prince Charles. He surrendered in 1746. He was sentenced to death but was pardoned on the condition that he live outside the United Kingdom. He was killed in France during the Revolution.

[122] Amelot de Chaillou. French foreign minister, 1737 to 1744.

[122] Amelot de Chaillou. French foreign minister, 1737 to 1744.

[123] Katharine Darnley, half-sister of the Chevalier; daughter of James II., by Katherine Sedley. Born 1682; died 1743. Third wife of John Sheffield, 1st Duke of Buckingham, who died 1721.

[123] Katharine Darnley, the half-sister of the Chevalier; daughter of James II., with Katherine Sedley. Born in 1682; passed away in 1743. She was the third wife of John Sheffield, the 1st Duke of Buckingham, who died in 1721.

[124] Colonel William Cecil. Long the Jacobite agent in England. Relationship uncertain. In a memorandum in the French Foreign Office he is called ‘oncle de Lord Salisbury.’ Was apprehended in 1744. His deposition, in which he denies all knowledge of a plot, is given in Fitzroy Bell’s Murray’s Memorials, p. 408.

[124] Colonel William Cecil. He was a long-time Jacobite agent in England. The nature of his relationship is unclear. In a memo from the French Foreign Office, he is referred to as ‘uncle of Lord Salisbury.’ He was arrested in 1744. His statement, where he claims to know nothing about a plot, is included in Fitzroy Bell’s Murray’s Memorials, p. 408.

[125] Secretary of the Duchess of Buckingham.

[125] Secretary of the Duchess of Buckingham.

[126] Charles Smith, a merchant or banker in Boulogne. His wife, daughter of Sir Hugh Paterson of Bannockburn (Prince Charles’s host when besieging Stirling Castle in January 1746), was aunt to Clementina Walkenshaw. Their son married the heiress of Seton of Touch. The ceremony was performed by Mr. William Harper of Edinburgh at Linlithgow on the day of the battle of Prestonpans. Charles Smith, who had come to Scotland for the event, posted out from Edinburgh bearing the news of the victory to the Jacobite congregation.—Ingram, A Jacobite Stronghold of the Church, p. 47.

[126] Charles Smith, a merchant or banker in Boulogne. His wife, the daughter of Sir Hugh Paterson of Bannockburn (who hosted Prince Charles during the siege of Stirling Castle in January 1746), was the aunt of Clementina Walkenshaw. Their son married the heiress of Seton of Touch. The ceremony was conducted by Mr. William Harper of Edinburgh at Linlithgow on the day of the battle of Prestonpans. Charles Smith, who had traveled to Scotland for the occasion, rushed out from Edinburgh to deliver the news of the victory to the Jacobite congregation.—Ingram, A Jacobite Stronghold of the Church, p. 47.

[127] I daresay the Cardinal never shed a tear on that Account nor indeed allowing his concern to be never so great I think it reasonable to believe so great a minister would act the part of a Child.

[127] I doubt the Cardinal ever cried about that. Even if he was really concerned, I think it's fair to assume such a high-ranking official would act childishly.

[128] If he had so mean an Opinion of these folks and their memorials were so rediculous as they are represented he must either have been quite doated and consequently not capable to understand anything otherwise it would have been no difficult matter to make him sensible of the absurdity of their proposals.

[128] If he thought so lowly of these people and their memorials were as ridiculous as they are portrayed, he must have been completely foolish and therefore unable to understand anything. Otherwise, it wouldn't have been hard to show him how absurd their suggestions were.

[129] Maréchal de Maillebois, a great-nephew of Colbert; commander-in-chief in the War of the Austrian Succession.

[129] Maréchal de Maillebois, a great-nephew of Colbert; commander-in-chief in the War of the Austrian Succession.

[130] If this was the cause of his death I must be of the Opinion of a great many that he was then become an old woman and incapable of any enterprise that required Courage and Activity, and indeed all the world with these two Gentlemen themselves owned him to be of a very frightened timorous Disposition.

[130] If this was what caused his death, I must agree with many others that he had become like an old woman, unable to take on any tasks that required bravery and energy. In fact, everyone, including these two gentlemen, acknowledged that he had a very fearful and timid nature.

[131] It was at this Time Mr. Drummond told me the Story of the Sweedish Troops and the Discoveries of it made by the Queen of Spain, which I shall relate at large afterwards. (See post, p. 22.)

[131] It was at this moment that Mr. Drummond shared with me the story of the Swedish troops and the discoveries made by the Queen of Spain, which I will elaborate on later. (See post, p. 22.)

[132] This thought was the least reason could assign to Mr. Amalot for my coming over, as I could not tell him it was owing to a letter we had received from Mr. D[rummond], which I have repented of since, for I told him if he was instructed by the Cardinal, as they said, he certainly would have let me see that these Gentlemen had no reason to give such encouragements, which would have at once shewed them in their True Light. This Mr. Drummond and Lord Semple insisted I should say to excite the French to Action and I then did not think it any great crime to use them as they had often done us by imposing upon them.

[132] This thought was the least reason I could give Mr. Amalot for my visit, since I couldn't tell him it was because of a letter we had received from Mr. Drummond, which I’ve since regretted. I told him that if the Cardinal had instructed him, as they claimed, then he would have shown me that these gentlemen had no real reason to give such encouragement, which would have revealed their true nature right away. Mr. Drummond and Lord Semple insisted that I should say this to motivate the French to take action, and at the time, I didn’t think it was such a big deal to use them as they had often used us by misleading them.

[133] I shall leave it to the Reader to determine how far this answer of Mr. Amelot agrees with what Mr. D[rummond] advances in his Letter and if it be at all reasonable to imagine that the Cardinal had resolved upon an Invasion when the person he had employed in this affair had never read the Memorial given in concerning it nor even understood the manner in which it was concerted and carried on in Scotland and again whether or not Lord Semple had succeeded as he braged in preventing much delay by perswading the Cardinal to make Mr. Amelot privy to the whole affair.

[133] I’ll leave it to the reader to decide how well Mr. Amelot's answer aligns with what Mr. D[rummond] states in his letter, and whether it's reasonable to think that the Cardinal had planned an invasion when the person he hired for this matter had never read the related memorial or fully grasped how it was organized and executed in Scotland. Additionally, I wonder if Lord Semple truly succeeded, as he claimed, in reducing delays by convincing the Cardinal to inform Mr. Amelot about everything.

[134] I mentioned before that the King had ordered a Sum not exceeding £900 Ster yearly to be payed to Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] provided money could be raised he had hitherto gott no more than £200 Lord T[ra]q[uai]r had payed him so I was instructed to know why it was not answered as promised, which I accordingly did, when Mr. Drummond said he thought it very odd that the people in Scotland could not give him that small pension when Lord T[ra]q[uai]r had offered Lord Semple credit for £1,000 the year before when in London. I told him people had little money to spare and that since the Gentlemen was in a manner starving I would write to the King about it as directed, upon which he said in a passion I had better not do it for it would hurt them in the King’s Eyes as it must look bad that people who profered doing so much could not advance such a trifle, and I remember he said the King would not fail to look upon them as tamperers which I never did mention to them looking upon it as the heat of passion. He then said as he had all along made it his Business to advance their Interest and Honour, he would fall upon a method of raising a sum of money to the Value of 5 or 6,000£ upon a bond payable at the Restoration with six per cent. of Interest and that D[uke of] P[erth] L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r L[ochie]l and I should bind for it and that he would even endeavour to gett an equall sum for D[uke of] P[erth] on L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s particular Use upon the same Conditions. As I then did not know my man I went on to what he proposed and did not write to the King about it, neither did I till after I found out the double fetch he had in it, he at this time was applying to have a Pension settled upon himself which my writing in behalf of Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] would certainly have prevented as the King had ordered him to stay at home in the view of receiving the forementioned Sum, then his proposing to raise this sum for the D[uke] of P[erth]’s use was a means to encourage him to advance him £100, which he desired I would tell his Grace he would draw upon him at my leaving London, which he accordingly gott.

[134] I mentioned earlier that the King had ordered a payment not exceeding £900 a year to be given to Sir J[ames] C[ampbell], provided the funds could be raised. So far, he had only received £200, which Lord T[ra]q[uai]r had paid him. I was instructed to find out why the promised payment hadn't been made, which I did. Mr. Drummond remarked that it seemed strange that the people in Scotland couldn't provide him with such a small pension when Lord T[ra]q[uai]r had offered Lord Semple credit for £1,000 the previous year while in London. I told him that people had little money to spare, and since the gentleman was practically starving, I would write to the King about it as instructed. He then said angrily that I should think twice about doing that because it would make them look bad in the King's eyes, suggesting that it would reflect poorly that those who promised so much couldn't deliver such a small amount. I remember he said the King wouldn't hesitate to see them as meddling, which I never mentioned to them, considering it just a moment of anger. He then said that since he had always made it his business to promote their interests and honor, he would find a way to raise a sum of money worth £5,000 or £6,000 through a bond payable upon the Restoration with six percent interest, and that D[uke of] P[erth], L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r, L[ochie]l, and I would guarantee it. He also said he would even try to get an equal sum for D[uke of] P[erth] specifically for Lord T[ra]q[uai]r's needs under the same conditions. At that time, I didn’t know his true intentions, so I went along with his proposal and didn’t write to the King about it until after I realized his ulterior motives. At that moment, he was trying to secure a pension for himself, which my writing on behalf of Sir J[ames] C[ampbell] would have definitely hindered since the King had instructed him to stay at home with the expectation of receiving the aforementioned sum. Therefore, his suggestion to raise this money for the D[uke] of P[erth]'s use was a way to encourage him to lend him £100, which he asked me to inform his Grace about before I left London, and indeed, he got it.

[135] During all the time I was at London after my return from Paris I keept it secret from Coll. Cicel and Mr. Smith that I had ever been there, and gave it out that I had been in Kent making a visit to one Doctor Rutton, an old fellow student at Leyden, so upon the footing of my not knowing anything that was passing I told Coll. Cicel in Conversation upon my return to Scotland the King’s friends would inquire of me if I had not been to waite of him and what news I had gott so begg to know what I should say, he told me he at that time could say nothing positively but if the French did not do something soon the affairs of England in particular and Europe in general stood in such a way that in three moneth time he would order affairs so as to call the King over with his own attendance only this Vaunt was so rediculous that I had great difficulty to keep my Countinance and gave me a very low Opinion of every other thing he said.

[135] During my entire time in London after returning from Paris, I kept it a secret from Colonel Cicel and Mr. Smith that I had ever been there. I claimed I had been in Kent visiting an old fellow student from Leyden, Dr. Rutton. So, since I wasn’t aware of what was happening, I told Colonel Cicel during our conversation when I got back to Scotland that the King’s friends would ask me if I hadn’t been to wait on him and what news I had. I begged to know what I should say. He told me that at that moment he couldn’t say anything for sure, but if the French didn’t act soon, the situation in England and Europe in general was such that in three months' time he would arrange things to bring the King over, with only his own attendants. This boast was so ridiculous that I had a hard time keeping a straight face, which gave me a very low opinion of everything else he said.

[136] One evening after I had waited an hour in L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s lodgings at Edinburgh till such time as he should come in to talk with me about his journey to London he told me he understood that I was no friend to Bishop Keith, and upon asking what ground he had to think so, he told me that one Mr. Gordon, a Roman Catholick Bishop, had informed him of it, it seems Bishop Keith was of his acquaintance had been complaining to him that I had not represented him in a favourable Light. By which I conjectured that Keith had been applying that way to be named Bishop of Edinburgh for how should L[ord] J[ohn] Drummond have acquainted Lady Clanronald of Mr. Rattrae’s being named, which was a thing entirely foreign to both him and her if Keith had not been endeavouring to procure that preferment through the interest of the Roman Catholicks,[649] and Lord Drummond did write to Lady Clanronald that I had procured an order for Bishop Rattrae’s Election is certain, for it was by her means quite well known in Edinburgh before I came back from London and Lord T[ra]q[uai]r assured me from Bishop Gordon that L[ord] J[ohn] had wrote it to Lady Clanranald.

[136] One evening after I had waited an hour at L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r’s place in Edinburgh for him to come in to discuss his trip to London, he mentioned that he had heard I wasn’t a supporter of Bishop Keith. When I asked him what made him think that, he told me that a Mr. Gordon, a Roman Catholic bishop, had informed him. It turns out Bishop Keith knew him and had been complaining that I hadn’t represented him positively. This led me to suspect that Keith had been trying to get himself named Bishop of Edinburgh, since how else could L[ord] J[ohn] Drummond have informed Lady Clanronald about Mr. Rattrae’s appointment? That was completely unrelated to either of them unless Keith had been seeking that position through the backing of the Roman Catholics. [649] It is certain that Lord Drummond wrote to Lady Clanronald stating that I had arranged for Bishop Rattrae’s election, as it was fairly well known in Edinburgh before I returned from London, and L[ord] T[ra]q[uai]r confirmed to me that Bishop Gordon had told him that L[ord] J[ohn] had indeed sent that information to Lady Clanronald.

[137] My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r made all the dispatch possible to settle his affairs at home, being sensible how necessary it was for him to be att London and sett out from his own house on the sixth of Aprile.

[137] My Lord T[ra]q[uai]r acted quickly to wrap up his business at home, realizing how important it was for him to be in London and leave his house on April 6th.

[138] For this ecclesiastical episode in Murray’s career, see Appendix.

[138] For this church-related part of Murray’s career, see Appendix.

[139] Thomas Rattray, D.D., laird of Craighall-Rattray, Perthshire. Born 1684; consecrated bishop at large, 1727; afterwards Bishop of Brechin, and subsequently of Dunkeld; Primus, 1739; died 1743.

[139] Thomas Rattray, D.D., landowner of Craighall-Rattray, Perthshire. Born in 1684; became a bishop at large in 1727; later served as Bishop of Brechin, and afterward of Dunkeld; Primus in 1739; died in 1743.

[140] See Introduction, p. xxiii.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Introduction, p. 23.

[141] Thomas Cochrane; 6th earl; died 1737.

[141] Thomas Cochrane; 6th earl; passed away in 1737.

[142] Robert Freebairn, consecrated bishop at large, 1722; Primus, 1731; Bishop of Edinburgh, 1733; died 1739.

[142] Robert Freebairn, appointed as a bishop at large in 1722; Primus in 1731; Bishop of Edinburgh in 1733; passed away in 1739.

[143] Drumelzier, a Peebleshire estate adjoining Broughton. The proprietor was then Alexander Hay of Drumelzier, and Whittinghame, East Lothian (the latter now the property of Rt. Hon. A. J. Balfour); a grandson of the 1st Earl of Tweeddale, ancestor of the Hays of Duns: born 1701; died 1789. He and his brother William were both Jacobites.

[143] Drumelzier, a Peebleshire estate next to Broughton. The owner at that time was Alexander Hay of Drumelzier and Whittinghame, East Lothian (the latter now owned by Rt. Hon. A. J. Balfour); he was a grandson of the 1st Earl of Tweeddale, the ancestor of the Hays of Duns: born in 1701; died in 1789. He and his brother William were both Jacobites.

[144] I think there can be little doubt that this is the draft of the lost letter searched for in vain by Mr. Fitzroy Bell at Windsor (Murray’s Memorials, p. 50 n), and referred to by Mr. Lang (History of Scotland, iv. 441).

[144] I think there's little doubt that this is the draft of the lost letter that Mr. Fitzroy Bell searched for in vain at Windsor (Murray’s Memorials, p. 50 n), and that Mr. Lang mentioned (History of Scotland, iv. 441).

[145] As Traquair left on April 6th (see ante, p. 17 and post, p. 23) this letter was probably written in that month. Narsom is a cipher name for John Murray.

[145] As Traquair left on April 6th (see ante, p. 17 and post, p. 23) this letter was likely written that month. Narsom is a code name for John Murray.

[146] Robert Keith, kinsman and tutor of the 10th Earl Marischal and his brother: born 1681; consecrated bishop at large, 1727; Bishop of Orkney, Caithness and the Isles, 1731; Superintendent of Fife, 1733; succeeded Rattray as Primus, 1743; died 1757. Author of a History of Scotland, and of the well-known Catalogue of Scottish Bishops.

[146] Robert Keith, relative and tutor of the 10th Earl Marischal and his brother: born in 1681; consecrated bishop at large in 1727; appointed Bishop of Orkney, Caithness, and the Isles in 1731; became Superintendent of Fife in 1733; succeeded Rattray as Primus in 1743; passed away in 1757. He wrote a History of Scotland and the famous Catalogue of Scottish Bishops.

[147] James (Barry), 4th Earl of Barrymore. Born 1667; died 1747. An ardent Jacobite, who sent his son to join the French army when the invasion of 1744 was expected.

[147] James (Barry), 4th Earl of Barrymore. Born 1667; died 1747. A passionate supporter of the Jacobite cause, he sent his son to enlist in the French army when the invasion of 1744 was anticipated.

[148] French minister in London.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ French minister in London.

[149] It wont be amiss to insert here the Story mentioned before about the design of sending over some Swedish Troops which my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r mentioned to me on his return from London the last time he went up. Mr. Drummond told me at Paris as an Instance of the sincere intention the Cardinal had to serve the King, that he was sensible of the great hatred the English bore to the French and for that reason proposed to the Spanish Ambassador at Paris, Campo Florido, that provided his master would take 10,000 Swedes into his pay he would endeavour to procure them by the means of some of the chief nobility, the King[650] not being to be trusted on that head as he was looked upon as friends to the Family of Hanover and would take care to have them transported, that the Spanish Ambassador immediately wrote to his Master who sent back an answer Willing to pay the Troops but upon some condition which I now cannot charge my memory with, this the Cardinal took highly amiss and told him that his Master was not to bargain with in such cases, upon which the Spanish Ambassador immediately dispatched a Courier, but before the return of it their was a paragraph in the Amsterdam Gazette telling that the King of Spain and some of his Ministers were carrying on a scheme of great consequence but being known by the Queen was prevented. It seems as he said the Queen had been informed of it by some of the Ministers and judging that should it be putt in execution it would necessarily putt an end to war with England that she was very fond of and to putt a stop to it she putt in that paragraph in the Amsterdam Gazette to the Cardinal which had its object for their was not any more mention made of it.

[149] It wouldn't be out of place to share the story mentioned earlier about the plan to send over some Swedish troops, which my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r brought up during his last trip to London. Mr. Drummond told me in Paris that, as an example of the Cardinal's genuine intention to support the King, he recognized the deep resentment the English had towards the French. For that reason, he suggested to the Spanish Ambassador in Paris, Campo Florido, that if his master would agree to pay for 10,000 Swedes, he would try to arrange it through some of the main nobility, since the King[650] couldn’t be trusted in this matter due to his ties to the Hanover family, and he would ensure their transport. The Spanish Ambassador immediately wrote to his master, who replied that he was willing to fund the troops but with certain conditions I can’t recall at the moment. The Cardinal found this very upsetting and told him that his master shouldn’t be negotiating in such situations. In response, the Spanish Ambassador promptly sent a courier, but before it returned, there was a notice in the Amsterdam Gazette stating that the King of Spain and some of his ministers were involved in a significant scheme, but it was thwarted when the Queen found out. Apparently, she learned about it from some ministers and feared that if it went ahead, it would inevitably end the war with England, which she was very fond of. To put a stop to it, she had that paragraph included in the Amsterdam Gazette regarding the Cardinal, which achieved its purpose, as no further mention was made of it.

[150] It was no great wonder then I was deceived of his Lordship having not the least reason to suspect, and he a little shy cunning fellow on all occasions professing an attachment to nothing but truth and most disinterested loyalty.

[150] It was no big surprise that I was fooled by his Lordship since I had no reason to be suspicious, and he always acted like a shy, sly guy who claimed to care about nothing but honesty and pure loyalty.

[151] This must have proceded from wrong information for since that time they have made considerable levys and everybody agrees their are not above ten or eleven thousand in the Island.

[151] This must have come from incorrect information because since then they have made significant efforts, and everyone agrees there are no more than ten or eleven thousand on the Island.

[152] i.e. George II.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ i.e. George II.

[153] This was in the year 1737. If Gordon of Glenbucket went over to Rome, so far as ever I could learn without having any authority from the Gentlemen in the Highlands, unless it was from his son-in-law Glengary and General Gordon,[651] praying the King to come to Scotland that all were ready to rise in arms; but His Majesty was too wise to give in to such a rash and inconsiderate a project and sent over Captain Will Hay[652] to have the Opinion of his friends by which he might judge how far what Glenbucket had said was to be credited. Mr. Hay sent for me then in Holland and insisted upon my coming which I did, but I believe found few people of Glenbucket’s Opinion save the late Lord Kinmore[653] who I went to the Country and brought to toun to see him; but the case was now greatly altered as all the World were becoming sensible of; that the Interest of Great Britain must ever be sacrificed to that of Hanover as long as this family continued upon the Throne; that Parliamentary Schemes were nothing but Chimerical, together with the few Troops that were left in the Island and the distance they were then from the Coast which prevented their coming in time before the Country was reduced; as likewise the miserable prospect of the Country being ruined by the vast standing Army that would necessarily follow upon a peace as the Levys during the War would be considerable and no prospect of a reduction after their Return but rather a Certainty of their being continued; this seeming the fairest opportunity to bring us under a military Government. These and many other reasons made L[ochie]l be of Opinion that now was the time to strike a bold stroke for the King, and by Sir A[lexander] M[acdonald]’s letter to the Duke of P[erth], it would seem these reasons did influence him and were sufficient Grounds for the proposal.

[153] This was in the year 1737. From what I could gather without having any confirmed information from the gentlemen in the Highlands, aside from his son-in-law Glengarry and General Gordon, if Gordon of Glenbucket went over to Rome, they were urging the King to come to Scotland, claiming everyone was ready to take up arms. However, His Majesty was too wise to fall for such a reckless and thoughtless plan and sent Captain Will Hay [652] to gather the opinions of his friends to determine how credible Glenbucket's claims were. Mr. Hay called for me in Holland and insisted I come, which I did, but I found few people shared Glenbucket’s views except for the late Lord Kinmore [653], whom I went to the country to bring to town to see him. The situation had changed significantly, as everyone was realizing that Great Britain's interests would always be sacrificed for Hanover's as long as this family remained on the throne. Parliamentary schemes were nothing but fantasies, and the few troops left on the island were too far from the coast to arrive in time before the country was overrun. The bleak outlook for the country being devastated by the large standing army that would inevitably follow a peace agreement, given that the troops raised during the war would be significant and there was no expectation of a reduction after their return—rather a certainty they would stay—made it seem like the best opportunity to bring us under military rule. These and many other reasons led L[ochie]l to believe that now was the right moment to take bold action for the King, and Sir A[lexander] M[acdonald]’s letter to the Duke of P[erth] suggests that these reasons influenced him and provided enough justification for the proposal.

[154] John (Lindsay), 20th earl, born 1702. Entered Russian army; was badly wounded at Krotzka, 1739, fighting the Turks, and never properly recovered. First colonel of the 43rd (afterwards 42nd) Highlanders. Brig.-gen. at Fontenoy; maj.-gen. 1745. Came to Scotland February 1746, and commanded the Hessian troops under the Prince of Hesse in Stirling and Perthshire. Died 1749.

[154] John (Lindsay), 20th Earl, born in 1702. He joined the Russian army and was seriously injured at Krotzka in 1739 while fighting the Turks, resulting in never fully recovering. He was the first colonel of the 43rd (later 42nd) Highlanders. He became a Brigadier General at Fontenoy and a Major General in 1745. He arrived in Scotland in February 1746 and commanded the Hessian troops under the Prince of Hesse in Stirling and Perthshire. He died in 1749.

[155] Née Hon. Anne Stewart, daughter of Alexander, 6th Lord Blantyre. Died March 1743.

[155] Born Hon. Anne Stewart, daughter of Alexander, 6th Lord Blantyre. Died March 1743.

[156] i.e. John Murray.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ e.g. John Murray.

[157] This is evidently the letter that Murray complains bitterly Traquair showed to Balhaldy, and on his advice destroyed (Murray’s Memorials, pp. 58-60).

[157] This is clearly the letter that Murray angrily said Traquair showed to Balhaldy, and based on his advice, it was destroyed (Murray’s Memorials, pp. 58-60).

[158] This Letter I wrote in the smoothest stile possible purposely to show him that the King’s friends were so far from having any Inclination to Dictate to him, that on the Contrary they wished by all means to have him Heartily to promote the Restoration, and shewed the letter to Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and L[ochiel]l before I gave it his Lordship to carry and they both approved of it.

[158] I wrote this letter in the smoothest style possible to show him that the King’s friends were not at all inclined to dictate terms to him. On the contrary, they genuinely wanted him to wholeheartedly support the Restoration. I shared the letter with Lord T[ra]q[uai]r and L[ochiel]l before giving it to his Lordship to deliver, and they both approved of it.

[159] I had mentioned in my Letter to the King that the Ship by which our Letters used to come was much suspected and had been searched, so one of my Errands was to have a new Conveyance settled which was done from London to Paris by Mr. D[rummond] but could be so easily done from London here.

[159] I had mentioned in my letter to the King that the ship we used to receive our letters was under suspicion and had been searched, so one of my tasks was to arrange a new way to send them, which Mr. D[rummond] set up from London to Paris, but it could be arranged just as easily from London to here.

[160] His Grace the Duke of P[erth] when I had the honour of seeing him at York on my Road, desired I would acquaint his Majesty that he had a Scheme for taking Stirling Castle and desired His Majesty would impower him upon the Seizing of it to give a commission to whom he should think fitt to name as Governour for the Time it was garrisoned with his men as they would the more willingly obey if the Commander was named by him, but told me no particulars of his project neither did he since when I told him what the King had wrote.

[160] His Grace the Duke of P[erth], when I had the honor of seeing him in York on my way, asked me to inform His Majesty that he had a plan to take Stirling Castle. He requested that His Majesty empower him to appoint someone as governor once it was seized, as his men would be more willing to follow a commander he chose. However, he didn't share any specific details of his plan, nor did he do so later when I told him what the King had written.

[161] Mr. Edgar having wrote about it in a former Letter occasioned my telling him that it was borrowed by Lord T[ra]q[uair].

[161] Mr. Edgar wrote about it in a previous letter, which led me to mention that it was borrowed by Lord T[ra]q[uair].

[162] A frequent cipher name for the Chevalier de St. George.

[162] A common code name for the Chevalier de St. George.

[163] Mr. Drummond told when at Paris that the method he had taken with the Gentlemen of the highlands was this. He talked to them of the situation of the Country and that a Restoration was the only thing would save us, with a great deal more to this purpose, which brought all those that inclined that way to declare how sensible they were of it and that they were very willing to promote it so soon as an Occasion should offer; upon which he told them that it was impossible for the King to undertake any things not knowing who were his friends and that he thought they should take care to acquaint the King of it, then it was natural for them to say they were contented his Majesty was informed it, but did not know of a method how; upon which he told them that he would not absolutely promise, but would endeavour to fall upon a method to acquaint him. This I took to be a safe way for the person that engaged them and as his Majesty was not quite satisfied with it as he said he desired me to write my Opinion of it which to the best of my Remembrance was in a few words, that I thought no Body would be so rediculous as to inform against themselves by telling they had given a Commission to such a person to ye King as it must redound to their own disadvantage for as their was none present when the matter was spoke off to a person that was to deliver it had no more to do but deny it and his not engaging absolutely to make it known was keeping his correspondence a secret, for which reasons I was then of opinion that the same method might be followed in the Low Country, but upon trial found it almost impossible and dangerous, first, because the Generallity are not so loyally inclined as in the Highlands and consequently not so easily brought to speak their mind, and the next place they have no following, they Generally tell you, of what use is the King’s knowing that I wish him well, I am only single Person, that can be of little Service, thirdly the present Government has been at pain to perswade people; the King is betrayed and that passes at Rome, but what they are fully informed off which makes people shy and affraid to have any dealings that way as they are near the Court of Justice and less able to shift for themselves, and fourthly, when a number of those people come to be spoke to they will some of them especially who are not brought all length in confidence impart to the other that such a man talked so and so, whereby the thing may come to be known and render it dangerous for the persons, all this occur’d to me upon serious reflection and found the difficulty of it, upon talking to some with folks here in that stile after my return and succeeded with none but two Mr. N. of D—n and Mr. C—r of Cr—g—th,[654] the last of which was drunk and repented next day for which I gave it up.

[163] Mr. Drummond mentioned while in Paris that the approach he took with the gentlemen from the Highlands was this. He spoke to them about the state of the country and that a restoration was the only thing that would save us, with a lot more to this effect, which made those who were leaning in that direction express how aware they were of it and that they were very willing to support it as soon as an opportunity arose; in response, he told them it was impossible for the King to take any action without knowing who his friends were and suggested they should inform the King about it. Naturally, they said they were fine with his Majesty knowing, but didn’t know how to go about it; he replied that he wouldn’t make any absolute promises, but would try to figure out a way to inform him. I took this to be a safe approach for the person who engaged them, and since his Majesty wasn’t completely satisfied with it, he asked me to share my opinion, which to the best of my recollection was that I didn’t think anyone would be foolish enough to inform against themselves by saying they had given a commission to such a person to the King, as it would only work to their own disadvantage. Since there was no one present when this was discussed, the person who was supposed to relay the information could simply deny it, and his not fully committing to make it known was keeping his contacts secret. For these reasons, I thought the same method could be tried in the Low Country, but upon attempting it, I found it almost impossible and risky. First, because the general populace isn’t as loyal as in the Highlands and, as a result, isn’t easily persuaded to express their opinions. Secondly, they have no support base; they generally say, what use is it for the King to know that I wish him well? I’m just one person who can be of little help. Thirdly, the current government has worked hard to convince people that the King is betrayed, which is what people are hearing in Rome. This makes them hesitant and afraid to engage in that direction, as they are close to the Justice Court and less able to protect themselves. Fourthly, when a number of these people are spoken to, especially those who aren’t fully trusted, they might tell others that so-and-so said this or that, which could lead to the information being exposed, making it dangerous for those involved. All this came to mind after careful thought, and I realized the difficulty of it after speaking with some people in this manner upon my return, but I succeeded with only two: Mr. N. of D—n and Mr. C—r of Cr—g—th,[654] the latter of whom was drunk and regretted it the next day, so I abandoned the effort.

[164] A non-juring minister at Edinburgh; father of Lord Eskgrove.

[164] A non-juring minister in Edinburgh; father of Lord Eskgrove.

[165] Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat (Skye), 7th baronet. His first wife was Anne Erskine (died 1735), widow of James (Ogilvy), 4th de jure Earl of Airlie (died 1731). The Earl of Airlie mentioned here was his brother, 5th de jure earl (died 1761). He remained passive during the ’45, but his son Lord Ogilvy raised two battalions for Prince Charles.

[165] Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat (Skye), 7th baronet. His first wife was Anne Erskine (died 1735), who was the widow of James (Ogilvy), the 4th de jure Earl of Airlie (died 1731). The Earl of Airlie mentioned here was his brother, the 5th de jure earl (died 1761). He stayed neutral during the ’45, but his son Lord Ogilvy raised two battalions for Prince Charles.

[166] Henry, Duke of York, afterwards cardinal.

[166] Henry, Duke of York, who later became a cardinal.

[167] I cannot now recollect from whom I had that information, but it was such that in the time I had reason to Credit it.

[167] I can't remember who told me that information, but at the time, I had good reason to believe it.

[168] This was owing to Sir A[lexander] M[acdonald] having promised for a number supperior to what Mr. Drummond had marked him down for and at the same time as some folks were laying to his Charge we did not believe it was thought fitt to say something favourable of him as we had an entire confidence in his honesty.

[168] This was because Sir A[lexander] M[acdonald] had promised a number higher than what Mr. Drummond had indicated for him, and while some people were blaming him, we felt it wasn't right to say anything negative about him since we completely trusted his integrity.

[169] Bishop Rattray died at Edinburgh, May 12, 1743.

[169] Bishop Rattray passed away in Edinburgh on May 12, 1743.

[170] Battle of Dettingen, fought 16th June old style, or 27th new style, 1743.

[170] Battle of Dettingen, fought June 16th old style, or June 27th new style, 1743.

[171] The Highland Regiment, originally the 43rd and afterwards the 42nd, was raised in the name of John, 20th Earl of Crawford (then lying wounded at Belgrade), in 1739, and first embodied 1740. It was sent to London in 1743, and there its members, who understood on enlistment that their service was for the Highlands only, were persuaded that the Government intended to send them to the plantations or to sell them into slavery. When encamped at Highgate more than two hundred of them left the camp by night in May 1743 and started to march to Scotland. They were overtaken and surrounded when near Oundle in Northamptonshire; they surrendered and were marched prisoners to the Tower. Three of their leaders were executed, Corporals Samuel and Malcolm Macpherson and private Farquhar Shaw, all of Clan Chattan.

[171] The Highland Regiment, originally the 43rd and later known as the 42nd, was formed in the name of John, the 20th Earl of Crawford (who was then wounded in Belgrade), in 1739, and officially established in 1740. It was sent to London in 1743, where its members, who had joined with the understanding that their service was solely for the Highlands, were convinced that the Government planned to send them to the plantations or sell them into slavery. While camped at Highgate, over two hundred of them left the camp at night in May 1743 and began marching to Scotland. They were caught and surrounded near Oundle in Northamptonshire; ultimately, they surrendered and were taken prisoner to the Tower. Three of their leaders were executed: Corporals Samuel and Malcolm Macpherson and Private Farquhar Shaw, all from Clan Chattan.

[172] There had been heavy recruiting for the Scots Brigade in the service of the Netherlands.

[172] There had been intense recruiting for the Scots Brigade in the service of the Netherlands.

[173] Sir Thomas Gordon of Earlston, 3rd baronet, whose grandfather (killed at Bothwell Bridge) and father were eminent Covenanter leaders. Murray hoped to secure the adherence of the Cameronian Covenanters through Gordon and Dr. Cochran (see p. 51) and others. Cf. Murray’s Memorials, p. 54.

[173] Sir Thomas Gordon of Earlston, 3rd baronet, whose grandfather (killed at Bothwell Bridge) and father were prominent leaders of the Covenanters. Murray aimed to gain the support of the Cameronian Covenanters through Gordon, Dr. Cochran (see p. 51), and others. See Murray’s Memorials, p. 54.

[174] Sir James Stewart; see Appendix.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sir James Stewart; see Appendix.

[175] David (Wemyss), Lord Elcho, eldest son of James, 4th Earl of Wemyss. Joined Prince Charles at Edinburgh and served through the campaign. Forfeited, and lived in exile until his death in 1787. See his Memoir by Hon. Evan Charteris, prefaced to A Short Account of the Affairs of Scotland, 1744-46.

[175] David (Wemyss), Lord Elcho, the oldest son of James, 4th Earl of Wemyss. He joined Prince Charles in Edinburgh and served throughout the campaign. He was forfeited and lived in exile until his death in 1787. See his Memoir by Hon. Evan Charteris, prefaced to A Short Account of the Affairs of Scotland, 1744-46.

[176] Norman Macleod of Macleod, nineteenth chief; born 1706; died 1772. He engaged to join Prince Charles although he came alone; but he changed his mind, was the first to communicate the Prince’s landing to the Lord President, and was the vindictive foe of Prince Charles throughout the whole adventure.

[176] Norman Macleod of Macleod, the nineteenth chief; born in 1706; died in 1772. He initially agreed to support Prince Charles, even though he arrived alone; however, he had a change of heart, was the first to inform the Lord President about the Prince’s arrival, and became a bitter enemy of Prince Charles throughout the entire ordeal.

[177] This was Alexander (or Alistair), Lord Lovat’s second son, by his wife Margaret Grant, sister of Sir James Grant of Grant. Born 1729, died unmarried 1762.

[177] This was Alexander (or Alistair), Lord Lovat’s second son, by his wife Margaret Grant, sister of Sir James Grant of Grant. Born in 1729, died unmarried in 1762.

The school at Prestonpans was kept by Mr. John Halket who had been tutor in Lovat’s family at Castle Downie. Peggy Vint’s was a tavern in Prestonpans. Alexander Carlyle gives an account of an extraordinary carouse there in 1741, at which Lovat, Erskine of Grange, Halket, four Fraser henchmen, young Lovat, Halket’s son, and Carlyle were present. Lovat said Grace in French, and he ‘swore more than fifty dragoons’ at the fish. The claret was excellent and circulated fast. There was a piper at the tavern, and the landlady’s daughter Kate was ‘very alluring.’ Lovat, then seventy-five, and Grange not much younger, warmed with wine, insisted on dancing a reel with Kate Vint: ‘this was a scene not easily forgotten.’ A banquet at Grange’s house of Preston, with a ‘new deluge of excellent claret,’ finished what Carlyle calls ‘a very memorable day.’—Carlyle, Autobiography, p. 58.

The school in Prestonpans was run by Mr. John Halket, who had previously been a tutor for the Lovat family at Castle Downie. Peggy Vint’s was a tavern in Prestonpans. Alexander Carlyle recounts an incredible party there in 1741, attended by Lovat, Erskine of Grange, Halket, four henchmen from the Fraser clan, young Lovat, Halket’s son, and Carlyle himself. Lovat said Grace in French and jokingly “cursed more than fifty dragoons” at the fish. The claret was exceptional and flowed freely. There was a piper at the tavern, and the landlady’s daughter, Kate, was “very tempting.” Lovat, then seventy-five, and Grange, not much younger, encouraged by the wine, insisted on dancing a reel with Kate Vint: “this was a scene not easily forgotten.” A feast at Grange’s house in Preston, with “a new flood of excellent claret,” rounded off what Carlyle describes as “a very memorable day.”—Carlyle, Autobiography, p. 58.

[178] About this time Sir J. Ca[mpbe]ll had the misfortune to have his house burnt and lost everything in it, even to his Body Cloaks. The deplorable situation he was in, never having received any of the money promised him save 200£ call for immediate assistance, and still the more so, that he had from time to time borrowed Money upon his Honour to Return it in such a time, as he had always reason to expect his pension wou’d answer, his failing in which necessarly weakened his Interest in the Country, for two reasons: 1st that he had no money to enable him to entertain and visit his neighbours, and 2ndly So he was not able to keep his word to them from whom he had borrowed it. Both shaggerined him and naturally made him the less confided in other matters, for which reasons I wrote presently to my Lord T[ra]q[uai]r, to write Mr. Drummond then at London, that the money might be gott as he then had the bond I mentioned before in his Custody, but he still putt it off by saying that nothing could be done in it till he went over, as the money was to be gott in france, which was a most rediculous reason, for he told me in paris that it was through Lord Semple he was to find it, which had it been the Case there was no occasion for the things being delayed till he went over, as he was to have no influence but ought to have sent it to Lord Semple. However I don’t believe it will be found upon inquiring yt, Lord Semple knew any thing of the matter for Mr. Drummond would not agree that I should mention the thing to him when at paris, so that I am fully convinced that it was as I have said befor, all a fetch to prevent writing to the King about it, for fear that he should be disapointed of the 4,000 Livres a year he has since got settled upon him.

[178] Around this time, Sir J. Campbell unfortunately had his house burned down and lost everything in it, even his cloaks. The terrible situation he was in, having only received £200 of the money promised to him, called for immediate assistance. This was even more pressing since he had borrowed money on his honor to return it within a certain timeframe, as he always expected his pension would cover it. Failing to receive that pension naturally weakened his standing in the community for two reasons: first, he had no funds to entertain and visit his neighbors, and second, he couldn't keep his word to those from whom he borrowed money. Both of these circumstances disappointed him and understandably made others trust him less in other matters. For these reasons, I promptly wrote to my Lord Traquair, asking him to write to Mr. Drummond, who was in London, so that the money could be retrieved since he had the bond I mentioned earlier in his possession. However, he kept postponing it, claiming that nothing could be done until he went over, as the money was to be obtained in France. This was a ridiculous excuse because he had told me in Paris that he was supposed to get it through Lord Semple. If that were the case, there would have been no reason to delay until he went over; he had no influence over it and should have just sent it to Lord Semple. However, I don't believe inquiries will show that Lord Semple was aware of the situation, as Mr. Drummond wouldn't allow me to mention it to him while in Paris. So, I am fully convinced, as I've said before, that it was all a ruse to avoid writing to the King about it, fearing he would be disappointed about the 4,000 Livres a year he has since had settled on him.

[179] Lord Lovat must surely have been deceiving or deceived. It was the proud boast of the Monroes that the clan had remained constant to Covenanting principles and to the Protestant succession, being the only Whig clan that never wavered. The Munroes were the only Highlanders who joined Cope on his march to Inverness in 1745.

[179] Lord Lovat must have been either tricking someone or being tricked himself. The Monroes proudly claimed that their clan stayed true to Covenanting beliefs and supported the Protestant succession, being the only Whig clan that never faltered. The Munroes were the only Highlanders who joined Cope on his march to Inverness in 1745.

[180] John Boyle, 5th earl; succeeded as 5th Earl of Cork, 1751; a man of letters; friend of Swift, Pope, and Johnson; died 1762.

[180] John Boyle, 5th Earl of Cork; became the 5th Earl in 1751; a literary figure; friend of Swift, Pope, and Johnson; died in 1762.

[181] Of Wynnstay, 3rd Baronet, M.P. for Denbigh, an ardent Jacobite, almost openly avowed.

[181] Of Wynnstay, 3rd Baronet, M.P. for Denbigh, a passionate Jacobite, almost openly declared.

[182] 7th February 1744.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ February 7, 1744.

[183] He is marry’d to a sister of mine, and upon the Change of the Ministry was made keeper of the Signet, through the Marquiss of Tweedales Interest in the Room of Mr. Mcmillan the Writer.

[183] He is married to one of my sisters, and when the Ministry changed, he was appointed keeper of the Signet, thanks to the Marquess of Tweedale's influence, replacing Mr. McMillan the Writer.

[184] Thomas Hay of Huntington, East Lothian, advocate; Keeper of the Signet, 1742-46; raised to the Bench as Lord Huntington 1754. His brother, John Hay of Restalrig, W.S., succeeded John Murray as Secretary to Prince Charles on Murray’s falling ill at Inverness, in 1746.

[184] Thomas Hay of Huntington, East Lothian, lawyer; Keeper of the Signet from 1742 to 1746; appointed to the Bench as Lord Huntington in 1754. His brother, John Hay of Restalrig, W.S., took over from John Murray as Secretary to Prince Charles when Murray became ill in Inverness in 1746.

[185] Robert Dundas of Arniston, first President Dundas; born 1685; was Lord Advocate, 1720-25; raised to the Bench as Lord Arniston 1737; became Lord President on the death of Duncan Forbes of Culloden 1748; died 1753. He was the father of Henry (Dundas), 1st Lord Melville.

[185] Robert Dundas of Arniston, the first President Dundas; born in 1685; was Lord Advocate from 1720 to 1725; became a judge as Lord Arniston in 1737; took over as Lord President after Duncan Forbes of Culloden died in 1748; passed away in 1753. He was the father of Henry (Dundas), 1st Lord Melville.

[186] Sir John Inglis of Cramond, Postmaster-General of Scotland.

[186] Sir John Inglis of Cramond, Postmaster-General of Scotland.

[187] Alexander Arbuthnott of Knox, merchant in Edinburgh; grandson of the 1st Viscount Arbuthnott; became Commissioner of Customs 1742; died 1769.

[187] Alexander Arbuthnott of Knox, a merchant in Edinburgh; grandson of the 1st Viscount Arbuthnott; became the Commissioner of Customs in 1742; died in 1769.

[188] Andrew Fletcher, Lord Milton, nephew of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun the great opposer of the Union. Born 1692; elevated to Scottish Bench 1724; Lord-Justice-Clerk 1735-48; died 1766.

[188] Andrew Fletcher, Lord Milton, was the nephew of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, who was a major opponent of the Union. He was born in 1692, appointed to the Scottish Bench in 1724, served as Lord-Justice-Clerk from 1735 to 1748, and died in 1766.

[189] Joshua Guest, born 1660; Lieut.-General 1745; died 1747. This is the only categorical statement which I am aware of that Guest was Commander-in-Chief in Scotland before the appointment of Sir John Cope (18th February 1744). Cf. Book of Old Edinburgh Club, 1909, p. 17.

[189] Joshua Guest, born 1660; Lieutenant General 1745; died 1747. This is the only definite information I have that Guest was Commander-in-Chief in Scotland before Sir John Cope's appointment (February 18, 1744). See Book of Old Edinburgh Club, 1909, p. 17.

[190] Hunter of Polmood was buried in Drumelzier Churchyard on Thursday, February 23, 1744, which dates this incident. His son, Charles Hunter, was married to Murray’s sister, Veronica.

[190] Hunter of Polmood was buried in Drumelzier Churchyard on Thursday, February 23, 1744, which marks the date of this event. His son, Charles Hunter, was married to Veronica, who is Murray’s sister.

[191] William M‘Dougall, wine merchant in Edinburgh, a brother-in-law of John Murray’s. See Memorials, pp. 66, 301, 311.

[191] William M'Dougall, a wine merchant in Edinburgh and John Murray's brother-in-law. See Memorials, pp. 66, 301, 311.

[192] Probably Dr. Cochran of Roughfoil, a physician in Edinburgh. He may have been a connection of Murray’s, whose aunt Margaret was married to Alex. Cochran of Barbachlaw. Cf. Memorials, pp. 38, 54.

[192] Probably Dr. Cochran from Roughfoil, a doctor in Edinburgh. He might have been related to Murray, whose aunt Margaret was married to Alex Cochran from Barbachlaw. Cf. Memorials, pp. 38, 54.

[193] John M‘Leod of Muiravonside, Stirlingshire, an advocate. His son, Alexander, was A.D.C. to Prince Charles.

[193] John M‘Leod of Muiravonside, Stirlingshire, a lawyer. His son, Alexander, was A.D.C. to Prince Charles.

[194] Hartree, a Peeblesshire estate, in Kilbucho Parish, about seven miles from Broughton. The laird of Hartree, John Dickson, was married to Murray’s aunt Anne.

[194] Hartree, a Peeblesshire estate, in Kilbucho Parish, about seven miles from Broughton. The owner of Hartree, John Dickson, was married to Anne, Murray's aunt.

[195] French Fleet wrecked, 25th February old style, 7th March new style, 1744.

[195] The French Fleet was wrecked on February 25th, 1744 (old style), March 7th (new style).

[196] On this occasion, as on a subsequent escape from capture, the Duke took refuge in the Invercauld country. See post, p, 271.

[196] On this occasion, just like during a later escape from capture, the Duke sought safety in the Invercauld area. See post, p, 271.

[197] Charles Stewart, 5th of Ardshiel, a cadet of Appin. He led out the Stewarts of Appin in 1745. Fled to France after Culloden, and died 1757. (He is the chief for whom Alan Breck collected rents. See Kidnapped, by R. L. Stevenson, chap. ix.)

[197] Charles Stewart, 5th of Ardshiel, a descendant of Appin. He led the Stewarts of Appin in 1745. He fled to France after Culloden and died in 1757. (He is the chief for whom Alan Breck collected rents. See Kidnapped, by R. L. Stevenson, chap. ix.)

[198] Balhaldy.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Balhaldy.

[199] Probably House of Commons.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Likely House of Commons.

[200] Balhaldy.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Balhaldy.

[201] Balhaldy.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Balhaldy.

[202] The names in this letter have been deciphered partly by comparison with other ciphers; partly from information given by Murray in his Memorials; occasionally by conjecture, in which last case the word ‘probably’ is prefixed.

[202] The names in this letter have been figured out partly by comparing them with other codes; partly from information provided by Murray in his Memorials; and sometimes by guessing, in which case the word ‘probably’ is added.

[203] Sempill or Balhaldy.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sempill or Balhaldy.

[204] Probably 21st September 1744. Murray wrote two letters to Prince Charles from Senlis, on 21st September (which was a Wednesday). Both are given in Murray’s Memorials, pp. 376, 379.

[204] Likely 21st September 1744. Murray sent two letters to Prince Charles from Senlis on 21st September (which was a Wednesday). Both are found in Murray’s Memorials, pp. 376, 379.

[205] Probably Captain Clephan of Villegass’s Regiment, the second Scots regiment in the service of the Netherlands. See Murray’s Memorials, pp. 101, etc., for this, and following notes.

[205] Probably Captain Clephan of Villegass’s Regiment, the second Scottish regiment serving in the Netherlands. See Murray’s Memorials, pp. 101, etc., for this and the following notes.

[206] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ King Charles.

[207] Rotterdam.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Rotterdam.

[208] Captain Anderson, also of Villegass’s Regiment.

[208] Captain Anderson, also from Villegass’s Regiment.

[209] Officers of his regiment (probably).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Officers from his unit (likely).

[210] Colyear’s, that is the regiment of the Hon. W. P. Colyear, son of the 1st Earl of Portmore, Colonel of the third Scots regiment in the Netherlands.

[210] Colyear’s, which is the regiment of the Hon. W. P. Colyear, son of the 1st Earl of Portmore, Colonel of the third Scots regiment in the Netherlands.

[211] Lord Elcho.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Lord Elcho.

[212] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Prince Charles.

[213] Probably 30th September 1744.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Probably September 30, 1744.

[214] Dr. Barry.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Dr. Barry.

[215] Probably Adam Cockburn, a hosier in Johnstone’s Court, Charing Cross. See Murray’s Memorials, p. 454.

[215] Probably Adam Cockburn, a hosier in Johnstone’s Court, Charing Cross. See Murray’s Memorials, p. 454.

[216] Not quite intelligible, something probably omitted, but apparently meaning that letters for the Prince are to be addressed to the care of ‘Morris,’ an occasional pseudonym for Charles Smith of Boulogne.

[216] Not entirely clear, something seems to have been left out, but it appears to mean that letters for the Prince should be sent to 'Morris,' which is sometimes a pseudonym for Charles Smith from Boulogne.

[217] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ King Charles.

[218] The King of France.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ The King of France.

[219] Probably the English.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Probably the Brits.

[220] Probably the Scots.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Probably the Scots.

[221] A Restoration.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A Revamp.

[222] Earl of Traquair.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Earl of Traquair.

[223] Scotland.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Scotland.

[224] Scotland.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Scotland.

[225] Perhaps ‘Skye’ referring to the clan of Sir Alexander Macdonald, who was then in collusion with the Jacobites.

[225] Maybe ‘Skye’ refers to the clan of Sir Alexander Macdonald, who was then working with the Jacobites.

[226] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ King Charles.

[227] Probably Nisbet of Dirleton. See Murray’s Memorials, p. 103.

[227] Probably Nisbet of Dirleton. See Murray’s Memorials, p. 103.

[228] Probably England.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Probably UK.

[229] Earl of Traquair.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Earl of Traquair.

[230] Sir James Steuart.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sir James Steuart.

[231] Duke of Perth.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Duke of Perth.

[232] Lochiel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Lochiel.

[233] Duke of Perth.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Duke of Perth.

[234] Earl of Traquair.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Earl of Traquair.

[235] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Prince Charles.

[236] Probably English and Scots.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Likely English and Scottish.

[237] Macleod of Macleod.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Macleod of Macleod.

[238] Sir James Steuart.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sir James Steuart.

[239] Probably young Glengarry (whom Mr. Andrew Lang identifies as Pickle the Spy).

[239] Probably young Glengarry (whom Mr. Andrew Lang identifies as Pickle the Spy).

[240] N.B.—I am satisfyd the reason for their so doing was that they found themselves blown, and imagined Mr. Burnet would soon drop them, for which they were resolved to prevent him by refusing to Act, and thereby give themselves the Air of significancy. As for the reason they give, in my Opinion it is inexpressibly frivelous and even betraying of their own want of a hearty Zeal, for their Masters Interest. For had I, either from Roguery, Ignorance, or folly, deceived Mr. Burnet in what I said, it was no reason for their Giving up a Scheme of such Extensive consequence, which plainly shows its not from principle they Act. At the same time I cannot see the least ground to believe they had any scheme going on, as they kept no correspondance with any of the Ministers save Mr. Orri,[655] as I was informed whose department did not lead him to treat of such like matters, neither was there then the least thing for an Expedition. As to my advice to Mr. Burnet, it is sufficient he knew it to be in every sense absolutely false, but the view they had in so doing is too obvious not to be seen through. They knew Kinny was just going over, and, as he is a man of Consequence in the Country, could they have influenced him against me they would thereby have broke the force of my Representations, being satisfied I would not fail in my arrival here to make known their shameful procedure to Mr. Edwards friends, and I must observe since at it was a very convenient time as Mr. Burnet seemed resolved to make the Money they promised to procure for Arms, the touchstone of their Veracity, and the frenches sincerity, so that their refusing to act at that time prevented the Sd—v believing them baffled men.

[240] N.B.—I'm convinced the reason they did this was that they realized they were in a bad situation and thought Mr. Burnet would drop them soon. To avoid that, they decided to refuse to act, trying to make themselves seem important. In my opinion, their reasoning is ridiculously trivial and shows a complete lack of genuine enthusiasm for their master's interests. If I had, whether out of deceit, ignorance, or foolishness, misled Mr. Burnet in what I said, it shouldn't have caused them to abandon such an important plan, which clearly indicates they are not acting out of principle. At the same time, I see no reason to believe they had any plan in motion since they didn't keep in touch with any of the ministers except for Mr. Orri,[655] who, as I was informed, was not involved in such matters, and there was nothing at that time that suggested an expedition was underway. Regarding my advice to Mr. Burnet, he knew it was completely false, but their motives are too obvious to miss. They knew Kinny was about to arrive, and since he is a significant figure in the country, if they could sway him against me, they could undermine my claims. They were sure I wouldn't hesitate to expose their disgraceful actions to Mr. Edwards' associates upon my arrival. I should note that it was a particularly opportune time since Mr. Burnet seemed determined to use the money they promised to secure for arms as a test of their honesty and the sincerity of the French, making their refusal to act at that time prevent the Sd—v from considering them to be outmatched.

[241] Captain John Drummond, a nephew of Balhaldy’s.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Captain John Drummond, Balhaldy’s nephew.

[242] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Prince Charles.

[243] Prince Charles.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ King Charles.

[244] King.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ King.

[245] Rome.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Rome.

[246] The Chevalier de St. George.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ The Chevalier de Saint-George.

[247] Duke of Perth.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Duke of Perth.

[248] Earl of Traquair.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Earl of Traquair.

[249] Lochiel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Lochiel.

[250] Scotland.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Scotland.

[251] James Fea of Clestrain (or Clesterton), in Stronsay, constituted himself a Jacobite leader in Orkney and attempted to raise men for the Prince. In March 1746 when Lord Macleod took his regiment to Thurso, Mackenzie of Ardloch, invited by Fea, went over to Stromness to raise men and money. None of the islanders were willing to go out, and Ardloch declined to take unwilling recruits although Fea offered to press some men. Ardloch, however, carried off £145 of cess and a quantity of smuggled brandy. For his indiscretion, Fea’s house of Sound in the island of Shapinsay was burnt down in May by the crews of a squadron sent to hunt down Jacobites, while Fea concealed himself in Caithness until the passing of the Act of Indemnity. (See Allan Fea, The Real Captain Cleveland, p. 175; L. in M., ii. 337.)

[251] James Fea of Clestrain (or Clesterton), in Stronsay, declared himself a Jacobite leader in Orkney and tried to gather support for the Prince. In March 1746, when Lord Macleod took his regiment to Thurso, Mackenzie of Ardloch, invited by Fea, went over to Stromness to recruit men and raise funds. None of the locals were willing to participate, and Ardloch refused to take unwilling recruits even though Fea offered to force some men into service. However, Ardloch managed to take away £145 in taxes and a stash of smuggled brandy. As a consequence of his recklessness, Fea’s house in Sound on the island of Shapinsay was burned down in May by crews from a squadron sent to hunt Jacobites, while Fea hid out in Caithness until the Act of Indemnity was passed. (See Allan Fea, The Real Captain Cleveland, p. 175; L. in M., ii. 337.)

[252] A battle fought at Altimarlach three miles west of Wick, in 1680, between George Sinclair of Keiss, afterwards 7th Earl of Caithness and Sir John Campbell of Glenurchy, afterwards 1st Earl of Breadalbane. Sinclair’s kinsman the 6th earl, falling into debt and having no children, had disponed his titles, property and heritable jurisdictions to Sir John Campbell, the principal creditor, who married the earl’s widow in 1678, having managed the previous year to secure a patent from Charles II. as Earl of Caithness. Sinclair of Keiss resisted his claims by force, and Campbell marched an army of his own men and some royal troops to Caithness. The first advantage was with the Sinclairs, who celebrated the event with drunken revelry aggravated by finding a whisky-laden ship strategically stranded by the Campbells in Wick harbour. Next day the Sinclairs were defeated. It was on this occasion that the air ‘The Campbells are coming’ was composed by Finlay Macivor the celebrated piper of Breadalbane. (Calder, Hist. of Caithness, p. 162.) The courts found later that Keiss (grandson of the 5th earl) was entitled to the Caithness earldom; Sir John Campbell was compensated by being created Earl of Breadalbane in 1681, but with the precedency of the Caithness grant 1677.

[252] A battle took place at Altimarlach three miles west of Wick in 1680, between George Sinclair of Keiss, who later became the 7th Earl of Caithness, and Sir John Campbell of Glenurchy, who later became the 1st Earl of Breadalbane. Sinclair’s relative, the 6th earl, fell into debt and, having no children, transferred his titles, property, and heritable jurisdictions to Sir John Campbell, his primary creditor. Campbell married the earl’s widow in 1678 and managed to obtain a patent from Charles II naming him Earl of Caithness the previous year. Sinclair of Keiss opposed his claims with force, prompting Campbell to lead an army of his own men along with some royal troops into Caithness. The initial advantage went to the Sinclairs, who celebrated their success with drunken festivities, heightened by discovering a whisky-laden ship that had been strategically stranded by the Campbells in Wick harbour. The next day, the Sinclairs were defeated. It was during this event that the tune ‘The Campbells are coming’ was composed by Finlay Macivor, the famous piper of Breadalbane. (Calder, Hist. of Caithness, p. 162.) Later court rulings determined that Keiss (grandson of the 5th earl) was entitled to the Caithness earldom; Sir John Campbell received compensation by being made Earl of Breadalbane in 1681, but with precedence from the Caithness grant of 1677.

[253] This Mr. Gilchrist is scathingly treated in The Lyon (iii. 36). He went ‘to Edinburgh and thence to London to misrepresent and asperse the bulk of the Caithness gentry as enemies to the present establishment.’ He is further said to have collected 250 guineas for himself and to have made his friends ‘believe that he could not continue in Caithness for the wicked Jacobites who had threatened to take away his life and destroy his family.’ The writer, a non-juring minister, who had been a prisoner in London, adds sententiously ‘Honest Whigry that never thinks shame of lying for worldly interest!’

[253] Mr. Gilchrist is harshly criticized in The Lyon (iii. 36). He went “to Edinburgh and then to London to misrepresent and slander most of the Caithness gentry as opponents of the current government.” It’s also said that he pocketed 250 guineas for himself and convinced his friends that he couldn’t stay in Caithness because of the wicked Jacobites who had threatened his life and family. The writer, a non-juring minister who had been imprisoned in London, adds pointedly, “Honest Whigs who never feel ashamed of lying for their own gain!”

[254] George Sinclair of Geese, afterwards captured at Dunrobin, was the only Caithness Sinclair of position who joined the Jacobite army. Lord Macleod marched through Caithness in March 1746, but though the proprietors professed Jacobite sympathies, very few joined his standard. (Fraser, The Earls of Cromartie, ii. 398.)

[254] George Sinclair of Geese, later captured at Dunrobin, was the only prominent Caithness Sinclair who joined the Jacobite army. Lord Macleod marched through Caithness in March 1746, but even though the landowners claimed to support the Jacobites, very few actually rallied to his cause. (Fraser, The Earls of Cromartie, ii. 398.)

[255] Sir James Stewart of Burray, Orkney, took no active part in the Rising, but he was apprehended on suspicion in May 1746, and taken prisoner to London, where he died of fever in the New Gaol, Southwark, the following August.

[255] Sir James Stewart of Burray, Orkney, didn’t take an active role in the Rising, but he was arrested on suspicion in May 1746 and taken to London as a prisoner, where he died of fever in the New Gaol, Southwark, the following August.

[256] George (Mackay), 3rd Lord Reay, b. 1678; suc. his grandfather c. 1680; supported government in 1715; was largely instrumental in establishing the presbytery of Tongue 1725; d. 1748.

[256] George (Mackay), 3rd Lord Reay, born in 1678; succeeded his grandfather around 1680; supported the government in 1715; played a significant role in establishing the presbytery of Tongue in 1725; died in 1748.

[257] William (Gordon-Sutherland), 16th earl; b. 1708; suc. his grandfather 1720; d. 1750. His wife was Lady Elizabeth Wemyss, aunt of Lord Elcho of the ’45. His father acted vigorously against the Jacobites in ’15 and ’19.

[257] William (Gordon-Sutherland), 16th earl; born 1708; succeeded his grandfather in 1720; died 1750. His wife was Lady Elizabeth Wemyss, aunt of Lord Elcho from the '45. His father strongly opposed the Jacobites in '15 and '19.

[258] Assynt in ancient times was the territory of the MacNicols (or MacRyculs or Nicolsons), but in the time of David II. Torquil Macleod IV., of Lewis, married the heiress and obtained the lands. The MacNicols emigrated to Skye, where they have been for centuries. Macleod’s second son inherited Assynt, and there were twelve Macleod lairds. The last of these was Neil Macleod who was tried in 1666, and again in 1674, for betraying the great Marquis of Montrose and other crimes. He was acquitted, but, probably owing to the expense of the trials, he fell into debt, and was driven from his lands which were acquired by the Mackenzies. Cf. p. 107, n. 1.

[258] In ancient times, Assynt was the land of the MacNicols (also known as MacRyculs or Nicolsons), but during the reign of David II., Torquil Macleod IV. from Lewis married the heiress and took control of the lands. The MacNicols moved to Skye, where they have lived for centuries. Macleod's second son inherited Assynt, and there were twelve Macleod lairds. The last of these was Neil Macleod, who was tried in 1666 and again in 1674 for betraying the great Marquis of Montrose and other crimes. He was found not guilty, but likely due to the costs of the trials, he fell into debt and lost his lands, which were taken over by the Mackenzies. Cf. p. 107, n. 1.

[259] See post, p. 96.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 96.

[260] The writer is wrong here. It was the first earl’s grandfather, Sir Roderick Mackenzie (1579-1626), the terrible Tutor of Kintail who married Margaret heiress of Torquil Macleod of Lewis and Cogeach. George (Mackenzie), 1st Earl of Cromarty (1630-1714), was the antiquary. He was an original member of the Royal Society (London), founded 1662.

[260] The writer is mistaken here. It was the first earl’s grandfather, Sir Roderick Mackenzie (1579-1626), the notorious Tutor of Kintail, who married Margaret, the heiress of Torquil Macleod of Lewis and Cogeach. George (Mackenzie), 1st Earl of Cromarty (1630-1714), was the antiquarian. He was a founding member of the Royal Society (London), established in 1662.

[261] See post, p. 104.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 104.

