This is a modern-English version of Beautiful shells : Their nature, structure, and uses familiarly explained; with directions for collecting, cleaning, and arranging them in the cabinet; descriptions of the most remarkable species, and of the creatures which inhabit them; and explanations of the meanings of their scientific names, and of the terms used in conchology, originally written by Adams, H. G. (Henry Gardiner). It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

[i]

[i]

BEAUTIFUL SHELLS:

Gorgeous shells:

THEIR NATURE, STRUCTURE, AND USES
FAMILIARLY EXPLAINED;

Their nature, structure, and uses
Easily explained;

WITH DIRECTIONS FOR
COLLECTING, CLEANING, AND ARRANGING THEM
IN THE CABINET;

WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR
COLLECTING, CLEANING, AND ORGANIZING THEM
IN THE CABINET;

DESCRIPTIONS OF
THE MOST REMARKABLE SPECIES,
AND OF THE CREATURES WHICH INHABIT THEM;

DESCRIPTIONS OF
THE MOST AMAZING SPECIES,
AND OF THE CREATURES THAT LIVE IN THEM;

AND EXPLANATIONS OF
THE MEANINGS OF THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAMES,
AND OF
THE TERMS USED IN CONCHOLOGY.

AND EXPLANATIONS OF
THE MEANINGS OF THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAMES,
AND OF
THE TERMS USED IN CONCHOLOGY.

BY H. G. ADAMS,
Author of “Nests and Eggs of Familiar British Birds,” “Beautiful Butterflies,”
“Favourite Song Birds,” “A Story of the Seasons,” &c. &c.

BY H.G. ADAMS,
Author of “Nests and Eggs of Common British Birds,” “Beautiful Butterflies,”
“Favorite Songbirds,” “A Story of the Seasons,” and more.

ILLUSTRATED WITH NUMEROUS ENGRAVINGS & COLOURED PLATES.

ILLUSTRATED WITH MANY ENGravings & COLOURED PLATES.

LONDON:
GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATERNOSTER ROW.
M DCCC LVI.

LONDON:
GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATERNOSTER ROW.
1856.

[ii]

[ii]


[iii]

[iii]

INTRODUCTION.

WHAT ARE SHELLS?

Dr. Johnson gives us no less than eight different meanings for the word Shell. First, he calls it ‘The hard covering of anything; the external crust.’ Second, ‘The covering of a testaceous or crustaceous animal.’ And here we may stop, for this is just the signification which has to do with our subject; so let us turn the sentence inside out, and see what we can make of it. We all know what a covering is—an outer coat, a case, a protection from injury, a husk, a crust, a—in short, a shell,—scyll or scell, as our Saxon forefathers called it; schale, as the Germans now term it. No Latin nor Greek here, but the good old Saxon tongue, somewhat rough and rugged, perhaps, but stout and sturdy, and honest and serviceable; a kind of language to stand wear and tear, like a pair of hob-nailed shoes, with little polish, but useful, yes, very useful! Well, we have got so far, now comes a hard word—Tes-ta-ce-ous, what can it mean? It is pronounced tes-ta-shus, comes from the Latin testaceus—having a Shell, and means consisting of, or composed of shells; so we find that a testacean is a shell-fish, and testaceology is the science of shells. Johnson’s second meaning of the word testaceous is ‘Having continuous, not jointed shells, opposed to crustaceous.’ So we find that some naturalists call those testaceous fish, “whose strong and thick shells are entire and of a piece, because those which are joined, as the lobsters, are crustaceous.”

Dr. Johnson provides eight different meanings for the word Shell. First, he defines it as ‘The hard covering of anything; the outer layer.’ Second, he describes it as ‘The covering of a shellfish or crustacean.’ We can pause here since this is the meaning relevant to our topic. Let’s flip the sentence around and see what we can derive from it. We all understand what a covering is—an outer layer, a case, a protection from damage, a husk, a crust—a shell, essentially, scyll or scell, as our Saxon ancestors referred to it; schale, as the Germans now call it. No Latin or Greek here, just the sturdy old Saxon language, which may be a bit rough around the edges, but it’s solid, honest, and practical; a type of language that endures wear and tear, like a pair of durable shoes, not fancy but definitely useful! Now, we’ve come this far, and here comes a tricky term—Testaceous, what does it mean? It’s pronounced tes-ta-shus, comes from the Latin testaceus—meaning having a shell, and refers to something made up of or containing shells; thus, we see that a testacean is a shellfish, and testaceology is the study of shells. Johnson’s second definition of the word testaceous is ‘Having continuous, unjoined shells, in contrast to crustaceous.’ Consequently, some naturalists refer to testaceous animals as those whose strong, thick shells are whole and undivided, unlike the joined shells of crustaceans like lobsters.

Now some of the true testacean have shells in more than one or two pieces, and therefore this last explanation of the term is rather calculated to mislead a learner; but we shall explain presently wherein the difference consists between them, and the Crus-ta-ce-ous, or, as we pronounce it, krus-ta-shus, fish consists. Here is another long word, it comes from the Latin crusta, a word of many meanings, all having reference to an outer coat or covering. My readers know all about pie-crust, and have perhaps heard a[iv] surly, snappish, peevish person called a crusty fellow; they will now understand what is meant by a crustacean and crustaceology, that part of Zoology which treats of crustaceous animals. They constitute quite a large family, these ologies, and have a strange way of twisting themselves about, and exchanging limbs and features, so that one is puzzled at times to tell which is which. But here we have fixed two of them, called Testaceology and Crustaceology, twin brothers, and very much alike in their characteristics. Let us have a good look at them, so that we may know them again if we should lose sight of them for awhile. Now we will spell over the name of the first—

Now, some true testaceans have shells made up of more than one or two pieces, so this last explanation of the term could confuse someone learning about it. But we will explain shortly how they differ from the Crustacean, which we pronounce as krus-ta-shus. Here’s another long word; it comes from the Latin crusta, which has several meanings, all related to an outer layer or covering. My readers know about pie crust and might have heard a cranky, irritable person referred to as a crusty fellow; now they will understand what is meant by a crustacean and crustaceology, the branch of Zoology that studies crustacean animals. These ologies make up a large family, and they have a weird way of twisting around and swapping limbs and features, making it sometimes hard to tell them apart. But here we have defined two of them, called Testaceology and Crustacean biology, like twin brothers with very similar characteristics. Let’s take a close look at them so we can recognize them again if we lose track for a while. Now let’s spell out the name of the first—

CONCHOLOGY.

Why, it is changed already? Has this science of shells then another name? Yes, and this is it, pronounced kong-kol-o-gy, and derived from the Latin concha, which means properly a shell-fish with two shells, joined by a hinge, as the oyster, the cockle, etc. This present volume then is a work on Conchology, the subject of it is Conchiferous, and whoever studies it will be doing something towards becoming a Conchologist.

Why has it already changed? Does this science of shells have another name? Yes, it does—it's pronounced kong-kol-o-gy and comes from the Latin word concha, which refers to a shellfish with two shells connected by a hinge, like an oyster, a cockle, etc. This volume is about Conchology, its topic is Conchiferous, and anyone who studies it will be on their way to becoming a Conchologist.

So much for names and titles; but still we have the question to answer, What are shells? In a learned work called a Cyclopædia, we find it stated that “shell is the hard calcareous (that is chalky) substance which protects, either partially or entirely, the testaceous mollusks externally, or supports certain of them internally.” All this you will understand, except perhaps the word ‘mollusks;’ this is a term applied to soft-bodied animals, such as shell-fish, snails, etc., about which we shall have more to say as we proceed. By this we learn that all shells are not external or outer coverings, some are internal or inner supports for the soft, jelly-like bodies to which they belong, thus performing the duty of bones. An example of this is seen in the shell of the Cuttle Fish, called by naturalists Sepia, a description of which will be found further on in the book.

So much for names and titles; but we still need to answer the question: What are shells? In a scholarly work called a Cyclopædia, it's stated that “a shell is the hard calcareous (or chalky) substance that protects, either partially or completely, the testaceous mollusks externally or supports some of them internally.” You’ll probably understand all of this, except maybe the term ‘mollusks’; this refers to soft-bodied animals, like shellfish and snails, which we will discuss more as we go along. From this, we learn that not all shells are outer coverings; some serve as internal supports for the soft, jelly-like bodies they belong to, acting like bones. An example of this is found in the shell of the Cuttle Fish, referred to by scientists as Sepia, which will be described further on in the book.

Shells are either Crystalline or Granular. Now look at those two words, they almost explain their own meaning. Crystalline shells are those which have more or less of clearness, transparency as we say, so that if held against the light it shews through them; they are sometimes called Porcellaneous shells, from their resemblance in this respect to porcelain, or chinaware; the Common Cowry, (Cypræa Tigris,) is a shell of this description.

Shells are either Crystalline or Granular. If you look at those two words, they almost explain themselves. Crystalline shells have some level of clarity and transparency, meaning that if you hold them up to the light, you can see through them; they are sometimes referred to as Porcellaneous shells because they resemble porcelain or chinaware in this way. The Common Cowry, (Cypræa Tigris), is a shell of this type.

Granular, or, as they are sometimes called, Concretionary shells, are the most hard and compact; it is in these that the substance[v] called nacre, or mother-of-pearl, is mostly found. One of the commonest examples is the oyster shell; if broken across it will be seen to consist of very thin plates, or laminæ, as they are termed, closely packed together. The thinner these laminæ may be the more lustrous and beautiful appears the lining of the shell; that shifting play of colours which we call iridescent, from iris—the rainbow, is then brightest and most noticeable. A very remarkable substance is this mother-of-pearl; smooth, and shining, and delicately-tinted. Who would expect to find such a beautiful lining to the rugged, rough, dingy-looking oyster, or mussel shell? Truly these mollusks, some of them, live in gorgeous palaces. And the most curious part of the matter is that from the fluids or juices, of their own bodies, and from the chalky matter collected from the water, they are enabled to secrete or deposit such wonderfully-constructed habitations, which after all are little more than chalk. Burn a heap of oyster shells, or any other testaceous coverings, and you get lime the same as that produced by burning the white lumps from the chalk-pit, which lumps, by the way, are said to be composed wholly, or for the most part, of marine shells. This we should call cretaceous matter, from creta, which is the Latin for chalk, or calcerous, from calcis—lime. Granular shells you have been told are sometimes called concretionary, this is because they contain a large amount of this chalky deposit. The rock called limestone, geologists tell us, is composed entirely of fossil shells and mud, or what was once mud, dried and hardened, most likely by extreme heat, to the consistence of rock. Wonderful this to think of; huge mountains, and mighty masses, and far-stretching strata, forming a large portion of the crust of the earth, made up chiefly of the coverings of fishes, a great portion of them so small as to be scarcely visible to the naked eye.—Truly wonderful! But we shall have more to say upon this head when we come to speak of Fossil Shells, as well as on the subject of Pearls, in our chapter on the fish in whose shells they are chiefly found.

Granular, or sometimes referred to as concretionary shells, are the hardest and most compact. It's in these that the substance[v] known as nacre, or mother-of-pearl, is primarily found. One of the most common examples is the oyster shell; when broken open, it reveals a structure made up of very thin layers, or laminæ, tightly packed together. The thinner these layers are, the more lustrous and beautiful the inner lining of the shell appears; that shifting play of colors we call iridescent, from iris—the rainbow, is then most vivid and noticeable. This mother-of-pearl is an extraordinary substance; it’s smooth, shiny, and delicately colored. Who would expect to find such a beautiful lining inside the rough, dull-looking oyster or mussel shell? Truly, some of these mollusks reside in beautiful homes. Interestingly, from the fluids or juices in their own bodies, along with chalky materials collected from the water, they can secrete or deposit these wonderfully constructed habitats, which are essentially just chalk. Burn a pile of oyster shells, or any other shell coverings, and you get lime similar to that produced by burning the white lumps from a chalk pit, which, by the way, are said to be mostly composed of marine shells. We would call this cretaceous matter, from creta, the Latin for chalk, or calcerous, from calcis—lime. Granular shells, as you've been told, are sometimes called concretionary because they contain a large amount of this chalky deposit. The rock known as limestone, according to geologists, is entirely made up of fossil shells and mud—or what was once mud—dried and hardened, likely by intense heat, into a rock-like consistency. It's amazing to think about; massive mountains and extensive layers forming a significant part of the Earth's crust are mainly made up of fish coverings, many of which are so small they can barely be seen with the naked eye. Truly amazing! But we'll have more to say on this topic when we discuss Fossil Shells, as well as Pearls, in our chapter about the fish whose shells they are primarily found in.

It has been a matter of dispute with naturalists whether the testaceous mollusks have shells at all before they issue from the egg, and the main evidence favours the opinion that, generally speaking, they do possess what may be considered as a kind of pattern or model of the habitation which they are to build. This appears to be of a pale horn-colour, and destitute of any markings; but as soon as the animal enters upon an independent state of existence, it begins to assume its distinctive shape and colour, gradually increasing with the growth of its living tenant, and becoming more and more decidedly marked, until it attains its full perfection of testacean development. Thus the age of some[vi] shell-fish can be at once determined by the peculiar conformation and markings of the shell.

It has been a topic of debate among naturalists whether shellfish have shells before they hatch from the egg, and the main evidence suggests that, in general, they do have something like a model or framework of the shell they will create. This seems to be a light horn color and lacks any markings; however, once the animal starts living independently, it begins to take on its characteristic shape and color, gradually growing as its living occupant increases, and becoming more and more distinctly marked until it reaches the complete form of testacean development. Therefore, the age of some[vi] shellfish can be immediately identified by the unique shape and patterns of the shell.

The relative portions of animal and earthy, or rather chalky matter, which compose these shells, varies considerably in different kinds; in those called Crystalline or Porcellaneous, the animal deposit is much less than in the granular or concretionary shells, where it not only constitutes a large part of the whole substance, but is more dense, that is thick, and also has the appearance of being membraneous, or organized matter. We can perhaps best explain this by saying that whereas the different chalky layers of the crystalline shell seem merely glued together by the intervening animal fluid; those of the granular shell, as the oyster, appear to be connected by interlacing membranes. But all this my readers will learn more about from more advanced and scientific works if they proceed, as I trust they will do, in the study of Conchology, a science which has in a greater or less degree attracted the attention of curious and contemplative minds in all ages, and the study of which it has been well said is peculiarly adapted to recreate the senses, and insensibly to lead us to the contemplation of the glory of God in creation.

The relative amounts of animal and earthy, or rather chalky, material in these shells vary significantly among different types. In shells known as Crystalline or Porcellaneous, the animal part is much less than in the granular or concretionary shells, where it not only makes up a large portion of the entire substance but is also denser, meaning thicker, and has the look of being membranous or organized matter. We can best explain this by saying that while the different chalky layers of the crystalline shell seem just glued together by the animal fluid in between, the layers of the granular shell, like that of an oyster, seem to be connected by interwoven membranes. However, all of this will be further explored by my readers in more advanced and scientific works if they continue, as I hope they will, in the study of Shell collecting, a science that has captured the attention of curious and thoughtful minds throughout history, and it has been rightly said that its study is particularly suited to refresh the senses and subtly leads us to contemplate the glory of God in creation.

BEAUTY AND VALUE OF SHELLS.

In shells, as in all the works of the Almighty Creator, we may observe an infinite variety of form, and if they do not all strike us as alike graceful, yet in each, however plain and simple, there is some peculiar beauty, whether it be the mere hollow cup, or the simple tube, the smooth or twisted cone, the slender spire, the convoluted oval, or half circle, ribbed or spiked, with a lip curving out like the leaf of a water lily, or a narrow rim, like that of a golden chalice; they are indeed elegant, each perfect of its kind, and bearing the impress of a constructive skill far above that of man, who copies from them some of the most graceful and elegant designs wherewith to ornament his buildings, and shapes in which to fashion his articles of luxury or utility.

In shells, just like in all the creations of the Almighty Creator, we can see an endless variety of shapes. While they may not all seem equally graceful to us, each one, no matter how plain or simple, has its unique beauty. It could be a simple hollow cup, a straightforward tube, a smooth or twisted cone, a slender spire, a wavy oval, a half-circle, ribbed or spiked, with a lip that curves out like a water lily leaf or a narrow edge like that of a golden chalice. Each shell is indeed elegant, perfect in its own way, and reflects a level of craftsmanship far beyond that of humans, who take inspiration from these forms to create some of the most graceful and sophisticated designs for their buildings and to shape their luxury or utility items.

The most beautiful scroll-work of marble chimney-pieces, cornices of rooms, and other enriched portions of both public and private structures, are those in which the forms of shells have been taken for the patterns of the artistic designs; and how tasteful and appropriate is the employment of the shells themselves as ornaments for the mantle-piece, side-board, and chiffonniere. Then too,

The most beautiful carvings on marble chimneys, room cornices, and other decorative parts of both public and private buildings are those that use shell shapes as the patterns for their designs; and how stylish and fitting it is to use actual shells as decorations for the mantel, sideboard, and chest of drawers. Then too,

“The rainbow-tinted shell, which lies
Miles deep at bottom of the sea, hath all
Colours of skies, and flowers, and gems, and plants.”

[vii]

[vii]

Not only has it grace and elegance of form, but it has also richness, and delicacy, and variety of colouring. In some species the tints are intensely vivid as the shifting lights of the aurora borealis, or the glowing hues of an autumnal sunset; in others pale and delicate as the first indications of coming morn, or the scarcely-perceptible tinge of a just expanding flower-bud; in some the colours are arranged in patterns, regularly disposed; in others, in masses and blotches, of varying shapes and degrees of intensity; in some again they seem to change and melt one into the other, like the prismatic hues of the rainbow. In all, whether distinct and unconnected, or intimately blended, whether regular or irregular, they are beautiful exceedingly. Nor is their beauty of an evanescent, that is fading, or vanishing character; unlike plants and animals, which when once dead, are extremely difficult of preservation. Shells, being composed of particles already in natural combination, are almost indestructible; unless exposed to the action of fire, or some powerful acid, they will remain the same for ages, requiring no care or attention, beyond occasionally removing the dust, which would collect upon and defile their pearly whiteness, or obscure the brilliancy of their colours.

Not only do they have grace and an elegant shape, but they also boast richness, delicacy, and a variety of colors. In some species, the colors are as intensely vivid as the shifting lights of the aurora borealis or the warm shades of an autumn sunset; in others, they're pale and delicate, like the first signs of dawn or the barely noticeable hue of a blooming flower bud. In some, the colors are arranged in regular patterns; in others, they're in masses and blotches of different shapes and intensities; and in some, they seem to change and blend into each other, like the prismatic colors of a rainbow. In all cases, whether distinct and separate or closely intertwined, whether regular or irregular, they are incredibly beautiful. Additionally, their beauty isn't fleeting or transient; unlike plants and animals that are difficult to preserve once dead, shells, made from particles already in natural combination, are nearly indestructible. Unless they’re exposed to fire or a strong acid, they will remain the same for ages, requiring minimal care beyond occasionally dusting off the dirt that collects on their pearly surface or diminishes the brightness of their colors.

So easily collected, arranged, and preserved, and withal so singular and graceful in form, and rich and various of tint, one cannot wonder that Shells have always had a conspicuous place in all museums, and other collections of natural history objects; neither can we feel surprised that a high value should have been set upon rare specimens; as much as a thousand pounds it is said has been given for the first discovered specimen of the Venus Dione; another shell called the Conus cedo nulli, is valued at three hundred pounds; and the Turbo scaloris, if large and perfect, is worth one hundred guineas; while the Cypræa aurantium, or Orange Cowry, if it has not a hole beaten through it, will fetch fifty guineas. It has been calculated that a complete collection of British Conchology is worth its weight in silver.

So easily collected, organized, and preserved, and with such a unique and elegant shape, along with a rich variety of colors, it's no surprise that shells have always held a prominent spot in museums and other collections of natural history. It's also understandable that rare specimens are highly valued; it’s rumored that as much as a thousand pounds has been paid for the first discovered specimen of the Venus Dione; another shell known as the Conus cedo nulli is worth three hundred pounds; and the Turbo scaloris, if large and flawless, can be priced at one hundred guineas; while the Cypræa aurantium, or Orange Cowry, if it doesn't have a hole punched through it, can sell for fifty guineas. It has been estimated that a complete collection of British conchology is worth its weight in silver.

The following quotation is from “The Young Conchologist,” by Miss Roberts;—our readers will do well to peruse it attentively:—“We admit that shells are beautiful, and that they are admirably adapted to the exigencies of the wearers; but how shall we account for the endless diversity of shades and colours, varying from the sober coating of the garden snail, to the delicate and glowing tints which are diffused over some of the finer species, in the infinite profusion of undulations, clouds and spots, bands and reticulated figures, with which these admirable architects enrich the walls of their beautiful receptacles. The means of producing them must be sought for in the animals themselves. Their necks are furnished with pores replete with colouring fluid, which blends[viii] insensibly with the calcareous exudation already noticed, and thus occasions that exquisite variety in their testaceous coverings, which art attempts to emulate, but can never fully equal. Thus far is the result of observation and experiment. It now remains to account for the extraordinary fact that the stony exudations of testaceous animals condense only on those parts where they are essential to their welfare. But here investigation ends—the microscope has done its office. It seems as if material nature delighted to baffle the wisdom of her sons, and to say to the proud assertors of the sufficiency of human reason for comprehending the mysteries of creation and of Providence, ‘Thus far can you go, and no farther; even in the formation of a shell, or its insignificant inhabitant, your arrogant pretensions are completely humbled.’”

The following quote is from “The Young Conchologist,” by Miss Roberts; our readers should pay close attention to it: “We acknowledge that shells are beautiful and that they are perfectly suited to the needs of the creatures that have them. But how do we explain the endless variety of shades and colors, ranging from the dull coating of the garden snail to the subtle and vibrant hues found on some of the more exquisite species, in the infinite mix of waves, clouds, spots, bands, and intricate patterns with which these remarkable builders adorn the walls of their lovely homes? The source of this variety must be found within the animals themselves. Their necks have pores filled with coloring fluid that blends[viii] seamlessly with the calcified secretion already mentioned, creating that beautiful array in their shell coverings, which art tries to mimic but can never truly match. This is the outcome of observation and experimentation. Now we must explain the unusual fact that the hard secretions from shell-bearing animals only form in areas crucial for their survival. But this is where the investigation stops—the microscope has done its work. It seems as if nature loves to challenge the understanding of humans and says to those who confidently claim that human reason is enough to grasp the mysteries of creation and Providence, ‘This far you may go, and no further; even in the making of a shell, or its seemingly trivial inhabitant, your lofty claims are thoroughly undermined.’”

USES OF SHELLS.

In speaking of shells as ornaments, and objects worthy of our study and admiration, we have already mentioned some of their uses, for surely that which contributes to the intellectual improvement and innocent pleasure of mankind, is in its degree useful. But on the more narrow ground of utility, shells may also claim a high place in our estimation. To man in a barbarous and uncivilized state, they furnish the means of performing some of the most important operations of daily life, being extensively used as a substitute for iron. The savage frequently forms his knife, his hunting spear, and his fish-hook of hard shell. Lister relates that the inhabitants of Nicaragua, in South America, fasten a shell, called the Ostrea virginica, to a handle of wood, and use it as a spade. In North America the natives use a blue and white belt composed of shells called the Venus mercenaria, as a symbol of peace and unity, and there too the gorget of the chieftain’s war-dress is composed of the pearl-bearing mussel, called by naturalists Mytilus margaritiferus. Many African tribes use the Murex tritonis as a military horn, and a rare variety of this shell, which has the volutions reversed, is held sacred, and used only by the priests. Among the Friendly Islanders the Orange Cowry is a symbol of the highest dignity. The Money Cowry, (Cypræa moneta,) forms the current coin of many nations of Africa; and a certain number of these shells strung together, are considered by the slave-hunting chiefs, as an equivalent for so many black-skinned brothers, whom they sell into hopeless bondage.

In discussing shells as decorations and objects that deserve our attention and admiration, we've already touched on some of their uses, since anything that contributes to people's intellectual growth and enjoyment is, in its own way, valuable. However, in terms of practicality, shells also hold significant value. For people in a primitive and uncivilized state, they provide essential tools for everyday tasks, widely serving as substitutes for metal. People often make knives, hunting spears, and fish hooks from sturdy shells. Lister notes that the people of Nicaragua in South America attach a shell called the Ostrea virginica to a wooden handle, using it as a spade. In North America, native tribes create a blue and white belt from shells known as Venus mercenaria, which symbolizes peace and unity. Additionally, the gorget worn by a chieftain in battle is made from the pearl-bearing mussel, known scientifically as Mytilus margaritiferus. Various African tribes use the Murex tritonis as a military horn, and a rare version of this shell with reversed spirals is considered sacred and is reserved for priests. In the Friendly Islands, the Orange Cowry represents the highest honor. The Money Cowry (Cypræa moneta) serves as currency in several African nations, and a specific number of these shells strung together are viewed by slave-hunting leaders as equivalent to purchasing enslaved individuals.

Among nations, too, in a high state of civilization, shells are often used for economical as well as ornamental purposes. To say nothing of mother-of-pearl, which is converted into so many articles useful as well as pretty, scallop, or oyster shells, are frequently[ix] employed as scoops by druggists, grocers, and the like; and in the country the dairy-maid, with the larger kinds of the same shell, skims her milk, and slices her butter; while sometimes by the poor people of both towns and villages, the deeper specimens are converted into oil lamps. One very important use, my young readers will understand, when I speak of a ragged urchin, who shouts to every passer-by—‘Please remember the grotto!’

Among highly developed nations, shells are often used for both practical and decorative reasons. Leaving aside mother-of-pearl, which is crafted into many useful and attractive items, scallop and oyster shells are commonly used as scoops by pharmacists, grocery store owners, and others; in rural areas, dairy workers use the larger types of these shells to skim milk and slice butter. Sometimes, poorer people in both cities and villages turn the deeper shells into oil lamps. One very important use, as my young readers will understand, comes to mind when I think of a ragged kid who shouts to everyone passing by—‘Please remember the grotto!’

In ancient times, we are told, the people of Athens recorded their votes on public occasions, by marks upon a shell, thus Pope says—

In ancient times, we're told, the people of Athens cast their votes during public events by marking a shell, as Pope says—

“He whom ungrateful Athens would expel,
At all times just, but when he signed the shell;”

in allusion to this custom, of which we are reminded by such English words as Attestation, a certifying, a bearing witness; Testify, to give evidence; Testament, a will, or written disposal of property, etc.; all having their origin, it appears, in the Latin testa—a shell. In ancient poetry we find the word Testudo used to signify a musical instrument, also called a lyre or lute, which instrument, according to tradition, was first made by passing strings, and straining them tightly, over the shell of a tortoise. So the poet Dryden, describing those who listened to the music drawn from this simple invention, says—

in reference to this tradition, which is echoed in English words like Attestation, meaning to certify or bear witness; Testify, meaning to provide evidence; Testament, meaning a will or written declaration of property, etc.; all of which seem to have their roots in the Latin testa—meaning shell. In ancient poetry, the term Testudo is used to refer to a musical instrument, also known as a lyre or lute, which, according to tradition, was originally created by tightly straining strings over a tortoise shell. The poet Dryden, describing those who listened to the music produced by this simple invention, states—

“Less than a God they thought there could not dwell,
Within the hollow of that shell
That spoke so sweetly.”

A Greek writer, called Apollodorus, gives this account of the invention of music by the Egyptian god Hermes, more commonly known as Mercury. The Nile having overflowed its banks, and laid under water the whole country of Egypt, left, when it returned to its usual boundaries, various dead animals on the land; among the rest was a tortoise, the flesh of which being dried and wasted by the sun, nothing remained within the shell except nerves and cartilages, or thin gristly bones; these being shrunk and tightened by the heat, became sonorous, that is sounding. Against this shell Mercury chanced to strike his foot, and pleased by the sound caused thereby, examined the shell from which it came, and so got a notion, as we say, how he might construct a musical instrument. The first which he made was in the form of a tortoise, and strung with the dried sinews of dead animals, even as are the lutes, harps, and fiddles of the present day. This fanciful mode of accounting for the origin of music, is thus alluded to by a writer named Brown:—

A Greek writer named Apollodorus tells the story of how the Egyptian god Hermes, also known as Mercury, invented music. After the Nile flooded and covered all of Egypt, it eventually receded, leaving behind various dead animals on the land. Among them was a tortoise, whose flesh had dried up in the sun, leaving only nerves, cartilage, and thin, gristly bones inside the shell. These shrank and tightened due to the heat, which made them sound when struck. Mercury happened to kick the shell and was intrigued by the sound it made. He then examined the shell and came up with the idea for a musical instrument. The first one he created was shaped like a tortoise and strung with the dried sinews of dead animals, similar to today's lutes, harps, and violins. This imaginative explanation for the origin of music is referenced by a writer named Brown:—

[x]

[x]

“The lute was first devised
In imitation of a tortoise’ back,
Whose sinews parched by Apollo’s beams,
Echoed about the concave of the shell;
And seeing the shortest and smallest gave shrillest sound;
They found out frets, whose sweet diversity
Well touched by the skilful learned fingers,
Roused so strange a multitude of chords.
And the opinion many do confirm,
Because testudo signifies a lute.”

