This is a modern-English version of Edison: His Life and Inventions, originally written by Dyer, Frank Lewis, Martin, Thomas Commerford.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
EDISON HIS LIFE AND INVENTIONS
By Frank Lewis Dyer
General Counsel For The Edison Laboratory And Allied Interests
And
Thomas Commerford Martin
Ex-President Of The American Institute Of Electrical Engineers
CONTENTS
EDISON HIS LIFE AND INVENTIONS
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER X
CHAPTER XI
CHAPTER XII
CHAPTER XIII
CHAPTER XIV
CHAPTER XV
CHAPTER XVI
CHAPTER XVII
CHAPTER XVIII
CHAPTER XIX
CHAPTER XX
CHAPTER XXI
CHAPTER XXII
CHAPTER XXIII
CHAPTER XXIV
CHAPTER XXV
CHAPTER XXVI
CHAPTER XXVII
CHAPTER XXVIII
CHAPTER XXIX
II. THE QUADRUPLEX AND PHONOPLEX
XIII. EDISON'S ELECTRIC RAILWAY
XV. KINETOGRAPH AND PROJECTING KINETOSCOPE
XVI. EDISON'S ORE-MILLING INVENTIONS
XVIII. EDISON'S NEW STORAGE BATTERY
CONTENTS
EDISON HIS LIFE AND INVENTIONS
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_13__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_14__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_15__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_16__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_17__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_18__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_19__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_20__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_21__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_22__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_23__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_24__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_25__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_26__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_27__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_28__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_29__
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_30__
II. THE QUADRUPLEX AND PHONOPLEX
XIII. EDISON'S ELECTRIC RAILWAY
XV. KINETOGRAPH AND PROJECTING KINETOSCOPE
XVI. EDISON'S ORE-MILLING INVENTIONS
XVIII. EDISON'S NEW STORAGE BATTERY
INTRODUCTION
PRIOR to this, no complete, authentic, and authorized record of the work of Mr. Edison, during an active life, has been given to the world. That life, if there is anything in heredity, is very far from finished; and while it continues there will be new achievement.
PRIOR to this, no complete, genuine, and official account of Mr. Edison's work throughout his active life has been presented to the world. That life, if heredity means anything, is far from over; and as long as it goes on, there will be new accomplishments.
An insistently expressed desire on the part of the public for a definitive biography of Edison was the reason for the following pages. The present authors deem themselves happy in the confidence reposed in them, and in the constant assistance they have enjoyed from Mr. Edison while preparing these pages, a great many of which are altogether his own. This co-operation in no sense relieves the authors of responsibility as to any of the views or statements of their own that the book contains. They have realized the extreme reluctance of Mr. Edison to be made the subject of any biography at all; while he has felt that, if it must be written, it were best done by the hands of friends and associates of long standing, whose judgment and discretion he could trust, and whose intimate knowledge of the facts would save him from misrepresentation.
A strong desire from the public for a definitive biography of Edison is what led to these pages. The authors are grateful for the trust placed in them and for the continuous support they received from Mr. Edison while preparing this work, much of which reflects his own words. This collaboration does not, however, free the authors from responsibility for their own opinions or statements in the book. They understand Mr. Edison's deep reluctance to be the subject of any biography, yet he believed that if one had to be written, it should be by long-time friends and associates whose judgment and discretion he trusts, and whose close knowledge of the facts would prevent any misrepresentation.
The authors of the book are profoundly conscious of the fact that the extraordinary period of electrical development embraced in it has been prolific of great men. They have named some of them; but there has been no idea of setting forth various achievements or of ascribing distinctive merits. This treatment is devoted to one man whom his fellow-citizens have chosen to regard as in many ways representative of the American at his finest flowering in the field of invention during the nineteenth century.
The authors of the book are well aware that the remarkable period of electrical development covered in it has produced many great individuals. They have mentioned some of them, but there’s no intention of detailing various achievements or attributing specific merits. This section focuses on one man whom his fellow citizens have chosen to see as a representation of the American spirit at its best in the field of invention during the nineteenth century.
It is designed in these pages to bring the reader face to face with Edison; to glance at an interesting childhood and a youthful period marked by a capacity for doing things, and by an insatiable thirst for knowledge; then to accompany him into the great creative stretch of forty years, during which he has done so much. This book shows him plunged deeply into work for which he has always had an incredible capacity, reveals the exercise of his unsurpassed inventive ability, his keen reasoning powers, his tenacious memory, his fertility of resource; follows him through a series of innumerable experiments, conducted methodically, reaching out like rays of search-light into all the regions of science and nature, and finally exhibits him emerging triumphantly from countless difficulties bearing with him in new arts the fruits of victorious struggle.
This book is created to bring you up close with Edison; to take a look at his fascinating childhood and the young years filled with a drive to achieve and an endless curiosity. It then guides you through his incredible forty-year creative journey, where he accomplished so much. You’ll see him deeply engaged in work he has always excelled in, showcasing his unparalleled inventiveness, sharp reasoning, strong memory, and resourcefulness. It tracks him through countless experiments conducted with precision, exploring all areas of science and nature, and ultimately highlights him emerging successfully from numerous challenges, bringing with him the rewards of hard-earned innovation in new technologies.
These volumes aim to be a biography rather than a history of electricity, but they have had to cover so much general ground in defining the relations and contributions of Edison to the electrical arts, that they serve to present a picture of the whole development effected in the last fifty years, the most fruitful that electricity has known. The effort has been made to avoid technique and abstruse phrases, but some degree of explanation has been absolutely necessary in regard to each group of inventions. The task of the authors has consisted largely in summarizing fairly the methods and processes employed by Edison; and some idea of the difficulties encountered by them in so doing may be realized from the fact that one brief chapter, for example,—that on ore milling—covers nine years of most intense application and activity on the part of the inventor. It is something like exhibiting the geological eras of the earth in an outline lantern slide, to reduce an elaborate series of strenuous experiments and a vast variety of ingenious apparatus to the space of a few hundred words.
These volumes aim to be a biography rather than a history of electricity, but they have had to cover so much general territory in defining Edison’s relationships and contributions to electrical engineering that they provide a picture of the entire development over the last fifty years, the most productive period that electricity has experienced. The authors worked to avoid technical jargon and complex phrases, but some explanation was definitely necessary for each group of inventions. The authors' main job has been to fairly summarize the methods and processes Edison used; and the challenges they faced in doing this can be highlighted by the fact that one short chapter, for instance—that on ore milling—covers nine years of intense effort and activity by the inventor. It’s similar to trying to display the geological eras of the earth on a simple outline slide, condensing a complex series of rigorous experiments and a wide array of clever devices into just a few hundred words.
A great deal of this narrative is given in Mr. Edison's own language, from oral or written statements made in reply to questions addressed to him with the object of securing accuracy. A further large part is based upon the personal contributions of many loyal associates; and it is desired here to make grateful acknowledgment to such collaborators as Messrs. Samuel Insull, E. H. Johnson, F. R. Upton, R. N Dyer, S. B. Eaton, Francis Jehl, W. S. Andrews, W. J. Jenks, W. J. Hammer, F. J. Sprague, W. S. Mallory, and C. L. Clarke, and others, without whose aid the issuance of this book would indeed have been impossible. In particular, it is desired to acknowledge indebtedness to Mr. W. H. Meadowcroft not only for substantial aid in the literary part of the work, but for indefatigable effort to group, classify, and summarize the boundless material embodied in Edison's note-books and memorabilia of all kinds now kept at the Orange laboratory. Acknowledgment must also be made of the courtesy and assistance of Mrs. Edison, and especially of the loan of many interesting and rare photographs from her private collection.
A lot of this story is shared in Mr. Edison’s own words, taken from his spoken or written responses to questions aimed at ensuring accuracy. Another significant portion is based on the personal input of many dedicated associates; and here, we want to express our heartfelt thanks to collaborators like Messrs. Samuel Insull, E. H. Johnson, F. R. Upton, R. N. Dyer, S. B. Eaton, Francis Jehl, W. S. Andrews, W. J. Jenks, W. J. Hammer, F. J. Sprague, W. S. Mallory, C. L. Clarke, and others, without whom producing this book would truly have been impossible. In particular, we want to recognize Mr. W. H. Meadowcroft for his significant contributions to the writing and for his tireless efforts to organize, classify, and summarize the vast amount of material found in Edison's notebooks and various memorabilia now housed at the Orange laboratory. We must also acknowledge the kindness and support of Mrs. Edison, especially for loaning many interesting and rare photographs from her private collection.
EDISON HIS LIFE AND INVENTIONS
CHAPTER I
THE AGE OF ELECTRICITY
THE year 1847 marked a period of great territorial acquisition by the American people, with incalculable additions to their actual and potential wealth. By the rational compromise with England in the dispute over the Oregon region, President Polk had secured during 1846, for undisturbed settlement, three hundred thousand square miles of forest, fertile land, and fisheries, including the whole fair Columbia Valley. Our active "policy of the Pacific" dated from that hour. With swift and clinching succession came the melodramatic Mexican War, and February, 1848, saw another vast territory south of Oregon and west of the Rocky Mountains added by treaty to the United States. Thus in about eighteen months there had been pieced into the national domain for quick development and exploitation a region as large as the entire Union of Thirteen States at the close of the War of Independence. Moreover, within its boundaries was embraced all the great American gold-field, just on the eve of discovery, for Marshall had detected the shining particles in the mill-race at the foot of the Sierra Nevada nine days before Mexico signed away her rights in California and in all the vague, remote hinterland facing Cathayward.
The year 1847 was a time of significant territorial gains for the American people, with immense additions to their actual and potential wealth. Through a reasonable agreement with England over the Oregon region, President Polk had secured, in 1846, three hundred thousand square miles of forests, fertile land, and fisheries for peaceful settlement, including the beautiful Columbia Valley. Our active "policy of the Pacific" started from that moment. Following that, the dramatic Mexican War began, and in February 1848, another vast territory south of Oregon and west of the Rocky Mountains was added to the United States through a treaty. In just about eighteen months, an area as large as the entire original Thirteen States at the end of the War of Independence had been incorporated into the national domain for quick development and exploitation. Additionally, within its boundaries lay all the great American gold fields, just about to be discovered, as Marshall had noticed the shiny particles in the mill-race at the foot of the Sierra Nevada nine days before Mexico gave up its rights in California and all the distant, remote lands looking towards China.
Equally momentous were the times in Europe, where the attempt to secure opportunities of expansion as well as larger liberty for the individual took quite different form. The old absolutist system of government was fast breaking up, and ancient thrones were tottering. The red lava of deep revolutionary fires oozed up through many glowing cracks in the political crust, and all the social strata were shaken. That the wild outbursts of insurrection midway in the fifth decade failed and died away was not surprising, for the superincumbent deposits of tradition and convention were thick. But the retrospect indicates that many reforms and political changes were accomplished, although the process involved the exile of not a few ardent spirits to America, to become leading statesmen, inventors, journalists, and financiers. In 1847, too, Russia began her tremendous march eastward into Central Asia, just as France was solidifying her first gains on the littoral of northern Africa. In England the fierce fervor of the Chartist movement, with its violent rhetoric as to the rights of man, was sobering down and passing pervasively into numerous practical schemes for social and political amelioration, constituting in their entirety a most profound change throughout every part of the national life.
Just as significant were the times in Europe, where the push for expansion and greater individual freedom took on a different shape. The old absolutist system of government was rapidly falling apart, and ancient thrones were shaky. The intense revolutionary spirit was bubbling up through many cracks in the political landscape, shaking all social classes. It wasn't surprising that the explosive uprisings in the middle of the 1850s faltered and faded away, as the weight of tradition and convention was substantial. However, looking back, it's clear that many reforms and political changes took place, even though this process led to the exile of several passionate individuals to America, where they became influential statesmen, inventors, journalists, and financiers. In 1847, Russia also began her massive advance eastward into Central Asia, just as France was solidifying her initial gains along the northern African coast. In England, the intense energy of the Chartist movement, with its fiery talk about human rights, was calming down and transforming into various practical plans for social and political improvement, resulting in a significant change throughout all aspects of national life.
Into such times Thomas Alva Edison was born, and his relations to them and to the events of the past sixty years are the subject of this narrative. Aside from the personal interest that attaches to the picturesque career, so typically American, there is a broader aspect in which the work of the "Franklin of the Nineteenth Century" touches the welfare and progress of the race. It is difficult at any time to determine the effect of any single invention, and the investigation becomes more difficult where inventions of the first class have been crowded upon each other in rapid and bewildering succession. But it will be admitted that in Edison one deals with a central figure of the great age that saw the invention and introduction in practical form of the telegraph, the submarine cable, the telephone, the electric light, the electric railway, the electric trolley-car, the storage battery, the electric motor, the phonograph, the wireless telegraph; and that the influence of these on the world's affairs has not been excelled at any time by that of any other corresponding advances in the arts and sciences. These pages deal with Edison's share in the great work of the last half century in abridging distance, communicating intelligence, lessening toil, improving illumination, recording forever the human voice; and on behalf of inventive genius it may be urged that its beneficent results and gifts to mankind compare with any to be credited to statesman, warrior, or creative writer of the same period.
During a time of great change, Thomas Alva Edison was born, and his connections to those times and the events of the past sixty years are what this narrative explores. Beyond the personal interest in his colorful, distinctly American career, there's a larger perspective regarding how the work of the "Franklin of the Nineteenth Century" impacts the well-being and progression of humanity. It’s always challenging to pinpoint the effect of any single invention, and it becomes even trickier when major inventions have come one after another in quick and often confusing succession. However, it's clear that Edison stands out as a central figure in the remarkable era that saw the invention and practical application of the telegraph, submarine cable, telephone, electric light, electric railway, electric trolley, storage battery, electric motor, phonograph, and wireless telegraph. The impact of these innovations on global affairs has never been surpassed by any other advancements in the arts and sciences. These pages focus on Edison's contributions to the monumental work of the last fifty years in reducing distances, communicating information, alleviating labor, enhancing lighting, and permanently recording the human voice; and it's worth noting that the positive outcomes and gifts brought about by inventive genius can compare favorably to those credited to statesmen, warriors, or creative writers of the same era.
Viewed from the standpoint of inventive progress, the first half of the nineteenth century had passed very profitably when Edison appeared—every year marked by some notable achievement in the arts and sciences, with promise of its early and abundant fruition in commerce and industry. There had been exactly four decades of steam navigation on American waters. Railways were growing at the rate of nearly one thousand miles annually. Gas had become familiar as a means of illumination in large cities. Looms and tools and printing-presses were everywhere being liberated from the slow toil of man-power. The first photographs had been taken. Chloroform, nitrous oxide gas, and ether had been placed at the service of the physician in saving life, and the revolver, guncotton, and nitroglycerine added to the agencies for slaughter. New metals, chemicals, and elements had become available in large numbers, gases had been liquefied and solidified, and the range of useful heat and cold indefinitely extended. The safety-lamp had been given to the miner, the caisson to the bridge-builder, the anti-friction metal to the mechanic for bearings. It was already known how to vulcanize rubber, and how to galvanize iron. The application of machinery in the harvest-field had begun with the embryonic reaper, while both the bicycle and the automobile were heralded in primitive prototypes. The gigantic expansion of the iron and steel industry was foreshadowed in the change from wood to coal in the smelting furnaces. The sewing-machine had brought with it, like the friction match, one of the most profound influences in modifying domestic life, and making it different from that of all preceding time.
From the perspective of innovation, the first half of the nineteenth century was very productive by the time Edison arrived—each year marked by significant advancements in arts and sciences, promising swift and abundant returns in business and industry. There had been a solid forty years of steam navigation on American waters. Railways were expanding by nearly a thousand miles each year. Gas lighting had become common in major cities. Looms, tools, and printing presses were increasingly being powered by machines instead of manual labor. The first photographs had been captured. Chloroform, nitrous oxide, and ether were now available to doctors for saving lives, while revolvers, guncotton, and nitroglycerin contributed to destruction. A variety of new metals, chemicals, and elements had become widely available, gases had been turned into liquids and solids, and the range of effective heat and cold had significantly increased. Miners were provided with safety lamps, bridge builders used caissons, and mechanics benefited from anti-friction metals for bearings. It was already known how to vulcanize rubber and galvanize iron. Machinery began to be used in farming with the early reaper, while both the bicycle and the automobile were introduced in primitive forms. The massive growth of the iron and steel industry was hinted at by the shift from wood to coal in smelting operations. The sewing machine, along with the friction match, had a profound impact on transforming domestic life, making it distinct from any previous era.
Even in 1847 few of these things had lost their novelty, most of them were in the earlier stages of development. But it is when we turn to electricity that the rich virgin condition of an illimitable new kingdom of discovery is seen. Perhaps the word "utilization" or "application" is better than discovery, for then, as now, an endless wealth of phenomena noted by experimenters from Gilbert to Franklin and Faraday awaited the invention that could alone render them useful to mankind. The eighteenth century, keenly curious and ceaselessly active in this fascinating field of investigation, had not, after all, left much of a legacy in either principles or appliances. The lodestone and the compass; the frictional machine; the Leyden jar; the nature of conductors and insulators; the identity of electricity and the thunder-storm flash; the use of lightning-rods; the physiological effects of an electrical shock—these constituted the bulk of the bequest to which philosophers were the only heirs. Pregnant with possibilities were many of the observations that had been recorded. But these few appliances made up the meagre kit of tools with which the nineteenth century entered upon its task of acquiring the arts and conveniences now such an intimate part of "human nature's daily food" that the average American to-day pays more for his electrical service than he does for bread.
Even in 1847, few of these things had lost their novelty; most were still in the early stages of development. But when we look at electricity, we can see the vast potential of a whole new realm of discoveries. Maybe the terms "utilization" or "application" fit better than "discovery," because, just like back then, there was an endless array of phenomena recognized by experimenters from Gilbert to Franklin and Faraday that awaited the invention needed to make them useful for humanity. The eighteenth century, highly curious and constantly active in this fascinating area of research, didn't really leave much behind in terms of principles or devices. The lodestone and compass, the friction machine, the Leyden jar, the understanding of conductors and insulators, the connection between electricity and lightning, the use of lightning rods, and the physiological effects of electric shocks—these were the main contributions that philosophers inherited. Many recorded observations were filled with potential, but these few devices made up the limited toolkit with which the nineteenth century began its journey to develop the arts and conveniences that are now such an integral part of "human nature's daily food" that the average American today spends more on electricity than on bread.
With the first year of the new century came Volta's invention of the chemical battery as a means of producing electricity. A well-known Italian picture represents Volta exhibiting his apparatus before the young conqueror Napoleon, then ravishing from the Peninsula its treasure of ancient art and founding an ephemeral empire. At such a moment this gift of despoiled Italy to the world was a noble revenge, setting in motion incalculable beneficent forces and agencies. For the first time man had command of a steady supply of electricity without toil or effort. The useful results obtainable previously from the current of a frictional machine were not much greater than those to be derived from the flight of a rocket. While the frictional appliance is still employed in medicine, it ranks with the flint axe and the tinder-box in industrial obsolescence. No art or trade could be founded on it; no diminution of daily work or increase of daily comfort could be secured with it. But the little battery with its metal plates in a weak solution proved a perennial reservoir of electrical energy, safe and controllable, from which supplies could be drawn at will. That which was wild had become domesticated; regular crops took the place of haphazard gleanings from brake or prairie; the possibility of electrical starvation was forever left behind.
With the first year of the new century came Volta's invention of the chemical battery as a way of generating electricity. A famous Italian painting shows Volta demonstrating his device to the young conqueror Napoleon, who was then taking treasures of ancient art from the Peninsula and establishing a fleeting empire. At that moment, this gift from looted Italy to the world was a noble act of revenge, setting off countless beneficial forces and initiatives. For the first time, humans had access to a steady supply of electricity without hard work or effort. The useful results from a frictional machine's current were hardly greater than those from a rocket's flight. While the frictional device is still used in medicine, it now ranks alongside the flint axe and the tinderbox in terms of industrial obsolescence. No art or trade could be built on it; it offered no reduction in daily labor or increase in comfort. But the small battery with its metal plates in a weak solution proved to be a constant source of electrical energy, safe and controllable, from which supplies could be drawn at will. What was once wild had become domesticated; regular crops replaced random collections from the underbrush or prairie; the threat of electrical deprivation was permanently left behind.
Immediately new processes of inestimable value revealed themselves; new methods were suggested. Almost all the electrical arts now employed made their beginnings in the next twenty-five years, and while the more extensive of them depend to-day on the dynamo for electrical energy, some of the most important still remain in loyal allegiance to the older source. The battery itself soon underwent modifications, and new types were evolved—the storage, the double-fluid, and the dry. Various analogies next pointed to the use of heat, and the thermoelectric cell emerged, embodying the application of flame to the junction of two different metals. Davy, of the safety-lamp, threw a volume of current across the gap between two sticks of charcoal, and the voltaic arc, forerunner of electric lighting, shed its bright beams upon a dazzled world. The decomposition of water by electrolytic action was recognized and made the basis of communicating at a distance even before the days of the electromagnet. The ties that bind electricity and magnetism in twinship of relation and interaction were detected, and Faraday's work in induction gave the world at once the dynamo and the motor. "Hitch your wagon to a star," said Emerson. To all the coal-fields and all the waterfalls Faraday had directly hitched the wheels of industry. Not only was it now possible to convert mechanical energy into electricity cheaply and in illimitable quantities, but electricity at once showed its ubiquitous availability as a motive power. Boats were propelled by it, cars were hauled, and even papers printed. Electroplating became an art, and telegraphy sprang into active being on both sides of the Atlantic.
Immediately, new processes of incredible value emerged; new methods were proposed. Almost all the electrical technologies we use today started developing in the next twenty-five years. While many rely on the dynamo for electrical energy now, some important ones still depend on older sources. The battery itself quickly evolved, leading to new types - storage, double-fluid, and dry batteries. Various comparisons indicated the use of heat, resulting in the creation of the thermoelectric cell, which applied flame to the junction of two different metals. Davy, known for the safety lamp, sent a strong current across a gap between two charcoal sticks, and the voltaic arc—the precursor to electric lighting—cast its bright rays on a captivated world. The breakdown of water through electrolytic action was identified and became the foundation for long-distance communication even before electromagnets existed. The connection between electricity and magnetism, in their mutual relationship and interaction, was discovered, and Faraday's work on induction provided the world with both the dynamo and the motor. "Hitch your wagon to a star," said Emerson. Faraday had effectively connected the wheels of industry to all the coal fields and waterfalls. It became possible to convert mechanical energy into electricity both cheaply and in unlimited quantities, showcasing electricity's versatility as a power source. Boats were powered by it, cars were towed, and even papers were printed. Electroplating emerged as an art, and telegraphy came to life on both sides of the Atlantic.
At the time Edison was born, in 1847, telegraphy, upon which he was to leave so indelible an imprint, had barely struggled into acceptance by the public. In England, Wheatstone and Cooke had introduced a ponderous magnetic needle telegraph. In America, in 1840, Morse had taken out his first patent on an electromagnetic telegraph, the principle of which is dominating in the art to this day. Four years later the memorable message "What hath God wrought!" was sent by young Miss Ellsworth over his circuits, and incredulous Washington was advised by wire of the action of the Democratic Convention in Baltimore in nominating Polk. By 1847 circuits had been strung between Washington and New York, under private enterprise, the Government having declined to buy the Morse system for $100,000. Everything was crude and primitive. The poles were two hundred feet apart and could barely hold up a wash-line. The slim, bare, copper wire snapped on the least provocation, and the circuit was "down" for thirty-six days in the first six months. The little glass-knob insulators made seductive targets for ignorant sportsmen. Attempts to insulate the line wire were limited to coating it with tar or smearing it with wax for the benefit of all the bees in the neighborhood. The farthest western reach of the telegraph lines in 1847 was Pittsburg, with three-ply iron wire mounted on square glass insulators with a little wooden pentroof for protection. In that office, where Andrew Carnegie was a messenger boy, the magnets in use to receive the signals sent with the aid of powerful nitric-acid batteries weighed as much as seventy-five pounds apiece. But the business was fortunately small at the outset, until the new device, patronized chiefly by lottery-men, had proved its utility. Then came the great outburst of activity. Within a score of years telegraph wires covered the whole occupied country with a network, and the first great electrical industry was a pronounced success, yielding to its pioneers the first great harvest of electrical fortunes. It had been a sharp struggle for bare existence, during which such a man as the founder of Cornell University had been glad to get breakfast in New York with a quarter-dollar picked up on Broadway.
At the time Edison was born in 1847, telegraphy, which he would greatly influence, was just starting to gain acceptance among the public. In England, Wheatstone and Cooke had introduced a bulky magnetic needle telegraph. In America, Morse had filed his first patent for an electromagnetic telegraph in 1840, a principle that still dominates today. Four years later, the famous message "What hath God wrought!" was sent by young Miss Ellsworth over his lines, and an astonished Washington learned via wire about the Democratic Convention's nomination of Polk in Baltimore. By 1847, circuits stretched between Washington and New York, built by private companies after the government refused to buy Morse's system for $100,000. Everything was rudimentary and basic. The poles stood two hundred feet apart and could barely support a clothesline. The thin, bare copper wire broke at the slightest touch, and the circuit was "down" for thirty-six days within the first six months. The small glass insulators became tempting targets for careless hunters. Efforts to insulate the wire were limited to coating it with tar or slathering it with wax for the benefit of local bees. The furthest west the telegraph lines reached in 1847 was Pittsburgh, using three-ply iron wire mounted on square glass insulators topped with a little wooden roof for protection. In that office, where Andrew Carnegie worked as a messenger boy, the magnets employed to receive signals from powerful nitric-acid batteries weighed as much as seventy-five pounds each. Fortunately, business was small at first, mostly supported by lottery operators, until the new technology proved its worth. Then a surge of activity followed. Within twenty years, telegraph wires crisscrossed the entire occupied country, establishing the first major electrical industry, which became a significant success and brought substantial wealth to its pioneers. It had been a tough battle for survival, during which the founder of Cornell University was happy to have breakfast in New York with a quarter-dollar he found on Broadway.
CHAPTER II
EDISON'S PEDIGREE
THOMAS ALVA EDISON was born at Milan Ohio, February 11, 1847. The State that rivals Virginia as a "Mother of Presidents" has evidently other titles to distinction of the same nature. For picturesque detail it would not be easy to find any story excelling that of the Edison family before it reached the Western Reserve. The story epitomizes American idealism, restlessness, freedom of individual opinion, and ready adjustment to the surrounding conditions of pioneer life. The ancestral Edisons who came over from Holland, as nearly as can be determined, in 1730, were descendants of extensive millers on the Zuyder Zee, and took up patents of land along the Passaic River, New Jersey, close to the home that Mr. Edison established in the Orange Mountains a hundred and sixty years later. They landed at Elizabethport, New Jersey, and first settled near Caldwell in that State, where some graves of the family may still be found. President Cleveland was born in that quiet hamlet. It is a curious fact that in the Edison family the pronunciation of the name has always been with the long "e" sound, as it would naturally be in the Dutch language. The family prospered and must have enjoyed public confidence, for we find the name of Thomas Edison, as a bank official on Manhattan Island, signed to Continental currency in 1778. According to the family records this Edison, great-grandfather of Thomas Alva, reached the extreme old age of 104 years. But all was not well, and, as has happened so often before, the politics of father and son were violently different. The Loyalist movement that took to Nova Scotia so many Americans after the War of Independence carried with it John, the son of this stalwart Continental. Thus it came about that Samuel Edison, son of John, was born at Digby, Nova Scotia, in 1804. Seven years later John Edison who, as a Loyalist or United Empire emigrant, had become entitled under the laws of Canada to a grant of six hundred acres of land, moved westward to take possession of this property. He made his way through the State of New York in wagons drawn by oxen to the remote and primitive township of Bayfield, in Upper Canada, on Lake Huron. Although the journey occurred in balmy June, it was necessarily attended with difficulty and privation; but the new home was situated in good farming country, and once again this interesting nomadic family settled down.
THOMAS ALVA EDISON was born in Milan, Ohio, on February 11, 1847. The state that competes with Virginia as a "Mother of Presidents" clearly has other noteworthy titles as well. For vivid details, it’s hard to find a story that surpasses that of the Edison family before they made it to the Western Reserve. The tale captures American ideals, restlessness, freedom of thought, and an ability to adapt to the challenges of pioneer life. The ancestral Edisons, who arrived from Holland around 1730, were descendants of successful millers on the Zuyder Zee, and they acquired land along the Passaic River in New Jersey, not far from where Mr. Edison established his home in the Orange Mountains a hundred and sixty years later. They landed in Elizabethport, New Jersey, and initially settled near Caldwell, where some family graves can still be found. President Cleveland was born in that quiet village. Interestingly, in the Edison family, the name has always been pronounced with the long "e" sound, as it naturally would in Dutch. The family thrived and seemed to have earned public trust, as we see the name Thomas Edison signed as a bank official on Manhattan Island to Continental currency in 1778. According to family records, this Edison, Thomas Alva's great-grandfather, lived to be 104 years old. However, not everything was smooth sailing, and as often happens, the father and son's political views were sharply opposed. The Loyalist movement that led many Americans to Nova Scotia after the War of Independence took John, the son of this determined Continental. Consequently, Samuel Edison, son of John, was born in Digby, Nova Scotia, in 1804. Seven years later, John Edison, who had become a Loyalist or United Empire emigrant and was entitled to a grant of six hundred acres of land under Canadian law, moved west to claim this property. He traveled through New York State in ox-drawn wagons to the remote and primitive township of Bayfield in Upper Canada, on Lake Huron. Although the journey took place in pleasant June weather, it was still fraught with challenges and hardships; however, the new home was in a good farming area, and once again, this fascinating nomadic family settled down.
John Edison moved from Bayfield to Vienna, Ontario, on the northern bank of Lake Erie. Mr. Edison supplies an interesting reminiscence of the old man and his environment in those early Canadian days. "When I was five years old I was taken by my father and mother on a visit to Vienna. We were driven by carriage from Milan, Ohio, to a railroad, then to a port on Lake Erie, thence by a canal-boat in a tow of several to Port Burwell, in Canada, across the lake, and from there we drove to Vienna, a short distance away. I remember my grandfather perfectly as he appeared, at 102 years of age, when he died. In the middle of the day he sat under a large tree in front of the house facing a well-travelled road. His head was covered completely with a large quantity of very white hair, and he chewed tobacco incessantly, nodding to friends as they passed by. He used a very large cane, and walked from the chair to the house, resenting any assistance. I viewed him from a distance, and could never get very close to him. I remember some large pipes, and especially a molasses jug, a trunk, and several other things that came from Holland."
John Edison moved from Bayfield to Vienna, Ontario, on the northern shore of Lake Erie. Mr. Edison shares an interesting memory of the old man and his surroundings during those early Canadian days. "When I was five years old, my parents took me to Vienna for a visit. We traveled by carriage from Milan, Ohio, to a railroad, then to a port on Lake Erie, and from there, we took a canal boat to Port Burwell in Canada. After crossing the lake, we drove to Vienna, which was just a short distance away. I remember my grandfather clearly as he was at 102 years old when he passed away. During the day, he would sit under a big tree in front of the house facing a busy road. His head was completely covered with a thick mass of very white hair, and he constantly chewed tobacco, nodding at friends as they passed by. He used a very large cane and walked from his chair to the house, refusing any help. I saw him from a distance and could never get very close. I remember some big pipes, especially a molasses jug, a trunk, and several other things that came from Holland."
John Edison was long-lived, like his father, and reached the ripe old age of 102, leaving his son Samuel charged with the care of the family destinies, but with no great burden of wealth. Little is known of the early manhood of this father of T. A. Edison until we find him keeping a hotel at Vienna, marrying a school-teacher there (Miss Nancy Elliott, in 1828), and taking a lively share in the troublous politics of the time. He was six feet in height, of great bodily vigor, and of such personal dominance of character that he became a captain of the insurgent forces rallying under the banners of Papineau and Mackenzie. The opening years of Queen Victoria's reign witnessed a belated effort in Canada to emphasize the principle that there should not be taxation without representation; and this descendant of those who had left the United States from disapproval of such a doctrine, flung himself headlong into its support.
John Edison lived a long life, like his father, reaching the impressive age of 102, and leaving his son Samuel responsible for the family's future, though not with a significant amount of wealth. Not much is known about the early adulthood of this father of T. A. Edison until we find him running a hotel in Vienna, marrying a schoolteacher named Miss Nancy Elliott in 1828, and actively participating in the turbulent politics of the time. He was six feet tall, physically strong, and had such a commanding presence that he became a captain of the rebel forces rallying under the banners of Papineau and Mackenzie. The early years of Queen Victoria's reign saw a delayed effort in Canada to emphasize the principle that there should be no taxation without representation; and this descendant of those who had left the United States due to disagreement with such a principle threw himself passionately into its support.
It has been said of Earl Durham, who pacified Canada at this time and established the present system of government, that he made a country and marred a career. But the immediate measures of repression enforced before a liberal policy was adopted were sharp and severe, and Samuel Edison also found his own career marred on Canadian soil as one result of the Durham administration. Exile to Bermuda with other insurgents was not so attractive as the perils of a flight to the United States. A very hurried departure was effected in secret from the scene of trouble, and there are romantic traditions of his thrilling journey of one hundred and eighty-two miles toward safety, made almost entirely without food or sleep, through a wild country infested with Indians of unfriendly disposition. Thus was the Edison family repatriated by a picturesque political episode, and the great inventor given a birthplace on American soil, just as was Benjamin Franklin when his father came from England to Boston. Samuel Edison left behind him, however, in Canada, several brothers, all of whom lived to the age of ninety or more, and from whom there are descendants in the region.
It has been said of Earl Durham, who calmed Canada during this time and established the current system of government, that he created a nation but damaged a career. However, the immediate measures of repression enforced before a more progressive policy was adopted were harsh and severe, and Samuel Edison also had his own career disrupted on Canadian soil as a result of the Durham administration. Being exiled to Bermuda with other rebels was not as appealing as the dangers of fleeing to the United States. A hasty departure was made in secret from the troubled area, and there are romantic stories of his thrilling journey of one hundred and eighty-two miles toward safety, undertaken almost entirely without food or sleep, through a wild area inhabited by hostile Native Americans. Thus, the Edison family was brought back to safety through a dramatic political event, and the great inventor was given a birthplace on American soil, just like Benjamin Franklin when his father moved from England to Boston. Samuel Edison did, however, leave behind several brothers in Canada, all of whom lived to be ninety or older, and from whom there are descendants in the area.
After some desultory wanderings for a year or two along the shores of Lake Erie, among the prosperous towns then springing up, the family, with its Canadian home forfeited, and in quest of another resting-place, came to Milan, Ohio, in 1842. That pretty little village offered at the moment many attractions as a possible Chicago. The railroad system of Ohio was still in the future, but the Western Reserve had already become a vast wheat-field, and huge quantities of grain from the central and northern counties sought shipment to Eastern ports. The Huron River, emptying into Lake Erie, was navigable within a few miles of the village, and provided an admirable outlet. Large granaries were established, and proved so successful that local capital was tempted into the project of making a tow-path canal from Lockwood Landing all the way to Milan itself. The quaint old Moravian mission and quondam Indian settlement of one hundred inhabitants found itself of a sudden one of the great grain ports of the world, and bidding fair to rival Russian Odessa. A number of grain warehouses, or primitive elevators, were built along the bank of the canal, and the produce of the region poured in immediately, arriving in wagons drawn by four or six horses with loads of a hundred bushels. No fewer than six hundred wagons came clattering in, and as many as twenty sail vessels were loaded with thirty-five thousand bushels of grain, during a single day. The canal was capable of being navigated by craft of from two hundred to two hundred and fifty tons burden, and the demand for such vessels soon led to the development of a brisk ship-building industry, for which the abundant forests of the region supplied the necessary lumber. An evidence of the activity in this direction is furnished by the fact that six revenue cutters were launched at this port in these brisk days of its prime.
After a few aimless years wandering along the shores of Lake Erie, exploring the thriving towns appearing at the time, the family, having lost their home in Canada and searching for a new place, arrived in Milan, Ohio, in 1842. This charming little village seemed to have many attractions as a potential Chicago. Although Ohio's railroad system was still on the horizon, the Western Reserve had already turned into a vast wheat-field, and large quantities of grain from central and northern counties were being shipped to Eastern ports. The Huron River, flowing into Lake Erie, was navigable just a few miles from the village, providing a great outlet. Large grain storage facilities were established and became so successful that local investors were encouraged to build a tow-path canal from Lockwood Landing all the way to Milan. The quaint old Moravian mission and former Indian settlement with just one hundred residents suddenly became one of the major grain ports in the world, seemingly on track to rival Russian Odessa. Several grain warehouses, or basic elevators, were constructed along the canal banks, and the region's produce quickly started arriving, coming in wagons pulled by four or six horses with loads of a hundred bushels. At least six hundred wagons showed up, and as many as twenty sailing vessels were loaded with thirty-five thousand bushels of grain in just one day. The canal could accommodate boats weighing between two hundred and two hundred and fifty tons, and the demand for such vessels quickly sparked a lively shipbuilding industry, supported by the abundant local forests providing the necessary lumber. A sign of this activity is the fact that six revenue cutters were launched at this port during these energetic prime days.
Samuel Edison, versatile, buoyant of temper, and ever optimistic, would thus appear to have pitched his tent with shrewd judgment. There was plenty of occupation ready to his hand, and more than one enterprise received his attention; but he devoted his energies chiefly to the making of shingles, for which there was a large demand locally and along the lake. Canadian lumber was used principally in this industry. The wood was imported in "bolts" or pieces three feet long. A bolt made two shingles; it was sawn asunder by hand, then split and shaved. None but first-class timber was used, and such shingles outlasted far those made by machinery with their cross-grain cut. A house in Milan, on which some of those shingles were put in 1844, was still in excellent condition forty-two years later. Samuel Edison did well at this occupation, and employed several men, but there were other outlets from time to time for his business activity and speculative disposition.
Samuel Edison, versatile, cheerful, and always optimistic, seemed to have made a smart choice in his endeavors. There was plenty of work available, and he was involved in more than one project, but he focused most of his energy on making shingles, which were in high demand locally and along the lake. Canadian lumber was primarily used in this trade. The wood was brought in "bolts," or pieces three feet long. Each bolt yielded two shingles; it was cut by hand, then split and shaved. Only top-quality timber was used, and those shingles lasted much longer than those made by machines, which had a cross-grain cut. A house in Milan that got some of those shingles in 1844 was still in great shape forty-two years later. Samuel Edison did well in this business and employed several men, but he also explored other opportunities for his entrepreneurial spirit from time to time.
Edison's mother was an attractive and highly educated woman, whose influence upon his disposition and intellect has been profound and lasting. She was born in Chenango County, New York, in 1810, and was the daughter of the Rev. John Elliott, a Baptist minister and descendant of an old Revolutionary soldier, Capt. Ebenezer Elliott, of Scotch descent. The old captain was a fine and picturesque type. He fought all through the long War of Independence—seven years—and then appears to have settled down at Stonington, Connecticut. There, at any rate, he found his wife, "grandmother Elliott," who was Mercy Peckham, daughter of a Scotch Quaker. Then came the residence in New York State, with final removal to Vienna, for the old soldier, while drawing his pension at Buffalo, lived in the little Canadian town, and there died, over 100 years old. The family was evidently one of considerable culture and deep religious feeling, for two of Mrs. Edison's uncles and two brothers were also in the same Baptist ministry. As a young woman she became a teacher in the public high school at Vienna, and thus met her husband, who was residing there. The family never consisted of more than three children, two boys and a girl. A trace of the Canadian environment is seen in the fact that Edison's elder brother was named William Pitt, after the great English statesman. Both his brother and the sister exhibited considerable ability. William Pitt Edison as a youth was so clever with his pencil that it was proposed to send him to Paris as an art student. In later life he was manager of the local street railway lines at Port Huron, Michigan, in which he was heavily interested. He also owned a good farm near that town, and during the ill-health at the close of his life, when compelled to spend much of the time indoors, he devoted himself almost entirely to sketching. It has been noted by intimate observers of Thomas A. Edison that in discussing any project or new idea his first impulse is to take up any piece of paper available and make drawings of it. His voluminous note-books are a mass of sketches. Mrs-Tannie Edison Bailey, the sister, had, on the other hand, a great deal of literary ability, and spent much of her time in writing.
Edison's mother was an attractive and highly educated woman whose influence on his personality and intellect was deep and lasting. She was born in Chenango County, New York, in 1810, and was the daughter of Rev. John Elliott, a Baptist minister and descendant of an old Revolutionary soldier, Capt. Ebenezer Elliott, who was of Scottish descent. The old captain was quite a striking figure. He fought throughout the long War of Independence—seven years—and then seems to have settled down in Stonington, Connecticut. There, at least, he met his wife, "grandmother Elliott," who was Mercy Peckham, the daughter of a Scottish Quaker. Then came their time in New York State, with a final move to Vienna, as the old soldier, while receiving his pension in Buffalo, lived in the little Canadian town and died there, over 100 years old. The family was clearly one of considerable culture and deep religious conviction, as two of Mrs. Edison’s uncles and two of her brothers were also involved in the Baptist ministry. As a young woman, she became a teacher in the public high school in Vienna, where she met her husband, who was living there. The family never had more than three children, two boys and a girl. A hint of their Canadian background can be seen in the fact that Edison's older brother was named William Pitt, after the great English statesman. Both his brother and sister showed a lot of talent. William Pitt Edison was so skilled at drawing in his youth that it was suggested he should be sent to Paris as an art student. Later in life, he managed the local streetcar lines in Port Huron, Michigan, in which he had a significant investment. He also owned a good farm near that town, and during the latter part of his life when he was often unwell and had to stay indoors, he dedicated himself almost entirely to sketching. Observers who were close to Thomas A. Edison noted that when discussing any project or new idea, his first impulse was to grab any available piece of paper and start drawing. His extensive notebooks are filled with sketches. His sister, Mrs. Tannie Edison Bailey, on the other hand, had a great deal of literary talent and spent much of her time writing.
The great inventor, whose iron endurance and stern will have enabled him to wear down all his associates by work sustained through arduous days and sleepless nights, was not at all strong as a child, and was of fragile appearance. He had an abnormally large but well-shaped head, and it is said that the local doctors feared he might have brain trouble. In fact, on account of his assumed delicacy, he was not allowed to go to school for some years, and even when he did attend for a short time the results were not encouraging—his mother being hotly indignant upon hearing that the teacher had spoken of him to an inspector as "addled." The youth was, indeed, fortunate far beyond the ordinary in having a mother at once loving, well-informed, and ambitious, capable herself, from her experience as a teacher, of undertaking and giving him an education better than could be secured in the local schools of the day. Certain it is that under this simple regime studious habits were formed and a taste for literature developed that have lasted to this day. If ever there was a man who tore the heart out of books it is Edison, and what has once been read by him is never forgotten if useful or worthy of submission to the test of experiment.
The great inventor, whose iron will and determination allowed him to push his colleagues through long hours of hard work and sleepless nights, was not very strong as a child and appeared quite fragile. He had an unusually large but well-formed head, and it's said that the local doctors worried he might have brain issues. In fact, due to his perceived frailty, he wasn't allowed to attend school for several years, and even when he did go for a short time, the outcome was discouraging—his mother was furious to hear that the teacher described him to an inspector as "addled." The young man was incredibly fortunate to have a mother who was loving, knowledgeable, and ambitious, and who, with her background as a teacher, was able to provide him with an education that surpassed what was available in the local schools at the time. It's clear that under this straightforward approach, he developed good study habits and a love for literature that have lasted to this day. If anyone truly immersed themselves in books, it was Edison, and what he read is never forgotten if it's useful or worth testing.
But even thus early the stronger love of mechanical processes and of probing natural forces manifested itself. Edison has said that he never saw a statement in any book as to such things that he did not involuntarily challenge, and wish to demonstrate as either right or wrong. As a mere child the busy scenes of the canal and the grain warehouses were of consuming interest, but the work in the ship-building yards had an irresistible fascination. His questions were so ceaseless and innumerable that the penetrating curiosity of an unusually strong mind was regarded as deficiency in powers of comprehension, and the father himself, a man of no mean ingenuity and ability, reports that the child, although capable of reducing him to exhaustion by endless inquiries, was often spoken of as rather wanting in ordinary acumen. This apparent dulness is, however, a quite common incident to youthful genius.
But even at that early age, a strong interest in mechanical processes and exploring natural forces started to show. Edison once said he never came across a statement in any book about these topics without feeling the urge to challenge it and prove whether it was right or wrong. As a young child, he was intensely interested in the busy scenes of the canal and the grain warehouses, but the work in the shipbuilding yards captivated him even more. His questions were so continuous and countless that the intense curiosity of his remarkably sharp mind was often seen as a lack of understanding. Even his father, a man of considerable skill and intelligence, noted that although the child could wear him out with endless questions, he was often considered a bit dull. However, this apparent lack of sharpness is quite a common experience for young geniuses.
The constructive tendencies of this child of whom his father said once that he had never had any boyhood days in the ordinary sense, were early noted in his fondness for building little plank roads out of the debris of the yards and mills. His extraordinarily retentive memory was shown in his easy acquisition of all the songs of the lumber gangs and canal men before he was five years old. One incident tells how he was found one day in the village square copying laboriously the signs of the stores. A highly characteristic event at the age of six is described by his sister. He had noted a goose sitting on her eggs and the result. One day soon after, he was missing. By-and-by, after an anxious search, his father found him sitting in a nest he had made in the barn, filled with goose-eggs and hens' eggs he had collected, trying to hatch them out.
The constructive instincts of this child, about whom his father once said he had never really experienced a typical childhood, were evident early on in his love for building small plank roads from scraps in the yards and mills. His remarkable memory was apparent in how easily he learned all the songs of the lumber workers and canal men before he even turned five. One story describes how he was found one day in the village square, carefully copying the signs of the stores. A particularly telling event at the age of six is recounted by his sister. He had noticed a goose sitting on her eggs and the result. One day soon after, he went missing. After a worried search, his father eventually found him sitting in a nest he had created in the barn, filled with goose eggs and hens' eggs he had gathered, trying to incubate them.
One of Mr. Edison's most vivid recollections goes back to 1850, when as a child three of four years old he saw camped in front of his home six covered wagons, "prairie schooners," and witnessed their departure for California. The great excitement over the gold discoveries was thus felt in Milan, and these wagons, laden with all the worldly possessions of their owners, were watched out of sight on their long journey by this fascinated urchin, whose own discoveries in later years were to tempt many other argonauts into the auriferous realms of electricity.
One of Mr. Edison's most vivid memories goes back to 1850, when he was about three or four years old and saw six covered wagons, "prairie schooners," camped in front of his house. He watched as they left for California. The excitement over the gold discoveries was felt in Milan, and this boy, captivated by the scene, observed the wagons, filled with their owners' belongings, until they disappeared on their long journey. Little did he know that his own future inventions would later entice many others into the promising fields of electricity.
Another vivid memory of this period concerns his first realization of the grim mystery of death. He went off one day with the son of the wealthiest man in the town to bathe in the creek. Soon after they entered the water the other boy disappeared. Young Edison waited around the spot for half an hour or more, and then, as it was growing dark, went home puzzled and lonely, but silent as to the occurrence. About two hours afterward, when the missing boy was being searched for, a man came to the Edison home to make anxious inquiry of the companion with whom he had last been seen. Edison told all the circumstances with a painful sense of being in some way implicated. The creek was at once dragged, and then the body was recovered.
Another vivid memory from this time is his first realization of the harsh reality of death. One day, he went off with the son of the richest man in town to swim in the creek. Shortly after they got in the water, the other boy vanished. Young Edison waited around the spot for more than half an hour, and as it started to get dark, he went home feeling confused and lonely, but he didn't say anything about what had happened. About two hours later, while they were searching for the missing boy, a man came to the Edison house to ask anxiously about the friend he had last been with. Edison recounted all the details, feeling painfully like he was somehow involved. The creek was soon dragged, and then the body was found.
Edison had himself more than one narrow escape. Of course he fell in the canal and was nearly drowned; few boys in Milan worth their salt omitted that performance. On another occasion he encountered a more novel peril by falling into the pile of wheat in a grain elevator and being almost smothered. Holding the end of a skate-strap for another lad to shorten with an axe, he lost the top of a finger. Fire also had its perils. He built a fire in a barn, but the flames spread so rapidly that, although he escaped himself, the barn was wholly destroyed, and he was publicly whipped in the village square as a warning to other youths. Equally well remembered is a dangerous encounter with a ram that attacked him while he was busily engaged digging out a bumblebee's nest near an orchard fence. The animal knocked him against the fence, and was about to butt him again when he managed to drop over on the safe side and escape. He was badly hurt and bruised, and no small quantity of arnica was needed for his wounds.
Edison had more than one close call. Of course, he fell into the canal and nearly drowned; few boys in Milan who were worth their salt skipped that experience. At another time, he faced a different danger by falling into a pile of wheat in a grain elevator and almost suffocating. While holding the end of a skate strap for another kid to shorten with an axe, he lost the tip of a finger. Fire posed its own dangers too. He started a fire in a barn, but the flames spread so quickly that, although he escaped, the barn was completely destroyed, and he was publicly whipped in the village square as a warning to other kids. Equally memorable was a dangerous encounter with a ram that attacked him while he was busy digging out a bumblebee nest near an orchard fence. The ram slammed him against the fence and was about to butt him again when he managed to roll over to the safe side and escape. He was badly hurt and bruised, needing quite a bit of arnica for his wounds.
Meantime little Milan had reached the zenith of its prosperity, and all of a sudden had been deprived of its flourishing grain trade by the new Columbus, Sandusky & Hocking Railroad; in fact, the short canal was one of the last efforts of its kind in this country to compete with the new means of transportation. The bell of the locomotive was everywhere ringing the death-knell of effective water haulage, with such dire results that, in 1880, of the 4468 miles of American freight canal, that had cost $214,000,000, no fewer than 1893 miles had been abandoned, and of the remaining 2575 miles quite a large proportion was not paying expenses. The short Milan canal suffered with the rest, and to-day lies well-nigh obliterated, hidden in part by vegetable gardens, a mere grass-grown depression at the foot of the winding, shallow valley. Other railroads also prevented any further competition by the canal, for a branch of the Wheeling & Lake Erie now passes through the village, while the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern runs a few miles to the south.
Meanwhile, little Milan had reached the peak of its prosperity, but suddenly it lost its thriving grain trade to the new Columbus, Sandusky & Hocking Railroad. In fact, the short canal was one of the last attempts of its kind in the country to compete with the new transportation methods. The sound of the locomotive bell was everywhere signaling the end of effective water transport, with such severe consequences that, in 1880, out of the 4,468 miles of American freight canals, which had cost $214 million, no fewer than 1,893 miles had been abandoned, and a significant portion of the remaining 2,575 miles was not covering costs. The short Milan canal suffered like the rest, and today it is nearly erased, partly concealed by vegetable gardens, a mere grass-covered dip at the foot of the winding, shallow valley. Other railroads also stopped any further competition with the canal, as a branch of the Wheeling & Lake Erie now passes through the village, while the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern runs a few miles to the south.
The owners of the canal soon had occasion to regret that they had disdained the overtures of enterprising railroad promoters desirous of reaching the village, and the consequences of commercial isolation rapidly made themselves felt. It soon became evident to Samuel Edison and his wife that the cozy brick home on the bluff must be given up and the struggle with fortune resumed elsewhere. They were well-to-do, however, and removing, in 1854, to Port Huron, Michigan, occupied a large colonial house standing in the middle of an old Government fort reservation of ten acres overlooking the wide expanse of the St. Clair River just after it leaves Lake Huron. It was in many ways an ideal homestead, toward which the family has always felt the strongest attachment, but the association with Milan has never wholly ceased. The old house in which Edison was born is still occupied (in 1910) by Mr. S. O. Edison, a half-brother of Edison's father, and a man of marked inventive ability. He was once prominent in the iron-furnace industry of Ohio, and was for a time associated in the iron trade with the father of the late President McKinley. Among his inventions may be mentioned a machine for making fuel from wheat straw, and a smoke-consuming device.
The owners of the canal soon regretted turning down the offers from ambitious railroad promoters who wanted to connect with the village, and the effects of being cut off commercially quickly became clear. It became evident to Samuel Edison and his wife that they had to leave their cozy brick home on the bluff and seek their fortunes elsewhere. However, they were well-off, and in 1854, they moved to Port Huron, Michigan, where they lived in a large colonial house located on an old Government fort reservation of ten acres, overlooking the wide expanse of the St. Clair River just after it flows out of Lake Huron. In many ways, it was an ideal home, and the family has always had a strong attachment to it, but their connection to Milan never fully faded. The old house where Edison was born is still occupied (in 1910) by Mr. S. O. Edison, a half-brother of Edison's father and a man of notable inventive talent. He was once a well-known figure in Ohio's iron-furnace industry and was associated with the iron trade alongside the father of the late President McKinley for a time. Some of his inventions include a machine for producing fuel from wheat straw and a smoke-consuming device.
This birthplace of Edison remains the plain, substantial little brick house it was originally: one-storied, with rooms finished on the attic floor. Being built on the hillside, its basement opens into the rear yard. It was at first heated by means of open coal grates, which may not have been altogether adequate in severe winters, owing to the altitude and the north-eastern exposure, but a large furnace is one of the more modern changes. Milan itself is not materially unlike the smaller Ohio towns of its own time or those of later creation, but the venerable appearance of the big elm-trees that fringe the trim lawns tells of its age. It is, indeed, an extremely neat, snug little place, with well-kept homes, mostly of frame construction, and flagged streets crossing each other at right angles. There are no poor—at least, everybody is apparently well-to-do. While a leisurely atmosphere pervades the town, few idlers are seen. Some of the residents are engaged in local business; some are occupied in farming and grape culture; others are employed in the iron-works near-by, at Norwalk. The stores and places of public resort are gathered about the square, where there is plenty of room for hitching when the Saturday trading is done at that point, at which periods the fitful bustle recalls the old wheat days when young Edison ran with curiosity among the six and eight horse teams that had brought in grain. This square is still covered with fine primeval forest trees, and has at its centre a handsome soldiers' monument of the Civil War, to which four paved walks converge. It is an altogether pleasant and unpretentious town, which cherishes with no small amount of pride its association with the name of Thomas Alva Edison.
This birthplace of Edison is still the plain, sturdy little brick house it was originally: one story, with rooms finished in the attic. Since it’s built on a hillside, the basement opens up to the backyard. It was initially heated by open coal grates, which might not have been enough during harsh winters due to the elevation and northeastern exposure, but a large furnace is one of the more modern upgrades. Milan itself isn’t much different from smaller Ohio towns of its time or those that came later, but the old elm trees lining the well-kept lawns speak to its age. It is, in fact, a very neat, cozy little place, with well-maintained homes, mostly made of wood, and paved streets intersecting at right angles. There are no poor people—at least, everyone seems to be doing well. While the town has a relaxed vibe, there aren’t many idle folks around. Some residents are involved in local businesses; some work in farming and grape cultivation; others are employed at the nearby ironworks in Norwalk. The shops and public gathering places are centered around the square, which has plenty of space for hitching up horses after Saturday trading, a time that brings back memories of the old wheat days when young Edison ran around curiously among the six-to-eight-horse teams delivering grain. This square still boasts beautiful old forest trees and features a handsome monument to Civil War soldiers at its center, where four paved paths meet. It’s an altogether pleasant and humble town that takes pride in its association with the name Thomas Alva Edison.
In view of Edison's Dutch descent, it is rather singular to find him with the name of Alva, for the Spanish Duke of Alva was notoriously the worst tyrant ever known to the Low Countries, and his evil deeds occupy many stirring pages in Motley's famous history. As a matter of fact, Edison was named after Capt. Alva Bradley, an old friend of his father, and a celebrated ship-owner on the Lakes. Captain Bradley died a few years ago in wealth, while his old associate, with equal ability for making money, was never able long to keep it (differing again from the Revolutionary New York banker from whom his son's other name, "Thomas," was taken).
Given Edison's Dutch background, it's quite unusual for him to have the name Alva, since the Spanish Duke of Alva was known as the worst tyrant in the Low Countries, and his terrible actions fill many dramatic pages in Motley's well-known history. In fact, Edison was named after Capt. Alva Bradley, an old friend of his father, who was a well-known ship owner on the Great Lakes. Captain Bradley passed away a few years ago wealthy, while his former associate, who was just as skilled at making money, could never hold onto it for long (unlike the Revolutionary New York banker after whom his son's other name, "Thomas," was derived).
CHAPTER III
BOYHOOD AT PORT HURON, MICHIGAN
THE new home found by the Edison family at Port Huron, where Alva spent his brief boyhood before he became a telegraph operator and roamed the whole middle West of that period, was unfortunately destroyed by fire just after the close of the Civil War. A smaller but perhaps more comfortable home was then built by Edison's father on some property he had bought at the near-by village of Gratiot, and there his mother spent the remainder of her life in confirmed invalidism, dying in 1871. Hence the pictures and postal cards sold largely to souvenir-hunters as the Port Huron home do not actually show that in or around which the events now referred to took place.
The new home found by the Edison family in Port Huron, where Alva spent his short childhood before becoming a telegraph operator and traveling across the Midwest, was unfortunately destroyed by fire just after the Civil War. Edison's father then built a smaller but maybe more comfortable home on some property he bought in the nearby village of Gratiot, where his mother lived the rest of her life as a confirmed invalid, passing away in 1871. Therefore, the pictures and postcards mainly sold to souvenir-hunters as the Port Huron home do not actually show the place where the events currently being discussed took place.
It has been a romance of popular biographers, based upon the fact that Edison began his career as a newsboy, to assume that these earlier years were spent in poverty and privation, as indeed they usually are by the "newsies" who swarm and shout their papers in our large cities. While it seems a pity to destroy this erroneous idea, suggestive of a heroic climb from the depths to the heights, nothing could be further from the truth. Socially the Edison family stood high in Port Huron at a time when there was relatively more wealth and general activity than to-day. The town in its pristine prime was a great lumber centre, and hummed with the industry of numerous sawmills. An incredible quantity of lumber was made there yearly until the forests near-by vanished and the industry with them. The wealth of the community, invested largely in this business and in allied transportation companies, was accumulated rapidly and as freely spent during those days of prosperity in St. Clair County, bringing with it a high standard of domestic comfort. In all this the Edisons shared on equal terms.
It has been a popular story among biographers that since Edison started his career as a newsboy, his early years were filled with poverty and hardship, similar to the "newsies" who hustle and shout their papers in big cities. While it seems unfortunate to challenge this mistaken idea, which hints at a heroic rise from the depths to the heights, the reality is quite different. Socially, the Edison family was well-regarded in Port Huron during a time when there was significantly more wealth and activity compared to today. The town, in its early days, was a major lumber center, buzzing with the operations of numerous sawmills. A massive amount of lumber was produced there each year until the nearby forests were depleted, and the industry faded away. The community's wealth, largely invested in this business and related transportation companies, was quickly accumulated and generously spent during those prosperous days in St. Clair County, resulting in a high standard of domestic comfort. The Edisons enjoyed all of this on equal footing.
Thus, contrary to the stories that have been so widely published, the Edisons, while not rich by any means, were in comfortable circumstances, with a well-stocked farm and large orchard to draw upon also for sustenance. Samuel Edison, on moving to Port Huron, became a dealer in grain and feed, and gave attention to that business for many years. But he was also active in the lumber industry in the Saginaw district and several other things. It was difficult for a man of such mercurial, restless temperament to stay constant to any one occupation; in fact, had he been less visionary he would have been more prosperous, but might not have had a son so gifted with insight and imagination. One instance of the optimistic vagaries which led him incessantly to spend time and money on projects that would not have appealed to a man less sanguine was the construction on his property of a wooden observation tower over a hundred feet high, the top of which was reached toilsomely by winding stairs, after the payment of twenty-five cents. It is true that the tower commanded a pretty view by land and water, but Colonel Sellers himself might have projected this enterprise as a possible source of steady income. At first few visitors panted up the long flights of steps to the breezy platform. During the first two months Edison's father took in three dollars, and felt extremely blue over the prospect, and to young Edison and his relatives were left the lonely pleasures of the lookout and the enjoyment of the telescope with which it was equipped. But one fine day there came an excursion from an inland town to see the lake. They picnicked in the grove, and six hundred of them went up the tower. After that the railroad company began to advertise these excursions, and the receipts each year paid for the observatory.
So, contrary to the widely circulated stories, the Edisons, while not wealthy, were doing comfortably well, with a well-stocked farm and a large orchard for their needs. Samuel Edison, upon moving to Port Huron, became a dealer in grain and feed, a business he focused on for many years. However, he was also involved in the lumber industry in the Saginaw area and pursued several other ventures. It was tough for someone with such a restless and changeable nature to stick with any single job; in fact, if he had been less of a dreamer, he might have been more successful, but he probably wouldn't have had a son as insightful and imaginative as Thomas. One example of his optimistic tendencies, which often led him to invest time and money into projects that would seem unappealing to someone less hopeful, was the construction of a wooden observation tower over a hundred feet tall on his property, which visitors could climb after paying twenty-five cents. While the tower did offer a nice view of the land and water, one could imagine Colonel Sellers taking on such a project as a potential way to earn a steady income. Initially, very few visitors made the trek up the long stairs to the breezy platform. In the first two months, Edison's father earned just three dollars, which left him feeling quite gloomy about the future; young Edison and his family were left to enjoy the lookout and the telescope that came with it in solitude. But then one lovely day, an excursion group from a nearby town came to see the lake. They had a picnic in the grove, and six hundred of them climbed the tower. After that, the railroad company started promoting these excursions, and the annual earnings covered the costs of the observatory.
It might be thought that, immersed in business and preoccupied with schemes of this character, Mr. Edison was to blame for the neglect of his son's education. But that was not the case. The conditions were peculiar. It was at the Port Huron public school that Edison received all the regular scholastic instruction he ever enjoyed—just three months. He might have spent the full term there, but, as already noted, his teacher had found him "addled." He was always, according to his own recollection, at the foot of the class, and had come almost to regard himself as a dunce, while his father entertained vague anxieties as to his stupidity. The truth of the matter seems to be that Mrs. Edison, a teacher of uncommon ability and force, held no very high opinion of the average public-school methods and results, and was both eager to undertake the instruction of her son and ambitious for the future of a boy whom she knew from pedagogic experience to be receptive and thoughtful to a very unusual degree. With her he found study easy and pleasant. The quality of culture in that simple but refined home, as well as the intellectual character of this youth without schooling, may be inferred from the fact that before he had reached the age of twelve he had read, with his mother's help, Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Hume's History of England, Sears' History of the World, Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy, and the Dictionary of Sciences; and had even attempted to struggle through Newton's Principia, whose mathematics were decidedly beyond both teacher and student. Besides, Edison, like Faraday, was never a mathematician, and has had little personal use for arithmetic beyond that which is called "mental." He said once to a friend: "I can always hire some mathematicians, but they can't hire me." His father, by-the-way, always encouraged these literary tastes, and paid him a small sum for each new book mastered. It will be noted that fiction makes no showing in the list; but it was not altogether excluded from the home library, and Edison has all his life enjoyed it, particularly the works of such writers as Victor Hugo, after whom, because of his enthusiastic admiration—possibly also because of his imagination—he was nicknamed by his fellow-operators, "Victor Hugo Edison."
It might be assumed that Mr. Edison, busy with business and focused on projects like these, was to blame for neglecting his son’s education. But that’s not true. The situation was unique. Edison got all the formal schooling he ever had at Port Huron public school, which was just three months. He could have spent the entire term there, but his teacher had already decided he was “addled.” According to his own memory, he was always at the bottom of the class and had nearly come to see himself as a dunce, while his father had vague worries about his intelligence. The reality is that Mrs. Edison, a highly skilled and strong teacher, didn’t think much of the average public-school methods and outcomes. She was eager to teach her son and had high hopes for a boy she knew, from her teaching experience, to be unusually receptive and thoughtful. With her, he found studying easy and enjoyable. The quality of education in that simple yet refined home, as well as the intellectual nature of this unschooled youth, can be seen in the fact that by the time he turned twelve, he had read, with his mother’s help, Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Hume’s History of England, Sears' History of the World, Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy, and the Dictionary of Sciences; and had even tried to tackle Newton’s Principia, whose mathematics was certainly beyond both teacher and student. Moreover, Edison, like Faraday, was never a mathematician and had little use for math beyond what is considered “mental.” He once told a friend, “I can always hire some mathematicians, but they can’t hire me.” His father, by the way, always supported these literary interests and paid him a small amount for every new book he finished. It’s important to note that fiction isn’t represented in the list, but it wasn’t entirely left out of the home library, and Edison enjoyed it throughout his life, especially the works of writers like Victor Hugo, after whom, due to his enthusiastic admiration—possibly also his imagination—his fellow workers nicknamed him “Victor Hugo Edison.”
Electricity at that moment could have no allure for a youthful mind. Crude telegraphy represented what was known of it practically, and about that the books read by young Edison were not redundantly informational. Even had that not been so, the inclinations of the boy barely ten years old were toward chemistry, and fifty years later there is seen no change of predilection. It sounds like heresy to say that Edison became an electrician by chance, but it is the sober fact that to this pre-eminent and brilliant leader in electrical achievement escape into the chemical domain still has the aspect of a delightful truant holiday. One of the earliest stories about his boyhood relates to the incident when he induced a lad employed in the family to swallow a large quantity of Seidlitz powders in the belief that the gases generated would enable him to fly. The agonies of the victim attracted attention, and Edison's mother marked her displeasure by an application of the switch kept behind the old Seth Thomas "grandfather clock." The disastrous result of this experiment did not discourage Edison at all, as he attributed failure to the lad rather than to the motive power. In the cellar of the Edison homestead young Alva soon accumulated a chemical outfit, constituting the first in a long series of laboratories. The word "laboratory" had always been associated with alchemists in the past, but as with "filament" this untutored stripling applied an iconoclastic practicability to it long before he realized the significance of the new departure. Goethe, in his legend of Faust, shows the traditional or conventional philosopher in his laboratory, an aged, tottering, gray-bearded investigator, who only becomes youthful upon diabolical intervention, and would stay senile without it. In the Edison laboratory no such weird transformation has been necessary, for the philosopher had youth, fiery energy, and a grimly practical determination that would submit to no denial of the goal of something of real benefit to mankind. Edison and Faust are indeed the extremes of philosophic thought and accomplishment.
At that moment, electricity had no appeal for a young mind. Basic telegraphy was what people understood about it practically, and the books young Edison read didn’t provide much useful information. Even if that weren’t the case, the interests of the boy, barely ten years old, leaned more toward chemistry, and fifty years later, there was still no change in that preference. It may sound radical to say that Edison became an electrician by chance, but the truth is that for this outstanding and brilliant leader in electrical innovation, a foray into chemistry still felt like a fun little escapade. One of the earliest stories from his childhood involves an incident where he convinced a kid working for the family to swallow a large amount of Seidlitz powders, believing that the generated gases would allow him to fly. The victim's agony drew attention, and Edison's mother expressed her disapproval by using the switch kept behind the old Seth Thomas "grandfather clock." This unfortunate outcome didn’t deter Edison at all; he just blamed the failure on the boy rather than the method. In the cellar of the Edison home, young Alva soon gathered a chemistry set, marking the beginning of a long series of laboratories. The term "laboratory" had previously been associated with alchemists, but this untrained young boy applied a practical twist to it long before he understood the significance of this new approach. Goethe, in his legend of Faust, depicts the traditional philosopher in his lab—a frail, gray-bearded researcher who only becomes youthful through a diabolical intervention, remaining senile without it. In Edison's lab, no such strange transformation was necessary, for the philosopher was already youthful, full of fiery energy, and possessed a grimly practical determination that wouldn’t accept anything less than achieving something truly beneficial for humanity. Edison and Faust represent the extremes of philosophical thought and achievement.
The home at Port Huron thus saw the first Edison laboratory. The boy began experimenting when he was about ten or eleven years of age. He got a copy of Parker's School Philosophy, an elementary book on physics, and about every experiment in it he tried. Young Alva, or "Al," as he was called, thus early displayed his great passion for chemistry, and in the cellar of the house he collected no fewer than two hundred bottles, gleaned in baskets from all parts of the town. These were arranged carefully on shelves and all labelled "Poison," so that no one else would handle or disturb them. They contained the chemicals with which he was constantly experimenting. To others this diversion was both mysterious and meaningless, but he had soon become familiar with all the chemicals obtainable at the local drug stores, and had tested to his satisfaction many of the statements encountered in his scientific reading. Edison has said that sometimes he has wondered how it was he did not become an analytical chemist instead of concentrating on electricity, for which he had at first no great inclination.
The home in Port Huron was where Edison set up his first laboratory. He started experimenting when he was about ten or eleven years old. He got a copy of Parker's School Philosophy, an introductory book on physics, and tried almost every experiment in it. Young Alva, or "Al" as he was called, quickly showed his strong interest in chemistry; in the cellar of the house, he collected at least two hundred bottles, gathered in baskets from all over town. He arranged these carefully on shelves and labeled them all "Poison," so nobody else would handle or disturb them. They contained the chemicals he was constantly experimenting with. To others, this hobby seemed both mysterious and pointless, but he quickly became familiar with all the chemicals available at local pharmacies and had verified many of the claims he read about in his scientific studies. Edison later said he sometimes wondered why he didn't become an analytical chemist instead of focusing on electricity, which initially didn't interest him much.
Deprived of the use of a large part of her cellar, tiring of the "mess" always to be found there, and somewhat fearful of results, his mother once told the boy to clear everything out and restore order. The thought of losing all his possessions was the cause of so much ardent distress that his mother relented, but insisted that he must get a lock and key, and keep the embryonic laboratory closed up all the time except when he was there. This was done. From such work came an early familiarity with the nature of electrical batteries and the production of current from them. Apparently the greater part of his spare time was spent in the cellar, for he did not share to any extent in the sports of the boys of the neighborhood, his chum and chief companion, Michael Oates, being a lad of Dutch origin, many years older, who did chores around the house, and who could be recruited as a general utility Friday for the experiments of this young explorer—such as that with the Seidlitz powders.
Unable to use a large part of her cellar, frustrated by the constant "mess" there, and a bit worried about the consequences, his mother told the boy to clean it all out and bring some order back. The idea of losing all his belongings caused him so much distress that his mother changed her mind but insisted he get a lock and key to keep his makeshift laboratory shut except when he was using it. He did just that. From this work, he gained an early understanding of electrical batteries and how to generate current from them. Most of his free time was spent in the cellar since he didn't really take part in the local boys' sports. His close friend and main companion, Michael Oates, older and of Dutch descent, spent time doing chores around the house and could be counted on as a general assistant for this young experimenter—especially for projects like those with Seidlitz powders.
Such pursuits as these consumed the scant pocket-money of the boy very rapidly. He was not in regular attendance at school, and had read all the books within reach. It was thus he turned newsboy, overcoming the reluctance of his parents, particularly that of his mother, by pointing out that he could by this means earn all he wanted for his experiments and get fresh reading in the shape of papers and magazines free of charge. Besides, his leisure hours in Detroit he would be able to spend at the public library. He applied (in 1859) for the privilege of selling newspapers on the trains of the Grand Trunk Railroad, between Port Huron and Detroit, and obtained the concession after a short delay, during which he made an essay in his task of selling newspapers.
Such activities quickly ate up the little pocket money the boy had. He wasn't regularly going to school and had read all the books he could find. That’s how he became a newsboy, convincing his parents, especially his mom, that he could earn enough for his experiments and get free newspapers and magazines to read. Plus, during his free time in Detroit, he could spend hours at the public library. He applied (in 1859) for the chance to sell newspapers on the trains of the Grand Trunk Railroad, between Port Huron and Detroit, and got the go-ahead after a short wait, during which he started practicing his newspaper-selling skills.
Edison had, as a fact, already had some commercial experience from the age of eleven. The ten acres of the reservation offered an excellent opportunity for truck-farming, and the versatile head of the family could not avoid trying his luck in this branch of work. A large "market garden" was laid out, in which Edison worked pretty steadily with the help of the Dutch boy, Michael Oates—he of the flying experiment. These boys had a horse and small wagon intrusted to them, and every morning in the season they would load up with onions, lettuce, peas, etc., and go through the town.
Edison had actually gained some commercial experience by the age of eleven. The ten acres of the reservation provided a great opportunity for truck farming, and the resourceful head of the family couldn't resist trying his luck in this area. A large "market garden" was set up, where Edison worked fairly regularly with the help of the Dutch boy, Michael Oates—who was involved in the flying experiment. These boys had a horse and small wagon assigned to them, and every morning during the season, they would load up with onions, lettuce, peas, and more, then head into town.
As much as $600 was turned over to Mrs. Edison in one year from this source. The boy was indefatigable but not altogether charmed with agriculture. "After a while I tired of this work, as hoeing corn in a hot sun is unattractive, and I did not wonder that it had built up cities. Soon the Grand Trunk Railroad was extended from Toronto to Port Huron, at the foot of Lake Huron, and thence to Detroit, at about the same time the War of the Rebellion broke out. By a great amount of persistence I got permission from my mother to go on the local train as a newsboy. The local train from Port Huron to Detroit, a distance of sixty-three miles, left at 7 A.M. and arrived again at 9.30 P.M. After being on the train for several months, I started two stores in Port Huron—one for periodicals, and the other for vegetables, butter, and berries in the season. These were attended by two boys who shared in the profits. The periodical store I soon closed, as the boy in charge could not be trusted. The vegetable store I kept up for nearly a year. After the railroad had been opened a short time, they put on an express which left Detroit in the morning and returned in the evening. I received permission to put a newsboy on this train. Connected with this train was a car, one part for baggage and the other part for U. S. mail, but for a long time it was not used. Every morning I had two large baskets of vegetables from the Detroit market loaded in the mail-car and sent to Port Huron, where the boy would take them to the store. They were much better than those grown locally, and sold readily. I never was asked to pay freight, and to this day cannot explain why, except that I was so small and industrious, and the nerve to appropriate a U. S. mail-car to do a free freight business was so monumental. However, I kept this up for a long time, and in addition bought butter from the farmers along the line, and an immense amount of blackberries in the season. I bought wholesale and at a low price, and permitted the wives of the engineers and trainmen to have the benefit of the discount. After a while there was a daily immigrant train put on. This train generally had from seven to ten coaches filled always with Norwegians, all bound for Iowa and Minnesota. On these trains I employed a boy who sold bread, tobacco, and stick candy. As the war progressed the daily newspaper sales became very profitable, and I gave up the vegetable store."
As much as $600 was handed over to Mrs. Edison in one year from this source. The boy was tireless but not entirely enthusiastic about farming. "After a while, I got tired of this work, since hoeing corn in the hot sun isn’t appealing, and I could see why it built up cities. Soon, the Grand Trunk Railroad was extended from Toronto to Port Huron, at the foot of Lake Huron, and then to Detroit, around the same time the Civil War started. With a lot of persistence, I got permission from my mom to work on the local train as a newsboy. The local train from Port Huron to Detroit, a distance of sixty-three miles, left at 7 A.M. and got back by 9:30 P.M. After riding on the train for several months, I opened two stores in Port Huron—one for magazines and the other for vegetables, butter, and berries when they were in season. Two boys helped run these stores and split the profits. I soon closed the magazine store because the boy in charge couldn’t be trusted. I ran the vegetable store for nearly a year. After the railroad opened for a short time, they started an express train that left Detroit in the morning and returned in the evening. I got permission to have a newsboy on this train. This train included a car—one part for baggage and the other for U.S. mail—but it wasn’t used for a long time. Every morning, I had two large baskets of vegetables from the Detroit market loaded into the mail car and sent to Port Huron, where the boy would take them to the store. They were much better than the locally grown ones and sold easily. I was never asked to pay for freight, and to this day I can't explain why, except that I was so small and hardworking, and it took a lot of nerve to use a U.S. mail car for free freight. Nevertheless, I kept this up for quite a while, and on top of that, I bought butter from farmers along the line and a huge amount of blackberries when they were in season. I bought in bulk at a low price and allowed the wives of the engineers and trainmen to benefit from the discounts. Eventually, a daily immigrant train was added. This train usually had seven to ten coaches filled with Norwegians, all heading for Iowa and Minnesota. On these trains, I employed a boy who sold bread, tobacco, and stick candy. As the war progressed, selling newspapers became very profitable, and I decided to close the vegetable store."
The hours of this occupation were long, but the work was not particularly heavy, and Edison soon found opportunity for his favorite avocation—chemical experimentation. His train left Port Huron at 7 A.M., and made its southward trip to Detroit in about three hours. This gave a stay in that city from 10 A.M. until the late afternoon, when the train left, arriving at Port Huron about 9.30 P.M. The train was made up of three coaches—baggage, smoking, and ordinary passenger or "ladies." The baggage-car was divided into three compartments—one for trunks and packages, one for the mail, and one for smoking. In those days no use was made of the smoking-compartment, as there was no ventilation, and it was turned over to young Edison, who not only kept papers there and his stock of goods as a "candy butcher," but soon had it equipped with an extraordinary variety of apparatus. There was plenty of leisure on the two daily runs, even for an industrious boy, and thus he found time to transfer his laboratory from the cellar and re-establish it on the train.
The hours of this job were long, but the work wasn't particularly tough, and Edison quickly found time for his favorite hobby—chemical experimentation. His train left Port Huron at 7 A.M. and made the trip south to Detroit in about three hours. This allowed him to spend time in the city from 10 A.M. until the late afternoon when the train left, arriving back in Port Huron around 9:30 P.M. The train consisted of three coaches—baggage, smoking, and regular passenger or "ladies." The baggage car was divided into three sections—one for trunks and packages, one for the mail, and one for smoking. At that time, the smoking compartment wasn't used because there was no ventilation, so it was given to young Edison, who not only stored papers and his stock of goods as a "candy butcher" there but also turned it into a space filled with a remarkable variety of equipment. There was plenty of downtime on the two daily runs, even for a hard-working boy, so he managed to move his laboratory from the basement and set it up on the train.
His earnings were also excellent—so good, in fact, that eight or ten dollars a day were often taken in, and one dollar went every day to his mother. Thus supporting himself, he felt entitled to spend any other profit left over on chemicals and apparatus. And spent it was, for with access to Detroit and its large stores, where he bought his supplies, and to the public library, where he could quench his thirst for technical information, Edison gave up all his spare time and money to chemistry. Surely the country could have presented at that moment no more striking example of the passionate pursuit of knowledge under difficulties than this newsboy, barely fourteen years of age, with his jars and test-tubes installed on a railway baggage-car.
His earnings were also great—so good, in fact, that he often made eight to ten dollars a day, and he sent one dollar to his mother each day. By supporting himself like this, he felt justified in spending any extra money he had on chemicals and equipment. And he did spend it, because with access to Detroit and its large stores where he bought his supplies, and the public library where he could satisfy his thirst for technical knowledge, Edison dedicated all his spare time and money to chemistry. At that moment, the country couldn’t have offered a more striking example of the passionate pursuit of knowledge under difficult circumstances than this newsboy, barely fourteen years old, with his jars and test tubes set up on a railway baggage car.
Nor did this amazing equipment stop at batteries and bottles. The same little space a few feet square was soon converted by this precocious youth into a newspaper office. The outbreak of the Civil War gave a great stimulus to the demand for all newspapers, noticing which he became ambitious to publish a local journal of his own, devoted to the news of that section of the Grand Trunk road. A small printing-press that had been used for hotel bills of fare was picked up in Detroit, and type was also bought, some of it being placed on the train so that composition could go on in spells of leisure. To one so mechanical in his tastes as Edison, it was quite easy to learn the rudiments of the printing art, and thus the Weekly Herald came into existence, of which he was compositor, pressman, editor, publisher, and newsdealer. Only one or two copies of this journal are now discoverable, but its appearance can be judged from the reduced facsimile here shown. The thing was indeed well done as the work of a youth shown by the date to be less than fifteen years old. The literary style is good, there are only a few trivial slips in spelling, and the appreciation is keen of what would be interesting news and gossip. The price was three cents a copy, or eight cents a month for regular subscribers, and the circulation ran up to over four hundred copies an issue. This was by no means the result of mere public curiosity, but attested the value of the sheet as a genuine newspaper, to which many persons in the railroad service along the line were willing contributors. Indeed, with the aid of the railway telegraph, Edison was often able to print late news of importance, of local origin, that the distant regular papers like those of Detroit, which he handled as a newsboy, could not get. It is no wonder that this clever little sheet received the approval and patronage of the English engineer Stephenson when inspecting the Grand Trunk system, and was noted by no less distinguished a contemporary than the London Times as the first newspaper in the world to be printed on a train in motion. The youthful proprietor sometimes cleared as much as twenty to thirty dollars a month from this unique journalistic enterprise.
Nor did this incredible equipment stop at batteries and bottles. The same little area just a few feet square was soon turned by this ambitious young man into a newspaper office. The start of the Civil War created a huge demand for newspapers, and noticing this, he became eager to publish a local journal of his own, focusing on news from that part of the Grand Trunk road. He picked up a small printing press that had been used for hotel menus in Detroit, and he also bought type, some of which was placed on the train so he could work on it during free time. For someone as mechanically inclined as Edison, learning the basics of printing was relatively easy, and thus the Weekly Herald was born, with him serving as compositor, pressman, editor, publisher, and news dealer. Only one or two copies of this journal are now found, but its appearance can be estimated from the reduced facsimile shown here. It was indeed well done for a youth who was under fifteen years old at the time. The writing style is good, there are only a few minor spelling mistakes, and he had a sharp understanding of what would be interesting news and gossip. The price was three cents per copy, or eight cents a month for regular subscribers, and the circulation reached over four hundred copies per issue. This was not just due to public curiosity, but showed the value of the paper as a genuine newspaper, with many people in the railroad industry along the route contributing. In fact, thanks to the railway telegraph, Edison was often able to print late-breaking local news that the distant regular papers, like those in Detroit that he sold as a newsboy, couldn’t get in time. It’s no surprise that this clever little publication received praise and support from the English engineer Stephenson during his inspection of the Grand Trunk system, and it was recognized by none other than the London Times as the first newspaper in the world to be printed on a moving train. The young owner sometimes earned as much as twenty to thirty dollars a month from this unique journalistic venture.
But all this extra work required attention, and Edison solved the difficulty of attending also to the newsboy business by the employment of a young friend, whom he trained and treated liberally as an understudy. There was often plenty of work for both in the early days of the war, when the news of battle caused intense excitement and large sales of papers. Edison, with native shrewdness already so strikingly displayed, would telegraph the station agents and get them to bulletin the event of the day at the front, so that when each station was reached there were eager purchasers waiting. He recalls in particular the sensation caused by the great battle of Shiloh, or Pittsburg Landing, in April, 1862, in which both Grant and Sherman were engaged, in which Johnston died, and in which there was a ghastly total of 25,000 killed and wounded.
But all this extra work needed attention, and Edison managed the challenge of also running the newsboy business by hiring a young friend, whom he trained and treated generously as a backup. There was often plenty of work for both of them in the early days of the war when news of battles created intense excitement and led to large paper sales. Edison, showing his natural cleverness, would telegraph the station agents and have them post updates about the day's events at the front, so that when each station was reached, eager buyers were waiting. He especially remembers the buzz created by the significant battle of Shiloh, or Pittsburg Landing, in April 1862, where both Grant and Sherman fought, Johnston was killed, and there was a horrific total of 25,000 casualties.
In describing his enterprising action that day, Edison says that when he reached Detroit the bulletin-boards of the newspaper offices were surrounded with dense crowds, which read awestricken the news that there were 60,000 killed and wounded, and that the result was uncertain. "I knew that if the same excitement was attained at the various small towns along the road, and especially at Port Huron, the sale of papers would be great. I then conceived the idea of telegraphing the news ahead, went to the operator in the depot, and by giving him Harper's Weekly and some other papers for three months, he agreed to telegraph to all the stations the matter on the bulletin-board. I hurriedly copied it, and he sent it, requesting the agents to display it on the blackboards used for stating the arrival and departure of trains. I decided that instead of the usual one hundred papers I could sell one thousand; but not having sufficient money to purchase that number, I determined in my desperation to see the editor himself and get credit. The great paper at that time was the Detroit Free Press. I walked into the office marked 'Editorial' and told a young man that I wanted to see the editor on important business—important to me, anyway, I was taken into an office where there were two men, and I stated what I had done about telegraphing, and that I wanted a thousand papers, but only had money for three hundred, and I wanted credit. One of the men refused it, but the other told the first spokesman to let me have them. This man, I afterward learned, was Wilbur F. Storey, who subsequently founded the Chicago Times, and became celebrated in the newspaper world. By the aid of another boy I lugged the papers to the train and started folding them. The first station, called Utica, was a small one where I generally sold two papers. I saw a crowd ahead on the platform, and thought it some excursion, but the moment I landed there was a rush for me; then I realized that the telegraph was a great invention. I sold thirty-five papers there. The next station was Mount Clemens, now a watering-place, but then a town of about one thousand. I usually sold six to eight papers there. I decided that if I found a corresponding crowd there, the only thing to do to correct my lack of judgment in not getting more papers was to raise the price from five cents to ten. The crowd was there, and I raised the price. At the various towns there were corresponding crowds. It had been my practice at Port Huron to jump from the train at a point about one-fourth of a mile from the station, where the train generally slackened speed. I had drawn several loads of sand to this point to jump on, and had become quite expert. The little Dutch boy with the horse met me at this point. When the wagon approached the outskirts of the town I was met by a large crowd. I then yelled: 'Twenty-five cents apiece, gentlemen! I haven't enough to go around!' I sold all out, and made what to me then was an immense sum of money."
In recounting his bold actions that day, Edison explains that when he arrived in Detroit, the bulletin boards outside the newspaper offices were packed with crowds reading in shock the news that there were 60,000 killed and wounded, with the outcome still uncertain. "I realized that if the same level of excitement spread to the various small towns along the route, especially Port Huron, the paper sales would be huge. I then came up with the idea of telegraphing the news ahead. I went to the operator at the depot and offered him Harper's Weekly and some other papers for three months, and he agreed to telegraph the bulletin to all the stations. I quickly copied the message, and he sent it while asking the agents to post it on the blackboards used for train schedules. I figured that instead of the usual hundred papers, I could sell a thousand; however, I didn't have enough money to buy that many, so I decided in my desperation to talk to the editor and request credit. The leading paper at the time was the Detroit Free Press. I walked into the office marked 'Editorial' and told a young man that I needed to see the editor about something important — at least it was important to me. I was taken to an office where two men were present, and I explained what I had arranged with the telegraph and that I wanted a thousand papers but only had money for three hundred and needed credit. One of the men turned me down, but the other told him to let me have them. This man, I later learned, was Wilbur F. Storey, who would go on to found the Chicago Times and made a name for himself in the newspaper industry. With the help of another boy, I carried the papers to the train and started folding them. The first stop, called Utica, was a small place where I usually sold two papers. I noticed a crowd on the platform, assuming it to be some sort of excursion, but as soon as I arrived, there was a rush toward me; that’s when I realized that the telegraph was an incredible invention. I sold thirty-five papers there. The next stop was Mount Clemens, which is now a spa town but was then a place with about a thousand residents. I typically sold six to eight papers there. I decided that if I found a similar crowd there, the logical solution to my mistake of not getting more papers was to raise the price from five cents to ten. The crowd was indeed there, and I hiked up the price. At the various towns, I encountered similar crowds. In Port Huron, I had a habit of jumping from the train about a quarter of a mile from the station, where the train usually slowed down. I had even piled up several loads of sand at that spot to jump from, and I had become quite skilled at it. The little Dutch boy with the horse met me there. As the wagon approached the outskirts of the town, I was greeted by a large crowd. I then shouted, 'Twenty-five cents each, gentlemen! I don't have enough to go around!' I sold out, earning what was to me a huge amount of money."
Such episodes as this added materially to his income, but did not necessarily increase his savings, for he was then, as now, an utter spendthrift so long as some new apparatus or supplies for experiment could be had. In fact, the laboratory on wheels soon became crowded with such equipment, most costly chemicals were bought on the instalment plan, and Fresenius' Qualitative Analysis served as a basis for ceaseless testing and study. George Pullman, who then had a small shop at Detroit and was working on his sleeping-car, made Edison a lot of wooden apparatus for his chemicals, to the boy's delight. Unfortunately a sudden change came, fraught with disaster. The train, running one day at thirty miles an hour over a piece of poorly laid track, was thrown suddenly out of the perpendicular with a violent lurch, and, before Edison could catch it, a stick of phosphorus was jarred from its shelf, fell to the floor, and burst into flame. The car took fire, and the boy, in dismay, was still trying to quench the blaze when the conductor, a quick-tempered Scotchman, who acted also as baggage-master, hastened to the scene with water and saved his car. On the arrival at Mount Clemens station, its next stop, Edison and his entire outfit, laboratory, printing-plant, and all, were promptly ejected by the enraged conductor, and the train then moved off, leaving him on the platform, tearful and indignant in the midst of his beloved but ruined possessions. It was lynch law of a kind; but in view of the responsibility, this action of the conductor lay well within his rights and duties.
Such incidents like this significantly boosted his income, but didn’t necessarily help him save more money, since he was, as he always had been, a total spendthrift whenever he could get new equipment or supplies for his experiments. In fact, the mobile laboratory quickly became crammed with such gear, most expensive chemicals were purchased on the installment plan, and Fresenius' Qualitative Analysis provided a constant foundation for ongoing testing and learning. George Pullman, who at that time had a small shop in Detroit and was working on his sleeping car, made a lot of wooden equipment for Edison’s chemicals, much to the boy's joy. Unfortunately, a sudden change brought disaster. One day, as the train sped along at thirty miles an hour over a poorly laid track, it suddenly lurched violently, and before Edison could grab it, a stick of phosphorus was knocked off its shelf, fell to the floor, and ignited. The car caught fire, and the boy, in panic, was still trying to put out the flames when the conductor, a quick-tempered Scotsman who also handled baggage, rushed over with water and managed to save the car. Upon arriving at Mount Clemens station for its next stop, Edison and all his equipment—laboratory, printing press, and everything—were promptly kicked off by the angry conductor, and the train left, leaving him on the platform, tearful and furious amid his beloved but ruined belongings. It was a form of mob justice; however, considering the responsibility, the conductor's actions were well within his rights and duties.
It was through this incident that Edison acquired the deafness that has persisted all through his life, a severe box on the ears from the scorched and angry conductor being the direct cause of the infirmity. Although this deafness would be regarded as a great affliction by most people, and has brought in its train other serious baubles, Mr. Edison has always regarded it philosophically, and said about it recently: "This deafness has been of great advantage to me in various ways. When in a telegraph office, I could only hear the instrument directly on the table at which I sat, and unlike the other operators, I was not bothered by the other instruments. Again, in experimenting on the telephone, I had to improve the transmitter so I could hear it. This made the telephone commercial, as the magneto telephone receiver of Bell was too weak to be used as a transmitter commercially. It was the same with the phonograph. The great defect of that instrument was the rendering of the overtones in music, and the hissing consonants in speech. I worked over one year, twenty hours a day, Sundays and all, to get the word 'specie' perfectly recorded and reproduced on the phonograph. When this was done I knew that everything else could be done which was a fact. Again, my nerves have been preserved intact. Broadway is as quiet to me as a country village is to a person with normal hearing."
It was because of this incident that Edison became deaf, suffering a severe smack on the ears from the burned and angry conductor, which directly caused his hearing loss. While most people would see this deafness as a significant hardship, which has led to other serious challenges, Mr. Edison has always viewed it with a philosophical mindset. Recently, he said, "This deafness has actually been quite beneficial to me in many ways. When I was in a telegraph office, I could only hear the machine directly in front of me, and unlike the other operators, I wasn’t distracted by all the other machines. Also, when I was working on the telephone, I had to improve the transmitter so I could hear it. This led to the telephone becoming commercially viable, as Bell’s magneto telephone receiver was too weak to be used as a transmitter in business. The same went for the phonograph. The major flaw of that device was in capturing the overtones in music and the hissing consonants in speech. I spent over a year, working twenty hours a day, Sundays included, to get the word 'specie' perfectly recorded and played back on the phonograph. Once I achieved that, I knew everything else could be done, and that turned out to be true. Plus, my nerves have remained intact. To me, Broadway feels as quiet as a country village does to someone with normal hearing."
Saddened but not wholly discouraged, Edison soon reconstituted his laboratory and printing-office at home, although on the part of the family there was some fear and objection after this episode, on the score of fire. But Edison promised not to bring in anything of a dangerous nature. He did not cease the publication of the Weekly Herald. On the contrary, he prospered in both his enterprises until persuaded by the "printer's devil" in the office of the Port Huron Commercial to change the character of his journal, enlarge it, and issue it under the name of Paul Pry, a happy designation for this or kindred ventures in the domain of society journalism. No copies of Paul Pry can now be found, but it is known that its style was distinctly personal, that gossip was its specialty, and that no small offence was given to the people whose peculiarities or peccadilloes were discussed in a frank and breezy style by the two boys. In one instance the resentment of the victim of such unsought publicity was so intense he laid hands on Edison and pitched the startled young editor into the St. Clair River. The name of this violator of the freedom of the press was thereafter excluded studiously from the columns of Paul Pry, and the incident may have been one of those which soon caused the abandonment of the paper. Edison had great zest in this work, and but for the strong influences in other directions would probably have continued in the newspaper field, in which he was, beyond question, the youngest publisher and editor of the day.
Saddened but not completely discouraged, Edison quickly rebuilt his lab and printing office at home, even though his family was a bit worried and objected after the recent fire incident. However, Edison assured them he wouldn't bring in anything dangerous. He didn't stop publishing the Weekly Herald; in fact, he actually thrived in both his ventures until he was convinced by the "printer's devil" at the Port Huron Commercial to change the format of his journal, expand it, and rebrand it as Paul Pry—a fitting name for this kind of social journalism. No copies of Paul Pry exist today, but it's known that its style was very personal, focusing on gossip, which often upset the people whose quirks or minor missteps were openly discussed by the two boys in a casual tone. In one instance, the anger of someone exposed in such an unwanted way was so strong that he grabbed Edison and threw the surprised young editor into the St. Clair River. The name of this aggressor was deliberately omitted from the columns of Paul Pry, and this incident may have contributed to the eventual shutdown of the paper. Edison was passionate about this work, and if not for the strong influences pulling him in other directions, he probably would have continued in the newspaper business, where he was undoubtedly the youngest publisher and editor of his time.
Before leaving this period of his career, it is to be noted that it gave Edison many favorable opportunities. In Detroit he could spend frequent hours in the public library, and it is matter of record that he began his liberal acquaintance with its contents by grappling bravely with a certain section and trying to read it through consecutively, shelf by shelf, regardless of subject. In a way this is curiously suggestive of the earnest, energetic method of "frontal attack" with which the inventor has since addressed himself to so many problems in the arts and sciences.
Before moving on from this phase of his career, it's worth noting that it provided Edison with many great opportunities. In Detroit, he often spent hours at the public library, and records show that he started his extensive exploration of its collection by courageously tackling a specific section and attempting to read it straight through, shelf by shelf, without considering the subject matter. In a way, this is quite reminiscent of the determined, energetic "frontal attack" approach he has since taken to a variety of challenges in the arts and sciences.
The Grand Trunk Railroad machine-shops at Port Huron were a great attraction to the boy, who appears to have spent a good deal of his time there. He who was to have much to do with the evolution of the modern electric locomotive was fascinated by the mechanism of the steam locomotive; and whenever he could get the chance Edison rode in the cab with the engineer of his train. He became thoroughly familiar with the intricacies of fire-box, boiler, valves, levers, and gears, and liked nothing better than to handle the locomotive himself during the run. On one trip, when the engineer lay asleep while his eager substitute piloted the train, the boiler "primed," and a deluge overwhelmed the young driver, who stuck to his post till the run and the ordeal were ended. Possibly this helped to spoil a locomotive engineer, but went to make a great master of the new motive power. "Steam is half an Englishman," said Emerson. The temptation is strong to say that workaday electricity is half an American. Edison's own account of the incident is very laughable: "The engine was one of a number leased to the Grand Trunk by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy. It had bright brass bands all over, the woodwork beautifully painted, and everything highly polished, which was the custom up to the time old Commodore Vanderbilt stopped it on his roads. After running about fifteen miles the fireman couldn't keep his eyes open (this event followed an all-night dance of the trainmen's fraternal organization), and he agreed to permit me to run the engine. I took charge, reducing the speed to about twelve miles an hour, and brought the train of seven cars to her destination at the Grand Trunk junction safely. But something occurred which was very much out of the ordinary. I was very much worried about the water, and I knew that if it got low the boiler was likely to explode. I hadn't gone twenty miles before black damp mud blew out of the stack and covered every part of the engine, including myself. I was about to awaken the fireman to find out the cause of this when it stopped. Then I approached a station where the fireman always went out to the cowcatcher, opened the oil-cup on the steam-chest, and poured oil in. I started to carry out the procedure when, upon opening the oil-cup, the steam rushed out with a tremendous noise, nearly knocking me off the engine. I succeeded in closing the oil-cup and got back in the cab, and made up my mind that she would pull through without oil. I learned afterward that the engineer always shut off steam when the fireman went out to oil. This point I failed to notice. My powers of observation were very much improved after this occurrence. Just before I reached the junction another outpour of black mud occurred, and the whole engine was a sight—so much so that when I pulled into the yard everybody turned to see it, laughing immoderately. I found the reason of the mud was that I carried so much water it passed over into the stack, and this washed out all the accumulated soot."
The Grand Trunk Railroad machine shops in Port Huron really caught the boy's attention, and he seemed to spend a lot of time there. He, who would play a significant role in the development of the modern electric locomotive, was captivated by the workings of the steam locomotive. Whenever he had the chance, Edison would ride in the cab with the engineer of his train. He became very familiar with the details of the firebox, boiler, valves, levers, and gears, and he loved nothing more than to operate the locomotive himself during the journey. On one trip, while the engineer was asleep and the eager young substitute was driving the train, the boiler "primed," and a flood of steam overwhelmed the young driver, who stuck to his post until the ride and the challenge were over. This might have spoiled his chance to be a locomotive engineer but helped shape him into a great master of the new form of power. "Steam is half an Englishman," said Emerson. It’s tempting to say that everyday electricity is half an American. Edison's own account of the incident is quite funny: "The engine was one of several leased to the Grand Trunk by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy. It had shiny brass bands everywhere, beautifully painted woodwork, and everything was highly polished, which was the norm until Commodore Vanderbilt changed that on his railroads. After running about fifteen miles, the fireman couldn't stay awake (this happened after an all-night dance of the trainmen’s fraternal organization), and he let me take over running the engine. I took charge, slowed down to about twelve miles an hour, and safely brought the train of seven cars to the Grand Trunk junction. But something very unusual happened. I was quite worried about the water level, knowing that low water could cause the boiler to explode. I hadn’t gone twenty miles before black muddy soot blew out of the stack and covered every part of the engine, including me. Just as I was about to wake up the fireman to figure out what was going on, it stopped. Then, I approached a station where the fireman usually went to the cowcatcher, opened the oil cup on the steam chest, and added oil. I started to do the same, but when I opened the oil cup, steam rushed out with a loud noise, nearly knocking me off the engine. I managed to close the oil cup and get back in the cab, deciding that the engine would make it without oil. I later learned that the engineer always shut off the steam when the fireman went out to oil. I missed that detail. My observation skills definitely improved after that incident. Just before I reached the junction, another burst of black mud came out, and the whole engine was a sight to see—so much so that when I pulled into the yard, everyone turned to look, laughing heartily. I found out later that the reason for the mud was that I carried so much water it spilled over into the stack, washing out all the built-up soot."
One afternoon about a week before Christmas Edison's train jumped the track near Utica, a station on the line. Four old Michigan Central cars with rotten sills collapsed in the ditch and went all to pieces, distributing figs, raisins, dates, and candies all over the track and the vicinity. Hating to see so much waste, Edison tried to save all he could by eating it on the spot, but as a result "our family doctor had the time of his life with me in this connection."
One afternoon about a week before Christmas, Edison's train derailed near Utica, a station on the line. Four old Michigan Central cars with rotting sills fell into the ditch and broke apart, scattering figs, raisins, dates, and candies all over the tracks and the area. Disliking all the waste, Edison tried to save what he could by eating it right there, but as a result, "our family doctor had the time of his life with me in this connection."
An absurd incident described by Edison throws a vivid light on the free-and-easy condition of early railroad travel and on the Southern extravagance of the time. "In 1860, just before the war broke out there came to the train one afternoon, in Detroit, two fine-looking young men accompanied by a colored servant. They bought tickets for Port Huron, the terminal point for the train. After leaving the junction just outside of Detroit, I brought in the evening papers. When I came opposite the two young men, one of them said: 'Boy, what have you got?' I said: 'Papers.' 'All right.' He took them and threw them out of the window, and, turning to the colored man, said: 'Nicodemus, pay this boy.' I told Nicodemus the amount, and he opened a satchel and paid me. The passengers didn't know what to make of the transaction. I returned with the illustrated papers and magazines. These were seized and thrown out of the window, and I was told to get my money of Nicodemus. I then returned with all the old magazines and novels I had not been able to sell, thinking perhaps this would be too much for them. I was small and thin, and the layer reached above my head, and was all I could possibly carry. I had prepared a list, and knew the amount in case they bit again. When I opened the door, all the passengers roared with laughter. I walked right up to the young men. One asked me what I had. I said 'Magazines and novels.' He promptly threw them out of the window, and Nicodemus settled. Then I came in with cracked hickory nuts, then pop-corn balls, and, finally, molasses candy. All went out of the window. I felt like Alexander the Great!—I had no more chance! I had sold all I had. Finally I put a rope to my trunk, which was about the size of a carpenter's chest, and started to pull this from the baggage-car to the passenger-car. It was almost too much for my strength, but at last I got it in front of those men. I pulled off my coat, shoes, and hat, and laid them on the chest. Then he asked: 'What have you got, boy?' I said: 'Everything, sir, that I can spare that is for sale.' The passengers fairly jumped with laughter. Nicodemus paid me $27 for this last sale, and threw the whole out of the door in the rear of the car. These men were from the South, and I have always retained a soft spot in my heart for a Southern gentleman."
An absurd incident described by Edison sheds light on the relaxed nature of early railroad travel and the Southern extravagance of that era. "In 1860, just before the war started, two well-dressed young men came to the train one afternoon in Detroit, accompanied by a Black servant. They bought tickets to Port Huron, the train's final destination. After leaving the junction just outside of Detroit, I brought in the evening papers. When I reached the two young men, one of them asked, 'Boy, what do you have?' I replied, 'Papers.' 'All right.' He took them and tossed them out the window, then turned to the servant and said, 'Nicodemus, pay this boy.' I told Nicodemus the amount, and he opened a satchel to pay me. The other passengers were confused by the whole exchange. I returned with illustrated papers and magazines. They grabbed those and threw them out the window, telling me to get my money from Nicodemus. I then came back with all the old magazines and novels I couldn't sell, thinking maybe this would be too much for them. I was small and thin, and the stack reached above my head, which was all I could carry. I had made a list and knew the total in case they were interested again. When I opened the door, all the passengers burst out laughing. I walked right up to the young men. One asked me what I had. I said, 'Magazines and novels.' He promptly threw them out the window, and Nicodemus paid up. Then I brought in cracked hickory nuts, followed by popcorn balls, and finally, molasses candy. All of it went out the window. I felt like Alexander the Great!—I had run out of options! I had sold all I had. Finally, I tied a rope to my trunk, which was about the size of a carpenter's chest, and started pulling it from the baggage car to the passenger car. It was almost too heavy for me, but I managed to get it in front of those guys. I took off my coat, shoes, and hat and laid them on the trunk. Then he asked, 'What do you have, boy?' I replied, 'Everything, sir, that I can spare that's for sale.' The passengers nearly exploded with laughter. Nicodemus paid me $27 for this last sale and tossed the whole thing out the back door of the car. These men were from the South, and I've always had a soft spot in my heart for a Southern gentleman."
While Edison was a newsboy on the train a request came to him one day to go to the office of E. B. Ward & Company, at that time the largest owners of steamboats on the Great Lakes. The captain of their largest boat had died suddenly, and they wanted a message taken to another captain who lived about fourteen miles from Ridgeway station on the railroad. This captain had retired, taken up some lumber land, and had cleared part of it. Edison was offered $15 by Mr. Ward to go and fetch him, but as it was a wild country and would be dark, Edison stood out for $25, so that he could get the companionship of another lad. The terms were agreed to. Edison arrived at Ridgeway at 8.30 P.M., when it was raining and as dark as ink. Getting another boy with difficulty to volunteer, he launched out on his errand in the pitch-black night. The two boys carried lanterns, but the road was a rough path through dense forest. The country was wild, and it was a usual occurrence to see deer, bear, and coon skins nailed up on the sides of houses to dry. Edison had read about bears, but couldn't remember whether they were day or night prowlers. The farther they went the more apprehensive they became, and every stump in the ravished forest looked like a bear. The other lad proposed seeking safety up a tree, but Edison demurred on the plea that bears could climb, and that the message must be delivered that night to enable the captain to catch the morning train. First one lantern went out, then the other. "We leaned up against a tree and cried. I thought if I ever got out of that scrape alive I would know more about the habits of animals and everything else, and be prepared for all kinds of mischance when I undertook an enterprise. However, the intense darkness dilated the pupils of our eyes so as to make them very sensitive, and we could just see at times the outlines of the road. Finally, just as a faint gleam of daylight arrived, we entered the captain's yard and delivered the message. In my whole life I never spent such a night of horror as this, but I got a good lesson."
While Edison was selling newspapers on the train, he received a request one day to go to the office of E. B. Ward & Company, which was then the biggest owner of steamboats on the Great Lakes. The captain of their largest boat had died unexpectedly, and they needed someone to deliver a message to another captain who lived about fourteen miles from Ridgeway station on the railroad. This captain had retired, acquired some lumber land, and had cleared part of it. Mr. Ward offered Edison $15 to go and bring him back, but since it was a remote area and would soon be dark, Edison insisted on $25 so he could have another boy accompany him. They agreed on the terms. Edison arrived at Ridgeway at 8:30 P.M. when it was raining and pitch black. After some difficulty, he found another boy to join him, and they set out on their mission into the dark night. The boys carried lanterns, but the path was rough and went through dense woods. The area was wild, and it was common to see deer, bear, and raccoon skins nailed to the sides of houses to dry. Edison had read about bears but couldn't remember if they were active during the day or night. The further they traveled, the more anxious they became, and every stump in the devastated forest looked like a bear. The other boy suggested climbing a tree for safety, but Edison argued that bears could climb too, and they needed to deliver the message that night so the captain could catch the morning train. First, one lantern went out, then the other. "We leaned against a tree and cried. I thought if I ever got out of that situation alive, I would learn more about animal habits and prepare for all kinds of mishaps in the future. However, the intense darkness made our eyes very sensitive, and we could just barely see the outlines of the road at times. Finally, just as a faint hint of daylight came, we entered the captain's yard and delivered the message. In my whole life, I never spent such a night of terror, but I learned a valuable lesson."
An amusing incident of this period is told by Edison. "When I was a boy," he says, "the Prince of Wales, the late King Edward, came to Canada (1860). Great preparations were made at Sarnia, the Canadian town opposite Port Huron. About every boy, including myself, went over to see the affair. The town was draped in flags most profusely, and carpets were laid on the cross-walks for the prince to walk on. There were arches, etc. A stand was built raised above the general level, where the prince was to be received by the mayor. Seeing all these preparations, my idea of a prince was very high; but when he did arrive I mistook the Duke of Newcastle for him, the duke being a fine-looking man. I soon saw that I was mistaken: that the prince was a young stripling, and did not meet expectations. Several of us expressed our belief that a prince wasn't much, after all, and said that we were thoroughly disappointed. For this one boy was whipped. Soon the Canuck boys attacked the Yankee boys, and we were all badly licked. I, myself, got a black eye. That has always prejudiced me against that kind of ceremonial and folly." It is certainly interesting to note that in later years the prince for whom Edison endured the ignominy of a black eye made generous compensation in a graceful letter accompanying the gold Albert Medal awarded by the Royal Society of Arts.
An amusing story from this time is shared by Edison. "When I was a kid," he says, "the Prince of Wales, the late King Edward, visited Canada (1860). There were huge preparations in Sarnia, the Canadian town across from Port Huron. Almost every boy, including me, went over to check it out. The town was decked out in flags everywhere, and carpets were laid on the sidewalks for the prince to walk on. There were arches and more. A raised platform was built where the mayor would welcome the prince. Seeing all these preparations, I had high expectations of what a prince would be like; but when he arrived, I mistook the Duke of Newcastle for him, since the duke was a handsome man. I quickly realized I was wrong: the prince was just a young guy and didn’t live up to the hype. Several of us said we thought a prince wasn't anything special after all, and we felt totally let down. One boy got punished for this. Soon, the Canadian boys started fighting the American boys, and we all ended up getting beaten up. I ended up with a black eye. That has always made me skeptical about that kind of event and nonsense." Interestingly, in later years, the prince for whom Edison endured the embarrassment of a black eye made up for it with a thoughtful letter that came with the gold Albert Medal awarded by the Royal Society of Arts.
Another incident of the period is as follows: "After selling papers in Port Huron, which was often not reached until about 9.30 at night, I seldom got home before 11.00 or 11.30. About half-way home from the station and the town, and within twenty-five feet of the road in a dense wood, was a soldiers' graveyard where three hundred soldiers were buried, due to a cholera epidemic which took place at Fort Gratiot, near by, many years previously. At first we used to shut our eyes and run the horse past this graveyard, and if the horse stepped on a twig my heart would give a violent movement, and it is a wonder that I haven't some valvular disease of that organ. But soon this running of the horse became monotonous, and after a while all fears of graveyards absolutely disappeared from my system. I was in the condition of Sam Houston, the pioneer and founder of Texas, who, it was said, knew no fear. Houston lived some distance from the town and generally went home late at night, having to pass through a dark cypress swamp over a corduroy road. One night, to test his alleged fearlessness, a man stationed himself behind a tree and enveloped himself in a sheet. He confronted Houston suddenly, and Sam stopped and said: 'If you are a man, you can't hurt me. If you are a ghost, you don't want to hurt me. And if you are the devil, come home with me; I married your sister!'"
Another incident from that time goes like this: "After selling papers in Port Huron, which I often didn’t reach until around 9:30 at night, I rarely got home before 11:00 or 11:30. About halfway home from the station and town, and just twenty-five feet from the road in a thick forest, there was a soldiers' cemetery where three hundred soldiers were buried, victims of a cholera outbreak that occurred at the nearby Fort Gratiot many years earlier. At first, I would close my eyes and rush the horse past this graveyard, and if the horse stepped on a twig, my heart would race. It's a wonder I don’t have a heart condition from it. But soon riding past the graveyard became routine, and eventually, all my fears about it vanished completely. I felt like Sam Houston, the pioneer and founder of Texas, who was said to be fearless. Houston lived some distance from town and usually headed home late at night, needing to pass through a dark cypress swamp on a bumpy road. One night, to test his supposed bravery, a man hid behind a tree and wrapped himself in a sheet. He suddenly confronted Houston, who stopped and said: 'If you are a man, you can’t hurt me. If you are a ghost, you don’t want to hurt me. And if you are the devil, come home with me; I married your sister!'"
It is not to be inferred, however, from some of the preceding statements that the boy was of an exclusively studious bent of mind. He had then, as now, the keen enjoyment of a joke, and no particular aversion to the practical form. An incident of the time is in point. "After the breaking out of the war there was a regiment of volunteer soldiers quartered at Fort Gratiot, the reservation extending to the boundary line of our house. Nearly every night we would hear a call, such as 'Corporal of the Guard, No. 1.' This would be repeated from sentry to sentry until it reached the barracks, when Corporal of the Guard, No. 1, would come and see what was wanted. I and the little Dutch boy, after returning from the town after selling our papers, thought we would take a hand at military affairs. So one night, when it was very dark, I shouted for Corporal of the Guard, No. 1. The second sentry, thinking it was the terminal sentry who shouted, repeated it to the third, and so on. This brought the corporal along the half mile, only to find that he was fooled. We tried him three nights; but the third night they were watching, and caught the little Dutch boy, took him to the lock-up at the fort, and shut him up. They chased me to the house. I rushed for the cellar. In one small apartment there were two barrels of potatoes and a third one nearly empty. I poured these remnants into the other barrels, sat down, and pulled the barrel over my head, bottom up. The soldiers had awakened my father, and they were searching for me with candles and lanterns. The corporal was absolutely certain I came into the cellar, and couldn't see how I could have gotten out, and wanted to know from my father if there was no secret hiding-place. On assurance of my father, who said that there was not, he said it was most extraordinary. I was glad when they left, as I was cramped, and the potatoes were rotten that had been in the barrel and violently offensive. The next morning I was found in bed, and received a good switching on the legs from my father, the first and only one I ever received from him, although my mother kept a switch behind the old Seth Thomas clock that had the bark worn off. My mother's ideas and mine differed at times, especially when I got experimenting and mussed up things. The Dutch boy was released next morning."
It's not to be assumed, however, from some of the earlier statements that the boy was solely focused on studying. He had, just like now, a great sense of humor and didn't mind practical matters. An incident from that time is relevant. "After the war broke out, a regiment of volunteer soldiers was stationed at Fort Gratiot, which extended to the boundary of our property. Almost every night, we would hear a call, like 'Corporal of the Guard, No. 1.' This would be echoed from one sentinel to another until it reached the barracks, where Corporal of the Guard, No. 1, would come to find out what was needed. After we returned from town selling our papers, I and the little Dutch boy thought we’d get involved in military affairs. So one night, when it was pitch black, I yelled for Corporal of the Guard, No. 1. The second sentinel, thinking it was the final sentinel calling out, repeated it to the third, and so on. This brought the corporal down the half-mile, only to realize he had been tricked. We tried this for three nights; but on the third night, they were on alert and caught the little Dutch boy, taking him to the lock-up at the fort. They chased me back to the house. I ran to the cellar. In one small room, there were two barrels of potatoes and a third one that was almost empty. I dumped the remnants into the other barrels, sat down, and rolled a barrel over my head, upside down. The soldiers had woken my father and were searching for me with candles and lanterns. The corporal was convinced I had gone into the cellar and couldn’t figure out how I could have gotten out, wanting to know from my father if there was any secret hiding place. After my father assured him there wasn’t, he said it was quite extraordinary. I was relieved when they left, as I was cramped, and the potatoes that had been sitting in the barrel were rotten and smelled terrible. The next morning, I was found in bed and got a good spanking on my legs from my father, the first and only one I ever received from him, even though my mother kept a switch behind the old Seth Thomas clock that had the bark worn off. My mother and I didn’t always see eye to eye, especially when I started experimenting and making a mess. The Dutch boy was released the next morning."
CHAPTER IV
THE YOUNG TELEGRAPH OPERATOR
"WHILE a newsboy on the railroad," says Edison, "I got very much interested in electricity, probably from visiting telegraph offices with a chum who had tastes similar to mine." It will also have been noted that he used the telegraph to get items for his little journal, and to bulletin his special news of the Civil War along the line. The next step was natural, and having with his knowledge of chemistry no trouble about "setting up" his batteries, the difficulties of securing apparatus were chiefly those connected with the circuits and the instruments. American youths to-day are given, if of a mechanical turn of mind, to amateur telegraphy or telephony, but seldom, if ever, have to make any part of the system constructed. In Edison's boyish days it was quite different, and telegraphic supplies were hard to obtain. But he and his "chum" had a line between their homes, built of common stove-pipe wire. The insulators were bottles set on nails driven into trees and short poles. The magnet wire was wound with rags for insulation, and pieces of spring brass were used for keys. With an idea of securing current cheaply, Edison applied the little that he knew about static electricity, and actually experimented with cats, which he treated vigorously as frictional machines until the animals fled in dismay, and Edison had learned his first great lesson in the relative value of sources of electrical energy. The line was made to work, however, and additional to the messages that the boys interchanged, Edison secured practice in an ingenious manner. His father insisted on 11.30 as proper bedtime, which left but a short interval after the long day on the train. But each evening, when the boy went home with a bundle of papers that had not been sold in the town, his father would sit up reading the "returnables." Edison, therefore, on some excuse, left the papers with his friend, but suggested that he could get the news from him by telegraph, bit by bit. The scheme interested his father, and was put into effect, the messages being written down and handed over for perusal. This yielded good practice nightly, lasting until 12 and 1 o'clock, and was maintained for some time until Mr. Edison became willing that his son should stay up for a reasonable time. The papers were then brought home again, and the boys amused themselves to their hearts' content until the line was pulled down by a stray cow wandering through the orchard. Meantime better instruments had been secured, and the rudiments of telegraphy had been fairly mastered.
"WHILE I was a newsboy on the railroad," says Edison, "I became really interested in electricity, probably because I visited telegraph offices with a friend who had similar interests." It's also noted that he used the telegraph to gather items for his little journal and to share his special news about the Civil War along the route. The next step came naturally, and with his knowledge of chemistry, he had no trouble "setting up" his batteries; the main challenges in securing equipment were related to the circuits and instruments. Today, American kids with a mechanical bent often get into amateur telegraphy or telephony, but they rarely have to build any part of the system themselves. In Edison's youth, it was quite different, and telegraphic supplies were difficult to find. Nevertheless, he and his friend set up a line between their homes using regular stove-pipe wire. The insulators were bottles resting on nails driven into trees and short poles. The magnet wire was wrapped in rags for insulation, and pieces of spring brass were used as keys. Hoping to save money on current, Edison applied what he knew about static electricity and actually experimented with cats, treating them vigorously as friction machines until the animals ran away in terror, teaching Edison his first important lesson about the value of different sources of electrical energy. The line worked, though, and in addition to the messages exchanged, Edison found a clever way to get practice. His father insisted on a bedtime of 11:30, leaving only a short time after a long day on the train. Each evening, when the boy came home with unsold papers, his father would stay up reading the "returnables." So, Edison would leave the papers with his friend and suggested he could get the news by telegraph, piece by piece. His father liked the idea, and it was put into action, with messages written down and passed over for reading. This provided good practice each night, lasting until midnight or later, and continued for a while until Mr. Edison agreed that his son could stay up for a reasonable amount of time. The papers were then taken back home, and the boys enjoyed themselves to their hearts' content until their line was knocked down by a stray cow wandering through the orchard. Meanwhile, they had managed to get better instruments and had fairly mastered the basics of telegraphy.
The mixed train on which Edison was employed as newsboy did the way-freight work and shunting at the Mount Clemens station, about half an hour being usually spent in the work. One August morning, in 1862, while the shunting was in progress, and a laden box-car had been pushed out of a siding, Edison, who was loitering about the platform, saw the little son of the station agent, Mr. J. U. Mackenzie, playing with the gravel on the main track along which the car without a brakeman was rapidly approaching. Edison dropped his papers and his glazed cap, and made a dash for the child, whom he picked up and lifted to safety without a second to spare, as the wheel of the car struck his heel; and both were cut about the face and hands by the gravel ballast on which they fell. The two boys were picked up by the train-hands and carried to the platform, and the grateful father at once offered to teach the rescuer, whom he knew and liked, the art of train telegraphy and to make an operator of him. It is needless to say that the proposal was eagerly accepted.
The mixed train that Edison worked on as a newsboy handled freight and switching at the Mount Clemens station, usually spending about half an hour on this task. One August morning in 1862, while the switching was happening and a loaded boxcar had been pushed out of a siding, Edison, who was hanging around the platform, noticed the little son of the station agent, Mr. J. U. Mackenzie, playing with gravel on the main track where a car without a brakeman was coming toward him. Edison dropped his papers and his shiny cap and rushed toward the child, picking him up and getting him to safety just in time as the car's wheel hit his heel. Both of them were cut on the face and hands by the gravel ballast they landed on. The train crew picked up the two boys and carried them to the platform, and the thankful father immediately offered to teach the rescuer, whom he knew and liked, how to use the train telegraph and to train him as an operator. It goes without saying that the offer was eagerly accepted.
Edison found time for his new studies by letting one of his friends look after the newsboy work on the train for part of the trip, reserving to himself the run between Port Huron and Mount Clemens. That he was already well qualified as a beginner is evident from the fact that he had mastered the Morse code of the telegraphic alphabet, and was able to take to the station a neat little set of instruments he had just finished with his own hands at a gun-shop in Detroit. This was probably a unique achievement in itself among railway operators of that day or of later times. The drill of the student involved chiefly the acquisition of the special signals employed in railway work, including the numerals and abbreviations applied to save time. Some of these have passed into the slang of the day, "73" being well known as a telegrapher's expression of compliments or good wishes, while "23" is an accident or death message, and has been given broader popular significance as a general synonym for "hoodoo." All of this came easily to Edison, who had, moreover, as his Herald showed, an unusual familiarity with train movement along that portion of the Grand Trunk road.
Edison made time for his new studies by having a friend take over the newsboy job on the train for part of the trip, while he handled the route between Port Huron and Mount Clemens. It’s clear he was already well-prepared as a beginner, since he had mastered the Morse code of the telegraphic alphabet and brought a neat little set of instruments he had just built himself at a gun shop in Detroit to the station. This was probably a unique accomplishment among railway operators of his time or even later. The student’s training mainly involved learning the special signals used in railway work, including the numbers and abbreviations designed to save time. Some of these have become part of common slang, with "73" being widely recognized as a telegrapher's way of sending compliments or good wishes, while "23" signifies an accident or death message and has taken on a broader meaning as a synonym for "bad luck." All of this came naturally to Edison, who, as his Herald indicated, had an uncommon understanding of train movements along that part of the Grand Trunk road.
Three or four months were spent pleasantly and profitably by the youth in this course of study, and Edison took to it enthusiastically, giving it no less than eighteen hours a day. He then put up a little telegraph line from the station to the village, a distance of about a mile, and opened an office in a drug store; but the business was naturally very small. The telegraph operator at Port Huron knowing of his proficiency, and wanting to get into the United States Military Telegraph Corps, where the pay in those days of the Civil War was high, succeeded in convincing his brother-in-law, Mr. M. Walker, that young Edison could fill the position. Edison was, of course, well acquainted with the operators along the road and at the southern terminal, and took up his new duties very easily. The office was located in a jewelry store, where newspapers and periodicals were also sold. Edison was to be found at the office both day and night, sleeping there. "I became quite valuable to Mr. Walker. After working all day I worked at the office nights as well, for the reason that 'press report' came over one of the wires until 3 A.M., and I would cut in and copy it as well as I could, to become more rapidly proficient. The goal of the rural telegraph operator was to be able to take press. Mr. Walker tried to get my father to apprentice me at $20 per month, but they could not agree. I then applied for a job on the Grand Trunk Railroad as a railway operator, and was given a place, nights, at Stratford Junction, Canada." Apparently his friend Mackenzie helped him in the matter. The position carried a salary of $25 per month. No serious objections were raised by his family, for the distance from Port Huron was not great, and Stratford was near Bayfield, the old home from which the Edisons had come, so that there were doubtless friends or even relatives in the vicinity. This was in 1863.
Three or four months went by pleasantly and productively for the young man during his studies, and Edison threw himself into it, dedicating no less than eighteen hours a day. He then set up a small telegraph line from the station to the village, about a mile away, and opened an office in a drug store; however, the business was quite small. The telegraph operator in Port Huron, aware of his skills and eager to join the United States Military Telegraph Corps, which paid well during the Civil War, convinced his brother-in-law, Mr. M. Walker, that young Edison could handle the job. Edison, of course, knew the operators along the line and at the southern terminal well and adapted to his new responsibilities easily. The office was situated in a jewelry store where newspapers and magazines were also sold. Edison was often found at the office day and night, even sleeping there. "I became quite valuable to Mr. Walker. After working all day, I also worked at the office at night because the 'press report' came over one of the wires until 3 A.M., and I would connect in and copy it as best I could to become more skilled quickly. The aim of a rural telegraph operator was to be able to take press. Mr. Walker tried to convince my father to apprentice me for $20 per month, but they couldn’t come to an agreement. I then applied for a job with the Grand Trunk Railroad as a railway operator and was offered a night position at Stratford Junction, Canada." Apparently, his friend Mackenzie assisted him with this. The job paid $25 per month. His family had no serious objections, as Port Huron was not far away, and Stratford was close to Bayfield, the old home from which the Edisons had come, so there were likely friends or even relatives nearby. This was in 1863.
Mr. Walker was an observant man, who has since that time installed a number of waterworks systems and obtained several patents of his own. He describes the boy of sixteen as engrossed intensely in his experiments and scientific reading, and somewhat indifferent, for this reason, to his duties as operator. This office was not particularly busy, taking from $50 to $75 a month, but even the messages taken in would remain unsent on the hook while Edison was in the cellar below trying to solve some chemical problem. The manager would see him studying sometimes an article in such a paper as the Scientific American, and then disappearing to buy a few sundries for experiments. Returning from the drug store with his chemicals, he would not be seen again until required by his duties, or until he had found out for himself, if possible, in this offhand manner, whether what he had read was correct or not. When he had completed his experiment all interest in it was lost, and the jars and wires would be left to any fate that might befall them. In like manner Edison would make free use of the watchmaker's tools that lay on the little table in the front window, and would take the wire pliers there without much thought as to their value as distinguished from a lineman's tools. The one idea was to do quickly what he wanted to do; and the same swift, almost headlong trial of anything that comes to hand, while the fervor of a new experiment is felt, has been noted at all stages of the inventor's career. One is reminded of Palissy's recklessness, when in his efforts to make the enamel melt on his pottery he used the very furniture of his home for firewood.
Mr. Walker was a keen observer who later installed several water systems and got a few patents of his own. He describes the sixteen-year-old boy as deeply focused on his experiments and scientific reading, which made him a bit indifferent to his job as an operator. This position wasn't particularly busy, earning between $50 and $75 a month, but even the messages that came in would sit unsent on the hook while Edison was downstairs trying to solve some chemical problem. The manager would occasionally see him studying an article in a magazine like Scientific American and then vanishing to buy some supplies for his experiments. After coming back from the drugstore with his chemicals, he wouldn't be seen again until he needed to do his job or until he had figured out, if he could, whether what he had read was right or not. Once he had finished an experiment, he would lose all interest in it, leaving the jars and wires to whatever might happen to them. Similarly, Edison would freely use the watchmaker's tools on the small table in the front window and take the wire pliers without much regard for their value compared to lineman's tools. His single focus was to quickly accomplish what he wanted; this same swift, almost reckless approach to trying anything that was at hand, fueled by the excitement of a new experiment, has been noted throughout the inventor's career. It brings to mind Palissy's recklessness when, in his pursuit to make the enamel melt on his pottery, he used his own furniture for firewood.
Mr. Edison remarks the fact that there was very little difference between the telegraph of that time and of to-day, except the general use of the old Morse register with the dots and dashes recorded by indenting paper strips that could be read and checked later at leisure if necessary. He says: "The telegraph men couldn't explain how it worked, and I was always trying to get them to do so. I think they couldn't. I remember the best explanation I got was from an old Scotch line repairer employed by the Montreal Telegraph Company, which operated the railroad wires. He said that if you had a dog like a dachshund, long enough to reach from Edinburgh to London, if you pulled his tail in Edinburgh he would bark in London. I could understand that, but I never could get it through me what went through the dog or over the wire." To-day Mr. Edison is just as unable to solve the inner mystery of electrical transmission. Nor is he alone. At the banquet given to celebrate his jubilee in 1896 as professor at Glasgow University, Lord Kelvin, the greatest physicist of our time, admitted with tears in his eyes and the note of tragedy in his voice, that when it came to explaining the nature of electricity, he knew just as little as when he had begun as a student, and felt almost as though his life had been wasted while he tried to grapple with the great mystery of physics.
Mr. Edison points out that there isn’t much difference between the telegraph of his time and the one today, except for the widespread use of the old Morse register, which recorded dots and dashes by indenting paper strips that could be reviewed later if needed. He says: "The telegraph operators couldn't explain how it worked, and I was always trying to get them to do so. I think they genuinely couldn't. The best explanation I got was from an old Scottish line repairman working for the Montreal Telegraph Company, which handled the railroad wires. He said that if you had a dachshund long enough to stretch from Edinburgh to London, pulling its tail in Edinburgh would make it bark in London. That made sense to me, but I could never figure out what went through the dog or over the wire." Today, Mr. Edison is still unable to unravel the inner mystery of electrical transmission. And he’s not alone. At the banquet celebrating his jubilee in 1896 as a professor at Glasgow University, Lord Kelvin, the greatest physicist of our time, admitted with tears in his eyes and a tragic tone in his voice that when it came to understanding electricity, he knew just as little as when he started as a student, and he felt almost as if his life had been wasted while trying to tackle the great mystery of physics.
Another episode of this period is curious in its revelation of the tenacity with which Edison has always held to some of his oldest possessions with a sense of personal attachment. "While working at Stratford Junction," he says, "I was told by one of the freight conductors that in the freight-house at Goodrich there were several boxes of old broken-up batteries. I went there and found over eighty cells of the well-known Grove nitric-acid battery. The operator there, who was also agent, when asked by me if I could have the electrodes of each cell, made of sheet platinum, gave his permission readily, thinking they were of tin. I removed them all, amounting to several ounces. Platinum even in those days was very expensive, costing several dollars an ounce, and I owned only three small strips. I was overjoyed at this acquisition, and those very strips and the reworked scrap are used to this day in my laboratory over forty years later."
Another interesting episode from this time shows how strongly Edison has always clung to some of his oldest possessions with a personal connection. "While I was working at Stratford Junction," he recalls, "one of the freight conductors told me there were several boxes of old, broken batteries in the freight house at Goodrich. I went there and discovered over eighty cells of the well-known Grove nitric-acid battery. The operator there, who also served as the agent, readily allowed me to take the electrodes from each cell, made of sheet platinum, thinking they were tin. I removed all of them, which added up to several ounces. Platinum was very expensive back then, costing several dollars an ounce, and I only had three small strips. I was thrilled with this find, and those same strips and the reworked scrap are still being used in my laboratory more than forty years later."
It was at Stratford that Edison's inventiveness was first displayed. The hours of work of a night operator are usually from 7 P.M. to 7 A.M., and to insure attention while on duty it is often provided that the operator every hour, from 9 P.M. until relieved by the day operator, shall send in the signal "6" to the train dispatcher's office. Edison revelled in the opportunity for study and experiment given him by his long hours of freedom in the daytime, but needed sleep, just as any healthy youth does. Confronted by the necessity of sending in this watchman's signal as evidence that he was awake and on duty, he constructed a small wheel with notches on the rim, and attached it to the clock in such a manner that the night-watchman could start it when the line was quiet, and at each hour the wheel revolved and sent in accurately the dots required for "sixing." The invention was a success, the device being, indeed, similar to that of the modern district messenger box; but it was soon noticed that, in spite of the regularity of the report, "Sf" could not be raised even if a train message were sent immediately after. Detection and a reprimand came in due course, but were not taken very seriously.
It was in Stratford that Edison's creativity first shone through. The hours for a night operator typically run from 7 P.M. to 7 A.M., and to ensure they stay alert during their shift, it's often required that the operator sends the signal "6" to the train dispatcher's office every hour from 9 P.M. until replaced by the day operator. Edison enjoyed the time for study and experimentation he had during the long daylight hours, but he also needed sleep like any healthy young person. Faced with the requirement to send this watchman's signal as proof that he was awake and working, he created a small wheel with notches around its edge and attached it to the clock in a way that allowed the night-watchman to start it when the line was quiet. Each hour, the wheel would turn and automatically send the dots needed for "sixing." The invention worked well, resembling the modern district messenger box; however, it was soon noticed that, despite the regularity of the report, "Sf" couldn't be raised even if a train message was sent right after. Eventually, he was caught and reprimanded, but it wasn't taken very seriously.
A serious occurrence that might have resulted in accident drove him soon after from Canada, although the youth could hardly be held to blame for it. Edison says: "This night job just suited me, as I could have the whole day to myself. I had the faculty of sleeping in a chair any time for a few minutes at a time. I taught the night-yardman my call, so I could get half an hour's sleep now and then between trains, and in case the station was called the watchman would awaken me. One night I got an order to hold a freight train, and I replied that I would. I rushed out to find the signalman, but before I could find him and get the signal set, the train ran past. I ran to the telegraph office, and reported that I could not hold her. The reply was: 'Hell!' The train dispatcher, on the strength of my message that I would hold the train, had permitted another to leave the last station in the opposite direction. There was a lower station near the junction where the day operator slept. I started for it on foot. The night was dark, and I fell into a culvert and was knocked senseless." Owing to the vigilance of the two engineers on the locomotives, who saw each other approaching on the straight single track, nothing more dreadful happened than a summons to the thoughtless operator to appear before the general manager at Toronto. On reaching the manager's office, his trial for neglect of duty was fortunately interrupted by the call of two Englishmen; and while their conversation proceeded, Edison slipped quietly out of the room, hurried to the Grand Trunk freight depot, found a conductor he knew taking out a freight train for Sarnia, and was not happy until the ferry-boat from Sarnia had landed him once more on the Michigan shore. The Grand Trunk still owes Mr. Edison the wages due him at the time he thus withdrew from its service, but the claim has never been pressed.
A serious incident that could have led to an accident forced him to leave Canada soon after, although the young man couldn't really be blamed for it. Edison says: "This night job worked perfectly for me because I had the whole day to myself. I had a knack for sleeping in a chair for a few minutes at a time whenever I needed. I taught the night yardman my call, so I could catch half an hour of sleep now and then between trains, and if the station was called, the watchman would wake me up. One night, I got an order to hold a freight train, and I said I would. I rushed out to find the signalman, but before I could find him and get the signal set, the train passed by. I ran to the telegraph office and reported that I couldn't hold it. The reply was: 'Hell!' The train dispatcher, relying on my message that I would hold the train, had allowed another one to leave the last station going the opposite way. There was a lower station near the junction where the day operator was sleeping. I started walking there. The night was dark, and I fell into a culvert and was knocked out." Thanks to the alertness of the two engineers on the locomotives, who saw each other coming on the straight single track, nothing worse happened than a call for the careless operator to appear before the general manager in Toronto. When he got to the manager's office, his trial for neglect of duty was fortunately interrupted by two Englishmen; and while they talked, Edison quietly slipped out of the room, hurried to the Grand Trunk freight depot, found a conductor he knew taking out a freight train to Sarnia, and didn't feel at ease until the ferry from Sarnia brought him back to the Michigan shore. The Grand Trunk still owes Mr. Edison the wages he was due at the time he left their service, but the claim has never been pursued.
The same winter of 1863-64, while at Port Huron, Edison had a further opportunity of displaying his ingenuity. An ice-jam had broken the light telegraph cable laid in the bed of the river across to Sarnia, and thus communication was interrupted. The river is three-quarters of a mile wide, and could not be crossed on foot; nor could the cable be repaired. Edison at once suggested using the steam whistle of the locomotive, and by manipulating the valve conversed the short and long outbursts of shrill sound into the Morse code. An operator on the Sarnia shore was quick enough to catch the significance of the strange whistling, and messages were thus sent in wireless fashion across the ice-floes in the river. It is said that such signals were also interchanged by military telegraphers during the war, and possibly Edison may have heard of the practice; but be that as it may, he certainly showed ingenuity and resource in applying such a method to meet the necessity. It is interesting to note that at this point the Grand Trunk now has its St. Clair tunnel, through which the trains are hauled under the river-bed by electric locomotives.
The same winter of 1863-64, while in Port Huron, Edison had another chance to show his ingenuity. An ice jam had broken the light telegraph cable that was laid across the river to Sarnia, interrupting communication. The river is three-quarters of a mile wide and couldn’t be crossed on foot; plus, the cable couldn’t be repaired. Edison immediately suggested using the steam whistle of the locomotive and, by manipulating the valve, converted the short and long blasts of sound into Morse code. An operator on the Sarnia side was quick enough to recognize the meaning behind the unusual whistling, allowing messages to be sent wirelessly across the ice floes in the river. It’s said that military telegraphers also exchanged such signals during the war, and Edison may have heard of this practice; however, regardless of that, he certainly demonstrated creativity and resourcefulness in using this method to meet the need. It’s interesting to note that at this location, the Grand Trunk now has its St. Clair tunnel, through which trains are pulled under the riverbed by electric locomotives.
Edison had now begun unconsciously the roaming and drifting that took him during the next five years all over the Middle States, and that might well have wrecked the career of any one less persistent and industrious. It was a period of his life corresponding to the Wanderjahre of the German artisan, and was an easy way of gratifying a taste for travel without the risk of privation. To-day there is little temptation to the telegrapher to go to distant parts of the country on the chance that he may secure a livelihood at the key. The ranks are well filled everywhere, and of late years the telegraph as an art or industry has shown relatively slight expansion, owing chiefly to the development of telephony. Hence, if vacancies occur, there are plenty of operators available, and salaries have remained so low as to lead to one or two formidable and costly strikes that unfortunately took no account of the economic conditions of demand and supply. But in the days of the Civil War there was a great dearth of skilful manipulators of the key. About fifteen hundred of the best operators in the country were at the front on the Federal side alone, and several hundred more had enlisted. This created a serious scarcity, and a nomadic operator going to any telegraphic centre would be sure to find a place open waiting for him. At the close of the war a majority of those who had been with the two opposed armies remained at the key under more peaceful surroundings, but the rapid development of the commercial and railroad systems fostered a new demand, and then for a time it seemed almost impossible to train new operators fast enough. In a few years, however, the telephone sprang into vigorous existence, dating from 1876, drawing off some of the most adventurous spirits from the telegraph field; and the deterrent influence of the telephone on the telegraph had made itself felt by 1890. The expiration of the leading Bell telephone patents, five years later, accentuated even more sharply the check that had been put on telegraphy, as hundreds and thousands of "independent" telephone companies were then organized, throwing a vast network of toll lines over Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and other States, and affording cheap, instantaneous means of communication without any necessity for the intervention of an operator.
Edison had now started the wandering that would take him across the Middle States over the next five years, a journey that could have destroyed the career of anyone less determined and hardworking. This period of his life was similar to the Wanderjahre of German craftsmen, allowing him to indulge his passion for travel without facing hardship. Today, there’s little incentive for telegraphers to venture to far-off places hoping to find work at the key. The workforce is well-filled everywhere, and in recent years, the telegraph industry has seen minimal growth due to the rise of telephony. As a result, when job openings arise, there are plenty of operators ready to step in, and salaries have remained so low that they’ve led to a couple of significant and costly strikes that unfortunately ignored the economic principles of supply and demand. However, during the Civil War, there was a severe shortage of skilled telegraph operators. About fifteen hundred of the best operators in the country were serving in the Federal army, with several hundred more having enlisted. This situation created a major lack, and a telegraph operator arriving at any telegraphic center would definitely find a job waiting for him. After the war, most of those who had worked for the two opposing armies continued to operate under calmer conditions, but the rapid growth of commercial and railroad systems created a new demand, making it difficult to train new operators quickly enough. In a few years, though, the telephone came into full swing, starting in 1876, attracting many of the more adventurous individuals away from telegraphy; by 1890, the negative impact of the telephone on telegraphy was already noticeable. The expiration of the main Bell telephone patents five years later intensified the decline of telegraphy, as many "independent" telephone companies were established, creating an extensive network of toll lines across Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and other states, offering cheap, instant communication without needing an operator.
It will be seen that the times have changed radically since Edison became a telegrapher, and that in this respect a chapter of electrical history has been definitely closed. There was a day when the art offered a distinct career to all of its practitioners, and young men of ambition and good family were eager to begin even as messenger boys, and were ready to undergo a severe ordeal of apprenticeship with the belief that they could ultimately attain positions of responsibility and profit. At the same time operators have always been shrewd enough to regard the telegraph as a stepping-stone to other careers in life. A bright fellow entering the telegraph service to-day finds the experience he may gain therein valuable, but he soon realizes that there are not enough good-paying official positions to "go around," so as to give each worthy man a chance after he has mastered the essentials of the art. He feels, therefore, that to remain at the key involves either stagnation or deterioration, and that after, say, twenty-five years of practice he will have lost ground as compared with friends who started out in other occupations. The craft of an operator, learned without much difficulty, is very attractive to a youth, but a position at the key is no place for a man of mature years. His services, with rare exceptions, grow less valuable as he advances in age and nervous strain breaks him down. On the contrary, men engaged in other professions find, as a rule, that they improve and advance with experience, and that age brings larger rewards and opportunities.
It's clear that times have changed drastically since Edison was a telegrapher, marking the end of an era in electrical history. There was a time when this field provided a clear career path for its workers, and ambitious young men from good families were eager to start as messenger boys, willing to endure a tough apprenticeship with the hope of eventually landing responsible and well-paying jobs. Meanwhile, operators have always been savvy enough to see the telegraph as a stepping stone to other careers. Today, a bright young person entering the telegraph service appreciates the experience they can gain, but quickly realizes that there aren't enough high-paying official positions available for everyone deserving after they've mastered the basics. They feel that staying at the key leads to either stagnation or decline, and that after, say, twenty-five years of experience, they will be at a disadvantage compared to friends who chose different paths. The skill of an operator is relatively easy to learn and seems appealing to a young person, but a role at the key isn’t suitable for someone older. With few exceptions, their work diminishes in value as they age, especially as the stress takes a toll on them. In contrast, people in other professions typically find that they grow and progress with experience, and that age brings greater rewards and opportunities.
The list of well-known Americans who have been graduates of the key is indeed an extraordinary one, and there is no department of our national life in which they have not distinguished themselves. The contrast, in this respect, between them and their European colleagues is highly significant. In Europe the telegraph systems are all under government management, the operators have strictly limited spheres of promotion, and at the best the transition from one kind of employment to another is not made so easily as in the New World. But in the United States we have seen Rufus Bullock become Governor of Georgia, and Ezra Cornell Governor of New York. Marshall Jewell was Postmaster-General of President Grant's Cabinet, and Daniel Lamont was Secretary of State in President Cleveland's. Gen. T. T. Eckert, past-President of the Western Union Telegraph Company, was Assistant Secretary of War under President Lincoln; and Robert J. Wynne, afterward a consul-general, served as Assistant Postmaster General. A very large proportion of the presidents and leading officials of the great railroad systems are old telegraphers, including Messrs. W. C. Brown, President of the New York Central Railroad, and Marvin Hughitt, President of the Chicago & North western Railroad. In industrial and financial life there have been Theodore N. Vail, President of the Bell telephone system; L. C. Weir, late President of the Adams Express; A. B. Chandler, President of the Postal Telegraph and Cable Company; Sir W. Van Home, identified with Canadian development; Robert C. Clowry, President of the Western Union Telegraph Company; D. H. Bates, Manager of the Baltimore & Ohio telegraph for Robert Garrett; and Andrew Carnegie, the greatest ironmaster the world has ever known, as well as its greatest philanthropist. In journalism there have been leaders like Edward Rosewater, founder of the Omaha Bee; W. J. Elverson, of the Philadelphia Press; and Frank A. Munsey, publisher of half a dozen big magazines. George Kennan has achieved fame in literature, and Guy Carleton and Harry de Souchet have been successful as dramatists. These are but typical of hundreds of men who could be named who have risen from work at the key to become recognized leaders in differing spheres of activity.
The list of famous Americans who graduated from working the telegraph is truly impressive, and there’s no area of our national life where they haven’t made their mark. The difference between them and their European counterparts is quite striking. In Europe, all telegraph systems are government-run, operators have very limited opportunities for advancement, and moving from one job to another is much harder than in the New World. In the United States, we’ve seen Rufus Bullock become Governor of Georgia and Ezra Cornell become Governor of New York. Marshall Jewell served as Postmaster-General in President Grant's Cabinet, and Daniel Lamont was Secretary of State under President Cleveland. Gen. T. T. Eckert, former president of the Western Union Telegraph Company, was Assistant Secretary of War under President Lincoln, and Robert J. Wynne, who later became a consul-general, served as Assistant Postmaster General. A large number of presidents and top officials of major railroad companies are former telegraphers, including W. C. Brown, President of the New York Central Railroad, and Marvin Hughitt, President of the Chicago & North Western Railroad. In the industrial and financial sectors, there have been figures like Theodore N. Vail, President of the Bell telephone system; L. C. Weir, former President of the Adams Express; A. B. Chandler, President of the Postal Telegraph and Cable Company; Sir W. Van Home, associated with Canadian development; Robert C. Clowry, President of the Western Union Telegraph Company; D. H. Bates, Manager of the Baltimore & Ohio telegraph for Robert Garrett; and Andrew Carnegie, the greatest ironmaster in history and an outstanding philanthropist. In journalism, notable leaders include Edward Rosewater, founder of the Omaha Bee; W. J. Elverson, of the Philadelphia Press; and Frank A. Munsey, publisher of several major magazines. George Kennan has gained recognition in literature, and Guy Carleton and Harry de Souchet have found success as playwrights. These are just a few examples of the many individuals who started working with the telegraph and went on to become acknowledged leaders in various fields.
But roving has never been favorable to the formation of steady habits. The young men who thus floated about the country from one telegraph office to another were often brilliant operators, noted for speed in sending and receiving, but they were undisciplined, were without the restraining influences of home life, and were so highly paid for their work that they could indulge freely in dissipation if inclined that way. Subjected to nervous tension for hours together at the key, many of them unfortunately took to drink, and having ended one engagement in a city by a debauch that closed the doors of the office to them, would drift away to the nearest town, and there securing work, would repeat the performance. At one time, indeed, these men were so numerous and so much in evidence as to constitute a type that the public was disposed to accept as representative of the telegraphic fraternity; but as the conditions creating him ceased to exist, the "tramp operator" also passed into history. It was, however, among such characters that Edison was very largely thrown in these early days of aimless drifting, to learn something perhaps of their nonchalant philosophy of life, sharing bed and board with them under all kinds of adverse conditions, but always maintaining a stoic abstemiousness, and never feeling other than a keen regret at the waste of so much genuine ability and kindliness on the part of those knights errant of the key whose inevitable fate might so easily have been his own.
But roaming around has never helped people develop steady habits. The young men who traveled from one telegraph office to another were often skilled operators, known for their speed in sending and receiving messages, but they were undisciplined, lacked the stabilizing influence of home life, and earned so much for their work that they could easily indulge in excess if they wanted to. Under constant nervous pressure while working the key for hours, many unfortunately turned to drinking, and after finishing one job in a city with a binge that closed the office doors to them, they would move on to the nearest town, find a new job, and repeat the cycle. At one point, these men were so numerous and so noticeable that the public began to see them as representative of the telegraphic community; but as the circumstances that created them disappeared, the "tramp operator" also faded from existence. However, it was amongst this crowd that Edison found himself frequently during those early, aimless days, learning perhaps something of their laid-back approach to life, sharing meals and lodging with them under all sorts of tough conditions, yet always maintaining a disciplined self-restraint and feeling nothing but a deep regret over the squandering of so much genuine talent and kindness from those wandering operators whose unavoidable fate could have easily been his own.
Such a class or group of men can always be presented by an individual type, and this is assuredly best embodied in Milton F. Adams, one of Edison's earliest and closest friends, to whom reference will be made in later chapters, and whose life has been so full of adventurous episodes that he might well be regarded as the modern Gil Blas. That career is certainly well worth the telling as "another story," to use the Kipling phrase. Of him Edison says: "Adams was one of a class of operators never satisfied to work at any place for any great length of time. He had the 'wanderlust.' After enjoying hospitality in Boston in 1868-69, on the floor of my hall-bedroom, which was a paradise for the entomologist, while the boarding-house itself was run on the banting system of flesh reduction, he came to me one day and said: 'Good-bye, Edison; I have got sixty cents, and I am going to San Francisco.' And he did go. How, I never knew personally. I learned afterward that he got a job there, and then within a week they had a telegraphers' strike. He got a big torch and sold patent medicine on the streets at night to support the strikers. Then he went to Peru as partner of a man who had a grizzly bear which they proposed entering against a bull in the bull-ring in that city. The grizzly was killed in five minutes, and so the scheme died. Then Adams crossed the Andes, and started a market-report bureau in Buenos Ayres. This didn't pay, so he started a restaurant in Pernambuco, Brazil. There he did very well, but something went wrong (as it always does to a nomad), so he went to the Transvaal, and ran a panorama called 'Paradise Lost' in the Kaffir kraals. This didn't pay, and he became the editor of a newspaper; then went to England to raise money for a railroad in Cape Colony. Next I heard of him in New York, having just arrived from Bogota, United States of Colombia, with a power of attorney and $2000 from a native of that republic, who had applied for a patent for tightening a belt to prevent it from slipping on a pulley—a device which he thought a new and great invention, but which was in use ever since machinery was invented. I gave Adams, then, a position as salesman for electrical apparatus. This he soon got tired of, and I lost sight of him." Adams, in speaking of this episode, says that when he asked for transportation expenses to St. Louis, Edison pulled out of his pocket a ferry ticket to Hoboken, and said to his associates: "I'll give him that, and he'll get there all right." This was in the early days of electric lighting; but down to the present moment the peregrinations of this versatile genius of the key have never ceased in one hemisphere or the other, so that as Mr. Adams himself remarked to the authors in April, 1908: "The life has been somewhat variegated, but never dull."
Such a class or group of men can always be represented by an individual type, and this is definitely best exemplified by Milton F. Adams, one of Edison's earliest and closest friends, who will be mentioned in later chapters, and whose life has been so full of adventurous episodes that he could easily be seen as the modern Gil Blas. His career is certainly worth recounting as "another story," to use Kipling's phrase. Edison said of him: "Adams was one of a class of operators who were never satisfied working in one place for too long. He had the 'wanderlust.' After enjoying hospitality in Boston in 1868-69, on the floor of my hall-bedroom, which was a paradise for entomologists, while the boarding house itself was running a diet plan to reduce flesh, he came to me one day and said: 'Goodbye, Edison; I have sixty cents, and I’m going to San Francisco.' And he really did go. How, I never found out. I later learned that he got a job there, and then within a week, they had a telegraphers' strike. He got a big torch and sold patent medicine on the streets at night to support the strikers. Then he went to Peru as a partner to a man who had a grizzly bear, which they planned to enter in a bullfight in that city. The grizzly was killed in five minutes, and so the whole idea fell apart. Then Adams crossed the Andes and started a market-report bureau in Buenos Aires. This didn’t pay off, so he opened a restaurant in Pernambuco, Brazil. He did very well there, but something went wrong (as it always does for a nomad), so he moved to the Transvaal and ran a panorama called 'Paradise Lost' in the Kaffir kraals. This didn’t pay either, and he became the editor of a newspaper; then he went to England to raise money for a railroad in Cape Colony. The next I heard of him, he was in New York, having just arrived from Bogota, Colombia, with a power of attorney and $2000 from a local resident who had applied for a patent for tightening a belt to keep it from slipping on a pulley—a device he thought was a new and great invention but had been in use since machinery was first created. I then offered Adams a job as a salesman for electrical equipment. He quickly tired of this, and I lost track of him." Adams, reflecting on this episode, said that when he asked for transportation expenses to St. Louis, Edison pulled out a ferry ticket to Hoboken and told his associates: "I'll give him that, and he'll get there just fine." This was during the early days of electric lighting; but even now, the travels of this versatile genius of the telegraph haven't stopped in one hemisphere or the other, as Mr. Adams himself remarked to us in April 1908: "Life has been pretty varied, but never dull."
The fact remains also that throughout this period Edison, while himself a very Ishmael, never ceased to study, explore, experiment. Referring to this beginning of his career, he mentions a curious fact that throws light on his ceaseless application. "After I became a telegraph operator," he says, "I practiced for a long time to become a rapid reader of print, and got so expert I could sense the meaning of a whole line at once. This faculty, I believe, should be taught in schools, as it appears to be easily acquired. Then one can read two or three books in a day, whereas if each word at a time only is sensed, reading is laborious."
The fact is that during this time, Edison, who was very much an outsider, never stopped studying, exploring, and experimenting. Looking back at the start of his career, he mentions an interesting fact that highlights his constant effort. "After I became a telegraph operator," he says, "I practiced for a long time to become a fast reader and got so good that I could understand the meaning of an entire line at once. I believe this skill should be taught in schools since it seems pretty easy to learn. Then, you can read two or three books in a day, while if you only focus on each word separately, reading becomes a tiring chore."
CHAPTER V
ARDUOUS YEARS IN THE CENTRAL WEST
IN 1903, when accepting the position of honorary electrician to the International Exposition held in St. Louis in 1904, to commemorate the centenary of the Louisiana Purchase, Mr. Edison spoke in his letter of the Central West as a "region where as a young telegraph operator I spent many arduous years before moving East." The term of probation thus referred to did not end until 1868, and while it lasted Edison's wanderings carried him from Detroit to New Orleans, and took him, among other cities, to Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Louisville, and Memphis, some of which he visited twice in his peregrinations to secure work. From Canada, after the episodes noted in the last chapter, he went to Adrian, Michigan, and of what happened there Edison tells a story typical of his wanderings for several years to come. "After leaving my first job at Stratford Junction, I got a position as operator on the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern at Adrian, Michigan, in the division superintendent's office. As usual, I took the 'night trick,' which most operators disliked, but which I preferred, as it gave me more leisure to experiment. I had obtained from the station agent a small room, and had established a little shop of my own. One day the day operator wanted to get off, and I was on duty. About 9 o'clock the superintendent handed me a despatch which he said was very important, and which I must get off at once. The wire at the time was very busy, and I asked if I should break in. I got orders to do so, and acting under those orders of the superintendent, I broke in and tried to send the despatch; but the other operator would not permit it, and the struggle continued for ten minutes. Finally I got possession of the wire and sent the message. The superintendent of telegraph, who then lived in Adrian and went to his office in Toledo every day, happened that day to be in the Western Union office up-town—and it was the superintendent I was really struggling with! In about twenty minutes he arrived livid with rage, and I was discharged on the spot. I informed him that the general superintendent had told me to break in and send the despatch, but the general superintendent then and there repudiated the whole thing. Their families were socially close, so I was sacrificed. My faith in human nature got a slight jar."
IN 1903, while accepting the honorary electrician position for the International Exposition taking place in St. Louis in 1904 to celebrate the centennial of the Louisiana Purchase, Mr. Edison mentioned in his letter that the Central West was a "region where as a young telegraph operator I spent many tough years before moving East." The period he referred to didn't end until 1868, and during that time, Edison's travels took him from Detroit to New Orleans, and included cities like Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Louisville, and Memphis, some of which he visited twice in his quest for work. After the events detailed in the last chapter, he went to Adrian, Michigan, and he shares a story from that time that captures the essence of his travels for years to come. "After leaving my first job at Stratford Junction, I got a position as an operator with the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern at Adrian, Michigan, in the division superintendent's office. As usual, I took the 'night shift,' which most operators disliked, but I preferred it since it gave me more time to experiment. I managed to get a small room from the station agent and set up a little workshop of my own. One day, the day operator needed to take time off while I was on duty. Around 9 o'clock, the superintendent handed me a dispatch he said was very important and that I needed to send immediately. The wire was very busy at that moment, and I asked if I should break in. I was given the go-ahead to do so, and following those orders from the superintendent, I broke in and attempted to send the dispatch; however, the other operator wouldn’t let me, and we battled for ten minutes. Eventually, I gained control of the wire and sent the message. The telegraph superintendent, who lived in Adrian and commuted to his office in Toledo daily, happened to be at the Western Union office uptown that day—and it was him I had been fighting against! About twenty minutes later, he stormed in, furious, and I was fired on the spot. I informed him that the general superintendent had instructed me to break in and send the dispatch, but the general superintendent quickly denied all of it. Their families were socially connected, so I was made the scapegoat. My trust in people took a hit."
Edison then went to Toledo and secured a position at Fort Wayne, on the Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad, now leased to the Pennsylvania system. This was a "day job," and he did not like it. He drifted two months later to Indianapolis, arriving there in the fall of 1864, when he was at first assigned to duty at the Union Station at a salary of $75 a month for the Western Union Telegraph Company, whose service he now entered, and with which he has been destined to maintain highly important and close relationships throughout a large part of his life. Superintendent Wallick appears to have treated him generously and to have loaned him instruments, a kindness that was greatly appreciated, for twenty years later the inventor called on his old employer, and together they visited the scene where the borrowed apparatus had been mounted on a rough board in the depot. Edison did not stay long in Indianapolis, however, resigning in February, 1865, and proceeding to Cincinnati. The transfer was possibly due to trouble caused by one of his early inventions embodying what has been characterized by an expert as "probably the most simple and ingenious arrangement of connections for a repeater." His ambition was to take "press report," but finding, even after considerable practice, that he "broke" frequently, he adjusted two embossing Morse registers—one to receive the press matter, and the other to repeat the dots and dashes at a lower speed, so that the message could be copied leisurely. Hence he could not be rushed or "broken" in receiving, while he could turn out "copy" that was a marvel of neatness and clearness. All was well so long as ordinary conditions prevailed, but when an unusual pressure occurred the little system fell behind, and the newspapers complained of the slowness with which reports were delivered to them. It is easy to understand that with matter received at a rate of forty words per minute and worked off at twenty-five words per minute a serious congestion or delay would result, and the newspapers were more anxious for the news than they were for fine penmanship.
Edison then went to Toledo and got a job at Fort Wayne on the Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad, which is now leased to the Pennsylvania system. This was a "day job," and he didn't like it. He moved on two months later to Indianapolis, arriving there in the fall of 1864, where he was first assigned to work at the Union Station with a salary of $75 a month for the Western Union Telegraph Company, whose service he entered and would maintain important and close relationships with throughout much of his life. Superintendent Wallick seemed to treat him generously and lent him equipment, a kindness he greatly appreciated. Twenty years later, the inventor visited his old employer, and they went together to the place where the borrowed equipment had been set up on a rough board in the depot. However, Edison didn’t stay long in Indianapolis, resigning in February 1865 and moving to Cincinnati. The transfer was possibly due to issues caused by one of his early inventions, which an expert described as "probably the most simple and ingenious arrangement of connections for a repeater." He wanted to take "press report," but after considerable practice found that he frequently "broke," so he adjusted two embossing Morse registers—one to receive the press material and the other to repeat the dots and dashes at a slower speed, allowing the message to be copied at a comfortable pace. This way, he couldn’t be rushed or "broken" while he could produce "copy" that was impressively neat and clear. Everything was fine as long as conditions were normal, but when there was unusual demand, his little system fell behind, and newspapers complained about the slow delivery of their reports. It's easy to see that when material came in at forty words per minute but got processed at twenty-five words per minute, serious congestion or delays would happen, and the newspapers were more eager for the news than for perfect handwriting.
Of this device Mr. Edison remarks: "Together we took press for several nights, my companion keeping the apparatus in adjustment and I copying. The regular press operator would go to the theatre or take a nap, only finishing the report after 1 A.M. One of the newspapers complained of bad copy toward the end of the report—that, is from 1 to 3 A.M., and requested that the operator taking the report up to 1 A.M.—which was ourselves—take it all, as the copy then was perfectly unobjectionable. This led to an investigation by the manager, and the scheme was forbidden.
Of this device, Mr. Edison says: "We worked the press together for several nights, my partner keeping the equipment adjusted while I did the copying. The regular press operator would go to the theater or take a nap, finishing the report only after 1 A.M. One newspaper complained about the poor quality of the copy toward the end of the report—from 1 to 3 A.M.—and requested that the operator who took the report up to 1 A.M.—which was us—handle it all, since the copy before then was perfectly fine. This led to an investigation by the manager, and the plan was banned."
"This instrument, many years afterward, was applied by me for transferring messages from one wire to any other wire simultaneously, or after any interval of time. It consisted of a disk of paper, the indentations being formed in a volute spiral, exactly as in the disk phonograph to-day. It was this instrument which gave me the idea of the phonograph while working on the telephone."
"This device, many years later, was used by me to transfer messages from one wire to another wire at the same time or after a certain period. It was made up of a disk of paper, with the impressions arranged in a spiral pattern, just like in today’s phonograph. It was this device that inspired the idea for the phonograph while I was working on the telephone."
Arrived in Cincinnati, where he got employment in the Western Union commercial telegraph department at a wage of $60 per month, Edison made the acquaintance of Milton F. Adams, already referred to as facile princeps the typical telegrapher in all his more sociable and brilliant aspects. Speaking of that time, Mr. Adams says: "I can well recall when Edison drifted in to take a job. He was a youth of about eighteen years, decidedly unprepossessing in dress and rather uncouth in manner. I was twenty-one, and very dudish. He was quite thin in those days, and his nose was very prominent, giving a Napoleonic look to his face, although the curious resemblance did not strike me at the time. The boys did not take to him cheerfully, and he was lonesome. I sympathized with him, and we became close companions. As an operator he had no superiors and very few equals. Most of the time he was monkeying with the batteries and circuits, and devising things to make the work of telegraphy less irksome. He also relieved the monotony of office-work by fitting up the battery circuits to play jokes on his fellow-operators, and to deal with the vermin that infested the premises. He arranged in the cellar what he called his 'rat paralyzer,' a very simple contrivance consisting of two plates insulated from each other and connected with the main battery. They were so placed that when a rat passed over them the fore feet on the one plate and the hind feet on the other completed the circuit and the rat departed this life, electrocuted."
Arriving in Cincinnati, where he found a job in the Western Union commercial telegraph department for $60 a month, Edison met Milton F. Adams, who was recognized as the quintessential telegrapher in his more social and impressive aspects. Reflecting on that time, Mr. Adams says: "I can clearly remember when Edison came in to take a job. He was about eighteen years old, not very attractive in his clothes and somewhat awkward in manner. I was twenty-one and quite dapper. Back then, he was pretty thin, and he had a prominent nose that gave his face a Napoleonic appearance, although I didn’t notice the resemblance at the time. The other guys weren't very friendly toward him, and he felt lonely. I felt for him, and we became good friends. As an operator, he had no peers and very few equals. Most of the time, he was tinkering with the batteries and circuits, coming up with ways to make telegraphy less tedious. He also broke up the monotony of office work by setting up battery circuits to play pranks on his fellow operators and deal with the pests that plagued the place. In the basement, he set up what he called his 'rat paralyzer,' a simple device made of two plates insulated from each other and connected to the main battery. They were positioned so that when a rat walked over them, its front paws on one plate and hind paws on the other completed the circuit, and the rat met its end, electrocuted."
Shortly after Edison's arrival at Cincinnati came the close of the Civil War and the assassination of President Lincoln. It was natural that telegraphers should take an intense interest in the general struggle, for not only did they handle all the news relating to it, but many of them were at one time or another personal participants. For example, one of the operators in the Cincinnati office was George Ellsworth, who was telegrapher for Morgan, the famous Southern Guerrilla, and was with him when he made his raid into Ohio and was captured near the Pennsylvania line. Ellsworth himself made a narrow escape by swimming the Ohio River with the aid of an army mule. Yet we can well appreciate the unimpressionable way in which some of the men did their work, from an anecdote that Mr. Edison tells of that awful night of Friday, April 14, 1865: "I noticed," he says, "an immense crowd gathering in the street outside a newspaper office. I called the attention of the other operators to the crowd, and we sent a messenger boy to find the cause of the excitement. He returned in a few minutes and shouted 'Lincoln's shot.' Instinctively the operators looked from one face to another to see which man had received the news. All the faces were blank, and every man said he had not taken a word about the shooting. 'Look over your files,' said the boss to the man handling the press stuff. For a few moments we waited in suspense, and then the man held up a sheet of paper containing a short account of the shooting of the President. The operator had worked so mechanically that he had handled the news without the slightest knowledge of its significance." Mr. Adams says that at the time the city was en fete on account of the close of the war, the name of the assassin was received by telegraph, and it was noted with a thrill of horror that it was that of a brother of Edwin Booth and of Junius Brutus Booth—the latter of whom was then playing at the old National Theatre. Booth was hurried away into seclusion, and the next morning the city that had been so gay over night with bunting was draped with mourning.
Shortly after Edison arrived in Cincinnati, the Civil War ended and President Lincoln was assassinated. It was only natural for telegraphers to be deeply interested in the conflict, as they managed all the news about it, and many had personal experiences tied to the events. For instance, one of the operators in the Cincinnati office was George Ellsworth, who was the telegrapher for Morgan, the notorious Southern Guerrilla, and was with him during his raid into Ohio, where he was captured near the Pennsylvania line. Ellsworth managed a narrow escape by swimming across the Ohio River with the help of an army mule. However, we can understand the unfazed manner in which some of the operators did their work from an anecdote that Edison shares about that terrible night of Friday, April 14, 1865: “I noticed,” he recalls, “a huge crowd gathering in front of a newspaper office. I pointed out the crowd to the other operators, and we sent a messenger boy to find out what was happening. He returned a few minutes later, shouting, ‘Lincoln’s shot.’ Instinctively, the operators looked at each other to see who had heard the news first. All the faces were blank, and every man said he hadn’t taken a word about the shooting. ‘Check your files,’ the boss instructed the operator in charge of the press material. We waited in suspense for a few moments, and then the operator held up a sheet of paper with a brief report on the shooting of the President. The operator had worked so mechanically that he had processed the news without any awareness of its significance.” Mr. Adams states that at the time, the city was in celebration due to the war's end, and the name of the assassin was transmitted by telegraph. It was chilling to learn that he was the brother of Edwin Booth and Junius Brutus Booth—the latter who was performing at the old National Theatre. Booth was quickly taken into hiding, and the next morning, the city that had been so festive the night before, adorned with bunting, was draped in mourning.
Edison's diversions in Cincinnati were chiefly those already observed. He read a great deal, but spent most of his leisure in experiment. Mr. Adams remarks: "Edison and I were very fond of tragedy. Forrest and John McCullough were playing at the National Theatre, and when our capital was sufficient we would go to see those eminent tragedians alternate in Othello and Iago. Edison always enjoyed Othello greatly. Aside from an occasional visit to the Loewen Garden 'over the Rhine,' with a glass of beer and a few pretzels, consumed while listening to the excellent music of a German band, the theatre was the sum and substance of our innocent dissipation."
Edison's pastimes in Cincinnati were mainly what we've already mentioned. He read a lot, but most of his free time was spent experimenting. Mr. Adams notes, "Edison and I really loved tragedy. Forrest and John McCullough were performing at the National Theatre, and when we had enough money, we'd go see those great actors switch roles between Othello and Iago. Edison always really enjoyed Othello. Besides an occasional visit to the Loewen Garden 'over the Rhine,' where we'd have a beer and some pretzels while listening to a fantastic German band, the theater was the center of our simple entertainment."
The Cincinnati office, as a central point, appears to have been attractive to many of the clever young operators who graduated from it to positions of larger responsibility. Some of them were conspicuous for their skill and versatility. Mr. Adams tells this interesting story as an illustration: "L. C. Weir, or Charlie, as he was known, at that time agent for the Adams Express Company, had the remarkable ability of taking messages and copying them twenty-five words behind the sender. One day he came into the operating-room, and passing a table he heard Louisville calling Cincinnati. He reached over to the key and answered the call. My attention was arrested by the fact that he walked off after responding, and the sender happened to be a good one. Weir coolly asked for a pen, and when he sat down the sender was just one message ahead of him with date, address, and signature. Charlie started in, and in a beautiful, large, round hand copied that message. The sender went right along, and when he finished with six messages closed his key. When Weir had done with the last one the sender began to think that after all there had been no receiver, as Weir did not 'break,' but simply gave his O. K. He afterward became president of the Adams Express, and was certainly a wonderful operator." The operating-room referred to was on the fifth floor of the building with no elevators.
The Cincinnati office, as a central hub, seems to have attracted many smart young operators who moved on to more prominent roles. Some of them stood out for their expertise and adaptability. Mr. Adams shares this fascinating story as an example: "L. C. Weir, or Charlie, as he was known, was at the time the agent for the Adams Express Company and had the incredible knack for taking messages while copying them twenty-five words behind the sender. One day he walked into the operating room, and as he passed a table, he heard Louisville calling Cincinnati. He reached over to the key and answered the call. I noticed that he just walked away after responding, and the sender happened to be very good. Weir calmly asked for a pen, and when he sat down, the sender was just one message ahead of him with the date, address, and signature. Charlie started copying the message in a beautiful, large, round handwriting. The sender continued, and when he finished with six messages, he closed his key. By the time Weir finished the last one, the sender began to wonder if there had been any receiver at all, as Weir didn't 'break' but simply gave his O.K. He later became the president of Adams Express and was definitely a remarkable operator." The operating room mentioned was on the fifth floor of the building with no elevators.
Those were the early days of trade unionism in telegraphy, and the movement will probably never quite die out in the craft which has always shown so much solidarity. While Edison was in Cincinnati a delegation of five union operators went over from Cleveland to form a local branch, and the occasion was one of great conviviality. Night came, but the unionists were conspicuous by their absence, although more circuits than one were intolerant of delay and clamorous for attention—-eight local unionists being away. The Cleveland report wire was in special need, and Edison, almost alone in the office, devoted himself to it all through the night and until 3 o'clock the next morning, when he was relieved.
Those were the early days of trade unionism in telegraphy, and the movement will probably never completely fade away in a field that has always shown such strong unity. While Edison was in Cincinnati, a group of five union operators traveled from Cleveland to establish a local branch, and it was a time of great celebration. Night fell, but the union members were noticeably missing, even though several lines were stressing for service and demanding attention—eight local union members were absent. The Cleveland report wire needed immediate assistance, and Edison, almost alone in the office, focused on it throughout the night and until 3 o'clock the next morning, when he finally received relief.
He had previously been getting $80 a month, and had eked this out by copying plays for the theatre. His rating was that of a "plug" or inferior operator; but he was determined to lift himself into the class of first-class operators, and had kept up the practice of going to the office at night to "copy press," acting willingly as a substitute for any operator who wanted to get off for a few hours—which often meant all night. Speaking of this special ordeal, for which he had thus been unconsciously preparing, Edison says: "My copy looked fine if viewed as a whole, as I could write a perfectly straight line across the wide sheet, which was not ruled. There were no flourishes, but the individual letters would not bear close inspection. When I missed understanding a word, there was no time to think what it was, so I made an illegible one to fill in, trusting to the printers to sense it. I knew they could read anything, although Mr. Bloss, an editor of the Inquirer, made such bad copy that one of his editorials was pasted up on the notice-board in the telegraph office with an offer of one dollar to any man who could 'read twenty consecutive words.' Nobody ever did it. When I got through I was too nervous to go home, so waited the rest of the night for the day manager, Mr. Stevens, to see what was to be the outcome of this Union formation and of my efforts. He was an austere man, and I was afraid of him. I got the morning papers, which came out at 4 A. M., and the press report read perfectly, which surprised me greatly. I went to work on my regular day wire to Portsmouth, Ohio, and there was considerable excitement, but nothing was said to me, neither did Mr. Stevens examine the copy on the office hook, which I was watching with great interest. However, about 3 P. M. he went to the hook, grabbed the bunch and looked at it as a whole without examining it in detail, for which I was thankful. Then he jabbed it back on the hook, and I knew I was all right. He walked over to me, and said: 'Young man, I want you to work the Louisville wire nights; your salary will be $125.' Thus I got from the plug classification to that of a 'first-class man.'"
He had been making $80 a month and stretched this by copying plays for the theater. His status was that of a "plug" or lower-tier operator; however, he was determined to move up to the level of first-class operators and kept practicing by going to the office at night to "copy press," willingly filling in for any operator who wanted to take a few hours off — which often meant staying all night. Referring to this particular challenge, for which he had unknowingly been preparing, Edison said: "My copy looked good overall, as I could write a perfectly straight line across the wide, unruled sheet. There were no flourishes, but the individual letters wouldn't hold up under close scrutiny. When I didn't understand a word, there was no time to think about what it was, so I would write an unreadable one to fill in, hoping the printers would figure it out. I knew they could read anything, although Mr. Bloss, an editor at the Inquirer, produced such terrible copy that one of his editorials was posted in the telegraph office with a $1 reward for anyone who could read twenty consecutive words. Nobody ever managed it. When I finished, I was too anxious to go home, so I waited the rest of the night for the day manager, Mr. Stevens, to see what would come of this Union formation and my efforts. He was a stern man, and I was intimidated by him. I received the morning papers, which came out at 4 A.M., and the press report was flawless, which surprised me a lot. I worked on my regular day wire to Portsmouth, Ohio, where there was quite a bit of excitement, but nobody said anything to me, nor did Mr. Stevens check the copy on the office hook, which I was watching intently. However, around 3 P.M., he went to the hook, grabbed the bunch, and looked at it as a whole without examining it closely, for which I was grateful. Then he shoved it back on the hook, and I knew I was in the clear. He walked over to me and said: 'Young man, I want you to handle the Louisville wire at night; your salary will be $125.' That's how I moved up from the plug classification to that of a 'first-class man.'"
But no sooner was this promotion secured than he started again on his wanderings southward, while his friend Adams went North, neither having any difficulty in making the trip. "The boys in those days had extraordinary facilities for travel. As a usual thing it was only necessary for them to board a train and tell the conductor they were operators. Then they would go as far as they liked. The number of operators was small, and they were in demand everywhere." It was in this way Edison made his way south as far as Memphis, Tennessee, where the telegraph service at that time was under military law, although the operators received $125 a month. Here again Edison began to invent and improve on existing apparatus, with the result of having once more to "move on." The story may be told in his own terse language: "I was not the inventor of the auto repeater, but while in Memphis I worked on one. Learning that the chief operator, who was a protege of the superintendent, was trying in some way to put New York and New Orleans together for the first time since the close of the war, I redoubled my efforts, and at 2 o'clock one morning I had them speaking to each other. The office of the Memphis Avalanche was in the same building. The paper got wind of it and sent messages. A column came out in the morning about it; but when I went to the office in the afternoon to report for duty I was discharged with out explanation. The superintendent would not even give me a pass to Nashville, so I had to pay my fare. I had so little money left that I nearly starved at Decatur, Alabama, and had to stay three days before going on north to Nashville. Arrived in that city, I went to the telegraph office, got money enough to buy a little solid food, and secured a pass to Louisville. I had a companion with me who was also out of a job. I arrived at Louisville on a bitterly cold day, with ice in the gutters. I was wearing a linen duster and was not much to look at, but got a position at once, working on a press wire. My travelling companion was less successful on account of his 'record.' They had a limit even in those days when the telegraph service was so demoralized."
But as soon as he secured this promotion, he set off again on his journey south while his friend Adams headed north. Both had no trouble making the trip. "Back then, the guys had amazing travel options. Typically, they just needed to hop on a train and tell the conductor they were operators. Then they could go wherever they wanted. There weren’t many operators, and they were needed everywhere." This is how Edison made his way down to Memphis, Tennessee, where the telegraph service was under military law, even though the operators earned $125 a month. Again, Edison began inventing and improving existing equipment, leading to yet another need to "move on." He recounted the experience in his own straightforward way: "I wasn't the inventor of the auto repeater, but while I was in Memphis, I worked on one. When I learned that the chief operator, a favorite of the superintendent, was trying to connect New York and New Orleans for the first time since the war ended, I intensified my efforts, and at 2 o’clock one morning, I had them communicating. The Memphis Avalanche office was in the same building. The paper found out about it and sent messages. A column was published about it the next morning; however, when I went to the office in the afternoon to start my shift, I was let go without any explanation. The superintendent wouldn’t even give me a pass to Nashville, so I had to pay my own way. I had so little money left that I nearly starved in Decatur, Alabama, and had to wait three days before continuing north to Nashville. Once I arrived in that city, I went to the telegraph office, got enough money to buy some basic food, and got a pass to Louisville. I had a friend with me who was also out of work. I reached Louisville on a freezing cold day, with ice in the gutters. I was wearing a linen duster and didn’t look great, but I found a job immediately working on a press wire. My traveling companion wasn’t as lucky because of his 'record.' Even back then, they had limits when the telegraph service was so disorganized."
Some reminiscences of Mr. Edison are of interest as bearing not only upon the "demoralized" telegraph service, but the conditions from which the New South had to emerge while working out its salvation. "The telegraph was still under military control, not having been turned over to the original owners, the Southern Telegraph Company. In addition to the regular force, there was an extra force of two or three operators, and some stranded ones, who were a burden to us, for board was high. One of these derelicts was a great source of worry to me, personally. He would come in at all hours and either throw ink around or make a lot of noise. One night he built a fire in the grate and started to throw pistol cartridges into the flames. These would explode, and I was twice hit by the bullets, which left a black-and-blue mark. Another night he came in and got from some part of the building a lot of stationery with 'Confederate States' printed at the head. He was a fine operator, and wrote a beautiful hand. He would take a sheet of this paper, write capital 'A', and then take another sheet and make the 'A' differently; and so on through the alphabet; each time crumpling the paper up in his hand and throwing it on the floor. He would keep this up until the room was filled nearly flush with the table. Then he would quit.
Some memories of Mr. Edison are interesting because they reflect not only the "demoralized" telegraph service but also the conditions the New South had to overcome while finding its way back. "The telegraph was still under military control, having not been returned to its original owners, the Southern Telegraph Company. In addition to the regular staff, there was an extra team of two or three operators, and some stragglers who were a burden to us since the cost of board was high. One of these lost souls was a constant source of stress for me personally. He would come in at all hours and either get ink everywhere or make a lot of noise. One night he built a fire in the grate and started throwing pistol cartridges into the flames. They would explode, and I was hit by the bullets twice, leaving me with bruises. Another night he came in and took a bunch of stationery with 'Confederate States' printed at the top from somewhere in the building. He was a skilled operator and had beautiful handwriting. He would take a sheet of this paper, write a capital 'A', then take another sheet and write the 'A' differently; and he continued through the alphabet, crumpling up the paper and throwing it on the floor each time. He would keep this up until the room was nearly filled to the level of the table. Then he would stop."
"Everything at that time was 'wide open.' Disorganization reigned supreme. There was no head to anything. At night myself and a companion would go over to a gorgeously furnished faro-bank and get our midnight lunch. Everything was free. There were over twenty keno-rooms running. One of them that I visited was in a Baptist church, the man with the wheel being in the pulpit, and the gamblers in the pews.
"Everything back then was 'wide open.' Disorganization was everywhere. There was no leader for anything. At night, my friend and I would head over to a beautifully furnished faro bank for our midnight meal. Everything was free. There were more than twenty keno rooms operating. One of them that I went to was in a Baptist church, with the dealer in the pulpit and the gamblers in the pews."
"While there the manager of the telegraph office was arrested for something I never understood, and incarcerated in a military prison about half a mile from the office. The building was in plain sight from the office, and four stories high. He was kept strictly incommunicado. One day, thinking he might be confined in a room facing the office, I put my arm out of the window and kept signalling dots and dashes by the movement of the arm. I tried this several times for two days. Finally he noticed it, and putting his arm through the bars of the window he established communication with me. He thus sent several messages to his friends, and was afterward set free."
"While I was there, the manager of the telegraph office was arrested for something I never understood and locked up in a military prison about half a mile from the office. The building was clearly visible from the office and was four stories tall. He was kept in complete isolation. One day, thinking he might be in a room facing the office, I stuck my arm out of the window and started signaling dots and dashes with my arm movements. I tried this several times over two days. Finally, he noticed it, and reaching his arm through the bars of the window, he established communication with me. He sent several messages to his friends and was later released."
Another curious story told by Edison concerns a fellow-operator on night duty at Chattanooga Junction, at the time he was at Memphis: "When it was reported that Hood was marching on Nashville, one night a Jew came into the office about 11 o'clock in great excitement, having heard the Hood rumor. He, being a large sutler, wanted to send a message to save his goods. The operator said it was impossible—that orders had been given to send no private messages. Then the Jew wanted to bribe my friend, who steadfastly refused for the reason, as he told the Jew, that he might be court-martialled and shot. Finally the Jew got up to $800. The operator swore him to secrecy and sent the message. Now there was no such order about private messages, and the Jew, finding it out, complained to Captain Van Duzer, chief of telegraphs, who investigated the matter, and while he would not discharge the operator, laid him off indefinitely. Van Duzer was so lenient that if an operator were discharged, all the operator had to do was to wait three days and then go and sit on the stoop of Van Duzer's office all day, and he would be taken back. But Van Duzer swore he would never give in in this case. He said that if the operator had taken $800 and sent the message at the regular rate, which was twenty-five cents, it would have been all right, as the Jew would be punished for trying to bribe a military operator; but when the operator took the $800 and then sent the message deadhead, he couldn't stand it, and he would never relent."
Another interesting story told by Edison is about a fellow operator on night duty at Chattanooga Junction while he was in Memphis: "When it was rumored that Hood was marching on Nashville, a Jewish man came into the office around 11 o'clock, extremely agitated after hearing the rumor about Hood. He was a large sutler and wanted to send a message to protect his goods. The operator said that was impossible because orders had been given not to send private messages. Then the Jewish man tried to bribe my friend, who firmly declined, explaining to the Jew that he could be court-martialed and shot. Eventually, the Jew offered $800. The operator made him promise to keep it a secret and sent the message. There was actually no order against private messages, and when the Jew found out, he complained to Captain Van Duzer, the chief of telegraphs, who looked into the issue. While he didn't fire the operator, he suspended him indefinitely. Van Duzer was quite lenient; if an operator got fired, all they had to do was wait three days and then sit on the steps of Van Duzer's office all day, and he would take them back. But Van Duzer insisted he wouldn't give in this time. He stated that if the operator had taken the $800 and sent the message at the normal rate, which was twenty-five cents, it would have been acceptable, as the Jew would be punished for attempting to bribe a military operator. However, when the operator accepted the $800 and then sent the message for free, he couldn't accept that, and he would never back down."
A third typical story of this period deals with a cipher message for Thomas. Mr. Edison narrates it as follows: "When I was an operator in Cincinnati working the Louisville wire nights for a time, one night a man over on the Pittsburg wire yelled out: 'D. I. cipher,' which meant that there was a cipher message from the War Department at Washington and that it was coming—and he yelled out 'Louisville.' I started immediately to call up that place. It was just at the change of shift in the office. I could not get Louisville, and the cipher message began to come. It was taken by the operator on the other table direct from the War Department. It was for General Thomas, at Nashville. I called for about twenty minutes and notified them that I could not get Louisville. I kept at it for about fifteen minutes longer, and notified them that there was still no answer from Louisville. They then notified the War Department that they could not get Louisville. Then we tried to get it by all kinds of roundabout ways, but in no case could anybody get them at that office. Soon a message came from the War Department to send immediately for the manager of the Cincinnati office. He was brought to the office and several messages were exchanged, the contents of which, of course, I did not know, but the matter appeared to be very serious, as they were afraid of General Hood, of the Confederate Army, who was then attempting to march on Nashville; and it was very important that this cipher of about twelve hundred words or so should be got through immediately to General Thomas. I kept on calling up to 12 or 1 o'clock, but no Louisville. About 1 o'clock the operator at the Indianapolis office got hold of an operator on a wire which ran from Indianapolis to Louisville along the railroad, who happened to come into his office. He arranged with this operator to get a relay of horses, and the message was sent through Indianapolis to this operator who had engaged horses to carry the despatches to Louisville and find out the trouble, and get the despatches through without delay to General Thomas. In those days the telegraph fraternity was rather demoralized, and the discipline was very lax. It was found out a couple of days afterward that there were three night operators at Louisville. One of them had gone over to Jeffersonville and had fallen off a horse and broken his leg, and was in a hospital. By a remarkable coincidence another of the men had been stabbed in a keno-room, and was also in hospital while the third operator had gone to Cynthiana to see a man hanged and had got left by the train."
A typical story from this time involves a cipher message for Thomas. Mr. Edison tells it like this: "When I was working as an operator in Cincinnati, handling the Louisville wire at night for a while, one night a guy on the Pittsburg wire shouted, 'D. I. cipher,' which meant there was a cipher message from the War Department in Washington coming in—and he shouted 'Louisville.' I immediately started trying to reach that place. It was just at the change of shifts in the office. I couldn’t get through to Louisville, and the cipher message started coming in. The operator at the other table took it directly from the War Department. It was meant for General Thomas in Nashville. I called for about twenty minutes and let them know I couldn’t reach Louisville. I kept trying for another fifteen minutes and reported that there was still no answer. They then informed the War Department that they couldn’t get through to Louisville. We tried every possible route, but nobody could connect with that office. Soon, the War Department sent a message asking for the manager of the Cincinnati office to come in urgently. He was brought in, and several messages were exchanged; I didn’t know the details, but it seemed very serious since they were worried about General Hood from the Confederate Army, who was trying to march on Nashville. It was crucial that this cipher of about twelve hundred words got through to General Thomas right away. I kept trying until about midnight or 1 AM, but still no Louisville. Around 1 AM, the operator in Indianapolis connected with an operator on a wire running from Indianapolis to Louisville along the railroad, who happened to walk into his office. He made arrangements with this operator for a relay of horses, and the message was sent through Indianapolis to this operator who had hired horses to carry the messages to Louisville, find out what was wrong, and get the messages through to General Thomas without delay. Back then, the telegraph community was a bit chaotic, and the discipline was quite lax. A couple of days later, it became clear that there were three night operators in Louisville. One had gone over to Jeffersonville and fallen off a horse, breaking his leg, and ended up in a hospital. By a strange coincidence, another one had been stabbed in a keno room and was also in the hospital, while the third operator had gone to Cynthiana to see someone hanged and got left behind by the train."
I think the most important line of investigation is the production of Electricity direct from carbon. Edison
I believe the most crucial area of research is generating Electricity directly from carbon. Edison
Young Edison remained in Louisville for about two years, quite a long stay for one with such nomadic instincts. It was there that he perfected the peculiar vertical style of writing which, beginning with him in telegraphy, later became so much of a fad with teachers of penmanship and in the schools. He says of this form of writing, a current example of which is given above: "I developed this style in Louisville while taking press reports. My wire was connected to the 'blind' side of a repeater at Cincinnati, so that if I missed a word or sentence, or if the wire worked badly, I could not break in and get the last words, because the Cincinnati man had no instrument by which he could hear me. I had to take what came. When I got the job, the cable across the Ohio River at Covington, connecting with the line to Louisville, had a variable leak in it, which caused the strength of the signalling current to make violent fluctuations. I obviated this by using several relays, each with a different adjustment, working several sounders all connected with one sounding-plate. The clatter was bad, but I could read it with fair ease. When, in addition to this infernal leak, the wires north to Cleveland worked badly, it required a large amount of imagination to get the sense of what was being sent. An imagination requires an appreciable time for its exercise, and as the stuff was coming at the rate of thirty-five to forty words a minute, it was very difficult to write down what was coming and imagine what wasn't coming. Hence it was necessary to become a very rapid writer, so I started to find the fastest style. I found that the vertical style, with each letter separate and without any flourishes, was the most rapid, and that the smaller the letter the greater the rapidity. As I took on an average from eight to fifteen columns of news report every day, it did not take long to perfect this method." Mr. Edison has adhered to this characteristic style of penmanship down to the present time.
Young Edison stayed in Louisville for about two years, which was a long time for someone with such a wandering spirit. It was here that he refined the unique vertical style of writing that he started using in telegraphy, a trend that later caught on with penmanship teachers and schools. He says about this writing style, an example of which is shown above: "I developed this style in Louisville while taking press reports. My wire was connected to the 'blind' side of a repeater in Cincinnati, so if I missed a word or sentence, or if the wire was acting up, I couldn't interrupt to get the last words because the Cincinnati operator had no way to hear me. I had to take what came. When I got the job, the cable across the Ohio River at Covington, which connected to the line to Louisville, had a fluctuating leak, causing the strength of the signaling current to vary wildly. I solved this by using several relays, each with a different adjustment, controlling multiple sounders all connected to one sounding plate. The noise was annoying, but I could read it fairly easily. When, on top of this annoying leak, the wires leading north to Cleveland malfunctioned, it took a lot of imagination to understand what was being sent. Imagination takes a certain amount of time to work, and since the information was coming in at thirty-five to forty words per minute, it was quite challenging to write down what was coming and visualize what was missing. So, I needed to become a very fast writer, which led me to search for the quickest style. I discovered that the vertical style, with each letter separate and no flourishes, was the fastest, and the smaller the letter, the quicker the writing. Since I typically processed eight to fifteen columns of news reports each day, it didn’t take long to master this method." Mr. Edison has continued to use this distinctive style of handwriting even to this day.
As a matter of fact, the conditions at Louisville at that time were not much better than they had been at Memphis. The telegraph operating-room was in a deplorable condition. It was on the second story of a dilapidated building on the principal street of the city, with the battery-room in the rear; behind which was the office of the agent of the Associated Press. The plastering was about one-third gone from the ceiling. A small stove, used occasionally in the winter, was connected to the chimney by a tortuous pipe. The office was never cleaned. The switchboard for manipulating the wires was about thirty-four inches square. The brass connections on it were black with age and with the arcing effects of lightning, which, to young Edison, seemed particularly partial to Louisville. "It would strike on the wires," he says, "with an explosion like a cannon-shot, making that office no place for an operator with heart-disease." Around the dingy walls were a dozen tables, the ends next to the wall. They were about the size of those seen in old-fashioned country hotels for holding the wash-bowl and pitcher. The copper wires connecting the instruments to the switchboard were small, crystallized, and rotten. The battery-room was filled with old record-books and message bundles, and one hundred cells of nitric-acid battery, arranged on a stand in the centre of the room. This stand, as well as the floor, was almost eaten through by the destructive action of the powerful acid. Grim and uncompromising as the description reads, it was typical of the equipment in those remote days of the telegraph at the close of the war.
As a matter of fact, the conditions in Louisville at that time were not much better than they had been in Memphis. The telegraph operating room was in terrible shape. It was on the second floor of a rundown building on the main street of the city, with the battery room in the back; behind it was the office of the Associated Press agent. About a third of the plaster was missing from the ceiling. A small stove, used only occasionally in the winter, was connected to the chimney by a twisted pipe. The office was never cleaned. The switchboard for handling the wires was about thirty-four inches square. The brass connections on it were blackened by age and by the effects of lightning, which, according to young Edison, seemed particularly fond of striking Louisville. "It would hit the wires," he recalls, "with an explosion like a cannon shot, making that office no place for an operator with heart trouble." Around the dingy walls were about a dozen tables, with their ends against the wall. They were about the size of those found in old-fashioned country hotels for holding the washbowl and pitcher. The copper wires connecting the instruments to the switchboard were small, crystallized, and decayed. The battery room was filled with old record books and message bundles, along with one hundred cells of nitric-acid battery arranged on a stand in the center of the room. This stand, as well as the floor, was almost eaten through by the destructive action of the powerful acid. Grim and unyielding as the description may seem, it was typical of the equipment in those distant days of the telegraph at the end of the war.
Illustrative of the length to which telegraphers could go at a time when they were so much in demand, Edison tells the following story: "When I took the position there was a great shortage of operators. One night at 2 A.M. another operator and I were on duty. I was taking press report, and the other man was working the New York wire. We heard a heavy tramp, tramp, tramp on the rickety stairs. Suddenly the door was thrown open with great violence, dislodging it from one of the hinges. There appeared in the doorway one of the best operators we had, who worked daytime, and who was of a very quiet disposition except when intoxicated. He was a great friend of the manager of the office. His eyes were bloodshot and wild, and one sleeve had been torn away from his coat. Without noticing either of us he went up to the stove and kicked it over. The stove-pipe fell, dislocated at every joint. It was half full of exceedingly fine soot, which floated out and filled the room completely. This produced a momentary respite to his labors. When the atmosphere had cleared sufficiently to see, he went around and pulled every table away from the wall, piling them on top of the stove in the middle of the room. Then he proceeded to pull the switchboard away from the wall. It was held tightly by screws. He succeeded, finally, and when it gave way he fell with the board, and striking on a table cut himself so that he soon became covered with blood. He then went to the battery-room and knocked all the batteries off on the floor. The nitric acid soon began to combine with the plaster in the room below, which was the public receiving-room for messengers and bookkeepers. The excess acid poured through and ate up the account-books. After having finished everything to his satisfaction, he left. I told the other operator to do nothing. We would leave things just as they were, and wait until the manager came. In the mean time, as I knew all the wires coming through to the switchboard, I rigged up a temporary set of instruments so that the New York business could be cleared up, and we also got the remainder of the press matter. At 7 o'clock the day men began to appear. They were told to go down-stairs and wait the coming of the manager. At 8 o'clock he appeared, walked around, went into the battery-room, and then came to me, saying: 'Edison, who did this?' I told him that Billy L. had come in full of soda-water and invented the ruin before him. He walked backward and forward, about a minute, then coming up to my table put his fist down, and said: 'If Billy L. ever does that again, I will discharge him.' It was needless to say that there were other operators who took advantage of that kind of discipline, and I had many calls at night after that, but none with such destructive effects."
Edison shares a story that highlights how far telegraphers could go during a time of high demand for their skills: "When I started working there, we were really short on operators. One night at 2 A.M., another operator and I were on shift. I was taking press reports while the other guy was managing the New York wire. We heard heavy steps coming up the shaky stairs. Suddenly, the door flew open violently, almost coming off its hinges. In the doorway stood one of our best operators, who usually worked during the day. He was normally pretty quiet, unless he had been drinking. He was also a close friend of the office manager. His eyes were bloodshot and wild, and one of his coat sleeves was torn. Ignoring us, he went straight to the stove and kicked it over. The stove pipe collapsed at every joint, spilling a lot of fine soot that filled the room. This gave him a brief break from what he was doing. Once the soot settled enough to see, he started pulling every table away from the wall, stacking them on top of the stove in the middle of the room. Then he proceeded to yank the switchboard off the wall. It was tightly secured with screws. He finally managed to free it, but when it came loose, he fell and landed on a table, cutting himself and getting covered in blood. Then he went to the battery room and knocked all the batteries onto the floor. The nitric acid quickly started reacting with the plaster in the room below, which served as the receiving area for messengers and bookkeepers. The acid leaked through and damaged the account books. After making sure everything was to his liking, he left. I told the other operator not to touch anything. We’d just leave things as they were and wait for the manager to arrive. In the meantime, since I knew all the wires leading to the switchboard, I set up a temporary set of instruments to handle the New York business, and we also managed to get the remaining press material. By 7 o'clock, the day crew started showing up. They were instructed to head downstairs and wait for the manager. At 8 o'clock, he showed up, walked around, checked the battery room, and then came to me, saying, 'Edison, who did this?' I told him that Billy L. had come in drunk and created this mess. He paced back and forth for about a minute, then came over to my table, slammed his fist down, and said, 'If Billy L. ever does that again, I’ll fire him.' It’s worth mentioning that other operators took advantage of that kind of discipline, and I got many calls at night after that, but none were as destructive."
This was one aspect of life as it presented itself to the sensitive and observant young operator in Louisville. But there was another, more intellectual side, in the contact afforded with journalism and its leaders, and the information taken in almost unconsciously as to the political and social movements of the time. Mr. Edison looks back on this with great satisfaction. "I remember," he says, "the discussions between the celebrated poet and journalist George D. Prentice, then editor of the Courier-Journal, and Mr. Tyler, of the Associated Press. I believe Prentice was the father of the humorous paragraph of the American newspaper. He was poetic, highly educated, and a brilliant talker. He was very thin and small. I do not think he weighed over one hundred and twenty five pounds. Tyler was a graduate of Harvard, and had a very clear enunciation, and, in sharp contrast to Prentice, he was a large man. After the paper had gone to press, Prentice would generally come over to Tyler's office and start talking. Having while in Tyler's office heard them arguing on the immortality of the soul, etc., I asked permission of Mr. Tyler if, after finishing the press matter, I might come in and listen to the conversation, which I did many times after. One thing I never could comprehend was that Tyler had a sideboard with liquors and generally crackers. Prentice would pour out half a glass of what they call corn whiskey, and would dip the crackers in it and eat them. Tyler took it sans food. One teaspoonful of that stuff would put me to sleep."
This was one aspect of life as it appeared to the sensitive and observant young operator in Louisville. But there was another, more intellectual side, involving interactions with journalism and its leaders, along with the information absorbed almost subconsciously regarding the political and social movements of the time. Mr. Edison looks back on this with great satisfaction. "I remember," he says, "the discussions between the famous poet and journalist George D. Prentice, who was then the editor of the Courier-Journal, and Mr. Tyler from the Associated Press. I believe Prentice was the originator of the humorous paragraph in American newspapers. He was poetic, highly educated, and a brilliant conversationalist. He was very thin and small; I don’t think he weighed more than one hundred and twenty-five pounds. Tyler was a Harvard graduate with very clear speech, and, in sharp contrast to Prentice, he was a large man. After the paper had gone to press, Prentice would usually come over to Tyler's office and start talking. Having overheard them debating topics like the immortality of the soul in Tyler's office, I asked Mr. Tyler if I could join in and listen to their conversation, which I ended up doing many times after. One thing I could never understand was that Tyler had a sideboard filled with liquor and usually crackers. Prentice would pour out half a glass of what they call corn whiskey, dip the crackers in it, and eat them. Tyler drank it straight. One teaspoon of that stuff would put me to sleep."
Mr. Edison throws also a curious side-light on the origin of the comic column in the modern American newspaper, the telegraph giving to a new joke or a good story the ubiquity and instantaneity of an important historical event. "It was the practice of the press operators all over the country at that time, when a lull occurred, to start in and send jokes or stories the day men had collected; and these were copied and pasted up on the bulletin-board. Cleveland was the originating office for 'press,' which it received from New York, and sent it out simultaneously to Milwaukee, Chicago, Toledo, Detroit, Pittsburg, Columbus, Dayton, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Vincennes, Terre Haute, St. Louis, and Louisville. Cleveland would call first on Milwaukee, if he had anything. If so, he would send it, and Cleveland would repeat it to all of us. Thus any joke or story originating anywhere in that area was known the next day all over. The press men would come in and copy anything which could be published, which was about three per cent. I collected, too, quite a large scrap-book of it, but unfortunately have lost it."
Mr. Edison also sheds some light on how the comic column in modern American newspapers began, with the telegraph making a new joke or a good story spread quickly and widely like an important historical event. "Back then, it was common for press operators across the country, during slow periods, to send out jokes or stories the day staff had gathered. These would be copied and put up on the bulletin board. Cleveland was the main hub for 'press' content, which it received from New York and distributed simultaneously to Milwaukee, Chicago, Toledo, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Dayton, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Vincennes, Terre Haute, St. Louis, and Louisville. Cleveland would check in with Milwaukee first if he had anything to share. If he had something, he’d send it, and then Cleveland would share it with all of us. As a result, any joke or story that originated in that region was known everywhere the next day. The press guys would come in and copy anything that could be published, which was about three percent. I also collected quite a large scrapbook of it, but unfortunately, I've lost it."
Edison tells an amusing story of his own pursuits at this time. Always an omnivorous reader, he had some difficulty in getting a sufficient quantity of literature for home consumption, and was in the habit of buying books at auctions and second-hand stores. One day at an auction-room he secured a stack of twenty unbound volumes of the North American Review for two dollars. These he had bound and delivered at the telegraph office. One morning, when he was free as usual at 3 o'clock, he started off at a rapid pace with ten volumes on his shoulder. He found himself very soon the subject of a fusillade. When he stopped, a breathless policeman grabbed him by the throat and ordered him to drop his parcel and explain matters, as a suspicious character. He opened the package showing the books, somewhat to the disgust of the officer, who imagined he had caught a burglar sneaking away in the dark alley with his booty. Edison explained that being deaf he had heard no challenge, and therefore had kept moving; and the policeman remarked apologetically that it was fortunate for Edison he was not a better shot.
Edison shares a funny story about his experiences during that time. Always a voracious reader, he struggled to find enough books to read at home and often bought them at auctions and second-hand stores. One day at an auction, he picked up a stack of twenty unbound volumes of the North American Review for just two dollars. He had them bound and sent to the telegraph office. One morning, when he was free at 3 o'clock as usual, he took off quickly with ten volumes on his shoulder. Before long, he became the target of a barrage of questions. When he stopped, a breathless policeman grabbed him by the throat and demanded he drop his parcel and explain himself, thinking he looked suspicious. He opened the package to show the books, much to the officer's annoyance, who had imagined he caught a burglar sneaking away with stolen goods in the dark alley. Edison explained that since he was deaf, he hadn’t heard any challenge, so he kept moving; the policeman then apologetically remarked that it was lucky for Edison he wasn't a better shot.
The incident is curiously revelatory of the character of the man, for it must be admitted that while literary telegraphers are by no means scarce, there are very few who would spend scant savings on back numbers of a ponderous review at an age when tragedy, beer, and pretzels are far more enticing. Through all his travels Edison has preserved those books, and has them now in his library at Llewellyn Park, on Orange Mountain, New Jersey.
The incident reveals a lot about the man's character because, while there are plenty of literary enthusiasts out there, very few would spend their limited savings on old issues of a heavy magazine when they could be enjoying things like drama, beer, and snacks instead. Throughout all his travels, Edison has kept those books, and he has them now in his library at Llewellyn Park, on Orange Mountain, New Jersey.
Drifting after a time from Louisville, Edison made his way as far north as Detroit, but, like the famous Duke of York, soon made his way back again. Possibly the severer discipline after the happy-go-lucky regime in the Southern city had something to do with this restlessness, which again manifested itself, however, on his return thither. The end of the war had left the South a scene of destruction and desolation, and many men who had fought bravely and well found it hard to reconcile themselves to the grim task of reconstruction. To them it seemed better to "let ill alone" and seek some other clime where conditions would be less onerous. At this moment a great deal of exaggerated talk was current as to the sunny life and easy wealth of Latin America, and under its influences many "unreconstructed" Southerners made their way to Mexico, Brazil, Peru, or the Argentine. Telegraph operators were naturally in touch with this movement, and Edison's fertile imagination was readily inflamed by the glowing idea of all these vague possibilities. Again he threw up his steady work and, with a couple of sanguine young friends, made his way to New Orleans. They had the notion of taking positions in the Brazilian Government telegraphs, as an advertisement had been inserted in some paper stating that operators were wanted. They had timed their departure from Louisville so as to catch a specially chartered steamer, which was to leave New Orleans for Brazil on a certain day, to convey a large number of Confederates and their families, who were disgusted with the United States and were going to settle in Brazil, where slavery still prevailed. Edison and his friends arrived in New Orleans just at the time of the great riot, when several hundred negroes were killed, and the city was in the hands of a mob. The Government had seized the steamer chartered for Brazil, in order to bring troops from the Yazoo River to New Orleans to stop the rioting. The young operators therefore visited another shipping-office to make inquiries as to vessels for Brazil, and encountered an old Spaniard who sat in a chair near the steamer agent's desk, and to whom they explained their intentions. He had lived and worked in South America, and was very emphatic in his assertion, as he shook his yellow, bony finger at them, that the worst mistake they could possibly make would be to leave the United States. He would not leave on any account, and they as young Americans would always regret it if they forsook their native land, whose freedom, climate, and opportunities could not be equalled anywhere on the face of the globe. Such sincere advice as this could not be disdained, and Edison made his way North again. One cannot resist speculation as to what might have happened to Edison himself and to the development of electricity had he made this proposed plunge into the enervating tropics. It will be remembered that at a somewhat similar crisis in life young Robert Burns entertained seriously the idea of forsaking Scotland for the West Indies. That he did not go was certainly better for Scottish verse, to which he contributed later so many immortal lines; and it was probably better for himself, even if he died a gauger. It is simply impossible to imagine Edison working out the phonograph, telephone, and incandescent lamp under the tropical climes he sought. Some years later he was informed that both his companions had gone to Vera Cruz, Mexico, and had died there of yellow fever.
Drifting for a while from Louisville, Edison moved as far north as Detroit, but like the famous Duke of York, he soon returned. The stricter discipline after the carefree environment of the Southern city might have contributed to this restlessness, which resurfaced during his return. The end of the war had left the South in ruins, and many men who had fought bravely struggled to adjust to the harsh realities of rebuilding. It seemed easier for them to "let it be" and look for a place where life was less burdensome. At that time, there was a lot of exaggerated talk about the sunny lifestyle and easy riches in Latin America, and many "unreconstructed" Southerners traveled to Mexico, Brazil, Peru, or Argentina. Telegraph operators were naturally connected to this movement, and Edison's imaginative mind was piqued by the alluring possibilities. He once again quit his steady job and, along with a couple of optimistic friends, headed to New Orleans. They intended to apply for positions in the Brazilian Government telegraphs, responding to an advertisement that said operators were needed. They planned their departure from Louisville to catch a specially chartered steamer, which was supposed to leave New Orleans for Brazil on a specific day, carrying a large group of Confederates and their families who were fed up with the United States and wanted to settle in Brazil, where slavery still existed. Edison and his friends arrived in New Orleans just in time for a huge riot, during which several hundred Black people were killed, and the city was overrun by a mob. The Government had seized the chartered steamer for Brazil to bring troops from the Yazoo River to New Orleans to quell the chaos. The young operators then visited another shipping office to ask about ships to Brazil and met an old Spaniard who sat near the steamer agent's desk. They shared their intentions with him, and he, having lived and worked in South America, was adamant, shaking his yellow, bony finger at them, that leaving the United States would be the worst mistake they could make. He insisted he would never leave and that as young Americans, they would always regret abandoning their homeland, which offered freedom, a great climate, and unparalleled opportunities. Such sincere advice couldn't be ignored, and Edison decided to head north again. One can't help but wonder what might have happened to Edison and the progress of electricity had he gone to the relaxing tropics. It's worth noting that at a similar turning point in his life, young Robert Burns seriously considered leaving Scotland for the West Indies. His decision to stay certainly benefited Scottish poetry, to which he later contributed many timeless lines; it was probably better for him, too, even if he ended up as a gauger. It's hard to imagine Edison creating the phonograph, telephone, and incandescent lamp in the tropical climate he sought. Years later, he learned that both his companions had gone to Vera Cruz, Mexico, and had died there from yellow fever.
Work was soon resumed at Louisville, where the dilapidated old office occupied at the close of the war had been exchanged for one much more comfortable and luxurious in its equipment. As before, Edison was allotted to press report, and remembers very distinctly taking the Presidential message and veto of the District of Columbia bill by President Johnson. As the matter was received over the wire he paragraphed it so that each printer had exactly three lines, thus enabling the matter to be set up very expeditiously in the newspaper offices. This earned him the gratitude of the editors, a dinner, and all the newspaper "exchanges" he wanted. Edison's accounts of the sprees and debauches of other night operators in the loosely managed offices enable one to understand how even a little steady application to the work in hand would be appreciated. On one occasion Edison acted as treasurer for his bibulous companions, holding the stakes, so to speak, in order that the supply of liquor might last longer. One of the mildest mannered of the party took umbrage at the parsimony of the treasurer and knocked him down, whereupon the others in the party set upon the assailant and mauled him so badly that he had to spend three weeks in hospital. At another time two of his companions sharing the temporary hospitality of his room smashed most of the furniture, and went to bed with their boots on. Then his kindly good-nature rebelled. "I felt that this was running hospitality into the ground, so I pulled them out and left them on the floor to cool off from their alcoholic trance."
Work quickly resumed in Louisville, where the rundown old office used at the end of the war was replaced with a much more comfortable and well-equipped space. As before, Edison was assigned to press reporting, and he clearly remembers taking President Johnson's message and veto of the District of Columbia bill. When the information came in over the wire, he formatted it into paragraphs so that each printer received exactly three lines, which allowed the news to be set up quickly in the newspaper offices. This earned him the editors' gratitude, a dinner invitation, and access to all the newspaper "exchanges" he wanted. Edison's stories about the wild nights of other night operators in the loosely run offices show how even a bit of consistent effort on the job was valued. One time, Edison acted as the treasurer for his drinking buddies, holding the money to ensure they had drinks for longer. One of the mildest of the group got upset with the treasurer for being cheap and knocked him down, prompting the others to jump in and beat up the attacker so badly that he ended up in the hospital for three weeks. On another occasion, two of his friends who were temporarily staying in his room broke most of the furniture and went to bed with their boots on. At that point, his good-natured kindness gave way to annoyance. "I felt that this was taking hospitality too far, so I pulled them out of bed and left them on the floor to come down from their drunken state."
Edison seems on the whole to have been fairly comfortable and happy in Louisville, surrounding himself with books and experimental apparatus, and even inditing a treatise on electricity. But his very thirst for knowledge and new facts again proved his undoing. The instruments in the handsome new offices were fastened in their proper places, and operators were strictly forbidden to remove them, or to use the batteries except on regular work. This prohibition meant little to Edison, who had access to no other instruments except those of the company. "I went one night," he says, "into the battery-room to obtain some sulphuric acid for experimenting. The carboy tipped over, the acid ran out, went through to the manager's room below, and ate up his desk and all the carpet. The next morning I was summoned before him, and told that what the company wanted was operators, not experimenters. I was at liberty to take my pay and get out."
Edison seemed to be quite comfortable and happy in Louisville, surrounding himself with books and experimental equipment, even writing a paper on electricity. But his eagerness for knowledge and new discoveries ended up being his downfall. The tools in the nice new office were secured in their designated spots, and employees were strictly forbidden from removing them or using the batteries except for official work. This rule didn't mean much to Edison, who had access to no other tools aside from the company’s. "One night," he says, "I went into the battery room to get some sulfuric acid for experimenting. The carboy tipped over, the acid spilled, went down to the manager’s office below, and ruined his desk and all the carpet. The next morning, I was called in to see him and told that what the company needed were operators, not experimenters. I was free to take my pay and leave."
The fact that Edison is a very studious man, an insatiate lover and reader of books, is well known to his associates; but surprise is often expressed at his fund of miscellaneous information. This, it will be seen, is partly explained by his work for years as a "press" reporter. He says of this: "The second time I was in Louisville, they had moved into a new office, and the discipline was now good. I took the press job. In fact, I was a very poor sender, and therefore made the taking of press report a specialty. The newspaper men allowed me to come over after going to press at 3 A.M. and get all the exchanges I wanted. These I would take home and lay at the foot of my bed. I never slept more than four or five hours' so that I would awake at nine or ten and read these papers until dinner-time. I thus kept posted, and knew from their activity every member of Congress, and what committees they were on; and all about the topical doings, as well as the prices of breadstuffs in all the primary markets. I was in a much better position than most operators to call on my imagination to supply missing words or sentences, which were frequent in those days of old, rotten wires, badly insulated, especially on stormy nights. Upon such occasions I had to supply in some cases one-fifth of the whole matter—pure guessing—but I got caught only once. There had been some kind of convention in Virginia, in which John Minor Botts was the leading figure. There was great excitement about it, and two votes had been taken in the convention on the two days. There was no doubt that the vote the next day would go a certain way. A very bad storm came up about 10 o'clock, and my wire worked very badly. Then there was a cessation of all signals; then I made out the words 'Minor Botts.' The next was a New York item. I filled in a paragraph about the convention and how the vote had gone, as I was sure it would. But next day I learned that instead of there being a vote the convention had adjourned without action until the day after." In like manner, it was at Louisville that Mr. Edison got an insight into the manner in which great political speeches are more frequently reported than the public suspects. "The Associated Press had a shorthand man travelling with President Johnson when he made his celebrated swing around the circle in a private train delivering hot speeches in defence of his conduct. The man engaged me to write out the notes from his reading. He came in loaded and on the verge of incoherence. We started in, but about every two minutes I would have to scratch out whole paragraphs and insert the same things said in another and better way. He would frequently change words, always to the betterment of the speech. I couldn't understand this, and when he got through, and I had copied about three columns, I asked him why those changes, if he read from notes. 'Sonny,' he said, 'if these politicians had their speeches published as they deliver them, a great many shorthand writers would be out of a job. The best shorthanders and the holders of good positions are those who can take a lot of rambling, incoherent stuff and make a rattling good speech out of it.'"
Edison's reputation as a dedicated and enthusiastic reader is well-known among his colleagues, but they are often surprised by his vast and diverse knowledge. This is partly due to his years of experience as a "press" reporter. He recounts: "The second time I was in Louisville, they had moved to a new office, and the discipline was much better. I took the press job. To be honest, I wasn't great at sending, so I specialized in taking press reports. The newspaper guys let me come in after they went to press at 3 A.M. to grab all the exchanges I wanted. I'd take them home and stack them at the foot of my bed. I hardly ever slept more than four or five hours, so I’d wake up around nine or ten and read those papers until dinner. This kept me informed; I knew the activities of every member of Congress and the committees they were on, as well as the current prices of breadstuffs in all the major markets. I was in a much better position than most operators to use my imagination to fill in missing words or phrases, which happened often with the old, faulty wires, especially on stormy nights. Sometimes I had to guess about one-fifth of the content—just pure guessing—but I only got caught once. There had been some kind of convention in Virginia, where John Minor Botts was a key figure. There was a lot of hype around it, and two votes had taken place over two days. Everyone expected the next vote to go a certain way. Around 10 o'clock, a bad storm hit, and my wire started acting up. Then all signals ceased; the only thing I could decipher were the words 'Minor Botts.' Next was a New York item. I wrote a paragraph about the convention and how I thought the vote had gone. But the next day, I found out that instead of voting, the convention had adjourned without making a decision until the day after." In a similar way, it was in Louisville that Edison learned how political speeches are often reported differently than the public realizes. "The Associated Press had a shorthand writer traveling with President Johnson during his famous swing around the circle in a private train, where he delivered speeches defending his actions. This guy hired me to transcribe the notes from his readings. He came in overwhelmed and nearly incoherent. We got started, but every two minutes, I had to scratch out entire paragraphs and rephrase them in a clearer way. He frequently changed words, always improving the speech. I couldn't figure out why he was doing this if he was reading from notes. After I had copied about three columns, I asked him why he made those changes. 'Kid,' he said, 'if these politicians had their speeches published as they give them, a lot of shorthand writers would be out of work. The top shorthand writers are the ones who can take a lot of rambling, disorganized stuff and turn it into a really solid speech.'"
Going back to Cincinnati and beginning his second term there as an operator, Edison found the office in new quarters and with greatly improved management. He was again put on night duty, much to his satisfaction. He rented a room in the top floor of an office building, bought a cot and an oil-stove, a foot lathe, and some tools. He cultivated the acquaintance of Mr. Sommers, superintendent of telegraph of the Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad, who gave him permission to take such scrap apparatus as he might desire, that was of no use to the company. With Sommers on one occasion he had an opportunity to indulge his always strong sense of humor. "Sommers was a very witty man," he says, "and fond of experimenting. We worked on a self-adjusting telegraph relay, which would have been very valuable if we could have got it. I soon became the possessor of a second-hand Ruhmkorff induction coil, which, although it would only give a small spark, would twist the arms and clutch the hands of a man so that he could not let go of the apparatus. One day we went down to the round-house of the Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad and connected up the long wash-tank in the room with the coil, one electrode being connected to earth. Above this wash-room was a flat roof. We bored a hole through the roof, and could see the men as they came in. The first man as he entered dipped his hands in the water. The floor being wet he formed a circuit, and up went his hands. He tried it the second time, with the same result. He then stood against the wall with a puzzled expression. We surmised that he was waiting for somebody else to come in, which occurred shortly after—with the same result. Then they went out, and the place was soon crowded, and there was considerable excitement. Various theories were broached to explain the curious phenomenon. We enjoyed the sport immensely." It must be remembered that this was over forty years ago, when there was no popular instruction in electricity, and when its possibilities for practical joking were known to very few. To-day such a crowd of working-men would be sure to include at least one student of a night school or correspondence course who would explain the mystery offhand.
Heading back to Cincinnati and starting his second term there as an operator, Edison found the office in a new location and with much better management. He was once again assigned to night duty, which he really liked. He rented a room on the top floor of an office building, bought a cot and an oil stove, a foot lathe, and some tools. He made friends with Mr. Sommers, the superintendent of telegraphs for the Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad, who let him take any scrap equipment that the company no longer needed. One time, he had a chance to show off his strong sense of humor with Sommers. "Sommers was a very witty guy," he said, "and loved to experiment. We worked on a self-adjusting telegraph relay that would have been very valuable if we could have made it work. I soon got my hands on a second-hand Ruhmkorff induction coil, which, although it only produced a small spark, would make a person’s arms twist and grip so tightly that he couldn't let go of the device. One day we went to the roundhouse of the Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad and connected the long wash-tank in the room to the coil, with one electrode grounded. Above the washroom was a flat roof. We drilled a hole through the roof and could see the men as they walked in. The first guy who entered dipped his hands in the water. Since the floor was wet, he completed the circuit, and his hands shot up. He tried it a second time, with the same result. After that, he leaned against the wall, looking puzzled. We guessed he was waiting for someone else to come in, which happened a little later—with the same outcome. Then they left, and the place quickly got crowded, generating a lot of excitement. Various theories were proposed to explain the strange phenomenon. We thoroughly enjoyed the prank." It’s important to remember that this happened over forty years ago, when there wasn’t much public knowledge about electricity and only a few people were aware of its potential for practical jokes. Today, a crowd of workers would surely include at least one night school or correspondence course student who could easily explain the mystery.
Note has been made of the presence of Ellsworth in the Cincinnati office, and his service with the Confederate guerrilla Morgan, for whom he tapped Federal wires, read military messages, sent false ones, and did serious mischief generally. It is well known that one operator can recognize another by the way in which he makes his signals—it is his style of handwriting. Ellsworth possessed in a remarkable degree the skill of imitating these peculiarities, and thus he deceived the Union operators easily. Edison says that while apparently a quiet man in bearing, Ellsworth, after the excitement of fighting, found the tameness of a telegraph office obnoxious, and that he became a bad "gun man" in the Panhandle of Texas, where he was killed. "We soon became acquainted," says Edison of this period in Cincinnati, "and he wanted me to invent a secret method of sending despatches so that an intermediate operator could not tap the wire and understand it. He said that if it could be accomplished, he could sell it to the Government for a large sum of money. This suited me, and I started in and succeeded in making such an instrument, which had in it the germ of my quadruplex now used throughout the world, permitting the despatch of four messages over one wire simultaneously. By the time I had succeeded in getting the apparatus to work, Ellsworth suddenly disappeared. Many years afterward I used this little device again for the same purpose. At Menlo Park, New Jersey, I had my laboratory. There were several Western Union wires cut into the laboratory, and used by me in experimenting at night. One day I sat near an instrument which I had left connected during the night. I soon found it was a private wire between New York and Philadelphia, and I heard among a lot of stuff a message that surprised me. A week after that I had occasion to go to New York, and, visiting the office of the lessee of the wire, I asked him if he hadn't sent such and such a message. The expression that came over his face was a sight. He asked me how I knew of any message. I told him the circumstances, and suggested that he had better cipher such communications, or put on a secret sounder. The result of the interview was that I installed for him my old Cincinnati apparatus, which was used thereafter for many years."
Note has been made of Ellsworth’s presence in the Cincinnati office and his work with the Confederate guerrilla Morgan, for whom he tapped Federal wires, read military messages, sent false ones, and generally caused serious trouble. It’s well known that one operator can identify another by how they send their signals—it’s like their signature. Ellsworth had a remarkable skill for mimicking these unique styles, allowing him to easily deceive Union operators. Edison mentions that while Ellsworth seemed quiet, after the adrenaline of battle, he found the monotony of a telegraph office unbearable and ended up becoming a bad “gun man” in the Panhandle of Texas, where he was killed. “We soon became friends,” Edison recalls from that time in Cincinnati, “and he wanted me to invent a secret way of sending messages so that an intermediate operator couldn’t tap the wire and understand what was being said. He claimed that if I could do this, he could sell it to the Government for a good amount of money. I liked the idea and got to work, eventually creating an instrument that held the foundation of my quadruplex, which is now used worldwide, allowing four messages to be sent over one wire at the same time. Just as I got the apparatus to work, Ellsworth suddenly vanished. Many years later, I used this small device again for the same purpose. In Menlo Park, New Jersey, I had my lab with several Western Union wires connected for my nighttime experiments. One day, I was sitting near an instrument I had left on overnight. I soon realized it was a private wire between New York and Philadelphia, and I heard a message that surprised me. A week later, I went to New York and visited the office of the wire's lessee, asking if he had sent a particular message. The look on his face was priceless. He asked how I knew about any message. I explained the situation and suggested he should cipher such communications or use a secret sounder. After our meeting, I installed my old Cincinnati apparatus for him, which was used for many years after that."
Edison did not make a very long stay in Cincinnati this time, but went home after a while to Port Huron. Soon tiring of idleness and isolation he sent "a cry from Macedonia" to his old friend "Milt" Adams, who was in Boston, and whom he wished to rejoin if he could get work promptly in the East.
Edison didn’t stay in Cincinnati for long this time; he returned home to Port Huron after a bit. Soon feeling bored and isolated, he sent a distress signal to his old friend "Milt" Adams, who was in Boston, hoping to reunite if he could find work quickly in the East.
Edison himself gives the details of this eventful move, when he went East to grow up with the new art of electricity. "I had left Louisville the second time, and went home to see my parents. After stopping at home for some time, I got restless, and thought I would like to work in the East. Knowing that a former operator named Adams, who had worked with me in the Cincinnati office, was in Boston, I wrote him that I wanted a job there. He wrote back that if I came on immediately he could get me in the Western Union office. I had helped out the Grand Trunk Railroad telegraph people by a new device when they lost one of the two submarine cables they had across the river, making the remaining cable act just as well for their purpose, as if they had two. I thought I was entitled to a pass, which they conceded; and I started for Boston. After leaving Toronto a terrific blizzard came up and the train got snowed under in a cut. After staying there twenty-four hours, the trainmen made snowshoes of fence-rail splints and started out to find food, which they did about a half mile away. They found a roadside inn, and by means of snowshoes all the passengers were taken to the inn. The train reached Montreal four days late. A number of the passengers and myself went to the military headquarters to testify in favor of a soldier who was on furlough, and was two days late, which was a serious matter with military people, I learned. We willingly did this, for this soldier was a great story-teller, and made the time pass quickly. I met here a telegraph operator named Stanton, who took me to his boarding-house, the most cheerless I have ever been in. Nobody got enough to eat; the bedclothes were too short and too thin; it was 28 degrees below zero, and the wash-water was frozen solid. The board was cheap, being only $1.50 per week.
Edison himself shares the details of this significant move when he headed East to embrace the new art of electricity. "I had left Louisville for the second time and went home to visit my parents. After staying there for a while, I became restless and thought I’d like to work in the East. Knowing that a former operator named Adams, who had worked with me in Cincinnati, was in Boston, I wrote to him asking for a job. He replied that if I came right away, he could get me into the Western Union office. I had previously helped the Grand Trunk Railroad telegraph team with a new device when they lost one of their two submarine cables across the river, making the remaining cable work just as well as if they had two. I felt I deserved a pass for that, which they granted, so I headed for Boston. After leaving Toronto, a massive blizzard hit, and the train got stuck in a snowdrift. After being stranded there for twenty-four hours, the train crew fashioned snowshoes out of fence rails and set out to find food, which they discovered about half a mile away. They found a roadside inn, and with the help of snowshoes, all the passengers were taken there. The train arrived in Montreal four days late. Several passengers and I went to the military headquarters to testify on behalf of a soldier who was two days late from furlough, which was serious for military folks, I learned. We willingly did this because the soldier was a fantastic storyteller, making the time pass quickly. I met a telegraph operator named Stanton there, who took me to his boarding house, the most miserable place I’ve ever stayed in. Nobody got enough to eat; the bedclothes were too short and too thin; it was 28 degrees below zero, and the wash water was frozen solid. The food was cheap, at only $1.50 a week."
"Stanton said that the usual live-stock accompaniment of operators' boarding-houses was absent; he thought the intense cold had caused them to hibernate. Stanton, when I was working in Cincinnati, left his position and went out on the Union Pacific to work at Julesburg, which was a cattle town at that time and very tough. I remember seeing him off on the train, never expecting to see him again. Six months afterward, while working press wire in Cincinnati, about 2 A.M., there was flung into the middle of the operating-room a large tin box. It made a report like a pistol, and we all jumped up startled. In walked Stanton. 'Gentlemen,' he said 'I have just returned from a pleasure trip to the land beyond the Mississippi. All my wealth is contained in my metallic travelling case and you are welcome to it.' The case contained one paper collar. He sat down, and I noticed that he had a woollen comforter around his neck with his coat buttoned closely. The night was intensely warm. He then opened his coat and revealed the fact that he had nothing but the bare skin. 'Gentlemen,' said he, 'you see before you an operator who has reached the limit of impecuniosity.'" Not far from the limit of impecuniosity was Edison himself, as he landed in Boston in 1868 after this wintry ordeal.
"Stanton mentioned that the usual livestock around the operators' boarding houses was missing; he thought the extreme cold had made them hibernate. When I was working in Cincinnati, Stanton quit his job and went out on the Union Pacific to work in Julesburg, which was a rough cattle town back then. I remember seeing him off at the train station, never expecting to see him again. Six months later, while I was working press wire in Cincinnati around 2 A.M., a large tin box was thrown into the middle of the operating room. It made a sound like a gunshot, and we all jumped up, startled. In walked Stanton. 'Gentlemen,' he said, 'I have just returned from a pleasure trip to the land beyond the Mississippi. All my wealth is in my metallic traveling case, and you’re welcome to it.' The case held one paper collar. He sat down, and I noticed he had a woolen scarf wrapped around his neck with his coat buttoned up tightly. The night was extremely warm. He then opened his coat and showed that he had nothing but bare skin underneath. 'Gentlemen,' he said, 'you see before you an operator who has hit rock bottom in terms of finances.'" Not far from rock bottom was Edison himself, when he arrived in Boston in 1868 after this winter ordeal.
This chapter has run to undue length, but it must not close without one citation from high authority as to the service of the military telegraph corps so often referred to in it. General Grant in his Memoirs, describing the movements of the Army of the Potomac, lays stress on the service of his telegraph operators, and says: "Nothing could be more complete than the organization and discipline of this body of brave and intelligent men. Insulated wires were wound upon reels, two men and a mule detailed to each reel. The pack-saddle was provided with a rack like a sawbuck, placed crosswise, so that the wheel would revolve freely; there was a wagon provided with a telegraph operator, battery, and instruments for each division corps and army, and for my headquarters. Wagons were also loaded with light poles supplied with an iron spike at each end to hold the wires up. The moment troops were in position to go into camp, the men would put up their wires. Thus in a few minutes' longer time than it took a mule to walk the length of its coil, telegraphic communication would be effected between all the headquarters of the army. No orders ever had to be given to establish the telegraph."
This chapter has gotten a bit long, but it can't end without one mention from a respected source about the military telegraph corps we've talked about frequently. General Grant, in his Memoirs, emphasizes the contributions of his telegraph operators while describing the movements of the Army of the Potomac. He states: "Nothing could be more complete than the organization and discipline of this group of brave and intelligent men. Insulated wires were rolled onto reels, with two men and a mule assigned to each reel. The pack-saddle had a rack like a sawbuck, positioned crosswise so the wheel could turn freely; there was also a wagon equipped with a telegraph operator, a battery, and instruments for each division and the army, as well as for my headquarters. Additional wagons were filled with light poles that had an iron spike at each end to hold the wires up. As soon as the troops were set up to go into camp, the men would set up their wires. Therefore, in just a few more minutes than it took a mule to walk the length of its coil, telegraphic communication would be established between all the army's headquarters. No orders were ever necessary to set up the telegraph."
CHAPTER VI
WORK AND INVENTION IN BOSTON
MILTON ADAMS was working in the office of the Franklin Telegraph Company in Boston when he received Edison's appeal from Port Huron, and with characteristic impetuosity at once made it his business to secure a position for his friend. There was no opening in the Franklin office, so Adams went over to the Western Union office, and asked the manager, Mr. George F. Milliken, if he did not want an operator who, like young Lochinvar, came out of the West. "What kind of copy does he make?" was the cautious response. "I passed Edison's letter through the window for his inspection. Milliken read it, and a look of surprise came over his countenance as he asked me if he could take it off the line like that. I said he certainly could, and that there was nobody who could stick him. Milliken said that if he was that kind of an operator I could send for him, and I wrote to Edison to come on, as I had a job for him in the main office of the Western Union." Meantime Edison had secured his pass over the Grand Trunk Railroad, and spent four days and nights on the journey, suffering extremes of cold and hunger. Franklin's arrival in Philadelphia finds its parallel in the very modest debut of Adams's friend in Boston.
MILTON ADAMS was working at the Franklin Telegraph Company in Boston when he got Edison's request from Port Huron, and with his usual enthusiasm, he immediately set out to find a job for his friend. There wasn't an opening at the Franklin office, so Adams went over to the Western Union office and asked the manager, Mr. George F. Milliken, if he needed an operator who, like young Lochinvar, came from the West. "What kind of copy does he produce?" was the cautious response. "I sent Edison's letter over for him to check out." Milliken read it, and a look of surprise crossed his face as he asked if he could take it off the line like that. I confirmed he could, and that there was no one who could outdo him. Milliken said that if he was that good of an operator, I could go ahead and bring him in, so I wrote to Edison to come because I had a job for him at the main office of Western Union. In the meantime, Edison had secured his pass on the Grand Trunk Railroad and spent four days and nights traveling, enduring extreme cold and hunger. Franklin's arrival in Philadelphia parallels the very humble debut of Adams's friend in Boston.
It took only five minutes for Edison to get the "job," for Superintendent Milliken, a fine type of telegraph official, saw quickly through the superficialities, and realized that it was no ordinary young operator he was engaging. Edison himself tells the story of what happened. "The manager asked me when I was ready to go to work. 'Now,' I replied I was then told to return at 5.30 P.M., and punctually at that hour I entered the main operating-room and was introduced to the night manager. The weather being cold, and being clothed poorly, my peculiar appearance caused much mirth, and, as I afterward learned, the night operators had consulted together how they might 'put up a job on the jay from the woolly West.' I was given a pen and assigned to the New York No. 1 wire. After waiting an hour, I was told to come over to a special table and take a special report for the Boston Herald, the conspirators having arranged to have one of the fastest senders in New York send the despatch and 'salt' the new man. I sat down unsuspiciously at the table, and the New York man started slowly. Soon he increased his speed, to which I easily adapted my pace. This put my rival on his mettle, and he put on his best powers, which, however, were soon reached. At this point I happened to look up, and saw the operators all looking over my shoulder, with their faces shining with fun and excitement. I knew then that they were trying to put up a job on me, but kept my own counsel. The New York man then commenced to slur over his words, running them together and sticking the signals; but I had been used to this style of telegraphy in taking report, and was not in the least discomfited. Finally, when I thought the fun had gone far enough, and having about completed the special, I quietly opened the key and remarked, telegraphically, to my New York friend: 'Say, young man, change off and send with your other foot.' This broke the New York man all up, and he turned the job over to another man to finish."
It took only five minutes for Edison to get the "job" because Superintendent Milliken, a great type of telegraph official, quickly saw through the surface and realized that this was no ordinary young operator he was hiring. Edison himself tells the story of what happened. "The manager asked me when I was ready to start working. 'Now,' I replied. I was then told to come back at 5:30 PM, and right on time I walked into the main operating room and was introduced to the night manager. The weather was cold, and since I wasn't dressed well, my odd appearance sparked a lot of laughter, and as I later learned, the night operators had gotten together to figure out how they could 'prank the newbie from the woolly West.' I was given a pen and assigned to the New York No. 1 wire. After waiting for an hour, I was asked to come over to a special table and take a special report for the Boston Herald, with the pranksters having arranged for one of the fastest senders in New York to send the message and 'mess with' the new guy. I sat down innocently at the table, and the New York operator started off slowly. Soon he picked up speed, which I easily matched. This made my competitor step up his game, and he pushed himself, but he quickly hit his limit. At that moment, I happened to look up and saw the operators all peering over my shoulder, their faces lit up with amusement and excitement. I realized then that they were trying to trick me, but I kept my cool. The New York operator then started to slur his words, jumbling them together and sticking the signals; however, I was used to this style of telegraphy from taking reports and wasn’t bothered at all. Finally, when I thought the joke had gone on long enough and after almost finishing the special, I calmly opened the key and said, telegraphically, to my New York colleague: 'Hey, young man, switch it up and send with your other foot.' This completely threw off the New York operator, and he handed the job over to another person to finish."
Edison had a distaste for taking press report, due to the fact that it was steady, continuous work, and interfered with the studies and investigations that could be carried on in the intervals of ordinary commercial telegraphy. He was not lazy in any sense. While he had no very lively interest in the mere routine work of a telegraph office, he had the profoundest curiosity as to the underlying principles of electricity that made telegraphy possible, and he had an unflagging desire and belief in his own ability to improve the apparatus he handled daily. The whole intellectual atmosphere of Boston was favorable to the development of the brooding genius in this shy, awkward, studious youth, utterly indifferent to clothes and personal appearance, but ready to spend his last dollar on books and scientific paraphernalia. It is matter of record that he did once buy a new suit for thirty dollars in Boston, but the following Sunday, while experimenting with acids in his little workshop, the suit was spoiled. "That is what I get for putting so much money in a new suit," was the laconic remark of the youth, who was more than delighted to pick up a complete set of Faraday's works about the same time. Adams says that when Edison brought home these books at 4 A.M. he read steadily until breakfast-time, and then he remarked, enthusiastically: "Adams, I have got so much to do and life is so short, I am going to hustle." And thereupon he started on a run for breakfast. Edison himself says: "It was in Boston I bought Faraday's works. I think I must have tried about everything in those books. His explanations were simple. He used no mathematics. He was the Master Experimenter. I don't think there were many copies of Faraday's works sold in those days. The only people who did anything in electricity were the telegraphers and the opticians making simple school apparatus to demonstrate the principles." One of these firms was Palmer & Hall, whose catalogue of 1850 showed a miniature electric locomotive made by Mr. Thomas Hall, and exhibited in operation the following year at the Charitable Mechanics' Fair in Boston. In 1852 Mr. Hall made for a Dr. A. L. Henderson, of Buffalo, New York, a model line of railroad with electric-motor engine, telegraph line, and electric railroad signals, together with a figure operating the signals at each end of the line automatically. This was in reality the first example of railroad trains moved by telegraph signals, a practice now so common and universal as to attract no comment. To show how little some fundamental methods can change in fifty years, it may be noted that Hall conveyed the current to his tiny car through forty feet of rail, using the rail as conductor, just as Edison did more than thirty years later in his historic experiments for Villard at Menlo Park; and just as a large proportion of American trolley systems do at this present moment.
Edison didn't like taking press reports because it was steady, continuous work that got in the way of his studies and experiments during the breaks from regular commercial telegraphy. He wasn't lazy at all. While he wasn't particularly interested in the routine tasks of a telegraph office, he was extremely curious about the fundamental principles of electricity that made telegraphy work, and he was always eager to improve the equipment he worked with every day. The intellectual vibe of Boston was perfect for nurturing the creative genius in this shy, awkward, studious young man, who didn't care about clothes or his appearance but was willing to spend his last dollar on books and scientific equipment. It's recorded that he once bought a new suit for thirty dollars in Boston, but the following Sunday, while experimenting with acids in his small workshop, the suit was ruined. "That's what I get for spending so much on a new suit," was his short comment, although he was thrilled to find a complete set of Faraday's works around the same time. Adams notes that when Edison brought these books home at 4 A.M., he read straight through until breakfast, and then he excitedly said, "Adams, I've got so much to do and life is so short; I'm going to hustle." And with that, he rushed off to breakfast. Edison himself mentioned, "It was in Boston I bought Faraday's works. I think I must have tried almost everything in those books. His explanations were simple; he used no mathematics. He was the Master Experimenter. I don't think many copies of Faraday's works were sold back then. The only people doing anything with electricity were telegraphers and opticians making basic school equipment to demonstrate the principles." One of these companies was Palmer & Hall, whose 1850 catalog featured a miniature electric locomotive made by Mr. Thomas Hall, showcased in operation the following year at the Charitable Mechanics' Fair in Boston. In 1852, Mr. Hall created a model railroad for Dr. A. L. Henderson of Buffalo, New York, which included an electric-motor engine, a telegraph line, and electric railroad signals, along with a figure that operated the signals automatically at each end of the line. This was actually the first instance of railroad trains being controlled by telegraph signals, a practice that's so common today that it hardly raises eyebrows. To illustrate how some fundamental methods can stay consistent over fifty years, it's worth noting that Hall transmitted the current to his tiny car through forty feet of rail, using the rail as a conductor, just like Edison did more than thirty years later in his groundbreaking experiments for Villard at Menlo Park, and just like many American trolley systems do right now.
It was among such practical, investigating folk as these that Edison was very much at home. Another notable man of this stamp, with whom Edison was thrown in contact, was the late Mr. Charles Williams, who, beginning his career in the electrical field in the forties, was at the height of activity as a maker of apparatus when Edison arrived in the city; and who afterward, as an associate of Alexander Graham Bell, enjoyed the distinction of being the first manufacturer in the world of telephones. At his Court Street workshop Edison was a frequent visitor. Telegraph repairs and experiments were going on constantly, especially on the early fire-alarm telegraphs [1] of Farmer and Gamewell, and with the aid of one of the men there—probably George Anders—Edison worked out into an operative model his first invention, a vote-recorder, the first Edison patent, for which papers were executed on October 11, 1868, and which was taken out June 1, 1869, No. 90,646. The purpose of this particular device was to permit a vote in the National House of Representatives to be taken in a minute or so, complete lists being furnished of all members voting on the two sides of any question Mr. Edison, in recalling the circumstances, says: "Roberts was the telegraph operator who was the financial backer to the extent of $100. The invention when completed was taken to Washington. I think it was exhibited before a committee that had something to do with the Capitol. The chairman of the committee, after seeing how quickly and perfectly it worked, said: 'Young man, if there is any invention on earth that we don't want down here, it is this. One of the greatest weapons in the hands of a minority to prevent bad legislation is filibustering on votes, and this instrument would prevent it.' I saw the truth of this, because as press operator I had taken miles of Congressional proceedings, and to this day an enormous amount of time is wasted during each session of the House in foolishly calling the members' names and recording and then adding their votes, when the whole operation could be done in almost a moment by merely pressing a particular button at each desk. For filibustering purposes, however, the present methods are most admirable." Edison determined from that time forth to devote his inventive faculties only to things for which there was a real, genuine demand, something that subserved the actual necessities of humanity. This first patent was taken out for him by the late Hon. Carroll D. Wright, afterward U. S. Commissioner of Labor, and a well-known publicist, then practicing patent law in Boston. He describes Edison as uncouth in manner, a chewer rather than a smoker of tobacco, but full of intelligence and ideas.
Edison felt right at home among practical, inquisitive people like these. Another remarkable person he encountered was the late Mr. Charles Williams, who began his career in the electrical field in the 1840s and was actively making equipment when Edison came to the city. Later, as an associate of Alexander Graham Bell, he became the world's first telephone manufacturer. Edison frequently visited his workshop on Court Street. There were always telegraph repairs and experiments happening there, especially involving the early fire-alarm telegraphs by Farmer and Gamewell. With the help of one of the men there—likely George Anders—Edison developed his first invention into a working model: a vote-recorder, which turned out to be his first patent. The necessary paperwork was completed on October 11, 1868, and the patent was issued on June 1, 1869, under No. 90,646. This device aimed to allow votes in the National House of Representatives to be cast in about a minute, with complete lists of all members voting on either side of any question. Looking back on it, Edison recalls, “Roberts was the telegraph operator who backed it financially with $100. When the invention was finished, it was taken to Washington. I think it was shown to a committee related to the Capitol. The chairman of the committee, after seeing how quickly and smoothly it worked, said, ‘Young man, if there’s any invention we don’t want here, it’s this one. One of the greatest tools for a minority to block bad legislation is filibustering during votes, and this device would stop that.’ I understood the truth in that because, as a press operator, I had recorded miles of Congressional proceedings. Even today, a lot of time is wasted in each House session just calling out members' names and recording their votes, when it could all be done almost instantly by simply pressing a button at each desk. However, current methods are great for filibustering.” From that moment on, Edison decided to focus his inventive energy only on things that people genuinely needed, things that addressed the real necessities of humanity. This first patent was filed for him by the late Hon. Carroll D. Wright, who later became the U.S. Commissioner of Labor and was a well-known public figure, at the time practicing patent law in Boston. He described Edison as rough around the edges, more of a chewer than a smoker of tobacco, but full of intelligence and ideas.
[Footnote 1: The general scheme of a fire-alarm telegraph system embodies a central office to which notice can be sent from any number of signal boxes of the outbreak of a fire in the district covered by the box, the central office in turn calling out the nearest fire engines, and warning the fire department in general of the occurrence. Such fire alarms can be exchanged automatically, or by operators, and are sometimes associated with a large fire-alarm bell or whistle. Some boxes can be operated by the passing public; others need special keys. The box mechanism is usually of the ratchet, step-by-step movement, familiar in district messenger call-boxes.]
[Footnote 1: The basic framework of a fire-alarm telegraph system includes a central office that receives alerts from various signal boxes when a fire breaks out in the area covered by that box. The central office then dispatches the nearest fire engines and notifies the fire department about the incident. These fire alarms can either be activated automatically or by operators and are often linked to a large fire-alarm bell or whistle. Some boxes can be activated by the public; others require special keys. The mechanism in the box typically operates on a ratchet, step-by-step movement, similar to what you find in district messenger call-boxes.]
Edison's curiously practical, though imaginative, mind demanded realities to work upon, things that belong to "human nature's daily food," and he soon harked back to telegraphy, a domain in which he was destined to succeed, and over which he was to reign supreme as an inventor. He did not, however, neglect chemistry, but indulged his tastes in that direction freely, although we have no record that this work was anything more, at that time, than the carrying out of experiments outlined in the books. The foundations were being laid for the remarkable chemical knowledge that later on grappled successfully with so many knotty problems in the realm of chemistry; notably with the incandescent lamp and the storage battery. Of one incident in his chemical experiments he tells the following story: "I had read in a scientific paper the method of making nitroglycerine, and was so fired by the wonderful properties it was said to possess, that I determined to make some of the compound. We tested what we considered a very small quantity, but this produced such terrible and unexpected results that we became alarmed, the fact dawning upon us that we had a very large white elephant in our possession. At 6 A.M. I put the explosive into a sarsaparilla bottle, tied a string to it, wrapped it in a paper, and gently let it down into the sewer, corner of State and Washington Streets." The associate in this was a man whom he had found endeavoring to make electrical apparatus for sleight-of-hand performances.
Edison's uniquely practical yet imaginative mind needed real projects to engage with, things that are part of "human nature's daily food." He quickly returned to telegraphy, a field where he was destined to excel and become a leading inventor. However, he didn't ignore chemistry; he explored that area as well, although we have no records that his efforts were anything beyond following experiments outlined in books at that time. He was laying the groundwork for the impressive chemical knowledge that would later tackle many challenging problems in chemistry, particularly with the incandescent lamp and the storage battery. Regarding one instance in his chemical experiments, he shared this story: "I had read in a scientific paper the method for making nitroglycerin, and I was so excited by its incredible properties that I decided to create some of the compound. We tested what we thought was a very small amount, but this led to such shocking and unexpected results that we became frightened, realizing we had a significant danger on our hands. At 6 A.M., I placed the explosive in a sarsaparilla bottle, tied a string to it, wrapped it in paper, and carefully lowered it into the sewer at the corner of State and Washington Streets." His associate in this endeavor was a man he found trying to create electrical devices for magic tricks.
In the Boston telegraph office at that time, as perhaps at others, there were operators studying to enter college; possibly some were already in attendance at Harvard University. This condition was not unusual at one time; the first electrical engineer graduated from Columbia University, New York, followed up his studies while a night operator, and came out brilliantly at the head of his class. Edison says of these scholars that they paraded their knowledge rather freely, and that it was his delight to go to the second-hand book stores on Cornhill and study up questions which he could spring upon them when he got an occasion. With those engaged on night duty he got midnight lunch from an old Irishman called "the Cake Man," who appeared regularly with his wares at 12 midnight. "The office was on the ground floor, and had been a restaurant previous to its occupation by the Western Union Telegraph Company. It was literally loaded with cockroaches, which lived between the wall and the board running around the room at the floor, and which came after the lunch. These were such a bother on my table that I pasted two strips of tinfoil on the wall at my desk, connecting one piece to the positive pole of the big battery supplying current to the wires and the negative pole to the other strip. The cockroaches moving up on the wall would pass over the strips. The moment they got their legs across both strips there was a flash of light and the cockroaches went into gas. This automatic electrocuting device attracted so much attention, and got half a column in an evening paper, that the manager made me stop it." The reader will remember that a similar plan of campaign against rats was carried out by Edison while in the West.
In the Boston telegraph office at that time, as perhaps at other times, there were operators studying to get into college; some might have even been attending Harvard University. This wasn’t unusual at one point; the first electrical engineer to graduate from Columbia University in New York continued his studies while working as a night operator and graduated at the top of his class. Edison remarked that these scholars were quite open about their knowledge, and he enjoyed visiting the second-hand bookstores on Cornhill to study up on questions he could challenge them with when the opportunity arose. While working with those on night shifts, he would get midnight snacks from an old Irishman known as "the Cake Man," who showed up punctually with his goods at 12 midnight. "The office was on the ground floor and had been a restaurant before being taken over by the Western Union Telegraph Company. It was literally infested with cockroaches, which lived between the wall and the board that ran around the room at floor level, and they came out after lunch. They were such a nuisance at my table that I stuck two strips of tinfoil on the wall at my desk, connecting one strip to the positive pole of the large battery powering the wires and the negative pole to the other strip. The cockroaches climbing up the wall would cross over the strips. As soon as they got their legs on both strips, there would be a flash of light, and the cockroaches would get zapped. This automatic electrocution device attracted so much attention and got half a column in an evening paper that the manager made me stop using it." The reader might recall that a similar strategy against rats was used by Edison while he was in the West.
About this time Edison had a narrow escape from injury that might easily have shortened his career, and he seems to have provoked the trouble more or less innocently by using a little elementary chemistry. "After being in Boston several months," he says, "working New York wire No. 1, I was requested to work the press wire, called the 'milk route,' as there were so many towns on it taking press simultaneously. New York office had reported great delays on the wire, due to operators constantly interrupting, or 'breaking,' as it was called, to have words repeated which they had failed to get; and New York claimed that Boston was one of the worst offenders. It was a rather hard position for me, for if I took the report without breaking, it would prove the previous Boston operator incompetent. The results made the operator have some hard feelings against me. He was put back on the wire, and did much better after that. It seems that the office boy was down on this man. One night he asked me if I could tell him how to fix a key so that it would not 'break,' even if the circuit-breaker was open, and also so that it could not be easily detected. I told him to jab a penful of ink on the platinum points, as there was sugar enough to make it sufficiently thick to hold up when the operator tried to break—the current still going through the ink so that he could not break.
Around this time, Edison narrowly avoided an injury that could have cut his career short, and it seems he unwittingly stirred up trouble by dabbling in a bit of basic chemistry. "After spending several months in Boston," he says, "working New York wire No. 1, I was asked to handle the press wire, known as the 'milk route,' since there were so many towns on it sending press at the same time. The New York office had reported significant delays on the wire due to operators constantly interrupting or 'breaking,' as it was called, to ask for repeats of what they hadn't understood; and New York claimed that Boston was one of the worst offenders. It put me in a tough spot because if I took the report without breaking, it would show that the previous Boston operator wasn't competent. The outcome caused some hard feelings from that operator towards me. He was reassigned to the wire and performed much better afterward. Apparently, the office boy had it out for this operator. One night, he asked me if I could tell him how to fix a key so it wouldn't 'break,' even if the circuit-breaker was open, and also so that it couldn't be easily detected. I told him to smear a penful of ink on the platinum points, as there was enough sugar in it to make it thick enough to hold up when the operator tried to break — the current would still flow through the ink so he couldn't break."
"The next night about 1 A.M. this operator, on the press wire, while I was standing near a House printer studying it, pulled out a glass insulator, then used upside down as a substitute for an ink-bottle, and threw it with great violence at me, just missing my head. It would certainly have killed me if it had not missed. The cause of the trouble was that this operator was doing the best he could not to break, but being compelled to, opened his key and found he couldn't. The press matter came right along, and he could not stop it. The office boy had put the ink in a few minutes before, when the operator had turned his head during a lull. He blamed me instinctively as the cause of the trouble. Later on we became good friends. He took his meals at the same emaciator that I did. His main object in life seemed to be acquiring the art of throwing up wash-pitchers and catching them without breaking them. About one-third of his salary was used up in paying for pitchers."
The next night around 1 A.M., this operator on the press wire, while I was standing by a house printer checking it out, grabbed a glass insulator, turned it upside down as a makeshift ink bottle, and threw it at me with such force that it just barely missed my head. If it had hit, it definitely would have killed me. The problem was that this operator was trying really hard not to break anything but, when he had to, he opened his key and realized he couldn’t. The press matter kept coming, and he couldn't stop it. The office boy had just added the ink a few minutes earlier when the operator momentarily turned away during a lull. He instinctively blamed me for the issue. Eventually, we became good friends. He ate at the same place I did. His main focus in life seemed to be mastering the skill of throwing wash pitchers and catching them without breaking them. About a third of his salary went toward paying for those pitchers.
One day a request reached the Western Union Telegraph office in Boston, from the principal of a select school for young ladies, to the effect that she would like some one to be sent up to the school to exhibit and describe the Morse telegraph to her "children." There has always been a warm interest in Boston in the life and work of Morse, who was born there, at Charlestown, barely a mile from the birthplace of Franklin, and this request for a little lecture on Morse's telegraph was quite natural. Edison, who was always ready to earn some extra money for his experiments, and was already known as the best-informed operator in the office, accepted the invitation. What happened is described by Adams as follows: "We gathered up a couple of sounders, a battery, and sonic wire, and at the appointed time called on her to do the stunt. Her school-room was about twenty by twenty feet, not including a small platform. We rigged up the line between the two ends of the room, Edison taking the stage while I was at the other end of the room. All being in readiness, the principal was told to bring in her children. The door opened and in came about twenty young ladies elegantly gowned, not one of whom was under seventeen. When Edison saw them I thought he would faint. He called me on the line and asked me to come to the stage and explain the mysteries of the Morse system. I replied that I thought he was in the right place, and told him to get busy with his talk on dots and dashes. Always modest, Edison was so overcome he could hardly speak, but he managed to say, finally, that as his friend Mr. Adams was better equipped with cheek than he was, we would change places, and he would do the demonstrating while I explained the whole thing. This caused the bevy to turn to see where the lecturer was. I went on the stage, said something, and we did some telegraphing over the line. I guess it was satisfactory; we got the money, which was the main point to us." Edison tells the story in a similar manner, but insists that it was he who saved the situation. "I managed to say that I would work the apparatus, and Mr. Adams would make the explanations. Adams was so embarrassed that he fell over an ottoman. The girls tittered, and this increased his embarrassment until he couldn't say a word. The situation was so desperate that for a reason I never could explain I started in myself and talked and explained better than I ever did before or since. I can talk to two or three persons; but when there are more they radiate some unknown form of influence which paralyzes my vocal cords. However, I got out of this scrape, and many times afterward when I chanced with other operators to meet some of the young ladies on their way home from school, they would smile and nod, much to the mystification of the operators, who were ignorant of this episode."
One day, a request came to the Western Union Telegraph office in Boston from the principal of a girls' school. She wanted someone to come to the school to show and explain the Morse telegraph to her "students." There’s always been a strong interest in Boston regarding Morse's life and work, since he was born nearby in Charlestown, just a mile from Franklin's birthplace. So, it was natural for her to ask for a little lecture on Morse’s telegraph. Edison, always eager to make some extra money for his experiments and already known as the most knowledgeable operator in the office, accepted the invitation. What happened next is described by Adams like this: "We gathered a couple of sounders, a battery, and some wire, and at the designated time, we went to do the presentation. The classroom was about twenty by twenty feet, not counting a small platform. We set up the line across the room, with Edison on stage and I was on the other side. Once everything was ready, the principal was asked to bring in her students. The door opened, and in walked about twenty young ladies in elegant dresses, none of whom was under seventeen. When Edison saw them, I thought he might faint. He called me on the line and asked me to come up and explain the mysteries of the Morse system. I told him I thought he was the one in the right spot and encouraged him to start talking about dots and dashes. Always modest, Edison was so overwhelmed he could barely speak, but he eventually managed to suggest that since my friend Mr. Adams was more outgoing than he was, we would swap places, and he would do the demonstrating while I explained everything. This made the girls turn to see where the lecturer was. I got on stage, said a few words, and we did some telegraphing. I think it went well; we got paid, which was our main concern." Edison recounts the story similarly but insists that he was the one who saved the day. "I managed to say that I would operate the equipment while Mr. Adams would explain. Adams was so embarrassed he tripped over an ottoman. The girls giggled, which made his embarrassment worse, and he couldn’t say a thing. It got so desperate that for some reason I can’t explain, I started talking and explaining better than I ever had before or since. I can talk to two or three people, but when there are more, they seem to give off some unknown energy that makes it hard for me to speak. Still, I got through this situation, and many times afterward, when I ran into other operators and bumped into some of the young ladies on their way home from school, they would smile and nod at me, much to the confusion of the operators who had no idea about this episode."
Another amusing story of this period of impecuniosity and financial strain is told thus by Edison: "My friend Adams was working in the Franklin Telegraph Company, which competed with the Western Union. Adams was laid off, and as his financial resources had reached absolute zero centigrade, I undertook to let him sleep in my hall bedroom. I generally had hall bedrooms, because they were cheap and I needed money to buy apparatus. I also had the pleasure of his genial company at the boarding-house about a mile distant, but at the sacrifice of some apparatus. One morning, as we were hastening to breakfast, we came into Tremont Row, and saw a large crowd in front of two small 'gents' furnishing goods stores. We stopped to ascertain the cause of the excitement. One store put up a paper sign in the display window which said: 'Three-hundred pairs of stockings received this day, five cents a pair—no connection with the store next door.' Presently the other store put up a sign stating they had received three hundred pairs, price three cents per pair, and stated that they had no connection with the store next door. Nobody went in. The crowd kept increasing. Finally, when the price had reached three pairs for one cent, Adams said to me: 'I can't stand this any longer; give me a cent.' I gave him a nickel, and he elbowed his way in; and throwing the money on the counter, the store being filled with women clerks, he said: 'Give me three pairs.' The crowd was breathless, and the girl took down a box and drew out three pairs of baby socks. 'Oh!' said Adams, 'I want men's size.' 'Well, sir, we do not permit one to pick sizes for that amount of money.' And the crowd roared; and this broke up the sales."
Another funny story from this time of being broke and struggling with money goes like this, as told by Edison: "My friend Adams was working at the Franklin Telegraph Company, which was in competition with Western Union. Adams got laid off, and since his finances had hit rock bottom, I offered him a place to sleep in my hall bedroom. I mostly had hall bedrooms because they were cheap, and I needed money to buy equipment. I also got to enjoy his friendly company at the boarding house about a mile away, but it cost me some of my equipment. One morning, as we hurried to breakfast, we came across a large crowd in front of two small furniture stores. We stopped to find out what all the fuss was about. One store had a sign in the display window that read: 'Three hundred pairs of stockings received today, five cents a pair—no connection with the store next door.' Soon, the other store put up a sign saying they had received three hundred pairs as well, priced at three cents per pair, and they also claimed no connection with the store next door. Nobody went inside. The crowd just kept growing. Finally, when the price dropped to three pairs for a penny, Adams said to me: 'I can't take this any longer; give me a cent.' I handed him a nickel, and he pushed his way in; tossing the money on the counter, filled with women clerks, he said: 'Give me three pairs.' The crowd was on edge, and the clerk took down a box, pulling out three pairs of baby socks. 'Oh!' said Adams, 'I want men's size.' 'Well, sir, we don't allow picking sizes for that price.' And the crowd erupted in laughter, which ended the sales."
It has generally been supposed that Edison did not take up work on the stock ticker until after his arrival a little later in New York; but he says: "After the vote-recorder I invented a stock ticker, and started a ticker service in Boston; had thirty or forty subscribers, and operated from a room over the Gold Exchange. This was about a year after Callahan started in New York." To say the least, this evidenced great ability and enterprise on the part of the youth. The dealings in gold during the Civil War and after its close had brought gold indicators into use, and these had soon been followed by "stock tickers," the first of which was introduced in New York in 1867. The success of this new but still primitively crude class of apparatus was immediate. Four manufacturers were soon busy trying to keep pace with the demands for it from brokers; and the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company formed to exploit the system soon increased its capital from $200,000 to $300,000, paying 12 per cent. dividends on the latter amount. Within its first year the capital was again increased to $1,000,000, and dividends of 10 per cent. were paid easily on that sum also. It is needless to say that such facts became quickly known among the operators, from whose ranks, of course, the new employees were enlisted; and it was a common ambition among the more ingenious to produce a new ticker. From the beginning, each phase of electrical development—indeed, each step in mechanics—has been accompanied by the well-known phenomenon of invention; namely, the attempt of the many to perfect and refine and even re-invent where one or two daring spirits have led the way. The figures of capitalization and profit just mentioned were relatively much larger in the sixties than they are to-day; and to impressionable young operators they spelled illimitable wealth. Edison was, how ever, about the only one in Boston of whom history makes record as achieving any tangible result in this new art; and he soon longed for the larger telegraphic opportunity of New York. His friend, Milt Adams, went West with quenchless zest for that kind of roving life and aimless adventure of which the serious minded Edison had already had more than enough. Realizing that to New York he must look for further support in his efforts, Edison, deep in debt for his embryonic inventions, but with high hope and courage, now made the next momentous step in his career. He was far riper in experience and practice of his art than any other telegrapher of his age, and had acquired, moreover, no little knowledge of the practical business of life. Note has been made above of his invention of a stock ticker in Boston, and of his establishing a stock-quotation circuit. This was by no means all, and as a fitting close to this chapter he may be quoted as to some other work and its perils in experimentation: "I also engaged in putting up private lines, upon which I used an alphabetical dial instrument for telegraphing between business establishments, a forerunner of modern telephony. This instrument was very simple and practical, and any one could work it after a few minutes' explanation. I had these instruments made at Mr. Hamblet's, who had a little shop where he was engaged in experimenting with electric clocks. Mr. Hamblet was the father and introducer in after years of the Western Union Telegraph system of time distribution. My laboratory was the headquarters for the men, and also of tools and supplies for those private lines. They were put up cheaply, as I used the roofs of houses, just as the Western Union did. It never occurred to me to ask permission from the owners; all we did was to go to the store, etc., say we were telegraph men, and wanted to go up to the wires on the roof; and permission was always granted.
It was generally thought that Edison didn't start working on the stock ticker until after he arrived in New York, but he said, "After the vote-recorder, I invented a stock ticker and launched a ticker service in Boston; I had thirty or forty subscribers and operated from a room above the Gold Exchange. This was about a year after Callahan started in New York." This showed remarkable skill and initiative on the part of the young man. The trading in gold during the Civil War and afterward had led to the use of gold indicators, which were quickly followed by "stock tickers," the first of which was introduced in New York in 1867. The success of this new but still quite basic kind of device was immediate. Four manufacturers were quickly busy trying to keep up with the demand from brokers; and the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, formed to develop the system, soon increased its capital from $200,000 to $300,000, paying 12 percent dividends on that amount. Within its first year, the capital was again raised to $1,000,000, and dividends of 10 percent were easily paid on that sum as well. It's needless to say that these facts quickly became known among the operators, whose ranks, of course, provided the new employees; and it was a common goal among the more inventive to create a new ticker. From the outset, each stage of electrical development—indeed, every step in mechanics—has been accompanied by the well-known phenomenon of invention; namely, the attempts of many to improve, refine, and even reinvent what one or two bold individuals have pioneered. The figures for capital and profit mentioned earlier were relatively much larger in the sixties than they are today; and to impressionable young operators, they represented limitless wealth. However, Edison was about the only one in Boston who made a significant mark in this new field; and he soon yearned for the greater telegraphic opportunities of New York. His friend, Milt Adams, ventured West with an insatiable appetite for the kind of adventurous and aimless life that serious-minded Edison had already experienced too much of. Realizing that he needed to look to New York for further support in his endeavors, Edison, deeply in debt from his early inventions but filled with hope and courage, took the next crucial step in his career. He was more experienced and skilled in his art than any other telegrapher of his age and had gained considerable practical knowledge about life’s business. As noted earlier, he invented a stock ticker in Boston and set up a stock-quotation circuit. But that wasn’t all, and as a fitting conclusion to this chapter, he mentioned some other work and the risks involved in experimenting: "I also engaged in setting up private lines, using an alphabetical dial instrument for telegraphing between businesses, a precursor to modern telephony. This instrument was very simple and practical, and anyone could operate it after just a few minutes of instruction. I had these instruments made at Mr. Hamblet's shop, where he was experimenting with electric clocks. Mr. Hamblet would later be known as the creator and introducer of the Western Union Telegraph system of time distribution. My lab served as the headquarters for the staff and also housed tools and supplies for those private lines. They were installed cheaply since I used the rooftops of buildings, just like Western Union did. It never occurred to me to ask the owners for permission; we simply went to the store, stated we were telegraph men, and asked to access the wires on the roof; permission was always granted."
"In this laboratory I had a large induction coil which I had borrowed to make some experiments with. One day I got hold of both electrodes of the coil, and it clinched my hand on them so that I couldn't let go. The battery was on a shelf. The only way I could get free was to back off and pull the coil, so that the battery wires would pull the cells off the shelf and thus break the circuit. I shut my eyes and pulled, but the nitric acid splashed all over my face and ran down my back. I rushed to a sink, which was only half big enough, and got in as well as I could and wiggled around for several minutes to permit the water to dilute the acid and stop the pain. My face and back were streaked with yellow; the skin was thoroughly oxidized. I did not go on the street by daylight for two weeks, as the appearance of my face was dreadful. The skin, however, peeled off, and new skin replaced it without any damage."
"In this lab, I had a large induction coil that I had borrowed to do some experiments. One day, I grabbed both electrodes of the coil and it locked my hand on them so I couldn't let go. The battery was on a shelf. The only way I could free myself was to pull the coil back, which would yank the battery wires enough to knock the cells off the shelf and break the circuit. I closed my eyes and pulled, but the nitric acid splashed all over my face and ran down my back. I rushed to a sink, which was only half big enough, and squeezed in as best as I could, wiggling around for several minutes to let the water dilute the acid and stop the pain. My face and back were streaked with yellow; my skin was thoroughly oxidized. I didn’t go outside during the day for two weeks because my face looked terrible. However, the skin peeled off and new skin grew back without any damage."
CHAPTER VII
THE STOCK TICKER
"THE letters and figures used in the language of the tape," said a well-known Boston stock speculator, "are very few, but they spell ruin in ninety-nine million ways." It is not to be inferred, however, that the modern stock ticker has anything to do with the making or losing of fortunes. There were regular daily stock-market reports in London newspapers in 1825, and New York soon followed the example. As far back as 1692, Houghton issued in London a weekly review of financial and commercial transactions, upon which Macaulay based the lively narrative of stock speculation in the seventeenth century, given in his famous history. That which the ubiquitous stock ticker has done is to give instantaneity to the news of what the stock market is doing, so that at every minute, thousands of miles apart, brokers, investors, and gamblers may learn the exact conditions. The existence of such facilities is to be admired rather than deplored. News is vital to Wall Street, and there is no living man on whom the doings in Wall Street are without effect. The financial history of the United States and of the world, as shown by the prices of government bonds and general securities, has been told daily for forty years on these narrow strips of paper tape, of which thousands of miles are run yearly through the "tickers" of New York alone. It is true that the record of the chattering little machine, made in cabalistic abbreviations on the tape, can drive a man suddenly to the very verge of insanity with joy or despair; but if there be blame for that, it attaches to the American spirit of speculation and not to the ingenious mechanism which reads and registers the beating of the financial pulse.
"THE letters and numbers used in the language of the ticker," said a well-known stock speculator from Boston, "are very few, but they result in ruin in ninety-nine million ways." However, it shouldn't be assumed that the modern stock ticker has anything to do with making or losing fortunes. There were daily stock-market reports in London newspapers as early as 1825, and New York soon followed suit. As far back as 1692, Houghton published a weekly review of financial and commercial transactions in London, which Macaulay used as the basis for his lively account of stock speculation in the seventeenth century, as described in his famous history. What the ever-present ticker has done is provide immediate updates on stock market activity, allowing brokers, investors, and gamblers separated by thousands of miles to stay informed about exact conditions every minute. This kind of accessibility should be admired rather than criticized. News is crucial for Wall Street, and there’s no one alive who isn’t affected by what happens there. The financial history of the United States and the world, as reflected in the prices of government bonds and general securities, has been reported daily for forty years on these narrow strips of tape, with thousands of miles produced each year in New York's tickers alone. It’s true that the record from that little machine, filled with cryptic abbreviations on the tape, can drive someone to the brink of madness through joy or despair; but if blame is to be assigned for that, it should go to the American spirit of speculation, not to the clever technology that captures and displays the rhythm of the financial markets.
Edison came first to New York in 1868, with his early stock printer, which he tried unsuccessfully to sell. He went back to Boston, and quite undismayed got up a duplex telegraph. "Toward the end of my stay in Boston," he says, "I obtained a loan of money, amounting to $800, to build a peculiar kind of duplex telegraph for sending two messages over a single wire simultaneously. The apparatus was built, and I left the Western Union employ and went to Rochester, New York, to test the apparatus on the lines of the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph between that city and New York. But the assistant at the other end could not be made to understand anything, notwithstanding I had written out a very minute description of just what to do. After trying for a week I gave it up and returned to New York with but a few cents in my pocket." Thus he who has never speculated in a stock in his life was destined to make the beginnings of his own fortune by providing for others the apparatus that should bring to the eye, all over a great city, the momentary fluctuations of stocks and bonds. No one could have been in direr poverty than he when the steamboat landed him in New York in 1869. He was in debt, and his few belongings in books and instruments had to be left behind. He was not far from starving. Mr. W. S. Mallory, an associate of many years, quotes directly from him on this point: "Some years ago we had a business negotiation in New York which made it necessary for Mr. Edison and me to visit the city five or six times within a comparatively short period. It was our custom to leave Orange about 11 A.M., and on arrival in New York to get our lunch before keeping the appointments, which were usually made for two o'clock. Several of these lunches were had at Delmonico's, Sherry's, and other places of similar character, but one day, while en route, Mr. Edison said: 'I have been to lunch with you several times; now to-day I am going to take you to lunch with me, and give you the finest lunch you ever had.' When we arrived in Hoboken, we took the downtown ferry across the Hudson, and when we arrived on the Manhattan side Mr. Edison led the way to Smith & McNell's, opposite Washington Market, and well known to old New Yorkers. We went inside and as soon as the waiter appeared Mr. Edison ordered apple dumplings and a cup of coffee for himself. He consumed his share of the lunch with the greatest possible pleasure. Then, as soon as he had finished, he went to the cigar counter and purchased cigars. As we walked to keep the appointment he gave me the following reminiscence: When he left Boston and decided to come to New York he had only money enough for the trip. After leaving the boat his first thought was of breakfast; but he was without money to obtain it. However, in passing a wholesale tea-house he saw a man tasting tea, so he went in and asked the 'taster' if he might have some of the tea. This the man gave him, and thus he obtained his first breakfast in New York. He knew a telegraph operator here, and on him he depended for a loan to tide him over until such time as he should secure a position. During the day he succeeded in locating this operator, but found that he also was out of a job, and that the best he could do was to loan him one dollar, which he did. This small sum of money represented both food and lodging until such time as work could be obtained. Edison said that as the result of the time consumed and the exercise in walking while he found his friend, he was extremely hungry, and that he gave most serious consideration as to what he should buy in the way of food, and what particular kind of food would be most satisfying and filling. The result was that at Smith & McNell's he decided on apple dumplings and a cup of coffee, than which he never ate anything more appetizing. It was not long before he was at work and was able to live in a normal manner."
Edison first visited New York in 1868 with his early stock printer, which he failed to sell. He returned to Boston and, undeterred, developed a duplex telegraph. "Toward the end of my time in Boston," he says, "I got an $800 loan to create a special type of duplex telegraph that could send two messages over a single wire at the same time. The equipment was built, and I left Western Union to go to Rochester, New York, to test it on the lines of the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph between that city and New York. But the assistant at the other end couldn’t understand anything, even though I had written a very detailed description of exactly what to do. After a week of trying, I gave up and returned to New York with just a few cents in my pocket." Thus, he, who had never invested in stocks in his life, was destined to begin building his own fortune by providing others with the tools to track the immediate fluctuations of stocks and bonds across a major city. No one could have been in worse poverty than he when the steamboat dropped him off in New York in 1869. He was in debt, and he had to leave most of his few belongings, including books and instruments, behind. He was nearly starving. Mr. W. S. Mallory, a long-time associate, recalls an experience he shared with Edison: "A few years ago, Mr. Edison and I had business meetings in New York that required us to visit the city five or six times over a relatively short period. We usually left Orange around 11 A.M., and when we arrived in New York, we’d grab lunch before our appointments, which were typically set for two o'clock. Some of our lunches were at Delmonico’s, Sherry’s, and other similar places, but one day, while traveling, Mr. Edison said: 'I’ve taken you to lunch several times; today I’m going to treat you to the best lunch you’ve ever had.' When we reached Hoboken, we took the downtown ferry across the Hudson, and upon arriving on Manhattan, Mr. Edison led us to Smith & McNell's, which was across from Washington Market and well-known to old New Yorkers. We went inside, and as soon as the waiter arrived, Mr. Edison ordered apple dumplings and a cup of coffee for himself. He enjoyed his meal immensely. Once he finished, he went to the cigar counter to buy cigars. As we walked to our appointment, he shared this memory with me: When he left Boston for New York, he only had enough money for the trip. After getting off the boat, his first thought was about breakfast, but he had no money to buy it. While passing a wholesale tea house, he saw a man tasting tea, so he went in and asked the 'taster' if he could have some. The man gave him some tea, and that was how he got his first breakfast in New York. He knew a telegraph operator there and was counting on him for a loan to help him get by until he found a job. That day, he managed to find this operator, but he discovered that he was also unemployed and could only lend him a dollar, which he did. This small amount meant food and a place to stay until he could find work. Edison said that due to the time spent walking while looking for his friend, he was really hungry and carefully considered what to buy for food, thinking about what would be most satisfying. In the end, at Smith & McNell's, he chose apple dumplings and a cup of coffee, which he found to be the most delicious thing he ever had. It wasn’t long before he found work and could live normally."
During the Civil War, with its enormous increase in the national debt and the volume of paper money, gold had gone to a high premium; and, as ever, by its fluctuations in price the value of all other commodities was determined. This led to the creation of a "Gold Room" in Wall Street, where the precious metal could be dealt in; while for dealings in stocks there also existed the "Regular Board," the "Open Board," and the "Long Room." Devoted to one, but the leading object of speculation, the "Gold Room" was the very focus of all the financial and gambling activity of the time, and its quotations governed trade and commerce. At first notations in chalk on a blackboard sufficed, but seeing their inadequacy, Dr. S. S. Laws, vice-president and actual presiding officer of the Gold Exchange, devised and introduced what was popularly known as the "gold indicator." This exhibited merely the prevailing price of gold; but as its quotations changed from instant to instant, it was in a most literal sense "the cynosure of neighboring eyes." One indicator looked upon the Gold Room; the other opened toward the street. Within the exchange the face could easily be seen high up on the west wall of the room, and the machine was operated by Mr. Mersereau, the official registrar of the Gold Board.
During the Civil War, the national debt skyrocketed and the amount of paper money increased significantly, causing gold prices to soar. As always, the price of gold influenced the value of all other goods. This resulted in the establishment of a "Gold Room" on Wall Street for trading the precious metal. For stock trading, there were also the "Regular Board," the "Open Board," and the "Long Room." Focused on speculation, the "Gold Room" became the center of all financial and gambling activities at the time, with its prices dictating trade and commerce. Initially, prices were noted in chalk on a blackboard, but this soon proved inadequate. Dr. S. S. Laws, the vice-president and presiding officer of the Gold Exchange, created the "gold indicator," which displayed the current price of gold. As prices changed quickly, it literally became "the cynosure of neighboring eyes." One indicator faced the Gold Room, while the other faced the street. Inside the exchange, the indicator was prominently displayed high on the west wall, and it was operated by Mr. Mersereau, the official registrar of the Gold Board.
