This is a modern-English version of History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 3, originally written by Gibbon, Edward.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE
Edward Gibbon, Esq.
With notes by the Rev. H. H. Milman
Vol. 3
1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised)
CONTENTS
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV Part V.Death Of Gratian.—Ruin Of Arianism.—St. Ambrose.— First Civil War, Against Maximus.—Character, Administration, And Penance Of Theodosius.—Death Of Valentinian II.—Second Civil War, Against Eugenius.— Death Of Theodosius.
Chapter XXVIII: Destruction Of Paganism.—Part I. Part II. Part III.Final Destruction Of Paganism.—Introduction Of The Worship Of Saints, And Relics, Among The Christians.
Chapter XXIX: Division Of Roman Empire Between Sons Of Theodosius.—Part I. Part II.Final Division Of The Roman Empire Between The Sons Of Theodosius.—Reign Of Arcadius And Honorius— Administration Of Rufinus And Stilicho.—Revolt And Defeat Of Gildo In Africa.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV. Part V.Revolt Of The Goths.—They Plunder Greece.—Two Great Invasions Of Italy By Alaric And Radagaisus.—They Are Repulsed By Stilicho.—The Germans Overrun Gaul.—Usurpation Of Constantine In The West.—Disgrace And Death Of Stilicho.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV. Part V. Part VI. Part VII.Invasion Of Italy By Alaric.—Manners Of The Roman Senate And People.—Rome Is Thrice Besieged, And At Length Pillaged, By The Goths.—Death Of Alaric.—The Goths Evacuate Italy.—Fall Of Constantine.—Gaul And Spain Are Occupied By The Barbarians.—Independence Of Britain.
Chapter XXXII: Emperors Arcadius, Eutropius, Theodosius II.—Part I. Part II. Part III.Arcadius Emperor Of The East.—Administration And Disgrace Of Eutropius.—Revolt Of Gainas.—Persecution Of St. John Chrysostom.—Theodosius II. Emperor Of The East.—His Sister Pulcheria.—His Wife Eudocia.—The Persian War, And Division Of Armenia.
Chapter XXXIII: Conquest Of Africa By The Vandals.—Part I. Part II.Death Of Honorius.—Valentinian III.—Emperor Of The East.— Administration Of His Mother Placidia—Ætius And Boniface.— Conquest Of Africa By The Vandals.
Chapter XXXIV: Attila.—Part I. Part II. Part III.The Character, Conquests, And Court Of Attila, King Of The Huns.—Death Of Theodosius The Younger.—Elevation Of Marcian To The Empire Of The East.
Chapter XXXV: Invasion By Attila.—Part I. Part II. Part III.Invasion Of Gaul By Attila.—He Is Repulsed By Ætius And The Visigoths.—Attila Invades And Evacuates Italy.—The Deaths Of Attila, Ætius, And Valentinian The Third.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV. Part V.Sack Of Rome By Genseric, King Of The Vandals.—His Naval Depredations.—Succession Of The Last Emperors Of The West, Maximus, Avitus, Majorian, Severus, Anthemius, Olybrius, Glycerius, Nepos, Augustulus.—Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Reign Of Odoacer, The First Barbarian King Of Italy.
Chapter XXXVII: Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV.Origin Progress, And Effects Of The Monastic Life.— Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity And Arianism.— Persecution Of The Vandals In Africa.—Extinction Of Arianism Among The Barbarians.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV. Part V. Part VI.Reign And Conversion Of Clovis.—His Victories Over The Alemanni, Burgundians, And Visigoths.—Establishment Of The French Monarchy In Gaul.—Laws Of The Barbarians.—State Of The Romans.—The Visigoths Of Spain.—Conquest Of Britain By The Saxons.
CONTENTS
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__Death of Gratian. — Decline of Arianism. — St. Ambrose. — First Civil War against Maximus. — Character, Leadership, and Repentance of Theodosius. — Death of Valentinian II. — Second Civil War against Eugenius. — Death of Theodosius.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__Final Destruction of Paganism. — Introduction of Saint and Relic Worship among Christians.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__Final Division of the Roman Empire among the Sons of Theodosius. — Reign of Arcadius and Honorius — Administration of Rufinus and Stilicho. — Revolt and Defeat of Gildo in Africa.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_13__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_14__Revolt of the Goths. — They plunder Greece. — Two major invasions of Italy by Alaric and Radagaisus. — They are repelled by Stilicho. — The Germans invade Gaul. — Usurpation of Constantine in the West. — Disgrace and death of Stilicho.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_15__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_16__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_17__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_18__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_19__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_20__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_21__Invasion of Italy by Alaric. — Actions of the Roman Senate and People. — Rome is besieged three times, and eventually looted by the Goths. — Death of Alaric. — The Goths leave Italy. — Fall of Constantine. — Gaul and Spain are taken over by the Barbarians. — Independence of Britain.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_22__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_23__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_24__Arcadius, Emperor of the East. — Administration and Disgrace of Eutropius. — Revolt of Gainas. — Persecution of St. John Chrysostom. — Theodosius II, Emperor of the East. — His sister Pulcheria. — His wife Eudocia. — The Persian War and division of Armenia.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_25__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_26__Death of Honorius. — Valentinian III. — Emperor of the East. — Administration of His Mother Placidia. — Ætius and Boniface. — Conquest of Africa by the Vandals.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_27__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_28__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_29__The Character, Conquests, and Court of Attila, King of the Huns. — Death of Theodosius the Younger. — Elevation of Marcian to the Empire of the East.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_30__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_31__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_32__Invasion of Gaul by Attila. — He is pushed back by Ætius and the Visigoths. — Attila invades and retreats from Italy. — The deaths of Attila, Ætius, and Valentinian III.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_33__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_34__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_35__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_36__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_37__Sack of Rome by Genseric, King of the Vandals. — His naval attacks. — The Last Emperors of the West: Maximus, Avitus, Majorian, Severus, Anthemius, Olybrius, Glycerius, Nepos, Augustulus. — Complete end of the Western Empire. — Reign of Odoacer, the First Barbarian King of Italy.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_38__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_39__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_40__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_41__Origin, Progress, and Effects of Monastic Life. — Conversion of the Barbarians to Christianity and Arianism. — Persecution of the Vandals in Africa. — Extinction of Arianism among the Barbarians.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_42__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_43__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_44__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_45__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_46__ __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_47__Reign and Conversion of Clovis. — His victories over the Alemanni, Burgundians, and Visigoths. — Establishment of the French monarchy in Gaul. — Laws of the Barbarians. — State of the Romans. — The Visigoths in Spain. — Conquest of Britain by the Saxons.
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part I.
Death Of Gratian.—Ruin Of Arianism.—St. Ambrose.— First Civil War, Against Maximus.—Character, Administration, And Penance Of Theodosius.—Death Of Valentinian II.—Second Civil War, Against Eugenius.— Death Of Theodosius.
Death of Gratian.—Decline of Arianism.—St. Ambrose.— First Civil War, Against Maximus.—Character, Leadership, and Penance of Theodosius.—Death of Valentinian II.—Second Civil War, Against Eugenius.— Death of Theodosius.
The fame of Gratian, before he had accomplished the twentieth year of his age, was equal to that of the most celebrated princes. His gentle and amiable disposition endeared him to his private friends, the graceful affability of his manners engaged the affection of the people: the men of letters, who enjoyed the liberality, acknowledged the taste and eloquence, of their sovereign; his valor and dexterity in arms were equally applauded by the soldiers; and the clergy considered the humble piety of Gratian as the first and most useful of his virtues. The victory of Colmar had delivered the West from a formidable invasion; and the grateful provinces of the East ascribed the merits of Theodosius to the author of his greatness, and of the public safety. Gratian survived those memorable events only four or five years; but he survived his reputation; and, before he fell a victim to rebellion, he had lost, in a great measure, the respect and confidence of the Roman world.
The fame of Gratian, before he turned twenty, was equal to that of the most renowned princes. His kind and friendly personality endeared him to his close friends, and his charming and approachable manner won the affection of the people. The scholars who benefited from his generosity appreciated his taste and eloquence, while the soldiers praised his bravery and skill in battle. The clergy regarded Gratian's humble piety as his greatest and most valuable virtue. The victory at Colmar had freed the West from a significant invasion, and the grateful provinces in the East credited Theodosius's success to the one who had made it possible and ensured public safety. Gratian lived only four or five years after those remarkable events; however, he didn't maintain his reputation. Before he fell victim to rebellion, he largely lost the respect and trust of the Roman world.
The remarkable alteration of his character or conduct may not be imputed to the arts of flattery, which had besieged the son of Valentinian from his infancy; nor to the headstrong passions which that gentle youth appears to have escaped. A more attentive view of the life of Gratian may perhaps suggest the true cause of the disappointment of the public hopes. His apparent virtues, instead of being the hardy productions of experience and adversity, were the premature and artificial fruits of a royal education. The anxious tenderness of his father was continually employed to bestow on him those advantages, which he might perhaps esteem the more highly, as he himself had been deprived of them; and the most skilful masters of every science, and of every art, had labored to form the mind and body of the young prince. The knowledge which they painfully communicated was displayed with ostentation, and celebrated with lavish praise. His soft and tractable disposition received the fair impression of their judicious precepts, and the absence of passion might easily be mistaken for the strength of reason. His preceptors gradually rose to the rank and consequence of ministers of state: and, as they wisely dissembled their secret authority, he seemed to act with firmness, with propriety, and with judgment, on the most important occasions of his life and reign. But the influence of this elaborate instruction did not penetrate beyond the surface; and the skilful preceptors, who so accurately guided the steps of their royal pupil, could not infuse into his feeble and indolent character the vigorous and independent principle of action which renders the laborious pursuit of glory essentially necessary to the happiness, and almost to the existence, of the hero. As soon as time and accident had removed those faithful counsellors from the throne, the emperor of the West insensibly descended to the level of his natural genius; abandoned the reins of government to the ambitious hands which were stretched forwards to grasp them; and amused his leisure with the most frivolous gratifications. A public sale of favor and injustice was instituted, both in the court and in the provinces, by the worthless delegates of his power, whose merit it was made sacrilege to question. The conscience of the credulous prince was directed by saints and bishops; who procured an Imperial edict to punish, as a capital offence, the violation, the neglect, or even the ignorance, of the divine law. Among the various arts which had exercised the youth of Gratian, he had applied himself, with singular inclination and success, to manage the horse, to draw the bow, and to dart the javelin; and these qualifications, which might be useful to a soldier, were prostituted to the viler purposes of hunting. Large parks were enclosed for the Imperial pleasures, and plentifully stocked with every species of wild beasts; and Gratian neglected the duties, and even the dignity, of his rank, to consume whole days in the vain display of his dexterity and boldness in the chase. The pride and wish of the Roman emperor to excel in an art, in which he might be surpassed by the meanest of his slaves, reminded the numerous spectators of the examples of Nero and Commodus, but the chaste and temperate Gratian was a stranger to their monstrous vices; and his hands were stained only with the blood of animals. The behavior of Gratian, which degraded his character in the eyes of mankind, could not have disturbed the security of his reign, if the army had not been provoked to resent their peculiar injuries. As long as the young emperor was guided by the instructions of his masters, he professed himself the friend and pupil of the soldiers; many of his hours were spent in the familiar conversation of the camp; and the health, the comforts, the rewards, the honors, of his faithful troops, appeared to be the objects of his attentive concern. But, after Gratian more freely indulged his prevailing taste for hunting and shooting, he naturally connected himself with the most dexterous ministers of his favorite amusement. A body of the Alani was received into the military and domestic service of the palace; and the admirable skill, which they were accustomed to display in the unbounded plains of Scythia, was exercised, on a more narrow theatre, in the parks and enclosures of Gaul. Gratian admired the talents and customs of these favorite guards, to whom alone he intrusted the defence of his person; and, as if he meant to insult the public opinion, he frequently showed himself to the soldiers and people, with the dress and arms, the long bow, the sounding quiver, and the fur garments of a Scythian warrior. The unworthy spectacle of a Roman prince, who had renounced the dress and manners of his country, filled the minds of the legions with grief and indignation. Even the Germans, so strong and formidable in the armies of the empire, affected to disdain the strange and horrid appearance of the savages of the North, who, in the space of a few years, had wandered from the banks of the Volga to those of the Seine. A loud and licentious murmur was echoed through the camps and garrisons of the West; and as the mild indolence of Gratian neglected to extinguish the first symptoms of discontent, the want of love and respect was not supplied by the influence of fear. But the subversion of an established government is always a work of some real, and of much apparent, difficulty; and the throne of Gratian was protected by the sanctions of custom, law, religion, and the nice balance of the civil and military powers, which had been established by the policy of Constantine. It is not very important to inquire from what cause the revolt of Britain was produced. Accident is commonly the parent of disorder; the seeds of rebellion happened to fall on a soil which was supposed to be more fruitful than any other in tyrants and usurpers; the legions of that sequestered island had been long famous for a spirit of presumption and arrogance; and the name of Maximus was proclaimed, by the tumultuary, but unanimous voice, both of the soldiers and of the provincials. The emperor, or the rebel,—for this title was not yet ascertained by fortune,—was a native of Spain, the countryman, the fellow-soldier, and the rival of Theodosius whose elevation he had not seen without some emotions of envy and resentment: the events of his life had long since fixed him in Britain; and I should not be unwilling to find some evidence for the marriage, which he is said to have contracted with the daughter of a wealthy lord of Caernarvonshire. But this provincial rank might justly be considered as a state of exile and obscurity; and if Maximus had obtained any civil or military office, he was not invested with the authority either of governor or general. His abilities, and even his integrity, are acknowledged by the partial writers of the age; and the merit must indeed have been conspicuous that could extort such a confession in favor of the vanquished enemy of Theodosius. The discontent of Maximus might incline him to censure the conduct of his sovereign, and to encourage, perhaps, without any views of ambition, the murmurs of the troops. But in the midst of the tumult, he artfully, or modestly, refused to ascend the throne; and some credit appears to have been given to his own positive declaration, that he was compelled to accept the dangerous present of the Imperial purple.
The significant change in his character or behavior can't be blamed on the flattery that surrounded the son of Valentinian from a young age, nor on the intense passions that this gentle young man seems to have avoided. A closer look at Gratian's life might reveal the real reason for the public's disappointment. His apparent virtues, rather than being the strong outcomes of experience and hardship, were the premature and artificial results of a royal upbringing. His father's anxious affection constantly aimed to provide him with advantages that he might value more since he himself had been deprived of them; the most skilled teachers in every field worked hard to develop the mind and body of the young prince. The knowledge they painstakingly shared was displayed boastfully and celebrated with extravagant praise. His soft and compliant nature absorbed their wise teachings, and the lack of strong emotions could easily be mistaken for the strength of reason. His teachers gradually gained the status and influence of government ministers; and, as they wisely concealed their true authority, he appeared to act with determination, propriety, and judgment during the most critical moments of his life and reign. However, the effects of this intense training didn't go deep below the surface; the skilled teachers who carefully guided their royal pupil couldn't instill in his weak and lazy character the robust and independent drive necessary to make the challenging pursuit of glory vital for the hero's happiness, and almost for his very existence. Once time and circumstance had removed those loyal advisors from power, the emperor of the West gradually lowered himself to his natural abilities, handed over control of the government to the ambitious individuals eager to seize it, and spent his leisure time indulging in trivial pleasures. A public auction of favoritism and injustice was set up, both at court and in the provinces, by his worthless representatives, whose merit it became forbidden to question. The credulous prince's conscience was steered by saints and bishops, who got an Imperial decree issued to punish the violation, neglect, or even ignorance of divine law as a capital offense. Among the various skills that occupied Gratian's youth, he had developed a strong inclination and success in managing horses, archery, and javelin throwing; however, these skills, which might have been useful for a soldier, were wasted on the more ignoble pursuits of hunting. Large parks were enclosed for the Emperor's enjoyment, stocked abundantly with every kind of wild animal; Gratian neglected the responsibilities, and even the dignity, of his rank to spend entire days showcasing his skill and courage in the hunt. The Roman emperor's pride and desire to excel in a skill where even the lowest of his slaves could outdo him reminded many witnesses of Nero and Commodus, but the chaste and moderate Gratian was innocent of their monstrous vices; his hands were stained only with the blood of animals. Gratian's actions, which diminished his reputation in the eyes of others, would not have undermined the security of his reign had the army not been stirred to resent their unique grievances. As long as the young emperor followed the guidance of his teachers, he presented himself as a friend and student of the soldiers; many of his hours were spent in relaxed conversation in the camp, and the well-being, comforts, rewards, and honors of his loyal troops seemed to genuinely concern him. However, after Gratian began to indulge more in his preference for hunting and shooting, he naturally aligned himself with the most skilled ministers of his favorite pastime. A group of Alani was incorporated into the military and domestic service of the palace, showcasing their impressive skills in the confined landscapes of Gaul, rather than the vast plains of Scythia. Gratian admired the abilities and customs of these favored guards, entrusting them exclusively with his personal defense; and, as if to provoke public opinion, he often appeared before the soldiers and the people dressed like a Scythian warrior, complete with long bow, a rattling quiver, and fur garments. The disgraceful sight of a Roman prince abandoning the attire and customs of his nation filled the legions with sorrow and anger. Even the Germans, who were strong and formidable in the empire's armies, pretended to scorn the bizarre and grotesque appearance of the Northern barbarians, who had migrated from the banks of the Volga to those of the Seine in just a few years. A loud and unruly murmur spread through the camps and garrisons of the West; and as Gratian's gentle laziness failed to quench the first signs of discontent, the absence of love and respect was not compensated for by the power of fear. But toppling a well-established government is always a task of real complexity and apparent difficulty; and Gratian's throne was shielded by the supports of tradition, law, religion, and the carefully maintained balance of civil and military powers established by Constantine's policies. It isn't essential to determine the cause of Britain's revolt. Chance often gives rise to disorder; the seeds of rebellion landed in a place historically fertile for tyrants and usurpers; the legions of that remote island had long been known for their arrogance and boldness; and the name of Maximus was proclaimed, by the uproarious but unified voices of both soldiers and locals. The figure of the emperor, or the rebel—this title had not yet been solidified by fortune—was a native of Spain, a compatriot, fellow soldier, and rival of Theodosius, whose rise he had watched with feelings of envy and resentment. Events in his life had long since locked him in Britain; and I would not be averse to finding evidence of the marriage he supposedly entered into with the daughter of a wealthy lord in Caernarvonshire. However, this provincial status could rightly be viewed as a form of exile and obscurity; and if Maximus held any civil or military role, it was neither of governor nor general. His skills, and even his integrity, were acknowledged by the biased historians of the time; and it must have been a significant merit that could elicit such praise in favor of the defeated enemy of Theodosius. Maximus's discontent might have pushed him to criticize his ruler's actions and possibly encourage, without any ambitions of his own, the troops' complaints. But amid the chaos, he cleverly, or humbly, declined to take the throne; and some credibility seems to have been given to his own affirmative statement that he was forced to accept the risky gift of the Imperial purple.
But there was danger likewise in refusing the empire; and from the moment that Maximus had violated his allegiance to his lawful sovereign, he could not hope to reign, or even to live, if he confined his moderate ambition within the narrow limits of Britain. He boldly and wisely resolved to prevent the designs of Gratian; the youth of the island crowded to his standard, and he invaded Gaul with a fleet and army, which were long afterwards remembered, as the emigration of a considerable part of the British nation. The emperor, in his peaceful residence of Paris, was alarmed by their hostile approach; and the darts which he idly wasted on lions and bears, might have been employed more honorably against the rebels. But his feeble efforts announced his degenerate spirit and desperate situation; and deprived him of the resources, which he still might have found, in the support of his subjects and allies. The armies of Gaul, instead of opposing the march of Maximus, received him with joyful and loyal acclamations; and the shame of the desertion was transferred from the people to the prince. The troops, whose station more immediately attached them to the service of the palace, abandoned the standard of Gratian the first time that it was displayed in the neighborhood of Paris. The emperor of the West fled towards Lyons, with a train of only three hundred horse; and, in the cities along the road, where he hoped to find refuge, or at least a passage, he was taught, by cruel experience, that every gate is shut against the unfortunate. Yet he might still have reached, in safety, the dominions of his brother; and soon have returned with the forces of Italy and the East; if he had not suffered himself to be fatally deceived by the perfidious governor of the Lyonnese province. Gratian was amused by protestations of doubtful fidelity, and the hopes of a support, which could not be effectual; till the arrival of Andragathius, the general of the cavalry of Maximus, put an end to his suspense. That resolute officer executed, without remorse, the orders or the intention of the usurper. Gratian, as he rose from supper, was delivered into the hands of the assassin: and his body was denied to the pious and pressing entreaties of his brother Valentinian. The death of the emperor was followed by that of his powerful general Mellobaudes, the king of the Franks; who maintained, to the last moment of his life, the ambiguous reputation, which is the just recompense of obscure and subtle policy. These executions might be necessary to the public safety: but the successful usurper, whose power was acknowledged by all the provinces of the West, had the merit, and the satisfaction, of boasting, that, except those who had perished by the chance of war, his triumph was not stained by the blood of the Romans.
But there was also danger in rejecting the empire; and from the moment Maximus broke his allegiance to his rightful ruler, he couldn't expect to reign, or even live, if he kept his moderate ambitions limited to Britain. He confidently and wisely decided to thwart Gratian's plans; the youth of the island rallied to his side, and he invaded Gaul with a fleet and army, which would later be remembered as a significant emigration of part of the British nation. The emperor, living in peace in Paris, was alarmed by their hostile approach; and the arrows he carelessly wasted on lions and bears could have been used more honorably against the rebels. But his weak efforts reflected his declining spirit and desperate situation, depriving him of the support he might still have found from his subjects and allies. The armies of Gaul, instead of resisting Maximus's advance, welcomed him with joyful and loyal cheers, and the shame of the desertion shifted from the people to the prince. The troops closest to the palace abandoned Gratian's banner the first time it was raised near Paris. The Western emperor fled toward Lyons with only three hundred horsemen; and in the cities along the way, where he hoped to find shelter or at least a way out, he learned through harsh experience that every door is closed to the unfortunate. Yet he might still have safely reached his brother's lands and soon returned with the forces from Italy and the East if he hadn't let himself be tragically misled by the treacherous governor of the Lyon region. Gratian was distracted by dubious assurances of loyalty and hopes for help that couldn't be effective, until the arrival of Andragathius, Maximus’s cavalry general, ended his uncertainty. That determined officer carried out the orders or intentions of the usurper without remorse. As Gratian rose from dinner, he fell into the hands of the assassin: and his body was denied to the urgent and heartfelt pleas of his brother Valentinian. The emperor’s death was followed by that of his powerful general Mellobaudes, the king of the Franks, who maintained, to the very end of his life, the ambiguous reputation that is the rightful reward of obscure and cunning politics. These executions may have been necessary for public safety: but the successful usurper, whose power was recognized by all the provinces of the West, could boast, with merit and satisfaction, that, aside from those who died by the chances of war, his triumph was not stained by Roman blood.
The events of this revolution had passed in such rapid succession, that it would have been impossible for Theodosius to march to the relief of his benefactor, before he received the intelligence of his defeat and death. During the season of sincere grief, or ostentatious mourning, the Eastern emperor was interrupted by the arrival of the principal chamberlain of Maximus; and the choice of a venerable old man, for an office which was usually exercised by eunuchs, announced to the court of Constantinople the gravity and temperance of the British usurper. The ambassador condescended to justify, or excuse, the conduct of his master; and to protest, in specious language, that the murder of Gratian had been perpetrated, without his knowledge or consent, by the precipitate zeal of the soldiers. But he proceeded, in a firm and equal tone, to offer Theodosius the alternative of peace, or war. The speech of the ambassador concluded with a spirited declaration, that although Maximus, as a Roman, and as the father of his people, would choose rather to employ his forces in the common defence of the republic, he was armed and prepared, if his friendship should be rejected, to dispute, in a field of battle, the empire of the world. An immediate and peremptory answer was required; but it was extremely difficult for Theodosius to satisfy, on this important occasion, either the feelings of his own mind, or the expectations of the public. The imperious voice of honor and gratitude called aloud for revenge. From the liberality of Gratian, he had received the Imperial diadem; his patience would encourage the odious suspicion, that he was more deeply sensible of former injuries, than of recent obligations; and if he accepted the friendship, he must seem to share the guilt, of the assassin. Even the principles of justice, and the interest of society, would receive a fatal blow from the impunity of Maximus; and the example of successful usurpation would tend to dissolve the artificial fabric of government, and once more to replunge the empire in the crimes and calamities of the preceding age. But, as the sentiments of gratitude and honor should invariably regulate the conduct of an individual, they may be overbalanced in the mind of a sovereign, by the sense of superior duties; and the maxims both of justice and humanity must permit the escape of an atrocious criminal, if an innocent people would be involved in the consequences of his punishment. The assassin of Gratian had usurped, but he actually possessed, the most warlike provinces of the empire: the East was exhausted by the misfortunes, and even by the success, of the Gothic war; and it was seriously to be apprehended, that, after the vital strength of the republic had been wasted in a doubtful and destructive contest, the feeble conqueror would remain an easy prey to the Barbarians of the North. These weighty considerations engaged Theodosius to dissemble his resentment, and to accept the alliance of the tyrant. But he stipulated, that Maximus should content himself with the possession of the countries beyond the Alps. The brother of Gratian was confirmed and secured in the sovereignty of Italy, Africa, and the Western Illyricum; and some honorable conditions were inserted in the treaty, to protect the memory, and the laws, of the deceased emperor. According to the custom of the age, the images of the three Imperial colleagues were exhibited to the veneration of the people; nor should it be lightly supposed, that, in the moment of a solemn reconciliation, Theodosius secretly cherished the intention of perfidy and revenge.
The events of this revolution happened so quickly that it would have been impossible for Theodosius to rush to the aid of his benefactor before hearing about his defeat and death. During a time of genuine sorrow or showy mourning, the Eastern emperor was interrupted by the arrival of Maximus's main chamberlain. The choice of a respected elderly man for a position typically held by eunuchs indicated the seriousness and restraint of the British usurper. The ambassador took it upon himself to justify, or excuse, his master’s actions, insisting, with convincing language, that Gratian's murder had occurred without his knowledge or approval, driven by the hasty zeal of the soldiers. However, he then firmly offered Theodosius the choice between peace and war. The ambassador concluded his speech with a passionate statement that although Maximus, as a Roman and a father to his people, would prefer to use his forces for the common defense of the republic, he was armed and ready, if his offer of friendship was rejected, to battle for control of the empire. A quick and decisive response was required; however, it was extremely challenging for Theodosius to meet both his own feelings and the public’s expectations in this crucial moment. The strong call of honor and gratitude demanded revenge. From Gratian’s generosity, Theodosius had received the Imperial crown; accepting Maximus's friendship might give rise to the unpleasant suspicion that he felt more strongly about past grievances than recent favors, and by doing so, he might seem to share the guilt of the assassin. Even the principles of justice and the welfare of society would suffer a serious blow if Maximus went unpunished; the example of successful usurpation could tear apart the structure of government and once again plunge the empire into the crimes and disasters of the previous era. However, while feelings of gratitude and honor should always guide an individual's actions, they may be outweighed in a sovereign's mind by a sense of greater duties; both justice and humanity may permit the escape of a heinous criminal if punishing him would harm innocent people. The assassin of Gratian had usurped power, but he did have control over the most warlike provinces of the empire. The East was weakened by the disasters, and even the successes, of the Gothic war, and it was a serious concern that after the republic’s strength had been drained in a precarious and destructive conflict, the weak conqueror would easily become a target for Northern Barbarians. These significant factors led Theodosius to hide his anger and accept the tyrant's alliance. However, he made it clear that Maximus must be satisfied with ruling over the lands beyond the Alps. Gratian’s brother was confirmed and assured in his rule over Italy, Africa, and Western Illyricum, and some respectable conditions were included in the treaty to honor the memory and laws of the deceased emperor. As was customary at the time, the images of the three Imperial colleagues were displayed for the people's respect; it should not be assumed lightly that during this solemn reconciliation, Theodosius secretly harbored intentions of treachery and vengeance.
The contempt of Gratian for the Roman soldiers had exposed him to the fatal effects of their resentment. His profound veneration for the Christian clergy was rewarded by the applause and gratitude of a powerful order, which has claimed, in every age, the privilege of dispensing honors, both on earth and in heaven. The orthodox bishops bewailed his death, and their own irreparable loss; but they were soon comforted by the discovery, that Gratian had committed the sceptre of the East to the hands of a prince, whose humble faith and fervent zeal, were supported by the spirit and abilities of a more vigorous character. Among the benefactors of the church, the fame of Constantine has been rivalled by the glory of Theodosius. If Constantine had the advantage of erecting the standard of the cross, the emulation of his successor assumed the merit of subduing the Arian heresy, and of abolishing the worship of idols in the Roman world. Theodosius was the first of the emperors baptized in the true faith of the Trinity. Although he was born of a Christian family, the maxims, or at least the practice, of the age, encouraged him to delay the ceremony of his initiation; till he was admonished of the danger of delay, by the serious illness which threatened his life, towards the end of the first year of his reign. Before he again took the field against the Goths, he received the sacrament of baptism from Acholius, the orthodox bishop of Thessalonica: and, as the emperor ascended from the holy font, still glowing with the warm feelings of regeneration, he dictated a solemn edict, which proclaimed his own faith, and prescribed the religion of his subjects. "It is our pleasure (such is the Imperial style) that all the nations, which are governed by our clemency and moderation, should steadfastly adhere to the religion which was taught by St. Peter to the Romans; which faithful tradition has preserved; and which is now professed by the pontiff Damasus, and by Peter, bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. According to the discipline of the apostles, and the doctrine of the gospel, let us believe the sole deity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; under an equal majesty, and a pious Trinity. We authorize the followers of this doctrine to assume the title of Catholic Christians; and as we judge, that all others are extravagant madmen, we brand them with the infamous name of Heretics; and declare that their conventicles shall no longer usurp the respectable appellation of churches. Besides the condemnation of divine justice, they must expect to suffer the severe penalties, which our authority, guided by heavenly wisdom, shall think proper to inflict upon them." The faith of a soldier is commonly the fruit of instruction, rather than of inquiry; but as the emperor always fixed his eyes on the visible landmarks of orthodoxy, which he had so prudently constituted, his religious opinions were never affected by the specious texts, the subtle arguments, and the ambiguous creeds of the Arian doctors. Once indeed he expressed a faint inclination to converse with the eloquent and learned Eunomius, who lived in retirement at a small distance from Constantinople. But the dangerous interview was prevented by the prayers of the empress Flaccilla, who trembled for the salvation of her husband; and the mind of Theodosius was confirmed by a theological argument, adapted to the rudest capacity. He had lately bestowed on his eldest son, Arcadius, the name and honors of Augustus, and the two princes were seated on a stately throne to receive the homage of their subjects. A bishop, Amphilochius of Iconium, approached the throne, and after saluting, with due reverence, the person of his sovereign, he accosted the royal youth with the same familiar tenderness which he might have used towards a plebeian child. Provoked by this insolent behavior, the monarch gave orders, that the rustic priest should be instantly driven from his presence. But while the guards were forcing him to the door, the dexterous polemic had time to execute his design, by exclaiming, with a loud voice, "Such is the treatment, O emperor! which the King of heaven has prepared for those impious men, who affect to worship the Father, but refuse to acknowledge the equal majesty of his divine Son." Theodosius immediately embraced the bishop of Iconium, and never forgot the important lesson, which he had received from this dramatic parable.
The disdain Gratian showed for the Roman soldiers put him at serious risk of their anger. His deep respect for the Christian clergy earned him the applause and gratitude of a powerful order that has claimed, throughout history, the right to grant honors both on earth and in heaven. The orthodox bishops mourned his death and what they saw as their own irreplaceable loss; however, they soon found solace in knowing that Gratian had handed the scepter of the East to a prince whose humble faith and passionate zeal were backed by the spirit and skills of a more robust character. Among the benefactors of the church, Theodosius has rivaled the fame of Constantine. While Constantine had the advantage of raising the standard of the cross, his successor took pride in overcoming the Arian heresy and ending the worship of idols in the Roman world. Theodosius was the first emperor baptized into the true faith of the Trinity. Even though he was born into a Christian family, the beliefs and practices of the day led him to postpone the initiation ceremony until he was warned about the risks of delay by a serious illness that threatened his life at the end of his first year in power. Before he returned to battle against the Goths, he was baptized by Acholius, the orthodox bishop of Thessalonica; and as the emperor emerged from the holy font, still filled with the warmth of new life, he issued a solemn edict that proclaimed his faith and dictated the religion of his subjects. "It is our wish (such is the Imperial style) that all nations under our kindness and fairness should firmly stick to the religion that St. Peter taught the Romans; which faithful tradition has kept alive; and which is now endorsed by Pope Damasus and by Peter, bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. Following the teachings of the apostles and the doctrine of the gospel, we should believe in the one God of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; sharing equal majesty in a devout Trinity. We allow followers of this doctrine to call themselves Catholic Christians; and since we believe that everyone else is misguided, we label them with the disgraceful title of Heretics; and declare that their gatherings will no longer be called churches. Besides the condemnation of divine justice, they should expect to face the harsh penalties that our authority, guided by divine wisdom, deems appropriate to impose on them." A soldier's faith usually stems from being taught rather than from questioning; yet the emperor always focused on the visible markers of orthodoxy, which he had wisely established, so his religious views were never swayed by the appealing texts, clever arguments, and vague creeds of the Arian teachers. Once, he showed a slight interest in talking with the eloquent and learned Eunomius, who lived not far from Constantinople. But this risky meeting was averted by the prayers of Empress Flaccilla, who feared for her husband's soul; and Theodosius's mind was solidified by a theological argument suited for the simplest understanding. He had recently given his eldest son, Arcadius, the title and honors of Augustus, and the two princes sat on a grand throne to receive honors from their subjects. A bishop, Amphilochius of Iconium, approached the throne, and after respectfully greeting his sovereign, he spoke to the young royal with the same familiar warmth he might use with a common child. Angered by this disrespectful behavior, the monarch ordered that the rustic priest be immediately removed from his presence. But as the guards were forcing him toward the exit, the crafty polemic had enough time to make his point by exclaiming loudly, “This is the treatment, O emperor! that the King of heaven has prepared for those wicked men who pretend to worship the Father but refuse to acknowledge the equal greatness of his divine Son.” Theodosius immediately embraced the bishop of Iconium and never forgot the important lesson he learned from this dramatic encounter.
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part II.
Constantinople was the principal seat and fortress of Arianism; and, in a long interval of forty years, the faith of the princes and prelates, who reigned in the capital of the East, was rejected in the purer schools of Rome and Alexandria. The archiepiscopal throne of Macedonius, which had been polluted with so much Christian blood, was successively filled by Eudoxus and Damophilus. Their diocese enjoyed a free importation of vice and error from every province of the empire; the eager pursuit of religious controversy afforded a new occupation to the busy idleness of the metropolis; and we may credit the assertion of an intelligent observer, who describes, with some pleasantry, the effects of their loquacious zeal. "This city," says he, "is full of mechanics and slaves, who are all of them profound theologians; and preach in the shops, and in the streets. If you desire a man to change a piece of silver, he informs you, wherein the Son differs from the Father; if you ask the price of a loaf, you are told by way of reply, that the Son is inferior to the Father; and if you inquire, whether the bath is ready, the answer is, that the Son was made out of nothing." The heretics, of various denominations, subsisted in peace under the protection of the Arians of Constantinople; who endeavored to secure the attachment of those obscure sectaries, while they abused, with unrelenting severity, the victory which they had obtained over the followers of the council of Nice. During the partial reigns of Constantius and Valens, the feeble remnant of the Homoousians was deprived of the public and private exercise of their religion; and it has been observed, in pathetic language, that the scattered flock was left without a shepherd to wander on the mountains, or to be devoured by rapacious wolves. But, as their zeal, instead of being subdued, derived strength and vigor from oppression, they seized the first moments of imperfect freedom, which they had acquired by the death of Valens, to form themselves into a regular congregation, under the conduct of an episcopal pastor. Two natives of Cappadocia, Basil, and Gregory Nazianzen, were distinguished above all their contemporaries, by the rare union of profane eloquence and of orthodox piety. These orators, who might sometimes be compared, by themselves, and by the public, to the most celebrated of the ancient Greeks, were united by the ties of the strictest friendship. They had cultivated, with equal ardor, the same liberal studies in the schools of Athens; they had retired, with equal devotion, to the same solitude in the deserts of Pontus; and every spark of emulation, or envy, appeared to be totally extinguished in the holy and ingenuous breasts of Gregory and Basil. But the exaltation of Basil, from a private life to the archiepiscopal throne of Cæsarea, discovered to the world, and perhaps to himself, the pride of his character; and the first favor which he condescended to bestow on his friend, was received, and perhaps was intended, as a cruel insult. Instead of employing the superior talents of Gregory in some useful and conspicuous station, the haughty prelate selected, among the fifty bishoprics of his extensive province, the wretched village of Sasima, without water, without verdure, without society, situate at the junction of three highways, and frequented only by the incessant passage of rude and clamorous wagoners. Gregory submitted with reluctance to this humiliating exile; he was ordained bishop of Sasima; but he solemnly protests, that he never consummated his spiritual marriage with this disgusting bride. He afterwards consented to undertake the government of his native church of Nazianzus, of which his father had been bishop above five-and-forty years. But as he was still conscious that he deserved another audience, and another theatre, he accepted, with no unworthy ambition, the honorable invitation, which was addressed to him from the orthodox party of Constantinople. On his arrival in the capital, Gregory was entertained in the house of a pious and charitable kinsman; the most spacious room was consecrated to the uses of religious worship; and the name of Anastasia was chosen to express the resurrection of the Nicene faith. This private conventicle was afterwards converted into a magnificent church; and the credulity of the succeeding age was prepared to believe the miracles and visions, which attested the presence, or at least the protection, of the Mother of God. The pulpit of the Anastasia was the scene of the labors and triumphs of Gregory Nazianzen; and, in the space of two years, he experienced all the spiritual adventures which constitute the prosperous or adverse fortunes of a missionary. The Arians, who were provoked by the boldness of his enterprise, represented his doctrine, as if he had preached three distinct and equal Deities; and the devout populace was excited to suppress, by violence and tumult, the irregular assemblies of the Athanasian heretics. From the cathedral of St. Sophia there issued a motley crowd "of common beggars, who had forfeited their claim to pity; of monks, who had the appearance of goats or satyrs; and of women, more terrible than so many Jezebels." The doors of the Anastasia were broke open; much mischief was perpetrated, or attempted, with sticks, stones, and firebrands; and as a man lost his life in the affray, Gregory, who was summoned the next morning before the magistrate, had the satisfaction of supposing, that he publicly confessed the name of Christ. After he was delivered from the fear and danger of a foreign enemy, his infant church was disgraced and distracted by intestine faction. A stranger who assumed the name of Maximus, and the cloak of a Cynic philosopher, insinuated himself into the confidence of Gregory; deceived and abused his favorable opinion; and forming a secret connection with some bishops of Egypt, attempted, by a clandestine ordination, to supplant his patron in the episcopal seat of Constantinople. These mortifications might sometimes tempt the Cappadocian missionary to regret his obscure solitude. But his fatigues were rewarded by the daily increase of his fame and his congregation; and he enjoyed the pleasure of observing, that the greater part of his numerous audience retired from his sermons satisfied with the eloquence of the preacher, or dissatisfied with the manifold imperfections of their faith and practice.