And now we are among the myths and fables of antiquity, we may just mention another application of the shell to musical purposes. Neptune, who, according to the Grecian mythology, was the god of the sea, is frequently represented as going forth in his car in great state and pomp, with a body-guard of Tritons; some of whom go before with twisted conch shells as trumpets, with which we are to suppose they make delightful harmony. Venus, too, the goddess of beauty, rode on the ocean foam in a testaceous car. Thus Dryden says, that Albion—our native land, so called on account of its chalky cliffs, from the Latin alba—white:—

And now that we’re diving into the myths and stories of the past, let's mention another use of the shell for music. Neptune, who in Greek mythology was the god of the sea, is often shown riding in his grand chariot with a guard of Tritons; some of them go ahead blowing twisted conch shells like trumpets, which we can imagine create beautiful music. Venus, the goddess of beauty, also rode on the ocean foam in a shell-shaped chariot. As Dryden says, Albion—our homeland, named for its chalky cliffs, from the Latin alba—white:—

“Was to Neptune recommended;
Peace and plenty spread the sails;
Venus in her shell before him,
From the sands in safety bore him.”

But without believing all these fables, more poetical than true, we may soon convince ourselves that in the hollow chambers of a shell, there does seem to dwell, like an imprisoned spirit, a low sad kind of music. An English poet, named Walter Savage Lander, has well described this in these lines—

But without believing all these stories, which are more poetic than factual, we can quickly convince ourselves that in the empty spaces of a shell, there seems to live, like a trapped spirit, a soft, melancholy kind of music. An English poet named Walter Savage Landor has aptly described this in these lines—

“Of pearly hue
Within, and they that lustre have imbibed
In the sun’s palace porch, where, when unyoked,
His chariot wheel stands midway in the wave;
Shake one, and it awakens; then apply
Its polished lips to your attentive ear,
And it remembers its august abodes,
And murmurs as the ocean murmurs there.”

Wordsworth, too, gives a beautiful description of a child applying one of these pearly musical-boxes to his ear.

Wordsworth also provides a lovely description of a child holding one of these shiny music boxes up to his ear.

Many other uses of shells might be mentioned, to show that they perform an important part in the operations of nature, as the means and modes by and in which God sees fit to order the affairs of this world are frequently called; and also promote the ends of science, and the arts of every-day life. By the decomposition of the shells, of which they are partly composed, solid rocks frequently crumble to pieces, and spreading over a considerable[xi] surface, form a fruitful soil for the nourishment of vegetation. The character of the testaceous deposits, too, enable geologists, as those who study the nature and structure of the earth are termed, to come to important conclusions on many points connected with the subject of this investigation. And if we include, as the subject of our book allows, the inhabitants of shells, how wide a field of usefulness opens before us. How many thousands of our industrious population depend wholly, or in part, upon the capture and sale of shell-fish for their support. In some parts, as the western and northern Islands of Scotland, they have in times of scarcity afforded sustenance to the dwellers on the bleak and barren shores, who but for them must have perished. But of all this we shall have more to say when we come to describe the different members of the testaceous family. We will now offer a few remarks upon

Many other uses of shells could be mentioned to show that they play an important role in nature. They are part of the ways God decides to manage the affairs of this world, and they also contribute to science and everyday life. When shells decompose, the solid rocks they're made of often break down, spreading over a large area and creating fertile soil that helps plants grow. The type of shell deposits also allows geologists, who study the Earth's nature and structure, to draw significant conclusions about various related topics. If we include, as our book allows, the creatures that live in shells, a vast field of usefulness opens up. Countless people depend entirely or partially on catching and selling shellfish for their livelihood. In some areas, like the western and northern Islands of Scotland, shellfish have provided food to those living on harsh, barren shores, without which they would have suffered. We will discuss this further when we describe the different members of the shell family. Now, let's make a few comments on

THE INHABITANTS OF SHELLS;

Which belonging to that division of Natural History called the Mollusca, from the Latin Mollis—soft; these Molluscous animals, then, are animals having a soft body, and no internal skeleton. You may be quite sure that a Mollusk will never break its bones, because it has none to break; it has a shell, however, which may be broken, at least in some cases, for all Mollusks have not snug habitations of the kind; but wander about the watery or earthy world in which they live, quite naked; such as the sea and land slugs, and some worms, leeches, etc.: but with these we have nothing to do, our present subject including only a part of

Which belongs to that category of Natural History called the Mollusca, from the Latin Mollis—soft; these Molluscous animals are creatures that have soft bodies and lack an internal skeleton. You can be sure that a Mollusk will never break its bones because it has none to break; however, it does have a shell that can be broken, at least in some cases, since not all Mollusks have tight-fitting homes like that; some wander around the watery or earthy environments they inhabit completely uncovered, like sea and land slugs, and some worms, leeches, etc.: but we are not concerned with those, as our current topic only includes a part of

MALACOLOGY,

another member of that queer ology family, deriving its name from two Greek words signifying soft, and a discourse; hence it means a discourse upon soft, or soft-bodied, animals, that is mollusca. It is only a part then of Malacology that we have to do with; that part which relates to the shell-inhabiting mollusks, and strange creatures enough some of these are. We will have a look at them presently; just now it will be sufficient to observe that the mollusca testacea, or soft-bodied animals, furnished with shells, possess the power of exuding, that is, discharging from various parts of their bodies a sticky kind of fluid, which mixing with the chalky matter collected from the water, and becoming hard, forms, in process of time, the shelly covering which is at once a dwelling and a defence for the inhabitant.

another member of that peculiar group of sciences, taking its name from two Greek words that mean soft and a discourse; therefore, it refers to a discussion about soft-bodied animals, namely mollusca. We will focus only on a part of Malacology; specifically, the segment that deals with shell-dwelling mollusks, which are indeed quite strange creatures. We'll examine them shortly; for now, it’s enough to note that the mollusca testacea, or soft-bodied animals with shells, have the ability to exude a sticky fluid from various parts of their bodies. This fluid mixes with chalky material collected from the water and hardens over time, forming the shelly covering that serves as both a home and a protective barrier for the inhabitant.

Miss Pratt, in her delightful book on “Common Things of the Sea Coast,” observes of these shells that, “We gather up those which we find, and looking at their structure would fain know[xii] something of the inmate of such a dwelling. All nature proclaims the goodness of God. We hear that the bird which wings its way over our heads has a song of joy; the bee hums delightedly by us; and the little shrimp which darts in the clear pool, seems full of merriment. Was the inmate of the shell less cared for by its Maker? No doubt the little builder had some sense of joy, as he framed from his own substance the house which excites our admiration. Doubtless his existence, short and sluggish as it was, had its own consciousness of pleasure; and obscure as is his history, and little calculated as such a creature might seem to perform an important part in the economy of creation, yet we know that he had a work to do, not only for the living creatures of the sea, but for the well-being of man himself.”

Miss Pratt, in her delightful book on “Common Things of the Sea Coast,” notes about these shells that, “We pick up the ones we find, and by examining their structure, we want to know something about the occupant of such a dwelling. All of nature speaks to the goodness of God. We hear the bird soaring above us singing with joy; the bee buzzes happily nearby; and the little shrimp darting in the clear pool seems full of cheer. Was the inhabitant of the shell any less cared for by its Creator? No doubt the little builder experienced some joy as it made its home from its own material, a house that captivates our admiration. Certainly, its existence, brief and sluggish as it was, contained its own sense of pleasure; and though its story is obscure, and such a creature seems unlikely to play an important role in the workings of creation, we know it had a purpose not just for the sea creatures, but also for the well-being of humanity itself.”

CLASSIFICATION OF SHELLS.

The great naturalist Linnæus divided shells into thirty-six genera, each of which comprised a number of species; of these species somewhere about two thousand five hundred have been described and classified; the varieties, more or less distinct, are almost countless. Of shells found on and about the British Isles, there are about five hundred and fifty species, or, we should rather say were, for diligent enquirers into this branch of Natural History, are almost daily adding to the number.

The renowned naturalist Linnæus categorized shells into thirty-six genera, with each genus containing several species; around two thousand five hundred of these species have been described and classified. The varieties, which can be more or less distinct, are nearly endless. Regarding shells found in and around the British Isles, there are roughly five hundred and fifty species, or rather, we should say there were, as dedicated researchers in this field of Natural History are almost daily increasing that number.

We have already seen that shells are sometimes called Crystalline, and sometimes Granular, in accordance with certain peculiarities of construction before mentioned: this is one mode of division; there are several others made use of in different systems of arrangement, which only a deeper study of the subject than can be here entered upon, would enable one to understand; the plainest and most common, however, is that which has reference to the form of the shell, which is one of these—

We have already seen that shells are sometimes called Crystalline and sometimes Granular, based on certain unique construction features mentioned earlier: this is one way to categorize them; there are several other methods used in different classification systems, which only a more in-depth study of the subject than we can cover here would help one grasp; the simplest and most common, however, relates to the shape of the shell, which is one of these—

UNIVALVE. BIVALVE. MULTIVALVE.   Whelk. Mussel. Barnacle.

[xiii]

[xiii]

These words are derived from the Latin, unus—one, bi—two, multus—many, and therefore it may at once be seen that they apply to shells having one, two, or several pieces or divisions. Valve comes from the Latin valva, and means a folding door, a lid, a piece moving on a hinge, as the divisions in several of these shells do.

These words come from Latin: unus—one, bi—two, multus—many. So, it's clear they refer to shells with one, two, or multiple parts. The term valve is derived from the Latin valva, which means a folding door, a lid, or a piece that moves on a hinge, just like the sections in some of these shells do.

This order of arrangement is generally followed by those who make a collection of shells for a cabinet; and to this we shall adhere as at once the most simple and convenient, when we come to describe the several species of testaceous mollusks. We will now say a few words on

This arrangement is typically used by people who collect shells for a display; and we will stick to it as the simplest and most convenient approach when we describe the different species of shelled mollusks. Now, let’s say a few words on

TAKING AND PRESERVING SHELLS.

A diligent searcher along any beach or coast line, will be sure sometimes to light upon curious and valuable specimens, and especially after violent storms may such be sought for, with the greatest chance of success, for the agitation of the waters will then have loosened them from their natural beds and dwelling-places, and cast them on the shore. Very frequently, however, they will be so beaten about and defaced, that they will be comparatively valueless; if enveloped in tangled masses of sea-weed, they are likely to be preserved from injury; and such heaps of uprooted marine vegetation will often afford a rich harvest to the young conchologist, who should always carefully examine them. Many of the shells are so minute as scarcely to be seen with the naked eye, therefore this search can scarcely be properly effected without the assistance of a pocket lens, the cost of which is but trifling. The undersides of pieces of stranded timber, the bottoms of boats lately returned from a fishing voyage, the fisherman’s dredge or net, the cable, and the deep-sea line; all these may prove productive, and should be looked to whenever opportunity offers; nor should the search for land and fresh-water shells be neglected, for many of these are very curious, as well as beautiful, and no conchological collection is complete without them. For these, the best hunting grounds are the ditch side and the river bed, the mossy bank and the hedge-row; amid the twining, serpent-like roots of the old thorn and elder trees; the crevices of the garden wall, the undersides of stones, and all sorts of out-of-the-way holes, nooks, and corners, where may be found the Striped Zebra, and other prettily-marked snail shells, and many other kinds worthy of a place in—

A dedicated searcher along any beach or coastline will definitely come across interesting and valuable finds, especially after violent storms. These storms often shake them loose from their natural homes and wash them ashore. However, many of these finds might be knocked around and damaged, making them less valuable. If they are tangled in seaweed, they might be better protected from harm, and such clusters of uprooted marine plants can offer a great opportunity for novice conchologists, who should always examine them closely. Many shells are so tiny that they can barely be seen with the naked eye, so a pocket magnifier, which is inexpensive, is essential for a proper search. The undersides of driftwood, the bottoms of boats recently returned from fishing trips, a fisherman's dredge or net, cables, and deep-sea lines can all be productive sources worth checking out whenever possible. Don’t forget to search for land and freshwater shells too; many of these are both interesting and beautiful, and no conchology collection is complete without them. The best places to look for these include the edges of ditches and riverbeds, mossy banks, and hedgerows; among the twisting, snake-like roots of old thorn and elder trees; in the crevices of garden walls; under stones; and in all sorts of hidden spots, where you might find the Striped Zebra and other nicely patterned snail shells, along with many others deserving a place in—

THE CABINET;

which may be either large or small, plain or handsome, in accordance[xiv] with the means of the collector. Perhaps for a beginner just a nest of shallow drawers in a deal or other case, may be quite sufficient; these drawers should be divided into compartments, on the front side of each of which should be pasted a neatly written label, with the common and scientific name of the species of shell contained in it, together with brief mention of the date when, and the place where, it was taken; and any observations relating to it which can be comprised in a few words, and may seem to the collector of sufficient interest to warrant their insertion. This would be a good beginning; by and by, when the collection is large, the knowledge more ample, and the outlay can be spared, it will be time to think of something ornamental—mahogany and glass, and carved or inlaid work, such a Cabinet as would properly display and enhance the beauties of your testaceous treasures, which are too often stowed away, with other natural curiosities, in a very disorderly, higgledy-piggledy sort of manner, like the collection described by Dryden.

which may be either large or small, simple or attractive, depending on the collector's budget. Perhaps for a beginner, a set of shallow drawers in a wooden or other case might be quite enough; these drawers should be divided into compartments, on the front of each of which should be a neatly written label, detailing the common and scientific name of the shell species inside, along with a brief note of the date and location it was collected, and any observations that are brief yet interesting enough to include. This would be a good starting point; later on, when the collection grows, the knowledge expands, and the budget allows, it will be time to consider something more decorative—mahogany and glass, along with carved or inlaid features, a cabinet that would properly display and enhance the beauty of your shell treasures, which are often carelessly stored away with other natural curiosities in a very chaotic manner, similar to the collection described by Dryden.

“He furnishes his closet first, and fills
The crowded shelves with rarities of shells;
Adds orient pearls, which from the wave he drew,
And all the sparkling stones of various hue.”

When live shells, as they are called, that is having the living fish in them, are obtained, the best plan is to place them in spirits of wine, this at once deprives the inhabitant of life, without injuring the shell, which should then be placed in hot water for a time, the body of the mollusk is thus rendered firm, and may be removed by means of some pointed instrument; care should be taken to leave no portion of animal matter within, or after a while it will become putrid and give out a stain, which will show through and injure the delicate markings of the shell; the surest, most expeditious, and least troublesome mode of cleansing a shell, is to place it in an ant heap for a day or two; the busy little insects will penetrate into its inmost cavities, and remove hence all offending matter. There will be no difficulty in this respect with the multivalve and bivalve kinds, which are only kept closed by means of a set of muscles, which can be tightened or relaxed at the pleasure of the animal within, and become powerless to keep the shell closed as soon as that is dead. Great care must be taken to preserve unbroken the smaller parts of these shells, such as the hinges or teeth, as on the structure of these the scientific arrangement into genera chiefly depends; the beard also, as it is called, and silky threads, must not be removed, as these have much to do in determining the particular species.

When you get live shells, meaning they still have living fish inside, the best approach is to put them in alcohol. This will quickly kill the inhabitant without damaging the shell. After that, place the shell in hot water for a while to firm up the mollusk's body, which can then be removed with a pointed tool. Be careful not to leave any bits of animal inside, or it will rot and leave a stain that ruins the delicate patterns on the shell. The easiest and quickest way to clean a shell is to bury it in an ant mound for a day or two; the busy ants will get into all the tiny spaces and remove any leftover matter. This won't be an issue for multivalve and bivalve shells, which only stay closed thanks to muscles that can tighten or loosen at the animal's will. Once the animal is dead, those muscles can't keep the shell closed. It’s crucial to keep the smaller parts of these shells intact, like the hinges or teeth, since their structure is key to classifying them into scientific categories. The “beard” and silky threads also need to be preserved, as they play an important role in identifying the specific species.

River and land shells are generally very thin and brittle, and must be carefully handled; their colours are not usually so brilliant[xv] as those of the marine species, but they form links in the testaceous chain, which are necessary to a proper study and elucidation of conchology.

River and land shells are typically very thin and fragile, so they need to be handled with care; their colors aren't usually as vibrant as those of marine species, but they are important parts of the shell-collecting chain, which are essential for a thorough study and understanding of conchology.

The most glowing and gorgeous of all shells are those brought from the Tropical seas, and, excepting in a few rare instances, specimens of most of these can be obtained at little cost from any dealer, or from sailors returning from a voyage. If it is necessary to send either those, or British shells, any distance, or to pack them away in a small compass, the best plan is to wrap them separately in soft paper, place them in a box, and then pour in sawdust, bran, or fine sand, very dry, until all the open spaces are completely filled up.

The most stunning and beautiful shells come from tropical seas, and with a few rare exceptions, you can find most of these at low prices from dealers or sailors returning from voyages. If you need to ship those or British shells over long distances or pack them compactly, the best method is to wrap each shell in soft paper, place them in a box, and then fill all the empty spaces with dry sawdust, bran, or fine sand.

ON CLEANING AND POLISHING SHELLS.

All shells, whether inhabited or not, when taken should be soaked for a while in hot water, to remove the dirt which may adhere to them, and dissolve the saline, that is salt, particles contained in the sea water; they should then be thoroughly dried, and if, as is the case with many, they naturally possess a good polish, they are at once fit for the cabinet. Generally, however, it happens that when shells are dry, they lose much of the peculiar brilliancy of hue, which they possess when seen through the medium of the glistening water; to restore this, wash them over with a thin solution of gum arabic, or white of egg; some collectors use a varnish made of gum mastic, dissolved in spirits of wine; this is perhaps preferable, as it is not affected by moisture. Many shells have a very plain, dull, appearance, in consequence of being covered over with a kind of skin called an epidermis, a word derived from the Greek, and signifying the outer skin, sometimes called the cuticle. To remove this, soak the shell in warm water for some time, and then rub it over with a stiff brush until the covering is removed; should this be very thick, it will be necessary to mix a little nitric acid with the water, but this must be done very cautiously, for if too strong it will remove all the lustre from the surface of the shell subjected to its influence. Sometimes the file, and a substance called pumice stone has to be used, but these are dangerous agents in inexperienced hands. The best polish for the shell after the skin is removed, is a red earth called tripoli, applied on a piece of soft leather.

All shells, whether they’re occupied or not, should be soaked in hot water for a while to clean off any dirt that may stick to them and dissolve the salt particles from the seawater. After soaking, they should be thoroughly dried. Many shells naturally have a nice polish and are ready for display right away. However, when shells dry, they often lose a lot of their vibrant color that you see in the sparkling water. To bring that back, wash them with a thin solution of gum arabic or egg white. Some collectors prefer using a varnish made from gum mastic dissolved in alcohol, which is likely better because it isn't affected by moisture. Many shells look quite dull because they are covered with a type of skin called an epidermis, a term derived from Greek meaning outer skin, sometimes known as the cuticle. To remove this, soak the shell in warm water for a while, then scrub it with a stiff brush until the skin comes off. If the skin is very thick, you may need to mix a bit of nitric acid with the water, but do this carefully because if the solution is too strong, it can strip the shell of its shine. Sometimes you’ll need to use a file or pumice stone, but these can be risky for inexperienced users. The best polish for the shell after removing the skin is a red earth called tripoli, applied with a piece of soft leather.

FOSSIL SHELLS.

An eminent Geologist, named Dr. Mantell, has very beautifully and poetically termed rocks “The Medals of Creation.” As on coins[xvi] and medals we see stamped enduring records of great historical events, so upon the rocks are written by the finger of God, a history of some of the mighty changes which the earth has undergone, and fossil shells are among the plainest and most easily read of the characters or letters, in which these truths are written. As Dr. Harvey, in his “Sea-side Book,” observes, “Shelly-coated mollusca have existed in the waters of the sea and in rivers, from a very early period of the world’s history, and have left in its most stratified rocks and gravels abundance of their shells preserved in a more perfect manner than the remains of most other animals. Now as the species in the early rocks differ from those found in later formations, quite as much as the latter from the mollusca of our modern seas, the gradual change in the character of the embedded shells marks a certain interval of time in the world’s history.” So we see that these rocks are the leaves of a great book, written all over with wonderful truths, and those who study such sciences as Geology and Conchology, are enabled to read much that is there written.

An esteemed geologist, Dr. Mantell, has elegantly described rocks as “The Medals of Creation.” Just like coins[xvi] and medals bear lasting records of significant historical events, rocks hold a history of the major changes the earth has experienced, with fossil shells being some of the most recognizable and easily interpreted signs of these truths. As Dr. Harvey notes in his “Sea-side Book,” “Shelled mollusks have inhabited the seas and rivers for a very long time and have left behind many of their shells in the earth’s layered rocks and sediments, preserved more effectively than the remains of most other animals. Because the species found in the earliest rocks differ from those in later formations just as much as the latter differ from today’s mollusks, the gradual changes in the types of shells signal distinct periods in the earth’s history.” Thus, we see that these rocks are the pages of a grand book filled with remarkable truths, and those who study fields like geology and conchology can gain a lot of insight from what is written there.

Every fossil shell that such a student picks out of the chalk, or limestone, is like a letter in the Alphabet of Creation; it has a significance, or meaning, and a number of such put together, form as it were, words and sentences, that can be made up into chapters, full of instruction, aye, and of amusement too. The study may seem a little dry at first, but never mind, go on, and you will soon be rewarded for your diligence, by the wonders that will unfold themselves to your understanding—the fresh and delightful views which you will obtain into the wide universe, the new and enlarged ideas of the wisdom and goodness of the Creator, and of the formation, habits, and connexion each with each of his various creatures.

Every fossil shell that a student picks out of the chalk or limestone is like a letter in the Alphabet of Creation; it has its own significance and meaning, and when you put several of them together, they form, in a way, words and sentences that can be compiled into chapters full of information and even amusement. The study might seem a bit dry at first, but don’t worry, keep going, and you'll soon be rewarded for your efforts with the wonders that will reveal themselves to you—the fresh and exciting perspectives you'll gain about the vast universe, the new and expanded ideas of the Creator's wisdom and goodness, and the formation, habits, and connections between all of his various creatures.

Properly to treat of fossil shells, would require a book of itself, and a large book too; we can here but allude to the subject, as a part, and a very important and interesting part of the study of Conchology; more will be said about it in a volume which we purpose writing for this series, on Rocks, and the petrified organic remains found in and about them.

Properly discussing fossil shells would need a whole book, and a big one at that; here we can only touch on the topic as it is a significant and fascinating aspect of studying Conchology. We'll discuss it more in a volume we plan to write for this series about rocks and the fossilized organic remains found in and around them.

“Those relics of an older world, which tell
Of changes slow or sudden, that have past
Over the face of nature; fossil shell,
Shark’s tooth, and bone of megatheran vast,
Turned into stone, and so preserved to show
Man of those things whereof he ought to know.”

[17]

[17]

BEAUTIFUL SHELLS.

UNIVALVES.

Gasteropoda is a name given by some naturalists to a very extensive group of molluscous animals; the term is derived from two Greek words, signifying stomach and foot;—it has reference to the kind of fleshy foot which generally occupies the whole under side of the body, and by the contraction and extension of the muscles of which, the creature is enabled to glide, with a slow but steady motion, from place to place. The Slug and the Snail are the commonest examples which can be adduced of gasteropods; and one may tell by their slimy tracks, shining like silver in the morning sunshine, that during the night, which is their principal feeding time, they manage to get over a considerable extent of ground, although “a snail’s gallop” is a proverbial expression for slow motion; but it is astonishing how much work of any kind may be done if one “keeps at it;” by doing this the Tortoise beat the Hare, illustrating the truth of the proverb, that “slow and sure wins the race.” If you watch a Snail travelling with its house upon its back, it does not seem to make much way, and you are inclined to think that it will be long ere it reaches the new settlement to which it appears journeying with bag and baggage; but leave the spot for a while, and the chances are that on your return, the “slow coach” will[18] have got somewhere out of sight. Here is a lesson for boys and girls; whatever you take in hand, don’t be in a hurry, and if people say you are “slow,” think of the snail, and keep on!

Gasteropoda is a term used by some naturalists to describe a large group of mollusks. The word comes from two Greek words meaning stomach and foot; it relates to the fleshy foot that usually covers the entire underside of the body. By contracting and relaxing its muscles, the creature can glide slowly but steadily from one place to another. The slug and the snail are the most common examples of gasteropods; you can tell they’ve been around by their slimy trails, which shine like silver in the morning sunlight. During the night, which is when they mainly feed, they can cover a significant distance, even if “a snail’s pace” is a well-known phrase for something moving slowly. However, it's surprising how much can be accomplished if you just keep at it; the tortoise beating the hare is a perfect example, proving that “slow and steady wins the race.” If you watch a snail moving with its shell on its back, it doesn’t seem to be making much progress, and you might think it will take a while to reach its new destination. But if you leave for a bit and return, chances are that the “slow coach” will have disappeared from sight. This is a lesson for kids: whatever you’re working on, don’t rush, and if people call you “slow,” just think of the snail and keep going!

A snail

This, then, is a shelled mollusk of the third class, called Gasteropoda, according to the system of the French naturalist Cuvier. It has a distinct head, which, like the hinder part of the body, which we may call a tail if we like, projects, when the creature is in motion, considerably from the shell; it is also furnished with what we commonly call horns, naturalists say tentacles, from the Latin tento—trying, or essaying; with these the creature, as it were, feels its way; being extremely sensitive; they answer the purpose of organs both of sight and touch; put your finger slowly towards one of them, and you will observe that, even before contact, it begins to retract, or draw in, as though sensible of the approach of some opposing body, as it no doubt is. These horns of the snail, then, are its feelers—eyes to the blind, fingers to the fingerless; so God provides for his creatures all that may be necessary for their existence, and compensates for the deprivation of one sense or organ, by some admirable contrivance which meets the necessities of the case.[1]

This is a shelled mollusk from the third class, called Gasteropoda, according to the system created by the French naturalist Cuvier. It has a distinct head that, like the back part of its body—which we can refer to as a tail—sticks out a lot from the shell when the creature is moving. It also has what we commonly call horns, which naturalists refer to as tentacles, from the Latin tento—meaning trying or attempting; with these, the creature feels its way around since they are extremely sensitive. They serve as both sight and touch organs; if you slowly bring your finger toward one of them, you will notice that, even before you touch it, it starts to retract, as if it senses the approach of something threatening, which it likely does. These horns of the snail are therefore its feelers—eyes for the blind, fingers for the fingerless. So, God provides his creatures with everything they need to survive and compensates for the loss of one sense or organ with some remarkable adaptation that meets their needs. [1]

[1] It appears likely that the little knobs at the end of the snail’s feelers, are, as some naturalists assert, in reality eyes; if so, we were wrong in calling the creature blind. Yet is their position and construction so different from organs of sight generally, that they serve rather to strengthen than invalidate the above observations. The number of the horns varies in different kinds of snails from two to six, and some have none at all. These tentacles, when present, are always situated above the mouth; some of them have the knobs at the base, others at the sides; and it has been conjectured that they may be organs of smell, as well as of sight and touch.

[1] It seems likely that the little knobs at the end of the snail’s feelers are, as some naturalists suggest, actually eyes; if that’s the case, we were mistaken in calling the creature blind. However, their position and structure are so different from typical vision organs that they actually support, rather than contradict, the observations mentioned earlier. The number of tentacles varies among different types of snails, ranging from two to six, and some have none at all. When present, these tentacles are always located above the mouth; some have the knobs at the base, while others have them on the sides. It has been speculated that they might function as organs of smell, in addition to sight and touch.

THE COMMON SNAIL

Is called by naturalists Helix aspersa, the generic name being derived from a Greek word signifying spiral, and having reference to the shape of the shell; the plural is Helices, a term applied to all convoluted or twisted shells, which terminate in a point like a church spire: a spiral-shelled fossil is called a helicate. The specific name comes from the Latin asper—rough, whence also our English word asperity—roughness, and[19] several others. The Helicidæ, or Helix family, is that which includes the land shell Snails and the naked Slugs, and in this family there are several genera; they are distinguished from the shelled water Snails, both sea and river, by having a different breathing apparatus, and some other points of internal construction which it is not necessary to describe here.

Is called by naturalists Helix aspersa, with the generic name coming from a Greek word meaning spiral, referring to the shape of the shell; the plural is Helices, a term used for all twisted or coiled shells that end in a point like a church spire: a spiral-shelled fossil is known as a helicate. The specific name is derived from the Latin asper—rough, which also gives us the English word asperity—meaning roughness, among others. The Helicidæ, or Helix family, includes land shell snails and naked slugs, and within this family, there are several genera; they are different from shelled water snails, both from the sea and rivers, due to having a different breathing mechanism and various other internal structures that don’t need to be described here.

The Common Snail has a mouth, of which it makes good use, as market gardeners well know, and yet this mouth is not furnished with teeth; instead of these, the upper lip, which is of a horny texture, is what is called dentated, from the Latin dentus—a tooth, that is, divided or separated, so as to present somewhat the appearance of a row of teeth in the jaw; this lip is of an arched form, and appears to be a very serviceable kind of instrument to Mr. Helix aspersa, who, if his character be not aspersed, is very destructive to all sorts of greenery. The lower lip is divided only in the middle, where there is an opening of some width: it is not horny, like the upper one.