Doctor Laws, who afterward became President of the State University of Missouri, was an inventor of unusual ability and attainments. In his early youth he had earned his livelihood in a tool factory; and, apparently with his savings, he went to Princeton, where he studied electricity under no less a teacher than the famous Joseph Henry. At the outbreak of the war in 1861 he was president of one of the Presbyterian synodical colleges in the South, whose buildings passed into the hands of the Government. Going to Europe, he returned to New York in 1863, and, becoming interested with a relative in financial matters, his connection with the Gold Exchange soon followed, when it was organized. The indicating mechanism he now devised was electrical, controlled at central by two circuit-closing keys, and was a prototype of all the later and modern step-by-step printing telegraphs, upon which the distribution of financial news depends. The "fraction" drum of the indicator could be driven in either direction, known as the advance and retrograde movements, and was divided and marked in eighths. It geared into a "unit" drum, just as do speed-indicators and cyclometers. Four electrical pulsations were required to move the drum the distance between the fractions. The general operation was simple, and in normally active times the mechanism and the registrar were equal to all emergencies. But it is obvious that the record had to be carried away to the brokers' offices and other places by messengers; and the delay, confusion, and mistakes soon suggested to Doctor Laws the desirability of having a number of indicators at such scattered points, operated by a master transmitter, and dispensing with the regiments of noisy boys. He secured this privilege of distribution, and, resigning from the exchange, devoted his exclusive attention to the "Gold Reporting Telegraph," which he patented, and for which, at the end of 1866, he had secured fifty subscribers. His indicators were small oblong boxes, in the front of which was a long slot, allowing the dials as they travelled past, inside, to show the numerals constituting the quotation; the dials or wheels being arranged in a row horizontally, overlapping each other, as in modern fare registers which are now seen on most trolley cars. It was not long before there were three hundred subscribers; but the very success of this device brought competition and improvement. Mr. E. A. Callahan, an ingenious printing-telegraph operator, saw that there were unexhausted possibilities in the idea, and his foresight and inventiveness made him the father of the "ticker," in connection with which he was thus, like Laws, one of the first to grasp and exploit the underlying principle of the "central station" as a universal source of supply. The genesis of his invention Mr. Callahan has told in an interesting way: "In 1867, on the site of the present Mills Building on Broad Street, opposite the Stock Exchange of today, was an old building which had been cut up to subserve the necessities of its occupants, all engaged in dealing in gold and stocks. It had one main entrance from the street to a hallway, from which entrance to the offices of two prominent broker firms was obtained. Each firm had its own army of boys, numbering from twelve to fifteen, whose duties were to ascertain the latest quotations from the different exchanges. Each boy devoted his attention to some particularly active stock. Pushing each other to get into these narrow quarters, yelling out the prices at the door, and pushing back for later ones, the hustle made this doorway to me a most undesirable refuge from an April shower. I was simply whirled into the street. I naturally thought that much of this noise and confusion might be dispensed with, and that the prices might be furnished through some system of telegraphy which would not require the employment of skilled operators. The conception of the stock ticker dates from this incident."
Doctor Laws, who later became President of the State University of Missouri, was an exceptionally talented inventor. In his early years, he made a living working in a tool factory, and with his savings, he went to Princeton to study electricity with the renowned Joseph Henry. At the start of the war in 1861, he was president of a Presbyterian synodical college in the South, which was taken over by the Government. He traveled to Europe and returned to New York in 1863, where he got involved in financial matters with a relative and soon joined the Gold Exchange when it was established. He developed an electrical indicating mechanism controlled centrally by two circuit-closing keys, which became a model for later step-by-step printing telegraphs that distribute financial news. The "fraction" drum of the indicator could move in both directions, known as advance and retrograde, and was marked in eighths. It connected to a "unit" drum, similar to speed indicators and cyclometers. Four electrical pulses were needed to move the drum the distance between fractions. The overall operation was straightforward, and during normal times, the mechanism and registrar could handle any emergencies. However, it was clear that records had to be sent by messengers to brokers' offices and other locations, causing delays, confusion, and errors. This led Doctor Laws to realize the need for several indicators at various locations, operated by a master transmitter, eliminating the need for noisy messengers. He obtained permission for this distribution and, after resigning from the exchange, focused entirely on the "Gold Reporting Telegraph," which he patented. By the end of 1866, he had secured fifty subscribers. His indicators were small, rectangular boxes with a long slot at the front, allowing the dials inside to display the numerals of the quotations. The dials, arranged in a horizontal row overlapping each other, were similar to the fare registers seen on most trolley cars today. It didn't take long for the subscriber count to reach three hundred; however, his success attracted competition and innovation. Mr. E. A. Callahan, a clever printing-telegraph operator, recognized that there were more possibilities in this concept. His insight and inventiveness led him to create the "ticker" and, like Laws, be among the first to understand and utilize the foundational idea of a "central station" as a universal supply source. Mr. Callahan recounts the origin of his invention in an engaging manner: "In 1867, at the site of today's Mills Building on Broad Street, opposite the current Stock Exchange, stood an old building that had been modified to meet the needs of its gold and stock trading occupants. It had one main entrance leading to a hallway, giving access to the offices of two well-known broker firms. Each firm had an army of boys, around twelve to fifteen, tasked with getting the latest quotes from various exchanges, with each boy focusing on a specific active stock. As they pushed each other to get into those cramped spaces, yelling out prices at the door, and waiting for the later ones, the chaos made that doorway a terrible place to escape an April rain. I was practically shoved back out into the street. It struck me that most of this noise and confusion could be avoided, and that prices could be provided through some telegraphy system that didn't need skilled operators. The idea for the stock ticker originated from this experience."
Mr. Callahan's first idea was to distribute gold quotations, and to this end he devised an "indicator." It consisted of two dials mounted separately, each revolved by an electromagnet, so that the desired figures were brought to an aperture in the case enclosing the apparatus, as in the Laws system. Each shaft with its dial was provided with two ratchet wheels, one the reverse of the other. One was used in connection with the propelling lever, which was provided with a pawl to fit into the teeth of the reversed ratchet wheel on its forward movement. It was thus made impossible for either dial to go by momentum beyond its limit. Learning that Doctor Laws, with the skilful aid of F. L. Pope, was already active in the same direction, Mr. Callahan, with ready wit, transformed his indicator into a "ticker" that would make a printed record. The name of the "ticker" came through the casual remark of an observer to whom the noise was the most striking feature of the mechanism. Mr. Callahan removed the two dials, and, substituting type wheels, turned the movements face to face, so that each type wheel could imprint its characters upon a paper tape in two lines. Three wires stranded together ran from the central office to each instrument. Of these one furnished the current for the alphabet wheel, one for the figure wheel, and one for the mechanism that took care of the inking and printing on the tape. Callahan made the further innovation of insulating his circuit wires, although the cost was then forty times as great as that of bare wire. It will be understood that electromagnets were the ticker's actuating agency. The ticker apparatus was placed under a neat glass shade and mounted on a shelf. Twenty-five instruments were energized from one circuit, and the quotations were supplied from a "central" at 18 New Street. The Gold & Stock Telegraph Company was promptly organized to supply to brokers the system, which was very rapidly adopted throughout the financial district of New York, at the southern tip of Manhattan Island. Quotations were transmitted by the Morse telegraph from the floor of the Stock Exchange to the "central," and thence distributed to the subscribers. Success with the "stock" news system was instantaneous.
Mr. Callahan's first idea was to distribute gold prices, so he created an "indicator." It featured two separate dials, each powered by an electromagnet, bringing the desired numbers to a window in the case that housed the device, similar to the Laws system. Each dial had two ratchet wheels, one facing the opposite direction of the other. One wheel worked with a lever that had a pawl fitting into the teeth of the reversed ratchet wheel during its forward movement. This design prevented either dial from overshooting its limit due to momentum. When Mr. Callahan learned that Doctor Laws, with the skilled help of F. L. Pope, was already working on something similar, he quickly adapted his indicator into a "ticker" that would create a printed record. The name "ticker" came from a casual remark by an observer who found the sound of the mechanism to be its most notable feature. Mr. Callahan removed the two dials and replaced them with type wheels, positioning them face-to-face so that each type wheel could print its characters on a paper tape in two lines. Three wires twisted together connected the central office to each device. One wire provided power for the alphabet wheel, one for the figure wheel, and one for the mechanism that managed the inking and printing on the tape. Callahan also innovated by insulating his circuit wires, even though it was then forty times more expensive than bare wire. It’s important to note that electromagnets were the driving force behind the ticker. The ticker setup was placed under a neat glass cover and mounted on a shelf. Twenty-five devices were powered from a single circuit, and the prices were sent from a "central" at 18 New Street. The Gold & Stock Telegraph Company was quickly formed to provide brokers with the system, which was rapidly adopted throughout New York's financial district at the southern end of Manhattan Island. Prices were transmitted via Morse telegraph from the Stock Exchange floor to the "central," and then distributed to the subscribers. The "stock" news system saw instant success.
It was at this juncture that Edison reached New York, and according to his own statement found shelter at night in the battery-room of the Gold Indicator Company, having meantime applied for a position as operator with the Western Union. He had to wait a few days, and during this time he seized the opportunity to study the indicators and the complicated general transmitter in the office, controlled from the keyboard of the operator on the floor of the Gold Exchange. What happened next has been the basis of many inaccurate stories, but is dramatic enough as told in Mr. Edison's own version: "On the third day of my arrival and while sitting in the office, the complicated general instrument for sending on all the lines, and which made a very great noise, suddenly came to a stop with a crash. Within two minutes over three hundred boys—a boy from every broker in the street—rushed up-stairs and crowded the long aisle and office, that hardly had room for one hundred, all yelling that such and such a broker's wire was out of order and to fix it at once. It was pandemonium, and the man in charge became so excited that he lost control of all the knowledge he ever had. I went to the indicator, and, having studied it thoroughly, knew where the trouble ought to be, and found it. One of the innumerable contact springs had broken off and had fallen down between the two gear wheels and stopped the instrument; but it was not very noticeable. As I went out to tell the man in charge what the matter was, Doctor Laws appeared on the scene, the most excited person I had seen. He demanded of the man the cause of the trouble, but the man was speechless. I ventured to say that I knew what the trouble was, and he said, 'Fix it! Fix it! Be quick!' I removed the spring and set the contact wheels at zero; and the line, battery, and inspecting men all scattered through the financial district to set the instruments. In about two hours things were working again. Doctor Laws came in to ask my name and what I was doing. I told him, and he asked me to come to his private office the following day. His office was filled with stacks of books all relating to metaphysics and kindred matters. He asked me a great many questions about the instruments and his system, and I showed him how he could simplify things generally. He then requested that I should call next day. On arrival, he stated at once that he had decided to put me in charge of the whole plant, and that my salary would be $300 per month! This was such a violent jump from anything I had ever seen before, that it rather paralyzed me for a while, I thought it was too much to be lasting, but I determined to try and live up to that salary if twenty hours a day of hard work would do it. I kept this position, made many improvements, devised several stock tickers, until the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company consolidated with the Gold Indicator Company." Certainly few changes in fortune have been more sudden and dramatic in any notable career than this which thus placed an ill-clad, unkempt, half-starved, eager lad in a position of such responsibility in days when the fluctuations in the price of gold at every instant meant fortune or ruin to thousands.
It was at this point that Edison arrived in New York, and according to his own account, he found a place to stay at night in the battery room of the Gold Indicator Company, having also applied for a job as an operator with Western Union. He had to wait a few days, and during this time he took the chance to study the indicators and the complex general transmitter in the office, which was controlled from the operator's keyboard on the floor of the Gold Exchange. What happened next has led to many inaccurate stories, but it’s dramatic enough as Edison tells it: "On the third day of my arrival, while sitting in the office, the complex general instrument that sent signals on all the lines and made a lot of noise suddenly stopped with a crash. Within two minutes, over three hundred boys—a boy from every broker on the street—rushed upstairs and crowded the long aisle and office, which barely had space for one hundred people, all shouting that a certain broker's wire was down and needed to be fixed immediately. It was chaos, and the man in charge became so flustered that he lost all the knowledge he ever had. I went to the indicator, and having studied it thoroughly, I knew where the problem was and found it. One of the many contact springs had broken off and fallen between the two gear wheels, stopping the instrument, but it wasn’t very noticeable. As I went out to tell the man in charge what the issue was, Doctor Laws appeared, the most excited person I had ever seen. He asked the man what caused the trouble, but the man was speechless. I took the chance to say that I knew what the problem was, and he said, 'Fix it! Fix it! Be quick!' I removed the spring and set the contact wheels to zero; then the line, battery, and inspecting guys scattered through the financial district to fix the instruments. In about two hours, everything was working again. Doctor Laws came in to ask my name and what I was doing. I told him, and he asked me to come to his private office the next day. His office was filled with piles of books all about metaphysics and related topics. He asked me many questions about the instruments and his system, and I showed him how he could simplify things overall. He then asked me to return the next day. When I arrived, he immediately told me that he decided to put me in charge of the whole operation, and that my salary would be $300 a month! This was such a huge leap from anything I had ever experienced before that it left me momentarily stunned. I thought it was too good to last, but I resolved to try to earn that salary, even if it meant working twenty hours a day. I kept this position, made many improvements, and developed several stock tickers until the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company merged with the Gold Indicator Company." Certainly, few changes in fortune have been as sudden and dramatic in any notable career as this one, which placed a poorly dressed, disheveled, half-starved, eager young man in a position of such responsibility at a time when the fluctuations in the price of gold at any moment meant wealth or ruin for thousands.
Edison, barely twenty-one years old, was a keen observer of the stirring events around him. "Wall Street" is at any time an interesting study, but it was never at a more agitated and sensational period of its history than at this time. Edison's arrival in New York coincided with an active speculation in gold which may, indeed, be said to have provided him with occupation; and was soon followed by the attempt of Mr. Jay Gould and his associates to corner the gold market, precipitating the panic of Black Friday, September 24, 1869. Securing its import duties in the precious metal and thus assisting to create an artificial stringency in the gold market, the Government had made it a practice to relieve the situation by selling a million of gold each month. The metal was thus restored to circulation. In some manner, President Grant was persuaded that general conditions and the movement of the crops would be helped if the sale of gold were suspended for a time; and, this put into effect, he went to visit an old friend in Pennsylvania remote from railroads and telegraphs. The Gould pool had acquired control of $10,000,000 in gold, and drove the price upward rapidly from 144 toward their goal of 200. On Black Friday they purchased another $28,000,000 at 160, and still the price went up. The financial and commercial interests of the country were in panic; but the pool persevered in its effort to corner gold, with a profit of many millions contingent on success. Yielding to frantic requests, President Grant, who returned to Washington, caused Secretary Boutwell, of the Treasury, to throw $4,000,000 of gold into the market. Relief was instantaneous, the corner was broken, but the harm had been done. Edison's remarks shed a vivid side-light on this extraordinary episode: "On Black Friday," he says, "we had a very exciting time with the indicators. The Gould and Fisk crowd had cornered gold, and had run the quotations up faster than the indicator could follow. The indicator was composed of several wheels; on the circumference of each wheel were the numerals; and one wheel had fractions. It worked in the same way as an ordinary counter; one wheel made ten revolutions, and at the tenth it advanced the adjacent wheel; and this in its turn having gone ten revolutions, advanced the next wheel, and so on. On the morning of Black Friday the indicator was quoting 150 premium, whereas the bids by Gould's agents in the Gold Room were 165 for five millions or any part. We had a paper-weight at the transmitter (to speed it up), and by one o'clock reached the right quotation. The excitement was prodigious. New Street, as well as Broad Street, was jammed with excited people. I sat on the top of the Western Union telegraph booth to watch the surging, crazy crowd. One man came to the booth, grabbed a pencil, and attempted to write a message to Boston. The first stroke went clear off the blank; he was so excited that he had the operator write the message for him. Amid great excitement Speyer, the banker, went crazy and it took five men to hold him; and everybody lost their head. The Western Union operator came to me and said: 'Shake, Edison, we are O. K. We haven't got a cent.' I felt very happy because we were poor. These occasions are very enjoyable to a poor man; but they occur rarely."
Edison, just twenty-one years old, was a keen observer of the intense events happening around him. "Wall Street" is always an interesting place to study, but it was never more chaotic and sensational than it was at this time. Edison's arrival in New York coincided with a frenzy of gold speculation that provided him with plenty to focus on, which was soon followed by Mr. Jay Gould and his associates' attempt to corner the gold market, leading to the panic known as Black Friday on September 24, 1869. The government, by securing import duties on gold and thereby creating an artificial tightness in the gold market, had established a practice of alleviating the situation by selling a million dollars' worth of gold each month. This action restored gold to circulation. Somehow, President Grant was convinced that overall conditions and crop movements would improve if gold sales were paused for a period; following this advice, he set off to visit an old friend in Pennsylvania, far from railroads and telegraphs. The Gould group had gained control of $10 million in gold and drove the price rapidly up from 144 toward their target of 200. On Black Friday, they purchased another $28 million at 160, and yet the price continued to climb. The financial and commercial sectors of the country were in a state of panic, but the pool continued its attempt to corner the gold market, banking on a potential profit of millions. Responding to desperate calls for help, President Grant returned to Washington and had Treasury Secretary Boutwell release $4 million of gold into the market. The relief was immediate, the corner was broken, but the damage was done. Edison's observations provide a vivid perspective on this unusual event: "On Black Friday," he says, "we had a really exciting time with the indicators. The Gould and Fisk crowd had cornered gold and pushed the prices up faster than the indicator could keep up. The indicator was made of several wheels; the numbers were on the circumference of each wheel, and one wheel included fractions. It worked like a regular counter; one wheel made ten spins, and with every tenth spin, it advanced the adjacent wheel, which then triggered the next wheel after its own ten revolutions, and so on. On the morning of Black Friday, the indicator showed a premium of 150, while Gould's agents were offering 165 in the Gold Room for five million or any part of it. We had a paperweight at the transmitter (to speed it up), and by one o'clock, we reached the correct quotation. The excitement was huge. New Street, as well as Broad Street, was packed with excited people. I sat on top of the Western Union telegraph booth, watching the surging, frenzied crowd. One man approached the booth, grabbed a pencil, and tried to write a message to Boston. His first stroke went way off the page; he was so hyped up that he had the operator write the message for him. Amid all the commotion, Speyer, the banker, went wild and it took five men to hold him down; everyone was losing their cool. The Western Union operator came to me and said, 'Shake, Edison, we're O.K. We don’t have a cent.' I felt really happy because we were broke. These moments are really enjoyable for a poor guy; but they don’t happen often."
There is a calm sense of detachment about this description that has been possessed by the narrator even in the most anxious moments of his career. He was determined to see all that could be seen, and, quitting his perch on the telegraph booth, sought the more secluded headquarters of the pool forces. "A friend of mine was an operator who worked in the office of Belden & Company, 60 Broadway, which were headquarters for Fisk. Mr. Gould was up-town in the Erie offices in the Grand Opera House. The firm on Broad Street, Smith, Gould & Martin, was the other branch. All were connected with wires. Gould seemed to be in charge, Fisk being the executive down-town. Fisk wore a velvet corduroy coat and a very peculiar vest. He was very chipper, and seemed to be light-hearted and happy. Sitting around the room were about a dozen fine-looking men. All had the complexion of cadavers. There was a basket of champagne. Hundreds of boys were rushing in paying checks, all checks being payable to Belden & Company. When James Brown, of Brown Brothers & Company, broke the corner by selling five million gold, all payments were repudiated by Smith, Gould & Martin; but they continued to receive checks at Belden & Company's for some time, until the Street got wind of the game. There was some kind of conspiracy with the Government people which I could not make out, but I heard messages that opened my eyes as to the ramifications of Wall Street. Gold fell to 132, and it took us all night to get the indicator back to that quotation. All night long the streets were full of people. Every broker's office was brilliantly lighted all night, and all hands were at work. The clearing-house for gold had been swamped, and all was mixed up. No one knew if he was bankrupt or not."
There’s a calm detachment in this description that the narrator has felt even during the most stressful times of his career. He was determined to see everything he could, and leaving his spot at the telegraph booth, he went to the more private headquarters of the pool forces. "A friend of mine was an operator at Belden & Company, 60 Broadway, which was the headquarters for Fisk. Mr. Gould was up-town in the Erie offices at the Grand Opera House. The firm on Broad Street, Smith, Gould & Martin, was the other branch. All were connected with wires. Gould seemed to be in charge, with Fisk managing things downtown. Fisk wore a velvet corduroy jacket and a very unusual vest. He was cheerful and seemed light-hearted and happy. Sitting around the room were about a dozen well-dressed men, all looking pale like cadavers. There was a basket of champagne. Hundreds of boys rushed in to pay checks, all of which were payable to Belden & Company. When James Brown of Brown Brothers & Company broke the corner by selling five million in gold, all payments were rejected by Smith, Gould & Martin; however, they continued to accept checks at Belden & Company for a while, until people on Wall Street caught on. There seemed to be some kind of conspiracy with the government officials that I couldn't figure out, but I heard messages that opened my eyes to the complexities of Wall Street. Gold dropped to 132, and it took us all night to get the indicator back to that price. All night long the streets were filled with people. Every broker's office was brightly lit all night, and everyone was hard at work. The gold clearing-house had been overwhelmed, and everything was a mess. No one knew if they were bankrupt or not."
Edison in those days rather liked the modest coffee-shops, and mentions visiting one. "When on the New York No. 1 wire, that I worked in Boston, there was an operator named Jerry Borst at the other end. He was a first-class receiver and rapid sender. We made up a scheme to hold this wire, so he changed one letter of the alphabet and I soon got used to it; and finally we changed three letters. If any operator tried to receive from Borst, he couldn't do it, so Borst and I always worked together. Borst did less talking than any operator I ever knew. Never having seen him, I went while in New York to call upon him. I did all the talking. He would listen, stroke his beard, and say nothing. In the evening I went over to an all-night lunch-house in Printing House Square in a basement—Oliver's. Night editors, including Horace Greeley, and Henry Raymond, of the New York Times, took their midnight lunch there. When I went with Borst and another operator, they pointed out two or three men who were then celebrated in the newspaper world. The night was intensely hot and close. After getting our lunch and upon reaching the sidewalk, Borst opened his mouth, and said: 'That's a great place; a plate of cakes, a cup of coffee, and a Russian bath, for ten cents.' This was about fifty per cent. of his conversation for two days."
Edison used to enjoy the simple coffee shops back then and talks about visiting one. "When I was working on the New York No. 1 line from Boston, there was an operator named Jerry Borst at the other end. He was an excellent receiver and a fast sender. We came up with a system to keep the line secure, so he switched one letter of the alphabet, and I got used to it pretty quickly; eventually, we changed three letters. If any operator tried to receive from Borst, they wouldn’t be able to do it, so Borst and I always teamed up. Borst spoke less than any operator I ever met. Since I had never seen him, I decided to visit him while I was in New York. I did all the talking. He would listen, stroke his beard, and say nothing. In the evening, I went to an all-night diner in Printing House Square in a basement—Oliver's. Night editors, including Horace Greeley and Henry Raymond from the New York Times, had their midnight meals there. When I went with Borst and another operator, they pointed out a couple of guys who were well-known in the newspaper industry. The night was oppressively hot. After we got our food and stepped onto the sidewalk, Borst finally spoke up and said: 'That's a great place; a plate of cakes, a cup of coffee, and a Russian bath for ten cents.' That accounted for about fifty percent of his conversation over two days."
The work of Edison on the gold-indicator had thrown him into close relationship with Mr. Franklin L. Pope, the young telegraph engineer then associated with Doctor Laws, and afterward a distinguished expert and technical writer, who became President of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in 1886. Each recognized the special ability of the other, and barely a week after the famous events of Black Friday the announcement of their partnership appeared in the Telegrapher of October 1, 1869. This was the first "professional card," if it may be so described, ever issued in America by a firm of electrical engineers, and is here reproduced. It is probable that the advertisement, one of the largest in the Telegrapher, and appearing frequently, was not paid for at full rates, as the publisher, Mr. J. N. Ashley, became a partner in the firm, and not altogether a "sleeping one" when it came to a division of profits, which at times were considerable. In order to be nearer his new friend Edison boarded with Pope at Elizabeth, New Jersey, for some time, living "the strenuous life" in the performance of his duties. Associated with Pope and Ashley, he followed up his work on telegraph printers with marked success. "While with them I devised a printer to print gold quotations instead of indicating them. The lines were started, and the whole was sold out to the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company. My experimenting was all done in the small shop of a Doctor Bradley, located near the station of the Pennsylvania Railroad in Jersey City. Every night I left for Elizabeth on the 1 A.M. train, then walked half a mile to Mr. Pope's house and up at 6 A.M. for breakfast to catch the 7 A.M. train. This continued all winter, and many were the occasions when I was nearly frozen in the Elizabeth walk." This Doctor Bradley appears to have been the first in this country to make electrical measurements of precision with the galvanometer, but was an old-school experimenter who would work for years on an instrument without commercial value. He was also extremely irascible, and when on one occasion the connecting wire would not come out of one of the binding posts of a new and costly galvanometer, he jerked the instrument to the floor and then jumped on it. He must have been, however, a man of originality, as evidenced by his attempt to age whiskey by electricity, an attempt that has often since been made. "The hobby he had at the time I was there," says Edison, "was the aging of raw whiskey by passing strong electric currents through it. He had arranged twenty jars with platinum electrodes held in place by hard rubber. When all was ready, he filled the cells with whiskey, connected the battery, locked the door of the small room in which they were placed, and gave positive orders that no one should enter. He then disappeared for three days. On the second day we noticed a terrible smell in the shop, as if from some dead animal. The next day the doctor arrived and, noticing the smell, asked what was dead. We all thought something had got into his whiskey-room and died. He opened it and was nearly overcome. The hard rubber he used was, of course, full of sulphur, and this being attacked by the nascent hydrogen, had produced sulphuretted hydrogen gas in torrents, displacing all of the air in the room. Sulphuretted hydrogen is, as is well known, the gas given off by rotten eggs."
Edison’s work on the gold-indicator brought him into close contact with Mr. Franklin L. Pope, the young telegraph engineer who was then working with Doctor Laws and later became a distinguished expert and technical writer, serving as President of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in 1886. Both recognized each other's talents, and just a week after the famous events of Black Friday, their partnership was announced in the Telegrapher on October 1, 1869. This was the first "professional card," as it could be called, ever issued in America by a firm of electrical engineers, and it is reproduced here. It’s likely that the ad, one of the largest in the Telegrapher and appearing frequently, wasn’t paid for at full rates, since the publisher, Mr. J. N. Ashley, became a partner in the firm and was not entirely a "silent partner" when it came to profit-sharing, which could be significant at times. To be closer to his new friend, Edison stayed with Pope in Elizabeth, New Jersey, for a while, embracing a busy lifestyle while performing his duties. Working alongside Pope and Ashley, he continued his development of telegraph printers with notable success. "While I was with them, I designed a printer that would print gold quotations instead of just indicating them. The lines were launched, and the whole thing was sold to the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company. I did all my experimenting in a small shop owned by Doctor Bradley, located near the Pennsylvania Railroad station in Jersey City. Every night, I took the 1 A.M. train to Elizabeth, then walked half a mile to Mr. Pope's house, getting up at 6 A.M. for breakfast so I could catch the 7 A.M. train. This continued all winter, and there were many times I nearly froze on the walk to Elizabeth." Doctor Bradley seems to be the first person in this country to perform precise electrical measurements with a galvanometer, but he was an old-school experimenter who would spend years working on instruments that held no commercial value. He also had a very short temper, and on one occasion when a connecting wire wouldn’t come out of a binding post on a new, expensive galvanometer, he threw the instrument to the floor and then jumped on it. However, he was undoubtedly an original thinker, as shown by his attempt to age whiskey using electricity, a method that has been tried many times since. "At that time, his hobby was aging raw whiskey by passing strong electric currents through it. He set up twenty jars with platinum electrodes supported by hard rubber. Once everything was ready, he filled the jars with whiskey, connected the battery, locked the door of the small room they were in, and ordered that no one should enter. He then disappeared for three days. On the second day, we noticed a terrible smell in the shop, like something dead. When the doctor returned the next day, he asked what was dead, having noticed the smell. We all thought something had gotten into his whiskey room and died. He opened the door and was nearly overwhelmed by the odor. The hard rubber he used was filled with sulfur, and this was reacting with the nascent hydrogen, massively producing hydrogen sulfide gas that displaced all the air in the room. Hydrogen sulfide is well known for being the gas released by rotten eggs."
Another glimpse of this period of development is afforded by an interesting article on the stock-reporting telegraph in the Electrical World of March 4, 1899, by Mr. Ralph W. Pope, the well-known Secretary of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, who had as a youth an active and intimate connection with that branch of electrical industry. In the course of his article he mentions the curious fact that Doctor Laws at first, in receiving quotations from the Exchanges, was so distrustful of the Morse system that he installed long lines of speaking-tube as a more satisfactory and safe device than a telegraph wire. As to the relations of that time Mr. Pope remarks: "The rivalry between the two concerns resulted in consolidation, Doctor Laws's enterprise being absorbed by the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, while the Laws stock printer was relegated to the scrap-heap and the museum. Competition in the field did not, however, cease. Messrs. Pope and Edison invented a one-wire printer, and started a system of 'gold printers' devoted to the recording of gold quotations and sterling exchange only. It was intended more especially for importers and exchange brokers, and was furnished at a lower price than the indicator service.... The building and equipment of private telegraph lines was also entered upon. This business was also subsequently absorbed by the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, which was probably at this time at the height of its prosperity. The financial organization of the company was peculiar and worthy of attention. Each subscriber for a machine paid in $100 for the privilege of securing an instrument. For the service he paid $25 weekly. In case he retired or failed, he could transfer his 'right,' and employees were constantly on the alert for purchasable rights, which could be disposed of at a profit. It was occasionally worth the profit to convince a man that he did not actually own the machine which had been placed in his office.... The Western Union Telegraph Company secured a majority of its stock, and Gen. Marshall Lefferts was elected president. A private-line department was established, and the business taken over from Pope, Edison, and Ashley was rapidly enlarged."
Another look at this period of development comes from an interesting article on the stock-reporting telegraph in the Electrical World on March 4, 1899, by Mr. Ralph W. Pope, who was the well-known Secretary of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. As a young man, he had a close connection with this branch of the electrical industry. In his article, he notes the interesting fact that Doctor Laws was initially so skeptical of the Morse system for receiving quotes from the Exchanges that he set up long lines of speaking-tube as a more reliable and secure option than a telegraph wire. Regarding the relationships of that time, Mr. Pope comments: "The rivalry between the two companies led to a merger, with Doctor Laws's venture being absorbed by the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, while the Laws stock printer was thrown away and ended up in a museum. However, competition in the field didn't stop. Mr. Pope and Edison invented a one-wire printer and launched a system of 'gold printers' specifically for recording gold quotes and sterling exchange only. It was mainly designed for importers and exchange brokers and was offered at a lower price than the indicator service.... They also started building and equipping private telegraph lines. This business was later absorbed by the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, which was probably at the peak of its prosperity at that time. The company's financial structure was unique and noteworthy. Each subscriber for a machine paid $100 for the right to secure an instrument, and for the service, he paid $25 weekly. If he decided to leave or faced financial trouble, he could transfer his 'right,' and employees were always on the lookout for rights that could be bought at a profit. Sometimes, it was worth the profit to persuade a person that they didn't actually own the machine placed in their office.... The Western Union Telegraph Company acquired a majority of its stock, and General Marshall Lefferts was elected president. A private-line department was created, and the business taken over from Pope, Edison, and Ashley quickly expanded."
At this juncture General Lefferts, as President of the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, requested Edison to go to work on improving the stock ticker, furnishing the money; and the well-known "Universal" ticker, in wide-spread use in its day, was one result. Mr. Edison gives a graphic picture of the startling effect on his fortunes: "I made a great many inventions; one was the special ticker used for many years outside of New York in the large cities. This was made exceedingly simple, as they did not have the experts we had in New York to handle anything complicated. The same ticker was used on the London Stock Exchange. After I had made a great number of inventions and obtained patents, the General seemed anxious that the matter should be closed up. One day I exhibited and worked a successful device whereby if a ticker should get out of unison in a broker's office and commence to print wild figures, it could be brought to unison from the central station, which saved the labor of many men and much trouble to the broker. He called me into his office, and said: 'Now, young man, I want to close up the matter of your inventions. How much do you think you should receive?' I had made up my mind that, taking into consideration the time and killing pace I was working at, I should be entitled to $5000, but could get along with $3000. When the psychological moment arrived, I hadn't the nerve to name such a large sum, so I said: 'Well, General, suppose you make me an offer.' Then he said: 'How would $40,000 strike you?' This caused me to come as near fainting as I ever got. I was afraid he would hear my heart beat. I managed to say that I thought it was fair. 'All right, I will have a contract drawn; come around in three days and sign it, and I will give you the money.' I arrived on time, but had been doing some considerable thinking on the subject. The sum seemed to be very large for the amount of work, for at that time I determined the value by the time and trouble, and not by what the invention was worth to others. I thought there was something unreal about it. However, the contract was handed to me. I signed without reading it." Edison was then handed the first check he had ever received, one for $40,000 drawn on the Bank of New York, at the corner of William and Wall Streets. On going to the bank and passing in the check at the wicket of the paying teller, some brief remarks were made to him, which in his deafness he did not understand. The check was handed back to him, and Edison, fancying for a moment that in some way he had been cheated, went outside "to the large steps to let the cold sweat evaporate." He then went back to the General, who, with his secretary, had a good laugh over the matter, told him the check must be endorsed, and sent with him a young man to identify him. The ceremony of identification performed with the paying teller, who was quite merry over the incident, Edison was given the amount in bundles of small bills "until there certainly seemed to be one cubic foot." Unaware that he was the victim of a practical joke, Edison proceeded gravely to stow away the money in his overcoat pockets and all his other pockets. He then went to Newark and sat up all night with the money for fear it might be stolen. Once more he sought help next morning, when the General laughed heartily, and, telling the clerk that the joke must not be carried any further, enabled him to deposit the currency in the bank and open an account.
At this point, General Lefferts, president of the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, asked Edison to start working on improving the stock ticker and provided the funding for it. One result was the famous "Universal" ticker, widely used in its time. Mr. Edison vividly describes how it impacted his fortunes: "I made a lot of inventions; one was the special ticker that was used for many years outside of New York in major cities. It was made very simple because they didn't have the experts we had in New York to handle anything complicated. The same ticker was also used on the London Stock Exchange. After I had created a number of inventions and gotten patents, the General seemed eager to wrap things up. One day, I demonstrated a successful device that allowed a ticker in a broker's office that got out of sync and started printing random numbers to be restored from the central station, saving many workers' efforts and a lot of hassle for the broker. He called me into his office and said, 'Now, young man, I want to finalize the matter of your inventions. How much do you think you should get?' I had decided that, considering the time and the intense pace I was working at, I deserved $5000, but would be okay with $3000. When the moment came, I didn't have the courage to ask for such a big amount, so I said, 'Well, General, why don't you make me an offer?' Then he said, 'How about $40,000?' I nearly fainted. I was worried he could hear my heart racing. I managed to say that I thought it was fair. 'All right, I’ll have a contract drawn up; come by in three days to sign it, and I’ll give you the money.’ I showed up on time but had done a lot of thinking about it in the meantime. The amount seemed very large for the work I did; at that time, I determined value based on the time and effort, not on what the invention meant to others. I felt something wasn’t quite right about it. However, the contract was given to me, and I signed it without reading it." Edison then received the first check he had ever gotten, one for $40,000 from the Bank of New York at the corner of William and Wall Streets. When he took the check to the bank and handed it to the paying teller, a few brief comments were made that he didn’t catch due to his deafness. The check was returned to him, and Edison briefly thought he might have been scammed, so he went outside "to the large steps to let the cold sweat evaporate." Then he returned to the General, who, along with his secretary, had a good laugh about it. He told Edison the check needed to be endorsed and sent a young man with him to confirm his identity. After they completed the identification ritual with the paying teller, who was quite amused by the incident, Edison received the amount in stacks of small bills "until it seemed like there was at least one cubic foot." Unaware he was the victim of a practical joke, Edison seriously began stuffing the money into all his overcoat pockets and other pockets. He then went to Newark and stayed up all night with the money worried it might be stolen. The next morning, he sought help again, and the General laughed heartily, telling the clerk not to take the joke any further, allowing Edison to deposit the cash in the bank and open an account.
Thus in an inconceivably brief time had Edison passed from poverty to independence; made a deep impression as to his originality and ability on important people, and brought out valuable inventions; lifting himself at one bound out of the ruck of mediocrity, and away from the deadening drudgery of the key. Best of all he was enterprising, one of the leaders and pioneers for whom the world is always looking; and, to use his own criticism of himself, he had "too sanguine a temperament to keep money in solitary confinement." With quiet self-possession he seized his opportunity, began to buy machinery, rented a shop and got work for it. Moving quickly into a larger shop, Nos. 10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark, New Jersey, he secured large orders from General Lefferts to build stock tickers, and employed fifty men. As business increased he put on a night force, and was his own foreman on both shifts. Half an hour of sleep three or four times in the twenty-four hours was all he needed in those days, when one invention succeeded another with dazzling rapidity, and when he worked with the fierce, eruptive energy of a great volcano, throwing out new ideas incessantly with spectacular effect on the arts to which they related. It has always been a theory with Edison that we sleep altogether too much; but on the other hand he never, until long past fifty, knew or practiced the slightest moderation in work or in the use of strong coffee and black cigars. He has, moreover, while of tender and kindly disposition, never hesitated to use men up as freely as a Napoleon or Grant; seeing only the goal of a complete invention or perfected device, to attain which all else must become subsidiary. He gives a graphic picture of his first methods as a manufacturer: "Nearly all my men were on piece work, and I allowed them to make good wages, and never cut until the pay became absurdly high as they got more expert. I kept no books. I had two hooks. All the bills and accounts I owed I jabbed on one hook; and memoranda of all owed to myself I put on the other. When some of the bills fell due, and I couldn't deliver tickers to get a supply of money, I gave a note. When the notes were due, a messenger came around from the bank with the note and a protest pinned to it for $1.25. Then I would go to New York and get an advance, or pay the note if I had the money. This method of giving notes for my accounts and having all notes protested I kept up over two years, yet my credit was fine. Every store I traded with was always glad to furnish goods, perhaps in amazed admiration of my system of doing business, which was certainly new." After a while Edison got a bookkeeper, whose vagaries made him look back with regret on the earlier, primitive method. "The first three months I had him go over the books to find out how much we had made. He reported $3000. I gave a supper to some of my men to celebrate this, only to be told two days afterward that he had made a mistake, and that we had lost $500; and then a few days after that he came to me again and said he was all mixed up, and now found that we had made over $7000." Edison changed bookkeepers, but never thereafter counted anything real profit until he had paid all his debts and had the profits in the bank.
In an incredibly short time, Edison went from being poor to being independent; he made a strong impression on important people with his originality and skill, and he produced valuable inventions. He pulled himself out of mediocrity and the tedious grind of the past. Best of all, he was enterprising, one of those leaders and pioneers the world is always seeking. As he noted about himself, he had "too optimistic a nature to keep money locked away." With calm confidence, he seized his chance, bought machinery, rented a workshop, and started to put it to work. He quickly moved into a larger shop at Nos. 10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark, New Jersey, securing big orders from General Lefferts to build stock tickers and employing fifty men. As business grew, he added a night shift and served as his own foreman for both shifts. During those days, he only needed half an hour of sleep three or four times a day, working with explosive energy like a volcano, constantly generating new ideas that had a dramatic impact on the related fields. Edison always believed that we sleep too much; however, he never really practiced moderation in work or in his consumption of strong coffee and black cigars until well past fifty. Despite his gentle and kind nature, he used his workers as freely as Napoleon or Grant did, focused solely on achieving a complete invention or a perfected device, with everything else taking a backseat. He vividly described his early methods as a manufacturer: "Most of my workers were paid by the piece, and I let them earn good wages, only cutting pay when their earnings got absurdly high as they became more skilled. I didn’t keep any formal accounts. I had two hooks. I shoved all the bills and accounts I owed on one hook, and notes of what was owed to me on the other. When some bills came due, and I couldn't deliver tickers to get cash, I gave a note. When the notes were due, a messenger would come from the bank with the note and a protest pinned to it for $1.25. Then I'd go to New York to get an advance or pay the note if I had the cash. I followed this system of giving notes for my debts and having all notes protested for over two years, and my credit was solid. Every store I dealt with was always happy to supply goods, possibly in amazement at my unique way of doing business." After a while, Edison hired a bookkeeper, whose quirks made him long for his earlier, simpler method. "For the first three months, I had him go over the books to determine how much we’d made. He reported $3000. I celebrated with a supper for some of my workers, only to be told two days later that he made a mistake, and we had actually lost $500. Then a few days after that, he came back to me, all confused, and said we had actually made over $7000." Edison changed bookkeepers, but after that, he never counted any real profit until all his debts were settled and the profits were in the bank.
The factory work at this time related chiefly to stock tickers, principally the "Universal," of which at one time twelve hundred were in use. Edison's connection with this particular device was very close while it lasted. In a review of the ticker art, Mr. Callahan stated, with rather grudging praise, that "a ticker at the present time (1901) would be considered as impracticable and unsalable if it were not provided with a unison device," and he goes on to remark: "The first unison on stock tickers was one used on the Laws printer. [2] It was a crude and unsatisfactory piece of mechanism and necessitated doubling of the battery in order to bring it into action. It was short-lived. The Edison unison comprised a lever with a free end travelling in a spiral or worm on the type-wheel shaft until it met a pin at the end of the worm, thus obstructing the shaft and leaving the type-wheels at the zero-point until released by the printing lever. This device is too well known to require a further description. It is not applicable to any instrument using two independently moving type-wheels; but on nearly if not all other instruments will be found in use." The stock ticker has enjoyed the devotion of many brilliant inventors—G. M. Phelps, H. Van Hoevenbergh, A. A. Knudson, G. B. Scott, S. D. Field, John Burry—and remains in extensive use as an appliance for which no substitute or competitor has been found. In New York the two great stock exchanges have deemed it necessary to own and operate a stock-ticker service for the sole benefit of their members; and down to the present moment the process of improvement has gone on, impelled by the increasing volume of business to be reported. It is significant of Edison's work, now dimmed and overlaid by later advances, that at the very outset he recognized the vital importance of interchangeability in the construction of this delicate and sensitive apparatus. But the difficulties of these early days were almost insurmountable. Mr. R. W. Pope says of the "Universal" machines that they were simple and substantial and generally satisfactory, but adds: "These instruments were supposed to have been made with interchangeable parts; but as a matter of fact the instances in which these parts would fit were very few. The instruction-book prepared for the use of inspectors stated that 'The parts should not be tinkered nor bent, as they are accurately made and interchangeable.' The difficulties encountered in fitting them properly doubtless gave rise to a story that Mr. Edison had stated that there were three degrees of interchangeability. This was interpreted to mean: First, the parts will fit; second, they will almost fit; third, they do not fit, and can't be made to fit."
The factory work at this time was mainly focused on stock tickers, especially the "Universal," of which there were once twelve hundred in use. Edison's involvement with this device was very close while it lasted. In a review of ticker technology, Mr. Callahan remarked, somewhat reluctantly, that "a ticker today (1901) would be seen as impractical and unsellable if it didn’t have a unison device." He continued: "The first unison on stock tickers was used on the Laws printer. It was a basic and unsatisfactory mechanism that required doubling the battery to work. It didn’t last long. The Edison unison featured a lever with a free end moving in a spiral or worm on the type-wheel shaft until it hit a pin at the end of the worm, blocking the shaft and keeping the type-wheels at the zero-point until released by the printing lever. This device is well-known enough that it doesn’t need further description. It doesn’t apply to any instrument with two independently moving type-wheels, but it can be found in use on nearly all other instruments." The stock ticker has had the dedication of many brilliant inventors—G. M. Phelps, H. Van Hoevenbergh, A. A. Knudson, G. B. Scott, S. D. Field, John Burry—and remains widely used with no substitute or competitor in sight. In New York, the two major stock exchanges deemed it necessary to own and operate their own stock-ticker service for the benefit of their members; and up to today, improvements continue, driven by the growing volume of business to report. It's significant of Edison's work, now overshadowed by later advancements, that from the very beginning he recognized the crucial importance of interchangeability in the design of this delicate and sensitive equipment. But the challenges of those early days were almost impossible to overcome. Mr. R. W. Pope describes the "Universal" machines as simple and sturdy and generally satisfactory, but adds: "These instruments were supposed to have interchangeable parts; however, instances where these parts would actually fit were very few. The instruction manual for inspectors stated that 'The parts should not be tinkered with or bent, as they are made accurately and are interchangeable.' The difficulties in fitting them properly likely led to a story that Mr. Edison said there were three degrees of interchangeability. This was interpreted to mean: First, the parts will fit; second, they will almost fit; third, they don’t fit and can’t be made to fit."
[Footnote 2: This I invented as well.—T. A. E.]
[Footnote 2: I came up with this, too.—T. A. E.]
This early shop affords an illustration of the manner in which Edison has made a deep impression on the personnel of the electrical arts. At a single bench there worked three men since rich or prominent. One was Sigmund Bergmann, for a time partner with Edison in his lighting developments in the United States, and now head and principal owner of electrical works in Berlin employing ten thousand men. The next man adjacent was John Kruesi, afterward engineer of the great General Electric Works at Schenectady. A third was Schuckert, who left the bench to settle up his father's little estate at Nuremberg, stayed there and founded electrical factories, which became the third largest in Germany, their proprietor dying very wealthy. "I gave them a good training as to working hours and hustling," says their quondam master; and this is equally true as applied to many scores of others working in companies bearing the Edison name or organized under Edison patents. It is curiously significant in this connection that of the twenty-one presidents of the national society, the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, founded in 1884, eight have been intimately associated with Edison—namely, Norvin Green and F. L. Pope, as business colleagues of the days of which we now write; while Messrs. Frank J. Sprague, T. C. Martin, A. E. Kennelly, S. S. Wheeler, John W. Lieb, Jr., and Louis A. Ferguson have all been at one time or another in the Edison employ. The remark was once made that if a famous American teacher sat at one end of a log and a student at the other end, the elements of a successful university were present. It is equally true that in Edison and the many men who have graduated from his stern school of endeavor, America has had its foremost seat of electrical engineering.
This early workshop illustrates how deeply Edison has influenced the field of electrical engineering. At one bench, three notable men worked together. One was Sigmund Bergmann, who was once Edison's partner in lighting projects in the U.S. and is now the head and main owner of an electrical company in Berlin that employs ten thousand people. The next man was John Kruesi, who later became the engineer at the major General Electric Works in Schenectady. The third was Schuckert, who left the bench to handle his father's small estate in Nuremberg, stayed there, and established electrical factories that grew to be the third largest in Germany, leaving him quite wealthy. "I gave them a good training in work hours and hustling," says their former boss; and this applies to many others working for companies with the Edison name or those operating under Edison patents. It's interesting to note that of the twenty-one presidents of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, founded in 1884, eight have had close ties to Edison—namely, Norvin Green and F. L. Pope, who were his business associates back then; while Frank J. Sprague, T. C. Martin, A. E. Kennelly, S. S. Wheeler, John W. Lieb, Jr., and Louis A. Ferguson have all worked for Edison at some point. It has been said that if a famous American teacher sat at one end of a log and a student at the other, the elements of a successful university would be present. Similarly, in Edison and the many professionals who have emerged from his rigorous training, America has established a leading center for electrical engineering.
CHAPTER VIII
AUTOMATIC, DUPLEX, AND QUADRUPLEX TELEGRAPHY
WORK of various kinds poured in upon the young manufacturer, busy also with his own schemes and inventions, which soon began to follow so many distinct lines of inquiry that it ceases to be easy or necessary for the historian to treat them all in chronological sequence. Some notion of his ceaseless activity may be formed from the fact that he started no fewer than three shops in Newark during 1870-71, and while directing these was also engaged by the men who controlled the Automatic Telegraph Company of New York, which had a circuit to Washington, to help it out of its difficulties. "Soon after starting the large shop (10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark), I rented shop-room to the inventor of a new rifle. I think it was the Berdan. In any event, it was a rifle which was subsequently adopted by the British Army. The inventor employed a tool-maker who was the finest and best tool-maker I had ever seen. I noticed that he worked pretty near the whole of the twenty-four hours. This kind of application I was looking for. He was getting $21.50 per week, and was also paid for overtime. I asked him if he could run the shop. 'I don't know; try me!' he said. 'All right, I will give you $60 per week to run both shifts.' He went at it. His executive ability was greater than that of any other man I have yet seen. His memory was prodigious, conversation laconic, and movements rapid. He doubled the production inside three months, without materially increasing the pay-roll, by increasing the cutting speeds of tools, and by the use of various devices. When in need of rest he would lie down on a work-bench, sleep twenty or thirty minutes, and wake up fresh. As this was just what I could do, I naturally conceived a great pride in having such a man in charge of my work. But almost everything has trouble connected with it. He disappeared one day, and although I sent men everywhere that it was likely he could be found, he was not discovered. After two weeks he came into the factory in a terrible condition as to clothes and face. He sat down and, turning to me, said: 'Edison, it's no use, this is the third time; I can't stand prosperity. Put my salary back and give me a job.' I was very sorry to learn that it was whiskey that spoiled such a career. I gave him an inferior job and kept him for a long time."
WORK of various kinds came to the young manufacturer, who was also busy with his own projects and inventions. These began to branch out into so many different areas that it became difficult for anyone to keep track of them in chronological order. You can get a sense of his relentless energy from the fact that he opened three shops in Newark during 1870-71. While managing these, he was also hired by the men running the Automatic Telegraph Company of New York, which had a line to Washington, to help resolve their issues. "Soon after starting the large shop at 10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark, I rented space to the inventor of a new rifle. I think it was the Berdan. In any case, it was a rifle that was later adopted by the British Army. The inventor hired a toolmaker who was the best I had ever seen. I noticed he worked almost the entire twenty-four hours. This kind of dedication was exactly what I was looking for. He was earning $21.50 per week and also getting paid for overtime. I asked him if he could run the shop. 'I don't know; try me!' he replied. 'Okay, I’ll give you $60 a week to manage both shifts.' He took on the task. His leadership skills were better than anyone else I've ever seen. His memory was incredible, his conversation brief, and his movements quick. He doubled production in three months without significantly increasing the payroll, by speeding up cutting tools and using various gadgets. When he needed a break, he'd lie down on a workbench, sleep for twenty or thirty minutes, and wake up refreshed. Since I could do the same, I felt a great sense of pride in having such a capable person in charge of my operations. But as with everything, there were issues. One day he vanished, and despite sending people everywhere he might be found, he was nowhere to be seen. After two weeks, he returned to the factory looking disheveled and in terrible shape. He sat down and said to me, 'Edison, it's no use, this is the third time; I can't handle success. Lower my salary and give me a different job.' I was really disappointed to find out that it was whiskey that derailed such a promising career. I gave him a less important job and kept him around for a long time."
Edison had now entered definitely upon that career as an inventor which has left so deep an imprint on the records of the United States Patent Office, where from his first patent in 1869 up to the summer of 1910 no fewer than 1328 separate patents have been applied for in his name, averaging thirty-two every year, and one about every eleven days; with a substantially corresponding number issued. The height of this inventive activity was attained about 1882, in which year no fewer than 141 patents were applied for, and seventy-five granted to him, or nearly nine times as many as in 1876, when invention as a profession may be said to have been adopted by this prolific genius. It will be understood, of course, that even these figures do not represent the full measure of actual invention, as in every process and at every step there were many discoveries that were not brought to patent registration, but remained "trade secrets." And furthermore, that in practically every case the actual patented invention followed from one to a dozen or more gradually developing forms of the same idea.
Edison had now fully embarked on his career as an inventor, which has made a significant mark on the records of the United States Patent Office. From his first patent in 1869 until the summer of 1910, he applied for 1,328 separate patents, averaging thirty-two each year, or about one every eleven days, with a roughly equal number issued. The peak of his inventive activity occurred around 1882, when he applied for 141 patents, and seventy-five were granted to him, which is nearly nine times the amount from 1876, when he may be regarded as having adopted invention as a profession. It's important to note that these figures do not fully capture the extent of actual invention, as many discoveries at each stage were not patented but remained "trade secrets." Additionally, in almost every case, the patented invention stemmed from one to a dozen gradually evolving versions of the same idea.
An Englishman named George Little had brought over a system of automatic telegraphy which worked well on a short line, but was a failure when put upon the longer circuits for which automatic methods are best adapted. The general principle involved in automatic or rapid telegraphs, except the photographic ones, is that of preparing the message in advance, for dispatch, by perforating narrow strips of paper with holes—work which can be done either by hand-punches or by typewriter apparatus. A certain group of perforations corresponds to a Morse group of dots and dashes for a letter of the alphabet. When the tape thus made ready is run rapidly through a transmitting machine, electrical contact occurs wherever there is a perforation, permitting the current from the battery to flow into the line and thus transmit signals correspondingly. At the distant end these signals are received sometimes on an ink-writing recorder as dots and dashes, or even as typewriting letters; but in many of the earlier systems, like that of Bain, the record at the higher rates of speed was effected by chemical means, a tell-tale stain being made on the travelling strip of paper by every spurt of incoming current. Solutions of potassium iodide were frequently used for this purpose, giving a sharp, blue record, but fading away too rapidly.
An Englishman named George Little introduced a system of automatic telegraphy that worked well on short lines but failed on longer circuits, which are better suited for automatic methods. The general principle behind automatic or rapid telegraphs, except for the photographic types, is preparing the message in advance for sending by punching holes in narrow strips of paper—something that can be done with hand-punches or typewriter equipment. A specific set of perforations corresponds to a Morse group of dots and dashes for a letter of the alphabet. When the prepared tape is fed quickly through a transmitting machine, electrical contact is made where there are perforations, allowing the battery current to flow into the line and thereby transmit corresponding signals. At the receiving end, these signals are sometimes recorded on an ink-writing device as dots and dashes or even as typewritten letters. However, in many earlier systems, like Bain’s, the record at higher speeds was done chemically, creating a tell-tale stain on the moving strip of paper with every burst of incoming current. Solutions of potassium iodide were often used for this purpose, producing a clear blue record that faded too quickly.
The Little system had perforating apparatus operated by electromagnets; its transmitting machine was driven by a small electromagnetic motor; and the record was made by electrochemical decomposition, the writing member being a minute platinum roller instead of the more familiar iron stylus. Moreover, a special type of wire had been put up for the single circuit of two hundred and eighty miles between New York and Washington. This is believed to have been the first "compound" wire made for telegraphic or other signalling purposes, the object being to secure greater lightness with textile strength and high conductivity. It had a steel core, with a copper ribbon wound spirally around it, and tinned to the core wire. But the results obtained were poor, and in their necessity the parties in interest turned to Edison.
The Little system had a perforating device powered by electromagnets; its transmitting machine was operated by a small electromagnetic motor; and the record was made through electrochemical decomposition, using a tiny platinum roller instead of the more common iron stylus. Additionally, a special type of wire had been installed for the single circuit of two hundred and eighty miles between New York and Washington. This is thought to be the first "compound" wire made for telegraphic or other signaling purposes, aimed at achieving greater lightness while maintaining textile strength and high conductivity. It featured a steel core, with a copper ribbon spirally wound around it, and was tinned to the core wire. However, the results were disappointing, leading the interested parties to turn to Edison.
Mr. E. H. Johnson tells of the conditions: "Gen. W. J. Palmer and some New York associates had taken up the Little automatic system and had expended quite a sum in its development, when, thinking they had reduced it to practice, they got Tom Scott, of the Pennsylvania Railroad to send his superintendent of telegraph over to look into and report upon it. Of course he turned it down. The syndicate was appalled at this report, and in this extremity General Palmer thought of the man who had impressed him as knowing it all by the telling of telegraphic tales as a means of whiling away lonesome hours on the plains of Colorado, where they were associated in railroad-building. So this man—it was I—was sent for to come to New York and assuage their grief if possible. My report was that the system was sound fundamentally, that it contained the germ of a good thing, but needed working out. Associated with General Palmer was one Col. Josiah C. Reiff, then Eastern bond agent for the Kansas Pacific Railroad. The Colonel was always resourceful, and didn't fail in this case. He knew of a young fellow who was doing some good work for Marshall Lefferts, and who it was said was a genius at invention, and a very fiend for work. His name was Edison, and he had a shop out at Newark, New Jersey. He came and was put in my care for the purpose of a mutual exchange of ideas and for a report by me as to his competency in the matter. This was my introduction to Edison. He confirmed my views of the automatic system. He saw its possibilities, as well as the chief obstacles to be overcome—viz., the sluggishness of the wire, together with the need of mechanical betterment of the apparatus; and he agreed to take the job on one condition—namely, that Johnson would stay and help, as 'he was a man with ideas.' Mr. Johnson was accordingly given three months' leave from Colorado railroad-building, and has never seen Colorado since."
Mr. E. H. Johnson describes the situation: "Gen. W. J. Palmer and some associates from New York had invested a lot in developing the Little automatic system, thinking they had figured out how to make it work. They asked Tom Scott from the Pennsylvania Railroad to send his telegraph superintendent to review it and provide feedback. Naturally, he rejected it. The syndicate was shocked by this report, and in this moment of crisis, General Palmer remembered a guy who had impressed him with his knowledge while they were building railroads in Colorado, telling stories about telegraphy to pass the lonely hours. So this guy—it was me—was called to New York to help ease their disappointment if I could. My assessment was that the system had solid foundations, showed signs of potential, but required further development. General Palmer was teamed up with Col. Josiah C. Reiff, who was then the Eastern bond agent for the Kansas Pacific Railroad. The Colonel was always resourceful, and he came through this time as well. He mentioned a young man who was doing great work for Marshall Lefferts and was known to be a brilliant inventor and a hard worker. His name was Edison, and he had a workshop in Newark, New Jersey. He came over and I was tasked with working together with him to exchange ideas and evaluate his competence. This was my introduction to Edison. He validated my thoughts on the automatic system. He recognized its potential as well as the key challenges that needed to be addressed—namely, the sluggishness of the wire and the need for improvements to the equipment; he agreed to take on the project on one condition—Johnson needed to stay and assist, as 'he was a man with ideas.' Mr. Johnson was therefore given a three-month leave from the Colorado railroad project, and he has not returned to Colorado since."
Applying himself to the difficulties with wonted energy, Edison devised new apparatus, and solved the problem to such an extent that he and his assistants succeeded in transmitting and recording one thousand words per minute between New York and Washington, and thirty-five hundred words per minute to Philadelphia. Ordinary manual transmission by key is not in excess of forty to fifty words a minute. Stated very briefly, Edison's principal contribution to the commercial development of the automatic was based on the observation that in a line of considerable length electrical impulses become enormously extended, or sluggish, due to a phenomenon known as self-induction, which with ordinary Morse work is in a measure corrected by condensers. But in the automatic the aim was to deal with impulses following each other from twenty-five to one hundred times as rapidly as in Morse lines, and to attempt to receive and record intelligibly such a lightning-like succession of signals would have seemed impossible. But Edison discovered that by utilizing a shunt around the receiving instrument, with a soft iron core, the self-induction would produce a momentary and instantaneous reversal of the current at the end of each impulse, and thereby give an absolutely sharp definition to each signal. This discovery did away entirely with sluggishness, and made it possible to secure high speeds over lines of comparatively great lengths. But Edison's work on the automatic did not stop with this basic suggestion, for he took up and perfected the mechanical construction of the instruments, as well as the perforators, and also suggested numerous electrosensitive chemicals for the receivers, so that the automatic telegraph, almost entirely by reason of his individual work, was placed on a plane of commercial practicability. The long line of patents secured by him in this art is an interesting exhibit of the development of a germ to a completed system, not, as is usually the case, by numerous inventors working over considerable periods of time, but by one man evolving the successive steps at a white heat of activity.
Throwing himself into the challenges with his usual energy, Edison created new equipment and tackled the issue to the point where he and his team managed to transmit and record one thousand words per minute between New York and Washington, and thirty-five hundred words per minute to Philadelphia. Manual transmission by key doesn’t usually exceed forty to fifty words a minute. To sum it up, Edison's main contribution to the commercial development of the automatic telegraph was based on his observation that in a long line, electrical impulses become significantly delayed or sluggish due to a phenomenon called self-induction, which is somewhat corrected with condensers in regular Morse code. However, in the automatic telegraph, the goal was to handle impulses coming in at twenty-five to one hundred times faster than in Morse lines, and trying to receive and record such a rapid succession of signals would have seemed impossible. But Edison found that by using a shunt around the receiving device with a soft iron core, self-induction would result in a momentary and instant reversal of the current at the end of each impulse, providing a clear definition for each signal. This discovery eliminated sluggishness entirely and allowed for high speeds over much longer lines. Edison's work on the automatic telegraph didn’t end with this key idea; he also improved the mechanical design of the instruments and the perforators, and suggested several electrosensitive chemicals for the receivers. Thanks to his individual efforts, the automatic telegraph became practically viable for commercial use. The series of patents he secured in this field is a fascinating showcase of development from an initial idea to a fully realized system, not through many inventors over a long period, but by one person advancing the successive steps with intense activity.
This system was put in commercial operation, but the company, now encouraged, was quite willing to allow Edison to work out his idea of an automatic that would print the message in bold Roman letters instead of in dots and dashes; with consequent gain in speed in delivery of the message after its receipt in the operating-room, it being obviously necessary in the case of any message received in Morse characters to copy it in script before delivery to the recipient. A large shop was rented in Newark, equipped with $25,000 worth of machinery, and Edison was given full charge. Here he built their original type of apparatus, as improved, and also pushed his experiments on the letter system so far that at a test, between New York and Philadelphia, three thousand words were sent in one minute and recorded in Roman type. Mr. D. N. Craig, one of the early organizers of the Associated Press, became interested in this company, whose president was Mr. George Harrington, formerly Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury.
This system was put into commercial use, and the company, now motivated, was eager to let Edison develop his idea of an automatic machine that would print messages in bold Roman letters instead of dots and dashes. This would speed up message delivery after receiving them in the operating room, as it was obviously necessary to transcribe any message received in Morse code into written form before passing it on to the recipient. A large shop was rented in Newark, equipped with $25,000 worth of machinery, and Edison was given full responsibility. Here, he built their original type of apparatus, which was improved, and also advanced his experiments on the letter system to the point that during a test between New York and Philadelphia, three thousand words were sent in one minute and recorded in Roman type. Mr. D. N. Craig, one of the early organizers of the Associated Press, became interested in this company, whose president was Mr. George Harrington, a former Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury.
Mr. Craig brought with him at this time—the early seventies—from Milwaukee a Mr. Sholes, who had a wooden model of a machine to which had been given the then new and unfamiliar name of "typewriter." Craig was interested in the machine, and put the model in Edison's hands to perfect. "This typewriter proved a difficult thing," says Edison, "to make commercial. The alignment of the letters was awful. One letter would be one-sixteenth of an inch above the others; and all the letters wanted to wander out of line. I worked on it till the machine gave fair results. [3] Some were made and used in the office of the Automatic company. Craig was very sanguine that some day all business letters would be written on a typewriter. He died before that took place; but it gradually made its way. The typewriter I got into commercial shape is now known as the Remington. About this time I got an idea I could devise an apparatus by which four messages could simultaneously be sent over a single wire without interfering with each other. I now had five shops, and with experimenting on this new scheme I was pretty busy; at least I did not have ennui."
Mr. Craig brought with him in the early seventies from Milwaukee a man named Mr. Sholes, who had a wooden model of a machine that was called a "typewriter." Craig was interested in the machine and handed the model to Edison to improve. "This typewriter was tough to make commercially viable," Edison said, "because the letter alignment was terrible. One letter would be one-sixteenth of an inch higher than the others, and all the letters kept going out of line. I worked on it until the machine delivered acceptable results. Some were made and used in the office of the Automatic Company. Craig was very optimistic that one day all business letters would be written on a typewriter. He passed away before that happened, but it eventually gained popularity. The typewriter I refined for commercial use is now known as the Remington. Around this time, I came up with the idea of creating a device that could send four messages at the same time over a single wire without them interfering with each other. I now had five shops, and while experimenting with this new concept, I was pretty busy; at least I didn’t feel bored."
[Footnote 3: See illustration on opposite page, showing reproduction of the work done with this machine.]
[Footnote 3: See the illustration on the opposite page, showing a reproduction of the work done with this machine.]
A very interesting picture of Mr. Edison at this time is furnished by Mr. Patrick B. Delany, a well-known inventor in the field of automatic and multiplex telegraphy, who at that time was a chief operator of the Franklin Telegraph Company at Philadelphia. His remark about Edison that "his ingenuity inspired confidence, and wavering financiers stiffened up when it became known that he was to develop the automatic" is a noteworthy evidence of the manner in which the young inventor had already gained a firm footing. He continues: "Edward H. Johnson was brought on from the Denver & Rio Grande Railway to assist in the practical introduction of automatic telegraphy on a commercial basis, and about this time, in 1872, I joined the enterprise. Fairly good results were obtained between New York and Washington, and Edison, indifferent to theoretical difficulties, set out to prove high speeds between New York and Charleston, South Carolina, the compound wire being hitched up to one of the Southern & Atlantic wires from Washington to Charleston for the purpose of experimentation. Johnson and I went to the Charleston end to carry out Edison's plans, which were rapidly unfolded by telegraph every night from a loft on lower Broadway, New York. We could only get the wire after all business was cleared, usually about midnight, and for months, in the quiet hours, that wire was subjected to more electrical acrobatics than any other wire ever experienced. When the experiments ended, Edison's system was put into regular commercial operation between New York and Washington; and did fine work. If the single wire had not broken about every other day, the venture would have been a financial success; but moisture got in between the copper ribbon and the steel core, setting up galvanic action which made short work of the steel. The demonstration was, however, sufficiently successful to impel Jay Gould to contract to pay about $4,000,000 in stock for the patents. The contract was never completed so far as the $4,000,000 were concerned, but Gould made good use of it in getting control of the Western Union."
A really interesting picture of Mr. Edison during this time is provided by Mr. Patrick B. Delany, a well-known inventor in automatic and multiplex telegraphy, who was then the chief operator at the Franklin Telegraph Company in Philadelphia. His comment about Edison—that "his creativity inspired confidence, and hesitant investors became more assured when they learned he would be developing the automatic"—is a notable indication of how the young inventor had already established a strong presence. He adds: "Edward H. Johnson was brought in from the Denver & Rio Grande Railway to help with the practical rollout of automatic telegraphy on a commercial scale, and around this time, in 1872, I joined the effort. We achieved fairly good results between New York and Washington, and Edison, disregarding theoretical challenges, aimed to prove high speeds between New York and Charleston, South Carolina, tying the compound wire to one of the Southern & Atlantic wires from Washington to Charleston for testing. Johnson and I went to the Charleston end to implement Edison’s plans, which were quickly communicated via telegraph every night from a loft on lower Broadway, New York. We could only access the wire after all business had wrapped up, usually around midnight, and for months, during those quiet hours, that wire endured more electrical experimentation than any other wire had ever gone through. When the experiments concluded, Edison's system was put into regular commercial use between New York and Washington; and it performed well. If the single wire hadn’t broken about every other day, the project would have been financially successful; but moisture infiltrated between the copper ribbon and the steel core, causing galvanic action that quickly damaged the steel. However, the demonstration was successful enough to persuade Jay Gould to agree to pay about $4,000,000 in stock for the patents. The contract was never finalized regarding the $4,000,000, but Gould made good use of it to gain control of Western Union."
One of the most important persons connected with the automatic enterprise was Mr. George Harrington, to whom we have above referred, and with whom Mr. Edison entered into close confidential relations, so that the inventions made were held jointly, under a partnership deed covering "any inventions or improvements that may be useful or desired in automatic telegraphy." Mr. Harrington was assured at the outset by Edison that while the Little perforator would give on the average only seven or eight words per minute, which was not enough for commercial purposes, he could devise one giving fifty or sixty words, and that while the Little solution for the receiving tape cost $15 to $17 per gallon, he could furnish a ferric solution costing only five or six cents per gallon. In every respect Edison "made good," and in a short time the system was a success, "Mr. Little having withdrawn his obsolete perforator, his ineffective resistance, his costly chemical solution, to give place to Edison's perforator, Edison's resistance and devices, and Edison's solution costing a few cents per gallon. But," continues Mr. Harrington, in a memorable affidavit, "the inventive efforts of Mr. Edison were not confined to automatic telegraphy, nor did they cease with the opening of that line to Washington." They all led up to the quadruplex.
One of the key people involved in the automatic enterprise was Mr. George Harrington, whom we mentioned earlier, and with whom Mr. Edison formed a close, confidential partnership. This meant that the inventions created were jointly owned under a partnership agreement covering "any inventions or improvements that may be useful or desired in automatic telegraphy." Mr. Harrington was assured from the beginning by Edison that while the Little perforator could only produce about seven or eight words per minute—too slow for commercial use—he could create one that would deliver fifty or sixty words. Additionally, while the Little solution for receiving tape cost $15 to $17 per gallon, Edison could provide a ferric solution for just five or six cents per gallon. Edison delivered on all his promises, and soon the system became successful, with "Mr. Little pulling out his outdated perforator, his inefficient resistance, and his expensive chemical solution, making way for Edison's perforator, Edison's resistance and devices, and Edison's solution costing just a few cents per gallon. But," Mr. Harrington continues in a significant affidavit, "Mr. Edison’s inventive efforts were not limited to automatic telegraphy, nor did they stop with the opening of that line to Washington." All of these efforts eventually led to the quadruplex.
Flattered by their success, Messrs. Harrington and Reiff, who owned with Edison the foreign patents for the new automatic system, entered into an arrangement with the British postal telegraph authorities for a trial of the system in England, involving its probable adoption if successful. Edison was sent to England to make the demonstration, in 1873, reporting there to Col. George E. Gouraud, who had been an associate in the United States Treasury with Mr. Harrington, and was now connected with the new enterprise. With one small satchel of clothes, three large boxes of instruments, and a bright fellow-telegrapher named Jack Wright, he took voyage on the Jumping Java, as she was humorously known, of the Cunard line. The voyage was rough and the little Java justified her reputation by jumping all over the ocean. "At the table," says Edison, "there were never more than ten or twelve people. I wondered at the time how it could pay to run an ocean steamer with so few people; but when we got into calm water and could see the green fields, I was astounded to see the number of people who appeared. There were certainly two or three hundred. I learned afterward that they were mostly going to the Vienna Exposition. Only two days could I get on deck, and on one of these a gentleman had a bad scalp wound from being thrown against the iron wall of a small smoking-room erected over a freight hatch."
Flattered by their success, Messrs. Harrington and Reiff, who shared foreign patents for the new automatic system with Edison, made a deal with the British postal telegraph authorities to trial the system in England, potentially leading to its adoption if it worked well. In 1873, Edison was sent to England to conduct the demonstration, reporting to Col. George E. Gouraud, who had previously worked with Mr. Harrington at the U.S. Treasury and was now part of this new venture. With just a small suitcase of clothes, three large boxes of equipment, and a bright telegrapher named Jack Wright, he set sail on the Jumping Java, as it was humorously called, from the Cunard line. The journey was rough, and the little Java lived up to its name by bouncing all over the ocean. "At the table," Edison said, "there were never more than ten or twelve people. I wondered at the time how it could be profitable to run an ocean steamer with so few passengers; but when we reached calmer waters and saw the green fields, I was amazed to see how many people there were. There were definitely two or three hundred. I later found out that most were headed to the Vienna Exposition. I could only get on deck for two days, and on one of those, a gentleman had a severe scalp injury from being thrown against the iron wall of a small smoking room set up over a freight hatch."
Arrived in London, Edison set up his apparatus at the Telegraph Street headquarters, and sent his companion to Liverpool with the instruments for that end. The condition of the test was that he was to send from Liverpool and receive in London, and to record at the rate of one thousand words per minute, five hundred words to be sent every half hour for six hours. Edison was given a wire and batteries to operate with, but a preliminary test soon showed that he was going to fail. Both wire and batteries were poor, and one of the men detailed by the authorities to watch the test remarked quietly, in a friendly way: "You are not going to have much show. They are going to give you an old Bridgewater Canal wire that is so poor we don't work it, and a lot of 'sand batteries' at Liverpool." [4] The situation was rather depressing to the young American thus encountering, for the first time, the stolid conservatism and opposition to change that characterizes so much of official life and methods in Europe. "I thanked him," says Edison, "and hoped to reciprocate somehow. I knew I was in a hole. I had been staying at a little hotel in Covent Garden called the Hummums! and got nothing but roast beef and flounders, and my imagination was getting into a coma. What I needed was pastry. That night I found a French pastry shop in High Holborn Street and filled up. My imagination got all right. Early in the morning I saw Gouraud, stated my case, and asked if he would stand for the purchase of a powerful battery to send to Liverpool. He said 'Yes.' I went immediately to Apps on the Strand and asked if he had a powerful battery. He said he hadn't; that all that he had was Tyndall's Royal Institution battery, which he supposed would not serve. I saw it—one hundred cells—and getting the price—one hundred guineas—hurried to Gouraud. He said 'Go ahead.' I telegraphed to the man in Liverpool. He came on, got the battery to Liverpool, set up and ready, just two hours before the test commenced. One of the principal things that made the system a success was that the line was put to earth at the sending end through a magnet, and the extra current from this, passed to the line, served to sharpen the recording waves. This new battery was strong enough to pass a powerful current through the magnet without materially diminishing the strength of the line current."
When Edison arrived in London, he set up his equipment at the Telegraph Street headquarters and sent his partner to Liverpool with the instruments needed. The test required him to send from Liverpool and receive in London, recording at a rate of one thousand words per minute, with five hundred words sent every half hour for six hours. Edison was provided with a wire and batteries, but a preliminary test quickly revealed he was facing failure. Both the wire and batteries were subpar, and one of the officials observing the test remarked casually, in a friendly manner, "You're not going to have much luck. They’re giving you an old Bridgewater Canal wire that’s so bad we don’t even use it, along with some 'sand batteries' in Liverpool." The situation was pretty discouraging for the young American, who was encountering the rigid conservatism and resistance to change typical of so much of official life in Europe for the first time. "I thanked him," Edison recalls, "and hoped to do something in return. I knew I was in a tough spot. I had been staying at a small hotel in Covent Garden called the Hummums and was getting nothing but roast beef and flounders, which left my imagination in a slump. What I really needed was some pastries. That night I found a French pastry shop on High Holborn Street and indulged. My imagination bounced back. Early the next morning, I met with Gouraud, explained my situation, and asked if he would help with the purchase of a powerful battery to send to Liverpool. He agreed. I rushed over to Apps on the Strand and asked if he had a strong battery. He said he didn’t; all he had was Tyndall’s Royal Institution battery, which he doubted would work. I checked it out—one hundred cells—and after confirming the price—one hundred guineas—I hurried back to Gouraud. He told me to proceed. I sent a telegram to the guy in Liverpool. He arrived, got the battery to Liverpool, and set it up just two hours before the test started. One key factor that made the system successful was that the line was grounded at the sending end through a magnet, which allowed the extra current from this to enhance the recording waves. This new battery was powerful enough to send a strong current through the magnet without significantly weakening the line current."
[Footnote 4: The sand battery is now obsolete. In this type, the cell containing the elements was filled with sand, which was kept moist with an electrolyte.]
[Footnote 4: The sand battery is now outdated. In this type, the cell containing the components was filled with sand, which was kept wet with an electrolyte.]
The test under these more favorable circumstances was a success. "The record was as perfect as copper plate, and not a single remark was made in the 'time lost' column." Edison was now asked if he thought he could get a greater speed through submarine cables with this system than with the regular methods, and replied that he would like a chance to try it. For this purpose, twenty-two hundred miles of Brazilian cable then stored under water in tanks at the Greenwich works of the Telegraph Construction & Maintenance Company, near London, was placed at his disposal from 8 P.M. until 6 A.M. "This just suited me, as I preferred night-work. I got my apparatus down and set up, and then to get a preliminary idea of what the distortion of the signal would be, I sent a single dot, which should have been recorded upon my automatic paper by a mark about one-thirty-second of an inch long. Instead of that it was twenty-seven feet long! If I ever had any conceit, it vanished from my boots up. I worked on this cable more than two weeks, and the best I could do was two words per minute, which was only one-seventh of what the guaranteed speed of the cable should be when laid. What I did not know at the time was that a coiled cable, owing to induction, was infinitely worse than when laid out straight, and that my speed was as good as, if not better than, with the regular system; but no one told me this." While he was engaged on these tests Colonel Gouraud came down one night to visit him at the lonely works, spent a vigil with him, and toward morning wanted coffee. There was only one little inn near by, frequented by longshoremen and employees from the soap-works and cement-factories—a rough lot—and there at daybreak they went as soon as the other customers had left for work. "The place had a bar and six bare tables, and was simply infested with roaches. The only things that I ever could get were coffee made from burnt bread, with brown molasses-cake. I ordered these for Gouraud. The taste of the coffee, the insects, etc., were too much. He fainted. I gave him a big dose of gin, and this revived him. He went back to the works and waited until six when the day men came, and telegraphed for a carriage. He lost all interest in the experiments after that, and I was ordered back to America." Edison states, however, that the automatic was finally adopted in England and used for many years; indeed, is still in use there. But they took whatever was needed from his system, and he "has never had a cent from them."
The test under these better conditions was a success. "The results were flawless, and not a single remark was made in the 'time lost' column." Edison was then asked if he believed he could achieve a higher speed through submarine cables with this system compared to traditional methods, and he said he would like a chance to try. For this, twenty-two hundred miles of Brazilian cable, stored underwater in tanks at the Greenwich works of the Telegraph Construction & Maintenance Company near London, was made available to him from 8 PM to 6 AM. "This was perfect for me since I preferred working at night. I set up my equipment, and to get a preliminary idea of how distorted the signal would be, I sent a single dot, which should have been recorded on my automatic paper as a mark about one-thirty-second of an inch long. Instead, it measured twenty-seven feet long! Any arrogance I had completely disappeared. I worked on this cable for more than two weeks, and the best I could manage was two words per minute, which was only one-seventh of the speed the cable was supposed to achieve when laid properly. What I didn’t know at the time was that a coiled cable, due to induction, was much worse than if it were laid out straight, and my speed was as good as, if not better than, with the traditional system; but no one informed me of this." While he was working on these tests, Colonel Gouraud came down one night to visit him at the isolated works, spent the night with him, and wanted coffee in the morning. There was only one small inn nearby, frequented by longshoremen and workers from the soap and cement factories—a rough crowd—and they went there at daybreak as soon as the other customers had left for work. "The place had a bar and six bare tables and was crawling with roaches. The only thing I could get was coffee made from burnt bread, along with brown molasses cake. I ordered these for Gouraud. The taste of the coffee, along with the insects, was overwhelming. He fainted. I gave him a big shot of gin, and that brought him back. He went back to the works and waited until six when the daytime crew arrived and telegraphed for a carriage. He lost all interest in the experiments after that, and I was ordered back to America." Edison notes, however, that the automatic system was eventually adopted in England and used for many years; in fact, it is still in use there. But they took whatever they needed from his system, and he "has never received a cent from them."
Arduous work was at once resumed at home on duplex and quadruplex telegraphy, just as though there had been no intermission or discouragement over dots twenty-seven feet long. A clue to his activity is furnished in the fact that in 1872 he had applied for thirty-eight patents in the class of telegraphy, and twenty-five in 1873; several of these being for duplex methods, on which he had experimented. The earlier apparatus had been built several years prior to this, as shown by a curious little item of news that appeared in the Telegrapher of January 30, 1869: "T. A. Edison has resigned his situation in the Western Union office, Boston, and will devote his time to bringing out his inventions." Oh, the supreme, splendid confidence of youth! Six months later, as we have seen, he had already made his mark, and the same journal, in October, 1869, could say: "Mr. Edison is a young man of the highest order of mechanical talent, combined with good scientific electrical knowledge and experience. He has already invented and patented a number of valuable and useful inventions, among which may be mentioned the best instrument for double transmission yet brought out." Not bad for a novice of twenty-two. It is natural, therefore, after his intervening work on indicators, stock tickers, automatic telegraphs, and typewriters, to find him harking back to duplex telegraphy, if, indeed, he can be said to have dropped it in the interval. It has always been one of the characteristic features of Edison's method of inventing that work in several lines has gone forward at the same time. No one line of investigation has ever been enough to occupy his thoughts fully; or to express it otherwise, he has found rest in turning from one field of work to another, having absolutely no recreations or hobbies, and not needing them. It may also be said that, once entering it, Mr. Edison has never abandoned any field of work. He may change the line of attack; he may drop the subject for a time; but sooner or later the note-books or the Patent Office will bear testimony to the reminiscent outcropping of latent thought on the matter. His attention has shifted chronologically, and by process of evolution, from one problem to another, and some results are found to be final; but the interest of the man in the thing never dies out. No one sees more vividly than he the fact that in the interplay of the arts one industry shapes and helps another, and that no invention lives to itself alone.
Hard work resumed at home on duplex and quadruplex telegraphy, just as if there had been no break or discouragement over dots twenty-seven feet long. A clue to his dedication is evident in the fact that in 1872 he applied for thirty-eight patents in telegraphy, and twenty-five in 1873; several of these were for duplex methods he had been experimenting with. The earlier devices had been created years earlier, as noted in a small piece of news that appeared in the Telegrapher on January 30, 1869: "T. A. Edison has resigned his position at the Western Union office in Boston and will focus his time on developing his inventions." Oh, the incredible confidence of youth! Six months later, as we have seen, he had already made a name for himself, and the same journal noted in October 1869: "Mr. Edison is a young man of exceptional mechanical talent, combined with good scientific electrical knowledge and experience. He has already invented and patented several valuable and useful inventions, including the best instrument for double transmission yet introduced." Not bad for a 22-year-old. It’s natural, then, after his work on indicators, stock tickers, automatic telegraphs, and typewriters, to see him returning to duplex telegraphy, if it can even be said he had set it aside in the meantime. One of the defining characteristics of Edison's inventing style is that he has always worked in multiple areas simultaneously. No single line of investigation has ever completely occupied his thoughts; put another way, he finds rest in switching from one area of work to another, having no hobbies or leisure activities, nor needing them. It can also be noted that once Mr. Edison commits to a field of work, he never fully abandons it. He may change his approach or pause on a subject for a while, but sooner or later, his notebooks or the Patent Office will reflect the resurfacing of his thoughts on the matter. His focus has shifted over time and evolved from one problem to another, with some results proving to be final; however, his interest in each topic never fades. No one understands more clearly than he does that in the interplay of the arts, one industry influences and supports another, and no invention exists in isolation.
The path to the quadruplex lay through work on the duplex, which, suggested first by Moses G. Farmer in 1852, had been elaborated by many ingenious inventors, notably in this country by Stearns, before Edison once again applied his mind to it. The different methods of such multiple transmission—namely, the simultaneous dispatch of the two communications in opposite directions over the same wire, or the dispatch of both at once in the same direction—gave plenty of play to ingenuity. Prescott's Elements of the Electric Telegraph, a standard work in its day, described "a method of simultaneous transmission invented by T. A. Edison, of New Jersey, in 1873," and says of it: "Its peculiarity consists in the fact that the signals are transmitted in one direction by reversing the polarity of a constant current, and in the opposite direction by increasing or decreasing the strength of the same current." Herein lay the germ of the Edison quadruplex. It is also noted that "In 1874 Edison invented a method of simultaneous transmission by induced currents, which has given very satisfactory results in experimental trials." Interest in the duplex as a field of invention dwindled, however, as the quadruplex loomed up, for while the one doubled the capacity of a circuit, the latter created three "phantom wires," and thus quadruplexed the working capacity of any line to which it was applied. As will have been gathered from the above, the principle embodied in the quadruplex is that of working over the line with two currents from each end that differ from each other in strength or nature, so that they will affect only instruments adapted to respond to just such currents and no others; and by so arranging the receiving apparatus as not to be affected by the currents transmitted from its own end of the line. Thus by combining instruments that respond only to variation in the strength of current from the distant station, with instruments that respond only to the change in the direction of current from the distant station, and by grouping a pair of these at each end of the line, the quadruplex is the result. Four sending and four receiving operators are kept busy at each end, or eight in all. Aside from other material advantages, it is estimated that at least from $15,000,000 to $20,000,000 has been saved by the Edison quadruplex merely in the cost of line construction in America.
The way to the quadruplex started with work on the duplex, which was first suggested by Moses G. Farmer in 1852 and later developed by many clever inventors, especially in the U.S. by Stearns, before Edison took another look at it. The various methods for multiple transmission—like sending two messages in opposite directions over the same wire or sending both at once in the same direction—allowed for a lot of creativity. Prescott's *Elements of the Electric Telegraph*, a key work of its time, described "a method of simultaneous transmission invented by T. A. Edison, of New Jersey, in 1873," noting that, "Its peculiarity lies in the fact that the signals are sent in one direction by reversing the polarity of a constant current, and in the opposite direction by increasing or decreasing the strength of that same current." This contained the seeds of the Edison quadruplex. It also mentions that "In 1874 Edison invented a method of simultaneous transmission by induced currents, which has provided very good results in experimental trials." However, interest in the duplex as a field of invention faded as the quadruplex emerged, because while the duplex doubled the circuit's capacity, the quadruplex created three "phantom wires," therefore quadrupling the working capacity of any line it was applied to. As can be understood from the details above, the principle behind the quadruplex is to operate over the line with two currents from each end that differ in strength or type, so they only affect instruments designed to respond to those specific currents and not others; and by arranging the receiving equipment so that it isn't influenced by the currents sent from its own end of the line. By combining instruments that only respond to changes in the strength of current from the distant station with instruments that only respond to changes in the direction of current from the same station, and grouping a pair of these at each end of the line, the quadruplex is formed. Four sending and four receiving operators are busy at each end, totaling eight. Aside from other material benefits, it's estimated that between $15,000,000 and $20,000,000 has been saved through the Edison quadruplex just in the cost of line construction in America.
The quadruplex has not as a rule the same working efficiency that four separate wires have. This is due to the fact that when one of the receiving operators is compelled to "break" the sending operator for any reason, the "break" causes the interruption of the work of eight operators, instead of two, as would be the case on a single wire. The working efficiency of the quadruplex, therefore, with the apparatus in good working condition, depends entirely upon the skill of the operators employed to operate it. But this does not reflect upon or diminish the ingenuity required for its invention. Speaking of the problem involved, Edison said some years later to Mr. Upton, his mathematical assistant, that "he always considered he was only working from one room to another. Thus he was not confused by the amount of wire and the thought of distance."
The quadruplex doesn't usually work as efficiently as four separate wires. This is because when one of the receiving operators has to "break" the sending operator for any reason, it interrupts the work of eight operators instead of just two, which would happen with a single wire. So, the efficiency of the quadruplex, as long as the equipment is functioning properly, entirely depends on the skill of the operators using it. However, this doesn't take away from the cleverness needed for its invention. Addressing the problem, Edison mentioned years later to Mr. Upton, his mathematical assistant, that "he always thought of it as working from one room to another. This way, he wasn’t distracted by the number of wires or the idea of distance."
The immense difficulties of reducing such a system to practice may be readily conceived, especially when it is remembered that the "line" itself, running across hundreds of miles of country, is subject to all manner of atmospheric conditions, and varies from moment to moment in its ability to carry current, and also when it is borne in mind that the quadruplex requires at each end of the line a so-called "artificial line," which must have the exact resistance of the working line and must be varied with the variations in resistance of the working line. At this juncture other schemes were fermenting in his brain; but the quadruplex engrossed him. "This problem was of most difficult and complicated kind, and I bent all my energies toward its solution. It required a peculiar effort of the mind, such as the imagining of eight different things moving simultaneously on a mental plane, without anything to demonstrate their efficiency." It is perhaps hardly to be wondered at that when notified he would have to pay 12 1/2 per cent. extra if his taxes in Newark were not at once paid, he actually forgot his own name when asked for it suddenly at the City Hall, lost his place in the line, and, the fatal hour striking, had to pay the surcharge after all!
The huge challenges of putting such a system into practice are easy to imagine, especially since the "line" itself stretches across hundreds of miles and is affected by all kinds of weather conditions. Its ability to carry current changes from moment to moment, and it’s important to remember that the quadruplex needs an "artificial line" at each end, which must match the resistance of the working line and be adjusted according to the working line’s resistance changes. At this point, other ideas were bubbling in his mind, but the quadruplex had his full attention. "This was a very difficult and complicated problem, and I focused all my energy on solving it. It required a unique mental effort, like visualizing eight different things moving at the same time on a mental level, with no way to show their effectiveness." It’s not surprising that when he was told he’d have to pay an extra 12.5% if he didn’t pay his Newark taxes immediately, he actually forgot his own name when asked for it at the City Hall, lost his place in line, and ended up having to pay the extra fee anyway!
So important an invention as the quadruplex could not long go begging, but there were many difficulties connected with its introduction, some of which are best described in Mr. Edison's own words: "Around 1873 the owners of the Automatic Telegraph Company commenced negotiations with Jay Gould for the purchase of the wires between New York and Washington, and the patents for the system, then in successful operation. Jay Gould at that time controlled the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company, and was competing with the Western Union and endeavoring to depress Western Union stock on the Exchange. About this time I invented the quadruplex. I wanted to interest the Western Union Telegraph Company in it, with a view of selling it, but was unsuccessful until I made an arrangement with the chief electrician of the company, so that he could be known as a joint inventor and receive a portion of the money. At that time I was very short of money, and needed it more than glory. This electrician appeared to want glory more than money, so it was an easy trade. I brought my apparatus over and was given a separate room with a marble-tiled floor, which, by-the-way, was a very hard kind of floor to sleep on, and started in putting on the finishing touches.
An invention as significant as the quadruplex couldn't stay ignored for long, but there were many challenges related to its introduction, some of which are best expressed in Mr. Edison's own words: "Around 1873, the owners of the Automatic Telegraph Company began talks with Jay Gould to buy the wires between New York and Washington, along with the patents for the system that was already operating successfully. At that time, Jay Gould controlled the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company and was competing with Western Union while trying to lower Western Union's stock price on the Exchange. Around this time, I invented the quadruplex. I wanted to get Western Union interested in it to sell it, but I couldn't succeed until I made an arrangement with the company’s chief electrician, allowing him to be recognized as a joint inventor and receive part of the profits. At that time, I was very low on funds and needed money more than recognition. This electrician seemed to want recognition more than money, so it was an easy deal. I brought my equipment over and was given a separate room with a marble-tiled floor, which, by the way, was a really uncomfortable surface to sleep on, and I started making the final adjustments."
"After two months of very hard work, I got a detail at regular times of eight operators, and we got it working nicely from one room to another over a wire which ran to Albany and back. Under certain conditions of weather, one side of the quadruplex would work very shakily, and I had not succeeded in ascertaining the cause of the trouble. On a certain day, when there was a board meeting of the company, I was to make an exhibition test. The day arrived. I had picked the best operators in New York, and they were familiar with the apparatus. I arranged that if a storm occurred, and the bad side got shaky, they should do the best they could and draw freely on their imaginations. They were sending old messages. About 1, o'clock everything went wrong, as there was a storm somewhere near Albany, and the bad side got shaky. Mr. Orton, the president, and Wm. H. Vanderbilt and the other directors came in. I had my heart trying to climb up around my oesophagus. I was paying a sheriff five dollars a day to withhold judgment which had been entered against me in a case which I had paid no attention to; and if the quadruplex had not worked before the president, I knew I was to have trouble and might lose my machinery. The New York Times came out next day with a full account. I was given $5000 as part payment for the invention, which made me easy, and I expected the whole thing would be closed up. But Mr. Orton went on an extended tour just about that time. I had paid for all the experiments on the quadruplex and exhausted the money, and I was again in straits. In the mean time I had introduced the apparatus on the lines of the company, where it was very successful.
"After two months of intense work, I finally set up a system with eight operators, and we got it running smoothly from one room to another over a wire that connected to Albany and back. Under certain weather conditions, one side of the quadruplex would work inconsistently, and I hadn't figured out what was causing the issue. One day, during a company board meeting, I was supposed to do a demonstration test. The day came. I had chosen the best operators in New York, and they were familiar with the equipment. I instructed them that if a storm hit and the faulty side became unreliable, they should do their best and be creative. They were sending old messages. Around 1 o'clock, everything went wrong because there was a storm near Albany, and the faulty side became unstable. Mr. Orton, the president, along with Wm. H. Vanderbilt and other directors entered the room. I felt like my heart was trying to climb up my throat. I was paying a sheriff five dollars a day to hold off judgment on a case I had neglected, and if the quadruplex didn’t work in front of the president, I knew I would get into trouble and might lose my equipment. The New York Times published a full account the next day. I received $5000 as part payment for the invention, which put me at ease, and I expected everything to be wrapped up. But Mr. Orton went on an extended tour around that time. I had funded all the experiments on the quadruplex and ran out of money, putting me in a tough spot again. In the meantime, I had introduced the device on the company’s lines, where it was very successful."
"At that time the general superintendent of the Western Union was Gen. T. T. Eckert (who had been Assistant Secretary of War with Stanton). Eckert was secretly negotiating with Gould to leave the Western Union and take charge of the Atlantic & Pacific—Gould's company. One day Eckert called me into his office and made inquiries about money matters. I told him Mr. Orton had gone off and left me without means, and I was in straits. He told me I would never get another cent, but that he knew a man who would buy it. I told him of my arrangement with the electrician, and said I could not sell it as a whole to anybody; but if I got enough for it, I would sell all my interest in any SHARE I might have. He seemed to think his party would agree to this. I had a set of quadruplex over in my shop, 10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark, and he arranged to bring him over next evening to see the apparatus. So the next morning Eckert came over with Jay Gould and introduced him to me. This was the first time I had ever seen him. I exhibited and explained the apparatus, and they departed. The next day Eckert sent for me, and I was taken up to Gould's house, which was near the Windsor Hotel, Fifth Avenue. In the basement he had an office. It was in the evening, and we went in by the servants' entrance, as Eckert probably feared that he was watched. Gould started in at once and asked me how much I wanted. I said: 'Make me an offer.' Then he said: 'I will give you $30,000.' I said: 'I will sell any interest I may have for that money,' which was something more than I thought I could get. The next morning I went with Gould to the office of his lawyers, Sherman & Sterling, and received a check for $30,000, with a remark by Gould that I had got the steamboat Plymouth Rock, as he had sold her for $30,000 and had just received the check. There was a big fight on between Gould's company and the Western Union, and this caused more litigation. The electrician, on account of the testimony involved, lost his glory. The judge never decided the case, but went crazy a few months afterward." It was obviously a characteristically shrewd move on the part of Mr. Gould to secure an interest in the quadruplex, as a factor in his campaign against the Western Union, and as a decisive step toward his control of that system, by the subsequent merger that included not only the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company, but the American Union Telegraph Company.
At that time, the general superintendent of Western Union was Gen. T. T. Eckert (who had been Assistant Secretary of War under Stanton). Eckert was secretly negotiating with Gould to leave Western Union and take charge of the Atlantic & Pacific—Gould's company. One day, Eckert called me into his office and asked about financial matters. I told him Mr. Orton had left me broke, and I was in a tough spot. He told me I would never get another cent but that he knew someone who would buy it. I told him about my agreement with the electrician and said I couldn't sell it in its entirety to anyone; however, if I was offered enough, I would sell any share I might have. He seemed to think his person would agree to this. I had a set of quadruplex equipment in my shop at 10 and 12 Ward Street, Newark, and he arranged to bring him over the next evening to check out the apparatus. So the following morning, Eckert came over with Jay Gould and introduced him to me. This was the first time I had ever met him. I demonstrated and explained the apparatus, and they left. The next day, Eckert called for me, and I was taken to Gould's house, which was near the Windsor Hotel on Fifth Avenue. In the basement, he had an office. It was evening, and we entered through the servants' entrance, as Eckert probably feared he was being watched. Gould got right to it and asked me how much I wanted. I said, "Make me an offer." He replied, "I will give you $30,000." I said, "I will sell any interest I may have for that amount," which was more than I thought I could get. The next morning, I went with Gould to his lawyers' office, Sherman & Sterling, and received a check for $30,000, with Gould mentioning that I had gotten the steamboat Plymouth Rock, as he had sold it for $30,000 and had just received the check. There was a major dispute between Gould's company and Western Union, leading to more litigation. The electrician, due to the testimony involved, lost his reputation. The judge never decided the case but went insane a few months later. It was clearly a smart move by Gould to secure an interest in the quadruplex as part of his strategy against Western Union, marking a critical step towards his control of that system, which later included the merger with not just the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company, but also the American Union Telegraph Company.
Nor was Mr. Gould less appreciative of the value of Edison's automatic system. Referring to matters that will be taken up later in the narrative, Edison says: "After this Gould wanted me to help install the automatic system in the Atlantic & Pacific company, of which General Eckert had been elected president, the company having bought the Automatic Telegraph Company. I did a lot of work for this company making automatic apparatus in my shop at Newark. About this time I invented a district messenger call-box system, and organized a company called the Domestic Telegraph Company, and started in to install the system in New York. I had great difficulty in getting subscribers, having tried several canvassers, who, one after the other, failed to get subscribers. When I was about to give it up, a test operator named Brown, who was on the Automatic Telegraph wire between New York and Washington, which passed through my Newark shop, asked permission to let him try and see if he couldn't get subscribers. I had very little faith in his ability to get any, but I thought I would give him a chance, as he felt certain of his ability to succeed. He started in, and the results were surprising. Within a month he had procured two hundred subscribers, and the company was a success. I have never quite understood why six men should fail absolutely, while the seventh man should succeed. Perhaps hypnotism would account for it. This company was sold out to the Atlantic & Pacific company." As far back as 1872, Edison had applied for a patent on district messenger signal boxes, but it was not issued until January, 1874, another patent being granted in September of the same year. In this field of telegraph application, as in others, Edison was a very early comer, his only predecessor being the fertile and ingenious Callahan, of stock-ticker fame. The first president of the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, Elisha W. Andrews, had resigned in 1870 in order to go to England to introduce the stock ticker in London. He lived in Englewood, New Jersey, and the very night he had packed his trunk the house was burglarized. Calling on his nearest friend the next morning for even a pair of suspenders, Mr. Andrews was met with regrets of inability, because the burglars had also been there. A third and fourth friend in the vicinity was appealed to with the same disheartening reply of a story of wholesale spoliation. Mr. Callahan began immediately to devise a system of protection for Englewood; but at that juncture a servant-girl who had been for many years with a family on the Heights in Brooklyn went mad suddenly and held an aged widow and her daughter as helpless prisoners for twenty-four hours without food or water. This incident led to an extension of the protective idea, and very soon a system was installed in Brooklyn with one hundred subscribers. Out of this grew in turn the district messenger system, for it was just as easy to call a messenger as to sound a fire-alarm or summon the police. To-day no large city in America is without a service of this character, but its function was sharply limited by the introduction of the telephone.
Mr. Gould also recognized the worth of Edison's automatic system. Touching on topics that will be discussed later, Edison states: "After this, Gould wanted me to help set up the automatic system in the Atlantic & Pacific company, where General Eckert had been appointed president, and which had acquired the Automatic Telegraph Company. I did a lot of work for this company creating automatic devices in my workshop in Newark. Around this time, I invented a district messenger call-box system, started a company called the Domestic Telegraph Company, and began installing the system in New York. I faced a lot of challenges in getting subscribers since several canvassers failed one after the other. Just when I was about to give up, a test operator named Brown, who worked on the Automatic Telegraph line between New York and Washington that ran through my Newark shop, asked if he could try to find subscribers. I didn't have much faith in his ability, but I decided to give him a chance, as he was confident he could succeed. He started working on it, and the results were surprising. Within a month, he had secured two hundred subscribers, and the company became a success. I'll never understand why six men failed completely, while the seventh succeeded. Maybe it was hypnotism. This company was eventually sold to the Atlantic & Pacific company." Back in 1872, Edison had applied for a patent for district messenger signal boxes, but it wasn't granted until January 1874, with another patent issued in September of that year. In this area of telegraph technology, as in others, Edison was an early pioneer, with only the innovative Callahan, known for the stock ticker, as his predecessor. The first president of the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, Elisha W. Andrews, had resigned in 1870 to go to England to introduce the stock ticker in London. He lived in Englewood, New Jersey, and on the very night he packed his trunk, his house was burglarized. When he visited his closest friend the next morning to borrow a pair of suspenders, he was met with apologies as the burglars had also hit his friend's place. The same disappointing story came from a third and fourth friend nearby. Mr. Callahan quickly set out to create a system of protection for Englewood; however, a servant girl from a family in Brooklyn suddenly went mad and held an elderly widow and her daughter captive for twenty-four hours without food or water. This incident sparked the idea of extending protective measures, and soon a system was set up in Brooklyn with one hundred subscribers. From this, the district messenger system developed; it was just as easy to call a messenger as it was to sound a fire alarm or summon the police. Nowadays, no major city in America lacks this kind of service, although its role was significantly limited by the introduction of the telephone.
Returning to the automatic telegraph it is interesting to note that so long as Edison was associated with it as a supervising providence it did splendid work, which renders the later neglect of automatic or "rapid telegraphy" the more remarkable. Reid's standard Telegraph in America bears astonishing testimony on this point in 1880, as follows: "The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company had twenty-two automatic stations. These included the chief cities on the seaboard, Buffalo, Chicago, and Omaha. The through business during nearly two years was largely transmitted in this way. Between New York and Boston two thousand words a minute have been sent. The perforated paper was prepared at the rate of twenty words per minute. Whatever its demerits this system enabled the Atlantic & Pacific company to handle a much larger business during 1875 and 1876 than it could otherwise have done with its limited number of wires in their then condition." Mr. Reid also notes as a very thorough test of the perfect practicability of the system, that it handled the President's message, December 3, 1876, of 12,600 words with complete success. This long message was filed at Washington at 1.05 and delivered in New York at 2.07. The first 9000 words were transmitted in forty-five minutes. The perforated strips were prepared in thirty minutes by ten persons, and duplicated by nine copyists. But to-day, nearly thirty-five years later, telegraphy in America is still practically on a basis of hand transmission!
Returning to the automatic telegraph, it's interesting to note that as long as Edison was involved as a supervising force, it performed exceptionally well, which makes the later neglect of automatic or "rapid telegraphy" even more surprising. Reid's standard, *Telegraph in America,* provides remarkable evidence of this in 1880, stating: "The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company had twenty-two automatic stations. These included the main cities along the coast, Buffalo, Chicago, and Omaha. The overall business for nearly two years was mainly transmitted in this way. Between New York and Boston, two thousand words a minute were sent. The perforated paper was prepared at the rate of twenty words per minute. Regardless of its flaws, this system allowed the Atlantic & Pacific company to manage a much larger volume of business during 1875 and 1876 than it could have with its limited number of wires in their current state." Mr. Reid also highlights a thorough test of the system's practical effectiveness, noting that it successfully handled the President's message on December 3, 1876, which was 12,600 words long. This long message was sent from Washington at 1:05 and delivered in New York at 2:07. The first 9,000 words were transmitted in forty-five minutes. The perforated strips were prepared in thirty minutes by ten people and duplicated by nine copyists. Yet today, nearly thirty-five years later, telegraphy in America is still primarily based on manual transmission!
Of this period and his association with Jay Gould, some very interesting glimpses are given by Edison. "While engaged in putting in the automatic system, I saw a great deal of Gould, and frequently went uptown to his office to give information. Gould had no sense of humor. I tried several times to get off what seemed to me a funny story, but he failed to see any humor in them. I was very fond of stories, and had a choice lot, always kept fresh, with which I could usually throw a man into convulsions. One afternoon Gould started in to explain the great future of the Union Pacific Railroad, which he then controlled. He got a map, and had an immense amount of statistics. He kept at it for over four hours, and got very enthusiastic. Why he should explain to me, a mere inventor, with no capital or standing, I couldn't make out. He had a peculiar eye, and I made up my mind that there was a strain of insanity somewhere. This idea was strengthened shortly afterward when the Western Union raised the monthly rental of the stock tickers. Gould had one in his house office, which he watched constantly. This he had removed, to his great inconvenience, because the price had been advanced a few dollars! He railed over it. This struck me as abnormal. I think Gould's success was due to abnormal development. He certainly had one trait that all men must have who want to succeed. He collected every kind of information and statistics about his schemes, and had all the data. His connection with men prominent in official life, of which I was aware, was surprising to me. His conscience seemed to be atrophied, but that may be due to the fact that he was contending with men who never had any to be atrophied. He worked incessantly until 12 or 1 o'clock at night. He took no pride in building up an enterprise. He was after money, and money only. Whether the company was a success or a failure mattered not to him. After he had hammered the Western Union through his opposition company and had tired out Mr. Vanderbilt, the latter retired from control, and Gould went in and consolidated his company and controlled the Western Union. He then repudiated the contract with the Automatic Telegraph people, and they never received a cent for their wires or patents, and I lost three years of very hard labor. But I never had any grudge against him, because he was so able in his line, and as long as my part was successful the money with me was a secondary consideration. When Gould got the Western Union I knew no further progress in telegraphy was possible, and I went into other lines." The truth is that General Eckert was a conservative—even a reactionary—and being prejudiced like many other American telegraph managers against "machine telegraphy," threw out all such improvements.
During this time and his connection with Jay Gould, Edison shared some really interesting insights. "While I was working on the automatic system, I spent a lot of time with Gould and often went to his office downtown to share updates. Gould had no sense of humor. I tried several times to tell what I thought were funny stories, but he just didn’t get them. I loved stories and had a great collection that usually made people laugh. One afternoon, Gould started to explain the bright future of the Union Pacific Railroad, which he was running at the time. He brought out a map and had a ton of statistics. He went on for over four hours, getting really enthusiastic. I couldn't understand why he was explaining all this to me—a simple inventor with no money or status. He had a weird way about him, and I thought there might be a hint of insanity there. My suspicion grew stronger when Western Union raised the monthly fee for stock tickers. Gould had one in his home office, which he watched all the time. He had it removed, causing him a lot of trouble, just because the price went up a few dollars! He complained about it a lot. That seemed really strange to me. I think Gould’s success came from some unusual traits. He definitely had one quality that anyone looking to succeed needs: he gathered every kind of information and data about his plans. I was surprised by his connections with several high-profile people, which I was aware of. His conscience seemed practically nonexistent, but maybe that was because he was dealing with people who didn’t have one either. He worked non-stop until midnight or 1 a.m. He didn’t take pride in building a business; he was solely interested in money. Whether a company was successful or not didn’t matter to him. After he pushed through the Western Union against his rival and exhausted Mr. Vanderbilt, the latter stepped back from control, and Gould took over, consolidating his company with Western Union. He then canceled the contract with the Automatic Telegraph people, and they never got a penny for their wires or patents, leaving me with three years of hard work down the drain. But I never held a grudge against him because he was so competent in his field, and as long as my part was successful, money was just a secondary concern for me. Once Gould took control of Western Union, I realized that no further progress in telegraphy was possible, so I moved on to other areas." The truth is that General Eckert was conservative—even a reactionary—and, like many other American telegraph managers, he was biased against "machine telegraphy," dismissing all such advancements.
The course of electrical history has been variegated by some very remarkable litigation; but none was ever more extraordinary than that referred to here as arising from the transfer of the Automatic Telegraph Company to Mr. Jay Gould and the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company. The terms accepted by Colonel Reiff from Mr. Gould, on December 30, 1874, provided that the purchasing telegraph company should increase its capital to $15,000,000, of which the Automatic interests were to receive $4,000,000 for their patents, contracts, etc. The stock was then selling at about 25, and in the later consolidation with the Western Union "went in" at about 60; so that the real purchase price was not less than $1,000,000 in cash. There was a private arrangement in writing with Mr. Gould that he was to receive one-tenth of the "result" to the Automatic group, and a tenth of the further results secured at home and abroad. Mr. Gould personally bought up and gave money and bonds for one or two individual interests on the above basis, including that of Harrington, who in his representative capacity executed assignments to Mr. Gould. But payments were then stopped, and the other owners were left without any compensation, although all that belonged to them in the shape of property and patents was taken over bodily into Atlantic & Pacific hands, and never again left them. Attempts at settlement were made in their behalf, and dragged wearily, due apparently to the fact that the plans were blocked by General Eckert, who had in some manner taken offence at a transaction effected without his active participation in all the details. Edison, who became under the agreement the electrician of the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company, has testified to the unfriendly attitude assumed toward him by General Eckert, as president. In a graphic letter from Menlo Park to Mr. Gould, dated February 2, 1877, Edison makes a most vigorous and impassioned complaint of his treatment, "which, acting cumulatively, was a long, unbroken disappointment to me"; and he reminds Mr. Gould of promises made to him the day the transfer had been effected of Edison's interest in the quadruplex. The situation was galling to the busy, high-spirited young inventor, who, moreover, "had to live"; and it led to his resumption of work for the Western Union Telegraph Company, which was only too glad to get him back. Meantime, the saddened and perplexed Automatic group was left unpaid, and it was not until 1906, on a bill filed nearly thirty years before, that Judge Hazel, in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, found strongly in favor of the claimants and ordered an accounting. The court held that there had been a most wrongful appropriation of the patents, including alike those relating to the automatic, the duplex, and the quadruplex, all being included in the general arrangement under which Mr. Gould had held put his tempting bait of $4,000,000. In the end, however, the complainant had nothing to show for all his struggle, as the master who made the accounting set the damages at one dollar!
The history of electrical innovation has been marked by some incredibly notable legal battles, but none was more extraordinary than the one related to the transfer of the Automatic Telegraph Company to Mr. Jay Gould and the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company. The deal that Colonel Reiff accepted from Mr. Gould on December 30, 1874, stated that the buying telegraph company should increase its capital to $15,000,000, with the Automatic interests receiving $4,000,000 for their patents, contracts, and so on. At that time, the stock was selling for about 25, and during the subsequent merger with Western Union, it was valued at about 60; meaning the actual purchase price was no less than $1,000,000 in cash. There was a private written agreement with Mr. Gould stating he would receive one-tenth of the "results" attributed to the Automatic group as well as one-tenth of any additional results secured both domestically and internationally. Mr. Gould personally acquired and provided money and bonds for one or two individual interests based on this agreement, including Harrington's, who, in his official capacity, assigned them to Mr. Gould. However, payments were soon halted, leaving the other owners without any compensation, despite the fact that their properties and patents were completely taken over by Atlantic & Pacific and never returned. Attempts to settle on their behalf were made but dragged on, seemingly because General Eckert had some issue with a deal that happened without his active involvement in all its details. Edison, who became the electrician for the Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company under this agreement, testified about General Eckert's unfriendly attitude towards him as president. In a vivid letter from Menlo Park to Mr. Gould, dated February 2, 1877, Edison passionately complained about his treatment, describing it as "a long, unbroken disappointment." He reminded Mr. Gould of promises made to him on the day the transfer of his interest in the quadruplex was completed. This situation deeply frustrated the busy, spirited young inventor, who was struggling to make a living, and prompted him to resume work for the Western Union Telegraph Company, which was more than happy to have him back. Meanwhile, the disheartened and baffled Automatic group remained unpaid, and it wasn't until 1906, on a claim filed nearly thirty years earlier, that Judge Hazel, in the U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, ruled strongly in favor of the claimants and ordered an accounting. The court determined that there had been a serious wrongful appropriation of the patents, including those related to the automatic, duplex, and quadruplex systems, all of which were part of the general arrangement under which Mr. Gould had dangled the tempting $4,000,000. Ultimately, however, the complainant had nothing to show for all his efforts, as the accountant determined the damages to be just one dollar!
Aside from the great value of the quadruplex, saving millions of dollars, for a share in which Edison received $30,000, the automatic itself is described as of considerable utility by Sir William Thomson in his juror report at the Centennial Exposition of 1876, recommending it for award. This leading physicist of his age, afterward Lord Kelvin, was an adept in telegraphy, having made the ocean cable talk, and he saw in Edison's "American Automatic," as exhibited by the Atlantic & Pacific company, a most meritorious and useful system. With the aid of Mr. E. H. Johnson he made exhaustive tests, carrying away with him to Glasgow University the surprising records that he obtained. His official report closes thus: "The electromagnetic shunt with soft iron core, invented by Mr. Edison, utilizing Professor Henry's discovery of electromagnetic induction in a single circuit to produce a momentary reversal of the line current at the instant when the battery is thrown off and so cut off the chemical marks sharply at the proper instant, is the electrical secret of the great speed he has achieved. The main peculiarities of Mr. Edison's automatic telegraph shortly stated in conclusion are: (1) the perforator; (2) the contact-maker; (3) the electromagnetic shunt; and (4) the ferric cyanide of iron solution. It deserves award as a very important step in land telegraphy." The attitude thus disclosed toward Mr. Edison's work was never changed, except that admiration grew as fresh inventions were brought forward. To the day of his death Lord Kelvin remained on terms of warmest friendship with his American co-laborer, with whose genius he thus first became acquainted at Philadelphia in the environment of Franklin.
Aside from the immense value of the quadruplex, which saved millions and earned Edison $30,000 for his share, the automatic system was also noted for its significant utility by Sir William Thomson in his juror report at the 1876 Centennial Exposition, where he recommended it for an award. This leading physicist of his time, later known as Lord Kelvin, was skilled in telegraphy and had successfully made the ocean cable operational. He recognized Edison's "American Automatic," showcased by the Atlantic & Pacific company, as a highly commendable and useful system. With Mr. E. H. Johnson's assistance, he conducted thorough tests and took back impressive records to Glasgow University. His official report concluded: "The electromagnetic shunt with a soft iron core, invented by Mr. Edison, uses Professor Henry's discovery of electromagnetic induction in a single circuit to create a momentary reversal of the line current the moment the battery is turned off, sharply cutting off the chemical marks at the right time. This is the electrical secret behind the remarkable speed he has achieved. The main features of Mr. Edison's automatic telegraph can be summarized as follows: (1) the perforator; (2) the contact-maker; (3) the electromagnetic shunt; and (4) the ferric cyanide of iron solution. It deserves an award as a very significant advancement in land telegraphy." The appreciation for Mr. Edison's work only grew over time as new inventions emerged. Until his death, Lord Kelvin maintained a close friendship with his American collaborator, whose brilliance he first recognized in Philadelphia, surrounded by the legacy of Franklin.
It is difficult to give any complete idea of the activity maintained at the Newark shops during these anxious, harassed years, but the statement that at one time no fewer than forty-five different inventions were being worked upon, will furnish some notion of the incandescent activity of the inventor and his assistants. The hours were literally endless; and upon one occasion, when the order was in hand for a large quantity of stock tickers, Edison locked his men in until the job had been finished of making the machine perfect, and "all the bugs taken out," which meant sixty hours of unintermitted struggle with the difficulties. Nor were the problems and inventions all connected with telegraphy. On the contrary, Edison's mind welcomed almost any new suggestion as a relief from the regular work in hand. Thus: "Toward the latter part of 1875, in the Newark shop, I invented a device for multiplying copies of letters, which I sold to Mr. A. B. Dick, of Chicago, and in the years since it has been universally introduced throughout the world. It is called the 'Mimeograph.' I also invented devices for and introduced paraffin paper, now used universally for wrapping up candy, etc." The mimeograph employs a pointed stylus, used as in writing with a lead-pencil, which is moved over a kind of tough prepared paper placed on a finely grooved steel plate. The writing is thus traced by means of a series of minute perforations in the sheet, from which, as a stencil, hundreds of copies can be made. Such stencils can be prepared on typewriters. Edison elaborated this principle in two other forms—one pneumatic and one electric—the latter being in essence a reciprocating motor. Inside the barrel of the electric pen a little plunger, carrying the stylus, travels to and fro at a very high rate of speed, due to the attraction and repulsion of the solenoid coils of wire surrounding it; and as the hand of the writer guides it the pen thus makes its record in a series of very minute perforations in the paper. The current from a small battery suffices to energize the pen, and with the stencil thus made hundreds of copies of the document can be furnished. As a matter of fact, as many as three thousand copies have been made from a single mimeographic stencil of this character.
It's hard to fully capture the level of activity at the Newark shops during those stressful years, but the fact that at one point there were forty-five different inventions in progress gives some idea of the intense energy of the inventor and his team. The hours were literally endless; at one point, when he had a large order for stock tickers, Edison locked his workers in until they perfected the machine and resolved all the issues, which meant sixty hours of nonstop effort. The challenges and inventions weren’t all related to telegraphy, either. Instead, Edison's mind was open to almost any new idea as a break from the usual tasks. For example, "Toward the end of 1875, in the Newark shop, I invented a device for making multiple copies of letters, which I sold to Mr. A. B. Dick in Chicago, and it has since been widely adopted worldwide. It's called the 'Mimeograph.' I also invented devices for and introduced paraffin paper, which is now commonly used for wrapping candy, etc." The mimeograph uses a pointed stylus, similar to writing with a pencil, which moves across a tough prepared paper set on a finely grooved steel plate. The writing creates a series of tiny holes in the sheet, allowing hundreds of copies to be made from it like a stencil. Such stencils can be created on typewriters. Edison developed this concept in two additional forms—one pneumatic and one electric—the latter essentially being a reciprocating motor. Inside the electric pen, a small plunger with the stylus moves back and forth at a very high speed, thanks to the attraction and repulsion of the surrounding solenoid wire coils; as the user's hand guides it, the pen makes its mark in a series of tiny holes in the paper. The current from a small battery powers the pen, and with the stencil created, hundreds of copies of the document can be produced. In fact, as many as three thousand copies have been made from a single mimeographic stencil like this.
CHAPTER IX
THE TELEPHONE, MOTOGRAPH, AND MICROPHONE
A VERY great invention has its own dramatic history. Episodes full of human interest attend its development. The periods of weary struggle, the daring adventure along unknown paths, the clash of rival claimants, are closely similar to those which mark the revelation and subjugation of a new continent. At the close of the epoch of discovery it is seen that mankind as a whole has made one more great advance; but in the earlier stages one watched chiefly the confused vicissitudes of fortune of the individual pioneers. The great modern art of telephony has had thus in its beginnings, its evolution, and its present status as a universal medium of intercourse, all the elements of surprise, mystery, swift creation of wealth, tragic interludes, and colossal battle that can appeal to the imagination and hold public attention. And in this new electrical industry, in laying its essential foundations, Edison has again been one of the dominant figures.
A truly remarkable invention has its own dramatic story. There are many compelling human experiences involved in its development. The long periods of tireless effort, the bold adventures into the unknown, and the competition among rivals are very similar to the events that mark the discovery and conquest of a new continent. By the end of the discovery era, it's clear that humanity as a whole has made another significant leap forward; however, in the early stages, the focus is mainly on the turbulent fortunes of individual pioneers. The modern art of telephony has similarly had, from its beginnings to its evolution and current status as a global means of communication, all the elements of surprise, mystery, rapid wealth creation, tragic stories, and monumental struggles that capture the imagination and engage the public. In this new electrical industry, as it laid its essential groundwork, Edison has once again been one of the key figures.
As far back as 1837, the American, Page, discovered the curious fact that an iron bar, when magnetized and demagnetized at short intervals of time, emitted sounds due to the molecular disturbances in the mass. Philipp Reis, a simple professor in Germany, utilized this principle in the construction of apparatus for the transmission of sound; but in the grasp of the idea he was preceded by Charles Bourseul, a young French soldier in Algeria, who in 1854, under the title of "Electrical Telephony," in a Parisian illustrated paper, gave a brief and lucid description as follows:
As early as 1837, an American named Page discovered that a magnetized iron bar, when magnetized and demagnetized at short intervals, produced sounds because of the molecular disturbances within it. Philipp Reis, a simple professor in Germany, made use of this principle to create equipment for transmitting sound; however, Charles Bourseul, a young French soldier in Algeria, had previously grasped the idea. In 1854, he wrote an article titled "Electrical Telephony" in a Parisian illustrated magazine, in which he provided a clear and concise description as follows:
"We know that sounds are made by vibrations, and are made sensible to the ear by the same vibrations, which are reproduced by the intervening medium. But the intensity of the vibrations diminishes very rapidly with the distance; so that even with the aid of speaking-tubes and trumpets it is impossible to exceed somewhat narrow limits. Suppose a man speaks near a movable disk sufficiently flexible to lose none of the vibrations of the voice; that this disk alternately makes and breaks the connection with a battery; you may have at a distance another disk which will simultaneously execute the same vibrations.... Any one who is not deaf and dumb may use this mode of transmission, which would require no apparatus except an electric battery, two vibrating disks, and a wire."
"We know that sounds are created by vibrations and that these vibrations are transmitted to the ear through a medium. However, the strength of these vibrations quickly decreases as you move away from the source, so even with tools like speaking tubes and trumpets, there's a limit to how far they can carry sound. Imagine a person speaking close to a flexible disk that doesn't lose any vibrations from their voice; this disk could alternatively connect and disconnect with a battery. You could have another disk at a distance that replicates the same vibrations. Anyone who isn't deaf or mute can use this method of sound transmission, which only requires an electric battery, two vibrating disks, and a wire."
This would serve admirably for a portrayal of the Bell telephone, except that it mentions distinctly the use of the make-and-break method (i. e., where the circuit is necessarily opened and closed as in telegraphy, although, of course, at an enormously higher rate), which has never proved practical.
This would be great for showing the Bell telephone, but it specifically mentions the make-and-break method (i.e., where the circuit is opened and closed like in telegraphy, although, of course, at a much higher rate), which has never been practical.
So far as is known Bourseul was not practical enough to try his own suggestion, and never made a telephone. About 1860, Reis built several forms of electrical telephonic apparatus, all imitating in some degree the human ear, with its auditory tube, tympanum, etc., and examples of the apparatus were exhibited in public not only in Germany, but in England. There is a variety of testimony to the effect that not only musical sounds, but stray words and phrases, were actually transmitted with mediocre, casual success. It was impossible, however, to maintain the devices in adjustment for more than a few seconds, since the invention depended upon the make-and-break principle, the circuit being made and broken every time an impulse-creating sound went through it, causing the movement of the diaphragm on which the sound-waves impinged. Reis himself does not appear to have been sufficiently interested in the marvellous possibilities of the idea to follow it up—remarking to the man who bought his telephonic instruments and tools that he had shown the world the way. In reality it was not the way, although a monument erected to his memory at Frankfort styles him the inventor of the telephone. As one of the American judges said, in deciding an early litigation over the invention of the telephone, a hundred years of Reis would not have given the world the telephonic art for public use. Many others after Reis tried to devise practical make-and-break telephones, and all failed; although their success would have rendered them very valuable as a means of fighting the Bell patent. But the method was a good starting-point, even if it did not indicate the real path. If Reis had been willing to experiment with his apparatus so that it did not make-and-break, he would probably have been the true father of the telephone, besides giving it the name by which it is known. It was not necessary to slam the gate open and shut. All that was required was to keep the gate closed, and rattle the latch softly. Incidentally it may be noted that Edison in experimenting with the Reis transmitter recognized at once the defect caused by the make-and-break action, and sought to keep the gap closed by the use, first, of one drop of water, and later of several drops. But the water decomposed, and the incurable defect was still there.
As far as we know, Bourseul wasn't practical enough to try his own idea and never actually made a telephone. Around 1860, Reis created several types of electrical telephone devices, all resembling the human ear in some way, complete with its auditory tube and tympanum. These devices were publicly displayed not only in Germany but also in England. There are various accounts suggesting that both musical sounds and random words and phrases were transmitted with somewhat mediocre success. However, it was impossible to keep the devices properly adjusted for more than a few seconds because the invention relied on a make-and-break principle, where the circuit was completed and interrupted every time an impulse-creating sound passed through it, causing the diaphragm to move in response to sound waves. Reis himself didn't seem very interested in the amazing possibilities of his idea, telling the buyer of his telephonic instruments and tools that he had shown the world the way. In reality, it wasn't the right way, although a monument in Frankfort honors him as the inventor of the telephone. As one American judge remarked during an early legal dispute about the invention of the telephone, even a hundred years of Reis wouldn't have brought the telephonic technology to public use. Many others after Reis attempted to create practical make-and-break telephones, but all failed; their success could have been quite valuable in challenging the Bell patent. Nonetheless, the method was a decent starting point, even if it didn’t lead to the actual solution. If Reis had been open to experimenting with his apparatus so that it didn't rely on the make-and-break method, he might have truly been recognized as the father of the telephone, and named it as well. It wasn't necessary to slam the gate open and shut; all that was needed was to keep the gate closed and gently rattle the latch. Interestingly, Edison, while experimenting with the Reis transmitter, immediately identified the flaw caused by the make-and-break action and tried to keep the gap closed by first using one drop of water, and later several drops. However, the water decomposed, and the persistent defect remained.
The Reis telephone was brought to America by Dr. P. H. Van der Weyde, a well-known physicist in his day, and was exhibited by him before a technical audience at Cooper Union, New York, in 1868, and described shortly after in the technical press. The apparatus attracted attention, and a set was secured by Prof. Joseph Henry for the Smithsonian Institution. There the famous philosopher showed and explained it to Alexander Graham Bell, when that young and persevering Scotch genius went to get help and data as to harmonic telegraphy, upon which he was working, and as to transmitting vocal sounds. Bell took up immediately and energetically the idea that his two predecessors had dropped—and reached the goal. In 1875 Bell, who as a student and teacher of vocal physiology had unusual qualifications for determining feasible methods of speech transmission, constructed his first pair of magneto telephones for such a purpose. In February of 1876 his first telephone patent was applied for, and in March it was issued. The first published account of the modern speaking telephone was a paper read by Bell before the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in Boston in May of that year; while at the Centennial Exposition at Philadelphia the public first gained any familiarity with it. It was greeted at once with scientific acclaim and enthusiasm as a distinctly new and great invention, although at first it was regarded more as a scientific toy than as a commercially valuable device.
The Reis telephone was brought to America by Dr. P. H. Van der Weyde, a well-known physicist at the time, and he showcased it to a technical audience at Cooper Union in New York in 1868, shortly after which it was described in the technical press. The device drew attention, and Prof. Joseph Henry secured a set for the Smithsonian Institution. There, the renowned philosopher demonstrated and explained it to Alexander Graham Bell when the young and determined Scottish inventor sought help and information regarding harmonic telegraphy, on which he was working, as well as transmitting speech. Bell quickly and enthusiastically picked up the idea that his two predecessors had abandoned—and ultimately achieved success. In 1875, Bell, who had a unique background as a student and teacher of vocal physiology that helped him determine effective methods for speech transmission, built his first pair of magneto telephones for that purpose. In February 1876, he applied for his first telephone patent, which was granted in March. The first published account of the modern speaking telephone was a paper presented by Bell before the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in Boston in May of that year; the public first became familiar with it at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia. It was immediately met with scientific recognition and enthusiasm as a distinctly new and significant invention, although initially, it was viewed more as a scientific novelty than a commercially valuable device.
By an extraordinary coincidence, the very day that Bell's application for a patent went into the United States Patent Office, a caveat was filed there by Elisha Gray, of Chicago, covering the specific idea of transmitting speech and reproducing it in a telegraphic circuit "through an instrument capable of vibrating responsively to all the tones of the human voice, and by which they are rendered audible." Out of this incident arose a struggle and a controversy whose echoes are yet heard as to the legal and moral rights of the two inventors, the assertion even being made that one of the most important claims of Gray, that on a liquid battery transmitter, was surreptitiously "lifted" into the Bell application, then covering only the magneto telephone. It was also asserted that the filing of the Gray caveat antedated by a few hours the filing of the Bell application. All such issues when brought to the American courts were brushed aside, the Bell patent being broadly maintained in all its remarkable breadth and fullness, embracing an entire art; but Gray was embittered and chagrined, and to the last expressed his belief that the honor and glory should have been his. The path of Gray to the telephone was a natural one. A Quaker carpenter who studied five years at Oberlin College, he took up electrical invention, and brought out many ingenious devices in rapid succession in the telegraphic field, including the now universal needle annunciator for hotels, etc., the useful telautograph, automatic self-adjusting relays, private-line printers—leading up to his famous "harmonic" system. This was based upon the principle that a sound produced in the presence of a reed or tuning-fork responding to the sound, and acting as the armature of a magnet in a closed circuit, would, by induction, set up electric impulses in the circuit and cause a distant magnet having a similarly tuned armature to produce the same tone or note. He also found that over the same wire at the same time another series of impulses corresponding to another note could be sent through the agency of a second set of magnets without in any way interfering with the first series of impulses. Building the principle into apparatus, with a keyboard and vibrating "reeds" before his magnets, Doctor Gray was able not only to transmit music by his harmonic telegraph, but went so far as to send nine different telegraph messages at the same instant, each set of instruments depending on its selective note, while any intermediate office could pick up the message for itself by simply tuning its relays to the keynote required. Theoretically the system could be split up into any number of notes and semi-tones. Practically it served as the basis of some real telegraphic work, but is not now in use. Any one can realize, however, that it did not take so acute and ingenious a mind very long to push forward to the telephone, as a dangerous competitor with Bell, who had also, like Edison, been working assiduously in the field of acoustic and multiple telegraphs. Seen in the retrospect, the struggle for the goal at this moment was one of the memorable incidents in electrical history.
By an incredible coincidence, on the exact day that Bell submitted his patent application to the United States Patent Office, Elisha Gray from Chicago filed a caveat there that covered the specific idea of transmitting speech and reproducing it in a telegraphic circuit "through an instrument capable of vibrating responsively to all the tones of the human voice, and by which they are rendered audible." This incident triggered a battle and a dispute whose ramifications are still felt today regarding the legal and moral rights of the two inventors, with claims being made that one of Gray's most significant claims, related to a liquid battery transmitter, was secretly "lifted" into Bell's application, which initially only covered the magneto telephone. It was also claimed that Gray's caveat was filed just a few hours before Bell's application. When these issues were brought to the American courts, they were dismissed, and the Bell patent was upheld in all its impressive scope, encompassing the entire art; however, Gray was left bitter and frustrated, asserting until his death that the honor and recognition should have belonged to him. Gray's journey to the telephone was a natural progression. A Quaker carpenter who studied for five years at Oberlin College, he turned to electrical invention and quickly produced many clever devices in the telegraphic field, including the now-common needle annunciator for hotels, an effective telautograph, automatic self-adjusting relays, private-line printers—leading to his renowned "harmonic" system. This system was based on the principle that a sound produced in the presence of a reed or tuning fork that responds to that sound, acting as the armature of a magnet in a closed circuit, would induce electric impulses in the circuit and cause a distant magnet with a similarly tuned armature to produce the same tone or note. He also discovered that over the same wire, another series of impulses corresponding to a different note could simultaneously be sent through a second set of magnets without interfering with the first set. By building this principle into apparatus with a keyboard and vibrating "reeds" before his magnets, Dr. Gray could not only transmit music via his harmonic telegraph but also send out nine different telegraph messages at the same time, with each set of instruments relying on its specific note, while any intermediate office could retrieve the message for itself by simply tuning its relays to the required keynote. Theoretically, the system could be divided into any number of notes and semi-tones. Practically, it served as the foundation for some real telegraphic work, but it is no longer in use. Nevertheless, it's clear that it didn't take an exceptionally sharp and innovative mind long to advance to the telephone, posing a serious challenge to Bell, who, like Edison, had also been diligently working in the field of acoustic and multiple telegraphs. In hindsight, the race for this achievement at that moment stands out as one of the notable events in electrical history.
Among the interesting papers filed at the Orange Laboratory is a lithograph, the size of an ordinary patent drawing, headed "First Telephone on Record." The claim thus made goes back to the period when all was war, and when dispute was hot and rife as to the actual invention of the telephone. The device shown, made by Edison in 1875, was actually included in a caveat filed January 14, 1876, a month before Bell or Gray. It shows a little solenoid arrangement, with one end of the plunger attached to the diaphragm of a speaking or resonating chamber. Edison states that while the device is crudely capable of use as a magneto telephone, he did not invent it for transmitting speech, but as an apparatus for analyzing the complex waves arising from various sounds. It was made in pursuance of his investigations into the subject of harmonic telegraphs. He did not try the effect of sound-waves produced by the human voice until Bell came forward a few months later; but he found then that this device, made in 1875, was capable of use as a telephone. In his testimony and public utterances Edison has always given Bell credit for the discovery of the transmission of articulate speech by talking against a diaphragm placed in front of an electromagnet; but it is only proper here to note, in passing, the curious fact that he had actually produced a device that COULD talk, prior to 1876, and was therefore very close to Bell, who took the one great step further. A strong characterization of the value and importance of the work done by Edison in the development of the carbon transmitter will be found in the decision of Judge Brown in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting in Boston, on February 27, 1901, declaring void the famous Berliner patent of the Bell telephone system. [5]
Among the interesting documents at the Orange Laboratory is a lithograph, the size of a typical patent drawing, labeled "First Telephone on Record." This claim dates back to a time when there was intense conflict and debate over who actually invented the telephone. The device displayed, created by Edison in 1875, was actually part of a caveat submitted on January 14, 1876, a month before Bell or Gray. It features a small solenoid setup, with one end of the plunger connected to the diaphragm of a speaking or resonating chamber. Edison explains that, while the device could be used as a basic magneto telephone, he didn’t design it for speech transmission, but rather as a tool for analyzing the complex waves produced by different sounds. It was part of his research into harmonic telegraphs. He didn’t test the effects of sound waves generated by the human voice until Bell emerged a few months later, but found that this device, made in 1875, could indeed function as a telephone. In his testimony and public statements, Edison has consistently credited Bell for discovering how to transmit clear speech by talking into a diaphragm in front of an electromagnet; however, it’s worth noting that he had actually created a device that COULD talk before 1876, thus being very close to Bell, who made that one significant advancement. A strong assessment of the significance and impact of Edison’s work on the development of the carbon transmitter can be found in the ruling of Judge Brown in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, in Boston, on February 27, 1901, which declared the famous Berliner patent of the Bell telephone system invalid. [5]
[Footnote 5: See Federal Reporter, vol. 109, p. 976 et seq.]
[Footnote 5: See Federal Reporter, vol. 109, p. 976 and following.]
Bell's patent of 1876 was of an all-embracing character, which only the make-and-break principle, if practical, could have escaped. It was pointed out in the patent that Bell discovered the great principle that electrical undulations induced by the vibrations of a current produced by sound-waves can be represented graphically by the same sinusoidal curve that expresses the original sound vibrations themselves; or, in other words, that a curve representing sound vibrations will correspond precisely to a curve representing electric impulses produced or generated by those identical sound vibrations—as, for example, when the latter impinge upon a diaphragm acting as an armature of an electromagnet, and which by movement to and fro sets up the electric impulses by induction. To speak plainly, the electric impulses correspond in form and character to the sound vibration which they represent. This reduced to a patent "claim" governed the art as firmly as a papal bull for centuries enabled Spain to hold the Western world. The language of the claim is: "The method of and apparatus for transmitting vocal or other sounds telegraphically as herein described, by causing electrical undulations similar in form to the vibrations of the air accompanying the said vocal or other sounds substantially as set forth." It was a long time, however, before the inclusive nature of this grant over every possible telephone was understood or recognized, and litigation for and against the patent lasted during its entire life. At the outset, the commercial value of the telephone was little appreciated by the public, and Bell had the greatest difficulty in securing capital; but among far-sighted inventors there was an immediate "rush to the gold fields." Bell's first apparatus was poor, the results being described by himself as "unsatisfactory and discouraging," which was almost as true of the devices he exhibited at the Philadelphia Centennial. The new-comers, like Edison, Berliner, Blake, Hughes, Gray, Dolbear, and others, brought a wealth of ideas, a fund of mechanical ingenuity, and an inventive ability which soon made the telephone one of the most notable gains of the century, and one of the most valuable additions to human resources. The work that Edison did was, as usual, marked by infinite variety of method as well as by the power to seize on the one needed element of practical success. Every one of the six million telephones in use in the United States, and of the other millions in use through out the world, bears the imprint of his genius, as at one time the instruments bore his stamped name. For years his name was branded on every Bell telephone set, and his patents were a mainstay of what has been popularly called the "Bell monopoly." Speaking of his own efforts in this field, Mr. Edison says:
Bell's patent from 1876 was very comprehensive, and only the make-and-break principle could have avoided it, if it were practical. The patent highlighted that Bell discovered the key principle that electrical undulations caused by the vibrations of a current produced by sound waves can be graphically represented by the same sinusoidal curve that shows the original sound vibrations. In simpler terms, a curve representing sound vibrations directly corresponds to a curve representing the electric impulses created by those same sound vibrations. This happens when sound waves hit a diaphragm acting as the armature of an electromagnet, causing it to move back and forth and generate electric impulses through induction. In short, the electric impulses are shaped and characterized like the sound vibrations they represent. This was laid out in a patent "claim" that governed the field as firmly as a papal decree allowed Spain to dominate the Western world for centuries. The claim states: "The method of and apparatus for transmitting vocal or other sounds telegraphically as herein described, by causing electrical undulations similar in form to the vibrations of the air accompanying the said vocal or other sounds substantially as set forth." However, it took a long time for people to understand or recognize how all-encompassing this patent was for every possible telephone, and legal battles concerning the patent continued throughout its entire existence. At first, the public didn’t see much value in the telephone, and Bell struggled to find investors; however, visionary inventors quickly rushed to get involved. Bell's first device was subpar, and he described the results as "unsatisfactory and discouraging," a sentiment that also applied to the devices he showcased at the Philadelphia Centennial. Newcomers like Edison, Berliner, Blake, Hughes, Gray, Dolbear, and others brought a wealth of ideas, mechanical skill, and inventive talent that soon turned the telephone into one of the century's most significant inventions and a crucial addition to human resources. Edison's work was, as always, marked by a diversity of methods and the ability to identify what was necessary for practical success. Each of the six million telephones used in the United States, along with millions more around the world, carries the mark of his genius, just as the instruments once bore his stamped name. For years, his name was imprinted on every Bell telephone set, and his patents were fundamental to what has come to be known as the "Bell monopoly." Regarding his own contributions to this field, Mr. Edison says:
"In 1876 I started again to experiment for the Western Union and Mr. Orton. This time it was the telephone. Bell invented the first telephone, which consisted of the present receiver, used both as a transmitter and a receiver (the magneto type). It was attempted to introduce it commercially, but it failed on account of its faintness and the extraneous sounds which came in on its wires from various causes. Mr. Orton wanted me to take hold of it and make it commercial. As I had also been working on a telegraph system employing tuning-forks, simultaneously with both Bell and Gray, I was pretty familiar with the subject. I started in, and soon produced the carbon transmitter, which is now universally used.
"In 1876, I began experimenting again for Western Union and Mr. Orton. This time, it was the telephone. Bell invented the first telephone, which had the current receiver that worked as both a transmitter and a receiver (the magneto type). Efforts were made to introduce it commercially, but it failed due to its weak sound quality and the unwanted noise that came through its wires for various reasons. Mr. Orton wanted me to take it on and commercialize it. Since I had also been working on a telegraph system using tuning forks, alongside both Bell and Gray, I was quite familiar with the topic. I got to work and quickly developed the carbon transmitter, which is now used everywhere."
"Tests were made between New York and Philadelphia, also between New York and Washington, using regular Western Union wires. The noises were so great that not a word could be heard with the Bell receiver when used as a transmitter between New York and Newark, New Jersey. Mr. Orton and W. K. Vanderbilt and the board of directors witnessed and took part in the tests. The Western Union then put them on private lines. Mr. Theodore Puskas, of Budapest, Hungary, was the first man to suggest a telephone exchange, and soon after exchanges were established. The telephone department was put in the hands of Hamilton McK. Twombly, Vanderbilt's ablest son-in-law, who made a success of it. The Bell company, of Boston, also started an exchange, and the fight was on, the Western Union pirating the Bell receiver, and the Boston company pirating the Western Union transmitter. About this time I wanted to be taken care of. I threw out hints of this desire. Then Mr. Orton sent for me. He had learned that inventors didn't do business by the regular process, and concluded he would close it right up. He asked me how much I wanted. I had made up my mind it was certainly worth $25,000, if it ever amounted to anything for central-station work, so that was the sum I had in mind to stick to and get—obstinately. Still it had been an easy job, and only required a few months, and I felt a little shaky and uncertain. So I asked him to make me an offer. He promptly said he would give me $100,000. 'All right,' I said. 'It is yours on one condition, and that is that you do not pay it all at once, but pay me at the rate of $6000 per year for seventeen years'—the life of the patent. He seemed only too pleased to do this, and it was closed. My ambition was about four times too large for my business capacity, and I knew that I would soon spend this money experimenting if I got it all at once, so I fixed it that I couldn't. I saved seventeen years of worry by this stroke."
"Tests were conducted between New York and Philadelphia, as well as between New York and Washington, using regular Western Union wires. The noise was so loud that not a single word could be heard with the Bell receiver when used as a transmitter between New York and Newark, New Jersey. Mr. Orton, W. K. Vanderbilt, and the board of directors attended and participated in the tests. Western Union then moved them to private lines. Mr. Theodore Puskas, from Budapest, Hungary, was the first person to suggest a telephone exchange, and before long, exchanges were set up. The telephone department was entrusted to Hamilton McK. Twombly, Vanderbilt's most capable son-in-law, who made it successful. The Bell company from Boston also started an exchange, and competition began, with Western Union copying the Bell receiver and the Boston company copying the Western Union transmitter. Around this time, I wanted to be taken care of. I hinted at this desire. Then Mr. Orton called for me. He had discovered that inventors didn’t operate like regular businesses and decided to wrap things up quickly. He asked me how much I wanted. I had decided it was definitely worth $25,000, if it ever led to anything significant for central-station work, so that was the amount I intended to stick to and obtain—stubbornly. Still, it had been an easy job, taking only a few months, and I felt a bit anxious and unsure. So I asked him to make me an offer. He immediately said he would give me $100,000. 'All right,' I replied. 'It's yours on one condition: that you don’t pay it all at once, but at the rate of $6,000 per year for seventeen years'—the life of the patent. He seemed more than happy to agree, and it was finalized. My ambitions were about four times greater than my business skills, and I knew I would quickly burn through that money experimenting if I received it all at once, so I arranged it so I couldn't. I saved myself seventeen years of stress with this decision."
Thus modestly is told the debut of Edison in the telephone art, to which with his carbon transmitter he gave the valuable principle of varying the resistance of the transmitting circuit with changes in the pressure, as well as the vital practice of using the induction coil as a means of increasing the effective length of the talking circuit. Without these, modern telephony would not and could not exist. [6] But Edison, in telephonic work, as in other directions, was remarkably fertile and prolific. His first inventions in the art, made in 1875-76, continue through many later years, including all kinds of carbon instruments —the water telephone, electrostatic telephone, condenser telephone, chemical telephone, various magneto telephones, inertia telephone, mercury telephone, voltaic pile telephone, musical transmitter, and the electromotograph. All were actually made and tested.
Thus modestly is told the debut of Edison in the telephone industry, to which he contributed the valuable principle of varying the resistance of the transmitting circuit with changes in pressure via his carbon transmitter, as well as the crucial practice of using the induction coil to increase the effective length of the talking circuit. Without these, modern telephony would not and could not exist. [6] But Edison, in his work with telephones, as in other areas, was remarkably inventive and prolific. His first inventions in the field, created in 1875-76, continued to be relevant for many years, including all sorts of carbon instruments — the water telephone, electrostatic telephone, condenser telephone, chemical telephone, various magneto telephones, inertia telephone, mercury telephone, voltaic pile telephone, musical transmitter, and the electromotograph. All were actually made and tested.
[Footnote 6: Briefly stated, the essential difference between Bell's telephone and Edison's is this: With the former the sound vibrations impinge upon a steel diaphragm arranged adjacent to the pole of a bar electromagnet, whereby the diaphragm acts as an armature, and by its vibrations induces very weak electric impulses in the magnetic coil. These impulses, according to Bell's theory, correspond in form to the sound-waves, and passing over the line energize the magnet coil at the receiving end, and by varying the magnetism cause the receiving diaphragm to be similarly vibrated to reproduce the sounds. A single apparatus is therefore used at each end, performing the double function of transmitter and receiver. With Edison's telephone a closed circuit is used on which is constantly flowing a battery current, and included in that circuit is a pair of electrodes, one or both of which is of carbon. These electrodes are always in contact with a certain initial pressure, so that current will be always flowing over the circuit. One of the electrodes is connected with the diaphragm on which the sound-waves impinge, and the vibration of this diaphragm causes the pressure between the electrodes to be correspondingly varied, and thereby effects a variation in the current, resulting in the production of impulses which actuate the receiving magnet. In other words, with Bell's telephone the sound-waves themselves generate the electric impulses, which are hence extremely faint. With the Edison telephone, the sound-waves actuate an electric valve, so to speak, and permit variations in a current of any desired strength. A second distinction between the two telephones is this: With the Bell apparatus the very weak electric impulses generated by the vibration of the transmitting diaphragm pass over the entire line to the receiving end, and in consequence the permissible length of line is limited to a few miles under ideal conditions. With Edison's telephone the battery current does not flow on the main line, but passes through the primary circuit of an induction coil, by which corresponding impulses of enormously higher potential are sent out on the main line to the receiving end. In consequence, the line may be hundreds of miles in length. No modern telephone system in use to-day lacks these characteristic features—the varying resistance and the induction coil.]
[Footnote 6: In short, the main difference between Bell's telephone and Edison's is this: In Bell's version, sound vibrations hit a steel diaphragm placed next to a bar electromagnet. This diaphragm acts as an armature, and its vibrations create very weak electric impulses in the magnetic coil. According to Bell's theory, these impulses match the shape of the sound waves, and as they travel along the line, they energize the magnet coil at the receiving end, causing the receiving diaphragm to vibrate in a way that reproduces the sounds. Thus, a single device is used at each end, functioning as both a transmitter and receiver. In contrast, Edison's telephone employs a closed circuit with a constant battery current running through it, which includes a pair of electrodes, at least one of which is made of carbon. These electrodes maintain contact under a specific initial pressure, ensuring that current is always flowing through the circuit. One electrode connects to the diaphragm where sound waves arrive, and the movement of this diaphragm changes the pressure between the electrodes, resulting in a variation in the current that produces impulses activating the receiving magnet. In other words, Bell's telephone generates very faint electric impulses directly from the sound waves, while Edison's telephone uses the sound waves to control an electric valve, allowing for changes in a current of any desired strength. Another distinction between the two telephones is that with the Bell device, the weak electric impulses created by the transmitting diaphragm travel over the entire line to the receiving end, limiting the length of the line to a few miles under perfect conditions. On the other hand, Edison's telephone routes the battery current not through the main line, but through the primary circuit of an induction coil, which sends out much higher potential impulses along the main line to the receiving end. As a result, the line can be hundreds of miles long. No modern telephone system in use today lacks these characteristic features—the varying resistance and the induction coil.]
The principle of the electromotograph was utilized by Edison in more ways than one, first of all in telegraphy at this juncture. The well-known Page patent, which had lingered in the Patent Office for years, had just been issued, and was considered a formidable weapon. It related to the use of a retractile spring to withdraw the armature lever from the magnet of a telegraph or other relay or sounder, and thus controlled the art of telegraphy, except in simple circuits. "There was no known way," remarks Edison, "whereby this patent could be evaded, and its possessor would eventually control the use of what is known as the relay and sounder, and this was vital to telegraphy. Gould was pounding the Western Union on the Stock Exchange, disturbing its railroad contracts, and, being advised by his lawyers that this patent was of great value, bought it. The moment Mr. Orton heard this he sent for me and explained the situation, and wanted me to go to work immediately and see if I couldn't evade it or discover some other means that could be used in case Gould sustained the patent. It seemed a pretty hard job, because there was no known means of moving a lever at the other end of a telegraph wire except by the use of a magnet. I said I would go at it that night. In experimenting some years previously, I had discovered a very peculiar phenomenon, and that was that if a piece of metal connected to a battery was rubbed over a moistened piece of chalk resting on a metal connected to the other pole, when the current passed the friction was greatly diminished. When the current was reversed the friction was greatly increased over what it was when no current was passing. Remembering this, I substituted a piece of chalk rotated by a small electric motor for the magnet, and connecting a sounder to a metallic finger resting on the chalk, the combination claim of Page was made worthless. A hitherto unknown means was introduced in the electric art. Two or three of the devices were made and tested by the company's expert. Mr. Orton, after he had me sign the patent application and got it in the Patent Office, wanted to settle for it at once. He asked my price. Again I said: 'Make me an offer.' Again he named $100,000. I accepted, providing he would pay it at the rate of $6000 a year for seventeen years. This was done, and thus, with the telephone money, I received $12,000 yearly for that period from the Western Union Telegraph Company."
The principle of the electromotograph was used by Edison in various ways, particularly in telegraphy at this time. The well-known Page patent, which had sat in the Patent Office for years, had just been issued and was considered a powerful tool. It involved using a retractable spring to pull the armature lever away from the magnet of a telegraph or other relay or sounder, thus controlling telegraphy, except in simple circuits. "There was no known way," Edison remarked, "to get around this patent, and its owner would ultimately control the use of what is called the relay and sounder, which was essential to telegraphy. Gould was aggressively trading the Western Union stock, disrupting its railroad contracts and, after his lawyers informed him that this patent was very valuable, he bought it. As soon as Mr. Orton heard this, he called me in, explained the situation, and wanted me to start working immediately to see if I could find a way to bypass it or discover another method that could be used if Gould upheld the patent. It seemed like a tough challenge, as there was no known way to move a lever at the other end of a telegraph wire without using a magnet. I said I would get started that night. In experiments I had conducted years earlier, I found a peculiar phenomenon: if a piece of metal connected to a battery was rubbed over a damp piece of chalk sitting on a metal connected to the other pole, the friction greatly decreased when the current flowed. When the current was reversed, the friction increased significantly compared to when there was no current. Remembering this, I replaced the magnet with a piece of chalk spun by a small electric motor and connected a sounder to a metallic finger resting on the chalk, rendering the Page's combination claim useless. A previously unknown method was introduced in the electric art. Two or three of the devices were created and tested by the company's expert. After having me sign the patent application and submitting it to the Patent Office, Mr. Orton wanted to finalize compensation immediately. He asked for my price. Once again, I said, 'Make me an offer.' He quoted $100,000. I accepted, provided he paid it at a rate of $6,000 per year for seventeen years. This was arranged, and thus, with the money from the telephone, I received $12,000 annually from the Western Union Telegraph Company for that duration."
A year or two later the motograph cropped up again in Edison's work in a curious manner. The telephone was being developed in England, and Edison had made arrangements with Colonel Gouraud, his old associate in the automatic telegraph, to represent his interests. A company was formed, a large number of instruments were made and sent to Gouraud in London, and prospects were bright. Then there came a threat of litigation from the owners of the Bell patent, and Gouraud found he could not push the enterprise unless he could avoid using what was asserted to be an infringement of the Bell receiver. He cabled for help to Edison, who sent back word telling him to hold the fort. "I had recourse again," says Edison, "to the phenomenon discovered by me years previous, that the friction of a rubbing electrode passing over a moist chalk surface was varied by electricity. I devised a telephone receiver which was afterward known as the 'loud-speaking telephone,' or 'chalk receiver.' There was no magnet, simply a diaphragm and a cylinder of compressed chalk about the size of a thimble. A thin spring connected to the centre of the diaphragm extended outwardly and rested on the chalk cylinder, and was pressed against it with a pressure equal to that which would be due to a weight of about six pounds. The chalk was rotated by hand. The volume of sound was very great. A person talking into the carbon transmitter in New York had his voice so amplified that he could be heard one thousand feet away in an open field at Menlo Park. This great excess of power was due to the fact that the latter came from the person turning the handle. The voice, instead of furnishing all the power as with the present receiver, merely controlled the power, just as an engineer working a valve would control a powerful engine.
A year or two later, the motograph appeared again in Edison's work in an interesting way. The telephone was being developed in England, and Edison had arranged for Colonel Gouraud, his old partner in the automatic telegraph, to represent his interests. A company was formed, a large number of instruments were manufactured and sent to Gouraud in London, and the outlook was promising. Then there was a threat of legal action from the owners of the Bell patent, and Gouraud realized he couldn’t move forward with the project unless he could avoid using what was claimed to be an infringement of the Bell receiver. He cabled Edison for help, who replied telling him to hold the line. "I went back," says Edison, "to the phenomenon I had discovered years earlier, where the friction of a rubbing electrode moving over a moist chalk surface was affected by electricity. I created a telephone receiver that later became known as the 'loud-speaking telephone' or 'chalk receiver.' There was no magnet, just a diaphragm and a cylinder of compressed chalk about the size of a thimble. A thin spring connected to the center of the diaphragm extended outwardly and pressed against the chalk cylinder with a force equivalent to a weight of about six pounds. The chalk was rotated by hand. The volume of sound was enormous. A person talking into the carbon transmitter in New York had their voice amplified so much that it could be heard a thousand feet away in an open field at Menlo Park. This significant increase in power was because that came from the person turning the handle. The voice, instead of providing all the power like the current receiver, merely controlled the power, similar to how an engineer operates a valve to control a powerful engine.
"I made six of these receivers and sent them in charge of an expert on the first steamer. They were welcomed and tested, and shortly afterward I shipped a hundred more. At the same time I was ordered to send twenty young men, after teaching them to become expert. I set up an exchange, around the laboratory, of ten instruments. I would then go out and get each one out of order in every conceivable way, cutting the wires of one, short-circuiting another, destroying the adjustment of a third, putting dirt between the electrodes of a fourth, and so on. A man would be sent to each to find out the trouble. When he could find the trouble ten consecutive times, using five minutes each, he was sent to London. About sixty men were sifted to get twenty. Before all had arrived, the Bell company there, seeing we could not be stopped, entered into negotiations for consolidation. One day I received a cable from Gouraud offering '30,000' for my interest. I cabled back I would accept. When the draft came I was astonished to find it was for L30,000. I had thought it was dollars."
"I made six of these receivers and sent them with an expert on the first steamer. They were received and tested, and shortly after that, I shipped a hundred more. At the same time, I was instructed to send twenty young men after training them to become experts. I organized a swap around the lab with ten instruments. I would then go out and break each one in every possible way—cutting the wire on one, short-circuiting another, messing up the adjustment on a third, putting dirt between the electrodes of a fourth, and so on. A person would be sent to each one to identify the issue. When he could find the problem ten times in a row, taking five minutes each time, he was sent to London. About sixty men were filtered down to twenty. Before all of them had arrived, the Bell company there, seeing we couldn't be stopped, started negotiations for a merger. One day, I got a cable from Gouraud offering '30,000' for my share. I wired back that I would accept. When the draft arrived, I was shocked to find it was for L30,000. I had thought it was in dollars."
In regard to this singular and happy conclusion, Edison makes some interesting comments as to the attitude of the courts toward inventors, and the difference between American and English courts. "The men I sent over were used to establish telephone exchanges all over the Continent, and some of them became wealthy. It was among this crowd in London that Bernard Shaw was employed before he became famous. The chalk telephone was finally discarded in favor of the Bell receiver—the latter being more simple and cheaper. Extensive litigation with new-comers followed. My carbon-transmitter patent was sustained, and preserved the monopoly of the telephone in England for many years. Bell's patent was not sustained by the courts. Sir Richard Webster, now Chief-Justice of England, was my counsel, and sustained all of my patents in England for many years. Webster has a marvellous capacity for understanding things scientific; and his address before the courts was lucidity itself. His brain is highly organized. My experience with the legal fraternity is that scientific subjects are distasteful to them, and it is rare in this country, on account of the system of trying patent suits, for a judge really to reach the meat of the controversy, and inventors scarcely ever get a decision squarely and entirely in their favor. The fault rests, in my judgment, almost wholly with the system under which testimony to the extent of thousands of pages bearing on all conceivable subjects, many of them having no possible connection with the invention in dispute, is presented to an over-worked judge in an hour or two of argument supported by several hundred pages of briefs; and the judge is supposed to extract some essence of justice from this mass of conflicting, blind, and misleading statements. It is a human impossibility, no matter how able and fair-minded the judge may be. In England the case is different. There the judges are face to face with the experts and other witnesses. They get the testimony first-hand and only so much as they need, and there are no long-winded briefs and arguments, and the case is decided then and there, a few months perhaps after suit is brought, instead of many years afterward, as in this country. And in England, when a case is once finally decided it is settled for the whole country, while here it is not so. Here a patent having once been sustained, say, in Boston, may have to be litigated all over again in New York, and again in Philadelphia, and so on for all the Federal circuits. Furthermore, it seems to me that scientific disputes should be decided by some court containing at least one or two scientific men—men capable of comprehending the significance of an invention and the difficulties of its accomplishment—if justice is ever to be given to an inventor. And I think, also, that this court should have the power to summon before it and examine any recognized expert in the special art, who might be able to testify to FACTS for or against the patent, instead of trying to gather the truth from the tedious essays of hired experts, whose depositions are really nothing but sworn arguments. The real gist of patent suits is generally very simple, and I have no doubt that any judge of fair intelligence, assisted by one or more scientific advisers, could in a couple of days at the most examine all the necessary witnesses; hear all the necessary arguments, and actually decide an ordinary patent suit in a way that would more nearly be just, than can now be done at an expenditure of a hundred times as much money and months and years of preparation. And I have no doubt that the time taken by the court would be enormously less, because if a judge attempts to read the bulky records and briefs, that work alone would require several days.
Regarding this unique and positive outcome, Edison shares some interesting thoughts on how courts view inventors and the differences between American and English legal systems. "The men I sent over were experienced in setting up telephone exchanges all across the continent, and some of them became quite wealthy. It was among this group in London that Bernard Shaw worked before he became famous. The chalk telephone was eventually replaced by the Bell receiver, which was simpler and cheaper. There was extensive litigation with newcomers. My carbon-transmitter patent was upheld, keeping the telephone monopoly in England for many years. Bell's patent was not upheld by the courts. Sir Richard Webster, who is now the Chief Justice of England, was my lawyer and defended all my patents in England for many years. Webster has an incredible ability to grasp scientific concepts, and his presentations in court were crystal clear. His mind is highly organized. My experience with the legal community is that they find scientific topics unappealing, and it’s rare in this country, due to how patent cases are tried, for a judge to truly get to the heart of the matter. Inventors hardly ever receive a ruling completely in their favor. I believe the issue lies almost entirely with the system, where thousands of pages of testimony on all kinds of topics, many unrelated to the invention in question, are presented to an overworked judge in just an hour or two, backed up by several hundred pages of briefs. The judge is expected to distill fairness from this overwhelming mass of conflicting, vague, and misleading statements. It’s nearly impossible, no matter how competent and impartial the judge might be. In England, the situation is different. There, judges interact directly with experts and witnesses. They receive firsthand testimony and only as much as necessary, with no long-winded briefs or arguments, and the case is decided on the spot, usually a few months after the lawsuit is filed, rather than years later like in this country. Additionally, once a case is finally settled in England, it applies to the whole country, whereas here, a patent upheld in Boston may need to be litigated again in New York, then in Philadelphia, and so on for all the Federal circuits. Furthermore, I think scientific disputes should be handled by a court that includes at least one or two scientific professionals—people who can understand the significance of an invention and the challenges in creating it—if we want justice for inventors. I also believe this court should be able to summon any recognized expert in the relevant field to provide factual testimony for or against the patent, instead of relying on the lengthy reports of hired experts, whose depositions often end up being just sworn arguments. The core of patent disputes is usually quite straightforward, and I’m confident that any reasonably intelligent judge, with the help of one or more scientific advisers, could evaluate all necessary witnesses, hear all essential arguments, and make a decision in an ordinary patent case in just a couple of days, resulting in a fairer outcome than what can currently be achieved spending a hundred times as much money and many months or years preparing. I’m also convinced that the time spent by the court would be significantly less because if a judge tries to read the extensive records and briefs, that task alone would take several days."
"Acting as judges, inventors would not be very apt to correctly decide a complicated law point; and on the other hand, it is hard to see how a lawyer can decide a complicated scientific point rightly. Some inventors complain of our Patent Office, but my own experience with the Patent Office is that the examiners are fair-minded and intelligent, and when they refuse a patent they are generally right; but I think the whole trouble lies with the system in vogue in the Federal courts for trying patent suits, and in the fact, which cannot be disputed, that the Federal judges, with but few exceptions, do not comprehend complicated scientific questions. To secure uniformity in the several Federal circuits and correct errors, it has been proposed to establish a central court of patent appeals in Washington. This I believe in; but this court should also contain at least two scientific men, who would not be blind to the sophistry of paid experts. [7] Men whose inventions would have created wealth of millions have been ruined and prevented from making any money whereby they could continue their careers as creators of wealth for the general good, just because the experts befuddled the judge by their misleading statements."
"Inventors aren't likely to make correct decisions on complicated legal issues, and it's tough to see how lawyers can accurately judge complex scientific matters. Some inventors have issues with our Patent Office, but based on my experience, the examiners are fair and knowledgeable, and when they reject a patent, they're usually right. I believe the real problem lies with the system used in the Federal courts for patent cases, and the undeniable fact that most Federal judges struggle to understand complex scientific questions. To ensure consistency across Federal circuits and fix mistakes, there's been a proposal to create a central court for patent appeals in Washington. I support this idea, but this court should include at least two scientific experts who won’t be swayed by the tricks of hired professionals. People whose inventions could have generated millions have been held back and prevented from making any money to fund their careers as creators of wealth for everyone, just because misleading expert testimony confused the judge."
[Footnote 7: As an illustration of the perplexing nature of expert evidence in patent cases, the reader will probably be interested in perusing the following extracts from the opinion of Judge Dayton, in the suit of Bryce Bros. Co. vs. Seneca Glass Co., tried in the United States Circuit Court, Northern District of West Virginia, reported in The Federal Reporter, 140, page 161: "On this subject of the validity of this patent, a vast amount of conflicting, technical, perplexing, and almost hypercritical discussion and opinion has been indulged, both in the testimony and in the able and exhaustive arguments and briefs of counsel. Expert Osborn for defendant, after setting forth minutely his superior qualifications mechanical education, and great experience, takes up in detail the patent claims, and shows to his own entire satisfaction that none of them are new; that all of them have been applied, under one form or another, in some twenty-two previous patents, and in two other machines, not patented, to-wit, the Central Glass and Kuny Kahbel ones; that the whole machine is only 'an aggregation of well-known mechanical elements that any skilled designer would bring to his use in the construction of such a machine.' This certainly, under ordinary conditions, would settle the matter beyond peradventure; for this witness is a very wise and learned man in these things, and very positive. But expert Clarke appears for the plaintiff, and after setting forth just as minutely his superior qualifications, mechanical education, and great experience, which appear fully equal in all respects to those of expert Osborn, proceeds to take up in detail the patent claims, and shows to his entire satisfaction that all, with possibly one exception, are new, show inventive genius, and distinct advances upon the prior art. In the most lucid, and even fascinating, way he discusses all the parts of this machine, compares it with the others, draws distinctions, points out the merits of the one in controversy and the defects of all the others, considers the twenty-odd patents referred to by Osborn, and in the politest, but neatest, manner imaginable shows that expert Osborn did not know what he was talking about, and sums the whole matter up by declaring this 'invention of Mr. Schrader's, as embodied in the patent in suit, a radical and wide departure, from the Kahbel machine' (admitted on all sides to be nearest prior approach to it), 'a distinct and important advance in the art of engraving glassware, and generally a machine for this purpose which has involved the exercise of the inventive faculty in the highest degree.' "Thus a more radical and irreconcilable disagreement between experts touching the same thing could hardly be found. So it is with the testimony. If we take that for the defendant, the Central Glass Company machine, and especially the Kuny Kahbel machine, built and operated years before this patent issued, and not patented, are just as good, just as effective and practical, as this one, and capable of turning out just as perfect work and as great a variety of it. On the other hand, if we take that produced by the plaintiff, we are driven to the conclusion that these prior machines, the product of the same mind, were only progressive steps forward from utter darkness, so to speak, into full inventive sunlight, which made clear to him the solution of the problem in this patented machine. The shortcomings of the earlier machines are minutely set forth, and the witnesses for the plaintiff are clear that they are neither practical nor profitable. "But this is not all of the trouble that confronts us in this case. Counsel of both sides, with an indomitable courage that must command admiration, a courage that has led them to a vast amount of study, investigation, and thought, that in fact has made them all experts, have dissected this record of 356 closely printed pages, applied all mechanical principles and laws to the facts as they see them, and, besides, have ransacked the law-books and cited an enormous number of cases, more or less in point, as illustration of their respective contentions. The courts find nothing more difficult than to apply an abstract principle to all classes of cases that may arise. The facts in each case so frequently create an exception to the general rule that such rule must be honored rather in its breach than in its observance. Therefore, after a careful examination of these cases, it is no criticism of the courts to say that both sides have found abundant and about an equal amount of authority to sustain their respective contentions, and, as a result, counsel have submitted, in briefs, a sum total of 225 closely printed pages, in which they have clearly, yet, almost to a mathematical certainty, demonstrated on the one side that this Schrader machine is new and patentable, and on the other that it is old and not so. Under these circumstances, it would be unnecessary labor and a fruitless task for me to enter into any further technical discussion of the mechanical problems involved, for the purpose of seeking to convince either side of its error. In cases of such perplexity as this generally some incidents appear that speak more unerringly than do the tongues of the witnesses, and to some of these I purpose to now refer."]
[Footnote 7: To illustrate the confusing nature of expert testimony in patent cases, you might find the following excerpts from Judge Dayton's opinion in the case of Bryce Bros. Co. vs. Seneca Glass Co., tried in the United States Circuit Court, Northern District of West Virginia, reported in The Federal Reporter, 140, page 161: "Regarding the validity of this patent, there has been a tremendous amount of conflicting, technical, confusing, and almost overly critical discussion and opinions presented in both the testimony and the thorough arguments and briefs from both sides. Expert Osborn for the defendant, after detailing his strong qualifications, mechanical education, and extensive experience, examines the patent claims and completely convinces himself that none of them are new; that all of them have been used in various forms in about twenty-two prior patents and in two other machines that are not patented, namely, the Central Glass and Kuny Kahbel machines; and that the entire machine is simply 'a collection of well-known mechanical elements that any skilled designer would use in building such a machine.' This would typically settle the matter beyond any doubt, as this witness is very knowledgeable and confident in his expertise. However, expert Clarke represents the plaintiff and, after presenting equally detailed credentials, mechanical education, and extensive experience that are on par with expert Osborn, proceeds to analyze the patent claims in detail and convincingly asserts that all of them, with maybe one exception, are new, exhibit inventive skill, and are significant improvements over the previous art. In a very clear and even engaging manner, he discusses all the components of this machine, compares it to others, highlights the merits of this one in question, points out the flaws of the others, examines the twenty-odd patents mentioned by Osborn, and, in the politest yet most precise manner possible, shows that expert Osborn misunderstood the subject, concluding that 'this invention of Mr. Schrader, as described in the patent in question, is a substantial and meaningful change from the Kahbel machine' (which everyone agrees is the closest prior version), 'a distinct and significant advancement in the field of glassware engraving, and overall a machine designed for this purpose that demonstrates the highest level of inventive creativity.' "Thus, it's hard to find a more extreme and irreconcilable disagreement among experts regarding the same topic. The testimony reflects this as well. If we consider the testimony supporting the defendant, the Central Glass Company machine, and specifically the Kuny Kahbel machine built and operated long before this patent was issued, and which are not patented, they are just as effective and practical as this one, producing just as high-quality work and a wide variety of it. Conversely, if we accept the testimony from the plaintiff’s side, we must conclude that the earlier machines, products of the same mind, were merely steps forward from complete obscurity, transitioning into the full light of invention that led to the solutions presented in this patented machine. The inadequacies of the earlier machines are thoroughly detailed, and the plaintiff's witnesses clearly state that those machines are neither practical nor profitable. "But this isn't the only challenge we face in this case. Counsel from both sides, with a tenacity that commands respect and has driven them to extensive study, investigation, and thoughtful analysis—essentially making them all experts—have thoroughly examined this detailed record of 356 closely printed pages, applying all mechanical principles and laws to the facts as they interpret them, and have also scoured legal texts, citing a vast number of relevant cases to support their various arguments. Courts find it particularly difficult to apply an abstract principle uniformly across all types of cases, as the specific facts frequently create exceptions to the general rules, often making it seem as though those rules are observed more in their breaches than in their adherence. Therefore, after carefully reviewing these cases, it’s fair to say that both sides have found plenty of authority, almost equally divided, to support their claims. Consequently, the attorneys have submitted a combined total of 225 closely printed pages, clearly and almost mathematically demonstrating on one side that this Schrader machine is new and patentable, while arguing on the other that it is old and thus not patentable. Given these circumstances, it would be an unnecessary and fruitless effort for me to engage in further technical discussions about the mechanical issues involved, aiming to convince either party of their respective errors. In cases of such complexity, certain incidents often emerge that speak more clearly than the testimonies of witnesses, and I will now refer to some of these."]
Mr. Bernard Shaw, the distinguished English author, has given a most vivid and amusing picture of this introduction of Edison's telephone into England, describing the apparatus as "a much too ingenious invention, being nothing less than a telephone of such stentorian efficiency that it bellowed your most private communications all over the house, instead of whispering them with some sort of discretion." Shaw, as a young man, was employed by the Edison Telephone Company, and was very much alive to his surroundings, often assisting in public demonstrations of the apparatus "in a manner which I am persuaded laid the foundation of Mr. Edison's reputation." The sketch of the men sent over from America is graphic: "Whilst the Edison Telephone Company lasted it crowded the basement of a high pile of offices in Queen Victoria Street with American artificers. These deluded and romantic men gave me a glimpse of the skilled proletariat of the United States. They sang obsolete sentimental songs with genuine emotion; and their language was frightful even to an Irishman. They worked with a ferocious energy which was out of all proportion to the actual result achieved. Indomitably resolved to assert their republican manhood by taking no orders from a tall-hatted Englishman whose stiff politeness covered his conviction that they were relatively to himself inferior and common persons, they insisted on being slave-driven with genuine American oaths by a genuine free and equal American foreman. They utterly despised the artfully slow British workman, who did as little for his wages as he possibly could; never hurried himself; and had a deep reverence for one whose pocket could be tapped by respectful behavior. Need I add that they were contemptuously wondered at by this same British workman as a parcel of outlandish adult boys who sweated themselves for their employer's benefit instead of looking after their own interest? They adored Mr. Edison as the greatest man of all time in every possible department of science, art, and philosophy, and execrated Mr. Graham Bell, the inventor of the rival telephone, as his Satanic adversary; but each of them had (or intended to have) on the brink of completion an improvement on the telephone, usually a new transmitter. They were free-souled creatures, excellent company, sensitive, cheerful, and profane; liars, braggarts, and hustlers, with an air of making slow old England hum, which never left them even when, as often happened, they were wrestling with difficulties of their own making, or struggling in no-thoroughfares, from which they had to be retrieved like stray sheep by Englishmen without imagination enough to go wrong."
Mr. Bernard Shaw, the renowned English writer, painted a vivid and funny picture of the introduction of Edison's telephone in England, describing the device as "an overly clever invention, being nothing less than a phone with such loud efficiency that it blasted your most private conversations all over the house, instead of discreetly whispering them." As a young man, Shaw worked for the Edison Telephone Company and was very aware of his surroundings, often helping with public demonstrations of the device, "in a way I believe contributed to Mr. Edison's reputation." His account of the men sent over from America is striking: "While the Edison Telephone Company was around, it filled the basement of a tall office building on Queen Victoria Street with American workers. These misguided and romantic men gave me a glimpse of the skilled working class of the United States. They sang outdated sentimental songs with real feeling, and their language was shocking even to an Irishman. They worked with a fierce energy that didn't match the actual results produced. Determined to assert their American pride by following no orders from a tall-hatted Englishman whose stiff politeness disguised his belief that they were inferior and common compared to him, they insisted on being driven by a genuine American foreman who used real American curses. They completely looked down on the slow British worker, who did as little as possible for his pay, never rushed, and had a deep respect for someone whose pocket could be tapped with courteous behavior. Should I mention that they were scornfully regarded by the same British worker as a bunch of outlandish grown boys who worked hard for their employer's benefit instead of looking after their own interests? They idolized Mr. Edison as the greatest man of all time in every field of science, art, and philosophy, while they condemned Mr. Graham Bell, the inventor of the competing telephone, as his evil rival; yet each of them had (or intended to have) an almost finished improvement on the telephone, usually a new transmitter. They were free-spirited individuals, great company, sensitive, cheerful, and foul-mouthed; liars, braggers, and hustlers, who had an air of making slow old England thrive, which never left them even when, as often happened, they were struggling with problems of their own making, or getting stuck in dead ends, from which they needed to be rescued like lost sheep by unimaginative Englishmen."
Mr. Samuel Insull, who afterward became private secretary to Mr. Edison, and a leader in the development of American electrical manufacturing and the central-station art, was also in close touch with the London situation thus depicted, being at the time private secretary to Colonel Gouraud, and acting for the first half hour as the amateur telephone operator in the first experimental exchange erected in Europe. He took notes of an early meeting where the affairs of the company were discussed by leading men like Sir John Lubbock (Lord Avebury) and the Right Hon. E. P. Bouverie (then a cabinet minister), none of whom could see in the telephone much more than an auxiliary for getting out promptly in the next morning's papers the midnight debates in Parliament. "I remember another incident," says Mr. Insull. "It was at some celebration of one of the Royal Societies at the Burlington House, Piccadilly. We had a telephone line running across the roofs to the basement of the building. I think it was to Tyndall's laboratory in Burlington Street. As the ladies and gentlemen came through, they naturally wanted to look at the great curiosity, the loud-speaking telephone: in fact, any telephone was a curiosity then. Mr. and Mrs. Gladstone came through. I was handling the telephone at the Burlington House end. Mrs. Gladstone asked the man over the telephone whether he knew if a man or woman was speaking; and the reply came in quite loud tones that it was a man!"
Mr. Samuel Insull, who later became private secretary to Mr. Edison and a key figure in advancing American electrical manufacturing and the central-station system, was also closely involved with the London situation described here. At that time, he was the private secretary to Colonel Gouraud and acted as the amateur telephone operator for the first half hour in the first experimental exchange set up in Europe. He took notes during an early meeting where the company's affairs were discussed by prominent figures like Sir John Lubbock (Lord Avebury) and the Right Hon. E. P. Bouverie (then a cabinet minister), none of whom saw the telephone as anything more than a tool for quickly getting the midnight debates in Parliament into the next morning’s papers. "I remember another incident," says Mr. Insull. "It was at a celebration for one of the Royal Societies at Burlington House, Piccadilly. We had a telephone line running across the roofs to the basement of the building. I believe it was connected to Tyndall's laboratory in Burlington Street. As the guests arrived, they naturally wanted to see the amazing loud-speaking telephone: any telephone was fascinating back then. Mr. and Mrs. Gladstone came through. I was managing the telephone at the Burlington House end. Mrs. Gladstone asked the man on the other end if he could tell whether it was a man or a woman speaking, and the response came back in loud tones that it was a man!"
With Mr. E. H. Johnson, who represented Edison, there went to England for the furtherance of this telephone enterprise, Mr. Charles Edison, a nephew of the inventor. He died in Paris, October, 1879, not twenty years of age. Stimulated by the example of his uncle, this brilliant youth had already made a mark for himself as a student and inventor, and when only eighteen he secured in open competition the contract to install a complete fire-alarm telegraph system for Port Huron. A few months later he was eagerly welcomed by his uncle at Menlo Park, and after working on the telephone was sent to London to aid in its introduction. There he made the acquaintance of Professor Tyndall, exhibited the telephone to the late King of England; and also won the friendship of the late King of the Belgians, with whom he took up the project of establishing telephonic communication between Belgium and England. At the time of his premature death he was engaged in installing the Edison quadruplex between Brussels and Paris, being one of the very few persons then in Europe familiar with the working of that invention.
With Mr. E. H. Johnson, who represented Edison, Mr. Charles Edison, the inventor's nephew, went to England to advance the telephone project. He passed away in Paris in October 1879, not yet twenty years old. Inspired by his uncle's example, this talented young man had already made a name for himself as a student and inventor, and at just eighteen, he won a competitive contract to set up a complete fire-alarm telegraph system for Port Huron. A few months later, he was warmly welcomed by his uncle at Menlo Park, and after working on the telephone, he was sent to London to help with its introduction. There, he met Professor Tyndall, demonstrated the telephone to the late King of England, and also became friends with the late King of the Belgians, with whom he began working on establishing telephone communication between Belgium and England. At the time of his untimely death, he was in the process of installing the Edison quadruplex between Brussels and Paris, being one of the very few people in Europe familiar with how that invention worked.
Meantime, the telephonic art in America was undergoing very rapid development. In March, 1878, addressing "the capitalists of the Electric Telephone Company" on the future of his invention, Bell outlined with prophetic foresight and remarkable clearness the coming of the modern telephone exchange. Comparing with gas and water distribution, he said: "In a similar manner, it is conceivable that cables of telephone wires could be laid underground or suspended overhead communicating by branch wires with private dwellings, country houses, shops, manufactories, etc., uniting them through the main cable with a central office, where the wire could be connected as desired, establishing direct communication between any two places in the city.... Not only so, but I believe, in the future, wires will unite the head offices of telephone companies in different cities; and a man in one part of the country may communicate by word of mouth with another in a distant place."
In the meantime, the telephone technology in America was developing very quickly. In March 1878, while talking to "the investors of the Electric Telephone Company" about the future of his invention, Bell clearly and with remarkable insight outlined the arrival of the modern telephone exchange. He compared it to gas and water distribution, saying: "In a similar way, it’s possible that cables of telephone wires could be run underground or hung overhead, connecting through branch wires to homes, country houses, shops, factories, etc., linking them through the main cable to a central office, where the wire could be connected as needed, allowing direct communication between any two locations in the city.... Furthermore, I believe that in the future, wires will connect the headquarters of telephone companies in different cities; and a person in one part of the country may communicate verbally with someone in a distant place."
All of which has come to pass. Professor Bell also suggested how this could be done by "the employ of a man in each central office for the purpose of connecting the wires as directed." He also indicated the two methods of telephonic tariff—a fixed rental and a toll; and mentioned the practice, now in use on long-distance lines, of a time charge. As a matter of fact, this "centralizing" was attempted in May, 1877, in Boston, with the circuits of the Holmes burglar-alarm system, four banking-houses being thus interconnected; while in January of 1878 the Bell telephone central-office system at New Haven, Connecticut, was opened for business, "the first fully equipped commercial telephone exchange ever established for public or general service."
All of this has happened. Professor Bell also suggested how this could be done by "hiring a person in each central office to connect the wires as instructed." He also pointed out the two ways of charging for phone service—a fixed rental and a toll; and mentioned the practice, now standard on long-distance lines, of a time charge. In fact, this "centralizing" was attempted in May 1877 in Boston, connecting the circuits of the Holmes burglar-alarm system, linking four banks together; while in January 1878, the Bell telephone central-office system in New Haven, Connecticut, started operating, marking "the first fully equipped commercial telephone exchange ever set up for public or general service."
All through this formative period Bell had adhered to and introduced the magneto form of telephone, now used only as a receiver, and very poorly adapted for the vital function of a speech-transmitter. From August, 1877, the Western Union Telegraph Company worked along the other line, and in 1878, with its allied Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, it brought into existence the American Speaking Telephone Company to introduce the Edison apparatus, and to create telephone exchanges all over the country. In this warfare, the possession of a good battery transmitter counted very heavily in favor of the Western Union, for upon that the real expansion of the whole industry depended; but in a few months the Bell system had its battery transmitter, too, tending to equalize matters. Late in the same year patent litigation was begun which brought out clearly the merits of Bell, through his patent, as the original and first inventor of the electric speaking telephone; and the Western Union Telegraph Company made terms with its rival. A famous contract bearing date of November 10, 1879, showed that under the Edison and other controlling patents the Western Union Company had already set going some eighty-five exchanges, and was making large quantities of telephonic apparatus. In return for its voluntary retirement from the telephonic field, the Western Union Telegraph Company, under this contract, received a royalty of 20 per cent. of all the telephone earnings of the Bell system while the Bell patents ran; and thus came to enjoy an annual income of several hundred thousand dollars for some years, based chiefly on its modest investment in Edison's work. It was also paid several thousand dollars in cash for the Edison, Phelps, Gray, and other apparatus on hand. It secured further 40 per cent. of the stock of the local telephone systems of New York and Chicago; and last, but by no means least, it exacted from the Bell interests an agreement to stay out of the telegraph field.
Throughout this crucial period, Bell focused on and promoted the magneto type of telephone, which is now only used as a receiver and isn't very suitable for the essential role of a speech transmitter. Starting in August 1877, the Western Union Telegraph Company pursued a different approach, and in 1878, in partnership with the Gold & Stock Telegraph Company, they established the American Speaking Telephone Company to launch the Edison apparatus and set up telephone exchanges across the nation. In this competition, having a reliable battery transmitter heavily favored Western Union, as the overall growth of the industry depended on it. However, within a few months, the Bell system also created its own battery transmitter, helping to level the playing field. Late in that same year, patent litigation began, which clearly highlighted Bell's merits through his patent as the original inventor of the electric speaking telephone; as a result, Western Union made an agreement with its competitor. A notable contract dated November 10, 1879, revealed that, under the Edison and other relevant patents, Western Union had already started around eighty-five exchanges and was producing large quantities of telephone equipment. In exchange for stepping back from the telephone business, Western Union negotiated a deal to receive a 20 percent royalty on all telephone earnings from the Bell system while the Bell patents were active, resulting in several hundred thousand dollars in annual income for several years, primarily based on their modest investment in Edison's work. They were also paid several thousand dollars in cash for the Edison, Phelps, Gray, and other equipment in stock. Additionally, they acquired 40 percent of the shares in the local telephone systems of New York and Chicago; and, perhaps most importantly, they secured an agreement from Bell's interests to stay out of the telegraph business.
By March, 1881, there were in the United States only nine cities of more than ten thousand inhabitants, and only one of more than fifteen thousand, without a telephone exchange. The industry thrived under competition, and the absence of it now had a decided effect in checking growth; for when the Bell patent expired in 1893, the total of telephone sets in operation in the United States was only 291,253. To quote from an official Bell statement:
By March 1881, there were only nine cities in the United States with more than ten thousand residents, and only one with more than fifteen thousand, that didn't have a telephone exchange. The industry thrived on competition, and the lack of it clearly limited growth; because when the Bell patent expired in 1893, there were only 291,253 telephone sets in use across the United States. To quote an official Bell statement:
"The brief but vigorous Western Union competition was a kind of blessing in disguise. The very fact that two distinct interests were actively engaged in the work of organizing and establishing competing telephone exchanges all over the country, greatly facilitated the spread of the idea and the growth of the business, and familiarized the people with the use of the telephone as a business agency; while the keenness of the competition, extending to the agents and employees of both companies, brought about a swift but quite unforeseen and unlooked-for expansion in the individual exchanges of the larger cities, and a corresponding advance in their importance, value, and usefulness."
The brief but intense competition from Western Union turned out to be a blessing in disguise. The fact that two different companies were actively working on setting up competing telephone exchanges across the country really helped spread the idea and grow the business, making people more familiar with using the telephone for business purposes. Meanwhile, the intensity of the competition, which affected the agents and employees of both companies, led to a rapid and unexpected expansion in the individual exchanges in larger cities, along with a notable increase in their significance, value, and utility.
The truth of this was immediately shown in 1894, after the Bell patents had expired, by the tremendous outburst of new competitive activity, in "independent" country systems and toll lines through sparsely settled districts—work for which the Edison apparatus and methods were peculiarly adapted, yet against which the influence of the Edison patent was invoked. The data secured by the United States Census Office in 1902 showed that the whole industry had made gigantic leaps in eight years, and had 2,371,044 telephone stations in service, of which 1,053,866 were wholly or nominally independent of the Bell. By 1907 an even more notable increase was shown, and the Census figures for that year included no fewer than 6,118,578 stations, of which 1,986,575 were "independent." These six million instruments every single set employing the principle of the carbon transmitter—were grouped into 15,527 public exchanges, in the very manner predicted by Bell thirty years before, and they gave service in the shape of over eleven billions of talks. The outstanding capitalized value of the plant was $814,616,004, the income for the year was nearly $185,000,000, and the people employed were 140,000. If Edison had done nothing else, his share in the creation of such an industry would have entitled him to a high place among inventors.
The truth of this became clear in 1894, after the Bell patents expired, when there was a huge surge in new competitive activity, with "independent" country systems and toll lines in sparsely populated areas—projects that the Edison equipment and methods were especially suited for, yet against which the Edison patent was enforced. Data from the United States Census Office in 1902 revealed that the entire industry had made significant progress in eight years, boasting 2,371,044 telephone stations in operation, with 1,053,866 being completely or nominally independent from Bell. By 1907, there was an even more remarkable increase, with the Census numbers for that year showing a total of 6,118,578 stations, of which 1,986,575 were "independent." These six million phones, all using the carbon transmitter principle, were connected through 15,527 public exchanges, just as Bell had predicted thirty years earlier, and they facilitated over eleven billion conversations. The total capital value of the infrastructure was $814,616,004, the annual income was nearly $185,000,000, and 140,000 people were employed. If Edison had done nothing else, his role in building such an industry would have earned him a prominent place among inventors.
This chapter is of necessity brief in its reference to many extremely interesting points and details; and to some readers it may seem incomplete in its references to the work of other men than Edison, whose influence on telephony as an art has also been considerable. In reply to this pertinent criticism, it may be pointed out that this is a life of Edison, and not of any one else; and that even the discussion of his achievements alone in these various fields requires more space than the authors have at their disposal. The attempt has been made, however, to indicate the course of events and deal fairly with the facts. The controversy that once waged with great excitement over the invention of the microphone, but has long since died away, is suggestive of the difficulties involved in trying to do justice to everybody. A standard history describes the microphone thus:
This chapter necessarily touches briefly on many fascinating points and details. Some readers might find it lacking when it comes to mentioning the contributions of others besides Edison, all of whom have also had a significant impact on telephony as an art. In response to this valid criticism, it should be noted that this is a biography of Edison, not anyone else, and even discussing his achievements alone in these various areas takes up more space than the authors have available. However, an effort has been made to outline the sequence of events and address the facts fairly. The once-heated debate over the invention of the microphone, which has long since faded, highlights the challenges of giving credit to everyone involved. A standard history describes the microphone this way:
"A form of apparatus produced during the early days of the telephone by Professor Hughes, of England, for the purpose of rendering faint, indistinct sounds distinctly audible, depended for its operation on the changes that result in the resistance of loose contacts. This apparatus was called the microphone, and was in reality but one of the many forms that it is possible to give to the telephone transmitter. For example, the Edison granular transmitter was a variety of microphone, as was also Edison's transmitter, in which the solid button of carbon was employed. Indeed, even the platinum point, which in the early form of the Reis transmitter pressed against the platinum contact cemented to the centre of the diaphragm, was a microphone."
A device created in the early days of the telephone by Professor Hughes from England was designed to make faint, unclear sounds clearly audible. Its operation relied on the changes in the resistance of loose contacts. This device was called the microphone, and it was just one of many variations that could be used with the telephone transmitter. For instance, the Edison granular transmitter was a type of microphone, as was Edison's transmitter, which used a solid carbon button. Even the platinum point in the early version of the Reis transmitter, which pressed against a platinum contact attached to the center of the diaphragm, was a microphone.
At a time when most people were amazed at the idea of hearing, with the aid of a "microphone," a fly walk at a distance of many miles, the priority of invention of such a device was hotly disputed. Yet without desiring to take anything from the credit of the brilliant American, Hughes, whose telegraphic apparatus is still in use all over Europe, it may be pointed out that this passage gives Edison the attribution of at least two original forms of which those suggested by Hughes were mere variations and modifications. With regard to this matter, Mr. Edison himself remarks: "After I sent one of my men over to London especially, to show Preece the carbon transmitter, and where Hughes first saw it, and heard it—then within a month he came out with the microphone, without any acknowledgment whatever. Published dates will show that Hughes came along after me."
At a time when most people were amazed at the idea of hearing, with the help of a "microphone," a fly walking from many miles away, the dispute over who invented such a device was intense. However, without taking away any credit from the brilliant American, Hughes, whose telegraphic device is still in use throughout Europe, it's worth noting that this passage gives Edison credit for at least two original versions of which Hughes's ideas were just variations and modifications. Regarding this issue, Mr. Edison himself remarks: "After I sent one of my men to London specifically to show Preece the carbon transmitter, where Hughes first saw it and heard it—then within a month he launched the microphone, without any acknowledgment whatsoever. Published dates will prove that Hughes came about after me."
There have been other ways also in which Edison has utilized the peculiar property that carbon possesses of altering its resistance to the passage of current, according to the pressure to which it is subjected, whether at the surface, or through closer union of the mass. A loose road with a few inches of dust or pebbles on it offers appreciable resistance to the wheels of vehicles travelling over it; but if the surface is kept hard and smooth the effect is quite different. In the same way carbon, whether solid or in the shape of finely divided powder, offers a high resistance to the passage of electricity; but if the carbon is squeezed together the conditions change, with less resistance to electricity in the circuit. For his quadruplex system, Mr. Edison utilized this fact in the construction of a rheostat or resistance box. It consists of a series of silk disks saturated with a sizing of plumbago and well dried. The disks are compressed by means of an adjustable screw; and in this manner the resistance of a circuit can be varied over a wide range.
Edison has found other ways to use the unique property of carbon, which changes its resistance to electrical current based on the pressure applied to it, whether on the surface or through a tighter compacting of the material. A loose road covered with a few inches of dust or pebbles provides noticeable resistance to vehicles driving over it, but if the surface is kept solid and smooth, the situation changes completely. Similarly, carbon, whether solid or in the form of fine powder, exhibits high resistance to the flow of electricity; however, if the carbon is compressed, the conditions shift, resulting in lower resistance in the electrical circuit. For his quadruplex system, Edison applied this principle in creating a rheostat or resistance box. It consists of a series of silk disks that are soaked with plumbago and thoroughly dried. The disks are pressed together using an adjustable screw, allowing the resistance in the circuit to be adjusted over a wide range.
In like manner Edison developed a "pressure" or carbon relay, adapted to the transference of signals of variable strength from one circuit to another. An ordinary relay consists of an electromagnet inserted in the main line for telegraphing, which brings a local battery and sounder circuit into play, reproducing in the local circuit the signals sent over the main line. The relay is adjusted to the weaker currents likely to be received, but the signals reproduced on the sounder by the agency of the relay are, of course, all of equal strength, as they depend upon the local battery, which has only this steady work to perform. In cases where it is desirable to reproduce the signals in the local circuit with the same variations in strength as they are received by the relay, the Edison carbon pressure relay does the work. The poles of the electromagnet in the local circuit are hollowed out and filled up with carbon disks or powdered plumbago. The armature and the carbon-tipped poles of the electromagnet form part of the local circuit; and if the relay is actuated by a weak current the armature will be attracted but feebly. The carbon being only slightly compressed will offer considerable resistance to the flow of current from the local battery, and therefore the signal on the local sounder will be weak. If, on the contrary, the incoming current on the main line be strong, the armature will be strongly attracted, the carbon will be sharply compressed, the resistance in the local circuit will be proportionately lowered, and the signal heard on the local sounder will be a loud one. Thus it will be seen, by another clever juggle with the willing agent, carbon, for which he has found so many duties, Edison is able to transfer or transmit exactly, to the local circuit, the main-line current in all its minutest variations.
In a similar way, Edison created a "pressure" or carbon relay designed to transfer signals of varying strength from one circuit to another. A standard relay consists of an electromagnet placed in the main telegraph line, which activates a local battery and sounder circuit, recreating the signals sent over the main line in the local circuit. The relay is tuned to respond to weaker currents, but the signals generated in the sounder by the relay are all of equal strength since they rely on the local battery, which only has this consistent job to do. When it’s necessary to reproduce signals in the local circuit with the same variations in strength as they are received by the relay, the Edison carbon pressure relay handles this. The poles of the electromagnet in the local circuit are shaped to hold carbon disks or powdered graphite. The armature and the carbon-tipped poles of the electromagnet are part of the local circuit; if the relay is activated by a weak current, the armature will be attracted, but only slightly. The carbon being only lightly compressed will resist the flow of current from the local battery significantly, so the signal on the local sounder will be weak. However, if the incoming current on the main line is strong, the armature will be strongly attracted, the carbon will be compressed tightly, the resistance in the local circuit will be lowered accordingly, and the signal heard on the local sounder will be loud. This shows that through another clever manipulation of the adaptable agent, carbon—which Edison has found numerous uses for—he can accurately transfer the main-line current with all its minute variations to the local circuit.
In his researches to determine the nature of the motograph phenomena, and to open up other sources of electrical current generation, Edison has worked out a very ingenious and somewhat perplexing piece of apparatus known as the "chalk battery." It consists of a series of chalk cylinders mounted on a shaft revolved by hand. Resting against each of these cylinders is a palladium-faced spring, and similar springs make contact with the shaft between each cylinder. By connecting all these springs in circuit with a galvanometer and revolving the shaft rapidly, a notable deflection is obtained of the galvanometer needle, indicating the production of electrical energy. The reason for this does not appear to have been determined.
In his research to understand the nature of motograph phenomena and explore other ways to generate electrical current, Edison developed a clever and somewhat confusing device known as the "chalk battery." It consists of a series of chalk cylinders mounted on a shaft that is turned by hand. Pressing against each of these cylinders is a spring with a palladium face, and similar springs make contact with the shaft between each cylinder. By connecting all these springs to a circuit with a galvanometer and spinning the shaft quickly, a significant deflection of the galvanometer needle is achieved, indicating the generation of electrical energy. The reason for this effect doesn't seem to have been determined.
Last but not least, in this beautiful and ingenious series, comes the "tasimeter," an instrument of most delicate sensibility in the presence of heat. The name is derived from the Greek, the use of the apparatus being primarily to measure extremely minute differences of pressure. A strip of hard rubber with pointed ends rests perpendicularly on a platinum plate, beneath which is a carbon button, under which again lies another platinum plate. The two plates and the carbon button form part of an electric circuit containing a battery and a galvanometer. The hard-rubber strip is exceedingly sensitive to heat. The slightest degree of heat imparted to it causes it to expand invisibly, thus increasing the pressure contact on the carbon button and producing a variation in the resistance of the circuit, registered immediately by the little swinging needle of the galvanometer. The instrument is so sensitive that with a delicate galvanometer it will show the impingement of the heat from a person's hand thirty feet away. The suggestion to employ such an apparatus in astronomical observations occurs at once, and it may be noted that in one instance the heat of rays of light from the remote star Arcturus gave results.
Last but not least, in this beautiful and clever series, we have the "tasimeter," an instrument with incredible sensitivity to heat. The name comes from Greek, and the device is mainly used to measure very tiny differences in pressure. A strip of hard rubber with pointed ends sits vertically on a platinum plate, with a carbon button beneath it, and another platinum plate underneath that. The two plates and the carbon button are part of an electric circuit that includes a battery and a galvanometer. The hard rubber strip is extremely responsive to heat. Even the slightest bit of heat makes it expand invisibly, which increases the pressure on the carbon button and changes the resistance in the circuit, instantly registered by the small swinging needle of the galvanometer. The instrument is so sensitive that with a fine galvanometer, it can detect the heat from a person's hand up to thirty feet away. It's easy to see the potential for using such a device in astronomical observations, and it’s worth noting that in one case, the heat from the light rays of the distant star Arcturus produced measurable results.
CHAPTER X
THE PHONOGRAPH
AT the opening of the Electrical Show in New York City in October, 1908, to celebrate the jubilee of the Atlantic Cable and the first quarter century of lighting with the Edison service on Manhattan Island, the exercises were all conducted by means of the Edison phonograph. This included the dedicatory speech of Governor Hughes, of New York; the modest remarks of Mr. Edison, as president; the congratulations of the presidents of several national electric bodies, and a number of vocal and instrumental selections of operatic nature. All this was heard clearly by a very large audience, and was repeated on other evenings. The same speeches were used again phonographically at the Electrical Show in Chicago in 1909—and now the records are preserved for reproduction a hundred or a thousand years hence. This tour de force, never attempted before, was merely an exemplification of the value of the phonograph not only in establishing at first hand the facts of history, but in preserving the human voice. What would we not give to listen to the very accents and tones of the Sermon on the Mount, the orations of Demosthenes, the first Pitt's appeal for American liberty, the Farewell of Washington, or the Address at Gettysburg? Until Edison made his wonderful invention in 1877, the human race was entirely without means for preserving or passing on to posterity its own linguistic utterances or any other vocal sound. We have some idea how the ancients looked and felt and wrote; the abundant evidence takes us back to the cave-dwellers. But all the old languages are dead, and the literary form is their embalmment. We do not even know definitely how Shakespeare's and Goldsmith's plays were pronounced on the stage in the theatres of the time; while it is only a guess that perhaps Chaucer would sound much more modern than he scans.
At the start of the Electrical Show in New York City in October 1908, celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Atlantic Cable and the first 25 years of electric lighting with Edison's service on Manhattan Island, everything was done using the Edison phonograph. This included the inaugural speech by Governor Hughes of New York, Edison’s modest remarks as president, congratulatory messages from various leaders of national electric organizations, and several vocal and instrumental performances of operatic music. The entire event was clearly heard by a large audience and was repeated on other evenings. The same speeches were phonographically recorded for the Electrical Show in Chicago in 1909, and now those records are preserved for playback a hundred or even a thousand years from now. This remarkable achievement, never done before, demonstrated the phonograph's value not just in capturing historical facts but in preserving the human voice. What wouldn’t we give to hear the exact accents and tones of the Sermon on the Mount, Demosthenes' speeches, the first Pitt’s call for American freedom, Washington's Farewell, or the Gettysburg Address? Before Edison’s amazing invention in 1877, humanity had no way to preserve or pass on its spoken words or any other vocal sounds to future generations. We have some understanding of how the ancients looked, felt, and wrote; there’s plenty of evidence that takes us back to cave dwellers. But all the ancient languages are dead, and their literary forms are like mummies. We don’t even know for sure how Shakespeare’s and Goldsmith’s plays were pronounced on stage in their time; it’s only a guess that Chaucer might sound much more modern than how it reads.
The analysis of sound, which owes so much to Helmholtz, was one step toward recording; and the various means of illustrating the phenomena of sound to the eye and ear, prior to the phonograph, were all ingenious. One can watch the dancing little flames of Koenig, and see a voice expressed in tongues of fire; but the record can only be photographic. In like manner, the simple phonautograph of Leon Scott, invented about 1858, records on a revolving cylinder of blackened paper the sound vibrations transmitted through a membrane to which a tiny stylus is attached; so that a human mouth uses a pen and inscribes its sign vocal. Yet after all we are just as far away as ever from enabling the young actors at Harvard to give Aristophanes with all the true, subtle intonation and inflection of the Athens of 400 B.C. The instrument is dumb. Ingenuity has been shown also in the invention of "talking-machines," like Faber's, based on the reed organ pipe. These automata can be made by dexterous manipulation to jabber a little, like a doll with its monotonous "ma-ma," or a cuckoo clock; but they lack even the sterile utility of the imitative art of ventriloquism. The real great invention lies in creating devices that shall be able to evoke from tinfoil, wax, or composition at any time to-day or in the future the sound that once was as evanescent as the vibrations it made on the air.
The study of sound, heavily influenced by Helmholtz, was a step towards recording; and the various ways to visually and auditorily represent sound phenomena before the phonograph were quite clever. You can observe the flickering flames of Koenig and see a voice represented in tongues of fire; however, the record can only be visual. Similarly, the simple phonautograph by Leon Scott, invented around 1858, records sound vibrations on a spinning cylinder of blackened paper via a membrane connected to a tiny stylus, making a human voice write its vocal signature. Yet, we are still as far away as ever from allowing young actors at Harvard to perform Aristophanes with the true, subtle intonations and inflections of Athens in 400 B.C. The instrument is silent. There has also been cleverness in creating "talking machines," like Faber's, which are based on the reed organ pipe. These automata can be skillfully manipulated to mumble a bit, like a doll repeating "ma-ma," or a cuckoo clock; but they lack even the limited usefulness of ventriloquism. The real breakthrough lies in developing devices that can bring forth from tinfoil, wax, or other materials at any time today or in the future the sounds that once were as fleeting as the vibrations they created in the air.
Contrary to the general notion, very few of the great modern inventions have been the result of a sudden inspiration by which, Minerva-like, they have sprung full-fledged from their creators' brain; but, on the contrary, they have been evolved by slow and gradual steps, so that frequently the final advance has been often almost imperceptible. The Edison phonograph is an important exception to the general rule; not, of course, the phonograph of the present day with all of its mechanical perfection, but as an instrument capable of recording and reproducing sound. Its invention has been frequently attributed to the discovery that a point attached to a telephone diaphragm would, under the effect of sound-waves, vibrate with sufficient force to prick the finger. The story, though interesting, is not founded on fact; but, if true, it is difficult to see how the discovery in question could have contributed materially to the ultimate accomplishment. To a man of Edison's perception it is absurd to suppose that the effect of the so-called discovery would not have been made as a matter of deduction long before the physical sensation was experienced. As a matter of fact, the invention of the phonograph was the result of pure reason. Some time prior to 1877, Edison had been experimenting on an automatic telegraph in which the letters were formed by embossing strips of paper with the proper arrangement of dots and dashes. By drawing this strip beneath a contact lever, the latter was actuated so as to control the circuits and send the desired signals over the line. It was observed that when the strip was moved very rapidly the vibration of the lever resulted in the production of an audible note. With these facts before him, Edison reasoned that if the paper strip could be imprinted with elevations and depressions representative of sound-waves, they might be caused to actuate a diaphragm so as to reproduce the corresponding sounds. The next step in the line of development was to form the necessary undulations on the strip, and it was then reasoned that original sounds themselves might be utilized to form a graphic record by actuating a diaphragm and causing a cutting or indenting point carried thereby to vibrate in contact with a moving surface, so as to cut or indent the record therein. Strange as it may seem, therefore, and contrary to the general belief, the phonograph was developed backward, the production of the sounds being of prior development to the idea of actually recording them.
Contrary to popular belief, very few of the great modern inventions have come from sudden inspiration, like Minerva springing fully formed from a creator's mind. Instead, they have developed through slow and gradual steps, often making the final advance nearly imperceptible. The Edison phonograph is a notable exception; not the modern version with all its mechanical perfection, but as a device that could record and reproduce sound. Its invention is often linked to the idea that a point attached to a telephone diaphragm would vibrate forcefully enough to prick a finger when affected by sound waves. While this story is intriguing, it isn't based in fact; even if it were true, it’s hard to see how it could have significantly contributed to the final invention. For someone with Edison's insight, it's unreasonable to think the effect of this so-called discovery wouldn’t have been deduced long before experiencing the physical sensation. In reality, the phonograph's invention arose from pure reasoning. Some time before 1877, Edison was experimenting with an automatic telegraph, using strips of paper embossed with dots and dashes. By pulling this strip under a contact lever, the lever was activated to control circuits and send signals. It was noted that when the strip moved quickly, the lever's vibrations produced an audible sound. Given this, Edison concluded that if paper strips could be imprinted with elevations and depressions representing sound waves, these could be used to actuate a diaphragm, reproducing the matching sounds. The next step was to create the necessary undulations on the strip, leading to the idea that actual sounds could be recorded graphically by using a diaphragm to vibrate a cutting or indenting point against a moving surface, cutting or indenting the record. Interestingly, and contrary to common belief, the phonograph was developed in reverse; the ability to produce sounds came before the idea of recording them.
Mr. Edison's own account of the invention of the phonograph is intensely interesting. "I was experimenting," he says, "on an automatic method of recording telegraph messages on a disk of paper laid on a revolving platen, exactly the same as the disk talking-machine of to-day. The platen had a spiral groove on its surface, like the disk. Over this was placed a circular disk of paper; an electromagnet with the embossing point connected to an arm travelled over the disk; and any signals given through the magnets were embossed on the disk of paper. If this disk was removed from the machine and put on a similar machine provided with a contact point, the embossed record would cause the signals to be repeated into another wire. The ordinary speed of telegraphic signals is thirty-five to forty words a minute; but with this machine several hundred words were possible.
Mr. Edison's own account of inventing the phonograph is really fascinating. "I was experimenting," he says, "with an automatic way to record telegraph messages on a paper disk placed on a spinning platen, just like today’s talking machines. The platen had a spiral groove on its surface, similar to the disk. On top of this was a circular paper disk; an electromagnet with a stylus connected to an arm moved over the disk; and any signals sent through the magnets were imprinted on the paper disk. If you took this disk off the machine and put it on another machine with a contact point, the imprinted record would reproduce the signals on another wire. The typical speed of telegraph signals is thirty-five to forty words a minute, but with this machine, several hundred words were achievable."
"From my experiments on the telephone I knew of the power of a diaphragm to take up sound vibrations, as I had made a little toy which, when you recited loudly in the funnel, would work a pawl connected to the diaphragm; and this engaging a ratchet-wheel served to give continuous rotation to a pulley. This pulley was connected by a cord to a little paper toy representing a man sawing wood. Hence, if one shouted: 'Mary had a little lamb,' etc., the paper man would start sawing wood. I reached the conclusion that if I could record the movements of the diaphragm properly, I could cause such record to reproduce the original movements imparted to the diaphragm by the voice, and thus succeed in recording and reproducing the human voice.
"From my experiments with the telephone, I realized how effective a diaphragm is at picking up sound vibrations. I had made a little toy that, when you spoke loudly into the funnel, would activate a pawl attached to the diaphragm. This in turn engaged a ratchet-wheel, which provided continuous rotation to a pulley. This pulley was connected by a cord to a small paper toy that showed a man sawing wood. So, when someone shouted, 'Mary had a little lamb,' the paper man would start sawing. I concluded that if I could properly record the movements of the diaphragm, I could make that recording reproduce the original movements created by the voice, thus allowing me to record and playback the human voice."
"Instead of using a disk I designed a little machine using a cylinder provided with grooves around the surface. Over this was to be placed tinfoil, which easily received and recorded the movements of the diaphragm. A sketch was made, and the piece-work price, $18, was marked on the sketch. I was in the habit of marking the price I would pay on each sketch. If the workman lost, I would pay his regular wages; if he made more than the wages, he kept it. The workman who got the sketch was John Kruesi. I didn't have much faith that it would work, expecting that I might possibly hear a word or so that would give hope of a future for the idea. Kruesi, when he had nearly finished it, asked what it was for. I told him I was going to record talking, and then have the machine talk back. He thought it absurd. However, it was finished, the foil was put on; I then shouted 'Mary had a little lamb,' etc. I adjusted the reproducer, and the machine reproduced it perfectly. I was never so taken aback in my life. Everybody was astonished. I was always afraid of things that worked the first time. Long experience proved that there were great drawbacks found generally before they could be got commercial; but here was something there was no doubt of."
"Instead of using a disk, I designed a small machine that used a cylinder with grooves around its surface. On top of this, I planned to put tinfoil, which would easily capture and record the movements of the diaphragm. I made a sketch and noted the piece-work price, $18, on it. I usually marked the price I would pay on each sketch. If the worker lost, I would pay his regular wages; if he earned more than that, he kept the extra. The worker who got the sketch was John Kruesi. I didn't have much faith that it would work, thinking I might just hear a word or two that could give hope for the idea's future. When Kruesi was almost done, he asked what it was for. I told him I planned to record speech and then have the machine talk back. He thought it was ridiculous. However, it was completed, the foil was applied; I then shouted, 'Mary had a little lamb,' etc. I adjusted the reproducer, and the machine replicated it perfectly. I was completely shocked. Everyone was amazed. I always worried about things that worked the first time. My long experience had shown that there were usually significant drawbacks before something could be commercialized; but here was something that was undoubtedly impressive."
No wonder that honest John Kruesi, as he stood and listened to the marvellous performance of the simple little machine he had himself just finished, ejaculated in an awe-stricken tone: "Mein Gott im Himmel!" And yet he had already seen Edison do a few clever things. No wonder they sat up all night fixing and adjusting it so as to get better and better results—reciting and singing, trying each other's voices, and then listening with involuntary awe as the words came back again and again, just as long as they were willing to revolve the little cylinder with its dotted spiral indentations in the tinfoil under the vibrating stylus of the reproducing diaphragm. It took a little time to acquire the knack of turning the crank steadily while leaning over the recorder to talk into the machine; and there was some deftness required also in fastening down the tinfoil on the cylinder where it was held by a pin running in a longitudinal slot. Paraffined paper appears also to have been experimented with as an impressible material. It is said that Carman, the foreman of the machine shop, had gone the length of wagering Edison a box of cigars that the device would not work. All the world knows that he lost.
It's no surprise that honest John Kruesi, as he stood and listened to the amazing performance of the simple little machine he had just finished, exclaimed in awe, "My God in heaven!" Still, he had already seen Edison pull off some impressive feats. It's no wonder they stayed up all night fixing and adjusting it to get better results—reciting and singing, trying out each other's voices, and then listening in amazement as the words echoed back over and over, as long as they kept turning the little cylinder with its dotted spiral grooves under the vibrating stylus of the reproducing diaphragm. It took a bit of practice to get the hang of turning the crank steadily while leaning over the recorder to talk into the machine; there was also some skill needed in securing the tinfoil on the cylinder where it was held by a pin running through a long slot. Paraffined paper was apparently experimented with as well as an impressionable material. It's said that Carman, the foreman of the machine shop, went so far as to bet Edison a box of cigars that the device wouldn't work. Everyone knows he lost that bet.
The original Edison phonograph thus built by Kruesi is preserved in the South Kensington Museum, London. That repository can certainly have no greater treasure of its kind. But as to its immediate use, the inventor says: "That morning I took it over to New York and walked into the office of the Scientific American, went up to Mr. Beach's desk, and said I had something to show him. He asked what it was. I told him I had a machine that would record and reproduce the human voice. I opened the package, set up the machine and recited, 'Mary had a little lamb,' etc. Then I reproduced it so that it could be heard all over the room. They kept me at it until the crowd got so great Mr. Beach was afraid the floor would collapse; and we were compelled to stop. The papers next morning contained columns. None of the writers seemed to understand how it was done. I tried to explain, it was so very simple, but the results were so surprising they made up their minds probably that they never would understand it—and they didn't.
The original Edison phonograph built by Kruesi is on display at the South Kensington Museum in London. That collection surely has no greater treasure of its kind. As for its immediate use, the inventor recalls: "That morning I took it to New York and walked into the office of the Scientific American. I went up to Mr. Beach's desk and said I had something to show him. He asked what it was. I told him I had a machine that could record and play back the human voice. I opened the package, set up the machine, and recited, 'Mary had a little lamb,' and so on. Then I played it back so everyone could hear it in the room. They kept me at it until the crowd got so large that Mr. Beach was worried the floor might collapse, and we had to stop. The next morning's papers had pages of coverage. None of the writers seemed to understand how it worked. I tried to explain—it was really very simple—but the results were so surprising that they probably decided they would never understand it—and they didn’t."
"I started immediately making several larger and better machines, which I exhibited at Menlo Park to crowds. The Pennsylvania Railroad ran special trains. Washington people telegraphed me to come on. I took a phonograph to Washington and exhibited it in the room of James G. Blaine's niece (Gail Hamilton); and members of Congress and notable people of that city came all day long until late in the evening. I made one break. I recited 'Mary,' etc., and another ditty:
"I immediately started building several larger and better machines, which I showcased at Menlo Park to huge crowds. The Pennsylvania Railroad even ran special trains. People in Washington sent me telegrams asking me to come. I took a phonograph to Washington and demonstrated it in the room of James G. Blaine's niece, Gail Hamilton; members of Congress and prominent figures from the city visited all day long until late in the evening. I had one moment where I recited 'Mary,' among other songs:"
'There was a little girl, who had a little curl Right in the middle of her forehead; And when she was good she was very, very good, But when she was bad she was horrid.'
'There was a little girl who had a tiny curl Right in the middle of her forehead; And when she was good, she was really, really good, But when she was bad, she was terrible.'
"It will be remembered that Senator Roscoe Conkling, then very prominent, had a curl of hair on his forehead; and all the caricaturists developed it abnormally. He was very sensitive about the subject. When he came in he was introduced; but being rather deaf, I didn't catch his name, but sat down and started the curl ditty. Everybody tittered, and I was told that Mr. Conkling was displeased. About 11 o'clock at night word was received from President Hayes that he would be very much pleased if I would come up to the White House. I was taken there, and found Mr. Hayes and several others waiting. Among them I remember Carl Schurz, who was playing the piano when I entered the room. The exhibition continued till about 12.30 A.M., when Mrs. Hayes and several other ladies, who had been induced to get up and dress, appeared. I left at 3.30 A.M.
It will be remembered that Senator Roscoe Conkling, who was quite prominent at the time, had a curl of hair on his forehead, and all the caricaturists exaggerated it. He was very sensitive about it. When he arrived, he was introduced; but since I was a bit hard of hearing, I didn’t catch his name and sat down to start the curl song. Everyone giggled, and I was told that Mr. Conkling was not pleased. Around 11 o'clock at night, I got a message from President Hayes saying he would be very happy if I could come up to the White House. I was taken there and found Mr. Hayes and a few others waiting. Among them, I remember Carl Schurz, who was playing the piano when I walked into the room. The gathering lasted until about 12:30 A.M., when Mrs. Hayes and several other ladies, who had been persuaded to get up and dress, showed up. I left at 3:30 A.M.
"For a long time some people thought there was trickery. One morning at Menlo Park a gentleman came to the laboratory and asked to see the phonograph. It was Bishop Vincent, who helped Lewis Miller found the Chautauqua I exhibited it, and then he asked if he could speak a few words. I put on a fresh foil and told him to go ahead. He commenced to recite Biblical names with immense rapidity. On reproducing it he said: 'I am satisfied, now. There isn't a man in the United States who could recite those names with the same rapidity.'"
"For a long time, some people suspected there was some kind of trick. One morning at Menlo Park, a gentleman came to the lab and asked to see the phonograph. It was Bishop Vincent, who helped Lewis Miller start the Chautauqua. I showed it to him, and then he asked if he could say a few words. I put on a fresh foil and told him to go ahead. He began to recite Biblical names at an incredible speed. When it was played back, he said, 'I'm satisfied now. There isn't a man in the United States who could recite those names with the same speed.'"
The phonograph was now fairly launched as a world sensation, and a reference to the newspapers of 1878 will show the extent to which it and Edison were themes of universal discussion. Some of the press notices of the period were most amazing—and amusing. As though the real achievements of this young man, barely thirty, were not tangible and solid enough to justify admiration of his genius, the "yellow journalists" of the period began busily to create an "Edison myth," with gross absurdities of assertion and attribution from which the modest subject of it all has not yet ceased to suffer with unthinking people. A brilliantly vicious example of this method of treatment is to be found in the Paris Figaro of that year, which under the appropriate title of "This Astounding Eddison" lay bare before the French public the most startling revelations as to the inventor's life and character. "It should be understood," said this journal, "that Mr. Eddison does not belong to himself. He is the property of the telegraph company which lodges him in New York at a superb hotel; keeps him on a luxurious footing, and pays him a formidable salary so as to be the one to know of and profit by his discoveries. The company has, in the dwelling of Eddison, men in its employ who do not quit him for a moment, at the table, on the street, in the laboratory. So that this wretched man, watched more closely than ever was any malefactor, cannot even give a moment's thought to his own private affairs without one of his guards asking him what he is thinking about." This foolish "blague" was accompanied by a description of Edison's new "aerophone," a steam machine which carried the voice a distance of one and a half miles. "You speak to a jet of vapor. A friend previously advised can answer you by the same method." Nor were American journals backward in this wild exaggeration.
The phonograph had become a global sensation, and a look at the newspapers from 1878 reveals just how much it and Edison were the talk of the town. Some of the press coverage from that time was truly amazing—and entertaining. As if the real accomplishments of this young man, still in his thirties, weren’t impressive enough to earn admiration, the sensationalist reporters of the day started to create an "Edison myth," filled with outrageous claims and attributions that the humble subject of this fuss has yet to escape from among the clueless. A striking example of this treatment was published in the Paris Figaro that year, under the headline "This Astounding Eddison," exposing what it claimed were shocking revelations about the inventor's life and character. "It should be understood," the journal stated, "that Mr. Eddison does not belong to himself. He is owned by the telegraph company that puts him up in a luxury hotel in New York, maintains him in style, and pays him a hefty salary so they can be the first to know about and benefit from his discoveries. The company has people in Eddison's home who never leave his side—at the table, on the street, in the lab. So this poor man, watched more closely than any criminal, can’t even take a moment to think about his own private matters without one of his guards asking him what’s on his mind." This ridiculous story was paired with a description of Edison's new "aerophone," a steam machine that could carry a voice up to one and a half miles. "You speak to a jet of vapor. A friend who has been tipped off can answer you the same way." American newspapers were also quick to join in on this wild exaggeration.
The furor had its effect in stimulating a desire everywhere on the part of everybody to see and hear the phonograph. A small commercial organization was formed to build and exploit the apparatus, and the shops at Menlo Park laboratory were assisted by the little Bergmann shop in New York. Offices were taken for the new enterprise at 203 Broadway, where the Mail and Express building now stands, and where, in a general way, under the auspices of a talented dwarf, C. A. Cheever, the embryonic phonograph and the crude telephone shared rooms and expenses. Gardiner G. Hubbard, father-in-law of Alex. Graham Bell, was one of the stockholders in the Phonograph Company, which paid Edison $10,000 cash and a 20 per cent. royalty. This curious partnership was maintained for some time, even when the Bell Telephone offices were removed to Reade Street, New York, whither the phonograph went also; and was perhaps explained by the fact that just then the ability of the phonograph as a money-maker was much more easily demonstrated than was that of the telephone, still in its short range magneto stage and awaiting development with the aid of the carbon transmitter.
The excitement created a strong desire for everyone to see and hear the phonograph. A small company was set up to develop and promote the device, with support from the Bergmann shop in New York alongside the Menlo Park laboratory. They established offices at 203 Broadway, where the Mail and Express building is now located, and there, under the guidance of a talented individual named C. A. Cheever, the early phonograph and the basic telephone shared space and costs. Gardiner G. Hubbard, who was Alex Graham Bell's father-in-law, was one of the shareholders in the Phonograph Company, which paid Edison $10,000 in cash and a 20 percent royalty. This unusual partnership lasted for a while, even after the Bell Telephone offices moved to Reade Street in New York, where the phonograph relocated as well. This partnership could be explained by the fact that the phonograph's potential to generate profit was much clearer at that time compared to the telephone, which was still in its early development stages, relying on magneto technology and waiting for advancements like the carbon transmitter.
The earning capacity of the phonograph then, as largely now, lay in its exhibition qualities. The royalties from Boston, ever intellectually awake and ready for something new, ran as high as $1800 a week. In New York there was a ceaseless demand for it, and with the aid of Hilbourne L. Roosevelt, a famous organ builder, and uncle of ex-President Roosevelt, concerts were given at which the phonograph was "featured." To manage this novel show business the services of James Redpath were called into requisition with great success. Redpath, famous as a friend and biographer of John Brown, as a Civil War correspondent, and as founder of the celebrated Redpath Lyceum Bureau in Boston, divided the country into territories, each section being leased for exhibition purposes on a basis of a percentage of the "gate money." To 203 Broadway from all over the Union flocked a swarm of showmen, cranks, and particularly of old operators, who, the seedier they were in appearance, the more insistent they were that "Tom" should give them, for the sake of "Auld lang syne," this chance to make a fortune for him and for themselves. At the top of the building was a floor on which these novices were graduated in the use and care of the machine, and then, with an equipment of tinfoil and other supplies, they were sent out on the road. It was a diverting experience while it lasted. The excitement over the phonograph was maintained for many months, until a large proportion of the inhabitants of the country had seen it; and then the show receipts declined and dwindled away. Many of the old operators, taken on out of good-nature, were poor exhibitors and worse accountants, and at last they and the machines with which they had been intrusted faded from sight. But in the mean time Edison had learned many lessons as to this practical side of development that were not forgotten when the renascence of the phonograph began a few years later, leading up to the present enormous and steady demand for both machines and records.
The earning potential of the phonograph, just like now, focused heavily on its ability to put on a show. In Boston, always alert and eager for something new, royalties peaked at $1,800 a week. New York had a constant demand for it, and with help from Hilbourne L. Roosevelt—a well-known organ builder and uncle of the former president—concerts featuring the phonograph were held. To successfully run this new entertainment venture, James Redpath's expertise was enlisted. Redpath, known for being a friend and biographer of John Brown, a Civil War correspondent, and founder of the prominent Redpath Lyceum Bureau in Boston, divided the country into territories, leasing each section for exhibition on a percentage of ticket sales. At 203 Broadway, showmen, enthusiasts, and especially experienced operators flocked in from all over, and the more ragged they looked, the more they insisted that "Tom" should give them a chance to earn a fortune for both him and themselves, in the spirit of "Auld lang syne." At the top of the building, novice operators trained in the use and maintenance of the machine, and once equipped with tinfoil and supplies, they hit the road. It was an entertaining experience while it lasted. Excitement around the phonograph continued for many months, until a large part of the country had seen it; then ticket sales fell off and dwindled. Many of the seasoned operators, hired out of goodwill, turned out to be poor performers and even worse at handling finances, and eventually, they and the machines they were given faded from view. However, in the meantime, Edison learned valuable lessons about the practical aspects of development that he didn't forget when the phonograph made a comeback a few years later, leading to today's massive and consistent demand for both machines and records.
It deserves to be pointed out that the phonograph has changed little in the intervening years from the first crude instruments of 1877-78. It has simply been refined and made more perfect in a mechanical sense. Edison was immensely impressed with its possibilities, and greatly inclined to work upon it, but the coming of the electric light compelled him to throw all his energies for a time into the vast new field awaiting conquest. The original phonograph, as briefly noted above, was rotated by hand, and the cylinder was fed slowly longitudinally by means of a nut engaging a screw thread on the cylinder shaft. Wrapped around the cylinder was a sheet of tinfoil, with which engaged a small chisel-like recording needle, connected adhesively with the centre of an iron diaphragm. Obviously, as the cylinder was turned, the needle followed a spiral path whose pitch depended upon that of the feed screw. Along this path a thread was cut in the cylinder so as to permit the needle to indent the foil readily as the diaphragm vibrated. By rotating the cylinder and by causing the diaphragm to vibrate under the effect of vocal or musical sounds, the needle-like point would form a series of indentations in the foil corresponding to and characteristic of the sound-waves. By now engaging the point with the beginning of the grooved record so formed, and by again rotating the cylinder, the undulations of the record would cause the needle and its attached diaphragm to vibrate so as to effect the reproduction. Such an apparatus was necessarily undeveloped, and was interesting only from a scientific point of view. It had many mechanical defects which prevented its use as a practical apparatus. Since the cylinder was rotated by hand, the speed at which the record was formed would vary considerably, even with the same manipulator, so that it would have been impossible to record and reproduce music satisfactorily; in doing which exact uniformity of speed is essential. The formation of the record in tinfoil was also objectionable from a practical standpoint, since such a record was faint and would be substantially obliterated after two or three reproductions. Furthermore, the foil could not be easily removed from and replaced upon the instrument, and consequently the reproduction had to follow the recording immediately, and the successive tinfoils were thrown away. The instrument was also heavy and bulky. Notwithstanding these objections the original phonograph created, as already remarked, an enormous popular excitement, and the exhibitions were considered by many sceptical persons as nothing more than clever ventriloquism. The possibilities of the instrument as a commercial apparatus were recognized from the very first, and some of the fields in which it was predicted that the phonograph would be used are now fully occupied. Some have not yet been realized. Writing in 1878 in the North American-Review, Mr. Edison thus summed up his own ideas as to the future applications of the new invention:
It’s worth noting that the phonograph hasn’t changed much since the early models from 1877-78. It has just been improved and perfected mechanically. Edison was really impressed with its potential and was eager to work on it, but the arrival of electric light made him focus all his energy on that exciting new field for a while. The original phonograph, as mentioned earlier, was hand-cranked, and the cylinder was moved slowly along its length using a nut that engaged with a screw thread on the cylinder shaft. A sheet of tinfoil was wrapped around the cylinder, which was engaged by a small chisel-like recording needle connected to an iron diaphragm. As the cylinder turned, the needle traced a spiral path, the tightness of which depended on the feed screw. This path cut a thread in the cylinder, allowing the needle to easily indent the foil as the diaphragm vibrated. By rotating the cylinder and allowing the diaphragm to vibrate due to vocal or musical sounds, the needle would create a series of indentations in the foil that matched the sound waves. By aligning the needle with the start of the grooved record and rotating the cylinder again, the undulations of the record would cause the needle and diaphragm to vibrate, reproducing the sound. However, this device was underdeveloped and was mainly interesting from a scientific perspective. It had many mechanical flaws that made it impractical. Since the cylinder was turned by hand, the speed at which the records were made would vary a lot, even with the same person using it, so recording and reproducing music accurately would have been impossible, as consistent speed is crucial for that. The tinfoil records were also a problem because they were faint and would be pretty much erased after just two or three plays. Additionally, the foil couldn’t be easily taken off and replaced on the device, meaning that reproduction had to happen immediately after recording, and the used tinfoils were just discarded. The instrument was also heavy and cumbersome. Despite these drawbacks, the original phonograph generated a huge amount of public excitement, and many skeptics saw the demonstrations as clever tricks. The commercial potential of the device was recognized right from the start, and some of the uses that were predicted for the phonograph are now fully realized, while others are yet to be achieved. In 1878, Mr. Edison wrote in the North American Review to summarize his thoughts on the future applications of the new invention:
"Among the many uses to which the phonograph will be applied are the following:
"Here are some of the many ways the phonograph will be used:"
1. Letter writing and all kinds of dictation without the aid of a stenographer.
1. Writing letters and all types of dictation without the help of a stenographer.
2. Phonographic books, which will speak to blind people without effort on their part.
2. Phonographic books that will read aloud to blind people without any effort needed on their part.
3. The teaching of elocution.
3. Speaking skills training.
4. Reproduction of music.
Music reproduction.
5. The 'Family Record'—a registry of sayings, reminiscences, etc., by members of a family in their own voices, and of the last words of dying persons.
5. The 'Family Record'—a collection of quotes, memories, etc., from family members in their own words, and the final words of those who are dying.
6. Music-boxes and toys.
Music boxes and toys.
7. Clocks that should announce in articulate speech the time for going home, going to meals, etc.
7. Clocks that should clearly announce the time for heading home, going to meals, etc.
8. The preservation of languages by exact reproduction of the manner of pronouncing.
8. The preservation of languages through precise reproduction of pronunciation.
9. Educational purposes; such as preserving the explanations made by a teacher, so that the pupil can refer to them at any moment, and spelling or other lessons placed upon the phonograph for convenience in committing to memory.
9. Educational purposes, such as keeping a record of explanations provided by a teacher, so that the student can refer to them anytime, and lessons like spelling recorded on the phonograph for easy memorization.
10. Connection with the telephone, so as to make that instrument an auxiliary in the transmission of permanent and invaluable records, instead of being the recipient of momentary and fleeting communication."
10. Connecting with the telephone, so that this device can serve as a tool for transmitting lasting and valuable records, rather than just being a means for temporary and fleeting communication."
Of the above fields of usefulness in which it was expected that the phonograph might be applied, only three have been commercially realized—namely, the reproduction of musical, including vaudeville or talking selections, for which purpose a very large proportion of the phonographs now made is used; the employment of the machine as a mechanical stenographer, which field has been taken up actively only within the past few years; and the utilization of the device for the teaching of languages, for which purpose it has been successfully employed, for example, by the International Correspondence Schools of Scranton, Pennsylvania, for several years. The other uses, however, which were early predicted for the phonograph have not as yet been worked out practically, although the time seems not far distant when its general utility will be widely enlarged. Both dolls and clocks have been made, but thus far the world has not taken them seriously.
Of the possible applications for the phonograph that were anticipated, only three have been successfully developed commercially—specifically, the playback of music, including vaudeville and spoken performances, which accounts for a significant portion of the phonographs currently produced; the use of the machine as a mechanical stenographer, a field that's only gained traction in the last few years; and the application of the device in language teaching, which has been effectively utilized by the International Correspondence Schools of Scranton, Pennsylvania, for several years. However, other uses that were initially envisioned for the phonograph haven't yet been practically developed, though it seems that the time is soon coming when its overall utility will expand significantly. Dolls and clocks have been created, but so far, the world hasn't taken them seriously.
The original phonograph, as invented by Edison, remained in its crude and immature state for almost ten years—still the object of philosophical interest, and as a convenient text-book illustration of the effect of sound vibration. It continued to be a theme of curious interest to the imaginative, and the subject of much fiction, while its neglected commercial possibilities were still more or less vaguely referred to. During this period of arrested development, Edison was continuously working on the invention and commercial exploitation of the incandescent lamp. In 1887 his time was comparatively free, and the phonograph was then taken up with renewed energy, and the effort made to overcome its mechanical defects and to furnish a commercial instrument, so that its early promise might be realized. The important changes made from that time up to 1890 converted the phonograph from a scientific toy into a successful industrial apparatus. The idea of forming the record on tinfoil had been early abandoned, and in its stead was substituted a cylinder of wax-like material, in which the record was cut by a minute chisel-like gouging tool. Such a record or phonogram, as it was then called, could be removed from the machine or replaced at any time, many reproductions could be obtained without wearing out the record, and whenever desired the record could be shaved off by a turning-tool so as to present a fresh surface on which a new record could be formed, something like an ancient palimpsest. A wax cylinder having walls less than one-quarter of an inch in thickness could be used for receiving a large number of records, since the maximum depth of the record groove is hardly ever greater than one one-thousandth of an inch. Later on, and as the crowning achievement in the phonograph field, from a commercial point of view, came the duplication of records to the extent of many thousands from a single "master." This work was actively developed between the years 1890 and 1898, and its difficulties may be appreciated when the problem is stated; the copying from a single master of many millions of excessively minute sound-waves having a maximum width of one hundredth of an inch, and a maximum depth of one thousandth of an inch, or less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue-paper. Among the interesting developments of this process was the coating of the original or master record with a homogeneous film of gold so thin that three hundred thousand of these piled one on top of the other would present a thickness of only one inch!
The original phonograph, invented by Edison, stayed in its basic and underdeveloped form for almost ten years—it was still a topic of philosophical interest and a handy textbook example of sound vibration effects. It continued to fascinate the imaginative, becoming a subject of various fictional works, while its overlooked commercial potential was discussed only vaguely. During this stagnant period, Edison focused on inventing and commercially developing the incandescent lamp. In 1887, when he had more free time, he reinvigorated the phonograph project, working hard to fix its mechanical issues and create a commercially viable device, aiming to unlock its early potential. The significant changes made up until 1890 transformed the phonograph from a scientific toy into a successful industrial tool. The initial idea of using tinfoil for recording was quickly discarded in favor of a wax-like cylinder, where a tiny chisel-like tool cut the record. This phonogram could be easily removed or replaced, allowing for multiple reproductions without damaging the original. Whenever needed, the record could be resurfaced with a turning tool to create a fresh layer for new recordings, similar to an ancient palimpsest. A wax cylinder less than a quarter-inch thick could hold many records since the deepest groove hardly exceeded one one-thousandth of an inch. Later, as a significant breakthrough in the phonograph industry, came the ability to duplicate records, producing thousands from a single "master." This development flourished between 1890 and 1898, and its complexity can be understood when considering that it involved copying countless tiny sound waves from one master record, with each wave measuring a maximum width of one hundredth of an inch and a maximum depth of one thousandth of an inch, even thinner than a tissue paper. Among the notable advancements in this process was the application of an ultra-thin, uniform layer of gold on the master record, so thin that stacking three hundred thousand layers would only reach a thickness of one inch!
Another important change was in the nature of a reversal of the original arrangement, the cylinder or mandrel carrying the record being mounted in fixed bearings, and the recording or reproducing device being fed lengthwise, like the cutting-tool of a lathe, as the blank or record was rotated. It was early recognized that a single needle for forming the record and the reproduction therefrom was an undesirable arrangement, since the formation of the record required a very sharp cutting-tool, while satisfactory and repeated reproduction suggested the use of a stylus which would result in the minimum wear. After many experiments and the production of a number of types of machines, the present recorders and reproducers were evolved, the former consisting of a very small cylindrical gouging tool having a diameter of about forty thousandths of an inch, and the latter a ball or button-shaped stylus with a diameter of about thirty-five thousandths of an inch. By using an incisor of this sort, the record is formed of a series of connected gouges with rounded sides, varying in depth and width, and with which the reproducer automatically engages and maintains its engagement. Another difficulty encountered in the commercial development of the phonograph was the adjustment of the recording stylus so as to enter the wax-like surface to a very slight depth, and of the reproducer so as to engage exactly the record when formed. The earlier types of machines were provided with separate screws for effecting these adjustments; but considerable skill was required to obtain good results, and great difficulty was experienced in meeting the variations in the wax-like cylinders, due to the warping under atmospheric changes. Consequently, with the early types of commercial phonographs, it was first necessary to shave off the blank accurately before a record was formed thereon, in order that an absolutely true surface might be presented. To overcome these troubles, the very ingenious suggestion was then made and adopted, of connecting the recording and reproducing styluses to their respective diaphragms through the instrumentality of a compensating weight, which acted practically as a fixed support under the very rapid sound vibrations, but which yielded readily to distortions or variations in the wax-like cylinders. By reason of this improvement, it became possible to do away with all adjustments, the mass of the compensating weight causing the recorder to engage the blank automatically to the required depth, and to maintain the reproducing stylus always with the desired pressure on the record when formed. These automatic adjustments were maintained even though the blank or record might be so much out of true as an eighth of an inch, equal to more than two hundred times the maximum depth of the record groove.
Another significant change was the reversal of the original setup, with the cylinder or mandrel that holds the record now mounted in fixed bearings, while the recording or reproducing device moves lengthwise, similar to a lathe’s cutting tool, as the blank or record rotates. It was soon understood that using a single needle for both recording and reproduction was not ideal, since creating the record needed a very sharp cutting tool, whereas effective and consistent reproduction required a stylus that would minimize wear. After many experiments and the development of several machine types, the recorders and reproducers we have today were created. The recorders use a very small cylindrical gouging tool about forty thousandths of an inch in diameter, and the reproducers utilize a ball or button-shaped stylus around thirty-five thousandths of an inch in diameter. By using this kind of cutting tool, the record is formed from a series of connected gouges with rounded edges, varying in depth and width, to which the reproducer automatically aligns and maintains contact. Another challenge in commercially developing the phonograph was adjusting the recording stylus to enter the wax-like surface slightly and having the reproducer engage the record precisely when it was formed. Earlier machines had separate screws for these adjustments, but achieving good results required considerable skill, and it was difficult to accommodate variations in the wax-like cylinders caused by environmental changes. So, with the early commercial phonographs, it was first essential to shave the blank accurately before creating a record to ensure a perfectly smooth surface. To address these issues, a clever solution was proposed and implemented, connecting the recording and reproducing styli to their respective diaphragms via a compensating weight, which acted as a fixed support under rapid sound vibrations but flexibly absorbed distortions or variations in the wax-like cylinders. This improvement allowed for the elimination of all adjustments, with the weight's mass enabling the recorder to automatically engage the blank to the required depth and keep the reproducing stylus applying the desired pressure on the finished record. These automatic adjustments remained effective even if the blank or record was misaligned by up to an eighth of an inch, which is more than two hundred times the maximum depth of the record groove.
Another improvement that followed along the lines adopted by Edison for the commercial development of the phonograph was making the recording and reproducing styluses of sapphire, an extremely hard, non-oxidizable jewel, so that those tiny instruments would always retain their true form and effectively resist wear. Of course, in this work many other things were done that may still be found on the perfected phonograph as it stands to-day, and many other suggestions were made which were contemporaneously adopted, but which were later abandoned. For the curious-minded, reference is made to the records in the Patent Office, which will show that up to 1893 Edison had obtained upward of sixty-five patents in this art, from which his line of thought can be very closely traced. The phonograph of to-day, except for the perfection of its mechanical features, in its beauty of manufacture and design, and in small details, may be considered identical with the machine of 1889, with the exception that with the latter the rotation of the record cylinder was effected by an electric motor.
Another improvement that followed Edison's approach to the commercial development of the phonograph was using sapphire for the recording and reproducing styluses. Sapphire is a very hard, non-oxidizable gem, ensuring that these tiny instruments would always keep their shape and resist wear. Of course, during this time, many other advancements were made that can still be seen in today's perfected phonograph, along with many suggestions that were adopted temporarily but later discarded. For those who are curious, the records at the Patent Office show that up until 1893, Edison had secured over sixty-five patents in this field, from which his thought process can be closely traced. Today's phonograph, aside from the improvements in its mechanical features, beauty of design, and small details, can be considered nearly identical to the machine from 1889, except that the earlier model used an electric motor to rotate the record cylinder.
Its essential use as then contemplated was as a substitute for stenographers, and the most extravagant fancies were indulged in as to utility in that field. To exploit the device commercially, the patents were sold to Philadelphia capitalists, who organized the North American Phonograph Company, through which leases for limited periods were granted to local companies doing business in special territories, generally within the confines of a single State. Under that plan, resembling the methods of 1878, the machines and blank cylinders were manufactured by the Edison Phonograph Works, which still retains its factories at Orange, New Jersey. The marketing enterprise was early doomed to failure, principally because the instruments were not well understood, and did not possess the necessary refinements that would fit them for the special field in which they were to be used. At first the instruments were leased; but it was found that the leases were seldom renewed. Efforts were then made to sell them, but the prices were high—from $100 to $150. In the midst of these difficulties, the chief promoter of the enterprise, Mr. Lippincott, died; and it was soon found that the roseate dreams of success entertained by the sanguine promoters were not to be realized. The North American Phonograph Company failed, its principal creditor being Mr. Edison, who, having acquired the assets of the defunct concern, organized the National Phonograph Company, to which he turned over the patents; and with characteristic energy he attempted again to build up a business with which his favorite and, to him, most interesting invention might be successfully identified. The National Phonograph Company from the very start determined to retire at least temporarily from the field of stenographic use, and to exploit the phonograph for musical purposes as a competitor of the music-box. Hence it was necessary that for such work the relatively heavy and expensive electric motor should be discarded, and a simple spring motor constructed with a sufficiently sensitive governor to permit accurate musical reproduction. Such a motor was designed, and is now used on all phonographs except on such special instruments as may be made with electric motors, as well as on the successful apparatus that has more recently been designed and introduced for stenographic use. Improved factory facilities were introduced; new tools were made, and various types of machines were designed so that phonographs can now be bought at prices ranging from $10 to $200. Even with the changes which were thus made in the two machines, the work of developing the business was slow, as a demand had to be created; and the early prejudice of the public against the phonograph, due to its failure as a stenographic apparatus, had to be overcome. The story of the phonograph as an industrial enterprise, from this point of departure, is itself full of interest, but embraces so many details that it is necessarily given in a separate later chapter. We must return to the days of 1878, when Edison, with at least three first-class inventions to his credit—the quadruplex, the carbon telephone, and the phonograph—had become a man of mark and a "world character."
Its primary purpose at that time was as a replacement for stenographers, and there were some pretty wild ideas about how useful it could be in that area. To sell the device commercially, the patents were handed over to investors in Philadelphia, who set up the North American Phonograph Company. This company granted leases for limited periods to local businesses operating in specific areas, usually within a single state. Following that strategy, similar to the methods used in 1878, the Edison Phonograph Works manufactured the machines and blank cylinders, which still has its factories in Orange, New Jersey. Unfortunately, the marketing venture was destined for failure early on, mainly because the devices weren't well understood and lacked the necessary refinements for the specific market they aimed to serve. Initially, the instruments were leased, but lease renewals were rare. Attempts were then made to sell them, but the prices were steep—ranging from $100 to $150. Amid these challenges, the chief promoter, Mr. Lippincott, passed away, and it soon became clear that the optimistic visions of success held by the enthusiastic promoters weren't going to happen. The North American Phonograph Company went under, with Mr. Edison being its main creditor. He acquired the assets of the failed company and established the National Phonograph Company, shifting the patents to it. With his usual drive, he tried again to build a business that could effectively showcase his favorite and most intriguing invention. From the get-go, the National Phonograph Company decided to step back, at least temporarily, from the stenographic market and instead focus on promoting the phonograph for musical purposes, competing with music boxes. This meant that the relatively heavy and pricey electric motor had to be replaced with a simple spring motor that had a sensitive governor for accurate musical reproduction. Such a motor was designed and is currently used on all phonographs, except for specific instruments made with electric motors, as well as on newer devices recently created for stenographic use. Enhanced factory capabilities were introduced; new tools were made, and various types of machines were developed so that phonographs now sell for prices between $10 and $200. Even with these changes, the business development proceeded slowly because there was a need to generate demand, and the initial public bias against the phonograph, stemming from its failure as a stenographic tool, had to be overcome. The tale of the phonograph as an industrial endeavor, starting from this point, is quite fascinating, but it's filled with so many details that it will be covered in a separate later chapter. We should return to 1878, when Edison, credited with at least three significant inventions—the quadruplex, the carbon telephone, and the phonograph—had made a name for himself and become a "world character."
The invention of the phonograph was immediately followed, as usual, by the appearance of several other incidental and auxiliary devices, some patented, and others remaining simply the application of the principles of apparatus that had been worked out. One of these was the telephonograph, a combination of a telephone at a distant station with a phonograph. The diaphragm of the phonograph mouthpiece is actuated by an electromagnet in the same way as that of an ordinary telephone receiver, and in this manner a record of the message spoken from a distance can be obtained and turned into sound at will. Evidently such a process is reversible, and the phonograph can send a message to the distant receiver.
The invention of the phonograph was quickly followed, as usual, by the introduction of several other related and supportive devices, some of which were patented while others were just variations on existing technology. One of these was the telephonograph, which combined a telephone at a distant location with a phonograph. The diaphragm of the phonograph’s mouthpiece is activated by an electromagnet in the same way as a regular telephone receiver, allowing a record of the message spoken from afar to be captured and played back as sound at will. Clearly, this process is reversible, meaning the phonograph can also send a message to the distant receiver.
This idea was brilliantly demonstrated in practice in February, 1889, by Mr. W. J. Hammer, one of Edison's earliest and most capable associates, who carried on telephonographic communication between New York and an audience in Philadelphia. The record made in New York on the Edison phonograph was repeated into an Edison carbon transmitter, sent over one hundred and three miles of circuit, including six miles of underground cable; received by an Edison motograph; repeated by that on to a phonograph; transferred from the phonograph to an Edison carbon transmitter, and by that delivered to the Edison motograph receiver in the enthusiastic lecture-hall, where every one could hear each sound and syllable distinctly. In real practice this spectacular playing with sound vibrations, as if they were lacrosse balls to toss around between the goals, could be materially simplified.
This concept was brilliantly put into action in February 1889 by Mr. W. J. Hammer, one of Edison's earliest and most skilled associates, who facilitated telephonic communication between New York and an audience in Philadelphia. The recording made in New York on the Edison phonograph was transmitted through an Edison carbon transmitter, sent over a circuit of over 103 miles, including six miles of underground cable; it was received by an Edison motograph, repeated onto a phonograph, then transferred from the phonograph to another Edison carbon transmitter, which delivered the signals to the Edison motograph receiver in the excited lecture hall, where everyone could hear each sound and syllable clearly. In practice, this impressive manipulation of sound waves, as if they were lacrosse balls tossed around between goals, could be significantly simplified.
The modern megaphone, now used universally in making announcements to large crowds, particularly at sporting events, is also due to this period as a perfection by Edison of many antecedent devices going back, perhaps, much further than the legendary funnels through which Alexander the Great is said to have sent commands to his outlying forces. The improved Edison megaphone for long-distance work comprised two horns of wood or metal about six feet long, tapering from a diameter of two feet six inches at the mouth to a small aperture provided with ear-tubes. These converging horns or funnels, with a large speaking-trumpet in between them, are mounted on a tripod, and the megaphone is complete. Conversation can be carried on with this megaphone at a distance of over two miles, as with a ship or the balloon. The modern megaphone now employs the receiver form thus introduced as its very effective transmitter, with which the old-fashioned speaking-trumpet cannot possibly compete; and the word "megaphone" is universally applied to the single, side-flaring horn.
The modern megaphone, now widely used for making announcements to large crowds, especially at sports events, is also a result of this period, stemming from Edison’s improvements on many earlier devices that date back, perhaps, much further than the legendary funnels through which Alexander the Great reportedly sent commands to his distant forces. The upgraded Edison megaphone for long-distance use consists of two horns made of wood or metal, each about six feet long, tapering from a diameter of two feet six inches at the mouth to a small opening equipped with ear tubes. These converging horns or funnels, with a large speaking trumpet in between them, are mounted on a tripod, completing the megaphone. Conversations can be held with this megaphone at distances over two miles, similar to communication with a ship or a balloon. The modern megaphone now utilizes the receiver format introduced earlier as its highly effective transmitter, which old-fashioned speaking trumpets cannot match; and the term "megaphone" is now commonly used to refer to the single, side-flaring horn.
A further step in this line brought Edison to the "aerophone," around which the Figaro weaved its fanciful description. In the construction of the aerophone the same kind of tympanum is used as in the phonograph, but the imitation of the human voice, or the transmission of sound, is effected by the quick opening and closing of valves placed within a steam-whistle or an organ-pipe. The vibrations of the diaphragm communicated to the valves cause them to operate in synchronism, so that the vibrations are thrown upon the escaping air or steam; and the result is an instrument with a capacity of magnifying the sounds two hundred times, and of hurling them to great distances intelligibly, like a huge fog-siren, but with immense clearness and penetration. All this study of sound transmission over long distances without wires led up to the consideration and invention of pioneer apparatus for wireless telegraphy—but that also is another chapter.
A further step in this journey led Edison to the "aerophone," around which the Figaro spun its imaginative description. In building the aerophone, the same type of tympanum used in the phonograph is employed, but the imitation of the human voice, or the transmission of sound, happens through the rapid opening and closing of valves inside a steam whistle or an organ pipe. The diaphragm's vibrations trigger the valves to work in sync, allowing the vibrations to be projected into the escaping air or steam. The result is an instrument that can amplify sounds two hundred times and send them clearly over great distances, similar to a large fog siren but with incredible clarity and depth. All this exploration of sound transmission over long distances without wires eventually led to the consideration and creation of early devices for wireless telegraphy—but that's a different topic.
Yet one more ingenious device of this period must be noted—Edison's vocal engine, the patent application for which was executed in August, 1878, the patent being granted the following December. Reference to this by Edison himself has already been quoted. The "voice-engine," or "phonomotor," converts the vibrations of the voice or of music, acting on the diaphragm, into motion which is utilized to drive some secondary appliance, whether as a toy or for some useful purpose. Thus a man can actually talk a hole through a board.
One more clever invention from this time deserves attention—Edison's vocal engine, for which the patent application was filed in August 1878, and the patent was granted the following December. Edison himself has already mentioned this. The "voice-engine," or "phonomotor," turns the vibrations from a voice or music, which act on the diaphragm, into motion that powers a secondary device, whether it's a toy or something practical. So, a person can actually talk a hole through a board.
Somewhat weary of all this work and excitement, and not having enjoyed any cessation from toil, or period of rest, for ten years, Edison jumped eagerly at the opportunity afforded him in the summer of 1878 of making a westward trip. Just thirty years later, on a similar trip over the same ground, he jotted down for this volume some of his reminiscences. The lure of 1878 was the opportunity to try the ability of his delicate tasimeter during the total eclipse of the sun, July 29. His admiring friend, Prof. George F. Barker, of the University of Pennsylvania, with whom he had now been on terms of intimacy for some years, suggested the holiday, and was himself a member of the excursion party that made its rendezvous at Rawlins, Wyoming Territory. Edison had tested his tasimeter, and was satisfied that it would measure down to the millionth part of a degree Fahrenheit. It was just ten years since he had left the West in poverty and obscurity, a penniless operator in search of a job; but now he was a great inventor and famous, a welcome addition to the band of astronomers and physicists assembled to observe the eclipse and the corona.
A bit tired of all the work and excitement, and not having taken a break or had any downtime for ten years, Edison eagerly seized the chance for a trip west in the summer of 1878. Just thirty years later, on a similar journey along the same route, he noted down some of his memories for this volume. The draw of 1878 was the chance to test his sensitive tasimeter during the total solar eclipse on July 29. His friend, Prof. George F. Barker from the University of Pennsylvania, who had been close with him for several years, suggested the getaway and joined the group that gathered in Rawlins, Wyoming Territory. Edison had already tested his tasimeter and was confident it could measure down to the millionth of a degree Fahrenheit. It had been just a decade since he had left the West in poverty and anonymity, a broke operator searching for a job; now he was a renowned inventor, a celebrated addition to the group of astronomers and physicists gathered to observe the eclipse and the corona.
"There were astronomers from nearly every nation," says Mr. Edison. "We had a special car. The country at that time was rather new; game was in great abundance, and could be seen all day long from the car window, especially antelope. We arrived at Rawlins about 4 P.M. It had a small machine shop, and was the point where locomotives were changed for the next section. The hotel was a very small one, and by doubling up we were barely accommodated. My room-mate was Fox, the correspondent of the New York Herald. After we retired and were asleep a thundering knock on the door awakened us. Upon opening the door a tall, handsome man with flowing hair dressed in western style entered the room. His eyes were bloodshot, and he was somewhat inebriated. He introduced himself as 'Texas Jack'—Joe Chromondo—and said he wanted to see Edison, as he had read about me in the newspapers. Both Fox and I were rather scared, and didn't know what was to be the result of the interview. The landlord requested him not to make so much noise, and was thrown out into the hall. Jack explained that he had just come in with a party which had been hunting, and that he felt fine. He explained, also, that he was the boss pistol-shot of the West; that it was he who taught the celebrated Doctor Carver how to shoot. Then suddenly pointing to a weather-vane on the freight depot, he pulled out a Colt revolver and fired through the window, hitting the vane. The shot awakened all the people, and they rushed in to see who was killed. It was only after I told him I was tired and would see him in the morning that he left. Both Fox and I were so nervous we didn't sleep any that night.
"There were astronomers from almost every country," Mr. Edison says. "We had a special car. At that time, the country was pretty new; there was plenty of game, and we could see it all day long from the car window, especially antelope. We got to Rawlins around 4 P.M. It had a small machine shop and was the place where locomotives were switched for the next section. The hotel was tiny, and by sharing rooms, we were just barely accommodated. My roommate was Fox, the correspondent for the New York Herald. After we turned in and were asleep, a loud knock on the door woke us up. When I opened the door, a tall, good-looking guy with long hair dressed in western style came into the room. His eyes were bloodshot, and he was a bit drunk. He introduced himself as 'Texas Jack'—Joe Chromondo—and said he wanted to see Edison because he had read about me in the newspapers. Both Fox and I were pretty scared and had no idea what would come from this meeting. The landlord asked him to keep it down, and he was thrown out into the hallway. Jack explained that he had just come in with a hunting party and that he felt great. He also mentioned that he was the best pistol shooter in the West; that he had taught the famous Doctor Carver how to shoot. Then, suddenly pointing at a weather vane on the freight depot, he pulled out a Colt revolver and fired through the window, hitting the vane. The shot startled everyone, and they rushed in to see what had happened. It was only after I told him I was tired and would catch up with him in the morning that he left. Both Fox and I were so on edge that we didn’t get any sleep that night."
"We were told in the morning that Jack was a pretty good fellow, and was not one of the 'bad men,' of whom they had a good supply. They had one in the jail, and Fox and I went over to see him. A few days before he had held up a Union Pacific train and robbed all the passengers. In the jail also was a half-breed horse-thief. We interviewed the bad man through bars as big as railroad rails. He looked like a 'bad man.' The rim of his ear all around came to a sharp edge and was serrated. His eyes were nearly white, and appeared as if made of glass and set in wrong, like the life-size figures of Indians in the Smithsonian Institution. His face was also extremely irregular. He wouldn't answer a single question. I learned afterward that he got seven years in prison, while the horse-thief was hanged. As horses ran wild, and there was no protection, it meant death to steal one."
"We were told in the morning that Jack was a pretty decent guy and wasn’t one of the 'bad men,' of which they had plenty. They had one in jail, and Fox and I went over to check him out. A few days earlier, he had held up a Union Pacific train and robbed all the passengers. In the jail, there was also a half-breed horse-thief. We talked to the bad man through bars as thick as railroad tracks. He definitely looked like a 'bad man.' The edges of his ears were sharp and jagged. His eyes were almost white and looked like they were made of glass and placed incorrectly, similar to the lifelike figures of Indians in the Smithsonian Institution. His face was very irregular too. He didn’t answer a single question. I found out later that he got seven years in prison, while the horse-thief got hanged. Since horses ran wild and there was no protection, stealing one usually meant death."
This was one interlude among others. "The first thing the astronomers did was to determine with precision their exact locality upon the earth. A number of observations were made, and Watson, of Michigan University, with two others, worked all night computing, until they agreed. They said they were not in error more than one hundred feet, and that the station was twelve miles out of the position given on the maps. It seemed to take an immense amount of mathematics. I preserved one of the sheets, which looked like the time-table of a Chinese railroad. The instruments of the various parties were then set up in different parts of the little town, and got ready for the eclipse which was to occur in three or four days. Two days before the event we all got together, and obtaining an engine and car, went twelve miles farther west to visit the United States Government astronomers at a place called Separation, the apex of the Great Divide, where the waters run east to the Mississippi and west to the Pacific. Fox and I took our Winchester rifles with an idea of doing a little shooting. After calling on the Government people we started to interview the telegraph operator at this most lonely and desolate spot. After talking over old acquaintances I asked him if there was any game around. He said, 'Plenty of jack-rabbits.' These jack-rabbits are a very peculiar species. They have ears about six inches long and very slender legs, about three times as long as those of an ordinary rabbit, and travel at a great speed by a series of jumps, each about thirty feet long, as near as I could judge. The local people called them 'narrow-gauge mules.' Asking the operator the best direction, he pointed west, and noticing a rabbit in a clear space in the sage bushes, I said, 'There is one now.' I advanced cautiously to within one hundred feet and shot. The rabbit paid no attention. I then advanced to within ten feet and shot again—the rabbit was still immovable. On looking around, the whole crowd at the station were watching—and then I knew the rabbit was stuffed! However, we did shoot a number of live ones until Fox ran out of cartridges. On returning to the station I passed away the time shooting at cans set on a pile of tins. Finally the operator said to Fox: 'I have a fine Springfield musket, suppose you try it!' So Fox took the musket and fired. It knocked him nearly over. It seems that the musket had been run over by a handcar, which slightly bent the long barrel, but not sufficiently for an amateur like Fox to notice. After Fox had his shoulder treated with arnica at the Government hospital tent, we returned to Rawlins."
This was just one of the many moments. "The first thing the astronomers did was pin down their exact location on Earth. They took several readings, and Watson from Michigan University, along with two others, worked all night calculating until they reached an agreement. They claimed they were off by no more than one hundred feet and that the station was twelve miles from where the maps indicated. It required a huge amount of math. I kept one of the pages, which looked like a schedule from a Chinese railroad. The instruments from various teams were then set up in different areas of the small town, getting ready for the eclipse that was happening in three or four days. Two days before the event, we all met up, got a train and a car, and traveled twelve miles further west to visit the U.S. Government astronomers at a spot called Separation, the highest point of the Great Divide, where the waters flow east to the Mississippi and west to the Pacific. Fox and I brought our Winchester rifles, hoping to do a bit of shooting. After visiting the Government team, we started to chat with the telegraph operator in this incredibly lonely and desolate place. After catching up on old friends, I asked him about any game in the area. He replied, 'Plenty of jackrabbits.' These jackrabbits are a very unique breed. They have ears about six inches long and very slender legs, roughly three times the length of a typical rabbit's legs, and move at high speeds in long jumps, each about thirty feet, as far as I could tell. The locals referred to them as 'narrow-gauge mules.' When I asked the operator the best direction to hunt, he pointed west. I spotted a rabbit in a clear area amidst the sagebrush and said, 'There’s one now.' I moved carefully within a hundred feet and shot. The rabbit didn’t flinch. I crept within ten feet and shot again—the rabbit was still motionless. Looking around, I noticed everyone at the station was watching me, and that’s when I realized the rabbit was stuffed! Nonetheless, we managed to shoot several live ones until Fox ran out of cartridges. On the way back to the station, I spent time shooting at cans stacked on a pile of tin. Eventually, the operator said to Fox, 'I have a nice Springfield musket; why don’t you give it a try?' So Fox took the musket and fired. It nearly knocked him over. It turned out the musket had been run over by a handcar, which slightly bent the long barrel, but not enough for an amateur like Fox to notice. After treating Fox’s shoulder with arnica at the Government hospital tent, we headed back to Rawlins."
The eclipse was, however, the prime consideration, and Edison followed the example of his colleagues in making ready. The place which he secured for setting up his tasimeter was an enclosure hardly suitable for the purpose, and he describes the results as follows:
The eclipse was the main focus, so Edison prepared just like his colleagues. The spot he chose to set up his tasimeter wasn't really suitable for it, and he described the results like this:
"I had my apparatus in a small yard enclosed by a board fence six feet high, at one end there was a house for hens. I noticed that they all went to roost just before totality. At the same time a slight wind arose, and at the moment of totality the atmosphere was filled with thistle-down and other light articles. I noticed one feather, whose weight was at least one hundred and fifty milligrams, rise perpendicularly to the top of the fence, where it floated away on the wind. My apparatus was entirely too sensitive, and I got no results." It was found that the heat from the corona of the sun was ten times the index capacity of the instrument; but this result did not leave the value of the device in doubt. The Scientific American remarked;
"I had my equipment set up in a small yard surrounded by a six-foot-high wooden fence, with a chicken coop at one end. I noticed that all the hens went to roost just before totality. At the same time, a gentle breeze picked up, and at the moment of totality, the air was filled with thistle fluff and other lightweight debris. I observed one feather, weighing at least one hundred and fifty milligrams, rise straight up to the top of the fence, then drift away on the wind. My equipment was way too sensitive, and I didn’t get any results." It was determined that the heat from the sun's corona was ten times the measurement capacity of the instrument; however, this outcome did not undermine the value of the device. The Scientific American noted;
"Seeing that the tasimeter is affected by a wider range of etheric undulations than the eye can take cognizance of, and is withal far more acutely sensitive, the probabilities are that it will open up hitherto inaccessible regions of space, and possibly extend the range of aerial knowledge as far beyond the limit obtained by the telescope as that is beyond the narrow reach of unaided vision."
"Since the tasimeter is influenced by a broader range of etheric waves than what the eye can perceive and is also much more sensitive, it's likely that it will reveal areas of space that were previously out of reach, possibly expanding our understanding of the skies far beyond what telescopes can achieve, just as telescopes go beyond what we can see with the naked eye."
The eclipse over, Edison, with Professor Barker, Major Thornberg, several soldiers, and a number of railroad officials, went hunting about one hundred miles south of the railroad in the Ute country. A few months later the Major and thirty soldiers were ambushed near the spot at which the hunting-party had camped, and all were killed. Through an introduction from Mr. Jay Gould, who then controlled the Union Pacific, Edison was allowed to ride on the cow-catchers of the locomotives. "The different engineers gave me a small cushion, and every day I rode in this manner, from Omaha to the Sacramento Valley, except through the snow-shed on the summit of the Sierras, without dust or anything else to obstruct the view. Only once was I in danger when the locomotive struck an animal about the size of a small cub bear—which I think was a badger. This animal struck the front of the locomotive just under the headlight with great violence, and was then thrown off by the rebound. I was sitting to one side grasping the angle brace, so no harm was done."
The eclipse over, Edison, along with Professor Barker, Major Thornberg, several soldiers, and some railroad officials, went hunting about a hundred miles south of the railroad in Ute territory. A few months later, the Major and thirty soldiers were ambushed near where the hunting party had camped, and all were killed. Thanks to an introduction from Mr. Jay Gould, who was then in charge of the Union Pacific, Edison was allowed to ride on the cow-catchers of the locomotives. "The different engineers gave me a small cushion, and every day I rode this way from Omaha to the Sacramento Valley, except through the snow-shed at the summit of the Sierras, without dust or anything else blocking the view. I was only in danger once when the locomotive hit an animal about the size of a small cub bear—which I think was a badger. This animal struck the front of the locomotive just under the headlight with great force and was then thrown off by the rebound. I was sitting to one side holding onto the angle brace, so I wasn't harmed."
This welcome vacation lasted nearly two months; but Edison was back in his laboratory and hard at work before the end of August, gathering up many loose ends, and trying out many thoughts and ideas that had accumulated on the trip. One hot afternoon—August 30th, as shown by the document in the case—Mr. Edison was found by one of the authors of this biography employed most busily in making a mysterious series of tests on paper, using for ink acids that corrugated and blistered the paper where written upon. When interrogated as to his object, he stated that the plan was to afford blind people the means of writing directly to each other, especially if they were also deaf and could not hear a message on the phonograph. The characters which he was thus forming on the paper were high enough in relief to be legible to the delicate touch of a blind man's fingers, and with simple apparatus letters could be thus written, sent, and read. There was certainly no question as to the result obtained at the moment, which was all that was asked; but the Edison autograph thus and then written now shows the paper eaten out by the acid used, although covered with glass for many years. Mr. Edison does not remember that he ever recurred to this very interesting test.
This much-needed vacation lasted almost two months, but Edison was back in his lab and hard at work before the end of August, tying up loose ends and experimenting with many ideas that had come to him during the trip. On a hot afternoon—August 30th, according to the document in the case—one of the authors of this biography found Mr. Edison deeply engaged in a series of intriguing tests on paper, using acids as ink that caused the paper to warp and blister where written. When asked about his purpose, he explained that the goal was to provide blind people with a way to write directly to each other, especially if they were also deaf and couldn’t hear a message on the phonograph. The characters he was creating on the paper were raised enough to be read by the sensitive touch of a blind person's fingers, and with simple tools, letters could be written, sent, and read. There was no doubt about the results he achieved at that moment, which was all that mattered; however, the Edison signature made at that time now shows the paper damaged by the acid used, even though it has been covered with glass for many years. Mr. Edison doesn’t recall ever revisiting this fascinating experiment.
He was, however, ready for anything new or novel, and no record can ever be made or presented that would do justice to a tithe of the thoughts and fancies daily and hourly put upon the rack. The famous note-books, to which reference will be made later, were not begun as a regular series, as it was only the profusion of these ideas that suggested the vital value of such systematic registration. Then as now, the propositions brought to Edison ranged over every conceivable subject, but the years have taught him caution in grappling with them. He tells an amusing story of one dilemma into which his good-nature led him at this period: "At Menlo Park one day, a farmer came in and asked if I knew any way to kill potato-bugs. He had twenty acres of potatoes, and the vines were being destroyed. I sent men out and culled two quarts of bugs, and tried every chemical I had to destroy them. Bisulphide of carbon was found to do it instantly. I got a drum and went over to the potato farm and sprinkled it on the vines with a pot. Every bug dropped dead. The next morning the farmer came in very excited and reported that the stuff had killed the vines as well. I had to pay $300 for not experimenting properly."
He was open to anything new or different, and no record can ever be created or shown that would accurately reflect even a fraction of the thoughts and ideas he continually struggled with. The famous notebooks, which will be discussed later, weren't started as an organized collection; it was only the sheer number of these ideas that highlighted the importance of keeping track of them systematically. Just like back then, the suggestions brought to Edison covered every possible topic, but over the years, he learned to be careful when tackling them. He shares a funny story about one predicament his willingness to help got him into during that time: "One day at Menlo Park, a farmer came in and asked if I knew how to get rid of potato bugs. He had twenty acres of potatoes, and the plants were being destroyed. I sent some guys out, collected two quarts of bugs, and tried every chemical I had to eliminate them. I found that bisulfide of carbon worked instantly. I got a drum and went over to the potato farm and sprayed it on the plants with a pot. Every bug dropped dead. The next morning, the farmer came in all excited and reported that the stuff had also killed the plants. I had to pay $300 for not experimenting properly."
During this year, 1878, the phonograph made its way also to Europe, and various sums of money were paid there to secure the rights to its manufacture and exploitation. In England, for example, the Microscopic Company paid $7500 down and agreed to a royalty, while arrangements were effected also in France, Russia, and other countries. In every instance, as in this country, the commercial development had to wait several years, for in the mean time another great art had been brought into existence, demanding exclusive attention and exhaustive toil. And when the work was done the reward was a new heaven and a new earth—in the art of illumination.
In 1878, the phonograph made its way to Europe, and various amounts of money were paid to secure the rights for its production and use. For instance, in England, the Microscopic Company paid $7,500 upfront and agreed to a royalty, while similar agreements were made in France, Russia, and other countries. In every case, just like in the U.S., the commercial growth had to wait several years because another major art form had emerged, requiring focused attention and intense work. And when that work was completed, the result was a whole new world—in the art of illumination.
CHAPTER XI
THE INVENTION OF THE INCANDESCENT LAMP
IT is possible to imagine a time to come when the hours of work and rest will once more be regulated by the sun. But the course of civilization has been marked by an artificial lengthening of the day, and by a constant striving after more perfect means of illumination. Why mankind should sleep through several hours of sunlight in the morning, and stay awake through a needless time in the evening, can probably only be attributed to total depravity. It is certainly a most stupid, expensive, and harmful habit. In no one thing has man shown greater fertility of invention than in lighting; to nothing does he cling more tenaciously than to his devices for furnishing light. Electricity to-day reigns supreme in the field of illumination, but every other kind of artificial light that has ever been known is still in use somewhere. Toward its light-bringers the race has assumed an attitude of veneration, though it has forgotten, if it ever heard, the names of those who first brightened its gloom and dissipated its darkness. If the tallow candle, hitherto unknown, were now invented, its creator would be hailed as one of the greatest benefactors of the present age.
It's possible to imagine a future where work and rest hours are once again dictated by the sun. However, the development of civilization has been characterized by an artificial extension of the day and a continuous pursuit of better lighting methods. The reason people choose to sleep through several hours of morning sunlight and stay awake unnecessarily in the evening can likely be traced back to sheer foolishness. It’s certainly a very silly, costly, and damaging habit. In no area has humanity demonstrated greater creativity than in lighting; nothing is held on to more stubbornly than our gadgets for providing light. Electricity currently dominates the lighting scene, but every other type of artificial light ever created is still used somewhere. Society has adopted a reverential attitude toward those who bring light, even though it has forgotten, or may never have known, the names of the pioneers who first illuminated its darkness. If the tallow candle, previously unknown, were invented today, its inventor would be celebrated as one of the greatest contributors to our modern age.
Up to the close of the eighteenth century, the means of house and street illumination were of two generic kinds—grease and oil; but then came a swift and revolutionary change in the adoption of gas. The ideas and methods of Murdoch and Lebon soon took definite shape, and "coal smoke" was piped from its place of origin to distant points of consumption. As early as 1804, the first company ever organized for gas lighting was formed in London, one side of Pall Mall being lit up by the enthusiastic pioneer, Winsor, in 1807. Equal activity was shown in America, and Baltimore began the practice of gas lighting in 1816. It is true that there were explosions, and distinguished men like Davy and Watt opined that the illuminant was too dangerous; but the "spirit of coal" had demonstrated its usefulness convincingly, and a commercial development began, which, for extent and rapidity, was not inferior to that marking the concurrent adoption of steam in industry and transportation.
Up until the end of the eighteenth century, the ways to light homes and streets were basically two types—grease and oil; but then a quick and transformative shift happened with the introduction of gas. The concepts and techniques developed by Murdoch and Lebon quickly took form, and "coal smoke" was transported via pipes from where it was produced to far-off places. As early as 1804, the first gas lighting company was established in London, with Winsor, the enthusiastic pioneer, illuminating one side of Pall Mall in 1807. A similar enthusiasm was seen in America, where Baltimore started using gas lighting in 1816. It's true that there were some explosions, and notable figures like Davy and Watt argued that the gas was too risky; however, the "spirit of coal" had clearly proven its value, and a commercial boom began, which was as significant and rapid as the simultaneous rise of steam in industry and transportation.
Meantime the wax candle and the Argand oil lamp held their own bravely. The whaling fleets, long after gas came into use, were one of the greatest sources of our national wealth. To New Bedford, Massachusetts, alone, some three or four hundred ships brought their whale and sperm oil, spermaceti, and whalebone; and at one time that port was accounted the richest city in the United States in proportion to its population. The ship-owners and refiners of that whaling metropolis were slow to believe that their monopoly could ever be threatened by newer sources of illumination; but gas had become available in the cities, and coal-oil and petroleum were now added to the list of illuminating materials. The American whaling fleet, which at the time of Edison's birth mustered over seven hundred sail, had dwindled probably to a bare tenth when he took up the problem of illumination; and the competition of oil from the ground with oil from the sea, and with coal-gas, had made the artificial production of light cheaper than ever before, when up to the middle of the century it had remained one of the heaviest items of domestic expense. Moreover, just about the time that Edison took up incandescent lighting, water-gas was being introduced on a large scale as a commercial illuminant that could be produced at a much lower cost than coal-gas.
Meanwhile, the wax candle and the Argand oil lamp held their ground bravely. The whaling fleets, long after gas became popular, were one of the biggest sources of our national wealth. New Bedford, Massachusetts, alone received around three or four hundred ships carrying whale oil, sperm oil, spermaceti, and whalebone; at one point, that port was considered the richest city in the United States relative to its population. The ship owners and refiners in that whaling hub were slow to realize that their monopoly could ever be threatened by newer sources of light, but gas had started to be used in cities, and coal oil and petroleum were now on the list of lighting options. The American whaling fleet, which had more than seven hundred ships when Edison was born, had probably shrunk to just a tenth of that number by the time he began to work on illumination; the competition between oil from underground and oil from the sea, along with coal gas, made producing light artificially cheaper than ever before, after it had been one of the largest domestic expenses up until the middle of the century. Moreover, around the time Edison started focusing on incandescent lighting, water gas was being rolled out on a large scale as a commercial lighting source that could be produced at a much lower cost than coal gas.
Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century the search for a practical electric light was almost wholly in the direction of employing methods analogous to those already familiar; in other words, obtaining the illumination from the actual consumption of the light-giving material. In the third quarter of the century these methods were brought to practicality, but all may be referred back to the brilliant demonstrations of Sir Humphry Davy at the Royal Institution, circa 1809-10, when, with the current from a battery of two thousand cells, he produced an intense voltaic arc between the points of consuming sticks of charcoal. For more than thirty years the arc light remained an expensive laboratory experiment; but the coming of the dynamo placed that illuminant on a commercial basis. The mere fact that electrical energy from the least expensive chemical battery using up zinc and acids costs twenty times as much as that from a dynamo—driven by steam-engine—is in itself enough to explain why so many of the electric arts lingered in embryo after their fundamental principles had been discovered. Here is seen also further proof of the great truth that one invention often waits for another.
Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the quest for a practical electric light focused primarily on methods similar to those already known; in other words, generating light from the actual consumption of the illuminating material. In the third quarter of the century, these methods became practical, all tracing back to the impressive demonstrations by Sir Humphry Davy at the Royal Institution around 1809-10, when he used a battery of two thousand cells to create a bright voltaic arc between two burning charcoal sticks. For more than thirty years, the arc light remained an expensive laboratory experiment; however, the advent of the dynamo made this form of lighting commercially viable. The simple fact that electrical energy from the cheapest chemical battery, which consumes zinc and acids, costs twenty times more than that from a dynamo powered by a steam engine explains why many electric innovations remained undeveloped even after their fundamental principles were discovered. This also illustrates the important truth that one invention often waits for another.
From 1850 onward the improvements in both the arc lamp and the dynamo were rapid; and under the superintendence of the great Faraday, in 1858, protecting beams of intense electric light from the voltaic arc were shed over the waters of the Straits of Dover from the beacons of South Foreland and Dungeness. By 1878 the arc-lighting industry had sprung into existence in so promising a manner as to engender an extraordinary fever and furor of speculation. At the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition of 1876, Wallace-Farmer dynamos built at Ansonia, Connecticut, were shown, with the current from which arc lamps were there put in actual service. A year or two later the work of Charles F. Brush and Edward Weston laid the deep foundation of modern arc lighting in America, securing as well substantial recognition abroad.
From 1850 onward, advancements in both the arc lamp and the dynamo were rapid. Under the guidance of the great Faraday, in 1858, intense electric beams from the voltaic arc illuminated the waters of the Straits of Dover from the beacons of South Foreland and Dungeness. By 1878, the arc-lighting industry had emerged strongly, sparking an incredible wave of speculation. At the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition in 1876, Wallace-Farmer dynamos made in Ansonia, Connecticut, were showcased, providing power to arc lamps that were put into actual use. A year or two later, the work of Charles F. Brush and Edward Weston established the solid foundation of modern arc lighting in America, gaining significant recognition abroad.
Thus the new era had been ushered in, but it was based altogether on the consumption of some material—carbon—in a lamp open to the air. Every lamp the world had ever known did this, in one way or another. Edison himself began at that point, and his note-books show that he made various experiments with this type of lamp at a very early stage. Indeed, his experiments had led him so far as to anticipate in 1875 what are now known as "flaming arcs," the exceedingly bright and generally orange or rose-colored lights which have been introduced within the last few years, and are now so frequently seen in streets and public places. While the arcs with plain carbons are bluish-white, those with carbons containing calcium fluoride have a notable golden glow.
So, a new era had begun, but it was completely centered around the use of a material—carbon—in a lamp exposed to air. Every lamp the world had known did this in one way or another. Edison started from that point, and his notebooks show that he conducted various experiments with this kind of lamp very early on. In fact, his experiments even led him to anticipate in 1875 what we now call "flaming arcs," those very bright lights that are usually orange or rose-colored and have been introduced in recent years, often seen in streets and public spaces. While the arcs with plain carbons are bluish-white, those with carbons containing calcium fluoride have a distinct golden glow.