[262] A battle at Sgeir na Caillich on Lochalsh, between the Straits of Kylerhea and Kyleakin. According to the Clan Donald historians, the battle was fought in 1603. It was not Glengarry (Donald, 7th of Glengarry, who died in 1645, aged 102), but his eldest son Angus, ‘Young Glengarry,’ who was killed.

[262] A battle at Sgeir na Caillich on Lochalsh, between the Straits of Kylerhea and Kyleakin. According to Clan Donald historians, the battle took place in 1603. It wasn’t Glengarry (Donald, the 7th of Glengarry, who died in 1645 at the age of 102), but his eldest son Angus, ‘Young Glengarry,’ who was killed.

[263] Now called Glenshiel. The church was erected in the hamlet of Muick.

[263] Now called Glenshiel. The church was built in the village of Muick.

[264] It is hardly likely that the Macraes will accept this suggestion of descent without strong corroboration which does not seem to exist. A very different origin is given by the Rev. Roderick Morison, minister of Kintail in 1793: ‘It is generally allowed that the Mac Raes emigrated from the braes of Aird, on the Lovat estate, to this place, though what induced them to prefer the mountains to the plains is not universally agreed upon, yet certain it is, that long after their residence in Kintail, they maintained a firm alliance with the Frasers of Aird. The tradition which prevails, that an inscription was set up nigh the entrance to Lovat House, bearing “That no Mac Rae must lodge without, when a Fraser resides within,” is not wholly without foundation. When the Mac Raes first entered Kintail, there were several clans inhabiting it, particularly the Mac Aulays, of whom no vestige now remains. The Mac Lennans, a small tribe in the parish of Glensheal, were the only people that would not yield. These Mac Lennans, at the battle of Auldearn, were intrusted with Seaforth’s colours. The novelty of the preferment roused them to action and stubborn resistance, which proved fatal to the clan, for many were slain; and their widows, 18 in number, were afterwards married to Mac Raes. The boundaries which divide the Mac Raes from the Mac Lennans are marked by a river which runs into Lochduich; but common observation may easily trace a line of distinction from the difference in their language and accent.’ Mr. Morison gives the derivation of the name as Mhac Ragh, the son of good fortune, applied by the founder to his son after some successful exploits.—(Statistical Account of Scotland, vi. 242; the story of the great slaughter of Maclellans at Auldearn is modified by latest investigators.) The word Ragh or Rath may mean either ‘good fortune’ or ‘grace,’ and the latest clan historian, Rev. Alex. Macrae, is of opinion that the name has an ecclesiastical origin as the ‘son of grace’ applied to a holy man of old. Relying on tradition, he inclines to believe that the Macraes were from Clunes in the Aird and were of common origin with the Mackenzies and Macleans.

[264] It's unlikely that the Macraes will accept this suggestion of descent without strong evidence, which seems to be lacking. A very different origin is provided by Rev. Roderick Morison, minister of Kintail in 1793: ‘It’s widely believed that the Mac Raes moved from the hills of Aird, on the Lovat estate, to this area, although there’s no consensus on why they chose the mountains over the plains. However, it’s certain that long after settling in Kintail, they maintained a strong alliance with the Frasers of Aird. The tradition that an inscription was placed near the entrance to Lovat House stating, “No Mac Rae may stay here while a Fraser is inside,” has some basis in reality. When the Mac Raes first arrived in Kintail, several clans were already living there, especially the Mac Aulays, of whom no trace now remains. The Mac Lennans, a small tribe in the parish of Glensheal, were the only ones who wouldn’t back down. During the battle of Auldearn, the Mac Lennans were given Seaforth’s colors, which motivated them to fight fiercely, resulting in tragedy for the clan as many were killed, with 18 of their widows later marrying Mac Raes. The boundary separating the Mac Raes from the Mac Lennans is marked by a river flowing into Lochduich; however, anyone can easily identify a distinction based on the difference in their language and accent.’ Mr. Morison explains that the name’s origin is Mhac Ragh, meaning the son of good fortune, given by the founder to his son after achieving success. —(Statistical Account of Scotland, vi. 242; the account of the significant slaughter of Maclellans at Auldearn has been modified by recent researchers.) The word Ragh or Rath could mean either ‘good fortune’ or ‘grace,’ and the most recent clan historian, Rev. Alex. Macrae, believes the name has a religious origin as the ‘son of grace’ linked to a holy man from the past. Trusting in tradition, he tends to think that the Macraes originated from Clunes in the Aird and share a common ancestry with the Mackenzies and Macleans.

The Kintail Macraes were not out in ’45. There was, however, a certain Captain MacRaw in Glengarry’s regiment; he attended Prince Charles when in Lochaber during his wanderings; also a Lieut. Alexander M‘Ra from Banff; and one of the French officers taken prisoner at sea on the voyage to Scotland, was Captain James Macraith of Berwick’s regiment. Gilchrist Macgrath or M‘Kra entertained the Prince in Glen Shiel in his wanderings. Murdoch M‘Raw, ‘nearest relation to the chieftain of that name,’ was barbarously hanged as a spy at Inverness protesting his innocence. (L. in M., i. 205, 342; iii. 378; ii. 205, 299.)

The Kintail Macraes didn’t participate in ’45. However, there was a Captain MacRaw in Glengarry’s regiment; he was with Prince Charles during his time in Lochaber. There was also Lieutenant Alexander M‘Ra from Banff, and one of the French officers captured at sea on the way to Scotland was Captain James Macraith of Berwick’s regiment. Gilchrist Macgrath or M‘Kra hosted the Prince in Glen Shiel during his travels. Murdoch M‘Raw, 'the closest relative to the chief of that name,' was brutally hanged as a spy in Inverness while insisting on his innocence. (L. in M., i. 205, 342; iii. 378; ii. 205, 299.)

[265] See Dickson, The Jacobite Attempt of 1719 (Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xix.).

[265] See Dickson, The Jacobite Attempt of 1719 (Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xix.).

[266] The Long Island is the name given to the chain of the outer Hebrides from the Butt of Lewis to Barra Head, comprising Lewis and Harris, North Uist, Benbecula, South Uist, Eriska, Barra and Mingulay.

[266] Long Island refers to the chain of the outer Hebrides stretching from the Butt of Lewis to Barra Head, which includes Lewis and Harris, North Uist, Benbecula, South Uist, Eriska, Barra, and Mingulay.

[267] The story of the transference of the lands of the ancient and powerful family of Macleod of Lewis to the Mackenzies is one of the most pitiful in Highland history. Towards the middle of the sixteenth century, Roderick (or Ruari) Macleod, the last undisputed Macleod of Lewis, married, as his first wife, a natural daughter of John Mackenzie of Kintail. The wife eloped, the son, named Torquil Connanach, was repudiated. Torquil was brought up at Strath Connan (hence his ‘to-name’) by the Mackenzies, who embraced his cause. From that moment the family of Lewis was doomed. Partly by purchase, partly by marriage, but largely by intrigue and violence the lands of Macleod were acquired by the Mackenzies. Lewis was driven to anarchy; feuds of the worst type ensued, father against sons, brothers murdering brothers. Government interfered; Lewis was forfeited and parcelled out among Lowland colonist-adventurers, who were thwarted by the Mackenzies, and at last were glad to go, and in 1610 to dispose of their rights to Mackenzie, who had become Lord Kintail the previous year. Any rights that remained to his cousin Torquil Macleod were made over to the Mackenzies. Meantime, in 1605, Kintail’s brother Roderick had married the daughter and heiress of Torquil, and became possessed of the mainland property of Coigeach. As soon as the Mackenzies obtained the island, they promptly restored order; the remaining members of the old Macleod family were murdered or driven out under a commission of fire and sword. Kintail’s son became an earl in 1623, and took his title from Loch Seaforth in Lewis, while his uncle Roderick, tutor of Kintail, terrible and ruthless (of whom the Gaelic proverb says ‘there are two things worse than the Tutor of Kintail, frost in spring and mist in the dog-days’), built a castle in Strathpeffer, which he called Castle Leod, and when his grandson obtained the earldom of Cromarty in 1685, the second title then assumed was that of ‘Lord Macleod,’ to show that the heritage of the old family of Macleod of Lewis remained with him.

[267] The story of how the lands of the ancient and powerful Macleod family of Lewis were handed over to the Mackenzies is one of the most tragic in Highland history. In the mid-sixteenth century, Roderick (or Ruari) Macleod, the last undisputed Macleod of Lewis, married a natural daughter of John Mackenzie of Kintail as his first wife. The wife ran away, and their son, named Torquil Connanach, was rejected. Torquil was raised at Strath Connan (which is where his nickname comes from) by the Mackenzies, who supported him. From that point on, the Macleod family of Lewis was doomed. Through a mix of purchases, marriages, but mostly through schemes and violence, the Mackenzies took over Macleod's lands. Lewis descended into chaos; terrible feuds broke out, with fathers against sons and brothers killing each other. The government intervened; Lewis was seized and divided among Lowland colonist-adventurers, who were ultimately stopped by the Mackenzies and were happy to leave, eventually selling their rights to Mackenzie, who had become Lord Kintail the year before in 1610. Any rights that remained for his cousin Torquil Macleod were transferred to the Mackenzies. Meanwhile, in 1605, Kintail’s brother Roderick had married the daughter and heiress of Torquil and gained ownership of the mainland property of Coigeach. As soon as the Mackenzies secured the island, they quickly restored order; the remaining members of the old Macleod family were either killed or driven out through a directive of violence. Kintail’s son became an earl in 1623, taking his title from Loch Seaforth in Lewis, while his uncle Roderick, the tutor of Kintail, who was feared and ruthless (as the Gaelic proverb says, ‘there are two things worse than the Tutor of Kintail, frost in spring and mist in the dog-days’), built a castle in Strathpeffer, which he named Castle Leod. When his grandson acquired the earldom of Cromarty in 1685, the second title he adopted was ‘Lord Macleod,’ to signify that the legacy of the old Macleod family of Lewis lived on with him.

[268] Roderick Macneill of Barra was from home when Prince Charles landed in the neighbouring island of Eriska, July ’45. He took no active part in the rising but was arrested on suspicion in July ’46, taken to London, released in ’47.

[268] Roderick Macneill of Barra was away from home when Prince Charles arrived on the nearby island of Eriska in July '45. He didn't actively participate in the uprising but was arrested on suspicion in July '46, taken to London, and released in '47.

[269] For the Macdonald divisions and claims, see Appendix,

[269] For the Macdonald divisions and claims, see Appendix,

[270] John Mackinnon of Mackinnon was the only one of the three Skye chiefs who went out. He joined with his clan at Edinburgh, and served throughout the campaign, but was absent on duty in Sutherland when Culloden was fought. He was attainted. Prince Charles went to him in his wanderings, and the chief conducted him from Skye to the mainland, for which service he was made prisoner, taken to London, but released in July ’47. He died in Skye, in ’56, aged 75 years. He was a son-in-law of Archbishop Sharpe of St. Andrews.

[270] John Mackinnon of Mackinnon was the only one of the three Skye chiefs who participated. He joined his clan in Edinburgh and fought throughout the campaign, but was stationed in Sutherland when the battle of Culloden took place. He was declared an outlaw. Prince Charles sought him out during his travels, and the chief helped him travel from Skye to the mainland, for which he was captured and taken to London, but was released in July ’47. He passed away in Skye in ’56 at the age of 75. He was the son-in-law of Archbishop Sharpe of St. Andrews.

[271] This is a reference to the well-known story of the conversion of the islanders. The laird, a man ‘much respected,’ an elder of the kirk, reproved by the General Assembly for allowing his people to remain in popery, retrieved his character by driving his tenants from the Catholic chapel to the Protestant church with the vigorous application of a gold-headed cane, called by the Highlanders a yellow stick: from this the Presbyterian religion became known in the islands as Creidimh a bhata bhui, the creed of the yellow stick. Cf. Bellesheim’s Hist. Cath. Church Scot. (iv. 188).

[271] This refers to the famous story of the islanders' conversion. The laird, a man who was "highly respected" and an elder in the church, faced criticism from the General Assembly for letting his people remain Catholics. He restored his reputation by forcefully moving his tenants from the Catholic chapel to the Protestant church using a gold-headed cane, which the Highlanders called a yellow stick. Because of this, the Presbyterian faith became known on the islands as Creidimh a bhata bhui, the creed of the yellow stick. Cf. Bellesheim’s Hist. Cath. Church Scot. (iv. 188).

[272] Called the Parish of the Small Isles.

[272] Known as the Parish of the Small Isles.

[273] Modernly, Loch Hourn = Hell Loch.

[273] Today, Loch Hourn is known as Hell Loch.

[274] Scotus and Barisdale were brothers, both being uncles of the chief of Glengarry. The elder, Angus Macdonell of Scotus, was an old man in ’45, and died the following year. He remained at home, but his eldest son Donald went out with Glengarry. Donald fell wounded at Culloden, and was supposed to have died on the field. The clan historians, however, state that evidence has been found in the Stuart Papers at Windsor that certain marauders landed from a ship at night, carried off a number of wounded, among them Donald of Scotus, who after various adventures was captured by Turkish pirates, and held in bondage ever afterwards. (History of Clan Donald, iii. 324.) Two of Scotus’s younger sons John and Allan were captains in Glengarry’s regiment. Donald’s eldest son Ranald fought on the Government side in ’45 in Loudoun’s regiment. Ranald’s grandson succeeded in 1868 as 18th hereditary chief of Glengarry.

[274] Scotus and Barisdale were brothers and both were uncles of the chief of Glengarry. The older brother, Angus Macdonell of Scotus, was an old man in ’45 and died the following year. He stayed at home, but his eldest son Donald went out with Glengarry. Donald was wounded at Culloden and was thought to have died on the battlefield. However, clan historians claim that evidence found in the Stuart Papers at Windsor shows that some marauders landed from a ship at night and took away several wounded soldiers, including Donald of Scotus, who after various adventures was captured by Turkish pirates and remained in captivity for the rest of his life. (History of Clan Donald, iii. 324.) Two of Scotus’s younger sons, John and Allan, were captains in Glengarry’s regiment. Donald’s eldest son Ranald fought on the Government side in ’45 in Loudoun’s regiment. Ranald’s grandson succeeded in 1868 as the 18th hereditary chief of Glengarry.

For Macdonell of Barisdale, see post, p. 96.

For Macdonell of Barisdale, see post, p. 96.

[275] The Morar family was really not a cadet, but the senior branch of the Clanranald family, descended from the eldest son of Dougall, 6th Clanranald, who was deposed by the clan for cruelty and oppression, and his children excluded for ever from the chiefship, which was conferred on his uncle. Dougall was assassinated in 1520; his family, on whom the lands of Morar were conferred, were known as the ‘MacDhughail Mhorair.’ In 1745 the laird of Morar was Allan, whose mother was a Macdonald of Sleat. He must have been an elderly man, as his wife was an aunt of Lochiel’s, the youngest daughter of Sir Ewan Cameron by his third wife, daughter of the Quaker David Barclay of Urie. Morar was one of the first to meet the Prince on his reaching Lochnanuagh in July ’45. He served as lieut-colonel of the Clanranald regiment. Prince Charles in his wanderings came to him for hospitality in July ’46, and Morar could only give him a cave to sleep in as his house had been burned down. His reception of the Prince, prompted it is said by young Clanranald, was very cold, and he was the object of fierce invective by the chief of Mackinnon, and of sorrowful reproach by Charles himself. (L. in M., iii. 187.) According to the clan historians, Morar had the reputation of being ‘an unmanly, drunken creature all his life.’ (Hist. Cl. Donald, iii. 256.)

[275] The Morar family wasn't actually a cadet branch but the senior branch of the Clanranald family, descended from the eldest son of Dougall, the 6th Clanranald, who was removed by the clan for his cruelty and oppression, which led to his children being permanently excluded from the chiefship, given instead to his uncle. Dougall was assassinated in 1520; his family, who were granted the lands of Morar, were known as the ‘MacDhughail Mhorair.’ In 1745, the laird of Morar was Allan, whose mother was a Macdonald of Sleat. He must have been quite old, as his wife was an aunt of Lochiel’s, the youngest daughter of Sir Ewan Cameron by his third wife, the daughter of the Quaker David Barclay of Urie. Morar was one of the first to greet the Prince when he arrived in Lochnanuagh in July ’45. He served as lieutenant colonel of the Clanranald regiment. When Prince Charles found his way to Morar for shelter in July ’46, the only thing Morar could offer was a cave to sleep in, as his house had been burned down. His reception of the Prince, said to be influenced by young Clanranald, was very cold, leading to fierce criticism from the chief of Mackinnon and a sorrowful reproach from Charles himself. (L. in M., iii. 187.) According to clan historians, Morar was known to be ‘an unmanly, drunken creature all his life.’ (Hist. Cl. Donald, iii. 256.)

Mr. Andrew Lang says that Morar was the author of the Journal and Memorial of P—— C—— Expedition into Scotland (printed in the Lockhart Papers), which is a principal source of knowledge of the early days of the adventure. Mr. Lang did not remember his authority, but was certain of its authenticity. (I had been assured in Moidart that the Journal was by young Ranald of Kinloch-Moidart, but without proof.) Allan of Morar died in 1756. His eldest son, John, was ‘out,’ but in what capacity he served I have failed to trace. Morar’s step-brother, John of Guidale, was a captain in the Clanranald regiment.

Mr. Andrew Lang states that Morar was the author of the Journal and Memorial of P—— C—— Expedition into Scotland (printed in the Lockhart Papers), which is a key source of information about the early days of the adventure. Mr. Lang didn’t recall his source, but he was sure it was genuine. (I had been informed in Moidart that the Journal was written by young Ranald of Kinloch-Moidart, but I have no evidence for that.) Allan of Morar passed away in 1756. His eldest son, John, was ‘out,’ but I haven't been able to find out how he served. Morar’s step-brother, John of Guidale, was a captain in the Clanranald regiment.

Another step-brother was Hugh Macdonald, who had been educated for the Church in France. He was reported to Rome as a ‘scion of one of the noblest branches of the Macdonalds.... He himself is distinguished even more for his zeal and piety than for his honourable birth, and is also a man of singular prudence and modesty.’ (Bellesheim, iv. 386.) He was consecrated Bishop of Diana in partibus in 1731, and appointed vicar-apostolic of the Highlands. The Bishop visited the Prince on board ship on his first arrival, and implored him to return. When the Standard was raised in Glenfinnan it was blessed by Bishop Hugh. What part he took during the campaign I do not know, but after the debacle, he accompanied Lord Lovat in his hiding in Morar. When the fugitives were pounced upon by Ferguson’s party (see post, pp. 90, 244) Lovat was captured, but the Bishop escaped and went to France, in September, along with Prince Charles. He returned to Scotland in 1749, when he had an interview with Bishop Forbes, who veils his identity by calling him ‘Mr. Hugh.’ (L. in M., iii. 50.) He was betrayed in July 1755, and arrested, released on bail, and obliged to reside at Duns until the following February, when he was sentenced by the High Court to perpetual banishment. (Scots. Mag., xvii. 358, xviii. 100.) By connivance of the authorities, the sentence was not enforced, and he remained in Scotland until his death, which occurred in Glengarry in 1773.

Another stepbrother was Hugh Macdonald, who had been educated for the Church in France. He was reported to Rome as a ‘descendant of one of the noblest branches of the Macdonalds.... He is known more for his zeal and piety than for his noble birth and is also recognized as a man of exceptional prudence and modesty.’ (Bellesheim, iv. 386.) He was consecrated Bishop of Diana in partibus in 1731 and appointed vicar-apostolic of the Highlands. The Bishop visited the Prince on board ship when he first arrived and urged him to return. When the Standard was raised in Glenfinnan, it was blessed by Bishop Hugh. I don’t know what role he played during the campaign, but after the defeat, he accompanied Lord Lovat while hiding in Morar. When Ferguson’s party caught the fugitives (see post, pp. 90, 244), Lovat was captured, but the Bishop managed to escape and went to France in September, along with Prince Charles. He returned to Scotland in 1749, where he had a meeting with Bishop Forbes, who disguised his identity by calling him ‘Mr. Hugh.’ (L. in M., iii. 50.) He was betrayed in July 1755 and arrested, but he was released on bail and had to stay in Duns until the following February, when the High Court sentenced him to permanent banishment. (Scots. Mag., xvii. 358, xviii. 100.) Thanks to the authorities looking the other way, the sentence was not enforced, and he stayed in Scotland until his death, which occurred in Glengarry in 1773.

The Kinlochmoidart family descends from the 9th Clanranald (d. 1593). The laird in 1745 was Donald Macdonald; his mother was Margaret Cameron, the only sister of Lochiel of the ’45; his wife was a daughter of Stewart of Appin. Donald, as a boy, had fought at Sheriffmuir. His brother Æneas, a banker in Paris, came over from France with Prince Charles. On arrival in Scotland Æneas was sent to summon the laird. Kinlochmoidart, who was given a commission as colonel and made aide-de-camp to the Prince, was at once despatched to summon his uncle Lochiel, and other Jacobite leaders. Prince Charles lived in his house from August 11th to 18th. When a captive the following year, Kinlochmoidart was asked what made him embark in the adventure, ‘Lord, man’ he replied, ‘what could I do when the young lad came to my house.’ (Carlisle in 1745, p. 266.) It is interesting from the point of view of Highland hospitality to compare this reply with the advice given to Prince Charles by Clanranald’s brother, Boisdale, who had an interview with the Prince at Eriska on his first arrival, but refused to rise. When he found it impossible to dissuade the Prince from his enterprise he ‘insisted that he ought to land on the estate of Macdonald of Sleat or in that of Macleod, for if he trusted himself to them in the beginning they would certainly join him which otherwise they would not do. The Prince would not follow this counsel, being influenced by others.’ (Bishop Geddes’s MS.) Kinlochmoidart was made prisoner at Lesmahagow in Lanarkshire, in November ’45, while returning to the army from an unsuccessful mission to Sir Alexander of Sleat and Macleod. The principal agent in his capture was a divinity student, Thomas Lining, afterwards rewarded with the living of Lesmahagow. The chieftain was tried at Carlisle, and there hanged on 18th October ’46. His head was fixed on the Scots Gate, where it remained for many years. His house was burned down.

The Kinlochmoidart family traces its roots back to the 9th Clanranald (d. 1593). The laird in 1745 was Donald Macdonald; his mother was Margaret Cameron, the only sister of Lochiel of the ’45; his wife was a daughter of Stewart of Appin. As a boy, Donald fought at Sheriffmuir. His brother Æneas, a banker in Paris, came over from France with Prince Charles. Upon arriving in Scotland, Æneas was sent to summon the laird. Kinlochmoidart, who received a commission as colonel and became aide-de-camp to the Prince, was immediately dispatched to summon his uncle Lochiel and other Jacobite leaders. Prince Charles stayed at his house from August 11th to 18th. When captured the following year, Kinlochmoidart was asked what led him to join the adventure, and he replied, “Lord, man, what could I do when the young lad came to my house?” (Carlisle in 1745, p. 266.) It’s interesting from the perspective of Highland hospitality to compare this response with the advice given to Prince Charles by Clanranald’s brother, Boisdale, who met with the Prince at Eriska upon his arrival but refused to stand. When he found it impossible to dissuade the Prince from his venture, he insisted that he should land on the estate of Macdonald of Sleat or that of Macleod, as they would definitely join him if he trusted them at the start, otherwise they wouldn’t. The Prince did not follow this advice, as others influenced him. (Bishop Geddes’s MS.) Kinlochmoidart was captured at Lesmahagow in Lanarkshire in November ’45 while returning to the army from an unsuccessful mission to Sir Alexander of Sleat and Macleod. The main person responsible for his capture was a divinity student, Thomas Lining, who was later rewarded with the living of Lesmahagow. The chieftain was tried at Carlisle and was hanged on October 18th, ’46. His head was displayed on the Scots Gate, where it stayed for many years. His house was burned down.

Kinlochmoidart’s family was deeply implicated in the Rising. Four of his brothers served in Clanranald’s regiment: John, a doctor of medicine, who was one of Ferguson’s victims in the Furness; he afterwards returned to Moidart; Ranald, whose chivalrous championship of the Prince’s cause, gave the first note of enthusiasm to the adventure (Home, Hist. Reb., p. 39); Allan, who fled to France and perished in the Revolution; James, who was captured at Culloden, but escaped; he was exempted from the general pardon, and is supposed to have gone to America. A fifth brother, Æneas the Paris banker, was captured, tried, and sentenced to death. He escaped from Newgate by throwing snuff in the turnkey’s eyes, but being shod with loose slippers he tripped when flying along Warwick Lane and was retaken. He received a conditional pardon, returned to France, and was killed in the Revolution.

Kinlochmoidart’s family was heavily involved in the Rising. Four of his brothers served in Clanranald’s regiment: John, a doctor, who was one of Ferguson’s victims in the Furness; he later returned to Moidart; Ranald, whose brave support for the Prince’s cause sparked the first excitement for the adventure (Home, Hist. Reb., p. 39); Allan, who fled to France and died in the Revolution; James, who was captured at Culloden but managed to escape; he was exempted from the general pardon and is thought to have gone to America. A fifth brother, Æneas the banker in Paris, was captured, tried, and sentenced to death. He escaped from Newgate by throwing snuff in the turnkey’s eyes, but since he was wearing loose slippers, he tripped while running along Warwick Lane and was recaptured. He received a conditional pardon, returned to France, and was killed in the Revolution.

[276] The property was acquired in 1726 by Sir David Murray of Stanhope (Peeblesshire) 2nd bart., the father of John Murray of Broughton. He died in 1729, but the work of developing the lead mines and minerals was carried on by his son, Sir James. In 1745 the proprietor was Sir David Murray, 4th bart., nephew of Sir James, He was ‘out,’ served as aide-de-camp to the Prince, and fought at Falkirk and Culloden. He was captured at Whitby endeavouring to escape; was tried at York; sentenced to death; conditionally pardoned; and died an exile in 1770. The forfeited estate in Ardnamurchan was sold for £33,700.

[276] The property was acquired in 1726 by Sir David Murray of Stanhope (Peeblesshire), the 2nd baronet, who was the father of John Murray of Broughton. He passed away in 1729, but his son, Sir James, continued the work of developing the lead mines and mineral resources. By 1745, the owner was Sir David Murray, the 4th baronet, who was the nephew of Sir James. He was involved in the Jacobite uprising, served as aide-de-camp to the Prince, and fought in the battles of Falkirk and Culloden. He was captured at Whitby while attempting to escape; was tried in York; sentenced to death; conditionally pardoned; and died in exile in 1770. The forfeited estate in Ardnamurchan was sold for £33,700.

[277] Of Torcastle, fourth son of Sir Ewan Cameron. He was attainted. After Culloden he remained in Lochaber, and was agent for distributing money to the Camerons. At the end of ’47 he was still free, having evaded all attempts at capture (Albemarle Papers); of his subsequent career I have no knowledge.

[277] Of Torcastle, the fourth son of Sir Ewan Cameron. He was declared an outlaw. After Culloden, he stayed in Lochaber and was responsible for distributing money to the Camerons. By the end of '47, he was still free, managing to avoid all attempts to capture him (Albemarle Papers); I don't have any information about what happened to him after that.

[278] Sir Hector Maclean of Duart (Mull), 5th bart., who was major of Lord John Drummond’s French regiment of Royal Scots, had been sent from France to Edinburgh in May, and was made prisoner there in June, and removed to London. He was tried for his life, but on proving that he was born in Calais he was treated as a prisoner of war. Charles Maclean of Drimnin (Morvern) joined the Prince after the battle of Falkirk; at Culloden, where Drimnin was killed, his Macleans were formed into a regiment with the Maclachlans, commanded by the chief of Maclachlan. Allan Maclean of Brolas, who succeeded Sir Hector in 1750, as 6th bart., joined the Government side. (Scots Mag., viii. 141.)

[278] Sir Hector Maclean of Duart (Mull), 5th baronet, who was a major in Lord John Drummond’s French regiment of Royal Scots, was sent from France to Edinburgh in May and was captured there in June, then taken to London. He faced a trial for his life, but after proving he was born in Calais, he was treated as a prisoner of war. Charles Maclean of Drimnin (Morvern) joined the Prince after the battle of Falkirk; at Culloden, where Drimnin was killed, his Macleans were organized into a regiment with the Maclachlans, led by the chief of Maclachlan. Allan Maclean of Brolas, who took over from Sir Hector in 1750 as the 6th baronet, sided with the Government. (Scots Mag., viii. 141.)

[279] Lachlan MacLachlan; was commissary general in the Jacobite army; killed at Culloden.

[279] Lachlan MacLachlan was the commissary general in the Jacobite army and was killed at Culloden.

[280] For the Maclean and Maclachlan gentlemen, see Appendix.

[280] For the Maclean and Maclachlan gentlemen, check the Appendix.

[281] Rev. John Maclachlan of Kilchoan, ‘chaplain general of the clans,’ friend and correspondent of Bishop Forbes. Writing to the Bishop in 1748, he says, ‘I live for the most part now like a hermite, because all my late charge almost were kill’d in battle, scatter’d abroad or are cow’d at home. (L. in M., ii. 210.)

[281] Rev. John Maclachlan of Kilchoan, ‘chaplain general of the clans,’ friend and correspondent of Bishop Forbes. Writing to the Bishop in 1748, he says, ‘I mostly live like a hermit now, because almost all my recent congregation were killed in battle, scattered away, or are too scared to come out of their homes. (L. in M., ii. 210.)

[282] Dugald Stewart, 8th chief of Appin and last of the direct male line. Although a Jacobite, and created a peer, as Lord Appin, by James, in 1743, he did not join Prince Charles. His clan, one of the first to rise, was led out by his kinsman Charles Stewart, 5th of Ardshiel. Dugald Stewart sold Appin in 1765, and died 1769.

[282] Dugald Stewart, the 8th chief of Appin and the last of the direct male lineage. Even though he was a Jacobite and was made a lord, as Lord Appin, by James in 1743, he didn't side with Prince Charles. His clan, one of the first to rebel, was led by his relative Charles Stewart, the 5th of Ardshiel. Dugald Stewart sold Appin in 1765 and passed away in 1769.

[283] Alexander Macdonald of Glencoe was attainted; he surrendered some time after Culloden; he was in prison as late as 1750; date of release or of death not ascertained. Two brothers, James and Donald, went out with him in ’45.

[283] Alexander Macdonald of Glencoe was declared an outlaw; he gave himself up sometime after Culloden; he was in jail as late as 1750; the date of his release or death is unknown. Two brothers, James and Donald, joined him in ’45.

[284] Lochiel’s brother, Alexander Cameron, third son of John of Lochiel, joined the Church of Rome, and became a Jesuit. I have failed to trace what part he took during the campaign; but in July 1746 he was arrested at Morar and put on board the Furness, the ship of the notorious Captain Ferguson. Father Cameron was carried to the Thames; he suffered great hardships, and died at Gravesend on board ship. (Albemarle Papers, p. 408; L. in M., i. 312.)

[284] Lochiel’s brother, Alexander Cameron, the third son of John of Lochiel, joined the Catholic Church and became a Jesuit. I haven’t been able to find out what role he played during the campaign, but in July 1746, he was arrested at Morar and put on board the Furness, the ship of the infamous Captain Ferguson. Father Cameron was taken to the Thames; he endured great hardships and died aboard the ship in Gravesend. (Albemarle Papers, p. 408; L. in M., i. 312.)

[285] The last clan battle of importance, known as the Battle of Mulroy, fought in Glenroy, August 1688. The Mackintoshes, who had obtained charters of Keppoch’s country, were ever at feud with Keppoch, who legally owned none of the land his clan occupied. It is said that on this occasion Macdonell of Keppoch (‘Coll of the Cows’) treated his prisoner Mackintosh so kindly that the latter in gratitude offered him a charter of the lands in dispute. Keppoch declined, saying, that he would never consent to hold by sheepskin what he had won by the sword. (Hist. of Clan Donald, ii. 645.) Murray of Broughton, however, states that as the result of this battle Mackintosh granted Keppoch an advantageous lease, which was still running in 1745. (Memorials, p. 443.)

[285] The last major clan battle, known as the Battle of Mulroy, took place in Glenroy in August 1688. The Mackintoshes, who held charters for Keppoch’s territory, were constantly in conflict with Keppoch, who legally owned none of the land his clan inhabited. It is said that during this event, Macdonell of Keppoch (‘Coll of the Cows’) treated his prisoner Mackintosh so well that Mackintosh, in gratitude, offered him a charter for the disputed lands. Keppoch refused, stating that he would never agree to hold something on paper that he had earned with his sword. (Hist. of Clan Donald, ii. 645.) However, Murray of Broughton claims that as a result of this battle, Mackintosh granted Keppoch a favorable lease, which was still active in 1745. (Memorials, p. 443.)

[286] In 1745 the chief of Keppoch, Alexander (son of Coll), was a Protestant. When his clan joined the Prince he refused to allow a favourite priest to accompany it, and in consequence, a number of his people deserted when at Aberchalder. Keppoch had been created a Jacobite baronet in 1743. His death at Culloden has been the theme of much romance. For some late light on the subject, see Mr. Andrew Lang’s Hist. of Scot., iv. 527.

[286] In 1745, the chief of Keppoch, Alexander (son of Coll), was a Protestant. When his clan joined the Prince, he refused to let a favored priest accompany them, which caused several of his people to desert when they were at Aberchalder. Keppoch had been made a Jacobite baronet in 1743. His death at Culloden has inspired a lot of romantic stories. For some recent insights on the topic, check out Mr. Andrew Lang’s Hist. of Scot., iv. 527.

[287] The Grants of Glenmoriston joined the Glengarry regiment.

[287] The Grants of Glenmoriston joined the Glengarry regiment.

[288] Not the eldest son, but the third son, Allan Grant of Innerwick. He was taken prisoner by the Jacobites at the bloodless battle of Dornoch. Lord John Murray’s regiment is the Highland Regiment (Black Watch).

[288] Not the oldest son, but the third son, Allan Grant of Innerwick. He was captured by the Jacobites at the non-violent battle of Dornoch. Lord John Murray’s regiment is the Highland Regiment (Black Watch).

[289] See post, p. 281 et seq.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 281 et seq.

[290] Contrary to what I find is a general impression, the religion of Lord Lovat and his family, as well as his clan, was Protestant. It is true that in his days of outlawry and exile in France, about 1703, Lovat feigned conversion to Romanism, yet from his return to Scotland in ’15, until his capture in ’46, he conformed to the Presbyterian establishment; his bosom friend and crony was the gloomy and dissolute fanatic, James Erskine, Lord Grange. When in hiding after Culloden, along with Bishop Hugh Macdonald, in Loch Morar (see ante, p. 82) Lovat informed the Bishop that he had long been a Catholic in his heart, and wished to be received into the Church. He was preparing to make his confession, but before the rite could be accomplished, the fugitives were dispersed by a party of Campbells and seamen from Ferguson’s ship, and Lord Lovat surrendered a few days later. Though he desired the services of the chaplain of the Sardinian embassy while a prisoner in the Tower, where on one occasion he pronounced himself a Jansenist, and although he declared ‘Je meurs un fils indigne de l’Église Romaine,’ there is no evidence, which I know of, that he ever formally joined that communion.

[290] Contrary to what I think is a common belief, Lord Lovat and his family, as well as his clan, were Protestant. It's true that during his time as an outlaw and exile in France, around 1703, Lovat pretended to convert to Catholicism. However, from his return to Scotland in '15 until his capture in '46, he followed the Presbyterian Church; his close friend was the somber and reckless fanatic, James Erskine, Lord Grange. While hiding after Culloden, along with Bishop Hugh Macdonald, in Loch Morar (see ante, p. 82), Lovat told the Bishop that he had long been a Catholic in his heart and wanted to join the Church. He was getting ready to make his confession when a group of Campbells and sailors from Ferguson’s ship broke up their hiding place, and Lord Lovat surrendered a few days later. Although he wanted the services of the chaplain of the Sardinian embassy while imprisoned in the Tower, where he once identified himself as a Jansenist, and even stated ‘Je meurs un fils indigne de l’Église Romaine,’ there’s no evidence that I know of that he ever officially joined that church.

[291] See post, p. 99.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 99.

[292] Robert Bruce, ordained minister at Edinburgh 1587; Moderator of the Kirk 1588 and 1592, was the son of Bruce of Airth, Stirlingshire, a rude and powerful baron of a family collateral with the royal Bruces. At first Bruce was in high favour with James VI., who placed him on the council of regency when he went to Denmark to be married, 1589, and appointed him to officiate at the coronation of Queen Anne the following year. Subsequently he thwarted the king in his ecclesiastical policy as well as in refusing to acknowledge the guilt of the Earl of Gowrie, who had been his pupil. James had him deposed from his parish, and banished from Edinburgh, 1600. Part of his exile was passed at Inverness (1605-9, and again 1620-24), where he preached to crowded congregations every Sunday. He died at Kinnaird, 1631.

[292] Robert Bruce, ordained minister in Edinburgh in 1587; Moderator of the Kirk in 1588 and 1592, was the son of Bruce of Airth, Stirlingshire, a rough and powerful baron related to the royal Bruces. Initially, Bruce enjoyed great favor with James VI., who appointed him to the council of regency when he traveled to Denmark to get married in 1589 and tasked him with officiating at the coronation of Queen Anne the following year. Later, he opposed the king's ecclesiastical policies and refused to acknowledge the guilt of the Earl of Gowrie, who had been his student. As a result, James had him removed from his parish and exiled from Edinburgh in 1600. Part of his exile was spent in Inverness (1605-09 and again in 1620-24), where he preached to packed congregations every Sunday. He died at Kinnaird in 1631.

[293] See post, p. 104.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 104.

[294] The valley of the Findhorn river, Inverness, Nairn, and Moray shires.

[294] The valley of the Findhorn River, Inverness, Nairn, and Moray shires.

[295] See post, pp. 100, 410.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, pp. 100, 410.

[296] See post, p. 269 et seq.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 269 and following

[297] Now called Strathavon.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Now known as Strathavon.

[298] Duncan Forbes of Culloden; b. 1685; M.P. Inverness-shire 1722; Lord Advocate 1725; Lord President of the Court of Session 1737; d. 1747.

[298] Duncan Forbes of Culloden; b. 1685; M.P. Inverness-shire 1722; Lord Advocate 1725; Lord President of the Court of Session 1737; d. 1747.

[299] George (Mackenzie), 3rd earl; b. about 1702; known as the Master of Macleod until his grandfather’s death, 1714; as Lord Tarbat until his father’s death, 1731, when he succeeded to the earldom. His father, although a friend and cousin of Lord Mar, had not gone out in 1715. The Earl married, 1724, Isabella, daughter of Sir Wm. Gordon of Invergordon, head of a family ‘noted for their zeal for the Protestant succession.’ He was captured at Dunrobin 1746; condemned to death by the House of Lords; released with a conditional pardon 1749; d. at London 1766.

[299] George (Mackenzie), 3rd earl; born around 1702; known as the Master of Macleod until his grandfather died in 1714; as Lord Tarbat until his father passed away in 1731, when he became the earl. His father, despite being a friend and cousin of Lord Mar, did not join the uprising in 1715. The Earl married Isabella in 1724, the daughter of Sir William Gordon of Invergordon, head of a family recognized for their strong support of the Protestant succession. He was captured at Dunrobin in 1746; sentenced to death by the House of Lords; released with a conditional pardon in 1749; died in London in 1766.

[300] John (Mackenzie), Lord Macleod, eldest son of 3rd Earl of Cromartie; b. 1727. Captured along with his father; pled guilty; received a conditional pardon 1748; went abroad 1749; entered the Swedish service when the Old Chevalier, at the request of Lord George Murray, sent him the necessary funds for his military outfit; became colonel, aide-de-camp to the King of Sweden, and Count Cromartie; returned to England 1777; raised a regiment for King George, first known as Macleod’s Highlanders, the 73rd, subsequently the 71st, and to-day the Highland Light Infantry; M.P. for Ross-shire 1780; family estates restored to him 1784; m. 1786, Margery, d. of Lord Forbes; d. s.p. 1789.

[300] John (Mackenzie), Lord Macleod, the oldest son of the 3rd Earl of Cromartie; born in 1727. He was captured along with his father, pleaded guilty, and received a conditional pardon in 1748. He went abroad in 1749, joined the Swedish military after the Old Chevalier sent him the necessary funds for his uniform at the request of Lord George Murray. He became a colonel, aide-de-camp to the King of Sweden, and Count Cromartie. He returned to England in 1777 and raised a regiment for King George, initially known as Macleod’s Highlanders, the 73rd, later the 71st, and now the Highland Light Infantry. He was an M.P. for Ross-shire in 1780, and his family estates were restored to him in 1784. He married Margery, daughter of Lord Forbes, in 1786, and died childless in 1789.

[301] There were three Macdonells all bearing the designation of Barisdale in the ’Forty-five, who are often confused, and who for distinction’s sake may be termed here, Old Barisdale, Young Barisdale, and Youngest Barisdale.

[301] There were three Macdonells all known as Barisdale in '45, who are often mixed up, and for clarity, we'll refer to them as Old Barisdale, Young Barisdale, and Youngest Barisdale.

Old Barisdale was Archibald Macdonell, an uncle of Glengarry and a brother of Scotus. He paid his respects to Prince Charles at Glenfinnan, but took no active part in the Rising, probably being too old to go out. In May 1746, however, his house was burned down by Cumberland’s order, and he was carried prisoner on board a ship of war, but was soon released. He died in 1752.

Old Barisdale was Archibald Macdonell, an uncle of Glengarry and a brother of Scotus. He paid his respects to Prince Charles at Glenfinnan, but didn’t take an active role in the Rising, likely being too old to join in. In May 1746, however, his house was burned down on Cumberland's orders, and he was taken prisoner aboard a warship, but he was released not long after. He passed away in 1752.

Young Barisdale was Archibald’s eldest son, Coll Macdonell, who is a prominent figure in the rising. He was born in 1698. A man of commanding talent, he filled the rôle of Highland cateran to perfection, and raised a following absolutely devoted to him. He became captain of the watch and guardian of the marches for western Inverness-shire, a vocation (similar to that of his great prototype, Rob Roy) which he exercised with rigour and occasional cruelty. He was able to purchase several wadsets, which gave him territorial importance in the western Highlands. He further strengthened his influence in Ross-shire by his marriages, his first wife being a daughter of George Mackenzie of Balmuchie, and his second wife a sister of Alexander Mackenzie, then laird of Fairburn. He joined Prince Charles at Aberchalder on 27th August at the head of Glengarry’s Knoydart men, fought at Prestonpans, and when the Prince went to England he and Angus Macdonell, Glengarry’s second son, were sent back to the Highlands to raise more men. Barisdale greatly disliked his first cousin Lochgarry, who commanded the Glengarry battalion, so he managed to raise a regiment of his own. (Murray’s Mem., pp. 280, 441.) He fought at Falkirk, but was not at Culloden, being absent on service in Ross-shire. In June he was captured and taken prisoner along with his son to Fort Augustus, and there he received a ten days’ protection on condition of giving certain information to Government. For this he was seized by the Jacobites, carried prisoner to France, and confined at St. Malo and Saumur for two years and four months; was not attainted in 1746, but was excluded from the Act of Indemnity in 1747. He returned to Scotland in February 1749, but was again arrested by Government, taken to Edinburgh Castle, and kept a close prisoner without trial until his death, 1st June 1750. A friendly account of this remarkable man will be found in the History of Clan Donald, iii. 337; and an unfriendly one in Mr. Lang’s Companions of Pickle, p. 97.

Young Barisdale was Archibald’s oldest son, Coll Macdonell, who was a key figure in the uprising. He was born in 1698. A man of impressive talent, he perfectly embodied the role of Highland cateran and had a loyal following. He became the captain of the watch and protector of the borders for western Inverness-shire, a position (similar to that of his great predecessor, Rob Roy) which he carried out with strictness and sometimes cruelty. He was able to purchase several wadsets, which gave him significant influence in the western Highlands. He also boosted his power in Ross-shire through his marriages, his first wife being a daughter of George Mackenzie of Balmuchie, and his second wife the sister of Alexander Mackenzie, who was then the laird of Fairburn. He joined Prince Charles at Aberchalder on August 27th at the head of Glengarry’s Knoydart men, fought at Prestonpans, and when the Prince went to England, he and Angus Macdonell, Glengarry’s second son, were sent back to the Highlands to recruit more men. Barisdale strongly disliked his first cousin Lochgarry, who was in charge of the Glengarry battalion, so he managed to form his own regiment. (Murray’s Mem., pp. 280, 441.) He fought at Falkirk but was not present at Culloden since he was away on duty in Ross-shire. In June, he was captured and taken prisoner along with his son to Fort Augustus, where he received ten days’ protection on the condition that he provide certain information to the government. Because of this, he was seized by the Jacobites, taken prisoner to France, and held in St. Malo and Saumur for two years and four months; he was not attainted in 1746 but was excluded from the Act of Indemnity in 1747. He returned to Scotland in February 1749, but was again arrested by the government, taken to Edinburgh Castle, and kept in close confinement without trial until his death on June 1, 1750. A favorable account of this remarkable man can be found in the History of Clan Donald, iii. 337; and an unfavorable one in Mr. Lang’s Companions of Pickle, p. 97.

Youngest Barisdale was Coll’s eldest son, Archibald, who was not quite twenty years old at the beginning of the adventure. He acted as major of the Glengarry regiment. His name was included in the list of attainders in 1746, apparently in mistake for his father. He was made prisoner along with his father in 1746, first by Government and afterwards by the Jacobites; he was carried to France, where he was held in durance for a year. He returned to Scotland, and in 1749 was again imprisoned by Government along with his father, but was immediately released. Once more he was arrested in 1753, at the time when Dr. Archibald Cameron was taken and executed. Barisdale was tried and sentenced to death in March 1754, but reprieved. He was kept a prisoner until 1762, when he was finally released. At his own request he at once took the oath of fealty to Government, and accepted a commission in the 105th Regiment (the Queen’s Own Royal Highlanders), which was disbanded the following year. He died at Barisdale in 1787.

Youngest Barisdale was Coll’s eldest son, Archibald, who was not yet twenty years old at the start of the adventure. He served as the major of the Glengarry regiment. His name was mistakenly included in the list of attainders in 1746, likely confused with his father's. He was captured along with his father in 1746, first by the Government and later by the Jacobites; he was taken to France, where he was imprisoned for a year. He returned to Scotland, and in 1749 he was again jailed by the Government along with his father, but was released immediately. He was arrested once more in 1753, during the time when Dr. Archibald Cameron was captured and executed. Barisdale was tried and sentenced to death in March 1754, but his sentence was suspended. He remained a prisoner until 1762, when he was finally freed. At his own request, he immediately took an oath of loyalty to the Government and accepted a commission in the 105th Regiment (the Queen’s Own Royal Highlanders), which was disbanded the following year. He died at Barisdale in 1787.

[302] Captain in Cromartie’s regiment; was captured at Dunrobin; tried at Southwark in 1746, pleaded guilty and was condemned to death; he was not executed; I am ignorant of his subsequent career.

[302] Captain in Cromartie’s regiment; was captured at Dunrobin; tried at Southwark in 1746, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to death; he was not executed; I do not know what happened to him after that.

[303] Simon Fraser, b. 1726: after Culloden gave himself up to Government; attainted 1746, pardoned 1750; joined the Scottish bar 1752; acted as Advocate-Depute in the Appin murder trial, an episode immortalised in R. L. Stevenson’s Catriona; raised a Highland regiment for the Government 1757, and served with it under Wolfe in Canada (regiment disbanded 1763); M.P. Inverness 1761; family estates restored to him 1774; raised a second regiment of two battalions 1775, for the American War, which he did not accompany (regiment disbanded 1783); died a lieut.-general 1782. Sir Walter Scott calls the Master of Lovat the good son of a bad father. A very different account is given by Mrs. Grant of Laggan—‘he differed from his father only as a chain’d-up fox does from one at liberty.’ (See Wariston’s Diary, etc., p. 275, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxvi.)

[303] Simon Fraser, born in 1726: after the Battle of Culloden, he surrendered to the government; he was declared an outlaw in 1746 but received a pardon in 1750; he joined the Scottish bar in 1752; he served as Advocate-Depute in the Appin murder trial, a story famously depicted in R. L. Stevenson’s Catriona; he formed a Highland regiment for the government in 1757 and served with it under Wolfe in Canada (the regiment was disbanded in 1763); he became an M.P. for Inverness in 1761; his family estates were restored to him in 1774; he raised a second regiment of two battalions in 1775 for the American War, which he did not join (the regiment was disbanded in 1783); he died as a lieutenant-general in 1782. Sir Walter Scott refers to the Master of Lovat as the good son of a bad father. A very different perspective is provided by Mrs. Grant of Laggan—"he differed from his father only as a chained-up fox does from one at liberty." (See Wariston’s Diary, etc., p. 275, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxvi.)

[304] Charles Fraser the younger, b. 1725, nephew and heir-presumptive of William Fraser of Inverallochy, Aberdeenshire, the senior cadet of Lovat’s clan.

[304] Charles Fraser the younger, born in 1725, is the nephew and likely heir of William Fraser of Inverallochy, Aberdeenshire, who is the senior cadet of Lovat's clan.

His father, Charles Fraser of Castle Fraser, younger brother of the laird of Inverallochy, had inherited the property of Muchall or Castle Fraser (Kemnay, Aberdeenshire), on the death of his step-grandfather Charles, 4th and last Lord Fraser, who lost his life near Banff by falling over a precipice while in hiding to avoid capture after the ’15. In 1723 the elder Charles Fraser was created ‘Lord Fraser of Mushall’ by the Chevalier in recognition of his services, and particularly those of his father, ‘who died bravely asserting our cause, and in consideration of the earnest desire of the late Lord Fraser, when we were last in Scotland, to resign his titles of honour in favour of the said Charles’ father.’ I am not aware of what these special services were, nor why the elder brother William was passed over both for the Castle Fraser inheritance and the Jacobite peerage. Charles Fraser eventually succeeded to Inverallochy in 1749 on the death of his brother William. He was probably too old to go out in 1745, and his son went out as Lovat’s lieut.-colonel, ‘in accordance with the ancient highland practice and the policy of Lord Lovat as being nearest in blood to the chiefship.’ Young Inverallochy was killed at Culloden, and the story of his death is very painful. It is first told in a general way in The Lyon (ii. 305; iii. 56), and afterwards with more detail by Sir Henry Seton Steuart of Allanton in the Antijacobin Review of 1802 (p. 125) as follows:—

His father, Charles Fraser of Castle Fraser, the younger brother of the laird of Inverallochy, inherited the estate of Muchall or Castle Fraser (Kemnay, Aberdeenshire) after the death of his step-grandfather Charles, the 4th and last Lord Fraser. He died near Banff after falling over a cliff while hiding to avoid capture after the ’15. In 1723, the elder Charles Fraser was made ‘Lord Fraser of Mushall’ by the Chevalier in recognition of his services, especially those of his father, ‘who died bravely defending our cause, and in consideration of the late Lord Fraser’s sincere wish when we were last in Scotland to give up his titles in favor of Charles’ father.’ I’m not sure what these specific services were, or why the elder brother William was overlooked for both the Castle Fraser inheritance and the Jacobite peerage. Charles Fraser eventually inherited Inverallochy in 1749 after his brother William died. He was probably too old to fight in 1745, and his son served as Lovat’s lieutenant-colonel, ‘in line with the traditional Highland practices and the strategy of Lord Lovat since he was closest in blood to the chiefship.’ Young Inverallochy was killed at Culloden, and the story of his death is deeply tragic. It is first mentioned in a general sense in The Lyon (ii. 305; iii. 56), and then in more detail by Sir Henry Seton Steuart of Allanton in the Antijacobin Review of 1802 (p. 125) as follows:—

‘When the celebrated General Wolfe (at this period a lieut.-colonel in the army) was riding over the field of battle with the D—— of C-m-b-l-d, they observed a Highlander, who, though severely wounded, was yet able to sit up, and, leaning on his arm, seemed to smile defiance of them.—“Wolfe,” said the D——, “shoot me that Highland scoundrel, who thus dares to look on us with such contempt and insolence!”—“My commission,” replied the manly officer, “is at your R——l H——s’s disposal, but I never can consent to become an executioner.” The Highlander, it is probable, was soon knocked on the head by some ruffian less scrupulous than the future conqueror of Quebec. But it was remarked by those who heard the story, that Colonel Wolfe, from that day, visibly declined in the favour and confidence of the commander-in-chief. We believe that some officers are still alive who are not unacquainted with this anecdote.’

When the famous General Wolfe (at that time a lieutenant colonel in the army) was riding across the battlefield with the Duke of Cumberland, they spotted a Highlander who, though seriously injured, was still able to sit up and, propping himself on his arm, seemed to smile defiantly at them. “Wolfe,” said the Duke, “shoot that Highland scoundrel who dares to look at us with such contempt and insolence!” “My commission,” replied the brave officer, “is at your Royal Highness’s disposal, but I can never agree to become an executioner.” It’s likely that the Highlander was soon killed by some thug less scrupulous than the future conqueror of Quebec. However, those who heard the story noted that Colonel Wolfe visibly lost favor and trust from the commander-in-chief after that day. We believe there are still some officers around who are familiar with this anecdote.

Mr. Beckles Willson, Wolfe’s latest biographer, accepts the story as regards Wolfe but doubts its applicability to Cumberland. Wolfe, it must be remembered, was on Hawley’s staff, not Cumberland’s. These generals could easily have been mistaken for each other. The action is very like Hawley, who was hated by the soldiers, who nicknamed him the Hangman, and who held his military talents in contempt, a feeling shared by Wolfe. Moreover, it was a Jacobite cult to vilify the Duke, and to impute all cruelties to him personally. Seton Steuart was not an entirely unprejudiced writer; he had been brought up in an atmosphere of uncompromising Jacobitism. He was a cousin of Sir James Steuart of Goodtrees and of Provost Stewart of Edinburgh, both of whom suffered; while his wife was grand-daughter of Charles Smith of Boulogne, the Jacobite agent frequently mentioned in Murray’s Papers. (See ante, p. 11.)

Mr. Beckles Willson, Wolfe’s latest biographer, accepts the story regarding Wolfe but questions its relevance to Cumberland. It’s important to note that Wolfe was part of Hawley’s staff, not Cumberland’s. These generals could easily have been confused with each other. The action is very similar to Hawley, who was disliked by the soldiers, earning him the nickname the Hangman, and his military skills were looked down upon, a sentiment shared by Wolfe. Additionally, there was a Jacobite effort to vilify the Duke and attribute all cruelties to him personally. Seton Steuart wasn't completely unbiased; he grew up in a staunchly Jacobite environment. He was a cousin of Sir James Steuart of Goodtrees and Provost Stewart of Edinburgh, both of whom faced hardships; while his wife was the granddaughter of Charles Smith of Boulogne, the Jacobite agent frequently mentioned in Murray’s Papers. (See ante, p. 11.)

[305] James Fraser, 9th of Foyers (Lochness), descended from the 3rd Lord Lovat, was one of the most ruthless and devoted henchmen of Lovat, who made him bailie of Stratherrick. He received from Prince Charles a special commission, dated 23rd September 1745, to seize President Duncan Forbes and carry him prisoner to Edinburgh, an enterprise which failed. His name was excluded from the act of indemnity, but he was afterwards pardoned and his estates restored. It was to his house that John Murray of Broughton was carried the day before Culloden.

[305] James Fraser, 9th of Foyers (Lochness), a descendant of the 3rd Lord Lovat, was one of Lovat's most ruthless and dedicated enforcers, who appointed him bailie of Stratherrick. He received a special commission from Prince Charles on September 23, 1745, to capture President Duncan Forbes and bring him to Edinburgh, but this mission failed. His name was left out of the act of indemnity, but he was later pardoned and had his estates returned. It was to his house that John Murray of Broughton was taken the day before Culloden.

[306] N.B.—Most of the Chisholms are Papists.

[306] N.B.—Most of the Chisholms are Catholics.

[307] This does not quite accord with the clan history. Roderick, the chief of Chisholm, was then forty-eight years old. What part he took in the Rising is not on record, but he was specially excluded from the act of indemnity. His eldest son Alexander seems to have stayed at home; his second and third sons were officers in the Government army, and fought under Cumberland at Culloden; his fourth son, who was a physician in Inverness, afterwards provost, seems to have taken no part; his youngest son, Roderick Og, led out the clan; he ‘headed about eighty of the Chisholms at the battle of Culloden, himself and thirty thereof were killed upon the field.’ (Mackenzie, Hist. of the Chisholms.)

[307] This doesn't quite match the clan's history. Roderick, the chief of Chisholm, was forty-eight years old at that time. There's no record of his involvement in the Rising, but he was specifically excluded from the act of indemnity. His eldest son, Alexander, appears to have stayed at home; his second and third sons served as officers in the Government army and fought under Cumberland at Culloden. His fourth son, who was a physician in Inverness and later became provost, seems to have played no part. His youngest son, Roderick Og, led the clan; he commanded about eighty Chisholms at the battle of Culloden, and he and thirty others were killed on the battlefield. (Mackenzie, Hist. of the Chisholms.)

[308] The laird was then Alexander Mackenzie, 6th of Fairburn. According to the Marquis d’Éguilles, French envoy to Prince Charles, Fairburn’s wife was Barbara Gordon, of whom he gives the following account in a despatch to his government: ‘Une fort jolie personne ... celle-cy n’a pas banni son mari; mais malgré luy, elle a vendu ses diamants et sa vaisselle pour lever des hommes. Elle a ramassé cent cinquante des plus braves du païs, qu’elle a joint à ceux de miladi Seaforth, sous la conduite de son beau-frère.’ (Cottin, Un Protégé de Bachaumont, p. 51.) The brother-in-law may be Coll Macdonell of Barisdale, who married her husband’s sister; or it may be Kenneth Mackenzie her husband’s brother who although only a schoolboy was a captain in Barisdale’s regiment. (Lord Rosebery’s List of Persons Concerned in the Rebellion, p. 76.) This lady is not mentioned in the genealogies of Alex. Mackenzie’s Hist. of the Mackenzies, which are, however, manifestly incomplete.

[308] At that time, the laird was Alexander Mackenzie, 6th of Fairburn. According to the Marquis d’Éguilles, a French envoy to Prince Charles, Fairburn’s wife was Barbara Gordon. He provided the following account in a dispatch to his government: ‘A very pretty person ... she did not abandon her husband; but despite him, she sold her diamonds and silverware to raise troops. She gathered one hundred and fifty of the bravest from the region, who joined those of Lady Seaforth, under the leadership of her brother-in-law.’ (Cottin, Un Protégé de Bachaumont, p. 51.) The brother-in-law could be Coll Macdonell of Barisdale, who married her husband’s sister; or it may be Kenneth Mackenzie, her husband’s brother, who, although just a schoolboy, was a captain in Barisdale’s regiment. (Lord Rosebery’s List of Persons Concerned in the Rebellion, p. 76.) This lady is not mentioned in the genealogies of Alex. Mackenzie’s Hist. of the Mackenzies, which are, however, clearly incomplete.

[309] Alexander Macgillivray of Dunmaglas, the lieut.-colonel of Lady Mackintosh’s regiment, and Gillise Macbain, Dalmagarrie, the major, were both killed at Culloden.

[309] Alexander Macgillivray of Dunmaglas, the lieutenant colonel of Lady Mackintosh’s regiment, and Gillise Macbain, Dalmagarrie, the major, were both killed at Culloden.

[310] N.B.—The Laird of McIntosh got a Company in the Highland Regiment. He raised a full company and they all deserted except 8 or 9.

[310] Note:—The Laird of McIntosh formed a Company in the Highland Regiment. He managed to raise a full company, but almost all of them deserted, leaving only 8 or 9 behind.

[311] Anne, daughter of James Farquharson, 9th of Invercauld, and Margaret Murray, daughter of Lord James Murray, an uncle of Lord George Murray; b. 1723; d. 1787; m. Æneas Mackintosh 22nd of Mackintosh, who, though a Jacobite peer, refused to join Prince Charles, preferring to serve that monarch who was able to pay him ‘half-a-guinea the day and half-a-guinea the morn.’ (Notes to Waverley, ch. xix.) The chief raised a company for King George with the result noted above, while his lady raised the clan for Prince Charles. Of this lady we get the following enthusiastic account by the Marquis d’Éguilles:—

[311] Anne, daughter of James Farquharson, 9th of Invercauld, and Margaret Murray, daughter of Lord James Murray, an uncle of Lord George Murray; born in 1723; died in 1787; married Æneas Mackintosh, 22nd of Mackintosh, who, although a Jacobite lord, chose not to support Prince Charles, instead opting to serve the monarch who could pay him ‘half-a-guinea today and half-a-guinea tomorrow.’ (Notes to Waverley, ch. xix.) The chief formed a company for King George with the results mentioned above, while his wife rallied the clan for Prince Charles. We have the following enthusiastic account of this lady from the Marquis d’Éguilles:—

‘Elle aimoit éperdûment son mari qu’elle espéra longtems de gagner au Prince; mais, ayant appris qu’il s’étoit enfin engagé, avec le Président, à servir la maison d’Hanovre, elle ne voulut plus le voir.

‘She loved her husband deeply, hoping for a long time to win him over to the Prince; but, having learned that he had finally committed himself, along with the President, to serve the House of Hanover, she no longer wanted to see him.

‘Elle ne s’en tint pas là: elle souleva une partie de ses vassaux, à la teste desquels elle mit un très-beau cousin qui, jusques-là, l’avoit aimée inutilement. Mackintosh fut obligé de quitter son lit, sa maison et ses terres. L’intrépide ladi, un pistolet d’une main et de l’argent de l’autre, parcourt le païs, menace, donne, promet, et, en moins de quinze jours, ramasse 600 hommes. Elle en avoit envoyé moitié à Fakirk, qui y arriva la veille de la bataille. Elle avoit retenu l’autre moitié pour se garder de son mari et de Loudoun qui, à Inverness, n’étoient qu’à trois lieues de son château. Le prince logea chez elle, à son passage. Elle s’offrit à luy avec la grâce et la noblesse d’une divinité, car rien n’est si beau que cette femme. Elle luy présenta toute sa petite armée qu’elle avoit rassemblée, et après avoir parlé aux soldats de ce qu’ils devoient à la situation, aux droits et aux vertus de leur Prince, elle jura très-catégoriquement de casser la tête au premier qui s’en tourneroit, après avoir, à ses yeux, brûlé sa maison et chassé sa famille.

‘She didn’t stop there: she rallied a part of her vassals, at the head of whom she placed a very handsome cousin who, until then, had loved her in vain. Mackintosh was forced to leave his bed, his home, and his land. The fearless lady, with a pistol in one hand and money in the other, traveled the country, threatening, giving, promising, and in less than fifteen days, gathered 600 men. She sent half to Falkirk, who arrived there the day before the battle. She kept the other half to protect herself from her husband and Loudoun who, in Inverness, were only three leagues from her castle. The prince stayed with her during his passage. She offered herself to him with the grace and nobility of a goddess, for nothing is as beautiful as this woman. She presented him her little army that she had assembled, and after speaking to the soldiers about what they owed to the situation, the rights and virtues of their Prince, she swore very emphatically to smash the head of the first who would turn away, after having, in her eyes, burned her house and driven out her family.