The Common Snail has a mouth that it uses well, as market gardeners know, but this mouth doesn’t have teeth. Instead of teeth, the upper lip, which is tough and horn-like, is what’s called dentated, from the Latin dentus—meaning tooth, which is divided or separated, giving it a somewhat tooth-like appearance in the jaw. This lip is curved and seems to be a really useful tool for Mr. Helix aspersa, who, if his reputation isn't unfairly tarnished, can be quite destructive to all kinds of greenery. The lower lip is split only in the center, where it has a fairly wide opening; it’s not tough like the upper one.

Snails lay eggs, which are about the size of very small peas; they are soft, and of a whitish colour. Being semi, that is, half, transparent, or clear, their contents can be partly seen; and in those of a water Snail, deposited against the side of a glass bottle, the young were detected with partially formed shells upon their backs.

Snails lay eggs that are about the size of tiny peas; they are soft and whitish in color. Because they are semi-transparent, you can see part of what’s inside them. In the case of a water snail, when the eggs were placed against the side of a glass bottle, the young snails could be seen with partially formed shells on their backs.

To shew how tenacious they are of life, it has been mentioned that Mr. S. Simon, a Dublin merchant, had a collection of fossils and other curiosities left him by his father; among these were some shells of Snails, and fifteen years after the collection came into his possession, his son had the shells to play with, and placed them in a basin of water, when lo! out came the slimy bodies and knobbed horns of several of the Gasteropods, no doubt hungry enough after their long sleep.

To show how determined they are to survive, it's been noted that Mr. S. Simon, a merchant from Dublin, inherited a collection of fossils and other curiosities from his father. Among these were some snail shells, and fifteen years after Mr. Simon got the collection, his son decided to play with the shells and put them in a basin of water. To his surprise, out came the slimy bodies and curved tentacles of several of the gastropods, clearly hungry after their long nap.

We all know that our Common Snails hybernate, or sleep through the winter. As soon as the chills of autumn are felt, they seek out some snug crevice in an old wall, or burrow in the earth, or congregate beneath garden pots, roots of trees, thatched roofs, or in any hole or corner that may be convenient, and then throwing a kind of temporary skin, like a drum head, which naturalists call operculum, over the opening of[20] their shells, and sticking themselves fast to the sides of their refuge, or to each other, they sleep away, careless of frosts and tempests.

We all know that our Common Snails hibernate, or sleep through the winter. As soon as the autumn chill sets in, they look for a cozy spot in an old wall, dig into the ground, or gather under garden pots, tree roots, thatched roofs, or any nearby hole or corner that works. They then form a temporary cover, like a drumhead, which naturalists call operculum, over the opening of[20] their shells. By sticking themselves to the sides of their hiding places or to each other, they drift off to sleep, indifferent to frost and storms.

A moist and rather warm state of the atmosphere seems most congenial to the land Snails, some species of which are found in all countries, except those where the most intense cold prevails. Generally speaking, they do not like dry heat, and to escape from it will get under stones, and into other cool places, from whence a shower brings them forth in such numbers, the smaller species especially, as to lead to the popular belief that it sometimes rains Snails.

A damp and somewhat warm atmosphere seems most suitable for land snails, some species of which can be found in all countries except those with extreme cold. Generally, they don't like dry heat, so to avoid it, they hide under stones and in other cool places, and when it rains, they come out in such large numbers, especially the smaller species, that it has led to the popular belief that it sometimes rains snails.

These Gasteropods, although extremely injurious to vegetation, must not be regarded as worse than useless, as they commonly are; besides furnishing food for several wild, as well as domesticated, birds, they are no doubt a nourishing article of diet for man. The Romans had their cochlearia, where Snails were regularly fed and fattened for the table; and the French at the present day their escargotoires, or Snailery, for the same purpose; some of the Snails so kept, attain an immense size, as well they may if fed, as by the Romans, on new wine and meal. Many poor persons, especially those who are consumptive, might no doubt derive much cheap sustenance and benefit from using the larger species of Helicidæ, which might be collected from hedges and gardens as food. Why should they not eat those as well as the marine mollusks, such as Oysters, Cockles, Whelks, etc.

These Gasteropods, while extremely damaging to plants, shouldn't be seen as completely useless, as they're often thought to be. Besides providing food for several wild and domesticated birds, they are undoubtedly a nutritious option for people. The Romans had their cochlearia, where snails were regularly raised and fattened for meals, and the French today have their escargotoires, or snail farms, for the same purpose. Some of the snails raised can grow quite large, especially when fed, as the Romans did, with new wine and grain. Many low-income individuals, especially those who are ill, could benefit from using the larger types of Helicidæ, which can be gathered from hedges and gardens as food. Why shouldn't they eat these as well as the sea creatures like oysters, cockles, and whelks?

Snails have an extraordinary power of re-producing any part which may be injured or cut off, even to the extent of the whole head, as has been observed to be the case; the reparation of injury done to the shell they can effect easily, as can all testaceous mollusks. Respecting the construction of the shell it may be observed that it is produced in the thickness of the mantle, or cloak-like covering which envelopes the body of the animal; the formation commences at the small end or spire, and gradually goes on, whorl upon whorl, as the still widening circles which give the ridgy appearance to most univalves, are called. Columella, or pillar, is the name given to the spire on which the cones are rolled; this is sometimes solid, and sometimes hollow; when the latter, the open end is called the Umbilicus, meaning the navel or centre.[21] The opening at the bottom, from which the animal issues, is the last portion finished, and this is called the aperture, a Latin word adopted into the English dictionary. Some of these Helices are wide and flat, even hollow and cup-like, with the whorls rising above the pillar—these are called discoid shells; others which are long and narrow, with projecting spires, are termed turbinated shells; the former being more or less flat or disk-like, the latter twisted, whirling, like a spinning-top, from the Latin turbo—a whirling, a turning round.

Snails have an amazing ability to regenerate any part that gets injured or cut off, even their entire head, as has been observed. They can easily repair damage to their shell, just like all shell-bearing mollusks. Regarding the structure of the shell, it forms from the thickness of the mantle, or the cloak-like covering that surrounds the animal's body; the formation begins at the small end or spire and gradually develops, whorl by whorl, creating the ridged appearance seen in most univalves. The term Columella, or pillar, refers to the spire around which the cones are arranged; sometimes it is solid, and other times it is hollow; when it is hollow, the open end is called the Umbilicus, meaning the navel or center.[21] The opening at the bottom, where the animal emerges, is the last part to be completed and is called the aperture, a Latin word that has been included in the English dictionary. Some of these Helices are broad and flat, even hollow and cup-shaped, with the whorls extending above the pillar—these are referred to as discoid shells; others that are long and slender, with protruding spires, are called turbinated shells; the former being more or less flat or disk-like, and the latter twisted and whirling, similar to a spinning top, derived from the Latin turbo—meaning whirling or turning around.

DISCOID.
TURBINATED.

If we take a Common Snail, and plunge it into boiling water, which will instantly kill it, so that it can be removed from the shell, we shall find the whole of that part of the body which was lodged in the upper whorls, or spiral part of the shell, is covered with a thin membrane or skin; this is called the mantle, and that portion of it which corresponds with what we may consider as the back of the mollusk, and which is considerably thickened, is termed the collar; here are situated the glands, which secrete the colouring and other matter of which the shell is mainly composed; although the substance called nacre, or mother-of-pearl, is secreted in the thinner part of the mantle; it is however from the collar that the growth or increase of the shell proceeds. It is in accordance with certain variations in the shape and disposition of this mantle and collar, that shells assume such very different shapes. Sometimes the whorls or spiral ridges, are projected or thrown far out, and this produces the turbinated shell. Sometimes they scarcely rise above each other, but rather spread towards the sides, and then we have the discoid shape. Generally speaking, the whorls of a shell take a direction from left to right, but occasionally an opposite one;[22] they are then called sinistral, or left-handed shells: such are not common. If one of the twisted shells be divided length-ways, it will be seen that the inside of the whorls wind in an ascending direction, round the Columella, or central column, as the spiral staircases in the Crystal Palace.

If we take a Common Snail and put it into boiling water, it will die instantly, allowing us to remove it from its shell. We'll find that the part of its body that was inside the upper spirals of the shell is covered with a thin membrane or skin; this is called the mantle. The thicker part that corresponds to what we can think of as the back of the mollusk is called the collar. This is where the glands are located that produce the color and other materials that mainly make up the shell; however, the substance known as nacre, or mother-of-pearl, is secreted in the thinner area of the mantle, while the collar is responsible for the growth or increase of the shell. The differences in the shape and arrangement of the mantle and collar cause shells to have various forms. Sometimes, the spirals or ridges are extended outward, creating a turbinated shell. Other times, they barely rise above one another but spread out to the sides, resulting in a discoid shape. Generally, the spirals of a shell turn from left to right, but occasionally they do the opposite;[22] these are called sinistral or left-handed shells, which are uncommon. If one of the twisted shells is cut lengthwise, you can see that the inside of the spirals winds upward around the Columella, or central column, similar to the spiral staircases in the Crystal Palace.

But let us return to our Garden Snail, who has many near relatives in Britain, several of which have beautifully-marked and convoluted shells, as will be seen by a reference to our coloured illustrations, Plate I. We will introduce them in due order. Fig. 1, the Banded Snail, (Helix nemoralis,) from the Latin nemus—a wood or grove; the prettily-striped shells of this species may be found in great plenty among the roots and in the crevices of the rugged boles of old forest trees, as well as in hedge-rows and in mossy banks, and other situations near woods. Fig. 2, the Heath Snail, (H. ericetorum,) from erica, the Latin for heath; a small species with brown bands, remarkable for its large umbilicus, perforating the centre of the shell nearly through. Fig. 3, the Silky Snail, (H. sericea,) from the Latin sericus—silk-like; the shell of this species is covered with short slimy hairs, which give it a glistening appearance. Fig. 4, the Stone Snail, (H. lapicida,) from the Latin lapis—a stone: Linnæus called the species the Stone Cutter, probably on account of its habit of frequenting stony places, and the peculiar construction of the shell, which has a sharp edge running round each whorl; it is commonly found lodged in the cavities of loose-lying stones, but which it can scarcely be suspected of having hollowed out for its own accommodation.

But let’s go back to our Garden Snail, which has many close relatives in Britain, several of which have beautifully marked and twisted shells, as you can see in our colored illustrations, Plate I. We’ll introduce them in the right order. Fig. 1, the Banded Snail, (Helix nemoralis), from the Latin nemus—a wood or grove; the nicely striped shells of this species can be found in abundance among the roots and in the cracks of the rugged trunks of old forest trees, as well as in hedgerows and mossy banks, and other places near woods. Fig. 2, the Heath Snail, (H. ericetorum), from erica, the Latin for heath; a small species with brown bands, known for its large umbilicus, which nearly perforates the center of the shell. Fig. 3, the Silky Snail, (H. sericea), from the Latin sericus—silk-like; the shell of this species is covered with short slimy hairs, giving it a shiny appearance. Fig. 4, the Stone Snail, (H. lapicida), from the Latin lapis—a stone: Linnaeus called this species the Stone Cutter, likely because of its habit of living in stony areas and the unique shape of the shell, which has a sharp edge circling each whorl; it's commonly found resting in the gaps of loosely stacked stones, though it’s hard to believe it actually made those hollows for itself.

Fig. 5, the Elegant Cyclostome, (Cyclostoma elegans.) On turning to the dictionary, we find that cyclostomous means having a circular mouth. This species is sometimes called Turbo elegans; the beautifully-marked shells are often found in chalk-hills covered with brushwood. This pretty mollusk has a curious mode of travelling; the under surface of the foot, which is long, is divided by a deep fissure, into two narrow strips, like ribbons; these take hold of whatever the creature may be moving on alternately; one keeping fast hold while the other advances, in like manner to fix itself, and drag the body forward. Fig. 6, the Undulated Plekocheilos, (P. undulatus;) the Latin plecto—to twist or twine, seems[23] to be the root from which the generic name of this Snail is derived; the specific name will be easily understood; to undulate, is to flow like waves, and the lines on the shell it will be seen are undulating. This is not a British species, but is introduced here to give variety to the group; it is a West Indian Mollusk, and is found in immense numbers in the forests of St. Vincent; it glues its eggs to the leaves of a plant which holds water, and thus secures for them a damp atmosphere at all times. And here we must conclude our chapter of Land Snails, leaving unnoticed very many beautiful and interesting species, both British and Foreign.

Fig. 5, the Elegant Cyclostome, (Cyclostoma elegans). Looking it up in the dictionary, we see that cyclostomous means having a circular mouth. This species is sometimes called Turbo elegans; the beautifully marked shells are often found on chalk hills covered in brushwood. This lovely mollusk has a unique way of moving; the underside of its long foot is split by a deep groove into two narrow strips, like ribbons. These strips alternately grip whatever surface the creature is on; one holds on tightly while the other moves forward, then secures itself, pulling the body along. Fig. 6, the Undulated Plekocheilos, (P. undulatus); the Latin plecto — to twist or twine, seems to be the origin of this snail's generic name; the specific name is easy to understand; to undulate means to flow like waves, and the lines on the shell are undulating. This is not a British species but is included here to add variety to the group; it is a West Indian mollusk and is found in huge numbers in the forests of St. Vincent. It attaches its eggs to the leaves of a plant that holds water, ensuring a moist environment for them at all times. We will now conclude our chapter on Land Snails, leaving many beautiful and interesting species, both British and foreign, unmentioned.

Many poets have alluded to the Snail, but we can only find room for a few verses by Cowper:—

Many poets have mentioned the Snail, but we can only include a few verses by Cowper:—

To grass, or leaf, or fruit, or wall,
The snail sticks close, nor fears to fall,
As if he grew there, house and all
Together.
Within that house secure he hides,
When danger imminent betides
Of storm, or other harm besides,
Of weather.
Give but his horns the slightest touch,
His self-collecting power is such,
He shrinks into his house with much
Displeasure.
Where’er he dwells, he dwells alone,
Except himself has chattels none,
Well satisfied to be his own
Whole treasure.
Thus hermit-like, his life he leads,
Nor partner of his banquet needs,
And if he meets one only feeds
The faster.
Who seeks him must be worse than blind,
(He and his house are so combin’d,)
If, finding it, he fails to find
Its master.

FRESH-WATER SHELLS.

Many of the following group of Fresh-water Shells, are remarkable for elegance of form, and some for richness of colouring;[24] hence, perhaps, the scientific name applied to the family in which they are mostly included—Limnæidæ, which, like limn—to paint, agrees with the French enluminer. These mollusks are found in rivers, streams, ditches, and moist marshy places. Like those which live wholly on land, they breathe through lungs, and therefore cannot exist without air; which accounts for their frequently coming to the surface, when under water. In brooks, as well as in stagnant pools, which abound with aquatic plants, they may be found in vast numbers, feeding upon the moist vegetation.

Many of the freshwater shells in this group are notable for their elegant shapes, and some are striking for their vibrant colors;[24] this might explain the scientific name given to the family they mostly belong to—Limnæidæ, which is similar to limn—to paint, and aligns with the French word enluminer. These mollusks are found in rivers, streams, ditches, and damp marshy areas. Like those that live entirely on land, they breathe through lungs, which means they can't survive without air; this is why they often rise to the surface when underwater. They can be found in large numbers in streams as well as stagnant pools filled with aquatic plants, where they feed on the lush vegetation.

L. stagnalis, the Common Limnea, two views

The Common Limnea, (L. stagnalis,) is mostly an inhabitant of stagnant waters, where it is often seen floating with the shell reversed, as in a boat; this shell, like most of those of the Fresh-water Mollusks, is thin, and easily broken; the shape it will be seen, is peculiarly elegant, the spire being slender and pointed—very different from that of the Spreading Limnea, called by naturalists, L. auricularia, from aurus—the ear, to which the broad aperture, or opening of the shell, may be compared; this resembles the other species in its habits. The Horny Planorbis, in Latin P. corneus, from cornu—a horn. The shape, you will see, is flat, the whorls rolling upon each other like the folds of a bugle horn; this shape would be termed orbicular, from orbis—a sphere, or circular body. This is the largest European species of Fresh-water Shells so constructed; it is[25] often found in deep clear ditches, and yields a beautiful purple dye, which, however, soon becomes dull, and changes; it cannot be fixed, and is therefore valueless. The mouth of this shell in fine specimens, is tinged with pale violet or lilac.

The Common Limnea, (L. stagnalis), primarily lives in stagnant waters, where it’s often seen floating with its shell upside down, like a little boat. This shell, like most freshwater mollusks, is thin and easily broken. Its shape is particularly elegant, with a slender, pointed spire—very different from the Spreading Limnea, known to naturalists as L. auricularia, which gets its name from aurus—the ear, due to its broad opening that resembles an ear. This species shares similar habits with the others. Then there's the Horny Planorbis, in Latin P. corneus, from cornu—meaning horn. Its shape is flat, with whorls wrapping around each other like the folds of a bugle horn; this shape can be described as orbicular, from orbis—a sphere or circular body. This is the largest European species of freshwater shells with this structure; it is[25]often found in deep, clear ditches and produces a beautiful purple dye that, unfortunately, quickly fades and changes; it can't be fixed, making it worthless. The mouth of this shell in well-preserved specimens is tinged with pale violet or lilac.

P. corneus, the Horny Planorbis

There is another kind, the Keeled Planorbis, (P. lurinatus,) which has the outer edge of the shell finely ridged, or keeled; it is very small, and very plentiful in fresh-water, both running and stagnant; where, too, is found the Common Physa, (P. fontinalis,) the latter word meaning a spring or fountain. This little mollusk is a quick and active traveller, it sometimes comes out of its shell, and throws itself about in an extraordinary way, keeping fast hold by its foot; the generic name, Physa, would seem to have reference to the round, smooth, delicate shell, and to come from the same root as Physalite, which means a topaz: the members of this genus are very numerous, being found nearly all over the globe. The next belongs to the family Auriculadæ, or Ear Shells. The Midas’ Ear, (A. Midæ;) this handsome shell is prized by collectors; it comes from the East Indies. Midas, it is said, was one who set himself up for a judge of music in the old fabulous times, and not appreciating that of Apollo, was rewarded by the angry god with a pair of ass’s ears.

There’s another type, the Keeled Planorbis, (P. lurinatus), which has the outer edge of its shell finely ridged or keeled. It’s very small and quite common in freshwater, both in flowing and still water. Also found there is the Common Physa, (P. fontinalis), where the term "fontinalis" refers to a spring or fountain. This little mollusk is a speedy and active traveler; it sometimes leaves its shell and moves around in an impressive way, holding on tightly with its foot. The generic name, Physa, seems to relate to the round, smooth, delicate shell and comes from the same root as Physalite, which means topaz. There are many species in this genus, found nearly all over the world. The next belongs to the family Auriculadæ, or Ear Shells. The Midas’ Ear, (A. Midæ), is a beautiful shell that collectors highly value; it originates from the East Indies. According to legend, Midas was a figure who declared himself a judge of music in ancient times, and when he didn’t appreciate Apollo’s music, he was punished by the angry god with a pair of donkey ears.

P. lurinatus, the Keeled Planorbis

The Cone-shaped Melampus, (M. corniformis,) also an Ear Shell, is found in the rivers of the Antilles Islands. It is a pretty shell; the formation is much the same as that of many of the most highly-prized varieties of Marine Shells; of these we shall have to speak presently. Melampodium in Latin, signifies a poisonous plant called Black Helebore; in the Mythology, Melampus was a great magician, who did all sorts of wonderful things; but we cannot tell what relation there exists between either the plant or the magician and this pretty cone[26] shell. To give variety to this group, we will now throw in a land species called Megaspira Ruschenbergiana, about the origin of whose name we cannot even hazard a guess; the termination of the generic name, you will see is spira, and a glance at the shell will at once suggest a reason for this; its long tapering spire consists of twenty-three closely-set gradually increasing whorls. This is a rare shell, whose inhabitant has not yet been described by naturalists; several of the marine species closely resemble it in shape. Much more might be said about the Land and Fresh-water Shells, but we must here leave them, having a wide field before us, namely, the Sea or Marine Testacea, one of the most common of which is

The Cone-shaped Melampus, (M. corniformis), which is also known as an Ear Shell, is found in the rivers of the Antilles Islands. It’s a beautiful shell; its shape is quite similar to many of the most sought-after varieties of Marine Shells, which we will discuss shortly. The term Melampodium in Latin refers to a poisonous plant known as Black Helebore; in mythology, Melampus was a powerful magician who performed all sorts of amazing feats; however, we can't explain the connection between either the plant or the magician and this lovely cone[26] shell. To add some variety to this group, we’ll now introduce a land species called Megaspira Ruschenbergiana, about the origin of whose name we have no real clue; you’ll notice the generic name ends with spira, and just looking at the shell makes it clear why; its long, tapering spire is made up of twenty-three closely packed, gradually enlarging whorls. This is a rare shell, and its inhabitant has not yet been described by naturalists; several marine species closely resemble it in shape. There is much more to say about Land and Fresh-water Shells, but we need to move on, as we have a broader topic to explore, specifically, the Sea or Marine Testacea, one of the most common of which is

Megaspira Ruschenbergiana

THE WHELK,

A univalve shell inhabited by a gasteropod mollusk, or, we should rather say, naturally so tenanted, for very frequently it is taken possession of by the Soldier or Hermit Crab, which having no hard covering to protect their soft plump bodies, are obliged to take lodgings where they can get them, and generally prefer the Whelk shell, of which we here give a figure.

A single-shell occupied by a gastropod mollusk, or, we should say, typically inhabited, since it is often taken over by the Soldier or Hermit Crab, which, lacking a hard shell to protect their soft, plump bodies, have to find shelter wherever they can, and usually prefer the Whelk shell, of which we provide an illustration here.

Buccinum undatum, the Waved Whelk

This is one of the commonest of our Marine Mollusks; it is called by naturalists Buccinum undatum; the first, or generic term, being the Latin for a trumpet, and the second, or specific name, meaning waved, or, as we often say, undulated. So we call this the Waved Whelk; fishermen term it the Conch, or the Buckie, and tell strange stories of its ravenous appetite and murderous propensities; how, with its spiny tongue, situated at the end of a long flexible proboscis or[27] trunk, it drills a hole in the shell of the Oyster, or other testacean, and sucks out the contents; empty shells, so drilled, are frequently found on the shore, and often, when the dredge is let down into an oyster bed, it comes up time after time filled with Whelks, of which such numbers are sometimes taken, that they are sold to the farmers to be used as manure for the soil. This mollusk is a favourite article of food with the poorer classes of our land, but it is hard and indigestible. The shell may frequently be found in large numbers among the beach stones; it is strong and firm, from three to four inches long, of a dirty yellowish white. There are two other Whelks common upon our coasts—the Stone or Dog Whelk, (B. lapillus,) from the Latin lapis—a stone, and B. reticulatum, so called because the shell is reticulated, or marked with many lines crossing each other, like net-work; it comes from the Latin reticulum—a net; hence also we have reticule—a small work bag, at one time very much carried by ladies.

This is one of the most common Marine Mollusks; it's known by scientists as Buccinum undatum; the first part, or generic term, is the Latin word for a trumpet, and the second part, or specific name, means waved, or, as we often say, undulated. So we call this the Waved Whelk; fishermen refer to it as the Conch or the Buckie and tell strange stories about its fierce appetite and predatory behavior; how, with its spiny tongue, located at the end of a long flexible proboscis or[27] trunk, it drills a hole in the shell of an Oyster or other shellfish and sucks out the insides. Empty shells with drill marks are often found on the shore, and frequently, when the dredge is lowered into an oyster bed, it comes up time after time filled with Whelks; so many are sometimes caught that they're sold to farmers to be used as fertilizer. This mollusk is a popular food choice for the poorer classes in our country, but it is tough and hard to digest. The shell can often be found in large quantities among the beach stones; it’s strong and sturdy, ranging from three to four inches long, with a dirty yellowish-white color. There are two other Whelks commonly found along our coasts—the Stone or Dog Whelk, (B. lapillus), with the name coming from the Latin lapis—a stone, and B. reticulatum, named because its shell is reticulated, or marked with many intersecting lines like a net; the name derives from the Latin reticulum—a net; that’s also why we have reticule—a small handbag that was once very popular among ladies.

ROCK SHELLS,

Are so called on account of their rough and wrinkled forms; they are nearly allied to the Whelks, to which they bear a close resemblance. Several species are found on our shores, the most common being the Humble Murex, (M. despectus,) from the Latin despecto—to despise; this is often used by the fishermen for bait. Some of the foreign Rock Shells are very curious and beautiful; three of them will be found on Plate II.—Figs. 1, 2, and 3. The Common Thorny Woodcock, (M. tribulus,) from the French for trouble, whence we have also tribulation, which is sometimes said to be a thorny path. This curious shell is also called Venus’ Comb. It is found in the Indian Ocean, from whence it is also brought. Fig. 2, the Woodcock’s Head, (M. haustellum,) from the Latin haustus—a draught; the bill of the Woodcock being adapted for sucking. This term is also applied to insects that live by suction. The shell, it will be seen, is destitute of spines, but it is ribbed and beautifully marked. Fig. 3 is worthy of its name—the[28] Royal Murex, (M. regius,) from regno—to reign. It is a splendid species, of the rich colouring of which, art can give but a faint impression. It is brought from the western coast of Central and South America, where, as well as in the islands of the South Pacific, many new shells of the genus Murex have been discovered.

Are called that because of their rough and wrinkled shapes; they are closely related to Whelks, which they resemble a lot. Several species can be found on our shores, with the most common being the Humble Murex, (M. despectus), from the Latin despecto—to despise; fishermen often use this as bait. Some foreign Rock Shells are quite interesting and beautiful; three of them can be seen on Plate II.—Figs. 1, 2, and 3. The Common Thorny Woodcock, (M. tribulus), comes from the French word for trouble, which is also the root of tribulation, sometimes described as a thorny path. This unique shell is also known as Venus’ Comb. It’s found in the Indian Ocean, where it is also collected. Fig. 2 shows the Woodcock’s Head, (M. haustellum), from the Latin haustus—a draught, since the Woodcock's bill is designed for sucking. This term is also used for insects that feed by suction. The shell, as you will see, lacks spines, but it is ribbed and beautifully patterned. Fig. 3 lives up to its name—the [28]Royal Murex, (M. regius), from regno—to reign. It is a stunning species, and the richness of its color cannot be fully captured by art. It is gathered from the western coast of Central and South America, where, as well as in the islands of the South Pacific, many new shells of the genus Murex have been discovered.

P. Scorpius

One shell found on our own coast, often mistaken for a Whelk, is the Pelican’s-foot Strombus, called in scientific language, Strombus pes-pelicanus, which is but a Latinized form of the English name. This shell varies greatly in shape in different stages of its growth, and by an inexperienced conchologist, the young, middle-aged, and old Strombus, might be taken for distinct species. In the Strombidæ family, so called we know not why, the same word in Latin meaning a kind of shell-fish, are some species which have produced pearls. One member of the family which we sometimes see in collections, is a large and very beautiful shell; this is the Broad-winged Strombus, (S. latissimus,) probably from latesco—to wax or grow broad, or large; issimus being in the superlative degree, would indicate that this shell was very much so, as we find it is, sometimes measuring as much as twelve inches across. In Plate II, is a representation of this handsome shell, greatly reduced in size, of course: see Fig. 4. We here give a figure, as more curious than beautiful, of the Scorpion Pteroceras, (P. scorpius,) which also belongs to the Strombidæ family; as does the curious Chinese Spindle, (Rostellaria rectirostris.) The generic name of the first of these species, comes from the Greek Ptero, pronounced tero, meaning a wing,[29] and cerus—waxen. Both the generic and specific names of the second refer to the peculiar conformation of the shell, being derived from the Latin, and meaning a straight line or beak.

One shell found on our coast, often confused with a whelk, is the Pelican’s-foot Strombus, scientifically named Strombus pes-pelicanus, which is just a Latin version of the English name. This shell varies greatly in shape across different growth stages, and an inexperienced conchologist might mistake the young, middle-aged, and old Strombus for different species. In the Strombidæ family, whose name origins are unclear, some species can produce pearls. One representative of this family that we sometimes see in collections is a large and beautiful shell known as the Broad-winged Strombus (S. latissimus), likely named from latesco—to become broad or large; issimus indicates that this shell is indeed very large, sometimes measuring up to twelve inches across. In Plate II, there is a depiction of this attractive shell, albeit much smaller: see Fig. 4. We also include a figure, which is more curious than beautiful, of the Scorpion Pteroceras (P. scorpius), which belongs to the Strombidæ family, as does the unusual Chinese Spindle (Rostellaria rectirostris). The generic name of the first species comes from the Greek Ptero, pronounced tero, meaning "wing," and cerus—meaning waxen. Both the generic and specific names of the second species refer to the unique shape of the shell, derived from Latin, meaning a straight line or beak.

CHINESE SPINDLE.

On Plate III, will be found the Imbricated Purpurea, (P. imbricata,) Fig. 1, which claims a close alliance with the Whelks. The generic name has reference to the dye yielded by this, as well as all the shells of the genus; the specific name comes from the Latin imbrex—the gutter-tile; thus imbricated, a term often used in Natural History, means ridged, like the roof of a house, where the tiles are placed to overlap each other, so that the rain will run off. The Persian Purpura, or, as it is called in Latin, Purpura Persica, Fig. 2, is another handsome shell of this family group; its name indicates the place where it is found. The other species described comes from South America, and the P. lapillus, (the meaning of the specific name has already been explained,) is common on our shores, being found in great abundance on the rocks at low waiter. We read in scripture, of Tyrian purple, and there is every reason to suppose that the rich colour was obtained from these and other shell-fish.