He was convinced, however, that the greatest field of lighting lay in the illumination of houses and other comparatively enclosed areas, to replace the ordinary gas light, rather than in the illumination of streets and other outdoor places by lights of great volume and brilliancy. Dismissing from his mind quickly the commercial impossibility of using arc lights for general indoor illumination, he arrived at the conclusion that an electric lamp giving light by incandescence was the solution of the problem.
He was certain, however, that the biggest opportunity for lighting was in illuminating homes and other enclosed spaces, to replace regular gas lights, rather than in lighting streets and other outdoor areas with very bright and powerful lights. Quickly setting aside the commercial challenges of using arc lights for general indoor lighting, he concluded that an electric lamp that produced light through incandescence was the answer to the problem.
Edison was familiar with the numerous but impracticable and commercially unsuccessful efforts that had been previously made by other inventors and investigators to produce electric light by incandescence, and at the time that he began his experiments, in 1877, almost the whole scientific world had pronounced such an idea as impossible of fulfilment. The leading electricians, physicists, and experts of the period had been studying the subject for more than a quarter of a century, and with but one known exception had proven mathematically and by close reasoning that the "Subdivision of the Electric Light," as it was then termed, was practically beyond attainment. Opinions of this nature have ever been but a stimulus to Edison when he has given deep thought to a subject, and has become impressed with strong convictions of possibility, and in this particular case he was satisfied that the subdivision of the electric light—or, more correctly, the subdivision of the electric current—was not only possible but entirely practicable.
Edison was aware of the many attempts made by other inventors and researchers to create electric light through incandescence, but most of these efforts were impractical and commercially unsuccessful. When he started his experiments in 1877, almost the entire scientific community considered the idea impossible. The leading electricians, physicists, and experts had been studying the topic for over 25 years and, with one known exception, had mathematically demonstrated and reasoned that what was then called the "Subdivision of the Electric Light" was practically unattainable. Such opinions have always motivated Edison when he deeply considered a subject and developed strong beliefs about what was possible. In this particular case, he was convinced that the subdivision of electric light—or more accurately, the subdivision of the electric current—was not just possible, but entirely feasible.
It will have been perceived from the foregoing chapters that from the time of boyhood, when he first began to rub against the world, his commercial instincts were alert and predominated in almost all of the enterprises that he set in motion. This characteristic trait had grown stronger as he matured, having received, as it did, fresh impetus and strength from his one lapse in the case of his first patented invention, the vote-recorder. The lesson he then learned was to devote his inventive faculties only to things for which there was a real, genuine demand, and that would subserve the actual necessities of humanity; and it was probably a fortunate circumstance that this lesson was learned at the outset of his career as an inventor. He has never assumed to be a philosopher or "pure scientist."
It can be seen from the previous chapters that from his boyhood, when he first started interacting with the world, his business instincts were sharp and dominated nearly all the projects he began. This trait grew stronger as he got older, gaining new energy and strength from his one mistake with his first patented invention, the vote-recorder. The lesson he learned was to focus his creativity only on things that had a real, genuine demand and would meet the actual needs of people; it was probably a good thing that he learned this lesson at the start of his career as an inventor. He has never claimed to be a philosopher or a "pure scientist."
In order that the reader may grasp an adequate idea of the magnitude and importance of Edison's invention of the incandescent lamp, it will be necessary to review briefly the "state of the art" at the time he began his experiments on that line. After the invention of the voltaic battery, early in the last century, experiments were made which determined that heat could be produced by the passage of the electric current through wires of platinum and other metals, and through pieces of carbon, as noted already, and it was, of course, also observed that if sufficient current were passed through these conductors they could be brought from the lower stage of redness up to the brilliant white heat of incandescence. As early as 1845 the results of these experiments were taken advantage of when Starr, a talented American who died at the early age of twenty-five, suggested, in his English patent of that year, two forms of small incandescent electric lamps, one having a burner made from platinum foil placed under a glass cover without excluding the air; and the other composed of a thin plate or pencil of carbon enclosed in a Torricellian vacuum. These suggestions of young Starr were followed by many other experimenters, whose improvements consisted principally in devices to increase the compactness and portability of the lamp, in the sealing of the lamp chamber to prevent the admission of air, and in means for renewing the carbon burner when it had been consumed. Thus Roberts, in 1852, proposed to cement the neck of the glass globe into a metallic cup, and to provide it with a tube or stop-cock for exhaustion by means of a hand-pump. Lodyguine, Konn, Kosloff, and Khotinsky, between 1872 and 1877, proposed various ingenious devices for perfecting the joint between the metal base and the glass globe, and also provided their lamps with several short carbon pencils, which were automatically brought into circuit successively as the pencils were consumed. In 1876 or 1877, Bouliguine proposed the employment of a long carbon pencil, a short section only of which was in circuit at any one time and formed the burner, the lamp being provided with a mechanism for automatically pushing other sections of the pencil into position between the contacts to renew the burner. Sawyer and Man proposed, in 1878, to make the bottom plate of glass instead of metal, and provided ingenious arrangements for charging the lamp chamber with an atmosphere of pure nitrogen gas which does not support combustion.
To help the reader understand the significance and scale of Edison's invention of the incandescent lamp, it's important to briefly look at the "state of the art" when he started his experiments. After the voltaic battery was invented early in the last century, experiments showed that heat could be generated by passing an electric current through platinum wires, other metals, and pieces of carbon. It was also observed that if enough current flowed through these materials, they could be heated from a dull red to a bright white glow. As early as 1845, these findings were utilized when Starr, a gifted American who died at just twenty-five, proposed in his English patent that year two types of small incandescent electric lamps: one featuring a burner made from platinum foil under a glass cover that allowed air in, and the other using a thin carbon rod enclosed in a Torricellian vacuum. Starr’s ideas inspired many other inventors, who mainly focused on making the lamp more compact and portable, sealing the lamp to prevent air from entering, and finding ways to replace the carbon burner once it was used up. For instance, in 1852, Roberts suggested sealing the neck of the glass globe into a metal cup and adding a tube or stop-cock for vacuuming with a hand pump. Between 1872 and 1877, Lodyguine, Konn, Kosloff, and Khotinsky introduced various clever designs to improve the connection between the metal base and the glass globe, also incorporating multiple short carbon rods that would automatically engage in the circuit as the previous ones burned out. Around 1876 or 1877, Bouliguine recommended using a long carbon rod, where only a short section was active at any given moment to serve as the burner, with a mechanism to automatically bring new sections into place. In 1878, Sawyer and Man proposed making the bottom plate of glass instead of metal, introducing smart features for filling the lamp chamber with pure nitrogen gas, which doesn't support burning.
These lamps and many others of similar character, ingenious as they were, failed to become of any commercial value, due, among other things, to the brief life of the carbon burner. Even under the best conditions it was found that the carbon members were subject to a rapid disintegration or evaporation, which experimenters assumed was due to the disrupting action of the electric current; and hence the conclusion that carbon contained in itself the elements of its own destruction, and was not a suitable material for the burner of an incandescent lamp. On the other hand, platinum, although found to be the best of all materials for the purpose, aside from its great expense, and not combining with oxygen at high temperatures as does carbon, required to be brought so near the melting-point in order to give light, that a very slight increase in the temperature resulted in its destruction. It was assumed that the difficulty lay in the material of the burner itself, and not in its environment.
These lamps and many similar ones, as clever as they were, didn’t have any commercial value because the carbon burner had a short lifespan. Even under the best conditions, it was found that the carbon elements broke down or evaporated quickly, which experimenters thought was caused by the disruptive action of the electric current. They concluded that carbon had the elements of its own destruction and wasn’t a suitable material for the burner of an incandescent lamp. On the other hand, platinum was found to be the best material for this purpose, but its high cost and the fact that it doesn’t combine with oxygen at high temperatures like carbon does, meant it had to be brought very close to its melting point to produce light. A slight increase in temperature would lead to its destruction. It was believed that the problem lay in the material of the burner itself, not in its environment.
It was not realized up to such a comparatively recent date as 1879 that the solution of the great problem of subdivision of the electric current would not, however, be found merely in the production of a durable incandescent electric lamp—even if any of the lamps above referred to had fulfilled that requirement. The other principal features necessary to subdivide the electric current successfully were: the burning of an indefinite number of lights on the same circuit; each light to give a useful and economical degree of illumination; and each light to be independent of all the others in regard to its operation and extinguishment.
It wasn't until a relatively recent time, around 1879, that people understood that solving the major issue of dividing the electric current wouldn't just come from creating a long-lasting incandescent electric lamp—even if any of the lamps mentioned had met that standard. Other key aspects needed to successfully divide the electric current included: the ability to light an unlimited number of bulbs on the same circuit; each bulb providing a useful and cost-effective level of brightness; and each bulb being able to operate and turn off independently of the others.
The opinions of scientific men of the period on the subject are well represented by the two following extracts—the first, from a lecture at the Royal United Service Institution, about February, 1879, by Mr. (Sir) W. H. Preece, one of the most eminent electricians in England, who, after discussing the question mathematically, said: "Hence the sub-division of the light is an absolute ignis fatuus." The other extract is from a book written by Paget Higgs, LL.D., D.Sc., published in London in 1879, in which he says: "Much nonsense has been talked in relation to this subject. Some inventors have claimed the power to 'indefinitely divide' the electric current, not knowing or forgetting that such a statement is incompatible with the well-proven law of conservation of energy."
The views of scientists from that time on the topic are clearly illustrated by the following two excerpts. The first is from a lecture given in February 1879 at the Royal United Service Institution by Mr. (Sir) W. H. Preece, one of the leading electricians in England. After discussing the issue mathematically, he stated: "Thus, the subdivision of light is a complete illusion." The second excerpt comes from a book by Paget Higgs, LL.D., D.Sc., published in London in 1879, where he writes: "A lot of nonsense has been said about this topic. Some inventors have claimed the ability to 'indefinitely divide' the electric current, unaware or forgetting that such a claim contradicts the well-established law of conservation of energy."
"Some inventors," in the last sentence just quoted, probably—indeed, we think undoubtedly—refers to Edison, whose earlier work in electric lighting (1878) had been announced in this country and abroad, and who had then stated boldly his conviction of the practicability of the subdivision of the electrical current. The above extracts are good illustrations, however, of scientific opinions up to the end of 1879, when Mr. Edison's epoch-making invention rendered them entirely untenable. The eminent scientist, John Tyndall, while not sharing these precise views, at least as late as January 17, 1879, delivered a lecture before the Royal Institution on "The Electric Light," when, after pointing out the development of the art up to Edison's work, and showing the apparent hopelessness of the problem, he said: "Knowing something of the intricacy of the practical problem, I should certainly prefer seeing it in Edison's hands to having it in mine."
"Some inventors," in the last sentence just quoted, probably—indeed, we think undoubtedly—refers to Edison, whose earlier work in electric lighting (1878) had been announced in this country and abroad, and who had then stated boldly his belief in the feasibility of breaking down the electrical current. The above extracts are good examples of scientific opinions up to the end of 1879, when Mr. Edison’s groundbreaking invention made them completely invalid. The prominent scientist, John Tyndall, while not agreeing with these exact views, at least as late as January 17, 1879, gave a lecture at the Royal Institution on "The Electric Light," where, after discussing the advancements in the field up to Edison’s work and highlighting the apparent difficulties of the problem, he said: "Given my understanding of the complexity of the practical issue, I would certainly prefer it to be in Edison's hands rather than mine."
The reader may have deemed this sketch of the state of the art to be a considerable digression; but it is certainly due to the subject to present the facts in such a manner as to show that this great invention was neither the result of improving some process or device that was known or existing at the time, nor due to any unforeseen lucky chance, nor the accidental result of other experiments. On the contrary, it was the legitimate outcome of a series of exhaustive experiments founded upon logical and original reasoning in a mind that had the courage and hardihood to set at naught the confirmed opinions of the world, voiced by those generally acknowledged to be the best exponents of the art—experiments carried on amid a storm of jeers and derision, almost as contemptuous as if the search were for the discovery of perpetual motion. In this we see the man foreshadowed by the boy who, when he obtained his books on chemistry or physics, did not accept any statement of fact or experiment therein, but worked out every one of them himself to ascertain whether or not they were true.
The reader might think this overview of the current state of the art is quite a digression; however, it's important to present the facts in a way that makes it clear this groundbreaking invention didn't come from improving an existing process or device, nor was it a result of any lucky chance or random outcomes from other experiments. Instead, it was the genuine result of numerous thorough experiments based on logical and original reasoning, coming from a mind brave enough to disregard the established views of the time, as expressed by those widely considered the best experts in the field—experiments conducted amidst a flurry of mockery and scorn, almost as if searching for perpetual motion. In this, we see the adult reflected in the boy who, when he got his chemistry or physics books, didn't just take any statement of fact or experiment at face value but tested each one himself to find out if they were true.
Although this brings the reader up to the year 1879, one must turn back two years and accompany Edison in his first attack on the electric-light problem. In 1877 he sold his telephone invention (the carbon transmitter) to the Western Union Telegraph Company, which had previously come into possession also of his quadruplex inventions, as already related. He was still busily engaged on the telephone, on acoustic electrical transmission, sextuplex telegraphs, duplex telegraphs, miscellaneous carbon articles, and other inventions of a minor nature. During the whole of the previous year and until late in the summer of 1877, he had been working with characteristic energy and enthusiasm on the telephone; and, in developing this invention to a successful issue, had preferred the use of carbon and had employed it in numerous forms, especially in the form of carbonized paper.
Although this brings the reader up to the year 1879, we need to go back two years and follow Edison in his initial attempt to solve the electric-light issue. In 1877, he sold his telephone invention (the carbon transmitter) to the Western Union Telegraph Company, which had also previously acquired his quadruplex inventions, as mentioned before. He was still actively working on the telephone, acoustic electrical transmission, sextuplex telegraphs, duplex telegraphs, various carbon products, and other minor inventions. Throughout the previous year and until late summer 1877, he had been working with his usual energy and enthusiasm on the telephone; in the development of this invention, he favored the use of carbon and had worked with it in many forms, especially carbonized paper.
Eighteen hundred and seventy-seven in Edison's laboratory was a veritable carbon year, for it was carbon in some shape or form for interpolation in electric circuits of various kinds that occupied the thoughts of the whole force from morning to night. It is not surprising, therefore, that in September of that year, when Edison turned his thoughts actively toward electric lighting by incandescence, his early experiments should be in the line of carbon as an illuminant. His originality of method was displayed at the very outset, for one of the first experiments was the bringing to incandescence of a strip of carbon in the open air to ascertain merely how much current was required. This conductor was a strip of carbonized paper about an inch long, one-sixteenth of an inch broad, and six or seven one-thousandths of an inch thick, the ends of which were secured to clamps that formed the poles of a battery. The carbon was lighted up to incandescence, and, of course, oxidized and disintegrated immediately. Within a few days this was followed by experiments with the same kind of carbon, but in vacuo by means of a hand-worked air-pump. This time the carbon strip burned at incandescence for about eight minutes. Various expedients to prevent oxidization were tried, such, for instance, as coating the carbon with powdered glass, which in melting would protect the carbon from the atmosphere, but without successful results.
In 1877, Edison's lab was all about carbon, as it occupied everyone's thoughts from morning to night while working on electric circuits. So, it's no surprise that in September of that year, when Edison focused on electric lighting through incandescence, his initial experiments involved carbon as a light source. His unique approach was evident right from the start; one of the first experiments involved heating a strip of carbon in open air to figure out how much current it needed. This conductor was a strip of carbonized paper about an inch long, one-sixteenth of an inch wide, and six or seven thousandths of an inch thick, with the ends attached to clamps that connected to a battery. The carbon glowed bright but quickly oxidized and broke down. Just a few days later, he conducted more experiments with the same type of carbon, but in a vacuum using a hand-operated air pump. This time, the carbon strip burned brightly for about eight minutes. He tried various methods to prevent oxidation, like coating the carbon with powdered glass, which would melt and shield it from the air, but those attempts were unsuccessful.
Edison was inclined to concur in the prevailing opinion as to the easy destructibility of carbon, but, without actually settling the point in his mind, he laid aside temporarily this line of experiment and entered a new field. He had made previously some trials of platinum wire as an incandescent burner for a lamp, but left it for a time in favor of carbon. He now turned to the use of almost infusible metals—such as boron, ruthenium, chromium, etc.—as separators or tiny bridges between two carbon points, the current acting so as to bring these separators to a high degree of incandescence, at which point they would emit a brilliant light. He also placed some of these refractory metals directly in the circuit, bringing them to incandescence, and used silicon in powdered form in glass tubes placed in the electric circuit. His notes include the use of powdered silicon mixed with lime or other very infusible non-conductors or semi-conductors. Edison's conclusions on these substances were that, while in some respects they were within the bounds of possibility for the subdivision of the electric current, they did not reach the ideal that he had in mind for commercial results.
Edison tended to agree with the popular belief about how easily carbon could be destroyed, but without fully deciding on the matter, he temporarily set aside this line of experimentation and moved on to a new area. He had previously tested platinum wire as an incandescent burner for a lamp, but he had put that on hold in favor of carbon. Now, he focused on using nearly infusible metals—like boron, ruthenium, and chromium—as separators or small bridges between two carbon points, with the current causing these separators to heat up to a high intensity where they would emit a bright light. He also connected some of these heat-resistant metals directly in the circuit to glow and used powdered silicon in glass tubes within the electric circuit. His notes mentioned using powdered silicon mixed with lime or other very heat-resistant non-conductors or semi-conductors. Edison's findings about these materials were that, while in some ways they could potentially subdivide the electric current, they didn't meet the ideal results he envisioned for commercial use.
Edison's systematized attacks on the problem were two in number, the first of which we have just related, which began in September, 1877, and continued until about January, 1878. Contemporaneously, he and his force of men were very busily engaged day and night on other important enterprises and inventions. Among the latter, the phonograph may be specially mentioned, as it was invented in the late fall of 1877. From that time until July, 1878, his time and attention day and night were almost completely absorbed by the excitement caused by the invention and exhibition of the machine. In July, feeling entitled to a brief vacation after several years of continuous labor, Edison went with the expedition to Wyoming to observe an eclipse of the sun, and incidentally to test his tasimeter, a delicate instrument devised by him for measuring heat transmitted through immense distances of space. His trip has been already described. He was absent about two months. Coming home rested and refreshed, Mr. Edison says: "After my return from the trip to observe the eclipse of the sun, I went with Professor Barker, Professor of Physics in the University of Pennsylvania, and Doctor Chandler, Professor of Chemistry in Columbia College, to see Mr. Wallace, a large manufacturer of brass in Ansonia, Connecticut. Wallace at this time was experimenting on series arc lighting. Just at that time I wanted to take up something new, and Professor Barker suggested that I go to work and see if I could subdivide the electric light so it could be got in small units like gas. This was not a new suggestion, because I had made a number of experiments on electric lighting a year before this. They had been laid aside for the phonograph. I determined to take up the search again and continue it. On my return home I started my usual course of collecting every kind of data about gas; bought all the transactions of the gas-engineering societies, etc., all the back volumes of gas journals, etc. Having obtained all the data, and investigated gas-jet distribution in New York by actual observations, I made up my mind that the problem of the subdivision of the electric current could be solved and made commercial." About the end of August, 1878, he began his second organized attack on the subdivision of the current, which was steadily maintained until he achieved signal victory a year and two months later.
Edison's organized efforts to tackle the problem were two-fold. The first began in September 1877 and lasted until about January 1878. During this time, he and his team were busy day and night on other important projects and inventions. One significant invention from this period was the phonograph, which he created in late fall 1877. From then until July 1878, he was almost entirely focused on the excitement of inventing and showcasing the machine. In July, feeling that he deserved a short vacation after years of hard work, Edison joined an expedition to Wyoming to observe a solar eclipse, and also to test his tasimeter, a sensitive device he designed to measure heat transmitted over long distances. This trip has already been detailed. He was away for about two months. Upon returning home, rested and refreshed, Edison said: "After my trip to observe the solar eclipse, I went with Professor Barker, a Physics Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Chandler, a Chemistry Professor at Columbia College, to meet Mr. Wallace, a major brass manufacturer in Ansonia, Connecticut. At that time, Wallace was experimenting with series arc lighting. I wanted to tackle something new, and Professor Barker suggested that I try to subdivide electric light so it could be available in small units like gas. This wasn’t a completely new idea, as I had conducted several experiments on electric lighting a year earlier, but they had been set aside for the phonograph. I decided to resume that research and continue it. After getting back home, I started my usual process of collecting data about gas; I purchased all the proceedings of gas-engineering societies and back issues of gas journals. Having gathered all the information and studied gas-jet distribution in New York through actual observations, I became convinced that the problem of subdividing the electric current could be solved and turned into a commercial success." By the end of August 1878, he began his second organized effort to work on the subdivision of the current, which he steadily pursued until he achieved significant success a year and two months later.
The date of this interesting visit to Ansonia is fixed by an inscription made by Edison on a glass goblet which he used. The legend in diamond scratches runs: "Thomas A. Edison, September 8, 1878, made under the electric light." Other members of the party left similar memorials, which under the circumstances have come to be greatly prized. A number of experiments were witnessed in arc lighting, and Edison secured a small Wallace-Farmer dynamo for his own work, as well as a set of Wallace arc lamps for lighting the Menlo Park laboratory. Before leaving Ansonia, Edison remarked, significantly: "Wallace, I believe I can beat you making electric lights. I don't think you are working in the right direction." Another date which shows how promptly the work was resumed is October 14, 1878, when Edison filed an application for his first lighting patent: "Improvement in Electric Lights." In after years, discussing the work of Wallace, who was not only a great pioneer electrical manufacturer, but one of the founders of the wire-drawing and brass-working industry, Edison said: "Wallace was one of the earliest pioneers in electrical matters in this country. He has done a great deal of good work, for which others have received the credit; and the work which he did in the early days of electric lighting others have benefited by largely, and he has been crowded to one side and forgotten." Associated in all this work with Wallace at Ansonia was Prof. Moses G. Farmer, famous for the introduction of the fire-alarm system; as the discoverer of the self-exciting principle of the modern dynamo; as a pioneer experimenter in the electric-railway field; as a telegraph engineer, and as a lecturer on mines and explosives to naval classes at Newport. During 1858, Farmer, who, like Edison, was a ceaseless investigator, had made a series of studies upon the production of light by electricity, and had even invented an automatic regulator by which a number of platinum lamps in multiple arc could be kept at uniform voltage for any length of time. In July, 1859, he lit up one of the rooms of his house at Salem, Massachusetts, every evening with such lamps, using in them small pieces of platinum and iridium wire, which were made to incandesce by means of current from primary batteries. Farmer was not one of the party that memorable day in September, but his work was known through his intimate connection with Wallace, and there is no doubt that reference was made to it. Such work had not led very far, the "lamps" were hopelessly short-lived, and everything was obviously experimental; but it was all helpful and suggestive to one whose open mind refused no hint from any quarter.
The date of this intriguing visit to Ansonia is marked by an inscription made by Edison on a glass goblet he used. The engraving reads: "Thomas A. Edison, September 8, 1878, made under the electric light." Other members of the group left similar keepsakes, which have since become highly valued. Several experiments were conducted in arc lighting, and Edison got a small Wallace-Farmer dynamo for his own projects, along with a set of Wallace arc lamps to light the Menlo Park lab. Before leaving Ansonia, Edison noted, "Wallace, I believe I can outdo you in making electric lights. I don’t think you’re headed in the right direction." Another important date indicating how quickly work resumed is October 14, 1878, when Edison applied for his first lighting patent: "Improvement in Electric Lights." In later years, while discussing Wallace’s contributions, who was not only a significant early electrical manufacturer but also one of the founders of the wire-drawing and brass-working industry, Edison remarked: "Wallace was one of the first pioneers in electrical matters in this country. He has done a lot of great work, for which others have taken the credit; and the work he did in the early days of electric lighting has greatly benefited others, while he has been sidelined and forgotten." Working alongside Wallace at Ansonia was Prof. Moses G. Farmer, known for introducing the fire-alarm system; discovering the self-exciting principle of the modern dynamo; pioneering experiments in electric railways; serving as a telegraph engineer, and teaching mines and explosives to naval classes at Newport. During 1858, Farmer, like Edison, was a relentless investigator who conducted a series of studies on producing light with electricity and invented an automatic regulator that allowed multiple platinum lamps to maintain a uniform voltage for extended periods. In July 1859, he lit up a room in his house in Salem, Massachusetts, each evening with these lamps, using small pieces of platinum and iridium wire that glowed thanks to current from primary batteries. Farmer wasn’t part of the memorable group that day in September, but his work was known through his close ties with Wallace, and it’s clear that it was referenced. His work hadn’t progressed very far; the "lamps" were short-lived and everything was clearly experimental. However, it was all beneficial and illuminating to someone who was open-minded and welcomed insights from all sources.
At the commencement of his new attempts, Edison returned to his experiments with carbon as an incandescent burner for a lamp, and made a very large number of trials, all in vacuo. Not only were the ordinary strip paper carbons tried again, but tissue-paper coated with tar and lampblack was rolled into thin sticks, like knitting-needles, carbonized and raised to incandescence in vacuo. Edison also tried hard carbon, wood carbons, and almost every conceivable variety of paper carbon in like manner. With the best vacuum that he could then get by means of the ordinary air-pump, the carbons would last, at the most, only from ten to fifteen minutes in a state of incandescence. Such results were evidently not of commercial value.
At the start of his new efforts, Edison went back to experimenting with carbon as an incandescent element for a lamp and conducted a huge number of trials, all in vacuum. He not only revisited the usual strip paper carbons, but also rolled tissue paper coated with tar and lampblack into thin sticks, similar to knitting needles, which he carbonized and lit up in vacuum. Edison also experimented with hard carbon, wood carbons, and nearly every possible type of paper carbon in a similar way. With the best vacuum he could achieve using a standard air pump, the carbons would only last, at most, about ten to fifteen minutes while glowing. Clearly, such results had no commercial value.
Edison then turned his attention in other directions. In his earliest consideration of the problem of subdividing the electric current, he had decided that the only possible solution lay in the employment of a lamp whose incandescing body should have a high resistance combined with a small radiating surface, and be capable of being used in what is called "multiple arc," so that each unit, or lamp, could be turned on or off without interfering with any other unit or lamp. No other arrangement could possibly be considered as commercially practicable.
Edison then directed his focus elsewhere. In his initial exploration of the issue of splitting electric current, he concluded that the only viable solution was to use a lamp with a high resistance and a small radiating surface, which could operate in something known as "multiple arc." This setup would allow each unit, or lamp, to be turned on or off independently without affecting any other unit or lamp. No other arrangement could be seen as commercially feasible.
The full significance of the three last preceding sentences will not be obvious to laymen, as undoubtedly many of the readers of this book may be; and now being on the threshold of the series of Edison's experiments that led up to the basic invention, we interpolate a brief explanation, in order that the reader may comprehend the logical reasoning and work that in this case produced such far-reaching results.
The full significance of the last three sentences may not be clear to most readers, many of whom might not have a technical background. Now, as we begin the series of Edison's experiments that led to the groundbreaking invention, we’ll provide a brief explanation so that you can understand the logical reasoning and efforts that led to such impactful results.
If we consider a simple circuit in which a current is flowing, and include in the circuit a carbon horseshoe-like conductor which it is desired to bring to incandescence by the heat generated by the current passing through it, it is first evident that the resistance offered to the current by the wires themselves must be less than that offered by the burner, because, otherwise current would be wasted as heat in the conducting wires. At the very foundation of the electric-lighting art is the essentially commercial consideration that one cannot spend very much for conductors, and Edison determined that, in order to use wires of a practicable size, the voltage of the current (i.e., its pressure or the characteristic that overcomes resistance to its flow) should be one hundred and ten volts, which since its adoption has been the standard. To use a lower voltage or pressure, while making the solution of the lighting problem a simple one as we shall see, would make it necessary to increase the size of the conducting wires to a prohibitive extent. To increase the voltage or pressure materially, while permitting some saving in the cost of conductors, would enormously increase the difficulties of making a sufficiently high resistance conductor to secure light by incandescence. This apparently remote consideration —weight of copper used—was really the commercial key to the problem, just as the incandescent burner was the scientific key to that problem. Before Edison's invention incandescent lamps had been suggested as a possibility, but they were provided with carbon rods or strips of relatively low resistance, and to bring these to incandescence required a current of low pressure, because a current of high voltage would pass through them so readily as not to generate heat; and to carry a current of low pressure through wires without loss would require wires of enormous size. [8] Having a current of relatively high pressure to contend with, it was necessary to provide a carbon burner which, as compared with what had previously been suggested, should have a very great resistance. Carbon as a material, determined after patient search, apparently offered the greatest hope, but even with this substance the necessary high resistance could be obtained only by making the burner of extremely small cross-section, thereby also reducing its radiating surface. Therefore, the crucial point was the production of a hair-like carbon filament, with a relatively great resistance and small radiating surface, capable of withstanding mechanical shock, and susceptible of being maintained at a temperature of over two thousand degrees for a thousand hours or more before breaking. And this filamentary conductor required to be supported in a vacuum chamber so perfectly formed and constructed that during all those hours, and subjected as it is to varying temperatures, not a particle of air should enter to disintegrate the filament. And not only so, but the lamp after its design must not be a mere laboratory possibility, but a practical commercial article capable of being manufactured at low cost and in large quantities. A statement of what had to be done in those days of actual as well as scientific electrical darkness is quite sufficient to explain Tyndall's attitude of mind in preferring that the problem should be in Edison's hands rather than in his own. To say that the solution of the problem lay merely in reducing the size of the carbon burner to a mere hair, is to state a half-truth only; but who, we ask, would have had the temerity even to suggest that such an attenuated body could be maintained at a white heat, without disintegration, for a thousand hours? The solution consisted not only in that, but in the enormous mass of patiently worked-out details—the manufacture of the filaments, their uniform carbonization, making the globes, producing a perfect vacuum, and countless other factors, the omission of any one of which would probably have resulted eventually in failure.
If we look at a simple circuit with current flowing through it, and we include a carbon horseshoe-shaped conductor that we want to heat up until it glows, it's clear that the resistance from the wires must be less than the resistance from the burner. Otherwise, the current would be wasted as heat in the wires. At the core of electric lighting is the practical realization that you can't spend much on conductors, and Edison decided that to use wires of a reasonable size, the voltage should be one hundred and ten volts, which has since become the standard. Lowering the voltage would simplify the lighting problem but would require larger, prohibitively expensive wires. Conversely, increasing the voltage significantly would reduce conductor costs but would greatly complicate the need for a high-resistance conductor to create light through incandescence. This seemingly minor detail—the weight of the copper used—was actually the key commercial consideration, just as the incandescent burner was the scientific key. Before Edison's invention, incandescent lamps were merely proposed, using carbon rods or strips with low resistance. To heat these, a low-pressure current was necessary; a high-voltage current would pass too easily through them without generating heat, and using low-pressure current through wires without losing energy would require enormous wire sizes. Faced with the need for a relatively high-pressure current, a carbon burner with significantly high resistance was needed, differing from earlier suggestions. After extensive searching, carbon seemed to offer the best promise, but even this material required an extremely thin burner to achieve the necessary high resistance, which also meant reducing its heat-radiating surface. Thus, the essential task was to create a thin carbon filament with a relatively high resistance, a small surface area, able to survive mechanical stress, and capable of operating at over two thousand degrees for a thousand hours or more without breaking. This filament also needed to be housed in a vacuum chamber that was perfectly sealed to prevent any air from getting in and destroying it, even as it experienced temperature changes over time. Additionally, the lamp needed to be more than just a lab prototype; it had to be a viable commercial product that could be produced affordably and in large quantities. Understanding the challenges of that time—both practical and scientific—helps explain why Tyndall preferred to leave the problem in Edison's hands. Saying that the solution was just about making the carbon burner extremely thin is only part of the truth; who would have dared to suggest that such a fragile object could withstand white heat without breaking for a thousand hours? The solution involved a vast number of meticulously worked-out details—making the filaments, achieving uniform carbonization, creating the globes, obtaining a perfect vacuum, and many other factors, any of which, if neglected, could have led to failure.
[Footnote 8: As a practical illustration of these facts it was calculated by Professor Barker, of the University of Pennsylvania (after Edison had invented the incandescent lamp), that if it should cost $100,000 for copper conductors to supply current to Edison lamps in a given area, it would cost about $200,000,000 for copper conductors for lighting the same area by lamps of the earlier experimenters—such, for instance, as the lamp invented by Konn in 1875. This enormous difference would be accounted for by the fact that Edison's lamp was one having a high resistance and relatively small radiating surface, while Konn's lamp was one having a very low resistance and large radiating surface.]
[Footnote 8: As a practical example of these facts, Professor Barker from the University of Pennsylvania calculated (after Edison invented the incandescent lamp) that it would cost $100,000 for copper conductors to supply current to Edison lamps in a certain area. In contrast, it would cost about $200,000,000 for copper conductors to power lighting in that same area using lamps from earlier inventors—such as the lamp created by Konn in 1875. This huge difference is due to the fact that Edison's lamp had high resistance and a relatively small radiating surface, while Konn's lamp had very low resistance and a large radiating surface.]
Continuing the digression one step farther in order to explain the term "multiple arc," it may be stated that there are two principal systems of distributing electric current, one termed "series," and the other "multiple arc." The two are illustrated, diagrammatically, side by side, the arrows indicating flow of current. The series system, it will be seen, presents one continuous path for the current. The current for the last lamp must pass through the first and all the intermediate lamps. Hence, if any one light goes out, the continuity of the path is broken, current cannot flow, and all the lamps are extinguished unless a loop or by-path is provided. It is quite obvious that such a system would be commercially impracticable where small units, similar to gas jets, were employed. On the other hand, in the multiple-arc system, current may be considered as flowing in two parallel conductors like the vertical sides of a ladder, the ends of which never come together. Each lamp is placed in a separate circuit across these two conductors, like a rung in the ladder, thus making a separate and independent path for the current in each case. Hence, if a lamp goes out, only that individual subdivision, or ladder step, is affected; just that one particular path for the current is interrupted, but none of the other lamps is interfered with. They remain lighted, each one independent of the other. The reader will quite readily understand, therefore, that a multiple-arc system is the only one practically commercial where electric light is to be used in small units like those of gas or oil.
To further explain the term "multiple arc," it can be said that there are two main systems for distributing electric current: one is called "series," and the other "multiple arc." These two systems are shown in diagrams side by side, with arrows indicating the flow of current. The series system provides a single continuous path for the current. The current for the last lamp must pass through the first lamp and all the others in between. Therefore, if any one light goes out, the continuity of the path is broken, the current can't flow, and all the lamps go out unless there’s a loop or alternative route. It's clear that this system would not be practical in commercial settings where small units, similar to gas flames, are used. On the flip side, in the multiple-arc system, the current flows through two parallel conductors, like the vertical sides of a ladder that never meet. Each lamp is connected in its own separate circuit across these two conductors, like a rung on the ladder, creating a unique and independent path for the current for each lamp. So, if one lamp goes out, only that specific section is affected; just that one path for the current gets interrupted, but the other lamps remain lit, each functioning independently. It’s easy to see that the multiple-arc system is the only practically viable option for using electric lights in small units like gas or oil lamps.
Such was the nature of the problem that confronted Edison at the outset. There was nothing in the whole world that in any way approximated a solution, although the most brilliant minds in the electrical art had been assiduously working on the subject for a quarter of a century preceding. As already seen, he came early to the conclusion that the only solution lay in the use of a lamp of high resistance and small radiating surface, and, with characteristic fervor and energy, he attacked the problem from this standpoint, having absolute faith in a successful outcome. The mere fact that even with the successful production of the electric lamp the assault on the complete problem of commercial lighting would hardly be begun did not deter him in the slightest. To one of Edison's enthusiastic self-confidence the long vista of difficulties ahead—we say it in all sincerity—must have been alluring.
Edison faced a huge challenge from the very beginning. There was nothing in the world that even came close to a solution, despite the most brilliant minds in electrical engineering working on it for the past twenty-five years. As mentioned earlier, he quickly realized that the only answer lay in using a lamp with high resistance and a small radiating surface, and with his typical passion and energy, he approached the problem from this angle, completely confident it would work out. The fact that even after creating the electric lamp, tackling the complete issue of commercial lighting would barely have begun didn’t discourage him at all. To someone as enthusiastically self-assured as Edison, the long road of challenges ahead must have seemed exciting.
After having devoted several months to experimental trials of carbon, at the end of 1878, as already detailed, he turned his attention to the platinum group of metals and began a series of experiments in which he used chiefly platinum wire and iridium wire, and alloys of refractory metals in the form of wire burners for incandescent lamps. These metals have very high fusing-points, and were found to last longer than the carbon strips previously used when heated up to incandescence by the electric current, although under such conditions as were then possible they were melted by excess of current after they had been lighted a comparatively short time, either in the open air or in such a vacuum as could be obtained by means of the ordinary air-pump.
After spending several months experimenting with carbon, at the end of 1878, as previously explained, he shifted his focus to the platinum group of metals and started a series of experiments primarily using platinum wire and iridium wire, along with alloys of refractory metals in the form of wire burners for incandescent lamps. These metals have extremely high melting points and were found to last longer than the carbon strips that were used before when heated to incandescence by the electric current. However, under the conditions that were possible at the time, they were melted by excessive current after being lit for a relatively short period, whether in open air or in a vacuum achievable with a standard air pump.
Nevertheless, Edison continued along this line of experiment with unremitting vigor, making improvement after improvement, until about April, 1879, he devised a means whereby platinum wire of a given length, which would melt in the open air when giving a light equal to four candles, would emit a light of twenty-five candle-power without fusion. This was accomplished by introducing the platinum wire into an all-glass globe, completely sealed and highly exhausted of air, and passing a current through the platinum wire while the vacuum was being made. In this, which was a new and radical invention, we see the first step toward the modern incandescent lamp. The knowledge thus obtained that current passing through the platinum during exhaustion would drive out occluded gases (i.e., gases mechanically held in or upon the metal), and increase the infusibility of the platinum, led him to aim at securing greater perfection in the vacuum, on the theory that the higher the vacuum obtained, the higher would be the infusibility of the platinum burner. And this fact also was of the greatest importance in making successful the final use of carbon, because without the subjection of the carbon to the heating effect of current during the formation of the vacuum, the presence of occluded gases would have been a fatal obstacle.
Despite this, Edison persisted with his experiments tirelessly, making one improvement after another, until around April 1879, he developed a method where a specific length of platinum wire, which would melt in open air when producing light equal to four candles, could emit a light of twenty-five candle-power without melting. He achieved this by placing the platinum wire in a completely sealed, all-glass globe that was highly vacuumed, and running a current through the platinum wire while the vacuum was created. This marked a new and groundbreaking invention, representing the first step toward the modern incandescent lamp. The insight he gained that passing a current through the platinum during the evacuation process would eliminate trapped gases (that is, gases mechanically held in or on the metal) and enhance the platinum's resistance to melting led him to strive for greater perfection in the vacuum. His theory was that a higher vacuum would result in a higher resistance to melting of the platinum burner. This discovery was also crucial for the successful use of carbon, because without exposing the carbon to the heating effect of the current during the vacuum formation, the presence of trapped gases would have posed a significant barrier.
Continuing these experiments with most fervent zeal, taking no account of the passage of time, with an utter disregard for meals, and but scanty hours of sleep snatched reluctantly at odd periods of the day or night, Edison kept his laboratory going without cessation. A great variety of lamps was made of the platinum-iridium type, mostly with thermal devices to regulate the temperature of the burner and prevent its being melted by an excess of current. The study of apparatus for obtaining more perfect vacua was unceasingly carried on, for Edison realized that in this there lay a potent factor of ultimate success. About August he had obtained a pump that would produce a vacuum up to about the one-hundred-thousandth part of an atmosphere, and some time during the next month, or beginning of October, had obtained one that would produce a vacuum up to the one-millionth part of an atmosphere. It must be remembered that the conditions necessary for MAINTAINING this high vacuum were only made possible by his invention of the one-piece all-glass globe, in which all the joints were hermetically sealed during its manufacture into a lamp, whereby a high vacuum could be retained continuously for any length of time.
Continuing these experiments with intense enthusiasm, ignoring the passing time, neglecting meals, and grabbing only a few hours of sleep at odd times throughout the day or night, Edison kept his laboratory running nonstop. A wide range of lamps was created from the platinum-iridium type, mostly equipped with thermal devices to control the burner’s temperature and prevent it from melting due to too much current. The pursuit of better vacuum technology was relentless, as Edison understood that this was a key factor for ultimate success. Around August, he secured a pump that could create a vacuum of about one-hundred-thousandth of an atmosphere, and sometime in the following month, or early October, he obtained one that could achieve a vacuum of one-millionth of an atmosphere. It's important to note that the conditions necessary to MAINTAIN this high vacuum were only made feasible by his invention of the one-piece all-glass globe, in which all the joints were hermetically sealed during its manufacturing into a lamp, allowing a high vacuum to be held continuously for any extended period.
In obtaining this perfection of vacuum apparatus, Edison realized that he was approaching much nearer to a solution of the problem. In his experiments with the platinum-iridium lamps, he had been working all the time toward the proposition of high resistance and small radiating surface, until he had made a lamp having thirty feet of fine platinum wire wound upon a small bobbin of infusible material; but the desired economy, simplicity, and durability were not obtained in this manner, although at all times the burner was maintained at a critically high temperature. After attaining a high degree of perfection with these lamps, he recognized their impracticable character, and his mind reverted to the opinion he had formed in his early experiments two years before—viz., that carbon had the requisite resistance to permit a very simple conductor to accomplish the object if it could be used in the form of a hair-like "filament," provided the filament itself could be made sufficiently homogeneous. As we have already seen, he could not use carbon successfully in his earlier experiments, for the strips of carbon he then employed, although they were much larger than "filaments," would not stand, but were consumed in a few minutes under the imperfect conditions then at his command.
In achieving the ideal vacuum apparatus, Edison understood that he was getting much closer to solving the problem. In his experiments with the platinum-iridium lamps, he consistently aimed for a high resistance and small radiating surface, ultimately creating a lamp with thirty feet of fine platinum wire wrapped around a small bobbin of non-melting material. However, he did not achieve the desired efficiency, simplicity, and durability this way, even though the burner was kept at an extremely high temperature. After reaching a high level of refinement with these lamps, he acknowledged their impractical nature, and his thoughts returned to the conclusion he had drawn in his early experiments two years earlier—that carbon had the necessary resistance to allow for a very simple conductor to serve the purpose if it could be fashioned into a hair-like "filament," assuming the filament could be made sufficiently uniform. As we have already noted, he was unable to use carbon effectively in his earlier experiments since the carbon strips he used, although much larger than "filaments," could not withstand the conditions and would burn out within a few minutes under the inadequate circumstances he faced at that time.
Now, however, that he had found means for obtaining and maintaining high vacua, Edison immediately went back to carbon, which from the first he had conceived of as the ideal substance for a burner. His next step proved conclusively the correctness of his old deductions. On October 21, 1879, after many patient trials, he carbonized a piece of cotton sewing-thread bent into a loop or horseshoe form, and had it sealed into a glass globe from which he exhausted the air until a vacuum up to one-millionth of an atmosphere was produced. This lamp, when put on the circuit, lighted up brightly to incandescence and maintained its integrity for over forty hours, and lo! the practical incandescent lamp was born. The impossible, so called, had been attained; subdivision of the electric-light current was made practicable; the goal had been reached; and one of the greatest inventions of the century was completed. Up to this time Edison had spent over $40,000 in his electric-light experiments, but the results far more than justified the expenditure, for with this lamp he made the discovery that the FILAMENT of carbon, under the conditions of high vacuum, was commercially stable and would stand high temperatures without the disintegration and oxidation that took place in all previous attempts that he knew of for making an incandescent burner out of carbon. Besides, this lamp possessed the characteristics of high resistance and small radiating surface, permitting economy in the outlay for conductors, and requiring only a small current for each unit of light—conditions that were absolutely necessary of fulfilment in order to accomplish commercially the subdivision of the electric-light current.
Now that he had figured out how to create and maintain high vacuums, Edison quickly returned to carbon, which he had always believed to be the perfect material for a light bulb. His next experiment proved that his earlier ideas were correct. On October 21, 1879, after many careful trials, he carbonized a piece of cotton sewing thread shaped into a loop, sealing it inside a glass globe that he evacuated to create a vacuum of one-millionth of an atmosphere. When he connected this lamp to the circuit, it lit up brightly and stayed lit for over forty hours, and just like that, the practical incandescent lamp was created. The so-called impossible had been achieved; it became feasible to divide the electric light current; the objective was met, and one of the greatest inventions of the century was complete. Up to this point, Edison had invested over $40,000 in his electric light experiments, but the results justified the expense many times over. With this lamp, he discovered that the carbon FILAMENT, in a high vacuum, was commercially stable and could withstand high temperatures without breaking down or oxidizing, which had been an issue in all previous attempts he knew of to create a carbon light bulb. Additionally, this lamp had high resistance and a small radiating surface, which allowed for cost-effective wiring and only required a small current for each unit of light—conditions that were essential for successfully commercializing the subdivision of the electric light current.
This slender, fragile, tenuous thread of brittle carbon, glowing steadily and continuously with a soft light agreeable to the eyes, was the tiny key that opened the door to a world revolutionized in its interior illumination. It was a triumphant vindication of Edison's reasoning powers, his clear perceptions, his insight into possibilities, and his inventive faculty, all of which had already been productive of so many startling, practical, and epoch-making inventions. And now he had stepped over the threshold of a new art which has since become so world-wide in its application as to be an integral part of modern human experience. [9]
This slim, delicate, fragile thread of brittle carbon, glowing steadily and continuously with a soft light that's easy on the eyes, was the small key that unlocked a world transformed by its interior lighting. It was a triumphant confirmation of Edison's reasoning skills, his clear understanding, his insight into possibilities, and his inventive talent, all of which had already led to so many impressive, practical, and groundbreaking inventions. Now he had crossed into a new field that has since become so widespread in its application that it is an essential part of modern human life. [9]
[Footnote 9: The following extract from Walker on Patents (4th edition) will probably be of interest to the reader: "Sec. 31a. A meritorious exception, to the rule of the last section, is involved in the adjudicated validity of the Edison incandescent-light patent. The carbon filament, which constitutes the only new part of the combination of the second claim of that patent, differs from the earlier carbon burners of Sawyer and Man, only in having a diameter of one- sixty-fourth of an inch or less, whereas the burners of Sawyer and Man had a diameter of one-thirty-second of an inch or more. But that reduction of one-half in diameter increased the resistance of the burner FOURFOLD, and reduced its radiating surface TWOFOLD, and thus increased eightfold, its ratio of resistance to radiating surface. That eightfold increase of proportion enabled the resistance of the conductor of electricity from the generator to the burner to be increased eightfold, without any increase of percentage of loss of energy in that conductor, or decrease of percentage of development of heat in the burner; and thus enabled the area of the cross-section of that conductor to be reduced eightfold, and thus to be made with one-eighth of the amount of copper or other metal, which would be required if the reduction of diameter of the burner from one-thirty- second to one-sixty-fourth of an inch had not been made. And that great reduction in the size and cost of conductors, involved also a great difference in the composition of the electric energy employed in the system; that difference consisting in generating the necessary amount of electrical energy with comparatively high electromotive force, and comparatively low current, instead of contrariwise. For this reason, the use of carbon filaments, one-sixty-fourth of an inch in diameter or less, instead of carbon burners one- thirty-second of an inch in diameter or more, not only worked an enormous economy in conductors, but also necessitated a great change in generators, and did both according to a philosophy, which Edison was the first to know, and which is stated in this paragraph in its simplest form and aspect, and which lies at the foundation of the incandescent electric lighting of the world."]
[Footnote 9: The following extract from Walker on Patents (4th edition) will probably be of interest to the reader: "Sec. 31a. A significant exception to the rule from the last section is found in the confirmed validity of the Edison incandescent-light patent. The carbon filament, which is the only new element in the combination of the second claim of that patent, differs from the earlier carbon burners of Sawyer and Man only in that it has a diameter of one-sixty-fourth of an inch or less, while the burners of Sawyer and Man were one-thirty-second of an inch or larger. However, this reduction in diameter by half increased the resistance of the burner fourfold and decreased its radiating surface twofold, resulting in an eightfold increase in its resistance-to-radiating surface ratio. This eightfold increase allowed the resistance of the conductor carrying electricity from the generator to the burner to be increased eightfold without raising the percentage of energy loss in that conductor or decreasing the heat output in the burner. Consequently, this enabled the cross-section area of that conductor to be reduced by eight times, requiring only one-eighth the amount of copper or other metal that would have been needed if the diameter of the burner had not been reduced from one-thirty-second to one-sixty-fourth of an inch. This significant reduction in the size and cost of conductors also led to a major change in the composition of the electrical energy used in the system. This change involved generating the necessary electrical energy with relatively high voltage and relatively low current, rather than the opposite. For this reason, using carbon filaments that are one-sixty-fourth of an inch in diameter or smaller, instead of carbon burners that are one-thirty-second of an inch in diameter or larger, not only resulted in substantial cost savings for conductors but also required a significant change in generators. Both were based on a principle that Edison was the first to understand, which is explained in this paragraph in its simplest form and aspect, and which underpins the incandescent electric lighting system globally."]
No sooner had the truth of this new principle been established than the work to establish it firmly and commercially was carried on more assiduously than ever. The next immediate step was a further investigation of the possibilities of improving the quality of the carbon filament. Edison had previously made a vast number of experiments with carbonized paper for various electrical purposes, with such good results that he once more turned to it and now made fine filament-like loops of this material which were put into other lamps. These proved even more successful (commercially considered) than the carbonized thread—so much so that after a number of such lamps had been made and put through severe tests, the manufacture of lamps from these paper carbons was begun and carried on continuously. This necessitated first the devising and making of a large number of special tools for cutting the carbon filaments and for making and putting together the various parts of the lamps. Meantime, great excitement had been caused in this country and in Europe by the announcement of Edison's success. In the Old World, scientists generally still declared the impossibility of subdividing the electric-light current, and in the public press Mr. Edison was denounced as a dreamer. Other names of a less complimentary nature were applied to him, even though his lamp were actually in use, and the principle of commercial incandescent lighting had been established.
As soon as the truth of this new principle was established, the effort to solidify it both effectively and commercially intensified like never before. The next step was to further investigate ways to enhance the quality of the carbon filament. Edison had previously conducted numerous experiments with carbonized paper for various electrical purposes, achieving such good results that he decided to revisit it and created fine filament-like loops from this material to use in other lamps. These were even more commercially successful than the carbonized thread—so much so that after producing several such lamps and putting them through rigorous tests, the production of lamps made from these paper carbons began and continued steadily. This required devising and manufacturing many special tools for cutting the carbon filaments and assembling the various parts of the lamps. In the meantime, there was a tremendous buzz in this country and in Europe over the announcement of Edison's success. In Europe, scientists generally still claimed it was impossible to subdivide the electric light current, and the media labeled Mr. Edison a dreamer. Even less flattering names were used to describe him, despite the fact that his lamp was in actual use and the principle of commercial incandescent lighting had been established.
Between October 21, 1879, and December 21, 1879, some hundreds of these paper-carbon lamps had been made and put into actual use, not only in the laboratory, but in the streets and several residences at Menlo Park, New Jersey, causing great excitement and bringing many visitors from far and near. On the latter date a full-page article appeared in the New York Herald which so intensified the excited feeling that Mr. Edison deemed it advisable to make a public exhibition. On New Year's Eve, 1879, special trains were run to Menlo Park by the Pennsylvania Railroad, and over three thousand persons took advantage of the opportunity to go out there and witness this demonstration for themselves. In this great crowd were many public officials and men of prominence in all walks of life, who were enthusiastic in their praises.
Between October 21, 1879, and December 21, 1879, hundreds of these paper-carbon lamps were made and put into use, not just in the lab but also in the streets and several homes in Menlo Park, New Jersey. This sparked a lot of excitement and attracted many visitors from near and far. On December 21, a full-page article appeared in the New York Herald, which heightened the excitement even more, prompting Mr. Edison to arrange a public demonstration. On New Year's Eve, 1879, special trains were operated to Menlo Park by the Pennsylvania Railroad, and over three thousand people seized the chance to see this demonstration for themselves. Among the huge crowd were many public officials and prominent individuals from various fields, all singing praises.
In the mean time, the mind that conceived and made practical this invention could not rest content with anything less than perfection, so far as it could be realized. Edison was not satisfied with paper carbons. They were not fully up to the ideal that he had in mind. What he sought was a perfectly uniform and homogeneous carbon, one like the "One-Hoss Shay," that had no weak spots to break down at inopportune times. He began to carbonize everything in nature that he could lay hands on. In his laboratory note-books are innumerable jottings of the things that were carbonized and tried, such as tissue-paper, soft paper, all kinds of cardboards, drawing-paper of all grades, paper saturated with tar, all kinds of threads, fish-line, threads rubbed with tarred lampblack, fine threads plaited together in strands, cotton soaked in boiling tar, lamp-wick, twine, tar and lampblack mixed with a proportion of lime, vulcanized fibre, celluloid, boxwood, cocoanut hair and shell, spruce, hickory, baywood, cedar and maple shavings, rosewood, punk, cork, bagging, flax, and a host of other things. He also extended his searches far into the realms of nature in the line of grasses, plants, canes, and similar products, and in these experiments at that time and later he carbonized, made into lamps, and tested no fewer than six thousand different species of vegetable growths.
In the meantime, the mind that came up with and made this invention practical couldn't settle for anything less than perfection as much as possible. Edison wasn't happy with paper carbons; they didn't meet the ideal he had in mind. What he wanted was a perfectly uniform and consistent carbon, like the "One-Hoss Shay," with no weak points that would fail at inconvenient times. He started carbonizing everything in nature he could get his hands on. His laboratory notebooks are filled with countless notes on the items he carbonized and tested, including tissue paper, soft paper, various types of cardboard, drawing paper of all kinds, paper soaked in tar, all sorts of threads, fishing line, threads coated with tarred lampblack, fine threads woven together in strands, cotton soaked in boiling tar, lamp wick, twine, a mix of tar and lampblack with some lime, vulcanized fiber, celluloid, boxwood, coconut hair and shell, spruce, hickory, baywood, cedar and maple shavings, rosewood, punk, cork, bagging, flax, and many other materials. He also expanded his search deep into nature, experimenting with grasses, plants, canes, and similar products, and during those experiments, both then and later, he carbonized, created lamps from, and tested no less than six thousand different species of plant life.
The reasons for such prodigious research are not apparent on the face of the subject, nor is this the occasion to enter into an explanation, as that alone would be sufficient to fill a fair-sized book. Suffice it to say that Edison's omnivorous reading, keen observation, power of assimilating facts and natural phenomena, and skill in applying the knowledge thus attained to whatever was in hand, now came into full play in determining that the results he desired could only be obtained in certain directions.
The reasons for such extensive research aren't obvious at first glance, and this isn't the time to explain, as that alone could fill a decent-sized book. It's enough to say that Edison's broad reading, sharp observation, ability to gather facts about natural phenomena, and skill in applying the knowledge gained to whatever he was working on were all fully utilized in figuring out that the results he wanted could only be achieved in certain ways.
At this time he was investigating everything with a microscope, and one day in the early part of 1880 he noticed upon a table in the laboratory an ordinary palm-leaf fan. He picked it up and, looking it over, observed that it had a binding rim made of bamboo, cut from the outer edge of the cane; a very long strip. He examined this, and then gave it to one of his assistants, telling him to cut it up and get out of it all the filaments he could, carbonize them, put them into lamps, and try them. The results of this trial were exceedingly successful, far better than with anything else thus far used; indeed, so much so, that after further experiments and microscopic examinations Edison was convinced that he was now on the right track for making a thoroughly stable, commercial lamp; and shortly afterward he sent a man to Japan to procure further supplies of bamboo. The fascinating story of the bamboo hunt will be told later; but even this bamboo lamp was only one item of a complete system to be devised—a system that has since completely revolutionized the art of interior illumination.
At this point, he was inspecting everything with a microscope, and one day in early 1880, he noticed an ordinary palm-leaf fan on a table in the lab. He picked it up and, after examining it, noticed that it had a binding rim made of bamboo, cut from the outer edge of the cane; it was a very long strip. He looked it over and then handed it to one of his assistants, instructing him to cut it up, extract all the filaments, carbonize them, and test them in lamps. The results of this experiment were incredibly successful, much better than anything else used up to that point; in fact, they were so promising that after further tests and microscopic studies, Edison became convinced he was on the right path to creating a stable, commercial lamp. Soon after, he sent someone to Japan to gather more bamboo supplies. The intriguing story of the bamboo search will be shared later; however, this bamboo lamp was just one part of a complete system being developed—a system that has since completely transformed the art of indoor lighting.
Reference has been made in this chapter to the preliminary study that Edison brought to bear on the development of the gas art and industry. This study was so exhaustive that one can only compare it to the careful investigation made in advance by any competent war staff of the elements of strength and weakness, on both sides, in a possible campaign. A popular idea of Edison that dies hard, pictures a breezy, slap-dash, energetic inventor arriving at new results by luck and intuition, making boastful assertions and then winning out by mere chance. The native simplicity of the man, the absence of pose and ceremony, do much to strengthen this notion; but the real truth is that while gifted with unusual imagination, Edison's march to the goal of a new invention is positively humdrum and monotonous in its steady progress. No one ever saw Edison in a hurry; no one ever saw him lazy; and that which he did with slow, careful scrutiny six months ago, he will be doing with just as much calm deliberation of research six months hence—and six years hence if necessary. If, for instance, he were asked to find the most perfect pebble on the Atlantic shore of New Jersey, instead of hunting here, there, and everywhere for the desired object, we would no doubt find him patiently screening the entire beach, sifting out the most perfect stones and eventually, by gradual exclusion, reaching the long-sought-for pebble; and the mere fact that in this search years might be taken, would not lessen his enthusiasm to the slightest extent.
This chapter refers to the preliminary study that Edison conducted for the development of the gas industry. This study was so thorough that it can only be compared to the careful planning done by a competent military staff assessing strengths and weaknesses on both sides in a potential campaign. A common perception of Edison that persists is that he was a breezy, haphazard, energetic inventor who stumbled upon new results by luck and intuition, making grand claims and succeeding by sheer chance. The man's natural simplicity and lack of pretense contribute to this belief; however, the truth is that while he possessed extraordinary imagination, Edison’s journey toward a new invention was methodical and steady. No one ever saw Edison in a rush; no one ever saw him being lazy. What he studied with slow, careful attention six months ago, he would still be engaged in with the same thoughtful research six months later—and even six years later if needed. For instance, if he were tasked with finding the perfect pebble on the New Jersey Atlantic shore, instead of frantically searching everywhere for it, we would likely find him patiently screening the entire beach, sorting through the most perfect stones, and eventually, through systematic elimination, discovering the long-sought pebble. The fact that this search might take years would not dampen his enthusiasm in the slightest.
In the "prospectus book" among the series of famous note-books, all the references and data apply to gas. The book is numbered 184, falls into the period now dealt with, and runs along casually with items spread out over two or three years. All these notes refer specifically to "Electricity vs. Gas as General Illuminants," and cover an astounding range of inquiry and comment. One of the very first notes tells the whole story: "Object, Edison to effect exact imitation of all done by gas, so as to replace lighting by gas by lighting by electricity. To improve the illumination to such an extent as to meet all requirements of natural, artificial, and commercial conditions." A large programme, but fully executed! The notes, it will be understood, are all in Edison's handwriting. They go on to observe that "a general system of distribution is the only possible means of economical illumination," and they dismiss isolated-plant lighting as in mills and factories as of so little importance to the public—"we shall leave the consideration of this out of this book." The shrewd prophecy is made that gas will be manufactured less for lighting, as the result of electrical competition, and more and more for heating, etc., thus enlarging its market and increasing its income. Comment is made on kerosene and its cost, and all kinds of general statistics are jotted down as desirable. Data are to be obtained on lamp and dynamo efficiency, and "Another review of the whole thing as worked out upon pure science principles by Rowland, Young, Trowbridge; also Rowland on the possibilities and probabilities of cheaper production by better manufacture—higher incandescence without decrease of life of lamps." Notes are also made on meters and motors. "It doesn't matter if electricity is used for light or for power"; while small motors, it is observed, can be used night or day, and small steam-engines are inconvenient. Again the shrewd comment: "Generally poorest district for light, best for power, thus evening up whole city—the effect of this on investment."
In the "prospectus book" within the series of well-known notebooks, all the references and data are related to gas. The book is numbered 184, corresponds to the time period currently in focus, and casually covers topics spread over two or three years. All these notes specifically discuss "Electricity vs. Gas as General Illuminants," and encompass an impressive range of investigation and commentary. One of the very first notes reveals the entire objective: "Goal, Edison aims to replicate everything gas does, to replace gas lighting with electric lighting. To enhance the illumination to such a level that it meets all requirements of natural, artificial, and commercial conditions." It's an ambitious plan, and it was fully realized! The notes, as you'd expect, are all in Edison's handwriting. They continue to point out that "a general distribution system is the only feasible method for economical lighting," and they dismiss isolated lighting setups, like those in mills and factories, as too insignificant for the public—"we shall exclude this consideration from this book." A sharp prediction is made that gas will be produced less for lighting due to electrical competition and more for heating, etc., thereby expanding its market and boosting its revenue. Remarks are made about kerosene and its cost, along with various general statistics that are noted as desirable. They plan to gather data on lamp and dynamo efficiency, and "Another review of the entire situation based on pure science principles by Rowland, Young, Trowbridge; also Rowland's insights on the potential for cheaper production through better manufacturing—higher incandescence without reducing lamp lifespan." Notes are also made about meters and motors. "It doesn’t matter if electricity is used for lighting or for power"; it’s noted that small motors can operate day or night, while small steam engines are cumbersome. Again, the astute observation: "Generally, the poorest areas for lighting are the best for power, thus balancing the whole city—the impact of this on investment."
It is pointed out that "Previous inventions failed—necessities for commercial success and accomplishment by Edison. Edison's great effort—not to make a large light or a blinding light, but a small light having the mildness of gas." Curves are then called for of iron and copper investment—also energy line—curves of candle-power and electromotive force; curves on motors; graphic representation of the consumption of gas January to December; tables and formulae; representations graphically of what one dollar will buy in different kinds of light; "table, weight of copper required different distance, 100-ohm lamp, 16 candles"; table with curves showing increased economy by larger engine, higher power, etc. There is not much that is dilettante about all this. Note is made of an article in April, 1879, putting the total amount of gas investment in the whole world at that time at $1,500,000,000; which is now (1910) about the amount of the electric-lighting investment in the United States. Incidentally a note remarks: "So unpleasant is the effect of the products of gas that in the new Madison Square Theatre every gas jet is ventilated by special tubes to carry away the products of combustion." In short, there is no aspect of the new problem to which Edison failed to apply his acutest powers; and the speed with which the new system was worked out and introduced was simply due to his initial mastery of all the factors in the older art. Luther Stieringer, an expert gas engineer and inventor, whose services were early enlisted, once said that Edison knew more about gas than any other man he had ever met. The remark is an evidence of the kind of preparation Edison gave himself for his new task.
It is noted that "Previous inventions failed—necessities for commercial success and achievement by Edison. Edison's major goal was not to create a large or blinding light, but a small light that had the softness of gas." Curves are then requested for iron and copper investment—along with energy line—curves of candlepower and electromotive force; curves for motors; a graphic representation of gas consumption from January to December; tables and formulas; graphical representations of what one dollar will buy in different types of light; "table, weight of copper required for different distances, 100-ohm lamp, 16 candles"; a table with curves showing greater efficiency with larger engines, higher power, etc. There isn’t much that seems amateurish about all this. It’s noted that an article from April 1879 estimated the total global gas investment at that time to be $1,500,000,000; which is now (1910) approximately the amount of electric lighting investment in the United States. Incidentally, a note mentions: "So unpleasant is the effect of gas products that in the new Madison Square Theatre, every gas jet is ventilated by special tubes to carry away combustion byproducts." In short, there is no aspect of the new challenge that Edison didn’t address with his sharpest abilities; and the speed with which the new system was developed and implemented was simply due to his initial understanding of all the factors in the older technology. Luther Stieringer, an expert gas engineer and inventor who was recruited early on, once remarked that Edison knew more about gas than anyone else he had ever met. This comment reflects the level of preparation Edison undertook for his new endeavor.
CHAPTER XII
MEMORIES OF MENLO PARK
FROM the spring of 1876 to 1886 Edison lived and did his work at Menlo Park; and at this stage of the narrative, midway in that interesting and eventful period, it is appropriate to offer a few notes and jottings on the place itself, around which tradition is already weaving its fancies, just as at the time the outpouring of new inventions from it invested the name with sudden prominence and with the glamour of romance. "In 1876 I moved," says Edison, "to Menlo Park, New Jersey, on the Pennsylvania Railroad, several miles below Elizabeth. The move was due to trouble I had about rent. I had rented a small shop in Newark, on the top floor of a padlock factory, by the month. I gave notice that I would give it up at the end of the month, paid the rent, moved out, and delivered the keys. Shortly afterward I was served with a paper, probably a judgment, wherein I was to pay nine months' rent. There was some law, it seems, that made a monthly renter liable for a year. This seemed so unjust that I determined to get out of a place that permitted such injustice." For several Sundays he walked through different parts of New Jersey with two of his assistants before he decided on Menlo Park. The change was a fortunate one, for the inventor had married Miss Mary E. Stillwell, and was now able to establish himself comfortably with his wife and family while enjoying immediate access to the new laboratory. Every moment thus saved was valuable.
FROM the spring of 1876 to 1886, Edison lived and worked in Menlo Park; and at this point in the story, midway through this interesting and eventful period, it's appropriate to share a few notes and reflections on the place itself, around which tradition is already spinning its tales, just as the surge of new inventions from there brought sudden fame and a sense of romance to its name. "In 1876 I moved," says Edison, "to Menlo Park, New Jersey, on the Pennsylvania Railroad, several miles south of Elizabeth. I made the move because I had issues with rent. I had rented a small shop in Newark, on the top floor of a padlock factory, by the month. I gave notice that I would leave at the end of the month, paid the rent, moved out, and returned the keys. Shortly after that, I received a notice, probably a judgment, stating that I had to pay nine months' rent. There seems to have been a law that made a monthly renter liable for a year. This seemed so unfair that I decided to get out of a place that allowed such injustice." For several Sundays, he walked around different parts of New Jersey with two of his assistants before deciding on Menlo Park. The change proved to be fortunate, as the inventor had married Miss Mary E. Stillwell and was now able to settle down comfortably with his wife and family while enjoying immediate access to the new laboratory. Every moment saved was valuable.
To-day the place and region have gone back to the insignificance from which Edison's genius lifted them so startlingly. A glance from the car windows reveals only a gently rolling landscape dotted with modest residences and unpretentious barns; and there is nothing in sight by way of memorial to suggest that for nearly a decade this spot was the scene of the most concentrated and fruitful inventive activity the world has ever known. Close to the Menlo Park railway station is a group of gaunt and deserted buildings, shelter of the casual tramp, and slowly crumbling away when not destroyed by the carelessness of some ragged smoker. This silent group of buildings comprises the famous old laboratory and workshops of Mr. Edison, historic as being the birthplace of the carbon transmitter, the phonograph, the incandescent lamp, and the spot where Edison also worked out his systems of electrical distribution, his commercial dynamo, his electric railway, his megaphone, his tasimeter, and many other inventions of greater or lesser degree. Here he continued, moreover, his earlier work on the quadruplex, sextuplex, multiplex, and automatic telegraphs, and did his notable pioneer work in wireless telegraphy. As the reader knows, it had been a master passion with Edison from boyhood up to possess a laboratory, in which with free use of his own time and powers, and with command of abundant material resources, he could wrestle with Nature and probe her closest secrets. Thus, from the little cellar at Port Huron, from the scant shelves in a baggage car, from the nooks and corners of dingy telegraph offices, and the grimy little shops in New York and Newark, he had now come to the proud ownership of an establishment to which his favorite word "laboratory" might justly be applied. Here he could experiment to his heart's content and invent on a larger, bolder scale than ever—and he did!
Today, the place and region have returned to the insignificance from which Edison's genius elevated them so dramatically. A glance from the car windows reveals only a gently rolling landscape dotted with modest homes and simple barns; there’s nothing in sight to memorialize that for nearly a decade, this spot was the center of the most intense and productive inventive activity the world has ever known. Close to the Menlo Park train station is a group of rundown and deserted buildings, a shelter for the occasional drifter, slowly falling apart unless damaged by the carelessness of some scruffy smoker. This silent cluster of buildings includes the famous old laboratory and workshops of Mr. Edison, historic for being the birthplace of the carbon transmitter, the phonograph, the incandescent lamp, and the place where Edison also developed his systems of electrical distribution, commercial dynamo, electric railway, megaphone, tasimeter, and many other inventions of varying significance. Here he also continued his earlier work on the quadruplex, sextuplex, multiplex, and automatic telegraphs, and made significant strides in wireless telegraphy. As readers know, it had been a lifelong passion for Edison to have a laboratory where he could freely use his time and resources to grapple with nature and uncover her deepest secrets. From the small cellar in Port Huron, from the limited shelves in a baggage car, from the nooks and crannies of dingy telegraph offices, and the shabby little shops in New York and Newark, he had now arrived at the proud ownership of a facility that could genuinely be called a "laboratory." Here, he could experiment to his heart's content and invent on a larger, bolder scale than ever—and he did!
Menlo Park was the merest hamlet. Omitting the laboratory structures, it had only about seven houses, the best looking of which Edison lived in, a place that had a windmill pumping water into a reservoir. One of the stories of the day was that Edison had his front gate so connected with the pumping plant that every visitor as he opened or closed the gate added involuntarily to the supply in the reservoir. Two or three of the houses were occupied by the families of members of the staff; in the others boarders were taken, the laboratory, of course, furnishing all the patrons. Near the railway station was a small saloon kept by an old Scotchman named Davis, where billiards were played in idle moments, and where in the long winter evenings the hot stove was a centre of attraction to loungers and story-tellers. The truth is that there was very little social life of any kind possible under the strenuous conditions prevailing at the laboratory, where, if anywhere, relaxation was enjoyed at odd intervals of fatigue and waiting.
Menlo Park was just a tiny village. Aside from the laboratory buildings, there were only about seven houses, the nicest of which Edison lived in. It had a windmill that pumped water into a reservoir. One of the local stories was that Edison had his front gate connected to the pumping system so that every time someone opened or closed the gate, it automatically added to the water supply in the reservoir. Two or three of the houses were occupied by staff members' families, while the others took in boarders, with the laboratory providing all the patrons. Near the train station, there was a small bar run by an old Scottish man named Davis, where people played billiards during their free time, and in the long winter evenings, the warm stove was a gathering spot for loungers and storytellers. The reality was that there was very little social life possible under the demanding conditions at the lab, where any relaxation came in brief moments of fatigue and waiting.
The main laboratory was a spacious wooden building of two floors. The office was in this building at first, until removed to the brick library when that was finished. There S. L. Griffin, an old telegraph friend of Edison, acted as his secretary and had charge of a voluminous and amazing correspondence. The office employees were the Carman brothers and the late John F. Randolph, afterwards secretary. According to Mr. Francis Jehl, of Budapest, then one of the staff, to whom the writers are indebted for a great deal of valuable data on this period: "It was on the upper story of this laboratory that the most important experiments were executed, and where the incandescent lamp was born. This floor consisted of a large hall containing several long tables, upon which could be found all the various instruments, scientific and chemical apparatus that the arts at that time could produce. Books lay promiscuously about, while here and there long lines of bichromate-of-potash cells could be seen, together with experimental models of ideas that Edison or his assistants were engaged upon. The side walls of this hall were lined with shelves filled with bottles, phials, and other receptacles containing every imaginable chemical and other material that could be obtained, while at the end of this hall, and near the organ which stood in the rear, was a large glass case containing the world's most precious metals in sheet and wire form, together with very rare and costly chemicals. When evening came on, and the last rays of the setting sun penetrated through the side windows, this hall looked like a veritable Faust laboratory.
The main lab was a spacious two-story wooden building. The office was initially located there until it moved to the brick library after it was completed. S. L. Griffin, an old telegraph friend of Edison, served as his secretary and managed a huge and impressive correspondence. The office staff included the Carman brothers and the late John F. Randolph, who later became the secretary. According to Mr. Francis Jehl from Budapest, who was one of the staff members and provided the writers with valuable information from this period: "The most important experiments took place on the upper floor of this laboratory, where the incandescent lamp was created. This floor featured a large hall with several long tables equipped with all kinds of scientific and chemical instruments produced at the time. Books were scattered around, and there were long rows of bichromate-of-potash cells, along with experimental models of concepts that Edison or his team were working on. The side walls of the hall were lined with shelves filled with bottles, vials, and other containers holding every imaginable chemical and material available. At the end of the hall, near the organ located in the back, was a large glass case displaying the world's most precious metals in sheet and wire form, along with rare and expensive chemicals. When evening fell and the last rays of the setting sun streamed through the windows, this hall resembled a true Faust laboratory."
"On the ground floor we had our testing-table, which stood on two large pillars of brick built deep into the earth in order to get rid of all vibrations on account of the sensitive instruments that were upon it. There was the Thomson reflecting mirror galvanometer and electrometer, while nearby were the standard cells by which the galvanometers were adjusted and standardized. This testing-table was connected by means of wires with all parts of the laboratory and machine-shop, so that measurements could be conveniently made from a distance, as in those days we had no portable and direct-reading instruments, such as now exist. Opposite this table we installed, later on, our photometrical chamber, which was constructed on the Bunsen principle. A little way from this table, and separated by a partition, we had the chemical laboratory with its furnaces and stink-chambers. Later on another chemical laboratory was installed near the photometer-room, and this Dr. A. Haid had charge of."
"On the ground floor, we had our testing table, which was supported by two big brick pillars anchored deep into the ground to eliminate any vibrations from the sensitive instruments on it. There was the Thomson reflecting mirror galvanometer and electrometer, and nearby were the standard cells used to adjust and standardize the galvanometers. This testing table was connected by wires to all parts of the laboratory and machine shop, allowing us to take measurements conveniently from a distance, since back then we didn't have portable, direct-reading instruments like we do today. Later on, we set up our photometrical chamber across from this table, which was built on the Bunsen principle. Just a short distance from this table, separated by a partition, was the chemical lab with its furnaces and fume hoods. Eventually, we installed another chemical laboratory near the photometer room, which was overseen by Dr. A. Haid."
Next to the laboratory in importance was the machine-shop, a large and well-lighted building of brick, at one end of which there was the boiler and engine-room. This shop contained light and heavy lathes, boring and drilling machines, all kinds of planing machines; in fact, tools of all descriptions, so that any apparatus, however delicate or heavy, could be made and built as might be required by Edison in experimenting. Mr. John Kruesi had charge of this shop, and was assisted by a number of skilled mechanics, notably John Ott, whose deft fingers and quick intuitive grasp of the master's ideas are still in demand under the more recent conditions at the Llewellyn Park laboratory in Orange.
Next in importance to the laboratory was the machine shop, a large, well-lit brick building. At one end was the boiler and engine room. This shop had both light and heavy lathes, boring and drilling machines, and various planing machines; in short, tools of all kinds, so that any apparatus, no matter how delicate or heavy, could be created as needed for Edison's experiments. Mr. John Kruesi managed this shop and was helped by several skilled mechanics, including John Ott, whose skilled hands and quick understanding of the master's ideas are still sought after in the more recent operations at the Llewellyn Park laboratory in Orange.
Between the machine-shop and the laboratory was a small building of wood used as a carpenter-shop, where Tom Logan plied his art. Nearby was the gasoline plant. Before the incandescent lamp was perfected, the only illumination was from gasoline gas; and that was used later for incandescent-lamp glass-blowing, which was done in another small building on one side of the laboratory. Apparently little or no lighting service was obtained from the Wallace-Farmer arc lamps secured from Ansonia, Connecticut. The dynamo was probably needed for Edison's own experiments.
Between the machine shop and the lab was a small wooden building used as a carpenter shop, where Tom Logan practiced his craft. Close by was the gasoline plant. Before the incandescent bulb was perfected, the only lighting came from gasoline gas; this was later used for blowing glass for incandescent lamps, which took place in another small building next to the lab. It seemed that little to no lighting service came from the Wallace-Farmer arc lamps sourced from Ansonia, Connecticut. The dynamo was likely reserved for Edison's own experiments.
On the outskirts of the property was a small building in which lampblack was crudely but carefully manufactured and pressed into very small cakes, for use in the Edison carbon transmitters of that time. The night-watchman, Alfred Swanson, took care of this curious plant, which consisted of a battery of petroleum lamps that were forced to burn to the sooting point. During his rounds in the night Swanson would find time to collect from the chimneys the soot that the lamps gave. It was then weighed out into very small portions, which were pressed into cakes or buttons by means of a hand-press. These little cakes were delicately packed away between layers of cotton in small, light boxes and shipped to Bergmann in New York, by whom the telephone transmitters were being made. A little later the Edison electric railway was built on the confines of the property out through the woods, at first only a third of a mile in length, but reaching ultimately to Pumptown, almost three miles away.
On the edge of the property was a small building where lampblack was made, though not very well, and pressed into tiny cakes for use in the Edison carbon transmitters of the time. The night-watchman, Alfred Swanson, took care of this unusual facility, which had a set of petroleum lamps that were forced to burn until they produced soot. During his night rounds, Swanson would find time to collect the soot from the chimneys of the lamps. He then weighed it out into tiny portions, which were pressed into cakes or buttons using a hand press. These little cakes were carefully packed between layers of cotton in small, lightweight boxes and shipped to Bergmann in New York, where the telephone transmitters were being manufactured. Shortly after, the Edison electric railway was built on the edge of the property, going through the woods, initially just a third of a mile long but eventually extending to Pumptown, nearly three miles away.
Mr. Edison's own words may be quoted as to the men with whom he surrounded himself here and upon whose services he depended principally for help in the accomplishment of his aims. In an autobiographical article in the Electrical World of March 5, 1904, he says: "It is interesting to note that in addition to those mentioned above (Charles Batchelor and Frank Upton), I had around me other men who ever since have remained active in the field, such as Messrs. Francis Jehl, William J. Hammer, Martin Force, Ludwig K. Boehm, not forgetting that good friend and co-worker, the late John Kruesi. They found plenty to do in the various developments of the art, and as I now look back I sometimes wonder how we did so much in so short a time." Mr. Jehl in his reminiscences adds another name to the above—namely, that of John W. Lawson, and then goes on to say: "These are the names of the pioneers of incandescent lighting, who were continuously at the side of Edison day and night for some years, and who, under his guidance, worked upon the carbon-filament lamp from its birth to ripe maturity. These men all had complete faith in his ability and stood by him as on a rock, guarding their work with the secretiveness of a burglar-proof safe. Whenever it leaked out in the world that Edison was succeeding in his work on the electric light, spies and others came to the Park; so it was of the utmost importance that the experiments and their results should be kept a secret until Edison had secured the protection of the Patent Office." With this staff was associated from the first Mr. E. H. Johnson, whose work with Mr. Edison lay chiefly, however, outside the laboratory, taking him to all parts of the country and to Europe. There were also to be regarded as detached members of it the Bergmann brothers, manufacturing for Mr. Edison in New York, and incessantly experimenting for him. In addition there must be included Mr. Samuel Insull, whose activities for many years as private secretary and financial manager were devoted solely to Mr. Edison's interests, with Menlo Park as a centre and main source of anxiety as to pay-rolls and other constantly recurring obligations. The names of yet other associates occur from time to time in this narrative—"Edison men" who have been very proud of their close relationship to the inventor and his work at old Menlo. "There was also Mr. Charles L. Clarke, who devoted himself mainly to engineering matters, and later on acted as chief engineer of the Edison Electric Light Company for some years. Then there were William Holzer and James Hipple, both of whom took an active part in the practical development of the glass-blowing department of the laboratory, and, subsequently, at the first Edison lamp factory at Menlo Park. Later on Messrs. Jehl, Hipple, and Force assisted Mr. Batchelor to install the lamp-works of the French Edison Company at Ivry-sur-Seine. Then there were Messrs. Charles T. Hughes, Samuel D. Mott, and Charles T. Mott, who devoted their time chiefly to commercial affairs. Mr. Hughes conducted most of this work, and later on took a prominent part in Edison's electric-railway experiments. His business ability was on a high level, while his personal character endeared him to us all."
Mr. Edison's own words provide insight into the people he relied on for support in achieving his goals. In an autobiographical piece in the Electrical World from March 5, 1904, he states: "It's worth noting that besides those I mentioned earlier (Charles Batchelor and Frank Upton), I had other men around me who have remained active in the field ever since, like Francis Jehl, William J. Hammer, Martin Force, and Ludwig K. Boehm, not to mention my good friend and co-worker, the late John Kruesi. They found plenty to do with the various advancements in the field, and looking back, I sometimes wonder how we accomplished so much in such a short time." Mr. Jehl, in his memories, adds another name—John W. Lawson—and continues: "These are the names of the pioneers of incandescent lighting who were by Edison's side day and night for several years and who, under his direction, worked on the carbon-filament lamp from its inception to full development. These men had complete faith in his abilities and supported him wholeheartedly, guarding their work like it was a top-secret project. Whenever word got out that Edison was making progress with the electric light, spies and others would come to the Park; thus, it was crucial to keep the experiments and their results confidential until Edison secured protection from the Patent Office." From the start, Mr. E. H. Johnson was part of this team, although his work with Edison primarily took him across the country and to Europe. The Bergmann brothers, who manufactured for Edison in New York and constantly experimented on his behalf, were also considered part of the group. Additionally, Mr. Samuel Insull should be mentioned, as he dedicated many years as Edison's private secretary and financial manager, focused on Edison's interests with Menlo Park being a central concern for payrolls and recurring expenses. Other associates pop up throughout this story—“Edison men” who proudly maintained a close connection to the inventor and his work at Menlo. Mr. Charles L. Clarke also contributed mainly to engineering matters and later served as chief engineer for the Edison Electric Light Company for several years. William Holzer and James Hipple were actively involved in developing the glass-blowing section of the lab and later in the first Edison lamp factory at Menlo Park. Eventually, Messrs. Jehl, Hipple, and Force assisted Mr. Batchelor in setting up the lamp factory of the French Edison Company in Ivry-sur-Seine. Messrs. Charles T. Hughes, Samuel D. Mott, and Charles T. Mott mainly focused on commercial operations. Mr. Hughes oversaw much of this work and later played a significant role in Edison's electric railway projects. His business acumen was impressive, and his personal character won him the affection of all of us.
Among other now well-known men who came to us and assisted in various kinds of work were Messrs. Acheson, Worth, Crosby, Herrick, and Hill, while Doctor Haid was placed by Mr. Edison in charge of a special chemical laboratory. Dr. E. L. Nichols was also with us for a short time conducting a special series of experiments. There was also Mr. Isaacs, who did a great deal of photographic work, and to whom we must be thankful for the pictures of Menlo Park in connection with Edison's work.
Among other notable men who joined us and helped with different tasks were Messrs. Acheson, Worth, Crosby, Herrick, and Hill, while Mr. Edison appointed Doctor Haid to oversee a special chemical lab. Dr. E. L. Nichols was also with us for a brief period, conducting a unique series of experiments. Additionally, Mr. Isaacs contributed a significant amount of photography work, and we owe him gratitude for the images of Menlo Park related to Edison's projects.
"Among others who were added to Mr. Kruesi's staff in the machine-shop were Messrs. J. H. Vail and W. S. Andrews. Mr. Vail had charge of the dynamo-room. He had a good general knowledge of machinery, and very soon acquired such familiarity with the dynamos that he could skip about among them with astonishing agility to regulate their brushes or to throw rosin on the belts when they began to squeal. Later on he took an active part in the affairs and installations of the Edison Light Company. Mr. Andrews stayed on Mr. Kruesi's staff as long as the laboratory machine-shop was kept open, after which he went into the employ of the Edison Electric Light Company and became actively engaged in the commercial and technical exploitation of the system. Another man who was with us at Menlo Park was Mr. Herman Claudius, an Austrian, who at one time was employed in connection with the State Telegraphs of his country. To him Mr. Edison assigned the task of making a complete model of the network of conductors for the contemplated first station in New York."
Among the others who joined Mr. Kruesi's team in the machine shop were J. H. Vail and W. S. Andrews. Mr. Vail was in charge of the dynamo room. He had a solid general understanding of machinery and quickly became so familiar with the dynamos that he could move around them with impressive ease to adjust their brushes or apply rosin to the belts when they started to squeak. Later on, he played an active role in the operations and installations of the Edison Light Company. Mr. Andrews stayed on Mr. Kruesi's team as long as the laboratory machine shop was open, after which he worked for the Edison Electric Light Company and became actively involved in the commercial and technical development of the system. Another person who was with us at Menlo Park was Herman Claudius, an Austrian who had previously worked with his country’s State Telegraphs. Mr. Edison assigned him the task of creating a complete model of the network of conductors for the planned first station in New York.
Mr. Francis R. Upton, who was early employed by Mr. Edison as his mathematician, furnishes a pleasant, vivid picture of his chief associates engaged on the memorable work at Menlo Park. He says: "Mr. Charles Batchelor was Mr. Edison's principal assistant at that time. He was an Englishman, and came to this country to set up the thread-weaving machinery for the Clark thread-works. He was a most intelligent, patient, competent, and loyal assistant to Mr. Edison. I remember distinctly seeing him work many hours to mount a small filament; and his hand would be as steady and his patience as unyielding at the end of those many hours as it was at the beginning, in spite of repeated failures. He was a wonderful mechanic; the control that he had of his fingers was marvellous, and his eyesight was sharp. Mr. Batchelor's judgment and good sense were always in evidence.
Mr. Francis R. Upton, who was hired early on by Mr. Edison as his mathematician, paints a vivid picture of his key colleagues working on the groundbreaking projects at Menlo Park. He says: "Mr. Charles Batchelor was Mr. Edison's main assistant at that time. He was from England and came to this country to set up the thread-weaving machinery for the Clark thread factory. He was an incredibly intelligent, patient, skilled, and loyal assistant to Mr. Edison. I distinctly remember watching him spend hours mounting a small filament, and his hands were as steady and his patience as unwavering at the end of those long hours as they were at the start, despite numerous setbacks. He was an amazing mechanic; the control he had over his fingers was impressive, and his vision was sharp. Mr. Batchelor's judgment and good sense were always evident."
"Mr. Kruesi was the superintendent, a Swiss trained in the best Swiss ideas of accuracy. He was a splendid mechanic with a vigorous temper, and wonderful ability to work continuously and to get work out of men. It was an ideal combination, that of Edison, Batchelor, and Kruesi. Mr. Edison with his wonderful flow of ideas which were sharply defined in his mind, as can be seen by any of the sketches that he made, as he evidently always thinks in three dimensions; Mr. Kruesi, willing to take the ideas, and capable of comprehending them, would distribute the work so as to get it done with marvellous quickness and great accuracy. Mr. Batchelor was always ready for any special fine experimenting or observation, and could hold to whatever he was at as long as Mr. Edison wished; and always brought to bear on what he was at the greatest skill."
Mr. Kruesi was the superintendent, a Swiss guy trained in top-notch Swiss methods of precision. He was an excellent mechanic with a strong temper and an amazing ability to work non-stop and motivate others. It was an ideal mix, combining Edison, Batchelor, and Kruesi. Mr. Edison had an incredible flow of ideas that were clearly defined in his mind, as shown in any of his sketches; he always thought in three dimensions. Mr. Kruesi, who was eager to take the ideas and fully understood them, organized the work to ensure it got done quickly and accurately. Mr. Batchelor was always ready for any specific experiments or observations and could focus on whatever he was doing for as long as Mr. Edison needed; he consistently applied the highest level of skill to his work.
While Edison depended upon Upton for his mathematical work, he was wont to check it up in a very practical manner, as evidenced by the following incident described by Mr. Jehl: "I was once with Mr. Upton calculating some tables which he had put me on, when Mr. Edison appeared with a glass bulb having a pear-shaped appearance in his hand. It was the kind that we were going to use for our lamp experiments; and Mr. Edison asked Mr. Upton to please calculate for him its cubic contents in centimetres. Now Mr. Upton was a very able mathematician, who, after he finished his studies at Princeton, went to Germany and got his final gloss under that great master, Helmholtz. Whatever he did and worked on was executed in a pure mathematical manner, and any wrangler at Oxford would have been delighted to see him juggle with integral and differential equations, with a dexterity that was surprising. He drew the shape of the bulb exactly on paper, and got the equation of its lines with which he was going to calculate its contents, when Mr. Edison again appeared and asked him what it was. He showed Edison the work he had already done on the subject, and told him that he would very soon finish calculating it. 'Why,' said Edison, 'I would simply take that bulb and fill it with mercury and weigh it; and from the weight of the mercury and its specific gravity I'll get it in five minutes, and use less mental energy than is necessary in such a fatiguing operation.'"
While Edison relied on Upton for his math work, he liked to verify it in a very hands-on way, as shown by the following incident described by Mr. Jehl: "I was once with Mr. Upton calculating some tables he had assigned to me when Mr. Edison showed up with a glass bulb that had a pear shape. It was the kind we were going to use for our lamp experiments, and Mr. Edison asked Mr. Upton to calculate its volume in centimeters. Now, Mr. Upton was a highly skilled mathematician who, after finishing his studies at Princeton, went to Germany to refine his skills under the great master Helmholtz. Everything he did was purely mathematical, and any scholar at Oxford would have been impressed to see him handling integral and differential equations with surprising ease. He sketched the shape of the bulb on paper and derived the equations for its sides to calculate its volume when Mr. Edison appeared again and asked him what he was doing. He showed Edison the work he had done and told him he would finish the calculation very soon. 'Why,' said Edison, 'I would just take that bulb, fill it with mercury, and weigh it; from the weight of the mercury and its specific gravity, I can get the volume in five minutes and use less brainpower than is needed for such a tedious task.'"
Menlo Park became ultimately the centre of Edison's business life as it was of his inventing. After the short distasteful period during the introduction of his lighting system, when he spent a large part of his time at the offices at 65 Fifth Avenue, New York, or on the actual work connected with the New York Edison installation, he settled back again in Menlo Park altogether. Mr. Samuel Insull describes the business methods which prevailed throughout the earlier Menlo Park days of "storm and stress," and the curious conditions with which he had to deal as private secretary: "I never attempted to systematize Edison's business life. Edison's whole method of work would upset the system of any office. He was just as likely to be at work in his laboratory at midnight as midday. He cared not for the hours of the day or the days of the week. If he was exhausted he might more likely be asleep in the middle of the day than in the middle of the night, as most of his work in the way of inventions was done at night. I used to run his office on as close business methods as my experience admitted; and I would get at him whenever it suited his convenience. Sometimes he would not go over his mail for days at a time; but other times he would go regularly to his office in the morning. At other times my engagements used to be with him to go over his business affairs at Menlo Park at night, if I was occupied in New York during the day. In fact, as a matter of convenience I used more often to get at him at night, as it left my days free to transact his affairs, and enabled me, probably at a midnight luncheon, to get a few minutes of his time to look over his correspondence and get his directions as to what I should do in some particular negotiation or matter of finance. While it was a matter of suiting Edison's convenience as to when I should transact business with him, it also suited my own ideas, as it enabled me after getting through my business with him to enjoy the privilege of watching him at his work, and to learn something about the technical side of matters. Whatever knowledge I may have of the electric light and power industry I feel I owe it to the tuition of Edison. He was about the most willing tutor, and I must confess that he had to be a patient one."
Menlo Park ultimately became the center of Edison's business life as it was of his inventing. After a brief and unpleasant period during the introduction of his lighting system, when he spent a large part of his time at the offices at 65 Fifth Avenue, New York, or on the actual work connected with the New York Edison installation, he returned to Menlo Park entirely. Mr. Samuel Insull describes the business methods that were common during the earlier Menlo Park days of "storm and stress," and the strange conditions he faced as Edison's private secretary: "I never tried to organize Edison's business life. His whole approach to work would disrupt the systems of any office. He was just as likely to be working in his laboratory at midnight as at noon. He didn't care about the hours of the day or the days of the week. If he was tired, he might be more likely to be sleeping in the middle of the day than at night, as most of his invention work was done at night. I would run his office using the best business methods my experience allowed; and I would reach him whenever it was convenient for him. Sometimes he wouldn’t go through his mail for days, but other times he would go to his office regularly in the morning. Other times, we would plan to go over his business affairs in Menlo Park at night if I was busy in New York during the day. In fact, for convenience, I often met with him at night, which left my days free to handle his affairs, and allowed me, often during a midnight lunch, to get a few minutes of his time to review his correspondence and get his directions on specific negotiations or financial matters. While it was a matter of fitting Edison's schedule for when I could do business with him, it also suited my own plans, as it allowed me, after working with him, to enjoy the privilege of watching him at work and learning something about the technical side of things. Whatever knowledge I have about the electric light and power industry, I believe I owe it to Edison's teaching. He was one of the most willing tutors, and I must admit that he had to be a patient one."
Here again occurs the reference to the incessant night-work at Menlo Park, a note that is struck in every reminiscence and in every record of the time. But it is not to be inferred that the atmosphere of grim determination and persistent pursuit of the new invention characteristic of this period made life a burden to the small family of laborers associated with Edison. Many a time during the long, weary nights of experimenting Edison would call a halt for refreshments, which he had ordered always to be sent in when night-work was in progress. Everything would be dropped, all present would join in the meal, and the last good story or joke would pass around. In his notes Mr. Jehl says: "Our lunch always ended with a cigar, and I may mention here that although Edison was never fastidious in eating, he always relished a good cigar, and seemed to find in it consolation and solace.... It often happened that while we were enjoying the cigars after our midnight repast, one of the boys would start up a tune on the organ and we would all sing together, or one of the others would give a solo. Another of the boys had a voice that sounded like something between the ring of an old tomato can and a pewter jug. He had one song that he would sing while we roared with laughter. He was also great in imitating the tin-foil phonograph.... When Boehm was in good-humor he would play his zither now and then, and amuse us by singing pretty German songs. On many of these occasions the laboratory was the rendezvous of jolly and convivial visitors, mostly old friends and acquaintances of Mr. Edison. Some of the office employees would also drop in once in a while, and as everybody present was always welcome to partake of the midnight meal, we all enjoyed these gatherings. After a while, when we were ready to resume work, our visitors would intimate that they were going home to bed, but we fellows could stay up and work, and they would depart, generally singing some song like Good-night, ladies! . . . It often happened that when Edison had been working up to three or four o'clock in the morning, he would lie down on one of the laboratory tables, and with nothing but a couple of books for a pillow, would fall into a sound sleep. He said it did him more good than being in a soft bed, which spoils a man. Some of the laboratory assistants could be seen now and then sleeping on a table in the early morning hours. If their snoring became objectionable to those still at work, the 'calmer' was applied. This machine consisted of a Babbitt's soap box without a cover. Upon it was mounted a broad ratchet-wheel with a crank, while into the teeth of the wheel there played a stout, elastic slab of wood. The box would be placed on the table where the snorer was sleeping and the crank turned rapidly. The racket thus produced was something terrible, and the sleeper would jump up as though a typhoon had struck the laboratory. The irrepressible spirit of humor in the old days, although somewhat strenuous at times, caused many a moment of hilarity which seemed to refresh the boys, and enabled them to work with renewed vigor after its manifestation." Mr. Upton remarks that often during the period of the invention of the incandescent lamp, when under great strain and fatigue, Edison would go to the organ and play tunes in a primitive way, and come back to crack jokes with the staff. "But I have often felt that Mr. Edison never could comprehend the limitations of the strength of other men, as his own physical and mental strength have always seemed to be without limit. He could work continuously as long as he wished, and had sleep at his command. His sleep was always instant, profound, and restful. He has told me that he never dreamed. I have known Mr. Edison now for thirty-one years, and feel that he has always kept his mind direct and simple, going straight to the root of troubles. One of the peculiarities I have noticed is that I have never known him to break into a conversation going on around him, and ask what people were talking about. The nearest he would ever come to it was when there had evidently been some story told, and his face would express a desire to join in the laugh, which would immediately invite telling the story to him."
Here we see the reference to the endless night shifts at Menlo Park, a theme that appears in every recollection and record from that time. However, it's important to note that the atmosphere of intense determination and relentless pursuit of new inventions during this period didn't make life miserable for the small group of workers associated with Edison. Often, during the long, exhausting nights of experiments, Edison would call a break for refreshments, which he always had arranged to be delivered when they were working late. Everything would stop, and everyone present would share a meal together, swapping the latest good story or joke. In his notes, Mr. Jehl writes: "Our lunch always ended with a cigar, and I should mention that even though Edison wasn't picky about food, he truly enjoyed a good cigar and seemed to find comfort in it.... Often, while we were enjoying our cigars after our late-night meal, one of the guys would start playing a tune on the organ, and we would all sing along, or someone would perform a solo. One guy had a voice that sounded like a mix between an old tomato can and a tin jug. He had one song he would sing while we all laughed uproariously. He was also great at mimicking the tin-foil phonograph.... When Boehm was in a good mood, he would occasionally play his zither and entertain us with pretty German songs. Many times, the laboratory became a gathering place for cheerful and friendly visitors, mostly old friends and acquaintances of Mr. Edison. Some office employees would also stop by now and then, and since everyone was always welcome to join the midnight meal, we all enjoyed these get-togethers. After a while, when we were ready to get back to work, our visitors would hint that they needed to go home to sleep, but we would stay up and keep working, and they would leave, usually humming some song like "Good-night, ladies!" It was common for Edison, after working until three or four in the morning, to lie down on one of the lab tables, using just a couple of books for a pillow, and fall into a deep sleep. He claimed it was more refreshing than a soft bed, which he thought was counterproductive. Sometimes, you could spot lab assistants sleeping on a table in the early morning hours. If their snoring became too distracting for those still working, they would use the 'calmer.' This contraption consisted of a soap box without a lid. On it was a large ratchet wheel with a crank, and a sturdy, flexible piece of wood would strike the teeth of the wheel. They would place the box on the table where the snorer was resting and crank it rapidly. The noise it created was outrageous, and the sleeper would jump up as though a storm had hit the lab. The lively spirit of humor during those days, while occasionally intense, often created moments of laughter that seemed to energize everyone and helped them work with renewed enthusiasm afterward." Mr. Upton notes that often during the time Edison was inventing the incandescent lamp, when he was under a lot of stress and fatigue, he would go to the organ and play tunes in a very basic way, then come back to joke around with the team. "But I've often felt that Mr. Edison couldn't fully understand the limits of other people's strength, as his own physical and mental stamina always seemed boundless. He could work nonstop for as long as he wanted and could sleep whenever he desired. His sleep was always immediate, deep, and restful. He once mentioned to me that he never dreamed. I've known Mr. Edison for thirty-one years, and I think he has always kept his thinking straightforward and simple, getting right to the heart of issues. One odd thing I've noticed is that I have never seen him interrupt a conversation happening around him to ask what people were discussing. The closest he would come was when it was obvious that a story had been shared, and his face would show a desire to join in the laughter, which would then prompt someone to tell the story to him."
Next to those who worked with Edison at the laboratory and were with him constantly at Menlo Park were the visitors, some of whom were his business associates, some of them scientific men, and some of them hero-worshippers and curiosity-hunters. Foremost in the first category was Mr. E. H. Johnson, who was in reality Edison's most intimate friend, and was required for constant consultation; but whose intense activity, remarkable grasp of electrical principles, and unusual powers of exposition, led to his frequent detachment for long trips, including those which resulted in the introduction of the telephone, phonograph, and electric light in England and on the Continent. A less frequent visitor was Mr. S. Bergmann, who had all he needed to occupy his time in experimenting and manufacturing, and whose contemporaneous Wooster Street letter-heads advertised Edison's inventions as being made there, Among the scientists were Prof. George F. Barker, of Philadelphia, a big, good-natured philosopher, whose valuable advice Edison esteemed highly. In sharp contrast to him was the earnest, serious Rowland, of Johns Hopkins University, afterward the leading American physicist of his day. Profs. C. F. Brackett and C. F. Young, of Princeton University, were often received, always interested in what Edison was doing, and proud that one of their own students, Mr. Upton, was taking such a prominent part in the development of the work.
Next to those who worked with Edison at the lab and were with him constantly at Menlo Park were the visitors, some of whom were his business partners, some were scientists, and some were admirers and curious onlookers. Leading the first group was Mr. E. H. Johnson, who was actually Edison's closest friend and was needed for ongoing consultations; however, his intense activity, impressive understanding of electrical principles, and exceptional communication skills often pulled him away for extended trips, including those that led to the introduction of the telephone, phonograph, and electric light in England and across Europe. A less frequent visitor was Mr. S. Bergmann, who had plenty to keep him busy with experimenting and manufacturing, and whose contemporary Wooster Street letterheads promoted Edison's inventions as being produced there. Among the scientists were Prof. George F. Barker from Philadelphia, a big-hearted philosopher whose valuable advice Edison greatly valued. In stark contrast was the earnest and serious Rowland from Johns Hopkins University, who later became the leading American physicist of his time. Profs. C. F. Brackett and C. F. Young from Princeton University were often welcomed, always interested in what Edison was working on, and proud that one of their students, Mr. Upton, was playing such a key role in the development of the projects.
Soon after the success of the lighting experiments and the installation at Menlo Park became known, Edison was besieged by persons from all parts of the world anxious to secure rights and concessions for their respective countries. Among these was Mr. Louis Rau, of Paris, who organized the French Edison Company, the pioneer Edison lighting corporation in Europe, and who, with the aid of Mr. Batchelor, established lamp-works and a machine-shop at Ivry sur-Seine, near Paris, in 1882. It was there that Mr. Nikola Tesla made his entree into the field of light and power, and began his own career as an inventor; and there also Mr. Etienne Fodor, general manager of the Hungarian General Electric Company at Budapest, received his early training. It was he who erected at Athens the first European Edison station on the now universal three-wire system. Another visitor from Europe, a little later, was Mr. Emil Rathenau, the present director of the great Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft of Germany. He secured the rights for the empire, and organized the Berlin Edison system, now one of the largest in the world. Through his extraordinary energy and enterprise the business made enormous strides, and Mr. Rathenau has become one of the most conspicuous industrial figures in his native country. From Italy came Professor Colombo, later a cabinet minister, with his friend Signor Buzzi, of Milan. The rights were secured for the peninsula; Colombo and his friends organized the Italian Edison Company, and erected at Milan the first central station in that country. Mr. John W. Lieb, Jr., now a vice-president of the New York Edison Company, was sent over by Mr. Edison to steer the enterprise technically, and spent ten years in building it up, with such brilliant success that he was later decorated as Commander of the Order of the Crown of Italy by King Victor. Another young American enlisted into European service was Mr. E. G. Acheson, the inventor of carborundum, who built a number of plants in Italy and France before he returned home. Mr. Lieb has since become President of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers and the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, while Doctor Acheson has been President of the American Electrochemical Society.
Soon after the success of the lighting experiments and the installation at Menlo Park became known, Edison was overwhelmed by people from all over the world eager to secure rights and concessions for their countries. Among them was Mr. Louis Rau from Paris, who organized the French Edison Company, the first Edison lighting corporation in Europe, and, with Mr. Batchelor’s help, set up lamp works and a machine shop in Ivry sur-Seine, near Paris, in 1882. It was there that Mr. Nikola Tesla entered the field of light and power, starting his career as an inventor; and it was also here that Mr. Etienne Fodor, general manager of the Hungarian General Electric Company in Budapest, received his early training. He built the first European Edison station in Athens, using the now standard three-wire system. A little later, another visitor from Europe was Mr. Emil Rathenau, now the director of the major Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft in Germany. He secured the rights for the empire and organized the Berlin Edison system, which is now one of the largest in the world. Thanks to his remarkable energy and enterprise, the business made tremendous progress, and Mr. Rathenau became one of the most prominent industrial figures in his home country. From Italy came Professor Colombo, who later became a cabinet minister, along with his friend Signor Buzzi from Milan. They secured the rights for the peninsula; Colombo and his associates formed the Italian Edison Company and built the first central station in Milan. Mr. John W. Lieb, Jr., now a vice-president of the New York Edison Company, was sent by Mr. Edison to lead the technical side of the project and spent ten years developing it so successfully that he was later honored as Commander of the Order of the Crown of Italy by King Victor. Another young American who joined the European effort was Mr. E. G. Acheson, the inventor of carborundum, who built several plants in Italy and France before returning home. Mr. Lieb has since become President of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers and the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, while Dr. Acheson has served as President of the American Electrochemical Society.
Switzerland sent Messrs. Turrettini, Biedermann, and Thury, all distinguished engineers, to negotiate for rights in the republic; and so it went with regard to all the other countries of Europe, as well as those of South America. It was a question of keeping such visitors away rather than of inviting them to take up the exploitation of the Edison system; for what time was not spent in personal interviews was required for the masses of letters from every country under the sun, all making inquiries, offering suggestions, proposing terms. Nor were the visitors merely those on business bent. There were the lion-hunters and celebrities, of whom Sarah Bernhardt may serve as a type. One visit of note was that paid by Lieut. G. W. De Long, who had an earnest and protracted conversation with Edison over the Arctic expedition he was undertaking with the aid of Mr. James Gordon Bennett, of the New York Herald. The Jeannette was being fitted out, and Edison told De Long that he would make and present him with a small dynamo machine, some incandescent lamps, and an arc lamp. While the little dynamo was being built all the men in the laboratory wrote their names on the paper insulation that was wound upon the iron core of the armature. As the Jeannette had no steam-engine on board that could be used for the purpose, Edison designed the dynamo so that it could be worked by man power and told Lieutenant De Long "it would keep the boys warm up in the Arctic," when they generated current with it. The ill-fated ship never returned from her voyage, but went down in the icy waters of the North, there to remain until some future cataclysm of nature, ten thousand years hence, shall reveal the ship and the first marine dynamo as curious relics of a remote civilization.
Switzerland sent engineers Turrettini, Biedermann, and Thury to negotiate for rights in the republic, and this was the case with all the other European countries, as well as those in South America. It was more about keeping visitors away than inviting them to exploit the Edison system; the time not spent in personal meetings was consumed by countless letters from all over the world, making inquiries, suggesting ideas, and proposing terms. The visitors weren't just those on business. There were also adventurers and celebrities, like Sarah Bernhardt. One notable visit was from Lieutenant G. W. De Long, who had a serious and lengthy conversation with Edison about the Arctic expedition he was planning with Mr. James Gordon Bennett of the New York Herald. The Jeannette was being prepared, and Edison promised De Long that he would create and give him a small dynamo machine, some incandescent lamps, and an arc lamp. While the dynamo was being built, everyone in the lab signed their names on the paper insulation wrapped around the iron core of the armature. Since the Jeannette had no steam engine onboard to use for that purpose, Edison designed the dynamo to be powered by hand, telling Lieutenant De Long that "it would keep the boys warm up in the Arctic" when they generated electricity with it. The ill-fated ship never returned from its journey and sank in the icy northern waters, where it will remain until some future natural catastrophe, ten thousand years later, reveals the ship and the first marine dynamo as intriguing relics of a distant civilization.
Edison also furnished De Long with a set of telephones provided with extensible circuits, so that parties on the ice-floes could go long distances from the ship and still keep in communication with her. So far as the writers can ascertain this is the first example of "field telephony." Another nautical experiment that he made at this time, suggested probably by the requirements of the Arctic expedition, was a buoy that was floated in New York harbor, and which contained a small Edison dynamo and two or three incandescent lamps. The dynamo was driven by the wave or tide motion through intermediate mechanism, and thus the lamps were lit up from time to time, serving as signals. These were the prototypes of the lighted buoys which have since become familiar, as in the channel off Sandy Hook.
Edison also provided De Long with a set of telephones equipped with extendable circuits, allowing people on the ice floes to communicate with the ship even when they were far away. As far as the authors can tell, this is the first instance of "field telephony." Another maritime experiment he conducted around this time, likely inspired by the needs of the Arctic expedition, was a buoy set adrift in New York harbor. This buoy contained a small Edison dynamo and two or three incandescent lamps. The dynamo was powered by wave or tide motion through a mechanism, which periodically lit the lamps as signals. These were the predecessors of the lighted buoys that have since become common, like those in the channel off Sandy Hook.
One notable afternoon was that on which the New York board of aldermen took a special train out to Menlo Park to see the lighting system with its conductors underground in operation. The Edison Electric Illuminating Company was applying for a franchise, and the aldermen, for lack of scientific training and specific practical information, were very sceptical on the subject—as indeed they might well be. "Mr. Edison demonstrated personally the details and merits of the system to them. The voltage was increased to a higher pressure than usual, and all the incandescent lamps at Menlo Park did their best to win the approbation of the New York City fathers. After Edison had finished exhibiting all the good points of his system, he conducted his guests upstairs in the laboratory, where a long table was spread with the best things that one of the most prominent New York caterers could furnish. The laboratory witnessed high times that night, for all were in the best of humor, and many a bottle was drained in toasting the health of Edison and the aldermen." This was one of the extremely rare occasions on which Edison has addressed an audience; but the stake was worth the effort. The representatives of New York could with justice drink the health of the young inventor, whose system is one of the greatest boons the city has ever had conferred upon it.
One memorable afternoon was when the New York board of aldermen took a special train to Menlo Park to see the underground lighting system in action. The Edison Electric Illuminating Company was applying for a franchise, and the aldermen, lacking scientific knowledge and specific practical information, were understandably skeptical. "Mr. Edison personally demonstrated the details and advantages of the system to them. The voltage was raised to a higher level than usual, and all the incandescent lamps at Menlo Park did their best to impress the New York City officials. After Edison finished showcasing all the benefits of his system, he took his guests upstairs to the laboratory, where a long table was set with the finest offerings from one of New York’s top caterers. The laboratory was lively that night, as everyone was in great spirits, and many bottles were opened in toasting the health of Edison and the aldermen." This was one of the very few times Edison spoke to an audience, but the stakes made it worthwhile. The representatives of New York could rightly toast the young inventor, whose system is one of the greatest gifts the city has ever received.
Among other frequent visitors was Mr, Edison's father, "one of those amiable, patriarchal characters with a Horace Greeley beard, typical Americans of the old school," who would sometimes come into the laboratory with his two grandchildren, a little boy and girl called "Dash" and "Dot." He preferred to sit and watch his brilliant son at work "with an expression of satisfaction on his face that indicated a sense of happiness and content that his boy, born in that distant, humble home in Ohio, had risen to fame and brought such honor upon the name. It was, indeed, a pathetic sight to see a father venerate his son as the elder Edison did." Not less at home was Mr. Mackenzie, the Mt. Clemens station agent, the life of whose child Edison had saved when a train newsboy. The old Scotchman was one of the innocent, chartered libertines of the place, with an unlimited stock of good jokes and stories, but seldom of any practical use. On one occasion, however, when everything possible and impossible under the sun was being carbonized for lamp filaments, he allowed a handful of his bushy red beard to be taken for the purpose; and his laugh was the loudest when the Edison-Mackenzie hair lamps were brought up to incandescence—their richness in red rays being slyly attributed to the nature of the filamentary material! Oddly enough, a few years later, some inventor actually took out a patent for making incandescent lamps with carbonized hair for filaments!
Among the regular visitors was Mr. Edison's father, "one of those friendly, fatherly figures with a Horace Greeley-style beard, typical old-school Americans," who would sometimes come into the lab with his two grandkids, a little boy and girl named "Dash" and "Dot." He liked to sit and watch his talented son at work "with a look of satisfaction on his face that showed his happiness and pride that his boy, born in that distant, modest home in Ohio, had achieved fame and brought such honor to the family name. It was truly touching to see a father admire his son as the elder Edison did." Equally at home was Mr. Mackenzie, the Mt. Clemens station agent, whose child's life Edison had saved when he was a train newsboy. The old Scotsman was one of the local characters, full of good jokes and stories, though rarely of any practical use. One time, when they were carbonizing everything possible under the sun for lamp filaments, he allowed a handful of his bushy red beard to be used for the project; and his laugh was the loudest when the Edison-Mackenzie hair lamps were lit up—their rich red glow being humorously attributed to the type of material used for the filaments! Strangely enough, a few years later, some inventor actually patented the idea of making incandescent lamps with carbonized hair for filaments!
Yet other visitors again haunted the place, and with the following reminiscence of one of them, from Mr. Edison himself, this part of the chapter must close: "At Menlo Park one cold winter night there came into the laboratory a strange man in a most pitiful condition. He was nearly frozen, and he asked if he might sit by the stove. In a few moments he asked for the head man, and I was brought forward. He had a head of abnormal size, with highly intellectual features and a very small and emaciated body. He said he was suffering very much, and asked if I had any morphine. As I had about everything in chemistry that could be bought, I told him I had. He requested that I give him some, so I got the morphine sulphate. He poured out enough to kill two men, when I told him that we didn't keep a hotel for suicides, and he had better cut the quantity down. He then bared his legs and arms, and they were literally pitted with scars, due to the use of hypodermic syringes. He said he had taken it for years, and it required a big dose to have any effect. I let him go ahead. In a short while he seemed like another man and began to tell stories, and there were about fifty of us who sat around listening until morning. He was a man of great intelligence and education. He said he was a Jew, but there was no distinctive feature to verify this assertion. He continued to stay around until he finished every combination of morphine with an acid that I had, probably ten ounces all told. Then he asked if he could have strychnine. I had an ounce of the sulphate. He took enough to kill a horse, and asserted it had as good an effect as morphine. When this was gone, the only thing I had left was a chunk of crude opium, perhaps two or three pounds. He chewed this up and disappeared. I was greatly disappointed, because I would have laid in another stock of morphine to keep him at the laboratory. About a week afterward he was found dead in a barn at Perth Amboy."
Yet other visitors continued to frequent the place, and with the following memory from one of them, Mr. Edison himself, this part of the chapter must end: "One cold winter night at Menlo Park, a strange man walked into the lab in a terrible state. He was nearly frozen and asked if he could sit by the stove. After a few moments, he asked for the head man, and I was brought over. He had an unusually large head, intellectual features, and a very small, frail body. He said he was in a lot of pain and asked if I had any morphine. Since I had almost everything in chemistry that could be bought, I told him I did. He asked for some, so I got the morphine sulfate. He poured out enough to kill two men, and I told him we didn’t run a hotel for suicides, so he should lower the amount. He then rolled up his sleeves and pant legs, and they were covered in scars from using hypodermic syringes. He said he had been using it for years, and it took a huge dose for him to feel anything. I let him go ahead. Shortly after, he seemed like a different person and started telling stories, and about fifty of us sat around listening until morning. He was very intelligent and well-educated. He said he was Jewish, but there was nothing about him that confirmed this claim. He kept hanging around until he used up every combination of morphine with an acid that I had, probably about ten ounces in total. Then he asked if he could have strychnine. I had an ounce of the sulfate. He took enough to kill a horse and claimed it worked just as well as morphine. When that was gone, the only thing I had left was a chunk of crude opium, maybe two or three pounds. He chewed this up and vanished. I was really disappointed because I would have restocked on morphine to keep him at the lab. About a week later, he was found dead in a barn in Perth Amboy."
Returning to the work itself, note of which has already been made in this and preceding chapters, we find an interesting and unique reminiscence in Mr. Jehl's notes of the reversion to carbon as a filament in the lamps, following an exhibition of metallic-filament lamps given in the spring of 1879 to the men in the syndicate advancing the funds for these experiments: "They came to Menlo Park on a late afternoon train from New York. It was already dark when they were conducted into the machine-shop, where we had several platinum lamps installed in series. When Edison had finished explaining the principles and details of the lamp, he asked Kruesi to let the dynamo machine run. It was of the Gramme type, as our first dynamo of the Edison design was not yet finished. Edison then ordered the 'juice' to be turned on slowly. To-day I can see those lamps rising to a cherry red, like glowbugs, and hear Mr. Edison saying 'a little more juice,' and the lamps began to glow. 'A little more' is the command again, and then one of the lamps emits for an instant a light like a star in the distance, after which there is an eruption and a puff; and the machine-shop is in total darkness. We knew instantly which lamp had failed, and Batchelor replaced that by a good one, having a few in reserve near by. The operation was repeated two or three times with about the same results, after which the party went into the library until it was time to catch the train for New York."
Returning to the work itself, which has already been referenced in this and previous chapters, we find an interesting and unique memory in Mr. Jehl's notes about the switch back to carbon as a filament in the lamps, following a demonstration of metal-filament lamps held in the spring of 1879 for the men in the syndicate funding these experiments: "They arrived at Menlo Park on a late afternoon train from New York. It was already dark when they were taken into the machine shop, where we had several platinum lamps set up in a series. When Edison finished explaining the principles and details of the lamp, he asked Kruesi to turn on the dynamo machine. It was of the Gramme type, as our first dynamo of Edison's design wasn’t ready yet. Edison then instructed to slowly increase the 'juice.' Today, I can still see those lamps glowing a cherry red, like fireflies, and hear Mr. Edison saying 'a little more juice,' and the lamps started to glow. 'A little more' was the command again, and then one of the lamps emitted a light like a distant star for a brief moment, after which there was a burst and a puff; the machine shop was plunged into total darkness. We instantly knew which lamp had failed, and Batchelor replaced it with a good one, as he had a few in reserve nearby. This process was repeated two or three times with similar results, after which the group went into the library until it was time to catch the train back to New York."
Such an exhibition was decidedly discouraging, and it was not a jubilant party that returned to New York, but: "That night Edison remained in the laboratory meditating upon the results that the platinum lamp had given so far. I was engaged reading a book near a table in the front, while Edison was seated in a chair by a table near the organ. With his head turned downward, and that conspicuous lock of hair hanging loosely on one side, he looked like Napoleon in the celebrated picture, On the Eve of a Great Battle. Those days were heroic ones, for he then battled against mighty odds, and the prospects were dim and not very encouraging. In cases of emergency Edison always possessed a keen faculty of deciding immediately and correctly what to do; and the decision he then arrived at was predestined to be the turning-point that led him on to ultimate success.... After that exhibition we had a house-cleaning at the laboratory, and the metallic-filament lamps were stored away, while preparations were made for our experiments on carbon lamps."
That exhibition was really discouraging, and it wasn’t a joyful group that headed back to New York. That night, Edison stayed in the lab, thinking about the results of the platinum lamp so far. I was reading a book at a table in the front while Edison sat in a chair at a table near the organ. With his head down and that distinctive lock of hair hanging loosely to one side, he resembled Napoleon in the famous painting, On the Eve of a Great Battle. Those days were heroic; he was fighting against huge challenges, and the outlook was bleak and unpromising. In emergencies, Edison always had a sharp ability to quickly and accurately decide what to do, and the choice he made then was destined to be the pivotal moment that led him to eventual success. After that exhibition, we did a deep clean in the lab, putting away the metallic-filament lamps while getting ready for our experiments with carbon lamps.
Thus the work went on. Menlo Park has hitherto been associated in the public thought with the telephone, phonograph, and incandescent lamp; but it was there, equally, that the Edison dynamo and system of distribution were created and applied to their specific purposes. While all this study of a possible lamp was going on, Mr. Upton was busy calculating the economy of the "multiple arc" system, and making a great many tables to determine what resistance a lamp should have for the best results, and at what point the proposed general system would fall off in economy when the lamps were of the lower resistance that was then generally assumed to be necessary. The world at that time had not the shadow of an idea as to what the principles of a multiple arc system should be, enabling millions of lamps to be lighted off distributing circuits, each lamp independent of every other; but at Menlo Park at that remote period in the seventies Mr. Edison's mathematician was formulating the inventor's conception in clear, instructive figures; "and the work then executed has held its own ever since." From the beginning of his experiments on electric light, Mr. Edison had a well-defined idea of producing not only a practicable lamp, but also a SYSTEM of commercial electric lighting. Such a scheme involved the creation of an entirely new art, for there was nothing on the face of the earth from which to draw assistance or precedent, unless we except the elementary forms of dynamos then in existence. It is true, there were several types of machines in use for the then very limited field of arc lighting, but they were regarded as valueless as a part of a great comprehensive scheme which could supply everybody with light. Such machines were confessedly inefficient, although representing the farthest reach of a young art. A commission appointed at that time by the Franklin Institute, and including Prof. Elihu Thomson, investigated the merits of existing dynamos and reported as to the best of them: "The Gramme machine is the most economical as a means of converting motive force into electricity; it utilizes in the arc from 38 to 41 per cent. of the motive work produced, after deduction is made for friction and the resistance of the air." They reported also that the Brush arc lighting machine "produces in the luminous arc useful work equivalent to 31 per cent. of the motive power employed, or to 38 1/2 per cent. after the friction has been deducted." Commercial possibilities could not exist in the face of such low economy as this, and Mr. Edison realized that he would have to improve the dynamo himself if he wanted a better machine. The scientific world at that time was engaged in a controversy regarding the external and internal resistance of a circuit in which a generator was situated. Discussing the subject Mr. Jehl, in his biographical notes, says: "While this controversy raged in the scientific papers, and criticism and confusion seemed at its height, Edison and Upton discussed this question very thoroughly, and Edison declared he did not intend to build up a system of distribution in which the external resistance would be equal to the internal resistance. He said he was just about going to do the opposite; he wanted a large external resistance and a low internal one. He said he wanted to sell the energy outside of the station and not waste it in the dynamo and conductors, where it brought no profits.... In these later days, when these ideas of Edison are used as common property, and are applied in every modern system of distribution, it is astonishing to remember that when they were propounded they met with most vehement antagonism from the world at large." Edison, familiar with batteries in telegraphy, could not bring himself to believe that any substitute generator of electrical energy could be efficient that used up half its own possible output before doing an equal amount of outside work.
So the work continued. Menlo Park has always been linked in public minds with the telephone, phonograph, and incandescent light bulb; but it was also the place where the Edison dynamo and distribution system were created and put to specific use. While all this research on a potential light bulb was taking place, Mr. Upton was focused on calculating the efficiency of the "multiple arc" system and creating extensive tables to determine the ideal resistance a lamp should have for optimal performance, and at what point the proposed system would start to lose efficiency when using lamps with lower resistance, which was then generally assumed to be necessary. At that time, the world had no idea about the principles of a multiple arc system that could light up millions of lamps off distributing circuits, each lamp independent of the others; but at Menlo Park during that distant time in the 1870s, Mr. Edison's mathematician was clearly formulating the inventor's ideas in precise, educational figures; "and the work then done has remained relevant ever since." From the start of his experiments with electric light, Mr. Edison had a clear vision of not just creating a workable lamp, but also a complete SYSTEM for commercial electric lighting. This project required the development of an entirely new art, as there was nothing on Earth to draw from or serve as a model, except for the basic forms of dynamos that existed at the time. It's true that there were several types of machines being used for the limited field of arc lighting, but they were seen as lacking value in a broader plan to provide light for everyone. These machines were admittedly inefficient, even though they represented the forefront of a young technology. A commission set up by the Franklin Institute at that time, including Prof. Elihu Thomson, examined the merits of existing dynamos and reported on the best among them: "The Gramme machine is the most economical way to convert mechanical energy into electricity; it uses 38 to 41 percent of the mechanical work produced in the arc, after accounting for friction and air resistance." They also noted that the Brush arc lighting machine "produces useful work in the luminous arc equivalent to 31 percent of the mechanical power used, or 38.5 percent after friction is considered." Commercial prospects were impossible given such low efficiency, and Mr. Edison understood he would need to enhance the dynamo himself to get a better machine. At that time, the scientific community was embroiled in a debate about the external and internal resistance of a circuit containing a generator. Discussing the topic, Mr. Jehl, in his biographical notes, states: "While this debate was raging in scientific publications, and confusion and criticism seemed at their peak, Edison and Upton thoroughly examined this issue, with Edison declaring he did not plan to establish a distribution system where external resistance would equal internal resistance. He said he aimed to do the opposite; he wanted high external resistance and low internal resistance. He emphasized that he wanted to sell energy outside the station rather than waste it in the dynamo and conductors, where it generated no profit.... Nowadays, when Edison's ideas are commonly accepted and applied in all modern distribution systems, it's remarkable to recall that when these concepts were first introduced, they faced fierce opposition from the general public." Edison, experienced with batteries in telegraph systems, could not accept the notion that any substitute generator of electrical energy could be effective if it consumed half of its potential output before performing an equal amount of external work.
Undaunted by the dicta of contemporaneous science, Mr. Edison attacked the dynamo problem with his accustomed vigor and thoroughness. He chose the drum form for his armature, and experimented with different kinds of iron. Cores were made of cast iron, others of forged iron; and still others of sheets of iron of various thicknesses separated from each other by paper or paint. These cores were then allowed to run in an excited field, and after a given time their temperature was measured and noted. By such practical methods Edison found that the thin, laminated cores of sheet iron gave the least heat, and had the least amount of wasteful eddy currents. His experiments and ideas on magnetism at that period were far in advance of the time. His work and tests regarding magnetism were repeated later on by Hopkinson and Kapp, who then elucidated the whole theory mathematically by means of formulae and constants. Before this, however, Edison had attained these results by pioneer work, founded on his original reasoning, and utilized them in the construction of his dynamo, thus revolutionizing the art of building such machines.
Unfazed by the prevailing scientific beliefs of his time, Mr. Edison tackled the dynamo problem with his usual energy and thoroughness. He opted for the drum shape for his armature and experimented with various types of iron. Some cores were made of cast iron, others of forged iron, and some were made from sheets of iron of different thicknesses, separated by paper or paint. These cores were then tested in an energized field, and after some time, their temperature was measured and recorded. Through these practical methods, Edison discovered that the thin, laminated cores of sheet iron produced the least heat and generated the fewest wasteful eddy currents. His experiments and ideas on magnetism were well ahead of their time. Later, Hopkinson and Kapp replicated his work and explained the entire theory mathematically using formulas and constants. However, before this, Edison had achieved these results through groundbreaking work based on his original thinking, and he applied them in building his dynamo, thus transforming the art of constructing such machines.
After thorough investigation of the magnetic qualities of different kinds of iron, Edison began to make a study of winding the cores, first determining the electromotive force generated per turn of wire at various speeds in fields of different intensities. He also considered various forms and shapes for the armature, and by methodical and systematic research obtained the data and best conditions upon which he could build his generator. In the field magnets of his dynamo he constructed the cores and yoke of forged iron having a very large cross-section, which was a new thing in those days. Great attention was also paid to all the joints, which were smoothed down so as to make a perfect magnetic contact. The Edison dynamo, with its large masses of iron, was a vivid contrast to the then existing types with their meagre quantities of the ferric element. Edison also made tests on his field magnets by slowly raising the strength of the exciting current, so that he obtained figures similar to those shown by a magnetic curve, and in this way found where saturation commenced, and where it was useless to expend more current on the field. If he had asked Upton at the time to formulate the results of his work in this direction, for publication, he would have anticipated the historic work on magnetism that was executed by the two other investigators; Hopkinson and Kapp, later on.
After thoroughly investigating the magnetic properties of different types of iron, Edison started studying how to wind the cores. He first figured out the electromotive force generated per turn of wire at various speeds in fields of different strengths. He also looked at different forms and designs for the armature and, through careful and organized research, collected the data and optimal conditions needed to build his generator. For the field magnets of his dynamo, he constructed the cores and yoke from forged iron with a very large cross-section, which was innovative at that time. He paid close attention to all the joints, smoothing them to ensure perfect magnetic contact. The Edison dynamo, with its large amounts of iron, stood in stark contrast to the existing models, which used minimal iron. Edison also tested his field magnets by gradually increasing the strength of the exciting current, allowing him to obtain figures similar to those on a magnetic curve. This helped him identify where saturation began and where further current in the field would be pointless. If he had asked Upton at the time to summarize the results of his work for publication, he would have anticipated the groundbreaking research on magnetism that would later be done by other researchers like Hopkinson and Kapp.
The laboratory note-books of the period bear abundant evidence of the systematic and searching nature of these experiments and investigations, in the hundreds of pages of notes, sketches, calculations, and tables made at the time by Edison, Upton, Batchelor, Jehl, and by others who from time to time were intrusted with special experiments to elucidate some particular point. Mr. Jehl says: "The experiments on armature-winding were also very interesting. Edison had a number of small wooden cores made, at both ends of which we inserted little brass nails, and we wound the wooden cores with twine as if it were wire on an armature. In this way we studied armature-winding, and had matches where each of us had a core, while bets were made as to who would be the first to finish properly and correctly a certain kind of winding. Care had to be taken that the wound core corresponded to the direction of the current, supposing it were placed in a field and revolved. After Edison had decided this question, Upton made drawings and tables from which the real armatures were wound and connected to the commutator. To a student of to-day all this seems simple, but in those days the art of constructing dynamos was about as dark as air navigation is at present.... Edison also improved the armature by dividing it and the commutator into a far greater number of sections than up to that time had been the practice. He was also the first to use mica in insulating the commutator sections from each other."
The lab notebooks from that time clearly show the thorough and detailed nature of these experiments and investigations, featuring hundreds of pages of notes, sketches, calculations, and tables created by Edison, Upton, Batchelor, Jehl, and others who were occasionally given special experiments to clarify specific points. Mr. Jehl says: "The experiments on armature winding were also really interesting. Edison had a number of small wooden cores made, and at both ends, we inserted little brass nails, then we wound the wooden cores with twine as if it were wire on an armature. This way, we studied armature winding and had contests to see who could finish a specific type of winding properly and correctly first. We had to make sure that the wound core matched the direction of the current, assuming it was placed in a field and spun. After Edison figured this out, Upton created drawings and tables from which the real armatures were wound and connected to the commutator. To a modern student, all this seems simple, but back then, the art of building dynamos was as murky as air navigation is today.... Edison also enhanced the armature by breaking it and the commutator into many more sections than what was common at the time. He was also the first to use mica to insulate the commutator sections from one another."
In the mean time, during the progress of the investigations on the dynamo, word had gone out to the world that Edison expected to invent a generator of greater efficiency than any that existed at the time. Again he was assailed and ridiculed by the technical press, for had not the foremost electricians and physicists of Europe and America worked for years on the production of dynamos and arc lamps as they then existed? Even though this young man at Menlo Park had done some wonderful things for telegraphy and telephony; even if he had recorded and reproduced human speech, he had his limitations, and could not upset the settled dictum of science that the internal resistance must equal the external resistance.
In the meantime, while the investigations on the dynamo were underway, news spread that Edison planned to create a generator that was more efficient than any available at that time. Once again, he faced criticism and mockery from the technical press, as the leading electricians and physicists in Europe and America had spent years developing dynamos and arc lamps as they existed then. Even though this young man at Menlo Park had achieved remarkable advancements in telegraphy and telephony; even if he had recorded and reproduced human speech, he had his limitations and couldn’t challenge the established scientific principle that internal resistance must equal external resistance.
Such was the trend of public opinion at the time, but "after Mr. Kruesi had finished the first practical dynamo, and after Mr. Upton had tested it thoroughly and verified his figures and results several times—for he also was surprised—Edison was able to tell the world that he had made a generator giving an efficiency of 90 per cent." Ninety per cent. as against 40 per cent. was a mighty hit, and the world would not believe it. Criticism and argument were again at their height, while Upton, as Edison's duellist, was kept busy replying to private and public challenges of the fact.... "The tremendous progress of the world in the last quarter of a century, owing to the revolution caused by the all-conquering march of 'Heavy Current Engineering,' is the outcome of Edison's work at Menlo Park that raised the efficiency of the dynamo from 40 per cent. to 90 per cent."
Such was the trend of public opinion at the time, but "after Mr. Kruesi had finished the first practical dynamo, and after Mr. Upton had tested it thoroughly and confirmed his figures and results several times—for he was also surprised—Edison was able to announce to the world that he had made a generator with 90 percent efficiency." Ninety percent compared to 40 percent was a huge achievement, and the world found it hard to believe. Criticism and debate were at their peak again, while Upton, as Edison's defender, was kept busy responding to both private and public challenges regarding the facts... "The incredible progress of the world in the last quarter of a century, due to the revolution brought about by the unstoppable rise of 'Heavy Current Engineering,' is the result of Edison's work at Menlo Park that increased the efficiency of the dynamo from 40 percent to 90 percent."
Mr. Upton sums it all up very precisely in his remarks upon this period: "What has now been made clear by accurate nomenclature was then very foggy in the text-books. Mr. Edison had completely grasped the effect of subdivision of circuits, and the influence of wires leading to such subdivisions, when it was most difficult to express what he knew in technical language. I remember distinctly when Mr. Edison gave me the problem of placing a motor in circuit in multiple arc with a fixed resistance; and I had to work out the problem entirely, as I could find no prior solution. There was nothing I could find bearing upon the counter electromotive force of the armature, and the effect of the resistance of the armature on the work given out by the armature. It was a wonderful experience to have problems given me out of the intuitions of a great mind, based on enormous experience in practical work, and applying to new lines of progress. One of the main impressions left upon me after knowing Mr. Edison for many years is the marvellous accuracy of his guesses. He will see the general nature of a result long before it can be reached by mathematical calculation. His greatness was always to be clearly seen when difficulties arose. They always made him cheerful, and started him thinking; and very soon would come a line of suggestions which would not end until the difficulty was met and overcome, or found insurmountable. I have often felt that Mr. Edison got himself purposely into trouble by premature publications and otherwise, so that he would have a full incentive to get himself out of the trouble."
Mr. Upton sums it all up very precisely in his remarks about this period: "What is now clearly defined by accurate terminology was once quite unclear in the textbooks. Mr. Edison completely understood the effect of circuit subdivision and the impact of wires leading to those subdivisions, even when it was challenging to express what he knew in technical terms. I vividly remember when Mr. Edison assigned me the task of wiring a motor in a multiple-arc configuration with a fixed resistance; I had to solve the entire problem on my own since I couldn’t find a previous solution. There was nothing available addressing the counter electromotive force of the armature or the effect of the armature’s resistance on its output. It was an amazing experience to be given problems derived from the insights of a brilliant mind, rooted in extensive practical experience, and applying to new avenues of advancement. One of the lasting impressions I have after knowing Mr. Edison for many years is the incredible accuracy of his intuitions. He could anticipate the general nature of a result long before it could be calculated mathematically. His greatness was always evident when challenges arose. They would make him cheerful and spark his thinking; soon, he would generate a series of suggestions that wouldn’t stop until the issue was resolved or deemed unsolvable. I often felt that Mr. Edison intentionally got himself into challenging situations through premature publications and other means so he would have a strong motivation to find a solution."
This chapter may well end with a statement from Mr. Jehl, shrewd and observant, as a participator in all the early work of the development of the Edison lighting system: "Those who were gathered around him in the old Menlo Park laboratory enjoyed his confidence, and he theirs. Nor was this confidence ever abused. He was respected with a respect which only great men can obtain, and he never showed by any word or act that he was their employer in a sense that would hurt the feelings, as is often the case in the ordinary course of business life. He conversed, argued, and disputed with us all as if he were a colleague on the same footing. It was his winning ways and manners that attached us all so loyally to his side, and made us ever ready with a boundless devotion to execute any request or desire." Thus does a great magnet, run through a heap of sand and filings, exert its lines of force and attract irresistibly to itself the iron and steel particles that are its affinity, and having sifted them out, leaving the useless dust behind, hold them to itself with responsive tenacity.
This chapter might end with a statement from Mr. Jehl, who was insightful and observant, and was involved in the early development of the Edison lighting system: "Those of us gathered around him in the old Menlo Park lab shared his trust, and he shared ours. This trust was never misused. He earned a respect that only great individuals can achieve, and he never indicated through any words or actions that he was their boss in a way that would upset anyone, as often happens in typical business settings. He talked, argued, and debated with us as if we were equals. His friendly demeanor and charm made us all feel loyal to him and always eager to fulfill any request or desire." Just like a strong magnet sifts through a pile of sand and metal shavings, pulling in the iron and steel particles that are drawn to it, and leaving the useless dust behind, he held on to us with a connection that was hard to break.
CHAPTER XIII
A WORLD-HUNT FOR FILAMENT MATERIAL
IN writing about the old experimenting days at Menlo Park, Mr. F. R. Upton says: "Edison's day is twenty-four hours long, for he has always worked whenever there was anything to do, whether day or night, and carried a force of night workers, so that his experiments could go on continually. If he wanted material, he always made it a principle to have it at once, and never hesitated to use special messengers to get it. I remember in the early days of the electric light he wanted a mercury pump for exhausting the lamps. He sent me to Princeton to get it. I got back to Metuchen late in the day, and had to carry the pump over to the laboratory on my back that evening, set it up, and work all night and the next day getting results."
In writing about the old experimenting days at Menlo Park, Mr. F. R. Upton says: "Edison's day lasts twenty-four hours because he always worked whenever there was something to do, whether it was day or night. He even had a team of night workers so his experiments could run continuously. If he needed materials, he made it a rule to get them immediately and didn't hesitate to use special messengers for that. I remember when he needed a mercury pump for exhausting the lamps during the early days of electric light. He sent me to Princeton to get it. I returned to Metuchen late in the day and had to carry the pump on my back to the laboratory that evening, set it up, and worked all night and the next day to get results."
This characteristic principle of obtaining desired material in the quickest and most positive way manifested itself in the search that Edison instituted for the best kind of bamboo for lamp filaments, immediately after the discovery related in a preceding chapter. It is doubtful whether, in the annals of scientific research and experiment, there is anything quite analogous to the story of this search and the various expeditions that went out from the Edison laboratory in 1880 and subsequent years, to scour the earth for a material so apparently simple as a homogeneous strip of bamboo, or other similar fibre. Prolonged and exhaustive experiment, microscopic examination, and an intimate knowledge of the nature of wood and plant fibres, however, had led Edison to the conclusion that bamboo or similar fibrous filaments were more suitable than anything else then known for commercial incandescent lamps, and he wanted the most perfect for that purpose. Hence, the quickest way was to search the tropics until the proper material was found.
This key principle of getting the desired material in the fastest and most effective way showed itself in Edison's quest for the best type of bamboo for lamp filaments, right after the discovery mentioned in the previous chapter. It’s hard to find anything in the history of scientific research and experimentation that’s quite like this search and the various trips that left the Edison laboratory in 1880 and the following years to look for a material as seemingly simple as a uniform piece of bamboo or another similar fiber. Extensive and detailed experiments, microscopic studies, and a deep understanding of the properties of wood and plant fibers had led Edison to believe that bamboo or similar fibrous filaments were more suitable than anything else known at the time for commercial incandescent lamps, and he wanted the best for that purpose. So, the fastest way was to search the tropics until the right material was found.
The first emissary chosen for this purpose was the late William H. Moore, of Rahway, New Jersey, who left New York in the summer of 1880, bound for China and Japan, these being the countries preeminently noted for the production of abundant species of bamboo. On arrival in the East he quickly left the cities behind and proceeded into the interior, extending his search far into the more remote country districts, collecting specimens on his way, and devoting much time to the study of the bamboo, and in roughly testing the relative value of its fibre in canes of one, two, three, four, and five year growths. Great bales of samples were sent to Edison, and after careful tests a certain variety and growth of Japanese bamboo was determined to be the most satisfactory material for filaments that had been found. Mr. Moore, who was continuing his searches in that country, was instructed to arrange for the cultivation and shipment of regular supplies of this particular species. Arrangements to this end were accordingly made with a Japanese farmer, who began to make immediate shipments, and who subsequently displayed so much ingenuity in fertilizing and cross-fertilizing that the homogeneity of the product was constantly improved. The use of this bamboo for Edison lamp filaments was continued for many years.
The first envoy selected for this task was the late William H. Moore from Rahway, New Jersey. He left New York in the summer of 1880, headed for China and Japan, both renowned for their rich variety of bamboo. Upon reaching the East, he quickly departed from the cities and ventured into the countryside, exploring remote areas and collecting samples along the way. He spent a lot of time studying bamboo and roughly assessing the value of its fiber from canes that were one, two, three, four, and five years old. Large bales of samples were sent to Edison, and after thorough testing, a specific type and age of Japanese bamboo was found to be the best material for filaments. Mr. Moore, who continued his search in the region, was tasked with organizing the cultivation and shipment of consistent supplies of this particular species. He made arrangements with a Japanese farmer, who started sending shipments right away and showcased impressive creativity in fertilizing and cross-fertilizing, which continually enhanced the quality of the product. The use of this bamboo for Edison lamp filaments lasted for many years.
Although Mr. Moore did not meet with the exciting adventures of some subsequent explorers, he encountered numerous difficulties and novel experiences in his many months of travel through the hinterland of Japan and China. The attitude toward foreigners thirty years ago was not as friendly as it has since become, but Edison, as usual, had made a happy choice of messengers, as Mr. Moore's good nature and diplomacy attested. These qualities, together with his persistence and perseverance and faculty of intelligent discrimination in the matter of fibres, helped to make his mission successful, and gave to him the honor of being the one who found the bamboo which was adopted for use as filaments in commercial Edison lamps.
Although Mr. Moore didn't have the thrilling adventures of some later explorers, he faced many challenges and unique experiences during his extended travels through rural Japan and China. The attitude towards foreigners thirty years ago was not as welcoming as it has become, but Edison, as always, chose his messengers wisely, as shown by Mr. Moore’s good nature and diplomacy. These qualities, along with his persistence, determination, and ability to intelligently assess different fibers, contributed to his mission's success and earned him the honor of discovering the bamboo that was used as filaments in commercial Edison lamps.
Although Edison had satisfied himself that bamboo furnished the most desirable material thus far discovered for incandescent-lamp filaments, he felt that in some part of the world there might be found a natural product of the same general character that would furnish a still more perfect and homogeneous material. In his study of this subject, and during the prosecution of vigorous and searching inquiries in various directions, he learned that Mr. John C. Brauner, then residing in Brooklyn, New York, had an expert knowledge of indigenous plants of the particular kind desired. During the course of a geological survey which he had made for the Brazilian Government, Mr. Brauner had examined closely the various species of palms which grow plentifully in that country, and of them there was one whose fibres he thought would be just what Edison wanted.
Although Edison was convinced that bamboo provided the best material discovered so far for incandescent lamp filaments, he believed that somewhere in the world there might be a natural product of a similar type that could offer an even more ideal and uniform material. In his exploration of this topic, and while conducting thorough and intense inquiries in different directions, he found out that Mr. John C. Brauner, who was living in Brooklyn, New York, had expert knowledge of indigenous plants of the specific type he needed. During a geological survey he conducted for the Brazilian Government, Mr. Brauner had closely examined the various species of palms that grow abundantly in that country, and he thought there was one whose fibers would be exactly what Edison was looking for.
Accordingly, Mr. Brauner was sent for and dispatched to Brazil in December, 1880, to search for and send samples of this and such other palms, fibres, grasses, and canes as, in his judgment, would be suitable for the experiments then being carried on at Menlo Park. Landing at Para, he crossed over into the Amazonian province, and thence proceeded through the heart of the country, making his way by canoe on the rivers and their tributaries, and by foot into the forests and marshes of a vast and almost untrodden wilderness. In this manner Mr. Brauner traversed about two thousand miles of the comparatively unknown interior of Southern Brazil, and procured a large variety of fibrous specimens, which he shipped to Edison a few months later. When these fibres arrived in the United States they were carefully tested and a few of them found suitable but not superior to the Japanese bamboo, which was then being exclusively used in the manufacture of commercial Edison lamps.
Mr. Brauner was called in December 1880 and sent to Brazil to find and collect samples of palms, fibers, grasses, and canes that he thought would be suitable for the experiments taking place at Menlo Park. After arriving in Para, he traveled into the Amazon province and continued through the heart of the country, navigating by canoe along the rivers and their tributaries, and on foot into the forests and marshes of a vast, mostly untouched wilderness. In this way, Mr. Brauner covered about two thousand miles of the relatively unknown interior of Southern Brazil, gathering a wide variety of fibrous samples, which he shipped to Edison a few months later. When these fibers arrived in the United States, they were carefully tested, and a few were found suitable, but they were not better than the Japanese bamboo, which was then exclusively used for making commercial Edison lamps.
Later on Edison sent out an expedition to explore the wilds of Cuba and Jamaica. A two months' investigation of the latter island revealed a variety of bamboo growths, of which a great number of specimens were obtained and shipped to Menlo Park; but on careful test they were found inferior to the Japanese bamboo, and hence rejected. The exploration of the glades and swamps of Florida by three men extended over a period of five months in a minute search for fibrous woods of the palmetto species. A great variety was found, and over five hundred boxes of specimens were shipped to the laboratory from time to time, but none of them tested out with entirely satisfactory results.
Later, Edison sent a team to explore the jungles of Cuba and Jamaica. A two-month investigation of Jamaica uncovered various types of bamboo, and many samples were collected and sent to Menlo Park; however, upon testing, they were found to be inferior to Japanese bamboo and were therefore discarded. Three men spent five months exploring the glades and swamps of Florida, meticulously searching for fibrous woods from the palmetto species. They discovered a wide variety and shipped over five hundred boxes of samples to the lab periodically, but none produced entirely satisfactory results.
The use of Japanese bamboo for carbon filaments was therefore continued in the manufacture of lamps, although an incessant search was maintained for a still more perfect material. The spirit of progress, so pervasive in Edison's character, led him, however, to renew his investigations further afield by sending out two other men to examine the bamboo and similar growths of those parts of South America not covered by Mr. Brauner. These two men were Frank McGowan and C. F. Hanington, both of whom had been for nearly seven years in the employ of the Edison Electric Light Company in New York. The former was a stocky, rugged Irishman, possessing the native shrewdness and buoyancy of his race, coupled with undaunted courage and determination; and the latter was a veteran of the Civil War, with some knowledge of forest and field, acquired as a sportsman. They left New York in September, 1887, arriving in due time at Para, proceeding thence twenty-three hundred miles up the Amazon River to Iquitos. Nothing of an eventful nature occurred during this trip, but on arrival at Iquitos the two men separated; Mr. McGowan to explore on foot and by canoe in Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia, while Mr. Hanington returned by the Amazon River to Para. Thence Hanington went by steamer to Montevideo, and by similar conveyance up the River de la Plata and through Uruguay, Argentine, and Paraguay to the southernmost part of Brazil, collecting a large number of specimens of palms and grasses.
The use of Japanese bamboo for carbon filaments continued in lamp manufacturing, although there was a constant search for an even better material. However, the spirit of progress that was a core part of Edison’s character drove him to expand his research by sending two other men to examine bamboo and similar plants in areas of South America that Mr. Brauner hadn’t covered. These two men were Frank McGowan and C. F. Hanington, both of whom had worked for nearly seven years at the Edison Electric Light Company in New York. McGowan was a sturdy, rugged Irishman with the natural cleverness and energy of his heritage, combined with fearless courage and determination. Hanington, on the other hand, was a Civil War veteran with some knowledge of the outdoors gained from his experience as a sportsman. They left New York in September 1887, reaching Para and then traveling twenty-three hundred miles up the Amazon River to Iquitos. Nothing particularly eventful happened during this journey, but upon arriving at Iquitos, the two men went their separate ways; McGowan set out to explore on foot and by canoe in Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia, while Hanington returned down the Amazon River to Para. From there, Hanington took a steamer to Montevideo and then traveled via similar means up the River de la Plata through Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay to the southernmost part of Brazil, collecting a large number of palm and grass specimens along the way.
The adventures of Mr. McGowan, after leaving Iquitos, would fill a book if related in detail. The object of the present narrative and the space at the authors' disposal, however, do not permit of more than a brief mention of his experiences. His first objective point was Quito, about five hundred miles away, which he proposed to reach on foot and by means of canoeing on the Napo River through a wild and comparatively unknown country teeming with tribes of hostile natives. The dangers of the expedition were pictured to him in glowing colors, but spurning prophecies of dire disaster, he engaged some native Indians and a canoe and started on his explorations, reaching Quito in eighty-seven days, after a thorough search of the country on both sides of the Napo River. From Quito he went to Guayaquil, from there by steamer to Buenaventura, and thence by rail, twelve miles, to Cordova. From this point he set out on foot to explore the Cauca Valley and the Cordilleras.
The adventures of Mr. McGowan after leaving Iquitos could easily fill a book if described in detail. However, the focus of this narrative and the space available to the author only allow for a brief overview of his experiences. His first target was Quito, roughly five hundred miles away, which he planned to reach on foot and by canoeing on the Napo River through a wild and mostly unknown region filled with tribes of hostile natives. The dangers of the expedition were vividly portrayed to him, but dismissing dire predictions of disaster, he hired some local Indians and secured a canoe to start his journey. He arrived in Quito in eighty-seven days, after thoroughly exploring the areas along both sides of the Napo River. From Quito, he traveled to Guayaquil, then took a steamer to Buenaventura, and from there, a twelve-mile train ride to Cordova. From this point, he set out on foot to explore the Cauca Valley and the Cordilleras.
Mr. McGowan found in these regions a great variety of bamboo, small and large, some species growing seventy-five to one hundred feet in height, and from six to nine inches in diameter. He collected a large number of specimens, which were subsequently sent to Orange for Edison's examination. After about fifteen months of exploration attended by much hardship and privation, deserted sometimes by treacherous guides, twice laid low by fevers, occasionally in peril from Indian attacks, wild animals and poisonous serpents, tormented by insect pests, endangered by floods, one hundred and nineteen days without meat, ninety-eight days without taking off his clothes, Mr. McGowan returned to America, broken in health but having faithfully fulfilled the commission intrusted to him. The Evening Sun, New York, obtained an interview with him at that time, and in its issue of May 2, 1889, gave more than a page to a brief story of his interesting adventures, and then commented editorially upon them, as follows:
Mr. McGowan discovered a wide variety of bamboo in these areas, both small and large, with some species reaching heights of seventy-five to one hundred feet and diameters of six to nine inches. He gathered many specimens, which were later sent to Orange for Edison's examination. After about fifteen months of exploration, filled with hardship and struggle, sometimes betrayed by untrustworthy guides, twice hit by fevers, occasionally in danger from Indian attacks, wild animals, and poisonous snakes, plagued by insect pests, and threatened by floods—spending one hundred and nineteen days without meat and ninety-eight days without taking off his clothes—Mr. McGowan returned to America, in poor health but having faithfully completed the mission he was given. The Evening Sun in New York secured an interview with him at the time, and in its May 2, 1889 issue, dedicated more than a page to a brief account of his fascinating adventures, followed by an editorial commentary on them, as follows:
"A ROMANCE OF SCIENCE"
"A Sci-Fi Romance"
"The narrative given elsewhere in the Evening Sun of the wanderings of Edison's missionary of science, Mr. Frank McGowan, furnishes a new proof that the romances of real life surpass any that the imagination can frame.
"The story shared in the Evening Sun about the journeys of Edison's science ambassador, Mr. Frank McGowan, provides fresh evidence that the adventures of real life are more captivating than anything our imagination can create."
"In pursuit of a substance that should meet the requirements of the Edison incandescent lamp, Mr. McGowan penetrated the wilderness of the Amazon, and for a year defied its fevers, beasts, reptiles, and deadly insects in his quest of a material so precious that jealous Nature has hidden it in her most secret fastnesses.
"In search of a material that would fulfill the needs of the Edison incandescent lamp, Mr. McGowan ventured into the Amazon jungle and spent a year facing its fevers, wild animals, reptiles, and deadly insects in his quest for a resource so valuable that envious Nature has tucked it away in her most hidden corners."
"No hero of mythology or fable ever dared such dragons to rescue some captive goddess as did this dauntless champion of civilization. Theseus, or Siegfried, or any knight of the fairy books might envy the victories of Edison's irresistible lieutenant.
"No hero from mythology or fairy tales ever faced such dragons to save a captured goddess like this fearless champion of civilization. Theseus, Siegfried, or any knight from storybooks would be jealous of the achievements of Edison's unstoppable lieutenant."
"As a sample story of adventure, Mr. McGowan's narrative is a marvel fit to be classed with the historic journeyings of the greatest travellers. But it gains immensely in interest when we consider that it succeeded in its scientific purpose. The mysterious bamboo was discovered, and large quantities of it were procured and brought to the Wizard's laboratory, there to suffer another wondrous change and then to light up our pleasure-haunts and our homes with a gentle radiance."
"As a sample adventure story, Mr. McGowan's narrative is amazing enough to be compared with the historic journeys of the greatest travelers. But it becomes even more interesting when we realize that it achieved its scientific goal. The mysterious bamboo was found, and large amounts of it were collected and taken to the Wizard's lab, where it underwent another incredible transformation and then illuminated our leisure spots and homes with a soft glow."
A further, though rather sad, interest attaches to the McGowan story, for only a short time had elapsed after his return to America when he disappeared suddenly and mysteriously, and in spite of long-continued and strenuous efforts to obtain some light on the subject, no clew or trace of him was ever found. He was a favorite among the Edison "oldtimers," and his memory is still cherished, for when some of the "boys" happen to get together, as they occasionally do, some one is almost sure to "wonder what became of poor 'Mac.'" He was last seen at Mouquin's famous old French restaurant on Fulton Street, New York, where he lunched with one of the authors of this book and the late Luther Stieringer. He sat with them for two or three hours discussing his wonderful trip, and telling some fascinating stories of adventure. Then the party separated at the Ann Street door of the restaurant, after making plans to secure the narrative in more detailed form for subsequent use—and McGowan has not been seen from that hour to this. The trail of the explorer was more instantly lost in New York than in the vast recesses of the Amazon swamps.
A further, though rather sad, interest surrounds the McGowan story, for only a short time had passed after his return to America when he suddenly and mysteriously disappeared. Despite prolonged and intense efforts to uncover what happened, no clue or trace of him was ever found. He was a favorite among the Edison "old-timers," and his memory is still treasured. Whenever the "boys" get together, which they occasionally do, someone is almost guaranteed to "wonder what happened to poor 'Mac.'" He was last seen at Mouquin's famous old French restaurant on Fulton Street in New York, where he had lunch with one of the authors of this book and the late Luther Stieringer. He spent two or three hours with them discussing his amazing trip and sharing some captivating adventure stories. Then the group parted at the Ann Street door of the restaurant after making plans to document his narrative in more detail for future use—and McGowan has not been seen since that moment. The explorer's trail vanished more quickly in New York than in the vast depths of the Amazon swamps.
The next and last explorer whom Edison sent out in search of natural fibres was Mr. James Ricalton, of Maplewood, New Jersey, a school-principal, a well-known traveller, and an ardent student of natural science. Mr. Ricalton's own story of his memorable expedition is so interesting as to be worthy of repetition here:
The next and final explorer that Edison sent out to look for natural fibers was Mr. James Ricalton from Maplewood, New Jersey. He was a school principal, a well-known traveler, and a passionate student of natural science. Mr. Ricalton's own account of his memorable expedition is so fascinating that it deserves to be shared here:
"A village schoolmaster is not unaccustomed to door-rappings; for the steps of belligerent mothers are often thitherward bent seeking redress for conjured wrongs to their darling boobies.
"A village schoolmaster is used to people knocking on his door; the steps of angry mothers often head his way, seeking justice for imagined wrongs done to their beloved children."
"It was a bewildering moment, therefore, to the Maplewood teacher when, in answering a rap at the door one afternoon, he found, instead of an irate mother, a messenger from the laboratory of the world's greatest inventor bearing a letter requesting an audience a few hours later.
It was a confusing moment for the Maplewood teacher when, one afternoon, he answered a knock at the door and found, instead of an angry mother, a messenger from the lab of the world's greatest inventor with a letter asking for a meeting a few hours later.
"Being the teacher to whom reference is made, I am now quite willing to confess that for the remainder of that afternoon, less than a problem in Euclid would have been sufficient to disqualify me for the remaining scholastic duties of the hour. I felt it, of course, to be no small honor for a humble teacher to be called to the sanctum of Thomas A. Edison. The letter, however, gave no intimation of the nature of the object for which I had been invited to appear before Mr. Edison....
"Being the teacher mentioned, I’m now more than happy to admit that for the rest of that afternoon, even a simple problem in Euclid would have been enough to disqualify me from my remaining teaching duties for the hour. I certainly felt it was quite an honor for a modest teacher to be summoned to the private office of Thomas A. Edison. The letter, however, didn’t indicate what the purpose was for which I had been invited to meet Mr. Edison...."
"When I was presented to Mr. Edison his way of setting forth the mission he had designated for me was characteristic of how a great mind conceives vast undertakings and commands great things in few words. At this time Mr. Edison had discovered that the fibre of a certain bamboo afforded a very desirable carbon for the electric lamp, and the variety of bamboo used was a product of Japan. It was his belief that in other parts of the world other and superior varieties might be found, and to that end he had dispatched explorers to bamboo regions in the valleys of the great South American rivers, where specimens were found of extraordinary quality; but the locality in which these specimens were found was lost in the limitless reaches of those great river-bottoms. The great necessity for more durable carbons became a desideratum so urgent that the tireless inventor decided to commission another explorer to search the tropical jungles of the Orient.
"When I met Mr. Edison, his way of outlining the mission he had set for me was typical of how a brilliant mind thinks about big projects and expresses grand ideas in just a few words. At that time, Mr. Edison had discovered that the fiber of a certain type of bamboo produced an excellent carbon for the electric lamp, and the bamboo he was using came from Japan. He believed that there might be other, even better varieties in different parts of the world, so he sent explorers to bamboo regions in the valleys of the major South American rivers, where they found specimens of exceptional quality. However, the exact location of these specimens was lost in the vast expanses of those river bottoms. The urgent need for more durable carbons became so pressing that the relentless inventor decided to send another explorer to search the tropical jungles of the East."
"This brings me then to the first meeting of Edison, when he set forth substantially as follows, as I remember it twenty years ago, the purpose for which he had called me from my scholastic duties. With a quizzical gleam in his eye, he said: 'I want a man to ransack all the tropical jungles of the East to find a better fibre for my lamp; I expect it to be found in the palm or bamboo family. How would you like that job?' Suiting my reply to his love of brevity and dispatch, I said, 'That would suit me.' 'Can you go to-morrow?' was his next question. 'Well, Mr. Edison, I must first of all get a leave of absence from my Board of Education, and assist the board to secure a substitute for the time of my absence. How long will it take, Mr. Edison?' 'How can I tell? Maybe six months, and maybe five years; no matter how long, find it.' He continued: 'I sent a man to South America to find what I want; he found it; but lost the place where he found it, so he might as well never have found it at all.' Hereat I was enjoined to proceed forthwith to court the Board of Education for a leave of absence, which I did successfully, the board considering that a call so important and honorary was entitled to their unqualified favor, which they generously granted.
This brings me to my first meeting with Edison, where he stated quite clearly, as I remember it from twenty years ago, the reason he had summoned me from my teaching responsibilities. With a playful twinkle in his eye, he said, "I need someone to search through all the tropical jungles of the East to find a better fiber for my lamp; I believe it can be found in the palm or bamboo family. How would you like that job?" Keeping my response brief to match his style, I replied, "That sounds good to me." His next question was, "Can you go tomorrow?" I explained, "Well, Mr. Edison, I first need to get a leave of absence from my Board of Education and help the board find a substitute for my time away. How long will that take?" He replied, "How can I know? It could take six months or even five years; no matter how long it takes, just find it." He went on, "I sent someone to South America to locate what I want; he found it but lost the place where he discovered it, so it was as if he hadn’t found it at all." At that point, I was urged to immediately seek leave from the Board of Education, which I did successfully, as the board deemed such an important and prestigious request worthy of their full support, which they generously granted.
"I reported to Mr. Edison on the following day, when he instructed me to come to the laboratory at once to learn all the details of drawing and carbonizing fibres, which it would be necessary to do in the Oriental jungles. This I did, and, in the mean time, a set of suitable tools for this purpose had been ordered to be made in the laboratory. As soon as I learned my new trade, which I accomplished in a few days, Mr. Edison directed me to the library of the laboratory to occupy a few days in studying the geography of the Orient and, particularly, in drawing maps of the tributaries of the Ganges, the Irrawaddy, and the Brahmaputra rivers, and other regions which I expected to explore.
I reported to Mr. Edison the next day, and he told me to come to the lab right away to learn all about drawing and carbonizing fibers, which I would need to do in the jungles of the East. I did that, and in the meantime, a set of suitable tools for this purpose was ordered to be made in the lab. Once I learned my new skills, which I managed in a few days, Mr. Edison sent me to the lab's library to spend a few days studying the geography of the East, especially creating maps of the tributaries of the Ganges, Irrawaddy, and Brahmaputra rivers, as well as other areas I planned to explore.
"It was while thus engaged that Mr. Edison came to me one day and said: 'If you will go up to the house' (his palatial home not far away) 'and look behind the sofa in the library you will find a joint of bamboo, a specimen of that found in South America; bring it down and make a study of it; if you find something equal to that I will be satisfied.' At the home I was guided to the library by an Irish servant-woman, to whom I communicated my knowledge of the definite locality of the sample joint. She plunged her arm, bare and herculean, behind the aforementioned sofa, and holding aloft a section of wood, called out in a mood of discovery: 'Is that it?' Replying in the affirmative, she added, under an impulse of innocent divination that whatever her wizard master laid hands upon could result in nothing short of an invention, 'Sure, sor, and what's he going to invint out o' that?'
While I was working, Mr. Edison came to me one day and said: "If you go up to the house" (his impressive home not far away) "and look behind the sofa in the library, you'll find a piece of bamboo, a sample from South America; bring it down and study it; if you find something as good as that, I’ll be satisfied." At the house, an Irish housekeeper took me to the library, and I told her exactly where to look for the piece. She reached her strong bare arm behind the sofa and pulled out a chunk of wood, exclaiming in a moment of discovery: "Is this it?" When I confirmed, she added, in a burst of innocent insight, that anything her brilliant master touched could only lead to an invention, "Sure, sir, and what’s he going to invent out of that?"
"My kit of tools made, my maps drawn, my Oriental geography reviewed, I come to the point when matters of immediate departure are discussed; and when I took occasion to mention to my chief that, on the subject of life insurance, underwriters refuse to take any risks on an enterprise so hazardous, Mr. Edison said that, if I did not place too high a valuation on my person, he would take the risk himself. I replied that I was born and bred in New York State, but now that I had become a Jersey man I did not value myself at above fifteen hundred dollars. Edison laughed and said that he would assume the risk, and another point was settled. The next matter was the financing of the trip, about which Mr. Edison asked in a tentative way about the rates to the East. I told him the expense of such a trip could not be determined beforehand in detail, but that I had established somewhat of a reputation for economic travel, and that I did not believe any traveller could surpass me in that respect. He desired no further assurance in that direction, and thereupon ordered a letter of credit made out with authorization to order a second when the first was exhausted. Herein then are set forth in briefest space the preliminaries of a circuit of the globe in quest of fibre.
With my toolkit ready, my maps prepared, and my knowledge of Eastern geography refreshed, I reached the moment when plans for departure were made. When I mentioned to my boss that insurance companies refuse to cover a trip that risky, Mr. Edison said that if I didn’t think too highly of myself, he would take the risk himself. I replied that I was born and raised in New York State, but now as a Jersey guy, I didn't value myself at more than fifteen hundred dollars. Edison laughed and said he would cover the risk, so that was settled. Next, we talked about funding the trip, and Mr. Edison casually inquired about travel costs to the East. I explained that the expenses for such a journey couldn’t be precisely calculated ahead of time, but I had built a bit of a reputation for traveling economically, and I believed no one could outdo me in that area. He didn’t need any more reassurance and then ordered a letter of credit to be prepared, with permission to issue a second one when the first ran out. Here, then, are briefly outlined the initial steps for a globe-circling journey in search of fiber.
"It so happened that the day on which I set out fell on Washington's Birthday, and I suggested to my boys and girls at school that they make a line across the station platform near the school at Maplewood, and from this line I would start eastward around the world, and if good-fortune should bring me back I would meet them from the westward at the same line. As I had often made them 'toe the scratch,' for once they were only too well pleased to have me toe the line for them.
"It just so happened that the day I set out was Washington's Birthday, and I suggested to my students at school that they draw a line across the station platform near the school at Maplewood. From this line, I would begin my journey eastward around the world, and if luck brought me back, I would meet them from the west at the same line. Since I had often made them 'toe the scratch,' this time they were more than happy to let me toe the line for them."
"This was done, and I sailed via England and the Suez Canal to Ceylon, that fair isle to which Sindbad the Sailor made his sixth voyage, picturesquely referred to in history as the 'brightest gem in the British Colonial Crown.' I knew Ceylon to be eminently tropical; I knew it to be rich in many varieties of the bamboo family, which has been called the king of the grasses; and in this family had I most hope of finding the desired fibre. Weeks were spent in this paradisiacal isle. Every part was visited. Native wood craftsmen were offered a premium on every new species brought in, and in this way nearly a hundred species were tested, a greater number than was found in any other country. One of the best specimens tested during the entire trip around the world was found first in Ceylon, although later in Burmah, it being indigenous to the latter country. It is a gigantic tree-grass or reed growing in clumps of from one to two hundred, often twelve inches in diameter, and one hundred and fifty feet high, and known as the giant bamboo (Bambusa gigantia). This giant grass stood the highest test as a carbon, and on account of its extraordinary size and qualities I extend it this special mention. With others who have given much attention to this remarkable reed, I believe that in its manifold uses the bamboo is the world's greatest dendral benefactor.
"This was done, and I traveled through England and the Suez Canal to Ceylon, that beautiful island where Sindbad the Sailor made his sixth voyage, often called the 'brightest gem in the British Colonial Crown' in history. I knew Ceylon was definitely tropical; I knew it was rich in many types of bamboo, which has been dubbed the king of the grasses; and it was within this family that I had the most hope of finding the desired fiber. I spent weeks on this paradise island, visiting every part. I offered local woodworkers a bonus for every new species they brought in, and through this, we tested nearly a hundred species—more than found in any other country. One of the best specimens I discovered during the whole world tour was first found in Ceylon, although it was later seen in Burmah, as it is native to that country. It is a massive tree-like grass or reed growing in clusters of one to two hundred, often twelve inches in diameter, and one hundred fifty feet tall, known as the giant bamboo (Bambusa gigantia). This giant grass performed exceptionally well as a carbon source, and because of its remarkable size and qualities, I want to highlight it specifically. Along with others who have focused on this incredible reed, I believe that with its many uses, bamboo is the world's greatest contributor among trees."
"From Ceylon I proceeded to India, touching the great peninsula first at Cape Comorin, and continuing northward by way of Pondicherry, Madura, and Madras; and thence to the tableland of Bangalore and the Western Ghauts, testing many kinds of wood at every point, but particularly the palm and bamboo families. From the range of the Western Ghauts I went to Bombay and then north by the way of Delhi to Simla, the summer capital of the Himalayas; thence again northward to the headwaters of the Sutlej River, testing everywhere on my way everything likely to afford the desired carbon.
From Ceylon, I traveled to India, first reaching the great peninsula at Cape Comorin, and then heading north through Pondicherry, Madura, and Madras; after that, I moved on to the plateau of Bangalore and the Western Ghats, experimenting with various types of wood at each location, but especially focusing on palm and bamboo. From the Western Ghats, I made my way to Bombay and then north towards Delhi to Simla, the summer capital of the Himalayas; from there, I continued north to the headwaters of the Sutlej River, testing everything along the way that might provide the carbon I needed.
"On returning from the mountains I followed the valleys of the Jumna and the Ganges to Calcutta, whence I again ascended the Sub-Himalayas to Darjeeling, where the numerous river-bottoms were sprinkled plentifully with many varieties of bamboo, from the larger sizes to dwarfed species covering the mountain slopes, and not longer than the grass of meadows. Again descending to the plains I passed eastward to the Brahmaputra River, which I ascended to the foot-hills in Assam; but finding nothing of superior quality in all this northern region I returned to Calcutta and sailed thence to Rangoon, in Burmah; and there, finding no samples giving more excellent tests in the lower reaches of the Irrawaddy, I ascended that river to Mandalay, where, through Burmese bamboo wiseacres, I gathered in from round about and tested all that the unusually rich Burmese flora could furnish. In Burmah the giant bamboo, as already mentioned, is found indigenous; but beside it no superior varieties were found. Samples tested at several points on the Malay Peninsula showed no new species, except at a point north of Singapore, where I found a species large and heavy which gave a test nearly equal to that of the giant bamboo in Ceylon.
On my return from the mountains, I followed the valleys of the Jumna and the Ganges to Calcutta. From there, I traveled back up to the Sub-Himalayas and reached Darjeeling, where the river valleys were filled with many types of bamboo, ranging from large varieties to tiny ones that covered the mountain slopes and were no taller than the grass in meadows. After descending to the plains, I moved east to the Brahmaputra River, which I navigated up to the foothills in Assam. However, since I found nothing of exceptional quality in this northern region, I went back to Calcutta and then sailed to Rangoon in Burma. There, after finding no samples that showed better results in the lower reaches of the Irrawaddy, I traveled up the river to Mandalay. With the help of local bamboo experts, I gathered and tested everything the incredibly rich Burmese flora had to offer. In Burma, as mentioned before, the giant bamboo is native, but I didn't find any superior varieties beside it. Tests conducted at various points on the Malay Peninsula did not reveal any new species, except for a location north of Singapore where I discovered a large, heavy species that nearly matched the giant bamboo in Ceylon in terms of quality.
"After completing the Malay Peninsula I had planned to visit Java and Borneo; but having found in the Malay Peninsula and in Ceylon a bamboo fibre which averaged a test from one to two hundred per cent. better than that in use at the lamp factory, I decided it was unnecessary to visit these countries or New Guinea, as my 'Eureka' had already been established, and that I would therefore set forth over the return hemisphere, searching China and Japan on the way. The rivers in Southern China brought down to Canton bamboos of many species, where this wondrously utilitarian reed enters very largely into the industrial life of that people, and not merely into the industrial life, but even into the culinary arts, for bamboo sprouts are a universal vegetable in China; but among all the bamboos of China I found none of superexcellence in carbonizing qualities. Japan came next in the succession of countries to be explored, but there the work was much simplified, from the fact that the Tokio Museum contains a complete classified collection of all the different species in the empire, and there samples could be obtained and tested.
"After finishing my time in the Malay Peninsula, I planned to visit Java and Borneo. However, since I discovered a bamboo fiber in the Malay Peninsula and Ceylon that tested one to two hundred percent better than what was being used at the lamp factory, I decided it wasn't necessary to visit those countries or New Guinea. My 'Eureka' moment had already happened, so I decided to head back over the other side of the world, exploring China and Japan along the way. The rivers in Southern China brought various bamboo species down to Canton, where this remarkably useful reed plays a big role in the lives of the people. It’s not just industrial; bamboo shoots are a common vegetable in China. However, among all the bamboos in China, I didn’t find any with exceptional carbonizing qualities. Next on my list was Japan, which made things easier because the Tokyo Museum has a complete classified collection of all the different species in the country, so I could obtain and test samples there."
"Now the last of the important bamboo-producing countries in the globe circuit had been done, and the 'home-lap' was in order; the broad Pacific was spanned in fourteen days; my natal continent in six; and on the 22d of February, on the same day, at the same hour, at the same minute, one year to a second, 'little Maude,' a sweet maid of the school, led me across the line which completed the circuit of the globe, and where I was greeted by the cheers of my boys and girls. I at once reported to Mr. Edison, whose manner of greeting my return was as characteristic of the man as his summary and matter-of-fact manner of my dispatch. His little catechism of curious inquiry was embraced in four small and intensely Anglo-Saxon words—with his usual pleasant smile he extended his hand and said: 'Did you get it?' This was surely a summing of a year's exploration not less laconic than Caesar's review of his Gallic campaign. When I replied that I had, but that he must be the final judge of what I had found, he said that during my absence he had succeeded in making an artificial carbon which was meeting the requirements satisfactorily; so well, indeed, that I believe no practical use was ever made of the bamboo fibres thereafter.
"Now the last of the important bamboo-producing countries in the world had been visited, and it was time to head home; I crossed the broad Pacific in fourteen days, my home continent in six; and on February 22nd, at the same hour and minute, exactly one year later, 'little Maude,' a sweet girl from school, led me across the line that completed my journey around the globe, where my boys and girls welcomed me with cheers. I immediately reported to Mr. Edison, whose way of greeting my return was as typical of him as his straightforward manner of handling my dispatch. His brief and curious inquiry came in four small, distinctly Anglo-Saxon words—while smiling, he extended his hand and asked, 'Did you get it?' This was a concise summary of a year's exploration, just as brief as Caesar's account of his Gallic campaign. When I answered that I had indeed found it, but that he must ultimately judge its value, he replied that during my absence, he had successfully created an artificial carbon that was meeting the requirements well; in fact, I believe that after that, bamboo fibers were never practically used again."
"I have herein given a very brief resume of my search for fibre through the Orient; and during my connection with that mission I was at all times not less astonished at Mr. Edison's quick perception of conditions and his instant decision and his bigness of conceptions, than I had always been with his prodigious industry and his inventive genius.
"I have provided a concise summary of my quest for fiber across the East; and throughout my involvement with that mission, I was continually amazed by Mr. Edison’s sharp understanding of situations, his quick decisions, and his grand ideas, just as I had always been by his incredible work ethic and inventive talent."
"Thinking persons know that blatant men never accomplish much, and Edison's marvellous brevity of speech along with his miraculous achievements should do much to put bores and garrulity out of fashion."
"Smart people understand that loudmouthed individuals don’t achieve much, and Edison's incredible ability to be succinct, along with his amazing accomplishments, should help make boredom and rambling obsolete."
Although Edison had instituted such a costly and exhaustive search throughout the world for the most perfect of natural fibres, he did not necessarily feel committed for all time to the exclusive use of that material for his lamp filaments. While these explorations were in progress, as indeed long before, he had given much thought to the production of some artificial compound that would embrace not only the required homogeneity, but also many other qualifications necessary for the manufacture of an improved type of lamp which had become desirable by reason of the rapid adoption of his lighting system.
Although Edison had launched such an expensive and thorough search around the world for the best natural fibers, he didn’t necessarily feel obligated to use that material exclusively for his lamp filaments forever. While these explorations were taking place, just as he had long before, he was also considering the creation of an artificial compound that would not only have the needed consistency but also many other qualities essential for producing an improved type of lamp that had become necessary due to the quick adoption of his lighting system.
At the very time Mr. McGowan was making his explorations deep in South America, and Mr. Ricalton his swift trip around the world, Edison, after much investigation and experiment, had produced a compound which promised better results than bamboo fibres. After some changes dictated by experience, this artificial filament was adopted in the manufacture of lamps. No radical change was immediately made, however, but the product of the lamp factory was gradually changed over, during the course of a few years, from the use of bamboo to the "squirted" filament, as the new material was called. An artificial compound of one kind or another has indeed been universally adopted for the purpose by all manufacturers; hence the incandescing conductors in all carbon-filament lamps of the present day are made in that way. The fact remains, however, that for nearly nine years all Edison lamps (many millions in the aggregate) were made with bamboo filaments, and many of them for several years after that, until bamboo was finally abandoned in the early nineties, except for use in a few special types which were so made until about the end of 1908. The last few years have witnessed a remarkable advance in the manufacture of incandescent lamps in the substitution of metallic filaments for those of carbon. It will be remembered that many of the earlier experiments were based on the use of strips of platinum; while other rare metals were the subject of casual trial. No real success was attained in that direction, and for many years the carbon-filament lamp reigned supreme. During the last four or five years lamps with filaments made from tantalum and tungsten have been produced and placed on the market with great success, and are now largely used. Their price is still very high, however, as compared with that of the carbon lamp, which has been vastly improved in methods of construction, and whose average price of fifteen cents is only one-tenth of what it was when Edison first brought it out.
At the same time Mr. McGowan was exploring deep in South America and Mr. Ricalton was making his quick trip around the world, Edison, after a lot of research and experimentation, created a compound that promised better results than bamboo fibers. After making some adjustments based on experience, this artificial filament was adopted in lamp manufacturing. However, no major changes were made immediately; instead, the output of the lamp factory was gradually switched over, over a few years, from bamboo to the "squirted" filament, as the new material was known. An artificial compound of some kind has indeed been widely adopted by all manufacturers; thus, the incandescent conductors in all today's carbon-filament lamps are made this way. Nevertheless, it’s important to note that for nearly nine years, all Edison lamps (many millions in total) were made with bamboo filaments, and many continued to be produced this way for several years after that, until bamboo was finally phased out in the early nineties, except for a few special types that used it until about the end of 1908. The last few years have seen remarkable advancements in the production of incandescent lamps, particularly with the replacement of carbon filaments with metallic ones. It’s worth noting that many of the earlier experiments involved using strips of platinum, while other rare metals were occasionally tested. No significant success was achieved in that area, and for many years, the carbon-filament lamp was the dominant choice. In the last four or five years, lamps with filaments made from tantalum and tungsten have been successfully produced and are now widely used. Their prices are still quite high compared to carbon lamps, which have seen significant improvements in construction methods, and whose average price of fifteen cents is only one-tenth of what it was when Edison first introduced it.
With the close of Mr. McGowan's and Mr. Ricalton's expeditions, there ended the historic world-hunt for natural fibres. From start to finish the investigations and searches made by Edison himself, and carried on by others under his direction, are remarkable not only from the fact that they entailed a total expenditure of about $100,000, (disbursed under his supervision by Mr. Upton), but also because of their unique inception and thoroughness they illustrate one of the strongest traits of his character—an invincible determination to leave no stone unturned to acquire that which he believes to be in existence, and which, when found, will answer the purpose that he has in mind.
With the end of Mr. McGowan's and Mr. Ricalton's expeditions, the historic global search for natural fibers also concluded. From beginning to end, the investigations and searches conducted by Edison himself, and continued by others under his guidance, are remarkable not only because they involved a total expenditure of about $100,000 (managed under his supervision by Mr. Upton), but also due to their unique initiation and thoroughness. They showcase one of the strongest traits of his character—an unwavering determination to leave no stone unturned in the pursuit of what he believes exists, and which, when discovered, will fulfill the purpose he has in mind.
CHAPTER XIV
INVENTING A COMPLETE SYSTEM OF LIGHTING
IN Berlin, on December 11, 1908, with notable eclat, the seventieth birthday was celebrated of Emil Rathenau, the founder of the great Allgemein Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. This distinguished German, creator of a splendid industry, then received the congratulations of his fellow-countrymen, headed by Emperor William, who spoke enthusiastically of his services to electro-technics and to Germany. In his interesting acknowledgment, Mr. Rathenau told how he went to Paris in 1881, and at the electrical exhibition there saw the display of Edison's inventions in electric lighting "which have met with as little proper appreciation as his countless innovations in connection with telegraphy, telephony, and the entire electrical industry." He saw the Edison dynamo, and he saw the incandescent lamp, "of which millions have been manufactured since that day without the great master being paid the tribute to his invention." But what impressed the observant, thoroughgoing German was the breadth with which the whole lighting art had been elaborated and perfected, even at that early day. "The Edison system of lighting was as beautifully conceived down to the very details, and as thoroughly worked out as if it had been tested for decades in various towns. Neither sockets, switches, fuses, lamp-holders, nor any of the other accessories necessary to complete the installation were wanting; and the generating of the current, the regulation, the wiring with distributing boxes, house connections, meters, etc., all showed signs of astonishing skill and incomparable genius."
In Berlin, on December 11, 1908, Emil Rathenau’s seventieth birthday was celebrated with great fanfare. He was the founder of the prominent Allgemein Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. This distinguished German, who created a remarkable industry, received congratulations from his fellow countrymen, led by Emperor William, who spoke passionately about his contributions to electrical engineering and Germany. In his engaging response, Mr. Rathenau shared how he traveled to Paris in 1881 and at the electrical exhibition there, he saw Edison's inventions in electric lighting, "which have received as little proper recognition as his numerous innovations in telegraphy, telephony, and the entire electrical industry." He observed the Edison dynamo and the incandescent lamp, "of which millions have been produced since that day without the great master being given the recognition he deserves for his invention." However, what struck the meticulous and thorough German was the extensive development of the entire field of lighting, even at that early stage. "The Edison lighting system was as beautifully designed down to the smallest details, and as thoroughly developed as if it had been tested for decades in various cities. There were no missing components such as sockets, switches, fuses, or lamp-holders that are essential to complete the installation; and the generation of current, regulation, wiring with distribution boxes, house connections, meters, etc., all displayed extraordinary skill and unmatched genius."
Such praise on such an occasion from the man who introduced incandescent electric lighting into Germany is significant as to the continued appreciation abroad of Mr. Edison's work. If there is one thing modern Germany is proud and jealous of, it is her leadership in electrical engineering and investigation. But with characteristic insight, Mr. Rathenau here placed his finger on the great merit that has often been forgotten. Edison was not simply the inventor of a new lamp and a new dynamo. They were invaluable elements, but far from all that was necessary. His was the mighty achievement of conceiving and executing in all its details an art and an industry absolutely new to the world. Within two years this man completed and made that art available in its essential, fundamental facts, which remain unchanged after thirty years of rapid improvement and widening application.
Such praise on this occasion from the man who brought incandescent electric lighting to Germany is significant in terms of the ongoing recognition of Mr. Edison’s work abroad. One thing modern Germany takes pride in and is protective of is its leadership in electrical engineering and research. However, with typical insight, Mr. Rathenau highlighted an important merit that is often overlooked. Edison was not just the inventor of a new lamp and a new generator. While those were crucial components, they were not everything that was needed. His remarkable achievement was the ability to conceive and carry out in all its details an entirely new art and industry. Within two years, this man completed and made that art available with its essential, fundamental principles, which have remained unchanged even after thirty years of rapid advancements and broader applications.
Such a stupendous feat, whose equal is far to seek anywhere in the history of invention, is worth studying, especially as the task will take us over much new ground and over very little of the territory already covered. Notwithstanding the enormous amount of thought and labor expended on the incandescent lamp problem from the autumn of 1878 to the winter of 1879, it must not be supposed for one moment that Edison's whole endeavor and entire inventive skill had been given to the lamp alone, or the dynamo alone. We have sat through the long watches of the night while Edison brooded on the real solution of the swarming problems. We have gazed anxiously at the steady fingers of the deft and cautious Batchelor, as one fragile filament after another refused to stay intact until it could be sealed into its crystal prison and there glow with light that never was before on land or sea. We have calculated armatures and field coils for the new dynamo with Upton, and held the stakes for Jehl and his fellows at their winding bees. We have seen the mineral and vegetable kingdoms rifled and ransacked for substances that would yield the best "filament." We have had the vague consciousness of assisting at a great development whose evidences to-day on every hand attest its magnitude. We have felt the fierce play of volcanic effort, lifting new continents of opportunity from the infertile sea, without any devastation of pre-existing fields of human toil and harvest. But it still remains to elucidate the actual thing done; to reduce it to concrete data, and in reducing, to unfold its colossal dimensions.
Such an amazing achievement, one that’s hard to find in the history of invention, deserves a closer look, especially since this exploration will take us into a lot of new territory with very little overlap from what’s already been discussed. Despite the incredible amount of thought and work put into the incandescent lamp problem between the fall of 1878 and winter of 1879, it shouldn’t be assumed for even a moment that Edison focused entirely on the lamp or the dynamo alone. We’ve spent long nights while Edison wrestled with the real solutions to the many challenges. We’ve watched anxiously as the skilled and careful Batchelor worked, with one delicate filament after another failing to hold together until it could be sealed in its glass housing to shine with a light that had never before existed on land or sea. We’ve worked with Upton on calculating armatures and field coils for the new dynamo, and held the stakes for Jehl and his team during their winding sessions. We’ve seen both the mineral and plant worlds searched for materials that would make the best "filament." We’ve had a sense of being part of a major development, the signs of which today are evident all around us. We’ve felt the intense energy of this effort, creating new opportunities from the barren sea without destroying existing fields of human labor and harvest. Yet, we still need to clarify what was actually achieved; to break it down into concrete details, and in doing so, to reveal its enormous scope.
The lighting system that Edison contemplated in this entirely new departure from antecedent methods included the generation of electrical energy, or current, on a very large scale; its distribution throughout extended areas, and its division and subdivision into small units converted into light at innumerable points in every direction from the source of supply, each unit to be independent of every other and susceptible to immediate control by the user.
The lighting system that Edison envisioned in this completely new approach from previous methods involved generating electrical energy, or current, on a massive scale; distributing it across wide areas, and breaking it down into smaller units that could be converted into light at countless points in every direction from the power source, with each unit being independent of the others and able to be controlled instantly by the user.
This was truly an altogether prodigious undertaking. We need not wonder that Professor Tyndall, in words implying grave doubt as to the possibility of any solution of the various problems, said publicly that he would much rather have the matter in Edison's hands than in his own. There were no precedents, nothing upon which to build or improve. The problems could only be answered by the creation of new devices and methods expressly worked out for their solution. An electric lamp answering certain specific requirements would, indeed, be the key to the situation, but its commercial adaptation required a multifarious variety of apparatus and devices. The word "system" is much abused in invention, and during the early days of electric lighting its use applied to a mere freakish lamp or dynamo was often ludicrous. But, after all, nothing short of a complete system could give real value to the lamp as an invention; nothing short of a system could body forth the new art to the public. Let us therefore set down briefly a few of the leading items needed for perfect illumination by electricity, all of which were part of the Edison programme:
This was truly an enormous task. We shouldn't be surprised that Professor Tyndall, expressing serious doubts about the possibility of solving the various problems, publicly stated that he would prefer to leave the matter in Edison's hands rather than his own. There were no precedents, no foundations to build upon or improve. The challenges could only be addressed by creating new devices and methods specifically designed to solve them. An electric lamp meeting certain specific criteria would indeed be the key to the situation, but adapting it for commercial use required a wide range of equipment and devices. The term "system" is often misused in invention, and during the early days of electric lighting, applying it to a mere quirky lamp or dynamo was sometimes ridiculous. However, nothing less than a complete system could provide real value to the lamp as an invention; nothing short of a system could showcase the new art to the public. So, let's briefly outline a few of the key elements needed for perfect illumination by electricity, all of which were part of Edison's plan:
First—To conceive a broad and fundamentally correct method of distributing the current, satisfactory in a scientific sense and practical commercially in its efficiency and economy. This meant, ready made, a comprehensive plan analogous to illumination by gas, with a network of conductors all connected together, so that in any given city area the lights could be fed with electricity from several directions, thus eliminating any interruption due to the disturbance on any particular section.
First—To develop a comprehensive and fundamentally sound method of distributing electricity that is scientifically valid and commercially efficient and economical. This envisioned a complete plan similar to gas lighting, featuring a network of interconnected conductors, so that in any given urban area, the lights could be powered by electricity from multiple directions, thereby preventing interruptions caused by disruptions in any specific section.
Second—To devise an electric lamp that would give about the same amount of light as a gas jet, which custom had proven to be a suitable and useful unit. This lamp must possess the quality of requiring only a small investment in the copper conductors reaching it. Each lamp must be independent of every other lamp. Each and all the lights must be produced and operated with sufficient economy to compete on a commercial basis with gas. The lamp must be durable, capable of being easily and safely handled by the public, and one that would remain capable of burning at full incandescence and candle-power a great length of time.
Second—To create an electric lamp that would provide about the same amount of light as a gas jet, which tradition has shown to be a practical and effective standard. This lamp should require only a small investment in the copper wiring needed to power it. Each lamp must function independently of the others. All lights need to be produced and operated economically enough to compete commercially with gas. The lamp should be durable, easily and safely handled by the public, and able to maintain full brightness and candle-power for an extended period.
Third—To devise means whereby the amount of electrical energy furnished to each and every customer could be determined, as in the case of gas, and so that this could be done cheaply and reliably by a meter at the customer's premises.
Third—To figure out how to measure the amount of electrical energy provided to each customer, similar to how it's done for gas, and to ensure that this can be done affordably and reliably with a meter at the customer's location.
Fourth—To elaborate a system or network of conductors capable of being placed underground or overhead, which would allow of being tapped at any intervals, so that service wires could be run from the main conductors in the street into each building. Where these mains went below the surface of the thoroughfare, as in large cities, there must be protective conduit or pipe for the copper conductors, and these pipes must allow of being tapped wherever necessary. With these conductors and pipes must also be furnished manholes, junction-boxes, connections, and a host of varied paraphernalia insuring perfect general distribution.
Fourth—To develop a system or network of conductors that can be installed underground or overhead, allowing for access at any intervals, so that service wires can run from the main conductors in the street into each building. Where these mains go below the surface of the road, as in large cities, there must be protective conduits or pipes for the copper conductors, and these pipes must allow for tapping wherever needed. Along with these conductors and pipes, there must also be manholes, junction boxes, connections, and various other equipment to ensure efficient overall distribution.
Fifth—To devise means for maintaining at all points in an extended area of distribution a practically even pressure of current, so that all the lamps, wherever located, near or far away from the central station, should give an equal light at all times, independent of the number that might be turned on; and safeguarding the lamps against rupture by sudden and violent fluctuations of current. There must also be means for thus regulating at the point where the current was generated the quality or pressure of the current throughout the whole lighting area, with devices for indicating what such pressure might actually be at various points in the area.
Fifth—To come up with ways to keep a consistent current pressure throughout a large distribution area, so that all the lights, whether close to or far from the central station, provide equal brightness at all times, no matter how many are turned on; and to protect the lights from breaking due to sudden and extreme changes in current. There should also be a way to control the quality or pressure of the current at the generation point across the entire lighting area, along with tools to show what that pressure actually is at different locations within the area.
Sixth—To design efficient dynamos, such not being in existence at the time, that would convert economically the steam-power of high-speed engines into electrical energy, together with means for connecting and disconnecting them with the exterior consumption circuits; means for regulating, equalizing their loads, and adjusting the number of dynamos to be used according to the fluctuating demands on the central station. Also the arrangement of complete stations with steam and electric apparatus and auxiliary devices for insuring their efficient and continuous operation.
Sixth—To create efficient dynamos, which didn't exist at the time, that would economically convert the steam power of high-speed engines into electrical energy, along with systems to connect and disconnect them from the external consumption circuits; systems to regulate and balance their loads, and adjust the number of dynamos used based on the changing demands at the central station. Also, the setup of complete stations with steam and electric equipment and extra devices to ensure their effective and continuous operation.
Seventh—To invent devices that would prevent the current from becoming excessive upon any conductors, causing fire or other injury; also switches for turning the current on and off; lamp-holders, fixtures, and the like; also means and methods for establishing the interior circuits that were to carry current to chandeliers and fixtures in buildings.
Seventh—To create devices that would prevent the current from becoming too high on any conductors, which could cause fires or other damage; also switches for turning the current on and off; lamp-holders, fixtures, and similar items; as well as ways and methods for setting up the interior circuits that would supply current to chandeliers and fixtures in buildings.
Here was the outline of the programme laid down in the autumn of 1878, and pursued through all its difficulties to definite accomplishment in about eighteen months, some of the steps being made immediately, others being taken as the art evolved. It is not to be imagined for one moment that Edison performed all the experiments with his own hands. The method of working at Menlo Park has already been described in these pages by those who participated. It would not only have been physically impossible for one man to have done all this work himself, in view of the time and labor required, and the endless detail; but most of the apparatus and devices invented or suggested by him as the art took shape required the handiwork of skilled mechanics and artisans of a high order of ability. Toward the end of 1879 the laboratory force thus numbered at least one hundred earnest men. In this respect of collaboration, Edison has always adopted a policy that must in part be taken to explain his many successes. Some inventors of the greatest ability, dealing with ideas and conceptions of importance, have found it impossible to organize or even to tolerate a staff of co-workers, preferring solitary and secret toil, incapable of team work, or jealous of any intrusion that could possibly bar them from a full and complete claim to the result when obtained. Edison always stood shoulder to shoulder with his associates, but no one ever questioned the leadership, nor was it ever in doubt where the inspiration originated. The real truth is that Edison has always been so ceaselessly fertile of ideas himself, he has had more than his whole staff could ever do to try them all out; he has sought co-operation, but no exterior suggestion. As a matter of fact a great many of the "Edison men" have made notable inventions of their own, with which their names are imperishably associated; but while they were with Edison it was with his work that they were and must be busied.
Here’s the outline of the program established in the fall of 1878, which was pursued through all its challenges to achieve a clear outcome in about eighteen months. Some steps were taken right away, while others developed as the art progressed. It’s important to note that Edison didn’t conduct all the experiments himself. The working methods at Menlo Park have already been detailed in these pages by those involved. It would have been physically impossible for one person to handle all this work alone given the time, effort, and intricate details involved. Additionally, most of the equipment and devices he invented or proposed as the field evolved required skilled mechanics and highly capable artisans. By the end of 1879, the laboratory team had grown to at least one hundred dedicated individuals. In terms of collaboration, Edison has always implemented a strategy that partly explains his many achievements. Some of the most talented inventors, who deal with significant ideas and concepts, have struggled to manage or even tolerate a team, preferring solitary and secretive work, unable to collaborate, or resentful of any interference that might hinder their complete claim to the results. Edison, however, always worked alongside his colleagues, and no one ever questioned his leadership or the source of inspiration. The truth is that Edison has been endlessly inventive, and his team has always been busy trying to keep up with his ideas; he sought collaboration but not outside suggestions. In fact, many of the "Edison men" have made their own remarkable inventions, which are forever linked to their names, but while working with Edison, they were focused on his projects.
It was during this period of "inventing a system" that so much systematic and continuous work with good results was done by Edison in the design and perfection of dynamos. The value of his contributions to the art of lighting comprised in this work has never been fully understood or appreciated, having been so greatly overshadowed by his invention of the incandescent lamp, and of a complete system of distribution. It is a fact, however, that the principal improvements he made in dynamo-electric generators were of a radical nature and remain in the art. Thirty years bring about great changes, especially in a field so notably progressive as that of the generation of electricity; but different as are the dynamos of to-day from those of the earlier period, they embody essential principles and elements that Edison then marked out and elaborated as the conditions of success. There was indeed prompt appreciation in some well-informed quarters of what Edison was doing, evidenced by the sensation caused in the summer of 1881, when he designed, built, and shipped to Paris for the first Electrical Exposition ever held, the largest dynamo that had been built up to that time. It was capable of lighting twelve hundred incandescent lamps, and weighed with its engine twenty-seven tons, the armature alone weighing six tons. It was then, and for a long time after, the eighth wonder of the scientific world, and its arrival and installation in Paris were eagerly watched by the most famous physicists and electricians of Europe.
During this time of "creating a system," Edison did a lot of methodical and ongoing work with impressive results in designing and perfecting dynamos. The significance of his contributions to lighting has never been fully recognized, as they have been overshadowed by his invention of the incandescent lamp and a complete distribution system. However, the main improvements he made to dynamo-electric generators were groundbreaking and are still part of the technology today. Thirty years can bring substantial changes, especially in a rapidly advancing field like electricity generation. Although today's dynamos are quite different from those of the past, they incorporate essential principles and elements that Edison originally outlined and refined as key to success. There was indeed prompt recognition from some knowledgeable circles of what Edison was achieving, highlighted by the sensation created in the summer of 1881 when he designed, built, and sent to Paris for the first-ever Electrical Exposition the largest dynamo that had been made at that point. It could light up twelve hundred incandescent lamps and weighed twenty-seven tons with its engine, while the armature alone weighed six tons. At that time, and for a long while afterwards, it was regarded as the eighth wonder of the scientific world, and its arrival and setup in Paris attracted keen attention from the most notable physicists and electricians in Europe.
Edison's amusing description of his experience in shipping the dynamo to Paris when built may appropriately be given here: "I built a very large dynamo with the engine directly connected, which I intended for the Paris Exposition of 1881. It was one or two sizes larger than those I had previously built. I had only a very short period in which to get it ready and put it on a steamer to reach the Exposition in time. After the machine was completed we found the voltage was too low. I had to devise a way of raising the voltage without changing the machine, which I did by adding extra magnets. After this was done, we tested the machine, and the crank-shaft of the engine broke and flew clear across the shop. By working night and day a new crank-shaft was put in, and we only had three days left from that time to get it on board the steamer; and had also to run a test. So we made arrangements with the Tammany leader, and through him with the police, to clear the street—one of the New York crosstown streets—and line it with policemen, as we proposed to make a quick passage, and didn't know how much time it would take. About four hours before the steamer had to get it, the machine was shut down after the test, and a schedule was made out in advance of what each man had to do. Sixty men were put on top of the dynamo to get it ready, and each man had written orders as to what he was to perform. We got it all taken apart and put on trucks and started off. They drove the horses with a fire-bell in front of them to the French pier, the policemen lining the streets. Fifty men were ready to help the stevedores get it on the steamer—and we were one hour ahead of time."
Edison’s funny story about his experience shipping the dynamo to Paris when it was built is worth sharing: "I built a very large dynamo with the engine directly connected, which I intended for the 1881 Paris Exposition. It was one or two sizes larger than those I had built before. I had only a short time to get it ready and on a steamer to make it to the Exposition on time. After finishing the machine, we found the voltage was too low. I had to come up with a way to increase the voltage without changing the machine, which I did by adding extra magnets. After that, we tested the machine, and the crankshaft of the engine broke and flew across the shop. By working around the clock, we installed a new crankshaft, and we had only three days left to get it onboard the steamer and also run a test. So, we coordinated with the Tammany leader, and through him with the police, to clear one of the crosstown streets in New York and line it with officers, as we planned to make a quick trip and weren’t sure how long it would take. About four hours before the steamer was scheduled to leave, we shut down the machine after the test, and created a schedule outlining what each person needed to do. Sixty men worked on top of the dynamo to get it ready, and each had written orders for their tasks. We got everything disassembled and loaded onto trucks and set off. They led the horses with a fire bell in front of them to the French pier, with police lining the streets. Fifty men were ready to assist the stevedores in getting it onto the steamer—and we were an hour ahead of schedule."
This Exposition brings us, indeed, to a dramatic and rather pathetic parting of the ways. The hour had come for the old laboratory force that had done such brilliant and memorable work to disband, never again to assemble under like conditions for like effort, although its members all remained active in the field, and many have ever since been associated prominently with some department of electrical enterprise. The fact was they had done their work so well they must now disperse to show the world what it was, and assist in its industrial exploitation. In reality, they were too few for the demands that reached Edison from all parts of the world for the introduction of his system; and in the emergency the men nearest to him and most trusted were those upon whom he could best depend for such missionary work as was now required. The disciples full of fire and enthusiasm, as well as of knowledge and experience, were soon scattered to the four winds, and the rapidity with which the Edison system was everywhere successfully introduced is testimony to the good judgment with which their leader had originally selected them as his colleagues. No one can say exactly just how this process of disintegration began, but Mr. E. H. Johnson had already been sent to England in the Edison interests, and now the question arose as to what should be done with the French demands and the Paris Electrical Exposition, whose importance as a point of new departure in electrical industry was speedily recognized on both sides of the Atlantic. It is very interesting to note that as the earlier staff broke up, Edison became the centre of another large body, equally devoted, but more particularly concerned with the commercial development of his ideas. Mr. E. G. Acheson mentions in his personal notes on work at the laboratory, that in December of 1880, while on some experimental work, he was called to the new lamp factory started recently at Menlo Park, and there found Edison, Johnson, Batchelor, and Upton in conference, and "Edison informed me that Mr. Batchelor, who was in charge of the construction, development, and operation of the lamp factory, was soon to sail for Europe to prepare for the exhibit to be made at the Electrical Exposition to be held in Paris during the coming summer." These preparations overlap the reinforcement of the staff with some notable additions, chief among them being Mr. Samuel Insull, whose interesting narrative of events fits admirably into the story at this stage, and gives a vivid idea of the intense activity and excitement with which the whole atmosphere around Edison was then surcharged: "I first met Edison on March 1, 1881. I arrived in New York on the City of Chester about five or six in the evening, and went direct to 65 Fifth Avenue. I had come over to act as Edison's private secretary, the position having been obtained for me through the good offices of Mr. E. H. Johnson, whom I had known in London, and who wrote to Mr. U. H. Painter, of Washington, about me in the fall of 1880. Mr. Painter sent the letter on to Mr. Batchelor, who turned it over to Edison. Johnson returned to America late in the fall of 1880, and in January, 1881, cabled to me to come to this country. At the time he cabled for me Edison was still at Menlo Park, but when I arrived in New York the famous offices of the Edison Electric Light Company had been opened at '65' Fifth Avenue, and Edison had moved into New York with the idea of assisting in the exploitation of the Light Company's business.
This exposition leads us to a dramatic and somewhat emotional turning point. The time had come for the old lab team, which had accomplished such remarkable and unforgettable work, to disband, never to regroup under the same conditions for similar efforts again. However, its members remained active in the field, and many have since been prominently involved in various electrical ventures. The reality was that they had performed their tasks so effectively that they now needed to spread out and showcase what they had created, aiding in its industrial application. In truth, they were too few to meet the global demands for Edison's system; in this critical moment, the individuals closest to him and most trusted were those he could rely on for the important outreach work that was needed. The dedicated and enthusiastic team, filled with both knowledge and experience, was soon scattered in all directions, and the speed at which Edison's system was successfully adopted everywhere is evidence of the excellent judgment with which their leader had initially chosen them as colleagues. No one can pinpoint exactly how this disbanding process started, but Mr. E. H. Johnson had already been sent to England to promote Edison's interests, and now the question arose about how to handle the demands from France and the Paris Electrical Exposition, which was quickly recognized as a significant turning point in the electrical industry on both sides of the Atlantic. It's fascinating to note that as the initial team broke apart, Edison became the focal point of another large group, equally committed but more focused on the commercial development of his ideas. Mr. E. G. Acheson notes in his personal records on the lab work that in December 1880, while he was engaged in some experimental work, he was called to the new lamp factory recently established at Menlo Park, where he found Edison, Johnson, Batchelor, and Upton in a meeting. "Edison informed me that Mr. Batchelor, who was overseeing the construction, development, and operation of the lamp factory, was about to set sail for Europe to prepare for the exhibit to be held at the Electrical Exposition in Paris that coming summer." These preparations coincided with adding some notable new team members, the most significant of whom was Mr. Samuel Insull, whose engaging account of events fits perfectly into the story at this point and vividly conveys the intense activity and excitement surrounding Edison at that time: "I first met Edison on March 1, 1881. I arrived in New York on the City of Chester around five or six in the evening and went straight to 65 Fifth Avenue. I had come over to be Edison's private secretary, a position arranged for me through the help of Mr. E. H. Johnson, who I had known in London, and who wrote to Mr. U. H. Painter in Washington about me in the fall of 1880. Mr. Painter forwarded the letter to Mr. Batchelor, who handed it over to Edison. Johnson returned to America late in fall 1880 and in January 1881, he cabled me to come to the United States. At the time he sent the cable, Edison was still at Menlo Park, but when I got to New York, the famous offices of the Edison Electric Light Company had opened at '65' Fifth Avenue, and Edison had moved to New York to help expand the Light Company's business.
"I was taken by Johnson direct from the Inman Steamship pier to 65 Fifth Avenue, and met Edison for the first time. There were three rooms on the ground floor at that time. The front one was used as a kind of reception-room; the room immediately behind it was used as the office of the president of the Edison Electric Light Company, Major S. B. Eaton. The rear room, which was directly back of the front entrance hall, was Edison's office, and there I first saw him. There was very little in the room except a couple of walnut roller-top desks—which were very generally used in American offices at that time. Edison received me with great cordiality. I think he was possibly disappointed at my being so young a man; I had only just turned twenty-one, and had a very boyish appearance. The picture of Edison is as vivid to me now as if the incident occurred yesterday, although it is now more than twenty-nine years since that first meeting. I had been connected with Edison's affairs in England as private secretary to his London agent for about two years; and had been taught by Johnson to look on Edison as the greatest electrical inventor of the day—a view of him, by-the-way, which has been greatly strengthened as the years have rolled by. Owing to this, and to the fact that I felt highly flattered at the appointment as his private secretary, I was naturally prepared to accept him as a hero. With my strict English ideas as to the class of clothes to be worn by a prominent man, there was nothing in Edison's dress to impress me. He wore a rather seedy black diagonal Prince Albert coat and waistcoat, with trousers of a dark material, and a white silk handkerchief around his neck, tied in a careless knot falling over the stiff bosom of a white shirt somewhat the worse for wear. He had a large wide-awake hat of the sombrero pattern then generally used in this country, and a rough, brown overcoat, cut somewhat similarly to his Prince Albert coat. His hair was worn quite long, and hanging carelessly over his fine forehead. His face was at that time, as it is now, clean shaven. He was full in face and figure, although by no means as stout as he has grown in recent years. What struck me above everything else was the wonderful intelligence and magnetism of his expression, and the extreme brightness of his eyes. He was far more modest than in my youthful picture of him. I had expected to find a man of distinction. His appearance, as a whole, was not what you would call 'slovenly,' it is best expressed by the word 'careless.'"
"I was taken by Johnson directly from the Inman Steamship pier to 65 Fifth Avenue and met Edison for the first time. At that time, there were three rooms on the ground floor. The front room served as a sort of reception area; the room right behind it was the office of the president of the Edison Electric Light Company, Major S. B. Eaton. The back room, directly behind the front entrance hall, was Edison's office, where I first saw him. There wasn't much in the room except a couple of walnut roller-top desks, which were commonly found in American offices back then. Edison welcomed me warmly. I think he might have been a bit disappointed that I was so young; I had just turned twenty-one and looked quite boyish. The image of Edison is still vivid in my mind as if our meeting happened just yesterday, even though it has been over twenty-nine years since that first encounter. I had been connected with Edison's work in England as the private secretary to his London agent for about two years, and Johnson had taught me to view Edison as the greatest electrical inventor of the time—a perspective that has only strengthened over the years. Because of this and the fact that I felt very honored to be appointed as his private secretary, I was naturally inclined to see him as a hero. With my strict English ideas about what a prominent person should wear, I wasn't impressed by Edison's clothing. He wore a rather worn black diagonal Prince Albert coat and waistcoat, with dark trousers, and a white silk handkerchief tied loosely around his neck, falling over the slightly tattered white shirt. He had a large wide-brimmed hat, popular at the time, and a rough brown overcoat cut similarly to his Prince Albert coat. His hair was long and hung carelessly over his broad forehead. His face was clean-shaven, which it still is today. He was full-faced and somewhat sturdy, although not as stout as he has become in recent years. What struck me most was the incredible intelligence and magnetism of his expression and the brightness of his eyes. He was much more modest than my youthful image of him had led me to expect. I had anticipated seeing a distinguished man. Overall, his appearance was not what you'd call 'slovenly'; it was best described as 'careless.'"
Mr. Insull supplements this pen-picture by another, bearing upon the hustle and bustle of the moment: "After a short conversation Johnson hurried me off to meet his family, and later in the evening, about eight o'clock, he and I returned to Edison's office; and I found myself launched without further ceremony into Edison's business affairs. Johnson had already explained to me that he was sailing the next morning, March 2d, on the S.S. Arizona, and that Mr. Edison wanted to spend the evening discussing matters in connection with his European affairs. It was assumed, inasmuch as I had just arrived from London, that I would be able to give more or less information on this subject. As Johnson was to sail the next morning at five o'clock, Edison explained that it would be necessary for him to have an understanding of European matters. Edison started out by drawing from his desk a check-book and stating how much money he had in the bank; and he wanted to know what European telephone securities were most salable, as he wished to raise the necessary funds to put on their feet the incandescent lamp factory, the Electric Tube works, and the necessary shops to build dynamos. All through the interview I was tremendously impressed with Edison's wonderful resourcefulness and grasp, and his immediate appreciation of any suggestion of consequence bearing on the subject under discussion.
Mr. Insull adds to this description with another about the flurry of activity at the time: "After a brief chat, Johnson quickly took me to meet his family. Later that evening, around eight o'clock, he and I went back to Edison's office, where I found myself immediately thrown into Edison's business matters without any formal introduction. Johnson had already mentioned that he was leaving the next morning, March 2nd, on the S.S. Arizona, and that Mr. Edison wanted to spend the evening talking about his European business. Since I had just come from London, it was assumed I could provide some information on the topic. With Johnson departing at five o'clock the next morning, Edison explained that he needed to understand European issues. He began by pulling out a checkbook from his desk and revealing his bank balance; he wanted to know which European telephone securities were the easiest to sell, as he needed to raise funds to get the incandescent lamp factory, the Electric Tube works, and the necessary shops for building dynamos up and running. Throughout the conversation, I was incredibly impressed by Edison's amazing resourcefulness and understanding, as well as his quick grasp of any significant suggestions related to the discussion."
"He spoke with very great enthusiasm of the work before him—namely, the development of his electric-lighting system; and his one idea seemed to be to raise all the money he could with the object of pouring it into the manufacturing side of the lighting business. I remember how extraordinarily I was impressed with him on this account, as I had just come from a circle of people in London who not only questioned the possibility of the success of Edison's invention, but often expressed doubt as to whether the work he had done could be called an invention at all. After discussing affairs with Johnson—who was receiving his final instructions from Edison—far into the night, and going down to the steamer to see Johnson aboard, I finished my first night's business with Edison somewhere between four and five in the morning, feeling thoroughly imbued with the idea that I had met one of the great master minds of the world. You must allow for my youthful enthusiasm, but you must also bear in mind Edison's peculiar gift of magnetism, which has enabled him during his career to attach so many men to him. I fell a victim to the spell at the first interview."
"He spoke with a lot of excitement about the work ahead of him—specifically, the development of his electric-lighting system. His main focus seemed to be raising as much money as possible to invest in the manufacturing side of the lighting business. I remember being extraordinarily impressed by him because I had just come from a group of people in London who not only questioned whether Edison's invention could succeed but often doubted whether his work could even be considered an invention at all. After discussing matters with Johnson—who was getting his final instructions from Edison—well into the night and then going down to the steamer to see Johnson off, I wrapped up my first night of business with Edison around four or five in the morning, feeling completely convinced that I had met one of the great minds of our time. You must understand my youthful enthusiasm, but you should also keep in mind Edison's unique magnetic charm, which has allowed him to connect with so many people throughout his career. I fell under his spell during our first meeting."
Events moved rapidly in those days. The next morning, Tuesday, Edison took his new fidus Achates with him to a conference with John Roach, the famous old ship-builder, and at it agreed to take the AEtna Iron works, where Roach had laid the foundations of his fame and fortune. These works were not in use at the time. They were situated on Goerck Street, New York, north of Grand Street, on the east side of the city, and there, very soon after, was established the first Edison dynamo-manufacturing establishment, known for many years as the Edison Machine Works. The same night Insull made his first visit to Menlo Park. Up to that time he had seen very little incandescent lighting, for the simple reason that there was very little to see. Johnson had had a few Edison lamps in London, lit up from primary batteries, as a demonstration; and in the summer of 1880 Swan had had a few series lamps burning in London. In New York a small gas-engine plant was being started at the Edison offices on Fifth Avenue. But out at Menlo Park there was the first actual electric-lighting central station, supplying distributed incandescent lamps and some electric motors by means of underground conductors imbedded in asphaltum and surrounded by a wooden box. Mr. Insull says: "The system employed was naturally the two-wire, as at that time the three-wire had not been thought of. The lamps were partly of the horseshoe filament paper-carbon type, and partly bamboo-filament lamps, and were of an efficiency of 95 to 100 watts per 16 c.p. I can never forget the impression that this first view of the electric-lighting industry produced on me. Menlo Park must always be looked upon as the birthplace of the electric light and power industry. At that time it was the only place where could be seen an electric light and power multiple arc distribution system, the operation of which seemed as successful to my youthful mind as the operation of one of the large metropolitan systems to-day. I well remember about ten o'clock that night going down to the Menlo Park depot and getting the station agent, who was also the telegraph operator, to send some cable messages for me to my London friends, announcing that I had seen Edison's incandescent lighting system in actual operation, and that so far as I could tell it was an accomplished fact. A few weeks afterward I received a letter from one of my London friends, who was a doubting Thomas, upbraiding me for coming so soon under the spell of the 'Yankee inventor.'"
Events moved quickly back then. The next morning, Tuesday, Edison brought his new partner with him to a meeting with John Roach, the well-known shipbuilder. During this meeting, they agreed to take over the AEtna Iron Works, where Roach had built his fame and fortune. These works were not operating at that time. They were located on Goerck Street in New York, north of Grand Street, on the east side of the city, and soon after, the first Edison dynamo-manufacturing facility was established there, known for many years as the Edison Machine Works. That same night, Insull made his first visit to Menlo Park. Until then, he had seen very little incandescent lighting because there wasn't much to see. Johnson had a few Edison lamps in London, powered by primary batteries as a demonstration, and in the summer of 1880, Swan had a few series lamps functioning in London. In New York, a small gas engine plant was being set up at the Edison offices on Fifth Avenue. But at Menlo Park, there was the first real electric-lighting central station, supplying distributed incandescent lamps and some electric motors using underground wires embedded in asphalt and encased in a wooden box. Mr. Insull says: "The system used was naturally the two-wire, as the three-wire system hadn't been considered at that time. The lamps were partly of the horseshoe filament paper-carbon type and partly bamboo-filament lamps, with an efficiency of 95 to 100 watts per 16 candlepower. I'll never forget the impression that first glimpse of the electric-lighting industry had on me. Menlo Park must always be seen as the birthplace of the electric light and power industry. Back then, it was the only place where you could see an electric light and power multiple arc distribution system, which seemed as successful to my youthful mind as one of today's large metropolitan systems. I remember around ten o'clock that night going down to the Menlo Park station and asking the station agent, who was also the telegraph operator, to send some cable messages to my friends in London, announcing that I had seen Edison's incandescent lighting system in actual operation and that, as far as I could tell, it was a done deal. A few weeks later, I received a letter from one of my friends in London, who was skeptical, criticizing me for being so easily charmed by the 'Yankee inventor.'"
It was to confront and deal with just this element of doubt in London and in Europe generally, that the dispatch of Johnson to England and of Batchelor to France was intended. Throughout the Edison staff there was a mingled feeling of pride in the work, resentment at the doubts expressed about it, and keen desire to show how excellent it was. Batchelor left for Paris in July, 1881—on his second trip to Europe that year—and the exhibit was made which brought such an instantaneous recognition of the incalculable value of Edison's lighting inventions, as evidenced by the awards and rewards immediately bestowed upon him. He was made an officer of the Legion of Honor, and Prof. George F. Barker cabled as follows from Paris, announcing the decision of the expert jury which passed upon the exhibits: "Accept my congratulations. You have distanced all competitors and obtained a diploma of honor, the highest award given in the Exposition. No person in any class in which you were an exhibitor received a like reward."
To address this element of doubt in London and across Europe, Johnson was dispatched to England and Batchelor to France. The Edison team felt a mix of pride in their work, frustration over the doubts raised about it, and a strong desire to prove its excellence. Batchelor left for Paris in July 1881—his second trip to Europe that year—and the exhibit was showcased, leading to immediate recognition of the immense value of Edison's lighting inventions, as seen in the awards he quickly received. He was honored as an officer of the Legion of Honor, and Prof. George F. Barker sent a cable from Paris announcing the expert jury's decision on the exhibits: "Accept my congratulations. You have outperformed all competitors and received a diploma of honor, the highest award given at the Exposition. No one in any category where you exhibited received a similar award."
Nor was this all. Eminent men in science who had previously expressed their disbelief in the statements made as to the Edison system were now foremost in generous praise of his notable achievements, and accorded him full credit for its completion. A typical instance was M. Du Moncel, a distinguished electrician, who had written cynically about Edison's work and denied its practicability. He now recanted publicly in this language, which in itself shows the state of the art when Edison came to the front: "All these experiments achieved but moderate success, and when, in 1879, the new Edison incandescent carbon lamp was announced, many of the scientists, and I, particularly, doubted the accuracy of the reports which came from America. This horseshoe of carbonized paper seemed incapable to resist mechanical shocks and to maintain incandescence for any considerable length of time. Nevertheless, Mr. Edison was not discouraged, and despite the active opposition made to his lamp, despite the polemic acerbity of which he was the object, he did not cease to perfect it; and he succeeded in producing the lamps which we now behold exhibited at the Exposition, and are admired by all for their perfect steadiness."
Nor was that all. Respected figures in science who had previously voiced their skepticism about the claims regarding the Edison system were now leading the way in praising his remarkable achievements and giving him full credit for its completion. A prime example was M. Du Moncel, a renowned electrician, who had written sarcastically about Edison’s work and questioned its feasibility. He now publicly changed his stance, saying, "All these experiments had only moderate success, and when, in 1879, the new Edison incandescent carbon lamp was announced, many scientists, including myself, particularly doubted the accuracy of the reports coming out of America. This horseshoe of carbonized paper seemed unable to withstand mechanical shocks and to maintain incandescence for any significant length of time. Nevertheless, Mr. Edison did not lose hope, and despite the strong opposition to his lamp and the harsh criticism directed at him, he continued to improve it; and he succeeded in producing the lamps we now see displayed at the Exposition, which everyone admires for their perfect steadiness."
The competitive lamps exhibited and tested at this time comprised those of Edison, Maxim, Swan, and Lane-Fox. The demonstration of Edison's success stimulated the faith of his French supporters, and rendered easier the completion of plans for the Societe Edison Continental, of Paris, formed to operate the Edison patents on the Continent of Europe. Mr. Batchelor, with Messrs. Acheson and Hipple, and one or two other assistants, at the close of the Exposition transferred their energies to the construction and equipment of machine-shops and lamp factories at Ivry-sur-Seine for the company, and in a very short time the installation of plants began in various countries—France, Italy, Holland, Belgium, etc.
The competitive light bulbs showcased and tested at this time included those from Edison, Maxim, Swan, and Lane-Fox. Edison's success inspired confidence among his French supporters, making it easier to finalize plans for the Societe Edison Continental in Paris, which was formed to manage the Edison patents across Europe. Mr. Batchelor, along with Messrs. Acheson and Hipple, and a couple of other assistants, shifted their focus after the Exposition to building and equipping machine shops and lamp factories in Ivry-sur-Seine for the company, and soon the establishment of plants began in various countries—France, Italy, Holland, Belgium, and so on.
All through 1881 Johnson was very busy, for his part, in England. The first "Jumbo" Edison dynamo had gone to Paris; the second and third went to London, where they were installed in 1881 by Mr. Johnson and his assistant, Mr. W. J. Hammer, in the three-thousand-light central station on Holborn Viaduct, the plant going into operation on January 12, 1882. Outside of Menlo Park this was the first regular station for incandescent lighting in the world, as the Pearl Street station in New York did not go into operation until September of the same year. This historic plant was hurriedly thrown together on Crown land, and would doubtless have been the nucleus of a great system but for the passage of the English electric lighting act of 1882, which at once throttled the industry by its absurd restrictive provisions, and which, though greatly modified, has left England ever since in a condition of serious inferiority as to development in electric light and power. The streets and bridges of Holborn Viaduct were lighted by lamps turned on and off from the station, as well as the famous City Temple of Dr. Joseph Parker, the first church in the world to be lighted by incandescent lamps—indeed, so far as can be ascertained, the first church to be illuminated by electricity in any form. Mr. W. J. Hammer, who supplies some very interesting notes on the installation, says: "I well remember the astonishment of Doctor Parker and his associates when they noted the difference of temperature as compared with gas. I was informed that the people would not go in the gallery in warm weather, owing to the great heat caused by the many gas jets, whereas on the introduction of the incandescent lamp there was no complaint." The telegraph operating-room of the General Post-Office, at St. Martin's-Le Grand and Newgate Street nearby, was supplied with four hundred lamps through the instrumentality of Mr. (Sir) W. H. Preece, who, having been seriously sceptical as to Mr. Edison's results, became one of his most ardent advocates, and did much to facilitate the introduction of the light. This station supplied its customers by a network of feeders and mains of the standard underground two-wire Edison tubing-conductors in sections of iron pipe—such as was used subsequently in New York, Milan, and other cities. It also had a measuring system for the current, employing the Edison electrolytic meter. Arc lamps were operated from its circuits, and one of the first sets of practicable storage batteries was used experimentally at the station. In connection with these batteries Mr. Hammer tells a characteristic anecdote of Edison: "A careless boy passing through the station whistling a tune and swinging carelessly a hammer in his hand, rapped a carboy of sulphuric acid which happened to be on the floor above a 'Jumbo' dynamo. The blow broke the glass carboy, and the acid ran down upon the field magnets of the dynamo, destroying the windings of one of the twelve magnets. This accident happened while I was taking a vacation in Germany, and a prominent scientific man connected with the company cabled Mr. Edison to know whether the machine would work if the coil was cut out. Mr. Edison sent the laconic reply: 'Why doesn't he try it and see?' Mr. E. H. Johnson was kept busy not only with the cares and responsibilities of this pioneer English plant, but by negotiations as to company formations, hearings before Parliamentary committees, and particularly by distinguished visitors, including all the foremost scientific men in England, and a great many well-known members of the peerage. Edison was fortunate in being represented by a man with so much address, intimate knowledge of the subject, and powers of explanation. As one of the leading English papers said at the time, with equal humor and truth: 'There is but one Edison, and Johnson is his prophet.'"
All throughout 1881, Johnson was incredibly busy in England. The first "Jumbo" Edison dynamo had been sent to Paris, while the second and third were sent to London, where they were set up in 1881 by Mr. Johnson and his assistant, Mr. W. J. Hammer, in the three-thousand-light central station on Holborn Viaduct. The plant started operating on January 12, 1882. Aside from Menlo Park, this was the first regular station for incandescent lighting in the world, as the Pearl Street station in New York didn't begin operations until September of the same year. This historic plant was quickly assembled on public land and could have been the foundation of a major system if not for the English electric lighting act of 1882, which severely restricted the industry with its unreasonable regulations and, although significantly modified, has left England with a seriously underdeveloped status in electric light and power. The streets and bridges of Holborn Viaduct were lit by lamps that could be turned on and off from the station, along with the famous City Temple of Dr. Joseph Parker, which was the first church in the world to be illuminated by incandescent lamps—and indeed, the first church to be lit by electricity in any form. Mr. W. J. Hammer, who provided some fascinating insights on the installation, recalls: "I clearly remember Dr. Parker and his associates' astonishment when they noticed the temperature difference compared to gas. I was told that people wouldn't sit in the gallery during warm weather due to the excessive heat from the gas jets, but with the introduction of the incandescent lamp, there were no complaints." The telegraph operating room of the General Post-Office, located at St. Martin's-Le-Grand and Newgate Street nearby, was equipped with four hundred lamps through the efforts of Mr. (Sir) W. H. Preece, who, after being quite skeptical about Mr. Edison's results, became one of his most passionate supporters and helped facilitate the introduction of the light. This station supplied its clients through a network of feeders and mains made from the standard underground two-wire Edison tubing-conductors in iron pipe sections, similar to those later used in New York, Milan, and other cities. It also had a system for measuring the current that used the Edison electrolytic meter. Arc lamps were powered from its circuits, and one of the first practical sets of storage batteries was used for experimentation at the station. In relation to these batteries, Mr. Hammer shares a typical anecdote about Edison: "A careless boy was passing through the station, whistling a tune and swinging a hammer carelessly in his hand. He struck a carboy of sulfuric acid that happened to be on the floor above a 'Jumbo' dynamo. The impact broke the glass carboy, and the acid flowed down onto the field magnets of the dynamo, ruining the windings of one of the twelve magnets. This incident occurred while I was vacationing in Germany, and a well-known scientist associated with the company cabled Mr. Edison to ask if the machine would work if the coil was removed. Mr. Edison replied simply, 'Why doesn’t he try it and see?’ Mr. E. H. Johnson was busy not only handling the demands and responsibilities of this pioneering English plant but also involved in negotiations regarding company formations, attending Parliamentary committee hearings, and hosting distinguished visitors, including leading scientists in England and many notable members of the peerage. Edison was fortunate to be represented by a man with such charm, in-depth knowledge of the subject, and exceptional communication skills. As one of the major English newspapers noted at the time, with equal humor and accuracy: 'There is only one Edison, and Johnson is his prophet.'"
As the plant continued in operation, various details and ideas of improvement emerged, and Mr. Hammer says: "Up to the time of the construction of this plant it had been customary to place a single-pole switch on one wire and a safety fuse on the other; and the practice of putting fuses on both sides of a lighting circuit was first used here. Some of the first, if not the very first, of the insulated fixtures were used in this plant, and many of the fixtures were equipped with ball insulating joints, enabling the chandeliers—or 'electroliers'—to be turned around, as was common with the gas chandeliers. This particular device was invented by Mr. John B. Verity, whose firm built many of the fixtures for the Edison Company, and constructed the notable electroliers shown at the Crystal Palace Exposition of 1882."
As the plant ran, various details and ideas for improvement came up. Mr. Hammer states: "Before this plant was built, it was common to have a single-pole switch on one wire and a safety fuse on the other; the practice of putting fuses on both sides of a lighting circuit started here. Some of the first, if not the absolute first, insulated fixtures were used in this plant, and many of the fixtures had ball insulating joints, allowing the chandeliers—or 'electroliers'—to be rotated, similar to gas chandeliers. This specific device was invented by Mr. John B. Verity, whose company created many of the fixtures for the Edison Company and built the famous electroliers displayed at the Crystal Palace Exposition of 1882."
We have made a swift survey of developments from the time when the system of lighting was ready for use, and when the staff scattered to introduce it. It will be readily understood that Edison did not sit with folded hands or drop into complacent satisfaction the moment he had reached the practical stage of commercial exploitation. He was not willing to say "Let us rest and be thankful," as was one of England's great Liberal leaders after a long period of reform. On the contrary, he was never more active than immediately after the work we have summed up at the beginning of this chapter. While he had been pursuing his investigations of the generator in conjunction with the experiments on the incandescent lamp, he gave much thought to the question of distribution of the current over large areas, revolving in his mind various plans for the accomplishment of this purpose, and keeping his mathematicians very busy working on the various schemes that suggested themselves from time to time. The idea of a complete system had been in his mind in broad outline for a long time, but did not crystallize into commercial form until the incandescent lamp was an accomplished fact. Thus in January, 1880, his first patent application for a "System of Electrical Distribution" was signed. It was filed in the Patent Office a few days later, but was not issued as a patent until August 30, 1887. It covered, fundamentally, multiple arc distribution, how broadly will be understood from the following extracts from the New York Electrical Review of September 10, 1887: "It would appear as if the entire field of multiple distribution were now in the hands of the owners of this patent.... The patent is about as broad as a patent can be, being regardless of specific devices, and laying a powerful grasp on the fundamental idea of multiple distribution from a number of generators throughout a metallic circuit."
We quickly reviewed the developments from when the lighting system was ready to use and when the team spread out to implement it. It's clear that Edison didn’t just sit back or become complacent the moment he achieved the practical stage of commercial use. He wasn’t inclined to say, "Let's rest and be thankful," like one of England's prominent Liberal leaders after a long reform period. On the contrary, he was more active than ever right after the work we summarized at the beginning of this chapter. While he was investigating the generator alongside experiments on the incandescent lamp, he also reflected a lot on how to distribute electricity over large areas, brainstorming various plans to achieve this and keeping his mathematicians busy working on the different ideas that came up. The concept of a complete system had been in his mind in a broad sense for a long time, but it didn’t take shape as a commercial product until the incandescent lamp was fully developed. So, in January 1880, he signed his first patent application for a "System of Electrical Distribution." It was filed in the Patent Office a few days later, but it wasn’t granted as a patent until August 30, 1887. Fundamentally, it covered multiple arc distribution, which will be clearly understood from the following excerpts from the New York Electrical Review of September 10, 1887: "It would appear as if the entire field of multiple distribution were now in the hands of the owners of this patent.... The patent is about as broad as a patent can be, being regardless of specific devices, and laying a powerful grasp on the fundamental idea of multiple distribution from a number of generators throughout a metallic circuit."
Mr. Edison made a number of other applications for patents on electrical distribution during the year 1880. Among these was the one covering the celebrated "Feeder" invention, which has been of very great commercial importance in the art, its object being to obviate the "drop" in pressure, rendering lights dim in those portions of an electric-light system that were remote from the central station. [10]
Mr. Edison filed several other patent applications for electrical distribution in 1880. One of these was for the famous "Feeder" invention, which has been very important commercially, aiming to eliminate the "drop" in pressure that caused lights to dim in areas of an electric lighting system far from the central station. [10]
[Footnote 10: For further explanation of "Feeder" patent, see Appendix.]
[Footnote 10: For more details on the "Feeder" patent, see Appendix.]
From these two patents alone, which were absolutely basic and fundamental in effect, and both of which were, and still are, put into actual use wherever central-station lighting is practiced, the reader will see that Mr. Edison's patient and thorough study, aided by his keen foresight and unerring judgment, had enabled him to grasp in advance with a master hand the chief and underlying principles of a true system—that system which has since been put into practical use all over the world, and whose elements do not need the touch or change of more modern scientific knowledge.
From just these two patents, which were essential and foundational, and which have been, and continue to be, used wherever central-station lighting is implemented, it's clear that Mr. Edison's careful and comprehensive study, along with his sharp insight and reliable judgment, allowed him to understand the key and fundamental principles of a genuine system ahead of time—that system which has since been applied globally and whose components don’t require updates from more recent scientific advancements.
These patents were not by any means all that he applied for in the year 1880, which it will be remembered was the year in which he was perfecting the incandescent electric lamp and methods, to put into the market for competition with gas. It was an extraordinarily busy year for Mr. Edison and his whole force, which from time to time was increased in number. Improvement upon improvement was the order of the day. That which was considered good to-day was superseded by something better and more serviceable to-morrow. Device after device, relating to some part of the entire system, was designed, built, and tried, only to be rejected ruthlessly as being unsuitable; but the pursuit was not abandoned. It was renewed over and over again in innumerable ways until success had been attained.
These patents were far from everything he applied for in 1880, which was the year he was perfecting the incandescent electric lamp and methods to compete with gas. It was an incredibly busy year for Mr. Edison and his entire team, which was occasionally expanded. Constant improvements were the norm. What was considered good today was replaced by something better and more useful tomorrow. Device after device, each relating to some part of the overall system, was designed, built, and tested, only to be ruthlessly discarded as unsuitable; but the effort was never given up. It was repeated over and over again in countless ways until success was finally achieved.
During the year 1880 Edison had made application for sixty patents, of which thirty-two were in relation to incandescent lamps; seven covered inventions relating to distributing systems (including the two above particularized); five had reference to inventions of parts, such as motors, sockets, etc.; six covered inventions relating to dynamo-electric machines; three related to electric railways, and seven to miscellaneous apparatus, such as telegraph relays, magnetic ore separators, magneto signalling apparatus, etc.
In 1880, Edison applied for sixty patents, of which thirty-two were related to incandescent lamps; seven were for inventions concerning distribution systems (including the two mentioned earlier); five pertained to parts like motors, sockets, and so on; six were related to dynamo-electric machines; three dealt with electric railways, and seven were for various devices, such as telegraph relays, magnetic ore separators, magneto signaling equipment, and more.
The list of Mr. Edison's patents (see Appendices) is not only a monument to his life's work, but serves to show what subjects he has worked on from year to year since 1868. The reader will see from an examination of this list that the years 1880, 1881, 1882, and 1883 were the most prolific periods of invention. It is worth while to scrutinize this list closely to appreciate the wide range of his activities. Not that his patents cover his entire range of work by any means, for his note-books reveal a great number of major and minor inventions for which he has not seen fit to take out patents. Moreover, at the period now described Edison was the victim of a dishonest patent solicitor, who deprived him of a number of patents in the following manner:
The list of Mr. Edison's patents (see Appendices) is not just a testament to his life's work but also shows what topics he focused on from year to year since 1868. If you take a close look at this list, you'll notice that the years 1880, 1881, 1882, and 1883 were his most productive times for invention. It's worth examining this list closely to appreciate the wide range of his activities. However, these patents don't cover everything he worked on, as his notebooks reveal many significant and minor inventions he chose not to patent. Additionally, during this time, Edison was taken advantage of by a dishonest patent solicitor, who deprived him of several patents in the following way:
"Around 1881-82 I had several solicitors attending to different classes of work. One of these did me a most serious injury. It was during the time that I was developing my electric-lighting system, and I was working and thinking very hard in order to cover all the numerous parts, in order that it would be complete in every detail. I filed a great many applications for patents at that time, but there were seventy-eight of the inventions I made in that period that were entirely lost to me and my company by reason of the dishonesty of this patent solicitor. Specifications had been drawn, and I had signed and sworn to the application for patents for these seventy-eight inventions, and naturally I supposed they had been filed in the regular way.
Around 1881-82, I had several lawyers handling different types of work. One of them caused me a serious setback. This was when I was developing my electric lighting system, and I was working hard and thinking deeply to cover all the many parts, ensuring that everything was complete in every detail. I filed many patent applications during that time, but I lost seventy-eight of the inventions I created in that period because of this patent lawyer’s dishonesty. Specifications had been drafted, and I had signed and sworn to the patent applications for these seventy-eight inventions, and naturally, I assumed they had been filed properly.
"As time passed I was looking for some action of the Patent Office, as usual, but none came. I thought it very strange, but had no suspicions until I began to see my inventions recorded in the Patent Office Gazette as being patented by others. Of course I ordered an investigation, and found that the patent solicitor had drawn from the company the fees for filing all these applications, but had never filed them. All the papers had disappeared, however, and what he had evidently done was to sell them to others, who had signed new applications and proceeded to take out patents themselves on my inventions. I afterward found that he had been previously mixed up with a somewhat similar crooked job in connection with telephone patents.
As time went on, I was waiting for some updates from the Patent Office, like usual, but nothing came. I thought it was really weird, but I didn't suspect anything until I started seeing my inventions listed in the Patent Office Gazette as patented by other people. Naturally, I requested an investigation and discovered that the patent lawyer had taken the fees from the company for filing all these applications, but never actually submitted them. All the documents had vanished, and it turned out he had sold them to others, who then filed new applications and got patents for my inventions. Later, I found out that he had been involved in a similar shady deal related to telephone patents before this.
"I am free to confess that the loss of these seventy-eight inventions has left a sore spot in me that has never healed. They were important, useful, and valuable, and represented a whole lot of tremendous work and mental effort, and I had had a feeling of pride in having overcome through them a great many serious obstacles, One of these inventions covered the multipolar dynamo. It was an elaborated form of the type covered by my patent No. 219,393 which had a ring armature. I modified and improved on this form and had a number of pole pieces placed all around the ring, with a modified form of armature winding. I built one of these machines and ran it successfully in our early days at the Goerck Street shop.
I can honestly say that losing these seventy-eight inventions has left a deep wound in me that has never healed. They were significant, useful, and valuable, representing a lot of hard work and mental effort, and I felt proud to have overcome numerous serious challenges with them. One of these inventions was the multipolar dynamo. It was an advanced version of the type covered by my patent No. 219,393, which had a ring armature. I modified and improved this design by adding several pole pieces around the ring, along with a new form of armature winding. I built one of these machines and successfully ran it during our early days at the Goerck Street shop.
"It is of no practical use to mention the man's name. I believe he is dead, but he may have left a family. The occurrence is a matter of the old Edison Company's records."
"It doesn't really matter to mention the man's name. I think he’s dead, but he might have left behind a family. This incident is part of the old Edison Company's records."
It will be seen from an examination of the list of patents in the Appendix that Mr. Edison has continued year after year adding to his contributions to the art of electric lighting, and in the last twenty-eight years—1880-1908—has taken out no fewer than three hundred and seventy-five patents in this branch of industry alone. These patents may be roughly tabulated as follows:
It can be observed from looking at the list of patents in the Appendix that Mr. Edison has consistently added to his contributions to electric lighting over the years, and in the last twenty-eight years—1880-1908—he has obtained no fewer than three hundred and seventy-five patents in this field alone. These patents can be roughly categorized as follows:
Incandescent lamps and their manufacture....................149 Distributing systems and their control and regulation....... 77 Dynamo-electric machines and accessories....................106 Minor parts, such as sockets, switches, safety catches, meters, underground conductors and parts, etc............... 43
Incandescent lamps and their manufacture....................149 Distributing systems and their control and regulation....... 77 Dynamo-electric machines and accessories....................106 Minor parts, like sockets, switches, safety catches, meters, underground conductors and parts, etc............... 43
Quite naturally most of these patents cover inventions that are in the nature of improvements or based upon devices which he had already created; but there are a number that relate to inventions absolutely fundamental and original in their nature. Some of these have already been alluded to; but among the others there is one which is worthy of special mention in connection with the present consideration of a complete system. This is patent No. 274,290, applied for November 27, 1882, and is known as the "Three-wire" patent. It is described more fully in the Appendix.
Naturally, most of these patents cover inventions that improve or are based on devices he had already created; however, there are several that are completely original and fundamental. Some of these have already been mentioned, but among the rest, there's one that deserves special attention in relation to our current discussion of a complete system. This is patent No. 274,290, applied for on November 27, 1882, and is known as the "Three-wire" patent. It is described in more detail in the Appendix.
The great importance of the "Feeder" and "Three-wire" inventions will be apparent when it is realized that without them it is a question whether electric light could be sold to compete with low-priced gas, on account of the large investment in conductors that would be necessary. If a large city area were to be lighted from a central station by means of copper conductors running directly therefrom to all parts of the district, it would be necessary to install large conductors, or suffer such a drop of pressure at the ends most remote from the station as to cause the lights there to burn with a noticeable diminution of candle-power. The Feeder invention overcame this trouble, and made it possible to use conductors ONLY ONE-EIGHTH THE SIZE that would otherwise have been necessary to produce the same results.
The significance of the "Feeder" and "Three-wire" inventions becomes clear when you consider that without them, it's questionable whether electric light could compete with low-cost gas, given the huge investment in wires that would be required. If a large city area were to be illuminated from a central station using copper wires running directly to every part of the district, it would require installing large wires or face a significant drop in pressure at the farthest points from the station, causing the lights there to burn noticeably dimmer. The Feeder invention solved this problem, allowing conductors to be only one-eighth the size that would have otherwise been needed to achieve the same results.
A still further economy in cost of conductors was effected by the "Three-wire" invention, by the use of which the already diminished conductors could be still further reduced TO ONE-THIRD of this smaller size, and at the same time allow of the successful operation of the station with far better results than if it were operated exactly as at first conceived. The Feeder and Three-wire systems are at this day used in all parts of the world, not only in central-station work, but in the installation and operation of isolated electric-light plants in large buildings. No sensible or efficient station manager or electric contractor would ever think of an installation made upon any other plan. Thus Mr. Edison's early conceptions of the necessities of a complete system, one of them made even in advance of practice, have stood firm, unimproved, and unchanged during the past twenty-eight years, a period of time which has witnessed more wonderful and rapid progress in electrical science and art than has been known during any similar art or period of time since the world began.
A further cost-saving in conductor materials was achieved with the "Three-wire" invention, which allowed the already reduced conductors to be cut down to just one-third of this smaller size, while also enabling the station to operate far more effectively than it would have if it were run as originally planned. Today, the Feeder and Three-wire systems are used all over the world, not only in central-station operations but also in setting up and running standalone electric-light systems in large buildings. No sensible or efficient station manager or electrical contractor would ever consider an installation based on any other design. Thus, Mr. Edison's early ideas about what a complete system should include, some of which preceded practical application, have remained solid, unchanged, and unimproved for the past twenty-eight years—a time that has seen more remarkable and rapid advancements in electrical science and technology than any other similar period in history.
It must be remembered that the complete system in all its parts is not comprised in the few of Mr. Edison's patents, of which specific mention is here made. In order to comprehend the magnitude and extent of his work and the quality of his genius, it is necessary to examine minutely the list of patents issued for the various elements which go to make up such a system. To attempt any relation in detail of the conception and working-out of each part or element; to enter into any description of the almost innumerable experiments and investigations that were made would entail the writing of several volumes, for Mr. Edison's close-written note-books covering these subjects number nearly two hundred.
It's important to keep in mind that the entire system, with all its components, isn't fully captured in the few patents from Mr. Edison that are specifically mentioned here. To understand the scale of his work and the depth of his genius, we need to carefully review the list of patents granted for the various elements that make up this system. Trying to detail the ideas and processes behind each part or element, or to describe the countless experiments and research efforts involved, would require writing several volumes, as Mr. Edison’s meticulously documented notebooks on these topics number nearly two hundred.
It is believed that enough evidence has been given in this chapter to lead to an appreciation of the assiduous work and practical skill involved in "inventing a system" of lighting that would surpass, and to a great extent, in one single quarter of a century, supersede all the other methods of illumination developed during long centuries. But it will be appropriate before passing on to note that on January 17, 1908, while this biography was being written, Mr. Edison became the fourth recipient of the John Fritz gold medal for achievement in industrial progress. This medal was founded in 1902 by the professional friends and associates of the veteran American ironmaster and metallurgical inventor, in honor of his eightieth birthday. Awards are made by a board of sixteen engineers appointed in equal numbers from the four great national engineering societies—the American Society of Civil Engineers, the American Institute of Mining Engineers, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, whose membership embraces the very pick and flower of professional engineering talent in America. Up to the time of the Edison award, three others had been made. The first was to Lord Kelvin, the Nestor of physics in Europe, for his work in submarine-cable telegraphy and other scientific achievement. The second was to George Westinghouse for the air-brake. The third was to Alexander Graham Bell for the invention and introduction of the telephone. The award to Edison was not only for his inventions in duplex and quadruplex telegraphy, and for the phonograph, but for the development of a commercially practical incandescent lamp, and the development of a complete system of electric lighting, including dynamos, regulating devices, underground system, protective devices, and meters. Great as has been the genius brought to bear on electrical development, there is no other man to whom such a comprehensive tribute could be paid.
It is believed that enough evidence has been provided in this chapter to foster an understanding of the diligent work and practical skill involved in "inventing a system" of lighting that would surpass, and mostly replace, all the other methods of illumination developed over many centuries, all within just a quarter of a century. However, before moving on, it's worth noting that on January 17, 1908, while this biography was being written, Mr. Edison became the fourth recipient of the John Fritz gold medal for achievements in industrial progress. This medal was established in 1902 by the professional colleagues and associates of the veteran American ironmaster and metallurgical inventor, to honor his eightieth birthday. Awards are granted by a board of sixteen engineers appointed in equal numbers from the four major national engineering societies—the American Society of Civil Engineers, the American Institute of Mining Engineers, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the American Institute of Electrical Engineers—whose members represent the best of professional engineering talent in America. Up until the time of the Edison award, three others had been given. The first went to Lord Kelvin, the leading physicist in Europe, for his contributions to submarine-cable telegraphy and other scientific achievements. The second went to George Westinghouse for the air brake. The third went to Alexander Graham Bell for inventing and introducing the telephone. The award to Edison recognized not only his inventions in duplex and quadruplex telegraphy and for the phonograph but also for developing a commercially viable incandescent lamp and for creating a complete system of electric lighting, which included dynamos, regulating devices, an underground system, protective devices, and meters. Despite the significant genius contributed to electrical development, there is no other person to whom such a comprehensive tribute could be given.
CHAPTER XV
INTRODUCTION OF THE EDISON ELECTRIC LIGHT
IN the previous chapter on the invention of a system, the narrative has been carried along for several years of activity up to the verge of the successful and commercial application of Edison's ideas and devices for incandescent electric lighting. The story of any one year in this period, if treated chronologically, would branch off in a great many different directions, some going back to earlier work, others forward to arts not yet within the general survey; and the effect of such treatment would be confusing. In like manner the development of the Edison lighting system followed several concurrent, simultaneous lines of advance; and an effort was therefore made in the last chapter to give a rapid glance over the whole movement, embracing a term of nearly five years, and including in its scope both the Old World and the New. What is necessary to the completeness of the story at this stage is not to recapitulate, but to take up some of the loose ends of threads woven in and follow them through until the clear and comprehensive picture of events can be seen.
In the previous chapter about the invention of a system, the story has progressed over several years of activity leading up to the successful and commercial use of Edison's ideas and devices for incandescent electric lighting. The narrative of any single year during this time, if presented chronologically, would diverge into many different paths—some revisiting earlier work, while others anticipate developments not yet included in the broader overview; and this approach would be confusing. Similarly, the development of the Edison lighting system followed multiple concurrent lines of progress. Therefore, the last chapter aimed to provide a quick overview of the entire movement, spanning almost five years and covering both the Old World and the New. What is needed to complete the story at this point is not a recap, but to focus on some of the loose ends of woven threads and follow them until a clear and comprehensive picture of events emerges.
Some things it would be difficult to reproduce in any picture of the art and the times. One of the greatest delusions of the public in regard to any notable invention is the belief that the world is waiting for it with open arms and an eager welcome. The exact contrary is the truth. There is not a single new art or device the world has ever enjoyed of which it can be said that it was given an immediate and enthusiastic reception. The way of the inventor is hard. He can sometimes raise capital to help him in working out his crude conceptions, but even then it is frequently done at a distressful cost of personal surrender. When the result is achieved the invention makes its appeal on the score of economy of material or of effort; and then "labor" often awaits with crushing and tyrannical spirit to smash the apparatus or forbid its very use. Where both capital and labor are agreed that the object is worthy of encouragement, there is the supreme indifference of the public to overcome, and the stubborn resistance of pre-existing devices to combat. The years of hardship and struggle are thus prolonged, the chagrin of poverty and neglect too frequently embitters the inventor's scanty bread; and one great spirit after another has succumbed to the defeat beyond which lay the procrastinated triumph so dearly earned. Even in America, where the adoption of improvements and innovations is regarded as so prompt and sure, and where the huge tolls of the Patent Office and the courts bear witness to the ceaseless efforts of the inventor, it is impossible to deny the sad truth that unconsciously society discourages invention rather than invites it. Possibly our national optimism as revealed in invention—the seeking a higher good—needs some check. Possibly the leaders would travel too fast and too far on the road to perfection if conservatism did not also play its salutary part in insisting that the procession move forward as a whole.
Some things are hard to capture in any depiction of art and its era. One of the biggest misconceptions people have about any significant invention is the belief that the world is eagerly waiting for it with open arms. The complete opposite is true. There isn't a single new art form or device that has ever been widely embraced upon its introduction. The inventor's journey is challenging. They can sometimes secure funding to help bring their rough ideas to life, but even then, it often comes at a painful personal cost. Once the invention is completed, it usually appeals based on how much material or effort it saves; and then "labor" often stands ready to crush the equipment or ban its use entirely. When both investors and workers agree that the invention is worth supporting, they still have to deal with the public's complete indifference and the stubborn resistance from established devices. Resulting years of hardship and struggle drag on, and the frustration of poverty and neglect often sours the inventor's limited success; many great minds have given in to defeat before achieving the hard-won success that lay just out of reach. Even in America, where adopting new improvements and innovations is seen as quick and certain, and where the substantial fees of the Patent Office and the courts reflect the endless efforts of inventors, it's hard to ignore the unfortunate reality that society unintentionally discourages invention rather than encouraging it. Perhaps our national optimism, reflected in our inventions—aiming for a greater good—needs some moderation. It's possible that leaders would progress too quickly and too far toward perfection if conservatism didn't also play a crucial role in ensuring that advancement happens collectively.
Edison and his electric light were happily more fortunate than other men and inventions, in the relative cordiality of the reception given them. The merit was too obvious to remain unrecognized. Nevertheless, it was through intense hostility and opposition that the young art made its way, pushed forward by Edison's own strong personality and by his unbounded, unwavering faith in the ultimate success of his system. It may seem strange that great effort was required to introduce a light so manifestly convenient, safe, agreeable, and advantageous, but the facts are matter of record; and to-day the recollection of some of the episodes brings a fierce glitter into the eye and keen indignation into the voice of the man who has come so victoriously through it all.
Edison and his electric light were fortunately met with more warmth and acceptance than other inventors and inventions. The value of his work was too clear to be ignored. However, it was through intense pushback and resistance that this new technology made progress, driven by Edison's strong character and his unwavering faith in the eventual success of his system. It might seem odd that such a convenient, safe, and beneficial light needed so much effort to be accepted, but the records speak for themselves; even today, recalling some of those experiences brings a fierce spark to the eyes and a sharp indignation to the voice of the man who has triumphed through it all.
It was not a fact at any time that the public was opposed to the idea of the electric light. On the contrary, the conditions for its acceptance had been ripening fast. Yet the very vogue of the electric arc light made harder the arrival of the incandescent. As a new illuminant for the streets, the arc had become familiar, either as a direct substitute for the low gas lamp along the sidewalk curb, or as a novel form of moonlight, raised in groups at the top of lofty towers often a hundred and fifty feet high. Some of these lights were already in use for large indoor spaces, although the size of the unit, the deadly pressure of the current, and the sputtering sparks from the carbons made them highly objectionable for such purposes. A number of parent arc-lighting companies were in existence, and a great many local companies had been called into being under franchises for commercial business and to execute regular city contracts for street lighting. In this manner a good deal of capital and the energies of many prominent men in politics and business had been rallied distinctively to the support of arc lighting. Under the inventive leadership of such brilliant men as Brush, Thomson, Weston, and Van Depoele—there were scores of others—the industry had made considerable progress and the art had been firmly established. Here lurked, however, very vigorous elements of opposition, for Edison predicted from the start the superiority of the small electric unit of light, and devoted himself exclusively to its perfection and introduction. It can be readily seen that this situation made it all the more difficult for the Edison system to secure the large sums of money needed for its exploitation, and to obtain new franchises or city ordinances as a public utility. Thus in a curious manner the modern art of electric lighting was in a very true sense divided against itself, with intense rivalries and jealousies which were none the less real because they were but temporary and occurred in a field where ultimate union of forces was inevitable. For a long period the arc was dominant and supreme in the lighting branch of the electrical industries, in all respects, whether as to investment, employees, income, and profits, or in respect to the manufacturing side. When the great National Electric Light Association was formed in 1885, its organizers were the captains of arc lighting, and not a single Edison company or licensee could be found in its ranks, or dared to solicit membership. The Edison companies, soon numbering about three hundred, formed their own association—still maintained as a separate and useful body—and the lines were tensely drawn in a way that made it none too easy for the Edison service to advance, or for an impartial man to remain friendly with both sides. But the growing popularity of incandescent lighting, the flexibility and safety of the system, the ease with which other electric devices for heat, power, etc., could be put indiscriminately on the same circuits with the lamps, in due course rendered the old attitude of opposition obviously foolish and untenable. The United States Census Office statistics of 1902 show that the income from incandescent lighting by central stations had by that time become over 52 per cent. of the total, while that from arc lighting was less than 29; and electric-power service due to the ease with which motors could be introduced on incandescent circuits brought in 15 per cent. more. Hence twenty years after the first Edison stations were established the methods they involved could be fairly credited with no less than 67 per cent. of all central-station income in the country, and the proportion has grown since then. It will be readily understood that under these conditions the modern lighting company supplies to its customers both incandescent and arc lighting, frequently from the same dynamo-electric machinery as a source of current; and that the old feud as between the rival systems has died out. In fact, for some years past the presidents of the National Electric Light Association have been chosen almost exclusively from among the managers of the great Edison lighting companies in the leading cities.
It was never true that the public opposed the idea of electric light. In fact, the conditions for its acceptance were quickly coming together. However, the popularity of the electric arc light made it harder for the incandescent light to take off. The arc had become a familiar choice for street lighting, either as a direct replacement for the low gas lamps by the sidewalk or as a new kind of moonlight, grouped atop tall towers often rising a hundred and fifty feet high. Some of these lights were already being used for large indoor spaces, but the size of the units, the dangerous electric current, and the sputtering sparks made them highly undesirable for those settings. A number of parent arc-light companies existed, and many local companies had been formed under franchises to conduct business and fulfill city contracts for street lighting. This effort gathered a significant amount of capital and the energy of many prominent figures in politics and business in support of arc lighting. Under the inventive leadership of brilliant minds like Brush, Thomson, Weston, and Van Depoele—along with many others—the industry made substantial progress and the art became well established. However, strong opposition existed, as Edison predicted from the beginning that the small electric light unit would be superior and focused solely on perfecting and introducing it. This situation made it even more challenging for the Edison system to secure the large sums of money needed for its development and to obtain new franchises or city ordinances as a public utility. Thus, in a curious way, the modern art of electric lighting was divided against itself, characterized by intense rivalries and jealousies that, while temporary, were still significant in a field where eventual unity of forces was unavoidable. For a long time, the arc light reigned supreme in the electrical lighting industry in every aspect, including investment, employees, income, and profits, as well as manufacturing. When the great National Electric Light Association was created in 1885, its founders were the leaders of arc lighting, and not a single Edison company or licensee could be found among its members or dared to seek membership. The Edison companies, soon numbering around three hundred, formed their own association—which continues to exist as a separate and beneficial entity—and the lines were drawn sharply, making it difficult for Edison’s service to advance or for an unbiased person to stay friendly with both sides. However, the increasing popularity of incandescent lighting, combined with the system's flexibility and safety, and the ease with which other electric devices for heat and power could be connected to the same circuits as the lamps, eventually rendered the previous stance of opposition obviously foolish and unsustainable. According to the United States Census Office statistics from 1902, by that time the income from incandescent lighting by central stations accounted for over 52 percent of the total, while arc lighting brought in less than 29 percent; and electric power service, thanks to the ease of introducing motors on incandescent circuits, added another 15 percent. Therefore, twenty years after the first Edison stations were established, the methods they involved could be credited with no less than 67 percent of all central-station income nationwide, and that proportion has continued to grow. It’s easy to see that under these circumstances, modern lighting companies supply both incandescent and arc lighting to their customers, often using the same dynamo-electric machinery to generate the current; and the old rivalry between the two systems has faded away. In fact, for several years now, the presidents of the National Electric Light Association have been almost exclusively selected from the leaders of major Edison lighting companies in the leading cities.
The other strong opposition to the incandescent light came from the gas industry. There also the most bitter feeling was shown. The gas manager did not like the arc light, but it interfered only with his street service, which was not his largest source of income by any means. What did arouse his ire and indignation was to find this new opponent, the little incandescent lamp, pushing boldly into the field of interior lighting, claiming it on a great variety of grounds of superiority, and calmly ignoring the question of price, because it was so much better. Newspaper records and the pages of the technical papers of the day show to what an extent prejudice and passion were stirred up and the astounding degree to which the opposition to the new light was carried.
The other major opposition to incandescent lighting came from the gas industry, where strong feelings were also evident. The gas manager disliked the arc light, but it only affected his street service, which wasn’t his biggest source of income. What really angered him was seeing this new competitor, the small incandescent lamp, confidently entering the residential lighting market, claiming superiority for various reasons and completely ignoring the price issue, since it was so much better. Newspaper reports and the technical publications of the time illustrate how much prejudice and emotion were stirred up and the astonishing extent of the resistance to the new light.
Here again was given a most convincing demonstration of the truth that such an addition to the resources of mankind always carries with it unsuspected benefits even for its enemies. In two distinct directions the gas art was immediately helped by Edison's work. The competition was most salutary in the stimulus it gave to improvements in processes for making, distributing, and using gas, so that while vast economies have been effected at the gas works, the customer has had an infinitely better light for less money. In the second place, the coming of the incandescent light raised the standard of illumination in such a manner that more gas than ever was wanted in order to satisfy the popular demand for brightness and brilliancy both indoors and on the street. The result of the operation of these two forces acting upon it wholly from without, and from a rival it was desired to crush, has been to increase enormously the production and use of gas in the last twenty-five years. It is true that the income of the central stations is now over $300,000,000 a year, and that isolated-plant lighting represents also a large amount of diverted business; but as just shown, it would obviously be unfair to regard all this as a loss from the standpoint of gas. It is in great measure due to new sources of income developed by electricity for itself.
Here again was a clear demonstration of the fact that adding to humanity's resources often brings unexpected benefits, even to its competitors. Edison's work immediately boosted the gas industry in two significant ways. First, the competition encouraged improvements in the processes for producing, distributing, and using gas, leading to substantial cost savings for gas companies and providing customers with a much better light for less money. Second, the introduction of the incandescent light raised the standard of illumination, increasing the demand for gas as people sought brighter and more vibrant lighting, both indoors and outdoors. The combination of these two external forces, coming from a rival they wished to defeat, has significantly increased the production and use of gas over the last twenty-five years. It's true that central stations now generate over $300,000,000 a year, and that off-grid lighting accounts for a considerable amount of redirecting business; however, as previously mentioned, it would be unfair to view all of this purely as a loss for gas. Much of it is actually due to new revenue sources created by electricity itself.
A retrospective survey shows that had the men in control of the American gas-lighting art, in 1880, been sufficiently far-sighted, and had they taken a broader view of the situation, they might easily have remained dominant in the whole field of artificial lighting by securing the ownership of the patents and devices of the new industry. Apparently not a single step of that kind was undertaken, nor probably was there a gas manager who would have agreed with Edison in the opinion written down by him at the time in little note-book No. 184, that gas properties were having conferred on them an enhanced earning capacity. It was doubtless fortunate and providential for the electric-lighting art that in its state of immature development it did not fall into the hands of men who were opposed to its growth, and would not have sought its technical perfection. It was allowed to carve out its own career, and thus escaped the fate that is supposed to have attended other great inventions—of being bought up merely for purposes of suppression. There is a vague popular notion that this happens to the public loss; but the truth is that no discovery of any real value is ever entirely lost. It may be retarded; but that is all. In the case of the gas companies and the incandescent light, many of them to whom it was in the early days as great an irritant as a red flag to a bull, emulated the performance of that animal and spent a great deal of money and energy in bellowing and throwing up dirt in the effort to destroy the hated enemy. This was not long nor universally the spirit shown; and to-day in hundreds of cities the electric and gas properties are united under the one management, which does not find it impossible to push in a friendly and progressive way the use of both illuminants. The most conspicuous example of this identity of interest is given in New York itself.
A retrospective survey shows that if the people in charge of American gas lighting in 1880 had been more visionary and taken a wider perspective, they could have easily maintained dominance in the entire artificial lighting industry by securing ownership of the patents and devices in the new field. Apparently, no such steps were taken, and it’s likely that no gas manager would have agreed with Edison’s viewpoint recorded in his notebook No. 184, that gas properties were gaining improved earning potential. It was probably fortunate and serendipitous for the electric lighting field that, in its early stages, it didn’t end up in the hands of those who opposed its development and wouldn’t have pursued its technical advancement. It was allowed to forge its own path and thus avoided the fate often thought to befall other significant inventions—being bought out just to be suppressed. There’s a vague belief among the public that this results in a loss for everyone; however, the reality is that no valuable discovery is ever completely lost. It may face delays, but that’s all. In the case of the gas companies and the incandescent light, many who saw it as a major irritation, like a red flag to a bull, reacted by expending a lot of money and energy to attack what they considered their adversary. This aggressive attitude didn’t last long or spread widely; today, in hundreds of cities, electric and gas companies are managed together and have found it possible to promote both forms of lighting in a friendly and progressive manner. The most notable example of this shared interest can be seen in New York itself.
So much for the early opposition, of which there was plenty. But it may be questioned whether inertia is not equally to be dreaded with active ill-will. Nothing is more difficult in the world than to get a good many hundreds of thousands or millions of people to do something they have never done before. A very real difficulty in the introduction of his lamp and lighting system by Edison lay in the absolute ignorance of the public at large, not only as to its merits, but as to the very appearance of the light, Some few thousand people had gone out to Menlo Park, and had there seen the lamps in operation at the laboratory or on the hillsides, but they were an insignificant proportion of the inhabitants of the United States. Of course, a great many accounts were written and read, but while genuine interest was aroused it was necessarily apathetic. A newspaper description or a magazine article may be admirably complete in itself, with illustrations, but until some personal experience is had of the thing described it does not convey a perfect mental picture, nor can it always make the desire active and insistent. Generally, people wait to have the new thing brought to them; and hence, as in the case of the Edison light, an educational campaign of a practical nature is a fundamental condition of success.
So much for the early opposition, which was significant. However, one might wonder if inertia should be feared just as much as active hostility. It's incredibly challenging to get hundreds of thousands or even millions of people to do something they've never done before. A major hurdle in Edison’s introduction of his lamp and lighting system was the public’s complete lack of knowledge, not just about its benefits, but even about what the light looked like. Only a few thousand people visited Menlo Park to see the lamps in action at the lab or on the hills, and they were a tiny fraction of the U.S. population. While many articles were written and read, and genuine interest was sparked, it remained largely passive. A newspaper or magazine piece might be well-written and include illustrations, but without personal experience, it fails to create a vivid mental picture or stir up strong desire. Generally, people tend to wait for new things to be brought to them; thus, in the case of Edison’s light, a practical educational campaign is essential for success.
Another serious difficulty confronting Edison and his associates was that nowhere in the world were there to be purchased any of the appliances necessary for the use of the lighting system. Edison had resolved from the very first that the initial central station embodying his various ideas should be installed in New York City, where he could superintend the installation personally, and then watch the operation. Plans to that end were now rapidly maturing; but there would be needed among many other things—every one of them new and novel—dynamos, switchboards, regulators, pressure and current indicators, fixtures in great variety, incandescent lamps, meters, sockets, small switches, underground conductors, junction-boxes, service-boxes, manhole-boxes, connectors, and even specially made wire. Now, not one of these miscellaneous things was in existence; not an outsider was sufficiently informed about such devices to make them on order, except perhaps the special wire. Edison therefore started first of all a lamp factory in one of the buildings at Menlo Park, equipped it with novel machinery and apparatus, and began to instruct men, boys, and girls, as they could be enlisted, in the absolutely new art, putting Mr. Upton in charge.
Another major challenge Edison and his team faced was that there were no places in the world where they could buy any of the equipment needed for the lighting system. From the very beginning, Edison had decided that the first central station featuring his various ideas would be set up in New York City, where he could personally oversee the installation and then monitor its operation. Plans for this were coming together quickly; however, many essential items were needed—each one new and unique—such as dynamos, switchboards, regulators, pressure and current indicators, a wide variety of fixtures, incandescent lamps, meters, sockets, small switches, underground conductors, junction boxes, service boxes, manhole boxes, connectors, and even specially made wire. None of these items existed yet, and there were no outsiders knowledgeable enough to create them on request, except possibly the special wire. So, Edison first started a lamp factory in one of the buildings at Menlo Park, equipped it with innovative machinery and equipment, and began training men, boys, and girls who could be recruited in this completely new field, placing Mr. Upton in charge.
With regard to the conditions attendant upon the manufacture of the lamps, Edison says: "When we first started the electric light we had to have a factory for manufacturing lamps. As the Edison Light Company did not seem disposed to go into manufacturing, we started a small lamp factory at Menlo Park with what money I could raise from my other inventions and royalties, and some assistance. The lamps at that time were costing about $1.25 each to make, so I said to the company: 'If you will give me a contract during the life of the patents, I will make all the lamps required by the company and deliver them for forty cents.' The company jumped at the chance of this offer, and a contract was drawn up. We then bought at a receiver's sale at Harrison, New Jersey, a very large brick factory building which had been used as an oil-cloth works. We got it at a great bargain, and only paid a small sum down, and the balance on mortgage. We moved the lamp works from Menlo Park to Harrison. The first year the lamps cost us about $1.10 each. We sold them for forty cents; but there were only about twenty or thirty thousand of them. The next year they cost us about seventy cents, and we sold them for forty. There were a good many, and we lost more money the second year than the first. The third year I succeeded in getting up machinery and in changing the processes, until it got down so that they cost somewhere around fifty cents. I still sold them for forty cents, and lost more money that year than any other, because the sales were increasing rapidly. The fourth year I got it down to thirty-seven cents, and I made all the money up in one year that I had lost previously. I finally got it down to twenty-two cents, and sold them for forty cents; and they were made by the million. Whereupon the Wall Street people thought it was a very lucrative business, so they concluded they would like to have it, and bought us out.
Regarding the conditions surrounding the production of the lamps, Edison says: "When we first launched the electric light, we needed a factory to produce lamps. Since the Edison Light Company didn’t seem interested in manufacturing, I started a small lamp factory at Menlo Park with the funds I raised from my other inventions and some royalties, along with some help. At that time, it cost about $1.25 to make each lamp, so I proposed to the company: 'If you give me a contract for the duration of the patents, I will make all the lamps you need and deliver them for forty cents each.' The company eagerly agreed, and a contract was drawn up. We then purchased a large brick factory building at a receiver's sale in Harrison, New Jersey, which had previously been an oil-cloth factory. We got it at a significant bargain, paying only a small amount upfront and the rest via mortgage. We relocated the lamp works from Menlo Park to Harrison. In the first year, the lamps cost us about $1.10 each. We sold them for forty cents, but there were only about twenty to thirty thousand of them. The following year, it cost us about seventy cents to make them, and we still sold them for forty cents. We produced quite a few, and lost even more money in the second year than we had in the first. In the third year, I managed to design machinery and tweak the processes, bringing the cost down to around fifty cents. I continued selling them for forty cents and lost more money that year than ever, as sales were rapidly increasing. By the fourth year, I brought the cost down to thirty-seven cents, and recouped all the money I'd lost in a single year. Eventually, I got it down to twenty-two cents, selling them for forty cents, and they were produced by the millions. At that point, the Wall Street investors saw it as a very profitable business and decided they wanted to acquire it, so they bought us out."
"One of the incidents which caused a very great cheapening was that, when we started, one of the important processes had to be done by experts. This was the sealing on of the part carrying the filament into the globe, which was rather a delicate operation in those days, and required several months of training before any one could seal in a fair number of parts in a day. When we got to the point where we employed eighty of these experts they formed a union; and knowing it was impossible to manufacture lamps without them, they became very insolent. One instance was that the son of one of these experts was employed in the office, and when he was told to do anything would not do it, or would give an insolent reply. He was discharged, whereupon the union notified us that unless the boy was taken back the whole body would go out. It got so bad that the manager came to me and said he could not stand it any longer; something had got to be done. They were not only more surly; they were diminishing the output, and it became impossible to manage the works. He got me enthused on the subject, so I started in to see if it were not possible to do that operation by machinery. After feeling around for some days I got a clew how to do it. I then put men on it I could trust, and made the preliminary machinery. That seemed to work pretty well. I then made another machine which did the work nicely. I then made a third machine, and would bring in yard men, ordinary laborers, etc., and when I could get these men to put the parts together as well as the trained experts, in an hour, I considered the machine complete. I then went secretly to work and made thirty of the machines. Up in the top loft of the factory we stored those machines, and at night we put up the benches and got everything all ready. Then we discharged the office-boy. Then the union went out. It has been out ever since.
"One incident that significantly lowered costs was when we began, one of the key processes had to be performed by specialists. This involved sealing the part that held the filament into the bulb, which was quite a delicate task back then and required several months of training before anyone could seal a decent number of parts in a day. Once we reached a point where we employed eighty of these specialists, they formed a union; and knowing that it was impossible to produce lamps without them, they became quite arrogant. One example was when the son of one of these specialists worked in the office and, when asked to do anything, would either refuse or respond disrespectfully. He was fired, after which the union informed us that unless we reinstated the boy, the entire group would strike. The situation became so difficult that the manager approached me, saying he couldn’t tolerate it any longer; something had to change. They were not just being difficult; they were reducing our output, making it impossible to operate the facility. He got me passionate about the issue, so I began looking into whether we could automate that process. After some initial exploration, I figured out how to do it. I then assigned trustworthy workers to develop the preliminary machinery. That machine worked pretty well. I then created another machine that performed the task nicely. Following that, I developed a third machine and started bringing in regular laborers and such. Once I could get these workers to assemble the parts just as well as the trained specialists in an hour, I considered the machine finished. I then secretly set to work and built thirty of these machines. We stored them in the upper loft of the factory, and at night, we set up the workstations and prepared everything. Then we fired the office boy. That’s when the union went on strike. They’ve been on strike ever since."
"When we formed the works at Harrison we divided the interests into one hundred shares or parts at $100 par. One of the boys was hard up after a time, and sold two shares to Bob Cutting. Up to that time we had never paid anything; but we got around to the point where the board declared a dividend every Saturday night. We had never declared a dividend when Cutting bought his shares, and after getting his dividends for three weeks in succession, he called up on the telephone and wanted to know what kind of a concern this was that paid a weekly dividend. The works sold for $1,085,000."
"When we set up the operations at Harrison, we split the interests into one hundred shares, each priced at $100. After a while, one of the guys was short on cash and sold two shares to Bob Cutting. At that point, we hadn’t paid out anything, but eventually, the board decided to declare a dividend every Saturday night. We hadn’t declared any dividends when Cutting bought his shares, but after receiving dividends for three consecutive weeks, he called us up and asked what kind of business it was that paid a weekly dividend. The operations sold for $1,085,000."
Incidentally it may be noted, as illustrative of the problems brought to Edison, that while he had the factory at Harrison an importer in the Chinese trade went to him and wanted a dynamo to be run by hand power. The importer explained that in China human labor was cheaper than steam power. Edison devised a machine to answer the purpose, and put long spokes on it, fitted it up, and shipped it to China. He has not, however, heard of it since.
Incidentally, it's worth mentioning, as an example of the issues brought to Edison, that while he had the factory in Harrison, an importer from the Chinese trade approached him wanting a dynamo powered by hand. The importer explained that in China, human labor was cheaper than steam power. Edison designed a machine to meet this need, equipped it with long spokes, and shipped it to China. However, he hasn’t heard anything about it since.
For making the dynamos Edison secured, as noted in the preceding chapter, the Roach Iron Works on Goerck Street, New York, and this was also equipped. A building was rented on Washington Street, where machinery and tools were put in specially designed for making the underground tube conductors and their various paraphernalia; and the faithful John Kruesi was given charge of that branch of production. To Sigmund Bergmann, who had worked previously with Edison on telephone apparatus and phonographs, and was already making Edison specialties in a small way in a loft on Wooster Street, New York, was assigned the task of constructing sockets, fixtures, meters, safety fuses, and numerous other details.
To manufacture the dynamos, Edison secured, as mentioned in the previous chapter, the Roach Iron Works on Goerck Street, New York, which was also set up for this purpose. A building was leased on Washington Street, where specialized machinery and tools were installed for making underground tube conductors and their various components; the reliable John Kruesi was put in charge of that production branch. Sigmund Bergmann, who had previously worked with Edison on telephone equipment and phonographs, and was already making Edison products on a small scale in a loft on Wooster Street, New York, was tasked with constructing sockets, fixtures, meters, safety fuses, and many other details.
Thus, broadly, the manufacturing end of the problem of introduction was cared for. In the early part of 1881 the Edison Electric Light Company leased the old Bishop mansion at 65 Fifth Avenue, close to Fourteenth Street, for its headquarters and show-rooms. This was one of the finest homes in the city of that period, and its acquisition was a premonitory sign of the surrender of the famous residential avenue to commerce. The company needed not only offices, but, even more, such an interior as would display to advantage the new light in everyday use; and this house with its liberal lines, spacious halls, lofty ceilings, wide parlors, and graceful, winding stairway was ideal for the purpose. In fact, in undergoing this violent change, it did not cease to be a home in the real sense, for to this day many an Edison veteran's pulse is quickened by some chance reference to "65," where through many years the work of development by a loyal and devoted band of workers was centred. Here Edison and a few of his assistants from Menlo Park installed immediately in the basement a small generating plant, at first with a gas-engine which was not successful, and then with a Hampson high-speed engine and boiler, constituting a complete isolated plant. The building was wired from top to bottom, and equipped with all the appliances of the art. The experience with the little gas-engine was rather startling. "At an early period at '65' we decided," says Edison, "to light it up with the Edison system, and put a gas-engine in the cellar, using city gas. One day it was not going very well, and I went down to the man in charge and got exploring around. Finally I opened the pedestal—a storehouse for tools, etc. We had an open lamp, and when we opened the pedestal, it blew the doors off, and blew out the windows, and knocked me down, and the other man."
So, overall, the manufacturing aspect of the introduction issue was handled. In early 1881, the Edison Electric Light Company rented the old Bishop mansion at 65 Fifth Avenue, near Fourteenth Street, for its headquarters and showrooms. This was one of the finest houses in the city at that time, and acquiring it signaled the shift of that famous residential avenue towards commerce. The company needed not just offices, but also a space that would effectively showcase the new light in everyday use; this house, with its generous layout, spacious halls, high ceilings, wide parlors, and elegant, winding staircase, was perfect for that purpose. In fact, even though it underwent this drastic change, it still felt like a home in the truest sense, as even today many former Edison employees feel a thrill at the mention of "65," where a loyal and dedicated group of workers focused their efforts for many years. Here, Edison and a few of his assistants from Menlo Park quickly set up a small generating plant in the basement, first using a gas engine that didn't work well, and then switching to a Hampson high-speed engine and boiler, creating a complete isolated plant. The building was wired from top to bottom and fitted with all the latest equipment of the time. The experience with the small gas engine was quite shocking. "Early on at '65,' we decided," Edison recalls, "to light it up with the Edison system and put a gas engine in the cellar, using city gas. One day it wasn't running well, so I went down to check on the guy in charge and started looking around. Finally, I opened the pedestal—a storage area for tools, etc. We had an open lamp, and when we opened the pedestal, it blew the doors off, shattered the windows, and knocked me and the other guy down."