‘Au reste, elle a toujours passé, jusques icy, pour être très-modérée, très-sensée. C’est, icy, l’effet de la première éducation. Son père, pris à la bataille de Preston en 1715, avoit resté longtems prisonnier, et couru risque de la vie. Elle n’a pas vingt-deux ans. C’est elle qui découvrit le projet qu’avoit fait Macleod d’enlever le Prince, et, en vérité, c’est elle seule qui l’a fait échouer.’ (Cottin, p. 49.)

‘Besides, she has always been considered very moderate and very sensible until now. This is the result of her early upbringing. Her father, captured at the Battle of Preston in 1715, was long imprisoned and risked his life. She is not yet twenty-two years old. She was the one who uncovered Macleod's plan to abduct the Prince, and, in truth, she alone brought it to failure.’ (Cottin, p. 49.)

The last sentence refers to the incident known as ‘the Rout of Moy’ (post, p. 108), when Lady Mackintosh’s thoughtful vigilance saved her Prince from imminent risk of capture. A month later (March 20th) her husband was taken prisoner at Dornoch by the Jacobites. Prince Charles sent the chief to his wife at Moy, saying that ‘he could not be in better security or more honourably treated.’ This may have been the occasion of the story told by Bishop Mackintosh to Chambers: the lady was jocularly known in the army as ‘Colonel Anne’; when her husband was ushered into her presence she greeted him laconically with, ‘Your servant, captain,’ to which he replied with equal brevity, ‘Your servant, colonel!’ After Culloden Lady Mackintosh was arrested at Moy and taken to Inverness; she was released after six weeks’ confinement. In spite of her martial reputation, and her undaunted resolution, there was nothing masculine about her appearance; she was a slender, rather delicate-looking girl: she took no part in the fighting but remained at home during the campaign. In after years when in London, family tradition says that she became a favourite in certain royal circles, and there on one occasion she met the Duke of Cumberland, and with him she exchanged some piquant raillery (see narratives in A. M. Shaw’s Mackintoshes and Clan Chattan, p. 464 seq.).

The last sentence refers to the event known as 'the Rout of Moy' (post, p. 108), when Lady Mackintosh’s keen awareness saved her Prince from the risk of being captured. A month later (March 20th), her husband was taken prisoner at Dornoch by the Jacobites. Prince Charles sent the chief to his wife at Moy, saying that ‘he could not be in better security or more honorably treated.’ This may have sparked the story told by Bishop Mackintosh to Chambers: the lady was playfully known in the army as ‘Colonel Anne’; when her husband was brought into her presence, she curtly greeted him with, ‘Your servant, captain,’ to which he replied just as briefly, ‘Your servant, colonel!’ After Culloden, Lady Mackintosh was arrested at Moy and taken to Inverness; she was released after six weeks in confinement. Despite her martial reputation and unwavering determination, there was nothing masculine about her appearance; she was a slender, rather delicate-looking young woman: she did not take part in the fighting but stayed at home during the campaign. In later years, while in London, family tradition claims that she became a favorite in certain royal circles, and there, on one occasion, she met the Duke of Cumberland, and they exchanged some witty banter (see narratives in A. M. Shaw’s Mackintoshes and Clan Chattan, p. 464 seq.).

[312] Culcairn, now called Kincraig, in Rosskeen parish. George Munro, b. 1685, brother of Sir Robert Munro of Foulis (see post, p. 198). Culcairn was shot in Knoydart in August 1746 while wasting the country and carrying off cattle in company with Captain Grant of Knockando, of Loudoun’s Regiment. It is said he was shot by accident instead of Grant, by the father of one Alexander Cameron, whom Grant had shot a short time previously. (L. in M., i. 91, 312.)

[312] Culcairn, now known as Kincraig, in Rosskeen parish. George Munro, born in 1685, was the brother of Sir Robert Munro of Foulis (see post, p. 198). Culcairn was shot in Knoydart in August 1746 while looting the area and stealing cattle alongside Captain Grant of Knockando from Loudoun’s Regiment. It's said he was accidentally shot instead of Grant, by the father of one Alexander Cameron, whom Grant had killed a short time earlier. (L. in M., i. 91, 312.)

[313] Cf. ante, p. 46 n.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Cf. see above, p. 46 note.

[314] Kenneth (Mackenzie), eldest son of William, 5th Earl of Seaforth, attainted 1716, d. 1740; but for the attainder he would have been 6th earl. He was styled Lord Fortrose, which was the second Jacobite title of his grandfather, created Marquis of Seaforth by James VII. after his abdication. He was born about 1718; M.P. for Inverness 1741-47; and for Ross-shire from 1747 until his death, 1761. Lord Fortrose (who was generally, though not officially, called Seaforth in Scotland) adhered to Government in the ’45. Though his support was of the paltriest description, his defection gave great pain to Prince Charles. Fortrose’s wife was Lady Mary Stewart, daughter of the 6th Earl of Galloway. This lady raised men for Prince Charles, with the result narrated in these pages. Of her the French envoy informs his Government: ‘On assure que son zèle égale celuy des deux autres [Lady Mackintosh and Mrs. Mackenzie of Fairburn], quoy qu’elle paroisse moins vive et moins courageuse.’ It was their son who raised the 1st Battalion Seaforth Highlanders (72nd), for which service he was created Earl of Seaforth in the Peerage of Ireland.

[314] Kenneth (Mackenzie), the eldest son of William, 5th Earl of Seaforth, was declared illegitimate in 1716 and died in 1740; if not for that declaration, he would have been the 6th earl. He was known as Lord Fortrose, which was the second Jacobite title of his grandfather, who was made Marquis of Seaforth by James VII. after his abdication. He was born around 1718; served as Member of Parliament for Inverness from 1741 to 1747; and for Ross-shire from 1747 until his death in 1761. Lord Fortrose (who was generally, though not officially, referred to as Seaforth in Scotland) supported the Government during the ’45. Although his support was minimal, his decision to switch sides greatly upset Prince Charles. Fortrose’s wife was Lady Mary Stewart, the daughter of the 6th Earl of Galloway. She recruited men for Prince Charles, leading to the events described in these pages. Of her, the French envoy informed his government: ‘It is said that her zeal equals that of the other two [Lady Mackintosh and Mrs. Mackenzie of Fairburn], although she appears less lively and less courageous.’ Their son raised the 1st Battalion Seaforth Highlanders (72nd), for which service he was made Earl of Seaforth in the Peerage of Ireland.

[315] The Rosses of Ross-shire are rather mixed up here. At this time there were two distinct races of Ross in the county, which should not be confounded. The Celtic family of Ross, of whom the ancient head was the Earl of Ross, was originally known as the clan Ghille-andrais (servants of St. Andrew). The earldom passed by marriage of heiresses in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, first to the Leslies and afterwards to the Macdonalds, Lords of the Isles. The chiefship of the clan, however, went to the heir male, Ross of Balnagowan. In the year 1711, David Ross, the last of the Celtic family of Balnagowan, died. The natural heir was Ross of Pitcalnie, his next of kin. Pitcalnie was a Roman Catholic or Episcopalian, anyhow he was not a Presbyterian, and Balnagowan was influenced by his wife, Lady Anne (daughter of the 4th Earl of Moray), a bigoted Presbyterian, to disinherit the natural heir and bequeath the property to General the Hon. Charles Ross, a younger son of George, 11th Lord Ross of Halkhead, in Ayrshire. (Fraser-Mackintosh, Antiq. Notes, p. 66.) The family which thus became Ross of Balnagowan had no connection with the Celtic clan of the same name, but was descended from a Norman family named de Ros. In 1745 Balnagowan with its great territorial influence had come to George, 13th Lord Ross, and the Master of Ross his eldest son (afterwards 14th and last Lord Ross) received the command of one of the independent companies raised in 1745. He was garrisoning Inverness Castle (then called Fort George) when it was captured by the Jacobites, 20th Feb. ’46; he remained a prisoner on parole until the end of the campaign. He was one of the very few officers who did not break his parole. (Cf. post, pp. 207, 364.)

[315] The Rosses of Ross-shire are a bit mixed up here. At this time, there were two distinct groups of Ross in the county that should not be confused. The Celtic family of Ross, whose ancient leader was the Earl of Ross, was originally known as the clan Ghille-andrais (servants of St. Andrew). The earldom transferred through marriage to heiresses in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, first to the Leslies and then to the Macdonalds, Lords of the Isles. However, the leadership of the clan went to the male heir, Ross of Balnagowan. In 1711, David Ross, the last of the Celtic family of Balnagowan, passed away. The natural heir was Ross of Pitcalnie, his closest relative. Pitcalnie was a Roman Catholic or Episcopalian—he wasn’t a Presbyterian for sure—and Balnagowan was influenced by his wife, Lady Anne (the daughter of the 4th Earl of Moray), who was a fervent Presbyterian, to disinherit the natural heir and leave the property to General the Hon. Charles Ross, a younger son of George, 11th Lord Ross of Halkhead in Ayrshire. (Fraser-Mackintosh, Antiq. Notes, p. 66.) The family that became Ross of Balnagowan had no connection to the Celtic clan with the same name but descended from a Norman family named de Ros. By 1745, Balnagowan, with its significant territorial influence, had come to George, 13th Lord Ross, and his eldest son, the Master of Ross (who later became the 14th and last Lord Ross), received command of one of the independent companies raised in 1745. He was garrisoning Inverness Castle (then known as Fort George) when it was captured by the Jacobites on February 20, 1746; he remained a prisoner on parole until the end of the campaign. He was one of the very few officers who didn’t break his parole. (Cf. post, pp. 207, 364.)

The Rosses of Inverchasley and Pitcalnie, who belonged to the ancient Celtic clan Ghille-andrais, sided with the Government, but ‘young Pitcalnie,’ Malcolm Ross, who was a grand-nephew of President Duncan Forbes, went over to the Jacobites. He had served as ensign in Loudoun’s regiment at Prestonpans, where he was taken prisoner by the Jacobites and released on parole. He seems to have been the only Government officer who deserted to the Jacobites. His name was included in the list of attainders.

The Ross family from Inverchasley and Pitcalnie, who were part of the ancient Celtic clan Ghille-andrais, supported the Government, but 'young Pitcalnie,' Malcolm Ross, a grand-nephew of President Duncan Forbes, joined the Jacobites. He had served as an ensign in Loudoun’s regiment at Prestonpans, where he was captured by the Jacobites and released on parole. He appears to be the only Government officer who switched sides to the Jacobites. His name was included in the list of attainders.

[316] Macleod of Geanies was representative of the Macleods of Assynt (see ante, p. 74). John, a brother of Neil Macleod (tried for the betrayal of Montrose), left Assynt and settled in Easter Ross where his son Donald, an officer in the Scots Brigade in Holland, purchased the estate of Geanies. Donald’s son Hugh was laird in 1745; his wife was a niece of President Duncan Forbes of Culloden.

[316] Macleod of Geanies represented the Macleods of Assynt (see ante, p. 74). John, a brother of Neil Macleod (who was tried for betraying Montrose), left Assynt and moved to Easter Ross, where his son Donald, an officer in the Scots Brigade in Holland, bought the estate of Geanies. Donald’s son Hugh was the laird in 1745; his wife was a niece of President Duncan Forbes of Culloden.

[317] See post, p. 143 et seq.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 143 et seq.

[318] This refers to the fiasco known as the ‘Rout of Moy’ (16th Feb. ’46), when by a stratagem, a blacksmith and a few other retainers of Lady Mackintosh, made Loudoun believe that the whole Jacobite army was upon him; he fled back to Inverness, whence he retreated across the Kessock Ferry to Ross-shire. The principal, perhaps the only, victim of the expedition, was Donald Ban MacCrimmon, Macleod’s famous piper, who was shot by the blacksmith. Cf. post, p. 145. (For details, see Home, Hist. Reb., ch. ix.; L. in M., 149, etc.)

[318] This refers to the disaster known as the ‘Rout of Moy’ (Feb 16, ’46), when a blacksmith and a few others loyal to Lady Mackintosh tricked Loudoun into thinking that the entire Jacobite army was coming for him; he fled back to Inverness and then retreated across the Kessock Ferry to Ross-shire. The main, possibly the only, casualty of the event was Donald Ban MacCrimmon, Macleod’s famous piper, who was shot by the blacksmith. Cf. post, p. 145. (For details, see Home, Hist. Reb., ch. ix.; L. in M., 149, etc.)

[319] George Grant of Culbin, brother of Sir James Grant of Grant, major in the Highland Regiment (Black Watch). He surrendered Inverness Castle (then called Fort George) to Prince Charles, 20th February, for which he was subsequently tried by court-martial, and dismissed the service.

[319] George Grant of Culbin, brother of Sir James Grant of Grant, major in the Highland Regiment (Black Watch). He handed over Inverness Castle (then known as Fort George) to Prince Charles on February 20th, for which he was later tried by court-martial and dismissed from service.

[320] See ante, p. 75.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See ante, p. 75.

[321] Now called Strathavon (pronounced Stratha’an), Banffshire. It is generally called Strathdawn or Strathdown in documents of this date; perhaps from the local pronunciation, plus the archaic ‘d’ which occasionally appears in place-names, e.g. Strathdearn for the valley of the Earn or Findhorn. There was an ancient church of Dounan in the valley perhaps from the same root.

[321] Now known as Strathavon (pronounced Stratha’an), Banffshire. It's commonly referred to as Strathdawn or Strathdown in documents from this time, likely due to the local pronunciation, along with the old-fashioned ‘d’ that sometimes appears in place names, e.g. Strathdearn for the valley of the Earn or Findhorn. There was an ancient church of Dounan in the valley, possibly from the same origin.

[322] George Forbes of Skeleter; m. Glenbucket’s daughter Christiana Gordon. He escaped to France after Culloden, joined Lord Ogilvie’s Scots regiment in the French service: he never returned.

[322] George Forbes of Skeleter; married Glenbucket’s daughter Christiana Gordon. He fled to France after Culloden and joined Lord Ogilvie’s Scottish regiment in the French army; he never came back.

[323] William (Duff) of Braco and Dipple; b. 1697; d. 1763; M.P. Banffshire 1727-34; created Baron Braco of Kilbride 1735; and in 1759 Viscount Macduff and Earl Fife—all these titles being in the peerage of Ireland; m. (1) Janet, d. of 4th Earl of Findlater; and (2) Jean, d. of Sir James Grant of Grant. He, his father, and his grandfather made enormous purchases of land in Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray shires, particularly on the forfeitures after Mar’s rising in 1715. He joined Cumberland in 1746.

[323] William (Duff) of Braco and Dipple; born 1697; died 1763; Member of Parliament for Banffshire from 1727 to 1734; made Baron Braco of Kilbride in 1735; and in 1759 became Viscount Macduff and Earl Fife—all these titles being in the peerage of Ireland; married (1) Janet, daughter of the 4th Earl of Findlater; and (2) Jean, daughter of Sir James Grant of Grant. He, along with his father and grandfather, acquired large amounts of land in Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray shires, especially from the land forfeitures after Mar’s rising in 1715. He joined Cumberland in 1746.

[324] Among the Jacobite prisoners who pled guilty is ‘Robert Forbes, printer, son to New.’ (Scots Mag., viii. p. 438.) At his trial it is stated that he was a farmer. His home was at Corse in the parish of Coull, Deeside. He was captain in one of Lord Lewis Gordon’s battalions, and was one of the officers left at Carlisle and captured there. He was sentenced to death but was not executed; of his subsequent career I have no knowledge.

[324] Among the Jacobite prisoners who admitted guilt is ‘Robert Forbes, printer, son of New.’ (Scots Mag., viii. p. 438.) At his trial, it was mentioned that he was a farmer. He lived in Corse in the parish of Coull, Deeside. He served as a captain in one of Lord Lewis Gordon’s battalions and was one of the officers left behind at Carlisle, where he was captured. He was sentenced to death but was not executed; I have no information about his life afterwards.

[325] Cope reached Aberdeen 11th Sept., and left it by sea 15th Sept. 1745.

[325] Cope arrived in Aberdeen on September 11th and departed by sea on September 15th, 1745.

[326] Johnshaven, a fishing port on the Kincardine coast, about twenty-five miles south of Aberdeen; Torry and Foothy (Footdee), fishing villages near the mouth of the Dee, Aberdeen.

[326] Johnshaven, a fishing port on the Kincardine coast, about twenty-five miles south of Aberdeen; Torry and Footdee, fishing villages near the mouth of the River Dee in Aberdeen.

[327] James Moir of Stonywood, an estate on Donside three miles above Aberdeen. He was very active in the Jacobite cause, and while the Prince was in England raised a battalion, of which Lord Lewis Gordon was titular colonel. After Culloden he escaped to Sweden, where he resided until 1762, when he was permitted to return to Stonywood. He died in 1782. His correspondence in 1745-46 is printed in the Spalding Club Misc., vol. i.

[327] James Moir of Stonywood, an estate on Donside three miles above Aberdeen. He was very involved in the Jacobite cause, and while the Prince was in England, he raised a battalion, with Lord Lewis Gordon as the nominal colonel. After Culloden, he escaped to Sweden, where he lived until 1762, when he was allowed to return to Stonywood. He died in 1782. His correspondence from 1745-46 is printed in the Spalding Club Misc., vol. i.

[328] York Street cadys = messenger-porters of a low street in Aberdeen.

[328] York Street cadys = messenger-porters of a lower-class street in Aberdeen.

[329] Francis Farquharson of Monaltrie, near Ballater on the Dee, the ‘Baron ban’ of the ’45, raised a regiment from Deeside and Braemar. He was made prisoner at Culloden, tried at London, and condemned to death, but reprieved. He was kept prisoner in England, latterly with considerable liberty at Berkhampstead, Herts. He was liberated in 1766, and returned to Monaltrie, where he devoted the rest of his life to improving the social and material condition of his country. He introduced into Aberdeenshire improved methods of farming, which he had carefully studied while in exile in England. His name is still cherished in the county as the man who did much to make Aberdeen the great farming county it became. He died in 1791.

[329] Francis Farquharson of Monaltrie, near Ballater on the Dee, the 'Baron ban' of the '45, raised a regiment from Deeside and Braemar. He was captured at Culloden, tried in London, and sentenced to death, but was given a reprieve. He was kept in a prison in England, eventually with a good deal of freedom at Berkhampstead, Herts. He was released in 1766 and returned to Monaltrie, where he dedicated the rest of his life to improving the social and economic conditions of his country. He introduced better farming methods in Aberdeenshire, which he had carefully studied while in exile in England. His name is still remembered in the county as the man who helped make Aberdeen the prominent farming region it became. He died in 1791.

[330] The Duke of Perth had twice to flee from Drummond Castle; first in March 1744, immediately after the failure of the projected French invasion. A party of 36 dragoons and 150 foot was sent from Stirling under Lieut.-Col. Whitney (afterwards killed at Falkirk) to surround the castle, but the Duke escaped (Chron. Atholl and Tullib., ii. 473). The second time was in July 1745, referred to post, p. 271, n. 2. This occasion was a treacherous attempt of his neighbour, Sir Patrick Murray of Ochtertyre, and Campbell of Inverawe, both officers of the Highland regiment (Black Watch), to capture him while dining at Drummond Castle. The story is detailed in The Lyon, i. 290.

[330] The Duke of Perth had to escape from Drummond Castle twice; first in March 1744, right after the failed French invasion. A group of 36 dragoons and 150 foot soldiers was sent from Stirling under Lieut.-Col. Whitney (who was later killed at Falkirk) to surround the castle, but the Duke managed to get away (Chron. Atholl and Tullib., ii. 473). The second time was in July 1745, mentioned post, p. 271, n. 2. This time, it was a treacherous plot by his neighbor, Sir Patrick Murray of Ochtertyre, and Campbell of Inverawe, both officers in the Highland regiment (Black Watch), to capture him while he was dining at Drummond Castle. The full story is covered in The Lyon, i. 290.

[331] Now spelt Balmoral, the King’s home on Deeside. The laird was badly wounded at Falkirk and took no further part in the campaign.

[331] Now spelled Balmoral, the King’s residence in Deeside. The landowner was seriously injured at Falkirk and didn’t participate in the campaign any further.

[332] Hamilton’s home was Sanstoun, now called Huntly Lodge, beside old Huntly Castle. He was left governor of Carlisle when the Jacobite army left it on their way south (21st Nov.), and on their return in December Hamilton was made governor of the Castle, while Towneley, an Englishman, was left governor of the town. Carlisle surrendered to Cumberland 30th December. Both Towneley and Hamilton were hanged on Kennington Common. (See also post, p. 173.)

[332] Hamilton’s home was Sanstoun, now known as Huntly Lodge, next to the old Huntly Castle. He was appointed governor of Carlisle when the Jacobite army left for their march south (November 21st), and upon their return in December, Hamilton was made governor of the Castle, while Towneley, an Englishman, was left in charge of the town. Carlisle surrendered to Cumberland on December 30th. Both Towneley and Hamilton were hanged on Kennington Common. (See also post, p. 173.)

[333] His home was Dunbennan, close to Huntly; the whole ‘toun’ was burnt down in 1746.

[333] His home was Dunbennan, near Huntly; the entire town was burned down in 1746.

[334] James Petrie, advocate in Aberdeen; joined the local bar 1743; appointed sheriff-depute 8th May 1744. The last deed ascertained to have been lodged before him is dated 23rd September 1745. Petrie went into hiding after the ’45. As he was not specially excluded from the Act of Indemnity of 1747, he was able to resume practice at the Aberdeen bar by taking the oath of allegiance, which he did in April 1748. (Littlejohn, Rec. Sheriff-Court of Aberdeen, iii. 116.)

[334] James Petrie, a lawyer in Aberdeen, joined the local bar in 1743 and was appointed sheriff-depute on May 8, 1744. The last record confirmed to have been submitted to him is dated September 23, 1745. Petrie went into hiding after the '45 rebellion. Since he wasn't specifically excluded from the Act of Indemnity of 1747, he was able to resume his practice at the Aberdeen bar by taking the oath of allegiance, which he did in April 1748. (Littlejohn, Rec. Sheriff-Court of Aberdeen, iii. 116.)

[335] Alexander, 4th Lord Forbes of Pitsligo; b. 1678; suc. 1691; attainted 1746; hid in his own country of Buchan, and was never captured; d. 1762.

[335] Alexander, 4th Lord Forbes of Pitsligo; born 1678; succeeded 1691; declared an outlaw in 1746; went into hiding in his home region of Buchan, and was never caught; died 1762.

[336] Boyne, a district in the north of Banffshire. The Enzie, north-western Banffshire, with part of Morayshire between the Spey and the Buckie Burn.

[336] Boyne, a neighborhood in northern Banffshire. The Enzie, in north-western Banffshire, with a portion of Morayshire situated between the Spey and the Buckie Burn.

[337] William Moir of Lonmay, Lady Erroll’s factor, was Stonywood’s brother. He acted as deputy-governor of Aberdeen during the Jacobite occupation.

[337] William Moir of Lonmay, Lady Erroll’s manager, was Stonywood’s brother. He served as the deputy governor of Aberdeen during the Jacobite occupation.

[338] Mary (Hay), Countess of Erroll in her own right, the last of the Hays of Erroll. She married Alexander Falconer, but left no issue. On her death in 1758, she was succeeded in the Errol title by James (Boyd), Lord Boyd (son of the Earl of Kilmarnock, executed in 1746), whose mother was the daughter and sole heiress of Lady Erroll’s sister Margaret, wife of the attainted Earl of Linlithgow and Callander. He assumed the name of Hay.

[338] Mary (Hay), Countess of Erroll in her own right, was the last of the Hays of Erroll. She married Alexander Falconer but had no children. After she passed away in 1758, James (Boyd), Lord Boyd (the son of the Earl of Kilmarnock, who was executed in 1746), succeeded her as the Earl of Erroll. His mother was the daughter and sole heiress of Lady Erroll’s sister Margaret, who was married to the disgraced Earl of Linlithgow and Callander. He took on the name Hay.

[339] George (Gordon), 3rd earl; b. 1722; suc. his father 30th March 1745; d. 1801. His mother was Lady Anna Murray (d. 1725), a sister of Lord George Murray; his stepmother, Lady Anne Gordon, sister of Lord Lewis Gordon. The Duchess of Gordon was his sister.

[339] George (Gordon), 3rd earl; born 1722; succeeded his father on March 30, 1745; died 1801. His mother was Lady Anna Murray (d. 1725), sister of Lord George Murray; his stepmother, Lady Anne Gordon, was the sister of Lord Lewis Gordon. The Duchess of Gordon was his sister.

[340] James (Ogilvy), 5th earl; b. 1689; suc. 1730; d. 1764. He had been imprisoned in 1715, on the outbreak of Mar’s rising.

[340] James (Ogilvy), 5th earl; b. 1689; suc. 1730; d. 1764. He was imprisoned in 1715 when Mar's uprising began.

[341] John (Keith), 3rd earl; b. 1699; suc. 1718; d. 1772. His wife was a d. of Erskine of Grange, Lord Mar’s brother. His father, 2nd earl, was out in ’15.

[341] John (Keith), 3rd earl; born 1699; succeeded in 1718; died 1772. His wife was a daughter of Erskine of Grange, Lord Mar’s brother. His father, the 2nd earl, was involved in the uprising of ’15.

[342] James (Forbes), 16th lord; b. 1689; suc. 1734; d. 1761. His first wife was sister of Lord Pitsligo; his second wife, a sister of Sir Wm. Gordon of Park, both ardent Jacobite leaders.

[342] James (Forbes), 16th lord; born 1689; succeeded in 1734; died 1761. His first wife was the sister of Lord Pitsligo; his second wife was the sister of Sir Wm. Gordon of Park, both passionate Jacobite leaders.

[343] Alexander (Fraser), 12th lord; b. c. 1684; suc. 1715; d. 1748. ‘He was a supporter of the Hanoverian Government, but took no active part in public affairs.’ (Scots Peerage, vii. 446.)

[343] Alexander (Fraser), 12th lord; born around 1684; succeeded in 1715; died in 1748. ‘He supported the Hanoverian Government but did not take an active role in public affairs.’ (Scots Peerage, vii. 446.)

[344] See ante, p. 113, n. 3.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See ante, p. 113, n. 3.

[345] Buchan, northern Aberdeenshire and part of eastern Banffshire; Formartine, the district south of Buchan, between the sea and the Don.

[345] Buchan, northern Aberdeenshire and part of eastern Banffshire; Formartine, the area south of Buchan, between the sea and the Don.

[346] The laird of Leys was then Sir Alexander Burnett, 4th bart.; d. 1758.

[346] The lord of Leys was then Sir Alexander Burnett, 4th baronet; died 1758.

[347] Rev. George Law, of Aberdeen; acted as chaplain to Stonywood’s regiment; made prisoner at Culloden; tried at Southwark in December, and acquitted. I am not aware of any active part taken by Seaton. It is mentioned that the French officers were made burghers of Aberdeen in December, and that Seaton received a similar honour; also that in February his lodging was ransacked and ‘some papers, mistically written for five or six years back, found.’ (Spald. Club. Misc., i. 360 and 385.)

[347] Rev. George Law from Aberdeen served as the chaplain for Stonywood’s regiment. He was captured at Culloden, tried in Southwark in December, and found not guilty. I’m not aware of any significant actions taken by Seaton. It’s noted that French officers became citizens of Aberdeen in December and that Seaton was given the same honor. Additionally, in February, his home was searched, and ‘some papers, written in code for five or six years, were discovered.’ (Spald. Club. Misc., i. 360 and 385.)

[348] Fourth son of Alexander, 2nd Duke of Gordon; b. c. 1724; lieutenant in the Navy, but joined Prince Charles at Edinburgh. Was appointed by him Lord-Lieut. of Banff and Aberdeen shires. Escaped after Culloden, and died at Montreuil, 1754.

[348] Fourth son of Alexander, 2nd Duke of Gordon; born c. 1724; served as a lieutenant in the Navy, but joined Prince Charles in Edinburgh. He was appointed by him as Lord-Lieutenant of Banff and Aberdeen shires. He escaped after the Battle of Culloden and died in Montreuil in 1754.

[349] At Fountainhall, East Lothian, twelve miles from Edinburgh. The Duchess was Henrietta Mordaunt, daughter of the celebrated Earl of Peterborough. On her husband’s death in 1728, she brought up her numerous children as Protestants, though her husband’s family was hereditarily Catholic. For this she received, in 1735, a pension of £1000 a year, which it is said she forfeited for entertaining Prince Charles to breakfast on the roadside as he passed her gates. Her son, the 3rd duke, took no active part in the ’45, but his influence was against his brother and the Jacobites. He seems to have remained in Gordon Castle down to March, but he left it on the 8th, ‘in the most secret manner he could,’ probably to avoid meeting Prince Charles, who visited the castle a few days later. The Duke then joined Cumberland in Aberdeen. (S.M., viii. 138.)

[349] At Fountainhall, East Lothian, twelve miles from Edinburgh. The Duchess was Henrietta Mordaunt, daughter of the famous Earl of Peterborough. After her husband died in 1728, she raised their many children as Protestants, despite her husband's family being traditionally Catholic. For this, she received a pension of £1000 a year in 1735, which she is said to have lost for hosting Prince Charles for breakfast by the roadside as he passed her gates. Her son, the 3rd duke, didn't take an active role in the '45, but his stance was against his brother and the Jacobites. He appears to have stayed at Gordon Castle until March but left on the 8th, "in the most secret manner he could," probably to avoid running into Prince Charles, who visited the castle a few days later. The Duke then joined Cumberland in Aberdeen. (S.M., viii. 138.)

[350] William Baird (b. 1701; d. 1777) of Auchmeddan, in the Aberdeenshire parish of Aberdour, on the borders of Banff, the last of an ancient family, of which the baroneted families of New Byth and Saughton are cadets. His wife was a sister of the 1st Earl Fife, then Lord Braco. He was author of a genealogical history of the Bairds (reprinted, London, 1870) and another of the Duffs, which was privately printed in 1869.

[350] William Baird (b. 1701; d. 1777) from Auchmeddan, in the Aberdeenshire parish of Aberdour, near the Banff border, was the last of an ancient family, which is related to the baroneted families of New Byth and Saughton. His wife was the sister of the 1st Earl Fife, who was then known as Lord Braco. He wrote a genealogical history of the Bairds (reprinted in London, 1870) and another one about the Duffs, which was privately published in 1869.

[351] Charles Gordon of Blelack, near Aboyne, Deeside.

[351] Charles Gordon of Blelack, near Aboyne, Deeside.

[352] A district of Aberdeenshire, south of Strathbogie and south-west of Formartine, comprising the valleys of the Urie and the Gadie.

[352] A district in Aberdeenshire, located south of Strathbogie and southwest of Formartine, covering the valleys of the Urie and the Gadie.

[353] Lord John Drummond landed a force of about 800 men, composed of his own French regiments of Royal Scots and a piquet of fifty men from each of the six Irish regiments in the French service. They landed on 22nd November at Montrose, Stonehaven, and Peterhead. Two of Drummond’s transports were captured by English men-of-war; among the prisoners so taken was Alexander Macdonell, ‘Young Glengarry,’ Mr. Lang’s Pickle the Spy.

[353] Lord John Drummond landed around 800 men, made up of his own French regiments of Royal Scots and a group of fifty men from each of the six Irish regiments in French service. They arrived on November 22 at Montrose, Stonehaven, and Peterhead. Two of Drummond’s transport ships were seized by English warships; among the captured prisoners was Alexander Macdonell, ‘Young Glengarry,’ Mr. Lang’s Pickle the Spy.

[354] These were Lord John Drummond, brother of the titular Duke of Perth, and Lord Lewis Drummond. The latter (1709-92), the lieut.-colonel of Lord John Drummond’s French Royal Scots, was the second son of John (Drummond), 2nd (but attainted) Earl of Melfort, whose father had been created Duke of Melfort by James VII. while in exile in 1692, and Duke of Melfort in the French peerage by Louis XIV. in 1701. Lord Lewis lost a leg at Culloden. He died in Paris, 1792.

[354] These were Lord John Drummond, brother of the Duke of Perth, and Lord Lewis Drummond. Lord Lewis (1709-92), the lieutenant colonel of Lord John Drummond’s French Royal Scots, was the second son of John Drummond, the 2nd (but disgraced) Earl of Melfort. His father had been made Duke of Melfort by James VII while in exile in 1692, and Duke of Melfort in the French peerage by Louis XIV in 1701. Lord Lewis lost a leg at Culloden. He died in Paris in 1792.

[355] These manifestoes are printed post, pp. 292, 293.

[355] These manifestoes are printed post, pp. 292, 293.

John Haliburton was an officer in the French service; he arrived at Inverness with despatches two days before the battle of Culloden. (Murray’s Mem., p. 433.) After Culloden he assisted in the distribution of the money (of which Cluny’s treasure was a part) landed by the French ships at Lochnanuagh in May 1746. (Albemarle Papers, p. 338.)

John Haliburton was an officer in the French army; he got to Inverness with important documents two days before the Battle of Culloden. (Murray’s Mem., p. 433.) After Culloden, he helped distribute the money (which included Cluny’s treasure) that was brought by French ships at Lochnanuagh in May 1746. (Albemarle Papers, p. 338.)

[356] This highland dress for lowland men is detailed by Lord Lewis Gordon to Stonywood as ‘plaid, short cloaths, hose, and shoes.’ (Spald. Club Misc., 408.)

[356] Lord Lewis Gordon describes this highland outfit for lowland men to Stonywood as ‘plaid, short clothes, socks, and shoes.’ (Spald. Club Misc., 408.)

[357] John (Campbell), 4th Earl of Loudoun; b. 1705; suc. 1731; d. 1782. Raised a regiment of Highlanders in 1745 (disbanded 1748). Adjutant-general to Sir John Cope at Prestonpans; sent to Inverness to command the troops in the North, October 1745; commander-in-chief in America 1756, but recalled the same year; general, and colonel 3rd (Scots) Guards 1770.

[357] John (Campbell), 4th Earl of Loudoun; born 1705; succeeded in 1731; died 1782. Raised a regiment of Highlanders in 1745 (disbanded 1748). Served as adjutant-general to Sir John Cope at Prestonpans; sent to Inverness to lead the troops in the North in October 1745; became commander-in-chief in America in 1756, but was recalled the same year; became a general and colonel of the 3rd (Scots) Guards in 1770.

[358]Order of the Rt. Hon. the Ld. Lewis Gordon, lord-lieutenant of the counties, and governor of the towns of Aberdeen and Bamff.—Whereas I desired and ordered J. Moir of Stonywood, to intimate to all the gentlemen and their doers, within the said counties of Aberdeen and Bamff, to send into the town of Aberdeen, a well-bodied man for each 100l. Scots, their valued rent, sufficiently cloathed, and in consequence of my order he wrote circular letters to all the heritors in the above counties, desiring them to send in a man sufficiently cloathed, &c. for each 100l. Scots of their valued rent; which desire they have not complied with: Therefore I order and command you, to take a sufficient party of my men, and go to all the lands within the above counties, and require from the heritors, factors, or tenants, as you shall think most proper, an able-bodied man for his m—— K—— J——’s service, with sufficient Highland cloaths, plaid and arms, for each 100l. of their valued rent, or the sum of 5l. sterl. money for each of the above men, to be paid to J. M. of Stonywood, or his order of Aberdeen: and in case of refusal of the men or money, you are forthwith to burn all the houses, corn and planting upon the foresaid estates; and to begin with the heritor or factor residing on the lands; and not to leave the said lands until the above execution be done, unless they produce Stonywood’s lines, shewing they have delivered him the men or the money. Given at Aberdeen this 12th day of December, 1745.

[358]Order of the Right Honorable Lord Lewis Gordon, lord-lieutenant of the counties and governor of the towns of Aberdeen and Banff.—I instructed J. Moir of Stonywood to notify all the gentlemen and their representatives in the counties of Aberdeen and Banff to send a fit man to the town of Aberdeen for every £100 Scots of their assessed rent. In response to my order, he sent circular letters to all the landowners in these counties, asking them to provide a suitably clothed man for each £100 Scots of their assessed rent, which they have not complied with. Therefore, I command you to gather a sufficient number of my men and go to all the lands in the above counties. Demand from the landowners, factors, or tenants—whichever you deem most appropriate—an able-bodied man for the service of His Majesty J—— K——, properly clothed in Highland attire, with a plaid and arms, for every £100 of their assessed rent, or the sum of £5 sterling for each of these men, to be paid to J. M. of Stonywood or his representative in Aberdeen. If they refuse to provide the men or the money, you are to immediately burn all houses, crops, and plantings on the mentioned estates, starting with the landowner or factor residing on those lands; and do not leave until this order is executed, unless they present Stonywood’s documents showing they have delivered the men or the money. Given at Aberdeen this 12th day of December, 1745.’

Subscrib’d      Lewis Gordon.’

Subscribed Lewis Gordon.

[359] See ante, p. 103.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 103.

[360] Of Monymusk, 2nd bart.; b. 1696; d. 1778; M.P. for Aberdeen.

[360] Of Monymusk, 2nd baronet; born 1696; died 1778; Member of Parliament for Aberdeen.

[361] A brother of the laird of Castlehill, Inverness, in whose house Prince Charles stayed in February 1746. He was a captain in Lord John Drummond’s French regiment of Royal Scots. After Culloden he was treated as a prisoner of war. By 1749 he had become lieut.-col. of the regiment. (L. in M., ii. 286.) The laird of Castlehill was Sheriff-depute of Inverness-shire, and was not a Jacobite.

[361] A brother of the laird of Castlehill, Inverness, where Prince Charles stayed in February 1746. He was a captain in Lord John Drummond’s French regiment of Royal Scots. After Culloden, he was treated as a prisoner of war. By 1749, he had become lieutenant colonel of the regiment. (L. in M., ii. 286.) The laird of Castlehill was the Sheriff-depute of Inverness-shire and did not support the Jacobite cause.

[362] Highland squatters. ‘Humly’ is the ordinary north-country term for hornless cattle. Robert Jamieson in a note to Letter XXII. in the 5th edition of Burt’s Letters from the North of Scotland, published in 1818, says: ‘In the days of our grandfathers the lower class of highlanders were, by their lowland neighbours (in the north-east lowlands at least), denominated humblies, from their wearing no covering on their head but their hair, which at a more early period they probably matted and felted.’

[362] Highland squatters. “Humly” is the common term in the north for cattle without horns. Robert Jamieson notes in Letter XXII. of the 5th edition of Burt’s Letters from the North of Scotland, published in 1818, that “In our grandparents' time, the lower class of highlanders were referred to as humblies by their lowland neighbors (at least in the northeast lowlands) because they didn’t wear anything on their heads except their hair, which they likely matted and felted in earlier times.”

[363] Donald Ban MacCrimmon, of the celebrated race of hereditary pipers to the chiefs of Macleod. This is the only mention I can recall of this pleasant story of his relations with his brother musicians. There is an exceedingly picturesque account (perhaps more picturesque than authentic) of MacCrimmon’s descent from a musician of Cremona, given in the Celtic Review, ii. 76, 1906. Though MacCrimmon escaped death at Inverurie, he was killed in the fiasco at Moy on 16th February. (See ante, p. 108.)

[363] Donald Ban MacCrimmon, from the famous lineage of hereditary pipers for the chiefs of Macleod. This is the only part of this enjoyable story about his connections with his fellow musicians that I can remember. There's a very colorful account (possibly more colorful than true) of MacCrimmon’s lineage tracing back to a musician from Cremona, found in the Celtic Review, ii. 76, 1906. Although MacCrimmon survived the incident at Inverurie, he was killed during the disaster at Moy on February 16th. (See ante, p. 108.)

When leaving Dunvegan for the anti-Jacobite campaign of ’45-’46, he had a presentiment that he would never return, and composed the words and music of a celebrated lament, which was translated or paraphrased by Sir Walter Scott:—

When he left Dunvegan for the anti-Jacobite campaign of ’45-’46, he had a feeling that he would never come back, and he wrote the words and music for a famous lament, which was translated or paraphrased by Sir Walter Scott:—

Farewell to each cliff on which breakers are foaming,
Farewell each dark glen in which red-deer are roaming,
Farewell, lonely Skye, to lake, mountain, and river,
Macleod may return, but MacCrimmon shall never.
The Banshee’s wild voice sings the death dirge before me,
And the pall of the dead for a mantle hangs o’er me;
But my heart shall not fly, and my nerve shall not quiver,
Though devoted I go—to return again, never!

[364] Sir Alexander Bannerman, 3rd bart., of Elsick, Kincardineshire (the Mearns). His mother was a Macdonald of Sleat. He escaped to France; died in Paris 1747.

[364] Sir Alexander Bannerman, 3rd baronet, of Elsick, Kincardineshire (the Mearns). His mother was a Macdonald of Sleat. He fled to France; died in Paris in 1747.

[365] This seems to be a mistake. Lord Ogilvie’s regiment marched to the north through Ogilvie’s country from Perth, by Cupar Angus, Cortachy, Clova, Glenmuick, Logie Colston, and Tarland, to Keith. (Spalding Club Misc., i. 332.)

[365] This appears to be an error. Lord Ogilvie’s regiment marched north through Ogilvie’s land from Perth, by Cupar Angus, Cortachy, Clova, Glenmuick, Logie Colston, and Tarland, to Keith. (Spalding Club Misc., i. 332.)

[366] ‘Kelly’s’ probably means John Roy Stewart’s regiment, which was originally intended for the Earl of Kellie.

[366] ‘Kelly’s’ probably refers to John Roy Stewart’s regiment, which was initially meant for the Earl of Kellie.

[367] Now spelt Clatt. Rev. Patrick Reid; ord. 1723; d. 1759.

[367] Now spelled Clatt. Rev. Patrick Reid; ordained 1723; died 1759.

[368] John Baggot, a Franco-Irishman, commanded the Prince’s Hussars (raised at Edinburgh), of which John Murray of Broughton was titular colonel. By the French Ambassador he is returned after Culloden as ‘blessé assez considérablement mais sans danger de la vie.’ (Cottin, Un Protégé de Bachaumont, p. 62.)

[368] John Baggot, a Franco-Irishman, led the Prince’s Hussars (formed in Edinburgh), with John Murray of Broughton as the honorary colonel. The French Ambassador reported him after Culloden as ‘injured fairly seriously but not in danger of death.’ (Cottin, Un Protégé de Bachaumont, p. 62.)

[369] Rev. William Taylor; ord. 1737; d. 1797, aged eighty-nine.

[369] Rev. William Taylor; ordained 1737; died 1797, at age eighty-nine.

[370] On 22nd Feb., three troops (about 130 men) of Fitzjames’s regiment of horse landed at Aberdeen from France but without horses. There was great difficulty in mounting the men. Kilmarnock’s horse (sometimes called Strathallan’s, or the Perthshire Squadron) were dismounted and the horses given to the French cavalry, while the men were formed into foot-guards. By this time, says Maxwell of Kirkconnell, Pitsligo’s horse was dwindled away to nothing, and many of its members had joined infantry corps. Two of Fitzjames’s transports, the Bourbon and the Charité, with 359 of all ranks, including the Comte de Fitzjames, were captured by English cruisers.

[370] On February 22, three troops (about 130 men) from Fitzjames’s cavalry arrived at Aberdeen from France, but without any horses. It was very challenging to mount the men. Kilmarnock’s horse (sometimes referred to as Strathallan’s or the Perthshire Squadron) were dismounted, and their horses were given to the French cavalry, while the men were organized into foot guards. By this time, according to Maxwell of Kirkconnell, Pitsligo’s horse had faded away to almost nothing, and many of its members had joined infantry units. Two of Fitzjames’s transports, the Bourbon and the Charité, with 359 personnel of all ranks, including the Comte de Fitzjames, were captured by English cruisers.

[371] On 21st Feb. a picquet of 42 men of Berwick’s (French) regiment landed at Peterhead.

[371] On February 21st, a group of 42 soldiers from Berwick’s (French) regiment landed at Peterhead.

[372] I can trace no record of this landing. It may refer to Berwick’s picquets (see p. 151), or it may be a mistake.

[372] I can't find any record of this landing. It could refer to Berwick's outposts (see p. 151), or it might be an error.

[373] William Henry (Ker) (1710-75), afterwards 4th Marquess of Lothian; captain 1st Guards (Grenadiers) 1741; aide-de-camp to Cumberland at Fontenoy; lieut.-colonel in Lord Mark Ker’s Dragoons (11th Hussars) 1745; commanded the cavalry of the left wing at Culloden. His brother, Lord Robert Ker, a captain in Barrel’s regiment, was killed in the battle.

[373] William Henry (Ker) (1710-75), later the 4th Marquess of Lothian; captain of the 1st Guards (Grenadiers) in 1741; aide-de-camp to Cumberland at Fontenoy; lieutenant-colonel in Lord Mark Ker’s Dragoons (11th Hussars) in 1745; commanded the cavalry on the left wing at Culloden. His brother, Lord Robert Ker, a captain in Barrel’s regiment, was killed in the battle.

[374] Humphrey Bland (1686-1763), author of A Treatise on Discipline. At this time he was a major-general and colonel of the dragoon regiment now the 3rd Hussars. He was governor of Edinburgh Castle from 1752 till his death. He became Commander-in-Chief in Scotland in 1753.

[374] Humphrey Bland (1686-1763), author of A Treatise on Discipline. At this time, he held the rank of major-general and was the colonel of the dragoon regiment, which is now known as the 3rd Hussars. He served as the governor of Edinburgh Castle from 1752 until his death. In 1753, he became the Commander-in-Chief in Scotland.

[375] Probably a mistake for lieut.-colonel (the command is too great for a subaltern’s), and evidently means Robert Rich (1714-85), son of Field-Marshal Sir Robert Rich, whom he succeeded as 5th bart. in 1768. Rich was at this time lieut.-colonel of Barrel’s regiment the 4th (now the K. O. Royal Lancaster regiment). At Culloden Rich was badly wounded and lost his hand.

[375] Probably a mistake for lieutenant colonel (the command is too significant for a junior officer), and clearly refers to Robert Rich (1714-85), the son of Field-Marshal Sir Robert Rich, whom he succeeded as 5th baronet in 1768. At this time, Rich was lieutenant colonel of Barrel’s regiment, the 4th (now the K. O. Royal Lancaster regiment). At Culloden, Rich was severely wounded and lost his hand.

[376] See post, p. 307.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 307.

[377] Probably means ‘light-footed laddies.’ Cf. Oxford Dict., s.v. ‘leger.’

[377] Probably means ‘light-footed boys.’ See Oxford Dict., s.v. ‘leger.’

[378] Robert Hunter of Burnside, Monifieth, was captain in the Prince’s Life-Guards, and was very active throughout the campaign. He escaped to Bergen in Norway after Culloden, and for a time was held prisoner there, but apparently soon released, for in October he is on French King’s pension list for 1800 livres as a ‘gentilhomme eccossois arrivé depuis peu en France.’

[378] Robert Hunter of Burnside, Monifieth, was a captain in the Prince’s Life-Guards and was very active during the campaign. He fled to Bergen in Norway after Culloden and was imprisoned there for a while, but he was apparently released soon after, because in October he is listed on the French King’s pension list for 1800 livres as a ‘gentilhomme eccossois arrivé depuis peu en France.’

[379] This took place on 17th March. The officer commanding the Jacobite party was Major Nicolas Glascoe, a lieutenant in Dillon’s Irish-French regiment. He acted as major and military instructor to the 2nd battalion of Lord Ogilvie’s regiment. He was made prisoner after Culloden, and tried at London in November, but pleading that he was born in France and held a French commission, he was released as a rebel, the irons were knocked off his legs, and he was treated as a prisoner of war.

[379] This happened on March 17th. The officer leading the Jacobite group was Major Nicolas Glascoe, a lieutenant in Dillon’s Irish-French regiment. He served as the major and military instructor for the 2nd battalion of Lord Ogilvie’s regiment. He was captured after Culloden and was tried in London in November, but by claiming he was born in France and held a French commission, he was released as a rebel, the shackles were removed from his legs, and he was treated as a prisoner of war.

[380] The husbands of these ladies were all in the Jacobite army.

[380] The husbands of these women were all in the Jacobite army.

[381] Cullen House was the home of Lord Findlater.

[381] Cullen House was the residence of Lord Findlater.

[382] William Thornton, of Thornville, near Knaresborough, raised and equipped a company, known as the ‘Yorkshire Blues,’ at his own expense in October 1745. He joined Wade’s army at Newcastle, and his company was attached to Pulteney’s regiment (13th, now Prince Albert’s Own Somersetshire Light Infantry), which was below strength. His henchman and servant was John Metcalf, better known as ‘Blind Jack of Knaresborough,’ afterwards celebrated as a civil engineer and maker of roads, but at this time a horse-coper and itinerant musician. At Falkirk the company served as escort to the artillery which covered itself with disgrace. Blind Jack fought at the battle in which his master and Lieutenant Crofts were taken prisoners. After the battle Blind Jack retreated to Edinburgh along with the remains of the company, now reduced to forty-eight from an original strength of sixty-four. In a quaint little book, The Life of John Metcalf (3rd edition, Leeds, 1802), there is a long and graphic account of how this blind man succeeded in rescuing his master. Donning a ‘plaid waist-coat,’ the Jacobite uniform, he made his way from Edinburgh to the battle field, where among the marauders hunting for plunder he found the wife of Lord George Murray’s cook, who gave him ‘a token’ for her husband. Giving out that he wished to be employed as a musician to Prince Charles, he made his way to Lord George Murray’s quarters at Falkirk, where that General gave him a glass of wine, and he had a conversation with several of the Jacobite leaders. Confined on suspicion for some days, he was acquitted by a court-martial. Finding his captain, he had him disguised as a Highlander and managed to escape with him. How Crofts and Simson escaped I do not know. The rev. ensign was Patrick Simson, minister of Fala, near Dalkeith (b. 1713; ord. 1743; transferred to Clunie, Dunkeld, 1759; d. 1771). How he joined Thornton’s ‘Blues’ I do not know; one would rather have expected to find him in the Glasgow regiment (see post, p. 198). The original ensign of the company had died at Newcastle, and Thornton may have appointed Simson when in Edinburgh. Simson had the reputation of being a sportsman, particularly an angler. (Scott, Fasti.) The Dict. of Nat. Biog. says that Blind Jack fought at Culloden, but it is not so stated in the life quoted above, and if this passage is correct it precludes the possibility. There is no mention in the Life of this incident at Ellon, nor any account of the company leaving the army.

[382] William Thornton, from Thornville near Knaresborough, raised and equipped a company called the ‘Yorkshire Blues’ at his own expense in October 1745. He joined Wade’s army in Newcastle, and his company was assigned to Pulteney’s regiment (13th, now known as Prince Albert’s Own Somersetshire Light Infantry), which was under strength. His right-hand man and servant was John Metcalf, better known as ‘Blind Jack of Knaresborough,’ who later became famous as a civil engineer and road maker, but at this time he was a horse trader and traveling musician. At Falkirk, the company served as an escort to the artillery, which ended up dishonoring itself. Blind Jack fought in the battle where his master and Lieutenant Crofts were captured. After the battle, Blind Jack retreated to Edinburgh with what was left of the company, now down to forty-eight from the original sixty-four. In a quaint little book, The Life of John Metcalf (3rd edition, Leeds, 1802), there is a detailed account of how this blind man managed to rescue his master. Wearing a ‘plaid waistcoat,’ the Jacobite uniform, he made his way from Edinburgh to the battlefield, where he encountered the wife of Lord George Murray’s cook, who gave him ‘a token’ for her husband. Claiming he wanted to be employed as a musician for Prince Charles, he made his way to Lord George Murray’s quarters at Falkirk, where the General offered him a glass of wine, and he spoke with several Jacobite leaders. After being detained on suspicion for a few days, he was cleared by a court-martial. He found his captain, disguised him as a Highlander, and managed to escape with him. I don’t know how Crofts and Simson escaped. The reverend ensign was Patrick Simson, minister of Fala, near Dalkeith (b. 1713; ord. 1743; transferred to Clunie, Dunkeld, 1759; d. 1771). I don’t know how he joined Thornton’s ‘Blues’; one would expect him to be in the Glasgow regiment (see post, p. 198). The original ensign of the company had died in Newcastle, and Thornton may have appointed Simson while in Edinburgh. Simson was known as a sportsman, especially an angler. (Scott, Fasti.) The Dict. of Nat. Biog. mentions that Blind Jack fought at Culloden, but it’s not stated in the life mentioned above, and if this passage is accurate, it rules out that possibility. There is no mention in the Life of this incident at Ellon, nor any details about the company leaving the army.

[383] Cumberland left Aberdeen on April 8th.

[383] Cumberland left Aberdeen on April 8th.

[384] Meaning ‘a verminous swarm of red-coats.’

[384] Meaning ‘a bothersome crowd of soldiers in red coats.’

[385] A very considerable list of houses burnt in Aberdeen and Banff shires is given in the Lyon in Mourning, ii. 334, 335.

[385] A significant list of houses burned in Aberdeen and Banff shires is provided in the Lyon in Mourning, ii. 334, 335.

[386]By the Earl of Ancrum, Aid de Camp to His Majesty, and commanding the forces on the Eastern coast of North-Britain. Whereas arms have been found in several houses, contrary to his Royal Highness the Duke’s proclamation, this is therefore to give notice, That where-ever arms of any kind are found, that the house, and all houses belonging to the proprietor or his tenants, shall be immediately burnt to ashes; and that as some arms have been found under ground, that if any shall be discovered for the future, the adjacent houses and fields shall be immediately laid waste and destroyed.’

[386]By the Earl of Ancrum, Aide-de-Camp to His Majesty, and in command of the forces on the eastern coast of North Britain. Due to the discovery of weapons in several homes, in violation of His Royal Highness the Duke’s proclamation, this is to announce that whenever any kind of weapons is found, the house and all properties owned by the owner or their tenants will be immediately burned to the ground; and since some weapons have been found underground, if any are discovered in the future, the nearby houses and fields will be immediately destroyed.’

[Lord Loudoun’s orders]:—‘Whereas great part of the King’s arms belonging to the regiment commanded by the Rt. Hon. the Earl of Loudon, were taken away by the rebels in Sutherland, and by them distributed to people of different parts of the country; who, notwithstanding the many orders published by his Royal Highness the Duke, still detain them in their possession: These are to advertise such as do not deliver them in to the storehouse at Inverness, or to the commanding officer of any part of his Majesty’s forces who happens to be in their neighbourhood, by the first day of August, that the possessors where-ever they are found, whether civil or military, and of what rank soever, shall be prosecuted with the utmost rigour, as the law in that case directs.’

[Lord Loudoun’s orders]:—‘Since a significant portion of the King’s weapons belonging to the regiment led by the Rt. Hon. the Earl of Loudoun has been taken by the rebels in Sutherland and distributed among various individuals across the country; who, despite numerous orders issued by His Royal Highness the Duke, still hold onto them: This is to inform anyone who does not return them to the storehouse in Inverness, or to the commanding officer of any part of His Majesty’s forces nearby, by the first day of August, that those in possession, regardless of where they are found, whether civilian or military, and of any rank, will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law as it applies in such cases.’

[387] This was an incident that occasioned fierce indignation in Aberdeen. August 1st was the date of the accession of the Hanoverian dynasty. Lord Ancram ordered the bells to be rung and the houses to be illuminated. It had not been the custom to illuminate, and the magistrates only ordered the bells to be rung. The soldiers of Fleming’s regiment (36th, now the Worcestershire), egged on by their officers, broke the windows, stoned the inhabitants, and did damage to the extent of £130, a large sum in those days to a town of the size of Aberdeen. In spite of the pretensions of the military authorities, who maintained that they were not liable to the civil government, the magistrates arrested a Captain Morgan and other officers, who were ringleaders in the riot. Morgan had been very active in hunting fugitive Jacobites, and his commanding officer, who calls Aberdeen ‘this infamous town,’ attributes his arrest to this cause. Representations were made to the Lord Justice-Clerk and to Lord Albemarle, the Commander-in-chief in Scotland, who both took a serious view of the case, the former writing to the latter that ‘the officers in the army were trampling on those very laws that they so lately defended at the expence of their blood.’ Ancram was rebuked by Albemarle, and removed from Aberdeen; though the trouble still smouldered it was temporarily patched up. (Alb. Pap., p. 27 seq.; Scots Mag., viii. 393.) Six months later the regiment left Aberdeen, marching out (it is said) to the tune ‘We’ll gang nae mair to yon toun.’ Cf. post, p. 189.

[387] This incident caused a lot of anger in Aberdeen. August 1st marked the beginning of the Hanoverian dynasty. Lord Ancram ordered the bells to be rung and the houses to be lit up. It hadn't been the usual practice to light up, and the local authorities only had the bells rung. The soldiers of Fleming’s regiment (36th, now the Worcestershire), encouraged by their officers, broke windows, hurled stones at residents, and caused damage worth £130, which was a significant amount for a town like Aberdeen at that time. Despite the military leaders insisting they weren’t accountable to the local government, the magistrates arrested Captain Morgan and other officers who were leading the riot. Morgan had been actively pursuing fugitive Jacobites, and his commanding officer, who referred to Aberdeen as ‘this infamous town,’ blamed his arrest on this. Complaints were made to the Lord Justice-Clerk and to Lord Albemarle, the Commander-in-chief in Scotland, both of whom took the matter seriously, with the former writing to the latter that ‘the officers in the army were trampling on those very laws that they so lately defended at the expense of their blood.’ Ancram was criticized by Albemarle and removed from Aberdeen; although the situation still simmered, it was temporarily resolved. (Alb. Pap., p. 27 seq.; Scots Mag., viii. 393.) Six months later, the regiment left Aberdeen, marching out (it’s said) to the tune ‘We’ll gang nae mair to yon toun.’ Cf. post, p. 189.

[388] Hugh (Abercromby-Sempill), fifth son of Anne, Baroness Sempill, and Francis Abercromby of Fetterneir. Succeeded his brother as 11th Lord Sempill 1727; served at Malplaquet, 1709, as an ensign; succeeded Lord Crawford as colonel of the Highland Regiment (Black Watch), 1741; colonel of the 25th (K. O. Scottish Borderers) 1745; brigadier-general 1745; commanded the left wing at Culloden; superseded Lord Ancram at Aberdeen 12th August, 1746; and died there 25th November following.

[388] Hugh (Abercromby-Sempill), the fifth son of Anne, Baroness Sempill, and Francis Abercromby of Fetterneir. He took over from his brother as the 11th Lord Sempill in 1727; fought at Malplaquet in 1709 as an ensign; replaced Lord Crawford as colonel of the Highland Regiment (Black Watch) in 1741; became colonel of the 25th (K. O. Scottish Borderers) in 1745; was promoted to brigadier-general in 1745; led the left wing at Culloden; took over from Lord Ancram at Aberdeen on August 12, 1746; and passed away there on November 25 of the same year.

[389] Should be 25th; Sunday 24th was spent at Kendal, and Lancaster was reached the following day. (L. in M., ii. 120, 193.)

[389] Should be 25th; Sunday 24th was spent in Kendal, and Lancaster was reached the next day. (L. in M., ii. 120, 193.)

[390] I have little doubt that this name is a mistake for Geohagan, an Irishman, captain in Lally’s regiment, to whom, Lord Elcho states, the Prince gave a commission to raise an English regiment. The officers of the army remonstrated, and the commission was withdrawn. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 327.) Geohagan was one of the French officers taken prisoner at Carlisle.

[390] I have no doubt that this name is a mistake for Geohagan, an Irishman and captain in Lally’s regiment, to whom Lord Elcho states the Prince gave a commission to form an English regiment. The army officers objected, and the commission was revoked. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 327.) Geohagan was one of the French officers captured at Carlisle.

[391] Not identified.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Not identified.

[392] David Morgan was a Welshman from Monmouthshire, a barrister-at-law. He joined the Prince at Preston on 27th November, along with William Vaughan and Francis Towneley, all being from Wales. When at Derby it was determined to return to Scotland Morgan refused to go, saying, ‘it were better to be hanged in England than starved in Scotland’ (Tales of a Grandfather). He left the army at Ashbourne, on 6th December, to go to London to procure intelligence, with the knowledge and consent of the Prince and of Sheridan (Murray’s Memorials, 434). At his trial he pled that he had escaped as soon as it was in his power, but this plea was repelled. He was executed at Kennington Common on 30th July, along with Towneley, and seven other English officers. Morgan is thus described in the Compleat History of the Trials of the Rebels (p. 170): ‘David Morgan was about 51 Years of Age, born in Wales, and bred to the Law, and had frequently (as a Barrister) attended the Courts at Westminster-Hall, and elsewhere. He was a Person of a very mean Look, and seldom kept Company with any Gentlemen of his Neighbourhood; and if it had not been for his Estate, he might have starv’d, for he was so very lofty, and of so bad a Temper, that no body but such as were beholden to him cared to employ him. This Morgan was possessed of a very good Estate in St. Leonard’s, Shoreditch, but he let it all run to Ruin, because he would not pay the Ground-Rent. The Rebels call’d Morgan the Pretender’s Counsellor, and his Advice was consulted on every Occasion. Even after he was condemn’d, he was haughty and insolent beyond expression; and the very Afternoon before his Execution, he grumbled to pay the Cook who dress’d his Dinner, and said she was very extravagant in her Demands. The Morning (about Six o’Clock) before he went to Execution, he order’d Coffee to be made, and bid them take Care to make it very good and strong, for he had never drank any since he had been in that Prison fit to come near a Gentleman; and because it was ready before he was unlock’d, he seem’d angry, and in a great Passion.’

[392] David Morgan was a Welshman from Monmouthshire and a barrister. He joined the Prince in Preston on November 27th, along with William Vaughan and Francis Towneley, all of whom were from Wales. When it was decided to return to Scotland in Derby, Morgan refused to go, saying, "It’s better to be hanged in England than starved in Scotland" (Tales of a Grandfather). He left the army in Ashbourne on December 6th to go to London to gather information, with the knowledge and consent of the Prince and Sheridan (Murray’s Memorials, 434). At his trial, he claimed he had escaped as soon as he could, but this argument was dismissed. He was executed at Kennington Common on July 30th, along with Towneley and seven other English officers. Morgan is described in the Compleat History of the Trials of the Rebels (p. 170): "David Morgan was about 51 years old, born in Wales and trained in law, frequently attending the courts at Westminster Hall and elsewhere as a barrister. He had a rather unimpressive appearance and rarely associated with the gentlemen in his area; without his estate, he might have starved, as he was so proud and difficult that few wanted to hire him. Morgan owned a good estate in St. Leonard’s, Shoreditch, but let it fall into disrepair because he refused to pay the ground rent. The Rebels called him the Pretender’s Counselor, and his advice was sought on every occasion. Even after being condemned, he was extremely arrogant and insolent; the very afternoon before his execution, he complained about having to pay the cook who prepared his dinner, claiming she was asking for too much. On the morning (around six o'clock) before his execution, he ordered coffee and insisted they make it very good and strong, saying he hadn’t had any decent coffee since he’d been in that prison. When it was ready before he was let out of his cell, he seemed angry and was in a great rage."