On Plate III, you'll find the Imbricated Purpurea, (P. imbricata), Fig. 1, which has a close connection to the Whelks. The generic name refers to the dye produced by this species, as well as all the shells in its genus; the specific name comes from the Latin imbrex—the gutter-tile. Thus, imbricated, a term often used in Natural History, means ridged, like the roof of a house, where the tiles overlap to allow rain to run off. The Persian Purpura, or Purpura Persica in Latin, Fig. 2, is another beautiful shell from this family; its name indicates where it’s found. The other species described comes from South America, and the P. lapillus (the meaning of the specific name has already been explained) is common along our shores, found abundantly on the rocks at low water. In scripture, we read about Tyrian purple, and there's every reason to believe that this rich color was sourced from these and other shellfish.

PERIWINKLE.

T. littoreus, periwinkle

This is the commonest representative which we have of the family Turbinidæ, which comprehends, according to Cuvier, all the species which have the shell completely and regularly turbinated, that is, if we translate the Latin word into English, twisted. The little Periwinkle, (here he is,) is by no means a handsome mollusk, but some of his relatives are very beautiful as we shall presently show.[30] He is called by naturalists T. littoreus, from littoralis—belonging to the shore, and often eaten by boys and girls with great relish; but he is not very digestible, and sometimes occasions dangerous disorders. The Swedish peasants believe that when the Periwinkle crawls high upon the rocks, a storm is brewing from the south; but Linnæus quotes a Norwegian author to shew that according to popular belief, it foretells the approach of a land wind with a calm on shore. Man may learn much of elemental changes from an observation of the movements and habits of all living creatures, which are instructed by God to provide for their safety and wants, and often perceive, long before man himself does, the indications of calm and tempest, rain and drought, etc. But our little Turbo, what of him? will you boil him, and pick out his curled-up form with a pin? or let him go crawling about the rocks, feeding upon the delicate earlier growth of marine vegetation? In the former case, you will have to reject the little kind of horny scale attached to his foot, which forms, when he retires into his habitation, a closely-fitting door to make all snug.

This is the most common example we have of the family Turbinidæ, which includes, according to Cuvier, all species that have a shell that is completely and regularly turbinated, meaning twisted if we translate it from Latin to English. The little Periwinkle (here he is) isn’t exactly a good-looking mollusk, but some of his relatives are quite beautiful, as we'll show shortly.[30] Naturalists call him T. littoreus, from littoralis—meaning of the shore—and he's often eaten by kids with great enjoyment; however, he's not very easy to digest and can sometimes cause serious issues. Swedish peasants believe that when the Periwinkle climbs high on the rocks, a storm is on the way from the south; however, Linnæus cites a Norwegian author to show that, according to popular belief, it actually predicts a land breeze with calm waters. People can learn a lot about changes in nature by observing the movements and habits of living creatures, which are guided by God to ensure their safety and needs, and often notice signs of calm and storm, rain and drought, much earlier than humans do. But what about our little Turbo? Will you boil him and poke out his curled-up body with a pin, or let him roam around the rocks munching on the early delicate marine plants? If you choose the first option, you'll need to get rid of the small, hard scale that’s attached to his foot, which acts as a snug door when he retreats into his shell.

Several species of this genus are found on our shores; one of those is the Turbo rudis, or Red Turbo, which has a very thick periwinkle-like shell, about three-quarters of an inch long; the colour is dull red, fawn, or drab.

Several species of this genus can be found along our shores; one of them is the Turbo rudis, or Red Turbo, which has a very thick shell similar to a periwinkle, about three-quarters of an inch long; the color is a dull red, tan, or drab.

Of the foreign Turbinæ, sometimes called Turban Shells, we will now introduce two or three species, which will be found on Plate III. Fig. 3 is the Marbled Turbo, (T. marmoratus,) from the Latin marmor—marble; a large handsome shell well known to conchologists, and a native of the Indian seas. Fig. 4 is the Twisted Turbo, (T. torquatus;) this shell, when deprived of its outer coat or layer, is beautifully nacreous, or if we may so speak, mother-of-pearly. The specimens which have reached England were brought from King George’s Sound. Fig. 5 is called Cook’s Turbo, (T. Cookii:) this is a handsome South Sea shell, oftentimes of large size. It has been found in great numbers on the coast of New Zealand.

Of the foreign Turbinæ, often referred to as Turban Shells, we will now introduce two or three species that can be found on Plate III. Fig. 3 is the Marbled Turbo, (T. marmoratus), from the Latin marmor—marble; it’s a large and beautiful shell well known to shell collectors and is native to the Indian seas. Fig. 4 is the Twisted Turbo, (T. torquatus); this shell, when stripped of its outer coat, is stunningly nacreous, or as we might say, mother-of-pearl. The specimens that have arrived in England were taken from King George’s Sound. Fig. 5 is called Cook’s Turbo, (T. Cookii); this is an attractive South Sea shell, often quite large. It has been found in great numbers along the coast of New Zealand.

On Plate IV, we have placed two very curiously formed and marked shells, called Wentletraps, also belonging to the family Turbinidæ. The scientific name is Scalaria, from the Latin scala—a ladder, which the ribbed shells are supposed to resemble. Of this genus there are about eighty distinct[31] species known; they are mostly deep-sea shells found in warm latitudes, although several inhabit the European seas, and one, the Common False Wentletrap, (S. communis,) Fig. 1, may often be picked up on our own shores. Fig. 2, the Royal Staircase Wentletrap, is a rare and valuable shell, generally brought from India and China; the scientific name is S. pretiosa, given to it by the French Naturalist Lamarck, on account of the high price which it fetched, pretiose, in Latin, meaning costly, valuable. As much as £100 have been given for a single specimen of this shell; and a fine one, especially if it exceed two inches in length, yet commands a considerable sum, although not nearly so much as that. A good deal like the False Wentletrap in general outline, is the Awl-shaped Turritella, found in the African and Indian Seas. This is the T. terebra of naturalists; the first name referring to the turret shape common to the genus, and the last being the Latin word for an auger, or piercer. The Roseate Turritella, (T. rosea,) is also sometimes seen in collections; the beautiful rosy tint of the live shell changes to a dull red or brown, on the death of the mollusk.

On Plate IV, we have placed two uniquely shaped and marked shells called Wentletraps, which also belong to the family Turbinidæ. The scientific name is Scalaria, derived from the Latin scala—meaning ladder, as the ribbed shells are thought to resemble one. There are about eighty distinct species of this genus known; they are mostly deep-sea shells found in warm waters, although several species live in European seas, and one, the Common False Wentletrap, (S. communis,) Fig. 1, can often be found on our own shores. Fig. 2, the Royal Staircase Wentletrap, is a rare and valuable shell, usually imported from India and China; its scientific name is S. pretiosa, given to it by the French naturalist Lamarck, due to the high price it commands, with pretiose in Latin meaning costly or valuable. As much as £100 has been paid for a single example of this shell; and a fine one, especially if it exceeds two inches in length, can still fetch a significant amount, although not nearly that much. Similar in general shape to the False Wentletrap is the Awl-shaped Turritella, found in the African and Indian Seas. This is the T. terebra of naturalists; the first name refers to the turret shape common to the genus, and the last is the Latin word for an auger or piercer. The Roseate Turritella, (T. rosea,) is also occasionally seen in collections; the beautiful rosy hue of the live shell fades to a dull red or brown after the mollusk dies.

TROCHUS, OR TOP-SHELL.

“Of the shelled Mollusca which the dredge ever and anon brings up,” says Mr. Gosse, in his delightful volume on the Aquarium, or Aqua-vivarium, as the glass tank in which living marine animals and vegetables are kept, is called, from the Latin aqua—water, and vivo—to live, “the Trochi are among the most conspicuous for beauty. The chief glory of this genus is the richly-painted internal surface of their shells, in which they are not excelled by any even of the true margaritiferous or pearly bivalves.”

“Of the shelled mollusks that the dredge occasionally brings up,” says Mr. Gosse in his delightful book on the Aquarium, or Aqua-vivarium, which is the glass tank where living marine animals and plants are kept, named from the Latin aqua—water, and vivo—to live, “the Trochi are among the most strikingly beautiful. The main highlight of this genus is the beautifully painted inner surface of their shells, which no one can surpass, even among the true margaritiferous or pearly bivalves.”

Of this Trochidæ family, a few of the members must be introduced to our readers; it is rather a numerous one, consisting of more than one hundred species, which are scattered nearly all over the world, few seas being without some of them. They are found at various depths, from near the surface to forty-five fathoms down, creeping on rocks, sand, masses of sea-weed, etc. We will first speak of those found on our[32] own shores, the two commonest, as well as the smallest of which, are the Grey and the Spotted Trochi, scientifically named T. cinerarius and T. maculata, the translation of the first Latin specific name being ashy or ash-coloured, and that of the second, spotted. Trochus, in the same language signifies a top, and has reference to the shape of most of these shells, which are something like a boy’s whip-top.

Of this Trochidæ family, we need to introduce a few members to our readers; it’s quite a large family, with over a hundred species found all around the globe, almost every sea has some of them. They inhabit various depths, from just below the surface to forty-five fathoms deep, crawling on rocks, sand, seaweed, and more. We'll first discuss those found on our [32] own shores. The two most common, and the smallest of these, are the Grey and the Spotted Trochi, scientifically known as T. cinerarius and T. maculata. The first Latin name translates to ashy or ash-colored, while the second means spotted. In Latin, Trochus means a top, which refers to the shape of most of these shells, resembling a boy’s spinning top.

Children on the coast sometimes call the last-named of the above species Pepper-and-salt Shells, because in colour they resemble the cloth so named. The Muddy-red Trochus, (T. ziziphinus,) so called, perhaps, because in colour it resembles the ziziphia, or fruit of the jujube tree, is also common with us. This shell is about an inch long, of a grey tint dashed with dark spots, these follow the line of the spiral turnings, which are very regular, proceeding from the opening below to the apex or point. Seen on shore, its colours are dull and faint, but beneath the water, inhabited by a living mollusk, it looks as though made of pearl, and studded with rubies; the animal, too, is richly coloured, being yellow with black stripes.—See Plate IV, Fig. 3.

Children along the coast sometimes refer to the last type mentioned above as Pepper-and-Salt Shells because their color reminds them of the fabric by that name. The Muddy-red Trochus, (T. ziziphinus), gets its name probably because its color resembles the fruit of the jujube tree, called ziziphia, and is also common in our area. This shell is about an inch long, with a grey hue marked by dark spots that follow the spiral lines, which are very regular, running from the opening at the bottom to the pointed top. When seen on the shore, its colors appear dull and faint, but when it's underwater and home to a live mollusk, it shines like pearl and seems adorned with rubies; the creature itself is vividly colored, being yellow with black stripes.—See Plate IV, Fig. 3.

Not so common as the last is another British mollusk of this genus, called the Granulated Trochus, (T. granulatus.) It is the larger, and, as many think, the more elegant shell of the two, being in colour, a faint flesh tint or yellowish white, shaded here and there with purple; the spiral lines which encircle it are composed of small round knobs which stand out like beads.

Not as common as the last one is another British mollusk from this genus, called the Granulated Trochus, (T. granulatus.) It is the larger and, according to many, the more elegant shell of the two, featuring a color that’s a pale flesh tone or yellowish white, with purple shading in places. The spiral lines wrapping around it are made up of small round knobs that stick out like beads.

There is a singular shell of this genus, called the Carrier Trochus, (T. phorus;) it is generally found loaded with foreign objects, such as shells, small stones, bits of coral, etc., which it attaches to itself, and so goes about like a collector of natural curiosities, with his cabinet on his back.

There’s a unique shell from this genus, known as the Carrier Trochus (T. phorus); it’s usually seen carrying various objects like shells, small stones, and bits of coral, which it sticks to itself. It moves around like a collector of natural curiosities, with its collection on its back.

The Imperial Trochus, (T. imperialis,) Fig. 4, whose scientific name explains itself, is one of the handsomest shells of the genus; it is very rare, and has hitherto been found only at New Zealand. Let us give our young readers a specimen of the way in which scientific writers describe shells; thus, this foreign Trochus, they tell us is “orbicularly conical, the apex obtuse, the whorls turgidly convex, squamoso radiate at the margin.” This is quite a simple affair to some descriptions,[33] and simple in fact it is to one, who, by attentive study, has become familiarized with the meaning of the terms. To one also who is acquainted with the Greek and Latin tongues, they will be sufficiently plain, although he has never seen them applied before, for they are all derived from those dead languages, as they are called, and so convey their own meaning to every educated naturalist, no matter of what nation he may be; and hence their chief value. It is not necessary for our readers to trouble themselves about the meaning of such terms at present; by and by it will be necessary for them to do so, if they wish to prosecute the study of any natural science.

The Imperial Trochus, (T. imperialis,) Fig. 4, whose scientific name speaks for itself, is one of the most beautiful shells in its genus; it is very rare and has only been found in New Zealand so far. Let’s show our young readers an example of how scientific writers describe shells; this foreign Trochus, they say, is “orbicular conical, with a blunt apex, turgidly convex whorls, and squamous radiate at the margin.” This is relatively straightforward compared to some descriptions,[33] and indeed, it is simple for someone who has studied these terms carefully and understands their meanings. For those familiar with Greek and Latin, the terms will be clear enough, even if they haven’t seen them used before, as they are all derived from those so-called dead languages, thus conveying their own meanings to any educated naturalist, regardless of their nationality; this is their primary value. Our readers don’t need to worry about the meanings of these terms right now; later on, it will be important for them to do so if they want to continue studying any natural science.

But about the Imperial Trochus, with its “orbicularly conical” shell—that term we may explain as round and cone-like; a reference to Fig. 4, Plate IV, will shew what is meant by this more clearly than words can, and likewise exhibit the beautiful markings of this species, with its ground tint of rich violet brown. This beauty is often obscured by calcarious incrustations, and marine plants, shewing that the mollusk is sluggish in its habits—a slothful creature. So it is with human beings, sloth covers and hides the good qualities and virtues with an overgrowth at all times difficult to remove, and oftentimes destructive of all that is fair and good in the character.—Children, be not slothful! The Obelisk Trochus, (T. obeliscus,) is a rare white and green shell, sometimes seen in collections; it is of a conico-pyramidal form, not remarkable for beauty, and is a native of the Indian seas.

But regarding the Imperial Trochus, with its “orbicularly conical” shell—that term means round and cone-like; a reference to Fig. 4, Plate IV, will show what is meant by this more clearly than words can, and will also display the beautiful markings of this species, featuring a rich violet-brown background. This beauty is often hidden by calcium deposits and marine plants, indicating that the mollusk is slow-moving—essentially a lazy creature. Similarly, with humans, laziness covers and conceals good qualities and virtues with an overgrowth that is always difficult to remove and often destructive to all that is beautiful and good in one's character.—Children, don’t be lazy! The Obelisk Trochus, (T. obeliscus), is a rare white and green shell, sometimes found in collections; it has a conico-pyramidal shape, is not particularly beautiful, and is native to the Indian seas.

Mr. Gosse speaks of the Tops and Winkles as among the most useful inhabitants of the Aquarium; they mow down with their rasping tongues the thick growth of Confervæ which would otherwise spread like a green curtain over the glass walls of the tank, and obstruct the view of its inhabitants. Here is this author’s description of the beautiful piece of mechanism by which this work is effected:—“The appearance and position of the organ would surprise any one who searched for it for the first time, and as it is easily found, and as Periwinkles are no rarities, let me commend it to your examination. The easiest mode of extracting it, supposing you are looking for it alone, is to slit the thick muzzle between the two tentacles, when the point of a needle will catch and draw out what looks like a slender white thread, two inches[34] or more in length, one end of which is attached to the throat, and the other, which is free, you will see coiled in a beautiful spiral manner, within the cavity of the stomach.

Mr. Gosse describes the Tops and Winkles as some of the most useful residents of the Aquarium; they use their rough tongues to cut down the thick growth of Confervæ, which would otherwise spread like a green curtain over the glass walls of the tank, blocking the view of its inhabitants. Here’s the author’s description of the wonderful mechanism by which this happens:—“The appearance and position of the organ would surprise anyone who looks for it for the first time, and since it can be easily found, and since Periwinkles are quite common, let me suggest you take a closer look. The easiest way to extract it, if you’re looking for it alone, is to make a slit in the thick muzzle between the two tentacles, when the tip of a needle will catch and pull out what looks like a slender white thread, two inches[34] or more in length, one end of which is attached to the throat, while the other, which is free, you’ll find coiled in a lovely spiral inside the stomach cavity.

By allowing this tiny thread to stretch itself on a plate of glass, which is easily done by putting a drop of water on it first, which may then be drained off and dried, you will find that it is in reality an excessively delicate ribbon, of transparent cartilaginous substance or membrane, on which are set spinous teeth of glassy texture and brilliancy. They are perfectly regular, and arranged in three rows, of which the middle ones are three-pointed, while on each of the outer rows a three-pointed tooth alternates with a larger curved one, somewhat boat-like in form. All the teeth project from the surface of the tongue on hooked curves, and all point in the same direction.”

By allowing this tiny thread to stretch out on a glass plate, which is easy to do by first putting a drop of water on it—then draining and drying it—you'll discover that it's actually an extremely delicate ribbon made of a transparent, cartilaginous material or membrane. This ribbon has sharp, glassy teeth that shine brightly. They are perfectly arranged in three rows; the middle row has three-pointed teeth, while each of the outer rows alternates between a three-pointed tooth and a larger curved one, which is somewhat boat-shaped. All the teeth curve upwards from the surface of the tongue and point in the same direction.

And with this curious piece of mechanism the little Winkle works away and cuts down swathe after swathe of the minute vegetation, just as a mower does the meadow grass; only the mollusk eats as he goes, and so gets payment for his labour; the man has it in another and to him more useful form. We might tell a very long story about these Tops and Winkles, which are nearly related to each other, but must now pass on to describe the rest of the shells on Plate IV, which are the Perspective Solarium, (S. perspectivum,) Fig. 5, the generic name comes from sol—the sun, and viewed perspectively, that is, in such a position that the whole top of the shell is at once presented to the view, looking like a flat surface, it presents a circular appearance, marked with rings and rays like representations of the sun sometimes do.

And with this interesting little machine, the small Winkle keeps on cutting down swath after swath of tiny plants, just like a mower does in a meadow; except the mollusk eats as it goes, earning its keep in the process. The human gets it in a different, more useful form. We could tell a very long story about these Tops and Winkles, which are closely related, but we’ll move on to describe the rest of the shells on Plate IV, which include the Perspective Solarium, (S. perspectivum,) Fig. 5. The generic name comes from sol—the sun, and when viewed from a certain angle, where the entire top of the shell is visible and appears flat, it looks circular, marked with rings and rays like some representations of the sun.

The Variegated Solarium, (S. variegatum,) Fig. 6, is a small but very pretty shell, somewhat rare. The mollusk is remarkable on account of the singular shape of its operculum, which differs from that of all other species; it is of a cone-shape, and covered from top to bottom with what are called membranous lamellæ, that appear to stand out like little shelves winding up spirally. This singular form of operculum has been long known to naturalists, but it is not until lately that they have discovered to what species of testacean it belonged. Let us here explain that operculus is the Latin for a cover or lid.

The Variegated Solarium, (S. variegatum,) Fig. 6, is a small but very attractive shell that’s somewhat rare. The mollusk stands out because of its unique operculum shape, which is unlike any other species; it has a cone shape and is covered from top to bottom with membranous lamellæ that look like little shelves spiraling upward. This unusual operculum shape has been known to naturalists for a long time, but it’s only recently that they’ve figured out which species it belongs to. Just to clarify, operculus is Latin for a cover or lid.

[35]

[35]

CONES, VOLUTES, MITRES, AND OLIVES.

These are names given by collectors to certain classes of univalve shells distinguished by peculiarities of formation, more or less distinct. We shall describe two or three of each, that our readers may have some idea of the meaning of the terms which are often used by those who speak or write on conchology.

These are names used by collectors for specific types of univalve shells, identified by unique features that can vary in clarity. We'll describe two or three examples of each so our readers can understand the meanings of the terms frequently used by those who discuss or write about conchology.

The family of Cones, called Conidæ, is an extensive one, considerably above two hundred species having been discovered. Many of them are very beautiful both in shape and colour, so that they are highly valued by collectors; they are principally found in the southern and tropical seas, upon sandy bottoms, at depths varying from a few feet to seventeen fathoms. The shells are generally thick and solid, rolled up, as it were, into a conical form; the most familiar illustration that can be given of this form is a sugar-loaf, which all these shells more or less resemble in general outline, as thus—

The Cones family, known as Conidæ, is a large group, with over two hundred species identified. Many of them are stunning in both shape and color, making them highly sought after by collectors. They are mostly found in southern and tropical seas, resting on sandy bottoms at depths ranging from a few feet to seventeen fathoms. The shells are typically thick and sturdy, coiled into a conical shape; the most common comparison for this shape is a sugar loaf, which resembles these shells in general outline, as follows—

Two Conidæ

Cones are either plain or coronated, that is, crowned, having rows of projections round the top of the shell, like the second of the above figures; and this forms a mark of division into two classes, although these classes often run, as it were, one into the other; some plain cones having slight irregularities of surface, and some crowned ones being very nearly plain.

Cones can be either plain or crowned, meaning they have rows of projections around the top of the shell, similar to the second image mentioned above. This creates a distinction between two classes, although these classes often blend into each other; some plain cones have slight surface irregularities, while some crowned ones are almost plain.

The Common, or Ordinary Cone, (Conus generalis,) Plate V. Fig. 1, is an elegantly-shaped and beautifully-marked shell, having much the appearance of being carved out of some rare kind of marble. The Lettered Cone, (Conus littoralis,) Fig. 2, appears to be scribbled over with Hebrew, Greek, or Arabic characters, and almost every species has something peculiar in its markings; clouds and veins, and dots, and stripes, and bands, of every conceivable shape and mode of arrangement,[36] may be met with in these shells, whose surface, when the epidermis, or outer skin is removed, bears a beautiful polish. Curious names have been given to some of them, such, for instance, as the High Admiral, Vice Admiral, and Guinea Admiral, which indicate the rank they hold in the estimation of collectors. From five to twenty guineas is the price at which good and rare ones have been valued, and one, the Conus cedo nulli, which may be translated, the Cone second to none, has fetched the enormous sum of three hundred guineas. It must not be supposed that these shells exhibit all their beauties when, inhabited by a carnivorous, or flesh-eating mollusk, they move slowly about, or lie for a time motionless among the rocks and sand-beds of the ocean. The before-mentioned epidermis, which is the Latin for the outer skin of the human body, covers them like a cloak or mantle, which is the name it bears among naturalists. Much careful labour is required to bring them to a fit state for cabinet shells.

The Common, or Ordinary Cone, (Conus generalis), Plate V. Fig. 1, is a beautifully shaped and well-patterned shell that looks like it was carved from some rare kind of marble. The Lettered Cone, (Conus littoralis), Fig. 2, seems to be covered with scribbles of Hebrew, Greek, or Arabic characters, and almost every species has some unique feature in its markings; clouds and veins, dots, stripes, and bands in every imaginable shape and arrangement,[36] can be found in these shells, whose surfaces, when the epidermis, or outer skin, is removed, have a lovely polish. Some of them have curious names, like the High Admiral, Vice Admiral, and Guinea Admiral, indicating their rank in the eyes of collectors. Prices for good and rare ones range from five to twenty guineas, and one, the Conus cedo nulli, which translates to "the Cone second to none," has sold for an astounding three hundred guineas. It's important to note that these shells don’t show all their beauty while they’re inhabited by a meat-eating mollusk, as they slowly move around or stay still among the rocks and sand of the ocean. The previously mentioned epidermis, which is Latin for the outer skin of the human body, acts like a cloak or mantle over them, which is the term used by naturalists. A lot of careful work is needed to prepare them for display as cabinet shells.

Volutes form an extensive family of shells under the name Volutinæ. The greater part are natives of tropical seas, and dwell far down so that they are seldom found on the coast, except after storms. There are a few European species, but these are not remarkable for beauty, as most of the others are. The generic name signifies twisted, or rather wreathed, as flowers or leaves might be, about some central object. In these shells the spire is generally short, as it is in many cones, sometimes scarcely apparent; the form is usually elegant, and the markings often striking and handsome. On Plate V, will be found three examples—Fig. 3 is the Undulated Volute, (V. undulata,) the Latin for a little wave is undula, and these marks are like the lines caused by the flowing of the waves on a sandy shore: this shell is found chiefly in the South Pacific; the animal which inhabits it is prettily-marked with zebra-like stripes. Fig. 4 is called the Pacific Volute, (V. Pacificus;) the shape, it will be seen, is somewhat different, being more angular, and it is without the waved lines. Fig. 5, the Bat Volute, (V. vespertilio,) is more decidedly knobbed or spiked, approaching nearly to the shape of some of the coronated ones. This species is found in the Indian seas; the specific name is the Latin for a bat.

Volute shapes are a large family of shells known as Volutinæ. Most of them are found in tropical seas and live at great depths, so they're rarely seen along the coast except after storms. There are a few species in Europe, but they aren't particularly beautiful like many of the others. The name of the family means twisted, or more like wreathed, as flowers or leaves might be around a central point. In these shells, the spire is usually short, similar to many cones, sometimes barely noticeable; their shape is often elegant, and their markings are often striking and attractive. On Plate V, you'll find three examples—Fig. 3 is the Undulated Volute, (V. undulata); "undula" in Latin means a little wave, and the markings resemble the lines created by flowing waves on a sandy beach: this shell is mainly found in the South Pacific; the creature that lives inside it has nicely patterned, zebra-like stripes. Fig. 4 is called the Pacific Volute, (V. Pacificus); its shape is somewhat different, being more angular and lacking the wavy lines. Fig. 5, the Bat Volute, (V. vespertilio), is more distinctly knobby or spiked, closely resembling some of the coronated varieties. This species is found in the Indian seas; its specific name is Latin for bat.

[37]

[37]

Mitres; these are usually considered as a genus, or branch of the Volute family; the scientific name is mitra, the form is generally long, slender, and pointed—something like the bishop’s mitre, hence the common name of the genus. In the Episcopal Mitre, (M. episcopalis,) Plate VI, Fig. 1, we see this form in its greatest perfection; this is a handsome shell found in the Indian seas, and on the coasts of the South Sea Islands. The mollusk is remarkable for a long proboscis, double the length of the shell, the extremity of which swells into a club form, and has an oval orifice or opening: the specific name episcopalis, comes from the Latin, and means of, or like a bishop. The Tanned Mitre, (M. adusta,) from the Latin adustus—burned or parched, is, what is called fusiform and turretted, that is, shaped like a spindle, and having a spire or turret-like termination. The streaks of colour are transverse, that is, running the length of the shell, or in other words, they are longitudinal; this, too, comes from the South Sea Islands. Fig. 2 is the Wrinkled Mitre, (M. corrugata,) from the Latin corrugo—to wrinkle; it is very different both in shape and markings, from the last species; the whorls, it will be seen, are angulated or pointed above, and the lower part of the shell is much larger than the spiral or upper portion. It is a true mitre nevertheless, although not just such a one as a bishop would like to wear. It inhabits the Indian Ocean, the coast of New Guinea, etc.

Miters; these are typically seen as a type or branch of the Volute family; the scientific name is mitra. They usually have a long, slender, and pointed shape—similar to a bishop’s mitre, which is how the genus got its common name. In the Episcopal Mitre, (M. episcopalis,) Plate VI, Fig. 1, we see this form at its best; it’s a beautiful shell found in the Indian seas and around the coasts of the South Sea Islands. The mollusk has a long proboscis that is twice the length of the shell, with the end swelling into a club shape and featuring an oval opening: the specific name episcopalis comes from Latin and means of, or like a bishop. The Tanned Mitre, (M. adusta), derived from the Latin adustus—burned or parched, is spindle-shaped and turretted, meaning it has a spindle-like shape and a turret-like end. The color streaks are transverse, which means they run the length of the shell, or in other words, longitudinal; this one also comes from the South Sea Islands. Fig. 2 is the Wrinkled Mitre, (M. corrugata), from the Latin corrugo—to wrinkle; it looks quite different in both shape and markings compared to the last species; the whorls are pointed at the top, and the lower part of the shell is much larger than the spiral or upper part. It is still a true mitre, even though it’s not quite the kind a bishop would want to wear. This species lives in the Indian Ocean, along the coast of New Guinea, etc.

Olives; these, for richness of colour and brilliancy of effect, will bear comparison with any genus of shells. Naturalists speak of them collectively as Olivinæ; they belong to the Volute family, and are said to number about eighty species. Most of those which have reached this country, have come from the Mauritius, where they catch them with lines baited with portions of Cuttle-fish. We have here depicted two of them, namely, the Figured Olive, Fig. 3, (Oliva textilina,) from the Latin textilus, which is woven or plaited; and the Ruddy Olive, Fig. 4, (O. sanguinolenta,) from sanguis—blood.

Olives; these, with their rich colors and brilliant appearance, can compete with any type of shell. Naturalists refer to them collectively as Olivinæ; they are part of the Volute family and are said to have around eighty species. Most of the ones that have arrived in this country came from Mauritius, where they are caught using lines baited with pieces of cuttlefish. Here, we show two of them: the Figured Olive, Fig. 3, (Oliva textilina), derived from the Latin textilus, meaning woven or plaited; and the Ruddy Olive, Fig. 4, (O. sanguinolenta), from sanguis—blood.