For the next four or five years "65" was a veritable beehive, day and night. The routine was very much the same as that at the laboratory, in its utter neglect of the clock. The evenings were not only devoted to the continuance of regular business, but the house was thrown open to the public until late at night, never closing before ten o'clock, so as to give everybody who wished an opportunity to see that great novelty of the time—the incandescent light—whose fame had meanwhile been spreading all over the globe. The first year, 1881, was naturally that which witnessed the greatest rush of visitors; and the building hardly ever closed its doors till midnight. During the day business was carried on under great stress, and Mr. Insull has described how Edison was to be found there trying to lead the life of a man of affairs in the conventional garb of polite society, instead of pursuing inventions and researches in his laboratory. But the disagreeable ordeal could not be dodged. After the experience Edison could never again be tempted to quit his laboratory and work for any length of time; but in this instance there were some advantages attached to the sacrifice, for the crowds of lion-hunters and people seeking business arrangements would only have gone out to Menlo Park; while, on the other hand, the great plans for lighting New York demanded very close personal attention on the spot.
For the next four or five years, "65" was a real hub of activity, day and night. The routine was very similar to that at the lab, completely ignoring the clock. Evenings were dedicated not only to regular business but the house was also open to the public until late at night, never closing before ten o'clock, so everyone who wanted to could see the incredible new thing of the time—the incandescent light—which was becoming famous worldwide. The first year, 1881, naturally had the highest influx of visitors, and the building hardly ever closed its doors before midnight. During the day, business was conducted under a lot of pressure, and Mr. Insull described how Edison would be found there trying to act like a businessman in the formal attire of polite society, instead of focusing on inventions and research in his lab. But this challenging experience couldn’t be avoided. After this, Edison could never again be convinced to stay away from his laboratory for long; however, there were some benefits to the sacrifice, as the throngs of curious people and potential business partners would have only gone to Menlo Park; on the other hand, the major plans for lighting New York required his close personal attention right there.
As it was, not only Edison, but all the company's directors, officers, and employees, were kept busy exhibiting and explaining the light. To the public of that day, when the highest known form of house illuminant was gas, the incandescent lamp, with its ability to burn in any position, its lack of heat so that you could put your hand on the brilliant glass globe; the absence of any vitiating effect on the atmosphere, the obvious safety from fire; the curious fact that you needed no matches to light it, and that it was under absolute control from a distance—these and many other features came as a distinct revelation and marvel, while promising so much additional comfort, convenience, and beauty in the home, that inspection was almost invariably followed by a request for installation.
As it was, not just Edison, but all the company's directors, officers, and employees were busy showing and explaining the light. For the public of that time, when gas was the most advanced form of home lighting available, the incandescent lamp—with its ability to shine in any position, its lack of heat so you could touch the brilliant glass globe, its absence of any harmful effects on the air, its clear safety from fire, the fact that it didn't require matches to light it, and that it could be controlled from a distance—these and many other features were a complete revelation and marvel, promising so much more comfort, convenience, and beauty in the home, that a visit would almost always lead to a request for installation.
The camaraderie that existed at this time was very democratic, for all were workers in a common cause; all were enthusiastic believers in the doctrine they proclaimed, and hoped to profit by the opening up of the new art. Often at night, in the small hours, all would adjourn for refreshments to a famous resort nearby, to discuss the events of to-day and to-morrow, full of incident and excitement. The easy relationship of the time is neatly sketched by Edison in a humorous complaint as to his inability to keep his own cigars: "When at '65' I used to have in my desk a box of cigars. I would go to the box four or five times to get a cigar, but after it got circulated about the building, everybody would come to get my cigars, so that the box would only last about a day and a half. I was telling a gentleman one day that I could not keep a cigar. Even if I locked them up in my desk they would break it open. He suggested to me that he had a friend over on Eighth Avenue who made a superior grade of cigars, and who would show them a trick. He said he would have some of them made up with hair and old paper, and I could put them in without a word and see the result. I thought no more about the matter. He came in two or three months after, and said: 'How did that cigar business work?' I didn't remember anything about it. On coming to investigate, it appeared that the box of cigars had been delivered and had been put in my desk, and I had smoked them all! I was too busy on other things to notice."
The camaraderie at this time was very democratic, as everyone was working towards a common goal; all were passionate believers in the ideas they shared and were eager to benefit from the emergence of the new art. Often at night, in the early hours, everyone would head out for drinks to a popular spot nearby, to talk about the events of today and tomorrow, full of action and excitement. Edison's humorous complaint captures the easygoing nature of the time when he remarked on his trouble keeping his own cigars: "When I was at '65', I used to have a box of cigars in my desk. I'd go to the box four or five times to grab a cigar, but once word got out about it, everyone would come for my cigars, so the box would only last about a day and a half. One day, I was telling a gentleman that I couldn't keep a cigar. Even if I locked them in my desk, they'd break in. He suggested that he had a friend on Eighth Avenue who made a superior grade of cigars and could show me a trick. He said he'd have some made with hair and old paper, and I could slip them in without saying anything and see what happened. I didn’t think much of it. A couple of months later, he came in and asked, 'How did that cigar thing work out?' I didn’t remember anything about it. Upon checking, it turned out that the box of cigars had been delivered and placed in my desk, and I had smoked them all! I was too busy with other things to notice."
It was no uncommon sight to see in the parlors in the evening John Pierpont Morgan, Norvin Green, Grosvenor P. Lowrey, Henry Villard, Robert L. Cutting, Edward D. Adams, J. Hood Wright, E. G. Fabbri, R. M. Galloway, and other men prominent in city life, many of them stock-holders and directors; all interested in doing this educational work. Thousands of persons thus came—bankers, brokers, lawyers, editors, and reporters, prominent business men, electricians, insurance experts, under whose searching and intelligent inquiries the facts were elicited, and general admiration was soon won for the system, which in advance had solved so many new problems. Edison himself was in universal request and the subject of much adulation, but altogether too busy and modest to be spoiled by it. Once in a while he felt it his duty to go over the ground with scientific visitors, many of whom were from abroad, and discuss questions which were not simply those of technique, but related to newer phenomena, such as the action of carbon, the nature and effects of high vacua; the principles of electrical subdivision; the value of insulation, and many others which, unfortunate to say, remain as esoteric now as they were then, ever fruitful themes of controversy.
It was common to see in the parlors in the evening John Pierpont Morgan, Norvin Green, Grosvenor P. Lowrey, Henry Villard, Robert L. Cutting, Edward D. Adams, J. Hood Wright, E. G. Fabbri, R. M. Galloway, and other prominent figures in city life, many of them shareholders and directors; all interested in this educational work. Thousands of people came—bankers, brokers, lawyers, editors, reporters, and leading business professionals, electricians, insurance experts—who, through their insightful inquiries, revealed important facts, and soon won widespread admiration for a system that had already solved many new problems. Edison was in high demand and received a lot of praise, but he was far too busy and humble to let it get to his head. Occasionally, he felt it was his responsibility to meet with scientific visitors, many from abroad, and discuss topics that went beyond just technical details, including newer phenomena like the behavior of carbon, the nature and effects of high vacuums; the principles of electrical subdivision; the importance of insulation, and many others that, unfortunately, are still as obscure today as they were back then, persistently sparking controversy.
Speaking of those days or nights, Edison says: "Years ago one of the great violinists was Remenyi. After his performances were over he used to come down to '65' and talk economics, philosophy, moral science, and everything else. He was highly educated and had great mental capacity. He would talk with me, but I never asked him to bring his violin. One night he came with his violin, about twelve o'clock. I had a library at the top of the house, and Remenyi came up there. He was in a genial humor, and played the violin for me for about two hours—$2000 worth. The front doors were closed, and he walked up and down the room as he played. After that, every time he came to New York he used to call at '65' late at night with his violin. If we were not there, he could come down to the slums at Goerck Street, and would play for an hour or two and talk philosophy. I would talk for the benefit of his music. Henry E. Dixey, then at the height of his 'Adonis' popularity, would come in in those days, after theatre hours, and would entertain us with stories—1882-84. Another visitor who used to give us a good deal of amusement and pleasure was Captain Shaw, the head of the London Fire Brigade. He was good company. He would go out among the fire-laddies and have a great time. One time Robert Lincoln and Anson Stager, of the Western Union, interested in the electric light, came on to make some arrangement with Major Eaton, President of the Edison Electric Light Company. They came to '65' in the afternoon, and Lincoln commenced telling stories—like his father. They told stories all the afternoon, and that night they left for Chicago. When they got to Cleveland, it dawned upon them that they had not done any business, so they had to come back on the next train to New York to transact it. They were interested in the Chicago Edison Company, now one of the largest of the systems in the world. Speaking of telling stories, I once got telling a man stories at the Harrison lamp factory, in the yard, as he was leaving. It was winter, and he was all in furs. I had nothing on to protect me against the cold. I told him one story after the other—six of them. Then I got pleurisy, and had to be shipped to Florida for cure."
Speaking of those days or nights, Edison says: "Years ago, one of the great violinists was Remenyi. After his performances, he would come down to '65' and discuss economics, philosophy, moral science, and everything else. He was highly educated and had great mental capacity. He would chat with me, but I never asked him to bring his violin. One night, he showed up with his violin around twelve o'clock. I had a library at the top of the house, and Remenyi came up there. He was in a good mood and played the violin for me for about two hours—$2000 worth. The front doors were closed, and he walked back and forth in the room as he played. After that, every time he came to New York, he would drop by '65' late at night with his violin. If we weren't there, he could head down to the slums on Goerck Street and play for an hour or two while discussing philosophy. I would talk to enhance his music. Henry E. Dixey, who was at the height of his 'Adonis' fame, would come in during those days after theater hours and entertain us with stories—1882-84. Another visitor who brought us a lot of joy and laughter was Captain Shaw, the head of the London Fire Brigade. He was great company and would mingle with the firemen, having a fantastic time. One time, Robert Lincoln and Anson Stager from Western Union, who were interested in the electric light, came to arrange something with Major Eaton, President of the Edison Electric Light Company. They arrived at '65' in the afternoon, and Lincoln began telling stories—just like his father. They shared stories all afternoon, and that night they left for Chicago. When they reached Cleveland, they suddenly realized they hadn’t done any business, so they had to catch the next train back to New York to get it done. They were interested in the Chicago Edison Company, which is now one of the largest electric systems in the world. Speaking of sharing stories, I once began telling a guy stories at the Harrison lamp factory, in the yard, as he was leaving. It was winter, and he was all bundled up in furs. I had nothing on to keep me warm. I told him one story after another—six in total. Then I came down with pleurisy and had to be sent to Florida for treatment."
The organization of the Edison Electric Light Company went back to 1878; but up to the time of leasing 65 Fifth Avenue it had not been engaged in actual business. It had merely enjoyed the delights of anxious anticipation, and the perilous pleasure of backing Edison's experiments. Now active exploitation was required. Dr. Norvin Green, the well-known President of the Western Union Telegraph Company, was president also of the Edison Company, but the pressing nature of his regular duties left him no leisure for such close responsible management as was now required. Early in 1881 Mr. Grosvenor P. Lowrey, after consultation with Mr. Edison, prevailed upon Major S. B. Eaton, the leading member of a very prominent law firm in New York, to accept the position of vice-president and general manager of the company, in which, as also in some of the subsidiary Edison companies, and as president, he continued actively and energetically for nearly four years, a critical, formative period in which the solidity of the foundation laid is attested by the magnitude and splendor of the superstructure.
The Edison Electric Light Company was founded in 1878, but until it leased 65 Fifth Avenue, it hadn't actually started operating. It had only enjoyed the excitement of anticipation and the risky thrill of supporting Edison's experiments. Now, active management was necessary. Dr. Norvin Green, the well-known president of the Western Union Telegraph Company, was also the president of the Edison Company, but the demands of his regular job left him no time for the close, responsible management that was now needed. Early in 1881, Mr. Grosvenor P. Lowrey, after talking with Mr. Edison, convinced Major S. B. Eaton, a leading member of a prominent New York law firm, to take on the role of vice-president and general manager of the company. He remained actively involved in this position, as well as in some of the subsidiary Edison companies, for nearly four years—a critical and formative time that laid a solid foundation, as shown by the scale and magnificence of the resulting structure.
The fact that Edison conferred at this point with Mr. Lowrey should, perhaps, be explained in justice to the distinguished lawyer, who for so many years was the close friend of the inventor, and the chief counsel in all the tremendous litigation that followed the effort to enforce and validate the Edison patents. As in England Mr. Edison was fortunate in securing the legal assistance of Sir Richard Webster, afterward Lord Chief Justice of England, so in America it counted greatly in his favor to enjoy the advocacy of such a man as Lowrey, prominent among the famous leaders of the New York bar. Born in Massachusetts, Mr. Lowrey, in his earlier days of straitened circumstances, was accustomed to defray some portion of his educational expenses by teaching music in the Berkshire villages, and by a curious coincidence one of his pupils was F. L. Pope, later Edison's partner for a time. Lowrey went West to "Bleeding Kansas" with the first Governor, Reeder, and both were active participants in the exciting scenes of the "Free State" war until driven away in 1856, like many other free-soilers, by the acts of the "Border Ruffian" legislature. Returning East, Mr. Lowrey took up practice in New York, soon becoming eminent in his profession, and upon the accession of William Orton to the presidency of the Western Union Telegraph Company in 1866, he was appointed its general counsel, the duties of which post he discharged for fifteen years. One of the great cases in which he thus took a leading and distinguished part was that of the quadruplex telegraph; and later he acted as legal adviser to Henry Villard in his numerous grandiose enterprises. Lowrey thus came to know Edison, to conceive an intense admiration for him, and to believe in his ability at a time when others could not detect the fire of genius smouldering beneath the modest exterior of a gaunt young operator slowly "finding himself." It will be seen that Mr Lowrey was in a peculiarly advantageous position to make his convictions about Edison felt, so that it was he and his friends who rallied quickly to the new banner of discovery, and lent to the inventor the aid that came at a critical period. In this connection it may be well to quote an article that appeared at the time of Mr. Lowrey's death, in 1893: "One of the most important services which Mr. Lowrey has ever performed was in furnishing and procuring the necessary financial backing for Thomas A. Edison in bringing out and perfecting his system of incandescent lighting. With characteristic pertinacity, Mr. Lowrey stood by the inventor through thick and thin, in spite of doubt, discouragement, and ridicule, until at last success crowned his efforts. In all the litigation which has resulted from the wide-spread infringements of the Edison patents, Mr. Lowrey has ever borne the burden and heat of the day, and perhaps in no other field has he so personally distinguished himself as in the successful advocacy of the claims of Edison to the invention of the incandescent lamp and everything 'hereunto pertaining.'"
The fact that Edison talked at this point with Mr. Lowrey should be clarified in fairness to the distinguished lawyer, who was a close friend of the inventor for many years and the main legal advisor in all the extensive lawsuits that followed the efforts to enforce and validate Edison’s patents. Just as Edison was fortunate to secure the legal expertise of Sir Richard Webster in England, it was equally advantageous for him to have someone like Lowrey on his side, who was prominent among the top leaders of the New York bar. Born in Massachusetts, Mr. Lowrey, during his early days of financial struggle, covered part of his education costs by teaching music in the Berkshire villages. By a curious coincidence, one of his students was F. L. Pope, who later became Edison's partner for a time. Lowrey went to "Bleeding Kansas" with the first Governor, Reeder, and both actively participated in the thrilling events of the "Free State" war until they were driven away in 1856, like many other free-soilers, by the actions of the "Border Ruffian" legislature. After returning East, Mr. Lowrey started practicing law in New York, quickly becoming well-known in his field. When William Orton became president of the Western Union Telegraph Company in 1866, Lowrey was appointed its general counsel, a position he held for fifteen years. One of the major cases in which he played a key role was the quadruplex telegraph; later, he served as a legal advisor to Henry Villard in many grand projects. Through this, Lowrey became acquainted with Edison, developed a strong admiration for him, and believed in his potential at a time when others couldn’t see the flicker of genius hidden beneath the unassuming exterior of a thin young operator slowly "finding himself." It’s clear that Mr. Lowrey was in a uniquely favorable position to express his beliefs about Edison, and it was he and his friends who quickly rallied to the new banner of discovery, providing the inventor with crucial support during a critical time. In this regard, it’s fitting to quote an article that appeared at the time of Mr. Lowrey's death in 1893: "One of the most significant services Mr. Lowrey ever provided was securing the necessary financial support for Thomas A. Edison to develop and perfect his incandescent lighting system. With characteristic determination, Mr. Lowrey stood by the inventor through thick and thin, despite doubt, discouragement, and ridicule, until eventually, their efforts were rewarded with success. Throughout the lawsuits stemming from widespread infringements of the Edison patents, Mr. Lowrey carried the burden of the challenge, and perhaps in no other area did he personally excel as he did in successfully advocating for Edison’s claims to the invention of the incandescent lamp and everything related to it."
This was the man of whom Edison had necessarily to make a confidant and adviser, and who supplied other things besides the legal direction and financial alliance, by his knowledge of the world and of affairs. There were many vital things to be done in the exploitation of the system that Edison simply could not and would not do; but in Lowrey's savoir faire, ready wit and humor, chivalry of devotion, graceful eloquence, and admirable equipoise of judgment were all the qualities that the occasion demanded and that met the exigencies.
This was the man whom Edison had to rely on as a confidant and advisor, providing not just legal guidance and financial support, but also his understanding of the world and business. There were many crucial tasks in developing the system that Edison simply couldn't or wouldn't handle; however, Lowrey's know-how, quick wit and humor, devoted chivalry, smooth eloquence, and balanced judgment had all the qualities needed for the situation and met the demands of the moment.
We are indebted to Mr. Insull for a graphic sketch of Edison at this period, and of the conditions under which work was done and progress was made: "I do not think I had any understanding with Edison when I first went with him as to my duties. I did whatever he told me, and looked after all kinds of affairs, from buying his clothes to financing his business. I used to open the correspondence and answer it all, sometimes signing Edison's name with my initial, and sometimes signing my own name. If the latter course was pursued, and I was addressing a stranger, I would sign as Edison's private secretary. I held his power of attorney, and signed his checks. It was seldom that Edison signed a letter or check at this time. If he wanted personally to send a communication to anybody, if it was one of his close associates, it would probably be a pencil memorandum signed 'Edison.' I was a shorthand writer, but seldom took down from Edison's dictation, unless it was on some technical subject that I did not understand. I would go over the correspondence with Edison, sometimes making a marginal note in shorthand, and sometimes Edison would make his own notes on letters, and I would be expected to clean up the correspondence with Edison's laconic comments as a guide as to the character of answer to make. It was a very common thing for Edison to write the words 'Yes' or 'No,' and this would be all I had on which to base my answer. Edison marginalized documents extensively. He had a wonderful ability in pointing out the weak points of an agreement or a balance-sheet, all the while protesting he was no lawyer or accountant; and his views were expressed in very few words, but in a characteristic and emphatic manner.
We owe a lot to Mr. Insull for a vivid portrayal of Edison during this time and the conditions under which work was done and progress was made: "I don’t think I understood my responsibilities with Edison when I first started working with him. I simply did whatever he asked and handled all kinds of tasks, from buying his clothes to managing his business finances. I would open the mail and respond to it all, sometimes signing Edison's name with my initial and sometimes using my own name. If I went with the latter option and was addressing someone I didn’t know, I would sign as Edison's private secretary. I held his power of attorney and signed his checks. It was rare for Edison to sign a letter or check during this period. If he wanted to personally communicate with someone, especially a close associate, it would usually be a quick note written in pencil and signed 'Edison.' I was a shorthand writer, but I rarely took dictation from Edison unless it was on a technical topic I didn’t understand. I would go over the correspondence with Edison, sometimes making shorthand notes in the margins, and sometimes he would jot down his own thoughts on letters. I was expected to finalize the correspondence using Edison's brief comments as a guide for how to respond. It was quite common for Edison to write only 'Yes' or 'No,' and that would be all I had to work from for my reply. Edison often made notes on documents. He had an incredible knack for identifying the weak points in an agreement or a balance sheet, all while insisting he wasn’t a lawyer or accountant; his opinions were shared in very few words, but in a distinctive and forceful way."
"The first few months I was with Edison he spent most of the time in the office at 65 Fifth Avenue. Then there was a great deal of trouble with the life of the lamps there, and he disappeared from the office and spent his time largely at Menlo Park. At another time there was a great deal of trouble with some of the details of construction of the dynamos, and Edison spent a lot of time at Goerck Street, which had been rapidly equipped with the idea of turning out bi-polar dynamo-electric machines, direct-connected to the engine, the first of which went to Paris and London, while the next were installed in the old Pearl Street station of the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York, just south of Fulton Street, on the west side of the street. Edison devoted a great deal of his time to the engineering work in connection with the laying out of the first incandescent electric-lighting system in New York. Apparently at that time—between the end of 1881 and spring of 1882—the most serious work was the manufacture and installation of underground conductors in this territory. These conductors were manufactured by the Electric Tube Company, which Edison controlled in a shop at 65 Washington Street, run by John Kruesi. Half-round copper conductors were used, kept in place relatively to each other and in the tube, first of all by a heavy piece of cardboard, and later on by a rope; and then put in a twenty-foot iron pipe; and a combination of asphaltum and linseed oil was forced into the pipe for the insulation. I remember as a coincidence that the building was only twenty feet wide. These lengths of conductors were twenty feet six inches long, as the half-round coppers extended three inches beyond the drag-ends of the lengths of pipe; and in one of the operations we used to take the length of tubing out of the window in order to turn it around. I was elected secretary of the Electric Tube Company, and was expected to look after its finance; and it was in this position that my long intimacy with John Kruesi started."
The first few months I worked with Edison, he spent most of his time at the office on 65 Fifth Avenue. Then there were a lot of issues with the life of the lamps, and he vanished from the office to spend most of his time at Menlo Park. At another point, there were many problems with the details of constructing the dynamos, so Edison spent a lot of time at Goerck Street, which had quickly been set up to manufacture bi-polar dynamo-electric machines directly connected to the engine. The first of these machines went to Paris and London, while the next ones were installed at the old Pearl Street station of the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York, just south of Fulton Street on the west side. Edison devoted a lot of his time to the engineering work involved in setting up the first incandescent electric-lighting system in New York. Apparently, during that period—from late 1881 to spring 1882—the most pressing task was the production and installation of underground conductors in that area. These conductors were made by the Electric Tube Company, which Edison ran from a shop at 65 Washington Street, managed by John Kruesi. Half-round copper conductors were used, held in place relative to each other and in the tube first by a thick piece of cardboard and later by a rope; then they were put into a twenty-foot iron pipe, and a mix of asphaltum and linseed oil was forced into the pipe for insulation. I remember coincidentally that the building was only twenty feet wide. These lengths of conductors were twenty feet six inches long, as the half-round coppers extended three inches beyond the ends of the lengths of pipe; and in one of the processes, we would take the length of tubing out the window to turn it around. I was elected secretary of the Electric Tube Company and was expected to handle its finances; it was in this role that my long relationship with John Kruesi began.
At this juncture a large part of the correspondence referred very naturally to electric lighting, embodying requests for all kinds of information, catalogues, prices, terms, etc.; and all these letters were turned over to the lighting company by Edison for attention. The company was soon swamped with propositions for sale of territorial rights and with other negotiations, and some of these were accompanied by the offer of very large sums of money. It was the beginning of the electric-light furor which soon rose to sensational heights. Had the company accepted the cash offers from various localities, it could have gathered several millions of dollars at once into its treasury; but this was not at all in accord with Mr. Edison's idea, which was to prove by actual experience the commercial value of the system, and then to license central-station companies in large cities and towns, the parent company taking a percentage of their capital for the license under the Edison patents, and contracting also for the supply of apparatus, lamps, etc. This left the remainder of the country open for the cash sale of plants wherever requested. His counsels prevailed, and the wisdom of the policy adopted was seen in the swift establishment of Edison companies in centres of population both great and small, whose business has ever been a constant and growing source of income for the parent manufacturing interests.
At this point, a lot of the correspondence naturally focused on electric lighting, with requests for all kinds of information, catalogs, prices, terms, and so on; all these letters were forwarded to the lighting company by Edison for review. The company quickly became overwhelmed with proposals for selling territorial rights and other negotiations, some of which included offers of very large sums of money. This marked the start of the electric-light craze, which soon reached sensational levels. If the company had accepted the cash offers from various places, it could have immediately collected several million dollars; however, this was not at all in line with Mr. Edison's vision, which was to demonstrate the commercial value of the system through actual experience. He planned to then license central-station companies in major cities and towns, with the parent company taking a percentage of their capital for the license under the Edison patents, and also contracting for the supply of equipment, lamps, and so on. This approach left the rest of the country open for cash sales of plants wherever needed. His advice won out, and the effectiveness of the policy was evident in the quick establishment of Edison companies in both large and small population centers, which have consistently provided a growing source of income for the parent manufacturing interests.
From first to last Edison has been an exponent and advocate of the central-station idea of distribution now so familiar to the public mind, but still very far from being carried out to its logical conclusion. In this instance, demands for isolated plants for lighting factories, mills, mines, hotels, etc., began to pour in, and something had to be done with them. This was a class of plant which the inquirers desired to purchase outright and operate themselves, usually because of remoteness from any possible source of general supply of current. It had not been Edison's intention to cater to this class of customer until his broad central-station plan had been worked out, and he has always discouraged the isolated plant within the limits of urban circuits; but this demand was so insistent it could not be denied, and it was deemed desirable to comply with it at once, especially as it was seen that the steady call for supplies and renewals would benefit the new Edison manufacturing plants. After a very short trial, it was found necessary to create a separate organization for this branch of the industry, leaving the Edison Electric Light Company to continue under the original plan of operation as a parent, patent-holding and licensing company. Accordingly a new and distinct corporation was formed called the Edison Company for Isolated Lighting, to which was issued a special license to sell and operate plants of a self-contained character. As a matter of fact such work began in advance of almost every other kind. A small plant using the paper-carbon filament lamps was furnished by Edison at the earnest solicitation of Mr. Henry Villard for the steamship Columbia, in 1879, and it is amusing to note that Mr. Upton carried the lamps himself to the ship, very tenderly and jealously, like fresh eggs, in a market-garden basket. The installation was most successful. Another pioneer plant was that equipped and started in January, 1881, for Hinds & Ketcham, a New York firm of lithographers and color printers, who had previously been able to work only by day, owing to difficulties in color-printing by artificial light. A year later they said: "It is the best substitute for daylight we have ever known, and almost as cheap."
From start to finish, Edison has been a proponent and supporter of the central-station distribution concept that is now so familiar to the public, yet still far from being fully realized. In this case, requests for independent plants to light factories, mills, mines, hotels, and more began to flood in, and something needed to be done. This was a type of plant that those inquiring wanted to buy outright and operate themselves, usually due to being far from any general source of electricity. Edison hadn't planned to serve this type of customer until his extensive central-station plan was fully developed, and he had always discouraged isolated plants within urban areas; however, the demand was so persistent it couldn't be ignored, and it was considered important to address it immediately, especially since it was clear that the ongoing demand for supplies and replacements would benefit the new Edison manufacturing facilities. After a very brief trial, it became clear that a separate organization was needed for this sector of the industry, allowing the Edison Electric Light Company to continue operating under the original plan as a parent, patent-holding, and licensing entity. Consequently, a new and distinct corporation was created called the Edison Company for Isolated Lighting, which received a special license to sell and operate self-contained plants. In fact, this work began ahead of nearly all other types. A small plant using paper-carbon filament lamps was supplied by Edison at the strong request of Mr. Henry Villard for the steamship Columbia in 1879, and it's amusing to note that Mr. Upton personally carried the lamps to the ship, handling them very gently and protectively, like fresh eggs, in a market-garden basket. The installation was highly successful. Another pioneering plant was set up and launched in January 1881 for Hinds & Ketcham, a New York lithography and color printing firm, which had previously only been able to work during the day due to challenges with color printing under artificial light. A year later, they stated, "It is the best substitute for daylight we have ever known, and almost as cheap."
Mr. Edison himself describes various instances in which the demand for isolated plants had to be met: "One night at '65,'" he says, "James Gordon Bennett came in. We were very anxious to get into a printing establishment. I had caused a printer's composing case to be set up with the idea that if we could get editors and publishers in to see it, we should show them the advantages of the electric light. So ultimately Mr. Bennett came, and after seeing the whole operation of everything, he ordered Mr. Howland, general manager of the Herald, to light the newspaper offices up at once with electricity."
Mr. Edison himself describes several situations where the need for isolated power plants had to be addressed: "One night in '65," he says, "James Gordon Bennett walked in. We were really eager to get into a printing business. I had set up a printer's composing case with the idea that if we could get editors and publishers to see it, we could show them the benefits of electric light. So, eventually, Mr. Bennett came, and after seeing everything in action, he instructed Mr. Howland, the general manager of the Herald, to light up the newspaper offices with electricity immediately."
Another instance of the same kind deals with the introduction of the light for purely social purposes: "While at 65 Fifth Avenue," remarks Mr. Edison, "I got to know Christian Herter, then the largest decorator in the United States. He was a highly intellectual man, and I loved to talk to him. He was always railing against the rich people, for whom he did work, for their poor taste. One day Mr. W. H. Vanderbilt came to '65,' saw the light, and decided that he would have his new house lighted with it. This was one of the big 'box houses' on upper Fifth Avenue. He put the whole matter in the hands of his son-in-law, Mr. H. McK. Twombly, who was then in charge of the telephone department of the Western Union. Twombly closed the contract with us for a plant. Mr. Herter was doing the decoration, and it was extraordinarily fine. After a while we got the engines and boilers and wires all done, and the lights in position, before the house was quite finished, and thought we would have an exhibit of the light. About eight o'clock in the evening we lit up, and it was very good. Mr. Vanderbilt and his wife and some of his daughters came in, and were there a few minutes when a fire occurred. The large picture-gallery was lined with silk cloth interwoven with fine metallic thread. In some manner two wires had got crossed with this tinsel, which became red-hot, and the whole mass was soon afire. I knew what was the matter, and ordered them to run down and shut off. It had not burst into flame, and died out immediately. Mrs. Vanderbilt became hysterical, and wanted to know where it came from. We told her we had the plant in the cellar, and when she learned we had a boiler there she said she would not occupy the house. She would not live over a boiler. We had to take the whole installation out. The houses afterward went onto the New York Edison system."
Another example of the same situation involves the introduction of electric light for social purposes: "While at 65 Fifth Avenue," Mr. Edison notes, "I got to know Christian Herter, who was then the biggest decorator in the United States. He was very intellectual, and I enjoyed our conversations. He often criticized the wealthy clients he worked for, complaining about their poor taste. One day, Mr. W. H. Vanderbilt visited '65,' saw the electric light, and decided to use it to light his new house. This was one of the grand ‘box houses’ on upper Fifth Avenue. He entrusted the project to his son-in-law, Mr. H. McK. Twombly, who was then running the telephone department at Western Union. Twombly settled the contract with us for a lighting setup. Mr. Herter was in charge of the decoration, which was incredibly beautiful. Eventually, we installed the engines, boilers, and wiring, and positioned the lights even before the house was completely finished, thinking we’d put on a showcase of the lighting. Around eight o'clock in the evening, we turned on the lights, and it looked great. Mr. Vanderbilt, his wife, and some of their daughters came in and were there for a few minutes when a fire broke out. The large picture gallery was decorated with silk cloth interwoven with fine metallic thread. Somehow, two wires crossed with this tinsel, causing it to overheat and catch fire. I quickly realized what was happening and ordered them to turn off the power. Thankfully, it hadn’t burst into flames and went out immediately. Mrs. Vanderbilt became very upset and wanted to know where the fire had come from. We explained that we had the plant in the cellar, and upon learning about the boiler, she declared she wouldn’t live in the house. She refused to occupy a home above a boiler. We had to take the entire installation out. Later, the houses were connected to the New York Edison system."
The art was, however, very crude and raw, and as there were no artisans in existence as mechanics or electricians who had any knowledge of the practice, there was inconceivable difficulty in getting such isolated plants installed, as well as wiring the buildings in the district to be covered by the first central station in New York. A night school was, therefore, founded at Fifth Avenue, and was put in charge of Mr. E. H. Johnson, fresh from his successes in England. The most available men for the purpose were, of course, those who had been accustomed to wiring for the simpler electrical systems then in vogue—telephones, district-messenger calls, burglar alarms, house annunciators, etc., and a number of these "wiremen" were engaged and instructed patiently in the rudiments of the new art by means of a blackboard and oral lessons. Students from the technical schools and colleges were also eager recruits, for here was something that promised a career, and one that was especially alluring to youth because of its novelty. These beginners were also instructed in general engineering problems under the guidance of Mr. C. L. Clarke, who was brought in from the Menlo Park laboratory to assume charge of the engineering part of the company's affairs. Many of these pioneer students and workmen became afterward large and successful contractors, or have filled positions of distinction as managers and superintendents of central stations. Possibly the electrical industry may not now attract as much adventurous genius as it did then, for automobiles, aeronautics, and other new arts have come to the front in a quarter of a century to enlist the enthusiasm of a younger generation of mercurial spirits; but it is certain that at the period of which we write, Edison himself, still under thirty-five, was the centre of an extraordinary group of men, full of effervescing and aspiring talent, to which he gave glorious opportunity.
The art was, however, very basic and rough, and since there were no skilled workers like mechanics or electricians with any knowledge of the trade, it was incredibly difficult to get these isolated plants set up, as well as wiring the buildings in the area for the first central station in New York. A night school was therefore established on Fifth Avenue and was run by Mr. E. H. Johnson, who had just come from his successes in England. The most suitable candidates for this were those who had experience wiring for the simpler electrical systems then in use—telephones, district-messenger calls, burglar alarms, house annunciators, etc. Several of these "wiremen" were employed and patiently taught the basics of the new trade using a blackboard and oral lessons. Students from technical schools and colleges were also eager recruits, as this offered a promising career, especially appealing to young people because of its novelty. These beginners also received instruction in general engineering challenges under the guidance of Mr. C. L. Clarke, who was brought in from the Menlo Park laboratory to oversee the engineering aspects of the company's operations. Many of these early students and workers later became successful contractors or held prominent positions as managers and superintendents of central stations. While the electrical industry may not attract as much adventurous talent today compared to then, given the rise of automobiles, aeronautics, and other new fields over the past twenty-five years to engage the enthusiasm of a new generation, it’s clear that at the time we’re writing about, Edison himself, still under thirty-five, was at the center of an extraordinary group of men brimming with energetic and aspiring talent, to whom he provided incredible opportunities.
A very novel literary feature of the work was the issuance of a bulletin devoted entirely to the Edison lighting propaganda. Nowadays the "house organ," as it is called, has become a very hackneyed feature of industrial development, confusing in its variety and volume, and a somewhat doubtful adjunct to a highly perfected, widely circulating periodical technical press. But at that time, 1882, the Bulletin of the Edison Electric Light Company, published in ordinary 12mo form, was distinctly new in advertising and possibly unique, as it is difficult to find anything that compared with it. The Bulletin was carried on for some years, until its necessity was removed by the development of other opportunities for reaching the public; and its pages serve now as a vivid and lively picture of the period to which its record applies. The first issue, of January 12, 1882, was only four pages, but it dealt with the question of insurance; plants at Santiago, Chili, and Rio de Janeiro; the European Company with 3,500,000 francs subscribed; the work in Paris, London, Strasburg, and Moscow; the laying of over six miles of street mains in New York; a patent decision in favor of Edison; and the size of safety catch wire. By April of 1882, the Bulletin had attained the respectable size of sixteen pages; and in December it was a portly magazine of forty-eight. Every item bears testimony to the rapid progress being made; and by the end of 1882 it is seen that no fewer than 153 isolated Edison plants had been installed in the United States alone, with a capacity of 29,192 lamps. Moreover, the New York central station had gone into operation, starting at 3 P.M. on September 4, and at the close of 1882 it was lighting 225 houses wired for about 5000 lamps. This epochal story will be told in the next chapter. Most interesting are the Bulletin notes from England, especially in regard to the brilliant exhibition given by Mr. E. H. Johnson at the Crystal Palace, Sydenham, visited by the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, twice by the Dukes of Westminster and Sutherland, by three hundred members of the Gas Institute, and by innumerable delegations from cities, boroughs, etc. Describing this before the Royal Society of Arts, Sir W. H. Preece, F.R.S., remarked: "Many unkind things have been said of Mr. Edison and his promises; perhaps no one has been severer in this direction than myself. It is some gratification for me to announce my belief that he has at last solved the problem he set himself to solve, and to be able to describe to the Society the way in which he has solved it." Before the exhibition closed it was visited by the Prince and Princess of Wales—now the deceased Edward VII. and the Dowager Queen Alexandra—and the Princess received from Mr. Johnson as a souvenir a tiny electric chandelier fashioned like a bouquet of fern leaves and flowers, the buds being some of the first miniature incandescent lamps ever made.
A unique feature of the work was the release of a bulletin focused entirely on Edison lighting propaganda. Today, the "house organ," as it's often called, has become a clichéd element of industrial growth, overwhelming in its variety and volume, and somewhat questionable as an addition to a well-polished, widely distributed technical magazine. However, back in 1882, the Bulletin of the Edison Electric Light Company, published in standard 12mo format, was truly novel in advertising and possibly one-of-a-kind, as there's not much that compares to it. The Bulletin ran for several years until it was no longer needed due to new ways of reaching the public, and its pages now offer a vivid snapshot of the time it chronicles. The first issue, dated January 12, 1882, was just four pages long but covered topics like insurance; plants in Santiago, Chile, and Rio de Janeiro; a European Company with 3,500,000 francs subscribed; developments in Paris, London, Strasbourg, and Moscow; the installation of over six miles of street mains in New York; a patent ruling in favor of Edison; and details about safety catch wire. By April 1882, the Bulletin had grown to a respectable sixteen pages; by December, it became a hefty magazine of forty-eight pages. Every article showcases the swift advancements being made; by the end of 1882, there were 153 standalone Edison plants installed in the United States, with a total capacity of 29,192 lamps. Additionally, the New York central station had begun operations at 3 PM on September 4 and by the end of the year, it was lighting 225 houses wired for around 5,000 lamps. This groundbreaking story will be detailed in the next chapter. Notably, the Bulletin included updates from England, especially regarding the impressive exhibition by Mr. E. H. Johnson at the Crystal Palace, Sydenham, which was attended by the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, twice by the Dukes of Westminster and Sutherland, by 300 members of the Gas Institute, and countless delegations from various cities and boroughs. While discussing this before the Royal Society of Arts, Sir W. H. Preece, F.R.S., stated: "Many unkind things have been said about Mr. Edison and his promises; perhaps no one has been more critical than I. It gives me some satisfaction to declare my belief that he has finally solved the problem he set out to tackle, and to share with the Society how he has accomplished it." Before the exhibition ended, it was visited by the Prince and Princess of Wales—later Edward VII and Dowager Queen Alexandra—and the Princess received from Mr. Johnson a small electric chandelier designed like a bouquet of fern leaves and flowers, with the buds being some of the first miniature incandescent lamps ever created.
The first item in the first Bulletin dealt with the "Fire Question," and all through the successive issues runs a series of significant items on the same subject. Many of them are aimed at gas, and there are several grim summaries of death and fires due to gas-leaks or explosions. A tendency existed at the time to assume that electricity was altogether safe, while its opponents, predicating their attacks on arc-lighting casualties, insisted it was most dangerous. Edison's problem in educating the public was rather difficult, for while his low-pressure, direct-current system has always been absolutely without danger to life, there has also been the undeniable fact that escaping electricity might cause a fire just as a leaky water-pipe can flood a house. The important question had arisen, therefore, of satisfying the fire underwriters as to the safety of the system. He had foreseen that there would be an absolute necessity for special devices to prevent fires from occurring by reason of any excess of current flowing in any circuit; and several of his earliest detail lighting inventions deal with this subject. The insurance underwriters of New York and other parts of the country gave a great deal of time and study to the question through their most expert representatives, with the aid of Edison and his associates, other electric-light companies cooperating; and the knowledge thus gained was embodied in insurance rules to govern wiring for electric lights, formulated during the latter part of 1881, adopted by the New York Board of Fire Underwriters, January 12, 1882, and subsequently endorsed by other boards in the various insurance districts. Under temporary rulings, however, a vast amount of work had already been done, but it was obvious that as the industry grew there would be less and less possibility of supervision except through such regulations, insisting upon the use of the best devices and methods. Indeed, the direct superintendence soon became unnecessary, owing to the increasing knowledge and greater skill acquired by the installing staff; and this system of education was notably improved by a manual written by Mr. Edison himself. Copies of this brochure are as scarce to-day as First Folio Shakespeares, and command prices equal to those of other American first editions. The little book is the only known incursion of its author into literature, if we except the brief articles he has written for technical papers and for the magazines. It contained what was at once a full, elaborate, and terse explanation of a complete isolated plant, with diagrams of various methods of connection and operation, and a carefully detailed description of every individual part, its functions and its characteristics. The remarkable success of those early years was indeed only achieved by following up with Chinese exactness the minute and intimate methods insisted upon by Edison as to the use of the apparatus and devices employed. It was a curious example of establishing standard practice while changing with kaleidoscopic rapidity all the elements involved. He was true to an ideal as to the pole-star, but was incessantly making improvements in every direction. With an iconoclasm that has often seemed ruthless and brutal he did not hesitate to sacrifice older devices the moment a new one came in sight that embodied a real advance in securing effective results. The process is heroic but costly. Nobody ever had a bigger scrap-heap than Edison; but who dare proclaim the process intrinsically wasteful if the losses occur in the initial stages, and the economies in all the later ones?
The first item in the first Bulletin addressed the "Fire Question," and throughout the subsequent issues, there are several significant entries on the same topic. Many of these focus on gas, and there are several stark summaries of deaths and fires caused by gas leaks or explosions. At that time, people generally assumed electricity was completely safe, while its critics, citing incidents involving arc lighting, argued it was very dangerous. Edison's challenge in educating the public was quite difficult because, while his low-pressure, direct-current system has always been completely safe for life, there was also the undeniable truth that escaping electricity could start a fire just like a leaky water pipe can flood a house. Therefore, an important question arose about how to convince fire underwriters of the system's safety. He anticipated a clear need for special devices to prevent fires from happening due to excessive current flowing in any circuit, which is why several of his early lighting inventions focused on this issue. Insurance underwriters in New York and other regions invested significant time and resources into this topic, collaborating with Edison and his associates, along with other electric-light companies. The knowledge gained from this collaboration was incorporated into insurance rules governing electric light wiring, which were developed in late 1881, adopted by the New York Board of Fire Underwriters on January 12, 1882, and later endorsed by other boards across various insurance districts. Under temporary regulations, a considerable amount of work had already been done, but it was clear that as the industry expanded, it would become harder to supervise without effective regulations mandating the use of the best devices and practices. In fact, direct oversight soon became unnecessary due to the increasing knowledge and skill gained by the installation teams; this education process was significantly enhanced by a manual written by Mr. Edison himself. Copies of this brochure are just as rare today as First Folio Shakespeares and fetch prices comparable to those of other American first editions. This little book is the only known venture into literature by its author, aside from the brief articles he's written for technical papers and magazines. It contained a comprehensive, detailed yet concise explanation of a complete isolated plant, including diagrams of various connections and operations, along with a meticulously detailed description of each individual part, its functions, and characteristics. The remarkable success of those early years was indeed achieved by rigorously adhering to the precise methods that Edison insisted on for using the apparatus and devices involved. It was a unique case of establishing standard practice while rapidly changing all the different elements at play. He remained true to his ideal like a North Star while constantly making improvements in every direction. With a boldness that often seemed ruthless, he didn’t hesitate to abandon older devices as soon as a new one appeared that represented a genuine advance in achieving effective outcomes. This process is heroic but expensive. Nobody ever had a bigger scrap heap than Edison; but who would dare claim the process is inherently wasteful if losses occur in the early stages and savings are realized in all the later ones?
With Edison in this introduction of his lighting system the method was ruthless, but not reckless. At an early stage of the commercial development a standardizing committee was formed, consisting of the heads of all the departments, and to this body was intrusted the task of testing and criticising all existing and proposed devices, as well as of considering the suggestions and complaints of workmen offered from time to time. This procedure was fruitful in two principal results—the education of the whole executive force in the technical details of the system; and a constant improvement in the quality of the Edison installations; both contributing to the rapid growth of the industry.
With Edison introducing his lighting system, the approach was tough, but not careless. Early in the commercial development, a standardizing committee was formed, made up of the heads of all departments. This group was responsible for testing and evaluating all existing and proposed devices, as well as considering the suggestions and complaints of workers that came up over time. This process led to two main outcomes—the education of the entire executive team on the technical details of the system; and a continuous improvement in the quality of the Edison installations; both of which contributed to the quick growth of the industry.
For many years Goerck Street played an important part in Edison's affairs, being the centre of all his manufacture of heavy machinery. But it was not in a desirable neighborhood, and owing to the rapid growth of the business soon became disadvantageous for other reasons. Edison tells of his frequent visits to the shops at night, with the escort of "Jim" Russell, a well-known detective, who knew all the denizens of the place: "We used to go out at night to a little, low place, an all-night house—eight feet wide and twenty-two feet long—where we got a lunch at two or three o'clock in the morning. It was the toughest kind of restaurant ever seen. For the clam chowder they used the same four clams during the whole season, and the average number of flies per pie was seven. This was by actual count."
For many years, Goerck Street was a key location for Edison’s operations, serving as the hub for his heavy machinery production. However, it wasn't in a great neighborhood, and due to the rapid expansion of the business, it soon became problematic for other reasons. Edison recalls his frequent nighttime visits to the shops, accompanied by "Jim" Russell, a well-known detective who was familiar with all the locals: "We used to go out at night to a small, rundown place, an all-night spot—just eight feet wide and twenty-two feet long—where we’d grab a late-night meal at two or three o'clock in the morning. It was the roughest kind of restaurant you could imagine. They used the same four clams for the clam chowder all season long, and the average number of flies per pie was seven. This was based on actual counting."
As to the shops and the locality: "The street was lined with rather old buildings and poor tenements. We had not much frontage. As our business increased enormously, our quarters became too small, so we saw the district Tammany leader and asked him if we could not store castings and other things on the sidewalk. He gave us permission—told us to go ahead, and he would see it was all right. The only thing he required for this was that when a man was sent with a note from him asking us to give him a job, he was to be put on. We had a hand-laborer foreman—'Big Jim'—a very powerful Irishman, who could lift above half a ton. When one of the Tammany aspirants appeared, he was told to go right to work at $1.50 per day. The next day he was told off to lift a certain piece, and if the man could not lift it he was discharged. That made the Tammany man all safe. Jim could pick the piece up easily. The other man could not, and so we let him out. Finally the Tammany leader called a halt, as we were running big engine lathes out on the sidewalk, and he was afraid we were carrying it a little too far. The lathes were worked right out in the street, and belted through the windows of the shop."
As for the shops and the area: "The street was lined with pretty old buildings and rundown apartments. We didn't have much space out front. As our business grew significantly, our place became too small, so we approached the district Tammany leader and asked if we could store castings and other items on the sidewalk. He agreed—told us to go for it, and he would make sure it was fine. The only thing he asked was that if he sent someone with a note asking us to hire them, we had to take them on. We had a foreman, ‘Big Jim’—a really strong Irishman who could lift over half a ton. When one of the Tammany candidates showed up, he was told to get to work at $1.50 a day. The next day he was assigned to lift a specific piece, and if he couldn't lift it, he was let go. That kept the Tammany guy safe. Jim could pick the piece up with no problem. The other guy couldn't, so we had to let him go. Eventually, the Tammany leader called it off, as we were running large engine lathes out on the sidewalk, and he was worried we were pushing it a bit too far. The lathes were set up right in the street and connected through the shop windows."
At last it became necessary to move from Goerck Street, and Mr. Edison gives a very interesting account of the incidents in connection with the transfer of the plant to Schenectady, New York: "After our works at Goerck Street got too small, we had labor troubles also. It seems I had rather a socialistic strain in me, and I raised the pay of the workmen twenty-five cents an hour above the prevailing rate of wages, whereupon Hoe & Company, our near neighbors, complained at our doing this. I said I thought it was all right. But the men, having got a little more wages, thought they would try coercion and get a little more, as we were considered soft marks. Whereupon they struck at a time that was critical. However, we were short of money for pay-rolls; and we concluded it might not be so bad after all, as it would give us a couple of weeks to catch up. So when the men went out they appointed a committee to meet us; but for two weeks they could not find us, so they became somewhat more anxious than we were. Finally they said they would like to go back. We said all right, and back they went. It was quite a novelty to the men not to be able to find us when they wanted to; and they didn't relish it at all.
At last, we needed to move from Goerck Street, and Mr. Edison offers a really interesting account of the events surrounding the relocation of the plant to Schenectady, New York: "After our operations at Goerck Street got too cramped, we also faced labor issues. I guess I had a bit of a socialistic side, so I raised the pay of the workers twenty-five cents an hour above the usual wage. Our nearby neighbors, Hoe & Company, complained about this. I thought it was fine. However, the workers, having received a little raise, thought they could push for more since we were seen as easy targets. They decided to go on strike at a critical time. We were running low on money for payroll, and we figured it might not be so bad since it would give us a couple of weeks to catch up. When the workers went out, they formed a committee to talk to us, but for two weeks they couldn't find us, which made them more anxious than we were. Finally, they said they wanted to return. We agreed, and they went back. It was quite a surprise for the workers not to be able to locate us when they wanted to; they didn't like it at all."
"What with these troubles and the lack of room, we decided to find a factory elsewhere, and decided to try the locomotive works up at Schenectady. It seems that the people there had had a falling out among themselves, and one of the directors had started opposition works; but before he had completed all the buildings and put in machinery some compromise was made, and the works were for sale. We bought them very reasonably and moved everything there. These works were owned by me and my assistants until sold to the Edison General Electric Company. At one time we employed several thousand men; and since then the works have been greatly expanded.
"Given these issues and the lack of space, we decided to find a factory somewhere else and try the locomotive works in Schenectady. It turns out the people there had a disagreement among themselves, and one of the directors started competing works; but before he finished building everything and installing the machinery, a compromise was reached, and the works went up for sale. We bought them at a reasonable price and moved everything there. I owned these works along with my team until we sold them to the Edison General Electric Company. At one point, we employed several thousand workers, and since then, the works have been significantly expanded."
"At these new works our orders were far in excess of our capital to handle the business, and both Mr. Insull and I were afraid we might get into trouble for lack of money. Mr. Insull was then my business manager, running the whole thing; and, therefore, when Mr. Henry Villard and his syndicate offered to buy us out, we concluded it was better to be sure than be sorry; so we sold out for a large sum. Villard was a very aggressive man with big ideas, but I could never quite understand him. He had no sense of humor. I remember one time we were going up on the Hudson River boat to inspect the works, and with us was Mr. Henderson, our chief engineer, who was certainly the best raconteur of funny stories I ever knew. We sat at the tail-end of the boat, and he started in to tell funny stories. Villard could not see a single point, and scarcely laughed at all; and Henderson became so disconcerted he had to give it up. It was the same way with Gould. In the early telegraph days I remember going with him to see Mackay in 'The Impecunious Country Editor.' It was very funny, full of amusing and absurd situations; but Gould never smiled once."
"At these new projects, our orders far exceeded our financial capacity to manage the business, and both Mr. Insull and I were worried we might run into financial trouble. Mr. Insull was my business manager at the time, overseeing everything; so when Mr. Henry Villard and his group offered to buy us out, we decided it was wiser to be safe than sorry and sold out for a substantial amount. Villard was a very ambitious guy with grand ideas, but I could never fully grasp him. He had no sense of humor. I remember one time we were on a boat up the Hudson River to inspect the works, and with us was Mr. Henderson, our chief engineer, who was definitely the best storyteller of funny anecdotes I had ever known. We sat at the back of the boat, and he began sharing funny stories. Villard didn’t get any of it and barely laughed at all; Henderson became so uncomfortable he had to stop. It was the same with Gould. In the early days of telegraphy, I remember going with him to see Mackay in 'The Impecunious Country Editor.' It was hilarious, filled with amusing and ridiculous situations; but Gould never cracked a smile."
The formation of the Edison General Electric Company involved the consolidation of the immediate Edison manufacturing interests in electric light and power, with a capitalization of $12,000,000, now a relatively modest sum; but in those days the amount was large, and the combination caused a great deal of newspaper comment as to such a coinage of brain power. The next step came with the creation of the great General Electric Company of to-day, a combination of the Edison, Thomson-Houston, and Brush lighting interests in manufacture, which to this day maintains the ever-growing plants at Harrison, Lynn, and Schenectady, and there employs from twenty to twenty-five thousand people.
The formation of the Edison General Electric Company involved bringing together the immediate Edison manufacturing interests in electric light and power, with a capitalization of $12,000,000, which is now a relatively modest amount; but back then, it was substantial, and the merger drew a lot of media attention regarding such a collection of intellectual talent. The next step was the creation of the great General Electric Company we know today, which combined the Edison, Thomson-Houston, and Brush lighting manufacturing interests. To this day, it operates the ever-expanding plants in Harrison, Lynn, and Schenectady, employing between twenty and twenty-five thousand people.
CHAPTER XVI
THE FIRST EDISON CENTRAL STATION
A NOTED inventor once said at the end of a lifetime of fighting to defend his rights, that he found there were three stages in all great inventions: the first, in which people said the thing could not be done; the second, in which they said anybody could do it; and the third, in which they said it had always been done by everybody. In his central-station work Edison has had very much this kind of experience; for while many of his opponents came to acknowledge the novelty and utility of his plans, and gave him unstinted praise, there are doubtless others who to this day profess to look upon him merely as an adapter. How different the view of so eminent a scientist as Lord Kelvin was, may be appreciated from his remark when in later years, in reply to the question why some one else did not invent so obvious and simple a thing as the Feeder System, he said: "The only answer I can think of is that no one else was Edison."
A well-known inventor once said at the end of a lifetime of fighting to defend his rights that he found there are three stages in all great inventions: first, when people say it can't be done; second, when they say anyone could do it; and third, when they claim it has always been done by everyone. In his work with central stations, Edison had a similar experience; while many of his opponents eventually recognized the uniqueness and usefulness of his plans and praised him heavily, there are still others who today view him merely as an adapter. The perspective of such a distinguished scientist as Lord Kelvin can be understood from his comment years later, when asked why someone else didn’t invent something as obvious and simple as the Feeder System. He replied, "The only answer I can think of is that no one else was Edison."
Undaunted by the attitude of doubt and the predictions of impossibility, Edison had pushed on until he was now able to realize all his ideas as to the establishment of a central station in the work that culminated in New York City in 1882. After he had conceived the broad plan, his ambition was to create the initial plant on Manhattan Island, where it would be convenient of access for watching its operation, and where the demonstration of its practicability would have influence in financial circles. The first intention was to cover a district extending from Canal Street on the north to Wall Street on the south; but Edison soon realized that this territory was too extensive for the initial experiment, and he decided finally upon the district included between Wall, Nassau, Spruce, and Ferry streets, Peck Slip and the East River, an area nearly a square mile in extent. One of the preliminary steps taken to enable him to figure on such a station and system was to have men go through this district on various days and note the number of gas jets burning at each hour up to two or three o'clock in the morning. The next step was to divide the region into a number of sub-districts and institute a house-to-house canvass to ascertain precisely the data and conditions pertinent to the project. When the canvass was over, Edison knew exactly how many gas jets there were in every building in the entire district, the average hours of burning, and the cost of light; also every consumer of power, and the quantity used; every hoistway to which an electric motor could be applied; and other details too numerous to mention, such as related to the gas itself, the satisfaction of the customers, and the limitations of day and night demand. All this information was embodied graphically in large maps of the district, by annotations in colored inks; and Edison thus could study the question with every detail before him. Such a reconnaissance, like that of a coming field of battle, was invaluable, and may help give a further idea of the man's inveterate care for the minutiae of things.
Unfazed by doubts and predictions of failure, Edison persisted until he was able to bring his vision of a central station to life, culminating in New York City in 1882. Once he had developed the overall plan, he aimed to build the first plant on Manhattan Island, where it would be easy to monitor its operations and where showcasing its viability would impact financial circles. Initially, he wanted to cover an area from Canal Street in the north to Wall Street in the south; however, Edison quickly recognized that this area was too large for the first experiment. He ultimately settled on the district bounded by Wall, Nassau, Spruce, and Ferry streets, Peck Slip, and the East River, which was nearly a square mile in size. One of the first steps he took to assess the feasibility of such a station and system was to have men survey the district on different days and record the number of gas lights burning at each hour until two or three o'clock in the morning. The next step was to break the area into several sub-districts and conduct a house-to-house survey to gather precise data and conditions relevant to the project. Once the survey was complete, Edison knew exactly how many gas lights were in every building throughout the district, the average burning hours, and the cost of illumination; he had information on every power consumer and the energy used; every hoistway where an electric motor could be installed; and other details too many to list, including aspects related to the gas, customer satisfaction, and the limitations of daytime and nighttime demand. All this information was visually represented in large maps of the district, annotated with colored inks, allowing Edison to analyze the situation with every detail laid out before him. Such reconnaissance, much like that of preparing for a battlefield, was invaluable and reflects his meticulous attention to detail.
The laboratory note-books of this period—1878-80, more particularly—show an immense amount of calculation by Edison and his chief mathematician, Mr. Upton, on conductors for the distribution of current over large areas, and then later in the district described. With the results of this canvass before them, the sizes of the main conductors to be laid throughout the streets of this entire territory were figured, block by block; and the results were then placed on the map. These data revealed the fact that the quantity of copper required for the main conductors would be exceedingly large and costly; and, if ever, Edison was somewhat dismayed. But as usual this apparently insurmountable difficulty only spurred him on to further effort. It was but a short time thereafter that he solved the knotty problem by an invention mentioned in a previous chapter. This is known as the "feeder and main" system, for which he signed the application for a patent on August 4, 1880. As this invention effected a saving of seven-eighths of the cost of the chief conductors in a straight multiple arc system, the mains for the first district were refigured, and enormous new maps were made, which became the final basis of actual installation, as they were subsequently enlarged by the addition of every proposed junction-box, bridge safety-catch box, and street-intersection box in the whole area.
The lab notebooks from this period—1878-80, especially—show a ton of calculations by Edison and his lead mathematician, Mr. Upton, on conductors for distributing current over large areas, and later in the district described. With the results of this analysis in hand, they calculated the sizes of the main conductors to be laid out through the streets of the entire territory, block by block; and the results were then marked on the map. This data revealed that the amount of copper needed for the main conductors would be extremely large and expensive, and Edison was somewhat taken aback. But as usual, this seemingly insurmountable challenge only motivated him to push harder. It wasn’t long after that he tackled this tricky problem with an invention mentioned in a previous chapter. This is known as the "feeder and main" system, for which he filed a patent application on August 4, 1880. Since this invention resulted in a savings of seven-eighths of the cost of the main conductors in a straight multiple arc system, the mains for the first district were recalculated, and huge new maps were created, which became the final basis for the actual installation, as they were later expanded to include every proposed junction box, bridge safety catch box, and street intersection box in the whole area.
When this patent, after protracted fighting, was sustained by Judge Green in 1893, the Electrical Engineer remarked that the General Electric Company "must certainly feel elated" because of its importance; and the journal expressed its fear that although the specifications and claims related only to the maintenance of uniform pressure of current on lighting circuits, the owners might naturally seek to apply it also to feeders used in the electric-railway work already so extensive. At this time, however, the patent had only about a year of life left, owing to the expiration of the corresponding English patent. The fact that thirteen years had elapsed gives a vivid idea of the ordeal involved in sustaining a patent and the injustice to the inventor, while there is obviously hardship to those who cannot tell from any decision of the court whether they are infringing or not. It is interesting to note that the preparation for hearing this case in New Jersey was accompanied by models to show the court exactly the method and its economy, as worked out in comparison with what is known as the "tree system" of circuits—the older alternative way of doing it. As a basis of comparison, a district of thirty-six city blocks in the form of a square was assumed. The power station was placed at the centre of the square; each block had sixteen consumers using fifteen lights each. Conductors were run from the station to supply each of the four quarters of the district with light. In one example the "feeder" system was used; in the other the "tree." With these models were shown two cubes which represented one one-hundredth of the actual quantity of copper required for each quarter of the district by the two-wire tree system as compared with the feeder system under like conditions. The total weight of copper for the four quarter districts by the tree system was 803,250 pounds, but when the feeder system was used it was only 128,739 pounds! This was a reduction from $23.24 per lamp for copper to $3.72 per lamp. Other models emphasized this extraordinary contrast. At the time Edison was doing this work on economizing in conductors, much of the criticism against him was based on the assumed extravagant use of copper implied in the obvious "tree" system, and it was very naturally said that there was not enough copper in the world to supply his demands. It is true that the modern electrical arts have been a great stimulator of copper production, now taking a quarter of all made; yet evidently but for such inventions as this such arts could not have come into existence at all, or else in growing up they would have forced copper to starvation prices. [11]
When this patent was upheld by Judge Green in 1893 after a lengthy battle, the Electrical Engineer noted that the General Electric Company "must certainly feel elated" due to its significance. The journal expressed concern that, although the specifications and claims were focused solely on maintaining a consistent current for lighting circuits, the owners might understandably want to apply it to feeders used in the already extensive electric railway work. However, at that time, the patent had only about a year before it expired, due to the corresponding English patent running out. The fact that thirteen years had gone by illustrates the struggle involved in sustaining a patent and the unfairness faced by the inventor, while also highlighting the difficulties for those unable to determine from any court ruling whether they are infringing or not. It's worth noting that preparing for the hearing of this case in New Jersey involved models to demonstrate to the court exactly how the method worked and how it was more economical compared to what’s known as the "tree system" of circuits—the older alternative method. For comparison, a district made up of thirty-six city blocks arranged in a square was used. The power station was located in the center of the square, with each block having sixteen consumers using fifteen lights each. Conductors were run from the station to supply light to each of the four quarters of the district. In one example, the "feeder" system was used; in the other, the "tree" system. Accompanying these models were two cubes that represented one one-hundredth of the actual amount of copper needed for each quarter of the district with the two-wire tree system compared to the feeder system under similar conditions. The total copper weight for the four quarter districts using the tree system was 803,250 pounds, whereas with the feeder system, it was only 128,739 pounds! This represented a drop from $23.24 per lamp for copper to $3.72 per lamp. Other models further highlighted this remarkable difference. At the time Edison was working on reducing conductor costs, much of the criticism against him stemmed from the assumed excessive use of copper associated with the obvious "tree" system, leading many to claim there wasn’t enough copper in the world to meet his demands. It's true that the modern electrical industry has greatly boosted copper production, accounting for a quarter of all made; yet clearly, without inventions like this one, such industries might never have come into being, or they would have driven copper prices to starvation levels.
[Footnote 11: For description of feeder patent see Appendix.]
[Footnote 11: For a description of the feeder patent, see Appendix.]
It should be borne in mind that from the outset Edison had determined upon installing underground conductors as the only permanent and satisfactory method for the distribution of current from central stations in cities; and that at Menlo Park he laid out and operated such a system with about four hundred and twenty-five lamps. The underground system there was limited to the immediate vicinity of the laboratory and was somewhat crude, as well as much less complicated than would be the network of over eighty thousand lineal feet, which he calculated to be required for the underground circuits in the first district of New York City. At Menlo Park no effort was made for permanency; no provision was needed in regard to occasional openings of the street for various purposes; no new customers were to be connected from time to time to the mains, and no repairs were within contemplation. In New York the question of permanency was of paramount importance, and the other contingencies were sure to arise as well as conditions more easy to imagine than to forestall. These problems were all attacked in a resolute, thoroughgoing manner, and one by one solved by the invention of new and unprecedented devices that were adequate for the purposes of the time, and which are embodied in apparatus of slight modification in use up to the present day.
It should be noted that from the beginning, Edison had decided to install underground cables as the only lasting and effective way to distribute electricity from central stations in cities. At Menlo Park, he set up and operated such a system with about four hundred and twenty-five lights. The underground system there was limited to the area around the laboratory and was somewhat basic, as well as much simpler than the network of over eighty thousand linear feet that he estimated would be needed for the underground circuits in the first district of New York City. At Menlo Park, there was no effort made for durability; there was no need to consider occasional street openings for various reasons; no new customers were to be added to the mains, and no repairs were anticipated. In New York, the issue of permanence was extremely important, and other challenges were sure to come up, as well as situations that were easier to imagine than to prevent. These issues were all addressed in a determined and thorough way, and one by one they were solved through the invention of new and innovative devices that were suitable for the needs of the time, many of which are still in use today, with only slight modifications.
Just what all this means it is hard for the present generation to imagine. New York and all the other great cities in 1882, and for some years thereafter, were burdened and darkened by hideous masses of overhead wires carried on ugly wooden poles along all the main thoroughfares. One after another rival telegraph and telephone, stock ticker, burglar-alarm, and other companies had strung their circuits without any supervision or restriction; and these wires in all conditions of sag or decay ramified and crisscrossed in every direction, often hanging broken and loose-ended for months, there being no official compulsion to remove any dead wire. None of these circuits carried dangerous currents; but the introduction of the arc light brought an entirely new menace in the use of pressures that were even worse than the bully of the West who "kills on sight," because this kindred peril was invisible, and might lurk anywhere. New poles were put up, and the lighting circuits on them, with but a slight insulation of cotton impregnated with some "weather-proof" compound, straggled all over the city exposed to wind and rain and accidental contact with other wires, or with the metal of buildings. So many fatalities occurred that the insulated wire used, called "underwriters," because approved by the insurance bodies, became jocularly known as "undertakers," and efforts were made to improve its protective qualities. Then came the overhead circuits for distributing electrical energy to motors for operating elevators, driving machinery, etc., and these, while using a lower, safer potential, were proportionately larger. There were no wires underground. Morse had tried that at the very beginning of electrical application, in telegraphy, and all agreed that renewals of the experiment were at once costly and foolish. At last, in cities like New York, what may be styled generically the "overhead system" of wires broke down under its own weight; and various methods of underground conductors were tried, hastened in many places by the chopping down of poles and wires as the result of some accident that stirred the public indignation. One typical tragic scene was that in New York, where, within sight of the City Hall, a lineman was killed at his work on the arc light pole, and his body slowly roasted before the gaze of the excited populace, which for days afterward dropped its silver and copper coin into the alms-box nailed to the fatal pole for the benefit of his family. Out of all this in New York came a board of electrical control, a conduit system, and in the final analysis the Public Service Commission, that is credited to Governor Hughes as the furthest development of utility corporation control.
It's hard for today's generation to fully grasp what all this meant. New York and other major cities in 1882, and for several years after, were overwhelmed and darkened by ugly clusters of overhead wires strung on unattractive wooden poles along all the main roads. One after another, competing telegraph and telephone, stock ticker, burglar-alarm, and other companies installed their circuits without any oversight or regulations; these wires, sagging or decaying, tangled and crisscrossed in every direction, often dangling broken and disconnected for months, with no official requirement to remove the dead wires. None of these circuits carried dangerous currents; however, the arrival of the arc light introduced a completely new danger that was even worse than the lawless West where someone "kills on sight," because this danger was invisible and could be anywhere. New poles were erected, and the lighting circuits on them, with only minimal insulation made of cotton soaked in some "weather-proof" substance, sprawled all over the city, exposed to wind and rain and accidental contact with other wires or building metal. There were so many fatalities that the insulated wire used, known as "underwriters" because it was approved by insurance companies, humorously became known as "undertakers," leading to efforts to enhance its protective qualities. Then, overhead circuits for distributing electrical energy to motors for elevators, machinery, etc., were introduced, utilizing a lower, safer voltage but were proportionately larger. There were no underground wires. Morse had attempted that at the dawn of electrical use in telegraphy, and everyone agreed that renewing the experiment was both expensive and foolish. Eventually, in cities like New York, what could be called the "overhead system" of wires collapsed under its own weight; various underground conductor methods were experimented with, spurred on in many areas by the cutting down of poles and wires due to accidents that ignited public outrage. One particularly tragic scene occurred in New York, where, within sight of City Hall, a lineman was killed while working on an arc light pole, and his body slowly burned before the eyes of a shocked crowd, which for days afterward dropped silver and copper coins into a charity box attached to the tragic pole for the benefit of his family. From all of this in New York emerged a board of electrical control, a conduit system, and ultimately the Public Service Commission, credited to Governor Hughes as the greatest advancement in utility corporation regulation.
The "road to yesterday" back to Edison and his insistence on underground wires is a long one, but the preceding paragraph traces it. Even admitting that the size and weight of his low-tension conductors necessitated putting them underground, this argues nothing against the propriety and sanity of his methods. He believed deeply and firmly in the analogy between electrical supply and that for water and gas, and pointed to the trite fact that nobody hoisted the water and gas mains into the air on stilts, and that none of the pressures were inimical to human safety. The arc-lighting methods were unconsciously and unwittingly prophetic of the latter-day long-distance transmissions at high pressure that, electrically, have placed the energy of Niagara at the command of Syracuse and Utica, and have put the power of the falling waters of the Sierras at the disposal of San Francisco, two hundred miles away. But within city limits overhead wires, with such space-consuming potentials, are as fraught with mischievous peril to the public as the dynamite stored by a nonchalant contractor in the cellar of a schoolhouse. As an offset, then, to any tendency to depreciate the intrinsic value of Edison's lighting work, let the claim be here set forth modestly and subject to interference, that he was the father of underground wires in America, and by his example outlined the policy now dominant in every city of the first rank. Even the comment of a cynic in regard to electrical development may be accepted: "Some electrical companies wanted all the air; others apparently had use for all the water; Edison only asked for the earth."
The "road to yesterday" back to Edison and his insistence on underground wires is a long one, but the previous paragraph highlights it. Even if we acknowledge that the size and weight of his low-voltage conductors required them to be placed underground, this doesn't take away from the appropriateness and soundness of his methods. He strongly believed in the analogy between electrical supply and that of water and gas, pointing out the obvious fact that no one raises water and gas pipes into the air on stilts, and that none of the pressures are harmful to human safety. The arc-lighting methods were unintentionally prophetic of today's long-distance transmissions at high voltage, which have made Niagara's energy accessible to Syracuse and Utica, and have harnessed the power of the Sierra's falling waters for San Francisco, two hundred miles away. However, within city limits, overhead wires, with their space-consuming potential, pose as much danger to the public as if a careless contractor stored dynamite in the basement of a school. To counter any tendency to undervalue Edison's lighting work, let it be stated here, modestly and open to challenge, that he was the pioneer of underground wires in America, and his example set the policy now followed in every major city. Even a cynic's remark about electrical development may hold some truth: "Some electrical companies wanted to dominate the air; others seemed to want to control the water; Edison only asked for the earth."
The late Jacob Hess, a famous New York Republican politician, was a member of the commission appointed to put the wires underground in New York City, in the "eighties." He stated that when the commission was struggling with the problem, and examining all kinds of devices and plans, patented and unpatented, for which fabulous sums were often asked, the body turned to Edison in its perplexity and asked for advice. Edison said: "All you have to do, gentlemen, is to insulate your wires, draw them through the cheapest thing on earth—iron pipe—run your pipes through channels or galleries under the street, and you've got the whole thing done." This was practically the system adopted and in use to this day. What puzzled the old politician was that Edison would accept nothing for his advice.
The late Jacob Hess, a well-known Republican politician from New York, was part of the commission tasked with putting the wires underground in New York City during the 1880s. He recalled that when the commission was grappling with the issue and considering all sorts of devices and plans, both patented and unpatented, often priced at outrageous sums, they turned to Edison for guidance in their confusion. Edison said, "All you need to do, gentlemen, is to insulate your wires, run them through the cheapest material available—iron pipe—install your pipes in channels or galleries under the street, and you’ll have it all figured out." This is essentially the system that was adopted and is still in use today. What baffled the old politician was that Edison would accept nothing in return for his advice.
Another story may also be interpolated here as to the underground work done in New York for the first Edison station. It refers to the "man higher up," although the phrase had not been coined in those days of lower public morality. That a corporation should be "held up" was accepted philosophically by the corporation as one of the unavoidable incidents of its business; and if the corporation "got back" by securing some privilege without paying for it, the public was ready to condone if not applaud. Public utilities were in the making, and no one in particular had a keen sense of what was right or what was wrong, in the hard, practical details of their development. Edison tells this illuminating story: "When I was laying tubes in the streets of New York, the office received notice from the Commissioner of Public Works to appear at his office at a certain hour. I went up there with a gentleman to see the Commissioner, H. O. Thompson. On arrival he said to me: 'You are putting down these tubes. The Department of Public Works requires that you should have five inspectors to look after this work, and that their salary shall be $5 per day, payable at the end of each week. Good-morning.' I went out very much crestfallen, thinking I would be delayed and harassed in the work which I was anxious to finish, and was doing night and day. We watched patiently for those inspectors to appear. The only appearance they made was to draw their pay Saturday afternoon."
Another story can be added here about the underground work done in New York for the first Edison station. It mentions the "man higher up," even though that phrase hadn't been used back in those times of lower public morality. It was generally accepted by corporations that being "held up" was just one of the unavoidable aspects of their business; if a corporation managed to "get back" by obtaining some privilege without having to pay for it, the public was usually okay with it, if not outright supportive. Public utilities were being developed, and no one really had a clear sense of what was right or wrong regarding the practical details of that progress. Edison shares this enlightening story: "When I was laying tubes in the streets of New York, the office got a notice from the Commissioner of Public Works asking me to come to his office at a specific time. I went there with a colleague to see the Commissioner, H. O. Thompson. When we arrived, he told me, 'You’re installing these tubes. The Department of Public Works requires you to have five inspectors overseeing this work, and they need to be paid $5 a day, payable at the end of each week. Good morning.' I left feeling quite disheartened, thinking that this would slow me down and complicate the work I was eager to complete, which I was already working on day and night. We waited patiently for those inspectors to show up. The only time they appeared was to collect their pay on Saturday afternoons."
Just before Christmas in 1880—December 17—as an item for the silk stocking of Father Knickerbocker—the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York was organized. In pursuance of the policy adhered to by Edison, a license was issued to it for the exclusive use of the system in that territory—Manhattan Island—in consideration of a certain sum of money and a fixed percentage of its capital in stock for the patent rights. Early in 1881 it was altogether a paper enterprise, but events moved swiftly as narrated already, and on June 25, 1881, the first "Jumbo" prototype of the dynamo-electric machines to generate current at the Pearl Street station was put through its paces before being shipped to Paris to furnish new sensations to the flaneur of the boulevards. A number of the Edison officers and employees assembled at Goerck Street to see this "gigantic" machine go into action, and watched its performance with due reverence all through the night until five o'clock on Sunday morning, when it respected the conventionalities by breaking a shaft and suspending further tests. After this dynamo was shipped to France, and its successors to England for the Holborn Viaduct plant, Edison made still further improvements in design, increasing capacity and economy, and then proceeded vigorously with six machines for Pearl Street.
Just before Christmas in 1880—on December 17—the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York was established as a holiday gift for Father Knickerbocker. Following Edison's policy, a license was granted for the exclusive use of the system in Manhattan Island, in exchange for a specific amount of money and a fixed percentage of its stock for the patent rights. By early 1881, it was still just a paper venture, but things progressed quickly, as previously mentioned. On June 25, 1881, the first "Jumbo" prototype of the dynamo-electric machines designed to generate current at the Pearl Street station was tested before being sent to Paris to create new experiences for the flâneur of the boulevards. Several Edison officers and employees gathered on Goerck Street to watch this "gigantic" machine operate, observing it with respect throughout the night until five in the morning on Sunday, when it obediently broke a shaft and halted further tests. After this dynamo was shipped to France, and its successors sent to England for the Holborn Viaduct plant, Edison made additional design improvements, enhancing capacity and efficiency, and then energetically moved forward with six machines for Pearl Street.
An ideal location for any central station is at the very centre of the district served. It may be questioned whether it often goes there. In the New York first district the nearest property available was a double building at Nos. 255 and 257 Pearl Street, occupying a lot so by 100 feet. It was four stories high, with a fire-wall dividing it into two equal parts. One of these parts was converted for the uses of the station proper, and the other was used as a tube-shop by the underground construction department, as well as for repair-shops, storage, etc. Those were the days when no one built a new edifice for station purposes; that would have been deemed a fantastic extravagance. One early station in New York for arc lighting was an old soap-works whose well-soaked floors did not need much additional grease to render them choice fuel for the inevitable flames. In this Pearl Street instance, the building, erected originally for commercial uses, was quite incapable of sustaining the weight of the heavy dynamos and steam-engines to be installed on the second floor; so the old flooring was torn out and a new one of heavy girders supported by stiff columns was substituted. This heavy construction, more familiar nowadays, and not unlike the supporting metal structure of the Manhattan Elevated road, was erected independent of the enclosing walls, and occupied the full width of 257 Pearl Street, and about three-quarters of its depth. This change in the internal arrangements did not at all affect the ugly external appearance, which did little to suggest the stately and ornate stations since put up by the New York Edison Company, the latest occupying whole city blocks.
An ideal spot for any central station is right at the heart of the area it serves. It's worth questioning whether this often happens. In New York's first district, the closest available property was a double building at 255 and 257 Pearl Street, covering a lot measuring about 100 by 100 feet. It was four stories high, with a fire wall splitting it into two equal sections. One section was transformed for the station's official use, while the other served as a tube shop for the underground construction department, along with repair shops and storage. Back then, nobody built new structures for station purposes; that would have been considered a ridiculous extravagance. One of the early stations in New York for arc lighting was an old soap factory, where the well-soaked floors didn’t need much extra grease to turn into fuel for the inevitable fires. In the Pearl Street case, the building, originally designed for commercial purposes, couldn't handle the weight of the heavy dynamos and steam engines being installed on the second floor. So, the old flooring was removed and replaced with a new heavy one supported by strong girders and columns. This robust construction, which is more common today and somewhat similar to the metal support structure of the Manhattan Elevated train, was built separately from the outer walls and took up the full width of 257 Pearl Street and about three-quarters of its depth. This change inside didn’t improve the building's unattractive exterior, which did little to suggest the grand and ornate stations later built by the New York Edison Company, which now occupy entire city blocks.
Of this episode Edison gives the following account: "While planning for my first New York station—Pearl Street—of course, I had no real estate, and from lack of experience had very little knowledge of its cost in New York; so I assumed a rather large, liberal amount of it to plan my station on. It occurred to me one day that before I went too far with my plans I had better find out what real estate was worth. In my original plan I had 200 by 200 feet. I thought that by going down on a slum street near the water-front I would get some pretty cheap property. So I picked out the worst dilapidated street there was, and found I could only get two buildings, each 25 feet front, one 100 feet deep and the other 85 feet deep. I thought about $10,000 each would cover it; but when I got the price I found that they wanted $75,000 for one and $80,000 for the other. Then I was compelled to change my plans and go upward in the air where real estate was cheap. I cleared out the building entirely to the walls and built my station of structural ironwork, running it up high."
Of this episode, Edison gives the following account: "When I was planning my first New York station—Pearl Street—I didn’t own any real estate and, due to my lack of experience, I had very little idea of what property costs in New York. So I estimated a rather high, generous amount to plan my station. One day it struck me that before I went too far with my plans, I should find out the actual value of real estate. In my original plan, I had 200 by 200 feet. I figured that by going down to a run-down street near the waterfront, I could get some pretty cheap property. So I chose the worst dilapidated street I could find, and discovered I could only acquire two buildings, each 25 feet wide, one 100 feet deep and the other 85 feet deep. I thought about $10,000 each would cover it; but when I got the price, I learned they wanted $75,000 for one and $80,000 for the other. I then had to change my plans and go upward where real estate was cheaper. I cleared out the building completely to the walls and constructed my station with structural ironwork, building it up high."
Into this converted structure was put the most complete steam plant obtainable, together with all the mechanical and engineering adjuncts bearing upon economical and successful operation. Being in a narrow street and a congested district, the plant needed special facilities for the handling of coal and ashes, as well as for ventilation and forced draught. All of these details received Mr. Edison's personal care and consideration on the spot, in addition to the multitude of other affairs demanding his thought. Although not a steam or mechanical engineer, his quick grasp of principles and omnivorous reading had soon supplied the lack of training; nor had he forgotten the practical experience picked up as a boy on the locomotives of the Grand Trunk road. It is to be noticed as a feature of the plant, in common with many of later construction, that it was placed well away from the water's edge, and equipped with non-condensing engines; whereas the modern plant invariably seeks the bank of a river or lake for the purpose of a generous supply of water for its condensing engines or steam-turbines. These are among the refinements of practice coincidental with the advance of the art.
The most comprehensive steam plant available was installed in this renovated building, along with all the mechanical and engineering components necessary for efficient and successful operation. Since it was located on a narrow street in a crowded area, the plant required special facilities for handling coal and ashes, as well as for ventilation and forced draft. Mr. Edison personally oversaw all these details, despite his busy schedule filled with other responsibilities. Even though he wasn't a trained steam or mechanical engineer, his quick understanding of concepts and extensive reading made up for his lack of formal training, and he didn't forget the hands-on experience he gained as a boy on the locomotives of the Grand Trunk road. It's notable that, like many later plants, this one was situated well away from the water's edge and was equipped with non-condensing engines; in contrast, modern plants typically seek locations by a river or lake to ensure a sufficient water supply for their condensing engines or steam turbines. These details reflect the advancements in practice that come with the evolution of the technology.
At the award of the John Fritz gold medal in April, 1909, to Charles T. Porter for his work in advancing the knowledge of steam-engineering, and for improvements in engine construction, Mr. Frank J. Sprague spoke on behalf of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers of the debt of electricity to the high-speed steam-engine. He recalled the fact that at the French Exposition of 1867 Mr. Porter installed two Porter-Allen engines to drive electric alternating-current generators for supplying current to primitive lighthouse apparatus. While the engines were not directly coupled to the dynamos, it was a curious fact that the piston speeds and number of revolutions were what is common to-day in isolated direct-coupled plants. In the dozen years following Mr. Porter built many engines with certain common characteristics—i.e., high piston speed and revolutions, solid engine bed, and babbitt-metal bearings; but there was no electric driving until 1880, when Mr. Porter installed a high-speed engine for Edison at his laboratory in Menlo Park. Shortly after this he was invited to construct for the Edison Pearl Street station the first of a series of engines for so-called "steam-dynamos," each independently driven by a direct-coupled engine. Mr. Sprague compared the relations thus established between electricity and the high-speed engine not to those of debtor and creditor, but rather to those of partners—an industrial marriage—one of the most important in the engineering world. Here were two machines destined to be joined together, economizing space, enhancing economy, augmenting capacity, reducing investment, and increasing dividends.
At the award ceremony for the John Fritz gold medal in April 1909, Charles T. Porter was recognized for his contributions to steam engineering and improvements in engine construction. Mr. Frank J. Sprague spoke on behalf of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers about how electricity owes much to the high-speed steam engine. He reminded everyone that at the French Exposition of 1867, Mr. Porter set up two Porter-Allen engines to power electric alternating-current generators that supplied electricity to basic lighthouse equipment. Although the engines weren't directly connected to the generators, it was interesting to note that the piston speeds and revolutions were similar to what we see today in standalone direct-coupled systems. In the dozen years that followed, Mr. Porter built many engines featuring high piston speeds, high revolutions, sturdy engine beds, and babbitt-metal bearings; however, electric driving didn't begin until 1880, when Mr. Porter installed a high-speed engine for Edison at his Menlo Park laboratory. Shortly after, he was asked to build the first of several engines for the Edison Pearl Street station, known as “steam-dynamos,” each driven by a direct-coupled engine. Mr. Sprague likened the relationship between electricity and the high-speed engine to that of partners in an industrial partnership—a crucial collaboration in the engineering field. These two machines were meant to work together to save space, improve efficiency, increase capacity, reduce investment costs, and boost profits.
While rapid progress was being made in this and other directions, the wheels of industry were humming merrily at the Edison Tube Works, for over fifteen miles of tube conductors were required for the district, besides the boxes to connect the network at the street intersections, and the hundreds of junction boxes for taking the service conductors into each of the hundreds of buildings. In addition to the immense amount of money involved, this specialized industry required an enormous amount of experiment, as it called for the development of an entirely new art. But with Edison's inventive fertility—if ever there was a cross-fertilizer of mechanical ideas it is he—and with Mr. Kruesi's never-failing patience and perseverance applied to experiment and evolution, rapid progress was made. A franchise having been obtained from the city, the work of laying the underground conductors began in the late fall of 1881, and was pushed with almost frantic energy. It is not to be supposed, however, that the Edison tube system had then reached a finality of perfection in the eyes of its inventor. In his correspondence with Kruesi, as late as 1887, we find Edison bewailing the inadequacy of the insulation of the conductors under twelve hundred volts pressure, as for example: "Dear Kruesi,—There is nothing wrong with your present compound. It is splendid. The whole trouble is air-bubbles. The hotter it is poured the greater the amount of air-bubbles. At 212 it can be put on rods and there is no bubble. I have a man experimenting and testing all the time. Until I get at the proper method of pouring and getting rid of the air-bubbles, it will be waste of time to experiment with other asphalts. Resin oil distils off easily. It may answer, but paraffine or other similar substances must be put in to prevent brittleness, One thing is certain, and that is, everything must be poured in layers, not only the boxes, but the tubes. The tube itself should have a thin coating. The rope should also have a coating. The rods also. The whole lot, rods and rope, when ready for tube, should have another coat, and then be placed in tube and filled. This will do the business." Broad and large as a continent in his ideas, if ever there was a man of finical fussiness in attention to detail, it is Edison. A letter of seven pages of about the same date in 1887 expatiates on the vicious troubles caused by the air-bubble, and remarks with fine insight into the problems of insulation and the idea of layers of it: "Thus you have three separate coatings, and it is impossible an air-hole in one should match the other."
While rapid progress was being made in this and other areas, the industry was buzzing at the Edison Tube Works, as over fifteen miles of tube conductors were needed for the district, along with the boxes to connect the network at street intersections and the hundreds of junction boxes to lead service conductors into each of the many buildings. Besides the significant amount of money involved, this specialized industry demanded extensive experimentation, as it required the creation of an entirely new field. But with Edison’s knack for invention—he truly was a catalyst for mechanical ideas—and with Mr. Kruesi’s unwavering patience and dedication to experimentation and development, progress moved quickly. After securing a franchise from the city, the work on laying the underground conductors began in late fall 1881 and was executed with nearly frantic energy. However, it shouldn't be assumed that the Edison tube system had achieved perfection in the eyes of its creator. In his correspondence with Kruesi, as late as 1887, Edison lamented the shortcomings of the insulation of the conductors under twelve hundred volts pressure, saying, "Dear Kruesi,—There is nothing wrong with your current compound. It's great. The whole issue is air-bubbles. The hotter it is poured, the more air-bubbles appear. At 212 degrees, it can be applied to rods without bubbles. I have someone constantly experimenting and testing. Until I figure out the right method of pouring and eliminating the air-bubbles, experimenting with other asphalts is a waste of time. Resin oil distills off easily. It might work, but paraffin or similar materials need to be added to prevent brittleness. One thing is clear: everything must be poured in layers, not just the boxes but also the tubes. The tube itself should have a thin coating. The rope should also be coated. The rods too. Once ready for the tube, everything—rods and rope—should get another coat, and then be placed in the tube and filled. This will work." As broad-minded as he was with ideas, Edison was also detail-oriented and meticulous. A seven-page letter from around the same time in 1887 elaborates on the problems caused by air-bubbles and insightfully discusses insulation issues and the layers involved: "So you have three separate coatings, and it’s impossible for an air-hole in one to align with the others."
To a man less thorough and empirical in method than Edison, it would have been sufficient to have made his plans clear to associates or subordinates and hold them responsible for accurate results. No such vicarious treatment would suit him, ready as he has always been to share the work where he could give his trust. In fact he realized, as no one else did at this stage, the tremendous import of this novel and comprehensive scheme for giving the world light; and he would not let go, even if busy to the breaking-point. Though plunged in a veritable maelstrom of new and important business interests, and though applying for no fewer than eighty-nine patents in 1881, all of which were granted, he superintended on the spot all this laying of underground conductors for the first district. Nor did he merely stand around and give orders. Day and night he actually worked in the trenches with the laborers, amid the dirt and paving-stones and hurry-burly of traffic, helping to lay the tubes, filling up junction-boxes, and taking part in all the infinite detail. He wanted to know for himself how things went, why for some occult reason a little change was necessary, what improvement could be made in the material. His hours of work were not regulated by the clock, but lasted until he felt the need of a little rest. Then he would go off to the station building in Pearl Street, throw an overcoat on a pile of tubes, lie down and sleep for a few hours, rising to resume work with the first gang. There was a small bedroom on the third floor of the station available for him, but going to bed meant delay and consumed time. It is no wonder that such impatience, such an enthusiasm, drove the work forward at a headlong pace.
For someone less thorough and hands-on like Edison, it would have been enough to clearly outline plans to coworkers or subordinates and hold them accountable for accurate results. He wasn’t interested in that kind of indirect approach; he was always ready to pitch in where he trusted others. In fact, he understood better than anyone else at this point just how significant this innovative and extensive plan for providing light to the world was, and he wasn’t about to step back, even when overwhelmed. Despite being caught up in a whirlwind of new and important business ventures and filing for no less than eighty-nine patents in 1881—most of which were granted—he directly supervised the installation of underground cables for the first district. He didn’t just stand aside giving orders; he actively worked in the trenches alongside the laborers, dealing with the mess of dirt and paving stones and the chaos of traffic, helping to lay down tubes, fill junction boxes, and engage in all the countless details. He wanted to see for himself how things were going, why some minor adjustments were needed, and what improvements could be made to the materials. His work hours weren’t set by a schedule; he worked until he needed a little break. Then he’d head over to the station building on Pearl Street, toss an overcoat on a stack of tubes, lie down, and catch a few hours of sleep before rising to get back to work with the first crew. There was a small bedroom on the third floor available to him, but going to bed meant wasting time. It’s no wonder that such impatience and enthusiasm pushed the work forward at a rapid pace.
Edison says of this period: "When we put down the tubes in the lower part of New York, in the streets, we kept a big stock of them in the cellar of the station at Pearl Street. As I was on all the time, I would take a nap of an hour or so in the daytime—any time—and I used to sleep on those tubes in the cellar. I had two Germans who were testing there, and both of them died of diphtheria, caught in the cellar, which was cold and damp. It never affected me."
Edison talks about this time: "When we laid the tubes in the lower part of New York, in the streets, we kept a large supply of them in the station's basement on Pearl Street. Since I was always on duty, I would take a nap for an hour or so during the day—whenever I could—and I used to sleep on those tubes in the basement. I had two German workers doing tests there, and both of them died from diphtheria, caught in the cold and damp basement. I was never affected."
It is worth pausing just a moment to glance at this man taking a fitful rest on a pile of iron pipe in a dingy building. His name is on the tip of the world's tongue. Distinguished scientists from every part of Europe seek him eagerly. He has just been decorated and awarded high honors by the French Government. He is the inventor of wonderful new apparatus, and the exploiter of novel and successful arts. The magic of his achievements and the rumors of what is being done have caused a wild drop in gas securities, and a sensational rise in his own electric-light stock from $100 to $3500 a share. Yet these things do not at all affect his slumber or his democratic simplicity, for in that, as in everything else, he is attending strictly to business, "doing the thing that is next to him."
It’s worth taking a moment to look at this man resting fitfully on a pile of iron pipes in a rundown building. His name is on everyone’s lips. Distinguished scientists from all over Europe are eager to meet him. He has just been honored with high awards from the French Government. He’s the inventor of amazing new devices and is successfully implementing innovative methods. The excitement of his achievements and the buzz around his work have caused a dramatic drop in gas stock prices and a sensational rise in his electric-light stock from $100 to $3500 a share. Yet none of this affects his sleep or his down-to-earth nature because, in everything he does, he remains focused on the task at hand, "doing what’s right in front of him."
Part of the rush and feverish haste was due to the approach of frost, which, as usual in New York, suspended operations in the earth; but the laying of the conductors was resumed promptly in the spring of 1882; and meantime other work had been advanced. During the fall and winter months two more "Jumbo" dynamos were built and sent to London, after which the construction of six for New York was swiftly taken in hand. In the month of May three of these machines, each with a capacity of twelve hundred incandescent lamps, were delivered at Pearl Street and assembled on the second floor. On July 5th—owing to the better opportunity for ceaseless toil given by a public holiday—the construction of the operative part of the station was so far completed that the first of the dynamos was operated under steam; so that three days later the satisfactory experiment was made of throwing its flood of electrical energy into a bank of one thousand lamps on an upper floor. Other tests followed in due course. All was excitement. The field-regulating apparatus and the electrical-pressure indicator—first of its kind—were also tested, and in turn found satisfactory. Another vital test was made at this time—namely, of the strength of the iron structure itself on which the plant was erected. This was done by two structural experts; and not till he got their report as to ample factors of safety was Edison reassured as to this detail.
Part of the urgency and frantic pace was due to the impending frost, which, as usual in New York, halted outdoor work. However, the installation of the conductors resumed promptly in the spring of 1882, and in the meantime, other projects made progress. During the fall and winter months, two more "Jumbo" dynamos were built and sent to London, after which the construction of six for New York quickly began. In May, three of these machines, each capable of powering twelve hundred incandescent lamps, were delivered to Pearl Street and set up on the second floor. On July 5th—thanks to the opportunity for uninterrupted work provided by a public holiday—the construction of the operational part of the station reached a point where the first of the dynamos was run on steam. Three days later, a successful test was conducted, sending its surge of electrical energy into a bank of one thousand lamps on an upper floor. Additional tests followed as expected. There was a lot of excitement. The field-regulating apparatus and the electrical-pressure indicator—the first of its kind—were also tested and found satisfactory. Another crucial test was carried out at this time to check the strength of the iron structure that supported the plant. This was performed by two structural experts, and only after receiving their report confirming sufficient safety factors did Edison feel reassured about this aspect.
A remark of Edison, familiar to all who have worked with him, when it is reported to him that something new goes all right and is satisfactory from all points of view, is: "Well, boys, now let's find the bugs," and the hunt for the phylloxera begins with fiendish, remorseless zest. Before starting the plant for regular commercial service, he began personally a series of practical experiments and tests to ascertain in advance what difficulties would actually arise in practice, so that he could provide remedies or preventives. He had several cots placed in the adjoining building, and he and a few of his most strenuous assistants worked day and night, leaving the work only for hurried meals and a snatch of sleep. These crucial tests, aiming virtually to break the plant down if possible within predetermined conditions, lasted several weeks, and while most valuable in the information they afforded, did not hinder anything, for meantime customers' premises throughout the district were being wired and supplied with lamps and meters.
A common saying of Edison's, known to everyone who worked with him, when he hears that something new is functioning well and is satisfactory in every way, is: "Well, guys, now let's find the problems," and the search for issues begins with intense, relentless enthusiasm. Before launching the plant for regular commercial use, he personally initiated a series of practical experiments and tests to figure out in advance what challenges would actually arise in practice, so that he could come up with solutions or preventative measures. He had several cots set up in the nearby building, and he and a few of his most dedicated assistants worked day and night, only taking breaks for quick meals and brief naps. These essential tests, aimed at almost breaking down the plant under specific conditions, went on for several weeks, and while they provided extremely valuable information, they didn’t slow anything down, as in the meantime, customers' properties in the area were being wired and supplied with lamps and meters.
On Monday, September 4, 1882, at 3 o'clock, P.M., Edison realized the consummation of his broad and original scheme. The Pearl Street station was officially started by admitting steam to the engine of one of the "Jumbos," current was generated, turned into the network of underground conductors, and was transformed into light by the incandescent lamps that had thus far been installed. This date and event may properly be regarded as historical, for they mark the practical beginning of a new art, which in the intervening years has grown prodigiously, and is still increasing by leaps and bounds.
On Monday, September 4, 1882, at 3:00 PM, Edison achieved the culmination of his ambitious and innovative plan. The Pearl Street station officially kicked off by starting the steam engine of one of the "Jumbos," generating electricity that flowed through the underground network of conductors and was converted into light by the incandescent bulbs that had been installed up to that point. This date and event can rightly be seen as historical, as they signify the practical start of a new art form that has expanded tremendously over the years and continues to grow rapidly.
Everything worked satisfactorily in the main. There were a few mechanical and engineering annoyances that might naturally be expected to arise in a new and unprecedented enterprise; but nothing of sufficient moment to interfere with the steady and continuous supply of current to customers at all hours of the day and night. Indeed, once started, this station was operated uninterruptedly for eight years with only insignificant stoppage.
Everything mostly went smoothly. There were a few mechanical and engineering issues that you’d expect in a new and groundbreaking venture, but nothing serious enough to disrupt the constant supply of power to customers at all times. In fact, once it was up and running, this station operated continuously for eight years with only minor interruptions.
It will have been noted by the reader that there was nothing to indicate rashness in starting up the station, as only one dynamo was put in operation. Within a short time, however, it was deemed desirable to supply the underground network with more current, as many additional customers had been connected and the demand for the new light was increasing very rapidly. Although Edison had successfully operated several dynamos in multiple arc two years before—i.e., all feeding current together into the same circuits—there was not, at this early period of experience, any absolute certainty as to what particular results might occur upon the throwing of the current from two or more such massive dynamos into a great distributing system. The sequel showed the value of Edison's cautious method in starting the station by operating only a single unit at first.
The reader may have noticed that there was nothing to suggest it was reckless to start up the station since only one dynamo was in operation. However, it quickly became necessary to provide the underground network with more electricity because many new customers were connected and the demand for the new light was skyrocketing. Even though Edison had successfully run several dynamos in multiple arc setups two years earlier—meaning they all supplied current together into the same circuits—there was no certainty at this early stage about what specific results might happen when the current from two or more large dynamos was fed into a large distribution system. The outcome demonstrated the value of Edison's cautious approach in launching the station by initially operating only a single unit.
He decided that it would be wise to make the trial operation of a second "Jumbo" on a Sunday, when business houses were closed in the district, thus obviating any danger of false impressions in the public mind in the event of any extraordinary manifestations. The circumstances attending the adding of a second dynamo are thus humorously described by Edison: "My heart was in my mouth at first, but everything worked all right.... Then we started another engine and threw them in parallel. Of all the circuses since Adam was born, we had the worst then! One engine would stop, and the other would run up to about a thousand revolutions, and then they would see-saw. The trouble was with the governors. When the circus commenced, the gang that was standing around ran out precipitately, and I guess some of them kept running for a block or two. I grabbed the throttle of one engine, and E. H. Johnson, who was the only one present to keep his wits, caught hold of the other, and we shut them off." One of the "gang" that ran, but, in this case, only to the end of the room, afterward said: "At the time it was a terrifying experience, as I didn't know what was going to happen. The engines and dynamos made a horrible racket, from loud and deep groans to a hideous shriek, and the place seemed to be filled with sparks and flames of all colors. It was as if the gates of the infernal regions had been suddenly opened."
He thought it would be smart to test a second "Jumbo" on a Sunday, when the businesses in the area were closed, to avoid any misunderstandings or panic if something unusual happened. Edison humorously described the chaos of adding a second dynamo: "At first, I was really nervous, but everything worked out fine.... Then we started another engine and connected them in parallel. Of all the craziness since the beginning of time, that was the worst! One engine would stop while the other surged to about a thousand revolutions, and then they would oscillate back and forth. The issue was with the governors. When the chaos started, the group standing around took off running, and I think some of them kept going for a block or two. I took control of one engine, and E. H. Johnson, the only one staying calm, took hold of the other, and we managed to shut them down." One of the group who ran off, but only to the end of the room, later said: "At the time, it was really scary because I had no idea what was going to happen. The engines and dynamos made a terrible noise, from loud and deep groans to a horrible scream, and the place seemed to be filled with sparks and flames of every color. It felt like the gates of hell had been thrown open."
This trouble was at once attacked by Edison in his characteristic and strenuous way. The above experiment took place between three and four o'clock on a Sunday afternoon, and within a few hours he had gathered his superintendent and men of the machine-works and had them at work on a shafting device that he thought would remedy the trouble. He says: "Of course, I discovered that what had happened was that one set was running the other as a motor. I then put up a long shaft, connecting all the governors together, and thought this would certainly cure the trouble; but it didn't. The torsion of the shaft was so great that one governor still managed to get ahead of the others. Well, it was a serious state of things, and I worried over it a lot. Finally I went down to Goerck Street and got a piece of shafting and a tube in which it fitted. I twisted the shafting one way and the tube the other as far as I could, and pinned them together. In this way, by straining the whole outfit up to its elastic limit in opposite directions, the torsion was practically eliminated, and after that the governors ran together all right."
Edison jumped right into solving the problem in his usual intense manner. The experiment happened between three and four o'clock on a Sunday afternoon, and within a few hours, he gathered his supervisor and the machine shop crew to work on a shafting device that he believed would fix the issue. He explained, "I found that one set was driving the other as a motor. I then installed a long shaft to connect all the governors, thinking this would definitely solve the problem; but it didn’t. The twisting of the shaft was so severe that one governor still managed to outpace the others. It was a serious situation, and it stressed me out a lot. Eventually, I went down to Goerck Street and picked up a piece of shafting and a fitting tube. I twisted the shaft one way and the tube the other as far as I could and secured them together. By stretching the entire setup to its elastic limit in opposite directions, the twisting was nearly eliminated, and after that, the governors ran smoothly together."
Edison realized, however, that in commercial practice this was only a temporary expedient, and that a satisfactory permanence of results could only be attained with more perfect engines that could be depended upon for close and simple regulation. The engines that were made part of the first three "Jumbos" placed in the station were the very best that could be obtained at the time, and even then had been specially designed and built for the purpose. Once more quoting Edison on this subject: "About that time" (when he was trying to run several dynamos in parallel in the Pearl Street station) "I got hold of Gardiner C. Sims, and he undertook to build an engine to run at three hundred and fifty revolutions and give one hundred and seventy-five horse-power. He went back to Providence and set to work, and brought the engine back with him to the shop. It worked only a few minutes when it busted. That man sat around that shop and slept in it for three weeks, until he got his engine right and made it work the way he wanted it to. When he reached this period I gave orders for the engine-works to run night and day until we got enough engines, and when all was ready we started the engines. Then everything worked all right.... One of these engines that Sims built ran twenty-four hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five days in the year, for over a year before it stopped." [12]
Edison realized, however, that in commercial practice this was only a temporary solution and that a reliable, lasting performance could only be achieved with more advanced engines that could provide accurate and straightforward regulation. The engines that were included in the first three "Jumbos" installed at the station were the best available at the time, and even then, they had been specially designed and built for this purpose. Quoting Edison again on this subject: "Around that time" (when he was attempting to run several dynamos in parallel at the Pearl Street station) "I got in touch with Gardiner C. Sims, and he agreed to build an engine that could run at three hundred and fifty revolutions and deliver one hundred and seventy-five horsepower. He went back to Providence and got to work, then brought the engine back to the shop. It only ran for a few minutes before it broke down. That guy hung around the shop and even slept there for three weeks until he fixed his engine and got it working the way he wanted. Once he reached that point, I ordered the engine shop to run day and night until we had enough engines, and when everything was ready, we started the engines. Then everything worked fine.... One of those engines that Sims built ran twenty-four hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five days a year, for more than a year before it finally stopped." [12]
[Footnote 12: We quote the following interesting notes of Mr. Charles L. Clarke on the question of see-sawing, or "hunting," as it was afterward termed:
[Footnote 12: We quote the following interesting notes of Mr. Charles L. Clarke on the question of see-sawing, or "hunting," as it was afterward termed:
"In the Holborn Viaduct station the difficulty of 'hunting' was not experienced. At the time the 'Jumbos' were first operated in multiple arc, April 8, 1882, one machine was driven by a Porter-Allen engine, and the other by an Armington & Sims engine, and both machines were on a solid foundation. At the station at Milan, Italy, the first 'Jumbos' operated in multiple arc were driven by Porter-Allen engines, and dash-pots were applied to the governors. These machines were also upon a solid foundation, and no trouble was experienced.
At the Holborn Viaduct station, they didn't have any issues with 'hunting.' When the 'Jumbos' first ran in multiple arcs on April 8, 1882, one machine was powered by a Porter-Allen engine and the other by an Armington & Sims engine, both sitting on a solid foundation. At the station in Milan, Italy, the first 'Jumbos' used in multiple arcs were also powered by Porter-Allen engines, and dash-pots were installed on the governors. These machines were likewise on a solid foundation, and everything went smoothly.
"At the Pearl Street station, however, the machines were supported upon long iron floor-beams, and at the high speed of 350 revolutions per minute, considerable vertical vibration was given to the engines. And the writer is inclined to the opinion that this vibration, acting in the same direction as the action of gravitation, which was one of the two controlling forces in the operation of the Porter-Allen governor, was the primary cause of the 'hunting.' In the Armington & Sims engine the controlling forces in the operation of the governor were the centrifugal force of revolving weights, and the opposing force of compressed springs, and neither the action of gravitation nor the vertical vibrations of the engine could have any sensible effect upon the governor."]
"At the Pearl Street station, the machines were mounted on long iron floor beams, and at the high speed of 350 revolutions per minute, there was significant vertical vibration in the engines. I believe this vibration, acting in the same direction as gravity—which was one of the two main forces in the operation of the Porter-Allen governor—was the main cause of the 'hunting.' In the Armington & Sims engine, the forces controlling the governor were the centrifugal force from the revolving weights and the opposing force from compressed springs, so neither gravity nor the vertical vibrations of the engine could have any noticeable impact on the governor."
The Pearl Street station, as this first large plant was called, made rapid and continuous growth in its output of electric current. It started, as we have said, on September 4, 1882, supplying about four hundred lights to a comparatively small number of customers. Among those first supplied was the banking firm of Drexel, Morgan & Company, corner of Broad and Wall streets, at the outermost limits of the system. Before the end of December of the same year the light had so grown in favor that it was being supplied to over two hundred and forty customers whose buildings were wired for over five thousand lamps. By this time three more "Jumbos" had been added to the plant. The output from this time forward increased steadily up to the spring of 1884, when the demands of the station necessitated the installation of two additional "Jumbos" in the adjoining building, which, with the venous improvements that had been made in the mean time, gave the station a capacity of over eleven thousand lamps actually in service at any one time.
The Pearl Street station, as this first large facility was known, quickly and consistently increased its production of electric power. It began, as mentioned earlier, on September 4, 1882, providing about four hundred lights to a relatively small number of customers. Among the first clients was the banking firm of Drexel, Morgan & Company, located at the corner of Broad and Wall streets, at the edge of the system. By the end of December that same year, the popularity of electric light had grown so much that it was being provided to over two hundred and forty customers whose buildings were wired for more than five thousand lamps. By this point, three more "Jumbos" had been added to the facility. From then on, the output steadily increased until the spring of 1884, when the station's demands required the installation of two additional "Jumbos" in the neighboring building, which, along with the various improvements made in the meantime, allowed the station to support over eleven thousand lamps actually in use at any given moment.
During the first three months of operating the Pearl Street station light was supplied to customers without charge. Edison had perfect confidence in his meters, and also in the ultimate judgment of the public as to the superiority of the incandescent electric light as against other illuminants. He realized, however, that in the beginning of the operation of an entirely novel plant there was ample opportunity for unexpected contingencies, although the greatest care had been exercised to make everything as perfect as possible. Mechanical defects or other unforeseen troubles in any part of the plant or underground system might arise and cause temporary stoppages of operation, thus giving grounds for uncertainty which would create a feeling of public distrust in the permanence of the supply of light.
During the first three months of running the Pearl Street station, light was provided to customers for free. Edison had complete faith in his meters and also in the public's eventual judgment regarding the superiority of incandescent electric light over other light sources. However, he understood that at the start of a completely new facility, there were plenty of opportunities for unexpected issues, even though every effort had been made to ensure everything was as perfect as possible. Mechanical failures or other unforeseen problems in any part of the plant or underground system could occur and lead to temporary shutdowns, creating uncertainty that might foster public mistrust in the reliability of the light supply.
As to the kind of mishap that was wont to occur, Edison tells the following story: "One afternoon, after our Pearl Street station started, a policeman rushed in and told us to send an electrician at once up to the corner of Ann and Nassau streets—some trouble. Another man and I went up. We found an immense crowd of men and boys there and in the adjoining streets—a perfect jam. There was a leak in one of our junction-boxes, and on account of the cellars extending under the street, the top soil had become insulated. Hence, by means of this leak powerful currents were passing through this thin layer of moist earth. When a horse went to pass over it he would get a very severe shock. When I arrived I saw coming along the street a ragman with a dilapidated old horse, and one of the boys told him to go over on the other side of the road—which was the place where the current leaked. When the ragman heard this he took that side at once. The moment the horse struck the electrified soil he stood straight up in the air, and then reared again; and the crowd yelled, the policeman yelled; and the horse started to run away. This continued until the crowd got so serious that the policeman had to clear it out; and we were notified to cut the current off. We got a gang of men, cut the current off for several junction-boxes, and fixed the leak. One man who had seen it came to me next day and wanted me to put in apparatus for him at a place where they sold horses. He said he could make a fortune with it, because he could get old nags in there and make them act like thoroughbreds."
Regarding the kind of mishap that used to happen, Edison shares this story: "One afternoon, after our Pearl Street station opened, a policeman rushed in and told us to send an electrician right away to the corner of Ann and Nassau streets—there was some trouble. Another guy and I went up. We found a huge crowd of men and boys there and in the nearby streets—a complete jam. There was a leak in one of our junction boxes, and because of the cellars extending under the street, the topsoil had become insulated. As a result, powerful currents were flowing through this thin layer of moist earth. When a horse tried to walk over it, it would get a really strong shock. When I arrived, I saw a ragman with a beat-up old horse coming down the street, and one of the boys told him to go over to the other side of the road—which was where the current leaked. When the ragman heard this, he went right over there. The moment the horse stepped onto the electrified soil, it jumped straight up in the air, then reared again; and the crowd yelled, the policeman shouted; and the horse started running away. This went on until the crowd became so rowdy that the policeman had to disperse them; and we were told to cut the current off. We gathered a crew, cut the current for several junction boxes, and fixed the leak. The next day, a man who had witnessed it came to me and wanted me to install equipment for him at a place where they sold horses. He said he could make a fortune with it, because he could get old nags in there and make them act like thoroughbreds."
So well had the work been planned and executed, however, that nothing happened to hinder the continuous working of the station and the supply of light to customers. Hence it was decided in December, 1882, to begin charging a price for the service, and, accordingly, Edison electrolytic meters were installed on the premises of each customer then connected. The first bill for lighting, based upon the reading of one of these meters, amounted to $50.40, and was collected on January 18, 1883, from the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company, 17 and 19 Cliff Street. Generally speaking, customers found that their bills compared fairly with gas bills for corresponding months where the same amount of light was used, and they paid promptly and cheerfully, with emphatic encomiums of the new light. During November, 1883, a little over one year after the station was started, bills for lighting amounting to over $9000 were collected.
The work was planned and executed so well that nothing disrupted the continuous operation of the station and the supply of light to customers. As a result, in December 1882, it was decided to start charging for the service, and Edison electrolytic meters were installed at each customer's location. The first lighting bill, based on the reading of one of these meters, was $50.40, collected on January 18, 1883, from the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company at 17 and 19 Cliff Street. Generally, customers found that their bills were comparable to gas bills for the same period when equivalent amounts of light were used, and they paid quickly and happily, expressing high praise for the new light. By November 1883, just over a year after the station began, lighting bills totaling over $9000 were collected.
An interesting story of meter experience in the first few months of operation of the Pearl Street station is told by one of the "boys" who was then in position to know the facts; "Mr. J. P. Morgan, whose firm was one of the first customers, expressed to Mr. Edison some doubt as to the accuracy of the meter. The latter, firmly convinced of its correctness, suggested a strict test by having some cards printed and hung on each fixture at Mr. Morgan's place. On these cards was to be noted the number of lamps in the fixture, and the time they were turned on and off each day for a month. At the end of that time the lamp-hours were to be added together by one of the clerks and figured on a basis of a definite amount per lamp-hour, and compared with the bill that would be rendered by the station for the corresponding period. The results of the first month's test showed an apparent overcharge by the Edison company. Mr. Morgan was exultant, while Mr. Edison was still confident and suggested a continuation of the test. Another month's trial showed somewhat similar results. Mr. Edison was a little disturbed, but insisted that there was a mistake somewhere. He went down to Drexel, Morgan & Company's office to investigate, and, after looking around, asked when the office was cleaned out. He was told it was done at night by the janitor, who was sent for, and upon being interrogated as to what light he used, said that he turned on a central fixture containing about ten lights. It came out that he had made no record of the time these lights were in use. He was told to do so in future, and another month's test was made. On comparison with the company's bill, rendered on the meter-reading, the meter came within a few cents of the amount computed from the card records, and Mr. Morgan was completely satisfied of the accuracy of the meter."
An interesting story about meter experiences in the first few months of the Pearl Street station's operation comes from one of the "guys" who was in a position to know the details. "Mr. J. P. Morgan, whose firm was one of the first customers, expressed some doubts to Mr. Edison about the meter's accuracy. Edison, confident in its correctness, suggested a thorough test by printing cards and hanging them on each fixture at Mr. Morgan's location. These cards were meant to note the number of lamps in the fixture and the times they were turned on and off each day for a month. After that month, the lamp-hours would be totaled by one of the clerks and calculated based on a specific amount per lamp-hour, then compared with the bill the station would issue for the same period. The results from the first month's test indicated an apparent overcharge by the Edison company. Mr. Morgan was thrilled, while Mr. Edison remained confident and suggested continuing the test. Another month's trial showed similar results. Mr. Edison was a bit concerned but maintained that there was a mistake somewhere. He visited Drexel, Morgan & Company’s office to investigate and, after looking around, asked when the office was cleaned. He was told it was done at night by the janitor, who was called in, and when asked what light he used, he replied that he turned on a central fixture with about ten lights. It turned out he hadn’t been keeping track of how long those lights were on. He was instructed to do so in the future, leading to another month of testing. When comparing with the company’s bill based on the meter reading, the meter came within a few cents of the amount calculated from the card records, and Mr. Morgan was completely satisfied with the meter's accuracy."
It is a strange but not extraordinary commentary on the perversity of human nature and the lack of correct observation, to note that even after the Pearl Street station had been in actual operation twenty-four hours a day for nearly three months, there should still remain an attitude of "can't be done." That such a scepticism still obtained is evidenced by the public prints of the period. Edison's electric-light system and his broad claims were freely discussed and animadverted upon at the very time he was demonstrating their successful application. To show some of the feeling at the time, we reproduce the following letter, which appeared November 29, 1882:
It’s a strange but not unusual reflection on the quirks of human nature and our tendency to overlook reality that even after the Pearl Street station had been running continuously for nearly three months, there was still a belief that it “couldn’t be done.” This ongoing skepticism was evident in the newspapers of the time. Edison's electric-light system and his ambitious claims were openly debated and criticized even while he was proving their successful use. To illustrate the sentiment of that time, we present the following letter, which was published on November 29, 1882:
"To the Editor of the Sun:
"To the Editor of the Sun:"
"SIR,—In reading the discussions relative to the Pearl Street station of the Edison light, I have noted that while it is claimed that there is scarcely any loss from leakage of current, nothing is said about the loss due to the resistance of the long circuits. I am informed that this is the secret of the failure to produce with the power in position a sufficient amount of current to run all the lamps that have been put up, and that while six, and even seven, lights to the horse-power may be produced from an isolated plant, the resistance of the long underground wires reduces this result in the above case to less than three lights to the horse-power, thus making the cost of production greatly in excess of gas. Can the Edison company explain this? 'INVESTIGATOR'."
"SIR,—I've been reading the discussions about the Pearl Street station of the Edison light, and I noticed that while it’s claimed there’s hardly any loss from current leakage, there’s no mention of the losses due to the resistance of the long circuits. I’ve been told that this is the reason for the failure to produce enough current to power all the lamps that have been installed. While an isolated plant can produce six or even seven lights per horsepower, the resistance of the long underground wires reduces this to less than three lights per horsepower in this case, making the production cost much higher than gas. Can the Edison company clarify this? 'INVESTIGATOR'."
This was one of the many anonymous letters that had been written to the newspapers on the subject, and the following reply by the Edison company was printed December 3, 1882:
This was one of the many anonymous letters sent to the newspapers about the topic, and the Edison company's response was published on December 3, 1882:
"To the Editor of the Sun:
"To the Editor of the Sun:"
"SIR,—'Investigator' in Wednesday's Sun, says that the Edison company is troubled at its Pearl Street station with a 'loss of current, due to the resistance of the long circuits'; also that, whereas Edison gets 'six or even seven lights to the horse-power in isolated plants, the resistance of the long underground wires reduces that result in the Pearl Street station to less than three lights to the horse-power.' Both of these statements are false. As regards loss due to resistance, there is a well-known law for determining it, based on Ohm's law. By use of that law we knew in advance, that is to say, when the original plans for the station were drawn, just what this loss would be, precisely the same as a mechanical engineer when constructing a mill with long lines of shafting can forecast the loss of power due to friction. The practical result in the Pearl Street station has fully demonstrated the correctness of our estimate thus made in advance. As regards our getting only three lights per horse-power, our station has now been running three months, without stopping a moment, day or night, and we invariably get over six lamps per horse-power, or substantially the same as we do in our isolated plants. We are now lighting one hundred and ninety-three buildings, wired for forty-four hundred lamps, of which about two-thirds are in constant use, and we are adding additional houses and lamps daily. These figures can be verified at the office of the Board of Underwriters, where certificates with full details permitting the use of our light are filed by their own inspector. To light these lamps we run from one to three dynamos, according to the lamps in use at any given time, and we shall start additional dynamos as fast as we can connect more buildings. Neither as regards the loss due to resistance, nor as regards the number of lamps per horse-power, is there the slightest trouble or disappointment on the part of our company, and your correspondent is entirely in error is assuming that there is. Let me suggest that if 'Investigator' really wishes to investigate, and is competent and willing to learn the exact facts, he can do so at this office, where there is no mystery of concealment, but, on the contrary, a strong desire to communicate facts to intelligent inquirers. Such a method of investigating must certainly be more satisfactory to one honestly seeking knowledge than that of first assuming an error as the basis of a question, and then demanding an explanation.
SIR,—'Investigator' in Wednesday's Sun claims that the Edison company is facing issues at its Pearl Street station due to a 'loss of current, caused by the resistance of the long circuits'; also, that while Edison achieves 'six or even seven lights per horse-power in isolated plants, the resistance of the long underground wires cuts that down to less than three lights per horse-power at the Pearl Street station.' Both statements are incorrect. Regarding the loss from resistance, there's a well-known law for calculating it, based on Ohm's law. Because of that law, we anticipated this loss when we first drew up the original plans for the station, just like a mechanical engineer can predict the power loss from friction when designing a mill with long shafts. The actual results at the Pearl Street station have thoroughly confirmed our earlier estimates. As for getting only three lights per horse-power, our station has been operating continuously for three months, day and night, and we consistently achieve over six lamps per horse-power, which is about the same as in our isolated plants. We are currently lighting one hundred and ninety-three buildings, wired for four thousand four hundred lamps, two-thirds of which are constantly in use, and we are adding more houses and lamps daily. These figures can be verified at the office of the Board of Underwriters, where their inspector has filed certificates with complete details allowing the use of our lighting. To power these lamps, we operate one to three dynamos, depending on the number of lamps in use at any time, and we will start more dynamos as we connect more buildings. There is no issue or disappointment for our company regarding the loss from resistance or the number of lamps per horse-power, and your correspondent is completely mistaken in assuming otherwise. I suggest that if 'Investigator' genuinely wants to investigate and is capable and willing to learn the facts, he can do so at this office, where there is no hidden agenda, but instead, a strong eagerness to share information with interested inquirers. Clearly, this approach to investigation would be far more satisfying for someone sincerely seeking knowledge than starting with an assumption of error as the basis for a question and then demanding an explanation.
"Yours very truly,
"Best regards,"
"S. B. EATON, President."
"S. B. EATON, President."
Viewed from the standpoint of over twenty-seven years later, the wisdom and necessity of answering anonymous newspaper letters of this kind might be deemed questionable, but it must be remembered that, although the Pearl Street station was working successfully, and Edison's comprehensive plans were abundantly vindicated, the enterprise was absolutely new and only just stepping on the very threshold of commercial exploitation. To enter in and possess the land required the confidence of capital and the general public. Hence it was necessary to maintain a constant vigilance to defeat the insidious attacks of carping critics and others who would attempt to injure the Edison system by misleading statements.
Looking back over twenty-seven years later, the wisdom and necessity of responding to anonymous newspaper letters like this might seem questionable, but it's important to remember that even though the Pearl Street station was operating successfully and Edison's detailed plans were clearly validated, the project was completely new and just beginning its commercial journey. To move forward and secure the land required the trust of investors and the general public. Therefore, it was essential to remain constantly vigilant to counter the sneaky attacks from critics and others who might try to harm the Edison system with misleading information.
It will be interesting to the modern electrician to note that when this pioneer station was started, and in fact for some little time afterward, there was not a single electrical instrument in the whole station—not a voltmeter or an ammeter! Nor was there a central switchboard! Each dynamo had its own individual control switch. The feeder connections were all at the front of the building, and the general voltage control apparatus was on the floor above. An automatic pressure indicator had been devised and put in connection with the main circuits. It consisted, generally speaking, of an electromagnet with relays connecting with a red and a blue lamp. When the electrical pressure was normal, neither lamp was lighted; but if the electromotive force rose above a predetermined amount by one or two volts, the red lamp lighted up, and the attendant at the hand-wheel of the field regulator inserted resistance in the field circuit, whereas, if the blue lamp lighted, resistance was cut out until the pressure was raised to normal. Later on this primitive indicator was supplanted by the "Bradley Bridge," a crude form of the "Howell" pressure indicators, which were subsequently used for many years in the Edison stations.
It will be interesting for today's electrician to note that when this pioneer station was started, and for some time afterward, there wasn't a single electrical instrument in the entire station—not a voltmeter or an ammeter! Nor was there a central switchboard! Each dynamo had its own individual control switch. The feeder connections were all at the front of the building, and the general voltage control equipment was on the floor above. An automatic pressure indicator had been designed and connected to the main circuits. Generally speaking, it consisted of an electromagnet with relays connected to a red and a blue lamp. When the electrical pressure was normal, neither lamp lit up; but if the electromotive force rose above a set amount by one or two volts, the red lamp lit up, and the operator at the hand-wheel of the field regulator added resistance in the field circuit, whereas if the blue lamp lit up, resistance was removed until the pressure returned to normal. Later on, this basic indicator was replaced by the "Bradley Bridge," a simplified version of the "Howell" pressure indicators, which were used for many years in the Edison stations.
Much could be added to make a complete pictorial description of the historic Pearl Street station, but it is not within the scope of this narrative to enter into diffuse technical details, interesting as they may be to many persons. We cannot close this chapter, however, without mention of the fate of the Pearl Street station, which continued in successful commercial operation until January 2, 1890, when it was partially destroyed by fire. All the "Jumbos" were ruined, excepting No. 9, which is still a venerated relic in the possession of the New York Edison Company. Luckily, the boilers were unharmed. Belt-driven generators and engines were speedily installed, and the station was again in operation in a few days. The uninjured "Jumbo," No. 9, again continued to perform its duty. But in the words of Mr. Charles L. Clarke, "the glory of the old Pearl Street station, unique in bearing the impress of Mr. Edison's personality, and, as it were, constructed with his own hands, disappeared in the flame and smoke of that Thursday morning fire."
A lot could be said to create a complete visual description of the historic Pearl Street station, but this narrative isn’t meant to go into detailed technical specifics, no matter how interesting they might be to some people. However, we can’t finish this chapter without mentioning what happened to the Pearl Street station, which successfully operated commercially until January 2, 1890, when it was partially destroyed by a fire. All the “Jumbos” were damaged, except for No. 9, which remains a treasured artifact in the possession of the New York Edison Company. Fortunately, the boilers survived. Belt-driven generators and engines were quickly put in place, and the station was back in operation within a few days. The undamaged “Jumbo,” No. 9, continued to carry out its duties. But as Mr. Charles L. Clarke put it, “the glory of the old Pearl Street station, uniquely reflecting Mr. Edison’s personality and, in a sense, built by his own hands, vanished in the flames and smoke of that Thursday morning fire.”
The few days' interruption of the service was the only serious one that has taken place in the history of the New York Edison Company from September 4, 1882, to the present date. The Pearl Street station was operated for some time subsequent to the fire, but increasing demands in the mean time having led to the construction of other stations, the mains of the First District were soon afterward connected to another plant, the Pearl Street station was dismantled, and the building was sold in 1895.
The brief disruption of service was the only significant one in the history of the New York Edison Company from September 4, 1882, to now. The Pearl Street station continued to operate for a while after the fire, but as demands grew, other stations were built. The mains of the First District were shortly connected to another plant, the Pearl Street station was taken apart, and the building was sold in 1895.
The prophetic insight into the magnitude of central-station lighting that Edison had when he was still experimenting on the incandescent lamp over thirty years ago is a little less than astounding, when it is so amply verified in the operations of the New York Edison Company (the successor of the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York) and many others. At the end of 1909 the New York Edison Company alone was operating twenty-eight stations and substations, having a total capacity of 159,500 kilowatts. Connected with its lines were approximately 85,000 customers wired for 3,813,899 incandescent lamps and nearly 225,000 horse-power through industrial electric motors connected with the underground service. A large quantity of electrical energy is also supplied for heating and cooking, charging automobiles, chemical and plating work, and various other uses.
The foresight Edison had about the scale of central-station lighting when he was still working on the incandescent lamp over thirty years ago is nothing short of impressive, especially considering how well it aligns with the operations of the New York Edison Company (the successor to the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York) and many others. By the end of 1909, the New York Edison Company was running twenty-eight stations and substations, with a total capacity of 159,500 kilowatts. Their lines were connected to around 85,000 customers who had 3,813,899 incandescent lamps wired, and nearly 225,000 horse-power for industrial electric motors linked to the underground service. A significant amount of electrical energy is also provided for heating, cooking, charging cars, chemical and plating work, and various other purposes.
CHAPTER XVII
OTHER EARLY STATIONS—THE METER
WE have now seen the Edison lighting system given a complete, convincing demonstration in Paris, London, and New York; and have noted steps taken for its introduction elsewhere on both sides of the Atlantic. The Paris plant, like that at the Crystal Palace, was a temporary exhibit. The London plant was less temporary, but not permanent, supplying before it was torn out no fewer than three thousand lamps in hotels, churches, stores, and dwellings in the vicinity of Holborn Viaduct. There Messrs. Johnson and Hammer put into practice many of the ideas now standard in the art, and secured much useful data for the work in New York, of which the story has just been told.
We’ve now seen the Edison lighting system successfully demonstrated in Paris, London, and New York, and we’ve observed steps taken to introduce it in other places on both sides of the Atlantic. The Paris plant, like the one at the Crystal Palace, was a temporary exhibit. The London plant was more permanent but not long-lasting, providing no fewer than three thousand lamps in hotels, churches, stores, and homes around Holborn Viaduct before it was removed. There, Messrs. Johnson and Hammer applied many of the ideas that are now standard in the field and gathered useful data for the work in New York, which has just been discussed.
As a matter of fact the first Edison commercial station to be operated in this country was that at Appleton, Wisconsin, but its only serious claim to notice is that it was the initial one of the system driven by water-power. It went into service August 15, 1882, about three weeks before the Pearl Street station. It consisted of one small dynamo of a capacity of two hundred and eighty lights of 10 c.p. each, and was housed in an unpretentious wooden shed. The dynamo-electric machine, though small, was robust, for under all the varying speeds of water-power, and the vicissitudes of the plant to which it, belonged, it continued in active use until 1899—seventeen years.
Actually, the first Edison commercial station to operate in this country was in Appleton, Wisconsin, but its only notable characteristic is that it was the first one powered by water. It started working on August 15, 1882, about three weeks before the Pearl Street station. It had one small dynamo that could handle two hundred and eighty 10-candlepower lights and was located in a simple wooden shed. Although it was small, the dynamo-electric machine was sturdy; despite the changing water power and the ups and downs of the plant it belonged to, it remained in active use until 1899—seventeen years.
Edison was from the first deeply impressed with the possibilities of water-power, and, as this incident shows, was prompt to seize such a very early opportunity. But his attention was in reality concentrated closely on the supply of great centres of population, a task which he then felt might well occupy his lifetime; and except in regard to furnishing isolated plants he did not pursue further the development of hydro-electric stations. That was left to others, and to the application of the alternating current, which has enabled engineers to harness remote powers, and, within thoroughly economical limits, transmit thousands of horse-power as much as two hundred miles at pressures of 80,000 and 100,000 volts. Owing to his insistence on low pressure, direct current for use in densely populated districts, as the only safe and truly universal, profitable way of delivering electrical energy to the consumers, Edison has been frequently spoken of as an opponent of the alternating current. This does him an injustice. At the time a measure was before the Virginia legislature, in 1890, to limit the permissible pressures of current so as to render it safe, he said: "You want to allow high pressure wherever the conditions are such that by no possible accident could that pressure get into the houses of the consumers; you want to give them all the latitude you can." In explaining this he added: "Suppose you want to take the falls down at Richmond, and want to put up a water-power? Why, if we erect a station at the falls, it is a great economy to get it up to the city. By digging a cheap trench and putting in an insulated cable, and connecting such station with the central part of Richmond, having the end of the cable come up into the station from the earth and there connected with motors, the power of the falls would be transmitted to these motors. If now the motors were made to run dynamos conveying low-pressure currents to the public, there is no possible way whereby this high-pressure current could get to the public." In other words, Edison made the sharp fundamental distinction between high pressure alternating current for transmission and low pressure direct current for distribution; and this is exactly the practice that has been adopted in all the great cities of the country to-day. There seems no good reason for believing that it will change. It might perhaps have been altogether better for Edison, from the financial standpoint, if he had not identified himself so completely with one kind of current, but that made no difference to him, as it was a matter of conviction; and Edison's convictions are granitic. Moreover, this controversy over the two currents, alternating and direct, which has become historical in the field of electricity—and is something like the "irrepressible conflict" we heard of years ago in national affairs—illustrates another aspect of Edison's character. Broad as the prairies and free in thought as the winds that sweep them, he is idiosyncratically opposed to loose and wasteful methods, to plans of empire that neglect the poor at the gate. Everything he has done has been aimed at the conservation of energy, the contraction of space, the intensification of culture. Burbank and his tribe represent in the vegetable world, Edison in the mechanical. Not only has he developed distinctly new species, but he has elucidated the intensive art of getting $1200 out of an electrical acre instead of $12—a manured market-garden inside London and a ten-bushel exhausted wheat farm outside Lawrence, Kansas, being the antipodes of productivity—yet very far short of exemplifying the difference of electrical yield between an acre of territory in Edison's "first New York district" and an acre in some small town.
Edison was initially very impressed with the potential of water power, and this incident shows he quickly jumped on that early opportunity. However, his focus was really on supplying major population centers, a task he believed could occupy his entire life. Other than providing isolated plants, he didn't further develop hydro-electric stations; that was up to others and the use of alternating current, which allowed engineers to harness remote energy sources and economically transmit thousands of horse-power up to two hundred miles at voltages of 80,000 and 100,000 volts. Because he insisted on using low-pressure direct current for densely populated areas as the only safe and truly universal way to deliver electrical energy to consumers, Edison is often inaccurately labeled as an opponent of alternating current. During a debate in 1890 regarding a measure in the Virginia legislature to restrict permissible current pressures for safety, he stated: "You should allow high pressure wherever the conditions are such that by no possible accident could that pressure enter the homes of consumers; you want to give them as much flexibility as possible." He continued, "If you want to utilize the falls down in Richmond and set up a water power station, it would be a great cost-saving to transport energy to the city. By digging a simple trench and installing an insulated cable to connect the station with central Richmond, where the cable comes up from the ground and connects to motors, the power from the falls would be delivered to these motors. If those motors drove dynamos that supplied low-pressure currents to the public, there would be no way for the high-pressure current to reach the public." In effect, Edison clearly distinguished between high-pressure alternating current for transmission and low-pressure direct current for distribution; this practice is exactly what’s used in all major cities today. There’s little reason to believe it will change. Financially, it may have been better for Edison if he hadn’t aligned himself so closely with one type of current, but that didn’t matter to him since it was about his beliefs; and Edison's beliefs are steadfast. Furthermore, the historical debate over alternating and direct currents resembles the "irrepressible conflict" we heard about years ago in national issues, highlighting another facet of Edison's character. As broad as the prairies and as free in thought as the winds that sweep them, he was uniquely opposed to inefficient and wasteful methods and plans that neglect the less fortunate. Everything he did aimed at conserving energy, reducing space, and enhancing culture. Burbank and his colleagues represent innovation in the vegetable realm, while Edison symbolizes it in the mechanical. Not only has he created distinct new technologies, but he has also demonstrated the intensive art of generating $1,200 from an electrical acre instead of just $12—a market garden enriched within London versus a ten-bushel depleted wheat farm outside Lawrence, Kansas—illustrating the stark differences in productivity. Yet, this still falls short of capturing the difference in electrical output between an acre in Edison's "first New York district" and an acre in a smaller town.
Edison's lighting work furnished an excellent basis—in fact, the only one—for the development of the alternating current now so generally employed in central-station work in America; and in the McGraw Electrical Directory of April, 1909, no fewer than 4164 stations out of 5780 reported its use. When the alternating current was introduced for practical purposes it was not needed for arc lighting, the circuit for which, from a single dynamo, would often be twenty or thirty miles in length, its current having a pressure of not less than five or six thousand volts. For some years it was not found feasible to operate motors on alternating-current circuits, and that reason was often urged against it seriously. It could not be used for electroplating or deposition, nor could it charge storage batteries, all of which are easily within the ability of the direct current. But when it came to be a question of lighting a scattered suburb, a group of dwellings on the outskirts, a remote country residence or a farm-house, the alternating current, in all elements save its danger, was and is ideal. Its thin wires can be carried cheaply over vast areas, and at each local point of consumption the transformer of size exactly proportioned to its local task takes the high-voltage transmission current and lowers its potential at a ratio of 20 or 40 to 1, for use in distribution and consumption circuits. This evolution has been quite distinct, with its own inventors like Gaulard and Gibbs and Stanley, but came subsequent to the work of supplying small, dense areas of population; the art thus growing from within, and using each new gain as a means for further achievement.
Edison's lighting work provided an excellent foundation—actually, the only one—for the development of the alternating current that is now widely used in central-station operations in America. According to the McGraw Electrical Directory from April 1909, 4,164 out of 5,780 stations reported using it. When alternating current was first introduced for practical applications, it wasn't needed for arc lighting, which often required a circuit from a single dynamo that could stretch twenty or thirty miles, with a voltage of at least five or six thousand volts. For several years, it wasn't feasible to run motors on alternating-current circuits, and this was frequently cited as a serious drawback. It couldn't be used for electroplating or deposition, nor could it charge storage batteries, all of which were easily managed by direct current. However, when it came to powering a dispersed suburb, a cluster of homes on the outskirts, a remote rural residence, or a farmhouse, alternating current was and still is ideal in every aspect except for its danger. Its thin wires can be run cheaply over large areas, and at each local consumption point, a transformer, sized exactly for its local task, takes the high-voltage transmission current and reduces its potential at a ratio of 20 or 40 to 1 for use in distribution and consumption circuits. This evolution has been quite distinct, with its own inventors like Gaulard, Gibbs, and Stanley, but occurred after the work of supplying small, densely populated areas; thus, the art developed organically, using each new achievement as a stepping stone for further progress.
Nor was the effect of such great advances as those made by Edison limited to the electrical field. Every department of mechanics was stimulated and benefited to an extraordinary degree. Copper for the circuits was more highly refined than ever before to secure the best conductivity, and purity was insisted on in every kind of insulation. Edison was intolerant of sham and shoddy, and nothing would satisfy him that could not stand cross-examination by microscope, test-tube, and galvanometer. It was, perhaps, the steam-engine on which the deepest imprint for good was made, referred to already in the remarks of Mr. F. J. Sprague in the preceding chapter, but best illustrated in the perfection of the modern high-speed engine of the Armington & Sims type. Unless he could secure an engine of smoother running and more exactly governed and regulated than those available for his dynamo and lamp, Edison realized that he would find it almost impossible to give a steady light. He did not want his customers to count the heart-beats of the engine in the flicker of the lamp. Not a single engine was even within gunshot of the standard thus set up, but the emergency called forth its man in Gardiner C. Sims, a talented draughtsman and designer who had been engaged in locomotive construction and in the engineering department of the United States Navy. He may be quoted as to what happened: "The deep interest, financial and moral, and friendly backing I received from Mr. Edison, together with valuable suggestions, enabled me to bring out the engine; as I was quite alone in the world—poor—I had found a friend who knew what he wanted and explained it clearly. Mr. Edison was a leader far ahead of the time. He compelled the design of the successful engine.
The impact of the significant advances made by Edison wasn't just in the electrical field. Every area of mechanics was energized and greatly benefited. Copper for the circuits was refined more than ever to ensure optimal conductivity, and purity was required in all types of insulation. Edison had no tolerance for anything fake or subpar; nothing satisfied him that couldn't withstand scrutiny from a microscope, test tube, or galvanometer. Perhaps the steam engine felt the most positive impact, as mentioned by Mr. F. J. Sprague in the previous chapter, but it was best shown in the advanced design of the modern high-speed engine like the one from Armington & Sims. Edison understood that unless he could get a smoother-running and more accurately governed engine than what was currently available for his dynamo and lamp, providing a steady light would be nearly impossible. He didn’t want his customers to measure the engine's heartbeat through the flickering lamp. No existing engine came close to the standard he set, but the situation prompted the emergence of Gardiner C. Sims, a skilled draughtsman and designer who had worked in locomotive engineering and the U.S. Navy’s engineering department. He shared what happened: "The deep interest, both financially and morally, and the support I received from Mr. Edison, along with his valuable suggestions, allowed me to create the engine; since I was rather alone in the world—poor—I found a friend who knew what he wanted and made it clear. Mr. Edison was a visionary far ahead of his time. He drove the design of the successful engine."
"Our first engine compelled the inventing and making of a suitable engine indicator to indicate it—the Tabor. He obtained the desired speed and load with a friction brake; also regulator of speed; but waited for an indicator to verify it. Then again there was no known way to lubricate an engine for continuous running, and Mr. Edison informed me that as a marine engine started before the ship left New York and continued running until it reached its home port, so an engine for his purposes must produce light at all times. That was a poser to me, for a five-hours' run was about all that had been required up to that time.
"Our first engine prompted the creation of a suitable engine indicator to show its performance—the Tabor. It achieved the required speed and load using a friction brake and a speed regulator, but it needed an indicator to confirm it. Additionally, there was no known method to lubricate an engine for continuous operation, and Mr. Edison told me that just as a marine engine starts before the ship departs New York and keeps running until it reaches its home port, an engine for his needs had to produce light at all times. That was a challenge for me, since a five-hour run was all that had been demanded until then."
"A day or two later Mr. Edison inquired: 'How far is it from here to Lawrence; it is a long walk, isn't it?' 'Yes, rather.' He said: 'Of course you will understand I meant without oil.' To say I was deeply perplexed does not express my feelings. We were at the machine works, Goerck Street. I started for the oil-room, when, about entering, I saw a small funnel lying on the floor. It had been stepped on and flattened. I took it up, and it had solved the engine-oiling problem—and my walk to Lawrence like a tramp actor's was off! The eccentric strap had a round glass oil-cup with a brass base that screwed into the strap. I took it off, and making a sketch, went to Dave Cunningham, having the funnel in my hand to illustrate what I wanted made. I requested him to make a sheet-brass oil-cup and solder it to the base I had. He did so. I then had a standard made to hold another oil-cup, so as to see and regulate the drop-feed. On this combination I obtained a patent which is now universally used."
A day or two later, Mr. Edison asked, "How far is it from here to Lawrence? It's a long walk, right?" "Yeah, kind of." He added, "Of course, you know I meant without oil." Saying I was really confused doesn't capture how I felt. We were at the machine shop on Goerck Street. I was about to head to the oil room when I noticed a small funnel lying on the floor. It had been stepped on and flattened. I picked it up, and it had solved the engine oiling issue—and suddenly my walk to Lawrence was off the table! The eccentric strap had a round glass oil cup with a brass base that screwed into it. I took it off and sketched it, then went to Dave Cunningham with the funnel in hand to show him what I wanted made. I asked him to create a sheet-brass oil cup and solder it to the base I had. He did that. I then had a standard made to hold another oil cup, so I could see and control the drop feed. I got a patent on that combination, which is now used everywhere.
It is needless to say that in due course the engine builders of the United States developed a variety of excellent prime movers for electric-light and power plants, and were grateful to the art from which such a stimulus came to their industry; but for many years one never saw an Edison installation without expecting to find one or more Armington & Sims high-speed engines part of it. Though the type has gone out of existence, like so many other things that are useful in their day and generation, it was once a very vital part of the art, and one more illustration of that intimate manner in which the advances in different fields of progress interact and co-operate.
It goes without saying that over time, engine builders in the United States created a range of outstanding prime movers for electric lighting and power plants, and they appreciated the industry that inspired their work. However, for many years, you could never see an Edison installation without expecting to find one or more high-speed engines made by Armington & Sims as part of it. Although this type has disappeared, like many other things that were once beneficial in their time, it was once a crucial element of the industry and serves as another example of how advancements in different areas of progress interact and collaborate.
Edison had installed his historic first great central-station system in New York on the multiple arc system covered by his feeder and main invention, which resulted in a notable saving in the cost of conductors as against a straight two-wire system throughout of the "tree" kind. He soon foresaw that still greater economy would be necessary for commercial success not alone for the larger territory opening, but for the compact districts of large cities. Being firmly convinced that there was a way out, he pushed aside a mass of other work, and settled down to this problem, with the result that on November 20, 1882, only two months after current had been sent out from Pearl Street, he executed an application for a patent covering what is now known as the "three-wire system." It has been universally recognized as one of the most valuable inventions in the history of the lighting art. [13] Its use resulted in a saving of over 60 per cent. of copper in conductors, figured on the most favorable basis previously known, inclusive of those calculated under his own feeder and main system. Such economy of outlay being effected in one of the heaviest items of expense in central-station construction, it was now made possible to establish plants in towns where the large investment would otherwise have been quite prohibitive. The invention is in universal use today, alike for direct and for alternating current, and as well in the equipment of large buildings as in the distribution system of the most extensive central-station networks. One cannot imagine the art without it.
Edison installed his groundbreaking first major central-station system in New York, using a multiple arc system that included his feeder and main invention. This innovation led to significant savings in conductor costs compared to a straight two-wire system like the "tree" type. He quickly recognized that even greater efficiency was necessary for commercial success, not just for expanding to larger areas, but also for the dense districts of big cities. Confident there was a solution, he set aside other projects to tackle this challenge. As a result, on November 20, 1882, just two months after electricity was first distributed from Pearl Street, he filed a patent application for what is now known as the "three-wire system." This invention is widely regarded as one of the most valuable breakthroughs in the history of electric lighting. Its implementation saved over 60 percent of copper in conductors when calculated against the most favorable methods previously known, including those based on his own feeder and main system. This cost reduction addressed one of the biggest expenses in central-station construction, making it feasible to establish plants in towns where such a large investment would have otherwise been prohibitively expensive. The invention is now in universal use, for both direct and alternating current, and is integral in the equipment of large buildings as well as in the distribution networks of extensive central-station systems. It's hard to imagine the technology without it.
[Footnote 13: For technical description and illustration of this invention, see Appendix.]
[Footnote 13: For a detailed description and illustration of this invention, see Appendix.]
The strong position held by the Edison system, under the strenuous competition that was already springing up, was enormously improved by the introduction of the three-wire system; and it gave an immediate impetus to incandescent lighting. Desiring to put this new system into practical use promptly, and receiving applications for licenses from all over the country, Edison selected Brockton, Massachusetts, and Sunbury, Pennsylvania, as the two towns for the trial. Of these two Brockton required the larger plant, but with the conductors placed underground. It was the first to complete its arrangements and close its contract. Mr. Henry Villard, it will be remembered, had married the daughter of Garrison, the famous abolitionist, and it was through his relationship with the Garrison family that Brockton came to have the honor of exemplifying so soon the principles of an entirely new art. Sunbury, however, was a much smaller installation, employed overhead conductors, and hence was the first to "cross the tape." It was specially suited for a trial plant also, in the early days when a yield of six or eight lamps to the horse-power was considered subject for congratulation. The town being situated in the coal region of Pennsylvania, good coal could then be obtained there at seventy-five cents a ton.
The strong position of the Edison system, even with the intense competition starting to emerge, was greatly enhanced by the introduction of the three-wire system; it gave a quick boost to incandescent lighting. Wanting to put this new system to practical use right away and receiving license applications from all across the country, Edison chose Brockton, Massachusetts, and Sunbury, Pennsylvania, as the two towns for the trial. Of the two, Brockton needed a larger plant, but with the conductors placed underground. It was the first to finalize its arrangements and close its contract. Mr. Henry Villard, as you may recall, had married the daughter of Garrison, the famous abolitionist, and through his connection with the Garrison family, Brockton got the honor of demonstrating the principles of an entirely new technology so soon. Sunbury, on the other hand, was a much smaller installation, used overhead conductors, and was therefore the first to "cross the finish line." It was also well-suited for a trial plant, especially in the early days when producing six or eight lamps per horse-power was something to celebrate. Since the town was located in the coal region of Pennsylvania, good coal could then be obtained for seventy-five cents a ton.
The Sunbury generating plant consisted of an Armington & Sims engine driving two small Edison dynamos having a total capacity of about four hundred lamps of 16 c.p. The indicating instruments were of the crudest construction, consisting of two voltmeters connected by "pressure wires" to the centre of electrical distribution. One ammeter, for measuring the quantity of current output, was interpolated in the "neutral bus" or third-wire return circuit to indicate when the load on the two machines was out of balance. The circuits were opened and closed by means of about half a dozen roughly made plug-switches. [14] The "bus-bars" to receive the current from the dynamos were made of No. 000 copper line wire, straightened out and fastened to the wooden sheathing of the station by iron staples without any presence to insulation. Commenting upon this Mr. W. S. Andrews, detailed from the central staff, says: "The interior winding of the Sunbury station, including the running of two three-wire feeders the entire length of the building from back to front, the wiring up of the dynamos and switchboard and all instruments, together with bus-bars, etc.—in fact, all labor and material used in the electrical wiring installation—amounted to the sum of $90. I received a rather sharp letter from the New York office expostulating for this EXTRAVAGANT EXPENDITURE, and stating that great economy must be observed in future!" The street conductors were of the overhead pole-line construction, and were installed by the construction company that had been organized by Edison to build and equip central stations. A special type of street pole had been devised by him for the three-wire system.
The Sunbury generating plant had an Armington & Sims engine powering two small Edison dynamos, which had a total capacity of about four hundred 16-c.p. lamps. The indicating instruments were very basic, consisting of two voltmeters connected by "pressure wires" to the center of electrical distribution. There was one ammeter used to measure the current output, placed in the "neutral bus" or third-wire return circuit to show when the load on the two machines was unbalanced. The circuits were opened and closed with about six rough plug switches. The "bus-bars" receiving current from the dynamos were made from No. 000 copper line wire, straightened out and secured to the wooden sheathing of the station with iron staples without any insulation. Commenting on this, Mr. W. S. Andrews, sent from the central office, said: "The interior wiring of the Sunbury station, including the installation of two three-wire feeders running the full length of the building, wiring the dynamos and switchboard, and all instruments, as well as bus-bars, etc.—in fact, all labor and materials used in the electrical wiring installation—cost a total of $90. I received a rather stern letter from the New York office complaining about this EXTRAVAGANT EXPENDITURE, and stating that significant economy must be practiced moving forward!" The street conductors were built with an overhead pole-line design and were installed by the construction company that Edison had organized to build and equip central stations. He developed a special type of street pole for the three-wire system.
[Footnote 14: By reason of the experience gained at this station through the use of these crude plug-switches, Mr. Edison started a competition among a few of his assistants to devise something better. The result was the invention of a "breakdown" switch by Mr. W. S. Andrews, which was accepted by Mr. Edison as the best of the devices suggested, and was developed and used for a great many years afterward.]
[Footnote 14: Because of the experience gained at this station from using these basic plug switches, Mr. Edison launched a competition among some of his assistants to create something better. The outcome was the invention of a "breakdown" switch by Mr. W. S. Andrews, which Mr. Edison accepted as the best of the proposed devices and was developed and used for many years afterward.]
Supplementing the story of Mr. Andrews is that of Lieut. F. J. Sprague, who also gives a curious glimpse of the glorious uncertainties and vicissitudes of that formative period. Mr. Sprague served on the jury at the Crystal Palace Exhibition with Darwin's son—the present Sir Horace—and after the tests were ended left the Navy and entered Edison's service at the suggestion of Mr. E. H. Johnson, who was Edison's shrewd recruiting sergeant in those days: "I resigned sooner than Johnson expected, and he had me on his hands. Meanwhile he had called upon me to make a report of the three-wire system, known in England as the Hopkinson, both Dr. John Hopkinson and Mr. Edison being independent inventors at practically the same time. I reported on that, left London, and landed in New York on the day of the opening of the Brooklyn Bridge in 1883—May 24—with a year's leave of absence.
Supplementing Mr. Andrews' story is the one of Lieut. F. J. Sprague, who offers an intriguing look at the exciting uncertainties and challenges of that formative period. Mr. Sprague was part of the jury at the Crystal Palace Exhibition alongside Darwin's son—the current Sir Horace—and after the evaluations were complete, he left the Navy to join Edison's team at the suggestion of Mr. E. H. Johnson, who was Edison's smart recruiter back then: "I resigned sooner than Johnson anticipated, and he was stuck with me. In the meantime, he had asked me to report on the three-wire system, known in England as the Hopkinson, with both Dr. John Hopkinson and Mr. Edison being independent inventors around the same time. I submitted that report, left London, and arrived in New York on the day the Brooklyn Bridge opened in 1883—May 24—with a year's leave of absence."
"I reported at the office of Mr. Edison on Fifth Avenue and told him I had seen Johnson. He looked me over and said: 'What did he promise you?' I replied: 'Twenty-five hundred dollars a year.' He did not say much, but looked it. About that time Mr. Andrews and I came together. On July 2d of that year we were ordered to Sunbury, and to be ready to start the station on the fourth. The electrical work had to be done in forty-eight hours! Having travelled around the world, I had cultivated an indifference to any special difficulties of that kind. Mr. Andrews and I worked in collaboration until the night of the third. I think he was perhaps more appreciative than I was of the discipline of the Edison Construction Department, and thought it would be well for us to wait until the morning of the fourth before we started up. I said we were sent over to get going, and insisted on starting up on the night of the third. We had an Armington & Sims engine with sight-feed oiler. I had never seen one, and did not know how it worked, with the result that we soon burned up the babbitt metal in the bearings and spent a good part of the night getting them in order. The next day Mr. Edison, Mr. Insull, and the chief engineer of the construction department appeared on the scene and wanted to know what had happened. They found an engine somewhat loose in the bearings, and there followed remarks which would not look well in print. Andrews skipped from under; he obeyed orders; I did not. But the plant ran, and it was the first three-wire station in this country."
I reported to Mr. Edison’s office on Fifth Avenue and told him that I had seen Johnson. He looked me over and asked, “What did he promise you?” I replied, “Twenty-five hundred dollars a year.” He didn’t say much, but his expression said it all. Around that time, I teamed up with Mr. Andrews. On July 2nd of that year, we were ordered to Sunbury and told to be ready to start the station on the fourth. We had to complete the electrical work in just forty-eight hours! Having traveled all over the world, I had developed a nonchalance toward challenges like that. Mr. Andrews and I worked together until the night of the third. I think he was probably more aware of the discipline of the Edison Construction Department and suggested that we wait until the morning of the fourth to start up. I insisted we were sent to get started right away and wanted to begin on the night of the third. We had an Armington & Sims engine with a sight-feed oiler. I had never seen one before and didn’t know how it worked, which led to us burning up the babbitt metal in the bearings and spending a good part of the night fixing them. The next day, Mr. Edison, Mr. Insull, and the chief engineer of the construction department showed up and wanted to know what happened. They discovered an engine that was a bit loose in the bearings, and there were comments made that wouldn’t look good in print. Andrews managed to fly under the radar; he followed the orders; I didn’t. But the plant was running, and it was the first three-wire station in the country.
Seen from yet another angle, the worries of this early work were not merely those of the men on the "firing line." Mr. Insull, in speaking of this period, says: "When it was found difficult to push the central-station business owing to the lack of confidence in its financial success, Edison decided to go into the business of promoting and constructing central-station plants, and he formed what was known as the Thomas A. Edison Construction Department, which he put me in charge of. The organization was crude, the steam-engineering talent poor, and owing to the impossibility of getting any considerable capital subscribed, the plants were put in as cheaply as possible. I believe that this construction department was unkindly named the 'Destruction Department.' It served its purpose; never made any money; and I had the unpleasant task of presiding at its obsequies."
Looking at it from another perspective, the concerns of this early work weren't just those of the men on the "firing line." Mr. Insull said about this time: "When it became challenging to advance the central-station business due to a lack of confidence in its financial viability, Edison decided to get into the business of promoting and building central-station plants, and he created what was called the Thomas A. Edison Construction Department, which he put me in charge of. The organization was basic, the steam-engineering skills were lacking, and because it was impossible to secure substantial capital, the plants were built as cheaply as possible. I believe this construction department was unflatteringly referred to as the 'Destruction Department.' It served its purpose; never made any profit; and I had the uncomfortable job of overseeing its closing."
On July 4th the Sunbury plant was put into commercial operation by Edison, and he remained a week studying its conditions and watching for any unforeseen difficulty that might arise. Nothing happened, however, to interfere with the successful running of the station, and for twenty years thereafter the same two dynamos continued to furnish light in Sunbury. They were later used as reserve machines, and finally, with the engine, retired from service as part of the "Collection of Edisonia"; but they remain in practically as good condition as when installed in 1883.
On July 4th, the Sunbury plant started commercial operation thanks to Edison, who stayed for a week to study its conditions and keep an eye out for any unexpected issues. However, nothing came up that affected the smooth operation of the station, and for the next twenty years, the same two dynamos continued to provide light in Sunbury. They were later used as backup machines and eventually, along with the engine, retired from service as part of the "Collection of Edisonia"; but they are still in nearly as good condition as when they were installed in 1883.
Sunbury was also provided with the first electro-chemical meters used in the United States outside New York City, so that it served also to accentuate electrical practice in a most vital respect—namely, the measurement of the electrical energy supplied to customers. At this time and long after, all arc lighting was done on a "flat rate" basis. The arc lamp installed outside a customer's premises, or in a circuit for public street lighting, burned so many hours nightly, so many nights in the month; and was paid for at that rate, subject to rebate for hours when the lamp might be out through accident. The early arc lamps were rated to require 9 to 10 amperes of current, at 45 volts pressure each, receiving which they were estimated to give 2000 c.p., which was arrived at by adding together the light found at four different positions, so that in reality the actual light was about 500 c.p. Few of these data were ever actually used, however; and it was all more or less a matter of guesswork, although the central-station manager, aiming to give good service, would naturally see that the dynamos were so operated as to maintain as steadily as possible the normal potential and current. The same loose methods applied to the early attempts to use electric motors on arc-lighting circuits, and contracts were made based on the size of the motor, the width of the connecting belt, or the amount of power the customer thought he used—never on the measurement of the electrical energy furnished him.
Sunbury was also equipped with the first electro-chemical meters used in the United States outside of New York City, which highlighted the importance of measuring the electrical energy supplied to customers. At the time and for a long period after, all arc lighting was billed on a "flat rate" basis. The arc lamp installed outside a customer’s property, or in a circuit for public street lighting, burned for a certain number of hours each night, for certain nights in the month; payment was made based on that rate, with a rebate for hours when the lamp was out due to an accident. The early arc lamps were designed to require 9 to 10 amperes of current at 45 volts each, which were estimated to provide 2000 candlepower (c.p.) by adding the light measured at four different positions, although in reality, the actual light output was about 500 c.p. Few of these data points were ever accurately used, and it was largely a guessing game, although the central-station manager, intending to provide good service, would naturally ensure that the generators were operated to maintain as steady a potential and current as possible. The same unreliable methods applied to the early efforts to use electric motors on arc-lighting circuits, and contracts were made based on the size of the motor, the width of the connecting belt, or the amount of power the customer believed he was using—never on the actual measurement of the electrical energy supplied to him.
Here again Edison laid the foundation of standard practice. It is true that even down to the present time the flat rate is applied to a great deal of incandescent lighting, each lamp being charged for individually according to its probable consumption during each month. This may answer, perhaps, in a small place where the manager can gauge pretty closely from actual observation what each customer does; but even then there are elements of risk and waste; and obviously in a large city such a method would soon be likely to result in financial disaster to the plant. Edison held that the electricity sold must be measured just like gas or water, and he proceeded to develop a meter. There was infinite scepticism around him on the subject, and while other inventors were also giving the subject their thought, the public took it for granted that anything so utterly intangible as electricity, that could not be seen or weighed, and only gave secondary evidence of itself at the exact point of use, could not be brought to accurate registration. The general attitude of doubt was exemplified by the incident in Mr. J. P. Morgan's office, noted in the last chapter. Edison, however, had satisfied himself that there were various ways of accomplishing the task, and had determined that the current should be measured on the premises of every consumer. His electrolytic meter was very successful, and was of widespread use in America and in Europe until the perfection of mechanical meters by Elihu Thomson and others brought that type into general acceptance. Hence the Edison electrolytic meter is no longer used, despite its excellent qualities. Houston & Kennelly in their Electricity in Everyday Life sum the matter up as follows: "The Edison chemical meter is capable of giving fair measurements of the amount of current passing. By reason, however, of dissatisfaction caused from the inability of customers to read the indications of the meter, it has in later years, to a great extent, been replaced by registering meters that can be read by the customer."
Here again, Edison established the groundwork for standard practices. Even today, a flat rate is still used for many incandescent lights, with each lamp being billed individually based on its expected usage each month. This might work in a small setting where the manager can closely monitor each customer's consumption; however, there are still risks and waste involved. Clearly, in a large city, this approach could quickly lead to financial trouble for the utility. Edison argued that electricity should be measured just like gas or water, and he set out to create a meter for it. There was a lot of skepticism around him regarding this issue, and while other inventors were also thinking about it, the public assumed that something as intangible as electricity, which couldn’t be seen or weighed and only showed its effects at the exact point of use, couldn’t be accurately measured. This general doubt was highlighted by an incident in Mr. J. P. Morgan's office mentioned in the last chapter. However, Edison was convinced there were ways to achieve this and decided that the current should be measured at every consumer's location. His electrolytic meter was quite successful and widely used in both America and Europe until Elihu Thomson and others perfected mechanical meters, which became more popular. As a result, the Edison electrolytic meter is no longer in use, even though it was highly effective. Houston & Kennelly summarize this in their book Electricity in Everyday Life: "The Edison chemical meter is capable of providing reliable measurements of the amount of current passing. However, due to customer dissatisfaction with the meter's readability, it has largely been replaced by registering meters that customers can easily read."
The principle employed in the Edison electrolytic meter is that which exemplifies the power of electricity to decompose a chemical substance. In other words it is a deposition bath, consisting of a glass cell in which two plates of chemically pure zinc are dipped in a solution of zinc sulphate. When the lights or motors in the circuit are turned on, and a certain definite small portion of the current is diverted to flow through the meter, from the positive plate to the negative plate, the latter increases in weight by receiving a deposit of metallic zinc; the positive plate meantime losing in weight by the metal thus carried away from it. This difference in weight is a very exact measure of the quantity of electricity, or number of ampere-hours, that have, so to speak, passed through the cell, and hence of the whole consumption in the circuit. The amount thus due from the customer is ascertained by removing the cell, washing and drying the plates, and weighing them in a chemical balance. Associated with this simple form of apparatus were various ingenious details and refinements to secure regularity of operation, freedom from inaccuracy, and immunity from such tampering as would permit theft of current or damage. As the freezing of the zinc sulphate solution in cold weather would check its operation, Edison introduced, for example, into the meter an incandescent lamp and a thermostat so arranged that when the temperature fell to a certain point, or rose above another point, it was cut in or out; and in this manner the meter could be kept from freezing. The standard Edison meter practice was to remove the cells once a month to the meter-room of the central-station company for examination, another set being substituted. The meter was cheap to manufacture and install, and not at all liable to get out of order.
The Edison electrolytic meter works on the principle of using electricity to break down a chemical substance. In simple terms, it acts as a deposition bath, made up of a glass cell containing two plates of pure zinc submerged in a zinc sulfate solution. When the lights or motors in the circuit are switched on and a small portion of the current flows through the meter, moving from the positive plate to the negative plate, the negative plate gains weight by receiving a deposit of metallic zinc. Meanwhile, the positive plate loses weight as zinc is taken from it. This change in weight accurately measures the amount of electricity, or number of ampere-hours, that has passed through the cell, providing a count of total consumption in the circuit. The charge to the customer is determined by taking out the cell, washing and drying the plates, and weighing them on a chemical balance. This basic setup included several clever features and improvements to ensure smooth operation, accuracy, and protection against tampering that could lead to theft of electricity or damage. To prevent the zinc sulfate solution from freezing in cold weather, Edison added an incandescent lamp and a thermostat to the meter; this setup automatically turns the lamp on or off depending on the temperature. The standard practice for Edison meters was to remove the cells monthly for inspection at the central-station company's meter room, replacing them with another set. The meter was inexpensive to make and install and was highly reliable.
In December, 1888, Mr. W. J. Jenks read an interesting paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers on the six years of practical experience had up to that time with the meter, then more generally in use than any other. It appears from the paper that twenty-three Edison stations were then equipped with 5187 meters, which were relied upon for billing the monthly current consumption of 87,856 lamps and 350 motors of 1000 horse-power total. This represented about 75 per cent. of the entire lamp capacity of the stations. There was an average cost per lamp for meter operation of twenty-two cents a year, and each meter took care of an average of seventeen lamps. It is worthy of note, as to the promptness with which the Edison stations became paying properties, that four of the metered stations were earning upward of 15 per cent. on their capital stock; three others between 8 and 10 per cent.; eight between 5 and 8 per cent.; the others having been in operation too short a time to show definite results, although they also went quickly to a dividend basis. Reports made in the discussion at the meeting by engineers showed the simplicity and success of the meter. Mr. C. L. Edgar, of the Boston Edison system, stated that he had 800 of the meters in service cared for by two men and three boys, the latter employed in collecting the meter cells; the total cost being perhaps $2500 a year. Mr. J. W. Lieb wrote from Milan, Italy, that he had in use on the Edison system there 360 meters ranging from 350 ampere-hours per month up to 30,000.
In December 1888, Mr. W. J. Jenks presented an interesting paper to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers about six years of practical experience with the meter, which was more commonly used at the time than any other. According to the paper, twenty-three Edison stations were equipped with 5,187 meters, which were used to bill the monthly electricity usage of 87,856 lamps and 350 motors with a total of 1,000 horsepower. This accounted for about 75 percent of the total lamp capacity of the stations. The average cost per lamp for meter operation was twenty-two cents a year, and each meter managed an average of seventeen lamps. Notably, the promptness with which the Edison stations became profitable properties was impressive; four of the metered stations were earning over 15 percent on their capital stock, three others between 8 and 10 percent, eight between 5 and 8 percent, while the remaining stations had been in operation for too short a period to show definite results, although they quickly reached a point where they paid dividends. Reports from engineers during the meeting discussed the simplicity and effectiveness of the meter. Mr. C. L. Edgar from the Boston Edison system mentioned that he had 800 meters in service managed by two men and three boys, the latter collecting the meter cells, with an estimated total cost of about $2,500 a year. Mr. J. W. Lieb reported from Milan, Italy, that he was using 360 meters on the Edison system there, with monthly usage ranging from 350 ampere-hours to 30,000.
In this connection it should be mentioned that the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies in the same year adopted resolutions unanimously to the effect that the Edison meter was accurate, and that its use was not expensive for stations above one thousand lights; and that the best financial results were invariably secured in a station selling current by meter. Before the same association, at its meeting in September, 1898, at Sault Ste. Marie, Mr. C. S. Shepard read a paper on the meter practice of the New York Edison Company, giving data as to the large number of Edison meters in use and the transition to other types, of which to-day the company has several on its circuits: "Until October, 1896, the New York Edison Company metered its current in consumer's premises exclusively by the old-style chemical meters, of which there were connected on that date 8109. It was then determined to purchase no more." Mr. Shepard went on to state that the chemical meters were gradually displaced, and that on September 1, 1898, there were on the system 5619 mechanical and 4874 chemical. The meter continued in general service during 1899, and probably up to the close of the century.
In this context, it's important to note that in the same year, the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies unanimously passed resolutions stating that the Edison meter was accurate and that using it was not costly for stations with over a thousand lights. They also found that the best financial results were consistently achieved in stations selling current by meter. At the same association's meeting in September 1898, in Sault Ste. Marie, Mr. C. S. Shepard presented a paper on the meter practices of the New York Edison Company, providing information on the large number of Edison meters in use and the shift to other types, of which the company currently has several on its circuits. "Until October 1896, the New York Edison Company exclusively used old-style chemical meters to meter its current at consumer premises, and on that date, there were 8,109 connected. It was then decided to purchase no more." Mr. Shepard continued to explain that the chemical meters were gradually phased out, and by September 1, 1898, there were 5,619 mechanical meters and 4,874 chemical meters in the system. The meters remained in general use throughout 1899, likely until the end of the century.
Mr. Andrews relates a rather humorous meter story of those early days: "The meter man at Sunbury was a firm and enthusiastic believer in the correctness of the Edison meter, having personally verified its reading many times by actual comparison of lamp-hours. One day, on making out a customer's bill, his confidence received a severe shock, for the meter reading showed a consumption calling for a charge of over $200, whereas he knew that the light actually used should not cost more than one-quarter of that amount. He weighed and reweighed the meter plates, and pursued every line of investigation imaginable, but all in vain. He felt he was up against it, and that perhaps another kind of a job would suit him better. Once again he went to the customer's meter to look around, when a small piece of thick wire on the floor caught his eye. The problem was solved. He suddenly remembered that after weighing the plates he went and put them in the customer's meter; but the wire attached to one of the plates was too long to go in the meter, and he had cut it off. He picked up the piece of wire, took it to the station, weighed it carefully, and found that it accounted for about $150 worth of electricity, which was the amount of the difference."
Mr. Andrews shares a rather funny story about the early days: "The meter reader at Sunbury was a strong and enthusiastic believer in the accuracy of the Edison meter, having personally checked its readings many times against actual lamp-hours. One day, while preparing a customer's bill, his confidence took a big hit, as the meter reading indicated usage that would cost over $200, while he knew that the actual lighting used shouldn't be more than a quarter of that amount. He weighed and reweighed the meter plates and explored every possible investigation, but nothing worked. He realized he was in over his head and thought maybe another kind of job would suit him better. Once again, he went to check the customer's meter and noticed a small piece of thick wire on the floor. The mystery was solved. He suddenly remembered that after weighing the plates, he had put them back in the customer's meter; however, the wire attached to one of the plates was too long to fit into the meter, so he had cut it off. He picked up the wire, took it to the station, weighed it carefully, and found that it accounted for about $150 worth of electricity, which was the exact difference."
Edison himself is, however, the best repertory of stories when it comes to the difficulties of that early period, in connection with metering the current and charging for it. He may be quoted at length as follows: "When we started the station at Pearl Street, in September, 1882, we were not very commercial. We put many customers on, but did not make out many bills. We were more interested in the technical condition of the station than in the commercial part. We had meters in which there were two bottles of liquid. To prevent these electrolytes from freezing we had in each meter a strip of metal. When it got very cold the metal would contract and close a circuit, and throw a lamp into circuit inside the meter. The heat from this lamp would prevent the liquid from freezing, so that the meter could go on doing its duty. The first cold day after starting the station, people began to come in from their offices, especially down in Front Street and Water Street, saying the meter was on fire. We received numerous telephone messages about it. Some had poured water on it, and others said: 'Send a man right up to put it out.'
Edison himself is the best source of stories about the challenges of that early period related to measuring the current and billing for it. He can be quoted at length: "When we launched the station at Pearl Street in September 1882, we weren't very commercial. We signed up many customers but didn't issue many bills. We were more focused on the technical aspects of the station rather than the business side. We had meters with two bottles of liquid. To keep these electrolytes from freezing, we included a metal strip in each meter. When it got really cold, the metal would contract, close a circuit, and activate a lamp inside the meter. The heat from this lamp would stop the liquid from freezing, allowing the meter to keep working. On the first cold day after we started the station, people began coming in from their offices, especially from Front Street and Water Street, saying the meter was on fire. We got numerous phone calls about it. Some had poured water on it, while others insisted, 'Send someone right up to put it out.'"
"After the station had been running several months and was technically a success, we began to look after the financial part. We started to collect some bills; but we found that our books were kept badly, and that the person in charge, who was no business man, had neglected that part of it. In fact, he did not know anything about the station, anyway. So I got the directors to permit me to hire a man to run the station. This was Mr. Chinnock, who was then superintendent of the Metropolitan Telephone Company of New York. I knew Chinnock to be square and of good business ability, and induced him to leave his job. I made him a personal guarantee, that if he would take hold of the station and put it on a commercial basis, and pay 5 per cent. on $600,000, I would give him $10,000 out of my own pocket. He took hold, performed the feat, and I paid him the $10,000. I might remark in this connection that years afterward I applied to the Edison Electric Light Company asking them if they would not like to pay me this money, as it was spent when I was very hard up and made the company a success, and was the foundation of their present prosperity. They said they 'were sorry'—that is, 'Wall Street sorry'—and refused to pay it. This shows what a nice, genial, generous lot of people they have over in Wall Street.
"After the station had been operating for several months and was technically a success, we started to focus on the financial side. We began collecting some bills, but we discovered that our records were poorly maintained and that the person in charge, who wasn't a businessman, had neglected that aspect. In fact, he didn’t know much about the station at all. So I got the directors to allow me to hire someone to manage the station. That was Mr. Chinnock, who was then the superintendent of the Metropolitan Telephone Company of New York. I knew Chinnock was reliable and had good business skills, and I convinced him to leave his job. I personally guaranteed him that if he came on board and put the station on a commercial footing, and paid 5 percent on $600,000, I would give him $10,000 out of my own pocket. He took over, delivered on the promise, and I paid him the $10,000. I should mention that years later I approached the Edison Electric Light Company to ask if they would consider reimbursing me for that money, since it was spent when I was in a tough spot and helped make the company successful, laying the foundation for their current prosperity. They said they 'were sorry'—that is, 'Wall Street sorry'—and refused to pay it. This just goes to show what a nice, friendly, and generous bunch of people they have over in Wall Street."
"Chinnock had a great deal of trouble getting the customers straightened out. I remember one man who had a saloon on Nassau Street. He had had his lights burning for two or three months. It was in June, and Chinnock put in a bill for $20; July for $20; August about $28; September about $35. Of course the nights were getting longer. October about $40; November about $45. Then the man called Chinnock up. He said: 'I want to see you about my electric-light bill.' Chinnock went up to see him. He said: 'Are you the manager of this electric-light plant?' Chinnock said: 'I have the honor.' 'Well,' he said, my bill has gone from $20 up to $28, $35, $45. I want you to understand, young fellow, that my limit is $60.'
Chinnock had a tough time getting the customers sorted out. I remember this one guy who owned a bar on Nassau Street. He’d had his lights on for two or three months. It was June, and Chinnock sent him a bill for $20; July for $20; August was about $28; September around $35. Of course, the nights were getting longer. October’s bill was about $40; November’s was about $45. Then the guy called Chinnock. He said, "I want to talk to you about my electric bill." Chinnock went to see him. The guy asked, "Are you the manager of this electric plant?" Chinnock replied, "I am." The guy continued, "Well, my bill has gone from $20 to $28, then $35, and now $45. I want you to understand, young man, that my limit is $60."
"After Chinnock had had all this trouble due to the incompetency of the previous superintendent, a man came in and said to him: 'Did Mr. Blank have charge of this station?' 'Yes.' 'Did he know anything about running a station like this?' Chinnock said: 'Does he KNOW anything about running a station like this? No, sir. He doesn't even suspect anything.'
"After Chinnock had all this trouble because of the previous superintendent's incompetence, a man came in and asked him, 'Did Mr. Blank manage this station?' 'Yes.' 'Did he know anything about running a station like this?' Chinnock replied, 'Does he KNOW anything about running a station like this? No, sir. He doesn't even have a clue.'"
"One day Chinnock came to me and said: 'I have a new customer.' I said: 'What is it?' He said: 'I have a fellow who is going to take two hundred and fifty lights.' I said: 'What for?' 'He has a place down here in a top loft, and has got two hundred and fifty barrels of "rotgut" whiskey. He puts a light down in the barrel and lights it up, and it ages the whiskey.' I met Chinnock several weeks after, and said: 'How is the whiskey man getting along?' 'It's all right; he is paying his bill. It fixes the whiskey and takes the shudder right out of it.' Somebody went and took out a patent on this idea later.
"One day Chinnock came to me and said, 'I have a new customer.' I asked, 'What is it?' He replied, 'I have a guy who's going to order two hundred and fifty lights.' I inquired, 'What for?' He explained, 'He has a place down here in a top loft, and he's got two hundred and fifty barrels of cheap whiskey. He puts a light inside the barrel and lights it up, which ages the whiskey.' I ran into Chinnock a few weeks later and asked, 'How's the whiskey guy doing?' He said, 'It's all good; he's paying his bill. It improves the whiskey and takes the bite out of it.' Later on, someone took out a patent for this idea."
"In the second year we put the Stock Exchange on the circuits of the station, but were very fearful that there would be a combination of heavy demand and a dark day, and that there would be an overloaded station. We had an index like a steam-gauge, called an ampere-meter, to indicate the amount of current going out. I was up at 65 Fifth Avenue one afternoon. A sudden black cloud came up, and I telephoned to Chinnock and asked him about the load. He said: 'We are up to the muzzle, and everything is running all right.' By-and-by it became so thick we could not see across the street. I telephoned again, and felt something would happen, but fortunately it did not. I said to Chinnock: 'How is it now?' He replied: 'Everything is red-hot, and the ampere-meter has made seventeen revolutions.'"
"In the second year, we connected the Stock Exchange to the station circuits, but we were really worried that a huge demand combined with a stormy day would overload the station. We had a gauge, like a steam-gauge, called an ampere-meter, to show how much current was being sent out. One afternoon, I was at 65 Fifth Avenue when a sudden dark cloud rolled in, so I called Chinnock to ask about the load. He said, 'We’re maxed out, and everything is running fine.' Eventually, it got so dark we couldn’t see across the street. I called again, feeling that something might happen, but luckily it didn’t. I asked Chinnock, 'How's it looking now?' He replied, 'Everything is red-hot, and the ampere-meter has made seventeen revolutions.'"
In 1883 no such fittings as "fixture insulators" were known. It was the common practice to twine the electric wires around the disused gas-fixtures, fasten them with tape or string, and connect them to lamp-sockets screwed into attachments under the gas-burners—elaborated later into what was known as the "combination fixture." As a result it was no uncommon thing to see bright sparks snapping between the chandelier and the lighting wires during a sharp thunder-storm. A startling manifestation of this kind happened at Sunbury, when the vivid display drove nervous guests of the hotel out into the street, and the providential storm led Mr. Luther Stieringer to invent the "insulating joint." This separated the two lighting systems thoroughly, went into immediate service, and is universally used to-day.
In 1883, there were no fittings known as "fixture insulators." It was common practice to wrap electric wires around old gas fixtures, secure them with tape or string, and connect them to lamp sockets screwed into fittings beneath the gas burners—later developed into what we call the "combination fixture." Because of this, it wasn't unusual to see bright sparks jumping between the chandelier and the lighting wires during a fierce thunderstorm. A shocking incident like this occurred in Sunbury, where the intense display forced nervous hotel guests out into the street, and the fortunate storm prompted Mr. Luther Stieringer to invent the "insulating joint." This effectively separated the two lighting systems and went into immediate use, becoming standard today.
Returning to the more specific subject of pioneer plants of importance, that at Brockton must be considered for a moment, chiefly for the reason that the city was the first in the world to possess an Edison station distributing current through an underground three-wire network of conductors—the essentially modern contemporaneous practice, standard twenty-five years later. It was proposed to employ pole-line construction with overhead wires, and a party of Edison engineers drove about the town in an open barouche with a blue-print of the circuits and streets spread out on their knees, to determine how much tree-trimming would be necessary. When they came to some heavily shaded spots, the fine trees were marked "T" to indicate that the work in getting through them would be "tough." Where the trees were sparse and the foliage was thin, the same cheerful band of vandals marked the spots "E" to indicate that there it would be "easy" to run the wires. In those days public opinion was not so alive as now to the desirability of preserving shade-trees, and of enhancing the beauty of a city instead of destroying it. Brockton had a good deal of pride in its fine trees, and a strong sentiment was very soon aroused against the mutilation proposed so thoughtlessly. The investors in the enterprise were ready and anxious to meet the extra cost of putting the wires underground. Edison's own wishes were altogether for the use of the methods he had so carefully devised; and hence that bustling home of shoe manufacture was spared this infliction of more overhead wires.
Returning to the more specific topic of important pioneer plants, we must consider Brockton for a moment, especially because it was the first city in the world to have an Edison station that distributed electricity through an underground three-wire network—the modern standard practice that became common twenty-five years later. It was suggested to use pole-line construction with overhead wires, and a team of Edison engineers drove around the town in an open carriage, with a blueprint of the circuits and streets spread out on their laps, to figure out how much tree-trimming would be necessary. When they encountered heavily shaded areas, they marked the fine trees with "T" to indicate that getting through them would be "tough." Where the trees were sparse and the foliage was light, the same cheerful group of vandals marked those spots with "E" to show that it would be "easy" to run the wires. Back then, public opinion wasn't as aware of the need to preserve shade trees and enhance the beauty of a city rather than destroy it. Brockton took great pride in its beautiful trees, and strong feelings quickly arose against the proposed destruction. The investors in the project were ready and willing to cover the extra costs of burying the wires. Edison himself preferred the methods he had meticulously designed; thus, this bustling center of shoe manufacturing was spared the burden of additional overhead wires.
The station equipment at Brockton consisted at first of three dynamos, one of which was so arranged as to supply both sides of the system during light loads by a breakdown switch connection. This arrangement interfered with correct meter registration, as the meters on one side of the system registered backward during the hours in which the combination was employed. Hence, after supplying an all-night customer whose lamps were on one side of the circuits, the company might be found to owe him some thing substantial in the morning. Soon after the station went into operation this ingenious plan was changed, and the third dynamo was replaced by two others. The Edison construction department took entire charge of the installation of the plant, and the formal opening was attended on October 1, 1883, by Mr. Edison, who then remained a week in ceaseless study and consultation over the conditions developed by this initial three-wire underground plant. Some idea of the confidence inspired by the fame of Edison at this period is shown by the fact that the first theatre ever lighted from a central station by incandescent lamps was designed this year, and opened in 1884 at Brockton with an equipment of three hundred lamps. The theatre was never piped for gas! It was also from the Brockton central station that current was first supplied to a fire-engine house—another display of remarkably early belief in the trustworthiness of the service, under conditions where continuity of lighting was vital. The building was equipped in such a manner that the striking of the fire-alarm would light every lamp in the house automatically and liberate the horses. It was at this central station that Lieutenant Sprague began his historic work on the electric motor; and here that another distinguished engineer and inventor, Mr. H. Ward Leonard, installed the meters and became meter man, in order that he might study in every intimate detail the improvements and refinements necessary in that branch of the industry.
The equipment at the Brockton station initially included three dynamos, one of which was set up to provide power to both sides of the system during light loads using a breakdown switch connection. This setup caused issues with accurate meter readings, as the meters on one side recorded backward when this combination was in use. As a result, after serving an all-night customer whose lights were on one side of the circuits, the company could end up owing him a significant amount by morning. Shortly after the station started operating, this clever arrangement was modified, and the third dynamo was replaced with two others. The Edison construction department managed the entire installation of the facility, and the formal opening took place on October 1, 1883, attended by Mr. Edison, who spent a week diligently studying and consulting on the conditions created by this first three-wire underground plant. The trust in Edison’s reputation at that time is illustrated by the fact that the first theater ever lit by incandescent lamps from a central station was designed that year and opened in 1884 in Brockton, outfitted with three hundred lamps. The theater was never fitted for gas! It was also at the Brockton central station where power was first supplied to a firehouse—another testament to the early belief in the reliability of the service, especially where consistent lighting was essential. The building was designed so that when the fire alarm rang, every lamp in the house would light up automatically and free the horses. It was at this central station that Lieutenant Sprague began his groundbreaking work on the electric motor; and here, another notable engineer and inventor, Mr. H. Ward Leonard, installed the meters and became the meter man to study in detail the necessary improvements and refinements in that aspect of the industry.
The authors are indebted for these facts and some other data embodied in this book to Mr. W. J. Jenks, who as manager of this plant here made his debut in the Edison ranks. He had been connected with local telephone interests, but resigned to take active charge of this plant, imbibing quickly the traditional Edison spirit, working hard all day and sleeping in the station at night on a cot brought there for that purpose. It was a time of uninterrupted watchfulness. The difficulty of obtaining engineers in those days to run the high-speed engines (three hundred and fifty revolutions per minute) is well illustrated by an amusing incident in the very early history of the station. A locomotive engineer had been engaged, as it was supposed he would not be afraid of anything. One evening there came a sudden flash of fire and a spluttering, sizzling noise. There had been a short-circuit on the copper mains in the station. The fireman hid behind the boiler and the engineer jumped out of the window. Mr. Sprague realized the trouble, quickly threw off the current and stopped the engine.
The authors would like to thank Mr. W. J. Jenks for the facts and other information included in this book. He joined the Edison team as the manager of this plant, having previously been involved with local telephone companies, but he left that role to take charge here. He quickly adopted the traditional Edison spirit, working long hours during the day and sleeping on a cot in the station at night. It was a time that required constant vigilance. Finding engineers to operate the high-speed engines (running at three hundred and fifty revolutions per minute) was quite challenging, as illustrated by a funny incident from the early days of the station. A locomotive engineer was hired because it was believed he wouldn't be scared easily. One evening, there was a sudden burst of flames and a splattering, sizzling noise due to a short-circuit on the copper mains in the station. The fireman ducked behind the boiler while the engineer jumped out of the window. Mr. Sprague quickly identified the problem, cut off the current, and stopped the engine.
Mr. Jenks relates another humorous incident in connection with this plant: "One night I heard a knock at the office door, and on opening it saw two well-dressed ladies, who asked if they might be shown through. I invited them in, taking them first to the boiler-room, where I showed them the coal-pile, explaining that this was used to generate steam in the boiler. We then went to the dynamo-room, where I pointed out the machines converting the steam-power into electricity, appearing later in the form of light in the lamps. After that they were shown the meters by which the consumption of current was measured. They appeared to be interested, and I proceeded to enter upon a comparison of coal made into gas or burned under a boiler to be converted into electricity. The ladies thanked me effusively and brought their visit to a close. As they were about to go through the door, one of them turned to me and said: 'We have enjoyed this visit very much, but there is one question we would like to ask: What is it that you make here?'"
Mr. Jenks shares another funny story related to this plant: "One night, I heard a knock on the office door, and when I opened it, I saw two well-dressed women who asked if they could take a look around. I invited them in and first took them to the boiler room, where I showed them the coal pile, explaining that it was used to generate steam for the boiler. We then went to the dynamo room, where I pointed out the machines that convert the steam power into electricity, which later lights up the lamps. After that, I showed them the meters that measure the current consumption. They seemed interested, so I went on to compare coal made into gas or burned under a boiler to be turned into electricity. The women thanked me warmly and wrapped up their visit. As they were about to leave, one of them turned to me and said, 'We really enjoyed this visit, but we have one question: What is it that you make here?'"
The Brockton station was for a long time a show plant of the Edison company, and had many distinguished visitors, among them being Prof. Elihu Thomson, who was present at the opening, and Sir W. H. Preece, of London. The engineering methods pursued formed the basis of similar installations in Lawrence, Massachusetts, in November, 1883; in Fall River, Massachusetts, in December, 1883; and in Newburgh, New York, the following spring.
The Brockton station was, for a long time, a showcase facility of the Edison company and hosted many notable visitors, including Prof. Elihu Thomson, who attended the opening, and Sir W. H. Preece from London. The engineering techniques used here laid the groundwork for similar setups in Lawrence, Massachusetts, in November 1883; in Fall River, Massachusetts, in December 1883; and in Newburgh, New York, the following spring.
Another important plant of this period deserves special mention, as it was the pioneer in the lighting of large spaces by incandescent lamps. This installation of five thousand lamps on the three-wire system was made to illuminate the buildings at the Louisville, Kentucky, Exposition in 1883, and, owing to the careful surveys, calculations, and preparations of H. M. Byllesby and the late Luther Stieringer, was completed and in operation within six weeks after the placing of the order. The Jury of Awards, in presenting four medals to the Edison company, took occasion to pay a high compliment to the efficiency of the system. It has been thought by many that the magnificent success of this plant did more to stimulate the growth of the incandescent lighting business than any other event in the history of the Edison company. It was literally the beginning of the electrical illumination of American Expositions, carried later to such splendid displays as those of the Chicago World's Fair in 1893, Buffalo in 1901, and St. Louis in 1904.
Another important plant from this time deserves special mention because it was the first to light large spaces using incandescent lamps. This installation of five thousand lamps on a three-wire system was set up to illuminate the buildings at the Louisville, Kentucky, Exposition in 1883. Thanks to the careful surveys, calculations, and preparations by H. M. Byllesby and the late Luther Stieringer, it was completed and operational within six weeks after the order was placed. The Jury of Awards awarded four medals to the Edison company and praised the efficiency of the system. Many believe that the impressive success of this plant did more to boost the growth of the incandescent lighting industry than any other event in the history of the Edison company. It truly marked the beginning of electrical illumination at American Expositions, leading to spectacular displays at the Chicago World's Fair in 1893, Buffalo in 1901, and St. Louis in 1904.
Thus the art was set going in the United States under many difficulties, but with every sign of coming triumph. Reference has already been made to the work abroad in Paris and London. The first permanent Edison station in Europe was that at Milan, Italy, for which the order was given as early as May, 1882, by an enterprising syndicate. Less than a year later, March 3, 1883, the installation was ready and was put in operation, the Theatre Santa Radegonda having been pulled down and a new central-station building erected in its place—probably the first edifice constructed in Europe for the specific purpose of incandescent lighting. Here "Jumbos" were installed from time to time, until at last there were no fewer than ten of them; and current was furnished to customers with a total of nearly ten thousand lamps connected to the mains. This pioneer system was operated continuously until February 9, 1900, or for a period of about seventeen years, when the sturdy old machines, still in excellent condition, were put out of service, so that a larger plant could be installed to meet the demand. This new plant takes high-tension polyphase current from a water-power thirty or forty miles away at Paderno, on the river Adda, flowing from the Apennines; but delivers low-tension direct current for distribution to the regular Edison three-wire system throughout Milan.
The art started to take off in the United States despite many challenges, but with every indication of future success. There has already been mention of work in Paris and London. The first permanent Edison station in Europe was established in Milan, Italy, where an order was placed as early as May 1882 by a group of enterprising investors. Less than a year later, on March 3, 1883, the installation was ready and began operations, with the Theatre Santa Radegonda being torn down and a new central-station building constructed in its place—likely the first building in Europe specifically designed for incandescent lighting. Here, "Jumbos" were installed over time, eventually totaling ten; the system provided power to customers with almost ten thousand lamps connected to the mains. This pioneering system ran continuously until February 9, 1900, for about seventeen years, when the reliable old machines, still in great condition, were retired to make way for a larger plant to accommodate growing demand. This new facility draws high-tension polyphase current from a hydroelectric source thirty or forty miles away at Paderno, along the river Adda, which flows from the Apennines; however, it supplies low-tension direct current for the regular Edison three-wire system throughout Milan.
About the same time that southern Europe was thus opened up to the new system, South America came into line, and the first Edison central station there was installed at Santiago, Chile, in the summer of 1883, under the supervision of Mr. W. N. Stewart. This was the result of the success obtained with small isolated plants, leading to the formation of an Edison company. It can readily be conceived that at such an extreme distance from the source of supply of apparatus the plant was subject to many peculiar difficulties from the outset, of which Mr. Stewart speaks as follows: "I made an exhibition of the 'Jumbo' in the theatre at Santiago, and on the first evening, when it was filled with the aristocracy of the city, I discovered to my horror that the binding wire around the armature was slowly stripping off and going to pieces. We had no means of boring out the field magnets, and we cut grooves in them. I think the machine is still running (1907). The station went into operation soon after with an equipment of eight Edison 'K' dynamos with certain conditions inimical to efficiency, but which have not hindered the splendid expansion of the local system. With those eight dynamos we had four belts between each engine and the dynamo. The steam pressure was limited to seventy-five pounds per square inch. We had two-wire underground feeders, sent without any plans or specifications for their installation. The station had neither voltmeter nor ammeter. The current pressure was regulated by a galvanometer. We were using coal costing $12 a ton, and were paid for our light in currency worth fifty cents on the dollar. The only thing I can be proud of in connection with the plant is the fact that I did not design it, that once in a while we made out to pay its operating expenses, and that occasionally we could run it for three months without a total breakdown."
Around the same time that southern Europe was being introduced to the new system, South America followed suit, with the first Edison central station being set up in Santiago, Chile, in the summer of 1883, overseen by Mr. W. N. Stewart. This was the result of the success achieved with small, isolated plants, which led to the creation of an Edison company. It’s easy to imagine that, being so far from the source of equipment, the plant faced many unique challenges from the start. Mr. Stewart described one such incident: “I showcased the 'Jumbo' at the theater in Santiago, and on the first night, with the city's elite in attendance, I was horrified to find that the binding wire around the armature was slowly coming off and falling apart. We had no way to bore out the field magnets, so we cut grooves in them. I believe the machine is still running (1907). The station started operating shortly after with eight Edison 'K' dynamos, under conditions that were not ideal for efficiency, but despite that, the local system has expanded magnificently. With those eight dynamos, we had four belts connecting each engine to the dynamo. The steam pressure was capped at seventy-five pounds per square inch. We had two-wire underground feeders installed without any plans or specifications. The station didn’t have either a voltmeter or an ammeter. The current pressure was managed by a galvanometer. We were using coal that cost $12 per ton, and we were paid for our electricity in currency worth fifty cents on the dollar. The only things I can take pride in regarding the plant are that I didn’t design it, that we sometimes managed to cover the operating costs, and that occasionally, we could run it for three months without a complete failure.”
It was not until 1885 that the first Edison station in Germany was established; but the art was still very young, and the plant represented pioneer lighting practice in the Empire. The station at Berlin comprised five boilers, and six vertical steam-engines driving by belts twelve Edison dynamos, each of about fifty-five horse-power capacity. A model of this station is preserved in the Deutschen Museum at Munich. In the bulletin of the Berlin Electricity Works for May, 1908, it is said with regard to the events that led up to the creation of the system, as noted already at the Rathenau celebration: "The year 1881 was a mile-stone in the history of the Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. The International Electrical Exposition at Paris was intended to place before the eyes of the civilized world the achievements of the century. Among the exhibits of that Exposition was the Edison system of incandescent lighting. IT BECAME THE BASIS OF MODERN HEAVY CURRENT TECHNICS." The last phrase is italicized as being a happy and authoritative description, as well as a tribute.
It wasn’t until 1885 that the first Edison station in Germany was set up, but the technology was still quite new, representing pioneering lighting practices in the Empire. The station in Berlin included five boilers and six vertical steam engines driving twelve Edison dynamos, each with a capacity of about fifty-five horsepower. A model of this station is displayed in the Deutschen Museum in Munich. In the bulletin of the Berlin Electricity Works from May 1908, it is mentioned regarding the events leading to the creation of the system, as noted during the Rathenau celebration: "The year 1881 was a milestone in the history of the Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. The International Electrical Exposition in Paris aimed to showcase the achievements of the century to the civilized world. Among the exhibits at that Exposition was the Edison system of incandescent lighting. IT BECAME THE BASIS OF MODERN HEAVY CURRENT TECHNICS." The last phrase is italicized as a fitting and authoritative description, as well as a tribute.
This chapter would not be complete if it failed to include some reference to a few of the earlier isolated plants of a historic character. Note has already been made of the first Edison plants afloat on the Jeannette and Columbia, and the first commercial plant in the New York lithographic establishment. The first mill plant was placed in the woollen factory of James Harrison at Newburgh, New York, about September 15, 1881. A year later, Mr. Harrison wrote with some pride: "I believe my mill was the first lighted with your electric light, and therefore may be called No. 1. Besides being job No. 1 it is a No. 1 job, and a No. 1 light, being better and cheaper than gas and absolutely safe as to fire." The first steam-yacht lighted by incandescent lamps was James Gordon Bennett's Namouna, equipped early in 1882 with a plant for one hundred and twenty lamps of eight candlepower, which remained in use there many years afterward.
This chapter wouldn’t be complete without mentioning a few of the early historic plants. We've already talked about the first Edison plants aboard the Jeannette and Columbia, as well as the first commercial plant in the New York lithographic establishment. The first mill plant was installed in James Harrison’s woolen factory in Newburgh, New York, around September 15, 1881. A year later, Mr. Harrison proudly wrote: "I believe my mill was the first to be lit with your electric light, so it can be called No. 1. Besides being job No. 1, it’s a great job and a great light, being better and cheaper than gas and completely safe from fire." The first steam yacht to be lit by incandescent lamps was James Gordon Bennett's Namouna, which was fitted in early 1882 with a system for one hundred and twenty lamps of eight candlepower, and it continued to be used there for many years afterward.
The first Edison plant in a hotel was started in October, 1881, at the Blue Mountain House in the Adirondacks, and consisted of two "Z" dynamos with a complement of eight and sixteen candle lamps. The hotel is situated at an elevation of thirty-five hundred feet above the sea, and was at that time forty miles from the railroad. The machinery was taken up in pieces on the backs of mules from the foot of the mountain. The boilers were fired by wood, as the economical transportation of coal was a physical impossibility. For a six-hour run of the plant one-quarter of a cord of wood was required, at a cost of twenty-five cents per cord.
The first Edison plant in a hotel began in October 1881 at the Blue Mountain House in the Adirondacks. It consisted of two "Z" dynamos and used a total of eight and sixteen candle lamps. The hotel is located at an elevation of 3,500 feet above sea level, and back then, it was forty miles away from the nearest railroad. The machinery was carried up in pieces on the backs of mules from the foot of the mountain. The boilers were powered by wood since transporting coal economically was impossible. To run the plant for six hours, a quarter of a cord of wood was needed, costing twenty-five cents per cord.
The first theatre in the United States to be lighted by an Edison isolated plant was the Bijou Theatre, Boston. The installation of boilers, engines, dynamos, wiring, switches, fixtures, three stage regulators, and six hundred and fifty lamps, was completed in eleven days after receipt of the order, and the plant was successfully operated at the opening of the theatre, on December 12, 1882.
The first theater in the United States to be powered by an Edison isolated plant was the Bijou Theatre in Boston. The installation of boilers, engines, dynamos, wiring, switches, fixtures, three stage regulators, and six hundred and fifty lamps was completed in just eleven days after the order was received, and the system was successfully running by the theater's opening on December 12, 1882.
The first plant to be placed on a United States steamship was the one consisting of an Edison "Z" dynamo and one hundred and twenty eight-candle lamps installed on the Fish Commission's steamer Albatross in 1883. The most interesting feature of this installation was the employment of special deep-sea lamps, supplied with current through a cable nine hundred and forty feet in length, for the purpose of alluring fish. By means of the brilliancy of the lamps marine animals in the lower depths were attracted and then easily ensnared.
The first plant installed on a United States steamship was an Edison "Z" dynamo with one hundred and twenty eight-candle lamps, set up on the Fish Commission's steamer Albatross in 1883. The most interesting part of this setup was the use of special deep-sea lamps, powered through a cable that was nine hundred and forty feet long, designed to attract fish. The brightness of the lamps lured marine animals from the depths, making them easier to catch.
CHAPTER XVIII
THE ELECTRIC RAILWAY
EDISON had no sooner designed his dynamo in 1879 than he adopted the same form of machine for use as a motor. The two are shown in the Scientific American of October 18, 1879, and are alike, except that the dynamo is vertical and the motor lies in a horizontal position, the article remarking: "Its construction differs but slightly from the electric generator." This was but an evidence of his early appreciation of the importance of electricity as a motive power; but it will probably surprise many people to know that he was the inventor of an electric motor before he perfected his incandescent lamp. His interest in the subject went back to his connection with General Lefferts in the days of the evolution of the stock ticker. While Edison was carrying on his shop at Newark, New Jersey, there was considerable excitement in electrical circles over the Payne motor, in regard to the alleged performance of which Governor Cornell of New York and other wealthy capitalists were quite enthusiastic. Payne had a shop in Newark, and in one small room was the motor, weighing perhaps six hundred pounds. It was of circular form, incased in iron, with the ends of several small magnets sticking through the floor. A pulley and belt, connected to a circular saw larger than the motor, permitted large logs of oak timber to be sawed with ease with the use of two small cells of battery. Edison's friend, General Lefferts, had become excited and was determined to invest a large sum of money in the motor company, but knowing Edison's intimate familiarity with all electrical subjects he was wise enough to ask his young expert to go and see the motor with him. At an appointed hour Edison went to the office of the motor company and found there the venerable Professor Morse, Governor Cornell, General Lefferts, and many others who had been invited to witness a performance of the motor. They all proceeded to the room where the motor was at work. Payne put a wire in the binding-post of the battery, the motor started, and an assistant began sawing a heavy oak log. It worked beautifully, and so great was the power developed, apparently, from the small battery, that Morse exclaimed: "I am thankful that I have lived to see this day." But Edison kept a close watch on the motor. The results were so foreign to his experience that he knew there was a trick in it. He soon discovered it. While holding his hand on the frame of the motor he noticed a tremble coincident with the exhaust of an engine across the alleyway, and he then knew that the power came from the engine by a belt under the floor, shifted on and off by a magnet, the other magnets being a blind. He whispered to the General to put his hand on the frame of the motor, watch the exhaust, and note the coincident tremor. The General did so, and in about fifteen seconds he said: "Well, Edison, I must go now. This thing is a fraud." And thus he saved his money, although others not so shrewdly advised were easily persuaded to invest by such a demonstration.
EDISON designed his dynamo in 1879 and quickly adapted the same machine to use as a motor. The two are featured in the Scientific American from October 18, 1879, and they look similar, except the dynamo is vertical while the motor is horizontal. The article notes, "Its construction differs but slightly from the electric generator." This showed his early understanding of electricity's significance as a power source. Many might be surprised to learn that he invented an electric motor before perfecting his incandescent lamp. His interest in the subject began during his collaboration with General Lefferts when the stock ticker was evolving. While Edison was working at his shop in Newark, New Jersey, there was a lot of excitement in electrical circles about the Payne motor, which had gained the enthusiastic support of Governor Cornell of New York and other wealthy investors. Payne had a workshop in Newark, and in one small room was the motor, weighing around six hundred pounds. It was circular, encased in iron, with the ends of several small magnets sticking out of the floor. A pulley and belt connected it to a circular saw larger than the motor, enabling large oak logs to be sawed easily with just two small battery cells. Edison's friend, General Lefferts, got excited and was eager to invest a significant amount in the motor company, but knowing Edison was well-versed in all things electrical, he wisely asked his young expert to join him in checking out the motor. At the scheduled time, Edison went to the motor company's office and found the distinguished Professor Morse, Governor Cornell, General Lefferts, and several others who had been invited to see the motor in action. They all went to the room where the motor was operating. Payne connected a wire to the battery, the motor started, and an assistant began sawing a heavy oak log. It worked flawlessly, and the power generated from the small battery was so impressive that Morse exclaimed, "I'm grateful to have witnessed this day." But Edison kept a keen eye on the motor. The results were so unusual compared to his experience that he sensed there was a trick involved. He quickly figured it out. While resting his hand on the motor's frame, he felt a tremor that coincided with the exhaust of a nearby engine, leading him to realize that the power was coming from that engine via a belt hidden under the floor, controlled by a magnet, with the other magnets being a decoy. He whispered to the General to place his hand on the motor's frame, observe the exhaust, and notice the corresponding tremor. The General did so, and after about fifteen seconds, he said, "Well, Edison, I have to leave now. This thing is a fraud." And that’s how he saved his money, while others, less astute, were easily convinced to invest based on the demonstration.
A few years later, in 1878, Edison went to Wyoming with a group of astronomers, to test his tasimeter during an eclipse of the sun, and saw the land white to harvest. He noticed the long hauls to market or elevator that the farmers had to make with their loads of grain at great expense, and conceived the idea that as ordinary steam-railroad service was too costly, light electric railways might be constructed that could be operated automatically over simple tracks, the propelling motors being controlled at various points. Cheap to build and cheap to maintain, such roads would be a great boon to the newer farming regions of the West, where the highways were still of the crudest character, and where transportation was the gravest difficulty with which the settlers had to contend. The plan seems to have haunted him, and he had no sooner worked out a generator and motor that owing to their low internal resistance could be operated efficiently, than he turned his hand to the practical trial of such a railroad, applicable to both the haulage of freight and the transportation of passengers. Early in 1880, when the tremendous rush of work involved in the invention of the incandescent lamp intermitted a little, he began the construction of a stretch of track close to the Menlo Park laboratory, and at the same time built an electric locomotive to operate over it.
A few years later, in 1878, Edison traveled to Wyoming with a group of astronomers to test his tasimeter during a solar eclipse and saw the fields ready for harvest. He observed the long trips farmers had to take to market or elevators with their loads of grain, which were very expensive, and came up with the idea that since ordinary steam railroad service was too costly, light electric railways could be built that would run automatically on simple tracks, with the motors controlled from various points. Cheap to construct and easy to maintain, these railways would be a huge help to the newer farming areas in the West, where the roads were still very basic and transportation was the biggest challenge the settlers faced. The idea seemed to stick with him, and as soon as he developed a generator and motor that could operate efficiently due to their low internal resistance, he set out to practically test such a railroad, suitable for both freight and passenger transport. Early in 1880, when the intense work required to invent the incandescent lamp slowed down a little, he started building a stretch of track near the Menlo Park laboratory and also constructed an electric locomotive to run on it.
This is a fitting stage at which to review briefly what had been done in electric traction up to that date. There was absolutely no art, but there had been a number of sporadic and very interesting experiments made. The honor of the first attempt of any kind appears to rest with this country and with Thomas Davenport, a self-trained blacksmith, of Brandon, Vermont, who made a small model of a circular electric railway and cars in 1834, and exhibited it the following year in Springfield, Boston, and other cities. Of course he depended upon batteries for current, but the fundamental idea was embodied of using the track for the circuit, one rail being positive and the other negative, and the motor being placed across or between them in multiple arc to receive the current. Such are also practically the methods of to-day. The little model was in good preservation up to the year 1900, when, being shipped to the Paris Exposition, it was lost, the steamer that carried it foundering in mid-ocean. The very broad patent taken out by this simple mechanic, so far ahead of his times, was the first one issued in America for an electric motor. Davenport was also the first man to apply electric power to the printing-press, in 1840. In his traction work he had a close second in Robert Davidson, of Aberdeen, Scotland, who in 1839 operated both a lathe and a small locomotive with the motor he had invented. His was the credit of first actually carrying passengers—two at a time, over a rough plank road—while it is said that his was the first motor to be tried on real tracks, those of the Edinburgh-Glasgow road, making a speed of four miles an hour.
This is a good point to briefly review what had been accomplished in electric traction up to that time. There was no established art, but there had been several interesting and scattered experiments. The distinction of the first attempt seems to go to this country and Thomas Davenport, a self-taught blacksmith from Brandon, Vermont, who created a small model of a circular electric railway and cars in 1834 and showcased it the following year in Springfield, Boston, and other cities. Of course, he relied on batteries for power, but the core idea was to use the track as part of the circuit, with one rail being positive and the other negative, positioning the motor across or between them in multiple arcs to draw the current. These methods are still essentially in use today. The little model remained well-preserved until 1900 when it was shipped to the Paris Exposition and was lost after the steamer carrying it sank in the ocean. The broad patent obtained by this innovative mechanic, ahead of his time, was the first issued in America for an electric motor. Davenport was also the first person to use electric power for a printing press in 1840. In his traction efforts, he was closely followed by Robert Davidson from Aberdeen, Scotland, who, in 1839, operated a lathe and a small locomotive using the motor he invented. Davidson is credited with being the first to actually transport passengers—two at a time—over a rough plank road, and his was reportedly the first motor tested on real tracks, specifically the Edinburgh-Glasgow line, achieving a speed of four miles an hour.
The curse of this work and of all that succeeded it for a score of years was the necessity of depending upon chemical batteries for current, the machine usually being self-contained and hauling the batteries along with itself, as in the case of the famous Page experiments in April, 1851, when a speed of nineteen miles an hour was attained on the line of the Washington & Baltimore road. To this unfruitful period belonged, however, the crude idea of taking the current from a stationary source of power by means of an overhead contact, which has found its practical evolution in the modern ubiquitous trolley; although the patent for this, based on his caveat of 1879, was granted several years later than that to Stephen D. Field, for the combination of an electric motor operated by means of a current from a stationary dynamo or source of electricity conducted through the rails. As a matter of fact, in 1856 and again in 1875, George F. Green, a jobbing machinist, of Kalamazoo, Michigan, built small cars and tracks to which current was fed from a distant battery, enough energy being utilized to haul one hundred pounds of freight or one passenger up and down a "road" two hundred feet long. All the work prior to the development of the dynamo as a source of current was sporadic and spasmodic, and cannot be said to have left any trace on the art, though it offered many suggestions as to operative methods.
The curse of this work and all that followed for twenty years was the need to rely on chemical batteries for power. The machine was usually self-contained, carrying the batteries with it, as seen in the famous Page experiments in April 1851, when a speed of nineteen miles per hour was achieved on the Washington & Baltimore line. However, during this unproductive time, there was a rough idea of getting power from a stationary source using an overhead contact, which has evolved into the modern trolley system. Although the patent for this, based on his caveat from 1879, was granted several years after Stephen D. Field's patent for an electric motor powered by a current from a stationary dynamo or electricity source conducted through the rails. In fact, in 1856 and again in 1875, George F. Green, a machinist from Kalamazoo, Michigan, created small cars and tracks that received power from a distant battery, utilizing enough energy to haul a hundred pounds of freight or one passenger along a "road" two hundred feet long. All the efforts before the dynamo was developed as a current source were irregular and erratic, and they didn’t leave a lasting impact on the field, though they provided many ideas for operational methods.
The close of the same decade of the nineteenth century that saw the electric light brought to perfection, saw also the realization in practice of all the hopes of fifty years as to electric traction. Both utilizations depended upon the supply of current now cheaply obtainable from the dynamo. These arts were indeed twins, feeding at inexhaustible breasts. In 1879, at the Berlin Exhibition, the distinguished firm of Siemens, to whose ingenuity and enterprise electrical development owes so much, installed a road about one-third of a mile in length, over which the locomotive hauled a train of three small cars at a speed of about eight miles an hour, carrying some twenty persons every trip. Current was fed from a dynamo to the motor through a central third rail, the two outer rails being joined together as the negative or return circuit. Primitive but essentially successful, this little road made a profound impression on the minds of many inventors and engineers, and marked the real beginning of the great new era, which has already seen electricity applied to the operation of main lines of trunk railways. But it is not to be supposed that on the part of the public there was any great amount of faith then discernible; and for some years the pioneers had great difficulty, especially in this country, in raising money for their early modest experiments. Of the general conditions at this moment Frank J. Sprague says in an article in the Century Magazine of July, 1905, on the creation of the new art: "Edison was perhaps nearer the verge of great electric-railway possibilities than any other American. In the face of much adverse criticism he had developed the essentials of the low-internal-resistance dynamo with high-resistance field, and many of the essential features of multiple-arc distribution, and in 1880 he built a small road at his laboratory at Menlo Park."
At the end of the same decade in the nineteenth century that perfected electric light, the dreams of fifty years regarding electric traction also became a reality. Both uses relied on the now affordable supply of current from the dynamo. These technologies were truly twins, drawing from an endless source. In 1879, at the Berlin Exhibition, the renowned company Siemens, whose creativity and ambition contributed significantly to electrical progress, set up a track about one-third of a mile long. A locomotive pulled a train of three small cars at a speed of around eight miles per hour, carrying about twenty people each trip. Current was supplied from a dynamo to the motor through a central third rail, with the two outer rails acting as the negative or return circuit. Simple yet fundamentally successful, this small railway made a lasting impression on many inventors and engineers, marking the genuine start of a new era, which has since seen electricity utilized for the operation of major trunk railways. However, it would be incorrect to assume there was considerable public faith at that time; for several years, pioneers faced significant challenges, especially in this country, in securing funds for their early modest projects. Regarding the general conditions of this period, Frank J. Sprague remarked in a July 1905 article in Century Magazine about the creation of this new field: "Edison was probably closer to unlocking the vast electric-railway potential than any other American. Despite much criticism, he developed the key aspects of the low-internal-resistance dynamo with a high-resistance field, and many crucial features of multiple-arc distribution, and in 1880, he constructed a small railway at his laboratory in Menlo Park."
On May 13th of the year named this interesting road went into operation as the result of hard and hurried work of preparation during the spring months. The first track was about a third of a mile in length, starting from the shops, following a country road, passing around a hill at the rear and curving home, in the general form of the letter "U." The rails were very light. Charles T. Hughes, who went with Edison in 1879, and was in charge of much of the work, states that they were "second" street-car rails, insulated with tar canvas paper and things of that sort—"asphalt." They were spiked down on ordinary sleepers laid upon the natural grade, and the gauge was about three feet six inches. At one point the grade dropped some sixty feet in a distance of three hundred, and the curves were of recklessly short radius. The dynamos supplying current to the road were originally two of the standard size "Z" machines then being made at the laboratory, popularly known throughout the Edison ranks as "Longwaisted Mary Anns," and the circuits from these were carried out to the rails by underground conductors. They were not large—about twelve horse-power each—generating seventy-five amperes of current at one hundred and ten volts, so that not quite twenty-five horse-power of electrical energy was available for propulsion.
On May 13th of that year, this fascinating road began operations as a result of intense and rushed preparations throughout the spring months. The first track was about a third of a mile long, starting from the shops, following a country road, looping around a hill in the back, and curving home in a shape similar to the letter "U." The rails were quite lightweight. Charles T. Hughes, who worked with Edison in 1879 and was responsible for much of the construction, mentioned that they used "second" streetcar rails, insulated with tar canvas paper and similar materials—"asphalt." They were secured onto regular sleepers placed on the natural grade, with a gauge of approximately three feet six inches. At one section, the grade dropped around sixty feet over three hundred feet, and the curves had a dangerously short radius. The dynamos providing power to the road were originally two standard "Z" machines being manufactured at the laboratory, commonly referred to among Edison employees as "Longwaisted Mary Anns," and the circuits from these were routed to the rails via underground conductors. They weren't very powerful—about twelve horsepower each—producing seventy-five amperes of current at one hundred and ten volts, so there was just under twenty-five horsepower of electrical energy available for propulsion.
The locomotive built while the roadbed was getting ready was a four-wheeled iron truck, an ordinary flat dump-car about six feet long and four feet wide, upon which was mounted a "Z" dynamo used as a motor, so that it had a capacity of about twelve horsepower. This machine was laid on its side, with the armature end coming out at the front of the locomotive, and the motive power was applied to the driving-axle by a cumbersome series of friction pulleys. Each wheel of the locomotive had a metal rim and a centre web of wood or papier-mache, and the current picked up by one set of wheels was carried through contact brushes and a brass hub to the motor; the circuit back to the track, or other rail, being closed through the other wheels in a similar manner. The motor had its field-magnet circuit in permanent connection as a shunt across the rails, protected by a crude bare copper-wire safety-catch. A switch in the armature circuit enabled the motorman to reverse the direction of travel by reversing the current flow through the armature coils.
The locomotive built while the roadbed was getting ready was a four-wheeled iron truck, a standard flat dump car about six feet long and four feet wide, with a "Z" dynamo used as a motor, giving it a capacity of about twelve horsepower. This machine was positioned on its side, with the armature end sticking out at the front of the locomotive, and the power was delivered to the driving axle through a complicated system of friction pulleys. Each wheel of the locomotive had a metal rim and a center made of wood or papier-mâché, and the current collected by one set of wheels was transferred through contact brushes and a brass hub to the motor; the circuit back to the track or other rail was completed through the other wheels in a similar way. The motor had its field-magnet circuit permanently connected as a shunt across the rails, protected by a makeshift bare copper-wire safety catch. A switch in the armature circuit allowed the motorman to reverse the direction of travel by changing the current flow through the armature coils.
Things went fairly well for a time on that memorable Thursday afternoon, when all the laboratory force made high holiday and scrambled for foothold on the locomotive for a trip; but the friction gearing was not equal to the sudden strain put upon it during one run and went to pieces. Some years later, also, Daft again tried friction gear in his historical experiments on the Manhattan Elevated road, but the results were attended with no greater success. The next resort of Edison was to belts, the armature shafting belted to a countershaft on the locomotive frame, and the countershaft belted to a pulley on the car-axle. The lever which threw the former friction gear into adjustment was made to operate an idler pulley for tightening the axle-belt. When the motor was started, the armature was brought up to full revolution and then the belt was tightened on the car-axle, compelling motion of the locomotive. But the belts were liable to slip a great deal in the process, and the chafing of the belts charred them badly. If that did not happen, and if the belt was made taut suddenly, the armature burned out—which it did with disconcerting frequency. The next step was to use a number of resistance-boxes in series with the armature, so that the locomotive could start with those in circuit, and then the motorman could bring it up to speed gradually by cutting one box out after the other. To stop the locomotive, the armature circuit was opened by the main switch, stopping the flow of current, and then brakes were applied by long levers. Matters generally and the motors in particular went much better, even if the locomotive was so freely festooned with resistance-boxes all of perceptible weight and occupying much of the limited space. These details show forcibly and typically the painful steps of advance that every inventor in this new field had to make in the effort to reach not alone commercial practicability, but mechanical feasibility. It was all empirical enough; but that was the only way open even to the highest talent.
Things went pretty well for a while on that memorable Thursday afternoon, when the entire lab crew celebrated and scrambled to get on the locomotive for a trip; however, the friction gearing couldn't handle the sudden strain during one run and broke down. A few years later, Daft attempted to use friction gear again in his historic experiments on the Manhattan Elevated railway, but the results weren’t any better. Edison's next move was to use belts, with the armature shaft connected to a countershaft on the locomotive frame, and the countershaft linked to a pulley on the car axle. The lever that adjusted the previous friction gear was modified to operate an idler pulley, which tightened the axle belt. When the motor was started, the armature reached full speed, and then the belt was tightened on the car axle, setting the locomotive in motion. However, the belts tended to slip a lot during this process, and the rubbing caused them to wear out quickly. If that didn't happen, and the belt was suddenly tightened, the armature would often burn out—which occurred quite frequently. The next step was to use several resistance boxes in series with the armature, allowing the locomotive to start with these in the circuit, and then the operator could gradually bring it up to speed by removing one box at a time. To stop the locomotive, the armature circuit was opened by the main switch, cutting off the current, and then brakes were applied using long levers. Overall, things improved considerably, even if the locomotive was heavily equipped with resistance boxes that weighed quite a bit and took up much of the limited space. These details starkly illustrate the difficult progress every inventor in this new field had to go through in their quest for not just commercial viability, but also mechanical practicality. It was all quite experimental; but that was the only path available, even for the most talented innovators.
Smugglers landing laces and silks have been known to wind them around their bodies, as being less ostentatious than carrying them in a trunk. Edison thought his resistance-boxes an equally superfluous display, and therefore ingeniously wound some copper resistance wire around one of the legs of the motor field magnet, where it was out of the way, served as a useful extra field coil in starting up the motor, and dismissed most of the boxes back to the laboratory—a few being retained under the seat for chance emergencies. Like the boxes, this coil was in series with the armature, and subject to plugging in and out at will by the motorman. Thus equipped, the locomotive was found quite satisfactory, and long did yeoman service. It was given three cars to pull, one an open awning-car with two park benches placed back to back; one a flat freight-car, and one box-car dubbed the "Pullman," with which Edison illustrated a system of electric braking. Although work had been begun so early in the year, and the road had been operating since May, it was not until July that Edison executed any application for patents on his "electromagnetic railway engine," or his ingenious braking system. Every inventor knows how largely his fate lies in the hands of a competent and alert patent attorney, in both the preparation and the prosecution of his case; and Mr. Sprague is justified in observing in his Century article: "The paucity of controlling claims obtained in these early patents is remarkable." It is notorious that Edison did not then enjoy the skilful aid in safeguarding his ideas that he commanded later.
Smugglers landing lace and silk would often wrap it around their bodies, as it was less flashy than carrying it in a trunk. Edison viewed his resistance boxes as unnecessary, so he cleverly wrapped some copper resistance wire around one of the legs of the motor field magnet. This kept it out of the way, made it a useful extra field coil for starting the motor, and allowed him to send most of the boxes back to the lab—keeping a few under the seat for emergencies. Like the boxes, this coil was connected in series with the armature and could be plugged in and out at will by the motorman. With this setup, the locomotive performed quite well and served reliably for a long time. It was given three cars to pull: an open awning car with two park benches back to back, a flat freight car, and a box car called the "Pullman," which Edison used to demonstrate a system of electric braking. Even though work had started early in the year and the line had been running since May, it wasn’t until July that Edison applied for patents on his "electromagnetic railway engine" and his innovative braking system. Every inventor knows that their success often depends on a skilled and attentive patent attorney during both preparation and pursuit of their case; Mr. Sprague rightly notes in his Century article: "The lack of strong claims in these early patents is striking." It's well-known that Edison didn’t have the expert help to protect his ideas that he later had.
The daily newspapers and technical journals lost no time in bringing the road to public attention, and the New York Herald of June 25th was swift to suggest that here was the locomotive that would be "most pleasing to the average New Yorker, whose head has ached with noise, whose eyes have been filled with dust, or whose clothes have been ruined with oil." A couple of days later, the Daily Graphic illustrated and described the road and published a sketch of a one-hundred-horse-power electric locomotive for the use of the Pennsylvania Railroad between Perth Amboy and Rahway. Visitors, of course, were numerous, including many curious, sceptical railroad managers, few if any of whom except Villard could see the slightest use for the new motive power. There is, perhaps, some excuse for such indifference. No men in the world have more new inventions brought to them than railroad managers, and this was the rankest kind of novelty. It was not, indeed, until a year later, in May, 1881, that the first regular road collecting fares was put in operation—a little stretch of one and a half miles from Berlin to Lichterfelde, with one miniature motorcar. Edison was in reality doing some heavy electric-railway engineering, his apparatus full of ideas, suggestions, prophecies; but to the operators of long trunk lines it must have seemed utterly insignificant and "excellent fooling."
The daily newspapers and technical journals quickly brought the road to public attention, and the New York Herald on June 25th promptly suggested that this was the locomotive that would be "most pleasing to the average New Yorker, who has suffered from noise, has eyes filled with dust, or whose clothes have been ruined by oil." A couple of days later, the Daily Graphic illustrated and described the road and published a sketch of a one-hundred-horsepower electric locomotive intended for the Pennsylvania Railroad between Perth Amboy and Rahway. Visitors were numerous, including many curious but skeptical railroad managers, few of whom, except Villard, could see any real use for the new motive power. There is perhaps some reason for such indifference. No group in the world encounters more new inventions than railroad managers, and this was the most bewildering kind of novelty. In fact, it wasn't until a year later, in May 1881, that the first regular road collecting fares went into operation—a short stretch of one and a half miles from Berlin to Lichterfelde, with one miniature motorcar. Edison was actually engaged in significant electric-railway engineering, with his apparatus filled with ideas, suggestions, and predictions; but to the operators of major trunk lines, it must have seemed utterly insignificant and merely "excellent fooling."
Speaking of this situation, Mr. Edison says: "One day Frank Thomson, the President of the Pennsylvania Railroad, came out to see the electric light and the electric railway in operation. The latter was then about a mile long. He rode on it. At that time I was getting out plans to make an electric locomotive of three hundred horse-power with six-foot drivers, with the idea of showing people that they could dispense with their steam locomotives. Mr. Thomson made the objection that it was impracticable, and that it would be impossible to supplant steam. His great experience and standing threw a wet blanket on my hopes. But I thought he might perhaps be mistaken, as there had been many such instances on record. I continued to work on the plans, and about three years later I started to build the locomotive at the works at Goerck Street, and had it about finished when I was switched off on some other work. One of the reasons why I felt the electric railway to be eminently practical was that Henry Villard, the President of the Northern Pacific, said that one of the greatest things that could be done would be to build right-angle feeders into the wheat-fields of Dakota and bring in the wheat to the main lines, as the farmers then had to draw it from forty to eighty miles. There was a point where it would not pay to raise it at all; and large areas of the country were thus of no value. I conceived the idea of building a very light railroad of narrow gauge, and had got all the data as to the winds on the plains, and found that it would be possible with very large windmills to supply enough power to drive those wheat trains."
Talking about this situation, Mr. Edison says: "One day, Frank Thomson, the President of the Pennsylvania Railroad, came out to see the electric light and the electric railway in action. The railway was about a mile long at the time. He took a ride on it. I was then working on plans for an electric locomotive with three hundred horsepower and six-foot drivers, intending to show people that they could do without their steam locomotives. Mr. Thomson raised the concern that it was impractical and that it would be impossible to replace steam. His vast experience and position really dampened my hopes. But I thought he might be wrong, as there had been many similar situations in history. I kept working on the plans, and about three years later, I began building the locomotive at the factory on Goerck Street. I had it nearly finished when I was redirected to another project. One of the reasons I felt the electric railway was definitely practical was that Henry Villard, the President of the Northern Pacific, mentioned that one of the best things to do would be to create right-angle feeders into the wheat fields of Dakota and transport the wheat to the main lines, since farmers had to haul it from forty to eighty miles away. There were places where it just wasn't economically viable to grow it at all, causing large areas of the country to be effectively worthless. I came up with the idea of building a very light narrow-gauge railroad and gathered data on the wind patterns on the plains, discovering that it would be possible to use very large windmills to generate enough power to operate those wheat trains."
Among others who visited the little road at this juncture were persons interested in the Manhattan Elevated system of New York, on which experiments were repeatedly tried later, but which was not destined to adopt a method so obviously well suited to all the conditions until after many successful demonstrations had been made on elevated roads elsewhere. It must be admitted that Mr. Edison was not very profoundly impressed with the desire entertained in that quarter to utilize any improvement, for he remarks: "When the Elevated Railroad in New York, up Sixth Avenue, was started there was a great clamor about the noise, and injunctions were threatened. The management engaged me to make a report on the cause of the noise. I constructed an instrument that would record the sound, and set out to make a preliminary report, but I found that they never intended to do anything but let the people complain."
Among those who visited the small road at that time were people interested in the Manhattan Elevated system in New York, where experiments were repeatedly conducted later, but it wouldn’t adopt a method that was clearly suitable for all conditions until after many successful demonstrations had taken place on elevated roads elsewhere. It must be said that Mr. Edison wasn’t very impressed by the desire in that area to make use of any improvements, as he noted: “When the Elevated Railroad in New York, up Sixth Avenue, was launched, there was a huge outcry about the noise, and legal actions were threatened. The management hired me to report on the cause of the noise. I built an instrument to record the sound and set out to write a preliminary report, but I found they never intended to do anything except let the people complain.”
It was upon the co-operation of Villard that Edison fell back, and an agreement was entered into between them on September 14, 1881, which provided that the latter would "build two and a half miles of electric railway at Menlo Park, equipped with three cars, two locomotives, one for freight, and one for passengers, capacity of latter sixty miles an hour. Capacity freight engine, ten tons net freight; cost of handling a ton of freight per mile per horse-power to be less than ordinary locomotive.... If experiments are successful, Villard to pay actual outlay in experiments, and to treat with the Light Company for the installation of at least fifty miles of electric railroad in the wheat regions." Mr. Edison is authority for the statement that Mr. Villard advanced between $35,000 and $40,000, and that the work done was very satisfactory; but it did not end at that time in any practical results, as the Northern Pacific went into the hands of a receiver, and Mr. Villard's ability to help was hopelessly crippled. The directors of the Edison Electric Light Company could not be induced to have anything to do with the electric railway, and Mr. Insull states that the money advanced was treated by Mr. Edison as a personal loan and repaid to Mr. Villard, for whom he had a high admiration and a strong feeling of attachment. Mr. Insull says: "Among the financial men whose close personal friendship Edison enjoyed, I would mention Henry Villard, who, I think, had a higher appreciation of the possibilities of the Edison system than probably any other man of his time in Wall Street. He dropped out of the business at the time of the consolidation of the Thomson-Houston Company with the Edison General Electric Company; but from the earliest days of the business, when it was in its experimental period, when the Edison light and power system was but an idea, down to the day of his death, Henry Villard continued a strong supporter not only with his influence, but with his money. He was the first capitalist to back individually Edison's experiments in electric railways."
It was thanks to Villard's cooperation that Edison took a step back, and on September 14, 1881, they reached an agreement stating that Edison would "build two and a half miles of electric railway at Menlo Park, equipped with three cars, two locomotives, one for freight and one for passengers, with the latter capable of reaching sixty miles per hour. The freight engine could handle a net freight capacity of ten tons, and the cost of moving a ton of freight per mile per horsepower had to be less than that of a typical locomotive.... If the experiments were successful, Villard would cover the actual expenses of the experiments and negotiate with the Light Company to install at least fifty miles of electric railroad in the wheat regions." Mr. Edison claims that Mr. Villard advanced between $35,000 and $40,000, and the work completed was quite satisfactory; however, it did not lead to any practical outcomes at that time, as the Northern Pacific went into receivership, crippling Mr. Villard's ability to assist. The directors of the Edison Electric Light Company were not persuaded to engage with the electric railway, and Mr. Insull mentioned that the money advanced was considered by Mr. Edison as a personal loan, which he repaid to Mr. Villard, for whom he had great admiration and attachment. Mr. Insull stated: "Among the financial men with whom Edison shared a close personal friendship, I would mention Henry Villard, who, I believe, recognized the potential of the Edison system more than probably any other person in Wall Street at that time. He stepped away from the business during the consolidation of the Thomson-Houston Company with the Edison General Electric Company; however, from the early days of the business, when it was still in the experimental phase and the Edison light and power system was merely an idea, until the day he died, Henry Villard remained a strong supporter, not only with his influence but also with his financial backing. He was the first investor to personally support Edison's experiments in electric railways."
In speaking of his relationships with Mr. Villard at this time, Edison says: "When Villard was all broken down, and in a stupor caused by his disasters in connection with the Northern Pacific, Mrs. Villard sent for me to come and cheer him up. It was very difficult to rouse him from his despair and apathy, but I talked about the electric light to him, and its development, and told him that it would help him win it all back and put him in his former position. Villard made his great rally; he made money out of the electric light; and he got back control of the Northern Pacific. Under no circumstances can a hustler be kept down. If he is only square, he is bound to get back on his feet. Villard has often been blamed and severely criticised, but he was not the only one to blame. His engineers had spent $20,000,000 too much in building the road, and it was not his fault if he found himself short of money, and at that time unable to raise any more."
When talking about his relationship with Mr. Villard at that time, Edison says: "When Villard was completely broken down and in a stupor due to his failures with the Northern Pacific, Mrs. Villard asked me to come and lift his spirits. It was really hard to get him out of his despair and numbness, but I talked to him about electric light and its potential, telling him it could help him regain everything and return to his previous position. Villard made a significant comeback; he profited from electric light and regained control of the Northern Pacific. A hustler can never be kept down. If he plays fair, he’s bound to get back on his feet. Villard has faced a lot of blame and harsh criticism, but he wasn’t the only one at fault. His engineers had overspent $20 million in building the road, and it wasn’t his fault that he found himself short on funds and unable to raise more money at that time."
Villard maintained his intelligent interest in electric-railway development, with regard to which Edison remarks: "At one time Mr. Villard got the idea that he would run the mountain division of the Northern Pacific Railroad by electricity. He asked me if it could be done. I said: 'Certainly, it is too easy for me to undertake; let some one else do it.' He said: 'I want you to tackle the problem,' and he insisted on it. So I got up a scheme of a third rail and shoe and erected it in my yard here in Orange. When I got it all ready, he had all his division engineers come on to New York, and they came over here. I showed them my plans, and the unanimous decision of the engineers was that it was absolutely and utterly impracticable. That system is on the New York Central now, and was also used on the New Haven road in its first work with electricity."
Villard kept his keen interest in electric railway development, to which Edison commented: "At one point, Mr. Villard thought of running the mountain division of the Northern Pacific Railroad using electricity. He asked me if it was possible. I said: 'Of course, it's too easy for me to take on; let someone else handle it.' He insisted, 'I want you to take on the challenge,' so I created a plan for a third rail and shoe and set it up in my yard here in Orange. Once I had everything ready, he brought all his division engineers to New York, and they came over to my place. I presented my plans, and the unanimous opinion of the engineers was that it was completely and totally impractical. That system is currently used on the New York Central and was also implemented on the New Haven line in its initial work with electricity."
At this point it may be well to cite some other statements of Edison as to kindred work, with which he has not usually been associated in the public mind. "In the same manner I had worked out for the Manhattan Elevated Railroad a system of electric trains, and had the control of each car centred at one place—multiple control. This was afterward worked out and made practical by Frank Sprague. I got up a slot contact for street railways, and have a patent on it—a sliding contact in a slot. Edward Lauterbach was connected with the Third Avenue Railroad in New York—as counsel—and I told him he was making a horrible mistake putting in the cable. I told him to let the cable stand still and send electricity through it, and he would not have to move hundreds of tons of metal all the time. He would rue the day when he put the cable in." It cannot be denied that the prophecy was fulfilled, for the cable was the beginning of the frightful financial collapse of the system, and was torn out in a few years to make way for the triumphant "trolley in the slot."
At this point, it might be helpful to mention some other comments from Edison about related work that he’s not commonly associated with in the public’s mind. "I also developed a system of electric trains for the Manhattan Elevated Railroad, with control of each car centralized in one location—multiple control. This was later implemented and made practical by Frank Sprague. I invented a slot contact for street railways and hold a patent for it—a sliding contact in a slot. Edward Lauterbach was involved with the Third Avenue Railroad in New York as their lawyer, and I warned him that he was making a big mistake by installing the cable. I advised him to keep the cable stationary and send electricity through it, so he wouldn’t have to move hundreds of tons of metal all the time. He would regret the day he put the cable in." It's undeniable that this prediction came true, as the cable marked the start of the disastrous financial downfall of the system and was removed a few years later to make way for the successful "trolley in the slot."
Incidental glimpses of this work are both amusing and interesting. Hughes, who was working on the experimental road with Mr. Edison, tells the following story: "Villard sent J. C. Henderson, one of his mechanical engineers, to see the road when it was in operation, and we went down one day—Edison, Henderson, and I—and went on the locomotive. Edison ran it, and just after we started there was a trestle sixty feet long and seven feet deep, and Edison put on all the power. When we went over it we must have been going forty miles an hour, and I could see the perspiration come out on Henderson. After we got over the trestle and started on down the track, Henderson said: 'When we go back I will walk. If there is any more of that kind of running I won't be in it myself.'" To the correspondence of Grosvenor P. Lowrey we are indebted for a similar reminiscence, under date of June 5, 1880: "Goddard and I have spent a part of the day at Menlo, and all is glorious. I have ridden at forty miles an hour on Mr. Edison's electric railway—and we ran off the track. I protested at the rate of speed over the sharp curves, designed to show the power of the engine, but Edison said they had done it often. Finally, when the last trip was to be taken, I said I did not like it, but would go along. The train jumped the track on a short curve, throwing Kruesi, who was driving the engine, with his face down in the dirt, and another man in a comical somersault through some underbrush. Edison was off in a minute, jumping and laughing, and declaring it a most beautiful accident. Kruesi got up, his face bleeding and a good deal shaken; and I shall never forget the expression of voice and face in which he said, with some foreign accent: 'Oh! yes, pairfeckly safe.' Fortunately no other hurts were suffered, and in a few minutes we had the train on the track and running again."
Incidental glimpses of this work are both entertaining and intriguing. Hughes, who was working on the experimental road with Mr. Edison, shares the following story: "Villard sent J. C. Henderson, one of his mechanical engineers, to see the road in action, and one day we went down—Edison, Henderson, and I—and hopped on the locomotive. Edison was in control, and just after we started, there was a trestle sixty feet long and seven feet deep, and Edison cranked up all the power. When we went over it, we must have been going forty miles an hour, and I could see the sweat pouring off Henderson. After we got over the trestle and continued down the track, Henderson said, 'When we go back, I'm walking. If there's any more of that kind of speed, I'm not getting back on it myself.'" Thanks to Grosvenor P. Lowrey's correspondence, we have a similar memory, dated June 5, 1880: "Goddard and I spent part of the day at Menlo, and everything is fantastic. I rode at forty miles an hour on Mr. Edison's electric railway—and we derailed. I voiced my concerns about the speed over the sharp turns, which were meant to showcase the engine's power, but Edison insisted they had done it many times. Finally, when it was time for the last ride, I mentioned I didn’t like it, but would go along. The train derailed on a short curve, throwing Kruesi, who was driving the engine, face down into the dirt, and sending another guy into a funny somersault through some bushes. Edison was up in a moment, jumping and laughing, calling it a beautiful accident. Kruesi got up, his face bloodied and really shaken, and I’ll never forget the way he said, with a bit of an accent, 'Oh! yes, perfectly safe.' Luckily, no one else was hurt, and in a few minutes, we had the train back on the track and running again."
All this rough-and-ready dealing with grades and curves was not mere horse-play, but had a serious purpose underlying it, every trip having its record as to some feature of defect or improvement. One particular set of experiments relating to such work was made on behalf of visitors from South America, and were doubtless the first tests of the kind made for that continent, where now many fine electric street and interurban railway systems are in operation. Mr. Edison himself supplies the following data: "During the electric-railway experiments at Menlo Park, we had a short spur of track up one of the steep gullies. The experiment came about in this way. Bogota, the capital of Columbia, is reached on muleback—or was—from Honda on the headwaters of the Magdalena River. There were parties who wanted to know if transportation over the mule route could not be done by electricity. They said the grades were excessive, and it would cost too much to do it with steam locomotives, even if they could climb the grades. I said: 'Well, it can't be much more than 45 per cent.; we will try that first. If it will do that it will do anything else.' I started at 45 per cent. I got up an electric locomotive with a grip on the rail by which it went up the 45 per cent. grade. Then they said the curves were very short. I put the curves in. We started the locomotive with nobody on it, and got up to twenty miles an hour, taking those curves of very short radius; but it was weeks before we could prevent it from running off. We had to bank the tracks up to an angle of thirty degrees before we could turn the curve and stay on. These Spanish parties were perfectly satisfied we could put in an electric railway from Honda to Bogota successfully, and then they disappeared. I have never seen them since. As usual, I paid for the experiment."
All this straightforward work with grades and curves wasn’t just play; it had a serious purpose behind it, with each trip documenting some aspect of defect or improvement. A specific set of experiments related to this project was conducted for visitors from South America, and they were probably the first tests of this kind done for that continent, where many excellent electric street and interurban railway systems are now in operation. Mr. Edison himself provides the following details: "During the electric railway experiments at Menlo Park, we had a short spur of track up one of the steep gullies. Here’s how the experiment came about. Bogotá, the capital of Colombia, used to be reached on muleback—from Honda on the headwaters of the Magdalena River. There were groups interested in whether transportation over the mule route could be done with electricity. They claimed the grades were too steep, and that it would be too expensive to use steam locomotives, even if they could manage the grades. I said: 'Well, it can’t be much more than 45 percent; we’ll try that first. If it can handle that, it can handle anything else.' I started at a 45 percent grade. I developed an electric locomotive with a grip on the rail that allowed it to ascend the 45 percent grade. Then they said the curves were very tight. I incorporated the curves. We started the locomotive with no one on it and reached twenty miles an hour, taking those very short radius curves; but it took weeks before we could stop it from derailing. We had to bank the tracks at a thirty-degree angle to make the curves stay on. These Spanish parties were completely convinced we could successfully implement an electric railway from Honda to Bogotá, and then they disappeared. I haven’t seen them since. As usual, I paid for the experiment."
In the spring of 1883 the Electric Railway Company of America was incorporated in the State of New York with a capital of $2,000,000 to develop the patents and inventions of Edison and Stephen D. Field, to the latter of whom the practical work of active development was confided, and in June of the same year an exhibit was made at the Chicago Railway Exposition, which attracted attention throughout the country, and did much to stimulate the growing interest in electric-railway work. With the aid of Messrs. F. B. Rae, C. L. Healy, and C. O. Mailloux a track and locomotive were constructed for the company by Mr. Field and put in service in the gallery of the main exhibition building. The track curved sharply at either end on a radius of fifty-six feet, and the length was about one-third of a mile. The locomotive named "The Judge," after Justice Field, an uncle of Stephen D. Field, took current from a central rail between the two outer rails, that were the return circuit, the contact being a rubbing wire brush on each side of the "third rail," answering the same purpose as the contact shoe of later date. The locomotive weighed three tons, was twelve feet long, five feet wide, and made a speed of nine miles an hour with a trailer car for passengers. Starting on June 5th, when the exhibition closed on June 23d this tiny but typical road had operated for over 118 hours, had made over 446 miles, and had carried 26,805 passengers. After the exposition closed the outfit was taken during the same year to the exposition at Louisville, Kentucky, where it was also successful, carrying a large number of passengers. It deserves note that at Chicago regular railway tickets were issued to paying passengers, the first ever employed on American electric railways.
In the spring of 1883, the Electric Railway Company of America was incorporated in New York State with a capital of $2,000,000 to develop the patents and inventions of Edison and Stephen D. Field. The practical work of active development was assigned to Field. In June of the same year, an exhibit was held at the Chicago Railway Exposition, which caught national attention and significantly boosted interest in electric railway projects. With the assistance of F. B. Rae, C. L. Healy, and C. O. Mailloux, a track and locomotive were built for the company by Field and set up in the gallery of the main exhibition building. The track had sharp curves at both ends with a radius of fifty-six feet and stretched about one-third of a mile. The locomotive, named "The Judge" after Justice Field, who was Stephen D. Field's uncle, drew power from a central rail located between the two outer rails, which served as the return circuit. It used a wire brush to rub against each side of the "third rail," which functioned similarly to the contact shoes used later. The locomotive weighed three tons, was twelve feet long, five feet wide, and reached a speed of nine miles per hour while pulling a passenger trailer. Starting on June 5th, and running until the exhibition closed on June 23rd, this small yet representative railway operated for over 118 hours, covered over 446 miles, and transported 26,805 passengers. After the expo ended, the setup was taken to the exposition in Louisville, Kentucky, later that same year, where it also achieved success, carrying a large number of passengers. Notably, in Chicago, regular railway tickets were issued to paying passengers, marking the first time this practice was used on American electric railways.
With this modest but brilliant demonstration, to which the illustrious names of Edison and Field were attached, began the outburst of excitement over electric railways, very much like the eras of speculation and exploitation that attended only a few years earlier the introduction of the telephone and the electric light, but with such significant results that the capitalization of electric roads in America is now over $4,000,000,000, or twice as much as that of the other two arts combined. There was a tremendous rush into the electric-railway field after 1883, and an outburst of inventive activity that has rarely, if ever, been equalled. It is remarkable that, except Siemens, no European achieved fame in this early work, while from America the ideas and appliances of Edison, Van Depoele, Sprague, Field, Daft, and Short have been carried and adopted all over the world.
With this modest but impressive demonstration, associated with the renowned names of Edison and Field, the excitement over electric railways began, similar to the speculative frenzy that followed the introduction of the telephone and the electric light just a few years earlier. However, the outcomes were so significant that the value of electric railways in America now exceeds $4 billion, which is double that of the other two technologies combined. There was a huge rush into the electric railway sector after 1883, sparking a wave of innovation that has rarely, if ever, been matched. It’s noteworthy that, except for Siemens, no European became famous during this early stage, while ideas and inventions from Americans like Edison, Van Depoele, Sprague, Field, Daft, and Short have been adopted worldwide.
Mr. Edison was consulting electrician for the Electric Railway Company, but neither a director nor an executive officer. Just what the trouble was as to the internal management of the corporation it is hard to determine a quarter of a century later; but it was equipped with all essential elements to dominate an art in which after its first efforts it remained practically supine and useless, while other interests forged ahead and reaped both the profit and the glory. Dissensions arose between the representatives of the Field and Edison interests, and in April, 1890, the Railway Company assigned its rights to the Edison patents to the Edison General Electric Company, recently formed by the consolidation of all the branches of the Edison light, power, and manufacturing industry under one management. The only patent rights remaining to the Railway Company were those under three Field patents, one of which, with controlling claims, was put in suit June, 1890, against the Jamaica & Brooklyn Road Company, a customer of the Edison General Electric Company. This was, to say the least, a curious and anomalous situation. Voluminous records were made by both parties to the suit, and in the spring of 1894 the case was argued before the late Judge Townsend, who wrote a long opinion dismissing the bill of complaint. [15] The student will find therein a very complete and careful study of the early electric-railway art. After this decision was rendered, the Electric Railway Company remained for several years in a moribund condition, and on the last day of 1896 its property was placed in the hands of a receiver. In February of 1897 the receiver sold the three Field patents to their original owner, and he in turn sold them to the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company. The Railway Company then went into voluntary dissolution, a sad example of failure to seize the opportunity at the psychological moment, and on the part of the inventor to secure any adequate return for years of effort and struggle in founding one of the great arts. Neither of these men was squelched by such a calamitous result, but if there were not something of bitterness in their feelings as they survey what has come of their work, they would not be human.
Mr. Edison was the consulting electrician for the Electric Railway Company, but he wasn’t a director or an executive officer. It's hard to pinpoint the internal management issues of the corporation a quarter of a century later, but it had all the essential elements to lead in a field where, after its initial efforts, it remained mostly stagnant and ineffective, while other interests advanced and enjoyed both the profits and accolades. Conflicts arose between the representatives of the Field and Edison interests, and in April 1890, the Railway Company transferred its rights to the Edison patents to the Edison General Electric Company, which had recently been formed by consolidating all branches of the Edison light, power, and manufacturing businesses under one management. The only patent rights left with the Railway Company were from three Field patents, one of which, with crucial claims, was put into litigation in June 1890 against the Jamaica & Brooklyn Road Company, a customer of the Edison General Electric Company. This was, at the very least, a strange and unusual situation. Both parties to the suit created extensive records, and in the spring of 1894, the case was argued before the late Judge Townsend, who wrote a long opinion dismissing the complaint. [15] Students will find a very thorough and detailed analysis of the early electric railway technology in that opinion. After this decision was made, the Electric Railway Company lingered in a weakened state for several years, and on the last day of 1896, its assets were put into the hands of a receiver. In February 1897, the receiver sold the three Field patents back to their original owner, who then sold them to the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company. The Railway Company then went into voluntary dissolution, a disheartening example of failing to capitalize on an opportunity at the right moment, and a failure on the inventor's part to gain any substantial return for years of effort and struggle in establishing one of the great technological fields. Neither of these men was completely defeated by such a disastrous outcome, but if they didn’t feel some bitterness as they looked back on what had resulted from their work, they wouldn’t be human.
As a matter of fact, Edison retained a very lively interest in electric-railway progress long after the pregnant days at Menlo Park, one of the best evidences of which is an article in the New York Electrical Engineer of November 18, 1891, which describes some important and original experiments in the direction of adapting electrical conditions to the larger cities. The overhead trolley had by that time begun its victorious career, but there was intense hostility displayed toward it in many places because of the inevitable increase in the number of overhead wires, which, carrying, as they did, a current of high voltage and large quantity, were regarded as a menace to life and property. Edison has always manifested a strong objection to overhead wires in cities, and urged placing them underground; and the outcry against the overhead "deadly" trolley met with his instant sympathy. His study of the problem brought him to the development of the modern "substation," although the twists that later evolutions have given the idea have left it scarcely recognizable.
Edison remained very interested in the progress of electric railways long after his significant days at Menlo Park. A clear example of this is an article in the New York Electrical Engineer from November 18, 1891, which outlines some important and original experiments aimed at adapting electrical systems for larger cities. By that time, the overhead trolley was starting its successful run, but it faced strong opposition in many areas due to the inevitable rise in the number of overhead wires. These wires, which carried high voltage and large quantities of electricity, were seen as threats to safety and property. Edison consistently opposed overhead wires in cities and advocated for placing them underground. He immediately sympathized with the backlash against the overhead "deadly" trolley. His exploration of the issue led to the development of the modern "substation," although subsequent changes to the concept have made it almost unrecognizable.
[Footnote 15: See 61 Fed. Rep. 655.]
[Footnote 15: See 61 Fed. Rep. 655.]
Mr. Villard, as President of the Edison General Electric Company, requested Mr. Edison, as electrician of the company, to devise a street-railway system which should be applicable to the largest cities where the use of the trolley would not be permitted, where the slot conduit system would not be used, and where, in general, the details of construction should be reduced to the simplest form. The limits imposed practically were such as to require that the system should not cost more than a cable road to install. Edison reverted to his ingenious lighting plan of years earlier, and thus settled on a method by which current should be conveyed from the power plant at high potential to motor-generators placed below the ground in close proximity to the rails. These substations would convert the current received at a pressure of, say, one thousand volts to one of twenty volts available between rail and rail, with a corresponding increase in the volume of the current. With the utilization of heavy currents at low voltage it became necessary, of course, to devise apparatus which should be able to pick up with absolute certainty one thousand amperes of current at this pressure through two inches of mud, if necessary. With his wonted activity and fertility Edison set about devising such a contact, and experimented with metal wheels under all conditions of speed and track conditions. It was several months before he could convey one hundred amperes by means of such contacts, but he worked out at last a satisfactory device which was equal to the task. The next point was to secure a joint between contiguous rails such as would permit of the passage of several thousand amperes without introducing undue resistance. This was also accomplished.
Mr. Villard, as President of the Edison General Electric Company, asked Mr. Edison, the company’s electrician, to come up with a street railway system that could be used in large cities where trolleys weren't allowed, the slot conduit system wasn’t an option, and generally, the construction details needed to be as simple as possible. The practical limitations meant the system shouldn’t cost more to install than a cable car system. Edison went back to his clever lighting plan from years before and decided on a method to transfer electricity from the power plant at high voltage to underground motor-generators located near the tracks. These substations would change the received current, let’s say, from about one thousand volts to twenty volts usable between the rails, while increasing the current’s volume. Since they needed to use heavy currents at low voltage, it was essential to create equipment that could reliably pick up one thousand amperes of current at this voltage through two inches of mud if necessary. With his usual energy and creativity, Edison began to develop such a contact and tested metal wheels under various speeds and track conditions. It took several months before he could transfer one hundred amperes with those contacts, but he ultimately designed a device that met the requirements. The next challenge was to create a joint between adjacent rails that would allow several thousand amperes to pass through without creating too much resistance. This was also successfully achieved.
Objections were naturally made to rails out in the open on the street surface carrying large currents at a potential of twenty volts. It was said that vehicles with iron wheels passing over the tracks and spanning the two rails would short-circuit the current, "chew" themselves up, and destroy the dynamos generating the current by choking all that tremendous amount of energy back into them. Edison tackled the objection squarely and short-circuited his track with such a vehicle, but succeeded in getting only about two hundred amperes through the wheels, the low voltage and the insulating properties of the axle-grease being sufficient to account for such a result. An iron bar was also used, polished, and with a man standing on it to insure solid contact; but only one thousand amperes passed through it—i.e., the amount required by a single car, and, of course, much less than the capacity of the generators able to operate a system of several hundred cars.
Objections were naturally raised about having open rails on the street surface carrying large currents at a potential of twenty volts. It was argued that vehicles with iron wheels passing over the tracks, connecting the two rails, would short-circuit the current, "chew" themselves up, and damage the dynamos generating the current by forcing all that tremendous energy back into them. Edison directly addressed the objection and short-circuited his track with such a vehicle, but he managed to get only about two hundred amperes through the wheels. The low voltage and the insulating properties of the axle grease explained this outcome. He also tested a polished iron bar with a man standing on it to ensure solid contact, but only one thousand amperes passed through it—essentially, the amount needed by a single car, and far less than what the generators could handle to power a system of several hundred cars.
Further interesting experiments showed that the expected large leakage of current from the rails in wet weather did not materialize. Edison found that under the worst conditions with a wet and salted track, at a potential difference of twenty volts between the two rails, the extreme loss was only two and one-half horse-power. In this respect the phenomenon followed the same rule as that to which telegraph wires are subject—namely, that the loss of insulation is greater in damp, murky weather when the insulators are covered with wet dust than during heavy rains when the insulators are thoroughly washed by the action of the water. In like manner a heavy rain-storm cleaned the tracks from the accumulations due chiefly to the droppings of the horses, which otherwise served largely to increase the conductivity. Of course, in dry weather the loss of current was practically nothing, and, under ordinary conditions, Edison held, his system was in respect to leakage and the problems of electrolytic attack of the current on adjacent pipes, etc., as fully insulated as the standard trolley network of the day. The cost of his system Mr. Edison placed at from $30,000 to $100,000 per mile of double track, in accordance with local conditions, and in this respect comparing very favorably with the cable systems then so much in favor for heavy traffic. All the arguments that could be urged in support of this ingenious system are tenable and logical at the present moment; but the trolley had its way except on a few lines where the conduit-and-shoe method was adopted; and in the intervening years the volume of traffic created and handled by electricity in centres of dense population has brought into existence the modern subway.
Further interesting experiments showed that the expected large leakage of current from the rails in wet weather didn’t happen. Edison discovered that even under the worst conditions, with a wet and salted track, at a potential difference of twenty volts between the two rails, the maximum loss was only two and a half horse-power. In this regard, the phenomenon followed the same principle as telegraph wires—namely, that the loss of insulation is greater in damp, murky weather when the insulators are covered in wet dust than during heavy rain, when the insulators get thoroughly washed by the water. Similarly, a heavy rainstorm cleaned the tracks of the buildup mainly caused by horse droppings, which otherwise significantly increased conductivity. Of course, in dry weather, the loss of current was practically negligible, and under normal conditions, Edison argued, his system was as fully insulated against leakage and the issues of electrolytic corrosion on nearby pipes as the standard trolley networks of the time. Edison estimated the cost of his system at between $30,000 and $100,000 per mile of double track, depending on local conditions, which compared very favorably with the cable systems that were popular for heavy traffic back then. All the arguments that could support this clever system are still valid and logical today; however, the trolley system prevailed except on a few lines that adopted the conduit-and-shoe method. In the years that followed, the growing volume of traffic generated and managed by electricity in densely populated areas led to the creation of the modern subway.
But down to the moment of the preparation of this biography, Edison has retained an active interest in transportation problems, and his latest work has been that of reviving the use of the storage battery for street-car purposes. At one time there were a number of storage-battery lines and cars in operation in such cities as Washington, New York, Chicago, and Boston; but the costs of operation and maintenance were found to be inordinately high as compared with those of the direct-supply methods, and the battery cars all disappeared. The need for them under many conditions remained, as, for example, in places in Greater New York where the overhead trolley wires are forbidden as objectionable, and where the ground is too wet or too often submerged to permit of the conduit with the slot. Some of the roads in Greater New York have been anxious to secure such cars, and, as usual, the most resourceful electrical engineer and inventor of his times has made the effort. A special experimental track has been laid at the Orange laboratory, and a car equipped with the Edison storage battery and other devices has been put under severe and extended trial there and in New York.
But up until the time this biography was being prepared, Edison has continued to have a strong interest in transportation issues, and his latest project has been to bring back the use of storage batteries for streetcars. At one point, there were several storage-battery lines and cars running in cities like Washington, New York, Chicago, and Boston; however, the operating and maintenance costs were found to be excessively high compared to direct supply methods, leading to the disappearance of the battery cars. The need for them still existed in many situations, such as in parts of Greater New York where overhead trolley wires are not allowed due to their negative aesthetic impact, and where the ground is too wet or frequently flooded to support a conduit with a slot. Some of the transit systems in Greater New York have been eager to obtain such cars, and, as always, the most innovative electrical engineer and inventor of his era has taken on the challenge. A special experimental track has been set up at the Orange laboratory, and a car outfitted with the Edison storage battery and other systems has undergone rigorous and extensive testing there and in New York.
Menlo Park, in ruin and decay, affords no traces of the early Edison electric-railway work, but the crude little locomotive built by Charles T. Hughes was rescued from destruction, and has become the property of the Pratt Institute, of Brooklyn, to whose thousands of technical students it is a constant example and incentive. It was loaned in 1904 to the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, and by it exhibited as part of the historical Edison collection at the St. Louis Exposition.
Menlo Park, in ruin and decay, shows no signs of the early Edison electric railway work, but the simple little locomotive built by Charles T. Hughes was saved from destruction and has become the property of the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, where it serves as a constant example and inspiration for thousands of technical students. It was loaned in 1904 to the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, which exhibited it as part of the historical Edison collection at the St. Louis Exposition.
CHAPTER XIX
MAGNETIC ORE MILLING WORK
DURING the Hudson-Fulton celebration of October, 1909, Burgomaster Van Leeuwen, of Amsterdam, member of the delegation sent officially from Holland to escort the Half Moon and participate in the functions of the anniversary, paid a visit to the Edison laboratory at Orange to see the inventor, who may be regarded as pre-eminent among those of Dutch descent in this country. Found, as usual, hard at work—this time on his cement house, of which he showed the iron molds—Edison took occasion to remark that if he had achieved anything worth while, it was due to the obstinacy and pertinacity he had inherited from his forefathers. To which it may be added that not less equally have the nature of inheritance and the quality of atavism been exhibited in his extraordinary predilection for the miller's art. While those Batavian ancestors on the low shores of the Zuyder Zee devoted their energies to grinding grain, he has been not less assiduous than they in reducing the rocks of the earth itself to flour.
DURING the Hudson-Fulton celebration in October 1909, Burgomaster Van Leeuwen from Amsterdam, part of the delegation officially sent from Holland to welcome the Half Moon and take part in the anniversary events, visited the Edison laboratory in Orange to meet the inventor, who is considered one of the most prominent figures of Dutch descent in this country. As usual, he was hard at work—this time on his cement house, of which he showed the iron molds. Edison took the opportunity to say that if he accomplished anything worthwhile, it was because of the stubbornness and persistence he inherited from his ancestors. It’s also worth noting that both the nature of inheritance and the quality of atavism have been evident in his remarkable passion for the miller's craft. While those Dutch ancestors along the low shores of the Zuyder Zee spent their energy grinding grain, he has been just as diligent in turning the very rocks of the earth into flour.
Although this phase of Mr. Edison's diverse activities is not as generally known to the world as many others of a more popular character, the milling of low-grade auriferous ores and the magnetic separation of iron ores have been subjects of engrossing interest and study to him for many years. Indeed, his comparatively unknown enterprise of separating magnetically and putting into commercial form low-grade iron ore, as carried on at Edison, New Jersey, proved to be the most colossal experiment that he has ever made.
Although this phase of Mr. Edison's various activities isn't as widely recognized as many of his more popular endeavors, he has been deeply interested in milling low-grade gold-bearing ores and magnetically separating iron ores for many years. In fact, his relatively obscure project of magnetically separating and commercializing low-grade iron ore in Edison, New Jersey, turned out to be the largest experiment he has ever undertaken.
If a person qualified to judge were asked to answer categorically as to whether or not that enterprise was a failure, he could truthfully answer both yes and no. Yes, in that circumstances over which Mr. Edison had no control compelled the shutting down of the plant at the very moment of success; and no, in that the mechanically successful and commercially practical results obtained, after the exercise of stupendous efforts and the expenditure of a fortune, are so conclusive that they must inevitably be the reliance of many future iron-masters. In other words, Mr. Edison was at least a quarter of a century ahead of the times in the work now to be considered.
If a qualified person were asked to definitively say whether that venture was a failure, they could honestly say both yes and no. Yes, because circumstances beyond Mr. Edison’s control forced the plant to shut down right at the moment of success; and no, because the successful and commercially viable results achieved, after immense effort and significant spending, are so clear that they will definitely be relied upon by many future iron manufacturers. In other words, Mr. Edison was at least twenty-five years ahead of his time in the work we are about to discuss.
Before proceeding to a specific description of this remarkable enterprise, however, let us glance at an early experiment in separating magnetic iron sands on the Atlantic sea-shore: "Some years ago I heard one day that down at Quogue, Long Island, there were immense deposits of black magnetic sand. This would be very valuable if the iron could be separated from the sand. So I went down to Quogue with one of my assistants and saw there for miles large beds of black sand on the beach in layers from one to six inches thick—hundreds of thousands of tons. My first thought was that it would be a very easy matter to concentrate this, and I found I could sell the stuff at a good price. I put up a small plant, but just as I got it started a tremendous storm came up, and every bit of that black sand went out to sea. During the twenty-eight years that have intervened it has never come back." This incident was really the prelude to the development set forth in this chapter.
Before diving into a detailed description of this remarkable venture, let's take a look at an early experiment in separating magnetic iron sands along the Atlantic coast: "A few years ago, I heard that there were huge deposits of black magnetic sand down in Quogue, Long Island. This could be very valuable if we could extract the iron from the sand. So, I traveled to Quogue with one of my assistants and saw miles of large beds of black sand along the beach, in layers from one to six inches thick—hundreds of thousands of tons. My first thought was that concentrating this would be very straightforward, and I realized I could sell the material at a good price. I set up a small processing plant, but just as I was getting it going, a massive storm hit, and all that black sand washed away into the sea. In the twenty-eight years since, it has never returned." This incident was truly the beginning of the developments detailed in this chapter.
In the early eighties Edison became familiar with the fact that the Eastern steel trade was suffering a disastrous change, and that business was slowly drifting westward, chiefly by reason of the discovery and opening up of enormous deposits of high-grade iron ore in the upper peninsula of Michigan. This ore could be excavated very cheaply by means of improved mining facilities, and transported at low cost to lake ports. Hence the iron and steel mills east of the Alleghanies—compelled to rely on limited local deposits of Bessemer ore, and upon foreign ores which were constantly rising in value—began to sustain a serious competition with Western mills, even in Eastern markets.
In the early eighties, Edison became aware that the Eastern steel industry was undergoing a significant change, with business gradually shifting west due to the discovery and development of large deposits of high-quality iron ore in Michigan's upper peninsula. This ore could be mined very cheaply with improved mining technology and transported at a low cost to lake ports. As a result, the iron and steel mills east of the Alleghenies—forced to depend on limited local Bessemer ore and increasingly expensive foreign ores—started to face serious competition from Western mills, even in Eastern markets.
Long before this situation arose, it had been recognized by Eastern iron-masters that sooner or later the deposits of high-grade ore would be exhausted, and, in consequence, there would ensue a compelling necessity to fall back on the low-grade magnetic ores. For many years it had been a much-discussed question how to make these ores available for transportation to distant furnaces. To pay railroad charges on ores carrying perhaps 80 to 90 per cent. of useless material would be prohibitive. Hence the elimination of the worthless "gangue" by concentration of the iron particles associated with it, seemed to be the only solution of the problem.
Long before this situation came up, Eastern iron manufacturers had realized that eventually the supplies of high-quality ore would run out. As a result, there would be a strong need to turn to low-grade magnetic ores. For many years, there had been ongoing discussions about how to make these ores transportable to faraway furnaces. Paying railroad fees for ores that contained 80 to 90 percent useless material would be too expensive. Therefore, removing the worthless "gangue" by concentrating the iron particles mixed in with it appeared to be the only solution to the problem.
Many attempts had been made in by-gone days to concentrate the iron in such ores by water processes, but with only a partial degree of success. The impossibility of obtaining a uniform concentrate was a most serious objection, had there not indeed been other difficulties which rendered this method commercially impracticable. It is quite natural, therefore, that the idea of magnetic separation should have occurred to many inventors. Thus we find numerous instances throughout the last century of experiments along this line; and particularly in the last forty or fifty years, during which various attempts have been made by others than Edison to perfect magnetic separation and bring it up to something like commercial practice. At the time he took up the matter, however, no one seems to have realized the full meaning of the tremendous problems involved.
Many attempts had been made in the past to concentrate the iron in such ores using water processes, but they only achieved partial success. The inability to obtain a consistent concentrate was a significant drawback, especially since there were other challenges that made this method commercially unviable. It's only natural that the idea of magnetic separation would come to many inventors' minds. As a result, we see numerous examples of experiments in this area throughout the last century, especially in the past forty or fifty years, where various people besides Edison tried to refine magnetic separation and make it more commercially viable. However, at the time he started looking into it, no one seemed to fully understand the immense problems involved.
From 1880 to 1885, while still very busy in the development of his electric-light system, Edison found opportunity to plan crushing and separating machinery. His first patent on the subject was applied for and issued early in 1880. He decided, after mature deliberation, that the magnetic separation of low-grade ores on a colossal scale at a low cost was the only practical way of supplying the furnace-man with a high quality of iron ore. It was his opinion that it was cheaper to quarry and concentrate lean ore in a big way than to attempt to mine, under adverse circumstances, limited bodies of high-grade ore. He appreciated fully the serious nature of the gigantic questions involved; and his plans were laid with a view to exercising the utmost economy in the design and operation of the plant in which he contemplated the automatic handling of many thousands of tons of material daily. It may be stated as broadly true that Edison engineered to handle immense masses of stuff automatically, while his predecessors aimed chiefly at close separation.
From 1880 to 1885, while he was busy developing his electric-light system, Edison found time to plan crushing and separating machinery. He applied for and received his first patent on this topic early in 1880. After careful consideration, he concluded that the magnetic separation of low-grade ores on a large scale and at a low cost was the only practical way to provide furnace operators with high-quality iron ore. He believed it was cheaper to mine and concentrate low-grade ore in bulk than to try to extract limited quantities of high-grade ore under difficult conditions. He fully understood the serious nature of the enormous challenges involved; and his plans were made with the intention of maximizing efficiency in the design and operation of the plant, where he envisioned the automatic handling of many thousands of tons of material each day. It can be said that Edison designed systems to handle huge amounts of material automatically, while his predecessors focused mainly on precise separation.
Reduced to its barest, crudest terms, the proposition of magnetic separation is simplicity itself. A piece of the ore (magnetite) may be reduced to powder and the ore particles separated therefrom by the help of a simple hand magnet. To elucidate the basic principle of Edison's method, let the crushed ore fall in a thin stream past such a magnet. The magnetic particles are attracted out of the straight line of the falling stream, and being heavy, gravitate inwardly and fall to one side of a partition placed below. The non-magnetic gangue descends in a straight line to the other side of the partition. Thus a complete separation is effected.
Reduced to its simplest form, the idea of magnetic separation is really straightforward. A piece of ore (magnetite) can be ground into powder, and the ore particles can be separated using a basic hand magnet. To explain the core principle of Edison's method, imagine crushed ore flowing past a magnet in a thin stream. The magnetic particles are pulled out of the direct path of the falling stream and, being heavy, drop inward and land on one side of a partition placed below. The non-magnetic waste falls straight down to the other side of the partition. This way, a complete separation is achieved.
Simple though the principle appears, it was in its application to vast masses of material and in the solving of great engineering problems connected therewith that Edison's originality made itself manifest in the concentrating works that he established in New Jersey, early in the nineties. Not only did he develop thoroughly the refining of the crushed ore, so that after it had passed the four hundred and eighty magnets in the mill, the concentrates came out finally containing 91 to 93 per cent. of iron oxide, but he also devised collateral machinery, methods and processes all fundamental in their nature. These are too numerous to specify in detail, as they extended throughout the various ramifications of the plant, but the principal ones are worthy of mention, such as:
Although the principle seems simple, it was in applying it to large quantities of material and tackling significant engineering challenges that Edison's creativity stood out in the concentrating facilities he set up in New Jersey in the early 1890s. He not only improved the refining of the crushed ore so that, after passing through the four hundred and eighty magnets in the mill, the concentrates contained 91 to 93 percent iron oxide, but he also developed related machinery, methods, and processes that were all foundational in nature. There are too many to list in detail, as they covered various aspects of the plant, but the main ones deserve to be mentioned, such as:
The giant rolls (for crushing). Intermediate rolls. Three-high rolls. Giant cranes (215 feet long span). Vertical dryer. Belt conveyors. Air separation. Mechanical separation of phosphorus. Briquetting.
The large rolls (for crushing). Intermediate rolls. Three-high rolls. Giant cranes (215 feet long span). Vertical dryer. Belt conveyors. Air separation. Mechanical separation of phosphorus. Briquetting.
That Mr. Edison's work was appreciated at the time is made evident by the following extract from an article describing the Edison plant, published in The Iron Age of October 28, 1897; in which, after mentioning his struggle with adverse conditions, it says: "There is very little that is showy, from the popular point of view, in the gigantic work which Mr. Edison has done during these years, but to those who are capable of grasping the difficulties encountered, Mr. Edison appears in the new light of a brilliant constructing engineer grappling with technical and commercial problems of the highest order. His genius as an inventor is revealed in many details of the great concentrating plant.... But to our mind, originality of the highest type as a constructor and designer appears in the bold way in which he sweeps aside accepted practice in this particular field and attains results not hitherto approached. He pursues methods in ore-dressing at which those who are trained in the usual practice may well stand aghast. But considering the special features of the problems to be solved, his methods will be accepted as those economically wise and expedient."
That Mr. Edison's work was appreciated at the time is clear from the following excerpt from an article describing the Edison plant, published in The Iron Age on October 28, 1897. After mentioning his struggle with challenging conditions, it states: "There isn't much that seems impressive, from a popular perspective, in the massive work Mr. Edison has accomplished over these years, but for those who understand the difficulties he faced, Mr. Edison shines as a brilliant construction engineer dealing with high-level technical and commercial challenges. His talent as an inventor is evident in many aspects of the large concentrating plant.... However, in our view, the highest level of originality as a constructor and designer is shown in the bold way he disregards established practices in this area and achieves results that haven’t been seen before. He uses methods in ore-dressing that might leave those trained in conventional practices stunned. But given the unique aspects of the problems he needs to solve, his methods will be recognized as economically smart and practical."
A cursory glance at these problems will reveal their import. Mountains must be reduced to dust; all this dust must be handled in detail, so to speak, and from it must be separated the fine particles of iron constituting only one-fourth or one-fifth of its mass; and then this iron-ore dust must be put into such shape that it could be commercially shipped and used. One of the most interesting and striking investigations made by Edison in this connection is worthy of note, and may be related in his own words: "I felt certain that there must be large bodies of magnetite in the East, which if crushed and concentrated would satisfy the wants of the Eastern furnaces for steel-making. Having determined to investigate the mountain regions of New Jersey, I constructed a very sensitive magnetic needle, which would dip toward the earth if brought over any considerable body of magnetic iron ore. One of my laboratory assistants went out with me and we visited many of the mines of New Jersey, but did not find deposits of any magnitude. One day, however, as we drove over a mountain range, not known as iron-bearing land, I was astonished to find that the needle was strongly attracted and remained so; thus indicating that the whole mountain was underlaid with vast bodies of magnetic ore.
A quick look at these issues will show their significance. Mountains need to be ground into dust; all this dust must be processed carefully, so to speak, and from it must be separated the fine iron particles that make up only one-fourth or one-fifth of its mass; then this iron-ore dust must be shaped so that it can be commercially shipped and used. One of the most interesting and notable investigations Edison conducted in this regard is worth mentioning, and he described it in his own words: "I was convinced there must be large deposits of magnetite in the East that, if crushed and concentrated, would meet the steel-making needs of the Eastern furnaces. Determined to explore the mountain areas of New Jersey, I built a very sensitive magnetic needle that would dip towards the ground if it came over any significant body of magnetic iron ore. One of my lab assistants accompanied me, and we visited many of the mines in New Jersey but didn't find any major deposits. However, one day, as we drove over a mountain range not known for iron deposits, I was surprised to see the needle strongly attracted and remaining so; this indicated that the entire mountain was underlaid with vast reserves of magnetic ore.
"I knew it was a commercial problem to produce high-grade Bessemer ore from these deposits, and took steps to acquire a large amount of the property. I also planned a great magnetic survey of the East, and I believe it remains the most comprehensive of its kind yet performed. I had a number of men survey a strip reaching from Lower Canada to North Carolina. The only instrument we used was the special magnetic needle. We started in Lower Canada and travelled across the line of march twenty-five miles; then advanced south one thousand feet; then back across the line of march again twenty-five miles; then south another thousand feet, across again, and so on. Thus we advanced all the way to North Carolina, varying our cross-country march from two to twenty-five miles, according to geological formation. Our magnetic needle indicated the presence and richness of the invisible deposits of magnetic ore. We kept minute records of these indications, and when the survey was finished we had exact information of the deposits in every part of each State we had passed through. We also knew the width, length, and approximate depth of every one of these deposits, which were enormous.
I realized it was a business challenge to extract high-quality Bessemer ore from these deposits, so I took steps to acquire a significant amount of the land. I also planned a major magnetic survey of the East, which I believe is still the most detailed of its kind ever conducted. I had several men map out a strip stretching from Lower Canada to North Carolina. The only tool we used was a special magnetic needle. We started in Lower Canada and traveled across our path for twenty-five miles, then moved south a thousand feet, then crossed back over our path again for twenty-five miles, then south another thousand feet, and so on. This pattern continued all the way to North Carolina, adjusting our cross-country march from two to twenty-five miles, based on the geological landscape. Our magnetic needle revealed the presence and richness of the hidden deposits of magnetic ore. We meticulously recorded these findings, and by the end of the survey, we had precise information about the deposits in every part of each state we traversed. We also had data on the width, length, and approximate depth of each of these vast deposits.
"The amount of ore disclosed by this survey was simply fabulous. How much so may be judged from the fact that in the three thousand acres immediately surrounding the mills that I afterward established at Edison there were over 200,000,000 tons of low-grade ore. I also secured sixteen thousand acres in which the deposit was proportionately as large. These few acres alone contained sufficient ore to supply the whole United States iron trade, including exports, for seventy years."
"The amount of ore revealed by this survey was incredible. You can tell just how incredible it was by the fact that in the three thousand acres right around the mills I later set up at Edison, there were over 200,000,000 tons of low-grade ore. I also acquired sixteen thousand acres where the deposit was similarly large. Just these few acres had enough ore to supply the entire iron industry of the United States, including exports, for seventy years."
Given a mountain of rock containing only one-fifth to one-fourth magnetic iron, the broad problem confronting Edison resolved itself into three distinct parts—first, to tear down the mountain bodily and grind it to powder; second, to extract from this powder the particles of iron mingled in its mass; and, third, to accomplish these results at a cost sufficiently low to give the product a commercial value.
Given a large mountain of rock that has only one-fifth to one-fourth magnetic iron, the main challenge Edison faced broke down into three clear parts—first, to completely dismantle the mountain and grind it into powder; second, to separate the iron particles mixed in the powder; and third, to achieve these results at a cost low enough to make the product commercially viable.
Edison realized from the start that the true solution of this problem lay in the continuous treatment of the material, with the maximum employment of natural forces and the minimum of manual labor and generated power. Hence, all his conceptions followed this general principle so faithfully and completely that we find in the plant embodying his ideas the forces of momentum and gravity steadily in harness and keeping the traces taut; while there was no touch of the human hand upon the material from the beginning of the treatment to its finish—the staff being employed mainly to keep watch on the correct working of the various processes.
Edison understood right from the beginning that the real solution to this issue was in the ongoing processing of the material, using as much natural energy as possible and as little manual labor and generated power as necessary. Therefore, all his ideas adhered so closely to this principle that we see in the plant that represents his vision the forces of momentum and gravity continuously controlled and maintaining tension; while there was no human touch on the material from the start of the process to its completion—the staff was mainly there to monitor the proper functioning of the different processes.
It is hardly necessary to devote space to the beginnings of the enterprise, although they are full of interest. They served, however, to convince Edison that if he ever expected to carry out his scheme on the extensive scale planned, he could not depend upon the market to supply suitable machinery for important operations, but would be obliged to devise and build it himself. Thus, outside the steam-shovel and such staple items as engines, boilers, dynamos, and motors, all of the diverse and complex machinery of the entire concentrating plant, as subsequently completed, was devised by him especially for the purpose. The necessity for this was due to the many radical variations made from accepted methods.