Constantinople was the main center and stronghold of Arianism; and for a long stretch of forty years, the beliefs of the princes and church leaders ruling in the eastern capital were rejected by the purer schools of Rome and Alexandria. The archbishopric of Macedonius, which had been tainted by so much Christian blood, was successively filled by Eudoxus and Damophilus. Their diocese saw a free influx of vice and false ideas from every part of the empire; the intense interest in religious debates provided a new way to fill the idle time of the city; and we can believe the claim of a keen observer, who humorously described the effects of their talkative zeal. "This city," he said, "is full of mechanics and slaves, all of whom are profound theologians; and they preach in the shops and in the streets. If you ask a man to change a piece of silver, he’ll tell you how the Son differs from the Father; if you ask the price of a loaf of bread, the response will be that the Son is inferior to the Father; and if you want to know if the bath is ready, the answer will be that the Son was made from nothing." Various heretics lived in peace under the protection of the Arians in Constantinople, who tried to secure the loyalty of those obscure sects while they ruthlessly abused the victory they had gained over the followers of the Council of Nicaea. During the partial reigns of Constantius and Valens, the weak remnants of the Homoousians were stripped of the right to practice their religion publicly or privately; it has been expressed, in moving terms, that the scattered flock was left without a shepherd to wander the mountains or be preyed upon by ravenous wolves. However, as their zeal wasn’t crushed but instead grew stronger from oppression, they seized the first moments of limited freedom that came with Valens’ death to form themselves into a proper congregation under the guidance of an episcopal leader. Two natives of Cappadocia, Basil and Gregory Nazianzen, stood out above all their contemporaries due to their rare combination of eloquence and orthodox piety. These orators, who were sometimes compared by themselves and others to the most celebrated ancient Greeks, were bound by the strongest friendship. They had equally pursued the same liberal studies in the schools of Athens; they had devotedly retreated to the same solitude in the deserts of Pontus; and all feelings of rivalry or jealousy appeared to be entirely extinguished in the pure and sincere hearts of Gregory and Basil. But Basil's ascent from a private life to the archbishopric of Cæsarea revealed, to the world and perhaps to himself, the pride of his character; and the first favor he chose to bestow on his friend was received, and perhaps intended, as a cruel insult. Instead of placing Gregory's exceptional talents in a useful and prominent position, the proud archbishop chose the miserable village of Sasima, which had no water, no greenery, and no community, located at the crossroads of three highways, visited only by the constant passage of rude and loud wagon drivers. Gregory reluctantly submitted to this humiliating exile; he was ordained as the bishop of Sasima, but he solemnly declared that he never fully embraced this unpleasant role. He later agreed to take over the leadership of his hometown church of Nazianzus, of which his father had been bishop for over forty-five years. However, as he still felt he deserved a wider audience and a bigger stage, he accepted, with a rightful ambition, the honorable invitation sent to him by the orthodox group in Constantinople. Upon his arrival in the capital, Gregory was hosted by a pious and charitable relative; the largest room was dedicated for religious worship; and the name of Anastasia was chosen to signify the resurrection of the Nicene faith. This private gathering eventually transformed into a magnificent church; and the credulity of the following age was ready to believe in the miracles and visions that attested to the presence, or at least the protection, of the Mother of God. The pulpit of Anastasia became the stage for the labors and triumphs of Gregory Nazianzen; and within two years, he encountered all the spiritual challenges that define the successes and struggles of a missionary. The Arians, angered by his daring, portrayed his teachings as if he were preaching three distinct and equal deities; and the devout populace was stirred into suppressing, by violence and chaos, the irregular gatherings of the Athanasian heretics. From the cathedral of St. Sophia emerged a motley crowd of "common beggars, who had lost their claim to pity; of monks, resembling goats or satyrs; and of women, more terrifying than so many Jezebels." The doors of Anastasia were broken open; much chaos was caused, or attempted, with sticks, stones, and fire; and when a man lost his life in the disturbance, Gregory, who was summoned the next morning before the magistrate, found satisfaction in supposedly publicly confessing the name of Christ. After he was freed from the fear and danger from a foreign enemy, his fledgling church was marred and disrupted by internal conflict. A stranger who took the name of Maximus and the guise of a Cynic philosopher wormed his way into Gregory's confidence; he deceived and misused his goodwill; and forming a secret alliance with some bishops from Egypt, he attempted, through clandestine ordination, to replace Gregory in the episcopal position of Constantinople. These humiliations sometimes tempted the Cappadocian missionary to yearn for his quiet solitude. But his efforts were rewarded by the daily growth of his fame and his congregation; and he took pleasure in seeing that the majority of his numerous audience left his sermons either satisfied with the eloquence of the preacher or dissatisfied with the multiple shortcomings of their faith and practice.
The Catholics of Constantinople were animated with joyful confidence by the baptism and edict of Theodosius; and they impatiently waited the effects of his gracious promise. Their hopes were speedily accomplished; and the emperor, as soon as he had finished the operations of the campaign, made his public entry into the capital at the head of a victorious army. The next day after his arrival, he summoned Damophilus to his presence, and offered that Arian prelate the hard alternative of subscribing the Nicene creed, or of instantly resigning, to the orthodox believers, the use and possession of the episcopal palace, the cathedral of St. Sophia, and all the churches of Constantinople. The zeal of Damophilus, which in a Catholic saint would have been justly applauded, embraced, without hesitation, a life of poverty and exile, and his removal was immediately followed by the purification of the Imperial city. The Arians might complain, with some appearance of justice, that an inconsiderable congregation of sectaries should usurp the hundred churches, which they were insufficient to fill; whilst the far greater part of the people was cruelly excluded from every place of religious worship. Theodosius was still inexorable; but as the angels who protected the Catholic cause were only visible to the eyes of faith, he prudently reënforced those heavenly legions with the more effectual aid of temporal and carnal weapons; and the church of St. Sophia was occupied by a large body of the Imperial guards. If the mind of Gregory was susceptible of pride, he must have felt a very lively satisfaction, when the emperor conducted him through the streets in solemn triumph; and, with his own hand, respectfully placed him on the archiepiscopal throne of Constantinople. But the saint (who had not subdued the imperfections of human virtue) was deeply affected by the mortifying consideration, that his entrance into the fold was that of a wolf, rather than of a shepherd; that the glittering arms which surrounded his person, were necessary for his safety; and that he alone was the object of the imprecations of a great party, whom, as men and citizens, it was impossible for him to despise. He beheld the innumerable multitude of either sex, and of every age, who crowded the streets, the windows, and the roofs of the houses; he heard the tumultuous voice of rage, grief, astonishment, and despair; and Gregory fairly confesses, that on the memorable day of his installation, the capital of the East wore the appearance of a city taken by storm, and in the hands of a Barbarian conqueror. About six weeks afterwards, Theodosius declared his resolution of expelling from all the churches of his dominions the bishops and their clergy who should obstinately refuse to believe, or at least to profess, the doctrine of the council of Nice. His lieutenant, Sapor, was armed with the ample powers of a general law, a special commission, and a military force; and this ecclesiastical revolution was conducted with so much discretion and vigor, that the religion of the emperor was established, without tumult or bloodshed, in all the provinces of the East. The writings of the Arians, if they had been permitted to exist, would perhaps contain the lamentable story of the persecution, which afflicted the church under the reign of the impious Theodosius; and the sufferings of their holy confessors might claim the pity of the disinterested reader. Yet there is reason to imagine, that the violence of zeal and revenge was, in some measure, eluded by the want of resistance; and that, in their adversity, the Arians displayed much less firmness than had been exerted by the orthodox party under the reigns of Constantius and Valens. The moral character and conduct of the hostile sects appear to have been governed by the same common principles of nature and religion: but a very material circumstance may be discovered, which tended to distinguish the degrees of their theological faith. Both parties, in the schools, as well as in the temples, acknowledged and worshipped the divine majesty of Christ; and, as we are always prone to impute our own sentiments and passions to the Deity, it would be deemed more prudent and respectful to exaggerate, than to circumscribe, the adorable perfections of the Son of God. The disciple of Athanasius exulted in the proud confidence, that he had entitled himself to the divine favor; while the follower of Arius must have been tormented by the secret apprehension, that he was guilty, perhaps, of an unpardonable offence, by the scanty praise, and parsimonious honors, which he bestowed on the Judge of the World. The opinions of Arianism might satisfy a cold and speculative mind: but the doctrine of the Nicene creed, most powerfully recommended by the merits of faith and devotion, was much better adapted to become popular and successful in a believing age.
The Catholics of Constantinople were filled with joyful confidence by the baptism and decree of Theodosius; they eagerly awaited the results of his generous promise. Their hopes were quickly fulfilled; and as soon as the emperor completed his campaign, he made a grand entrance into the capital leading a victorious army. The day after his arrival, he summoned Damophilus to meet him and presented the Arian bishop with the harsh choice of either accepting the Nicene creed or immediately resigning the episcopal palace, the cathedral of St. Sophia, and all the churches in Constantinople to the orthodox believers. Damophilus, whose fervor would have been commendable in a Catholic saint, unhesitatingly accepted a life of poverty and exile, and his departure was swiftly followed by the cleansing of the Imperial city. The Arians could reasonably complain that a small group of dissenters was occupying the hundred churches they could not adequately fill, while the vast majority of people were cruelly excluded from any place of worship. Theodosius remained firm; but since the angels supporting the Catholic cause were only visible to those with faith, he wisely reinforced those heavenly forces with the more effective means of physical and military power; consequently, a large contingent of Imperial guards occupied the church of St. Sophia. If Gregory's mind was ever prone to pride, he must have felt considerable satisfaction when the emperor paraded him through the streets in solemn triumph and personally placed him on the archiepiscopal throne of Constantinople. Yet, the saint (who had not overcome the imperfections of human virtue) was deeply troubled by the embarrassing realization that his entrance into the church resembled that of a wolf rather than a shepherd; that the shining weapons surrounding him were necessary for his protection; and that he alone was the target of the curses from a significant faction, whom, as individuals and citizens, he could not afford to despise. He saw the countless crowd of men and women of all ages packed in the streets, the windows, and the rooftops; he heard the chaotic sounds of anger, sadness, disbelief, and despair; and Gregory fully admitted that on the memorable day of his installation, the capital of the East looked like a city ravaged by storm and in the hands of a barbarian conqueror. About six weeks later, Theodosius declared his intention to expel from all the churches in his empire any bishops and their clergy who would stubbornly refuse to believe or at least profess the doctrine of the council of Nice. His deputy, Sapor, was granted broad authority through general law, a special mandate, and military support; and this ecclesiastical upheaval was carried out with such prudence and decisiveness that the emperor's religion was established without disturbance or bloodshed across all the provinces of the East. The writings of the Arians, if they had been allowed to survive, might have contained the tragic account of the persecution that afflicted their church under the reign of the impious Theodosius; and the sufferings of their holy confessors might have drawn the sympathy of fair-minded readers. Yet, it seems that the fervor of zeal and vengeance was, to some extent, sidestepped by the absence of resistance; and that, in their misfortune, the Arians showed much less resolve than the orthodox party had demonstrated during the reigns of Constantius and Valens. The moral character and actions of the opposing sects appeared to be guided by the same basic principles of nature and religion: however, a significant factor may be identified that helped differentiate the levels of their theological belief. Both groups, in the schools as well as in the churches, recognized and worshiped the divine majesty of Christ; and, because we tend to assign our own feelings and passions to the Deity, it was commonly viewed as wiser and more respectful to amplify rather than limit the glorious qualities of the Son of God. The followers of Athanasius took pride in their confident belief that they had earned God's favor; while the supporters of Arius must have struggled with the hidden fear that they were possibly committing an unforgivable sin by giving minimal praise and meager honor to the Judge of the World. Arian beliefs may have satisfied a detached and theoretical mind: but the doctrine of the Nicene creed, strongly endorsed by the merits of faith and devotion, was far better suited to gain popularity and thrive in a time of belief.
The hope, that truth and wisdom would be found in the assemblies of the orthodox clergy, induced the emperor to convene, at Constantinople, a synod of one hundred and fifty bishops, who proceeded, without much difficulty or delay, to complete the theological system which had been established in the council of Nice. The vehement disputes of the fourth century had been chiefly employed on the nature of the Son of God; and the various opinions which were embraced, concerning the Second, were extended and transferred, by a natural analogy, to the Third person of the Trinity. Yet it was found, or it was thought, necessary, by the victorious adversaries of Arianism, to explain the ambiguous language of some respectable doctors; to confirm the faith of the Catholics; and to condemn an unpopular and inconsistent sect of Macedonians; who freely admitted that the Son was consubstantial to the Father, while they were fearful of seeming to acknowledge the existence of Three Gods. A final and unanimous sentence was pronounced to ratify the equal Deity of the Holy Ghost: the mysterious doctrine has been received by all the nations, and all the churches of the Christian world; and their grateful reverence has assigned to the bishops of Theodosius the second rank among the general councils. Their knowledge of religious truth may have been preserved by tradition, or it may have been communicated by inspiration; but the sober evidence of history will not allow much weight to the personal authority of the Fathers of Constantinople. In an age when the ecclesiastics had scandalously degenerated from the model of apostolic purity, the most worthless and corrupt were always the most eager to frequent, and disturb, the episcopal assemblies. The conflict and fermentation of so many opposite interests and tempers inflamed the passions of the bishops: and their ruling passions were, the love of gold, and the love of dispute. Many of the same prelates who now applauded the orthodox piety of Theodosius, had repeatedly changed, with prudent flexibility, their creeds and opinions; and in the various revolutions of the church and state, the religion of their sovereign was the rule of their obsequious faith. When the emperor suspended his prevailing influence, the turbulent synod was blindly impelled by the absurd or selfish motives of pride, hatred, or resentment. The death of Meletius, which happened at the council of Constantinople, presented the most favorable opportunity of terminating the schism of Antioch, by suffering his aged rival, Paulinus, peaceably to end his days in the episcopal chair. The faith and virtues of Paulinus were unblemished. But his cause was supported by the Western churches; and the bishops of the synod resolved to perpetuate the mischiefs of discord, by the hasty ordination of a perjured candidate, rather than to betray the imagined dignity of the East, which had been illustrated by the birth and death of the Son of God. Such unjust and disorderly proceedings forced the gravest members of the assembly to dissent and to secede; and the clamorous majority which remained masters of the field of battle, could be compared only to wasps or magpies, to a flight of cranes, or to a flock of geese.
The hope that truth and wisdom would be found in the gatherings of the orthodox clergy led the emperor to call a synod of one hundred and fifty bishops in Constantinople. They quickly worked to finalize the theological framework established at the council of Nice. The intense debates of the fourth century mostly focused on the nature of the Son of God, and various opinions about the Second were naturally applied to the Third person of the Trinity. However, the victorious opponents of Arianism felt it was necessary to clarify the confusing language of some respected theologians, reinforce the faith of Catholics, and condemn an unpopular and inconsistent group known as the Macedonians, who willingly accepted that the Son was consubstantial with the Father but were hesitant to imply the existence of Three Gods. A final and unanimous decision was made to affirm the equal divinity of the Holy Spirit; this mysterious doctrine has been accepted by all nations and churches of the Christian world, and their grateful respect has earned the bishops of Theodosius the second rank among general councils. Their understanding of religious truth might have been passed down through tradition or revealed through inspiration, but sober historical evidence doesn’t lend much credibility to the personal authority of the Fathers of Constantinople. In a time when church officials had scandalously strayed from the model of apostolic purity, the most worthless and corrupt individuals were often the most eager to attend and disrupt episcopal meetings. The clash of many conflicting interests and personalities stirred up the bishops' passions, with their dominant motivations being the love of wealth and the love of argument. Many of the same bishops who praised Theodosius’s orthodox faith had frequently shifted their creeds and beliefs as needed, and in the varying upheavals of church and state, their sovereign's religion dictated their obedient faith. When the emperor withdrew his dominant influence, the tumultuous synod was blindly driven by foolish or selfish feelings of pride, hatred, or resentment. The death of Meletius during the council in Constantinople created an opportunity to resolve the schism in Antioch by allowing his older rival, Paulinus, to peacefully finish his days as bishop. Paulinus’s faith and virtues were impeccable. However, his cause had the backing of the Western churches, and the bishops at the synod chose to perpetuate the troubles of discord by hastily ordaining a dishonest candidate rather than risking the imagined dignity of the East, which had been honored by the birth and death of the Son of God. Such unjust and chaotic actions caused the more serious members of the assembly to object and withdraw, while the noisy majority that remained could only be compared to wasps or magpies, a flock of cranes, or a gaggle of geese.
A suspicion may possibly arise, that so unfavorable a picture of ecclesiastical synods has been drawn by the partial hand of some obstinate heretic, or some malicious infidel. But the name of the sincere historian who has conveyed this instructive lesson to the knowledge of posterity, must silence the impotent murmurs of superstition and bigotry. He was one of the most pious and eloquent bishops of the age; a saint, and a doctor of the church; the scourge of Arianism, and the pillar of the orthodox faith; a distinguished member of the council of Constantinople, in which, after the death of Meletius, he exercised the functions of president; in a word—Gregory Nazianzen himself. The harsh and ungenerous treatment which he experienced, instead of derogating from the truth of his evidence, affords an additional proof of the spirit which actuated the deliberations of the synod. Their unanimous suffrage had confirmed the pretensions which the bishop of Constantinople derived from the choice of the people, and the approbation of the emperor. But Gregory soon became the victim of malice and envy. The bishops of the East, his strenuous adherents, provoked by his moderation in the affairs of Antioch, abandoned him, without support, to the adverse faction of the Egyptians; who disputed the validity of his election, and rigorously asserted the obsolete canon, that prohibited the licentious practice of episcopal translations. The pride, or the humility, of Gregory prompted him to decline a contest which might have been imputed to ambition and avarice; and he publicly offered, not without some mixture of indignation, to renounce the government of a church which had been restored, and almost created, by his labors. His resignation was accepted by the synod, and by the emperor, with more readiness than he seems to have expected. At the time when he might have hoped to enjoy the fruits of his victory, his episcopal throne was filled by the senator Nectarius; and the new archbishop, accidentally recommended by his easy temper and venerable aspect, was obliged to delay the ceremony of his consecration, till he had previously despatched the rites of his baptism. After this remarkable experience of the ingratitude of princes and prelates, Gregory retired once more to his obscure solitude of Cappadocia; where he employed the remainder of his life, about eight years, in the exercises of poetry and devotion. The title of Saint has been added to his name: but the tenderness of his heart, and the elegance of his genius, reflect a more pleasing lustre on the memory of Gregory Nazianzen.
A suspicion might arise that such a negative portrayal of church synods has been crafted by a biased heretic or a malicious nonbeliever. But the reputation of the earnest historian who shared this valuable lesson with future generations should silence any weak murmurs of superstition and prejudice. He was one of the most devout and articulate bishops of his time; a saint and a doctor of the church; the critic of Arianism and the support of orthodox faith; a notable member of the Council of Constantinople, where, after Meletius's death, he served as president—none other than Gregory Nazianzen himself. The harsh treatment he faced, instead of diminishing the truth of his testimony, provides further evidence of the spirit guiding the council's discussions. Their unanimous vote upheld the claims of the Bishop of Constantinople, endorsed by the people's choice and the emperor's approval. However, Gregory quickly fell victim to malice and jealousy. The Eastern bishops, his staunch supporters, abandoned him to the opposing Egyptian faction, upset by his moderation in Antioch, who questioned the legitimacy of his election and strictly enforced an outdated rule against the questionable practice of episcopal transfers. Gregory's pride or humility led him to avoid a contest that could be seen as driven by ambition and greed; he publicly offered, not without a sense of indignation, to step down from the leadership of a church he helped restore. The synod and the emperor accepted his resignation more readily than he likely anticipated. Just when he might have expected to enjoy the rewards of his victory, his episcopal seat was taken by the senator Nectarius; this new archbishop, who was accidentally favored for his easygoing nature and respectable appearance, had to postpone his consecration until after completing his baptism. Following this notable experience of the ingratitude of rulers and church leaders, Gregory returned to his quiet solitude in Cappadocia, where he spent the last eight years of his life engaged in poetry and devotion. He has since been given the title of Saint, but the kindness of his heart and the grace of his poetry shine a more appealing light on the memory of Gregory Nazianzen.
It was not enough that Theodosius had suppressed the insolent reign of Arianism, or that he had abundantly revenged the injuries which the Catholics sustained from the zeal of Constantius and Valens. The orthodox emperor considered every heretic as a rebel against the supreme powers of heaven and of earth; and each of those powers might exercise their peculiar jurisdiction over the soul and body of the guilty. The decrees of the council of Constantinople had ascertained the true standard of the faith; and the ecclesiastics, who governed the conscience of Theodosius, suggested the most effectual methods of persecution. In the space of fifteen years, he promulgated at least fifteen severe edicts against the heretics; more especially against those who rejected the doctrine of the Trinity; and to deprive them of every hope of escape, he sternly enacted, that if any laws or rescripts should be alleged in their favor, the judges should consider them as the illegal productions either of fraud or forgery. The penal statutes were directed against the ministers, the assemblies, and the persons of the heretics; and the passions of the legislator were expressed in the language of declamation and invective. I. The heretical teachers, who usurped the sacred titles of Bishops, or Presbyters, were not only excluded from the privileges and emoluments so liberally granted to the orthodox clergy, but they were exposed to the heavy penalties of exile and confiscation, if they presumed to preach the doctrine, or to practise the rites, of their accursed sects. A fine of ten pounds of gold (above four hundred pounds sterling) was imposed on every person who should dare to confer, or receive, or promote, an heretical ordination: and it was reasonably expected, that if the race of pastors could be extinguished, their helpless flocks would be compelled, by ignorance and hunger, to return within the pale of the Catholic church. II. The rigorous prohibition of conventicles was carefully extended to every possible circumstance, in which the heretics could assemble with the intention of worshipping God and Christ according to the dictates of their conscience. Their religious meetings, whether public or secret, by day or by night, in cities or in the country, were equally proscribed by the edicts of Theodosius; and the building, or ground, which had been used for that illegal purpose, was forfeited to the Imperial domain. III. It was supposed, that the error of the heretics could proceed only from the obstinate temper of their minds; and that such a temper was a fit object of censure and punishment. The anathemas of the church were fortified by a sort of civil excommunication; which separated them from their fellow-citizens, by a peculiar brand of infamy; and this declaration of the supreme magistrate tended to justify, or at least to excuse, the insults of a fanatic populace. The sectaries were gradually disqualified from the possession of honorable or lucrative employments; and Theodosius was satisfied with his own justice, when he decreed, that, as the Eunomians distinguished the nature of the Son from that of the Father, they should be incapable of making their wills or of receiving any advantage from testamentary donations. The guilt of the Manichæan heresy was esteemed of such magnitude, that it could be expiated only by the death of the offender; and the same capital punishment was inflicted on the Audians, or Quartodecimans, who should dare to perpetrate the atrocious crime of celebrating on an improper day the festival of Easter. Every Roman might exercise the right of public accusation; but the office of Inquisitors of the Faith, a name so deservedly abhorred, was first instituted under the reign of Theodosius. Yet we are assured, that the execution of his penal edicts was seldom enforced; and that the pious emperor appeared less desirous to punish, than to reclaim, or terrify, his refractory subjects.
It wasn't enough that Theodosius had put an end to the arrogant rule of Arianism or that he had thoroughly avenged the harms that Catholics suffered from the fervor of Constantius and Valens. The orthodox emperor viewed every heretic as a rebel against the highest powers of heaven and earth; and each of those powers could exercise their own authority over the souls and bodies of the guilty. The decrees of the council of Constantinople had established the true standard of faith; and the church leaders who guided Theodosius's conscience suggested the most effective ways to persecute. Over fifteen years, he enacted at least fifteen harsh edicts against heretics, especially those who denied the doctrine of the Trinity; and to strip them of any chance of escape, he sternly declared that if any laws or documents were presented in their favor, judges should regard them as fraudulent or forged. The punitive laws targeted the ministers, gatherings, and individuals of the heretics; and the emotions of the lawmaker were expressed through dramatic and accusatory language. The heretical teachers who took on the sacred titles of Bishops or Presbyters were not only barred from the privileges and benefits generously given to the orthodox clergy, but they also faced serious penalties of exile and confiscation if they dared to preach the teachings or perform the rituals of their cursed sects. A fine of ten pounds of gold (over four hundred pounds sterling) was imposed on anyone who would dare to confer, receive, or promote a heretical ordination; and it was reasonably believed that if the group of pastors could be eliminated, their helpless followers would be forced, by ignorance and hunger, to return to the Catholic church. The strict ban on gatherings was thoroughly expanded to cover every possible situation in which heretics might come together to worship God and Christ according to their own beliefs. Their religious meetings, whether public or private, during the day or night, in cities or in the countryside, were all equally banned by Theodosius's edicts; and any building or land used for that illegal purpose was confiscated by the Imperial authority. It was believed that the heretics' error stemmed solely from their stubborn mindset; and such a mindset was seen as a proper target for censure and punishment. The church's anathemas were backed by a form of civil excommunication that separated them from their fellow citizens, marking them with a unique disgrace; this declaration from the highest authority helped justify, or at least excuse, the attacks from an enraged public. The sectarians were progressively barred from holding honorable or profitable positions; and Theodosius felt justified in declaring that, since the Eunomians differentiated the nature of the Son from that of the Father, they would be unable to make wills or benefit from any testamentary gifts. The offense of the Manichaean heresy was considered so severe that it could only be atoned for by the offender's death; and the same capital punishment was imposed on the Audians, or Quartodecimans, who dared to commit the heinous act of celebrating Easter on the wrong day. Any Roman could exercise the right of public accusation; but the position of Inquisitors of the Faith, a title rightfully loathed, was first established during Theodosius's rule. However, it is said that the enforcement of his punitive laws was seldom applied; and the devout emperor seemed less eager to punish than to reclaim or intimidate his rebellious subjects.
The theory of persecution was established by Theodosius, whose justice and piety have been applauded by the saints: but the practice of it, in the fullest extent, was reserved for his rival and colleague, Maximus, the first, among the Christian princes, who shed the blood of his Christian subjects on account of their religious opinions. The cause of the Priscillianists, a recent sect of heretics, who disturbed the provinces of Spain, was transferred, by appeal, from the synod of Bordeaux to the Imperial consistory of Treves; and by the sentence of the Prætorian præfect, seven persons were tortured, condemned, and executed. The first of these was Priscillian himself, bishop of Avila, in Spain; who adorned the advantages of birth and fortune, by the accomplishments of eloquence and learning. Two presbyters, and two deacons, accompanied their beloved master in his death, which they esteemed as a glorious martyrdom; and the number of religious victims was completed by the execution of Latronian, a poet, who rivalled the fame of the ancients; and of Euchrocia, a noble matron of Bordeaux, the widow of the orator Delphidius. Two bishops who had embraced the sentiments of Priscillian, were condemned to a distant and dreary exile; and some indulgence was shown to the meaner criminals, who assumed the merit of an early repentance. If any credit could be allowed to confessions extorted by fear or pain, and to vague reports, the offspring of malice and credulity, the heresy of the Priscillianists would be found to include the various abominations of magic, of impiety, and of lewdness. Priscillian, who wandered about the world in the company of his spiritual sisters, was accused of praying stark naked in the midst of the congregation; and it was confidently asserted, that the effects of his criminal intercourse with the daughter of Euchrocia had been suppressed, by means still more odious and criminal. But an accurate, or rather a candid, inquiry will discover, that if the Priscillianists violated the laws of nature, it was not by the licentiousness, but by the austerity, of their lives. They absolutely condemned the use of the marriage-bed; and the peace of families was often disturbed by indiscreet separations. They enjoyed, or recommended, a total abstinence from all anima food; and their continual prayers, fasts, and vigils, inculcated a rule of strict and perfect devotion. The speculative tenets of the sect, concerning the person of Christ, and the nature of the human soul, were derived from the Gnostic and Manichæan system; and this vain philosophy, which had been transported from Egypt to Spain, was ill adapted to the grosser spirits of the West. The obscure disciples of Priscillian suffered languished, and gradually disappeared: his tenets were rejected by the clergy and people, but his death was the subject of a long and vehement controversy; while some arraigned, and others applauded, the justice of his sentence. It is with pleasure that we can observe the humane inconsistency of the most illustrious saints and bishops, Ambrose of Milan, and Martin of Tours, who, on this occasion, asserted the cause of toleration. They pitied the unhappy men, who had been executed at Treves; they refused to hold communion with their episcopal murderers; and if Martin deviated from that generous resolution, his motives were laudable, and his repentance was exemplary. The bishops of Tours and Milan pronounced, without hesitation, the eternal damnation of heretics; but they were surprised, and shocked, by the bloody image of their temporal death, and the honest feelings of nature resisted the artificial prejudices of theology. The humanity of Ambrose and Martin was confirmed by the scandalous irregularity of the proceedings against Priscillian and his adherents. The civil and ecclesiastical ministers had transgressed the limits of their respective provinces. The secular judge had presumed to receive an appeal, and to pronounce a definitive sentence, in a matter of faith, and episcopal jurisdiction. The bishops had disgraced themselves, by exercising the functions of accusers in a criminal prosecution. The cruelty of Ithacius, who beheld the tortures, and solicited the death, of the heretics, provoked the just indignation of mankind; and the vices of that profligate bishop were admitted as a proof, that his zeal was instigated by the sordid motives of interest. Since the death of Priscillian, the rude attempts of persecution have been refined and methodized in the holy office, which assigns their distinct parts to the ecclesiastical and secular powers. The devoted victim is regularly delivered by the priest to the magistrate, and by the magistrate to the executioner; and the inexorable sentence of the church, which declares the spiritual guilt of the offender, is expressed in the mild language of pity and intercession.
The theory of persecution was set forth by Theodosius, whose fairness and piety have been praised by the saints; but the full execution of it was left to his rival and colleague, Maximus, the first among Christian rulers to spill the blood of his Christian subjects because of their beliefs. The case of the Priscillianists, a recent sect of heretics who troubled the provinces of Spain, was moved by appeal from the synod of Bordeaux to the Imperial consistory of Treves; and by the judgment of the Praetorian prefect, seven people were tortured, condemned, and executed. The first of these was Priscillian himself, bishop of Avila in Spain, who combined the advantages of noble birth and wealth with the gifts of eloquence and knowledge. Two presbyters and two deacons chose to die alongside their beloved leader, viewing their deaths as a glorious martyrdom; the number of religious victims was completed with the execution of Latronian, a poet who rivaled the fame of the ancients, and Euchrocia, a noblewoman from Bordeaux, widow of the orator Delphidius. Two bishops who had joined Priscillian's beliefs were sentenced to faraway and harsh exile, while some leniency was offered to lesser offenders who claimed early repentance. If one could believe confessions forced by fear or pain, along with vague rumors based on malice and gullibility, the heresy of the Priscillianists would seem to encompass various evils like magic, impiety, and promiscuity. Priscillian, who traveled the world with his spiritual sisters, was accused of praying completely naked in front of the congregation; and it was confidently claimed that the results of his illicit affair with the daughter of Euchrocia were hidden through even more detestable and immoral means. However, a careful or rather honest inquiry would reveal that if the Priscillianists transgressed natural law, it was not through indulgence, but through the strictness of their lives. They entirely rejected the use of the marriage bed, and family harmony was often disrupted by inappropriate separations. They practiced or encouraged total abstinence from all animal food; and their continuous prayers, fasts, and vigils promoted a rule of strict and perfect devotion. The philosophical beliefs of the sect regarding the nature of Christ and the human soul were borrowed from Gnostic and Manichaean systems; and this empty philosophy, which had traveled from Egypt to Spain, was poorly suited for the more straightforward minds of the West. The obscure followers of Priscillian suffered and gradually faded away: his beliefs were dismissed by both clergy and laypeople, but his death sparked a long and heated debate; while some condemned, others praised the justice of his sentence. We can happily note the humane inconsistency of prominent saints and bishops, Ambrose of Milan and Martin of Tours, who, on this occasion, advocated for tolerance. They felt pity for the unfortunate men executed in Treves; they refused to commune with their episcopal murderers; and if Martin strayed from that noble decision, his reasons were commendable, and his remorse was genuine. The bishops of Tours and Milan swiftly declared the eternal damnation of heretics; yet, they were shocked and appalled by the brutal imagery of their physical death, and the natural feelings of humanity resisted the artificial biases of theology. The compassion of Ambrose and Martin was justified by the scandalous irregularities in the proceedings against Priscillian and his supporters. The civil and church authorities exceeded the boundaries of their respective roles. The secular judge overstepped by accepting an appeal and delivering a final sentence in a matter of faith and church authority. The bishops tarnished their reputations by taking on the role of accusers in a criminal trial. The cruelty of Ithacius, who witnessed the tortures and called for the deaths of the heretics, stirred justified outrage among the people; and his corrupt actions were seen as evidence that his zeal was driven by selfish interests. Since Priscillian's death, the crude practices of persecution have become more sophisticated and organized within the holy office, which delineates the roles of church and state. The devoted victim is formally handed over by the priest to the magistrate, and from the magistrate to the executioner; and the merciless judgment of the church, which pronounces the spiritual guilt of the accused, is conveyed in the gentle language of compassion and intercession.
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part III.
Among the ecclesiastics, who illustrated the reign of Theodosius, Gregory Nazianzen was distinguished by the talents of an eloquent preacher; the reputation of miraculous gifts added weight and dignity to the monastic virtues of Martin of Tours; but the palm of episcopal vigor and ability was justly claimed by the intrepid Ambrose. He was descended from a noble family of Romans; his father had exercised the important office of Prætorian præfect of Gaul; and the son, after passing through the studies of a liberal education, attained, in the regular gradation of civil honors, the station of consular of Liguria, a province which included the Imperial residence of Milan. At the age of thirty-four, and before he had received the sacrament of baptism, Ambrose, to his own surprise, and to that of the world, was suddenly transformed from a governor to an archbishop. Without the least mixture, as it is said, of art or intrigue, the whole body of the people unanimously saluted him with the episcopal title; the concord and perseverance of their acclamations were ascribed to a præternatural impulse; and the reluctant magistrate was compelled to undertake a spiritual office, for which he was not prepared by the habits and occupations of his former life. But the active force of his genius soon qualified him to exercise, with zeal and prudence, the duties of his ecclesiastical jurisdiction; and while he cheerfully renounced the vain and splendid trappings of temporal greatness, he condescended, for the good of the church, to direct the conscience of the emperors, and to control the administration of the empire. Gratian loved and revered him as a father; and the elaborate treatise on the faith of the Trinity was designed for the instruction of the young prince. After his tragic death, at a time when the empress Justina trembled for her own safety, and for that of her son Valentinian, the archbishop of Milan was despatched, on two different embassies, to the court of Treves. He exercised, with equal firmness and dexterity, the powers of his spiritual and political characters; and perhaps contributed, by his authority and eloquence, to check the ambition of Maximus, and to protect the peace of Italy. Ambrose had devoted his life, and his abilities, to the service of the church. Wealth was the object of his contempt; he had renounced his private patrimony; and he sold, without hesitation, the consecrated plate, for the redemption of captives. The clergy and people of Milan were attached to their archbishop; and he deserved the esteem, without soliciting the favor, or apprehending the displeasure, of his feeble sovereigns.
Among the church leaders who stood out during Theodosius's reign, Gregory Nazianzen was notable for his talent as an eloquent preacher; the reputation for performing miracles gave added weight and respect to the monastic virtues of Martin of Tours; but the undeniable recognition for pastoral strength and capability belonged to the fearless Ambrose. He came from a noble Roman family; his father held the significant position of Praetorian prefect of Gaul; and after completing a liberal education, he rose through the ranks of civil service to become the consul of Liguria, a province that included the Imperial city of Milan. At thirty-four, before receiving baptism, Ambrose was unexpectedly transformed from governor to archbishop, surprising himself and the world. Without any hint of deception or schemes, the entire populace unanimously honored him with the title of bishop; the unity and persistence of their acclaim were seen as a supernatural force; and the hesitant magistrate was compelled to take on a spiritual role for which he was unprepared due to his previous lifestyle. However, his innate genius quickly enabled him to perform with passion and wisdom the responsibilities of his ecclesiastical authority; while he willingly gave up the empty and lavish trappings of worldly power, he took it upon himself, for the benefit of the church, to guide the consciences of emperors and oversee the management of the empire. Gratian admired and respected him like a father; the detailed treatise on the Trinity's faith was meant to educate the young prince. Following his tragic death, at a time when Empress Justina feared for her safety and that of her son Valentinian, the Archbishop of Milan was sent on two separate missions to the court in Treves. He skillfully balanced his spiritual and political roles; and his influence and persuasive speech likely helped curb Maximus's ambitions and preserve peace in Italy. Ambrose dedicated his life and talents to the church. He looked down on wealth, renounced his personal inheritance, and without hesitation, sold the sacred vessels for the release of captives. The clergy and people of Milan were devoted to their archbishop; he earned their respect without seeking their favor or fearing the wrath of his weak rulers.
The government of Italy, and of the young emperor, naturally devolved to his mother Justina, a woman of beauty and spirit, but who, in the midst of an orthodox people, had the misfortune of professing the Arian heresy, which she endeavored to instil into the mind of her son. Justina was persuaded, that a Roman emperor might claim, in his own dominions, the public exercise of his religion; and she proposed to the archbishop, as a moderate and reasonable concession, that he should resign the use of a single church, either in the city or the suburbs of Milan. But the conduct of Ambrose was governed by very different principles. The palaces of the earth might indeed belong to Cæsar; but the churches were the houses of God; and, within the limits of his diocese, he himself, as the lawful successor of the apostles, was the only minister of God. The privileges of Christianity, temporal as well as spiritual, were confined to the true believers; and the mind of Ambrose was satisfied, that his own theological opinions were the standard of truth and orthodoxy. The archbishop, who refused to hold any conference, or negotiation, with the instruments of Satan, declared, with modest firmness, his resolution to die a martyr, rather than to yield to the impious sacrilege; and Justina, who resented the refusal as an act of insolence and rebellion, hastily determined to exert the Imperial prerogative of her son. As she desired to perform her public devotions on the approaching festival of Easter, Ambrose was ordered to appear before the council. He obeyed the summons with the respect of a faithful subject, but he was followed, without his consent, by an innumerable people; they pressed, with impetuous zeal, against the gates of the palace; and the affrighted ministers of Valentinian, instead of pronouncing a sentence of exile on the archbishop of Milan, humbly requested that he would interpose his authority, to protect the person of the emperor, and to restore the tranquility of the capital. But the promises which Ambrose received and communicated were soon violated by a perfidious court; and, during six of the most solemn days, which Christian piety had set apart for the exercise of religion, the city was agitated by the irregular convulsions of tumult and fanaticism. The officers of the household were directed to prepare, first, the Portian, and afterwards, the new, Basilica, for the immediate reception of the emperor and his mother. The splendid canopy and hangings of the royal seat were arranged in the customary manner; but it was found necessary to defend them by a strong guard, from the insults of the populace. The Arian ecclesiastics, who ventured to show themselves in the streets, were exposed to the most imminent danger of their lives; and Ambrose enjoyed the merit and reputation of rescuing his personal enemies from the hands of the enraged multitude.
The government of Italy, along with the young emperor, was naturally led by his mother Justina, a woman of beauty and spirit. However, in the midst of a traditional society, she unfortunately followed the Arian heresy and tried to instill it in her son. Justina believed that a Roman emperor could publicly practice his religion within his own realm. She suggested to the archbishop that a reasonable compromise would be for him to give up using just one church, either in the city or the suburbs of Milan. But Ambrose's approach was based on very different principles. While earthly palaces might belong to Caesar, churches were the houses of God. Within his diocese, he was the only rightful minister of God, as the legitimate successor of the apostles. The rights of Christianity, both earthly and spiritual, were reserved for true believers, and Ambrose felt that his theological views embodied the standard of truth and orthodoxy. The archbishop, refusing to engage in any discussions or negotiations with what he deemed as instruments of evil, declared firmly that he would rather die a martyr than give in to blasphemous sacrilege. Justina, perceiving his refusal as an act of defiance, quickly decided to exercise her son’s imperial authority. Wanting to fulfill her public religious duties for the upcoming Easter festival, she summoned Ambrose to appear before the council. He complied with the request respectfully, but he was unintentionally followed by a massive crowd. They pressed passionately against the palace gates, and the frightened ministers of Valentinian, instead of exiling Ambrose, humbly asked him to use his influence to ensure the emperor’s safety and restore calm to the city. However, the promises Ambrose received were soon betrayed by a treacherous court. For six of the most sacred days set aside for worship, the city was thrown into chaos due to unrest and fanaticism. The palace staff were instructed to prepare both the Portian and the new Basilica for the emperor and his mother’s arrival. The royal canopy and decorations were arranged as usual, but they had to be protected by a strong guard from the angry crowd. Arian clergy members who dared to appear in public faced great danger to their lives, and Ambrose earned praise for protecting his enemies from the fury of the mob.
But while he labored to restrain the effects of their zeal, the pathetic vehemence of his sermons continually inflamed the angry and seditious temper of the people of Milan. The characters of Eve, of the wife of Job, of Jezebel, of Herodias, were indecently applied to the mother of the emperor; and her desire to obtain a church for the Arians was compared to the most cruel persecutions which Christianity had endured under the reign of Paganism. The measures of the court served only to expose the magnitude of the evil. A fine of two hundred pounds of gold was imposed on the corporate body of merchants and manufacturers: an order was signified, in the name of the emperor, to all the officers, and inferior servants, of the courts of justice, that, during the continuance of the public disorders, they should strictly confine themselves to their houses; and the ministers of Valentinian imprudently confessed, that the most respectable part of the citizens of Milan was attached to the cause of their archbishop. He was again solicited to restore peace to his country, by timely compliance with the will of his sovereign. The reply of Ambrose was couched in the most humble and respectful terms, which might, however, be interpreted as a serious declaration of civil war. "His life and fortune were in the hands of the emperor; but he would never betray the church of Christ, or degrade the dignity of the episcopal character. In such a cause he was prepared to suffer whatever the malice of the dæmon could inflict; and he only wished to die in the presence of his faithful flock, and at the foot of the altar; he had not contributed to excite, but it was in the power of God alone to appease, the rage of the people: he deprecated the scenes of blood and confusion which were likely to ensue; and it was his fervent prayer, that he might not survive to behold the ruin of a flourishing city, and perhaps the desolation of all Italy." The obstinate bigotry of Justina would have endangered the empire of her son, if, in this contest with the church and people of Milan, she could have depended on the active obedience of the troops of the palace. A large body of Goths had marched to occupy the Basilica, which was the object of the dispute: and it might be expected from the Arian principles, and barbarous manners, of these foreign mercenaries, that they would not entertain any scruples in the execution of the most sanguinary orders. They were encountered, on the sacred threshold, by the archbishop, who, thundering against them a sentence of excommunication, asked them, in the tone of a father and a master, whether it was to invade the house of God, that they had implored the hospitable protection of the republic. The suspense of the Barbarians allowed some hours for a more effectual negotiation; and the empress was persuaded, by the advice of her wisest counsellors, to leave the Catholics in possession of all the churches of Milan; and to dissemble, till a more convenient season, her intentions of revenge. The mother of Valentinian could never forgive the triumph of Ambrose; and the royal youth uttered a passionate exclamation, that his own servants were ready to betray him into the hands of an insolent priest.