Morgan was the author of a rather dull satirical political poem of 630 verses, entitled The Country Bard or the Modern Courtiers, inscribed to H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, a quarto originally printed in 1741, and republished in 1746 after his execution. It is prefaced by a dedicatory letter to Sir Watkin Williams Wynn, the Welsh Jacobite baronet. In his dying declaration, handed to the sheriff on the scaffold, Morgan writes that he is a member of the Church of England, and that he has fully set forth his faith in a poem of two books entitled The Christian Test or the Coalition of Faith and Reason, the first of which he had already published, and the latter he bequeathed to his daughter to be published by her. Morgan seems to have had a certain notoriety as member of a Jacobite club at Westminster, judging by a very coarse jeu d’esprit bearing the title A Faithful Narrative of the wonderful and surprising Appearance of Counsellor Morgan’s ghost at the meeting ... giving a full and true Account of the Behaviour of the Club on that occasion.... This folio, for it has that dignity, is followed by another entitled An Appeal from the late David Morgan, Esq., Barrister-at-Law ... against a late Scurrilous Paper.... My copy of the second pamphlet bears the note in contemporary handwriting ‘By one Fielding a concealer of the Law,’ and it is possible it may be by Henry Fielding, who at this time gave himself to ironical writing of this kind in the True Patriot and the Jacobite’s Journal. Both pamphlets are full of topical allusions and scarcely concealed names. Morgan was also the subject of a brutally coarse print entitled ‘An Exact Description of the Solemn Procession of Councellor Morgan’s ghost to the Rump of the Westminster Independents.’

Morgan was the author of a pretty dull satirical political poem of 630 verses, titled The Country Bard or the Modern Courtiers, inscribed to H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, a quarto first printed in 1741 and reissued in 1746 after his execution. It starts with a dedicatory letter to Sir Watkin Williams Wynn, the Welsh Jacobite baronet. In his dying statement, given to the sheriff on the scaffold, Morgan declares that he is a member of the Church of England and that he’s expressed his beliefs in a poem of two books titled The Christian Test or the Coalition of Faith and Reason, the first of which he had already published, while he left the second for his daughter to publish. Morgan seems to have gained some notoriety as a member of a Jacobite club in Westminster, based on a very crude jeu d’esprit called A Faithful Narrative of the wonderful and surprising Appearance of Counsellor Morgan’s ghost at the meeting ... giving a full and true Account of the Behaviour of the Club on that occasion.... This folio, as it indeed is, is followed by another one titled An Appeal from the late David Morgan, Esq., Barrister-at-Law ... against a late Scurrilous Paper.... My copy of the second pamphlet has a note in contemporary handwriting that reads ‘By one Fielding a concealer of the Law,’ and it’s possible it was written by Henry Fielding, who at that time was known for his ironic writing in the True Patriot and the Jacobite’s Journal. Both pamphlets are packed with topical references and barely disguised names. Morgan was also the subject of a rough print called ‘An Exact Description of the Solemn Procession of Councellor Morgan’s ghost to the Rump of the Westminster Independents.’

[393] The only elucidation of this I can suggest is from a passage in the Appeal above mentioned in which Morgan’s ghost is made to visit his friends, but ‘with neither a greyhound upon his breast nor a writ in his hand,’ perhaps suggesting that in life he was in the habit of carrying writs and being accompanied by a greyhound.

[393] The only explanation I can offer is from a section in the Appeal mentioned above, where Morgan’s ghost visits his friends, but ‘with neither a greyhound on his chest nor a legal document in his hand,’ maybe implying that in life he often carried legal documents and had a greyhound with him.

[394] The colonel appointed was Francis Towneley, an English Roman Catholic; b. 1709; fifth son of Charles Towneley of Towneley Hall, Lancashire; went to France 1728, and entered the French army; served at the siege of Philipsbourg under the Duke of Berwick, but after the peace following the War of the Polish Succession, returned to England, and lived privately in Wales until 1745. The French king sent him a colonel’s commission about the time of the intended invasion of 1744. (See Towneley MSS., privately printed.) He was given command of the Manchester regiment, as told here; was left governor of the town of Carlisle when the army retreated to Scotland in December; entirely opposed to surrendering to Cumberland, flying into a passion with Hamilton, the governor of the castle (see pp. 118, 193), and declaring ‘that it was better to die by the sword than to fall into the hands of those damned Hanovarians.’ (Evidence at Trial.) At Hamilton’s trial evidence was given that he too desired to hold out to the last, but was overruled by his officers. Towneley was tried at Southwark in July 1746; pled that his French commission entitled him to be treated as a prisoner of war, not a rebel; but this was repelled as, being an Englishman born, it was illegal to serve a sovereign at war with the British king; executed on Kennington Common, July 30th, and Hamilton on Nov. 15th.

[394] The appointed colonel was Francis Towneley, an English Roman Catholic; born in 1709; the fifth son of Charles Towneley of Towneley Hall, Lancashire; he moved to France in 1728 and joined the French army; he fought at the siege of Philipsburg under the Duke of Berwick, but after the peace that followed the War of the Polish Succession, he returned to England and lived privately in Wales until 1745. The French king gave him a colonel’s commission around the time of the planned invasion of 1744. (See Towneley MSS., privately printed.) He was appointed to lead the Manchester regiment, as described here; he was left in charge of the town of Carlisle when the army retreated to Scotland in December; strongly opposed to surrendering to Cumberland, he got into an argument with Hamilton, the governor of the castle (see pp. 118, 193), declaring ‘that it was better to die by the sword than to fall into the hands of those damned Hanovarians.’ (Evidence at Trial.) During Hamilton’s trial, evidence was presented that he also wanted to hold out until the end, but was overruled by his officers. Towneley was tried in Southwark in July 1746; he argued that his French commission entitled him to be treated as a prisoner of war, not a rebel; however, this was rejected because, being a British-born individual, it was illegal for him to serve a sovereign at war with the British king; he was executed on Kennington Common on July 30th, and Hamilton on November 15th.

[395] The Prince’s Life Guards: there were two troops, one commanded by Lord Elcho, the other by Colonel Elphinstone, afterwards Lord Balmerino.

[395] The Prince’s Life Guards: there were two troops, one led by Lord Elcho, the other by Colonel Elphinstone, who later became Lord Balmerino.

[396] The army left Manchester on 1st December. The quarrel which caused Lord George Murray’s resignation of his commission as lieut.-gen. took place at Carlisle on 15th November, when the command was given to the Duke of Perth. Daniel cannot be correct in stating that Lord George was not reinstated until the army was at Manchester; the quarrel was made up before leaving Carlisle on November 20th, when Lord George led the van. Daniel, who did not join the army until the 24th or 25th, is probably writing from hazy recollection of what he had been told.

[396] The army left Manchester on December 1st. The argument that led to Lord George Murray resigning his commission as lieutenant general happened in Carlisle on November 15th, when command was given to the Duke of Perth. Daniel is mistaken in saying that Lord George wasn’t reinstated until the army arrived in Manchester; the conflict was resolved before leaving Carlisle on November 20th, when Lord George led the advance. Daniel, who didn’t join the army until the 24th or 25th, is likely recalling vague memories of what he was told.

[397] Weir or Vere was the principal witness at the trials of the officers taken prisoner at Carlisle.

[397] Weir or Vere was the main witness during the trials of the officers captured at Carlisle.

[398] Jean Louis Ligonnier, generally termed Sir John Ligonier, K.B., a naturalised French Protestant; b. at Castres, France, 1680; emigrated to Dublin; fought under Marlborough through most of his campaigns; major-general 1739; lieut.-general 1743; commanded the infantry at Fontenoy; commanded the army sent to Staffordshire to oppose the Jacobites, until relieved by the Duke of Cumberland, 27th November; commander-in-chief 1757; created Viscount Ligonier 1757; Earl Ligonier 1766; field-marshal 1760; d. 1770. He had a brother Francis, who succeeded Colonel Gardiner in command of the Dragoon regiment, now 13th Hussars. Francis Ligonier, though suffering from pleurisy, fought at Falkirk, caught more cold, and died a few days later.

[398] Jean Louis Ligonnier, commonly known as Sir John Ligonier, K.B., a naturalized French Protestant; born in Castres, France, in 1680; moved to Dublin; fought alongside Marlborough in most of his campaigns; became major-general in 1739; lieutenant-general in 1743; led the infantry at Fontenoy; commanded the army sent to Staffordshire to fight against the Jacobites until replaced by the Duke of Cumberland on November 27; served as commander-in-chief in 1757; made Viscount Ligonier in 1757; became Earl Ligonier in 1766; promoted to field-marshal in 1760; died in 1770. He had a brother named Francis, who took over from Colonel Gardiner in leading the Dragoon regiment, now the 13th Hussars. Francis Ligonier, despite suffering from pleurisy, fought at Falkirk, caught a cold, and passed away a few days later.

[399] 6th December 1745 (Black Friday).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ December 6, 1745 (Black Friday).

[400] The journals of the day and most authorities estimate the number at about 800. They consisted of Lord John Drummond’s own French regiment, ‘the Royal Scots,’ and the Irish picquets, or 50 men picked from each of the six Irish regiments in the French service. Two of the transports were taken on the voyage and 260 of all ranks made prisoner. On the eve of Culloden, the French envoy reported to his government that the numbers of French troops then were: Irish Picquets reduced to a half but recruited by 148 prisoners and deserters up to 260 men; Royal Scots about 350; detachment of Berwick’s regiment (p. 151) 42; Fitzjames’s horse 131; making a total of about 780. (Cottin, op. cit. p. 36.)

[400] The newspapers of the time and most experts estimate the number at around 800. This included Lord John Drummond’s own French regiment, 'the Royal Scots,' and the Irish picquets, or 50 men chosen from each of the six Irish regiments in the French service. Two of the transport ships were captured during the journey, and 260 personnel of all ranks were taken prisoner. On the eve of Culloden, the French envoy reported to his government that the current numbers of French troops were: Irish Picquets decreased to half but bolstered by 148 prisoners and deserters, totaling 260 men; Royal Scots approximately 350; a detachment of Berwick’s regiment (p. 151) 42; Fitzjames’s horse 131; making a total of about 780. (Cottin, op. cit. p. 36.)

[401] See ante, p. 143.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 143.

[402] ‘Tuesday, 10th December.—They have ordered a contribution of £5000 for the insolence of the mob, but with much ado they have got it to one-half, to raise it by one o’clock.’ (Journal of Elizabeth Byrom, Manchester, in 1745.)

[402] ‘Tuesday, December 10th.—They demanded a contribution of £5000 for the audacity of the crowd, but after much fuss, they managed to settle on half that amount, to be raised by one o’clock.’ (Journal of Elizabeth Byrom, Manchester, in 1745.)

[403] Hon. Arthur Elphinstone; b. 1688; held captain’s commission in Shannon’s foot (25th, now King’s Own Scottish Borderers), which he resigned in 1716 to join Mar’s Jacobite army; served in the French army; on a pardon being offered to him he declined to accept it until he had received the Chevalier’s consent, which was given; joined Prince Charles at Edinburgh; received the command of the second troop of Life Guards; on the death of his brother, 5th January 1746, he succeeded as 6th Lord Balmerino and 5th Lord Coupar; the army was then at Stirling. The day after Culloden he surrendered to the Grants. Tried by the House of Lords and condemned to death; beheaded, 18th August 1746.

[403] Hon. Arthur Elphinstone; born 1688; he held a captain’s commission in Shannon’s foot (25th, now King’s Own Scottish Borderers), which he gave up in 1716 to join Mar’s Jacobite army; served in the French army; when a pardon was offered to him, he chose not to accept it until he received consent from the Chevalier, which was granted; joined Prince Charles in Edinburgh; took command of the second troop of Life Guards; after his brother died on January 5, 1746, he became the 6th Lord Balmerino and 5th Lord Coupar; the army was then in Stirling. The day after Culloden, he surrendered to the Grants. He was tried by the House of Lords and sentenced to death; beheaded on August 18, 1746.

[404] Col. James Alex. Grant or Grante, a member of the staff of the French Royal Observatory. He landed at Montrose in October along with the French envoy. He served as master of ordnance to Prince Charles. He planned the siege of Carlisle, which succeeded. He communicated a plan for the siege of Stirling Castle, which was abandoned, as it exposed the town to destruction, and the charge was given to another French engineer, Mirabel de Gordon, who utterly failed. Grant planned the siege of Fort Augustus, which succeeded. He then planned the siege of Fort William, but was disabled at the outset by a contusion from a spent cannon ball: Mirabel was given charge of the siege, and again signally failed. Grant prepared an elaborate map of the expedition, published in French, English, and Italian editions, which are all described in the Itinerary, pp. 104-107.

[404] Col. James Alex. Grant or Grante, a member of the staff of the French Royal Observatory. He arrived at Montrose in October with the French envoy. He served as the master of ordnance for Prince Charles. He planned the successful siege of Carlisle. He proposed a plan for the siege of Stirling Castle, which was abandoned because it would expose the town to destruction, and the task was assigned to another French engineer, Mirabel de Gordon, who completely failed. Grant also planned the successful siege of Fort Augustus. He then planned the siege of Fort William but was injured early on by a blow from a spent cannonball: Mirabel was given charge of the siege again and failed once more. Grant created a detailed map of the expedition, published in French, English, and Italian editions, all of which are described in the Itinerary, pp. 104-107.

[405] The Yorkshire Hunters, a corps of volunteer cavalry, which did not distinguish itself greatly. Its war-song, set to music, will be found in the Gentleman’s Magazine, December 1745.

[405] The Yorkshire Hunters, a group of volunteer cavalry, didn’t really stand out much. Their war song, set to music, can be found in the Gentleman’s Magazine, December 1745.

[406] Daniel probably means the Dutch troops, some of which landed at Berwick and the Tyne in Sept. ’45. The Hessians did not come over until Feb. ’46.

[406] Daniel is likely referring to the Dutch troops, some of whom arrived at Berwick and the Tyne in September '45. The Hessians didn't arrive until February '46.

[407] See ante, p. 150.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 150.

[408] Should be Cluny Macpherson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ should be Cluny Macpherson.

[409] This is the celebrated ‘Skirmish of Clifton,’ fought 18th December; described by Sir Walter Scott in Waverley, chap. lix. and note. Both sides claimed the victory. The late Chancellor Ferguson wrote an exhaustive monograph on the subject (Kendal, 1889) showing that both were technically right. The Jacobite rear-guard fought to protect the army’s retreat to Carlisle, and entirely succeeded in their object; Cumberland’s troops retained possession of the field, but were too crippled to pursue. Daniel, I think, shows a certain animus in entirely ignoring Lord George Murray, who directed this action and fought it with great bravery and skill.

[409] This is the famous 'Skirmish of Clifton,' fought on December 18th; described by Sir Walter Scott in Waverley, chap. lix. and note. Both sides claimed victory. The late Chancellor Ferguson wrote a detailed study on the subject (Kendal, 1889) showing that both were technically correct. The Jacobite rear-guard fought to protect the army's retreat to Carlisle and completely succeeded in their goal; Cumberland's troops held the field but were too weakened to pursue. Daniel, I believe, demonstrates a certain bias by completely ignoring Lord George Murray, who led this action and fought it with great bravery and skill.

[410] At the surrender of Carlisle to Cumberland on 30th December the following officers were captured:—

[410] At the surrender of Carlisle to Cumberland on December 30th, the following officers were captured:—

English, 20 officers and 1 chaplain—of these 9 officers and the chaplain were executed;

English, 20 officers and 1 chaplain—among them, 9 officers and the chaplain were executed;

Scots, 17 officers and 1 surgeon—of these 5 officers were executed;

Scots, 17 officers and 1 surgeon—out of these, 5 officers were executed;

French, 3 officers, who were treated as prisoners of war.

French, 3 officers who were considered prisoners of war.

In addition 93 English, 256 Scots, 5 French non-commissioned officers and men were taken prisoner.

In addition, 93 English and 256 Scots, along with 5 French non-commissioned officers and soldiers, were captured.

[411] This date is wrong; it should be 20th December, the Prince’s birthday and the day he left Carlisle. The date is often given as 31st December, which is the New Style equivalent. Old Style was used in Great Britain until 1752.

[411] This date is incorrect; it should be December 20th, the Prince's birthday and the day he left Carlisle. The date is often listed as December 31st, which is the New Style equivalent. Old Style was used in Great Britain until 1752.

[412] The Rev. John Bisset, one of the ministers of St. Nicholas Church, Aberdeen, from 1728 to 1756. He was a man of strong personality who spoke his mind, and was not very popular with his brethren. Bisset kept a Diary during the Rising of ’45, most of which is printed in the Spalding Club Misc., vol. i. In that volume there is no reference to this sermon, nor do I know when it was preached. It is referred to in general terms by the late Mr. Watt in his County History of Aberdeen and Banff, p. 303. The sermon was probably printed or Daniel could not have quoted it, but Mr. P. J. Anderson, who has kindly searched the Aberdeen University Library, cannot find a copy. Bisset, though uncompromisingly inimical to the Jacobites, declined an official meeting with the Duke of Cumberland as a member of the Aberdeen Synod, but he obtained a private interview as ‘he had reasons for being alone.’ Bisset so deeply offended the duke that he refused ever after to enter a Presbyterian church. (Henderson, Hist. of the Rebellion, 5th ed., p. 307.)

[412] The Rev. John Bisset was one of the ministers at St. Nicholas Church in Aberdeen from 1728 to 1756. He had a strong personality and was outspoken, which didn’t make him very popular among his colleagues. Bisset kept a Diary during the Rising of ’45, most of which is published in the Spalding Club Misc., vol. i. That volume doesn't mention this sermon, and I don't know when it was delivered. The late Mr. Watt discusses it in general terms in his County History of Aberdeen and Banff, p. 303. The sermon was probably printed, or else Daniel wouldn't have quoted it, but Mr. P. J. Anderson, who kindly looked in the Aberdeen University Library, couldn't find a copy. Although Bisset was staunchly opposed to the Jacobites, he turned down an official meeting with the Duke of Cumberland as a member of the Aberdeen Synod, but he did manage to secure a private meeting because ‘he had reasons for being alone.’ Bisset offended the duke so much that he refused to set foot in a Presbyterian church again. (Henderson, Hist. of the Rebellion, 5th ed., p. 307.)

[413] This refers to the Prince’s army. The Prince himself was never in Aberdeen.

[413] This refers to the Prince’s army. The Prince himself was never in Aberdeen.

[414] A party of Dumfries townsfolk had cut off a detachment of the Jacobite army’s baggage during the advance to England in November. As a reprisal Prince Charles fined the town £2000. Only £1100 could be raised in the time given, so he carried off the provost and another citizen as security till the balance was paid. (Scots Mag., vii. 533, 581.)

[414] A group of townspeople from Dumfries intercepted a supply convoy from the Jacobite army while they were moving towards England in November. In response, Prince Charles imposed a fine of £2000 on the town. They could only gather £1100 in the time allowed, so he took the provost and another resident as collateral until the remaining amount was paid. (Scots Mag., vii. 533, 581.)

[415] The army began to arrive on Christmas Day. Charles himself entered on foot at the head of the clans on 26th December. He remained in Glasgow until 3rd January.

[415] The army started arriving on Christmas Day. Charles himself entered on foot leading the clans on December 26th. He stayed in Glasgow until January 3rd.

[416] A very different story is told by Provost Cochrane of Glasgow, who wrote: ‘Our very ladys had not the curiosity to go near him, and declined going to a ball held by his chiefs. Very few were at the windows when he made his appearance, and such as were declared him not handsome. This no doubt fretted.’ (Cochrane Correspondence, Maitland Club, p. 63.) Probably both versions have a certain amount of truth, and the situation must have been similar to that of an earlier royalist leader when riding through Edinburgh:—

[416] Provost Cochrane of Glasgow tells a very different story. He wrote: "Our ladies weren’t curious enough to go near him and refused to attend a ball thrown by his supporters. Very few were at the windows when he showed up, and those who were claimed he wasn't attractive. This, without a doubt, bothered him." (Cochrane Correspondence, Maitland Club, p. 63.) It's likely that both versions hold some truth, and the situation must have been similar to that of an earlier royalist leader riding through Edinburgh:—

‘As he rode down the sanctified bends of the Bow,
Ilk carline was flyting and shaking her pow;
But the young plants of grace they looked couthie and slee,
Thinking, luck to thy bonnet, thou Bonny Dundee!’

[417] The Prince’s Master of the Household says: ‘The Prince dressed more elegantly when in Glasgow than he did in any other place whatsomever.’ Lord Elcho says he was ‘dress’d in the French dress.’

[417] The Prince’s Master of the Household says: ‘The Prince dressed more elegantly in Glasgow than anywhere else.’ Lord Elcho says he was ‘dressed in French style.’

[418] Mirabel de Gordon, a French engineer, who completely failed at the siege of Stirling, as he afterwards did at the siege of Fort William. Lord George Murray says of him that he understood his business, but was so volatile he could not be depended upon: Lord Macleod states that he was always drunk.

[418] Mirabel de Gordon, a French engineer, completely failed at the siege of Stirling, just as he later did at the siege of Fort William. Lord George Murray mentions that he knew his stuff, but he was so unpredictable that he couldn't be relied on. Lord Macleod states that he was always drunk.

[419] Brown was a French-Irishman, a captain in Lally’s regiment, who came over with the French envoy in October. He was left in Carlisle, but escaped at the surrender. After Falkirk he was sent to France to carry the news of the victory to Louis XV., who made him a colonel in the French army. He returned to Scotland in March in the Hazard sloop, which was driven ashore by four men-of-war at Tongue in Sutherland, when the passengers and crew were captured by Lord Reay and his militia.

[419] Brown was a French-Irishman, a captain in Lally’s regiment, who arrived with the French envoy in October. He stayed in Carlisle but managed to escape during the surrender. After Falkirk, he was sent to France to inform Louis XV. about the victory, who then promoted him to colonel in the French army. He came back to Scotland in March on the Hazard sloop, which was forced ashore by four warships at Tongue in Sutherland, where Lord Reay and his militia captured the passengers and crew.

[420] Probably William Maxwell of Carruchan, Kirkcudbrightshire, who acted as chief engineer in the defence of Carlisle against the Duke of Cumberland.

[420] Probably William Maxwell of Carruchan, Kirkcudbrightshire, who served as the chief engineer in the defense of Carlisle against the Duke of Cumberland.

[421] See ante, pp. 173, 187. Whatever may have been expected or mentioned verbally, Cumberland’s written conditions were: ‘All the terms H.R.H. will or can grant to the rebel garrison at Carlisle are that they shall not be put to the sword, but be reserved for the king’s pleasure.’

[421] See ante, pp. 173, 187. No matter what was anticipated or discussed verbally, Cumberland’s written terms were: ‘The only terms H.R.H. will or can offer to the rebel garrison at Carlisle are that they won’t be executed, but will be held for the king’s decision.’

[422] Lord George Murray was criticised at the time, even by his friends, for being on foot fighting with his men instead of being on horseback as a general watching the action and controlling events. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 376.) Criticism was also extended to other generals and staff-officers, particularly to O’Sullivan, who was never seen during the action and was accused of cowardice.

[422] Lord George Murray faced criticism at the time, even from his friends, for fighting on foot alongside his men instead of riding a horse like a general, overseeing the action and managing events. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 376.) Other generals and staff officers also received criticism, notably O’Sullivan, who was rarely seen during the battle and was accused of being cowardly.

[423] Sir Robert Munro of Foulis, 24th baron and 5th bart.; b. 1684; suc. 1729; M.P. for Wick Burghs 1710-41. His mother was an aunt of Duncan Forbes of Culloden. Entered the army early, and was captain in the Royal Scots by 1705; served under Marlborough in Flanders, where he made a lifelong friendship with Colonel Gardiner (killed at Prestonpans); a commissioner of the Forfeited Estates Commission 1716-40; appointed lieut.-colonel and commandant of the new Highland Regiment (Black Watch) when embodied 1740; fought at Fontenoy; promoted in June 1745 to be colonel in the 37th (now the Hampshire Regiment), which he commanded at Falkirk.

[423] Sir Robert Munro of Foulis, 24th baron and 5th bart.; born 1684; succeeded in 1729; M.P. for Wick Burghs from 1710 to 1741. His mother was an aunt of Duncan Forbes of Culloden. He joined the army early and became a captain in the Royal Scots by 1705; served under Marlborough in Flanders, where he built a lifelong friendship with Colonel Gardiner (who was killed at Prestonpans); was a commissioner of the Forfeited Estates Commission from 1716 to 1740; appointed lieutenant-colonel and commandant of the new Highland Regiment (Black Watch) when it was formed in 1740; fought at Fontenoy; promoted to colonel in June 1745 in the 37th (now the Hampshire Regiment), which he led at Falkirk.

Dr. Duncan Munro (b. 1687), Sir Robert’s brother, had been a doctor in India but retired home in 1726. He accompanied his brother from fraternal affection in the hope of being of use to him, for the colonel was very corpulent.

Dr. Duncan Munro (b. 1687), Sir Robert’s brother, had been a doctor in India but retired back home in 1726. He joined his brother out of brotherly love, hoping to help him, as the colonel was quite overweight.

For George of Culcairn, a third brother, who fell a victim in ’46, see ante, p. 103.

For George of Culcairn, the third brother who died in ’46, see ante, p. 103.

[424] I am not aware of any ministers killed, though there may have been some in the Glasgow and Paisley volunteer or militia regiments, which suffered severely. In the Glasgow regiment, commanded by the Earl of Home, was John Home, afterwards celebrated as author of Douglas and of a History of the Rebellion. He was lieutenant, and during the battle in command of a company of Edinburgh volunteers. Home with several other volunteers was taken prisoner and lodged in Doune Castle. One of the prisoners was the Rev. John Witherspoon (1723-94), then minister of Beith, near Paisley; afterwards in 1768 president of Princeton College, New Jersey, a leader in the American Revolution, and a very active member of the first congress of the United States. Home gives a graphic account of their escape in his history. Later in the year Home became minister of Athelstaneford in East Lothian.

[424] I don't know of any ministers who were killed, though there may have been some in the Glasgow and Paisley volunteer or militia regiments, which were hit hard. In the Glasgow regiment, led by the Earl of Home, was John Home, who later became famous as the author of Douglas and a History of the Rebellion. He was a lieutenant and was in charge of a company of Edinburgh volunteers during the battle. Home and several other volunteers were captured and taken to Doune Castle. One of the prisoners was the Rev. John Witherspoon (1723-94), who was the minister of Beith, near Paisley, and later became president of Princeton College in New Jersey in 1768, a key figure in the American Revolution, and a very active member of the first Congress of the United States. Home provides a vivid account of their escape in his history. Later that year, Home became the minister of Athelstaneford in East Lothian.

[425] Lockhart was a major in Cholmondeley’s regiment, the 34th (now the Border Regiment). He was taken prisoner at Falkirk and released on parole. After Culloden he especially distinguished himself by extraordinary barbarity and the perpetration of terrible cruelties on the hunted fugitives. For instances refer to the Lyon in Mourning.

[425] Lockhart was a major in Cholmondeley’s regiment, the 34th (now the Border Regiment). He was captured at Falkirk and released on parole. After Culloden, he notably distinguished himself with extreme brutality and committed horrific acts against the fleeing survivors. For examples, see the Lyon in Mourning.

[426] Every man of common sense who has the least Idea of Military Matters must well know that, where there is only a small Body of Cavalry attached to an army of light Infantry, as in this case, such Cavalry must be inevitably harrassed because there are not many bodies of horse to relieve each other. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.]

[426] Every person with common sense who has even a basic understanding of military matters knows that when there’s only a small group of cavalry with an army of light infantry, like in this situation, that cavalry is bound to be constantly pressured because there aren't enough horses to take turns. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.]

[427] A village between Stirling and Bannockburn; spelt St. Ninians, but locally pronounced St. Ringans.

[427] A village located between Stirling and Bannockburn; spelled St. Ninians, but locally pronounced St. Ringans.

[428] John Baggot, see ante, p. 150.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ John Baggot, see previous, p. 150.

[429] See ante, p. 101.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See p. 101.

[430] Gordon Castle.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gordon Castle.

[431] See ante, p. 151.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 151.

[432] This is a vague and incorrect report, probably the camp rumour, of Lord George Murray’s doings at this time. By a remarkable secret march from Inverness, he simultaneously surprised, on 17th March, a large number of military posts garrisoned by the Government militia in Perthshire, taking 300 prisoners. He then laid siege to Blair Castle, defended by Sir Andrew Agnew, but his guns were too small to hurt the old castle. He probably would have starved out the garrison, but the advance of Cumberland’s army caused his recall to Inverness.

[432] This is an unclear and inaccurate report, likely just a rumor from the camp, about Lord George Murray’s actions during this time. Through a remarkable secret march from Inverness, he unexpectedly attacked several military posts held by the Government militia in Perthshire on March 17th, capturing 300 prisoners. He then laid siege to Blair Castle, which was defended by Sir Andrew Agnew, but his cannons were too small to damage the old castle. He probably could have starved out the garrison, but the approach of Cumberland’s army led to his recall to Inverness.

[433] This being from an enemy is perhaps the most flattering tribute to President Forbes’s achievement for his Government.

[433] This coming from an opponent is probably the greatest compliment to President Forbes’s accomplishment for his administration.

[434] Cf. post, p. 364.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 364.

[435] See ante, p. 155.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 155.

[436] See ante, p. 157.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See ante, p. 157.

[437] Cumberland left Aberdeen on 8th April.

[437] Cumberland left Aberdeen on April 8th.

[438] Lady Catherine Gordon, daughter of the 2nd Earl of Aberdeen.

[438] Lady Catherine Gordon, daughter of the 2nd Earl of Aberdeen.

[439] See post, p. 230.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 230.

[440] 15th April.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ April 15.

[441] This is a calumny founded on ignorance of what was passing at a distance from the local situation of the writer—Lord George was leading the van to the attack of the Enemy’s Camp, which would have been surprised if the rear division had not hung back, and retarded the advance of the van ’till it was too late to storm. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.]

[441] This is a falsehood based on a lack of understanding of what was happening far away from the writer's location—Lord George was leading the charge to attack the enemy's camp, which could have been caught off guard if the rear division hadn't held back and delayed the advance of the front until it was too late to launch an attack. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.]

[442] The fact was directly the Reverse—Lord George had used every endeavour to induce the Prince to cross the River, and occupy strong ground which Brigadier Stapleton[656] and Colonel Kerr[657] had examined two days before at his Lordships desire. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.][658]

[442] The reality was the opposite—Lord George had done everything he could to persuade the Prince to cross the river and take control of the strong position that Brigadier Stapleton[656] and Colonel Kerr[657] had checked out two days earlier at his Lordship's request. [Note in the Drummond Castle MS.][658]

[443] Ruthven in Badenoch, on the east side of the Spey, near Kingussie.

[443] Ruthven in Badenoch, on the east side of the Spey, close to Kingussie.

[444] Daniel is a little out in his recollection of time. Culloden was fought on 16th April, while he left Scotland on 4th May (see p. 223), only eighteen days after the battle.

[444] Daniel has a slightly off memory of dates. Culloden was fought on April 16th, while he left Scotland on May 4th (see p. 223), just eighteen days after the battle.

[445] This gold was 40,000 louis d’ors. Part of it, ‘Cluny’s Treasure,’ was concealed in Loch Arkaig, and left there for nine years under the care of Cluny Macpherson.

[445] This gold was 40,000 louis d’ors. Some of it, known as ‘Cluny’s Treasure,’ was hidden in Loch Arkaig and kept there for nine years under the watch of Cluny Macpherson.

[446] The British ships were the Greyhound, the Baltimore, and the Terror. (S. M., viii. 238.)

[446] The British ships were the Greyhound, the Baltimore, and the Terror. (S. M., viii. 238.)

[447] William Harrison, a native of Strathbogie, who, when most of his brethren had been taken prisoner or driven from their charges, went to the sheriff of Argyllshire, ‘told him frankly that he was a Catholic priest, but had neither done nor meant harm to anybody, and begged protection. The sheriff was well pleased with his confidence, and gave him a paper signed by himself requiring of everybody to allow him to go about his lawful business unmolested. In consequence of this, Mr. Harrison, in the summers of 1746 and 1747, visited almost all the Catholics in the Highlands, administering the sacraments, and exhorting the people to patience and perseverance in the faith.’ (Bishop Geddes’s MS.)

[447] William Harrison, a native of Strathbogie, who, when most of his fellow clergy had been captured or forced away from their parishes, went to the sheriff of Argyllshire. He told him openly that he was a Catholic priest, but had not harmed anyone and asked for protection. The sheriff appreciated his honesty and gave him a signed document that required everyone to let him go about his lawful duties without interference. As a result, Mr. Harrison, during the summers of 1746 and 1747, visited nearly all the Catholics in the Highlands, administering the sacraments and encouraging the people to remain patient and steadfast in their faith. (Bishop Geddes’s MS.)

[448] The ships left Lochnanuagh on May 4th. (L. in M., iii. 383; Scots Mag., viii. 239.)

[448] The ships left Lochnanuagh on May 4th. (L. in M., iii. 383; Scots Mag., viii. 239.)

[449] Son of Thomas Sheridan, a fellow of Trinity College, Dublin, D.C.L. (Oxon.) and F.R.S., an Irish Protestant who followed James II. into exile and became his private secretary. His wife (it is said) was a natural daughter of the king. The son, Sir Thomas, who was a Catholic, was engaged in the ’15; appointed tutor to Prince Charles 1724 or ’25, and created a baronet ’26. Attended the Prince at the siege of Gaeta ’34. In April ’44 after the abandonment of the French invasion the Prince asked for him, and his father reluctantly sent Sheridan to France, warning his son to be careful in his dealings with him. Sheridan accompanied the Prince to Scotland and acted as his private secretary throughout the campaign. On arrival in France in ’46 he was summoned to Rome by the Chevalier; accused of deserting the Prince but exhibited his written orders to leave. He died at Rome a few months later, his death being variously attributed to mortification at the Chevalier’s reproaches, or to grief at the Prince’s disasters.

[449] Son of Thomas Sheridan, a fellow of Trinity College, Dublin, D.C.L. (Oxon.) and F.R.S., an Irish Protestant who followed James II. into exile and became his private secretary. His wife (it is said) was a natural daughter of the king. The son, Sir Thomas, who was a Catholic, was involved in the ’15; appointed tutor to Prince Charles in 1724 or ’25, and made a baronet in ’26. He was with the Prince during the siege of Gaeta in ’34. In April ’44, after the French invasion was abandoned, the Prince requested him, and his father hesitantly sent Sheridan to France, cautioning his son to be careful in his interactions with him. Sheridan accompanied the Prince to Scotland and served as his private secretary throughout the campaign. Upon arriving in France in ’46, he was summoned to Rome by the Chevalier; he was accused of abandoning the Prince but showed his written orders to leave. He died in Rome a few months later, with his death being attributed variously to distress over the Chevalier’s criticisms or to sorrow over the Prince’s troubles.

[450] He had accompanied the Marquis d’Eguilles to Scotland as interpreter.

[450] He had gone to Scotland with the Marquis d’Eguilles to serve as an interpreter.

[451] John Hay of Restalrig, near Edinburgh, brother of Thomas Hay, Lord Huntington, who married the sister of John Murray of Broughton (see p. 49). He was an Edinburgh Writer to the Signet, admitted 1726; Substitute-Keeper of the Signet 1725-41 and 1742-46; fiscal 1732-34; treasurer 1736-46. He acted as treasurer to the Prince, and when Murray of Broughton fell ill at Inverness in March he succeeded him as Secretary. Lord George Murray attributed much of the disaster of Culloden to his neglect or inefficiency in provisioning the army, a duty which Murray had always performed well. Hay held a colonel’s commission in the Jacobite army. He attached himself to Prince Charles after leaving Scotland, became major-domo of his household when he went to Rome after his father’s death in 1766; created a Jacobite baronet in that year; dismissed in 1768; returned to Scotland 1771; died 1784.

[451] John Hay of Restalrig, near Edinburgh, brother of Thomas Hay, Lord Huntington, who married the sister of John Murray of Broughton (see p. 49). He was an Edinburgh Writer to the Signet, admitted in 1726; Substitute Keeper of the Signet from 1725 to 1741 and again from 1742 to 1746; fiscal from 1732 to 1734; treasurer from 1736 to 1746. He served as treasurer to the Prince, and when Murray of Broughton got sick in Inverness in March, he took over as Secretary. Lord George Murray blamed him for much of the disaster at Culloden due to his neglect or ineffectiveness in supplying the army, a responsibility that Murray had always managed well. Hay held a colonel’s commission in the Jacobite army. He joined Prince Charles after leaving Scotland, became the major-domo of his household when he went to Rome after his father's death in 1766; created a Jacobite baronet that year; dismissed in 1768; returned to Scotland in 1771; died in 1784.

[452] Alexander Macleod, an Edinburgh advocate, was aide-de-camp to the Prince throughout the campaign. His father, John, also an advocate, was a grandson of Sir Norman Macleod of Bernera, and was a first cousin of Lady Clanranald. He had purchased Muiravonside in Stirlingshire, two miles from Linlithgow. Alexander was sent from Edinburgh in September to summon to the Prince’s standard Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat and Macleod of Macleod, both his near kinsmen. This mission, in which he failed owing to the stronger influence of Duncan Forbes, brought on him the special anger of the Government. He was attainted, and for thirty-two years he wandered in the wildest regions of the Western Highlands and Islands. He received a pardon in 1778, and died in 1784. He was in Raasay when Dr. Johnson and Boswell visited that island in September 1773. He was generally known as Sandie Macleod in the Islands, and had also acquired the nickname of M‘Cruslick, signifying a cross between Proteus and Don Quixote. He possessed the most boisterous spirits, which delighted Johnson and irritated Boswell.

[452] Alexander Macleod, a lawyer from Edinburgh, served as aide-de-camp to the Prince throughout the campaign. His father, John, also a lawyer, was a grandson of Sir Norman Macleod of Bernera and was a first cousin of Lady Clanranald. He bought Muiravonside in Stirlingshire, just two miles from Linlithgow. Alexander was sent from Edinburgh in September to invite Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat and Macleod of Macleod, both his close relatives, to join the Prince’s cause. He failed in this mission due to Duncan Forbes’s stronger influence, which led to significant resentment from the Government. He was declared an outlaw, and for thirty-two years, he wandered through the remote areas of the Western Highlands and Islands. He received a pardon in 1778 and died in 1784. He was in Raasay when Dr. Johnson and Boswell visited the island in September 1773. He was generally known as Sandie Macleod in the Islands and also gained the nickname M‘Cruslick, which meant a mix of Proteus and Don Quixote. He had a lively personality that amused Johnson and frustrated Boswell.

[453] See post, p. 230, n. 2.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 230, n. 2.

[454] Allan Macdowell is a mistake for Macdonell or rather Macdonald, as his name is afterwards correctly spelled. He was a ‘native of the Isles’ and a clansman of Clanranald’s; he went out with the clan as chaplain when the standard was raised, and continued with the army until the end of the campaign. He also acted as confessor to the Prince. He and Æneas M‘Gillis, the chaplain of Glengarry’s men, were the only priests that accompanied the Highlanders to Prestonpans. They wore the Highland dress, with sword and pistol, and were styled captains. At the battle of Falkirk Mr. Macdonald rode along the line and gave his blessing, which the Catholics received kneeling. From Culloden he accompanied the Prince in his flight and in the earlier part of his wanderings, leaving him at Scalpa. Later on he was apprehended in South Uist, and sent with some other priests to London in Ferguson’s ship the Furness. He and four other clergymen were examined by the Duke of Newcastle, who informed them that they might leave the country on finding bail for £1000 each not to return. They pointed out that the bail was quite beyond their power, on which the Duke smilingly replied that they were honest men and he would take each man’s bail for the other. Macdonald went to Paris, and in 1748 to Rome, where he lived for many years. (Bishop Geddes’s MS.) I do not know if he ever returned.

[454] Allan Macdowell is a mistake for Macdonell or rather Macdonald, as his name is later correctly spelled. He was a "native of the Isles" and a clansman of Clanranald’s; he joined the clan as their chaplain when the standard was raised and stayed with the army until the campaign ended. He also served as the Prince's confessor. He and Æneas M‘Gillis, the chaplain for Glengarry’s men, were the only priests who accompanied the Highlanders to Prestonpans. They wore Highland dress, with sword and pistol, and were called captains. At the battle of Falkirk, Mr. Macdonald rode along the line and gave his blessing, which the Catholics received while kneeling. From Culloden, he joined the Prince in his escape and during the early part of his wanderings, leaving him at Scalpa. Later, he was captured in South Uist and sent with some other priests to London on Ferguson’s ship the Furness. He and four other clergymen were questioned by the Duke of Newcastle, who told them they could leave the country if they could find £1000 bail each to not return. They explained that the bail amount was beyond their means, to which the Duke smiled and said he would take each man’s bail for the others. Macdonald went to Paris and then to Rome in 1748, where he lived for many years. (Bishop Geddes’s MS.) I do not know if he ever returned.

[455] Sic in N. M. Mag. Most likely an error caused by careless transcription and meant to read, ‘to Gortlick’s house [not horge] a gentleman of the name of Thomas Fraser.’ Gortlick, more generally spelt Gortuleg, belonged to Thomas Fraser, a cadet of Lovat’s. It was in this house and on this occasion that Prince Charles had his memorable meeting with Lord Lovat which is dramatically described by Mrs. Grant of Laggan. (See Wariston’s Diary and Other Papers, p. 265, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxvi.)

[455] Thus in N. M. Mag. Probably a mistake from careless copying and should say, ‘to Gortlick’s house [not horge] a gentleman named Thomas Fraser.’ Gortlick, more commonly spelled Gortuleg, belonged to Thomas Fraser, a relative of Lovat’s. It was at this house and during this occasion that Prince Charles had his famous meeting with Lord Lovat, which is vividly recounted by Mrs. Grant of Laggan. (See Wariston’s Diary and Other Papers, p. 265, Scot. Hist. Soc., vol. xxvi.)

[456] Stratherrick.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stratherrick.

[457] Neil, who at this period is writing from hearsay, is quite wrong here. Glengarry was not at home and the house was ‘without meat, drink, fire or candle, except some firr-sticks!’ Had Ned Bourke not netted a couple of salmon, there would have been nothing to eat. (L. in M., i. 89, 191.)

[457] Neil, who is writing based on what he's heard, is completely mistaken here. Glengarry wasn't home, and the house was 'without food, drink, fire, or candles, except for some fir sticks!' If Ned Bourke hadn't caught a couple of salmon, there would have been nothing to eat. (L. in M., i. 89, 191.)

[458] Angus MacEachain (or Macdonald) was a son-in-law of Angus Macdonald of Borradale. He had served in the campaign as a surgeon in Glengarry’s regiment.

[458] Angus MacEachain (or Macdonald) was the son-in-law of Angus Macdonald of Borradale. He had worked as a surgeon in Glengarry’s regiment during the campaign.

The family of MacEachain-Macdonald of Drimindarach, Arisaig, was a branch of the Clanranalds, descended from Eachain (or Hector), a younger son of Roderick, 2nd Clanranald. Neil MacEachain was of the MacEachains of Howbeg, a junior branch of the sept. Both families have long since resumed their earlier name, Macdonald, dropping the name MacEachain.

The MacEachain-Macdonald family from Drimindarach, Arisaig, was part of the Clanranalds, tracing their roots back to Eachain (or Hector), a younger son of Roderick, the 2nd Clanranald. Neil MacEachain belonged to the MacEachains of Howbeg, a smaller branch of the clan. Both families have long since returned to their original name, Macdonald, and no longer use the name MacEachain.

[459] This was the Prince’s second visit to Borradale House on Lochnanuagh. It was here he stayed on his first landing in July 1745. He came again to Borradale in July 1746, after his wanderings in the Hebrides, by which time the house had been burned down by Cumberland’s soldiers; he finally returned to Borradale on 19th September, whence he sailed for France the following day. Angus Macdonald, the tacksman of Borradale, was a son of the 5th laird of Glenaladale, a cadet of Clanranald’s, and was a first cousin of Flora Macdonald. Borradale’s descendant, Colonel John Andrew Macdonald, is to-day laird of Glenaladale.

[459] This was the Prince’s second visit to Borradale House on Lochnanuagh. He stayed here during his first arrival in July 1745. He came back to Borradale in July 1746, after traveling through the Hebrides, by which time the house had been burned down by Cumberland’s soldiers; he ultimately returned to Borradale on September 19th, from where he sailed to France the next day. Angus Macdonald, the tacksman of Borradale, was the son of the 5th laird of Glenaladale, a branch of Clanranald, and was a first cousin of Flora Macdonald. Borradale’s descendant, Colonel John Andrew Macdonald, is now the laird of Glenaladale.

[460] Captain Felix O’Neille, born at Rome, son of a brigadier in the Spanish service. He served in the Spanish army until 1744, when he joined Lally’s French-Irish regiment as captain. Was sent to Scotland with despatches from the Duc de Richelieu in March 1746. After Culloden he accompanied Prince Charles during the first two months of his wanderings and shared his discomforts. He was captured in Benbecula by Captain John Ferguson of the Furness. He was confined in Edinburgh Castle until February 1747, when he was released on parole and subsequently exchanged (Scots Mag., ix. 92). He wrote a journal of his wanderings, which is printed in The Lyon, i. 102, 365.

[460] Captain Felix O’Neille, born in Rome, was the son of a brigadier in the Spanish military. He served in the Spanish army until 1744, when he joined Lally’s French-Irish regiment as a captain. He was sent to Scotland with dispatches from the Duc de Richelieu in March 1746. After the Battle of Culloden, he accompanied Prince Charles during the first two months of his travels and shared in his hardships. He was captured in Benbecula by Captain John Ferguson of the Furness. He was held in Edinburgh Castle until February 1747, when he was released on parole and later exchanged (Scots Mag., ix. 92). He wrote a journal of his travels, which is published in The Lyon, i. 102, 365.

[461] John William O’Sullivan; b. in Co. Kerry, 1700; educated in France and Rome for the priesthood, and, it is said (Fielding’s True Patriot), took orders. Entered the family of Maréchal de Maillebois as tutor, afterwards secretary. Joined the French army and served under Maillebois in Corsica; afterwards in Italy and on the Rhine. Recommended to D’Argenson as an officer ‘who understood the irregular art of war better than any other man in Europe, nor was his knowledge in the regular much inferior to that of the best general living.’ Entered the household of Prince Charles about 1744; accompanied him to Scotland and acted as adjutant-general, as well as private adviser, during the campaign. Was with the Prince in his wanderings until 20th June. Escaped to France in a French cutter. Knighted by the Chevalier about Christmas 1746, and created by him a baronet of Ireland 1753. Date of death not ascertained.

[461] John William O’Sullivan; born in County Kerry, 1700; educated in France and Rome for the priesthood, and, it is said (Fielding’s True Patriot), was ordained. Joined the family of Maréchal de Maillebois as a tutor and later became his secretary. He joined the French army and served under Maillebois in Corsica, then in Italy and on the Rhine. He was recommended to D’Argenson as an officer “who understood the irregular art of war better than anyone else in Europe, nor was his knowledge in the regular much inferior to that of the best general alive.” He became part of Prince Charles’ household around 1744; accompanied him to Scotland and served as adjutant-general and private advisor during the campaign. He was with the Prince in his wanderings until June 20. He escaped to France on a French cutter. He was knighted by the Chevalier around Christmas 1746, and was made a baronet of Ireland by him in 1753. Date of death is not known.

[462] Donald Macleod of Gualtergil, on Dunvegan Loch, Skye, the faithful ‘Palinurus’ of Prince Charles from 21st April to 20th June. He was captured in Benbecula in July, and taken to London in Ferguson’s ship; released June ’47; died at Gualtergil in May ’49, aged 72. His wife was a sister of Macdonald of Borradale and a first cousin of Flora Macdonald.

[462] Donald Macleod of Gualtergil, on Dunvegan Loch, Skye, the loyal 'Palinurus' of Prince Charles from April 21 to June 20. He was captured in Benbecula in July and taken to London on Ferguson's ship; released in June '47; died at Gualtergil in May '49, at the age of 72. His wife was a sister of Macdonald of Borradale and a first cousin of Flora Macdonald.

[463] It seems absurd to write of seizing the boat and stealing away. In addition to the Prince’s five attendants, O’Sullivan, O’Neil, Allan Macdonald, Ned Bourke, and Donald Macleod, there was a crew of seven boatmen, probably the servants of Borradale who must have known. It is true, however, that the Prince’s intended departure was concealed from most of the Jacobite officers assembled in Arisaig.

[463] It seems crazy to talk about taking the boat and sneaking away. Along with the Prince’s five attendants, O’Sullivan, O’Neil, Allan Macdonald, Ned Bourke, and Donald Macleod, there was a crew of seven boatmen, likely the servants of Borradale, who must have known. It’s true, though, that most of the Jacobite officers gathered in Arisaig were kept in the dark about the Prince’s planned departure.

[464] Neil is right as to the day of the week, but wrong as to the day of the month. It should be Sunday, 27th April. See Itinerary.

[464] Neil is correct about the day of the week, but he's wrong about the date. It should be Sunday, April 27th. See Itinerary.

[465] Rev. John Macaulay, son of the Rev. Aulay Macaulay, minister of Harris, was ordained parish minister of South Uist in May 1745. He was subsequently minister of Lismore and Appin 1755; Inverary 1765, and finally of Cardross 1775. He died 1789. At Inveraray he had a good deal of intercourse with Dr. Johnson in 1773, duly recorded by Boswell in the Tour to the Hebrides. John Macaulay was the father of Zachary Macaulay, and grandfather of Lord Macaulay.

[465] Rev. John Macaulay, son of Rev. Aulay Macaulay, the minister of Harris, was appointed parish minister of South Uist in May 1745. He later served as the minister of Lismore and Appin in 1755; Inveraray in 1765, and finally Cardross in 1775. He passed away in 1789. While in Inveraray, he had quite a bit of interaction with Dr. Johnson in 1773, which was noted by Boswell in the Tour to the Hebrides. John Macaulay was the father of Zachary Macaulay and the grandfather of Lord Macaulay.

[466] i.e. Neil MacEachain.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ i.e. Neil MacEachain.

[467] Rev. Aulay Macaulay, formerly of Tyree; appointed to Harris 1712; died 1758; aged about eighty-five.

[467] Rev. Aulay Macaulay, who was previously from Tyree; appointed to Harris in 1712; passed away in 1758; at the age of about eighty-five.

[468] Rev. Colin Mackenzie was not minister of Stornoway but of Lochs, the parish to the south of Stornoway.

[468] Rev. Colin Mackenzie wasn’t the minister of Stornoway; he was the minister of Lochs, the parish south of Stornoway.

[469] Should be 30th April.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ should be April 30th.

[470] Donald Campbell was the brother-in-law of Hugh Macdonald of Baleshare and of Donald Roy Macdonald, the former of whom is mentioned later on; the latter, though of the family of Sleat, had served in Glengarry’s regiment. Donald Roy took over charge of the Prince when he said farewell to Flora Macdonald at Portree in Skye. (L. in M., ii. 21.) An anecdote of Campbell’s fidelity to the Prince when he protected him against a party headed by Aulay Macaulay the minister is given in the Itinerary. Neil MacEachain does not love Donald Campbell, but Ned Bourke, who was one of the party, calls him ‘one of the best, honestest fellows that ever drew breath.’ (L. in M., i. 191.)

[470] Donald Campbell was the brother-in-law of Hugh Macdonald from Baleshare and Donald Roy Macdonald. The former is mentioned later; the latter, although from the Sleat family, had served in Glengarry’s regiment. Donald Roy took charge of the Prince when he said goodbye to Flora Macdonald at Portree in Skye. (L. in M., ii. 21.) An account of Campbell’s loyalty to the Prince, when he protected him from a group led by Aulay Macaulay the minister, is found in the Itinerary. Neil MacEachain doesn't have a good opinion of Donald Campbell, but Ned Bourke, who was part of the group, calls him 'one of the best, most honest guys that ever lived.' (L. in M., i. 191.)

[471] Lady Kildin should be spelt Kildun. This lady was the wife of Colin Mackenzie of Kildun, a grandson of the 2nd Earl of Seaforth. Mackenzie’s sister was the second wife of Donald, 16th Clanranald, the mother of Macdonald of Boisdale, and stepmother of old Clanranald of the ’45. From private letters belonging to Frances, Lady Muir Mackenzie, I find that Colin Mackenzie was then in London.

[471] Lady Kildin should be spelled Kildun. She was the wife of Colin Mackenzie of Kildun, who was a grandson of the 2nd Earl of Seaforth. Mackenzie’s sister was the second wife of Donald, the 16th Clanranald, the mother of Macdonald of Boisdale, and the stepmother of old Clanranald from the ’45. From private letters belonging to Frances, Lady Muir Mackenzie, I find that Colin Mackenzie was in London at that time.

[472] Neil MacEachain is all wrong here in the sequence of events and in his dates. He was writing from hearsay only. The true sequence will be found with authorities for the same in the Itinerary, pp. 48-50.

[472] Neil MacEachain is completely off with the order of events and his dates. He was just relying on what others said. The real sequence can be found with the sources in the Itinerary, pp. 48-50.

[473] A quarter of a peck of oatmeal not threshed, but burnt out of the ear.

[473] A quarter of a peck of oatmeal that hasn't been threshed, but is burnt right out of the ear.

[474] This was strictly in accordance with Hebridean honesty, continued to this day. The Prince desired to leave money on the rocks to pay for the fish, but O’Sullivan and O’Neille (not the islanders) dissuaded him. Cf. L. in M., i. 172.

[474] This was perfectly in line with the honesty that remains a hallmark of the Hebrides. The Prince wanted to leave some money on the rocks to pay for the fish, but O'Sullivan and O'Neille (not the islanders) talked him out of it. Cf. L. in M., i. 172.

[475] Prince Charles landed in Benbecula, Clanranald’s island, on 11th May, and from this time onward Neil writes from knowledge, not hearsay.

[475] Prince Charles arrived in Benbecula, Clanranald’s island, on May 11, and from this point on, Neil writes from experience, not rumor.

[476] South Uist.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ South Uist.

[477] Ranald was afterwards taken prisoner and sent to London.

[477] Ranald was later captured and taken to London.

[478] Corradale is a picturesque valley situated in the mountainous part of South Uist, which occupies the middle of the east side of the island, whose northern, western, and southern confines are wonderfully flat. Corradale lies about the middle of this district, running north-west from the sea, between the mountains Hekla and Benmore, each about 2000 feet high. If approached by sea it was easy for a fugitive to get away to inaccessible hiding-places in the mountains, while if attacked from the land he could escape by sea. Prince Charles’s lodging was a forester’s house not far from the shore. On the north side of the glen, close to the sea, there is a fairly commodious cave, traditionally but erroneously the dwelling-place of the Prince. This cave was probably the rock under which Neil left the Prince while he looked for strangers. Considering the weather to be expected in this island, there can be little doubt that the Prince often sat there for shelter while he looked out for passing ships, as the cave commands an excellent view of the offing to the south-east.

[478] Corradale is a beautiful valley located in the mountainous region of South Uist, which is in the middle of the east side of the island. The northern, western, and southern edges of the island are incredibly flat. Corradale runs about halfway through this area, stretching northwest from the sea, nestled between the mountains Hekla and Benmore, both around 2000 feet tall. If someone approached by sea, it was easy for a fugitive to slip away to hard-to-reach hiding spots in the mountains, while if they were attacked from land, escaping by sea was a possibility. Prince Charles stayed in a forester’s house not far from the shore. On the north side of the glen, near the sea, there's a fairly spacious cave, which is mistakenly thought to be where the Prince lived. This cave was likely the rock where Neil left the Prince while he searched for strangers. Given the weather usually found on this island, it’s very likely that the Prince often sheltered there while watching for passing ships, as the cave provides a great view of the ocean to the southeast.

[479] The actual stay at Corradale was from 14th May to 5th June, although the Prince was in South Uist until 24th June. For details, see the Itinerary.

[479] The actual time spent at Corradale was from May 14th to June 5th, although the Prince was in South Uist until June 24th. For details, see the Itinerary.

[480] See ante, p. 213, and Introduction.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See before, p. 213, and Introduction.

[481] Moidart.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Moidart.

[482] In Ordnance Survey Glen Quoich, to the west of Loch Garry. I have no knowledge of the actions here referred to.

[482] In Ordnance Survey Glen Quoich, west of Loch Garry. I'm not aware of the actions mentioned here.

[483] Donald Macdonald, second son of Clanranald, served as captain in his brother ‘Young Clanranald’s’ regiment throughout the campaign. His mother was Margaret, d. of William Macleod of Luskintyre, son of Sir Norman Macleod of Bernera, and Catherine, d. of Sir James ‘Mor’ Macdonald of Sleat, 2nd bart. Donald’s uncle, Alexander Macleod, was at this time laird of Luskintyre in Harris. Donald was afterwards captured and imprisoned in Edinburgh Castle, but discharged without trial. In 1756 he joined Fraser’s Highlanders (the Master of Lovat’s); fought with Wolfe at Quebec and was killed in a subsequent action.

[483] Donald Macdonald, the second son of Clanranald, was a captain in his brother ‘Young Clanranald’s’ regiment during the campaign. His mother was Margaret, daughter of William Macleod of Luskintyre, who was the son of Sir Norman Macleod of Bernera, and Catherine, daughter of Sir James ‘Mor’ Macdonald of Sleat, 2nd baronet. Donald’s uncle, Alexander Macleod, was the laird of Luskintyre in Harris at that time. Later, Donald was captured and imprisoned in Edinburgh Castle, but was released without a trial. In 1756, he joined Fraser’s Highlanders (the Master of Lovat’s); fought alongside Wolfe at Quebec, and was killed in a later battle.

[484] i.e. Boisdale.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ e.g. Boisdale.

[485] Hugh Macdonald of Baleshare, an island to the south-west of North Uist, was of the Sleat family, his father being a natural son of Sir James ‘Mor,’ 2nd bart., and his mother a daughter of the 13th Clanranald. As Sir Alexander of Sleat and Lady Clanranald were both great-grandchildren of Sir James ‘Mor,’ they were nearly related to Baleshare, being in the Scots phrase ‘first-cousins once removed.’ Baleshare’s sister was the wife of Donald Campbell, the Prince’s host in Scalpa. Hugh of Baleshare had been sent to South Uist by Lady Margaret Macdonald, the wife of Sir Alexander of Sleat then in attendance on Cumberland at Fort Augustus, while his men were out against the broken Jacobites. Lady Margaret had sent Baleshare secretly with money and little luxuries to relieve the Prince’s discomfort and to help him generally. At one time it was proposed that Baleshare should conceal Prince Charles in his own island, but the scheme was abandoned as it might compromise his chief, Sir Alexander.

[485] Hugh Macdonald of Baleshare, an island southwest of North Uist, was from the Sleat family. His father was a natural son of Sir James 'Mor,' the 2nd baronet, and his mother was a daughter of the 13th Clanranald. Since Sir Alexander of Sleat and Lady Clanranald were both great-grandchildren of Sir James 'Mor,' they were closely related to Baleshare, being, in Scottish terms, 'first cousins once removed.' Baleshare’s sister was married to Donald Campbell, who hosted the Prince in Scalpa. Hugh of Baleshare had been sent to South Uist by Lady Margaret Macdonald, the wife of Sir Alexander of Sleat, who was attending to Cumberland at Fort Augustus while his men were out fighting the rebellious Jacobites. Lady Margaret secretly sent Baleshare with money and small comforts to ease the Prince’s discomfort and to generally assist him. At one point, there was a plan for Baleshare to hide Prince Charles on his own island, but the idea was dropped as it could jeopardize his chief, Sir Alexander.

[486] This power of drinking seems to have made a great impression. Baleshare told Bishop Forbes that the Prince ‘still had the better of us, and even of Boystill [Boysdale] himself, notwithstanding his being as able a boulman as any in Scotland.’ It is generally assumed that Prince Charles acquired his drinking habits as a result of his hardships in Scotland, yet his anxious father had detected symptoms of an over-fondness for wine even before he left Rome in 1744. In a letter to Colonel O’Bryen (Lord Lismore), his envoy at the French Court, in August 1745, the Old Chevalier writes: ‘La grande vivacité du Prince, son penchant pour toutes sortes de divertissements, et un peu trop de goût qu’il sembloit alors avoir pour le vin, leur ont faire croire faussement qu’ils avoient gagné quelque chose sur son esprit et il devint bientôt par là leur Héros.’ (Stuart Papers, Browne, Hist. of the High., iii. 445.)

[486] This drinking habit seems to have made a big impression. Baleshare told Bishop Forbes that the Prince ‘still had the upper hand over us, and even over Boystill [Boysdale] himself, despite him being as capable a drinker as anyone in Scotland.’ It’s generally believed that Prince Charles developed his drinking habits due to his struggles in Scotland, but his worried father had noticed signs of a strong fondness for wine even before he left Rome in 1744. In a letter to Colonel O’Bryen (Lord Lismore), his envoy at the French Court, in August 1745, the Old Chevalier writes: ‘La grande vivacité du Prince, son penchant pour toutes sortes de divertissements, et un peu trop de goût qu’il sembloit alors avoir pour le vin, leur ont faire croire faussement qu’ils avoient gagné quelque chose sur son esprit et il devint bientôt par là leur Héros.’ (Stuart Papers, Browne, Hist. of the High., iii. 445.)

[487] See post, p. 249, n. 3.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See post, p. 249, n. 3.

[488] Should be Ulinish. He was a first cousin of Sir Alexander Macdonald, whose mother was a Macleod of Greshornish. Alexander Macleod was made sheriff-substitute in Skye in 1773. In 1791 he was alive and in his 100th year.

[488] Should be Ulinish. He was a first cousin of Sir Alexander Macdonald, whose mother was a Macleod of Greshornish. Alexander Macleod was appointed sheriff-substitute in Skye in 1773. By 1791, he was still alive and celebrating his 100th year.

[489] Captain John Ferguson was the fourth son of George Ferguson, one of six brothers, members of a family long resident at Inverurie. The eldest was the celebrated or notorious ‘Ferguson the Plotter’ of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries; other brothers founded the families of Pitfour and Kinmundy. George lived and died at Old Meldrum near Inverurie, so it may be supposed that his son, John, was born there. Nothing is known of his early career, but in 1746 John Ferguson was in command of H.M.S. Furness, (which is always spelt Furnace in the Scottish journals and narratives of the time), and was employed in hunting fugitive Jacobites. He was the ‘black captain’ of the ’45, one of the most active and ruthless of the Government officers. His cruelties are a constant theme in Jacobite annals (see the Lyon from the index). Captain O’Neille, who was one of his prisoners, states that Ferguson used him with the barbarity of a pirate, stripped him, and ordered him to be put into a rack and whipped by his hangman because he would not confess where he thought the Prince was. (L. in M., i. 374.) Ferguson was promoted in the same year, by the express interference and recommendation of the Duke of Cumberland, to be captain of the Nightingale, a new frigate just launched. He died in 1767. (Records of Clan Ferguson, p. 280.) Ferguson’s greatest exploit was the capture of Lord Lovat, which was effected with skill. Lovat had taken refuge in an island on Loch Morar, a fresh-water lake, and had removed all the boats on the loch to the island. Ferguson landed a party, who saw the fugitives, whom they could not reach, and by whom they were greeted with cries of derision. He then sent a boat ashore from his ship, carried it over a mile or so of rugged country, and launched it on Loch Morar. Lovat’s party rowed rapidly up the loch, and got on shore, but after three days’ concealment, the old lord, unable from infirmities to continue the struggle, determined to give himself up, sent word to his pursuers and surrendered to Captain Dugald Campbell of Achacrossan of the Argyll Militia.