There’s really no need to spend much time on the early days of the project, even though they’re quite interesting. However, they did make Edison realize that if he wanted to implement his plan on the large scale he envisioned, he couldn’t rely on the market to provide the right machinery for important tasks. He would have to invent and build it himself. So, apart from the steam-shovel and basic items like engines, boilers, dynamos, and motors, all the various and complex machinery for the entire concentrating plant, as finished later on, was designed by him specifically for this purpose. This was necessary because of the many significant changes made from the standard methods.
No such departure was as radical as that of the method of crushing the ore. Existing machinery for this purpose had been designed on the basis of mining methods then in vogue, by which the rock was thoroughly shattered by means of high explosives and reduced to pieces of one hundred pounds or less. These pieces were then crushed by power directly applied. If a concentrating mill, planned to treat five or six thousand tons per day, were to be operated on this basis the investment in crushers and the supply of power would be enormous, to say nothing of the risk of frequent breakdowns by reason of multiplicity of machinery and parts. From a consideration of these facts, and with his usual tendency to upset traditional observances, Edison conceived the bold idea of constructing gigantic rolls which, by the force of momentum, would be capable of crushing individual rocks of vastly greater size than ever before attempted. He reasoned that the advantages thus obtained would be fourfold: a minimum of machinery and parts; greater compactness; a saving of power; and greater economy in mining. As this last-named operation precedes the crushing, let us first consider it as it was projected and carried on by him.
No departure was as drastic as the way of crushing the ore. The existing machinery for this task had been designed based on popular mining methods at the time, where rock was completely shattered using high explosives and broken down into chunks weighing one hundred pounds or less. These chunks were then crushed with applied power. If a concentrating mill, designed to process five or six thousand tons per day, operated this way, the investment in crushers and power supply would be massive, not to mention the frequent breakdown risks from the numerous machines and parts. Taking these facts into account, and with his usual knack for challenging traditional practices, Edison came up with the innovative idea of building giant rolls that would crush individual rocks much larger than anything attempted before, using momentum. He believed that this approach would offer four main advantages: fewer machines and parts, more compactness, power savings, and greater efficiency in mining. Since this final operation occurs before crushing, let's first look at how he planned and executed it.
Perhaps quarrying would be a better term than mining in this case, as Edison's plan was to approach the rock and tear it down bodily. The faith that "moves mountains" had a new opportunity. In work of this nature it had been customary, as above stated, to depend upon a high explosive, such as dynamite, to shatter and break the ore to lumps of one hundred pounds or less. This, however, he deemed to be a most uneconomical process, for energy stored as heat units in dynamite at $260 per ton was much more expensive than that of calories in a ton of coal at $3 per ton. Hence, he believed that only the minimum of work should be done with the costly explosive; and, therefore, planned to use dynamite merely to dislodge great masses of rock, and depended upon the steam-shovel, operated by coal under the boiler, to displace, handle, and remove the rock in detail. This was the plan that was subsequently put into practice in the great works at Edison, New Jersey. A series of three-inch holes twenty feet deep were drilled eight feet apart, about twelve feet back of the ore-bank, and into these were inserted dynamite cartridges. The blast would dislodge thirty to thirty-five thousand tons of rock, which was scooped up by great steam-shovels and loaded on to skips carried by a line of cars on a narrow-gauge railroad running to and from the crushing mill. Here the material was automatically delivered to the giant rolls. The problem included handling and crushing the "run of the mine," without selection. The steam-shovel did not discriminate, but picked up handily single pieces weighing five or six tons and loaded them on the skips with quantities of smaller lumps. When the skips arrived at the giant rolls, their contents were dumped automatically into a superimposed hopper. The rolls were well named, for with ear-splitting noise they broke up in a few seconds the great pieces of rock tossed in from the skips.
Maybe "quarrying" is a better term than "mining" in this case, since Edison's plan was to approach the rock and break it down completely. The faith that "moves mountains" had a new chance to shine. In this type of work, as mentioned earlier, it had been common to rely on a high explosive, like dynamite, to shatter and break the ore into chunks of a hundred pounds or less. However, he thought that was a very inefficient process, because the energy stored as heat in dynamite at $260 per ton was much more expensive than the energy in a ton of coal at $3 per ton. Therefore, he believed that only minimal work should be done with the costly explosive; he intended to use dynamite just to dislodge large masses of rock and relied on the steam-shovel, powered by coal in the boiler, to move, handle, and remove the rock in detail. This was the plan that was later implemented in the extensive operations at Edison, New Jersey. They drilled a series of three-inch holes, twenty feet deep, eight feet apart, about twelve feet back from the ore bank, and filled these with dynamite cartridges. The blast would dislodge thirty to thirty-five thousand tons of rock, which was then scooped up by massive steam-shovels and loaded onto skips carried by a line of cars on a narrow-gauge railroad running to and from the crushing mill. Here, the material was automatically delivered to the giant rolls. The challenge involved handling and crushing the "run of the mine," without any sorting. The steam-shovel didn’t discriminate; it easily picked up single pieces weighing five or six tons and loaded them into the skips along with smaller lumps. When the skips arrived at the giant rolls, their contents were automatically dumped into a hopper above. The rolls were aptly named, as they produced a deafening noise while breaking up the large pieces of rock dumped in from the skips within seconds.
It is not easy to appreciate to the full the daring exemplified in these great crushing rolls, or rather "rock-crackers," without having watched them in operation delivering their "solar-plexus" blows. It was only as one might stand in their vicinity and hear the thunderous roar accompanying the smashing and rending of the massive rocks as they disappeared from view that the mind was overwhelmed with a sense of the magnificent proportions of this operation. The enormous force exerted during this process may be illustrated from the fact that during its development, in running one of the early forms of rolls, pieces of rock weighing more than half a ton would be shot up in the air to a height of twenty or twenty-five feet.
It's not easy to fully appreciate the boldness shown in these huge crushing rolls, or "rock-crackers," without seeing them in action delivering their powerful blows. Standing near them and hearing the thunderous roar as they smashed and tore through massive rocks that vanished from sight makes you truly grasp the amazing scale of this operation. The incredible force involved can be seen in the fact that when one of the early types of rolls was running, pieces of rock weighing over half a ton would be launched into the air to heights of twenty or twenty-five feet.
The giant rolls were two solid cylinders, six feet in diameter and five feet long, made of cast iron. To the faces of these rolls were bolted a series of heavy, chilled-iron plates containing a number of projecting knobs two inches high. Each roll had also two rows of four-inch knobs, intended to strike a series of hammer-like blows. The rolls were set face to face fourteen inches apart, in a heavy frame, and the total weight was one hundred and thirty tons, of which seventy tons were in moving parts. The space between these two rolls allowed pieces of rock measuring less than fourteen inches to descend to other smaller rolls placed below. The giant rolls were belt-driven, in opposite directions, through friction clutches, although the belt was not depended upon for the actual crushing. Previous to the dumping of a skip, the rolls were speeded up to a circumferential velocity of nearly a mile a minute, thus imparting to them the terrific momentum that would break up easily in a few seconds boulders weighing five or six tons each. It was as though a rock of this size had got in the way of two express trains travelling in opposite directions at nearly sixty miles an hour. In other words, it was the kinetic energy of the rolls that crumbled up the rocks with pile-driver effect. This sudden strain might have tended to stop the engine driving the rolls; but by an ingenious clutch arrangement the belt was released at the moment of resistance in the rolls by reason of the rocks falling between them. The act of breaking and crushing would naturally decrease the tremendous momentum, but after the rock was reduced and the pieces had passed through, the belt would again come into play, and once more speed up the rolls for a repetition of their regular prize-fighter duty.
The giant rolls were two solid cylinders, six feet wide and five feet long, made of cast iron. A series of heavy, chilled-iron plates with knobs sticking out two inches high were bolted to the faces of these rolls. Each roll also had two rows of four-inch knobs designed to deliver hammer-like blows. The rolls were positioned face-to-face, fourteen inches apart, in a sturdy frame, weighing a total of one hundred thirty tons, with seventy tons allocated to moving parts. The gap between the rolls allowed pieces of rock measuring less than fourteen inches to fall to smaller rolls below. The giant rolls were belt-driven in opposite directions using friction clutches, though the belt wasn’t relied upon for actual crushing. Before dumping a skip, the rolls were sped up to nearly a mile a minute, giving them the immense momentum needed to easily crush boulders weighing five or six tons within seconds. It was like a rock of that size had been hit by two express trains traveling towards each other at nearly sixty miles per hour. In other words, the kinetic energy of the rolls shattered the rocks with pile-driver force. This sudden stress could have stopped the engine powering the rolls, but thanks to a clever clutch system, the belt was disengaged when resistance occurred from the rocks falling between them. Breaking and crushing would naturally reduce the massive momentum, but once the rock was crushed and the pieces passed through, the belt would re-engage and speed up the rolls again for another round of their regular prize-fighter task.
On leaving the giant rolls the rocks, having been reduced to pieces not larger than fourteen inches, passed into the series of "Intermediate Rolls" of similar construction and operation, by which they were still further reduced, and again passed on to three other sets of rolls of smaller dimensions. These latter rolls were also face-lined with chilled-iron plates; but, unlike the larger ones, were positively driven, reducing the rock to pieces of about one-half-inch size, or smaller. The whole crushing operation of reduction from massive boulders to small pebbly pieces having been done in less time than the telling has occupied, the product was conveyed to the "Dryer," a tower nine feet square and fifty feet high, heated from below by great open furnace fires. All down the inside walls of this tower were placed cast-iron plates, nine feet long and seven inches wide, arranged alternately in "fish-ladder" fashion. The crushed rock, being delivered at the top, would fall down from plate to plate, constantly exposing different surfaces to the heat, until it landed completely dried in the lower portion of the tower, where it fell into conveyors which took it up to the stock-house.
As the giant rolls exit, the rocks, now broken down to pieces no bigger than fourteen inches, move into the "Intermediate Rolls," which are built and operated the same way, reducing them further. Then, they go through three more sets of rolls with smaller sizes. These smaller rolls are also lined with chilled-iron plates, but unlike the larger ones, they are actively powered, breaking the rock down to pieces about half an inch or smaller. The entire crushing process, from huge boulders to small, pebbly fragments, takes less time than it takes to explain. The resulting product is sent to the "Dryer," a tower measuring nine feet square and fifty feet tall, heated from below by large open furnace flames. Along the inside walls of this tower are cast-iron plates, each nine feet long and seven inches wide, arranged in an alternating "fish-ladder" pattern. The crushed rock is delivered at the top and falls from plate to plate, continuously exposing different surfaces to the heat, until it lands completely dried at the bottom of the tower, where it drops into conveyors that take it up to the stock-house.
This method of drying was original with Edison. At the time this adjunct to the plant was required, the best dryer on the market was of a rotary type, which had a capacity of only twenty tons per hour, with the expenditure of considerable power. As Edison had determined upon treating two hundred and fifty tons or more per hour, he decided to devise an entirely new type of great capacity, requiring a minimum of power (for elevating the material), and depending upon the force of gravity for handling it during the drying process. A long series of experiments resulted in the invention of the tower dryer with a capacity of three hundred tons per hour.
This drying method was invented by Edison. Back then, when this addition to the plant was needed, the best dryer available was a rotary type that could only handle twenty tons per hour and consumed a lot of power. Since Edison wanted to process two hundred and fifty tons or more each hour, he decided to create a completely new high-capacity type that used minimal power (just for moving the material) and relied on gravity to manage it during the drying process. After a long series of experiments, he invented the tower dryer, which could handle three hundred tons per hour.
The rock, broken up into pieces about the size of marbles, having been dried and conveyed to the stock-house, the surplusage was automatically carried out from the other end of the stock-house by conveyors, to pass through the next process, by which it was reduced to a powder. The machinery for accomplishing this result represents another interesting and radical departure of Edison from accepted usage. He had investigated all the crushing-machines on the market, and tried all he could get. He found them all greatly lacking in economy of operation; indeed, the highest results obtainable from the best were 18 per cent. of actual work, involving a loss of 82 per cent. by friction. His nature revolted at such an immense loss of power, especially as he proposed the crushing of vast quantities of ore. Thus, he was obliged to begin again at the foundation, and he devised a crushing-machine which was subsequently named the "Three-High Rolls," and which practically reversed the above figures, as it developed 84 per cent. of work done with only 16 per cent. loss in friction.
The rock, broken into pieces about the size of marbles, was dried and sent to the stockhouse, where the excess was automatically moved out from the other end by conveyors to go through the next process, which turned it into powder. The machinery for this purpose was another interesting and significant shift from traditional methods that Edison introduced. He examined all the crushing machines available on the market and tried everything he could find. He discovered that they were all very inefficient; in fact, the best ones only achieved 18 percent of effective work, losing 82 percent to friction. He found such a massive loss of power unacceptable, especially since he aimed to crush large quantities of ore. Therefore, he had to start from scratch and designed a crushing machine that would later be called the "Three-High Rolls," which effectively reversed those figures, achieving 84 percent of work done with only a 16 percent loss in friction.
A brief description of this remarkable machine will probably interest the reader. In the two end pieces of a heavy iron frame were set three rolls, or cylinders—one in the centre, another below, and the other above—all three being in a vertical line. These rolls were of cast iron three feet in diameter, having chilled-iron smooth face-plates of considerable thickness. The lowest roll was set in a fixed bearing at the bottom of the frame, and, therefore, could only turn around on its axis. The middle and top rolls were free to move up or down from and toward the lower roll, and the shafts of the middle and upper rolls were set in a loose bearing which could slip up and down in the iron frame. It will be apparent, therefore, that any material which passed in between the top and the middle rolls, and the middle and bottom rolls, could be ground as fine as might be desired, depending entirely upon the amount of pressure applied to the loose rolls. In operation the material passed first through the upper and middle rolls, and then between the middle and lowest rolls.
A brief description of this amazing machine will likely catch the reader's interest. In the two end pieces of a heavy iron frame, three rolls, or cylinders, were installed—one in the center, one below, and one above—all aligned vertically. These rolls were made of cast iron and were three feet in diameter, featuring smooth face-plates of chilled iron that were quite thick. The lowest roll was fixed in place at the bottom of the frame, allowing it to only rotate around its axis. The middle and top rolls were able to move up and down relative to the lower roll, with their shafts set in a loose bearing that could slide up and down within the iron frame. It’s clear that any material passing between the top and middle rolls, and between the middle and bottom rolls, could be ground as finely as needed, depending entirely on the pressure applied to the loose rolls. During operation, the material first went through the upper and middle rolls, and then between the middle and lowest rolls.
This pressure was applied in a most ingenious manner. On the ends of the shafts of the bottom and top rolls there were cylindrical sleeves, or bearings, having seven sheaves, in which was run a half-inch endless wire rope. This rope was wound seven times over the sheaves as above, and led upward and over a single-groove sheave which was operated by the piston of an air cylinder, and in this manner the pressure was applied to the rolls. It will be seen, therefore, that the system consisted in a single rope passed over sheaves and so arranged that it could be varied in length, thus providing for elasticity in exerting pressure and regulating it as desired. The efficiency of this system was incomparably greater than that of any other known crusher or grinder, for while a pressure of one hundred and twenty-five thousand pounds could be exerted by these rolls, friction was almost entirely eliminated because the upper and lower roll bearings turned with the rolls and revolved in the wire rope, which constituted the bearing proper.
This pressure was applied in a really clever way. On the ends of the shafts of the bottom and top rolls, there were cylindrical sleeves or bearings with seven sheaves, through which a half-inch endless wire rope ran. This rope was wrapped around the sheaves seven times and led upward over a single-groove sheave powered by an air cylinder piston, applying pressure to the rolls. Therefore, the system involved a single rope passing over sheaves, allowing it to be adjusted in length, which provided flexibility in applying pressure and regulating it as needed. The efficiency of this system was far greater than any other crusher or grinder known at the time, since these rolls could exert a pressure of one hundred twenty-five thousand pounds, while nearly all friction was eliminated because the upper and lower roll bearings rotated with the rolls and moved within the wire rope, which acted as the main bearing.
The same cautious foresight exercised by Edison in providing a safety device—the fuse—to prevent fires in his electric-light system, was again displayed in this concentrating plant, where, to save possible injury to its expensive operating parts, he devised an analogous factor, providing all the crushing machinery with closely calculated "safety pins," which, on being overloaded, would shear off and thus stop the machine at once.
The same careful planning that Edison used when he created a safety device—the fuse—to prevent fires in his electric light system was once again evident in this concentrating plant. To protect its costly operating parts from potential damage, he came up with a similar solution, equipping all the crushing machinery with precisely designed "safety pins" that would break off if overloaded, immediately halting the machine.
The rocks having thus been reduced to fine powder, the mass was ready for screening on its way to the magnetic separators. Here again Edison reversed prior practice by discarding rotary screens and devising a form of tower screen, which, besides having a very large working capacity by gravity, eliminated all power except that required to elevate the material. The screening process allowed the finest part of the crushed rock to pass on, by conveyor belts, to the magnetic separators, while the coarser particles were in like manner automatically returned to the rolls for further reduction.
Once the rocks were finely ground into powder, the material was ready to be screened on its way to the magnetic separators. Edison changed things up by getting rid of rotary screens and creating a type of tower screen that not only had a large capacity thanks to gravity but also used no power except for lifting the material. The screening process allowed the finest crushed rock to move forward via conveyor belts to the magnetic separators, while the larger particles were automatically sent back to the rolls for more grinding.
In a narrative not intended to be strictly technical, it would probably tire the reader to follow this material in detail through the numerous steps attending the magnetic separation. These may be seen in a diagram reproduced from the above-named article in the Iron Age, and supplemented by the following extract from the Electrical Engineer, New York, October 28, 1897: "At the start the weakest magnet at the top frees the purest particles, and the second takes care of others; but the third catches those to which rock adheres, and will extract particles of which only one-eighth is iron. This batch of material goes back for another crushing, so that everything is subjected to an equality of refining. We are now in sight of the real 'concentrates,' which are conveyed to dryer No. 2 for drying again, and are then delivered to the fifty-mesh screens. Whatever is fine enough goes through to the eight-inch magnets, and the remainder goes back for recrushing. Below the eight-inch magnets the dust is blown out of the particles mechanically, and they then go to the four-inch magnets for final cleansing and separation.... Obviously, at each step the percentage of felspar and phosphorus is less and less until in the final concentrates the percentage of iron oxide is 91 to 93 per cent. As intimated at the outset, the tailings will be 75 per cent. of the rock taken from the veins of ore, so that every four tons of crude, raw, low-grade ore will have yielded roughly one ton of high-grade concentrate and three tons of sand, the latter also having its value in various ways."
In a story that isn’t meant to be overly technical, it might bore the reader to get into the nitty-gritty of the various steps involved in magnetic separation. You can see these steps in a diagram taken from the previously mentioned article in Iron Age, along with the following snippet from the Electrical Engineer, New York, October 28, 1897: "Initially, the weakest magnet at the top frees the purest particles, and the second magnet handles the next ones; however, the third magnet catches those that cling to rock, and can extract particles that are only one-eighth iron. This batch of material goes back for another crushing, ensuring that everything undergoes an equal refining process. We are now approaching the actual 'concentrates,' which are sent to dryer No. 2 for another round of drying before being moved to the fifty-mesh screens. Anything small enough passes through to the eight-inch magnets, while the leftover material is sent back for recrushing. Below the eight-inch magnets, dust is mechanically blown out of the particles, and then they go to the four-inch magnets for final cleaning and separation.... Clearly, at each stage, the amount of felspar and phosphorus decreases until the final concentrates contain 91 to 93 percent iron oxide. As mentioned earlier, the tailings will be 75 percent of the rock extracted from the ore veins, meaning that every four tons of raw, low-grade ore will roughly yield one ton of high-grade concentrate and three tons of sand, which also has its value in various ways."
This sand was transported automatically by belt conveyors to the rear of the works to be stored and sold. Being sharp, crystalline, and even in quality, it was a valuable by-product, finding a ready sale for building purposes, railway sand-boxes, and various industrial uses. The concentrate, in fine powdery form, was delivered in similar manner to a stock-house.
This sand was automatically moved by conveyor belts to the back of the facility for storage and sale. Its sharp, crystalline quality made it a valuable by-product, with a strong demand for construction, railway sandboxes, and various industrial applications. The concentrate, in a fine powdery form, was delivered in the same way to a storage facility.
As to the next step in the process, we may now quote again from the article in the Iron Age: "While Mr. Edison and his associates were working on the problem of cheap concentration of iron ore, an added difficulty faced them in the preparation of the concentrates for the market. Furnacemen object to more than a very small proportion of fine ore in their mixtures, particularly when the ore is magnetic, not easily reduced. The problem to be solved was to market an agglomerated material so as to avoid the drawbacks of fine ore. The agglomerated product must be porous so as to afford access of the furnace-reducing gases to the ore. It must be hard enough to bear transportation, and to carry the furnace burden without crumbling to pieces. It must be waterproof, to a certain extent, because considerations connected with securing low rates of freight make it necessary to be able to ship the concentrates to market in open coal cars, exposed to snow and rain. In many respects the attainment of these somewhat conflicting ends was the most perplexing of the problems which confronted Mr. Edison. The agglomeration of the concentrates having been decided upon, two other considerations, not mentioned above, were of primary importance—first, to find a suitable cheap binding material; and, second, its nature must be such that very little would be necessary per ton of concentrates. These severe requirements were staggering, but Mr. Edison's courage did not falter. Although it seemed a well-nigh hopeless task, he entered upon the investigation with his usual optimism and vim. After many months of unremitting toil and research, and the trial of thousands of experiments, the goal was reached in the completion of a successful formula for agglomerating the fine ore and pressing it into briquettes by special machinery."
As for the next step in the process, we can again quote from the article in the Iron Age: "While Mr. Edison and his team were tackling the challenge of making iron ore concentration affordable, they faced an additional issue in preparing the concentrates for the market. Furnace operators only want a very small amount of fine ore in their mixtures, especially when the ore is magnetic and hard to reduce. The task at hand was to market a compacted material that would avoid the downsides of fine ore. The agglomerated product needed to be porous enough to allow the furnace-reducing gases to reach the ore. It also had to be strong enough to withstand transportation and support the load in the furnace without falling apart. It needed to be somewhat waterproof because shipping the concentrates to market in open coal cars, exposed to snow and rain, required it. In many ways, achieving these somewhat conflicting goals was one of the most challenging problems Mr. Edison faced. Once they decided on agglomerating the concentrates, two additional considerations, not mentioned earlier, were critically important: first, finding a suitable, inexpensive binding material; and second, ensuring that only a small amount was needed per ton of concentrates. These demanding requirements were overwhelming, but Mr. Edison’s determination never wavered. Even though it felt like a nearly impossible task, he approached the investigation with his usual optimism and energy. After months of relentless hard work and experimentation, and testing thousands of different methods, they finally succeeded in creating an effective formula for agglomerating the fine ore and pressing it into briquettes using specialized machinery."
This was the final process requisite for the making of a completed commercial product. Its practice, of course, necessitated the addition of an entirely new department of the works, which was carried into effect by the construction and installation of the novel mixing and briquetting machinery, together with extensions of the conveyors, with which the plant had already been liberally provided.
This was the last step needed to create a finished commercial product. Its implementation required adding a completely new department to the facility, which was achieved by building and installing new mixing and briquetting machines, along with extending the conveyors that the plant already had in place.
Briefly described, the process consisted in mixing the concentrates with the special binding material in machines of an entirely new type, and in passing the resultant pasty mass into the briquetting machines, where it was pressed into cylindrical cakes three inches in diameter and one and a half inches thick, under successive pressures of 7800, 14,000, and 60,000 pounds. Each machine made these briquettes at the rate of sixty per minute, and dropped them into bucket conveyors by which they were carried into drying furnaces, through which they made five loops, and were then delivered to cross-conveyors which carried them into the stock-house. At the end of this process the briquettes were so hard that they would not break or crumble in loading on the cars or in transportation by rail, while they were so porous as to be capable of absorbing 26 per cent. of their own volume in alcohol, but repelling water absolutely—perfect "old soaks."
In short, the process involved mixing the concentrates with a special binding material in entirely new machines, then transferring the resulting paste into briquetting machines, where it was pressed into cylindrical cakes three inches in diameter and one and a half inches thick, under successive pressures of 7,800, 14,000, and 60,000 pounds. Each machine produced these briquettes at a rate of sixty per minute, dropping them into bucket conveyors that carried them into drying furnaces, where they made five loops, and then delivered to cross-conveyors that moved them into the stockhouse. By the end of this process, the briquettes were so hard that they wouldn’t break or crumble during loading onto cars or when transported by rail, while being porous enough to absorb 26 percent of their own volume in alcohol, but completely repellent to water—perfect "old soaks."
Thus, with never-failing persistence and patience, coupled with intense thought and hard work, Edison met and conquered, one by one, the complex difficulties that confronted him. He succeeded in what he had set out to do, and it is now to be noted that the product he had striven so sedulously to obtain was a highly commercial one, for not only did the briquettes of concentrated ore fulfil the purpose of their creation, but in use actually tended to increase the working capacity of the furnace, as the following test, quoted from the Iron Age, October 28, 1897, will attest: "The only trial of any magnitude of the briquettes in the blast-furnace was carried through early this year at the Crane Iron Works, Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, by Leonard Peckitt.
With unwavering persistence and patience, along with deep thinking and hard work, Edison faced and overcame one by one the complex challenges that came his way. He achieved what he aimed to do, and it's worth noting that the product he worked so diligently to create was highly marketable. The briquettes of concentrated ore not only served their intended purpose but also enhanced the furnace's efficiency when in use. As evidenced by the following test, mentioned in the Iron Age on October 28, 1897: "The only significant trial of the briquettes in the blast furnace took place earlier this year at the Crane Iron Works, Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, conducted by Leonard Peckitt."
"The furnace at which the test was made produces from one hundred to one hundred and ten tons per day when running on the ordinary mixture. The charging of briquettes was begun with a percentage of 25 per cent., and was carried up to 100 per cent. The following is the record of the results:
"The furnace used for the test produces between one hundred to one hundred and ten tons each day when operating on the standard mix. The process of charging briquettes started at a 25 percent ratio and was increased to 100 percent. Here are the recorded results:"
RESULTS OF WORKING BRIQUETTES AT THE CRANE FURNACE
RESULTS OF WORKING BRIQUETTES AT THE CRANE FURNACE
Quantity of Phos- ManDate Briquette Tons Silica phorus Sulphur ganese Working Per Cent. January 5th 25 104 2.770 0.830 0.018 0.500 January 6th 37 1/2 4 1/2 2.620 0 740 0.018 0.350 January 7th 50 138 1/2 2.572 0.580 0.015 0.200 January 8th 75 119 1.844 0.264 0.022 0.200 January 9th 100 138 1/2 1.712 0.147 0.038 0.185
Quantity of Phos- ManDate Briquette Tons Silica phorus Sulphur ganese Working Per Cent. January 5th 25 104 2.770 0.830 0.018 0.500 January 6th 37.5 4.5 2.620 0.740 0.018 0.350 January 7th 50 138.5 2.572 0.580 0.015 0.200 January 8th 75 119 1.844 0.264 0.022 0.200 January 9th 100 138.5 1.712 0.147 0.038 0.185
"On the 9th, at 5 P.M., the briquettes having been nearly exhausted, the percentage was dropped to 25 per cent., and on the 10th the output dropped to 120 tons, and on the 11th the furnace had resumed the usual work on the regular standard ores.
"On the 9th, at 5 P.M., the briquettes were almost used up, so the percentage was reduced to 25 percent. By the 10th, the output fell to 120 tons, and on the 11th, the furnace went back to normal operations with the regular standard ores."
"These figures prove that the yield of the furnace is considerably increased. The Crane trial was too short to settle the question to what extent the increase in product may be carried. This increase in output, of course, means a reduction in the cost of labor and of general expenses.
"These numbers show that the furnace's output has significantly increased. The Crane trial was too brief to determine how far this increase in production can go. This rise in output, of course, leads to lower labor costs and overall expenses."
"The richness of the ore and its purity of course affect the limestone consumption. In the case of the Crane trial there was a reduction from 30 per cent. to 12 per cent. of the ore charge.
"The richness of the ore and its purity, of course, affect how much limestone is used. In the Crane trial, there was a drop from 30 percent to 12 percent of the ore charge."
"Finally, the fuel consumption is reduced, which in the case of the Eastern plants, with their relatively costly coke, is a very important consideration. It is regarded as possible that Eastern furnaces will be able to use a smaller proportion of the costlier coke and correspondingly increase in anthracite coal, which is a cheaper fuel in that section. So far as foundry iron is concerned, the experience at Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, brief as it has been, shows that a stronger and tougher metal is made."
"Finally, fuel consumption is lowered, which is a significant concern for the Eastern plants that rely on relatively expensive coke. It's likely that Eastern furnaces will use less of the costly coke and increase their use of anthracite coal, which is a more affordable fuel in that area. Regarding foundry iron, the limited experience at Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, indicates that a stronger and tougher metal is produced."
Edison himself tells an interesting little story in this connection, when he enjoyed the active help of that noble character, John Fritz, the distinguished inventor and pioneer of the modern steel industry in America. He says: "When I was struggling along with the iron-ore concentration, I went to see several blast-furnace men to sell the ore at the market price. They saw I was very anxious to sell it, and they would take advantage of my necessity. But I happened to go to Mr. John Fritz, of the Bethlehem Steel Company, and told him what I was doing. 'Well,' he said to me, 'Edison, you are doing a good thing for the Eastern furnaces. They ought to help you, for it will help us out. I am willing to help you. I mix a little sentiment with business, and I will give you an order for one hundred thousand tons.' And he sat right down and gave me the order."
Edison shares an interesting story about his experience when he got support from the remarkable John Fritz, a famous inventor and pioneer of the modern steel industry in America. He recounts: "When I was working on concentrating iron ore, I went to talk to several blast-furnace operators to sell the ore at market price. They noticed I was really eager to sell it, and they took advantage of my situation. But then I went to see Mr. John Fritz from the Bethlehem Steel Company and explained what I was trying to do. 'Well,' he said to me, 'Edison, you’re doing something beneficial for the Eastern furnaces. They should support you because it will benefit us too. I'm willing to help you. I mix a little sentiment with business, and I’ll place an order for one hundred thousand tons.' And he immediately sat down and placed the order."
The Edison concentrating plant has been sketched in the briefest outline with a view of affording merely a bare idea of the great work of its projector. To tell the whole story in detail and show its logical sequence, step by step, would take little less than a volume in itself, for Edison's methods, always iconoclastic when progress is in sight, were particularly so at the period in question. It has been said that "Edison's scrap-heap contains the elements of a liberal education," and this was essentially true of the "discard" during the ore-milling experience. Interesting as it might be to follow at length the numerous phases of ingenious and resourceful development that took place during those busy years, the limit of present space forbids their relation. It would, however, be denying the justice that is Edison's due to omit all mention of two hitherto unnamed items in particular that have added to the world's store of useful devices. We refer first to the great travelling hoisting-crane having a span of two hundred and fifteen feet, and used for hoisting loads equal to ten tons, this being the largest of the kind made up to that time, and afterward used as a model by many others. The second item was the ingenious and varied forms of conveyor belt, devised and used by Edison at the concentrating works, and subsequently developed into a separate and extensive business by an engineer to whom he gave permission to use his plans and patterns.
The Edison concentrating plant has been outlined briefly to provide just a basic idea of the significant work of its creator. To explain the entire story in detail and show its logical progression, step by step, would take nearly a whole book, as Edison's methods, always innovative when progress was within reach, were particularly so during that time. It's been said that "Edison's scrap-heap contains the elements of a liberal education," and this was especially true of the "discard" during the ore-milling process. While it would be fascinating to explore the many clever and resourceful developments that occurred during those busy years, the current space constraints prevent a full account. However, it wouldn't be fair to Edison's legacy to leave out two specific innovations that contributed to the world's collection of useful devices. First, there's the impressive traveling hoisting crane with a span of two hundred and fifteen feet, capable of lifting loads up to ten tons; this was the largest of its kind made at that time and later served as a model for many others. The second item was the clever and diverse designs of conveyor belts created and used by Edison at the concentrating works, which were later developed into a separate and extensive business by an engineer whom he allowed to use his plans and patterns.
Edison's native shrewdness and knowledge of human nature was put to practical use in the busy days of plant construction. It was found impossible to keep mechanics on account of indifferent residential accommodations afforded by the tiny village, remote from civilization, among the central mountains of New Jersey. This puzzling question was much discussed between him and his associate, Mr. W. S. Mallory, until finally he said to the latter: "If we want to keep the men here we must make it attractive for the women—so let us build some houses that will have running water and electric lights, and rent at a low rate." He set to work, and in a day finished a design for a type of house. Fifty were quickly built and fully described in advertising for mechanics. Three days' advertisements brought in over six hundred and fifty applications, and afterward Edison had no trouble in obtaining all the first-class men he required, as settlers in the artificial Yosemite he was creating.
Edison's natural insight and understanding of people were put to practical use during the hectic days of building the plant. It became impossible to keep workers because the small village, far from civilization, offered poor living conditions. This puzzling issue was discussed extensively between him and his associate, Mr. W. S. Mallory, until Edison finally said, "If we want to keep the workers here, we need to make it appealing for the women—so let's build some houses with running water and electric lights, and rent them at a low price." He went to work, and within a day, he completed a design for a type of house. Fifty were quickly constructed and advertised for mechanics. Three days of advertising resulted in over six hundred and fifty applications, and afterward, Edison had no trouble attracting all the high-quality workers he needed as residents in the artificial Yosemite he was creating.
We owe to Mr. Mallory a characteristic story of this period as to an incidental unbending from toil, which in itself illustrates the ever-present determination to conquer what is undertaken: "Along in the latter part of the nineties, when the work on the problem of concentrating iron ore was in progress, it became necessary when leaving the plant at Edison to wait over at Lake Hopatcong one hour for a connecting train. During some of these waits Mr. Edison had seen me play billiards. At the particular time this incident happened, Mrs. Edison and her family were away for the summer, and I was staying at the Glenmont home on the Orange Mountains.
We owe Mr. Mallory a typical story from this time about a brief break from hard work, which shows the constant drive to overcome challenges: "In the late 1890s, while working on the problem of concentrating iron ore, I had to wait for an hour at Lake Hopatcong for a connecting train after leaving the plant in Edison. During some of these waits, Mr. Edison had seen me play billiards. At the time this incident took place, Mrs. Edison and her family were away for the summer, and I was staying at the Glenmont home on the Orange Mountains."
"One hot Saturday night, after Mr. Edison had looked over the evening papers, he said to me: 'Do you want to play a game of billiards?' Naturally this astonished me very much, as he is a man who cares little or nothing for the ordinary games, with the single exception of parcheesi, of which he is very fond. I said I would like to play, so we went up into the billiard-room of the house. I took off the cloth, got out the balls, picked out a cue for Mr. Edison, and when we banked for the first shot I won and started the game. After making two or three shots I missed, and a long carom shot was left for Mr. Edison, the cue ball and object ball being within about twelve inches of each other, and the other ball a distance of nearly the length of the table. Mr. Edison attempted to make the shot, but missed it and said 'Put the balls back.' So I put them back in the same position and he missed it the second time. I continued at his request to put the balls back in the same position for the next fifteen minutes, until he could make the shot every time—then he said: 'I don't want to play any more.'"
"One hot Saturday night, after Mr. Edison had gone through the evening papers, he said to me, 'Do you want to play a game of billiards?' I was really surprised because he doesn’t usually care for typical games, except for parcheesi, which he enjoys a lot. I said I would like to play, so we went up to the billiard room in the house. I took off the cover, got the balls out, found a cue for Mr. Edison, and when we lined up for the first shot, I won and started the game. After making a couple of shots, I missed, leaving a long carom shot for Mr. Edison, with the cue ball and object ball about twelve inches apart and the other ball nearly the length of the table away. Mr. Edison tried to take the shot but missed and said, 'Put the balls back.' So I put them back in the same position, and he missed again. I kept putting the balls back in the same spot for the next fifteen minutes until he could make the shot every time—then he said, 'I don’t want to play anymore.'"
Having taken a somewhat superficial survey of the great enterprise under consideration; having had a cursory glance at the technical development of the plant up to the point of its successful culmination in the making of a marketable, commercial product as exemplified in the test at the Crane Furnace, let us revert to that demonstration and note the events that followed. The facts of this actual test are far more eloquent than volumes of argument would be as a justification of Edison's assiduous labors for over eight years, and of the expenditure of a fortune in bringing his broad conception to a concrete possibility. In the patient solving of tremendous problems he had toiled up the mountain-side of success—scaling its topmost peak and obtaining a view of the boundless prospect. But, alas! "The best laid plans o' mice and men gang aft agley." The discovery of great deposits of rich Bessemer ore in the Mesaba range of mountains in Minnesota a year or two previous to the completion of his work had been followed by the opening up of those deposits and the marketing of the ore. It was of such rich character that, being cheaply mined by greatly improved and inexpensive methods, the market price of crude ore of like iron units fell from about $6.50 to $3.50 per ton at the time when Edison was ready to supply his concentrated product. At the former price he could have supplied the market and earned a liberal profit on his investment, but at $3.50 per ton he was left without a reasonable chance of competition. Thus was swept away the possibility of reaping the reward so richly earned by years of incessant thought, labor, and care. This great and notable plant, representing a very large outlay of money, brought to completion, ready for business, and embracing some of the most brilliant and remarkable of Edison's inventions and methods, must be abandoned by force of circumstances over which he had no control, and with it must die the high hopes that his progressive, conquering march to success had legitimately engendered.
After taking a brief look at the significant project we're discussing, and having seen the technical development of the plant lead to its successful achievement in producing a market-ready product, as shown in the test at the Crane Furnace, let's go back to that demonstration and review the events that followed. The facts from this actual test speak more powerfully than pages of argument justifying Edison's tireless efforts for over eight years and the fortune spent to turn his broad vision into a tangible reality. In patiently tackling massive challenges, he worked hard to reach the peak of success, gaining a view of endless possibilities. But, unfortunately, "the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry." The discovery of large deposits of high-quality Bessemer ore in the Mesaba mountain range of Minnesota a year or two before his project was completed led to the opening of those deposits and the selling of the ore. It was so valuable that, being easily mined with improved and cost-effective methods, the market price of raw ore with similar iron content dropped from about $6.50 to $3.50 per ton right when Edison was ready to offer his refined product. At the former price, he could have supplied the market and made a good profit on his investment, but at $3.50 per ton, he had no real chance of competing. Thus, the potential for reaping the rewards he had worked so hard for was lost. This impressive and significant plant, which represented a substantial financial investment and was completed, ready for operation, featuring some of Edison's most brilliant inventions and methods, had to be abandoned due to circumstances beyond his control, along with the high hopes that his successful journey had rightfully inspired.
The financial aspect of these enterprises is often overlooked and forgotten. In this instance it was of more than usual import and seriousness, as Edison was virtually his own "backer," putting into the company almost the whole of all the fortune his inventions had brought him. There is a tendency to deny to the capital that thus takes desperate chances its full reward if things go right, and to insist that it shall have barely the legal rate of interest and far less than the return of over-the-counter retail trade. It is an absolute fact that the great electrical inventors and the men who stood behind them have had little return for their foresight and courage. In this instance, when the inventor was largely his own financier, the difficulties and perils were redoubled. Let Mr. Mallory give an instance: "During the latter part of the panic of 1893 there came a period when we were very hard up for ready cash, due largely to the panicky conditions; and a large pay-roll had been raised with considerable difficulty. A short time before pay-day our treasurer called me up by telephone, and said: 'I have just received the paid checks from the bank, and I am fearful that my assistant, who has forged my name to some of the checks, has absconded with about $3000.' I went immediately to Mr. Edison and told him of the forgery and the amount of money taken, and in what an embarrassing position we were for the next pay-roll. When I had finished he said: 'It is too bad the money is gone, but I will tell you what to do. Go and see the president of the bank which paid the forged checks. Get him to admit the bank's liability, and then say to him that Mr. Edison does not think the bank should suffer because he happened to have a dishonest clerk in his employ. Also say to him that I shall not ask them to make the amount good.' This was done; the bank admitting its liability and being much pleased with this action. When I reported to Mr. Edison he said: 'That's all right. We have made a friend of the bank, and we may need friends later on.' And so it happened that some time afterward, when we greatly needed help in the way of loans, the bank willingly gave us the accommodations we required to tide us over a critical period."
The financial side of these businesses is often neglected and forgotten. In this case, it was especially important and serious, since Edison was essentially his own "investor," putting almost his entire fortune from his inventions into the company. There’s a tendency to overlook the capital that takes such risky chances, giving it barely the legal rate of interest and much less than the returns from regular retail sales. It’s a fact that the major electrical inventors and the people who supported them received little in return for their vision and bravery. In this case, when the inventor was mainly his own financier, the challenges and risks were even greater. Let Mr. Mallory share an example: "During the latter part of the panic of 1893, we faced a time when we were really struggling to find cash, mostly due to the frantic conditions; and we had built up a large payroll with quite a bit of effort. A short time before payday, our treasurer called me on the phone and said, 'I just got the cashed checks from the bank, and I'm worried that my assistant, who has forged my name on some of the checks, has run off with about $3000.' I immediately went to Mr. Edison and told him about the forgery, the amount of money taken, and how embarrassing our situation was for the next payroll. When I finished, he said, 'It’s unfortunate that the money is gone, but here’s what I suggest. Go see the president of the bank that paid the forged checks. Get him to acknowledge the bank's responsibility, and let him know that Mr. Edison believes the bank shouldn't suffer because of having an untrustworthy clerk in its employment. Also tell him that I won’t ask them to cover the amount.' This was done; the bank accepted its liability and was pleased with this approach. When I reported back to Mr. Edison, he said, 'That’s fine. We’ve made a friend of the bank, and we may need friends later.' And it turned out that sometime later, when we really needed help with loans, the bank gladly provided us with the support we needed to get through a tough time."
This iron-ore concentrating project had lain close to Edison's heart and ambition—indeed, it had permeated his whole being to the exclusion of almost all other investigations or inventions for a while. For five years he had lived and worked steadily at Edison, leaving there only on Saturday night to spend Sunday at his home in Orange, and returning to the plant by an early train on Monday morning. Life at Edison was of the simple kind—work, meals, and a few hours' sleep—day by day. The little village, called into existence by the concentrating works, was of the most primitive nature and offered nothing in the way of frivolity or amusement. Even the scenery is austere. Hence Edison was enabled to follow his natural bent in being surrounded day and night by his responsible chosen associates, with whom he worked uninterrupted by outsiders from early morning away into the late hours of the evening. Those who were laboring with him, inspired by his unflagging enthusiasm, followed his example and devoted all their long waking hours to the furtherance of his plans with a zeal that ultimately bore fruit in the practical success here recorded.
This iron-ore concentrating project was incredibly important to Edison—so much so that it took over his life, pushing aside almost all other research or inventions for a time. For five years, he worked steadily at Edison, only leaving on Saturday nights to spend Sundays at his home in Orange, and returning to the plant early Monday morning. Life at Edison was simple—work, meals, and a few hours of sleep, day after day. The small village that sprang up around the concentrating works was very basic and offered no distractions or entertainment. Even the surroundings were bleak. This allowed Edison to pursue his natural inclinations, surrounded day and night by his dedicated team, working together without interruptions from outsiders from early morning until late at night. His team, inspired by his boundless enthusiasm, followed his lead and devoted all their waking hours to supporting his plans with a passion that ultimately led to the practical success noted here.
In view of its present status, this colossal enterprise at Edison may well be likened to the prologue of a play that is to be subsequently enacted for the benefit of future generations, but before ringing down the curtain it is desirable to preserve the unities by quoting the words of one of the principal actors, Mr. Mallory, who says: "The Concentrating Works had been in operation, and we had produced a considerable quantity of the briquettes, and had been able to sell only a portion of them, the iron market being in such condition that blast-furnaces were not making any new purchases of iron ore, and were having difficulty to receive and consume the ores which had been previously contracted for, so what sales we were able to make were at extremely low prices, my recollection being that they were between $3.50 and $3.80 per ton, whereas when the works had started we had hoped to obtain $6.00 to $6.50 per ton for the briquettes. We had also thoroughly investigated the wonderful deposit at Mesaba, and it was with the greatest possible reluctance that Mr. Edison was able to come finally to the conclusion that, under existing conditions, the concentrating plant could not then be made a commercial success. This decision was reached only after the most careful investigations and calculations, as Mr. Edison was just as full of fight and ambition to make it a success as when he first started.
Considering its current situation, this massive project at Edison might be compared to the beginning of a play that will eventually be performed for future generations. However, before we conclude, it's important to maintain the unities by quoting one of the key figures, Mr. Mallory, who states: "The Concentrating Works had been running, and we had produced a significant amount of briquettes, but we were only able to sell a small portion of them. The iron market was in such a state that blast furnaces weren't making any new purchases of iron ore and were struggling to receive and use the ores they had already contracted for. So, the sales we managed to make were at very low prices; I remember they were between $3.50 and $3.80 per ton, while when we started the works, we hoped to get $6.00 to $6.50 per ton for the briquettes. We also thoroughly examined the incredible deposit at Mesaba, and it was with great reluctance that Mr. Edison ultimately concluded that, given the current conditions, the concentrating plant couldn't succeed commercially. This decision came only after meticulous investigations and calculations, as Mr. Edison was just as determined and ambitious to make it a success as he was when he first began."
"When this decision was reached Mr. Edison and I took the Jersey Central train from Edison, bound for Orange, and I did not look forward to the immediate future with any degree of confidence, as the concentrating plant was heavily in debt, without any early prospect of being able to pay off its indebtedness. On the train the matter of the future was discussed, and Mr. Edison said that, inasmuch as we had the knowledge gained from our experience in the concentrating problem, we must, if possible, apply it to some practical use, and at the same time we must work out some other plans by which we could make enough money to pay off the Concentrating Company's indebtedness, Mr. Edison stating most positively that no company with which he had personally been actively connected had ever failed to pay its debts, and he did not propose to have the Concentrating Company any exception.
"When we made this decision, Mr. Edison and I took the Jersey Central train from Edison to Orange. I didn't feel very confident about the immediate future, since the concentrating plant was deeply in debt and there was no quick way to pay it off. On the train, we talked about what lay ahead, and Mr. Edison mentioned that since we had learned so much from our experiences with the concentrating problem, we should try to put that knowledge to practical use. At the same time, we needed to come up with other plans to generate enough money to settle the Concentrating Company's debts. Mr. Edison firmly asserted that every company he had been involved with had always managed to settle its debts, and he intended for the Concentrating Company to be no different."
"In the discussion that followed he suggested several kinds of work which he had in his mind, and which might prove profitable. We figured carefully over the probabilities of financial returns from the Phonograph Works and other enterprises, and after discussing many plans, it was finally decided that we would apply the knowledge we had gained in the concentrating plant by building a plant for manufacturing Portland cement, and that Mr. Edison would devote his attention to the developing of a storage battery which did not use lead and sulphuric acid. So these two lines of work were taken up by Mr. Edison with just as much enthusiasm and energy as is usual with him, the commercial failure of the concentrating plant seeming not to affect his spirits in any way. In fact, I have often been impressed strongly with the fact that, during the dark days of the concentrating problem, Mr. Edison's desire was very strong that the creditors of the Concentrating Works should be paid in full; and only once did I hear him make any reference to the financial loss which he himself made, and he then said: 'As far as I am concerned, I can any time get a job at $75 per month as a telegrapher, and that will amply take care of all my personal requirements.' As already stated, however, he started in with the maximum amount of enthusiasm and ambition, and in the course of about three years we succeeded in paying off all the indebtedness of the Concentrating Works, which amounted to several hundred thousand dollars.
In the following discussion, he suggested various types of work that he had in mind and that could be profitable. We carefully analyzed the potential financial returns from the Phonograph Works and other ventures. After discussing many plans, we ultimately decided to apply the knowledge we gained at the concentrating plant by building a facility to manufacture Portland cement. Mr. Edison would focus on developing a storage battery that didn’t use lead or sulfuric acid. So, Mr. Edison approached these two projects with the same enthusiasm and energy he usually has, and the commercial failure of the concentrating plant didn’t seem to dampen his spirits at all. I was often struck by how, during the tough times with the concentrating issue, Mr. Edison was very determined to ensure that the creditors of the Concentrating Works would be paid in full. I only heard him mention his own financial loss once, and when he did, he said, “As far as I’m concerned, I can always find a job as a telegrapher for $75 a month, which would easily cover my personal expenses.” However, as previously mentioned, he jumped into the new projects with the utmost enthusiasm and ambition, and within about three years, we managed to pay off all the debts of the Concentrating Works, which totaled several hundred thousand dollars.
"As to the state of Mr. Edison's mind when the final decision was reached to close down, if he was specially disappointed, there was nothing in his manner to indicate it, his every thought being for the future, and as to what could be done to pull us out of the financial situation in which we found ourselves, and to take advantage of the knowledge which we had acquired at so great a cost."
"When the final decision was made to shut things down, Mr. Edison's mind seemed focused on the future. If he felt particularly disappointed, he didn't show it. His thoughts were all about how to get us out of the tough financial situation we were in and how to leverage the knowledge we had gained at such a great expense."
It will have been gathered that the funds for this great experiment were furnished largely by Edison. In fact, over two million dollars were spent in the attempt. Edison's philosophic view of affairs is given in the following anecdote from Mr. Mallory: "During the boom times of 1902, when the old General Electric stock sold at its high-water mark of about $330, Mr. Edison and I were on our way from the cement plant at New Village, New Jersey, to his home at Orange. When we arrived at Dover, New Jersey, we got a New York newspaper, and I called his attention to the quotation of that day on General Electric. Mr. Edison then asked: 'If I hadn't sold any of mine, what would it be worth to-day?' and after some figuring I replied: 'Over four million dollars.' When Mr. Edison is thinking seriously over a problem he is in the habit of pulling his right eyebrow, which he did now for fifteen or twenty seconds. Then his face lighted up, and he said: 'Well, it's all gone, but we had a hell of a good time spending it.'" With which revelation of an attitude worthy of Mark Tapley himself, this chapter may well conclude.
It’s clear that the funds for this great experiment mainly came from Edison. In fact, over two million dollars were spent trying to make it happen. Edison's philosophical take on things is illustrated in the following story from Mr. Mallory: "During the boom times of 1902, when the old General Electric stock hit its peak at about $330, Mr. Edison and I were on our way from the cement plant at New Village, New Jersey, to his home in Orange. When we got to Dover, New Jersey, we picked up a New York newspaper, and I pointed out the stock price of General Electric that day. Mr. Edison then asked, 'If I hadn’t sold any of mine, what would it be worth today?' After doing some quick math, I replied, 'Over four million dollars.' When Mr. Edison is seriously thinking about a problem, he has a habit of pulling on his right eyebrow, which he did for about fifteen or twenty seconds. Then his face lit up, and he said, 'Well, it's all gone, but we had an amazing time spending it.'" With this revealing attitude worthy of Mark Tapley himself, this chapter may well come to an end.
CHAPTER XX
EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT
NEW developments in recent years have been more striking than the general adoption of cement for structural purposes of all kinds in the United States; or than the increase in its manufacture here. As a material for the construction of office buildings, factories, and dwellings, it has lately enjoyed an extraordinary vogue; yet every indication is confirmatory of the belief that such use has barely begun. Various reasons may be cited, such as the growing scarcity of wood, once the favorite building material in many parts of the country, and the increasing dearness of brick and stone. The fact remains, indisputable, and demonstrated flatly by the statistics of production. In 1902 the American output of cement was placed at about 21,000,000 barrels, valued at over $17,000,000. In 1907 the production is given as nearly 49,000,000 barrels. Here then is an industry that doubled in five years. The average rate of industrial growth in the United States is 10 per cent. a year, or doubling every ten years. It is a singular fact that electricity also so far exceeds the normal rate as to double in value and quantity of output and investment every five years. There is perhaps more than ordinary coincidence in the association of Edison with two such active departments of progress.
NEW developments in recent years have been more remarkable than the widespread use of cement for all kinds of structural purposes in the United States, or the rise in its production here. As a material for building office buildings, factories, and homes, it has recently become incredibly popular; yet every sign suggests that this trend has just begun. Several reasons can be mentioned, such as the growing scarcity of wood, once the go-to building material in many areas of the country, and the rising cost of brick and stone. The undeniable fact, backed up by production statistics, remains clear. In 1902, the American output of cement was about 21,000,000 barrels, valued at over $17,000,000. By 1907, production reached nearly 49,000,000 barrels. Here is an industry that doubled in five years. The average industrial growth rate in the United States is 10 percent per year, meaning it doubles every ten years. It’s noteworthy that electricity also significantly outpaces the normal growth rate, doubling in value, quantity of output, and investment every five years. There may be more than a coincidence in the connection between Edison and these two dynamic areas of progress.
As a purely manufacturing business the general cement industry is one of even remote antiquity, and if Edison had entered into it merely as a commercial enterprise by following paths already so well trodden, the fact would hardly have been worthy of even passing notice. It is not in his nature, however, to follow a beaten track except in regard to the recognition of basic principles; so that while the manufacture of Edison Portland cement embraces the main essentials and familiar processes of cement-making, such as crushing, drying, mixing, roasting, and grinding, his versatility and originality, as exemplified in the conception and introduction of some bold and revolutionary methods and devices, have resulted in raising his plant from the position of an outsider to the rank of the fifth largest producer in the United States, in the short space of five years after starting to manufacture.
As a purely manufacturing business, the general cement industry dates back to ancient times, and if Edison had entered it simply as a commercial venture by following well-trodden paths, it probably wouldn’t have even been worth mentioning. However, it’s not in his nature to take the usual route, except when it comes to recognizing fundamental principles. So, while the production of Edison Portland cement includes the main essentials and familiar processes of cement-making, like crushing, drying, mixing, roasting, and grinding, his versatility and originality—highlighted by the creation and implementation of innovative and groundbreaking methods and tools—have allowed his plant to rise from being an outsider to becoming the fifth largest producer in the United States, just five years after he started manufacturing.
Long before his advent in cement production, Edison had held very pronounced views on the value of that material as the one which would obtain largely for future building purposes on account of its stability. More than twenty-five years ago one of the writers of this narrative heard him remark during a discussion on ancient buildings: "Wood will rot, stone will chip and crumble, bricks disintegrate, but a cement and iron structure is apparently indestructible. Look at some of the old Roman baths. They are as solid as when they were built." With such convictions, and the vast fund of practical knowledge and experience he had gained at Edison in the crushing and manipulation of large masses of magnetic iron ore during the preceding nine years, it is not surprising that on that homeward railway journey, mentioned at the close of the preceding chapter, he should have decided to go into the manufacture of cement, especially in view of the enormous growth of its use for structural purposes during recent times.
Long before he got into cement production, Edison had strong beliefs about the value of this material, seeing it as the key for future construction because of its stability. Over twenty-five years ago, one of the writers of this story heard him say during a discussion about ancient buildings: "Wood will rot, stone will chip and crumble, bricks break apart, but a cement and iron structure seems nearly indestructible. Just look at the old Roman baths. They're as solid as when they were built." With such strong beliefs, and the vast amount of practical knowledge and experience he had gained at Edison from crushing and handling large amounts of magnetic iron ore over the previous nine years, it's no surprise that on that train ride home, mentioned at the end of the last chapter, he decided to go into cement manufacturing, especially given the huge increase in its use for construction in recent times.
The field being a new one to him, Edison followed his usual course of reading up every page of authoritative literature on the subject, and seeking information from all quarters. In the mean time, while he was busy also with his new storage battery, Mr. Mallory, who had been hard at work on the cement plan, announced that he had completed arrangements for organizing a company with sufficient financial backing to carry on the business; concluding with the remark that it was now time to engage engineers to lay out the plant. Edison replied that he intended to do that himself, and invited Mr. Mallory to go with him to one of the draughting-rooms on an upper floor of the laboratory.
Since the field was new to him, Edison followed his usual routine of reading every authoritative resource on the topic and gathering information from all sources. In the meantime, while he was also working on his new storage battery, Mr. Mallory, who had been diligently working on the cement plan, announced that he had finished arrangements to form a company with enough financial support to move the business forward; he concluded by saying that it was now time to hire engineers to design the plant. Edison responded that he planned to handle that himself and invited Mr. Mallory to join him in one of the drafting rooms on an upper floor of the laboratory.
Here he placed a large sheet of paper on a draughting-table, and immediately began to draw out a plan of the proposed works, continuing all day and away into the evening, when he finished; thus completing within the twenty-four hours the full lay-out of the entire plant as it was subsequently installed, and as it has substantially remained in practical use to this time. It will be granted that this was a remarkable engineering feat, especially in view of the fact that Edison was then a new-comer in the cement business, and also that if the plant were to be rebuilt to-day, no vital change would be desirable or necessary. In that one day's planning every part was considered and provided for, from the crusher to the packing-house. From one end to the other, the distance over which the plant stretches in length is about half a mile, and through the various buildings spread over this space there passes, automatically, in course of treatment, a vast quantity of material resulting in the production of upward of two and a quarter million pounds of finished cement every twenty-four hours, seven days in the week.
He placed a large sheet of paper on a drafting table and immediately started drawing a plan for the proposed works, working all day and into the evening until he finished. In just twenty-four hours, he completed the full layout of the entire plant as it was later installed, which has largely remained in practical use to this day. It’s evident that this was an impressive engineering achievement, especially considering that Edison was new to the cement business at the time, and that if the plant were to be rebuilt today, no significant changes would be needed. In that single day of planning, every aspect was accounted for, from the crusher to the packing house. The plant stretches about half a mile in length, and through the various buildings spread across this area, a massive amount of material passes through automatically in the treatment process, resulting in the production of over two and a quarter million pounds of finished cement every twenty-four hours, seven days a week.
In that one day's designing provision was made not only for all important parts, but minor details, such, for instance, as the carrying of all steam, water, and air pipes, and electrical conductors in a large subway running from one end of the plant to the other; and, an oiling system for the entire works. This latter deserves special mention, not only because of its arrangement for thorough lubrication, but also on account of the resultant economy affecting the cost of manufacture.
In just one day of planning, arrangements were made not only for all the key components but also for minor details, such as the installation of steam, water, and air pipes, along with electrical conduits in a large subway running from one end of the facility to the other; and an oiling system for the entire operation. The oiling system is particularly noteworthy, not just for its effective lubrication setup, but also for the cost savings it brings to the manufacturing process.
Edison has strong convictions on the liberal use of lubricants, but argued that in the ordinary oiling of machinery there is great waste, while much dirt is conveyed into the bearings. He therefore planned a system by which the ten thousand bearings in the plant are oiled automatically; requiring the services of only two men for the entire work. This is accomplished by a central pumping and filtering plant and the return of the oil from all parts of the works by gravity. Every bearing is made dust-proof, and is provided with two interior pipes. One is above and the other below the bearing. The oil flows in through the upper pipe, and, after lubricating the shaft, flows out through the lower pipe back to the pumping station, where any dirt is filtered out and the oil returned to circulation. While this system of oiling is not unique, it was the first instance of its adaptation on so large and complete a scale, and illustrates the far-sightedness of his plans.
Edison strongly believed in using lubricants generously, but he argued that the usual oiling of machines leads to significant waste and brings in a lot of dirt into the bearings. So, he developed a system to oil the ten thousand bearings in the plant automatically, requiring only two people to manage the entire process. This works through a central pumping and filtering system that returns the oil from all areas of the plant by gravity. Each bearing is designed to be dust-proof and has two internal pipes. One pipe is positioned above the bearing and the other below it. Oil flows in through the upper pipe, lubricates the shaft, and then exits through the lower pipe back to the pumping station, where any dirt is filtered out and the oil is returned for reuse. While this oiling system isn't unique, it was the first time it was implemented on such a large and comprehensive scale, showcasing the foresight of his plans.
In connection with the adoption of this lubricating system there occurred another instance of his knowledge of materials and intuitive insight into the nature of things. He thought that too frequent circulation of a comparatively small quantity of oil would, to some extent, impair its lubricating qualities, and requested his assistants to verify this opinion by consultation with competent authorities. On making inquiry of the engineers of the Standard Oil Company, his theory was fully sustained. Hence, provision was made for carrying a large stock of oil, and for giving a certain period of rest to that already used.
In connection with adopting this lubricating system, there was another example of his understanding of materials and intuitive insight into how things work. He believed that circulating a relatively small amount of oil too often would somewhat reduce its lubricating properties and asked his assistants to confirm this opinion by consulting with experts. When they inquired with the engineers at the Standard Oil Company, his theory was completely supported. Therefore, arrangements were made to keep a large supply of oil on hand and to allow used oil to rest for a specific period.
A keen appreciation of ultimate success in the production of a fine quality of cement led Edison to provide very carefully in his original scheme for those details that he foresaw would become requisite—such, for instance, as ample stock capacity for raw materials and their automatic delivery in the various stages of manufacture, as well as mixing, weighing, and frequent sampling and analyzing during the progress through the mills. This provision even included the details of the packing-house, and his perspicacity in this case is well sustained from the fact that nine years afterward, in anticipation of building an additional packing-house, the company sent a representative to different parts of the country to examine the systems used by manufacturers in the packing of large quantities of various staple commodities involving somewhat similar problems, and found that there was none better than that devised before the cement plant was started. Hence, the order was given to build the new packing-house on lines similar to those of the old one.
A strong awareness of the importance of producing high-quality cement led Edison to carefully plan for the necessary details in his original scheme—such as having enough storage capacity for raw materials and their automatic delivery during different stages of production, along with mixing, weighing, and frequent sampling and analysis throughout the process in the mills. This planning even extended to the packing-house, and his insight is highlighted by the fact that nine years later, when preparing to build an additional packing-house, the company sent a representative to various locations across the country to check out the systems used by manufacturers for packing large quantities of similar staple goods. They found that none was better than the one he had developed before the cement plant was established. As a result, the decision was made to construct the new packing-house based on the design of the original one.
Among the many innovations appearing in this plant are two that stand out in bold relief as indicating the large scale by which Edison measures his ideas. One of these consists of the crushing and grinding machinery, and the other of the long kilns. In the preceding chapter there has been given a description of the giant rolls, by means of which great masses of rock, of which individual pieces may weigh eight or more tons, are broken and reduced to about a fourteen-inch size. The economy of this is apparent when it is considered that in other cement plants the limit of crushing ability is "one-man size"—that is, pieces not too large for one man to lift.
Among the many innovations seen in this plant, two stand out clearly, showing the scale at which Edison thinks. One is the crushing and grinding machinery, and the other is the long kilns. In the previous chapter, there was a description of the giant rolls that break down huge masses of rock, with individual pieces weighing eight tons or more, reducing them to about fourteen inches in size. The efficiency of this is clear when you consider that in other cement plants, the maximum crushing capability is "one-man size"—meaning pieces that aren’t too big for one person to lift.
The story of the kiln, as told by Mr. Mallory, is illustrative of Edison's tendency to upset tradition and make a radical departure from generally accepted ideas. "When Mr. Edison first decided to go into the cement business, it was on the basis of his crushing-rolls and air separation, and he had every expectation of installing duplicates of the kilns which were then in common use for burning cement. These kilns were usually made of boiler iron, riveted, and were about sixty feet long and six feet in diameter, and had a capacity of about two hundred barrels of cement clinker in twenty-four hours.
The story of the kiln, as told by Mr. Mallory, highlights Edison's tendency to challenge tradition and make a significant break from widely accepted ideas. "When Mr. Edison first decided to enter the cement business, it was based on his crushing-rolls and air separation, and he fully intended to set up copies of the kilns that were commonly used for burning cement at the time. These kilns were typically made of boiler iron, riveted together, and measured about sixty feet long and six feet in diameter, with a capacity of roughly two hundred barrels of cement clinker in twenty-four hours.
"When the detail plans for our plant were being drawn, Mr. Edison and I figured over the coal capacity and coal economy of the sixty-foot kiln, and each time thought that both could he materially bettered. After having gone over this matter several times, he said: 'I believe I can make a kiln which will give an output of one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours.' Although I had then been closely associated with him for ten years and was accustomed to see him accomplish great things, I could not help feeling the improbability of his being able to jump into an old-established industry—as a novice—and start by improving the 'heart' of the production so as to increase its capacity 400 per cent. When I pressed him for an explanation, he was unable to give any definite reasons, except that he felt positive it could be done. In this connection let me say that very many times I have heard Mr. Edison make predictions as to what a certain mechanical device ought to do in the way of output and costs, when his statements did not seem to be even among the possibilities. Subsequently, after more or less experience, these predictions have been verified, and I cannot help coming to the conclusion that he has a faculty, not possessed by the average mortal, of intuitively and correctly sizing up mechanical and commercial possibilities.
"When the detailed plans for our plant were being created, Mr. Edison and I went over the coal capacity and efficiency of the sixty-foot kiln, and each time we felt that both could be significantly improved. After discussing this multiple times, he said, 'I think I can design a kiln that will produce one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours.' Even though I had been closely working with him for ten years and was used to seeing him achieve amazing things, I couldn't shake the feeling that it was unlikely he could jump into a well-established industry—like a newcomer—and start by enhancing the core of production to increase its capacity by 400 percent. When I pressed him for an explanation, he couldn't provide any specific reasons, other than he was confident it could be done. I should mention that I have often heard Mr. Edison make predictions about what a particular mechanical device should be able to achieve in terms of output and costs, even when those statements seemed far-fetched. Later on, after some experience, those predictions often turned out to be accurate, leading me to believe that he has an ability, not typical of most people, to intuitively and accurately assess mechanical and commercial potentials."
"But, returning to the kiln, Mr. Edison went to work immediately and very soon completed the design of a new type which was to be one hundred and fifty feet long and nine feet in diameter, made up in ten-foot sections of cast iron bolted together and arranged to be revolved on fifteen bearings. He had a wooden model made and studied it very carefully, through a series of experiments. These resulted so satisfactorily that this form was finally decided upon, and ultimately installed as part of the plant.
"But, back at the kiln, Mr. Edison got to work right away and soon finished the design for a new type that was meant to be one hundred fifty feet long and nine feet in diameter, made up of ten-foot sections of cast iron bolted together and set to rotate on fifteen bearings. He had a wooden model created and examined it closely through a series of experiments. These turned out so well that this design was ultimately chosen and installed as part of the plant."
"Well, for a year or so the kiln problem was a nightmare to me. When we started up the plant experimentally, and the long kiln was first put in operation, an output of about four hundred barrels in twenty-four hours was obtained. Mr. Edison was more than disappointed at this result. His terse comment on my report was: 'Rotten. Try it again.' When we became a little more familiar with the operation of the kiln we were able to get the output up to about five hundred and fifty barrels, and a little later to six hundred and fifty barrels per day. I would go down to Orange and report with a great deal of satisfaction the increase in output, but Mr. Edison would apparently be very much disappointed, and often said to me that the trouble was not with the kiln, but with our method of operating it; and he would reiterate his first statement that it would make one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours.
For about a year, the kiln issue was a real headache for me. When we first started the plant experimentally and put the long kiln into operation, we managed to produce about four hundred barrels in twenty-four hours. Mr. Edison was extremely disappointed with this result. His blunt comment on my report was: 'Terrible. Try again.' Once we got a better grasp of how to operate the kiln, we increased the output to about five hundred and fifty barrels, and later to six hundred and fifty barrels per day. I would head down to Orange and report the increased output with a lot of satisfaction, but Mr. Edison would still seem quite let down. He often told me that the problem wasn't with the kiln but with how we were operating it, and he would repeat his original claim that it would produce one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours.
"Each time I would return to the plant with the determination to increase the output if possible, and we did increase it to seven hundred and fifty, then to eight hundred and fifty barrels. Every time I reported these increases Mr. Edison would still be disappointed. I said to him several times that if he was so sure the kiln could turn out one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours we would be very glad to have him tell us how to do it, and that we would run it in any way he directed. He replied that he did not know what it was that kept the output down, but he was just as confident as ever that the kiln would make one thousand barrels per day, and that if he had time to work with and watch the kiln it would not take him long to find out the reasons why. He had made a number of suggestions throughout these various trials, however, and, as we continued to operate, we learned additional points in handling, and were able to get the output up to nine hundred barrels, then one thousand, and finally to over eleven hundred barrels per day, thus more than realizing the prediction made by Mr. Edison before even the plans were drawn. It is only fair to say, however, that prolonged experience has led us to the conclusion that the maximum economy in continuous operation of these kilns is obtained by working them at a little less than their maximum capacity.
Every time I returned to the plant, determined to boost output if possible, we managed to increase it to seven hundred and fifty, then to eight hundred and fifty barrels. Each time I reported these increases, Mr. Edison still seemed disappointed. I mentioned to him several times that if he was so sure the kiln could produce one thousand barrels in twenty-four hours, we would love for him to tell us how to do it, and we would run it however he directed. He replied that he didn't know what was keeping the output down, but he was just as confident as ever that the kiln could make one thousand barrels per day, and that if he had time to work with and observe the kiln, he would quickly figure out why. Throughout these trials, he made several suggestions, and as we continued to operate, we learned more about handling the process and managed to ramp up the output to nine hundred barrels, then to one thousand, and finally to over eleven hundred barrels per day, exceeding Mr. Edison’s initial prediction made before the plans were even drawn up. However, it’s only fair to say that prolonged experience has led us to conclude that the most efficient continuous operation of these kilns is achieved by running them at a little less than their maximum capacity.
"It is interesting to note, in connection with the Edison type of kiln, that when the older cement manufacturers first learned of it, they ridiculed the idea universally, and were not slow to predict our early 'finish' as cement manufacturers. The ultimate success of the kiln, however, proved their criticisms to be unwarranted. Once aware of its possibility, some of the cement manufacturers proceeded to avail themselves of the innovation (at first without Mr. Edison's consent), and to-day more than one-half of the Portland cement produced in this country is made in kilns of the Edison type. Old plants are lengthening their kilns wherever practicable, and no wide-awake manufacturer building a modern plant could afford to install other than these long kilns. This invention of Mr. Edison has been recognized by the larger cement manufacturers, and there is every prospect now that the entire trade will take licenses under his kiln patents."
It's interesting to note that when older cement manufacturers first heard about the Edison-type kiln, they completely mocked the idea and quickly predicted our downfall as cement producers. However, the eventual success of the kiln proved their criticisms to be unfounded. Once they realized its potential, some cement manufacturers started using the innovation (initially without Mr. Edison's permission), and today, over half of the Portland cement produced in this country is made in Edison-type kilns. Existing plants are extending their kilns wherever possible, and any forward-thinking manufacturer building a modern plant wouldn't consider anything other than these long kilns. Mr. Edison's invention has been acknowledged by major cement producers, and it's likely that the entire industry will obtain licenses under his kiln patents.
When he decided to go into the cement business, Edison was thoroughly awake to the fact that he was proposing to "butt into" an old-established industry, in which the principal manufacturers were concerns of long standing. He appreciated fully its inherent difficulties, not only in manufacture, but also in the marketing of the product. These considerations, together with his long-settled principle of striving always to make the best, induced him at the outset to study methods of producing the highest quality of product. Thus he was led to originate innovations in processes, some of which have been preserved as trade secrets; but of the others there are two deserving special notice—namely, the accuracy of mixing and the fineness of grinding.
When he decided to enter the cement business, Edison was fully aware that he was about to "jump into" a long-established industry where the main manufacturers were well-established companies. He completely understood the inherent challenges, not only in production but also in selling the product. These factors, along with his long-standing principle of always striving to create the best, motivated him from the beginning to explore ways of producing the highest quality product. This led him to develop innovations in processes, some of which have been kept as trade secrets; however, two specific ones stand out— the precision of mixing and the fineness of grinding.
In cement-making, generally speaking, cement rock and limestone in the rough are mixed together in such relative quantities as may be determined upon in advance by chemical analysis. In many plants this mixture is made by barrow or load units, and may be more or less accurate. Rule-of-thumb methods are never acceptable to Edison, and he devised therefore a system of weighing each part of the mixture, so that it would be correct to a pound, and, even at that, made the device "fool-proof," for as he observed to one of his associates: "The man at the scales might get to thinking of the other fellow's best girl, so fifty or a hundred pounds of rock, more or less, wouldn't make much difference to him." The Edison checking plan embraces two hoppers suspended above two platform scales whose beams are electrically connected with a hopper-closing device by means of needles dipping into mercury cups. The scales are set according to the chemist's weighing orders, and the material is fed into the scales from the hoppers. The instant the beam tips, the connection is broken and the feed stops instantly, thus rendering it impossible to introduce any more material until the charge has been unloaded.
In cement production, generally speaking, cement rock and limestone are mixed together in specific amounts based on prior chemical analysis. In many plants, this mixture is assembled using barrow or load units, which can be somewhat accurate. Edison never accepted rule-of-thumb methods, so he created a system to weigh each part of the mixture to the exact pound. He even made the device "fool-proof," explaining to one of his associates, "The guy at the scales might get distracted thinking about someone else's girlfriend, so fifty or a hundred pounds of rock, more or less, wouldn't really matter to him." Edison's checking plan includes two hoppers above two platform scales, with the scales' beams electrically linked to a hopper-closing device using needles that dip into mercury cups. The scales are calibrated according to the chemist's weighing orders, and material is fed into the scales from the hoppers. The moment the beam tips, the connection is interrupted and the feed stops immediately, preventing any additional material from being added until the charge has been unloaded.
The fine grinding of cement clinker is distinctively Edisonian in both origin and application. As has been already intimated, its author followed a thorough course of reading on the subject long before reaching the actual projection or installation of a plant, and he had found all authorities to agree on one important point—namely, that the value of cement depends upon the fineness to which it is ground. [16] He also ascertained that in the trade the standard of fineness was that 75 per cent. of the whole mass would pass through a 200-mesh screen. Having made some improvements in his grinding and screening apparatus, and believing that in the future engineers, builders, and contractors would eventually require a higher degree of fineness, he determined, in advance of manufacturing, to raise the standard ten points, so that at least 85 per cent. of his product should pass through a 200-mesh screen. This was a bold step to be taken by a new-comer, but his judgment, backed by a full confidence in ability to live up to this standard, has been fully justified in its continued maintenance, despite the early incredulity of older manufacturers as to the possibility of attaining such a high degree of fineness.
The fine grinding of cement clinker is clearly innovative in both its origins and uses. As mentioned before, its creator did extensive research on the topic long before he actually started planning or building a plant. He discovered that all experts agreed on one crucial point—namely, that the quality of cement depends on how finely it is ground. He also found that in the industry, the standard for fineness was that 75 percent of the total mass had to pass through a 200-mesh screen. After making some improvements to his grinding and screening equipment, and believing that in the future engineers, builders, and contractors would demand a finer product, he decided, before production even started, to raise the standard by ten points so that at least 85 percent of his output would pass through a 200-mesh screen. This was a bold move for someone new in the field, but his judgment, backed by his confidence in his ability to meet this standard, has been validated by his success in maintaining it, despite the skepticism from older manufacturers about achieving such a high level of fineness.
[Footnote 16: For a proper understanding and full appreciation of the importance of fine grinding, it may be explained that Portland cement (as manufactured in the Lehigh Valley) is made from what is commonly spoken of as "cement rock," with the addition of sufficient limestone to give the necessary amount of lime. The rock is broken down and then ground to a fineness of 80 to 90 per cent. through a 200-mesh screen. This ground material passes through kilns and comes out in "clinker." This is ground and that part of this finely ground clinker that will pass a 200-mesh screen is cement; the residue is still clinker. These coarse particles, or clinkers, absorb water very slowly, are practically inert, and have very feeble cementing properties. The residue on a 200-mesh screen is useless.]
[Footnote 16: To fully understand and appreciate the importance of fine grinding, it's important to explain that Portland cement (as made in the Lehigh Valley) comes from what’s commonly referred to as "cement rock," with extra limestone added to provide the necessary amount of lime. The rock is crushed and then ground to a fineness of 80 to 90 percent through a 200-mesh screen. This ground material is processed in kilns and results in "clinker." This clinker is ground further, and the part that passes through a 200-mesh screen becomes cement; the leftover is still clinker. These coarse particles, or clinkers, absorb water very slowly, are practically inactive, and have very weak cementing abilities. The residue left on a 200-mesh screen is useless.]
If Edison measured his happiness, as men often do, by merely commercial or pecuniary rewards of success, it would seem almost redundant to state that he has continued to manifest an intense interest in the cement plant. Ordinarily, his interest as an inventor wanes in proportion to the approach to mere commercialism—in other words, the keenness of his pleasure is in overcoming difficulties rather than the mere piling up of a bank account. He is entirely sensible of the advantages arising from a good balance at the banker's, but that has not been the goal of his ambition. Hence, although his cement enterprise reached the commercial stage a long time ago, he has been firmly convinced of his own ability to devise still further improvements and economical processes of greater or less fundamental importance, and has, therefore, made a constant study of the problem as a whole and in all its parts. By means of frequent reports, aided by his remarkable memory, he keeps in as close touch with the plant as if he were there in person every day, and is thus enabled to suggest improvement in any particular detail. The engineering force has a great respect for the accuracy of his knowledge of every part of the plant, for he remembers the dimensions and details of each item of machinery, sometimes to the discomfiture of those who are around it every day.
If Edison measured his happiness like most people do, by just looking at the financial benefits of success, it would almost go without saying that he still shows a strong interest in the cement plant. Generally, his passion as an inventor decreases as things get too focused on making money—in other words, what truly brings him joy is tackling challenges rather than just watching his bank account grow. He understands the benefits of having a solid bank balance, but that’s not what drives his ambition. So even though his cement business became commercially successful a long time ago, he’s always believed he could come up with further improvements and more cost-effective processes, no matter how significant. As a result, he continually studies the entire operation and all its components. Through frequent reports and his incredible memory, he stays closely connected with the plant, as if he were there every day, which allows him to suggest enhancements in specific areas. The engineering team greatly respects his detailed knowledge of every part of the plant; he remembers the measurements and specifics of each piece of machinery, sometimes frustrating those who work around it daily.
A noteworthy instance of Edison's memory occurred in connection with this cement plant. Some years ago, as its installation was nearing completion, he went up to look it over and satisfy himself as to what needed to be done. On the arrival of the train at 10.40 in the morning, he went to the mill, and, with Mr. Mason, the general superintendent, started at the crusher at one end, and examined every detail all the way through to the packing-house at the other end. He made neither notes nor memoranda, but the examination required all the day, which happened to be a Saturday. He took a train for home at 5.30 in the afternoon, and on arriving at his residence at Orange, got out some note-books and began to write entirely from memory each item consecutively. He continued at this task all through Saturday night, and worked steadily on until Sunday afternoon, when he completed a list of nearly six hundred items. The nature of this feat is more appreciable from the fact that a large number of changes included all the figures of new dimensions he had decided upon for some of the machinery throughout the plant.
A remarkable example of Edison's memory took place at this cement plant. A few years ago, as the installation was nearly finished, he went to check it out and see what still needed to be done. When the train arrived at 10:40 in the morning, he went to the mill and, along with Mr. Mason, the general superintendent, started at the crusher at one end and examined every detail all the way through to the packing house at the other end. He didn’t take any notes or write anything down, but the inspection took all day, which happened to be a Saturday. He took a train home at 5:30 in the afternoon, and when he got to his house in Orange, he pulled out some notebooks and began to write everything from memory one item after another. He worked on this task all through Saturday night and kept at it until Sunday afternoon, when he finished a list of nearly six hundred items. The significance of this achievement is even clearer considering that many of the changes included all the new dimensions he had decided on for some of the machinery throughout the plant.
As the reader may have a natural curiosity to learn whether or not the list so made was practical, it may be stated that it was copied and sent up to the general superintendent with instructions to make the modifications suggested, and report by numbers as they were attended to. This was faithfully done, all the changes being made before the plant was put into operation. Subsequent experience has amply proven the value of Edison's prescience at this time.
As the reader may be curious to know if the list created was practical, it's worth mentioning that it was copied and sent to the general superintendent with instructions to make the suggested changes and report back by number as they were completed. This was done diligently, and all the changes were made before the plant was put into operation. Later experience has clearly shown the value of Edison's foresight at that time.
Although Edison's achievements in the way of improved processes and machinery have already made a deep impression in the cement industry, it is probable that this impression will become still more profoundly stamped upon it in the near future with the exploitation of his "Poured Cement House." The broad problem which he set himself was to provide handsome and practically indestructible detached houses, which could be taken by wage-earners at very moderate monthly rentals. He turned this question over in his mind for several years, and arrived at the conclusion that a house cast in one piece would be the answer. To produce such a house involved the overcoming of many engineering and other technical difficulties. These he attacked vigorously and disposed of patiently one by one.
Although Edison's innovations in improved processes and machinery have already made a significant impact in the cement industry, it's likely that this impact will become even more pronounced in the near future with the introduction of his "Poured Cement House." His main goal was to create attractive, nearly indestructible standalone homes that wage-earners could rent for very affordable monthly rates. He thought about this issue for several years and concluded that a house made in one single piece would be the solution. Making such a house required tackling many engineering and technical challenges. He approached these challenges energetically and resolved them patiently, one by one.
In this connection a short anecdote may be quoted from Edison as indicative of one of the influences turning his thoughts in this direction. In the story of the ore-milling work, it has been noted that the plant was shut down owing to the competition of the cheap ore from the Mesaba Range. Edison says: "When I shut down, the insurance companies cancelled my insurance. I asked the reason why. 'Oh,' they said, 'this thing is a failure. The moral risk is too great.' 'All right; I am glad to hear it. I will now construct buildings that won't have any moral risk.' I determined to go into the Portland cement business. I organized a company and started cement-works which have now been running successfully for several years. I had so perfected the machinery in trying to get my ore costs down that the making of cheap cement was an easy matter to me. I built these works entirely of concrete and steel, so that there is not a wagon-load of lumber in them; and so that the insurance companies would not have any possibility of having any 'moral risk.' Since that time I have put up numerous factory buildings all of steel and concrete, without any combustible whatever about them—to avoid this 'moral risk.' I am carrying further the application of this idea in building private houses for poor people, in which there will be no 'moral risk' at all—nothing whatever to burn, not even by lightning."
In this context, a brief story from Edison can highlight one of the influences that shifted his thinking. Regarding the ore-milling work, it was mentioned that the plant was closed due to competition from the cheap ore of the Mesaba Range. Edison stated: "When I shut down, the insurance companies canceled my insurance. I asked why. 'Oh,' they said, 'this thing is a failure. The moral risk is too great.' 'Okay; I’m glad to hear that. I will now build structures that won’t have any moral risk.' I decided to enter the Portland cement business. I formed a company and started cement plants that have been operating successfully for several years. I had refined the machinery so much while trying to reduce my ore costs that producing cheap cement became easy for me. I built these plants completely out of concrete and steel, so there’s not a single wagon-load of lumber in them; and therefore, the insurance companies wouldn’t face any 'moral risk.' Since then, I have built numerous factory buildings made entirely of steel and concrete, with no flammable materials whatsoever—to eliminate this 'moral risk.' I’m extending this idea by constructing private houses for low-income families, which will have no 'moral risk' at all—nothing to burn, not even from lightning."
As a casting necessitates a mold, together with a mixture sufficiently fluid in its nature to fill all the interstices completely, Edison devoted much attention to an extensive series of experiments for producing a free-flowing combination of necessary materials. His proposition was against all precedent. All expert testimony pointed to the fact that a mixture of concrete (cement, sand, crushed stone, and water) could not be made to flow freely to the smallest parts of an intricate set of molds; that the heavy parts of the mixture could not be held in suspension, but would separate out by gravity and make an unevenly balanced structure; that the surface would be full of imperfections, etc.
As casting requires a mold along with a mix that’s fluid enough to fill every gap completely, Edison focused a lot on a series of extensive experiments to create a free-flowing combination of necessary materials. His idea went against all established norms. All expert opinions indicated that a concrete mix (cement, sand, crushed stone, and water) couldn't flow easily into the smallest sections of a complex mold; that the heavier components of the mix couldn't remain suspended but would settle due to gravity, resulting in an unbalanced structure; and that the surface would be riddled with imperfections, among other issues.
Undeterred by the unanimity of adverse opinions, however, he pursued his investigations with the thorough minuteness that characterizes all his laboratory work, and in due time produced a mixture which on elaborate test overcame all objections and answered the complex requirements perfectly, including the making of a surface smooth, even, and entirely waterproof. All the other engineering problems have received study in like manner, and have been overcome, until at the present writing the whole question is practically solved and has been reduced to actual practice. The Edison poured or cast cement house may be reckoned as a reality.
Undeterred by the unanimous negative feedback, he continued his research with the detailed precision that defines all his lab work. Eventually, he created a mixture that, after thorough testing, addressed all concerns and met the complex requirements perfectly, including producing a surface that is smooth, even, and completely waterproof. Other engineering challenges have been examined similarly and have been resolved, so that at this point, the entire issue is practically solved and is being put into practice. The Edison poured or cast cement house can now be considered a reality.
The general scheme, briefly outlined, is to prepare a model and plans of the house to be cast, and then to design a set of molds in sections of convenient size. When all is ready, these molds, which are of cast iron with smooth interior surfaces, are taken to the place where the house is to be erected. Here there has been provided a solid concrete cellar floor, technically called "footing." The molds are then locked together so that they rest on this footing. Hundreds of pieces are necessary for the complete set. When they have been completely assembled, there will be a hollow space in the interior, representing the shape of the house. Reinforcing rods are also placed in the molds, to be left behind in the finished house.
The general plan, briefly explained, is to create a model and plans for the house to be constructed, and then to design a series of molds in manageable sections. Once everything is ready, these molds, made of cast iron with smooth insides, are taken to the site where the house will be built. A solid concrete cellar floor, known as the "footing," has been prepared here. The molds are then locked together so that they rest on this footing. Hundreds of pieces are needed for the complete set. Once fully assembled, there will be a hollow space inside, shaped like the house. Reinforcing rods are also placed in the molds to remain in the finished house.
Next comes the pouring of the concrete mixture into this form. Large mechanical mixers are used, and, as it is made, the mixture is dumped into tanks, from which it is conveyed to a distributing tank on the top, or roof, of the form. From this tank a large number of open troughs or pipes lead the mixture to various openings in the roof, whence it flows down and fills all parts of the mold from the footing in the basement until it overflows at the tip of the roof.
Next comes the pouring of the concrete mix into this form. Large mechanical mixers are used, and as it's made, the mixture is dumped into tanks, from which it is transported to a distributing tank on top or on the roof of the form. From this tank, a large number of open troughs or pipes lead the mixture to various openings in the roof, where it flows down and fills all parts of the mold from the footing in the basement until it overflows at the tip of the roof.
The pouring of the entire house is accomplished in about six hours, and then the molds are left undisturbed for six days, in order that the concrete may set and harden. After that time the work of taking away the molds is begun. This requires three or four days. When the molds are taken away an entire house is disclosed, cast in one piece, from cellar to tip of roof, complete with floors, interior walls, stairways, bath and laundry tubs, electric-wire conduits, gas, water, and heating pipes. No plaster is used anywhere; but the exterior and interior walls are smooth and may be painted or tinted, if desired. All that is now necessary is to put in the windows, doors, heater, and lighting fixtures, and to connect up the plumbing and heating arrangements, thus making the house ready for occupancy.
The entire house is poured in about six hours, and then the molds are left undisturbed for six days so the concrete can set and harden. After that, the process of removing the molds starts, which takes another three or four days. Once the molds are removed, a complete house is revealed, cast in one piece from the basement to the top of the roof, with floors, interior walls, stairways, bath and laundry tubs, electric wire conduits, gas, water, and heating pipes all included. No plaster is used anywhere; both the exterior and interior walls are smooth and can be painted or tinted if desired. All that’s left to do is install the windows, doors, heater, and lighting fixtures, and connect the plumbing and heating systems, making the house ready for occupancy.
As these iron molds are not ephemeral like the wooden framing now used in cement construction, but of practically illimitable life, it is obvious that they can be used a great number of times. A complete set of molds will cost approximately $25,000, while the necessary plant will cost about $15,000 more. It is proposed to work as a unit plant for successful operation at least six sets of molds, to keep the men busy and the machinery going. Any one, with a sheet of paper, can ascertain the yearly interest on the investment as a fixed charge to be assessed against each house, on the basis that one hundred and forty-four houses can be built in a year with the battery of six sets of molds. Putting the sum at $175,000, and the interest at 6 per cent. on the cost of the molds and 4 per cent. for breakage, together with 6 per cent. interest and 15 per cent. depreciation on machinery, the plant charge is approximately $140 per house. It does not require a particularly acute prophetic vision to see "Flower Towns" of "Poured Houses" going up in whole suburbs outside all our chief centres of population.
Since these iron molds aren’t temporary like the wooden frames currently used in cement construction, but instead have an almost unlimited lifespan, it’s clear they can be reused many times. A complete set of molds will cost around $25,000, and the necessary equipment will add about $15,000 more. The plan is to operate at least six sets of molds as a unit to keep the workers busy and the machinery running. Anyone with a piece of paper can calculate the yearly interest on the investment as a fixed cost assigned to each house, based on the idea that 144 houses can be built in a year using six sets of molds. If we estimate the total at $175,000, with 6 percent interest on the cost of the molds and 4 percent for breakage, plus 6 percent interest and 15 percent depreciation on the machinery, the plant charge comes to about $140 per house. It doesn’t take a particularly sharp foresight to envision "Flower Towns" of "Poured Houses" rising in entire suburbs outside of our major population centers.
Edison's conception of the workingman's ideal house has been a broad one from the very start. He was not content merely to provide a roomy, moderately priced house that should be fireproof, waterproof, and vermin-proof, and practically indestructible, but has been solicitous to get away from the idea of a plain "packing-box" type. He has also provided for ornamentation of a high class in designing the details of the structure. As he expressed it: "We will give the workingman and his family ornamentation in their house. They deserve it, and besides, it costs no more after the pattern is made to give decorative effects than it would to make everything plain." The plans have provided for a type of house that would cost not far from $30,000 if built of cut stone. He gave to Messrs. Mann & McNaillie, architects, New York, his idea of the type of house he wanted. On receiving these plans he changed them considerably, and built a model. After making many more changes in this while in the pattern shop, he produced a house satisfactory to himself.
Edison's vision of the ideal home for working-class families has been expansive from the very beginning. He wasn't satisfied with just creating a spacious, affordable house that was fireproof, waterproof, vermin-proof, and nearly indestructible; he wanted to move away from the idea of a basic "packing-box" design. He also aimed to include high-quality ornamentation in the details of the structure. As he put it: "We will give the working man and his family decoration in their home. They deserve it, and besides, it doesn't cost any more to add decorative elements once the design is set than it does to keep everything plain." The plans were for a type of house that would cost around $30,000 if built with cut stone. He shared his vision with Messrs. Mann & McNaillie, architects in New York. After receiving their plans, he made significant changes and built a model. After making even more alterations in the pattern shop, he created a house that he was pleased with.
This one-family house has a floor plan twenty-five by thirty feet, and is three stories high. The first floor is divided off into two large rooms—parlor and living-room—and the upper floors contain four large bedrooms, a roomy bath-room, and wide halls. The front porch extends eight feet, and the back porch three feet. A cellar seven and a half feet high extends under the whole house, and will contain the boiler, wash-tubs, and coal-bunker. It is intended that the house shall be built on lots forty by sixty feet, giving a lawn and a small garden.
This single-family house has a floor plan of twenty-five by thirty feet and is three stories tall. The first floor is divided into two large rooms—a parlor and a living room—and the upper floors have four spacious bedrooms, a large bathroom, and wide hallways. The front porch extends eight feet, while the back porch is three feet deep. A cellar that's seven and a half feet high runs beneath the entire house and will house the boiler, wash tubs, and coal bunker. The house is planned to be built on lots that are forty by sixty feet, allowing for a lawn and a small garden.
It is contemplated that these houses shall be built in industrial communities, where they can be put up in groups of several hundred. If erected in this manner, and by an operator buying his materials in large quantities, Edison believes that these houses can be erected complete, including heating apparatus and plumbing, for $1200 each. This figure would also rest on the basis of using in the mixture the gravel excavated on the site. Comment has been made by persons of artistic taste on the monotony of a cluster of houses exactly alike in appearance, but this criticism has been anticipated, and the molds are so made as to be capable of permutations of arrangement. Thus it will be possible to introduce almost endless changes in the style of house by variation of the same set of molds.
It is expected that these homes will be built in industrial communities, where they can be constructed in groups of several hundred. If built this way, and with an operator purchasing materials in bulk, Edison believes these homes can be completed, including heating and plumbing, for $1200 each. This price also assumes using gravel from the excavation on the site. Some people with an eye for design have commented on the sameness of a cluster of identical houses, but this feedback has been anticipated, and the molds are designed to allow for variations in arrangement. Therefore, it will be possible to create nearly endless changes in the style of homes by altering the same set of molds.
For more than forty years Edison was avowedly an inventor for purely commercial purposes; but within the last two years he decided to retire from that field so far as new inventions were concerned, and to devote himself to scientific research and experiment in the leisure hours that might remain after continuing to improve his existing devices. But although the poured cement house was planned during the commercial period, the spirit in which it was conceived arose out of an earnest desire to place within the reach of the wage-earner an opportunity to better his physical, pecuniary, and mental conditions in so far as that could be done through the medium of hygienic and beautiful homes at moderate rentals. From the first Edison has declared that it was not his intention to benefit pecuniarily through the exploitation of this project. Having actually demonstrated the practicability and feasibility of his plans, he will allow responsible concerns to carry them into practice under such limitations as may be necessary to sustain the basic object, but without any payment to him except for the actual expense incurred. The hypercritical may cavil and say that, as a manufacturer of cement, Edison will be benefited. True, but as ANY good Portland cement can be used, and no restrictions as to source of supply are enforced, he, or rather his company, will be merely one of many possible purveyors.
For over forty years, Edison was openly an inventor focused on making money; however, in the last two years, he decided to step back from creating new inventions and dedicate his time to scientific research and experimentation during the free hours he had left after improving his current devices. Even though the poured cement house was designed during his commercial phase, the idea behind it came from a genuine wish to provide wage-earners with the chance to enhance their physical, financial, and mental well-being through hygienic and beautiful homes at reasonable rents. From the beginning, Edison stated that he didn’t intend to profit financially from this project. After proving that his plans were practical and doable, he will let responsible companies implement them with necessary guidelines to maintain the primary goal, but without any payment to him except for the actual costs incurred. Critics might argue that since Edison manufactures cement, he will benefit. That’s true, but because any good Portland cement can be used and there are no restrictions on the source of supply, he, or rather his company, will simply be one of many potential suppliers.
This invention is practically a gift to the workingmen of the world and their families. The net result will be that those who care to avail themselves of the privilege may, sooner or later, forsake the crowded apartment or tenement and be comfortably housed in sanitary, substantial, and roomy homes fitted with modern conveniences, and beautified by artistic decorations, with no outlay for insurance or repairs; no dread of fire, and all at a rental which Edison believes will be not more, but probably less than, $10 per month in any city of the United States. While his achievement in its present status will bring about substantial and immediate benefits to wage-earners, his thoughts have already travelled some years ahead in the formulation of a still further beneficial project looking toward the individual ownership of these houses on a basis startling in its practical possibilities.
This invention is basically a gift to workers and their families around the world. The end result will be that those who want to take advantage of it can, eventually, leave behind crowded apartments or tenements and live comfortably in clean, solid, and spacious homes equipped with modern amenities, adorned with beautiful decorations, with no costs for insurance or repairs; no fear of fire, all for a rent that Edison believes will not exceed, and likely be less than, $10 per month in any city in the United States. While his current achievement will provide significant and immediate benefits to wage earners, he is already thinking several years ahead, planning an even more beneficial project aimed at individual ownership of these homes with practical possibilities that are quite impressive.
CHAPTER XXI
MOTION PICTURES
THE preceding chapters have treated of Edison in various aspects as an inventor, some of which are familiar to the public, others of which are believed to be in the nature of a novel revelation, simply because no one had taken the trouble before to put the facts together. To those who have perhaps grown weary of seeing Edison's name in articles of a sensational character, it may sound strange to say that, after all, justice has not been done to his versatile and many-sided nature; and that the mere prosaic facts of his actual achievement outrun the wildest flights of irrelevant journalistic imagination. Edison hates nothing more than to be dubbed a genius or played up as a "wizard"; but this fate has dogged him until he has come at last to resign himself to it with a resentful indignation only to be appreciated when watching him read the latest full-page Sunday "spread" that develops a casual conversation into oracular verbosity, and gives to his shrewd surmise the cast of inspired prophecy.
The previous chapters have explored different aspects of Edison as an inventor. Some of these are well-known to the public, while others are considered novel revelations simply because no one had bothered to piece the facts together before. For those who may be tired of seeing Edison's name in sensational articles, it might sound odd to say that, in reality, his versatile and multifaceted nature hasn’t been fairly represented; the straightforward facts of his achievements surpass even the most far-fetched stories spun by journalists. Edison dislikes nothing more than being called a genius or portrayed as a "wizard," but this has followed him to the point where he has reluctantly accepted it, feeling a resentful indignation that can be seen when he reads the latest full-page Sunday feature that turns a simple conversation into grandiose language and transforms his astute observations into predictions of brilliance.
In other words, Edison's real work has seldom been seriously discussed. Rather has it been taken as a point of departure into a realm of fancy and romance, where as a relief from drudgery he is sometimes quite willing to play the pipe if some one will dance to it. Indeed, the stories woven around his casual suggestions are tame and vapid alongside his own essays in fiction, probably never to be published, but which show what a real inventor can do when he cuts loose to create a new heaven and a new earth, unrestrained by any formal respect for existing conditions of servitude to three dimensions and the standard elements.
In other words, Edison's actual work hasn’t been taken seriously very often. Instead, it’s been seen as a starting point for a mix of imagination and storytelling, where he sometimes gladly plays the flute if someone will dance along. In fact, the tales spun around his offhand ideas are boring and uninspired compared to his own fiction, which likely will never see the light of day, but reveals what a true inventor can accomplish when he’s free to create a whole new world, unrestricted by any conventional notion of limitations or traditional materials.
The present chapter, essentially technical in its subject-matter, is perhaps as significant as any in this biography, because it presents Edison as the Master Impresario of his age, and maybe of many following ages also. His phonographs and his motion pictures have more audiences in a week than all the theatres in America in a year. The "Nickelodeon" is the central fact in modern amusement, and Edison founded it. All that millions know of music and drama he furnishes; and the whole study of the theatrical managers thus reaching the masses is not to ascertain the limitations of the new art, but to discover its boundless possibilities. None of the exuberant versions of things Edison has not done could endure for a moment with the simple narrative of what he has really done as the world's new Purveyor of Pleasure. And yet it all depends on the toilful conquest of a subtle and intricate art. The story of the invention of the phonograph has been told. That of the evolution of motion pictures follows. It is all one piece of sober, careful analysis, and stubborn, successful attack on the problem.
The current chapter, mainly technical in its focus, is probably as important as any in this biography, because it portrays Edison as the Master Showman of his time, and perhaps of many times to come. His phonographs and motion pictures reach more audiences in a week than all the theaters in America do in a year. The "Nickelodeon" is the key element of modern entertainment, and Edison is its founder. Everything millions know about music and drama comes from him; and the entire approach of theatrical managers to reach the masses is not about figuring out the limits of this new art but about discovering its endless possibilities. None of the exaggerated claims about what Edison hasn't done could last a moment against the straightforward account of what he has actually achieved as the world's new Provider of Enjoyment. Yet, it's all based on the hard-earned mastery of a subtle and complex art. The story of the phonograph's invention has been shared. The development of motion pictures comes next. It's all part of a careful, detailed analysis and a determined, successful tackle of the challenge.
The possibility of making a record of animate movement, and subsequently reproducing it, was predicted long before the actual accomplishment. This, as we have seen, was also the case with the phonograph, the telephone, and the electric light. As to the phonograph, the prediction went only so far as the RESULT; the apparent intricacy of the problem being so great that the MEANS for accomplishing the desired end were seemingly beyond the grasp of the imagination or the mastery of invention.
The ability to capture living movement and then recreate it was envisioned long before it actually happened. This was also true for the phonograph, the telephone, and the electric light. In the case of the phonograph, predictions only went as far as the OUTCOME; the complexity of the issue seemed so vast that the METHODS to achieve the desired result felt out of reach for both the imagination and innovation.
With the electric light and the telephone the prediction included not only the result to be accomplished, but, in a rough and general way, the mechanism itself; that is to say, long before a single sound was intelligibly transmitted it was recognized that such a thing might be done by causing a diaphragm, vibrated by original sounds, to communicate its movements to a distant diaphragm by a suitably controlled electric current. In the case of the electric light, the heating of a conductor to incandescence in a highly rarefied atmosphere was suggested as a scheme of illumination long before its actual accomplishment, and in fact before the production of a suitable generator for delivering electric current in a satisfactory and economical manner.
With the electric light and the telephone, the prediction included not only the outcome to be achieved but also, in a general way, the mechanism itself; that is to say, long before any sound was clearly transmitted, it was recognized that this could be done by making a diaphragm vibrate due to original sounds and conveying its movements to a distant diaphragm through a properly controlled electric current. For the electric light, the idea of heating a conductor to create light in a highly rarefied atmosphere was proposed as a way to produce illumination long before it was actually realized, and even before a suitable generator to supply electric current efficiently and economically was developed.
It is a curious fact that while the modern art of motion pictures depends essentially on the development of instantaneous photography, the suggestion of the possibility of securing a reproduction of animate motion, as well as, in a general way, of the mechanism for accomplishing the result, was made many years before the instantaneous photograph became possible. While the first motion picture was not actually produced until the summer of 1889, its real birth was almost a century earlier, when Plateau, in France, constructed an optical toy, to which the impressive name of "Phenakistoscope" was applied, for producing an illusion of motion. This toy in turn was the forerunner of the Zoetrope, or so-called "Wheel of Life," which was introduced into this country about the year 1845. These devices were essentially toys, depending for their successful operation (as is the case with motion pictures) upon a physiological phenomenon known as persistence of vision. If, for instance, a bright light is moved rapidly in front of the eye in a dark room, it appears not as an illuminated spark, but as a line of fire; a so-called shooting star, or a flash of lightning produces the same effect. This result is purely physiological, and is due to the fact that the retina of the eye may be considered as practically a sensitized plate of relatively slow speed, and an image impressed upon it remains, before being effaced, for a period of from one-tenth to one-seventh of a second, varying according to the idiosyncrasies of the individual and the intensity of the light. When, therefore, it is said that we should only believe things we actually see, we ought to remember that in almost every instance we never see things as they are.
It’s interesting that while modern filmmaking relies heavily on the evolution of instant photography, the idea of capturing moving images was suggested many years before instant photography became feasible. Although the first motion picture wasn’t produced until the summer of 1889, its true origin dates back nearly a century earlier when Plateau, in France, created an optical toy called the "Phenakistoscope" to create the illusion of motion. This toy was a precursor to the Zoetrope, or the "Wheel of Life," which was brought to the U.S. around 1845. These devices were mainly toys that relied on a physiological phenomenon known as persistence of vision, just like motion pictures do. For example, if a bright light is quickly moved in front of the eye in a dark room, it appears as a continuous line rather than a single spark; a shooting star or a flash of lightning creates a similar effect. This result is purely physiological because the retina of the eye acts like a slow-sensitive plate where an image remains for about one-tenth to one-seventh of a second before fading, depending on the individual and the brightness of the light. So, when we say we should only believe what we actually see, we must remember that in most cases, we never see things exactly as they are.
Bearing in mind the fact that when an image is impressed on the human retina it persists for an appreciable period, varying as stated, with the individual, and depending also upon the intensity of the illumination, it will be seen that, if a number of pictures or photographs are successively presented to the eye, they will appear as a single, continuous photograph, provided the periods between them are short enough to prevent one of the photographs from being effaced before its successor is presented. If, for instance, a series of identical portraits were rapidly presented to the eye, a single picture would apparently be viewed, or if we presented to the eye the series of photographs of a moving object, each one representing a minute successive phase of the movement, the movements themselves would apparently again take place.
Considering that when an image is projected onto the human retina, it remains for a significant amount of time, varying from person to person and depending on the brightness of the light, it's clear that if several pictures or photos are shown to the eye in quick succession, they will merge into one continuous image, as long as the gaps between them are short enough to prevent the previous photo from fading before the next one appears. For example, if a series of identical portraits were quickly shown to the eye, it would seem like one single image. Similarly, if we displayed a sequence of photos of a moving object, each capturing a tiny moment of the movement, it would look like the movement itself is happening again.
With the Zoetrope and similar toys rough drawings were used for depicting a few broadly outlined successive phases of movement, because in their day instantaneous photography was unknown, and in addition there were certain crudities of construction that seriously interfered with the illumination of the pictures, rendering it necessary to make them practically as silhouettes on a very conspicuous background. Hence it will be obvious that these toys produced merely an ILLUSION of THEORETICAL motion.
With the Zoetrope and similar toys, simple sketches were used to show a few broadly outlined steps in movement, since instant photography hadn't been invented yet. Additionally, the construction flaws really affected the lighting of the images, making it necessary to create them essentially as silhouettes against a very noticeable background. So, it’s clear that these toys only created an illusion of theoretical motion.
But with the knowledge of even an illusion of motion, and with the philosophy of persistence of vision fully understood, it would seem that, upon the development of instantaneous photography, the reproduction of ACTUAL motion by means of pictures would have followed, almost as a necessary consequence. Yet such was not the case, and success was ultimately accomplished by Edison only after persistent experimenting along lines that could not have been predicted, including the construction of apparatus for the purpose, which, if it had not been made, would undoubtedly be considered impossible. In fact, if it were not for Edison's peculiar mentality, that refuses to recognize anything as impossible until indubitably demonstrated to be so, the production of motion pictures would certainly have been delayed for years, if not for all time.
But with the understanding of even a fake sense of motion, and with the concept of persistence of vision clearly recognized, it would seem that, after the advent of instant photography, capturing REAL motion through pictures would have naturally followed. Yet that wasn't the case, and Edison only achieved success after persistent experimentation along unpredictable paths, including the creation of equipment specifically for this purpose, which, if it hadn't been built, would surely have been seen as impossible. In fact, if it weren't for Edison's unique mindset, which doesn't accept anything as impossible until it is clearly proven to be so, the creation of motion pictures would have definitely been delayed for years, if not indefinitely.
One of the earliest suggestions of the possibility of utilizing photography for exhibiting the illusion of actual movement was made by Ducos, who, as early as 1864, obtained a patent in France, in which he said: "My invention consists in substituting rapidly and without confusion to the eye not only of an individual, but when so desired of a whole assemblage, the enlarged images of a great number of pictures when taken instantaneously and successively at very short intervals.... The observer will believe that he sees only one image, which changes gradually by reason of the successive changes of form and position of the objects which occur from one picture to the other. Even supposing that there be a slight interval of time during which the same object was not shown, the persistence of the luminous impression upon the eye will fill this gap. There will be as it were a living representation of nature and . . . the same scene will be reproduced upon the screen with the same degree of animation.... By means of my apparatus I am enabled especially to reproduce the passing of a procession, a review of military manoeuvres, the movements of a battle, a public fete, a theatrical scene, the evolution or the dances of one or of several persons, the changing expression of countenance, or, if one desires, the grimaces of a human face; a marine view, the motion of waves, the passage of clouds in a stormy sky, particularly in a mountainous country, the eruption of a volcano," etc.
One of the earliest ideas about using photography to create the illusion of real movement came from Ducos, who, as early as 1864, received a patent in France. He explained: "My invention involves quickly and clearly displaying to the eye—not just for an individual, but for an entire group—the enlarged images of many pictures taken instantly and in quick succession... The viewer will feel like they see only one image that gradually changes due to the different forms and positions of the objects from one picture to the next. Even if there’s a brief moment when the same object isn’t visible, the lingering impression on the eye will fill that gap. It will be like a living representation of nature, and... the same scene will appear on the screen with the same level of liveliness... With my device, I can especially reproduce the passing of a parade, a military review, the movements of a battle, a public festival, a theatrical scene, the evolution or dances of one or more people, changing facial expressions, or even the grimaces of a human face; a seascape, the motion of waves, the movement of clouds in a stormy sky, particularly in mountainous areas, the eruption of a volcano," etc.
Other dreamers, contemporaries of Ducos, made similar suggestions; they recognized the scientific possibility of the problem, but they were irretrievably handicapped by the shortcomings of photography. Even when substantially instantaneous photographs were evolved at a somewhat later date they were limited to the use of wet plates, which have to be prepared by the photographer and used immediately, and were therefore quite out of the question for any practical commercial scheme. Besides this, the use of plates would have been impracticable, because the limitations of their weight and size would have prevented the taking of a large number of pictures at a high rate of speed, even if the sensitized surface had been sufficiently rapid.
Other dreamers, contemporaries of Ducos, made similar suggestions; they recognized the scientific possibility of the problem, but they were severely limited by the shortcomings of photography. Even when nearly instantaneous photographs were developed a bit later, they were restricted to wet plates, which had to be prepared by the photographer and used immediately, making them completely impractical for any commercial venture. Moreover, the use of plates was unworkable, as their weight and size limitations would have made it impossible to take a large number of photos quickly, even if the sensitized surface had been fast enough.
Nothing ever came of Ducos' suggestions and those of the early dreamers in this essentially practical and commercial art, and their ideas have made no greater impress upon the final result than Jules Verne's Nautilus of our boyhood days has developed the modern submarine. From time to time further suggestions were made, some in patents, and others in photographic and scientific publications, all dealing with the fascinating thought of preserving and representing actual scenes and events. The first serious attempt to secure an illusion of motion by photography was made in 1878 by Edward Muybridge as a result of a wager with the late Senator Leland Stanford, the California pioneer and horse-lover, who had asserted, contrary to the usual belief, that a trotting-horse at one point in its gait left the ground entirely. At this time wet plates of very great rapidity were known, and by arranging a series of cameras along the line of a track and causing the horse in trotting past them, by striking wires or strings attached to the shutters, to actuate the cameras at the right instant, a series of very clear instantaneous photographs was obtained. From these negatives, when developed, positive prints were made, which were later mounted on a modified form of Zoetrope and projected upon a screen.
Nothing ever came of Ducos' suggestions and those from the early visionaries in this practical and commercial art, and their ideas have influenced the final outcome no more than Jules Verne's Nautilus from our childhood shaped the modern submarine. Every so often, more suggestions were made, some through patents and others in photography and scientific publications, all focused on the intriguing idea of capturing and showcasing real scenes and events. The first serious attempt to create the illusion of motion through photography was made in 1878 by Edward Muybridge, stemming from a bet with the late Senator Leland Stanford, a California pioneer and horse enthusiast, who claimed, against general belief, that a trotting horse at one point in its stride completely leaves the ground. At this time, very fast wet plates were known, and by setting up a series of cameras along a track and having the horse trot past them—triggering the cameras at the right moment by pulling wires or strings connected to the shutters—a series of clear instantaneous photographs was captured. From these negatives, once developed, positive prints were made, which were later displayed on a modified version of a Zoetrope and projected onto a screen.
One of these early exhibitions is described in the Scientific American of June 5, 1880: "While the separate photographs had shown the successive positions of a trotting or running horse in making a single stride, the Zoogyroscope threw upon the screen apparently the living animal. Nothing was wanting but the clatter of hoofs upon the turf, and an occasional breath of steam from the nostrils, to make the spectator believe that he had before him genuine flesh-and-blood steeds. In the views of hurdle-leaping, the simulation was still more admirable, even to the motion of the tail as the animal gathered for the jump, the raising of his head, all were there. Views of an ox trotting, a wild bull on the charge, greyhounds and deer running and birds flying in mid-air were shown, also athletes in various positions." It must not be assumed from this statement that even as late as the work of Muybridge anything like a true illusion of movement had been obtained, because such was not the case. Muybridge secured only one cycle of movement, because a separate camera had to be used for each photograph and consequently each cycle was reproduced over and over again. To have made photographs of a trotting-horse for one minute at the moderate rate of twelve per second would have required, under the Muybridge scheme, seven hundred and twenty separate cameras, whereas with the modern art only a single camera is used. A further defect with the Muybridge pictures was that since each photograph was secured when the moving object was in the centre of the plate, the reproduction showed the object always centrally on the screen with its arms or legs in violent movement, but not making any progress, and with the scenery rushing wildly across the field of view!
One of these early exhibitions is described in the Scientific American from June 5, 1880: "While the individual photographs had captured the different positions of a trotting or running horse during a single stride, the Zoogyroscope projected what seemed like the actual living animal onto the screen. All that was missing was the sound of hooves on the grass and a puff of steam from its nostrils to convince the audience that they were seeing real flesh-and-blood horses. In the scenes of hurdle jumping, the imitation was even more impressive, including the movement of the tail as the horse prepared to jump, the lifting of its head—everything was there. They also showed an ox trotting, a wild bull charging, greyhounds and deer running, and birds flying in mid-air, along with athletes in various poses." It shouldn’t be assumed from this that even with Muybridge's work, a true illusion of movement had been achieved, because that wasn't the case. Muybridge was only able to capture one cycle of movement, since a separate camera had to be used for each photo, and thus each cycle was repeated over and over. To capture a trotting horse for one minute at the moderate rate of twelve frames per second would have needed, under Muybridge's method, seven hundred and twenty separate cameras, while modern techniques only require a single camera. Another flaw with Muybridge's images was that since each photograph was taken when the moving object was at the center of the frame, the reproduction always showed the object centrally on the screen with its limbs in frantic motion but not advancing, while the background raced past in a blur!
In the early 80's the dry plate was first introduced into general use, and from that time onward its rapidity and quality were gradually improved; so much so that after 1882 Prof. E. J. Marey, of the French Academy, who in 1874 had published a well-known treatise on "Animal Movement," was able by the use of dry plates to carry forward the experiments of Muybridge on a greatly refined scale. Marey was, however, handicapped by reason of the fact that glass plates were still used, although he was able with a single camera to obtain twelve photographs on successive plates in the space of one second. Marey, like Muybridge, photographed only one cycle of the movements of a single object, which was subsequently reproduced over and over again, and the camera was in the form of a gun, which could follow the object so that the successive pictures would be always located in the centre of the plates.
In the early 1980s, dry plates were first introduced for general use, and from that point on, their speed and quality improved rapidly. So much so that after 1882, Professor E. J. Marey of the French Academy, who published a well-known study on "Animal Movement" in 1874, was able to advance Muybridge's experiments on a much more refined scale using dry plates. However, Marey faced challenges because glass plates were still in use, even though he managed to take twelve photographs on consecutive plates in just one second with a single camera. Like Muybridge, Marey captured only one cycle of a single object's movements, which were then reproduced multiple times. His camera resembled a gun, allowing it to track the object and ensure the successive images were always centered on the plates.
The review above given, as briefly as possible, comprises substantially the sum of the world's knowledge at the time the problem of recording and reproducing animate movement was first undertaken by Edison. The most that could be said of the condition of the art when Edison entered the field was that it had been recognized that if a series of instantaneous photographs of a moving object could be secured at an enormously high rate many times per second—they might be passed before the eye either directly or by projection upon a screen, and thereby result in a reproduction of the movements. Two very serious difficulties lay in the way of actual accomplishment, however—first, the production of a sensitive surface in such form and weight as to be capable of being successively brought into position and exposed, at the necessarily high rate; and, second, the production of a camera capable of so taking the pictures. There were numerous other workers in the field, but they added nothing to what had already been proposed. Edison himself knew nothing of Ducos, or that the suggestions had advanced beyond the single centrally located photographs of Muybridge and Marey. As a matter of public policy, the law presumes that an inventor must be familiar with all that has gone before in the field within which he is working, and if a suggestion is limited to a patent granted in New South Wales, or is described in a single publication in Brazil, an inventor in America, engaged in the same field of thought, is by legal fiction presumed to have knowledge not only of the existence of that patent or publication, but of its contents. We say this not in the way of an apology for the extent of Edison's contribution to the motion-picture art, because there can be no question that he was as much the creator of that art as he was of the phonographic art; but to show that in a practical sense the suggestion of the art itself was original with him. He himself says: "In the year 1887 the idea occurred to me that it was possible to devise an instrument which should do for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear, and that by a combination of the two, all motion and sound could be recorded and reproduced simultaneously. This idea, the germ of which came from the little toy called the Zoetrope and the work of Muybridge, Marey, and others, has now been accomplished, so that every change of facial expression can be recorded and reproduced life-size. The kinetoscope is only a small model illustrating the present stage of the progress, but with each succeeding month new possibilities are brought into view. I believe that in coming years, by my own work and that of Dickson, Muybridge, Marey, and others who will doubtless enter the field, grand opera can be given at the Metropolitan Opera House at New York without any material change from the original, and with artists and musicians long since dead."
The above review summarizes the world's knowledge at the time Edison first tackled the issue of recording and reproducing live motion. When Edison got involved, the main understanding was that if a series of quick photographs of a moving object could be taken at an extremely high rate—many times per second—they could be shown to the eye, either directly or projected onto a screen, resulting in a reproduction of that movement. However, two major challenges stood in the way of achieving this: first, creating a sensitive surface that was light enough to be positioned and exposed at the required fast rate; and second, developing a camera that could capture the images. While there were many others working in this field, they didn't contribute anything new beyond what had already been suggested. Edison was unaware of Ducos or that the ideas had progressed beyond the single photographs of Muybridge and Marey. By law, it is assumed that an inventor is familiar with everything that has come before in their field. So if there's a patent granted in New South Wales or a publication in Brazil, an inventor in America working on similar concepts is legally assumed to know not just about that patent or publication but also its details. We mention this not to downplay Edison's significant contribution to motion pictures—there's no doubt he was a key creator in that art, just as he was with phonographs—but to highlight that the core idea of the art itself was original to him. He noted: "In 1887, I thought it was possible to create an instrument that would do for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear, and that by combining the two, we could record and reproduce all motion and sound at the same time. This idea, inspired by the toy called the Zoetrope and the work of Muybridge, Marey, and others, has now come to fruition, allowing every change in facial expression to be recorded and reproduced life-size. The kinetoscope is just a small model showcasing the current progress, but with each passing month, new possibilities emerge. I believe that in the future, through my work and that of Dickson, Muybridge, Marey, and others who will surely join the field, grand opera can be presented at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York without any significant alteration from the original, featuring artists and musicians who have long since passed."
In the earliest experiments attempts were made to secure the photographs, reduced microscopically, arranged spirally on a cylinder about the size of a phonograph record, and coated with a highly sensitized surface, the cylinder being given an intermittent movement, so as to be at rest during each exposure. Reproductions were obtained in the same way, positive prints being observed through a magnifying glass. Various forms of apparatus following this general type were made, but they were all open to the serious objection that the very rapid emulsions employed were relatively coarse-grained and prevented the securing of sharp pictures of microscopic size. On the other hand, the enlarging of the apparatus to permit larger pictures to be obtained would present too much weight to be stopped and started with the requisite rapidity. In these early experiments, however, it was recognized that, to secure proper results, a single camera should be used, so that the objects might move across its field just as they move across the field of the human eye; and the important fact was also observed that the rate at which persistence of vision took place represented the minimum speed at which the pictures should be obtained. If, for instance, five pictures per second were taken (half of the time being occupied in exposure and the other half in moving the exposed portion of the film out of the field of the lens and bringing a new portion into its place), and the same ratio is observed in exhibiting the pictures, the interval of time between successive pictures would be one-tenth of a second; and for a normal eye such an exhibition would present a substantially continuous photograph. If the angular movement of the object across the field is very slow, as, for instance, a distant vessel, the successive positions of the object are so nearly coincident that when reproduced before the eye an impression of smooth, continuous movement is secured. If, however, the object is moving rapidly across the field of view, one picture will be separated from its successor to a marked extent, and the resulting impression will be jerky and unnatural. Recognizing this fact, Edison always sought for a very high speed, so as to give smooth and natural reproductions, and even with his experimental apparatus obtained upward of forty-eight pictures per second, whereas, in practice, at the present time, the accepted rate varies between twenty and thirty per second. In the efforts of the present day to economize space by using a minimum length of film, pictures are frequently taken at too slow a rate, and the reproductions are therefore often objectionable, by reason of more or less jerkiness.
In the earliest experiments, attempts were made to capture photographs that were reduced in size, arranged spirally on a cylinder about the size of a vinyl record, and coated with a highly sensitive surface. The cylinder was designed to move intermittently, so it would be still during each exposure. Reproductions were made in the same way, with positive prints viewed through a magnifying glass. Various types of equipment based on this general idea were created, but they all had the major drawback that the very fast emulsions used were relatively coarse-grained, which made it hard to achieve sharp pictures at a microscopic level. On the flip side, enlarging the equipment to allow for larger pictures would make it too heavy to start and stop quickly. However, in these early experiments, it was understood that to get accurate results, a single camera should be used, allowing objects to move across its field just like they do across the human eye's field of vision. It was also noted that the speed at which persistence of vision occurs represented the minimum rate at which pictures should be taken. For example, if five pictures were captured per second (with half the time used for exposure and the other half for moving the exposed part of the film out of the lens field and bringing a new section into place), and the same ratio maintained while showing the pictures, the time between successive images would be one-tenth of a second. For a normal eye, such a presentation would look like a continuous photograph. If the object’s angular movement across the field is very slow, like a distant ship, the successive positions of the object are so close that when shown to the eye, it creates an impression of smooth, continuous movement. However, if the object moves quickly across the field of view, the separation between images would be significant, resulting in a jerky and unnatural impression. Acknowledging this, Edison always aimed for very high speeds to achieve smooth and natural reproductions, and even with his experimental equipment, he managed to capture over forty-eight pictures per second. In practice today, the accepted rate usually ranges between twenty and thirty per second. Currently, in efforts to save space by using the shortest film possible, pictures are often taken at too slow a rate, leading to reproductions that can appear jerky.
During the experimental period and up to the early part of 1889, the kodak film was being slowly developed by the Eastman Kodak Company. Edison perceived in this product the solution of the problem on which he had been working, because the film presented a very light body of tough material on which relatively large photographs could be taken at rapid intervals. The surface, however, was not at first sufficiently sensitive to admit of sharply defined pictures being secured at the necessarily high rates. It seemed apparent, therefore, that in order to obtain the desired speed there would have to be sacrificed that fineness of emulsion necessary for the securing of sharp pictures. But as was subsequently seen, this sacrifice was in time rendered unnecessary. Much credit is due the Eastman experts—stimulated and encouraged by Edison, but independently of him—for the production at last of a highly sensitized, fine-grained emulsion presenting the highly sensitized surface that Edison sought.
During the experimental period and into early 1889, the Eastman Kodak Company was gradually developing kodak film. Edison saw this product as the answer to the problem he had been tackling, because the film was made of a lightweight, tough material that allowed for relatively large photographs to be taken quickly. However, at first, the surface wasn’t sensitive enough to produce sharply defined pictures at the necessary high speeds. It seemed clear that to achieve the desired speed, the emulsion's quality, which was crucial for sharp images, would have to be compromised. But as later developments showed, this compromise eventually became unnecessary. A lot of credit goes to the Eastman experts—who were motivated and inspired by Edison but worked independently—for finally creating a highly sensitized, fine-grained emulsion with the sensitive surface Edison was looking for.
Having at last obtained apparently the proper material upon which to secure the photographs, the problem then remained to devise an apparatus by means of which from twenty to forty pictures per second could be taken; the film being stationary during the exposure and, upon the closing of the shutter, being moved to present a fresh surface. In connection with this problem it is interesting to note that this question of high speed was apparently regarded by all Edison's predecessors as the crucial point. Ducos, for example, expended a great deal of useless ingenuity in devising a camera by means of which a tape-line film could receive the photographs while being in continuous movement, necessitating the use of a series of moving lenses. Another experimenter, Dumont, made use of a single large plate and a great number of lenses which were successively exposed. Muybridge, as we have seen, used a series of cameras, one for each plate. Marey was limited to a very few photographs, because the entire surface had to be stopped and started in connection with each exposure.
Finally having the right materials to secure the photographs, the next challenge was to create a device that could capture twenty to forty images per second. The film needed to stay still during the exposure and then shift to show a fresh surface after the shutter closed. Interestingly, this high-speed issue was seen as the main challenge by all of Edison's predecessors. Ducos, for instance, wasted a lot of effort trying to design a camera that would take pictures on a moving strip of film, requiring a set of moving lenses. Another experimenter, Dumont, used one large plate with many lenses that were exposed one after another. Muybridge, as we saw, used a series of cameras, each for a different plate. Marey could only capture a limited number of photos because the entire surface had to stop and start for each exposure.
After the accomplishment of the fact, it would seem to be the obvious thing to use a single lens and move the sensitized film with respect to it, intermittently bringing the surface to rest, then exposing it, then cutting off the light and moving the surface to a fresh position; but who, other than Edison, would assume that such a device could be made to repeat these movements over and over again at the rate of twenty to forty per second? Users of kodaks and other forms of film cameras will appreciate perhaps better than others the difficulties of the problem, because in their work, after an exposure, they have to advance the film forward painfully to the extent of the next picture before another exposure can take place, these operations permitting of speeds of but a few pictures per minute at best. Edison's solution of the problem involved the production of a kodak in which from twenty to forty pictures should be taken IN EACH SECOND, and with such fineness of adjustment that each should exactly coincide with its predecessors even when subjected to the test of enlargement by projection. This, however, was finally accomplished, and in the summer of 1889 the first modern motion-picture camera was made. More than this, the mechanism for operating the film was so constructed that the movement of the film took place in one-tenth of the time required for the exposure, giving the film an opportunity to come to rest prior to the opening of the shutter. From that day to this the Edison camera has been the accepted standard for securing pictures of objects in motion, and such changes as have been made in it have been purely in the nature of detail mechanical refinements.
After achieving the goal, it seemed obvious to use a single lens and move the exposed film accordingly, pausing to let the surface rest, then exposing it, cutting off the light, and shifting the surface to a new position. But who, apart from Edison, would think such a device could repeat these movements continuously at a speed of twenty to forty times per second? Users of Kodaks and other types of film cameras likely understand the challenges better than anyone, as they have to manually advance the film after each exposure to the next frame before taking another shot, which limits them to only a few pictures per minute at best. Edison's solution was to create a Kodak that could capture twenty to forty pictures every second, with such precision that each frame matched perfectly with the previous ones, even when enlarged for projection. This was eventually achieved, and in the summer of 1889, the first modern motion-picture camera was built. Moreover, the film movement mechanism was designed so that the film moved in one-tenth of the time it took to expose, giving the film time to settle before the shutter opened. Since then, Edison's camera has been the standard for capturing moving images, and any modifications made have been mere mechanical refinements.
The earliest form of exhibiting apparatus, known as the Kinetoscope, was a machine in which a positive print from the negative obtained in the camera was exhibited directly to the eye through a peep-hole; but in 1895 the films were applied to modified forms of magic lanterns, by which the images are projected upon a screen. Since that date the industry has developed very rapidly, and at the present time (1910) all of the principal American manufacturers of motion pictures are paying a royalty to Edison under his basic patents.
The earliest type of display device, called the Kinetoscope, was a machine that showed a positive print from the negative captured by the camera directly to the viewer through a small hole; however, in 1895, the films were adapted for modified versions of magic lanterns, allowing the images to be projected onto a screen. Since then, the industry has grown quickly, and as of now (1910), all the major American motion picture manufacturers are paying royalty fees to Edison under his foundational patents.
From the early days of pictures representing simple movements, such as a man sneezing, or a skirt-dance, there has been a gradual evolution, until now the pictures represent not only actual events in all their palpitating instantaneity, but highly developed dramas and scenarios enacted in large, well-equipped glass studios, and the result of infinite pains and expense of production. These pictures are exhibited in upward of eight thousand places of amusement in the United States, and are witnessed by millions of people each year. They constitute a cheap, clean form of amusement for many persons who cannot spare the money to go to the ordinary theatres, or they may be exhibited in towns that are too small to support a theatre. More than this, they offer to the poor man an effective substitute for the saloon. Probably no invention ever made has afforded more pleasure and entertainment than the motion picture.
From the early days of simple moving images, like a man sneezing or a dance, there has been a gradual evolution. Now, these images depict not only real events in all their vivid excitement but also complex dramas and stories performed in large, well-equipped studios, resulting from countless hours of hard work and significant production costs. These films are shown in over eight thousand entertainment venues across the United States and are enjoyed by millions of people every year. They provide an affordable and clean form of entertainment for those who can't afford regular theater tickets, or they can be screened in towns too small to have a theater. Furthermore, they offer a meaningful alternative to the bar for many. No invention has likely brought more joy and entertainment than the motion picture.
Aside from the development of the motion picture as a spectacle, there has gone on an evolution in its use for educational purposes of wide range, which must not be overlooked. In fact, this form of utilization has been carried further in Europe than in this country as a means of demonstration in the arts and sciences. One may study animal life, watch a surgical operation, follow the movement of machinery, take lessons in facial expression or in calisthenics. It seems a pity that in motion pictures should at last have been found the only competition that the ancient marionettes cannot withstand. But aside from the disappearance of those entertaining puppets, all else is gain in the creation of this new art.
Apart from the development of movies as a spectacle, there's been an evolution in their use for various educational purposes that shouldn't be ignored. In fact, this form of use has advanced further in Europe than in the U.S. as a way to demonstrate things in the arts and sciences. You can study animal life, watch a surgery, observe machinery in motion, take lessons in facial expressions, or learn calisthenics. It's a shame that movies have become the only competition that traditional marionettes can't keep up with. But aside from the decline of those entertaining puppets, everything else is a win in the creation of this new art.
The work at the Edison laboratory in the development of the motion picture was as usual intense and concentrated, and, as might be expected, many of the early experiments were quite primitive in their character until command had been secured of relatively perfect apparatus. The subjects registered jerkily by the films were crude and amusing, such as of Fred Ott's sneeze, Carmencita dancing, Italians and their performing bears, fencing, trapeze stunts, horsemanship, blacksmithing—just simple movements without any attempt to portray the silent drama. One curious incident of this early study occurred when "Jim" Corbett was asked to box a few rounds in front of the camera, with a "dark un" to be selected locally. This was agreed to, and a celebrated bruiser was brought over from Newark. When this "sparring partner" came to face Corbett in the imitation ring he was so paralyzed with terror he could hardly move. It was just after Corbett had won one of his big battles as a prize-fighter, and the dismay of his opponent was excusable. The "boys" at the laboratory still laugh consumedly when they tell about it.
The work at the Edison lab on developing the motion picture was as intense and focused as ever, and, as you might expect, many early experiments were pretty basic until they had access to better equipment. The subjects captured on film were shaky and funny, featuring things like Fred Ott's sneeze, Carmencita dancing, Italians with their performing bears, fencing, trapeze acts, horsemanship, and blacksmithing—just simple actions without any effort to convey a silent story. One interesting incident during this early stage happened when "Jim" Corbett was asked to box a few rounds in front of the camera, with a local "dark un" to be chosen. This was agreed upon, and a well-known fighter was brought in from Newark. However, when this "sparring partner" faced Corbett in the mock ring, he was so terrified he could hardly move. It was just after Corbett had won one of his major fights, so his opponent’s fear was understandable. The "guys" at the lab still laugh hysterically when they share this story.
The first motion-picture studio was dubbed by the staff the "Black Maria." It was an unpretentious oblong wooden structure erected in the laboratory yard, and had a movable roof in the central part. This roof could be raised or lowered at will. The building was covered with black roofing paper, and was also painted black inside. There was no scenery to render gay this lugubrious environment, but the black interior served as the common background for the performers, throwing all their actions into high relief. The whole structure was set on a pivot so that it could be swung around with the sun; and the movable roof was opened so that the accentuating sunlight could stream in upon the actor whose gesticulations were being caught by the camera. These beginnings and crudities are very remote from the elaborate and expensive paraphernalia and machinery with which the art is furnished to-day.
The first movie studio was called the "Black Maria" by the team. It was a simple rectangular wooden building built in the lab yard, featuring a movable roof in the center that could be raised or lowered as needed. The structure was covered with black roofing paper and painted black on the inside. There was no scenery to brighten up the gloomy atmosphere, but the dark interior provided a consistent backdrop for the performers, highlighting their actions. The entire building was mounted on a pivot so it could be rotated to follow the sun, and the movable roof was opened to let the sunlight illuminate the actor's gestures as the camera recorded. These early days and their rough setups are a far cry from the sophisticated and costly equipment used in the industry today.
At the present time the studios in which motion pictures are taken are expensive and pretentious affairs. An immense building of glass, with all the properties and stage-settings of a regular theatre, is required. The Bronx Park studio of the Edison company cost at least one hundred thousand dollars, while the well-known house of Pathe Freres in France—one of Edison's licensees—makes use of no fewer than seven of these glass theatres. All of the larger producers of pictures in this country and abroad employ regular stock companies of actors, men and women selected especially for their skill in pantomime, although, as most observers have perhaps suspected, in the actual taking of the pictures the performers are required to carry on an animated and prepared dialogue with the same spirit and animation as on the regular stage. Before setting out on the preparation of a picture, the book is first written—known in the business as a scenario—giving a complete statement as to the scenery, drops and background, and the sequence of events, divided into scenes as in an ordinary play. These are placed in the hands of a "producer," corresponding to a stage-director, generally an actor or theatrical man of experience, with a highly developed dramatic instinct. The various actors are selected, parts are assigned, and the scene-painters are set to work on the production of the desired scenery. Before the photographing of a scene, a long series of rehearsals takes place, the incidents being gone over and over again until the actors are "letter perfect." So persistent are the producers in the matter of rehearsals and the refining and elaboration of details, that frequently a picture that may be actually photographed and reproduced in fifteen minutes, may require two or three weeks for its production. After the rehearsal of a scene has advanced sufficiently to suit the critical requirements of the producer, the camera man is in requisition, and he is consulted as to lighting so as to produce the required photographic effect. Preferably, of course, sunlight is used whenever possible, hence the glass studios; but on dark days, and when night-work is necessary, artificial light of enormous candle-power is used, either mercury arcs or ordinary arc lights of great size and number.
Nowadays, the studios where movies are filmed are quite expensive and showy. A massive glass building, complete with all the props and stage settings of a standard theater, is necessary. The Bronx Park studio of the Edison Company cost at least one hundred thousand dollars, while the well-known Pathe Freres studio in France—one of Edison’s licensees—uses no fewer than seven of these glass theaters. All major film producers in this country and abroad employ regular cast members, men and women specifically chosen for their pantomime skills. However, as most observers might have guessed, during actual filming, the performers are expected to engage in lively and prepared dialogue with the same spirit as on a traditional stage. Before starting the preparation of a movie, the script, referred to in the industry as a scenario, is written first. This scenario provides a complete outline of the scenery, drops, and background, as well as the sequence of events, broken down into scenes like in a regular play. This is handed over to a "producer," akin to a stage director, who is usually an actor or theatrical professional with a strong dramatic instinct. The various actors are chosen, roles are assigned, and the scene painters begin working on the required scenery. Before filming a scene, there are numerous rehearsals, going over the events repeatedly until the actors are "letter perfect." The producers are so dedicated to rehearsals and refining details that a scene that might actually be filmed in fifteen minutes can often take two or three weeks to prepare. Once the rehearsal of a scene meets the producer’s critical standards, the cameraman is called in, and he discusses lighting to achieve the desired photographic effect. Ideally, sunlight is used whenever possible, which is why the glass studios are built; but on cloudy days or when night shoots are required, powerful artificial lights are used, such as mercury arcs or large conventional arc lights.
Under all conditions the light is properly screened and diffused to suit the critical eye of the camera man. All being in readiness, the actual picture is taken, the actors going through their rehearsed parts, the producer standing out of the range of the camera, and with a megaphone to his lips yelling out his instructions, imprecations, and approval, and the camera man grinding at the crank of the camera and securing the pictures at the rate of twenty or more per second, making a faithful and permanent record of every movement and every change of facial expression. At the end of the scene the negative is developed in the ordinary way, and is then ready for use in the printing of the positives for sale. When a further scene in the play takes place in the same setting, and without regard to its position in the plot, it is taken up, rehearsed, and photographed in the same way, and afterward all the scenes are cemented together in the proper sequence, and form the complete negative. Frequently, therefore, in the production of a motion-picture play, the first and the last scene may be taken successively, the only thing necessary being, of course, that after all is done the various scenes should be arranged in their proper order. The frames, having served their purpose, now go back to the scene-painter for further use. All pictures are not taken in studios, because when light and weather permit and proper surroundings can be secured outside, scenes can best be obtained with natural scenery—city streets, woods, and fields. The great drawback to the taking of pictures out-of-doors, however, is the inevitable crowd, attracted by the novelty of the proceedings, which makes the camera man's life a torment by getting into the field of his instrument. The crowds are patient, however, and in one Edison picture involving the blowing up of a bridge by the villain of the piece and the substitution of a pontoon bridge by a company of engineers just in time to allow the heroine to pass over in her automobile, more than a thousand people stood around for almost an entire day waiting for the tedious rehearsals to end and the actual performance to begin. Frequently large bodies of men are used in pictures, such as troops of soldiers, and it is an open secret that for weeks during the Boer War regularly equipped British and Boer armies confronted each other on the peaceful hills of Orange, New Jersey, ready to enact before the camera the stirring events told by the cable from the seat of hostilities. These conflicts were essentially harmless, except in one case during the battle of Spion Kopje, when "General Cronje," in his efforts to fire a wooden cannon, inadvertently dropped his fuse into a large glass bottle containing gunpowder. The effect was certainly most dramatic, and created great enthusiasm among the many audiences which viewed the completed production; but the unfortunate general, who is still an employee, was taken to the hospital, and even now, twelve years afterward, he says with a grin that whenever he has a moment of leisure he takes the time to pick a few pieces of glass from his person!
Under all conditions, the light is properly filtered and softened to meet the exacting standards of the cameraman. Once everything is set, the actual shot is taken, with the actors performing their rehearsed roles, the producer standing out of the camera's view, yelling out instructions, exclamations, and praise through a megaphone, and the cameraman cranking the camera to capture images at a rate of twenty or more per second, creating a reliable and lasting record of every movement and facial expression. After the scene ends, the negative is developed as usual and is ready for printing the positives for sale. When another scene in the play takes place in the same setting, regardless of its order in the story, it is rehearsed and filmed in the same way, and later all the scenes are combined in the correct sequence to form the complete negative. Therefore, in creating a motion picture, the first and last scenes can often be filmed one after the other; the key is to ensure that all scenes are arranged in their proper order afterward. The frames, after their use, go back to the scene painter for reuse. Not all scenes are shot in studios, as outdoor filming can provide better settings when the weather and lighting are suitable, using natural backdrops like city streets, forests, and fields. However, a major drawback of outdoor filming is the inevitable crowd drawn by the novelty, which often complicates the cameraman’s work by getting into the shot. The crowds are generally patient; for example, in one Edison production where the villain blew up a bridge and engineers quickly replaced it with a pontoon bridge just in time for the heroine to drive over in her car, over a thousand people waited for almost an entire day for the long rehearsals to conclude and the actual filming to start. Large groups of people, like soldier troops, are often featured in films, and it’s well-known that during the Boer War, regularly equipped British and Boer armies faced off on the peaceful hills of Orange, New Jersey, ready to reenact the stirring events reported from the battlefield. These scenarios were mostly harmless, except for one incident during the Battle of Spion Kopje when "General Cronje," attempting to fire a wooden cannon, accidentally dropped his fuse into a large glass bottle filled with gunpowder. The outcome was quite dramatic and generated a lot of excitement among the many audiences who watched the finished film; however, the unfortunate general, who is still an employee, ended up in the hospital, and even twelve years later, he laughs that whenever he has some free time, he picks out a few pieces of glass from his body!
Edison's great contribution to the regular stage was the incandescent electric lamp, which enabled the production of scenic effects never before even dreamed of, but which we accept now with so much complacency. Yet with the motion picture, effects are secured that could not be reproduced to the slightest extent on the real stage. The villain, overcome by a remorseful conscience, sees on the wall of the room the very crime which he committed, with HIMSELF as the principal actor; one of the easy effects of double exposure. The substantial and ofttimes corpulent ghost or spirit of the real stage has been succeeded by an intangible wraith, as transparent and unsubstantial as may be demanded in the best book of fairy tales—more double exposure. A man emerges from the water with a splash, ascends feet foremost ten yards or more, makes a graceful curve and lands on a spring-board, runs down it to the bank, and his clothes fly gently up from the ground and enclose his person—all unthinkable in real life, but readily possible by running the motion-picture film backward! The fairy prince commands the princess to appear, consigns the bad brothers to instant annihilation, turns the witch into a cat, confers life on inanimate things; and many more startling and apparently incomprehensible effects are carried out with actual reality, by stop-work photography. In one case, when the command for the heroine to come forth is given, the camera is stopped, the young woman walks to the desired spot, and the camera is again started; the effect to the eye—not knowing of this little by-play—is as if she had instantly appeared from space. The other effects are perhaps obvious, and the field and opportunities are absolutely unlimited. Other curious effects are secured by taking the pictures at a different speed from that at which they are exhibited. If, for example, a scene occupying thirty seconds is reproduced in ten seconds, the movements will be three times as fast, and vice versa. Many scenes familiar to the reader, showing automobiles tearing along the road and rounding corners at an apparently reckless speed, are really pictures of slow and dignified movements reproduced at a high speed.
Edison's major contribution to the theater was the incandescent electric lamp, which allowed for scenic effects that were previously unimaginable, but that we now take for granted. However, with motion pictures, we can create effects that can't be replicated, even in the slightest, on a real stage. The villain, haunted by guilt, sees the very crime he committed projected on the wall, with HIMSELF as the main actor—thanks to double exposure. The heavy and often bulky ghosts or spirits of the stage have been replaced by ethereal wraiths, as light and insubstantial as you might find in a classic fairy tale—another example of double exposure. A man splashes out of the water, shoots up feet first for ten yards or more, elegantly arcs, and lands on a springboard, then runs down it to the bank with his clothes magically flying up from the ground to wrap around him—all impossible in real life, but easily achieved by running the motion picture film backward! The fairy prince commands the princess to appear, instantly eliminates the evil brothers, transforms the witch into a cat, and brings inanimate objects to life. Many more shocking and seemingly inexplicable effects are achieved with actual reality using stop-motion photography. In one instance, when directing the heroine to come forward, the camera is stopped, the young woman walks to the right spot, and then the camera is started again; to the audience, unaware of this little trick, it looks like she magically appeared out of thin air. Other effects might be obvious, and the possibilities are absolutely endless. Some intriguing effects come from filming at different speeds than the playback speed. For example, if a scene that takes thirty seconds to play out is shown in ten seconds, the actions will appear three times as fast, and the opposite is true as well. Many scenes you may recognize, featuring cars speeding down the road and taking corners at breakneck speed, are actually footage of slow, measured motions played back at high speed.
Brief reference has been made to motion pictures of educational subjects, and in this field there are very great opportunities for development. The study of geography, scenes and incidents in foreign countries, showing the lives and customs and surroundings of other peoples, is obviously more entertaining to the child when actively depicted on the screen than when merely described in words. The lives of great men, the enacting of important historical events, the reproduction of great works of literature, if visually presented to the child must necessarily impress his mind with greater force than if shown by mere words. We predict that the time is not far distant when, in many of our public schools, two or three hours a week will be devoted to this rational and effective form of education.
Brief mention has been made of educational films, and in this area, there are significant opportunities for growth. Studying geography, as well as scenes and events in foreign countries that showcase the lives, customs, and environments of other cultures, is clearly more engaging for children when presented visually on screen rather than just described in words. The lives of influential figures, the reenactment of key historical moments, and the portrayal of classic literature, when shown to children, will surely leave a stronger impact on their minds than if conveyed only through text. We anticipate that it won't be long before many of our public schools dedicate two or three hours a week to this logical and effective approach to education.
By applying microphotography to motion pictures an additional field is opened up, one phase of which may be the study of germ life and bacteria, so that our future medical students may become as familiar with the habits and customs of the Anthrax bacillus, for example, as of the domestic cat.
By using microphotography in movies, a new area is created, one aspect of which could be the study of germ life and bacteria. This way, future medical students could become just as familiar with the behavior and characteristics of the Anthrax bacillus, for instance, as they are with a household cat.
From whatever point of view the subject is approached, the fact remains that in the motion picture, perhaps more than with any other invention, Edison has created an art that must always make a special appeal to the mind and emotions of men, and although so far it has not advanced much beyond the field of amusement, it contains enormous possibilities for serious development in the future. Let us not think too lightly of the humble five-cent theatre with its gaping crowd following with breathless interest the vicissitudes of the beautiful heroine. Before us lies an undeveloped land of opportunity which is destined to play an important part in the growth and welfare of the human race.
No matter how you look at it, the reality is that in film, perhaps more than with any other invention, Edison has created an art form that will always resonate with people's minds and feelings. Although it hasn't progressed much beyond just entertainment so far, it holds great potential for serious development in the future. We shouldn't underestimate the simple five-cent theater with its captivated audience eagerly following the ups and downs of the beautiful heroine. Ahead of us is an untapped land of opportunity that is set to play a significant role in the growth and well-being of humanity.
CHAPTER XXII
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EDISON STORAGE BATTERY
IT is more than a hundred years since the elementary principle of the storage battery or "accumulator" was detected by a Frenchman named Gautherot; it is just fifty years since another Frenchman, named Plante, discovered that on taking two thin plates of sheet lead, immersing them in dilute sulphuric acid, and passing an electric current through the cell, the combination exhibited the ability to give back part of the original charging current, owing to the chemical changes and reactions set up. Plante coiled up his sheets into a very handy cell like a little roll of carpet or pastry; but the trouble was that the battery took a long time to "form." One sheet becoming coated with lead peroxide and the other with finely divided or spongy metallic lead, they would receive current, and then, even after a long period of inaction, furnish or return an electromotive force of from 1.85 to 2.2 volts. This ability to store up electrical energy produced by dynamos in hours otherwise idle, whether driven by steam, wind, or water, was a distinct advance in the art; but the sensational step was taken about 1880, when Faure in France and Brush in America broke away from the slow and weary process of "forming" the plates, and hit on clever methods of furnishing them "ready made," so to speak, by dabbing red lead onto lead-grid plates, just as butter is spread on a slice of home-made bread. This brought the storage battery at once into use as a practical, manufactured piece of apparatus; and the world was captivated with the idea. The great English scientist, Sir William Thomson, went wild with enthusiasm when a Faure "box of electricity" was brought over from Paris to him in 1881 containing a million foot-pounds of stored energy. His biographer, Dr. Sylvanus P. Thompson, describes him as lying ill in bed with a wounded leg, and watching results with an incandescent lamp fastened to his bed curtain by a safety-pin, and lit up by current from the little Faure cell. Said Sir William: "It is going to be a most valuable, practical affair—as valuable as water-cisterns to people whether they had or had not systems of water-pipes and water-supply." Indeed, in one outburst of panegyric the shrewd physicist remarked that he saw in it "a realization of the most ardently and increasingly felt scientific aspiration of his life—an aspiration which he hardly dared to expect or to see realized." A little later, however, Sir William, always cautious and canny, began to discover the inherent defects of the primitive battery, as to disintegration, inefficiency, costliness, etc., and though offered tempting inducements, declined to lend his name to its financial introduction. Nevertheless, he accepted the principle as valuable, and put the battery to actual use.
It’s been over a hundred years since the basic principle of the storage battery or "accumulator" was found by a Frenchman named Gautherot. Fifty years ago, another Frenchman, Plante, discovered that by taking two thin sheets of lead, immersing them in diluted sulfuric acid, and passing an electric current through the cell, the setup could return part of the original charging current due to the chemical changes that occurred. Plante rolled up his sheets into a compact cell, similar to a small roll of carpet or pastry; however, the downside was that the battery required a long time to "form." One sheet became coated with lead peroxide while the other developed a spongy metal lead coating, allowing it to receive current and then, even after a prolonged period of inactivity, generate an electromotive force between 1.85 and 2.2 volts. This capacity to store electrical energy produced by generators during otherwise idle hours, powered by steam, wind, or water, was a clear advancement in technology. But the groundbreaking move came around 1880 when Faure in France and Brush in America found ways to skip the slow and tedious "forming" process by applying red lead onto lead-grid plates, similar to how butter is spread on homemade bread. This innovation made the storage battery practical and readily available, captivating the world. The great English scientist, Sir William Thomson, was extremely excited when a Faure "box of electricity," containing a million foot-pounds of stored energy, was sent to him from Paris in 1881. His biographer, Dr. Sylvanus P. Thompson, recounts how he, bedridden with a leg injury, watched the results with an incandescent lamp attached to his bed curtain with a safety pin, powered by the little Faure cell. Sir William stated: "It is going to be a most valuable, practical thing—just as valuable as water cisterns for people, whether or not they had water pipes and supply systems." Indeed, in a moment of praise, the insightful physicist remarked that he saw it as "a realization of the most passionate and growing scientific aspiration of his life—an aspiration he hardly dared to expect to see come true." However, a little later, Sir William, ever cautious and wise, began to notice the inherent flaws of the early battery, such as disintegration, inefficiency, high cost, etc. Although he was presented with enticing incentives, he chose not to lend his name for its financial promotion. Still, he recognized the principle’s value and used the battery in practice.
For many years after this episode, the modern lead-lead type of battery thus brought forward with so great a flourish of trumpets had a hard time of it. Edison's attitude toward it, even as a useful supplement to his lighting system, was always one of scepticism, and he remarked contemptuously that the best storage battery he knew was a ton of coal. The financial fortunes of the battery, on both sides of the Atlantic, were as varied and as disastrous as its industrial; but it did at last emerge, and "made good." By 1905, the production of lead-lead storage batteries in the United States alone had reached a value for the year of nearly $3,000,000, and it has increased greatly since that time. The storage battery is now regarded as an important and indispensable adjunct in nearly all modern electric-lighting and electric-railway systems of any magnitude; and in 1909, in spite of its weight, it had found adoption in over ten thousand automobiles of the truck, delivery wagon, pleasure carriage, and runabout types in America.
For many years after this event, the modern lead-acid battery that was introduced with such fanfare struggled significantly. Edison's perspective on it, even as a useful addition to his lighting system, was always skeptical, and he dismissively stated that the best storage battery he knew of was a ton of coal. The financial situation of the battery, on both sides of the Atlantic, was as inconsistent and disastrous as its industrial fate; however, it eventually succeeded and proved itself. By 1905, the production of lead-acid storage batteries in the United States alone had reached nearly $3,000,000 for the year, and it has grown significantly since then. Today, the storage battery is considered an important and essential component in almost all modern electric lighting and electric railway systems of any size; and by 1909, despite its weight, it had been adopted in over ten thousand vehicles in America, including trucks, delivery wagons, pleasure cars, and runabouts.
Edison watched closely all this earlier development for about fifteen years, not changing his mind as to what he regarded as the incurable defects of the lead-lead type, but coming gradually to the conclusion that if a storage battery of some other and better type could be brought forward, it would fulfil all the early hopes, however extravagant, of such men as Kelvin (Sir William Thomson), and would become as necessary and as universal as the incandescent lamp or the electric motor. The beginning of the present century found him at his point of new departure.
Edison paid close attention to all this early development for about fifteen years, maintaining his belief in the serious flaws of the lead-lead type. However, he gradually came to the conclusion that if a storage battery of a different and better type could be developed, it would meet all the early hopes, no matter how unrealistic, of people like Kelvin (Sir William Thomson), and would become as essential and widespread as the incandescent lamp or the electric motor. The start of the current century found him ready to take a new direction.
Generally speaking, non-technical and uninitiated persons have a tendency to regard an invention as being more or less the ultimate result of some happy inspiration. And, indeed, there is no doubt that such may be the fact in some instances; but in most cases the inventor has intentionally set out to accomplish a definite and desired result—mostly through the application of the known laws of the art in which he happens to be working. It is rarely, however, that a man will start out deliberately, as Edison did, to evolve a radically new type of such an intricate device as the storage battery, with only a meagre clew and a vague starting-point.
Generally speaking, non-technical people and those unfamiliar with the field tend to see an invention as the result of a lucky inspiration. And, while that might be true in some cases, most of the time, the inventor has intentionally set out to achieve a specific goal—often by applying the understood principles of the field they’re working in. However, it’s rare for someone to deliberately begin, as Edison did, to create a completely new kind of complex device like the storage battery, starting with just a small hint and a vague idea.
In view of the successful outcome of the problem which, in 1900, he undertook to solve, it will be interesting to review his mental attitude at that period. It has already been noted at the end of a previous chapter that on closing the magnetic iron-ore concentrating plant at Edison, New Jersey, he resolved to work on a new type of storage battery. It was about this time that, in the course of a conversation with Mr. R. H. Beach, then of the street-railway department of the General Electric Company, he said: "Beach, I don't think Nature would be so unkind as to withhold the secret of a GOOD storage battery if a real earnest hunt for it is made. I'm going to hunt."
Given the successful outcome of the problem he took on in 1900, it’s worth looking back at his mindset during that time. As noted at the end of a previous chapter, after shutting down the magnetic iron-ore concentrating plant in Edison, New Jersey, he decided to work on a new kind of storage battery. Around this time, during a conversation with Mr. R. H. Beach, who was then in the street-railway department of the General Electric Company, he said: "Beach, I don’t believe Nature would be so unkind as to keep the secret of a GOOD storage battery from us if we genuinely search for it. I’m going to search."
Frequently Edison has been asked what he considers the secret of achievement. To this query he has invariably replied: "Hard work, based on hard thinking." The laboratory records bear the fullest witness that he has consistently followed out this prescription to the utmost. The perfection of all his great inventions has been signalized by patient, persistent, and incessant effort which, recognizing nothing short of success, has resulted in the ultimate accomplishment of his ideas. Optimistic and hopeful to a high degree, Edison has the happy faculty of beginning the day as open-minded as a child—yesterday's disappointments and failures discarded and discounted by the alluring possibilities of to-morrow.
Edison is often asked what he thinks is the key to success. He always responds, "Hard work, based on hard thinking." The records from his lab show that he has consistently followed this advice to the fullest. The success of all his great inventions has come from patient, persistent, and relentless effort, which aimed for nothing less than success and led to the actual realization of his ideas. Optimistic and highly hopeful, Edison has a wonderful ability to start each day with the open-mindedness of a child—letting go of yesterday's disappointments and failures, inspired by the promising possibilities of tomorrow.
Of all his inventions, it is doubtful whether any one of them has called forth more original thought, work, perseverance, ingenuity, and monumental patience than the one we are now dealing with. One of his associates who has been through the many years of the storage-battery drudgery with him said: "If Edison's experiments, investigations, and work on this storage battery were all that he had ever done, I should say that he was not only a notable inventor, but also a great man. It is almost impossible to appreciate the enormous difficulties that have been overcome."
Of all his inventions, it's hard to say if any of them have inspired more original thinking, effort, perseverance, creativity, and incredible patience than the one we’re discussing now. One of his colleagues, who has endured the years of hard work on the storage battery alongside him, said: "If Edison's experiments, research, and efforts on this storage battery were all he had ever done, I would say he’s not just a remarkable inventor but also a great man. It’s nearly impossible to understand the huge challenges that have been overcome."
From a beginning which was made practically in the dark, it was not until he had completed more than ten thousand experiments that he obtained any positive preliminary results whatever. Through all this vast amount of research there had been no previous signs of the electrical action he was looking for. These experiments had extended over many months of constant work by day and night, but there was no breakdown of Edison's faith in ultimate success—no diminution of his sanguine and confident expectations. The failure of an experiment simply meant to him that he had found something else that would not work, thus bringing the possible goal a little nearer by a process of painstaking elimination.
Starting from almost complete darkness, it wasn't until he had run over ten thousand experiments that he got any clear initial results. Throughout this extensive research, there were no earlier indications of the electrical action he was seeking. These experiments spanned many months of constant work day and night, but there was no wavering in Edison’s belief in eventual success—his hopeful and confident expectations remained intact. The failure of an experiment simply meant he had discovered another approach that didn't work, thus moving the potential goal a bit closer through meticulous elimination.
Now, however, after these many months of arduous toil, in which he had examined and tested practically all the known elements in numerous chemical combinations, the electric action he sought for had been obtained, thus affording him the first inkling of the secret that he had industriously tried to wrest from Nature. It should be borne in mind that from the very outset Edison had disdained any intention of following in the only tracks then known by employing lead and sulphuric acid as the components of a successful storage battery. Impressed with what he considered the serious inherent defects of batteries made of these materials, and the tremendously complex nature of the chemical reactions taking place in all types of such cells, he determined boldly at the start that he would devise a battery without lead, and one in which an alkaline solution could be used—a form which would, he firmly believed, be inherently less subject to decay and dissolution than the standard type, which after many setbacks had finally won its way to an annual production of many thousands of cells, worth millions of dollars.
Now, after many months of hard work, during which he examined and tested nearly all known elements in various chemical combinations, he had finally achieved the electric action he was looking for. This gave him his first hint of the secret he had been trying to wrest from Nature. It's important to note that from the beginning, Edison had no intention of following the only known path at the time, which was to use lead and sulfuric acid as the components of a successful storage battery. He believed that there were serious inherent flaws in batteries made from these materials, as well as a very complex range of chemical reactions happening in all types of these cells. So, he boldly decided from the start that he would create a battery without lead, one that could use an alkaline solution—a type that he was convinced would be less likely to decay and dissolve compared to the standard type, which, after many challenges, had finally reached annual production of thousands of cells worth millions of dollars.
Two or three thousand of the first experiments followed the line of his well-known primary battery in the attempted employment of copper oxide as an element in a new type of storage cell; but its use offered no advantages, and the hunt was continued in other directions and pursued until Edison satisfied himself by a vast number of experiments that nickel and iron possessed the desirable qualifications he was in search of.
Two or three thousand of the initial experiments followed the path of his famous primary battery, trying to use copper oxide as a component in a new type of storage cell. However, it turned out to be unhelpful, so the search continued in other areas. Edison went on to conduct a huge number of experiments until he convinced himself that nickel and iron had the qualities he was looking for.
This immense amount of investigation which had consumed so many months of time, and which had culminated in the discovery of a series of reactions between nickel and iron that bore great promise, brought Edison merely within sight of a strange and hitherto unexplored country. Slowly but surely the results of the last few thousands of his preliminary experiments had pointed inevitably to a new and fruitful region ahead. He had discovered the hidden passage and held the clew which he had so industriously sought. And now, having outlined a definite path, Edison was all afire to push ahead vigorously in order that he might enter in and possess the land.
This huge amount of research, which took many months and led to the discovery of a series of reactions between nickel and iron that showed great promise, only brought Edison to the edge of an unfamiliar and uncharted territory. Slowly but surely, the results of his recent experiments had undeniably indicated a new and promising area ahead. He had found the hidden pathway and held the clue he had been tirelessly searching for. Now, with a clear direction mapped out, Edison was eager to move forward energetically so he could enter and claim the land.
It is a trite saying that "history repeats itself," and certainly no axiom carries more truth than this when applied to the history of each of Edison's important inventions. The development of the storage battery has been no exception; indeed, far from otherwise, for in the ten years that have elapsed since the time he set himself and his mechanics, chemists, machinists, and experimenters at work to develop a practical commercial cell, the old story of incessant and persistent efforts so manifest in the working out of other inventions was fully repeated.
It's a well-worn saying that "history repeats itself," and this couldn’t be more true when we look at the history of each of Edison’s significant inventions. The progress of the storage battery is no different; in fact, it exemplifies this. Over the ten years since he put himself and his team of mechanics, chemists, machinists, and experimenters to work on creating a practical commercial cell, the same pattern of continuous and relentless efforts seen in the development of other inventions has played out once again.
Very soon after he had decided upon the use of nickel and iron as the elemental metals for his storage battery, Edison established a chemical plant at Silver Lake, New Jersey, a few miles from the Orange laboratory, on land purchased some time previously. This place was the scene of the further experiments to develop the various chemical forms of nickel and iron, and to determine by tests what would be best adapted for use in cells manufactured on a commercial scale. With a little handful of selected experimenters gathered about him, Edison settled down to one of his characteristic struggles for supremacy. To some extent it was a revival of the old Menlo Park days (or, rather, nights). Some of these who had worked on the preliminary experiments, with the addition of a few new-comers, toiled together regardless of passing time and often under most discouraging circumstances, but with that remarkable esprit de corps that has ever marked Edison's relations with his co-workers, and that has contributed so largely to the successful carrying out of his ideas.
Very soon after he decided to use nickel and iron as the main materials for his storage battery, Edison set up a chemical plant at Silver Lake, New Jersey, just a few miles from the Orange laboratory, on land he had bought earlier. This location became the center for further experiments to develop the different chemical forms of nickel and iron, and to determine through tests what would be best suited for use in cells produced on a commercial scale. With a small group of chosen experimenters around him, Edison dug into one of his typical battles for innovation. It was somewhat of a revival of the old Menlo Park days (or rather, nights). Some of those who had worked on the initial experiments, along with a few newcomers, worked together tirelessly despite the passing time and often under very discouraging conditions, but with that amazing team spirit that has always characterized Edison's relationships with his coworkers, contributing significantly to the successful realization of his ideas.
The group that took part in these early years of Edison's arduous labors included his old-time assistant, Fred Ott, together with his chemist, J. W. Aylsworth, as well as E. J. Ross, Jr., W. E. Holland, and Ralph Arbogast, and a little later W. G. Bee, all of whom have grown up with the battery and still devote their energies to its commercial development. One of these workers, relating the strenuous experiences of these few years, says: "It was hard work and long hours, but still there were some things that made life pleasant. One of them was the supper-hour we enjoyed when we worked nights. Mr. Edison would have supper sent in about midnight, and we all sat down together, including himself. Work was forgotten for the time, and all hands were ready for fun. I have very pleasant recollections of Mr. Edison at these times. He would always relax and help to make a good time, and on some occasions I have seen him fairly overflow with animal spirits, just like a boy let out from school. After the supper-hour was over, however, he again became the serious, energetic inventor, deeply immersed in the work at hand.
The group that participated in these early years of Edison's demanding work included his longtime assistant, Fred Ott, along with his chemist, J. W. Aylsworth, as well as E. J. Ross, Jr., W. E. Holland, and Ralph Arbogast, and later W. G. Bee, all of whom have grown alongside the battery and continue to dedicate their efforts to its commercial development. One of these workers, reflecting on the intense experiences of those few years, says: "It was hard work and long hours, but there were also some things that made life enjoyable. One of those was the supper we had when we worked nights. Mr. Edison would have dinner brought in around midnight, and we all sat down together, including him. Work would be forgotten for the moment, and everyone was ready for some fun. I have very fond memories of Mr. Edison during these times. He would always relax and help create a good atmosphere, and on some occasions, I saw him bursting with energy, just like a kid let out of school. After supper was over, though, he would become the serious, energetic inventor again, fully focused on the work at hand."
"He was very fond of telling and hearing stories, and always appreciated a joke. I remember one that he liked to get off on us once in a while. Our lighting plant was in duplicate, and about 12.30 or 1 o'clock in the morning, at the close of the supper-hour, a change would be made from one plant to the other, involving the gradual extinction of the electric lights and their slowly coming up to candle-power again, the whole change requiring probably about thirty seconds. Sometimes, as this was taking place, Edison would fold his hands, compose himself as if he were in sound sleep, and when the lights were full again would apparently wake up, with the remark, 'Well, boys, we've had a fine rest; now let's pitch into work again.'"
"He really loved telling and listening to stories, and he always enjoyed a good joke. I remember one he liked to play on us every now and then. Our lighting system had a backup, and around 12:30 or 1 o'clock in the morning, right after dinner, we would switch from one system to the other, which meant that the electric lights would slowly dim and then brighten back up, taking about thirty seconds. Sometimes, during this transition, Edison would fold his hands and pretend to be sound asleep, and when the lights were fully back on, he would 'wake up' and say, 'Well, guys, we've had a nice rest; now let's get back to work.'"
Another interesting and amusing reminiscence of this period of activity has been gathered from another of the family of experimenters: "Sometimes, when Mr. Edison had been working long hours, he would want to have a short sleep. It was one of the funniest things I ever witnessed to see him crawl into an ordinary roll-top desk and curl up and take a nap. If there was a sight that was still more funny, it was to see him turn over on his other side, all the time remaining in the desk. He would use several volumes of Watts's Dictionary of Chemistry for a pillow, and we fellows used to say that he absorbed the contents during his sleep, judging from the flow of new ideas he had on waking."
Another interesting and funny memory from this period of activity comes from another family member who experimented: "Sometimes, when Mr. Edison had been working long hours, he'd want to take a short nap. It was one of the funniest things I ever saw to watch him crawl into a regular roll-top desk and curl up to sleep. If there was something even funnier, it was seeing him roll over onto his other side, still inside the desk. He would use several volumes of Watts's Dictionary of Chemistry as a pillow, and we used to joke that he absorbed the information while he slept, based on the flood of new ideas he had when he woke up."
Such incidents as these serve merely to illustrate the lighter moments that stand out in relief against the more sombre background of the strenuous years, for, of all the absorbingly busy periods of Edison's inventive life, the first five years of the storage-battery era was one of the very busiest of them all. It was not that there remained any basic principle to be discovered or simplified, for that had already been done; but it was in the effort to carry these principles into practice that there arose the numerous difficulties that at times seemed insurmountable. But, according to another co-worker, "Edison seemed pleased when he used to run up against a serious difficulty. It would seem to stiffen his backbone and make him more prolific of new ideas. For a time I thought I was foolish to imagine such a thing, but I could never get away from the impression that he really appeared happy when he ran up against a serious snag. That was in my green days, and I soon learned that the failure of an experiment never discourages him unless it is by reason of the carelessness of the man making it. Then Edison gets disgusted. If it fails on its merits, he doesn't worry or fret about it, but, on the contrary, regards it as a useful fact learned; remains cheerful and tries something else. I have known him to reverse an unsuccessful experiment and come out all right."
Such incidents highlight the lighter moments that stand out against the more serious background of the intense years. Out of all the incredibly busy phases of Edison's inventive life, the first five years of the storage-battery era were among the busiest. There wasn't any fundamental principle left to discover or simplify since that had already been achieved; however, carrying these principles into practice brought up numerous challenges that sometimes felt overwhelming. According to another co-worker, "Edison seemed pleased when he encountered a serious difficulty. It seemed to strengthen his determination and inspire him with new ideas. For a while, I thought I was imagining things, but I never shook the feeling that he genuinely appeared happy when facing a serious obstacle. That was during my inexperienced days, and I quickly learned that he was never discouraged by the failure of an experiment unless it was due to someone’s carelessness. Then, Edison would become frustrated. If it failed on its own merits, he wouldn’t worry or stress about it; instead, he viewed it as a valuable lesson learned, stayed positive, and tried something else. I’ve seen him take an unsuccessful experiment and turn it around successfully."
To follow Edison's trail in detail through the innumerable twists and turns of his experimentation and research on the storage battery, during the past ten years, would not be in keeping with the scope of this narrative, nor would it serve any useful purpose. Besides, such details would fill a big volume. The narrative, however, would not be complete without some mention of the general outline of his work, and reference may be made briefly to a few of the chief items. And lest the reader think that the word "innumerable" may have been carelessly or hastily used above, we would quote the reply of one of the laboratory assistants when asked how many experiments had been made on the Edison storage battery since the year 1900: "Goodness only knows! We used to number our experiments consecutively from 1 to 10,000, and when we got up to 10,000 we turned back to 1 and ran up to 10,000 again, and so on. We ran through several series—I don't know how many, and have lost track of them now, but it was not far from fifty thousand."
Following Edison's journey in detail through the countless twists and turns of his experimentation and research on the storage battery over the past ten years wouldn’t fit the scope of this narrative, nor would it have any practical purpose. Besides, such details would fill a large volume. However, the narrative wouldn’t be complete without mentioning some of the general outline of his work, so we can briefly go over a few key points. And just to address any concern that the term "countless" was used lightly, we can share the response from one of the lab assistants when asked how many experiments had been conducted on the Edison storage battery since 1900: "Goodness only knows! We used to number our experiments consecutively from 1 to 10,000, and when we reached 10,000, we started over at 1 and went up to 10,000 again, and so on. We went through several series—I’m not sure how many, and I've lost track of them now, but it was close to fifty thousand."
From the very first, Edison's broad idea of his storage battery was to make perforated metallic containers having the active materials packed therein; nickel hydrate for the positive and iron oxide for the negative plate. This plan has been adhered to throughout, and has found its consummation in the present form of the completed commercial cell, but in the middle ground which stands between the early crude beginnings and the perfected type of to-day there lies a world of original thought, patient plodding, and achievement.
From the very beginning, Edison's big idea for his storage battery was to create perforated metal containers filled with active materials: nickel hydrate for the positive plate and iron oxide for the negative plate. This approach has been followed consistently and has resulted in the current version of the commercial cell. However, between the rough early stages and the perfected model we have today lies a wealth of original ideas, hard work, and accomplishments.
The first necessity was naturally to obtain the best and purest compounds for active materials. Edison found that comparatively little was known by manufacturing chemists about nickel and iron oxides of the high grade and purity he required. Hence it became necessary for him to establish his own chemical works and put them in charge of men specially trained by himself, with whom he worked. This was the plant at Silver Lake, above referred to. Here, for several years, there was ceaseless activity in the preparation of these chemical compounds by every imaginable process and subsequent testing. Edison's chief chemist says: "We left no stone unturned to find a way of making those chemicals so that they would give the highest results. We carried on the experiments with the two chemicals together. Sometimes the nickel would be ahead in the tests, and then again it would fall behind. To stimulate us to greater improvement, Edison hung up a card which showed the results of tests in milliampere-hours given by the experimental elements as we tried them with the various grades of nickel and iron we had made. This stirred up a great deal of ambition among the boys to push the figures up. Some of our earliest tests showed around 300, but as we improved the material, they gradually crept up to over 500. Just about that time Edison made a trip to Canada, and when he came back we had made such good progress that the figures had crept up to about 1000. I well remember how greatly he was pleased."
The first necessity was obviously to get the best and purest materials for active components. Edison discovered that manufacturing chemists knew relatively little about the high-grade nickel and iron oxides he needed. So, he had to set up his own chemical lab and put it in the hands of specially trained men he had worked with. This was the facility at Silver Lake, mentioned earlier. For several years, there was nonstop activity in preparing these chemical compounds through every possible process and testing them afterward. Edison's lead chemist said, "We did everything we could to find a way to create those chemicals to achieve the best results. We conducted experiments with both chemicals together. Sometimes the nickel performed better in the tests, and then it would lag. To motivate us for greater improvement, Edison posted a card showing the test results in milliampere-hours from the experimental elements as we tried them with various grades of nickel and iron we had produced. This created a lot of drive among the team to increase the numbers. Some of our earliest tests showed around 300, but as we refined the material, those numbers gradually rose to over 500. Around that time, Edison took a trip to Canada, and when he returned, we had made such excellent progress that the figures had climbed to about 1000. I clearly remember how pleased he was."
In speaking of the development of the negative element of the battery, Mr. Aylsworth said: "In like manner the iron element had to be developed and improved; and finally the iron, which had generally enjoyed superiority in capacity over its companion, the nickel element, had to go in training in order to retain its lead, which was imperative, in order to produce a uniform and constant voltage curve. In talking with me one day about the difficulties under which we were working and contrasting them with the phonograph experimentation, Edison said: 'In phonographic work we can use our ears and our eyes, aided with powerful microscopes; but in the battery our difficulties cannot be seen or heard, but must be observed by our mind's eye!' And by reason of the employment of such vision in the past, Edison is now able to see quite clearly through the forest of difficulties after eliminating them one by one."
In discussing the development of the negative element of the battery, Mr. Aylsworth said: "Similarly, the iron element needed to be developed and improved; ultimately, the iron, which had generally been better in capacity than its counterpart, the nickel element, had to get into training to maintain its advantage, which was crucial to producing a consistent and steady voltage curve. One day, when we were talking about the challenges we faced and comparing them to the phonograph experiments, Edison said: 'In phonographic work, we can rely on our ears and eyes, supported by powerful microscopes; but in battery development, our challenges can't be seen or heard—they have to be understood through our mind's eye!' And because of using such insight in the past, Edison can now navigate through the maze of difficulties after tackling them one by one."
The size and shape of the containing pockets in the battery plates or elements and the degree of their perforation were matters that received many years of close study and experiment; indeed, there is still to-day constant work expended on their perfection, although their present general form was decided upon several years ago. The mechanical construction of the battery, as a whole, in its present form, compels instant admiration on account of its beauty and completeness. Mr. Edison has spared neither thought, ingenuity, labor, nor money in the effort to make it the most complete and efficient storage cell obtainable, and the results show that his skill, judgment, and foresight have lost nothing of the power that laid the foundation of, and built up, other great arts at each earlier stage of his career.
The size and shape of the pockets in the battery plates or elements, as well as how much they are perforated, have been the focus of many years of careful study and experimentation. In fact, work continues today to improve them, even though their current general design was established several years ago. The overall mechanical construction of the battery in its present form commands instant admiration due to its beauty and completeness. Mr. Edison has put in a tremendous amount of thought, creativity, effort, and money to create the most complete and efficient storage cell possible, and the results demonstrate that his skill, judgment, and foresight remain just as powerful as they were when he laid the groundwork for other great innovations earlier in his career.
Among the complex and numerous problems that presented themselves in the evolution of the battery was the one concerning the internal conductivity of the positive unit. The nickel hydrate was a poor electrical conductor, and although a metallic nickel pocket might be filled with it, there would not be the desired electrical action unless a conducting substance were mixed with it, and so incorporated and packed that there would be good electrical contact throughout. This proved to be a most knotty and intricate puzzle—tricky and evasive—always leading on and promising something, and at the last slipping away leaving the work undone. Edison's remarkable patience and persistence in dealing with this trying problem and in finally solving it successfully won for him more than ordinary admiration from his associates. One of them, in speaking of the seemingly interminable experiments to overcome this trouble, said: "I guess that question of conductivity of the positive pocket brought lots of gray hairs to his head. I never dreamed a man could have such patience and perseverance. Any other man than Edison would have given the whole thing up a thousand times, but not he! Things looked awfully blue to the whole bunch of us many a time, but he was always hopeful. I remember one time things looked so dark to me that I had just about made up my mind to throw up my job, but some good turn came just then and I didn't. Now I'm glad I held on, for we've got a great future."
Among the many complex problems that arose in the development of the battery was the issue of the internal conductivity of the positive unit. Nickel hydrate didn’t conduct electricity well, and even if a metallic nickel pocket was filled with it, there wouldn’t be the desired electrical action unless a conductive substance was mixed in and packed in a way that ensured good electrical contact throughout. This turned out to be a tricky and intricate puzzle—always elusive, continually promising something, but ultimately slipping away and leaving the work unfinished. Edison's incredible patience and determination in tackling this challenging problem and eventually solving it earned him more than usual admiration from his colleagues. One of them, reflecting on the seemingly endless experiments to resolve this issue, said: "I guess that question of conductivity of the positive pocket brought a lot of gray hairs to his head. I never imagined a man could have such patience and perseverance. Any other person would have given up a thousand times, but not him! Things looked really grim for all of us many times, but he always stayed optimistic. I remember one time things looked so bleak to me that I was just about ready to quit, but then something good happened, and I didn’t. Now I’m glad I stuck with it, because we have a great future ahead."
The difficulty of obtaining good electrical contact in the positive element was indeed Edison's chief trouble for many years. After a great amount of work and experimentation he decided upon a certain form of graphite, which seemed to be suitable for the purpose, and then proceeded to the commercial manufacture of the battery at a special factory in Glen Ridge, New Jersey, installed for the purpose. There was no lack of buyers, but, on the contrary, the factory was unable to turn out batteries enough. The newspapers had previously published articles showing the unusual capacity and performance of the battery, and public interest had thus been greatly awakened.
The challenge of getting a good electrical connection in the positive part of the battery was actually Edison's main issue for many years. After extensive work and experimentation, he settled on a specific type of graphite that seemed ideal for the job and then moved forward with producing the battery at a special factory in Glen Ridge, New Jersey, set up for that purpose. There was no shortage of customers; in fact, the factory struggled to produce enough batteries. Newspapers had previously run articles highlighting the battery's remarkable capacity and performance, which significantly increased public interest.
Notwithstanding the establishment of a regular routine of manufacture and sale, Edison did not cease to experiment for improvement. Although the graphite apparently did the work desired of it, he was not altogether satisfied with its performance and made extended trials of other substances, but at that time found nothing that on the whole served the purpose better. Continuous tests of the commercial cells were carried on at the laboratory, as well as more practical and heavy tests in automobiles, which were constantly kept running around the adjoining country over all kinds of roads. All these tests were very closely watched by Edison, who demanded rigorously that the various trials of the battery should be carried on with all strenuousness so as to get the utmost results and develop any possible weakness. So insistent was he on this, that if any automobile should run several days without bursting a tire or breaking some part of the machine, he would accuse the chauffeur of picking out easy roads.
Even though he had set up a regular schedule for manufacturing and selling, Edison didn’t stop experimenting for improvements. While the graphite seemed to do its job, he wasn’t fully satisfied with its performance and conducted extensive tests on other materials, but at that time, he didn’t find anything that worked better overall. They were continuously testing the commercial cells in the lab, as well as running practical and heavy tests in cars, which were constantly driving around the surrounding area on all kinds of roads. Edison closely monitored all these tests, insisting that the various battery trials be conducted rigorously to achieve the best results and identify any potential weaknesses. He was so persistent about this that if any car managed to run for several days without getting a flat tire or breaking any part of the machine, he would accuse the driver of choosing easy routes.
After these tests had been going on for some time, and some thousands of cells had been sold and were giving satisfactory results to the purchasers, the test sheets and experience gathered from various sources pointed to the fact that occasionally a cell here and there would show up as being short in capacity. Inasmuch as the factory processes were very exact and carefully guarded, and every cell was made as uniform as human skill and care could provide, there thus arose a serious problem. Edison concentrated his powers on the investigation of this trouble, and found that the chief cause lay in the graphite. Some other minor matters also attracted his attention. What to do, was the important question that confronted him. To shut down the factory meant great loss and apparent failure. He realized this fully, but he also knew that to go on would simply be to increase the number of defective batteries in circulation, which would ultimately result in a permanent closure and real failure. Hence he took the course which one would expect of Edison's common sense and directness of action. He was not satisfied that the battery was a complete success, so he shut down and went to experimenting once more.
After these tests had been running for a while, and after thousands of cells had been sold with satisfactory results for the customers, the test sheets and information collected from different sources highlighted that occasionally a cell would appear to have reduced capacity. Since the manufacturing processes were very precise and closely monitored, and every cell was made as consistently as human skill and care could ensure, a serious problem emerged. Edison focused his efforts on investigating this issue and discovered that the main cause was the graphite. Some other minor issues also caught his attention. The critical question he faced was what to do. Shutting down the factory would lead to significant losses and seem like a failure. He fully understood this, but he also knew that continuing would just increase the number of faulty batteries in the market, which would eventually lead to a permanent shutdown and real failure. Therefore, he chose the sensible and straightforward course of action he was known for. He wasn’t convinced that the battery was a complete success, so he shut down and began experimenting again.
"And then," says one of the laboratory men, "we started on another series of record-breaking experiments that lasted over five years. I might almost say heart-breaking, too, for of all the elusive, disappointing things one ever hunted for that was the worst. But secrets have to be long-winded and roost high if they want to get away when the 'Old Man' goes hunting for them. He doesn't get mad when he misses them, but just keeps on smiling and firing, and usually brings them into camp. That's what he did on the battery, for after a whole lot of work he perfected the nickel-flake idea and process, besides making the great improvement of using tubes instead of flat pockets for the positive. He also added a minor improvement here and there, and now we have a finer battery than we ever expected."
"And then," says one of the lab guys, "we kicked off another round of record-breaking experiments that went on for over five years. I could almost say it was heartbreaking, too, because of all the elusive, disappointing things you ever chase, that was the worst. But secrets have to be complicated and stay hidden high up if they want to escape when the 'Old Man' goes after them. He doesn’t get upset when he misses; he just keeps smiling and shooting, and usually ends up bringing them back to camp. That’s what he did with the battery, because after a lot of work, he perfected the nickel-flake idea and process, plus he made the major upgrade of using tubes instead of flat pockets for the positive. He also made some minor improvements here and there, and now we have a better battery than we ever expected."
In the interim, while the experimentation of these last five years was in progress, many customers who had purchased batteries of the original type came knocking at the door with orders in their hands for additional outfits wherewith to equip more wagons and trucks. Edison expressed his regrets, but said he was not satisfied with the old cells and was engaged in improving them. To which the customers replied that THEY were entirely satisfied and ready and willing to pay for more batteries of the same kind; but Edison could not be moved from his determination, although considerable pressure was at times brought to bear to sway his decision.
In the meantime, while the experiments of the past five years were happening, many customers who had bought the original batteries were coming by with orders for more so they could equip additional wagons and trucks. Edison expressed his regrets but said he wasn't happy with the old models and was working on improving them. The customers responded that THEY were completely satisfied and were ready to pay for more batteries of the same kind; however, Edison remained firm in his decision, even though significant pressure was sometimes applied to change his mind.
Experiment was continued beyond the point of peradventure, and after some new machinery had been built, the manufacture of the new type of cell was begun in the early summer of 1909, and at the present writing is being extended as fast as the necessary additional machinery can be made. The product is shipped out as soon as it is completed.
The experiment continued without a doubt, and after some new equipment was built, the production of the new type of cell started in early summer 1909, and as of now, it's being expanded as quickly as the needed additional machinery can be manufactured. The product is shipped out as soon as it's finished.
The nickel flake, which is Edison's ingenious solution of the conductivity problem, is of itself a most interesting product, intensely practical in its application and fascinating in its manufacture. The flake of nickel is obtained by electroplating upon a metallic cylinder alternate layers of copper and nickel, one hundred of each, after which the combined sheet is stripped from the cylinder. So thin are the layers that this sheet is only about the thickness of a visiting-card, and yet it is composed of two hundred layers of metal. The sheet is cut into tiny squares, each about one-sixteenth of an inch, and these squares are put into a bath where the copper is dissolved out. This releases the layers of nickel, so that each of these small squares becomes one hundred tiny sheets, or flakes, of pure metallic nickel, so thin that when they are dried they will float in the air, like thistle-down.
The nickel flake, which is Edison's clever solution to the conductivity issue, is an incredibly interesting product, highly practical in its use and captivating in its production. The nickel flake is created by electroplating alternating layers of copper and nickel onto a metal cylinder, with a total of one hundred layers of each. After this, the combined sheet is removed from the cylinder. The layers are so thin that this sheet is only about as thick as a business card, yet it consists of two hundred layers of metal. The sheet is then cut into small squares, each about one-sixteenth of an inch, and these squares are placed in a bath that dissolves the copper. This process separates the layers of nickel, turning each small square into one hundred tiny sheets, or flakes, of pure metallic nickel, so thin that once dried, they will float in the air like dandelion seeds.
In their application to the manufacture of batteries, the flakes are used through the medium of a special machine, so arranged that small charges of nickel hydrate and nickel flake are alternately fed into the pockets intended for positives, and tamped down with a pressure equal to about four tons per square inch. This insures complete and perfect contact and consequent electrical conductivity throughout the entire unit.
In making batteries, the flakes are used via a special machine designed to alternately feed small amounts of nickel hydrate and nickel flake into the pockets for positives, which are then compacted with a pressure of about four tons per square inch. This guarantees complete and perfect contact, resulting in consistent electrical conductivity throughout the entire unit.
The development of the nickel flake contains in itself a history of patient investigation, labor, and achievement, but we have not space for it, nor for tracing the great work that has been done in developing and perfecting the numerous other parts and adjuncts of this remarkable battery. Suffice it to say that when Edison went boldly out into new territory, after something entirely unknown, he was quite prepared for hard work and exploration. He encountered both in unstinted measure, but kept on going forward until, after long travel, he had found all that he expected and accomplished something more beside. Nature DID respond to his whole-hearted appeal, and, by the time the hunt was ended, revealed a good storage battery of entirely new type. Edison not only recognized and took advantage of the principles he had discovered, but in adapting them for commercial use developed most ingenious processes and mechanical appliances for carrying his discoveries into practical effect. Indeed, it may be said that the invention of an enormous variety of new machines and mechanical appliances rendered necessary by each change during the various stages of development of the battery, from first to last, stands as a lasting tribute to the range and versatility of his powers.
The development of nickel flake has a history of careful research, hard work, and achievement, but we don't have the space to cover it or to outline the significant efforts made in enhancing and perfecting the many other components of this amazing battery. It's enough to say that when Edison boldly ventured into new territory in search of something completely unknown, he was fully prepared for hard work and exploration. He faced both in abundance, yet he continued pushing forward until, after a long journey, he found everything he expected and even accomplished more. Nature responded to his sincere request, and by the end of his search, revealed a brand-new type of effective storage battery. Edison not only recognized and utilized the principles he discovered but also created clever processes and mechanical tools to make his findings practical for commercial use. In fact, it can be said that the invention of a wide variety of new machines and mechanical tools necessary for each change throughout the various stages of the battery's development stands as a lasting tribute to the range and versatility of his abilities.
It is not within the scope of this narrative to enter into any description of the relative merits of the Edison storage battery, that being the province of a commercial catalogue. It does, however, seem entirely allowable to say that while at the present writing the tests that have been made extend over a few years only, their results and the intrinsic value of this characteristic Edison invention are of such a substantial nature as to point to the inevitable growth of another great industry arising from its manufacture, and to its wide-spread application to many uses.
This narrative doesn't aim to describe the advantages of the Edison storage battery, as that falls under the domain of a commercial catalog. However, it's reasonable to mention that, although the tests conducted so far cover only a few years, their results and the inherent value of this significant Edison invention are substantial enough to indicate the unavoidable emergence of another major industry from its production and its broad applications in various fields.
The principal use that Edison has had in mind for his battery is transportation of freight and passengers by truck, automobile, and street-car. The greatly increased capacity in proportion to weight of the Edison cell makes it particularly adaptable for this class of work on account of the much greater radius of travel that is possible by its use. The latter point of advantage is the one that appeals most to the automobilist, as he is thus enabled to travel, it is asserted, more than three times farther than ever before on a single charge of the battery.
The main purpose Edison envisioned for his battery is the transportation of goods and people using trucks, cars, and streetcars. The significantly higher capacity relative to weight of the Edison cell makes it especially suitable for this type of work since it allows for a much greater travel range. This benefit is particularly appealing to drivers, as it is claimed they can travel more than three times farther than before on a single battery charge.
Edison believes that there are important advantages possible in the employment of his storage battery for street-car propulsion. Under the present system of operation, a plant furnishing the electric power for street railways must be large enough to supply current for the maximum load during "rush hours," although much of the machinery may be lying idle and unproductive in the hours of minimum load. By the use of storage-battery cars, this immense and uneconomical maximum investment in plant can be cut down to proportions of true commercial economy, as the charging of the batteries can be conducted at a uniform rate with a reasonable expenditure for generating machinery. Not only this, but each car becomes an independently moving unit, not subject to delay by reason of a general breakdown of the power plant or of the line. In addition to these advantages, the streets would be freed from their burden of trolley wires or conduits. To put his ideas into practice, Edison built a short railway line at the Orange works in the winter of 1909-10, and, in co-operation with Mr. R. H. Beach, constructed a special type of street-car, and equipped it with motor, storage battery, and other necessary operating devices. This car was subsequently put upon the street-car lines in New York City, and demonstrated its efficiency so completely that it was purchased by one of the street-car companies, which has since ordered additional cars for its lines. The demonstration of this initial car has been watched with interest by many railroad officials, and its performance has been of so successful a nature that at the present writing (the summer of 1910) it has been necessary to organize and equip a preliminary factory in which to construct many other cars of a similar type that have been ordered by other street-railway companies. This enterprise will be conducted by a corporation which has been specially organized for the purpose. Thus, there has been initiated the development of a new and important industry whose possible ultimate proportions are beyond the range of present calculation. Extensive as this industry may become, however, Edison is firmly convinced that the greatest field for his storage battery lies in its adaptation to commercial trucking and hauling, and to pleasure vehicles, in comparison with which the street-car business even with its great possibilities—will not amount to more than 1 per cent.
Edison believes that there are significant benefits to using his storage battery for streetcar propulsion. Currently, a facility providing the electric power for street railways has to be large enough to meet the maximum demand during peak hours, even though much of the equipment may be unused during off-peak times. With storage-battery cars, this massive and inefficient investment in infrastructure can be reduced to a level of true commercial viability, as battery charging can happen at a steady rate with a reasonable cost for generating equipment. Furthermore, each car functions as an independent unit, free from delays caused by a general power plant failure or line issues. Additionally, the streets would no longer need to accommodate trolley wires or tracks. To implement his ideas, Edison built a short railway line at the Orange works during the winter of 1909-10 and, in collaboration with Mr. R. H. Beach, created a special type of streetcar equipped with a motor, storage battery, and all necessary operational components. This car was later used on streetcar lines in New York City and demonstrated its efficiency so effectively that it was purchased by one of the streetcar companies, which has since ordered more cars for its routes. The demonstration of this initial car has caught the attention of many railway officials, and its successful performance has led to the need for a preliminary factory to produce additional cars of a similar type that have been ordered by other street railway companies. This venture will be run by a corporation specifically formed for this purpose. Thus, a new and significant industry has been initiated, with potential growth that is hard to predict. Despite the potential expansion of this industry, Edison strongly believes that the largest market for his storage battery will be in commercial trucking and hauling, as well as in recreational vehicles, with the streetcar business—even considering its great prospects—amounting to no more than 1 percent.
Edison has pithily summed up his work and his views in an article on "The To-Morrows of Electricity and Invention" in Popular Electricity for June, 1910, in which he says: "For years past I have been trying to perfect a storage battery, and have now rendered it entirely suitable to automobile and other work. There is absolutely no reason why horses should be allowed within city limits; for between the gasoline and the electric car, no room is left for them. They are not needed. The cow and the pig have gone, and the horse is still more undesirable. A higher public ideal of health and cleanliness is working toward such banishment very swiftly; and then we shall have decent streets, instead of stables made out of strips of cobblestones bordered by sidewalks. The worst use of money is to make a fine thoroughfare, and then turn it over to horses. Besides that, the change will put the humane societies out of business. Many people now charge their own batteries because of lack of facilities; but I believe central stations will find in this work very soon the largest part of their load. The New York Edison Company, or the Chicago Edison Company, should have as much current going out for storage batteries as for power motors; and it will be so some near day."
Edison has succinctly summed up his work and views in an article on "The Tomorrows of Electricity and Invention" in Popular Electricity for June, 1910, where he states: "For years, I've been trying to perfect a storage battery, and I've now made it fully suitable for cars and other applications. There’s absolutely no reason for horses to be allowed in city limits; between gas and electric cars, there's no space for them. They’re unnecessary. Cows and pigs are gone, and horses are even more undesirable. A greater public focus on health and cleanliness is swiftly moving toward their removal; then we’ll have decent streets instead of stables made from cobblestones bordered by sidewalks. The worst use of money is to create a nice road and then give it to horses. Additionally, this change will put humane societies out of business. Many people currently charge their own batteries due to a lack of facilities, but I believe central stations will soon find this work making up a large part of their demand. The New York Edison Company or the Chicago Edison Company should have as much electricity going out for storage batteries as for power motors; and that day will come soon."
CHAPTER XXIII
MISCELLANEOUS INVENTIONS
IT has been the endeavor in this narrative to group Edison's inventions and patents so that his work in the different fields can be studied independently and separately. The history of his career has therefore fallen naturally into a series of chapters, each aiming to describe some particular development or art; and, in a way, the plan has been helpful to the writers while probably useful to the readers. It happens, however, that the process has left a vast mass of discovery and invention wholly untouched, and relegates to a concluding brief chapter some of the most interesting episodes of a fruitful life. Any one who will turn to the list of Edison patents at the end of the book will find a large number of things of which not even casual mention has been made, but which at the time occupied no small amount of the inventor's time and attention, and many of which are now part and parcel of modern civilization. Edison has, indeed, touched nothing that he did not in some way improve. As Thoreau said: "The laws of the Universe are not indifferent, but are forever on the side of the most sensitive," and there never was any one more sensitive to the defects of every art and appliance, nor any one more active in applying the law of evolution. It is perhaps this many-sidedness of Edison that has impressed the multitude, and that in the "popular vote" taken a couple of years ago by the New York Herald placed his name at the head of the list of ten greatest living Americans. It is curious and pertinent to note that a similar plebiscite taken by a technical journal among its expert readers had exactly the same result. Evidently the public does not agree with the opinion expressed by the eccentric artist Blake in his "Marriage of Heaven and Hell," when he said: "Improvement makes strange roads; but the crooked roads without improvements are roads of Genius."
This narrative aims to organize Edison's inventions and patents so that his work in various fields can be studied independently. The history of his career naturally divides into a series of chapters, each designed to describe a specific development or area of expertise; this approach has been helpful for the writers and likely beneficial to the readers. However, this method has resulted in a vast amount of discovery and invention being overlooked, relegating some of the most interesting episodes of a fruitful life to a brief concluding chapter. Anyone who looks at the list of Edison patents at the end of the book will find many items that haven't even been casually mentioned, yet they occupied a significant amount of the inventor's time and attention, many of which are now integral to modern civilization. Indeed, Edison improved everything he touched. As Thoreau said, "The laws of the Universe are not indifferent, but are always on the side of the most sensitive," and no one was more attuned to the shortcomings of every art and tool, nor more active in applying the law of evolution. Perhaps it is this versatility of Edison that has impressed the public, leading to his name being placed at the top of a list of the ten greatest living Americans in a “popular vote” conducted by the New York Herald a few years ago. It’s interesting and relevant to note that a similar survey taken by a technical journal among its expert readers yielded the same result. Clearly, the public does not share the opinion expressed by the eccentric artist Blake in his "Marriage of Heaven and Hell," when he said, "Improvement makes strange roads; but the crooked roads without improvements are roads of Genius."
The product of Edison's brain may be divided into three classes. The first embraces such arts and industries, or such apparatus, as have already been treated. The second includes devices like the tasimeter, phonomotor, odoroscope, etc., and others now to be noted. The third embraces a number of projected inventions, partially completed investigations, inventions in use but not patented, and a great many caveats filed in the Patent Office at various times during the last forty years for the purpose of protecting his ideas pending their contemplated realization in practice. These caveats served their purpose thoroughly in many instances, but there have remained a great variety of projects upon which no definite action was ever taken. One ought to add the contents of an unfinished piece of extraordinary fiction based wholly on new inventions and devices utterly unknown to mankind. Some day the novel may be finished, but Edison has no inclination to go back to it, and says he cannot understand how any man is able to make a speech or write a book, for he simply can't do it.
Edison's creations can be grouped into three categories. The first includes the arts, industries, or equipment we've already discussed. The second consists of devices like the tasimeter, phonomotor, odoroscope, and others that will be mentioned. The third category encompasses a variety of planned inventions, partially finished research, inventions currently in use but not patented, and numerous caveats filed at the Patent Office over the past forty years to protect his ideas while they were being developed. These caveats often served their purpose well, yet there are still many projects that never moved beyond the planning stage. Additionally, there's an unfinished piece of extraordinary fiction based entirely on new inventions and devices unknown to humanity. One day, the novel might be completed, but Edison shows no interest in returning to it, stating that he cannot fathom how anyone can give a speech or write a book, as he simply doesn't have that ability.
After what has been said in previous chapters, it will not seem so strange that Edison should have hundreds of dormant inventions on his hands. There are human limitations even for such a tireless worker as he is. While the preparation of data for this chapter was going on, one of the writers in discussing with him the vast array of unexploited things said: "Don't you feel a sense of regret in being obliged to leave so many things uncompleted?" To which he replied: "What's the use? One lifetime is too short, and I am busy every day improving essential parts of my established industries." It must suffice to speak briefly of a few leading inventions that have been worked out, and to dismiss with scant mention all the rest, taking just a few items, as typical and suggestive, especially when Edison can himself be quoted as to them. Incidentally it may be noted that things, not words, are referred to; for Edison, in addition to inventing the apparatus, has often had to coin the word to describe it. A large number of the words and phrases in modern electrical parlance owe their origin to him. Even the "call-word" of the telephone, "Hello!" sent tingling over the wire a few million times daily was taken from Menlo Park by men installing telephones in different parts of the world, men who had just learned it at the laboratory, and thus made it a universal sesame for telephonic conversation.
After what we’ve discussed in previous chapters, it won’t seem so surprising that Edison has hundreds of unused inventions on his hands. There are human limitations even for someone as tireless as he is. While preparing the data for this chapter, one of the writers asked him during a discussion about the vast number of unutilized ideas: "Don’t you feel any regret about leaving so many things unfinished?" He responded, "What’s the point? One lifetime is too short, and I’m busy every day improving key parts of my established industries." It’s enough to briefly mention a few major inventions that have been developed, while dismissing the rest with only a quick mention, highlighting just a few examples that are typical and suggestive, especially since Edison can be quoted regarding them. It’s worth noting that we're talking about things, not words; Edison, in addition to inventing the devices, often had to create the terminology to describe them. A significant number of words and phrases in modern electrical language originated from him. Even the "call word" of the telephone, "Hello!" which is transmitted millions of times daily, was picked up from Menlo Park by people installing telephones in various parts of the world, who had just learned it at the lab, thus making it a universal term for phone conversations.
It is hard to determine where to begin with Edison's miscellaneous inventions, but perhaps telegraphy has the "right of line," and Edison's work in that field puts him abreast of the latest wireless developments that fill the world with wonder. "I perfected a system of train telegraphy between stations and trains in motion whereby messages could be sent from the moving train to the central office; and this was the forerunner of wireless telegraphy. This system was used for a number of years on the Lehigh Valley Railroad on their construction trains. The electric wave passed from a piece of metal on top of the car across the air to the telegraph wires; and then proceeded to the despatcher's office. In my first experiments with this system I tried it on the Staten Island Railroad, and employed an operator named King to do the experimenting. He reported results every day, and received instructions by mail; but for some reason he could send messages all right when the train went in one direction, but could not make it go in the contrary direction. I made suggestions of every kind to get around this phenomenon. Finally I telegraphed King to find out if he had any suggestions himself; and I received a reply that the only way he could propose to get around the difficulty was to put the island on a pivot so it could be turned around! I found the trouble finally, and the practical introduction on the Lehigh Valley road was the result. The system was sold to a very wealthy man, and he would never sell any rights or answer letters. He became a spiritualist subsequently, which probably explains it." It is interesting to note that Edison became greatly interested in the later developments by Marconi, and is an admiring friend and adviser of that well-known inventor.
It's tough to know where to start with Edison's various inventions, but maybe telegraphy deserves the spotlight, as his work in that area aligns him with the latest wireless innovations that amaze the world. "I developed a system of train telegraphy between stations and moving trains that allowed messages to be sent from a moving train to the central office; this was the precursor to wireless telegraphy. This system was used for several years on the Lehigh Valley Railroad with their construction trains. The electric wave transferred from a piece of metal on top of the car through the air to the telegraph lines, then to the dispatcher’s office. In my initial experiments with this system, I tested it on the Staten Island Railroad and hired an operator named King to conduct the tests. He reported results every day and received instructions by mail; however, for some reason, he could send messages just fine when the train was moving in one direction but couldn’t do the same in the opposite direction. I suggested every possible solution to get around this issue. Eventually, I messaged King to see if he had any ideas himself, and he replied that the only way he could think of solving the problem was to put the island on a pivot so it could be turned around! I eventually identified the problem, and the successful implementation on the Lehigh Valley Railroad came from that. The system was sold to a very wealthy individual who refused to sell any rights or respond to letters. He later became a spiritualist, which probably explains his behavior." It's noteworthy that Edison became very interested in Marconi's later advancements and is a supportive friend and advisor to that famous inventor.
The earlier experiments with wireless telegraphy at Menlo Park were made at a time when Edison was greatly occupied with his electric-light interests, and it was not until the beginning of 1886 that he was able to spare the time to make a public demonstration of the system as applied to moving trains. Ezra T. Gilliland, of Boston, had become associated with him in his experiments, and they took out several joint patents subsequently. The first practical use of the system took place on a thirteen-mile stretch of the Staten Island Railroad with the results mentioned by Edison above.
The earlier experiments with wireless telegraphy at Menlo Park happened when Edison was focused on his electric light projects, and it wasn’t until early 1886 that he finally had time to publicly demonstrate the system on moving trains. Ezra T. Gilliland from Boston had teamed up with him for these experiments, and together they filed several joint patents afterward. The first practical application of the system occurred over a thirteen-mile stretch of the Staten Island Railroad, resulting in the outcomes Edison mentioned earlier.
A little later, Edison and Gilliland joined forces with Lucius J. Phelps, another investigator, who had been experimenting along the same lines and had taken out several patents. The various interests were combined in a corporation under whose auspices the system was installed on the Lehigh Valley Railroad, where it was used for several years. The official demonstration trip on this road took place on October 6, 1887, on a six-car train running to Easton, Pennsylvania, a distance of fifty-four miles. A great many telegrams were sent and received while the train was at full speed, including a despatch to the "cable king," John Pender. London, England, and a reply from him. [17]
A little later, Edison and Gilliland teamed up with Lucius J. Phelps, another researcher who had been working on similar projects and had secured several patents. Their combined interests formed a corporation that oversaw the installation of the system on the Lehigh Valley Railroad, where it operated for several years. The official demonstration run on this line occurred on October 6, 1887, on a six-car train traveling to Easton, Pennsylvania, covering a distance of fifty-four miles. Many telegrams were sent and received while the train was at full speed, including a message to the "cable king," John Pender, in London, England, and a response from him. [17]
[Footnote 17: Broadly described in outline, the system consisted of an induction circuit obtained by laying strips of tin along the top or roof of a railway car, and the installation of a special telegraph line running parallel with the track and strung on poles of only medium height. The train and also each signalling station were equipped with regulation telegraphic apparatus, such as battery, key, relay, and sounder, together with induction-coil and condenser. In addition, there was a transmitting device in the shape of a musical reed, or buzzer. In practice, this buzzer was continuously operated at high speed by a battery. Its vibrations were broken by means of a key into long and short periods, representing Morse characters, which were transmitted inductively from the train circuit to the pole line, or vice versa, and received by the operator at the other end through a high-resistance telephone receiver inserted in the secondary circuit of the induction-coil.]
[Footnote 17: In simple terms, the system included an induction circuit created by placing strips of tin along the roof of a railway car, along with a dedicated telegraph line running parallel to the track and supported by mid-height poles. Both the train and each signaling station had standard telegraph equipment, such as a battery, key, relay, and sounder, along with an induction coil and condenser. Additionally, there was a transmitting device shaped like a musical reed or buzzer. In practice, this buzzer was continuously powered at high speed by a battery. Its vibrations were interrupted by a key into long and short bursts representing Morse code, which were transmitted inductively from the train circuit to the pole line or vice versa, and received by the operator at the other end through a high-resistance telephone receiver connected in the secondary circuit of the induction coil.]
Although the space between the cars and the pole line was probably not more than about fifty feet, it is interesting to note that in Edison's early experiments at Menlo Park he succeeded in transmitting messages through the air at a distance of 580 feet. Speaking of this and of his other experiments with induction telegraphy by means of kites, communicating from one to the other and thus from the kites to instruments on the earth, Edison said recently: "We only transmitted about two and one-half miles through the kites. What has always puzzled me since is that I did not think of using the results of my experiments on 'etheric force' that I made in 1875. I have never been able to understand how I came to overlook them. If I had made use of my own work I should have had long-distance wireless telegraphy."
Although the space between the cars and the pole line was probably no more than about fifty feet, it's interesting to note that in Edison's early experiments at Menlo Park, he managed to transmit messages through the air over a distance of 580 feet. Talking about this and his other experiments with induction telegraphy using kites—communicating from one to the other and then from the kites to instruments on the ground—Edison said recently: "We only transmitted about two and a half miles through the kites. What has always puzzled me since is that I didn't think of using the results of my experiments on 'etheric force' that I did in 1875. I've never been able to understand how I overlooked them. If I had used my own work, I would have had long-distance wireless telegraphy."
In one of the appendices to this book is given a brief technical account of Edison's investigations of the phenomena which lie at the root of modern wireless or "space" telegraphy, and the attention of the reader is directed particularly to the description and quotations there from the famous note-books of Edison's experiments in regard to what he called "etheric force." It will be seen that as early as 1875 Edison detected and studied certain phenomena—i.e., the production of electrical effects in non-closed circuits, which for a time made him think he was on the trail of a new force, as there was no plausible explanation for them by the then known laws of electricity and magnetism. Later came the magnificent work of Hertz identifying the phenomena as "electromagnetic waves" in the ether, and developing a new world of theory and science based upon them and their production by disruptive discharges.
In one of the appendices of this book, there's a brief technical overview of Edison's investigations into the phenomena that form the basis of modern wireless or "space" telegraphy. The reader's attention is especially drawn to the descriptions and excerpts from Edison's famous notebooks about his experiments concerning what he referred to as "etheric force." It will be noted that as early as 1875, Edison observed and studied certain phenomena—specifically, the generation of electrical effects in open circuits—which at the time led him to believe he was on the verge of discovering a new force, as there was no convincing explanation for these effects based on the known laws of electricity and magnetism. Later, Hertz conducted groundbreaking work that identified these phenomena as "electromagnetic waves" in the ether, creating a new realm of theory and science based on them and their generation through disruptive discharges.
Edison's assertions were treated with scepticism by the scientific world, which was not then ready for the discovery and not sufficiently furnished with corroborative data. It is singular, to say the least, to note how Edison's experiments paralleled and proved in advance those that came later; and even his apparatus such as the "dark box" for making the tiny sparks visible (as the waves impinged on the receiver) bears close analogy with similar apparatus employed by Hertz. Indeed, as Edison sent the dark-box apparatus to the Paris Exposition in 1881, and let Batchelor repeat there the puzzling experiments, it seems by no means unlikely that, either directly or on the report of some friend, Hertz may thus have received from Edison a most valuable suggestion, the inventor aiding the physicist in opening up a wonderful new realm. In this connection, indeed, it is very interesting to quote two great authorities. In May, 1889, at a meeting of the Institution of Electrical Engineers in London, Dr. (now Sir) Oliver Lodge remarked in a discussion on a paper of his own on lightning conductors, embracing the Hertzian waves in its treatment: "Many of the effects I have shown—sparks in unsuspected places and other things—have been observed before. Henry observed things of the kind and Edison noticed some curious phenomena, and said it was not electricity but 'etheric force' that caused these sparks; and the matter was rather pooh-poohed. It was a small part of THIS VERY THING; only the time was not ripe; theoretical knowledge was not ready for it." Again in his "Signalling without Wires," in giving the history of the coherer principle, Lodge remarks: "Sparks identical in all respects with those discovered by Hertz had been seen in recent times both by Edison and by Sylvanus Thompson, being styled 'etheric force' by the former; but their theoretic significance had not been perceived, and they were somewhat sceptically regarded." During the same discussion in London, in 1889, Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), after citing some experiments by Faraday with his insulated cage at the Royal Institution, said: "His (Faraday's) attention was not directed to look for Hertz sparks, or probably he might have found them in the interior. Edison seems to have noticed something of the kind in what he called 'etheric force.' His name 'etheric' may thirteen years ago have seemed to many people absurd. But now we are all beginning to call these inductive phenomena 'etheric.'" With which testimony from the great Kelvin as to his priority in determining the vital fact, and with the evidence that as early as 1875 he built apparatus that demonstrated the fact, Edison is probably quite content.
Edison's claims were met with skepticism by the scientific community, which was not prepared for the discovery and lacked sufficient supporting evidence. It's quite striking to see how Edison's experiments anticipated and validated later work; even his device, known as the "dark box," used to make tiny sparks visible as the waves hit the receiver, is very similar to equipment used by Hertz. In fact, when Edison sent the dark-box device to the Paris Exposition in 1881 and allowed Batchelor to conduct those intriguing experiments there, it’s highly possible that Hertz either received valuable ideas directly from Edison or through a friend’s report, helping the physicist explore a fantastic new field. In this context, it's particularly interesting to quote two prominent authorities. In May 1889, at a meeting of the Institution of Electrical Engineers in London, Dr. (now Sir) Oliver Lodge commented during a discussion on his own paper about lightning conductors that included Hertzian waves: "Many of the effects I've demonstrated—sparks in unexpected places and others—have been observed before. Henry noted similar things, and Edison pointed out some strange phenomena, stating that it wasn’t electricity but 'etheric force' that caused these sparks; and the idea was largely dismissed. It was a small part of THIS VERY THING; it’s just that the time wasn’t right; theoretical knowledge wasn’t prepared for it." Again, in his work "Signalling without Wires," while detailing the history of the coherer principle, Lodge noted: "Sparks exactly like those discovered by Hertz had been observed recently by both Edison and Sylvanus Thompson, who referred to them as 'etheric force'; but their theoretical importance hadn’t been recognized, and they were viewed with a degree of skepticism." During the same discussion in London in 1889, Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), after mentioning some experiments by Faraday with his insulated cage at the Royal Institution, said: "Faraday wasn’t looking for Hertz sparks, or he probably would have found them inside. Edison seems to have noticed something similar in what he termed 'etheric force.' His title 'etheric' may have seemed ridiculous to many people thirteen years ago. But now we’re all starting to refer to these inductive phenomena as 'etheric.'" With such testimony from the esteemed Kelvin regarding his earlier recognition of this crucial fact, along with the evidence that as early as 1875 Edison constructed equipment demonstrating it, he is likely quite satisfied.
It should perhaps be noted at this point that a curious effect observed at the laboratory was shown in connection with Edison lamps at the Philadelphia Exhibition of 1884. It became known in scientific parlance as the "Edison effect," showing a curious current condition or discharge in the vacuum of the bulb. It has since been employed by Fleming in England and De Forest in this country, and others, as the basis for wireless-telegraph apparatus. It is in reality a minute rectifier of alternating current, and analogous to those which have since been made on a large scale.
It should be noted here that a strange effect observed in the lab was connected to Edison lamps at the Philadelphia Exhibition of 1884. This phenomenon became known in scientific terms as the "Edison effect," indicating an unusual current condition or discharge in the bulb's vacuum. It has since been used by Fleming in England, De Forest in the United States, and others as the foundation for wireless telegraph devices. Essentially, it's a tiny rectifier of alternating current and similar to those that have since been produced on a larger scale.
When Roentgen came forward with his discovery of the new "X"-ray in 1895, Edison was ready for it, and took up experimentation with it on a large scale; some of his work being recorded in an article in the Century Magazine of May, 1896, where a great deal of data may be found. Edison says with regard to this work: "When the X-ray came up, I made the first fluoroscope, using tungstate of calcium. I also found that this tungstate could be put into a vacuum chamber of glass and fused to the inner walls of the chamber; and if the X-ray electrodes were let into the glass chamber and a proper vacuum was attained, you could get a fluorescent lamp of several candle-power. I started in to make a number of these lamps, but I soon found that the X-ray had affected poisonously my assistant, Mr. Dally, so that his hair came out and his flesh commenced to ulcerate. I then concluded it would not do, and that it would not be a very popular kind of light; so I dropped it.
When Roentgen introduced his discovery of the new "X"-ray in 1895, Edison was ready for it and began large-scale experiments. Some of his findings were published in an article in Century Magazine in May 1896, where a lot of information can be found. Edison noted about this work: "When the X-ray came about, I created the first fluoroscope using tungstate of calcium. I also discovered that this tungstate could be placed in a glass vacuum chamber and fused to the inner walls of the chamber; and if the X-ray electrodes were inserted into the glass chamber and a proper vacuum was achieved, you could produce a fluorescent lamp with several candle-power. I started making several of these lamps, but I quickly realized that the X-ray had harmed my assistant, Mr. Dally, causing his hair to fall out and his skin to begin ulcerating. I then decided it wasn't safe and that it wouldn’t be a very popular kind of light, so I abandoned it."
"At the time I selected tungstate of calcium because it was so fluorescent, I set four men to making all kinds of chemical combinations, and thus collected upward of 8000 different crystals of various chemical combinations, discovering several hundred different substances which would fluoresce to the X-ray. So far little had come of X-ray work, but it added another letter to the scientific alphabet. I don't know any thing about radium, and I have lots of company." The Electrical Engineer of June 3, 1896, contains a photograph of Mr. Edison taken by the light of one of his fluorescent lamps. The same journal in its issue of April 1, 1896, shows an Edison fluoroscope in use by an observer, in the now familiar and universal form somewhat like a stereoscope. This apparatus as invented by Edison consists of a flaring box, curved at one end to fit closely over the forehead and eyes, while the other end of the box is closed by a paste-board cover. On the inside of this is spread a layer of tungstate of calcium. By placing the object to be observed, such as the hand, between the vacuum-tube and the fluorescent screen, the "shadow" is formed on the screen and can be observed at leisure. The apparatus has proved invaluable in surgery and has become an accepted part of the equipment of modern surgery. In 1896, at the Electrical Exhibition in the Grand Central Palace, New York City, given under the auspices of the National Electric Light Association, thousands and thousands of persons with the use of this apparatus in Edison's personal exhibit were enabled to see their own bones; and the resultant public sensation was great. Mr. Mallory tells a characteristic story of Edison's own share in the memorable exhibit: "The exhibit was announced for opening on Monday. On the preceding Friday all the apparatus, which included a large induction-coil, was shipped from Orange to New York, and on Saturday afternoon Edison, accompanied by Fred Ott, one of his assistants, and myself, went over to install it so as to have it ready for Monday morning. Had everything been normal, a few hours would have sufficed for completion of the work, but on coming to test the big coil, it was found to be absolutely out of commission, having been so seriously injured as to necessitate its entire rewinding. It being summer-time, all the machine shops were closed until Monday morning, and there were several miles of wire to be wound on the coil. Edison would not consider a postponement of the exhibition, so there was nothing to do but go to work and wind it by hand. We managed to find a lathe, but there was no power; so each of us, including Edison, took turns revolving the lathe by pulling on the belt, while the other two attended to the winding of the wire. We worked continuously all through that Saturday night and all day Sunday until evening, when we finished the job. I don't remember ever being conscious of more muscles in my life. I guess Edison was tired also, but he took it very philosophically." This was apparently the first public demonstration of the X-ray to the American public.
"At the time, I chose calcium tungstate because it was so fluorescent. I had four men create all sorts of chemical combinations, and we ended up collecting over 8,000 different crystals of various chemical mixtures, discovering several hundred different substances that would fluoresce to X-rays. Until then, not much had come from X-ray work, but it added another letter to the scientific alphabet. I don’t know anything about radium, and plenty of others feel the same." The Electrical Engineer from June 3, 1896, features a photograph of Mr. Edison taken by the light of one of his fluorescent lamps. The same magazine, in its April 1, 1896 issue, shows an Edison fluoroscope being used by an observer, in the now familiar and universally recognized form similar to a stereoscope. This device, invented by Edison, consists of a flared box, curved at one end to fit closely over the forehead and eyes, while the other end of the box is sealed with a paste-board cover. Inside, there’s a layer of calcium tungstate. By placing the object to be viewed, like a hand, between the vacuum tube and the fluorescent screen, a "shadow" is created on the screen that can be observed at leisure. The apparatus has proven invaluable in surgery and has become a standard part of modern surgical equipment. In 1896, at the Electrical Exhibition in the Grand Central Palace, New York City, organized by the National Electric Light Association, thousands of people were able to see their own bones using this equipment in Edison’s personal exhibit, causing a significant public sensation. Mr. Mallory shares a typical story about Edison’s involvement in that memorable exhibit: "The exhibit was scheduled to open on Monday. On the Friday before, all the equipment, including a large induction coil, was shipped from Orange to New York. On Saturday afternoon, Edison, along with Fred Ott, one of his assistants, and I, went to set it up to be ready for Monday morning. If everything had gone smoothly, a few hours would have been enough to complete it, but when we tested the big coil, we discovered it was completely out of order, having been so damaged that it needed to be entirely rewound. Since it was summer, all the machine shops were closed until Monday morning, and there were several miles of wire that needed to be wound onto the coil. Edison wouldn’t consider postponing the exhibition, so we had no choice but to do it by hand. We managed to find a lathe, but there was no power, so each of us, including Edison, took turns turning the lathe by pulling on the belt while the other two wound the wire. We worked continuously all that Saturday night and all day Sunday until evening, when we finally finished the job. I don’t remember ever being aware of using more muscles in my life. I suppose Edison was tired too, but he took it all in stride." This was likely the first public demonstration of the X-ray to the American public.
Edison's ore-separation work has been already fully described, but the story would hardly be complete without a reference to similar work in gold extraction, dating back to the Menlo Park days: "I got up a method," says Edison, "of separating placer gold by a dry process, in which I could work economically ore as lean as five cents of gold to the cubic yard. I had several car-loads of different placer sands sent to me and proved I could do it. Some parties hearing I had succeeded in doing such a thing went to work and got hold of what was known as the Ortiz mine grant, twelve miles from Santa Fe, New Mexico. This mine, according to the reports of several mining engineers made in the last forty years, was considered one of the richest placer deposits in the United States, and various schemes had been put forward to bring water from the mountains forty miles away to work those immense beds. The reports stated that the Mexicans had been panning gold for a hundred years out of these deposits.
Edison's work on separating ore has been thoroughly covered, but the story wouldn't be complete without mentioning similar work in gold extraction from the Menlo Park days: "I developed a method," Edison says, "for separating placer gold using a dry process, which allowed me to economically process ore as lean as five cents worth of gold per cubic yard. I had several carloads of different placer sands sent to me and proved I could do it. Some people, hearing that I had succeeded, went to work and acquired what was known as the Ortiz mine grant, twelve miles from Santa Fe, New Mexico. This mine, according to reports from several mining engineers over the last forty years, was regarded as one of the richest placer deposits in the United States, and various plans had been proposed to bring water from the mountains forty miles away to exploit those vast deposits. The reports indicated that Mexicans had been panning for gold from these deposits for a hundred years.
"These parties now made arrangements with the stockholders or owners of the grant, and with me, to work the deposits by my process. As I had had some previous experience with the statements of mining men, I concluded I would just send down a small plant and prospect the field before putting up a large one. This I did, and I sent two of my assistants, whom I could trust, down to this place to erect the plant; and started to sink shafts fifty feet deep all over the area. We soon learned that the rich gravel, instead of being spread over an area of three by seven miles, and rich from the grass roots down, was spread over a space of about twenty-five acres, and that even this did not average more than ten cents to the cubic yard. The whole placer would not give more than one and one-quarter cents per cubic yard. As my business arrangements had not been very perfectly made, I lost the usual amount."
"These parties made deals with the stockholders or owners of the grant, as well as with me, to extract the deposits using my process. Since I had some experience with the statements from mining guys, I decided to first send down a small plant to explore the area before investing in a larger operation. So, I did that and sent two of my trustworthy assistants to set up the plant and start digging shafts fifty feet deep across the area. We quickly found out that the rich gravel wasn’t spread across an area of three by seven miles and rich from the grass roots down; it was actually confined to about twenty-five acres, and even that didn’t average more than ten cents per cubic yard. The entire placer would yield no more than one and a quarter cents per cubic yard. Since my business arrangements weren’t very well set up, I ended up losing the usual amount."
Going to another extreme, we find Edison grappling with one of the biggest problems known to the authorities of New York—the disposal of its heavy snows. It is needless to say that witnessing the ordinary slow and costly procedure would put Edison on his mettle. "One time when they had a snow blockade in New York I started to build a machine with Batchelor—a big truck with a steam-engine and compressor on it. We would run along the street, gather all the snow up in front of us, pass it into the compressor, and deliver little blocks of ice behind us in the gutter, taking one-tenth the room of the snow, and not inconveniencing anybody. We could thus take care of a snow-storm by diminishing the bulk of material to be handled. The preliminary experiment we made was dropped because we went into other things. The machine would go as fast as a horse could walk."
Going to another extreme, we find Edison dealing with one of the biggest challenges faced by the authorities in New York—the disposal of its heavy snowfall. It's obvious that seeing the usual slow and expensive process would motivate Edison. "One time when there was a snow blockade in New York, I started to build a machine with Batchelor—a big truck with a steam engine and compressor on it. We would drive down the street, collect all the snow in front of us, push it into the compressor, and release small blocks of ice behind us into the gutter, taking up one-tenth the space of the snow and not bothering anyone. This way, we could handle a snowstorm by reducing the amount of material to manage. We dropped the initial experiment because we got involved in other projects. The machine would move as fast as a horse could walk."
Edison has always taken a keen interest in aerial flight, and has also experimented with aeroplanes, his preference inclining to the helicopter type, as noted in the newspapers and periodicals from time to time. The following statement from him refers to a type of aeroplane of great novelty and ingenuity: "James Gordon Bennett came to me and asked that I try some primary experiments to see if aerial navigation was feasible with 'heavier-than-air' machines. I got up a motor and put it on the scales and tried a large number of different things and contrivances connected to the motor, to see how it would lighten itself on the scales. I got some data and made up my mind that what was needed was a very powerful engine for its weight, in small compass. So I conceived of an engine employing guncotton. I took a lot of ticker paper tape, turned it into guncotton and got up an engine with an arrangement whereby I could feed this gun-cotton strip into the cylinder and explode it inside electrically. The feed took place between two copper rolls. The copper kept the temperature down, so that it could only explode up to the point where it was in contact with the feed rolls. It worked pretty well; but once the feed roll didn't save it, and the flame went through and exploded the whole roll and kicked up such a bad explosion I abandoned it. But the idea might be made to work."
Edison has always been really interested in flying and has also experimented with airplanes, preferring helicopters, as has been noted in various newspapers and magazines over time. The following statement from him discusses a very innovative type of airplane: "James Gordon Bennett came to me and asked if I could run some initial experiments to see if aerial navigation was possible with 'heavier-than-air' machines. I set up a motor, weighed it, and tried a bunch of different things attached to the motor to see how I could reduce its weight. I gathered some data and realized that what was needed was a very powerful engine that was compact for its weight. So, I came up with an engine using guncotton. I took a lot of ticker tape, turned it into guncotton, and built an engine where I could feed this guncotton strip into the cylinder and explode it electrically. The feeding happened between two copper rolls. The copper kept the temperature down, so it could only explode at the point where it touched the feed rolls. It worked pretty well, but at one point the feed roll failed to save it, causing a huge explosion that made me abandon it. However, the idea could potentially be made to work."
Turning from the air to the earth, it is interesting to note that the introduction of the underground Edison system in New York made an appeal to inventive ingenuity and that one of the difficulties was met as follows: "When we first put the Pearl Street station in operation, in New York, we had cast-iron junction-boxes at the intersections of all the streets. One night, or about two o'clock in the morning, a policeman came in and said that something had exploded at the corner of William and Nassau streets. I happened to be in the station, and went out to see what it was. I found that the cover of the manhole, weighing about 200 pounds, had entirely disappeared, but everything inside was intact. It had even stripped some of the threads of the bolts, and we could never find that cover. I concluded it was either leakage of gas into the manhole, or else the acid used in pickling the casting had given off hydrogen, and air had leaked in, making an explosive mixture. As this was a pretty serious problem, and as we had a good many of the manholes, it worried me very much for fear that it would be repeated and the company might have to pay a lot of damages, especially in districts like that around William and Nassau, where there are a good many people about. If an explosion took place in the daytime it might lift a few of them up. However, I got around the difficulty by putting a little bottle of chloroform in each box, corked up, with a slight hole in the cork. The chloroform being volatile and very heavy, settled in the box and displaced all the air. I have never heard of an explosion in a manhole where this chloroform had been used. Carbon tetrachloride, now made electrically at Niagara Falls, is very cheap and would be ideal for the purpose."
Turning from the air to the ground, it's interesting to note that the introduction of the underground Edison system in New York showcased inventive ingenuity, and one of the challenges was addressed as follows: "When we first activated the Pearl Street station in New York, we had cast-iron junction boxes at the intersections of all the streets. One night, around two o'clock in the morning, a police officer came in and said that something had exploded at the corner of William and Nassau streets. I happened to be at the station, so I went out to see what it was. I found that the cover of the manhole, which weighed about 200 pounds, had completely vanished, but everything inside was intact. It had even stripped some of the threads of the bolts, and we could never find that cover. I figured it was either gas leaking into the manhole or the acid used in pickling the casting had released hydrogen, and air had leaked in, creating an explosive mixture. Since this was quite a serious issue and we had many manholes, it concerned me greatly that it could happen again, and the company might face substantial damages, especially in busy areas like around William and Nassau, where there are a lot of people. If an explosion occurred during the day, it could potentially harm a few of them. However, I solved this problem by placing a small bottle of chloroform in each box, sealed with a cork that had a tiny hole. The chloroform, being volatile and very heavy, settled in the box and pushed all the air out. I’ve never heard of an explosion in a manhole where this chloroform was used. Carbon tetrachloride, now produced electrically at Niagara Falls, is very inexpensive and would be ideal for this purpose."
Edison has never paid much attention to warfare, and has in general disdained to develop inventions for the destruction of life and property. Some years ago, however, he became the joint inventor of the Edison-Sims torpedo, with Mr. W. Scott Sims, who sought his co-operation. This is a dirigible submarine torpedo operated by electricity. In the torpedo proper, which is suspended from a long float so as to be submerged a few feet under water, are placed the small electric motor for propulsion and steering, and the explosive charge. The torpedo is controlled from the shore or ship through an electric cable which it pays out as it goes along, and all operations of varying the speed, reversing, and steering are performed at the will of the distant operator by means of currents sent through the cable. During the Spanish-American War of 1898 Edison suggested to the Navy Department the adoption of a compound of calcium carbide and calcium phosphite, which when placed in a shell and fired from a gun would explode as soon as it struck water and ignite, producing a blaze that would continue several minutes and make the ships of the enemy visible for four or five miles at sea. Moreover, the blaze could not be extinguished.
Edison has never really focused on warfare and generally refused to create inventions for destroying life and property. A few years ago, though, he collaborated with Mr. W. Scott Sims to invent the Edison-Sims torpedo, as Sims sought his help. This is an electrically operated dirigible submarine torpedo. The torpedo itself is suspended from a long float, allowing it to be submerged a few feet underwater, and contains a small electric motor for propulsion and steering, along with the explosive charge. It is controlled from the shore or a ship through an electric cable that it unwinds as it moves, allowing the operator to change speed, reverse, and steer at will using electrical currents sent through the cable. During the Spanish-American War of 1898, Edison recommended to the Navy Department a mixture of calcium carbide and calcium phosphite that, when placed in a shell and fired from a gun, would explode upon hitting water and ignite, creating a fire that would last several minutes and make enemy ships visible for four or five miles at sea. Additionally, the fire could not be extinguished.
Edison has always been deeply interested in "conservation," and much of his work has been directed toward the economy of fuel in obtaining electrical energy directly from the consumption of coal. Indeed, it will be noted that the example of his handwriting shown in these volumes deals with the importance of obtaining available energy direct from the combustible without the enormous loss in the intervening stages that makes our best modern methods of steam generation and utilization so barbarously extravagant and wasteful. Several years ago, experimenting in this field, Edison devised and operated some ingenious pyromagnetic motors and generators, based, as the name implies, on the direct application of heat to the machines. The motor is founded upon the principle discovered by the famous Dr. William Gilbert—court physician to Queen Elizabeth, and the Father of modern electricity—that the magnetic properties of iron diminish with heat. At a light-red heat, iron becomes non-magnetic, so that a strong magnet exerts no influence over it. Edison employed this peculiar property by constructing a small machine in which a pivoted bar is alternately heated and cooled. It is thus attracted toward an adjacent electromagnet when cold and is uninfluenced when hot, and as the result motion is produced.
Edison has always been really interested in "conservation," and a lot of his work has focused on using fuel efficiently to generate electrical energy directly from burning coal. In fact, if you look at the example of his handwriting included in these volumes, you'll see he emphasizes the importance of getting usable energy directly from the fuel without the massive losses that occur in the middle stages, which make our best modern steam generation methods so incredibly wasteful. A few years back, while experimenting in this area, Edison designed and operated some clever pyromagnetic motors and generators, which, as the name suggests, work by applying heat directly to the machines. The motor is based on a principle discovered by the famous Dr. William Gilbert—who was the court physician to Queen Elizabeth and is known as the Father of modern electricity—that the magnetic properties of iron decrease with heat. At a light-red heat, iron loses its magnetic properties, meaning a strong magnet won't affect it. Edison took advantage of this unique property by creating a small machine where a pivoted bar is heated and cooled alternately. This way, the bar gets pulled toward a nearby electromagnet when it's cold and is unaffected when hot, thus producing motion.
The pyromagnetic generator is based on the same phenomenon; its aim being of course to generate electrical energy directly from the heat of the combustible. The armature, or moving part of the machine, consists in reality of eight separate armatures all constructed of corrugated sheet iron covered with asbestos and wound with wire. These armatures are held in place by two circular iron plates, through the centre of which runs a shaft, carrying at its lower extremity a semicircular shield of fire-clay, which covers the ends of four of the armatures. The heat, of whatever origin, is applied from below, and the shaft being revolved, four of the armatures lose their magnetism constantly, while the other four gain it, so to speak. As the moving part revolves, therefore, currents of electricity are set up in the wires of the armatures and are collected by a commutator, as in an ordinary dynamo, placed on the upper end of the central shaft.
The pyromagnetic generator works on the same principle; its goal is to produce electrical energy directly from the heat of the fuel. The armature, or moving part of the machine, actually consists of eight separate armatures made from corrugated sheet iron, covered with asbestos and wound with wire. These armatures are held in place by two circular iron plates, with a shaft running through the center. At the bottom of the shaft, there's a semicircular shield made of fire-clay, which protects the ends of four of the armatures. Heat, from any source, is applied from below, and as the shaft rotates, four of the armatures continuously lose their magnetism, while the other four gain it, so to speak. As the moving part spins, electrical currents are generated in the wires of the armatures and are collected by a commutator, just like in a standard dynamo, located at the upper end of the central shaft.
A great variety of electrical instruments are included in Edison's inventions, many of these in fundamental or earlier forms being devised for his systems of light and power, as noted already. There are numerous others, and it might be said with truth that Edison is hardly ever without some new device of this kind in hand, as he is by no means satisfied with the present status of electrical measurements. He holds in general that the meters of to-day, whether for heavy or for feeble currents, are too expensive, and that cheaper instruments are a necessity of the times. These remarks apply more particularly to what may be termed, in general, circuit meters. In other classes Edison has devised an excellent form of magnetic bridge, being an ingenious application of the principles of the familiar Wheatstone bridge, used so extensively for measuring the electrical resistance of wires; the testing of iron for magnetic qualities being determined by it in the same way. Another special instrument is a "dead beat" galvanometer which differs from the ordinary form of galvanometer in having no coils or magnetic needle. It depends for its action upon the heating effect of the current, which causes a fine platinum-iridium wire enclosed in a glass tube to expand; thus allowing a coiled spring to act on a pivoted shaft carrying a tiny mirror. The mirror as it moves throws a beam of light upon a scale and the indications are read by the spot of light. Most novel of all the apparatus of this measuring kind is the odoroscope, which is like the tasimeter described in an earlier chapter, except that a strip of gelatine takes the place of hard rubber, as the sensitive member. Besides being affected by heat, this device is exceedingly sensitive to moisture. A few drops of water or perfume thrown on the floor of a room are sufficient to give a very decided indication on the galvanometer in circuit with the instrument. Barometers, hygrometers, and similar instruments of great delicacy can be constructed on the principle of the odoroscope; and it may also be used in determining the character or pressure of gases and vapors in which it has been placed.
A wide range of electrical instruments is included in Edison's inventions, many of which were initially developed for his lighting and power systems, as previously mentioned. There are many others, and it's true that Edison is rarely without some new device in progress, as he is not satisfied with the current state of electrical measurements. He generally believes that today's meters, whether for strong or weak currents, are too expensive, and that more affordable instruments are necessary for the times. These comments particularly relate to what can be broadly called circuit meters. In other categories, Edison has created a great design for a magnetic bridge, which cleverly applies the principles of the well-known Wheatstone bridge, used widely for measuring the electrical resistance of wires; it also tests iron for magnetic properties in the same way. Another unique instrument is a "dead beat" galvanometer, which is different from regular galvanometers because it has no coils or magnetic needle. It operates based on the heating effect of the current, which makes a fine platinum-iridium wire inside a glass tube expand; this allows a coiled spring to act on a pivoted shaft with a tiny mirror. As the mirror moves, it reflects a beam of light onto a scale, and the readings are taken from the spot of light. Most novel among this kind of measuring apparatus is the odoroscope, which is similar to the tasimeter described in an earlier chapter, except that a strip of gelatin replaces hard rubber as the sensitive component. In addition to being responsive to heat, this device is extremely sensitive to moisture. Just a few drops of water or perfume on the floor of a room can produce a significant reading on the galvanometer connected to the instrument. Barometers, hygrometers, and similar delicate instruments can be built based on the principle of the odoroscope; it can also be used to determine the characteristics or pressure of gases and vapors it's placed in.
In the list of Edison's patents at the end of this work may be noted many other of his miscellaneous inventions, covering items such as preserving fruit in vacuo, making plate-glass, drawing wire, and metallurgical processes for treatment of nickel, gold, and copper ores; but to mention these inventions separately would trespass too much on our limited space here. Hence, we shall leave the interested reader to examine that list for himself.
In the list of Edison's patents at the end of this work, you will find many of his other inventions, including things like preserving fruit in a vacuum, making plate glass, drawing wire, and processes for treating nickel, gold, and copper ores. However, discussing these inventions in detail would take up too much of our limited space here. Therefore, we invite the interested reader to check out that list on their own.
From first to last Edison has filed in the United States Patent Office—in addition to more than 1400 applications for patents—some 120 caveats embracing not less than 1500 inventions. A "caveat" is essentially a notice filed by an inventor, entitling him to receive warning from the Office of any application for a patent for an invention that would "interfere" with his own, during the year, while he is supposed to be perfecting his device. The old caveat system has now been abolished, but it served to elicit from Edison a most astounding record of ideas and possible inventions upon which he was working, and many of which he of course reduced to practice. As an example of Edison's fertility and the endless variety of subjects engaging his thoughts, the following list of matters covered by ONE caveat is given. It is needless to say that all the caveats are not quite so full of "plums," but this is certainly a wonder.
From start to finish, Edison has submitted to the United States Patent Office—along with more than 1400 patent applications—about 120 caveats covering at least 1500 inventions. A "caveat" is basically a notice filed by an inventor that allows him to get notified by the Office of any patent application for an invention that might "interfere" with his own, during the year while he is expected to be improving his device. The old caveat system has now been eliminated, but it prompted Edison to produce an astonishing record of ideas and potential inventions he was working on, many of which he actually brought to life. To illustrate Edison's creativity and the endless range of subjects on his mind, here’s a list of topics addressed by ONE caveat. It goes without saying that not all caveats are as rich in "gems," but this one is certainly remarkable.
Forty-one distinct inventions relating to the phonograph, covering various forms of recorders, arrangement of parts, making of records, shaving tool, adjustments, etc.
Forty-one different inventions related to the phonograph, including various types of recorders, parts arrangement, record production, shaving tools, adjustments, and more.
Eight forms of electric lamps using infusible earthy oxides and brought to high incandescence in vacuo by high potential current of several thousand volts; same character as impingement of X-rays on object in bulb.
Eight types of electric lamps use infusible earthy oxides and reach high brightness in a vacuum due to high voltage currents of several thousand volts; similar to the effect of X-rays hitting an object in the bulb.
A loud-speaking telephone with quartz cylinder and beam of ultra-violet light.
A loudspeaker phone with a quartz cylinder and a beam of ultraviolet light.
Four forms of arc light with special carbons.
Four types of arc lights using special carbons.
A thermostatic motor.
A thermostat motor.
A device for sealing together the inside part and bulb of an incandescent lamp mechanically.
A device that mechanically seals the inner part and bulb of an incandescent lamp together.
Regulators for dynamos and motors.
Regulators for generators and motors.
Three devices for utilizing vibrations beyond the ultra violet.
Three devices for using vibrations beyond the ultraviolet.
A great variety of methods for coating incandescent lamp filaments with silicon, titanium, chromium, osmium, boron, etc.
A wide range of methods for coating incandescent lamp filaments with silicon, titanium, chromium, osmium, boron, and more.
Several methods of making porous filaments.
Several ways to create porous filaments.
Several methods of making squirted filaments of a variety of materials, of which about thirty are specified.
Several methods for creating squirted filaments from various materials are detailed, with around thirty mentioned.
Seventeen different methods and devices for separating magnetic ores.
Seventeen different methods and tools for separating magnetic ores.
A continuously operative primary battery.
An always-on primary battery.
A musical instrument operating one of Helmholtz's artificial larynxes.
A musical instrument using one of Helmholtz's artificial voice boxes.
A siren worked by explosion of small quantities of oxygen and hydrogen mixed.
A siren operated by the explosion of small amounts of oxygen and hydrogen mixed together.
Three other sirens made to give vocal sounds or articulate speech.
Three other sirens attempted to make vocal sounds or speak.
A device for projecting sound-waves to a distance without spreading and in a straight line, on the principle of smoke rings.
A device for projecting sound waves over a distance in a straight line without spreading, based on the principle of smoke rings.
A device for continuously indicating on a galvanometer the depths of the ocean.
A device for continuously showing ocean depths on a galvanometer.
A method of preventing in a great measure friction of water against the hull of a ship and incidentally preventing fouling by barnacles.
A way to significantly reduce the friction of water against the hull of a ship and, as a bonus, prevent barnacles from growing.
A telephone receiver whereby the vibrations of the diaphragm are considerably amplified.
A telephone receiver that greatly amplifies the vibrations of the diaphragm.
Two methods of "space" telegraphy at sea.
Two methods of "space" telegraphy at sea.
An improved and extended string telephone.
An upgraded and expanded string telephone.
Devices and method of talking through water for considerable distances.
Devices and methods for communicating over long distances through water.
An audiphone for deaf people.
A hearing device for deaf people.
Sound-bridge for measuring resistance of tubes and other materials for conveying sound.
Sound bridge for measuring the resistance of tubes and other materials used for transmitting sound.
A method of testing a magnet to ascertain the existence of flaws in the iron or steel composing the same.
A way to test a magnet to check for flaws in the iron or steel it's made of.
Method of distilling liquids by incandescent conductor immersed in the liquid.
Method of distilling liquids using a heated conductor placed in the liquid.
Method of obtaining electricity direct from coal.
Method of generating electricity directly from coal.
An engine operated by steam produced by the hydration and dehydration of metallic salts.
A steam engine powered by the hydration and dehydration of metal salts.
Device and method for telegraphing photographically.
Device and method for transmitting photographs via telegraph.
Carbon crucible kept brilliantly incandescent by current in vacuo, for obtaining reaction with refractory metals.
Carbon crucible kept glowing intensely by electrical current in a vacuum, for the purpose of reacting with heat-resistant metals.
Device for examining combinations of odors and their changes by rotation at different speeds.
Device for examining how different combinations of scents change when rotated at various speeds.
From one of the preceding items it will be noted that even in the eighties Edison perceived much advantage to be gained in the line of economy by the use of lamp filaments employing refractory metals in their construction. From another caveat, filed in 1889, we extract the following, which shows that he realized the value of tungsten also for this purpose. "Filaments of carbon placed in a combustion tube with a little chloride ammonium. Chloride tungsten or titanium passed through hot tube, depositing a film of metal on the carbon; or filaments of zirconia oxide, or alumina or magnesia, thoria or other infusible oxides mixed or separate, and obtained by moistening and squirting through a die, are thus coated with above metals and used for incandescent lamps. Osmium from a volatile compound of same thus deposited makes a filament as good as carbon when in vacuo."
From one of the earlier items, it's clear that even in the 1880s, Edison saw a significant advantage in saving costs by using lamp filaments made with refractory metals. From another application filed in 1889, we find the following, which indicates that he recognized the value of tungsten for this purpose as well: "Carbon filaments placed in a combustion tube with a bit of ammonium chloride. Tungsten or titanium chloride passed through a hot tube, depositing a metal film on the carbon; or filaments made of zirconia oxide, alumina, magnesia, thoria, or other infusible oxides, either mixed or separate, which are made by moistening and pushing through a die, are then coated with the above metals and used for incandescent lamps. Osmium from a volatile compound of the same, deposited in this way, creates a filament as good as carbon when in a vacuum."
In 1888, long before there arose the actual necessity of duplicating phonograph records so as to produce replicas in great numbers, Edison described in one of his caveats a method and process much similar to the one which was put into practice by him in later years. In the same caveat he describes an invention whereby the power to indent on a phonograph cylinder, instead of coming directly from the voice, is caused by power derived from the rotation or movement of the phonogram surface itself. He did not, however, follow up this invention and put it into practice. Some twenty years later it was independently invented and patented by another inventor. A further instance of this kind is a method of telegraphy at sea by means of a diaphragm in a closed port-hole flush with the side of the vessel, and actuated by a steam-whistle which is controlled by a lever, similarly to a Morse key. A receiving diaphragm is placed in another and near-by chamber, which is provided with very sensitive stethoscopic ear-pieces, by which the Morse characters sent from another vessel may be received. This was also invented later by another inventor, and is in use to-day, but will naturally be rivalled by wireless telegraphy. Still another instance is seen in one of Edison's caveats, where he describes a method of distilling liquids by means of internally applied heat through electric conductors. Although Edison did not follow up the idea and take out a patent, this system of distillation was later hit upon by others and is in use at the present time.
In 1888, well before there was a real need to duplicate phonograph records for mass production, Edison mentioned in one of his patent applications a method and process that was quite similar to what he later implemented. In the same application, he describes an invention where the ability to engrave on a phonograph cylinder comes not directly from the voice but from the movement of the phonogram surface itself. However, he did not pursue this invention or put it into practice. About twenty years later, it was independently invented and patented by someone else. Another example is a method of telegraphy at sea that uses a diaphragm in a sealed port-hole, flush with the side of the ship, activated by a steam whistle controlled by a lever, similar to a Morse key. A receiving diaphragm is placed in another nearby chamber, equipped with very sensitive stethoscopic ear-pieces to receive Morse characters sent from another ship. This was also later invented by someone else and is still in use today, although it will naturally face competition from wireless telegraphy. Yet another example appears in one of Edison’s caveats, where he describes a method of distilling liquids using heat applied internally through electric conductors. Although Edison did not follow up on this idea or file for a patent, this distillation method was later developed by others and is currently in use.
In the foregoing pages of this chapter the authors have endeavored to present very briefly a sketchy notion of the astounding range of Edison's practical ideas, but they feel a sense of impotence in being unable to deal adequately with the subject in the space that can be devoted to it. To those who, like the authors, have had the privilege of examining the voluminous records which show the flights of his imagination, there comes a feeling of utter inadequacy to convey to others the full extent of the story they reveal.
In the previous pages of this chapter, the authors have tried to provide a brief overview of the incredible variety of Edison's practical ideas, but they feel powerless to cover the topic thoroughly within the limited space available. For those who, like the authors, have had the chance to look at the extensive records showcasing his imaginative innovations, there’s a strong sense of inadequacy in being able to communicate the complete story they reveal.
The few specific instances above related, although not representing a tithe of Edison's work, will probably be sufficient to enable the reader to appreciate to some extent his great wealth of ideas and fertility of imagination, and also to realize that this imagination is not only intensely practical, but that it works prophetically along lines of natural progress.
The few specific examples mentioned earlier, while not even a fraction of Edison's work, should be enough for the reader to grasp, to some degree, his immense wealth of ideas and creativity. It also highlights that this creativity is not just highly practical, but that it also anticipates future advancements in a natural way.
CHAPTER XXIV
EDISON'S METHOD IN INVENTING
WHILE the world's progress depends largely upon their ingenuity, inventors are not usually persons who have adopted invention as a distinct profession, but, generally speaking, are otherwise engaged in various walks of life. By reason of more or less inherent native genius they either make improvements along lines of present occupation, or else evolve new methods and means of accomplishing results in fields for which they may have personal predilections.
WHILE the world's progress largely relies on their creativity, inventors typically don't pursue invention as a dedicated profession; instead, they are usually involved in different careers. Due to their natural talent, they either refine methods related to their current jobs or develop new approaches and techniques in areas they are personally interested in.
Now and then, however, there arises a man so greatly endowed with natural powers and originality that the creative faculty within him is too strong to endure the humdrum routine of affairs, and manifests itself in a life devoted entirely to the evolution of methods and devices calculated to further the world's welfare. In other words, he becomes an inventor by profession. Such a man is Edison. Notwithstanding the fact that nearly forty years ago (not a great while after he had emerged from the ranks of peripatetic telegraph operators) he was the owner of a large and profitable business as a manufacturer of the telegraphic apparatus invented by him, the call of his nature was too strong to allow of profits being laid away in the bank to accumulate. As he himself has said, he has "too sanguine a temperament to allow money to stay in solitary confinement." Hence, all superfluous cash was devoted to experimentation. In the course of years he grew more and more impatient of the shackles that bound him to business routine, and, realizing the powers within him, he drew away gradually from purely manufacturing occupations, determining deliberately to devote his life to inventive work, and to depend upon its results as a means of subsistence.
Every so often, a person comes along with such exceptional natural abilities and originality that their creative drive is too intense to tolerate the mundane routine of everyday life. Instead, they dedicate themselves completely to developing methods and inventions aimed at improving the world. In other words, they become professional inventors. One such person is Edison. Although nearly forty years ago—shortly after he began his career as a traveling telegraph operator—he owned a large and successful business manufacturing the telegraphic equipment he had invented, his innate drive was too compelling to let profits sit idle in the bank. As he once put it, he has "too hopeful a temperament to let money stay in solitary confinement." Therefore, any extra cash was funneled into experimentation. Over the years, he grew increasingly restless with the constraints of business routines. Recognizing the abilities within him, he gradually stepped away from purely manufacturing work, intentionally deciding to commit his life to invention and rely on its outcomes for his livelihood.
All persons who make inventions will necessarily be more or less original in character, but to the man who chooses to become an inventor by profession must be conceded a mind more than ordinarily replete with virility and originality. That these qualities in Edison are superabundant is well known to all who have worked with him, and, indeed, are apparent to every one from his multiplied achievements within the period of one generation.
All people who create inventions are bound to have varying degrees of originality in their character, but someone who decides to become a professional inventor definitely possesses a mind that's particularly rich in strength and creativity. It's well-known to everyone who has worked with Edison that he has an abundance of these qualities, and they are evident to anyone from the numerous accomplishments he has achieved in just one generation.
If one were allowed only two words with which to describe Edison, it is doubtful whether a close examination of the entire dictionary would disclose any others more suitable than "experimenter—inventor." These would express the overruling characteristics of his eventful career. It is as an "inventor" that he sets himself down in the membership list of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. To attempt the strict placing of these words in relation to each other (except alphabetically) would be equal to an endeavor to solve the old problem as to which came first, the egg or the chicken; for although all his inventions have been evolved through experiment, many of his notable experiments have called forth the exercise of highly inventive faculties in their very inception. Investigation and experiment have been a consuming passion, an impelling force from within, as it were, from his petticoat days when he collected goose-eggs and tried to hatch them out by sitting over them himself. One might be inclined to dismiss this trivial incident smilingly, as a mere childish, thoughtless prank, had not subsequent development as a child, boy, and man revealed a born investigator with original reasoning powers that, disdaining crooks and bends, always aimed at the centre, and, like the flight of the bee, were accurate and direct.
If you had to describe Edison in just two words, you’d probably agree that “experimenter-inventor” fits better than anything else in the dictionary. These words capture the main traits of his remarkable career. As an “inventor,” he proudly claims his spot in the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Trying to explain the relationship between these two terms (other than alphabetically) is as tricky as the age-old question of whether the egg or the chicken came first; while all his inventions came from experiments, quite a few of his significant experiments required a lot of inventiveness right from the start. Research and experimentation have always been his driving passion, a strong inner force, dating back to when he was a child collecting goose eggs and attempting to hatch them by sitting on them himself. You might be tempted to brush this off as a silly childhood prank, but his later life as a child, boy, and man showed that he was a natural investigator with original reasoning skills that, shunning distractions, always aimed straight at the target, much like the precise flight of a bee.
It is not surprising, therefore, that a man of this kind should exhibit a ceaseless, absorbing desire for knowledge, and an apparently uncontrollable tendency to experiment on every possible occasion, even though his last cent were spent in thus satisfying the insatiate cravings of an inquiring mind.
It's not surprising, then, that a man like this would show an endless, intense desire for knowledge and an almost irresistible urge to experiment at every opportunity, even if it meant spending his very last cent to satisfy the never-ending curiosity of his inquisitive mind.
During Edison's immature years, when he was flitting about from place to place as a telegraph operator, his experimentation was of a desultory, hand-to-mouth character, although it was always notable for originality, as expressed in a number of minor useful devices produced during this period. Small wonder, then, that at the end of these wanderings, when he had found a place to "rest the sole of his foot," he established a laboratory in which to carry on his researches in a more methodical and practical manner. In this was the beginning of the work which has since made such a profound impression on contemporary life.
During Edison's young years, when he was moving around from place to place as a telegraph operator, his experiments were mostly random and survival-based, yet they always stood out for their originality, as shown by several minor useful inventions he created during this time. It's no surprise, then, that after these travels, when he finally found a place to "rest his feet," he set up a laboratory to conduct his research in a more organized and practical way. This was the start of the work that has since had such a significant impact on modern life.
There is nothing of the helter-skelter, slap-dash style in Edison's experiments. Although all the laboratory experimenters agree in the opinion that he "tries everything," it is not merely the mixing of a little of this, some of that, and a few drops of the other, in the HOPE that SOMETHING will come of it. Nor is the spirit of the laboratory work represented in the following dialogue overheard between two alleged carpenters picked up at random to help on a hurry job.
There’s nothing chaotic or haphazard about Edison’s experiments. While all the lab researchers agree that he “tries everything,” it’s not just a mix of a bit of this, some of that, and a few drops of the other, with the hope that SOMETHING will come of it. The essence of the lab work is not captured by the following conversation overheard between two supposed carpenters randomly chosen to help with a quick project.
"How near does she fit, Mike?"
"How well does she fit, Mike?"
"About an inch."
"About 1 inch."
"Nail her!"
"Get her!"
A most casual examination of any of the laboratory records will reveal evidence of the minutest exactitude insisted on in the conduct of experiments, irrespective of the length of time they occupied. Edison's instructions, always clear cut and direct, followed by his keen oversight, admit of nothing less than implicit observance in all details, no matter where they may lead, and impel to the utmost minuteness and accuracy.
A quick look at any of the lab records will show the extreme precision required in conducting experiments, no matter how long they took. Edison's instructions were always straightforward and direct, along with his sharp supervision, allowing for nothing less than total compliance in every detail, regardless of where they might lead, and pushing for maximum precision and accuracy.
To some extent there has been a popular notion that many of Edison's successes have been due to mere dumb fool luck—to blind, fortuitous "happenings." Nothing could be further from the truth, for, on the contrary, it is owing almost entirely to the comprehensive scope of his knowledge, the breadth of his conception, the daring originality of his methods, and minuteness and extent of experiment, combined with unwavering pertinacity, that new arts have been created and additions made to others already in existence. Indeed, without this tireless minutiae, and methodical, searching spirit, it would have been practically impossible to have produced many of the most important of these inventions.
To some extent, there's a common belief that many of Edison's successes were just a result of pure luck—random, chance events. This couldn't be further from the truth. In reality, it's almost entirely due to his vast knowledge, wide-ranging ideas, bold originality in his methods, and detailed, extensive experiments, all combined with relentless determination, that new technologies have been developed and existing ones improved. In fact, without this tireless attention to detail and methodical, inquisitive approach, it would have been nearly impossible to create many of his most significant inventions.
Needless to say, mastery of its literature is regarded by him as a most important preliminary in taking up any line of investigation. What others may have done, bearing directly or collaterally on the subject, in print, is carefully considered and sifted to the point of exhaustion. Not that he takes it for granted that the conclusions are correct, for he frequently obtains vastly different results by repeating in his own way experiments made by others as detailed in books.
It's obvious that he considers having a strong grasp of the literature essential before starting any research. He thoroughly examines and analyzes what others have published, whether directly or indirectly related to the topic, to the point of exhaustion. He doesn’t just assume the conclusions are right; he often gets vastly different results by conducting his own versions of experiments documented in books.
"Edison can travel along a well-used road and still find virgin soil," remarked recently one of his most practical experimenters, who had been working along a certain line without attaining the desired result. "He wanted to get a particular compound having definite qualities, and I had tried in all sorts of ways to produce it but with only partial success. He was confident that it could be done, and said he would try it himself. In doing so he followed the same path in which I had travelled, but, by making an undreamed-of change in one of the operations, succeeded in producing a compound that virtually came up to his specifications. It is not the only time I have known this sort of thing to happen."
"Edison can walk down a well-trodden path and still discover untouched ground," remarked one of his most practical experimenters recently, who had been working on a specific project without achieving the desired outcome. "He aimed to create a particular compound with specific qualities, and I had tried various methods to make it, but only had partial success. He was sure it could be done and said he would take a shot at it himself. While doing so, he followed the same route I had taken, but by making an unexpected change in one of the processes, he managed to produce a compound that closely matched his specifications. This isn’t the first time I’ve seen something like this happen."
In speaking of Edison's method of experimenting, another of his laboratory staff says: "He is never hindered by theory, but resorts to actual experiment for proof. For instance, when he conceived the idea of pouring a complete concrete house it was universally held that it would be impossible because the pieces of stone in the mixture would not rise to the level of the pouring-point, but would gravitate to a lower plane in the soft cement. This, however, did not hinder him from making a series of experiments which resulted in an invention that proved conclusively the contrary."
When talking about Edison's approach to experimenting, another member of his lab team says: "He's never held back by theory; he relies on actual experiments for proof. For example, when he came up with the idea of pouring a complete concrete house, everyone thought it would be impossible because the stones in the mixture wouldn’t rise to the top of the pour but would sink to a lower level in the soft cement. However, that didn't stop him from conducting a series of experiments that led to an invention that definitively proved the opposite."
Having conceived some new idea and read everything obtainable relating to the subject in general, Edison's fertility of resource and originality come into play. Taking one of the laboratory note-books, he will write in it a memorandum of the experiments to be tried, illustrated, if necessary, by sketches. This book is then passed on to that member of the experimental staff whose special training and experience are best adapted to the work. Here strenuousness is expected; and an immediate commencement of investigation and prompt report are required. Sometimes the subject may be such as to call for a long line of frequent tests which necessitate patient and accurate attention to minute details. Results must be reported often—daily, or possibly with still greater frequency. Edison does not forget what is going on; but in his daily tours through the laboratory keeps in touch with all the work that is under the hands of his various assistants, showing by an instant grasp of the present conditions of any experiment that he has a full consciousness of its meaning and its reference to his original conception.
After coming up with a new idea and reading everything available on the topic, Edison's creativity and originality come into play. He grabs one of the lab notebooks and makes a note of the experiments to be conducted, sometimes including sketches for clarity. This notebook is then handed over to the team member whose training and experience are best suited for the task. Here, hard work is expected; immediate investigation and quick reporting are required. Sometimes, the topic may demand a long series of frequent tests that require careful and precise attention to small details. Results need to be reported often—daily, or possibly even more frequently. Edison stays informed about what's happening by taking daily walks through the lab, keeping up with all the work his assistants are doing. His quick understanding of the current conditions of any experiment shows that he fully grasps its significance and its relation to his original idea.
The year 1869 saw the beginning of Edison's career as an acknowledged inventor of commercial devices. From the outset, an innate recognition of system dictated the desirability and wisdom of preserving records of his experiments and inventions. The primitive records, covering the earliest years, were mainly jotted down on loose sheets of paper covered with sketches, notes, and data, pasted into large scrap-books, or preserved in packages; but with the passing of years and enlargement of his interests, it became the practice to make all original laboratory notes in large, uniform books. This course was pursued until the Menlo Park period, when he instituted a new regime that has been continued down to the present day. A standard form of note-book, about eight and a half by six inches, containing about two hundred pages, was adopted. A number of these books were (and are now) always to be found scattered around in the different sections of the laboratory, and in them have been noted by Edison all his ideas, sketches, and memoranda. Details of the various experiments concerning them have been set down by his assistants from time to time.
The year 1869 marked the start of Edison's career as a recognized inventor of commercial devices. From the beginning, he understood the importance of keeping records of his experiments and inventions. The early records were mostly scribbled on loose sheets of paper filled with sketches, notes, and data, which were either pasted into large scrapbooks or kept in packages. However, as time went on and his interests grew, he began making all original laboratory notes in large, uniform books. This method continued until the Menlo Park period, when he established a new system that is still in use today. A standard notebook, about eight and a half by six inches and containing around two hundred pages, was adopted. Several of these notebooks could always be found scattered throughout the different sections of the laboratory, where Edison recorded all his ideas, sketches, and notes. Details of the various experiments were periodically documented by his assistants.
These later laboratory note-books, of which there are now over one thousand in the series, are eloquent in the history they reveal of the strenuous labors of Edison and his assistants and the vast fields of research he has covered during the last thirty years. They are overwhelmingly rich in biographic material, but analysis would be a prohibitive task for one person, and perhaps interesting only to technical readers. Their pages cover practically every department of science. The countless thousands of separate experiments recorded exhibit the operations of a master mind seeking to surprise Nature into a betrayal of her secrets by asking her the same question in a hundred different ways. For instance, when Edison was investigating a certain problem of importance many years ago, the note-books show that on this point alone about fifteen thousand experiments and tests were made by one of his assistants.
These later lab notebooks, of which there are now over a thousand in the series, tell a powerful story of the intense work done by Edison and his team, as well as the vast areas of research he has explored over the last thirty years. They are packed with biographical material, but analyzing them would be too much for one person and might only be interesting to technical readers. Their pages cover nearly every branch of science. The countless thousands of individual experiments documented showcase the efforts of a brilliant mind trying to get Nature to reveal her secrets by asking the same question in a hundred different ways. For example, when Edison was looking into a particular important problem many years ago, the notebooks show that his assistant conducted around fifteen thousand experiments and tests on just this issue.
A most casual glance over these note-books will illustrate the following remark, which was made to one of the writers not long ago by a member of the laboratory staff who has been experimenting there for twenty years: "Edison can think of more ways of doing a thing than any man I ever saw or heard of. He tries everything and never lets up, even though failure is apparently staring him in the face. He only stops when he simply can't go any further on that particular line. When he decides on any mode of procedure he gives his notes to the experimenter and lets him alone, only stepping in from time to time to look at the operations and receive reports of progress."
A quick look at these notebooks shows the following observation made recently to one of the writers by a lab staff member who has been working there for twenty years: "Edison can come up with more ways to do something than any person I've ever seen or heard of. He tries everything and never gives up, even when failure seems obvious. He only stops when he literally can't continue with that particular approach. When he settles on a method, he hands his notes to the experimenter and leaves them to it, only checking in occasionally to see how things are going and get progress updates."
The history of the development of the telephone transmitter, phonograph, incandescent lamp, dynamo, electrical distributing systems from central stations, electric railway, ore-milling, cement, motion pictures, and a host of minor inventions may be found embedded in the laboratory note-books. A passing glance at a few pages of these written records will serve to illustrate, though only to a limited extent, the thoroughness of Edison's method. It is to be observed that these references can be but of the most meagre kind, and must be regarded as merely throwing a side-light on the subject itself. For instance, the complex problem of a practical telephone transmitter gave rise to a series of most exhaustive experiments. Combinations in almost infinite variety, including gums, chemical compounds, oils, minerals, and metals were suggested by Edison; and his assistants were given long lists of materials to try with reference to predetermined standards of articulation, degrees of loudness, and perfection of hissing sounds. The note-books contain hundreds of pages showing that a great many thousands of experiments were tried and passed upon. Such remarks as "N. G."; "Pretty good"; "Whistling good, but no articulation"; "Rattly"; "Articulation, whispering, and whistling good"; "Best to-night so far"; and others are noted opposite the various combinations as they were tried. Thus, one may follow the investigation through a maze of experiments which led up to the successful invention of the carbon button transmitter, the vital device to give the telephone its needed articulation and perfection.
The history of the development of the telephone transmitter, phonograph, incandescent lamp, dynamo, electrical distribution systems from central stations, electric railway, ore-milling, cement, motion pictures, and many other minor inventions can be found in the laboratory notebooks. A quick look at a few pages of these records will show, although only to a limited extent, the thoroughness of Edison's approach. It's important to note that these references are quite sparse and should be seen as just providing a glimpse into the subject. For example, the complex issue of a practical telephone transmitter led to a series of extensive experiments. Edison suggested combinations of nearly endless varieties, including gums, chemical compounds, oils, minerals, and metals; his assistants received long lists of materials to test based on specific standards for clarity, loudness, and the quality of hissing sounds. The notebooks contain hundreds of pages demonstrating that many thousands of experiments were conducted and evaluated. Comments like "N. G."; "Pretty good"; "Whistling good, but no clarity"; "Rattly"; "Clarity, whispering, and whistling good"; "Best so far tonight"; and others are noted alongside the various combinations as they were tested. Therefore, one can trace the investigation through a complex range of experiments that ultimately led to the successful invention of the carbon button transmitter, the crucial device that provided the telephone with the clarity and quality it needed.
The two hundred and odd note-books, covering the strenuous period during which Edison was carrying on his electric-light experiments, tell on their forty thousand pages or more a fascinating story of the evolution of a new art in its entirety. From the crude beginnings, through all the varied phases of this evolution, the operations of a master mind are apparent from the contents of these pages, in which are recorded the innumerable experiments, calculations, and tests that ultimately brought light out of darkness.
The two hundred or so notebooks, covering the challenging time when Edison was working on his electric light experiments, share an intriguing story of the complete evolution of a new art across their more than forty thousand pages. From the rough beginnings to all the different stages of this evolution, the actions of a brilliant mind are clear from the contents of these pages, which document the countless experiments, calculations, and tests that eventually turned darkness into light.
The early work on a metallic conductor for lamps gave rise to some very thorough research on melting and alloying metals, the preparation of metallic oxides, the coating of fine wires by immersing them in a great variety of chemical solutions. Following his usual custom, Edison would indicate the lines of experiment to be followed, which were carried out and recorded in the note-books. He himself, in January, 1879, made personally a most minute and searching investigation into the properties and behavior of plating-iridium, boron, rutile, zircon, chromium, molybdenum, and nickel, under varying degrees of current strength, on which there may be found in the notes about forty pages of detailed experiments and deductions in his own handwriting, concluding with the remark (about nickel): "This is a great discovery for electric light in the way of economy."
The early work on a metal conductor for lamps led to extensive research on melting and alloying metals, preparing metallic oxides, and coating fine wires by dipping them in various chemical solutions. As usual, Edison outlined the experimental directions to be followed, which were carried out and documented in the notebooks. In January 1879, he personally conducted a detailed investigation into the properties and behavior of plating iridium, boron, rutile, zircon, chromium, molybdenum, and nickel under different levels of current. This resulted in about forty pages of detailed experiments and conclusions written in his own handwriting, concluding with the note (about nickel): "This is a great discovery for electric light in terms of cost."
This period of research on nickel, etc., was evidently a trying one, for after nearly a month's close application he writes, on January 27, 1879: "Owing to the enormous power of the light my eyes commenced to pain after seven hours' work, and I had to quit." On the next day appears the following entry: "Suffered the pains of hell with my eyes last night from 10 P.M. till 4 A.M., when got to sleep with a big dose of morphine. Eyes getting better, and do not pain much at 4 P.M.; but I lose to-day."
This period of research on nickel and such was clearly a challenging one, because after almost a month of intense work, he writes on January 27, 1879: "Due to the intense brightness of the light, my eyes started to hurt after seven hours of work, and I had to stop." The next day, he records: "I suffered terrible pain in my eyes last night from 10 P.M. to 4 A.M., when I finally fell asleep after taking a strong dose of morphine. My eyes are improving, and they don't hurt much at 4 P.M., but I've lost a day."
The "try everything" spirit of Edison's method is well illustrated in this early period by a series of about sixteen hundred resistance tests of various ores, minerals, earths, etc., occupying over fifty pages of one of the note-books relating to the metallic filament for his lamps.
The "try everything" attitude of Edison's approach is clearly shown in this early phase through about sixteen hundred resistance tests on different ores, minerals, soils, and more, which take up over fifty pages in one of the notebooks about the metallic filament for his lamps.
But, as the reader has already learned, the metallic filament was soon laid aside in favor of carbon, and we find in the laboratory notes an amazing record of research and experiment conducted in the minute and searching manner peculiar to Edison's method. His inquiries were directed along all the various roads leading to the desired goal, for long before he had completed the invention of a practical lamp he realized broadly the fundamental requirements of a successful system of electrical distribution, and had given instructions for the making of a great variety of calculations which, although far in advance of the time, were clearly foreseen by him to be vitally important in the ultimate solution of the complicated problem. Thus we find many hundreds of pages of the note-books covered with computations and calculations by Mr. Upton, not only on the numerous ramifications of the projected system and comparisons with gas, but also on proposed forms of dynamos and the proposed station in New York. A mere recital by titles of the vast number of experiments and tests on carbons, lamps, dynamos, armatures, commutators, windings, systems, regulators, sockets, vacuum-pumps, and the thousand and one details relating to the subject in general, originated by Edison, and methodically and systematically carried on under his general direction, would fill a great many pages here, and even then would serve only to convey a confused impression of ceaseless probing.
But, as the reader has already learned, the metal filament was quickly set aside for carbon, and we find in the lab notes an incredible record of research and experiments conducted in the detailed and thorough manner unique to Edison's approach. His inquiries were directed down all the various paths leading to the desired goal, for long before he completed the invention of a practical lamp, he understood the fundamental requirements of a successful electrical distribution system. He had given instructions for creating a wide range of calculations that, although ahead of their time, he clearly saw as crucial to solving the complex problem. Thus, we find hundreds of pages in the notebooks filled with computations and calculations by Mr. Upton, not just on the many branches of the planned system and comparisons with gas, but also on proposed types of dynamos and the planned station in New York. Just listing the titles of the vast number of experiments and tests on carbons, lamps, dynamos, armatures, commutators, windings, systems, regulators, sockets, vacuum pumps, and the countless details related to the subject developed by Edison, and systematically carried out under his general direction, would take up many pages and still only give a jumbled impression of endless exploration.
It is possible only to a broad, comprehensive mind well stored with knowledge, and backed with resistless, boundless energy, that such a diversified series of experiments and investigations could be carried on simultaneously and assimilated, even though they should relate to a class of phenomena already understood and well defined. But if we pause to consider that the commercial subdivision of the electric current (which was virtually an invention made to order) involved the solution of problems so unprecedented that even they themselves had to be created, we cannot but conclude that the afflatus of innate genius played an important part in the unique methods of investigation instituted by Edison at that and other times.
Only a broad and well-informed mind, filled with knowledge and supported by unstoppable, endless energy, could handle such a diverse range of experiments and investigations at the same time and make sense of them, even if they pertained to phenomena that were already understood and clearly defined. However, if we take a moment to consider that the commercial subdivision of electric current (which was essentially a custom-made invention) involved solving problems so unprecedented that they had to be created from scratch, we must conclude that the spark of innate genius played a significant role in the unique methods of investigation that Edison established during that time and beyond.
The idea of attributing great successes to "genius" has always been repudiated by Edison, as evidenced by his historic remark that "Genius is 1 per cent. inspiration and 99 per cent. perspiration." Again, in a conversation many years ago at the laboratory between Edison, Batchelor, and E. H. Johnson, the latter made allusion to Edison's genius as evidenced by some of his achievements, when Edison replied:
The belief that significant achievements are due to "genius" has always been rejected by Edison, shown in his famous quote that "Genius is 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration." In a conversation years ago in the lab with Edison, Batchelor, and E. H. Johnson, Johnson referenced Edison's genius based on his accomplishments, to which Edison responded:
"Stuff! I tell you genius is hard work, stick-to-it-iveness, and common sense."
"Stuff! I'm telling you, genius is all about hard work, perseverance, and common sense."
"Yes," said Johnson, "I admit there is all that to it, but there's still more. Batch and I have those qualifications, but although we knew quite a lot about telephones, and worked hard, we couldn't invent a brand-new non-infringing telephone receiver as you did when Gouraud cabled for one. Then, how about the subdivision of the electric light?"
"Yeah," Johnson said, "I get that, but there's even more to consider. Batch and I have those qualifications, but even though we knew a lot about telephones and worked hard, we couldn't come up with a whole new non-infringing telephone receiver like you did when Gouraud asked for one. So, what about the subdivision of electric light?"
"Electric current," corrected Edison.
"Electric current," Edison corrected.
"True," continued Johnson; "you were the one to make that very distinction. The scientific world had been working hard on subdivision for years, using what appeared to be common sense. Results worse than nil. Then you come along, and about the first thing you do, after looking the ground over, is to start off in the opposite direction, which subsequently proves to be the only possible way to reach the goal. It seems to me that this is pretty close to the dictionary definition of genius."
"That's true," Johnson continued. "You were the one who made that distinction. The scientific community had been grinding away at subdivision for years, relying on what seemed like common sense. The results were worse than nothing. Then you show up, and the first thing you do after checking things out is head off in the opposite direction, which turns out to be the only way to actually achieve the goal. To me, that’s pretty much a perfect example of genius."
It is said that Edison replied rather incoherently and changed the topic of conversation.
It’s said that Edison responded somewhat ramblingly and shifted the subject.
This innate modesty, however, does not prevent Edison from recognizing and classifying his own methods of investigation. In a conversation with two old associates recently (April, 1909), he remarked: "It has been said of me that my methods are empirical. That is true only so far as chemistry is concerned. Did you ever realize that practically all industrial chemistry is colloidal in its nature? Hard rubber, celluloid, glass, soap, paper, and lots of others, all have to deal with amorphous substances, as to which comparatively little has been really settled. My methods are similar to those followed by Luther Burbank. He plants an acre, and when this is in bloom he inspects it. He has a sharp eye, and can pick out of thousands a single plant that has promise of what he wants. From this he gets the seed, and uses his skill and knowledge in producing from it a number of new plants which, on development, furnish the means of propagating an improved variety in large quantity. So, when I am after a chemical result that I have in mind, I may make hundreds or thousands of experiments out of which there may be one that promises results in the right direction. This I follow up to its legitimate conclusion, discarding the others, and usually get what I am after. There is no doubt about this being empirical; but when it comes to problems of a mechanical nature, I want to tell you that all I've ever tackled and solved have been done by hard, logical thinking." The intense earnestness and emphasis with which this was said were very impressive to the auditors. This empirical method may perhaps be better illustrated by a specific example. During the latter part of the storage battery investigations, after the form of positive element had been determined upon, it became necessary to ascertain what definite proportions and what quality of nickel hydrate and nickel flake would give the best results. A series of positive tubes were filled with the two materials in different proportions—say, nine parts hydrate to one of flake; eight parts hydrate to two of flake; seven parts hydrate to three of flake, and so on through varying proportions. Three sets of each of these positives were made, and all put into separate test tubes with a uniform type of negative element. These were carried through a long series of charges and discharges under strict test conditions. From the tabulated results of hundreds of tests there were selected three that showed the best results. These, however, showed only the superiority of certain PROPORTIONS of the materials. The next step would be to find out the best QUALITY. Now, as there are several hundred variations in the quality of nickel flake, and perhaps a thousand ways to make the hydrate, it will be realized that Edison's methods led to stupendous detail, for these tests embraced a trial of all the qualities of both materials in the three proportions found to be most suitable. Among these many thousands of experiments any that showed extraordinary results were again elaborated by still further series of tests, until Edison was satisfied that he had obtained the best result in that particular line.
This natural modesty, however, doesn’t stop Edison from understanding and categorizing his own research methods. In a conversation with two long-time associates recently (April 1909), he said: "People say my methods are empirical. That's true only when it comes to chemistry. Have you ever noticed that nearly all industrial chemistry is colloidal in nature? Hard rubber, celluloid, glass, soap, paper, and many others all involve amorphous substances, and not much is really settled about them. My methods are similar to those of Luther Burbank. He plants an acre, and when it blooms, he inspects it. He has a keen eye and can pick out a single plant with promise from thousands. From that, he gets the seed and uses his expertise to produce several new plants, which, when developed, allow for the propagation of an improved variety in large quantities. So, when I’m pursuing a chemical result that I have in mind, I might conduct hundreds or thousands of experiments, out of which one may show potential in the right direction. I then follow that up to its logical conclusion, discarding the others, and I usually get what I'm aiming for. No doubt this is empirical; but when it comes to mechanical problems, I want to tell you that everything I’ve taken on and solved has been through hard, logical thinking." The strong earnestness and emphasis with which this was stated were very striking to those listening. This empirical method might be better illustrated through a specific example. During the later stages of the storage battery investigations, after determining the form of the positive element, it became necessary to find out what specific proportions and what quality of nickel hydrate and nickel flake would yield the best results. A series of positive tubes were filled with the two materials in different proportions—like nine parts hydrate to one of flake; eight parts hydrate to two of flake; seven parts hydrate to three of flake, and so on with various proportions. Three sets of each of these positives were created and placed into separate test tubes with a uniform type of negative element. These were subjected to a lengthy series of charges and discharges under strict testing conditions. From the compiled results of hundreds of tests, three were chosen that showed the best outcomes. However, these only indicated the superiority of certain PROPORTIONS of the materials. The next step was to discover the best QUALITY. Since there are several hundred variations in the quality of nickel flake and perhaps a thousand ways to create the hydrate, it becomes clear that Edison’s methods required immense detail, as these tests included trials of all the qualities of both materials in the three proportions determined to be most suitable. Among the many thousands of experiments, those that showed exceptional results were further developed through additional series of tests, until Edison was convinced he had achieved the best result in that specific area.