But while he worked to control the effects of their enthusiasm, the intense emotion of his sermons constantly stirred up the anger and rebellious spirit of the people of Milan. The figures of Eve, Job's wife, Jezebel, and Herodias were shamelessly referenced with regard to the emperor's mother; her desire to secure a church for the Arians was likened to the most brutal persecutions Christianity suffered under Pagan rule. The court's actions only highlighted the severity of the problem. A fine of two hundred pounds of gold was imposed on the group of merchants and manufacturers: an order was given, in the name of the emperor, to all officials and lower servants of the courts to stay confined to their homes during the chaos. Valentinian's ministers foolishly admitted that the most respected citizens of Milan supported their archbishop. He was urged once more to bring peace to his country by complying with his sovereign's wishes. Ambrose's response was framed in the most humble and respectful language, yet could be seen as a serious declaration of civil war. "His life and wealth were in the emperor's hands; but he would never betray the church of Christ or lower the dignity of the episcopal office. For such a cause, he was ready to endure whatever harm the devil could inflict; and he simply wished to die in front of his loyal flock, at the altar; he hadn’t instigated this conflict, but only God could calm the people's rage: he lamented the bloodshed and chaos likely to come; and it was his heartfelt prayer that he would not live to see the destruction of a thriving city, or perhaps all of Italy." Justina's stubborn intolerance could have jeopardized her son's empire if, in her battle against the church and people of Milan, she could have relied on the active support of the palace troops. A significant group of Goths had come to occupy the Basilica, which was at the center of the dispute: given the Arian beliefs and brutal ways of these mercenaries, it was expected they would have no qualms about following bloody orders. They were confronted at the sacred threshold by the archbishop, who, delivering a thunderous excommunication, asked them, in a fatherly and authoritative tone, whether they had come to invade God's house after seeking the republic's protection. The hesitation of the Barbarians allowed for a few hours of more effective negotiation; and the empress was persuaded, by her wisest advisors, to let the Catholics keep all the churches in Milan and to hide her revenge plans until a better time. Valentinian's mother could never forgive Ambrose's victory; and the young royal exclaimed passionately that his own servants were ready to betray him to a disrespectful priest.
The laws of the empire, some of which were inscribed with the name of Valentinian, still condemned the Arian heresy, and seemed to excuse the resistance of the Catholics. By the influence of Justina, an edict of toleration was promulgated in all the provinces which were subject to the court of Milan; the free exercise of their religion was granted to those who professed the faith of Rimini; and the emperor declared, that all persons who should infringe this sacred and salutary constitution, should be capitally punished, as the enemies of the public peace. The character and language of the archbishop of Milan may justify the suspicion, that his conduct soon afforded a reasonable ground, or at least a specious pretence, to the Arian ministers; who watched the opportunity of surprising him in some act of disobedience to a law which he strangely represents as a law of blood and tyranny. A sentence of easy and honorable banishment was pronounced, which enjoined Ambrose to depart from Milan without delay; whilst it permitted him to choose the place of his exile, and the number of his companions. But the authority of the saints, who have preached and practised the maxims of passive loyalty, appeared to Ambrose of less moment than the extreme and pressing danger of the church. He boldly refused to obey; and his refusal was supported by the unanimous consent of his faithful people. They guarded by turns the person of their archbishop; the gates of the cathedral and the episcopal palace were strongly secured; and the Imperial troops, who had formed the blockade, were unwilling to risk the attack, of that impregnable fortress. The numerous poor, who had been relieved by the liberality of Ambrose, embraced the fair occasion of signalizing their zeal and gratitude; and as the patience of the multitude might have been exhausted by the length and uniformity of nocturnal vigils, he prudently introduced into the church of Milan the useful institution of a loud and regular psalmody. While he maintained this arduous contest, he was instructed, by a dream, to open the earth in a place where the remains of two martyrs, Gervasius and Protasius, had been deposited above three hundred years. Immediately under the pavement of the church two perfect skeletons were found, with the heads separated from their bodies, and a plentiful effusion of blood. The holy relics were presented, in solemn pomp, to the veneration of the people; and every circumstance of this fortunate discovery was admirably adapted to promote the designs of Ambrose. The bones of the martyrs, their blood, their garments, were supposed to contain a healing power; and the præternatural influence was communicated to the most distant objects, without losing any part of its original virtue. The extraordinary cure of a blind man, and the reluctant confessions of several dæmoniacs, appeared to justify the faith and sanctity of Ambrose; and the truth of those miracles is attested by Ambrose himself, by his secretary Paulinus, and by his proselyte, the celebrated Augustin, who, at that time, professed the art of rhetoric in Milan. The reason of the present age may possibly approve the incredulity of Justina and her Arian court; who derided the theatrical representations which were exhibited by the contrivance, and at the expense, of the archbishop. Their effect, however, on the minds of the people, was rapid and irresistible; and the feeble sovereign of Italy found himself unable to contend with the favorite of Heaven. The powers likewise of the earth interposed in the defence of Ambrose: the disinterested advice of Theodosius was the genuine result of piety and friendship; and the mask of religious zeal concealed the hostile and ambitious designs of the tyrant of Gaul.
The laws of the empire, some of which were inscribed with Valentinian's name, still condemned the Arian heresy and seemed to excuse the resistance of Catholics. Influenced by Justina, an edict of tolerance was issued in all the provinces under the Milan court; those who followed the faith of Rimini were granted the freedom to practice their religion, and the emperor declared that anyone who violated this sacred and beneficial rule would be punished with death as enemies of public peace. The character and language of the archbishop of Milan might raise suspicions that his actions soon provided reasonable grounds, or at least a plausible excuse, for the Arian ministers, who were on the lookout for a chance to catch him disobeying a law he bizarrely described as one of blood and tyranny. An easy and honorable banishment order was issued, commanding Ambrose to leave Milan immediately, while allowing him to choose his place of exile and the number of companions. However, Ambrose felt that the authority of saints, who had preached and practiced passive loyalty, was less important than the immediate and pressing danger to the church. He boldly refused to comply, and his refusal was backed by the unanimous support of his loyal followers. They took turns protecting their archbishop; the gates of the cathedral and the episcopal palace were heavily secured, and the Imperial troops, who had set up a blockade, were hesitant to risk attacking that invulnerable stronghold. The many poor people whom Ambrose had helped took the opportunity to show their zeal and gratitude; and as the crowd's patience might have been wearing thin due to the length of nighttime vigils, he wisely introduced the practice of loud and organized psalm singing in the church of Milan. During this difficult struggle, he was guided by a dream to excavate a spot where the remains of two martyrs, Gervasius and Protasius, had been buried for over three hundred years. Beneath the church’s pavement, they discovered two complete skeletons with their heads separated from their bodies and a significant amount of blood. The holy relics were solemnly presented for the veneration of the people, and every detail of this fortunate discovery perfectly served Ambrose's purposes. The bones of the martyrs, their blood, and their garments were believed to have healing powers; this supernatural influence was thought to extend to distant objects without losing any of its original potency. The remarkable healing of a blind man and the reluctant confessions of several possessed individuals seemed to validate Ambrose's faith and holiness; and the truth of these miracles is confirmed by Ambrose himself, his secretary Paulinus, and his convert Augustine, who at that time was teaching rhetoric in Milan. The rational view of the present age might support Justina's and her Arian court's disbelief, who mocked the dramatic displays orchestrated by the archbishop. However, their effect on the people was swift and undeniable; and the weak ruler of Italy found himself unable to compete with Heaven's favored one. Earthly powers also intervened to defend Ambrose: Theodosius's selfless advice stemmed genuinely from piety and friendship, while the guise of religious fervor concealed the hostile and ambitious intentions of the tyrant of Gaul.
The reign of Maximus might have ended in peace and prosperity, could he have contented himself with the possession of three ample countries, which now constitute the three most flourishing kingdoms of modern Europe. But the aspiring usurper, whose sordid ambition was not dignified by the love of glory and of arms, considered his actual forces as the instruments only of his future greatness, and his success was the immediate cause of his destruction. The wealth which he extorted from the oppressed provinces of Gaul, Spain, and Britain, was employed in levying and maintaining a formidable army of Barbarians, collected, for the most part, from the fiercest nations of Germany. The conquest of Italy was the object of his hopes and preparations: and he secretly meditated the ruin of an innocent youth, whose government was abhorred and despised by his Catholic subjects. But as Maximus wished to occupy, without resistance, the passes of the Alps, he received, with perfidious smiles, Domninus of Syria, the ambassador of Valentinian, and pressed him to accept the aid of a considerable body of troops, for the service of a Pannonian war. The penetration of Ambrose had discovered the snares of an enemy under the professions of friendship; but the Syrian Domninus was corrupted, or deceived, by the liberal favor of the court of Treves; and the council of Milan obstinately rejected the suspicion of danger, with a blind confidence, which was the effect, not of courage, but of fear. The march of the auxiliaries was guided by the ambassador; and they were admitted, without distrust, into the fortresses of the Alps. But the crafty tyrant followed, with hasty and silent footsteps, in the rear; and, as he diligently intercepted all intelligence of his motions, the gleam of armor, and the dust excited by the troops of cavalry, first announced the hostile approach of a stranger to the gates of Milan. In this extremity, Justina and her son might accuse their own imprudence, and the perfidious arts of Maximus; but they wanted time, and force, and resolution, to stand against the Gauls and Germans, either in the field, or within the walls of a large and disaffected city. Flight was their only hope, Aquileia their only refuge; and as Maximus now displayed his genuine character, the brother of Gratian might expect the same fate from the hands of the same assassin. Maximus entered Milan in triumph; and if the wise archbishop refused a dangerous and criminal connection with the usurper, he might indirectly contribute to the success of his arms, by inculcating, from the pulpit, the duty of resignation, rather than that of resistance. The unfortunate Justina reached Aquileia in safety; but she distrusted the strength of the fortifications: she dreaded the event of a siege; and she resolved to implore the protection of the great Theodosius, whose power and virtue were celebrated in all the countries of the West. A vessel was secretly provided to transport the Imperial family; they embarked with precipitation in one of the obscure harbors of Venetia, or Istria; traversed the whole extent of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas; turned the extreme promontory of Peloponnesus; and, after a long, but successful navigation, reposed themselves in the port of Thessalonica. All the subjects of Valentinian deserted the cause of a prince, who, by his abdication, had absolved them from the duty of allegiance; and if the little city of Æmona, on the verge of Italy, had not presumed to stop the career of his inglorious victory, Maximus would have obtained, without a struggle, the sole possession of the Western empire.
The reign of Maximus could have ended in peace and prosperity if he had been satisfied with controlling three large territories, which now make up the three most thriving kingdoms of modern Europe. However, the ambitious usurper, whose greed did not come with a noble desire for glory or military success, viewed his current forces merely as tools for his future greatness, and his success ultimately led to his downfall. The wealth he extracted from the oppressed regions of Gaul, Spain, and Britain was used to raise and maintain a powerful army of Barbarians, mostly gathered from the fiercest tribes of Germany. He aimed to conquer Italy and secretly plotted against an innocent young ruler, who was hated and looked down upon by his Catholic subjects. Wanting to take the Alpine passes without resistance, Maximus deceitfully welcomed Domninus of Syria, the ambassador of Valentinian, and urged him to accept substantial military support for a campaign in Pannonia. Ambrose's insight revealed the traps laid by the enemy disguised as friends, but Domninus was either bribed or misled by the generous favors from the court in Treves, while the council in Milan stubbornly dismissed the threat with a blind trust that stemmed not from bravery, but from fear. The march of the troops was directed by the ambassador, and they were allowed into the Alpine fortresses without suspicion. Meanwhile, the cunning tyrant followed closely behind, moving quickly and quietly; as he skillfully cut off all news of his movements, the sight of armor and the dust raised by the cavalry were the first signs of a hostile stranger approaching the gates of Milan. In this dire situation, Justina and her son could blame their own naivety and Maximus's treacherous tactics, but they lacked the time, strength, and resolve to confront the Gauls and Germans in battle, or even within the walls of a large and disloyal city. Their only hope was to flee to Aquileia; and as Maximus revealed his true nature, Gratian's brother could expect the same fate at the hands of the same assassin. Maximus entered Milan in triumph, and although the wise archbishop avoided a dangerous partnership with the usurper, he might have indirectly helped his military success by preaching from the pulpit about the duty of resignation rather than resistance. The unfortunate Justina reached Aquileia safely, but she doubted the strength of its defenses, feared the outcome of a siege, and decided to seek the protection of the powerful and virtuous Theodosius, renowned throughout the Western territories. A ship was secretly arranged to transport the Imperial family; they hurriedly boarded at one of the lesser-known ports of Venetia or Istria, crossed the entire Adriatic and Ionian Seas, rounded the tip of Peloponnesus, and, after a long but successful journey, found rest in the port of Thessalonica. All of Valentinian's subjects abandoned the cause of a prince who, by stepping down, had freed them from their loyalty; and if the small city of Æmona, on the edge of Italy, hadn't dared to halt the progress of his shameful victory, Maximus would have taken sole control of the Western Empire without a fight.
Instead of inviting his royal guests to take the palace of Constantinople, Theodosius had some unknown reasons to fix their residence at Thessalonica; but these reasons did not proceed from contempt or indifference, as he speedily made a visit to that city, accompanied by the greatest part of his court and senate. After the first tender expressions of friendship and sympathy, the pious emperor of the East gently admonished Justina, that the guilt of heresy was sometimes punished in this world, as well as in the next; and that the public profession of the Nicene faith would be the most efficacious step to promote the restoration of her son, by the satisfaction which it must occasion both on earth and in heaven. The momentous question of peace or war was referred, by Theodosius, to the deliberation of his council; and the arguments which might be alleged on the side of honor and justice, had acquired, since the death of Gratian, a considerable degree of additional weight. The persecution of the Imperial family, to which Theodosius himself had been indebted for his fortune, was now aggravated by recent and repeated injuries. Neither oaths nor treaties could restrain the boundless ambition of Maximus; and the delay of vigorous and decisive measures, instead of prolonging the blessings of peace, would expose the Eastern empire to the danger of a hostile invasion. The Barbarians, who had passed the Danube, had lately assumed the character of soldiers and subjects, but their native fierceness was yet untamed: and the operations of a war, which would exercise their valor, and diminish their numbers, might tend to relieve the provinces from an intolerable oppression. Notwithstanding these specious and solid reasons, which were approved by a majority of the council, Theodosius still hesitated whether he should draw the sword in a contest which could no longer admit any terms of reconciliation; and his magnanimous character was not disgraced by the apprehensions which he felt for the safety of his infant sons, and the welfare of his exhausted people. In this moment of anxious doubt, while the fate of the Roman world depended on the resolution of a single man, the charms of the princess Galla most powerfully pleaded the cause of her brother Valentinian. The heart of Theodosius was softened by the tears of beauty; his affections were insensibly engaged by the graces of youth and innocence: the art of Justina managed and directed the impulse of passion; and the celebration of the royal nuptials was the assurance and signal of the civil war. The unfeeling critics, who consider every amorous weakness as an indelible stain on the memory of a great and orthodox emperor, are inclined, on this occasion, to dispute the suspicious evidence of the historian Zosimus. For my own part, I shall frankly confess, that I am willing to find, or even to seek, in the revolutions of the world, some traces of the mild and tender sentiments of domestic life; and amidst the crowd of fierce and ambitious conquerors, I can distinguish, with peculiar complacency, a gentle hero, who may be supposed to receive his armor from the hands of love. The alliance of the Persian king was secured by the faith of treaties; the martial Barbarians were persuaded to follow the standard, or to respect the frontiers, of an active and liberal monarch; and the dominions of Theodosius, from the Euphrates to the Adriatic, resounded with the preparations of war both by land and sea. The skilful disposition of the forces of the East seemed to multiply their numbers, and distracted the attention of Maximus. He had reason to fear, that a chosen body of troops, under the command of the intrepid Arbogastes, would direct their march along the banks of the Danube, and boldly penetrate through the Rhætian provinces into the centre of Gaul. A powerful fleet was equipped in the harbors of Greece and Epirus, with an apparent design, that, as soon as the passage had been opened by a naval victory, Valentinian and his mother should land in Italy, proceed, without delay, to Rome, and occupy the majestic seat of religion and empire. In the mean while, Theodosius himself advanced at the head of a brave and disciplined army, to encounter his unworthy rival, who, after the siege of Æmona, had fixed his camp in the neighborhood of Siscia, a city of Pannonia, strongly fortified by the broad and rapid stream of the Save.
Instead of inviting his royal guests to stay at the palace in Constantinople, Theodosius had unknown reasons for settling them in Thessalonica; however, these reasons didn't stem from disdain or indifference, as he quickly paid a visit to that city, accompanied by most of his court and senate. After exchanging warm words of friendship and sympathy, the devout emperor of the East gently reminded Justina that heresy could sometimes be punished in this life as well as the next; and that publicly professing the Nicene faith would be the most effective step to help restore her son, by creating satisfaction both on earth and in heaven. The serious question of peace or war was left for Theodosius's council to discuss; and the arguments for honor and justice had gained significant weight since Gratian's death. The persecution of the Imperial family, which had contributed to Theodosius's rise, was now intensified by recent and repeated offenses. Neither oaths nor treaties could contain the limitless ambition of Maximus; and delaying decisive action, instead of preserving peace, would expose the Eastern empire to the risk of invasion. The Barbarians, who had crossed the Danube, had recently taken on the roles of soldiers and subjects, but their wild nature was still unbroken: waging war could test their courage and reduce their numbers, potentially easing unbearable oppression in the provinces. Despite these appealing and solid reasons, supported by most of the council, Theodosius hesitated about taking up arms in a conflict that could no longer have reconciliatory terms; his noble character was not diminished by his concern for the safety of his young sons and the welfare of his weary people. In this moment of anxious uncertainty, while the fate of the Roman world rested on one man's decision, the charm of Princess Galla strongly advocated for her brother Valentinian. Theodosius's heart was softened by her tears; he became unwittingly drawn to her youthful grace and innocence: Justina's clever manipulation guided his emotions; and the celebration of royal nuptials marked the beginning of civil war. Critics who view any romantic weakness as a permanent blemish on the legacy of a great and upright emperor tend to challenge the dubious accounts of the historian Zosimus. Personally, I admit I am inclined to find, or even look for, instances of gentle and tender domestic feelings in the upheavals of the world; and among the multitude of fierce and ambitious conquerors, I can distinctly appreciate a gentle hero, who might be seen as receiving his armor from love itself. The Persian king's alliance was secured by treaty commitments; the warrior Barbarians were persuaded to follow the banner or respect the borders of an active and generous monarch; and Theodosius's territories, stretching from the Euphrates to the Adriatic, buzzed with preparations for war on both land and sea. The strategic organization of the Eastern forces seemed to increase their perceived strength and diverted Maximus's attention. He had reason to fear that a selected cohort of troops, led by the fearless Arbogastes, would march along the Danube's banks and boldly push through the Rhætian provinces into the heart of Gaul. A formidable fleet was outfitted in the harbors of Greece and Epirus, seemingly intended for the moment when a naval victory would clear the way for Valentinian and his mother to land in Italy, make their way to Rome, and take up the grand seat of religion and empire. Meanwhile, Theodosius himself advanced at the head of a brave and disciplined army, ready to face his unworthy rival, who had set up camp near Siscia, a fortified city in Pannonia, after laying siege to Æmona.
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part IV
The veterans, who still remembered the long resistance, and successive resources, of the tyrant Magnentius, might prepare themselves for the labors of three bloody campaigns. But the contest with his successor, who, like him, had usurped the throne of the West, was easily decided in the term of two months, and within the space of two hundred miles. The superior genius of the emperor of the East might prevail over the feeble Maximus, who, in this important crisis, showed himself destitute of military skill, or personal courage; but the abilities of Theodosius were seconded by the advantage which he possessed of a numerous and active cavalry. The Huns, the Alani, and, after their example, the Goths themselves, were formed into squadrons of archers; who fought on horseback, and confounded the steady valor of the Gauls and Germans, by the rapid motions of a Tartar war. After the fatigue of a long march, in the heat of summer, they spurred their foaming horses into the waters of the Save, swam the river in the presence of the enemy, and instantly charged and routed the troops who guarded the high ground on the opposite side. Marcellinus, the tyrant's brother, advanced to support them with the select cohorts, which were considered as the hope and strength of the army. The action, which had been interrupted by the approach of night, was renewed in the morning; and, after a sharp conflict, the surviving remnant of the bravest soldiers of Maximus threw down their arms at the feet of the conqueror. Without suspending his march, to receive the loyal acclamations of the citizens of Æmona, Theodosius pressed forwards to terminate the war by the death or captivity of his rival, who fled before him with the diligence of fear. From the summit of the Julian Alps, he descended with such incredible speed into the plain of Italy, that he reached Aquileia on the evening of the first day; and Maximus, who found himself encompassed on all sides, had scarcely time to shut the gates of the city. But the gates could not long resist the effort of a victorious enemy; and the despair, the disaffection, the indifference of the soldiers and people, hastened the downfall of the wretched Maximus. He was dragged from his throne, rudely stripped of the Imperial ornaments, the robe, the diadem, and the purple slippers; and conducted, like a malefactor, to the camp and presence of Theodosius, at a place about three miles from Aquileia. The behavior of the emperor was not intended to insult, and he showed disposition to pity and forgive, the tyrant of the West, who had never been his personal enemy, and was now become the object of his contempt. Our sympathy is the most forcibly excited by the misfortunes to which we are exposed; and the spectacle of a proud competitor, now prostrate at his feet, could not fail of producing very serious and solemn thoughts in the mind of the victorious emperor. But the feeble emotion of involuntary pity was checked by his regard for public justice, and the memory of Gratian; and he abandoned the victim to the pious zeal of the soldiers, who drew him out of the Imperial presence, and instantly separated his head from his body. The intelligence of his defeat and death was received with sincere or well-dissembled joy: his son Victor, on whom he had conferred the title of Augustus, died by the order, perhaps by the hand, of the bold Arbogastes; and all the military plans of Theodosius were successfully executed. When he had thus terminated the civil war, with less difficulty and bloodshed than he might naturally expect, he employed the winter months of his residence at Milan, to restore the state of the afflicted provinces; and early in the spring he made, after the example of Constantine and Constantius, his triumphal entry into the ancient capital of the Roman empire.
The veterans, who still remembered the long struggle and continuous efforts against the tyrant Magnentius, prepared themselves for the challenges of three bloody campaigns. However, the conflict with his successor, who had similarly seized the throne of the West, was resolved in just two months and within two hundred miles. The superior intelligence of the Eastern emperor outmatched the weak Maximus, who, during this crucial moment, displayed a lack of military skill and personal bravery; yet Theodosius's abilities were bolstered by the advantage of a large and agile cavalry. The Huns, the Alani, and, following their lead, the Goths formed into units of archers, fought on horseback, and overwhelmed the steadfast bravery of the Gauls and Germans with the swift tactics of Tartar warfare. After a long march in the summer heat, they drove their exhausted horses into the waters of the Save, swam the river in front of the enemy, and quickly charged and defeated the troops guarding the high ground on the other side. Marcellinus, the brother of the tyrant, advanced to support them with the elite cohorts deemed the hope and strength of the army. The battle, interrupted by nightfall, resumed in the morning; and after a fierce confrontation, the surviving remnants of Maximus's bravest soldiers laid down their arms at the feet of the conqueror. Without pausing to receive the grateful cheers of the citizens of Æmona, Theodosius pressed on to end the war by capturing or killing his rival, who fled from him out of fear. Descending from the Julian Alps with incredible speed, he reached the plain of Italy and arrived in Aquileia on the evening of the first day; Maximus, now surrounded, barely managed to shut the city gates. But the gates couldn't hold back the efforts of a victorious enemy for long; the despair, discontent, and apathy of the soldiers and the people hastened the downfall of the unfortunate Maximus. He was dragged from his throne, crudely stripped of the imperial regalia—the robe, diadem, and purple slippers—and taken, like a criminal, to Theodosius's camp, about three miles from Aquileia. The emperor’s demeanor was not meant to insult; he showed a willingness to pity and forgive the tyrant of the West, who had never been his personal foe but had now become an object of his disdain. Our sympathy is most strongly stirred by the misfortunes we experience, and seeing a once-proud competitor now humbled at his feet could not help but evoke serious thoughts in the victorious emperor. However, the fleeting feeling of involuntary pity was overcome by his sense of public justice and the memory of Gratian, leading him to abandon the captured tyrant to the fervent justice of the soldiers, who dragged him away from the emperor’s presence and swiftly executed him. News of his defeat and death was met with genuine or feigned joy: his son Victor, whom he had named Augustus, died by the order, possibly at the hands, of the bold Arbogastes; and all of Theodosius's military strategies were carried out successfully. Having ended the civil war with less difficulty and bloodshed than he might have expected, he used the winter months of his stay in Milan to restore the state of the suffering provinces; and early in the spring, following the precedent set by Constantine and Constantius, he made his triumphant entry into the ancient capital of the Roman Empire.
The orator, who may be silent without danger, may praise without difficulty, and without reluctance; and posterity will confess, that the character of Theodosius might furnish the subject of a sincere and ample panegyric. The wisdom of his laws, and the success of his arms, rendered his administration respectable in the eyes both of his subjects and of his enemies. He loved and practised the virtues of domestic life, which seldom hold their residence in the palaces of kings. Theodosius was chaste and temperate; he enjoyed, without excess, the sensual and social pleasures of the table; and the warmth of his amorous passions was never diverted from their lawful objects. The proud titles of Imperial greatness were adorned by the tender names of a faithful husband, an indulgent father; his uncle was raised, by his affectionate esteem, to the rank of a second parent: Theodosius embraced, as his own, the children of his brother and sister; and the expressions of his regard were extended to the most distant and obscure branches of his numerous kindred. His familiar friends were judiciously selected from among those persons, who, in the equal intercourse of private life, had appeared before his eyes without a mask; the consciousness of personal and superior merit enabled him to despise the accidental distinction of the purple; and he proved by his conduct, that he had forgotten all the injuries, while he most gratefully remembered all the favors and services, which he had received before he ascended the throne of the Roman empire. The serious or lively tone of his conversation was adapted to the age, the rank, or the character of his subjects, whom he admitted into his society; and the affability of his manners displayed the image of his mind. Theodosius respected the simplicity of the good and virtuous: every art, every talent, of a useful, or even of an innocent nature, was rewarded by his judicious liberality; and, except the heretics, whom he persecuted with implacable hatred, the diffusive circle of his benevolence was circumscribed only by the limits of the human race. The government of a mighty empire may assuredly suffice to occupy the time, and the abilities, of a mortal: yet the diligent prince, without aspiring to the unsuitable reputation of profound learning, always reserved some moments of his leisure for the instructive amusement of reading. History, which enlarged his experience, was his favorite study. The annals of Rome, in the long period of eleven hundred years, presented him with a various and splendid picture of human life: and it has been particularly observed, that whenever he perused the cruel acts of Cinna, of Marius, or of Sylla, he warmly expressed his generous detestation of those enemies of humanity and freedom. His disinterested opinion of past events was usefully applied as the rule of his own actions; and Theodosius has deserved the singular commendation, that his virtues always seemed to expand with his fortune: the season of his prosperity was that of his moderation; and his clemency appeared the most conspicuous after the danger and success of a civil war. The Moorish guards of the tyrant had been massacred in the first heat of the victory, and a small number of the most obnoxious criminals suffered the punishment of the law. But the emperor showed himself much more attentive to relieve the innocent than to chastise the guilty. The oppressed subjects of the West, who would have deemed themselves happy in the restoration of their lands, were astonished to receive a sum of money equivalent to their losses; and the liberality of the conqueror supported the aged mother, and educated the orphan daughters, of Maximus. A character thus accomplished might almost excuse the extravagant supposition of the orator Pacatus; that, if the elder Brutus could be permitted to revisit the earth, the stern republican would abjure, at the feet of Theodosius, his hatred of kings; and ingenuously confess, that such a monarch was the most faithful guardian of the happiness and dignity of the Roman people.
The speaker, who can remain silent without any risk, can easily and willingly offer praise; and future generations will acknowledge that Theodosius's character deserves a sincere and detailed tribute. The wisdom of his laws and the success of his military endeavors made his rule respectable to both his subjects and his foes. He cherished and embodied the virtues of family life, which are rarely found in royal palaces. Theodosius was pure and moderate; he enjoyed the pleasures of dining without excess, and his passionate affections were never misdirected. The lofty titles of Imperial authority were complemented by the tender roles of a devoted husband and a caring father; his uncle was regarded by him as a second parent due to his warm regard. Theodosius embraced the children of his brother and sister as his own, extending his affection to the farthest and least significant branches of his extensive family. His close friends were thoughtfully chosen from those who had presented themselves to him without pretense in the egalitarian setting of private life; aware of their own genuine worth, he was able to overlook the accidental privilege of wearing the purple. He demonstrated through his actions that he had moved on from all past grievances while sincerely appreciating the favors and services he received before becoming the ruler of the Roman Empire. His style of conversation, whether serious or lighthearted, was appropriately adjusted to the age, status, or character of the individuals he welcomed into his circle; the friendliness of his demeanor reflected his inner self. Theodosius respected the simplicity of good and virtuous people: every skill or talent that was useful or even innocuous was rewarded by his generous fairness; and aside from the heretics, whom he pursued with relentless hatred, the extensive reach of his kindness was limited only by the boundaries of humanity. Leading a vast empire certainly requires the time and abilities of a mortal being; yet the diligent prince, without seeking the inappropriate reputation of deep scholarship, always set aside moments of leisure for the enlightening pleasure of reading. History, which broadened his understanding, was his preferred subject. The chronicles of Rome over eleven hundred years provided him with a diverse and striking view of human life: it was noted that whenever he read about the brutal actions of Cinna, Marius, or Sulla, he expressed strong disdain for those enemies of humanity and freedom. His unbiased view of historical events served as a valuable guide for his own actions; and Theodosius earned the notable praise that his virtues seemed to grow with his fortunes: his period of prosperity was also one of moderation, and his kindness was most evident after the crises and successes of civil war. The Moorish guards of the tyrant were slaughtered in the initial rush of victory, and only a few of the most notorious criminals faced legal punishment. However, the emperor was far more focused on helping the innocent than punishing the guilty. The oppressed subjects in the West, who would have considered themselves fortunate just to regain their lands, were astonished to receive compensation for their losses; and the generosity of the conqueror supported the elderly mother and educated the orphaned daughters of Maximus. Such a well-rounded character might almost justify the extravagant notion of the orator Pacatus; that, if the elder Brutus could return to Earth, the stern republican would renounce, at Theodosius's feet, his disdain for kings and honestly admit that such a monarch would be the staunchest protector of the happiness and dignity of the Roman people.
Yet the piercing eye of the founder of the republic must have discerned two essential imperfections, which might, perhaps, have abated his recent love of despotism. The virtuous mind of Theodosius was often relaxed by indolence, and it was sometimes inflamed by passion. In the pursuit of an important object, his active courage was capable of the most vigorous exertions; but, as soon as the design was accomplished, or the danger was surmounted, the hero sunk into inglorious repose; and, forgetful that the time of a prince is the property of his people, resigned himself to the enjoyment of the innocent, but trifling, pleasures of a luxurious court. The natural disposition of Theodosius was hasty and choleric; and, in a station where none could resist, and few would dissuade, the fatal consequence of his resentment, the humane monarch was justly alarmed by the consciousness of his infirmity and of his power. It was the constant study of his life to suppress, or regulate, the intemperate sallies of passion and the success of his efforts enhanced the merit of his clemency. But the painful virtue which claims the merit of victory, is exposed to the danger of defeat; and the reign of a wise and merciful prince was polluted by an act of cruelty which would stain the annals of Nero or Domitian. Within the space of three years, the inconsistent historian of Theodosius must relate the generous pardon of the citizens of Antioch, and the inhuman massacre of the people of Thessalonica.
Yet the sharp eye of the founder of the republic must have noticed two key flaws that might have softened his recent desire for tyranny. The virtuous nature of Theodosius often gave way to laziness and was sometimes ignited by passion. In the pursuit of a significant goal, his active bravery could lead to the most vigorous efforts; however, once the objective was achieved or the threat was overcome, he would fall into unremarkable idleness, forgetting that a prince's time belongs to his people, and he would indulge in the innocent but trivial pleasures of a lavish court. Theodosius had a quick and fiery temperament; in a position where no one could resist him and few would advise against him, he was rightly troubled by the awareness of his weaknesses and his power. It was his lifelong effort to suppress or manage the uncontrollable bursts of passion, and the success of those efforts made his clemency all the more commendable. But the painful virtue that seeks the reward of triumph is vulnerable to the risk of failure; thus, the reign of a wise and compassionate prince was tainted by an act of cruelty that would tarnish the records of Nero or Domitian. In just three years, the inconsistent chronicler of Theodosius must recount both the generous pardon of the citizens of Antioch and the brutal massacre of the people of Thessalonica.
The lively impatience of the inhabitants of Antioch was never satisfied with their own situation, or with the character and conduct of their successive sovereigns. The Arian subjects of Theodosius deplored the loss of their churches; and as three rival bishops disputed the throne of Antioch, the sentence which decided their pretensions excited the murmurs of the two unsuccessful congregations. The exigencies of the Gothic war, and the inevitable expense that accompanied the conclusion of the peace, had constrained the emperor to aggravate the weight of the public impositions; and the provinces of Asia, as they had not been involved in the distress were the less inclined to contribute to the relief, of Europe. The auspicious period now approached of the tenth year of his reign; a festival more grateful to the soldiers, who received a liberal donative, than to the subjects, whose voluntary offerings had been long since converted into an extraordinary and oppressive burden. The edicts of taxation interrupted the repose, and pleasures, of Antioch; and the tribunal of the magistrate was besieged by a suppliant crowd; who, in pathetic, but, at first, in respectful language, solicited the redress of their grievances. They were gradually incensed by the pride of their haughty rulers, who treated their complaints as a criminal resistance; their satirical wit degenerated into sharp and angry invectives; and, from the subordinate powers of government, the invectives of the people insensibly rose to attack the sacred character of the emperor himself. Their fury, provoked by a feeble opposition, discharged itself on the images of the Imperial family, which were erected, as objects of public veneration, in the most conspicuous places of the city. The statues of Theodosius, of his father, of his wife Flaccilla, of his two sons, Arcadius and Honorius, were insolently thrown down from their pedestals, broken in pieces, or dragged with contempt through the streets; and the indignities which were offered to the representations of Imperial majesty, sufficiently declared the impious and treasonable wishes of the populace. The tumult was almost immediately suppressed by the arrival of a body of archers: and Antioch had leisure to reflect on the nature and consequences of her crime. According to the duty of his office, the governor of the province despatched a faithful narrative of the whole transaction: while the trembling citizens intrusted the confession of their crime, and the assurances of their repentance, to the zeal of Flavian, their bishop, and to the eloquence of the senator Hilarius, the friend, and most probably the disciple, of Libanius; whose genius, on this melancholy occasion, was not useless to his country. But the two capitals, Antioch and Constantinople, were separated by the distance of eight hundred miles; and, notwithstanding the diligence of the Imperial posts, the guilty city was severely punished by a long and dreadful interval of suspense. Every rumor agitated the hopes and fears of the Antiochians, and they heard with terror, that their sovereign, exasperated by the insult which had been offered to his own statues, and more especially, to those of his beloved wife, had resolved to level with the ground the offending city; and to massacre, without distinction of age or sex, the criminal inhabitants; many of whom were actually driven, by their apprehensions, to seek a refuge in the mountains of Syria, and the adjacent desert. At length, twenty-four days after the sedition, the general Hellebicus and Cæsarius, master of the offices, declared the will of the emperor, and the sentence of Antioch. That proud capital was degraded from the rank of a city; and the metropolis of the East, stripped of its lands, its privileges, and its revenues, was subjected, under the humiliating denomination of a village, to the jurisdiction of Laodicea. The baths, the Circus, and the theatres were shut: and, that every source of plenty and pleasure might at the same time be intercepted, the distribution of corn was abolished, by the severe instructions of Theodosius. His commissioners then proceeded to inquire into the guilt of individuals; of those who had perpetrated, and of those who had not prevented, the destruction of the sacred statues. The tribunal of Hellebicus and Cæsarius, encompassed with armed soldiers, was erected in the midst of the Forum. The noblest, and most wealthy, of the citizens of Antioch appeared before them in chains; the examination was assisted by the use of torture, and their sentence was pronounced or suspended, according to the judgment of these extraordinary magistrates. The houses of the criminals were exposed to sale, their wives and children were suddenly reduced, from affluence and luxury, to the most abject distress; and a bloody execution was expected to conclude the horrors of the day, which the preacher of Antioch, the eloquent Chrysostom, has represented as a lively image of the last and universal judgment of the world. But the ministers of Theodosius performed, with reluctance, the cruel task which had been assigned them; they dropped a gentle tear over the calamities of the people; and they listened with reverence to the pressing solicitations of the monks and hermits, who descended in swarms from the mountains. Hellebicus and Cæsarius were persuaded to suspend the execution of their sentence; and it was agreed that the former should remain at Antioch, while the latter returned, with all possible speed, to Constantinople; and presumed once more to consult the will of his sovereign. The resentment of Theodosius had already subsided; the deputies of the people, both the bishop and the orator, had obtained a favorable audience; and the reproaches of the emperor were the complaints of injured friendship, rather than the stern menaces of pride and power. A free and general pardon was granted to the city and citizens of Antioch; the prison doors were thrown open; the senators, who despaired of their lives, recovered the possession of their houses and estates; and the capital of the East was restored to the enjoyment of her ancient dignity and splendor. Theodosius condescended to praise the senate of Constantinople, who had generously interceded for their distressed brethren: he rewarded the eloquence of Hilarius with the government of Palestine; and dismissed the bishop of Antioch with the warmest expressions of his respect and gratitude. A thousand new statues arose to the clemency of Theodosius; the applause of his subjects was ratified by the approbation of his own heart; and the emperor confessed, that, if the exercise of justice is the most important duty, the indulgence of mercy is the most exquisite pleasure, of a sovereign.