We must now bring our notice of the Univalves to a conclusion; there are several genera, and many very curious and beautiful species which we have been unable to notice at all, and of those which we have, a short account only could be given; sufficient however, as we trust, to interest our readers[38] in the subject, and induce them to continue the study of it into larger works. Before leaving this division of shells, we would call their attention to one of its greatest ornaments, that is the Ventricose Harp Shell, (Harpa ventricosa,) from the Latin ventriculus—the stomach, applied to this shell on account of its swelled or inflated shape. Nothing, however, can be more elegant than the whole form, nor more beautiful than the markings of this lovely species, (see Plate VI, Fig. 5,) which belongs properly to the Whelk family.

We now need to wrap up our discussion of the Univalves. There are several genera and many unique and beautiful species that we haven't been able to cover, and for those we have mentioned, we could only provide a brief overview. However, we hope this is enough to engage our readers in the topic and encourage them to explore it further in more extensive works. Before we move on from this category of shells, we want to highlight one of its most stunning examples, the Ventricose Harp Shell (Harpa ventricosa), named from the Latin ventriculus—meaning stomach—because of its swollen shape. Nothing is more elegant than its overall form, and its markings are more beautiful than those of this lovely species (see Plate VI, Fig. 5), which is part of the Whelk family.

COWRIES.

Of Cowries we have already spoken in our chapter on the Uses of Shells, they are among the commonest of our testaceous ornaments, and are remarkable, especially the foreign kinds, for richness and diversity of colour, and the high polish which they bear. The native species are small plain shells, commonly called Pigs, from some real or fancied resemblance which they bear to the swine; they are pretty little white-ribbed shells, and are tolerably plentiful on various parts of the British coasts. There are three kinds, namely, the Louse Pig, or Nun Cowry, the Flesh-coloured, and European Pig Cowries. The first of these is of a pale reddish colour, with six square black spots on the back; the second is a beautiful rose tint; and the third is ash-coloured or pinkish, with three black dots, and a white streak down the back. The Money Cowry, (Cypræa moneta,) used as current coin in many parts of India, as well as on the coast of Guinea, is a yellow and white shell, with a single band of the former colour; it is small of size, and is sometimes called the Trussed Chicken, for the same reason as the term Pigs is applied to its British relatives. These Cowries are obtained principally about the Phillippine Islands, the Maldive Islands, and the coast of Congo, where, after high tides, the women collect them in baskets mixed with sand, from which they are afterwards separated and cleaned, when they are ready for the market.

Of Cowries, we've already talked about in our chapter on the Uses of Shells. They are among the most common decorative shells, and the foreign varieties stand out for their rich, diverse colors and shiny surfaces. The native types are small, simple shells, often referred to as Pigs due to their perceived resemblance to pigs; they are nice little white-ribbed shells and can be found fairly abundantly along various parts of the British coasts. There are three types: the Louse Pig or Nun Cowry, the Flesh-colored Cowry, and the European Pig Cowry. The first is a pale reddish color with six square black spots on its back; the second has a beautiful rose tint; and the third is grayish or pinkish with three black dots and a white streak down its back. The Money Cowry (Cypræa moneta), used as currency in many parts of India and along the coast of Guinea, is a yellow and white shell with a single band of yellow; it's small and is sometimes called the Trussed Chicken, similar to how the term Pigs is used for its British counterparts. These Cowries are mainly collected around the Philippine Islands, the Maldive Islands, and the coast of Congo, where, after high tides, women gather them in baskets mixed with sand, which is later separated and cleaned before they are ready for sale.

They are only useful as coin so long as they remain unbroken. The value of a single shell is very small, as the[39] following table will shew:—Four Cowries make one gunder; twenty Gunders one punn; four Punns one anna; four Annas one cahaun; and four Cahauns one rupee. The value of the latter coin is equal to two shillings and threepence, English money, and this would be exchangeable for five thousand one hundred and twenty Cowries; so that it would never do to pay large sums in this kind of coin: a waggon would be required to convey a few pounds with. In this country the Money Cowries are frequently used as markers or counters in social games; they are generally white, in shape rather broad and flat, being much spread out round the edges, which are slightly puckered, like frills. Here are two figures of the shell, exhibiting the back and front view.

They are only useful as currency as long as they stay unbroken. The value of a single shell is very low, as the[39] following table will show: Four Cowries equal one gunder; twenty Gunders equal one punn; four Punns equal one anna; four Annas equal one cahaun; and four Cahauns equal one rupee. The value of the rupee is about two shillings and threepence in British money, which would be worth five thousand one hundred and twenty Cowries. So, it wouldn't be practical to pay large amounts in this type of coin; you'd need a wagon to carry a few pounds. In this country, Money Cowries are often used as markers or counters in social games. They are typically white, broad and flat in shape, with edges that spread out slightly and are puckered like frills. Here are two figures of the shell, showing the back and front view.

Money Cowrie, two views

On Plate VII, will be found a group of other Foreign Cowries, most of which will be recognized as familiar ornaments of the mantel and side-board. Fig. 1 is the Spotted or Leopard Cowry, sometimes also called the Tiger Cowry, (C. tigris,) which, in the earlier stages of its growth, is simply marked with broad bands of lighter colour across the shell. Fig. 2, the Map Cowry, (C. mappa,) curiously marked and shaded, so as to resemble a coloured map; there are several varieties of this beautiful shell, such as the rosy and dark variety from the Pearl Islands, in the Indian Ocean; the Citron and Dwarf Rich-mouthed variety, from the Mauritius. Fig. 3, the Mole Cowry, (C. talpa,) the last word being the Latin for a mole, is of a more slender form than most other species of the Cypræidæ family, so called on account of their beauty, Cyprea being a name of Venus, the goddess of beauty. Any one who has seen a mole, must be struck with the resemblance of its general[40] outline to this shell, of which there is a darker-coloured variety of somewhat stouter form, called exustus—burned or scorched. Of the Poached-egg Cowries there are several species, the most common is called by naturalists Ovulum ovum, Fig. 4, from ovum—an egg; the back of this shell is much elevated and rounded; it is smooth and white; the inside is orange brown. Some of the Poached-egg group are of a more slender and angular shape, as, for instance, that called the Gibbous, (O. Gibbosa;) the moon when more than half-full, is called gibbous, that is rounded unequally, as this shell.

On Plate VII, you'll find a group of other Foreign Cowries, most of which are recognizable as familiar decorations for the mantel and side-board. Fig. 1 shows the Spotted or Leopard Cowry, sometimes known as the Tiger Cowry, (C. tigris), which, in its early growth stages, is marked with broad bands of lighter color across the shell. Fig. 2 is the Map Cowry, (C. mappa), uniquely marked and shaded to look like a colored map; there are several varieties of this beautiful shell, including the rosy and dark variety from the Pearl Islands in the Indian Ocean, and the Citron and Dwarf Rich-mouthed variety from Mauritius. Fig. 3 is the Mole Cowry, (C. talpa), with the last word being Latin for a mole. It has a more slender shape than most other species of the Cypræidæ family, which is named for their beauty, as Cyprea is a name for Venus, the goddess of beauty. Anyone who has seen a mole will notice how similar its general outline is to this shell, which also has a darker-colored variety that is somewhat sturdier, called exustus—burned or scorched. The Poached-egg Cowries include several species, the most common being known by naturalists as Ovulum ovum, Fig. 4, from ovum—meaning egg; the back of this shell is very elevated and rounded, smooth and white, while the inside is orange-brown. Some of the Poached-egg group are more slender and angular, like the one called Gibbous, (O. Gibbosa); the term "gibbous" refers to the moon when it's more than half-full, meaning it's rounded unevenly, just like this shell.

O. Gibbosa, a cowrie

Few shells undergo greater changes, both of shape and colour, during the process of growth, than the Cowries, which are called in France Porcelaines, on account of their high polish and brilliant hues; a single species in different stages of development, might well be, and often is, taken for distinct shells. Much might be said about the Mollusks which inhabit them, but our present subject has rather to do with their outer covering than their internal structure. The most rare and valuable, if not the most beautiful of these Cowries, is the C. aurora, or aurantium, Morning-dawn, or Orange Cowry, a perfect specimen of which has been sold for fifty guineas. There is a very curious shell called the Common Weaver’s Shuttle, (Oculum volva,) generally included in the Cyprea family; of this a representation will be found on Plate VII, Fig. 5. This is brought from China.

Few shells undergo more significant changes in both shape and color as they grow than Cowries, known as Porcelaines in France due to their high polish and vibrant hues; a single species at different growth stages could easily be mistaken for separate shells, and often is. There's a lot to discuss about the Mollusks that live in them, but our focus is more on their exterior than their internal structure. The rarest and most valuable, if not the most beautiful, of these Cowries is the C. aurora, or aurantium, also known as the Morning-dawn or Orange Cowry, with a perfect specimen having sold for fifty guineas. There's a very interesting shell called the Common Weaver’s Shuttle, (Oculum volva), typically classified in the Cyprea family; a representation can be found on Plate VII, Fig. 5. This shell is sourced from China.


[41]

[41]

BIVALVES.

Acephalous Mollusks, with Bivalve Shells, is the name given by modern naturalists to the class of animals of which we have now to speak; the only one of these terms which will require explanation is the first; it comes from the Greek, and means headless, so an Acephalan is a molluscous animal without a head, as

Acephalous Mollusks, with Bivalve Shells, is the term modern naturalists use for this class of animals that we will discuss now; the only term here that needs clarification is the first one. It comes from Greek and means headless, so an Acephalan is a mollusk without a head, as

THE OYSTER,

Which may be considered as the King of Bivalves; his palace, to be sure, is somewhat rough and rugged outside, but within, its walls are smooth and polished, lustrous and iridescent, and altogether beautiful; of a nacrous or pearly appearance, now flushing into a rose tint, now fading into pure white, and adorned sometimes with goodly pearls of price; truly this monarch of the Conchifers has a habitation worthy of a prince, wherein he lives in right royal state. Our readers may smile perhaps at the idea of the solitary Oyster doing this, down there on his mud bank or rocky anchorage ground, shut up in his dirty-looking shells, and holding, as it seems, commune with no one, not even his fellow mollusks; how can he be said to live in royal state, or indeed any state at all, except in a most weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable one? And this only shews how erroneously those often judge who do so hastily, and from first appearances.

Which can be seen as the King of Bivalves; his palace, sure, looks a bit rough and rugged on the outside, but inside, its walls are smooth and polished, shiny and colorful, and altogether beautiful; with a pearly appearance that sometimes flushes to a rose tint, then fades to pure white, and occasionally adorned with valuable pearls; truly, this monarch of the Conchifers has a home fit for a prince, where he lives in a royal way. Our readers might chuckle at the thought of the solitary Oyster doing this, down there on his mud bank or rocky spot, closed up in his dirty-looking shells, seemingly having no contact with anyone, not even his fellow mollusks; how can he be said to live in royal style, or any style at all, except in a weary, stale, flat, and unproductive one? And this just shows how often people judge incorrectly when they do so hastily and based on first impressions.

If we take a peep through a microscope, under the direction of a naturalist named Rymer Jones, we shall see that “the shell of an Oyster is a world occupied by an innumerable quantity of animals, compared to which the Oyster itself is a colossus. The liquid enclosed between the shell of the Oyster contains a multitude of embryos, covered with transparent scales, which swim with ease; a hundred and twenty of these embryos, placed side by side, would make an inch in breadth. This liquid contains besides, a great variety of animalculæ, five hundred times less in size, which give out a phosphoric light. Yet these are not the only inhabitants of this dwelling—there are also three distinct species of worms.”

If we take a look through a microscope, guided by a naturalist named Rymer Jones, we’ll see that “the shell of an oyster is a world filled with countless animals, compared to which the oyster itself is a giant. The liquid trapped between the oyster's shell contains a multitude of embryos, covered in transparent scales, that swim effortlessly; a hundred and twenty of these embryos lined up would measure an inch in width. This liquid also has a wide variety of tiny organisms, five hundred times smaller, that emit a phosphorescent light. But these aren't the only residents of this home—there are also three distinct species of worms.”

[42]

[42]

Let us see if there are any hard names here that want explaining before we go any further. The first we stumble upon is Colossus, which comes from the Latin, and means a great image or statue, like that which ancient historians tell us once bestrode the entrance to the harbour of Rhodes. Embryo comes from the Greek, and means something small and unfinished, that is to expand or grow into a more perfect form, as the seed into a plant. Animalculæ, are minute or very small animals, such as cannot be distinguished without the help of a microscope, hence they are sometimes called microscopic animals; this word comes from the Latin animalis, which means having life. Phosphoric signifies luminous, or giving out light. The Greek name of the morning star is Phospha. In Latin, Phosphorus is a term applied to a substance which chemists extract from bones and other animal matter, and which, when exposed to air, burns with a pale blue light, like that emitted by the glow-worm. Many of the oceanic or sea animalculæ are exceedingly phosphorescent, so that by night, the waves appear like billows of flame. Of this luminosity of the ocean, as it is termed, we shall have to speak on another occasion. We will now return to the Oyster, who, it will be seen, is by no means so solitary in his bivalve palace as might be supposed. He has his torch-bearers, and other attendants, quite a host of them, no doubt magnificently dressed, if we could but see them to advantage, and well instructed in the several duties which they have to perform. Oh yes, certainly, as the Irish poet has said,

Let’s see if there are any tricky terms here that need explaining before we go any further. The first one we come across is Colossus, which comes from Latin and means a huge image or statue, like the one ancient historians say once stood at the entrance of the harbor of Rhodes. Embryo comes from Greek and refers to something small and incomplete that is set to expand or develop into a more perfect form, like a seed turning into a plant. Animalculæ are tiny or very small animals that can’t be seen without a microscope, so they’re sometimes called microscopic animals; this term comes from the Latin animalis, which means having life. Phosphoric means luminous or giving off light. The Greek name for the morning star is Phospha. In Latin, Phosphorus refers to a substance that chemists extract from bones and other organic matter, which, when exposed to air, burns with a pale blue light, similar to that given off by a glow-worm. Many of the oceanic animalculæ are highly phosphorescent, so at night, the waves look like waves of flame. We’ll discuss this ocean luminosity at another time. Now let’s return to the Oyster, who, as you’ll see, isn’t nearly as solitary in his bivalve home as you might think. He has his torchbearers and other attendants—quite a crowd, no doubt magnificently dressed if we could see them properly, and well trained in the various tasks they need to carry out. Oh yes, indeed, as the Irish poet has said,

“Of all the Conchiferous shell-fish,
The Oyster is surely the King;”

Shall we continue the quotation? and say

Shall we keep going with the quote? And say

“Arrah Mick, call the people who sell fish,
And tell them a dozen to bring:
For it’s I that intend to demonstrate,
The creature’s phenomena strange,
Its functions to set every one straight,
And exhibit their structure and range.”

Scarcely will our limited space permit us to do this, but a few of the most remarkable particulars about this common[43] Acephalan, we feel called upon to set before our readers.

Scarcely will our limited space allow for this, but we feel it's important to share a few of the most notable details about this common[43] Acephalan with our readers.

First, then, it belongs to the class Conchifera; this is a word which we must stop to examine a little; it seems to come from the Latin concha, which means a shell-fish with two shells, in other words a bivalve mollusk. Second, our Oyster belongs to the class Pectinidæ. Now pecten is the Latin for a comb, and this class includes those bivalve shells whose edges are toothed, or, as it is said, pectinated; in the scallop and the cockle shells this peculiarity is more observable than in those of other members of the class, and these form the typical, or so to speak, pattern genus, pecten. Thirdly, the Common Oyster is a Monomyarian Conchifer. Ah! that’s something like a name for the acephaloid monarch! Look at these two words, mono-myarian, di-myarian, you know of course that mony-syllable means one syllable, and dis-syllable means two. You sometimes hear of a person who leads a monotonous life, and you think perhaps of the Oyster shut up in his shell all alone, one by himself; this notion you now know to be a false one; although it is true that he has but one abductor muscle, and therefore belongs to the division of the Pectinidæ family called Monomyaria, while the Pearl Oyster has two, and therefore belongs to that termed Dimyaria. If, as they say, there is reason in the roasting of eggs, surely there must be in the names given to the classes and divisions of shells. We hope to have succeeded in making the why and the wherefore in this case somewhat plain;—onetwo—and away we go out of this maze of hard names. But what about the abductor muscle, above spoken of? well, this must be explained; abduce, coming from the Latin abduco, means to separate, to draw away, hence we have abduction. During the life of an Oyster, the usual and natural state of the shell is that of being kept open for a little distance, to allow the water necessary for its nourishment and respiration to flow in and out; but as a security against danger, it was necessary to furnish the animal with the means of rapidly closing the shell, and retaining the valves in a closed state. These actions being only occasional, yet requiring considerable force, are effected by means of a muscular power, for which purpose one or two, or sometimes more strong muscles are placed between the valves, their fibres passing directly across from the[44] inner surface of one to that of the other, and firmly attached to both, and these are called the abductor muscles, because their office is to draw or pull; how strongly they do this those whose business it is to open Oysters can best tell; if the animal within were not alive, the process would not be a difficult one, as in that case the muscles would be relaxed, and the shell would come open of itself, so that actually people who eat Oysters directly they are opened, swallow them “all alive-O!”

First, it belongs to the class Conchifera; this term is worth examining a bit; it seems to come from the Latin concha, which means a shellfish with two shells, or a bivalve mollusk. Second, our Oyster is part of the class Pectinidæ. Now pecten is Latin for a comb, and this class includes those bivalve shells with toothed edges, or what is known as pectinated; in scallop and cockle shells, this characteristic is more noticeable than in other members of the class, and they form the typical, or pattern genus, pecten. Thirdly, the Common Oyster is a Monomyarian Conchifer. Ah! That’s quite a name for the acephaloid monarch! Look at these two terms, mono-myarian and di-myarian, you know that mono means one and di means two. You sometimes hear about someone leading a monotonous life, and you might think of the Oyster locked in its shell all alone, one by itself; this idea is now revealed to be incorrect; while it’s true that it has only one abductor muscle, putting it in the Pectinidæ family categorized as Monomyaria, the Pearl Oyster has two, hence belongs to the category called Dimyaria. If, as they say, there’s a reason behind the roasting of eggs, surely there must be a reason for the names given to the classes and divisions of shells. We hope we’ve made the reasons behind these terms a bit clearer;—onetwo—and let’s move on from this complicated naming. But what about the abductor muscle mentioned earlier? Well, this needs further explanation; abduce, from the Latin abduco, means to separate or draw away, thus we have abduction. In an Oyster’s life, the shell's natural state is to remain slightly open, allowing the water needed for nourishment and respiration to flow in and out; however, to protect against danger, the animal needs a way to quickly shut the shell and keep the valves closed. These actions, while occasional and needing considerable strength, are accomplished by muscular power, meaning one or more strong muscles are positioned between the valves, with their fibers running directly across from the inner side of one to the other, firmly secured to both, and these are known as the abductor muscles, because their function is to draw or pull; how forcefully they do this can best be told by those who open Oysters; if the creature inside weren’t alive, it would be much easier since the muscles would be relaxed, and the shell would naturally open, so essentially people who eat Oysters right after they’re opened consume them “all alive-O!”

If a pair of the shells from which the delicious morsel has been extracted, be taken in the hand, it may be noticed that one is much thinner, smoother, and flatter than the other; this is the side most exposed to the action of the water; the rougher and rounder side is that which is attached to the rock, or other substance to which the animal forms an attachment, that is usually life-long. The two portions of the shell are joined together by a hinge of curious workmanship, which is formed of the inner layer of the shell, and strengthened by a ligament which is wonderfully elastic; when the shell is drawn together by the abductor muscles, the ligament is at full stretch, and as soon as they relax at all, it contracts, and causes the shell to gape. This process is repeated as often as may be necessary for the safety and sustenance of the animal within, whose mouth is situated at the narrowest part of its habitation, namely, near the joint of the hinge, which connects its upper and under shell. The anatomical structure of the Oyster is more perfect than would be supposed, from its apparently low state of organization; it has a heart, liver, and intestinal canal, and a bag near the mouth, which answers the purpose of a stomach. Its breathing organs are gills, closely resembling those of most other fish; it has little vessels which convey the bile from the stomach to the liver, and may perhaps be subject to bilious attacks, as well as those who swallow this curious piece of organization at a mouthful, without thinking at all of the goodly structure they are demolishing. There is the tiny heart with its series of blood-vessels, just as perfect as in the larger animals. There are the nerves in the shape of minute feelers, which appear to be acutely sensible not only of actual contact with foreign bodies, but also of sounds and movements from without. A[45] very nice sense of feeling appears to reside in what is called the beard, in scientific language bissus; this is a kind of double fringe to the two lobes of the mantle, or sac, as it is called, which envelopes the body of the animal, and floats free from the shell, except just at the part nearer the valve where it is attached.

If you take a pair of shells from which the tasty meat has been removed, you'll notice that one shell is much thinner, smoother, and flatter than the other. This side is exposed to the water, while the rougher, rounder side is the one that’s attached to a rock or some other surface, which the animal clings to for its entire life. The two halves of the shell are connected by a hinge made with intricate craftsmanship, created from the inner layer of the shell and reinforced by a surprisingly elastic ligament. When the shell is closed by the abductor muscles, the ligament is fully stretched; once those muscles relax, the ligament contracts, causing the shell to open. This process repeats as often as needed for the safety and food of the animal inside, whose mouth is located at the narrowest part of its home, near the hinge joint that connects the upper and lower shells. The anatomy of the oyster is more advanced than you might expect given its seemingly simple structure; it has a heart, liver, intestinal canal, and a pouch near its mouth that acts like a stomach. Its breathing organs are gills, similar to those of many other fish; it has small vessels that carry bile from the stomach to the liver, so it might even experience bilious issues, just like those who consume this fascinating creature without considering the intricate structure they’re destroying. The tiny heart has its network of blood vessels, just as well-formed as those in larger animals. There are nerves that appear as tiny tendrils, which seem to be sensitive not only to physical contact with outside objects but also to sounds and movements around them. A very fine sense of touch seems to exist in what’s known as the beard, scientifically referred to as bissus; this is a kind of double fringe on the two lobes of the mantle, or sac, that surrounds the animal's body, floating free from the shell except at the point where it attaches near the valve.

We have just spoken of the beard of the Oyster, and this reminds us of a conundrum which may serve to amuse our readers, and enliven these dry details a little. Why is an Oyster the most anomalous, that is strange, contradictory, creature in existence? Do you give it up? Well then it is because

We just talked about the beard of the Oyster, and this brings to mind a riddle that might entertain our readers and make these boring details a bit more lively. Why is an Oyster the most peculiar, that is, strange and contradictory, creature in existence? Can't figure it out? Well then, it is because

“It wears a beard without any chin,
And leaves its bed to be tucked in.”

Again, by this allusion to the “tucking in” of Oysters, a phrase more expressive than polite, we have recalled to memory the saying of a quaint old author, that they are “ungodly, uncharitable, and unprofitable meat; ungodly, because they are eaten without grace; uncharitable, because they leave nothing but shells, and unprofitable because they must swim in wine.” Not, generally, however, are they eaten in this luxurious manner, a little pepper and vinegar is all they commonly get in the way of sauce, and those who swallow them thus accompanied, seem to do so with infinite relish. A very long chapter, if not a whole book, might be written about the historical associations of Oysters, for which our country has been famous, as far back as the time of the first Roman invasion; much, too, might be said about the Oyster beds and fisheries, which give employment to thousands of our industrious population, but all this has so little to do with natural history, that we can find no excuse for dwelling upon it here. It is quite within the range of our subject, however, to state that the “spat” or “spawn” of the Oyster is cast about the beginning of May: at first it resembles a drop of greenish tallow, but by the aid of the microscope it may be seen to consist of a great number of minute particles, each of which is an egg, and will by-and-by become a perfect fish; these increase in size very rapidly, and after floating about for a while, sink to the bottom, and become attached to rock or some other substance,[46] in which position, if not violently detached or removed, they complete their growth, and live out the term of their natural life. Their food is minute animalculæ, and microscopic vegetation, on the nature of which their flavour greatly depends.

Again, with this reference to the “tucking in” of oysters, a phrase that is more colorful than polite, we are reminded of an old saying by a quirky author who described them as “ungodly, uncharitable, and unprofitable food; ungodly because they are eaten without saying grace; uncharitable because they leave nothing but shells, and unprofitable because they must swim in wine.” Generally, though, they aren’t eaten in such a lavish way; a little pepper and vinegar is all they usually get in terms of sauce, and those who take them this way seem to enjoy it immensely. A lengthy chapter, or even a whole book, could be written about the historical significance of oysters, which our country has been known for since the time of the first Roman invasion; a lot could also be said about the oyster beds and fisheries that provide jobs for thousands of hardworking people. However, this isn’t really related to natural history, so we won’t linger on it here. It is relevant to mention, though, that the “spat” or “spawn” of the oyster is released around the beginning of May: at first, it looks like a drop of greenish wax, but under a microscope, you can see that it consists of many tiny particles, each an egg that will eventually develop into a full-grown oyster. These increase in size quickly, float around for a while, and then sink to the bottom, attaching themselves to rocks or other surfaces. If they aren’t violently disturbed or removed, they will grow and live out their natural lifespan. Their food consists of tiny microorganisms and microscopic plants, which greatly influence their flavor.

They have many enemies besides man; the whelk, and the crab, the sea-star, or “five fingers,” and the large drum-fish, which swallows them almost by the bushel, shells and all; these help to thin the Oyster-beds, and make the dredger’s labours less remunerative than they would otherwise be. Here is a picture of one as he stands in his boat just about to throw his dredge into the sandy bottom, where he knows the delicious testaceans do, or ought to, lie most thickly. The dredge, which is a triangular iron frame with a net over the bottom, will naturally sink, and when the line to which it is attached ceases to run out, the dredger will put his boat in motion, and draw it thus over the Oyster-bed, and then pull it up filled, it may be, with little fat “Miltons,” or large “Colchesters,” or such other kind as the spot is known to yield.

They have many enemies besides humans: the whelk, the crab, the sea star, or “five fingers,” and the large drumfish, which can swallow them almost by the bushel, shells and all. These predators help to reduce the Oyster beds, making the dredger’s work less rewarding than it could be. Here’s a picture of one as he stands in his boat, just about to throw his dredge into the sandy bottom, where he knows the delicious shellfish do, or should, lie most densely. The dredge, which is a triangular iron frame with a net on the bottom, will naturally sink. When the line it’s attached to stops running out, the dredger will move his boat and drag it over the Oyster bed, and then pull it up, which may be filled with little fat “Miltons,” or large “Colchesters,” or whatever kind the spot is known to produce.

Oyster dredger

The Latin for Oyster is Ostrea, and that is a name given to a genus of the Pectinidæ family, comprising beside the O. edulis, or Common Oyster, many other species. Edulis means eatable. Home naturalists divide these Ostraceans into two groups, first with simple or undulated, but not plaited valves; second, those which have the borders of their valves distinctly plaited.

The Latin word for Oyster is Ostrea, which refers to a genus in the Pectinidæ family, including the O. edulis, or Common Oyster, along with several other species. Edulis means edible. Local naturalists categorize these Oysters into two groups: the first has simple or wavy, but not folded, valves; the second has valves with clearly folded edges.

[47]

[47]

To the first group belong the Common Oyster, and between thirty and forty other living species which are found principally in warm and temperate latitudes. In the Polar ocean none have been discovered, and in the hotter climates they are most abundant, being found in large beds or banks near the coast, and often attached to rocks and even to trees which grow by the water, so that the accounts of some old travellers who stated that they saw Oysters growing upon trees, were not so false as many supposed them.

To the first group belong the Common Oyster and between thirty to forty other living species, mainly found in warm and temperate regions. None have been discovered in the Polar ocean, and they are most abundant in hotter climates, found in large beds or banks near the coast and often attached to rocks and even trees growing by the water. So, the stories from some old travelers who claimed to see Oysters growing on trees weren't as unbelievable as many thought.

Ostrea Crista-Galli, Cock’s-comb Oyster
Placuna Placenta, Chinese Window Oyster

The annexed figure is that of the Cock’s-comb Oyster, Ostrea Crista-Galli, a native of the Indian Seas, and a very remarkable shell, on account of its crooked or deeply indented form; the specific name means cock’s-crest. The Chinese Window Oyster, called Placuna Placenta, which we may, if[48] we like, translate into a pleasant or agreeable cake; the shell, it will be seen, is round like a cake, and its smoothness and regularity of form render it agreeable to look upon; this species too comes from the Indian Seas, where it is taken on sandy bottoms. The American Spiny Oyster, or Spondylus Americanus, brings us into another family, that of the Water Clams, called by naturalists Spondylidæ; with the spines stuck out every way, and no way in particular, it looks like a head of hair greatly in need of the assistance of one of its pectinated relatives. The specific name of this curious shell explains itself; the generic name comes from the Latin Spondylis—a kind of serpent.