The laboratory note-books do not always tell the whole story or meaning of an experiment that may be briefly outlined on one of their pages. For example, the early filament made of a mixture of lampblack and tar is merely a suggestion in the notes, but its making afforded an example of Edison's pertinacity. These materials, when mixed, became a friable mass, which he had found could be brought into such a cohesive, putty-like state by manipulation, as to be capable of being rolled out into filaments as fine as seven-thousandths of an inch in cross-section. One of the laboratory assistants was told to make some of this mixture, knead it, and roll some filaments. After a time he brought the mass to Edison, and said:
The lab notebooks don’t always capture the full story or meaning of an experiment that might be briefly summarized on one of their pages. For example, the early filament made from a mix of lampblack and tar is just a suggestion in the notes, but its creation showcased Edison's determination. These materials, when combined, turned into a brittle mass that he discovered could be transformed into a cohesive, putty-like state through manipulation, allowing it to be rolled into filaments as thin as seven-thousandths of an inch in diameter. One of the lab assistants was instructed to prepare this mixture, knead it, and roll out some filaments. After a while, he brought the mass to Edison and said:
"There's something wrong about this, for it crumbles even after manipulating it with my fingers."
"There's something off about this, because it falls apart even after I handle it with my fingers."
"How long did you knead it?" said Edison.
"How long did you knead it?" Edison asked.
"Oh! more than an hour," replied the assistant.
"Oh! more than an hour," replied the assistant.
"Well, just keep on for a few hours more and it will come out all right," was the rejoinder. And this proved to be correct, for, after a prolonged kneading and rolling, the mass changed into a cohesive, stringy, homogeneous putty. It was from a mixture of this kind that spiral filaments were made and used in some of the earliest forms of successful incandescent lamps; indeed, they are described and illustrated in Edison's fundamental lamp patent (No. 223,898).
"Just keep going for a few more hours and it will turn out fine," was the response. And this turned out to be true, because after a long process of kneading and rolling, the mixture became a cohesive, stretchy, uniform putty. It was from this kind of mixture that spiral filaments were created and used in some of the first successful incandescent lamps; in fact, they are described and illustrated in Edison's key lamp patent (No. 223,898).
The present narrative would assume the proportions of a history of the incandescent lamp, should the authors attempt to follow Edison's investigations through the thousands of pages of note-books away back in the eighties and early nineties. Improvement of the lamp was constantly in his mind all those years, and besides the vast amount of detail experimental work he laid out for his assistants, he carried on a great deal of research personally. Sometimes whole books are filled in his own handwriting with records of experiments showing every conceivable variation of some particular line of inquiry; each trial bearing some terse comment expressive of results. In one book appear the details of one of these experiments on September 3, 1891, at 4.30 A.M., with the comment: "Brought up lamp higher than a 16-c.p. 240 was ever brought before—Hurrah!" Notwithstanding the late hour, he turns over to the next page and goes on to write his deductions from this result as compared with those previously obtained. Proceeding day by day, as appears by this same book, he follows up another line of investigation on lamps, apparently full of difficulty, for after one hundred and thirty-two other recorded experiments we find this note: "Saturday 3.30 went home disgusted with incandescent lamps." This feeling was evidently evanescent, for on the succeeding Monday the work was continued and carried on by him as keenly as before, as shown by the next batch of notes.
The current story could turn into a history of the incandescent lamp if the authors tried to trace Edison's research through the thousands of pages of notebooks from the eighties and early nineties. Improving the lamp was constantly on his mind during those years, and in addition to the vast amount of detailed experimental work he assigned to his assistants, he did a lot of personal research. Sometimes entire books are filled with his handwriting, documenting experiments that show every possible variation of a particular line of inquiry; each trial has a brief comment summarizing the results. In one book, there are details of an experiment from September 3, 1891, at 4:30 A.M., with the note: "Brought up lamp higher than a 16-c.p. 240 was ever brought before—Hurrah!" Despite the late hour, he flips to the next page and continues writing his deductions from this result compared to earlier findings. Day by day, as noted in the same book, he pursues another line of investigation on lamps, which seems quite challenging, because after one hundred and thirty-two recorded experiments, we find this note: "Saturday 3:30 went home disgusted with incandescent lamps." This feeling was clearly short-lived, as the following Monday, he resumed the work with the same enthusiasm, as shown by the next set of notes.
This is the only instance showing any indication of impatience that the authors have found in looking through the enormous mass of laboratory notes. All his assistants agree that Edison is the most patient, tireless experimenter that could be conceived of. Failures do not distress him; indeed, he regards them as always useful, as may be gathered from the following, related by Dr. E. G. Acheson, formerly one of his staff: "I once made an experiment in Edison's laboratory at Menlo Park during the latter part of 1880, and the results were not as looked for. I considered the experiment a perfect failure, and while bemoaning the results of this apparent failure Mr. Edison entered, and, after learning the facts of the case, cheerfully remarked that I should not look upon it as a failure, for he considered every experiment a success, as in all cases it cleared up the atmosphere, and even though it failed to accomplish the results sought for, it should prove a valuable lesson for guidance in future work. I believe that Mr. Edison's success as an experimenter was, to a large extent, due to this happy view of all experiments."
This is the only instance showing any sign of impatience that the authors have found while sifting through the huge volume of lab notes. All his assistants agree that Edison is the most patient, tireless experimenter imaginable. Failures don’t bother him; in fact, he sees them as always useful, as shown by the following story told by Dr. E. G. Acheson, who was once on his team: "I once conducted an experiment in Edison's lab at Menlo Park in late 1880, and the results weren’t what I had hoped for. I thought the experiment was a complete failure, and while I was lamenting the outcome of this apparent failure, Mr. Edison walked in. After learning the situation, he cheerfully said that I shouldn’t think of it as a failure, because he believed every experiment was a success since it always cleared the air. Even if it didn't achieve the desired results, it should provide a valuable lesson for future work. I think Mr. Edison’s success as an experimenter was largely due to this positive outlook on all experiments."
Edison has frequently remarked that out of a hundred experiments he does not expect more than one to be successful, and as to that one he is always suspicious until frequent repetition has verified the original results.
Edison often said that out of a hundred experiments, he doesn’t expect more than one to succeed, and he always has doubts about that one until he has repeated it enough times to confirm the initial findings.
This patient, optimistic view of the outcome of experiments has remained part of his character down to this day, just as his painstaking, minute, incisive methods are still unchanged. But to the careless, stupid, or lazy person he is a terror for the short time they remain around him. Honest mistakes may be tolerated, but not carelessness, incompetence, or lack of attention to business. In such cases Edison is apt to express himself freely and forcibly, as when he was asked why he had parted with a certain man, he said: "Oh, he was so slow that it would take him half an hour to get out of the field of a microscope." Another instance will be illustrative. Soon after the Brockton (Massachusetts) central station was started in operation many years ago, he wrote a note to Mr. W. S. Andrews, containing suggestions as to future stations, part of which related to the various employees and their duties. After outlining the duties of the meter man, Edison says: "I should not take too young a man for this, say, a man from twenty-three to thirty years old, bright and businesslike. Don't want any one who yearns to enter a laboratory and experiment. We have a bad case of that at Brockton; he neglects business to potter. What we want is a good lamp average and no unprofitable customer. You should have these men on probation and subject to passing an examination by me. This will wake them up."
This patient's optimistic view of experimental outcomes has remained part of his character to this day, just as his careful, detailed, and sharp methods are still the same. However, to those who are careless, foolish, or lazy, he can be a nightmare for the brief time they’re around him. Honest mistakes might be tolerated, but not carelessness, incompetence, or a lack of focus on the job. In such cases, Edison tends to speak his mind strongly, as when he was asked why he let go of a certain man—he replied, "Oh, he was so slow it would take him half an hour to get out of the field of a microscope." Another example illustrates this point. Shortly after the Brockton (Massachusetts) central station began operations many years ago, he wrote a note to Mr. W. S. Andrews with suggestions for future stations, some of which pertained to the various employees and their responsibilities. After outlining the duties of the meter man, Edison says, "I wouldn’t hire someone too young for this, let’s say a man between twenty-three and thirty years old, sharp and professional. I don’t want anyone who dreams of entering a lab to experiment. We have a problem with that in Brockton; he neglects work to tinker. What we need is a good lamp average and no unprofitable customers. You should put these men on probation and require them to pass an exam from me. This will wake them up."
Edison's examinations are no joke, according to Mr. J. H. Vail, formerly one of the Menlo Park staff. "I wanted a job," he said, "and was ambitious to take charge of the dynamo-room. Mr. Edison led me to a heap of junk in a corner and said: 'Put that together and let me know when it's running.' I didn't know what it was, but received a liberal education in finding out. It proved to be a dynamo, which I finally succeeded in assembling and running. I got the job." Another man who succeeded in winning a place as assistant was Mr. John F. Ott, who has remained in his employ for over forty years. In 1869, when Edison was occupying his first manufacturing shop (the third floor of a small building in Newark), he wanted a first-class mechanician, and Mr. Ott was sent to him. "He was then an ordinary-looking young fellow," says Mr. Ott, "dirty as any of the other workmen, unkempt, and not much better dressed than a tramp, but I immediately felt that there was a great deal in him." This is the conversation that ensued, led by Mr. Edison's question:
Edison's tests are serious business, according to Mr. J. H. Vail, who used to work at Menlo Park. "I wanted a job," he said, "and was eager to take charge of the dynamo room. Mr. Edison took me to a pile of junk in a corner and said: 'Put that together and let me know when it's running.' I had no idea what it was, but I got a crash course in figuring it out. It turned out to be a dynamo, which I eventually managed to assemble and get running. I got the job." Another person who managed to secure a position as an assistant was Mr. John F. Ott, who has worked for him for over forty years. In 1869, when Edison was using his first manufacturing shop (the third floor of a small building in Newark), he needed a top-notch mechanic, and Mr. Ott was sent to him. "He was just an ordinary-looking young guy," says Mr. Ott, "as dirty as the other workers, messy, and not dressed much better than a homeless person, but I immediately sensed that he had a lot of potential." This is the conversation that followed, starting with Mr. Edison's question:
"What do you want?"
"What do you want?"
"Work."
"Get to work."
"Can you make this machine work?" (exhibiting it and explaining its details).
"Can you get this machine to work?" (showing it and explaining its details).
"Yes."
"Yep."
"Are you sure?"
"Are you certain?"
"Well, you needn't pay me if I don't."
"Well, you don't have to pay me if I don't."
And thus Mr. Ott went to work and succeeded in accomplishing the results desired. Two weeks afterward Mr. Edison put him in charge of the shop.
And so Mr. Ott went to work and successfully achieved the desired results. Two weeks later, Mr. Edison put him in charge of the shop.
Edison's life fairly teems with instances of unruffled patience in the pursuit of experiments. When he feels thoroughly impressed with the possibility of accomplishing a certain thing, he will settle down composedly to investigate it to the end.
Edison's life is full of examples of calm patience in the pursuit of experiments. When he is truly convinced that he can achieve something, he calmly dedicates himself to exploring it until he gets to the bottom of it.
This is well illustrated in a story relating to his invention of the type of storage battery bearing his name. Mr. W. S. Mallory, one of his closest associates for many years, is the authority for the following: "When Mr. Edison decided to shut down the ore-milling plant at Edison, New Jersey, in which I had been associated with him, it became a problem as to what he could profitably take up next, and we had several discussions about it. He finally thought that a good storage battery was a great requisite, and decided to try and devise a new type, for he declared emphatically he would make no battery requiring sulphuric acid. After a little thought he conceived the nickel-iron idea, and started to work at once with characteristic energy. About 7 or 7.30 A.M. he would go down to the laboratory and experiment, only stopping for a short time at noon to eat a lunch sent down from the house. About 6 o'clock the carriage would call to take him to dinner, from which he would return by 7.30 or 8 o'clock to resume work. The carriage came again at midnight to take him home, but frequently had to wait until 2 or 3 o'clock, and sometimes return without him, as he had decided to continue all night.
This is clearly shown in a story about his invention of the type of storage battery that carries his name. Mr. W. S. Mallory, one of his closest associates for many years, provides the following account: "When Mr. Edison decided to shut down the ore-milling plant in Edison, New Jersey, where I had worked with him, we faced the question of what he could profitably pursue next, and we had several discussions about it. He eventually thought that a good storage battery was essential and decided to create a new type, declaring strongly that he would not make any battery that required sulfuric acid. After some reflection, he came up with the nickel-iron concept and immediately got to work with his usual energy. Around 7 or 7:30 A.M., he would head down to the lab to experiment, only taking a short break at noon for a lunch sent down from the house. At about 6 o'clock, a carriage would come to take him to dinner, from which he would return by 7:30 or 8 o'clock to continue working. The carriage returned again at midnight to take him home, but often had to wait until 2 or 3 o'clock, and sometimes left without him, as he chose to work through the night."
"This had been going on more than five months, seven days a week, when I was called down to the laboratory to see him. I found him at a bench about three feet wide and twelve to fifteen feet long, on which there were hundreds of little test cells that had been made up by his corps of chemists and experimenters. He was seated at this bench testing, figuring, and planning. I then learned that he had thus made over nine thousand experiments in trying to devise this new type of storage battery, but had not produced a single thing that promised to solve the question. In view of this immense amount of thought and labor, my sympathy got the better of my judgment, and I said: 'Isn't it a shame that with the tremendous amount of work you have done you haven't been able to get any results?' Edison turned on me like a flash, and with a smile replied: 'Results! Why, man, I have gotten a lot of results! I know several thousand things that won't work.'
"This had been going on for more than five months, seven days a week, when I was called down to the lab to see him. I found him at a bench about three feet wide and twelve to fifteen feet long, covered with hundreds of little test cells created by his team of chemists and researchers. He was seated at this bench testing, calculating, and planning. I then learned that he had conducted over nine thousand experiments trying to create this new type of storage battery, but he hadn't produced anything that seemed to solve the problem. Given this huge amount of thought and effort, my sympathy got the better of my judgment, and I said: 'Isn't it a shame that with all the hard work you've done you haven't been able to get any results?' Edison turned to me like a flash and with a smile replied: 'Results! Man, I've gotten plenty of results! I know several thousand things that won't work.'"
"At that time he sent me out West on a special mission. On my return, a few weeks later, his experiments had run up to over ten thousand, but he had discovered the missing link in the combination sought for. Of course, we all remember how the battery was completed and put on the market. Then, because he was dissatisfied with it, he stopped the sales and commenced a new line of investigation, which has recently culminated successfully. I shouldn't wonder if his experiments on the battery ran up pretty near to fifty thousand, for they fill more than one hundred and fifty of the note-books, to say nothing of some thousands of tests in curve sheets."
"At that time, he sent me out West on a special mission. When I got back a few weeks later, his experiments had exceeded ten thousand, and he had found the missing link in the combination he was looking for. Of course, we all remember how the battery was finalized and launched. However, since he wasn't satisfied with it, he halted the sales and started a new line of investigation, which has recently been successful. I wouldn’t be surprised if his experiments on the battery reached nearly fifty thousand, as they fill over one hundred and fifty notebooks, not to mention several thousand tests in curve sheets."
Although Edison has an absolute disregard for the total outlay of money in investigation, he is particular to keep down the cost of individual experiments to a minimum, for, as he observed to one of his assistants: "A good many inventors try to develop things life-size, and thus spend all their money, instead of first experimenting more freely on a small scale." To Edison life is not only a grand opportunity to find out things by experiment, but, when found, to improve them by further experiment. One night, after receiving a satisfactory report of progress from Mr. Mason, superintendent of the cement plant, he said: "The only way to keep ahead of the procession is to experiment. If you don't, the other fellow will. When there's no experimenting there's no progress. Stop experimenting and you go backward. If anything goes wrong, experiment until you get to the very bottom of the trouble."
Although Edison doesn't care much about the total amount of money spent on research, he makes sure to keep the cost of each individual experiment as low as possible. As he once told one of his assistants, "A lot of inventors try to develop things at full scale, which ends up costing them all their money, instead of experimenting on a smaller scale first." For Edison, life is not just a great opportunity to discover things through experimentation, but also a chance to improve them through further experiments. One night, after getting a positive update on progress from Mr. Mason, the superintendent of the cement plant, he said: "The only way to stay ahead is to experiment. If you don't, someone else will. Without experimentation, there's no progress. Stop experimenting, and you fall behind. If anything goes wrong, keep experimenting until you figure out exactly what the problem is."
It is easy to realize, therefore, that a character so thoroughly permeated with these ideas is not apt to stop and figure out expense when in hot pursuit of some desired object. When that object has been attained, however, and it passes from the experimental to the commercial stage, Edison's monetary views again come into strong play, but they take a diametrically opposite position, for he then begins immediately to plan the extreme of economy in the production of the article. A thousand and one instances could be quoted in illustration; but as they would tend to change the form of this narrative into a history of economy in manufacture, it will suffice to mention but one, and that a recent occurrence, which serves to illustrate how closely he keeps in touch with everything, and also how the inventive faculty and instinct of commercial economy run close together. It was during Edison's winter stay in Florida, in March, 1909. He had reports sent to him daily from various places, and studied them carefully, for he would write frequently with comments, instructions, and suggestions; and in one case, commenting on the oiling system at the cement plant, he wrote: "Your oil losses are now getting lower, I see." Then, after suggesting some changes to reduce them still further, he went on to say: "Here is a chance to save a mill per barrel based on your regular daily output."
It’s clear that a character deeply immersed in these ideas isn’t likely to calculate costs when in hot pursuit of something they want. However, once that goal is achieved and it shifts from being experimental to commercial, Edison’s views on money come into play again, but in a completely different way. He immediately starts planning for maximum efficiency in producing the product. There are countless examples to illustrate this, but instead of turning this narrative into a history of manufacturing efficiency, I’ll mention just one recent incident that shows how closely he stays connected to everything and how his inventive mindset aligns with commercial efficiency. This happened during Edison's winter stay in Florida in March 1909. He had reports sent to him daily from various locations and studied them closely, often writing back with comments, instructions, and suggestions. In one instance, regarding the oiling system at the cement plant, he noted: "I see your oil losses are getting lower." After recommending some changes to further reduce those losses, he added: "Here is a chance to save a mill per barrel based on your regular daily output."
This thorough consideration of the smallest detail is essentially characteristic of Edison, not only in economy of manufacture, but in all his work, no matter of what kind, whether it be experimenting, investigating, testing, or engineering. To follow him through the labyrinthine paths of investigation contained in the great array of laboratory note-books is to become involved in a mass of minutely detailed searches which seek to penetrate the inmost recesses of nature by an ultimate analysis of an infinite variety of parts. As the reader will obtain a fuller comprehension of this idea, and of Edison's methods, by concrete illustration rather than by generalization, the authors have thought it well to select at random two typical instances of specific investigations out of the thousands that are scattered through the notebooks. These will be found in the following extracts from one of the note-books, and consist of Edison's instructions to be carried out in detail by his experimenters:
This careful attention to every little detail is a defining trait of Edison, not just in cost-effective manufacturing, but in every aspect of his work, whether it involves experimenting, researching, testing, or engineering. Following his intricate investigative paths found in the extensive laboratory notebooks leads to a tangled web of detailed searches aimed at uncovering the deepest secrets of nature through a thorough analysis of countless components. Since readers will better understand this concept and Edison's methods through specific examples rather than broad statements, the authors decided to randomly select two typical cases of particular investigations from the thousands scattered throughout the notebooks. These can be found in the following extracts from one of the notebooks, consisting of Edison's detailed instructions for his experimenters:
"Take, say, 25 lbs. hard Cuban asphalt and separate all the different hydrocarbons, etc., as far as possible by means of solvents. It will be necessary first to dissolve everything out by, say, hot turpentine, then successively treat the residue with bisulphide carbon, benzol, ether, chloroform, naphtha, toluol, alcohol, and other probable solvents. After you can go no further, distil off all the solvents so the asphalt material has a tar-like consistency. Be sure all the ash is out of the turpentine portion; now, after distilling the turpentine off, act on the residue with all the solvents that were used on the residue, using for the first the solvent which is least likely to dissolve a great part of it. By thus manipulating the various solvents you will be enabled probably to separate the crude asphalt into several distinct hydrocarbons. Put each in a bottle after it has been dried, and label the bottle with the process, etc., so we may be able to duplicate it; also give bottle a number and describe everything fully in note-book."
"Take about 25 lbs. of hard Cuban asphalt and separate all the different hydrocarbons as much as you can using solvents. First, dissolve everything with hot turpentine, then successively treat the leftover material with carbon disulfide, benzene, ether, chloroform, naphtha, toluene, alcohol, and other possible solvents. Once you can’t go any further, distill off all the solvents until the asphalt material has a tar-like consistency. Make sure all the ash is removed from the turpentine portion; after distilling off the turpentine, treat the residue with all the solvents used on it, starting with the one least likely to dissolve a large part of it. By carefully using the different solvents, you should be able to separate the crude asphalt into several distinct hydrocarbons. Put each one in a bottle after it has dried and label the bottle with the process details, so we can replicate it; also assign a number to the bottle and fully describe everything in a notebook."
"Destructively distil the following substances down to a point just short of carbonization, so that the residuum can be taken out of the retort, powdered, and acted on by all the solvents just as the asphalt in previous page. The distillation should be carried to, say, 600 degrees or 700 degrees Fahr., but not continued long enough to wholly reduce mass to charcoal, but always run to blackness. Separate the residuum in as many definite parts as possible, bottle and label, and keep accurate records as to process, weights, etc., so a reproduction of the experiment can at any time be made: Gelatine, 4 lbs.; asphalt, hard Cuban, 10 lbs.; coal-tar or pitch, 10 lbs.; wood-pitch, 10 lbs.; Syrian asphalt, 10 lbs.; bituminous coal, 10 lbs.; cane-sugar, 10 lbs.; glucose, 10 lbs.; dextrine, 10 lbs.; glycerine, 10 lbs.; tartaric acid, 5 lbs.; gum guiac, 5 lbs.; gum amber, 3 lbs.; gum tragacanth, 3 Lbs.; aniline red, 1 lb.; aniline oil, 1 lb.; crude anthracene, 5 lbs.; petroleum pitch, 10 lbs.; albumen from eggs, 2 lbs.; tar from passing chlorine through aniline oil, 2 lbs.; citric acid, 5 lbs.; sawdust of boxwood, 3 lbs.; starch, 5 lbs.; shellac, 3 lbs.; gum Arabic, 5 lbs.; castor oil, 5 lbs."
"Carefully distill the following substances until just before they turn to carbon, so you can remove the residue from the retort, grind it into a powder, and treat it with all the solvents like the asphalt mentioned on the previous page. The distillation should reach around 600 to 700 degrees Fahrenheit, but not be continued long enough to completely turn the material into charcoal; always aim for a blackened state. Separate the residue into as many distinct parts as possible, bottle and label them, and keep detailed records of the process, weights, etc., so that the experiment can be repeated at any time: Gelatine, 4 lbs.; hard Cuban asphalt, 10 lbs.; coal-tar or pitch, 10 lbs.; wood-pitch, 10 lbs.; Syrian asphalt, 10 lbs.; bituminous coal, 10 lbs.; cane-sugar, 10 lbs.; glucose, 10 lbs.; dextrine, 10 lbs.; glycerine, 10 lbs.; tartaric acid, 5 lbs.; gum guiac, 5 lbs.; gum amber, 3 lbs.; gum tragacanth, 3 lbs.; aniline red, 1 lb.; aniline oil, 1 lb.; crude anthracene, 5 lbs.; petroleum pitch, 10 lbs.; albumen from eggs, 2 lbs.; tar from passing chlorine through aniline oil, 2 lbs.; citric acid, 5 lbs.; sawdust of boxwood, 3 lbs.; starch, 5 lbs.; shellac, 3 lbs.; gum Arabic, 5 lbs.; castor oil, 5 lbs."
The empirical nature of his method will be apparent from an examination of the above items; but in pursuing it he leaves all uncertainty behind and, trusting nothing to theory, he acquires absolute knowledge. Whatever may be the mental processes by which he arrives at the starting-point of any specific line of research, the final results almost invariably prove that he does not plunge in at random; indeed, as an old associate remarked: "When Edison takes up any proposition in natural science, his perceptions seem to be elementally broad and analytical, that is to say, in addition to the knowledge he has acquired from books and observation, he appears to have an intuitive apprehension of the general order of things, as they might be supposed to exist in natural relation to each other. It has always seemed to me that he goes to the core of things at once."
The practical nature of his approach will be clear from looking at the items above; however, as he pursues it, he leaves all uncertainty behind, relying solely on empirical evidence to gain absolute knowledge. No matter what mental processes he uses to begin any specific research, the final outcomes almost always show that he doesn’t just dive in randomly. In fact, as an old colleague pointed out: "When Edison tackles any question in natural science, his understanding seems to be fundamentally broad and analytical. Besides the knowledge he’s gained from books and observation, he appears to have an intuitive grasp of how everything might naturally connect. It has always seemed to me that he gets to the essence of things right away."
Although nothing less than results from actual experiments are acceptable to him as established facts, this view of Edison may also account for his peculiar and somewhat weird ability to "guess" correctly, a faculty which has frequently enabled him to take short cuts to lines of investigation whose outcome has verified in a most remarkable degree statements apparently made offhand and without calculation. Mr. Upton says: "One of the main impressions left upon me, after knowing Mr. Edison for many years, is the marvellous accuracy of his guesses. He will see the general nature of a result long before it can be reached by mathematical calculation." This was supplemented by one of his engineering staff, who remarked: "Mr. Edison can guess better than a good many men can figure, and so far as my experience goes, I have found that he is almost invariably correct. His guess is more than a mere starting-point, and often turns out to be the final solution of a problem. I can only account for it by his remarkable insight and wonderful natural sense of the proportion of things, in addition to which he seems to carry in his head determining factors of all kinds, and has the ability to apply them instantly in considering any mechanical problem."
Although he only accepts results from actual experiments as established facts, this perspective on Edison might also explain his unusual and somewhat strange ability to "guess" correctly. This skill has often allowed him to shortcut to lines of inquiry, the outcomes of which have remarkably confirmed statements that seemed made offhand and without calculation. Mr. Upton says: "One of the main impressions I have after knowing Mr. Edison for many years is the incredible accuracy of his guesses. He can see the general nature of a result long before it can be determined through mathematical calculation." This was supported by a member of his engineering team, who noted: "Mr. Edison can guess better than many people can calculate, and based on my experience, I have found that he is almost always right. His guess goes beyond just a starting point; it often becomes the final solution to a problem. I can only explain it as his remarkable insight and natural understanding of proportions, plus he seems to keep a mental inventory of various determining factors and can apply them instantly to any mechanical problem."
While this mysterious intuitive power has been of the greatest advantage in connection with the vast number of technical problems that have entered into his life-work, there have been many remarkable instances in which it has seemed little less than prophecy, and it is deemed worth while to digress to the extent of relating two of them. One day in the summer of 1881, when the incandescent lamp-industry was still in swaddling clothes, Edison was seated in the room of Major Eaton, vice-president of the Edison Electric Light Company, talking over business matters, when Mr. Upton came in from the lamp factory at Menlo Park, and said: "Well, Mr. Edison, we completed a thousand lamps to-day." Edison looked up and said "Good," then relapsed into a thoughtful mood. In about two minutes he raised his head, and said: "Upton, in fifteen years you will be making forty thousand lamps a day." None of those present ventured to make any remark on this assertion, although all felt that it was merely a random guess, based on the sanguine dream of an inventor. The business had not then really made a start, and being entirely new was without precedent upon which to base any such statement, but, as a matter of fact, the records of the lamp factory show that in 1896 its daily output of lamps was actually about forty thousand.
While this mysterious intuitive ability has greatly helped in dealing with the numerous technical challenges throughout his career, there have been several incredible instances where it appeared almost prophetic. It's worth taking a moment to share two of these stories. One summer day in 1881, when the incandescent lamp industry was still in its infancy, Edison was in Major Eaton's office, the vice-president of the Edison Electric Light Company, discussing business matters. Mr. Upton then entered from the lamp factory in Menlo Park and said, "Well, Mr. Edison, we completed a thousand lamps today." Edison looked up and replied, "Good," then fell into a thoughtful silence. After about two minutes, he lifted his head and said, "Upton, in fifteen years, you will be making forty thousand lamps a day." No one present dared to comment on this claim, even though they all sensed it was just a wild guess driven by an optimistic inventor's vision. The business was still in its early stages and was entirely new, lacking any precedent to support such a statement. However, the actual records from the lamp factory show that by 1896, its daily output was indeed around forty thousand lamps.
The other instance referred to occurred shortly after the Edison Machine Works was moved up to Schenectady, in 1886. One day, when he was at the works, Edison sat down and wrote on a sheet of paper fifteen separate predictions of the growth and future of the electrical business. Notwithstanding the fact that the industry was then in an immature state, and that the great boom did not set in until a few years afterward, twelve of these predictions have been fully verified by the enormous growth and development in all branches of the art.
The other instance mentioned happened shortly after the Edison Machine Works relocated to Schenectady in 1886. One day, while he was at the factory, Edison sat down and wrote on a piece of paper fifteen different predictions about the growth and future of the electrical business. Even though the industry was still in its early stages and the big boom didn't start until a few years later, twelve of these predictions have been completely confirmed by the massive growth and progress in all areas of the field.
What the explanation of this gift, power, or intuition may be, is perhaps better left to the psychologist to speculate upon. If one were to ask Edison, he would probably say, "Hard work, not too much sleep, and free use of the imagination." Whether or not it would be possible for the average mortal to arrive at such perfection of "guessing" by faithfully following this formula, even reinforced by the Edison recipe for stimulating a slow imagination with pastry, is open for demonstration.
What the explanation of this gift, power, or intuition might be is probably better suited for psychologists to speculate on. If you asked Edison, he would likely say, "Hard work, not too much sleep, and a lot of imagination." Whether the average person could reach such a level of "guessing" by closely following this formula, even with Edison's tip for boosting a slow imagination with pastries, is still up for debate.
Somewhat allied to this curious faculty is another no less remarkable, and that is, the ability to point out instantly an error in a mass of reported experimental results. While many instances could be definitely named, a typical one, related by Mr. J. D. Flack, formerly master mechanic at the lamp factory, may be quoted: "During the many years of lamp experimentation, batches of lamps were sent to the photometer department for test, and Edison would examine the tabulated test sheets. He ran over every item of the tabulations rapidly, and, apparently without any calculation whatever, would check off errors as fast as he came to them, saying: 'You have made a mistake; try this one over.' In every case the second test proved that he was right. This wonderful aptitude for infallibly locating an error without an instant's hesitation for mental calculation, has always appealed to me very forcibly."
Somewhat related to this fascinating ability is another equally impressive one: the knack for quickly spotting mistakes in a pile of reported experimental results. While many examples could be given, a typical one shared by Mr. J. D. Flack, who used to be the master mechanic at the lamp factory, can be noted: "During the many years of lamp experimentation, batches of lamps were sent to the photometer department for testing, and Edison would look over the tabulated test sheets. He would skim through each item in the tables quickly, and, seemingly without any calculations, would identify errors as soon as he encountered them, saying: 'You've made a mistake; try this one again.' In every case, the second test confirmed he was right. This incredible ability to pinpoint errors without any hesitation for mental calculation has always impressed me greatly."
The ability to detect errors quickly in a series of experiments is one of the things that has enabled Edison to accomplish such a vast amount of work as the records show. Examples of the minuteness of detail into which his researches extend have already been mentioned, and as there are always a number of such investigations in progress at the laboratory, this ability stands Edison in good stead, for he is thus enabled to follow, and, if necessary, correct each one step by step. In this he is aided by the great powers of a mind that is able to free itself from absorbed concentration on the details of one problem, and instantly to shift over and become deeply and intelligently concentrated in another and entirely different one. For instance, he may have been busy for hours on chemical experiments, and be called upon suddenly to determine some mechanical questions. The complete and easy transition is the constant wonder of his associates, for there is no confusion of ideas resulting from these quick changes, no hesitation or apparent effort, but a plunge into the midst of the new subject, and an instant acquaintance with all its details, as if he had been studying it for hours.
The ability to quickly spot errors in a series of experiments is one of the key things that has allowed Edison to achieve so much, as the records show. Examples of the incredible detail involved in his research have already been mentioned, and since there are always several investigations happening in the lab, this skill serves Edison well. It allows him to track and, if needed, correct each experiment step by step. He benefits from a powerful mind that can shift focus easily, moving from being deeply immersed in one problem to becoming just as engaged with another completely different one. For instance, he might spend hours on chemical experiments and then suddenly be asked to tackle some mechanical questions. His ability to transition smoothly is a constant source of amazement for his colleagues; there’s no confusion or hesitation, no struggle—just a swift dive into the new topic and an immediate understanding of all its details, as if he had been studying it for hours.
A good stiff difficulty—one which may, perhaps, appear to be an unsurmountable obstacle—only serves to make Edison cheerful, and brings out variations of his methods in experimenting. Such an occurrence will start him thinking, which soon gives rise to a line of suggestions for approaching the trouble from various sides; or he will sit down and write out a series of eliminations, additions, or changes to be worked out and reported upon, with such variations as may suggest themselves during their progress. It is at such times as these that his unfailing patience and tremendous resourcefulness are in evidence. Ideas and expedients are poured forth in a torrent, and although some of them have temporarily appeared to the staff to be ridiculous or irrelevant, they have frequently turned out to be the ones leading to a correct solution of the trouble.
A tough challenge—one that might seem like an impossible hurdle—only makes Edison excited and sparks new ways for him to experiment. Such a situation gets him thinking, which often leads to a stream of ideas for tackling the issue from different angles; or he might sit down and outline a series of eliminations, additions, or changes to explore and report on, incorporating any variations that come up during the process. It’s during these moments that his endless patience and incredible resourcefulness really shine. Ideas and creative solutions flow rapidly, and even though some may seem silly or off-topic to the team at first, they often end up being the key to solving the problem.
Edison's inexhaustible resourcefulness and fertility of ideas have contributed largely to his great success, and have ever been a cause of amazement to those around him. Frequently, when it would seem to others that the extreme end of an apparently blind alley had been reached, and that it was impossible to proceed further, he has shown that there were several ways out of it. Examples without number could be quoted, but one must suffice by way of illustration. During the progress of the ore-milling work at Edison, it became desirable to carry on a certain operation by some special machinery. He requested the proper person on his engineering staff to think this matter up and submit a few sketches of what he would propose to do. He brought three drawings to Edison, who examined them and said none of them would answer. The engineer remarked that it was too bad, for there was no other way to do it. Mr. Edison turned to him quickly, and said: "Do you mean to say that these drawings represent the only way to do this work?" To which he received the reply: "I certainly do." Edison said nothing. This happened on a Saturday. He followed his usual custom of spending Sunday at home in Orange. When he returned to the works on Monday morning, he took with him sketches he had made, showing FORTY-EIGHT other ways of accomplishing the desired operation, and laid them on the engineer's desk without a word. Subsequently one of these ideas, with modifications suggested by some of the others, was put into successful practice.
Edison's endless creativity and wealth of ideas significantly contributed to his success and consistently amazed those around him. Often, when others believed they had hit a dead end, he demonstrated that there were multiple ways to move forward. Countless examples could be shared, but one will suffice for illustration. During the ore-milling work at Edison, it became necessary to carry out a specific operation with special machinery. He asked a member of his engineering team to come up with a solution and submit a few sketches of his proposals. The engineer presented three drawings to Edison, who examined them and said none would work. The engineer lamented that it was unfortunate, as there was no other way to do it. Mr. Edison quickly responded, "Are you saying these drawings are the only way to accomplish this task?" The engineer affirmed, "I certainly am." Edison remained silent. This occurred on a Saturday. He followed his usual routine of spending Sunday at home in Orange. Upon returning to work on Monday morning, he brought with him sketches showing FORTY-EIGHT other methods to achieve the desired operation and laid them on the engineer's desk without a word. Eventually, one of these ideas, with some modifications suggested by others, was successfully implemented.
Difficulties seem to have a peculiar charm for Edison, whether they relate to large or small things; and although the larger matters have contributed most to the history of the arts, the same carefulness of thought has often been the means of leading to improvements of permanent advantage even in minor details. For instance, in the very earliest days of electric lighting, the safe insulation of two bare wires fastened together was a serious problem that was solved by him. An iron pot over a fire, some insulating material melted therein, and narrow strips of linen drawn through it by means of a wooden clamp, furnished a readily applied and adhesive insulation, which was just as perfect for the purpose as the regular and now well-known insulating tape, of which it was the forerunner.
Difficulties seem to have a unique appeal for Edison, whether they're about big or small issues; and while the bigger challenges have had the most influence on the history of the arts, the same careful thinking has often led to lasting improvements even in smaller details. For example, in the very early days of electric lighting, figuring out how to safely insulate two bare wires that were connected was a serious challenge that he solved. An iron pot over a fire, some insulating material melted inside it, and narrow strips of linen pulled through it with a wooden clamp created a simple and effective insulation that was just as good for the job as the well-known insulating tape we have today, which it helped to pave the way for.
Dubious results are not tolerated for a moment in Edison's experimental work. Rather than pass upon an uncertainty, the experiment will be dissected and checked minutely in order to obtain absolute knowledge, pro and con. This searching method is followed not only in chemical or other investigations, into which complexities might naturally enter, but also in more mechanical questions, where simplicity of construction might naturally seem to preclude possibilities of uncertainty. For instance, at the time when he was making strenuous endeavors to obtain copper wire of high conductivity, strict laboratory tests were made of samples sent by manufacturers. One of these samples tested out poorer than a previous lot furnished from the same factory. A report of this to Edison brought the following note: "Perhaps the —— wire had a bad spot in it. Please cut it up into lengths and test each one and send results to me immediately." Possibly the electrical fraternity does not realize that this earnest work of Edison, twenty-eight years ago, resulted in the establishment of the high quality of copper wire that has been the recognized standard since that time. Says Edison on this point: "I furnished the expert and apparatus to the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company in 1883, and he is there yet. It was this expert and this company who pioneered high-conductivity copper for the electrical trade."
Dubious results are not tolerated for a moment in Edison's experimental work. Instead of accepting uncertainty, the experiment is thoroughly analyzed and checked in detail to gain absolute knowledge, both for and against. This meticulous approach is used not only in complex chemical investigations but also in more straightforward mechanical questions, where simplicity might suggest there shouldn't be any uncertainty. For example, when he was diligently trying to obtain high-conductivity copper wire, strict lab tests were conducted on samples sent by manufacturers. One of these samples tested worse than a previous batch from the same factory. When Edison was informed of this, he responded with a note saying, "Perhaps the —— wire had a defect. Please cut it into segments, test each one, and send the results to me immediately." The electrical community might not realize that Edison's dedicated efforts, twenty-eight years ago, established the high quality of copper wire that has been the recognized standard since then. Edison noted on this topic: "I provided the expert and equipment to the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company in 1883, and he is still there. It was this expert and this company that pioneered high-conductivity copper for the electrical industry."
Nor is it generally appreciated in the industry that the adoption of what is now regarded as a most obvious proposition—the high-economy incandescent lamp—was the result of that characteristic foresight which there has been occasion to mention frequently in the course of this narrative, together with the courage and "horse-sense" which have always been displayed by the inventor in his persistent pushing out with far-reaching ideas, in the face of pessimistic opinions. As is well known, the lamps of the first ten or twelve years of incandescent lighting were of low economy, but had long life. Edison's study of the subject had led him to the conviction that the greatest growth of the electric-lighting industry would be favored by a lamp taking less current, but having shorter, though commercially economical life; and after gradually making improvements along this line he developed, finally, a type of high-economy lamp which would introduce a most radical change in existing conditions, and lead ultimately to highly advantageous results. His start on this lamp, and an expressed desire to have it manufactured for regular use, filled even some of his business associates with dismay, for they could see nothing but disaster ahead in forcing such a lamp on the market. His persistence and profound conviction of the ultimate results were so strong and his arguments so sound, however, that the campaign was entered upon. Although it took two or three years to convince the public of the correctness of his views, the idea gradually took strong root, and has now become an integral principle of the business.
Nor is it commonly recognized in the industry that the acceptance of what is now seen as the obvious idea—the high-efficiency incandescent lamp—was driven by the foresight that has been mentioned often throughout this narrative, along with the courage and common sense that the inventor consistently showed by pushing forward with bold ideas despite negative opinions. It’s well known that the lamps from the first ten or twelve years of incandescent lighting were not efficient but had a long lifespan. Edison's exploration of the topic led him to believe that the biggest growth in the electric lighting industry would come from a lamp that used less electricity but had a shorter, yet commercially viable, lifespan. After gradually making improvements in this area, he eventually developed a type of high-efficiency lamp that would bring about significant changes in the existing market and lead to highly beneficial outcomes. His initiative to produce this lamp and his eagerness to have it manufactured for regular use left even some of his business partners worried, as they could only see potential failure in trying to sell such a lamp. However, his determination and strong belief in the eventual success, combined with solid reasoning, led to the launch of the campaign. Although it took two or three years to persuade the public of the validity of his ideas, the concept gradually gained strong acceptance and has now become a fundamental principle of the business.
In this connection it may be noted that with remarkable prescience Edison saw the coming of the modern lamps of to-day, which, by reason of their small consumption of energy to produce a given candle-power, have dismayed central-station managers. A few years ago a consumption of 3.1 watts per candle-power might safely be assumed as an excellent average, and many stations fixed their rates and business on such a basis. The results on income when the consumption, as in the new metallic-filament lamps, drops to 1.25 watts per candle can readily be imagined. Edison has insisted that central stations are selling light and not current; and he points to the predicament now confronting them as truth of his assertion that when selling light they share in all the benefits of improvement, but that when they sell current the consumer gets all those benefits without division. The dilemma is encountered by central stations in a bewildered way, as a novel and unexpected experience; but Edison foresaw the situation and warned against it long ago. It is one of the greatest gifts of statesmanship to see new social problems years before they arise and solve them in advance. It is one of the greatest attributes of invention to foresee and meet its own problems in exactly the same way.
In this regard, it's noteworthy that Edison, with remarkable foresight, anticipated the arrival of today's modern lamps, which, due to their low energy consumption for a given candle-power, have unsettled central-station managers. Just a few years ago, a consumption of 3.1 watts per candle-power was considered an excellent average, and many stations based their rates and operations on that assumption. The financial impact when consumption, as seen with the new metallic-filament lamps, drops to 1.25 watts per candle can easily be imagined. Edison has emphasized that central stations are selling light and not just electricity; he highlights the current challenge they face as proof of his claim that when selling light, they benefit from improvements, but when selling electricity, the consumer gets all those advantages without sharing. Central stations find themselves bewildered by this dilemma, as it is a novel and unexpected experience; however, Edison foresaw this situation and issued warnings about it long ago. One of the greatest gifts of leadership is to anticipate new social challenges long before they arise and to address them in advance. Similarly, one of the greatest traits of invention is to foresee and tackle its own challenges in the same way.
CHAPTER XXV
THE LABORATORY AT ORANGE AND THE STAFF
A LIVING interrogation-point and a born investigator from childhood, Edison has never been without a laboratory of some kind for upward of half a century.
A lively interrogation point and a natural investigator since childhood, Edison has always had some sort of laboratory for over fifty years.
In youthful years, as already described in this book, he became ardently interested in chemistry, and even at the early age of twelve felt the necessity for a special nook of his own, where he could satisfy his unconvinced mind of the correctness or inaccuracy of statements and experiments contained in the few technical books then at his command.
In his younger years, as mentioned earlier in this book, he became passionately interested in chemistry, and even at the young age of twelve, he felt the need for a little space of his own where he could explore and prove to himself whether the claims and experiments in the few technical books he had were right or wrong.
Ordinarily he was like other normal lads of his age—full of boyish, hearty enjoyments—but withal possessed of an unquenchable spirit of inquiry and an insatiable desire for knowledge. Being blessed with a wise and discerning mother, his aspirations were encouraged; and he was allowed a corner in her cellar. It is fair to offer tribute here to her bravery as well as to her wisdom, for at times she was in mortal terror lest the precocious experimenter below should, in his inexperience, make some awful combination that would explode and bring down the house in ruins on himself and the rest of the family.
Normally, he was like any other boy his age—full of youthful, hearty fun—but he also had an unquenchable curiosity and a never-ending thirst for knowledge. Thanks to his wise and insightful mother, his ambitions were supported, and he was given a spot in her cellar. It's important to acknowledge her bravery as much as her wisdom, because at times she was genuinely terrified that the young experimenter down below might, due to his inexperience, create some dangerous mix that could lead to an explosion and demolish the house along with him and the rest of the family.
Fortunately no such catastrophe happened, but young Edison worked away in his embryonic laboratory, satisfying his soul and incidentally depleting his limited pocket-money to the vanishing-point. It was, indeed, owing to this latter circumstance that in a year or two his aspirations necessitated an increase of revenue; and a consequent determination to earn some money for himself led to his first real commercial enterprise as "candy butcher" on the Grand Trunk Railroad, already mentioned in a previous chapter. It has also been related how his precious laboratory was transferred to the train; how he and it were subsequently expelled; and how it was re-established in his home, where he continued studies and experiments until the beginning of his career as a telegraph operator.
Fortunately, no such disaster occurred, but young Edison continued to work in his makeshift laboratory, fulfilling his passion and slowly draining his limited pocket money. In fact, it was because of this that within a year or two, he found himself needing to boost his income; this led to his first real business venture as a "candy butcher" on the Grand Trunk Railroad, which was mentioned in a previous chapter. It has also been noted how his precious laboratory was moved to the train, how he and it were eventually kicked off, and how it was reestablished at home, where he kept studying and experimenting until he started his career as a telegraph operator.
The nomadic life of the next few years did not lessen his devotion to study; but it stood seriously in the way of satisfying the ever-present craving for a laboratory. The lack of such a place never prevented experimentation, however, as long as he had a dollar in his pocket and some available "hole in the wall." With the turning of the tide of fortune that suddenly carried him, in New York in 1869, from poverty to the opulence of $300 a month, he drew nearer to a realization of his cherished ambition in having money, place, and some time (stolen from sleep) for more serious experimenting. Thus matters continued until, at about the age of twenty-two, Edison's inventions had brought him a relatively large sum of money, and he became a very busy manufacturer, and lessee of a large shop in Newark, New Jersey.
The nomadic lifestyle of those next few years didn't diminish his commitment to studying, but it made it tough to fulfill his constant desire for a laboratory. However, the absence of a proper space didn’t stop him from experimenting as long as he had a dollar in his pocket and some makeshift spot. With a sudden turn of fortune that lifted him from poverty to earning $300 a month in New York in 1869, he got closer to realizing his long-held dream of having money, a place, and some time (taken from sleep) for more serious experiments. This continued until, around the age of twenty-two, Edison's inventions had earned him quite a bit of money, and he became a very busy manufacturer and tenant of a large workshop in Newark, New Jersey.
Now, for the first time since leaving that boyish laboratory in the old home at Port Huron, Edison had a place of his own to work in, to think in; but no one in any way acquainted with Newark as a swarming centre of miscellaneous and multitudinous industries would recommend it as a cloistered retreat for brooding reverie and introspection, favorable to creative effort. Some people revel in surroundings of hustle and bustle, and find therein no hindrance to great accomplishment. The electrical genius of Newark is Edward Weston, who has thriven amid its turmoil and there has developed his beautiful instruments of precision; just as Brush worked out his arc-lighting system in Cleveland; or even as Faraday, surrounded by the din and roar of London, laid the intellectual foundations of the whole modern science of dynamic electricity. But Edison, though deaf, could not make too hurried a retreat from Newark to Menlo Park, where, as if to justify his change of base, vital inventions soon came thick and fast, year after year. The story of Menlo has been told in another chapter, but the point was not emphasized that Edison then, as later, tried hard to drop manufacturing. He would infinitely rather be philosopher than producer; but somehow the necessity of manufacturing is constantly thrust back upon him by a profound—perhaps finical—sense of dissatisfaction with what other people make for him. The world never saw a man more deeply and desperately convinced that nothing in it approaches perfection. Edison is the doctrine of evolution incarnate, applied to mechanics. As to the removal from Newark, he may be allowed to tell his own story: "I had a shop at Newark in which I manufactured stock tickers and such things. When I moved to Menlo Park I took out only the machinery that would be necessary for experimental purposes and left the manufacturing machinery in the place. It consisted of many milling machines and other tools for duplicating. I rented this to a man who had formerly been my bookkeeper, and who thought he could make money out of manufacturing. There was about $10,000 worth of machinery. He was to pay me $2000 a year for the rent of the machinery and keep it in good order. After I moved to Menlo Park, I was very busy with the telephone and phonograph, and I paid no attention to this little arrangement. About three years afterward, it occurred to me that I had not heard at all from the man who had rented this machinery, so I thought I would go over to Newark and see how things were going. When I got there, I found that instead of being a machine shop it was a hotel! I have since been utterly unable to find out what became of the man or the machinery." Such incidents tend to justify Edison in his rather cynical remark that he has always been able to improve machinery much quicker than men. All the way up he has had discouraging experiences. "One day while I was carrying on my work in Newark, a Wall Street broker came from the city and said he was tired of the 'Street,' and wanted to go into something real. He said he had plenty of money. He wanted some kind of a job to keep his mind off Wall Street. So we gave him a job as a 'mucker' in chemical experiments. The second night he was there he could not stand the long hours and fell asleep on a sofa. One of the boys took a bottle of bromine and opened it under the sofa. It floated up and produced a violent effect on the mucous membrane. The broker was taken with such a fit of coughing he burst a blood-vessel, and the man who let the bromine out got away and never came back. I suppose he thought there was going to be a death. But the broker lived, and left the next day; and I have never seen him since, either." Edison tells also of another foolhardy laboratory trick of the same kind: "Some of my assistants in those days were very green in the business, as I did not care whether they had had any experience or not. I generally tried to turn them loose. One day I got a new man, and told him to conduct a certain experiment. He got a quart of ether and started to boil it over a naked flame. Of course it caught fire. The flame was about four feet in diameter and eleven feet high. We had to call out the fire department; and they came down and put a stream through the window. That let all the fumes and chemicals out and overcame the firemen; and there was the devil to pay. Another time we experimented with a tub full of soapy water, and put hydrogen into it to make large bubbles. One of the boys, who was washing bottles in the place, had read in some book that hydrogen was explosive, so he proceeded to blow the tub up. There was about four inches of soap in the bottom of the tub, fourteen inches high; and he filled it with soap bubbles up to the brim. Then he took a bamboo fish-pole, put a piece of paper at the end, and touched it off. It blew every window out of the place."
Now, for the first time since leaving that boyish lab in his childhood home in Port Huron, Edison had a space of his own to work and think in. Yet, nobody familiar with Newark as a bustling hub of diverse industries would suggest it as a quiet getaway for deep thought and introspection conducive to creativity. Some people thrive in noisy, busy environments and find no barrier to achieving great things. The electrical pioneer of Newark is Edward Weston, who has thrived amid its chaos and developed beautiful precision instruments there, just as Brush created his arc-lighting system in Cleveland, or as Faraday laid the intellectual groundwork for modern dynamic electricity despite the noise and clamor of London. But Edison, despite being deaf, didn't hesitate to leave Newark for Menlo Park, where, to validate his new direction, vital inventions started to emerge quickly, year after year. The story of Menlo is discussed in another chapter; however, the key point that Edison, then and later, tried hard to move away from manufacturing wasn’t emphasized enough. He would much rather be a thinker than a manufacturer, but he often found himself forced into production by a deep—perhaps picky—sense of dissatisfaction with what others produced for him. No one has ever been more convinced that nothing in the world is perfect. Edison embodies the principle of evolution applied to mechanics. Regarding his move from Newark, he shared his own account: "I had a shop in Newark where I manufactured stock tickers and similar items. When I moved to Menlo Park, I took only the machinery I needed for experiments and left the manufacturing equipment behind. It included many milling machines and other tools for duplication. I rented this out to a man who used to be my bookkeeper, and who believed he could profit from manufacturing. There was about $10,000 worth of machinery. He was supposed to pay me $2,000 a year for the machinery rental and maintain it well. After I relocated to Menlo Park, I got busy with the telephone and phonograph, so I didn’t think much about this arrangement. About three years later, it dawned on me that I hadn’t heard from the guy renting the machinery, so I decided to check in on Newark to see how things were going. When I arrived, I found that instead of a machine shop, it was a hotel! Since then, I've been completely unable to find out what happened to the man or the machines." Such incidents justify Edison’s rather cynical observation that he has always been able to improve machinery far faster than people. Throughout his journey, he faced many discouraging experiences. "One day while I was working in Newark, a Wall Street broker came from the city saying he was tired of the 'Street' and wanted to get involved in something real. He claimed to have plenty of money and wanted a job to distract his mind from Wall Street. So we gave him a job as a 'mucker' in chemical experiments. On his second night there, he couldn’t handle the long hours and fell asleep on a sofa. One of the boys opened a bottle of bromine under the sofa. It floated up and caused a violent reaction in the mucous membrane. The broker started coughing uncontrollably and burst a blood vessel, and the guy who released the bromine disappeared and never returned. I guess he thought there was going to be a death. But the broker survived and left the following day, and I haven't seen him since." Edison also recounted another reckless lab incident: "Some of my assistants back then were very inexperienced, as I didn’t mind whether they had any prior experience or not. I usually let them work freely. One day I had a new guy who I told to run a certain experiment. He took a quart of ether and began boiling it over an open flame. Naturally, it caught fire. The flame spread to about four feet in diameter and reached eleven feet high. We had to call the fire department, and they arrived and directed water through the window. This let all the fumes and chemicals escape, which overwhelmed the firefighters, leading to chaos. On another occasion, we experimented with a tub full of soapy water, adding hydrogen to create large bubbles. One of the boys, who was washing bottles at the time, had read that hydrogen was explosive, so he tried to blow up the tub. It had about four inches of soap at the bottom and was fourteen inches tall; he filled it to the brim with soap bubbles. Then he took a bamboo fishing pole, put a piece of paper on the end, and lit it. It blew every window out of the place."
Always a shrewd, observant, and kindly critic of character, Edison tells many anecdotes of the men who gathered around him in various capacities at that quiet corner of New Jersey—Menlo Park—and later at Orange, in the Llewellyn Park laboratory; and these serve to supplement the main narrative by throwing vivid side-lights on the whole scene. Here, for example, is a picture drawn by Edison of a laboratory interlude—just a bit Rabelaisian: "When experimenting at Menlo Park we had all the way from forty to fifty men. They worked all the time. Each man was allowed from four to six hours' sleep. We had a man who kept tally, and when the time came for one to sleep, he was notified. At midnight we had lunch brought in and served at a long table at which the experimenters sat down. I also had an organ which I procured from Hilbourne Roosevelt—uncle of the ex-President—and we had a man play this organ while we ate our lunch. During the summertime, after we had made something which was successful, I used to engage a brick-sloop at Perth Amboy and take the whole crowd down to the fishing-banks on the Atlantic for two days. On one occasion we got outside Sandy Hook on the banks and anchored. A breeze came up, the sea became rough, and a large number of the men were sick. There was straw in the bottom of the boat, which we all slept on. Most of the men adjourned to this straw very sick. Those who were not got a piece of rancid salt pork from the skipper, and cut a large, thick slice out of it. This was put on the end of a fish-hook and drawn across the men's faces. The smell was terrific, and the effect added to the hilarity of the excursion.
Always a sharp, observant, and kind critic of character, Edison shares many stories about the men who gathered around him in various roles at that quiet corner of New Jersey—Menlo Park—and later at Orange, in the Llewellyn Park laboratory. These anecdotes add depth to the main narrative by providing vivid insights into the whole scene. For example, Edison describes a laboratory moment—just a bit Rabelaisian: "When we were experimenting at Menlo Park, we had between forty and fifty men working all the time. Each person was allowed four to six hours of sleep. We had someone keeping track, and when it was time for someone to sleep, he would be notified. At midnight, we had lunch brought in and served at a long table where the experimenters sat down. I also had an organ that I got from Hilbourne Roosevelt—an uncle of the ex-President—and we had someone play this organ while we ate our lunch. In the summertime, after we achieved something successful, I used to rent a small boat at Perth Amboy and take the whole crew down to the fishing banks on the Atlantic for two days. Once, we got outside Sandy Hook on the banks and dropped anchor. A breeze picked up, the sea became rough, and many of the men got seasick. There was straw in the bottom of the boat, where we all slept. Most of the men who felt sick ended up on this straw. Those who weren't sick got a piece of rancid salt pork from the captain and cut a large, thick slice from it. They would put this on the end of a fishhook and drag it across the faces of their fellow crew members. The smell was awful, and the extra chaos added to the fun of the trip."
"I went down once with my father and two assistants for a little fishing inside Sandy Hook. For some reason or other the fishing was very poor. We anchored, and I started in to fish. After fishing for several hours there was not a single bite. The others wanted to pull up anchor, but I fished two days and two nights without a bite, until they pulled up anchor and went away. I would not give up. I was going to catch that fish if it took a week."
"I went out once with my dad and two helpers to do some fishing inside Sandy Hook. For some reason, the fishing was really bad. We dropped anchor, and I started fishing. After several hours, I hadn't gotten a single bite. The others wanted to leave, but I fished for two days and two nights without a bite, until they finally pulled up anchor and left. I refused to give up. I was determined to catch that fish, even if it took a week."
This is general. Let us quote one or two piquant personal observations of a more specific nature as to the odd characters Edison drew around him in his experimenting. "Down at Menlo Park a man came in one day and wanted a job. He was a sailor. I hadn't any particular work to give him, but I had a number of small induction coils, and to give him something to do I told him to fix them up and sell them among his sailor friends. They were fixed up, and he went over to New York and sold them all. He was an extraordinary fellow. His name was Adams. One day I asked him how long it was since he had been to sea, and he replied two or three years. I asked him how he had made a living in the mean time, before he came to Menlo Park. He said he made a pretty good living by going around to different clinics and getting $10 at each clinic, because of having the worst case of heart-disease on record. I told him if that was the case he would have to be very careful around the laboratory. I had him there to help in experimenting, and the heart-disease did not seem to bother him at all.
This is general. Let’s share a couple of interesting personal stories about the unusual characters Edison had around him during his experiments. "Down at Menlo Park, a guy came in one day looking for a job. He was a sailor. I didn’t have any specific work to offer him, but I had a bunch of small induction coils, so to give him something to do, I told him to fix them up and sell them to his sailor friends. He fixed them and went over to New York and sold them all. He was quite an extraordinary guy. His name was Adams. One day, I asked him how long it had been since he’d been at sea, and he said two or three years. I asked how he’d made a living in the meantime, before he came to Menlo Park. He said he made a pretty good living going around to different clinics, collecting $10 at each one, because he had the worst case of heart disease on record. I told him that if that was true, he’d need to be very careful in the lab. I had him there to help with the experiments, and the heart disease didn’t seem to bother him at all.
"It appeared that he had once been a slaver; and altogether he was a tough character. Having no other man I could spare at that time, I sent him over with my carbon transmitter telephone to exhibit it in England. It was exhibited before the Post-Office authorities. Professor Hughes spent an afternoon in examining the apparatus, and in about a month came out with his microphone, which was absolutely nothing more nor less than my exact invention. But no mention was made of the fact that, just previously, he had seen the whole of my apparatus. Adams stayed over in Europe connected with the telephone for several years, and finally died of too much whiskey—but not of heart-disease. This shows how whiskey is the more dangerous of the two.
"It seemed that he used to be a slaver, and overall he was a tough guy. Since I couldn’t spare anyone else at the time, I sent him over with my carbon transmitter telephone to showcase it in England. It was displayed in front of the Post-Office authorities. Professor Hughes spent an afternoon examining the device, and about a month later, he came out with his microphone, which was basically my exact invention. However, there was no mention of the fact that he had just seen my entire apparatus. Adams stayed in Europe working with the telephone for several years and eventually died from too much whiskey—but not from heart disease. This demonstrates how whiskey is the more dangerous of the two."
"Adams said that at one time he was aboard a coffee-ship in the harbor of Santos, Brazil. He fell down a hatchway and broke his arm. They took him up to the hospital—a Portuguese one—where he could not speak the language, and they did not understand English. They treated him for two weeks for yellow fever! He was certainly the most profane man we ever had around the laboratory. He stood high in his class."
"Adams mentioned that at one point he was on a coffee ship in the harbor of Santos, Brazil. He fell down a hatch and broke his arm. They took him to a hospital—a Portuguese one—where he couldn't speak the language, and they didn't understand English. They treated him for two weeks for yellow fever! He was definitely the most foul-mouthed person we ever had in the lab. He ranked high in his class."
And there were others of a different stripe. "We had a man with us at Menlo called Segredor. He was a queer kind of fellow. The men got in the habit of plaguing him; and, finally, one day he said to the assembled experimenters in the top room of the laboratory: 'The next man that does it, I will kill him.' They paid no attention to this, and next day one of them made some sarcastic remark to him. Segredor made a start for his boarding-house, and when they saw him coming back up the hill with a gun, they knew there would be trouble, so they all made for the woods. One of the men went back and mollified him. He returned to his work; but he was not teased any more. At last, when I sent men out hunting for bamboo, I dispatched Segredor to Cuba. He arrived in Havana on Tuesday, and on the Friday following he was buried, having died of the black vomit. On the receipt of the news of his death, half a dozen of the men wanted his job, but my searcher in the Astor Library reported that the chances of finding the right kind of bamboo for lamps in Cuba were very small; so I did not send a substitute."
And there were others who were different. "We had a guy with us at Menlo named Segredor. He was a strange sort of person. The men started bothering him a lot, and finally one day he said to everyone gathered in the top room of the lab: 'The next person who does it, I’ll kill them.' They didn’t pay any attention to him, and the next day one of them made a sarcastic comment to him. Segredor headed for his boarding house, and when they saw him coming back up the hill with a gun, they knew there would be trouble, so they all ran into the woods. One of the guys went back and smoothed things over with him. He went back to work, but he wasn't teased anymore. Eventually, when I sent guys out to hunt for bamboo, I sent Segredor to Cuba. He got to Havana on Tuesday, and by that Friday, he was buried, having died from the black vomit. When we heard about his death, half a dozen of the guys wanted his job, but my researcher at the Astor Library said that the chances of finding the right kind of bamboo for lamps in Cuba were very slim, so I didn’t send a replacement."
Another thumb-nail sketch made of one of his associates is this: "When experimenting with vacuum-pumps to exhaust the incandescent lamps, I required some very delicate and close manipulation of glass, and hired a German glass-blower who was said to be the most expert man of his kind in the United States. He was the only one who could make clinical thermometers. He was the most extraordinarily conceited man I have ever come across. His conceit was so enormous, life was made a burden to him by all the boys around the laboratory. He once said that he was educated in a university where all the students belonged to families of the aristocracy; and the highest class in the university all wore little red caps. He said HE wore one."
Another brief description of one of his associates goes like this: "When I was experimenting with vacuum pumps to empty the incandescent lamps, I needed very precise and careful handling of glass, so I hired a German glassblower who was said to be the best in the United States. He was the only one who could make clinical thermometers. He was the most incredibly arrogant person I've ever met. His arrogance was so extreme that it made life difficult for him with all the guys in the lab. He once claimed that he was educated at a university where all the students came from aristocratic families; and the top students at the university all wore little red caps. He said HE wore one."
Of somewhat different caliber was "honest" John Kruesi, who first made his mark at Menlo Park, and of whom Edison says: "One of the workmen I had at Menlo Park was John Kruesi, who afterward became, from his experience, engineer of the lighting station, and subsequently engineer of the Edison General Electric Works at Schenectady. Kruesi was very exact in his expressions. At the time we were promoting and putting up electric-light stations in Pennsylvania, New York, and New England, there would be delegations of different people who proposed to pay for these stations. They would come to our office in New York, at '65,' to talk over the specifications, the cost, and other things. At first, Mr. Kruesi was brought in, but whenever a statement was made which he could not understand or did not believe could be substantiated, he would blurt right out among these prospects that he didn't believe it. Finally it disturbed these committees so much, and raised so many doubts in their minds, that one of my chief associates said: 'Here, Kruesi, we don't want you to come to these meetings any longer. You are too painfully honest.' I said to him: 'We always tell the truth. It may be deferred truth, but it is the truth.' He could not understand that."
Of a somewhat different level was "honest" John Kruesi, who first made a name for himself at Menlo Park. Edison noted: "One of the workers I had at Menlo Park was John Kruesi, who later became the engineer of the lighting station due to his experience, and subsequently the engineer of the Edison General Electric Works in Schenectady. Kruesi was very precise in his words. During the time we were promoting and setting up electric-light stations in Pennsylvania, New York, and New England, various groups of people came to propose funding for these stations. They would visit our office in New York at '65' to discuss the specifications, costs, and other details. Initially, Mr. Kruesi would join us, but whenever a statement was made that he couldn’t comprehend or believed was unverified, he would assertively declare to these prospects that he didn’t believe it. Eventually, this made the committees quite uncomfortable and raised many doubts in their minds, to the point that one of my main associates said: 'Look, Kruesi, we don’t want you to attend these meetings anymore. You’re too painfully honest.' I told him: 'We always stick to the truth. It may be a delayed truth, but it’s the truth.' He couldn’t grasp that."
Various reasons conspired to cause the departure from Menlo Park midway in the eighties. For Edison, in spite of the achievement with which its name will forever be connected, it had lost all its attractions and all its possibilities. It had been outgrown in many ways, and strange as the remark may seem, it was not until he had left it behind and had settled in Orange, New Jersey, that he can be said to have given definite shape to his life. He was only forty in 1887, and all that he had done up to that time, tremendous as much of it was, had worn a haphazard, Bohemian air, with all the inconsequential freedom and crudeness somehow attaching to pioneer life. The development of the new laboratory in West Orange, just at the foot of Llewellyn Park, on the Orange Mountains, not only marked the happy beginning of a period of perfect domestic and family life, but saw in the planning and equipment of a model laboratory plant the consummation of youthful dreams, and of the keen desire to enjoy resources adequate at any moment to whatever strain the fierce fervor of research might put upon them. Curiously enough, while hitherto Edison had sought to dissociate his experimenting from his manufacturing, here he determined to develop a large industry to which a thoroughly practical laboratory would be a central feature, and ever a source of suggestion and inspiration. Edison's standpoint to-day is that an evil to be dreaded in manufacture is that of over-standardization, and that as soon as an article is perfect that is the time to begin improving it. But he who would improve must experiment.
Various reasons led to leaving Menlo Park in the mid-eighties. For Edison, despite the achievements he's forever associated with, it had lost its appeal and potential. He had outgrown it in many ways, and as strange as it sounds, it wasn't until he moved on and settled in Orange, New Jersey, that he truly shaped his life. He was only forty in 1887, and everything he had done up to that point, impressive as it was, had a careless, Bohemian vibe, filled with the random freedom and roughness of pioneer life. The new laboratory in West Orange, right at the base of Llewellyn Park on the Orange Mountains, not only marked the joyful start of a perfect family life but also represented the realization of youthful dreams, showing his strong desire for resources that could handle the intense demands of research at any time. Interestingly, while Edison had previously tried to separate his experimentation from his manufacturing, he decided here to create a large industry where a fully functional lab would be a central feature, constantly providing ideas and inspiration. Edison's current view is that a significant risk in manufacturing is over-standardization, and that the moment an item becomes perfect is when you should start improving it. But those who wish to improve must experiment.
The Orange laboratory, as originally planned, consisted of a main building two hundred and fifty feet long and three stories in height, together with four other structures, each one hundred by twenty-five feet, and only one story in height. All these were substantially built of brick. The main building was divided into five chief divisions—the library, office, machine shops, experimental and chemical rooms, and stock-room. The use of the smaller buildings will be presently indicated.
The Orange laboratory, as initially designed, featured a main building that was two hundred fifty feet long and three stories tall, along with four other buildings, each one hundred by twenty-five feet and just one story high. All of these were solidly constructed from brick. The main building was divided into five primary sections—the library, office, machine shops, experimental and chemical rooms, and stockroom. The purposes of the smaller buildings will be explained shortly.
Surrounding the whole was erected a high picket fence with a gate placed on Valley Road. At this point a gate-house was provided and put in charge of a keeper, for then, as at the present time, Edison was greatly sought after; and, in order to accomplish any work at all, he was obliged to deny himself to all but the most important callers. The keeper of the gate was usually chosen with reference to his capacity for stony-hearted implacability and adherence to instructions; and this choice was admirably made in one instance when a new gateman, not yet thoroughly initiated, refused admittance to Edison himself. It was of no use to try and explain. To the gateman EVERY ONE was persona non grata without proper credentials, and Edison had to wait outside until he could get some one to identify him.
Surrounding the entire property was a tall picket fence with a gate on Valley Road. At this entrance, there was a gatehouse managed by a keeper, because, just like today, Edison was in high demand. To be able to focus on his work, he had to turn away everyone except for the most crucial visitors. The gatekeeper was typically selected for his ability to be unyielding and follow orders, and this choice was particularly effective in one case when a new gatekeeper, not yet fully trained, denied entry to Edison himself. Trying to explain was pointless. To the gatekeeper, EVERYONE was unwelcome without the right credentials, and Edison had to wait outside until he could find someone to vouch for him.
On entering the main building the first doorway from the ample passage leads the visitor into a handsome library finished throughout in yellow pine, occupying the entire width of the building, and almost as broad as long. The centre of this spacious room is an open rectangular space about forty by twenty-five feet, rising clear about forty feet from the main floor to a panelled ceiling. Around the sides of the room, bounding this open space, run two tiers of gallery, divided, as is the main floor beneath them; into alcoves of liberal dimensions. These alcoves are formed by racks extending from floor to ceiling, fitted with shelves, except on two sides of both galleries, where they are formed by a series of glass-fronted cabinets containing extensive collections of curious and beautiful mineralogical and geological specimens, among which is the notable Tiffany-Kunz collection of minerals acquired by Edison some years ago. Here and there in these cabinets may also be found a few models which he has used at times in his studies of anatomy and physiology.
Upon entering the main building, the first doorway from the spacious hallway takes the visitor into a beautiful library finished in yellow pine, which spans the entire width of the building and is almost as wide as it is long. The center of this large room is an open rectangular area about forty by twenty-five feet, rising about forty feet from the main floor to a paneled ceiling. Along the sides of the room, surrounding this open space, are two tiers of gallery, divided like the main floor underneath them into generously sized alcoves. These alcoves are created by racks extending from floor to ceiling, equipped with shelves, except on two sides of both galleries, where they are formed by a series of glass-fronted cabinets containing extensive collections of interesting and beautiful mineralogical and geological specimens, including the well-known Tiffany-Kunz collection of minerals that Edison acquired years ago. Here and there in these cabinets, you can also find a few models he has used in his studies of anatomy and physiology.
The shelves on the remainder of the upper gallery and part of those on the first gallery are filled with countless thousands of specimens of ores and minerals of every conceivable kind gathered from all parts of the world, and all tagged and numbered. The remaining shelves of the first gallery are filled with current numbers (and some back numbers) of the numerous periodicals to which Edison subscribes. Here may be found the popular magazines, together with those of a technical nature relating to electricity, chemistry, engineering, mechanics, building, cement, building materials, drugs, water and gas, power, automobiles, railroads, aeronautics, philosophy, hygiene, physics, telegraphy, mining, metallurgy, metals, music, and others; also theatrical weeklies, as well as the proceedings and transactions of various learned and technical societies.
The shelves on the rest of the upper gallery and part of those on the first gallery are packed with countless specimens of ores and minerals from all over the world, all tagged and numbered. The remaining shelves in the first gallery are stocked with current issues (and some past issues) of the many periodicals that Edison subscribes to. Here, you can find popular magazines alongside technical publications covering topics like electricity, chemistry, engineering, mechanics, construction, cement, building materials, pharmaceuticals, water and gas, power, automobiles, railroads, aeronautics, philosophy, hygiene, physics, telegraphy, mining, metallurgy, metals, music, and more; as well as theater weeklies and the proceedings of various professional and technical societies.
The first impression received as one enters on the main floor of the library and looks around is that of noble proportions and symmetry as a whole. The open central space of liberal dimensions and height, flanked by the galleries and relieved by four handsome electric-lighting fixtures suspended from the ceiling by long chains, conveys an idea of lofty spaciousness; while the huge open fireplace, surmounted by a great clock built into the wall, at one end of the room, the large rugs, the arm-chairs scattered around, the tables and chairs in the alcoves, give a general air of comfort combined with utility. In one of the larger alcoves, at the sunny end of the main hall, is Edison's own desk, where he may usually be seen for a while in the early morning hours looking over his mail or otherwise busily working on matters requiring his attention.
The first impression you get when you enter the main floor of the library and look around is one of impressive proportions and symmetry. The open central space, which is spacious and tall, is bordered by galleries and features four beautiful electric light fixtures hanging from the ceiling by long chains, giving a sense of grand openness. At one end of the room, a large open fireplace topped with a big clock built into the wall, along with large rugs, scattered armchairs, and tables and chairs in the alcoves, creates an overall feeling of comfort combined with functionality. In one of the larger alcoves, at the sunny end of the main hall, is Edison's own desk, where he can often be found in the early morning hours, reviewing his mail or working on other important tasks that need his attention.
At the opposite end of the room, not far from the open fireplace, is a long table surrounded by swivel desk-chairs. It is here that directors' meetings are sometimes held, and also where weighty matters are often discussed by Edison at conference with his closer associates. It has been the privilege of the writers to be present at some of these conferences, not only as participants, but in some cases as lookers-on while awaiting their turn. On such occasions an interesting opportunity is offered to study Edison in his intense and constructive moods. Apparently oblivious to everything else, he will listen with concentrated mind and close attention, and then pour forth a perfect torrent of ideas and plans, and, if the occasion calls for it, will turn around to the table, seize a writing-pad and make sketch after sketch with lightning-like rapidity, tearing off each sheet as filled and tossing it aside to the floor. It is an ordinary indication that there has been an interesting meeting when the caretaker about fills a waste-basket with these discarded sketches.
At the far end of the room, near the open fireplace, there’s a long table surrounded by swivel chairs. This is where directors' meetings sometimes take place, and where Edison often discusses important matters with his close associates. The writers have had the chance to attend some of these discussions, not only as participants but also at times as observers while they wait for their turn. These moments provide a unique opportunity to watch Edison in his focused and creative states. Completely absorbed in what’s happening, he listens intently and then unleashes a flood of ideas and plans. When needed, he’ll turn to the table, grab a writing pad, and quickly sketch out one idea after another, tossing each filled sheet to the floor. It’s a clear sign that an engaging meeting has occurred when the caretaker nearly fills a wastebasket with these discarded sketches.
Directly opposite the main door is a beautiful marble statue purchased by Edison at the Paris Exposition in 1889, on the occasion of his visit there. The statue, mounted on a base three feet high, is an allegorical representation of the supremacy of electric light over all other forms of illumination, carried out by the life-size figure of a youth with half-spread wings seated upon the ruins of a street gas-lamp, holding triumphantly high above his head an electric incandescent lamp. Grouped about his feet are a gear-wheel, voltaic pile, telegraph key, and telephone. This work of art was executed by A. Bordiga, of Rome, held a prominent place in the department devoted to Italian art at the Paris Exposition, and naturally appealed to Edison as soon as he saw it.
Directly opposite the main door is a stunning marble statue that Edison bought at the Paris Exposition in 1889 during his visit. The statue, set on a three-foot-high base, symbolizes the dominance of electric light over all other forms of illumination, depicted by a life-size figure of a young man with half-spread wings sitting on the ruins of a street gas lamp, triumphantly holding an electric incandescent lamp high above his head. At his feet are a gear wheel, a voltaic pile, a telegraph key, and a telephone. This artwork was created by A. Bordiga from Rome, featured prominently in the section dedicated to Italian art at the Paris Exposition, and immediately caught Edison’s attention when he saw it.
In the middle distance, between the entrance door and this statue, has long stood a magnificent palm, but at the present writing it has been set aside to give place to a fine model of the first type of the Edison poured cement house, which stands in a miniature artificial lawn upon a special table prepared for it; while on the floor at the foot of the table are specimens of the full-size molds in which the house will be cast.
In the distance, between the entrance door and this statue, there used to be a beautiful palm tree, but now it’s been replaced with a great model of the original Edison poured cement house, which sits on a small artificial lawn on a special table made for it; at the base of the table, there are examples of the full-size molds that will be used to cast the house.
The balustrades of the galleries and all other available places are filled with portraits of great scientists and men of achievement, as well as with pictures of historic and scientific interest. Over the fireplace hangs a large photograph showing the Edison cement plant in its entire length, flanked on one end of the mantel by a bust of Humboldt, and on the other by a statuette of Sandow, the latter having been presented to Edison by the celebrated athlete after the visit he made to Orange to pose for the motion pictures in the earliest days of their development. On looking up under the second gallery at this end is seen a great roll resting in sockets placed on each side of the room. This is a huge screen or curtain which may be drawn down to the floor to provide a means of projection for lantern slides or motion pictures, for the entertainment or instruction of Edison and his guests. In one of the larger alcoves is a large terrestrial globe pivoted in its special stand, together with a relief map of the United States; and here and there are handsomely mounted specimens of underground conductors and electric welds that were made at the Edison Machine Works at Schenectady before it was merged into the General Electric Company. On two pedestals stand, respectively, two other mementoes of the works, one a fifteen-light dynamo of the Edison type, and the other an elaborate electric fan—both of them gifts from associates or employees.
The railings of the galleries and all the other available spots are adorned with portraits of great scientists and accomplished individuals, along with images of historical and scientific significance. Over the fireplace, there’s a large photo of the Edison cement plant in its entirety, with a bust of Humboldt on one end of the mantel and a statuette of Sandow on the other. The latter was given to Edison by the famous athlete after he visited Orange to pose for motion pictures in the early days of their development. Looking up under the second gallery at this end, you can see a large roll resting in sockets on each side of the room. This is a massive screen or curtain that can be pulled down to the floor for projecting lantern slides or motion pictures, for the entertainment or education of Edison and his guests. In one of the larger alcoves, there’s a large terrestrial globe on its own stand, along with a relief map of the United States. Scattered around are elegantly displayed specimens of underground conductors and electric welds made at the Edison Machine Works in Schenectady before it became part of the General Electric Company. On two pedestals stand, respectively, two other mementoes from the works: one is a fifteen-light dynamo of the Edison type, and the other is an elaborate electric fan—both gifts from associates or employees.
In noting these various objects of interest one must not lose sight of the fact that this part of the building is primarily a library, if indeed that fact did not at once impress itself by a glance at the well-filled unglazed book-shelves in the alcoves of the main floor. Here Edison's catholic taste in reading becomes apparent as one scans the titles of thousands of volumes ranged upon the shelves, for they include astronomy, botany, chemistry, dynamics, electricity, engineering, forestry, geology, geography, mechanics, mining, medicine, metallurgy, magnetism, philosophy, psychology, physics, steam, steam-engines, telegraphy, telephony, and many others. Besides these there are the journals and proceedings of numerous technical societies; encyclopaedias of various kinds; bound series of important technical magazines; a collection of United States and foreign patents, embracing some hundreds of volumes, together with an extensive assortment of miscellaneous books of special and general interest. There is another big library up in the house on the hill—in fact, there are books upon books all over the home. And wherever they are, those books are read.
In highlighting these various points of interest, we must remember that this part of the building is primarily a library, which is evident from just a glance at the well-stocked, unglazed bookshelves in the alcoves on the main floor. Here, Edison’s broad reading preferences become clear as you look over the titles of thousands of volumes lined up on the shelves, covering topics like astronomy, botany, chemistry, dynamics, electricity, engineering, forestry, geology, geography, mechanics, mining, medicine, metallurgy, magnetism, philosophy, psychology, physics, steam, steam engines, telegraphy, telephony, and many others. In addition to these, there are journals and proceedings from various technical societies, encyclopedias of different kinds, complete runs of important technical magazines, a collection of U.S. and foreign patents that spans hundreds of volumes, along with a wide range of miscellaneous books of both specific and general interest. There’s another large library in the house on the hill—actually, there are books upon books throughout the home. And wherever they are, those books are being read.
As one is about to pass out of the library attention is arrested by an incongruity in the form of a cot, which stands in an alcove near the door. Here Edison, throwing himself down, sometimes seeks a short rest during specially long working tours. Sleep is practically instantaneous and profound, and he awakes in immediate and full possession of his faculties, arising from the cot and going directly "back to the job" without a moment's hesitation, just as a person wide awake would arise from a chair and proceed to attend to something previously determined upon.
As you’re about to leave the library, you can’t help but notice something unusual: a cot sitting in a nook near the door. Edison often throws himself down on it to catch a quick rest during particularly long work sessions. His sleep is almost instantaneous and deep, and he wakes up fully alert, getting up from the cot and going straight "back to the job" without a second’s pause, just like someone who's fully awake would get up from a chair and resume whatever they were doing before.
Immediately outside the library is the famous stock-room, about which much has been written and invented. Its fame arose from the fact that Edison planned it to be a repository of some quantity, great or small, of every known and possibly useful substance not readily perishable, together with the most complete assortment of chemicals and drugs that experience and knowledge could suggest. Always strenuous in his experimentation, and the living embodiment of the spirit of the song, I Want What I Want When I Want It, Edison had known for years what it was to be obliged to wait, and sometimes lack, for some substance or chemical that he thought necessary to the success of an experiment. Naturally impatient at any delay which interposed in his insistent and searching methods, and realizing the necessity of maintaining the inspiration attending his work at any time, he determined to have within his immediate reach the natural resources of the world.
Right outside the library is the famous stock room, which has been the subject of much writing and invention. Its fame comes from the fact that Edison designed it to hold a quantity, whether big or small, of every known and potentially useful substance that doesn't spoil easily, along with a complete range of chemicals and drugs that experience and knowledge could recommend. Always vigorous in his experiments, and truly embodying the spirit of the saying, "I Want What I Want When I Want It," Edison had learned over the years what it felt like to wait and sometimes miss out on a substance or chemical he believed was essential for the success of his experiments. Naturally impatient with any delay that interfered with his persistent and thorough methods, and recognizing the need to keep the inspiration flowing in his work, he decided to have the world's natural resources readily available to him.
Hence it is not surprising to find the stock-room not only a museum, but a sample-room of nature, as well as a supply department. To a casual visitor the first view of this heterogeneous collection is quite bewildering, but on more mature examination it resolves itself into a natural classification—as, for instance, objects pertaining to various animals, birds, and fishes, such as skins, hides, hair, fur, feathers, wool, quills, down, bristles, teeth, bones, hoofs, horns, tusks, shells; natural products, such as woods, barks, roots, leaves, nuts, seeds, herbs, gums, grains, flours, meals, bran; also minerals in great assortment; mineral and vegetable oils, clay, mica, ozokerite, etc. In the line of textiles, cotton and silk threads in great variety, with woven goods of all kinds from cheese-cloth to silk plush. As for paper, there is everything in white and colored, from thinnest tissue up to the heaviest asbestos, even a few newspapers being always on hand. Twines of all sizes, inks, waxes, cork, tar, resin, pitch, turpentine, asphalt, plumbago, glass in sheets and tubes; and a host of miscellaneous articles revealed on looking around the shelves, as well as an interminable collection of chemicals, including acids, alkalies, salts, reagents, every conceivable essential oil and all the thinkable extracts. It may be remarked that this collection includes the eighteen hundred or more fluorescent salts made by Edison during his experimental search for the best material for a fluoroscope in the initial X-ray period. All known metals in form of sheet, rod and tube, and of great variety in thickness, are here found also, together with a most complete assortment of tools and accessories for machine shop and laboratory work.
It’s no surprise to find the stockroom is not only a museum but also a sample room of nature and a supply department. At first glance, this mixed collection can seem overwhelming, but a closer look reveals a natural classification—objects related to various animals, birds, and fish, like skins, hides, hair, fur, feathers, wool, quills, down, bristles, teeth, bones, hooves, horns, tusks, and shells; natural products like woods, barks, roots, leaves, nuts, seeds, herbs, gums, grains, flours, meals, and bran; a wide variety of minerals; as well as mineral and plant oils, clay, mica, ozokerite, etc. In textiles, there’s a great variety of cotton and silk threads, along with woven goods ranging from cheesecloth to silk plush. The paper selection includes everything from the thinnest tissue to heavy asbestos, with a few newspapers always available. There are twines in all sizes, inks, waxes, cork, tar, resin, pitch, turpentine, asphalt, plumbago, glass in sheets and tubes; along with countless miscellaneous items found on the shelves, and an endless collection of chemicals—including acids, bases, salts, reagents, every type of essential oil and all imaginable extracts. This collection also features the eighteen hundred or more fluorescent salts that Edison created during his experimental search for the best material for a fluoroscope in the early X-ray period. All known metals are available in the form of sheets, rods, and tubes, in various thicknesses, along with a comprehensive assortment of tools and accessories for machine shop and lab work.
The list is confined to the merest general mention of the scope of this remarkable and interesting collection, as specific details would stretch out into a catalogue of no small proportions. When it is stated, however, that a stock clerk is kept exceedingly busy all day answering the numerous and various demands upon him, the reader will appreciate that this comprehensive assortment is not merely a fad of Edison's, but stands rather as a substantial tribute to his wide-angled view of possible requirements as his various investigations take him far afield. It has no counterpart in the world!
The list only gives a brief overview of this amazing and fascinating collection, as specific details would create a lengthy catalog. However, when it’s mentioned that a stock clerk is kept extremely busy all day responding to the many different requests he receives, readers will understand that this extensive assortment is not just a whim of Edison's; it genuinely reflects his broad perspective on potential needs as his various investigations lead him into diverse areas. There's nothing else like it in the world!
Beyond the stock-room, and occupying about half the building on the same floor, lie a machine shop, engine-room, and boiler-room. This machine shop is well equipped, and in it is constantly employed a large force of mechanics whose time is occupied in constructing the heavier class of models and mechanical devices called for by the varied experiments and inventions always going on.
Beyond the stockroom, taking up about half the building on the same floor, are a machine shop, engine room, and boiler room. This machine shop is well-equipped, and a large team of mechanics is constantly working there, focused on creating the heavier types of models and mechanical devices needed for the various experiments and inventions that are always taking place.
Immediately above, on the second floor, is found another machine shop in which is maintained a corps of expert mechanics who are called upon to do work of greater precision and fineness, in the construction of tools and experimental models. This is the realm presided over lovingly by John F. Ott, who has been Edison's designer of mechanical devices for over forty years. He still continues to ply his craft with unabated skill and oversees the work of the mechanics as his productions are wrought into concrete shape.
Right above, on the second floor, there's another machine shop where a team of skilled mechanics is available to handle work that requires more precision and detail in making tools and experimental models. This is the domain lovingly overseen by John F. Ott, who has been Edison's mechanical device designer for over forty years. He still practices his craft with unmatched skill and supervises the mechanics as his creations come to life.
In one of the many experimental-rooms lining the sides of the second floor may usually be seen his younger brother, Fred Ott, whose skill as a dexterous manipulator and ingenious mechanic has found ample scope for exercise during the thirty-two years of his service with Edison, not only at the regular laboratories, but also at that connected with the inventor's winter home in Florida. Still another of the Ott family, the son of John F., for some years past has been on the experimental staff of the Orange laboratory. Although possessing in no small degree the mechanical and manipulative skill of the family, he has chosen chemistry as his special domain, and may be found with the other chemists in one of the chemical-rooms.
In one of the many experimental rooms on the second floor, you can usually find his younger brother, Fred Ott. His talent as a skilled manipulator and creative mechanic has been fully utilized during his thirty-two years working with Edison, not only at the main labs but also at the inventor's winter home in Florida. Another member of the Ott family, John F.'s son, has been part of the experimental team at the Orange lab for several years. While he has inherited a good amount of the family’s mechanical and manipulative talent, he has chosen to focus on chemistry and can be found with the other chemists in one of the chemical rooms.
On this same floor is the vacuum-pump room with a glass-blowers' room adjoining, both of them historic by reason of the strenuous work done on incandescent lamps and X-ray tubes within their walls. The tools and appliances are kept intact, for Edison calls occasionally for their use in some of his later experiments, and there is a suspicion among the laboratory staff that some day he may resume work on incandescent lamps. Adjacent to these rooms are several others devoted to physical and mechanical experiments, together with a draughting-room.
On this same floor is the vacuum-pump room next to a glass-blowing room, both of which are historic due to the intense work done on incandescent lamps and X-ray tubes within their walls. The tools and equipment are kept intact because Edison occasionally requests their use for some of his later experiments, and the lab staff suspects that he might one day return to working on incandescent lamps. Next to these rooms are several others dedicated to physical and mechanical experiments, along with a drafting room.
Last to be mentioned, but the first in order as one leaves the head of the stairs leading up to this floor, is No. 12, Edison's favorite room, where he will frequently be found. Plain of aspect, being merely a space boarded off with tongued-and-grooved planks—as all the other rooms are—without ornament or floor covering, and containing only a few articles of cheap furniture, this room seems to exercise a nameless charm for him. The door is always open, and often he can be seen seated at a plain table in the centre of the room, deeply intent on some of the numerous problems in which he is interested. The table is usually pretty well filled with specimens or data of experimental results which have been put there for his examination. At the time of this writing these specimens consist largely of sections of positive elements of the storage battery, together with many samples of nickel hydrate, to which Edison devotes deep study. Close at hand is a microscope which is in frequent use by him in these investigations. Around the room, on shelves, are hundreds of bottles each containing a small quantity of nickel hydrate made in as many different ways, each labelled correspondingly. Always at hand will be found one or two of the laboratory note-books, with frequent entries or comments in the handwriting which once seen is never forgotten.
Last to be mentioned, but the first you come to upon leaving the top of the stairs, is Room 12, Edison's favorite spot, where he can often be found. It looks plain, just a space enclosed by wooden planks—like all the other rooms—without any decorations or flooring, and furnished with only a few inexpensive items. Despite its simplicity, this room has an inexplicable charm for him. The door is always open, and he can often be seen sitting at a simple table in the center of the room, deeply focused on various problems that interest him. The table is usually cluttered with specimens or data from his experimental results, all set out for his review. At the time of this writing, these specimens mainly consist of sections of positive elements from the storage battery, along with numerous samples of nickel hydrate, which Edison studies intensely. A microscope is nearby, and he frequently uses it for these investigations. On the shelves around the room are hundreds of bottles, each containing a small amount of nickel hydrate made in different ways, and each labeled accordingly. You'll always find one or two of the lab notebooks on hand, filled with numerous entries or comments in the distinctive handwriting that’s unforgettable once you’ve seen it.
No. 12 is at times a chemical, a physical, or a mechanical room—occasionally a combination of all, while sometimes it might be called a consultation-room or clinic—for often Edison may be seen there in animated conference with a group of his assistants; but its chief distinction lies in its being one of his favorite haunts, and in the fact that within its walls have been settled many of the perplexing problems and momentous questions that have brought about great changes in electrical and engineering arts during the twenty-odd years that have elapsed since the Orange laboratory was built.
No. 12 is sometimes a chemistry lab, a physics lab, or a workshop—often a mix of all three, and at times it could be called a consultation room or clinic—since it's common to see Edison there engaged in lively discussions with a group of his assistants. However, its main significance lies in being one of his favorite spots, and within its walls, many complex problems and important questions have been addressed, leading to significant advancements in electrical and engineering fields over the past twenty years since the Orange laboratory was established.
Passing now to the top floor the visitor finds himself at the head of a broad hall running almost the entire length of the building, and lined mostly with glass-fronted cabinets containing a multitude of experimental incandescent lamps and an immense variety of models of phonographs, motors, telegraph and telephone apparatus, meters, and a host of other inventions upon which Edison's energies have at one time and another been bent. Here also are other cabinets containing old papers and records, while further along the wall are piled up boxes of historical models and instruments. In fact, this hallway, with its conglomerate contents, may well be considered a scientific attic. It is to be hoped that at no distant day these Edisoniana will be assembled and arranged in a fireproof museum for the benefit of posterity.
Moving up to the top floor, the visitor finds themselves at the entrance of a wide hall that stretches almost the entire length of the building. This hall is mostly lined with glass-fronted cabinets filled with a variety of experimental incandescent lamps and a vast collection of phonograph models, motors, telegraph and telephone equipment, meters, and many other inventions that Edison has worked on over time. There are also other cabinets containing old papers and records, and along the wall, there's a stack of boxes with historical models and instruments. In fact, this hallway, with its diverse contents, could easily be seen as a scientific attic. Hopefully, in the near future, these Edison artifacts will be gathered and organized in a fireproof museum for future generations.
In the front end of the building, and extending over the library, is a large room intended originally and used for a time as the phonograph music-hall for record-making, but now used only as an experimental-room for phonograph work, as the growth of the industry has necessitated a very much larger and more central place where records can be made on a commercial scale. Even the experimental work imposes no slight burden on it. On each side of the hallway above mentioned, rooms are partitioned off and used for experimental work of various kinds, mostly phonographic, although on this floor are also located the storage-battery testing-room, a chemical and physical room and Edison's private office, where all his personal correspondence and business affairs are conducted by his personal secretary, Mr. H. F. Miller. A visitor to this upper floor of the laboratory building cannot but be impressed with a consciousness of the incessant efforts that are being made to improve the reproducing qualities of the phonograph, as he hears from all sides the sounds of vocal and instrumental music constantly varying in volume and timbre, due to changes in the experimental devices under trial.
In the front part of the building, above the library, is a large room that was originally intended and used for a while as a phonograph music hall for making records. Now, it’s just used as an experimental room for phonograph work, since the growth of the industry has required a much larger and more central place for producing records on a commercial scale. Even the experimental work puts a significant demand on it. On each side of the mentioned hallway, there are rooms set up for various types of experimental work, mostly related to phonographs. Additionally, this floor includes a storage battery testing room, a chemistry and physics room, and Edison's private office, where his personal secretary, Mr. H. F. Miller, handles all his personal correspondence and business matters. A visitor to this upper floor of the laboratory building can’t help but feel the constant efforts being made to enhance the sound quality of the phonograph, as they hear sounds of vocal and instrumental music all around, constantly changing in volume and tone due to variations in the experimental devices being tested.
The traditions of the laboratory include cots placed in many of the rooms of these upper floors, but that was in the earlier years when the strenuous scenes of Menlo Park were repeated in the new quarters. Edison and his closest associates were accustomed to carry their labors far into the wee sma' hours, and when physical nature demanded a respite from work, a short rest would be obtained by going to bed on a cot. One would naturally think that the wear and tear of this intense application, day after day and night after night, would have tended to induce a heaviness and gravity of demeanor in these busy men; but on the contrary, the old spirit of good-humor and prankishness was ever present, as its frequent outbursts manifested from time to time. One instance will serve as an illustration. One morning, about 2.30, the late Charles Batchelor announced that he was tired and would go to bed. Leaving Edison and the others busily working, he went out and returned quietly in slippered feet, with his nightgown on, the handle of a feather duster stuck down his back with the feathers waving over his head, and his face marked. With unearthly howls and shrieks, a l'Indien, he pranced about the room, incidentally giving Edison a scare that made him jump up from his work. He saw the joke quickly, however, and joined in the general merriment caused by this prank.
The lab's traditions included cots set up in many of the rooms on the upper floors, but that was back in the earlier days when the intense activities of Menlo Park were echoing in the new space. Edison and his closest collaborators were used to working late into the early hours, and when they needed a break, they would grab a quick nap on a cot. You might think that the toll of this intense focus, day after day and night after night, would make these busy men serious and heavy-hearted; however, the old spirit of good humor and playfulness was always alive, as shown by their frequent antics. One example illustrates this well. One morning, around 2:30, the late Charles Batchelor declared he was tired and was going to bed. After leaving Edison and the others immersed in their work, he quietly slipped back in wearing slippers and a nightgown, with a feather duster handle sticking down his back and the feathers waving over his head, his face painted. He pranced around the room with otherworldly howls and shrieks, surprising Edison so much that he jumped up from his work. But he quickly caught on to the joke and joined in the laughter sparked by this prank.
Leaving the main building with its corps of busy experimenters, and coming out into the spacious yard, one notes the four long single-story brick structures mentioned above. The one nearest the Valley Road is called the galvanometer-room, and was originally intended by Edison to be used for the most delicate and minute electrical measurements. In order to provide rigid resting-places for the numerous and elaborate instruments he had purchased for this purpose, the building was equipped along three-quarters of its length with solid pillars, or tables, of brick set deep in the earth. These were built up to a height of about two and a half feet, and each was surmounted with a single heavy slab of black marble. A cement floor was laid, and every precaution was taken to render the building free from all magnetic influences, so that it would be suitable for electrical work of the utmost accuracy and precision. Hence, iron and steel were entirely eliminated in its construction, copper being used for fixtures for steam and water piping, and, indeed, for all other purposes where metal was employed.
Leaving the main building with its busy team of experimenters and stepping out into the spacious yard, you can see the four long single-story brick buildings mentioned earlier. The one closest to Valley Road is known as the galvanometer room, and Edison originally designed it for the most precise electrical measurements. To provide sturdy support for the numerous and sophisticated instruments he had purchased, the building featured solid brick pillars or tables set deep into the ground along three-quarters of its length. These pillars were built to about two and a half feet high, each topped with a heavy slab of black marble. A cement floor was installed, and every measure was taken to ensure the building was free from any magnetic interferences, making it ideal for electrical work requiring utmost accuracy and precision. Therefore, iron and steel were completely avoided in its construction, with copper used for fixtures related to steam and water piping, as well as for any other metal requirements.
This room was for many years the headquarters of Edison's able assistant, Dr. A. E. Kennelly, now professor of electrical engineering in Harvard University to whose energetic and capable management were intrusted many scientific investigations during his long sojourn at the laboratory. Unfortunately, however, for the continued success of Edison's elaborate plans, he had not been many years established in the laboratory before a trolley road through West Orange was projected and built, the line passing in front of the plant and within seventy-five feet of the galvanometer-room, thus making it practically impossible to use it for the delicate purposes for which it was originally intended.
This room was, for many years, the headquarters of Edison's skilled assistant, Dr. A. E. Kennelly, who is now a professor of electrical engineering at Harvard University. He managed many scientific investigations during his long stay at the lab. Unfortunately, not long after he started working there, a trolley line through West Orange was planned and built, passing right in front of the plant and within seventy-five feet of the galvanometer room, making it nearly impossible to use for the delicate purposes it was originally meant for.
For some time past it has been used for photography and some special experiments on motion pictures as well as for demonstrations connected with physical research; but some reminders of its old-time glory still remain in evidence. In lofty and capacious glass-enclosed cabinets, in company with numerous models of Edison's inventions, repose many of the costly and elaborate instruments rendered useless by the ubiquitous trolley. Instruments are all about, on walls, tables, and shelves, the photometer is covered up; induction coils of various capacities, with other electrical paraphernalia, lie around, almost as if the experimenter were absent for a few days but would soon return and resume his work.
For a while now, it has been used for photography and some special motion picture experiments, as well as for demonstrations related to physical research. However, reminders of its former glory are still visible. In tall, spacious glass cabinets, alongside many models of Edison's inventions, sit numerous costly and intricate instruments that have become useless due to the widespread trolley system. Instruments are scattered everywhere—on the walls, tables, and shelves; the photometer is covered up. Induction coils of various sizes and other electrical equipment are lying around, almost as if the experimenter has just stepped out for a few days and will soon come back to continue his work.
In numbering the group of buildings, the galvanometer-room is No. 1, while the other single-story structures are numbered respectively 2, 3, and 4. On passing out of No. 1 and proceeding to the succeeding building is noticed, between the two, a garage of ample dimensions and a smaller structure, at the door of which stands a concrete-mixer. In this small building Edison has made some of his most important experiments in the process of working out his plans for the poured house. It is in this little place that there was developed the remarkable mixture which is to play so vital a part in the successful construction of these everlasting homes for living millions.
In numbering the group of buildings, the galvanometer room is No. 1, while the other one-story structures are numbered 2, 3, and 4, respectively. When you leave No. 1 and head to the next building, you’ll notice a spacious garage and a smaller structure in between. At the door of the smaller building stands a concrete mixer. In this small building, Edison conducted some of his most important experiments while working on his plans for the poured house. It’s here that the remarkable mixture was developed, which will play a crucial role in successfully constructing these lasting homes for millions of people.
Drawing near to building No. 2, olfactory evidence presents itself of the immediate vicinity of a chemical laboratory. This is confirmed as one enters the door and finds that the entire building is devoted to chemistry. Long rows of shelves and cabinets filled with chemicals line the room; a profusion of retorts, alembics, filters, and other chemical apparatus on numerous tables and stands, greet the eye, while a corps of experimenters may be seen busy in the preparation of various combinations, some of which are boiling or otherwise cooking under their dexterous manipulation.
As you approach building No. 2, you'll notice the distinct smell of a nearby chemical lab. This becomes clear as soon as you step inside and see that the entire building is dedicated to chemistry. Long rows of shelves and cabinets packed with chemicals fill the space; an array of retorts, distillation devices, filters, and other lab equipment are scattered across various tables and stands, while a group of researchers can be seen working on different mixtures, some of which are boiling or reacting under their skilled hands.
It would not require many visits to discover that in this room, also, Edison has a favorite nook. Down at the far end in a corner are a plain little table and chair, and here he is often to be found deeply immersed in a study of the many experiments that are being conducted. Not infrequently he is actively engaged in the manipulation of some compound of special intricacy, whose results might be illuminative of obscure facts not patent to others than himself. Here, too, is a select little library of chemical literature.
It wouldn’t take long to realize that in this room, Edison has a favorite spot. At the far end in a corner are a simple little table and chair, and he can often be found there, deeply focused on studying the many experiments happening around him. Frequently, he is actively working with some complex compound, the results of which could reveal insights not obvious to anyone but himself. There’s also a small, carefully chosen library of chemical literature here.
The next building, No. 3, has a double mission—the farther half being partitioned off for a pattern-making shop, while the other half is used as a store-room for chemicals in quantity and for chemical apparatus and utensils. A grimly humorous incident, as related by one of the laboratory staff, attaches to No. 3. It seems that some time ago one of the helpers in the chemical department, an excitable foreigner, became dissatisfied with his wages, and after making an unsuccessful application for an increase, rushed in desperation to Edison, and said "Eef I not get more money I go to take ze cyanide potassia." Edison gave him one quick, searching glance and, detecting a bluff, replied in an offhand manner: "There's a five-pound bottle in No. 3," and turned to his work again. The foreigner did not go to get the cyanide, but gave up his job.
The next building, No. 3, has a double purpose—the back half is set up as a pattern-making shop, while the front half serves as a storeroom for large quantities of chemicals and for chemical equipment and tools. A darkly humorous story, shared by one of the lab staff, is connected to No. 3. It turns out that a while ago, one of the assistants in the chemical department, an impulsive foreigner, got upset about his pay and, after an unsuccessful request for a raise, rushed in desperation to Edison and said, "If I don’t get more money, I’m going to take the cyanide potassia." Edison gave him a quick, probing look, recognized it as a bluff, and casually replied, "There's a five-pound bottle in No. 3," then went back to his work. The foreigner didn’t go for the cyanide but instead quit his job.
The last of these original buildings, No. 4, was used for many years in Edison's ore-concentrating experiments, and also for rough-and-ready operations of other kinds, such as furnace work and the like. At the present writing it is used as a general stock-room.
The last of these original buildings, No. 4, was used for many years in Edison's ore-concentration experiments, as well as for various other rough operations like furnace work. Currently, it serves as a general stock room.
In the foregoing details, the reader has been afforded but a passing glance at the great practical working equipment which constitutes the theatre of Edison's activities, for, in taking a general view of such a unique and comprehensive laboratory plant, its salient features only can be touched upon to advantage. It would be but repetition to enumerate here the practical results of the laboratory work during the past two decades, as they appear on other pages of this work. Nor can one assume for a moment that the history of Edison's laboratory is a closed book. On the contrary, its territorial boundaries have been increasing step by step with the enlargement of its labors, until now it has been obliged to go outside its own proper domains to occupy some space in and about the great Edison industrial buildings and space immediately adjacent. It must be borne in mind that the laboratory is only the core of a group of buildings devoted to production on a huge scale by hundreds of artisans.
In the details provided, the reader has been given just a brief look at the extensive practical equipment that makes up the space where Edison works. When taking a broad view of such a unique and comprehensive laboratory, only its key features can be properly highlighted. It would be redundant to list the practical outcomes of the lab's work over the last twenty years, as they are documented elsewhere in this book. Moreover, one cannot assume for a second that the history of Edison's laboratory is complete. On the contrary, its boundaries have been gradually expanding with the growth of its efforts, to the point where it has had to extend beyond its original space to occupy areas around the large Edison industrial buildings and the surrounding vicinity. It's important to remember that the laboratory is just the heart of a complex of buildings dedicated to large-scale production by hundreds of skilled workers.
Incidental mention has already been made of the laboratory at Edison's winter residence in Florida, where he goes annually to spend a month or six weeks. This is a miniature copy of the Orange laboratory, with its machine shop, chemical-room, and general experimental department. While it is only in use during his sojourn there, and carries no extensive corps of assistants, the work done in it is not of a perfunctory nature, but is a continuation of his regular activities, and serves to keep him in touch with the progress of experiments at Orange, and enables him to give instructions for their variation and continuance as their scope is expanded by his own investigations made while enjoying what he calls "vacation." What Edison in Florida speaks of as "loafing" would be for most of us extreme and healthy activity in the cooler Far North.
Incidental mention has already been made of the lab at Edison's winter home in Florida, where he goes every year to spend a month or six weeks. This is a smaller version of the Orange lab, complete with its machine shop, chemical room, and general experimental area. While it only operates during his stay there and doesn’t have a large team of assistants, the work done there is far from routine; it continues his regular activities and helps him stay connected with the progress of experiments at Orange. It also allows him to give guidance on how to adjust and continue those experiments as they evolve through research he conducts while enjoying what he calls "vacation." What Edison refers to as "loafing" in Florida would be considered intense and healthy activity for most of us up in the cooler Far North.
A word or two may be devoted to the visitors received at the laboratory, and to the correspondence. It might be injudicious to gauge the greatness of a man by the number of his callers or his letters; but they are at least an indication of the degree to which he interests the world. In both respects, for these forty years, Edison has been a striking example of the manner in which the sentiment of hero-worship can manifest itself, and of the deep desire of curiosity to get satisfaction by personal observation or contact. Edison's mail, like that of most well-known men, is extremely large, but composed in no small degree of letters—thousands of them yearly—that concern only the writers, and might well go to the waste-paper basket without prolonged consideration. The serious and important part of the mail, some personal and some business, occupies the attention of several men; all such letters finding their way promptly into the proper channels, often with a pithy endorsement by Edison scribbled on the margin. What to do with a host of others it is often difficult to decide, even when written by "cranks," who imagine themselves subject to strange electrical ailments from which Edison alone can relieve them. Many people write asking his opinion as to a certain invention, or offering him an interest in it if he will work it out. Other people abroad ask help in locating lost relatives; and many want advice as to what they shall do with their sons, frequently budding geniuses whose ability to wire a bell has demonstrated unusual qualities. A great many persons want autographs, and some would like photographs. The amazing thing about it all is that this flood of miscellaneous letters flows on in one steady, uninterrupted stream, year in and year out; always a curious psychological study in its variety and volume; and ever a proof of the fact that once a man has become established as a personality in the public eye and mind, nothing can stop the tide of correspondence that will deluge him.
A few words can be said about the visitors at the lab and the mail. While it might be unwise to measure a person's greatness by how many people visit or write to them, these factors at least show how much they captivate public interest. For the past forty years, Edison has been a clear example of how hero-worship can show itself and how strong the desire for personal connection is. Edison's mail, like that of many famous people, is vast, but a significant portion consists of letters—thousands each year—that pertain solely to the senders and could easily be discarded without much thought. The important part of the mail, some personal and some business-related, is handled by several staff members; all these letters are quickly routed to the right places, often with a short note from Edison written in the margins. Figuring out what to do with other letters can be challenging, especially those from "cranks" who believe they suffer from unusual electrical issues that only Edison can fix. Many people ask for his opinion on certain inventions or offer him a stake in projects if he helps develop them. Others overseas seek assistance in finding lost family members, and many write for advice about their children, often young talents who have shown promise by being able to wire a doorbell. A lot of people request autographs, and some want photos. The remarkable thing is that this constant flow of varied letters continues every year without fail; it’s a fascinating psychological study in its diversity and volume, and it proves that once someone is known as a public figure, nothing can stop the overwhelming amount of correspondence that comes their way.
It is generally, in the nature of things, easier to write a letter than to make a call; and the semi-retirement of Edison at a distance of an hour by train from New York stands as a means of protection to him against those who would certainly present their respects in person, if he could be got at without trouble. But it may be seriously questioned whether in the aggregate Edison's visitors are less numerous or less time-consuming than his epistolary besiegers. It is the common experience of any visitor to the laboratory that there are usually several persons ahead of him, no matter what the hour of the day, and some whose business has been sufficiently vital to get them inside the porter's gate, or even into the big library and lounging-room. Celebrities of all kinds and distinguished foreigners are numerous—princes, noblemen, ambassadors, artists, litterateurs, scientists, financiers, women. A very large part of the visiting is done by scientific bodies and societies; and then the whole place will be turned over to hundreds of eager, well-dressed men and women, anxious to see everything and to be photographed in the big courtyard around the central hero. Nor are these groups and delegations limited to this country, for even large parties of English, Dutch, Italian, or Japanese visitors come from time to time, and are greeted with the same ready hospitality, although Edison, it is easy to see, is torn between the conflicting emotions of a desire to be courteous, and an anxiety to guard the precious hours of work, or watch the critical stage of a new experiment.
It's generally easier to write a letter than to make a call, and Edison's semi-retirement, located about an hour away from New York by train, serves as a safeguard against those who would definitely come to see him in person if it were easy to do so. However, one could seriously question whether his visitors are actually less numerous or take up less of his time than those who bombard him with letters. Any visitor to the laboratory quickly learns that there are usually several people ahead of them, no matter what time of day it is, and some have business important enough to get them past the porter's gate or even into the main library and lounge. There are many celebrities and notable foreign guests—princes, nobles, ambassadors, artists, writers, scientists, financiers, women. A significant portion of the visits come from scientific organizations and societies, which means the whole place is often filled with hundreds of eager, well-dressed people excited to see everything and get a picture in the large courtyard around the central figure. These groups aren't just from the U.S.; large parties from England, the Netherlands, Italy, or Japan also visit from time to time and receive the same warm welcome. Yet, it’s clear that Edison feels torn between wanting to be polite and the need to protect his precious working hours or keep an eye on the critical phase of a new experiment.
One distinct group of visitors has always been constituted by the "newspaper men." Hardly a day goes by that the journals do not contain some reference to Edison's work or remarks; and the items are generally based on an interview. The reporters are never away from the laboratory very long; for if they have no actual mission of inquiry, there is always the chance of a good story being secured offhand; and the easy, inveterate good-nature of Edison toward reporters is proverbial in the craft. Indeed, it must be stated here that once in a while this confidence has been abused; that stories have been published utterly without foundation; that interviews have been printed which never took place; that articles with Edison's name as author have been widely circulated, although he never saw them; and that in such ways he has suffered directly. But such occasional incidents tend in no wise to lessen Edison's warm admiration of the press or his readiness to avail himself of it whenever a representative goes over to Orange to get the truth or the real facts in regard to any matter of public importance. As for the newspaper clippings containing such articles, or others in which Edison's name appears—they are literally like sands of the sea-shore for number; and the archives of the laboratory that preserve only a very minute percentage of them are a further demonstration of what publicity means, where a figure like Edison is concerned.
One distinct group of visitors has always been made up of the "newspaper people." Hardly a day goes by without the papers mentioning Edison's work or comments; and these pieces are usually based on an interview. Reporters never stay away from the lab for long because, even if they don't have a specific reason to be there, there's always a chance to grab a good story on the spot. Edison's friendly and easygoing nature toward reporters is well-known in the industry. In fact, it should be noted that sometimes this trust has been taken advantage of; stories have been published with no basis in truth, interviews have appeared in print that never happened, and articles credited to Edison have circulated even though he never saw them, causing him direct harm. However, these occasional incidents do not diminish Edison's strong respect for the press or his willingness to work with journalists whenever they come to Orange to get the facts about any important public issue. As for the newspaper clippings that include those articles, or any others featuring Edison's name—they're as numerous as the grains of sand on the beach; and the lab's archives, which keep only a tiny fraction of them, further highlight what publicity means in the context of a figure like Edison.
CHAPTER XXVI
EDISON IN COMMERCE AND MANUFACTURE
AN applicant for membership in the Engineers' Club of Philadelphia is required to give a brief statement of the professional work he has done. Some years ago a certain application was made, and contained the following terse and modest sentence:
AN applicant for membership in the Engineers' Club of Philadelphia is required to provide a brief statement of the professional work he has done. Some years ago, a certain application was submitted that included the following concise and humble sentence:
"I have designed a concentrating plant and built a machine shop, etc., etc. THOMAS A. EDISON."
"I've designed a concentrating plant and built a machine shop, etc., etc. THOMAS A. EDISON."
Although in the foregoing pages the reader has been made acquainted with the tremendous import of the actualities lying behind those "etc., etc.," the narrative up to this point has revealed Edison chiefly in the light of inventor, experimenter, and investigator. There have been some side glimpses of the industries he has set on foot, and of their financial aspects, and a later chapter will endeavor to sum up the intrinsic value of Edison's work to the world. But there are some other interesting points that may be touched on now in regard to a few of Edison's financial and commercial ventures not generally known or appreciated.
Although the reader has learned about the significant realities behind those "etc., etc." in the previous pages, the narrative so far has mainly shown Edison as an inventor, experimenter, and researcher. There have been some brief mentions of the industries he has started and their financial aspects, and a later chapter will aim to summarize the true impact of Edison's work on the world. However, there are some other intriguing details that can now be discussed about a few of Edison's financial and business ventures that are not commonly recognized or valued.
It is a popular idea founded on experience that an inventor is not usually a business man. One of the exceptions proving the rule may perhaps be met in Edison, though all depends on the point of view. All his life he has had a great deal to do with finance and commerce, and as one looks at the magnitude of the vast industries he has helped to create, it would not be at all unreasonable to expect him to be among the multi-millionaires. That he is not is due to the absence of certain qualities, the lack of which Edison is himself the first to admit. Those qualities may not be amiable, but great wealth is hardly ever accumulated without them. If he had not been so intent on inventing he would have made more of his great opportunities for getting rich. If this utter detachment from any love of money for its own sake has not already been illustrated in some of the incidents narrated, one or two stories are available to emphasize the point. They do not involve any want of the higher business acumen that goes to the proper conduct of affairs. It was said of Gladstone that he was the greatest Chancellor of the Exchequer England ever saw, but that as a retail merchant he would soon have ruined himself by his bookkeeping.
It's a well-known idea based on experience that inventors are typically not businesspeople. One exception to this might be Edison, but that really depends on how you look at it. Throughout his life, he has been heavily involved in finance and commerce, and considering the scale of the huge industries he helped create, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect him to be one of the multi-millionaires. The fact that he isn't is due to a lack of certain qualities, which Edison himself acknowledges. Those qualities may not be very nice, but you rarely amass significant wealth without them. If he hadn't been so focused on inventing, he could have made better use of his tremendous opportunities to get rich. If the complete absence of any love for money for its own sake hasn't already been illustrated in some of the stories shared, there are a couple of examples that highlight this. These stories don’t imply a lack of the sharp business sense needed to run things effectively. It was said about Gladstone that he was the greatest Chancellor of the Exchequer England ever had, but as a retail merchant, he probably would have bankrupted himself due to his bookkeeping.
Edison confesses that he has never made a cent out of his patents in electric light and power—in fact, that they have been an expense to him, and thus a free gift to the world. [18] This was true of the European patents as well as the American. "I endeavored to sell my lighting patents in different countries of Europe, and made a contract with a couple of men. On account of their poor business capacity and lack of practicality, they conveyed under the patents all rights to different corporations but in such a way and with such confused wording of the contracts that I never got a cent. One of the companies started was the German Edison, now the great Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. The English company I never got anything for, because a lawyer had originally advised Drexel, Morgan & Co. as to the signing of a certain document, and said it was all right for me to sign. I signed, and I never got a cent because there was a clause in it which prevented me from ever getting anything." A certain easy-going belief in human nature, and even a certain carelessness of attitude toward business affairs, are here revealed. We have already pointed out two instances where in his dealings with the Western Union Company he stipulated that payments of $6000 per year for seventeen years were to be made instead of $100,000 in cash, evidently forgetful of the fact that the annual sum so received was nothing more than legal interest, which could have been earned indefinitely if the capital had been only insisted upon. In later life Edison has been more circumspect, but throughout his early career he was constantly getting into some kind of scrape. Of one experience he says:
Edison admits that he has never made any money from his electric light and power patents; in fact, they've cost him money and ended up being a free gift to the world. [18] This was true for both his European and American patents. "I tried to sell my lighting patents in various European countries and made a deal with a couple of guys. Because they were not great at business and lacked practicality, they transferred all rights under the patents to different corporations in such a confusing way that I never saw a dime. One of the companies they started was the German Edison, now known as the great Allgemeine Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. I never profited from the English company either because a lawyer had advised Drexel, Morgan & Co. on signing a certain document and said it was fine for me to sign it. I signed it and never received any money because there was a clause that prevented me from earning anything." This shows a laid-back belief in human nature and a bit of carelessness in handling business matters. We've already pointed out two instances where he dealt with the Western Union Company: he arranged for payments of $6,000 a year for seventeen years instead of asking for a $100,000 lump sum, seemingly forgetting that the annual payments were just legal interest that could have been earned continuously if he had just insisted on the capital. Later in life, Edison became more cautious, but during his early years, he often found himself in trouble. About one experience, he says:
[Footnote 18: Edison received some stock from the parent lighting company, but as the capital stock of that company was increased from time to time, his proportion grew smaller, and he ultimately used it to obtain ready money with which to create and finance the various "shops" in which were manufactured the various items of electric- lighting apparatus necessary to exploit his system. Besides, he was obliged to raise additional large sums of money from other sources for this purpose. He thus became a manufacturer with capital raised by himself, and the stock that he received later, on the formation of the General Electric Company, was not for his electric-light patents, but was in payment for his manufacturing establishments, which had then grown to be of great commercial importance.]
[Footnote 18: Edison received some stock from the parent lighting company, but as the company's capital stock increased over time, his share got smaller. He ultimately sold it to get cash to create and fund the various "shops" where different electric lighting equipment needed for his system was made. Additionally, he had to raise significant amounts of money from other sources for this purpose. As a result, he became a manufacturer with capital he raised himself, and the stock he received later, when the General Electric Company was formed, was not for his electric light patents but as payment for his manufacturing facilities, which had become quite commercially significant.]
"In the early days I was experimenting with metallic filaments for the incandescent light, and sent a certain man out to California in search of platinum. He found a considerable quantity in the sluice-boxes of the Cherokee Valley Mining Company; but just then he found also that fruit-gardening was the thing, and dropped the subject. He then came to me and said that if he could raise $4000 he could go into some kind of orchard arrangement out there, and would give me half the profits. I was unwilling to do it, not having very much money just then, but his persistence was such that I raised the money and gave it to him. He went back to California, and got into mining claims and into fruit-growing, and became one of the politicians of the Coast, and, I believe, was on the staff of the Governor of the State. A couple of years ago he wounded his daughter and shot himself because he had become ruined financially. I never heard from him after he got the money."
"In the early days, I was experimenting with metallic filaments for incandescent light and sent a guy out to California to look for platinum. He found a decent amount in the sluice-boxes of the Cherokee Valley Mining Company, but then he realized that fruit gardening was the way to go and dropped the idea. He came back to me and said that if he could raise $4,000, he could start some kind of orchard out there and would give me half the profits. I was hesitant because I didn't have much money at the time, but he was so persistent that I managed to raise the money and gave it to him. He returned to California, got involved in mining claims and fruit growing, and became a politician on the Coast. I believe he was even part of the Governor's staff. A couple of years ago, he wounded his daughter and shot himself because he lost everything financially. I never heard from him after I gave him the money."
Edison tells of another similar episode. "I had two men working for me—one a German, the other a Jew. They wanted me to put up a little money and start them in a shop in New York to make repairs, etc. I put up $800, and was to get half of the profits, and each of them one-quarter. I never got anything for it. A few years afterward I went to see them, and asked what they were doing, and said I would like to sell my interest. They said: 'Sell out what?' 'Why,' I said, 'my interest in the machinery.' They said: 'You don't own this machinery. This is our machinery. You have no papers to show anything. You had better get out.' I am inclined to think that the percentage of crooked people was smaller when I was young. It has been steadily rising, and has got up to a very respectable figure now. I hope it will never reach par." To which lugubrious episode so provocative of cynicism, Edison adds: "When I was a young fellow the first thing I did when I went to a town was to put something into the savings-bank and start an account. When I came to New York I put $30 into a savings-bank under the New York Sun office. After the money had been in about two weeks the bank busted. That was in 1870. In 1909 I got back $6.40, with a charge for $1.75 for law expenses. That shows the beauty of New York receiverships."
Edison shares another similar story. "I had two guys working for me—one was German, the other was Jewish. They wanted me to invest some money and help them start a shop in New York for repairs and other services. I put in $800, and I was supposed to get half of the profits, while each of them would get a quarter. I never saw a dime from it. A few years later, I went to check on them and asked what they were up to. I mentioned I wanted to sell my stake. They said, 'Sell what?' 'My stake in the machinery,' I replied. They said, 'You don't own this machinery. This is our machinery. You don't have any paperwork showing ownership. You should just leave.' I tend to think that there were fewer dishonest people when I was younger. The percentage has been steadily climbing, and now it's reached a pretty significant level. I hope it never hits the peak." In response to this dismal story that fuels cynicism, Edison adds: "When I was a young guy, the first thing I did when I arrived in a new town was to put some money into a savings account. When I got to New York, I deposited $30 in a savings bank under the New York Sun office. After about two weeks, the bank collapsed. That was in 1870. In 1909, I received $6.40 back, but they charged me $1.75 for legal fees. That shows how great New York receiverships are."
It is hardly to be wondered at that Edison is rather frank and unsparing in some of his criticisms of shady modern business methods, and the mention of the following incident always provokes him to a fine scorn. "I had an interview with one of the wealthiest men in New York. He wanted me to sell out my associates in the electric lighting business, and offered me all I was going to get and $100,000 besides. Of course I would not do it. I found out that the reason for this offer was that he had had trouble with Mr. Morgan, and wanted to get even with him." Wall Street is, in fact, a frequent object of rather sarcastic reference, applying even to its regular and probably correct methods of banking. "When I was running my ore-mine," he says, "and got up to the point of making shipments to John Fritz, I didn't have capital enough to carry the ore, so I went to J. P. Morgan & Co. and said I wanted them to give me a letter to the City Bank. I wanted to raise some money. I got a letter to Mr. Stillman; and went over and told him I wanted to open an account and get some loans and discounts. He turned me down, and would not do it. 'Well,' I said, 'isn't it banking to help a man in this way?' He said: 'What you want is a partner.' I felt very much crestfallen. I went over to a bank in Newark—the Merchants'—and told them what I wanted. They said: 'Certainly, you can have the money.' I made my deposit, and they pulled me through all right. My idea of Wall Street banking has been very poor since that time. Merchant banking seems to be different."
It’s no surprise that Edison is quite open and harsh in some of his criticisms of dubious modern business practices, and just mentioning the following incident always gets him worked up. "I had a meeting with one of the richest men in New York. He wanted me to sell out my partners in the electric lighting business and offered me everything I was supposed to receive, plus $100,000. Of course, I refused. I found out the reason for his offer was that he had issues with Mr. Morgan and wanted to get back at him." Wall Street often gets a sarcastic mention, even regarding its usual and likely sound banking practices. "When I was managing my ore mine," he says, "and was preparing to ship to John Fritz, I didn't have enough capital to handle the ore, so I went to J. P. Morgan & Co. and asked for a letter to the City Bank to raise some funds. I got a letter to Mr. Stillman, then went over and told him I wanted to open an account and get some loans and discounts. He turned me down and wouldn’t do it. 'Well,' I said, 'isn’t it banking to help a guy out like this?' He replied: 'What you need is a partner.' I felt really deflated. I went to a bank in Newark—the Merchants'—and told them what I needed. They said: 'Sure, you can have the money.' I made my deposit, and they came through for me. Since then, my view of Wall Street banking has been pretty negative. Merchant banking seems to be different."
As a general thing, Edison has had no trouble in raising money when he needed it, the reason being that people have faith in him as soon as they come to know him. A little incident bears on this point. "In operating the Schenectady works Mr. Insull and I had a terrible burden. We had enormous orders and little money, and had great difficulty to meet our payrolls and buy supplies. At one time we had so many orders on hand we wanted $200,000 worth of copper, and didn't have a cent to buy it. We went down to the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company, and told Mr. Cowles just how we stood. He said: 'I will see what I can do. Will you let my bookkeeper look at your books?' We said: 'Come right up and look them over.' He sent his man up and found we had the orders and were all right, although we didn't have the money. He said: 'I will let you have the copper.' And for years he trusted us for all the copper we wanted, even if we didn't have the money to pay for it."
Generally, Edison has had no trouble raising funds when he needed them, because people trust him as soon as they get to know him. A little incident illustrates this. "While running the Schenectady works, Mr. Insull and I faced a huge challenge. We had massive orders but limited cash, making it tough to meet our payrolls and purchase supplies. At one point, we had so many orders that we needed $200,000 worth of copper, yet we didn't have a dime to buy it. We went to the Ansonia Brass and Copper Company and explained our situation to Mr. Cowles. He replied, 'Let me see what I can do. Can my bookkeeper check your books?' We said, 'Sure, come right up and take a look.' He sent his person up, found that we had the orders and were in good shape, even though we didn't have the money. He said, 'I’ll let you have the copper.' For years, he trusted us with all the copper we needed, even when we couldn’t pay for it."
It is not generally known that Edison, in addition to being a newsboy and a contributor to the technical press, has also been a backer and an "angel" for various publications. This is perhaps the right place at which to refer to the matter, as it belongs in the list of his financial or commercial enterprises. Edison sums up this chapter of his life very pithily. "I was interested, as a telegrapher, in journalism, and started the Telegraph Journal, and got out about a dozen numbers when it was taken over by W. J. Johnston, who afterward founded the Electrical World on it as an offshoot from the Operator. I also started Science, and ran it for a year and a half. It cost me too much money to maintain, and I sold it to Gardiner Hubbard, the father-in-law of Alexander Graham Bell. He carried it along for years." Both these papers are still in prosperous existence, particularly the Electrical World, as the recognized exponent of electrical development in America, where now the public spends as much annually for electricity as it does for daily bread.
It's not widely known that Edison, besides being a newsboy and a contributor to technical publications, has also been a supporter and an "angel" for various magazines. This is probably the right moment to mention it, as it fits into the list of his financial or commercial ventures. Edison summarizes this part of his life succinctly: "I was interested in journalism as a telegrapher and started the Telegraph Journal, putting out about a dozen issues before W. J. Johnston took it over, who later founded the Electrical World as an offshoot of the Operator. I also launched Science and ran it for a year and a half. It was too costly for me to keep going, so I sold it to Gardiner Hubbard, Alexander Graham Bell's father-in-law. He continued it for years." Both of these publications still thrive today, especially the Electrical World, which is recognized as a leading advocate for electrical development in America, where the public now spends as much on electricity each year as on daily bread.
From all that has been said above it will be understood that Edison's real and remarkable capacity for business does not lie in ability to "take care of himself," nor in the direction of routine office practice, nor even in ordinary administrative affairs. In short, he would and does regard it as a foolish waste of his time to give attention to the mere occupancy of a desk.
From everything mentioned above, it's clear that Edison's true and impressive business talent isn't about being able to "look after himself," managing daily office tasks, or handling typical administrative duties. In short, he sees it as a pointless waste of his time to focus on just sitting at a desk.
His commercial strength manifests itself rather in the outlining of matters relating to organization and broad policy with a sagacity arising from a shrewd perception and appreciation of general business requirements and conditions, to which should be added his intensely comprehensive grasp of manufacturing possibilities and details, and an unceasing vigilance in devising means of improving the quality of products and increasing the economy of their manufacture.
His business strength is evident in how he outlines matters related to organization and overall policy, showcasing a sharp understanding of general business needs and conditions. Additionally, his thorough knowledge of manufacturing possibilities and details, along with his constant attention to finding ways to enhance product quality and improve manufacturing efficiency, further highlight his capabilities.
Like other successful commanders, Edison also possesses the happy faculty of choosing suitable lieutenants to carry out his policies and to manage the industries he has created, such, for instance, as those with which this chapter has to deal—namely, the phonograph, motion picture, primary battery, and storage battery enterprises.
Like other successful leaders, Edison also has the great ability to select the right people to implement his policies and run the industries he has built, such as those discussed in this chapter—specifically, the phonograph, motion picture, primary battery, and storage battery businesses.
The Portland cement business has already been dealt with separately, and although the above remarks are appropriate to it also, Edison being its head and informing spirit, the following pages are intended to be devoted to those industries that are grouped around the laboratory at Orange, and that may be taken as typical of Edison's methods on the manufacturing side.
The Portland cement business has already been covered separately, and while the comments above are relevant to it as well, with Edison being its leader and driving force, the following pages will focus on the industries surrounding the laboratory in Orange, which exemplify Edison's manufacturing methods.
Within a few months after establishing himself at the present laboratory, in 1887, Edison entered upon one of those intensely active periods of work that have been so characteristic of his methods in commercializing his other inventions. In this case his labors were directed toward improving the phonograph so as to put it into thoroughly practicable form, capable of ordinary use by the public at large. The net result of this work was the general type of machine of which the well-known phonograph of today is a refinement evolved through many years of sustained experiment and improvement.
Within a few months of setting up his current lab in 1887, Edison went through one of those highly productive phases that defined his approach to commercializing his other inventions. This time, his efforts focused on enhancing the phonograph to make it practical and suitable for everyday use by the general public. The outcome of this work was the basic model of the machine that today's well-known phonograph is a refined version of, developed through years of ongoing experiments and improvements.
After a considerable period of strenuous activity in the eighties, the phonograph and its wax records were developed to a sufficient degree of perfection to warrant him in making arrangements for their manufacture and commercial introduction. At this time the surroundings of the Orange laboratory were distinctly rural in character. Immediately adjacent to the main building and the four smaller structures, constituting the laboratory plant, were grass meadows that stretched away for some considerable distance in all directions, and at its back door, so to speak, ducks paddled around and quacked in a pond undisturbed. Being now ready for manufacturing, but requiring more facilities, Edison increased his real-estate holdings by purchasing a large tract of land lying contiguous to what he already owned. At one end of the newly acquired land two unpretentious brick structures were erected, equipped with first-class machinery, and put into commission as shops for manufacturing phonographs and their record blanks; while the capacious hall forming the third story of the laboratory, over the library, was fitted up and used as a music-room where records were made.
After a significant amount of hard work in the eighties, the phonograph and its wax records were developed to a level of quality that encouraged him to start making plans for their production and commercial launch. At this time, the area around the Orange laboratory was quite rural. Right next to the main building and the four smaller structures that made up the laboratory plant were grass meadows that extended for quite a distance in every direction, and just out the back door, ducks paddled around and quacked in an undisturbed pond. Now ready for manufacturing but needing more facilities, Edison expanded his real estate by buying a large piece of land next to what he already owned. On one end of the newly acquired land, two simple brick buildings were built, equipped with top-notch machinery, and set up as shops for making phonographs and their record blanks. Meanwhile, the spacious hall on the third floor of the laboratory, above the library, was turned into a music room where records were produced.
Thus the modern Edison phonograph made its modest debut in 1888, in what was then called the "Improved" form to distinguish it from the original style of machine he invented in 1877, in which the record was made on a sheet of tin-foil held in place upon a metallic cylinder. The "Improved" form is the general type so well known for many years and sold at the present day—viz., the spring or electric motor-driven machine with the cylindrical wax record—in fact, the regulation Edison phonograph.
Thus the modern Edison phonograph made its modest debut in 1888, in what was then called the "Improved" form to distinguish it from the original style of machine he invented in 1877, where the record was made on a sheet of tin foil held in place on a metallic cylinder. The "Improved" form is the general type that has been well known for many years and is still sold today—namely, the spring or electric motor-driven machine with the cylindrical wax record—in fact, the standard Edison phonograph.
It did not take a long time to find a market for the products of the newly established factory, for a world-wide public interest in the machine had been created by the appearance of newspaper articles from time to time, announcing the approaching completion by Edison of his improved phonograph. The original (tin-foil) machine had been sufficient to illustrate the fact that the human voice and other sounds could be recorded and reproduced, but such a type of machine had sharp limitations in general use; hence the coming into being of a type that any ordinary person could handle was sufficient of itself to insure a market. Thus the demand for the new machines and wax records grew apace as the corporations organized to handle the business extended their lines. An examination of the newspaper files of the years 1888, 1889, and 1890 will reveal the great excitement caused by the bringing out of the new phonograph, and how frequently and successfully it was employed in public entertainments, either for the whole or part of an evening. In this and other ways it became popularized to a still further extent. This led to the demand for a nickel-in-the-slot machine, which, when established, became immensely popular over the whole country. In its earlier forms the "Improved" phonograph was not capable of such general non-expert handling as is the machine of the present day, and consequently there was a constant endeavor on Edison's part to simplify the construction of the machine and its manner of operation. Experimentation was incessantly going on with this in view, and in the processes of evolution changes were made here and there that resulted in a still greater measure of perfection.
It didn’t take long to find a market for the products of the newly established factory because there was a global public interest in the machine sparked by newspaper articles occasionally announcing Edison’s progress on his improved phonograph. The original tin-foil machine had been enough to show that the human voice and other sounds could be recorded and replayed, but that type of machine had serious limitations for everyday use; thus, creating a version that anyone could operate ensured its marketability. Consequently, the demand for the new machines and wax records grew rapidly as corporations organized to handle the business and expanded their offerings. A look through newspaper archives from 1888, 1889, and 1890 will show the excitement generated by the introduction of the new phonograph and how frequently it was successfully used in public entertainment, whether for the entire evening or part of it. This helped to further popularize the technology. This growing popularity led to the demand for a nickel-in-the-slot machine, which, once established, became hugely popular across the country. In its earlier versions, the "Improved" phonograph wasn’t as user-friendly as today’s machines, leading Edison to continuously work on simplifying its design and operation. Constant experimentation aimed at this goal led to various changes over time that resulted in an even greater level of perfection.
In various ways there was a continual slow and steady growth of the industry thus created, necessitating the erection of many additional buildings as the years passed by. During part of the last decade there was a lull, caused mostly from the failure of corporate interests to carry out their contract relations with Edison, and he was thereby compelled to resort to legal proceedings, at the end of which he bought in the outstanding contracts and assumed command of the business personally.
The industry that emerged grew gradually and steadily in many ways, leading to the construction of numerous additional buildings over the years. For part of the last decade, there was a slowdown, mainly due to corporate interests not fulfilling their contracts with Edison, forcing him to take legal action. In the end, he acquired the outstanding contracts and took direct control of the business.
Being thus freed from many irksome restrictions that had hung heavily upon him, Edison now proceeded to push the phonograph business under a broader policy than that which obtained under his previous contractual relations. With the ever-increasing simplification and efficiency of the machine and a broadening of its application, the results of this policy were manifested in a still more rapid growth of the business that necessitated further additions to the manufacturing plant. And thus matters went on until the early part of the present decade, when the factory facilities were becoming so rapidly outgrown as to render radical changes necessary. It was in these circumstances that Edison's sagacity and breadth of business capacity came to the front. With characteristic boldness and foresight he planned the erection of the series of magnificent concrete buildings that now stand adjacent to and around the laboratory, and in which the manufacturing plant is at present housed.
Freed from many annoying restrictions that had weighed him down, Edison moved forward to expand the phonograph business with a broader strategy than what he had under his previous contracts. With the machine becoming simpler and more efficient and its applications expanding, this strategy led to even faster business growth that required further expansions of the manufacturing plant. Things continued this way until the early part of this decade, when the factory facilities were quickly becoming inadequate, making major changes necessary. It was in this situation that Edison's insight and business acumen shone through. With his usual boldness and vision, he planned the construction of a series of impressive concrete buildings that now stand next to and around the laboratory and where the manufacturing plant is currently located.
There was no narrowness in his views in designing these buildings, but, on the contrary, great faith in the future, for his plans included not only the phonograph industry, but provided also for the coming development of motion pictures and of the primary and storage battery enterprises.
There was no narrowness in his views when designing these buildings; instead, he had great faith in the future. His plans included not only the phonograph industry but also accounted for the upcoming development of motion pictures and the primary and storage battery businesses.
In the aggregate there are twelve structures (including the administration building), of which six are of imposing dimensions, running from 200 feet long by 50 feet wide to 440 feet in length by 115 feet in width, all these larger buildings, except one, being five stories in height. They are constructed entirely of reinforced concrete with Edison cement, including walls, floors, and stairways, thus eliminating fire hazard to the utmost extent, and insuring a high degree of protection, cleanliness, and sanitation. As fully three-fourths of the area of their exterior framework consists of windows, an abundance of daylight is secured. These many advantages, combined with lofty ceilings on every floor, provide ideal conditions for the thousands of working people engaged in this immense plant.
In total, there are twelve buildings (including the administration building), six of which are quite large, ranging from 200 feet long by 50 feet wide to 440 feet long by 115 feet wide. All these larger buildings, except for one, are five stories tall. They are made entirely of reinforced concrete with Edison cement, including the walls, floors, and stairways, which minimizes fire hazards and ensures a high level of safety, cleanliness, and sanitation. With about three-quarters of their exterior made up of windows, there’s plenty of natural light. These many benefits, along with high ceilings on every floor, create ideal working conditions for the thousands of employees at this massive facility.
In addition to these twelve concrete structures there are a few smaller brick and wooden buildings on the grounds, in which some special operations are conducted. These, however, are few in number, and at some future time will be concentrated in one or more additional concrete buildings. It will afford a clearer idea of the extent of the industries clustered immediately around the laboratory when it is stated that the combined floor space which is occupied by them in all these buildings is equivalent in the aggregate to over fourteen acres.
In addition to these twelve concrete buildings, there are a few smaller brick and wooden structures on the grounds where some special operations take place. However, these are limited in number and will eventually be consolidated into one or more new concrete buildings. It gives a clearer picture of the size of the industries located right around the laboratory to mention that the total floor space they occupy in all these buildings amounts to over fourteen acres.
It would be instructive, but scarcely within the scope of the narrative, to conduct the reader through this extensive plant and see its many interesting operations in detail. It must suffice, however, to note its complete and ample equipment with modern machinery of every kind applicable to the work; its numerous (and some of them wonderfully ingenious) methods, processes, machines, and tools specially designed or invented for the manufacture of special parts and supplemental appliances for the phonograph or other Edison products; and also to note the interesting variety of trades represented in the different departments, in which are included chemists, electricians, electrical mechanicians, machinists, mechanics, pattern-makers, carpenters, cabinet-makers, varnishers, japanners, tool-makers, lapidaries, wax experts, photographic developers and printers, opticians, electroplaters, furnacemen, and others, together with factory experimenters and a host of general employees, who by careful training have become specialists and experts in numerous branches of these industries.
It would be interesting, but not really part of the story, to take you through this large plant and show you its many fascinating operations in detail. However, it’s sufficient to point out its complete and modern equipment with all kinds of machinery suited for the work; its various (some of them impressively clever) methods, processes, machines, and tools specifically designed or created for making special parts and additional equipment for the phonograph or other Edison products; and also to highlight the interesting variety of trades found in the different departments, which include chemists, electricians, electrical mechanics, machinists, mechanics, pattern-makers, carpenters, cabinet-makers, varnishers, japanners, tool-makers, lapidaries, wax specialists, photographic developers and printers, opticians, electroplaters, furnace workers, and many others, along with factory testers and numerous general employees, who, through careful training, have become specialists and experts in various aspects of these industries.
Edison's plans for this manufacturing plant were sufficiently well outlined to provide ample capacity for the natural growth of the business; and although that capacity (so far as phonographs is concerned) has actually reached an output of over 6000 complete phonographs PER WEEK, and upward of 130,000 molded records PER DAY—with a pay-roll embracing over 3500 employees, including office force—and amounting to about $45,000 per week—the limits of production have not yet been reached.
Edison's plans for this manufacturing plant were clearly outlined to support the natural growth of the business. Although the capacity (specifically for phonographs) has actually reached an output of over 6,000 complete phonographs per week and more than 130,000 molded records per day—with a payroll covering over 3,500 employees, including office staff—and totaling about $45,000 per week—the production limits have not yet been reached.
The constant outpouring of products in such large quantities bespeaks the unremitting activities of an extensive and busy selling organization to provide for their marketing and distribution. This important department (the National Phonograph Company), in all its branches, from president to office-boy, includes about two hundred employees on its office pay-roll, and makes its headquarters in the administration building, which is one of the large concrete structures above referred to. The policy of the company is to dispose of its wares through regular trade channels rather than to deal direct with the public, trusting to local activity as stimulated by a liberal policy of national advertising. Thus, there has been gradually built up a very extensive business until at the present time an enormous output of phonographs and records is distributed to retail customers in the United States and Canada through the medium of about one hundred and fifty jobbers and over thirteen thousand dealers. The Edison phonograph industry thus organized is helped by frequent conventions of this large commercial force.
The constant flow of products in such large amounts shows the ongoing efforts of a vast and busy sales organization dedicated to their marketing and distribution. This important department (the National Phonograph Company), from the president down to the office assistant, consists of around two hundred employees on its payroll and is based in the administration building, which is one of the large concrete structures mentioned earlier. The company's policy is to sell its products through regular trade channels instead of dealing directly with customers, relying on local activity driven by a strong national advertising strategy. As a result, a very extensive business has been gradually established, and currently, a massive output of phonographs and records is distributed to retail customers in the United States and Canada through about one hundred and fifty wholesalers and over thirteen thousand dealers. The Edison phonograph industry, operating this way, is supported by regular conventions of this large commercial group.
Besides this, the National Phonograph Company maintains a special staff for carrying on the business with foreign countries. While the aggregate transactions of this department are not as extensive as those for the United States and Canada, they are of considerable volume, as the foreign office distributes in bulk a very large number of phonographs and records to selling companies and agencies in Europe, Asia, Australia, Japan, and, indeed, to all the countries of the civilized world. [19] Like England's drumbeat, the voice of the Edison phonograph is heard around the world in undying strains throughout the twenty-four hours.
In addition, the National Phonograph Company has a dedicated team for handling business with foreign countries. While the total transactions in this department aren't as large as those for the United States and Canada, they still represent a significant amount, as the foreign office distributes a substantial number of phonographs and records in bulk to sales companies and agencies in Europe, Asia, Australia, Japan, and indeed, to all the countries in the developed world. [19] Like England's drumbeat, the sound of the Edison phonograph resonates globally in timeless melodies throughout the day and night.
[Footnote 19: It may be of interest to the reader to note some parts of the globe to which shipments of phonographs and records are made: Samoan Islands Falkland Islands Siam Corea Crete Island Paraguay Chile Canary Islands Egypt British East Africa Cape Colony Portuguese East Africa Liberia Java Straits Settlements Madagascar Fanning Islands New Zealand French Indo-China Morocco Ecuador Brazil Madeira South Africa Azores Manchuria Ceylon Sierra Leone]
[Footnote 19: It might interest the reader to note some locations around the world where shipments of phonographs and records are sent: Samoan Islands Falkland Islands Thailand Korea Crete Island Paraguay Chile Canary Islands Egypt British East Africa Cape Colony Portuguese East Africa Liberia Java Straits Settlements Madagascar Fanning Islands New Zealand French Indo-China Morocco Ecuador Brazil Madeira South Africa Azores Manchuria Sri Lanka Sierra Leone]
In addition to the main manufacturing plant at Orange, another important adjunct must not be forgotten, and that is, the Recording Department in New York City, where the master records are made under the superintendence of experts who have studied the intricacies of the art with Edison himself. This department occupies an upper story in a lofty building, and in its various rooms may be seen and heard many prominent musicians, vocalists, speakers, and vaudeville artists studiously and busily engaged in making the original records, which are afterward sent to Orange, and which, if approved by the expert committee, are passed on to the proper department for reproduction in large quantities.
In addition to the main manufacturing plant in Orange, we shouldn't overlook another key part, which is the Recording Department in New York City, where the master records are created under the supervision of experts who learned the craft directly from Edison. This department occupies an upper floor in a tall building, and in its various rooms, you can see and hear many famous musicians, vocalists, speakers, and vaudeville performers working diligently to create the original records. These are then sent to Orange, and if they get the green light from the expert committee, they are forwarded to the appropriate department for mass reproduction.
When we consider the subject of motion pictures we find a similarity in general business methods, for while the projecting machines and copies of picture films are made in quantity at the Orange works (just as phonographs and duplicate records are so made), the original picture, or film, like the master record, is made elsewhere. There is this difference, however: that, from the particular nature of the work, practically ALL master records are made at one convenient place, while the essential interest in SOME motion pictures lies in the fact that they are taken in various parts of the world, often under exceptional circumstances. The "silent drama," however, calls also for many representations which employ conventional acting, staging, and the varied appliances of stagecraft. Hence, Edison saw early the necessity of providing a place especially devised and arranged for the production of dramatic performances in pantomime.
When we think about movies, we notice a similarity in overall business practices. Just like phonographs and duplicate records are manufactured in bulk at the Orange works, the projectors and copies of film reels are produced there too. However, the original film, like the master record, is created somewhere else. The difference is that, due to the nature of the work, almost all master records are made in one convenient location, while the key appeal of some films comes from the fact that they're shot in different parts of the world, often in unique situations. The "silent drama" also requires many performances that use traditional acting, staging, and various elements of stagecraft. Because of this, Edison recognized the need for a dedicated place specially designed for producing dramatic performances in pantomime.
It is a far cry from the crude structure of early days—the "Black Maria" of 1891, swung around on its pivot in the Orange laboratory yard—to the well-appointed Edison theatres, or pantomime studios, in New York City. The largest of these is located in the suburban Borough of the Bronx, and consists of a three-story-and-basement building of reinforced concrete, in which are the offices, dressing-rooms, wardrobe and property-rooms, library and developing department. Contiguous to this building, and connected with it, is the theatre proper, a large and lofty structure whose sides and roof are of glass, and whose floor space is sufficiently ample for six different sets of scenery at one time, with plenty of room left for a profusion of accessories, such as tables, chairs, pianos, bunch-lights, search-lights, cameras, and a host of varied paraphernalia pertaining to stage effects.
It’s a big change from the simple setup of the early days—the "Black Maria" of 1891, which turned on its pivot in the Orange lab yard—to the well-equipped Edison theaters or pantomime studios in New York City. The largest of these is in the Bronx, a suburban borough, and features a three-story building with a basement made of reinforced concrete, which houses the offices, dressing rooms, wardrobe and props rooms, library, and developing department. Attached to this building is the main theater, a spacious and tall structure with glass walls and roof, offering enough floor space for six different sets of scenery at once, along with ample room for a variety of accessories like tables, chairs, pianos, lighting, searchlights, cameras, and all sorts of equipment for stage effects.
The second Edison theatre, or studio, is located not far from the shopping district in New York City. In all essential features, except size and capacity, it is a duplicate of the one in the Bronx, of which it is a supplement.
The second Edison theater, or studio, is located close to the shopping district in New York City. In all key aspects, except for size and capacity, it is a replica of the one in the Bronx, which it complements.
To a visitor coming on the floor of such a theatre for the first time there is a sense of confusion in beholding the heterogeneous "sets" of scenery and the motley assemblage of characters represented in the various plays in the process of "taking," or rehearsal. While each set constitutes virtually a separate stage, they are all on the same floor, without wings or proscenium-arches, and separated only by a few feet. Thus, for instance, a Japanese house interior may be seen cheek by jowl with an ordinary prison cell, flanked by a mining-camp, which in turn stands next to a drawing-room set, and in each a set of appropriate characters in pantomimic motion. The action is incessant, for in any dramatic representation intended for the motion-picture film every second counts.
To a visitor stepping onto the floor of such a theater for the first time, it feels confusing to see the variety of "sets" and the mixed group of characters from the different plays being rehearsed. Each set acts as its own stage, but they're all on the same floor, with no wings or proscenium arches, just a few feet apart. So, for example, a Japanese house interior may be right next to a regular prison cell, beside a mining camp, which in turn is next to a drawing-room set, with characters in each set moving in a pantomime. The action doesn’t stop, because in any dramatic scene meant for film, every second matters.
The production of several completed plays per week necessitates the employment of a considerable staff of people of miscellaneous trades and abilities. At each of these two studios there is employed a number of stage-directors, scene-painters, carpenters, property-men, photographers, costumers, electricians, clerks, and general assistants, besides a capable stock company of actors and actresses, whose generous numbers are frequently augmented by the addition of a special star, or by a number of extra performers, such as Rough Riders or other specialists. It may be, occasionally, that the exigencies of the occasion require the work of a performing horse, dog, or other animal. No matter what the object required may be, whether animate or inanimate, if it is necessary for the play it is found and pressed into service.
The production of several finished plays each week requires a large team of people with diverse skills and talents. At both studios, there are numerous stage directors, set designers, carpenters, prop managers, photographers, costume designers, electricians, clerks, and general assistants, along with a skilled group of actors and actresses. This core group is often expanded by bringing in a special star or additional performers, like Rough Riders or other specialists. Sometimes, the needs of the show even call for a performing horse, dog, or other animals. Regardless of whether the item needed is alive or not, if it’s essential for the play, it gets found and put to work.
These two studios, while separated from the main plant, are under the same general management, and their original negative films are forwarded as made to the Orange works, where the large copying department is located in one of the concrete buildings. Here, after the film has been passed upon by a committee, a considerable number of positive copies are made by ingenious processes, and after each one is separately tested, or "run off," in one or other of the three motion-picture theatres in the building, they are shipped out to film exchanges in every part of the country. How extensive this business has become may be appreciated when it is stated that at the Orange plant there are produced at this time over eight million feet of motion-picture film per year. And Edison's company is only one of many producers.
These two studios, while separate from the main facility, are managed under the same leadership, and their original negative films are sent to the Orange works as they're produced, where the large copying department is housed in one of the concrete buildings. Here, after the film has been reviewed by a committee, a significant number of positive copies are created using innovative methods, and each one is individually tested or "run off" in one of the three movie theaters in the building before being shipped out to film exchanges all over the country. The scale of this operation is remarkable, as it’s reported that the Orange plant currently produces over eight million feet of motion-picture film each year. And Edison's company is just one of many producers.
Another of the industries at the Orange works is the manufacture of projecting kinetoscopes, by means of which the motion pictures are shown. While this of itself is also a business of considerable magnitude in its aggregate yearly transactions, it calls for no special comment in regard to commercial production, except to note that a corps of experimenters is constantly employed refining and perfecting details of the machine. Its basic features of operation as conceived by Edison remain unchanged.
Another industry at the Orange works is the production of projecting kinetoscopes, which are used to show motion pictures. While this is a significant business with substantial yearly transactions, there’s nothing particularly new to say about its commercial production, except to mention that a team of experimenters is always working on refining and perfecting the machine's details. The basic operational features, as originally designed by Edison, remain the same.
On coming to consider the Edison battery enterprises, we must perforce extend the territorial view to include a special chemical-manufacturing plant, which is in reality a branch of the laboratory and the Orange works, although actually situated about three miles away.
When looking into the Edison battery initiatives, we need to broaden our perspective to include a specific chemical manufacturing plant, which is essentially a part of the laboratory and the Orange works, even though it is located about three miles away.
Both the primary and the storage battery employ certain chemical products as essential parts of their elements, and indeed owe their very existence to the peculiar preparation and quality of such products, as exemplified by Edison's years of experimentation and research. Hence the establishment of his own chemical works at Silver Lake, where, under his personal supervision, the manufacture of these products is carried on in charge of specially trained experts. At the present writing the plant covers about seven acres of ground; but there is ample room for expansion, as Edison, with wise forethought, secured over forty acres of land, so as to be prepared for developments.
Both the primary and storage batteries use specific chemical products as essential components, and their very existence depends on the unique preparation and quality of these products, as shown by Edison's years of experimentation and research. This led to the establishment of his own chemical plant at Silver Lake, where, under his personal supervision, specially trained experts manufacture these products. Currently, the facility covers about seven acres, but there’s plenty of room for expansion since Edison wisely bought over forty acres of land to be ready for future developments.
Not only is the Silver Lake works used for the manufacture of the chemical substances employed in the batteries, but it is the plant at which the Edison primary battery is wholly assembled and made up for distribution to customers. This in itself is a business of no small magnitude, having grown steadily on its merits year by year until it has now arrived at a point where its sales run into the hundreds of thousands of cells per annum, furnished largely to the steam railroads of the country for their signal service.
Not only is the Silver Lake facility used to produce the chemical substances needed for the batteries, but it's also where the Edison primary battery is fully assembled and prepared for distribution to customers. This alone is a significant business, having steadily grown in reputation year after year until it now reaches hundreds of thousands of cells sold each year, primarily to the steam railroads across the country for their signaling services.
As to the storage battery, the plant at Silver Lake is responsible only for the production of the chemical compounds, nickel-hydrate and iron oxide, which enter into its construction. All the mechanical parts, the nickel plating, the manufacture of nickel flake, the assembling and testing, are carried on at the Orange works in two of the large concrete buildings above referred to. A visit to this part of the plant reveals an amazing fertility of resourcefulness and ingenuity in the devising of the special machines and appliances employed in constructing the mechanical parts of these cells, for it is practically impossible to fashion them by means of machinery and tools to be found in the open market, notwithstanding the immense variety that may be there obtained.
Regarding the storage battery, the facility at Silver Lake is only responsible for producing the chemical compounds, nickel-hydrate and iron oxide, that are used in its construction. All the mechanical components, nickel plating, nickel flake manufacturing, assembly, and testing are done at the Orange plant in the two large concrete buildings mentioned earlier. A visit to this part of the plant showcases incredible resourcefulness and creativity in designing the specialized machines and tools used to create the mechanical parts of these cells, as it is nearly impossible to create them using standard machinery and tools available on the open market, despite the wide variety that can be found there.
Since Edison completed his final series of investigations on his storage battery and brought it to its present state of perfection, the commercial values have increased by leaps and bounds. The battery, as it was originally put out some years ago, made for itself an enviable reputation; but with its improved form there has come a vast increase of business. Although the largest of the concrete buildings where its manufacture is carried on is over four hundred feet long and four stories in height, it has already become necessary to plan extensions and enlargements of the plant in order to provide for the production of batteries to fill the present demands. It was not until the summer of 1909 that Edison was willing to pronounce the final verdict of satisfaction with regard to this improved form of storage battery; but subsequent commercial results have justified his judgment, and it is not too much to predict that in all probability the business will assume gigantic proportions within a very few years. At the present time (1910) the Edison storage-battery enterprise is in its early stages of growth, and its status may be compared with that of the electric-light system about the year 1881.
Since Edison finished his last set of tests on his storage battery and perfected it, the commercial value has skyrocketed. The battery, as it was first introduced a few years ago, built a strong reputation for itself; but with its upgraded version, there has been a huge boost in business. Even though the largest building where it's produced is over four hundred feet long and four stories high, it's already necessary to plan for expansions to meet the current demand for batteries. It wasn't until the summer of 1909 that Edison was ready to declare his complete satisfaction with this improved storage battery; however, the commercial success that followed has proven him right, and it's fair to predict that the business will likely grow to massive proportions in just a few years. As of now (1910), the Edison storage-battery business is still in its early growth stages, and its status can be compared to that of the electric-light system around 1881.
There is one more industry, though of comparatively small extent, that is included in the activities of the Orange works, namely, the manufacture and sale of the Bates numbering machine. This is a well-known article of commerce, used in mercantile establishments for the stamping of consecutive, duplicate, and manifold numbers on checks and other documents. It is not an invention of Edison, but the organization owning it, together with the patent rights, were acquired by him some years ago, and he has since continued and enlarged the business both in scope and volume, besides, of course, improving and perfecting the apparatus itself. These machines are known everywhere throughout the country, and while the annual sales are of comparatively moderate amount in comparison with the totals of the other Edison industries at Orange, they represent in the aggregate a comfortable and encouraging business.
There’s one more industry, although it's relatively small, that's part of the activities at the Orange works: the manufacturing and selling of the Bates numbering machine. This is a well-known commercial product used in businesses to stamp consecutive, duplicate, and multiple numbers on checks and other documents. It wasn't invented by Edison, but he acquired the organization that owned it, along with the patent rights, several years ago. Since then, he has continued to grow the business both in scope and volume, while also making improvements to the machine itself. These machines are recognized all over the country, and while their annual sales are relatively modest compared to the totals of other Edison industries at Orange, they still represent a solid and encouraging business overall.
In this brief outline review of the flourishing and extensive commercial enterprises centred around the Orange laboratory, the facts, it is believed, contain a complete refutation of the idea that an inventor cannot be a business man. They also bear abundant evidence of the compatibility of these two widely divergent gifts existing, even to a high degree, in the same person. A striking example of the correctness of this proposition is afforded in the present case, when it is borne in mind that these various industries above described (whose annual sales run into many millions of dollars) owe not only their very creation (except the Bates machine) and existence to Edison's inventive originality and commercial initiative, but also their continued growth and prosperity to his incessant activities in dealing with their multifarious business problems. In publishing a portrait of Edison this year, one of the popular magazines placed under it this caption: "Were the Age called upon to pay Thomas A. Edison all it owes to him, the Age would have to make an assignment." The present chapter will have thrown some light on the idiosyncrasies of Edison as financier and as manufacturer, and will have shown that while the claim thus suggested may be quite good, it will certainly never be pressed or collected.
In this brief overview of the thriving and extensive commercial ventures centered around the Orange laboratory, the details suggest a solid argument against the belief that an inventor can't be a businessman. They also provide plenty of evidence that these two very different skills can exist, even to a high degree, in the same person. A striking example of this idea is evident in this case, considering that the various industries mentioned (which generate annual sales in the millions) owe their creation (except for the Bates machine) and existence to Edison's inventive creativity and business drive, as well as their ongoing growth and success to his tireless efforts in addressing their diverse business challenges. When a popular magazine published a portrait of Edison this year, it included the caption: "If the Age were to pay Thomas A. Edison what it owes him, it would have to declare bankruptcy." This chapter will shed some light on Edison’s quirks as a financier and manufacturer, and it will show that while the claim suggested may be quite valid, it will certainly never be enforced or collected.
CHAPTER XXVII
THE VALUE OF EDISON'S INVENTIONS TO THE WORLD
IF the world were to take an account of stock, so to speak, and proceed in orderly fashion to marshal its tangible assets in relation to dollars and cents, the natural resources of our globe, from centre to circumference, would head the list. Next would come inventors, whose value to the world as an asset could be readily estimated from an increase of its wealth resulting from the actual transformations of these resources into items of convenience and comfort through the exercise of their inventive ingenuity.
IF the world were to take stock, so to speak, and systematically organize its tangible assets in terms of dollars and cents, the natural resources of our planet, from the center to the edge, would top the list. Following that would be inventors, whose value as an asset could be easily measured by the increase in wealth resulting from the actual conversion of these resources into items of convenience and comfort through their creative ingenuity.
Inventors of practical devices may be broadly divided into two classes—first, those who may be said to have made two blades of grass grow where only one grew before; and, second, great inventors, who have made grass grow plentifully on hitherto unproductive ground. The vast majority of practical inventors belong to and remain in the first of these divisions, but there have been, and probably always will be, a less number who, by reason of their greater achievements, are entitled to be included in both classes. Of these latter, Thomas Alva Edison is one, but in the pages of history he stands conspicuously pre-eminent—a commanding towering figure, even among giants.
Inventors of practical devices can be generally divided into two groups: first, those who have made two blades of grass grow where only one used to grow; and second, the great inventors who have made grass grow abundantly on previously unproductive land. Most practical inventors fall into the first category and remain there, but there have been—and probably always will be—a smaller number who, because of their significant achievements, deserve recognition in both groups. Among these, Thomas Alva Edison stands out notably in history—a towering figure, even among giants.
The activities of Edison have been of such great range, and his conquests in the domains of practical arts so extensive and varied, that it is somewhat difficult to estimate with any satisfactory degree of accuracy the money value of his inventions to the world of to-day, even after making due allowance for the work of other great inventors and the propulsive effect of large amounts of capital thrown into the enterprises which took root, wholly or in part, through the productions of his genius and energies. This difficulty will be apparent, for instance, when we consider his telegraph and telephone inventions. These were absorbed in enterprises already existing, and were the means of assisting their rapid growth and expansion, particularly the telephone industry. Again, in considering the fact that Edison was one of the first in the field to design and perfect a practical and operative electric railway, the main features of which are used in all electric roads of to-day, we are confronted with the problem as to what proportion of their colossal investment and earnings should be ascribed to him.
Edison's work has been so wide-ranging, and his achievements in practical arts so extensive and diverse, that it's quite challenging to accurately assess the monetary value of his inventions to today's world. This is true even after considering the contributions of other major inventors and the significant amounts of capital invested in projects that were made possible, partially or completely, by his creativity and efforts. This challenge becomes clear when we look at his telegraph and telephone inventions, which were incorporated into existing companies and contributed to their rapid growth, especially in the telephone sector. Additionally, given that Edison was one of the pioneers in designing and perfecting a practical electric railway, whose key features are still used in today’s electric rail systems, we face the issue of determining what portion of their massive investments and profits can be credited to him.
Difficulties are multiplied when we pause for a moment to think of Edison's influence on collateral branches of business. In the public mind he is credited with the invention of the incandescent electric light, the phonograph, and other widely known devices; but how few realize his actual influence on other trades that are not generally thought of in connection with these things. For instance, let us note what a prominent engine builder, the late Gardiner C. Sims, has said: "Watt, Corliss, and Porter brought forward steam-engines to a high state of proficiency, yet it remained for Mr. Edison to force better proportions, workmanship, designs, use of metals, regulation, the solving of the complex problems of high speed and endurance, and the successful development of the shaft governor. Mr. Edison is preeminent in the realm of engineering."
Challenges increase when we take a moment to consider Edison's impact on related business sectors. In the public's perception, he's known for inventing the incandescent electric light, the phonograph, and other famous devices; however, few recognize his significant influence on other industries that aren’t typically associated with these inventions. For example, let's look at what a prominent engine builder, the late Gardiner C. Sims, has said: "Watt, Corliss, and Porter advanced steam engines to a high level of excellence, yet it was Mr. Edison who pushed for better proportions, craftsmanship, designs, material use, regulation, and tackled the complex challenges of high speed and endurance, as well as successfully developing the shaft governor. Mr. Edison stands out in the field of engineering."
The phenomenal growth of the copper industry was due to a rapid and ever-increasing demand, owing to the exploitation of the telephone, electric light, electric motor, and electric railway industries. Without these there might never have been the romance of "Coppers" and the rise and fall of countless fortunes. And although one cannot estimate in definite figures the extent of Edison's influence in the enormous increase of copper production, it is to be remembered that his basic inventions constitute a most important factor in the demand for the metal. Besides, one must also give him the credit, as already noted, for having recognized the necessity for a pure quality of copper for electric conductors, and for his persistence in having compelled the manufacturers of that period to introduce new and additional methods of refinement so as to bring about that result, which is now a sine qua non.
The tremendous growth of the copper industry was driven by a rapid and increasing demand, thanks to the rise of the telephone, electric light, electric motor, and electric railway industries. Without these developments, the story of "Coppers" and the rise and fall of countless fortunes might never have happened. While it’s hard to quantify Edison's exact impact on the massive increase in copper production, it’s important to acknowledge that his key inventions played a significant role in boosting the demand for the metal. Additionally, we must credit him, as mentioned earlier, for recognizing the need for high-quality copper for electric conductors and for his determination in pushing manufacturers of that time to adopt new and improved refining methods to achieve that standard, which is now essential.
Still considering his influence on other staples and collateral trades, let us enumerate briefly and in a general manner some of the more important and additional ones that have been not merely stimulated, but in many cases the business and sales have been directly increased and new arts established through the inventions of this one man—namely, iron, steel, brass, zinc, nickel, platinum ($5 per ounce in 1878, now $26 an ounce), rubber, oils, wax, bitumen, various chemical compounds, belting, boilers, injectors, structural steel, iron tubing, glass, silk, cotton, porcelain, fine woods, slate, marble, electrical measuring instruments, miscellaneous machinery, coal, wire, paper, building materials, sapphires, and many others.
Still considering his impact on various essential goods and related industries, let's briefly list some of the more significant ones that have not only been stimulated but, in many instances, have seen direct increases in business and sales, along with the establishment of new trades due to the inventions of this one man—namely, iron, steel, brass, zinc, nickel, platinum ($5 per ounce in 1878, now $26 an ounce), rubber, oils, wax, bitumen, various chemical compounds, belting, boilers, injectors, structural steel, iron tubing, glass, silk, cotton, porcelain, fine woods, slate, marble, electrical measuring instruments, miscellaneous machinery, coal, wire, paper, building materials, sapphires, and many others.
The question before us is, To what extent has Edison added to the wealth of the world by his inventions and his energy and perseverance? It will be noted from the foregoing that no categorical answer can be offered to such a question, but sufficient material can be gathered from a statistical review of the commercial arts directly influenced to afford an approximate idea of the increase in national wealth that has been affected by or has come into being through the practical application of his ideas.
The question we need to consider is: How much has Edison contributed to the world’s wealth through his inventions, energy, and determination? As mentioned earlier, we can’t provide a straightforward answer to this question, but we can gather enough information from a statistical review of the commercial industries directly impacted to get a rough idea of the increase in national wealth brought about by or resulting from the practical implementation of his ideas.
First of all, as to inventions capable of fairly definite estimate, let us mention the incandescent electric light and systems of distribution of electric light, heat, and power, which may justly be considered as the crowning inventions of Edison's life. Until October 21, 1879, there was nothing in existence resembling our modern incandescent lamp. On that date, as we have seen in a previous chapter, Edison's labors culminated in his invention of a practical incandescent electric lamp embodying absolutely all the essentials of the lamp of to-day, thus opening to the world the doors of a new art and industry. To-day there are in the United States more than 41,000,000 of these lamps, connected to existing central-station circuits in active operation.
First of all, when it comes to inventions that can be clearly assessed, we should highlight the incandescent electric light and the systems for distributing electric light, heat, and power, which can rightly be seen as the pinnacle of Edison's inventions. Before October 21, 1879, there was nothing like our modern incandescent lamp. On that date, as mentioned in a previous chapter, Edison's efforts resulted in the creation of a practical incandescent electric lamp that included all the key features of today’s lamp, thereby opening the doors to a whole new field and industry. Today, there are over 41,000,000 of these lamps in the United States, connected to operational central-station circuits.
Such circuits necessarily imply the existence of central stations with their equipment. Until the beginning of 1882 there were only a few arc-lighting stations in existence for the limited distribution of current. At the present time there are over 6000 central stations in this country for the distribution of electric current for light, heat, and power, with capital obligations amounting to not less than $1,000,000,000. Besides the above-named 41,000,000 incandescent lamps connected to their mains, there are about 500,000 arc lamps and 150,000 motors, using 750,000 horse-power, besides countless fan motors and electric heating and cooking appliances.
Such systems necessarily involve the presence of central stations equipped with the necessary technology. Up until early 1882, there were only a handful of arc-lighting stations available for limited current distribution. Today, there are over 6,000 central stations across the country distributing electric current for lighting, heating, and power, with total investments exceeding $1 billion. In addition to the 41 million incandescent lamps connected to their networks, there are about 500,000 arc lamps and 150,000 motors using 750,000 horsepower, along with countless fan motors and various electric heating and cooking devices.
When it is stated that the gross earnings of these central stations approximate the sum of $225,000,000 yearly, the significant import of these statistics of an art that came so largely from Edison's laboratory about thirty years ago will undoubtedly be apparent.
When we say that the total earnings of these central stations are around $225,000,000 each year, the importance of these figures, especially considering that this technology originated mostly from Edison's lab about thirty years ago, will definitely be clear.
But the above are not by any means all the facts relating to incandescent electric lighting in the United States, for in addition to central stations there are upward of 100,000 isolated or private plants in mills, factories, steamships, hotels, theatres, etc., owned by the persons or concerns who operate them. These plants represent an approximate investment of $500,000,000, and the connection of not less than 25,000,000 incandescent lamps or their equivalent.
But the above are not all the facts about incandescent electric lighting in the United States. In addition to central stations, there are over 100,000 isolated or private plants in mills, factories, steamships, hotels, theaters, etc., owned by the individuals or companies that operate them. These plants represent an estimated investment of $500,000,000, and they are connected to at least 25,000,000 incandescent lamps or their equivalent.
Then there are the factories where these incandescent lamps are made, about forty in number, representing a total investment that may be approximated at $25,000,000. It is true that many of these factories are operated by other than the interests which came into control of the Edison patents (General Electric Company), but the 150,000,000 incandescent electric lamps now annually made are broadly covered in principle by Edison's fundamental ideas and patents.
Then there are the factories where these incandescent lamps are made, about forty in total, representing an estimated investment of around $25,000,000. It's true that many of these factories are run by companies other than those that control the Edison patents (General Electric Company), but the 150,000,000 incandescent electric lamps produced each year are largely based on Edison's core ideas and patents.
It will be noted that these figures are all in round numbers, but they are believed to be well within the mark, being primarily founded upon the special reports of the Census Bureau issued in 1902 and 1907, with the natural increase from that time computed by experts who are in position to obtain the facts. It would be manifestly impossible to give exact figures of such a gigantic and swiftly moving industry, whose totals increase from week to week.
It should be noted that these figures are all rounded, but they are considered to be accurate, based mainly on the special reports from the Census Bureau published in 1902 and 1907, with natural growth from that time calculated by experts who have access to the data. It would clearly be impossible to provide exact numbers for such a massive and rapidly changing industry, whose totals rise week by week.
The reader will naturally be disposed to ask whether it is intended to claim that Edison has brought about all this magnificent growth of the electric-lighting art. The answer to this is decidedly in the negative, for the fact is that he laid some of the foundation and erected a building thereon, and in the natural progressive order of things other inventors of more or less fame have laid substructures or added a wing here and a story there until the resultant great structure has attained such proportions as to evoke the admiration of the beholder; but the old foundation and the fundamental building still remain to support other parts. In other words, Edison created the incandescent electric lamp, and invented certain broad and fundamental systems of distribution of current, with all the essential devices of detail necessary for successful operation. These formed a foundation. He also spent great sums of money and devoted several years of patient labor in the early practical exploitation of the dynamo and central station and isolated plants, often under, adverse and depressing circumstances, with a dogged determination that outlived an opposition steadily threatening defeat. These efforts resulted in the firm commercial establishment of modern electric lighting. It is true that many important inventions of others have a distinguished place in the art as it is exploited today, but the fact remains that the broad essentials, such as the incandescent lamp, systems of distribution, and some important details, are not only universally used, but are as necessary to-day for successful commercial practice as they were when Edison invented them many years ago.
The reader will likely wonder if it’s being claimed that Edison is solely responsible for the impressive growth of electric lighting. The answer is definitely no, because while he laid some of the groundwork and built upon it, other inventors of varying degrees of fame have added foundational elements and improvements over time, creating a remarkable structure that commands admiration. However, the original foundation and core building still exist to support the additions. In other words, Edison developed the incandescent electric lamp and created some fundamental systems for distributing electricity, along with all the necessary details for successful operation. These formed a solid base. He also invested significant amounts of money and spent several years tirelessly working on the practical development of the dynamo, central stations, and standalone plants, often facing tough and discouraging situations, with a determination that outlasted ongoing opposition. These efforts led to the solid commercial establishment of modern electric lighting. It’s true that many significant inventions by others are important in today’s electric lighting industry, but the key components like the incandescent lamp, distribution systems, and some crucial details are still essential today for successful commercial practice as they were when Edison first invented them many years ago.
The electric railway next claims our consideration, but we are immediately confronted by a difficulty which seems insurmountable when we attempt to formulate any definite estimate of the value and influence of Edison's pioneer work and inventions. There is one incontrovertible fact—namely, that he was the first man to devise, construct, and operate from a central station a practicable, life-size electric railroad, which was capable of transporting and did transport passengers and freight at variable speeds over varying grades, and under complete control of the operator. These are the essential elements in all electric railroading of the present day; but while Edison's original broad ideas are embodied in present practice, the perfection of the modern electric railway is greatly due to the labors and inventions of a large number of other well-known inventors. There was no reason why Edison could not have continued the commercial development of the electric railway after he had helped to show its practicability in 1880, 1881, and 1882, just as he had completed his lighting system, had it not been that his financial allies of the period lacked faith in the possibilities of electric railroads, and therefore declined to furnish the money necessary for the purpose of carrying on the work.
The electric railway now deserves our attention, but we immediately face a challenge that seems impossible to overcome when we try to define the value and impact of Edison's pioneering work and inventions. One undeniable fact is that he was the first person to design, build, and operate a practical, full-sized electric railroad from a central station, which successfully transported passengers and freight at varying speeds and grades, all under the operator's complete control. These are the fundamental elements of modern electric railroading. While Edison's original broad ideas are present in today's practices, the advancement of the modern electric railway owes much to the efforts and inventions of many other well-known inventors. There was no reason Edison couldn't have continued developing the electric railway commercially after demonstrating its feasibility in 1880, 1881, and 1882, just as he completed his lighting system, if not for the fact that his financial backers at the time doubted the potential of electric railroads and thus refused to provide the funds needed to continue the work.
With these facts in mind, we shall ask the reader to assign to Edison a due proportion of credit for his pioneer and basic work in relation to the prodigious development of electric railroading that has since taken place. The statistics of 1908 for American street and elevated railways show that within twenty-five years the electric-railway industry has grown to embrace 38,812 miles of track on streets and for elevated railways, operated under the ownership of 1238 separate companies, whose total capitalization amounted to the enormous sum of $4,123,834,598. In the equipments owned by such companies there are included 68,636 electric cars and 17,568 trailers and others, making a total of 86,204 of such vehicles. These cars and equipments earned over $425,000,000 in 1907, in giving the public transportation, at a cost, including transfers, of a little over three cents per passenger, for whom a fifteen-mile ride would be possible. It is the cheapest transportation in the world.
Keeping these facts in mind, we ask the reader to give Edison appropriate credit for his groundbreaking and foundational work related to the remarkable growth of electric railways that has occurred since. The statistics from 1908 for American street and elevated railways show that within twenty-five years, the electric railway industry has expanded to include 38,812 miles of track on streets and for elevated railways, operated by 1,238 different companies, with a total capitalization of an astounding $4,123,834,598. These companies own 68,636 electric cars and 17,568 trailers and other vehicles, making a total of 86,204 such units. These cars and equipment generated over $425,000,000 in 1907 by providing public transportation at a cost, including transfers, of just over three cents per passenger, allowing for a fifteen-mile ride. It is the cheapest transportation in the world.
Some mention should also be made of the great electrical works of the country, in which the dynamos, motors, and other varied paraphernalia are made for electric lighting, electric railway, and other purposes. The largest of these works is undoubtedly that of the General Electric Company at Schenectady, New York, a continuation and enormous enlargement of the shops which Edison established there in 1886. This plant at the present time embraces over 275 acres, of which sixty acres are covered by fifty large and over one hundred small buildings; besides which the company also owns other large plants elsewhere, representing a total investment approximating the sum of $34,850,000 up to 1908. The productions of the General Electric Company alone average annual sales of nearly $75,000,000, but they do not comprise the total of the country's manufactures in these lines.
Some mention should also be made of the major electrical facilities in the country, where dynamos, motors, and various other equipment are manufactured for electric lighting, electric railways, and other uses. The largest of these facilities is undoubtedly the General Electric Company in Schenectady, New York, which is a continuation and huge expansion of the shops that Edison set up there in 1886. This plant currently covers over 275 acres, with sixty acres taken up by fifty large and over one hundred small buildings. Additionally, the company owns other large facilities in different locations, representing a total investment of around $34,850,000 as of 1908. The General Electric Company alone records average annual sales of nearly $75,000,000, but this does not include the entirety of the country’s manufacturing in these areas.
Turning our attention now to the telephone, we again meet a condition that calls for thoughtful consideration before we can properly appreciate how much the growth of this industry owes to Edison's inventive genius. In another place there has already been told the story of the telephone, from which we have seen that to Alexander Graham Bell is due the broad idea of transmission of speech by means of an electrical circuit; also that he invented appropriate instruments and devices through which he accomplished this result, although not to that extent which gave promise of any great commercial practicability for the telephone as it then existed. While the art was in this inefficient condition, Edison went to work on the subject, and in due time, as we have already learned, invented and brought out the carbon transmitter, which is universally acknowledged to have been the needed device that gave to the telephone the element of commercial practicability, and has since led to its phenomenally rapid adoption and world-wide use. It matters not that others were working in the same direction, Edison was legally adjudicated to have been the first to succeed in point of time, and his inventions were put into actual use, and may be found in principle in every one of the 7,000,000 telephones which are estimated to be employed in the country at the present day. Basing the statements upon facts shown by the Census reports of 1902 and 1907, and adding thereto the growth of the industry since that time, we find on a conservative estimate that at this writing the investment has been not less than $800,000,000 in now existing telephone systems, while no fewer than 10,500,000,000 talks went over the lines during the year 1908. These figures relate only to telephone systems, and do not include any details regarding the great manufacturing establishments engaged in the construction of telephone apparatus, of which there is a production amounting to at least $15,000,000 per annum.
Turning our attention now to the telephone, we encounter a situation that requires careful thought before we can fully appreciate how much this industry owes to Edison's inventive genius. In another place, we've already discussed the story of the telephone, which shows that Alexander Graham Bell is credited with the broad concept of transmitting speech through an electrical circuit. He also invented the necessary instruments and devices to achieve this, although at that time, it didn't seem commercially feasible for the telephone as it existed. While the technology was still inefficient, Edison began working on the topic, and eventually, as we've learned, he created and introduced the carbon transmitter. This device is widely recognized as the breakthrough that made the telephone commercially viable, leading to its incredibly rapid adoption and global usage. It doesn't matter that others were also working towards the same goal; Edison was legally recognized as the first to succeed at that time, and his inventions are incorporated in principle in every one of the estimated 7,000,000 telephones currently in use in the country. Based on facts from the Census reports of 1902 and 1907, and considering the industry's growth since then, we can conservatively estimate that as of now, the investment in existing telephone systems has reached at least $800,000,000, while over 10,500,000,000 conversations took place over the lines in 1908. These figures pertain solely to telephone systems and do not account for the significant manufacturing plants producing telephone equipment, which has an annual output of at least $15,000,000.
Leaving the telephone, let us now turn our attention to the telegraph, and endeavor to show as best we can some idea of the measure to which it has been affected by Edison's inventions. Although, as we have seen in a previous part of this book, his earliest fame arose from his great practical work in telegraphic inventions and improvements, there is no way in which any definite computation can be made of the value of his contributions in the art except, perhaps, in the case of his quadruplex, through which alone it is estimated that there has been saved from $15,000,000 to $20,000,000 in the cost of line construction in this country. If this were the only thing that he had ever accomplished, it would entitle him to consideration as an inventor of note. The quadruplex, however, has other material advantages, but how far they and the natural growth of the business have contributed to the investment and earnings of the telegraph companies, is beyond practicable computation.
Leaving aside the telephone, let’s now focus on the telegraph and try to illustrate how much Edison's inventions have impacted it. As we discussed earlier in this book, his initial fame came from his significant work in telegraphic inventions and enhancements. However, it’s challenging to measure the value of his contributions in this field, except perhaps with his quadruplex. This innovation alone is estimated to have saved between $15 million to $20 million in line construction costs in the United States. Even if this were the only achievement he had, it would still make him a notable inventor. The quadruplex also has other material benefits, but determining how much these and the natural growth of the business have influenced the investment and earnings of telegraph companies is beyond accurate calculation.
It would, perhaps, be interesting to speculate upon what might have been the growth of the telegraph and the resultant benefit to the community had Edison's automatic telegraph inventions been allowed to take their legitimate place in the art, but we shall not allow ourselves to indulge in flights of fancy, as the value of this chapter rests not upon conjecture, but only upon actual fact. Nor shall we attempt to offer any statistics regarding Edison's numerous inventions relating to telegraphs and kindred devices, such as stock tickers, relays, magnets, rheotomes, repeaters, printing telegraphs, messenger calls, etc., on which he was so busily occupied as an inventor and manufacturer during the ten years that began with January, 1869. The principles of many of these devices are still used in the arts, but have become so incorporated in other devices as to be inseparable, and cannot now be dealt with separately. To show what they mean, however, it might be noted that New York City alone has 3000 stock "tickers," consuming 50,000 miles of record tape every year.
It might be interesting to think about how the telegraph could have developed and the benefits it could have brought to the community if Edison's automatic telegraph inventions had been given their rightful place in the field, but we won’t engage in speculation, as the importance of this chapter relies on actual facts rather than guesses. We also won’t provide statistics about Edison's many inventions related to telegraphs and similar devices, like stock tickers, relays, magnets, rheotomes, repeaters, printing telegraphs, and messenger calls, which he worked on as an inventor and manufacturer during the ten years starting in January 1869. The principles behind many of these devices are still used today, but they have become so integrated into other technologies that they can't be separated anymore. To illustrate their significance, it's worth mentioning that New York City alone has 3,000 stock "tickers," which consume 50,000 miles of record tape each year.
Turning now to other important arts and industries which have been created by Edison's inventions, and in which he is at this time taking an active personal interest, let us visit Orange, New Jersey. When his present laboratory was nearing completion in 1887, he wrote to Mr. J. Hood Wright, a partner in the firm of Drexel, Morgan & Co.: "My ambition is to build up a great industrial works in the Orange Valley, starting in a small way and gradually working up."
Turning now to other significant arts and industries that have emerged from Edison's inventions, and in which he is currently taking an active personal interest, let’s take a look at Orange, New Jersey. When his current laboratory was almost finished in 1887, he wrote to Mr. J. Hood Wright, a partner at Drexel, Morgan & Co.: "My ambition is to establish a major industrial operation in the Orange Valley, starting small and gradually expanding."
In this plant, which represents an investment approximating the sum of $4,000,000, are grouped a number of industrial enterprises of which Edison is either the sole or controlling owner and the guiding spirit. These enterprises are the National Phonograph Company, the Edison Business Phonograph Company, the Edison Phonograph Works, the Edison Manufacturing Company, the Edison Storage Battery Company, and the Bates Manufacturing Company. The importance of these industries will be apparent when it is stated that at this plant the maximum pay-roll shows the employment of over 4200 persons, with annual earnings in salaries and wages of more than $2,750,000.
In this facility, which represents an investment of about $4,000,000, several industrial enterprises are gathered, where Edison is either the sole owner or has controlling ownership and serves as the driving force. These enterprises include the National Phonograph Company, the Edison Business Phonograph Company, the Edison Phonograph Works, the Edison Manufacturing Company, the Edison Storage Battery Company, and the Bates Manufacturing Company. The significance of these industries becomes clear when considering that this facility has a maximum payroll of over 4,200 employees, with annual earnings exceeding $2,750,000 in salaries and wages.
In considering the phonograph in its commercial aspect, and endeavoring to arrive at some idea of the world's estimate of the value of this invention, we feel the ground more firm under our feet, for Edison has in later years controlled its manufacture and sale. It will be remembered that the phonograph lay dormant, commercially speaking, for about ten years after it came into being, and then later invention reduced it to a device capable of more popular utility. A few years of rather unsatisfactory commercial experience brought about a reorganization, through which Edison resumed possession of the business. It has since been continued under his general direction and ownership, and he has made a great many additional inventions tending to improve the machine in all its parts.
When we look at the phonograph from a business perspective and try to understand how the world values this invention, we feel more confident because Edison has been in control of its production and sales in recent years. It’s important to note that the phonograph was mostly inactive in the market for about ten years after it was created, and later innovations made it a more practical device for the general public. After a few years of disappointing commercial results, there was a reorganization that allowed Edison to take back the business. Since then, it has operated under his overall guidance and ownership, and he has introduced many new inventions to improve the machine in every aspect.
The uses made of the phonograph up to this time have been of four kinds, generally speaking—first, and principally, for amusement; second, for instruction in languages; third, for business, in the dictation of correspondence; and fourth, for sentimental reasons in preserving the voices of friends. No separate figures are available to show the extent of its employment in the second and fourth classes, as they are probably included in machines coming under the first subdivision. Under this head we find that there have been upward of 1,310,000 phonographs sold during the last twenty years, with and for which there have been made and sold no fewer than 97,845,000 records of a musical or other character. Phonographic records are now being manufactured at Orange at the rate of 75,000 a day, the annual sale of phonographs and records being approximately $7,000,000, including business phonographs. This does not include blank records, of which large numbers have also been supplied to the public.
The phonograph has primarily been used in four ways up to now—first and foremost, for entertainment; second, for teaching languages; third, for business, in dictating correspondence; and fourth, for sentimental reasons, to capture the voices of friends. There aren’t specific numbers to show how much it’s used for teaching and sentimental purposes, as those likely fall under entertainment. Over the past twenty years, more than 1,310,000 phonographs have been sold, along with about 97,845,000 records of music or other types. Phonograph records are currently produced in Orange at a rate of 75,000 per day, with annual sales of phonographs and records totaling around $7,000,000, which includes business phonographs. This figure doesn’t account for blank records, which have also been supplied in large quantities.
The adoption of the business phonograph has not been characterized by the unanimity that obtained in the case of the one used merely for amusement, as its use involves some changes in methods that business men are slow to adopt until they realize the resulting convenience and economy. Although it is only a few years since the business phonograph has begun to make some headway, it is not difficult to appreciate that Edison's prediction in 1878 as to the value of such an appliance is being realized, when we find that up to this time the sales run up to 12,695 in number. At the present time the annual sales of the business phonographs and supplies, cylinders, etc., are not less than $350,000.
The adoption of the business phonograph hasn’t been as unanimous as the one used just for fun, since its use requires changes in methods that business people are slow to embrace until they see the convenience and cost savings it offers. Even though the business phonograph has only started gaining traction in recent years, it’s clear that Edison's prediction from 1878 about its value is coming true, as we see sales reach 12,695 units so far. Currently, the annual sales of business phonographs and related supplies, like cylinders, are at least $350,000.
We must not forget that the basic patent of Edison on the phonograph has long since expired, thus throwing open to the world the wonderful art of reproducing human speech and other sounds. The world was not slow to take advantage of the fact, hence there are in the field numerous other concerns in the same business. It is conservatively estimated by those who know the trade and are in position to form an opinion, that the figures above given represent only about one-half of the entire business of the country in phonographs, records, cylinders, and supplies.
We must remember that Edison's original patent for the phonograph has long expired, which has opened up the amazing art of reproducing human speech and other sounds to everyone. The world quickly jumped at the opportunity, leading to many other companies entering the same market. Experts in the industry estimate that the numbers mentioned earlier represent only about half of the total business in the country related to phonographs, records, cylinders, and supplies.
Taking next his inventions that pertain to a more recently established but rapidly expanding branch of business that provides for the amusement of the public, popularly known as "motion pictures," we also find a general recognition of value created. Referring the reader to a previous chapter for a discussion of Edison's standing as a pioneer inventor in this art, let us glance at the commercial proportions of this young but lusty business, whose ramifications extend to all but the most remote and primitive hamlets of our country.
Taking next his inventions related to a more recently established but quickly growing branch of business that offers entertainment to the public, commonly known as "motion pictures," we also see a widespread acknowledgment of the value created. Referring the reader to a previous chapter for a discussion of Edison's role as a pioneering inventor in this field, let's take a look at the commercial scale of this young but thriving industry, whose reach extends to almost every small and remote village in our country.
The manufacture of the projecting machines and accessories, together with the reproduction of films, is carried on at the Orange Valley plant, and from the inception of the motion-picture business to the present time there have been made upward of 16,000 projecting machines and many million feet of films carrying small photographs of moving objects. Although the motion-picture business, as a commercial enterprise, is still in its youth, it is of sufficient moment to call for the annual production of thousands of machines and many million feet of films in Edison's shops, having a sale value of not less than $750,000. To produce the originals from which these Edison films are made, there have been established two "studios," the largest of which is in the Bronx, New York City.
The production of projecting machines and accessories, along with film reproduction, takes place at the Orange Valley plant. Since the beginning of the motion-picture industry, over 16,000 projecting machines and millions of feet of films featuring small images of moving objects have been created. While the motion-picture industry is still relatively young as a commercial venture, it’s significant enough to require the annual production of thousands of machines and millions of feet of films in Edison's facilities, valued at no less than $750,000. To create the originals for these Edison films, two "studios" have been established, with the largest one located in the Bronx, New York City.
In this, as well as in the phonograph business, there are many other manufacturers in the field. Indeed, the annual product of the Edison Manufacturing Company in this line is only a fractional part of the total that is absorbed by the 8000 or more motion-picture theatres and exhibitions that are in operation in the United States at the present time, and which represent an investment of some $45,000,000. Licensees under Edison patents in this country alone produce upward of 60,000,000 feet of films annually, containing more than a billion and a half separate photographs. To what extent the motion-picture business may grow in the not remote future it is impossible to conjecture, for it has taken a place in the front rank of rapidly increasing enterprises.
In this industry, along with the phonograph business, there are many other manufacturers competing. In fact, the annual output of the Edison Manufacturing Company in this area is just a small fraction of the total that is consumed by the 8,000 or more movie theaters and exhibitions currently operating in the United States, which represent an investment of about $45 million. Licensees under Edison patents in this country alone produce over 60 million feet of films each year, containing more than a billion and a half individual images. It’s hard to predict how much the movie business might grow in the near future, as it has established itself among the top rapidly expanding industries.
The manufacture and sale of the Edison-Lalande primary battery, conducted by the Edison Manufacturing Company at the Orange Valley plant, is a business of no mean importance. Beginning about twenty years ago with a battery that, without polarizing, would furnish large currents specially adapted for gas-engine ignition and other important purposes, the business has steadily grown in magnitude until the present output amounts to about 125,000 cells annually; the total number of cells put into the hands of the public up to date being approximately 1,500,000. It will be readily conceded that to most men this alone would be an enterprise of a lifetime, and sufficient in itself to satisfy a moderate ambition. But, although it has yielded a considerable profit to Edison and gives employment to many people, it is only one of the many smaller enterprises that owe an existence to his inventive ability and commercial activity.
The production and sale of the Edison-Lalande primary battery, managed by the Edison Manufacturing Company at the Orange Valley plant, is a significant business. Starting around twenty years ago with a battery that could provide large currents without polarizing, making it ideal for gas-engine ignition and other important uses, the business has consistently grown, reaching an annual output of about 125,000 cells; the total number of cells distributed to the public so far is around 1,500,000. It’s clear that for most people, this alone would be a lifetime venture and more than enough to fulfill a moderate ambition. However, even though it has generated substantial profits for Edison and provides jobs for many, it's just one of the numerous smaller ventures that have arisen due to his inventive talent and business drive.
So it also is in regard to the mimeograph, whose forerunner, the electric pen, was born of Edison's brain in 1877. He had been long impressed by the desirability of the rapid production of copies of written documents, and, as we have seen by a previous chapter, he invented the electric pen for this purpose, only to improve upon it later with a more desirable device which he called the mimeograph, that is in use, in various forms, at this time. Although the electric pen had a large sale and use in its time, the statistics relating to it are not available. The mimeograph, however, is, and has been for many years, a standard office appliance, and is entitled to consideration, as the total number put into use up to this time is approximately 180,000, valued at $3,500,000, while the annual output is in the neighborhood of 9000 machines, sold for about $150,000, besides the vast quantity of special paper and supplies which its use entails in the production of the many millions of facsimile letters and documents. The extent of production and sale of supplies for the mimeograph may be appreciated when it is stated that they bring annually an equivalent of three times the amount realized from sales of machines. The manufacture and sale of the mimeograph does not come within the enterprises conducted under Edison's personal direction, as he sold out the whole thing some years ago to Mr. A. B. Dick, of Chicago.
So it is with the mimeograph, which evolved from the electric pen, invented by Edison in 1877. He had been keenly aware of the need for quickly producing copies of written documents, and, as noted in a previous chapter, he created the electric pen for this reason, only to later enhance it with a more effective device he named the mimeograph, which is still used in various forms today. Although the electric pen sold well and was widely used in its time, the statistics regarding its use are not available. However, the mimeograph has been a standard office tool for many years and deserves attention, as the total number put into service up to now is around 180,000, valued at $3,500,000. The annual output is about 9,000 machines, sold for approximately $150,000, not to mention the significant amount of special paper and supplies needed for producing millions of facsimile letters and documents. The scale of production and sales for the mimeograph can be understood when we note that these supplies generate an annual revenue equivalent to three times the income from machine sales. The manufacturing and selling of the mimeograph is not part of the ventures managed by Edison himself, as he sold the entire operation several years ago to Mr. A. B. Dick, of Chicago.
In making a somewhat radical change of subject, from duplicating machines to cement, we find ourselves in a field in which Edison has made a most decided impression. The reader has already learned that his entry into this field was, in a manner, accidental, although logically in line with pronounced convictions of many years' standing, and following up the fund of knowledge gained in the magnetic ore-milling business. From being a new-comer in the cement business, his corporation in five years has grown to be the fifth largest producer in the United States, with a still increasing capacity. From the inception of this business there has been a steady and rapid development, resulting in the production of a grand total of over 7,300,000 barrels of cement up to the present date, having a value of about $6,000,000, exclusive of package. At the time of this writing, the rate of production is over 8000 barrels of cement per day, or, say, 2,500,000 barrels per year, having an approximate selling value of a little less than $2,000,000, with prospects of increasing in the near future to a daily output of 10,000 barrels. This enterprise is carried on by a corporation called the Edison Portland Cement Company, in which he is very largely interested, and of which he is the active head and guiding spirit.
Switching gears from duplicating machines to cement, we see that Edison has made a significant impact in this area. The reader already knows that his entry into this field was somewhat accidental, though it logically aligns with his strong beliefs developed over many years, building on the knowledge he gained in the magnetic ore-milling business. In just five years, his company has grown from a newcomer in the cement industry to the fifth largest producer in the United States, with capacity still on the rise. Since the start of this business, there has been consistent and rapid growth, resulting in a total production of over 7,300,000 barrels of cement to date, worth about $6,000,000, not including packaging. As of now, the production rate exceeds 8,000 barrels of cement per day, or around 2,500,000 barrels per year, with an estimated selling value of just under $2,000,000, and prospects for increasing to a daily output of 10,000 barrels in the near future. This venture is managed by the Edison Portland Cement Company, a corporation in which he has a substantial interest and serves as the active leader and driving force.
Had not Edison suspended the manufacture and sale of his storage battery a few years ago because he was not satisfied with it, there might have been given here some noteworthy figures of an extensive business, for the company's books show an astonishing number of orders that were received during the time of the shut-down. He was implored for batteries, but in spite of the fact that good results had been obtained from the 18,000 or 20,000 cells sold some years ago, he adhered firmly to his determination to perfect them to a still higher standard before resuming and continuing their manufacture as a regular commodity. As we have noted in a previous chapter, however, deliveries of the perfected type were begun in the summer of 1909, and since that time the business has continued to grow in the measure indicated by the earlier experience.
Had Edison not stopped making and selling his storage battery a few years ago because he wasn't satisfied with it, we might have seen some impressive figures for a large business, as the company's records show a surprising number of orders that came in during the shutdown. He was urged to make batteries, but despite the good results from the 18,000 or 20,000 cells sold a few years back, he stuck to his decision to improve them to an even higher standard before restarting and continuing their manufacture as a regular product. As we mentioned in a previous chapter, deliveries of the improved version began in the summer of 1909, and since then, the business has continued to grow in line with the earlier experience.
Thus far we have concerned ourselves chiefly with those figures which exhibit the extent of investment and production, but there is another and humanly important side that presents itself for consideration namely, the employment of a vast industrial army of men and women, who earn a living through their connection with some of the arts and industries to which our narrative has direct reference. To this the reader's attention will now be drawn.
So far, we've mainly focused on the numbers that show the level of investment and production, but there's another important aspect to consider: the employment of a large workforce of men and women who make a living through their involvement in some of the arts and industries we've been discussing. We'll now shift our attention to this topic.
The following figures are based upon the Special Reports of the Census Bureau, 1902 and 1907, with additions computed upon the increase that has subsequently taken place. In the totals following is included the compensation paid to salaried officials and clerks. Details relating to telegraph systems are omitted.
The following figures are based on the Special Reports of the Census Bureau from 1902 and 1907, with updates calculated based on the growth that has occurred since then. The totals provided include the salaries paid to officials and clerks. Details about telegraph systems are left out.
Taking the electric light into consideration first, we find that in the central stations of the United States there are not less than an average of 50,000 persons employed, requiring an aggregate yearly payroll of over $40,000,000. This does not include the 100,000 or more isolated electric-light plants scattered throughout the land. Many of these are quite large, and at least one-third of them require one additional helper, thus adding, say, 33,000 employees to the number already mentioned. If we assume as low a wage as $10 per week for each of these helpers, we must add to the foregoing an additional sum of over $17,000,000 paid annually for wages, almost entirely in the isolated incandescent electric lighting field.
Considering electric lighting first, we see that the central stations in the United States employ at least 50,000 people on average, requiring a total yearly payroll of over $40,000,000. This doesn't include the 100,000 or more standalone electric-light plants scattered across the country. Many of these are quite large, and at least one-third of them need one extra helper, adding about 33,000 employees to the total already mentioned. If we assume a low wage of $10 per week for each of these helpers, we need to add over $17,000,000 annually for wages, mostly in the field of isolated incandescent electric lighting.
Central stations and isolated plants consume over 100,000,000 incandescent electric lamps annually, and in the production of these there are engaged about forty factories, on whose pay-rolls appear an average of 14,000 employees, earning an aggregate yearly sum of $8,000,000.
Central stations and standalone facilities use more than 100 million incandescent light bulbs each year, and around forty factories are involved in producing them. These factories have an average of 14,000 workers on their payrolls, earning a total of $8 million annually.
Following the incandescent lamp we must not forget an industry exclusively arising from it and absolutely dependent upon it—namely, that of making fixtures for such lamps, the manufacture of which gives employment to upward of 6000 persons, who annually receive at least $3,750,000 in compensation.
Following the light bulb, we must not overlook an industry that emerged solely because of it and relies entirely on it—specifically, the production of fixtures for these lamps. This sector employs over 6,000 people, who together earn at least $3,750,000 in wages each year.
The detail devices of the incandescent electric lighting system also contribute a large quota to the country's wealth in the millions of dollars paid out in salaries and wages to many thousands of persons who are engaged in their manufacture.
The detailed components of the incandescent electric lighting system also add significantly to the country's wealth through the millions of dollars paid in salaries and wages to the thousands of people involved in their production.
The electric railways of our country show even larger figures than the lighting stations and plants, as they employ on the average over 250,000 persons, whose annual compensation amounts to not less than $155,000,000.
The electric railways in our country have even bigger numbers than the lighting stations and plants, employing an average of over 250,000 people, whose yearly salaries total at least $155,000,000.
In the manufacture of about $50,000,000 worth of dynamos and motors annually, for central-station equipment, isolated plants, electric railways, and other purposes, the manufacturers of the country employ an average of not less than 30,000 people, whose yearly pay-roll amounts to no less a sum than $20,000,000.
In the production of around $50,000,000 worth of dynamos and motors each year for central-station equipment, standalone facilities, electric railways, and other uses, the manufacturers in the country employ at least 30,000 people, whose annual payroll totals at least $20,000,000.
The growth of the telephone systems of the United States also furnishes us with statistics of an analogous nature, for we find that the average number of employees engaged in this industry is at least 140,000, whose annual earnings aggregate a minimum of $75,000,000; besides which the manufacturers of telephone apparatus employ over 12,000 persons, to whom is paid annually about $5,500,000.
The growth of the telephone systems in the United States also provides us with similar statistics, as we see that the average number of employees in this industry is at least 140,000, with annual earnings totaling at least $75,000,000. Additionally, manufacturers of telephone equipment employ over 12,000 people, who collectively earn around $5,500,000 each year.
No attempt is made to include figures of collateral industries, such, for instance, as copper, which is very closely allied with the electrical arts, and the great bulk of which is refined electrically.
No attempt is made to include figures from related industries, such as copper, which is very closely connected to electrical fields, and most of which is refined using electricity.
The 8000 or so motion-picture theatres of the country employ no fewer than 40,000 people, whose aggregate annual income amounts to not less than $37,000,000.
The approximately 8,000 movie theaters in the country employ at least 40,000 people, and their total annual income is at least $37,000,000.
Coming now to the Orange Valley plant, we take a drop from these figures to the comparatively modest ones which give us an average of 3600 employees and calling for an annual pay-roll of about $2,250,000. It must be remembered, however, that the sums mentioned above represent industries operated by great aggregations of capital, while the Orange Valley plant, as well as the Edison Portland Cement Company, with an average daily number of 530 employees and over $400,000 annual pay-roll, represent in a large measure industries that are more in the nature of closely held enterprises and practically under the direction of one mind.
Now, let's talk about the Orange Valley plant. The numbers here are significantly lower, with an average of 3,600 employees and an annual payroll of about $2,250,000. It's important to remember that the figures mentioned earlier reflect industries driven by large amounts of capital, whereas the Orange Valley plant, along with the Edison Portland Cement Company, which has about 530 employees and an annual payroll of over $400,000, mainly represents industries that are more like closely held businesses and are largely run by a single person or vision.
The table herewith given summarizes the figures that have just been presented, and affords an idea of the totals affected by the genius of this one man. It is well known that many other men and many other inventions have been needed for the perfection of these arts; but it is equally true that, as already noted, some of these industries are directly the creation of Edison, while in every one of the rest his impress has been deep and significant. Before he began inventing, only two of them were known at all as arts—telegraphy and the manufacture of cement. Moreover, these figures deal only with the United States, and take no account of the development of many of the Edison inventions in Europe or of their adoption throughout the world at large. Let it suffice
The table provided here summarizes the numbers just presented and gives an idea of the totals influenced by the genius of this one man. It's well known that many other individuals and inventions have been essential for perfecting these arts; however, it's also true, as previously mentioned, that some of these industries are directly the result of Edison’s work, while in all the others, his impact has been profound and significant. Before he started inventing, only two were recognized as arts—telegraphy and cement manufacturing. Furthermore, these figures only reflect the United States and do not account for the development of many of Edison’s inventions in Europe or their adoption worldwide. Let it suffice
STATISTICAL RESUME (APPROXIMATE) OF SOME OF THE INDUSTRIES IN THE UNITED STATES DIRECTLY FOUNDED UPON OR AFFECTED BY INVENTIONS OF THOMAS A. EDISON
STATISTICAL RESUME (APPROXIMATE) OF SOME OF THE INDUSTRIES IN THE UNITED STATES DIRECTLY FOUNDED UPON OR AFFECTED BY INVENTIONS OF THOMAS A. EDISON
Annual Gross Rev- Number Annual Class of Industry Investment enue or of Em- Pay-Rolls sales Central station lighting and power $1,000,000,000 $125,000,000 50,000 $40,000,000 Isolated incandescent lighting 500,000,000 — 33,000 17,000 000 Incandescent lamps 25,000,000 20,000,000 14,000 8,000 000 Electric fixtures 8,000,000 5,000,000 6,000 3,750,000 Dynamos and motors 60,000,000 50,000,000 30,000 20,000,000 Electric railways 4,000,000,000 430,000,000 250,000 155,000,000 Telephone systems 800,000,000 175,000,000 140,000 75,000,000 Telephone apparatus 30,000,000 15,000,000 12,000 5,500,000 Phonograph and motion pictures 10,000,000 15,000,000 5,000 6,000,000 Motion picture theatres 40,000,000 80,000,000 40,000 37,000,000 Edison Portland cement 4,000,000 2,000,000 530 400,000 Telegraphy 250,000,000 60,000,000 100,000 30,000,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------Totals 6,727,000,000 1,077,000,000 680,530 397,650,000
Annual Gross Rev- Number Annual Class of Industry Investment enue or of Em- Pay-Rolls sales Central station lighting and power $1,000,000,000 $125,000,000 50,000 $40,000,000 Isolated incandescent lighting 500,000,000 — 33,000 17,000,000 Incandescent lamps 25,000,000 20,000,000 14,000 8,000,000 Electric fixtures 8,000,000 5,000,000 6,000 3,750,000 Dynamos and motors 60,000,000 50,000,000 30,000 20,000,000 Electric railways 4,000,000,000 430,000,000 250,000 155,000,000 Telephone systems 800,000,000 175,000,000 140,000 75,000,000 Telephone apparatus 30,000,000 15,000,000 12,000 5,500,000 Phonograph and motion pictures 10,000,000 15,000,000 5,000 6,000,000 Motion picture theatres 40,000,000 80,000,000 40,000 37,000,000 Edison Portland cement 4,000,000 2,000,000 530 400,000 Telegraphy 250,000,000 60,000,000 100,000 30,000,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------Totals 6,727,000,000 1,077,000,000 680,530 397,650,000
that in America alone the work of Edison has been one of the most potent factors in bringing into existence new industries now capitalized at nearly $ 7,000,000,000, earning annually over $1,000,000,000, and giving employment to an army of more than six hundred thousand people.
that in America alone, Edison's work has been one of the most powerful influences in creating new industries now valued at nearly $7 billion, generating over $1 billion in annual revenue, and providing jobs for more than six hundred thousand people.
A single diamond, prismatically flashing from its many facets the beauties of reflected light, comes well within the limits of comprehension of the human mind and appeals to appreciation by the finer sensibilities; but in viewing an exhibition of thousands of these beautiful gems, the eye and brain are simply bewildered with the richness of a display which tends to confuse the intellect until the function of analysis comes into play and leads to more adequate apprehension.
A single diamond, sparkling with light reflecting off its many facets, is easy for the human mind to understand and resonates with our deeper sensitivities. However, when faced with a display of thousands of these stunning gems, the eye and mind can feel overwhelmed by the wealth of beauty, which can confuse our thinking until we start to analyze it and gain a clearer understanding.
So, in presenting the mass of statistics contained in this chapter, we fear that the result may have been the bewilderment of the reader to some extent. Nevertheless, in writing a biography of Edison, the main object is to present the facts as they are, and leave it to the intelligent reader to classify, apply, and analyze them in such manner as appeals most forcibly to his intellectual processes. If in the foregoing pages there has appeared to be a tendency to attribute to Edison the entire credit for the growth to which many of the above-named great enterprises have in these latter days attained, we must especially disclaim any intention of giving rise to such a deduction. No one who has carefully followed the course of this narrative can deny, however, that Edison is the father of some of the arts and industries that have been mentioned, and that as to some of the others it was the magic of his touch that helped make them practicable. Not only to his work and ingenuity is due the present magnitude of these arts and industries, but it is attributable also to the splendid work and numerous contributions of other great inventors, such as Brush, Bell, Elihu Thomson, Weston, Sprague, and many others, as well as to the financiers and investors who in the past thirty years have furnished the vast sums of money that were necessary to exploit and push forward these enterprises.
So, in presenting the large amount of statistics in this chapter, we worry that the result may have somewhat confused the reader. However, when writing a biography of Edison, the main goal is to present the facts as they are and let the thoughtful reader sort, apply, and analyze them in a way that resonates most strongly with their thinking. If it seems that we've suggested Edison's sole credit for the growth of many of the great enterprises mentioned, we want to clarify that this was not our intention. Anyone who has closely followed this narrative cannot deny that Edison is the originator of some of the arts and industries we've discussed, and that his unique contributions played a significant role in making others feasible. The current scale of these arts and industries is not only due to his work and creativity but also to the outstanding efforts and many contributions from other major inventors like Brush, Bell, Elihu Thomson, Weston, Sprague, and others, as well as the investors and financiers who over the past thirty years have provided the substantial funds necessary to develop and advance these enterprises.
The reader may have noticed in a perusal of this chapter the lack of autobiographical quotations, such as have appeared in other parts of this narrative. Edison's modesty has allowed us but one remark on the subject. This was made by him to one of the writers a short time ago, when, after an interesting indulgence in reminiscences of old times and early inventions, he leaned back in his chair, and with a broad smile on his face, said, reflectively: "Say, I HAVE been mixed up in a whole lot of things, haven't I?"
The reader may have noticed in reading this chapter that there are no autobiographical quotes, unlike in other parts of this narrative. Edison's modesty has given us just one comment on the topic. He shared it with one of the writers recently when, after reminiscing about the past and his early inventions, he leaned back in his chair and, with a big smile on his face, said thoughtfully, "You know, I HAVE been involved in so many things, haven't I?"
CHAPTER XXVIII
THE BLACK FLAG
THROUGHOUT the forty-odd years of his creative life, Edison has realized by costly experience the truth of the cynical proverb that "A patent is merely a title to a lawsuit." It is not intended, however, by this statement to lead to any inference on the part of the reader that HE stands peculiarly alone in any such experience, for it has been and still is the common lot of every successful inventor, sooner or later.
THROUGHOUT the forty-some years of his creative life, Edison has learned through expensive experience the truth of the cynical saying that "A patent is just an invitation to a lawsuit." This statement isn't meant to suggest that he is uniquely solitary in such experiences; rather, it's been and continues to be the shared fate of every successful inventor, eventually.
To attribute dishonesty or cupidity as the root of the defence in all patent litigation would be aiming very wide of the mark, for in no class of suits that come before the courts are there any that present a greater variety of complex, finely shaded questions, or that require more delicacy of interpretation, than those that involve the construction of patents, particularly those relating to electrical devices. Indeed, a careful study of legal procedure of this character could not be carried far without discovery of the fact that in numerous instances the differences of opinion between litigants were marked by the utmost bona fides.
To say that dishonesty or greed is the main reason behind all patent lawsuits would be really missing the point. In no other type of case that goes before the courts is there such a wide range of complex and nuanced questions, or a greater need for careful interpretation, as in those dealing with patents, especially those linked to electrical devices. In fact, if you study the legal process in these cases, you'll soon realize that in many instances, the differing opinions between the parties involved are characterized by genuine good faith.
On the other hand, such study would reveal many cases of undoubted fraudulent intent, as well as many bold attempts to deprive the inventor of the fruits of his endeavors by those who have sought to evade, through subtle technicalities of the law, the penalty justly due them for trickery, evasion, or open contempt of the rights of others.
On the other hand, such a study would uncover many clear instances of fraudulent intent, as well as numerous brazen attempts to rob the inventor of the rewards of their hard work by those trying to sidestep, through clever legal loopholes, the punishment they rightfully deserve for deceit, evasion, or blatant disregard for the rights of others.
In the history of science and of the arts to which the world has owed its continued progress from year to year there is disclosed one remarkable fact, and that is, that whenever any important discovery or invention has been made and announced by one man, it has almost always been disclosed later that other men—possibly widely separated and knowing nothing of the other's work—have been following up the same general lines of investigation, independently, with the same object in mind. Their respective methods might be dissimilar while tending to the same end, but it does not necessarily follow that any one of these other experimenters might ever have achieved the result aimed at, although, after the proclamation of success by one, it is easy to believe that each of the other independent investigators might readily persuade himself that he would ultimately have reached the goal in just that same way.
Throughout the history of science and the arts, which have fueled the world's ongoing progress year after year, there's one striking fact: whenever a significant discovery or invention is made and announced by one individual, it often turns out that other people—who might be far apart and unaware of each other’s work—have been exploring the same general areas of research, independently, with the same goals in mind. Their methods may differ, yet they aim for the same outcome. However, this doesn’t mean that any of these other researchers would have necessarily achieved the same result, even if, after one person announces success, it's easy for each of the other independent thinkers to convince themselves that they would have eventually reached the same conclusion in the same way.
This peculiar coincidence of simultaneous but separate work not only comes to light on the bringing out of great and important discoveries or inventions, but becomes more apparent if a new art is disclosed, for then the imagination of previous experimenters is stimulated through wide dissemination of the tidings, sometimes resulting in more or less effort to enter the newly opened field with devices or methods that resemble closely the original and fundamental ones in principle and application. In this and other ways there arises constantly in the United States Patent Office a large number of contested cases, called "Interferences," where applications for patents covering the invention of a similar device have been independently filed by two or even more persons. In such cases only one patent can be issued, and that to the inventor who on the taking of testimony shows priority in date of invention. [20]
This strange coincidence of simultaneous but separate work not only becomes apparent with significant discoveries or inventions but is even more noticeable when a new art is revealed. This often sparks the imagination of earlier experimenters, leading to widespread sharing of the news, which sometimes results in various efforts to enter the newly opened field with devices or methods that closely resemble the original principles and applications. As a result, the United States Patent Office frequently faces a large number of contested cases, known as "Interferences," where multiple applications for patents covering similar inventions are filed independently by two or more individuals. In these situations, only one patent can be granted, awarded to the inventor who demonstrates priority in the date of invention through testimony. [20]
[Footnote 20: A most remarkable instance of contemporaneous invention and without a parallel in the annals of the United States Patent Office, occurred when, on the same day, February 15, 1876, two separate descriptions were filed in that office, one a complete application and the other a caveat, but each covering an invention for "transmitting vocal sounds telegraphically." The application was made by Alexander Graham Bell, of Salem, Massachusetts, and the caveat by Elisha Gray, of Chicago, Illinois. On examination of the two papers it was found that both of them covered practically the same ground, hence, as only one patent could be granted, it became necessary to ascertain the precise hour at which the documents were respectively filed, and put the parties in interference. This was done, with the result that the patent was ultimately awarded to Bell.]
[Footnote 20: A truly remarkable case of simultaneous invention, unmatched in the history of the United States Patent Office, occurred on the same day, February 15, 1876. On that day, two separate submissions were made to the office: one a complete application and the other a caveat, both concerning an invention for "transmitting vocal sounds telegraphically." The application was submitted by Alexander Graham Bell from Salem, Massachusetts, and the caveat was filed by Elisha Gray from Chicago, Illinois. Upon reviewing the two documents, it became clear that they covered essentially the same concept. Since only one patent could be granted, it was necessary to determine the exact time each document was filed and to instigate an interference. This was done, leading to the patent eventually being awarded to Bell.]
In the opening up and development of any new art based upon a fundamental discovery or invention, there ensues naturally an era of supplemental or collateral inventive activity—the legitimate outcome of the basic original ideas. Part of this development may be due to the inventive skill and knowledge of the original inventor and his associates, who, by reason of prior investigation, would be in better position to follow up the art in its earliest details than others, who might be regarded as mere outsiders. Thus a new enterprise may be presented before the world by its promoters in the belief that they are strongly fortified by patent rights which will protect them in a degree commensurate with the risks they have assumed.
In the launch and growth of any new art based on a major discovery or invention, there naturally follows a phase of additional or related creative activity—the valid result of the foundational original ideas. Some of this growth may stem from the inventive talent and knowledge of the original inventor and their team, who, due to previous research, would be better equipped to explore the art in its early aspects than others who might be seen as outsiders. As a result, a new venture may be introduced to the public by its promoters, convinced that they have strong patent rights that will offer them protection proportional to the risks they’ve taken.
Supplemental inventions, however, in any art, new or old, are not limited to those which emanate from the original workers, for the ingenuity of man, influenced by the spirit of the times, seizes upon any novel line of action and seeks to improve or enlarge upon it, or, at any rate, to produce more or less variation of its phases. Consequently, there is a constant endeavor on the part of a countless host of men possessing some degree of technical skill and inventive ability, to win fame and money by entering into the already opened fields of endeavor with devices and methods of their own, for which subsidiary patents may be obtainable. Some of such patents may prove to be valuable, while it is quite certain that in the natural order of things others will be commercially worthless, but none may be entirely disregarded in the history and development of the art.
Supplemental inventions, whether in new or old fields, aren't just created by the original innovators. Instead, human creativity, shaped by the current trends, embraces any innovative approach and aims to enhance or expand upon it, or at least to create some variations of its aspects. As a result, there’s a continuous effort from countless individuals with varying levels of technical skill and inventive talent to gain recognition and profit by exploring these already established areas with their own devices and methods, for which they can secure additional patents. Some of these patents may turn out to be valuable, while it’s clear that many will be commercially worthless, yet none should be completely overlooked in the context of the art's history and development.
It will be quite obvious, therefore, that the advent of any useful invention or discovery, great or small, is followed by a clashing of many interests which become complex in their interpretation by reason of the many conflicting claims that cluster around the main principle. Nor is the confusion less confounded through efforts made on the part of dishonest persons, who, like vultures, follow closely on the trail of successful inventors and (sometimes through information derived by underhand methods) obtain patents on alleged inventions, closely approximating the real ones, solely for the purpose of harassing the original patentee until they are bought up, or else, with the intent of competing boldly in the new business, trust in the delays of legal proceedings to obtain a sure foothold in their questionable enterprise.
It’s pretty clear, then, that when any useful invention or discovery comes along, big or small, it leads to a clash of many interests that become complicated due to the numerous conflicting claims surrounding the main idea. The confusion is often made worse by dishonest individuals who, like vultures, closely follow successful inventors and sometimes use shady methods to gain patents on inventions that closely resemble the original ones, just to harass the original patent holder until they’re forced to buy them out or, with the intention of competing openly in the new market, rely on legal delays to secure a foothold in their questionable business.
Then again there are still others who, having no patent rights, but waving aside all compunction and in downright fraud, simply enter the commercial field against the whole world, using ruthlessly whatever inventive skill and knowledge the original patentee may have disclosed, and trusting to the power of money, rapid movement, and mendacious advertising to build up a business which shall presently assume such formidable proportions as to force a compromise, or stave off an injunction until the patent has expired. In nine cases out of ten such a course can be followed with relative impunity; and guided by skilful experts who may suggest really trivial changes here and there over the patented structure, and with the aid of keen and able counsel, hardly a patent exists that could not be invaded by such infringers. Such is the condition of our laws and practice that the patentee in seeking to enforce his rights labors under a terrible handicap.
Then again, there are others who, lacking patent rights, casually set aside any remorse and, through outright deception, enter the market against everyone, using whatever inventive skills and knowledge the original patent holder has shared, and relying on money, quick actions, and misleading advertising to build a business that can grow large enough to force a settlement or delay a lawsuit until the patent expires. In nine out of ten cases, this approach can be taken with relative safety; and with the guidance of skilled experts who might suggest minor changes here and there to the patented design, along with sharp and capable legal advice, there's hardly a patent that couldn't be challenged by such infringers. The state of our laws and practices makes it so that the patent holder, in trying to enforce their rights, faces a daunting disadvantage.
And, finally, in this recital of perplexing conditions confronting the inventor, there must not be forgotten the commercial "shark," whose predatory instincts are ever keenly alert for tender victims. In the wake of every newly developed art of world-wide importance there is sure to follow a number of unscrupulous adventurers, who hasten to take advantage of general public ignorance of the true inwardness of affairs. Basing their operations on this lack of knowledge, and upon the tendency of human nature to give credence to widely advertised and high-sounding descriptions and specious promises of vast profits, these men find little difficulty in conjuring money out of the pockets of the unsophisticated and gullible, who rush to become stockholders in concerns that have "airy nothings" for a foundation, and that collapse quickly when the bubble is pricked. [21]
And finally, in this rundown of confusing challenges facing the inventor, we shouldn't forget the commercial "shark," whose predatory instincts are always on the lookout for easy targets. Following every newly developed art of global significance, there are sure to be a number of unscrupulous opportunists who rush to take advantage of the public's ignorance about the real situation. Leveraging this lack of knowledge and the tendency of people to believe in flashy advertisements and grand promises of huge profits, these men have no trouble extracting money from the unsophisticated and gullible, who eagerly rush to become shareholders in businesses that have "airy nothings" as their foundation and quickly collapse when the bubble bursts. [21]
[Footnote 21: A notable instance of the fleecing of unsuspecting and credulous persons occurred in the early eighties, during the furor occasioned by the introduction of Mr. Edison's electric-light system. A corporation claiming to have a self-generating dynamo (practically perpetual motion) advertised its preposterous claims extensively, and actually succeeded in selling a large amount of stock, which, of course, proved to be absolutely worthless.]
[Footnote 21: A significant case of scamming gullible people happened in the early eighties during the excitement surrounding Mr. Edison's electric-light system. A company claiming to have a self-generating dynamo (essentially perpetual motion) heavily promoted its absurd claims and actually managed to sell a lot of stock, which, of course, turned out to be completely worthless.]
To one who is unacquainted with the trying circumstances attending the introduction and marketing of patented devices, it might seem unnecessary that an inventor and his business associates should be obliged to take into account the unlawful or ostensible competition of pirates or schemers, who, in the absence of legal decision, may run a free course for a long time. Nevertheless, as public patronage is the element vitally requisite for commercial success, and as the public is not usually in full possession of all the facts and therefore cannot discriminate between the genuine and the false, the legitimate inventor must avail himself of every possible means of proclaiming and asserting his rights if he desires to derive any benefit from the results of his skill and labor. Not only must he be prepared to fight in the Patent Office and pursue a regular course of patent litigation against those who may honestly deem themselves to be protected by other inventions or patents of similar character, and also proceed against more palpable infringers who are openly, defiantly, and illegitimately engaged in competitive business operations, but he must, as well, endeavor to protect himself against the assaults of impudent fraud by educating the public mind to a point of intelligent apprehension of the true status of his invention and the conflicting claims involved.
To someone who is unfamiliar with the challenging situations surrounding the introduction and marketing of patented devices, it might seem unnecessary for an inventor and their business partners to consider the illegal or apparent competition from pirates or schemers, who can operate freely without legal decisions for a long time. However, since public support is crucial for commercial success, and the public typically doesn't have all the facts and therefore can't tell the difference between what's genuine and what's fake, the legitimate inventor must use every possible way to announce and assert their rights if they want to benefit from their skills and hard work. They not only need to be ready to fight in the Patent Office and engage in regular patent litigation against those who honestly believe they're protected by other inventions or patents of similar nature, but they must also take action against more obvious infringers who are openly and unlawfully competing in business. Additionally, they should work to protect themselves from the attacks of blatant fraud by educating the public to understand the true status of their invention and the competing claims involved.
When the nature of a patent right is considered it is difficult to see why this should be so. The inventor creates a new thing—an invention of utility—and the people, represented by the Federal Government, say to him in effect: "Disclose your invention to us in a patent so that we may know how to practice it, and we will agree to give you a monopoly for seventeen years, after which we shall be free to use it. If the right thus granted is invaded, apply to a Federal Court and the infringer will be enjoined and required to settle in damages." Fair and false promise! Is it generally realized that no matter how flagrant the infringement nor how barefaced and impudent the infringer, no Federal Court will grant an injunction UNTIL THE PATENT SHALL HAVE BEEN FIRST LITIGATED TO FINAL HEARING AND SUSTAINED? A procedure, it may be stated, requiring years of time and thousands of dollars, during which other infringers have generally entered the field, and all have grown fat.
When we think about what a patent right really is, it’s hard to understand why it works this way. The inventor creates something new—something useful—and the people, represented by the Federal Government, essentially say to him: "Share your invention with us in a patent so we can know how to use it, and we’ll give you a monopoly for seventeen years. After that, everyone else can use it freely. If someone infringes on your right, go to a Federal Court, and the infringer will be stopped and required to pay damages." Sounds fair, but is it really? It’s important to realize that no matter how blatant the infringement or how bold the infringer is, no Federal Court will grant an injunction UNTIL THE PATENT HAS BEEN LITIGATED TO FINAL HEARING AND UPHELD FIRST. This process can take years and cost thousands of dollars, during which time other infringers typically enter the market, and all of them benefit.
Thus Edison and his business associates have been forced into a veritable maelstrom of litigation during the major part of the last forty years, in the effort to procure for themselves a small measure of protection for their interests under the numerous inventions of note that he has made at various times in that period. The earlier years of his inventive activity, while productive of many important contributions to electrical industries, such as stock tickers and printers, duplex, quadruplex, and automatic telegraphs, were not marked by the turmoil of interminable legal conflicts that arose after the beginning of the telephone and electric-light epochs. In fact, his inventions; up to and including his telephone improvements (which entered into already existing arts), had been mostly purchased by the Western Union and other companies, and while there was more or less contesting of his claims (especially in respect of the telephone), the extent of such litigation was not so conspicuously great as that which centred subsequently around his patents covering incandescent electric lighting and power systems.
Thus, Edison and his business partners have found themselves caught in a whirlwind of lawsuits for most of the last forty years, trying to secure some protection for their interests amid the many significant inventions he created during that time. In the earlier years of his inventing, he made many important contributions to electrical industries, like stock tickers and printers, duplex, quadruplex, and automatic telegraphs, but those years weren't plagued by the endless legal battles that began with the rise of the telephone and electric-light eras. In fact, his inventions, including his improvements to the telephone (which were built on existing technologies), were mostly bought by Western Union and other companies. Although there was some dispute over his claims, especially regarding the telephone, the amount of litigation wasn't nearly as intense as what later surrounded his patents for incandescent electric lighting and power systems.
Through these inventions there came into being an entirely new art, complete in its practicability evolved by Edison after protracted experiments founded upon most patient, thorough, and original methods of investigation extending over several years. Long before attaining the goal, he had realized with characteristic insight the underlying principles of the great and comprehensive problem he had started out to solve, and plodded steadily along the path that he had marked out, ignoring the almost universal scientific disbelief in his ultimate success. "Dreamer," "fool," "boaster" were among the appellations bestowed upon him by unbelieving critics. Ridicule was heaped upon him in the public prints, and mathematics were called into service by learned men to settle the point forever that he was attempting the utterly impossible.
Through these inventions, a completely new art emerged, fully practical and developed by Edison after extensive experiments based on his patient, thorough, and original methods of investigation over several years. Long before he reached his goal, he recognized, with his typical insight, the fundamental principles of the broad and complex problem he had set out to solve, and he steadily followed the path he had planned, ignoring the widespread scientific skepticism about his eventual success. He was labeled a "dreamer," "fool," and "boaster" by doubting critics. He faced ridicule in the press, and academics used mathematics to prove that he was trying the utterly impossible.
But, presto! no sooner had he accomplished the task and shown concrete results to the world than he found himself in the anomalous position of being at once surrounded by the conditions which inevitably confront every inventor. The path through the trackless forest had been blazed, and now every one could find the way. At the end of the road was a rich prize belonging rightfully to the man who had opened a way to it, but the struggles of others to reach it by more or less honest methods now began and continued for many years. If, as a former commissioner once said, "Edison was the man who kept the path to the Patent Office hot with his footsteps," there were other great inventors abreast or immediately on his heels, some, to be sure, with legitimate, original methods and vital improvements representing independent work; while there were also those who did not trouble to invent, but simply helped themselves to whatever ideas were available, and coming from any source.
But, suddenly! No sooner had he completed the task and shown real results to the world than he found himself in the unusual position of facing all the challenges that every inventor inevitably encounters. The trail through the uncharted forest had been cleared, and now anyone could find their way. At the end of this path was a valuable reward rightfully belonging to the person who had paved the way to it, but the efforts of others to reach it through various methods, honest or otherwise, soon began and continued for many years. If, as a former commissioner once said, "Edison was the man who kept the path to the Patent Office busy with his footsteps," there were other great inventors right alongside him or closely trailing, some, of course, with legitimate, original methods and significant improvements resulting from independent work; while there were also those who didn’t bother to invent, but simply took whatever ideas were out there, coming from any source.
Possibly events might have happened differently had Edison been able to prevent the announcement of his electric-light inventions until he was entirely prepared to bring out the system as a whole, ready for commercial exploitation, but the news of his production of a practical and successful incandescent lamp became known and spread like wild-fire to all corners of the globe. It took more than a year after the evolution of the lamp for Edison to get into position to do actual business, and during that time his laboratory was the natural Mecca of every inquiring person. Small wonder, then, that when he was prepared to market his invention he should find others entering that market, at home and abroad, at the same time, and with substantially similar merchandise.
It's possible things could have turned out differently if Edison had managed to keep the announcement of his electric light inventions under wraps until he was fully ready to launch the complete system for commercial use. However, news of his successful incandescent lamp spread rapidly around the world. It took over a year after the lamp was developed for Edison to be ready for actual business, and during that time, his laboratory became a hub for anyone eager to learn more. So, it's no surprise that when he was ready to sell his invention, he found others entering the market both locally and internationally with very similar products at the same time.
Edison narrates two incidents that may be taken as characteristic of a good deal that had to be contended with, coming in the shape of nefarious attack. "In the early days of my electric light," he says, "curiosity and interest brought a great many people to Menlo Park to see it. Some of them did not come with the best of intentions. I remember the visit of one expert, a well-known electrician, a graduate of Johns Hopkins University, and who then represented a Baltimore gas company. We had the lamps exhibited in a large room, and so arranged on a table as to illustrate the regular layout of circuits for houses and streets. Sixty of the men employed at the laboratory were used as watchers, each to keep an eye on a certain section of the exhibit, and see there was no monkeying with it. This man had a length of insulated No. 10 wire passing through his sleeves and around his back, so that his hands would conceal the ends and no one would know he had it. His idea, of course, was to put this wire across the ends of the supplying circuits, and short-circuit the whole thing—put it all out of business without being detected. Then he could report how easily the electric light went out, and a false impression would be conveyed to the public. He did not know that we had already worked out the safety-fuse, and that every group of lights was thus protected independently. He put this jumper slyly in contact with the wires—and just four lamps went out on the section he tampered with. The watchers saw him do it, however, and got hold of him and just led him out of the place with language that made the recording angels jump for their typewriters."
Edison shares two incidents that highlight some of the challenges he faced, particularly from malicious attacks. "In the early days of my electric light," he says, "curiosity and interest drew many people to Menlo Park to check it out. Some didn’t come with the best intentions. I remember one visit from an expert, a well-known electrician and a graduate of Johns Hopkins University, who was representing a gas company from Baltimore. We had the lamps displayed in a large room, arranged on a table to demonstrate a typical setup of circuits for homes and streets. Sixty of the lab’s employees were assigned as monitors, each responsible for watching a specific section of the exhibit to ensure no one was tampering with it. This guy had a length of insulated No. 10 wire hidden in his sleeves and wrapped around his back, so his hands could cover the ends and nobody would notice it. His plan was to connect this wire across the supply circuits to short-circuit everything—shutting it all down without being caught. Then he could claim how easily the electric light went out, creating a false impression for the public. What he didn’t know was that we had already developed the safety fuse, so every group of lights was individually protected. He secretly connected the jumper to the wires—and only four lamps went out in the section he messed with. However, the monitors saw him do it, caught him, and escorted him out with words that would make even angels take note."
The other incident is as follows: "Soon after I had got out the incandescent light I had an interference in the Patent Office with a man from Wisconsin. He filed an application for a patent and entered into a conspiracy to 'swear back' of the date of my invention, so as to deprive me of it. Detectives were put on the case, and we found he was a 'faker,' and we took means to break the thing up. Eugene Lewis, of Eaton & Lewis, had this in hand for me. Several years later this same man attempted to defraud a leading firm of manufacturing chemists in New York, and was sent to State prison. A short time after that a syndicate took up a man named Goebel and tried to do the same thing, but again our detective-work was too much for them. This was along the same line as the attempt of Drawbaugh to deprive Bell of his telephone. Whenever an invention of large prospective value comes out, these cases always occur. The lamp patent was sustained in the New York Federal Court. I thought that was final and would end the matter, but another Federal judge out in St. Louis did not sustain it. The result is I have never enjoyed any benefits from my lamp patents, although I fought for many years." The Goebel case will be referred to later in this chapter.
The other incident is as follows: "Soon after I had developed the electric light, I had an issue at the Patent Office with a guy from Wisconsin. He submitted a patent application and conspired to 'swear back' the date of my invention to take it away from me. We hired detectives to investigate, and we discovered he was a fraud, so we took steps to stop him. Eugene Lewis, from Eaton & Lewis, handled this for me. A few years later, this same guy tried to scam a major manufacturing chemistry firm in New York and ended up in State prison. Not long after that, a group backed a man named Goebel who tried to pull the same stunt, but our detective work was too strong for them. This was similar to Drawbaugh's attempt to rob Bell of his telephone. Whenever a promising invention comes out, these situations always pop up. The lamp patent was upheld in the New York Federal Court. I thought that would be the end of it, but another Federal judge in St. Louis did not uphold it. As a result, I've never benefited from my lamp patents, even though I fought for many years." The Goebel case will be referred to later in this chapter.
The original owner of the patents and inventions covering his electric-lighting system, the Edison Electric Light Company (in which Edison was largely interested as a stockholder), thus found at the outset that its commercial position was imperilled by the activity of competitors who had sprung up like mushrooms. It became necessary to take proper preliminary legal steps to protect the interests which had been acquired at the cost of so much money and such incessant toil and experiment. During the first few years in which the business of the introduction of the light was carried on with such strenuous and concentrated effort, the attention of Edison and his original associates was constantly focused upon the commercial exploitation and the further development of the system at home and abroad. The difficult and perplexing situation at that time is thus described by Major S. B. Eaton:
The original owner of the patents and inventions for his electric lighting system, the Edison Electric Light Company (where Edison was mostly invested as a stockholder), quickly realized that its commercial position was at risk due to competitors who popped up like mushrooms. It became essential to take the necessary legal steps to protect the interests that had been gained at such a high cost of money and relentless hard work and experimentation. During the first few years of aggressively promoting the light, Edison and his original partners were constantly focused on commercially developing and further advancing the system both at home and internationally. Major S. B. Eaton describes the challenging and confusing situation at that time as follows:
"The reason for the delay in beginning and pushing suits for infringements of the lamp patent has never been generally understood. In my official position as president of the Edison Electric Light Company I became the target, along with Mr. Edison, for censure from the stockholders and others on account of this delay, and I well remember how deep the feeling was. In view of the facts that a final injunction on the lamp patent was not obtained until the life of the patent was near its end, and, next, that no damages in money were ever paid by the guilty infringers, it has been generally believed that Mr. Edison sacrificed the interest of his stockholders selfishly when he delayed the prosecution of patent suits and gave all his time and energies to manufacturing. This belief was the stronger because the manufacturing enterprises belonged personally to Mr. Edison and not to his company. But the facts render it easy to dispel this false belief. The Edison inventions were not only a lamp; they comprised also an entire system of central stations. Such a thing was new to the world, and the apparatus, as well as the manufacture thereof, was equally new. Boilers, engines, dynamos, motors, distribution mains, meters, house-wiring, safety-devices, lamps, and lamp-fixtures—all were vital parts of the whole system. Most of them were utterly novel and unknown to the arts, and all of them required quick, and, I may say, revolutionary thought and invention. The firm of Babcock & Wilcox gave aid on the boilers, Armington & Sims undertook the engines, but everything else was abnormal. No factories in the land would take up the manufacture. I remember, for instance, our interviews with Messrs. Mitchell, Vance & Co., the leading manufacturers of house gas-lighting fixtures, such as brackets and chandeliers. They had no faith in electric lighting, and rejected all our overtures to induce them to take up the new business of making electric-light fixtures. As regards other parts of the Edison system, notably the Edison dynamo, no such machines had ever existed; there was no factory in the world equipped to make them, and, most discouraging of all, the very scientific principles of their construction were still vague and experimental.
The reason for the delay in starting and pursuing lawsuits for violations of the lamp patent has never been fully understood. As the president of the Edison Electric Light Company, I, along with Mr. Edison, faced criticism from stockholders and others because of this delay, and I remember how strong that feeling was. Given that a final injunction on the lamp patent wasn't secured until the patent was close to expiration, and that the guilty infringers never paid any damages, many believed that Mr. Edison selfishly put his stockholders' interests at risk by delaying patent lawsuits and focusing all his time and energy on manufacturing. This belief was even stronger because the manufacturing ventures personally belonged to Mr. Edison, not to the company. However, the facts make it easy to dispel this misconception. The Edison inventions were not just a lamp; they included an entire system of central stations. This was something completely new, and the machinery, along with its production, was equally groundbreaking. Boilers, engines, dynamos, motors, distribution mains, meters, house wiring, safety devices, lamps, and lamp fixtures were all crucial parts of the system. Most of these were entirely novel and unfamiliar, requiring rapid and, I would say, revolutionary thinking and innovation. Babcock & Wilcox assisted with the boilers, while Armington & Sims handled the engines, but everything else was unprecedented. No factories across the country were willing to take on the production. I remember, for example, our meetings with Messrs. Mitchell, Vance & Co., the leading manufacturers of gas lighting fixtures like brackets and chandeliers. They had no confidence in electric lighting and dismissed all our attempts to get them to venture into making electric light fixtures. Regarding other components of the Edison system, particularly the Edison dynamo, no machines like that had ever been made; there was no factory worldwide that could produce them, and, most frustrating of all, the scientific principles behind their construction were still unclear and experimental.
"What was to be done? Mr. Edison has never been greater than when he met and solved this crisis. 'If there are no factories,' he said, 'to make my inventions, I will build the factories myself. Since capital is timid, I will raise and supply it. The issue is factories or death.' Mr. Edison invited the cooperation of his leading stockholders. They lacked confidence or did not care to increase their investments. He was forced to go on alone. The chain of Edison shops was then created. By far the most perplexing of these new manufacturing problems was the lamp. Not only was it a new industry, one without shadow of prototype, but the mechanical devices for making the lamps, and to some extent the very machines to make those devices, were to be invented. All of this was done by the courage, capital, and invincible energy and genius of the great inventor. But Mr. Edison could not create these great and diverse industries and at the same time give requisite attention to litigation. He could not start and develop the new and hard business of electric lighting and yet spare one hour to pursue infringers. One thing or the other must wait. All agreed that it must be the litigation. And right there a lasting blow was given to the prestige of the Edison patents. The delay was translated as meaning lack of confidence; and the alert infringer grew strong in courage and capital. Moreover, and what was the heaviest blow of all, he had time, thus unmolested, to get a good start.
What was the plan? Mr. Edison was at his best when he faced and tackled this challenge. "If there are no factories," he said, "to produce my inventions, I’ll build the factories myself. Since investors are hesitant, I will raise and provide the funds. The choice is factories or nothing." Mr. Edison reached out for support from his major stockholders. They were either uncertain or unwilling to invest more. He had to move forward on his own. The network of Edison shops was then established. The most complicated of these new manufacturing challenges was the lamp. Not only was it a brand-new industry with no templates to follow, but the mechanical equipment needed to create the lamps, and even some of the machines to produce that equipment, had to be invented as well. All of this was achieved through the courage, funding, and unstoppable energy and intelligence of the great inventor. But Mr. Edison couldn’t build these vast and varied industries while also focusing on legal battles. He couldn’t start and grow the challenging electric lighting business and still set aside time to chase down patent violators. One had to be put on hold. It was universally agreed that litigation would be the one to wait. This decision dealt a lasting blow to the credibility of Edison’s patents. The delay was interpreted as a sign of weakness, and those who infringed quickly gained confidence and resources. Moreover, perhaps the most damaging outcome was that they had the time, unchallenged, to gain a solid foothold.
"In looking back on those days and scrutinizing them through the years, I am impressed by the greatness, the solitary greatness I may say, of Mr. Edison. We all felt then that we were of importance, and that our contribution of effort and zeal were vital. I can see now, however, that the best of us was nothing but the fly on the wheel. Suppose anything had happened to Edison? All would have been chaos and ruin.. To him, therefore, be the glory, if not the profit."
"When I look back on those days and reflect on them over the years, I’m struck by the greatness—truly the unique greatness—of Mr. Edison. We all felt significant at the time, believing our hard work and enthusiasm were essential. Now, however, I realize that the best among us were just a small part of the machine. If anything had happened to Edison, everything would have fallen apart. So, all the glory, if not the gains, belong to him."
The foregoing remarks of Major Eaton show authoritatively how the much-discussed delay in litigating the Edison patents was so greatly misunderstood at the time, and also how imperatively necessary it was for Edison and his associates to devote their entire time and energies to the commercial development of the art. As the lighting business increased, however, and a great number of additional men were initiated into its mysteries, Edison and his experts were able to spare some time to legal matters, and an era of active patent litigation against infringers was opened about the year 1885 by the Edison company, and thereafter continued for many years.
Major Eaton’s earlier comments clearly demonstrate how the much-debated delay in dealing with the Edison patents was widely misunderstood at the time, and also how crucial it was for Edison and his team to focus all their time and energy on developing the technology commercially. However, as the lighting business grew and many more people were brought into its complexities, Edison and his experts found some time to handle legal issues, leading to a period of intense patent litigation against infringers that began around 1885 and continued for many years.
While the history of this vast array of legal proceedings possesses a fascinating interest for those involved, as well as for professional men, legal and scientific, it could not be expected that it would excite any such feeling on the part of a casual reader. Hence, it is not proposed to encumber this narrative with any detailed record of the numerous suits that were brought and conducted through their complicated ramifications by eminent counsel. Suffice it to say that within about sixteen years after the commencement of active patent litigation, there had been spent by the owners of the Edison lighting patents upward of two million dollars in prosecuting more than two hundred lawsuits brought against persons who were infringing many of the patents of Edison on the incandescent electric lamp and component parts of his system. Over fifty separate patents were involved in these suits, including the basic one on the lamp (ordinarily called the "Filament" patent), other detail lamp patents, as well as those on sockets, switches, dynamos, motors, and distributing systems.
While the history of this extensive series of legal proceedings is fascinating for those involved and for legal and scientific professionals, it wouldn't be expected to spark much interest from a casual reader. Therefore, this narrative will not be weighed down with a detailed account of the many lawsuits that were brought and managed through their complex developments by prominent lawyers. It’s enough to say that within about sixteen years after active patent litigation began, the owners of the Edison lighting patents spent over two million dollars pursuing more than two hundred lawsuits against individuals infringing on many of Edison's patents for the incandescent electric lamp and its component parts. More than fifty separate patents were involved in these lawsuits, including the primary one for the lamp (commonly known as the "Filament" patent), additional detail lamp patents, as well as patents for sockets, switches, dynamos, motors, and distributing systems.
The principal, or "test," suit on the "Filament" patent was that brought against "The United States Electric Lighting Company," which became a cause celebre in the annals of American jurisprudence. Edison's claims were strenuously and stubbornly contested throughout a series of intense legal conflicts that raged in the courts for a great many years. Both sides of the controversy were represented by legal talent of the highest order, under whose examination and cross-examination volumes of testimony were taken, until the printed record (including exhibits) amounted to more than six thousand pages. Scientific and technical literature and records in all parts of the civilized world were subjected to the most minute scrutiny of opposing experts in the endeavor to prove Edison to be merely an adapter of methods and devices already projected or suggested by others. The world was ransacked for anything that might be claimed as an anticipation of what he had done. Every conceivable phase of ingenuity that could be devised by technical experts was exercised in the attempt to show that Edison had accomplished nothing new. Everything that legal acumen could suggest—every subtle technicality of the law—all the complicated variations of phraseology that the novel nomenclature of a young art would allow—all were pressed into service and availed of by the contestors of the Edison invention in their desperate effort to defeat his claims. It was all in vain, however, for the decision of the court was in favor of Edison, and his lamp patent was sustained not only by the tribunal of the first resort, but also by the Appellate Court some time afterward.
The main lawsuit over the "Filament" patent was filed against "The United States Electric Lighting Company," which became a significant case in American legal history. Edison's claims were vigorously and stubbornly challenged throughout a long series of legal battles that spanned many years. Both sides had top-notch legal representation, and they gathered a massive amount of testimony through extensive examination and cross-examination, resulting in a printed record (including exhibits) that exceeded six thousand pages. Scientific and technical documents from around the world were carefully reviewed by expert witnesses trying to prove that Edison was simply adapting methods and devices that had already been proposed or suggested by others. The search was extensive for anything that could be considered prior art to what he had created. Every possible angle that technical experts could think of was explored to argue that Edison had achieved nothing innovative. Every strategy that legal minds could devise—every intricate legal detail—along with all the complex variations of wording that the new terminology of a budding field would allow—were used by those opposing Edison's invention in their urgent attempt to undermine his claims. However, it was all for nothing, as the court ruled in Edison's favor, and his lamp patent was upheld not only by the trial court but also by the Appellate Court later on.
The first trial was had before Judge Wallace in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, and the appeal was heard by Judges Lacombe and Shipman, of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals. Before both tribunals the cause had been fully represented by counsel chosen from among the most eminent representatives of the bar at that time, those representing the Edison interests being the late Clarence A. Seward and Grosvenor P. Lowrey, together with Sherburne Blake Eaton, Albert H. Walker, and Richard N. Dyer. The presentation of the case to the courts had in both instances been marked by masterly and able arguments, elucidated by experiments and demonstrations to educate the judges on technical points. Some appreciation of the magnitude of this case may be gained from the fact that the argument on its first trial employed a great many days, and the minutes covered hundreds of pages of closely typewritten matter, while the argument on appeal required eight days, and was set forth in eight hundred and fifty pages of typewriting. Eliminating all purely forensic eloquence and exparte statements, the addresses of counsel in this celebrated suit are worthy of deep study by an earnest student, for, taken together, they comprise the most concise, authentic, and complete history of the prior state of the art and the development of the incandescent lamp that had been made up to that time. [22]
The first trial took place before Judge Wallace in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, and the appeal was heard by Judges Lacombe and Shipman of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals. In both instances, the case was thoroughly represented by lawyers chosen from some of the most respected figures in the field at that time. Those representing the Edison interests included the late Clarence A. Seward and Grosvenor P. Lowrey, along with Sherburne Blake Eaton, Albert H. Walker, and Richard N. Dyer. The way the case was presented to the courts was characterized by skilled and compelling arguments, supported by experiments and demonstrations that aimed to educate the judges on technical aspects. The significance of this case can be understood from the fact that the arguments during the first trial spanned several days, with minutes totaling hundreds of pages of closely typed material, while the appeal argument took eight days and was documented in eight hundred and fifty pages of typewriting. Disregarding all purely rhetorical flourishes and one-sided statements, the speeches of the lawyers in this famous lawsuit are worthy of careful examination by serious students, as they collectively offer the most concise, accurate, and comprehensive account of the prior state of the art and the development of the incandescent lamp up to that point. [22]
[Footnote 22: The argument on appeal was conducted with the dignity and decorum that characterize such a proceeding in that court. There is usually little that savors of humor in the ordinary conduct of a case of this kind, but in the present instance a pertinent story was related by Mr. Lowrey, and it is now reproduced. In the course of his address to the court, Mr. Lowrey said: "I have to mention the name of one expert whose testimony will, I believe, be found as accurate, as sincere, as straightforward as if it were the preaching of the gospel. I do it with great pleasure, and I ask you to read the testimony of Charles L. Clarke along with that of Thomas A. Edison. He had rather a hard row to hoe. He is a young gentleman; he is a very well-instructed man in his profession; he is not what I have called in the argument below an expert in the art of testifying, like some of the others, he has not yet become expert; what he may descend to later cannot be known; he entered upon his first experience, I think, with my brother Duncan, who is no trifler when he comes to deal with these questions, and for several months Mr. Clarke was pursued up and down, over a range of suggestions of what he would have thought if he had thought something else had been said at some time when something else was not said." Mr. Duncan—"I got three pages a day out of him, too." Mr. Lowrey—"Well, it was a good result. It always recalled to me what I venture now, since my friend breaks in upon me in this rude manner, to tell the court as well illustrative of what happened there. It is the story of the pickerel and the roach. My friend, Professor Von Reisenberg, of the University of Ghent, pursued a series of investigations into the capacity of various animals to receive ideas. Among the rest he put a pickerel into a tank containing water, and separated across its middle by a transparent glass plate, and on the other side he put a red roach. Now your Honors both know how a pickerel loves a red roach, and I have no doubt you will remember that he is a fish of a very low forehead and an unlimited appetite. When this pickerel saw the red roach through the glass, he made one of those awful dashes which is usually the ruin of whatever stands in its way; but he didn't reach the red roach. He received an impression, doubtless. It was not sufficient, however, to discourage him, and he immediately tried again, and he continued to try for three-quarters of an hour. At the end of three-quarters of an hour he seemed a little shaken and discouraged, and stopped, and the red roach was taken out for that day and the pickerel left. On the succeeding day the red roach was restored, and the pickerel had forgotten the impressions of the first day, and he repeated this again. At the end of the second day the roach was taken out. This was continued, not through so long a period as the effort to take my friend Clarke and devour him, but for a period of about three weeks. At the end of the three weeks, the time during which the pickerel persisted each day had been shortened and shortened, until it was at last discovered that he didn't try at all. The plate glass was then removed, and the pickerel and the red roach sailed around together in perfect peace ever afterward. The pickerel doubtless attributed to the roach all this shaking, the rebuff which he had received. And that is about the condition in which my brother Duncan and my friend Clarke were at the end of this examination." Mr. Duncan—"I notice on the redirect that Mr. Clarke changed his color." Mr. Lowrey—"Well, perhaps he was a different kind of a roach then; but you didn't succeed in taking him. "I beg your Honors to read the testimony of Mr. Clarke in the light of the anecdote of the pickerel and the roach."
[Footnote 22: The argument on appeal was conducted with the dignity and decorum that are typical of such proceedings in that court. There's usually little humor in the ordinary conduct of a case like this, but in this instance, a relevant story was shared by Mr. Lowrey, and it’s now included here. During his address to the court, Mr. Lowrey said: "I need to mention the name of one expert whose testimony I believe will be as accurate, sincere, and straightforward as if it were the preaching of the gospel. I do this with great pleasure, and I ask you to read the testimony of Charles L. Clarke alongside that of Thomas A. Edison. He had quite a tough time. He is a young man, well-educated in his field; he is not what I referred to in my earlier argument as an expert in the art of testifying—unlike some of the others, he hasn’t become experienced yet. What he may become later is uncertain; he started his first experience, I think, with my brother Duncan, who doesn't take these matters lightly, and for several months, Mr. Clarke was pursued relentlessly over a range of suggestions about what he would have thought if he had thought something else had been said at a time when something else was not said." Mr. Duncan—"I got three pages a day out of him, too." Mr. Lowrey—"Well, that was a good result. It always reminds me of a story that I now venture to tell the court as well, since my friend interrupts me in this rude manner. It’s the story of the pickerel and the roach. My friend, Professor Von Reisenberg from the University of Ghent, conducted a series of investigations into the ability of various animals to receive ideas. Among other things, he placed a pickerel in a tank with water, separated in the middle by a transparent glass plate, and on the other side, he put a red roach. Now, Your Honors, you both know how much a pickerel loves a red roach, and I have no doubt you remember he is a fish with a very low forehead and an insatiable appetite. When this pickerel saw the red roach through the glass, he made one of those powerful lunges that usually leads to the downfall of whatever stands in his path; however, he didn’t reach the red roach. He definitely got an impression, but it wasn’t enough to discourage him, so he immediately tried again and kept trying for three-quarters of an hour. By the end of that time, he seemed a bit shaken and discouraged, so he stopped, and the red roach was taken out for that day while the pickerel remained. The next day, the red roach was returned, and the pickerel had completely forgotten the impressions from the first day, so he tried again. At the end of the second day, the roach was taken out again. This continued—not for as long as my friend Clarke’s effort to devour him—but for about three weeks. By the end of those three weeks, the time the pickerel spent trying each day had gotten shorter and shorter, until finally, it was discovered that he didn’t try at all. The glass plate was then removed, and the pickerel and the red roach swam around together in perfect peace afterward. The pickerel likely attributed all the shaking and the rebuff he received to the roach. And that’s pretty much the state my brother Duncan and my friend Clarke were in at the end of this examination." Mr. Duncan—"I noticed during the redirect that Mr. Clarke changed color." Mr. Lowrey—"Well, perhaps he was a different kind of roach then; but you didn’t manage to catch him. "I urge your Honors to consider Mr. Clarke's testimony through the lens of the anecdote about the pickerel and the roach."
Owing to long-protracted delays incident to the taking of testimony and preparation for trial, the argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals was not had until the late spring of 1892, and its decision in favor of the Edison Lamp patent was filed on October 4, 1892, MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF THE PATENT ITSELF.
Due to the lengthy delays related to gathering testimony and getting ready for the trial, the argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals didn’t happen until late spring of 1892, and its decision in favor of the Edison Lamp patent was filed on October 4, 1892, MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF THE PATENT ITSELF.
As the term of the patent had been limited under the law, because certain foreign patents had been issued to Edison before that in this country, there was now but a short time left for enjoyment of the exclusive rights contemplated by the statute and granted to Edison and his assigns by the terms of the patent itself. A vigorous and aggressive legal campaign was therefore inaugurated by the Edison Electric Light Company against the numerous infringing companies and individuals that had sprung up while the main suit was pending. Old suits were revived and new ones instituted. Injunctions were obtained against many old offenders, and it seemed as though the Edison interests were about to come into their own for the brief unexpired term of the fundamental patent, when a new bombshell was dropped into the Edison camp in the shape of an alleged anticipation of the invention forty years previously by one Henry Goebel. Thus, in 1893, the litigation was reopened, and a protracted series of stubbornly contested conflicts was fought in the courts.
Since the patent's term was limited by law because certain foreign patents were granted to Edison before the ones issued in this country, there was now only a short time left for Edison and his assigns to enjoy the exclusive rights provided by the patent. As a result, the Edison Electric Light Company launched an aggressive legal campaign against the many companies and individuals that had emerged while the main lawsuit was ongoing. Old cases were revived, and new ones were filed. Injunctions were secured against many repeat offenders, and it looked like the Edison interests were finally going to benefit from the remaining term of the basic patent. However, a new shock hit the Edison camp when it was claimed that the invention had been anticipated forty years earlier by a man named Henry Goebel. Thus, in 1893, the litigation was reopened, leading to a lengthy series of fiercely contested court battles.
Goebel's claims were not unknown to the Edison Company, for as far back as 1882 they had been officially brought to its notice coupled with an offer of sale for a few thousand dollars. A very brief examination into their merits, however, sufficed to demonstrate most emphatically that Goebel had never made a practical incandescent lamp, nor had he ever contributed a single idea or device bearing, remotely or directly, on the development of the art. Edison and his company, therefore, rejected the offer unconditionally and declined to enter into any arrangements whatever with Goebel. During the prosecution of the suits in 1893 it transpired that the Goebel claims had also been investigated by the counsel of the defendant company in the principal litigation already related, but although every conceivable defence and anticipation had been dragged into the case during the many years of its progress, the alleged Goebel anticipation was not even touched upon therein. From this fact it is quite apparent that they placed no credence on its bona fides.
Goebel's claims were known to the Edison Company as early as 1882 when they were officially presented along with a sale offer for a few thousand dollars. A brief look into their validity clearly showed that Goebel had never created a practical incandescent lamp nor had he contributed any ideas or devices related to the development of the technology. Consequently, Edison and his company rejected the offer outright and decided not to make any agreements with Goebel. During the lawsuits in 1893, it became evident that Goebel's claims had also been examined by the lawyers of the defendant company in the main case already mentioned. However, despite every possible defense and prior art being discussed over the years, the supposed Goebel prior art was never brought up at all. This indicates they did not believe in its credibility.
But desperate cases call for desperate remedies. Some of the infringing lamp-manufacturing concerns, which during the long litigation had grown strong and lusty, and thus far had not been enjoined by the court, now saw injunctions staring them in the face, and in desperation set up the Goebel so-called anticipation as a defence in the suits brought against them.
But desperate situations require desperate solutions. Some of the lamp-manufacturing companies that had grown strong and robust during the lengthy legal battle, and had not yet been stopped by the court, now faced injunctions looming over them. In their desperation, they used the so-called Goebel anticipation as a defense in the lawsuits filed against them.
This German watchmaker, Goebel, located in the East Side of New York City, had undoubtedly been interested, in a desultory kind of way, in simple physical phenomena, and a few trifling experiments made by him some forty or forty-five years previously were magnified and distorted into brilliant and all-comprehensive discoveries and inventions. Avalanches of affidavits of himself, "his sisters and his cousins and his aunts," practically all persons in ordinary walks of life, and of old friends, contributed a host of recollections that seemed little short of miraculous in their detailed accounts of events of a scientific nature that were said to have occurred so many years before. According to affidavits of Goebel himself and some of his family, nothing that would anticipate Edison's claim had been omitted from his work, for he (Goebel) claimed to have employed the all-glass globe, into which were sealed platinum wires carrying a tenuous carbon filament, from which the occluded gases had been liberated during the process of high exhaustion. He had even determined upon bamboo as the best material for filaments. On the face of it he was seemingly gifted with more than human prescience, for in at least one of his exhibit lamps, said to have been made twenty years previously, he claimed to have employed processes which Edison and his associates had only developed by several years of experience in making thousands of lamps!
This German watchmaker, Goebel, located on the East Side of New York City, appeared to have a casual interest in basic physical phenomena. Some minor experiments he conducted about forty or forty-five years earlier were exaggerated into incredible discoveries and inventions. A flood of affidavits from him, "his sisters and his cousins and his aunts," along with numerous friends from everyday life, provided a wealth of memories that seemed almost miraculous in their intricate details of scientific events said to have taken place many years ago. Based on affidavits from Goebel and some family members, nothing that could have preceded Edison's claims was left out of his work. He (Goebel) asserted that he had used an all-glass globe, sealed with platinum wires carrying a delicate carbon filament, from which trapped gases had been removed during high exhaustion. He even decided that bamboo was the best material for filaments. On the surface, he seemed to possess an almost supernatural foresight, as in at least one of his exhibit lamps, supposedly made twenty years earlier, he claimed to have utilized processes that Edison and his team had only refined after years of experience and making thousands of lamps!
The Goebel story was told by the affidavits in an ingenuous manner, with a wealth of simple homely detail that carried on its face an appearance of truth calculated to deceive the elect, had not the elect been somewhat prepared by their investigation made some eleven years before.
The Goebel story was presented through the affidavits in a straightforward way, filled with ordinary details that seemed true enough to mislead the elite, if the elite hadn’t already been somewhat informed by their investigation from about eleven years earlier.
The story was met by the Edison interests with counter-affidavits, showing its utter improbabilities and absurdities from the standpoint of men of science and others versed in the history and practice of the art; also affidavits of other acquaintances and neighbors of Goebel flatly denying the exhibitions he claimed to have made. The issue thus being joined, the legal battle raged over different sections of the country. A number of contumeliously defiant infringers in various cities based fond hopes of immunity upon the success of this Goebel evidence, but were defeated. The attitude of the courts is well represented in the opinion of Judge Colt, rendered in a motion for injunction against the Beacon Vacuum Pump and Electrical Company. The defence alleged the Goebel anticipation, in support of which it offered in evidence four lamps, Nos. 1, 2, and 3 purporting to have been made before 1854, and No. 4 before 1872. After a very full review of the facts in the case, and a fair consideration of the defendants' affidavits, Judge Colt in his opinion goes on to say:
The Edison interests responded to the story with counter-affidavits, highlighting its complete unlikelihood and absurdity from the perspective of scientists and others familiar with the history and practice of the field; they also presented affidavits from other friends and neighbors of Goebel who outright denied the claims he made about his demonstrations. With the issue at hand, a legal battle erupted across various parts of the country. Several defiantly noncompliant infringers in different cities based their hopes for immunity on the success of this Goebel evidence but ultimately lost. The courts' stance is well illustrated in the opinion of Judge Colt, delivered during a motion for an injunction against the Beacon Vacuum Pump and Electrical Company. The defense cited the Goebel anticipation, supporting its case with four lamps, Nos. 1, 2, and 3, claiming they were made before 1854, and No. 4 before 1872. After thoroughly reviewing the facts of the case and fairly considering the defendants' affidavits, Judge Colt states in his opinion:
"It is extremely improbable that Henry Goebel constructed a practical incandescent lamp in 1854. This is manifest from the history of the art for the past fifty years, the electrical laws which since that time have been discovered as applicable to the incandescent lamp, the imperfect means which then existed for obtaining a vacuum, the high degree of skill necessary in the construction of all its parts, and the crude instruments with which Goebel worked.
"It is highly unlikely that Henry Goebel created a practical incandescent lamp in 1854. This is clear from the history of the technology over the past fifty years, the electrical laws that have been discovered since then that apply to the incandescent lamp, the inadequate methods available at that time for creating a vacuum, the advanced level of skill required to build all its components, and the basic tools with which Goebel worked."
"Whether Goebel made the fiddle-bow lamps, 1, 2, and 3, is not necessary to determine. The weight of evidence on this motion is in the direction that he made these lamp or lamps similar in general appearance, though it is manifest that few, if any, of the many witnesses who saw the Goebel lamp could form an accurate judgment of the size of the filament or burner. But assuming they were made, they do not anticipate the invention of Edison. At most they were experimental toys used to advertise his telescope, or to flash a light upon his clock, or to attract customers to his shop. They were crudely constructed, and their life was brief. They could not be used for domestic purposes. They were in no proper sense the practical commercial lamp of Edison. The literature of the art is full of better lamps, all of which are held not to anticipate the Edison patent.
"Whether Goebel made the fiddle-bow lamps, 1, 2, and 3, isn't essential to figure out. The evidence leans towards him making these lamps or ones that looked similar, although it's clear that few, if any, of the many witnesses who saw the Goebel lamp could accurately judge the size of the filament or burner. But even if they were made, they don't represent Edison's invention. At best, they were experimental gadgets used to promote his telescope, shine a light on his clock, or draw customers into his shop. They were poorly made and had a short lifespan. They weren't suitable for home use. They weren't the practical commercial lamp that Edison created. The literature in the field is filled with better lamps, none of which are considered to pre-date the Edison patent."
"As for Lamp No. 4, I cannot but view it with suspicion. It presents a new appearance. The reason given for not introducing it before the hearing is unsatisfactory. This lamp, to my mind, envelops with a cloud of distrust the whole Goebel story. It is simply impossible under the circumstances to believe that a lamp so constructed could have been made by Goebel before 1872. Nothing in the evidence warrants such a supposition, and other things show it to be untrue. This lamp has a carbon filament, platinum leading-in wires, a good vacuum, and is well sealed and highly finished. It is said that this lamp shows no traces of mercury in the bulb because the mercury was distilled, but Goebel says nothing about distilled mercury in his first affidavit, and twice he speaks of the particles of mercury clinging to the inside of the chamber, and for that reason he constructed a Geissler pump after he moved to 468 Grand Street, which was in 1877. Again, if this lamp has been in his possession since before 1872, as he and his son swear, why was it not shown to Mr. Crosby, of the American Company, when he visited his shop in 1881 and was much interested in his lamps? Why was it not shown to Mr. Curtis, the leading counsel for the defendants in the New York cases, when he was asked to produce a lamp and promised to do so? Why did not his son take this lamp to Mr. Bull's office in 1892, when he took the old fiddle-bow lamps, 1, 2, and 3? Why did not his son take this lamp to Mr. Eaton's office in 1882, when he tried to negotiate the sale of his father's inventions to the Edison Company? A lamp so constructed and made before 1872 was worth a large sum of money to those interested in defeating the Edison patent like the American Company, and Goebel was not a rich man. Both he and one of his sons were employed in 1881 by the American Company. Why did he not show this lamp to McMahon when he called in the interest of the American Company and talked over the electrical matters? When Mr. Dreyer tried to organize a company in 1882, and procured an option from him of all his inventions relating to electric lighting for which $925 was paid, and when an old lamp of this kind was of vital consequence and would have insured a fortune, why was it not forthcoming? Mr. Dreyer asked Goebel to produce an old lamp, and was especially anxious to find one pending his negotiations with the Edison Company for the sale of Goebel's inventions. Why did he not produce this lamp in his interviews with Bohm, of the American Company, or Moses, of the Edison Company, when it was for his interest to do so? The value of such an anticipation of the Edison lamp was made known to him. He was desirous of realizing upon his inventions. He was proud of his incandescent lamps, and was pleased to talk about them with anybody who would listen. Is it conceivable under all these circumstances, that he should have had this all-important lamp in his possession from 1872 to 1893, and yet no one have heard of it or seen it except his son? It cannot be said that ignorance of the English language offers an excuse. He knew English very well although Bohm and Dreyer conversed with him in German. His children spoke English. Neither his ignorance nor his simplicity prevented him from taking out three patents: the first in 1865 for a sewing-machine hemmer, and the last in 1882 for an improvement in incandescent lamps. If he made Lamp No. 4 previous to 1872, why was it not also patented?
"As for Lamp No. 4, I can't help but look at it with suspicion. It looks different. The explanation for not showing it before the hearing is unsatisfactory. In my opinion, this lamp casts doubt over the entire Goebel story. It's just impossible to believe that a lamp like this could have been made by Goebel before 1872, given the circumstances. There's no evidence to support that idea, and other facts prove it wrong. This lamp has a carbon filament, platinum leading wires, a good vacuum, and is well-sealed and nicely finished. It’s claimed that this lamp shows no signs of mercury in the bulb because the mercury was distilled, but Goebel doesn't mention distilled mercury in his first affidavit. Twice, he talks about mercury particles sticking to the inside of the chamber, which is why he built a Geissler pump after moving to 468 Grand Street in 1877. Furthermore, if this lamp has been in his possession since before 1872, as he and his son state, why wasn't it shown to Mr. Crosby of the American Company when he visited his shop in 1881 and showed a lot of interest in his lamps? Why didn’t it get presented to Mr. Curtis, the main lawyer for the defendants in the New York cases, when he was asked to bring a lamp and said he would? Why didn’t his son take this lamp to Mr. Bull's office in 1892 when he took the old fiddle-bow lamps, 1, 2, and 3? Why didn’t his son bring this lamp to Mr. Eaton's office in 1882 when he tried to negotiate selling his father's inventions to the Edison Company? A lamp built like this before 1872 would have been worth a lot to those looking to challenge the Edison patent, like the American Company, and Goebel wasn't wealthy. Both he and one of his sons were employed by the American Company in 1881. Why didn’t he show this lamp to McMahon when he visited on behalf of the American Company to discuss electrical matters? When Mr. Dreyer was trying to put together a company in 1882 and got an option from him for all his electric lighting inventions for which $925 was paid, and an old lamp like this could have been crucial and made him a fortune, why wasn’t it brought forward? Mr. Dreyer asked Goebel to show an old lamp and was especially eager to find one during negotiations with the Edison Company for the sale of Goebel's inventions. Why didn’t he show this lamp during his meetings with Bohm from the American Company or Moses from the Edison Company, when it would have been in his interest to do so? He was aware of the value of such an early version of the Edison lamp. He wanted to capitalize on his inventions. He was proud of his incandescent lamps and enjoyed discussing them with anyone who would listen. Is it believable that he could have had this vital lamp from 1872 to 1893, yet no one except his son ever heard of or saw it? Ignorance of the English language isn’t an excuse. He understood English well, even though Bohm and Dreyer spoke with him in German. His children spoke English. His lack of knowledge or naivety didn't stop him from getting three patents: the first in 1865 for a sewing-machine hemmer and the last in 1882 for an improvement in incandescent lamps. If he made Lamp No. 4 before 1872, why wasn’t it also patented?"
"There are other circumstances which throw doubt on this alleged Goebel anticipation. The suit against the United States Electric Lighting Company was brought in the Southern District of New York in 1885. Large interests were at stake, and the main defence to the Edison patent was based on prior inventions. This Goebel claim was then investigated by the leading counsel for the defence, Mr. Curtis. It was further inquired into in 1892, in the case against the Sawyer-Man Company. It was brought to the attention and considered by the Edison Company in 1882. It was at that time known to the American Company, who hoped by this means to defeat the monopoly under the Edison patent. Dreyer tried to organize a company for its purchase. Young Goebel tried to sell it. It must have been known to hundreds of people. And now when the Edison Company after years of litigation, leaving but a short time for the patent to run, have obtained a final adjudication establishing its validity, this claim is again resurrected to defeat the operation of the judgment so obtained. A court in equity should not look with favor on such a defence. Upon the evidence here presented, I agree with the first impression of Mr. Curtis and with the opinion of Mr. Dickerson that whatever Goebel did must be considered as an abandoned experiment.
There are other circumstances that raise doubts about this supposed Goebel anticipation. The lawsuit against the United States Electric Lighting Company was filed in the Southern District of New York in 1885. There were significant interests at stake, and the main defense against the Edison patent was based on earlier inventions. This Goebel claim was then looked into by the leading counsel for the defense, Mr. Curtis. It was further examined in 1892 during the case against the Sawyer-Man Company. The Edison Company became aware of it in 1882. At that time, it was known to the American Company, which hoped to use it to challenge the monopoly of the Edison patent. Dreyer tried to form a company to purchase it. Young Goebel attempted to sell it. It must have been known to hundreds of people. Now, after years of litigation and with little time left on the patent, the Edison Company has finally secured a ruling that confirms its validity, and this claim is being revived to undermine that ruling. A court of equity should not favor such a defense. Based on the evidence presented, I concur with Mr. Curtis's initial impression and Mr. Dickerson's opinion that whatever Goebel did should be regarded as an abandoned experiment.
"It has often been laid down that a meritorious invention is not to be defeated by something which rests in speculation or experiment, or which is rudimentary or incomplete.
"It has often been stated that a valuable invention should not be undermined by something that is merely speculative or experimental, or that is basic or unfinished."
"The law requires not conjecture, but certainty. It is easy after an important invention has gone into public use for persons to come forward with claims that they invented the same thing years before, and to endeavor to establish this by the recollection of witnesses as to events long past. Such evidence is to be received with great caution, and the presumption of novelty arising from the grant of the patent is not to be overcome except upon clear and convincing proof.
"The law demands certainty, not speculation. Once an important invention is publicly used, it's common for people to claim they invented it years earlier and to try to back this up with witness memories of events from long ago. This kind of evidence should be viewed with great caution, and the assumption of novelty from the patent grant should only be challenged with clear and convincing proof."
"When the defendant company entered upon the manufacture of incandescent lamps in May, 1891, it well knew the consequences which must follow a favorable decision for the Edison Company in the New York case."
"When the defendant company started making incandescent lamps in May 1891, it was fully aware of the repercussions that would follow a favorable ruling for the Edison Company in the New York case."
The injunction was granted.
The injunction was approved.
Other courts took practically the same view of the Goebel story as was taken by Judge Colt, and the injunctions asked in behalf of the Edison interests were granted on all applications except one in St. Louis, Missouri, in proceedings instituted against a strong local concern of that city.
Other courts had almost the same perspective on the Goebel story as Judge Colt did, and the injunctions requested for the Edison interests were granted in all cases except one in St. Louis, Missouri, where proceedings were initiated against a strong local company in that city.
Thus, at the eleventh hour in the life of this important patent, after a long period of costly litigation, Edison and his associates were compelled to assume the defensive against a claimant whose utterly baseless pretensions had already been thoroughly investigated and rejected years before by every interested party, and ultimately, on examination by the courts, pronounced legally untenable, if not indeed actually fraudulent. Irritating as it was to be forced into the position of combating a proposition so well known to be preposterous and insincere, there was nothing else to do but to fight this fabrication with all the strenuous and deadly earnestness that would have been brought to bear on a really meritorious defence. Not only did this Goebel episode divert for a long time the energies of the Edison interests from activities in other directions, but the cost of overcoming the extravagantly absurd claims ran up into hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Thus, at the last minute in the life of this important patent, after a long period of expensive legal battles, Edison and his team had to defend themselves against a claimant whose completely unfounded claims had already been thoroughly investigated and dismissed years earlier by everyone involved, and ultimately, upon review by the courts, deemed legally unsustainable, if not outright fraudulent. Frustrating as it was to be forced into battling a claim so clearly ridiculous and dishonest, there was nothing else to do but to fight this fabrication with all the intense and serious effort that would have been put into a genuinely valid defense. Not only did this Goebel situation drain the Edison team's focus from other pursuits for a long time, but the expenses to counter these wildly absurd claims soared into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Another quotation from Major Eaton is of interest in this connection:
Another quote from Major Eaton is relevant here:
"Now a word about the Goebel case. I took personal charge of running down this man and his pretensions in the section of the city where he lived and among his old neighbors. They were a typical East Side lot—ignorant, generally stupid, incapable of long memory, but ready to oblige a neighbor and to turn an easy dollar by putting a cross-mark at the bottom of a forthcoming friendly affidavit. I can say in all truth and justice that their testimony was utterly false, and that the lawyers who took it must have known it.