The lively impatience of the people of Antioch was never satisfied with their situation or with the character and actions of their successive rulers. The Arian followers of Theodosius mourned the loss of their churches, and as three rival bishops fought for control of Antioch, the ruling that determined their claims sparked discontent among the two unsuccessful groups. The demands of the Gothic war and the inevitable costs of concluding peace forced the emperor to increase public taxes, and the provinces of Asia, not having experienced the suffering, were even less willing to contribute to Europe’s relief. The favorable moment approached for the tenth year of his reign; a celebration more appreciated by the soldiers, who received a generous bonus, than by the citizens, whose voluntary contributions had long since turned into an extraordinary and oppressive burden. The tax decrees disrupted the peace and enjoyment of Antioch, and the magistrate's court was crowded with a desperate crowd, who, at first respectfully and then increasingly angrily, pleaded for the redress of their grievances. They gradually grew furious due to the arrogance of their proud rulers, who treated their complaints as criminal defiance; their satire turned into sharp and bitter insults, and the people's critiques eventually rose to challenge the sacred position of the emperor himself. Their anger, fueled by weak resistance, was unleashed on the images of the Imperial family, which had been erected as public veneration in the most visible parts of the city. The statues of Theodosius, his father, his wife Flaccilla, and his two sons, Arcadius and Honorius, were rudely toppled from their pedestals, smashed to pieces, or dragged contemptuously through the streets; the insults toward these representations of Imperial dignity clearly revealed the godless and treasonous desires of the populace. The uproar was quickly quelled by the arrival of a group of archers, and Antioch had time to reflect on the nature and consequences of its crime. In line with his duties, the governor of the province sent a detailed account of the entire incident, while the terrified citizens entrusted their confession of guilt and pledges of repentance to Flavian, their bishop, and to the eloquence of Senator Hilarius, a friend and likely disciple of Libanius, whose talents were not wasted on this tragic occasion. However, the two capitals, Antioch and Constantinople, were separated by 800 miles; and despite the Imperial posts' efficiency, the guilty city was harshly punished with a long and terrifying wait for news. Every rumor stirred the hopes and fears of the Antiochians, and they heard with dread that their ruler, incensed by the offense to his own statues, especially those of his beloved wife, had decided to destroy the city and to massacre its inhabitants without regard to age or gender; many fled to seek refuge in the mountains of Syria and the nearby desert out of fear. Finally, twenty-four days after the riot, generals Hellebicus and Cæsarius, the master of the offices, announced the emperor's orders and the judgement for Antioch. That proud city was stripped of its status and demoted to a village, losing its lands, privileges, and revenues, and placed under the humiliating authority of Laodicea. The baths, the Circus, and the theaters were closed, and to further cut off every source of abundance and pleasure, Theodosius issued orders to end the distribution of grain. His commissioners then started to investigate the culpability of individuals; those who had destroyed, and those who hadn’t intervened to prevent, the sacred statues from being destroyed. The court of Hellebicus and Cæsarius, surrounded by armed soldiers, was set up in the middle of the Forum. The most noble and wealthiest citizens of Antioch appeared before them in chains; the examination was aided by torture, and their verdicts were delivered or postponed depending on the judgment of these extraordinary magistrates. The homes of the guilty were put up for sale, their families suddenly reduced from wealth and luxury to the depths of poverty; and a bloody execution was anticipated to cap off the horrors of the day, which the preacher of Antioch, the eloquent Chrysostom, described vividly as a dark reflection of the final and universal reckoning. But the ministers of Theodosius reluctantly performed the brutal task assigned to them; they shed silent tears for the suffering of the people and listened gravely to the urgent pleas of the monks and hermits who descended from the mountains in droves. Hellebicus and Cæsarius were persuaded to delay carrying out their sentence; and it was agreed that the former would stay in Antioch while the latter hurried back to Constantinople to seek the will of his sovereign once more. Theodosius' anger had already cooled; the people's representatives, both the bishop and the orator, received a warm welcome; and the emperor's reproaches were more like the grievances of a hurt friend than the harsh threats of power. A complete and general pardon was granted to the city and its citizens; prison doors flew open; the senators, who feared for their lives, reclaimed their homes and properties; and the Eastern capital regained its former dignity and splendor. Theodosius graciously praised the senate of Constantinople for their generous plea on behalf of their distressed counterparts: he rewarded Hilarius's eloquence with the governorship of Palestine and dismissed the bishop of Antioch with gratified respect. Numerous new statues rose in honor of Theodosius’s mercy; the praise of his subjects was mirrored by the satisfaction in his own heart; and the emperor acknowledged that, while administering justice is the most vital duty, extending mercy is the sweetest pleasure of a sovereign.
The sedition of Thessalonica is ascribed to a more shameful cause, and was productive of much more dreadful consequences. That great city, the metropolis of all the Illyrian provinces, had been protected from the dangers of the Gothic war by strong fortifications and a numerous garrison. Botheric, the general of those troops, and, as it should seem from his name, a Barbarian, had among his slaves a beautiful boy, who excited the impure desires of one of the charioteers of the Circus. The insolent and brutal lover was thrown into prison by the order of Botheric; and he sternly rejected the importunate clamors of the multitude, who, on the day of the public games, lamented the absence of their favorite; and considered the skill of a charioteer as an object of more importance than his virtue. The resentment of the people was imbittered by some previous disputes; and, as the strength of the garrison had been drawn away for the service of the Italian war, the feeble remnant, whose numbers were reduced by desertion, could not save the unhappy general from their licentious fury. Botheric, and several of his principal officers, were inhumanly murdered; their mangled bodies were dragged about the streets; and the emperor, who then resided at Milan, was surprised by the intelligence of the audacious and wanton cruelty of the people of Thessalonica. The sentence of a dispassionate judge would have inflicted a severe punishment on the authors of the crime; and the merit of Botheric might contribute to exasperate the grief and indignation of his master. The fiery and choleric temper of Theodosius was impatient of the dilatory forms of a judicial inquiry; and he hastily resolved, that the blood of his lieutenant should be expiated by the blood of the guilty people. Yet his mind still fluctuated between the counsels of clemency and of revenge; the zeal of the bishops had almost extorted from the reluctant emperor the promise of a general pardon; his passion was again inflamed by the flattering suggestions of his minister Rufinus; and, after Theodosius had despatched the messengers of death, he attempted, when it was too late, to prevent the execution of his orders. The punishment of a Roman city was blindly committed to the undistinguishing sword of the Barbarians; and the hostile preparations were concerted with the dark and perfidious artifice of an illegal conspiracy. The people of Thessalonica were treacherously invited, in the name of their sovereign, to the games of the Circus; and such was their insatiate avidity for those amusements, that every consideration of fear, or suspicion, was disregarded by the numerous spectators. As soon as the assembly was complete, the soldiers, who had secretly been posted round the Circus, received the signal, not of the races, but of a general massacre. The promiscuous carnage continued three hours, without discrimination of strangers or natives, of age or sex, of innocence or guilt; the most moderate accounts state the number of the slain at seven thousand; and it is affirmed by some writers that more than fifteen thousand victims were sacrificed to the names of Botheric. A foreign merchant, who had probably no concern in his murder, offered his own life, and all his wealth, to supply the place of one of his two sons; but, while the father hesitated with equal tenderness, while he was doubtful to choose, and unwilling to condemn, the soldiers determined his suspense, by plunging their daggers at the same moment into the breasts of the defenceless youths. The apology of the assassins, that they were obliged to produce the prescribed number of heads, serves only to increase, by an appearance of order and design, the horrors of the massacre, which was executed by the commands of Theodosius. The guilt of the emperor is aggravated by his long and frequent residence at Thessalonica. The situation of the unfortunate city, the aspect of the streets and buildings, the dress and faces of the inhabitants, were familiar, and even present, to his imagination; and Theodosius possessed a quick and lively sense of the existence of the people whom he destroyed.
The unrest in Thessalonica was caused by a much more shameful issue and led to even more dreadful consequences. That great city, the capital of all the Illyrian provinces, had been shielded from the dangers of the Gothic war by strong walls and a large garrison. Botheric, the general of those troops, and likely a Barbarian by his name, had a beautiful boy among his slaves who stirred the inappropriate desires of one of the Circus charioteers. The arrogant and brutal lover was jailed by Botheric’s orders, and he firmly dismissed the constant cries of the crowd, who mourned the absence of their favorite on the day of the public games and valued the skills of a charioteer over his virtue. The people's anger was intensified by prior disputes, and since part of the garrison had been summoned for the Italian war, the weakened remaining forces, thinned by desertion, could not protect the unfortunate general from their unruly rage. Botheric and several of his top officers were brutally murdered; their mangled bodies were dragged through the streets, shocking the emperor, who was then in Milan, with news of the bold and savage cruelty of the Thessalonicans. A rational judge would have issued a harsh punishment for the crime’s perpetrators, and Botheric's merit might have fueled his master's grief and anger. Theodosius, known for his fiery and temperamental nature, was impatient with the slow processes of a judicial review, and quickly decided that the blood of his lieutenant should be avenged with the blood of the guilty people. Yet, he still wavered between mercy and vengeance; the bishops' fervor almost compelled the reluctant emperor to promise a general pardon, but his anger was reignited by the flattering advice of his minister Rufinus. After sending out the death orders, Theodosius tried, too late, to stop the execution of his commands. The punishment of a Roman city was recklessly left to the indiscriminate swords of the Barbarians; and hostile preparations were made through a dark and treacherous conspiracy. The people of Thessalonica were deceitfully invited, in their sovereign's name, to the Circus games; their overwhelming eagerness for entertainment made them ignore any sense of fear or suspicion. When the crowd gathered, soldiers secretly positioned around the Circus received a signal, not for the races, but for a mass slaughter. The random killing lasted three hours, showing no mercy to anyone—strangers or locals, young or old, innocent or guilty; the most conservative estimates report seven thousand dead, while some writers claim over fifteen thousand victims were taken for the name of Botheric. A foreign merchant, seemingly uninvolved in the murder, offered his life and all his wealth to save one of his two sons; yet, as he hesitated, torn between love and dread, the soldiers ended his indecision by simultaneously stabbing both defenseless youths. The assassins’ excuse that they were required to present a certain number of heads only added a twisted semblance of order to the horrors of the massacre executed under Theodosius’s orders. The emperor's guilt is compounded by his long and frequent stays in Thessalonica. The unfortunate city's layout, the look of its streets and buildings, the clothing and faces of its people were all familiar to him; Theodosius was acutely aware of the lives he was destroying.
The respectful attachment of the emperor for the orthodox clergy, had disposed him to love and admire the character of Ambrose; who united all the episcopal virtues in the most eminent degree. The friends and ministers of Theodosius imitated the example of their sovereign; and he observed, with more surprise than displeasure, that all his secret counsels were immediately communicated to the archbishop; who acted from the laudable persuasion, that every measure of civil government may have some connection with the glory of God, and the interest of the true religion. The monks and populace of Callinicum, an obscure town on the frontier of Persia, excited by their own fanaticism, and by that of their bishop, had tumultuously burnt a conventicle of the Valentinians, and a synagogue of the Jews. The seditious prelate was condemned, by the magistrate of the province, either to rebuild the synagogue, or to repay the damage; and this moderate sentence was confirmed by the emperor. But it was not confirmed by the archbishop of Milan. He dictated an epistle of censure and reproach, more suitable, perhaps, if the emperor had received the mark of circumcision, and renounced the faith of his baptism. Ambrose considers the toleration of the Jewish, as the persecution of the Christian, religion; boldly declares that he himself, and every true believer, would eagerly dispute with the bishop of Callinicum the merit of the deed, and the crown of martyrdom; and laments, in the most pathetic terms, that the execution of the sentence would be fatal to the fame and salvation of Theodosius. As this private admonition did not produce an immediate effect, the archbishop, from his pulpit, publicly addressed the emperor on his throne; nor would he consent to offer the oblation of the altar, till he had obtained from Theodosius a solemn and positive declaration, which secured the impunity of the bishop and monks of Callinicum. The recantation of Theodosius was sincere; and, during the term of his residence at Milan, his affection for Ambrose was continually increased by the habits of pious and familiar conversation.
The emperor's deep respect for the orthodox clergy led him to admire Ambrose's character, who embodied all the bishop's virtues to a remarkable extent. Theodosius's friends and officials followed their leader’s example, and he observed, more with surprise than anger, that all his private plans were quickly relayed to the archbishop. The archbishop believed strongly that every aspect of civil governance could relate to God's glory and the interests of true religion. In Callinicum, a small town on the Persian border, the local monks and townspeople, fueled by their own fanaticism and that of their bishop, had violently burned down a gathering place of the Valentinians and a synagogue of the Jews. The local magistrate ordered the bishop either to rebuild the synagogue or pay for the damage, and this reasonable ruling was upheld by the emperor. However, it did not receive the same endorsement from Milan's archbishop. He wrote a letter of criticism that seemed more appropriate if the emperor had been circumcised and renounced his baptismal faith. Ambrose viewed the tolerance of Jews as a direct attack on the Christian faith, boldly stating that he and any true believer would willingly debate the bishop of Callinicum about the worth of the act and the crown of martyrdom. He mourned in deeply emotional terms that enforcing the ruling would harm Theodosius's reputation and salvation. When this private warning failed to yield immediate results, the archbishop openly spoke to the emperor from his pulpit; he refused to perform the altar offering until Theodosius issued a clear and definite declaration that ensured the safety of the bishop and monks from Callinicum. Theodosius's change of heart was genuine; and during his time in Milan, his bond with Ambrose grew stronger through their shared pious and friendly discussions.
When Ambrose was informed of the massacre of Thessalonica, his mind was filled with horror and anguish. He retired into the country to indulge his grief, and to avoid the presence of Theodosius. But as the archbishop was satisfied that a timid silence would render him the accomplice of his guilt, he represented, in a private letter, the enormity of the crime; which could only be effaced by the tears of penitence. The episcopal vigor of Ambrose was tempered by prudence; and he contented himself with signifying an indirect sort of excommunication, by the assurance, that he had been warned in a vision not to offer the oblation in the name, or in the presence, of Theodosius; and by the advice, that he would confine himself to the use of prayer, without presuming to approach the altar of Christ, or to receive the holy eucharist with those hands that were still polluted with the blood of an innocent people. The emperor was deeply affected by his own reproaches, and by those of his spiritual father; and after he had bewailed the mischievous and irreparable consequences of his rash fury, he proceeded, in the accustomed manner, to perform his devotions in the great church of Milan. He was stopped in the porch by the archbishop; who, in the tone and language of an ambassador of Heaven, declared to his sovereign, that private contrition was not sufficient to atone for a public fault, or to appease the justice of the offended Deity. Theodosius humbly represented, that if he had contracted the guilt of homicide, David, the man after God's own heart, had been guilty, not only of murder, but of adultery. "You have imitated David in his crime, imitate then his repentance," was the reply of the undaunted Ambrose. The rigorous conditions of peace and pardon were accepted; and the public penance of the emperor Theodosius has been recorded as one of the most honorable events in the annals of the church. According to the mildest rules of ecclesiastical discipline, which were established in the fourth century, the crime of homicide was expiated by the penitence of twenty years: and as it was impossible, in the period of human life, to purge the accumulated guilt of the massacre of Thessalonica, the murderer should have been excluded from the holy communion till the hour of his death. But the archbishop, consulting the maxims of religious policy, granted some indulgence to the rank of his illustrious penitent, who humbled in the dust the pride of the diadem; and the public edification might be admitted as a weighty reason to abridge the duration of his punishment. It was sufficient, that the emperor of the Romans, stripped of the ensigns of royalty, should appear in a mournful and suppliant posture; and that, in the midst of the church of Milan, he should humbly solicit, with sighs and tears, the pardon of his sins. In this spiritual cure, Ambrose employed the various methods of mildness and severity. After a delay of about eight months, Theodosius was restored to the communion of the faithful; and the edict which interposes a salutary interval of thirty days between the sentence and the execution, may be accepted as the worthy fruits of his repentance. Posterity has applauded the virtuous firmness of the archbishop; and the example of Theodosius may prove the beneficial influence of those principles, which could force a monarch, exalted above the apprehension of human punishment, to respect the laws, and ministers, of an invisible Judge. "The prince," says Montesquieu, "who is actuated by the hopes and fears of religion, may be compared to a lion, docile only to the voice, and tractable to the hand, of his keeper." The motions of the royal animal will therefore depend on the inclination, and interest, of the man who has acquired such dangerous authority over him; and the priest, who holds in his hands the conscience of a king, may inflame, or moderate, his sanguinary passions. The cause of humanity, and that of persecution, have been asserted, by the same Ambrose, with equal energy, and with equal success.
When Ambrose heard about the massacre in Thessalonica, he was filled with horror and grief. He withdrew to the countryside to mourn and to avoid Theodosius. However, the archbishop believed that staying silent would make him complicit in the emperor's wrongdoing, so he wrote a private letter detailing the severity of the crime, which could only be washed away by tears of repentance. Though Ambrose was strong in his position, he showed prudence and communicated an indirect form of excommunication. He claimed he had received a vision warning him not to offer the holy sacrifice in Theodosius's name or presence, advising him to focus on prayer and to refrain from approaching Christ's altar or receiving the Eucharist with hands still stained by the blood of innocent people. The emperor felt deeply affected by his own guilt and by his spiritual father's words. After lamenting the harmful and irreparable outcomes of his reckless actions, he went to pray at the great church in Milan. He was stopped at the entrance by the archbishop, who, in the manner of a heavenly messenger, told him that private remorse was not enough to atone for a public sin or to satisfy the justice of the offended God. Theodosius humbly replied that if he was guilty of murder, then King David, a man after God's own heart, not only committed murder but also adultery. "You have followed David in his sin, now follow him in his repentance," was Ambrose's fearless reply. The tough terms for peace and forgiveness were agreed upon, and the public penance of Emperor Theodosius has been recorded as one of the most honorable acts in church history. According to the gentlest rules of church discipline from the fourth century, homicide required twenty years of penance; since it was impossible to cleanse the overwhelming guilt from the Thessalonica massacre in one lifetime, the murderer would typically be barred from holy communion until death. However, the archbishop, considering the principles of religious strategy, offered some leniency due to the rank of his distinguished penitent, who humbled himself despite his royal status; the public benefit of his repentance was also a valid reason to lessen the length of his punishment. It sufficed that the emperor of the Romans, stripped of his royal insignia, should appear mournful and humble, seeking forgiveness for his sins with sighs and tears in the midst of the church in Milan. In this spiritual healing process, Ambrose used both gentle and firm approaches. After about eight months, Theodosius was restored to communion with the faithful, and the decree establishing a thirty-day interval between sentencing and execution reflected the genuine fruits of his repentance. Future generations have praised the noble resolve of the archbishop, and the experience of Theodosius highlights the positive impact of principles that could compel a monarch, who otherwise might feel above human consequence, to respect the laws and messengers of a higher authority. "The prince," Montesquieu suggests, "who is influenced by the hopes and fears of religion, is like a lion, gentle only to the voice and touch of his keeper." Thus, the behavior of this royal creature relies on the inclinations and interests of the individual who wields such precarious power over him; the priest, who holds a king's conscience, can either inflame or temper his violent passions. Ambrose has tirelessly defended both humanitarian causes and the fight against persecution with equal vigor and success.
Chapter XXVII: Civil Wars, Reign Of Theodosius.—Part V.
After the defeat and death of the tyrant of Gaul, the Roman world was in the possession of Theodosius. He derived from the choice of Gratian his honorable title to the provinces of the East: he had acquired the West by the right of conquest; and the three years which he spent in Italy were usefully employed to restore the authority of the laws, and to correct the abuses which had prevailed with impunity under the usurpation of Maximus, and the minority of Valentinian. The name of Valentinian was regularly inserted in the public acts: but the tender age, and doubtful faith, of the son of Justina, appeared to require the prudent care of an orthodox guardian; and his specious ambition might have excluded the unfortunate youth, without a struggle, and almost without a murmur, from the administration, and even from the inheritance, of the empire. If Theodosius had consulted the rigid maxims of interest and policy, his conduct would have been justified by his friends; but the generosity of his behavior on this memorable occasion has extorted the applause of his most inveterate enemies. He seated Valentinian on the throne of Milan; and, without stipulating any present or future advantages, restored him to the absolute dominion of all the provinces, from which he had been driven by the arms of Maximus. To the restitution of his ample patrimony, Theodosius added the free and generous gift of the countries beyond the Alps, which his successful valor had recovered from the assassin of Gratian. Satisfied with the glory which he had acquired, by revenging the death of his benefactor, and delivering the West from the yoke of tyranny, the emperor returned from Milan to Constantinople; and, in the peaceful possession of the East, insensibly relapsed into his former habits of luxury and indolence. Theodosius discharged his obligation to the brother, he indulged his conjugal tenderness to the sister, of Valentinian; and posterity, which admires the pure and singular glory of his elevation, must applaud his unrivalled generosity in the use of victory.
After the defeat and death of the tyrant of Gaul, Theodosius gained control over the Roman world. He earned his honorable title to the provinces in the East from Gratian's choice and took over the West through conquest. The three years he spent in Italy were well spent restoring the authority of the laws and fixing the abuses that had gone unpunished during Maximus's usurpation and Valentinian's minority. Valentinian's name was regularly included in public acts, but the young age and uncertain loyalty of Justina's son seemed to require the wise oversight of a loyal guardian. His tempting ambition could have easily pushed the unfortunate youth aside, almost without resistance, from the administration and even from inheriting the empire. If Theodosius had followed strict self-interest and political strategy, his actions would have been supported by his allies, but the generosity he showed during this significant moment won the praise of even his fiercest enemies. He placed Valentinian on the throne of Milan and, without asking for any immediate or future benefits, restored him to complete control over all the provinces from which he’d been expelled by Maximus's forces. In addition to restoring his substantial inheritance, Theodosius generously gave him the lands beyond the Alps, which his successful bravery had reclaimed from Gratian's assassin. Content with the honor he gained by avenging his benefactor's death and freeing the West from tyranny, the emperor returned from Milan to Constantinople. In the peaceful management of the East, he gradually slipped back into his previous habits of luxury and laziness. Theodosius fulfilled his responsibilities to Valentinian's brother and showed affection to his sister. Future generations, who admire the pure and unique honor of his rise to power, will recognize his unmatched generosity in utilizing his victory.
The empress Justina did not long survive her return to Italy; and, though she beheld the triumph of Theodosius, she was not allowed to influence the government of her son. The pernicious attachment to the Arian sect, which Valentinian had imbibed from her example and instructions, was soon erased by the lessons of a more orthodox education. His growing zeal for the faith of Nice, and his filial reverence for the character and authority of Ambrose, disposed the Catholics to entertain the most favorable opinion of the virtues of the young emperor of the West. They applauded his chastity and temperance, his contempt of pleasure, his application to business, and his tender affection for his two sisters; which could not, however, seduce his impartial equity to pronounce an unjust sentence against the meanest of his subjects. But this amiable youth, before he had accomplished the twentieth year of his age, was oppressed by domestic treason; and the empire was again involved in the horrors of a civil war. Arbogastes, a gallant soldier of the nation of the Franks, held the second rank in the service of Gratian. On the death of his master he joined the standard of Theodosius; contributed, by his valor and military conduct, to the destruction of the tyrant; and was appointed, after the victory, master-general of the armies of Gaul. His real merit, and apparent fidelity, had gained the confidence both of the prince and people; his boundless liberality corrupted the allegiance of the troops; and, whilst he was universally esteemed as the pillar of the state, the bold and crafty Barbarian was secretly determined either to rule, or to ruin, the empire of the West. The important commands of the army were distributed among the Franks; the creatures of Arbogastes were promoted to all the honors and offices of the civil government; the progress of the conspiracy removed every faithful servant from the presence of Valentinian; and the emperor, without power and without intelligence, insensibly sunk into the precarious and dependent condition of a captive. The indignation which he expressed, though it might arise only from the rash and impatient temper of youth, may be candidly ascribed to the generous spirit of a prince, who felt that he was not unworthy to reign. He secretly invited the archbishop of Milan to undertake the office of a mediator; as the pledge of his sincerity, and the guardian of his safety. He contrived to apprise the emperor of the East of his helpless situation, and he declared, that, unless Theodosius could speedily march to his assistance, he must attempt to escape from the palace, or rather prison, of Vienna in Gaul, where he had imprudently fixed his residence in the midst of the hostile faction. But the hopes of relief were distant, and doubtful: and, as every day furnished some new provocation, the emperor, without strength or counsel, too hastily resolved to risk an immediate contest with his powerful general. He received Arbogastes on the throne; and, as the count approached with some appearance of respect, delivered to him a paper, which dismissed him from all his employments. "My authority," replied Arbogastes, with insulting coolness, "does not depend on the smile or the frown of a monarch;" and he contemptuously threw the paper on the ground. The indignant monarch snatched at the sword of one of the guards, which he struggled to draw from its scabbard; and it was not without some degree of violence that he was prevented from using the deadly weapon against his enemy, or against himself. A few days after this extraordinary quarrel, in which he had exposed his resentment and his weakness, the unfortunate Valentinian was found strangled in his apartment; and some pains were employed to disguise the manifest guilt of Arbogastes, and to persuade the world, that the death of the young emperor had been the voluntary effect of his own despair. His body was conducted with decent pomp to the sepulchre of Milan; and the archbishop pronounced a funeral oration to commemorate his virtues and his misfortunes. On this occasion the humanity of Ambrose tempted him to make a singular breach in his theological system; and to comfort the weeping sisters of Valentinian, by the firm assurance, that their pious brother, though he had not received the sacrament of baptism, was introduced, without difficulty, into the mansions of eternal bliss.
The empress Justina didn’t live long after returning to Italy; and although she witnessed Theodosius's triumph, she wasn’t able to influence the government of her son. The harmful loyalty to the Arian sect, which Valentinian had adopted from her example and teachings, was quickly replaced by a more orthodox education. His growing passion for the faith of Nice, along with his deep respect for Ambrose's character and authority, led Catholics to have a very positive view of the young emperor of the West. They praised his chastity and self-control, his disregard for pleasure, his dedication to work, and his loving care for his two sisters; however, this didn’t sway his fairness to make unjust decisions against even the least of his subjects. But this kind young man, before he turned twenty, was brought down by family betrayal; and the empire was once again plunged into the horrors of civil war. Arbogastes, a brave soldier from the Frankish nation, held the second-highest position in Gratian's service. After his master’s death, he joined Theodosius's forces; his bravery and military skill helped bring down the tyrant, and after the victory, he was appointed master-general of the armies in Gaul. His real worth and visible loyalty earned him the trust of both the prince and the people; his immense generosity corrupted the loyalty of the troops; and while he was widely regarded as the backbone of the state, the bold and shrewd Barbarian secretly plotted to either dominate or destroy the Western empire. Key military positions were given to the Franks; Arbogastes's supporters were promoted to high honors and government roles; the conspiracy pushed aside every loyal servant from Valentinian's presence; and the emperor, stripped of power and insight, gradually sank into the vulnerable and reliant position of a captive. The anger he displayed, though it might have stemmed from the impulsive and impatient nature of youth, can genuinely reflect the noble spirit of a prince who felt he deserved to rule. He quietly invited the archbishop of Milan to serve as a mediator; he hoped this would demonstrate his sincerity and protect his safety. He managed to inform the emperor of the East about his desperate situation, stating that unless Theodosius could promptly come to his aid, he would have to try to escape from the palace—more like a prison—in Vienna, where he had foolishly settled amid the hostile faction. However, the chances for help seemed far and uncertain; and as each day brought new challenges, the emperor, lacking strength or advice, rashly decided to confront his powerful general. He welcomed Arbogastes on the throne; and as the count approached him with a show of respect, he handed him a paper that stripped him of all his duties. "My authority," Arbogastes replied with dismissive arrogance, "does not rely on a monarch's approval or disapproval," and he contemptuously tossed the paper to the ground. The furious emperor lunged for the sword of a guard, struggling to draw it from its sheath; it took some force to stop him from using the lethal weapon against his enemy or even himself. A few days after this extraordinary confrontation, where he revealed his frustration and vulnerability, the unfortunate Valentinian was found strangled in his room; efforts were made to disguise Arbogastes's obvious guilt and convince the public that the young emperor's death was a result of his own despair. His body was given a respectful send-off to the tomb in Milan; and the archbishop delivered a eulogy to honor his virtues and misfortunes. On this occasion, Ambrose's kindness led him to make an unusual break from his theological beliefs, as he comforted Valentinian's grieving sisters with the firm assurance that their devoted brother, even without having received baptism, was welcomed into the eternal bliss easily.
The prudence of Arbogastes had prepared the success of his ambitious designs: and the provincials, in whose breast every sentiment of patriotism or loyalty was extinguished, expected, with tame resignation, the unknown master, whom the choice of a Frank might place on the Imperial throne. But some remains of pride and prejudice still opposed the elevation of Arbogastes himself; and the judicious Barbarian thought it more advisable to reign under the name of some dependent Roman. He bestowed the purple on the rhetorician Eugenius; whom he had already raised from the place of his domestic secretary to the rank of master of the offices. In the course, both of his private and public service, the count had always approved the attachment and abilities of Eugenius; his learning and eloquence, supported by the gravity of his manners, recommended him to the esteem of the people; and the reluctance with which he seemed to ascend the throne, may inspire a favorable prejudice of his virtue and moderation. The ambassadors of the new emperor were immediately despatched to the court of Theodosius, to communicate, with affected grief, the unfortunate accident of the death of Valentinian; and, without mentioning the name of Arbogastes, to request, that the monarch of the East would embrace, as his lawful colleague, the respectable citizen, who had obtained the unanimous suffrage of the armies and provinces of the West. Theodosius was justly provoked, that the perfidy of a Barbarian, should have destroyed, in a moment, the labors, and the fruit, of his former victory; and he was excited by the tears of his beloved wife, to revenge the fate of her unhappy brother, and once more to assert by arms the violated majesty of the throne. But as the second conquest of the West was a task of difficulty and danger, he dismissed, with splendid presents, and an ambiguous answer, the ambassadors of Eugenius; and almost two years were consumed in the preparations of the civil war. Before he formed any decisive resolution, the pious emperor was anxious to discover the will of Heaven; and as the progress of Christianity had silenced the oracles of Delphi and Dodona, he consulted an Egyptian monk, who possessed, in the opinion of the age, the gift of miracles, and the knowledge of futurity. Eutropius, one of the favorite eunuchs of the palace of Constantinople, embarked for Alexandria, from whence he sailed up the Nile, as far as the city of Lycopolis, or of Wolves, in the remote province of Thebais. In the neighborhood of that city, and on the summit of a lofty mountain, the holy John had constructed, with his own hands, an humble cell, in which he had dwelt above fifty years, without opening his door, without seeing the face of a woman, and without tasting any food that had been prepared by fire, or any human art. Five days of the week he spent in prayer and meditation; but on Saturdays and Sundays he regularly opened a small window, and gave audience to the crowd of suppliants who successively flowed from every part of the Christian world. The eunuch of Theodosius approached the window with respectful steps, proposed his questions concerning the event of the civil war, and soon returned with a favorable oracle, which animated the courage of the emperor by the assurance of a bloody, but infallible victory. The accomplishment of the prediction was forwarded by all the means that human prudence could supply. The industry of the two master-generals, Stilicho and Timasius, was directed to recruit the numbers, and to revive the discipline of the Roman legions. The formidable troops of Barbarians marched under the ensigns of their national chieftains. The Iberian, the Arab, and the Goth, who gazed on each other with mutual astonishment, were enlisted in the service of the same prince; and the renowned Alaric acquired, in the school of Theodosius, the knowledge of the art of war, which he afterwards so fatally exerted for the destruction of Rome.
The caution of Arbogastes set the stage for his ambitious plans, and the locals, who had lost all sense of patriotism or loyalty, awaited, with a resigned attitude, the unknown ruler that a Frank might place on the Imperial throne. However, some remnants of pride and bias still stood in the way of Arbogastes himself becoming emperor; he thought it would be wiser to rule under the name of a subordinate Roman. He appointed the rhetorician Eugenius, whom he had already promoted from his position as domestic secretary to the role of master of the offices. Throughout both his private and public service, the count had always appreciated Eugenius's loyalty and skills; his knowledge and eloquence, along with his dignified demeanor, earned him the respect of the people. The hesitance with which Eugenius seemed to accept the throne might create a favorable impression of his virtue and moderation. The messengers of the new emperor were quickly sent to Theodosius's court to report, with feigned sorrow, the unfortunate news of Valentinian's death, and to request, without mentioning Arbogastes's name, that the Eastern monarch recognize, as his rightful colleague, the respected citizen who had received the unanimous approval of the Western armies and provinces. Theodosius was rightly angered that the treachery of a Barbarian had wiped out, in an instant, the efforts and rewards of his earlier victory; spurred on by the tears of his beloved wife, he felt compelled to avenge her unfortunate brother and to restore the dignity of the throne through military action. However, since the second conquest of the West would be challenging and perilous, he sent away Eugenius's envoys with generous gifts and an ambiguous response, while nearly two years were spent preparing for civil war. Before making any final decision, the devout emperor wanted to discern the will of Heaven; and since the rise of Christianity had silenced the oracles of Delphi and Dodona, he consulted an Egyptian monk, who was believed, at the time, to have miraculous abilities and knowledge of the future. Eutropius, one of the favored eunuchs in Constantinople’s palace, traveled to Alexandria, then sailed up the Nile to the city of Lycopolis, or the City of Wolves, in the distant region of Thebais. Near that city, atop a high mountain, the holy John had built, with his own hands, a simple cell, in which he had lived for over fifty years, without opening his door, seeing a woman’s face, or eating any food that had been cooked or prepared by human hands. He spent five days a week in prayer and reflection, but on Saturdays and Sundays, he would open a small window to attend to the crowds of petitioners arriving from all over the Christian world. The eunuch of Theodosius approached the window respectfully, posed his inquiries about the civil war, and soon returned with an encouraging prophecy, which bolstered the emperor's courage with the promise of a bloody but certain victory. The realization of the prophecy was advanced through every means that human wisdom could provide. The efforts of the two master-generals, Stilicho and Timasius, were focused on increasing the numbers and restoring the discipline of the Roman legions. The terrifying Barbarian forces marched under the banners of their national leaders. The Iberian, the Arab, and the Goth, who looked at each other in mutual surprise, were enlisted under a single ruler; and the renowned Alaric learned the art of warfare at Theodosius's side, which he later used with devastating effect against Rome.
The emperor of the West, or, to speak more properly, his general Arbogastes, was instructed by the misconduct and misfortune of Maximus, how dangerous it might prove to extend the line of defence against a skilful antagonist, who was free to press, or to suspend, to contract, or to multiply, his various methods of attack. Arbogastes fixed his station on the confines of Italy; the troops of Theodosius were permitted to occupy, without resistance, the provinces of Pannonia, as far as the foot of the Julian Alps; and even the passes of the mountains were negligently, or perhaps artfully, abandoned to the bold invader. He descended from the hills, and beheld, with some astonishment, the formidable camp of the Gauls and Germans, that covered with arms and tents the open country which extends to the walls of Aquileia, and the banks of the Frigidus, or Cold River. This narrow theatre of the war, circumscribed by the Alps and the Adriatic, did not allow much room for the operations of military skill; the spirit of Arbogastes would have disdained a pardon; his guilt extinguished the hope of a negotiation; and Theodosius was impatient to satisfy his glory and revenge, by the chastisement of the assassins of Valentinian. Without weighing the natural and artificial obstacles that opposed his efforts, the emperor of the East immediately attacked the fortifications of his rivals, assigned the post of honorable danger to the Goths, and cherished a secret wish, that the bloody conflict might diminish the pride and numbers of the conquerors. Ten thousand of those auxiliaries, and Bacurius, general of the Iberians, died bravely on the field of battle. But the victory was not purchased by their blood; the Gauls maintained their advantage; and the approach of night protected the disorderly flight, or retreat, of the troops of Theodosius. The emperor retired to the adjacent hills; where he passed a disconsolate night, without sleep, without provisions, and without hopes; except that strong assurance, which, under the most desperate circumstances, the independent mind may derive from the contempt of fortune and of life. The triumph of Eugenius was celebrated by the insolent and dissolute joy of his camp; whilst the active and vigilant Arbogastes secretly detached a considerable body of troops to occupy the passes of the mountains, and to encompass the rear of the Eastern army. The dawn of day discovered to the eyes of Theodosius the extent and the extremity of his danger; but his apprehensions were soon dispelled, by a friendly message from the leaders of those troops who expressed their inclination to desert the standard of the tyrant. The honorable and lucrative rewards, which they stipulated as the price of their perfidy, were granted without hesitation; and as ink and paper could not easily be procured, the emperor subscribed, on his own tablets, the ratification of the treaty. The spirit of his soldiers was revived by this seasonable reenforcement; and they again marched, with confidence, to surprise the camp of a tyrant, whose principal officers appeared to distrust, either the justice or the success of his arms. In the heat of the battle, a violent tempest, such as is often felt among the Alps, suddenly arose from the East. The army of Theodosius was sheltered by their position from the impetuosity of the wind, which blew a cloud of dust in the faces of the enemy, disordered their ranks, wrested their weapons from their hands, and diverted, or repelled, their ineffectual javelins. This accidental advantage was skilfully improved, the violence of the storm was magnified by the superstitious terrors of the Gauls; and they yielded without shame to the invisible powers of heaven, who seemed to militate on the side of the pious emperor. His victory was decisive; and the deaths of his two rivals were distinguished only by the difference of their characters. The rhetorician Eugenius, who had almost acquired the dominion of the world, was reduced to implore the mercy of the conqueror; and the unrelenting soldiers separated his head from his body as he lay prostrate at the feet of Theodosius. Arbogastes, after the loss of a battle, in which he had discharged the duties of a soldier and a general, wandered several days among the mountains. But when he was convinced that his cause was desperate, and his escape impracticable, the intrepid Barbarian imitated the example of the ancient Romans, and turned his sword against his own breast. The fate of the empire was determined in a narrow corner of Italy; and the legitimate successor of the house of Valentinian embraced the archbishop of Milan, and graciously received the submission of the provinces of the West. Those provinces were involved in the guilt of rebellion; while the inflexible courage of Ambrose alone had resisted the claims of successful usurpation. With a manly freedom, which might have been fatal to any other subject, the archbishop rejected the gifts of Eugenius, declined his correspondence, and withdrew himself from Milan, to avoid the odious presence of a tyrant, whose downfall he predicted in discreet and ambiguous language. The merit of Ambrose was applauded by the conqueror, who secured the attachment of the people by his alliance with the church; and the clemency of Theodosius is ascribed to the humane intercession of the archbishop of Milan.
The emperor of the West, or more accurately, his general Arbogastes, learned from Maximus's mistakes and misfortunes how risky it could be to stretch the defensive line against a skilled opponent who could change his methods of attack at will. Arbogastes set up his position near the borders of Italy; Theodosius’s troops were allowed to take control of the provinces of Pannonia without any resistance, reaching up to the Julian Alps, and even the mountain passes were carelessly, or perhaps deliberately, left open to the bold invader. He came down from the hills and was somewhat astonished to see the impressive camp of the Gauls and Germans, which filled the open land up to the walls of Aquileia and the banks of the Cold River. This narrow battlefield, bordered by the Alps and the Adriatic, left little room for military strategy; Arbogastes would have dismissed any chance of a pardon; his guilt erased any hope of negotiation, and Theodosius was eager to fulfill his ambitions for glory and revenge by punishing the assassins of Valentinian. Without considering the natural and man-made obstacles in his way, the emperor of the East quickly attacked the rivals' fortifications, assigning the role of honorable danger to the Goths, while secretly hoping that the bloody conflict would weaken the pride and numbers of the conquerors. Ten thousand of those auxiliary troops and Bacurius, the general of the Iberians, fought bravely and died on the battlefield. But their blood did not buy the victory; the Gauls held their ground, and the approaching night allowed for a chaotic retreat of Theodosius’s forces. The emperor withdrew to the nearby hills, where he spent a sleepless night, without food and without hope, except for a strong inner confidence that, even in the direst circumstances, the independent mind can find strength in dismissing fortune and life. Eugenius's triumph was celebrated with arrogant and reckless joy in his camp, while the alert and strategic Arbogastes secretly sent a significant number of troops to occupy the mountain passes and encircle the Eastern army. At dawn, Theodosius saw the full extent of his danger; however, his fears were soon calmed by a friendly message from the leaders of those troops who expressed their willingness to abandon the tyrant. The honorable and profitable rewards they asked for in exchange for their betrayal were granted without hesitation; and since ink and paper were hard to come by, the emperor signed the treaty on his own tablets. The spirits of his soldiers were lifted by this timely reinforcement, and they marched confidently to launch a surprise attack on the camp of a tyrant, whose top commanders were starting to doubt either the justice or success of his forces. In the heat of the battle, a fierce storm, typical among the Alps, suddenly erupted from the East. Theodosius's army was sheltered by their position from the force of the wind, which blew a cloud of dust into the enemy’s faces, disrupted their ranks, wrested weapons from their hands, and deflected their ineffective javelins. This unexpected advantage was skillfully exploited; the power of the storm was exaggerated by the superstitious fears of the Gauls, and they shamefully surrendered to the unseen forces of heaven, which seemed to support the devout emperor. His victory was decisive; the deaths of his two rivals echoed only the differences in their characters. The orator Eugenius, who had almost gained control of the world, was reduced to begging for the conqueror's mercy; and the unyielding soldiers severed his head from his body while he lay defeated at Theodosius’s feet. After losing a battle in which he had tried his best as both a soldier and a general, Arbogastes wandered among the mountains for several days. But when he realized his cause was hopeless and escape was impossible, the fearless Barbarian followed the lead of ancient Romans and turned his sword against himself. The fate of the empire was decided in a small corner of Italy, and the rightful heir of the house of Valentinian embraced the archbishop of Milan and graciously accepted the submission of the Western provinces. Those provinces were embroiled in the guilt of rebellion; only the steadfast courage of Ambrose had resisted the claims of successful usurpation. With a manly independence that could have endangered any other subject, the archbishop turned down Eugenius’s gifts, rejected his correspondence, and left Milan to avoid the unpleasant presence of a tyrant, whose downfall he discreetly predicted with ambiguous words. The conqueror praised Ambrose’s merit, securing the loyalty of the people through his alliance with the church, and Theodosius's clemency is attributed to the compassionate intercession of the archbishop of Milan.