[489] Captain John Ferguson was the fourth son of George Ferguson, one of six brothers from a family that had lived in Inverurie for a long time. The oldest brother was the infamous 'Ferguson the Plotter' from the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries; other siblings started the families of Pitfour and Kinmundy. George lived and died at Old Meldrum near Inverurie, so it’s likely that his son, John, was born there. We don’t know much about his early life, but in 1746, John Ferguson was commanding H.M.S. Furness (which is always spelled Furnace in Scottish journals and accounts from that time) and was tasked with hunting down runaway Jacobites. He was the 'black captain' of '45, one of the most active and ruthless government officers. His brutal actions are frequently discussed in Jacobite records (see the Lyon in the index). Captain O’Neille, one of his prisoners, described Ferguson’s treatment of him as cruel, claiming he was stripped and ordered to be racked and whipped by his executioner because he refused to reveal where he thought the Prince was. (L. in M., i. 374.) Later that same year, through the direct intervention and recommendation of the Duke of Cumberland, Ferguson was promoted to captain of the Nightingale, a newly launched frigate. He died in 1767. (Records of Clan Ferguson, p. 280.) Ferguson’s most notable achievement was the capture of Lord Lovat, which he executed skillfully. Lovat had taken refuge on an island in Loch Morar, a freshwater lake, and had removed all boats from the loch to his island. Ferguson landed a team who spotted the fugitives, who they couldn’t reach, and were met with mocking shouts. He then dispatched a boat from his ship, carried it over rugged terrain for about a mile, and launched it on Loch Morar. Lovat’s group rowed quickly up the loch and made it to shore, but after three days of hiding, the old lord, unable to continue due to his frailty, decided to surrender, sent word to his pursuers, and gave himself up to Captain Dugald Campbell of Achacrossan of the Argyll Militia.

[490] Fuyia, which I have corrected from Fugia in the N. M. Maga., as it is a manifest error of the copyist or printer. Fuyia gives the local pronunciation of the name of the island, which is generally spelt Ouia in the Lyon, and Wiay in the Ordnance Survey maps. It is spelt Fouay on p. 253.

[490] Fuyia, which I corrected from Fugia in the N. M. Maga., since it’s a clear mistake by the copyist or printer. Fuyia reflects the local way of saying the island's name, which is usually spelled Ouia in the Lyon, and Wiay on the Ordnance Survey maps. It is spelled Fouay on p. 253.

[491] Alexander Macdonald of Boisdale (Clanranald’s step-brother) was carried prisoner to London, and kept there until July 1747, when he was released.

[491] Alexander Macdonald of Boisdale (Clanranald’s step-brother) was taken prisoner to London and held there until July 1747, when he was released.

[492] This was Boisdale’s third wife, Anne, daughter of Macneil of Barra.

[492] This was Boisdale’s third wife, Anne, the daughter of Macneil of Barra.

[493] Captain Carolina Frederick Scott shares with Ferguson and Lockhart eternal infamy for his superlative cruelty to the hunted Jacobites of the Western Highlands. I found his name and that of Ferguson still perfectly remembered in the Outer Hebrides, and received with execrations. He was an officer of Guise’s regiment, the 6th (now the Royal Warwickshire). His satanic zeal, like Ferguson’s, was rewarded with promotion. In November 1746 he was appointed major in his regiment in the room of Major Wentworth, who was cashiered for surrendering Fort Augustus to the Jacobites (March 5th), when three companies of Guise’s regiment were made prisoners of war.

[493] Captain Carolina Frederick Scott shares a lasting disgrace with Ferguson and Lockhart for his extreme cruelty towards the hunted Jacobites of the Western Highlands. I found that his name and Ferguson's were still well-remembered in the Outer Hebrides, and were met with curses. He was an officer in Guise’s regiment, the 6th (now the Royal Warwickshire). His malicious enthusiasm, like Ferguson’s, was rewarded with a promotion. In November 1746, he was made a major in his regiment, replacing Major Wentworth, who was dismissed for surrendering Fort Augustus to the Jacobites on March 5th, when three companies of Guise’s regiment were taken prisoner.

[494] Meaning Captain O’Neille.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Meaning Captain O’Neill.

[495] This is the Beinchillkoinnich of the Lyon (i. 329), the Beinn Ruigh Choinnich of the Ordnance Survey; a hill on the north side of Loch Boisdale, 900 feet high, from whence the low-lying country of South Uist can be viewed from sea to sea. On the northern spur there is a cave accessible only by a precipitous narrow ledge, where shelter from the weather could be had and an outlook to the Minch. Local tradition associates this cave with the Prince. He possibly took shelter there on this momentous day. South Uist, even in summer, is a very rainy island.

[495] This is the Beinchillkoinnich of the Lyon (i. 329), the Beinn Ruigh Choinnich of the Ordnance Survey; a hill on the north side of Loch Boisdale, 900 feet high, from which you can see the low-lying land of South Uist from sea to sea. On the northern edge, there’s a cave that's only reachable by a steep, narrow ledge, providing shelter from the weather and a view of the Minch. Local legend ties this cave to the Prince, suggesting he took refuge there on that significant day. South Uist is quite a rainy island, even in summer.

[496] Hugh Macdonald of Armadale, in Skye, was Flora Macdonald’s step-father. He was a grandson of Sir James ‘Mor’ Macdonald of Sleat, and was thus a first cousin of Sir Alexander’s father, and of Lady Clanranald’s father, as well as of Baleshare and Mrs. Campbell of Scalpa. He was a captain in one of Sir Alexander Macdonald’s independent companies out against Prince Charles. He had formerly been an officer in the French army. (Henderson’s Life of Cumberland, p. 299.)

[496] Hugh Macdonald of Armadale, in Skye, was Flora Macdonald’s stepfather. He was the grandson of Sir James ‘Mor’ Macdonald of Sleat, making him a first cousin to Sir Alexander’s father, Lady Clanranald’s father, as well as to Baleshare and Mrs. Campbell of Scalpa. He served as a captain in one of Sir Alexander Macdonald’s independent companies fighting against Prince Charles. Previously, he had been an officer in the French army. (Henderson’s Life of Cumberland, p. 299.)

[497] Daughter of Alexander (Montgomerie), 9th Earl of Eglinton. Married as his second wife to Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat; d. 1799.

[497] Daughter of Alexander (Montgomerie), 9th Earl of Eglinton. Married as his second wife to Sir Alexander Macdonald of Sleat; died in 1799.

[498] At Alisary, on the slopes of Sheaval, a hill to the south of Loch Eynort, and rising to the north-east from Flora’s old home of Milton (or Arrivoulin) on the low ground near the ocean. This was the hill pasture of her brother’s farm to which the cattle were driven in summer, while the owners occupied ‘shielings’ or temporary huts in the neighbourhood. It was an excellent place to meet. The western side of the island is a wide belt of dead level links formed by the sand thrown up by the swell of the Atlantic, and known as ‘the Machar.’ No wayfarer on the Machar could easily escape detection even if he were miles away, and it was the night of the full moon. Flora’s shieling was near the western end of the hill region of South Uist, and just about as far west as the Prince could have dared to go without losing the shelter of the hills.

[498] At Alisary, on the slopes of Sheaval, a hill to the south of Loch Eynort, and rising to the northeast from Flora’s old home of Milton (or Arrivoulin) on the low ground near the ocean. This was the hill pasture of her brother’s farm where the cattle were driven in summer, while the owners stayed in ‘shielings’ or temporary huts in the area. It was a great place to meet. The western side of the island is a wide stretch of flat links created by the sand pushed up by the Atlantic swell, known as ‘the Machar.’ Any traveler on the Machar couldn’t easily avoid being noticed, even if they were miles away, and it was the night of the full moon. Flora’s shieling was near the western end of the hill region of South Uist, and just about as far west as the Prince could have risked going without losing the shelter of the hills.

[499] Benbecula, that part of the ‘Long Island’ lying between North and South Uist, and joined to these islands by sea-fords passable only at low tide and thus easily guarded.

[499] Benbecula, the section of the 'Long Island' situated between North and South Uist, is connected to these islands by sea fords that can only be crossed at low tide, making it easy to defend.

[500] I found that the custom of nick-naming local notabilities after distinguished statesmen still exists. When I was visiting these islands fifteen years ago I met a crofter known as ‘Gladstone’ on account of his financial ability and his persuasive powers of (Gaelic) oratory, and there were others whose nick-names I have forgotten.

[500] I found that the tradition of giving local figures nicknames based on famous politicians is still alive. When I visited these islands fifteen years ago, I met a farmer called ‘Gladstone’ because of his financial skills and his impressive (Gaelic) speaking abilities, and there were others whose nicknames I can’t remember.

[501] I obtained a very interesting confirmation of this story from an aged cailliach when in the islands. She told me that a family of Campbells, who lived near Loch Eynort or Loch Skipport, had rowed the Prince and Neil MacEachain to Benbecula, and that the Prince was furiously angry with them; but her explanation of his anger was that the boatmen were Campbells, a name not beloved in the Outer Hebrides: no one had ever thought of the terrifying effect of a tidal island on a stranger. Cf. R. L. Stevenson’s Kidnapped, ch. xiv.

[501] I got a really interesting confirmation of this story from an old woman when I was in the islands. She told me that a family of Campbells, who lived near Loch Eynort or Loch Skipport, had taken the Prince and Neil MacEachain to Benbecula, and that the Prince was really angry with them; but her explanation for his anger was that the boatmen were Campbells, a name not well-liked in the Outer Hebrides: no one had ever considered the frightening effect of a tidal island on a stranger. Cf. R. L. Stevenson’s Kidnapped, ch. xiv.

[502] A tenant who takes stock from the landlord and shares with him in the increase.

[502] A tenant who receives resources from the landlord and benefits from the growth.

[503] Clanranald’s residence in Benbecula.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Clanranald's home in Benbecula.

[504] A hill named Rueval, 400 feet above sea level, the only high ground on a very flat island. A projecting rock, on the south side of the hill, which gives considerable shelter and affords a wonderful view of the country, is probably the spot where the Prince lay waiting for Flora.

[504] A hill called Rueval, 400 feet above sea level, the only elevated area on a very flat island. A jutting rock on the south side of the hill provides good shelter and offers a fantastic view of the landscape; it's likely the place where the Prince waited for Flora.

[505] John Campbell of Mamore; b. about 1693; d. 1770; suc. as Duke of Argyll on the death of his cousin, the 3rd duke, in 1761. He had command of the troops in the west of Scotland in 1745, with headquarters at Dumbarton. He pursued Prince Charles through the islands, hunting for him as far away as St. Kilda. He was on his way back from that island when he nearly captured the Prince at Benbecula. Many of the Jacobite prisoners passed through his hands, and, as a rule, he was kind to them, contrasting favourably with such men as Scott and Ferguson.

[505] John Campbell of Mamore; born around 1693; died in 1770; became Duke of Argyll after his cousin, the 3rd duke, passed away in 1761. He led the troops in western Scotland in 1745, with headquarters in Dumbarton. He chased Prince Charles through the islands, searching for him all the way to St. Kilda. He was returning from that island when he nearly caught the Prince at Benbecula. Many of the Jacobite prisoners went through his custody, and he was generally kind to them, which stood in stark contrast to men like Scott and Ferguson.

[506] Spelt Loch Uskavagh in the Ordnance Survey.

[506] Spelled Loch Uskavagh in the Ordnance Survey.

[507] i.e. Neil MacEachain.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ i.e. Neil MacEachain.

[508] The home of Sir Alexander of Sleat at this time was Monkstat House (also spelt Mongstat, Mougstot and other variations), in the parish of Kilmuir, Trotternish. It was built on the site of an ancient monastic foundation near the shores of a lake named Columbkill, since then drained and parcelled into crofts. The ancient home of the family was Duntulm Castle, about five miles north of Monkstat, but during the troubles of the Revolution it is said to have been burnt by a party landed from a warship. Local legendary lore gives various other versions of the reason for abandoning Duntulm. By one account the family was driven from the castle by the ghost of Donald Gorm, a sixteenth-century ancestor. By another, it was owing to the death of a child of the family, who was killed by a fall from a window of the castle, which is built on the edge of a precipitous rock overhanging the sea. Monkstat was built in its stead.

[508] At this time, Sir Alexander of Sleat lived in Monkstat House (also spelled Mongstat, Mougstot, and other variations), located in the parish of Kilmuir, Trotternish. It was constructed on the site of an old monastery near the shores of a lake called Columbkill, which has since been drained and divided into small farms. The family's original home was Duntulm Castle, about five miles north of Monkstat, but during the turmoil of the Revolution, it was reportedly burned down by a group that landed from a warship. Local legends offer various explanations for why they left Duntulm. One story claims that the family fled the castle due to the ghost of Donald Gorm, a sixteenth-century ancestor. Another suggests it was because a child in the family died after falling from a window of the castle, which was perched on a steep cliff overhanging the sea. Monkstat was built in its place.

[509] Alexander Macdonald of Kingsburgh, a senior cadet of the Sleat family, was the 6th in descent from James, a younger son of Donald Gruamach, 6th in descent from John, Lord of the Isles and the Princess Margaret. Kingsburgh was Sir Alexander’s factor in 1746. His house was on Loch Snizort, about eight miles south of Monkstat.

[509] Alexander Macdonald of Kingsburgh, a senior cadet of the Sleat family, was the 6th generation descendant of James, a younger son of Donald Gruamach, who was 6 generations removed from John, Lord of the Isles, and Princess Margaret. Kingsburgh served as Sir Alexander’s estate manager in 1746. His house was located on Loch Snizort, roughly eight miles south of Monkstat.

[510] The garrison belonged to the Macleod Militia, and the officer in command was Alexander, son of Donald Macleod of Balmeanach.

[510] The garrison was part of the Macleod Militia, and the officer in charge was Alexander, son of Donald Macleod of Balmeanach.

[511] Robert Craigie of Glendoick, Perthshire; b. 1685; advocate 1710; Lord Advocate 1742-46; Lord President 1754; d. 1760.

[511] Robert Craigie of Glendoick, Perthshire; born 1685; advocate 1710; Lord Advocate 1742-46; Lord President 1754; died 1760.

[512] App. 1. Printed in Chiefs of Grant, ii. 144. From Edinburgh, telling of rumours of the Pretender’s eldest son who had sailed from France. Requesting intelligence for government and expressing his belief that Grant will do all in his power to support government.

[512] App. 1. Printed in Chiefs of Grant, ii. 144. From Edinburgh, sharing news about the Pretender’s eldest son who had left for France. Asking for information for the government and expressing confidence that Grant will do everything possible to support the government.

[513] App. 2. C. of G., ii. 146. Of Grant’s zeal for H. M. and the government he never doubted. First intelligence ridiculously exaggerated, and had delayed military advance, but now Cope will be soon in your neighbourhood which ‘with the assistance of H. M. friends it’s hoped will restore quiet to the country.’

[513] App. 2. C. of G., ii. 146. No one ever questioned Grant’s commitment to H. M. and the government. Initial reports were wildly exaggerated, causing a hold-up in military progress, but now Cope will soon be in your area, and with the help of H. M. supporters, it’s hoped that order will be restored in the country.

[514] Near Aberfeldy; Cope reached it when marching to the Highlands from Stirling on 23rd Aug. He reached Trinifuir the 24th; Dalnacardoch 25th; Dalwhinny 26th.

[514] Near Aberfeldy; Cope got there while marching to the Highlands from Stirling on August 23rd. He arrived at Trinifuir on the 24th; Dalnacardoch on the 25th; and Dalwhinny on the 26th.

[515] App. 3. Mr. Grant to Sir John Cope, dated 25th Aug.—Upon the first Information I had of the Pretender’s son landing in the north west Highlands I came to this part of the Country, and conveened all the Gentlemen of my name, and gave them Directions to prepare as well as they could to keep the Peace of the Country. I and my Friends have had great vengeance denounced against us by those Clans, who are in arms, for the appearance we made for the Government at the Revolution, and in the year 1715. We have been preparing to defend ourselves the best we could; But now all my Fears are dissipate, as I am informed you are marching to attack those Rebells, when I think of your abilitys and experience, no doubt can remain with me, but that the Highlanders will run before you. I wish you from my heart all Success. I have sent the Bearer a cousin of mine who has served several years in the army, to give you all the Information he can, and to assure you of my zeal for the Support of his Majestys Service and Government, I am with esteem, Sir, etc.

[515] App. 3. Mr. Grant to Sir John Cope, dated August 25th.—When I first heard about the Pretender’s son landing in the northwest Highlands, I came to this part of the country and gathered all the gentlemen of my name. I instructed them to prepare as best as they could to maintain peace in the area. My friends and I have faced severe threats from the clans in arms against us due to our support for the government during the Revolution and in 1715. We have been getting ready to defend ourselves as well as possible; however, now all my fears are gone because I’ve been informed that you are marching to confront those rebels. Considering your skills and experience, I have no doubt that the Highlanders will flee before you. I sincerely wish you all the success. I’ve sent my cousin, who has served in the army for several years, with this message to provide you with as much information as he can and to assure you of my commitment to supporting His Majesty’s Service and Government. I am, with respect, Sir, etc.

[516] This date is wrong; Cope reached Ruthven 27th August; Dalrachny’s (Carrbridge) 28th August; Inverness 29th August. (See Itinerary and authorities there quoted.)

[516] This date is incorrect; Cope arrived at Ruthven on August 27th; Dalrachny (Carrbridge) on August 28th; Inverness on August 29th. (See Itinerary and sources cited there.)

[517] All this is disingenuous and quite anachronic. The Duke of Perth, it is true, had fled from Drummond Castle on 24th July, and taken refuge in Braemar, but he had left long before this, for he was back at Machany in Perthshire on 9th August. (Jac. Lairds of Gask, pp. 103, 104.) Cluny Macpherson at this time had declared openly for government, had accepted a commission as captain in Lord Loudoun’s Highland regiment, and was now actually raising his men for King George. He was seized by Lochiel on 28th August, carried prisoner to Perth, and not released until the 9th or 10th September, when he undertook to join the Prince. He returned to Badenoch, and not until then raised his men for the Stuart Cause. The Mackintoshes at this time were arming for King George, under their chief, who was a captain in the Highland regiment (Black Watch); it was not until considerably later that they deserted their chief to join Prince Charles under Lady Mackintosh.

[517] This whole thing is insincere and really outdated. The Duke of Perth did escape from Drummond Castle on July 24th and sought safety in Braemar, but he had already left much earlier, as he was back at Machany in Perthshire on August 9th. (Jac. Lairds of Gask, pp. 103, 104.) At this point, Cluny Macpherson had openly declared his loyalty to the government, accepted a captaincy in Lord Loudoun’s Highland regiment, and was actively recruiting men for King George. He was captured by Lochiel on August 28th, taken to Perth as a prisoner, and wasn’t released until September 9th or 10th, when he agreed to join the Prince. He went back to Badenoch, and only then did he start gathering his men for the Stuart Cause. Meanwhile, the Mackintoshes were arming for King George under their chief, who was a captain in the Highland regiment (Black Watch); it wasn't until much later that they switched sides to join Prince Charles with Lady Mackintosh.

[518] Alexander Brodie of Brodie, Morayshire; M.P. Inverness Burghs; appointed Lyon-King-of-Arms 1727; d. 1754. His daughter married John, eldest son of Macleod of the ’45.

[518] Alexander Brodie of Brodie, Morayshire; M.P. Inverness Burghs; appointed Lyon-King-of-Arms in 1727; died in 1754. His daughter married John, the eldest son of Macleod of the ’45.

[519] App. 4. C. of G., ii. 149. A letter of indignant remonstrance. Cope cannot attack highlanders in their passes or strongholds without highlanders to flank the regular troops. If the king’s highland friends fail him we are undone, and all of us must be at the mercy of the rebels. The writer is told that Grant’s people refuse to join him (Grant) if he joins Cope or marches out of his own country. Let him beware of counsels that will lead to his ruin. Grant should not give himself the airs of having a clan that can support and serve the government if when it comes to the push they tell him they won’t go along with him. Grant had written to Cope expressing his readiness to join and assist him, but he would neither join him nor assist him with one man, nor go near him, although Cope stopped at Aviemore and spent the night at Dalrachny’s (Carrbridge) within ten miles of Grant. Rose of Kilravock, Lord Moray, General Cope and President Forbes are all disappointed with him. Grant’s uncle, the major (governor of Fort George, Inverness Castle) is very angry. It would have been far better if Grant had given no assurances if he were not sure he could fulfil them. The writer is distressed about what people are saying of Grant at Inverness. How glorious it would have been if he had been the first man in the country to join the king’s forces. The President has got two hundred stand of arms for the laird of Mackintosh, who is to join Cope with two hundred men. Munro, Mackays, Sutherland, Seaforth and others are raising their men for government. The writer is to meet Cope and President Forbes on Tuesday (3rd September), what is he to say of or for Grant at that interview?

[519] App. 4. C. of G., ii. 149. A letter of angry protest. Cope can’t attack the highlanders in their mountain passes or strongholds without having highlanders to support the regular troops. If the king’s highland allies let him down, we’re finished, and we’ll all be at the mercy of the rebels. I’ve heard that Grant’s people refuse to support him if he teams up with Cope or leaves his own territory. He should be cautious of advice that could lead to his downfall. Grant shouldn’t act like he has a clan that can back the government if, when it comes to the crunch, they tell him they won’t follow him. Grant had written to Cope showing his willingness to join him, but he won’t actually join or assist him with a single man, nor will he approach him, even though Cope stayed at Aviemore and spent the night at Dalrachny’s (Carrbridge), just ten miles away from Grant. Rose of Kilravock, Lord Moray, General Cope, and President Forbes are all disappointed in him. Grant’s uncle, the major (governor of Fort George, Inverness Castle) is very upset. It would have been much better if Grant hadn’t made any promises if he wasn’t sure he could keep them. I’m worried about what people are saying about Grant in Inverness. How amazing it would have been if he had been the first in the country to join the king’s forces. The President has secured two hundred arms for the laird of Mackintosh, who is going to join Cope with two hundred men. Munro, Mackays, Sutherland, Seaforth, and others are raising troops for the government. I’m supposed to meet Cope and President Forbes on Tuesday (3rd September), so what am I going to say about Grant at that meeting?

A separate piece of paper contains this rider, ‘I would not have been so strong if it had not been with a design, that you might show it to those of your own people that I am told are not for leaving your own countrey; so hope you’ll forgive any strong expressions, as my meaning is to serve you.’

A separate piece of paper has this note: ‘I wouldn’t have been so firm if it wasn’t intentional, so that you could show it to those in your community who I hear are not in favor of leaving your country; so I hope you’ll excuse any blunt remarks, as my intention is to help you.’

[520] Ludovick Grant’s uncle.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ludovick Grant's uncle.

[521] App. 5. C. of G., ii. 152. Duke of Gordon claims a right to the superiority over Morange, and Glenbucket (the Duke’s former commissioner) was threatening the people if they did not join him.

[521] App. 5. C. of G., ii. 152. The Duke of Gordon claims the right to be in charge of Morange, and Glenbucket (the Duke’s former representative) was threatening the locals if they didn’t support him.

[522] App. 6. C. of G., ii. 155. Grant’s situation had made it absolutely impossible to wait on Cope when in his neighbourhood; tells of Glenbucket’s movements; also that very few have joined the Pretender’s son north of Badenoch; Glenbucket only got 130 men from Strathdoune (Strathavon) and Glenlivet.

[522] App. 6. C. of G., ii. 155. Grant’s situation made it completely unfeasible to visit Cope when he was nearby; it mentions Glenbucket’s movements; also that very few people have joined the Pretender’s son north of Badenoch; Glenbucket only gathered 130 men from Strathdoune (Strathavon) and Glenlivet.

[523] James Ogilvy, eldest son of the 5th Earl of Findlater and 2nd Earl of Seafield; b. 1715; suc. as 6th Earl 1764; d. 1770. He was a brother-in-law of Lord George Murray, being married to his step-sister Lady Mary. He was also brother-in-law to Ludovick Grant, who married (1735) Deskford’s sister, Lady Margaret, a union which two generations later (1811) brought the Earldom of Seafield (but not of Findlater) to the Grant family.

[523] James Ogilvy, the eldest son of the 5th Earl of Findlater and the 2nd Earl of Seafield; born in 1715; became the 6th Earl in 1764; died in 1770. He was the brother-in-law of Lord George Murray, married to his step-sister Lady Mary. He was also brother-in-law to Ludovick Grant, who married Deskford’s sister, Lady Margaret, a marriage that, two generations later (1811), passed the Earldom of Seafield (but not Findlater) to the Grant family.

[524] App. 7. C. of G., ii. 160. Protests against the granting of one company only, but Lord Deskford has explained and he acquiesces; he names as officers for the independent company—Capt., Grant of Rothiemurchus; Lieut., Robert Grant, son of Easter Duthill; Ensign, William Grant, yr., of Dellachapple.

[524] App. 7. C. of G., ii. 160. There are objections to giving exclusive rights to one company, but Lord Deskford has clarified his stance and agrees; he proposes the following officers for the independent company—Captain Grant of Rothiemurchus; Lieutenant Robert Grant, son of Easter Duthill; Ensign William Grant, younger, of Dellachapple.

[525] App. 8. C. of G., ii. 160. (From Culloden.)

[525] App. 8. C. of G., ii. 160. (From Culloden.)

[526] App. 9. C. of G., ii. 162. (From Culloden.)

[526] App. 9. C. of G., ii. 162. (From Culloden.)

[527] The Macphersons under Cluny joined the Prince at Edinburgh (nine or ten marches distant) on 31st October. The Mackintoshes joined the reserves at Perth (five marches) on 30th October.

[527] The Macphersons with Cluny met up with the Prince in Edinburgh (about nine or ten marches away) on October 31st. The Mackintoshes arrived at the reserves in Perth (five marches) on October 30th.

[528] Accidentally shot at Falkirk the day after the battle.

[528] Accidentally shot at Falkirk the day after the battle.

[529] App. 10. Angus MacDonell, second son to Glengerry, to the Baillie of Urquhart, dated Delchannie, 30th Sept.—This serves to give you notice, that I am this far on my way to Glengerry, and being clad with the Princes orders to burn and harrass all People that does not immediately join the Standart and as I have particular orders to raise your Country, I do by these begg the Favour of you on receipt of this to have at least 100 men ready in 5 days after receipt of this to join my Standart at Invergarry, and tho contrary to my Inclinations, in case of not due Obedience to this my demand, I shall march to your Country with the Gentlemen here in Company, Keppoch’s Brother and Tirnadrish,[659] etc. and shall put my orders in Execution with all Rigour. And as I have the Greatest Regard for Grant and all his Concerns, I begg you’ll neither give your Country nor me any Trouble, I do not chuse to give, and your ready Compliance with this will much oblige him, who is sincerely, Dr. Sir, your most humble servant.

[529] App. 10. Angus MacDonell, second son to Glengerry, to the Baillie of Urquhart, dated Delchannie, 30th Sept.—This is to inform you that I am on my way to Glengerry, following the Prince's orders to burn and harass anyone who doesn't immediately join the Standard. Since I have specific instructions to rally your region, I kindly ask that you have at least 100 men ready within 5 days of receiving this message to join my Standard at Invergarry. Although it's not my preference, if I don't receive proper compliance with this request, I will march into your area with the gentlemen accompanying me, including Keppoch’s Brother and Tirnadrish, and I will carry out my orders with full severity. As I have a great respect for Grant and all his matters, I ask that you don't cause any trouble for your region or for me, as I have no desire to do so. Your prompt cooperation will be greatly appreciated, and I remain, dear sir, your most humble servant. [659]

P.S.—Let me have your answer p bearer, which will determine me how to behave.

P.S.—Please send me your reply via the messenger, which will help me decide how to act.

App. 11. Mr. Grant to the Gentlemen of Urquhart, dated Castle Grant, 6th Oct.—Auchmony has communicate to me the Subject you have had lately under your deliberation. All the Return I will give you, considering what I formerly wrote to my Chamberlain, and which he communicate to you is this, That whoever among you dont comply with my directions in this present conjuncture, which is to remain peaceable at home, and to be ready to receive my Directions as your Superior, and as Master of my own Estate, must resolve to obey me at your own Peril. And as I have firmly determined that whosoever shall insult me or disturb any part of my Estate shall meet with the Returns such an Insult shall merite. I am hopefull none of my neighbours will act a part by me, which I could not nor cannot allow myself to think them capable of. I cannot conceive the least title any man can have to command any of my vassals or Tenants, but myself, therefore whoever deserts me to follow any other at this Time, I must look upon it as a disobedience to me, which I will never forgive or forget to them and theirs. I am perfectly persuaded all the tenants will adhere and keep firm to me, if they are not led astray by bad advice, which I hope they will not follow.—I am, Gentlemen, your Friend and will continue so, if not your own Fault.

App. 11. Mr. Grant to the Gentlemen of Urquhart, dated Castle Grant, 6th Oct.—Auchmony has informed me about the topic you’ve recently been discussing. The only response I will give you, considering what I previously wrote to my Chamberlain and what he shared with you, is this: anyone among you who does not follow my instructions during this time, which are to remain peaceful at home and to be ready to receive my directives as your Superior and as the Master of my own Estate, must be prepared to face the consequences of disobeying me. I am firmly resolved that anyone who insults me or disrupts any part of my Estate will receive appropriate retribution for such an insult. I sincerely hope that none of my neighbors will behave in a way that I could not, nor can I, imagine them capable of. I cannot understand how any man has the right to command any of my vassals or tenants except myself; therefore, anyone who abandons me to follow someone else at this time will be seen as disobedient, which I will never forgive or forget. I am fully convinced that all the tenants will remain loyal to me, as long as they are not led astray by poor advice, which I hope they will avoid. I am, gentlemen, your friend and will continue to be, unless it is due to your own fault.

App. 12. The Baillie of Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated Bellmackaen, 8th Oct.—In obedience to your orders I convened all the Tenents of this Country this day, in order to March them to Strathspey, and there was only 60 or 70 of the Tenents, that agreed to go with me. Dell and I came with all the men that joined us the length of Drumbuie, so far on our way to Strathspey, and Coll MacDonald and all the Gentlemen of this Country came up with us there, and one and all of the Gentlemen but Sheuglie and his son swore publickly to the Tenents, if they did not return immediately or two nights thereafter, that all their Corns would be burnt and destroyed, and all their Cattle carried away. And when the Tenents were so much threatned by the Gentlemen as well as by Mr. MacDonald, they would not follow me one foot further. And upon the Tenents returning Mr. MacDonald assured me, that this Country would be quite safe from any hurt from him and not only so; but as some of the Gentlemen that came north with him, had the same orders as he had to destroy this Country, if we did not join them, he sincerely assured me, he would do all he could to prevent these Gentlemen from coming. And if he could not prevail upon them to keep back, that he would run me an Express in a few days to put me on my guard, and acquaint me of their coming; but one thing I assure you of e’er ten days that this Country will be ruined. Lord Lovat has not appointed a day for his marching as yet; for I am told that he has the Meal to make that he carrys along with him for his Men’s subsistance. There is a Report here this day that there is 2000 French landed at Cromarty last Saturday with Prince Charles Brother. You’ll please let me have your advice how to behave; for I am in a very bad situation. Please excuse this confused Letter, being in haste and ever am, Honourable sir, Your most faithfull hubl sert.

App. 12. The Baillie of Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated Bellmackaen, 8th Oct.—Following your orders, I gathered all the tenants in this area today to march them to Strathspey, but only 60 or 70 agreed to come with me. Dell and I brought all the men who joined us as far as Drumbuie on our way to Strathspey, where Coll MacDonald and all the gentlemen from this area joined us. Every gentleman except Sheuglie and his son publicly warned the tenants that if they didn’t return right away or within two nights, all their crops would be burned and their cattle taken away. With such threats from both the gentlemen and Mr. MacDonald, the tenants refused to follow me any further. When the tenants turned back, Mr. MacDonald assured me that this area would be completely safe from him and not only that; he sincerely promised to do everything he could to stop the gentlemen who came north with him from carrying out their orders to destroy this area if we didn’t join them. He also said that if he couldn’t persuade them to hold back, he would send me an express message in a few days to warn me and inform me of their approach. However, I can assure you that within ten days, this area will be ruined. Lord Lovat hasn’t set a date for his march yet, as I’ve been told he is preparing the meal he’s bringing for his men’s sustenance. There’s a report today that 2000 French arrived at Cromarty last Saturday with Prince Charles’ brother. Please let me know how I should act, as I am in a very difficult situation. I apologize for this rushed letter, as I am in a hurry, and remain, Honourable sir, your most faithful humble servant.

P. Auchmony[660] did not act a right part.

P. Auchmony[660] did not play the right role.

App. 13. Mr. Grant to the Chamberlain of Urquhart, dated Castle Grant, 10th Oct.—I received yours of the 8th this day about Dinner Time. I am not at all surprised at the Conduct of the Gentlemen of Urquhart; for as they seem determined to disobey my repeated Orders, they want to prevail with my Tenents to do so likeways. However now that they must have heard, that General Legonier with at least 18,000 of our troops that have come from Flanders and the Dutch, and that there is 12,000 Danes, and the Remainder of the British Troops dayly expected, and that nobody even at Edinburgh pretended to say, that the French can spare any of their troops, I fancy they will soon see their Folly, and they must be satisfied in a little Time, I will make them repent their Conduct, and they will see the numbers they believed would join the Rebells, dwindle to a very few, if any at all. Whenever you hear any Motions among your neighbours make the best of your way for this Place and see to bring these men with you, who were coming last day and as many more as you can, and assure them I will see what Losses they sustain repaid. And shall do all in my power afterwards to save them when others must fly the country. Dont let any of the Gentlemen know the day you design to march over with the men, other ways they might bring a Possy to stop you, which will not be in their Power if you be upon your Guard. I think you ought to have Spyes in the neighbouring Countries. See that you get money from the Tenents, who are due, that we may clear when you come over.

App. 13. Mr. Grant to the Chamberlain of Urquhart, dated Castle Grant, 10th Oct.—I got your message from the 8th today around dinner time. I'm not at all surprised by the actions of the gentlemen of Urquhart; they seem determined to ignore my repeated orders and want to convince my tenants to do the same. However, now that they must have heard that General Legonier has at least 18,000 of our troops coming from Flanders and the Dutch, along with 12,000 Danes and the rest of the British troops expected daily, and that no one, even in Edinburgh, is claiming that the French can spare any of their troops, I think they will soon realize their mistake. They will have to accept that I will make them regret their actions, and they will see the numbers of those they thought would join the rebels shrink to very few, if any at all. Whenever you hear any movements among your neighbors, make your way to this place and try to bring the men who were coming last time, along with as many more as you can, and assure them that I will compensate them for any losses they endure. I will do everything I can to protect them when others must flee the country. Don’t let any of the gentlemen know when you plan to march over with the men; otherwise, they might gather a posse to stop you, which they won’t be able to do if you are on guard. I think you should have spies in the neighboring areas. Make sure to collect money from the tenants who owe us, so we can settle everything when you come over.

[530] App. 14. C. of G., ii. 170. (From Inverness.) Claims Grant as a relation and friend whom he finds, with great satisfaction, acting so distinguished a part. The king has appointed Loudoun to command the troops in this country; it gives him the greatest pleasure to know that he has so powerful and faithful a friend to support him in time of need.

[530] App. 14. C. of G., ii. 170. (From Inverness.) Claims Grant as a relative and friend, expressing great satisfaction in seeing him take on such an important role. The king has appointed Loudoun to lead the troops in this area; it brings him immense joy to know he has such a strong and loyal friend backing him in times of need.

[531] App. 15. C. of G., ii. 171. (From Culloden.) Urging Grant to press forward his company; any expense after his men are brought together shall be made good. Believes that ‘the thing will blow over without much harm,’ but Grant should have his eye on as many of his people as he can arm, to be ready for any emergency; ‘ways and means shall be fallen on to subsist them.’

[531] App. 15. C. of G., ii. 171. (From Culloden.) Encouraging Grant to move his company forward; any costs incurred after his men are gathered will be covered. Believes that ‘the situation will resolve itself without much damage,’ but Grant should keep track of as many of his people as he can supply weapons to, in case of any emergencies; ‘solutions will be found to support them.’

[532] App. 16. C. of G., ii. 175. Mr. Grant’s heart is full of zeal for the preservation of our religion and liberties, and will exert himself to do everything in his power for H. M. service, and is perfectly happy ‘that we who are the friends of government’ have Loudoun to advise and direct us. The delay in his company’s joining Loudoun is caused by all his clan vassals being ready, and he wishes the company to be all volunteers. He foresees that there will be occasion to convene all his men and he wants Rothiemurchus with him, and asks for certain alterations in the commissions to his officers. All the men of his company will have swords and most of them pistols and dirks. Hopes to capture Capt. Gordon, who is levying cess on his party as their arms will be useful. He is determined to let none of the clans now in motion enter his county.

[532] App. 16. C. of G., ii. 175. Mr. Grant is passionately committed to protecting our faith and freedoms and will do everything he can for His Majesty’s service. He feels lucky that we, as supporters of the government, have Loudoun to guide us. The hold-up in his company joining Loudoun is because all his clan members are ready, and he wants the company to be made up entirely of volunteers. He anticipates needing to gather all his men together and wants Rothiemurchus by his side, plus he requests some changes to the commissions for his officers. Everyone in his company will be equipped with swords, and most will have pistols and dirks. He hopes to capture Capt. Gordon, who is collecting taxes from his group since their weapons would be useful. He is set on preventing any of the clans currently mobilizing from entering his county.

[533] App. 17. John Grant in Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated 21st Oct.—The MacDonalds and Glenmoristones came into this Country Saturdays night late, and Sundays morning. And this day we expected the Master of Lovat with 200 men to join the MacDonalds, who were in number six score, in order to spreath [ravage] the Country, if the whole people did not join them. The countrymen were all acquainted to meet this day at Milntown, but few of them attended. And as the Master did not come this day, as he appointed, sent word that he would be here tomorrow morning, so that I am made to understand, that they design to raise all their Cattle, and by that method are of opinion, that the men will come present, and condescend to march directly to the army before their Effects are carried off, but I made the Bearer, who is the only one I could trust in, advise the People to keep at a distance and allow them to carry off their cattle, as I assured them that you would repay them in what damage they might suffer that way. I cannot acquaint you at this Time of the Gentlemens Disposition, but tomorrow I shall send an Express, and give you a full account of our Fate. Belintombs house was attacked; but I procured a party from the Colonel to guard it this night. Is all on haste but that I remain as becometh, Honble Sir your most ob. humble servant.

[533] App. 17. John Grant in Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated 21st Oct.—The MacDonalds and Glenmoristones arrived in this area late Saturday night and Sunday morning. Today, we were expecting the Master of Lovat with 200 men to join the MacDonalds, who numbered around 120, to raid the countryside if the local people didn't support them. The locals had been informed to gather today at Milntown, but only a few showed up. Since the Master didn't come as planned, he sent word that he would arrive tomorrow morning. It seems they plan to round up all their livestock, thinking that if they do, the men will come quickly and agree to march directly to the army before their property is taken. However, I had the only trustworthy messenger advise the people to stay away and let them take their cattle, assuring them that you would compensate for any losses they might incur. I can’t let you know the gentlemen's mood at this time, but I’ll send a messenger tomorrow with a full update on our situation. Belintomb's house was attacked, but I arranged for a group from the Colonel to guard it tonight. Everything is urgent, but I remain as you would expect, Honble Sir, your most obedient humble servant.

I am informed they design to march by Inverlaidnan. Barrisdale came this day from the north to this country; but did not bring any men alongst with him.

I’ve been told they plan to march by Inverlaidnan. Barrisdale came today from the north to this area, but he didn’t bring any men with him.

App. 18. John Grant in Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated 22nd Oct.—The most of the Countrymen met this day at Bellymore where Barrisdale came with a Commission from his Colonel to them, assuring if they did not join him, that he was fully resolved to spreath the whole Country. They all unanimously replyed that in any Event, they would not disobey their masters orders and his positive commands to them to sit peaceable at home, and swore that while there was a drop of Blood in their Bodys, they would not allow the Macdonalds to carry off their Cattle. In a short Time thereafter the Master of Lovat accompanied with all the Stratherrick Gentlemen came to Milntown, and after a long Conference with Mr. MacDonald of Barrisdale, he agreed that the MacDonalds in the Country might be compelled to join the Colonel, as he was not in readiness to march his men this week, but in the Event that this did not satisfy Mr. MacDonald, he was to come in person with 200 men tomorrow, to prevent their carrying off the Cattle, and secure the rest of the men for his own use, as he believed he had a better Title to them than any MacDonald in life. As they could not agree upon the above terms, Barrisdale went with the Master to Castle Downie to know my Lord’s sentiments, and act accordingly. As this happens to be the case we are as yet uncertain of our Fate, but shall to the outmost of our Power, resist the MacDonalds if not assisted by the Frasers Is all but that I remain as becometh, Honourable Sir, Your most obedt humble servt.

App. 18. John Grant in Urquhart to Mr. Grant, dated 22nd Oct.—Most of the local folks gathered today at Bellymore, where Barrisdale arrived with a message from his Colonel, stating that if they didn’t join him, he was fully determined to devastate the whole area. They all unanimously responded that no matter what, they would not disobey their master's orders and his clear commands for them to stay peacefully at home, and they swore that as long as they had a drop of blood in their bodies, they wouldn't let the Macdonalds take their cattle. Shortly afterward, the Master of Lovat, along with all the Stratherrick gentlemen, came to Milntown, and after a long discussion with Mr. MacDonald of Barrisdale, he agreed that the MacDonalds in the area could be compelled to join the Colonel, as he wasn’t ready to march his men this week. However, if that didn’t satisfy Mr. MacDonald, he would come in person with 200 men tomorrow to stop them from taking the cattle and secure the rest of the men for his own use, as he believed he had a better claim to them than any MacDonald alive. Since they couldn't agree on the terms, Barrisdale went with the Master to Castle Downie to get my Lord’s opinion and act accordingly. Since this is the situation, we are still uncertain about our fate, but we will do everything in our power to resist the MacDonalds if we’re not supported by the Frasers. This is all, but I remain, as it is proper, Honourable Sir, Your most obedt humble servt.

[534] App. 19. C. of G., ii. 179. (From Culloden.) A letter to Lord Deskford from the Lord President countersigned by Lord Loudoun. In addition to what Grant quotes, they cannot understand the unaccountable folly of his people that they deliberate in entering the company and hope that they may be persuaded to form it forthwith.

[534] App. 19. C. of G., ii. 179. (From Culloden.) A letter to Lord Deskford from the Lord President countersigned by Lord Loudoun. Besides what Grant mentions, they can't comprehend the baffling foolishness of his people, who are debating whether to join the group and hoping they can be convinced to do so immediately.

[535] App. 20. Lord Lewis Gordon to Mr. Grant, dated St. Bridget,[661] 3rd Nov.—I take this opportunity to assure you of the Esteem and Regard I have for yourself and all your Family, and that I shall be always glad to do all in my Power to maintain the good Correspondence that has so long subsisted between the Familys of Grant and Gordon. And as you are very sensible of the Situation of Scotland at present, I shall take this occasion of delivering you the Prince Regents Complements, and how much he would be obliged to you for your aid at this important Time; and if you dont appear active yourself, that you would not oppose the rising of your Clan, which is so capable of Serving the King and Country. I hope you will be so good, as to consider this seriously, and to excuse this Liberty from a Friend, who does it with a pure Intention of Serving his Country. I begg my Complements to Lady Margaret and all your Family, as also to Lord and Lady Findlater and Lord Deskfoord, to whom please tell, that what I am to do for the Princes Cause in Banffshire, shall be executed in the mildest and easiest manner in my Power. Glenbucket will deliver this to you, and believe me to be, Dr. Sir, with great Sincerity Your most affectionate ffriend and Servant.

[535] Approx. 20. Lord Lewis Gordon to Mr. Grant, dated St. Bridget, [661] 3rd Nov.—I want to take this chance to express my respect and affection for you and your entire family. I will always be happy to do whatever I can to keep the good relationship that has existed between the Grant and Gordon families for so long. Given the current situation in Scotland, I want to communicate the Prince Regent’s compliments and how grateful he would be for your support during this crucial time. Even if you can’t be active yourself, I hope you won’t stand in the way of your Clan rising up, as they are very capable of serving the King and the country. I hope you'll consider this seriously and forgive me for this request, coming from a friend who is purely motivated by a desire to serve his country. Please send my regards to Lady Margaret and your whole family, as well as to Lord and Lady Findlater and Lord Deskfoord. Let them know that whatever I can do for the Prince's cause in Banffshire will be done in the easiest and gentlest way possible. Glenbucket will deliver this to you, and believe me to be, dear Sir, with great sincerity, your most affectionate friend and servant.

[536] This was the ancestral home of the family of John Roy Stewart, the Jacobite soldier-poet.

[536] This was the family home of John Roy Stewart, the Jacobite soldier-poet.

[537] App. 21. C. of G., ii. 184. (From Inverness.) Grant’s company had arrived the previous day, was a very good one, the best clothed Loudoun had seen. Was sorry that Lord Lewis Gordon had risen, but the Duke (of Gordon) had given orders to his people not to join him. Few had done so. If Grant were attacked his own power should make Lord Lewis repent; if not strong enough Loudoun would do what he could for him.

[537] App. 21. C. of G., ii. 184. (From Inverness.) Grant’s company had arrived the day before and was really good, the best-dressed group Loudoun had seen. He was disappointed that Lord Lewis Gordon had moved, but the Duke (of Gordon) had instructed his people not to support him. Few had joined him. If Grant was attacked, his own strength should make Lord Lewis regret it; if he wasn’t strong enough, Loudoun would do what he could to help him.

[538] App. 22. C. of G., ii. 183. (From Culloden.)

[538] App. 22. C. of G., ii. 183. (From Culloden.)

[539] App. 23. C. of G., ii. 186. (From Castle Grant.)

[539] App. 23. C. of G., ii. 186. (From Castle Grant.)

[540] App. 24. C. of G., ii. 187. (From Inverness.) Lord Loudoun declines to send the company back to Mr. Grant, as he proposes to march through Stratherrick to Fort Augustus.

[540] App. 24. C. of G., ii. 187. (From Inverness.) Lord Loudoun refuses to send the company back to Mr. Grant because he plans to march through Stratherrick to Fort Augustus.

[541] Thomas Grant of Achoynanie, Keith, afterwards of Arndilly, a cadet of Grant of Grant, best known as the early patron of James Ferguson the astronomer. (Henderson, Life of Ferguson, p. 18.)

[541] Thomas Grant of Achoynanie, Keith, later of Arndilly, a branch of the Grant family, is best known as one of the early supporters of James Ferguson, the astronomer. (Henderson, Life of Ferguson, p. 18.)

[542] Alexander Grant of Tochineal, near Cullen.

[542] Alexander Grant of Tochineal, near Cullen.

[543] App. 25. Lord Lewis Gordon to Thomas Grant of Auchynany, dated Huntly Castle, 6th Dec.—As Lord Lieutenant of the Countys of Aberdeen and Banff, I am to raise a man for each £100 of valued Rent within the same, and where Fractions happen the same is to yield a Man. I hope, therefore, you will be so good as to send to Keith Tuesday next such a number of ablebodied men, as will answer to the Valuation of your estate well cloathed in short cloaths, Plaid, new Shoes, and three pair of hose and accoutred with shoulder belt, gun, pistol and sword. I have appointed a proper officer to attend at Keith the above day for receiving the men. I need not tell a man of your good sense and knowledge the hazard of not complying with the demand. Your Prudence will no doubt direct you to avoid hardships of military execution, wherein you’ll extremely oblige, Sir, your most humble servant.

[543] Approx. 25. Lord Lewis Gordon to Thomas Grant of Auchynany, dated Huntly Castle, 6th Dec.—As the Lord Lieutenant of Aberdeen and Banff, I need to raise one man for every £100 of assessed rent in these counties, and any fractional amounts will also count for one man. Therefore, I hope you will kindly send to Keith next Tuesday a number of able-bodied men that corresponds to the valuation of your estate, properly dressed in short clothes, plaid, new shoes, and three pairs of socks, and equipped with a shoulder belt, gun, pistol, and sword. I have arranged for an officer to be at Keith on that day to receive the men. I don’t need to explain to someone of your wisdom the risks of not meeting this demand. I trust your good judgment will guide you to avoid the difficulties of military enforcement, which would greatly oblige, Sir, your most humble servant.

App. 26. C. of G., ii. 190. Thomas Grant of Auchynanie to Mr. Grant, 11th Dec. (From Arndillie.) Lord Lewis Gordon has only 300 men, and of these only 100 have joined: mostly herds and hire-men from about Strathbogie and unacquainted with the use of arms; many of them are pressed and intend to desert; 100 or 150 of Grant’s men would drive them to the devil, and capture Lord Lewis and his prime minister Abbachy (Gordon of Avochie). Lord Findlater’s tenants and the people of Keith are being ruined by Abbachy and look to Grant as their only saviour. If Lord Loudoun would take possession of old Balveny Castle it would spoil Lord Lewis’s recruiting.

App. 26. C. of G., ii. 190. Thomas Grant of Auchynanie to Mr. Grant, 11th Dec. (From Arndillie.) Lord Lewis Gordon has just 300 men, and of those, only 100 have joined: mostly herders and hired workers from around Strathbogie who don’t know how to fight; many of them are being forced to join and plan to desert. About 100 or 150 of Grant’s men could drive them away and capture Lord Lewis and his right-hand man, Abbachy (Gordon of Avochie). Lord Findlater’s tenants and the people of Keith are being destroyed by Abbachy and see Grant as their only hope. If Lord Loudoun would take over old Balveny Castle, it would ruin Lord Lewis’s recruitment efforts.

App. 27. Lord Findlater’s Steward[542] to his Lordship, dated 11th Dec.—I had a Letter from John Saunders in Keith upon Sabbath day night, informing me that there had 60 of Lord Lewis men come to that place upon Saturdays night, under command of one White and that he and others in that place much wanted advice what to do. To whom I wrote for Answer, that I had a letter from Lord Lewis Gordon for your Lordship, which I forwarded by Express, was very peremptor, Lord Lewis had given no orders for making the least demand upon your Lordships Estate before its Return, so I expected that none concerned in him, would offer to do it before that Time, yet notwithstanding thereof, I had the inclosed this day from William Taylor, to which I answered that as I sent Lord Lewis Letter to your Lordship per Express, I could neither give answer nor advice to his Letter, but that I expected that none concerned in Lord Lewis would have made any demand of your Lop. Estate before I had your Answer. As likeways that they would have defered compounding the matter untill that Time. David Tulloch[662] is just now at Banff with about 60 or 80 men and as I am told demands no fewer Levies from that Town as 200 men. Birkenbush was here last night, and told me that as it is not in his power to get your Lordships Estate saved in such a way as he would have desired has utterly refused having any Concern in uplifting the Levies from that Bounds, for which I have been very angry at him; but it cannot now help. To appearance Mr. Tulloch or Abbachy will be soon here, and unless your Lordship fall upon some shift for relief to us, we shall suffer extremely.

App. 27. Lord Findlater’s Steward[542] to his Lordship, dated 11th Dec.—I received a letter from John Saunders in Keith on Sunday night, informing me that 60 of Lord Lewis's men had arrived there on Saturday night, led by someone named White. He and others in that area were seeking advice on what to do next. I responded to them that I had forwarded a letter from Lord Lewis Gordon to your Lordship by Express, which was very clear: Lord Lewis had given no orders to make any demands on your Lordship's Estate before it returned. Therefore, I expected that no one associated with him would attempt to do so before that time. Despite this, I received the enclosed letter today from William Taylor, to which I replied that since I had sent Lord Lewis's letter to your Lordship by Express, I could neither provide an answer nor advice regarding his letter. I expected that none involved with Lord Lewis would make any demands on your Lordship's Estate until I had your response. Additionally, I pointed out that they should have postponed any negotiations until then. David Tulloch[662] is currently in Banff with about 60 or 80 men and is reportedly demanding as many as 200 levies from that town. Birkenbush was here last night and told me that since he cannot save your Lordship's Estate in the way he would like, he has completely refused to be involved in collecting the levies from that area, which has made me quite angry with him, but it can't be helped now. It seems Mr. Tulloch or Abbachy will be here soon, and unless your Lordship finds some way to assist us, we will suffer greatly.

[544] App. 28. C. of G., ii. 192. (From Castle Grant.)

[544] App. 28. C. of G., ii. 192. (From Castle Grant.)

[545] App. 29. Earl of Findlater to Mr. Grant, dated 13th Dec.—After despatching the short letter I wrote you this morning, which is inclosed, I received the Inclosed from the President. All that I shall say is, that all their Proceedings will not secure our Safety unless a Sufficient right and Trusty Party is left in Banffshire for Lord Lewis’s small partys will stir as soon as they are past, if there is not force enough to suppress them. You know the State of my health makes it impossible for me to attend Lord Loudoun and make things agreeable to him as I would wish. I have writ to Tochineil[663] and John and William Ogilvies Sheriffs deputes to do their duty the best they can in all respects; but I am not without my own Fears that Fear and trembling for after Consequences may make some if not all of them extremely unwilling to act. Perhaps even they may decline it. You know you have full Power in everything that concerns me, to do what you think proper and I have full confidence you will do whatever you think right; but least some thing more formal should be requisite, with regard to the office of Sheriff I hereby give you full Power to act as Sheriff Depute of Banffshire and to employ such substitutes under you as you shall think fitt, for which this shall be to you and them a sufficient warrant and Commission, I always am most affectionately and entirely yours.

[545] App. 29. Earl of Findlater to Mr. Grant, dated December 13.—After sending you the brief letter I wrote this morning, which is included, I received the enclosed from the President. All I can say is that their actions won't guarantee our safety unless there's a reliable and trustworthy group left in Banffshire, because Lord Lewis’s small parties will move as soon as they get past if there isn’t enough force to stop them. You know my health prevents me from meeting with Lord Loudoun and making things as pleasant as I would like. I've written to Tochineil[663] and John and William Ogilvie, the deputy sheriffs, to do their jobs as best they can; however, I have my own concerns that fear and anxiety about the consequences might make some, if not all, of them very reluctant to act. They might even refuse to do so. You know you have full authority over anything concerning me to do what you think is right, and I trust you will act as you see fit; however, if something more formal is needed regarding the sheriff's office, I hereby give you full power to act as Sheriff Depute of Banffshire and to appoint any substitutes you deem appropriate, for which this will serve as sufficient authorization and commission to you and them. I remain, as always, completely and affectionately yours.

P.—My son intends to go down by Forress to wait of Lord Loudoun tomorrow; but as he continues extremely ill off the Cold I am uncertain if he will be really able to go. I begg you will send the Inclosed to Tochineil by some sturdy clever Man because the bearer is feckless and too well known, and may be searched for Letters. It contains orders for Tochineil, John and William Ogilvies to attend my Lord Loudoun. Keep the Presidents letter. Your wife opened the inclosed from Robert Grant.

P.—My son plans to head down to Forress to wait for Lord Loudoun tomorrow, but since he’s still really sick from the cold, I’m not sure if he’ll actually be able to go. Please send the enclosed letter to Tochneil with a strong, capable person, because the current messenger is weak and too well known, which means he might get searched for letters. It contains instructions for Tochneil, John, and William Ogilvies to meet with Lord Loudoun. Keep the President's letter. Your wife opened the enclosed letter from Robert Grant.

[546] App. 30. C. of G., ii. 189. (From Culloden.) This letter contains a postscript saying that Lord Loudoun ‘had prevailed with Lord Lovat to come in with him to town [Inverness] to reside at liberty there till the present confusions are over, to deliver up what arms he has, and to sign all proper orders to his clan to remain quiet. Loudoun brings him on with him to-day 11th [Dec.] 9 a clock in the morning.’

[546] Approx. 30. C. of G., ii. 189. (From Culloden.) This letter includes a postscript stating that Lord Loudoun ‘had convinced Lord Lovat to come to town [Inverness] to live freely there until the current chaos is resolved, to hand over any weapons he has, and to sign all necessary orders for his clan to stay calm. Loudoun is bringing him along today, December 11th, at 9 o'clock in the morning.’

[547] Boat o’ Bridge, the ferry on the Spey near the mouth of the Mulben burn, now superseded by a road and a railway bridge.

[547] Boat o' Bridge, the ferry on the Spey near the mouth of the Mulben burn, is now replaced by a road and a railway bridge.

[548] Sir Harry Innes of Innes (Morayshire), 5th bart. Suc. 1721; d. 1762. He was a brother-in-law of Ludovick Grant, married to his sister Anne. Innes’s son James suc. as Duke of Roxburghe on the death of the 4th duke in 1805.

[548] Sir Harry Innes of Innes (Morayshire), 5th baronet. Succeeded in 1721; died in 1762. He was the brother-in-law of Ludovick Grant, married to his sister Anne. Innes’s son James succeeded as Duke of Roxburghe after the death of the 4th duke in 1805.

[549] App. 31. C. of G., ii. 193. (From Elgin.) Macleod will most cheerfully act in conjunction with Grant in everything thought proper.

[549] App. 31. C. of G., ii. 193. (From Elgin.) Macleod will gladly work with Grant on anything deemed appropriate.

[550] Bog, the local name for the site of Gordon Castle, built on the Bog o’ Gight (windy bog). The ferry there was known as the Boat o’ Bog; it is now superseded by Fochabers Bridge.

[550] Bog, the local name for the site of Gordon Castle, built on the Bog o’ Gight (windy bog). The ferry there was known as the Boat o’ Bog; it is now replaced by Fochabers Bridge.

[551] App. 32. Mr. Grant to M‘Leod, dated 15th Dec.—I have just now the Pleasure of yours by our Friend Sir Harry Innes. I shall as soon as I get my Men conveened march to Fochabers and endeavour to get Possession of the Boats, and shall do all in my Power to secure the passage for the Men under your Command. I am hopefull the Rebells wont be able to give much disturbance.

[551] App. 32. Mr. Grant to M‘Leod, dated December 15th.—I just received your letter through our friend Sir Harry Innes. I will gather my men as soon as possible and march to Fochabers to try and take control of the boats. I will do everything I can to ensure safe passage for the men under your command. I'm hopeful the rebels won’t cause much trouble.

[552] App. 33. Lord Lewis Gordon to Mr. Grant, dated Fyvie, 16th Dec.—I was a little surprised this morning to hear that you had marched a body of your Men to the low Country so far as Mulben. Your Reason for such Proceedings I cant find out, as you have not got the least disturbance from the Prince, or any of his Friends, since his Royal Highness arrival in Scotland. And for my part I have not given you the least disturbance, since my coming to the North. So far from it, that I have given positive orders to the Gentlemen employed by me to raise the Levies, not to meddle with any of your Estate no not so much as to raise a man from a little Place called Delnaboe, which holds of the Duke of Gordon, to the men of which last place, I had a natural Title. I now desire to know, if you are to take any Concern in protecting the Estates of any but your own. If that is the case, I must take my Measures accordingly, and as the Consequence must be fatal you have none to blame but yourself. I am this minute writing to Lord John Drummond that he may march his Troops directly to this Country to join the men I have already raised; but if you withdraw your men, and give no further disturbance, it may move me to alter my Resolutions with respect to you. I wrote you a Letter from Strathdoune but was not favoured with any Return, but must insist on an answer to this in writing or by some Gentleman of Character. Offer my Complements to Lady Margaret and your young Family.—I am with much Respect, etc.

[552] App. 33. Lord Lewis Gordon to Mr. Grant, dated Fyvie, 16th Dec.—I was a bit surprised this morning to hear that you had moved a group of your men to the low country as far as Mulben. I can't figure out your reason for this action, as you haven't faced any trouble from the Prince or any of his supporters since his Royal Highness arrived in Scotland. And for my part, I haven’t caused you any disturbance since coming to the North. In fact, I’ve given clear instructions to the gentlemen working for me to raise the levies not to interfere with any of your property, not even to recruit a man from a small place called Delnaboe, which is under the Duke of Gordon, from whom I had a natural claim. I now want to know if you plan to involve yourself in protecting estates that aren’t your own. If that's the case, I’ll have to adjust my plans accordingly, and if the outcome is disastrous, you’ll have no one to blame but yourself. I'm currently writing to Lord John Drummond so he can march his troops directly to this area to join the men I've already raised; but if you pull back your men and cause no more trouble, I might reconsider my position regarding you. I wrote you a letter from Strathdoune but didn’t receive any response, and I must insist on a written reply or a response from a respectable gentleman. Please give my regards to Lady Margaret and your young family.—I am with much respect, etc.

Copy Printed Declaration of Lord John Drummond, Commander-in-Chief of his Most Christian Majesty’s Forces in Scotland.—We, Lord John Drummond, Commander-in-Chief of his most Christian Majesty’s Forces in Scotland, do hereby declare, that we are come to this kingdom with written orders to make war against the King of England, Elector of Hannover, and all his adherents, and that the positive orders we have from his most Christian Majesty are to attack all his ennemys in this Kingdom, whom he has declared to be those, who will not immediately join or assist as far as will ly in their power, the Prince of Wales, Regent of Scotland his Ally, and whom he is resolved with the concurrence of the King of Spain to support in the taking possession of Scotland, England and Ireland, if necessary at the expence of all the men and money he is master of, to which three Kingdoms the Family of Stewart have so just and indisputable a title. And his most Christian Majesty’s positive orders are, that his ennemys should be used in this Kingdom in proportion to the harm they do, or intend to his Royal Highness’s cause. Given at Montrose, the 2nd day of December 1745 years.

Copy Printed Declaration of Lord John Drummond, Commander-in-Chief of his Most Christian Majesty’s Forces in Scotland.—We, Lord John Drummond, Commander-in-Chief of his Most Christian Majesty’s Forces in Scotland, hereby declare that we have come to this kingdom with written orders to wage war against the King of England, Elector of Hannover, and all his supporters. Our direct orders from His Most Christian Majesty are to attack all his enemies in this kingdom, specifically those who refuse to immediately join or assist, to the best of their ability, the Prince of Wales, Regent of Scotland, his ally. He is determined, with the support of the King of Spain, to help the Prince take control of Scotland, England, and Ireland, if necessary, at the cost of all the resources at his disposal, as the Stewart family has a rightful and undeniable claim to these three kingdoms. His Most Christian Majesty’s strict orders state that his enemies should be dealt with in this kingdom based on the harm they cause or plan to cause to his Royal Highness’s cause. Given at Montrose, the 2nd day of December 1745.

J. Drummond.

J. Drummond.

Copy Printed Letter from Earl Marshall to Lord John Drummond, dated Paris, 1st Nov.My Lord,—As I am now obliged to attend the Duke of York to England, with a body of French Troops, I desire that you will be so good as to see if possible, or send word to the people that depend on me or have any regard for me in Aberdeenshire, or the Mearns, that are not with the Prince, that I expect they will immediately rise in arms, and make the best figure they can in this affair, which cannot now fail to succeed, and that they will take from you, my Cousin German directions, as to the manner they are to behave on this occasion.