"Now, let’s talk about the Goebel case. I personally took charge of tracking down this guy and his claims in the area where he lived and among his old neighbors. They were a typical East Side bunch—ignorant, generally not too bright, unable to remember things for long, but willing to help a neighbor out and make a quick buck by adding a cross-mark at the bottom of a friendly affidavit. I can honestly say their testimony was completely false, and the lawyers who took it must have known that."
"The Goebel case emphasizes two defects in the court procedure in patent cases. One is that they may be spun out almost interminably, even, possibly, to the end of the life of the patent; the other is that the judge who decides the case does not see the witnesses. That adverse decision at St. Louis would never have been made if the court could have seen the men who swore for Goebel. When I met Mr. F. P. Fish on his return from St. Louis, after he had argued the Edison side, he felt keenly that disadvantage, to say nothing of the hopeless difficulty of educating the court."
The Goebel case highlights two flaws in the court process for patent cases. One is that they can drag on almost endlessly, potentially lasting until the patent expires; the other is that the judge who makes the decision doesn’t actually see the witnesses. That unfavorable ruling in St. Louis wouldn’t have happened if the court could have met the people who testified for Goebel. When I ran into Mr. F. P. Fish after he returned from St. Louis, where he argued for Edison, he strongly felt that disadvantage, not to mention the frustrating challenge of trying to inform the court.
In the earliest days of the art, when it was apparent that incandescent lighting had come to stay, the Edison Company was a shining mark at which the shafts of the dishonest were aimed. Many there were who stood ready to furnish affidavits that they or some one else whom they controlled had really invented the lamp, but would obligingly withdraw and leave Edison in possession of the field on payment of money. Investigation of these cases, however, revealed invariably the purely fraudulent nature of all such offers, which were uniformly declined.
In the early days of the art, when it was clear that electric lighting was here to stay, the Edison Company became a target for the dishonest. Many individuals were prepared to provide affidavits claiming that they or someone they controlled had actually invented the lamp, but they would readily back down and leave Edison in control of the market in exchange for money. However, investigations into these claims consistently uncovered the completely fraudulent nature of these offers, which were always rejected.
As the incandescent light began to advance rapidly in public favor, the immense proportions of the future market became sufficiently obvious to tempt unauthorized persons to enter the field and become manufacturers. When the lamp became a thoroughly established article it was not a difficult matter to copy it, especially when there were employees to be hired away at increased pay, and their knowledge utilized by the more unscrupulous of these new competitors. This is not conjecture but known to be a fact, and the practice continued many years, during which new lamp companies sprang up on every side. Hence, it is not surprising that, on the whole, the Edison lamp litigation was not less remarkable for quantity than quality. Between eighty and ninety separate suits upon Edison's fundamental lamp and detail patents were brought in the courts of the United States and prosecuted to completion.
As incandescent light became increasingly popular, the huge potential of the future market became clear, attracting unauthorized individuals to jump in and start manufacturing. Once the lamp was fully established, copying it wasn't difficult, especially with employees being lured away for higher pay, and their expertise exploited by the more unscrupulous new competitors. This isn't just speculation; it's a known fact, and this practice persisted for many years, leading to the emergence of new lamp companies all around. Therefore, it's not surprising that the Edison lamp litigation was notable both in terms of quantity and quality. Between eighty and ninety separate lawsuits regarding Edison's core lamp and detail patents were filed in U.S. courts and carried through to completion.
In passing it may be mentioned that in England France, and Germany also the Edison fundamental lamp patent was stubbornly fought in the judicial arena, and his claim to be the first inventor of practical incandescent lighting was uniformly sustained in all those countries.
In passing, it’s worth noting that in England, France, and Germany, the Edison fundamental lamp patent was fiercely contested in court, and his claim to be the first inventor of practical incandescent lighting was consistently upheld in all those countries.
Infringement was not, however, confined to the lamp alone, but, in America, extended all along the line of Edison's patents relating to the production and distribution of electric light, including those on dynamos, motors, distributing systems, sockets, switches, and other details which he had from time to time invented. Consequently, in order to protect its interests at all points, the Edison Company had found it necessary to pursue a vigorous policy of instituting legal proceedings against the infringers of these various patents, and, in addition to the large number of suits on the lamp alone, not less than one hundred and twenty-five other separate actions, involving some fifty or more of Edison's principal electric-lighting patents, were brought against concerns which were wrongfully appropriating his ideas and actively competing with his companies in the market.
Infringement wasn't limited to just the lamp; in America, it also included the full range of Edison's patents related to producing and distributing electric light. This covered everything from dynamos and motors to distributing systems, sockets, switches, and other inventions he had come up with over time. As a result, the Edison Company realized it was essential to aggressively pursue legal action against those infringing on these various patents. In addition to the numerous lawsuits focused solely on the lamp, there were at least one hundred and twenty-five separate lawsuits involving around fifty of Edison's key electric-lighting patents against companies that were improperly using his ideas and competing with his businesses in the marketplace.
The ramifications of this litigation became so extensive and complex as to render it necessary to institute a special bureau, or department, through which the immense detail could be systematically sifted, analyzed, and arranged in collaboration with the numerous experts and counsel responsible for the conduct of the various cases. This department was organized in 1889 by Major Eaton, who was at this time and for some years afterward its general counsel.
The impact of this lawsuit became so vast and complicated that it was essential to create a special bureau or department to systematically sort, analyze, and organize the extensive details in collaboration with the many experts and lawyers involved in the various cases. This department was established in 1889 by Major Eaton, who was its general counsel at that time and for several years afterward.
In the selection of the head of this department a man of methodical and analytical habit of mind was necessary, capable of clear reasoning, and at the same time one who had gained a thoroughly practical experience in electric light and power fields, and the choice fell upon Mr. W. J. Jenks, the manager of the Edison central station at Brockton, Massachusetts. He had resigned that position in 1885, and had spent the intervening period in exploiting the Edison municipal system of lighting, as well as taking an active part in various other branches of the Edison enterprises.
In choosing the head of this department, we needed someone who was methodical and analytical, able to think clearly. At the same time, this person needed to have solid practical experience in electric lighting and power. The decision was made to select Mr. W. J. Jenks, the manager of the Edison central station in Brockton, Massachusetts. He had stepped down from that role in 1885 and had since been focused on developing the Edison municipal lighting system, while also actively participating in other aspects of the Edison ventures.
Thus, throughout the life of Edison's patents on electric light, power, and distribution, the interminable legal strife has continued from day to day, from year to year. Other inventors, some of them great and notable, have been coming into the field since the foundation of the art, patents have multiplied exceedingly, improvement has succeeded improvement, great companies have grown greater, new concerns have come into existence, coalitions and mergers have taken place, all tending to produce changes in methods, but not much in diminution of patent litigation. While Edison has not for a long time past interested himself particularly in electric light and power inventions, the bureau which was initiated under the old regime in 1889 still continues, enlarged in scope, directed by its original chief, but now conducted under the auspices of several allied companies whose great volumes of combined patents (including those of Edison) cover a very wide range of the electrical field.
Throughout the life of Edison's patents on electric light, power, and distribution, the endless legal battles have gone on day in and day out, year after year. Since the inception of the field, many other inventors, some truly remarkable, have entered the market, and patents have significantly increased. Innovations have come one after another, major companies have expanded even further, new businesses have emerged, and mergers and partnerships have occurred, all leading to changes in methods but not much reduction in patent lawsuits. While Edison hasn't been particularly involved in electric light and power inventions for a long time, the bureau he started back in 1889 is still running, now with a broader focus, led by its original head but managed under the support of several allied companies. Their combined patents, which include Edison's, cover a vast range of the electrical field.
As the general conception and theory of a lawsuit is the recovery of some material benefit, the lay mind is apt to conceive of great sums of money being awarded to a complainant by way of damages upon a favorable decision in an important patent case. It might, therefore, be natural to ask how far Edison or his companies have benefited pecuniarily by reason of the many belated victories they have scored in the courts. To this question a strict regard for truth compels the answer that they have not been benefited at all, not to the extent of a single dollar, so far as cash damages are concerned.
As people generally think of a lawsuit as a way to receive some kind of financial benefit, it's common for someone to imagine that a complainant might be awarded large sums of money in damages after winning an important patent case. Therefore, it's reasonable to wonder how much Edison or his companies have actually profited from the many delayed victories they've had in court. The honest answer to this question is that they haven't benefited financially at all, not even by a single dollar, when it comes to cash damages.
It is not to be denied, however, that substantial advantages have accrued to them more or less directly through the numerous favorable decisions obtained by them as a result of the enormous amount of litigation, in the prosecution of which so great a sum of money has been spent and so concentrated an amount of effort and time lavished. Indeed, it would be strange and unaccountable were the results otherwise. While the benefits derived were not directly pecuniary in their nature, they were such as tended to strengthen commercially the position of the rightful owners of the patents. Many irresponsible and purely piratical concerns were closed altogether; others were compelled to take out royalty licenses; consolidations of large interests were brought about; the public was gradually educated to a more correct view of the true merits of conflicting claims, and, generally speaking, the business has been greatly unified and brought within well-defined and controllable lines.
It's undeniable that substantial advantages have come to them, more or less directly, from the numerous favorable rulings they've achieved following the extensive litigation, during which a substantial amount of money has been spent along with a significant amount of effort and time. In fact, it would be odd and unexplainable if the outcomes were any different. While the benefits gained weren't directly financial, they did help to strengthen the commercial position of the rightful patent owners. Many reckless and outright piratical businesses were shut down entirely; others were forced to obtain royalty licenses; major interests were consolidated; the public gradually developed a better understanding of the true merits of the competing claims, and overall, the industry has become much more unified and organized within clear and manageable lines.
Not only in relation to his electric light and power inventions has the progress of Edison and his associates been attended by legal controversy all through the years of their exploitation, but also in respect to other inventions, notably those relating to the phonograph and to motion pictures.
Not only in connection with his inventions related to electric light and power has Edison's progress and that of his team faced legal disputes throughout the years of their use, but also regarding other inventions, especially those linked to the phonograph and motion pictures.
The increasing endeavors of infringers to divert into their own pockets some of the proceeds arising from the marketing of the devices covered by Edison's inventions on these latter lines, necessitated the institution by him, some years ago, of a legal department which, as in the case of the light inventions, was designed to consolidate all law and expert work and place it under the management of a general counsel. The department is of considerable extent, including a number of resident and other associate counsel, and a general office staff, all of whom are constantly engaged from day to day in patent litigation and other legal work necessary to protect the Edison interests. Through their labors the old story is reiterated in the contesting of approximate but conflicting claims, the never-ending effort to suppress infringement, and the destruction as far as possible of the commercial pirates who set sail upon the seas of all successful enterprises. The details, circumstances, and technical questions are, of course, different from those relating to other classes of inventions, and although there has been no cause celebre concerning the phonograph and motion-picture patents, the contention is as sharp and strenuous as it was in the cases relating to electric lighting and heavy current technics.
The growing efforts by infringers to take some of the profits from the sale of devices related to Edison's inventions made it necessary for him to establish a legal department a few years ago. Similar to the situation with his lighting inventions, this department was set up to consolidate all legal and expert work under the supervision of a general counsel. The department is quite extensive and includes several resident and associate counsels, along with a general office staff. They are all consistently involved in patent litigation and other legal matters needed to protect Edison's interests. Their work continues the familiar story of battling against closely contested, conflicting claims, the ongoing fight to stop infringement, and the efforts to minimize the impact of commercial pirates who take advantage of successful ventures. The specifics and technical issues are, of course, different from those related to other types of inventions, and while there hasn’t been a highly publicized case regarding the phonograph and motion-picture patents, the competition is just as intense and vigorous as it was in the cases involving electric lighting and heavy current technologies.
Mr. Edison's storage battery and the poured cement house have not yet reached the stage of great commercial enterprises, and therefore have not yet risen to the dignity of patent litigation. If, however, the experience of past years is any criterion, there will probably come a time in the future when, despite present widely expressed incredulity and contemptuous sniffs of unbelief in the practicability of his ideas in these directions, ultimate success will give rise to a series of hotly contested legal conflicts such as have signalized the practical outcome of his past efforts in other lines.
Mr. Edison's storage battery and the poured cement house haven't yet become major commercial ventures, so they haven't reached the level of patent disputes. However, if past experience is any indication, there will likely come a time when, despite the current widespread skepticism and dismissive reactions to the feasibility of his ideas in these areas, eventual success will lead to a number of heated legal battles similar to those that have marked the practical results of his previous work in other fields.
When it is considered what Edison has done, what the sum and substance of his contributions to human comfort and happiness have been, the results, as measured by legal success, have been pitiable. With the exception of the favorable decision on the incandescent lamp filament patent, coming so late, however, that but little practical good was accomplished, the reader may search the law-books in vain for a single decision squarely and fairly sustaining a single patent of first order. There never was a monopoly in incandescent electric lighting, and even from the earliest days competitors and infringers were in the field reaping the benefits, and though defeated in the end, paying not a cent of tribute. The market was practically as free and open as if no patent existed. There never was a monopoly in the phonograph; practically all of the vital inventions were deliberately appropriated by others, and the inventor was laughed at for his pains. Even so beautiful a process as that for the duplication of phonograph records was solemnly held by a Federal judge as lacking invention—as being obvious to any one. The mere fact that Edison spent years of his life in developing that process counted for nothing.
When you think about what Edison has accomplished and how much his contributions have added to people's comfort and happiness, his legal successes are quite disappointing. Aside from the late favorable ruling on the incandescent lamp filament patent, which didn’t result in much practical benefit, you can search legal records and find no decisions that truly support a single major patent. There was never a monopoly on incandescent electric lighting; right from the start, competitors and infringers were taking advantage without paying a dime, and although they eventually lost, they didn’t owe anything. The market was essentially as open and free as if there were no patents at all. There was likewise no monopoly on the phonograph; almost all of the key inventions were intentionally taken by others, and the inventor was mocked for his efforts. Even a beautifully crafted process for duplicating phonograph records was dismissed by a Federal judge as lacking inventiveness—something anyone could have figured out. The fact that Edison dedicated years to developing that process didn’t matter at all.
The invention of the three-wire system, which, when it was first announced as saving over 60 per cent. of copper in the circuits, was regarded as an utter impossibility—this patent was likewise held by a Federal judge to be lacking in invention. In the motion-picture art, infringements began with its very birth, and before the inevitable litigation could be terminated no less than ten competitors were in the field, with whom compromises had to be made.
The invention of the three-wire system, which was initially said to save over 60 percent of copper in the circuits, was considered completely impossible at the time—it was also deemed to lack true invention by a Federal judge. In the film industry, copyright infringements started right from its inception, and before the unavoidable legal battles could be resolved, no fewer than ten competitors were already in the market, requiring various compromises to be reached.
In a foreign country, Edison would have undoubtedly received signal honors; in his own country he has won the respect and admiration of millions; but in his chosen field as an inventor and as a patentee his reward has been empty. The courts abroad have considered his patents in a liberal spirit and given him his due; the decisions in this country have fallen wide of the mark. We make no criticism of our Federal judges; as a body they are fair, able, and hard-working; but they operate under a system of procedure that stifles absolutely the development of inventive genius.
In another country, Edison would have definitely received high honors; in his own country, he has earned the respect and admiration of millions; but in his chosen field as an inventor and patent holder, his rewards have been lacking. Courts abroad have evaluated his patents fairly and recognized his contributions; however, the decisions in this country have missed the mark. We aren’t criticizing our Federal judges; overall, they are fair, capable, and diligent; but they work within a system that completely stifles the growth of inventive talent.
Until that system is changed and an opportunity offered for a final, swift, and economical adjudication of patent rights, American inventors may well hesitate before openly disclosing their inventions to the public, and may seriously consider the advisability of retaining them as "trade secrets."
Until that system is changed and a chance is provided for a conclusive, quick, and cost-effective resolution of patent rights, American inventors might hesitate to share their inventions publicly and may think seriously about keeping them as "trade secrets."
CHAPTER XXIX
THE SOCIAL SIDE OF EDISON
THE title of this chapter might imply that there is an unsocial side to Edison. In a sense this is true, for no one is more impatient or intolerant of interruption when deeply engaged in some line of experiment. Then the caller, no matter how important or what his mission, is likely to realize his utter insignificance and be sent away without accomplishing his object. But, generally speaking, Edison is easy tolerance itself, with a peculiar weakness toward those who have the least right to make any demands on his time. Man is a social animal, and that describes Edison; but it does not describe accurately the inventor asking to be let alone.
THE title of this chapter might suggest that Edison has an unsocial side. In a way, that's true, because no one gets more impatient or intolerant of interruptions when he’s really focused on an experiment. When someone drops by, no matter how important they think they are or what they want, they often end up feeling completely insignificant and leave without achieving their goal. However, overall, Edison is incredibly tolerant, especially towards those who have the least right to ask for his time. People are social beings, and that fits Edison; but it doesn’t quite capture the inventor who just wants to be left alone.
Edison never sought Society; but "Society" has never ceased to seek him, and to-day, as ever, the pressure upon him to give up his work and receive honors, meet distinguished people, or attend public functions, is intense. Only two or three years ago, a flattering invitation came from one of the great English universities to receive a degree, but at that moment he was deep in experiments on his new storage battery, and nothing could budge him. He would not drop the work, and while highly appreciative of the proposed honor, let it go by rather than quit for a week or two the stern drudgery of probing for the fact and the truth. Whether one approves or not, it is at least admirable stoicism, of which the world has too little. A similar instance is that of a visit paid to the laboratory by some one bringing a gold medal from a foreign society. It was a very hot day in summer, the visitor was in full social regalia of silk hat and frock-coat, and insisted that he could deliver the medal only into Edison's hands. At that moment Edison, stripped pretty nearly down to the buff, was at the very crisis of an important experiment, and refused absolutely to be interrupted. He had neither sought nor expected the medal; and if the delegate didn't care to leave it he could take it away. At last Edison was overpersuaded, and, all dirty and perspiring as he was, received the medal rather than cause the visitor to come again. On one occasion, receiving a medal in New York, Edison forgot it on the ferry-boat and left it behind him. A few years ago, when Edison had received the Albert medal of the Royal Society of Arts, one of the present authors called at the laboratory to see it. Nobody knew where it was; hours passed before it could be found; and when at last the accompanying letter was produced, it had an office date stamp right over the signature of the royal president. A visitor to the laboratory with one of these medallic awards asked Edison if he had any others. "Oh yes," he said, "I have a couple of quarts more up at the house!" All this sounds like lack of appreciation, but it is anything else than that. While in Paris, in 1889, he wore the decoration of the Legion of Honor whenever occasion required, but at all other times turned the badge under his lapel "because he hated to have fellow-Americans think he was showing off." And any one who knows Edison will bear testimony to his utter absence of ostentation. It may be added that, in addition to the two quarts of medals up at the house, there will be found at Glenmont many other signal tokens of esteem and good-will—a beautiful cigar-case from the late Tsar of Russia, bronzes from the Government of Japan, steel trophies from Krupp, and a host of other mementos, to one of which he thus refers: "When the experiments with the light were going on at Menlo Park, Sarah Bernhardt came to America. One evening, Robert L. Cutting, of New York, brought her out to see the light. She was a terrific 'rubberneck.' She jumped all over the machinery, and I had one man especially to guard her dress. She wanted to know everything. She would speak in French, and Cutting would translate into English. She stayed there about an hour and a half. Bernhardt gave me two pictures, painted by herself, which she sent me from Paris."
Edison never chased after Society, but Society has always pursued him. Even today, the pressure for him to step away from his work to accept honors, meet notable people, or attend public events is overwhelming. Just a couple of years ago, he received a flattering invitation from one of the major English universities to accept a degree, but at that time, he was deeply engrossed in experiments for his new storage battery and wouldn’t budge. He wouldn’t abandon his work, and although he appreciated the honor, he let it pass rather than take a week or two away from the demanding labor of seeking out facts and truths. Whether you agree or not, it’s at least an admirable level of stoicism, which is in short supply in the world. Another example is when someone came to his lab to present a gold medal from a foreign society. It was a scorching summer day, the visitor was dressed in formal attire, complete with a top hat and frock coat, and insisted on delivering the medal directly to Edison. At that moment, Edison was nearly stripped down as he was in the middle of a crucial experiment and absolutely refused to be interrupted. He had neither sought nor anticipated the medal, and if the delegate didn’t want to leave it, he could take it back. Eventually, Edison was somewhat persuaded, and despite being dirty and sweaty, he accepted the medal to avoid making the visitor return. On one occasion in New York when he received a medal, he forgot it on the ferry and left it behind. A few years ago, after receiving the Albert medal from the Royal Society of Arts, one of the authors came to the lab to see it. No one knew where it was; after hours of searching, it finally turned up, and when the accompanying letter was found, it had the office date stamp right over the royal president's signature. A visitor to the lab with one of these medal awards asked Edison if he had any others. "Oh yes," he replied, "I have a couple of quarts more up at the house!" All of this might seem like a lack of appreciation, but that’s far from the truth. While in Paris in 1889, he wore the decoration of the Legion of Honor when appropriate, but at all other times, he tucked the badge beneath his lapel because he didn’t want fellow Americans thinking he was showing off. Anyone who knows Edison will confirm his complete lack of ostentation. Additionally, in that house, along with the two quarts of medals, there are many other tokens of respect and goodwill—a lovely cigar case from the late Tsar of Russia, bronzes from the Japanese government, steel trophies from Krupp, and plenty of other mementos. One time, when experiments with light were ongoing at Menlo Park, Sarah Bernhardt came to America. One evening, Robert L. Cutting from New York brought her to see the light. She was incredibly curious and jumped all over the machinery, so I had one person specifically assigned to guard her dress. She wanted to know everything. She spoke in French, and Cutting translated into English. She stayed for about an hour and a half. Bernhardt gave me two paintings she created and sent from Paris.
Reference has already been made to the callers upon Edison; and to give simply the names of persons of distinction would fill many pages of this record. Some were mere consumers of time; others were gladly welcomed, like Lord Kelvin, the greatest physicist of the last century, with whom Edison was always in friendly communication. "The first time I saw Lord Kelvin, he came to my laboratory at Menlo Park in 1876." (He reported most favorably on Edison's automatic telegraph system at the Philadelphia Exposition of 1876.) "I was then experimenting with sending eight messages simultaneously over a wire by means of synchronizing tuning-forks. I would take a wire with similar apparatus at both ends, and would throw it over on one set of instruments, take it away, and get it back so quickly that you would not miss it, thereby taking advantage of the rapidity of electricity to perform operations. On my local wire I got it to work very nicely. When Sir William Thomson (Kelvin) came in the room, he was introduced to me, and had a number of friends with him. He said: 'What have you here?' I told him briefly what it was. He then turned around, and to my great surprise explained the whole thing to his friends. Quite a different exhibition was given two weeks later by another well-known Englishman, also an electrician, who came in with his friends, and I was trying for two hours to explain it to him and failed."
Reference has already been made to the visitors who came to see Edison, and simply listing the names of notable figures would take up many pages of this record. Some were just time-wasters; others were warmly welcomed, like Lord Kelvin, the greatest physicist of the last century, with whom Edison always had friendly communication. "The first time I met Lord Kelvin, he visited my laboratory in Menlo Park in 1876." (He spoke very highly of Edison's automatic telegraph system at the Philadelphia Exposition of 1876.) "I was experimenting with sending eight messages at the same time over a wire using synchronized tuning forks. I would connect a wire with the same setup at both ends, throw it over to one set of instruments, quickly remove it, and get it back so fast that you wouldn’t even notice, leveraging the speed of electricity to perform operations. On my local wire, I got it to work perfectly. When Sir William Thomson (Kelvin) entered the room, he was introduced to me, and he had a number of friends with him. He asked, 'What do you have here?' I briefly explained it to him. To my surprise, he then turned around and explained the whole thing to his friends. A completely different experience occurred two weeks later with another well-known Englishman, also an electrician, who came in with his friends, and I struggled for two hours trying to explain it to him and failed."
After the introduction of the electric light, Edison was more than ever in demand socially, but he shunned functions like the plague, not only because of the serious interference with work, but because of his deafness. Some dinners he had to attend, but a man who ate little and heard less could derive practically no pleasure from them. "George Washington Childs was very anxious I should go down to Philadelphia to dine with him. I seldom went to dinners. He insisted I should go—that a special car would leave New York. It was for me to meet Mr. Joseph Chamberlain. We had the private car of Mr. Roberts, President of the Pennsylvania Railroad. We had one of those celebrated dinners that only Mr. Childs could give, and I heard speeches from Charles Francis Adams and different people. When I came back to the depot, Mr. Roberts was there, and insisted on carrying my satchel for me. I never could understand that."
After the electric light was introduced, Edison was in higher demand socially than ever, but he avoided social events like the plague, not just because they seriously disrupted his work, but also due to his deafness. He had to attend some dinners, but as a man who ate little and heard even less, he got hardly any enjoyment from them. "George Washington Childs was really eager for me to come to Philadelphia to have dinner with him. I rarely went to dinners. He insisted I should go, saying a special car would leave from New York. It was for me to meet Mr. Joseph Chamberlain. We had the private car of Mr. Roberts, the President of the Pennsylvania Railroad. We enjoyed one of those famous dinners that only Mr. Childs could host, and I listened to speeches from Charles Francis Adams and others. When I returned to the station, Mr. Roberts was there and insisted on carrying my bag for me. I never quite understood that."
Among the more distinguished visitors of the electric-lighting period was President Diaz, with whom Edison became quite intimate. "President Diaz, of Mexico, visited this country with Mrs. Diaz, a highly educated and beautiful woman. She spoke very good English. They both took a deep interest in all they saw. I don't know how it ever came about, as it is not in my line, but I seemed to be delegated to show them around. I took them to railroad buildings, electric-light plants, fire departments, and showed them a great variety of things. It lasted two days." Of another visit Edison says: "Sitting Bull and fifteen Sioux Indians came to Washington to see the Great Father, and then to New York, and went to the Goerck Street works. We could make some very good pyrotechnics there, so we determined to give the Indians a scare. But it didn't work. We had an arc there of a most terrifying character, but they never moved a muscle." Another episode at Goerck Street did not find the visitors quite so stoical. "In testing dynamos at Goerck Street we had a long flat belt running parallel with the floor, about four inches above it, and travelling four thousand feet a minute. One day one of the directors brought in three or four ladies to the works to see the new electric-light system. One of the ladies had a little poodle led by a string. The belt was running so smoothly and evenly, the poodle did not notice the difference between it and the floor, and got into the belt before we could do anything. The dog was whirled around forty or fifty times, and a little flat piece of leather came out—and the ladies fainted."
Among the more notable visitors during the electric-lighting era was President Diaz, who became quite close with Edison. "President Diaz of Mexico visited this country with Mrs. Diaz, a well-educated and beautiful woman. She spoke excellent English. They both showed a strong interest in everything they experienced. I can't explain how it happened, since it's not really my area, but I ended up being the one to show them around. I took them to railroad buildings, electric-light plants, fire departments, and showed them a wide range of things. It lasted for two days." Regarding another visit, Edison recalls: "Sitting Bull and fifteen Sioux Indians came to Washington to see the Great Father, and then to New York, where they visited the Goerck Street works. We could create some impressive pyrotechnics there, so we decided to try to scare the Indians. But it didn't work. We had an incredibly frightening arc there, but they didn’t flinch." Another incident at Goerck Street found the visitors less composed. "While testing dynamos at Goerck Street, we had a long flat belt running parallel to the floor, about four inches above it, moving at four thousand feet per minute. One day, one of the directors brought in three or four ladies to see the new electric-light system. One of the ladies had a small poodle on a string. The belt was so smooth and even that the poodle didn't realize the difference between it and the floor, and got caught in the belt before we could react. The dog was spun around forty or fifty times, and a little flat piece of leather came out—and the ladies fainted."
A very interesting period, on the social side, was the visit paid by Edison and his family to Europe in 1889, when he had made a splendid exhibit of his inventions and apparatus at the great Paris Centennial Exposition of that year, to the extreme delight of the French, who welcomed him with open arms. The political sentiments that the Exposition celebrated were not such as to find general sympathy in monarchical Europe, so that the "crowned heads" were conspicuous by their absence. It was not, of course, by way of theatrical antithesis that Edison appeared in Paris at such a time. But the contrast was none the less striking and effective. It was felt that, after all, that which the great exposition exemplified at its best—the triumph of genius over matter, over ignorance, over superstition—met with its due recognition when Edison came to participate, and to felicitate a noble nation that could show so much in the victories of civilization and the arts, despite its long trials and its long struggle for liberty. It is no exaggeration to say that Edison was greeted with the enthusiastic homage of the whole French people. They could find no praise warm enough for the man who had "organized the echoes" and "tamed the lightning," and whose career was so picturesque with eventful and romantic development. In fact, for weeks together it seemed as though no Parisian paper was considered complete and up to date without an article on Edison. The exuberant wit and fancy of the feuilletonists seized upon his various inventions evolving from them others of the most extraordinary nature with which to bedazzle and bewilder the reader. At the close of the Exposition Edison was created a Commander of the Legion of Honor. His own exhibit, made at a personal expense of over $100,000, covered several thousand square feet in the vast Machinery Hall, and was centred around a huge Edison lamp built of myriads of smaller lamps of the ordinary size. The great attraction, however, was the display of the perfected phonograph. Several instruments were provided, and every day, all day long, while the Exposition lasted, queues of eager visitors from every quarter of the globe were waiting to hear the little machine talk and sing and reproduce their own voices. Never before was such a collection of the languages of the world made. It was the first linguistic concourse since Babel times. We must let Edison tell the story of some of his experiences:
A very interesting time socially was when Edison and his family visited Europe in 1889. He showcased his amazing inventions and equipment at the grand Paris Centennial Exposition, which delighted the French, who welcomed him wholeheartedly. The political sentiments celebrated at the Exposition didn't find much sympathy in monarchical Europe, resulting in the absence of many "crowned heads." Edison’s appearance in Paris during such a time wasn’t a theatrical statement, but the contrast was still striking and impactful. It was clear that the Exposition, showcasing the triumph of genius over matter, ignorance, and superstition, received its deserved recognition with Edison’s participation as he celebrated with a nation that displayed so much in its victories of civilization and the arts, despite its long struggles for freedom. It’s no exaggeration to say that Edison received enthusiastic recognition from the entire French people. They couldn’t find enough praise for the man who had "organized the echoes" and "tamed the lightning," whose career was filled with dramatic and romantic developments. For weeks, it seemed no Parisian newspaper was considered complete without a feature on Edison. The lively wit and creativity of the feuilletonists used his various inventions to create others that amazed and dazzled readers. At the end of the Exposition, Edison was made a Commander of the Legion of Honor. His exhibit, which he funded personally with over $100,000, covered several thousand square feet in the vast Machinery Hall and centered around a massive Edison lamp made of thousands of smaller lamps. However, the highlight was the display of the perfected phonograph. Several instruments were set up, and every day, eager visitors from all over the world lined up to hear the little machine talk, sing, and replicate their own voices. It was the largest collection of world languages ever assembled—like the first linguistic gathering since Babel. We should let Edison share some of his experiences:
"At the Universal Exposition at Paris, in 1889, I made a personal exhibit covering about an acre. As I had no intention of offering to sell anything I was showing, and was pushing no companies, the whole exhibition was made for honor, and without any hope of profit. But the Paris newspapers came around and wanted pay for notices of it, which we promptly refused; whereupon there was rather a stormy time for a while, but nothing was published about it.
"At the Universal Exposition in Paris in 1889, I set up a personal exhibit that covered about an acre. Since I wasn’t planning to sell anything I was showcasing and wasn’t promoting any companies, the entire exhibition was created for the sake of honor, without any expectation of profit. However, the Paris newspapers approached us, wanting payment in exchange for coverage, which we quickly declined; this led to a bit of a tumultuous period for a while, but nothing was published about it."
"While at the Exposition I visited the Opera-House. The President of France lent me his private box. The Opera-House was one of the first to be lighted by the incandescent lamp, and the managers took great pleasure in showing me down through the labyrinth containing the wiring, dynamos, etc. When I came into the box, the orchestra played the 'Star-Spangled Banner,' and all the people in the house arose; whereupon I was very much embarrassed. After I had been an hour at the play, the manager came around and asked me to go underneath the stage, as they were putting on a ballet of 300 girls, the finest ballet in Europe. It seems there is a little hole on the stage with a hood over it, in which the prompter sits when opera is given. In this instance it was not occupied, and I was given the position in the prompter's seat, and saw the whole ballet at close range.
"While at the Exposition, I visited the Opera House. The President of France lent me his private box. The Opera House was one of the first to be illuminated by incandescent lamps, and the managers took great pleasure in showing me through the maze that held the wiring, dynamos, and so on. When I entered the box, the orchestra played the 'Star-Spangled Banner,' and everyone in the house stood up, which made me really embarrassed. After watching the play for an hour, the manager came over and asked me to go behind the stage because they were presenting a ballet with 300 girls, the finest ballet in Europe. There’s a small hole on the stage with a hood over it where the prompter sits during an opera performance. In this case, it was unoccupied, and I was given the prompter’s seat and got to see the entire ballet up close."
"The city of Paris gave me a dinner at the new Hotel de Ville, which was also lighted with the Edison system. They had a very fine installation of machinery. As I could not understand or speak a word of French, I went to see our minister, Mr. Whitelaw Reid, and got him to send a deputy to answer for me, which he did, with my grateful thanks. Then the telephone company gave me a dinner, and the engineers of France; and I attended the dinner celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of photography. Then they sent to Reid my decoration, and they tried to put a sash on me, but I could not stand for that. My wife had me wear the little red button, but when I saw Americans coming I would slip it out of my lapel, as I thought they would jolly me for wearing it."
"The city of Paris hosted a dinner for me at the new City Hall, which was also lit up with the Edison system. They had a really impressive installation of machinery. Since I couldn't understand or speak a word of French, I went to see our minister, Mr. Whitelaw Reid, and he kindly sent a deputy to speak on my behalf, for which I was very grateful. Then the telephone company threw me a dinner, along with the engineers of France; I also attended a dinner celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of photography. After that, they sent my decoration to Reid, and they tried to put a sash on me, but I couldn't go along with that. My wife had me wear the little red button, but whenever I saw Americans coming, I'd slip it out of my lapel, thinking they would tease me for wearing it."
Nor was this all. Edison naturally met many of the celebrities of France: "I visited the Eiffel Tower at the invitation of Eiffel. We went to the top, where there was an extension and a small place in which was Eiffel's private office. In this was a piano. When my wife and I arrived at the top, we found that Gounod, the composer, was there. We stayed a couple of hours, and Gounod sang and played for us. We spent a day at Meudon, an old palace given by the government to Jansen, the astronomer. He occupied three rooms, and there were 300. He had the grand dining-room for his laboratory. He showed me a gyroscope he had got up which made the incredible number of 4000 revolutions in a second. A modification of this was afterward used on the French Atlantic lines for making an artificial horizon to take observations for position at sea. In connection with this a gentleman came to me a number of years afterward, and I got out a part of some plans for him. He wanted to make a gigantic gyroscope weighing several tons, to be run by an electric motor and put on a sailing ship. He wanted this gyroscope to keep a platform perfectly horizontal, no matter how rough the sea was. Upon this platform he was going to mount a telescope to observe an eclipse off the Gold Coast of Africa. But for some reason it was never completed.
This wasn’t all. Edison naturally met many of the celebrities of France: "I visited the Eiffel Tower at Eiffel's invitation. We went to the top, where there was an extension and a small area that housed Eiffel's private office. Inside was a piano. When my wife and I arrived at the top, we found that Gounod, the composer, was there. We stayed for a couple of hours, and Gounod sang and played for us. We spent a day at Meudon, an old palace given by the government to Jansen, the astronomer. He occupied three rooms out of the 300 available. He used the grand dining room as his laboratory. He showed me a gyroscope he had developed that made an unbelievable 4000 revolutions per second. A modified version of this was later used on the French Atlantic lines to create an artificial horizon for taking position observations at sea. Years later, a gentleman approached me about some plans, and I helped him with part of them. He wanted to build a massive gyroscope weighing several tons, powered by an electric motor, to be placed on a sailing ship. This gyroscope was meant to keep a platform perfectly horizontal, no matter how rough the sea got. He intended to mount a telescope on this platform to observe an eclipse off the Gold Coast of Africa. However, for some reason, it was never completed."
"Pasteur invited me to come down to the Institute, and I went and had quite a chat with him. I saw a large number of persons being inoculated, and also the whole modus operandi, which was very interesting. I saw one beautiful boy about ten, the son of an English lord. His father was with him. He had been bitten in the face, and was taking the treatment. I said to Pasteur, 'Will he live?' 'No,' said he, 'the boy will be dead in six days. He was bitten too near the top of the spinal column, and came too late!'"
"Pasteur invited me to come down to the Institute, so I went and had a long talk with him. I saw a lot of people getting inoculated, and I also witnessed the entire process, which was really fascinating. I saw a beautiful boy about ten years old, the son of an English lord. His father was there with him. He had been bitten on the face and was undergoing treatment. I asked Pasteur, 'Will he live?' 'No,' he replied, 'the boy will be dead in six days. He was bitten too close to the top of the spinal column and came in too late!'"
Edison has no opinion to offer as an expert on art, but has his own standard of taste: "Of course I visited the Louvre and saw the Old Masters, which I could not enjoy. And I attended the Luxembourg, with modern masters, which I enjoyed greatly. To my mind, the Old Masters are not art, and I suspect that many others are of the same opinion; and that their value is in their scarcity and in the variety of men with lots of money." Somewhat akin to this is a shrewd comment on one feature of the Exposition: "I spent several days in the Exposition at Paris. I remember going to the exhibit of the Kimberley diamond mines, and they kindly permitted me to take diamonds from some of the blue earth which they were washing by machinery to exhibit the mine operations. I found several beautiful diamonds, but they seemed a little light weight to me when I was picking them out. They were diamonds for exhibition purposes —probably glass."
Edison doesn’t have an expert opinion on art, but he has his own taste: "Of course, I visited the Louvre and saw the Old Masters, which I couldn’t appreciate. And I went to the Luxembourg, where I enjoyed the modern masters a lot. In my opinion, the Old Masters aren’t real art, and I think many others feel the same way; their value lies in their rarity and in the number of wealthy people who want them." A similar remark can be made about one aspect of the Exposition: "I spent several days at the Exposition in Paris. I remember visiting the Kimberley diamond mines exhibit, and they generously allowed me to take some diamonds from the blue earth they were washing by machine for display purposes. I found a few beautiful diamonds, but they felt a bit light when I was picking them out. They were probably just exhibition diamonds — most likely glass."
This did not altogether complete the European trip of 1889, for Edison wished to see Helmholtz. "After leaving Paris we went to Berlin. The French papers then came out and attacked me because I went to Germany; and said I was now going over to the enemy. I visited all the things of interest in Berlin; and then on my way home I went with Helmholtz and Siemens in a private compartment to the meeting of the German Association of Science at Heidelberg, and spent two days there. When I started from Berlin on the trip, I began to tell American stories. Siemens was very fond of these stories and would laugh immensely at them, and could see the points and the humor, by his imagination; but Helmholtz could not see one of them. Siemens would quickly, in German, explain the point, but Helmholtz could not see it, although he understood English, which Siemens could speak. Still the explanations were made in German. I always wished I could have understood Siemens's explanations of the points of those stories. At Heidelberg, my assistant, Mr. Wangemann, an accomplished German-American, showed the phonograph before the Association."
This didn't completely wrap up Edison's European trip in 1889 because he wanted to meet Helmholtz. "After leaving Paris, we headed to Berlin. The French newspapers came out and criticized me for going to Germany, claiming I was switching sides. I explored all the interesting sites in Berlin, and then on my way back, I traveled with Helmholtz and Siemens in a private compartment to the German Association of Science meeting in Heidelberg, where I spent two days. As I left Berlin, I started sharing American stories. Siemens enjoyed these stories and laughed heartily at them; he could see the humor and the points through his imagination, but Helmholtz didn't get any of them. Siemens would quickly explain the punchlines in German, but Helmholtz still couldn't see it, even though he understood English, which Siemens spoke. However, the explanations were in German. I always wished I could have understood Siemens's explanations of those story points. In Heidelberg, my assistant, Mr. Wangemann, a skilled German-American, demonstrated the phonograph to the Association."
Then came the trip from the Continent to England, of which this will certainly pass as a graphic picture: "When I crossed over to England I had heard a good deal about the terrors of the English Channel as regards seasickness. I had been over the ocean three times and did not know what seasickness was, so far as I was concerned myself. I was told that while a man might not get seasick on the ocean, if he met a good storm on the Channel it would do for him. When we arrived at Calais to cross over, everybody made for the restaurant. I did not care about eating, and did not go to the restaurant, but my family did. I walked out and tried to find the boat. Going along the dock I saw two small smokestacks sticking up, and looking down saw a little boat. 'Where is the steamer that goes across the Channel?' 'This is the boat.' There had been a storm in the North Sea that had carried away some of the boats on the German steamer, and it certainly looked awful tough outside. I said to the man: 'Will that boat live in that sea?' 'Oh yes,' he said, 'but we've had a bad storm.' So I made up my mind that perhaps I would get sick this time. The managing director of the English railroad owning this line was Forbes, who heard I was coming over, and placed the private saloon at my disposal. The moment my family got in the room with the French lady's maid and the rest, they commenced to get sick, so I felt pretty sure I was in for it. We started out of the little inlet and got into the Channel, and that boat went in seventeen directions simultaneously. I waited awhile to see what was going to occur, and then went into the smoking-compartment. Nobody was there. By-and-by the fun began. Sounds of all kinds and varieties were heard in every direction. They were all sick. There must have been 100 people aboard. I didn't see a single exception except the waiters and myself. I asked one of the waiters concerning the boat itself, and was taken to see the engineer, and went down to look at the engines, and saw the captain. But I kept mostly in the smoking-room. I was smoking a big cigar, and when a man looked in I would give a big puff, and every time they saw that they would go away and begin again. The English Channel is a holy terror, all right, but it didn't affect me. I must be out of balance."
Then came the trip from the Continent to England, which I can definitely describe in detail: "When I crossed over to England, I had heard a lot about how terrifying the English Channel could be in terms of seasickness. I had traveled across the ocean three times and never experienced seasickness myself. I was told that while someone might not get seasick on the ocean, a good storm on the Channel would change that. When we arrived in Calais to make the crossing, everyone headed straight for the restaurant. I wasn't in the mood to eat, so I skipped it while my family went in. I walked out to find the boat. As I walked along the dock, I spotted two small smokestacks popping up and saw a little boat below. 'Where’s the steamer that goes across the Channel?' I asked. 'This is the boat,' came the reply. There had been a storm in the North Sea that had damaged some of the boats on the German steamer, and the outside looked really rough. I asked the man, 'Will that boat handle this sea?' 'Oh yes,' he said, 'but we've had a bad storm.' I figured I might get sick this time. The managing director of the English railroad that owned this line was Forbes, who had heard I was coming and offered me the private saloon. The moment my family entered the room with the French lady's maid and the others, they all started to feel sick, so I was pretty sure I was in for it too. We left the little inlet and hit the Channel, and that boat was all over the place. I waited for a bit to see what would happen, then went to the smoking compartment. It was empty. Eventually, the chaos began. Sounds of every kind echoed around, and everyone was sick. There must have been about 100 people on board. I didn’t see anyone who wasn’t ill except the waiters and myself. I asked one of the waiters about the boat and was taken to see the engineer, where I looked at the engines and met the captain. But mostly, I stayed in the smoking room. I was smoking a big cigar, and whenever someone peeked in, I would take a big puff. Each time they saw that, they would leave and start over. The English Channel is definitely no joke, but it didn’t bother me. I must be immune."
While in Paris, Edison had met Sir John Pender, the English "cable king," and had received an invitation from him to make a visit to his country residence: "Sir John Pender, the master of the cable system of the world at that time, I met in Paris. I think he must have lived among a lot of people who were very solemn, because I went out riding with him in the Bois de Boulogne and started in to tell him American stories. Although he was a Scotchman he laughed immoderately. He had the faculty of understanding and quickly seeing the point of the stories; and for three days after I could not get rid of him. Finally I made him a promise that I would go to his country house at Foot's Cray, near London. So I went there, and spent two or three days telling him stories.
While in Paris, Edison met Sir John Pender, the English "cable king," and got an invitation from him to visit his country house: "I met Sir John Pender, the master of the world's cable system at that time, in Paris. I think he must have been around a lot of serious people because when I went riding with him in the Bois de Boulogne and started sharing American stories, he laughed constantly. Even though he was a Scotsman, he had a talent for understanding and quickly grasping the punchlines; and for three days afterward, I couldn't shake him off. Eventually, I promised him I would visit his country house at Foot's Cray, near London. So I went there and spent two or three days telling him stories."
"While at Foot's Cray, I met some of the backers of Ferranti, then putting up a gigantic alternating-current dynamo near London to send ten or fifteen thousand volts up into the main district of the city for electric lighting. I think Pender was interested. At any rate the people invited to dinner were very much interested, and they questioned me as to what I thought of the proposition. I said I hadn't any thought about it, and could not give any opinion until I saw it. So I was taken up to London to see the dynamo in course of construction and the methods employed; and they insisted I should give them some expression of my views. While I gave them my opinion, it was reluctantly; I did not want to do so. I thought that commercially the thing was too ambitious, that Ferranti's ideas were too big, just then; that he ought to have started a little smaller until he was sure. I understand that this installation was not commercially successful, as there were a great many troubles. But Ferranti had good ideas, and he was no small man."
"While at Foot's Cray, I met some of the investors backing Ferranti, who was setting up a massive alternating-current dynamo near London to send ten or fifteen thousand volts into the main district of the city for electric lighting. I think Pender was interested. At any rate, the people invited to dinner were very intrigued, and they asked me what I thought about the proposal. I said I didn't have an opinion yet and couldn't give one until I saw it. So, they took me to London to see the dynamo being built and the methods they were using; they insisted I share my thoughts. While I gave them my opinion, I did so reluctantly; I didn’t want to. I felt that, in business terms, it was too ambitious, that Ferranti’s ideas were too grand at that moment; he should have started a bit smaller until he was more certain. I understand that this installation wasn’t commercially successful, as there were many issues. But Ferranti had solid ideas, and he was a significant figure."
Incidentally it may be noted here that during the same year (1889) the various manufacturing Edison lighting interests in America were brought together, under the leadership of Mr. Henry Villard, and consolidated in the Edison General Electric Company with a capital of no less than $12,000,000 on an eight-per-cent.-dividend basis. The numerous Edison central stations all over the country represented much more than that sum, and made a splendid outlet for the product of the factories. A few years later came the consolidation with the Thomson-Houston interests in the General Electric Company, which under the brilliant and vigorous management of President C. A. Coffin has become one of the greatest manufacturing institutions of the country, with an output of apparatus reaching toward $75,000,000 annually. The net result of both financial operations was, however, to detach Edison from the special field of invention to which he had given so many of his most fruitful years; and to close very definitely that chapter of his life, leaving him free to develop other ideas and interests as set forth in these volumes.
It’s worth mentioning that in the same year (1889), the various manufacturing interests of Edison lighting in America were brought together under Mr. Henry Villard and merged into the Edison General Electric Company, which had a capital of at least $12,000,000, based on an eight-percent dividend. The many Edison central stations throughout the country represented much more than that amount and served as an excellent outlet for the factories' products. A few years later, the company merged with the Thomson-Houston interests to form the General Electric Company, which under the dynamic leadership of President C. A. Coffin has become one of the biggest manufacturing institutions in the country, with an annual output of nearly $75,000,000. However, the outcome of both financial moves was to separate Edison from the specific area of invention that had consumed many of his most productive years, effectively closing that chapter of his life and allowing him to pursue other ideas and interests as detailed in these volumes.
It might appear strange on the surface, but one of the reasons that most influenced Edison to regrets in connection with the "big trade" of 1889 was that it separated him from his old friend and ally, Bergmann, who, on selling out, saw a great future for himself in Germany, went there, and realized it. Edison has always had an amused admiration for Bergmann, and his "social side" is often made evident by his love of telling stories about those days of struggle. Some of the stories were told for this volume. "Bergmann came to work for me as a boy," says Edison. "He started in on stock-quotation printers. As he was a rapid workman and paid no attention to the clock, I took a fancy to him, and gave him piece-work. He contrived so many little tools to cheapen the work that he made lots of money. I even helped him get up tools until it occurred to me that this was too rapid a process of getting rid of my money, as I hadn't the heart to cut the price when it was originally fair. After a year or so, Bergmann got enough money to start a small shop in Wooster Street, New York, and it was at this shop that the first phonographs were made for sale. Then came the carbon telephone transmitter, a large number of which were made by Bergmann for the Western Union. Finally came the electric light. A dynamo was installed in Bergmann's shop to permit him to test the various small devices which he was then making for the system. He rented power from a Jew who owned the building. Power was supplied from a fifty-horse-power engine to other tenants on the several floors. Soon after the introduction of the big dynamo machine, the landlord appeared in the shop and insisted that Bergmann was using more power than he was paying for, and said that lately the belt on the engine was slipping and squealing. Bergmann maintained that he must be mistaken. The landlord kept going among his tenants and finally discovered the dynamo. 'Oh! Mr. Bergmann, now I know where my power goes to,' pointing to the dynamo. Bergmann gave him a withering look of scorn, and said, 'Come here and I will show you.' Throwing off the belt and disconnecting the wires, he spun the armature around by hand. 'There,' said Bergmann, 'you see it's not here that you must look for your loss.' This satisfied the landlord, and he started off to his other tenants. He did not know that that machine, when the wires were connected, could stop his engine.
It might seem odd at first, but one of the main reasons Edison regretted the "big trade" of 1889 was that it cut him off from his old friend and partner, Bergmann. After selling out, Bergmann saw a bright future for himself in Germany, moved there, and achieved it. Edison always had a fond admiration for Bergmann, and his "social side" comes through in his enjoyment of sharing stories about their struggle together. Some of those stories were included in this volume. "Bergmann came to work for me as a boy," Edison says. "He started with stock-quotation printers. Because he worked quickly and didn’t pay attention to the clock, I took a liking to him and gave him piece-work. He created so many little tools to make the work easier that he earned a lot of money. I even helped him design tools until I realized that I was getting rid of my money too quickly since I didn’t have the heart to lower the original fair price. After about a year, Bergmann made enough money to open a small shop on Wooster Street in New York, and it was there that the first phonographs were produced for sale. Then came the carbon telephone transmitter, which Bergmann produced in large quantities for Western Union. Finally, the electric light happened. They installed a dynamo in Bergmann's shop for him to test the various small devices he was working on for the system. He rented power from a man who owned the building. Power was supplied from a fifty-horsepower engine to other tenants on the different floors. Shortly after the big dynamo was introduced, the landlord showed up in the shop and insisted Bergmann was using more power than he was paying for, mentioning that recently the belt on the engine had been slipping and making noise. Bergmann argued that the landlord must be mistaken. The landlord kept checking with his tenants and eventually discovered the dynamo. 'Oh! Mr. Bergmann, now I know where my power is going,' he said, pointing at the dynamo. Bergmann gave him a disdainful look and said, 'Come here, and I'll show you.' He disconnected the belt and wires and spun the armature by hand. 'There,' Bergmann said, 'you can see it’s not here that you should be looking for your loss.' This satisfied the landlord, who went off to check on his other tenants. He didn’t realize that when the wires were connected, that machine could actually stop his engine.
"Soon after, the business had grown so large that E. H. Johnson and I went in as partners, and Bergmann rented an immense factory building at the corner of Avenue B and East Seventeenth Street, New York, six stories high and covering a quarter of a block. Here were made all the small things used on the electric-lighting system, such as sockets, chandeliers, switches, meters, etc. In addition, stock tickers, telephones, telephone switchboards, and typewriters were made the Hammond typewriters were perfected and made there. Over 1500 men were finally employed. This shop was very successful both scientifically and financially. Bergmann was a man of great executive ability and carried economy of manufacture to the limit. Among all the men I have had associated with me, he had the commercial instinct most highly developed."
"Soon after, the business had grown so large that E. H. Johnson and I became partners, and Bergmann rented a huge factory building at the corner of Avenue B and East Seventeenth Street in New York, six stories tall and covering a quarter of a block. Here, we produced all the small components used in the electric lighting system, like sockets, chandeliers, switches, meters, and more. Additionally, we made stock tickers, telephones, telephone switchboards, and typewriters—the Hammond typewriters were developed and manufactured there. Eventually, over 1500 men were employed. This shop was very successful both scientifically and financially. Bergmann was a man with impressive executive skills and pushed manufacturing efficiency to its limits. Of all the people I’ve worked with, he had the most highly developed commercial instinct."
One need not wonder at Edison's reminiscent remark that, "In any trade any of my 'boys' made with Bergmann he always got the best of them, no matter what it was. One time there was to be a convention of the managers of Edison illuminating companies at Chicago. There were a lot of representatives from the East, and a private car was hired. At Jersey City a poker game was started by one of the delegates. Bergmann was induced to enter the game. This was played right through to Chicago without any sleep, but the boys didn't mind that. I had gotten them immune to it. Bergmann had won all the money, and when the porter came in and said 'Chicago,' Bergmann jumped up and said: 'What! Chicago! I thought it was only Philadelphia!'"
One doesn't need to be surprised by Edison's nostalgic comment that, "In any trade, any of my 'guys' dealt with Bergmann, he always came out on top, no matter what it was. One time, there was a convention for the managers of Edison lighting companies in Chicago. A lot of representatives from the East showed up, and we hired a private car. At Jersey City, one of the delegates started a poker game. Bergmann was persuaded to join in. They played the whole way to Chicago without any sleep, but the guys didn’t mind that. I had trained them to handle it. Bergmann had won all the money, and when the porter came in and said 'Chicago,' Bergmann jumped up and said: 'What! Chicago! I thought it was only Philadelphia!'"
But perhaps this further story is a better indication of developed humor and shrewdness: "A man by the name of Epstein had been in the habit of buying brass chips and trimmings from the lathes, and in some way Bergmann found out that he had been cheated. This hurt his pride, and he determined to get even. One day Epstein appeared and said: 'Good-morning, Mr. Bergmann, have you any chips to-day?' 'No,' said Bergmann, 'I have none.' 'That's strange, Mr. Bergmann; won't you look?' No, he wouldn't look; he knew he had none. Finally Epstein was so persistent that Bergmann called an assistant and told him to go and see if he had any chips. He returned and said they had the largest and finest lot they ever had. Epstein went up to several boxes piled full of chips, and so heavy that he could not lift even one end of a box. 'Now, Mr. Bergmann,' said Epstein, 'how much for the lot?' 'Epstein,' said Bergmann, 'you have cheated me, and I will no longer sell by the lot, but will sell only by the pound.' No amount of argument would apparently change Bergmann's determination to sell by the pound, but finally Epstein got up to $250 for the lot, and Bergmann, appearing as if disgusted, accepted and made him count out the money. Then he said: 'Well, Epstein, good-bye, I've got to go down to Wall Street.' Epstein and his assistant then attempted to lift the boxes to carry them out, but couldn't; and then discovered that calculations as to quantity had been thrown out because the boxes had all been screwed down to the floor and mostly filled with boards with a veneer of brass chips. He made such a scene that he had to be removed by the police. I met him several days afterward and he said he had forgiven Mr. Bergmann, as he was such a smart business man, and the scheme was so ingenious.
But perhaps this next story better showcases developed humor and cleverness: "A man named Epstein regularly bought brass chips and trimmings from the lathes, and somehow, Bergmann found out he had been cheated. This hurt his pride, so he decided to get back at him. One day, Epstein showed up and asked, 'Good morning, Mr. Bergmann, do you have any chips today?' 'No,' Bergmann replied, 'I don't have any.' 'That's strange, Mr. Bergmann; won't you check?' No, he wouldn't check; he knew he had none. Eventually, Epstein kept pushing, so Bergmann called an assistant and asked him to see if there were any chips. He came back saying they had the largest and finest lot they'd ever had. Epstein approached several boxes piled high with chips, so heavy that he couldn't lift even one end. 'Now, Mr. Bergmann,' Epstein said, 'how much for the lot?' 'Epstein,' Bergmann replied, 'you have cheated me, and from now on, I will sell by the pound, not by the lot.' No amount of arguing could change Bergmann’s mind about selling by the pound, but eventually, Epstein offered $250 for the lot, and Bergmann, pretending to be disgusted, accepted and made him count out the money. Then he said, 'Well, Epstein, goodbye, I've got to head down to Wall Street.' Epstein and his assistant then tried to lift the boxes to carry them out, but they couldn’t; they soon realized they had miscalculated the quantity because the boxes were all screwed down to the floor and mostly filled with boards with just a veneer of brass chips. He made such a scene that the police had to remove him. I ran into him several days later, and he said he had forgiven Mr. Bergmann since he was such a smart businessman, and the scheme was quite ingenious."
"One day as a joke I filled three or four sheets of foolscap paper with a jumble of figures and told Bergmann they were calculations showing the great loss of power from blowing the factory whistle. Bergmann thought it real, and never after that would he permit the whistle to blow."
"One day as a joke, I filled three or four sheets of big paper with a jumble of numbers and told Bergmann they were calculations showing the huge loss of power from blowing the factory whistle. Bergmann believed it was real, and after that, he never allowed the whistle to blow."
Another glimpse of the "social side" is afforded in the following little series of pen-pictures of the same place and time: "I had my laboratory at the top of the Bergmann works, after moving from Menlo Park. The building was six stories high. My father came there when he was eighty years of age. The old man had powerful lungs. In fact, when I was examined by the Mutual Life Insurance Company, in 1873, my lung expansion was taken by the doctor, and the old gentleman was there at the time. He said to the doctor: 'I wish you would take my lung expansion, too.' The doctor took it, and his surprise was very great, as it was one of the largest on record. I think it was five and one-half inches. There were only three or four could beat it. Little Bergmann hadn't much lung power. The old man said to him, one day: 'Let's run up-stairs.' Bergmann agreed and ran up. When they got there Bergmann was all done up, but my father never showed a sign of it. There was an elevator there, and each day while it was travelling up I held the stem of my Waterbury watch up against the column in the elevator shaft and it finished the winding by the time I got up the six stories." This original method of reducing the amount of physical labor involved in watch-winding brings to mind another instance of shrewdness mentioned by Edison, with regard to his newsboy days. Being asked whether he did not get imposed upon with bad bank-bills, he replied that he subscribed to a bank-note detector and consulted it closely whenever a note of any size fell into his hands. He was then less than fourteen years old.
Another look at the "social side" is provided in the following little series of snapshots of the same place and time: "I had my lab at the top of the Bergmann works, after moving from Menlo Park. The building was six stories tall. My father visited when he was eighty years old. The old man had strong lungs. In fact, when I was examined by the Mutual Life Insurance Company in 1873, the doctor measured my lung expansion, and my father was there at the time. He said to the doctor, 'I wish you would measure my lung expansion, too.' The doctor did, and he was very surprised because it was one of the largest on record. I think it was five and a half inches. Only three or four could beat it. Little Bergmann didn’t have much lung capacity. One day, the old man said to him, 'Let's run upstairs.' Bergmann agreed and ran up. When they got up there, Bergmann was completely winded, but my father didn’t show any signs of it. There was an elevator, and every day, while it was moving up, I held the stem of my Waterbury watch against the column in the elevator shaft, and it finished winding by the time I got up the six stories." This original method of reducing the amount of physical labor involved in winding the watch reminds me of another smart move mentioned by Edison regarding his days as a newsboy. When asked if he ever got stuck with fake banknotes, he replied that he subscribed to a banknote detector and consulted it closely whenever he received a note of any size. He was under fourteen years old at that time.
The conversations with Edison that elicited these stories brought out some details as to peril that attends experimentation. He has confronted many a serious physical risk, and counts himself lucky to have come through without a scratch or scar. Four instances of personal danger may be noted in his own language: "When I started at Menlo, I had an electric furnace for welding rare metals that I did not know about very clearly. I was in the dark-room, where I had a lot of chloride of sulphur, a very corrosive liquid. I did not know that it would decompose by water. I poured in a beakerful of water, and the whole thing exploded and threw a lot of it into my eyes. I ran to the hydrant, leaned over backward, opened my eyes, and ran the hydrant water right into them. But it was two weeks before I could see.
The conversations with Edison that sparked these stories revealed some details about the dangers of experimentation. He faced many serious physical risks and considers himself lucky to have come out unscathed. Four examples of personal danger can be noted in his own words: "When I started at Menlo, I had an electric furnace for welding rare metals that I didn’t know much about. I was in the dark room, where I had a lot of chloride of sulfur, a very corrosive liquid. I didn’t realize that it would break down with water. I poured in a beaker of water, and the whole thing exploded, splashing a lot of it into my eyes. I rushed to the hydrant, leaned back, opened my eyes, and let the hydrant water flow directly into them. It took two weeks before I could see again."
"The next time we just saved ourselves. I was making some stuff to squirt into filaments for the incandescent lamp. I made about a pound of it. I had used ammonia and bromine. I did not know it at the time, but I had made bromide of nitrogen. I put the large bulk of it in three filters, and after it had been washed and all the water had come through the filter, I opened the three filters and laid them on a hot steam plate to dry with the stuff. While I and Mr. Sadler, one of my assistants, were working near it, there was a sudden flash of light, and a very smart explosion. I said to Sadler: 'What is that?' 'I don't know,' he said, and we paid no attention. In about half a minute there was a sharp concussion, and Sadler said: 'See, it is that stuff on the steam plate.' I grabbed the whole thing and threw it in the sink, and poured water on it. I saved a little of it and found it was a terrific explosive. The reason why those little preliminary explosions took place was that a little had spattered out on the edge of the filter paper, and had dried first and exploded. Had the main body exploded there would have been nothing left of the laboratory I was working in.
The next time we really saved ourselves. I was making some stuff to squirt into filaments for the incandescent lamp. I made about a pound of it. I had used ammonia and bromine. I didn't know it at the time, but I had created nitrogen bromide. I put most of it in three filters, and after it was washed and all the water had passed through the filter, I opened the three filters and placed them on a hot steam plate to dry with the material. While Mr. Sadler, one of my assistants, and I were working nearby, there was a sudden flash of light and a loud explosion. I said to Sadler, "What was that?" "I don’t know," he replied, and we ignored it. About half a minute later, there was a sharp jolt, and Sadler said, "Look, it's that stuff on the steam plate." I grabbed the whole thing and tossed it in the sink, pouring water on it. I kept a little of it and discovered it was an incredibly powerful explosive. The small preliminary explosions happened because some had splattered out on the edge of the filter paper, dried first, and then exploded. If the main batch had exploded, there would have been nothing left of the lab I was working in.
"At another time, I had a briquetting machine for briquetting iron ore. I had a lever held down by a powerful spring, and a rod one inch in diameter and four feet long. While I was experimenting with it, and standing beside it, a washer broke, and that spring threw the rod right up to the ceiling with a blast; and it came down again just within an inch of my nose, and went clear through a two-inch plank. That was 'within an inch of your life,' as they say.
"At one point, I owned a briquetting machine for compressing iron ore. It had a lever that was held down by a strong spring, and a rod that was one inch in diameter and four feet long. While I was testing it and standing next to it, a washer snapped, and that spring shot the rod straight up to the ceiling with force; it then came back down just an inch from my face and went right through a two-inch thick plank. That was 'within an inch of your life,' as they say."
"In my experimental plant for concentrating iron ore in the northern part of New Jersey, we had a vertical drier, a column about nine feet square and eighty feet high. At the bottom there was a space where two men could go through a hole; and then all the rest of the column was filled with baffle plates. One day this drier got blocked, and the ore would not run down. So I and the vice-president of the company, Mr. Mallory, crowded through the manhole to see why the ore would not come down. After we got in, the ore did come down and there were fourteen tons of it above us. The men outside knew we were in there, and they had a great time digging us out and getting air to us."
"In my test facility for concentrating iron ore in northern New Jersey, we had a vertical dryer that was about nine feet wide and eighty feet tall. At the bottom, there was an opening big enough for two men to squeeze through, and the rest of the column was packed with baffle plates. One day, this dryer got jammed, and the ore wouldn’t flow down. So, I and the company’s vice president, Mr. Mallory, crawled through the manhole to figure out why the ore wouldn’t move. Once we got inside, the ore started to flow down, and there were fourteen tons of it above us. The workers outside knew we were stuck in there, and they had quite the adventure digging us out and getting us some fresh air."
Such incidents brought out in narration the fact that many of the men working with him had been less fortunate, particularly those who had experimented with the Roentgen X-ray, whose ravages, like those of leprosy, were responsible for the mutilation and death of at least one expert assistant. In the early days of work on the incandescent lamp, also, there was considerable trouble with mercury. "I had a series of vacuum-pumps worked by mercury and used for exhausting experimental incandescent lamps. The main pipe, which was full of mercury, was about seven and one-half feet from the floor. Along the length of the pipe were outlets to which thick rubber tubing was connected, each tube to a pump. One day, while experimenting with the mercury pump, my assistant, an awkward country lad from a farm on Staten Island, who had adenoids in his nose and breathed through his mouth, which was always wide open, was looking up at this pipe, at a small leak of mercury, when the rubber tube came off and probably two pounds of mercury went into his mouth and down his throat, and got through his system somehow. In a short time he became salivated, and his teeth got loose. He went home, and shortly his mother appeared at the laboratory with a horsewhip, which she proposed to use on the proprietor. I was fortunately absent, and she was mollified somehow by my other assistants. I had given the boy considerable iodide of potassium to prevent salivation, but it did no good in this case.
Such incidents highlighted that many of the men working with him were less fortunate, especially those who had dealt with the X-ray, whose harmful effects, like those of leprosy, led to the mutilation and death of at least one expert assistant. In the early days of working on the incandescent lamp, there were also significant issues with mercury. "I had a series of mercury-powered vacuum pumps used for exhausting experimental incandescent lamps. The main pipe, which was filled with mercury, was about seven and a half feet from the floor. Along the length of the pipe were outlets connected to thick rubber tubing, each leading to a pump. One day, while testing the mercury pump, my assistant, a clumsy country boy from a farm on Staten Island who had adenoids and always breathed through his mouth, looked up at this pipe, at a small leak of mercury, when the rubber tube came off and about two pounds of mercury spilled into his mouth and down his throat, somehow getting through his system. Soon after, he started to salivate, and his teeth became loose. He went home, and before long, his mother showed up at the laboratory with a horsewhip, intending to use it on the owner. Luckily, I wasn't there, and my other assistants managed to calm her down. I had given the boy a significant amount of potassium iodide to prevent salivation, but it didn't help in this case."
"When the first lamp-works were started at Menlo Park, one of my experiments seemed to show that hot mercury gave a better vacuum in the lamp than cold mercury. I thereupon started to heat it. Soon all the men got salivated, and things looked serious; but I found that in the mirror factories, where mercury was used extensively, the French Government made the giving of iodide of potassium compulsory to prevent salivation. I carried out this idea, and made every man take a dose every day, but there was great opposition, and hot mercury was finally abandoned."
"When the first lamp factories opened at Menlo Park, one of my experiments suggested that hot mercury created a better vacuum in the lamp than cold mercury. So, I started heating it. Soon, all the workers started experiencing salivation, and things got serious; however, I learned that in the mirror factories, where mercury was widely used, the French Government required the administration of potassium iodide to prevent salivation. I implemented this idea and made sure every worker took a dose every day, but there was a lot of resistance, and we ultimately abandoned hot mercury."
It will have been gathered that Edison has owed his special immunity from "occupational diseases" not only to luck but to unusual powers of endurance, and a strong physique, inherited, no doubt, from his father. Mr. Mallory mentions a little fact that bears on this exceptional quality of bodily powers. "I have often been surprised at Edison's wonderful capacity for the instant visual perception of differences in materials that were invisible to others until he would patiently point them out. This had puzzled me for years, but one day I was unexpectedly let into part of the secret. For some little time past Mr. Edison had noticed that he was bothered somewhat in reading print, and I asked him to have an oculist give him reading-glasses. He partially promised, but never took time to attend to it. One day he and I were in the city, and as Mrs. Edison had spoken to me about it, and as we happened to have an hour to spare, I persuaded him to go to an oculist with me. Using no names, I asked the latter to examine the gentleman's eyes. He did so very conscientiously, and it was an interesting experience, for he was kept busy answering Mr. Edison's numerous questions. When the oculist finished, he turned to me and said: 'I have been many years in the business, but have never seen an optic nerve like that of this gentleman. An ordinary optic nerve is about the thickness of a thread, but his is like a cord. He must be a remarkable man in some walk of life. Who is he?'"
It’s clear that Edison’s unique immunity to "occupational diseases" is not just due to luck but also to his exceptional endurance and strong physique, something he likely inherited from his father. Mr. Mallory points out an interesting fact about this extraordinary physical ability. "I’ve often been amazed by Edison’s incredible ability to instantly see differences in materials that others couldn’t notice until he pointed them out. This puzzled me for years, but one day I got a glimpse into part of the secret. For a while, Edison had been having some trouble reading print, so I suggested he see an eye doctor for reading glasses. He sort of agreed but never made the time. One day, we were in the city, and since Mrs. Edison had mentioned it to me and we had an hour to kill, I convinced him to go to an eye doctor with me. Without mentioning any names, I asked the doctor to examine his eyes. The doctor was very thorough, which was fascinating because he was busy answering all of Mr. Edison’s many questions. When the exam was over, he turned to me and said: 'I’ve been in this field for many years, but I’ve never seen an optic nerve like this man’s. An ordinary optic nerve is about the thickness of a thread, but his is like a cord. He must be an extraordinary person in some profession. Who is he?'"
It has certainly required great bodily vigor and physical capacity to sustain such fatigue as Edison has all his life imposed upon himself, to the extent on one occasion of going five days without sleep. In a conversation during 1909, he remarked, as though it were nothing out of the way, that up to seven years previously his average of daily working hours was nineteen and one-half, but that since then he figured it at eighteen. He said he stood it easily, because he was interested in everything, and was reading and studying all the time. For instance, he had gone to bed the night before exactly at twelve and had arisen at 4.30 A. M. to read some New York law reports. It was suggested that the secret of it might be that he did not live in the past, but was always looking forward to a greater future, to which he replied: "Yes, that's it. I don't live with the past; I am living for to-day and to-morrow. I am interested in every department of science, arts, and manufacture. I read all the time on astronomy, chemistry, biology, physics, music, metaphysics, mechanics, and other branches—political economy, electricity, and, in fact, all things that are making for progress in the world. I get all the proceedings of the scientific societies, the principal scientific and trade journals, and read them. I also read The Clipper, The Police Gazette, The Billboard, The Dramatic Mirror, and a lot of similar publications, for I like to know what is going on. In this way I keep up to date, and live in a great moving world of my own, and, what's more, I enjoy every minute of it." Referring to some event of the past, he said: "Spilt milk doesn't interest me. I have spilt lots of it, and while I have always felt it for a few days, it is quickly forgotten, and I turn again to the future." During another talk on kindred affairs it was suggested to Edison that, as he had worked so hard all his life, it was about time for him to think somewhat of the pleasures of travel and the social side of life. To which he replied laughingly: "I already have a schedule worked out. From now until I am seventy-five years of age, I expect to keep more or less busy with my regular work, not, however, working as many hours or as hard as I have in the past. At seventy five I expect to wear loud waistcoats with fancy buttons; also gaiter tops; at eighty I expect to learn how to play bridge whist and talk foolishly to the ladies. At eighty-five I expect to wear a full-dress suit every evening at dinner, and at ninety—well, I never plan more than thirty years ahead."
It definitely takes a lot of physical strength and stamina to deal with the kind of exhaustion that Edison has put himself through his entire life, including one time when he went five days without sleep. In a conversation in 1909, he remarked casually that up until seven years earlier, he averaged about nineteen and a half hours of work each day, but since then he estimated it at eighteen. He claimed it was easy for him because he was interested in everything and was always reading and studying. For instance, he had gone to bed the night before at exactly midnight and got up at 4:30 A.M. to read some New York law reports. It was suggested that the secret might be that he didn’t dwell on the past and was always looking forward to a better future, to which he replied: "Yes, that’s it. I don’t live in the past; I’m living for today and tomorrow. I’m interested in every field of science, arts, and manufacturing. I read all the time about astronomy, chemistry, biology, physics, music, metaphysics, mechanics, and other areas—political economy, electricity, and pretty much everything that’s moving the world forward. I get all the proceedings from scientific societies, the major scientific and trade journals, and I read them. I also read The Clipper, The Police Gazette, The Billboard, The Dramatic Mirror, and a lot of similar magazines because I like to know what’s happening. This way, I stay up to date and live in this exciting world of my own, and what’s more, I enjoy every minute of it." When referring to something from the past, he said: "Spilled milk doesn’t interest me. I’ve spilled plenty of it, and while I feel it for a few days, it’s quickly forgotten, and I focus back on the future." In another conversation about similar topics, it was suggested to Edison that after working so hard all his life, he should think about the joys of travel and the social aspects of life. He laughed and replied: "I already have a plan. From now until I’m seventy-five, I expect to stay relatively busy with my regular work, but not working as many hours or as hard as I have in the past. At seventy-five, I plan to wear loud waistcoats with fancy buttons; also gaiter tops; at eighty, I plan to learn how to play bridge whist and chat foolishly with the ladies. At eighty-five, I expect to wear a formal suit every evening for dinner, and at ninety—well, I never plan more than thirty years ahead."
The reference to clothes is interesting, as it is one of the few subjects in which Edison has no interest. It rather bores him. His dress is always of the plainest; in fact, so plain that, at the Bergmann shops in New York, the children attending a parochial Catholic school were wont to salute him with the finger to the head, every time he went by. Upon inquiring, he found that they took him for a priest, with his dark garb, smooth-shaven face, and serious expression. Edison says: "I get a suit that fits me; then I compel the tailors to use that as a jig or pattern or blue-print to make others by. For many years a suit was used as a measurement; once or twice they took fresh measurements, but these didn't fit and they had to go back. I eat to keep my weight constant, hence I need never change measurements." In regard to this, Mr. Mallory furnishes a bit of chat as follows: "In a lawsuit in which I was a witness, I went out to lunch with the lawyers on both sides, and the lawyer who had been cross-examining me stated that he had for a client a Fifth Avenue tailor, who had told him that he had made all of Mr. Edison's clothes for the last twenty years, and that he had never seen him. He said that some twenty years ago a suit was sent to him from Orange, and measurements were made from it, and that every suit since had been made from these measurements. I may add, from my own personal observation, that in Mr. Edison's clothes there is no evidence but that every new suit that he has worn in that time looks as if he had been specially measured for it, which shows how very little he has changed physically in the last twenty years."
The mention of clothing is interesting because it's one of the few subjects that Edison doesn't care about. It actually bores him. He always dresses very simply; in fact, his style is so plain that at the Bergmann shops in New York, kids from a local Catholic school used to salute him with a finger to their heads every time he walked by. When he asked why, he learned they mistook him for a priest because of his dark clothing, clean-shaven face, and serious look. Edison says, "I get a suit that fits me; then I make the tailors use that as a template or blueprint to create others. For many years, one suit was used as a standard; they took new measurements a few times, but those didn't fit, so they had to go back. I manage my weight by controlling my diet, so I never have to change measurements." In this regard, Mr. Mallory adds a bit of chat: "In a lawsuit where I was a witness, I went out for lunch with lawyers from both sides, and the lawyer who had been cross-examining me mentioned he had a client who was a Fifth Avenue tailor. He said that he had made all of Mr. Edison’s clothes for the past twenty years and had never met him. He mentioned that about twenty years ago, a suit was sent to him from Orange, and measurements were taken from it; every suit since has been made from those measurements. I can also say, based on my own observations, that every new suit Mr. Edison has worn during that time looks like it was custom-made for him, which indicates how little he has changed physically in the last twenty years."
Edison has never had any taste for amusements, although he will indulge in the game of "Parchesi" and has a billiard-table in his house. The coming of the automobile was a great boon to him, because it gave him a form of outdoor sport in which he could indulge in a spirit of observation, without the guilty feeling that he was wasting valuable time. In his automobile he has made long tours, and with his family has particularly indulged his taste for botany. That he has had the usual experience in running machines will be evidenced by the following little story from Mr. Mallory: "About three years ago I had a motor-car of a make of which Mr. Edison had already two cars; and when the car was received I made inquiry as to whether any repair parts were carried by any of the various garages in Easton, Pennsylvania, near our cement works. I learned that this particular car was the only one in Easton. Knowing that Mr. Edison had had an experience lasting two or three years with this particular make of car, I determined to ask him for information relative to repair parts; so the next time I was at the laboratory I told him I was unable to get any repair parts in Easton, and that I wished to order some of the most necessary, so that, in case of breakdowns, I would not be compelled to lose the use of the car for several days until the parts came from the automobile factory. I asked his advice as to what I should order, to which he replied: 'I don't think it will be necessary to order an extra top.'" Since that episode, which will probably be appreciated by most automobilists, Edison has taken up the electric automobile, and is now using it as well as developing it. One of the cars equipped with his battery is the Bailey, and Mr. Bee tells the following story in regard to it: "One day Colonel Bailey, of Amesbury, Massachusetts, who was visiting the Automobile Show in New York, came out to the laboratory to see Mr. Edison, as the latter had expressed a desire to talk with him on his next visit to the metropolis. When he arrived at the laboratory, Mr. Edison, who had been up all night experimenting, was asleep on the cot in the library. As a rule we never wake Mr. Edison from sleep, but as he wanted to see Colonel Bailey, who had to go, I felt that an exception should be made, so I went and tapped him on the shoulder. He awoke at once, smiling, jumped up, was instantly himself as usual, and advanced and greeted the visitor. His very first question was: 'Well, Colonel, how did you come out on that experiment?'—referring to some suggestions he had made at their last meeting a year before. For a minute Colonel Bailey did not recall what was referred to; but a few words from Mr. Edison brought it back to his remembrance, and he reported that the results had justified Mr. Edison's expectations."
Edison has never really enjoyed pastimes, although he does play "Parchesi" and has a billiard table at home. The arrival of the automobile was a huge advantage for him because it allowed him to engage in outdoor activity while observing the world around him, without feeling guilty about wasting time. He has taken long trips in his car, and he particularly enjoys exploring botany with his family. His experiences with operating cars are evidenced by this little story from Mr. Mallory: "About three years ago, I got a motorcar of a brand that Mr. Edison already owned two of. When it arrived, I asked around to see if any repair parts were available at the various garages in Easton, Pennsylvania, near our cement plant. I discovered that this specific model was the only one in Easton. Knowing that Mr. Edison had used this model for two or three years, I decided to ask him about getting repair parts; so the next time I was at the lab, I told him I couldn’t find any repair parts in Easton and wanted to order some essentials, so I wouldn’t be without the car for several days if something broke down waiting for parts to arrive from the factory. I asked for his advice on what I should order, and he replied: 'I don’t think you’ll need to order an extra top.'" Since that incident, which most car owners will understand, Edison has switched to electric cars and is actively using and developing them. One of the cars powered by his battery is the Bailey, and Mr. Bee recounts this story about it: "One day, Colonel Bailey from Amesbury, Massachusetts, visited the Automobile Show in New York and came to the lab to meet Mr. Edison, who had expressed interest in talking with him during his next trip to the city. When he got to the lab, Mr. Edison, who had been up all night experimenting, was asleep on a cot in the library. Generally, we don’t wake him when he’s sleeping, but since Colonel Bailey needed to leave, I thought it was necessary to make an exception, so I went and gently tapped his shoulder. He woke up immediately, smiling, jumped up, and was instantly back to his usual self, stepping forward to greet the visitor. His very first question was: 'Well, Colonel, how did that experiment turn out?'—referring to some suggestions he’d made during their last meeting a year earlier. For a moment, Colonel Bailey didn’t remember what he was talking about; but a few words from Mr. Edison jogged his memory, and he reported that the results met Mr. Edison's expectations."
It might be expected that Edison would have extreme and even radical ideas on the subject of education—and he has, as well as a perfect readiness to express them, because he considers that time is wasted on things that are not essential: "What we need," he has said, "are men capable of doing work. I wouldn't give a penny for the ordinary college graduate, except those from the institutes of technology. Those coming up from the ranks are a darned sight better than the others. They aren't filled up with Latin, philosophy, and the rest of that ninny stuff." A further remark of his is: "What the country needs now is the practical skilled engineer, who is capable of doing everything. In three or four centuries, when the country is settled, and commercialism is diminished, there will be time for the literary men. At present we want engineers, industrial men, good business-like managers, and railroad men." It is hardly to be marvelled at that such views should elicit warm protest, summed up in the comment: "Mr. Edison and many like him see in reverse the course of human progress. Invention does not smooth the way for the practical men and make them possible. There is always too much danger of neglecting thoughts for things, ideas for machinery. No theory of education that aggravates this danger is consistent with national well-being."
It might be expected that Edison would have extreme and even radical ideas about education—and he does, along with a complete willingness to share them because he believes that time is wasted on non-essential things: "What we need," he has said, "are people capable of getting things done. I wouldn't pay a dime for the average college graduate, except those from technical institutes. Those who come up from the ranks are a whole lot better than the others. They aren't bogged down with Latin, philosophy, and all that nonsense." Another remark of his is: "What the country needs now is practical skilled engineers who can do everything. In three or four centuries, when the country is settled and commercialism is toned down, there will be time for literary types. Right now, we want engineers, industrial workers, competent managers, and railroad experts." It's not surprising that such views provoke strong responses, summed up in the comment: "Mr. Edison and many like him have a backward view of human progress. Invention doesn't clear the way for practical people and make them possible. There's always the risk of neglecting ideas for things, thoughts for machinery. No educational theory that increases this risk aligns with the national interest."
Edison is slow to discuss the great mysteries of life, but is of reverential attitude of mind, and ever tolerant of others' beliefs. He is not a religious man in the sense of turning to forms and creeds, but, as might be expected, is inclined as an inventor and creator to argue from the basis of "design" and thence to infer a designer. "After years of watching the processes of nature," he says, "I can no more doubt the existence of an Intelligence that is running things than I do of the existence of myself. Take, for example, the substance water that forms the crystals known as ice. Now, there are hundreds of combinations that form crystals, and every one of them, save ice, sinks in water. Ice, I say, doesn't, and it is rather lucky for us mortals, for if it had done so, we would all be dead. Why? Simply because if ice sank to the bottoms of rivers, lakes, and oceans as fast as it froze, those places would be frozen up and there would be no water left. That is only one example out of thousands that to me prove beyond the possibility of a doubt that some vast Intelligence is governing this and other planets."
Edison is slow to talk about the big mysteries of life, but he has a respectful mindset and is always tolerant of other people's beliefs. He’s not religious in the traditional sense of adhering to specific rituals or doctrines, but as an inventor and creator, he tends to argue from the perspective of "design" and then infer the existence of a designer. "After years of observing the processes of nature," he says, "I have no more doubt about the presence of an Intelligence that is running things than I do about my own existence. Take, for instance, the substance water that makes the crystals known as ice. There are hundreds of combinations that create crystals, and every single one of them, except for ice, sinks in water. Ice, I argue, doesn’t, and it’s quite fortunate for us humans because if it did, we would all be dead. Why? Simply because if ice sank to the bottoms of rivers, lakes, and oceans as quickly as it froze, those bodies of water would be completely frozen over and there would be no water left. That’s just one example out of thousands that, to me, clearly demonstrate that some vast Intelligence is governing this planet and others."
A few words as to the domestic and personal side of Edison's life, to which many incidental references have already been made in these pages. He was married in 1873 to Miss Mary Stillwell, who died in 1884, leaving three children—Thomas Alva, William Leslie, and Marion Estelle.
A few words about the home and personal life of Edison, which have already been mentioned several times in these pages. He married Miss Mary Stillwell in 1873, who passed away in 1884, leaving behind three children—Thomas Alva, William Leslie, and Marion Estelle.
Mr. Edison was married again in 1886 to Miss Mina Miller, daughter of Mr. Lewis Miller, a distinguished pioneer inventor and manufacturer in the field of agricultural machinery, and equally entitled to fame as the father of the "Chautauqua idea," and the founder with Bishop Vincent of the original Chautauqua, which now has so many replicas all over the country, and which started in motion one of the great modern educational and moral forces in America. By this marriage there are three children—Charles, Madeline, and Theodore.
Mr. Edison remarried in 1886 to Miss Mina Miller, the daughter of Mr. Lewis Miller, a notable early inventor and manufacturer in agricultural machinery. He is also well-known as the father of the "Chautauqua idea" and the co-founder, along with Bishop Vincent, of the original Chautauqua, which now has many replicas across the country and sparked one of the major modern educational and moral movements in America. From this marriage, they had three children—Charles, Madeline, and Theodore.
For over a score of years, dating from his marriage to Miss Miller, Edison's happy and perfect domestic life has been spent at Glenmont, a beautiful property acquired at that time in Llewellyn Park, on the higher slopes of Orange Mountain, New Jersey, within easy walking distance of the laboratory at the foot of the hill in West Orange. As noted already, the latter part of each winter is spent at Fort Myers, Florida, where Edison has, on the banks of the Calahoutchie River, a plantation home that is in many ways a miniature copy of the home and laboratory up North. Glenmont is a rather elaborate and florid building in Queen Anne English style, of brick, stone, and wooden beams showing on the exterior, with an abundance of gables and balconies. It is set in an environment of woods and sweeps of lawn, flanked by unusually large conservatories, and always bright in summer with glowing flower beds. It would be difficult to imagine Edison in a stiffly formal house, and this big, cozy, three-story, rambling mansion has an easy freedom about it, without and within, quite in keeping with the genius of the inventor, but revealing at every turn traces of feminine taste and culture. The ground floor, consisting chiefly of broad drawing-rooms, parlors, and dining-hall, is chiefly noteworthy for the "den," or lounging-room, at the end of the main axis, where the family and friends are likely to be found in the evening hours, unless the party has withdrawn for more intimate social intercourse to the interesting and fascinating private library on the floor above. The lounging-room on the ground floor is more or less of an Edison museum, for it is littered with souvenirs from great people, and with mementos of travel, all related to some event or episode. A large cabinet contains awards, decorations, and medals presented to Edison, accumulating in the course of a long career, some of which may be seen in the illustration opposite. Near by may be noticed a bronze replica of the Edison gold medal which was founded in the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, the first award of which was made to Elihu Thomson during the present year (1910). There are statues of serpentine marble, gifts of the late Tsar of Russia, whose admiration is also represented by a gorgeous inlaid and enamelled cigar-case.
For over twenty years, starting from his marriage to Miss Miller, Edison has enjoyed a happy and perfect family life at Glenmont, a lovely property he acquired back then in Llewellyn Park, on the higher slopes of Orange Mountain, New Jersey. It's just a short walk to his lab at the foot of the hill in West Orange. As mentioned earlier, he spends the latter part of each winter in Fort Myers, Florida, where he has a plantation home by the Calahoutchie River that closely resembles his home and lab up North. Glenmont is an elaborate and ornate building in Queen Anne English style, made of brick, stone, and exposed wooden beams, featuring plenty of gables and balconies. It sits amid woods and sprawling lawns, flanked by unusually large conservatories, and it’s always bright in summer with colorful flower beds. It’s hard to picture Edison in a stiff, formal house, and this large, cozy, three-story mansion has a relaxed vibe, both inside and out, that aligns with the genius of the inventor while also showing evidence of feminine taste and culture. The ground floor, which mainly includes wide drawing-rooms, parlors, and a dining hall, is particularly known for the "den" or lounging room at the end of the main corridor, where family and friends often gather in the evenings, unless they’ve moved to the intriguing private library on the floor above for more intimate conversations. The lounging room on the ground floor acts almost like an Edison museum, filled with souvenirs from notable people and travel mementos, each connected to some event or story. A large cabinet showcases the awards, decorations, and medals Edison has received throughout his long career, some of which can be seen in the illustration across from here. Nearby, there’s a bronze replica of the Edison gold medal established by the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, the first of which was awarded to Elihu Thomson this year (1910). There are also statues made of serpentine marble, gifts from the late Tsar of Russia, whose admiration is further represented by a stunning inlaid and enamelled cigar case.
There are typical bronze vases from the Society of Engineers of Japan, and a striking desk-set of writing apparatus from Krupp, all the pieces being made out of tiny but massive guns and shells of Krupp steel. In addition to such bric-a-brac and bibelots of all kinds are many pictures and photographs, including the original sketches of the reception given to Edison in 1889 by the Paris Figaro, and a letter from Madame Carnot, placing the Presidential opera-box at the disposal of Mr. and Mrs. Edison. One of the most conspicuous features of the room is a phonograph equipment on which the latest and best productions by the greatest singers and musicians can always be heard, but which Edison himself is everlastingly experimenting with, under the incurable delusion that this domestic retreat is but an extension of his laboratory.
There are typical bronze vases from the Society of Engineers of Japan, and a striking desk set for writing made from tiny but sturdy guns and shells of Krupp steel. Alongside these curios and various collectibles, there are many pictures and photographs, including the original sketches of the reception given to Edison in 1889 by the Paris Figaro, and a letter from Madame Carnot, offering the Presidential opera box to Mr. and Mrs. Edison. One of the most noticeable features of the room is a phonograph setup where the latest and greatest works by the top singers and musicians can always be heard, but Edison is constantly experimenting with it, under the unshakeable belief that this home space is just an extension of his laboratory.
The big library—semi-boudoir—up-stairs is also very expressive of the home life of Edison, but again typical of his nature and disposition, for it is difficult to overlay his many technical books and scientific periodicals with a sufficiently thick crust of popular magazines or current literature to prevent their outcropping into evidence. In like manner the chat and conversation here, however lightly it may begin, turns invariably to large questions and deep problems, especially in the fields of discovery and invention; and Edison, in an easy-chair, will sit through the long evenings till one or two in the morning, pulling meditatively at his eyebrows, quoting something he has just read pertinent to the discussion, hearing and telling new stories with gusto, offering all kinds of ingenious suggestions, and without fail getting hold of pads and sheets of paper on which to make illustrative sketches. He is wonderfully handy with the pencil, and will sometimes amuse himself, while chatting, with making all kinds of fancy bits of penmanship, twisting his signature into circles and squares, but always writing straight lines—so straight they could not be ruled truer. Many a night it is a question of getting Edison to bed, for he would much rather probe a problem than eat or sleep; but at whatever hour the visitor retires or gets up, he is sure to find the master of the house on hand, serene and reposeful, and just as brisk at dawn as when he allowed the conversation to break up at midnight. The ordinary routine of daily family life is of course often interrupted by receptions and parties, visits to the billiard-room, the entertainment of visitors, the departure to and return from college, at vacation periods, of the young people, and matters relating to the many social and philanthropic causes in which Mrs. Edison is actively interested; but, as a matter of fact, Edison's round of toil and relaxation is singularly uniform and free from agitation, and that is the way he would rather have it.
The large library upstairs, which has a bit of a boudoir feel, really shows what life at home with Edison is like. It's also typical of his nature because it's hard to hide his numerous technical books and scientific journals under a layer of popular magazines or current literature. Similarly, conversations here, no matter how casually they start, always gravitate toward big questions and complex issues, especially regarding discovery and invention. Edison will often sit in a comfy chair for long evenings, sometimes until one or two in the morning, thoughtfully tugging at his eyebrows, referencing something he just read that's relevant to the discussion, enthusiastically sharing and hearing new stories, suggesting all kinds of clever ideas, and he always grabs pads and sheets of paper to make illustrative sketches. He’s really skilled with a pencil and will often entertain himself while chatting by creating all sorts of intricate signatures, twisting his name into circles and squares, but always keeping his lines perfectly straight—so straight they couldn't be drawn any better. Many nights, it's a challenge to get Edison to go to bed because he’d rather tackle a problem than eat or sleep; however, no matter what time guests leave or wake up, they'll find the master of the house there, calm and relaxed, just as active at dawn as he was when the conversation wrapped up at midnight. The usual daily life of the family is often disrupted by gatherings, parties, visits to the billiard room, entertaining guests, and the comings and goings of the young people during college breaks, along with various social and philanthropic causes that Mrs. Edison is involved in. However, Edison's schedule of work and relaxation is quite steady and free from chaos, and that's just how he prefers it.
Edison at sixty-three has a fine physique, and being free from serious ailments of any kind, should carry on the traditions of his long-lived ancestors as to a vigorous old age. His hair has whitened, but is still thick and abundant, and though he uses glasses for certain work, his gray-blue eyes are as keen and bright and deeply lustrous as ever, with the direct, searching look in them that they have ever worn. He stands five feet nine and one-half inches high, weighs one hundred and seventy-five pounds, and has not varied as to weight in a quarter of a century, although as a young man he was slim to gauntness. He is very abstemious, hardly ever touching alcohol, caring little for meat, but fond of fruit, and never averse to a strong cup of coffee or a good cigar. He takes extremely little exercise, although his good color and quickness of step would suggest to those who do not know better that he is in the best of training, and one who lives in the open air.
Edison, at sixty-three, has a strong physique and, being free from any serious health issues, is set to carry on the legacy of his long-lived ancestors with a vibrant old age. His hair has turned white, but it's still thick and full. Although he uses glasses for certain tasks, his gray-blue eyes remain sharp, bright, and deeply vibrant, with the same direct, probing gaze they've always had. He stands five feet nine and a half inches tall, weighs one hundred seventy-five pounds, and hasn't changed in weight in twenty-five years, despite being quite thin in his youth. He is very modest about his diet, rarely drinking alcohol, not much into meat, but he loves fruit and has no objection to a strong cup of coffee or a good cigar. He doesn't get much exercise, yet his healthy complexion and quick pace would lead those unfamiliar with him to believe he’s in top shape and spends a lot of time outdoors.
His simplicity as to clothes has already been described. One would be startled to see him with a bright tie, a loud checked suit, or a fancy waistcoat, and yet there is a curious sense of fastidiousness about the plain things he delights in. Perhaps he is not wholly responsible personally for this state of affairs. In conversation Edison is direct, courteous, ready to discuss a topic with anybody worth talking to, and, in spite of his sore deafness, an excellent listener. No one ever goes away from Edison in doubt as to what he thinks or means, but he is ever shy and diffident to a degree if the talk turns on himself rather than on his work.
His simplicity in clothing has already been discussed. You would be surprised to see him wearing a bright tie, a loud checked suit, or an elaborate waistcoat, and yet there's an interesting attention to detail in the plain things he enjoys. Maybe he isn’t entirely to blame for this situation. In conversation, Edison is straightforward, polite, and willing to engage in discussions with anyone worth chatting with, and despite his hearing impairment, he's an excellent listener. No one leaves a conversation with Edison uncertain about what he thinks or means, but he often becomes shy and hesitant if the discussion shifts to himself instead of his work.
If the authors were asked, after having written the foregoing pages, to explain here the reason for Edison's success, based upon their observations so far made, they would first answer that he combines with a vigorous and normal physical structure a mind capable of clear and logical thinking, and an imagination of unusual activity. But this would by no means offer a complete explanation. There are many men of equal bodily and mental vigor who have not achieved a tithe of his accomplishment. What other factors are there to be taken into consideration to explain this phenomenon? First, a stolid, almost phlegmatic, nervous system which takes absolutely no notice of ennui—a system like that of a Chinese ivory-carver who works day after day and month after month on a piece of material no larger than your hand. No better illustration of this characteristic can be found than in the development of the nickel pocket for the storage battery, an element the size of a short lead-pencil, on which upward of five years were spent in experiments, costing over a million dollars, day after day, always apparently with the same tubes but with small variations carefully tabulated in the note-books. To an ordinary person the mere sight of such a tube would have been as distasteful, certainly after a week or so, as the smell of a quail to a man striving to eat one every day for a month, near the end of his gastronomic ordeal. But to Edison these small perforated steel tubes held out as much of a fascination at the end of five years as when the search was first begun, and every morning found him as eager to begin the investigation anew as if the battery was an absolutely novel problem to which his thoughts had just been directed.
If the authors were asked, after writing the previous pages, to explain why Edison succeeded based on their observations so far, they would first say that he combines a strong and healthy body with a mind capable of clear and logical thinking and a highly active imagination. But that wouldn’t fully explain it. There are many people with the same physical and mental strength who haven't accomplished nearly as much as he has. What other factors should we consider to understand this phenomenon? First, there's his remarkably calm and unbothered nervous system, which shows no signs of boredom—similar to a Chinese ivory carver who works day after day and month after month on a piece as small as your hand. A great example of this trait is the development of the nickel pocket for the storage battery, a component the size of a short pencil, on which more than five years and over a million dollars were spent on experiments, day after day, always seemingly with the same tubes but with small variations carefully noted in the notebooks. To an ordinary person, just seeing such a tube after a week or so would be as unappealing as the smell of a quail for someone who had to eat one every day for a month, nearing the end of that culinary challenge. But for Edison, those small perforated steel tubes remained just as fascinating after five years as they did when the search first began, and every morning he was just as eager to dive back into the investigation as if the battery was a completely new problem that had just caught his attention.
Another and second characteristic of Edison's personality contributing so strongly to his achievements is an intense, not to say courageous, optimism in which no thought of failure can enter, an optimism born of self-confidence, and becoming—after forty or fifty years of experience more and more a sense of certainty in the accomplishment of success. In the overcoming of difficulties he has the same intellectual pleasure as the chess-master when confronted with a problem requiring all the efforts of his skill and experience to solve. To advance along smooth and pleasant paths, to encounter no obstacles, to wrestle with no difficulties and hardships—such has absolutely no fascination to him. He meets obstruction with the keen delight of a strong man battling with the waves and opposing them in sheer enjoyment, and the greater and more apparently overwhelming the forces that may tend to sweep him back, the more vigorous his own efforts to forge through them. At the conclusion of the ore-milling experiments, when practically his entire fortune was sunk in an enterprise that had to be considered an impossibility, when at the age of fifty he looked back upon five or six years of intense activity expended apparently for naught, when everything seemed most black and the financial clouds were quickly gathering on the horizon, not the slightest idea of repining entered his mind. The main experiment had succeeded—he had accomplished what he sought for. Nature at another point had outstripped him, yet he had broadened his own sum of knowledge to a prodigious extent. It was only during the past summer (1910) that one of the writers spent a Sunday with him riding over the beautiful New Jersey roads in an automobile, Edison in the highest spirits and pointing out with the keenest enjoyment the many beautiful views of valley and wood. The wanderings led to the old ore-milling plant at Edison, now practically a mass of deserted buildings all going to decay. It was a depressing sight, marking such titanic but futile struggles with nature. To Edison, however, no trace of sentiment or regret occurred, and the whole ruins were apparently as much a matter of unconcern as if he were viewing the remains of Pompeii. Sitting on the porch of the White House, where he lived during that period, in the light of the setting sun, his fine face in repose, he looked as placidly over the scene as a happy farmer over a field of ripening corn. All that he said was: "I never felt better in my life than during the five years I worked here. Hard work, nothing to divert my thought, clear air and simple food made my life very pleasant. We learned a great deal. It will be of benefit to some one some time." Similarly, in connection with the storage battery, after having experimented continuously for three years, it was found to fall below his expectations, and its manufacture had to be stopped. Hundreds of thousands of dollars had been spent on the experiments, and, largely without Edison's consent, the battery had been very generally exploited in the press. To stop meant not only to pocket a great loss already incurred, facing a dark and uncertain future, but to most men animated by ordinary human feelings, it meant more than anything else, an injury to personal pride. Pride? Pooh! that had nothing to do with the really serious practical problem, and the writers can testify that at the moment when his decision was reached, work stopped and the long vista ahead was peered into, Edison was as little concerned as if he had concluded that, after all, perhaps peach-pie might be better for present diet than apple-pie. He has often said that time meant very little to him, that he had but a small realization of its passage, and that ten or twenty years were as nothing when considering the development of a vital invention.
Another key characteristic of Edison's personality that greatly contributed to his achievements is his intense, almost fearless optimism, where no thought of failure exists. This optimism stems from his self-confidence and, after forty or fifty years of experience, has evolved into a strong certainty of success. He finds the same intellectual enjoyment in overcoming challenges as a chess master does when faced with a problem that tests all their skills and experience. The idea of progressing along easy, trouble-free paths holds no interest for him. He confronts obstacles with the thrill of a strong person fighting against the waves for sheer enjoyment, and the more daunting the forces trying to hold him back, the more determined his efforts become. At the end of the ore-milling experiments, when nearly his entire fortune was invested in what many considered an impossible venture, and at age fifty, he looked back on five or six years of intense work that seemed wasted, with everything appearing bleak and financial ruin looming, the tiniest thought of regret didn’t cross his mind. The main experiment had succeeded—he had achieved his goal. Although nature had outpaced him in another area, he had greatly expanded his knowledge. Just last summer (1910), one of the writers spent a Sunday with him driving over the beautiful New Jersey roads in a car, with Edison in great spirits, excitedly pointing out the stunning views of valleys and woods. Their journey led them to the old ore-milling plant at Edison, now mostly abandoned and decaying. It was a disheartening sight, representing epic yet futile battles against nature. However, Edison showed no sign of sentimentality or regret; to him, the ruins were just as indifferent as viewing the remains of Pompeii. While sitting on the porch of the White House, where he lived during that time, in the glow of the setting sun, his calm expression resembled that of a happy farmer observing a field of ripening corn. All he said was: "I never felt better in my life than during the five years I worked here. Hard work, no distractions, fresh air, and simple food made my life very enjoyable. We learned a lot. It will benefit someone someday." In the case of the storage battery, after three years of continuous experimentation that fell short of his expectations, production had to be halted. Hundreds of thousands of dollars had been spent on the experiments, and the battery had been widely promoted in the press, often without Edison's approval. Stopping meant accepting a significant loss and facing an uncertain future, which for most people would hurt their pride. Pride? Nonsense! That was irrelevant to the real, practical problem at hand, and those present can attest that when he made the decision to stop the work and looked into the uncertain future, Edison was as unconcerned as if he had decided that maybe peach pie was a better choice than apple pie. He often stated that time meant very little to him, that he scarcely noticed its passage, and that ten or twenty years felt inconsequential when considering the true development of an essential invention.
These references to personal pride recall another characteristic of Edison wherein he differs from most men. There are many individuals who derive an intense and not improper pleasure in regalia or military garments, with plenty of gold braid and brass buttons, and thus arrayed, in appearing before their friends and neighbors. Putting at the head of the procession the man who makes his appeal to public attention solely because of the brilliancy of his plumage, and passing down the ranks through the multitudes having a gradually decreasing sense of vanity in their personal accomplishment, Edison would be placed at the very end. Reference herein has been made to the fact that one of the two great English universities wished to confer a degree upon him, but that he was unable to leave his work for the brief time necessary to accept the honor. At that occasion it was pointed out to him that he should make every possible sacrifice to go, that the compliment was great, and that but few Americans had been so recognized. It was hopeless—an appeal based on sentiment. Before him was something real—work to be accomplished—a problem to be solved. Beyond, was a prize as intangible as the button of the Legion of Honor, which he concealed from his friends that they might not feel he was "showing off." The fact is that Edison cares little for the approval of the world, but that he cares everything for the approval of himself. Difficult as it may be—perhaps impossible—to trace its origin, Edison possesses what he would probably call a well-developed case of New England conscience, for whose approval he is incessantly occupied.
These references to personal pride highlight another trait of Edison that sets him apart from most people. Many individuals take great, and not entirely inappropriate, pleasure in their uniforms or military attire, adorned with gold braid and brass buttons, as they present themselves before friends and neighbors. If you were to lead a parade with the person who seeks public attention solely for their flashy appearance, and then walk by all the others who gradually have a lesser sense of vanity about their own achievements, Edison would be at the very back. It’s been noted that one of the two major English universities wanted to award him a degree, but he couldn't step away from his work, even for a short time, to accept the honor. At that moment, people urged him to make any sacrifice to go, saying it was a significant compliment and that few Americans had received such recognition. It was a lost cause—an appeal based on sentiment. What mattered to him was something tangible—work to be done—a problem to solve. Beyond that was a reward as intangible as the button of the Legion of Honor, which he kept hidden from his friends to avoid appearing "showy." The reality is that Edison cares little for the world's approval, but he values his own self-approval above all. As difficult as it may be—perhaps even impossible—to determine its origin, Edison has what he would likely describe as a strong sense of New England conscience, for whose approval he is continuously striving.
These, then, may be taken as the characteristics of Edison that have enabled him to accomplish more than most men—a strong body, a clear and active mind, a developed imagination, a capacity of great mental and physical concentration, an iron-clad nervous system that knows no ennui, intense optimism, and courageous self-confidence. Any one having these capacities developed to the same extent, with the same opportunities for use, would probably accomplish as much. And yet there is a peculiarity about him that so far as is known has never been referred to before in print. He seems to be conscientiously afraid of appearing indolent, and in consequence subjects himself regularly to unnecessary hardship. Working all night is seldom necessary, or until two or three o'clock in the morning, yet even now he persists in such tests upon his strength. Recently one of the writers had occasion to present to him a long typewritten document of upward of thirty pages for his approval. It was taken home to Glenmont. Edison had a few minor corrections to make, probably not more than a dozen all told. They could have been embodied by interlineations and marginal notes in the ordinary way, and certainly would not have required more than ten or fifteen minutes of his time. Yet what did he do? HE COPIED OUT PAINSTAKINGLY THE ENTIRE PAPER IN LONG HAND, embodying the corrections as he went along, and presented the result of his work the following morning. At the very least such a task must have occupied several hours. How can such a trait—and scores of similar experiences could be given—be explained except by the fact that, evidently, he felt the need of special schooling in industry—that under no circumstances must he allow a thought of indolence to enter his mind?
These are the traits that have allowed Edison to achieve more than most people—a strong body, a sharp and active mind, a developed imagination, a strong ability to concentrate mentally and physically, a resilient nervous system that doesn't get bored, intense optimism, and bold self-confidence. Anyone with these abilities developed to the same degree, given the same opportunities, would likely achieve just as much. Yet there’s something unique about him that appears to have never been mentioned before in print. He seems genuinely afraid of coming off as lazy, and as a result, he regularly puts himself through unnecessary hardships. Working through the night is rarely needed, especially until two or three in the morning, but he continues to push himself in that way. Recently, one of the writers needed to present a lengthy typewritten document of over thirty pages for his approval. It was taken home to Glenmont. Edison had a few minor corrections to make, probably no more than a dozen altogether. Those could have been noted with simple changes and comments, and certainly wouldn’t have taken more than ten to fifteen minutes of his time. But what did he do? HE COPIED THE ENTIRE PAPER BY HAND, carefully making the corrections as he went, and presented the result the next morning. At the very least, that task must have taken several hours. How can we explain such a trait—and many similar experiences—other than the fact that he clearly felt a need for rigorous discipline in his work—that he must never let a thought of laziness cross his mind?
Undoubtedly in the days to come Edison will not only be recognized as an intellectual prodigy, but as a prodigy of industry—of hard work. In his field as inventor and man of science he stands as clear-cut and secure as the lighthouse on a rock, and as indifferent to the tumult around. But as the "old man"—and before he was thirty years old he was affectionately so called by his laboratory associates—he is a normal, fun-loving, typical American. His sense of humor is intense, but not of the hothouse, overdeveloped variety. One of his favorite jokes is to enter the legal department with an air of great humility and apply for a job as an inventor! Never is he so preoccupied or fretted with cares as not to drop all thought of his work for a few moments to listen to a new story, with a ready smile all the while, and a hearty, boyish laugh at the end. His laugh, in fact, is sometimes almost aboriginal; slapping his hands delightedly on his knees, he rocks back and forth and fairly shouts his pleasure. Recently a daily report of one of his companies that had just been started contained a large order amounting to several thousand dollars, and was returned by him with a miniature sketch of a small individual viewing that particular item through a telescope! His facility in making hasty but intensely graphic sketches is proverbial. He takes great delight in imitating the lingo of the New York street gamin. A dignified person named James may be greeted with: "Hully Gee! Chimmy, when did youse blow in?" He likes to mimic and imitate types, generally, that are distasteful to him. The sanctimonious hypocrite, the sleek speculator, and others whom he has probably encountered in life are done "to the queen's taste."
Without a doubt, in the future, Edison will be seen not just as a genius but also as a remarkable figure in industry—one who works extremely hard. In his role as an inventor and scientist, he stands as solid and steadfast as a lighthouse on a rock, completely unfazed by the chaos surrounding him. However, as the "old man"—a nickname affectionately given to him by his lab team before he even turned thirty—he is just a regular, fun-loving, typical American. His sense of humor is strong, but it’s not overly refined or exaggerated. One of his favorite jokes is to walk into the legal department with a humble demeanor and ask for a job as an inventor! He’s never too absorbed or stressed to pause for a moment to hear a new story, always ready with a smile and a hearty, boyish laugh at the end. His laughter, in fact, is almost primal; he enthusiastically slaps his knees and rocks back and forth, practically shouting with joy. Recently, one of his companies, which had just launched, sent him a daily report that included a large order worth several thousand dollars. He returned it with a small drawing of a person viewing that order through a telescope! His talent for making quick but vividly expressive sketches is well-known. He takes great pleasure in mimicking the slang of New York street kids. A respectable guy named James might be greeted with, “Hully gee! Chimmy, when did you blow in?” He enjoys imitating and mocking people he finds distasteful, like the self-righteous hypocrite or the slick speculator, and he captures them perfectly.
One very cold winter's day he entered the laboratory library in fine spirits, "doing" the decayed dandy, with imaginary cane under his arm, struggling to put on a pair of tattered imaginary gloves, with a self-satisfied smirk and leer that would have done credit to a real comedian. This particular bit of acting was heightened by the fact that even in the coldest weather he wears thin summer clothes, generally acid-worn and more or less disreputable. For protection he varies the number of his suits of underclothing, sometimes wearing three or four sets, according to the thermometer.
One very cold winter day, he walked into the laboratory library in great spirits, "playing" the faded dandy, with an imaginary cane under his arm, trying to put on a pair of tattered imaginary gloves, with a self-satisfied smirk and grin that would impress any real comedian. This particular performance was intensified by the fact that even in the coldest weather, he wore thin summer clothes, usually worn down and somewhat shabby. To keep warm, he adjusts the number of layers of underclothing he wears, sometimes donning three or four sets, depending on the temperature.
If one could divorce Edison from the idea of work, and could regard him separate and apart from his embodiment as an inventor and man of science, it might truly be asserted that his temperament is essentially mercurial. Often he is in the highest spirits, with all the spontaneity of youth, and again he is depressed, moody, and violently angry. Anger with him, however, is a good deal like the story attributed to Napoleon:
If you could separate Edison from the concept of work and see him apart from his role as an inventor and scientist, you could honestly say that his personality is very changeable. Sometimes he is full of energy and excitement, like a young person, and other times he can be down, moody, and extremely angry. But his anger resembles the story often linked to Napoleon:
"Sire, how is it that your judgment is not affected by your great rage?" asked one of his courtiers.
"Sire, how is it that your judgment isn't influenced by your intense anger?" asked one of his courtiers.
"Because," said the Emperor, "I never allow it to rise above this line," drawing his hand across his throat. Edison has been seen sometimes almost beside himself with anger at a stupid mistake or inexcusable oversight on the part of an assistant, his voice raised to a high pitch, sneeringly expressing his feelings of contempt for the offender; and yet when the culprit, like a bad school-boy, has left the room, Edison has immediately returned to his normal poise, and the incident is a thing of the past. At other times the unsettled condition persists, and his spleen is vented not only on the original instigator but upon others who may have occasion to see him, sometimes hours afterward. When such a fit is on him the word is quickly passed around, and but few of his associates find it necessary to consult with him at the time. The genuine anger can generally be distinguished from the imitation article by those who know him intimately by the fact that when really enraged his forehead between the eyes partakes of a curious rotary movement that cannot be adequately described in words. It is as if the storm-clouds within are moving like a whirling cyclone. As a general rule, Edison does not get genuinely angry at mistakes and other human weaknesses of his subordinates; at best he merely simulates anger. But woe betide the one who has committed an act of bad faith, treachery, dishonesty, or ingratitude; THEN Edison can show what it is for a strong man to get downright mad. But in this respect he is singularly free, and his spells of anger are really few. In fact, those who know him best are continually surprised at his moderation and patience, often when there has been great provocation. People who come in contact with him and who may have occasion to oppose his views, may leave with the impression that he is hot-tempered; nothing could be further from the truth. He argues his point with great vehemence, pounds on the table to emphasize his views, and illustrates his theme with a wealth of apt similes; but, on account of his deafness, it is difficult to make the argument really two-sided. Before the visitor can fully explain his side of the matter some point is brought up that starts Edison off again, and new arguments from his viewpoint are poured forth. This constant interruption is taken by many to mean that Edison has a small opinion of any arguments that oppose him; but he is only intensely in earnest in presenting his own side. If the visitor persists until Edison has seen both sides of the controversy, he is always willing to frankly admit that his own views may be unsound and that his opponent is right. In fact, after such a controversy, both parties going after each other hammer and tongs, the arguments TO HIM being carried on at the very top of one's voice to enable him to hear, and FROM HIM being equally loud in the excitement of the discussion, he has often said: "I see now that my position was absolutely rotten."
"Because," said the Emperor, "I never let it rise above this line," drawing his hand across his throat. Edison has sometimes been seen almost beside himself with anger at a stupid mistake or inexcusable oversight on the part of an assistant, his voice raised to a high pitch, sneeringly expressing his contempt for the offender; and yet when the culprit, like a bad schoolboy, leaves the room, Edison quickly returns to his normal self, and the incident becomes a thing of the past. At other times, the unsettled mood lingers, and his irritation is directed not only at the original instigator but also at others who might see him, sometimes even hours later. When he’s in such a mood, the word spreads fast, and few of his associates feel the need to consult with him at that time. Those who know him well can usually tell genuine anger from a facade by the fact that when he is truly enraged, his forehead between his eyes exhibits a strange rotary movement that's hard to put into words. It's as if the storm-clouds within him are swirling like a cyclone. Generally, Edison doesn't genuinely get upset about mistakes and other human flaws of his subordinates; he mostly just pretends to be angry. But beware of anyone who commits an act of bad faith, treachery, dishonesty, or ingratitude; THEN Edison really shows what it’s like for a strong man to get genuinely mad. However, he is notably infrequent in his moments of anger, and those who know him best are often surprised by his moderation and patience, even when provoked significantly. People who interact with him and may oppose his views might leave thinking he’s hot-tempered; nothing could be further from the truth. He argues his point with great passion, pounds on the table to emphasize his views, and illustrates his arguments with a wealth of fitting similes; but due to his deafness, it’s hard to make the discussion truly two-sided. Before the visitor can completely explain their position, some point comes up that starts Edison off again, and he pours out new arguments from his perspective. This constant interruption leads many to think that Edison doesn’t respect opposing views; he’s just intensely focused on presenting his side. If the visitor persists until Edison sees both sides of the debate, he’s always willing to admit that his own views might be flawed and that his opponent is right. In fact, after such a heated discussion, with both parties going after each other loudly so he can hear, Edison has often said, "I see now that my position was absolutely wrong."
Obviously, however, all of these personal characteristics have nothing to do with Edison's position in the world of affairs. They show him to be a plain, easy-going, placid American, with no sense of self-importance, and ready at all times to have his mind turned into a lighter channel. In private life they show him to be a good citizen, a good family man, absolutely moral, temperate in all things, and of great charitableness to all mankind. But what of his position in the age in which he lives? Where does he rank in the mountain range of great Americans?
Clearly, all these personal traits have nothing to do with Edison's status in the world. They reveal him to be a down-to-earth, easy-going, calm American, without any self-importance, always willing to shift his focus to something lighter. In his personal life, he appears to be a good citizen, a devoted family man, completely moral, moderate in all things, and very charitable to everyone. But what about his standing in the era he lives in? Where does he fit among the great Americans?
It is believed that from the other chapters of this book the reader can formulate his own answer to the question.
It’s thought that from the other chapters in this book, the reader can come up with their own answer to the question.
INTRODUCTION TO THE APPENDIX
THE reader who has followed the foregoing narrative may feel that inasmuch as it is intended to be an historical document, an appropriate addendum thereto would be a digest of all the inventions of Edison. The desirability of such a digest is not to be denied, but as there are some twenty-five hundred or more inventions to be considered (including those covered by caveats), the task of its preparation would be stupendous. Besides, the resultant data would extend this book into several additional volumes, thereby rendering it of value chiefly to the technical student, but taking it beyond the bounds of biography.
The reader who has followed the previous narrative might think that since it's meant to be a historical document, an appropriate addition would be a summary of all of Edison's inventions. The need for such a summary is clear, but since there are over twenty-five hundred inventions to review (including those listed in caveats), preparing it would be a massive undertaking. Moreover, the resulting information would turn this book into several more volumes, making it primarily useful to technical students and moving it away from being a biography.
We should, however, deem our presentation of Mr. Edison's work to be imperfectly executed if we neglected to include an intelligible exposition of the broader theoretical principles of his more important inventions. In the following Appendix we have therefore endeavored to present a few brief statements regarding Mr. Edison's principal inventions, classified as to subject-matter and explained in language as free from technicalities as is possible. No attempt has been made to conform with strictly scientific terminology, but, for the benefit of the general reader, well-understood conventional expressions, such as "flow of current," etc., have been employed. It should be borne in mind that each of the following items has been treated as a whole or class, generally speaking, and not as a digest of all the individual patents relating to it. Any one who is sufficiently interested can obtain copies of any of the patents referred to for five cents each by addressing the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C.
We should consider our presentation of Mr. Edison's work to be incomplete if we fail to include a clear explanation of the broader theoretical principles behind his most significant inventions. In the following Appendix, we have tried to provide a few concise statements about Mr. Edison's key inventions, organized by subject and explained in simple language as much as possible. We have not aimed to stick strictly to scientific terminology, but for the benefit of the general reader, we have used commonly understood terms, like "flow of current," etc. It's important to remember that each of the following items has been treated as a whole or category, generally speaking, and not as a summary of all the individual patents connected to it. Anyone who is interested can get copies of any of the mentioned patents for five cents each by contacting the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C.
APPENDIX
I. THE STOCK PRINTER
IN these modern days, when the Stock Ticker is in universal use, one seldom, if ever, hears the name of Edison coupled with the little instrument whose chatterings have such tremendous import to the whole world. It is of much interest, however, to remember the fact that it was by reason of his notable work in connection with this device that he first became known as an inventor. Indeed, it was through the intrinsic merits of his improvements in stock tickers that he made his real entree into commercial life.
IN these modern times, when the Stock Ticker is widely used, one rarely, if ever, hears Edison's name mentioned alongside the small device whose sounds have such significant importance to the entire world. It's quite interesting to remember that it was because of his remarkable work related to this instrument that he first gained recognition as an inventor. In fact, it was through the actual benefits of his enhancements in stock tickers that he made his real entry into commercial life.
The idea of the ticker did not originate with Edison, as we have already seen in Chapter VII of the preceding narrative, but at the time of his employment with the Western Union, in Boston, in 1868, the crudities of the earlier forms made an impression on his practical mind, and he got out an improved instrument of his own, which he introduced in Boston through the aid of a professional promoter. Edison, then only twenty-one, had less business experience than the promoter, through whose manipulation he soon lost his financial interest in this early ticker enterprise. The narrative tells of his coming to New York in 1869, and immediately plunging into the business of gold and stock reporting. It was at this period that his real work on stock printers commenced, first individually, and later as a co-worker with F. L. Pope. This inventive period extended over a number of years, during which time he took out forty-six patents on stock-printing instruments and devices, two of such patents being issued to Edison and Pope as joint inventors. These various inventions were mostly in the line of development of the art as it progressed during those early years, but out of it all came the Edison universal printer, which entered into very extensive use, and which is still used throughout the United States and in some foreign countries to a considerable extent at this very day.
The idea of the ticker didn’t start with Edison, as we’ve already seen in Chapter VII of the previous narrative. However, when he worked for Western Union in Boston in 1868, the primitive versions left a mark on his practical mind. He developed an improved device of his own and introduced it in Boston with the help of a professional promoter. Edison, then just twenty-one, had less business experience than the promoter, and he quickly lost his financial interest in this early ticker venture. The narrative mentions his arrival in New York in 1869, where he immediately jumped into the business of gold and stock reporting. It was during this time that he began his serious work on stock printers, initially on his own and later alongside F. L. Pope. This inventive phase lasted several years, during which he obtained forty-six patents for stock-printing instruments and devices, with two of those patents co-issued to Edison and Pope as joint inventors. Most of these inventions were primarily focused on developing the art as it evolved during those early years, but from all this emerged the Edison universal printer, which saw widespread use and is still utilized across the United States and in some foreign countries today.
Edison's inventive work on stock printers has left its mark upon the art as it exists at the present time. In his earlier work he directed his attention to the employment of a single-circuit system, in which only one wire was required, the two operations of setting the type-wheels and of printing being controlled by separate electromagnets which were actuated through polarized relays, as occasion required, one polarity energizing the electromagnet controlling the type-wheels, and the opposite polarity energizing the electromagnet controlling the printing. Later on, however, he changed over to a two-wire circuit, such as shown in Fig. 2 of this article in connection with the universal stock printer. In the earliest days of the stock printer, Edison realized the vital commercial importance of having all instruments recording precisely alike at the same moment, and it was he who first devised (in 1869) the "unison stop," by means of which all connected instruments could at any moment be brought to zero from the central transmitting station, and thus be made to work in correspondence with the central instrument and with one another. He also originated the idea of using only one inking-pad and shifting it from side to side to ink the type-wheels. It was also in Edison's stock printer that the principle of shifting type-wheels was first employed. Hence it will be seen that, as in many other arts, he made a lasting impression in this one by the intrinsic merits of the improvements resulting from his work therein.
Edison's innovative work on stock printers has significantly influenced the field as we know it today. In his early projects, he focused on a single-circuit system, which only required one wire. This system used two separate electromagnets controlled by polarized relays to manage the operations of setting the type-wheels and printing. One polarity would energize the electromagnet for the type-wheels, while the opposite polarity activated the one for printing. However, he later shifted to a two-wire circuit, as demonstrated in Fig. 2 of this article regarding the universal stock printer. In the initial days of the stock printer, Edison recognized the critical commercial need for all instruments to record simultaneously and identically. He was the first to introduce the "unison stop" in 1869, allowing all connected instruments to be reset to zero from the central station, ensuring they operated in sync with the central instrument and each other. He also came up with the idea of using a single inking-pad, moving it from side to side to ink the type-wheels. Furthermore, Edison's stock printer was the first to implement the principle of shifting type-wheels. Thus, as in many other fields, his contributions made a lasting impact through the significant advancements stemming from his work.
We shall not attempt to digest the forty-six patents above named, nor to follow Edison through the progressive steps which led to the completion of his universal printer, but shall simply present a sketch of the instrument itself, and follow with a very brief and general explanation of its theory. The Edison universal printer, as it virtually appears in practice, is illustrated in Fig. 1 below, from which it will be seen that the most prominent parts are the two type-wheels, the inking-pad, and the paper tape feeding from the reel, all appropriately placed in a substantial framework.
We won’t try to go into detail about the forty-six patents mentioned above, nor will we follow Edison through the steps that led to the creation of his universal printer. Instead, we’ll just provide an overview of the device itself and give a brief and general explanation of its theory. The Edison universal printer, as it practically appears, is shown in Fig. 1 below. From this, you can see that the main parts are the two type-wheels, the inking pad, and the paper tape feeding from the reel, all fitted into a solid framework.
The electromagnets and other actuating mechanism cannot be seen plainly in this figure, but are produced diagrammatically in Fig. 2, and somewhat enlarged for convenience of explanation.
The electromagnets and other moving parts aren’t clearly visible in this figure, but they are shown diagrammatically in Fig. 2, and enlarged for easier explanation.
It will be seen that there are two electromagnets, one of which, TM, is known as the "type-magnet," and the other, PM, as the "press-magnet," the former having to do with the operation of the type-wheels, and the latter with the pressing of the paper tape against them. As will be seen from the diagram, the armature, A, of the type-magnet has an extension arm, on the end of which is an escapement engaging with a toothed wheel placed at the extremity of the shaft carrying the type-wheels. This extension arm is pivoted at B. Hence, as the armature is alternately attracted when current passes around its electromagnet, and drawn up by the spring on cessation of current, it moves up and down, thus actuating the escapement and causing a rotation of the toothed wheel in the direction of the arrow. This, in turn, brings any desired letters or figures on the type-wheels to a central point, where they may be impressed upon the paper tape. One type-wheel carries letters, and the other one figures. These two wheels are mounted rigidly on a sleeve carried by the wheel-shaft. As it is desired to print from only one type-wheel at a time, it becomes necessary to shift them back and forth from time to time, in order to bring the desired characters in line with the paper tape. This is accomplished through the movements of a three-arm rocking-lever attached to the wheel-sleeve at the end of the shaft. This lever is actuated through the agency of two small pins carried by an arm projecting from the press-lever, PL. As the latter moves up and down the pins play upon the under side of the lower arm of the rocking-lever, thus canting it and pushing the type-wheels to the right or left, as the case may be. The operation of shifting the type-wheels will be given further on.
You'll see that there are two electromagnets: one called the "type-magnet" (TM), which is responsible for operating the type-wheels, and the other known as the "press-magnet" (PM), which presses the paper tape against them. As shown in the diagram, the armature (A) of the type-magnet has an extension arm with an escapement that engages a toothed wheel at the end of the shaft that holds the type-wheels. This extension arm is pivoted at B. Therefore, when the current flows through the electromagnet, it attracts the armature, and when the current stops, a spring pulls it back up, moving it up and down. This motion acts on the escapement, causing the toothed wheel to rotate in the direction of the arrow. This alignment brings the desired letters or figures on the type-wheels to a central position, where they can be printed onto the paper tape. One type-wheel has letters, and the other has figures. These two wheels are securely attached to a sleeve on the wheel-shaft. Since only one type-wheel should print at a time, they need to shift back and forth to align the correct characters with the paper tape. This is done using a three-arm rocking-lever attached to the wheel-sleeve at the end of the shaft. This lever is moved by two small pins on an arm that extends from the press-lever (PL). As the press-lever moves up and down, the pins push against the underside of the lower arm of the rocking-lever, tilting it and moving the type-wheels to the right or left as required. The process for shifting the type-wheels will be explained later.
The press-lever is actuated by the press-magnet. From the diagram it will be seen that the armature of the latter has a long, pivoted extension arm, or platen, trough-like in shape, in which the paper tape runs. It has already been noted that the object of the press-lever is to press this tape against that character of the type-wheel centrally located above it at the moment. It will at once be perceived that this action takes place when current flows through the electromagnet and its armature is attracted downward, the platen again dropping away from the type-wheel as the armature is released upon cessation of current. The paper "feed" is shown at the end of the press-lever, and consists of a push "dog," or pawl, which operates to urge the paper forward as the press-lever descends.
The press lever is operated by the press magnet. From the diagram, you can see that the armature of the magnet has a long, pivoted extension arm, or platen, shaped like a trough, where the paper tape runs through. It’s already been mentioned that the purpose of the press lever is to press the tape against the type on the wheel located above it at that moment. It's clear that this action occurs when current flows through the electromagnet and its armature is pulled down, with the platen dropping away from the type wheel when the armature is released once the current stops. The paper "feed" is shown at the end of the press lever and consists of a push "dog," or pawl, which moves the paper forward as the press lever goes down.
The worm-gear which appears in the diagram on the shaft, near the toothed wheel, forms part of the unison stop above referred to, but this device is not shown in full, in order to avoid unnecessary complications of the drawing.
The worm gear shown in the diagram on the shaft, close to the toothed wheel, is part of the unison stop mentioned earlier, but this device isn’t fully illustrated to keep the drawing simple.
At the right-hand side of the diagram (Fig. 2) is shown a portion of the transmitting apparatus at a central office. Generally speaking, this consists of a motor-driven cylinder having metallic pins placed at intervals, and arranged spirally, around its periphery. These pins correspond in number to the characters on the type-wheels. A keyboard (not shown) is arranged above the cylinder, having keys lettered and numbered corresponding to the letters and figures on the type-wheels. Upon depressing any one of these keys the motion of the cylinder is arrested when one of its pins is caught and held by the depressed key. When the key is released the cylinder continues in motion. Hence, it is evident that the revolution of the cylinder may be interrupted as often as desired by manipulation of the various keys in transmitting the letters and figures which are to be recorded by the printing instrument. The method of transmission will presently appear.
On the right side of the diagram (Fig. 2), you can see a part of the transmitting equipment in a central office. Generally, this consists of a motor-driven cylinder with metallic pins placed at intervals and arranged spirally around its edge. The number of these pins matches the characters on the type wheels. Above the cylinder is a keyboard (not shown) with keys that are labeled with letters and numbers that correspond to the letters and figures on the type wheels. When you press any of these keys, the motion of the cylinder stops as one of its pins is caught and held by the pressed key. Once the key is released, the cylinder continues to turn. Therefore, it's clear that the rotation of the cylinder can be interrupted as often as needed by pressing the various keys to send the letters and figures that will be recorded by the printing device. The transmission method will be explained shortly.
In the sketch (Fig. 2) there will be seen, mounted upon the cylinder shaft, two wheels made up of metallic segments insulated from each other, and upon the hubs of these wheels are two brushes which connect with the main battery. Resting upon the periphery of these two segmental wheels there are two brushes to which are connected the wires which carry the battery current to the type-magnet and press-magnet, respectively, as the brushes make circuit by coming in contact with the metallic segments. It will be remembered that upon the cylinder there are as many pins as there are characters on the type-wheels of the ticker, and one of the segmental wheels, W, has a like number of metallic segments, while upon the other wheel, W', there are only one-half that number. The wheel W controls the supply of current to the press-magnet, and the wheel W' to the type-magnet. The type-magnet advances the letter and figure wheels one step when the magnet is energized, and a succeeding step when the circuit is broken. Hence, the metallic contact surfaces on wheel W' are, as stated, only half as many as on the wheel W, which controls the press-magnet.
In the sketch (Fig. 2), you can see two wheels mounted on the cylinder shaft, made of metal segments that are insulated from one another. On the hubs of these wheels are two brushes that connect to the main battery. There are two brushes resting on the edges of these segmental wheels, which are connected to the wires carrying the battery current to the type-magnet and press-magnet, respectively, as the brushes make contact with the metal segments. It's important to note that there are as many pins on the cylinder as there are characters on the ticker's type-wheels, and one of the segmental wheels, W, has the same number of metal segments, while the other wheel, W', has only half that number. The wheel W controls the current supply to the press-magnet, and the wheel W' controls the type-magnet. The type-magnet advances the letter and figure wheels one step when energized, and an additional step when the circuit is broken. Therefore, the metal contact surfaces on wheel W' are, as mentioned, only half as many as those on wheel W, which controls the press-magnet.
It should be borne in mind, however, that the contact surfaces and insulated surfaces on wheel W' are together equal in number to the characters on the type-wheels, but the retractile spring of TM does half the work of operating the escapement. On the other hand, the wheel W has the full number of contact surfaces, because it must provide for the operative closure of the press-magnet circuit whether the brush B' is in engagement with a metallic segment or an insulated segment of the wheel W'. As the cylinder revolves, the wheels are carried around with its shaft and current impulses flow through the wires to the magnets as the brushes make contact with the metallic segments of these wheels.
It should be noted, however, that the contact surfaces and insulated surfaces on wheel W' are equal in number to the characters on the type-wheels, but the retractable spring of TM does half the work of operating the escapement. On the other hand, wheel W has the full number of contact surfaces since it must ensure the proper closure of the press-magnet circuit whether brush B' is connecting with a metallic segment or an insulated segment of wheel W'. As the cylinder rotates, the wheels move along with its shaft, and current impulses flow through the wires to the magnets as the brushes make contact with the metallic segments of these wheels.
One example will be sufficient to convey to the reader an idea of the operation of the apparatus. Assuming, for instance, that it is desired to send out the letters AM to the printer, let us suppose that the pin corresponding to the letter A is at one end of the cylinder and near the upper part of its periphery, and that the letter M is about the centre of the cylinder and near the lower part of its periphery. The operator at the keyboard would depress the letter A, whereupon the cylinder would in its revolution bring the first-named pin against the key. During the rotation of the cylinder a current would pass through wheel W' and actuate TM, drawing down the armature and operating the escapement, which would bring the type-wheel to a point where the letter A would be central as regards the paper tape When the cylinder came to rest, current would flow through the brush of wheel W to PM, and its armature would be attracted, causing the platen to be lifted and thus bringing the paper tape in contact with the type-wheel and printing the letter A. The operator next sends the letter M by depressing the appropriate key. On account of the position of the corresponding pin, the cylinder would make nearly half a revolution before bringing the pin to the key. During this half revolution the segmental wheels have also been turning, and the brushes have transmitted a number of current impulses to TM, which have caused it to operate the escapement a corresponding number of times, thus turning the type-wheels around to the letter M. When the cylinder stops, current once more goes to the press-magnet, and the operation of lifting and printing is repeated. As a matter of fact, current flows over both circuits as the cylinder is rotated, but the press-magnet is purposely made to be comparatively "sluggish" and the narrowness of the segments on wheel W tends to diminish the flow of current in the press circuit until the cylinder comes to rest, when the current continuously flows over that circuit without interruption and fully energizes the press-magnet. The shifting of the type-wheels is brought about as follows: On the keyboard of the transmitter there are two characters known as "dots"—namely, the letter dot and the figure dot. If the operator presses one of these dot keys, it is engaged by an appropriate pin on the revolving cylinder. Meanwhile the type-wheels are rotating, carrying with them the rocking-lever, and current is pulsating over both circuits. When the type-wheels have arrived at the proper point the rocking-lever has been carried to a position where its lower arm is directly over one of the pins on the arm extending from the platen of the press-lever. The cylinder stops, and current operates the sluggish press-magnet, causing its armature to be attracted, thus lifting the platen and its projecting arm. As the arm lifts upward, the pin moves along the under side of the lower arm of the rocking-lever, thus causing it to cant and shift the type-wheels to the right or left, as desired. The principles of operation of this apparatus have been confined to a very brief and general description, but it is believed to be sufficient for the scope of this article.
One example will be enough to give the reader an understanding of how the device works. Let’s say we want to send the letters AM to the printer. We can imagine that the pin for the letter A is at one end of the cylinder, close to the top edge, while the letter M is roughly in the middle of the cylinder, near the bottom edge. The operator at the keyboard would press the key for letter A, causing the cylinder to rotate and bring the pin for A against the key. As the cylinder turns, a current flows through wheel W' and activates TM, pulling down the armature and operating the escapement, which positions the type-wheel so that letter A is centered on the paper tape. When the cylinder stops, current flows through the brush of wheel W to PM, attracting its armature, lifting the platen, and bringing the paper tape in contact with the type-wheel to print the letter A. Next, the operator sends the letter M by pressing the corresponding key. Because of M's pin position, the cylinder will rotate almost half a turn before bringing the pin to the key. During this half rotation, the segmental wheels also turn, and the brushes send several current impulses to TM, causing it to operate the escapement multiple times, turning the type-wheels to the letter M. Once the cylinder stops, current flows again to the press-magnet, repeating the lifting and printing process. In fact, current flows through both circuits as the cylinder rotates, but the press-magnet is intentionally designed to be somewhat "sluggish," and the narrowness of the segments on wheel W reduces current flow in the press circuit until the cylinder stops, allowing continuous current to fully energize the press-magnet. The type-wheels shift as follows: On the keyboard of the transmitter, there are two characters called "dots" — the letter dot and the figure dot. When the operator presses one of these dot keys, it gets engaged by the appropriate pin on the revolving cylinder. At the same time, the type-wheels are turning, along with the rocking-lever, and current is pulsating through both circuits. When the type-wheels reach the right position, the rocking-lever moves to where its lower arm is situated directly above one of the pins on the arm extending from the platen of the press-lever. The cylinder then stops, and current works the sluggish press-magnet, attracting its armature, which lifts the platen and its projecting arm. As the arm rises, the pin moves along the underside of the lower arm of the rocking-lever, causing it to tilt and shift the type-wheels right or left as needed. The principles of operation for this device have been briefly and generally described, but it is considered enough for the purpose of this article.
NOTE.—The illustrations in this article are reproduced from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr., by permission of Maver Publishing Company, New York.
NOTE.—The illustrations in this article are taken from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr., with the permission of Maver Publishing Company, New York.
II. THE QUADRUPLEX AND PHONOPLEX
EDISON'S work in stock printers and telegraphy had marked him as a rising man in the electrical art of the period but his invention of quadruplex telegraphy in 1874 was what brought him very prominently before the notice of the public. Duplex telegraphy, or the sending of two separate messages in opposite directions at the same time over one line was known and practiced previous to this time, but quadruplex telegraphy, or the simultaneous sending of four separate messages, two in each direction, over a single line had not been successfully accomplished, although it had been the subject of many an inventor's dream and the object of anxious efforts for many long years.
EDISON's work with stock printers and telegraphy had established him as a rising star in the electrical field at the time, but his invention of quadruplex telegraphy in 1874 is what truly brought him into the public eye. Duplex telegraphy—sending two separate messages in opposite directions at the same time over one line—was known and used before this, but quadruplex telegraphy—simultaneously sending four separate messages, two in each direction, over a single line—had never been successfully achieved, despite being a long-standing dream for many inventors and the focus of intense efforts for many years.
In the early part of 1873, and for some time afterward, the system invented by Joseph Stearns was the duplex in practical use. In April of that year, however, Edison took up the study of the subject and filed two applications for patents. One of these applications [23] embraced an invention by which two messages could be sent not only duplex, or in opposite directions as above explained, but could also be sent "diplex"—that is to say, in one direction, simultaneously, as separate and distinct messages, over the one line. Thus there was introduced a new feature into the art of multiplex telegraphy, for, whereas duplexing (accomplished by varying the strength of the current) permitted messages to be sent simultaneously from opposite stations, diplexing (achieved by also varying the direction of the current) permitted the simultaneous transmission of two messages from the same station and their separate reception at the distant station.
In early 1873, and for a while afterwards, Joseph Stearns’ duplex system was the standard in use. However, in April of that year, Edison began studying the topic and filed two patent applications. One of these applications [23] included an invention allowing two messages to be sent not only duplex, or in opposite directions as previously described, but also "diplex"—meaning two separate and distinct messages could be sent simultaneously in one direction over a single line. This introduced a new element to the field of multiplex telegraphy, since duplexing (achieved by varying the current strength) enabled simultaneous message transmission from opposite stations, while diplexing (also varying the current direction) allowed for the simultaneous transmission of two messages from the same station and their distinct reception at the remote station.
[Footnote 23: Afterward issued as Patent No. 162,633, April 27, 1875.]
[Footnote 23: Later released as Patent No. 162,633, April 27, 1875.]
The quadruplex was the tempting goal toward which Edison now constantly turned, and after more than a year's strenuous work he filed a number of applications for patents in the late summer of 1874. Among them was one which was issued some years afterward as Patent No. 480,567, covering his well-known quadruplex. He had improved his own diplex, combined it with the Stearns duplex and thereby produced a system by means of which four messages could be sent over a single line at the same time, two in each direction.
The quadruplex became the alluring target that Edison relentlessly pursued, and after over a year's hard work, he filed several patent applications in the late summer of 1874. One of these was later granted as Patent No. 480,567, which covered his famous quadruplex. He enhanced his own diplex, merged it with the Stearns duplex, and created a system that allowed four messages to be transmitted over a single line simultaneously, two in each direction.
As the reader will probably be interested to learn something of the theoretical principles of this fascinating invention, we shall endeavor to offer a brief and condensed explanation thereof with as little technicality as the subject will permit. This explanation will necessarily be of somewhat elementary character for the benefit of the lay reader, whose indulgence is asked for an occasional reiteration introduced for the sake of clearness of comprehension. While the apparatus and the circuits are seemingly very intricate, the principles are really quite simple, and the difficulty of comprehension is more apparent than real if the underlying phenomena are studied attentively.
Since readers will likely want to know about the basic principles behind this fascinating invention, we will do our best to provide a brief and straightforward explanation with as little technical detail as possible. This explanation will be somewhat basic for the lay reader, and we appreciate your patience with any repetition that might enhance understanding. While the machinery and circuits may seem complicated, the underlying principles are actually quite simple, and the challenge in understanding is more about perception than reality if the core concepts are examined carefully.
At the root of all systems of telegraphy, including multiplex systems, there lies the single basic principle upon which their performance depends—namely, the obtaining of a slight mechanical movement at the more or less distant end of a telegraph line. This is accomplished through the utilization of the phenomena of electromagnetism. These phenomena are easy of comprehension and demonstration. If a rod of soft iron be wound around with a number of turns of insulated wire, and a current of electricity be sent through the wire, the rod will be instantly magnetized and will remain a magnet as long as the current flows; but when the current is cut off the magnetic effect instantly ceases. This device is known as an electromagnet, and the charging and discharging of such a magnet may, of course, be repeated indefinitely. Inasmuch as a magnet has the power of attracting to itself pieces of iron or steel, the basic importance of an electromagnet in telegraphy will be at once apparent when we consider the sounder, whose clicks are familiar to every ear. This instrument consists essentially of an electro-magnet of horseshoe form with its two poles close together, and with its armature, a bar of iron, maintained in close proximity to the poles, but kept normally in a retracted position by a spring. When the distant operator presses down his key the circuit is closed and a current passes along the line and through the (generally two) coils of the electromagnet, thus magnetizing the iron core. Its attractive power draws the armature toward the poles. When the operator releases the pressure on his key the circuit is broken, current does not flow, the magnetic effect ceases, and the armature is drawn back by its spring. These movements give rise to the clicking sounds which represent the dots and dashes of the Morse or other alphabet as transmitted by the operator. Similar movements, produced in like manner, are availed of in another instrument known as the relay, whose office is to act practically as an automatic transmitter key, repeating the messages received in its coils, and sending them on to the next section of the line, equipped with its own battery; or, when the message is intended for its own station, sending the message to an adjacent sounder included in a local battery circuit. With a simple circuit, therefore, between two stations and where an intermediate battery is not necessary, a relay is not used.
At the core of all telegraph systems, including multiplex systems, is a single fundamental principle that their operation relies on—specifically, the ability to produce a slight mechanical movement at a more or less distant end of a telegraph line. This is achieved through the use of electromagnetic phenomena, which are easy to understand and demonstrate. If you wrap a soft iron rod with several turns of insulated wire and then send an electric current through the wire, the rod will become magnetized instantly and will stay magnetized as long as the current flows; however, when the current is turned off, the magnetic effect stops immediately. This device is called an electromagnet, and you can charge and discharge it repeatedly without limit. Since a magnet can attract pieces of iron or steel, the critical role of an electromagnet in telegraphy becomes clear when we look at the sounder, whose clicks are recognizable to everyone. This instrument mainly consists of a horseshoe-shaped electromagnet with its two poles close together, along with an iron bar armature that is kept nearby but normally retracted by a spring. When the distant operator presses down on their key, the circuit closes, allowing current to flow along the line and through the (usually two) coils of the electromagnet, magnetizing the iron core. This magnet's attractive force pulls the armature towards the poles. When the operator lets go of the key, the circuit opens, the current stops flowing, the magnetic effect ends, and the spring pulls the armature back. These movements produce the clicking sounds that represent the dots and dashes of the Morse code or other alphabets as sent by the operator. Similar movements are also used in another device called the relay, which acts nearly like an automatic transmitter key, repeating the messages received in its coils and sending them to the next section of the line, equipped with its own battery; or, if the message is meant for its own station, it sends the message to a nearby sounder in a local battery circuit. Therefore, in a simple circuit between two stations where an intermediate battery isn’t needed, a relay is not used.
Passing on to the consideration of another phase of the phenomena of electromagnetism, the reader's attention is called to Fig. 1, in which will be seen on the left a simple form of electromagnet consisting of a bar of soft iron wound around with insulated wire, through which a current is flowing from a battery. The arrows indicate the direction of flow.
Moving on to the next aspect of electromagnetism, take a look at Fig. 1, where you'll see on the left a basic type of electromagnet made up of a bar of soft iron wrapped with insulated wire, through which a current is flowing from a battery. The arrows show the direction of the flow.
All magnets have two poles, north and south. A permanent magnet (made of steel, which, as distinguished from soft iron, retains its magnetism for long periods) is so called because it is permanently magnetized and its polarity remains fixed. In an electromagnet the magnetism exists only as long as current is flowing through the wire, and the polarity of the soft-iron bar is determined by the DIRECTION of flow of current around it for the time being. If the direction is reversed, the polarity will also be reversed. Assuming, for instance, the bar to be end-on toward the observer, that end will be a south pole if the current is flowing from left to right, clockwise, around the bar; or a north pole if flowing in the other direction, as illustrated at the right of the figure. It is immaterial which way the wire is wound around the bar, the determining factor of polarity being the DIRECTION of the current. It will be clear, therefore, that if two EQUAL currents be passed around a bar in opposite directions (Fig. 3) they will tend to produce exactly opposite polarities and thus neutralize each other. Hence, the bar would remain non-magnetic.
All magnets have two poles: north and south. A permanent magnet (made of steel, which, unlike soft iron, keeps its magnetism for a long time) is called permanent because it stays magnetized and its polarity is fixed. In an electromagnet, the magnetism only exists while current is flowing through the wire, and the polarity of the soft-iron bar depends on the direction of the current around it at that moment. If the direction is switched, the polarity will also change. For example, if the bar is facing the observer and the current flows from left to right in a clockwise direction around the bar, that end will be a south pole; if the current flows in the opposite direction, it will be a north pole, as shown on the right of the figure. It doesn’t matter how the wire is wound around the bar; the key factor for determining polarity is the current's direction. Therefore, if two equal currents are passed around the bar in opposite directions (Fig. 3), they will create exactly opposite polarities and effectively cancel each other out. As a result, the bar will remain non-magnetic.
As the path to the quadruplex passes through the duplex, let us consider the Stearns system, after noting one other principle—namely, that if more than one path is presented in which an electric current may complete its circuit, it divides in proportion to the resistance of each path. Hence, if we connect one pole of a battery with the earth, and from the other pole run to the earth two wires of equal resistance as illustrated in Fig. 2, equal currents will traverse the wires.
As the route to the quadruplex goes through the duplex, let’s look at the Stearns system, while also keeping in mind one more principle — that if there are multiple paths for an electric current to complete its circuit, it divides based on the resistance of each path. So, if we connect one terminal of a battery to the ground and from the other terminal extend two wires of equal resistance to the ground, as shown in Fig. 2, equal currents will flow through the wires.
The above principles were employed in the Stearns differential duplex system in the following manner: Referring to Fig. 3, suppose a wire, A, is led from a battery around a bar of soft iron from left to right, and another wire of equal resistance and equal number of turns, B, around from right to left. The flow of current will cause two equal opposing actions to be set up in the bar; one will exactly offset the other, and no magnetic effect will be produced. A relay thus wound is known as a differential relay—more generally called a neutral relay.
The above principles were used in the Stearns differential duplex system like this: Referring to Fig. 3, imagine a wire, A, running from a battery around a soft iron bar from left to right, and another wire of the same resistance and equal number of turns, B, running from right to left. The current flow will create two equal opposing forces in the bar; one will completely counteract the other, resulting in no magnetic effect. A relay wound this way is called a differential relay—commonly known as a neutral relay.
The non-technical reader may wonder what use can possibly be made of an apparently non-operative piece of apparatus. It must be borne in mind, however, in considering a duplex system, that a differential relay is used AT EACH END of the line and forms part of the circuit; and that while each relay must be absolutely unresponsive to the signals SENT OUT FROM ITS HOME OFFICE, it must respond to signals transmitted by a DISTANT OFFICE. Hence, the next figure (4), with its accompanying explanation, will probably make the matter clear. If another battery, D, be introduced at the distant end of the wire A the differential or neutral relay becomes actively operative as follows: Battery C supplies wires A and B with an equal current, but battery D doubles the strength of the current traversing wire A. This is sufficient to not only neutralize the magnetism which the current in wire B would tend to set up, but also—by reason of the excess of current in wire A—to make the bar a magnet whose polarity would be determined by the direction of the flow of current around it.
The casual reader might wonder what purpose an apparently non-functional piece of equipment could serve. However, when thinking about a duplex system, it's important to remember that a differential relay is used at each end of the line and is part of the circuit. Each relay must completely ignore the signals sent from its home office but respond to signals coming from a distant office. Therefore, the next figure (4), along with its explanation, will likely clarify things. If another battery, D, is added at the distant end of wire A, the differential or neutral relay becomes actively functional as follows: Battery C provides wires A and B with an equal current, but battery D increases the current flowing through wire A. This is enough to not only cancel out the magnetism that the current in wire B would create but also—due to the extra current in wire A—transform the bar into a magnet whose polarity is determined by the direction of the current flow around it.
In the arrangement shown in Fig. 4 the batteries are so connected that current flow is in the same direction, thus doubling the amount of current flowing through wire A. But suppose the batteries were so connected that the current from each set flowed in an opposite direction? The result would be that these currents would oppose and neutralize each other, and, therefore, none would flow in wire A. Inasmuch, however, as there is nothing to hinder, current would flow from battery C through wire B, and the bar would therefore be magnetized. Hence, assuming that the relay is to be actuated from the distant end, D, it is in a sense immaterial whether the batteries connected with wire A assist or oppose each other, as, in either case, the bar would be magnetized only through the operation of the distant key.
In the setup shown in Fig. 4, the batteries are connected so that the current flows in the same direction, which effectively doubles the current flowing through wire A. But what if the batteries were connected so that the current from each set flowed in opposite directions? In that case, these currents would cancel each other out, resulting in no current flowing through wire A. However, since nothing is blocking the path, current would still flow from battery C through wire B, magnetizing the bar. Therefore, assuming the relay is triggered from the far end, D, it doesn’t really matter whether the batteries connected to wire A work together or against each other, since in both scenarios, the bar would only be magnetized through the action of the distant key.
A slight elaboration of Fig. 4 will further illustrate the principle of the differential duplex. In Fig. 5 are two stations, A the home end, and B the distant station to which a message is to be sent. The relay at each end has two coils, 1 and 2, No. 1 in each case being known as the "main-line coil" and 2 as the "artificial-line coil." The latter, in each case, has in its circuit a resistance, R, to compensate for the resistance of the main line, so that there shall be no inequalities in the circuits. The artificial line, as well as that to which the two coils are joined, are connected to earth. There is a battery, C, and a key, K. When the key is depressed, current flows through the relay coils at A, but no magnetism is produced, as they oppose each other. The current, however, flows out through the main-line coil over the line and through the main-line coil 1 at B, completing its circuit to earth and magnetizing the bar of the relay, thus causing its armature to be attracted. On releasing the key the circuit is broken and magnetism instantly ceases.
A slight elaboration of Fig. 4 will further illustrate the principle of the differential duplex. In Fig. 5 are two stations, A the home end, and B the distant station to which a message is to be sent. The relay at each end has two coils, 1 and 2, with No. 1 in each case known as the "main-line coil" and 2 as the "artificial-line coil." The latter has a resistance, R, in its circuit to balance out the resistance of the main line, ensuring there are no differences in the circuits. The artificial line, along with the two coils, is connected to ground. There is a battery, C, and a key, K. When the key is pressed, current flows through the relay coils at A, but no magnetism is generated because they cancel each other out. However, the current flows out through the main-line coil over the line and through the main-line coil 1 at B, completing its circuit to ground and magnetizing the relay bar, causing its armature to be attracted. When the key is released, the circuit is broken, and the magnetism immediately stops.
It will be evident, therefore, that the operator at A may cause the relay at B to act without affecting his own relay. Similar effects would be produced from B to A if the battery and key were placed at the B end.
It will be clear, then, that the operator at A can trigger the relay at B without influencing his own relay. The same results would occur from B to A if the battery and key were positioned at the B end.
If, therefore, like instruments are placed at each end of the line, as in Fig. 6, we have a differential duplex arrangement by means of which two operators may actuate relays at the ends distant from them, without causing the operation of the relays at their home ends. In practice this is done by means of a special instrument known as a continuity preserving transmitter, or, usually, as a transmitter. This consists of an electromagnet, T, operated by a key, K, and separate battery. The armature lever, L, is long, pivoted in the centre, and is bent over at the end. At a point a little beyond its centre is a small piece of insulating material to which is screwed a strip of spring metal, S. Conveniently placed with reference to the end of the lever is a bent metallic piece, P, having a contact screw in its upper horizontal arm, and attached to the lower end of this bent piece is a post, or standard, to which the main battery is electrically connected. The relay coils are connected by wire to the spring piece, S, and the armature lever is connected to earth. If the key is depressed, the armature is attracted and its bent end is moved upward, depressing the spring which makes contact with the upper screw, which places the battery to the line, and simultaneously breaks the ground connection between the spring and the upturned end of the lever, as shown at the left. When the key is released the battery is again connected to earth. The compensating resistances and condensers necessary for a duplex arrangement are shown in the diagram.
If, therefore, similar devices are positioned at each end of the line, as shown in Fig. 6, we have a differential duplex setup that allows two operators to activate relays at the ends far from them without triggering the relays at their own ends. In practice, this is accomplished using a special device known as a continuity preserving transmitter, or simply a transmitter. This device includes an electromagnet, T, activated by a key, K, and a separate battery. The armature lever, L, is long, pivoted in the center, and bent at the end. Just past its center is a small piece of insulating material to which a strip of spring metal, S, is attached. Conveniently placed near the end of the lever is a bent metal piece, P, with a contact screw in its upper horizontal arm; attached to the bottom of this bent piece is a post that connects to the main battery. The relay coils are wired to the spring piece, S, and the armature lever is grounded. When the key is pressed, the armature is drawn in, and its bent end moves upward, compressing the spring that contacts the upper screw, connecting the battery to the line while simultaneously breaking the ground connection between the spring and the upward end of the lever, as illustrated on the left. When the key is released, the battery reconnects to ground. The compensating resistances and capacitors needed for a duplex setup are depicted in the diagram.
In Fig. 6 one transmitter is shown as closed, at A, while the other one is open. From our previous illustrations and explanations it will be readily seen that, with the transmitter closed at station A, current flows via post P, through S, and to both relay coils at A, thence over the main line to main-line coil at B, and down to earth through S and the armature lever with its grounded wire. The relay at A would be unresponsive, but the core of the relay at B would be magnetized and its armature respond to signals from A. In like manner, if the transmitter at B be closed, current would flow through similar parts and thus cause the relay at A to respond. If both transmitters be closed simultaneously, both batteries will be placed to the line, which would practically result in doubling the current in each of the main-line coils, in consequence of which both relays are energized and their armatures attracted through the operation of the keys at the distant ends. Hence, two messages can be sent in opposite directions over the same line simultaneously.
In Fig. 6, one transmitter is shown as closed at A, while the other one is open. From our earlier illustrations and explanations, it's clear that with the transmitter closed at station A, current flows through post P, through S, and to both relay coils at A, then over the main line to the main-line coil at B, and down to the ground through S and the armature lever with its grounded wire. The relay at A would not respond, but the core of the relay at B would be magnetized, causing its armature to react to signals from A. Similarly, if the transmitter at B is closed, current would flow through the same components, causing the relay at A to respond. If both transmitters are closed at the same time, both batteries connect to the line, effectively doubling the current in each main-line coil, which means both relays are energized and their armatures are attracted through the operation of the keys at the distant ends. Therefore, two messages can be sent in opposite directions over the same line at the same time.
The reader will undoubtedly see quite clearly from the above system, which rests upon varying the STRENGTH of the current, that two messages could not be sent in the same direction over the one line at the same time. To accomplish this object Edison introduced another and distinct feature—namely, the using of the same current, but ALSO varying its DIRECTION of flow; that is to say, alternately reversing the POLARITY of the batteries as applied to the line and thus producing corresponding changes in the polarity of another specially constructed type of relay, called a polarized relay. To afford the reader a clear conception of such a relay we would refer again to Fig. 1 and its explanation, from which it appears that the polarity of a soft-iron bar is determined not by the strength of the current flowing around it but by the direction thereof.
The reader will clearly understand from the system described above, which varies the strength of the current, that two messages cannot be sent in the same direction over a single line at the same time. To solve this issue, Edison introduced another distinct feature—using the same current while also varying its direction. This means alternately reversing the polarity of the batteries connected to the line, thus creating corresponding changes in the polarity of a specially designed type of relay called a polarized relay. To give the reader a clear idea of how such a relay works, we refer again to Fig. 1 and its explanation, which shows that the polarity of a soft-iron bar is determined not by the strength of the current flowing around it but by its direction.
With this idea clearly in mind, the theory of the polarized relay, generally called "polar" relay, as presented in the diagram (Fig. 7), will be readily understood.
With this idea in mind, the theory of the polarized relay, commonly known as "polar" relay, as shown in the diagram (Fig. 7), will be easy to understand.
A is a bar of soft iron, bent as shown, and wound around with insulated copper wire, the ends of which are connected with a battery, B, thus forming an electromagnet. An essential part of this relay consists of a swinging PERMANENT magnet, C, whose polarity remains fixed, that end between the terminals of the electromagnet being a north pole. Inasmuch as unlike poles of magnets are attracted to each other and like poles repelled, it follows that this north pole will be repelled by the north pole of the electromagnet, but will swing over and be attracted by its south pole. If the direction of flow of current be reversed, by reversing the battery, the electromagnetic polarity also reverses and the end of the permanent magnet swings over to the other side. This is shown in the two figures of Fig. 7. This device being a relay, its purpose is to repeat transmitted signals into a local circuit, as before explained. For this purpose there are provided at D and E a contact and a back stop, the former of which is opened and closed by the swinging permanent magnet, thus opening and closing the local circuit.
A is a piece of soft iron that's bent as shown and wrapped with insulated copper wire. The ends of the wire are connected to a battery, B, creating an electromagnet. A key part of this relay is a swinging permanent magnet, C, whose polarity stays fixed, with the end between the electromagnet's terminals being a north pole. Since opposite poles of magnets attract each other while like poles repel each other, the north pole will be pushed away by the electromagnet’s north pole but will swing over and be drawn to its south pole. If the current direction is reversed by switching the battery, the electromagnetic polarity changes as well, causing the end of the permanent magnet to swing to the other side. This is illustrated in the two figures in Fig. 7. As this device is a relay, its function is to repeat transmitted signals into a local circuit, as previously explained. For this purpose, there are contact and a backstop at D and E, with the former being opened and closed by the swinging permanent magnet, thereby opening and closing the local circuit.
Manifestly there must be provided some convenient way for rapidly transposing the direction of the current flow if such a device as the polar relay is to be used for the reception of telegraph messages, and this is accomplished by means of an instrument called a pole-changer, which consists essentially of a movable contact piece connected permanently to the earth, or grounded, and arranged to connect one or the other pole of a battery to the line and simultaneously ground the other pole. This action of the pole-changer is effected by movements of the armature of an electromagnet through the manipulation of an ordinary telegraph key by an operator at the home station, as in the operation of the "transmitter," above referred to.
Clearly, there needs to be an easy way to quickly switch the direction of the current flow if we're going to use a device like the polar relay for getting telegraph messages. This is done with an instrument called a pole-changer, which basically has a movable contact piece that's permanently connected to the ground and is set up to connect one side of a battery to the line while simultaneously grounding the other side. The pole-changer works by moving the armature of an electromagnet, which is controlled by a regular telegraph key operated by someone at the home station, just like in the operation of the "transmitter" mentioned earlier.
By a combination of the neutral relay and the polar relay two operators, by manipulating two telegraph keys in the ordinary way, can simultaneously send two messages over one line in the SAME direction with the SAME current, one operator varying its strength and the other operator varying its polarity or direction of flow. This principle was covered by Edison's Patent No. 162,633, and was known as the "diplex" system, although, in the patent referred to, Edison showed and claimed the adaptation of the principle to duplex telegraphy. Indeed, as a matter of fact, it was found that by winding the polar relay differentially and arranging the circuits and collateral appliances appropriately, the polar duplex system was more highly efficient than the neutral system, and it is extensively used to the present day.
By using both the neutral relay and the polar relay, two operators can simultaneously send two messages in the same direction over one line using the same current, simply by manipulating two telegraph keys as usual. One operator adjusts the current strength while the other operator changes its polarity or flow direction. This principle was described in Edison’s Patent No. 162,633 and was referred to as the "diplex" system, although Edison demonstrated and claimed how this principle could be adapted for duplex telegraphy in the patent. In fact, it was discovered that by winding the polar relay differentially and setting up the circuits and additional equipment correctly, the polar duplex system was more effective than the neutral system, and it continues to be widely used today.
Thus far we have referred to two systems, one the neutral or differential duplex, and the other the combination of the neutral and polar relays, making a diplex system. By one of these two systems a single wire could be used for sending two messages in opposite directions, and by the other in the same direction or in opposite directions. Edison followed up his work on the diplex and combined the two systems into the quadruplex, by means of which FOUR messages could be sent and received simultaneously over the one wire, two in each direction, thus employing eight operators—four at each end—two sending and two receiving. The general principles of quadruplex telegraphy are based upon the phenomena which we have briefly outlined in connection with the neutral relay and the polar relay. The equipment of such a system at each end of the line consists of these two instruments, together with the special form of transmitter and the pole-changer and their keys for actuating the neutral and polar relays at the other, or distant, end. Besides these there are the compensating resistances and condensers. All of these will be seen in the diagram (Fig. 8). It will be understood, of course, that the polar relay, as used in the quadruplex system, is wound differentially, and therefore its operation is somewhat similar in principle to that of the differentially wound neutral relay, in that it does not respond to the operation of the key at the home office, but only operates in response to the movements of the distant key.
So far, we’ve talked about two systems: one is the neutral or differential duplex and the other is a combination of the neutral and polar relays, creating a diplex system. Using one of these systems, a single wire can send two messages in opposite directions, and with the other, messages can be sent in the same or opposite directions. Edison built on his diplex work and combined both systems into the quadruplex, which allows four messages to be sent and received simultaneously over one wire—two in each direction—utilizing eight operators, with four at each end—two sending and two receiving. The main principles of quadruplex telegraphy are based on the concepts we've briefly discussed with the neutral and polar relays. The equipment for this system at each end consists of these two instruments, along with a specific type of transmitter, a pole-changer, and their keys to control the neutral and polar relays at the other end. Additionally, there are compensating resistances and condensers. All of this is illustrated in the diagram (Fig. 8). It’s important to note that the polar relay, as used in the quadruplex system, is wired differentially, so its operation is somewhat similar to that of the differentially wound neutral relay, meaning it doesn't respond to the key operation at the home office, but rather activates in response to the movements of the distant key.
Our explanation has merely aimed to show the underlying phenomena and principles in broad outline without entering into more detail than was deemed absolutely necessary. It should be stated, however, that between the outline and the filling in of the details there was an enormous amount of hard work, study, patient plodding, and endless experiments before Edison finally perfected his quadruplex system in the year 1874.
Our explanation has simply tried to outline the basic phenomena and principles without getting into more detail than absolutely necessary. However, it should be mentioned that a tremendous amount of hard work, study, perseverance, and countless experiments went into perfecting Edison's quadruplex system in 1874.
If it were attempted to offer here a detailed explanation of the varied and numerous operations of the quadruplex, this article would assume the proportions of a treatise. An idea of their complexity may be gathered from the following, which is quoted from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr.:
If we tried to provide a detailed explanation of the various operations of the quadruplex, this article would end up being as long as a book. You can get an idea of their complexity from the following quote from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr.:
"It may well be doubted whether in the whole range of applied electricity there occur such beautiful combinations, so quickly made, broken up, and others reformed, as in the operation of the Edison quadruplex. For example, it is quite demonstrable that during the making of a simple dash of the Morse alphabet by the neutral relay at the home station the distant pole-changer may reverse its battery several times; the home pole-changer may do likewise, and the home transmitter may increase and decrease the electromotive force of the home battery repeatedly. Simultaneously, and, of course, as a consequence of the foregoing actions, the home neutral relay itself may have had its magnetism reversed several times, and the SIGNAL, that is, the dash, will have been made, partly by the home battery, partly by the distant and home batteries combined, partly by current on the main line, partly by current on the artificial line, partly by the main-line 'static' current, partly by the condenser static current, and yet, on a well-adjusted circuit the dash will have been produced on the quadruplex sounder as clearly as any dash on an ordinary single-wire sounder."
"It can be questioned whether there are any combinations in applied electricity as beautiful, quickly created, broken apart, and then reformed as those seen in the operation of the Edison quadruplex. For instance, it’s easy to demonstrate that while a simple dash of the Morse alphabet is made by the neutral relay at the home station, the distant pole-changer can reverse its battery multiple times; the home pole-changer can do the same, and the home transmitter can increase and decrease the electromotive force of the home battery repeatedly. At the same time, and as a result of these actions, the home neutral relay itself may have its magnetism reversed several times, and the SIGNAL, or the dash, will have been created partly by the home battery, partly by the distant and home batteries combined, partly by current on the main line, partly by current on the artificial line, partly by the main-line 'static' current, partly by the condenser static current, and yet, in a well-adjusted circuit, the dash will have been produced on the quadruplex sounder as clearly as any dash on an ordinary single-wire sounder."
We present a diagrammatic illustration of the Edison quadruplex, battery key system, in Fig. 8, and refer the reader to the above or other text-books if he desires to make a close study of its intricate operations. Before finally dismissing the quadruplex, and for the benefit of the inquiring reader who may vainly puzzle over the intricacies of the circuits shown in Fig. 8, a hint as to an essential difference between the neutral relay, as used in the duplex and as used in the quadruplex, may be given. With the duplex, as we have seen, the current on the main line is changed in strength only when both keys at OPPOSITE stations are closed together, so that a current due to both batteries flows over the main line. When a single message is sent from one station to the other, or when both stations are sending messages that do not conflict, only one battery or the other is connected to the main line; but with the quadruplex, suppose one of the operators, in New York for instance, is sending reversals of current to Chicago; we can readily see how these changes in polarity will operate the polar relay at the distant station, but why will they not also operate the neutral relay at the distant station as well? This difficulty was solved by dividing the battery at each station into two unequal parts, the smaller battery being always in circuit with the pole-changer ready to have its polarity reversed on the main line to operate the distant polar relay, but the spring retracting the armature of the neutral relay is made so stiff as to resist these weak currents. If, however, the transmitter is operated at the same end, the entire battery is connected to the main line, and the strength of this current is sufficient to operate the neutral relay. Whether the part or all the battery is alternately connected to or disconnected from the main line by the transmitter, the current so varied in strength is subject to reversal of polarity by the pole-changer; but the variations in strength have no effect upon the distant polar relay, because that relay being responsive to changes in polarity of a weak current is obviously responsive to corresponding changes in polarity of a powerful current. With this distinction before him, the reader will have no difficulty in following the circuits of Fig. 8, bearing always in mind that by reason of the differential winding of the polar and neutral relays, neither of the relays at one station will respond to the home battery, and can only respond to the distant battery—the polar relay responding when the polarity of the current is reversed, whether the current be strong or weak, and the neutral relay responding when the line-current is increased, regardless of its polarity. It should be added that besides the system illustrated in Fig. 8, which is known as the differential principle, the quadruplex was also arranged to operate on the Wheatstone bridge principle; but it is not deemed necessary to enter into its details. The underlying phenomena were similar, the difference consisting largely in the arrangement of the circuits and apparatus. [24]
We present a diagram of the Edison quadruplex battery key system in Fig. 8, and we suggest that readers refer to the texts mentioned above or other textbooks if they want to closely study its complex operations. Before we conclude our discussion on the quadruplex, and for those curious readers who may struggle to understand the complexities of the circuits shown in Fig. 8, we can point out a key difference between the neutral relay used in the duplex system and the one used in the quadruplex. In the duplex system, as we’ve seen, the current on the main line only increases when both keys at opposite stations are closed, allowing current from both batteries to flow over the main line. When a single message is sent from one station to another, or when both stations are sending non-conflicting messages, only one battery is connected to the main line; however, in the quadruplex setup, if one operator in New York is sending reversals of current to Chicago, it’s clear how these changes in polarity will operate the polar relay at the distant station, but why don’t they also activate the neutral relay there? This issue was resolved by splitting the battery at each station into two uneven parts, with the smaller battery always connected to the pole-changer, prepared to have its polarity reversed on the main line to operate the distant polar relay. In contrast, the spring that retracts the armature of the neutral relay is made stiff enough to resist these weak currents. If the transmitter operates at the same end, the entire battery is connected to the main line, and this current strength is enough to activate the neutral relay. Whether part or all of the battery is alternately connected to or disconnected from the main line by the transmitter, the varying current strength can be reversed in polarity by the pole-changer; however, changes in strength do not impact the distant polar relay because that relay, which responds to changes in polarity of a weak current, will equally respond to corresponding changes in polarity of a strong current. With this distinction in mind, readers will easily follow the circuits in Fig. 8, always remembering that due to the differential winding of the polar and neutral relays, neither relay at one station responds to the home battery and can only respond to the distant battery—where the polar relay reacts when the current's polarity is reversed, regardless of current strength, while the neutral relay reacts when the line current increases, irrespective of its polarity. Additionally, besides the system illustrated in Fig. 8, known as the differential principle, the quadruplex was also set up to work on the Wheatstone bridge principle; however, discussing its details isn’t necessary here. The fundamental phenomena were similar, with the main differences lying in the arrangement of the circuits and equipment. [24]
[Footnote 24: Many of the illustrations in this article are reproduced from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr., by permission of Maver Publishing Company, New York.]
[Footnote 24: Many of the illustrations in this article are reproduced from American Telegraphy and Encyclopedia of the Telegraph, by William Maver, Jr., with permission from Maver Publishing Company, New York.]
Edison made another notable contribution to multiplex telegraphy some years later in the Phonoplex. The name suggests the use of the telephone, and such indeed is the case. The necessity for this invention arose out of the problem of increasing the capacity of telegraph lines employed in "through" and "way" service, such as upon railroads. In a railroad system there are usually two terminal stations and a number of way stations. There is naturally much intercommunication, which would be greatly curtailed by a system having the capacity of only a single message at a time. The duplexes above described could not be used on a railroad telegraph system, because of the necessity of electrically balancing the line, which, while entirely feasible on a through line, would not be practicable between a number of intercommunicating points. Edison's phonoplex normally doubled the capacity of telegraph lines, whether employed on way business or through traffic, but in actual practice made it possible to obtain more than double service. It has been in practical use for many years on some of the leading railroads of the United States.
Edison made another important contribution to multiplex telegraphy a few years later with the Phonoplex. The name suggests the use of the telephone, and that is indeed the case. This invention was needed to solve the problem of increasing the capacity of telegraph lines used in "through" and "way" service, like those found on railroads. In a railroad system, there are typically two terminal stations and several way stations. There’s naturally a lot of communication going on, which would be severely limited by a system that could only handle one message at a time. The duplex systems mentioned earlier couldn’t be used on a railroad telegraph system due to the need for electrical balancing of the line, which, while entirely doable on a straight line, would not work well between multiple intercommunicating points. Edison's phonoplex typically doubled the capacity of telegraph lines, whether used for way business or through traffic, but in actual use, it was possible to achieve more than double the service. It has been in practical use for many years on some of the major railroads in the United States.
The system is a combination of telegraphic apparatus and telephone receiver, although in this case the latter instrument is not used in the generally understood manner. It is well known that the diaphragm of a telephone vibrates with the fluctuations of the current energizing the magnet beneath it. If the make and break of the magnetizing current be rapid, the vibrations being within the limits of the human ear, the diaphragm will produce an audible sound; but if the make and break be as slow as with ordinary Morse transmission, the diaphragm will be merely flexed and return to its original form without producing a sound. If, therefore, there be placed in the same circuit a regular telegraph relay and a special telephone, an operator may, by manipulating a key, operate the relay (and its sounder) without producing a sound in the telephone, as the makes and breaks of the key are far below the limit of audibility. But if through the same circuit, by means of another key suitably connected there is sent the rapid changes in current from an induction-coil, it will cause a series of loud clicks in the telephone, corresponding to the signals transmitted; but this current is too weak to affect the telegraph relay. It will be seen, therefore, that this method of duplexing is practiced, not by varying the strength or polarity, but by sending TWO KINDS OF CURRENT over the wire. Thus, two sets of Morse signals can be transmitted by two operators over one line at the same time without interfering with each other, and not only between terminal offices, but also between a terminal office and any intermediate office, or between two intermediate offices alone.
The system is a mix of telegraphic equipment and a phone receiver, although in this case, the phone isn't used in the typical way. It's well understood that the diaphragm of a phone vibrates with the changes in the current energizing the magnet underneath it. If the switching of the magnetizing current is quick, the vibrations will be within the range of human hearing, and the diaphragm will create a sound. However, if the switching is as slow as with regular Morse transmission, the diaphragm will just flex and return to its original shape without making a sound. Therefore, if a standard telegraph relay and a special phone are connected in the same circuit, an operator can manipulate a key to operate the relay (and its sounder) without generating any sound in the phone, as the makes and breaks from the key are well below what can be heard. But if another key is properly connected to send rapid changes in current from an induction coil through the same circuit, it will create a series of loud clicks in the phone, corresponding to the transmitted signals; however, this current isn’t strong enough to impact the telegraph relay. Thus, this method of duplexing operates not by changing the strength or polarity but by sending TWO TYPES OF CURRENT along the wire. This way, two sets of Morse signals can be sent by two operators over one line simultaneously without interfering with each other, and this can happen not only between terminal offices but also between a terminal office and any intermediate office, or between two intermediate offices alone.
III
AUTOMATIC TELEGRAPHY
FROM the year 1848, when a Scotchman, Alexander Bain, first devised a scheme for rapid telegraphy by automatic methods, down to the beginning of the seventies, many other inventors had also applied themselves to the solution of this difficult problem, with only indifferent success. "Cheap telegraphy" being the slogan of the time, Edison became arduously interested in the subject, and at the end of three years of hard work produced an entirely successful system, a public test of which was made on December 11, 1873 when about twelve thousand (12,000) words were transmitted over a single wire from Washington to New York. in twenty-two and one-half minutes. Edison's system was commercially exploited for several years by the Automatic Telegraph Company, as related in the preceding narrative.
FROM the year 1848, when a Scotsman, Alexander Bain, first came up with a plan for fast telegraphy using automatic methods, until the early seventies, many other inventors also worked on solving this challenging issue, with only modest success. "Cheap telegraphy" was the catchphrase of the time, and Edison became very interested in the topic. After three years of hard work, he created a completely successful system, which was publicly tested on December 11, 1873, when around twelve thousand (12,000) words were sent over a single wire from Washington to New York in just twenty-two and a half minutes. Edison's system was commercially utilized for several years by the Automatic Telegraph Company, as mentioned in the previous narrative.
As a premise to an explanation of the principles involved it should be noted that the transmission of telegraph messages by hand at a rate of fifty words per minute is considered a good average speed; hence, the availability of a telegraph line, as thus operated, is limited to this capacity except as it may be multiplied by two with the use of the duplex, or by four, with the quadruplex. Increased rapidity of transmission may, however, be accomplished by automatic methods, by means of which, through the employment of suitable devices, messages may be stamped in or upon a paper tape, transmitted through automatically acting instruments, and be received at distant points in visible characters, upon a similar tape, at a rate twenty or more times greater—a speed far beyond the possibilities of the human hand to transmit or the ear to receive.
As a starting point for explaining the principles involved, it should be noted that sending telegraph messages manually at a rate of fifty words per minute is considered a good average speed. Therefore, the capacity of a telegraph line operated this way is limited to that speed, unless it is increased to double that with duplex technology or quadruple with quadruplex technology. However, faster transmission can be achieved using automatic methods. By employing suitable devices, messages can be imprinted on a paper tape, sent through automated instruments, and received at distant locations in visible characters on a similar tape, at a speed that is twenty times or more faster—a rate far beyond what a person can manually transmit or the human ear can pick up.
In Edison's system of automatic telegraphy a paper tape was perforated with a series of round holes, so arranged and spaced as to represent Morse characters, forming the words of the message to be transmitted. This was done in a special machine of Edison's invention, called a perforator, consisting of a series of punches operated by a bank of keys—typewriter fashion. The paper tape passed over a cylinder, and was kept in regular motion so as to receive the perforations in proper sequence.
In Edison's system of automatic telegraphy, a paper tape was punched with a series of round holes, arranged and spaced to represent Morse characters, forming the words of the message to be sent. This was done using a special machine invented by Edison, called a perforator, which consisted of a series of punches operated by a set of keys, similar to a typewriter. The paper tape moved over a cylinder and was kept in steady motion to ensure the perforations were made in the correct order.
The perforated tape was then placed in the transmitting instrument, the essential parts of which were a metallic drum and a projecting arm carrying two small wheels, which, by means of a spring, were maintained in constant pressure on the drum. The wheels and drum were electrically connected in the line over which the message was to be sent. current being supplied by batteries in the ordinary manner.
The perforated tape was then loaded into the transmitter, which mainly consisted of a metal drum and a projecting arm with two small wheels. These wheels, held in constant pressure against the drum by a spring, were electrically connected to the drum and the line over which the message would be sent, with power supplied by batteries in the usual way.
When the transmitting instrument was in operation, the perforated tape was passed over the drum in continuous, progressive motion. Thus, the paper passed between the drum and the two small wheels, and, as dry paper is a non-conductor, current was prevented from passing until a perforation was reached. As the paper passed along, the wheels dropped into the perforations, making momentary contacts with the drum beneath and causing momentary impulses of current to be transmitted over the line in the same way that they would be produced by the manipulation of the telegraph key, but with much greater rapidity. The perforations being so arranged as to regulate the length of the contact, the result would be the transmission of long and short impulses corresponding with the dots and dashes of the Morse alphabet.
When the transmitting device was in use, the perforated tape was fed over the drum in a smooth, continuous motion. The paper moved between the drum and two small wheels, and since dry paper doesn’t conduct electricity, the current couldn’t flow until it hit a perforation. As the paper advanced, the wheels pressed down into the perforations, creating brief connections with the drum below and sending quick bursts of current down the line, similar to what would happen with the telegraph key, but much faster. The perforations were arranged to control how long the contacts lasted, resulting in the transmission of long and short signals that matched the dots and dashes of Morse code.
The receiving instrument at the other end of the line was constructed upon much the same general lines as the transmitter, consisting of a metallic drum and reels for the paper tape. Instead of the two small contact wheels, however, a projecting arm carried an iron pin or stylus, so arranged that its point would normally impinge upon the periphery of the drum. The iron pin and the drum were respectively connected so as to be in circuit with the transmission line and batteries. As the principle involved in the receiving operation was electrochemical decomposition, the paper tape upon which the incoming message was to be received was moistened with a chemical solution readily decomposable by the electric current. This paper, while still in a damp condition, was passed between the drum and stylus in continuous, progressive motion. When an electrical impulse came over the line from the transmitting end, current passed through the moistened paper from the iron pin, causing chemical decomposition, by reason of which the iron would be attacked and would mark a line on the paper. Such a line would be long or short, according to the duration of the electric impulse. Inasmuch as a succession of such impulses coming over the line owed their origin to the perforations in the transmitting tape, it followed that the resulting marks upon the receiving tape would correspond thereto in their respective lengths. Hence, the transmitted message was received on the tape in visible dots and dashes representing characters of the Morse alphabet.
The receiver at the other end of the line was built similarly to the transmitter, featuring a metal drum and reels for the paper tape. However, instead of two small contact wheels, a projecting arm held an iron pin or stylus, positioned so that its tip would normally touch the edge of the drum. The iron pin and the drum were connected to the transmission line and batteries. The receiving process relied on electrochemical decomposition, so the paper tape that would capture the incoming message was dampened with a chemical solution that could easily break down when exposed to electric current. This paper, while still wet, was fed continuously between the drum and stylus. When an electrical signal came through the line from the transmitter, current flowed through the wet paper from the iron pin, causing chemical decomposition that marked a line on the paper. The length of the line would vary depending on the duration of the electrical signal. Since a series of these signals were produced based on the perforations in the transmitting tape, the marks on the receiving tape would match in length. As a result, the transmitted message was captured on the tape as visible dots and dashes that represented characters of the Morse alphabet.
The system will, perhaps, be better understood by reference to the following diagrammatic sketch of its general principles:
The system might be easier to understand with the following diagram that outlines its main principles:
Some idea of the rapidity of automatic telegraphy may be obtained when we consider the fact that with the use of Edison's system in the early seventies it was common practice to transmit and receive from three to four thousand words a minute over a single line between New York and Philadelphia. This system was exploited through the use of a moderately paid clerical force.
Some idea of the speed of automatic telegraphy can be understood when we think about the fact that with Edison's system in the early 1870s, it was usual to send and receive between three and four thousand words per minute over a single line connecting New York and Philadelphia. This system was run with a moderately paid clerical staff.
In practice, there was employed such a number of perforating machines as the exigencies of business demanded. Each machine was operated by a clerk, who translated the message into telegraphic characters and prepared the transmitting tape by punching the necessary perforations therein. An expert clerk could perforate such a tape at the rate of fifty to sixty words per minute. At the receiving end the tape was taken by other clerks who translated the Morse characters into ordinary words, which were written on message blanks for delivery to persons for whom the messages were intended.
In practice, a number of perforating machines were used based on the business needs. Each machine was operated by a clerk, who converted the message into telegraphic characters and prepared the transmitting tape by punching the required holes. An experienced clerk could perforate a tape at a speed of fifty to sixty words per minute. At the receiving end, other clerks took the tape and decoded the Morse characters into regular words, which they wrote on message forms for delivery to the intended recipients.
This latter operation—"copying." as it was called—was not consistent with truly economical business practice. Edison therefore undertook the task of devising an improved system whereby the message when received would not require translation and rewriting, but would automatically appear on the tape in plain letters and words, ready for instant delivery.
This later operation—"copying," as it was called—was not in line with truly efficient business practices. Edison therefore took on the challenge of creating a better system where the message, once received, wouldn't need to be translated and rewritten, but would automatically show up on the tape in clear letters and words, ready for immediate delivery.
The result was his automatic Roman letter system, the basis for which included the above-named general principles of perforated transmission tape and electrochemical decomposition. Instead of punching Morse characters in the transmission tape however, it was perforated with a series of small round holes forming Roman letters. The verticals of these letters were originally five holes high. The transmitting instrument had five small wheels or rollers, instead of two, for making contacts through the perforations and causing short electric impulses to pass over the lines. At first five lines were used to carry these impulses to the receiving instrument, where there were five iron pins impinging on the drum. By means of these pins the chemically prepared tape was marked with dots corresponding to the impulses as received, leaving upon it a legible record of the letters and words transmitted.
The result was his automatic Roman letter system, which was based on the general principles of perforated transmission tape and electrochemical decomposition mentioned above. Instead of punching Morse characters into the transmission tape, it was perforated with a series of small round holes that formed Roman letters. The vertical sections of these letters were originally five holes high. The transmitting device had five small wheels or rollers, instead of two, for making contacts through the perforations and generating short electric impulses that traveled over the lines. Initially, five lines were used to carry these impulses to the receiving device, where there were five iron pins pressing against the drum. Using these pins, the chemically treated tape was marked with dots that matched the received impulses, creating a clear record of the letters and words transmitted.
For purposes of economy in investment and maintenance, Edison devised subsequently a plan by which the number of conducting lines was reduced to two, instead of five. The verticals of the letters were perforated only four holes high, and the four rollers were arranged in pairs, one pair being slightly in advance of the other. There were, of course, only four pins at the receiving instrument. Two were of iron and two of tellurium, it being the gist of Edison's plan to effect the marking of the chemical paper by one metal with a positive current, and by the other metal with a negative current. In the following diagram, which shows the theory of this arrangement, it will be seen that both the transmitting rollers and the receiving pins are arranged in pairs, one pair in each case being slightly in advance of the other. Of these receiving pins, one pair—1 and 3—are of iron, and the other pair—2 and 4—of tellurium. Pins 1-2 and 3-4 are electrically connected together in other pairs, and then each of these pairs is connected with one of the main lines that run respectively to the middle of two groups of batteries at the transmitting end. The terminals of these groups of batteries are connected respectively to the four rollers which impinge upon the transmitting drum, the negatives being connected to 5 and 7, and the positives to 6 and 8, as denoted by the letters N and P. The transmitting and receiving drums are respectively connected to earth.
To save on investment and maintenance costs, Edison later developed a plan that cut the number of conducting lines down to two instead of five. The verticals of the letters had only four holes punctured, and the four rollers were set up in pairs, with one pair slightly ahead of the other. There were, of course, only four pins at the receiving instrument. Two were made of iron and two of tellurium. Edison's idea was to mark the chemical paper using one metal with a positive current and the other metal with a negative current. In the following diagram, which illustrates the concept of this arrangement, you can see that both the transmitting rollers and the receiving pins are set up in pairs, with one pair in each case being slightly ahead of the other. Of these receiving pins, one pair—1 and 3—are made of iron, and the other pair—2 and 4—are made of tellurium. Pins 1-2 and 3-4 are electrically connected together in other pairs, with each of these pairs linked to one of the main lines that run to the center of two battery groups at the transmitting end. The terminals of these battery groups are connected to the four rollers that press against the transmitting drum, with the negative connections going to 5 and 7, and the positive connections to 6 and 8, as marked by the letters N and P. The transmitting and receiving drums are grounded.
In operation the perforated tape is placed on the transmission drum, and the chemically prepared tape on the receiving drum. As the perforated tape passes over the transmission drum the advanced rollers 6 or 8 first close the circuit through the perforations, and a positive current passes from the batteries through the drum and down to the ground; thence through the earth at the receiving end up to the other drum and back to the batteries via the tellurium pins 2 or 4 and the line wire. With this positive current the tellurium pins make marks upon the paper tape, but the iron pins make no mark. In the merest fraction of a second, as the perforated paper continues to pass over the transmission drum, the rollers 5 or 7 close the circuit through other perforations and t e current passes in the opposite direction, over the line wire, through pins 1 or 3, and returns through the earth. In this case the iron pins mark the paper tape, but the tellurium pins make no mark. It will be obvious, therefore, that as the rollers are set so as to allow of currents of opposite polarity to be alternately and rapidly sent by means of the perforations, the marks upon the tape at the receiving station will occupy their proper relative positions, and the aggregate result will be letters corresponding to those perforated in the transmission tape.
In operation, the perforated tape is placed on the transmission drum, and the chemically treated tape is on the receiving drum. As the perforated tape moves over the transmission drum, the advanced rollers 6 or 8 first complete the circuit through the perforations, and a positive current flows from the batteries through the drum and down to the ground; then through the earth at the receiving end up to the other drum and back to the batteries via the tellurium pins 2 or 4 and the line wire. With this positive current, the tellurium pins create marks on the paper tape, while the iron pins leave no mark. In the tiniest fraction of a second, as the perforated paper continues to pass over the transmission drum, the rollers 5 or 7 close the circuit through other perforations, and the current flows in the opposite direction, over the line wire, through pins 1 or 3, and returns through the earth. In this case, the iron pins mark the paper tape, while the tellurium pins leave no mark. It is clear, then, that as the rollers are set to allow currents of opposite polarity to be rapidly sent alternately through the perforations, the marks on the tape at the receiving station will be in their correct relative positions, and the overall result will be letters that correspond to those perforated in the transmission tape.
Edison subsequently made still further improvements in this direction, by which he reduced the number of conducting wires to one, but the principles involved were analogous to the one just described.
Edison then made even more improvements in this area, which allowed him to reduce the number of conducting wires to one, but the underlying principles were similar to the ones just mentioned.
This Roman letter system was in use for several years on lines between New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, and was so efficient that a speed of three thousand words a minute was attained on the line between the two first-named cities.
This Roman letter system was used for several years on routes between New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, and it was so effective that a speed of three thousand words per minute was achieved on the line between the first two cities.
Inasmuch as there were several proposed systems of rapid automatic telegraphy in existence at the time Edison entered the field, but none of them in practical commercial use, it becomes a matter of interest to inquire wherein they were deficient, and what constituted the elements of Edison's success.
Since there were several proposed systems of quick automatic telegraphy at the time Edison got involved, but none were practically used commercially, it’s interesting to look at what they lacked and what made Edison's approach successful.
The chief difficulties in the transmission of Morse characters had been two in number, the most serious of which was that on the receiving tape the characters would be prolonged and run into one another, forming a draggled line and thus rendering the message unintelligible. This arose from the fact that, on account of the rapid succession of the electric impulses, there was not sufficient time between them for the electric action to cease entirely. Consequently the line could not clear itself, and became surcharged, as it were; the effect being an attenuated prolongation of each impulse as manifested in a weaker continuation of the mark on the tape, thus making the whole message indistinct. These secondary marks were called "tailings."
The main challenges in transmitting Morse characters were twofold, with the biggest issue being that the characters on the receiving tape would be stretched and blend together, creating a messy line and making the message unreadable. This happened because the rapid succession of electric signals didn't allow enough time for the electric action to fully stop between them. As a result, the line couldn’t clear itself and became overloaded; this caused each signal to be prolonged, showing up as a weaker continuation of the mark on the tape, which made the entire message unclear. These extra marks were referred to as "tailings."
For many years electricians had tried in vain to overcome this difficulty. Edison devoted a great deal of thought and energy to the question, in the course of which he experimented through one hundred and twenty consecutive nights, in the year 1873, on the line between New York and Washington. His solution of the problem was simple but effectual. It involved the principle of inductive compensation. In a shunt circuit with the receiving instrument he introduced electromagnets. The pulsations of current passed through the helices of these magnets, producing an augmented marking effect upon the receiving tape, but upon the breaking of the current, the magnet, in discharging itself of the induced magnetism, would set up momentarily a counter-current of opposite polarity. This neutralized the "tailing" effect by clearing the line between pulsations, thus allowing the telegraphic characters to be clearly and distinctly outlined upon the tape. Further elaboration of this method was made later by the addition of rheostats, condensers, and local opposition batteries on long lines.
For many years, electricians struggled to solve this problem. Edison dedicated a lot of time and energy to it, experimenting for one hundred and twenty straight nights in 1873 on the line between New York and Washington. His solution was straightforward yet effective. It used the principle of inductive compensation. In a shunt circuit with the receiving device, he added electromagnets. The current pulsed through the coils of these magnets, creating a stronger marking effect on the receiving tape. However, when the current stopped, the magnet, releasing its induced magnetism, would temporarily generate a counter-current of opposite polarity. This canceled out the "tailing" effect by clearing the line between pulses, allowing the telegraphic characters to be clearly and distinctly displayed on the tape. Later, this method was further refined with the addition of rheostats, capacitors, and local opposition batteries for long lines.
The other difficulty above referred to was one that had also occupied considerable thought and attention of many workers in the field, and related to the perforating of the dash in the transmission tape. It involved mechanical complications that seemed to be insurmountable, and up to the time Edison invented his perforating machine no really good method was available. He abandoned the attempt to cut dashes as such, in the paper tape, but instead punched three round holes so arranged as to form a triangle. A concrete example is presented in the illustration below, which shows a piece of tape with perforations representing the word "same."
The other challenge mentioned earlier was one that had also taken up a lot of thought and attention from many workers in the field, and it had to do with creating dashes in the transmission tape. It involved mechanical issues that seemed impossible to solve, and until Edison invented his perforating machine, there was no really effective method available. He gave up trying to cut dashes in the paper tape and instead punched three round holes arranged to form a triangle. A concrete example is shown in the illustration below, which displays a piece of tape with perforations representing the word "same."
The philosophy of this will be at once perceived when it is remembered that the two little wheels running upon the drum of the transmitting instrument were situated side by side, corresponding in distance to the two rows of holes. When a triangle of three holes, intended to form the dash, reached the wheels, one of them dropped into a lower hole. Before it could get out, the other wheel dropped into the hole at the apex of the triangle, thus continuing the connection, which was still further prolonged by the first wheel dropping into the third hole. Thus, an extended contact was made, which, by transmitting a long impulse, resulted in the marking of a dash upon the receiving tape.
The concept here becomes clear when we remember that the two small wheels on the transmitting device were positioned next to each other, matching the distance of the two rows of holes. When a triangle of three holes, meant to create a dash, reached the wheels, one wheel fell into a lower hole. Before it could move out, the other wheel dropped into the hole at the top of the triangle, maintaining the connection, and then the first wheel fell into the third hole. This created a continuous contact, and by sending a long signal, it resulted in a dash being marked on the receiving tape.
This method was in successful commercial use for some time in the early seventies, giving a speed of from three to four thousand words a minute over a single line, but later on was superseded by Edison's Roman letter system, above referred to.
This method was successfully used commercially for a while in the early seventies, achieving speeds of three to four thousand words per minute over a single line, but was later replaced by Edison's Roman letter system mentioned earlier.
The subject of automatic telegraphy received a vast amount of attention from inventors at the time it was in vogue. None was more earnest or indefatigable than Edison, who, during the progress of his investigations, took out thirty-eight patents on various inventions relating thereto, some of them covering chemical solutions for the receiving paper. This of itself was a subject of much importance and a vast amount of research and labor was expended upon it. In the laboratory note-books there are recorded thousands of experiments showing that Edison's investigations not only included an enormous number of chemical salts and compounds, but also an exhaustive variety of plants, flowers, roots, herbs, and barks.
The topic of automatic telegraphy attracted a lot of attention from inventors when it was popular. None were more dedicated or tireless than Edison, who, during his research, obtained thirty-eight patents for various related inventions, including some that covered chemical solutions for the receiving paper. This alone was a significant topic that involved a huge amount of research and effort. In the laboratory notebooks, there are thousands of experiments recorded that show Edison's research included a vast array of chemical salts and compounds, as well as an extensive variety of plants, flowers, roots, herbs, and barks.
It seems inexplicable at first view that a system of telegraphy sufficiently rapid and economical to be practically available for important business correspondence should have fallen into disuse. This, however, is made clear—so far as concerns Edison's invention at any rate—in Chapter VIII of the preceding narrative.
It seems puzzling at first glance that a telegraph system fast and affordable enough to be useful for significant business communication would become obsolete. However, this becomes clear—at least regarding Edison's invention—in Chapter VIII of the earlier narrative.
IV. WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY
ALTHOUGH Mr. Edison has taken no active part in the development of the more modern wireless telegraphy, and his name has not occurred in connection therewith, the underlying phenomena had been noted by him many years in advance of the art, as will presently be explained. The authors believe that this explanation will reveal a status of Edison in relation to the subject that has thus far been unknown to the public.
ALTHOUGH Mr. Edison has not played an active role in the development of modern wireless telegraphy, and his name hasn’t been mentioned in connection with it, he had observed the underlying phenomena many years before the technology advanced, as will be explained shortly. The authors believe that this explanation will show a side of Edison’s relationship to the subject that has so far been unknown to the public.
While the term "wireless telegraphy," as now applied to the modern method of electrical communication between distant points without intervening conductors, is self-explanatory, it was also applicable, strictly speaking, to the previous art of telegraphing to and from moving trains, and between points not greatly remote from each other, and not connected together with wires.
While the term "wireless telegraphy," as it's used today to describe the modern method of electrical communication over long distances without wires, is pretty straightforward, it also technically referred to the earlier practice of sending telegrams to and from moving trains and between locations that weren't far apart and weren't linked by wires.
The latter system (described in Chapter XXIII and in a succeeding article of this Appendix) was based upon the phenomena of electromagnetic or electrostatic induction between conductors separated by more or less space, whereby electric impulses of relatively low potential and low frequency set up in. one conductor were transmitted inductively across the air to another conductor, and there received through the medium of appropriate instruments connected therewith.
The latter system (described in Chapter XXIII and in a following article of this Appendix) was based on the phenomena of electromagnetic or electrostatic induction between conductors separated by varying distances. In this setup, electric impulses of relatively low voltage and low frequency generated in one conductor were transmitted inductively through the air to another conductor, where they were received using suitable instruments connected to it.
As distinguished from this system, however, modern wireless telegraphy—so called—has its basis in the utilization of electric or ether waves in free space, such waves being set up by electric oscillations, or surgings, of comparatively high potential and high frequency, produced by the operation of suitable electrical apparatus. Broadly speaking, these oscillations arise from disruptive discharges of an induction coil, or other form of oscillator, across an air-gap, and their character is controlled by the manipulation of a special type of circuit-breaking key, by means of which long and short discharges are produced. The electric or etheric waves thereby set up are detected and received by another special form of apparatus more or less distant, without any intervening wires or conductors.
However, unlike this system, modern wireless telegraphy—so called—relies on the use of electric or ether waves in open space. These waves are generated by high-potential, high-frequency electric oscillations created by the operation of specific electrical equipment. Generally, these oscillations come from disruptive discharges of an induction coil or another type of oscillator across an air gap, and their nature is controlled by a special circuit-breaking key, which produces both long and short discharges. The electric or etheric waves generated are detected and received by another specialized device from a distance, without any wires or conductors in between.
In November, 1875, Edison, while experimenting in his Newark laboratory, discovered a new manifestation of electricity through mysterious sparks which could be produced under conditions unknown up to that time. Recognizing at once the absolutely unique character of the phenomena, he continued his investigations enthusiastically over two mouths, finally arriving at a correct conclusion as to the oscillatory nature of the hitherto unknown manifestations. Strange to say, however, the true import and practical applicability of these phenomena did not occur to his mind. Indeed, it was not until more than TWELVE YEARS AFTERWARD, in 1887, upon the publication of the notable work of Prof. H. Hertz proving the existence of electric waves in free space, that Edison realized the fact that the fundamental principle of aerial telegraphy had been within his grasp in the winter of 1875; for although the work of Hertz was more profound and mathematical than that of Edison, the principle involved and the phenomena observed were practically identical—in fact, it may be remarked that some of the methods and experimental apparatus were quite similar, especially the "dark box" with micrometer adjustment, used by both in observing the spark. [25]
In November 1875, Edison, while experimenting in his Newark lab, discovered a new form of electricity through mysterious sparks that could be created under previously unknown conditions. Recognizing the truly unique nature of the phenomena, he enthusiastically continued his investigations for over two months, eventually arriving at a correct conclusion about the oscillatory nature of these unknown manifestations. Strangely, however, he didn’t grasp the true significance and practical use of these phenomena. In fact, it wasn't until more than twelve years later, in 1887, when Professor H. Hertz published his important work proving the existence of electric waves in free space, that Edison realized he had the fundamental principle of aerial telegraphy within his reach during the winter of 1875. Although Hertz’s work was more profound and mathematical than Edison’s, the principles involved and the observed phenomena were practically identical. In fact, it's worth noting that some of the methods and experimental setups were quite similar, especially the "dark box" with micrometer adjustment used by both to observe the spark. [25]
[Footnote 25: During the period in which Edison exhibited his lighting system at the Paris Exposition in 1881, his representative, Mr. Charles Batchelor, repeated Edison's remarkable experiments of the winter of 1875 for the benefit of a great number of European savants, using with other apparatus the original "dark box" with micrometer adjustment.]
[Footnote 25: When Edison showcased his lighting system at the Paris Exposition in 1881, his representative, Mr. Charles Batchelor, repeated Edison's impressive experiments from the winter of 1875 for the benefit of many European scholars, using the original "dark box" with micrometer adjustment along with other equipment.]
There is not the slightest intention on the part of the authors to detract in the least degree from the brilliant work of Hertz, but, on the contrary, to ascribe to him the honor that is his due in having given mathematical direction and certainty to so important a discovery. The adaptation of the principles thus elucidated and the subsequent development of the present wonderful art by Marconi, Branly, Lodge, Slaby, and others are now too well known to call for further remark at this place.
There is absolutely no intention on the part of the authors to take away from the outstanding work of Hertz. On the contrary, they aim to give him the credit he deserves for bringing mathematical clarity and certainty to such a significant discovery. The application of the principles he clarified and the further development of this amazing technology by Marconi, Branly, Lodge, Slaby, and others are so well known that there's no need to elaborate on them here.
Strange to say, that although Edison's early experiments in "etheric force" called forth extensive comment and discussion in the public prints of the period, they seemed to have been generally overlooked when the work of Hertz was published. At a meeting of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, held in London on May 16, 1889, at which there was a discussion on the celebrated paper of Prof. (Sir) Oliver Lodge on "Lightning Conductors," however; the chairman, Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), made the following remarks:
Strangely enough, even though Edison's early experiments with "etheric force" sparked a lot of discussion and commentary in the media at the time, they seemed to be largely ignored when Hertz's work was released. During a meeting of the Institution of Electrical Engineers in London on May 16, 1889, where they discussed the famous paper by Prof. (Sir) Oliver Lodge on "Lightning Conductors," the chairman, Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), made the following comments:
"We all know how Faraday made himself a cage six feet in diameter, hung it up in mid-air in the theatre of the Royal Institution, went into it, and, as he said, lived in it and made experiments. It was a cage with tin-foil hanging all round it; it was not a complete metallic enclosing shell. Faraday had a powerful machine working in the neighborhood, giving all varieties of gradual working-up and discharges by 'impulsive rush'; and whether it was a sudden discharge of ordinary insulated conductors, or of Leyden jars in the neighborhood outside the cage, or electrification and discharge of the cage itself, he saw no effects on his most delicate gold-leaf electroscopes in the interior. His attention was not directed to look for Hertz sparks, or probably he might have found them in the interior. Edison seems to have noticed something of the kind in what he called the etheric force. His name 'etheric' may, thirteen years ago, have seemed to many people absurd. But now we are all beginning to call these inductive phenomena 'etheric.'"
"We all know how Faraday made himself a six-foot-diameter cage, hung it up in the air in the theater of the Royal Institution, went inside, and, as he said, lived in it and conducted experiments. It was a cage with tin foil hanging all around it; it wasn't a completely metallic enclosure. Faraday had a powerful machine operating nearby, creating all kinds of gradual build-up and discharges through 'impulsive rush'; and whether it was a sudden discharge from ordinary insulated conductors, Leyden jars outside the cage, or the electrification and discharge of the cage itself, he observed no effects on his most sensitive gold-leaf electroscopes inside. He wasn't focused on looking for Hertz sparks, or else he might have found them inside. Edison seems to have noticed something similar in what he called the etheric force. His term 'etheric' may have seemed absurd to many people thirteen years ago. But now, we’re all starting to refer to these inductive phenomena as 'etheric.'"
With these preliminary observations, let us now glance briefly at Edison's laboratory experiments, of which mention has been made.
With these initial observations, let's now take a quick look at Edison's lab experiments, which have been referenced.
Oh the first manifestation of the unusual phenomena in November, 1875, Edison's keenness of perception led him at once to believe that he had discovered a new force. Indeed, the earliest entry of this discovery in the laboratory note-book bore that caption. After a few days of further experiment and observation, however, he changed it to "Etheric Force," and the further records thereof (all in Mr. Batchelor's handwriting) were under that heading.
Oh, the first appearance of the unusual phenomenon in November 1875, Edison's sharp perception immediately made him think he had found a new force. In fact, the initial entry of this discovery in the lab notebook had that title. However, after a few more days of experiments and observations, he changed it to "Etheric Force," and all subsequent records (written by Mr. Batchelor) were under that heading.
The publication of Edison's discovery created considerable attention at the time, calling forth a storm of general ridicule and incredulity. But a few scientific men of the period, whose experimental methods were careful and exact, corroborated his deductions after obtaining similar phenomena by repeating his experiments with intelligent precision. Among these was the late Dr. George M. Beard, a noted physicist, who entered enthusiastically into the investigation, and, in addition to a great deal of independent experiment, spent much time with Edison at his laboratory. Doctor Beard wrote a treatise of some length on the subject, in which he concurred with Edison's deduction that the phenomena were the manifestation of oscillations, or rapidly reversing waves of electricity, which did not respond to the usual tests. Edison had observed the tendency of this force to diffuse itself in various directions through the air and through matter, hence the name "Etheric" that he had provisionally applied to it.
The release of Edison's discovery attracted a lot of attention at the time, sparking widespread ridicule and disbelief. However, a few scientists of that era, known for their careful and precise experimental methods, confirmed his findings after reproducing similar phenomena by diligently repeating his experiments. Among them was the late Dr. George M. Beard, a well-known physicist, who eagerly engaged in the research and spent significant time with Edison in his lab. Dr. Beard wrote a fairly lengthy treatise on the topic, agreeing with Edison's conclusion that the phenomena were manifestations of oscillations, or rapidly reversing waves of electricity, which did not respond to standard tests. Edison had noticed that this force tended to spread out in different directions through the air and through materials, hence the name "Etheric" that he had temporarily assigned to it.
Edison's laboratory notes on this striking investigation are fascinating and voluminous, but cannot be reproduced in full for lack of space. In view of the later practical application of the principles involved, however, the reader will probably be interested in perusing a few extracts therefrom as illustrated by facsimiles of the original sketches from the laboratory note-book.
Edison's lab notes on this remarkable investigation are interesting and extensive, but we can't include them all here due to space limitations. However, considering the later real-world application of the principles involved, the reader will likely find it worthwhile to look at a few excerpts, along with copies of the original sketches from the lab notebook.
As the full significance of the experiments shown by these extracts may not be apparent to a lay reader, it may be stated by way of premise that, ordinarily, a current only follows a closed circuit. An electric bell or electric light is a familiar instance of this rule. There is in each case an open (wire) circuit which is closed by pressing the button or turning the switch, thus making a complete and uninterrupted path in which the current may travel and do its work. Until the time of Edison's investigations of 1875, now under consideration, electricity had never been known to manifest itself except through a closed circuit. But, as the reader will see from the following excerpts, Edison discovered a hitherto unknown phenomenon—namely, that under certain conditions the rule would be reversed and electricity would pass through space and through matter entirely unconnected with its point of origin. In other words, he had found the forerunner of wireless telegraphy. Had he then realized the full import of his discovery, all he needed was to increase the strength of the waves and to provide a very sensitive detector, like the coherer, in order to have anticipated the principal developments that came many years afterward. With these explanatory observations, we will now turn to the excerpts referred to, which are as follows:
Since the full significance of the experiments detailed in these excerpts might not be clear to a general reader, it's worth noting that a current usually flows only through a closed circuit. An electric bell or light is a well-known example of this principle. In each case, there is an open (wire) circuit that is closed when you press the button or flip the switch, creating a complete and uninterrupted pathway for the current to flow and perform its function. Until Edison's investigations in 1875, which we are considering now, electricity had only been known to operate through a closed circuit. However, as you will see in the following excerpts, Edison discovered a previously unknown phenomenon—specifically, that under certain conditions, this rule could be reversed, and electricity could travel through space and through materials that were completely disconnected from its source. In other words, he found the precursor to wireless telegraphy. If he had fully understood the implications of his discovery, all he would have needed to do was amplify the strength of the waves and use a very sensitive detector, like the coherer, to foresee the main advancements that would emerge many years later. With these clarifications, let's now look at the excerpts mentioned, which are as follows:
"November 22, 1875. New Force.—In experimenting with a vibrator magnet consisting of a bar of Stubb's steel fastened at one end and made to vibrate by means of a magnet, we noticed a spark coming from the cores of the magnet. This we have noticed often in relays, in stock-printers, when there were a little iron filings between the armature and core, and more often in our new electric pen, and we have always come to the conclusion that it was caused by strong induction. But when we noticed it on this vibrator it seemed so strong that it struck us forcibly there might be something more than induction. We now found that if we touched any metallic part of the vibrator or magnet we got the spark. The larger the body of iron touched to the vibrator the larger the spark. We now connected a wire to X, the end of the vibrating rod, and we found we could get a spark from it by touching a piece of iron to it, and one of the most curious phenomena is that if you turn the wire around on itself and let the point of the wire touch any other portion of itself you get a spark. By connecting X to the gas-pipe we drew sparks from the gas-pipes in any part of the room by drawing an iron wire over the brass jet of the cock. This is simply wonderful, and a good proof that the cause of the spark is a TRUE UNKNOWN FORCE."
"November 22, 1875. New Force.—While experimenting with a vibrating magnet made from a bar of Stubb's steel attached at one end and set into motion using a magnet, we noticed a spark coming from the cores of the magnet. We've seen this happen frequently in relays and stock printers, particularly when some iron filings were between the armature and core, and even more often in our new electric pen. We always concluded that it was due to strong induction. However, when we observed it with this vibrator, the spark seemed so strong that it led us to think there might be more going on than just induction. We discovered that if we touched any metal part of the vibrator or magnet, we experienced the spark. The larger the piece of iron we touched to the vibrator, the bigger the spark became. We then connected a wire to X, the end of the vibrating rod, and found we could generate a spark by touching a piece of iron to it. One of the most interesting phenomena was that if you twisted the wire around itself and let the tip touch any other part of itself, a spark would appear. By connecting X to the gas pipe, we were able to draw sparks from any part of the room by brushing an iron wire over the brass jet of the faucet. This is simply amazing and provides strong evidence that the spark is caused by a TRUE UNKNOWN FORCE."
"November 23, 1815. New Force.—The following very curious result was obtained with it. The vibrator shown in Fig. 1 and battery were placed on insulated stands; and a wire connected to X (tried both copper and iron) carried over to the stove about twenty feet distant. When the end of the wire was rubbed on the stove it gave out splendid sparks. When permanently connected to the stove, sparks could be drawn from the stove by a piece of wire held in the hand. The point X of vibrator was now connected to the gas-pipe and still the sparks could be drawn from the stove."
"November 23, 1815. New Force.—The following very interesting result was obtained with it. The vibrator shown in Fig. 1 and the battery were placed on insulated stands; a wire connected to X (both copper and iron were tried) ran over to the stove about twenty feet away. When the end of the wire was rubbed on the stove, it produced impressive sparks. When it was permanently connected to the stove, sparks could be drawn from the stove using a piece of wire held in hand. The point X of the vibrator was then connected to the gas pipe, and still, sparks could be drawn from the stove."
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
"Put a coil of wire over the end of rod X and passed the ends of spool through galvanometer without affecting it in any way. Tried a 6-ohm spool add a 200-ohm. We now tried all the metals, touching each one in turn to the point X." [Here follows a list of metals and the character of spark obtained with each.]
"Place a coil of wire over the end of rod X and run the ends of the spool through the galvanometer without changing anything. We used a 6-ohm spool and added a 200-ohm one. Next, we tested all the metals, touching each one to point X in turn." [Here follows a list of metals and the type of spark obtained with each.]
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
"By increasing the battery from eight to twelve cells we get a spark when the vibrating magnet is shunted with 3 ohms. Cannot taste the least shock at B, yet between carbon points the spark is very vivid. As will be seen, X has no connection with anything. With a glass rod four feet long, well rubbed with a piece of silk over a hot stove, with a piece of battery carbon secured to one end, we received vivid sparks into the carbon when the other end was held in the hand with the handkerchief, yet the galvanometer, chemical paper, the sense of shock in the tongue, and a gold-leaf electroscope which would diverge at two feet from a half-inch spark plate-glass machine were not affected in the least by it.
By increasing the battery from eight to twelve cells, we get a spark when the vibrating magnet is connected with 3 ohms. There’s no detectable shock at B, but there’s a very bright spark between the carbon points. As you’ll see, X isn’t connected to anything. Using a four-foot glass rod, well-rubbed with a silk cloth over a hot stove, and attaching a piece of battery carbon to one end, we observed bright sparks in the carbon when we held the other end with our hand wrapped in a handkerchief. However, the galvanometer, chemical paper, the sensation of shock on the tongue, and a gold-leaf electroscope — which would diverge two feet away from a half-inch spark plate glass machine — showed no response at all.
"A piece of coal held to the wire showed faint sparks.
"A piece of coal pressed against the wire produced faint sparks."
"We had a box made thus: whereby two points could be brought together within a dark box provided with an eyepiece. The points were iron, and we found the sparks were very irregular. After testing some time two lead-pencils found more regular and very much more vivid. We then substituted the graphite points instead of iron." [26]
"We had a box made like this: where two points could be brought together inside a dark box with an eyepiece. The points were made of iron, and we noticed that the sparks were very inconsistent. After some time testing, two lead pencils produced more consistent and much brighter sparks. We then replaced the iron points with graphite." [26]
[Footnote 26: The dark box had micrometer screws for delicate adjustment of the carbon points, and was thereafter largely used in this series of investigations for better study of the spark. When Mr. Edison's experiments were repeated by Mr. Batchelor, who represented him at the Paris Exposition of 1881, the dark box was employed for a similar purpose.]
[Footnote 26: The dark box had micrometer screws for precise adjustments of the carbon points, and was mainly used in this series of investigations to better study the spark. When Mr. Edison's experiments were repeated by Mr. Batchelor, who represented him at the Paris Exposition of 1881, the dark box was used for the same purpose.]
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
After recording a considerable number of other experiments, the laboratory notes go on to state:
After noting a significant number of other experiments, the lab notes continue:
"November 30, 1875. Etheric Force.—We found the addition of battery to the Stubb's wire vibrator greatly increased the volume of spark. Several persons could obtain sparks from the gas-pipes at once, each spark being equal in volume and brilliancy to the spark drawn by a single person.... Edison now grasped the (gas) pipe, and with the other hand holding a piece of metal, he touched several other metallic substances, obtained sparks, showing that the force passed through his body."
"November 30, 1875. Etheric Force.—We discovered that adding a battery to Stubb's wire vibrator significantly boosted the spark's volume. Multiple people were able to get sparks from the gas pipes simultaneously, with each spark being just as powerful and bright as the one produced by a single person.... Edison then grabbed the gas pipe and, with his other hand holding a piece of metal, touched various other metallic objects and got sparks, demonstrating that the force flowed through his body."
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
"December 3, 1875. Etheric Force.—Charley Edison hung to the gas-pipe with feet above the floor, and with a knife got a spark from the pipe he was hanging on. We now took the wire from the vibrator in one hand and stood on a block of paraffin eighteen inches square and six inches thick; holding a knife in the other hand, we drew sparks from the stove-pipe. We now tried the crucial test of passing the etheric current through the sciatic nerve of a frog just killed. Previous to trying, we tested its sensibility by the current from a single Bunsen cell. We put in resistance up to 500,000 ohms, and the twitching was still perceptible. We tried the induced current from our induction coil having one cell on primary,, the spark jumping about one-fiftieth of an inch, the terminal of the secondary connected to the frog and it straightened out with violence. We arranged frog's legs to pass etheric force through. We placed legs on an inverted beaker, and held the two ends of the wires on glass rods eight inches long. On connecting one to the sciatic nerve and the other to the fleshy part of the leg no movement could be discerned, although brilliant sparks could be obtained on the graphite points when the frog was in circuit. Doctor Beard was present when this was tried."
"December 3, 1875. Etheric Force.—Charley Edison hung from the gas pipe with his feet off the floor and used a knife to create a spark from the pipe he was hanging onto. We then took the wire from the vibrator in one hand and stood on a block of paraffin that was eighteen inches square and six inches thick; with a knife in the other hand, we drew sparks from the stove pipe. We proceeded to perform the crucial test of passing the etheric current through the sciatic nerve of a freshly killed frog. Before trying this, we tested its sensitivity using a current from a single Bunsen cell. We added resistance up to 500,000 ohms, and the twitching remained noticeable. We experimented with the induced current from our induction coil, using one cell on the primary, with the spark jumping about one-fiftieth of an inch. The terminal of the secondary was connected to the frog, causing it to straighten out violently. We set up the frog's legs to pass etheric force through them. We placed the legs on an inverted beaker and held the ends of the wires on eight-inch glass rods. When connecting one wire to the sciatic nerve and the other to the fleshy part of the leg, no movement was observed, even though bright sparks could be produced at the graphite points when the frog was in the circuit. Doctor Beard was present during this experiment."
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
"December 5, 1875. Etheric Force.—Three persons grasping hands and standing upon blocks of paraffin twelve inches square and six thick drew sparks from the adjoining stove when another person touched the sounder with any piece of metal.... A galvanoscopic frog giving contractions with one cell through two water rheostats was then placed in circuit. When the wires from the vibrator and the gas-pipe were connected, slight contractions were noted, sometimes very plain and marked, showing the apparent presence of electricity, which from the high insulation seemed improbable. Doctor Beard, who was present, inferred from the way the leg contracted that it moved on both opening and closing the circuit. To test this we disconnected the wire between the frog and battery, and placed, instead of a vibrating sounder, a simple Morse key and a sounder taking the 'etheric' from armature. The spark was now tested in dark box and found to be very strong. It was then connected to the nerves of the frog, BUT NO MOVEMENT OF ANY KIND COULD BE DETECTED UPON WORKING THE KEY, although the brilliancy and power of the spark were undiminished. The thought then occurred to Edison that the movement of the frog was due to mechanical vibrations from the vibrator (which gives probably two hundred and fifty vibrations per second), passing through the wires and irritating the sensitive nerves of the frog. Upon disconnecting the battery wires and holding a tuning-fork giving three hundred and twenty-six vibrations per second to the base of the sounder, the vibrations over the wire made the frog contract nearly every time.... The contraction of the frog's legs may with considerable safety be said to be caused by these mechanical vibrations being transmitted through the conducting wires."
"December 5, 1875. Etheric Force.—Three people holding hands and standing on blocks of paraffin that were twelve inches square and six inches thick generated sparks from the nearby stove when another person touched the sounder with a piece of metal. A galvanoscopic frog, which showed contractions using one battery cell and two water rheostats, was then connected to the circuit. When the wires from the vibrator and the gas pipe were linked, slight contractions were observed—sometimes very clear and noticeable—indicating the presence of electricity, which seemed unlikely given the high level of insulation. Doctor Beard, who was present, concluded from the way the frog's leg contracted that it reacted upon both opening and closing the circuit. To verify this, we disconnected the wire between the frog and the battery and replaced the vibrating sounder with a simple Morse key and a sounder relying on the 'etheric' from the armature. We tested the spark in a dark box and found it to be very strong. It was then connected to the frog's nerves, BUT NO MOVEMENT OF ANY KIND COULD BE DETECTED WHEN OPERATING THE KEY, even though the brightness and power of the spark were unchanged. Edison then speculated that the frog's movement was caused by mechanical vibrations from the vibrator (which likely produced about two hundred and fifty vibrations per second) traveling through the wires and irritating the frog's sensitive nerves. After disconnecting the battery wires and holding a tuning fork vibrating at three hundred and twenty-six vibrations per second against the base of the sounder, the vibrations along the wire made the frog contract nearly every time. The contraction of the frog's legs can therefore reasonably be attributed to these mechanical vibrations being transmitted through the conductive wires."
Edison thought that the longitudinal vibrations caused by the sounder produced a more marked effect, and proceeded to try out his theory. The very next entry in the laboratory note-book bears the same date as the above (December 5, 1875), and is entitled "Longitudinal Vibrations," and reads as follows:
Edison believed that the longitudinal vibrations created by the sounder had a stronger effect, so he set out to test his theory. The very next entry in the lab notebook has the same date as the previous one (December 5, 1875) and is titled "Longitudinal Vibrations," which reads as follows:
"We took a long iron wire one-sixteenth of an inch in diameter and rubbed it lengthways with a piece of leather with resin on for about three feet, backward and forward. About ten feet away we applied the wire to the back of the neck and it gives a horrible sensation, showing the vibrations conducted through the wire."
"We took a long iron wire that's one-sixteenth of an inch wide and rubbed it up and down with a piece of leather coated with resin for about three feet. About ten feet away, we placed the wire against the back of the neck, and it created a terrible sensation, demonstrating the vibrations carried through the wire."
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
The following experiment illustrates notably the movement of the electric waves through free space:
The following experiment clearly demonstrates the movement of electric waves through free space:
"December 26, 1875. Etheric Force.—An experiment tried to-night gives a curious result. A is a vibrator, B, C, D, E are sheets of tin-foil hung on insulating stands. The sheets are about twelve by eight inches. B and C are twenty-six inches apart, C and D forty-eight inches and D and E twenty-six inches. B is connected to the vibrator and E to point in dark box, the other point to ground. We received sparks at intervals, although insulated by such space."
"December 26, 1875. Etheric Force.—An experiment conducted tonight yielded an interesting result. A is a vibrator, while B, C, D, and E are sheets of tin foil mounted on insulating stands. The sheets measure about twelve by eight inches. B and C are twenty-six inches apart, C and D are forty-eight inches apart, and D and E are twenty-six inches apart. B is connected to the vibrator, and E is linked to a point in a dark box, with the other point grounded. We observed sparks at intervals, despite being insulated by such distances."
With the above our extracts must close, although we have given but a few of the interesting experiments tried at the time. It will be noticed, however, that these records show much progression in a little over a month. Just after the item last above extracted, the Edison shop became greatly rushed on telegraphic inventions, and not many months afterward came the removal to Menlo Park; hence the etheric-force investigations were side-tracked for other matters deemed to be more important at that time.
With that, our excerpts must come to an end, even though we've only shared a few of the fascinating experiments conducted back then. It's clear that these records show significant progress in just over a month. Shortly after the last item we shared, the Edison shop became extremely busy with telegraphic inventions, and not long after that, they moved to Menlo Park. As a result, the investigations into etheric force were put on hold for other issues that were considered more important at that time.
Doctor Beard in his previously mentioned treatise refers, on page 27, to the views of others who have repeated Edison's experiments and observed the phenomena, and in a foot-note says:
Doctor Beard in his earlier mentioned paper refers, on page 27, to the views of others who have repeated Edison's experiments and observed the phenomena, and in a footnote says:
"Professor Houston, of Philadelphia, among others, has repeated some of these physical experiments, has adopted in full and after but a partial study of the subject, the hypothesis of rapidly reversed electricity as suggested in my letter to the Tribune of December 8th, and further claims priority of discovery, because he observed the spark of this when experimenting with a Ruhmkorff coil four years ago. To this claim, if it be seriously entertained, the obvious reply is that thousands of persons, probably, had seen this spark before it was DISCOVERED by Mr. Edison; it had been seen by Professor Nipher, who supposed, and still supposes, it is the spark of the extra current; it has been seen by my friend, Prof. J. E. Smith, who assumed, as he tells me, without examination, that it was inductive electricity breaking through bad insulation; it had been seen, as has been stated, by Mr. Edison many times before he thought it worthy of study, it was undoubtedly seen by Professor Houston, who, like so many others, failed to even suspect its meaning and thus missed an important discovery. The honor of a scientific discovery belongs, not to him who first sees a thing, but to him who first sees it with expert eyes; not to him even who drops an original suggestion, but to him who first makes, that suggestion fruitful of results. If to see with the eyes a phenomenon is to discover the law of which that phenomenon is a part, then every schoolboy who, before the time of Newton, ever saw an apple fall, was a discoverer of the law of gravitation...."
"Professor Houston from Philadelphia, along with others, has repeated some of these physical experiments and has fully adopted the hypothesis of rapidly reversed electricity that I suggested in my letter to the Tribune on December 8th, after only a partial study of the topic. He also claims priority for this discovery because he observed the spark while experimenting with a Ruhmkorff coil four years ago. In response to this claim, if it’s taken seriously, it’s important to note that probably thousands of people had seen this spark before Mr. Edison actually DISCOVERED it; it had been observed by Professor Nipher, who believed, and still believes, it is the spark of the extra current. My friend, Prof. J. E. Smith, saw it as well and assumed, as he tells me, without any examination, that it was inductive electricity breaking through faulty insulation. Mr. Edison saw it many times before he thought it deserved serious study, and undoubtedly Professor Houston also saw it but failed, like many others, to grasp its significance and thus missed an important discovery. The credit for a scientific discovery belongs not to the person who first notices something, but to the one who first understands it expertly; not even to the one who offers an original idea, but to the one who first makes that idea yield results. If simply observing a phenomenon is equivalent to discovering the law it embodies, then every schoolboy who saw an apple fall before Newton was a discoverer of the law of gravitation...."
Edison took out only one patent on long-distance telegraphy without wires. While the principle involved therein (induction) was not precisely analogous to the above, or to the present system of wireless telegraphy, it was a step forward in the progress of the art. The application was filed May 23, 1885, at the time he was working on induction telegraphy (two years before the publication of the work of Hertz), but the patent (No. 465,971) was not issued until December 29, 1891. In 1903 it was purchased from him by the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company. Edison has always had a great admiration for Marconi and his work, and a warm friendship exists between the two men. During the formative period of the Marconi Company attempts were made to influence Edison to sell this patent to an opposing concern, but his regard for Marconi and belief in the fundamental nature of his work were so strong that he refused flatly, because in the hands of an enemy the patent might be used inimically to Marconi's interests.
Edison took out just one patent for long-distance wireless telegraphy. While the principle involved (induction) wasn’t exactly the same as the current wireless telegraphy system, it was still a step forward in the development of the technology. He filed the application on May 23, 1885, while he was working on induction telegraphy (two years before Hertz published his work), but the patent (No. 465,971) wasn’t issued until December 29, 1891. In 1903, the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company bought it from him. Edison has always admired Marconi and his work, and they share a close friendship. During the early days of the Marconi Company, there were attempts to persuade Edison to sell this patent to a rival company, but his respect for Marconi and belief in the importance of his work were so strong that he flatly refused, knowing that in the hands of an enemy, the patent could be used against Marconi's interests.
Edison's ideas, as expressed in the specifications of this patent, show very clearly the close analogy of his system to that now in vogue. As they were filed in the Patent Office several years before the possibility of wireless telegraphy was suspected, it will undoubtedly be of interest to give the following extract therefrom:
Edison's ideas, as described in the specifications of this patent, clearly show how similar his system is to the one currently in use. Since these were submitted to the Patent Office several years before anyone even thought wireless telegraphy was possible, it will definitely be interesting to include the following excerpt:
"I have discovered that if sufficient elevation be obtained to overcome the curvature of the earth's surface and to reduce to the minimum the earth's absorption, electric telegraphing or signalling between distant points can be carried on by induction without the use of wires connecting such distant points. This discovery is especially applicable to telegraphing across bodies of water, thus avoiding the use of submarine cables, or for communicating between vessels at sea, or between vessels at sea and points on land, but it is also applicable to electric communication between distant points on land, it being necessary, however, on land (with the exception of communication over open prairie) to increase the elevation in order to reduce to the minimum the induction-absorbing effect of houses, trees, and elevations in the land itself. At sea from an elevation of one hundred feet I can communicate electrically a great distance, and since this elevation or one sufficiently high can be had by utilizing the masts of ships, signals can be sent and received between ships separated a considerable distance, and by repeating the signals from ship to ship communication can be established between points at any distance apart or across the largest seas and even oceans. The collision of ships in fogs can be prevented by this character of signalling, by the use of which, also, the safety of a ship in approaching a dangerous coast in foggy weather can be assured. In communicating between points on land, poles of great height can be used, or captive balloons. At these elevated points, whether upon the masts of ships, upon poles or balloons, condensing surfaces of metal or other conductor of electricity are located. Each condensing surface is connected with earth by an electrical conducting wire. On land this earth connection would be one of usual character in telegraphy. At sea the wire would run to one or more metal plates on the bottom of the vessel, where the earth connection would be made with the water. The high-resistance secondary circuit of an induction coil is located in circuit between the condensing surface and the ground. The primary circuit of the induction coil includes a battery and a device for transmitting signals, which may be a revolving circuit-breaker operated continually by a motor of any suitable kind, either electrical or mechanical, and a key normally short-circuiting the circuit-breaker or secondary coil. For receiving signals I locate in said circuit between the condensing surface and the ground a diaphragm sounder, which is preferably one of my electromotograph telephone receivers. The key normally short-circuiting the revolving circuit-breaker, no impulses are produced in the induction coil until the key is depressed, when a large number of impulses are produced in the primary, and by means of the secondary corresponding impulses or variations in tension are produced at the elevated condensing surface, producing thereat electrostatic impulses. These electrostatic impulses are transmitted inductively to the elevated condensing surface at the distant point, and are made audible by the electromotograph connected in the ground circuit with such distant condensing surface."
"I've found that if you can get high enough to counteract the curvature of the Earth's surface and minimize its absorption, you can send electric telegraphs or signals between far-off places through induction without needing wires to connect them. This discovery is particularly useful for telegraphing across bodies of water, avoiding the need for undersea cables, or for communicating between ships at sea, or between ships and land; however, it can also be used for electric communication between distant points on land. On land, except in open areas, you need to gain more elevation to reduce the induction-absorbing effects of buildings, trees, and the terrain itself. At sea, from a height of one hundred feet, I can communicate over long distances, and since you can achieve this height using the masts of ships, signals can be sent and received between ships that are far apart. By relaying the signals from ship to ship, communication can be established between any two points, even across the largest seas and oceans. This type of signaling can prevent ship collisions in fog and ensure a ship's safety when approaching dangerous coasts in foggy weather. For land communication, tall poles or balloons can be used. At these high points, whether they are on ship masts, poles, or balloons, there are condensing surfaces made of metal or other electrical conductors. Each condensing surface connects to the ground with an electrical conducting wire. On land, this ground connection would be the standard type used in telegraphy. At sea, the wire would lead to one or more metal plates on the bottom of the ship, where the connection to the water is made. The high-resistance secondary circuit of an induction coil is connected between the condensing surface and the ground. The primary circuit of the induction coil includes a battery and a device to transmit signals, which could be a revolving circuit-breaker continually operated by a suitable motor, either electrical or mechanical, along with a key that usually short-circuits the circuit-breaker or secondary coil. For receiving signals, I have a diaphragm sounder in that circuit between the condensing surface and the ground, which is preferably one of my electromotograph telephone receivers. Since the key usually short-circuits the revolving circuit-breaker, no impulses are generated in the induction coil until the key is pressed, at which point a large number of impulses are created in the primary circuit. This generates corresponding impulses or tension variations at the elevated condensing surface, producing electrostatic impulses. These electrostatic impulses are inductively transmitted to the elevated condensing surface at the remote location and are made audible by the electromotograph connected to the ground circuit with that distant condensing surface."
The accompanying illustrations are reduced facsimiles of the drawings attached to the above patent, No. 465,971.
The illustrations included are scaled-down copies of the drawings connected to the above patent, No. 465,971.
V. THE ELECTROMOTOGRAPH
IN solving a problem that at the time was thought to be insurmountable, and in the adaptability of its principles to the successful overcoming of apparently insuperable difficulties subsequently arising in other lines of work, this invention is one of the most remarkable of the many that Edison has made in his long career as an inventor.
In addressing a challenge that was believed to be impossible to overcome, and in how its principles can be applied to successfully tackle seemingly unbeatable obstacles in other fields of work, this invention stands out as one of the most impressive among the many that Edison has created throughout his lengthy career as an inventor.
The object primarily sought to be accomplished was the repeating of telegraphic signals from a distance without the aid of a galvanometer or an electromagnetic relay, to overcome the claims of the Page patent referred to in the preceding narrative. This object was achieved in the device described in Edison's basic patent No. 158,787, issued January 19, 1875, by the substitution of friction and anti-friction for the presence and absence of magnetism in a regulation relay.
The main goal was to repeat telegraphic signals from a distance without using a galvanometer or an electromagnetic relay, in order to address the issues raised by the Page patent mentioned earlier. This goal was accomplished in the device outlined in Edison’s basic patent No. 158,787, issued on January 19, 1875, by replacing magnetism with friction and anti-friction in a regulating relay.
It may be observed, parenthetically, for the benefit of the lay reader, that in telegraphy the device known as the relay is a receiving instrument containing an electromagnet adapted to respond to the weak line-current. Its armature moves in accordance with electrical impulses, or signals, transmitted from a distance, and, in so responding, operates mechanically to alternately close and open a separate local circuit in which there is a sounder and a powerful battery. When used for true relaying purposes the signals received from a distance are in turn repeated over the next section of the line, the powerful local battery furnishing current for this purpose. As this causes a loud repetition of the original signals, it will be seen that relaying is an economic method of extending a telegraph circuit beyond the natural limits of its battery power.
It can be noted, for the sake of the general reader, that in telegraphy, the device called a relay is a receiving instrument that includes an electromagnet designed to respond to the weak line current. Its armature moves in response to electrical impulses, or signals, sent from a distance, and in doing so, mechanically operates to alternately close and open a separate local circuit that contains a sounder and a strong battery. When used for proper relaying purposes, the signals received from afar are then repeated over the next section of the line, with the strong local battery providing the current for this function. Since this leads to a loud repetition of the original signals, it’s clear that relaying is an efficient way to extend a telegraph circuit beyond the natural limits of its battery power.
At the time of Edison's invention, as related in Chapter IX of the preceding narrative, there existed no other known method than the one just described for the repetition of transmitted signals, thus limiting the application of telegraphy to the pleasure of those who might own any patent controlling the relay, except on simple circuits where a single battery was sufficient. Edison's previous discovery of differential friction of surfaces through electrochemical decomposition was now adapted by him to produce motion at the end of a circuit without the intervention of an electromagnet. In other words, he invented a telegraph instrument having a vibrator controlled by electrochemical decomposition, to take the place of a vibrating armature operated by an electromagnet, and thus opened an entirely new and unsuspected avenue in the art.
At the time of Edison's invention, as discussed in Chapter IX of the previous narrative, there was no other known method for repeating transmitted signals except for the one just described, which limited the use of telegraphy to the advantage of those who owned any patents controlling the relay, other than in simple circuits where a single battery sufficed. Edison's earlier discovery of differential friction between surfaces through electrochemical decomposition was now adapted by him to create motion at the end of a circuit without needing an electromagnet. In other words, he invented a telegraph instrument with a vibrator controlled by electrochemical decomposition, replacing a vibrating armature operated by an electromagnet, and this opened up a completely new and unexpected path in the field.
Edison's electromotograph comprised an ingeniously arranged apparatus in which two surfaces, normally in contact with each other, were caused to alternately adhere by friction or slip by reason of electrochemical decomposition. One of these surfaces consisted of a small drum or cylinder of chalk, which was kept in a moistened condition with a suitable chemical solution, and adapted to revolve continuously by clockwork. The other surface consisted of a small pad which rested with frictional pressure on the periphery of the drum. This pad was carried on the end of a vibrating arm whose lateral movement was limited between two adjustable points. Normally, the frictional pressure between the drum and pad would carry the latter with the former as it revolved, but if the friction were removed a spring on the end of the vibrator arm would draw it back to its starting-place.
Edison's electromotograph featured a cleverly designed device where two surfaces, usually in contact, would alternately stick together due to friction or slide apart because of electrochemical decomposition. One of these surfaces was a small drum or cylinder made of chalk, kept moist with a special chemical solution, and set to rotate continuously by clockwork. The other surface was a small pad that pressed against the edge of the drum with friction. This pad was attached to the end of a vibrating arm, which could move side to side within two adjustable limits. Typically, the friction between the drum and pad would make the pad move along with the drum as it turned, but if the friction was removed, a spring at the end of the vibrating arm would pull it back to its starting position.
In practice, the chalk drum was electrically connected with one pole of an incoming telegraph circuit, and the vibrating arm and pad with the other pole. When the drum rotated, the friction of the pad carried the vibrating arm forward, but an electrical impulse coming over the line would decompose the chemical solution with which the drum was moistened, causing an effect similar to lubrication, and thus allowing the pad to slip backward freely in response to the pull of its retractile spring. The frictional movements of the pad with the drum were comparatively long or short, and corresponded with the length of the impulses sent in over the line. Thus, the transmission of Morse dots and dashes by the distant operator resulted in movements of corresponding length by the frictional pad and vibrating arm.
In practice, the chalk drum was electrically connected to one side of an incoming telegraph circuit, and the vibrating arm and pad were connected to the other side. When the drum turned, the friction from the pad pushed the vibrating arm forward, but an electrical impulse from the line would break down the chemical solution that moistened the drum, creating an effect similar to lubrication, allowing the pad to slide backward easily in response to the pull of its retractable spring. The friction movements of the pad with the drum were relatively long or short, depending on the length of the impulses sent over the line. As a result, the transmission of Morse dots and dashes by the distant operator caused corresponding movements of length by the friction pad and vibrating arm.
This brings us to the gist of the ingenious way in which Edison substituted the action of electrochemical decomposition for that of the electromagnet to operate a relay. The actual relaying was accomplished through the medium of two contacts making connection with the local or relay circuit. One of these contacts was fixed, while the other was carried by the vibrating arm; and, as the latter made its forward and backward movements, these contacts were alternately brought together or separated, thus throwing in and out of circuit the battery and sounder in the local circuit and causing a repetition of the incoming signals. The other side of the local circuit was permanently connected to an insulated block on the vibrator. This device not only worked with great rapidity, but was extremely sensitive, and would respond to currents too weak to affect the most delicate electromagnetic relay. It should be stated that Edison did not confine himself to the working of the electromotograph by the slipping of surfaces through the action of incoming current, but by varying the character of the surfaces in contact the frictional effect might be intensified by the electrical current. In such a case the movements would be the reverse of those above indicated, but the end sought—namely, the relaying of messages—would be attained with the same certainty.
This brings us to the essence of the clever way Edison replaced the action of electrochemical decomposition with that of the electromagnet to operate a relay. The actual relaying was done through two contacts connecting with the local or relay circuit. One contact was fixed, while the other was attached to the vibrating arm; as the latter moved back and forth, these contacts were alternately brought together or separated, thus connecting and disconnecting the battery and sounder in the local circuit, which repeated the incoming signals. The other side of the local circuit was permanently connected to an insulated block on the vibrator. This device not only worked very quickly, but it was also extremely sensitive, responding to currents too weak to affect the most delicate electromagnetic relay. It's worth noting that Edison didn’t just operate the electromotograph by the sliding of surfaces through incoming current; by changing the type of surfaces in contact, the frictional effect could be heightened by the electrical current. In this scenario, the movements would be the opposite of those mentioned above, but the goal—relaying messages—would still be achieved with the same reliability.
While the principal object of this invention was to accomplish the repetition of signals without the aid of an electromagnetic relay, the instrument devised by Edison was capable of use as a recorder also, by employing a small wheel inked by a fountain wheel and attached to the vibrating arm through suitable mechanism. By means of this adjunct the dashes and dots of the transmitted impulses could be recorded upon a paper ribbon passing continuously over the drum.
While the main goal of this invention was to repeat signals without using an electromagnetic relay, the device created by Edison could also function as a recorder. It used a small wheel, inked by a fountain wheel, that was connected to the vibrating arm through an appropriate mechanism. With this addition, the dashes and dots of the transmitted signals could be recorded on a continuously moving paper ribbon over the drum.
The electromotograph is shown diagrammatically in Figs. 1 and 2, in plan and vertical section respectively. The reference letters in each case indicate identical parts: A being the chalk drum, B the paper tape, C the auxiliary cylinder, D the vibrating arm, E the frictional pad, F the spring, G and H the two contacts, I and J the two wires leading to local circuit, K a battery, and L an ordinary telegraph key. The two last named, K and L, are shown to make the sketch complete but in practice would be at the transmitting end, which might be hundreds of miles away. It will be understood, of course, that the electromotograph is a receiving and relaying instrument.
The electromotograph is illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2, showing a top view and a side view, respectively. The reference letters for each part are the same: A is the chalk drum, B is the paper tape, C is the auxiliary cylinder, D is the vibrating arm, E is the frictional pad, F is the spring, G and H are the two contacts, I and J are the two wires going to the local circuit, K is a battery, and L is a standard telegraph key. The last two, K and L, are included to complete the diagram, but in reality, they would be at the transmitting end, which could be hundreds of miles away. It's important to note that the electromotograph serves as both a receiving and relaying device.
Another notable use of the electromotograph principle was in its adaptation to the receiver in Edison's loud-speaking telephone, on which United States Patent No. 221,957 was issued November 25, 1879. A chalk cylinder moistened with a chemical solution was revolved by hand or a small motor. Resting on the cylinder was a palladium-faced pen or spring, which was attached to a mica diaphragm in a resonator. The current passed from the main line through the pen to the chalk and to the battery. The sound-waves impinging upon the distant transmitter varied the resistance of the carbon button therein, thus causing corresponding variations in the strength of the battery current. These variations, passing through the chalk cylinder produced more or less electrochemical decomposition, which in turn caused differences of adhesion between the pen and cylinder and hence gave rise to mechanical vibrations of the diaphragm by reason of which the speaker's words were reproduced. Telephones so operated repeated speaking and singing in very loud tones. In one instance, spoken words and the singing of songs originating at a distance were heard perfectly by an audience of over five thousand people.
Another significant application of the electromotograph principle was its use in the receiver of Edison's loud-speaking telephone, for which United States Patent No. 221,957 was issued on November 25, 1879. A chalk cylinder moistened with a chemical solution was turned by hand or a small motor. A palladium-faced pen or spring rested on the cylinder and was connected to a mica diaphragm in a resonator. The current flowed from the main line through the pen to the chalk and into the battery. The sound waves hitting the distant transmitter changed the resistance of the carbon button inside, leading to corresponding changes in the strength of the battery current. These variations, moving through the chalk cylinder, caused more or less electrochemical decomposition, which in turn created differences in adhesion between the pen and cylinder. This resulted in mechanical vibrations of the diaphragm that reproduced the speaker's words. Telephones using this method could repeat speech and songs in very loud volumes. In one case, spoken words and singing from a distance were clearly heard by an audience of over five thousand people.
The loud-speaking telephone is shown in section, diagrammatically, in the sketch (Fig. 3), in which A is the chalk cylinder mounted on a shaft, B. The palladium-faced pen or spring, C, is connected to diaphragm D. The instrument in its commercial form is shown in Fig. 4.
The loud-speaking telephone is illustrated in section, diagrammatically, in the sketch (Fig. 3), where A is the chalk cylinder mounted on a shaft, B. The palladium-faced pen or spring, C, is attached to diaphragm D. The instrument in its commercial form is displayed in Fig. 4.
VI. THE TELEPHONE
ON April 27, 1877, Edison filed in the United States Patent Office an application for a patent on a telephone, and on May 3, 1892, more than fifteen years afterward, Patent No. 474,230 was granted thereon. Numerous other patents have been issued to him for improvements in telephones, but the one above specified may be considered as the most important of them, since it is the one that first discloses the principle of the carbon transmitter.
ON April 27, 1877, Edison submitted an application for a patent on a telephone to the United States Patent Office, and on May 3, 1892, more than fifteen years later, Patent No. 474,230 was granted. Many other patents have been issued to him for improvements in telephones, but the one mentioned above is considered the most important, as it is the first to reveal the principle of the carbon transmitter.
This patent embodies but two claims, which are as follows:
This patent includes only two claims, which are as follows:
"1. In a speaking-telegraph transmitter, the combination of a metallic diaphragm and disk of plumbago or equivalent material, the contiguous faces of said disk and diaphragm being in contact, substantially as described.
"1. In a speaking-telegraph transmitter, the combination of a metal diaphragm and a disk made of plumbago or similar material, with the adjacent surfaces of the disk and diaphragm touching, essentially as described."
"2. As a means for effecting a varying surface contact in the circuit of a speaking-telegraph transmitter, the combination of two electrodes, one of plumbago or similar material, and both having broad surfaces in vibratory contact with each other, substantially as described."
"2. To create a changing surface contact in the circuit of a speaking-telegraph transmitter, the combination of two electrodes, one made of graphite or a similar material, both with wide surfaces that vibrate against each other, as described."
The advance that was brought about by Edison's carbon transmitter will be more apparent if we glance first at the state of the art of telephony prior to his invention.
The progress introduced by Edison's carbon transmitter will be clearer if we first look at the state of telephony before his invention.
Bell was undoubtedly the first inventor of the art of transmitting speech over an electric circuit, but, with his particular form of telephone, the field was circumscribed. Bell's telephone is shown in the diagrammatic sectional sketch (Fig. 1).
Bell was definitely the first inventor of the method to transmit speech over an electric circuit, but his specific type of telephone had its limitations. Bell's telephone is illustrated in the diagrammatic sectional sketch (Fig. 1).
In the drawing M is a bar magnet contained in the rubber case, L. A bobbin, or coil of wire, B, surrounds one end of the magnet. A diaphragm of soft iron is shown at D, and E is the mouthpiece. The wire terminals of the coil, B, connect with the binding screws, C C.
In the drawing, M is a bar magnet inside the rubber case, L. A coil of wire, B, wraps around one end of the magnet. A soft iron diaphragm is shown at D, and E is the mouthpiece. The wire terminals of the coil, B, connect to the binding screws, CC.
The next illustration shows a pair of such telephones connected for use, the working parts only being designated by the above reference letters.
The next illustration shows a pair of these telephones connected for use, with only the working parts labeled by the reference letters above.
It will be noted that the wire terminals are here put to their proper uses, two being joined together to form a line of communication, and the other two being respectively connected to "ground."
It should be noted that the wire terminals are being used correctly here, with two connected together to create a communication line, and the other two being connected to "ground."
Now, if we imagine a person at each one of the instruments (Fig. 2) we shall find that when one of them speaks the sound vibrations impinge upon the diaphragm and cause it to act as a vibrating armature. By reason of its vibrations, this diaphragm induces very weak electric impulses in the magnetic coil. These impulses, according to Bell's theory, correspond in form to the sound-waves, and, passing over the line, energize the magnet coil at the receiving end, thus giving rise to corresponding variations in magnetism by reason of which the receiving diaphragm is similarly vibrated so as to reproduce the sounds. A single apparatus at each end is therefore sufficient, performing the double function of transmitter and receiver. It will be noticed that in this arrangement no battery is used The strength of the impulses transmitted is therefore limited to that of the necessarily weak induction currents generated by the original sounds minus any loss arising by reason of resistance in the line.
Now, if we picture someone at each of the instruments (Fig. 2), we’ll see that when one of them makes a sound, the sound vibrations hit the diaphragm and make it act like a vibrating piece. Because of its vibrations, this diaphragm creates very weak electric impulses in the magnetic coil. According to Bell's theory, these impulses match the shape of the sound waves and travel along the line to energize the magnet coil at the receiving end. This results in corresponding changes in magnetism, causing the receiving diaphragm to vibrate in a way that reproduces the sounds. Therefore, just one device at each end is enough to serve both as a transmitter and a receiver. It's important to note that in this setup, no battery is used. The strength of the impulses transmitted is therefore limited to that of the weak induction currents created by the original sounds, minus any loss due to resistance in the line.
Edison's carbon transmitter overcame this vital or limiting weakness by providing for independent power on the transmission circuit, and by introducing the principle of varying the resistance of that circuit with changes in the pressure. With Edison's telephone there is used a closed circuit on which a battery current constantly flows, and in that circuit is a pair of electrodes, one or both of which is carbon. These electrodes are always in contact with a certain initial pressure, so that current will be always flowing over the circuit. One of the electrodes is connected with the diaphragm on which the sound-waves impinge, and the vibrations of this diaphragm cause corresponding variations in pressure between the electrodes, and thereby effect similar variations in the current which is passing over the line to the receiving end. This current, flowing around the receiving magnet, causes corresponding impulses therein, which, acting upon its diaphragm, effect a reproduction of the original vibrations and hence of the original sounds.
Edison's carbon transmitter addressed this crucial limitation by allowing independent power on the transmission circuit and by introducing the concept of changing the resistance of that circuit with variations in pressure. In Edison's telephone, a closed circuit continuously carries battery current, and within that circuit are a pair of electrodes, one or both made of carbon. These electrodes are always under a specific initial pressure, ensuring that current flows continuously through the circuit. One of the electrodes is attached to the diaphragm that receives sound waves, and the vibrations of this diaphragm lead to corresponding changes in pressure between the electrodes, which in turn create similar variations in the current traveling to the receiving end. This current, flowing around the receiving magnet, generates corresponding impulses that, acting on its diaphragm, reproduce the original vibrations and, therefore, the original sounds.
In other words, the essential difference is that with Bell's telephone the sound-waves themselves generate the electric impulses, which are therefore extremely faint. With Edison's telephone the sound-waves simply actuate an electric valve, so to speak, and permit variations in a current of any desired strength.
In other words, the key difference is that with Bell's telephone, the sound waves themselves create the electric impulses, which are very weak. With Edison's telephone, the sound waves just trigger an electric valve, so to speak, and allow for changes in a current of any desired strength.
A second distinction between the two telephones is this: With the Bell apparatus the very weak electric impulses generated by the vibration of the transmitting diaphragm pass over the entire line to the receiving end, and, in consequence, the possible length of line is limited to a few miles, even under ideal conditions. With Edison's telephone the battery current does not flow on the main line, but passes through the primary circuit of an induction-coil, from the secondary of which corresponding impulses of enormously higher potential are sent out on the main line to the receiving end. In consequence, the line may be hundreds of miles in length. No modern telephone system is in use to-day that does not use these characteristic features: the varying resistance and the induction-coil. The system inaugurated by Edison is shown by the diagram (Fig. 3), in which the carbon transmitter, the induction-coil, the line, and the distant receiver are respectively indicated.
A second difference between the two telephones is this: With the Bell device, the very weak electric signals generated by the vibration of the transmitting diaphragm travel across the entire line to the receiving end. As a result, the possible length of the line is limited to a few miles, even under ideal conditions. With Edison's telephone, the battery current doesn't flow on the main line; instead, it goes through the primary circuit of an induction coil, and from the secondary, much stronger signals are sent along the main line to the receiving end. Because of this, the line can be hundreds of miles long. No modern telephone system used today operates without incorporating these key features: varying resistance and the induction coil. The system introduced by Edison is illustrated in the diagram (Fig. 3), which shows the carbon transmitter, the induction coil, the line, and the distant receiver.
In Fig. 4 an early form of the Edison carbon transmitter is represented in sectional view.
In Fig. 4, an early version of the Edison carbon transmitter is shown in a sectional view.
The carbon disk is represented by the black portion, E, near the diaphragm, A, placed between two platinum plates D and G, which are connected in the battery circuit, as shown by the lines. A small piece of rubber tubing, B, is attached to the centre of the metallic diaphragm, and presses lightly against an ivory piece, F, which is placed directly over one of the platinum plates. Whenever, therefore, any motion is given to the diaphragm, it is immediately followed by a corresponding pressure upon the carbon, and by a change of resistance in the latter, as described above.
The carbon disk is represented by the black area, E, near the diaphragm, A, which is positioned between two platinum plates, D and G, that are connected in the battery circuit, as indicated by the lines. A small piece of rubber tubing, B, is attached to the center of the metallic diaphragm and presses lightly against an ivory piece, F, placed directly over one of the platinum plates. So, whenever the diaphragm moves, it creates corresponding pressure on the carbon, leading to a change in resistance in the carbon, as described above.
It is interesting to note the position which Edison occupies in the telephone art from a legal standpoint. To this end the reader's attention is called to a few extracts from a decision of Judge Brown in two suits brought in the United States Circuit Court, District of Massachusetts, by the American Bell Telephone Company against the National Telephone Manufacturing Company, et al., and Century Telephone Company, et al., reported in Federal Reporter, 109, page 976, et seq. These suits were brought on the Berliner patent, which, it was claimed, covered broadly the electrical transmission of speech by variations of pressure between opposing electrodes in constant contact. The Berliner patent was declared invalid, and in the course of a long and exhaustive opinion, in which the state of art and the work of Bell, Edison, Berliner, and others was fully discussed, the learned Judge made the following remarks: "The carbon electrode was the invention of Edison.... Edison preceded Berliner in the transmission of speech.... The carbon transmitter was an experimental invention of a very high order of merit.... Edison, by countless experiments, succeeded in advancing the art. . . . That Edison did produce speech with solid electrodes before Berliner is clearly proven.... The use of carbon in a transmitter is, beyond controversy, the invention of Edison. Edison was the first to make apparatus in which carbon was used as one of the electrodes.... The carbon transmitter displaced Bell's magnetic transmitter, and, under several forms of construction, remains the only commercial instrument.... The advance in the art was due to the carbon electrode of Edison.... It is conceded that the Edison transmitter as apparatus is a very important invention.... An immense amount of painstaking and highly ingenious experiment preceded Edison's successful result. The discovery of the availability of carbon was unquestionably invention, and it resulted in the 'first practical success in the art.'"
It’s interesting to note Edison’s position in the telephone industry from a legal perspective. To illustrate this, I’d like to highlight a few excerpts from a ruling by Judge Brown in two cases filed in the United States Circuit Court, District of Massachusetts, by the American Bell Telephone Company against the National Telephone Manufacturing Company, et al., and Century Telephone Company, et al., as reported in Federal Reporter, 109, page 976, et seq. These cases were centered around the Berliner patent, which claimed to cover broadly the electrical transmission of speech through variations in pressure between opposing electrodes in constant contact. The Berliner patent was deemed invalid, and in the course of a detailed and thorough opinion that discussed the state of the art and the contributions of Bell, Edison, Berliner, and others, the Judge remarked: "The carbon electrode was the invention of Edison.... Edison preceded Berliner in the transmission of speech.... The carbon transmitter was an experimental invention of great merit.... Through countless experiments, Edison advanced the field.... It is clearly proven that Edison produced speech with solid electrodes before Berliner.... The use of carbon in a transmitter is, without a doubt, Edison’s invention. Edison was the first to create equipment that used carbon as one of the electrodes.... The carbon transmitter replaced Bell’s magnetic transmitter and, in several variations, remains the only commercial instrument.... The advancements in the field were due to Edison’s carbon electrode.... It is recognized that the Edison transmitter as a device is a very significant invention.... A vast amount of meticulous and clever experimentation led to Edison's successful results. The discovery of carbon’s potential was undoubtedly an invention, and it led to the 'first practical success in the art.'"
VII. EDISON'S TASIMETER
THIS interesting and remarkable device is one of Edison's many inventions not generally known to the public at large, chiefly because the range of its application has been limited to the higher branches of science. He never applied for a patent on the instrument, but dedicated it to the public.
THIS interesting and remarkable device is one of Edison's many inventions not widely known to the general public, mainly because its uses have been restricted to advanced scientific fields. He never applied for a patent on the instrument, but instead devoted it to the public.
The device was primarily intended for use in detecting and measuring infinitesimal degrees of temperature, however remote, and its conception followed Edison's researches on the carbon telephone transmitter. Its principle depends upon the variable resistance of carbon in accordance with the degree of pressure to which it is subjected. By means of this instrument, pressures that are otherwise inappreciable and undiscoverable may be observed and indicated.
The device was mainly designed to detect and measure very small changes in temperature, no matter how slight, and it was inspired by Edison's work on the carbon telephone transmitter. Its function relies on the changing resistance of carbon based on the amount of pressure it experiences. With this instrument, pressures that would usually go unnoticed can be detected and measured.
The detection of small variations of temperatures is brought about through the changes which heat or cold will produce in a sensitive material placed in contact with a carbon button, which is put in circuit with a battery and delicate galvanometer. In the sketch (Fig. 1) there is illustrated, partly in section, the form of tasimeter which Edison took with him to Rawlins, Wyoming, in July, 1878, on the expedition to observe the total eclipse of the sun.
The detection of slight temperature changes is achieved through the effects that heat or cold have on a sensitive material in contact with a carbon button, which is connected to a battery and a sensitive galvanometer. In the illustration (Fig. 1), you can see, partially in section, the design of the tasimeter that Edison took with him to Rawlins, Wyoming, in July 1878, during the expedition to observe the total solar eclipse.
The substance on whose expansion the working of the instrument depends is a strip of some material extremely sensitive to heat, such as vulcanite. shown at A, and firmly clamped at B. Its lower end fits into a slot in a metal plate, C, which in turn rests upon a carbon button. This latter and the metal plate are connected in an electric circuit which includes a battery and a sensitive galvanometer. A vulcanite or other strip is easily affected by differences of temperature, expanding and contracting by reason of the minutest changes. Thus, an infinitesimal variation in its length through expansion or contraction changes the pressure on the carbon and affects the resistance of the circuit to a corresponding degree, thereby causing a deflection of the galvanometer; a movement of the needle in one direction denoting expansion, and in the other contraction. The strip, A, is first put under a slight pressure, deflecting the needle a few degrees from zero. Any subsequent expansion or contraction of the strip may readily be noted by further movements of the needle. In practice, and for measurements of a very delicate nature, the tasimeter is inserted in one arm of a Wheatstone bridge, as shown at A in the diagram (Fig. 2). The galvanometer is shown at B in the bridge wire, and at C, D, and E there are shown the resistances in the other arms of the bridge, which are adjusted to equal the resistance of the tasimeter circuit. The battery is shown at F. This arrangement tends to obviate any misleading deflections that might arise through changes in the battery.
The device's operation relies on a strip of highly heat-sensitive material, like vulcanite, shown at A, which is securely clamped at B. Its lower end fits into a slot in a metal plate, C, that rests on a carbon button. This carbon button and the metal plate are part of an electric circuit that includes a battery and a sensitive galvanometer. A vulcanite or similar strip easily responds to temperature changes, expanding and contracting with even the smallest fluctuations. Consequently, a tiny change in its length through expansion or contraction alters the pressure on the carbon and affects the circuit's resistance, causing the galvanometer to deflect; movement of the needle in one direction indicates expansion, while movement in the opposite direction indicates contraction. The strip, A, is initially placed under slight pressure, causing the needle to move a few degrees from zero. Any further expansion or contraction of the strip can be observed by additional needle movements. In practice, for very delicate measurements, the tasimeter is placed in one arm of a Wheatstone bridge, as shown at A in the diagram (Fig. 2). The galvanometer is indicated at B in the bridge wire, while C, D, and E represent the resistances in the other arms of the bridge, adjusted to match the resistance of the tasimeter circuit. The battery is indicated at F. This setup helps eliminate any misleading deflections that may occur due to changes in the battery.
The dial on the front of the instrument is intended to indicate the exact amount of physical expansion or contraction of the strip. This is ascertained by means of a micrometer screw, S, which moves a needle, T, in front of the dial. This screw engages with a second and similar screw which is so arranged as to move the strip of vulcanite up or down. After a galvanometer deflection has been obtained through the expansion or contraction of the strip by reason of a change of temperature, a similar deflection is obtained mechanically by turning the screw, S, one way or the other. This causes the vulcanite strip to press more or less upon the carbon button, and thus produces the desired change in the resistance of the circuit. When the galvanometer shows the desired deflection, the needle, T, will indicate upon the dial, in decimal fractions of an inch, the exact distance through which the strip has been moved.
The dial on the front of the device shows the exact amount of physical expansion or contraction of the strip. This is determined using a micrometer screw, S, which moves a needle, T, in front of the dial. This screw connects to a second similar screw that is designed to move the vulcanite strip up or down. After a galvanometer deflection is achieved through the expansion or contraction of the strip due to a temperature change, a similar deflection is mechanically obtained by turning the screw, S, in either direction. This adjusts the pressure of the vulcanite strip on the carbon button, resulting in the desired change in the circuit's resistance. When the galvanometer shows the desired deflection, the needle, T, indicates on the dial, in decimal fractions of an inch, the exact distance the strip has moved.
With such an instrument as the above, Edison demonstrated the existence of heat in the corona at the above-mentioned total eclipse of the sun, but exact determinations could not be made at that time, because the tasimeter adjustment was too delicate, and at the best the galvanometer deflections were so marked that they could not be kept within the limits of the scale. The sensitiveness of the instrument may be easily comprehended when it is stated that the heat of the hand thirty feet away from the cone-like funnel of the tasimeter will so affect the galvanometer as to cause the spot of light to leave the scale.
Using the instrument described above, Edison showed that there was heat in the corona during the aforementioned total solar eclipse, but precise measurements couldn't be taken at that time because the tasimeter setup was too sensitive. Even under optimal conditions, the galvanometer readings were so strong that they couldn't be maintained within the scale limits. The sensitivity of the instrument is clear when you consider that the heat from a hand thirty feet away from the cone-shaped funnel of the tasimeter can influence the galvanometer enough to make the light spot move off the scale.
This instrument can also be used to indicate minute changes of moisture in the air by substituting a strip of gelatine in place of the vulcanite. When so arranged a moistened piece of paper held several feet away will cause a minute expansion of the gelatine strip, which effects a pressure on the carbon, and causes a variation in the circuit sufficient to throw the spot of light from the galvanometer mirror off the scale.
This device can also be used to show minor changes in moisture in the air by replacing the vulcanite with a strip of gelatin. When set up this way, a damp piece of paper held several feet away will cause the gelatin strip to slightly expand, creating pressure on the carbon, which results in a change in the circuit strong enough to move the spot of light from the galvanometer mirror off the scale.
The tasimeter has been used to demonstrate heat from remote stars (suns), such as Arcturus.
The tasimeter has been used to show heat from distant stars (suns), like Arcturus.
VIII. THE EDISON PHONOGRAPH
THE first patent that was ever granted on a device for permanently recording the human voice and other sounds, and for reproducing the same audibly at any future time, was United States Patent No. 200,251, issued to Thomas A. Edison on February 19, 1878, the application having been filed December 24, 1877. It is worthy of note that no references whatever were cited against the application while under examination in the Patent Office. This invention therefore, marked the very beginning of an entirely new art, which, with the new industries attendant upon its development, has since grown to occupy a position of worldwide reputation.
The first patent ever granted for a device that could permanently record the human voice and other sounds, and play them back audibly at any later time, was United States Patent No. 200,251, issued to Thomas A. Edison on February 19, 1878, with the application filed on December 24, 1877. It's important to note that no references were cited against the application during its review in the Patent Office. This invention marked the very beginning of a completely new industry, which has since grown into a globally recognized field.
That the invention was of a truly fundamental character is also evident from the fact that although all "talking-machines" of to-day differ very widely in refinement from the first crude but successful phonograph of Edison, their performance is absolutely dependent upon the employment of the principles stated by him in his Patent No. 200,251. Quoting from the specification attached to this patent, we find that Edison said:
That the invention was truly groundbreaking is also clear from the fact that even though all today's "talking machines" are very different in refinement from Edison's first rough but successful phonograph, their performance entirely relies on the principles he outlined in his Patent No. 200,251. Quoting from the specification attached to this patent, we find that Edison said:
"The invention consists in arranging a plate, diaphragm or other flexible body capable of being vibrated by the human voice or other sounds, in conjunction with a material capable of registering the movements of such vibrating body by embossing or indenting or altering such material, in such a manner that such register marks will be sufficient to cause a second vibrating plate or body to be set in motion by them, and thus reproduce the motions of the first vibrating body."
"The invention involves setting up a plate, diaphragm, or another flexible material that can vibrate in response to the human voice or other sounds, alongside a material that can capture the movements of this vibrating body by embossing, indenting, or changing the material. This setup allows the registration marks created to be strong enough to make a second vibrating plate or body move, thereby reproducing the motions of the first vibrating body."
It will be at once obvious that these words describe perfectly the basic principle of every modern phonograph or other talking-machine, irrespective of its manufacture or trade name.
It will be immediately clear that these words perfectly describe the basic principle of every modern phonograph or other talking machine, regardless of its brand or manufacturer.
Edison's first model of the phonograph is shown in the following illustration.
Edison's first model of the phonograph is shown in the illustration below.
It consisted of a metallic cylinder having a helical indenting groove cut upon it from end to end. This cylinder was mounted on a shaft supported on two standards. This shaft at one end was fitted with a handle, by means of which the cylinder was rotated. There were two diaphragms, one on each side of the cylinder, one being for recording and the other for reproducing speech or other sounds. Each diaphragm had attached to it a needle. By means of the needle attached to the recording diaphragm, indentations were made in a sheet of tin-foil stretched over the peripheral surface of the cylinder when the diaphragm was vibrated by reason of speech or other sounds. The needle on the other diaphragm subsequently followed these indentations, thus reproducing the original sounds.
It was a metallic cylinder with a helical groove cut into it from end to end. This cylinder was mounted on a shaft supported by two stands. One end of the shaft had a handle that allowed the cylinder to be rotated. There were two diaphragms, one on each side of the cylinder—one for recording and the other for reproducing speech or other sounds. Each diaphragm had a needle attached to it. The needle on the recording diaphragm made indentations on a sheet of tin foil stretched over the cylinder's surface when the diaphragm vibrated due to speech or other sounds. The needle on the other diaphragm then followed these indentations, reproducing the original sounds.
Crude as this first model appears in comparison with machines of later development and refinement, it embodied their fundamental essentials, and was in fact a complete, practical phonograph from the first moment of its operation.
Rough as this first model looks compared to later machines that have been developed and refined, it included the basic essentials and was actually a complete, functional phonograph from the very start of its operation.
The next step toward the evolution of the improved phonograph of to-day was another form of tin-foil machine, as seen in the illustration.
The next step toward the evolution of today's improved phonograph was another type of tin-foil machine, as shown in the illustration.
It will be noted that this was merely an elaborated form of the first model, and embodied several mechanical modifications, among which was the employment of only one diaphragm for recording and reproducing. Such was the general type of phonograph used for exhibition purposes in America and other countries in the three or four years immediately succeeding the date of this invention.
It should be noted that this was just a more developed version of the original model, featuring several mechanical upgrades, including the use of a single diaphragm for both recording and playback. This was the typical type of phonograph used for demonstrations in the U.S. and other countries in the three or four years following this invention.
In operating the machine the recording diaphragm was advanced nearly to the cylinder, so that as the diaphragm was vibrated by the voice the needle would prick or indent a wave-like record in the tin-foil that was on the cylinder. The cylinder was constantly turned during the recording, and in turning, was simultaneously moved forward. Thus the record would be formed on the tin-foil in a continuous spiral line. To reproduce this record it was only necessary to again start at the beginning and cause the needle to retrace its path in the spiral line. The needle, in passing rapidly in contact with the recorded waves, was vibrated up and down, causing corresponding vibrations of the diaphragm. In this way sound-waves similar to those caused by the original sounds would be set up in the air, thus reproducing the original speech.
In operating the machine, the recording diaphragm was brought close to the cylinder so that when the diaphragm vibrated with the voice, the needle would create a wave-like imprint in the tin foil on the cylinder. The cylinder continuously rotated during the recording, and as it turned, it was also moved forward. This way, the record was formed on the tin foil in a continuous spiral line. To play back this record, all that was needed was to start at the beginning and let the needle follow the spiral path again. As the needle moved quickly along the recorded waves, it vibrated up and down, causing the diaphragm to vibrate as well. This created sound waves similar to the original sounds, effectively reproducing the original speech.
The modern phonograph operates in a precisely similar way, the only difference being in details of refinement. Instead of tin-foil, a wax cylinder is employed, the record being cut thereon by a cutting-tool attached to a diaphragm, while the reproduction is effected by means of a blunt stylus similarly attached.
The modern phonograph works in exactly the same way, with the only difference being in the finer details. Instead of tin-foil, a wax cylinder is used, where the record is cut by a cutting tool connected to a diaphragm, while playback is done using a blunt stylus that is similarly attached.
The cutting-tool and stylus are devices made of sapphire, a gem next in hardness to a diamond, and they have to be cut and formed to an exact nicety by means of diamond dust, most of the work being performed under high-powered microscopes. The minute proportions of these devices will be apparent by a glance at the accompanying illustrations, in which the object on the left represents a common pin, and the objects on the right the cutting-tool and reproducing stylus, all actual sizes.
The cutting tool and stylus are made of sapphire, a gem that's second in hardness only to diamond, and they must be shaped precisely using diamond dust, with most of the work done under high-powered microscopes. You can see the tiny sizes of these devices in the accompanying illustrations, where the object on the left is a common pin, and the objects on the right are the cutting tool and reproducing stylus, all at actual size.
In the next illustration (Fig. 4) there is shown in the upper sketch, greatly magnified, the cutting or recording tool in the act of forming the record, being vibrated rapidly by the diaphragm; and in the lower sketch, similarly enlarged, a representation of the stylus travelling over the record thus made, in the act of effecting a reproduction.
In the next illustration (Fig. 4), the upper sketch shows the cutting or recording tool, significantly magnified, in the process of creating the record, rapidly vibrating thanks to the diaphragm. In the lower sketch, also enlarged, there's a depiction of the stylus moving over the record that was created, in the act of reproducing it.
From the late summer of 1878 and to the fall of 1887 Edison was intensely busy on the electric light, electric railway, and other problems, and virtually gave no attention to the phonograph. Hence, just prior to the latter-named period the instrument was still in its tin-foil age; but he then began to devote serious attention to the development of an improved type that should be of greater commercial importance. The practical results are too well known to call for further comment. That his efforts were not limited in extent may be inferred from the fact that since the fall of 1887 to the present writing he has been granted in the United States one hundred and four patents relating to the phonograph and its accessories.
From late summer 1878 to fall 1887, Edison was extremely focused on electric light, electric railways, and other projects, and he pretty much ignored the phonograph. So, just before this period, the device was still in its tin-foil stage; however, he then started to seriously concentrate on developing an improved version that would be more commercially viable. The practical outcomes are widely recognized, so there's little need to elaborate. The fact that his efforts were extensive is evident from the one hundred and four patents related to the phonograph and its accessories that he has been granted in the United States since fall 1887 up to now.
Interesting as the numerous inventions are, it would be a work of supererogation to digest all these patents in the present pages, as they represent not only the inception but also the gradual development and growth of the wax-record type of phonograph from its infancy to the present perfected machine and records now so widely known all over the world. From among these many inventions, however, we will select two or three as examples of ingenuity and importance in their bearing upon present perfection of results.
As interesting as the many inventions are, it would be excessive to go through all these patents in this space, as they show not just the beginning but also the gradual development and evolution of the wax-record type of phonograph from its early days to the modern, perfected machines and records that are now widely recognized around the world. However, from these numerous inventions, we will choose two or three as examples of cleverness and significance in relation to the current level of excellence in results.
One of the difficulties of reproduction for many years was the trouble experienced in keeping the stylus in perfect engagement with the wave-like record, so that every minute vibration would be reproduced. It should be remembered that the deepest cut of the recording tool is only about one-third the thickness of tissue-paper. Hence, it will be quite apparent that the slightest inequality in the surface of the wax would be sufficient to cause false vibration, and thus give rise to distorted effects in such music or other sounds as were being reproduced. To remedy this, Edison added an attachment which is called a "floating weight," and is shown at A in the illustration above.
One of the big challenges with reproduction for many years was keeping the stylus perfectly in contact with the wavy record, so that every tiny vibration would be reproduced. It's important to remember that the deepest cut made by the recording tool is only about one-third the thickness of tissue paper. Therefore, it’s clear that even the slightest imperfection on the surface of the wax could cause false vibrations, leading to distortions in the music or other sounds being reproduced. To fix this issue, Edison added an attachment called a "floating weight," which is shown at A in the illustration above.
The function of the floating weight is to automatically keep the stylus in close engagement with the record, thus insuring accuracy of reproduction. The weight presses the stylus to its work, but because of its mass it cannot respond to the extremely rapid vibrations of the stylus. They are therefore communicated to the diaphragm.
The purpose of the floating weight is to automatically keep the stylus closely in contact with the record, ensuring accurate playback. The weight pushes the stylus down to do its job, but because of its mass, it can't keep up with the very quick vibrations of the stylus. Instead, those vibrations are transmitted to the diaphragm.
Some of Edison's most remarkable inventions are revealed in a number of interesting patents relating to the duplication of phonograph records. It would be obviously impossible, from a commercial standpoint, to obtain a musical record from a high-class artist and sell such an original to the public, as its cost might be from one hundred to several thousand dollars. Consequently, it is necessary to provide some way by which duplicates may be made cheaply enough to permit their purchase by the public at a reasonable price.
Some of Edison's most impressive inventions are shown in several interesting patents related to making copies of phonograph records. It would clearly be impractical, from a business perspective, to obtain a musical record from a top artist and sell that original to the public, as its price could range from one hundred to several thousand dollars. Therefore, it’s essential to create a method for producing duplicates affordably enough for the public to buy them at a reasonable price.
The making of a perfect original musical or other record is a matter of no small difficulty, as it requires special technical knowledge and skill gathered from many years of actual experience; but in the exact copying, or duplication, of such a record, with its many millions of microscopic waves and sub-waves, the difficulties are enormously increased. The duplicates must be microscopically identical with the original, they must be free from false vibrations or other defects, although both original and duplicates are of such easily defacable material as wax; and the process must be cheap and commercial not a scientific laboratory possibility.
Creating a perfect original musical or recording is quite challenging, as it requires specialized technical knowledge and skills gained from years of hands-on experience. However, the task of accurately copying or duplicating such a record, which has millions of microscopic waves and sub-waves, adds an entirely new level of difficulty. The duplicates need to be microscopically identical to the original, free from any false vibrations or defects, despite both the original and the duplicates being made of easily damaged materials like wax. Additionally, the process must be cost-effective and suitable for commercial use, not just something achievable in a scientific lab.
For making duplicates it was obviously necessary to first secure a mold carrying the record in negative or reversed form. From this could be molded, or cast, positive copies which would be identical with the original. While the art of electroplating would naturally suggest itself as the means of making such a mold, an apparently insurmountable obstacle appeared on the very threshold. Wax, being a non-conductor, cannot be electroplated unless a conducting surface be first applied. The coatings ordinarily used in electro-deposition were entirely out of the question on account of coarseness, the deepest waves of the record being less than one-thousandth of an inch in depth, and many of them probably ten to one hundred times as shallow. Edison finally decided to apply a preliminary metallic coating of infinitesimal thinness, and accomplished this object by a remarkable process known as the vacuous deposit. With this he applied to the original record a film of gold probably no thicker than one three-hundred-thousandth of an inch, or several hundred times less than the depth of an average wave. Three hundred such layers placed one on top of the other would make a sheet no thicker than tissue-paper.