After the defeat of Eugenius, the merit, as well as the authority, of Theodosius was cheerfully acknowledged by all the inhabitants of the Roman world. The experience of his past conduct encouraged the most pleasing expectations of his future reign; and the age of the emperor, which did not exceed fifty years, seemed to extend the prospect of the public felicity. His death, only four months after his victory, was considered by the people as an unforeseen and fatal event, which destroyed, in a moment, the hopes of the rising generation. But the indulgence of ease and luxury had secretly nourished the principles of disease. The strength of Theodosius was unable to support the sudden and violent transition from the palace to the camp; and the increasing symptoms of a dropsy announced the speedy dissolution of the emperor. The opinion, and perhaps the interest, of the public had confirmed the division of the Eastern and Western empires; and the two royal youths, Arcadius and Honorius, who had already obtained, from the tenderness of their father, the title of Augustus, were destined to fill the thrones of Constantinople and of Rome. Those princes were not permitted to share the danger and glory of the civil war; but as soon as Theodosius had triumphed over his unworthy rivals, he called his younger son, Honorius, to enjoy the fruits of the victory, and to receive the sceptre of the West from the hands of his dying father. The arrival of Honorius at Milan was welcomed by a splendid exhibition of the games of the Circus; and the emperor, though he was oppressed by the weight of his disorder, contributed by his presence to the public joy. But the remains of his strength were exhausted by the painful effort which he made to assist at the spectacles of the morning. Honorius supplied, during the rest of the day, the place of his father; and the great Theodosius expired in the ensuing night. Notwithstanding the recent animosities of a civil war, his death was universally lamented. The Barbarians, whom he had vanquished and the churchmen, by whom he had been subdued, celebrated, with loud and sincere applause, the qualities of the deceased emperor, which appeared the most valuable in their eyes. The Romans were terrified by the impending dangers of a feeble and divided administration, and every disgraceful moment of the unfortunate reigns of Arcadius and Honorius revived the memory of their irreparable loss.
After Eugenius was defeated, everyone in the Roman world happily recognized Theodosius's merit and authority. His past actions created high hopes for his future reign, and at just under fifty years old, the emperor seemed to promise a longer period of public happiness. His death, just four months after his victory, shocked people and crushed the hopes of the younger generation. However, the comfort of luxury had quietly fed the seeds of illness. Theodosius’s body couldn’t handle the sudden and harsh shift from palace life to military life, and the growing signs of dropsy indicated that his end was near. Public opinion, and perhaps public interest, had solidified the division between the Eastern and Western empires, and his two royal sons, Arcadius and Honorius, who, thanks to their father's affection, had already been given the title of Augustus, were set to occupy the thrones of Constantinople and Rome. These young princes weren’t allowed to participate in the risks and glory of the civil war, but once Theodosius triumphed over his undeserving foes, he called his younger son, Honorius, to reap the rewards of victory and receive the Western sceptre from his dying father. Honorius's arrival in Milan was celebrated with grand games at the Circus, and although the emperor struggled with his illness, he still added to the public's joy just by being there. But the little strength he had left was drained by the effort he put into attending the morning events. For the rest of the day, Honorius took his father's place, and later that night, the great Theodosius passed away. Despite the recent conflicts of the civil war, everyone mourned his death. The barbarians he had defeated and the church leaders who had opposed him praised him loudly and genuinely, valuing the qualities they admired most in the deceased emperor. The Romans were filled with dread at the thought of a weak and divided government, and every shameful moment during the unfortunate reigns of Arcadius and Honorius reminded them of their profound loss.
In the faithful picture of the virtues of Theodosius, his imperfections have not been dissembled; the act of cruelty, and the habits of indolence, which tarnished the glory of one of the greatest of the Roman princes. An historian, perpetually adverse to the fame of Theodosius, has exaggerated his vices, and their pernicious effects; he boldly asserts, that every rank of subjects imitated the effeminate manners of their sovereign; and that every species of corruption polluted the course of public and private life; and that the feeble restraints of order and decency were insufficient to resist the progress of that degenerate spirit, which sacrifices, without a blush, the consideration of duty and interest to the base indulgence of sloth and appetite. The complaints of contemporary writers, who deplore the increase of luxury, and depravation of manners, are commonly expressive of their peculiar temper and situation. There are few observers, who possess a clear and comprehensive view of the revolutions of society; and who are capable of discovering the nice and secret springs of action, which impel, in the same uniform direction, the blind and capricious passions of a multitude of individuals. If it can be affirmed, with any degree of truth, that the luxury of the Romans was more shameless and dissolute in the reign of Theodosius than in the age of Constantine, perhaps, or of Augustus, the alteration cannot be ascribed to any beneficial improvements, which had gradually increased the stock of national riches. A long period of calamity or decay must have checked the industry, and diminished the wealth, of the people; and their profuse luxury must have been the result of that indolent despair, which enjoys the present hour, and declines the thoughts of futurity. The uncertain condition of their property discouraged the subjects of Theodosius from engaging in those useful and laborious undertakings which require an immediate expense, and promise a slow and distant advantage. The frequent examples of ruin and desolation tempted them not to spare the remains of a patrimony, which might, every hour, become the prey of the rapacious Goth. And the mad prodigality which prevails in the confusion of a shipwreck, or a siege, may serve to explain the progress of luxury amidst the misfortunes and terrors of a sinking nation.
In the accurate portrayal of Theodosius's virtues, his flaws haven't been hidden; the acts of cruelty and the habits of laziness that blemished the reputation of one of the greatest Roman emperors. An historian, who was consistently opposed to Theodosius's legacy, has exaggerated his faults and their harmful effects; he boldly claims that every class of subjects mimicked the soft ways of their ruler, and that every kind of corruption tainted both public and private life, while the weak controls of order and decency were insufficient to withstand the spread of that degenerate spirit, which shamelessly puts aside duty and responsibility for the base pleasures of laziness and desire. Complaints from contemporary writers, who lament the rise of luxury and the decline in morals, often reflect their own temperament and circumstances. There are few observers who have a clear and comprehensive understanding of societal changes and can identify the subtle and hidden motivators that drive, in a consistent direction, the blind and unpredictable passions of a large number of people. If it can be said, with any truth, that Roman luxury was more blatant and debauched during Theodosius's reign than in the times of Constantine or Augustus, the change cannot be attributed to any beneficial improvements that have gradually increased the nation's wealth. A long period of hardship or decline must have stifled industry and reduced the wealth of the population; their extravagant luxury must have stemmed from a lazy despair that focuses on enjoying the present and neglects future considerations. The unstable nature of their assets discouraged Theodosius's subjects from pursuing useful and labor-intensive projects that require immediate spending with the promise of slow and distant rewards. The frequent instances of ruin and devastation led them to avoid preserving what remained of an inheritance that could be seized at any moment by the greedy Goths. The reckless extravagance seen in the chaos of a shipwreck or a siege may help explain the rise of luxury amidst the misfortunes and fears of a collapsing nation.
The effeminate luxury, which infected the manners of courts and cities, had instilled a secret and destructive poison into the camps of the legions; and their degeneracy has been marked by the pen of a military writer, who had accurately studied the genuine and ancient principles of Roman discipline. It is the just and important observation of Vegetius, that the infantry was invariably covered with defensive armor, from the foundation of the city, to the reign of the emperor Gratian. The relaxation of discipline, and the disuse of exercise, rendered the soldiers less able, and less willing, to support the fatigues of the service; they complained of the weight of the armor, which they seldom wore; and they successively obtained the permission of laying aside both their cuirasses and their helmets. The heavy weapons of their ancestors, the short sword, and the formidable pilum, which had subdued the world, insensibly dropped from their feeble hands. As the use of the shield is incompatible with that of the bow, they reluctantly marched into the field; condemned to suffer either the pain of wounds, or the ignominy of flight, and always disposed to prefer the more shameful alternative. The cavalry of the Goths, the Huns, and the Alani, had felt the benefits, and adopted the use, of defensive armor; and, as they excelled in the management of missile weapons, they easily overwhelmed the naked and trembling legions, whose heads and breasts were exposed, without defence, to the arrows of the Barbarians. The loss of armies, the destruction of cities, and the dishonor of the Roman name, ineffectually solicited the successors of Gratian to restore the helmets and the cuirasses of the infantry. The enervated soldiers abandoned their own and the public defence; and their pusillanimous indolence may be considered as the immediate cause of the downfall of the empire.
The excessive luxury that spread through the courts and cities had introduced a hidden and destructive poison into the military camps; and their decline has been documented by a military writer who had thoroughly examined the true and ancient principles of Roman discipline. Vegetius makes a valid and significant point that the infantry was consistently outfitted with protective armor, from the founding of the city up to the reign of Emperor Gratian. The relaxation of discipline and the lack of training made the soldiers less capable and less willing to endure the demands of service; they complained about the weight of the armor that they rarely wore, and gradually they received permission to remove both their breastplates and helmets. The heavy weapons of their ancestors, the short sword and the powerful pilum, which had once conquered the world, slowly slipped from their weak hands. Since using a shield isn't compatible with using a bow, they hesitated to go into battle; doomed to either suffer wounds or face shameful retreat, they often chose the more disgraceful option. The cavalry of the Goths, Huns, and Alani benefitted from and adopted the use of protective armor; and, being skilled in handling projectile weapons, they easily overwhelmed the unprotected and fearful legions, whose heads and chests were exposed to the arrows of the Barbarians. The loss of armies, the destruction of cities, and the disgrace of the Roman name begged the successors of Gratian to bring back the helmets and armor of the infantry, but to no avail. The weakened soldiers abandoned both their own defense and that of the state; and their cowardly laziness can be seen as a direct cause of the empire's downfall.
Chapter XXVIII: Destruction Of Paganism.—Part I.
Final Destruction Of Paganism.—Introduction Of The Worship Of Saints, And Relics, Among The Christians.
Final Destruction Of Paganism.—Introduction Of The Worship Of Saints, And Relics, Among The Christians.
The ruin of Paganism, in the age of Theodosius, is perhaps the only example of the total extirpation of any ancient and popular superstition; and may therefore deserve to be considered as a singular event in the history of the human mind. The Christians, more especially the clergy, had impatiently supported the prudent delays of Constantine, and the equal toleration of the elder Valentinian; nor could they deem their conquest perfect or secure, as long as their adversaries were permitted to exist. The influence which Ambrose and his brethren had acquired over the youth of Gratian, and the piety of Theodosius, was employed to infuse the maxims of persecution into the breasts of their Imperial proselytes. Two specious principles of religious jurisprudence were established, from whence they deduced a direct and rigorous conclusion, against the subjects of the empire who still adhered to the ceremonies of their ancestors: that the magistrate is, in some measure, guilty of the crimes which he neglects to prohibit, or to punish; and, that the idolatrous worship of fabulous deities, and real dæmons, is the most abominable crime against the supreme majesty of the Creator. The laws of Moses, and the examples of Jewish history, were hastily, perhaps erroneously, applied, by the clergy, to the mild and universal reign of Christianity. The zeal of the emperors was excited to vindicate their own honor, and that of the Deity: and the temples of the Roman world were subverted, about sixty years after the conversion of Constantine.
The downfall of Paganism during Theodosius's time might be the only instance of a complete eradication of an ancient and popular belief system, making it a unique event in the history of human thought. The Christians, especially the clergy, were impatient with the careful delays of Constantine and the equal tolerance shown by the earlier Valentinian. They couldn’t see their victory as complete or safe while their opponents were allowed to continue existing. The influence that Ambrose and his fellow clerics had over the youth of Gratian and the devotion of Theodosius was used to instill the ideas of persecution into their Imperial converts. Two persuasive principles of religious law were established, leading to a direct and harsh conclusion against the empire's subjects who still practiced the traditions of their ancestors: that officials are somewhat guilty for the crimes they fail to prevent or punish; and that the idol worship of mythical gods and real demons is the most detestable offense against the supreme authority of the Creator. The laws of Moses and examples from Jewish history were quickly, and perhaps incorrectly, applied by the clergy to the gentle and universal rule of Christianity. The emperors' zeal was heightened to defend their own honor and that of God; as a result, the temples of the Roman world were destroyed about sixty years after Constantine's conversion.
From the age of Numa to the reign of Gratian, the Romans preserved the regular succession of the several colleges of the sacerdotal order. Fifteen Pontiffs exercised their supreme jurisdiction over all things, and persons, that were consecrated to the service of the gods; and the various questions which perpetually arose in a loose and traditionary system, were submitted to the judgment of their holy tribunal Fifteen grave and learned Augurs observed the face of the heavens, and prescribed the actions of heroes, according to the flight of birds. Fifteen keepers of the Sibylline books (their name of Quindecemvirs was derived from their number) occasionally consulted the history of future, and, as it should seem, of contingent, events. Six Vestals devoted their virginity to the guard of the sacred fire, and of the unknown pledges of the duration of Rome; which no mortal had been suffered to behold with impunity. Seven Epulos prepared the table of the gods, conducted the solemn procession, and regulated the ceremonies of the annual festival. The three Flamens of Jupiter, of Mars, and of Quirinus, were considered as the peculiar ministers of the three most powerful deities, who watched over the fate of Rome and of the universe. The King of the Sacrifices represented the person of Numa, and of his successors, in the religious functions, which could be performed only by royal hands. The confraternities of the Salians, the Lupercals, &c., practised such rites as might extort a smile of contempt from every reasonable man, with a lively confidence of recommending themselves to the favor of the immortal gods. The authority, which the Roman priests had formerly obtained in the counsels of the republic, was gradually abolished by the establishment of monarchy, and the removal of the seat of empire. But the dignity of their sacred character was still protected by the laws, and manners of their country; and they still continued, more especially the college of pontiffs, to exercise in the capital, and sometimes in the provinces, the rights of their ecclesiastical and civil jurisdiction. Their robes of purple, chariots of state, and sumptuous entertainments, attracted the admiration of the people; and they received, from the consecrated lands, and the public revenue, an ample stipend, which liberally supported the splendor of the priesthood, and all the expenses of the religious worship of the state. As the service of the altar was not incompatible with the command of armies, the Romans, after their consulships and triumphs, aspired to the place of pontiff, or of augur; the seats of Cicero and Pompey were filled, in the fourth century, by the most illustrious members of the senate; and the dignity of their birth reflected additional splendor on their sacerdotal character. The fifteen priests, who composed the college of pontiffs, enjoyed a more distinguished rank as the companions of their sovereign; and the Christian emperors condescended to accept the robe and ensigns, which were appropriated to the office of supreme pontiff. But when Gratian ascended the throne, more scrupulous or more enlightened, he sternly rejected those profane symbols; applied to the service of the state, or of the church, the revenues of the priests and vestals; abolished their honors and immunities; and dissolved the ancient fabric of Roman superstition, which was supported by the opinions and habits of eleven hundred years. Paganism was still the constitutional religion of the senate. The hall, or temple, in which they assembled, was adorned by the statue and altar of Victory; a majestic female standing on a globe, with flowing garments, expanded wings, and a crown of laurel in her outstretched hand. The senators were sworn on the altar of the goddess to observe the laws of the emperor and of the empire: and a solemn offering of wine and incense was the ordinary prelude of their public deliberations. The removal of this ancient monument was the only injury which Constantius had offered to the superstition of the Romans. The altar of Victory was again restored by Julian, tolerated by Valentinian, and once more banished from the senate by the zeal of Gratian. But the emperor yet spared the statues of the gods which were exposed to the public veneration: four hundred and twenty-four temples, or chapels, still remained to satisfy the devotion of the people; and in every quarter of Rome the delicacy of the Christians was offended by the fumes of idolatrous sacrifice.
From the time of Numa to the reign of Gratian, the Romans maintained a steady succession of various priestly colleges. Fifteen Pontiffs held ultimate authority over everything and everyone dedicated to the gods' service. The ongoing issues that arose in a loose and traditional system were settled by their sacred tribunal. Fifteen serious and knowledgeable Augurs observed the sky and dictated the actions of heroes based on the flight of birds. Fifteen keepers of the Sibylline books (their name, Quindecemvirs, came from their number) occasionally consulted these texts about future events and seemingly random occurrences. Six Vestals committed their virginity to guarding the sacred fire and the mysterious vows related to the endurance of Rome, which no mortal could safely see. Seven Epulos prepared the gods' banquet, led the solemn processions, and organized the rituals of the annual festival. The three Flamens of Jupiter, Mars, and Quirinus were seen as the specific ministers of the three most powerful deities watching over Rome and the universe. The King of the Sacrifices represented Numa and his successors in religious duties that only royal hands could perform. The fraternities of the Salians, the Lupercals, etc., conducted rituals that might draw a scornful smile from any rational person, yet believed wholeheartedly they were winning the favor of the immortal gods. The authority that Roman priests once held in the republic's decisions was gradually diminished with the rise of monarchy and the relocation of the seat of power. Despite this, the sanctity of their role continued to be upheld by the laws and customs of their land, and they still held, particularly the college of pontiffs, the rights of their ecclesiastical and civil authority in the capital and occasionally in the provinces. Their purple robes, state chariots, and lavish feasts won the admiration of the public, and they received generous salaries from consecrated lands and state funds, which maintained the grandeur of the priesthood and the costs of state-sponsored religious practices. Since altar service did not conflict with military command, Romans sought the role of pontiff or augur after their consulate and triumphs; in the fourth century, the seats of Cicero and Pompey were filled by the most distinguished senators, and their noble heritage added to their priestly prominence. The fifteen priests in the college of pontiffs had a more prestigious status as companions of the ruler, and the Christian emperors accepted the garments and symbols specific to the position of supreme pontiff. However, when Gratian came to power, either more cautious or enlightened, he firmly rejected those secular symbols, redirected the priests' and Vestals' revenues to the state's or the church's service, eliminated their honors and privileges, and dismantled the long-standing structure of Roman superstition backed by beliefs and practices of over eleven hundred years. Paganism remained the official religion of the senate. The hall or temple where they met featured the statue and altar of Victory, a majestic woman standing on a globe, dressed in flowing robes, with wings spread and a laurel crown in her outstretched hand. Senators swore on the goddess's altar to uphold the emperor's and the empire's laws, and a formal offering of wine and incense was the usual prelude to their public discussions. The removal of this ancient monument was the only offense Constantius inflicted on Roman superstition. Julian restored the altar of Victory, Valentinian tolerated it, but it was once again removed from the senate by Gratian's fervor. Nevertheless, the emperor still spared the statues of the gods publicly revered; four hundred and twenty-four temples or chapels remained to cater to the people's devotion, and in every part of Rome, Christians were offended by the smoke of idolatrous sacrifices.
But the Christians formed the least numerous party in the senate of Rome: and it was only by their absence, that they could express their dissent from the legal, though profane, acts of a Pagan majority. In that assembly, the dying embers of freedom were, for a moment, revived and inflamed by the breath of fanaticism. Four respectable deputations were successively voted to the Imperial court, to represent the grievances of the priesthood and the senate, and to solicit the restoration of the altar of Victory. The conduct of this important business was intrusted to the eloquent Symmachus, a wealthy and noble senator, who united the sacred characters of pontiff and augur with the civil dignities of proconsul of Africa and præfect of the city. The breast of Symmachus was animated by the warmest zeal for the cause of expiring Paganism; and his religious antagonists lamented the abuse of his genius, and the inefficacy of his moral virtues. The orator, whose petition is extant to the emperor Valentinian, was conscious of the difficulty and danger of the office which he had assumed. He cautiously avoids every topic which might appear to reflect on the religion of his sovereign; humbly declares, that prayers and entreaties are his only arms; and artfully draws his arguments from the schools of rhetoric, rather than from those of philosophy. Symmachus endeavors to seduce the imagination of a young prince, by displaying the attributes of the goddess of victory; he insinuates, that the confiscation of the revenues, which were consecrated to the service of the gods, was a measure unworthy of his liberal and disinterested character; and he maintains, that the Roman sacrifices would be deprived of their force and energy, if they were no longer celebrated at the expense, as well as in the name, of the republic. Even scepticism is made to supply an apology for superstition. The great and incomprehensible secret of the universe eludes the inquiry of man. Where reason cannot instruct, custom may be permitted to guide; and every nation seems to consult the dictates of prudence, by a faithful attachment to those rites and opinions, which have received the sanction of ages. If those ages have been crowned with glory and prosperity, if the devout people have frequently obtained the blessings which they have solicited at the altars of the gods, it must appear still more advisable to persist in the same salutary practice; and not to risk the unknown perils that may attend any rash innovations. The test of antiquity and success was applied with singular advantage to the religion of Numa; and Rome herself, the celestial genius that presided over the fates of the city, is introduced by the orator to plead her own cause before the tribunal of the emperors. "Most excellent princes," says the venerable matron, "fathers of your country! pity and respect my age, which has hitherto flowed in an uninterrupted course of piety. Since I do not repent, permit me to continue in the practice of my ancient rites. Since I am born free, allow me to enjoy my domestic institutions. This religion has reduced the world under my laws. These rites have repelled Hannibal from the city, and the Gauls from the Capitol. Were my gray hairs reserved for such intolerable disgrace? I am ignorant of the new system that I am required to adopt; but I am well assured, that the correction of old age is always an ungrateful and ignominious office." The fears of the people supplied what the discretion of the orator had suppressed; and the calamities, which afflicted, or threatened, the declining empire, were unanimously imputed, by the Pagans, to the new religion of Christ and of Constantine.
But the Christians were the smallest group in the Roman senate, and it was only through their absence that they could show their disagreement with the legal, yet irreverent, actions of a Pagan majority. In that assembly, the fading sparks of freedom were briefly rekindled by the flame of fanaticism. Four respected delegations were successively sent to the Imperial court to represent the grievances of the priesthood and the senate and to request the restoration of the altar of Victory. The responsibility for this important task was entrusted to the eloquent Symmachus, a wealthy and noble senator who held both the sacred titles of pontiff and augur, along with the civil offices of proconsul of Africa and prefect of the city. Symmachus had a deep passion for the cause of dying Paganism, and his religious opponents lamented the misuse of his talents and the ineffectiveness of his moral qualities. The orator, whose petition to Emperor Valentinian is still available, was well aware of the difficulty and danger of the position he had taken. He carefully avoids any topic that might seem to criticize the religion of his sovereign; he humbly states that prayers and pleas are his only weapons and cleverly bases his arguments more on rhetoric than philosophy. Symmachus attempts to appeal to the imagination of a young prince by highlighting the qualities of the goddess of victory; he suggests that taking away the revenues dedicated to the gods was an act unworthy of the prince's generous and selfless nature; and he argues that Roman sacrifices would lose their power and effectiveness if they were no longer performed at the cost, as well as in the name, of the republic. Even skepticism is used to justify superstition. The great and unfathomable secret of the universe remains beyond human understanding. Where reason fails, custom can be allowed to lead; and every nation seems to agree with the wisdom of sticking to the traditions and beliefs that have stood the test of time. If those times were marked by glory and prosperity, if the faithful have frequently received the blessings they sought at the altars of the gods, it seems even more sensible to continue those beneficial practices and not risk the unknown dangers that could come from reckless changes. The criteria of age and success were particularly advantageous for the religion of Numa; and even Rome herself, the divine force that governed the fate of the city, is brought before the emperors by the orator to plead her own case. "Most excellent princes," says the venerable matron, "fathers of your country! Have compassion for my age, which has remained devoted for so long. Since I do not regret it, allow me to continue my ancient practices. Since I am born free, let me follow my traditional ways. This religion has brought the world under my laws. These rituals have driven Hannibal from the city and the Gauls from the Capitol. Were my gray hairs meant for such disgrace? I am not familiar with the new system I am expected to embrace; but I am certain that changing old traditions in old age is always a thankless and shameful task." The fears of the people voiced what the orator had held back; and the troubles that plagued or threatened the weakening empire were collectively blamed by the Pagans on the new religion of Christ and Constantine.
But the hopes of Symmachus were repeatedly baffled by the firm and dexterous opposition of the archbishop of Milan, who fortified the emperors against the fallacious eloquence of the advocate of Rome. In this controversy, Ambrose condescends to speak the language of a philosopher, and to ask, with some contempt, why it should be thought necessary to introduce an imaginary and invisible power, as the cause of those victories, which were sufficiently explained by the valor and discipline of the legions. He justly derides the absurd reverence for antiquity, which could only tend to discourage the improvements of art, and to replunge the human race into their original barbarism. From thence, gradually rising to a more lofty and theological tone, he pronounces, that Christianity alone is the doctrine of truth and salvation; and that every mode of Polytheism conducts its deluded votaries, through the paths of error, to the abyss of eternal perdition. Arguments like these, when they were suggested by a favorite bishop, had power to prevent the restoration of the altar of Victory; but the same arguments fell, with much more energy and effect, from the mouth of a conqueror; and the gods of antiquity were dragged in triumph at the chariot-wheels of Theodosius. In a full meeting of the senate, the emperor proposed, according to the forms of the republic, the important question, Whether the worship of Jupiter, or that of Christ, should be the religion of the Romans. The liberty of suffrages, which he affected to allow, was destroyed by the hopes and fears that his presence inspired; and the arbitrary exile of Symmachus was a recent admonition, that it might be dangerous to oppose the wishes of the monarch. On a regular division of the senate, Jupiter was condemned and degraded by the sense of a very large majority; and it is rather surprising, that any members should be found bold enough to declare, by their speeches and votes, that they were still attached to the interest of an abdicated deity. The hasty conversion of the senate must be attributed either to supernatural or to sordid motives; and many of these reluctant proselytes betrayed, on every favorable occasion, their secret disposition to throw aside the mask of odious dissimulation. But they were gradually fixed in the new religion, as the cause of the ancient became more hopeless; they yielded to the authority of the emperor, to the fashion of the times, and to the entreaties of their wives and children, who were instigated and governed by the clergy of Rome and the monks of the East. The edifying example of the Anician family was soon imitated by the rest of the nobility: the Bassi, the Paullini, the Gracchi, embraced the Christian religion; and "the luminaries of the world, the venerable assembly of Catos (such are the high-flown expressions of Prudentius) were impatient to strip themselves of their pontifical garment; to cast the skin of the old serpent; to assume the snowy robes of baptismal innocence, and to humble the pride of the consular fasces before tombs of the martyrs." The citizens, who subsisted by their own industry, and the populace, who were supported by the public liberality, filled the churches of the Lateran, and Vatican, with an incessant throng of devout proselytes. The decrees of the senate, which proscribed the worship of idols, were ratified by the general consent of the Romans; the splendor of the Capitol was defaced, and the solitary temples were abandoned to ruin and contempt. Rome submitted to the yoke of the Gospel; and the vanquished provinces had not yet lost their reverence for the name and authority of Rome.
But Symmachus's hopes were repeatedly thwarted by the strong and skillful opposition of the Archbishop of Milan, who strengthened the emperors against the misleading arguments of the advocate for Rome. In this debate, Ambrose chooses to speak like a philosopher and contemptuously questions why it’s believed necessary to introduce an imaginary and invisible power as the cause of victories that could be easily explained by the courage and discipline of the legions. He rightly mocks the ridiculous reverence for the past, which only serves to hinder advancements in art and throw humanity back into its original barbarism. Gradually rising to a more elevated and theological tone, he declares that Christianity is the sole doctrine of truth and salvation, and that any form of Polytheism leads its misguided followers down the paths of error to eternal damnation. Arguments like these, when put forth by a favored bishop, had the power to prevent the restoration of the altar of Victory; however, the same arguments came with much more force and impact from the mouth of a conqueror, and the gods of antiquity were paraded in triumph behind Theodosius’s chariot. In a full meeting of the Senate, the emperor, following the practices of the republic, posed the crucial question of whether the worship of Jupiter or that of Christ should be the religion of the Romans. The supposed freedom of votes, which he pretended to allow, was undermined by the hopes and fears that his presence instilled; and the arbitrary exile of Symmachus was a recent warning that opposing the wishes of the monarch could be dangerous. In a formal vote of the Senate, Jupiter was denounced and degraded by the overwhelming majority; it is rather surprising that any members were found bold enough to openly declare, through their speeches and votes, that they still supported the interests of a dethroned deity. The swift conversion of the Senate must be attributed either to supernatural or to greedy motives; many of these unwilling converts revealed, whenever possible, their secret inclination to discard the mask of repulsive insincerity. But they gradually settled into the new religion, as the cause of the ancient became more desperate; they yielded to the emperor's authority, the trends of the time, and the pleas of their wives and children, who were influenced and guided by the clergy of Rome and the monks of the East. The inspiring example set by the Anician family was soon mimicked by the rest of the nobility: the Bassi, the Paullini, and the Gracchi embraced the Christian faith; and "the shining lights of the world, the esteemed assembly of Catos (such are the grand expressions of Prudentius) were eager to shed their priestly garments; to cast off the skin of the old serpent; to don the pure robes of baptismal innocence, and to humble the pride of the consular fasces before the tombs of the martyrs." The citizens, who supported themselves through their own labor, and the masses, who benefited from public generosity, filled the churches of Lateran and Vatican with a constant stream of devout converts. The Senate’s decrees, which forbade the worship of idols, were approved by the collective consent of the Romans; the glory of the Capitol was tarnished, and the once-bustling temples were left to decay and neglect. Rome surrendered to the influence of the Gospel; and the conquered provinces had not yet forgotten their respect for the name and authority of Rome.
Chapter XXVIII: Destruction Of Paganism.—Part II.
The filial piety of the emperors themselves engaged them to proceed, with some caution and tenderness, in the reformation of the eternal city. Those absolute monarchs acted with less regard to the prejudices of the provincials. The pious labor which had been suspended near twenty years since the death of Constantius, was vigorously resumed, and finally accomplished, by the zeal of Theodosius. Whilst that warlike prince yet struggled with the Goths, not for the glory, but for the safety, of the republic, he ventured to offend a considerable party of his subjects, by some acts which might perhaps secure the protection of Heaven, but which must seem rash and unseasonable in the eye of human prudence. The success of his first experiments against the Pagans encouraged the pious emperor to reiterate and enforce his edicts of proscription: the same laws which had been originally published in the provinces of the East, were applied, after the defeat of Maximus, to the whole extent of the Western empire; and every victory of the orthodox Theodosius contributed to the triumph of the Christian and Catholic faith. He attacked superstition in her most vital part, by prohibiting the use of sacrifices, which he declared to be criminal as well as infamous; and if the terms of his edicts more strictly condemned the impious curiosity which examined the entrails of the victim, every subsequent explanation tended to involve in the same guilt the general practice of immolation, which essentially constituted the religion of the Pagans. As the temples had been erected for the purpose of sacrifice, it was the duty of a benevolent prince to remove from his subjects the dangerous temptation of offending against the laws which he had enacted. A special commission was granted to Cynegius, the Prætorian præfect of the East, and afterwards to the counts Jovius and Gaudentius, two officers of distinguished rank in the West; by which they were directed to shut the temples, to seize or destroy the instruments of idolatry, to abolish the privileges of the priests, and to confiscate the consecrated property for the benefit of the emperor, of the church, or of the army. Here the desolation might have stopped: and the naked edifices, which were no longer employed in the service of idolatry, might have been protected from the destructive rage of fanaticism. Many of those temples were the most splendid and beautiful monuments of Grecian architecture; and the emperor himself was interested not to deface the splendor of his own cities, or to diminish the value of his own possessions. Those stately edifices might be suffered to remain, as so many lasting trophies of the victory of Christ. In the decline of the arts they might be usefully converted into magazines, manufactures, or places of public assembly: and perhaps, when the walls of the temple had been sufficiently purified by holy rites, the worship of the true Deity might be allowed to expiate the ancient guilt of idolatry. But as long as they subsisted, the Pagans fondly cherished the secret hope, that an auspicious revolution, a second Julian, might again restore the altars of the gods: and the earnestness with which they addressed their unavailing prayers to the throne, increased the zeal of the Christian reformers to extirpate, without mercy, the root of superstition. The laws of the emperors exhibit some symptoms of a milder disposition: but their cold and languid efforts were insufficient to stem the torrent of enthusiasm and rapine, which was conducted, or rather impelled, by the spiritual rulers of the church. In Gaul, the holy Martin, bishop of Tours, marched at the head of his faithful monks to destroy the idols, the temples, and the consecrated trees of his extensive diocese; and, in the execution of this arduous task, the prudent reader will judge whether Martin was supported by the aid of miraculous powers, or of carnal weapons. In Syria, the divine and excellent Marcellus, as he is styled by Theodoret, a bishop animated with apostolic fervor, resolved to level with the ground the stately temples within the diocese of Apamea. His attack was resisted by the skill and solidity with which the temple of Jupiter had been constructed. The building was seated on an eminence: on each of the four sides, the lofty roof was supported by fifteen massy columns, sixteen feet in circumference; and the large stone, of which they were composed, were firmly cemented with lead and iron. The force of the strongest and sharpest tools had been tried without effect. It was found necessary to undermine the foundations of the columns, which fell down as soon as the temporary wooden props had been consumed with fire; and the difficulties of the enterprise are described under the allegory of a black dæmon, who retarded, though he could not defeat, the operations of the Christian engineers. Elated with victory, Marcellus took the field in person against the powers of darkness; a numerous troop of soldiers and gladiators marched under the episcopal banner, and he successively attacked the villages and country temples of the diocese of Apamea. Whenever any resistance or danger was apprehended, the champion of the faith, whose lameness would not allow him either to fight or fly, placed himself at a convenient distance, beyond the reach of darts. But this prudence was the occasion of his death: he was surprised and slain by a body of exasperated rustics; and the synod of the province pronounced, without hesitation, that the holy Marcellus had sacrificed his life in the cause of God. In the support of this cause, the monks, who rushed with tumultuous fury from the desert, distinguished themselves by their zeal and diligence. They deserved the enmity of the Pagans; and some of them might deserve the reproaches of avarice and intemperance; of avarice, which they gratified with holy plunder, and of intemperance, which they indulged at the expense of the people, who foolishly admired their tattered garments, loud psalmody, and artificial paleness. A small number of temples was protected by the fears, the venality, the taste, or the prudence, of the civil and ecclesiastical governors. The temple of the Celestial Venus at Carthage, whose sacred precincts formed a circumference of two miles, was judiciously converted into a Christian church; and a similar consecration has preserved inviolate the majestic dome of the Pantheon at Rome. But in almost every province of the Roman world, an army of fanatics, without authority, and without discipline, invaded the peaceful inhabitants; and the ruin of the fairest structures of antiquity still displays the ravages of those Barbarians, who alone had time and inclination to execute such laborious destruction.
The respect the emperors had for their forebears made them careful and considerate in reforming the eternal city. These absolute rulers were less concerned about the biases of the local people. The dedicated efforts that had been paused for nearly twenty years after Constantius's death were vigorously taken up and completed by Theodosius's enthusiasm. While that military leader was still fighting the Goths—not for glory, but for the safety of the republic—he risked angering a significant portion of his subjects with actions that might secure divine protection, though they seemed rash and poorly timed from a human perspective. The success of his early actions against the Pagans encouraged the devout emperor to repeat and enforce his bans on pagan practices: the same laws that had been initially issued in the Eastern provinces were extended to the entire Western empire after Maximus was defeated, and every victory by the orthodox Theodosius bolstered the success of the Christian faith. He attacked superstition at its core by banning sacrifices, which he declared to be both criminal and disgraceful. If his edicts condemned the impious curiosity examining the entrails of victims, future interpretations implicated the overall practice of immolation, the very foundation of Pagan worship. Since temples existed for sacrifices, it was the responsibility of a compassionate prince to shield his people from the peril of breaking the laws he had set. Cynegius, the Praetorian prefect of the East, along with counts Jovius and Gaudentius, two high-ranking officials in the West, were given special commissions to close the temples, seize or destroy idolatrous items, eliminate the priests' privileges, and confiscate the sacred properties for the emperor, the church, or the military. This could have marked the end of the destruction; the empty buildings, no longer used for idol worship, might have been preserved from the fanaticism's destructive impulses. Many of those temples were magnificent examples of Grecian architecture, and the emperor himself had a vested interest in not ruining the beauty of his cities or diminishing his own assets. Those grand structures could remain as lasting trophies of Christ's victory. In the decline of the arts, they could be repurposed for storage, manufacturing, or public gatherings; perhaps, once the temple walls were sufficiently cleansed by holy rites, the worship of the true God could atone for the old sins of idolatry. However, as long as they stood, the Pagans held on to the secret hope that a fortunate shift—a second Julian—might restore the altars of their gods. The passion with which they directed their futile prayers to the throne only fueled the Christian reformers' determination to eradicate superstition without mercy. The emperors’ laws showed some signs of a more lenient attitude, but their tepid responses were not enough to counter the wave of enthusiasm and pillaging led by the church's spiritual leaders. In Gaul, the holy Martin, Bishop of Tours, led his devout monks to destroy idols, temples, and sacred trees across his diocese, and a careful reader can ponder whether Martin was aided by miraculous powers or simply by tangible weapons. In Syria, the divine and remarkable Marcellus—a bishop filled with apostolic fervor—decided to demolish the grand temples in the diocese of Apamea. His efforts met resistance from the impressive engineering of the temple of Jupiter. The temple sat on high ground, with each of its four sides supported by fifteen massive columns, each measuring sixteen feet around, and their heavy stones were securely bonded with lead and iron. Despite trying with the strongest tools, success eluded them. They had to undermine the columns’ foundations, which fell as soon as the temporary wooden supports were burned; the challenges of this task were illustrated as a dark demon who hindered, though did not fully stop, the actions of the Christian builders. Buoyed by victory, Marcellus personally took on the forces of darkness; a large group of soldiers and gladiators followed his episcopal standard, attacking the villages and rural temples around Apamea. Whenever resistance or danger loomed, the champion of faith, unable to fight or flee due to his lameness, kept his distance, out of range of the weapons. This caution, however, led to his death when he was ambushed and killed by an angry mob of local farmers; the provincial synod declared without hesitation that the holy Marcellus had given his life for God's cause. In this effort, the monks surged with fervor and determination from their desert fasts. They earned the animosity of the Pagans, and some might also deserve criticism for greed and excess—greed satisfied through holy pillaging and excess enjoyed at the expense of the foolish people who admired their tattered robes, loud hymns, and feigned pallor. A few temples escaped destruction through the fears, corruption, tastes, or wisdom of civil and church leaders. The temple of Celestial Venus in Carthage, whose sacred grounds spanned two miles, was wisely converted into a Christian church, and a similar transformation preserved the magnificent dome of the Pantheon in Rome. Yet, in nearly every province of the Roman Empire, a group of fanatics, lacking authority and organization, invaded peaceful communities; the decimation of the most beautiful ancient structures still shows the scars left by those who alone had the time and desire to carry out such destructive work.
In this wide and various prospect of devastation, the spectator may distinguish the ruins of the temple of Serapis, at Alexandria. Serapis does not appear to have been one of the native gods, or monsters, who sprung from the fruitful soil of superstitious Egypt. The first of the Ptolemies had been commanded, by a dream, to import the mysterious stranger from the coast of Pontus, where he had been long adored by the inhabitants of Sinope; but his attributes and his reign were so imperfectly understood, that it became a subject of dispute, whether he represented the bright orb of day, or the gloomy monarch of the subterraneous regions. The Egyptians, who were obstinately devoted to the religion of their fathers, refused to admit this foreign deity within the walls of their cities. But the obsequious priests, who were seduced by the liberality of the Ptolemies, submitted, without resistance, to the power of the god of Pontus: an honorable and domestic genealogy was provided; and this fortunate usurper was introduced into the throne and bed of Osiris, the husband of Isis, and the celestial monarch of Egypt. Alexandria, which claimed his peculiar protection, gloried in the name of the city of Serapis. His temple, which rivalled the pride and magnificence of the Capitol, was erected on the spacious summit of an artificial mount, raised one hundred steps above the level of the adjacent parts of the city; and the interior cavity was strongly supported by arches, and distributed into vaults and subterraneous apartments. The consecrated buildings were surrounded by a quadrangular portico; the stately halls, and exquisite statues, displayed the triumph of the arts; and the treasures of ancient learning were preserved in the famous Alexandrian library, which had arisen with new splendor from its ashes. After the edicts of Theodosius had severely prohibited the sacrifices of the Pagans, they were still tolerated in the city and temple of Serapis; and this singular indulgence was imprudently ascribed to the superstitious terrors of the Christians themselves; as if they had feared to abolish those ancient rites, which could alone secure the inundations of the Nile, the harvests of Egypt, and the subsistence of Constantinople.
In this broad and varied view of destruction, the observer can spot the ruins of the temple of Serapis in Alexandria. Serapis doesn't seem to have been one of the local gods or monsters that emerged from the fertile ground of superstitious Egypt. The first of the Ptolemies was told in a dream to bring this mysterious figure from the coast of Pontus, where he had long been worshiped by the people of Sinope; however, his nature and reign were not well understood, leading to debates about whether he symbolized the bright sun or the dark ruler of the underworld. The Egyptians, who were stubbornly devoted to their ancestral beliefs, refused to accept this foreign deity within their city walls. Yet, the compliant priests, swayed by the generosity of the Ptolemies, yielded without protest to the power of the god of Pontus: an honorable and local lineage was created for him, and this fortunate interloper was welcomed into the throne and bed of Osiris, the husband of Isis and the heavenly ruler of Egypt. Alexandria, which claimed his special protection, proudly called itself the city of Serapis. His temple, which rivaled the grandeur and magnificence of the Capitol, was built on a large artificial mound, raised one hundred steps above the surrounding parts of the city; and the inner structure was supported by arches and divided into vaults and underground rooms. The sanctified buildings were encircled by a square portico; the impressive halls and exquisite statues showcased the triumph of the arts, and the treasures of ancient knowledge were kept in the renowned Alexandrian library, which had risen with renewed brilliance from its ashes. After Theodosius's decrees had strictly banned Pagan sacrifices, they were still allowed in the city and temple of Serapis; and this unusual tolerance was foolishly attributed to the superstitious fears of the Christians themselves, as if they were afraid to abolish those ancient rituals that alone could ensure the flooding of the Nile, the harvests of Egypt, and the survival of Constantinople.