Copy Printed Letter from Earl Marshall to Lord John Drummond, dated Paris, 1st Nov.My Lord,—Since I have to accompany the Duke of York to England with a group of French troops, I kindly ask you to check if it’s possible, or to inform those who depend on me or care about me in Aberdeenshire or the Mearns, who are not with the Prince, that I expect them to rise up in arms immediately and do their best in this situation, which is sure to succeed now, and that they should take directions from you, my cousin, on how to proceed in this matter.

I am sorry that just now it is not in my power to head them myself; but as soon as this affair will be over, I intend to go down to my native country and they may depend of my being always ready to do them what service will ly in my power.

I’m sorry that right now I can’t lead them myself; but as soon as this situation is resolved, I plan to go back to my home country, and they can count on me always being ready to help them however I can.

Marshal.[664]

Marshal.[664]

Directed to Lord John Drummond, Brigadier of the King’s Army and Colonel of the Royal Scots at Dunkirk.

Directed to Lord John Drummond, Brigadier of the King’s Army and Colonel of the Royal Scots at Dunkirk.

Copy Printed Letter from Lord John Drummond to William Moir of Loanmay, Esquire, Aberdeen 11th Dec.Sir,—You will be pleased to communicate the contents of this letter to such gentlemen of your country as are well affected to the Prince Regent, and who retain regard for the Earl Marshall, and assure them that what may be necessary for effectuating the ends proposed shall be heartily supplied by me, and I am, Sir, your most humble servant,

Copy Printed Letter from Lord John Drummond to William Moir of Loanmay, Esquire, Aberdeen 11th Dec.Mr.,—Please share the contents of this letter with the gentlemen in your area who support the Prince Regent and have respect for the Earl Marshall. Let them know that I am fully committed to providing whatever is needed to achieve the proposed goals. I remain, Sir, your most humble servant,

J. Drummond.

J. Drummond.

Addressed to Willm. Moir of Loanmay, Esq., Deputy Governor of Aberdeen.

Addressed to Willm. Moir of Loanmay, Esq., Deputy Governor of Aberdeen.

[553] App. 34. C. of G., ii. 199. (From Cullen.) Grant’s letter gives him vast joy; Culcairn will be with Grant to-morrow, while Macleod will go to Banff and thence to Turriff and Old Meldrum.

[553] App. 34. C. of G., ii. 199. (From Cullen.) Grant's letter brings him great happiness; Culcairn will be with Grant tomorrow, while Macleod will head to Banff and then to Turriff and Old Meldrum.

Culcairn to Mr. Grant, dated 17th Dec.—I came here this day with Captain William Macintoshes Company and mine, and have written to the Laird of M‘Leod telling my coming here and Resolution of going tomorrow to Cullen etc. and therefore pray acquaint me how affaires are with you. I wrote also to the Laird of M‘Leod to acquaint me how affaires are with him.—I am, Dr Sir, yours etc.

Culcairn to Mr. Grant, dated December 17th.—I arrived here today with Captain William Macintoshes' Company and mine, and I have written to the Laird of M‘Leod informing him of my arrival and my plan to go to Cullen tomorrow, etc. Please let me know how things are going with you. I also wrote to the Laird of M‘Leod to update me on how things are with him.—I am, Dr. Sir, yours, etc.

The following note was inclosed—

The following note was included—

All the Information that is known here about the Rebells, who fled Out of Fochabers, is that they all marched to Huntly, and about 6 men as computed abode in Newmilns Sunday night and on Monday followed to Huntly. There is no word yet from Lord Loudon.

All the information we have about the rebels who escaped from Fochabers is that they all marched to Huntly, and about 6 men are estimated to have stayed in Newmilns on Sunday night before proceeding to Huntly on Monday. There's no news from Lord Loudon yet.

[554] App. 35. Declaration published at Strathbogie by Mr. Grant, dated 18th Dec.—Whereas many of his Majesty Subjects have been compelled by Force and Threats to enlist in the Service of the Pretender, whilst there was no Force sufficient to protect them. If any such shall resort to me, and deliver up their arms, I shall signify their dutiful Behaviour in this point, to the end that it may be a motive to obtain their pardon from his Majestys Grace and will endeavour to free all of illegal and treasonable Levies of men and money; but such as presumes to persist in their treasonable Practices and to resist will be treated as Traitors.

[554] App. 35. Declaration published at Strathbogie by Mr. Grant, dated December 18.—Whereas many subjects of His Majesty have been forced by threats and violence to join the service of the Pretender, while there was no sufficient protection for them. If any of these individuals come to me and surrender their weapons, I will acknowledge their obedient actions in this matter to encourage a pardon from His Majesty's Grace and will work to dissolve all illegal and traitorous forces of men and money; however, those who choose to continue their treasonous actions and resist will be treated as traitors.

[555] App. 36. C. of G., ii. 194. (From Inverness.) Loudoun’s letter after applauding Grant’s zeal is very much the same as Lord Deskford’s letter which follows.

[555] App. 36. C. of G., ii. 194. (From Inverness.) Loudoun’s letter, after praising Grant’s enthusiasm, is very similar to Lord Deskford’s letter that follows.

[556] App. 37. Lord Deskfoord to Mr. Grant, dated 14th Dec.—I am now with Lord Loudon and in a conversation with him, I find that he is Sorry he has not Sufficient authority as yet from the Government either to give Pay to any Clan, except when an immediate necessity which cannot be answered by the Troops upon the establishment requires it, nor has he any arms to dispose of to the Friends of the Government, scarcely having sufficient arms here for the independent companies and his own Regiment. This being the Case and the Service in the Countrys of Banff and Aberdeenshire being sufficiently provided for by the 700 men already sent to that Country, it is impossible for him to take your men into Pay, and as your arms are certainly not extremely good, and he cannot give you others, I believe he would be as well pleased, that your People should go back to Strathspey; but he does not care to take it upon him to order them back, as the thing was undertaken without his Commands. If you carry your People home, he wishes you gave M‘Leod Information of it because he must regulate his motions accordingly with the independent Companys. He says he wont fail to represent your Zeal and that of your People, and wishes for the future nothing may be undertaken but in concert with those who have the Direction of the Kings affaires in this Country. Pray let us hear what you do. Loudon who is much your Friend assures me of another Thing which is that the first opportunity that offers of employing any People in a way to make them make a figure he will most certainly throw it into your hands. I hear there are more Troops to march eastward tomorrow. When Lord Loudon sets out himself is not certain.—I am, Dear Sir, etc.

[556] App. 37. Lord Deskfoord to Mr. Grant, dated 14th Dec.—I am currently with Lord Loudon, and in our conversation, I find that he is disappointed he does not yet have enough authority from the Government to pay any Clan, except in cases of immediate necessity that cannot be met by the Troops already in place. He also does not have any arms to distribute to the Government's supporters, as he barely has enough arms here for the independent companies and his own Regiment. Given this situation, and since the areas of Banff and Aberdeenshire are sufficiently covered by the 700 men already dispatched there, it is impossible for him to put your men on pay. Since your arms are certainly not the best, and he cannot provide you with others, I believe he would prefer that your people return to Strathspey. However, he doesn't want to take the responsibility of ordering them back since this was initiated without his approval. If you decide to bring your people home, he hopes you will inform M‘Leod about it, as he must adjust his plans according to the independent companies. He assures me that he will highlight your enthusiasm and that of your people and hopes in the future nothing will be undertaken without coordination with those in charge of the King's affairs in this country. Please let us know what you decide. Loudon, who is a good friend to you, assures me of one more thing: that as soon as there is an opportunity to employ any people in a way that would make a positive impression, he will definitely pass it on to you. I hear there are more Troops scheduled to march east tomorrow. It is uncertain when Lord Loudon will set out himself.—I am, Dear Sir, etc.

As the Governor commands here in Lord Loudons absence My Lord says he will chuse to leave the Grants here with him, that he may have one Company that he may entirely depend upon.

As the Governor directs in Lord Loudon's absence, my Lord says he prefers to leave the Grants here with him so that he has a company he can fully rely on.

[557] App. 38. C. of G., ii. 201. (From Huntly.) Grant writes he has a letter from Loudoun intimating he should not have marched further than Keith, and he will return there next day. Culcairn and Mackintosh want to join Macleod at Inverurie to-morrow night.

[557] App. 38. C. of G., ii. 201. (From Huntly.) Grant says he received a letter from Loudoun stating he shouldn't have advanced beyond Keith, and he'll head back there tomorrow. Culcairn and Mackintosh plan to team up with Macleod at Inverurie tomorrow night.

An enclosure contains the following lines, which naturally were not sent up to Government, and are not in the Record Office. They are taken from The Chiefs of Grant:—

An enclosure includes the following lines, which obviously weren't sent to the Government and aren't in the Record Office. They're taken from The Chiefs of Grant:—

‘Lord Loudoun will not act as Cope,
Whose ribbon now is call’d a rope;
If Grant is armed to join M‘Leod
The enemy is soon subdued.’

[558] App. 39. C. of G., ii. 200. (From Banff.) Macleod very sorry that Grant is not to join him at Inverurie, but he knows best what Loudoun has directed.

[558] App. 39. C. of G., ii. 200. (From Banff.) Macleod is really disappointed that Grant won't be joining him at Inverurie, but he understands that Grant knows best what Loudoun has instructed.

[559] App. 40. C. of G., ii. 202. (From Castle Grant.)

[559] App. 40. C. of G., ii. 202. (From Castle Grant.)

[560] App. 41. C. of G., ii. 205. (From Elgin.)

[560] App. 41. C. of G., ii. 205. (From Elgin.)

[561] For a detailed account of the action at Inverurie on 23rd December, see ante, p. 140 et seq.

[561] For a detailed account of the action at Inverurie on December 23rd, see ante, p. 140 et seq.

[562] App. 42. Mr. Grant to the Magistrates of Elgin, dated 29th Dec., in answer to their Letter following.—I received your Letter of yesterdays date signed by you and the Magistrates of Elgin, informing me that Macleod and his men were then marching from your Town towards Inverness and that you are now exposed to the same oppression with the other Burghs to the East. As you had Intelligence that there are 500 men ready at Strathbogie to come over, who have sworn heavy vengeance against you. How far it may be in my Power to give them a check, and to prevent the oppression they threaten you with, I dare not positively say; but I assure you, I have all the Inclinations in the world to be of as much Service to my Friends and neighbours during these troublesome Times as I possibly can. Upon the 10th of this month I was informed that the Party under Abbachys Command was levying the Cess and raising men in a most oppressive manner in Banffshire, and that they were to detach a large Party to your Town, and were threatning to use the same acts of violence against you. As at that Time I knew nothing of the Relief that was acoming to you from Inverness. I conveened upon the 12th the most of the Gentlemen of the Country and about 500 of the men, and marched directly to Mulben with an Intention to cover your Town and Country, and to assist my Friends and neighbours in the County of Banff. All this I did without any advice or Concert with those entrusted at Inverness, only the very day I marched from this, I wrote and acquainted them of my Intention; but as they imagined they had sent Force sufficient to clear all betwixt them and Aberdeen, I found it was not expected that I should proceed further than Keith or my own Estate of Mulben; however as I was resolved to chase the Rebells out of Banffshire, if in my Power I proceeded to Strathbogg where I remained two nights, and then finding that I was not desired or encouraged to go further, I returned home, leaving a party of 60 men, with officers in Mulben to prevent any small partys of the Rebells either from visiting you or oppressing that neighbourhood. My Party continued there till all the M‘Leods had passed in their way to Elgin; but then the officers there thought it was not proper for so small a body to remain longer, when Such numbers of the Rebells were so near them. My present opinion is that you may all be easy, unless you hear that a much greater body come from Aberdeen to join that at Strathbogie for these at Strathbogie will never venture to cross Spey, when I am above them and Lord Loudon is so near them. Altho the MacLeods have marched to Inverness, I am persuaded Lord Loudon will send another body sufficient to give a check to those at Strathbogie. In the situation I am at present in I am uncertain whether I am to be attacked from Perth or by those at Aberdeen and Strathbogie for my late March. I dare not promise to march with any body of Men but in Concert and with Lord Loudons Directions. And at the same Time I have demanded to be assisted with arms, and encouraged to keep my Men in the proper way. There is no body can wish the Peace and happiness of my Friends in the Town of Elgin than I do. And I shall always be ready to use my best Endeavours towards preserving the Tranquility you at present enjoy.—I am, etc.

[562] App. 42. Mr. Grant to the Magistrates of Elgin, dated December 29, in response to their letter.—I received your letter from yesterday, signed by you and the Magistrates of Elgin, informing me that Macleod and his men were marching from your town towards Inverness and that you are now facing the same oppression as the other towns to the east. You mentioned you had intelligence that there are 500 men ready at Strathbogie to come over, who have sworn to take heavy revenge against you. I cannot say for sure how much I can help prevent the oppression they threaten, but I assure you I’m fully inclined to assist my friends and neighbors during these troubling times as much as I can. On the 10th of this month, I learned that the party under Abbachy's command was collecting taxes and raising men in a very oppressive manner in Banffshire, and they planned to send a large group to your town and were threatening to use the same violence against you. At that time, I was unaware of the relief that was coming to you from Inverness. On the 12th, I gathered most of the gentlemen in the area and about 500 men, and marched directly to Mulben intending to protect your town and countryside and assist my friends and neighbors in Banff County. I did all this without any prior consultation with those in charge at Inverness, only informing them of my intentions on the day I left. Since they believed they had sent enough force to clear the area between them and Aberdeen, they did not expect me to go further than Keith or my own estate at Mulben; however, I was determined to drive the rebels out of Banffshire if I could, so I proceeded to Strathbogie, where I stayed for two nights. Then, realizing that I was neither encouraged nor expected to go further, I returned home, leaving a party of 60 men, with officers, in Mulben to prevent any small groups of rebels from visiting you or oppressing that area. My party remained there until all the MacLeods passed on their way to Elgin; however, the officers there felt it wasn’t wise for such a small number to stay any longer with the rebels so close by. I currently believe you can rest easy unless you hear that a much larger force is coming from Aberdeen to join those at Strathbogie, as the ones at Strathbogie will never dare cross the Spey while I am above them and Lord Loudon is so near. Although the MacLeods have marched to Inverness, I believe Lord Loudon will send additional forces sufficient to check those at Strathbogie. Given my current situation, I’m uncertain whether I will be attacked from Perth or by those at Aberdeen and Strathbogie because of my recent march. I cannot promise to march with any forces without coordinating with Lord Loudon’s directions. At the same time, I have requested support with arms and encouragement to keep my men in line. No one desires the peace and happiness of my friends in the town of Elgin more than I do, and I will always be ready to make my best efforts to preserve the tranquility you currently enjoy.—I am, etc.

The Magistrates of Elgins Letter to Mr. Grant, dated December 28th, 1745.—The Laird of M‘Leod and his Men are this moment marching from this Place towards Inverness, so that we are left exposed to the like Ravage and oppression which other Burghs and Counties to the East of us labour under. And unless we be immediately favoured with your Protection, we and many others of the principal Inhabitants must remove with our best effects to some Place of Safety without loss of Time. By Intelligence we have from the other side of Spey there are 500 at Strathbogie ready to come over and who have threatned a heavy vengeance upon us, so that we have all the Reason in the World to guard against the Blow in some shape or other. We therefore begg you may give us a positive and Speedy Answer. And we are respectfully, Honble Sir, Your most humble Servants.

The Magistrates of Elgin's Letter to Mr. Grant, dated December 28th, 1745.—The Laird of M‘Leod and his men are currently marching from this place towards Inverness, leaving us vulnerable to the same destruction and oppression that other towns and counties to the east of us are suffering. Unless we receive your protection immediately, many of us, including several key residents, will have to relocate with our belongings to a safe place without delay. According to information we received from the other side of the Spey, there are 500 men at Strathbogie ready to cross over, and they've threatened us with severe consequences, so we have every reason to prepare for an attack in some way. We therefore ask for a quick and definitive response from you. We remain, respectfully, Honble Sir, your most humble servants.

[563] App. 43. Sir Harry Innes to Mr. Grant, dated 28th Dec.—The desertion among all the Companys has been so great that M‘Leod is resolved to march to Forress, and for ought I know to Inverness. This will lay this Town and Country open to the Insults of the Rebells. Therefore the Magistrates have writ you and have desired me to do the same, desiring you may march Such a body of your Men here as will secure the Peace of the Country and Town; but as you are best Judge of this.—I am, Dr Sir, etc.

[563] App. 43. Sir Harry Innes to Mr. Grant, dated 28th Dec.—The desertion among all the Companies has been so significant that M‘Leod is determined to march to Forress, and possibly to Inverness. This will leave this Town and Country vulnerable to the attacks of the Rebels. Therefore, the Magistrates have written to you and have asked me to do the same, requesting that you send a contingent of your Men here to ensure the Peace of the Country and Town; but as you are the best judge of this.—I am, Dr Sir, etc.

P.S.—We had yesterday the accounts of the Highland Armys being totally routed and dispersed betwixt Manchester and Preston betwixt the 13th and 14th. The Prince as he is called flying in great haste with about 100 horse. The Duke of Perth amongst the Prisoners. If M‘Leod marches I must with him or go to you, but I think I shall go to Inverness for I am not liked at present by many.

P.S.—Yesterday, we received news that the Highland Armies were completely defeated and scattered between Manchester and Preston on the 13th and 14th. The Prince, as he’s called, fled quickly with about 100 horsemen. The Duke of Perth is among the prisoners. If M‘Leod marches, I must either go with him or come to you, but I think I’ll head to Inverness because I'm not well-liked by many at the moment.

Sir Harry Innes to Mr. Grant, dated 28th Dec., probably from Innes House.—I wrote you this forenoon from Elgin, which I suppose would or will be delivered to you by one of the Council of Elgin. As M‘Leod was then resolved upon Marching here, they were determined to apply to you for some Relief and Support for their Town and Country in General. I have and must do M‘Leod Justice. He is far from loading you with any share of their late unlucky disaster, and would willingly act in Concert with you for the Common well, but to his great Surprise when he came here, he found that his men who had deserted in place of going to Inverness had mostly past from Findorn to the Ross side. So he does not know when or where they may meet. This has hindered him from writing to you to desire you to bring your men to Elgin in order to act with his. Altho he had desired this from no other authority, or any Reasons, but your doing the best for the common Cause, but this unlucky passing of his men at Findorn has prevented his writing as he told the Provost of Elgin he was to do. For these Reasons I run you this Express that you may think how to act. I go to Lord Loudon and the President tomorrow, and will return to M‘Leod Monday forenoon.—My Complements, etc.

Sir Harry Innes to Mr. Grant, dated December 28th, probably from Innes House.—I wrote to you this morning from Elgin, which I assume is being delivered to you by someone from the Council of Elgin. Since M‘Leod was determined to march here, they were set on asking you for some support for their town and the surrounding area. I have to give M‘Leod credit. He isn’t trying to put any blame on you for their recent unfortunate situation and would gladly work with you for the common good. However, to his surprise, when he got here, he discovered that most of his men who had deserted instead of going to Inverness had actually gone from Findorn to the Ross side. So, he has no idea when or where they might reunite. This has stopped him from asking you to bring your men to Elgin to work alongside his. Although he had only asked this because it would be best for the common cause, the unfortunate desertion of his men at Findorn led to him not writing as he had told the Provost of Elgin he would. For these reasons, I'm sending you this message so you can consider how to proceed. I'm going to see Lord Loudon and the President tomorrow and will return to M‘Leod on Monday morning.—Best wishes, etc.

P.—The President writ me that Lord Deskfoord is gone for London in the Hound and that they sailed the 25th.

P.—The President wrote to me that Lord Deskfoord has gone to London on the Hound and that they set sail on the 25th.

[564] App. 44. C. of G., ii. 208. (From Inverness.)

[564] App. 44. C. of G., ii. 208. (From Inverness.)

[565] App. 45. Mr. Grant to Lord Loudon, dated the 9th Jany 1745-6.—Inclosed your Lordship has a letter I received this day from John Grant Chamberlain of Urquhart. The subject contained in it gives me the greatest uneasiness. I thought I had taken such measures as to prevent any of the Gentlemen or Tenants of that country from so much as thinking to favour the Rebells far less to join them. I have sent the Bearer James Grant my Chamberlain of Strathspey, who has several Relations in that Country to concur with John Grant my Chamberlain of Urquhart in every Measure that can prevent these unhappy People from pursuing their Intentions of joining the Rebells. And I have ordered him to obey any further Orders or Instructions your Lordship shall give him for that purpose, and I am hopefull I’ll get the better of that mad villain Currymony who is misleading that poor unhappy People.

[565] App. 45. Mr. Grant to Lord Loudon, dated the 9th of January 1745-6.—Enclosed is a letter I received today from John Grant, Chamberlain of Urquhart. The topic it addresses causes me great concern. I believed I had taken steps to ensure that none of the Gentlemen or Tenants from that area would even think about supporting the Rebels, let alone join them. I've sent James Grant, my Chamberlain of Strathspey, who has several relatives in that area, to work with John Grant, my Chamberlain of Urquhart, on any action that can stop these unfortunate people from pursuing their plans to join the Rebels. I've instructed him to follow any further orders or guidance your Lordship provides for that purpose, and I hope to manage that reckless villain Currymony, who is leading those poor, misguided people astray.

That I may not weary your Lordship, I’ll leave to him to tell you all that he knows relating to that country. I have just now received the Inclosed from Lord Strechin by Mr. Sime Minister of Longmay: My Lord Strichen did all in his Power to save my Friend Lieutenant Grant from being taken Prisoner, even to the hazard of his own Life. I would gladly march to relieve him as my Lord Strichen suggests in his Letter, but I take it for granted that that Thing is impossible, for I could not march to that Country with any Body of men but the Rebells must have notice of it, and would send my Friend to Aberdeen and so forward to Glames, where the rest of the Prisoners are. I am hopeful the Kinghorn Boat on board of which my Friend came to Fraserburgh is by this time arrived at Inverness, but least it should not, I send your Lordship with the Bearer the two last Newspapers from Edinr, which came by Lieutenant Grant who luckily delivered them with my Letters to Lord Strichen, before he was made Prisoner. And I must refer it to the Bearer to inform your Lorp. of the manner of Mr. Grant’s landing and being taken Prisoner. Mr. Syme who brought me Lord Strichens letter informs that Mr. Grant told that part of the Duke of Cumberland’s horse arrived at Edinburgh Wednesday last. That the Duke of Cumberland arrived at Edinburgh on Thursday last with a great body of horse, and the foot were following. I think it my duty to take notice to your Lop. that the Rebells are exerting themselves in every corner of the North to increase their army. I therefore think it absolutely necessary that all the Friends of the Government should use their outmost efforts to disconcert and disperse them. I had a meeting yesterday with all the Gentlemen of this Country, and I can assure your Lop. we wait only your orders and Directions, and there is nothing in our Power, but we will do upon this important occasion for the Service of our King and Country. I wish it was possible to assist us with some arms, and money to be sure also would be necessary; but give me Leave to assure your Lordship that the last farthing I or any of my Friends have, or what our Credite can procure us, shall be employed in supporting of our men upon any Expedition your Lordship shall direct us to undertake for this glorious Cause we are engaged in. I wish to God your Lordship and the Lord President would think of some measure of conveening the whole body of the Kings Friends in the north together, and I would gladly hope we would form such a body, as would in a great measure disconcert and strike a damp upon the army of the Rebells in the South, and effectually put a stop to any further Junctions they may expect benorth Stirling and at the same Time surely we might prevent their being masters of so much of the North Coast, and also hinder many of the Kings Subjects from being oppressed by the exorbitant sums of money the Rebells are presently levying from them. Complements etc.

To avoid tiring you, I'll leave it to him to update you on everything he knows about that region. I just received the enclosed letter from Lord Strichen via Mr. Syme, the Minister of Longmay: Lord Strichen did everything he could to save my friend, Lieutenant Grant, from being captured, even putting his own life at risk. I would gladly march to rescue him, as Lord Strichen suggests in his letter, but I assume that’s impossible because the Rebels would definitely notice and would send my friend to Aberdeen and then onward to Glames, where the other prisoners are. I hope the Kinghorn boat that my friend took to Fraserburgh has by now reached Inverness, but in case it hasn’t, I’m sending your Lordship the last two newspapers from Edinburgh, which came with Lieutenant Grant, who fortunately delivered them along with my letters to Lord Strichen before he was captured. I’ll leave it to the bearer to inform your Lordship about how Mr. Grant landed and was captured. Mr. Syme, who brought me Lord Strichen's letter, reports that Mr. Grant mentioned that part of the Duke of Cumberland’s horse arrived in Edinburgh last Wednesday, and that the Duke himself arrived on Thursday with a large force of cavalry, with infantry following behind. I think it’s important to inform your Lordship that the Rebels are working hard in every corner of the North to grow their army. Therefore, I believe it’s absolutely necessary that all supporters of the government do everything they can to disrupt and scatter them. I met yesterday with all the gentlemen from this area, and I can assure you we are only waiting for your orders and directions—there's nothing we will not do for our King and Country in this critical situation. I wish we could get some arms, and money would certainly be necessary as well; but please allow me to assure your Lordship that every last penny I or my friends have, or what we can borrow on credit, will be used to support our forces in any mission your Lordship directs us to undertake for this noble cause we're involved in. I truly wish your Lordship and the Lord President would consider ways to gather all the King's supporters in the North together; I believe we could form a group that would significantly disrupt and dampen the Rebels' army in the South and effectively stop any further unions they might expect north of Stirling. At the same time, we could surely prevent them from controlling so much of the North Coast and also safeguard many of the King’s subjects from the excessive amounts of money the Rebels are currently imposing on them. Regards, etc.

[566] App. 46. Lord Loudon to Mr. Grant, dated 16 Jany. 1745-6.—I have had the Honour of two Letters from you since I had an opportunity of writing to you. I think your scheme of relieving the low Country is a very good one; but in the present situation until I have a Return of the Letters I have sent for Instructions, and a little more certainty of the motions of the Rebells, I dare not give them any opportunity of Slipping by the short road over the hills into this Country and of course into possession of the Fort. Whilst I am in the low Country, as soon as Instructions arrive, I shall be sure to acquaint you, and consult with you the most effectual way of doing real Service to our Master and our Country. I begg my Complements etc.

[566] App. 46. Lord Loudon to Mr. Grant, dated 16 Jan. 1745-6.—I've received two letters from you since I last wrote. I think your idea of helping the low country is great; however, given the current situation, until I get a response to the letters I sent for instructions and a bit more clarity on the rebels' movements, I can’t risk giving them a chance to slip through the hills into this area and take control of the fort. While I'm in the low country, as soon as I receive instructions, I'll be sure to let you know and discuss the best way to truly serve our king and our country. Please give my regards, etc.

[567] The Prince arrived at Blair Castle 6th February, and left on the 9th.

[567] The Prince got to Blair Castle on February 6th and departed on the 9th.

[568] App. 47. C. of G., ii. 222. (From Inverness.) Giving news of the abandonment of the siege of Stirling Castle by the Jacobites and their retreat to the north. The desertion among them has been very great, and it will take time to re-collect their people before they can hurt us.

[568] App. 47. C. of G., ii. 222. (From Inverness.) Reporting that the Jacobites have given up the siege of Stirling Castle and are retreating north. They have seen a significant amount of desertion, and it will take time to regroup their forces before they pose any threat to us.

[569] App. 48. Intelligence sent to Lord Loudon by Mr. Grant, 9th February 1746.—Last Thursday Mr. Grant sent by a Ministers son not having had time to write, being busied in his own Preparations, Intelligence of the Rebells motions, and what was said by some of their leaders to be their Intention.

[569] App. 48. Information sent to Lord Loudon by Mr. Grant, February 9, 1746. — Last Thursday, Mr. Grant sent information about the rebels' movements and what some of their leaders said their intentions were through a minister's son, as he didn't have time to write himself due to being busy with his own preparations.

Saturday morning he wrote M‘Leod the substance of it with the orders then brought to Badenoch, which as M‘Leod would forward was unnecessary for Mr. Grant to do. Since the above many confirmations of it have arrived but nothing new all this day.

Saturday morning he wrote M’Leod the details of it with the orders then sent to Badenoch, which, as M’Leod would agree, was unnecessary for Mr. Grant to do. Since then, many confirmations of it have arrived, but nothing new all day.

The inclosed is a copy of their Resolutions taken at their Meeting in Badenoch, where Cluny was present and approved of them.

The enclosed is a copy of their resolutions made at their meeting in Badenoch, where Cluny was present and approved them.

Many of the M‘phersons came home before Cluny and many of them expressed Resolutions not to be further concerned; but how far they will be steady is uncertain.

Many of the M‘phersons returned home before Cluny, and a lot of them stated they had decided not to get involved further; but it’s unclear how committed they will really be.

It is said by pretty good authority, that the Glengerry men after the Interment of Angus MacDonald openly and in a body left the army, and many of the Camerons followed their example. It is certain most of Keppoch’s men were at home some time ago, but people are sent to use their outmost Endeavours to bring all the above back, and influence what more they can, for which purpose it is said they will remain at least two days at Badenoch.

It is said by reliable sources that the Glengerry men, after the burial of Angus MacDonald, openly left the army together, and many of the Camerons followed suit. It's certain that most of Keppoch’s men were home a while ago, but people have been sent to do everything they can to bring everyone back and persuade others to return as well. For this reason, it's said they will stay for at least two days in Badenoch.

Their Prince was said to be at Cluny last night, but the men remaining with him, and coming through the hills to be only in the Country this night.

Their Prince was reportedly at Cluny last night, but the men who stayed with him are now traveling through the hills and will only be in the area tonight.

A deserter from those coming by the Coast, and who only left them in Angus, says Duke Cumberland was entering Stirling, as last of their army was going out, Confirms the great desertion since the battle, and asserts it continues dayly, also that there is no division coming by Braemar.

A deserter from the group traveling along the Coast, who only separated from them in Angus, reports that Duke Cumberland was entering Stirling just as the last of their army was leaving. He confirms the significant desertion since the battle and claims it’s happening daily, adding that there’s no division coming through Braemar.

The above Deserters and others and Letters say that Clanhatton, Farquharsons, French, Pitsligo, Angus, Mearns and Aberdeenshire People came by the Coast for whom Billets were ordered last Wednesday at Aberdeen, and that some M‘Donalds, M‘Kenzies, Frasers, M‘Leods, Camerons, Stewarts, M‘Phersons, Athole and Drummond men are coming by the Hills.

The deserters mentioned above, along with others and their letters, state that people from Clanhatton, Farquharsons, French, Pitsligo, Angus, Mearns, and Aberdeenshire traveled along the coast, for whom accommodation was arranged last Wednesday in Aberdeen. They also note that some MacDonalds, MacKenzies, Frasers, MacLeods, Camerons, Stewarts, MacPhersons, and men from Athole and Drummond are coming through the hills.

Some Clatters say they wont disturb Strathspey, and others that it is their formed Plan to march through and disarm it, and join the rest in Murray. The Truth is not yet known. There are some Rumours from the South that part of the Duke’s Army are following briskly by the Coast, and that upon the Rebells leaving Stirling, two Regiments were ordered to embark for Inverness. Mr. Grant and all his Friends have been alert as desired. Many spyes are employed and what is material shall be communicated.

Some Clatters say they won't disturb Strathspey, while others claim it's their plan to march through and disarm it, then join the rest in Murray. The truth isn't clear yet. There are some rumors from the south that part of the Duke's army is actively moving along the coast, and that when the rebels left Stirling, two regiments were ordered to board ships for Inverness. Mr. Grant and all his friends have been vigilant as requested. Many spies are involved, and any important information will be shared.

The Bearer will explain Mr. Grants numbers and present distribution of them, with the various Instructions given for the different occurences that may happen. In the general it may be depended upon, that Mr. Grant will act zealously with his whole Power in every shape that shall be judged best, suitable to the hearty Professions he hath all along made, and upon a closer scrutiny finds he could bring furth 5 or 600 more good and trusty men if he had arms, than he can in the present condition. If there are arms to be given the Bearer will concert their Conveyance.

The Bearer will explain Mr. Grant's numbers and how they will be distributed, along with the various instructions for the different situations that may arise. Generally, it's safe to say that Mr. Grant will act passionately and with all his power in whatever way is deemed best, based on the sincere commitments he has made all along. Upon closer examination, he finds that he could recruit 500 to 600 more good and trustworthy men if he had weapons, compared to what he can do under the current circumstances. If there are weapons to be distributed, the Bearer will arrange for their delivery.

Sunday 8 at night. This moment fresh Intelligence arrived from Rothemurkus as follows. It confirms most of what is above.

Sunday 8 at night. This moment fresh information arrived from Rothemurkus as follows. It confirms most of what is above.

They are ignorant in Badenoch of the present root of the army, and conceal their Losses as much as possible, but acknowledge they lost considerably before Stirling, and obliged to leave behind them seven heavy cannon of their own, and part of their Ammunition and Baggage, with all the Cannon and Ammunition taken from the King’s army.

They are unaware in Badenoch of the current situation of the army, and they try to hide their losses as much as possible, but they admit they lost a lot before Stirling and had to leave behind seven heavy cannons, some of their ammunition and baggage, as well as all the cannons and ammunition taken from the King’s army.

That they have brought north all their Prisoners. The Duke was advanced as far as Perth. Their Prince is to be at Ruthven tomorrow where his Fieldpieces and five, and some say 9 battering Cannon is arrived. Tho they conceal their designs with great secrecy the Prisoner officers conjecture their design is against Inverness. All the men of Strathern are gone home and to meet the Army in its way to Inverness, which is to go through Strathspey, and the Division coming by the Coast to march through Murray. They call these in Badenoch seven Regiments, made up of the people above mentioned.

They have brought all their prisoners north. The Duke has moved up to Perth. Their Prince is set to be at Ruthven tomorrow where his field pieces and five, and some say nine, heavy cannons have arrived. Even though they keep their plans under wraps, the captured officers suspect their goal is Inverness. All the men from Strathern have gone home to meet the Army on its way to Inverness, which will pass through Strathspey, while the division coming by the coast will march through Murray. They refer to these in Badenoch as seven regiments, made up of the people mentioned above.

That many the writer conversed with declared they were sick of the present Business, and wish for a sufficient Force to protect them at home.

That many of the people the writer talked to said they were tired of the current situation and wished for enough strength to keep them safe at home.

One man says he heard their Prince declare he would quarter next Tuesday in the house of Rothemurkus.

One guy says he heard their Prince announce that he would be staying next Tuesday at the house of Rothemurkus.

Some means are employed to endeavour to increase the desertion and to create some dissention. If they prove effectual the Conclusion will be quicker and easier.

Some methods are used to try to increase desertion and stir up some disagreement. If they work, the conclusion will come faster and be easier.

[570] App. 49. C. of G., ii. 225. (From Castle Grant.) A long letter of various items of intelligence.

[570] App. 49. C. of G., ii. 225. (From Castle Grant.) A lengthy letter containing various pieces of information.

[571] App. 50. C. of G., ii. 224. (From Inverness.) Though a supply of arms has come it is impossible to send them and men must come for them. He will be glad to consult and co-operate with Grant. He has brought back troops from Forres and needs money: will Grant send him the cess he has collected.

[571] Approx. 50. C. of G., ii. 224. (From Inverness.) Although a supply of weapons has arrived, it’s impossible to deliver them, so the men need to come and collect them. He is eager to discuss and work together with Grant. He has returned with troops from Forres and requires funds: will Grant send him the tax he has collected?

App. 51. C. of G., ii. 223. (From Culloden.) The Aberdeen rebels much discouraged, for the most part separated, and will not easily be brought together again. The Jacobites’ intention is to capture Inverness and force all the neighbourhood into their service. Glengarry’s and Keppoch’s people and the Camerons are almost all gone home, but leaders are sent to fetch them out. All this will give time to the friends of government.

App. 51. C. of G., ii. 223. (From Culloden.) The Aberdeen rebels are feeling very discouraged, and most of them have dispersed, making it hard to reunite them. The Jacobites plan to take Inverness and compel everyone in the area to join their cause. Glengarry's, Keppoch's men, and the Camerons have mostly gone home, but leaders have been sent to bring them back. This situation will give the supporters of the government more time.

[572] App. 52. C. of G., ii. 232. (From Castle Grant.) A long letter of details of intelligence of the movements of the Jacobite army.

[572] App. 52. C. of G., ii. 232. (From Castle Grant.) A lengthy letter providing detailed information about the movements of the Jacobite army.

[573] App. 53. Further Intelligence, dated 15th Feb. 1746, Saturday 7 o’clock at night.—Two persons confirm that Letters from Lord Loudon, etc., were stopt at Ruthven. One of them says the Bearer was hanged this morning. Both agree the Bridges on the road to Athole are broke doun, That the Castle of Ruthven was burnt last night, and stables this morning. The Prince to be at Inverlaidnan this night, some of his People in Strathern,[665] the last at Avemore. The Macphersons to march to-morrow all for Inverness. Best Judges call them about 5000. The Campbells were at Blair. The Duke certainly at Perth the 12th. The Hessians certainly landed at Leith. Several Expresses for this are stopt. You know better than we do what is doing in Murray.

[573] App. 53. Further Intelligence, dated February 15, 1746, Saturday at 7 PM.—Two people have confirmed that letters from Lord Loudon, etc., were stopped at Ruthven. One of them reports that the messenger was hanged this morning. Both agree that the bridges on the road to Athole are destroyed, that the Castle of Ruthven was burned down last night, and the stables were set on fire this morning. The Prince is supposed to be at Inverlaidnan tonight, with some of his people in Strathern, and the latest are at Avemore. The Macphersons will march tomorrow all the way to Inverness. The best estimates say they have about 5,000 people. The Campbells were at Blair. The Duke was certainly in Perth on the 12th. The Hessians have certainly landed at Leith. Several messages regarding this have been stopped. You know better than we do what is happening in Murray. [665]

[574] Near Carrbridge.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Near Carrbridge.

[575] App. 54. Lord Loudon to Mr. Grant, dated Inverness, 15th Feb.—I have been honoured with a Letter from you last night, and another this morning, and I have seen yours to the Governor, all with the Intelligence which you have got for which I am very much obliged to you, and as we have had notice some time I hope if they do come, we shall be able to give them such a Reception as they will not like. I expect to be reinforced with 900 or 1000 men in two days, and every day to grow stronger. I have thought seriously on every method of sending you arms; but do not see as we are threatned with an attack, that I can answer sending such a detachment from hence. A march that must take up 4 days, as well bring the arms safe to you. Consider the Clan hattonn[666] are all come home. The Frasers and the Gentlemen of Badenoch are appointed to intercept them, and if we have any Business it must be over before they return. As to the number you mention, you know how small the number is, I have to give, and how many demands are made on me, and by people who are none of them near so well provided as you are. If you can send down 300 men, I shall endeavour to provide them as well as I can that is the outmost I can do. You are very good as you be advanced to send us constantly what accounts you get, but by all I can learn your accounts magnify their numbers greatly. I beg you will make my Compliment to all ffriends.—I am with real Esteem and Sincerity, Dr. Sir, yours etc.

[575] App. 54. Lord Loudon to Mr. Grant, dated Inverness, 15th Feb.—I received your letter last night and another this morning, and I’ve also seen your message to the Governor. I really appreciate the information you’ve provided. Since we’ve been aware of this situation for a while, I hope that if they do come, we can give them a welcome they won’t enjoy. I expect to be reinforced with 900 to 1000 men in two days, and I will continue to grow stronger each day. I’ve seriously considered every way to send you arms, but given that we’re being threatened with an attack, I don’t think I can justify sending a detachment from here. The march would take four days, and I need to ensure the arms arrive safely. Remember, the Clan hattonn[666] are all back home. The Frasers and the Gentlemen of Badenoch are tasked with intercepting them, and if we have any plans, they need to be completed before they return. Regarding the number you mentioned, you know how limited my supply is and how many demands I’m facing from people who aren’t as well-off as you are. If you can send 300 men, I’ll do my best to equip them, but that’s the most I can manage. I appreciate your efforts to keep us updated with information, but from what I’ve learned, your reports seem to exaggerate their numbers. Please send my regards to all our friends. I remain, with genuine esteem and sincerity, your doctor, etc.

[576] This date not quite right. The ‘Rout of Moy’ took place on the 17th. Loudoun evacuated Inverness on the 18th, and the Jacobite army reached the town the same day. The castle (Fort George), garrisoned partly by Grant’s company and commanded by his uncle, surrendered to the Prince on February 20th. (Scots Mag., viii. p. 92.)

[576] This date isn't quite right. The 'Rout of Moy' happened on the 17th. Loudoun left Inverness on the 18th, and the Jacobite army arrived in the town the same day. The castle (Fort George), partly occupied by Grant’s company and led by his uncle, surrendered to the Prince on February 20th. (Scots Mag., viii. p. 92.)

[577] Sir Everard Fawkener, secretary to the Duke of Cumberland; b. 1684; originally a London mercer and silk merchant; the friend and host of Voltaire in England 1726-29; abandoned commerce for diplomacy; knighted and sent as ambassador to Constantinople 1735; became secretary to the Duke of Cumberland, and served with him in the Flanders campaign; for his services was made joint postmaster-general 1745; accompanied the Duke throughout his campaign in Scotland 1746; d. 1758.

[577] Sir Everard Fawkener, secretary to the Duke of Cumberland; born in 1684; originally a London merchant dealing in fabrics and silk; he was a friend and host to Voltaire in England from 1726 to 1729; left business for a career in diplomacy; knighted and appointed ambassador to Constantinople in 1735; became secretary to the Duke of Cumberland and served with him during the Flanders campaign; for his contributions, he was named joint postmaster-general in 1745; accompanied the Duke throughout his campaign in Scotland in 1746; died in 1758.

[578] The Duke of Cumberland arrived at Aberdeen on February 27th or 28th.

[578] The Duke of Cumberland reached Aberdeen on February 27th or 28th.

[579] Not the modern Castle Forbes on the Don, in Keig parish, but the old Castle Forbes at Druminnor, in the parish of Auchindoir and Kearn.

[579] Not the modern Castle Forbes on the Don, in Keig parish, but the old Castle Forbes at Druminnor, in the parish of Auchindoir and Kearn.

[580] Cumberland crossed the Spey on April 12th.

[580] Cumberland crossed the Spey on April 12.

[581] Fort Augustus surrendered to the Jacobites, March 5th.

[581] Fort Augustus gave in to the Jacobites on March 5th.

[582] Alexander, the father, had died, a prisoner, before 29th July. He died a natural death, but in Glenurquhart it was believed that he was burned to death in a barrel of tar. (Wm. Mackay, Urquhart and Glenmoriston, p. 288.)

[582] Alexander, the father, had died, a prisoner, before July 29th. He passed away naturally, but in Glenurquhart, people believed he was burned to death in a barrel of tar. (Wm. Mackay, Urquhart and Glenmoriston, p. 288.)

[583] Not dated, but must have been written before 29th July, i.e. prior to Sheugly’s death.

[583] Not dated, but it must have been written before July 29th, i.e. before Sheugly’s death.

[584] Sir Dudley Ryder (1691-1756) was Attorney-General 1737-54; prosecuted the Jacobite prisoners of 1746; appointed Lord Chief-Justice, 1754; cr. Baron Ryder of Harrowby 1756, and died the same year.

[584] Sir Dudley Ryder (1691-1756) served as Attorney-General from 1737 to 1754; he prosecuted the Jacobite prisoners in 1746; was appointed Lord Chief Justice in 1754; was created Baron Ryder of Harrowby in 1756, and passed away the same year.

[585] Hon. William Murray (1705-92), fourth son of David, 5th Viscount Stormont. He was Solicitor-General 1742-54, and the active prosecutor of Lord Lovat; Attorney-General 1754-56; Lord Chief-Justice 1756-88; created Baron Mansfield 1756, and Earl of Mansfield 1776. His father and eldest brother were denounced as rebels, fined and imprisoned for their conduct in 1715. His brother James (c. 1690-1770) attached himself to the court of the Chevalier de St. George; in 1718 he was plenipotentiary for negotiating the marriage of James. In 1721 he was created (Jacobite) Earl of Dunbar, and he was Secretary of State at the court in Rome, 1727 to 1747; he was dismissed in the latter year at the desire of Prince Charles, who deemed him responsible for the Duke of York’s entering the Church; he retired to Avignon, where he died s.p. in 1770.

[585] Hon. William Murray (1705-92), the fourth son of David, 5th Viscount Stormont. He served as Solicitor-General from 1742 to 1754 and was the main prosecutor of Lord Lovat; he was Attorney-General from 1754 to 1756, and Lord Chief Justice from 1756 to 1788. He was made Baron Mansfield in 1756 and became Earl of Mansfield in 1776. His father and oldest brother were labeled as rebels, fined, and imprisoned for their actions in 1715. His brother James (c. 1690-1770) aligned with the court of the Chevalier de St. George; by 1718, he was appointed as plenipotentiary to negotiate James's marriage. In 1721, he was granted the title of (Jacobite) Earl of Dunbar and served as Secretary of State at the court in Rome from 1727 to 1747; he was dismissed in 1747 at Prince Charles's request, who held him responsible for the Duke of York’s joining the Church. He retired to Avignon, where he died s.p. in 1770.

Murray’s sisters entertained Prince Charles in the house of their brother, Lord Stormont, at Perth from the 4th to the 10th April 1745.

Murray’s sisters hosted Prince Charles at their brother Lord Stormont's house in Perth from April 4th to April 10th, 1745.

[586] Solicitor to the Treasury.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Treasury Lawyer.

[587] This report is printed, post, p. 400.

[587] This report is printed, post, p. 400.

[588] Alexander Grossett, a captain in Price’s Regiment (14th, now P. of W. O. West Yorkshire). An engraving, dated 14th Jan. 1747, entitled ‘Rebel Gratitude,’ depicts the death of Lord Robert Ker and Captain Grossett at Culloden. About the latter the following legend is engraved on the print: ‘Captain Grosett, Engineer and Aid de Camp to the General.’ The rebel ‘shot Captain Grosett dead with his own pistol which happened accidentally to fall from him as he was on Horseback, under pretence of restoring the same to the Captain.’ Grossett had been aide-de-camp to General Handasyde; he was serving on General Bland’s staff at Culloden, according to family tradition.

[588] Alexander Grossett, a captain in Price’s Regiment (14th, now P. of W. O. West Yorkshire). An engraving, dated January 14, 1747, titled ‘Rebel Gratitude,’ shows the death of Lord Robert Ker and Captain Grossett at Culloden. About Grossett, the following text is engraved on the print: ‘Captain Grosett, Engineer and Aid de Camp to the General.’ The rebel ‘shot Captain Grosett dead with his own pistol, which accidentally fell from him while he was on horseback, under the guise of returning it to the Captain.’ Grossett had been aide-de-camp to General Handasyde; he was serving on General Bland’s staff at Culloden, according to family tradition.

[589] Sir John Shaw of Greenock, 3rd bart.; he was a cousin of Grossett’s. I have failed to find his name in any record of officers connected with the customs or excise at this time. His father, whom he succeeded in 1702, had been ‘one of H.M. principal tacksmen for the Customs and Excise,’ a pre-Union appointment, and it is possible that the son succeeded to his father’s office or to some of its perquisites. Sir John was M.P. for Renfrewshire 1708-10; for Clackmannanshire 1722-27; and again for Renfrewshire 1727-34. He married Margaret, d. of Sir Hew Dalrymple of North Berwick 1700, and died 1752.

[589] Sir John Shaw of Greenock, the 3rd baronet; he was a cousin of Grossett’s. I haven’t been able to find his name in any records of officers related to customs or excise during this time. His father, whom he succeeded in 1702, had been ‘one of H.M. principal tacksmen for the Customs and Excise,’ a position that existed before the Union, and it’s possible that the son took over his father's role or some of its benefits. Sir John was an MP for Renfrewshire from 1708 to 1710; for Clackmannanshire from 1722 to 1727; and again for Renfrewshire from 1727 to 1734. He married Margaret, daughter of Sir Hew Dalrymple of North Berwick, in 1700, and passed away in 1752.

[590] Letter i. p. 379.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter i. p. 379.

[591] Brigadier-General Thomas Fowke was the officer left by Cope in command of the cavalry stationed at Stirling and Edinburgh when he went on his march to the Highlands. Fowke fled with the cavalry on the approach of the Jacobite army, and joined Cope at Dunbar. He was present, second in command, at Prestonpans. His conduct, along with that of Cope and Colonel Peregrine Lascelles, was investigated by a military court of inquiry, presided over by Field-Marshal Wade in 1746. All were acquitted.

[591] Brigadier-General Thomas Fowke was the officer left in charge of the cavalry stationed at Stirling and Edinburgh when Cope set out for the Highlands. Fowke and the cavalry ran away as the Jacobite army approached and rejoined Cope at Dunbar. He was present as second in command at Prestonpans. His actions, along with those of Cope and Colonel Peregrine Lascelles, were investigated by a military court of inquiry led by Field-Marshal Wade in 1746. All were cleared of any wrongdoing.

[592] I have failed to find this narrative, but it matters little, as all that Grossett had to say was probably given in his evidence at the trial of Lord Provost Stewart, an account of which was printed in Edinburgh, 1747. It is accessible in public libraries.

[592] I haven't been able to find this story, but it doesn't really matter since everything Grossett had to say was probably included in his testimony during the trial of Lord Provost Stewart, which was published in Edinburgh in 1747. You can find it in public libraries.

[593] See ante, p. 127.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See above, p. 127.

[594] This refers to the capture of Charles Spalding of Whitefield, Strathardle in Atholl, a captain in the Atholl brigade. He was sent from Moffat on 7th November by William, (Jacobite) Duke of Atholl, to Perthshire with despatches, and carried a large number of private letters, which are preserved in the Record Office. He was made prisoner near Kilsyth. There is no mention of Grossett’s presence in the journals of the day, the credit of the capture being given to Brown, the factor of Campbell of Shawfield. (Chron. Atholl and Tullibardine, iii. 86; Scots Mag., vii. 540.) Spalding was tried for his life at Carlisle the following October and acquitted.

[594] This refers to the capture of Charles Spalding from Whitefield, Strathardle in Atholl, who was a captain in the Atholl brigade. He was sent from Moffat on November 7th by William, the Jacobite Duke of Atholl, to Perthshire with important messages, and he carried many private letters, which are kept in the Record Office. He was captured near Kilsyth. There is no mention of Grossett in the day’s journals, and the credit for the capture went to Brown, the factor of Campbell of Shawfield. (Chron. Atholl and Tullibardine, iii. 86; Scots Mag., vii. 540.) Spalding was tried for his life at Carlisle the following October and was acquitted.

[595] The Lord Justice-Clerk had retired to Berwick when the Jacobite army occupied Edinburgh. That army left Edinburgh for good on 1st November, but the Justice-Clerk and the officers of State did not return until the 13th.

[595] The Lord Justice-Clerk had gone to Berwick when the Jacobite army took over Edinburgh. That army left Edinburgh for good on November 1st, but the Justice-Clerk and the government officials didn’t come back until the 13th.

[596] Lieut.-Gen. Roger Handasyde superseded Lieut.-Gen. Guest as Commander-in-Chief in Scotland on his arrival in Edinburgh on 14th November, and held that office until December 5th, when he returned to England. Guest again acted as Commander-in-Chief until relieved by Lieut.-General Hawley, who arrived in Edinburgh on 6th January 1746.

[596] Lieutenant General Roger Handasyde took over from Lieutenant General Guest as Commander-in-Chief in Scotland when he arrived in Edinburgh on November 14th, and he held that position until December 5th, when he went back to England. Guest served as Commander-in-Chief once more until he was replaced by Lieutenant General Hawley, who arrived in Edinburgh on January 6, 1746.

The two infantry regiments that accompanied Handasyde were Price’s (14th) and Ligonier’s (48th). They remained at Edinburgh until December, but after the landing at Montrose of Lord John Drummond with the French Auxiliaries (22nd November), it was felt necessary to guard the passage of the Forth with a stronger force, and the Edinburgh garrison was sent to Stirling, Price’s on 6th December and Ligonier’s on the 9th, where they were joined by the Glasgow and the Paisley militia. The cavalry were also sent to the neighbourhood of Stirling, and Edinburgh was left with no defence but some volunteers and afterwards by an Edinburgh regiment enlisted for three months’ service, of which Lord Home was commandant.

The two infantry regiments that accompanied Handasyde were Price’s (14th) and Ligonier’s (48th). They stayed in Edinburgh until December, but after Lord John Drummond landed at Montrose with the French Auxiliaries on November 22, it became necessary to protect the Forth crossing with a stronger force. The Edinburgh garrison was moved to Stirling, with Price’s regiment leaving on December 6 and Ligonier’s on the 9, where they were joined by the Glasgow and Paisley militias. The cavalry was also sent to the Stirling area, leaving Edinburgh with no defense except for some volunteers and, later, an Edinburgh regiment that was recruited for three months of service, commanded by Lord Home.

[597] Letters ii.-iv. pp. 379-382.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letters 2-4, pp. 379-382.

[598] Letter v. p. 383.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter p. 383.

[599] Letter viii. p. 385.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 8. p. 385.

[600] Letter ix. p. 386.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 9. p. 386.

[601] Letter x. p. 387.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter x. p. 387.

[602] The Glasgow regiment was then five hundred strong. It was commanded by the Earl of Home, who was also colonel of the Edinburgh regiment. There were about a hundred and sixty men of the Paisley regiment, of which the Earl of Glencairn was colonel. (Scots Mag., viii. 30.)

[602] The Glasgow regiment had five hundred soldiers. It was led by the Earl of Home, who was also the colonel of the Edinburgh regiment. There were around one hundred sixty men from the Paisley regiment, where the Earl of Glencairn served as colonel. (Scots Mag., viii. 30.)

[603] Grossett’s account gives the erroneous impression that the infantry was moved to Edinburgh on account of its desertion by the cavalry. According to the Caledonian Mercury and the Scots Mag., the cavalry and the main body of the regular infantry came in together by forced marches from Stirling on the morning of the 24th, ‘men and horses extremely fatigued.’ The west country militia arrived later, by ship from Bo’ness, the intention originally being to send them on to one of the East Lothian or Berwickshire ports (see Lord Justice-Clerk’s letter, xvii. p. 390 post). It was decided, however, not to abandon Edinburgh, so the infantry was kept in the town, but ‘all the dragoons were marched eastward’; the text here locates Haddington as their destination.

[603] Grossett’s account gives the wrong impression that the infantry was sent to Edinburgh because the cavalry deserted them. According to the Caledonian Mercury and the Scots Mag., the cavalry and the main group of regular infantry arrived together after forced marches from Stirling on the morning of the 24th, ‘men and horses extremely fatigued.’ The west country militia arrived later by ship from Bo’ness, with the original plan being to send them to one of the East Lothian or Berwickshire ports (see Lord Justice-Clerk’s letter, xvii. p. 390 post). However, it was decided not to abandon Edinburgh, so the infantry remained in the town, but ‘all the dragoons were marched eastward’; the text specifies Haddington as their destination.

[604] Letters xii.-xviii. pp. 388, 391.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letters 12-18, pp. 388, 391.

[605] Letter xiii. p. 388.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 13. p. 388.

[606] The Milford, on 28th November, captured off Montrose the Louis XV., one of Lord John Drummond’s transports; eighteen officers and one hundred and sixty men were made prisoners, and a large quantity of arms and military stores were taken. The prisoners were confined in Edinburgh Castle until 26th December, when they were sent to Berwick.

[606] The Milford, on November 28th, captured the Louis XV. off Montrose, which was one of Lord John Drummond's transports; eighteen officers and one hundred sixty men were taken prisoner, along with a large amount of weapons and military supplies. The prisoners were held at Edinburgh Castle until December 26th, when they were transferred to Berwick.

[607] Letter xix. p. 391.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 19. p. 391.

[608] Henry C. Hawley; b. c. 1679, d. 1757. Served at Almanza, where he was taken prisoner; Sheriffmuir, where he was wounded; Dettingen and Fontenoy; C.-in-C. at Falkirk; commanded the cavalry at Culloden. Execrated by the Jacobites, and detested by his own soldiers, who dubbed him for his cruelty the Lord Chief-Justice and hangman. He arrived in Edinburgh on January 6th, 1746.

[608] Henry C. Hawley; b. c. 1679, d. 1757. He fought at Almanza, where he was captured; Sheriffmuir, where he was injured; Dettingen and Fontenoy; was Commander-in-Chief at Falkirk; and led the cavalry at Culloden. He was loathed by the Jacobites and hated by his own troops, who called him the Lord Chief-Justice and hangman due to his cruelty. He reached Edinburgh on January 6th, 1746.

[609] In the ‘Narrative’ this sentence begins ‘Mr. Grossett having received certain intelligence which he communicated to Lord Justice Clarke that the rebells....’

[609] In the ‘Narrative’ this sentence begins ‘Mr. Grossett received some information, which he shared with Lord Justice Clarke, that the rebels....’

[610] The ‘Narrative’ says ‘one hundred.’ This agrees with Maxwell of Kirkconnell ‘not above a hundred,’ but the number was continually increasing.

[610] The 'Narrative' states 'one hundred.' This matches what Maxwell of Kirkconnell said, 'not more than a hundred,' but the number kept growing.

[611] Lieut.-colonel of Blakeney’s regiment (27th, now the Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers).

[611] Lieutenant Colonel of Blakeney’s regiment (27th, now the Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers).

[612] Letter xx. p. 392.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter xx. p. 392.

[613] Letters xxi., xxii. pp. 392, 393.

[613] Letters 21, 22, pp. 392, 393.

[614] William Blakeney, an Irishman, born in Co. Limerick 1672; brigadier-general 1741, major-general 1744, and appointed lieut.-governor of Stirling Castle in that year. The office was a sinecure in time of peace. When Cope left Edinburgh for his highland march, Blakeney posted down to Scotland and took command at Stirling Castle on 27th August. When summoned to surrender the Castle to Prince Charles in January, before and again after the battle of Falkirk, he replied that he had always been looked upon as a man of honour and the rebels should find he would die so. His successful defence of Stirling was rewarded by promotion to lieut.-general and the command of Minorca, which he held for ten years. His defence of Minorca in 1756 against an overwhelming French force won the admiration of Europe. For seventy days this old man of eighty-four held out and never went to bed. On capitulation the garrison was allowed to go free. Blakeney received an Irish peerage for his defence of Minorca about the time that Admiral Byng was executed for its abandonment.

[614] William Blakeney, an Irishman, born in Co. Limerick in 1672; became a brigadier-general in 1741, a major-general in 1744, and was appointed lieutenant-governor of Stirling Castle that same year. This position was a formal title during peacetime. When Cope left Edinburgh for his march into the Highlands, Blakeney hurried to Scotland and took command at Stirling Castle on August 27th. When he was ordered to surrender the Castle to Prince Charles in January, both before and after the battle of Falkirk, he responded that he had always been seen as a man of honor and that the rebels would find he would die that way. His successful defense of Stirling earned him a promotion to lieutenant-general and the command of Minorca, which he held for ten years. His defense of Minorca in 1756 against a massive French force garnered admiration throughout Europe. For seventy days, this eighty-four-year-old man held out without ever going to bed. Upon surrender, the garrison was allowed to leave freely. Blakeney was granted an Irish peerage for his defense of Minorca around the same time Admiral Byng was executed for abandoning it.

[615] John Huske, 1692-1761, colonel of the 23rd (Royal Welsh Fusiliers); was second in command at Falkirk, and commanded the second line at Culloden. Major-general 1743; general 1756. He was second in command to Blakeney at Minorca in 1756.

[615] John Huske, 1692-1761, was a colonel in the 23rd (Royal Welsh Fusiliers). He was the second in command at Falkirk and led the second line at Culloden. He became a major-general in 1743 and a general in 1756. In 1756, he served as Blakeney's second in command at Minorca.

Huske’s division on their march consisted of four regiments of infantry of the line, and the Glasgow regiment, with Ligonier’s (late Gardiner’s) and Hamilton’s dragoons (now 13th and 14th Hussars).

Huske’s division on their march included four line infantry regiments, the Glasgow regiment, and Ligonier’s (formerly Gardiner’s) and Hamilton’s dragoons (now the 13th and 14th Hussars).

[616] This is very misleading. Lord George Murray’s scheme was to wait till the Government troops came up, and tempt them over the bridge: when half had crossed he intended to turn and cut them off. Lord Elcho had kept the enemy in sight all the time, and records that the Jacobites retired ‘in such order that the dragoons never offered to attack them’; moreover, before the highlanders ‘had passed the bridge the dragoons, who were in front of the regulars, drew up close by the bridge and very abusive language passed betwixt both sides.’

[616] This is very misleading. Lord George Murray’s plan was to wait for the Government troops to approach and lure them across the bridge. Once half of them had crossed, he intended to turn around and trap them. Lord Elcho kept the enemy in view the entire time and noted that the Jacobites retreated "in such a way that the dragoons never tried to attack them"; furthermore, before the highlanders "had crossed the bridge, the dragoons, who were in front of the regulars, gathered close to the bridge and exchanged very harsh words between both sides."

Even the picturesque touch of the substituted dinner must go. Lord George particularly mentions both in a private letter to his wife and in his historical letter to Hamilton of Bangour that they had dined at Linlithgow, and the journals of the day state that the affair occurred about 4 o’clock. Maxwell of Kirkconnell considers that if the dragoons had been very enterprising they might have cut off Lord George’s rear. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 370; Jac. Mem., p. 79; Chron. Ath. and Tullib., iii. 141; Kirkconnell’s Narrative, p. 98.)

Even the scenic detail of the changed dinner has to go. Lord George specifically mentions this in a private letter to his wife and in his historical letter to Hamilton of Bangour that they dined at Linlithgow, and the contemporary journals report that it happened around 4 o’clock. Maxwell of Kirkconnell thinks that if the dragoons had been more daring, they could have blocked Lord George’s rear. (Elcho, Affairs of Scotland, p. 370; Jac. Mem., p. 79; Chron. Ath. and Tullib., iii. 141; Kirkconnell’s Narrative, p. 98.)

[617] This is meant to be an account of the battle of Falkirk.

[617] This is intended to be a description of the battle of Falkirk.

[618] The Argyllshire highlanders had joined Huske at Falkirk on January 16th, and were present at the battle the following day. Their colonel was John Campbell, younger, of Mamore (1723-1806). In 1745 he was lieut.-colonel of the 54th Regiment, but he commanded the Argyll Highlanders (militia) throughout the Scottish campaign, and was present at Falkirk and Culloden. He succeeded his father (see ante, p. 259) as 5th Duke of Argyll, 1770. He is best known to fame as the husband of the beautiful Elizabeth Gunning, widow of the 6th Duke of Hamilton, and as the host of Dr. Johnson and Boswell at Inverary in 1773.

[618] The Argyllshire highlanders joined Huske at Falkirk on January 16th and were present at the battle the following day. Their colonel was John Campbell, younger, of Mamore (1723-1806). In 1745, he was lieutenant-colonel of the 54th Regiment, but he commanded the Argyll Highlanders (militia) throughout the Scottish campaign and was present at Falkirk and Culloden. He succeeded his father (see ante, p. 259) as the 5th Duke of Argyll in 1770. He is best known for being the husband of the beautiful Elizabeth Gunning, widow of the 6th Duke of Hamilton, and for hosting Dr. Johnson and Boswell at Inverary in 1773.