To make duplicates, it was clearly necessary to first create a mold that held the record in a negative or reversed form. This mold could then be used to produce positive copies that would be identical to the original. While using electroplating to make such a mold would seem like a natural choice, there was a significant hurdle right from the start. Wax, being a non-conductor, cannot be electroplated unless a conductive surface is applied first. The usual coatings for electro-deposition were not suitable due to their coarseness, as the deepest grooves in the record were less than one-thousandth of an inch deep, and many were probably ten to one hundred times shallower. Edison ultimately decided to use a very thin metallic coating as a preliminary step, and he achieved this using a remarkable process called vacuous deposit. With this method, he applied a film of gold to the original record that was likely no thicker than one three-hundred-thousandth of an inch, or several hundred times thinner than the average groove depth. Three hundred of these layers stacked on top of each other would create a sheet no thicker than tissue paper.
The process consists in placing in a vacuum two leaves, or electrodes, of gold, and between them the original record. A constant discharge of electricity of high tension between the electrodes is effected by means of an induction-coil. The metal is vaporized by this discharge, and is carried by it directly toward and deposited upon the original record, thus forming the minute film of gold above mentioned. The record is constantly rotated until its entire surface is coated. A sectional diagram of the apparatus (Fig. 6.) will aid to a clearer understanding of this ingenious process.
The process involves placing two gold leaves, or electrodes, in a vacuum with the original record between them. A steady discharge of high-voltage electricity is generated between the electrodes using an induction coil. This discharge vaporizes the metal, which is then directed toward and deposited on the original record, creating the thin film of gold mentioned earlier. The record continuously rotates until its entire surface is coated. A sectional diagram of the apparatus (Fig. 6.) will help clarify this clever process.
After the gold film is formed in the manner described above, a heavy backing of baser metal is electroplated upon it, thus forming a substantial mold, from which the original record is extracted by breakage or shrinkage.
Once the gold film is created as described, a thick layer of a less valuable metal is electroplated on it, creating a solid mold, from which the original record is removed by breaking it or allowing it to shrink.
Duplicate records in any quantity may now be made from this mold by surrounding it with a cold-water jacket and dipping it in a molten wax-like material. This congeals on the record surface just as melted butter would collect on a cold knife, and when the mold is removed the surplus wax falls out, leaving a heavy deposit of the material which forms the duplicate record. Numerous ingenious inventions have been made by Edison providing for a variety of rapid and economical methods of duplication, including methods of shrinking a newly made copy to facilitate its quick removal from the mold; methods of reaming, of forming ribs on the interior, and for many other important and essential details, which limits of space will not permit of elaboration. Those mentioned above are but fair examples of the persistent and effective work he has done to bring the phonograph to its present state of perfection.
Duplicate records can now be created from this mold by surrounding it with a cold-water jacket and dipping it into a molten wax-like substance. This solidifies on the record surface just like melted butter would accumulate on a cold knife, and when the mold is taken off, the excess wax falls away, leaving a thick layer of material that makes the duplicate record. Edison has come up with numerous clever inventions for various fast and cost-effective duplication methods, including techniques to shrink a newly made copy for easier removal from the mold; methods for reaming, forming ribs on the inside, and many other important details that I can't elaborate on due to space constraints. The examples mentioned above are just a glimpse of the dedicated and effective work he has done to bring the phonograph to its current level of excellence.
In perusing Chapter X of the foregoing narrative, the reader undoubtedly noted Edison's clear apprehension of the practical uses of the phonograph, as evidenced by his prophetic utterances in the article written by him for the North American Review in June, 1878. In view of the crudity of the instrument at that time, it must be acknowledged that Edison's foresight, as vindicated by later events was most remarkable. No less remarkable was his intensely practical grasp of mechanical possibilities of future types of the machine, for we find in one of his early English patents (No. 1644 of 1878) the disk form of phonograph which, some ten to fifteen years later, was supposed to be a new development in the art. This disk form was also covered by Edison's application for a United States patent, filed in 1879. This application met with some merely minor technical objections in the Patent Office, and seems to have passed into the "abandoned" class for want of prosecution, probably because of being overlooked in the tremendous pressure arising from his development of his electric-lighting system.
While reading Chapter X of the previous narrative, the reader likely noticed Edison's clear understanding of the practical applications of the phonograph, as shown by his insightful remarks in the article he wrote for the North American Review in June 1878. Considering how basic the instrument was at that time, it's impressive how Edison's foresight, confirmed by later developments, stood out. Equally noteworthy was his practical understanding of the mechanical possibilities for future versions of the machine. In one of his early English patents (No. 1644 from 1878), he described the disk form of the phonograph, which was believed to be a new innovation in the field ten to fifteen years later. This disk design was also included in Edison's application for a United States patent submitted in 1879. That application encountered some minor technical objections in the Patent Office and likely ended up being classified as "abandoned" due to a lack of follow-up, probably because it was overshadowed by the intense pressure from his work on the electric lighting system.
IX. THE INCANDESCENT LAMP
IX. THE LIGHT BULB
ALTHOUGH Edison's contributions to human comfort and progress are extensive in number and extraordinarily vast and comprehensive in scope and variety, the universal verdict of the world points to his incandescent lamp and system of distribution of electrical current as the central and crowning achievements of his life up to this time. This view would seem entirely justifiable when we consider the wonderful changes in the conditions of modern life that have been brought about by the wide-spread employment of these inventions, and the gigantic industries that have grown up and been nourished by their world-wide application. That he was in this instance a true pioneer and creator is evident as we consider the subject, for the United States Patent No. 223,898, issued to Edison on January 27, 1880, for an incandescent lamp, was of such fundamental character that it opened up an entirely new and tremendously important art—the art of incandescent electric lighting. This statement cannot be successfully controverted, for it has been abundantly verified after many years of costly litigation. If further proof were desired, it is only necessary to point to the fact that, after thirty years of most strenuous and practical application in the art by the keenest intellects of the world, every incandescent lamp that has ever since been made, including those of modern days, is still dependent upon the employment of the essentials disclosed in the above-named patent—namely, a filament of high resistance enclosed in a sealed glass globe exhausted of air, with conducting wires passing through the glass.
ALTHOUGH Edison's contributions to human comfort and progress are numerous and remarkably wide-ranging in scope and variety, the general consensus is that his incandescent lamp and electrical distribution system are the standout achievements of his life up to this point. This perspective feels entirely justifiable when we consider the incredible changes in modern life brought about by the widespread use of these inventions, alongside the massive industries that have emerged and thrived due to their global application. His role as a true pioneer and creator is clear when we reflect on the fact that United States Patent No. 223,898, granted to Edison on January 27, 1880, for an incandescent lamp, was foundational, leading to a new and critically important field—the art of incandescent electric lighting. This claim cannot be disputed, as it has been thoroughly validated after many years of costly litigation. If more evidence is needed, it's enough to note that, after thirty years of intense and practical application by some of the brightest minds in the world, every incandescent lamp produced since then, including modern ones, still relies on the principles outlined in that patent—specifically, a high-resistance filament enclosed in a sealed glass globe that's been evacuated of air, with conducting wires passing through the glass.
An incandescent lamp is such a simple-appearing article—merely a filament sealed into a glass globe—that its intrinsic relation to the art of electric lighting is far from being apparent at sight. To the lay mind it would seem that this must have been THE obvious device to make in order to obtain electric light by incandescence of carbon or other material. But the reader has already learned from the preceding narrative that prior to its invention by Edison such a device was NOT obvious, even to the most highly trained experts of the world at that period; indeed, it was so far from being obvious that, for some time after he had completed practical lamps and was actually lighting them up twenty-four hours a day, such a device and such a result were declared by these same experts to be an utter impossibility. For a short while the world outside of Menlo Park held Edison's claims in derision. His lamp was pronounced a fake, a myth, possibly a momentary success magnified to the dignity of a permanent device by an overenthusiastic inventor.
An incandescent lamp looks really simple—just a filament inside a glass bulb—so its connection to electric lighting isn't obvious at first glance. To someone unfamiliar with the technology, it might seem like this was clearly the go-to solution for getting electric light through the incandescence of carbon or other materials. However, as we've seen earlier, before Edison invented it, this idea was NOT obvious, even to the most skilled experts of that time; in fact, it was so out of the question that for a while, even after he developed practical lamps and was lighting them continuously, those same experts insisted such a device and outcome were totally impossible. For a short time, people outside of Menlo Park mocked Edison's claims. They labeled his lamp as a fraud, a fiction, or just a temporary success blown out of proportion by an overly excited inventor.
Such criticism, however, did not disturb Edison. He KNEW that he had reached the goal. Long ago, by a close process of reasoning, he had clearly seen that the only road to it was through the path he had travelled, and which was now embodied in the philosophy of his incandescent lamp—namely, a filament, or carbon, of high resistance and small radiating surface, sealed into a glass globe exhausted of air to a high degree of vacuum. In originally committing himself to this line of investigation he was well aware that he was going in a direction diametrically opposite to that followed by previous investigators. Their efforts had been confined to low-resistance burners of large radiating surface for their lamps, but he realized the utter futility of such devices. The tremendous problems of heat and the prohibitive quantities of copper that would be required for conductors for such lamps would be absolutely out of the question in commercial practice.
Such criticism, however, didn't bother Edison. He KNEW he had achieved his goal. Long ago, through careful reasoning, he clearly understood that the only way to get there was by following the path he had taken, which was now reflected in the philosophy of his incandescent lamp—specifically, a filament or carbon with high resistance and a small radiating surface, sealed inside a glass globe that was highly evacuated of air. When he initially committed to this line of investigation, he was fully aware that he was moving in a direction completely opposite to that of previous researchers. Their efforts focused on low-resistance burners with large radiating surfaces for their lamps, but he recognized the total futility of such designs. The enormous issues of heat and the excessive amounts of copper needed for conductors for such lamps would be utterly impractical for commercial use.
He was convinced from the first that the true solution of the problem lay in a lamp which should have as its illuminating body a strip of material which would offer such a resistance to the flow of electric current that it could be raised to a high temperature—incandescence—and be of such small cross-section that it would radiate but little heat. At the same time such a lamp must require a relatively small amount of current, in order that comparatively small conductors could be used, and its burner must be capable of withstanding the necessarily high temperatures without disintegration.
He was convinced from the start that the real solution to the problem was a lamp that had an illuminating element made of a material which would resist the flow of electric current enough to heat up to a high temperature—incandescence—and be small enough that it wouldn’t radiate much heat. At the same time, this lamp needed to use a relatively small amount of current, so that it could use smaller conductors, and its burner had to be able to handle the high temperatures without breaking down.
It is interesting to note that these conceptions were in Edison's mind at an early period of his investigations, when the best expert opinion was that the subdivision of the electric current was an ignis fatuus. Hence we quote the following notes he made, November 15, 1878, in one of the laboratory note-books:
It’s interesting to point out that these ideas were already on Edison’s mind early in his research when the leading expert opinion was that splitting the electric current was a pipe dream. So, we include the following notes he made on November 15, 1878, in one of the laboratory notebooks:
"A given straight wire having 1 ohm resistance and certain length is brought to a given degree of temperature by given battery. If the same wire be coiled in such a manner that but one-quarter of its surface radiates, its temperature will be increased four times with the same battery, or, one-quarter of this battery will bring it to the temperature of straight wire. Or the same given battery will bring a wire whose total resistance is 4 ohms to the same temperature as straight wire.
"A straight wire with 1 ohm of resistance and a certain length is heated to a specific temperature by a given battery. If you coil the same wire so that only one-quarter of its surface radiates, its temperature will increase four times with the same battery, or a quarter of this battery will bring it to the temperature of the straight wire. Alternatively, the same battery will heat a wire with a total resistance of 4 ohms to the same temperature as the straight wire."
"This was actually determined by trial.
This was actually determined through trial.
"The amount of heat lost by a body is in proportion to the radiating surface of that body. If one square inch of platina be heated to 100 degrees it will fall to, say, zero in one second, whereas, if it was at 200 degrees it would require two seconds.
"The amount of heat lost by an object is proportional to the surface area of that object. If one square inch of platinum is heated to 100 degrees, it will drop to, say, zero in one second; however, if it were at 200 degrees, it would take two seconds."
"Hence, in the case of incandescent conductors, if the radiating surface be twelve inches and the temperature on each inch be 100, or 1200 for all, if it is so coiled or arranged that there is but one-quarter, or three inches, of radiating surface, then the temperature on each inch will be 400. If reduced to three-quarters of an inch it will have on that three-quarters of an inch 1600 degrees Fahr., notwithstanding the original total amount was but 1200, because the radiation has been reduced to three-quarters, or 75 units; hence, the effect of the lessening of the radiation is to raise the temperature of each remaining inch not radiating to 125 degrees. If the radiating surface should be reduced to three-thirty-seconds of an inch, the temperature would reach 6400 degrees Fahr. To carry out this law to the best advantage in regard to platina, etc., then with a given length of wire to quadruple the heat we must lessen the radiating surface to one-quarter, and to do this in a spiral, three-quarters must be within the spiral and one-quarter outside for radiating; hence, a square wire or other means, such as a spiral within a spiral, must be used. These results account for the enormous temperature of the Electric Arc with one horse-power; as, for instance, if one horse-power will heat twelve inches of wire to 1000 degrees Fahr., and this is concentrated to have one-quarter of the radiating surface, it would reach a temperature of 4000 degrees or sufficient to melt it; but, supposing it infusible, the further concentration to one-eighth its surface, it would reach a temperature of 16,000 degrees, and to one-thirty-second its surface, which would be about the radiating surface of the Electric Arc, it would reach 64,000 degrees Fahr. Of course, when Light is radiated in great quantities not quite these temperatures would be reached.
So, in the case of incandescent conductors, if the radiating surface is twelve inches and the temperature per inch is 100, making it 1200 for all, but it's coiled or arranged so that only one-quarter, or three inches, of the radiating surface is exposed, then the temperature on each inch will be 400. If we reduce it to three-quarters of an inch, that three-quarters of an inch will have a temperature of 1600 degrees Fahrenheit, even though the original total was just 1200, because the radiation has been reduced to three-quarters, or 75 units. Therefore, the effect of decreasing the radiation raises the temperature of each remaining inch that isn't radiating to 125 degrees. If the radiating surface is cut down to three-thirty-seconds of an inch, the temperature would hit 6400 degrees Fahrenheit. To maximize this principle regarding platinum, if we have a fixed length of wire and want to quadruple the heat, we need to reduce the radiating surface to one-quarter, arranging it in a spiral, with three-quarters inside the spiral and one-quarter outside for radiation. So, a square wire or some method like a spiral within a spiral must be used. These results explain the extremely high temperature of the Electric Arc with just one horse-power; for example, if one horse-power can heat twelve inches of wire to 1000 degrees Fahrenheit and this heat is concentrated to have only one-quarter of the radiating surface, it could reach 4000 degrees, which is enough to melt it. However, if we assume it can't melt, further concentrating it to one-eighth of its surface would bring the temperature to 16,000 degrees, and reducing it to one-thirty-second of its surface, which is similar to the radiating surface of the Electric Arc, would elevate it to 64,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Naturally, when light is radiated in large amounts, these exact temperatures wouldn't necessarily be achieved.
"Another curious law is this: It will require a greater initial battery to bring an iron wire of the same size and resistance to a given temperature than it will a platina wire in proportion to their specific heats, and in the case of Carbon, a piece of Carbon three inches long and one-eighth diameter, with a resistance of 1 ohm, will require a greater battery power to bring it to a given temperature than a cylinder of thin platina foil of the same length, diameter, and resistance, because the specific heat of Carbon is many times greater; besides, if I am not mistaken, the radiation of a roughened body for heat is greater than a polished one like platina."
"Another interesting fact is this: It will take a stronger initial battery to heat an iron wire of the same size and resistance to a certain temperature compared to a platinum wire when you consider their specific heats. Also, for carbon, a piece that's three inches long and one-eighth of an inch in diameter, with a resistance of 1 ohm, will need more battery power to reach a specific temperature than a thin platinum foil of the same length, diameter, and resistance, because carbon's specific heat is much higher. Additionally, if I'm not mistaken, the heat radiation from a rough surface is greater than that from a polished surface like platinum."
Proceeding logically upon these lines of thought and following them out through many ramifications, we have seen how he at length made a filament of carbon of high resistance and small radiating surface, and through a concurrent investigation of the phenomena of high vacua and occluded gases was able to produce a true incandescent lamp. Not only was it a lamp as a mere article—a device to give light—but it was also an integral part of his great and complete system of lighting, to every part of which it bore a fixed and definite ratio, and in relation to which it was the keystone that held the structure firmly in place.
Building on these ideas and exploring them through various implications, we've seen how he ultimately created a carbon filament that had high resistance and a small radiating surface. Through simultaneous research into the effects of high vacuums and trapped gases, he was able to develop a true incandescent lamp. It wasn't just a lamp as a simple tool to provide light; it was also a crucial element of his comprehensive lighting system, where each component had a specific and defined relationship, and it served as the keystone that held the entire structure together.
The work of Edison on incandescent lamps did not stop at this fundamental invention, but extended through more than eighteen years of a most intense portion of his busy life. During that period he was granted one hundred and forty-nine other patents on the lamp and its manufacture. Although very many of these inventions were of the utmost importance and value, we cannot attempt to offer a detailed exposition of them in this necessarily brief article, but must refer the reader, if interested, to the patents themselves, a full list being given at the end of this Appendix. The outline sketch will indicate the principal patents covering the basic features of the lamp.
Edison's work on incandescent lamps didn't stop with this groundbreaking invention; it spanned over eighteen years of his incredibly busy life. During that time, he received one hundred and forty-nine additional patents related to the lamp and its production. While many of these inventions were extremely important and valuable, we can't provide a detailed overview of them in this brief article. Instead, we encourage readers who are interested to check out the patents themselves, with a complete list provided at the end of this Appendix. The following outline will highlight the main patents that cover the essential features of the lamp.
The litigation on the Edison lamp patents was one of the most determined and stubbornly fought contests in the history of modern jurisprudence. Vast interests were at stake. All of the technical, expert, and professional skill and knowledge that money could procure or experience devise were availed of in the bitter fights that raged in the courts for many years. And although the Edison interests had spent from first to last nearly $2,000,000, and had only about three years left in the life of the fundamental patent, Edison was thoroughly sustained as to priority by the decisions in the various suits. We shall offer a few brief extracts from some of these decisions.
The legal battles over the Edison lamp patents were some of the most determined and fiercely contested in the history of modern law. Huge stakes were involved. Every bit of technical, expert, and professional skill and knowledge that money could buy or experience could devise was used in the intense fights that went on in the courts for many years. Even though the Edison interests spent nearly $2,000,000 from start to finish and had only about three years left on the fundamental patent, Edison was consistently supported regarding priority by the rulings in the various cases. We will provide a few brief excerpts from some of these rulings.
In a suit against the United States Electric Lighting Company, United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, July 14, 1891, Judge Wallace said, in his opinion: "The futility of hoping to maintain a burner in vacuo with any permanency had discouraged prior inventors, and Mr. Edison is entitled to the credit of obviating the mechanical difficulties which disheartened them.... He was the first to make a carbon of materials, and by a process which was especially designed to impart high specific resistance to it; the first to make a carbon in the special form for the special purpose of imparting to it high total resistance; and the first to combine such a burner with the necessary adjuncts of lamp construction to prevent its disintegration and give it sufficiently long life. By doing these things he made a lamp which was practically operative and successful, the embryo of the best lamps now in commercial use, and but for which the subdivision of the electric light by incandescence would still be nothing but the ignis fatuus which it was proclaimed to be in 1879 by some of the reamed experts who are now witnesses to belittle his achievement and show that it did not rise to the dignity of an invention.... It is impossible to resist the conclusion that the invention of the slender thread of carbon as a substitute for the burners previously employed opened the path to the practical subdivision of the electric light."
In a lawsuit against the United States Electric Lighting Company, United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, July 14, 1891, Judge Wallace stated in his opinion: "The hopelessness of trying to maintain a burner in a vacuum consistently had discouraged earlier inventors, and Mr. Edison deserves credit for overcoming the mechanical challenges that discouraged them.... He was the first to create a carbon from materials, using a process specifically designed to give it high specific resistance; the first to create a carbon in the unique shape intended to provide it high total resistance; and the first to combine such a burner with the essential components of lamp construction to prevent its breakdown and ensure it had a sufficiently long lifespan. By achieving these things, he produced a lamp that was practically functional and successful, the precursor of the best lamps currently in commercial use, and without which the development of electric light through incandescence would still be nothing more than the elusive phenomenon it was considered in 1879 by some of the so-called experts who now testify to undermine his achievement and suggest that it didn’t qualify as an invention.... It is impossible to ignore the conclusion that the invention of the thin thread of carbon as a substitute for the burners used before opened the way to the practical development of electric light."
An appeal was taken in the above suit to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, and on October 4, 1892, the decree of the lower court was affirmed. The judges (Lacombe and Shipman), in a long opinion reviewed the facts and the art, and said, inter alia: "Edison's invention was practically made when he ascertained the theretofore unknown fact that carbon would stand high temperature, even when very attenuated, if operated in a high vacuum, without the phenomenon of disintegration. This fact he utilized by the means which he has described, a lamp having a filamentary carbon burner in a nearly perfect vacuum."
An appeal was made in the above case to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, and on October 4, 1892, the lower court's decision was upheld. The judges (Lacombe and Shipman), in a lengthy opinion, reviewed the facts and the art, and stated, among other things: "Edison's invention was effectively completed when he discovered the previously unknown fact that carbon could withstand high temperatures, even when very thin, if it was used in a high vacuum without breaking down. He applied this fact with the methods he described, using a lamp that had a carbon filament in a nearly perfect vacuum."
In a suit against the Boston Incandescent Lamp Company et al., in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, decided in favor of Edison on June 11, 1894, Judge Colt, in his opinion, said, among other things: "Edison made an important invention; he produced the first practical incandescent electric lamp; the patent is a pioneer in the sense of the patent law; it may be said that his invention created the art of incandescent electric lighting."
In a lawsuit against the Boston Incandescent Lamp Company and others, in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, decided in favor of Edison on June 11, 1894, Judge Colt stated in his opinion, among other things: "Edison made a significant invention; he created the first practical incandescent electric lamp; the patent is a pioneer in the context of patent law; it can be said that his invention established the field of incandescent electric lighting."
Opinions of other courts, similar in tenor to the foregoing, might be cited, but it would be merely in the nature of reiteration. The above are sufficient to illustrate the direct clearness of judicial decision on Edison's position as the founder of the art of electric lighting by incandescence.
Opinions from other courts that are similar to the ones mentioned above could be referenced, but that would just be repeating what's already been said. The ones above are enough to clearly show the strong judicial decision regarding Edison’s role as the pioneer of electric lighting through incandescence.
X. EDISON'S DYNAMO WORK
AT the present writing, when, after the phenomenally rapid electrical development of thirty years, we find on the market a great variety of modern forms of efficient current generators advertised under the names of different inventors (none, however, bearing the name of Edison), a young electrical engineer of the present generation might well inquire whether the great inventor had ever contributed anything to the art beyond a mere TYPE of machine formerly made and bearing his name, but not now marketed except second hand.
At the time of writing this, after the incredibly fast electrical advancements of the past thirty years, we see a wide range of modern and efficient current generators available, all branded with the names of various inventors (none of which are Edison). A young electrical engineer today might wonder if the great inventor ever really added anything to the field besides a specific type of machine that used to be made with his name on it, but is now only found second-hand.
For adequate information he might search in vain the books usually regarded as authorities on the subject of dynamo-electric machinery, for with slight exceptions there has been a singular unanimity in the omission of writers to give Edison credit for his great and basic contributions to heavy-current technics, although they have been universally acknowledged by scientific and practical men to have laid the foundation for the efficiency of, and to be embodied in all modern generators of current.
For the information he needed, he might search in vain the books typically seen as authoritative on dynamo-electric machinery. With few exceptions, most authors have consistently overlooked giving Edison credit for his significant and fundamental contributions to heavy-current technology, even though these contributions are widely recognized by both scientists and practitioners as the foundation for the efficiency found in all modern current generators.
It might naturally be expected that the essential facts of Edison's work would appear on the face of his numerous patents on dynamo-electric machinery, but such is not necessarily the case, unless they are carefully studied in the light of the state of the art as it existed at the time. While some of these patents (especially the earlier ones) cover specific devices embodying fundamental principles that not only survive to the present day, but actually lie at the foundation of the art as it now exists, there is no revelation therein of Edison's preceding studies of magnets, which extended over many years, nor of his later systematic investigations and deductions.
It might be naturally expected that the key details of Edison's work would be evident in his many patents on dynamo-electric machinery, but that's not always the case unless they are closely examined in the context of the technology at the time. While some of these patents (especially the earlier ones) cover specific devices that incorporate fundamental principles still relevant today and form the basis of the industry as it exists now, they do not reveal Edison's earlier studies on magnets, which took many years, nor his later systematic research and conclusions.
Dynamo-electric machines of a primitive kind had been invented and were in use to a very limited extent for arc lighting and electroplating for some years prior to the summer of 1819, when Edison, with an embryonic lighting SYSTEM in mind, cast about for a type of machine technically and commercially suitable for the successful carrying out of his plans. He found absolutely none. On the contrary, all of the few types then obtainable were uneconomical, indeed wasteful, in regard to efficiency. The art, if indeed there can be said to have been an art at that time, was in chaotic confusion, and only because of Edison's many years' study of the magnet was he enabled to conclude that insufficiency in quantity of iron in the magnets of such machines, together with poor surface contacts, rendered the cost of magnetization abnormally high. The heating of solid armatures, the only kind then known, and poor insulation in the commutators, also gave rise to serious losses. But perhaps the most serious drawback lay in the high-resistance armature, based upon the highest scientific dictum of the time that in order to obtain the maximum amount of work from a machine, the internal resistance of the armature must equal the resistance of the exterior circuit, although the application of this principle entailed the useless expenditure of at least 50 per cent. of the applied energy.
Dynamo-electric machines in their early form had been invented and were used to a very limited extent for arc lighting and electroplating for several years before the summer of 1819. During this time, Edison, with a basic lighting SYSTEM in mind, searched for a type of machine that was technically and commercially suitable for successfully implementing his plans. He found none. In fact, all of the few types available were inefficient and wasteful. The field, if it could even be called a field then, was in total disarray, and it was only due to Edison's years of studying magnets that he realized the lack of iron in the magnets of these machines, along with poor surface contacts, made magnetization unusually expensive. Heating in solid armatures, the only kind known back then, and inadequate insulation in the commutators also caused significant losses. However, perhaps the biggest issue was the high-resistance armature, based on the best scientific understanding of the time, which said that to get the most work from a machine, the internal resistance of the armature needed to match the resistance of the external circuit. Unfortunately, applying this principle wasted at least 50 percent of the energy used.
It seems almost incredible that only a little over thirty years ago the sum of scientific knowledge in regard to dynamo-electric machines was so meagre that the experts of the period should settle upon such a dictum as this, but such was the fact, as will presently appear. Mechanical generators of electricity were comparatively new at that time; their theory and practice were very imperfectly understood; indeed, it is quite within the bounds of truth to say that the correct principles were befogged by reason of the lack of practical knowledge of their actual use. Electricians and scientists of the period had been accustomed for many years past to look to the chemical battery as the source from which to obtain electrical energy; and in the practical application of such energy to telegraphy and kindred uses, much thought and ingenuity had been expended in studying combinations of connecting such cells so as to get the best results. In the text-books of the period it was stated as a settled principle that, in order to obtain the maximum work out of a set of batteries, the internal resistance must approximately equal the resistance of the exterior circuit. This principle and its application in practice were quite correct as regards chemical batteries, but not as regards dynamo machines. Both were generators of electrical current, but so different in construction and operation, that rules applicable to the practical use of the one did not apply with proper commercial efficiency to the other. At the period under consideration, which may be said to have been just before dawn of the day of electric light, the philosophy of the dynamo was seen only in mysterious, hazy outlines—just emerging from the darkness of departing night. Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that the dynamo was loosely regarded by electricians as the practical equivalent of a chemical battery; that many of the characteristics of performance of the chemical cell were also attributed to it, and that if the maximum work could be gotten out of a set of batteries when the internal and external resistances were equal (and this was commercially the best thing to do), so must it be also with a dynamo.
It's almost hard to believe that just over thirty years ago, the state of scientific knowledge about dynamo-electric machines was so limited that the experts of the time reached such a conclusion. Mechanical generators of electricity were relatively new back then; their theory and practical use were poorly understood. It's fair to say that the correct principles were clouded by a lack of hands-on knowledge of how they actually worked. Electricians and scientists had been used to relying on chemical batteries as the source of electrical energy for many years, and significant thought and creativity were dedicated to figuring out how to connect those cells for the best results in telegraphy and similar applications. Textbooks of the time stated that to get the maximum work from a set of batteries, the internal resistance had to roughly match the resistance of the external circuit. This principle worked well for chemical batteries but not for dynamo machines. Both generated electrical current, but their designs and operations were so different that the rules that worked for one didn't apply efficiently to the other. At the time in question, which can be described as just before the dawn of electric light, the understanding of the dynamo was still vague and unclear—just beginning to emerge from the darkness. So, it’s not surprising that electricians loosely viewed the dynamo as a practical equivalent to a chemical battery; they attributed many of the performance characteristics of the chemical cell to the dynamo, believing that if maximum work could be achieved with batteries by matching internal and external resistances (which was considered the best practice), the same should apply to a dynamo.
It was by no miracle that Edison was far and away ahead of his time when he undertook to improve the dynamo. He was possessed of absolute KNOWLEDGE far beyond that of his contemporaries. This he ad acquired by the hardest kind of work and incessant experiment with magnets of all kinds during several years preceding, particularly in connection with his study of automatic telegraphy. His knowledge of magnets was tremendous. He had studied and experimented with electromagnets in enormous variety, and knew their peculiarities in charge and discharge, lag, self-induction, static effects, condenser effects, and the various other phenomena connected therewith. He had also made collateral studies of iron, steel, and copper, insulation, winding, etc. Hence, by reason of this extensive work and knowledge, Edison was naturally in a position to realize the utter commercial impossibility of the then best dynamo machine in existence, which had an efficiency of only about 40 per cent., and was constructed on the "cut-and-try" principle.
It was no miracle that Edison was far ahead of his time when he set out to improve the dynamo. He had an exceptional level of KNOWLEDGE that surpassed that of his peers. He had gained this through rigorous work and continuous experimentation with various types of magnets over several years, especially while studying automatic telegraphy. His understanding of magnets was extensive. He had explored and tested electromagnets in a wide range of forms and was familiar with their behaviors regarding charge and discharge, lag, self-induction, static effects, condenser effects, and other related phenomena. He had also conducted studies on iron, steel, copper, insulation, winding, and more. Therefore, due to this thorough research and knowledge, Edison was in a unique position to recognize the complete commercial inadequacy of the best dynamo machine available at the time, which had an efficiency of only about 40 percent and was built on a "cut-and-try" basis.
He was also naturally in a position to assume the task he set out to accomplish, of undertaking to plan and-build an improved type of machine that should be commercial in having an efficiency of at least 90 per cent. Truly a prodigious undertaking in those dark days, when from the standpoint of Edison's large experience the most practical and correct electrical treatise was contained in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and in a German publication which Mr. Upton had brought with him after he had finished his studies with the illustrious Helmholtz. It was at this period that Mr. Upton commenced his association with Edison, bringing to the great work the very latest scientific views and the assistance of the higher mathematics, to which he had devoted his attention for several years previously.
He was also naturally in a position to take on the task he set out to achieve: planning and building an improved type of machine that would be commercially viable with an efficiency of at least 90 percent. It was truly a monumental challenge during those tough times when, based on Edison's extensive experience, the most practical and accurate electrical information was found in the Encyclopaedia Britannica and a German publication that Mr. Upton had brought with him after completing his studies with the renowned Helmholtz. It was during this time that Mr. Upton began his collaboration with Edison, bringing the latest scientific insights and the application of advanced mathematics, which he had focused on for several years prior.
As some account of Edison's investigations in this connection has already been given in Chapter XII of the narrative, we shall not enlarge upon them here, but quote from An Historical Review, by Charles L. Clarke, Laboratory Assistant at Menlo Park, 1880-81; Chief Engineer of the Edison Electric Light Company, 1881-84:
As some information about Edison's research in this area has already been provided in Chapter XII of the narrative, we won't go into detail here but will quote from An Historical Review, by Charles L. Clarke, Laboratory Assistant at Menlo Park, 1880-81; Chief Engineer of the Edison Electric Light Company, 1881-84:
"In June, 1879, was published the account of the Edison dynamo-electric machine that survived in the art. This machine went into extensive commercial use, and was notable for its very massive and powerful field-magnets and armature of extremely low resistance as compared with the combined external resistance of the supply-mains and lamps. By means of the large masses of iron in the field-magnets, and closely fitted joints between the several parts thereof, the magnetic resistance (reluctance) of the iron parts of the magnetic circuit was reduced to a minimum, and the required magnetization effected with the maximum economy. At the same time Mr. Edison announced the commercial necessity of having the armature of the dynamo of low resistance, as compared with the external resistance, in order that a large percentage of the electrical energy developed should be utilized in the lamps, and only a small percentage lost in the armature, albeit this procedure reduced the total generating capacity of the machine. He also proposed to make the resistance of the supply-mains small, as compared with the combined resistance of the lamps in multiple arc, in order to still further increase the percentage of energy utilized in the lamps. And likewise to this end the combined resistance of the generator armatures in multiple arc was kept relatively small by adjusting the number of generators operating in multiple at any time to the number of lamps then in use. The field-magnet circuits of the dynamos were connected in multiple with a separate energizing source; and the field-current; and strength of field, were regulated to maintain the required amount of electromotive force upon the supply-mains under all conditions of load from the maximum to the minimum number of lamps in use, and to keep the electromotive force of all machines alike."
In June 1879, the account of the Edison dynamo-electric machine was published, marking a significant advancement in the field. This machine saw widespread commercial use and was known for its large and powerful field magnets, along with an armature that had extremely low resistance compared to the total external resistance from the supply mains and lamps. By utilizing the substantial iron mass in the field magnets and ensuring tight joints between the parts, the magnetic resistance (reluctance) of the iron components in the magnetic circuit was minimized, allowing for efficient magnetization. At the same time, Mr. Edison emphasized the commercial need for the armature of the dynamo to have low resistance relative to the external resistance so that a high percentage of the electrical energy produced could be used in the lamps, with only a small percentage being lost in the armature, even though this approach reduced the overall generating capacity of the machine. He also suggested keeping the resistance of the supply mains low compared to the combined resistance of the lamps in a multiple arc setup, further maximizing the energy used in the lamps. Additionally, to achieve this, the total resistance of the generator armatures in multiple arcs was kept relatively low by adjusting the number of generators operating in parallel to match the number of lamps in use. The field-magnet circuits of the dynamos were connected in parallel with a separate energizing source, and the field current and strength of the field were regulated to ensure the necessary amount of electromotive force on the supply mains under varying load conditions, from the maximum to the minimum number of lamps, while keeping the electromotive force consistent across all machines.
Among the earliest of Edison's dynamo experiments were those relating to the core of the armature. He realized at once that the heat generated in a solid core was a prolific source of loss. He experimented with bundles of iron wires variously insulated, also with sheet-iron rolled cylindrically and covered with iron wire wound concentrically. These experiments and many others were tried in a great variety of ways, until, as the result of all this work, Edison arrived at the principle which has remained in the art to this day. He split up the iron core of the armature into thin laminations, separated by paper, thus practically suppressing Foucault currents therein and resulting heating effect. It was in his machine also that mica was used for the first time as an insulating medium in a commutator. [27]
Among Edison's earliest experiments with dynamos were those focused on the armature core. He quickly realized that the heat generated in a solid core led to significant energy loss. He tested various bundles of insulated iron wires, as well as sheet iron rolled into a cylinder and wrapped with concentric iron wire. These experiments, along with many others, were conducted in numerous ways, and eventually, through this extensive work, Edison developed a principle that is still relevant in the field today. He divided the iron core of the armature into thin layers, separated by paper, effectively minimizing eddy currents and the resulting heat. It was also in his machine that mica was used for the first time as an insulating material in a commutator. [27]
[Footnote 27: The commercial manufacture of built-up sheets of mica for electrical purposes was first established at the Edison Machine Works, Goerck Street, New York, in 1881.]
[Footnote 27: The commercial production of layered mica sheets for electrical use first began at the Edison Machine Works, Goerck Street, New York, in 1881.]
Elementary as these principles will appear to the modern student or engineer, they were denounced as nothing short of absurdity at the time of their promulgation—especially so with regard to Edison's proposal to upset the then settled dictum that the armature resistance should be equal to the external resistance. His proposition was derided in the technical press of the period, both at home and abroad. As public opinion can be best illustrated by actual quotation, we shall present a characteristic instance.
Elementary as these principles may seem to today’s students or engineers, they were considered completely absurd when they were first introduced—especially Edison's suggestion to challenge the established belief that the armature resistance should be equal to the external resistance. His proposal was mocked in the technical press of the time, both nationally and internationally. To show how public opinion was shaped, we will provide a representative example.
In the Scientific American of October 18, 1879, there appeared an illustrated article by Mr. Upton on Edison's dynamo machine, in which Edison's views and claims were set forth. A subsequent issue contained a somewhat acrimonious letter of criticism by a well-known maker of dynamo machines. At the risk of being lengthy, we must quote nearly all this letter: "I can scarcely conceive it as possible that the article on the above subject '(Edison's Electric Generator)' in last week's Scientific American could have been written from statements derived from Mr. Edison himself, inasmuch as so many of the advantages claimed for the machine described and statements of the results obtained are so manifestly absurd as to indicate on the part of both writer and prompter a positive want of knowledge of the electric circuit and the principles governing the construction and operation of electric machines.
In the Scientific American on October 18, 1879, there was an illustrated article by Mr. Upton about Edison's dynamo machine, where Edison's opinions and claims were presented. A later issue included a rather harsh criticism letter from a well-known dynamo machine manufacturer. Though it might be a bit long, we should quote almost all of this letter: "I can hardly believe that the article on '(Edison's Electric Generator)' in last week's Scientific American could have been written based on statements from Mr. Edison himself, as so many of the advantages claimed for the described machine and the results stated are so clearly ridiculous, indicating that both the writer and the source show a significant lack of understanding of the electric circuit and the principles involved in the design and operation of electric machines."
"It is not my intention to criticise the design or construction of the machine (not because they are not open to criticism), as I am now and have been for many years engaged in the manufacture of electric machines, but rather to call attention to the impossibility of obtaining the described results without destroying the doctrine of the conservation and correlation of forces.
"It’s not my goal to criticize the design or construction of the machine (not that they aren’t open to criticism), as I’ve been involved in making electric machines for many years. Instead, I want to highlight the impossibility of achieving the described results without undermining the principle of conservation and correlation of forces."
. . . . .
. . . . .
"It is stated that 'the internal resistance of the armature' of this machine 'is only 1/2 ohm.' On this fact and the disproportion between this resistance and that of the external circuit, the theory of the alleged efficiency of the machine is stated to be based, for we are informed that, 'while this generator in general principle is the same as in the best well-known forms, still there is an all-important difference, which is that it will convert and deliver for useful work nearly double the number of foot-pounds that any other machine will under like conditions.'" The writer of this critical letter then proceeds to quote Mr. Upton's statement of this efficiency: "'Now the energy converted is distributed over the whole resistance, hence if the resistance of the machine be represented by 1 and the exterior circuit by 9, then of the total energy converted nine-tenths will be useful, as it is outside of the machine, and one-tenth is lost in the resistance of the machine.'"
"It’s mentioned that 'the internal resistance of the armature' of this machine 'is only 1/2 ohm.' This fact, along with the significant difference between this resistance and that of the external circuit, is said to be the basis for the theory of the machine’s claimed efficiency. We are told that, 'while this generator generally follows the same principles as the best-known designs, there is one crucial difference: it can convert and provide nearly double the amount of foot-pounds for useful work compared to any other machine under similar conditions.' The writer of this critical letter then quotes Mr. Upton’s assessment of this efficiency: 'Now the energy converted is distributed across the whole resistance, so if we represent the resistance of the machine as 1 and the external circuit as 9, then out of the total energy converted, nine-tenths will be useful since it is outside of the machine, and one-tenth is lost to the machine’s resistance.'"
After this the critic goes on to say:
After this, the reviewer continues:
"How any one acquainted with the laws of the electric circuit can make such statements is what I cannot understand. The statement last quoted is mathematically absurd. It implies either that the machine is CAPABLE OF INCREASING ITS OWN ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE NINE TIMES WITHOUT AN INCREASED EXPENDITURE OF POWER, or that external resistance is NOT resistance to the current induced in the Edison machine.
"How anyone familiar with the laws of electric circuits can make such statements is beyond my understanding. The statement just quoted is mathematically ridiculous. It either implies that the machine can INCREASE ITS OWN ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE NINE TIMES WITHOUT USING MORE POWER, or that external resistance does NOT affect the current generated in the Edison machine."
"Does Mr. Edison, or any one for him, mean to say that r/n enables him to obtain nE, and that C IS NOT = E / (r/n + R)? If so Mr. Edison has discovered something MORE than perpetual motion, and Mr. Keely had better retire from the field.
"Is Mr. Edison, or anyone on his behalf, really claiming that r/n allows him to get nE, and that C is not equal to E / (r/n + R)? If that's the case, then Mr. Edison has found something even beyond perpetual motion, and Mr. Keely should probably step back."
"Further on the writer (Mr. Upton) gives us another example of this mode of reasoning when, emboldened and satisfied with the absurd theory above exposed, he endeavors to prove the cause of the inefficiency of the Siemens and other machines. Couldn't the writer of the article see that since C = E/(r + R) that by R/n or by making R = r, the machine would, according to his theory, have returned more useful current to the circuit than could be due to the power employed (and in the ratio indicated), so that there would actually be a creation of force! . . . .
"Later, the writer (Mr. Upton) provides another example of this way of thinking when, feeling bold and pleased with the ridiculous theory mentioned earlier, he tries to explain why Siemens and other machines are inefficient. Couldn't the writer of the article understand that since C = E/(r + R), by using R/n or by setting R = r, the machine, according to his theory, would have delivered more useful current to the circuit than what could be produced by the power used (and in the ratio he suggested), meaning there would actually be a creation of force! . . . ."
"In conclusion allow me to say that if Mr Edison thinks he has accomplished so much by the REDUCTION OF THE INTERNAL RESISTANCE of his machine, that he has much more to do in this direction before his machine will equal IN THIS RESPECT others already in the market."
"In conclusion, I’d like to say that if Mr. Edison believes he has achieved a lot by lowering the internal resistance of his machine, he still has a lot more to do in that area before his machine can match others already available on the market in this regard."
Another participant in the controversy on Edison's generator was a scientific gentleman, who in a long article published in the Scientific American, in November, 1879, gravely undertook to instruct Edison in the A B C of electrical principles, and then proceeded to demonstrate mathematically the IMPOSSIBILITY of doing WHAT EDISON HAD ACTUALLY DONE. This critic concludes with a gentle rebuke to the inventor for ill-timed jesting, and a suggestion to furnish AUTHENTIC information!
Another participant in the debate over Edison's generator was a scientist who, in a lengthy article published in Scientific American in November 1879, seriously attempted to educate Edison on the basics of electrical principles, and then went on to mathematically prove the IMPOSSIBILITY of what EDISON HAD ACTUALLY DONE. This critic ended with a mild reprimand to the inventor for his poorly timed jokes and a recommendation to provide AUTHENTIC information!
In the light of facts, as they were and are, this article is so full of humor that we shall indulge in a few quotations It commences in A B C fashion as follows: "Electric machines convert mechanical into electrical energy.... The ratio of yield to consumption is the expression of the efficiency of the machine.... How many foot-pounds of electricity can be got out of 100 foot-pounds of mechanical energy? Certainly not more than 100: certainly less.... The facts and laws of physics, with the assistance of mathematical logic, never fail to furnish precious answers to such questions."
In light of the facts, as they have been and are, this article is so full of humor that we’re going to share a few quotes. It starts out in a straightforward way like this: "Electric machines convert mechanical energy into electrical energy.... The ratio of output to input indicates the efficiency of the machine.... How many foot-pounds of electricity can you get from 100 foot-pounds of mechanical energy? Certainly not more than 100; definitely less.... The facts and laws of physics, along with mathematical logic, always provide valuable answers to such questions."
The would-be critic then goes on to tabulate tests of certain other dynamo machines by a committee of the Franklin Institute in 1879, the results of which showed that these machines returned about 50 per cent. of the applied mechanical energy, ingenuously remarking: "Why is it that when we have produced the electricity, half of it must slip away? Some persons will be content if they are told simply that it is a way which electricity has of behaving. But there is a satisfactory rational explanation which I believe can be made plain to persons of ordinary intelligence. It ought to be known to all those who are making or using machines. I am grieved to observe that many persons who talk and write glibly about electricity do not understand it; some even ignore or deny the fact to be explained."
The would-be critic then goes on to summarize tests of certain other dynamo machines conducted by a committee of the Franklin Institute in 1879, which showed that these machines returned about 50 percent of the applied mechanical energy. He wisely points out, "Why is it that when we generate electricity, half of it must be lost? Some people will be satisfied if they are told that it’s just how electricity behaves. But there’s a clear and reasonable explanation that I believe can be made understandable to ordinary people. It should be known to everyone who is making or using machines. I’m disappointed to see that many people who speak and write confidently about electricity don’t actually understand it; some even ignore or deny the need for an explanation."
Here follows HIS explanation, after which he goes on to say: "At this point plausibly comes in a suggestion that the internal part of the circuit be made very small and the external part very large. Why not (say) make the internal part 1 and the external 9, thus saving nine-tenths and losing only one-tenth? Unfortunately, the suggestion is not practical; a fallacy is concealed in it."
Here’s his explanation, after which he continues: "It seems reasonable to suggest that the inside part of the circuit should be very small and the outside part very large. Why not make the inside part 1 and the outside part 9, saving 90% and only losing 10%? Unfortunately, this suggestion isn’t practical; there’s a flaw hidden in it."
He then goes on to prove his case mathematically, to his own satisfaction, following it sadly by condoling with and a warning to Edison: "But about Edison's electric generator! . . . No one capable of making the improvements in the telegraph and telephone, for which we are indebted to Mr. Edison, could be other than an accomplished electrician. His reputation as a scientist, indeed, is smirched by the newspaper exaggerations, and no doubt he will be more careful in future. But there is a danger nearer home, indeed, among his own friends and in his very household.
He then goes on to prove his case mathematically, to his own satisfaction, sadly following it up by expressing condolence and a warning to Edison: "But about Edison's electric generator! . . . No one capable of making the improvements in the telegraph and telephone that we owe to Mr. Edison could be anything less than a skilled electrician. His reputation as a scientist is certainly tarnished by the media exaggerations, and I'm sure he'll be more cautious in the future. But there's a danger that's much closer to home, within his own circle of friends and even in his own household."
". . . The writer of page 242" (the original article) "is probably a friend of Mr. Edison, but possibly, alas! a wicked partner. Why does he say such things as these? 'Mr. Edison claims that he realizes 90 per cent. of the power applied to this machine in external work.' . . . Perhaps the writer is a humorist, and had in his mind Colonel Sellers, etc., which he could not keep out of a serious discussion; but such jests are not good.
". . . The writer of page 242" (the original article) "is likely a friend of Mr. Edison, but possibly, unfortunately! a deceitful associate. Why does he make statements like these? 'Mr. Edison claims that he achieves 90 percent of the power used in this machine for external work.' . . . Maybe the writer is trying to be funny and is thinking of Colonel Sellers, etc., which he couldn't separate from a serious conversation; but such jokes are not appropriate."
"Mr. Edison has built a very interesting machine, and he has the opportunity of making a valuable contribution to the electrical arts by furnishing authentic accounts of its capabilities."
"Mr. Edison has created a really fascinating machine, and he has the chance to make a significant contribution to the field of electricity by providing accurate details about what it can do."
The foregoing extracts are unavoidably lengthy, but, viewed in the light of facts, serve to illustrate most clearly that Edison's conceptions and work were far and away ahead of the comprehension of his contemporaries in the art, and that his achievements in the line of efficient dynamo design and construction were indeed truly fundamental and revolutionary in character. Much more of similar nature to the above could be quoted from other articles published elsewhere, but the foregoing will serve as instances generally representing all. In the controversy which appeared in the columns of the Scientific American, Mr. Upton, Edison's mathematician, took up the question on his side, and answered the critics by further elucidations of the principles on which Edison had founded such remarkable and radical improvements in the art. The type of Edison's first dynamo-electric machine, the description of which gave rise to the above controversy, is shown in Fig. 1.
The previous excerpts are necessarily long, but when considering the facts, they clearly show that Edison's ideas and work were way ahead of what his contemporaries in the field could understand. His achievements in designing and building efficient dynamos were truly groundbreaking and fundamental. There could be many more examples like the ones above from other articles published elsewhere, but these serve as general representatives. In the debate that appeared in the Scientific American, Mr. Upton, Edison's mathematician, defended their position and responded to the critics by explaining further the principles on which Edison based his remarkable and innovative improvements in the field. The type of Edison's first dynamo-electric machine, which sparked the controversy mentioned above, is shown in Fig. 1.
Any account of Edison's work on the dynamo would be incomplete did it omit to relate his conception and construction of the great direct-connected steam-driven generator that was the prototype of the colossal units which are used throughout the world to-day.
Any account of Edison's work on the dynamo would be incomplete if it didn't mention his idea and building of the large direct-connected steam-driven generator that became the model for the massive units used around the world today.
In the demonstrating plant installed and operated by him at Menlo Park in 1880 ten dynamos of eight horse-power each were driven by a slow-speed engine through a complicated system of counter-shafting, and, to quote from Mr. Clarke's Historical Review, "it was found that a considerable percentage of the power of the engine was necessarily wasted in friction by this method of driving, and to prevent this waste and thus increase the economy of his system, Mr. Edison conceived the idea of substituting a single large dynamo for the several small dynamos, and directly coupling it with the driving engine, and at the same time preserve the requisite high armature speed by using an engine of the high-speed type. He also expected to realize still further gains in economy from the use of a large dynamo in place of several small machines by a more than correspondingly lower armature resistance, less energy for magnetizing the field, and for other minor reasons. To the same end, he intended to supply steam to the engine under a much higher boiler pressure than was customary in stationary-engine driving at that time."
In the demonstration plant he set up and ran at Menlo Park in 1880, ten dynamos, each with eight horsepower, were powered by a slow-speed engine through a complex system of counter-shafting. As noted in Mr. Clarke's Historical Review, "it was found that a significant percentage of the engine's power was wasted due to friction with this method of drive. To reduce this waste and improve the efficiency of his system, Mr. Edison came up with the idea of replacing multiple small dynamos with a single large dynamo connected directly to the driving engine. At the same time, he aimed to maintain the necessary high armature speed by using a high-speed engine. He also anticipated that using a large dynamo instead of several smaller machines would lead to even greater efficiency due to a significantly lower armature resistance, reduced energy needed for field magnetization, and other minor factors. To achieve this, he planned to supply steam to the engine at a much higher boiler pressure than what was typical for stationary-engine use at that time."
The construction of the first one of these large machines was commenced late in the year 1880. Early in 1881 it was completed and tested, but some radical defects in armature construction were developed, and it was also demonstrated that a rate of engine speed too high for continuously safe and economical operation had been chosen. The machine was laid aside. An accurate illustration of this machine, as it stood in the engine-room at Menlo Park, is given in Van Nostrand's Engineering Magazine, Vol. XXV, opposite page 439, and a brief description is given on page 450.
The construction of the first of these large machines started late in 1880. It was completed and tested early in 1881, but some major flaws in the armature design were found, and it became clear that the chosen engine speed was too high for safe and economical operation over time. The machine was put aside. An accurate illustration of this machine, as it was in the engine room at Menlo Park, is provided in Van Nostrand's Engineering Magazine, Vol. XXV, opposite page 439, with a brief description on page 450.
With the experience thus gained, Edison began, in the spring of 1881, at the Edison Machine Works, Goerck Street, New York City, the construction of the first successful machine of this type. This was the great machine known as "Jumbo No. 1," which is referred to in the narrative as having been exhibited at the Paris International Electrical Exposition, where it was regarded as the wonder of the electrical world. An intimation of some of the tremendous difficulties encountered in the construction of this machine has already been given in preceding pages, hence we shall not now enlarge on the subject, except to note in passing that the terribly destructive effects of the spark of self-induction and the arcing following it were first manifested in this powerful machine, but were finally overcome by Edison after a strenuous application of his powers to the solution of the problem.
With the experience he gained, Edison started building the first successful machine of this type in the spring of 1881 at the Edison Machine Works on Goerck Street in New York City. This machine was known as "Jumbo No. 1," which is mentioned in the story as having been shown at the Paris International Electrical Exposition, where it was seen as a marvel of the electrical world. Some of the huge challenges faced during the construction of this machine have already been mentioned in previous pages, so we won’t go into more detail here, except to briefly note that the devastating effects of the self-induction spark and the resulting arcing were first seen in this powerful machine, but Edison ultimately solved this problem after a lot of hard work and determination.
It may be of interest, however, to mention some of its dimensions and electrical characteristics, quoting again from Mr. Clarke: "The field-magnet had eight solid cylindrical cores, 8 inches in diameter and 57 inches long, upon each of which was wound an exciting-coil of 3.2 ohms resistance, consisting of 2184 turns of No. 10 B. W. G. insulated copper wire, disposed in six layers. The laminated iron core of the armature, formed of thin iron disks, was 33 3/4 inches long, and had an internal diameter of 12 1/2 inches, and an external diameter of 26 7/16 inches. It was mounted on a 6-inch shaft. The field-poles were 33 3/4 inches long, and 27 1/2 inches inside diameter The armature winding consisted of 146 copper bars on the face of the core, connected into a closed-coil winding by means of 73 copper disks at each end of the core. The cross-sectional area of each bar was 0.2 square inch their average length was 42.7 inches, and the copper end-disks were 0.065 inch thick. The commutator had 73 sections. The armature resistance was 0.0092 ohm, [28] of which 0.0055 ohm was in the armature bars and 0.0037 ohm in the end-disks." An illustration of the next latest type of this machine is presented in Fig. 2.
It might be interesting to note some of its dimensions and electrical characteristics, quoting Mr. Clarke again: "The field magnet had eight solid cylindrical cores, 8 inches in diameter and 57 inches long, each wound with an exciting coil of 3.2 ohms resistance, made up of 2,184 turns of No. 10 B. W. G. insulated copper wire, arranged in six layers. The laminated iron core of the armature, made from thin iron disks, was 33 3/4 inches long, with an internal diameter of 12 1/2 inches and an external diameter of 26 7/16 inches. It was mounted on a 6-inch shaft. The field poles measured 33 3/4 inches long and had an inside diameter of 27 1/2 inches. The armature winding consisted of 146 copper bars on the face of the core, connected into a closed-coil winding with 73 copper disks at each end of the core. Each bar had a cross-sectional area of 0.2 square inches, an average length of 42.7 inches, and the copper end disks were 0.065 inches thick. The commutator had 73 sections. The armature resistance was 0.0092 ohm, with 0.0055 ohm in the armature bars and 0.0037 ohm in the end disks." An illustration of the next latest type of this machine is presented in Fig. 2.
[Footnote 28: Had Edison in Upton's Scientific American article in 1879 proposed such an exceedingly low armature resistance for this immense generator (although its ratio was proportionate to the original machine), his critics might probably have been sufficiently indignant as to be unable to express themselves coherently.]
[Footnote 28: If Edison had suggested such an incredibly low armature resistance for this huge generator in Upton's Scientific American article in 1879 (even though its ratio was in line with the original machine), his critics might have been so upset that they wouldn't have been able to articulate their thoughts clearly.]
The student may find it interesting to look up Edison's United States Patents Nos. 242,898, 263,133, 263,146, and 246,647, bearing upon the construction of the "Jumbo"; also illustrated articles in the technical journals of the time, among which may be mentioned: Scientific American, Vol. XLV, page 367; Engineering, London, Vol. XXXII, pages 409 and 419, The Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review, London, Vol. IX, pages 431-433, 436-446; La Nature, Paris, 9th year, Part II, pages 408-409; Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Elektricitaatslehre, Munich and Leipsic, Vol. IV, pages 4-14; and Dredge's Electric Illumination, 1882, Vol. I, page 261.
The student might find it interesting to look up Edison's United States Patents Nos. 242,898, 263,133, 263,146, and 246,647, related to the construction of the "Jumbo"; also, check out articles in the technical journals of that time, including: Scientific American, Vol. XLV, page 367; Engineering, London, Vol. XXXII, pages 409 and 419, The Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review, London, Vol. IX, pages 431-433, 436-446; La Nature, Paris, 9th year, Part II, pages 408-409; Zeitschrift für Angewandte Elektricitätslehre, Munich and Leipzig, Vol. IV, pages 4-14; and Dredge's Electric Illumination, 1882, Vol. I, page 261.
The further development of these great machines later on, and their extensive practical use, are well known and need no further comment, except in passing it may be noted that subsequent machines had each a capacity of 1200 lamps of 16 candle-power, and that the armature resistance was still further reduced to 0.0039 ohm.
The ongoing development of these powerful machines and their widespread practical application is well known and doesn’t require further discussion. It’s worth mentioning that later machines had a capacity of 1,200 lamps at 16 candle-power, and the armature resistance was further lowered to 0.0039 ohm.
Edison's clear insight into the future, as illustrated by his persistent advocacy of large direct-connected generating units, is abundantly vindicated by present-day practice. His Jumbo machines, of 175 horse-power, so enormous for their time, have served as prototypes, and have been succeeded by generators which have constantly grown in size and capacity until at this time (1910) it is not uncommon to employ such generating units of a capacity of 14,000 kilowatts, or about 18,666 horse-power.
Edison's clear vision for the future, shown by his strong support for large direct-connected generating units, is fully supported by how things are done today. His Jumbo machines, which had 175 horsepower and were huge for their time, became models, and they've been followed by generators that have consistently increased in size and capacity. As of now (1910), it's common to use generating units with a capacity of 14,000 kilowatts, or about 18,666 horsepower.
We have not entered into specific descriptions of the many other forms of dynamo machines invented by Edison, such as the multipolar, the disk dynamo, and the armature with two windings, for sub-station distribution; indeed, it is not possible within our limited space to present even a brief digest of Edison's great and comprehensive work on the dynamo-electric machine, as embodied in his extensive experiments and in over one hundred patents granted to him. We have, therefore, confined ourselves to the indication of a few salient and basic features, leaving it to the interested student to examine the patents and the technical literature of the long period of time over which Edison's labors were extended.
We haven't gone into specific details about the various types of dynamo machines created by Edison, like the multipolar dynamo, the disk dynamo, and the armature with two windings for sub-station distribution. Honestly, it's not feasible within our limited space to provide even a brief overview of Edison's extensive and groundbreaking work on the dynamo-electric machine, which is reflected in his numerous experiments and over one hundred patents. Therefore, we've focused on highlighting a few key and fundamental aspects, leaving it to those who are interested to explore the patents and the technical literature from the long period during which Edison's work took place.
Although he has not given any attention to the subject of generators for many years, an interesting instance of his incisive method of overcoming minor difficulties occurred while the present volumes were under preparation (1909). Carbon for commutator brushes has been superseded by graphite in some cases, the latter material being found much more advantageous, electrically. Trouble developed, however, for the reason that while carbon was hard and would wear away the mica insulation simultaneously with the copper, graphite, being softer, would wear away only the copper, leaving ridges of mica and thus causing sparking through unequal contact. At this point Edison was asked to diagnose the trouble and provide a remedy. He suggested the cutting out of the mica pieces almost to the bottom, leaving the commutator bars separated by air-spaces. This scheme was objected to on the ground that particles of graphite would fill these air-spaces and cause a short-circuit. His answer was that the air-spaces constituted the value of his plan, as the particles of graphite falling into them would be thrown out by the action of centrifugal force as the commutator revolved. And thus it occurred as a matter of fact, and the trouble was remedied. This idea was subsequently adopted by a great manufacturer of generators.
Although he hadn't focused on generators for many years, an interesting example of his sharp problem-solving approach came up while working on these volumes (1909). In some cases, carbon for commutator brushes was replaced by graphite, as the latter was found to be much more effective electrically. However, problems arose because while carbon was hard and wore down the mica insulation at the same rate as the copper, graphite, being softer, would only wear down the copper, leaving mica ridges and causing sparking due to uneven contact. At this point, Edison was asked to figure out the issue and suggest a solution. He proposed cutting out the mica pieces nearly to the bottom, leaving air spaces between the commutator bars. This idea faced objections, as people worried that graphite particles would fill the air spaces and create a short circuit. His response was that the air spaces were crucial to his plan, as the graphite particles would be expelled by centrifugal force during commutator rotation. This actually happened, and the problem was solved. A major generator manufacturer later adopted this idea.
XI. THE EDISON FEEDER SYSTEM
TO quote from the preamble of the specifications of United States Patent No. 264,642, issued to Thomas A. Edison September 19, 1882: "This invention relates to a method of equalizing the tension or 'pressure' of the current through an entire system of electric lighting or other translation of electric force, preventing what is ordinarily known as a 'drop' in those portions of the system the more remote from the central station...."
TO quote from the preamble of the specifications of United States Patent No. 264,642, issued to Thomas A. Edison September 19, 1882: "This invention relates to a method of equalizing the tension or 'pressure' of the current throughout an entire system of electric lighting or other applications of electric force, preventing what is commonly known as a 'drop' in the parts of the system that are farther away from the central station...."
The problem which was solved by the Edison feeder system was that relating to the equal distribution of current on a large scale over extended areas, in order that a constant and uniform electrical pressure could be maintained in every part of the distribution area without prohibitory expenditure for copper for mains and conductors.
The issue addressed by the Edison feeder system was how to evenly distribute current on a large scale across wide areas, so that a steady and consistent electrical pressure could be maintained in every part of the distribution area without excessive costs for copper for mains and conductors.
This problem had a twofold aspect, although each side was inseparably bound up in the other. On the one hand it was obviously necessary in a lighting system that each lamp should be of standard candle-power, and capable of interchangeable use on any part of the system, giving the same degree of illumination at every point, whether near to or remote from the source of electrical energy. On the other hand, this must be accomplished by means of a system of conductors so devised and arranged that while they would insure the equal pressure thus demanded, their mass and consequent cost would not exceed the bounds of practical and commercially economical investment.
This problem had two main aspects, both of which were closely connected. On one hand, it was clearly essential for a lighting system to have each lamp meet standard candlepower and be interchangeable throughout the system, providing the same level of illumination at every point, whether close to or far from the power source. On the other hand, this needed to be achieved with a network of conductors designed and arranged in such a way that they ensured the required equal pressure, while also keeping their size and cost within the limits of practical and economically viable investment.
The great importance of this invention can be better understood and appreciated by a brief glance at the state of the art in 1878-79, when Edison was conducting the final series of investigations which culminated in his invention of the incandescent lamp and SYSTEM of lighting. At this time, and for some years previously, the scientific world had been working on the "subdivision of the electric light," as it was then termed. Some leading authorities pronounced it absolutely impossible of achievement on any extended scale, while a very few others, of more optimistic mind, could see no gleam of light through the darkness, but confidently hoped for future developments by such workers as Edison.
The significance of this invention is better understood by looking briefly at the state of technology in 1878-79, when Edison was finishing his final series of experiments that led to the creation of the incandescent lamp and lighting SYSTEM. During this time, and for several years prior, the scientific community had been focused on the "subdivision of the electric light," as it was called. Some prominent experts declared it completely impossible to achieve on a large scale, while only a handful of more optimistic individuals saw any hope, trusting that future advancements would come from innovators like Edison.
The earlier investigators, including those up to the period above named, thought of the problem as involving the subdivision of a FIXED UNIT of current, which, being sufficient to cause illumination by one large lamp, might be divided into a number of small units whose aggregate light would equal the candle-power of this large lamp. It was found, however, in their experiments that the contrary effect was produced, for with every additional lamp introduced in the circuit the total candle-power decreased instead of increasing. If they were placed in series the light varied inversely as the SQUARE of the number of lamps in circuit; while if they were inserted in multiple arc, the light diminished as the CUBE of the number in circuit. [29] The idea of maintaining a constant potential and of PROPORTIONING THE CURRENT to the number of lamps in circuit did not occur to most of these early investigators as a feasible method of overcoming the supposed difficulty.
The earlier researchers, including those up to the mentioned period, viewed the issue as one where a FIXED UNIT of current could be broken down. This unit was enough to power one large lamp, and they believed it could be divided into several smaller units that together would match the brightness of that large lamp. However, their experiments revealed the opposite effect: with each new lamp added to the circuit, the total brightness actually decreased instead of increasing. When the lamps were connected in series, the light output varied inversely with the SQUARE of the number of lamps in the circuit; when connected in parallel, the light diminished as the CUBE of the number of lamps increased. [29] Most of these early researchers didn't consider the idea of keeping a constant voltage and adjusting the current based on the number of lamps in the circuit as a practical solution to the supposed problem.
[Footnote 29: M. Fontaine, in his book on Electric Lighting (1877), showed that with the current of a battery composed of sixteen elements, one lamp gave an illumination equal to 54 burners; whereas two similar lamps, if introduced in parallel or multiple arc, gave the light of only 6 1/2 burners in all; three lamps of only 2 burners in all; four lamps of only 3/4 of one burner, and five lamps of 1/4 of a burner.]
[Footnote 29: M. Fontaine, in his book on Electric Lighting (1877), demonstrated that with the current from a battery made up of sixteen cells, one lamp produced light equal to 54 burners; however, adding two similar lamps in parallel or multiple arcs only generated the equivalent of 6.5 burners total; three lamps provided just 2 burners total; four lamps gave only 0.75 of a burner; and five lamps produced just 0.25 of a burner.]
It would also seem that although the general method of placing experimental lamps in multiple arc was known at this period, the idea of "drop" of electrical pressure was imperfectly understood, if, indeed, realized at all, as a most important item to be considered in attempting the solution of the problem. As a matter of fact, the investigators preceding Edison do not seem to have conceived the idea of a "system" at all; hence it is not surprising to find them far astray from the correct theory of subdivision of the electric current. It may easily be believed that the term "subdivision" was a misleading one to these early experimenters. For a very short time Edison also was thus misled, but as soon as he perceived that the problem was one involving the MULTIPLICATION OF CURRENT UNITS, his broad conception of a "system" was born.
It seems that although the general method of placing experimental lamps in multiple arcs was known at this time, the concept of "drop" in electrical pressure was not clearly understood, or perhaps not recognized at all, as a crucial factor to consider when trying to solve the problem. In fact, the researchers before Edison did not appear to have thought of a "system" at all; therefore, it's not surprising that they were quite far from the correct theory of subdividing the electric current. It's easy to believe that the term "subdivision" was confusing to these early experimenters. For a brief period, Edison was also misled, but as soon as he realized that the problem involved the MULTIPLICATION OF CURRENT UNITS, his broad idea of a "system" came to life.
Generally speaking, all conductors of electricity offer more or less resistance to the passage of current through them and in the technical terminology of electrical science the word "drop" (when used in reference to a system of distribution) is used to indicate a fall or loss of initial electrical pressure arising from the resistance offered by the copper conductors leading from the source of energy to the lamps. The result of this resistance is to convert or translate a portion of the electrical energy into another form—namely, heat, which in the conductors is USELESS and wasteful and to some extent inevitable in practice, but is to be avoided and remedied as far as possible.
Generally, all conductors of electricity provide varying levels of resistance to the flow of current. In electrical terminology, the term "drop" refers to a decrease or loss of initial electrical pressure caused by the resistance of the copper conductors that connect the energy source to the lamps. This resistance leads to a portion of the electrical energy being converted into heat, which is USELESS and wasteful in the conductors. While some heat is inevitable in practice, it should be minimized and addressed whenever possible.
It is true that in an electric-lighting system there is also a fall or loss of electrical pressure which occurs in overcoming the much greater resistance of the filament in an incandescent lamp. In this case there is also a translation of the energy, but here it accomplishes a USEFUL purpose, as the energy is converted into the form of light through the incandescence of the filament. Such a conversion is called "work" as distinguished from "drop," although a fall of initial electrical pressure is involved in each case.
It’s true that in an electric lighting system, there is also a drop or loss of electrical pressure that happens when overcoming the much greater resistance of the filament in an incandescent lamp. In this case, there is also a transfer of energy, but it serves a USEFUL purpose since the energy is transformed into light through the filament's incandescence. This kind of conversion is referred to as "work," as opposed to "drop," even though a decrease in initial electrical pressure is involved in both scenarios.
The percentage of "drop" varies according to the quantity of copper used in conductors, both as to cross-section and length. The smaller the cross-sectional area, the greater the percentage of drop. The practical effect of this drop would be a loss of illumination in the lamps as we go farther away from the source of energy. This may be illustrated by a simple diagram in which G is a generator, or source of energy, furnishing current at a potential or electrical pressure of 110 volts; 1 and 2 are main conductors, from which 110-volt lamps, L, are taken in derived circuits. It will be understood that the circuits represented in Fig. 1 are theoretically supposed to extend over a large area. The main conductors are sufficiently large in cross-section to offer but little resistance in those parts which are comparatively near the generator, but as the current traverses their extended length there is a gradual increase of resistance to overcome, and consequently the drop increases, as shown by the figures. The result of the drop in such a case would be that while the two lamps, or groups, nearest the generator would be burning at their proper degree of illumination, those beyond would give lower and lower candle-power, successively, until the last lamp, or group, would be giving only about two-thirds the light of the first two. In other words, a very slight drop in voltage means a disproportionately great loss in illumination. Hence, by using a primitive system of distribution, such as that shown by Fig. 1, the initial voltage would have to be so high, in order to obtain the proper candle-power at the end of the circuit, that the lamps nearest the generator would be dangerously overheated. It might be suggested as a solution of this problem that lamps of different voltages could be used. But, as we are considering systems of extended distribution employing vast numbers of lamps (as in New York City, where millions are in use), it will be seen that such a method would lead to inextricable confusion, and therefore be absolutely out of the question. Inasmuch as the percentage of drop decreases in proportion to the increased cross-section of the conductors, the only feasible plan would seem to be to increase their size to such dimensions as to eliminate the drop altogether, beginning with conductors of large cross-section and tapering off as necessary. This would, indeed, obviate the trouble, but, on the other hand, would give rise to a much more serious difficulty—namely, the enormous outlay for copper; an outlay so great as to be absolutely prohibitory in considering the electric lighting of large districts, as now practiced.
The percentage of "drop" changes based on the amount of copper used in conductors, considering both the cross-section and length. The smaller the cross-sectional area, the greater the percentage of drop. The practical effect of this drop is a loss of light in the lamps as we move further from the power source. This can be illustrated by a simple diagram where G is a generator, or energy source, providing current at a potential of 110 volts; 1 and 2 are main conductors, from which 110-volt lamps, L, are connected in derived circuits. It's understood that the circuits in Fig. 1 are theoretically meant to cover a large area. The main conductors are large enough in cross-section to have minimal resistance near the generator, but as the current travels their long length, the resistance gradually increases, leading to a greater drop, as indicated by the figures. As a result of this drop, while the two lamps or groups closest to the generator would be shining at their correct brightness, those further away would produce less and less light until the last lamp or group would only be emitting about two-thirds the light of the first two. In other words, a small drop in voltage results in a disproportionately large loss of illumination. Therefore, using a basic distribution system like the one shown in Fig. 1, the starting voltage would have to be extremely high to get adequate brightness at the end of the circuit, causing the lamps nearest the generator to overheat dangerously. One possible solution might be to use lamps with different voltages. However, since we’re looking at systems with extensive distributions that use many lamps (such as in New York City, where millions are in use), this approach would create overwhelming confusion and thus be totally impractical. Given that the percentage of drop decreases as the cross-section of the conductors increases, the most practical solution would be to increase their size enough to completely eliminate the drop, starting with large cross-sections and tapering down as necessary. While this would indeed solve the issue, it would lead to an even bigger problem—namely, the huge cost of copper, a cost so high that it would be completely unfeasible for the electric lighting of large areas as it’s currently done.
Another diagram will probably make this more clear. The reference figures are used as before, except that the horizontal lines extending from square marked G represent the main conductors. As each lamp requires and takes its own proportion of the total current generated, it is obvious that the size of the conductors to carry the current for a number of lamps must be as large as the sum of ALL the separate conductors which would be required to carry the necessary amount of current to each lamp separately. Hence, in a primitive multiple-arc system, it was found that the system must have conductors of a size equal to the aggregate of the individual conductors necessary for every lamp. Such conductors might either be separate, as shown above (Fig. 2), or be bunched together, or made into a solid tapering conductor, as shown in the following figure:
Another diagram will likely make this clearer. The reference figures are used as before, but the horizontal lines extending from the square marked G represent the main conductors. Since each lamp requires and draws its own share of the total current generated, it's clear that the size of the conductors needed to carry the current for multiple lamps must be the same as the sum of all the individual conductors required to supply the necessary current to each lamp separately. Therefore, in a basic multiple-arc system, it was determined that the system must have conductors sized to match the total of the individual conductors needed for every lamp. These conductors could either be separate, as shown above (Fig. 2), or grouped together, or made into a solid tapering conductor, as illustrated in the following figure:
The enormous mass of copper needed in such a system can be better appreciated by a concrete example. Some years ago Mr. W. J. Jenks made a comparative calculation which showed that such a system of conductors (known as the "Tree" system), to supply 8640 lamps in a territory extending over so small an area as nine city blocks, would require 803,250 pounds of copper, which at the then price of 25 cents per pound would cost $200,812.50!
The massive amount of copper required for this system can be better understood with a specific example. A few years ago, Mr. W. J. Jenks did a comparison that revealed that a network of conductors (called the "Tree" system) to supply 8,640 lights across a relatively small area of just nine city blocks would need 803,250 pounds of copper. At the price then of 25 cents per pound, that would total $200,812.50!
Such, in brief, was the state of the art, generally speaking, at the period above named (1878-79). As early in the art as the latter end of the year 1878, Edison had developed his ideas sufficiently to determine that the problem of electric illumination by small units could be solved by using incandescent lamps of high resistance and small radiating surface, and by distributing currents of constant potential thereto in multiple arc by means of a ramification of conductors, starting from a central source and branching therefrom in every direction. This was an equivalent of the method illustrated in Fig. 3, known as the "Tree" system, and was, in fact, the system used by Edison in the first and famous exhibition of his electric light at Menlo Park around the Christmas period of 1879. He realized, however, that the enormous investment for copper would militate against the commercial adoption of electric lighting on an extended scale. His next inventive step covered the division of a large city district into a number of small sub-stations supplying current through an interconnected network of conductors, thus reducing expenditure for copper to some extent, because each distribution unit was small and limited the drop.
In short, this was the state of the art, generally speaking, during the period mentioned (1878-79). By the end of 1878, Edison had developed his ideas enough to conclude that the issue of electric illumination with small units could be solved by using high-resistance incandescent lamps with a small radiating surface, and by distributing currents of constant potential in a multiple arc system through a network of conductors that started from a central source and branched out in every direction. This was similar to the method shown in Fig. 3, known as the "Tree" system, which was actually the system Edison used during the first famous exhibition of his electric light at Menlo Park around Christmas in 1879. However, he recognized that the huge investment in copper would hinder the widespread commercial adoption of electric lighting. His next inventive step involved dividing a large city area into several small sub-stations that supplied current through an interconnected network of conductors, thus somewhat reducing copper expenses, because each distribution unit was small and minimized the voltage drop.
His next development was the radical advancement of the state of the art to the feeder system, covered by the patent now under discussion. This invention swept away the tree and other systems, and at one bound brought into being the possibility of effectively distributing large currents over extended areas with a commercially reasonable investment for copper.
His next development was the groundbreaking improvement of the feeder system, covered by the patent currently under discussion. This invention eliminated the tree and other systems, and in one leap, made it possible to effectively distribute large currents over wide areas with a commercially viable investment for copper.
The fundamental principles of this invention were, first, to sever entirely any direct connection of the main conductors with the source of energy; and, second, to feed current at a constant potential to central points in such main conductors by means of other conductors, called "feeders," which were to be connected directly with the source of energy at the central station. This idea will be made more clear by reference to the following simple diagram, in which the same letters are used as before, with additions:
The basic principles of this invention were, first, to completely cut off any direct connection of the main conductors with the energy source; and, second, to supply current at a constant voltage to central points in those main conductors using other conductors, known as "feeders," which were directly connected to the energy source at the central station. This concept will be clarified by referring to the following simple diagram, which uses the same letters as before, with additional details:
In further elucidation of the diagram, it may be considered that the mains are laid in the street along a city block, more or less distant from the station, while the feeders are connected at one end with the source of energy at the station, their other extremities being connected to the mains at central points of distribution. Of course, this system was intended to be applied in every part of a district to be supplied with current, separate sets of feeders running out from the station to the various centres. The distribution mains were to be of sufficiently large size that between their most extreme points the loss would not be more than 3 volts. Such a slight difference would not make an appreciable variation in the candle-power of the lamps.
To further explain the diagram, you can think of the mains being laid out in the street along a city block, positioned at varying distances from the station. The feeders connect at one end to the energy source at the station, with their other ends linked to the mains at key distribution points. This system was designed to cover every area in a district that needed power, with separate sets of feeders extending from the station to different centers. The distribution mains were meant to be large enough so that the voltage drop between the farthest points wouldn't exceed 3 volts. Such a small difference would not significantly affect the brightness of the lamps.
By the application of these principles, the inevitable but useless loss, or "drop," required by economy might be incurred, but was LOCALIZED IN THE FEEDERS, where it would not affect the uniformity of illumination of the lamps in any of the circuits, whether near to or remote from the station, because any variations of loss in the feeders would not give rise to similar fluctuations in any lamp circuit. The feeders might be operated at any desired percentage of loss that would realize economy in copper, so long as they delivered current to the main conductors at the potential represented by the average voltage of the lamps.
By applying these principles, the unavoidable but unnecessary loss, or "drop," that comes with economy could occur, but was LOCALIZED IN THE FEEDERS, preventing it from affecting the uniformity of the lamps' illumination in any of the circuits, whether close to or far from the station. This is because any variations in loss in the feeders wouldn't cause similar fluctuations in any lamp circuit. The feeders could operate at any desired percentage of loss that would achieve savings in copper, as long as they delivered current to the main conductors at a voltage that matched the average voltage of the lamps.
Thus the feeders could be made comparatively small in cross-section. It will be at once appreciated that, inasmuch as the mains required to be laid ONLY along the blocks to be lighted, and were not required to be run all the way to the central station (which might be half a mile or more away), the saving of copper by Edison's feeder system was enormous. Indeed, the comparative calculation of Mr. Jenks, above referred to, shows that to operate the same number of lights in the same extended area of territory, the feeder system would require only 128,739 pounds of copper, which, at the then price of 25 cents per pound, would cost only $39,185, or A SAVING of $168,627.50 for copper in this very small district of only nine blocks.
So, the feeders could be made relatively small in size. It's easy to see that since the mains only needed to be laid along the blocks that needed lighting and didn’t have to run all the way to the central station (which could be half a mile or more away), Edison's feeder system saved a huge amount of copper. In fact, Mr. Jenks's calculations mentioned earlier indicate that to operate the same number of lights over the same large area, the feeder system would only need 128,739 pounds of copper, which, at the price of 25 cents per pound at that time, would only cost $39,185. This represents a savings of $168,627.50 for copper in this very small area of just nine blocks.
An additional illustration, appealing to the eye, is presented in the following sketch, in which the comparative masses of copper of the tree and feeder systems for carrying the same current are shown side by side:
An additional visual example, appealing to the eye, is presented in the following sketch, where the comparative amounts of copper in the tree and feeder systems for carrying the same current are displayed side by side:
XII. THE THREE-WIRE SYSTEM
THIS invention is covered by United States Patent No. 274,290, issued to Edison on March 20, 1883. The object of the invention was to provide for increased economy in the quantity of copper employed for the main conductors in electric light and power installations of considerable extent at the same time preserving separate and independent control of each lamp, motor, or other translating device, upon any one of the various distribution circuits.
THIS invention is protected by United States Patent No. 274,290, granted to Edison on March 20, 1883. The purpose of the invention was to increase efficiency in the amount of copper used for the main conductors in large electric light and power systems while still allowing separate and independent control of each lamp, motor, or other device on any of the various distribution circuits.
Immediately prior to this invention the highest state of the art of electrical distribution was represented by Edison's feeder system, which has already been described as a straight parallel or multiple-arc system wherein economy of copper was obtained by using separate sets of conductors—minus load—feeding current at standard potential or electrical pressure into the mains at centres of distribution.
Right before this invention, the most advanced electrical distribution system was Edison's feeder system. It's been described as a straight parallel or multiple-arc system that saved on copper by using separate sets of conductors—without load—delivering current at standard voltage into the mains at distribution points.
It should be borne in mind that the incandescent lamp which was accepted at the time as a standard (and has so remained to the present day) was a lamp of 110 volts or thereabouts. In using the word "standard," therefore, it is intended that the same shall apply to lamps of about that voltage, as well as to electrical circuits of the approximate potential to operate them.
It should be kept in mind that the incandescent lamp that was accepted at the time as a standard (and has remained so to this day) was a lamp of around 110 volts. Therefore, when using the term "standard," it is meant to apply to lamps of that voltage, as well as to electrical circuits with similar potential to operate them.
Briefly stated, the principle involved in the three-wire system is to provide main circuits of double the standard potential, so as to operate standard lamps, or other translating devices, in multiple series of two to each series; and for the purpose of securing independent, individual control of each unit, to divide each main circuit into any desired number of derived circuits of standard potential (properly balanced) by means of a central compensating conductor which would be normally neutral, but designed to carry any minor excess of current that might flow by reason of any temporary unbalancing of either side of the main circuit.
In simple terms, the principle behind the three-wire system is to create main circuits that have double the standard voltage, allowing for the operation of standard lamps or other devices in multiple series of two for each series. To ensure independent control of each unit, the system divides each main circuit into any number of derived circuits at standard voltage (properly balanced) using a central compensating conductor. This conductor is usually neutral but is designed to handle any slight excess of current that might occur due to temporary imbalances on either side of the main circuit.
Reference to the following diagrams will elucidate this principle more clearly than words alone can do. For the purpose of increased lucidity we will first show a plain multiple-series system.
Reference to the following diagrams will clarify this principle more clearly than words alone can. To make things clearer, we'll first display a simple multiple-series system.
In this diagram G<1S> and G<2S> represent two generators, each producing current at a potential of 110 volts. By connecting them in series this potential is doubled, thus providing a main circuit (P and N) of 220 volts. The figures marked L represent eight lamps of 110 volts each, in multiple series of two, in four derived circuits. The arrows indicate the flow of current. By this method each pair of lamps takes, together, only the same quantity or volume of current required by a single lamp in a simple multiple-arc system; and, as the cross-section of a conductor depends upon the quantity of current carried, such an arrangement as the above would allow the use of conductors of only one-fourth the cross-section that would be otherwise required. From the standpoint of economy of investment such an arrangement would be highly desirable, but considered commercially it is impracticable because the principle of independent control of each unit would be lost, as the turning out of a lamp in any series would mean the extinguishment of its companion also. By referring to the diagram it will be seen that each series of two forms one continuous path between the main conductors, and if this path be broken at any one point current will immediately cease to flow in that particular series.
In this diagram, G<1S> and G<2S> represent two generators, each producing current at a voltage of 110 volts. By connecting them in series, this voltage is doubled, creating a main circuit (P and N) of 220 volts. The figures marked L represent eight lamps of 110 volts each, arranged in multiples of two across four derived circuits. The arrows show the flow of current. With this setup, each pair of lamps only uses the same amount of current needed by a single lamp in a basic multiple-arc system. Since the size of a conductor depends on the amount of current it carries, this arrangement allows for conductors with only one-fourth the size that would normally be required. From an investment perspective, this setup is very appealing, but from a commercial standpoint, it is impractical because it would lose the ability to control each unit independently; turning off one lamp in a series would also turn off its partner. By looking at the diagram, you can see that each series of two creates one continuous path between the main conductors, and if this path is broken at any point, the current will immediately stop flowing in that specific series.
Edison, by his invention of the three-wire system, overcame this difficulty entirely, and at the same time conserved approximately, the saving of copper, as will be apparent from the following illustration of that system, in its simplest form.
Edison, with his invention of the three-wire system, completely solved this problem while also saving a significant amount of copper. This will be evident from the following illustration of that system in its simplest form.
The reference figures are similar to those in the preceding diagram, and all conditions are also alike except that a central compensating, or balancing, conductor, PN, is here introduced. This is technically termed the "neutral" wire, and in the discharge of its functions lies the solution of the problem of economical distribution. Theoretically, a three-wire installation is evenly balanced by wiring for an equal number of lamps on both sides. If all these lamps were always lighted, burned, and extinguished simultaneously the central conductor would, in fact, remain neutral, as there would be no current passing through it, except from lamp to lamp. In practice, however, no such perfect conditions can obtain, hence the necessity of the provision for balancing in order to maintain the principle of independent control of each unit.
The reference figures are similar to those in the previous diagram, and all conditions are also the same, except that a central compensating or balancing conductor, PN, is introduced here. This is technically called the "neutral" wire, and its function is key to solving the problem of economical distribution. Theoretically, a three-wire system is evenly balanced by connecting an equal number of lamps on both sides. If all these lamps were always turned on, burned, and turned off at the same time, the central conductor would actually stay neutral since no current would pass through it, except from lamp to lamp. In practice, though, such perfect conditions can’t be achieved, which is why balancing is necessary to maintain the principle of independent control for each unit.
It will be apparent that the arrangement shown in Fig. 2 comprises practically two circuits combined in one system, in which the central conductor, PN, in case of emergency, serves in two capacities—namely, as negative to generator G<1S> or as positive to generator G<2S>, although normally neutral. There are two sides to the system, the positive side being represented by the conductors P and PN, and the negative side by the conductors PN and N. Each side, if considered separately, has a potential of about 110 volts, yet the potential of the two outside conductors, P and N, is 220 volts. The lamps are 110 volts.
It will be clear that the setup shown in Fig. 2 consists of basically two circuits combined into one system, where the central conductor, PN, can serve two purposes in case of an emergency—specifically, as a negative for generator G<1S> or as a positive for generator G<2S>, although it’s normally neutral. The system has two sides: the positive side represented by the conductors P and PN, and the negative side represented by the conductors PN and N. If each side is looked at separately, it has a potential of about 110 volts, but the potential of the two outer conductors, P and N, is 220 volts. The lamps operate at 110 volts.
In practical use the operation of the system is as follows: If all the lamps were lighted the current would flow along P and through each pair of lamps to N, and so back to the source of energy. In this case the balance is preserved and the central wire remains neutral, as no return current flows through it to the source of energy. But let us suppose that one lamp on the positive side is extinguished. None of the other lamps is affected thereby, but the system is immediately thrown out of balance, and on the positive side there is an excess of current to this extent which flows along or through the central conductor and returns to the generator, the central conductor thus becoming the negative of that side of the system for the time being. If the lamp extinguished had been one of those on the negative side of the system results of a similar nature would obtain, except that the central conductor would for the time being become the positive of that side, and the excess of current would flow through the negative, N, back to the source of energy. Thus it will be seen that a three-wire system, considered as a whole, is elastic in that it may operate as one when in balance and as two when unbalanced, but in either event giving independent control of each unit.
In practical use, the system operates like this: When all the lamps are lit, the current flows along P and through each pair of lamps to N, and then back to the power source. In this situation, the system stays balanced and the central wire remains neutral since no return current flows through it to the power source. Now, if we assume that one lamp on the positive side goes out, none of the other lamps are affected, but the system immediately becomes unbalanced. On the positive side, there is now an excess of current that flows along or through the central conductor and returns to the generator, making the central conductor temporarily act as the negative side of the system. If the lamp that went out had been one on the negative side, a similar result would occur, except the central conductor would temporarily become the positive side, and the excess current would flow through the negative side, N, back to the power source. Thus, it's clear that a three-wire system, as a whole, is flexible; it can function as one unit when balanced and as two when unbalanced, while still allowing for independent control of each unit.
For simplicity of illustration a limited number of circuits, shown in Fig. 2, has been employed. In practice, however, where great numbers of lamps are in use (as, for instance, in New York City, where about 7,000,000 lamps are operated from various central stations), there is constantly occurring more or less change in the balance of many circuits extending over considerable distances, but of course there is a net result which is always on one side of the system or the other for the time being, and this is met by proper adjustment at the appropriate generator in the station.
For simplicity, a limited number of circuits, shown in Fig. 2, has been used. In reality, though, with a large number of lamps in operation (like in New York City, where about 7,000,000 lamps are powered from various central stations), changes in the balance of many circuits over long distances happen all the time. Still, there’s always a net result that shifts to one side of the system or the other for the moment, and this is managed by making the right adjustments at the appropriate generator in the station.
In order to make the explanation complete, there is presented another diagram showing a three-wire system unbalanced:
To provide a full explanation, another diagram is included that shows an unbalanced three-wire system:
The reference figures are used as before, but in this case the vertical lines represent branches taken from the main conductors into buildings or other spaces to be lighted, and the loops between these branch wires represent lamps in operation. It will be seen from this sketch that there are ten lamps on the positive side and twelve on the negative side. Hence, the net result is an excess of current equal to that required by two lamps flowing through the central or compensating conductor, which is now acting as positive to generator G<2S> The arrows show the assumed direction of flow of current throughout the system, and the small figures at the arrow-heads the volume of that current expressed in the number of lamps which it supplies.
The reference figures are the same as before, but in this case, the vertical lines represent branches taken from the main conductors into buildings or other areas that need lighting, and the loops between these branch wires represent lamps that are on. From this sketch, you can see that there are ten lamps on the positive side and twelve on the negative side. Therefore, the total result is an excess of current equivalent to what two lamps need, flowing through the central or compensating conductor, which is now acting as a positive to generator G<2S>. The arrows indicate the assumed direction of current flow throughout the system, and the small figures at the arrowheads show the volume of that current expressed as the number of lamps it supplies.
The commercial value of this invention may be appreciated from the fact that by the application of its principles there is effected a saving of 62 1/2 per cent. of the amount of copper over that which would be required for conductors in any previously devised two-wire system carrying the same load. This arises from the fact that by the doubling of potential the two outside mains are reduced to one-quarter the cross-section otherwise necessary. A saving of 75 per cent. would thus be assured, but the addition of a third, or compensating, conductor of the same cross-section as one of the outside mains reduces the total saving to 62 1/2 per cent.
The commercial value of this invention can be seen in the fact that by applying its principles, you save 62.5% of the copper needed compared to what would be required for conductors in any previously designed two-wire system carrying the same load. This is because by doubling the voltage, the two outer wires are reduced to one-quarter of the cross-section that would otherwise be necessary. A 75% savings could be achieved, but adding a third, or compensating, conductor with the same cross-section as one of the outer wires reduces the total savings to 62.5%.
The three-wire system is in universal use throughout the world at the present day.
The three-wire system is used worldwide today.
XIII. EDISON'S ELECTRIC RAILWAY
AS narrated in Chapter XVIII, there were two electric railroads installed by Edison at Menlo Park—one in 1880, originally a third of a mile long, but subsequently increased to about a mile in length, and the other in 1882, about three miles long. As the 1880 road was built very soon after Edison's notable improvements in dynamo machines, and as the art of operating them to the best advantage was then being developed, this early road was somewhat crude as compared with the railroad of 1882; but both were practicable and serviceable for the purpose of hauling passengers and freight. The scope of the present article will be confined to a description of the technical details of these two installations.
AS narrated in Chapter XVIII, there were two electric railroads set up by Edison at Menlo Park—one in 1880, which started off at a third of a mile long but was later extended to about a mile, and another in 1882, which was around three miles long. Since the 1880 line was constructed shortly after Edison's significant improvements to dynamo machines, and the techniques for operating them effectively were still being developed, this early line was a bit basic compared to the railroad built in 1882; however, both were functional and effective for transporting passengers and freight. The focus of this article will be on the technical details of these two installations.
The illustration opposite page 454 of the preceding narrative shows the first Edison locomotive and train of 1880 at Menlo Park.
The illustration on page 454 of the previous story shows the first Edison locomotive and train from 1880 at Menlo Park.
For the locomotive a four-wheel iron truck was used, and upon it was mounted one of the long "Z" type 110-volt Edison dynamos, with a capacity of 75 amperes, which was to be used as a motor. This machine was laid on its side, its armature being horizontal and located toward the front of the locomotive.
For the train, a four-wheel iron truck was used, and on it was mounted one of the long "Z" type 110-volt Edison dynamos, with a capacity of 75 amperes, which would serve as a motor. This machine was placed on its side, with its armature positioned horizontally toward the front of the locomotive.
We now quote from an article by Mr. E. W. Hammer, published in the Electrical World, New York, June 10, 1899, and afterward elaborated and reprinted in a volume entitled Edisonia, compiled and published under the auspices of a committee of the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, in 1904: "The gearing originally employed consisted of a friction-pulley upon the armature shaft, another friction-pulley upon the driven axle, and a third friction-pulley which could be brought in contact with the other two by a suitable lever. Each wheel of the locomotive was made with metallic rim and a centre portion made of wood or papier-mache. A three-legged spider connected the metal rim of each front wheel to a brass hub, upon which rested a collecting brush. The other wheels were subsequently so equipped. It was the intention, therefore, that the current should enter the locomotive wheels at one side, and after passing through the metal spiders, collecting brushes and motor, would pass out through the corresponding brushes, spiders, and wheels to the other rail."
We now quote from an article by Mr. E. W. Hammer, published in the Electrical World, New York, on June 10, 1899, and later expanded and reprinted in a book titled Edisonia, put together and published by a committee from the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies in 1904: "The original gearing used consisted of a friction pulley on the armature shaft, another friction pulley on the driven axle, and a third friction pulley that could be activated to make contact with the other two using a lever. Each locomotive wheel had a metal rim and a center section made of wood or papier-mâché. A three-legged spider connected the metal rim of each front wheel to a brass hub, which held a collecting brush. Eventually, the other wheels were equipped in the same way. The design intended for the current to enter through the locomotive wheels on one side, pass through the metal spiders, collecting brushes, and the motor, and exit through the corresponding brushes, spiders, and wheels to the other rail."
As to the road: "The rails were light and were spiked to ordinary sleepers, with a gauge of about three and one-half feet. The sleepers were laid upon the natural grade, and there was comparatively no effort made to ballast the road. . . . No special precautions were taken to insulate the rails from the earth or from each other."
As for the road: "The tracks were lightweight and were fastened to regular sleepers, with a width of about three and a half feet. The sleepers were placed on the natural ground level, and not much effort was made to support the road with ballast. . . . No particular measures were taken to separate the rails from the ground or from one another."
The road started about fifty feet away from the generating station, which in this case was the machine shop. Two of the "Z" type dynamos were used for generating the current, which was conveyed to the two rails of the road by underground conductors.
The road began around fifty feet from the power station, which in this case was the machine shop. Two "Z" type dynamos were used to generate the electricity, which was sent to the two rails of the road through underground wires.
On Thursday, May 13, 1880, at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, this historic locomotive made its first trip, packed with as many of the "boys" as could possibly find a place to hang on. "Everything worked to a charm, until, in starting up at one end of the road, the friction gearing was brought into action too suddenly and it was wrecked. This accident demonstrated that some other method of connecting the armature with the driven axle should be arranged.
On Thursday, May 13, 1880, at 4 PM, this historic locomotive took its first trip, filled with as many of the "boys" as could find a spot to hang on. "Everything went smoothly until, when starting up at one end of the track, the friction gear was engaged too abruptly and it got wrecked. This accident showed that a different way to connect the armature with the driven axle needed to be arranged.
"As thus originally operated, the motor had its field circuit in permanent connection as a shunt across the rails, and this field circuit was protected by a safety-catch made by turning up two bare ends of the wire in its circuit and winding a piece of fine copper wire across from one bare end to the other. The armature circuit had a switch in it which permitted the locomotive to be reversed by reversing the direction of current flow through the armature.
"As it was originally set up, the motor had its field circuit permanently connected as a shunt across the rails, and this field circuit was protected by a safety catch created by twisting two bare wire ends in its circuit and wrapping a piece of fine copper wire from one bare end to the other. The armature circuit included a switch that allowed the locomotive to be reversed by changing the direction of current flow through the armature."
"After some consideration of the gearing question, it was decided to employ belts instead of the friction-pulleys." Accordingly, Edison installed on the locomotive a system of belting, including an idler-pulley which was used by means of a lever to tighten the main driving-belt, and thus power was applied to the driven axle. This involved some slipping and consequent burning of belts; also, if the belt were prematurely tightened, the burning-out of the armature. This latter event happened a number of times, "and proved to be such a serious annoyance that resistance-boxes were brought out from the laboratory and placed upon the locomotive in series with the armature. This solved the difficulty. The locomotive would be started with these resistance-boxes in circuit, and after reaching full speed the operator could plug the various boxes out of circuit, and in that way increase the speed." To stop, the armature circuit was opened by the main switch and the brake applied.
"After some thought about the gearing issue, it was decided to use belts instead of friction pulleys." So, Edison set up a belting system on the locomotive, which included an idler pulley that could be tightened using a lever to adjust the main driving belt, thereby applying power to the driven axle. This caused some slipping and burning of belts; plus, if the belt was tightened too soon, it would burn out the armature. This happened several times, "and it became such a significant hassle that resistance boxes were taken from the lab and added to the locomotive in series with the armature. This resolved the problem. The locomotive would be started with these resistance boxes connected, and once it reached full speed, the operator could unplug the boxes one by one, allowing the speed to increase." To stop, the main switch would open the armature circuit, and the brake would be applied.
This arrangement was generally satisfactory, but the resistance-boxes scattered about the platform and foot-rests being in the way, Edison directed that some No. 8 B. & S. copper wire be wound on the lower leg of the motor field-magnet. "By doing this the resistance was put where it would take up the least room, and where it would serve as an additional field-coil when starting the motor, and it replaced all the resistance-boxes which had heretofore been in plain sight. The boxes under the seat were still retained in service. The coil of coarse wire was in series with the armature, just as the resistance-boxes had been, and could be plugged in or out of circuit at the will of the locomotive driver. The general arrangement thus secured was operated as long as this road was in commission."
This setup was mostly effective, but the resistance boxes scattered around the platform and footrests were in the way. Edison instructed that some No. 8 B. & S. copper wire be wound around the lower leg of the motor field magnet. "This way, the resistance was placed where it took up the least space and also acted as an extra field coil when starting the motor, replacing all the resistance boxes that had previously been in plain sight. The boxes under the seat were still kept in use. The coil of coarse wire was connected in series with the armature, just like the resistance boxes had been, and could be plugged in or out of the circuit at the discretion of the locomotive driver. The overall arrangement worked effectively for as long as this road was operational."
On this short stretch of road there were many sharp curves and steep grades, and in consequence of the high speed attained (as high as forty-two miles an hour) several derailments took place, but fortunately without serious results. Three cars were in service during the entire time of operating this 1880 railroad: one a flat-car for freight; one an open car with two benches placed back to back; and the third a box-car, familiarly known as the "Pullman." This latter car had an interesting adjunct in an electric braking system (covered by Edison's Patent No. 248,430). "Each car axle had a large iron disk mounted on and revolving with it between the poles of a powerful horseshoe electromagnet. The pole-pieces of the magnet were movable, and would be attracted to the revolving disk when the magnet was energized, grasping the same and acting to retard the revolution of the car axle."
On this short stretch of road, there were many sharp curves and steep grades. Because of the high speed reached (up to forty-two miles per hour), several derailments occurred, but fortunately without serious consequences. Three cars were used the entire time this railroad operated in 1880: one flat car for freight, one open car with two benches facing each other, and the third was a box car, commonly known as the "Pullman." This last car had an interesting feature: an electric braking system (covered by Edison's Patent No. 248,430). “Each car axle had a large iron disk mounted on it, rotating between the poles of a powerful horseshoe electromagnet. The pole pieces of the magnet were movable and would be attracted to the spinning disk when the magnet was energized, clamping onto it and slowing down the rotation of the car axle.”
Interesting articles on Edison's first electric railroad were published in the technical and other papers, among which may be mentioned the New York Herald, May 15 and July 23, 1880; the New York Graphic, July 27, 1880; and the Scientific American, June 6, 1880.
Interesting articles about Edison's first electric railroad were published in various technical and other publications, including the New York Herald on May 15 and July 23, 1880; the New York Graphic on July 27, 1880; and Scientific American on June 6, 1880.
Edison's second electric railroad of 1882 was more pretentious as regards length, construction, and equipment. It was about three miles long, of nearly standard gauge, and substantially constructed. Curves were modified, and grades eliminated where possible by the erection of numerous trestles. This road also had some features of conventional railroads, such as sidings, turn-tables, freight platform, and car-house. "Current was supplied to the road by underground feeder cables from the dynamo-room of the laboratory. The rails were insulated from the ties by giving them two coats of japan, baking them in the oven, and then placing them on pads of tar-impregnated muslin laid on the ties. The ends of the rails were not japanned, but were electroplated, to give good contact surfaces for fish-plates and copper bonds."
Edison's second electric railroad from 1882 was more ambitious in terms of length, design, and equipment. It measured about three miles long, was nearly standard gauge, and was built sturdily. Curves were adjusted and inclines reduced where possible by building several trestles. This railroad also included some features typical of conventional railroads, such as sidings, turntables, a freight platform, and a car house. "Power was provided to the line through underground feeder cables from the dynamo room of the laboratory. The rails were insulated from the ties by applying two coats of Japan varnish, baking them in an oven, and then placing them on pads made of tar-treated muslin laid on the ties. The ends of the rails were not varnished but were electroplated to ensure good contact surfaces for fishplates and copper bonds."
The following notes of Mr. Frederick A. Scheffler, who designed the passenger locomotive for the 1882 road, throw an interesting light on its technical details:
The following notes from Mr. Frederick A. Scheffler, who designed the passenger locomotive for the 1882 road, provide intriguing insights into its technical details:
"In May, 1881, I was engaged by Mr. M. F. Moore, who was the first General Manager of the Edison Company for Isolated Lighting, as a draftsman to undertake the work of designing and building Edison's electric locomotive No. 2.
"In May 1881, I was hired by Mr. M. F. Moore, the first General Manager of the Edison Company for Isolated Lighting, as a draftsman to design and build Edison's electric locomotive No. 2."
"Previous to that time I had been employed in the engineering department of Grant Locomotive Works, Paterson, New Jersey, and the Rhode Island Locomotive Works, Providence, Rhode Island....
"Before that, I had worked in the engineering department of Grant Locomotive Works in Paterson, New Jersey, and the Rhode Island Locomotive Works in Providence, Rhode Island....
"It was Mr. Edison's idea, as I understood it at that time, to build a locomotive along the general lines of steam locomotives (at least, in outward appearance), and to combine in that respect the framework, truck, and other parts known to be satisfactory in steam locomotives at the same time.
"It was Mr. Edison's idea, as I understood it back then, to create a locomotive that resembled steam locomotives (at least in how it looked) and to incorporate the framework, truck, and other components that were known to work well in steam locomotives."
"This naturally required the services of a draftsman accustomed to steam-locomotive practice.... Mr. Moore was a man of great railroad and locomotive experience, and his knowledge in that direction was of great assistance in the designing and building of this locomotive.
"This naturally required the expertise of a draftsman well-versed in steam locomotive practices. Mr. Moore was a highly experienced professional in railroads and locomotives, and his knowledge in that field played a crucial role in the design and construction of this locomotive."
"At that time I had no knowledge of electricity.... One could count so-called electrical engineers on his fingers then, and have some fingers left over.
"Back then, I knew nothing about electricity.... You could count the so-called electrical engineers on one hand and still have fingers left over."
"Consequently, the ELECTRICAL equipment was designed by Mr. Edison and his assistants. The data and parts, such as motor, rheostat, switches, etc., were given to me, and my work was to design the supporting frame, axles, countershafts, driving mechanism, speed control, wheels and boxes, cab, running board, pilot (or 'cow-catcher'), buffers, and even supports for the headlight. I believe I also designed a bell and supports. From this it will be seen that the locomotive had all the essential paraphernalia to make it LOOK like a steam locomotive.
"Therefore, the electrical equipment was created by Mr. Edison and his team. They provided me with the data and components, like the motor, rheostat, switches, etc., and my job was to design the supporting frame, axles, countershafts, driving mechanism, speed control, wheels and boxes, cab, running board, pilot (or 'cow-catcher'), buffers, and even the supports for the headlight. I think I also designed a bell and its supports. From this, it’s clear that the locomotive had all the necessary features to make it look like a steam locomotive."
"The principal part of the outfit was the electric motor. At that time motors were curiosities. There were no electric motors even for stationary purposes, except freaks built for experimental uses. This motor was made from the parts—such as fields, armature, commutator, shaft and bearings, etc., of an Edison 'Z,' or 60-light dynamo. It was the only size of dynamo that the Edison Company had marketed at that time.... As a motor, it was wound to run at maximum speed to develop a torque equal to about fifteen horse-power with 220 volts. At the generating station at Menlo Park four Z dynamos of 110 volts were used, connected two in series, in multiple arc, giving a line voltage of 220.
The main part of the setup was the electric motor. Back then, motors were still a novelty. There weren't any electric motors available for stationary use, except for odd ones made for experimentation. This motor was constructed from the components—like fields, armature, commutator, shaft, and bearings—of an Edison 'Z,' or 60-light dynamo. It was the only size of dynamo that the Edison Company had sold at that time... As a motor, it was designed to run at maximum speed to produce a torque equivalent to about fifteen horsepower with 220 volts. At the generating station in Menlo Park, four Z dynamos of 110 volts were used, connected two in series in multiple arc, resulting in a line voltage of 220.
"The motor was located in the front part of the locomotive, on its side, with the armature shaft across the frames, or parallel with the driving axles.
"The motor was positioned at the front of the locomotive, on its side, with the armature shaft running across the frames, parallel to the driving axles."
"On account of the high speed of the armature shaft it was not possible to connect with driving-axles direct, but this was an advantage in one way, as by introducing an intermediate counter-shaft (corresponding to the well-known type of double-reduction motor used on trolley-cars since 1885), a fairly good arrangement was obtained to regulate the speed of the locomotive, exclusive of resistance in the electric circuit.
"Because of the high speed of the armature shaft, it wasn't possible to connect directly to the driving axles. However, this turned out to be an advantage, as by adding an intermediate counter-shaft (similar to the well-known double-reduction motor used in trolley cars since 1885), a decent setup was created to control the speed of the locomotive, without considering the resistance in the electric circuit."
"Endless leather belting was used to transmit the power from the motor to the counter-shaft, and from the latter to the driving-wheels, which were the front pair. A vertical idler-pulley was mounted in a frame over the belt from motor to counter-shaft, terminating in a vertical screw and hand-wheel for tightening the belt to increase speed, or the reverse to lower speed. This hand-wheel was located in the cab, where it was easily accessible....
"Endless leather belts were used to transfer power from the motor to the counter-shaft, and from there to the driving wheels, which were the front pair. A vertical idler pulley was mounted in a frame above the belt from the motor to the counter-shaft, ending in a vertical screw and hand-wheel for tightening the belt to increase speed, or loosening it to decrease speed. This hand-wheel was located in the cab for easy access....
"The rough outline sketched below shows the location of motor in relation to counter-shaft, belting, driving-wheels, idler, etc.:
The rough outline outlined below shows where the motor is located in relation to the counter-shaft, belting, driving wheels, idler, etc.:
"On account of both rails being used for circuits, . . . the driving-wheels had to be split circumferentially and completely insulated from the axles. This was accomplished by means of heavy wood blocks well shellacked or otherwise treated to make them water and weather proof, placed radially on the inside of the wheels, and then substantially bolted to the hubs and rims of the latter.
"Because both rails were used for circuits, the driving wheels needed to be split all the way around and completely insulated from the axles. This was done using heavy wood blocks that were well-coated or otherwise treated to make them waterproof and weather-resistant. These blocks were placed radially on the inside of the wheels and then securely bolted to the hubs and rims."
"The weight of the locomotive was distributed over the driving-wheels in the usual locomotive practice by means of springs and equalizers.
The weight of the locomotive was spread across the driving wheels in the standard locomotive method using springs and equalizers.
"The current was taken from the rims of the driving-wheels by a three-pronged collector of brass, against which flexible copper brushes were pressed—a simple manner of overcoming any inequalities of the road-bed.
"The current was taken from the edges of the driving wheels by a three-pronged brass collector, with flexible copper brushes pressed against it—a straightforward way to deal with any bumps in the road."
"The late Mr. Charles T. Hughes was in charge of the track construction at Menlo Park.... His work was excellent throughout, and the results were highly satisfactory so far as they could possibly be with the arrangement originally planned by Mr. Edison and his assistants.
The late Mr. Charles T. Hughes oversaw the track construction at Menlo Park.... His work was outstanding, and the outcomes were very satisfying given the setup originally planned by Mr. Edison and his team.
"Mr. Charles L. Clarke, one of the earliest electrical engineers employed by Mr. Edison, made a number of tests on this 1882 railroad. I believe that the engine driving the four Z generators at the power-house indicated as high as seventy horse-power at the time the locomotive was actually in service."
"Mr. Charles L. Clarke, one of the first electrical engineers hired by Mr. Edison, conducted several tests on this 1882 railroad. I believe that the engine powering the four Z generators at the power-house showed as much as seventy horsepower while the locomotive was in active service."
The electrical features of the 1882 locomotive were very similar to those of the earlier one, already described. Shunt and series field-windings were added to the motor, and the series windings could be plugged in and out of circuit as desired. The series winding was supplemented by resistance-boxes, also capable of being plugged in or out of circuit. These various electrical features are diagrammatically shown in Fig. 2, which also illustrates the connection with the generating plant.
The electrical features of the 1882 locomotive were very similar to those of the earlier model already described. Shunt and series field windings were added to the motor, and the series windings could be connected or disconnected as needed. The series winding was also supported by resistance boxes, which could be plugged in or out of the circuit. These various electrical features are illustrated in Fig. 2, which also shows the connection with the generating plant.
We quote again from Mr. Hammer, who says: "The freight-locomotive had single reduction gears, as is the modern practice, but the power was applied through a friction-clutch The passenger-locomotive was very speedy, and ninety passengers have been carried at a time by it; the freight-locomotive was not so fast, but could pull heavy trains at a good speed. Many thousand people were carried on this road during 1882." The general appearance of Edison's electric locomotive of 1882 is shown in the illustration opposite page 462 of the preceding narrative. In the picture Mr. Edison may be seen in the cab, and Mr. Insull on the front platform of the passenger-car.
We quote again from Mr. Hammer, who says: "The freight locomotive used single reduction gears, which is standard practice today, but the power was transmitted through a friction clutch. The passenger locomotive was very fast, carrying up to ninety passengers at a time; the freight locomotive wasn't as quick, but it could pull heavy trains at a decent speed. Many thousands of people used this railway in 1882." The general appearance of Edison's electric locomotive from 1882 is shown in the illustration on page 462 of the previous narrative. In the picture, Mr. Edison can be seen in the cab, and Mr. Insull is on the front platform of the passenger car.
XIV. TRAIN TELEGRAPHY
WHILE the one-time art of telegraphing to and from moving trains was essentially a wireless system, and allied in some of its principles to the art of modern wireless telegraphy through space, the two systems cannot, strictly speaking be regarded as identical, as the practice of the former was based entirely on the phenomenon of induction.
WHILE the earlier practice of sending messages to and from moving trains was basically a wireless system and shared some principles with modern wireless communication, the two systems can't really be considered the same since the earlier method relied completely on the phenomenon of induction.
Briefly described in outline, the train telegraph system consisted of an induction circuit obtained by laying strips of metal along the top or roof of a railway-car, and the installation of a special telegraph line running parallel with the track and strung on poles of only medium height. The train, and also each signalling station, was equipped with regulation telegraph apparatus, such as battery, key, relay, and sounder, together with induction-coil and condenser. In addition, there was a special transmitting device in the shape of a musical reed, or "buzzer." In practice, this buzzer was continuously operated at a speed of about five hundred vibrations per second by an auxiliary battery. Its vibrations were broken by means of a telegraph key into long and short periods, representing Morse characters, which were transmitted inductively from the train circuit to the pole line or vice versa, and received by the operator at the other end through a high-resistance telephone receiver inserted in the secondary circuit of the induction-coil.
In simple terms, the train telegraph system included an induction circuit made by placing metal strips on top of a railway car and a special telegraph line that ran alongside the track, supported by medium-height poles. Both the train and each signaling station were equipped with standard telegraph equipment, such as a battery, key, relay, and sounder, along with an induction coil and condenser. Additionally, there was a unique transmitting device shaped like a musical reed or "buzzer." In use, this buzzer operated continuously at around five hundred vibrations per second powered by an auxiliary battery. Its vibrations were interrupted using a telegraph key into long and short bursts that represented Morse code, which were transmitted inductively from the train circuit to the pole line or vice versa, and received by the operator at the other end through a high-resistance telephone receiver connected to the secondary circuit of the induction coil.
The accompanying diagrammatic sketch of a simple form of the system, as installed on a car, will probably serve to make this more clear.
The included diagram of a basic version of the system, as set up in a car, will likely help clarify this further.
An insulated wire runs from the metallic layers on the roof of the car to switch S, which is shown open in the sketch. When a message is to be received on the car from a station more or less remote, the switch is thrown to the left to connect with a wire running to the telephone receiver, T. The other wire from this receiver is run down to one of the axles and there permanently connected, thus making a ground. The operator puts the receiver to his ear and listens for the message, which the telephone renders audible in the Morse characters.
An insulated wire goes from the metal layers on the car's roof to switch S, which is shown open in the sketch. When a message is supposed to be received on the car from a somewhat distant station, the switch is flipped to the left to connect to a wire running to the telephone receiver, T. The other wire from this receiver goes down to one of the axles and is permanently connected there, creating a ground. The operator puts the receiver to his ear and listens for the message, which the telephone makes audible in Morse code.
If a message is to be transmitted from the car to a receiving station, near or distant, the switch, S, is thrown to the other side, thus connecting with a wire leading to one end of the secondary of induction-coil C. The other end of the secondary is connected with the grounding wire. The primary of the induction-coil is connected as shown, one end going to key K and the other to the buzzer circuit. The other side of the key is connected to the transmitting battery, while the opposite pole of this battery is connected in the buzzer circuit. The buzzer, R, is maintained in rapid vibration by its independent auxiliary battery, B<1S>.
If a message needs to be sent from the car to a receiving station, whether close by or far away, the switch, S, is flipped to the other side, connecting it to a wire that leads to one end of the induction coil's secondary winding, C. The other end of the secondary is linked to the grounding wire. The primary of the induction coil is set up as shown, with one end going to key K and the other to the buzzer circuit. The other side of the key is connected to the transmitting battery, while the opposite terminal of the battery is attached to the buzzer circuit. The buzzer, R, is kept vibrating rapidly by its own separate auxiliary battery, B<1S>.
When the key is pressed down the circuit is closed, and current from the transmitting battery, B, passes through primary of the coil, C, and induces a current of greatly increased potential in the secondary. The current as it passes into the primary, being broken up into short impulses by the tremendously rapid vibrations of the buzzer, induces similarly rapid waves of high potential in the secondary, and these in turn pass to the roof and thence through the intervening air by induction to the telegraph wire. By a continued lifting and depression of the key in the regular manner, these waves are broken up into long and short periods, and are thus transmitted to the station, via the wire, in Morse characters, dots and dashes.
When the key is pressed down, the circuit closes, and current from the transmitting battery, B, flows through the primary of the coil, C, inducing a much stronger current in the secondary. As the current moves into the primary, it gets fragmented into short impulses by the extremely fast vibrations of the buzzer, creating equally rapid waves of high potential in the secondary. These waves then travel to the roof and through the air by induction to the telegraph wire. By repeatedly lifting and pressing the key in a consistent manner, these waves are divided into long and short periods, which are then sent to the station via the wire in Morse code, represented by dots and dashes.
The receiving stations along the line of the railway were similarly equipped as to apparatus, and, generally speaking the operations of sending and receiving messages were substantially the same as above described.
The receiving stations along the railway line were similarly equipped with the same equipment, and, generally speaking, the processes for sending and receiving messages were essentially the same as described above.
The equipment of an operator on a car was quite simple consisting merely of a small lap-board, on which were mounted the key, coil, and buzzer, leaving room for telegraph blanks. To this board were also attached flexible conductors having spring clips, by means of which connections could be made quickly with conveniently placed terminals of the ground, roof, and battery wires. The telephone receiver was held on the head with a spring, the flexible connecting wire being attached to the lap board, thus leaving the operator with both hands free.
The setup for an operator in a car was pretty straightforward, just a small lap board with the key, coil, and buzzer mounted on it, leaving space for telegraph blanks. Also attached to this board were flexible wires with spring clips, allowing for quick connections to the conveniently located terminals of the ground, roof, and battery wires. The telephone receiver was secured on the head with a spring, and the flexible connecting wire was attached to the lap board, giving the operator both hands free.
The system, as shown in the sketch and elucidated by the text, represents the operation of train telegraphy in a simple form, but combining the main essentials of the art as it was successfully and commercially practiced for a number of years after Edison and Gilliland entered the field. They elaborated the system in various ways, making it more complete; but it has not been deemed necessary to enlarge further upon the technical minutiae of the art for the purpose of this work.
The system, illustrated in the sketch and explained in the text, demonstrates how train telegraphy works in a straightforward way, capturing the key elements of the practice as it was successfully and commercially used for several years after Edison and Gilliland joined the field. They improved the system in different ways, making it more comprehensive; however, it hasn't been considered necessary to delve deeper into the technical details of the practice for the purpose of this work.
XV. KINETOGRAPH AND PROJECTING KINETOSCOPE
ALTHOUGH many of the arts in which Edison has been a pioneer have been enriched by his numerous inventions and patents, which were subsequent to those of a fundamental nature, the (so-called) motion-picture art is an exception, as the following, together with three other additional patents [30] comprise all that he has taken out on this subject: United States Patent No. 589,168, issued August 31, 1897, reissued in two parts—namely, No. 12,037, under date of September 30,1902, and No. 12,192, under date of January 12, 1904. Application filed August 24, 1891.
ALTHOUGH many of the fields where Edison has been a pioneer have been enhanced by his many inventions and patents that came after the foundational ones, the so-called motion-picture industry is an exception. The following, along with three other additional patents [30], comprise all he has filed on this topic: United States Patent No. 589,168, issued August 31, 1897, reissued in two parts—No. 12,037 on September 30, 1902, and No. 12,192 on January 12, 1904. Application filed August 24, 1891.
[Footnote 30: Not 491,993, issued February 21, 1893; No. 493,426, issued March 14, 1893; No. 772,647, issued October 18, 1904.]
[Footnote 30: Not 491,993, issued February 21, 1893; No. 493,426, issued March 14, 1893; No. 772,647, issued October 18, 1904.]
There is nothing surprising in this, however, as the possibility of photographing and reproducing actual scenes of animate life are so thoroughly exemplified and rendered practicable by the apparatus and methods disclosed in the patents above cited, that these basic inventions in themselves practically constitute the art—its development proceeding mainly along the line of manufacturing details. That such a view of his work is correct, the highest criterion—commercial expediency—bears witness; for in spite of the fact that the courts have somewhat narrowed the broad claims of Edison's patents by reason of the investigations of earlier experimenters, practically all the immense amount of commercial work that is done in the motion-picture field to-day is accomplished through the use of apparatus and methods licensed under the Edison patents.
There’s nothing surprising about this. The ability to capture and replicate real scenes of living beings is so clearly demonstrated and made possible by the equipment and techniques mentioned in the patents above that these foundational inventions basically define the art form—its progress mainly hinges on manufacturing specifics. That this perspective on his work is accurate is supported by the ultimate standard—commercial practicality—because even though the courts have somewhat restricted the broad claims of Edison’s patents due to earlier research, nearly all of the extensive commercial work done in the motion picture industry today relies on equipment and methods licensed under the Edison patents.
The philosophy of this invention having already been described in Chapter XXI, it will be unnecessary to repeat it here. Suffice it to say by way of reminder that it is founded upon the physiological phenomenon known as the persistence of vision, through which a series of sequential photographic pictures of animate motion projected upon a screen in rapid succession will reproduce to the eye all the appearance of the original movements.
The concept behind this invention has already been explained in Chapter XXI, so there’s no need to go over it again. Just to remind you, it’s based on the physiological phenomenon called persistence of vision, which allows a series of quick, sequential photographic images of moving objects projected on a screen to recreate the original motion for the viewer.
Edison's work in this direction comprised the invention not only of a special form of camera for making original photographic exposures from a single point of view with very great rapidity, and of a machine adapted to effect the reproduction of such pictures in somewhat similar manner but also of the conception and invention of a continuous uniform, and evenly spaced tape-like film, so absolutely essential for both the above objects.
Edison's work in this area included not only the invention of a special type of camera that could take original photographs from one point of view very quickly, and a machine designed to reproduce those images in a similar way, but also the idea and creation of a continuous, uniform, and evenly spaced tape-like film, which was absolutely essential for both of these purposes.
The mechanism of such a camera, as now used, consists of many parts assembled in such contiguous proximity to each other that an illustration from an actual machine would not help to clearness of explanation to the general reader. Hence a diagram showing a sectional view of a simple form of such a camera is presented below.
The mechanism of a camera like this one currently in use consists of many parts assembled so closely together that an illustration from a real machine wouldn't clarify things for the average reader. Therefore, a diagram showing a sectional view of a simple version of this camera is provided below.
In this diagram, A represents an outer light-tight box containing a lens, C, and the other necessary mechanism for making the photographic exposures, H<1S> and H<2S> being cases for holding reels of film before and after exposure, F the long, tape-like film, G a sprocket whose teeth engage in perforations on the edges of the film, such sprocket being adapted to be revolved with an intermittent or step-by-step movement by hand or by motor, and B a revolving shutter having an opening and connected by gears with G, and arranged to expose the film during the periods of rest. A full view of this shutter is also represented, with its opening, D, in the small illustration to the right.
In this diagram, A represents an outer light-tight box that contains a lens, C, along with the other necessary mechanisms for making photographic exposures. H<1S> and H<2S> are cases for holding rolls of film before and after exposure. F is the long, tape-like film, G is a sprocket with teeth that fit into perforations on the edges of the film. This sprocket can be rotated in an intermittent or step-by-step manner by hand or motor. B is a revolving shutter with an opening, connected by gears to G, and set up to expose the film during rest periods. A full view of this shutter is also shown, with its opening, D, in the small illustration to the right.
In practice, the operation would be somewhat as follows, generally speaking: The lens would first be focussed on the animate scene to be photographed. On turning the main shaft of the camera the sprocket, G, is moved intermittently, and its teeth, catching in the holes in the sensitized film, draws it downward, bringing a new portion of its length in front of the lens, the film then remaining stationary for an instant. In the mean time, through gearing connecting the main shaft with the shutter, the latter is rotated, bringing its opening, D, coincident with the lens, and therefore exposing the film while it is stationary, after which the film again moves forward. So long as the action is continued these movements are repeated, resulting in a succession of enormously rapid exposures upon the film during its progress from reel H<1S> to its automatic rewinding on reel H<2S>. While the film is passing through the various parts of the machine it is guided and kept straight by various sets of rollers between which it runs, as indicated in the diagram.
In practice, the operation would generally go like this: First, the lens would be focused on the scene to be photographed. When you turn the main shaft of the camera, the sprocket, G, moves intermittently, and its teeth catch in the holes of the sensitized film, pulling it downwards and bringing a new section in front of the lens. The film then stays still for a moment. Meanwhile, through gears connecting the main shaft to the shutter, the shutter rotates, aligning its opening, D, with the lens, which exposes the film while it’s stationary. After that, the film moves forward again. As long as the action continues, these movements repeat, resulting in a series of extremely quick exposures on the film as it progresses from reel H<1S> to its automatic rewinding on reel H<2S>. While the film moves through the different parts of the machine, it's guided and kept straight by various sets of rollers, as shown in the diagram.
By an ingenious arrangement of the mechanism, the film moves intermittently so that it may have a much longer period of rest than of motion. As in practice the pictures are taken at a rate of twenty or more per second, it will be quite obvious that each period of rest is infinitesimally brief, being generally one-thirtieth of a second or less. Still it is sufficient to bring the film to a momentary condition of complete rest, and to allow for a maximum time of exposure, comparatively speaking, thus providing means for taking clearly defined pictures. The negatives so obtained are developed in the regular way, and the positive prints subsequently made from them are used for reproduction.
By cleverly organizing the mechanism, the film moves in short bursts, allowing it to rest much longer than it is in motion. Since pictures are usually taken at a rate of twenty or more per second, it's clear that each rest period is extremely brief, typically one-thirtieth of a second or less. However, this is still enough time for the film to come to a complete stop momentarily, allowing for a longer exposure time relative to the movement, which helps in capturing clear images. The negatives produced are developed in the usual manner, and the positive prints made from them are used for reproduction.
The reproducing machine, or, as it is called in practice, the Projecting Kinetoscope, is quite similar so far as its general operations in handling the film are concerned. In appearance it is somewhat different; indeed, it is in two parts, the one containing the lighting arrangements and condensing lens, and the other embracing the mechanism and objective lens. The "taking" camera must have its parts enclosed in a light-tight box, because of the undeveloped, sensitized film, but the projecting kinetoscope, using only a fully developed positive film, may, and, for purposes of convenient operation, must be accessibly open. The illustration (Fig. 2) will show the projecting apparatus as used in practice.
The reproducing machine, or what we call the Projecting Kinetoscope, is pretty similar in its basic functions of handling the film. It looks a bit different; in fact, it has two parts—one that holds the lighting setup and condensing lens, and the other that contains the mechanism and objective lens. The "taking" camera needs to have its components inside a light-tight box because of the undeveloped, sensitized film, but the projecting kinetoscope, which uses only fully developed positive film, can be conveniently open for operation. The illustration (Fig. 2) will show how the projecting apparatus is used in practice.
The philosophy of reproduction is very simple, and is illustrated diagrammatically in Fig. 3, reference letters being the same as in Fig. 1. As to the additional reference letters, I is a condenser J the source of light, and K a reflector.
The philosophy of reproduction is quite straightforward and is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 3, with reference letters matching those in Fig. 1. Regarding the extra reference letters, I is a condenser, J is the light source, and K is a reflector.
The positive film is moved intermittently but swiftly throughout its length between the objective lens and a beam of light coming through the condenser, being exposed by the shutter during the periods of rest. This results in a projection of the photographs upon a screen in such rapid succession as to present an apparently continuous photograph of the successive positions of the moving objects, which, therefore, appear to the human eye to be in motion.
The positive film is moved back and forth quickly along its length between the objective lens and a beam of light from the condenser, being exposed by the shutter during the breaks. This creates a projection of the photos on a screen so quickly that it looks like a continuous image of the moving objects, which makes them appear to be in motion to the human eye.
The first claim of Reissue Patent No. 12,192 describes the film. It reads as follows:
The first claim of Reissue Patent No. 12,192 describes the film. It reads as follows:
"An unbroken transparent or translucent tape-like photographic film having thereon uniform, sharply defined, equidistant photographs of successive positions of an object in motion as observed from a single point of view at rapidly recurring intervals of time, such photographs being arranged in a continuous straight-line sequence, unlimited in number save by the length of the film, and sufficient in number to represent the movements of the object throughout an extended period of time."
"An unbroken clear or see-through tape-like photographic film that has uniform, sharply defined, and evenly spaced images capturing different positions of a moving object as seen from a single viewpoint at quick time intervals. These images are arranged in a continuous straight-line sequence, with the number of images only limited by the length of the film, and enough in quantity to show the object's movements over a long period."
XVI. EDISON'S ORE-MILLING INVENTIONS
THE wide range of Edison's activities in this department of the arts is well represented in the diversity of the numerous patents that have been issued to him from time to time. These patents are between fifty and sixty in number, and include magnetic ore separators of ten distinct types; also breaking, crushing, and grinding rolls, conveyors, dust-proof bearings, screens, driers, mixers, bricking apparatus and machines, ovens, and processes of various kinds.
The wide variety of Edison's work in this area of the arts is clearly shown in the many patents that have been granted to him over the years. These patents number between fifty and sixty, and they include ten different types of magnetic ore separators, as well as machines for breaking, crushing, and grinding, conveyors, dust-proof bearings, screens, dryers, mixers, bricking equipment, ovens, and various processes.
A description of the many devices in each of these divisions would require more space than is available; hence, we shall confine ourselves to a few items of predominating importance, already referred to in the narrative, commencing with the fundamental magnetic ore separator, which was covered by United States Patent No. 228,329, issued June 1, 1880.
A description of the various devices in each of these sections would take up more space than we have, so we'll focus on a few key items mentioned earlier in the story, starting with the basic magnetic ore separator, which was covered by United States Patent No. 228,329, issued on June 1, 1880.
The illustration here presented is copied from the drawing forming part of this patent. A hopper with adjustable feed is supported several feet above a bin having a central partition. Almost midway between the hopper and the bin is placed an electromagnet whose polar extension is so arranged as to be a little to one side of a stream of material falling from the hopper. Normally, a stream of finely divided ore falling from the hopper would fall into that portion of the bin lying to the left of the partition. If, however, the magnet is energized from a source of current, the magnetic particles in the falling stream are attracted by and move toward the magnet, which is so placed with relation to the falling material that the magnetic particles cannot be attracted entirely to the magnet before gravity has carried them past. Hence, their trajectory is altered, and they fall on the right-hand side of the partition in the bin, while the non-magnetic portion of the stream continues in a straight line and falls on the other side, thus effecting a complete separation.
The illustration presented here is taken from the drawing included in this patent. A hopper with an adjustable feed is positioned several feet above a bin that has a central partition. Almost halfway between the hopper and the bin, there’s an electromagnet, oriented slightly to one side of the stream of material falling from the hopper. Normally, a stream of finely divided ore falling from the hopper would land on the left side of the partition in the bin. However, if the magnet is powered by a current source, the magnetic particles in the falling stream are attracted to the magnet. Its position relative to the falling material ensures that the magnetic particles cannot be entirely drawn to the magnet before gravity pulls them past it. As a result, their path is changed, causing them to fall on the right side of the partition in the bin, while the non-magnetic part of the stream continues straight and falls on the other side, achieving complete separation.
This simple but effective principle was the one employed by Edison in his great concentrating plant already described. In practice, the numerous hoppers, magnets, and bins were many feet in length; and they were arranged in batteries of varied magnetic strength, in order that the intermingled mass of crushed rock and iron ore might be more thoroughly separated by being passed through magnetic fields of successively increasing degrees of attracting power. Altogether there were about four hundred and eighty of these immense magnets in the plant, distributed in various buildings in batteries as above mentioned, the crushed rock containing the iron ore being delivered to them by conveyors, and the gangue and ore being taken away after separation by two other conveyors and delivered elsewhere. The magnetic separators at first used by Edison at this plant were of the same generality as the ones employed some years previously in the separation of sea-shore sand, but greatly enlarged and improved. The varied experiences gained in the concentration of vast quantities of ore led naturally to a greater development, and several new types and arrangements of magnetic separators were evolved and elaborated by him from first to last, during the progress of the work at the concentrating plant.
This straightforward yet effective principle was used by Edison in his previously described large concentrating plant. In practice, the numerous hoppers, magnets, and bins were several feet long, arranged in groups with varying magnetic strength, so that the mixed mass of crushed rock and iron ore could be better separated by passing through magnetic fields with progressively stronger attraction. In total, there were about four hundred eighty of these large magnets in the plant, located in different buildings as mentioned, with conveyors delivering the crushed rock containing the iron ore to them, and the waste and ore being removed after separation by two other conveyors and sent to other locations. The magnetic separators initially used by Edison in this plant were similar to those used years earlier for separating beach sand, but they were significantly larger and improved. The diverse experiences gained from concentrating large quantities of ore naturally led to further development, and several new types and configurations of magnetic separators were created and refined by him throughout the work at the concentrating plant.
The magnetic separation of iron from its ore being the foundation idea of the inventions now under discussion, a consideration of the separator has naturally taken precedence over those of collateral but inseparable interest. The ore-bearing rock, however, must first be ground to powder before it can be separated; hence, we will now begin at the root of this operation and consider the "giant rolls," which Edison devised for breaking huge masses of rock. In his application for United States Patent No. 672,616, issued April 23, 1901, applied for on July 16, 1897, he says: "The object of my invention is to produce a method for the breaking of rock which will be simple and effective, will not require the hand-sledging or blasting of the rock down to pieces of moderate size, and will involve the consumption of a small amount of power."
The magnetic separation of iron from its ore is the main idea behind the inventions we're discussing, so naturally, the focus has been on the separator rather than other related but equally important topics. However, the ore-bearing rock needs to be ground into a powder before separation can happen. Therefore, let's start by looking at the "giant rolls" that Edison designed for breaking large chunks of rock. In his application for United States Patent No. 672,616, issued on April 23, 1901, which he applied for on July 16, 1897, he states: "The goal of my invention is to create a simple and effective method for breaking rock that doesn't require hand-sledging or blasting to reduce it to manageable sizes and uses a small amount of power."
While this quotation refers to the method as "simple," the patent under consideration covers one of the most bold and daring projects that Edison has ever evolved. He proposed to eliminate the slow and expensive method of breaking large boulders manually, and to substitute therefor momentum and kinetic energy applied through the medium of massive machinery, which, in a few seconds, would break into small pieces a rock as big as an ordinary upright cottage piano, and weighing as much as six tons. Engineers to whom Edison communicated his ideas were unanimous in declaring the thing an impossibility; it was like driving two express-trains into each other at full speed to crack a great rock placed between them; that no practical machinery could be built to stand the terrific impact and strains. Edison's convictions were strong, however, and he persisted. The experiments were of heroic size, physically and financially, but after a struggle of several years and an expenditure of about $100,000, he realized the correctness and practicability of his plans in the success of the giant rolls, which were the outcome of his labors.
While this quote describes the method as "simple," the patent in question covers one of the boldest and most ambitious projects that Edison has ever developed. He aimed to replace the slow and costly process of manually breaking large boulders with momentum and kinetic energy applied through massive machinery that could, in just a few seconds, shatter a rock the size of an ordinary upright piano and weighing as much as six tons. Engineers who heard Edison's ideas were unanimous in declaring it impossible; it was like crashing two high-speed trains into each other to break a massive rock positioned between them, asserting that no practical machinery could withstand the incredible impact and stress. Nevertheless, Edison's beliefs were firm, and he pressed on. The experiments were incredibly large in scale, both physically and financially, but after several years of struggle and an investment of about $100,000, he proved the validity and feasibility of his plans with the success of the giant rollers that resulted from his efforts.
The giant rolls consist of a pair of iron cylinders of massive size and weight, with removable wearing plates having irregular surfaces formed by projecting knobs. These rolls are mounted side by side in a very heavy frame (leaving a gap of about fourteen inches between them), and are so belted up with the source of power that they run in opposite directions. The giant rolls described by Edison in the above-named patent as having been built and operated by him had a combined weight of 167,000 pounds, including all moving parts, which of themselves weighed about seventy tons, each roll being six feet in diameter and five feet long. A top view of the rolls is shown in the sketch, one roll and one of its bearings being shown in section.
The giant rolls consist of a pair of large iron cylinders that are extremely heavy, with removable wearing plates that have uneven surfaces shaped by protruding knobs. These rolls are set up side by side in a sturdy frame (leaving a space of about fourteen inches between them) and are connected to the power source in such a way that they rotate in opposite directions. The giant rolls mentioned by Edison in the previously referenced patent, which he built and operated, had a total weight of 167,000 pounds, including all moving parts, which alone weighed about seventy tons. Each roll is six feet in diameter and five feet long. A top view of the rolls is shown in the sketch, with one roll and one of its bearings depicted in section.
In Fig. 2 the rolls are illustrated diagrammatically. As a sketch of this nature, even if given with a definite scale, does not always carry an adequate idea of relative dimensions to a non-technical reader, we present in Fig. 3 a perspective illustration of the giant rolls as installed in the concentrating plant.
In Fig. 2, the rolls are shown in a diagram. Since a sketch like this, even with a clear scale, doesn't always provide a good sense of relative sizes to a non-technical audience, we present Fig. 3, which provides a perspective view of the giant rolls as they're set up in the concentrating plant.
In practice, a small amount of power is applied to run the giant rolls gradually up to a surface speed of several thousand feet a minute. When this high speed is attained, masses of rock weighing several tons in one or more pieces are dumped into a hopper which guides them into the gap between the rapidly revolving rolls. The effect is to partially arrest the swift motion of the rolls instantaneously, and thereby develop and expend an enormous amount of kinetic energy, which with pile-driver effect cracks the rocks and breaks them into pieces small enough to pass through the fourteen-inch gap. As the power is applied to the rolls through slipping friction-clutches, the speed of the driving-pulleys is not materially reduced; hence the rolls may again be quickly speeded up to their highest velocity while another load of rock is being hoisted in position to be dumped into the hopper. It will be obvious from the foregoing that if it were attempted to supply the great energy necessary for this operation by direct application of steam-power, an engine of enormous horse-power would be required, and even then it is doubtful if one could be constructed of sufficient strength to withstand the terrific strains that would ensue. But the work is done by the great momentum and kinetic energy obtained by speeding up these tremendous masses of metal, and then suddenly opposing their progress, the engine being relieved of all strain through the medium of the slipping friction-clutches. Thus, this cyclopean operation may be continuously conducted with an amount of power prodigiously inferior, in proportion, to the results accomplished.
In practice, a small amount of power is used to gradually speed up the giant rolls to a surface speed of several thousand feet per minute. Once this high speed is reached, large masses of rock weighing several tons, either in one piece or more, are dumped into a hopper that directs them into the gap between the rapidly spinning rolls. The effect is that the fast motion of the rolls is partially stopped instantly, creating and using a massive amount of kinetic energy that, like a pile driver, cracks the rocks and breaks them into pieces small enough to fit through the fourteen-inch gap. As power is applied to the rolls via slipping friction clutches, the speed of the driving pulleys is not significantly reduced; therefore, the rolls can quickly be sped up to their highest velocity again while another load of rock is lifted into position to be dumped into the hopper. It’s clear from the above that if one attempted to supply the great energy needed for this operation by directly applying steam power, a massive engine would be required, and even then it would be questionable if one could be built strong enough to withstand the intense forces that would result. However, the work is accomplished by the significant momentum and kinetic energy gained from accelerating these huge metal masses and then suddenly stopping their movement, with the engine relieved of all strain through the slipping friction clutches. This way, this colossal operation can be conducted continuously with a power requirement that is vastly lower in comparison to the results achieved.
The sketch (Fig. 4) showing a large boulder being dumped into the hopper, or roll-pit, will serve to illustrate the method of feeding these great masses of rock to the rolls, and will also enable the reader to form an idea of the rapidity of the breaking operation, when it is stated that a boulder of the size represented would be reduced by the giant rolls to pieces a trifle larger than a man's head in a few seconds.
The sketch (Fig. 4) showing a large boulder being dropped into the hopper, or roll-pit, illustrates how these huge masses of rock are fed to the rolls. It also helps the reader understand how quickly the breaking process happens, considering that a boulder of that size would be reduced by the giant rolls to pieces just a bit larger than a man's head in just a few seconds.
After leaving the giant rolls the broken rock passed on through other crushing-rolls of somewhat similar construction. These also were invented by Edison, but antedated those previously described; being covered by Patent No. 567,187, issued September 8, 1896. These rolls were intended for the reducing of "one-man-size" rocks to small pieces, which at the time of their original inception was about the standard size of similar machines. At the Edison concentrating plant the broken rock, after passing through these rolls, was further reduced in size by other rolls, and was then ready to be crushed to a fine powder through the medium of another remarkable machine devised by Edison to meet his ever-recurring and well-defined ideas of the utmost economy and efficiency.
After passing through the large rolls, the broken rock went through other crushing rolls of a similar design. These were also invented by Edison, but were created earlier than the ones described before; they were covered by Patent No. 567,187, issued on September 8, 1896. These rolls were designed to reduce "one-man-size" rocks into smaller pieces, which at the time were about the standard size of similar machines. At the Edison concentrating plant, after passing through these rolls, the broken rock was further reduced in size by additional rolls, and was then ready to be crushed into a fine powder using another impressive machine created by Edison, aimed at achieving his consistent vision of maximum economy and efficiency.
NOTE.—Figs. 3 and 4 are reproduced from similar sketches on pages 84 and 85 of McClure's Magazine for November, 1897, by permission of S. S. McClure Co.
NOTE.—Figs. 3 and 4 are reproduced from similar sketches on pages 84 and 85 of McClure's Magazine for November, 1897, by permission of S. S. McClure Co.
The best fine grinding-machines that it was then possible to obtain were so inefficient as to involve a loss of 82 per cent. of the power applied. The thought of such an enormous loss was unbearable, and he did not rest until he had invented and put into use an entirely new grinding-machine, which was called the "three-high" rolls. The device was covered by a patent issued to him on November 21, 1899, No. 637,327. It was a most noteworthy invention, for it brought into the art not only a greater efficiency of grinding than had ever been dreamed of before, but also a tremendous economy by the saving of power; for whereas the previous efficiency had been 18 per cent. and the loss 82 per cent., Edison reversed these figures, and in his three-high rolls produced a working efficiency of 84 per cent., thus reducing the loss of power by friction to 16 per cent. A diagrammatic sketch of this remarkable machine is shown in Fig. 5, which shows a front elevation with the casings, hopper, etc., removed, and also shows above the rolls the rope and pulleys, the supports for which are also removed for the sake of clearness in the illustration.
The best fine grinding machines available at the time were so inefficient that they wasted 82 percent of the power used. The thought of such a massive waste was unbearable, and he didn’t rest until he had invented and implemented a completely new grinding machine, known as the "three-high" rolls. He received a patent for this device on November 21, 1899, No. 637,327. It was a significant invention, as it introduced not only greater grinding efficiency than ever imagined but also substantial savings in power; while the previous efficiency was 18 percent with an 82 percent loss, Edison flipped these numbers, achieving a working efficiency of 84 percent and reducing power loss from friction to just 16 percent. A diagrammatic sketch of this remarkable machine is shown in Fig. 5, which presents a front view with the casings, hopper, etc., removed, and also illustrates the rope and pulleys above the rolls, with their supports also removed for clarity in the illustration.
For the convenience of the reader, in referring to Fig. 5, we will repeat the description of the three-high rolls, which is given on pages 487 and 488 of the preceding narrative.
For the reader's convenience, when referring to Fig. 5, we will repeat the description of the three-high rolls, which is provided on pages 487 and 488 of the previous narrative.
In the two end-pieces of a heavy iron frame were set three rolls, or cylinders—one in the centre, another below, and the other above—all three being in a vertical line. These rolls were about three feet in diameter, made of cast-iron, and had face-plates of chilled-iron. [31] The lowest roll was set in a fixed bearing at the bottom of the frame, and, therefore, could only turn around on its axis. The middle and top rolls were free to move up or down from and toward the lower roll, and the shafts of the middle and upper rolls were set in a loose bearing which could slip up and down in the iron frame. It will be apparent, therefore, that any material which passed in between the top and the middle rolls, and the middle and bottom rolls, could be ground as fine as might be desired, depending entirely upon the amount of pressure applied to the loose rolls. In operation the material passed first through the upper and middle rolls, and then between the middle and lowest rolls.
In the two end sections of a heavy iron frame, three rolls or cylinders were placed—one in the center, another below, and the last one above—all aligned vertically. These rolls were about three feet in diameter, made of cast iron, with face plates made of chilled iron. The lowest roll was fixed at the bottom of the frame and could only rotate on its axis. The middle and top rolls were able to move up and down relative to the lower roll, and their shafts were set in a loose bearing that could slide up and down within the iron frame. This meant that any material passing between the top and middle rolls, and between the middle and bottom rolls, could be ground as fine as desired, depending on the amount of pressure applied to the loose rolls. In operation, the material first went through the upper and middle rolls, and then between the middle and lowest rolls.
[Footnote 31: The faces of these rolls were smooth, but as three-high rolls came into use later in Edison's Portland cement operations the faces were corrugated so as to fit into each other, gear-fashion, to provide for a high rate of feed]
[Footnote 31: The surfaces of these rolls were smooth, but as three-high rolls started being used later in Edison's Portland cement operations, the surfaces were made corrugated to interlock like gears, allowing for a high feed rate]
This pressure was applied in a most ingenious manner. On the ends of the shafts of the bottom and top rolls there were cylindrical sleeves, or bearings, having seven sheaves in which was run a half-inch endless wire rope. This rope was wound seven times over the sheaves as above, and led upward and over a single-groove sheave, which was operated by the piston of an air-cylinder, and in this manner the pressure was applied to the rolls. It will be seen, therefore that the system consisted in a single rope passed over sheaves and so arranged that it could be varied in length, thus providing for elasticity in exerting pressure and regulating it as desired. The efficiency of this system was incomparably greater than that of any other known crusher or grinder, for while a pressure of one hundred and twenty-five thousand pounds could be exerted by these rolls, friction was almost entirely eliminated, because the upper and lower roll bearings turned with the rolls and revolved in the wire rope, which constituted the bearing proper.
This pressure was applied in a really clever way. At the ends of the shafts of the bottom and top rolls, there were cylindrical sleeves, or bearings, with seven sheaves where a half-inch endless wire rope was threaded. This rope was wound seven times around the sheaves mentioned earlier and ran upward over a single-groove sheave, which was operated by the piston of an air cylinder. This setup applied pressure to the rolls. So, the system consisted of a single rope passing over sheaves, arranged to be adjustable in length, allowing for flexibility in applying and regulating pressure as needed. The efficiency of this system was far superior to any other crusher or grinder known at the time, as these rolls could exert a pressure of one hundred and twenty-five thousand pounds, while almost completely eliminating friction. This was because the upper and lower roll bearings rotated with the rolls and moved within the wire rope, which served as the main bearing.
Several other important patents have been issued to Edison for crushing and grinding rolls, some of them being for elaborations and improvements of those above described but all covering methods of greater economy and effectiveness in rock-grinding.
Several other important patents have been granted to Edison for crushing and grinding rolls, some of which are for enhancements and improvements of those mentioned above, but all focused on methods that are more economical and effective in rock grinding.
Edison's work on conveyors during the period of his ore-concentrating labors was distinctively original, ingenious and far in advance of the times. His conception of the concentrating problem was broad and embraced an entire system, of which a principal item was the continuous transfer of enormous quantities of material from place to place at the lowest possible cost. As he contemplated the concentration of six thousand tons daily, the expense of manual labor to move such an immense quantity of rock, sand, and ore would be absolutely prohibitive. Hence, it became necessary to invent a system of conveyors that would be capable of transferring this mass of material from one place to another. And not only must these conveyors be capable of carrying the material, but they must also be devised so that they would automatically receive and discharge their respective loads at appointed places. Edison's ingenuity, engineering ability, and inventive skill were equal to the task, however, and were displayed in a system and variety of conveyors that in practice seemed to act with almost human discrimination. When fully installed throughout the plant, they automatically transferred daily a mass of material equal to about one hundred thousand cubic feet, from mill to mill, covering about a mile in the transit. Up and down, winding in and out, turning corners, delivering material from one to another, making a number of loops in the drying-oven, filling up bins and passing on to the next when they were full, these conveyors in automatic action seemingly played their part with human intelligence, which was in reality the reflection of the intelligence and ingenuity that had originally devised them and set them in motion.
Edison's work on conveyors during his ore-concentrating efforts was uniquely original, clever, and well ahead of its time. His view of the concentration problem was comprehensive and included an entire system, where a key component was the continuous movement of large amounts of material from one place to another at the lowest possible cost. Considering the need to concentrate six thousand tons daily, the cost of manual labor to move such a massive amount of rock, sand, and ore would be prohibitively expensive. Therefore, it was necessary to create a system of conveyors that could transport this bulk of material efficiently. Not only did these conveyors need to carry the material, but they also had to be designed to automatically take in and release their loads at designated points. Edison's creativity, engineering skills, and inventiveness met this challenge, resulting in a diverse system of conveyors that operated with almost human-like precision. Once fully integrated throughout the plant, they automatically moved around a volume of material equivalent to about one hundred thousand cubic feet daily, spanning roughly a mile in the process. They navigated up and down, winding in and out, turning corners, transferring material from one conveyor to another, looping through the drying-oven, filling bins and passing on to the next when they were full. In their automated operation, these conveyors seemed to function with human intelligence, which was really a reflection of the brilliance and ingenuity that originally designed and activated them.
Six of Edison's patents on conveyors include a variety of devices that have since came into broad general use for similar work, and have been the means of effecting great economies in numerous industries of widely varying kinds. Interesting as they are, however, we shall not attempt to describe them in detail, as the space required would be too great. They are specified in the list of patents following this Appendix, and may be examined in detail by any interested student.
Six of Edison's patents on conveyors include various devices that have since become widely used for similar tasks and have led to significant cost savings in many different industries. While they are interesting, we won't go into detail about them, as that would take up too much space. They are listed in the patent list following this Appendix and can be examined in detail by any interested student.
In the same list will also be found a large number of Edison's patents on apparatus and methods of screening, drying, mixing, and briquetting, as well as for dust-proof bearings, and various types and groupings of separators, all of which were called forth by the exigencies and magnitude of his great undertaking, and without which he could not possibly have attained the successful physical results that crowned his labors. Edison's persistence in reducing the cost of his operations is noteworthy in connection with his screening and drying inventions, in which the utmost advantage is taken of the law of gravitation. With its assistance, which cost nothing, these operations were performed perfectly. It was only necessary to deliver the material at the top of the chambers, and during its natural descent it was screened or dried as the case might be.
In the same list, you will also find a large number of Edison's patents on devices and methods for screening, drying, mixing, and briquetting, as well as for dust-proof bearings and various types of separators. All of these innovations were driven by the demands and scale of his massive project, and without them, he could not have achieved the successful physical outcomes that marked his work. Edison's determination to lower his operational costs is significant in relation to his inventions for screening and drying, where he maximized the benefits of gravity. With its help, which came at no cost, these processes were carried out flawlessly. It was only necessary to drop the material at the top of the chambers, and during its natural descent, it was either screened or dried as needed.
All these inventions and devices, as well as those described in detail above (except magnetic separators and mixing and briquetting machines), are being used by him to-day in the manufacture of Portland cement, as that industry presents many of the identical problems which presented themselves in relation to the concentration of iron ore.
All these inventions and devices, along with the ones detailed above (except for magnetic separators and mixing and briquetting machines), are being used by him today in the production of Portland cement, as that industry faces many of the same challenges that arose with the concentration of iron ore.
XVII. THE LONG CEMENT KILN
IN this remarkable invention, which has brought about a striking innovation in a long-established business, we see another characteristic instance of Edison's incisive reasoning and boldness of conception carried into practical effect in face of universal opinions to the contrary.
In this groundbreaking invention, which has introduced a significant change to a long-standing industry, we observe another example of Edison's sharp thinking and daring ideas put into action despite widespread opposition.
For the information of those unacquainted with the process of manufacturing Portland cement, it may be stated that the material consists preliminarily of an intimate mixture of cement rock and limestone, ground to a very fine powder. This powder is technically known in the trade as "chalk," and is fed into rotary kilns and "burned"; that is to say, it is subjected to a high degree of heat obtained by the combustion of pulverized coal, which is injected into the interior of the kiln. This combustion effects a chemical decomposition of the chalk, and causes it to assume a plastic consistency and to collect together in the form of small spherical balls, which are known as "clinker." Kilns are usually arranged with a slight incline, at the upper end of which the chalk is fed in and gradually works its way down to the interior flame of burning fuel at the other end. When it arrives at the lower end, the material has been "burned," and the clinker drops out into a receiving chamber below. The operation is continuous, a constant supply of chalk passing in at one end of the kiln and a continuous dribble of clinker-balls dropping out at the other. After cooling, the clinker is ground into very fine powder, which is the Portland cement of commerce.
For those who aren't familiar with how Portland cement is made, it starts with a close mixture of cement rock and limestone, which is ground into a very fine powder. This powder is commonly referred to in the industry as "chalk," and it's fed into rotary kilns where it's "burned." This means it undergoes a high level of heat generated by burning pulverized coal, which is blown into the kiln. This burning causes a chemical breakdown of the chalk, making it plastic-like and forming small spherical balls known as "clinker." The kilns are typically set up with a slight incline, where the chalk is added at the top and gradually moves down to the flames at the bottom. By the time it reaches the lower end, the material is "burned," and the clinker falls into a chamber below. This process runs continuously, with a steady flow of chalk entering one end and clinker balls constantly dropping out the other. After it cools down, the clinker is ground into a very fine powder, which is the Portland cement sold commercially.
It is self-evident that an ideal kiln would be one that produced the maximum quantity of thoroughly clinkered material with a minimum amount of fuel, labor, and investment. When Edison was preparing to go into the cement business, he looked the ground over thoroughly, and, after considerable investigation and experiment, came to the conclusion that prevailing conditions as to kilns were far from ideal.
It’s clear that the perfect kiln would produce the most fully clinkered material using the least amount of fuel, labor, and investment. When Edison was getting ready to enter the cement industry, he carefully assessed the situation and, after extensive research and experimentation, concluded that the existing conditions regarding kilns were far from ideal.
The standard kilns then in use were about sixty feet in length, with an internal diameter of about five feet. In all rotary kilns for burning cement, the true clinkering operation takes place only within a limited portion of their total length, where the heat is greatest; hence the interior of the kiln may be considered as being divided longitudinally into two parts or zones—namely, the combustion, or clinkering, zone, and the zone of oncoming raw material. In the sixty-foot kiln the length of the combustion zone was about ten feet, extending from a point six or eight feet from the lower, or discharge, end to a point about eighteen feet from that end. Consequently, beyond that point there was a zone of only about forty feet, through which the heated gases passed and came in contact with the oncoming material, which was in movement down toward the clinkering zone. Since the bulk of oncoming material was small, the gases were not called upon to part with much of their heat, and therefore passed on up the stack at very high temperatures, ranging from 1500 degrees to 1800 degrees Fahr. Obviously, this heat was entirely lost.
The standard kilns used at the time were about sixty feet long and had an internal diameter of around five feet. In all rotary kilns for burning cement, the actual clinkering process occurs only in a specific section of their total length, where the heat is highest. Therefore, the inside of the kiln can be seen as divided into two sections or zones: the combustion, or clinkering, zone, and the zone where raw material enters. In the sixty-foot kiln, the combustion zone was approximately ten feet long, starting about six or eight feet from the lower, or discharge, end and extending to around eighteen feet from that end. As a result, the remaining section was roughly forty feet long, through which the heated gases flowed and interacted with the incoming material, which was moving down toward the clinkering zone. Since most of the incoming material was small, the gases didn’t have to give up much of their heat, and thus they exited the stack at very high temperatures, ranging from 1500 to 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. Clearly, this heat was completely wasted.
An additional loss of efficiency arose from the fact that the material moved so rapidly toward the combustion zone that it had not given up all its carbon dioxide on reaching there; and by the giving off of large quantities of that gas within the combustion zone, perfect and economical combustion of coal could not be effected.
An extra loss of efficiency happened because the material moved so quickly to the combustion zone that it hadn’t released all its carbon dioxide by the time it got there. The release of large amounts of that gas in the combustion zone prevented perfect and efficient combustion of coal.
The comparatively short length of the sixty-foot kiln not only limited the amount of material that could be fed into it, but the limitation in length of the combustion zone militated against a thorough clinkering of the material, this operation being one in which the elements of time and proper heat are prime considerations. Thus the quantity of good clinker obtainable was unfavorably affected. By reason of these and other limitations and losses, it had been possible, in practice, to obtain only about two hundred and fifty barrels of clinker per day of twenty-four hours; and that with an expenditure for coal proportionately equal to about 29 to 33 per cent. of the quantity of clinker produced, even assuming that all the clinker was of good quality.
The relatively short length of the sixty-foot kiln not only restricted the amount of material that could be fed into it, but the limited length of the combustion zone also hindered a complete clinkering of the material, which relies heavily on time and appropriate heat. As a result, the amount of quality clinker produced was negatively impacted. Because of these and other limitations and losses, it was practically possible to produce only about two hundred and fifty barrels of clinker per day over a twenty-four hour period; and this was with a coal expenditure that was roughly equal to about 29 to 33 percent of the clinker produced, even if we assumed that all the clinker was of good quality.
Edison realized that the secret of greater commercial efficiency and improvement of quality lay in the ability to handle larger quantities of material within a given time, and to produce a more perfect product without increasing cost or investment in proportion. His reasoning led him to the conclusion that this result could only be obtained through the use of a kiln of comparatively great length, and his investigations and experiments enabled him to decide upon a length of one hundred and fifty feet, but with an increase in diameter of only six inches to a foot over that of the sixty-foot kiln.
Edison understood that the key to greater commercial efficiency and improved quality was the ability to manage larger amounts of material in a set amount of time and to create a better product without significantly raising costs or investments. His thought process led him to the conclusion that this could only be achieved by using a kiln that was comparatively longer, and through his research and experiments, he determined that a length of one hundred and fifty feet would be ideal, with only a six-inch increase in diameter compared to the sixty-foot kiln.
The principal considerations that influenced Edison in making this radical innovation may be briefly stated as follows:
The main factors that influenced Edison in making this significant innovation can be summarized as follows:
First. The ability to maintain in the kiln a load from five to seven times greater than ordinarily employed, thereby tending to a more economical output.
First. The ability to keep a load in the kiln that is five to seven times larger than what is usually used, which leads to a more cost-effective output.
Second. The combustion of a vastly increased bulk of pulverized coal and a greatly enlarged combustion zone, extending about forty feet longitudinally into the kiln—thus providing an area within which the material might be maintained in a clinkering temperature for a sufficiently long period to insure its being thoroughly clinkered from periphery to centre.
Second. The burning of a significantly larger amount of pulverized coal and a much bigger combustion zone, extending about forty feet along the kiln—this creates an area where the material can stay at clinkering temperature long enough to ensure it is completely clinkered from the outside to the inside.
Third. By reason of such a greatly extended length of the zone of oncoming material (and consequently much greater bulk), the gases and other products of combustion would be cooled sufficiently between the combustion zone and the stack so as to leave the kiln at a comparatively low temperature. Besides, the oncoming material would thus be gradually raised in temperature instead of being heated abruptly, as in the shorter kilns.
Third. Because of the significantly longer length of the incoming material zone (and therefore a much larger volume), the gases and other combustion products would cool enough between the combustion zone and the stack to exit the kiln at a relatively low temperature. Additionally, the incoming material would be gradually heated instead of getting an abrupt temperature increase, as happens in shorter kilns.
Fourth. The material having thus been greatly raised in temperature before reaching the combustion zone would have parted with substantially all its carbon dioxide, and therefore would not introduce into the combustion zone sufficient of that gas to disturb the perfect character of the combustion.
Fourth. The material, having been significantly heated before reaching the combustion zone, would have released nearly all its carbon dioxide and therefore would not bring enough of that gas into the combustion zone to disrupt the quality of the combustion.
Fifth. On account of the great weight of the heavy load in a long kiln, there would result the formation of a continuous plastic coating on that portion of the inner surface of the kiln where temperatures are highest. This would effectively protect the fire-brick lining from the destructive effects of the heat.
Fifth. Because of the significant weight of the heavy load in a long kiln, a continuous plastic coating would form on the part of the kiln's inner surface where temperatures are highest. This would effectively shield the fire-brick lining from the damaging effects of the heat.
Such, in brief, were the essential principles upon which Edison based his conception and invention of the long kiln, which has since become so well known in the cement business.
Those were the key principles that Edison used to develop his idea and invention of the long kiln, which has since become widely recognized in the cement industry.
Many other considerations of a minor and mechanical nature, but which were important factors in his solution of this difficult problem, are worthy of study by those intimately associated with or interested in the art. Not the least of the mechanical questions was settled by Edison's decision to make this tremendously long kiln in sections of cast-iron, with flanges, bolted together, and supported on rollers rotated by electric motors. Longitudinal expansion and thrust were also important factors to be provided for, as well as special devices to prevent the packing of the mass of material as it passed in and out of the kiln. Special provision was also made for injecting streams of pulverized coal in such manner as to create the largely extended zone of combustion. As to the details of these and many other ingenious devices, we must refer the curious reader to the patents, as it is merely intended in these pages to indicate in a brief manner the main principles of Edison's notable inventions. The principal United States patent on the long kiln was issued October 24, 1905, No. 802,631.
Many other minor and practical considerations, which were key factors in solving this challenging problem, are worth studying for those closely involved with or interested in the field. One significant mechanical question was resolved by Edison's choice to construct this extremely long kiln in sections of cast iron, featuring flanges that are bolted together and supported on rollers powered by electric motors. Longitudinal expansion and thrust were also important factors to account for, along with special devices to prevent the mass of material from getting jammed as it moved in and out of the kiln. Additionally, arrangements were made for injecting streams of pulverized coal in a way that creates a much larger combustion zone. For the specifics of these and many other clever devices, we direct the curious reader to the patents, as this text only aims to briefly highlight the main principles of Edison's remarkable inventions. The main United States patent for the long kiln was issued on October 24, 1905, No. 802,631.
That his reasonings and deductions were correct in this case have been indubitably proven by some years of experience with the long kiln in its ability to produce from eight hundred to one thousand barrels of good clinker every twenty-four hours, with an expenditure for coal proportionately equal to about only 20 per cent. of the quantity of clinker produced.
That his reasoning and conclusions were right in this case have been clearly proven by several years of experience with the long kiln, which can produce between 800 and 1,000 barrels of good clinker every 24 hours, using only about 20 percent of the coal compared to the amount of clinker produced.
To illustrate the long cement kiln by diagram would convey but little to the lay mind, and we therefore present an illustration (Fig. 1) of actual kilns in perspective, from which sense of their proportions may be gathered.
To show the long cement kiln with a diagram wouldn’t mean much to someone unfamiliar with it, so we're providing an illustration (Fig. 1) of real kilns in perspective, from which their proportions can be understood.
XVIII. EDISON'S NEW STORAGE BATTERY
GENERICALLY considered, a "battery" is a device which generates electric current. There are two distinct species of battery, one being known as "primary," and the other as "storage," although the latter is sometimes referred to as a "secondary battery" or "accumulator." Every type of each of these two species is essentially alike in its general make-up; that is to say, every cell of battery of any kind contains at least two elements of different nature immersed in a more or less liquid electrolyte of chemical character. On closing the circuit of a primary battery an electric current is generated by reason of the chemical action which is set up between the electrolyte and the elements. This involves a gradual consumption of one of the elements and a corresponding exhaustion of the active properties of the electrolyte. By reason of this, both the element and the electrolyte that have been used up must be renewed from time to time, in order to obtain a continued supply of electric current.
In general terms, a "battery" is a device that generates electric current. There are two main types of batteries: "primary" and "storage," with the latter sometimes called a "secondary battery" or "accumulator." Every type of these two categories is fundamentally similar in its basic structure; specifically, every battery cell contains at least two different elements immersed in a liquid electrolyte of a chemical nature. When the circuit of a primary battery is closed, an electric current is produced due to the chemical reaction between the electrolyte and the elements. This process gradually consumes one of the elements and depletes the active properties of the electrolyte. As a result, both the used element and the exhausted electrolyte need to be replaced periodically to maintain a continuous supply of electric current.
The storage battery also generates electric current through chemical action, but without involving the constant repriming with active materials to replace those consumed and exhausted as above mentioned. The term "storage," as applied to this species of battery, is, however, a misnomer, and has been the cause of much misunderstanding to nontechnical persons. To the lay mind a "storage" battery presents itself in the aspect of a device in which electric energy is STORED, just as compressed air is stored or accumulated in a tank. This view, however, is not in accordance with facts. It is exactly like the primary battery in the fundamental circumstance that its ability for generating electric current depends upon chemical action. In strict terminology it is a "reversible" battery, as will be quite obvious if we glance briefly at its philosophy. When a storage battery is "charged," by having an electric current passed through it, the electric energy produces a chemical effect, adding oxygen to the positive plate, and taking oxygen away from the negative plate. Thus, the positive plate becomes oxidized, and the negative plate reduced. After the charging operation is concluded the battery is ready for use, and upon its circuit being closed through a translating device, such as a lamp or motor, a reversion ("discharge") takes place, the positive plate giving up its oxygen, and the negative plate being oxidized. These chemical actions result in the generation of an electric current as in a primary battery. As a matter of fact, the chemical actions and reactions in a storage battery are much more complex, but the above will serve to afford the lay reader a rather simple idea of the general result arrived at through the chemical activity referred to.
The storage battery generates electric current through chemical reactions, but it doesn’t require the constant replenishing of active materials like those that are consumed and used up, as mentioned above. The term "storage," when talking about this type of battery, is actually misleading and has caused a lot of confusion for non-technical people. To someone unfamiliar with the details, a "storage" battery seems like a device where electric energy is STORED, similar to how compressed air is accumulated in a tank. However, this view doesn’t reflect reality. It functions like a primary battery in the key way that its ability to generate electric current relies on chemical reactions. In more precise terms, it is a "reversible" battery, which becomes clear when we briefly consider how it works. When a storage battery is "charged" by passing an electric current through it, the electric energy creates a chemical effect, adding oxygen to the positive plate and removing oxygen from the negative plate. As a result, the positive plate gets oxidized, while the negative plate is reduced. After charging is complete, the battery is ready for use, and when the circuit is connected to a device like a lamp or motor, a reversal ("discharge") occurs, with the positive plate releasing its oxygen and the negative plate becoming oxidized. These chemical reactions generate electric current, much like in a primary battery. In reality, the chemical processes in a storage battery are much more intricate, but this explanation should give the general reader a basic understanding of the overall outcome of the described chemical activity.
The storage battery, as a commercial article, was introduced into the market in the year 1881. At that time, and all through the succeeding years, until about 1905, there was only one type that was recognized as commercially practicable—namely, that known as the lead-sulphuric-acid cell, consisting of lead plates immersed in an electrolyte of dilute sulphuric acid. In the year last named Edison first brought out his new form of nickel-iron cell with alkaline electrolyte, as we have related in the preceding narrative. Early in the eighties, at Menlo Park, he had given much thought to the lead type of storage battery, and during the course of three years had made a prodigious number of experiments in the direction of improving it, probably performing more experiments in that time than the aggregate of those of all other investigators. Even in those early days he arrived at the conclusion that the lead-sulphuric-acid combination was intrinsically wrong, and did not embrace the elements of a permanent commercial device. He did not at that time, however, engage in a serious search for another form of storage battery, being tremendously occupied with his lighting system and other matters.
The storage battery, as a commercial product, was introduced to the market in 1881. At that time, and for many years afterward until about 1905, there was only one type that was considered commercially viable—the lead-acid cell, made of lead plates submerged in a dilute sulfuric acid electrolyte. In 1905, Edison first launched his new nickel-iron cell with an alkaline electrolyte, as we mentioned in the previous narrative. In the early 1880s, at Menlo Park, he spent a lot of time thinking about the lead type of storage battery and over three years conducted a massive number of experiments to improve it, likely more than all other researchers combined. Even back then, he concluded that the lead-sulfuric-acid combination was fundamentally flawed and didn’t have the components for a lasting commercial solution. However, he wasn’t actively looking for another type of storage battery at that time because he was heavily focused on his lighting system and other projects.
It may here be noted, for the information of the lay reader, that the lead-acid type of storage battery consists of two or more lead plates immersed in dilute sulphuric acid and contained in a receptacle of glass, hard rubber, or other special material not acted upon by acid. The plates are prepared and "formed" in various ways, and the chemical actions are similar to those above stated, the positive plate being oxidized and the negative reduced during "charge," and reversed during "discharge." This type of cell, however, has many serious disadvantages inherent to its very nature. We will name a few of them briefly. Constant dropping of fine particles of active material often causes short-circuiting of the plates, and always necessitates occasional washing out of cells; deterioration through "sulphation" if discharge is continued too far or if recharging is not commenced quickly enough; destruction of adjacent metalwork by the corrosive fumes given out during charge and discharge; the tendency of lead plates to "buckle" under certain conditions; the limitation to the use of glass, hard rubber, or similar containers on account of the action of the acid; and the immense weight for electrical capacity. The tremendously complex nature of the chemical reactions which take place in the lead-acid storage battery also renders it an easy prey to many troublesome diseases.
It's worth noting, for the average reader, that the lead-acid type of storage battery consists of two or more lead plates submerged in a diluted sulfuric acid solution, housed in a container made of glass, hard rubber, or another specific material that isn't affected by acid. The plates are prepared and "formed" in different ways, with the chemical processes being similar to those described earlier, where the positive plate is oxidized and the negative is reduced during charging, and this reverses during discharging. However, this type of cell has several serious disadvantages due to its very nature. Here are a few: Fine particles of active material often fall off, leading to short-circuiting of the plates and requiring occasional cleaning of the cells; there is deterioration from "sulfation" if discharge goes too far or if recharging isn't started soon enough; the corrosive fumes released during charging and discharging can damage nearby metal parts; the lead plates can "buckle" under certain conditions; the use of glass, hard rubber, or similar containers is limited because of the acid's action; and the heavy weight relative to electrical capacity. The highly complex chemical reactions that occur in the lead-acid storage battery also make it susceptible to many troublesome issues.
In the year 1900, when Edison undertook to invent a storage battery, he declared it should be a new type into which neither sulphuric nor any other acid should enter. He said that the intimate and continued companionship of an acid and a metal was unnatural, and incompatible with the idea of durability and simplicity. He furthermore stated that lead was an unmechanical metal for a battery, being heavy and lacking stability and elasticity, and that as most metals were unaffected by alkaline solutions, he was going to experiment in that direction. The soundness of his reasoning is amply justified by the perfection of results obtained in the new type of storage battery bearing his name, and now to be described.
In 1900, when Edison set out to invent a storage battery, he declared it would be a new kind that didn’t contain sulfuric or any other acid. He argued that the close and ongoing relationship between an acid and a metal was unnatural and not suited for durability and simplicity. He also mentioned that lead was an unsuitable metal for a battery because it was heavy and lacked stability and elasticity. Since most metals were not affected by alkaline solutions, he planned to experiment in that area. The validity of his reasoning is clearly demonstrated by the impressive results of the new type of storage battery named after him, which will now be described.
The essential technical details of this battery are fully described in an article written by one of Edison's laboratory staff, Walter E. Holland, who for many years has been closely identified with the inventor's work on this cell The article was published in the Electrical World, New York, April 28, 1910; and the following extracts therefrom will afford an intelligent comprehension of this invention:
The key technical details of this battery are thoroughly explained in an article by Walter E. Holland, a member of Edison's lab team who has been closely involved with the inventor's work on this cell for many years. The article was published in Electrical World, New York, on April 28, 1910; and the following extracts will provide a clear understanding of this invention:
"The 'A' type Edison cell is the outcome of nine years of costly experimentation and persistent toil on the part of its inventor and his associates....
The 'A' type Edison cell is the result of nine years of expensive experimentation and hard work by its inventor and his team....
"The Edison invention involves the use of an entirely new voltaic combination in an alkaline electrolyte, in place of the lead-lead-peroxide combination and acid electrolyte, characteristic of all other commercial storage batteries. Experience has proven that this not only secures durability and greater output per unit-weight of battery, but in addition there is eliminated a long list of troubles and diseases inherent in the lead-acid combination....
"The Edison invention uses a completely new battery setup with an alkaline electrolyte instead of the usual lead-lead-peroxide setup and acid electrolyte found in other commercial storage batteries. Experience has shown that this not only ensures durability and a greater output for each unit of battery weight but also eliminates a long list of problems and issues common to the lead-acid batteries..."
"The principle on which the action of this new battery is based is the oxidation and reduction of metals in an electrolyte which does not combine with, and will not dissolve, either the metals or their oxides; and an electrolyte, furthermore, which, although decomposed by the action of the battery, is immediately re-formed in equal quantity; and therefore in effect is a CONSTANT element, not changing in density or in conductivity.
"The principle behind how this new battery works is the oxidation and reduction of metals in an electrolyte that does not react with or dissolve either the metals or their oxides. Additionally, this electrolyte, although broken down by the battery's action, is immediately replenished in equal amounts; thus, it functions as a CONSTANT element, maintaining its density and conductivity."
"A battery embodying this basic principle will have features of great value where lightness and durability are desiderata. For instance, the electrolyte, being a constant factor, as explained, is not required in any fixed and large amount, as is the case with sulphuric acid in the lead battery; thus the cell may be designed with minimum distancing of plates and with the greatest economy of space that is consistent with safe insulation and good mechanical design. Again, the active materials of the electrodes being insoluble in, and absolutely unaffected by, the electrolyte, are not liable to any sort of chemical deterioration by action of the electrolyte—no matter how long continued....
A battery based on this fundamental principle will have highly valuable features when lightness and durability are desired. For example, since the electrolyte is a constant factor, as previously explained, it doesn’t need to be in a large fixed amount like the sulphuric acid in a lead battery. This allows the cell to be designed with minimal spacing between the plates and the most efficient use of space compatible with safe insulation and solid mechanical design. Additionally, since the active materials in the electrodes are insoluble and completely unaffected by the electrolyte, they aren’t subject to any kind of chemical degradation due to the electrolyte, regardless of how long it lasts.
"The electrolyte of the Edison battery is a 21 per cent. solution of potassium hydrate having, in addition, a small amount of lithium hydrate. The active metals of the electrodes—which will oxidize and reduce in this electrolyte without dissolution or chemical deterioration—are nickel and iron. These active elements are not put in the plates AS METALS; but one, nickel, in the form of a hydrate, and the other, iron, as an oxide.
The electrolyte of the Edison battery is a 21 percent solution of potassium hydroxide, along with a small amount of lithium hydroxide. The active metals in the electrodes—which will oxidize and reduce in this electrolyte without dissolving or deteriorating chemically—are nickel and iron. These active elements are not used in the plates as metals; instead, nickel is in the form of a hydroxide, and iron is in the form of an oxide.
"The containing cases of both kinds of active material (Fig. 1), and their supporting grids (Fig. 2), as well as the bolts, washers, and nuts used in assembling (Fig. 3), and even the retaining can and its cover (Fig. 4), are all made of nickel-plated steel—a material in which lightness, durability and mechanical strength are most happily combined, and a material beyond suspicion as to corrosion in an alkaline electrolyte....
"The cases holding both types of active material (Fig. 1), their support grids (Fig. 2), as well as the bolts, washers, and nuts used for assembly (Fig. 3), and even the retaining can and its lid (Fig. 4), are all made of nickel-plated steel— a material that perfectly combines lightness, durability, and mechanical strength, and is completely reliable regarding corrosion in an alkaline electrolyte...."
"An essential part of Edison's discovery of active masetials for an alkaline storage battery was the PREPARATION of these materials. Metallic powder of iron and nickel, or even oxides of these metals, prepared in the ordinary way, are not chemically active in a sufficient degree to work in a battery. It is only when specially prepared iron oxide of exceeding fineness, and nickel hydrate conforming to certain physical, as well as chemical, standards can be made that the alkaline battery is practicable. Needless to say, the working out of the conditions and processes of manufacture of the materials has involved great ingenuity and endless experimentation."
"An important part of Edison's discovery of active materials for an alkaline storage battery was the preparation of these materials. Metallic powders of iron and nickel, or even their oxides, prepared in the usual way, aren’t chemically active enough to be used in a battery. It’s only when specially prepared iron oxide of extremely fine quality and nickel hydrate that meet certain physical and chemical standards are created that the alkaline battery becomes viable. It's clear that figuring out the conditions and manufacturing processes for these materials required significant creativity and countless experiments."
The article then treats of Edison's investigations into means for supporting and making electrical connection with the active materials, showing some of the difficulties encountered and the various discoveries made in developing the perfected cell, after which the writer continues his description of the "A" type cell, as follows:
The article then discusses Edison's research on ways to support and connect electrically with the active materials, highlighting some of the challenges faced and the various discoveries made in developing the improved cell. After this, the writer continues his description of the "A" type cell, as follows:
"It will be seen at once that the construction of the two kinds of plate is radically different. The negative or iron plate (Fig. 5) has the familiar flat-pocket construction. Each negative contains twenty-four pockets—a pocket being 1/2 inch wide by 3 inches long, and having a maximum thickness of a little more than 1/8 inch. The positive or nickel plate (Fig. 6) is seen to consist of two rows of round rods or pencils, thirty in number, held in a vertical position by a steel support-frame. The pencils have flat flanges at the ends (formed by closing in the metal case), by which they are supported and electrical connection is made. The frame is slit at the inner horizontal edges, and then folded in such a way as to make individual clamping-jaws for each end-flange. The clamping-in is done at great pressure, and the resultant plate has great rigidity and strength.
It’s immediately clear that the construction of the two types of plates is fundamentally different. The negative or iron plate (Fig. 5) features the familiar flat-pocket design. Each negative has twenty-four pockets—each pocket is 1/2 inch wide by 3 inches long, with a maximum thickness of just over 1/8 inch. The positive or nickel plate (Fig. 6) consists of two rows of round rods or pencils, totaling thirty, held vertically by a steel support frame. The pencils have flat flanges at the ends (created by closing the metal case), which provide support and facilitate electrical connections. The frame is slotted at the inner horizontal edges and then folded in a manner that creates individual clamping jaws for each end flange. The clamping is done under high pressure, resulting in a plate that is highly rigid and strong.
"The perforated tubes into which the nickel active material is loaded are made of nickel-plated steel of high quality. They are put together with a double-lapped spiral seam to give expansion-resisting qualities, and as an additional precaution small metal rings are slipped on the outside. Each tube is 1/4 inch in diameter by 4 1/8 inches long, add has eight of the reinforcing rings.
"The perforated tubes that hold the nickel active material are made from high-quality nickel-plated steel. They feature a double-lapped spiral seam for added durability against expansion, and as an extra precaution, small metal rings are placed on the outside. Each tube measures 1/4 inch in diameter and 4 1/8 inches long, and has eight reinforcing rings."
"It will be seen that the 'A' positive plate has been given the theoretically best design to prevent expansion and overcome trouble from that cause. Actual tests, long continued under very severe conditions, have shown that the construction is right, and fulfils the most sanguine expectations."
"It will be clear that the 'A' positive plate has been designed in the best possible way to prevent expansion and address issues arising from that cause. Extended testing under extremely tough conditions has demonstrated that the construction is effective and meets our highest hopes."
Mr. Holland in his article then goes on to explain the development of the nickel flakes as the conducting factor in the positive element, but as this has already been described in Chapter XXII, we shall pass on to a later point, where he says:
Mr. Holland in his article then explains how nickel flakes serve as the conducting factor in the positive element, but since this has already been covered in Chapter XXII, we'll move on to a later point, where he states:
"An idea of the conditions inside a loaded tube can best be had by microscopic examination. Fig. 7 shows a magnified section of a regularly loaded tube which has been sawed lengthwise. The vertical bounding walls are edges of the perforated metal containing tube; the dark horizontal lines are layers of nickel flake, while the light-colored thicker layers represent the nickel hydrate. It should be noted that the layers of flake nickel extend practically unbroken across the tube and make contact with the metal wall at both sides. These metal layers conduct current to or from the active nickel hydrate in all parts of the tube very efficiently. There are about three hundred and fifty layers of each kind of material in a 4 1/8-inch tube, each layer of nickel hydrate being about 0.01 inch thick; so it will be seen that the current does not have to penetrate very far into the nickel hydrate—one-half a layer's thickness being the maximum distance. The perforations of the containing tube, through which the electrolyte reaches the active material, are also shown in Fig. 7."
"To get a clear picture of the conditions inside a loaded tube, you need to look at it under a microscope. Fig. 7 shows a magnified cross-section of a normally loaded tube that has been sliced lengthwise. The vertical walls are the edges of the perforated metal tube, the dark horizontal lines are layers of nickel flake, and the light-colored thicker layers represent the nickel hydrate. It's important to note that the layers of flake nickel stretch almost completely across the tube and touch the metal wall on both sides. These metal layers effectively conduct current to and from the active nickel hydrate throughout the entire tube. In a 4 1/8-inch tube, there are about three hundred and fifty layers of each type of material, with each layer of nickel hydrate being about 0.01 inch thick; therefore, the current doesn't have to travel very far into the nickel hydrate—just half the thickness of a layer at most. The holes in the containing tube, which allow the electrolyte to reach the active material, are also illustrated in Fig. 7."
In conclusion, the article enumerates the chief characteristics of the Edison storage battery which fit it preeminently for transportation service, as follows: 1. No loss of active material, hence no sediment short-circuits. 2. No jar breakage. 3. Possibility of quick disconnection or replacement of any cell without employment of skilled labor. 4. Impossibility of "buckling" and harmlessness of a dead short-circuit. 5. Simplicity of care required. 6. Durability of materials and construction. 7. Impossibility of "sulphation." 8. Entire absence of corrosive fumes. 9. Commercial advantages of light weight. 10. Duration on account of its dependability. 11. Its high practical efficiency.
In conclusion, the article lists the main features of the Edison storage battery that make it ideal for transportation use: 1. No loss of active material, so no sediment short-circuits. 2. No breakage from impact. 3. Quick disconnection or replacement of any cell without needing skilled labor. 4. No risk of "buckling" and safety from a dead short-circuit. 5. Easy maintenance. 6. Durable materials and construction. 7. No risk of "sulphation." 8. No corrosive fumes at all. 9. Commercial benefits from being lightweight. 10. Long-lasting due to its reliability. 11. High practical efficiency.
XIX. EDISON'S POURED CEMENT HOUSE
THE inventions that have been thus far described fall into two classes—first, those that were fundamental in the great arts and industries which have been founded and established upon them, and, second, those that have entered into and enlarged other arts that were previously in existence. On coming to consider the subject now under discussion, however, we find ourselves, at this writing, on the threshold of an entirely new and undeveloped art of such boundless possibilities that its ultimate extent can only be a matter of conjecture.
THE inventions that have been described so far fall into two categories—first, those that are fundamental to the major arts and industries built upon them, and, second, those that have contributed to and expanded existing arts. As we examine the topic at hand, we find ourselves at the beginning of a completely new and unexplored art with limitless possibilities, where its ultimate scope can only be guessed at.
Edison's concrete house, however, involves two main considerations, first of which was the conception or creation of the IDEA—vast and comprehensive—of providing imperishable and sanitary homes for the wage-earner by molding an entire house in one piece in a single operation, so to speak, and so simply that extensive groups of such dwellings could be constructed rapidly and at very reasonable cost. With this idea suggested, one might suppose that it would be a simple matter to make molds and pour in a concrete mixture. Not so, however. And here the second consideration presents itself. An ordinary cement mixture is composed of crushed stone, sand, cement, and water. If such a mixture be poured into deep molds the heavy stone and sand settle to the bottom. Should the mixture be poured into a horizontal mold, like the floor of a house, the stone and sand settle, forming an ununiform mass. It was at this point that invention commenced, in order to produce a concrete mixture which would overcome this crucial difficulty. Edison, with characteristic thoroughness, took up a line of investigation, and after a prolonged series of experiments succeeded in inventing a mixture that upon hardening remained uniform throughout its mass. In the beginning of his experimentation he had made the conditions of test very severe by the construction of forms similar to that shown in the sketch below.
Edison's concrete house involves two main considerations. The first is the idea—vast and comprehensive—of creating durable and sanitary homes for wage-earners by molding entire houses in one single operation. This approach allows for the rapid construction of large groups of such homes at a very reasonable cost. With this idea in mind, one might think it would be easy to make molds and pour in a concrete mixture. Not quite. This brings us to the second consideration. A typical cement mixture includes crushed stone, sand, cement, and water. When poured into deep molds, the heavy stone and sand settle to the bottom. If poured into a horizontal mold, like a house floor, the stone and sand settle unevenly, creating an inconsistent mass. This was the moment when invention began, as a solution was needed to create a concrete mixture that would address this major issue. Edison, known for his thoroughness, embarked on a detailed investigation and, after many experiments, succeeded in developing a mixture that remained uniform throughout its mass once it hardened. At the start of his experimentation, he set very challenging test conditions by constructing forms similar to the sketch below.
This consisted of a hollow wooden form of the dimensions indicated. The mixture was to be poured into the hopper until the entire form was filled, such mixture flowing down and along the horizontal legs and up the vertical members. It was to be left until the mixture was hard, and the requirement of the test was that there should be absolute uniformity of mixture and mass throughout. This was finally accomplished, and further invention then proceeded along engineering lines looking toward the devising of a system of molds with which practicable dwellings might be cast.
This was made up of a hollow wooden mold with the specified dimensions. The mixture was to be poured into the hopper until the entire mold was filled, flowing down the horizontal sections and up the vertical pieces. It was to be left until the mixture hardened, and the test required that the mixture and mass be completely uniform throughout. This was eventually achieved, and further innovation continued along engineering lines aimed at creating a system of molds for casting practical homes.
Edison's boldness and breadth of conception are well illustrated in his idea of a poured house, in which he displays his accustomed tendency to reverse accepted methods. In fact, it is this very reversal of usual procedure that renders it difficult for the average mind to instantly grasp the full significance of the principles involved and the results attained.
Edison's boldness and wide-ranging ideas are clearly shown in his concept of a poured house, where he showcases his usual tendency to turn traditional methods on their head. In fact, it's this very reversal of standard practices that makes it challenging for most people to immediately understand the full meaning of the principles involved and the results achieved.
Up to this time we have been accustomed to see the erection of a house begun at the foundation and built up slowly, piece by piece, of solid materials: first the outer frame, then the floors and inner walls, followed by the stairways, and so on up to the putting on of the roof. Hence, it requires a complete rearrangement of mental conceptions to appreciate Edison's proposal to build a house FROM THE TOP DOWNWARD, in a few hours, with a freely flowing material poured into molds, and in a few days to take away the molds and find a complete indestructible sanitary house, including foundation, frame, floors, walls, stairways, chimneys, sanitary arrangements, and roof, with artistic ornamentation inside and out, all in one solid piece, as if it were graven or bored out of a rock.
Until now, we’ve been used to seeing a house start from the ground up, built slowly, piece by piece, using solid materials: first the outer frame, then the floors and inner walls, followed by the stairs, and finally the roof. Therefore, it takes a complete shift in thinking to understand Edison’s idea of building a house FROM THE TOP DOWN in just a few hours, using a freely flowing material poured into molds. Within a few days, you could remove the molds and find a fully intact, sanitary house, complete with foundation, frame, floors, walls, stairs, chimneys, plumbing, and roof, all beautifully decorated inside and out, as if it were carved out of solid rock.
To bring about the accomplishment of a project so extraordinarily broad involves engineering and mechanical conceptions of a high order, and, as we have seen, these have been brought to bear on the subject by Edison, together with an intimate knowledge of compounded materials.
To achieve a project this extensive requires advanced engineering and mechanical concepts, and as we've seen, Edison has applied these, along with a deep understanding of complex materials.
The main features of this invention are easily comprehensible with the aid of the following diagrammatic sectional sketch:
The key features of this invention are easy to understand with the help of the following diagrammatic sectional sketch:
It should be first understood that the above sketch is in broad outline, without elaboration, merely to illustrate the working principle; and while the upright structure on the right is intended to represent a set of molds in position to form a three-story house, with cellar, no regular details of such a building (such as windows, doors, stairways, etc.) are here shown, as they would only tend to complicate an explanation.
It should first be understood that the above sketch gives a broad overview, without going into detail, just to show how it works. The upright structure on the right is meant to represent a set of molds ready to create a three-story house, with a basement, but no specific details of the building (like windows, doors, stairways, etc.) are included here, as they would only complicate the explanation.
It will be noted that there are really two sets of molds, an inside and an outside set, leaving a space between them throughout. Although not shown in the sketch, there is in practice a number of bolts passing through these two sets of molds at various places to hold them together in their relative positions. In the open space between the molds there are placed steel rods for the purpose of reinforcement; while all through the entire structure provision is made for water and steam pipes, gas-pipes and electric-light wires being placed in appropriate positions as the molds are assembled.
It should be noted that there are actually two sets of molds, an inner set and an outer set, leaving a space between them. Although it’s not shown in the sketch, in practice, there are several bolts that go through these two sets of molds at various points to keep them in their proper positions. In the open space between the molds, steel rods are placed for reinforcement; meanwhile, throughout the entire structure, there is space made for water and steam pipes, gas pipes, and electric light wires to be installed in the right spots as the molds are assembled.
At the centre of the roof there will be noted a funnel-shaped opening. Into this there is delivered by the endless chain of buckets shown on the left a continuous stream of a special free-flowing concrete mixture. This mixture descends by gravity, and gradually fills the entire space between the two sets of molds. The delivery of the material—or "pouring," as it is called—is continued until every part of the space is filled and the mixture is even with the tip of the roof, thus completing the pouring, or casting, of the house. In a few days afterward the concrete will have hardened sufficiently to allow the molds to be taken away leaving an entire house, from cellar floor to the peak of the roof, complete in all its parts, even to mantels and picture molding, and requiring only windows and doors, plumbing, heating, and lighting fixtures to make it ready for habitation.
At the center of the roof, you'll see a funnel-shaped opening. Through this opening, a continuous stream of a special free-flowing concrete mix is delivered by the endless chain of buckets shown on the left. The mixture falls by gravity, gradually filling the entire space between the two sets of molds. This process, known as "pouring," continues until every part of the space is filled and the mixture is level with the top of the roof, completing the pouring or casting of the house. A few days later, the concrete will have hardened enough for the molds to be removed, leaving a complete house from the cellar floor to the peak of the roof, fully finished with features like mantels and picture molding, needing only windows, doors, plumbing, heating, and lighting fixtures to be ready for people to move in.
In the above sketch the concrete mixers, A, B, are driven by the electric motor, C. As the material is mixed it descends into the tank, D, and flows through a trough into a lower tank, E, in which it is constantly stirred, and from which it is taken by the endless chain of buckets and dumped into the funnel-shaped opening at the top of the molds, as above described.
In the sketch above, the concrete mixers, A and B, are powered by the electric motor, C. As the materials are mixed, they flow down into the tank, D, and move through a trough into a lower tank, E, where they are continuously stirred. From there, the mixture is collected by an endless chain of buckets and dumped into the funnel-shaped opening at the top of the molds, as described above.
The molds are made of cast-iron in sections of such size and weight as will be most convenient for handling, mostly in pieces not exceeding two by four feet in rectangular dimensions. The subjoined sketch shows an exterior view of several of these molds as they appear when bolted together, the intersecting central portions representing ribs, which are included as part of the casting for purposes of strength and rigidity.
The molds are made of cast iron in sections sized and weighted for easy handling, usually in pieces no larger than two by four feet in rectangular dimensions. The sketch below shows an exterior view of several of these molds when bolted together, with the intersecting central parts representing ribs, which are included in the casting for added strength and stability.
The molds represented above are those for straight work, such as walls and floors. Those intended for stairways, eaves, cornices, windows, doorways, etc., are much more complicated in design, although the same general principles are employed in their construction.
The molds shown above are for straight work, like walls and floors. The ones used for stairways, eaves, cornices, windows, doorways, etc., are more complex in design, even though they use the same basic principles in their construction.
While the philosophy of pouring or casting a complete house in its entirety is apparently quite simple, the development of the engineering and mechanical questions involves the solution of a vast number of most intricate and complicated problems covering not only the building as a whole, but its numerous parts, down to the minutest detail. Safety, convenience, duration, and the practical impossibility of altering a one-piece solid dwelling are questions that must be met before its construction, and therefore Edison has proceeded calmly on his way toward the goal he has ever had clearly in mind, with utter indifference to the criticisms and jeers of those who, as "experts," have professed positive knowledge of the impossibility of his carrying out this daring scheme.
While the idea of pouring or casting an entire house at once seems straightforward, developing the engineering and mechanical aspects involves solving a vast number of complex and intricate problems that affect not just the building as a whole, but also all its components down to the smallest detail. Issues like safety, convenience, durability, and the nearly impossible task of modifying a solid, one-piece home must be addressed before construction begins. Thus, Edison has calmly moved forward toward his clearly defined goal, completely unfazed by the criticisms and mockery from those who claim, as "experts," to know for sure that his ambitious plan can’t be realized.
LIST OF UNITED STATES PATENTS
List of United States patents granted to Thomas A. Edison, arranged according to dates of execution of applications for such patents. This list shows the inventions as Mr. Edison has worked upon them from year to year 1868 NO. TITLE OF PATENT DATE EXECUTED DATE EXECUTED 90,646, Electrographic Vote Recorder . . . . .Oct. 13, 1868 1869 91,527 Printing Telegraph (reissued October 25, 1870, numbered 4166, and August 5, 1873, numbered 5519). . . . . . . .Jan. 25, 1869 96,567 Apparatus for Printing Telegraph (reissued February 1, 1870, numbered 3820). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 17, 1869 96,681 Electrical Switch for Telegraph Apparatus Aug. 27, 1869 102,320 Printing Telegraph—Pope and Edison (reissued April 17, 1877, numbered 7621, and December 9, 1884, numbered 10,542). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 16, 1869 103,924 Printing Telegraphs—Pope and Edison (reissued August 5, 1873) 1870 103,035 Electromotor Escapement. . . . . . . . Feb. 5, 1870 128,608 Printing Telegraph Instruments . . . . .May 4, 1870 114,656 Telegraph Transmitting Instruments . .June 22, 1870 114,658 Electro Magnets for Telegraph Instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 22, 1870 114,657 Relay Magnets for Telegraph Instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 6, 1870 111,112 Electric Motor Governors . . . . . . .June 29, 1870 113,033 Printing Telegraph Apparatus . . . . .Nov. 17, 1870 1871 113,034 Printing Telegraph Apparatus . . . . .Jan. 10, 1871 123,005 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 123,006 Printing Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 123,984 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 124,800 Telegraphic Recording Instruments. . .Aug. 12, 1871 121,601 Machinery for Perforating Paper for Telegraph Purposes . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1871 126,535 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1871 133,841 Typewriting Machine. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1871 1872 126,532 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 3 1872 126,531 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1872 126,534 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1872 126,528 Type Wheels for Printing Telegraphs. .Jan. 23, 1872 126,529 Type Wheels for Printing Telegraphs. .Jan. 23, 1872 126,530 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 14, 1872 126,533 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 14, 1872 132,456 Apparatus for Perforating Paper for Telegraphic Use. . . . . . . . . . . March 15, 1872 132,455 Improvement in Paper for Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 10, 1872 133,019 Electrical Printing Machine. . . . . April 18, 1872 128,131 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,604 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,605 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,606 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,607 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 131,334 Rheotomes or Circuit Directors . . . . .May 6, 1872 134,867 Automatic Telegraph Instruments. . . . .May 8, 1872 134,868 Electro Magnetic Adjusters . . . . . . .May 8, 1872 130,795 Electro Magnets. . . . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1872 131,342 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1872 131,341 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . May 28, 1872 131,337 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,340 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,343 Transmitters and Circuits for Printing Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,335 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1872 131,336 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1872 131,338 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 29, 1872 131,339 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 29, 1872 131,344 Unison Stops for Printing Telegraphs .June 29, 1872 134,866 Printing and Telegraph Instruments . .Oct. 16, 1872 138,869 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1872 142,999 Galvanic Batteries . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1872 141,772 Automatic or Chemical Telegraphs . . . Nov. 5, 1872 135,531 Circuits for Chemical Telegraphs . . . Nov. 9, 1872 146,812 Telegraph Signal Boxes . . . . . . . .Nov. 26, 1872 141,773 Circuits for Automatic Telegraphs. . .Dec. 12, 1872 141,776 Circuits for Automatic Telegraphs. . .Dec. 12, 1872 150,848 Chemical or Automatic Telegraphs . . .Dec. 12, 1872
List of United States patents granted to Thomas A. Edison, organized by the dates when the applications for these patents were filed. This list showcases the inventions Mr. Edison has developed over the years. 1868 NO. TITLE OF PATENT DATE EXECUTED DATE EXECUTED 90,646, Electrographic Vote Recorder . . . . .Oct. 13, 1868 1869 91,527 Printing Telegraph (reissued October 25, 1870, numbered 4166, and August 5, 1873, numbered 5519). . . . . . . .Jan. 25, 1869 96,567 Apparatus for Printing Telegraph (reissued February 1, 1870, numbered 3820). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 17, 1869 96,681 Electrical Switch for Telegraph Apparatus Aug. 27, 1869 102,320 Printing Telegraph–Pope and Edison (reissued April 17, 1877, numbered 7621, and December 9, 1884, numbered 10,542). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 16, 1869 103,924 Printing Telegraphs–Pope and Edison (reissued August 5, 1873) 1870 103,035 Electromotor Escapement. . . . . . . . Feb. 5, 1870 128,608 Printing Telegraph Instruments . . . . .May 4, 1870 114,656 Telegraph Transmitting Instruments . .June 22, 1870 114,658 Electro Magnets for Telegraph Instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 22, 1870 114,657 Relay Magnets for Telegraph Instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 6, 1870 111,112 Electric Motor Governors . . . . . . .June 29, 1870 113,033 Printing Telegraph Apparatus . . . . .Nov. 17, 1870 1871 113,034 Printing Telegraph Apparatus . . . . .Jan. 10, 1871 123,005 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 123,006 Printing Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 123,984 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1871 124,800 Telegraphic Recording Instruments. . .Aug. 12, 1871 121,601 Machinery for Perforating Paper for Telegraph Purposes . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1871 126,535 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1871 133,841 Typewriting Machine. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1871 1872 126,532 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 3 1872 126,531 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1872 126,534 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1872 126,528 Type Wheels for Printing Telegraphs. .Jan. 23, 1872 126,529 Type Wheels for Printing Telegraphs. .Jan. 23, 1872 126,530 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 14, 1872 126,533 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 14, 1872 132,456 Apparatus for Perforating Paper for Telegraphic Use. . . . . . . . . . . March 15, 1872 132,455 Improvement in Paper for Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 10, 1872 133,019 Electrical Printing Machine. . . . . April 18, 1872 128,131 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,604 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,605 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,606 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 128,607 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 26, 1872 131,334 Rheotomes or Circuit Directors . . . . .May 6, 1872 134,867 Automatic Telegraph Instruments. . . . .May 8, 1872 134,868 Electro Magnetic Adjusters . . . . . . .May 8, 1872 130,795 Electro Magnets. . . . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1872 131,342 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1872 131,341 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . May 28, 1872 131,337 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,340 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,343 Transmitters and Circuits for Printing Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1872 131,335 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1872 131,336 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1872 131,338 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 29, 1872 131,339 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .June 29, 1872 131,344 Unison Stops for Printing Telegraphs .June 29, 1872 134,866 Printing and Telegraph Instruments . .Oct. 16, 1872 138,869 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1872 142,999 Galvanic Batteries . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1872 141,772 Automatic or Chemical Telegraphs . . . Nov. 5, 1872 135,531 Circuits for Chemical Telegraphs . . . Nov. 9, 1872 146,812 Telegraph Signal Boxes . . . . . . . .Nov. 26, 1872 141,773 Circuits for Automatic Telegraphs. . .Dec. 12, 1872 141,776 Circuits for Automatic Telegraphs. . .Dec. 12, 1872 150,848 Chemical or Automatic Telegraphs . . .Dec. 12, 1872
1873 139,128 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1873 139,129 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 140,487 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 140,489 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 138,870 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 141,774 Chemical Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 141,775 Perforator for Automatic Telegraphs. .March 7, 1873 141,777 Relay Magnets. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 142,688 Electric Regulators for Transmitting Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 156,843 Duplex Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . .March 7, 1873 147,312 Perforators for Automatic Telegraphy March 24, 1873 147,314 Circuits for Chemical Telegraphs . . March 24, 1873 150,847 Receiving Instruments for Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 24, 1873 140,488 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,311 Electric Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,313 Chemical Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,917 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 150,846 Telegraph Relays . . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 160,405 Adjustable Electro Magnets for Relays, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 162,633 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . April 22, 1873 151,209 Automatic Telegraphy and Perforators Therefor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1873 160,402 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperSept. 29, 1873 160,404 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperSept. 29, 1873 160,580 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperOct. 14, 1873 160,403 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperOct. 29, 1873 1874
1873 139,128 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1873 139,129 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 140,487 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 140,489 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1873 138,870 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 141,774 Chemical Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 141,775 Perforator for Automatic Telegraphs. .March 7, 1873 141,777 Relay Magnets. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 142,688 Electric Regulators for Transmitting Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1873 156,843 Duplex Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . .March 7, 1873 147,312 Perforators for Automatic Telegraphy March 24, 1873 147,314 Circuits for Chemical Telegraphs . . March 24, 1873 150,847 Receiving Instruments for Chemical Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 24, 1873 140,488 Printing Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,311 Electric Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,313 Chemical Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 147,917 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 150,846 Telegraph Relays . . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 160,405 Adjustable Electro Magnets for Relays, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . April 23, 1873 162,633 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . April 22, 1873 151,209 Automatic Telegraphy and Perforators Therefor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1873 160,402 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperSept. 29, 1873 160,404 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperSept. 29, 1873 160,580 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperOct. 14, 1873 160,403 Solutions for Chemical Telegraph PaperOct. 29, 1873 1874
154,788 District Telegraph Signal Box. . . . .April 2, 1874 168,004 Printing Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1874 166,859 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 166,860 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 166,861 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 158,787 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 172,305 Automatic Roman Character Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 173,718 Automatic Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 178,221 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . Aug. 19, 1874 178,222 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 178,223 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 180,858 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 207,723 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 480,567 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 207,724 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 14, 1874
154,788 District Telegraph Signal Box. . . . .April 2, 1874 168,004 Printing Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1874 166,859 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 166,860 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 166,861 Chemical Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . June 1, 1874 158,787 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 172,305 Automatic Roman Character Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 173,718 Automatic Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1874 178,221 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . Aug. 19, 1874 178,222 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 178,223 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 180,858 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 207,723 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 480,567 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 19, 1874 207,724 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 14, 1874
1875 168,242 Transmitter and Receiver for Automatic Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,243 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,385 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,466 Solution for Chemical Telegraphs . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,467 Recording Point for Chemical Telegraph Jan. 18, 1875 195,751 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . Jan. 18 1875 195,752 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1875 171,273 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . Feb 11, 1875 169,972 Electric Signalling Instrument . . . . Feb 24, 1875 209,241 Quadruplex Telegraph Repeaters (reissued September 23, 1879, numbered 8906). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb 24, 1875 1876 180,857 Autographic Printing . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1876 198,088 Telephonic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . .April 3, 1876 198,089 Telephonic or Electro Harmonic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 3, 1876 182,996 Acoustic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1876 186,330 Acoustic Electric Telegraphs . . . . . .May 9, 1876 186,548 Telegraph Alarm and Signal Apparatus . .May 9, 1876 198,087 Telephonic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1876 185,507 Electro Harmonic Multiplex Telegraph .Aug. 16, 1876 200,993 Acoustic Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 26, 1876 235,142 Acoustic Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 26, 1876 200,032 Synchronous Movements for Electric Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 30, 1876 200,994 Automatic Telegraph Perforator and Transmitter. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 30, 1876 1877 205,370 Pneumatic Stencil Pens . . . . . . . . Feb. 3, 1877 213,554 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . Feb. 3, 1877 196,747 Stencil Pens . . . . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 203,329 Perforating Pens . . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 474,230 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 217,781 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 230,621 Addressing Machine . . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 377,374 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 453,601 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 452,913 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 512,872 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 474,231 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . July 9, 1877 203,014 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1877 208,299 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1877 203,015 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1877 420,594 Quadruplex Telegraph . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1877 492,789 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1877 203,013 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 8, 1877 203 018 Telephone or Speaking Telegraph. . . . Dec. 8, 1877 200 521 Phonograph or Speaking Machine . . . .Dec. 15, 1877 1878 203,019 Circuit for Acoustic or Telephonic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1878 201,760 Speaking Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 203,016 Speaking Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 203,017 Telephone Call Signals . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 214,636 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1878 222,390 Carbon Telephones. . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 8, 1878 217,782 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 11, 1878 214,637 Thermal Regulator for Electric Lights.Nov. 14, 1878 210,767 Vocal Engines. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1878 218,166 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 218,866 Electric Lighting Apparatus. . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 219,628 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 295,990 Typewriter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 4, 1878 218,167 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 31, 1878 1879 224,329 Electric Lighting Apparatus. . . . . .Jan. 23, 1879 227,229 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1879 227,227 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 6, 1879 224.665 Autographic Stencils for Printing. . March 10, 1879 227.679 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 19, 1879 221,957 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 24, 1879 227,229 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . April 12, 1879 264,643 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . April 21, 1879 219,393 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . July 7, 1879 231,704 Electro Chemical Receiving Telephone .July 17, 1879 266,022 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 1, 1879 252,442 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 4, 1879 222,881 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . .Sept. 4, 1879 223,898 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 1, 1879 1880 230,255 Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1880 248,425 Apparatus for Producing High Vacuums Jan.28 1880 265,311 Electric Lamp and Holder for Same. . . Jan. 28 1880 369,280 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Jan. 28, 1880 227,226 Safety Conductor for Electric Lights .March 10,1880 228,617 Brake for Electro Magnetic Motors. . March 10, 1880 251,545 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . March 10, 1880 525,888 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 10, 1880 264,649 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. March 11, 1880 228,329 Magnetic Ore Separator . . . . . . . .April 3, 1880 238,868 Manufacture of Carbons for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . April 25, 1880 237,732 Electric Light . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1880 248,417 Manufacturing Carbons for Electric Lights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1880 298,679 Treating Carbons for Electric Lights .June 15, 1880 248,430 Electro Magnetic Brake . . . . . . . . July 2, 1880 265,778 Electro Magnetic Railway Engine. . . . July 3, 1880 248,432 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1880 239,150 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1880 239,372 Testing Electric Light Carbons—Edison and Batchelor. . . . . . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 251,540 Carbon Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 263,139 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 434,585 Telegraph Relay. . . . . . . . . . . .July 29, 1880 248 423 Carbonizer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 30, 1880 263 140 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 30, 1880 248,434 Governor for Electric Engines. . . . .July 31, 1880 239,147 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .July 31, 1880 264,642 Electric Distribution and Translation System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 4, 1880 293,433 Insulation of Railroad Tracks used for Electric Circuits. . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 6, 1880 239,373 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 239,745 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 263,135 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 251,546 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 10, 1880 239,153 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1880 351,855 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1880 248,435 Utilizing Electricity as Motive Power.Aug. 12, 1880 263,132 Electro Magnetic Roller. . . . . . . .Aug. 14, 1880 264,645 System of Conductors for the Distribution of Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 1, 1880 240,678 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 22, 1880 239,152 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .Oct. 14, 1880 239,148 Treating Carbons for Electric Lights .Oct. 15, 1880 238,098 Magneto Signalling Apparatus—Edison and Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 242,900 Manufacturing Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 251,556 Regulator for Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 248,426 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 5, 1880 239,151 Forming Enlarged Ends on Carbon Filaments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 19, 1880 12,631 Design Patent—Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 23, 1880 239,149 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 242,896 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 242,897 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 248,565 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 263,878 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 239,154 Relay for Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 242,898 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 248,431 Preserving Fruit . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 265,777 Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps. .Dec. 11, 1880 239,374 Regulating the Generation of Electric Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 16, 1880 248,428 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 16, 1880 248,427 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1880 248,437 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1880 248,416 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 30, 1880 1881 242,899 Electric Lighting. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 248,418 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 19 1881 248,433 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 19 1881 251,548 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 406,824 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 248,422 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .Jan. 20, 1881 431,018 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . Feb. 3, 1881 242,901 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1881 248,429 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1881 248,421 Current Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 25, 1881 251,550 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. .Feb. 26, 1881 251,555 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 26, 1881 482,549 Means for Controlling Electric Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 2, 1881 248,420 Fixture and Attachment for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1881 251,553 Electric Chandeliers . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1881 251,554 Electric Lamp and Socket or Holder . .March 7, 1881 248,424 Fitting and Fixtures for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 8, 1881 248,419 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1881 251,542 System of Electric Light . . . . . . April 19, 1881 263,145 Making Incandescents . . . . . . . . April 19, 1881 266,447 Electric Incandescent Lamp . . . . . April 21, 1881 251,552 Underground Conductors . . . . . . . April 22, 1881 476,531 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . April 22, 1881 248,436 Depositing Cell for Plating the Connections of Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 251,539 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 263,136 Regulator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 251,557 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1881 263,134 Regulator for Magneto Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1881 251,541 Electro Magnetic Motor . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,544 Manufacture of Electric Lamps. . . . . May 20, 1881 251,549 Electric Lamp and the Manufacture thereof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,558 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 341,644 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,551 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . . May 21, 1881 263,137 Electric Chandelier. . . . . . . . . . May 21, 1881 263,141 Straightening Carbons for Incandescent Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 21, 1881 264,657 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . May 21, 1881 251,543 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . May 24, 1881 251,538 Electric Light . . . . . . . . . . . . May 27, 1881 425,760 Measurement of Electricity in Distribution System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 3 1, 1881 251,547 Electrical Governor. . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1881 263,150 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. June 3, 1881 263,131 Magnetic Ore Separator . . . . . . . . June 4, 1881 435,687 Means for Charging and Using Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 21, 1881 263,143 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. .June 24, 1881 251,537 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1881 263,147 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . .July 1, 188 1 439,389 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . . July 1, 1881 263,149 Commutator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .July 22, 1881 479,184 Facsimile Telegraph—Edison and Kenny.July 26, 1881 400,317 Ore Separator. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1881 425,763 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 20, 1881 263,133 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . .Aug. 24, 1881 263,142 Electrical Distribution System . . . .Aug. 24, 1881 264,647 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. .Aug. 24, 1881 404,902 Electrical Distribution System . . . .Aug. 24, 1881 257,677 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 7, 1881 266,021 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 7, 1881 263,144 Mold for Carbonizing Incandescents . Sept. 19, 1881 265,774 Maintaining Temperatures in Webermeters. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 21, 1881 264,648 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Sept. 23, 1881 265,776 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . Sept. 27, 1881 524,136 Regulator for Dynamo Electrical Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 27, 1881 273,715 Malleableizing Iron. . . . . . . . . . Oct. 4, 1881 281,352 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1881 446,667 Locomotives for Electric Railways. . .Oct. 11, 1881 288,318 Regulator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1881 263,148 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Oct. 25, 1881 264,646 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Oct. 25, 1881 251,559 Electrical Drop Light. . . . . . . . .Oct. 25, 1881 266,793 Electric Distribution System . . . . .Oct. 25, 1881 358,599 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 29, 1881 264,673 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machine. Nov. 3, 1881 263,138 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 7, 1881 265,775 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 7 1881 297,580 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 7 1881 263,146 Dynamo Magneto Electric Machines . . .Nov. 22, 1881 266,588 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 25, 1881 251,536 Vacuum Pump. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,650 Manufacturing Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,660 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 379,770 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 293,434 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 439,391 Junction Box for Electric Wires. . . . Dec. 5, 1881 454,558 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,653 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1881 358,600 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1881 264,652 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1881 278,419 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1881 1882 265,779 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1882 264,654 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,661 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Feb. 10, 1882 264,664 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Feb. 10, 1882 264,668 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Feb. 10, 1882 264,669 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,671 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 275,613 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 401,646 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,658 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 264,659 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 265,780 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 265,781 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 278,416 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 379,771 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 272,034 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 274,576 Transmitting Telephone . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 274,577 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 264,662 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,663 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,665 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,666 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 268,205 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 273,488 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 273,492 Secondary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1882 460,122 Process of and Apparatus for Generating Electricity . . . . . . . . May 19, 1882 466,460 Electrolytic Decomposition . . . . . .May 19,. 1882 264,672 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 264,667 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 265,786 Apparatus for Electrical Transmission of Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 273,828 System of Underground Conductors of Electric Distribution. . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 379,772 System of Electrical Distribution. . . May 22, 1882 274,292 Secondary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1882 281,353 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . June 3, 1882 287,523 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . June 3, 1882 365,509 Filament for Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 3 1882 446,668 Electric Are Light . . . . . . . . . . .June 3 1882 543,985 Incandescent Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1882 264,651 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . June 9, 1882 264,655 Incandescing Electric Lamps. . . . . . June 9, 1882 264,670 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 9, 1882 273,489 Turn-Table for Electric Railway. . . . June 9, 1882 273,490 Electro Magnetic Railway System. . . . June 9, 1882 401,486 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 12, 1882 476,527 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 12, 1882 439,390 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .June 19, 1882 446,666 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 19, 1882 464,822 System of Distributing Electricity . .June 19, 1882 304,082 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . .June 24, 1882 274,296 Manufacture of Incandescents . . . . . July 5, 1882 264,656 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . July 7, 1882 265,782 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,783 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,784 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,785 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 273,494 Electrical Railroad. . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 278,418 Translating Electric Currents from High to Low Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 293,435 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 334,853 Mold for Carbonizing . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 339,278 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 273,714 Magnetic Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 282,287 Magnetic Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 448,778 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 439,392 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .Aug. 12, 1882 271,613 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 287,518 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 406,825 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 439,393 Carbonizing Chamber. . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 273,487 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Sept. 12, 1882 297,581 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 12, 1882 395,962 Manufacturing Electric Lamps . . . . Sept. 16, 1882 287,525 Regulator for Systems of Electrical Distribution—Edison and C. L. Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 4, 1882 365,465 Valve Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1882 317,631 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1882 307,029 Filament for Incandescent Lamp . . . . Oct. 9, 1882 268,206 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 10, 1882 273,486 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 12, 1882 274,293 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 275,612 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 430,932 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 271,616 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1882 543,986 Process for Treating Products Derived from Vegetable Fibres. . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1882 543,987 Filament for Incandescent Lamps. . . .Oct. 17, 1882 271,614 Shafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 271,615 Governor for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,491 Regulator for Driving Engines of Electrical Generators. . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,493 Valve Gear for Electrical Generator Engines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 411,016 Manufacturing Carbon Filaments . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 492,150 Coating Conductors for Incandescent Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,485 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 317,632 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 317,633 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 287,520 Incandescing Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 3, 1882 353,783 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Nov. 3, 1882 430,933 Filament for Incandescent Lamps. . . . Nov. 3, 1882 274,294 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1882 281,350 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1882 274,295 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Nov. 14, 1882 276,233 Electrical Generator and Motor . . . .Nov. 14, 1882 274,290 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 20, 1882 274,291 Mold for Carbonizer. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 278,413 Regulator for Dynamo Electric MachinesNov. 28, 1882 278,414 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 287,519 Manufacturing Incandescing Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 287,524 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 438,298 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 276,232 Operating and Regulating Electrical Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 20, 1882 1883 278,415 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 278,417 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 281,349 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 283,985 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Jan. 13 1883 283,986 System o' Electrical Distribution. . . Jan. 13 1883 459,835 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 13,940 Design Patent—Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 13 1883 280,727 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Feb. 13 1883 395,123 Circuit Controller for Dynamo Machine.Feb. 13, 1883 287,521 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . .Feb. 17, 1883 287,522 Molds for Carbonizing. . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 438,299 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Feb. 17, 1883 446,669 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 476,528 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 281,351 Electrical Generator . . . . . . . . .March 5, 1883 283,984 System of Electrical Distribution. . .March 5, 1883 287,517 System of Electrical Distribution. . .March 14,1883 283,983 System of Electrical Distribution. . .April 5, 1883 354,310 Manufacture of Carbon Conductors . . .April 6, 1883 370,123 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .April 6, 1883 411,017 Carbonizing Flask. . . . . . . . . . .April 6, 1883 370,124 Manufacture of Filament for Incandescing Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . April 12, 1883 287,516 System of Electrical Distribution. . . .May 8, 1883 341,839 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . .May 8, 1883 398,774 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . .May 8, 1883 370,125 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,126 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,127 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,128 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,129 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,130 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,131 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 438,300 Gauge for Testing Fibres for Incandescent Lamp Carbons. . . . . . . June 1, 1883 287,511 Electric Regulator . . . . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,512 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,513 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,514 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,515 System of Electrical Distribution. . .June 25, 1883 297,582 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 328,572 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machines June 25, 1883 430,934 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 438,301 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 25, 1883 297,583 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 304,083 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 27; 1883 304,084 Device for Protecting Electric Light Systems from Lightning . . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 438,302 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 476,529 System of Electrical Distribution. . .July 27, 1883 297,584 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . Aug. 8, 1883 307,030 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 8, 1883 297,585 Incandescing Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 297,586 Electrical Conductor . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 435,688 Process and Apparatus for Generating Electricity. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 470,922 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Lamps . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 490,953 Generating Electricity . . . . . . . . Oct. 9, 1883 293,432 Electrical Generator or Motor. . . . .Oct. 17, 1883 307,031 Electrical Indicator . . . . . . . . . Nov. 2, 1883 337,254 Telephone—Edison and Bergmann . . . .Nov. 10, 1883 297,587 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1883 298,954 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 15, 1883 298,955 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 15, 1883 304,085 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 15, 1883 509,517 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 15, 1883 425,761 Incandescent Lamp. . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 20, 1883 304,086 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1883 1884 298,956 Operating Dynamo Electric Machine. . . Jan. 5, 1884 304,087 Electrical Conductor . . . . . . . . .Jan. 12, 1884 395,963 Incandescent Lamp Filament . . . . . .Jan. 22, 1884 526,147 Plating One Material with Another. . .Jan. 22, 1884 339,279 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Feb. 8, 1884 314,115 Chemical Stock Quotation Telegraph— Edison and Kenny . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 9, 1884 436,968 Method and Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1884 436,969 Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . June 2, 1884 438,303 Arc Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1884 343,017 System of Electrical Distribution. . .June 27, 1884 391,595 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .July 16, 1884 328,573 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 328,574 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 328,575 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 391,596 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 24, 1884 438,304 Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . Sept. 24, 1884 422,577 Apparatus for Speaking Telephones— Edison and Gilliland . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1884 329,030 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1884 422,578 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 422,579 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 340,707 Telephonic Repeater. . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 340,708 Electrical Signalling Apparatus. . . .Dec. 19, 1884 347,097 Electrical Signalling Apparatus. . . .Dec. 19, 1884 478,743 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 31, 1884 1885 340,709 Telephone Circuit—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 2, 1885 378,044 Telephone Transmitter. . . . . . . . . Jan. 9, 1885 348,114 Electrode for Telephone Transmitters .Jan. 12, 1885 438,305 Fuse Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 14, 1885 350,234 System of Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 27,1885 486,634 System of Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 27,1885 333,289 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 27, 1885 333,290 Duplex Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . April 30, 1885 333,291 Way Station Quadruplex Telegraph . . . .May 6, 1885 465,971 Means for Transmitting Signals Electrically May 14, 1885 422 072 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1885 437 422 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1885 422,073 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. I 2, 1885 422,074 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 24, 1885 435,689 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 30, 1885 438,306 Telephone - Edison and Gilliland . . .Dec. 22, 1885 350,235 Railway Telegraphy—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 28, 1885 1886 406,567 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1886 474,232 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1886 370 132 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 11, 1886 411,018 Manufacture of Incandescent Lamps. . .July 15, 1886 438,307 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July I 5, 1886 448,779 Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July IS, 1886 411,019 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1886 406,130 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 6, 1886 351,856 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 30, 1886 454,262 Incandescent Lamp Filaments. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1886 466,400 Cut-Out for Incandescent Lamps—Edison and J. F. Ott. . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 26, 1886 484,184 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Oct. 26, 1886 490,954 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 2, 1886 438,308 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 9, 1886 524,378 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 9, 1886 365,978 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 22, 1886 369 439 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 22, 1886 384 830 Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland Nov. 24, 1886 379,944 Commutator for Dynamo Electric MachinesNov. 26, 1886 411,020 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Nov. 26, 1886 485,616 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . .Dec 6, 1886 485,615 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . .Dec 6, 1886 525,007 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . Dec. 6, 1886 369,441 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 10, 1886 369,442 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 16, 1886 369,443 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 16, 1886 484,185 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Dec. 20, 1886 534,207 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Dec. 20, 1886 373,584 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1886 1887 468,949 Converter System for Electric Railways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 7, 1887 380,100 Pyromagnetic Motor . . . . . . . . . . May 24, 1887 476,983 Pyromagnetic Generator . . . . . . . . .May 24 1887 476,530 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . June 1, 1887 377,518 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .June 30, 1887 470,923 Railway Signalling . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 9, 1887 545,405 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Aug. 26, 1887 380,101 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Sept. 13 1887 380,102 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Sept. 14 1887 470,924 Electric Conductor . . . . . . . . . Sept. 26, 1887 563,462 Method of and Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1887 385,173 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 5, 1887 506,215 Making Plate Glass . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 9, 1887 382,414 Burnishing Attachments for PhonographsNov. 22, 1887 386,974 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 22, 1887 430,570 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 22, 1887 382,416 Feed and Return Mechanism for PhonographsNov. 29, 1887 382,415 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Dec. 4, 1887 382,462 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1887 1888 484,582 Duplicating Phonograms . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1888 434,586 Electric Generator . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1888 434,587 Thermo Electric Battery. . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1888 382,417 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . .Jan. 30, 1888 389,369 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . Feb. 2, 1888 382,418 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 390,462 Making Carbon Filaments. . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 394,105 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 394,106 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 382,419 Duplicating Phonograms . . . . . . . .March 3, 1888 425,762 Cut-Out for Incandescent Lamps . . . .March 3, 1888 396,356 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .March 19,1888 393,462 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . April 28, 1888 393,463 Machine for Making Phonogram Blanks. April 28, 1888 393,464 Machine for Making Phonogram Blanks. April 28, 1888 534,208 Induction Converter. . . . . . . . . . .May 7, 1888 476,991 Method of and Apparatus for Separating Ores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1888 400,646 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . . May 22, 1888 488,190 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . . May 22, 1888 488,189 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 26, 1888 470,925 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .June 21, 1888 393,465 Preparing Phonograph Recording Surfaces June 30, 1888 400,647 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 30, 1888 448,780 Device for Turning Off Phonogram Blanks June 30, 1888 393,466 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 393,966 Recording and Reproducing Sounds . . .July 14, 1888 393,967 Recording and Reproducing Sounds . . .July 14, 1888 430,274 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 437,423 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 450,740 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 485,617 Incandescent Lamp Filament . . . . . .July 14, 1888 448,781 Turning-Off Device for Phonographs . .July 16, 1888 400,648 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1888 499,879 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1888 397,705 Winding Field Magnets. . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1888 435,690 Making Armatures for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1888 430,275 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . Sept. 12, 1888 474,591 Extracting Gold from Sulphide Ores . Sept. 12, 1888 397,280 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . Sept. 19, 1888 397,706 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 29, 1888 400,649 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . Sept. 29, 1888 400,650 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 406,568 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 437,424 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 393,968 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1888 1889 406,569 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 10, 1889 488,191 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 10, 1889 430,276 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 12, 1889 406,570 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,571 Treating Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,572 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,573 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,574 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,575 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,576 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 430,277 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 437,425 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 414,759 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . March 22, 1889 414,760 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 22, 1889 462,540 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . March 22, 1889 430,278 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 8, 1889 438,309 Insulating Electrical Conductors . . April 25, 1889 423,039 Phonograph Doll or Other Toys. . . . .June 15, 1889 426,527 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1889 430,279 Voltaic Battery. . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1889 506,216 Apparatus for Making Glass . . . . . .June 29, 1889 414,761 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1889 430,280 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1889 437,426 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1889 465,972 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 14, 1889 443,507 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 11 1889 513,095 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 11 1889 1890 434,588 Magnetic Ore Separator—Edison and W. K. L. Dickson . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 16, 1890 437,427 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1890 465,250 Extracting Copper Pyrites. . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1890 434,589 Propelling Mechanism for Electric Vehicles Feb. 14, 1890 438,310 Lamp Base. . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 25, 1890 437,428 Propelling Device for Electric Cars. April 29, 1890 437,429 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . April 29, 1890 454,941 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . . .May 6, 1890 436,127 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1890 484,583 Phonograph Cutting Tool. . . . . . . . May 24, 1890 484,584 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . . May 24, 1890 436,970 Apparatus for Transmitting Power . . . June 2, 1890 453,741 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 454,942 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 456,301 Phonograph Doll. . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 484,585 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 456,302 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 4, 1890 476,984 Expansible Pulley. . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 9, 1890 493,858 Transmission of Power. . . . . . . . . Aug. 9, 1890 457,343 Magnetic Belting . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 6, 1890 444,530 Leading-in Wires for Incandescent Electric Lamps (reissued October 10, 1905, No. 12,393). . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 12, 1890 534 209 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 13, 1890 476 985 Trolley for Electric Railways. . . . .Oct. 27, 1890 500,280 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 27, 1890 541,923 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 27, 1890 457,344 Smoothing Tool for Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 17, 1890 460,123 Phonogram Blank Carrier. . . . . . . .Nov. 17, 1890 500,281 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 17, 1890 541,924 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 17, 1890 500,282 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 1, 1890 575,151 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 1, 1890 605,667 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 1, 1890 610,706 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 1, 1890 622,843 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 1, 1890 609,268 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 6, 1890 493,425 Electric Locomotive. . . . . . . . . .Dec. 20, 1890 1891 476,992 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Jan. 20, 1891 470,926 Dynamo Electric Machine or Motor . . . Feb. 4, 1891 496,191 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 4, 1891 476,986 Means for Propelling Electric Cars . .Feb. 24, 1891 476,987 Electric Locomotive. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1891 465,973 Armatures for Dynamos or Motors. . . .March 4, 1891 470,927 Driving Mechanism for Cars . . . . . .March 4, 1891 465,970 Armature Connection for Motors or Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 20, 1891 468,950 Commutator Brush for Electric Motors and Dynamos. . . . . . . . . . . . . March 20, 1891 475,491 Electric Locomotive. . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1891 475,492 Electric Locomotive. . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1891 475,493 Electric Locomotive. . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1891 475,494 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1891 463,251 Bricking Fine Ores . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 470,928 Alternating Current Generator. . . . .July 31, 1891 476,988 Lightning Arrester . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 476,989 Conductor for Electric Railways. . . .July 31, 1891 476,990 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 476,993 Electric Arc . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 484,183 Electrical Depositing Meter. . . . . .July 31, 1891 485,840 Bricking Fine Iron Ores. . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 493,426 Apparatus for Exhibiting Photographs of Moving Objects. . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 509,518 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 589,168 Kinetographic Camera (reissued September 30, 1902, numbered 12,037 and 12,038, and January 12, 1904, numbered 12,192) . . . . . . . . . . .July 31, 1891 470,929 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 471,268 Ore Conveyor and Method of Arranging Ore Thereon. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 472,288 Dust-Proof Bearings for Shafts . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 472,752 Dust-Proof Journal Bearings. . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 472,753 Ore-Screening Apparatus. . . . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 474,592 Ore-Conveying Apparatus. . . . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 474,593 Dust-Proof Swivel Shaft Bearing. . . .Aug. 28, 1891 498,385 Rollers for Ore-Crushing or Other Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 28, 1891 470,930 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . .Oct 8, 1891 476,532 Ore-Screening Apparatus. . . . . . . . .Oct 8, 1891 491,992 Cut-Out for Incandescent Electric Lamps Nov. 10, 1891 1892 491,993 Stop Device. . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 5 1892 564,423 Separating Ores. . . . . . . . . . . .June 2;, 1892 485,842 Magnetic Ore Separation. . . . . . . . July 9, 1892 485,841 Mechanically Separating Ores . . . . . July 9, 1892 513,096 Method of and Apparatus for Mixing Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 24, 1892 1893 509,428 Composition Brick and Making Same. . March 15, 1893 513,097 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1893 567,187 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1893 602 064 Conveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1893 534 206 Filament for Incandescent Lamps. . . .Dec. 15, 1893 1896 865,367 Fluorescent Electric Lamp. . . . . . . May 16, 1896 1897 604.740 Governor for Motors. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 25, 1897 607,588 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 25, 1897 637,327 Rolls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 14, 1897 672,616 Breaking Rock. . . . . . . . . . . . . May 14, 1897 675,056 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . . May 14, 1897 676,618 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . . May 14, 1897 605,475 Drying Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1897 605,668 Mixer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1897 667,201 Flight Conveyor. . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1897 671,314 Lubricating Journal Bearings . . . . .June 10, 1897 671,315 Conveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 10, 1897 675,057 Screening Pulverized Material. . . . .June 10, 1897 1898 713,209 Duplicating Phonograms . . . . . . . .Feb. 21, 1898 703,774 Reproducer for Phonographs . . . . . March 21, 1898 626,460 Filament for Incandescent Lamps and Manufacturing Same . . . . . . . . . .March 29,1898 648,933 Dryer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 11, 1898 661,238 Machine for Forming Pulverized Material in Briquettes . . . . . . . April 11, 1898 674,057 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . April 11, 1898 703,562 Apparatus for Bricking Pulverized Material April 11, 1898 704,010 Apparatus for Concentrating Magnetic Iron Ores. . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 11, 1898 659,389 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 19, 1898 1899 648,934 Screening or Sizing Very Fine Materials Feb. 6, 1899 663,015 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 6, 1899 688,610 Phonographic Recording Apparatus . . .Feb. 10, 1899 643,764 Reheating Compressed Air for Industrial Purposes. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1899 660,293 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .March 23,1899 641,281 Expanding Pulley—Edison and Johnson .March 28,1899 727,116 Grinding Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1899 652,457 Phonograph (reissued September 25, 1900, numbered 11,857) . . . . . . . Sept. 12, 1899 648,935 Apparatus for Duplicating Phonograph Records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 27, 1899 685,911 Apparatus for Reheating Compressed Air for Industrial Purposes. . . . . .Nov. 24, 1899 657,922 Apparatus for Reheating Compressed Air for Industrial Purposes. . . . . . Dec. 9, 1899 1900 676,840 Magnetic Separating Apparatus. . . . . Jan. 3, 1900 660,845 Apparatus for Sampling, Averaging, Mixing, and Storing Materials in Bulk Jan. 9, 1900 662,063 Process of Sampling, Averaging, Mixing, and Storing Materials in Bulk. . . . . Jan. 9, 1900 679,500 Apparatus for Screening Fine Materials Jan. 24, 1900 671,316 Apparatus for Screening Fine Materials Feb. 23, 1900 671,317 Apparatus for Screening Fine Materials March 28, 1900 759,356 Burning Portland Cement Clinker, etc April 10, 1900 759,357 Apparatus for Burning Portland Cement Clinker, etc . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 10 1900 655,480 Phonographic Reproducing Device. . . .April 30 1900 657,527 Making Metallic Phonograph Records . April 30, 1900 667,202 Duplicating Phonograph Records . . . April 30, 1900 667,662 Duplicating Phonograph Records . . . April 30, 1900 713,863 Coating Phonograph Records . . . . . . May IS, 1900 676,841 Magnetic Separating Apparatus. . . . . June 11 1900 759,358 Magnetic Separating Apparatus. . . . . June 11 1900 680,520 Phonograph Records . . . . . . . . . .July 23, 1900 672,617 Apparatus for Breaking Rock. . . . . . Aug. 1, 1900 676,225 Phonographic Recording Apparatus . . .Aug. 10, 1900 703,051 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 28, 1900 684,204 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . . Oct. IS 1900 871,214 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . . Oct. IS 1900 704,303 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Dec. 22, 1900 1901 700,136 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . . Feb. 18 1901 700,137 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . . Feb. 23 1901 704,304 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Feb. 23, 1901 704,305 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . . May 10, 1901 678,722 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .June 17, 1901 684,205 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .June 17, 1901 692,507 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .June 17, 1901 701,804 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .June 17, 1901 704,306 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .June 17, 1901 705,829 Reproducer for Sound Records . . . . .Oct. 24, 1901 831,606 Sound Recording Apparatus. . . . . . .Oct. 24, 1901 827,089 Calcining Furnaces . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 24, 1901
1875 168,242 Transmitter and Receiver for Automatic Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,243 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,385 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,466 Solution for Chemical Telegraphs . . .Jan. 18, 1875 168,467 Recording Point for Chemical Telegraph Jan. 18, 1875 195,751 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . Jan. 18 1875 195,752 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1875 171,273 Telegraph Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . Feb 11, 1875 169,972 Electric Signalling Instrument . . . . Feb 24, 1875 209,241 Quadruplex Telegraph Repeaters (reissued September 23, 1879, numbered 8906). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb 24, 1875 1876 180,857 Autographic Printing . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1876 198,088 Telephonic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . .April 3, 1876 198,089 Telephonic or Electro Harmonic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 3, 1876 182,996 Acoustic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1876 186,330 Acoustic Electric Telegraphs . . . . . .May 9, 1876 186,548 Telegraph Alarm and Signal Apparatus .May 9, 1876 198,087 Telephonic Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1876 185,507 Electro Harmonic Multiplex Telegraph .Aug. 16, 1876 200,993 Acoustic Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 26, 1876 235,142 Acoustic Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 26, 1876 200,032 Synchronous Movements for Electric Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 30, 1876 200,994 Automatic Telegraph Perforator and Transmitter. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 30, 1876 1877 205,370 Pneumatic Stencil Pens . . . . . . . . Feb. 3, 1877 213,554 Automatic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . Feb. 3, 1877 196,747 Stencil Pens . . . . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 203,329 Perforating Pens . . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 474,230 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . April 18, 1877 217,781 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 230,621 Addressing Machine . . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 377,374 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 8, 1877 453,601 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 452,913 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 512,872 Sextuplex Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . May 31, 1877 474,231 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . July 9, 1877 203,014 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1877 208,299 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1877 203,015 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1877 420,594 Quadruplex Telegraph . . . . . . . . .Aug. 16, 1877 492,789 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1877 203,013 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 8, 1877 203 018 Telephone or Speaking Telegraph. . . . Dec. 8, 1877 200 521 Phonograph or Speaking Machine . . . .Dec. 15, 1877 1878 203,019 Circuit for Acoustic or Telephonic Telegraphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 13, 1878 201,760 Speaking Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 203,016 Speaking Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 203,017 Telephone Call Signals . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1878 214,636 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1878 222,390 Carbon Telephones. . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 8, 1878 217,782 Duplex Telegraphs. . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 11, 1878 214,637 Thermal Regulator for Electric Lights.Nov. 14, 1878 210,767 Vocal Engines. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1878 218,166 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 218,866 Electric Lighting Apparatus. . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 219,628 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1878 295,990 Typewriter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 4, 1878 218,167 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 31, 1878 1879 224,329 Electric Lighting Apparatus. . . . . .Jan. 23, 1879 227,229 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1879 227,227 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 6, 1879 224.665 Autographic Stencils for Printing. . March 10, 1879 227.679 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 19, 1879 221,957 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 24, 1879 227,229 Electric Lights. . . . . . . . . . . April 12, 1879 264,643 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . April 21, 1879 219,393 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . July 7, 1879 231,704 Electro Chemical Receiving Telephone .July 17, 1879 266,022 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 1, 1879 252,442 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 4, 1879 222,881 Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . .Sept. 4, 1879 223,898 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 1, 1879 1880 230,255 Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1880 248,425 Apparatus for Producing High Vacuums Jan.28 1880 265,311 Electric Lamp and Holder for Same. . . Jan. 28 1880 369,280 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Jan. 28, 1880 227,226 Safety Conductor for Electric Lights .March 10,1880 228,617 Brake for Electro Magnetic Motors. . March 10, 1880 251,545 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . March 10, 1880 525,888 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 10, 1880 264,649 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. March 11, 1880 228,329 Magnetic Ore Separator . . . . . . . .April 3, 1880 238,868 Manufacture of Carbons for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . April 25, 1880 237,732 Electric Light . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1880 248,417 Manufacturing Carbons for Electric Lights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1880 298,679 Treating Carbons for Electric Lights .June 15, 1880 248,430 Electro Magnetic Brake . . . . . . . . July 2, 1880 265,778 Electro Magnetic Railway Engine. . . . July 3, 1880 248,432 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .July 26, 1880 239,150 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1880 239,372 Testing Electric Light Carbons—Edison and Batchelor. . . . . . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 251,540 Carbon Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 263,139 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 28, 1880 434,585 Telegraph Relay. . . . . . . . . . . .July 29, 1880 248 423 Carbonizer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 30, 1880 263 140 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 30, 1880 248,434 Governor for Electric Engines. . . . .July 31, 1880 239,147 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .July 31, 1880 264,642 Electric Distribution and Translation System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 4, 1880 293,433 Insulation of Railroad Tracks used for Electric Circuits. . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 6, 1880 239,373 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 239,745 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 263,135 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 7, 1880 251,546 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 10, 1880 239,153 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1880 351,855 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1880 248,435 Utilizing Electricity as Motive Power.Aug. 12, 1880 263,132 Electro Magnetic Roller. . . . . . . .Aug. 14, 1880 264,645 System of Conductors for the Distribution of Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 1, 1880 240,678 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 22, 1880 239,152 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .Oct. 14, 1880 239,148 Treating Carbons for Electric Lights .Oct. 15, 1880 238,098 Magneto Signalling Apparatus—Edison and Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 242,900 Manufacturing Carbons for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 251,556 Regulator for Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1880 248,426 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 5, 1880 239,151 Forming Enlarged Ends on Carbon Filaments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 19, 1880 12,631 Design Patent—Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 23, 1880 239,149 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 242,896 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 242,897 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 248,565 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 263,878 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1880 239,154 Relay for Telegraphs . . . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 242,898 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 248,431 Preserving Fruit . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 11, 1880 265,777 Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps. .Dec. 11, 1880 239,374 Regulating the Generation of Electric Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 16, 1880 248,428 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 16, 1880 248,427 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1880 248,437 Apparatus for Treating Carbons for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1880 248,416 Manufacture of Carbons for Electric Lights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 30, 1880 1881 242,899 Electric Lighting. . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 248,418 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 19 1881 248,433 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 19 1881 251,548 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 406,824 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1881 248,422 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .Jan. 20, 1881 431,018 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . Feb. 3, 1881 242,901 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1881 248,429 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 24, 1881 248,421 Current Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 25, 1881 251,550 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. .Feb. 26, 1881 251,555 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 26, 1881 482,549 Means for Controlling Electric Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 2, 1881 248,420 Fixture and Attachment for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1881 251,553 Electric Chandeliers . . . . . . . . .March 7, 1881 251,554 Electric Lamp and Socket or Holder . .March 7, 1881 248,424 Fitting and Fixtures for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 8, 1881 248,419 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1881 251,542 System of Electric Light . . . . . . April 19, 1881 263,145 Making Incandescents . . . . . . . . April 19, 1881 266,447 Electric Incandescent Lamp . . . . . April 21, 1881 251,552 Underground Conductors . . . . . . . April 22, 1881 476,531 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . April 22, 1881 248,436 Depositing Cell for Plating the Connections of Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 251,539 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 263,136 Regulator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1881 251,557 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1881 263,134 Regulator for Magneto Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1881 251,541 Electro Magnetic Motor . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,544 Manufacture of Electric Lamps. . . . . May 20, 1881 251,549 Electric Lamp and the Manufacture thereof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,558 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 20, 1881 341,644 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . May 20, 1881 251,551 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . . May 21, 1881 263,137 Electric Chandelier. . . . . . . . . . May 21, 1881 263,141 Straightening Carbons for Incandescent Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 21, 1881 264,657 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . May 21, 1881 251,543 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . May 24, 1881 251,538 Electric Light . . . . . . . . . . . . May 27, 1881 425,760 Measurement of Electricity in Distribution System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 3 1, 1881 251,547 Electrical Governor. . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1881 263,150 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. June 3, 1881 263,131 Magnetic Ore Separator . . . . . . . . June 4, 1881 435,687 Means for Charging and Using Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 21, 1881 263,143 Magneto or Dynamo Electric Machines. .June 24, 1881 251,537 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1881 263,147 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . .July 1, 188 1 439,389 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . . July 1, 1881 263,149 Commutator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .July 22, 1881 479,184 Facsimile Telegraph—Edison and Kenny.July 26, 1881 400,317 Ore Separator. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 11, 1881 425,763 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 20, 1881 263,133 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . .Aug. 24, 1881 263,142 Electrical Distribution System . . . .Aug. 24, 1881 264,647 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. .Aug. 24, 1881 404,902 Electrical Distribution System . . . .Aug. 24, 1881 257,677 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 7, 1881 266,021 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 7, 1881 263,144 Mold for Carbonizing Incandescents . Sept. 19, 1881 265,774 Maintaining Temperatures in Webermeters. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 21, 1881 264,648 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Sept. 23, 1881 265,776 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . Sept. 27, 1881 524,136 Regulator for Dynamo Electrical Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 27, 1881 273,715 Malleableizing Iron. . . . . . . . . . Oct. 4, 1881 281,352 Webermeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1881 446,667 Locomotives for Electric Railways. . .Oct. 11, 1881 288,318 Regulator for Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1881 263,148 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Oct. 25, 1881 264,646 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machines. Oct. 25, 1881 251,559 Electrical Drop Light. . . . . . . . .Oct. 25, 1881 266,793 Electric Distribution System . . . . .Oct. 25, 1881 358,599 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 29, 1881 264,673 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machine. Nov. 3, 1881 263,138 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 7, 1881 265,775 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 7 1881 297,580 Electric Arc Light . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 7 1881 263,146 Dynamo Magneto Electric Machines . . .Nov. 22, 1881 266,588 Vacuum Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 25, 1881 251,536 Vacuum Pump. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,650 Manufacturing Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,660 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 379,770 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 293,434 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 439,391 Junction Box for Electric Wires. . . . Dec. 5, 1881 454,558 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1881 264,653 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1881 358,600 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 13, 1881 264,652 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1881 278,419 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1881 1882 265,779 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1882 264,654 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,661 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Feb. 10, 1882 264,664 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Feb. 10, 1882 264,668 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,669 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,671 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 275,613 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 401,646 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 10, 1882 264,658 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 264,659 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 265,780 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 265,781 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 278,416 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 379,771 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 28, 1882 272,034 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 274,576 Transmitting Telephone . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 274,577 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 30, 1882 264,662 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,663 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,665 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 264,666 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 268,205 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 273,488 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 1, 1882 273,492 Secondary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . May 19, 1882 460,122 Process of and Apparatus for Generating Electricity . . . . . . . . May 19, 1882 466,460 Electrolytic Decomposition . . . . . .May 19,. 1882 264,672 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 264,667 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 265,786 Apparatus for Electrical Transmission of Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 273,828 System of Underground Conductors of Electric Distribution. . . . . . . . . May 22, 1882 379,772 System of Electrical Distribution. . . May 22, 1882 274,292 Secondary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1882 281,353 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . June 3, 1882 287,523 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . . June 3, 1882 365,509 Filament for Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 3 1882 446,668 Electric Are Light . . . . . . . . . . .June 3 1882 543,985 Incandescent Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 3, 1882 264,651 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . June 9, 1882 264,655 Incandescing Electric Lamps. . . . . . June 9, 1882 264,670 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 9, 1882 273,489 Turn-Table for Electric Railway. . . . June 9, 1882 273,490 Electro Magnetic Railway System. . . . June 9, 1882 401,486 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 12, 1882 476,527 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 12, 1882 439,390 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .June 19, 1882 446,666 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 19, 1882 464,822 System of Distributing Electricity . .June 19, 1882 304,082 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . .June 24, 1882 274,296 Manufacture of Incandescents . . . . . July 5, 1882 264,656 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . July 7, 1882 265,782 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,783 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,784 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines July 7, 1882 265,785 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 273,494 Electrical Railroad. . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 278,418 Translating Electric Currents from High to Low Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 293,435 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 334,853 Mold for Carbonizing . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 339,278 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . . July 7, 1882 273,714 Magnetic Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 282,287 Magnetic Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 448,778 Electric Railway . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 5, 1882 439,392 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .Aug. 12, 1882 271,613 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 287,518 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 406,825 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 439,393 Carbonizing Chamber. . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1882 273,487 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines Sept. 12, 1882 297,581 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 12, 1882 395,962 Manufacturing Electric Lamps . . . . Sept. 16, 1882 287,525 Regulator for Systems of Electrical Distribution—Edison and C. L. Clarke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 4, 1882 365,465 Valve Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 5, 1882 317,631 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1882 307,029 Filament for Incandescent Lamp . . . . Oct. 9, 1882 268,206 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 10, 1882 273,486 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . .Oct. 12, 1882 274,293 Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 275,612 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 430,932 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 14, 1882 271,616 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1882 543,986 Process for Treating Products Derived from Vegetable Fibres. . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1882 543,987 Filament for Incandescent Lamps. . . .Oct. 17, 1882 271,614 Shafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 271,615 Governor for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,491 Regulator for Driving Engines of Electrical Generators. . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,493 Valve Gear for Electrical Generator Engines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 411,016 Manufacturing Carbon Filaments . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 492,150 Coating Conductors for Incandescent Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 19, 1882 273,485 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 317,632 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 317,633 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1882 287,520 Incandescing Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 3, 1882 353,783 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . Nov. 3, 1882 430,933 Filament for Incandescent Lamps. . . . Nov. 3, 1882 274,294 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1882 281,350 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1882 274,295 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Nov. 14, 1882 276,233 Electrical Generator and Motor . . . .Nov. 14, 1882 274,290 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 20, 1882 274,291 Mold for Carbonizer. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 278,413 Regulator for Dynamo Electric MachinesNov. 28, 1882 278,414 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 287,519 Manufacturing Incandescing Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 287,524 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 438,298 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1882 276,232 Operating and Regulating Electrical Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 20, 1882 1883 278,415 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 278,417 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 281,349 Regulator for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 283,985 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Jan. 13 1883 283,986 System o' Electrical Distribution. . . Jan. 13 1883 459,835 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1883 13,940 Design Patent—Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 13 1883 280,727 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Feb. 13 1883 395,123 Circuit Controller for Dynamo Machine.Feb. 13, 1883 287,521 Dynamo or Magneto Electric Machine . .Feb. 17, 1883 287,522 Molds for Carbonizing. . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 438,299 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Feb. 17, 1883 446,669 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 476,528 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1883 281,351 Electrical Generator . . . . . . . . .March 5, 1883 283,984 System of Electrical Distribution. . .March 5, 1883 287,517 System of Electrical Distribution. . .March 14,1883 283,983 System of Electrical Distribution. . .April 5, 1883 354,310 Manufacture of Carbon Conductors . . .April 6, 1883 370,123 Electric Meter . . . . . . . . . . . .April 6, 1883 411,017 Carbonizing Flask. . . . . . . . . . .April 6, 1883 370,124 Manufacture of Filament for Incandescing Electric Lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . April 12, 1883 287,516 System of Electrical Distribution. . . .May 8, 1883 341,839 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . .May 8, 1883 398,774 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . .May 8, 1883 370,125 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,126 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,127 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,128 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,129 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,130 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 370,131 Electrical Transmission of Power . . . June 1, 1883 438,300 Gauge for Testing Fibres for Incandescent Lamp Carbons. . . . . . . June 1, 1883 287,511 Electric Regulator . . . . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,512 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,513 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,514 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 287,515 System of Electrical Distribution. . .June 25, 1883 297,582 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 328,572 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machines June 25, 1883 430,934 Electric Lighting System . . . . . . .June 25, 1883 438,301 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .June 25, 1883 297,583 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 304,083 Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . .July 27; 1883 304,084 Device for Protecting Electric Light Systems from Lightning . . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 438,302 Commutator for Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1883 476,529 System of Electrical Distribution. . .July 27, 1883 297,584 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . . Aug. 8, 1883 307,030 Electrical Meter . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 8, 1883 297,585 Incandescing Conductor for Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 297,586 Electrical Conductor . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 435,688 Process and Apparatus for Generating Electricity. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 470,922 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Lamps . . . . . . . . . Sept. 14, 1883 490,953 Generating Electricity . . . . . . . . Oct. 9, 1883 293,432 Electrical Generator or Motor. . . . .Oct. 17, 1883 307,031 Electrical Indicator . . . . . . . . . Nov. 2, 1883 337,254 Telephone—Edison and Bergmann . . . .Nov. 10, 1883 297,587 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1883 298,954 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 15, 1883 298,955 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Nov. 15, 1883 304,085 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 15, 1883 509,517 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 15, 1883 425,761 Incandescent Lamp. . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 20, 1883 304,086 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . .Dec. 15, 1883 1884 298,956 Operating Dynamo Electric Machine. . . Jan. 5, 1884 304,087 Electrical Conductor . . . . . . . . .Jan. 12, 1884 395,963 Incandescent Lamp Filament . . . . . .Jan. 22, 1884 526,147 Plating One Material with Another. . .Jan. 22, 1884 339,279 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Feb. 8, 1884 314,115 Chemical Stock Quotation Telegraph— Edison and Kenny . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 9, 1884 436,968 Method and Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1884 436,969 Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . June 2, 1884 438,303 Arc Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 2, 1884 343,017 System of Electrical Distribution. . .June 27, 1884 391,595 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . .July 16, 1884 328,573 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 328,574 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 328,575 System of Electric Lighting. . . . . Sept. 12, 1884 391,596 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 24, 1884 438,304 Electric Signalling Apparatus. . . . Sept. 24, 1884 422,577 Apparatus for Speaking Telephones— Edison and Gilliland . . . . . . . . .Oct. 21, 1884 329,030 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 3, 1884 422,578 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 422,579 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 340,707 Telephonic Repeater. . . . . . . . . . Dec. 9, 1884 340,708 Electrical Signalling Apparatus. . . .Dec. 19, 1884 347,097 Electrical Signalling Apparatus. . . .Dec. 19, 1884 478,743 Telephone Repeater . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 31, 1884 1885 340,709 Telephone Circuit—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jan. 2, 1885 378,044 Telephone Transmitter. . . . . . . . . Jan. 9, 1885 348,114 Electrode for Telephone Transmitters .Jan. 12, 1885 438,305 Fuse Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 14, 1885 350,234 System of Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 27,1885 486,634 System of Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . .March 27,1885 333,289 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 27, 1885 333,290 Duplex Telegraphy. . . . . . . . . . April 30, 1885 333,291 Way Station Quadruplex Telegraph . . . .May 6, 1885 465,971 Means for Transmitting Signals Electrically May 14, 1885 422 072 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1885 437 422 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct. 7, 1885 422,073 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. I 2, 1885 422,074 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 24, 1885 435,689 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 30, 1885 438,306 Telephone - Edison and Gilliland . . .Dec. 22, 1885 350,235 Railway Telegraphy—Edison and Gilliland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 28, 1885 1886 406,567 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 28, 1886 474,232 Speaking Telegraph . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 17, 1886 370 132 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 11, 1886 411,018 Manufacture of Incandescent Lamps. . .July 15, 1886 438,307 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July I 5, 1886 448,779 Telegraph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July IS, 1886 411,019 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1886 406,130 Manufacture of Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 6, 1886 351,856 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . Sept. 30, 1886 454,262 Incandescent Lamp Filaments. . . . . .Oct. 26, 1886 466,400 Cut-Out for Incandescent Lamps—Edison and J. F. Ott. . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 26, 1886 484,184 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Oct. 26, 1886 490,954 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments for Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 2, 1886 438,308 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 9, 1886 524,378 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 9, 1886 365,978 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 22, 1886 369 439 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Nov. 22, 1886 384 830 Railway Signalling—Edison and Gilliland Nov. 24, 1886 379,944 Commutator for Dynamo Electric MachinesNov. 26, 1886 411,020 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Nov. 26, 1886 485,616 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . .Dec 6, 1886 485,615 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . .Dec 6, 1886 525,007 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . . Dec. 6, 1886 369,441 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 10, 1886 369,442 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 16, 1886 369,443 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Dec. 16, 1886 484,185 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Dec. 20, 1886 534,207 Manufacture of Carbon Filaments. . . .Dec. 20, 1886 373,584 Dynamo Electric Machine. . . . . . . .Dec. 21, 1886 1887 468,949 Converter System for Electric Railways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 7, 1887 380,100 Pyromagnetic Motor . . . . . . . . . . May 24, 1887 476,983 Pyromagnetic Generator . . . . . . . . .May 24 1887 476,530 Incandescent Electric Lamp . . . . . . June 1, 1887 377,518 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .June 30, 1887 470,923 Railway Signalling . . . . . . . . . . Aug. 9, 1887 545,405 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Aug. 26, 1887 380,101 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Sept. 13 1887 380,102 System of Electrical Distribution. . .Sept. 14 1887 470,924 Electric Conductor . . . . . . . . . Sept. 26, 1887 563,462 Method of and Apparatus for Drawing Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 17, 1887 385,173 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Nov. 5, 1887 506,215 Making Plate Glass . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 9, 1887 382,414 Burnishing Attachments for PhonographsNov. 22, 1887 386,974 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 22, 1887 430,570 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 22, 1887 382,416 Feed and Return Mechanism for PhonographsNov. 29, 1887 382,415 System of Electrical Distribution. . . Dec. 4, 1887 382,462 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 5, 1887 1888 484,582 Duplicating Phonograms . . . . . . . .Jan. 17, 1888 434,586 Electric Generator . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1888 434,587 Thermo Electric Battery. . . . . . . .Jan. 21, 1888 382,417 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . .Jan. 30, 1888 389,369 Incandescing Electric Lamp . . . . . . Feb. 2, 1888 382,418 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 390,462 Making Carbon Filaments. . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 394,105 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 394,106 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . .Feb. 20, 1888 382,419 Duplicating Phonograms . . . . . . . .March 3, 1888 425,762 Cut-Out for Incandescent Lamps . . . .March 3, 1888 396,356 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .March 19,1888 393,462 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . April 28, 1888 393,463 Machine for Making Phonogram Blanks. April 28, 1888 393,464 Machine for Making Phonogram Blanks. April 28, 1888 534,208 Induction Converter. . . . . . . . . . .May 7, 1888 476,991 Method of and Apparatus for Separating Ores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .May 9, 1888 400,646 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . . May 22, 1888 488,190 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . . May 22, 1888 488,189 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 26, 1888 470,925 Manufacture of Filaments for Incandescent Electric Lamps . . . . . . . . . . . .June 21, 1888 393,465 Preparing Phonograph Recording Surfaces June 30, 1888 400,647 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 30, 1888 448,780 Device for Turning Off Phonogram Blanks June 30, 1888 393,466 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 393,966 Recording and Reproducing Sounds . . .July 14, 1888 393,967 Recording and Reproducing Sounds . . .July 14, 1888 430,274 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 437,423 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 450,740 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .July 14, 1888 485,617 Incandescent Lamp Filament . . . . . .July 14, 1888 448,781 Turning-Off Device for Phonographs . .July 16, 1888 400,648 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1888 499,879 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 27, 1888 397,705 Winding Field Magnets. . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1888 435,690 Making Armatures for Dynamo Electric Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 31, 1888 430,275 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . Sept. 12, 1888 474,591 Extracting Gold from Sulphide Ores . Sept. 12, 1888 397,280 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . Sept. 19, 1888 397,706 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 29, 1888 400,649 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . Sept. 29, 1888 400,650 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 406,568 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 437,424 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 15, 1888 393,968 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1888 1889 406,569 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 10, 1889 488,191 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 10, 1889 430,276 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 12, 1889 406,570 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,571 Treating Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,572 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,573 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,574 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,575 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 406,576 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 430,277 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 437,425 Phonograph Recorder. . . . . . . . . . Feb. 1, 1889 414,759 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . March 22, 1889 414,760 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 22, 1889 462,540 Incandescent Electric Lamps. . . . . March 22, 1889 430,278 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 8, 1889 438,309 Insulating Electrical Conductors . . April 25, 1889 423,039 Phonograph Doll or Other Toys. . . . .June 15, 1889 426,527 Automatic Determining Device for Phonographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1889 430,279 Voltaic Battery. . . . . . . . . . . .June 15, 1889 506,216 Apparatus for Making Glass . . . . . .June 29, 1889 414,761 Phonogram Blanks . . . . . . . . . . .July 16, 1889 430,280 Magnetic Separator . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1889 437,426 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1889 465,972 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 14, 1889 443,507 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 11 1889 513,095 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 11 1889 1890 434,588 Magnetic Ore Separator—Edison and W. K. L. Dickson . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 16, 1890 437,427 Making Phonogram Blanks. . . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1890 465,250 Extracting Copper Pyrites. . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1890 434,589 Propelling Mechanism for Electric Vehicles Feb. 14, 1890 438,310 Lamp Base. . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 25, 1890 437,428 Propelling Device for Electric Cars. April 29, 1890 437,429 Phonogram Blank. . . . . . . . . . . April 29, 1890 454,941 Phonograph Recorder and Reproducer . . .May 6, 1890 436,127 Electric Motor . . . . . . . . . . . . May 17, 1890 484,583 Phonograph Cutting Tool. . . . . . . . May 24, 1890 484,584 Phonograph Reproducer. . . . . . . . . May 24, 1890 436,970 Apparatus for Transmitting Power . . . June 2, 1890 453,741 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 454,942 Phonograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 5, 1890 456,301 Phonograph Doll. . . . . . . . . . .
1902 734,522 Process of Nickel-Plating. . . . . . .Feb. 11, 1902 727,117 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . Sept. 29, 1902 727,118 Manufacturing Electrolytically Active Finely Divided Iron. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 13, 1902 721,682 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 721,870 Funnel for Filling Storage Battery Jars Nov. 13, 1902 723,449 Electrode for Storage Batteries. . . .Nov. 13, 1902 723,450 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,755 Compressing Dies . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,858 Storage Battery Tray . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,859 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 764,183 Separating Mechanically Entrained Globules from Gases. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 802,631 Apparatus for Burning Portland Cement Clinker. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 852,424 Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 722,502 Handling Cable Drawn Cars on Inclines. Dec. 18, 1902 724,089 Operating Motors in Dust Laden Atmospheres. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 750,102 Electrical Automobile. . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 758,432 Stock House Conveyor . . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 873,219 Feed Regulators for Grinding Machines. Dec. 18, 1902 832,046 Automatic Weighing and Mixing Apparatus Dec. 18, 1902 1903 772,647 Photographic Film for Moving Picture Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1903 841,677 Apparatus for Separating and Grinding Fine Materials . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 22, 1903 790,351 Duplicating Phonograph Records . . . .Jan. 30. 1903 831,269 Storage Battery Electrode Plate. . . .Jan. 30, 1903 775,965 Dry Separator. . . . . . . . . . . . April 27, 1903 754,756 Process of Treating Ores from Magnetic Gangue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 25, 1903 775,600 Rotary Cement Kilns. . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1903 767,216 Apparatus for Vacuously Depositing Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 30 1903 796,629 Lamp Guard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 30 1903 772,648 Vehicle Wheel. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1903 850,912 Making Articles by Electro-Plating . . .Oct 3, 1903 857,041 Can or Receptacle for Storage Batteries.Oct 3, 1903 766,815 Primary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1903 943,664 Sound Recording Apparatus. . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1903 873,220 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 20, 1903 898,633 Filling Apparatus for Storage Battery Jars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 8, 1903 1904 767,554 Rendering Storage Battery Gases Non- Explosive. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8, 1904 861,241 Portland Cement and Manufacturing Same June 20, 1904 800,800 Phonograph Records and Making Same . .June 24, 1904 821,622 Cleaning Metallic Surfaces . . . . . .June 24, 1904 879,612 Alkaline Storage Batteries . . . . . .June 24, 1904 880,484 Process of Producing Very Thin Sheet Metal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 24, 1904 827,297 Alkaline Batteries . . . . . . . . . .July 12, 1904 797,845 Sheet Metal for Perforated Pockets of Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . .July 12, 1904 847,746 Electrical Welding Apparatus . . . . .July 12, 1904 821,032 Storage Battery. . . . . . . . . . . . Aug 10, 1904 861,242 Can or Receptacle for Storage Battery. Aug 10, 1904 970,615 Methods and Apparatus for Making Sound Records. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 23, 1904 817,162 Treating Alkaline Storage Batteries. Sept. 26, 1904 948,542 Method of Treating Cans of Alkaline Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . Sept. 28, 1904 813,490 Cement Kiln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct 29, 1904 821,625 Treating Alkaline Storage Batteries. . Oct 29, 1904 821,623 Storage Battery Filling Apparatus. . . Nov. 1, 1904 821,624 Gas Separator for Storage Battery. . .Oct. 29, 1904 1905 879,859 Apparatus for Producing Very Thin Sheet Metal. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 16, 1905 804,799 Apparatus for Perforating Sheet Metal March 17, 1905 870,024 Apparatus for Producing Perforated Strips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 23, 1905 882,144 Secondary Battery Electrodes . . . . March 29, 1905 821,626 Process of Making Metallic Films or Flakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 821,627 Making Metallic Flakes or Scales . . .March 29,1905 827,717 Making Composite Metal . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 839,371 Coating Active Material with Flake-like Conducting Material. . . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 854,200 Making Storage Battery Electrodes. . .March 29,1905 857,929 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . March 29, 1905 860,195 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . April 26, 1905 862,145 Process of Making Seamless Tubular Pockets or Receptacles for Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . . . . . April 26, 1905 839,372 Phonograph Records or Blanks . . . . April 28, 1905 813,491 Pocket Filling Machine . . . . . . . . May 15, 1905 821,628 Making Conducting Films. . . . . . . . May 20, 1905 943,663 Horns for Talking Machines . . . . . . May 20, 1905 950 226 Phonograph Recording Apparatus . . . . May 20, 1905 785 297 Gas Separator for Storage Batteries. .July 18, 1905 950,227 Apparatus for Making Metallic Films or Flakes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 10, 1905 936,433 Tube Filling and Tamping Machine . . .Oct. 12, 1905 967,178 Tube Forming Machines—Edison and John F. Ott. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1905 880,978 Electrode Elements for Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1905 880,979 Method of Making Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1905 850,913 Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . . Dec. 6, 1905 914,342 Storage Battery. . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 6, 1905 1906 858,862 Primary and Secondary Batteries. . . . Jan. 9, 1906 850,881 Composite Metal. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1906 964,096 Processes of Electro-Plating . . . . .Feb. 24, 1906 914,372 Making Thin Metallic Flakes. . . . . .July 13, 1906 962,822 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 4, 1906 923,633 Shaft Coupling . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 11, 1906 962,823 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 11, 1906 930,946 Apparatus for Burning Portland Cement. Oct. 22,1906 898 404 Making Articles by Electro-Plating . . Nov. 2, 1906 930,948 Apparatus for Burning Portland Cement.Nov. 16, 1906 930,949 Apparatus for Burning Portland Cement. Nov. 26 1906 890,625 Apparatus for Grinding Coal. . . . . . Nov, 33 1906 948,558 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1906 964,221 Sound Records. . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 28, 1906 1907 865,688 Making Metallic Films or Flakes. . . .Jan. 11, 1907 936,267 Feed Mechanism for Phonographs and Other Machines . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 11, 1907 936,525 Making Metallic Films or Flakes. . . .Jan. 17, 1907 865,687 Making Nickel Films. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1907 939,817 Cement Kiln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1907 855,562 Diaphragm for Talking Machines . . . .Feb. 23, 1907 939,992 Phonographic Recording and Reproducing Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 25, 1907 941,630 Process and Apparatus for Artificially Aging or Seasoning Portland Cement . .Feb. 25, 1907 876,445 Electrolyte for Alkaline Storage Batteries May 8, 1907 914,343 Making Storage Battery Electrodes. . . May 15, 1907 861,819 Discharging Apparatus for Belt Conveyors June 11, 1907 954,789 Sprocket Chain Drives. . . . . . . . .June 11, 1907 909,877 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 18, 1907 1908 896,811 Metallic Film for Use with Storage Batteries and Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 4, 1908 940,635 Electrode Element for Storage Batteries Feb. 4, 1908 909,167 Water-Proofing Paint for Portland Cement Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 4, 1908 896,812 Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . March 13, 1908 944,481 Processes and Apparatus for Artificially Aging or Seasoning Portland Cement. March 13,1908 947,806 Automobiles. . . . . . . . . . . . . March 13,-1908 909,168 Water-Proofing Fibres and Fabrics. . . May 27, 1908 909,169 Water-Proofing Paint for Portland Cement Structures. . . . . . . . . . . May 27, 1908 970,616 Flying Machines. . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 20, 1908 1909 930,947 Gas Purifier . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 15, 1909 40,527 Design Patent for Phonograph Cabinet. Sept. 13, 1909
1902 734,522 Nickel-Plating Process. . . . . . .Feb. 11, 1902 727,117 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . Sept. 29, 1902 727,118 Manufacturing Electrolytically Active Finely Divided Iron. . . . . . . . . .Oct. 13, 1902 721,682 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 721,870 Funnel for Filling Storage Battery Jars Nov. 13, 1902 723,449 Electrode for Storage Batteries. . . .Nov. 13, 1902 723,450 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,755 Compression Dies . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,858 Storage Battery Tray . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 754,859 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 764,183 Mechanically Separating Entrained Globules from Gases. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 802,631 Device for Burning Portland Cement Clinker. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 852,424 Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . .Nov. 13, 1902 722,502 Handling Cable-Drawn Cars on Inclines. Dec. 18, 1902 724,089 Operating Motors in Dusty Environments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 750,102 Electric Car. . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 758,432 Stock House Conveyor . . . . . . . . .Dec. 18, 1902 873,219 Feed Regulators for Grinding Machines. Dec. 18, 1902 832,046 Automatic Weighing and Mixing Device Dec. 18, 1902 1903 772,647 Photographic Film for Motion Picture Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 13, 1903 841,677 Device for Separating and Grinding Fine Materials . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 22, 1903 790,351 Duplicating Phonograph Records . . . .Jan. 30. 1903 831,269 Storage Battery Electrode Plate. . . .Jan. 30, 1903 775,965 Dry Separator. . . . . . . . . . . . April 27, 1903 754,756 Ore Treatment Process from Magnetic Gangue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 25, 1903 775,600 Rotary Cement Kilns. . . . . . . . . .July 20, 1903 767,216 Device for Vacuum Metal Deposition . .July 30, 1903 796,629 Lamp Guard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 30, 1903 772,648 Vehicle Wheel. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 25, 1903 850,912 Creating Items through Electroplating . .Oct 3, 1903 857,041 Container for Storage Batteries.Oct 3, 1903 766,815 Primary Battery. . . . . . . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1903 943,664 Sound Recording Device. . . . . . . .Nov. 16, 1903 873,220 Reversible Galvanic Battery. . . . . .Nov. 20, 1903 898,633 Filling Device for Storage Battery Jars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 8, 1903 1904 767,554 Making Storage Battery Gases Safe from Explosions. . . . . . . . . . . .June 8, 1904 861,241 Portland Cement and Its Production June 20, 1904 800,800 Phonograph Records and Their Production . .June 24, 1904 821,622 Cleaning Metal Surfaces . . . . . .June 24, 1904 879,612 Alkaline Storage Batteries . . . . . .June 24, 1904 880,484 Process for Producing Ultra-Thin Sheet Metal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 24, 1904 827,297 Alkaline Batteries . . . . . . . . . .July 12, 1904 797,845 Sheet Metal for Perforated Storage Battery Pockets. . . . . . . . . . .July 12, 1904 847,746 Electrical Welding Device . . . . .July 12, 1904 821,032 Storage Battery. . . . . . . . . . . . Aug 10, 1904 861,242 Container for Storage Battery. Aug 10, 1904 970,615 Techniques and Device for Making Sound Records. . . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 23, 1904 817,162 Treatment of Alkaline Storage Batteries. Sept. 26, 1904 948,542 Cans Treatment Method for Alkaline Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . Sept. 28, 1904 813,490 Cement Kiln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct 29, 1904 821,625 Treatment of Alkaline Storage Batteries. .Oct 29, 1904 821,623 Storage Battery Filling Device. . . Nov. 1, 1904 821,624 Gas Separator for Storage Battery. . .Oct. 29, 1904 1905 879,859 Device for Producing Ultra-Thin Sheet Metal. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 16, 1905 804,799 Device for Perforating Sheet Metal March 17, 1905 870,024 Device for Creating Perforated Strips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 23, 1905 882,144 Electrodes for Secondary Batteries . . March 29, 1905 821,626 Process for Making Metallic Films or Flakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 821,627 Producing Metallic Flakes or Scales . .March 29,1905 827,717 Making Composite Metal . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 839,371 Coating Active Material with Flake-like Conductive Material. . . . . . . . . .March 29,1905 854,200 Making Electrodes for Storage Batteries. . .March 29,1905 857,929 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . March 29, 1905 860,195 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . April 26, 1905 862,145 Process of Creating Seamless Tubular Pockets or Receptacles for Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . . . . . April 26, 1905 839,372 Phonograph Records or Blanks . . . . April 28, 1905 813,491 Pocket Filling Device . . . . . . . . May 15, 1905 821,628 Creating Conductive Films. . . . . . . . May 20, 1905 943,663 Horns for Talking Machines . . . . . . May 20, 1905 950 226 Phonograph Recording Device . . . . May 20, 1905 785 297 Gas Separator for Storage Batteries. .July 18, 1905 950,227 Device for Making Metallic Films or Flakes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 10, 1905 936,433 Tube Filling and Tamping Device . . .Oct. 12, 1905 967,178 Tube Forming Devices—Edison and John F. Ott. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 16, 1905 880,978 Electrode Elements for Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1905 880,979 Storage Battery Electrode Making Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Oct. 31, 1905 850,913 Secondary Batteries. . . . . . . . . . Dec. 6, 1905 914,342 Storage Battery. . . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 6, 1905 1906 858,862 Primary and Secondary Batteries. . . . Jan. 9, 1906 850,881 Composite Metal. . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 19, 1906 964,096 Electro-Plating Processes . . . . .Feb. 24, 1906 914,372 Producing Thin Metallic Flakes. . . . . .July 13, 1906 962,822 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . .Sept. 4, 1906 923,633 Shaft Coupling . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 11, 1906 962,823 Crushing Rolls . . . . . . . . . . . Sept. 11, 1906 930,946 Device for Burning Portland Cement. Oct. 22,1906 898 404 Creating Items by Electro-Plating . . Nov. 2, 1906 930,948 Device for Burning Portland Cement.Nov. 16, 1906 930,949 Device for Burning Portland Cement. Nov. 26 1906 890,625 Device for Grinding Coal. . . . . . Nov. 33 1906 948,558 Storage Battery Electrodes . . . . . .Nov. 28, 1906 964,221 Sound Records. . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec. 28, 1906 1907 865,688 Creating Metallic Films or Flakes. . . .Jan. 11, 1907 936,267 Feed Mechanism for Phonographs and Other Devices . . . . . . . . . . . .Jan. 11, 1907 936,525 Creating Metallic Films or Flakes. . . .Jan. 17, 1907 865,687 Producing Nickel Films. . . . . . . . . .Jan. 18, 1907 939,817 Cement Kiln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 8, 1907 855,562 Diaphragm for Talking Machines . . . .Feb. 23, 1907 939,992 Phonographic Recording and Reproducing Machine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 25, 1907 941,630 Process and Device for Artificially Aging or Curing Portland Cement . .Feb. 25, 1907 876,445 Electrolyte for Alkaline Storage Batteries May 8, 1907 914,343 Making Storage Battery Electrodes. . . May 15, 1907 861,819 Discharging Device for Belt Conveyors June 11, 1907 954,789 Sprocket Chain Drives. . . . . . . . .June 11, 1907 909,877 Telegraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .June 18, 1907 1908 896,811 Metallic Film for Use with Storage Batteries and Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 4, 1908 940,635 Electrode Element for Storage Batteries Feb. 4, 1908 909,167 Waterproof Paint for Portland Cement Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . Feb. 4, 1908 896,812 Storage Batteries. . . . . . . . . . March 13, 1908 944,481 Processes and Devices for Artificially Aging or Curing Portland Cement. March 13,1908 947,806 Automobiles. . . . . . . . . . . . . March 13, 1908 909,168 Waterproof Fibres and Fabrics. . . May 27, 1908 909,169 Waterproof Paint for Portland Cement Structures. . . . . . . . . . . May 27, 1908 970,616 Flying Machines. . . . . . . . . . . .Aug. 20, 1908 1909 930,947 Gas Purifier . . . . . . . . . . . . .Feb. 15, 1909 40,527 Design Patent for Phonograph Cabinet. Sept. 13, 1909
FOREIGN PATENTS
In addition to the United States patents issued to Edison, as above enumerated, there have been granted to him (up to October, 1910) by foreign governments 1239 patents, as follows:
In addition to the United States patents granted to Edison, as listed above, he has received 1239 patents from foreign governments (up to October 1910), as follows:
Argentine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Australia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Austria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 Belgium. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129 Cape of Good Hope. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Ceylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Cuba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Denmark. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130 Great Britain. . . . . . . . . . . . . .131 Hungary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 India. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Italy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Japan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Natal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 New South Wales. . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 New Zealand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Norway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Orange Free State. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Queensland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 South African Republic . . . . . . . . . .4 South Australia. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Spain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Switzerland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Tasmania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Victoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 West Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Total of Edison's Foreign Patents. . . 1239
Argentina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Australia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Austria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 Belgium. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129 Cape of Good Hope. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Ceylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Cuba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Denmark. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130 Great Britain. . . . . . . . . . . . . .131 Hungary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 India. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Italy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Japan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Natal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 New South Wales. . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 New Zealand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Norway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Orange Free State. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Queensland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 South African Republic . . . . . . . . . .4 South Australia. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Spain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Switzerland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Tasmania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Victoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 West Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Total of Edison's Foreign Patents. . . 1239
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!