At that time the archiepiscopal throne of Alexandria was filled by Theophilus, the perpetual enemy of peace and virtue; a bold, bad man, whose hands were alternately polluted with gold and with blood. His pious indignation was excited by the honors of Serapis; and the insults which he offered to an ancient temple of Bacchus, convinced the Pagans that he meditated a more important and dangerous enterprise. In the tumultuous capital of Egypt, the slightest provocation was sufficient to inflame a civil war. The votaries of Serapis, whose strength and numbers were much inferior to those of their antagonists, rose in arms at the instigation of the philosopher Olympius, who exhorted them to die in the defence of the altars of the gods. These Pagan fanatics fortified themselves in the temple, or rather fortress, of Serapis; repelled the besiegers by daring sallies, and a resolute defence; and, by the inhuman cruelties which they exercised on their Christian prisoners, obtained the last consolation of despair. The efforts of the prudent magistrate were usefully exerted for the establishment of a truce, till the answer of Theodosius should determine the fate of Serapis. The two parties assembled, without arms, in the principal square; and the Imperial rescript was publicly read. But when a sentence of destruction against the idols of Alexandria was pronounced, the Christians set up a shout of joy and exultation, whilst the unfortunate Pagans, whose fury had given way to consternation, retired with hasty and silent steps, and eluded, by their flight or obscurity, the resentment of their enemies. Theophilus proceeded to demolish the temple of Serapis, without any other difficulties, than those which he found in the weight and solidity of the materials: but these obstacles proved so insuperable, that he was obliged to leave the foundations; and to content himself with reducing the edifice itself to a heap of rubbish, a part of which was soon afterwards cleared away, to make room for a church, erected in honor of the Christian martyrs. The valuable library of Alexandria was pillaged or destroyed; and near twenty years afterwards, the appearance of the empty shelves excited the regret and indignation of every spectator, whose mind was not totally darkened by religious prejudice. The compositions of ancient genius, so many of which have irretrievably perished, might surely have been excepted from the wreck of idolatry, for the amusement and instruction of succeeding ages; and either the zeal or the avarice of the archbishop, might have been satiated with the rich spoils, which were the reward of his victory. While the images and vases of gold and silver were carefully melted, and those of a less valuable metal were contemptuously broken, and cast into the streets, Theophilus labored to expose the frauds and vices of the ministers of the idols; their dexterity in the management of the loadstone; their secret methods of introducing a human actor into a hollow statue; and their scandalous abuse of the confidence of devout husbands and unsuspecting females. Charges like these may seem to deserve some degree of credit, as they are not repugnant to the crafty and interested spirit of superstition. But the same spirit is equally prone to the base practice of insulting and calumniating a fallen enemy; and our belief is naturally checked by the reflection, that it is much less difficult to invent a fictitious story, than to support a practical fraud. The colossal statue of Serapis was involved in the ruin of his temple and religion. A great number of plates of different metals, artificially joined together, composed the majestic figure of the deity, who touched on either side the walls of the sanctuary. The aspect of Serapis, his sitting posture, and the sceptre, which he bore in his left hand, were extremely similar to the ordinary representations of Jupiter. He was distinguished from Jupiter by the basket, or bushel, which was placed on his head; and by the emblematic monster which he held in his right hand; the head and body of a serpent branching into three tails, which were again terminated by the triple heads of a dog, a lion, and a wolf. It was confidently affirmed, that if any impious hand should dare to violate the majesty of the god, the heavens and the earth would instantly return to their original chaos. An intrepid soldier, animated by zeal, and armed with a weighty battle-axe, ascended the ladder; and even the Christian multitude expected, with some anxiety, the event of the combat. He aimed a vigorous stroke against the cheek of Serapis; the cheek fell to the ground; the thunder was still silent, and both the heavens and the earth continued to preserve their accustomed order and tranquillity. The victorious soldier repeated his blows: the huge idol was overthrown, and broken in pieces; and the limbs of Serapis were ignominiously dragged through the streets of Alexandria. His mangled carcass was burnt in the Amphitheatre, amidst the shouts of the populace; and many persons attributed their conversion to this discovery of the impotence of their tutelar deity. The popular modes of religion, that propose any visible and material objects of worship, have the advantage of adapting and familiarizing themselves to the senses of mankind: but this advantage is counterbalanced by the various and inevitable accidents to which the faith of the idolater is exposed. It is scarcely possible, that, in every disposition of mind, he should preserve his implicit reverence for the idols, or the relics, which the naked eye, and the profane hand, are unable to distinguish from the most common productions of art or nature; and if, in the hour of danger, their secret and miraculous virtue does not operate for their own preservation, he scorns the vain apologies of his priests, and justly derides the object, and the folly, of his superstitious attachment. After the fall of Serapis, some hopes were still entertained by the Pagans, that the Nile would refuse his annual supply to the impious masters of Egypt; and the extraordinary delay of the inundation seemed to announce the displeasure of the river-god. But this delay was soon compensated by the rapid swell of the waters. They suddenly rose to such an unusual height, as to comfort the discontented party with the pleasing expectation of a deluge; till the peaceful river again subsided to the well-known and fertilizing level of sixteen cubits, or about thirty English feet.
At that time, the archbishop's seat in Alexandria was held by Theophilus, a constant enemy of peace and virtue; a bold, wicked man whose hands were stained with both gold and blood. His righteous anger was sparked by the reverence for Serapis, and the disrespect he showed to an ancient temple of Bacchus convinced the Pagans that he was planning something even more significant and dangerous. In the chaotic capital of Egypt, even the slightest provocation could ignite a civil war. The followers of Serapis, whose strength and numbers were much smaller than their opponents, took up arms at the urging of the philosopher Olympius, who encouraged them to fight to defend their gods' altars. These Pagan fanatics fortified themselves in the temple, or rather the fortress, of Serapis; they fought back against the attackers with daring sorties and determined defense, and through the cruel treatment of their Christian prisoners, they found a desolate consolation. The wise magistrate worked to establish a truce until Theodosius' response could decide Serapis's fate. The two factions gathered, unarmed, in the main square, and the Imperial decree was read aloud. However, when a sentence of destruction was declared against Alexandria's idols, the Christians erupted in cheers and celebration, while the unfortunate Pagans, whose anger turned to shock, retreated quickly and quietly, avoiding their enemies' wrath through their hasty exit. Theophilus began demolishing the temple of Serapis, facing only the challenges of the heavy and solid materials; but these obstacles proved so insurmountable that he had to leave the foundations intact and content himself with turning the structure into a pile of rubble, part of which was soon cleared away to make room for a church dedicated to the Christian martyrs. The valuable library of Alexandria was either plundered or destroyed, and nearly twenty years later, the sight of the empty shelves stirred the sorrow and anger of every observer who wasn’t blinded by religious bias. The works of ancient genius, many of which have been lost forever, surely could have been spared from the wreckage of idolatry, to entertain and educate future generations; and either the zeal or greed of the archbishop could have been satisfied with the rich spoils he claimed as a prize. As the gold and silver images and vases were carefully melted down, and those made of less valuable metal were thoughtlessly smashed and thrown into the streets, Theophilus attempted to expose the lies and corrupt practices of the idol's ministers; their skill in manipulating magnetism; their secret ways of using a human actor inside a hollow statue; and their scandalous exploitation of the faith of devout husbands and unsuspecting women. Charges like these might seem credible as they align with the cunning and self-serving nature of superstition. Yet, the same spirit is also likely to engage in the despicable act of insulting and slandering a defeated enemy; and our belief is rightly held in check by the thought that it is much easier to concoct a false story than to maintain a practical fraud. The massive statue of Serapis was caught up in the destruction of his temple and religion. A large number of plates made from different metals were artistically joined to form the majestic figure of the deity, which touched both walls of the sanctuary. The appearance of Serapis, his seated position, and the scepter in his left hand were very similar to typical depictions of Jupiter. He was distinguished from Jupiter by the basket or bushel atop his head and by the symbolic creature he held in his right hand; a serpent's head and body branching into three tails, each ending in the heads of a dog, a lion, and a wolf. It was confidently claimed that if any blasphemous hand dared to violate the majesty of the god, the heavens and the earth would instantly revert to chaos. A fearless soldier, driven by zeal and armed with a hefty battle-axe, climbed the ladder; even the Christian crowd awaited the outcome of the fight with some anxiety. He struck a powerful blow against Serapis's cheek; the cheek fell to the ground, the thunder remained silent, and both the heavens and the earth continued in their usual order and peace. The triumphant soldier continued delivering blows: the massive idol was toppled and shattered; and Serapis's mangled body was dragged disgracefully through the streets of Alexandria. His ruined corpse was burned in the Amphitheatre amid the crowd's cheers; many attributed their conversion to this revelation of their deity's impotence. Popular religions that focus on visible, tangible objects of worship have the advantage of connecting with human senses. However, this advantage is offset by the numerous and unavoidable events that can test the faith of idolaters. It is almost impossible for them to maintain their unwavering reverence for idols or relics, which the naked eye and an unholy hand can hardly distinguish from the most ordinary works of art or nature; and if, in moments of danger, their supposed miraculous virtues do not protect them, they scorn the empty excuses of their priests and justifiably mock the idols and the folly of their superstitious devotion. After the fall of Serapis, the Pagans still held some hope that the Nile would withhold its annual flood from the impious rulers of Egypt; the unusual delay in the inundation seemed to signal the river god's displeasure. However, this delay was soon offset by the rapid rise of the waters. They suddenly surged to such an extraordinary height, bringing comfort to the discontented with the hopeful prospect of a flood, until the tranquil river finally receded to its familiar and fruitful level of sixteen cubits, or about thirty English feet.
The temples of the Roman empire were deserted, or destroyed; but the ingenious superstition of the Pagans still attempted to elude the laws of Theodosius, by which all sacrifices had been severely prohibited. The inhabitants of the country, whose conduct was less opposed to the eye of malicious curiosity, disguised their religious, under the appearance of convivial, meetings. On the days of solemn festivals, they assembled in great numbers under the spreading shade of some consecrated trees; sheep and oxen were slaughtered and roasted; and this rural entertainment was sanctified by the use of incense, and by the hymns which were sung in honor of the gods. But it was alleged, that, as no part of the animal was made a burnt-offering, as no altar was provided to receive the blood, and as the previous oblation of salt cakes, and the concluding ceremony of libations, were carefully omitted, these festal meetings did not involve the guests in the guilt, or penalty, of an illegal sacrifice. Whatever might be the truth of the facts, or the merit of the distinction, these vain pretences were swept away by the last edict of Theodosius, which inflicted a deadly wound on the superstition of the Pagans. This prohibitory law is expressed in the most absolute and comprehensive terms. "It is our will and pleasure," says the emperor, "that none of our subjects, whether magistrates or private citizens, however exalted or however humble may be their rank and condition, shall presume, in any city or in any place, to worship an inanimate idol, by the sacrifice of a guiltless victim." The act of sacrificing, and the practice of divination by the entrails of the victim, are declared (without any regard to the object of the inquiry) a crime of high treason against the state, which can be expiated only by the death of the guilty. The rites of Pagan superstition, which might seem less bloody and atrocious, are abolished, as highly injurious to the truth and honor of religion; luminaries, garlands, frankincense, and libations of wine, are specially enumerated and condemned; and the harmless claims of the domestic genius, of the household gods, are included in this rigorous proscription. The use of any of these profane and illegal ceremonies, subjects the offender to the forfeiture of the house or estate, where they have been performed; and if he has artfully chosen the property of another for the scene of his impiety, he is compelled to discharge, without delay, a heavy fine of twenty-five pounds of gold, or more than one thousand pounds sterling. A fine, not less considerable, is imposed on the connivance of the secret enemies of religion, who shall neglect the duty of their respective stations, either to reveal, or to punish, the guilt of idolatry. Such was the persecuting spirit of the laws of Theodosius, which were repeatedly enforced by his sons and grandsons, with the loud and unanimous applause of the Christian world.
The temples of the Roman Empire were either abandoned or destroyed; however, the clever superstition of the Pagans still tried to get around the laws of Theodosius, which strictly prohibited all sacrifices. The locals, whose actions were less visible to prying eyes, disguised their religious gatherings as party events. On solemn festival days, they gathered in large groups under the spreading shade of sacred trees; sheep and oxen were slaughtered and roasted, and this rustic celebration was marked with the use of incense and hymns sung in honor of the gods. It was claimed that since no part of the animal was offered as a burnt sacrifice, no altar was set up to receive the blood, and the previous offerings of salt cakes and the final ritual of libations were intentionally omitted, these festive gatherings did not implicate the guests in the guilt or punishment of an illegal sacrifice. Regardless of the truth of these claims or the validity of the distinction, these empty pretenses were wiped away by the final edict of Theodosius, which dealt a severe blow to the pagan superstitions. This prohibitory law is stated in the most absolute and inclusive terms. "It is our will and pleasure," the emperor declares, "that none of our subjects, whether magistrates or private citizens, regardless of their rank or social status, shall presume, in any city or place, to worship an inanimate idol by sacrificing a guiltless victim." The act of sacrificing, as well as the practice of divination using the entrails of the sacrificed animal, is deemed (without any consideration of the inquiry's purpose) a high treason against the state, punishable only by death. The rituals of pagan superstition, which might appear less bloody or atrocious, are abolished for being highly damaging to the truth and dignity of religion; offerings like candles, garlands, frankincense, and wine libations are specifically listed and condemned, and even the innocent claims of household spirits and gods fall under this strict prohibition. Using any of these profane and illegal rituals subjects the offender to the loss of the home or property where these acts were performed, and if they've cleverly chosen someone else's property for their offense, they must immediately pay a hefty fine of twenty-five pounds of gold, or over a thousand pounds sterling. A similarly hefty fine is imposed on those secret enemies of religion who neglect their duty to either report or punish the sin of idolatry. Such was the oppressive nature of Theodosius's laws, which were repeatedly enforced by his sons and grandsons, all with the loud and unanimous approval of the Christian community.
Chapter XXVIII: Destruction Of Paganism.—Part III.
In the cruel reigns of Decius and Diocletian, Christianity had been proscribed, as a revolt from the ancient and hereditary religion of the empire; and the unjust suspicions which were entertained of a dark and dangerous faction, were, in some measure, countenanced by the inseparable union and rapid conquests of the Catholic church. But the same excuses of fear and ignorance cannot be applied to the Christian emperors who violated the precepts of humanity and of the Gospel. The experience of ages had betrayed the weakness, as well as folly, of Paganism; the light of reason and of faith had already exposed, to the greatest part of mankind, the vanity of idols; and the declining sect, which still adhered to their worship, might have been permitted to enjoy, in peace and obscurity, the religious costumes of their ancestors. Had the Pagans been animated by the undaunted zeal which possessed the minds of the primitive believers, the triumph of the Church must have been stained with blood; and the martyrs of Jupiter and Apollo might have embraced the glorious opportunity of devoting their lives and fortunes at the foot of their altars. But such obstinate zeal was not congenial to the loose and careless temper of Polytheism. The violent and repeated strokes of the orthodox princes were broken by the soft and yielding substance against which they were directed; and the ready obedience of the Pagans protected them from the pains and penalties of the Theodosian Code. Instead of asserting, that the authority of the gods was superior to that of the emperor, they desisted, with a plaintive murmur, from the use of those sacred rites which their sovereign had condemned. If they were sometimes tempted by a sally of passion, or by the hopes of concealment, to indulge their favorite superstition, their humble repentance disarmed the severity of the Christian magistrate, and they seldom refused to atone for their rashness, by submitting, with some secret reluctance, to the yoke of the Gospel. The churches were filled with the increasing multitude of these unworthy proselytes, who had conformed, from temporal motives, to the reigning religion; and whilst they devoutly imitated the postures, and recited the prayers, of the faithful, they satisfied their conscience by the silent and sincere invocation of the gods of antiquity. If the Pagans wanted patience to suffer they wanted spirit to resist; and the scattered myriads, who deplored the ruin of the temples, yielded, without a contest, to the fortune of their adversaries. The disorderly opposition of the peasants of Syria, and the populace of Alexandria, to the rage of private fanaticism, was silenced by the name and authority of the emperor. The Pagans of the West, without contributing to the elevation of Eugenius, disgraced, by their partial attachment, the cause and character of the usurper. The clergy vehemently exclaimed, that he aggravated the crime of rebellion by the guilt of apostasy; that, by his permission, the altar of victory was again restored; and that the idolatrous symbols of Jupiter and Hercules were displayed in the field, against the invincible standard of the cross. But the vain hopes of the Pagans were soon annihilated by the defeat of Eugenius; and they were left exposed to the resentment of the conqueror, who labored to deserve the favor of Heaven by the extirpation of idolatry.
In the harsh reigns of Decius and Diocletian, Christianity was banned as a rebellion against the ancient and traditional religion of the empire. The unjust fears about a dark and dangerous group were partly supported by the close ties and rapid success of the Catholic Church. However, the same excuses of fear and ignorance cannot be applied to the Christian emperors who broke the rules of humanity and the Gospel. Centuries of experience had revealed the weaknesses, as well as the foolishness, of Paganism; the light of reason and faith had already exposed the emptiness of idols to most people; and the declining sect that still clung to their worship could have been allowed to quietly practice the religious traditions of their ancestors. If the Pagans had been driven by the bold zeal that characterized early believers, the Church's victory would have been marked by bloodshed; the martyrs of Jupiter and Apollo might have bravely sacrificed their lives at their altars. But that kind of stubborn zeal didn't fit well with the lax and indifferent nature of Polytheism. The harsh actions of the orthodox leaders were ineffective against the soft and yielding nature of those they targeted; and the willing obedience of the Pagans shielded them from the penalties of the Theodosian Code. Instead of claiming that the authority of their gods was greater than that of the emperor, they quietly stopped practicing the sacred rites their ruler had banned. When they occasionally gave in to passion or hoped to hide their actions by indulging their beloved superstition, their sincere remorse often softened the punishment from the Christian authorities, and they usually accepted the burden of the Gospel, albeit with some hidden reluctance. The churches became filled with an increasing number of insincere converts who had conformed to the state religion for personal gain; while they dutifully copied the postures and recited the prayers of the faithful, they relieved their consciences with silent and heartfelt appeals to the ancient gods. While the Pagans lacked the patience to endure, they also lacked the spirit to resist; the scattered multitudes lamenting the destruction of the temples surrendered without a fight to the victories of their enemies. The chaotic resistance of the peasants in Syria and the crowds in Alexandria against the fervor of individual fanaticism was silenced by the name and authority of the emperor. The Western Pagans, who did not help raise Eugenius to power, tarnished his cause and character with their half-hearted loyalty. The clergy fervently condemned him for compounding the sin of rebellion with the sin of apostasy, claiming that by allowing it, the altar of victory was restored, and the idols of Jupiter and Hercules were put on display against the unbeatable standard of the cross. But the fleeting hopes of the Pagans were quickly crushed by Eugenius’ defeat, leaving them vulnerable to the anger of the conqueror, who sought to win divine favor by eradicating idolatry.
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master, who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the last extremes of injustice and oppression. Theodosius might undoubtedly have proposed to his Pagan subjects the alternative of baptism or of death; and the eloquent Libanius has praised the moderation of a prince, who never enacted, by any positive law, that all his subjects should immediately embrace and practise the religion of their sovereign. The profession of Christianity was not made an essential qualification for the enjoyment of the civil rights of society, nor were any peculiar hardships imposed on the sectaries, who credulously received the fables of Ovid, and obstinately rejected the miracles of the Gospel. The palace, the schools, the army, and the senate, were filled with declared and devout Pagans; they obtained, without distinction, the civil and military honors of the empire. Theodosius distinguished his liberal regard for virtue and genius by the consular dignity, which he bestowed on Symmachus; and by the personal friendship which he expressed to Libanius; and the two eloquent apologists of Paganism were never required either to change or to dissemble their religious opinions. The Pagans were indulged in the most licentious freedom of speech and writing; the historical and philosophic remains of Eunapius, Zosimus, and the fanatic teachers of the school of Plato, betray the most furious animosity, and contain the sharpest invectives, against the sentiments and conduct of their victorious adversaries. If these audacious libels were publicly known, we must applaud the good sense of the Christian princes, who viewed, with a smile of contempt, the last struggles of superstition and despair. But the Imperial laws, which prohibited the sacrifices and ceremonies of Paganism, were rigidly executed; and every hour contributed to destroy the influence of a religion, which was supported by custom, rather than by argument. The devotion or the poet, or the philosopher, may be secretly nourished by prayer, meditation, and study; but the exercise of public worship appears to be the only solid foundation of the religious sentiments of the people, which derive their force from imitation and habit. The interruption of that public exercise may consummate, in the period of a few years, the important work of a national revolution. The memory of theological opinions cannot long be preserved, without the artificial helps of priests, of temples, and of books. The ignorant vulgar, whose minds are still agitated by the blind hopes and terrors of superstition, will be soon persuaded by their superiors to direct their vows to the reigning deities of the age; and will insensibly imbibe an ardent zeal for the support and propagation of the new doctrine, which spiritual hunger at first compelled them to accept. The generation that arose in the world after the promulgation of the Imperial laws, was attracted within the pale of the Catholic church: and so rapid, yet so gentle, was the fall of Paganism, that only twenty-eight years after the death of Theodosius, the faint and minute vestiges were no longer visible to the eye of the legislator.
A nation of slaves is always ready to praise the mercy of their master, who, despite having absolute power, chooses not to go to the extreme with injustice and oppression. Theodosius could have certainly given his Pagan subjects the choice of baptism or death; and the eloquent Libanius praised the restraint of a prince who never established a law requiring all his subjects to immediately adopt and practice the religion of their ruler. Following Christianity was not made a necessary condition for enjoying civil rights, nor were any special hardships placed on those who naïvely embraced the myths of Ovid while stubbornly rejecting the miracles of the Gospel. The palace, schools, army, and senate were filled with openly devoted Pagans; they received, without distinction, the civil and military honors of the empire. Theodosius showed his appreciation for virtue and talent by granting the consular title to Symmachus and by expressing personal friendship to Libanius; the two eloquent defenders of Paganism were never asked to change or hide their religious beliefs. Pagans enjoyed a great deal of freedom in speech and writing; the historical and philosophical works of Eunapius, Zosimus, and the passionate teachers of the Platonic school reveal fierce hostility and contain sharp attacks against the ideas and actions of their triumphant opponents. If these bold criticisms were publicly known, we would have to commend the common sense of the Christian leaders, who looked down with contempt on the last remnants of superstition and despair. However, the Imperial laws that banned the sacrifices and rituals of Paganism were strictly enforced, and every moment contributed to diminishing the influence of a religion upheld more by tradition than by reason. The devotion of a poet or philosopher may be quietly nurtured through prayer, meditation, and study, but public worship seems to be the only solid foundation for the religious feelings of the people, fueled by imitation and habit. Interrupting that public practice can complete, in just a few years, a significant national change. The memory of theological beliefs cannot be maintained for long without the structured support of priests, temples, and texts. The uneducated masses, whose minds are still stirred by the blind hopes and fears of superstition, will quickly be influenced by their leaders to direct their prayers toward the reigning deities of the time and will gradually adopt a passionate dedication to supporting and spreading the new doctrine they were initially compelled to accept due to spiritual hunger. The generation that emerged after the introduction of the Imperial laws was brought into the fold of the Catholic church: and the decline of Paganism was so quick yet so gentle that only twenty-eight years after Theodosius's death, its faint and insignificant traces were no longer visible to lawmakers.
The ruin of the Pagan religion is described by the sophists as a dreadful and amazing prodigy, which covered the earth with darkness, and restored the ancient dominion of chaos and of night. They relate, in solemn and pathetic strains, that the temples were converted into sepulchres, and that the holy places, which had been adorned by the statues of the gods, were basely polluted by the relics of Christian martyrs. "The monks" (a race of filthy animals, to whom Eunapius is tempted to refuse the name of men) "are the authors of the new worship, which, in the place of those deities who are conceived by the understanding, has substituted the meanest and most contemptible slaves. The heads, salted and pickled, of those infamous malefactors, who for the multitude of their crimes have suffered a just and ignominious death; their bodies still marked by the impression of the lash, and the scars of those tortures which were inflicted by the sentence of the magistrate; such" (continues Eunapius) "are the gods which the earth produces in our days; such are the martyrs, the supreme arbitrators of our prayers and petitions to the Deity, whose tombs are now consecrated as the objects of the veneration of the people." Without approving the malice, it is natural enough to share the surprise of the sophist, the spectator of a revolution, which raised those obscure victims of the laws of Rome to the rank of celestial and invisible protectors of the Roman empire. The grateful respect of the Christians for the martyrs of the faith, was exalted, by time and victory, into religious adoration; and the most illustrious of the saints and prophets were deservedly associated to the honors of the martyrs. One hundred and fifty years after the glorious deaths of St. Peter and St. Paul, the Vatican and the Ostian road were distinguished by the tombs, or rather by the trophies, of those spiritual heroes. In the age which followed the conversion of Constantine, the emperors, the consuls, and the generals of armies, devoutly visited the sepulchres of a tentmaker and a fisherman; and their venerable bones were deposited under the altars of Christ, on which the bishops of the royal city continually offered the unbloody sacrifice. The new capital of the Eastern world, unable to produce any ancient and domestic trophies, was enriched by the spoils of dependent provinces. The bodies of St. Andrew, St. Luke, and St. Timothy, had reposed near three hundred years in the obscure graves, from whence they were transported, in solemn pomp, to the church of the apostles, which the magnificence of Constantine had founded on the banks of the Thracian Bosphorus. About fifty years afterwards, the same banks were honored by the presence of Samuel, the judge and prophet of the people of Israel. His ashes, deposited in a golden vase, and covered with a silken veil, were delivered by the bishops into each other's hands. The relics of Samuel were received by the people with the same joy and reverence which they would have shown to the living prophet; the highways, from Palestine to the gates of Constantinople, were filled with an uninterrupted procession; and the emperor Arcadius himself, at the head of the most illustrious members of the clergy and senate, advanced to meet his extraordinary guest, who had always deserved and claimed the homage of kings. The example of Rome and Constantinople confirmed the faith and discipline of the Catholic world. The honors of the saints and martyrs, after a feeble and ineffectual murmur of profane reason, were universally established; and in the age of Ambrose and Jerom, something was still deemed wanting to the sanctity of a Christian church, till it had been consecrated by some portion of holy relics, which fixed and inflamed the devotion of the faithful.
The downfall of the Pagan religion is portrayed by the sophists as a terrifying and astonishing event that plunged the world into darkness, reestablishing chaos and night. They solemnly and movingly describe how temples became tombs, and sacred spaces that once showcased the statues of gods were shamefully desecrated by the remains of Christian martyrs. "The monks" (a filthy bunch, whom Eunapius is tempted to deny the title of humans) "are the creators of this new worship, which replaces the divine beings understood by the mind with the most lowly and despicable servants. The heads, salted and pickled, of those infamous criminals, who suffered just and shameful deaths for their many crimes; their bodies still bearing the marks of the lash and the scars from tortures inflicted by the magistrate's orders; such" (Eunapius continues) "are the gods produced by the earth in our time; such are the martyrs, the ultimate judges of our prayers and appeals to the Deity, whose graves are now revered by the people." Without endorsing the malice, it’s understandable to share the astonishment of the sophist, a witness to the revolution that elevated those obscure victims of Roman law to the status of celestial and invisible protectors of the Roman Empire. The grateful respect of Christians for the martyrs of the faith was, over time and through victory, raised to religious adoration; and the most renowned saints and prophets were rightfully honored alongside the martyrs. One hundred and fifty years after the glorious deaths of St. Peter and St. Paul, the Vatican and the Ostian road were marked by the tombs, or rather the trophies, of those spiritual heroes. In the period following Constantine's conversion, emperors, consuls, and military generals reverently visited the graves of a tentmaker and a fisherman; and their revered bones were placed beneath Christ’s altars, where the bishops of the royal city continually offered the unbloody sacrifice. The new capital of the Eastern world, unable to produce any ancient and local trophies, was enriched with the spoils of its provinces. The bodies of St. Andrew, St. Luke, and St. Timothy had rested for nearly three hundred years in unremarkable graves before being ceremoniously transported to the Church of the Apostles, which Constantine had magnificently built along the banks of the Thracian Bosphorus. About fifty years later, the same banks were graced by the presence of Samuel, the judge and prophet of the people of Israel. His ashes, placed in a golden vase and veiled in silk, were handed from bishop to bishop. The people received Samuel’s relics with the same joy and reverence they would have shown the living prophet; the roads from Palestine to the gates of Constantinople were filled with a continuous procession; and Emperor Arcadius, leading the most distinguished members of the clergy and senate, went out to greet his extraordinary guest, who had always warranted and claimed the respect of kings. The examples of Rome and Constantinople solidified the faith and discipline of the Catholic world. The honors given to the saints and martyrs, after a weak and ineffective protest from secular reason, became universally accepted; and in the time of Ambrose and Jerome, something still seemed lacking in the sanctity of a Christian church until it had been consecrated by a piece of holy relics, which anchored and ignited the devotion of the faithful.
In the long period of twelve hundred years, which elapsed between the reign of Constantine and the reformation of Luther, the worship of saints and relics corrupted the pure and perfect simplicity of the Christian model: and some symptoms of degeneracy may be observed even in the first generations which adopted and cherished this pernicious innovation.
In the long span of twelve hundred years between the reign of Constantine and Luther's Reformation, the worship of saints and relics distorted the clear and simple nature of the Christian model. Signs of decline can be seen even in the earliest generations that accepted and valued this harmful change.
I. The satisfactory experience, that the relics of saints were more valuable than gold or precious stones, stimulated the clergy to multiply the treasures of the church. Without much regard for truth or probability, they invented names for skeletons, and actions for names. The fame of the apostles, and of the holy men who had imitated their virtues, was darkened by religious fiction. To the invincible band of genuine and primitive martyrs, they added myriads of imaginary heroes, who had never existed, except in the fancy of crafty or credulous legendaries; and there is reason to suspect, that Tours might not be the only diocese in which the bones of a malefactor were adored, instead of those of a saint. A superstitious practice, which tended to increase the temptations of fraud, and credulity, insensibly extinguished the light of history, and of reason, in the Christian world.
I. The satisfying experience that the relics of saints were more valuable than gold or jewels encouraged the clergy to increase the church's treasures. Without much regard for truth or plausibility, they created names for skeletons and stories for those names. The reputation of the apostles and the holy figures who emulated their virtues was overshadowed by religious fiction. Alongside the genuine and early martyrs, they added countless imaginary heroes who never existed outside the imaginations of clever or gullible storytellers; and there’s reason to believe that Tours wasn’t the only diocese where the bones of a criminal were worshipped instead of those of a saint. This superstitious practice, which only fueled the temptations of deceit and gullibility, gradually diminished the light of history and reason in the Christian world.
II. But the progress of superstition would have been much less rapid and victorious, if the faith of the people had not been assisted by the seasonable aid of visions and miracles, to ascertain the authenticity and virtue of the most suspicious relics. In the reign of the younger Theodosius, Lucian, a presbyter of Jerusalem, and the ecclesiastical minister of the village of Caphargamala, about twenty miles from the city, related a very singular dream, which, to remove his doubts, had been repeated on three successive Saturdays. A venerable figure stood before him, in the silence of the night, with a long beard, a white robe, and a gold rod; announced himself by the name of Gamaliel, and revealed to the astonished presbyter, that his own corpse, with the bodies of his son Abibas, his friend Nicodemus, and the illustrious Stephen, the first martyr of the Christian faith, were secretly buried in the adjacent field. He added, with some impatience, that it was time to release himself and his companions from their obscure prison; that their appearance would be salutary to a distressed world; and that they had made choice of Lucian to inform the bishop of Jerusalem of their situation and their wishes. The doubts and difficulties which still retarded this important discovery were successively removed by new visions; and the ground was opened by the bishop, in the presence of an innumerable multitude. The coffins of Gamaliel, of his son, and of his friend, were found in regular order; but when the fourth coffin, which contained the remains of Stephen, was shown to the light, the earth trembled, and an odor, such as that of paradise, was smelt, which instantly cured the various diseases of seventy-three of the assistants. The companions of Stephen were left in their peaceful residence of Caphargamala: but the relics of the first martyr were transported, in solemn procession, to a church constructed in their honor on Mount Sion; and the minute particles of those relics, a drop of blood, or the scrapings of a bone, were acknowledged, in almost every province of the Roman world, to possess a divine and miraculous virtue. The grave and learned Augustin, whose understanding scarcely admits the excuse of credulity, has attested the innumerable prodigies which were performed in Africa by the relics of St. Stephen; and this marvellous narrative is inserted in the elaborate work of the City of God, which the bishop of Hippo designed as a solid and immortal proof of the truth of Christianity. Augustin solemnly declares, that he has selected those miracles only which were publicly certified by the persons who were either the objects, or the spectators, of the power of the martyr. Many prodigies were omitted, or forgotten; and Hippo had been less favorably treated than the other cities of the province. And yet the bishop enumerates above seventy miracles, of which three were resurrections from the dead, in the space of two years, and within the limits of his own diocese. If we enlarge our view to all the dioceses, and all the saints, of the Christian world, it will not be easy to calculate the fables, and the errors, which issued from this inexhaustible source. But we may surely be allowed to observe, that a miracle, in that age of superstition and credulity, lost its name and its merit, since it could scarcely be considered as a deviation from the ordinary and established laws of nature.
II. The spread of superstition would have been much slower and less triumphant if the people's faith hadn't been bolstered by timely visions and miracles, which helped verify the authenticity and significance of the most questionable relics. During the reign of the younger Theodosius, Lucian, a presbyter from Jerusalem and the church leader of the village of Caphargamala, about twenty miles from the city, shared a very unusual dream that occurred three Saturdays in a row to ease his doubts. A venerable figure appeared before him in the stillness of the night, with a long beard, a white robe, and a golden rod; he identified himself as Gamaliel and revealed to the astonished presbyter that his own body, along with the bodies of his son Abibas, his friend Nicodemus, and the renowned Stephen, the first martyr of the Christian faith, were secretly buried in the nearby field. He added, somewhat impatiently, that it was time for him and his companions to be freed from their hidden prison; that their appearance would benefit a troubled world; and that they had chosen Lucian to inform the bishop of Jerusalem about their situation and desires. The doubts and challenges that were still holding back this significant discovery were gradually resolved through new visions, leading to the ground being opened by the bishop in front of an immense crowd. The coffins of Gamaliel, his son, and his friend were found in proper order; but when the fourth coffin, which contained the remains of Stephen, was revealed, the earth shook, and a fragrance reminiscent of paradise was sensed, which instantly healed the various ailments of seventy-three attendees. Stephen's companions remained in their quiet home of Caphargamala, but the relics of the first martyr were solemnly carried in a procession to a church built in their honor on Mount Sion; and tiny pieces of those relics, like a drop of blood or bits of bone, were recognized in nearly every province of the Roman world as having divine and miraculous power. The serious and learned Augustine, whose intellect hardly allows for the excuse of gullibility, has confirmed the countless wonders performed in Africa by the relics of St. Stephen; and this extraordinary account is included in the comprehensive work City of God, which the bishop of Hippo intended as a solid and lasting proof of the truth of Christianity. Augustine firmly states that he has chosen only those miracles that were publicly verified by individuals who experienced or witnessed the power of the martyr. Many wonders were left out or forgotten, and Hippo was not as favorably regarded as other cities in the province. Yet, the bishop lists over seventy miracles, including three resurrections from the dead, within just two years, and within his own diocese. If we broaden our view to encompass all dioceses and all saints of the Christian world, it becomes challenging to tally the myths and errors that originated from this endless source. However, we can certainly note that a miracle, in that age of superstition and gullibility, lost its significance and value, as it could hardly be seen as a break from the usual and established laws of nature.
III. The innumerable miracles, of which the tombs of the martyrs were the perpetual theatre, revealed to the pious believer the actual state and constitution of the invisible world; and his religious speculations appeared to be founded on the firm basis of fact and experience. Whatever might be the condition of vulgar souls, in the long interval between the dissolution and the resurrection of their bodies, it was evident that the superior spirits of the saints and martyrs did not consume that portion of their existence in silent and inglorious sleep. It was evident (without presuming to determine the place of their habitation, or the nature of their felicity) that they enjoyed the lively and active consciousness of their happiness, their virtue, and their powers; and that they had already secured the possession of their eternal reward. The enlargement of their intellectual faculties surpassed the measure of the human imagination; since it was proved by experience, that they were capable of hearing and understanding the various petitions of their numerous votaries; who, in the same moment of time, but in the most distant parts of the world, invoked the name and assistance of Stephen or of Martin. The confidence of their petitioners was founded on the persuasion, that the saints, who reigned with Christ, cast an eye of pity upon earth; that they were warmly interested in the prosperity of the Catholic Church; and that the individuals, who imitated the example of their faith and piety, were the peculiar and favorite objects of their most tender regard. Sometimes, indeed, their friendship might be influenced by considerations of a less exalted kind: they viewed with partial affection the places which had been consecrated by their birth, their residence, their death, their burial, or the possession of their relics. The meaner passions of pride, avarice, and revenge, may be deemed unworthy of a celestial breast; yet the saints themselves condescended to testify their grateful approbation of the liberality of their votaries; and the sharpest bolts of punishment were hurled against those impious wretches, who violated their magnificent shrines, or disbelieved their supernatural power. Atrocious, indeed, must have been the guilt, and strange would have been the scepticism, of those men, if they had obstinately resisted the proofs of a divine agency, which the elements, the whole range of the animal creation, and even the subtle and invisible operations of the human mind, were compelled to obey. The immediate, and almost instantaneous, effects that were supposed to follow the prayer, or the offence, satisfied the Christians of the ample measure of favor and authority which the saints enjoyed in the presence of the Supreme God; and it seemed almost superfluous to inquire whether they were continually obliged to intercede before the throne of grace; or whether they might not be permitted to exercise, according to the dictates of their benevolence and justice, the delegated powers of their subordinate ministry. The imagination, which had been raised by a painful effort to the contemplation and worship of the Universal Cause, eagerly embraced such inferior objects of adoration as were more proportioned to its gross conceptions and imperfect faculties. The sublime and simple theology of the primitive Christians was gradually corrupted; and the Monarchy of heaven, already clouded by metaphysical subtleties, was degraded by the introduction of a popular mythology, which tended to restore the reign of polytheism.
III. The countless miracles, which the tombs of the martyrs continually showcased, revealed to the faithful believer the actual state and structure of the invisible world; and their religious beliefs seemed to be based on solid facts and experiences. No matter what condition ordinary souls faced in the long gap between the decay and resurrection of their bodies, it was clear that the superior spirits of the saints and martyrs didn’t spend that time in silent and unremarkable sleep. It was evident (without assuming to determine where they lived or the nature of their happiness) that they experienced an active awareness of their joy, virtue, and abilities; and that they had already secured their eternal reward. Their intellectual faculties expanded beyond human imagination; as shown by the fact that they could hear and understand the many requests of their countless worshippers, who, simultaneously from the most distant corners of the world, called upon the names and assistance of Stephen or Martin. The confidence of their petitioners stemmed from the belief that the saints, who reigned with Christ, looked down with compassion upon Earth; that they cared deeply about the well-being of the Catholic Church; and that those who followed their examples of faith and piety were especially cherished in their hearts. Sometimes, their affection might be influenced by less noble reasons: they had a personal attachment to the places where they were born, lived, died, or were buried, or where their relics were held. While the lower passions of pride, greed, and revenge might seem unworthy of celestial beings, the saints themselves acknowledged the generosity of their followers; and the harshest punishments were directed at those impious individuals who desecrated their magnificent shrines or doubted their supernatural abilities. The guilt would indeed have to be severe, and the skepticism strange, for those people to stubbornly reject the undeniable signs of divine influence that nature, the entire animal kingdom, and even the intricate workings of the human mind were compelled to obey. The immediate and almost instantaneous results believed to follow from prayer or wrongdoing convinced Christians of the substantial favor and authority the saints had with the Supreme God; and it seemed almost unnecessary to inquire whether they had to constantly intercede at the throne of grace, or whether they could exercise their delegated powers of ministry based on their benevolence and justice. The imagination, once painfully raised to contemplate and worship the Universal Cause, eagerly accepted these lesser objects of worship that were more suited to its crude understanding and limited abilities. The profound and simple theology of the early Christians gradually became corrupted; and the monarchy of heaven, already obscured by metaphysical complexities, was diminished by the introduction of a popular mythology, which tended to revive the reign of polytheism.