[619] At Prestonpans (21st September) seventy-seven officers were taken prisoners. Some of these were allowed entire freedom on parole, but a large portion of them had been interned in Perthshire: they were kindly treated, and had given their parole. In December a considerable number had been removed to Glamis Castle, in Forfarshire, and to Cupar, Leslie, Pitfirran, Culross, and St. Andrews in Fife. They were living quietly in these places when about the second week in January their retreats were raided and they ‘were forcibly hurried off by a great number of people in arms and disguised, whom they could not resist, and carried by the same violence to Edinburgh.’ (Scots Mag., viii. 43.) Thirty-one officers arrived at Edinburgh on 19th January, and Grossett was sent next day to recover those mentioned in the text.

[619] At Prestonpans (September 21) seventy-seven officers were taken prisoner. Some were granted complete freedom on parole, but many others were interned in Perthshire. They were treated well and had given their parole. In December, a significant number were moved to Glamis Castle in Forfarshire, as well as to Cupar, Leslie, Pitfirran, Culross, and St. Andrews in Fife. They were living peacefully in these places when, around the second week in January, their hideouts were invaded, and they were forcibly taken away by a large group of armed and disguised individuals whom they couldn't resist, and were violently transported to Edinburgh. (Scots Mag., viii. 43.) Thirty-one officers arrived in Edinburgh on January 19, and Grossett was sent the next day to retrieve those mentioned in the text.

[620] The Duke of Cumberland arrived in Edinburgh on 30th January.

[620] The Duke of Cumberland arrived in Edinburgh on January 30th.

[621] Not identified.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Not found.

[622] Letter xxv. p. 394.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 25. p. 394.

[623] This officer may have been the second major of the 3rd (Scots) Guards, the only regimental officer of the name who held the rank of colonel at this time.

[623] This officer might have been the second major of the 3rd (Scots) Guards, the only regimental officer by that name who held the rank of colonel at that time.

[624] Letter xxviii. p. 395.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 28. p. 395.

[625] Not identified.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Not identified.

[626] Letter xxix. p. 395.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 29. p. 395.

[627] Should be Bligh’s regiment, the 20th, now the Lancashire Fusiliers.

[627] Should be Bligh’s regiment, the 20th, now the Lancashire Fusiliers.

[628] Letter xxx. p. 396.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter xxx. p. 396.

[629] Letter xxxi. p. 396.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 31. p. 396.

[630] William, 8th earl, suc. 1720. In 1745 he was a captain in the 3rd (Scots) Guards: he served on Cope’s staff at Prestonpans; commanded the Glasgow (volunteer or militia) regiment at Falkirk; was also colonel of the Edinburgh regiment. In 1757 he was appointed Governor of Gibraltar, where he died in 1761, being then a lieut.-general.

[630] William, 8th earl, succeeded in 1720. In 1745, he was a captain in the 3rd (Scots) Guards: he served on Cope’s staff at Prestonpans, commanded the Glasgow (volunteer or militia) regiment at Falkirk, and also held the title of colonel of the Edinburgh regiment. In 1757, he was appointed Governor of Gibraltar, where he died in 1761, at that time holding the rank of lieutenant-general.

[631] Letter xxxiii. p. 398.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter 33. p. 398.

[632] This is that Thomas Smith who, in 1728, for an act of consummate audacity acquired vast fame, became for a while the darling of the British nation, and in the Navy received the nickname of ‘Tom of Ten Thousand.’ Although only junior lieut. of H.M.S. Gosport, while in temporary command he forced the French corvette Gironde to lower her topsail as a salute to the British flag when passing out of Plymouth Sound. For this exploit he was summarily dismissed the service on the complaint of the French ambassador, but, according to tradition, was reinstated the following day with the rank of post-captain (see Thackeray’s Roundabout Papers, No. 4, ‘On Some Late Great Victories’). Modern investigation has somewhat qualified the dramatic story of the reinstatement, but not of the initial act. Smith was naval commander-in-chief in Scotland from February 1746 to January 1747 when he became rear-Admiral; in 1757, Admiral of the Blue. He presided at the court-martial which condemned Admiral Byng. He died 1761.

[632] This is the Thomas Smith who, in 1728, became famous for his incredible boldness, for a while being the favorite of the British people, and earned the nickname ‘Tom of Ten Thousand’ in the Navy. Though he was just a junior lieutenant on H.M.S. Gosport, he managed to make the French corvette Gironde lower her topsail as a salute to the British flag while leaving Plymouth Sound during his temporary command. For this act, he was quickly dismissed from service after the French ambassador complained, but according to tradition, he was reinstated the next day with the rank of post-captain (see Thackeray’s Roundabout Papers, No. 4, ‘On Some Late Great Victories’). Recent investigations have somewhat adjusted the dramatic story of his reinstatement but not the initial act. Smith served as the naval commander-in-chief in Scotland from February 1746 to January 1747, when he became rear admiral; in 1757, he became Admiral of the Blue. He presided over the court-martial that condemned Admiral Byng. He died in 1761.

To those interested in Jacobite history his memory should ever be cherished as the benignant guardian, if jailer, of Flora Macdonald. When Flora was first made prisoner in Skye in the second week of July, she was taken on board the ship of the merciless Captain Ferguson (ante, p. 244), in which she was detained for three weeks. Luckily for her, General Campbell was also on board and treated Flora with great kindness. The general handed her over to Commodore Smith, with whom she remained a prisoner until her arrival in London in the middle of November, a period of three and a half months. Home, in his History, says that ‘this most worthy gentleman treated Flora not as a stranger, nor a prisoner, but with the affection of a parent.’ Bishop Forbes tells the same story: he ‘behaved like a father to her, and tendered her many good advices as to her behaviour in her ticklish situation.’ Smith permitted Flora to go ashore in Skye to see her mother. When lying in Leith roads he presented her with a handsome suit of riding clothes and other garments, as well as an outfit for a Highland maid who had hurriedly left Skye to accompany the lady in her captivity.

For those interested in Jacobite history, his memory should always be cherished as the kind protector, if not the jailer, of Flora Macdonald. When Flora was first imprisoned in Skye in the second week of July, she was taken aboard the ship of the ruthless Captain Ferguson (ante, p. 244), where she was held for three weeks. Fortunately for her, General Campbell was also on board and treated Flora with great kindness. The general handed her over to Commodore Smith, with whom she remained a prisoner until her arrival in London in mid-November, which lasted three and a half months. Home, in his History, states that "this most worthy gentleman treated Flora not as a stranger, nor a prisoner, but with the affection of a parent." Bishop Forbes tells the same story: he "behaved like a father to her and gave her many good pieces of advice about her behavior in her tricky situation." Smith allowed Flora to go ashore in Skye to see her mother. While lying in Leith roads, he gifted her a beautiful set of riding clothes and other garments, as well as a set for a Highland maid who had hurriedly left Skye to accompany her in captivity.

[633] Guild Hall Relief Fund. See Appendix.

[633] Guild Hall Relief Fund. See Appendix.

[634] The 8th now The King’s (Royal Liverpool) Regiment.

[634] The 8th King’s (Royal Liverpool) Regiment.

[635] Apparently meaning ‘notify.’

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Seems to mean 'notify.'

[636] Eyemouth.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Eyemouth.

[637] A bylander or bilander is a two-masted ship, rather flat-bottomed, used chiefly in the canals of Holland.

[637] A bylander or bilander is a two-masted ship, fairly flat-bottomed, primarily used in the canals of Holland.

[638] Sic in copy, ‘and vissibly’ is probably a mistake for ‘invisibly.’

[638] As it is in the text, ‘and vissibly’ is likely an error for ‘invisibly.’

[639] Author of Medical Heroes of the ’Forty-five: Glasgow, 1897.

[639] Author of Medical Heroes of the ’Forty-five: Glasgow, 1897.

[640] Barclay acted as justice of the peace for Prince Charles, enlisted men, and collected the excise.

[640] Barclay served as the justice of the peace for Prince Charles, recruited soldiers, and gathered the tax.

[641] Maule was a writer in Stonehaven and procurator-fiscal of Kincardine. He served as an ensign, probably in Lord Ogilvy’s regiment.

[641] Maule was a writer in Stonehaven and the procurator-fiscal of Kincardine. He served as an ensign, likely in Lord Ogilvy’s regiment.

[642] Dr. Lawson seems to have been the father of John Lawson, junior, who served in the Jacobite army.

[642] Dr. Lawson appears to have been the father of John Lawson, Jr., who fought in the Jacobite army.

[643] Keeper of a public-house in Stonehaven.

[643] Owner of a pub in Stonehaven.

[644] The occasion of this Memorial and the circumstances attending its production will be found fully detailed in chap. vi. of The Last of the Royal Stuarts, by Herbert M. Vaughan: London, 1906.

[644] The details of this Memorial and the events surrounding its creation are fully described in chapter vi. of The Last of the Royal Stuarts, by Herbert M. Vaughan: London, 1906.

[645] I am indebted to Miss Nairne, Salisbury, for this translation.

[645] I thank Miss Nairne, Salisbury, for this translation.

[646] These lists make no pretence to completeness. They are extracted from a manuscript Jacobite army list which I have been compiling for many years. In it I have noted down the name of every gentleman properly authenticated that I have come across when studying the history of the period.

[646] These lists don’t claim to be complete. They are taken from a manuscript army list of Jacobites that I've been working on for many years. In it, I've recorded the names of every verified gentleman I've encountered while studying the history of that time.

[647] Clanranald, Boisdale, Glengarry, and Bishop Hugh Macdonald did not rise in arms, but were all imprisoned for being concerned in the Rising.

[647] Clanranald, Boisdale, Glengarry, and Bishop Hugh Macdonald didn't take up arms, but they were all imprisoned for being involved in the Rising.

[648] Interesting information on the raising of Fairburn’s men is given by the French envoy, writing to the French Foreign Minister: Lady Mackintosh, he says, ‘a bien été imitée par une autre fort jolie personne de son âge, nommée Barbe Gourdon, femme de Mekensie de Ferbarn, le plus considérable des vassaux et des parens de milord Seaforth. Celle-cy n’a pas banni son mari; mais, malgré luy, elle a vendu ses diamants et sa vaisselle pour lever des hommes. Elle s’en a ramassé cent ciquante des plus braves du païs, qu’elle a joint à ceux de miladi Seaforth, sous la conduite de son beau-frère.’

[648] The French envoy, writing to the French Foreign Minister, shares some interesting information about the recruitment of Fairburn’s men: Lady Mackintosh, he says, “has been imitated by another quite beautiful woman of her age, named Barbe Gourdon, wife of Mekensie de Ferbarn, the most significant of the vassals and relatives of Lord Seaforth. She hasn't banished her husband; but, despite him, she sold her diamonds and silverware to raise troops. She gathered one hundred and fifty of the bravest men from the area, who joined those of Lady Seaforth, under the command of her brother-in-law.”

This ‘beau-frère’ may mean Kenneth, her husband’s brother, or it may mean Barisdale who was married to her husband’s sister. Young Lentron in the List of Persons concerned in the Rebellion is termed a schoolboy. I find no mention of this Barbara Gordon in the Mackenzie clan history.

This 'brother-in-law' could refer to Kenneth, her husband's brother, or it could mean Barisdale, who was married to her husband's sister. Young Lentron in the List of Persons concerned in the Rebellion is called a schoolboy. I don’t see any mention of this Barbara Gordon in the Mackenzie clan history.

[649] James Gordon, son of the laird of Glasterum, Banffshire. Born 1664; died 1746; consecrated secretly as Bishop of Nicopolis in partibus, 1706; Vicar-apostolic in Scotland, 1718. Lord John Drummond, Clanranald, and possibly Lady Clanranald (née Macleod) were Roman Catholics.

[649] James Gordon, the son of the laird of Glasterum in Banffshire. Born in 1664; died in 1746; secretly consecrated as Bishop of Nicopolis in partibus in 1706; became Vicar-apostolic in Scotland in 1718. Lord John Drummond, Clanranald, and possibly Lady Clanranald (née Macleod) were Roman Catholics.

[650] Frederick of Hesse Cassel was the consort of Ulrica, sister and successor of Charles XII. He was crowned King of Sweden 1720; died 1751. His nephew, Frederick, Prince, afterwards Landgrave, of Hesse, married Princess Anne, daughter of George II., 1740: he brought Hessian troops to Scotland in February 1746.

[650] Frederick of Hesse Cassel was the husband of Ulrica, sister and successor of Charles XII. He became King of Sweden in 1720 and died in 1751. His nephew, Frederick, who later became Landgrave of Hesse, married Princess Anne, daughter of George II., in 1740. He brought Hessian troops to Scotland in February 1746.

[651] Alexander Gordon of Auchintoul (Banffshire). Entered the Russian service 1693; married the daughter of his kinsman, Patrick Gordon of Achleuris, the celebrated General of Peter the Great. Was a colonel at the battle of Narva (1700), where he was captured and detained prisoner until Peter’s victory at Pultowa (1709). Rose to be a Russian major-general. Joined Mar’s Rising, 1715, and was made lieutenant-general (October 1715); commander-in-chief (February 1716) of the Jacobite Army on Mar’s leaving Scotland. Was at Bordeaux, and too ill to join the attempt of 1719. Though living in Banffshire in 1745, he felt too old to go ‘out.’ Died 1752. He wrote a History of Peter the Great, published after his death, in Aberdeen, 1755.

[651] Alexander Gordon of Auchintoul (Banffshire). Joined the Russian army in 1693; married the daughter of his relative, Patrick Gordon of Achleuris, the famous General of Peter the Great. He was a colonel at the battle of Narva (1700), where he was captured and remained a prisoner until Peter's victory at Pultowa (1709). He rose to the rank of major-general in Russia. Joined the Jacobite Rising in 1715 and was made lieutenant-general (October 1715) and commander-in-chief (February 1716) of the Jacobite Army when Mar left Scotland. He was in Bordeaux but was too ill to participate in the attempt of 1719. Although he was living in Banffshire in 1745, he felt too old to take part. He died in 1752. He wrote a History of Peter the Great, published posthumously in Aberdeen in 1755.

[652] Captain Wm. Hay, groom of the bedchamber to the Chevalier.

[652] Captain Wm. Hay, personal attendant to the Chevalier.

[653] Robert (Gordon) but for the attainder Viscount of Kenmure; eldest son of William, 6th Viscount, who was executed for his share in the ’15. He was an ardent Jacobite; he died in 1741, aged about thirty, and was succeeded by his brother John, who joined Prince Charles at Holyrood, accepted the command of a troop of horse, but deserted the following day. See Murray’s Memorials, pp. 53, 227.

[653] Robert (Gordon), but for the attainder Viscount of Kenmure, was the eldest son of William, the 6th Viscount, who was executed for his role in the '15 uprising. He was a passionate Jacobite and died in 1741 at around thirty years old. He was succeeded by his brother John, who joined Prince Charles at Holyrood, took command of a cavalry troop, but deserted the very next day. See Murray’s Memorials, pp. 53, 227.

[654] Not identified; may be Nisbet of Dirleton and Callendar of Craigforth.

[654] Not identified; may be Nisbet of Dirleton and Callendar of Craigforth.

[655] French Minister of Finance.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Finance Minister of France.

[656] Walter Stapleton, lieut.-col. of Berwick’s regiment; commandant of the Irish picquets and brigadier in the French army; wounded at Culloden and died of his wounds.

[656] Walter Stapleton, lieutenant colonel of Berwick’s regiment; in charge of the Irish pickets and brigadier in the French army; wounded at Culloden and died from his injuries.

[657] Henry Ker of Graden, Teviotdale, heir of an ancient family of moss troopers; b. 1702; served in the Spanish army, 1722-38, when he returned to Scotland; was aide-de-camp to Lord George Murray and titular aide-de-camp to the Prince; the best staff officer the Jacobites possessed. Captured in May in the Braes of Angus; tried for his life, and in vain pleaded his Spanish commission; sentenced to death but reprieved; released in 1748; died a lieut.-col. in the Spanish service 1751. (Leishman, A Son of Knox, p. 20.) Ker wrote an account of the operations in the last two months of the campaign, printed in The Lyon, i. 355.

[657] Henry Ker of Graden, Teviotdale, heir to an ancient family of moss troopers; born in 1702; served in the Spanish army from 1722 to 1738, when he returned to Scotland; was aide-de-camp to Lord George Murray and titular aide-de-camp to the Prince; the best staff officer the Jacobites had. Captured in May in the Braes of Angus; tried for his life, and he unsuccessfully pleaded his Spanish commission; sentenced to death but reprieved; released in 1748; died a lieutenant colonel in the Spanish service in 1751. (Leishman, A Son of Knox, p. 20.) Ker wrote a report on the operations during the last two months of the campaign, printed in The Lyon, i. 355.

[658] This statement of Daniel’s is opposed to all reliable evidence, and the note in the Drummond Castle MS. is correct. The desire of his enemies was to throw the blame of the disaster on Lord George Murray. Even the Prince seems to have talked himself into a similar belief (see post, p. 240). The responsibility lay on Prince Charles himself, as is told in the Introduction.

[658] This statement from Daniel contradicts all reliable evidence, and the note in the Drummond Castle manuscript is accurate. His enemies wanted to shift the blame for the disaster onto Lord George Murray. Even the Prince appears to have convinced himself of a similar belief (see post, p. 240). The responsibility fell on Prince Charles himself, as explained in the Introduction.

[659] Keppoch’s brother Donald, killed at Culloden. Donald MacDonell of Tirnadrish (or Tiendrish), a cousin of Keppoch; he was the only Jacobite officer taken prisoner at Falkirk. He was executed at Carlisle in October.

[659] Keppoch’s brother Donald was killed at Culloden. Donald MacDonell of Tirnadrish (or Tiendrish), a cousin of Keppoch, was the only Jacobite officer captured at Falkirk. He was executed in Carlisle in October.

[660] Alexander Mackay of Auchmony, who long afterwards married Angusia, d. of Angus Macdonell, Glengarry’s son, referred to on p. 277.

[660] Alexander Mackay of Auchmony, who later married Angusia, daughter of Angus Macdonell, son of Glengarry, mentioned on p. 277.

[661] The house of Gordon of Glenbucket at Tomintoul in Strathavon.

[661] The house of Gordon of Glenbucket in Tomintoul, Strathavon.

[662] See ante, p. 118.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See "previous," p. 118.

[663] His chamberlain or steward.

His chamberlain or manager.

[664] For the authenticity of this manifesto, see ante, p. 132.

[664] For the authenticity of this manifesto, see ante, p. 132.

[665] Generally ‘Strathdearn,’ the valley of the Findhorn.

[665] Generally 'Strathdearn,' the valley of the Findhorn.

[666] ‘Clan Chattan,’ the Macphersons, Mackintoshes and Farquharsons; probably here meaning the Macphersons.

[666] ‘Clan Chattan,’ the Macphersons, Mackintoshes, and Farquharsons; likely referring to the Macphersons.


[Pg 459]

[Pg 459]

INDEX

  • Abercromby, Francis, of Fetterneir, 164 n.
  • Aberdeen, rebels in, 285-6;
  • presbyterian ministers preach against the rebels, 202;
  • no election of magistrates during the rebellion, 119, 124;
  • requests aid from lord Loudoun, 134;
  • rebels demand £215 of levy money from Old Aberdeen, 135;
  • masters of King’s College taxed, 136;
  • public fast observed, 136;
  • rebels attempt to cause a mutiny among the Macleods, 140;
  • the rebels march to engage the Macleods, 140;
  • skirmish at the fords of Don, 143-4;
  • the rebels collect levy money, 147, 150;
  • the citizens maltreated and plundered by Macgregors, 148;
  • rebels march through the town in their retreat from Stirling, 149;
  • arrival of the duke of Cumberland, 151;
  • Bisset’s sermon on the good behaviour of the rebels, 189 and n;
  • popish and non-jurant meeting houses destroyed, 56;
  • Gordon’s hospital garrisoned by the duke of Cumberland;
  • the duke leaves the town, 159;
  • militia raised and governors appointed, 160;
  • military law paramount, 162;
  • rioting by the soldiers, 163 and n.
  • —— George Gordon, 3rd earl of, 123 and n.
  • Aberdeenshire, the rebellion of 1715, 130;
  • lord Lewis Gordon issues his burning order, 134-5 and n.
  • Abernethy presbytery testify to the loyalty of Mr. John Grant, minister of Abernethy, 317.
  • —— brother of Mayen, 121.
  • Abertarff, 89;
  • the presbytery exonerate rev. John Grant of Urquhart, 316.
  • Aboyne, earl of, 131.
  • Achires. See Ogilvie.
  • Achoynanie. See Grant, Thomas.
  • Adams, Mr., cipher name for the king of France, 63.
  • Agnew, sir Andrew, 206 n.
  • Aird, 89.
  • Airlie, Anne, countess of, 35 n.
  • —— James, earl of, 35 n.
  • —— John, earl of, 35 and n.
  • Albemarle, William, earl of, 163 n, 417.
  • Alisary, South Uist, 250 n.
  • Alloa, operations of rebels at, 353-8.
  • Altimarlach, battle of, between Sinclair of Keiss and Campbell of Glenurchy, 71 n.
  • Amelot de Chaillou, M., 9 and n, 10, 12, 14, 15, 47, 57.
  • Ancrum, William, lord, afterw. marquess of Lothian, his expedition to Curgaff, 152 and n;
  • orders the destruction of houses where arms were found, 161-2 and n, 163;
  • is removed from Aberdeen because of the rioting of the soldiers, 163 n;
  • succeeded by lord Sempill, 164 and n.
  • Anderson, captain, 61 n.
  • Appin, 86.
  • —— laird of. See Stewart, Dugald.
  • Applecross, 75, 77.
  • Arbuthnott, Alexander, of Knox, commissioner of customs, 50 and n, 381, 385.
  • Ardgour, 84.
  • —— laird of. See Maclean.
  • Ardloch, laird of. See Mackenzie.
  • Ardnamurchan, 82-3.
  • Argyllshire Highlanders at the battle of Falkirk, 363 n, 364.
  • Arisaig, 81, 229 and n.
  • Assynt and its proprietors, 73-4 and n.
  • Atholl, William, [Jacobite] duke of, 344 n, 410.
  • Auchengaul. See Crichton.
  • Auchlunkart (Auflunkart), 288, 290.[Pg 460]
  • Auchmeddan. See Baird, William.
  • Auchmony. See Mackay, Alexander.
  • Auldearn, battle of, 76 n.
  • Avachy. See Gordon.
  • Baggot, John, in command of the prince’s Hussars, 150 and n, 185, 202.
  • Baird, William, of Auchmeddan, 128 and n.
  • Baleshare, 243 n.
  • —— laird of. See Macdonald, Hugh.
  • Balhaldy. See Macgregor, William.
  • Balmerino, Arthur, lord, 173 n, 181 and n, 183, 190, 203;
  • his character as given by captain Daniel;
  • the quarrel with lord George Murray, 200;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 410;
  • surrenders after Culloden, 216.
  • Balmoral, laird of. See Farquharson.
  • Balnagowan, lairds of. See Ross.
  • Baltimore, 244-5.
  • Balveny castle, 287 n.
  • Banffshire and the rebellion, 111-164;
  • lord Lewis Gordon issues his burning order, 134-5 and n.
  • Bannerman, sir Alexander, of Elsick, 148 and n, 149.
  • Barra, 79.
  • Barrel’s regiment, 152 n, 153.
  • Barry, Dr., 62.
  • Barrymore, James, 4th earl of, 21 and n, 23, 47.
  • Bartlet, writer in Aberdeen, taken prisoner by the rebels, 137.
  • Battereau’s regiment, 418.
  • Beinn Ruigh Choinnich, 249 n.
  • Belintomb, laird of, 281 n.
  • Benbecula, 230, 231, 237, 252 and n, 253.
  • Ben Nevis, 86.
  • Birkenbush, laird of. See Gordon.
  • Bisset, John, minister in Aberdeen, his sermon on the good behaviour of the Jacobite army in Aberdeen, 189 and n.
  • Black Watch soldiers shot in the Tower for desertion, 42 and n.
  • Blair castle, siege of, 206 and n.
  • Blakeney, William, lieut.-governor of Stirling castle, 358 and n, 385, 418;
  • letter to, from general Hawley, 393.
  • Bland, Humphrey, major-general, enters Aberdeen, 151;
  • at Old Meldrum, 153 and n;
  • marches to Huntly, 154.
  • Blelack. See Gordon, Charles.
  • Bligh’s regiment, 368 and n, 417.
  • Boat o’ Bridge, 289 and n.
  • Bog o’ Gight, 290 and n.
  • Boisdale. See Macdonald, Alex.
  • Bonar, near Creich, 110.
  • Borradale house, 229 and n.
  • Bourbon, the, taken by the English, 151 n.
  • Boyne, Banffshire, 120 and n.
  • Braco. See Duff, William.
  • Braemar, 92.
  • Breadalbane, John, 1st earl of, defeats the Sinclairs at Altimarlach, 71 n.
  • Brett, colonel, secretary to the duchess of Buckingham, 11 and n.
  • Bright, Mr., cipher name of the earl of Traquair, q.v.
  • Brodie, Alex., of Brodie, writes to Ludovick Grant, upbraiding him for not joining Cope, 272 and n, 274.
  • Brown, captain, of Lally’s regiment, escapes from Carlisle, 192 and n.
  • —— J., cipher name of Murray of Broughton, q.v.
  • Bruce, Robert, minister of Edinburgh, 90 and n.
  • Brucehill. See Forbes.
  • Buchan of Achmacoy, 124.
  • Buckingham, Katherine, duchess of, 10 and n, 16, 21, 23.
  • Burke, Edmund, 227, 229 n, 231 n, 234 n.
  • Burnet, Mr., cipher name of prince Charles. See Stuart.
  • —— of Kemnay, 124, 132, 147, 162.
  • Burnett, sir Alex., of Leys, 124.
  • Butler, Mr., 47, 48, 57.
  • Caithness and the Jacobite rising, 71-2 and n.
  • —— George Sinclair, earl of, defeated by Campbell of Glenurchy at Altimarlach, 71 n.
  • Callendar, of Craigforth, 33 n.
  • Cameron, Alexander, killed by Grant of Knockando, 103 n.
  • —— —— S. J., brother of Lochiel, 87 and n.
  • —— Dr. Archibald, 97 n, 217, 219.
  • —— Donald, of Glenpean, 229.
  • —— —— of Lochiel, 5 and n, 15 n, 17, 24-8 n, 34, 36, 38, 41, 44-6, 48, 58, 65-7;
  • his interview with Murray of Broughton in Edinburgh, 16;
  • opposes the conversion of his people to Romanism, 87;[Pg 461]
  • sends prince Charles’s Declaration to Forbes of Culloden, 95;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 413;
  • at Culloden, 416.
  • Cameron, Ludovick, of Torcastle, 84 and n.
  • —— Margaret, sister of Lochiel, 82 n.
  • Cameronian covenanters, 43 and n.
  • Camerons, 87;
  • at the battle of Prestonpans, 407;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409, 411;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • —— of Morven, 84.
  • Campbell, lieut., of the Edinburgh regiment, 364.
  • —— of Inverawe, attempts to capture the duke of Perth, 118 n.
  • —— Alexander, lieut., taken prisoner at Keith by the rebels, 155.
  • —— —— minister of Inverary, 85.
  • —— Co., commissioner of customs, 381, 385.
  • —— Donald, befriends the prince in Harris, 233 and n, 235.
  • —— sir Donald, of Ardnamurchan, 83 and n.
  • —— Dugald, of Achacrossan, 244 n.
  • —— Duncan, 260.
  • —— sir Duncan, of Lochnell, 83.
  • —— sir James, of Auchenbreck, 6 and n, 14 n, 16, 26, 45 n, 48, 52, 58.
  • —— John, of Mamore [aftw. duke of Argyll], 259 and n, 373 n.
  • —— —— yr. of Mamore, col. of the Argyllshire Highlanders, 363 and n, 364 , 373 n, 410.
  • —— sir John, of Glenurchy, aftw. earl of Breadalbane, q.v.
  • —— Primrose, wife of lord Lovat, 44 n.
  • Campbells of Argyll at Culloden, 418.
  • Campo Florido, Spanish ambassador at Paris, 22 n.
  • Carberry hill, 405, 408.
  • Carlisle, surrender of, 118 n;
  • occupied by the rebels, 173 n;
  • the siege, 182 n, 192-3;
  • Jacobite prisoners, 187 and n.
  • Carlyle, Alex., his Autobiography, 44 n.
  • Carnusy. See Gordon.
  • Carron water, 351, 384.
  • Carse’s Nook, 348-9, 383.
  • Castle Forbes, 154.
  • Castle Fraser (Muchals), Aberdeenshire, 98 n.
  • Castlelaw, Mr., collector of customs at Dunbar, 371.
  • Castle Leod, Strathpeffer, 78 n.
  • Cecil, William, Jacobite agent in England, 11 and n, 15, 16 n, 21, 23, 28.
  • Chalmers, George, principal of King’s College, Aberdeen, 138;
  • taken prisoner by the rebels, 145.
  • Charité, the, taken by the English, 151 n.
  • Chisholm, Roderick, of Comar, 90.
  • —— —— of Strathglass, 90, 99 and n.
  • —— —— og, killed at Culloden, 100 n.
  • —— William, son of Strathglass, physician in, and provost of Inverness, 100 n.
  • Chisholms join the rebels, 99.
  • Cholmondeley’s regiment, 411, 417.
  • Church of Scotland clergy loyal to the government, 124-5;
  • threatened by the rebels, 149;
  • ridiculed by the soldiers, 162.
  • Clate, kirktown of, 153-4.
  • Clephan, captain, 61 n.
  • Clesterton, laird of. See Fea, James.
  • Clifton, skirmish at, 185-6 and n.
  • Cobham’s dragoons, 410, 418.
  • Cochrane, captain, prisoner with the rebels, 364.
  • —— Dr., of Roughfoil, 51 n.
  • —— Alex., of Barbachlaw, 51 n.
  • Cockburn, Adam, hosier, 62 and n.
  • Cogach and the Macleods, 74-5, 96.
  • Colyear’s regiment, 61 and n.
  • Commissioners of customs, letter to, from Walter Grossett, 383;
  • letter from, to Grossett, 385.
  • Congleton, 175.
  • Cope, sir John, 95, 103, 273;
  • his march to the north, 270 and n;
  • in Inverness, 271 n;
  • in Aberdeen, 114 and n, 115;
  • removes the town’s arms, 117;
  • at Dunbar, 341, 405;
  • position of his troops at Prestonpans, 405-6;
  • defeated, 408;
  • succeeded by Hawley, 409.
  • Coren, captain, 365 and n;
  • letter to, from the lord justice-clerk, 394.
  • Corn sent from the north of England to the rebels in Lochaber, 370, 396-7.[Pg 462]
  • Corradale, South Uist, 238 and n, 239 and n, 246.
  • Craigie, Robert, of Glendoick, lord advocate, aftw. lord president, 269 and n;
  • letter from, to Walter Grossett, 379.
  • Crawford, major, 155.
  • —— John, earl of, 26 and n, 42 n.
  • Creich, 110.
  • Crichton of Auchengaul, joins lord Lewis Gordon, 130.
  • Crofts, lieut., taken prisoner at Falkirk, 158 and n.
  • Cromar, 92.
  • Cromarty, George, 1st earl of, 74 and n, 78 n.
  • —— George, 3rd earl, 75, 91, 109, 410, 415;
  • joins the rising, 95-97 and n;
  • claims to be chief of the Mackenzies, 100.
  • Crosby, captain, 159.
  • Culcairn, now Kincraig, 103 n.
  • —— laird of. See Munro, George.
  • Cullen, 205-7, 290.
  • —— house plundered by the rebels, 157 and n, 208.
  • Culloden, estimate of Jacobite forces, 178 n;
  • the rebels’ useless night march, 210-11 and n;
  • lord George Murray in favour of making a stand at Culloden, 212-213 and n;
  • prince Charles persuaded by lord George Murray to give the place of honour to the Athole men, 239;
  • the prince adverse to giving battle, 240;
  • account of the battle, 414-19;
  • Daniel’s account of the battle, 213-15.
  • —— house attacked by Frasers, 106.
  • Culraik, 415-16.
  • Cumberland, William, duke of, 187 and n;
  • takes Carlisle, 192-3 and n;
  • in Edinburgh, 299 n, 365 and n;
  • in Stirling, 365;
  • at Perth, 303 n, 305 n, 367;
  • in Aberdeen, 151, 307 and n;
  • orders the destruction of nonjurant meeting places, 156;
  • withdraws his protection from the houses of Park and Durn, on account of the rebels pillaging Cullen house, 157;
  • leaves Aberdeen, 159 and n, 208 and n;
  • at Nairn, 414;
  • at Culloden, 99 n;
  • disposition of his forces, 417;
  • the battle, 213-15, 414-19.
  • Cuming, of Kinninmonth, 121.
  • Cuming, yr. of Pitully, 121.
  • Cupbairdy. See Gordon.
  • Curgaff, 152.
  • Cuthbert, of Castlehill, 140 n.
  • —— major, brother of Castlehill, 140 and n, 143.
  • Dan, Mr., cipher name of Donald Cameron, of Lochiel, q.v.
  • Daniel, captain John, his Account of his Progress with Prince Charles, 165-224;
  • joins the Jacobite army in Lancashire, 168;
  • endeavours to obtain followers for the prince, 169;
  • gets the better of a quaker, 169-70;
  • obtains a captain’s commission, 171;
  • joins Elcho’s guards, 173;
  • billeted in Derby, 176;
  • meets the duke of Perth, 181;
  • his horse stolen by the Jacobite soldiers;
  • deserted by his servant, 182;
  • helps himself to a horse, 183;
  • his intimacy with Balmerino, 183, 190-200, 203;
  • rescues two women at the crossing of the Esk, 188;
  • on the good behaviour of the army in England, 189;
  • marches north to Aberdeen, 202;
  • loses his company in a snowstorm, 203;
  • revives himself and horse with whisky, 203-4;
  • rejoins the army at Old Meldrum, 204;
  • receives from the prince a standard taken at Falkirk, 205;
  • his testimony to the influence of Forbes of Culloden, 207;
  • holds lord George Murray to be responsible for Culloden, 212;
  • his description of the battle, 213-15;
  • leaves the field with lord John Drummond, 215;
  • his wanderings after Culloden, 216-17;
  • his description of the naval fight between the English and French, 220;
  • sails for France, 223.
  • Danish forts in Glenelg, 80.
  • Derby, 175-6.
  • Deskford, lord, 275 and n, 276 , 283 , 294 and n, 298 n.
  • Dickson, John, of Hartree, 52 n.
  • —— William, lieut. in Wolfe’s regiment, 399.
  • Dingwall, merchant in Aberdeen, taken prisoner by the rebels, 137.
  • Dougall, George, of the Janet, 398.
  • Dounan church, 113 n.[Pg 463]
  • Drimnin, laird of. See Maclean, Charles.
  • Drumelzier, 19 n.
  • —— laird of. See Hay, Alexander.
  • Drummond, lord George, 208-9.
  • —— captain John, 66 and n.
  • —— lord John, 16, 17 n, 20, 49, 159, 194, 291, 354;
  • lands with troops in Scotland, 132 and n, 178 and n, 345;
  • one of his transports taken, 352 and n;
  • his Declaration, 132, 292 n;
  • letter to, from earl Marischal commanding his friends to join lord John Drummond, 132, 292 n;
  • the authenticity of the letter, 132-3;
  • proposes to hang a few of the clergy of the church of Scotland, 149;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409-10, 413;
  • at Culloden, 215, 415-17;
  • letter from, to Moir of Lonmay, 293 n.
  • —— lord Lewis, 132 and n.
  • —— William, of Balhaldy. See Macgregor.
  • Duff, of Premnay, 124.
  • —— William, of Braco, 113 and n, 114, 123 and n.
  • Dumfries, rebel army in, 190 and n.
  • Dunbar, lady, of Durn, 157.
  • —— James, [Jacobite] earl of, 331 n.
  • —— sir William, of Durn, 121.
  • —— —— of Hemprigs, 72.
  • Dunbars of Caithness, 72 and n.
  • Dunbennan, 118 n.
  • Dundas, captain, prisoner with the rebels, 364.
  • —— Robert, of Arniston, lord president of the court of session, 50 and n.
  • Dundonald, Thomas Cochrane, earl of, 18 and n.
  • Duntulm castle, 262 n.
  • Durn. See Dunbar, sir William.
  • Durness parish, 73.
  • Dutch troops land at Berwick and the Tyne, 184 n.
  • Eccleston, 169.
  • Edgar, David, of Keithock, 3 n.
  • —— James, secretary to the Chevalier de St. George, 32 n, 34-5;
  • letters from, to Murray of Broughton, 3 and n, 18-19, 30;
  • letters to, from Murray of Broughton, 20 and n-27, 37-41, 45 and n.
  • Edinburgh, the provost declines to defend the town, 341;
  • in possession of the rebels, 342;
  • garrisoned by English troops, 345 and n, 351;
  • cannon for the city walls, 352;
  • crowded with Jacobite prisoners, 352 and n.
  • Edinburgh regiment, 372 n.
  • Edwards, J., cipher name of the Chevalier. See Stuart.
  • Eguilles, marquis d’, 100 n, 101 n, 223 n.
  • Elcho, David Wemyss, lord, 43 and n, 61, 173 n, 361 and n, 410.
  • Elgin, magistrates request the laird of Grant to march to their assistance, 297 n;
  • Grant’s letter explaining why he is unable to come, 296 n.
  • Ellis, Mr., cipher name of the Chevalier. See Stuart.
  • Ellon, 158.
  • Elphingstone, 355-7, 384.
  • —- colonel. See Balmerino, lord.
  • Elsick. See Bannerman, sir Alexander.
  • Enzie, Banffshire, 92, 120 and n.
  • Errol, James, earl of, 121 n.
  • —— Mary, countess of, 121 and n.
  • Erskine, Anne. See Airlie, countess of.
  • —— James, lord Grange, 45 n, 90 n.
  • Fachfield. See Thomson.
  • Falconer, Alexander, 121 n.
  • —— (Fawkener), sir Everard, secretary to the duke of Cumberland, 306 and n, 335 and n;
  • report by, on the services of Walter Grossett, 400-2.
  • Falkirk, battle of, 194-8, 228 n, 278 n, 362-3, 409-13.
  • Fall, Mr., magistrate in Dunbar, 371.
  • Farquharson, of Balmoral, 118 and n.
  • —— Anne, wife of Æneas Mackintosh of Mackintosh. See Mackintosh.
  • —— James, of Invercauld, 101 n, 117-18, 131.
  • —— —— of Monaltrie, 117 n-18.
  • Farquharsons, 277;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • Fea, James, of Clesterton, Jacobite leader in Orkney, 71 n.
  • Fergus, Mr., cipher name of the duke of Perth, q.v.
  • Ferguson, John, captain of the Furness, 87 n, 90 n, 228 n, 230 n, 244 and n, 248 n, 373 n.
  • Ferrindonall, 90.[Pg 464]
  • Fielding, Henry, 173 n.
  • Findlater, James Ogilvie, earl of, 123 and n, 286, 307;
  • his house of Cullen plundered by rebels, 157, 208;
  • letter to, from his chamberlain, on the recruiting demands of lord Lewis Gordon, 287 n;
  • appoints Grant sheriff-depute of Banffshire, 289 n.
  • Fisher, Mr., cipher name of prince Charles. See Stuart.
  • Fitzjames, the comte de, taken prisoner by the English, 151 n.
  • Fitzjames’s regiment, 151 and n, 152 and n, 178 n, 206, 227, 417.
  • Fleming’s regiment, 161-3 n, 417.
  • Fletcher, Andrew, lord justice-clerk, 50 and n, 340-1, 344-5 and n, 346-7, 349, 352-3, 358-9, 362-9, 370-1, 373-6;
  • issues warrant for the apprehension of the duke of Perth, 393;
  • letter from, to the commissioners of customs, 381;
  • letter from, to captain Coren, 394;
  • letters from, to Grossett, 385, 390, 392-6, 399;
  • letter to, from Grossett, 397.
  • Fleury, André Hercule de, cardinal, 4 and n, 14 n;
  • his death, 8, 9, 11, 12 and n, 21-3, 57.
  • Foothy (Foot O’ Dee), 115 and n.
  • Fochabers, 155, 207, 288.
  • Forbes of Blackford, 124.
  • —— of Brucehill, 121.
  • —— of Echt, 138;
  • taken prisoner by the rebels, 145.
  • —— of Inverernan, 114.
  • —— of New, 114.
  • —— of Scheves, 124, 138.
  • —— Alexander, lord Forbes of Pitsligo, 119 and n, 122, 151 n, 410.
  • —— sir Arthur, 124.
  • —— Duncan, of Culloden, 99 n, 104, 107 n, 109, 205, 227 n, 270, 280 and n, 283;
  • attempts to dissuade Lochiel from joining the rebellion, 95 and n;
  • his offer of only one company to the Grants resented, 275;
  • his explanation satisfactory, 276;
  • described by captain Daniel, 206-7 and n.
  • —— George, of Skeleter, 113 and n, 152, 307.
  • —— James, lord, 123 and n.
  • —— Robert, printer, son of Forbes of New, 114 n.
  • Formartine, 124 and n, 131.
  • Fort Augustus, 206;
  • siege of, 182 n;
  • taken by the rebels, 313.
  • Fort George, taken by the rebels, 306 n.
  • Fortrose, Kenneth, lord, 75, 77, 91, 104 and n-5, 110, 205.
  • Fort William, siege of, 183 n.
  • Fouay. See Fuyia.
  • Foudline hill, 154.
  • Fowke, Thomas, brigadier-general, 340 and n, 341.
  • Fraser, brother to Inverallochy, 121.
  • —— Archibald Campbell, son of lord Lovat, 44 and n.
  • —— Charles, 4th lord, 98 n.
  • —— —— of Castle Fraser, 98 n.
  • —— —— of Inverallochy, 98 and n, 99 n.
  • —— James, of Foyers, 99 and n.
  • —— Simon. See Lovat, lord.
  • —— —— master of Lovat, 98 and n, 281 n, 282, 320-1.
  • —— Thomas, moderator of Abertarf presbytery, 316.
  • —— —— of Gortuleg, entertains prince Charles, 228 and n.
  • —— William, of Inverallochy, 98 n.
  • Frasers of Aird, 76 n.
  • —— of Lovat, at the battle of Falkirk, 409;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • Frederick, king of Sweden, 22 n.
  • —— landgrave of Hesse, 22 n.
  • Freebairn, Robert, bishop of Edinburgh, 18 and n.
  • Fuyia, 245 and n, 253.
  • Garden, of Troup, 124.
  • Gardiner, colonel, 340.
  • Garrioch, 131.
  • Garstang, 168-9.
  • Garviemore, 216.
  • Geanies, 107 n.
  • —— lairds of. See Macleod.
  • Geohagan. See Gorogan.
  • Gibson, Herbert Mends, attorney, 166.
  • Gilchrist, James, minister at Thurso, 72 and n.
  • Glascoe, major Nicolas, 155 n, 208.
  • Glasgow, fined by the rebels, 191 and n.
  • —— regiment, 345 n, 350 and n, 351, 359 n;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 372 n, 411, 413.
  • Glasterum. See Gordon.
  • Glenbucket, garrisoned, 161.
  • —— estate, 116.
  • —— laird of. See Gordon, John.[Pg 465]
  • Glencoe, 86.
  • —— laird of. See Macdonald, Alexander.
  • Glenelg, 80.
  • Glengarry people are papists and notorious thieves, 88.
  • —— laird of. See Macdonald.
  • Glenkindy, laird of. See Leith.
  • Glenlivat, 91, 92, 274.
  • Glenmoriston, 89.
  • —— lairds of. See Grant.
  • Glennevis, 86.
  • Glen Quoich (Glenkuaak), 240.
  • Glenshiel or Muick, 76 and n, 77.
  • Gordon, major, 140.
  • —— of Aberlour, 136.
  • —— yr. of Ardoch, 107.
  • —— of Ardvach, 145.
  • —— of Avochy, 114, 128, 130, 136, 141, 143, 287.
  • —— of Birkenbush, 144, 288 n.
  • —— of Carnusy, 121.
  • —— of Cupbairdy, 121.
  • —— Mrs., of Cupbairdy, 157 and n.
  • —— of Glasterum, 121.
  • —— of Hallhead, 121.
  • —— of Mill of Kincardine, 121.
  • —— yr. of Logie, 121.
  • —— lady, of Park, 157.
  • —— Alexander, minister of Kintore, 141.
  • —— —— of Auchintoul, 25 and n.
  • —— lady Anne, 123 n.
  • —— Barbara, wife of Mackenzie of Fairburn, 100 n.
  • —— Catherine, duchess of, 209 and n.
  • —— Charles, of Blelack, 118, 129.
  • —— Christiana, wife of Gordon of Glenbucket, 113 n.
  • —— Cosmo, duke of, 86-7, 92, 123, 128 n, 131, 274 n, 284 n.
  • —— Henrietta, duchess of, 128 and n, 342.
  • —— Isabella, wife of George, earl of Cromartie, 95 n.
  • —— James, roman catholic bishop, 17 n.
  • —— John, of Glenbucket, 25 n, 103-4, 113 and n-116, 149, 152, 161, 274 and n, 307, 410.
  • —— lord Lewis, 92, 150;
  • joins the rebels, 102, 127 and n-128;
  • lord lieut. of Aberdeenshire, 128;
  • obtains recruits by threats, 129;
  • interview with lord John Drummond, 132;
  • issues his burning order, 134-5 and n;
  • at the battle of Inverury, 107, 140, 143-6, 178 and n;
  • letter from, to the laird of Grant on recruiting for prince Charles, 283-4;
  • his arbitrary conduct and insolence, 148;
  • letter from, to Grant of Achoynanie, making a demand for men with accoutrements, 287 n;
  • letter from, to Grant, demanding to know what his intentions are, 291 n;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 410.
  • —— Mirabel de, 182 n, 192 and n.
  • —— Patrick, of Achleuris, 25 n.
  • —— Theodore, moderator, 152.
  • —— Thomas, professor in King’s College, Aberdeen, 138.
  • —— sir Thomas, of Earlston, 43 and n.
  • —— sir William, of Invergordon, 95 n.
  • —— —— of Park, 121.
  • —— castle, 205, 290 n.
  • Gorogan, or Geohagan, captain, 171 and n.
  • Gortuleg, laird of. See Fraser, Thomas.
  • Grant, governor of Fort George, 273-4.
  • —— lieut., a prisoner with the rebels, 299 n.
  • —— Mrs., of Ballindalloch, 274.
  • —— of Daldeagan, 324.
  • —— of Glenmoriston, 322.
  • —— of Knockando, 103 n.
  • —— of Rothiemurchus, 276 n, 280 n.
  • —— Alex., of Corriemony, 299 n.
  • —— —— of Sheuglie, 279 n;
  • denies having had any correspondence with the Pretender’s son, 323;
  • induces Grants of Glenmoriston to surrender, 324;
  • treacherously made prisoner at Inverness, 315, 325, 328;
  • admits that some of his children joined the Pretender against his advice;
  • dies a prisoner, 326 n;
  • his petition to the duke of Newcastle, 329 and n.
  • —— —— of Tochineal, Findlater’s chamberlain, 289 n;
  • letter from, to lord Findlater on the demands on the estate by lord Lewis Gordon, 287.
  • —— Allan, of Innerwick, 89 n.
  • —— sir Archibald, of Monymusk, 124, 138 and n.
  • —— George, of Culbin, governor of Inverness castle, 108 n, 109.[Pg 466]
  • —— James, of Dell, 283.
  • —— —— of Sheugly, 315, 323;
  • after assisting Grant of Grant in obtaining surrenders he is made prisoner by his orders, 325-30;
  • examination of, in London, 326;
  • denies any participation in the rising, 327-8;
  • his petition to the duke of Newcastle, 329;
  • to be admitted to bail and tried in Edinburgh, 331.
  • —— —— chamberlain of Strathspey, 299 and n, 302 and n.
  • —— sir James, of Grant, 108 n, 269, 306.
  • —— colonel James Alexander, master of ordnance to prince Charles, 182 and n, 206.
  • —— Jean, wife of Forbes of Skeleter, 113 n.
  • —— John, chamberlain of Urquhart, 299 n, 319, 323;
  • threatening letter to, from Angus Macdonald, ordering him to send men to join the rebel standard, 278;
  • letter to, from Grant of Grant, requiring the gentlemen of Urquhart to remain peaceably at home, 278 n;
  • writes to Grant giving an account of his difficult position, 278 n;
  • letters from, to Grant, on the threat of the Macdonalds and on the refusal of the Urquhart men to join the rebels, 281 n, 282.
  • —— —— minister at Urquhart, hardships endured because of his loyalty, 313, 318;
  • his house attacked by Macdonalds;
  • mobbed for praying for king George, 314;
  • persecuted by the laird of Grant, 315-16, 330;
  • imprisoned in Inverness, 316, 328;
  • exonerated by Abertarf presbytery, 316;
  • removed to London, 317;
  • Abernethy presbytery bear witness to his loyalty, 317;
  • examined in London, 319;
  • declares that the laird of Grant had no objection to some of his clan joining the rebels;
  • refuses offer of chaplaincy to the rebels, 320;
  • his life threatened, 321;
  • denies having ever aided the rebels, 322;
  • his petition to the duke of Newcastle, 329.
  • —— Ludovick, of Grant, 91-2, 153-4;
  • receives intelligence of the rising of the clans, 269-70;
  • informs Cope of his efforts against the rebels, 270-1;
  • sends men to guide Cope through the passes, 272;
  • Brodie of Brodie sends him a letter of remonstrance for not assisting Cope, 272 and n, 274;
  • his conditional offer to help Cope;
  • sends men to drive Glenbucket from Strathaven, 274;
  • interview with Forbes of Culloden, 274-5;
  • accepts the lord president’s offer of a company, 275-6;
  • writes to the gentlemen of Urquhart, ordering them to remain peaceably at home, 278 n;
  • the chamberlain of Urquhart gives him an account of his difficult position, 279;
  • letter of instructions to the chamberlain, 279 n;
  • requested by the lord president to hold his men in readiness;
  • informs Loudoun of his anxiety to do all in his power for the king’s service, 280 and n;
  • letters to, from his chamberlain on the Macdonalds threatening to ravage the country in case of men not joining the rebels, 281 and n;
  • his tenants in Urquhart refuse to join the rebels, 281 n, 282;
  • marches with 600 men for Inverness, 282;
  • dismisses them on learning that no preparations had been made, 283;
  • letter to, from lord Lewis Gordon, asking permission to recruit among his people for prince Charles, 283 n;
  • frustrates lord Lewis’s schemes for raising men, 284;
  • appointed sheriff-depute of Banffshire, 289 n;
  • sends men to secure the Boat o’ Bridge, 289;
  • assists Macleod at Cullen, 291;
  • lord Lewis Gordon writes demanding to know what his intentions are, 291;
  • his reply, 292-3 and n;
  • marches to Strathbogie, and issues his Declaration as to men forced to join the rebels, 293 and n;
  • Loudoun and Deskford suggest that as he had no orders for such an expedition, he should return to Strathspey, 294 and n;
  • garrisons his house of Mulben, 295, 297 n;
  • letter to Elgin magistrates explaining why he cannot march to their assistance, 296 n, 297;
  • letters to, from sir Harry Innes, on the need for protecting Elgin, 298 n;
  • writes to lord Loudoun expressing his desire to do everything possible for the service of the government, 299 n, 300;[Pg 467]
  • Loudoun’s reply, 301 and n;
  • on learning of the arrival of the rebels at Blair he again calls out his men, 301-2 and n;
  • watches the movements of the rebels, and renews request for arms, 304-5 n;
  • Loudoun is unable to comply, 305 n;
  • reproached by Murray of Broughton for aiding the rebels, 306;
  • joins the duke of Cumberland in Aberdeen, 307;
  • forms an advance guard to Strathspey, 308;
  • returns to Castle Grant;
  • his persecution of John Grant, minister of Urquhart, 315;
  • said to be playing double, 319-20, 327;
  • might have been of great service to the government if so disposed, 322, 328;
  • after Culloden he obtains the surrender of the Grants of Glenmoriston and Urquhart, 324;
  • his treachery towards the Grants of Sheugly, 325, 330-2;
  • his possible indiscretions the result of zeal for the weal of the country, 309.
  • —— Patrick, moderator of Abernethy presbytery, 319.
  • —— Robert, adjutant in Loudoun’s regiment, 271.
  • —— —— son of Easter Duthill, 276.
  • —— Thomas, of Achoynanie, 286 and n;
  • letter to, from lord Lewis Gordon, demanding able-bodied men for the rebels, 287 n.
  • —— William, yr. of Dellachapple, 276 n.
  • Grants surrender at Inverness, 322, 324, 328.
  • —— of Glenmoriston, 89 and n;
  • at Prestonpans, 407.
  • Grossett, Alexander, captain in Price’s regiment, killed at Culloden, 336 and n, 343, 401.
  • —— Walter, of Logie, collector of customs at Alloa, his narrative of services performed, with an account of money disposed in the service of the government during the rebellion, 333-76;
  • letters and orders from his correspondence, 377-99;
  • rebels plunder his house in Alloa, and drive off his cattle, 375-6, 402;
  • his narrative certified by the lord justice-clerk, etc., 375-6;
  • letter of instructions to masters of transports;
  • list of transports, 398;
  • report on his services by sir Everard Falconer and John Sharpe, solicitor to the treasury, 400-2;
  • letter from, to the commissioners of customs, 383;
  • letter from, to the lord justice-clerk, 397;
  • letter to, from the commissioners of customs, 381;
  • letter to, from Robert Craigie, advocate general, 379;
  • letter to, from lieut.-general Handasyde, 379-80;
  • letter to, from captain Knight of the Happy Janet, 387;
  • letters to, from the lord justice-clerk, 385, 390, 392-3, 394-6, 399;
  • letters to, from general Guest, 383, 386, 388-9, 391;
  • letters to, from the earl of Home, 388, 391, 398.
  • Guest, Joshua, commander-in-chief in Scotland, 51 and n, 340, 345 n, 347-9, 352, 376;
  • letter from, to the commissioners of customs, 381;
  • letters from, to Walter Grossett, 383, 385-6, 388-9, 391;
  • letter from, to captain Knight of the Happy Janet, 389.
  • Halket, colonel, a prisoner with the rebels, 364.
  • —— John, schoolmaster in Prestonpans, 44 n.
  • Hallhead. See Gordon.
  • Halyburton, John, 132-3 and n.
  • Hamilton, bailie, in Kinghorn, 399.
  • —— duke of, 56.
  • —— governor of Carlisle, 193.
  • —— John, factor to the duke of Gordon, his insolent conduct in Aberdeen, 118-19 and n.
  • Handasyde, lieut.-general Roger, 343, 345 and n, 346, 376;
  • letters from, to Walter Grossett, 379, 380.
  • Hanway, captain, of the Milford, captures the Louis XV. transport, 352 and n.
  • Harper, William, of Edinburgh, 11 n.
  • Harris, island of, 78.
  • Harrison, William, catholic priest, 221 and n.
  • Hartree, Peeblesshire, 52 and n.
  • Hawley, general Henry C., 99 n, 345 n, 353 and n, 358, 361-6, 394-5;
  • succeeds Cope, 409;
  • defeated at Falkirk, 194-6, 410-13;
  • letter from, to general Blakeney, 393.[Pg 468]
  • Hay, yr. of Ranas, 121.
  • —— Alexander, of Drumelzier, 19 and n, 26.
  • —— John, of Restalrig, W.S., 49 n, 219, 223 and n.
  • —— Thomas, of Huntington, keeper of the signet, 49 and n.
  • —— William, brother of Drumelzier, 19 and n, 26.
  • —— —— captain, 25 n.
  • Henry, Mr., 368 and n.
  • Hessians, 184 and n, 206;
  • land at Leith, 305 n, 366, 395.
  • Higgins Nook, near Alloa, 383-4, 348-9, 354, 387, 389, 394.
  • Highland soldiers shot in the Tower for desertion, 42 and n.
  • Highlands, their deplorable condition previous to the rising, 38.
  • Home, John, author of Douglas, 198 n.
  • —— William, earl of, 345 n, 350 n, 351, 372 and n, 376;
  • letters from, to Grossett, 388, 391, 398.
  • Honeywood, general, defeated by the rebels at Clifton, 185-6 and n.
  • Horn, of Westhall, 124, 132, 139, 146.
  • How, captain Thomas, of the Baltimore, 236.
  • Howard’s regiment, 418.
  • ‘Humlys,’ 145 and n.
  • Hunter, of Polmood, death of, 51 and n.
  • —— Robert, of Burnside, 155 and n.
  • Huntly Lodge [formerly Sanstoun], 118 n.
  • Huske, John, major-general, 353-4, 359 and n, 361;
  • at Culloden, 417;
  • letter from, to Walter Grossett, 392.
  • Inglis, sir John, of Cramond, 50 and n.
  • Innes, sir Harry, of Innes, 290 and n, 295;
  • letter to Grant on the need for protecting Elgin, 298 n.
  • Inverallochy, 98 n, 99 n.
  • —— lairds of. See Fraser.
  • Inverernan, laird of. See Forbes.
  • Invergarry castle, 228.
  • Inverlaidnan, 305 and n.
  • Inverness pays indemnity to Keppoch, 88;
  • taken by the rebels, 306 and n.
  • —— castle, 105 n, 108;
  • besieged and taken by the rebels, 109.
  • Invershin pass, 110.
  • Inverurie, skirmish at, 142-6, 295, 298 n.
  • Irving, of Drum, 122.
  • James Francis Stuart. See Stuart.
  • Johnshaven, 115 and n.
  • Keith, 207-8, 287-8;
  • rebels surprise a party of Campbells at, 155-6.
  • —— George. See Marischal, earl.
  • —— James, field-marshal, 7 and n, 26, 31, 36.
  • —— Robert, bishop of Caithness and the Isles, 17 n, 20 and n, 39.
  • Kelly’s regiment, 149 and n.
  • Kendal, 184-5.
  • Kenmure, John, viscount, 25 n, 43, 52.
  • —— Robert, viscount, 25 n.
  • —— William, viscount, 25 n.
  • Ker, Henry, of Graden, 405;
  • at the battle of Culloden, 213 n.
  • —— lord Mark, killed at Culloden, 152 n, 161.
  • —— lord Robert, killed at Culloden, 336 n.
  • Kessock ferry, 108 and n.
  • Kilmarnock, earl of, at the battle of Culloden, 214.
  • Kilmarnock’s Horse, 151 n.
  • Kincraig. See Culcairn.
  • Kingairloch, 84-5.
  • Kingsburgh. See Macdonald, Alexander.
  • Kinloch Moidart, laird of. See Macdonald, Donald.
  • Kintail parish, 76 and n.
  • Kintore, John Keith, earl of, 120, 123 and n, 145-6.
  • Knight, John, captain of the Happy Janet, letter from, to Grossett, 387;
  • letter to, from general Guest, 389.
  • Knoydart people ‘all papists and mostly thieves,’ 81.
  • Larrey, captain, 171.
  • Lascelles, colonel Peregrine, 340 n.
  • Laurence, Robt., of the Speedwell, 398.
  • Law, George, nonjurant minister, 127 and n.
  • Lead mines of Strontian, 83 and n.
  • Legrand, Mr., collector of the customs at Leith, 346.
  • Leighton (Layton), colonel, 354 and n, 358.[Pg 469]
  • Leith, of Freefield, 124, 147.
  • —— of Glenkindy, 114, 124.
  • Levy or militia money, 133-4.
  • Lewis, island of, acquired by the Mackenzies, 78.
  • Leys. See Burnett, sir Alex.
  • Liddel, John, in Haugh of Dalderse, 388.
  • Ligonier, Francis, colonel, 177 n.
  • —— sir John, 177 and n.
  • Ligonier’s regiment, 345 n, 349, 359 n, 410, 417.
  • Lining, Thomas, minister of Lesmahagow, 83 n.
  • Linlithgow, 359-60.
  • Lismore, 84.
  • Lochaber, 217, 396.
  • Loch Alsh, battle at, between Mackenzies and Macdonalds, 75 and n.
  • Locharkaig, 86.
  • Lochaskivay, 246.
  • Loch Boisdale, 248-9 n.
  • Loch Broom, 75, 96.
  • Loch Carron, 75, 77.
  • Loch Eynort (Lochynort), 250.
  • Loch Hourn or Hell Loch, 80.
  • Lochiel, 84, 86.
  • See Cameron, Donald.
  • Loch Maddy, 233.
  • Lochskiport, 253.
  • Loch Uskavagh (Lochisguiway), 260.
  • Lochynort, South Uist, 246.
  • Lockhart, major, taken prisoner at Falkirk, 199 and n.
  • Logie, merchant in Aberdeen, 138.
  • Long Island, 78 and n.
  • Lonmay. See Moir, William.
  • Loudoun, John Campbell, earl of, 104, 106-7, 109, 110, 134 and n, 162 n, 206, 271 n, 280 and n, 282-284, 298;
  • at the Rout of Moy, 101 n, 108 and n;
  • defeated by lord Lewis Gordon at Inverury, 143-6, 178 and n;
  • prevails upon Lovat to prevent his clan from rising, 289 n;
  • censures the laird of Grant for acting without orders, 294 and n;
  • letter to, from Grant, expressing his anxiety to do everything possible for the government, 299 n-300;
  • Loudoun’s reply, 301 and n;
  • writes to Grant regretting he is unable to supply his men with arms, 305 and n, 306.
  • Lovat, Simon Fraser, lord, 26, 41-2, 44 n, 45-6, 48, 82 n, 90 and n, 96, 106, 228 and n, 244 n, 279 n, 289 n.
  • Lumly, Mr., cipher name of lord Semple, q.v.
  • Lumsden, James, minister of Towey, 114.
  • Lundie house, Fife, 393.
  • Macaulay, Aulay, minister of Harris, 232 and n.
  • —— John, minister of South Uist, 232 and n, 234.
  • MacAulays of Kintail, 76 n.
  • Macbain, Alexander, minister of Inverness, his Memorial concerning the Highlands, 69-92.
  • —— Gillise, of Dalmagarrie, major in lady Mackintosh’s regiment, killed at Culloden, 101 and n.
  • Macbains join the rebels, 101.
  • M‘Cay. See Mackay.
  • MacCrimmon, Donald Ban, piper of Macleod, taken prisoner by the rebels at Inverurie, 145 and n;
  • killed at the Rout of Moy, 108 n, 145 n.
  • M‘Culloch, Roderick, of Glastulich, 98 and n.
  • Macdonald, Mrs., suspected of being the prince in disguise, 263.
  • —— of the Isles, earl of Ross, 79.
  • —— of Moidart, 79.
  • —— of Morar, 81 and n.
  • —— Æneas, banker in Paris, 8 and n;
  • accompanies prince Charles to Scotland, 82 n;
  • note on, 83 n.
  • —— Alexander, of Boisdale, 242;
  • refuses to join the rebels, 83 n;
  • taken prisoner, 245 and n;
  • his house plundered, 249.
  • —— —— of Glencoe, 86 and n.
  • —— —— yr. of Glengarry, 66 n, 67, 132 n.
  • —— —— of Keppoch, 88 n.
  • —— —— of Kingsburgh, 263 and n;
  • his interview with the prince near Monkstat house, 264.
  • —— sir Alexander, of Sleat, 25 n, 35 and n, 38, 39 n, 45, 63 n, 79, 83 n, 104, 207, 227 n, 243 n, 250 n, 262 and n, 263, 324.
  • —— Allan, of Morar, 81 and n, 82 n.
  • —— —— son of Scotus, 81 n.
  • —— —— [MacDowell], chaplain with the rebel army, 228 and n, 230, 231 n, 233.
  • —— Angus, of Borradale, 229 and n, 231.[Pg 470]
  • —— —— yr. of Glengarry, killed at the battle of Sgeir-na-Caillich [1603], 75.
  • —— —— son of Glengarry, 97 n;
  • letter from, to the bailie of Urquhart, threatening to ravage the country if men do not join his standard, 277-8;
  • accidentally killed at Falkirk, 277 and n, 302 n.
  • —— —— of Milltown, 259-60.
  • —— —— of Scotus, 81 and n.
  • —— —— [MacEachain], surgeon in Glengarry’s regiment, 229 and n.
  • —— Angusia, 279 n.
  • —— Archibald, of Barisdale [d. 1752], 96 and n.
  • —— —— [d. 1787], son of Coll, of Barisdale, 97 n.
  • —— Catherine, wife of Macleod of Bernera, 242 n.
  • —— Coll, of Barisdale, 74, 96 n, 100 n, 230, 240, 279 n, 281 n, 282, 320-1, 415;
  • sketch of his career, 96 and n.
  • —— —— [‘Coll of the Cows’], of Keppoch, defeats M‘Intosh at the battle of Mulroy, 87 and n;
  • his people papists and thieves, 88.
  • —— Donald, 231-2.
  • —— —— son of Clanranald, 242 and n.
  • —— —— brother of Glencoe, 86 n.
  • —— —— brother of Keppoch, 278 and n.
  • —— —— of Kinloch Moidart, 82 and n;
  • hanged in Carlisle, 83 n.
  • —— —— of Scotus, at Culloden, 81 n.
  • —— —— of Tiendrish, 278 and n.
  • —— —— Roy, 233 n.
  • —— Dougall, of Clanranald, 81 n.
  • —— Flora, 229 n, 230 n, 233 n, 250, 256, 266;
  • her first meeting with prince Charles, 251;
  • dresses the prince to pass as her maid, 260;
  • accompanies him to Trotternish, 262;
  • informs lady Macdonald of the prince’s whereabouts, 263;
  • a prisoner in London, 373 n.
  • —— Hugh, of Armadale, 244, 249 and n.
  • —— —— of Baleshare, 233 n, 243 and n.
  • —— —— vicar-apostolic of the Highlands, 82 n, 90 n.
  • —— James, brother of Glencoe, 86 n.
  • —— —— brother of Kinloch-Moidart, 83 n.
  • —— John, boatman, 259, 260.
  • —— —— doctor, 83 n.
  • —— —— of Glengarry, 25 n, 38.
  • —— —— of Guidale, 82 n.
  • —— —— son of Morar, 82 n.
  • —— —— son of Scotus, 81 n.
  • —— colonel John Andrew, of Glenaladale, 229 n.
  • —— lady Margaret, of Sleat, 243 n, 250 and n.
  • —— [MacEachain], Neil, his narrative of the wanderings of prince Charles in the Hebrides, 225-66.
  • —— Ranald, of Clanranald, 38, 79, 232, 237, 241.
  • —— lady, of Clanranald, 17 n, 20, 243 n, 246, 259, 260.
  • —— Ranald, yr. of Clanranald, 82 n, 230.
  • —— —— brother of Neil Maceachain, 238 and n.
  • —— —— of Kinloch-Moidart, 82 n.
  • —— —— brother of Kinloch-Moidart, 83 n.
  • —— —— son of Donald of Scotus, 81 n.
  • —— —— ‘Walpole,’ 253.
  • —— Rory, 231, 248, 259, 260.
  • Macdonalds lacking in loyalty to the throne, 79, 314;
  • defeated by Mackenzies at Sgeir-na-Caillich [1603], 75 and n;
  • at the battle of Prestonpans, 407;
  • many desertions during the retreat to the north, 302 n-304 n;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 195, 409, 411;
  • at Culloden, 213, 239, 417.
  • —— of Barisdale, 81 and n.
  • —— of Kinloch Moidart, 81.
  • M‘Dougall, William, merchant in Edinburgh, 51 and n.
  • MacDowell, Allan. See Macdonald.
  • M‘Eachan, Alexander, of Domondrack, 229.
  • —— or Macdonald, Neil. See Macdonald.
  • MacEachan-Macdonald of Drimindarach, 229 n.
  • MacEachans of Howbeg, 229 n.
  • M‘Gill, commander, 369.
  • M‘Gillivray (M‘Ilivrae), Alexander, of Dunmaglas, 101 and n, 147.
  • MacGillivrays join the rebels, 101.
  • Macgregor, Gregor, of Glengyle, 415.
  • —— or Drummond, William, of Balhaldy, 3-6, 8, 9, 12, 14 and n, 15 and n, 17, 19, 22, 28-30 and n, 32 n, 33 n, 39, 45-8, 54, 57, 58, 60, 66.[Pg 471]
  • Macgregors, 92;
  • at the battle of Prestonpans, 407;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409, 411;
  • ill-treat and plunder citizens of Aberdeen, 148.
  • Machany, Perthshire, 271 n.
  • Macivor, Finlay, piper, author of ‘The Campbells are Coming,’ 71 n.
  • Mackay, Alexander, of Auchmony, 279 and n.
  • —— (M‘Cay), Alexander, son of lord Reay, 103.
  • —— George, 3rd lord Reay, q.v.
  • Mackays of Strathnavar, 73.
  • Mackenzie, captain, 244.
  • —— of Culcoy, 100.
  • —— of Lentron, 100.
  • —— of Scatwell, refuses to join the rebels, 100.
  • —— Alex., of Fairburn, 91, 97 n, 100 and n.
  • —— Mrs., of Fairburn, 104 n.
  • —— Colin, earl of Seaforth, q.v.
  • —— —— minister of Lochs, 232 and n.
  • —— —— of Kildun, 235 n.
  • —— Mrs., of Kildun, 235.
  • —— George, of Balmuchie, 97 n.
  • —— James, of Cappoch, 75.
  • —— John, of Ardloch, 71 n, 74, 75.
  • —— —— of Kintail, 78 n.
  • —— Kenneth, lord Fortrose, q.v.
  • —— —— captain in Barisdale’s regiment, 100 n.
  • —— Roderick, of Coigeach, 78 n.
  • —— sir Roderick, tutor of Kintail, 74 n, 78 n.
  • Mackenzies acquire Assynt, 73-4 n;
  • and the lands of Macleod of Lewis, 78 n;
  • defeat Macdonalds at Sgeir-na-Caillich, 75 and n;
  • join the rebels, 100.
  • —— of Applecross and Loch Carron, 75.
  • —— of Gairloch, 75.
  • —— of Loch Broom, 75.
  • —— of Seaforth, 90.
  • M‘Kilikin, John, minister of Loch Alsh, 77.
  • Mackinnon, John, of Mackinnon, 80 and n.
  • Mackintosh, bailie in Inverness, 104.
  • —— Æneas, of Mackintosh, refuses to join the rebels, 101 and n;
  • taken prisoner at Dornoch, 101 n;
  • sent home by the prince, 102 n.
  • —— Anne, wife of Mackintosh of Mackintosh, 101, 108 n, 205;
  • raises a regiment for prince Charles, 101 and n;
  • her reception of her husband after his liberation;
  • meets the duke of Cumberland in London, 102 n.
  • —— Lachlan, of Mackintosh, defeated by Keppoch at Mulroy, 87 and n, 88.
  • —— captain William, 293 n.
  • Mackintoshes, 277 and n;
  • arm for king George, aftw. join prince Charles, 101, 271 n;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • M‘Lachlan, rev. John, of Kilchoan, 85 and n.
  • —— Lachlan, of MacLachlan, killed at Culloden, 85 and n.
  • MacLauchlans, 407;
  • in Ardnamurchan, 83;
  • at Culloden, 85 n.
  • —— of Morven, 84.
  • Maclean of Ardgour, 84.
  • —— of Coll, 80.
  • —— of Dowart, 85.
  • —— of Kingairloch, 84.
  • —— of Lochbuie, 85.
  • —— Allan, of Brolas, 85 n.
  • —— Charles, of Drimnin, killed at Culloden, 85 n.
  • —— sir Hector, of Duart, 85 and n.
  • Macleans in the ’45, 85 and n;
  • at Culloden, 85 n, 417.
  • —— of Morven, 84.
  • MacLennans of Glenshiel, 76 n.
  • Macleod, Alexander, advocate, and aide-de-camp to prince Charles, 52 n, 227 and n, 228.
  • —— —— lieut. in the Macleod militia, 263 and n.
  • —— —— of Luskintyre, 242 and n.
  • —— —— of Ulinish, 244 and n.
  • —— Donald, of Geanies, 107 n.
  • —— —— of Gualtergil, 230 and n, 231 and n, 233, 234.
  • —— Hugh, of Geanies, 74, 104, 107 and n, 110, 285.
  • —— Janet, wife of sir James Campbell, of Auchenbreck, 6 n.
  • —— John, lord, son of George, earl of Cromartie, 71 n, 72 n, 96 and n, 97, 104 n.
  • —— —— father of Donald, of Geanies, 107 n.
  • —— —— of Muiravonside, 52 and n, 227 and n.
  • —— Margaret, 242 n.
  • [Pg 472]—— Margaret, wife of sir Roderick Mackenzie, tutor of Kintail, 74 and n.
  • —— Neil, betrayer of Montrose, 107 n.
  • —— —— the last of the Macleods of Assynt, 74 n.
  • —— Norman, of Macleod, 44 and n, 65, 95, 104, 110, 136-46, 227 n, 284, 290-1, 293 and n, 298.
  • —— sir Norman, of Bernera, 227 n, 242 n.
  • —— Roderick, the last of the Macleods of Lewis, 78 n.
  • —— Torquil, of Lewis, 74 n.
  • —— —— Connanach, 78 n.
  • —— William, of Luskintyre, 242.
  • Macleods, 284-5;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • —— of Assynt, 73-4.
  • —— of Cogach, 74.
  • —— of Lewis, 78 and n.
  • Macmillan, Alexander, of Dunmore, keeper of the signet, 49 n.
  • M‘Murich, John, 260.
  • Macneil, Anne, wife of Macdonald of Boisdale, 247 and n, 248-9.
  • —— Roderick, of Barra, 79 and n.
  • MacNicols of Assynt, 74 n.
  • Macpherson of Cluny, 186, 240, 271 n, 415.
  • —— Malcolm, corporal in the Black Watch, shot for desertion, 43 n.
  • —— Samuel, corporal in the Black Watch, shot for desertion, 43 n.
  • Macphersons, 277 and n, 305 n.
  • —— of Cluny, at the battle of Falkirk, 409;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • Macrae (MacRaw), captain in Glengarry’s regiment, 77 n.
  • —— Alexander, lieut., 77 n.
  • —— (Macgrath or M‘Kra), Gilchrist, 77 n.
  • —— (Macraith), James, captain in Berwick’s regiment, 77 n.
  • —— (M‘Raw) Murdoch, hanged as a spy, 77 n.
  • M‘Raes of Kintail, said to be descended from the Campbells, 76 and n-77.
  • Maillebois, maréchal de, 12 and n.
  • Maitland, of Pitrichy, 124, 138;
  • taken prisoner by the rebels, 145-6.
  • Malt tax, 122, 134.
  • Mamore, 86.
  • Manchester, 171;
  • the bells having been rung for the rebels, 171;
  • now ring for the enemy, 179.
  • Manchester regiment, 171-4.
  • March, William Douglas, 3rd earl of, aftw. Queensberry, duke of, q.v.
  • Marischal, George Keith, 10th earl, 7 and n, 11, 21, 26, 29, 38, 58;
  • letter to, from Murray of Broughton, 27-8 and n;
  • letter from, commanding his people to join lord John Drummond, 132, 292 n;
  • its authenticity, 132.
  • Masterman, Thomas, of the Ann, 398.
  • Mathesons of Loch Alsh, 75.
  • Maxwell, Dr., 372.
  • —— Mr., cipher name of Macgregor of Balhaldy, q.v.
  • —— William, of Carruchan, escapes from Carlisle, 193 and n.
  • Menzies of Pitfodels, 122.
  • Mercer, Mr., 121.
  • Metcalf, John, road-maker and musician, 158 n.
  • Middleton, of Seaton, 124, 162.
  • Moidart, 81.
  • Moir, Charles, brother of Stonywood, 122.
  • —— James, of Stonywood, 102, 116-117, 122, 128, 130, 133, 135 n, 138, 151.
  • —— William, of Lonmay, 121 and n, 128, 136, 150-1;
  • letter to, from lord John Drummond, 293 n.
  • Monaltrie. See Farquharson, James.
  • Monkstat house, 262 and n.
  • Monro. See Munro.
  • Moore, Mr., cipher name of Dr. Barry, q.v.
  • Morar, 81-2.
  • —— laird of. See Macdonald, Allan.
  • Mordaunt, brigadier-general, 418.
  • Morgan, captain, arrested for rioting in Aberdeen, 163 n.
  • —— David, barrister and ‘the pretender’s counsellor,’ 172 and n.
  • Morison, Roderick, minister of Kintail, on the descent of the Macraes, 76 n.
  • Morris, Mr., cipher name for Charles Smith, q.v.
  • Morven, 84, 85.
  • Moy, the ‘Rout of Moy,’ 101 n, 108 and n, 145 n, 306 and n.
  • Muchals. See Castle Fraser.
  • Muckle Ferry, near Dornoch, 110.
  • Muick or Glenshiel, 76 and n.
  • Muiravonside, 227 n.
  • [Pg 473] —— laird of. See Macleod, John.
  • Mulben, 290, 295.
  • Mull, island of, 85.
  • Mulroy, battle of [1688], 87 and n.
  • Munro, Daniel, minister of Tain, his Account of the late Rebellion from Ross and Sutherland, 93-110.
  • —— Dr. Duncan, killed at the battle of Falkirk, 198 and n.
  • —— George, of Culcairn, 103 and n, 104, 107, 115, 136-7, 139, 142, 293 and n.
  • —— sir Harry, of Foulis, 103.
  • —— Hugh, of Teaninich, 103.
  • —— sir Robert, of Foulis, 103 n;
  • killed at the battle of Falkirk, 198 and n, 413.
  • —— William, of Achany, 103.
  • Munros and their loyalty to the government, 46 and n, 103.
  • Murchisons of Loch Alsh, 75.
  • Murray, lady Anna, 123 n.
  • —— sir David, of Stanhope, 83 and n.
  • —— lord George, 149, 158 n, 174 and n, 186 n, 206 and n, 354, 361;
  • at the battle of Prestonpans, 407;
  • the quarrel with Balmerino, 200;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 194-6 and n, 409, 411, 413;
  • his night attack on Cumberland’s forces at Nairn, 415;
  • at Culloden, 211 and n, 212-13 and n, 239-40, 417;
  • his flight from the battlefield, 216;
  • attributes much of the disaster of the battle to Hay of Restalrig, 223.
  • —— sir James, of Stanhope, 83 n.
  • —— John, of Broughton, his History of the first Rise and Progress of the late Rebellion, 1742-1744, 1-66;
  • letter from, to the Chevalier, 36-7, 54-60;
  • letter from, to prince Charles, 60-8;
  • letters from, to Edgar, 20 and n-27, 37-41, 45 and n;
  • letter from, to the earl
  • marischal, 27-8 and n;
  • letters to, from the Chevalier, 30-4;
  • letters to, from Edgar, 18-19, 30.
  • —— lord John, 219.
  • —— Margaret, dau. of lord James Murray, 101 n.
  • —— sir Patrick, of Ochtertyre, attempts to capture the duke of Perth, 118 n.
  • —— Veronica, 51 n.
  • —— hon. William, solicitor-general, 331 and n.
  • Nairn, 210.
  • Nairne, lord, 406-7.
  • Narsom, cipher name for John Murray, q.v.
  • New, laird of. See Forbes.
  • Newcastle, duke of, 228 n, 370, 401;
  • letter to, from general Price, 396;
  • petition to, from Grant of Sheugly, James, yr. of Sheugly, and John Grant, minister of Urquhart, 329;
  • letter to, from the attorney-general recommending that Grant of Sheugly be admitted to bail and tried in Edinburgh, 331.
  • Newton Pow, 351.
  • Nicolson, cipher name for Macleod of Macleod, q.v.
  • Nisbet, of Dirleton, 33 n, 64.
  • Nonjurant clergy in Aberdeen and Banff favour the Jacobites, 126;
  • their meeting houses destroyed in Aberdeen, 156.
  • North Uist, 79.
  • Nuntown, in Benbecula, 256 and n.
  • Ogilvie, lord, 208, 214, 410;
  • his regiment, 149 and n.
  • —— of Achires, 121.
  • —— Janet, dau. of the earl of Findlater and wife of Forbes of Skeleter, 113 n.
  • —— John, 289 n.
  • —— lady Margaret, 275 n.
  • —— William, 289 n.
  • Old Aberdeen ordered by the rebels to provide £215 of levy money, 135.
  • Old Meldrum, 153.
  • Oliphant, yr. of Gask, at the battle of Falkirk, 412.
  • O’Neil, captain Felix, 230 and n, 231 n, 237 n, 249, 250, 252, 256, 258-60.
  • Orrery, lord, 47 and n.
  • Orri, M., French minister of finance, 66.
  • Osborne, John, principal of Marischal College, 152.
  • O’Sullivan, colonel John William, 196 n, 210, 228, 230 and n, 231 n, 237 n, 249;
  • at Culloden, 416.
  • Paisley regiment, 345 n, 350 and n, 351.
  • [Pg 474] Papists of Aberdeen and Banff support the Jacobites, 127.
  • Park. See Gordon, sir William.
  • Paterson, sir Hugh, of Bannockburn, 11 n.
  • Paton, of Grandam, 124, 147.
  • Peirson, John, master of the Pretty Janet, 387.
  • Perth, James, [Jacobite] duke of, 7, 15 and n, 16, 17, 25 n, 35-7, 64, 67-8, 159, 181, 183, 206, 210, 212, 219, 222, 271 and n, 298 n;
  • proposes to take Stirling castle, 31 and n, 40;
  • rejected by a lady in York, 37;
  • suspected by the government, 48, 49;
  • attempts to take him prisoner, 53 and n, 118 and n;
  • at the battle of Prestonpans, 168, 170, 174 and n, 175, 407;
  • on the way north is attacked at Kendal, 184;
  • warrant issued for his apprehension, 393;
  • assists his soldiers in the crossing of the Esk, 188;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 410;
  • at Culloden, 214, 415-17;
  • in Ruthven of Badenoch, 216;
  • sails for France, 222-3;
  • buried at sea, 224.
  • Petrie, James, advocate in Aberdeen, 128;
  • reads the pretender’s manifesto at the Cross, 119 and n;
  • joins the rebels under Pitsligo, 121;
  • causes Maitland of Pitrichy to be taken by the rebels, 145-6.
  • Pitcalnie, lairds of. See Ross.
  • Pitsligo. See Forbes, Alexander.
  • Pitully. See Cuming.
  • Presbyterian ministers at the battle of Falkirk, 198 and n.
  • Preston, 170.
  • Prestonpans, battle of, 103-5 and n, 119, 122, 277, 343, 363, 405-9;
  • prisoners taken by the rebels interned in Perthshire and Fife, 364 and n.
  • Price, John, governor of Berwick, 370;
  • letter from, to the duke of Newcastle, 396.
  • Price’s regiment, 153, 345 n, 349, 410, 417.
  • Pulrossie, 110.
  • Pulteney’s regiment, 158 and n, 411, 418.
  • Queensberry, Charles Douglas, 3rd duke of, 6 and n.
  • —— William Douglas, 4th duke of, 6 n.
  • Rae, David, nonjuring minister in Edinburgh, father of lord Eskgrove, 34.
  • Rattray, Thomas, of Craighall-Rattray, bp. of Dunkeld, 17 n, 18 and n, 20, 34, 39 and n.
  • Reay, George Mackay, 3rd lord, 72, 73 and n, 104, 109.
  • Reed, sir Alexander, of Barra, 124.
  • Reid, Patrick, minister of Clatt, 150 and n.
  • Rich, Robert, lieut.-colonel of Barrel’s regiment, 153 and n.
  • Robertsons of Strowan, 407.
  • Rose, of Kilravock, 273.
  • Roshiness, Benbecula, 231, 237, 252, 256-9.
  • Ross, the master of, 104, 105 and n, 108-9, 207.
  • —— of Balnagowan, 105 n.
  • —— of Inverchasley, 105, 106, 108-110.
  • —— hon. Charles, 105 n.
  • —— David, of Balnagowan, 105 n.
  • —— George, 13th lord, 105 n.
  • —— Malcolm, yr. of Pitcalnie, 105 and n;
  • his men having joined the government forces, he joins the rebels, 106.
  • —— earldom, 105 n.
  • Rosses of Ross-shire, 105 and n.
  • Rout of Moy, 101 n, 108 n, 145 n, 306 and n.
  • Roxburgh, John, of the Jean, 398.
  • Rueval hill, Benbecula, 259 and n.
  • Ruthven in Badenoch, 215, 271, 418;
  • barracks demolished by the highlanders, 204.
  • —— castle burnt, 305 n.
  • Rutton, Dr., 16 n.
  • Ryder, sir Dudley, attorney-general, letter to the duke of Newcastle, recommending that, no evidence being produced, Grant of Sheugly be admitted to bail and tried in Edinburgh, 331 and n.
  • St. Ninian’s church blown up, 201.
  • Salton, Alexander Fraser, lord, 123 and n.
  • Sandilands [Sanderson], Mr., in Aberdeen, 121-2.
  • Sanstoun. See Huntly Lodge.
  • Saunders, John, in Keith, 287 n.
  • Scalpa, 233.
  • Scots Brigade, recruiting for service in the Netherlands, 43 and n.
  • [Pg 475] Scott, captain Carolina Frederick, a relentless hunter of fugitive Jacobites, 248 and n, 249.
  • Seaforth, countess of, 100 n.
  • —— Colin, earl of, 78 n, 90.
  • —— George, earl of, 91.
  • —— Kenneth, earl of, 91.
  • —— William, 5th earl of, 104 n.
  • Seaton, a priest, 127 and n.
  • Semple (Sempill), Hugh, lord, 3, 6, 8, 12-16, 19, 26-30, 39, 45 n, 46 n, 53, 58, 60, 66, 164 and n;
  • accusations against him by Cecil and Charles Smith, 21-3.
  • Semple’s regiment, 417.
  • Seton, of Touch, 11 n.
  • Shannon’s regiment, 181 n.
  • Shap, 185.
  • Sharpe, John, solicitor to the treasury, 332, 335 and n;
  • report by, on the services of Walter Grossett, 400-2.
  • Shaw, Farquhar, soldier in the Black Watch, shot for desertion, 43 n.
  • —— sir John, 337 and n, 397.
  • Sheridan, Thomas, private secretary to James II., 223 n.
  • —— sir Thomas, 219;
  • sails for France, 223 and n.
  • Sime or Syme, John, minister of Lonmay, 299 n.
  • Simpson, James, 388.
  • Sinclair, George, of Geese, 72 n.
  • —— —— of Keiss, aftw. earl of Caithness, q.v.
  • Sinclair’s regiment, 410, 417.
  • Skeleter, laird of. See Forbes, George.
  • Skye, island of, the inhabitants converted to protestantism, 80 and n.
  • Smith, of Menie, 131.
  • ——- Charles, banker in Boulogne, 11 and n, 15-16 and n, 18, 21, 26-8, 38, 62 n, 99 n.
  • —— James, minister at Creich, 77.
  • —— commodore Thomas, 372 and n;
  • Flora Macdonald a prisoner in his charge, 373 n.
  • Smuggling on the increase, 336.
  • Somers, Richard, commissioner of the customs, 381, 385.
  • Spalding, Charles, of Whitefield, taken prisoner by the rebels, 344 and n.
  • Spanish ship arrives at Peterhead with supplies for the rebels, 148.
  • Spengadale, 110.
  • Stapleton, Walter, lieut.-colonel, 409;
  • at Culloden, 213 n, 417.
  • Stewart, captain, a prisoner with the rebels, 364.
  • —— hon. Anne, wife of Alexander Hay of Drumelzier, 26 and n.
  • —— Archibald, lord provost of Edinburgh, 43, 341-2 and n.
  • —— Charles, of Ardshiel, 54 and n, 58, 86 n.
  • —— Dugald, of Appin, 38, 86 and n.
  • —— sir James, of Burray, 72 n.
  • —— —— of Goodtrees, 43 and n, 52, 64, 99 n.
  • —— John, in Lochaber, 313.
  • —— —— Roy, 149 and n, 153-5, 159, 367 and n, 374, 395;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 410-11;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • —— lady Mary, wife of lord Fortrose, 104 n.
  • Stewarts of Appin at the battle of Prestonpans, 407;
  • at the battle of Falkirk, 409, 411;
  • at Culloden, 417.
  • Stirling, taken by rebels, 192 and n.
  • —— castle, 31 and n;
  • the siege, 192, 199, 201, 302 n, 409.
  • Stonywood, 161.
  • —— laird of. See Moir, James.
  • Stormont, David, 4th lord, 331 n.
  • Strathallan, lord, at the battle of Falkirk, 410, 412.
  • Strathallan’s Horse, 151 n.
  • Strathavon, 91, 92, 113 n, 274, 307.
  • Strathbogie, 92, 114-15, 118, 129, 153, 155.
  • Strathdearn, 91 and n, 113 n, 305 n.
  • Strathdown, now Strathavon, q.v.
  • Stratherrick, 89, 228.
  • Strathglass, 90.
  • Strathlachlan, 85.
  • —— laird of. See MacLachlan, Lachlan.
  • Strathlochy, 86.
  • Strathnairn, 91.
  • Strathnavar, 73.
  • Strathspey, 91.
  • Strichen, lord, 124, 299 n.
  • Strontian lead quarry, 83 and n.
  • Stuart, Charles Edward, lands in Scotland, 269, 323;
  • in Edinburgh, 342;
  • defeats Cope at Prestonpans, 343, 405-9;
  • marches into England, 174-6;
  • returns to Scotland, 177-87 and n;
  • in Glasgow, 191 and n;
  • besieges Stirling[Pg 476] castle, 192, 199, 201, 302 n, 409;
  • defeats Hawley at Falkirk, 194-8, 409-10;
  • desertions from the army, 199, 201;
  • at Culloden house;
  • takes Inverness town and castle;
  • receives reinforcements, 205;
  • want of discipline in his army, 208;
  • at Drummossie muir, 414;
  • forced to fight or starve, 415;
  • the futile night march, 210-11 and n, 415-16;
  • disposition of his forces before the battle, 417;
  • his responsibility for the battle of Culloden, 212-13 and n;
  • meets lord Lovat at Gortuleg, 227-8 and n, 418;
  • at Borradale, 229 and n;
  • driven by a storm to Benbecula, 231 and n;
  • lands at Scalpa, in Harris, 233;
  • at Kildun, 235 and n;
  • returns to Scalpa, 235;
  • chased by the Baltimore, 236;
  • at Benbecula, in the care of Clanranald, 237 and n;
  • conducted by Neil Maceachain to Corradale, 238 and n;
  • describes the battle of Culloden to Neil Maceachain, 239;
  • blames lord George Murray, 239-40;
  • given to drink, 241, 242 and n, 247;
  • claims to have shot a whale, 241;
  • eight days in Fuyia, 245;
  • visited by lady Clanranald;
  • sails to Lochynort, 246;
  • learns of the enemy being at Boisdale, 249;
  • meets Flora Macdonald, 251;
  • in a storm of wind and rain to Roshiness, 254-5;
  • tortured by rain and midges, 257;
  • joined by lady Clanranald and Flora Macdonald, 259;
  • narrow escape from being taken by general Campbell, 259 and n;
  • disguised, 260;
  • his companions, 260;
  • at Watersay, 261;
  • at Trotternish, 262;
  • meets Kingsburgh, 264;
  • disguised as Betty Burke, 265;
  • letter to, from Murray of Broughton, 60-8.
  • —— Henry, cardinal. See York, duke of.
  • —— James Francis, 67;
  • letter from the Chevalier to Murray of Broughton, 30-4;
  • letters to, from Murray, 36, 41, 54-60.
  • Sutherland, William, earl of, 73 and n, 104, 109.
  • Swedish troops for Scotland, 12 and n, 22 and n.
  • Symson, Patrick, minister at Fala, an ensign in Thornton’s company of volunteers, 158 and n.
  • Taylor, William, 287 n.
  • —— —— minister of New Deer, disarms a pillaging hussar, 151 and n.
  • —— of Fachfield, 121.
  • —— yr. of Fachfield, 121.
  • —— Mr., supervisor of excise, 138.
  • Thornton, William, of Thornville, 158 and n.
  • Tochineal. See Grant, Alex.
  • Tongue presbytery, 73 n.
  • Torry, 115 and n.
  • Towneley, Charles, of Towneley Hall, 173 n.
  • —— Francis, joins the prince at Preston, 172 n;
  • made colonel of the Manchester regiment, 173 n;
  • governor of Carlisle, 118 n, 186, 193.
  • Traquair, countess of, 51.
  • —— Charles Stuart, earl of, 3 and n, 4, 5, 9, 14-17 and n, 20 and n, 22 n, 23, 25, 28 and n, 30, 32 n, 36, 39, 40-9, 51-9, 53, 56-7, 63-5, 67.
  • Trotternish, 262.
  • Tulloch, David, in Dunbennan, 118 and n, 288 n.
  • Turner, yr. of Turnerhall, 121.
  • Urquhart, 89.
  • —— chamberlain of. See Grant, John.
  • —— colonel, 18.
  • Vaughan, William, joins the prince at Preston, 172 n.
  • Vint, Peggie, tavern-keeper in Prestonpans, 44 and n.
  • Waite, Thomas, 322, 329.
  • Walkinshaw, Clementina, 11 n.
  • Watersay, isle of Skye, 261.
  • Watson, Mr., cipher name of Macgregor of Balhaldy, q.v.
  • Wedderburn, Alexander, ship master, 387.
  • Weir or Vere, captain, a government spy, 175 and n, 193.
  • Wemyss, lady Elizabeth, wife of the earl of Sutherland, 73 n.
  • [Pg 477] —— lady Frances, wife of Stewart of Goodtrees, 43 and n.
  • Whitney, colonel, killed at the battle of Falkirk, 198, 413.
  • Wigan, 171.
  • Witherspoon, John, minister of Beith, 198 n.
  • Wolfe, James, at Culloden, 99 n.
  • Wolfe’s regiment, 374, 399, 411, 417.
  • Wynn, sir Watkin Williams, of Wynnstay, 47 and n, 172 n.
  • York mayor and aldermen promise 10,000 men on the landing of the Chevalier, 35-7.
  • —— Henry Stuart, duke of, 37.
  • Yorkshire Hunters’ regiment, 183 and n.