The attached figure shows the Cock’s-comb Oyster, Ostrea Crista-Galli, which is found in the Indian Seas and is notable for its twisted or deeply indented shape; the specific name translates to cock’s-crest. The Chinese Window Oyster, known as Placuna Placenta, could also be translated into a pleasant or agreeable cake; as you can see, its shell is round like a cake, and its smoothness and regular shape make it visually appealing. This species also comes from the Indian Seas, where it's collected from sandy bottoms. The American Spiny Oyster, or Spondylus Americanus, belongs to a different family, the Water Clams, referred to by naturalists as Spondylidæ; with its spines jutting out in all directions, it resembles a messy head of hair in desperate need of help from one of its pectinated relatives. The specific name of this intriguing shell is self-explanatory, while the generic name originates from the Latin Spondylis—a type of serpent.

Spondylus Americanus, American Spiny Oyster

Passing over the family Malleidæ, or Hammer Oysters, we come to the Meleagrinidæ, or Pearl Oysters, of which Fig. 1, Plate VIII, is an example, this is the M. Margaritifera of naturalists, the mollusk in whose shells pearls are chiefly found. Here are two long words; Meleagris is the Latin for a Guinea or Turkey Hen, to the markings of whose plumage naturalists might have imagined the shells of this genus bore some resemblance. There was, says the mythology, a celebrated hero of antiquity named Meleaga, but we can hardly suppose that there is any association between his name and that of a genus of Oysters, of which edible we read the ancients were very fond, and they are said to have had a fancy not only for the mollusk itself, but also for the pearls found in its shell, which at their luxurious banquets they dissolved in wine, to make the draughts richer, or at all events more expensive; and this[49] brings us to the specific name of the Pearl Oyster, Margaritifera, which comes from the Latin Margarita—a pearl; the French use this word slightly altered in the spelling, thus Marguerite for both a daisy, and

Passing over the family Malleidæ, or Hammer Oysters, we arrive at the Meleagrinidæ, or Pearl Oysters, represented by Fig. 1, Plate VIII, which is the M. Margaritifera known to naturalists, the mollusk whose shells mainly contain pearls. Here are two long words; Meleagris is the Latin term for a Guinea or Turkey Hen, which naturalists may have thought the shells of this genus resembled due to their markings. There was, according to mythology, a famous hero from ancient times named Meleaga, but we can hardly believe there's any connection between his name and that of a genus of Oysters, of which the ancients were known to be quite fond. They reportedly not only enjoyed the mollusk itself but also the pearls found in its shell, which they would dissolve in wine at their lavish banquets to make the drinks richer, or at the very least, more luxurious; and this[49] leads us to the specific name of the Pearl Oyster, Margaritifera, derived from the Latin Margarita—meaning a pearl; the French use this word with a slight spelling change as Marguerite for both a daisy and

A PEARL.

This jewel, so highly valued for its chaste beauty, is but a secretion of animal matter, resulting from the efforts of some uneasy mollusk, annoyed by a foreign substance, which has found its way into his habitation, to make the best of an unavoidable evil by enclosing it in a soft smooth covering. Let us imitate the Oyster, and when annoyed or afflicted, by meekness and patience, and christian charity, strive to turn our vexations and troubles into “pearls of great price,” and “goodly pearls,” like those mentioned in scripture.

This gem, cherished for its pure beauty, is merely a secretion from an animal, created by a troubled mollusk, bothered by an unwanted irritant that has invaded its space, trying to cope with the situation by wrapping it in a soft, smooth layer. Let’s take a cue from the oyster and, when we’re troubled or suffering, respond with humility, patience, and kindness, aiming to transform our frustrations and difficulties into “pearls of great price” and “valuable pearls,” like those described in the scriptures.

It is on the north-west coast of the Island of Ceylon, in the Indian Ocean, that the Pearl Oyster most abounds, and there it is that the Pearl fishery is conducted in the most extensive, systematic, and successful manner; this fishing commences at the beginning of March, and upwards of two hundred boats are usually employed in it; in each of these boats are ten divers, who go down to the Oyster-beds, five at a time, and so relieve each other; there are besides thirteen other men who manage the boat, and attend to the divers. Altogether it is computed that from fifty to sixty thousand persons, in some way engaged in the fishery, or preparation, or sale of the pearls, assemble at and near the scene of operations, which must be indeed a busy one. The number of Oysters taken during the period of the fishing, which is about a month, must be prodigious. One boat has been known to bring on shore, in the day, as many as thirty-three thousand; they are placed in heaps, and allowed to remain until they become putrid, when they undergo a very elaborate process of washing and separating from the shells, which are carefully examined and deprived of their pearly treasures. The stench arising from the decomposed animal matter is described as horrible, and the whole process filthy and loathsome in the extreme; yet out of the slime and mud and disgusting effluvia, come every year gems of inestimable value, calculated to adorn the brow[50] of beauty, and form ornaments the most pure and delicate that can be imagined. For the exclusive right of fishing on the banks of Ceylon, for a single season, as much as £120,000 have been paid to the English government by one person, who sublets boats to others. Pearls vary greatly in value according to their colour and size; those which are perfectly white are the most valuable; next to these are those which have a yellowish tinge; the smallest kind, used for various ornamental purposes, are called seed pearls, the refuse is made into a kind of confection called chimum, highly relished by Chinese epicures. A single Oyster will sometimes contain several pearls, which are generally embedded in the body of the animal, but are sometimes fixed to the shell; it is recorded of one rich mollusk, that there were found in his possession no less than one hundred and fifty precious jewels; he must have been a miser, or perhaps he had taken them in pledge from his less provident neighbours.

It is on the northwest coast of the Island of Ceylon, in the Indian Ocean, that the Pearl Oyster is most abundant, and this is where the pearl fishing is carried out in the most extensive, organized, and successful way. The fishing starts at the beginning of March, and more than two hundred boats are typically involved. Each of these boats has ten divers who go down to the oyster beds, five at a time, to take turns. Additionally, there are thirteen other men who operate the boat and assist the divers. In total, it's estimated that around fifty to sixty thousand people, who are somehow involved in the fishing, preparation, or sale of pearls, gather at and near the fishing site, making it a very busy place. The number of oysters collected during the fishing season, which lasts about a month, must be enormous. One boat has been known to bring in as many as thirty-three thousand oysters in a single day; they are piled up and left until they start to rot, after which they go through a complex process of washing and separating from their shells, which are carefully inspected for their precious treasures. The smell from the decaying animal matter is described as horrible, and the entire process is extremely filthy and disgusting. Yet, out of the slime and mud and foul odors, come gems of unimaginable value each year, capable of adorning the most beautiful, and creating the purest and most delicate ornaments imaginable. For the exclusive right to fish the banks of Ceylon for one season, as much as £120,000 has been paid to the British government by a single person who then rents out boats to others. Pearls vary greatly in value depending on their color and size; those that are perfectly white are the most valuable, followed by those with a yellowish tint. The smaller ones, used for different decorative purposes, are called seed pearls, and the leftover material is turned into a type of candy called chimum, which is highly regarded by Chinese food lovers. Sometimes a single oyster can contain several pearls, which are usually found embedded in the animal's body, but can also be attached to the shell. It is reported that one particularly wealthy mollusk had no less than one hundred and fifty precious jewels; he must have been very greedy, or perhaps he had taken them as collateral from his less careful neighbors.

From the earliest time, pearls have been considered as valuable ornaments; they are mentioned in the book of Job, (see chap. xxviii, verse 18th.,) and are often alluded to by Greek and Roman writers. Various attempts have been made to imitate them, and one mode of producing them, practised, it is said, more than a thousand years ago, is still carried on in China. In the shells of Pearl Oysters, holes are bored, into which pieces of iron are introduced; these wounding and irritating the animal, cause it to deposit coat upon coat of pearly matter over the wounded part, and so the pearl is formed. Artificial pearls are made of hollow glass globules or little globes, covered on the inside with a liquid called pearl-essence, and filled up with white wax. Historians speak of an ancient traffic in native pearls carried on by this country; and in modern times, British pearls of considerable value have been discovered, one not many years since, by a gentleman who was eating oysters at Winchester, was valued at two hundred guineas. Generally, however, the pearls of this country are inferior in the two requisites of colour and size.

From ancient times, pearls have been seen as valuable adornments; they are mentioned in the book of Job (see chap. xxviii, verse 18), and Greek and Roman writers often refer to them. Various attempts have been made to imitate them, and one method of producing them, practiced over a thousand years ago, is still done in China. In the shells of pearl oysters, holes are drilled, and pieces of iron are inserted; these wound and irritate the animal, causing it to layer pearly substance over the wounded area, which results in the formation of a pearl. Artificial pearls are made from hollow glass beads or small globes, covered on the inside with a liquid called pearl essence and filled with white wax. Historians discuss an ancient trade in native pearls from this country, and in more recent times, valuable British pearls have been found; one, discovered not long ago by a gentleman eating oysters in Winchester, was valued at two hundred guineas. However, the pearls from this country are generally inferior in both color and size.

Interesting accounts of Pearls and Pearl-fishing, will be found in “the Penny,” and “Saturday Magazines,” and many other works easy of access. There our young readers may[51] learn of the perils and dangers to which the poor divers are exposed from the voracious sharks, which hover about the fishing grounds, and make a dash at their victim, heedless of the written charms, with which the priest or shark-charmer has provided him previous to his descent, and of much more than we can find space here to tell. All we can now do is to give the portrait, as drawn by Thomas Hood, of a lady who takes up her abode in all the pearl-producing bivalves, and who is therefore, perhaps on this account, called

Interesting stories about pearls and pearl fishing can be found in “The Penny,” “Saturday Magazines,” and many other easily accessible works. There, our young readers may[51] learn about the risks and dangers that the poor divers face from the hungry sharks that circle the fishing areas and make a sudden attack on their prey, ignoring the protective spells that the priest or shark-charmer has given them before their dive, along with much more than we can cover here. All we can do now is present the portrait, as described by Thomas Hood, of a lady who resides in all the pearl-producing bivalves and who is possibly called this for that reason.

THE MOTHER OF PEARL.

THE MUSSEL AND THE COCKLE.

It is in the Dimyaria division of the Conchifera that we must look for these familiar bivalves, the Mussel, or, as it is sometimes spelled, Muscle, and the Cockle; the former called in scientific language Mytilus, which in Latin means simply a shell-fish, and the latter Cardium, which may have reference to the hinge of this bivalve, or the heart-shape assumed by several of the species; cardo, in Latin, signifying the hinge of a gate, and cardesco, a stone in the shape of a heart.

It is in the Dimyaria division of the Conchifera where we find these familiar bivalves: the Mussel, sometimes spelled Muscle, and the Cockle. The Mussel is known scientifically as Mytilus, which simply means shellfish in Latin, while the Cockle is referred to as Cardium, possibly relating to the hinge of the bivalve or the heart shape of some species; cardo in Latin means the hinge of a gate, and cardesco refers to a stone shaped like a heart.

It is to the Mytilidæ family that we shall first direct our[52] attention, and here we find the Common or Edible Mussel, (M. edule,) and many other species, in all of which the shell is more or less elongated, or lengthened out, and pointed at one end. The members of this family are abundant on most rocky coasts, where facilities are afforded for the mollusks to moor themselves to rocks, stones, and other substances covered at high-water, but left dry by the retreating tide. They are not, however, confined to shores of this description, but are sometimes found in vast numbers on low sandy or pebbly flats, which run far out into the sea; these are called beds of Mussels, and are, like the Oyster grounds, specially cared for and protected. As a ship by its cable, so commonly the Mussel, by its bissus or beard, is made fast to its anchorage-ground, be it pebbly or sandy beach, or jutting rock. Sometimes, however, the mollusk travels, and this is how it manages to do so; it has a stout fleshy foot, in shape something like that of a chubby child, and this it can advance about two inches beyond the edge of the shell, then fixing the point of it to a piece of rock or any other body, and contracting it, the shell is drawn onward, and sure, though slow, progress is made in any desired direction. The Pinna, as the marine Mussel is called, has a foot which is cylindrical in shape, and has at the bottom a round tendon, almost as long as itself, the use of which appears to be to gather in and retain the numerous threads with which, when inhabiting the shores of tempestuous seas, it lashes itself fast to the fixed objects around; these threads are fastened at various points, and then drawn tight by the animal, whose instinct teaches it that its brittle shell would soon be broken in pieces, if suffered to roll hither and thither at the mercy of the waves.

We will first focus on the Mytilidæ family, where we find the Common or Edible Mussel, (M. edule), along with many other species. In all these, the shell is somewhat elongated or tapering at one end. Members of this family are plentiful along most rocky coasts, where they can attach themselves to rocks, stones, and other surfaces that are submerged at high tide but left dry when the tide goes out. However, they are not limited to these types of shores; they can also be found in large numbers on low sandy or pebbly flats that extend out into the sea. These areas are known as mussel beds and, like oyster grounds, are specially maintained and protected. Just as a ship is anchored by its cable, the mussel secures itself to its environment using its bissus or beard, whether it’s a pebbly or sandy beach, or a rocky outcrop. Occasionally, however, the mollusk moves around, and here’s how it does it: it has a sturdy fleshy foot shaped somewhat like a chubby child's foot, which it can extend about two inches beyond the shell. By attaching the tip to a rock or another object and then retracting it, the shell is pulled forward, allowing it to make slow but sure progress in any direction it chooses. The Pinna, as the marine mussel is called, has a cylindrical foot with a rounded tendon at the bottom that is nearly the same length as the foot itself. This tendon seems to help it gather and secure the numerous threads it uses to attach itself to stable objects when it lives along the shores of turbulent seas. These threads are anchored at various points and are tightened by the animal, which instinctively knows that its fragile shell would quickly shatter if allowed to be tossed around by the waves.

The Mussel has a very curious method of preparing its cable for this service; it is not woven, nor spun, nor drawn out of the body, like the web of the spider, but produced in a liquid form, and cast in a mould which is formed by a groove in the foot, extending from the root of the tendon to the upper extremity; the sides of this groove are formed so as to fold over it and form a canal, into which the glutinous or sticky secretion is poured; there it remains until it has dried into a solid thread, when the end of it is carried out by the foot, and applied to the object to which it is to be[53] attached; the canal is then opened through its whole length to free the thread, and closing again is ready for another casting; as if conscious how much depends upon the security of his lines, the animal tries every one after he has fixed it by swinging itself round so as to put the threads fully on the stretch; when once they are all firmly fixed, it seems to have no power of disengaging itself from them; the liquid matter out of which they are formed, is so very glutinous, or glue-like, as to attach itself firmly to the smoothest bodies. The process of producing it is a slow one, as it does not appear that the Pinna can form more than four or five in the course of twenty-four hours. When the animal is disturbed in its operations, it sometimes forms these threads too hastily; they are then more slender than those produced at leisure, and, of a consequence, weaker. On some parts of the Mediterranean coast, as in Sicily, gloves and other articles have been manufactured from the threads of this mollusk; they resemble very fine silk in appearance.

The mussel has a really interesting way of making its cable for this purpose; it isn’t woven, spun, or drawn out of its body like a spider's web. Instead, it’s produced in a liquid form and cast in a mold made by a groove in its foot, which runs from the base of the tendon to the top. The sides of this groove are shaped to fold over and create a canal where the sticky secretion is poured. It stays there until it dries into a solid thread, at which point the end is pushed out by the foot and attached to whatever it needs to stick to[53]. The canal then opens along its entire length to release the thread, and once closed again, it’s ready for another crafting. As if aware of how crucial the strength of its lines is, the mussel tests each one after fixing it by swinging itself around to fully stretch the threads. Once they are all securely attached, it seems unable to detach itself from them. The liquid material that makes them is so very sticky that it bonds tightly to even the smoothest surfaces. The process of producing these threads is slow since the Pinna can only create four or five in a day. When disturbed during this process, it sometimes makes the threads too quickly; these end up thinner than those made more carefully, and consequently, weaker. In certain areas along the Mediterranean coast, such as Sicily, gloves and other items have been made from the threads of this mollusk, which look very much like fine silk.

Cockle

The foot of the Cockle, of which we here give a figure, is commonly employed in scooping out the mud or sand, beneath which it conceals itself; this useful limb assumes the form of a shovel, hook, or any other instrument necessary for the purpose; it appears to be a mass of muscular fibres, and to possess great power. As a boatman in shallow water sends his vessel along by pushing against the bottom with his boat-hook, precisely so does Mr. Cardium travel; he doubles up his foot into a club, and by an energetic use of it as a propeller, makes considerable headway along the surface of the soft sand beneath the waters. In this way, too, some members of the genus solen force their way through the sand; while those called Tellina spring to a considerable distance, by first folding the foot into a small compass, and then suddenly expanding it, closing the shell at the same time with a loud snap; so that you see these sober-looking mollusks are sometimes frolicksome fellows; this is an enforcement of the lesson, judge not by appearances.

The foot of the Cockle, which we’ve illustrated here, is typically used to dig into the mud or sand, where it hides itself. This handy limb takes the shape of a shovel, hook, or any other tool needed for the job; it looks like a bunch of muscle fibers and has a lot of strength. Just like a boatman in shallow water pushes his boat forward with a boat-hook, Mr. Cardium moves by curling his foot into a club shape and using it energetically as a propeller to glide along the soft sand below the water. Similarly, some members of the genus solen push through the sand, while those known as Tellina can leap a good distance by first folding their foot into a compact shape and then suddenly expanding it, snapping their shells shut with a loud noise. So, you can see these seemingly serious mollusks can sometimes be quite playful—this teaches us not to judge by appearances.

Some of the species, both of the Mussel and Cockle families,[54] have very beautiful shells. We give a representation of one of each, on Plate VIII. Fig. 2 is the Magellanic Mytilus, (M. Magellanicus,) found chiefly in the Straits of Magellan; it is generally four or five inches long, the shells when polished are very brilliant, the deep purple colour changing into rich violet, as they are held in different lights. In most cabinets the large fan-like delicate shells of the genus Pinna may be observed; the largest species is that called Pinna flabellum, taken in the Mediterranean; it sometimes exceeds two feet in length. The first of these names is a Latin word signifying, besides a shell-fish, the fin of a fish, or the wing feathers of a bird—hence the term pinion; it refers to the fin-like or wing-like shape of this shell. Flabellum means a fan, referring probably to the bissus of the mollusk, which is fine and glossy, like silk, and very abundant.

Some species from the Mussel and Cockle families have really beautiful shells. We show one of each on Plate VIII. Fig. 2 is the Magellanic Mytilus, (M. Magellanicus), mainly found in the Straits of Magellan; it’s typically four or five inches long, and when polished, the shells are very shiny, transitioning from deep purple to rich violet as they catch the light in different ways. In many collections, you can see the large, delicate fan-like shells of the genus Pinna; the largest species is called Pinna flabellum, found in the Mediterranean, and it can sometimes exceed two feet in length. The first name is Latin for a shellfish, as well as the fin of a fish or the wing feathers of a bird—hence the term pinion; it refers to the fin-like or wing-like shape of this shell. Flabellum means a fan, probably referring to the bisso, or beard, of the mollusk, which is fine and glossy like silk and very abundant.

Many pretty specimens for figuring might be selected from the Naidæ, a family of Fresh-water Mussels, so called from the Naiades, fabulous divinities of the streams and rivers. The shells of many of these, which are of considerable thickness, are lined with the most brilliant nacre, and in these, as might be expected, pearls are sometimes found. One species, abundant in some English rivers, called the Mya Margaritifera, or, as some say, Uno elongates, has long been celebrated for this valuable production. It was most likely with pearls from this mollusk that Julius Cæsar adorned a breast-plate, which he dedicated to Venus, and hung up in her temple. The rivers Esk and Conway were formerly celebrated as British pearl-fishing grounds; a Conway pearl was presented by her chamberlain, Sir Richard Wynn, of Gwyder, to Catharine, Queen of Charles the Second; and in the royal crown of Britain this jewel is said still to occupy a place. Sir John Hawkins, the circumnavigator of the globe, held a patent for the pearl-fishery of the River Irt, in Cumberland. The rivers of Tyrone and Donegal, in Ireland, have, or had, their pearl-bearing Mussels; we read of one which weighed thirty-six carats, (a carat is nearly four grains,) but not being of perfect shape and colour, it was only valued at forty pounds. We also read of another purchased by Lady Glenlealy, for £10, and found to be so perfect and admirable, that £80 was afterwards offered for it, and refused.

Many attractive examples for study can be chosen from the Naidæ, a family of freshwater mussels named after the Naiades, mythical goddesses of streams and rivers. The shells of many of these mussels, which are quite thick, are lined with stunning nacre, and it’s not surprising that pearls are sometimes found in them. One species, common in some English rivers, known as Mya Margaritifera, or as some refer to it, Uno elongates, has long been famous for producing valuable pearls. Julius Caesar likely decorated a breastplate with pearls from this mollusk, which he dedicated to Venus and hung in her temple. The rivers Esk and Conway were once well-known as British pearl-fishing areas; a Conway pearl was given by her chamberlain, Sir Richard Wynn of Gwyder, to Catherine, Queen of Charles II, and it is said that this gem still holds a place in the British royal crown. Sir John Hawkins, who circumnavigated the globe, held a patent for the pearl fishery on the River Irt in Cumberland. The rivers of Tyrone and Donegal in Ireland have, or used to have, pearl-producing mussels; there is an account of one that weighed thirty-six carats (a carat is nearly four grains), but because it wasn’t perfectly shaped or colored, it was only valued at forty pounds. There’s also a story of another pearl bought by Lady Glenlealy for £10, which was so flawless and extraordinary that £80 was later offered for it, which she turned down.

[55]

[55]

These Naidæ have not a bissus like the Marine Mussels, they are therefore never attached to one object; they use their foot as a propeller in traversing the muddy floor of the pond or river, and they have a very funny way of getting along indeed; first, they open the valves of the shell, put out the foot, and after some little hard work, manage to set themselves up on edge; they then proceed by a series of jerks, leaving a deepish furrow in the mud behind them.

These Naidæ don’t have a byssus like Marine Mussels, so they’re never attached to anything. They use their foot to propel themselves across the muddy bottom of the pond or river, and they have quite a funny way of moving. First, they open the shell valves, extend their foot, and after some effort, manage to stand upright. Then they move in a series of jerks, leaving a noticeable trail in the mud behind them.

We will now go to Fig. 3, the Spined Cytherea, the Cytherea or Venus Dione of naturalists; the meaning of the term is the mother of Venus, who was, as you will remember, the goddess of beauty, given to this shell perhaps because it is entitled to occupy a place at the head of the Cytherea, a genus of the Cardiidæ, or Cockle family, of which genus there are about seventy-eight living species; this, as it is the most rare, is also, perhaps, the most beautiful; it is found in the seas of America, and is remarkable for the row of spines on the hinder border of each valve; these vary much in size and number, being in some individuals long and far apart, in others, short, thick, and closely set. The colour of the shell also varies considerably, being sometimes of a delicate rose colour; at others, more of a claret; at others again, bordering on purple. It was for one of the first discovered specimens of this shell, that £1000 is said to have been given. Truly a Venus of value this; it ought to be called the Queen of Cockles!

We will now look at Fig. 3, the Spined Cytherea, the Cytherea or Venus Dione as scientists call it; the name means the mother of Venus, who you’ll remember was the goddess of beauty. This shell probably got its name because it deserves to be at the top of the Cytherea genus, which is part of the Cardiidæ or Cockle family, with around seventy-eight living species. This one is not only the rarest but also possibly the most beautiful. It’s found in the waters of America and is notable for the row of spines along the back edge of each shell. The size and number of these spines vary a lot; in some individuals, they’re long and spaced out, while in others, they’re short, thick, and closely packed. The shell’s color also changes considerably, sometimes showing a delicate rose, at other times a deep claret, and sometimes edging towards purple. For one of the first discovered specimens of this shell, it’s said that £1000 was paid. Truly a precious Venus; it should be called the Queen of Cockles!

Our next example, (see Fig. 4,) is the Spotted Tridacna, (T. maculatus,) the latter term signifying spotted. In the Chamidæ or Clam family, is placed the Tridacna genus, the discovered species of which are not numerous; they are chiefly found in the Indian seas. The one above mentioned claims pre-eminence for beauty. We cannot quite see the applicability of the generic name; Tridacnus, in Latin, signifies to be eaten at three bites, but he must be a man of large capacity indeed who could so devour the head of this family, the Giant Tradacna, (T. gigas,) a single specimen of which has been known to weigh as much as five hundred and seventy pounds; from three to four hundred is by no means an uncommon size. The shell of this giant mollusk is of a very picturesque shape, something like its spotted congener, as we[56] call anything of the same kind or genus, only it is somewhat plainer, and more deeply ribbed and indented. The inside is of a glossy whiteness, and it is frequently used as a basin for garden fountains, or the reception of rills or little jets of water, which sparkle in its stainless hollow. In the church of St. Salpice, at Paris, is a shell of this immense Clam, the valves of which are used as receptacles for holy water; it was presented to Francis the First, by the republic of Venice. Fancy the clapping to of such a pair of valves, when the animal closes its shell in alarm, and the strength of the cable required to moor it to the rocks or coral reef. The spotted species here figured has a solid and heavy shell, very elegantly shaped, and beautifully marked, as will be seen; the greatly reduced size of the figure prevents anything like justice being done to the original.

Our next example, (see Fig. 4,) is the Spotted Tridacna, (T. maculatus,) which means spotted. The Chamidæ or Clam family includes the Tridacna genus, with not many discovered species, mostly found in the Indian seas. The one mentioned above stands out for its beauty. The generic name Tridacnus comes from Latin meaning to be eaten in three bites, but it would take a person with a huge appetite to consume the head of this family, the Giant Tridacna, (T. gigas), which can weigh as much as five hundred seventy pounds; sizes from three to four hundred pounds are quite common. The shell of this giant mollusk has a very striking shape, somewhat similar to its spotted relative, but it is a bit simpler and more deeply ribbed and indented. The inside is glossy white and is often used as a basin for garden fountains or to catch little streams of water that sparkle in its clean hollow. In the church of St. Sulpice in Paris, there's a shell from this massive clam, with the valves used as containers for holy water, which was a gift to Francis the First from the republic of Venice. Just imagine the sound of those valves clapping when the animal shuts its shell in fear, and the amount of strength needed to secure it to the rocks or coral reef. The spotted species shown here has a solid, heavy shell that is very elegantly shaped and beautifully marked, as you will see; the greatly reduced size of the figure doesn’t do justice to the original.

Heart Isocardea

The above is a figure of the Heart Isocardea, (I. cor,) which is also a member of the Clam family, and one of the most elegantly-shaped shells in the whole range of Conchology. It is a native of the Mediterranean and other seas of Europe, and has been taken in deep water on the West coast of Ireland. We complete this group with a representation of the curious Arcadæ family, or Ark shells, as they are commonly called, because one of the species was thought to resemble the ark built by Noah. Mr. Swainson tells us that the animals of these shells affix themselves to other bodies by a[57] particular muscle, which is protruded through the gaping part of the valves; they also adhere, when young, by means of the bissiform epidermis, or bissus-like outer skin: this species is a native of the Atlantic Ocean and the seas of Europe. The Antique Ark, (A. antiqua,) is very like the Common Cockle, being of a white colour, and heart-shaped. We give below a representation of this shell, and also of the shell of the pretty little Pearly Trigonia, (T. margaritacea,) included in the Arcadæ family; this is a rare species, found only in the seas of New Holland.

The figure above shows the Heart Isocardea, (I. cor), which is also part of the Clam family and has one of the most elegantly shaped shells in the entire field of Conchology. It is found in the Mediterranean and other European seas and has been collected from deep waters off the West coast of Ireland. We complete this group with a depiction of the interesting Arcadæ family, or Ark shells, as they are commonly known, because one of the species was thought to look like the ark built by Noah. Mr. Swainson mentions that the creatures of these shells attach themselves to other objects using a[57] specific muscle that they extend through the open part of the valves; they also stick to surfaces when young through a bissiform epidermis, or bissus-like outer skin. This species is native to the Atlantic Ocean and European seas. The Antique Ark, (A. antiqua), closely resembles the Common Cockle, being white and heart-shaped. Below, we provide a depiction of this shell, as well as the shell of the charming little Pearly Trigonia, (T. margaritacea), which is part of the Arcadæ family; this species is rare and found only in the waters of New Holland.

A. antiqua, the Antique Ark
T. margaritacea, the Pearly Trigonia

SCALLOP SHELLS.

Several species of Scallop Shells are found scattered about on our shores; they belong, as before stated, to the family Pectinidæ, the meaning of which term has been already explained. These shells were called by Cuvier “the Butterflies of the Ocean,” on account of the various and beautiful colours which they exhibit. Some of them are exceedingly thin, and brittle as glass; one species found in the Arctic regions, is as transparent as that substance, and is therefore called P. vitreus, from the Latin for glass, which is vitreum. One of the commonest of our native Scallops is the St. James’ Cockle, (P. Jacobœus;) this shell is found in great plenty along our southern coasts; it is often referred to by old writers, on account of having been commonly worn in the hats of pilgrims to Palestine, or the Holy Land, as the scene of our Saviour’s life and death was called. Sir Walter Raleigh,[58] in his poem called “The Pilgrimage,” thus enumerates the different articles considered necessary for a Palmer, as these pilgrims were termed:—

Several types of scallop shells are found scattered along our shores; they belong, as previously mentioned, to the family Pectinidæ, which we have already explained. Cuvier referred to these shells as “the Butterflies of the Ocean” due to their various and beautiful colors. Some of them are extremely thin and as brittle as glass; one species found in the Arctic regions is as transparent as glass and is therefore called P. vitreus, from the Latin word for glass, which is vitreum. One of the most common native scallops is the St. James’ Cockle, (P. Jacobœus); this shell is abundant along our southern coasts. It is often mentioned by old writers because it was commonly worn in the hats of pilgrims to Palestine, or the Holy Land, which is where our Savior’s life and death took place. Sir Walter Raleigh, [58] in his poem called “The Pilgrimage,” lists the different items considered necessary for a Palmer, as these pilgrims were called:—

“Give me my scallop shell of quiet,
My staff of faith to lean upon,
My scrip of joy, (immortal diet,)
My bottle of salvation,
My gown of glory, hope’s true gage,
And thus I’ll make my pilgrimage.”