IV. As the objects of religion were gradually reduced to the standard of the imagination, the rites and ceremonies were introduced that seemed most powerfully to affect the senses of the vulgar. If, in the beginning of the fifth century, Tertullian, or Lactantius, had been suddenly raised from the dead, to assist at the festival of some popular saint, or martyr, they would have gazed with astonishment, and indignation, on the profane spectacle, which had succeeded to the pure and spiritual worship of a Christian congregation. As soon as the doors of the church were thrown open, they must have been offended by the smoke of incense, the perfume of flowers, and the glare of lamps and tapers, which diffused, at noonday, a gaudy, superfluous, and, in their opinion, a sacrilegious light. If they approached the balustrade of the altar, they made their way through the prostrate crowd, consisting, for the most part, of strangers and pilgrims, who resorted to the city on the vigil of the feast; and who already felt the strong intoxication of fanaticism, and, perhaps, of wine. Their devout kisses were imprinted on the walls and pavement of the sacred edifice; and their fervent prayers were directed, whatever might be the language of their church, to the bones, the blood, or the ashes of the saint, which were usually concealed, by a linen or silken veil, from the eyes of the vulgar. The Christians frequented the tombs of the martyrs, in the hope of obtaining, from their powerful intercession, every sort of spiritual, but more especially of temporal, blessings. They implored the preservation of their health, or the cure of their infirmities; the fruitfulness of their barren wives, or the safety and happiness of their children. Whenever they undertook any distant or dangerous journey, they requested, that the holy martyrs would be their guides and protectors on the road; and if they returned without having experienced any misfortune, they again hastened to the tombs of the martyrs, to celebrate, with grateful thanksgivings, their obligations to the memory and relics of those heavenly patrons. The walls were hung round with symbols of the favors which they had received; eyes, and hands, and feet, of gold and silver: and edifying pictures, which could not long escape the abuse of indiscreet or idolatrous devotion, represented the image, the attributes, and the miracles of the tutelar saint. The same uniform original spirit of superstition might suggest, in the most distant ages and countries, the same methods of deceiving the credulity, and of affecting the senses of mankind: but it must ingenuously be confessed, that the ministers of the Catholic church imitated the profane model, which they were impatient to destroy. The most respectable bishops had persuaded themselves that the ignorant rustics would more cheerfully renounce the superstitions of Paganism, if they found some resemblance, some compensation, in the bosom of Christianity. The religion of Constantine achieved, in less than a century, the final conquest of the Roman empire: but the victors themselves were insensibly subdued by the arts of their vanquished rivals.
IV. As the focus of religion gradually shifted to align more with imagination, rituals and ceremonies emerged that seemed to influence the senses of everyday people the most. If, in the early fifth century, Tertullian or Lactantius were suddenly brought back to life to witness the celebration of a popular saint or martyr, they would have looked on in shock and anger at the profane spectacle that replaced the pure and spiritual worship of a Christian congregation. As soon as the church doors were opened, they would have been offended by the smoke of incense, the scent of flowers, and the bright lights from lamps and candles that cast a gaudy and excessive light during the day, which they would consider sacrilegious. If they approached the altar, they would have had to navigate through a crowd mostly made up of strangers and pilgrims who flocked to the city for the feast, already feeling the intoxicating effects of fanaticism and possibly wine. Their devoted kisses left marks on the walls and floors of the holy place, and their fervent prayers were aimed, regardless of their church's language, at the bones, blood, or ashes of the saint, usually hidden from the sight of the uninitiated by a linen or silk veil. The Christians visited the graves of the martyrs, hoping to receive various spiritual, but especially material, blessings through their powerful intercession. They sought healing for their illnesses, fertility for their barren wives, or the safety and happiness of their children. Whenever they set out on a long or perilous journey, they asked the holy martyrs to guide and protect them along the way; and if they returned without incident, they hurried back to the martyrs' graves to express their gratitude with thanksgivings, acknowledging their debts to the memory and relics of those heavenly patrons. The walls were adorned with symbols of the favors they had received—gold and silver eyes, hands, and feet—and inspiring pictures that could easily fall into the traps of indiscreet or idolatrous devotion, showing the likeness, qualities, and miracles of the guardian saint. The same underlying spirit of superstition could arise in the most distant ages and places, using the same tactics to exploit human gullibility and appeal to the senses: yet it must be admitted that the leaders of the Catholic church emulated the very profane model they were eager to dismantle. Respected bishops believed that uninformed peasants would be more willing to abandon the superstitions of Paganism if they found some similarities or compensation within Christianity. The religion of Constantine achieved, in less than a century, the ultimate victory over the Roman Empire: but the victors themselves were gradually overcome by the techniques of their conquered rivals.
Chapter XXIX: Division Of Roman Empire Between Sons Of Theodosius.—Part I.
Final Division Of The Roman Empire Between The Sons Of Theodosius.—Reign Of Arcadius And Honorius— Administration Of Rufinus And Stilicho.—Revolt And Defeat Of Gildo In Africa.
Final Division Of The Roman Empire Between The Sons Of Theodosius.—Reign Of Arcadius And Honorius— Administration Of Rufinus And Stilicho.—Revolt And Defeat Of Gildo In Africa.
The genius of Rome expired with Theodosius; the last of the successors of Augustus and Constantine, who appeared in the field at the head of their armies, and whose authority was universally acknowledged throughout the whole extent of the empire. The memory of his virtues still continued, however, to protect the feeble and inexperienced youth of his two sons. After the death of their father, Arcadius and Honorius were saluted, by the unanimous consent of mankind, as the lawful emperors of the East, and of the West; and the oath of fidelity was eagerly taken by every order of the state; the senates of old and new Rome, the clergy, the magistrates, the soldiers, and the people. Arcadius, who was then about eighteen years of age, was born in Spain, in the humble habitation of a private family. But he received a princely education in the palace of Constantinople; and his inglorious life was spent in that peaceful and splendid seat of royalty, from whence he appeared to reign over the provinces of Thrace, Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt, from the Lower Danube to the confines of Persia and Æthiopia. His younger brother Honorius, assumed, in the eleventh year of his age, the nominal government of Italy, Africa, Gaul, Spain, and Britain; and the troops, which guarded the frontiers of his kingdom, were opposed, on one side, to the Caledonians, and on the other, to the Moors. The great and martial præfecture of Illyricum was divided between the two princes: the defence and possession of the provinces of Noricum, Pannonia, and Dalmatia still belonged to the Western empire; but the two large dioceses of Dacia and Macedonia, which Gratian had intrusted to the valor of Theodosius, were forever united to the empire of the East. The boundary in Europe was not very different from the line which now separates the Germans and the Turks; and the respective advantages of territory, riches, populousness, and military strength, were fairly balanced and compensated, in this final and permanent division of the Roman empire. The hereditary sceptre of the sons of Theodosius appeared to be the gift of nature, and of their father; the generals and ministers had been accustomed to adore the majesty of the royal infants; and the army and people were not admonished of their rights, and of their power, by the dangerous example of a recent election. The gradual discovery of the weakness of Arcadius and Honorius, and the repeated calamities of their reign, were not sufficient to obliterate the deep and early impressions of loyalty. The subjects of Rome, who still reverenced the persons, or rather the names, of their sovereigns, beheld, with equal abhorrence, the rebels who opposed, and the ministers who abused, the authority of the throne.
The greatness of Rome ended with Theodosius, the last of the leaders following Augustus and Constantine, who led their armies and whose authority was widely recognized across the entire empire. However, the memory of his virtues continued to support the weak and inexperienced youth of his two sons. After their father's death, Arcadius and Honorius were unanimously recognized as the legitimate emperors of the East and the West, and people from all walks of life eagerly pledged their loyalty—senators from both old and new Rome, clergy, magistrates, soldiers, and the public. Arcadius, who was about eighteen at the time, was born in Spain to a humble family but received a royal education in the palace of Constantinople. He spent his unremarkable life in that peaceful and lavish seat of power, from which he seemed to rule over the provinces of Thrace, Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt, stretching from the Lower Danube to the borders of Persia and Ethiopia. His younger brother Honorius took on the nominal rule of Italy, Africa, Gaul, Spain, and Britain when he was just eleven. The troops guarding his realm faced the Caledonians on one side and the Moors on the other. The significant and military prefecture of Illyricum was shared between the two brothers: the Western Empire maintained control over the provinces of Noricum, Pannonia, and Dalmatia, while the major dioceses of Dacia and Macedonia, entrusted to the courage of Theodosius by Gratian, remained permanently part of the Eastern Empire. The boundary in Europe was not much different from the line that now separates Germans from Turks, and the respective advantages in territory, wealth, population, and military strength were fairly balanced in this final and lasting division of the Roman Empire. The inherited rule of Theodosius's sons seemed like a natural gift from both nature and their father; generals and officials were used to respecting the authority of the young rulers, and the army and people were not reminded of their rights and power by the risky example of a recent election. The gradual realization of Arcadius and Honorius's weaknesses and the repeated troubles of their reign were not enough to erase the deep and early feelings of loyalty. The subjects of Rome, who still held their leaders—if not the actual individuals, at least their names—in high regard, looked at both the rebels who opposed and the officials who misused the throne's authority with equal disdain.
Theodosius had tarnished the glory of his reign by the elevation of Rufinus; an odious favorite, who, in an age of civil and religious faction, has deserved, from every party, the imputation of every crime. The strong impulse of ambition and avarice had urged Rufinus to abandon his native country, an obscure corner of Gaul, to advance his fortune in the capital of the East: the talent of bold and ready elocution, qualified him to succeed in the lucrative profession of the law; and his success in that profession was a regular step to the most honorable and important employments of the state. He was raised, by just degrees, to the station of master of the offices. In the exercise of his various functions, so essentially connected with the whole system of civil government, he acquired the confidence of a monarch, who soon discovered his diligence and capacity in business, and who long remained ignorant of the pride, the malice, and the covetousness of his disposition. These vices were concealed beneath the mask of profound dissimulation; his passions were subservient only to the passions of his master; yet in the horrid massacre of Thessalonica, the cruel Rufinus inflamed the fury, without imitating the repentance, of Theodosius. The minister, who viewed with proud indifference the rest of mankind, never forgave the appearance of an injury; and his personal enemies had forfeited, in his opinion, the merit of all public services. Promotus, the master-general of the infantry, had saved the empire from the invasion of the Ostrogoths; but he indignantly supported the preeminence of a rival, whose character and profession he despised; and in the midst of a public council, the impatient soldier was provoked to chastise with a blow the indecent pride of the favorite. This act of violence was represented to the emperor as an insult, which it was incumbent on his dignity to resent. The disgrace and exile of Promotus were signified by a peremptory order, to repair, without delay, to a military station on the banks of the Danube; and the death of that general (though he was slain in a skirmish with the Barbarians) was imputed to the perfidious arts of Rufinus. The sacrifice of a hero gratified his revenge; the honors of the consulship elated his vanity; but his power was still imperfect and precarious, as long as the important posts of præfect of the East, and of præfect of Constantinople, were filled by Tatian, and his son Proculus; whose united authority balanced, for some time, the ambition and favor of the master of the offices. The two præfects were accused of rapine and corruption in the administration of the laws and finances. For the trial of these illustrious offenders, the emperor constituted a special commission: several judges were named to share the guilt and reproach of injustice; but the right of pronouncing sentence was reserved to the president alone, and that president was Rufinus himself. The father, stripped of the præfecture of the East, was thrown into a dungeon; but the son, conscious that few ministers can be found innocent, where an enemy is their judge, had secretly escaped; and Rufinus must have been satisfied with the least obnoxious victim, if despotism had not condescended to employ the basest and most ungenerous artifice. The prosecution was conducted with an appearance of equity and moderation, which flattered Tatian with the hope of a favorable event: his confidence was fortified by the solemn assurances, and perfidious oaths, of the president, who presumed to interpose the sacred name of Theodosius himself; and the unhappy father was at last persuaded to recall, by a private letter, the fugitive Proculus. He was instantly seized, examined, condemned, and beheaded, in one of the suburbs of Constantinople, with a precipitation which disappointed the clemency of the emperor. Without respecting the misfortunes of a consular senator, the cruel judges of Tatian compelled him to behold the execution of his son: the fatal cord was fastened round his own neck; but in the moment when he expected and perhaps desired, the relief of a speedy death, he was permitted to consume the miserable remnant of his old age in poverty and exile. The punishment of the two præfects might, perhaps, be excused by the exceptionable parts of their own conduct; the enmity of Rufinus might be palliated by the jealous and unsociable nature of ambition. But he indulged a spirit of revenge equally repugnant to prudence and to justice, when he degraded their native country of Lycia from the rank of Roman provinces; stigmatized a guiltless people with a mark of ignominy; and declared, that the countrymen of Tatian and Proculus should forever remain incapable of holding any employment of honor or advantage under the Imperial government. The new præfect of the East (for Rufinus instantly succeeded to the vacant honors of his adversary) was not diverted, however, by the most criminal pursuits, from the performance of the religious duties, which in that age were considered as the most essential to salvation. In the suburb of Chalcedon, surnamed the Oak, he had built a magnificent villa; to which he devoutly added a stately church, consecrated to the apostles St. Peter and St. Paul, and continually sanctified by the prayers and penance of a regular society of monks. A numerous, and almost general, synod of the bishops of the Eastern empire, was summoned to celebrate, at the same time, the dedication of the church, and the baptism of the founder. This double ceremony was performed with extraordinary pomp; and when Rufinus was purified, in the holy font, from all the sins that he had hitherto committed, a venerable hermit of Egypt rashly proposed himself as the sponsor of a proud and ambitious statesman.
Theodosius had tarnished the glory of his reign by promoting Rufinus, a disliked favorite who, in a time of civil and religious strife, had earned every party's scorn for various crimes. Driven by ambition and greed, Rufinus left his modest hometown in Gaul to seek his fortune in the Eastern capital. His impressive speaking skills helped him succeed in the profitable field of law, which was a stepping stone to the most honorable and significant positions in the government. He gradually rose to the position of master of the offices. Through his various roles, directly tied to the entire civil government, he gained the king's trust, who soon recognized Rufinus's diligence and capability in his work but remained unaware of his pride, malice, and greed. These flaws were hidden behind a facade of deep deceit; his passions served only to please his master. However, during the brutal massacre at Thessalonica, the ruthless Rufinus fueled the rage without sharing in Theodosius's remorse. Rufinus, who looked down on everyone else, never forgave any perceived slight, believing that his personal enemies had forfeited all public service merits. Promotus, the master-general of the infantry, had saved the empire from the Ostrogoth invasion, but he scorned Rufinus's superiority, leading to an outburst where he struck the favorite in a public council. This act of violence was reported to the emperor as an insult that he had to respond to in order to preserve his dignity. Promotus was disgraced and exiled with a stern order to report immediately to a military post by the Danube, and although he died in a skirmish with the Barbarians, Rufinus was blamed for his downfall through treachery. The death of a hero satisfied Rufinus's thirst for revenge; the consulship he obtained boosted his ego, but his power remained shaky as long as Tatian and his son Proculus held the key positions of prefect of the East and prefect of Constantinople, whose combined authority temporarily restrained Rufinus’s ambition and influence. The two prefects faced allegations of corruption and malpractice in law and finance. For their trial, the emperor set up a special commission: several judges were appointed to share in the blame for any injustice, but only the president, Rufinus himself, had the final say. The father lost his prefecture and was imprisoned, while the son, aware that few ministers escape unscathed when accused by an enemy, fled secretly; Rufinus must have been satisfied with the least controversial target if he hadn’t resorted to the most despicable tactics. The prosecution was presented under the guise of fairness and restraint, which gave Tatian false hope for a good outcome; his confidence was bolstered by the solemn promises and deceitful oaths of the president, who even invoked the sacred name of Theodosius. Tragically, the distressed father was eventually convinced to send a private letter recalling the fleeing Proculus. Proculus was captured immediately, interrogated, condemned, and beheaded rapidly in a suburban area of Constantinople, much to the surprise of the emperor's mercy. In a heartless act, Tatian's cruel judges forced the father to witness his son's execution; a noose was fastened around his own neck, but just when he expected or perhaps hoped for a quick death, he was left to suffer the rest of his old age in poverty and exile. The punishment of the two prefects might be justified given their questionable conduct; Rufinus's enmity could be excused by his ambitious and unsociable nature. However, his vengeful actions were equally against wisdom and justice when he demoted their homeland of Lycia from a Roman province, branding an innocent people with disgrace and declaring that Tatian and Proculus's fellow countrymen would forever be barred from holding any honorable positions in the Imperial government. The new prefect of the East (as Rufinus immediately took over the vacant position of his rival) was not distracted by the most immoral pursuits from fulfilling the religious duties considered essential for salvation at that time. In the suburb of Chalcedon, nicknamed the Oak, he built a grand villa, to which he devotionally added a magnificent church dedicated to the apostles St. Peter and St. Paul, continually blessed by the prayers and penance of a regular group of monks. A large and almost universal synod of bishops from the Eastern empire was called to celebrate both the church's dedication and the founder's baptism at the same time. This dual ceremony was conducted with impressive grandeur, and when Rufinus was purified in the sacred font from all his previous sins, a venerable hermit from Egypt rashly offered to be the sponsor of this proud and ambitious politician.
The character of Theodosius imposed on his minister the task of hypocrisy, which disguised, and sometimes restrained, the abuse of power; and Rufinus was apprehensive of disturbing the indolent slumber of a prince still capable of exerting the abilities and the virtue, which had raised him to the throne. But the absence, and, soon afterwards, the death, of the emperor, confirmed the absolute authority of Rufinus over the person and dominions of Arcadius; a feeble youth, whom the imperious præfect considered as his pupil, rather than his sovereign. Regardless of the public opinion, he indulged his passions without remorse, and without resistance; and his malignant and rapacious spirit rejected every passion that might have contributed to his own glory, or the happiness of the people. His avarice, which seems to have prevailed, in his corrupt mind, over every other sentiment, attracted the wealth of the East, by the various arts of partial and general extortion; oppressive taxes, scandalous bribery, immoderate fines, unjust confiscations, forced or fictitious testaments, by which the tyrant despoiled of their lawful inheritance the children of strangers, or enemies; and the public sale of justice, as well as of favor, which he instituted in the palace of Constantinople. The ambitious candidate eagerly solicited, at the expense of the fairest part of his patrimony, the honors and emoluments of some provincial government; the lives and fortunes of the unhappy people were abandoned to the most liberal purchaser; and the public discontent was sometimes appeased by the sacrifice of an unpopular criminal, whose punishment was profitable only to the præfect of the East, his accomplice and his judge. If avarice were not the blindest of the human passions, the motives of Rufinus might excite our curiosity; and we might be tempted to inquire with what view he violated every principle of humanity and justice, to accumulate those immense treasures, which he could not spend without folly, nor possess without danger. Perhaps he vainly imagined, that he labored for the interest of an only daughter, on whom he intended to bestow his royal pupil, and the august rank of Empress of the East. Perhaps he deceived himself by the opinion, that his avarice was the instrument of his ambition. He aspired to place his fortune on a secure and independent basis, which should no longer depend on the caprice of the young emperor; yet he neglected to conciliate the hearts of the soldiers and people, by the liberal distribution of those riches, which he had acquired with so much toil, and with so much guilt. The extreme parsimony of Rufinus left him only the reproach and envy of ill-gotten wealth; his dependants served him without attachment; the universal hatred of mankind was repressed only by the influence of servile fear. The fate of Lucian proclaimed to the East, that the præfect, whose industry was much abated in the despatch of ordinary business, was active and indefatigable in the pursuit of revenge. Lucian, the son of the præfect Florentius, the oppressor of Gaul, and the enemy of Julian, had employed a considerable part of his inheritance, the fruit of rapine and corruption, to purchase the friendship of Rufinus, and the high office of Count of the East. But the new magistrate imprudently departed from the maxims of the court, and of the times; disgraced his benefactor by the contrast of a virtuous and temperate administration; and presumed to refuse an act of injustice, which might have tended to the profit of the emperor's uncle. Arcadius was easily persuaded to resent the supposed insult; and the præfect of the East resolved to execute in person the cruel vengeance, which he meditated against this ungrateful delegate of his power. He performed with incessant speed the journey of seven or eight hundred miles, from Constantinople to Antioch, entered the capital of Syria at the dead of night, and spread universal consternation among a people ignorant of his design, but not ignorant of his character. The Count of the fifteen provinces of the East was dragged, like the vilest malefactor, before the arbitrary tribunal of Rufinus. Notwithstanding the clearest evidence of his integrity, which was not impeached even by the voice of an accuser, Lucian was condemned, almost with out a trial, to suffer a cruel and ignominious punishment. The ministers of the tyrant, by the orders, and in the presence, of their master, beat him on the neck with leather thongs armed at the extremities with lead; and when he fainted under the violence of the pain, he was removed in a close litter, to conceal his dying agonies from the eyes of the indignant city. No sooner had Rufinus perpetrated this inhuman act, the sole object of his expedition, than he returned, amidst the deep and silent curses of a trembling people, from Antioch to Constantinople; and his diligence was accelerated by the hope of accomplishing, without delay, the nuptials of his daughter with the emperor of the East.
The character of Theodosius forced his minister to act hypocritically, which masked and sometimes controlled the abuse of power; and Rufinus was worried about disrupting the lazy slumber of a prince still able to use the skills and virtues that had brought him to the throne. But the emperor’s absence, and soon after his death, solidified Rufinus's complete control over Arcadius; a weak young man whom the overbearing praefect regarded as his student rather than his ruler. Ignoring public opinion, he indulged his desires without guilt or resistance, and his malicious and greedy nature dismissed any feelings that might have contributed to his own glory or the happiness of the people. His greed, which seemed to overshadow all other emotions in his corrupt mind, drew in the wealth of the East through various means of both petty and large-scale extortion: oppressive taxes, scandalous bribery, excessive fines, unjust confiscations, forced or fake wills that stripped the rightful inheritance from the children of strangers or enemies; and the public sale of justice and favors he instituted in the palace of Constantinople. Ambitious candidates eagerly sought government honors and benefits at the cost of a significant portion of their own wealth; the lives and fortunes of the unfortunate were left to the highest bidder; and public discontent was occasionally silenced by sacrificing an unpopular criminal, whose punishment only benefited the praefect of the East, who was both his accomplice and judge. If greed were not the most blind of human passions, Rufinus’s motives might pique our curiosity, leading us to wonder what drove him to violate every principle of humanity and justice to amass vast treasures that he couldn't spend without foolishness or possess without risk. Perhaps he foolishly believed he was working for the benefit of his only daughter, to whom he hoped to marry off his royal student and elevate to the position of Empress of the East. Perhaps he misled himself into thinking that his greed fueled his ambition. He aspired to establish his wealth on a stable and independent foundation, no longer reliant on the whims of the young emperor; yet, he failed to win the loyalty of the soldiers and the people by generously sharing the riches he had acquired through so much labor and wrongdoing. Rufinus's extreme stinginess left him with nothing but the shame and envy of ill-gotten wealth; his dependents served him without loyalty; and the universal hatred of humanity was only kept in check by the influence of fear. The fate of Lucian showed the East that the praefect, whose efforts were much diminished in handling routine matters, was active and relentless in seeking revenge. Lucian, the son of praefect Florentius, the oppressor of Gaul and enemy of Julian, had spent a significant portion of his inheritance, gained through plunder and corruption, to buy Rufinus’s friendship and the high office of Count of the East. But the new magistrate foolishly strayed from the norms of the court and the times; he shamed his benefactor by contrasting it with a virtuous and moderate administration; and he dared to refuse an act of injustice that could have benefited the emperor’s uncle. Arcadius was easily persuaded to take offense at the supposed slight; and Rufinus, the praefect of the East, decided to personally execute the cruel vengeance he had planned against this ungrateful delegate of his power. He swiftly traveled the seven or eight hundred miles from Constantinople to Antioch, entered the capital of Syria in the dead of night, and created widespread panic among a populace unaware of his intentions but familiar with his reputation. The Count of the fifteen provinces of the East was dragged, like the lowest criminal, before Rufinus’s arbitrary court. Despite the unquestionable evidence of his integrity, which was not challenged even by an accuser, Lucian was condemned, almost without a trial, to undergo a cruel and humiliating punishment. The tyrant's agents, under orders and in the presence of their master, struck him on the neck with leather thongs loaded with lead; and when he fainted from the pain, he was taken away in a closed litter to hide his dying suffering from the eyes of the outraged city. As soon as Rufinus committed this inhumane act, the sole purpose of his expedition, he returned, amidst the deep and silent curses of a terrified populace, from Antioch to Constantinople; and his urgency increased with the hope of swiftly arranging the marriage of his daughter to the emperor of the East.
But Rufinus soon experienced, that a prudent minister should constantly secure his royal captive by the strong, though invisible chain of habit; and that the merit, and much more easily the favor, of the absent, are obliterated in a short time from the mind of a weak and capricious sovereign. While the præfect satiated his revenge at Antioch, a secret conspiracy of the favorite eunuchs, directed by the great chamberlain Eutropius, undermined his power in the palace of Constantinople. They discovered that Arcadius was not inclined to love the daughter of Rufinus, who had been chosen, without his consent, for his bride; and they contrived to substitute in her place the fair Eudoxia, the daughter of Bauto, a general of the Franks in the service of Rome; and who was educated, since the death of her father, in the family of the sons of Promotus. The young emperor, whose chastity had been strictly guarded by the pious care of his tutor Arsenius, eagerly listened to the artful and flattering descriptions of the charms of Eudoxia: he gazed with impatient ardor on her picture, and he understood the necessity of concealing his amorous designs from the knowledge of a minister who was so deeply interested to oppose the consummation of his happiness. Soon after the return of Rufinus, the approaching ceremony of the royal nuptials was announced to the people of Constantinople, who prepared to celebrate, with false and hollow acclamations, the fortune of his daughter. A splendid train of eunuchs and officers issued, in hymeneal pomp, from the gates of the palace; bearing aloft the diadem, the robes, and the inestimable ornaments, of the future empress. The solemn procession passed through the streets of the city, which were adorned with garlands, and filled with spectators; but when it reached the house of the sons of Promotus, the principal eunuch respectfully entered the mansion, invested the fair Eudoxia with the Imperial robes, and conducted her in triumph to the palace and bed of Arcadius. The secrecy and success with which this conspiracy against Rufinus had been conducted, imprinted a mark of indelible ridicule on the character of a minister, who had suffered himself to be deceived, in a post where the arts of deceit and dissimulation constitute the most distinguished merit. He considered, with a mixture of indignation and fear, the victory of an aspiring eunuch, who had secretly captivated the favor of his sovereign; and the disgrace of his daughter, whose interest was inseparably connected with his own, wounded the tenderness, or, at least, the pride of Rufinus. At the moment when he flattered himself that he should become the father of a line of kings, a foreign maid, who had been educated in the house of his implacable enemies, was introduced into the Imperial bed; and Eudoxia soon displayed a superiority of sense and spirit, to improve the ascendant which her beauty must acquire over the mind of a fond and youthful husband. The emperor would soon be instructed to hate, to fear, and to destroy the powerful subject, whom he had injured; and the consciousness of guilt deprived Rufinus of every hope, either of safety or comfort, in the retirement of a private life. But he still possessed the most effectual means of defending his dignity, and perhaps of oppressing his enemies. The præfect still exercised an uncontrolled authority over the civil and military government of the East; and his treasures, if he could resolve to use them, might be employed to procure proper instruments for the execution of the blackest designs, that pride, ambition, and revenge could suggest to a desperate statesman. The character of Rufinus seemed to justify the accusations that he conspired against the person of his sovereign, to seat himself on the vacant throne; and that he had secretly invited the Huns and the Goths to invade the provinces of the empire, and to increase the public confusion. The subtle præfect, whose life had been spent in the intrigues of the palace, opposed, with equal arms, the artful measures of the eunuch Eutropius; but the timid soul of Rufinus was astonished by the hostile approach of a more formidable rival, of the great Stilicho, the general, or rather the master, of the empire of the West.
But Rufinus soon realized that a wise minister should always keep his royal captive bound by the strong, yet invisible chains of routine. He learned that the merits—and even more easily the affections—of those who are absent quickly fade from the minds of a weak and unpredictable ruler. While the prefect took his revenge in Antioch, a secret plot by the favored eunuchs, led by the chief chamberlain Eutropius, eroded his power in the palace of Constantinople. They discovered that Arcadius was not interested in marrying Rufinus's daughter, who had been chosen as his bride without his approval. Instead, they arranged to replace her with the beautiful Eudoxia, the daughter of Bauto, a general of the Franks serving Rome, who had been raised in the household of the sons of Promotus since her father's death. The young emperor, whose chastity had been closely guarded by his devoted tutor Arsenius, eagerly listened to the flattery and enchanting descriptions of Eudoxia's beauty. He gazed with impatient longing at her portrait and understood the need to keep his romantic intentions hidden from a minister who had a vested interest in blocking his happiness. Soon after Rufinus returned, the upcoming royal wedding was announced to the people of Constantinople, who prepared to celebrate, with insincere cheers, the fortune of his daughter. A grand procession of eunuchs and officials left the palace gates in wedding pomp, carrying the diadem, robes, and priceless ornaments of the future empress. The solemn parade moved through the streets, decorated with garlands and filled with onlookers; but when it reached the residence of the sons of Promotus, the head eunuch respectfully entered the house, adorned the lovely Eudoxia with the Imperial robes, and triumphantly escorted her to the palace and Arcadius's bed. The secrecy and success of this plot against Rufinus brought lasting ridicule to a minister who let himself be outsmarted in a position where the skills of deception and dissimulation were integral to success. He felt a mix of anger and fear at the victory of an ambitious eunuch who had secretly won the favor of his emperor; and the embarrassment of his daughter, whose fate was tied to his own, hurt Rufinus's pride, if not his feelings. Just when he thought he would become the father of a lineage of kings, a foreign girl, raised among his bitter enemies, was introduced into the Imperial bed; and Eudoxia soon revealed her intelligence and spirit to leverage the advantage her beauty held over the mind of a young and infatuated husband. The emperor would soon be taught to hate, fear, and eliminate the powerful minister who had wronged him, and the weight of guilt stole every hope of safety or comfort from Rufinus’s secluded life. However, he still had effective means to defend his position and perhaps crush his rivals. The prefect maintained unchecked authority over the civil and military administration in the East, and his wealth, if he chose to use it, could procure the right tools for executing the darkest schemes that pride, ambition, and revenge might inspire in a desperate politician. Rufinus's behavior seemed to validate allegations that he conspired against his sovereign to claim the empty throne, and that he secretly invited the Huns and the Goths to invade the empire's provinces, deepening public chaos. The cunning prefect, whose life was spent in palace intrigues, matched the sly strategies of the eunuch Eutropius with his own; but the fearful nature of Rufinus was taken aback by the threatening arrival of a more formidable rival, Stilicho, the general, or rather the master, of the Western Empire.
The celestial gift, which Achilles obtained, and Alexander envied, of a poet worthy to celebrate the actions of heroes has been enjoyed by Stilicho, in a much higher degree than might have been expected from the declining state of genius, and of art. The muse of Claudian, devoted to his service, was always prepared to stigmatize his adversaries, Rufinus, or Eutropius, with eternal infamy; or to paint, in the most splendid colors, the victories and virtues of a powerful benefactor. In the review of a period indifferently supplied with authentic materials, we cannot refuse to illustrate the annals of Honorius, from the invectives, or the panegyrics, of a contemporary writer; but as Claudian appears to have indulged the most ample privilege of a poet and a courtier, some criticism will be requisite to translate the language of fiction or exaggeration, into the truth and simplicity of historic prose. His silence concerning the family of Stilicho may be admitted as a proof, that his patron was neither able, nor desirous, to boast of a long series of illustrious progenitors; and the slight mention of his father, an officer of Barbarian cavalry in the service of Valens, seems to countenance the assertion, that the general, who so long commanded the armies of Rome, was descended from the savage and perfidious race of the Vandals. If Stilicho had not possessed the external advantages of strength and stature, the most flattering bard, in the presence of so many thousand spectators, would have hesitated to affirm, that he surpassed the measure of the demi-gods of antiquity; and that whenever he moved, with lofty steps, through the streets of the capital, the astonished crowd made room for the stranger, who displayed, in a private condition, the awful majesty of a hero. From his earliest youth he embraced the profession of arms; his prudence and valor were soon distinguished in the field; the horsemen and archers of the East admired his superior dexterity; and in each degree of his military promotions, the public judgment always prevented and approved the choice of the sovereign. He was named, by Theodosius, to ratify a solemn treaty with the monarch of Persia; he supported, during that important embassy, the dignity of the Roman name; and after he return to Constantinople, his merit was rewarded by an intimate and honorable alliance with the Imperial family. Theodosius had been prompted, by a pious motive of fraternal affection, to adopt, for his own, the daughter of his brother Honorius; the beauty and accomplishments of Serena were universally admired by the obsequious court; and Stilicho obtained the preference over a crowd of rivals, who ambitiously disputed the hand of the princess, and the favor of her adopted father. The assurance that the husband of Serena would be faithful to the throne, which he was permitted to approach, engaged the emperor to exalt the fortunes, and to employ the abilities, of the sagacious and intrepid Stilicho. He rose, through the successive steps of master of the horse, and count of the domestics, to the supreme rank of master-general of all the cavalry and infantry of the Roman, or at least of the Western, empire; and his enemies confessed, that he invariably disdained to barter for gold the rewards of merit, or to defraud the soldiers of the pay and gratifications which they deserved or claimed, from the liberality of the state. The valor and conduct which he afterwards displayed, in the defence of Italy, against the arms of Alaric and Radagaisus, may justify the fame of his early achievements and in an age less attentive to the laws of honor, or of pride, the Roman generals might yield the preeminence of rank, to the ascendant of superior genius. He lamented, and revenged, the murder of Promotus, his rival and his friend; and the massacre of many thousands of the flying Bastarnæ is represented by the poet as a bloody sacrifice, which the Roman Achilles offered to the manes of another Patroclus. The virtues and victories of Stilicho deserved the hatred of Rufinus: and the arts of calumny might have been successful if the tender and vigilant Serena had not protected her husband against his domestic foes, whilst he vanquished in the field the enemies of the empire. Theodosius continued to support an unworthy minister, to whose diligence he delegated the government of the palace, and of the East; but when he marched against the tyrant Eugenius, he associated his faithful general to the labors and glories of the civil war; and in the last moments of his life, the dying monarch recommended to Stilicho the care of his sons, and of the republic. The ambition and the abilities of Stilicho were not unequal to the important trust; and he claimed the guardianship of the two empires, during the minority of Arcadius and Honorius. The first measure of his administration, or rather of his reign, displayed to the nations the vigor and activity of a spirit worthy to command. He passed the Alps in the depth of winter; descended the stream of the Rhine, from the fortress of Basil to the marshes of Batavia; reviewed the state of the garrisons; repressed the enterprises of the Germans; and, after establishing along the banks a firm and honorable peace, returned, with incredible speed, to the palace of Milan. The person and court of Honorius were subject to the master-general of the West; and the armies and provinces of Europe obeyed, without hesitation, a regular authority, which was exercised in the name of their young sovereign. Two rivals only remained to dispute the claims, and to provoke the vengeance, of Stilicho. Within the limits of Africa, Gildo, the Moor, maintained a proud and dangerous independence; and the minister of Constantinople asserted his equal reign over the emperor, and the empire, of the East.
The celestial gift that Achilles received and that Alexander envied—of having a poet worthy enough to celebrate the deeds of heroes—was enjoyed by Stilicho, in a much greater way than one might expect from the fading state of talent and artistry. Claudian, devoted to him, was always ready to brand his opponents, Rufinus and Eutropius, with eternal disgrace or to vividly portray the victories and virtues of a powerful benefactor. In looking back at a time that lacked reliable sources, we can’t ignore the importance of Claudian's attacks and praises in detailing the history of Honorius; however, since Claudian took liberties as a poet and courtier, some critique is necessary to translate his embellished language into the straightforwardness of historical writing. His lack of mention of Stilicho's family suggests that his patron could neither boast of a long line of illustrious ancestors nor did he want to; the brief mention of his father, a Barbarian cavalry officer serving Valens, supports the idea that the general who led Rome's armies for so long came from the savage and treacherous lineage of the Vandals. Had Stilicho not had the external advantages of strength and stature, even the most flattering bard would have hesitated to claim, in front of thousands of spectators, that he surpassed the demi-gods of old; and whenever he strode with lofty steps through the capital’s streets, the amazed crowd would part for the stranger, who, in his private life, displayed the commanding presence of a hero. He embraced a military career from a young age; his wisdom and bravery quickly set him apart in battle; the horsemen and archers of the East admired his exceptional skill; and at every stage of his military career, public opinion consistently supported the choices made by the emperor. Theodosius appointed him to confirm a formal treaty with the king of Persia; during that important mission, he upheld the dignity of the Roman name; and after returning to Constantinople, his achievements earned him a close and honorable alliance with the imperial family. Theodosius, motivated by a genuine sense of brotherly love, adopted the daughter of his brother Honorius as his own; Serena’s beauty and accomplishments were widely admired by the subservient court, and Stilicho won her hand over numerous rivals competing for the princess’ favor and the affection of her adoptive father. The assurance that Serena’s husband would be loyal to the throne he was allowed to access led the emperor to elevate Stilicho’s fortunes and utilize his skills. He climbed through the ranks from master of the horse and count of the domestics to the top position of master-general of all the cavalry and infantry of the Roman—or at least the Western—empire; and even his enemies admitted that he consistently refused to exchange the rewards of merit for gold or to shortchange soldiers on their deserved pay and bonuses from the state's generosity. The courage and strategy he later showed in defending Italy against Alaric and Radagaisus justify the reputation he gained from earlier feats, and in a time less concerned with the rules of honor and pride, Roman generals might yield their high ranks for the brilliance of a superior mind. He mourned and avenged the murder of Promotus, both his rival and friend; and the poet depicts the slaughter of many thousands of fleeing Bastarnæ as a bloody sacrifice that the Roman Achilles made for the spirit of another Patroclus. Stilicho’s virtues and victories earned him the hatred of Rufinus, and the tactics of slander might have prevailed if the caring and vigilant Serena hadn’t shielded her husband from domestic foes while he dealt with the empire's enemies in battle. Theodosius continued to support an unworthy minister to whom he entrusted the governance of the palace and the East; but when he campaigned against the tyrant Eugenius, he included his loyal general in the efforts and glorifications of the civil war; and in his dying moments, the monarch entrusted Stilicho with the care of his sons and the republic. Stilicho’s ambition and abilities matched this important responsibility; he claimed guardianship over both empires during the minority of Arcadius and Honorius. His first action in office, or rather his reign, showcased a vigor and active spirit worthy of command to the nations. He crossed the Alps in the depths of winter; sailed down the Rhine from the fortress of Basel to the marshes of Batavia; checked on the state of the garrisons; thwarted the efforts of the Germans; and after securing a firm and honorable peace along the rivers, he returned with incredible speed to the palace in Milan. The person and court of Honorius were under the authority of the master-general of the West; and the armies and provinces of Europe obeyed, without hesitation, a structured authority exercised in the name of their young sovereign. Only two rivals remained to challenge Stilicho's claims and provoke his wrath. In Africa, Gildo, the Moor, held a challenging and dangerous independence, while the minister of Constantinople asserted his equal reign over both the emperor and the empire of the East.
Chapter XXIX: Division Of Roman Empire Between Sons Of Theodosius.—Part II.
The impartiality which Stilicho affected, as the common guardian of the royal brothers, engaged him to regulate the equal division of the arms, the jewels, and the magnificent wardrobe and furniture of the deceased emperor. But the most important object of the inheritance consisted of the numerous legions, cohorts, and squadrons, of Romans, or Barbarians, whom the event of the civil war had united under the standard of Theodosius. The various multitudes of Europe and Asia, exasperated by recent animosities, were overawed by the authority of a single man; and the rigid discipline of Stilicho protected the lands of the citizens from the rapine of the licentious soldier. Anxious, however, and impatient, to relieve Italy from the presence of this formidable host, which could be useful only on the frontiers of the empire, he listened to the just requisition of the minister of Arcadius, declared his intention of reconducting in person the troops of the East, and dexterously employed the rumor of a Gothic tumult to conceal his private designs of ambition and revenge. The guilty soul of Rufinus was alarmed by the approach of a warrior and a rival, whose enmity he deserved; he computed, with increasing terror, the narrow space of his life and greatness; and, as the last hope of safety, he interposed the authority of the emperor Arcadius. Stilicho, who appears to have directed his march along the sea-coast of the Adriatic, was not far distant from the city of Thessalonica, when he received a peremptory message, to recall the troops of the East, and to declare, that his nearer approach would be considered, by the Byzantine court, as an act of hostility. The prompt and unexpected obedience of the general of the West, convinced the vulgar of his loyalty and moderation; and, as he had already engaged the affection of the Eastern troops, he recommended to their zeal the execution of his bloody design, which might be accomplished in his absence, with less danger, perhaps, and with less reproach. Stilicho left the command of the troops of the East to Gainas, the Goth, on whose fidelity he firmly relied, with an assurance, at least, that the hardy Barbarians would never be diverted from his purpose by any consideration of fear or remorse. The soldiers were easily persuaded to punish the enemy of Stilicho and of Rome; and such was the general hatred which Rufinus had excited, that the fatal secret, communicated to thousands, was faithfully preserved during the long march from Thessalonica to the gates of Constantinople. As soon as they had resolved his death, they condescended to flatter his pride; the ambitious præfect was seduced to believe, that those powerful auxiliaries might be tempted to place the diadem on his head; and the treasures which he distributed, with a tardy and reluctant hand, were accepted by the indignant multitude as an insult, rather than as a gift. At the distance of a mile from the capital, in the field of Mars, before the palace of Hebdomon, the troops halted: and the emperor, as well as his minister, advanced, according to ancient custom, respectfully to salute the power which supported their throne. As Rufinus passed along the ranks, and disguised, with studied courtesy, his innate haughtiness, the wings insensibly wheeled from the right and left, and enclosed the devoted victim within the circle of their arms. Before he could reflect on the danger of his situation, Gainas gave the signal of death; a daring and forward soldier plunged his sword into the breast of the guilty præfect, and Rufinus fell, groaned, and expired, at the feet of the affrighted emperor. If the agonies of a moment could expiate the crimes of a whole life, or if the outrages inflicted on a breathless corpse could be the object of pity, our humanity might perhaps be affected by the horrid circumstances which accompanied the murder of Rufinus. His mangled body was abandoned to the brutal fury of the populace of either sex, who hastened in crowds, from every quarter of the city, to trample on the remains of the haughty minister, at whose frown they had so lately trembled. His right hand was cut off, and carried through the streets of Constantinople, in cruel mockery, to extort contributions for the avaricious tyrant, whose head was publicly exposed, borne aloft on the point of a long lance. According to the savage maxims of the Greek republics, his innocent family would have shared the punishment of his crimes. The wife and daughter of Rufinus were indebted for their safety to the influence of religion. Her sanctuary protected them from the raging madness of the people; and they were permitted to spend the remainder of their lives in the exercise of Christian devotions, in the peaceful retirement of Jerusalem.