Printed by T. and A. Constable, Printers to His Majesty at the Edinburgh University Press

Printed by T. and A. Officer, Printers to the King at the Edinburgh University Press


[Pg 1]

[Pg 1]

Scottish History Society.

Scottish History Society.

THE EXECUTIVE.

THE EXECUTIVE.

1915-1916.

1915-1916.

President.

President.

The Earl of Rosebery, K.G., K.T., LL.D.

The Earl of Rosebery, K.G., K.T., LL.D.

Chairman of Council.

Council Chair.

Donald Crawford, K.C.

Donald Crawford, K.C.

Council.

Committee.

  • The Honorable Lord Guthrie.
  • D. Hay Fleming, LL.D.
  • James MacLehose, LL.D.
  • Sir James Balfour Paul, C.V.O., LL.D., Lyon King of Arms.
  • Sheriff Scott-Moncrieff.
  • A. Francis Steuart, Advocate.
  • C.S. Romanes, C.A.
  • Sir G.M. Paul, D.K.S.
  • R.K. Hannay.
  • Professor P. Hume Brown, M.A., LL.D., Historiographer-Royal for Scotland.
  • William K. Dickson, Advocate.
  • J.R.N. Macphail, K.C.

Corresponding Members of the Council.

Council Corresponding Members.

Prof. C. H. Firth, LL.D., Oxford; Rev. W. D. Macray, Greenlands, Bloxham, Banbury, Oxon.; Prof. C. Sanford Terry, Aberdeen.

Prof. C. H. Firth, LL.D., Oxford; Rev. W. D. Macray, Greenlands, Bloxham, Banbury, Oxon.; Prof. C. Sanford Terry, Aberdeen.

Hon. Treasurer.

Hon. Treasurer

J. T. Clark, Crear Villa, 196 Ferry Road, Edinburgh.

J.T. Clark, Crear Villa, 196 Ferry Road, Edinburgh.

Hon. Secretary.

Hon. Secretary.

J. Maitland Thomson, LL.D., Advocate, 3 Grosvenor Gardens, Edinburgh.

J. Maitland Thomson, LL.D., Lawyer, 3 Grosvenor Gardens, Edinburgh.

[Pg 2]

[Pg 2]

RULES

RULES

1. The object of the Society is the discovery and printing, under selected editorship, of unpublished documents illustrative of the civil, religious, and social history of Scotland. The Society will also undertake, in exceptional cases, to issue translations of printed works of a similar nature, which have not hitherto been accessible in English.

1. The purpose of the Society is to find and publish unpublished documents that shed light on the civil, religious, and social history of Scotland, with chosen editors overseeing the process. In special cases, the Society will also consider releasing translations of similar printed works that have not been available in English until now.

2. The number of Members of the Society shall be limited to 400.

2. The number of members in the Society will be limited to 400.

3. The affairs of the Society shall be managed by a Council, consisting of a Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary, and twelve elected Members, five to make a quorum. Three of the twelve elected Members shall retire annually by ballot, but they shall be eligible for re-election.

3. The Society will be run by a Council, made up of a Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary, and twelve elected Members, with five required for a quorum. Every year, three of the twelve elected Members will step down through a vote, but they can run for re-election.

4. The Annual Subscription to the Society shall be One Guinea. The publications of the Society shall not be delivered to any Member whose Subscription is in arrear, and no Member shall be permitted to receive more than one copy of the Society’s publications.

4. The annual subscription to the Society will be one guinea. The Society's publications will not be given to any member who has not paid their subscription, and no member will be allowed to receive more than one copy of the Society’s publications.

5. The Society will undertake the issue of its own publications, i.e. without the intervention of a publisher or any other paid agent.

5. The Society will handle the publication of its own materials, i.e. without involving a publisher or any other paid representative.

6. The Society will issue yearly two octavo volumes of about 320 pages each.

6. The Society will publish two octavo volumes each year, with around 320 pages in each.

7. An Annual General Meeting of the Society shall be held at the end of October, or at an approximate date to be determined by the Council.

7. The Society will hold an Annual General Meeting at the end of October, or on a similar date to be decided by the Council.

8. Two stated Meetings of the Council shall be held each year, one on the last Tuesday of May, the other on the Tuesday preceding the day upon which the Annual General Meeting shall be held. The Secretary, on the request of three Members of the Council, shall call a special meeting of the Council.

8. Two scheduled meetings of the Council will take place each year, one on the last Tuesday of May and the other on the Tuesday before the Annual General Meeting. The Secretary must call a special meeting of the Council if requested by three Council Members.

9. Editors shall receive 20 copies of each volume they edit for the Society.

9. Editors will receive 20 copies of each volume they edit for the Society.

10. The owners of Manuscripts published by the Society will also be presented with a certain number of copies.

10. The owners of manuscripts published by the Society will also receive a set number of copies.

11. The Annual Balance-Sheet, Rules, and List of Members shall be printed.

11. The Annual Balance Sheet, Rules, and List of Members will be printed.

12. No alteration shall be made in these Rules except at a General Meeting of the Society. A fortnight’s notice of any alteration to be proposed shall be given to the Members of the Council.

12. No changes can be made to these Rules except at a General Meeting of the Society. Members of the Council must be given two weeks' notice of any proposed changes.


[Pg 3]

[Pg 3]

PUBLICATIONS
OF THE
SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY

PUBLICATIONS
OF THE
SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY

For the year 1886-1887.

For the year 1886-1887.

1. Bishop Pococke’s Tours in Scotland, 1747-1760. Edited by D. W. Kemp.

1. Bishop Pococke’s Travels in Scotland, 1747-1760. Edited by D.W. Kemp.

2. Diary and Account Book of William Cunningham of Craigends, 1673-1680. Edited by the Rev. James Dodds, D.D.

2. Diary and Account Book of William Cunningham of Craigends, 1673-1680. Edited by the Rev. James Dodds, D.D.

For the year 1887-1888.

For the year 1887-1888.

3. Grameidos libri sex: an heroic poem on the Campaign of 1689, by James Philip of Almerieclose. Translated and edited by the Rev. A. D. Murdoch.

3. Six books of Grameidos: an epic poem about the Campaign of 1689, by James Phillips of Almerieclose. Translated and edited by the Rev. A.D. Murdoch.

4. The Register of the Kirk-Session of St. Andrews. Part I. 1559-1582. Edited by D. Hay Fleming.

4. The Register of the Church Session of St. Andrews. Part I. 1559-1582. Edited by D. Hay Fleming.

For the year 1888-1889.

For the year 1888-1889.

5. Diary of the Rev. John Mill, Minister in Shetland, 1740-1803. Edited by Gilbert Goudie.

5. Rev. John Mill's Diary, Minister in Shetland, 1740-1803. Edited by Gilbert Goudie.

6. Narrative of Mr. James Nimmo, a Covenanter, 1654-1709. Edited by W. G. Scott-Moncrieff.

6. The story of Mr. James Nimmo, a Covenanter, 1654-1709. Edited by W. G. Scott-Moncrieff.

7. The Register of the Kirk-Session of St. Andrews. Part II. 1583-1600. Edited by D. Hay Fleming.

7. The Record of the Church Session of St. Andrews. Part II. 1583-1600. Edited by D. Hay Fleming.

For the year 1889-1890.

For the year 1889-90.

8. A List of Persons concerned in the Rebellion (1745). With a Preface by the Earl of Rosebery.

8. A List of People Involved in the Rebellion (1745). With a Preface by the Earl of Rosebery.

Presented to the Society by the Earl of Rosebery.

Presented to the Society by the Earl of Rosebery.

9. Glamis Papers: The ‘Book of Record,’ a Diary written by Patrick, first Earl of Strathmore, and other documents (1684-89). Edited by A. H. Millar.

9. Glamis Documents: The ‘Record Book,’ a diary written by Patrick, 1st Earl of Strathmore, and other documents (1684-89). Edited by A. H. Millar.

10. John Major’s History of Greater Britain (1521). Translated and edited by Archibald Constable.

10. John Major’s History of Greater Britain (1521). Translated and edited by Archibald Constable.

For the year 1890-1891.

For the year 1890-1891.

11. The Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies, 1646-47. Edited by the Rev. Professor Mitchell, D.D., and the Rev. James Christie, D.D.

11. The Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies, 1646-47. Edited by Rev. Professor Mitchell, D.D., and Rev. James Christie, D.D.

12. Court-Book of the Barony of Urie, 1604-1747. Edited by the Rev. D. G. Barron.

12. Court Book of the Barony of Urie, 1604-1747. Edited by Rev. D.G. Barron.

[Pg 4]

[Pg 4]

For the year 1891-1892.

For the year 1891-1892.

13. Memoirs of Sir John Clerk of Penicuik, Baronet. Extracted by himself from his own Journals, 1676-1755. Edited by John M. Gray.

13. Memoirs of Sir John Clerk of Penicuik, Baronet. Taken from his own journals, 1676-1755. Edited by John M. Gray.

14. Diary of Col. the Hon. John Erskine of Carnock, 1683-1687. Edited by the Rev. Walter Macleod.

14. Diary of Colonel the Honorable John Erskine of Carnock, 1683-1687. Edited by the Rev. Walter MacLeod.

For the year 1892-1893.

For the 1892-1893 year.

15. Miscellany of the Scottish History Society, First Volume.—The Library of James vi., 1573-83. Edited by G. F. Warner.—Documents illustrating Catholic Policy, 1596-98. T. G. Law.—Letters of Sir Thomas Hope, 1627-46. Rev. R. Paul.—Civil War Papers, 1643-50. H. F. Morland Simpson.—Lauderdale Correspondence, 1660-77. Right Rev. John Dowden, D.D.—Turnbull’s Diary, 1657-1704. Rev. R. Paul.—Masterton Papers, 1660-1719. V. A. Noël Paton.—Accompt of Expenses in Edinburgh, 1715. A. H. Millar.—Rebellion Papers, 1715 and 1745. H. Paton.

15. Collection of the Scottish History Society, First Volume.—James VI's Library, 1573-83. Edited by G. F. Warner.—Documents on Catholic Policy, 1596-98. T. G. Law.—Letters from Sir Thomas Hope, 1627-46. Rev. R. Paul.—Civil War Documents, 1643-50. H. F. Morland Simpson.—Lauderdale Correspondence, 1660-77. Right Rev. John Dowden, D.D.—Turnbull's Diary, 1657-1704. Rev. R. Paul.—Masterton Papers, 1660-1719. V. A. Noël Paton.—Expenses Report in Edinburgh, 1715. A. H. Millar.—Rebellion Documents, 1715 and 1745. H. Paton.

16. Account Book of Sir John Foulis of Ravelston (1671-1707). Edited by the Rev. A. W. Cornelius Hallen.

16. Account Book of Sir John Foulis of Ravelston (1671-1707). Edited by the Rev. A.W. Cornelius Hallen.

For the year 1893-1894.

For the year 1893-94.

17. Letters and Papers illustrating the Relations between Charles ii. and Scotland in 1650. Edited by Samuel Rawson Gardiner, D.C.L., etc.

17. Letters and Documents Revealing the Relationship between Charles II and Scotland in 1650. Edited by Samuel Rawson Gardiner, D.C.L., etc.

18. Scotland and the Commonwealth. Letters and Papers relating to the Military Government of Scotland, Aug. 1651-Dec. 1653. Edited by C. H. Firth, M.A.

18. Scotland and the Commonwealth. Letters and documents related to the Military Government of Scotland, Aug. 1651-Dec. 1653. Edited by C. H. Firth, M.A.

For the year 1894-1895.

For the year 1894-1895.

19. The Jacobite Attempt of 1719. Letters of James, second Duke of Ormonde. Edited by W. K. Dickson.

19. The Jacobite Rebellion of 1719. Letters from James, the second Duke of Ormonde. Edited by W.K. Dickson.

20, 21. The Lyon in Mourning, or a Collection of Speeches, Letters, Journals, etc., relative to the Affairs of Prince Charles Edward Stuart, by Bishop Forbes. 1746-1775. Edited by Henry Paton. Vols. I. and II.

20, 21. The Lyon in Mourning, or a Collection of Speeches, Letters, Journals, etc., related to the matters of Prince Charles Edward Stuart, by Bishop Forbes. 1746-1775. Edited by Henry Paton. Vols. I. and II.

For the year 1895-1896.

For the year 1895-1896.

22. The Lyon in Mourning. Vol. III.

22. The Lyon in Mourning. Vol. III.

23. Itinerary of Prince Charles Edward (Supplement to the Lyon in Mourning). Compiled by W. B. Blaikie.

23. Prince Charles Edward's Itinerary (Supplement to the Lyon in Mourning). Compiled by W.B. Blaikie.

24. Extracts from the Presbytery Records of Inverness and Dingwall from 1638 to 1688. Edited by William Mackay.

24. Extracts from the Presbytery Records of Inverness and Dingwall from 1638 to 1688. Edited by William Mackay.

25. Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies (continued) for the years 1648 and 1649. Edited by the Rev. Professor Mitchell, D.D., and Rev. James Christie, D.D.

25. Records of the General Assembly Commissions (continued) for the years 1648 and 1649. Edited by Rev. Professor Mitchell, D.D., and Rev. James Christie, D.D.

[Pg 5]

[Pg 5]

For the year 1896-1897.

For the year 1896-1897.

26. Wariston’s Diary and other Papers

Wariston’s Diary and Other Papers—

Johnston of Wariston’s Diary, 1639. Edited by G. M. Paul.—The Honours of Scotland, 1651-52. C. R. A. Howden.—The Earl of Mar’s Legacies, 1722, 1726. Hon. S. Erskine.—Letters by Mrs. Grant of Laggan. J. R. N. Macphail.

Johnston of Wariston's Diary, 1639. Edited by G. M. Paul.—The Honors of Scotland, 1651-52. C. R. A. Howden.—The Earl of Mar's Legacies, 1722, 1726. Hon. S. Erskine.—Letters from Mrs. Grant of Laggan. J. R. N. Macphail.

Presented to the Society by Messrs. T. and A. Constable.

Presented to the Society by T. and A. Constable.

27. Memorials of John Murray of Broughton, 1740-1747. Edited by R. Fitzroy Bell.

27. Memorials of John Murray of Broughton, 1740-1747. Edited by R. Fitzroy Bell.

28. The Compt Buik of David Wedderburne, Merchant of Dundee, 1587-1630. Edited by A. H. Millar.

28. The Ledger of David Wedderburn, Merchant of Dundee, 1587-1630. Edited by A. H. Millar.

For the year 1897-1898.

For the year 1897-1898.

29, 30. The Correspondence of De Montereul and the brothers De Bellièvre, French Ambassadors in England and Scotland, 1645-1648. Edited, with Translation, by J. G. Fotheringham. 2 vols.

29, 30. The Letters of De Montereul and the Bellièvre Brothers, French Ambassadors in England and Scotland, 1645-1648. Edited, with Translation, by J.G. Fotheringham. 2 vols.

For the year 1898-1899.

For the year 1898-1899.

31. Scotland and the Protectorate. Letters and Papers relating to the Military Government of Scotland, from January 1654 to June 1659. Edited by C. H. Firth, M.A.

31. Scotland and the Protectorate. Letters and documents related to the Military Government of Scotland, from January 1654 to June 1659. Edited by C.H. Firth, M.A.

32. Papers illustrating the History of the Scots Brigade in the Service of the United Netherlands, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. I. 1572-1697.

32. Documents presenting the History of the Scots Brigade in the Service of the United Netherlands, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. I. 1572-1697.

33, 34. Macfarlane’s Genealogical Collections concerning Families in Scotland; Manuscripts in the Advocates’ Library. 2 vols. Edited by J. T. Clark, Keeper of the Library.

33, 34. Macfarlane’s Genealogical Collections on Families in Scotland; Manuscripts in the Advocates’ Library. 2 volumes. Edited by J.T. Clark, Librarian.

Presented to the Society by the Trustees of the late Sir William Fraser, K.C.B.

Presented to the Society by the Trustees of the late Sir William Fraser, K.C.B.

For the year 1899-1900.

For the 1899-1900 year.

35. Papers on the Scots Brigade in Holland, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. II. 1698-1782.

35. Papers about the Scots Brigade in Holland, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. II. 1698-1782.

36. Journal of a Foreign Tour in 1665 and 1666, etc., by Sir John Lauder, Lord Fountainhall. Edited by Donald Crawford.

36. Journal of a Trip Abroad in 1665 and 1666, etc., by Sir John Lauder, Lord Fountainhall. Edited by Donald Crawford.

37. Papal Negotiations with Mary Queen of Scots during her Reign in Scotland. Chiefly from the Vatican Archives. Edited by the Rev. J. Hungerford Pollen, S.J.

37. Papal Negotiations with Mary Queen of Scots During Her Rule in Scotland. Mainly from the Vatican Archives. Edited by the Rev. J. Hungerford Pollen, S.J.

For the year 1900-1901.

For the year 1900-1901.

38. Papers on the Scots Brigade in Holland, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. III.

38. Documents about the Scots Brigade in Holland, 1572-1782. Edited by James Ferguson. Vol. III.

39. The Diary of Andrew Hay of Craignethan, 1659-60. Edited by A. G. Reid, F.S.A.Scot.

39. The Diary of Andrew Hay of Craignethan, 1659-60. Edited by A. G. Reid, F.S.A.Scot.

For the year 1901-1902.

For 1901-1902.

40. Negotiations for the Union of England and Scotland in 1651-53. Edited by C. Sanford Terry.

40. Negotiations for the union of England and Scotland from 1651 to 1653. Edited by C. Sanford Terry.

41. The Loyall Dissuasive. Written in 1703 by Sir Æneas Macpherson. Edited by the Rev. A. D. Murdoch.

41. The Loyal Discounter. Written in 1703 by Sir Aeneas Macpherson. Edited by the Rev. A.D. Murdoch.

[Pg 6]

[Pg 6]

For the year 1902-1903.

For the year 1902-1903.

42. The Chartulary of Lindores, 1195-1479. Edited by the Right Rev. John Dowden, D.D., Bishop of Edinburgh.

42. The Lindores Chartulary, 1195-1479. Edited by the Right Rev. John Dowden, D.D., Bishop of Edinburgh.

43. A Letter from Mary Queen of Scots to the Duke of Guise, Jan. 1562. Reproduced in Facsimile. Edited by the Rev. J. Hungerford Pollen, S.J.

43. A Letter from Mary, Queen of Scots, to the Duke of Guise, Jan. 1562. Reproduced in Facsimile. Edited by the Rev. J. Hungerford Pollen, S.J.

Presented to the Society by the family of the late Mr. Scott, of Halkshill.

Presented to the Society by the family of the late Mr. Scott of Halkshill.

44. Miscellany of the Scottish History Society, Second Volume.—The Scottish King’s Household, 14th Century. Edited by Mary Bateson.—The Scottish Nation in the University of Orleans, 1336-1538. John Kirkpatrick, LL.D.—The French Garrison at Dunbar, 1563. Robert S. Rait.—De Antiquitate Religionis apud Scotos, 1594. Henry D. G. Law.—Apology for William Maitland of Lethington, 1610. Andrew Lang.—Letters of Bishop George Græme, 1602-38. L. G. Græme.—A Scottish Journie, 1641. C. H. Firth.—Narratives illustrating the Duke of Hamilton’s Expedition to England, 1648. C. H. Firth.—Burnet-Leighton Papers, 1648-168-. H. C. Foxcroft.—Papers of Robert Erskine, Physician to Peter the Great, 1677-1720. Rev. Robert Paul.—Will of the Duchess of Albany, 1789. A. Francis Steuart.

44. Collection of the Scottish History Society, Second Volume.—The Scottish King's Household, 14th Century. Edited by Mary Bateson.—The Scottish Nation at the University of Orleans, 1336-1538. John Kirkpatrick, LL.D.—The French Garrison at Dunbar, 1563. Robert S. Rait.—On the Antiquity of Religion Among the Scots, 1594. Henry D. G. Law.—Apology for William Maitland of Lethington, 1610. Andrew Lang.—Letters of Bishop George Græme, 1602-1638. L. G. Græme.—A Scottish Journey, 1641. C. H. Firth.—Stories about the Duke of Hamilton’s Expedition to England, 1648. C. H. Firth.—Burnet-Leighton Papers, 1648-1680. H. C. Foxcroft.—Robert Erskine's Papers, Physician to Peter the Great, 1677-1720. Rev. Robert Paul.—Will of the Duchess of Albany, 1789. A. Francis Steuart.

45. Letters of John Cockburn of Ormistoun to his Gardener, 1727-1743. Edited by James Colville, D.Sc.

45. Letters from John Cockburn of Ormistoun to his Gardener, 1727-1743. Edited by James Colville, D.Sc.

For the year 1903-1904.

For the year 1903-1904.

46. Minute Book of the Managers of the New Mills Cloth Manufactory, 1681-1690. Edited by W. R. Scott.

46. Minute Book of the Managers of the New Mills Cloth Manufactory, 1681-1690. Edited by W. R. Scott.

47. Chronicles of the Frasers; being the Wardlaw Manuscript entitled ‘Polichronicon seu Policratica Temporum, or, the true Genealogy of the Frasers.’ By Master James Fraser. Edited by William Mackay.

47. Fraser Chronicles the Wardlaw Manuscript called ‘Polichronicon or the true Genealogy of the Frasers.’ By Master James Fraser. Edited by William Mackay.

48. Proceedings of the Justiciary Court from 1661 to 1678. Vol. I. 1661-1669. Edited by Sheriff Scott-Moncrieff.

48. Records of the Justiciary Court from 1661 to 1678. Vol. I. 1661-1669. Edited by Sheriff Scott-Moncrieff.

For the year 1904-1905.

For the 1904-1905 year.

49. Proceedings of the Justiciary Court from 1661 to 1678. Vol. II. 1669-1678. Edited by Sheriff Scott-Moncrieff.

49. Records of the Justiciary Court from 1661 to 1678. Vol. II. 1669-1678. Edited by Sheriff Scott-Moncrieff.

50. Records of the Baron Court of Stitchill, 1655-1807. Edited by Clement B. Gunn, M.D., Peebles.

50. Records from the Baron Court of Stitchill, 1655-1807. Edited by Clement B. Gunn, M.D., Peebles.

51. Macfarlane’s Geographical Collections. Vol. I. Edited by Sir Arthur Mitchell, K.C.B.

51. Macfarlane’s Geographic Collections. Vol. I. Edited by Sir Arthur Mitchell, K.C.B.

For the year 1905-1906.

For the year 1905-1906.

52, 53. Macfarlane’s Geographical Collections. Vols. II. and III. Edited by Sir Arthur Mitchell, K.C.B.

52, 53. Macfarlane's Geography Collections. Vols. II. and III. Edited by Sir Arthur Mitchell, K.C.B.

54. Statuta Ecclesiæ Scoticanæ, 1225-1559. Translated and edited by David Patrick, LL.D.

54. Statutes of the Scottish Church, 1225-1559. Translated and edited by David Patrick, LL.D.

[Pg 7]

[Pg 7]

For the year 1906-1907.

For the year 1906-1907.

55. The House Booke of Accomps, Ochtertyre, 1737-39. Edited by James Colville, D.Sc.

55. The House Book of Accounts, Ochtertyre, 1737-39. Edited by James Colville, D.Sc.

(Oct. 1907.)

(Oct. 1907.)

56. The Charters of the Abbey of Inchaffray. Edited by W. A. Lindsay, K.C., the Right Rev. Bishop Dowden, D.D., and J. Maitland Thomson, LL.D.

56. The Charters of Inchaffray Abbey. Edited by W.A. Lindsay, K.C., the Right Rev. Bishop Dowden, D.D., and J. Maitland Thomson, LL.D.

(Feb. 1908.)

(Feb. 1908.)

57. A Selection of the Forfeited Estates Papers preserved in H.M. General Register House and elsewhere. Edited by A. H. Millar, LL.D.

57. A Collection of the Forfeited Estates Documents kept in H.M. General Register House and other locations. Edited by A.H. Millar, LL.D.

(Oct. 1909.)

(Oct. 1909.)

For the year 1907-1908.

For the 1907-1908 year.

58. Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies (continued), for the years 1650-52. Edited by the Rev. James Christie, D.D.

58. Records of the Commissions of the General Assemblies (continued), for the years 1650-52. Edited by the Rev. James Christie, D.D.

(Feb. 1909.)

(Feb. 1909.)

59. Papers relating to the Scots in Poland. Edited by A. Francis Steuart.

59. Information about the Scots in Poland. Edited by A. Francis Steuart.

(Nov. 1915.)

(Nov. 1915.)

For the year 1908-1909.

For the 1908-1909 year.

60. Sir Thomas Craig’s De Unione Regnorum Britanniæ Tractatus. Edited, with an English Translation, by C. Sanford Terry.

60. Sir Thomas Craig’s Treatise on the Union of the Kingdoms of Britain. Edited, with an English Translation, by C. Sanford Terry.

(Nov. 1909.)

(Nov. 1909.)

61. Johnston of Wariston’s Memento Quamdiu Vivas, and Diary from 1632 to 1639. Edited by G. M. Paul, LL.D., D.K.S.

61. Johnston of Wariston’s Memento Quamdiu Vivas and Diary from 1632 to 1639. Edited by G.M. Paul, LL.D., D.K.S.

(May 1911.)

(May 1911.)

Second Series.

Second Series.

For the year 1909-1910.

For the year 1909-1910.

1. The Household Book of Lady Grisell Baillie, 1692-1733. Edited by R. Scott-Moncrieff, W.S.

1. The Household Book of Lady Grisell Baillie, 1692-1733. Edited by R. Scott-Moncrieff, W.S.

(Oct. 1911.)

(Oct. 1911.)

2. Origins of the ’45 and other Narratives. Edited by W. B. Blaikie, LL.D.

2. Origins of the '45 and Other Stories. Edited by W.B. Blaikie, LL.D.

(March 1916.)

(March 1916.)

3. Correspondence of James, fourth Earl of Findlater and first Earl of Seafield, Lord Chancellor of Scotland. Edited by James Grant, M.A., LL.B.

3. Correspondence of James, the fourth Earl of Findlater and the first Earl of Seafield, Lord Chancellor of Scotland. Edited by James Grant, M.A., LL.B.

(March 1912.)

(March 1912.)

For the year 1910-1911.

For the year 1910-1911.

4. Rentale Sancti Andree; being Chamberlain and Granitar Accounts of the Archbishopric in the time of Cardinal Betoun, 1538-1546. Translated and edited by Robert Kerr Hannay.

4. The Accounts of St. Andrew's, including the Chamberlain and Granitar Accounts of the Archbishopric during Cardinal Beaton's period, 1538-1546. Translated and edited by Robert Kerr Hannay.

(February 1913.)

(February 1913.)

5. Highland Papers. Vol. I. Edited by J. R. N. Macphail, K.C.

5. Highland Papers. Vol. I. Edited by J.R.N. Macphail, K.C.

(May 1914.)

(May 1914.)

For the year 1911-1912.

For the year 1911-1912.

6. Selections from the Records of the Regality of Melrose. Vol. I. Edited by C. S. Romanes, C.A.

6. Excerpts from the Records of the Regality of Melrose. Vol. I. Edited by C.S. Romanes, C.A.

(November 1914.)

(November 1914.)

7. Records of the Earldom of Orkney. Edited by J. S. Clouston.

7. Records of the Earldom of Orkney. Edited by J.S. Clouston.

(December 1914.)

(December 1914.)

[Pg 8]

[Pg 8]

For the year 1912-1913.

For the year 1912-1913.

8. Selections from the Records of the Regality of Melrose. Vol. II. Edited by C. S. Romanes, C.A.

8. Excerpts from the Records of the Melrose Regality. Vol. II. Edited by C.S. Romanes, C.A.

(January 1915).

(Jan 1915).

9. Selections from the Letter Books of John Steuart, Bailie of Inverness. Edited by William Mackay, LL.D.

9. Excerpts from the Letter Books of John Steuart, Bailie of Inverness. Edited by William Mackay, LL.D.

(April 1915.)

(April 1915.)

For the year 1913-1914.

For the year 1913-1914.

10. Rentale Dunkeldense; being the Accounts of the Chamberlain of the Bishopric of Dunkeld, a.d. 1506-1517. Edited by R. K. Hannay.

10. Rental of Dunkeld; containing the Accounts of the Chamberlain of the Bishopric of Dunkeld, a.d. 1506-1517. Edited by R.K. Hannay.

(March 1915.)

(March 1915.)

11. Letters of the Earl of Seafield and Others, illustrative of the History of Scotland during the Reign of Queen Anne. Edited by Professor Hume Brown.

11. Letters from the Earl of Seafield and others, offering insight into the history of Scotland during Queen Anne's reign. Edited by Professor Hume Brown.

(Nov. 1915.)

(Nov. 1915.)

For the year 1914-1915.

For the year 1914-1915.

12. Highland Papers. Vol. II. Edited by J. R. N. Macphail, K.C.

12. Highland Papers. Vol. II. Edited by J.R.N. Macphail, K.C.

(March 1916.)

(March 1916.)

(Note.Origins of the ’45, issued for 1909-1910, is issued also for 1914-1915.)

(Note.Origins of '45, published for 1909-1910, is also published for 1914-1915.)

For the year 1915-1916.

For the 1915-1916 year.

13. Selections from the Records of the Regality of Melrose. Vol. III. Edited by C. S. Romanes, C.A.

13. Selections from the Records of the Melrose Regality. Vol. III. Edited by C. S. Romans, C.A.

14. Johnston of Wariston’s Diary. Vol. II. Edited by D. Hay Fleming, LL.D.

14. Johnston of Wariston’s journal. Vol. II. Edited by D. Hay Fleming, LL.D.

In preparation.

Coming soon.

Bibliography of Topographical Works relating to Scotland. Compiled by the late Sir Arthur Mitchell, and edited by C. G. Cash.

Bibliography of Topographical Works about Scotland. Compiled by the late Sir Arthur Mitchell, and edited by C. G. Cash.

Records relating to the Scottish Armies from 1638 to 1650. Edited by Professor C. Sanford Terry.

Records about the Scottish Armies from 1638 to 1650. Edited by Professor C. Sanford Terry.

Seafield Correspondence. Vol. II. Edited by Major James Grant.

Seafield Correspondence. Vol. II. Edited by Major James Grant.

Register of the Consultations of the Ministers of Edinburgh, and some other Brethren of the Ministry, since the interruption of the Assembly 1653, with other Papers of public concernment. Edited by the Rev. W. Stephen, B.D.

Record of the Discussions of the Ministers of Edinburgh and some other Members of the Ministry since the Assembly's break in 1653, along with other documents of public interest. Edited by the Rev. W. Stephen, B.D.

Miscellany of the Scottish History Society. Third Volume.

Collection of the Scottish History Society. Volume Three.

Charters and Documents relating to the Grey Friars and the Cistercian Nunnery of Haddington.—Register of Inchcolm Monastery. Edited by J. G. Wallace-James, M.B.

Charters and documents related to the Grey Friars and the Cistercian Nunnery of Haddington. — Register of Inchcolm Monastery. Edited by J.G. Wallace-James, M.B.

Analytical Catalogue of the Wodrow Collection of Manuscripts in the Advocates’ Library. Edited by J. T. Clark.

Analytical Catalogue of the Wodrow Collection of Manuscripts in the Advocates' Library. Edited by J.T. Clark.

A Translation of the Historia Abbatum de Kynlos of Ferrerius.

A Translation of the History of the Abbots of Kynlos by Ferrerius.

Papers relating to the Rebellions of 1715 and 1745, with other documents from the Municipal Archives of the City of Perth.

Documents related to the 1715 and 1745 rebellions, along with other files from the Municipal Archives of the City of Perth.

The Balcarres Papers.

The Balcarres Papers.


Transcriber’s Notes

Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected. Variations in hyphenation and accents have been standardised but all other spelling and punctuation remains unchanged.

Obvious typos have been quietly fixed. Variations in hyphenation and accents have been standardized, but all other spelling and punctuation stays the same.

The Corrigenda and Errata (page vi) have been corrected in place.

The corrections and errors (page vi) have been fixed.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!