This Mollusk, it may be noticed, like many other bivalves, has a flat, and a concave or hollow shell: in early times when plates and drinking vessels were not so plentiful as they are now, one of these served the former purpose, and the other the latter; thus, in speaking of a feast, a Gaelic or Scottish bard has said—

This mollusk, as you might notice, like many other bivalves, has a flat and a concave or hollow shell. In earlier times, when plates and drinking vessels weren’t as common as they are today, one of these served as a plate and the other as a bowl; therefore, when talking about a feast, a Gaelic or Scottish bard has said—

“The joy of the shell went round.”

Sometimes the species termed Pecten opercularis, was used as the pilgrim’s badge; the specific name comes most likely from the Latin operculum, whose meaning has been explained.

Sometimes the species called Pecten opercularis was used as the pilgrim’s badge; the specific name probably comes from the Latin operculum, which has been explained.

COMMON SCALLOP.

This too, is a common British shell, as is also the little[59] speckled Scallop, (P. varia,) which may be found on almost any part of the coast where the water-line is margined with a sandy ridge. The shells are generally about two inches long, of various colours, clouded, speckled, and marked with about twelve ribs. There is a foreign species called the Flounder Scallop, P. pleuronectes, which is remarkable for having the two valves of the shell of different colours, the upper one being of a rich reddish brown, and the lower one white: the specific name has reference to this, being compounded of the Latin pleura—something double, and necto—to join. The fish called the Flounder, is brown above and white beneath, hence the English name of this shell. The preceding engraving of the Common Scallop, viewed from the front, shows the flat and concave form of the two valves of this shell, and also the depth of the indentations or ridges.

This is also a common British shell, just like the little [59] speckled Scallop, (P. varia), which can be found along almost any part of the coast where the shoreline has a sandy ridge. The shells are usually about two inches long and come in various colors, featuring clouds, speckles, and around twelve ribs. There's a foreign species called the Flounder Scallop, P. pleuronectes, notable for its two shell valves being different colors, with the upper one a rich reddish-brown and the lower one white. The species name references this, made up of the Latin pleura—meaning double, and necto—to join. The fish called the Flounder is brown on top and white underneath, which is why this shell has the English name. The preceding engraving of the Common Scallop, viewed from the front, illustrates the flat and concave shape of the two shell valves and the depth of the indentations or ribs.

LIMPITS.

Among the rocks of the British coast, there are no shells more frequently met with than those of the Common Limpit, Patella vulgata; they lie scattered about like so many little empty cups, each having, on the death of the mollusk, fallen from the rocky cavity in which it was embedded, and which was just large enough to contain it. Here the animal attaches itself so firmly by its fibrous foot, which is hollow in the centre, and acts like a sucker, that it is almost impossible to loosen its hold otherwise than by inserting something thin, like the blade of a knife between it and the stone. By this power of adhesion, the Limpit is protected from the violence of the waves, and also from its numerous enemies, aquatic birds and animals, which have a relish for its flesh. Still vast numbers are used as food, both by man and the inferior creatures, so that the means of defence furnished to the Limpits of the rock, are not always sure. “The peasantry of the western isles of Scotland,” we are told by Miss Pratt, “look to the Periwinkles and Limpits, which abound on the rocks, for their daily meal, often for long seasons, subsisting[60] almost entirely upon this humble food. In the Isle of Skye, the inhabitants are often, at one time of the year, without any other source of provision.” Then comes the Sea-gull, and the Duck, and the Pied Oyster-catcher, to feed on the poor little mollusk, the bill of the latter bird being admirably adapted for loosening its hold on the rock.

Among the rocks of the British coast, you won't find shells more commonly seen than those of the Common Limpet, Patella vulgata; they are scattered around like tiny empty cups, each one having fallen from the rocky cavity where it was nestled after the mollusk died, which was just big enough to hold it. Here, the animal attaches itself so strongly with its fibrous foot, which is hollow in the center and acts like a sucker, that it’s almost impossible to break its grip without sliding something thin, like a knife blade, between it and the stone. This sticking power protects the Limpet from the force of the waves and also from its many enemies, like aquatic birds and animals that enjoy its flesh. Still, countless Limpets are eaten by both humans and lower creatures, so the defenses that the Limpets have on the rocks aren't always effective. “The peasantry of the western isles of Scotland,” Miss Pratt tells us, “rely on the Periwinkles and Limpets, which are plentiful on the rocks, for their daily meals, often depending on this simple food for long periods. In the Isle of Skye, the people often have no other source of food during certain times of the year.” Then come the Sea-gull, the Duck, and the Pied Oyster-catcher, feeding on the poor little mollusk, with the bill of the latter bird perfectly designed for loosening its grip on the rock.

Patella in Latin signifies a salad-dish, a knee-pan, and several other domestic utensils, of a broad shallow make, and hence we find the plural form of the word applied to the Limpit family, whose shells are of such a shape. Members of this family are found on all rocky coasts, except those of the Arctic seas; on Tropical rocks they grow to a large size, and form a valuable article of food. A very curious piece of mechanism is the tongue of the Common Limpit, it is from two to three inches long, and has a spoon-like extremity, so that it looks, when extended from the mouth, like a small snake; if examined through a microscope, it is seen to be armed throughout its whole extent with rows, four deep, of sharp hooked teeth, and between each row are placed two others, which have three points, and are set in a slanting position; the use of this arrangement we cannot at present determine, but no doubt it has a perfect adaptation to the wants of the animal.

Patella in Latin means a salad dish, a knee pan, and several other kitchen utensils that are broad and shallow. That's why the plural form of the word is used for the Limpit family, whose shells have a similar shape. Members of this family can be found on all rocky coastlines, except those in the Arctic seas. On tropical rocks, they grow quite large and are a valuable food source. The tongue of the Common Limpit is a fascinating piece of machinery; it measures about two to three inches long and has a spoon-like end, making it look like a small snake when extended from its mouth. When viewed under a microscope, it reveals rows of sharp hooked teeth, four deep, throughout its entire length, with two additional rows of three pointed teeth set at an angle between each row. We can't determine the exact purpose of this arrangement right now, but it surely fits the needs of the animal perfectly.

There are shell-fish called Key-hole Limpits, which belong to the genus Fissurellidæ, from fissura—a cleft or slip, from whence comes also fissure. All the members of this genus are distinguished by the aperture at the top of the shell, shaped like a key-hole, which is situated exactly over the breathing organs, and serves as a channel for the water necessary for respiration.

There are shellfish known as Key-hole Limpets, which belong to the genus Fissurellidæ, derived from fissura—meaning a cleft or gap, which is also where the term fissure comes from. All members of this genus are characterized by the opening at the top of the shell, shaped like a keyhole, positioned directly over the breathing organs, and it serves as a channel for the water needed for respiration.

Frequently upon the fronds of the large olive sea-weeds may be found a tiny shell shaped something like that of the Common Limpit; it is of an olive green colour, with blue streaks, and is called, from its clearness, the Pellucid Limpit, P. pellucida. There is also another much like it in appearance, which naturalists call P. lœvis. To the labours of these little mollusks, according to Dr. Harvey, may be partly attributed the destruction of the gigantic Algæ, (sea-weed.) Eating into the lower part of the stems, and destroying the branches of the roots, they so far weaken the base, that it becomes unable[61] to support the weight of the frond; and thus the plant is detached and driven on shore by the waves.

Frequently on the fronds of the large olive seaweeds, you can find a tiny shell that resembles the shell of the Common Limpit. It has an olive green color with blue streaks and is called the Pellucid Limpit, P. pellucida, due to its transparency. There's also another shell that looks similar, which naturalists refer to as P. lœvis. According to Dr. Harvey, the work of these little mollusks partly contributes to the destruction of the gigantic alga (seaweed). By burrowing into the lower part of the stems and damaging the branches of the roots, they weaken the base to the point where it can no longer support the weight of the frond; as a result, the plant gets detached and is washed ashore by the waves.

“And so the forest tall that groweth,
Underneath the waters clear,
Does the little woodman mollusk,
Level every year;
From small causes, great results—
Teaching you to persevere.”

ROCK-BORERS.

The family Pholadæ comprises a group of mollusks, the boring habits of which have long been known; they penetrate wood, hard clay, chalk, and rocks, and devastate the labours of man; they attack the hulls of ships, the piles which form the foundations of piers and break-waters, and they force themselves upon our attention by the loss of property, as well as of life, which results from their hidden depredations. Of this family, those belonging to the genus Pholus may be more especially likened to the Edomites of Scripture, because they take up their abode in the rock, and hollow out for themselves dwellings therein. With a shell as thin as paper, and brittle as glass, the wonder is how these Rock-borers work their way into and through hard stones. Some naturalists assert that they effect this by means of an acid which decomposes the substance of the rock, and renders it soft; others, that the animal keeps turning round and round like an instrument called an auger, and so gradually rasps away the surface of the stone with the angles of its shell, but we question whether the shell would not be worn out first in such a process. The generic name of these “stone-piercers,” comes from the Greek word Pholeo—to hide, and the rocky chambers which they hollow out for themselves, are as snug hiding-places as can well be imagined; yet, however deep they may go into these gloomy caverns, as we should be apt to suppose them, they need not be in darkness, for it appears that these Pholades emit a most remarkable light, whether phosphorescent or not does not appear to be determined; so strong is it, that it is[62] said to illuminate the mouth of the person who eats the mollusk; and it is remarked by Dr. Priestly, that “contrary to the nature of most fish, which give light when they tend to putrescence, this is more luminous the fresher it is, and when dried its light will revive on being moistened with water.” So that in more respects than one these rock-borers are mysteries. The most common of them, perhaps, is the Prickly Pidduck, or Peckstone, (P. dactylus,) which is much used by the fishermen of our coasts as bait; the specific name is the Latin for a fruit shaped like a finger, which is something like the shape of this mollusk, as will be seen by the annexed engraving.

The family Pholadæ includes a group of mollusks known for their boring habits; they tunnel into wood, hard clay, chalk, and rocks, destroying human efforts in the process. They attack ship hulls, the pilings that make up the foundations of piers and breakwaters, and they draw our attention through the loss of property and life caused by their unseen damage. Among this family, the genus Pholus can be compared to the Edomites of Scripture, as they make their homes in the rock and carve out living spaces for themselves. With shells as thin as paper and as brittle as glass, it’s surprising how these Rock-borers manage to burrow into and through hard stone. Some naturalists believe they do this by using an acid that breaks down the rock's material, making it softer; others contend that the animal rotates like a tool called an auger, gradually scraping away at the stone's surface with the edges of its shell, but we wonder if the shell wouldn’t wear out first in such a process. The generic name for these “stone-piercers” comes from the Greek word Pholeo—to hide—and the rocky chambers they excavate for themselves are as cozy as can be imagined; however deep they may dig into these dark caverns, they don’t have to remain in darkness since it appears that these Pholades emit a remarkable light, though it’s not clear if it’s phosphorescent. The light is so strong that it is said to illuminate the mouth of anyone who eats the mollusk, and Dr. Priestly notes that “unlike most fish, which glow as they decay, this one is brighter the fresher it is, and when dried, its light returns when moistened with water.” So, in more ways than one, these rock-borers are full of mysteries. The most common among them is probably the Prickly Pidduck or Peckstone (P. dactylus), which is often used by fishermen along our coasts as bait; the specific name is Latin for a fruit shaped like a finger, similar to the shape of this mollusk, as shown in the accompanying engraving.

Pholas dactylus in a split section of rock

The genus Pholus is very widely distributed, and all the species have the same boring habits as those of our own coast, which we need not enumerate. Like them too in this respect are the marine worms called Teredo, which make their way into the bottoms of ships, and all submerged timber, but these will be more fully spoken of in another volume. The above figure exhibits the Pholas dactylus as it appears in a section of rock, split open for the purpose of seeing the shelly miner at his work.

The genus Pholus is found in many places, and all the species have the same uninteresting habits as those along our own coastline, which we don’t need to list. Similarly, the marine worms known as Teredo also burrow into the bottoms of ships and any submerged wood, but we’ll discuss them in more detail in another volume. The figure above shows Pholas dactylus as it looks when cut into a rock, allowing us to see the shelly miner at work.


[63]

[63]

MULTIVALVES.

We have insensibly passed from the Bivalve shells to those composed of several pieces, and therefore called Multivalves; properly, perhaps, the Rock-borers, last described, come into this division, for although their covering consists mainly of two principal portions or valves, yet there are often additional parts; in some a calcarious tube envelopes the whole mollusk, leaving only an opening behind; this is more especially the case with those which most resemble worms, such as the genera Teredina and Teredo, included by Lamarck in the family which he calls Tubulidæ.

We have gradually moved from Bivalve shells to those made up of multiple pieces, known as Multivalves. Technically, the Rock-borers, which were described last, fit into this category because, although their covering mainly consists of two main parts or valves, there are often extra pieces. In some cases, a calcareous tube surrounds the entire mollusk, leaving only an opening. This is especially true for those that closely resemble worms, such as the genera Teredina and Teredo, which Lamarck classified in the family he calls Tubulidæ.

The first group of multivalves we shall have to notice, are

The first group of multivalves we need to recognize are

THE CHITONS,

forming the family Chitonidæ. The term has a Greek derivation, and means a coat of mail. These mollusks are covered by a shell formed of eight distinct portions, arranged along the back in a single row, and attached to a mantle which resembles leather, being very tough and wrinkled; the edges of this mantle extend beyond the borders of the plates, which overlap each other, so as to constitute a kind of armour, very different from the conical shell of the Limpit, or the turbinated, that is twisted, case of some of the Borers. The coverings of the Chitons are variously marked, so that each distinct species is known by its peculiar pattern, as a knight of old by the quarterings of his shield. All the mantles, however, have scaly, hairy, or spiny margins. In this coat of mail, the animal can roll itself up like an armadillo, and so be tolerably secure from its enemies; it has an oval foot, the sides of which are covered with small leaflets, and by means of this it can attach itself to rocks, like the Limpit, or travel about in search of adventures. It has no distinct head, therefore it is acephalous; nor any perceptible eyes. The mouth is furnished with a long tongue, curled up spirally, like a watch-spring, and armed with horny teeth.

forming the family Chitonidæ. The term comes from Greek and means a coat of mail. These mollusks are covered by a shell made up of eight distinct plates, arranged in a single row along their back, and attached to a mantle that looks like tough, wrinkled leather; the edges of this mantle extend beyond the borders of the plates, overlapping to create a sort of armor, which is very different from the conical shell of the Limpet or the spiral-shaped shell of some Borers. The coverings of Chitons have various markings, allowing each species to be identified by its unique pattern, like a knight of old by the quarterings on his shield. All the mantles, however, have scaly, hairy, or spiny edges. In this coat of mail, the animal can roll itself up like an armadillo, making it fairly safe from predators; it has an oval foot, with small leaflets on the sides, which allows it to cling to rocks like a Limpet or move around in search of adventures. It doesn’t have a distinct head, so it is acephalous, nor does it have visible eyes. Its mouth features a long tongue that coils up like a watch spring and is equipped with hard teeth.

The members of the Chiton family are numerous, being[64] found on most rocky shores; they attain the largest size in the hottest climates, having never been found very far north. The British species are small, and not more than two or three in number; they may be found adhering to stones near low-water mark. We give a figure of one of these called the Tufted Chiton, (C. fascicularis;) this word is from the Latin fasciculus—a little bundle of leaves or flowers, and it refers to the hairy tufts that edge the mantle of this marine slug.

The Chiton family has many members, which are[64] commonly found on most rocky shores. They grow largest in warmer climates and are rarely found far north. The British species are small, with only two or three known, and can be seen clinging to rocks near low tide. We provide an illustration of one called the Tufted Chiton, (C. fascicularis); this name comes from the Latin word fasciculus—meaning a small bundle of leaves or flowers, which refers to the hairy tufts that line the mantle of this marine slug.

C. fascicularis, the Tufted Chiton

BARNACLES,

Or, as they are sometimes called, Bernicles, belong to what naturalists term the class Cirrhopoda, sometimes spelled cirripeda, which appears to be derived from the Latin cirrus—a tuft or lock of hair curled, and pede—a foot; hence the term may be translated hairy-footed. Such of our readers as have seen the Common or Duck Barnacle, (Pentalasmis anatifera,) will at once understand the applicability of this term. Many a piece of drift wood comes to land literally covered with long fleshy stalks, generally of a purplish red colour, twisting and curling in all directions, and terminating in delicate porcelain-like shells, clear and brittle, of a white colour, just tinged with blue, from between which project the many-jointed cirrhi, or hair-like tentacles, which serve the purpose of a casting net, to seize and drag to the mouth of the animal, its prey, which consists of small mollusks and crustacea.

Or, as they are sometimes called, barnacles, belong to what naturalists refer to as the class Cirrhopoda, sometimes spelled cirripeda, which seems to come from the Latin cirrus—a tuft or lock of hair curled, and pede—a foot; thus, the term can be translated to hairy-footed. Those of our readers who have seen the Common or Duck Barnacle, (Pentalasmis anatifera), will immediately understand why this term applies. Many pieces of driftwood wash up on shore completely covered with long, fleshy stalks, usually a purplish-red color, twisting and curling in all directions, and ending in delicate, porcelain-like shells that are clear and brittle, white with a hint of blue, from which extend the many-jointed cirrhi, or hair-like tentacles, that act like a casting net to catch and drag small mollusks and crustaceans to the animal's mouth.

This is the Barnacle about which such strange stories are told by old writers, who affirmed that the Barnacle or Brent Goose, that in winter visits our shores, is produced from these fleshy foot-stalks and hairy shells by a natural process of growth, or, as some philosophers of our day would say, of development. Gerard, who, in 1597, wrote a “Historie of Plants,” describes the process by which the fish is transformed into the bird; telling his readers that as “the shells gape, the legs hang out, that the bird growing bigger and bigger[65] the shells open more and more, till at length it is attached only by the bill, soon after which it drops into the sea; there it acquires feathers, and grows to a fowle.” There is an amusing illustration given in Gerard’s book, where the young Geese are represented hanging on the branches of trees, just ready to drop into the water, where a number of those that have previously fallen, like ripe fruit, and attained their full plumage, are sailing about very contentedly. It was part of this theory that the Barnacles were of vegetable origin, they grew upon trees, or sprung out of the ground like mushrooms; so we find in the works of an old poet named Du Bartas, these lines:—

This is the Barnacle that old writers tell such strange stories about, claiming that the Barnacle or Brent Goose, which visits our shores in winter, comes from these fleshy foot-stalks and hairy shells through a natural growth process, or, as some modern philosophers would say, development. Gerard, who wrote a “History of Plants” in 1597, describes how the fish turns into the bird, explaining to his readers that as “the shells open, the legs hang out, and the bird grows bigger and bigger[65] the shells open wider and wider until it is only attached by the bill, shortly after which it falls into the sea; there it grows feathers and becomes a bird.” Gerard's book includes a humorous illustration showing young Geese hanging from tree branches, ready to drop into the water, where several that have already fallen, like ripe fruit, and gained their full plumage, are happily swimming around. Part of this theory claimed that Barnacles were of plant origin, growing on trees or sprouting from the ground like mushrooms; this idea is echoed in the works of an old poet named Du Bartas, who wrote these lines:—

“So slow Bootes underneath him sees
In the icy islands goslings hatched of trees,
Whose fruitful leaves, falling into the water,
Are turned, as known, to living fowls soon after;
So rotten planks of broken ships do change
To Barnacles. O transformation strange!
’Twas first a green tree, then a broken hull,
Lately a mushroom, now a flying Gull.”

The investigations of modern science have quite exploded this foolish notion; we now know exactly what transformations the Barnacle undergoes; strange enough some of them are, but it does not change into a Goose, although its specific name has reference to that bird, being derived from anas, the Latin for Goose.

The research of modern science has completely shattered this silly idea; we now know exactly what changes the Barnacle goes through; some of them are quite strange, but it doesn’t turn into a Goose, even though its scientific name refers to that bird, coming from anas, the Latin word for Goose.

The shell of the Barnacle is composed of five pieces joined together by membranes; four pieces are lateral, that is to say, they form the sides, the word comes from the Latin latus—a side; the other is a single narrow slip, which fills what would otherwise be an open space down the back between the valves; these parts of the shell appear to be somewhat loosely connected, so as to allow free action to the animal lodged within, which is enclosed in a fine skin or mantle. The mouth is placed at the lower part, near the opening, whence the cirrhi issue forth; this mouth is a curious piece of mechanism, being furnished with a horny lip covered with minute palpi, or feelers; there are three pairs of mandibles, that is jaws, the two outer ones being horny and serrated, that is jagged or toothed like a saw; the inner one is soft and membranous,[66] that is, composed of little fibres, like strings, crossing each other, as we see what are called the veins in a leaf.

The shell of the barnacle consists of five pieces connected by membranes; four pieces are on the sides, which comes from the Latin word latus meaning side; the other is a single narrow strip that fills what would otherwise be an open space along the back between the valves. These parts of the shell seem to be somewhat loosely connected, allowing the animal inside to move freely, as it is enclosed in a fine skin or mantle. The mouth is located at the bottom, near the opening, where the cirri come out; this mouth is a fascinating mechanism with a hard lip covered in tiny palpi, or feelers. There are three pairs of mandibles, or jaws, with the two outer ones being hard and serrated, like a saw, while the inner one is soft and membranous, made of little fibers that crisscross each other, similar to the veins in a leaf.[66]

Much more might be said about the internal structure of the Cirrhopods, or Balani, as the Barnacle group is sometimes called, from the Latin Balanus—a kind of acorn. By some naturalists, the term is not applied to the stalked Cirrhipoda, like that we have been describing, but only to the sessile kinds, that is, those which set close or grow low; from the same Latin root comes the English word session—a settling. The coverings of these Dwarf Barnacles are sometimes called acorn shells; they are commonly white, of an irregular cone shape, composed of several ribbed pieces, closely fitted together with an opening at the top, closed by an operculum, or stopper.

Much more could be said about the internal structure of the Cirrhopods, or Balani, which is another name for the Barnacle group, derived from the Latin Balanus—a type of acorn. Some naturalists only use the term for the non-stalked Cirrhipoda, like the ones we've been describing, focusing solely on the sessile types, meaning those that attach close to or grow low to the surface; the same Latin root gives us the English word session—indicating a settling. The coverings of these Dwarf Barnacles are sometimes referred to as acorn shells; they are usually white, shaped like irregular cones, made up of several ribbed pieces that fit closely together with an opening at the top, sealed by an operculum, or stopper.

These shells cover in patches the surface of exposed rocks, drift wood, and any other substance. Some of the mollusks affix themselves to the bodies of Whales, others form a lodgment in the hollows of corals and sponges. Once fixed they remain so during life, taking their chance of such suitable food as may come within their limited sphere of action. At an earlier stage of their existence, both their shape and habits are very different, being lively little creatures, swimming about hither and thither like water-fleas. They are about the tenth of an inch long, and of most grotesque appearance, having six jointed legs set with hairs, the whole being so arranged that they act in concert, and striking or flapping the water, send the little body along in a series of bounds; then the creature has two long arms, each furnished with hooks and a sucker, and a tail tipped with bristles, which is usually folded up under the body; its pair of large staring eyes are pedunculated, that is, set upon foot-stalks; it has a house on its back, like a bivalve shell, into which it can collect its scattered members when occasion requires. When of sufficient age to settle itself in life, and become a staid member of submarine society, it fixes itself to some convenient object, throws away its eyes as no longer useful, gets rid of its preposterous limbs, enlarges its house, and sits down to fishing in a small way for an honest and respectable livelihood.

These shells cover patches of exposed rocks, driftwood, and other surfaces. Some of the mollusks attach themselves to whales, while others settle in the hollows of corals and sponges. Once they’re fixed, they stay that way for life, relying on whatever suitable food comes within their limited reach. At an earlier stage, their shape and habits are very different; they are active little creatures, swimming around like water fleas. They are about a tenth of an inch long and have a very unusual appearance, with six jointed legs covered in hairs, all coordinated to strike or flap the water, propelling them forward in a series of jumps. The creature has two long arms, each with hooks and suckers, and a tail tipped with bristles, which is usually folded under its body. It has a pair of large, prominent eyes on stalks and carries a shell on its back, like a bivalve, that it can retract into when needed. When it reaches a certain age and is ready to settle down in life, it attaches itself to a convenient object, discards its eyes since they are no longer useful, sheds its awkward limbs, enlarges its shell, and begins fishing in a small way for a simple and respectable living.

A piece of timber covered with Stalked Barnacles, wriggling and twisting about like so many helmeted snakes, and waving their plume-like cirrhi, is a very curious sight. They sometimes[67] attach themselves to ship’s bottoms in such numbers as to retard their progress through the water; they do not, however, bore into and destroy the timber, like the Teredines, or ship worms, to which we have alluded in our brief notice of the Pholadæ. The growth of Barnacles must be very rapid, as a ship perfectly free from them, will often return after a short voyage, with her bottom below the water line completely covered.

A piece of wood covered with Stalked Barnacles, wriggling and twisting like a bunch of helmeted snakes, while waving their plume-like cirrhi, is a really fascinating sight. They sometimes[67] attach themselves to the bottoms of ships in such large numbers that they slow down their movement through the water; however, they don’t bore into and destroy the wood like the Teredines, or shipworms, which we mentioned in our brief overview of the Pholadæ. The growth of Barnacles must be very fast, as a ship that is completely free of them can often return after a short voyage with its bottom below the waterline completely covered.

We give a representation of a group of these stalked mollusks, as they appear affixed to a piece of timber. This is the Common, or Duck Barnacle.

We show a picture of a group of these stalked mollusks as they look when attached to a piece of wood. This is the Common, or Duck Barnacle.

Common, or Duck Barnacle

CUTTLE FISH.

Strange and monstrous as are the forms of many of the creatures that inhabit the deep, there are perhaps none more so than those belonging to that division of the class Cephalopoda,[68] called Sepia or Cuttle-fish. But before we go any further let us enquire what is meant by a Cephalopod. Our readers have already learned that Gasteropod means stomach and foot, and that acephalous means headless; now here we have a word which takes a portion of each of the others, cephal—head, and peda, or poda—a foot, consequently ceph-a-lo-po-da, is a class of molluscous animals which have their feet, or organs of motion, arranged around the head, something, you may suppose, like that celebrated hero of nursery rhymes,

Strange and bizarre as many of the creatures that live in the deep are, perhaps none are more so than those in the class Cephalopoda,[68] known as Sepia or cuttlefish. But before we dive deeper, let's clarify what a Cephalopod is. Our readers already know that Gasteropod means stomach and foot, and that acephalous means headless; now we have a word that combines parts of both, cephal—head, and peda or poda—foot. Therefore, ceph-a-lo-po-da refers to a class of mollusks that have their feet, or means of movement, arranged around their heads, much like that famous nursery rhyme hero.

“Tom Toddy, all head and no body.”

Only our bag-shaped Mr. Sepia, with his great round staring eyes, and numerous legs or arms, whichever you please to call them, all twisting and twining about like so many serpents, is a much more formidable looking individual. A strange fellow is this altogether; he has a shell, but he does not use it for a covering, he carries it inside of him, and it serves the purpose of a sort of back-bone; it is horny and calcarious, light and porous, as our readers well know, having most likely often used it to take out unsightly blots, or erase mistakes in their copy or cyphering books.

Only our bag-shaped Mr. Sepia, with his big round staring eyes and multiple legs or arms—whichever you prefer to call them—twisting and curling around like a bunch of serpents, is a much more intimidating-looking character. This guy is really something; he has a shell, but he doesn’t use it as a covering. Instead, he carries it inside him, and it acts like a sort of backbone. It’s hard and calcium-rich, light and porous, as you all know, since you’ve probably often used it to remove unsightly stains or fix mistakes in your notes or math books.

When Mr. Sepia walks abroad, he sticks his little round body upright, so that his eyes, and mouth, which is armed with a parrot-like beak, are brought close to the surface over which he passes, while his long twining legs go sprawling about in all directions; on the insides of these legs are a great number of small circular suckers, by means of which the animal can fix itself to any object so tightly that it is almost impossible to detach it without tearing off part of the limb. Woe be to the poor unfortunate fish that chances to come in its way; the snaky arms are thrown around it, and made fast, and away goes the cephalopod for a ride, eating on the road to lose no time, on the finny steed that carries it. In some species each of the suckers has a hook in the centre, which of course renders the hold yet firmer, and no doubt adds to the disagreeable sensation which their tight compression must cause; it is likely that these hooks are intended to retain the hold of soft and slippery prey, which might otherwise be too agile for the “ugly customer,” that would[69] affectionately embrace it. But Mr. Sepia, though well armed in front, is rather open to attacks in the rear of his soft naked body; to provide for such an emergency, he is furnished with a little bag of inky fluid, which he squirts out in the face of his pursuer, and escapes under cover of the cloud; this is the substance used by painters, and called sepia, whence the generic name of the mollusks which produce it.

When Mr. Sepia is out and about, he holds his small round body upright, so that his eyes and his parrot-like beak are close to the surface he’s moving over, while his long, twisting legs stretch out in all directions. Along the insides of these legs are many small circular suckers that allow the creature to attach itself to any object so securely that it’s almost impossible to detach it without tearing off part of the limb. Woe to the poor fish that happens to cross its path; the snake-like arms wrap around it and hold it tight, and off goes the cephalopod for a ride, eating on the way to not waste any time on the fish that carries it. In some species, each sucker has a hook in the center, making the grip even stronger, and no doubt adding to the unpleasant sensation caused by their tight hold; these hooks likely help keep a grip on soft and slippery prey that might otherwise escape from the "ugly customer" that would lovingly embrace it. But Mr. Sepia, despite being well-equipped in front, is somewhat vulnerable from behind due to his soft, unprotected body; to handle such a situation, he has a little bag of inky fluid that he squirts in the face of his attacker to escape under the cover of the cloud. This substance is used by painters and is called sepia, which is where the generic name of the mollusks that produce it comes from.

In the British seas none of these cephalopods attain so large a size as to be formidable to man, as they do in warmer climates. It was asserted by Dens, an old navigator, that in the African seas, while three of his men were employed during a calm in scraping the sides of the vessel, they were attacked by a monstrous Cuttle-fish, which seized them in its arms, and drew two of them under water, the third man was with difficulty rescued by cutting off one of the creature’s limbs, which was as thick at the base as the fore-yard of the ship, and had suckers as large as ladles; the rescued sailor was so horrified by the monster, that he died delirious a few hours after. An account is also given of another crew who were similarly attacked off the coast of Angola; the creature threw its arms across the vessel, and had nearly succeeded in dragging it down, and was only prevented doing so by the severing of its limbs with swords and hatchets. A diligent observer of nature has asserted that in the Indian seas Cuttle-fish are often seen two fathoms broad across the centre, with arms nine fathoms long. Only think, what a monster! with a body twelve feet across, and eight or ten legs like water-snakes, some six and thirty feet long. Well may it be said, that the Indians when they go out in boats are in dread of such, and never sail without an axe for their protection.

In British waters, none of these cephalopods get large enough to pose a threat to people, unlike in warmer climates. An old navigator named Dens claimed that in the African seas, while three of his crew members were calmly scraping the ship's sides, they were attacked by a huge cuttlefish that grabbed them with its arms and pulled two of them underwater. The third man was barely saved by cutting off one of the creature's limbs, which was as thick as the ship’s fore-yard and had suckers the size of ladles. The rescued sailor was so traumatized by the encounter that he died delirious a few hours later. There's also a report of another crew that was similarly attacked off the coast of Angola; the creature wrapped its arms around the ship and nearly succeeded in dragging it down, only to be stopped by cutting its limbs with swords and hatchets. A careful observer of nature has said that in the Indian seas, cuttlefish are often seen two fathoms wide at the center, with arms nine fathoms long. Just imagine a creature with a body twelve feet across and eight or ten legs like water snakes, some stretching thirty-six feet long. It's no wonder that the locals dread these encounters and always carry an axe for protection when they head out in boats.

There is a story told by a gentleman named Beale, who, while searching for shells upon the rocks of the Bonin Islands, encountered a species of Cuttle-fish called by the whalers “the Rock-squid,” and rashly endeavoured to secure it. This cephalopod, whose body was not bigger than a large clenched hand, had tentacles at least four feet across, and having its retreat to the sea cut off by Mr. Beale, twined its limbs around that gentleman’s arm, which was bared to the shoulder for the purpose of thrusting into holes of the rocks after shells, and endeavoured to get its horny beak in a position for biting.[70] The narrator describes the sickening sensation of horror which chilled his very blood, as he felt the creature’s cold slimy grasp, and saw its large staring eyes fixed on him, and the beak opening and closing. He called loudly for help, and was soon joined by his companion, who relieved him by destroying the Cuttle-fish with a knife, and detaching the limbs piece by piece.

There's a story told by a man named Beale, who, while looking for shells on the rocks of the Bonin Islands, came across a type of cuttlefish called “the Rock-squid” by whalers, and foolishly tried to catch it. This cephalopod, which was no bigger than a large clenched hand, had tentacles that spread at least four feet wide. With its escape to the sea blocked by Mr. Beale, it wrapped its limbs around his arm, which was uncovered to the shoulder for reaching into rock crevices for shells, and tried to position its sharp beak to bite him.[70] The narrator describes the sickening feeling of horror that chilled his blood as he felt the creature’s cold, slimy grip, saw its big staring eyes fixed on him, and noticed its beak opening and closing. He called out for help, and was soon joined by his companion, who saved him by stabbing the cuttlefish with a knife and detaching its limbs one by one.

There are several species of these cephalopods; the most generally distributed appears to be the Octopus vulgaris, or Common Cuttle-fish, which is sometimes found on our own shores, where also may be obtained the Common Sepiola, S. vulgaris, usually about three inches long, and the Officinal Cuttle-fish, S. Officinalis, which is about a foot in length; we give below small figures of each of these three species, to show the difference in the shape: the two last, it will be observed, have, in addition to the eight tentacles, which give the generic name Octopus, signifying eight, two long side arms, the use of which does not appear to be very clearly determined.

There are several species of these cephalopods; the most widely distributed seems to be the Octopus vulgaris, or Common Cuttle-fish, which is sometimes found along our shores, where you can also find the Common Sepiola, S. vulgaris, usually about three inches long, and the Officinal Cuttle-fish, S. Officinalis, which is about a foot long. Below, we provide small illustrations of each of these three species to highlight the differences in their shape: the last two, as you will notice, have, in addition to the eight tentacles that give the generic name Octopus—meaning eight—two long side arms, the purpose of which is not very clearly defined.

O. VULGARIS. S. VULGARIS. S. OFFICINALIS.

[71]

[71]

NAUTILUS AND AMMONITE.

The Nautili are called testaceous cephalopods, our readers know, or ought to know, the meaning of both these terms. Like the Cuttle-fish they are sometimes called Polypi, because they have many arms or tentacles, the word poly, with which a great number of English words commence, being the Greek for many. An ancient writer named Aristotle, after describing the naked cephalopods, says, “There are also two polypi in shells; one is called by some, nautilus, and by others, nauticus. It is like the polypus, but its shell resembles a hollow comb or pecten, and is not attached. This polypus ordinarily feeds near the sea-shore; sometimes it is thrown by the waves on the dry land, and the shell falling from it, is caught, and there dies. The other is in a shell like a snail, and this does not go out of its shell, but remains in it like a snail, and sometimes stretches forth its cirrhi.” The first of these animals, there can be no doubt, is the Argonaut, or Paper Nautilus, and the latter that which is called the True Nautilus, of both of which species let us say a few words, which we will introduce by quoting some beautiful lines from a poem called “the Pelican Island,” by James Montgomery.

The Nautili are known as testaceous cephalopods, and our readers should know what both of these terms mean. Like the cuttlefish, they’re sometimes referred to as Polypi, which reflects their many arms or tentacles. The prefix poly, used in many English words, comes from Greek, meaning many. An ancient writer named Aristotle, after describing the naked cephalopods, states, “There are also two polypi in shells; one is called by some nautilus and by others nauticus. It resembles the polypus, but its shell looks like a hollow comb or pecten and is not attached. This polypus typically feeds near the shore; sometimes it gets washed ashore by the waves, and when the shell falls away, it dies there. The other has a shell like a snail, and it does not leave its shell but stays inside it like a snail, occasionally extending its cirrhi.” The first of these animals is undoubtedly the Argonaut, or Paper Nautilus, while the latter is known as the True Nautilus. We’ll share a few words about both species, starting with some beautiful lines from a poem called “The Pelican Island” by James Montgomery.

“Light as a flake of foam upon the wind,
Keel upwards from the deep, emerged a shell,
Shaped like the moon ere half her orb is filled:
Fraught with young life it righted as it rose,
And moved at will along the yielding water.
The native pilot of this little bark
Put out a tier of oars on either side;
Spread to the wafted breeze a two-fold sail,
And mounted up and glided down the billow,
In happy freedom, pleased to feel the air,
And wander in the luxury of light.”

The tiny mariner here alluded to, is the Paper Nautilus, common in the Mediterranean and some tropical seas; its scientific name is Argonauta argo. In the mythology, we read that Argo was the name of a ship that carried a certain Grecian named Jason, and a crew of argives in search of adventures; some say that the term is derived from a Greek word signifying swift: this party of mariners, said to be the first that ever[72] sailed upon the sea, was called Argonauts, or, as it might be freely translated, seamen of the ship Argo. Nauticus, in Latin, signifies anything relating to ships or navigation, and here you have the whole origin of the name of this little Argonaut, about which we must sing you a song written by Mary Howitt, before we proceed further:—

The tiny sailor mentioned here is the Paper Nautilus, which is common in the Mediterranean and some tropical seas; its scientific name is Argonauta argo. In mythology, we learn that Argo was the name of a ship that carried a Greek named Jason and a crew of Argives in search of adventures; some say the term comes from a Greek word meaning swift: this group of sailors, said to be the first to ever sail on the sea, was called Argonauts, or, as it might be freely translated, sailors of the ship Argo. Nauticus, in Latin, means anything related to ships or navigation, and here you have the complete origin of the name of this little Argonaut, about which we must share a song written by Mary Howitt before we go any further:—

“Who was the first sailor; tell me who can;
Old father Neptune?—no, you’re wrong,
There was another ere Neptune began;
Who was he? tell me. Tightly and strong,
Over the waters he went—he went,
Over the waters he went!
Who was the first sailor? tell me who can;
Old father Noah!—no, you’re wrong,
There was another ere Noah began,
Who was he? tell me. Tightly and strong,
Over the waters he went—he went,
Over the waters he went.
Who was the first sailor? tell me who can;
Old father Jason?—no, you’re wrong,
There was another ere Jason began,
Don’t be a blockhead, boy! Tightly and strong,
Over the waters he went—he went,
Over the waters he went.
Ha! ’tis nought but the poor little Nautilus—
Sailing away in his pearly shell;
He has no need of a compass like us,
Foul or fair weather he manages well!
Over the water he goes—he goes,
Over the water he goes.”

Many more poems of the like nature we might quote, for this little shelled cephalopod has been a favourite with the poets time out of mind, and in some instances they and the less imaginative naturalists have disagreed in their accounts of its form and operations, for instance, Pope says—

Many more poems like this could be quoted because this little shelled cephalopod has been a favorite of poets for a long time, and in some cases, they and the less imaginative naturalists have disagreed about its shape and behavior. For example, Pope says—

“Learn of the little Nautilus to sail,
Spread the thin oar and catch the driving gale.”

“Catch a fiddle-stick,” say some naturalists, the little Nautilus does nothing of the sort; and if you go to him to learn navigation, you will never be much of a sailor; he may teach you how to sink to the bottom and rise again, and that kind[73] of knowledge might be worth something to you if you could breathe under water; and he might teach you how to swim, but not how to sail, for in spite of all poetic theories, he does the former and not the latter. Most usually he walks about at the bottom of the sea on his long arms, something like the Cuttle-fish, feeding on the marine vegetation; the shell is then uppermost; if we could look inside of it we should see numerous little chambers or cells, the larger and outermost of which only are inhabited by the mollusk, the others being filled with air render the whole light and buoyant. Through the centre of these chambers, down to the smallest of them, runs a membranous tube which can be exhausted or filled with fluid at the pleasure of the animal, and the difference thus effected in the weight of the shell enables it to sink or swim; in the latter case, up it goes to the surface, and “keel upwards from the deep,” emerges, as the poet has said, but once there it soon reverses its position. The shell becomes like a boat it is true, but its inhabitant neither points a sail nor plies the oar, but propels itself along stem foremost by a muscular action, which by alternately compressing and loosening a kind of siphon, throws out jets or gushes of water, which by the resistance they meet with from the surrounding fluid, give the desired onward motion, and away the swimmer goes, his long arms gathered closely together, and streaming behind like the tail of a comet, and its round eyes keeping a sharp look-out on either side. Should it espy danger, the body and limbs are withdrawn into the shell, and the fluid driven through the central tube, so as to compress the air in the pearly cells, and down sinks the swimmer once again to his native depths, where

“Catch a fiddle-stick,” some naturalists say, but the little Nautilus does nothing of the sort; if you go to him to learn navigation, you won’t become much of a sailor. He might teach you how to sink to the bottom and rise again, and that kind of knowledge could be valuable if you could breathe underwater; he might also show you how to swim, but not how to sail. Despite all poetic theories, he does the former and not the latter. Usually, he walks around at the bottom of the sea on his long arms, similar to the Cuttlefish, feeding on marine vegetation; the shell is on top. If we could look inside, we would see numerous little chambers or cells, the largest and outermost of which are occupied by the mollusk, while the others are filled with air, making the whole structure light and buoyant. A membranous tube runs through the center of these chambers, down to the smallest one, which can be emptied or filled with fluid at the animal's will. This change in the weight of the shell allows it to sink or swim; when it swims, it rises to the surface and “keel upwards from the deep,” as the poet said, but once there, it quickly flips its position. The shell resembles a boat, it’s true, but its inhabitant neither sets a sail nor rows; instead, it propels itself headfirst through muscular contractions that alternately compress and release a siphon, expelling jets or bursts of water. The resistance from the surrounding fluid provides the desired forward motion, and away the swimmer goes, its long arms pulled close together and trailing behind like a comet's tail, with its round eyes scanning for danger. If it spots a threat, the body and limbs retract into the shell, the fluid is forced through the central tube to compress the air in the pearly cells, and down sinks the swimmer once again to its native depths, where

“The floor is of sand like the mountain drift,
And the pearl shells’ spangle the flinty snow;
And from coral rocks the sea-plants lift
Their boughs where the tides and billows flow,
The water is calm and still below.
For the winds and waves are absent there;
And the sands are bright as the stars that glow
In the motionless fields of upper air.
And life in rare and beautiful forms,
Is sporting amid those bowers of stone,
And is safe, when the wrathful spirit of storms,
Has made the top of the waves his own.”

[74]

[74]

We give below two figures of the Argonaut, one of which represents him crawling at the bottom of the sea, and the other swimming on the surface.

We provide two images of the Argonaut below, one showing it crawling along the ocean floor, and the other depicting it swimming on the surface.

Two figures of the Argonaut

The True, or Pearly Nautilus, (N. Pompilius,) the origin of whose specific name we have been unable to discover, is much like the Argonaut in appearance and general construction; the shell is externally smoother and more iridescent, it is also generally somewhat thicker than the former kind, and has internally more chambers or divisions; its pearly lustre renders it a beautiful ornament, and the large size it frequently attains a very conspicuous one. Its inhabitant has several peculiarities of organization, which distinguish it from the Argonauts, but into these we need not enter; neither can we pause to describe the other species of nautili, the shells of which, like those of the Cowry and other univalves, are covered with a membrane which hides their beauty. This membrane or mantle sometimes extends some distance beyond the edge of the shell, and, being of a light and filmy appearance, may have been mistaken for a sail hoisted by the creature to catch the breeze, while its long arms, thrust up into the air or down into the water, may have been thought to be masts or oars, so that the poets are not so much to be blamed, if they say as Wordsworth does.

The True, or Pearly Nautilus, (N. Pompilius), whose specific name we haven't been able to trace, looks quite similar to the Argonaut in its appearance and overall structure. The shell is smoother and more iridescent on the outside, generally thicker than the former type, and has more internal chambers or divisions. Its pearly shine makes it a lovely ornament, and its large size often makes it very noticeable. Its inhabitant has several unique features that set it apart from the Argonauts, but we won’t go into those here; we also won’t describe the other nautilus species, whose shells, like those of the Cowry and other univalves, are covered with a membrane that hides their beauty. This membrane or mantle sometimes extends out beyond the edge of the shell, and because it has a light and filmy appearance, it could easily be mistaken for a sail being raised by the creature to catch the wind, while its long arms, reaching up into the air or down into the water, might be interpreted as masts or oars, so poets can be forgiven for saying things like Wordsworth does.

“Spread, tiny Nautilus, the living sail,
Dive at thy choice, or catch the freshening gale.”

Nearly allied to the Nautili are these beautiful fossil shells called Ammonites, from their fancied resemblance to the horns of a heathen deity or god, called Jupiter Ammon. These shells, at once the wonder and pride of geologists, are found in the chalk formations, and thousands of years must have passed away since they were inhabited by living creatures.[75] The Nautili which swam and sported with them at the depths of the ocean, as is proved by the shells of many species found in the same chalky deposits, have still their living representatives, but those winding galleries and pearly chambers once fragile as paper and brittle as glass, now turned into, and surrounded by solid stone, are all shells of extinct species, and we can hardly see and handle them without some degree of awe and reverence; when we reflect on the great and wonderful changes that have passed over the earth since they were formed by a hand divine, instinct with the breath of life, and then to be embedded in the rock as everlasting characters by which the unborn generations of men might read in history of those changes, and of the providential dealings of God with his creatures. Of these Ammonites, and other fossil shells, much more will have to be said in our proposed geological volume; the poem which follows will very appropriately conclude the above remarks, and our present little work on shells—beautiful, wonderful shells! useful, ornamental, instructive! The subject is one which we would earnestly invite our young readers to study: it is but here introduced; we have picked up a few, very few, of the wonders and beauties of conchology, and presented them to their notice in the hope that they may be induced to desire a more intimate acquaintance with this branch of natural science, which has been hitherto greatly neglected. To understand it thoroughly, much attention and perseverance will be required, but even a slight acquaintance with it will yield both pleasure and profit to the mind.

Closely related to the Nautili are these beautiful fossil shells called Ammonites, named for their imagined resemblance to the horns of a pagan god known as Jupiter Ammon. These shells, which are both a wonder and a source of pride for geologists, are found in chalk formations, and many thousands of years have passed since they were home to living creatures.[75] The Nautili that swam and played alongside them in the deep ocean, as evidenced by the shells of many species found in the same chalky deposits, still have living representatives today. However, those winding galleries and pearly chambers, once as fragile as paper and as brittle as glass, are now transformed and surrounded by solid stone; they are all shells of extinct species, and we can hardly see and handle them without feeling a sense of awe and respect. We reflect on the significant and amazing changes that have taken place on Earth since they were formed by a divine hand, filled with the breath of life, only to be embedded in rock as lasting markers for future generations to read about the history of these changes and God's dealings with his creatures. More will be said about these Ammonites and other fossil shells in our upcoming geological volume; the poem that follows will fittingly conclude our previous remarks and our current small work on shells—beautiful, amazing shells! useful, decorative, educational! This is a subject we strongly encourage our young readers to explore: it’s just been introduced here. We have picked up only a few of the wonders and beauties of conchology and presented them here in the hope that they will inspire a deeper curiosity about this branch of natural science, which has been greatly neglected. To fully understand it, much attention and perseverance are needed, but even a small understanding will bring both joy and benefit to the mind.

NAUTILUS.
AMMONITE.

[76]

[76]

THE NAUTILUS AND THE AMMONITE.

The Nautilus and the Ammonite,
Were launched in storm and strife;
Each sent to float in its tiny boat,
On the wide, wild sea of life.
And each could swim on the ocean’s brim,
And anon its sails could furl,
And sink to sleep in the great sea deep,
In a palace all of pearl.
And their’s was a bliss more fair than this,
That we feel in our colder time;
For they were rife in a tropic life,
In a brighter, happier clime.
They swam ’mid isles whose summer smiles
No wintry winds annoy;
Whose groves were palm, whose air was balm,
Whose life was only joy.
They roam’d all day through creek and bay,
And travers’d the ocean deep;
And at night they sank on a coral bank,
In its fairy bowers to sleep.
And the monsters vast of ages past,
They beheld in their ocean caves;
And saw them ride in their power and pride,
And sink in their billowy graves.
Thus hand in hand, from strand to strand,
They sail’d in mirth and glee;
Those fairy shells, with their crystal cells,
Twin creatures of the sea.
But they came at last to a sea long past,
And as they reach’d its shore,
The Almighty’s breath spake out in death,
And the Ammonite liv’d no more.
And the Nautilus now in its shelly prow,
As o’er the deep it strays,
Still seems to seek in bay and creek,
Its companion of other days.
And thus do we, in life’s stormy sea,
As we roam from shore to shore;
While tempest-tost, seek the lov’d—the lost,
But find them on earth no more!
G.F. Richardson.

Plate I, Figures 1-6

Plate I.

Plate 1.

Plate II, Figures 1-4

Plate II.

Plate II.

Plate III, Figures 1-5

Plate III.

Plate 3.

Plate IV, Figures 1-6

Plate IV.

Plate IV.

Plate V, Figures 1-5

Plate V.

Plate V.

Plate VI, Figures 1-5

Plate VI.

Plate 6.

Plate VIII, Figures 1-5

Plate VII.

Plate 7.

Plate VIII, Figures 1-4

Plate VIII.

Plate 8.


[77]

[77]

INDEX.

PAGE.
INTRODUCTION.
What are Shells iii
Conchology iv
Beauty and Value of Shells vi
Uses of Shells viii
The Inhabitants of Shells xi
Malacology ib
Classification of Shells xii
Taking and Preserving Shells xiii
The Cabinet ib
On Cleaning and Polishing Shells xv
Fossil Shells ib
UNIVALVES.
The Common Snail 18
Fresh-water Shells 23
The Whelk 26
Rock Shells 27
Periwinkle 29
Trochus, or Top-Shell 31
Cones, Volutes, Mitres, and Olives 35
Cowries 38[78]
BIVALVES.
The Oyster 41
Pearls 49
The Mussel and the Cockle 51
Scallop Shells 57
Limpits 59
Bock-borers 61
MULTIVALVES.
The Chitons 63
Barnacles 64
Cuttle Fish 67
Nautilus and Ammonite 71

WORKS BY H. G. ADAMS.


Second Edition, Coloured Illustrations, elegantly bound, price 3s. 6d.

Second Edition, Color Illustrations, beautifully bound, price £3.30.

FAVOURITE SONG BIRDS.

Favorite songbirds.

Containing a description of the Feathered Songsters of Britain, with an account of their Haunts, Habits, and Characteristic Traits; interspersed with choice passages from the Poets, and quotations from eminent Naturalists.

Containing a description of the Feathered Songsters of Britain, with an account of their habitats, behaviors, and distinctive traits; interspersed with selected passages from poets and quotes from notable naturalists.


In Fcap. 8vo. cloth, with Vignette Portraits, price 6s. 6d.

In a small 8vo cloth edition, featuring Vignette Portraits, priced at £6.50.

A CYCLOPÆDIA OF POETICAL QUOTATIONS.

A Dictionary of Poetic Quotes.

Consisting of Choice Passages from the Poets of every age and country, classified under distinct heads, and alphabetically arranged for ready reference.

Consisting of selected excerpts from poets of every era and country, organized under specific categories and arranged alphabetically for easy access.


In Fcap. 8vo., cloth, with Vignette Portraits, price 6s. 6d.

In a 8vo format, cloth binding, featuring Vignette Portraits, priced at £6.50.

A CYCLOPÆDIA OF SACRED POETICAL QUOTATIONS.

A CYCLOPEDIA OF SACRED POETICAL QUOTATIONS.

Classified and arranged under Subject Headings, illustrated by striking Passages from Scripture, and forming altogether a Complete Book of Devotional Poetry.

Classified and organized by subject headings, featuring impactful passages from Scripture, and collectively creating a complete book of devotional poetry.


THE YOUNG NATURALIST’S LIBRARY.

THE YOUNG NATURALIST'S LIBRARY.


Price 1s. each, in Ornamental Cover; 1s. 6d., Cloth Gilt.

Price 1s. each, in Decorative Cover; 1s. 6d., Cloth with Gold Leaf.

I.

I.

NESTS AND EGGS OF FAMILIAR BRITISH BIRDS.

NESTS AND EGGS OF COMMON BRITISH BIRDS.

With Eight Plates, containing Forty-eight Figures of Eggs, drawn and coloured from Nature.

With Eight Plates, featuring Forty-eight Illustrations of Eggs, drawn and colored from Nature.


II.

II.

BEAUTIFUL BUTTERFLIES—BRITISH SPECIES.

Beautiful Butterflies - UK Species.

Containing the History of a Butterfly through all its changes and transformations; with Eight Coloured Plates, illustrating Twenty-two Species.

Containing the history of a butterfly through all its changes and transformations; with eight color plates, illustrating twenty-two species.


III.

III.

BEAUTIFUL SHELLS.

Pretty shells.

Their Nature, Structure, and Uses familiarly explained; with Eight Coloured Plates, and numerous Wood Engravings.

Their nature, structure, and uses explained in a straightforward way, featuring eight colored plates and numerous wood engravings.


IV.

IV.

HUMMING BIRDS,

Hummingbirds,

Described and Illustrated, and an Introductory Sketch on their Structure, Plumage, etc.; with Eight Coloured Plates, and several Wood Engravings.

Described and Illustrated, along with an Introductory Overview of their Structure, Plumage, etc.; featuring Eight Color Plates and several Wood Engravings.


LONDON: GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATERNOSTER ROW.

LONDON: GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATER NOSTER ROW.


NOW PUBLISHING.

LOWE’S FOREIGN FERNS.

LOWE'S IMPORTED FERN PLANTS.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF FERNS, Exotic and British, in Monthly Parts, Price One Shilling; each Part containing Four Coloured Plates, and numerous Wood Engravings. By E. J. LOWE, ESQ., F.R.A.S., F.G.S., etc.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF FERNS, Exotic and British, in Monthly Parts, Price One Shilling; each Part containing Four Coloured Plates, and numerous Wood Engravings. By E. J. LOWE, ESQ., F.R.A.S., F.G.S., etc.

“It is really the cheapest work for its excellence we have ever seen.”—Athenæum.

“It is truly the best value for its quality we have ever seen.”—Athenæum.

A HISTORY OF BRITISH BIRDS. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In 1s. Parts, Royal 8vo.; each containing Four Accurately-Coloured Engravings. Vol. 5 Completed, price 17s., Cloth Gilt. Cases for binding the Vols., 2s. each.

A HISTORY OF BRITISH BIRDS. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B.A. In 1s. Parts, Royal 8vo.; each containing Four Accurately-Colored Engravings. Volume 5 Completed, price 17s., Cloth Gilt. Cases for binding the Volumes, 2s. each.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF THE NESTS AND EGGS OF BRITISH BIRDS. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A., In 1s. Parts, Royal 8vo.; each containing Four Coloured Plates. Vol. 3 Completed, price 21s. Cases for binding the Vols., 2s. each.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF THE NESTS AND EGGS OF BRITISH BIRDS. By REV. F. O. MORRIS, B.A., In 1s. Parts, Royal 8vo.; each containing Four Color Plates. Volume 3 Completed, price 21s. Cases for binding the volumes, 2s. each.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF BRITISH BUTTERFLIES. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In 1 Vol., Royal 8vo., price 20s. It may also be had in 1s. Parts. Case for binding the Vol., 2s.

A NATURAL HISTORY OF BRITISH BUTTERFLIES. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In 1 Volume, Royal 8vo, price £20. It is also available in 1s. parts. A case for binding the volume costs 2s.

A BIBLE NATURAL HISTORY. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In Imperial 16mo., price 10s. 6d., Cloth, with 160 Coloured Engravings. To be had also in 20 Parts at 6d., each containing Eight Coloured Plates.

A BIBLE NATURAL HISTORY. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. Available in Imperial 16mo., priced at £10.60, Cloth edition, featuring 160 Colored Illustrations. It can also be purchased in 20 Parts at 60p each, with each part containing eight colored plates.

A BOOK OF NATURAL HISTORY. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In Imperial 16mo., price 10s. 6d., Cloth, with 160 Coloured Engravings.

A BOOK OF NATURAL HISTORY. By the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B. A. In Imperial 16mo., priced at £10.60, Cloth, with 160 Colored Illustrations.

THE NATURALIST; a Magazine of Natural History in all its branches. Conducted by the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B.A. Published on the 1st. of each month in Royal 8vo., 24 pages, price 6d., with occasional Engravings.

THE NATURALIST; a magazine about natural history in all its aspects. Edited by the REV. F. O. MORRIS, B.A. Published on the 1st of each month in Royal 8vo., 24 pages, priced at 6d., with occasional illustrations.

THE DAHLIA: its History and Cultivation, with Descriptions of all the best Show Flowers. By ROBERT HOGG. Royal 8vo., price 2s. 6d., illustrated with Nine Coloured Plates, from Original Drawings, expressly executed for this Work, by James Andrews.

THE DAHLIA: its History and Cultivation, with Descriptions of all the best Show Flowers. By ROBERT HOGG. Royal 8vo., price £2.50, illustrated with Nine Coloured Plates, from Original Drawings, specifically created for this Work, by James Andrews.

THE INDIAN WIFE; a Tale. By O. S. ROUND, ESQ. Price One Shilling.

THE INDIAN WIFE; a Story. By O. S. ROUND, ESQ. Price One Shilling.


LONDON:
GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATERNOSTER ROW.

LONDON:
GROOMBRIDGE AND SONS, 5, PATERNOSTER ROW.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!