The neutrality that Stilicho aimed for, as the common protector of the royal brothers, encouraged him to manage the fair distribution of weapons, jewels, and the impressive wardrobe and furnishings of the late emperor. However, the most significant part of the inheritance consisted of the many legions, cohorts, and squadrons, of Romans and Barbarians, brought together under Theodosius due to the civil war. The diverse crowds from Europe and Asia, fueled by recent conflicts, were intimidated by the authority of one man; Stilicho’s strict discipline kept the citizens' lands safe from the looting of unruly soldiers. Still, eager and impatient to free Italy from this threatening army, which could only be useful at the borders of the empire, he heeded the fair request from Arcadius's minister, declared his plan to personally lead the Eastern troops back, and skillfully used rumors of a Gothic uprising to mask his personal ambitions and desires for revenge. Rufinus, feeling guilty, was frightened by the arrival of a warrior and rival he rightfully feared; he increasingly realized how limited his life and power were; and as a last resort, he invoked the authority of Emperor Arcadius. Stilicho, who seemed to have directed his march along the Adriatic coastline, was not far from Thessalonica when he received a demanding message to dismiss the Eastern troops and to state that his closer approach would be seen by the Byzantine court as an act of hostility. The swift and unexpected compliance of the Western general reassured the common people of his loyalty and restraint; and since he had already won the loyalty of the Eastern troops, he encouraged them to execute his deadly plan, which could be carried out in his absence, perhaps with less risk and blame. Stilicho entrusted the command of the Eastern troops to Gainas, the Goth, whom he trusted to be loyal at least enough to know that the fierce Barbarians would never be swayed from their goal by fear or regret. The soldiers were easily convinced to punish the enemies of Stilicho and Rome; and so deep was the general animosity towards Rufinus that the deadly secret, shared with thousands, remained confidential throughout the long march from Thessalonica to the gates of Constantinople. Once they decided on his assassination, they flattered his ego; the ambitious præfect was led to believe that these powerful allies might be tempted to crown him; and the riches he distributed, albeit in a hesitant manner, were seen by the angry crowd as an insult rather than a gift. A mile from the capital, in the field of Mars, before the palace of Hebdomon, the troops halted: and both the emperor and his minister approached, as was the tradition, respectfully to greet the force that upheld their throne. As Rufinus walked along the lines, masking his inherent arrogance with feigned courtesy, the troops gradually closed in around him, enclosing the doomed victim. Before he could grasp the danger he was in, Gainas signaled for his death; a bold soldier drove his sword into Rufinus's chest, and he collapsed, groaning, at the feet of the terrified emperor. If the pain of a moment could atone for a lifetime of sins, or if the outrage inflicted on a lifeless body could evoke pity, we might be moved by the gruesome details surrounding Rufinus's murder. His dismembered body was left to the brutal rage of the crowd, who rushed from every direction to stomp on the remains of the once-feared minister. His right hand was severed and paraded through the streets of Constantinople in cruel mockery, eliciting contributions for the greedy tyrant, whose head was publicly displayed on a long lance. According to the harsh traditions of the Greek city-states, his innocent family would have shared in his punishment. Rufinus's wife and daughter were spared thanks to the protection of religion. Her sanctuary shielded them from the violent rage of the populace; they were allowed to live out their days in Christian devotion in the peaceful solitude of Jerusalem.
The servile poet of Stilicho applauds, with ferocious joy, this horrid deed, which, in the execution, perhaps, of justice, violated every law of nature and society, profaned the majesty of the prince, and renewed the dangerous examples of military license. The contemplation of the universal order and harmony had satisfied Claudian of the existence of the Deity; but the prosperous impunity of vice appeared to contradict his moral attributes; and the fate of Rufinus was the only event which could dispel the religious doubts of the poet. Such an act might vindicate the honor of Providence, but it did not much contribute to the happiness of the people. In less than three months they were informed of the maxims of the new administration, by a singular edict, which established the exclusive right of the treasury over the spoils of Rufinus; and silenced, under heavy penalties, the presumptuous claims of the subjects of the Eastern empire, who had been injured by his rapacious tyranny. Even Stilicho did not derive from the murder of his rival the fruit which he had proposed; and though he gratified his revenge, his ambition was disappointed. Under the name of a favorite, the weakness of Arcadius required a master, but he naturally preferred the obsequious arts of the eunuch Eutropius, who had obtained his domestic confidence: and the emperor contemplated, with terror and aversion, the stern genius of a foreign warrior. Till they were divided by the jealousy of power, the sword of Gainas, and the charms of Eudoxia, supported the favor of the great chamberlain of the palace: the perfidious Goth, who was appointed master-general of the East, betrayed, without scruple, the interest of his benefactor; and the same troops, who had so lately massacred the enemy of Stilicho, were engaged to support, against him, the independence of the throne of Constantinople. The favorites of Arcadius fomented a secret and irreconcilable war against a formidable hero, who aspired to govern, and to defend, the two empires of Rome, and the two sons of Theodosius. They incessantly labored, by dark and treacherous machinations, to deprive him of the esteem of the prince, the respect of the people, and the friendship of the Barbarians. The life of Stilicho was repeatedly attempted by the dagger of hired assassins; and a decree was obtained from the senate of Constantinople, to declare him an enemy of the republic, and to confiscate his ample possessions in the provinces of the East. At a time when the only hope of delaying the ruin of the Roman name depended on the firm union, and reciprocal aid, of all the nations to whom it had been gradually communicated, the subjects of Arcadius and Honorius were instructed, by their respective masters, to view each other in a foreign, and even hostile, light; to rejoice in their mutual calamities, and to embrace, as their faithful allies, the Barbarians, whom they excited to invade the territories of their countrymen. The natives of Italy affected to despise the servile and effeminate Greeks of Byzantium, who presumed to imitate the dress, and to usurp the dignity, of Roman senators; and the Greeks had not yet forgot the sentiments of hatred and contempt, which their polished ancestors had so long entertained for the rude inhabitants of the West. The distinction of two governments, which soon produced the separation of two nations, will justify my design of suspending the series of the Byzantine history, to prosecute, without interruption, the disgraceful, but memorable, reign of Honorius.
The subservient poet of Stilicho cheers, with fierce joy, this terrible act, which, in the name of justice, broke every law of nature and society, disrespected the authority of the prince, and revived perilous examples of military overreach. The sight of universal order and harmony had convinced Claudian of the existence of God; however, the unpunished success of wrongdoing seemed to contradict His moral qualities, and the downfall of Rufinus was the only event that could clear the poet's religious doubts. Such an act might restore the honor of Providence, but it didn't do much for the happiness of the people. In less than three months, they learned about the principles of the new administration through a surprising edict that established the treasury's exclusive claim over Rufinus's spoils and silenced, under heavy penalties, the bold claims of the subjects from the Eastern Empire who had suffered from his greedy tyranny. Even Stilicho did not gain from his rival's murder the benefits he had sought; and although he satisfied his thirst for revenge, his ambitions fell short. Under the guise of a favorite, Arcadius's weakness demanded a master, but he naturally favored the submissive maneuvers of the eunuch Eutropius, who had gained his trust: and the emperor regarded, with fear and loathing, the stern presence of a foreign warrior. Until they were torn apart by jealousies over power, the sword of Gainas and the allure of Eudoxia upheld the favor of the palace's great chamberlain: the treacherous Goth, appointed master-general of the East, shamelessly betrayed his benefactor's interests; and the same troops that had recently slaughtered Stilicho's enemy were recruited to support the independence of the throne of Constantinople against him. Arcadius's favorites fueled a covert and irreconcilable war against a formidable hero who aspired to govern and defend both empires of Rome and the two sons of Theodosius. They tirelessly worked through dark and deceitful schemes to strip him of the prince's favor, the people's respect, and the Barbarians' friendship. There were numerous attempts on Stilicho's life by hired assassins, and a decree was passed by the Senate of Constantinople declaring him an enemy of the state and seizing his extensive possessions in the Eastern provinces. At a time when the only hope for stalling the decline of the Roman name relied on the solid unity and mutual support of all the nations it had gradually reached, the subjects of Arcadius and Honorius were instructed, by their respective rulers, to view each other as foreign, even hostile; to take joy in each other's misfortunes, and to embrace, as loyal allies, the Barbarians they incited to invade their fellow countrymen's lands. The Italians pretended to look down on the submissive and soft Greeks of Byzantium, who dared to mimic their attire and claimed the stature of Roman senators; while the Greeks had not yet forgotten the hatred and contempt that their refined ancestors had long harbored for the rough dwellers of the West. The division of these two governments, which soon led to the separation of two nations, will justify my decision to pause the narrative of Byzantine history to uninterruptedly pursue the shameful yet remarkable reign of Honorius.
The prudent Stilicho, instead of persisting to force the inclinations of a prince, and people, who rejected his government, wisely abandoned Arcadius to his unworthy favorites; and his reluctance to involve the two empires in a civil war displayed the moderation of a minister, who had so often signalized his military spirit and abilities. But if Stilicho had any longer endured the revolt of Africa, he would have betrayed the security of the capital, and the majesty of the Western emperor, to the capricious insolence of a Moorish rebel. Gildo, the brother of the tyrant Firmus, had preserved and obtained, as the reward of his apparent fidelity, the immense patrimony which was forfeited by treason: long and meritorious service, in the armies of Rome, raised him to the dignity of a military count; the narrow policy of the court of Theodosius had adopted the mischievous expedient of supporting a legal government by the interest of a powerful family; and the brother of Firmus was invested with the command of Africa. His ambition soon usurped the administration of justice, and of the finances, without account, and without control; and he maintained, during a reign of twelve years, the possession of an office, from which it was impossible to remove him, without the danger of a civil war. During those twelve years, the provinces of Africa groaned under the dominion of a tyrant, who seemed to unite the unfeeling temper of a stranger with the partial resentments of domestic faction. The forms of law were often superseded by the use of poison; and if the trembling guests, who were invited to the table of Gildo, presumed to express fears, the insolent suspicion served only to excite his fury, and he loudly summoned the ministers of death. Gildo alternately indulged the passions of avarice and lust; and if his days were terrible to the rich, his nights were not less dreadful to husbands and parents. The fairest of their wives and daughters were prostituted to the embraces of the tyrant; and afterwards abandoned to a ferocious troop of Barbarians and assassins, the black, or swarthy, natives of the desert; whom Gildo considered as the only guardians of his throne. In the civil war between Theodosius and Eugenius, the count, or rather the sovereign, of Africa, maintained a haughty and suspicious neutrality; refused to assist either of the contending parties with troops or vessels, expected the declaration of fortune, and reserved for the conqueror the vain professions of his allegiance. Such professions would not have satisfied the master of the Roman world; but the death of Theodosius, and the weakness and discord of his sons, confirmed the power of the Moor; who condescended, as a proof of his moderation, to abstain from the use of the diadem, and to supply Rome with the customary tribute, or rather subsidy, of corn. In every division of the empire, the five provinces of Africa were invariably assigned to the West; and Gildo had to govern that extensive country in the name of Honorius, but his knowledge of the character and designs of Stilicho soon engaged him to address his homage to a more distant and feeble sovereign. The ministers of Arcadius embraced the cause of a perfidious rebel; and the delusive hope of adding the numerous cities of Africa to the empire of the East, tempted them to assert a claim, which they were incapable of supporting, either by reason or by arms.
The wise Stilicho, instead of trying to impose his authority on a prince and populace who rejected his rule, wisely left Arcadius to his undeserving favorites. His decision to avoid dragging the two empires into a civil war showed the restraint of a minister who had frequently demonstrated his military prowess and skills. However, if Stilicho had tolerated the rebellion in Africa any longer, he would have risked the safety of the capital and the dignity of the Western emperor to the unpredictable arrogance of a Moorish rebel. Gildo, the brother of the tyrant Firmus, had secured and gained, as a reward for his supposed loyalty, the vast inheritance lost due to treason: his long and commendable service in the Roman armies elevated him to the rank of a military count. The cautious approach of Theodosius' court had adopted the harmful strategy of supporting a legitimate government through the influence of a powerful family, and Firmus's brother was given command of Africa. His ambition soon took over the administration of justice and finances without oversight and without accountability; he held onto his position for twelve years, making it impossible to remove him without risking a civil war. Throughout those twelve years, the provinces of Africa suffered under the rule of a tyrant who combined the callousness of a foreigner with the partial grievances of internal conflict. Legal processes were frequently bypassed through poison; and if the terrified guests at Gildo's table dared express their fears, their audible worries only enraged him further, prompting him to call for executioners. Gildo alternated between indulging in greed and lust; while his days were dreadful for the wealthy, his nights were equally terrifying for husbands and parents. The most beautiful wives and daughters were handed over to the tyrant, only to be then discarded to a brutal band of Barbarians and assassins, the dark-skinned natives of the desert, whom Gildo claimed as the only protectors of his throne. During the civil conflict between Theodosius and Eugenius, the count—or rather the ruler—of Africa maintained an arrogant and distrustful neutrality; he refused to support either side with troops or ships, awaited the outcome, and reserved his empty declarations of loyalty for the victor. Such claims would not have satisfied the master of the Roman world; however, with the death of Theodosius, and the weakness and discord among his sons, the Moor's power was strengthened. He condescended, as a sign of his moderation, to refrain from using the royal crown and to provide Rome with the usual tribute, or more accurately, subsidy, of grain. In every division of the empire, the five provinces of Africa were consistently assigned to the West; and Gildo was to rule that vast territory in the name of Honorius, but his understanding of Stilicho's character and intentions soon led him to offer his loyalty to a more distant and weaker sovereign. Arcadius's ministers supported a treacherous rebel; and the deceptive hope of adding the many cities of Africa to the eastern empire tempted them to stake a claim they couldn't support, neither through reasoning nor through military strength.
When Stilicho had given a firm and decisive answer to the pretensions of the Byzantine court, he solemnly accused the tyrant of Africa before the tribunal, which had formerly judged the kings and nations of the earth; and the image of the republic was revived, after a long interval, under the reign of Honorius. The emperor transmitted an accurate and ample detail of the complaints of the provincials, and the crimes of Gildo, to the Roman senate; and the members of that venerable assembly were required to pronounce the condemnation of the rebel. Their unanimous suffrage declared him the enemy of the republic; and the decree of the senate added a sacred and legitimate sanction to the Roman arms. A people, who still remembered that their ancestors had been the masters of the world, would have applauded, with conscious pride, the representation of ancient freedom; if they had not since been accustomed to prefer the solid assurance of bread to the unsubstantial visions of liberty and greatness. The subsistence of Rome depended on the harvests of Africa; and it was evident, that a declaration of war would be the signal of famine. The præfect Symmachus, who presided in the deliberations of the senate, admonished the minister of his just apprehension, that as soon as the revengeful Moor should prohibit the exportation of corn, the tranquility and perhaps the safety, of the capital would be threatened by the hungry rage of a turbulent multitude. The prudence of Stilicho conceived and executed, without delay, the most effectual measure for the relief of the Roman people. A large and seasonable supply of corn, collected in the inland provinces of Gaul, was embarked on the rapid stream of the Rhone, and transported, by an easy navigation, from the Rhone to the Tyber. During the whole term of the African war, the granaries of Rome were continually filled, her dignity was vindicated from the humiliating dependence, and the minds of an immense people were quieted by the calm confidence of peace and plenty.
When Stilicho firmly responded to the ambitions of the Byzantine court, he officially accused the tyrant of Africa in front of the tribunal that had previously judged kings and nations. The image of the republic was revived, after a long time, during Honorius's reign. The emperor sent a detailed account of the provincials' complaints and Gildo's crimes to the Roman senate, and the members of that respected assembly were tasked with condemning the rebel. Their unanimous vote declared him the enemy of the republic, and the senate's decree gave sacred and legitimate authority to the Roman military. A people who still remembered that their ancestors had once ruled the world would have proudly applauded the revival of ancient freedom, if they hadn’t grown accustomed to valuing the certainty of food over the fleeting ideals of liberty and greatness. Rome's survival depended on harvests from Africa, and it was clear that declaring war would signal famine. The prefect Symmachus, who oversaw the senate's discussions, warned the minister of his valid concern that if the vengeful Moor stopped the export of grain, the peace and possibly the safety of the capital would be threatened by a hungry, restless crowd. Stilicho wisely devised and quickly enacted the most effective measure for the relief of the Roman people. A substantial and timely supply of grain, gathered from the inland provinces of Gaul, was loaded onto the fast-flowing Rhone River and easily transported to the Tiber. Throughout the entirety of the African war, Rome's granaries remained full, her dignity was restored from humiliating dependence, and the minds of a vast population were calmed by the reassuring presence of peace and abundance.
The cause of Rome, and the conduct of the African war, were intrusted by Stilicho to a general, active and ardent to avenge his private injuries on the head of the tyrant. The spirit of discord which prevailed in the house of Nabal, had excited a deadly quarrel between two of his sons, Gildo and Mascezel. The usurper pursued, with implacable rage, the life of his younger brother, whose courage and abilities he feared; and Mascezel, oppressed by superior power, took refuge in the court of Milan, where he soon received the cruel intelligence that his two innocent and helpless children had been murdered by their inhuman uncle. The affliction of the father was suspended only by the desire of revenge. The vigilant Stilicho already prepared to collect the naval and military force of the Western empire; and he had resolved, if the tyrant should be able to wage an equal and doubtful war, to march against him in person. But as Italy required his presence, and as it might be dangerous to weaken the defence of the frontier, he judged it more advisable, that Mascezel should attempt this arduous adventure at the head of a chosen body of Gallic veterans, who had lately served under the standard of Eugenius. These troops, who were exhorted to convince the world that they could subvert, as well as defend the throne of a usurper, consisted of the Jovian, the Herculian, and the Augustan legions; of the Nervian auxiliaries; of the soldiers who displayed in their banners the symbol of a lion, and of the troops which were distinguished by the auspicious names of Fortunate, and Invincible. Yet such was the smallness of their establishments, or the difficulty of recruiting, that these seven bands, of high dignity and reputation in the service of Rome, amounted to no more than five thousand effective men. The fleet of galleys and transports sailed in tempestuous weather from the port of Pisa, in Tuscany, and steered their course to the little island of Capraria; which had borrowed that name from the wild goats, its original inhabitants, whose place was occupied by a new colony of a strange and savage appearance. "The whole island (says an ingenious traveller of those times) is filled, or rather defiled, by men who fly from the light. They call themselves Monks, or solitaries, because they choose to live alone, without any witnesses of their actions. They fear the gifts of fortune, from the apprehension of losing them; and, lest they should be miserable, they embrace a life of voluntary wretchedness. How absurd is their choice! how perverse their understanding! to dread the evils, without being able to support the blessings, of the human condition. Either this melancholy madness is the effect of disease, or exercise on their own bodies the tortures which are inflicted on fugitive slaves by the hand of justice." Such was the contempt of a profane magistrate for the monks as the chosen servants of God. Some of them were persuaded, by his entreaties, to embark on board the fleet; and it is observed, to the praise of the Roman general, that his days and nights were employed in prayer, fasting, and the occupation of singing psalms. The devout leader, who, with such a reenforcement, appeared confident of victory, avoided the dangerous rocks of Corsica, coasted along the eastern side of Sardinia, and secured his ships against the violence of the south wind, by casting anchor in the and capacious harbor of Cagliari, at the distance of one hundred and forty miles from the African shores.
The responsibility for Rome and the conduct of the African war was given by Stilicho to a general eager to take revenge on the tyrant for his personal grievances. The discord within Nabal's household sparked a deadly feud between his two sons, Gildo and Mascezel. The usurper relentlessly sought to eliminate his younger brother, whose bravery and skills he feared; in response, Mascezel, overwhelmed by greater power, sought refuge in the court of Milan. There, he soon received the devastating news that his two innocent and defenseless children had been killed by their cruel uncle. The father's grief was only interrupted by his thirst for revenge. Stilicho, always watchful, was already preparing to gather the naval and military forces of the Western Empire. He planned to take personal command if the tyrant managed to engage in a fair and uncertain war. However, as Italy needed his presence and it could be risky to weaken the front lines, he decided it was better for Mascezel to lead this difficult venture with a select group of experienced Gallic veterans who had recently served under Eugenius. These troops, urged to prove that they could both topple and protect a usurper's throne, included the Jovian, Herculian, and Augustan legions; the Nervian auxiliaries; soldiers bearing the symbol of a lion on their banners; and troops known by the favorable names of Fortunate and Invincible. Yet, due to the limited size of their forces and the challenges of recruitment, these seven prestigious bands serving Rome totaled only around five thousand effective men. The fleet of galleys and transports set sail in stormy weather from the port of Pisa in Tuscany, heading for the small island of Capraria, which got its name from the wild goats that once inhabited it, now replaced by a new colony of a peculiar and fierce appearance. "The whole island (says an insightful traveler from that era) is either filled or corrupted by men who avoid the light. They call themselves Monks or solitaries, as they choose to live alone, without witnesses to their actions. They fear the gifts of fortune, afraid of losing them, and to avoid misery, they embrace a life of voluntary suffering. How absurd is their choice! How twisted their thinking! to dread the misfortunes while being unable to endure the blessings of being human. Either this gloomy madness is the result of illness, or they inflict on themselves the torments that are imposed on fleeing slaves by the hand of justice." Such was the disdain of a secular magistrate for the monks as the chosen servants of God. Some were convinced by his pleas to board the fleet; it is noted, in praise of the Roman general, that he dedicated his days and nights to prayer, fasting, and singing psalms. The devout leader, confident of victory with this reinforcement, avoided the treacherous rocks of Corsica, sailed along the eastern coast of Sardinia, and secured his ships against the strong south winds by anchoring in the spacious harbor of Cagliari, a hundred and forty miles from the African shores.
Gildo was prepared to resist the invasion with all the forces of Africa. By the liberality of his gifts and promises, he endeavored to secure the doubtful allegiance of the Roman soldiers, whilst he attracted to his standard the distant tribes of Gætulia and Æthiopia. He proudly reviewed an army of seventy thousand men, and boasted, with the rash presumption which is the forerunner of disgrace, that his numerous cavalry would trample under their horses' feet the troops of Mascezel, and involve, in a cloud of burning sand, the natives of the cold regions of Gaul and Germany. But the Moor, who commanded the legions of Honorius, was too well acquainted with the manners of his countrymen, to entertain any serious apprehension of a naked and disorderly host of Barbarians; whose left arm, instead of a shield, was protected only by mantle; who were totally disarmed as soon as they had darted their javelin from their right hand; and whose horses had never been in combat. He fixed his camp of five thousand veterans in the face of a superior enemy, and, after the delay of three days, gave the signal of a general engagement. As Mascezel advanced before the front with fair offers of peace and pardon, he encountered one of the foremost standard-bearers of the Africans, and, on his refusal to yield, struck him on the arm with his sword. The arm, and the standard, sunk under the weight of the blow; and the imaginary act of submission was hastily repeated by all the standards of the line. At this the disaffected cohorts proclaimed the name of their lawful sovereign; the Barbarians, astonished by the defection of their Roman allies, dispersed, according to their custom, in tumultuary flight; and Mascezel obtained the honours of an easy, and almost bloodless, victory. The tyrant escaped from the field of battle to the sea-shore; and threw himself into a small vessel, with the hope of reaching in safety some friendly port of the empire of the East; but the obstinacy of the wind drove him back into the harbor of Tabraca, which had acknowledged, with the rest of the province, the dominion of Honorius, and the authority of his lieutenant. The inhabitants, as a proof of their repentance and loyalty, seized and confined the person of Gildo in a dungeon; and his own despair saved him from the intolerable torture of supporting the presence of an injured and victorious brother. The captives and the spoils of Africa were laid at the feet of the emperor; but more sincere, in the midst of prosperity, still affected to consult the laws of the republic; and referred to the senate and people of Rome the judgment of the most illustrious criminals. Their trial was public and solemn; but the judges, in the exercise of this obsolete and precarious jurisdiction, were impatient to punish the African magistrates, who had intercepted the subsistence of the Roman people. The rich and guilty province was oppressed by the Imperial ministers, who had a visible interest to multiply the number of the accomplices of Gildo; and if an edict of Honorius seems to check the malicious industry of informers, a subsequent edict, at the distance of ten years, continues and renews the prosecution of the offences which had been committed in the time of the general rebellion. The adherents of the tyrant who escaped the first fury of the soldiers, and the judges, might derive some consolation from the tragic fate of his brother, who could never obtain his pardon for the extraordinary services which he had performed. After he had finished an important war in the space of a single winter, Mascezel was received at the court of Milan with loud applause, affected gratitude, and secret jealousy; and his death, which, perhaps, was the effect of passage of a bridge, the Moorish prince, who accompanied the master-general of the West, was suddenly thrown from his horse into the river; the officious haste of the attendants was on the countenance of Stilicho; and while they delayed the necessary assistance, the unfortunate Mascezel was irrecoverably drowned.
Gildo was ready to fight off the invasion with all the forces of Africa. Through his generous gifts and promises, he tried to secure the uncertain loyalty of the Roman soldiers while also drawing in the far-off tribes of Gætulia and Æthiopia. He proudly reviewed an army of seventy thousand men and boasted, with the reckless arrogance that foreshadows disgrace, that his numerous cavalry would stomp the troops of Mascezel underfoot and envelop the cold natives of Gaul and Germany in a cloud of burning sand. However, the Moor who led Honorius's legions was too familiar with his countrymen's ways to have any serious worries about a disorganized and naked mob of Barbarians; their left arms were protected only by a cloak instead of a shield, they were completely unarmed once they threw their javelins, and their horses had never experienced battle. He set up a camp of five thousand veterans directly in front of a larger enemy, and after three days of waiting, he signaled for a full engagement. As Mascezel approached the front with reasonable offers of peace and pardon, he met one of the leading standard-bearers of the Africans and, upon the man's refusal to yield, struck his arm with his sword. The arm and the standard fell under the force of the blow, and the imaginary act of submission was hastily mimicked by all the standards in line. At this, the discontented cohorts shouted the name of their rightful sovereign; the Barbarians, shocked by their Roman allies' defection, scattered in a chaotic flight, and Mascezel achieved an easy and almost bloodless victory. The tyrant fled from the battlefield to the shoreline and jumped into a small boat, hoping to reach a friendly port in the Eastern Empire safely; however, the stubborn wind pushed him back to the harbor of Tabraca, which, like the rest of the province, had accepted the rule of Honorius and the authority of his lieutenant. The locals, wanting to show their repentance and loyalty, seized and imprisoned Gildo in a dungeon; and his own despair spared him from the unbearable torture of facing his injured and victorious brother. The captives and spoils from Africa were presented to the emperor, but even amid prosperity, they still affected to follow the laws of the republic and referred the judgment of the most illustrious criminals to the senate and people of Rome. Their trial was public and solemn; however, the judges, impatient to punish the African magistrates who had cut off the Roman people's supplies, acted within this outdated and precarious jurisdiction. The wealthy and guilty province was oppressed by Imperial ministers, who had a clear interest in increasing the number of Gildo's accomplices; and although an edict from Honorius seemed to limit the malicious activities of informers, a later edict, issued ten years later, continued and renewed the prosecution of the offenses committed during the general rebellion. The supporters of the tyrant who survived the soldiers' initial fury and the judges might find some comfort in the tragic fate of his brother, who could never win forgiveness for his extraordinary services. After finishing a significant war in just one winter, Mascezel was welcomed at the court of Milan with loud applause, feigned gratitude, and secret jealousy. His death, which could have occurred due to a bridge incident, saw the Moorish prince, who was accompanying the master-general of the West, suddenly thrown from his horse into the river; the eager attendants at Stilicho's face delayed providing the necessary help, and the unfortunate Mascezel was drowned without hope of rescue.
The joy of the African triumph was happily connected with the nuptials of the emperor Honorius, and of his cousin Maria, the daughter of Stilicho: and this equal and honorable alliance seemed to invest the powerful minister with the authority of a parent over his submissive pupil. The muse of Claudian was not silent on this propitious day; he sung, in various and lively strains, the happiness of the royal pair; and the glory of the hero, who confirmed their union, and supported their throne. The ancient fables of Greece, which had almost ceased to be the object of religious faith, were saved from oblivion by the genius of poetry. The picture of the Cyprian grove, the seat of harmony and love; the triumphant progress of Venus over her native seas, and the mild influence which her presence diffused in the palace of Milan, express to every age the natural sentiments of the heart, in the just and pleasing language of allegorical fiction. But the amorous impatience which Claudian attributes to the young prince, must excite the smiles of the court; and his beauteous spouse (if she deserved the praise of beauty) had not much to fear or to hope from the passions of her lover. Honorius was only in the fourteenth year of his age; Serena, the mother of his bride, deferred, by art of persuasion, the consummation of the royal nuptials; Maria died a virgin, after she had been ten years a wife; and the chastity of the emperor was secured by the coldness, perhaps, the debility, of his constitution. His subjects, who attentively studied the character of their young sovereign, discovered that Honorius was without passions, and consequently without talents; and that his feeble and languid disposition was alike incapable of discharging the duties of his rank, or of enjoying the pleasures of his age. In his early youth he made some progress in the exercises of riding and drawing the bow: but he soon relinquished these fatiguing occupations, and the amusement of feeding poultry became the serious and daily care of the monarch of the West, who resigned the reins of empire to the firm and skilful hand of his guardian Stilicho. The experience of history will countenance the suspicion that a prince who was born in the purple, received a worse education than the meanest peasant of his dominions; and that the ambitious minister suffered him to attain the age of manhood, without attempting to excite his courage, or to enlighten his understanding. The predecessors of Honorius were accustomed to animate by their example, or at least by their presence, the valor of the legions; and the dates of their laws attest the perpetual activity of their motions through the provinces of the Roman world. But the son of Theodosius passed the slumber of his life, a captive in his palace, a stranger in his country, and the patient, almost the indifferent, spectator of the ruin of the Western empire, which was repeatedly attacked, and finally subverted, by the arms of the Barbarians. In the eventful history of a reign of twenty-eight years, it will seldom be necessary to mention the name of the emperor Honorius.
The joy of Africa's victory was happily linked to the wedding of Emperor Honorius and his cousin Maria, the daughter of Stilicho. This equal and honorable marriage seemed to give the powerful minister a parental authority over his obedient charge. The poet Claudian was not quiet on this fortunate day; he sang, in various lively styles, about the happiness of the royal couple and the glory of the hero who cemented their union and upheld their throne. The old myths of Greece, which had mostly faded from religious belief, were preserved by the artistry of poetry. The image of the Cyprian grove, a place of harmony and love; Venus's triumphant journey across her native seas; and the gentle influence of her presence in the palace of Milan all express to every generation the natural feelings of the heart through beautiful allegorical fiction. However, the youthful impatience Claudian attributes to the young prince would likely make the court smile, and his lovely wife (if she was truly beautiful) had little to fear or hope from her lover's passions. Honorius was only fourteen years old; Serena, the mother of his bride, skillfully delayed the consummation of the royal marriage; Maria died a virgin after being married for ten years; and the emperor's chastity was likely preserved by the coldness, perhaps the weakness, of his nature. His subjects, who closely observed their young ruler, found that Honorius lacked passions and, consequently, talents. His weak and lethargic character made him incapable of fulfilling the responsibilities of his role or enjoying the pleasures of youth. In his early years, he showed some progress in riding and archery but quickly abandoned those tiring pursuits, and the serious, daily concern of the ruler of the West became feeding poultry, allowing his guardian Stilicho to control the empire. History suggests that a prince born into royalty received worse education than the lowest peasant in his realm, and the ambitious minister let him grow to adulthood without attempting to inspire his courage or expand his knowledge. Honorius's predecessors inspired their legions through their actions or at least their presence, and the timing of their laws reflects their constant movement throughout the provinces of the Roman world. But Theodosius's son spent his life in a palace, a captive in his own country, and a patient, almost indifferent, observer of the Western Empire's decline, repeatedly attacked and ultimately destroyed by barbarian forces. In the significant history of his twenty-eight-year reign, it will rarely be necessary to mention the name of Emperor Honorius.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part I.
Revolt Of The Goths.—They Plunder Greece.—Two Great Invasions Of Italy By Alaric And Radagaisus.—They Are Repulsed By Stilicho.—The Germans Overrun Gaul.—Usurpation Of Constantine In The West.—Disgrace And Death Of Stilicho.
Revolt of the Goths.—They loot Greece.—Two major invasions of Italy by Alaric and Radagaisus.—They are pushed back by Stilicho.—The Germans take over Gaul.—Constantine's usurpation in the West.—The disgrace and death of Stilicho.
If the subjects of Rome could be ignorant of their obligations to the great Theodosius, they were too soon convinced, how painfully the spirit and abilities of their deceased emperor had supported the frail and mouldering edifice of the republic. He died in the month of January; and before the end of the winter of the same year, the Gothic nation was in arms. The Barbarian auxiliaries erected their independent standard; and boldly avowed the hostile designs, which they had long cherished in their ferocious minds. Their countrymen, who had been condemned, by the conditions of the last treaty, to a life of tranquility and labor, deserted their farms at the first sound of the trumpet; and eagerly resumed the weapons which they had reluctantly laid down. The barriers of the Danube were thrown open; the savage warriors of Scythia issued from their forests; and the uncommon severity of the winter allowed the poet to remark, "that they rolled their ponderous wagons over the broad and icy back of the indignant river." The unhappy natives of the provinces to the south of the Danube submitted to the calamities, which, in the course of twenty years, were almost grown familiar to their imagination; and the various troops of Barbarians, who gloried in the Gothic name, were irregularly spread from woody shores of Dalmatia, to the walls of Constantinople. The interruption, or at least the diminution, of the subsidy, which the Goths had received from the prudent liberality of Theodosius, was the specious pretence of their revolt: the affront was imbittered by their contempt for the unwarlike sons of Theodosius; and their resentment was inflamed by the weakness, or treachery, of the minister of Arcadius. The frequent visits of Rufinus to the camp of the Barbarians whose arms and apparel he affected to imitate, were considered as a sufficient evidence of his guilty correspondence, and the public enemy, from a motive either of gratitude or of policy, was attentive, amidst the general devastation, to spare the private estates of the unpopular præfect. The Goths, instead of being impelled by the blind and headstrong passions of their chiefs, were now directed by the bold and artful genius of Alaric. That renowned leader was descended from the noble race of the Balti; which yielded only to the royal dignity of the Amali: he had solicited the command of the Roman armies; and the Imperial court provoked him to demonstrate the folly of their refusal, and the importance of their loss. Whatever hopes might be entertained of the conquest of Constantinople, the judicious general soon abandoned an impracticable enterprise. In the midst of a divided court and a discontented people, the emperor Arcadius was terrified by the aspect of the Gothic arms; but the want of wisdom and valor was supplied by the strength of the city; and the fortifications, both of the sea and land, might securely brave the impotent and random darts of the Barbarians. Alaric disdained to trample any longer on the prostrate and ruined countries of Thrace and Dacia, and he resolved to seek a plentiful harvest of fame and riches in a province which had hitherto escaped the ravages of war.
If the people of Rome were unaware of their responsibilities to the great Theodosius, they quickly realized how painfully the spirit and abilities of their late emperor had supported the fragile and decaying structure of the republic. He died in January, and by the end of that same winter, the Gothic nation was mobilizing. The Barbarian allies set up their own banner and boldly declared the hostile plans they had long harbored in their fierce minds. Their compatriots, who had been forced by the terms of the last treaty to live in peace and work, abandoned their farms at the first sound of the trumpet and eagerly took up the weapons they had reluctantly put down. The barriers of the Danube were broken; the savage warriors of Scythia emerged from their forests; and the unusual severity of winter allowed the poet to note, "that they rolled their heavy wagons over the broad and icy back of the enraged river." The unfortunate natives in the provinces south of the Danube surrendered to the disasters that, over the course of twenty years, had almost become familiar to them; and various groups of Barbarians, who took pride in the Gothic name, were irregularly spread from the wooded shores of Dalmatia to the walls of Constantinople. The interruption, or at least the reduction, of the payments the Goths had received from the wise generosity of Theodosius was the convenient excuse for their uprising: the insult was made worse by their contempt for the unwarrior-like sons of Theodosius; and their anger was stoked by the weakness or betrayal of Arcadius's minister. The frequent visits of Rufinus to the camp of the Barbarians, whose arms and clothing he tried to mimic, were seen as clear evidence of his treasonous connection, and the public enemy, whether out of gratitude or strategy, took care, amid the general devastation, to spare the private lands of the unpopular prefect. The Goths, instead of being driven by the reckless and impulsive passions of their leaders, were now guided by the bold and cunning mind of Alaric. That famous leader came from the noble line of the Balti, which only yielded to the royal dignity of the Amali: he had sought command of the Roman armies; and the Imperial court provoked him to showcase the folly of their refusal and the significance of their loss. Whatever hopes might have been held for conquering Constantinople, the wise general soon gave up on an impractical endeavor. In the midst of a divided court and a dissatisfied populace, the emperor Arcadius was frightened by the sight of the Gothic forces; but the lack of wisdom and bravery was compensated for by the strength of the city; and the fortifications, both by sea and land, could confidently withstand the ineffective and random attacks of the Barbarians. Alaric refused to continue trampling on the beaten and devastated lands of Thrace and Dacia, and he decided to seek a rich harvest of fame and wealth in a province that had so far escaped the destruction of war.
The character of the civil and military officers, on whom Rufinus had devolved the government of Greece, confirmed the public suspicion, that he had betrayed the ancient seat of freedom and learning to the Gothic invader. The proconsul Antiochus was the unworthy son of a respectable father; and Gerontius, who commanded the provincial troops, was much better qualified to execute the oppressive orders of a tyrant, than to defend, with courage and ability, a country most remarkably fortified by the hand of nature. Alaric had traversed, without resistance, the plains of Macedonia and Thessaly, as far as the foot of Mount Oeta, a steep and woody range of hills, almost impervious to his cavalry. They stretched from east to west, to the edge of the sea-shore; and left, between the precipice and the Malian Gulf, an interval of three hundred feet, which, in some places, was contracted to a road capable of admitting only a single carriage. In this narrow pass of Thermopylæ, where Leonidas and the three hundred Spartans had gloriously devoted their lives, the Goths might have been stopped, or destroyed, by a skilful general; and perhaps the view of that sacred spot might have kindled some sparks of military ardor in the breasts of the degenerate Greeks. The troops which had been posted to defend the Straits of Thermopylæ, retired, as they were directed, without attempting to disturb the secure and rapid passage of Alaric; and the fertile fields of Phocis and Botia were instantly covered by a deluge of Barbarians who massacred the males of an age to bear arms, and drove away the beautiful females, with the spoil and cattle of the flaming villages. The travellers, who visited Greece several years afterwards, could easily discover the deep and bloody traces of the march of the Goths; and Thebes was less indebted for her preservation to the strength of her seven gates, than to the eager haste of Alaric, who advanced to occupy the city of Athens, and the important harbor of the Piræus. The same impatience urged him to prevent the delay and danger of a siege, by the offer of a capitulation; and as soon as the Athenians heard the voice of the Gothic herald, they were easily persuaded to deliver the greatest part of their wealth, as the ransom of the city of Minerva and its inhabitants. The treaty was ratified by solemn oaths, and observed with mutual fidelity. The Gothic prince, with a small and select train, was admitted within the walls; he indulged himself in the refreshment of the bath, accepted a splendid banquet, which was provided by the magistrate, and affected to show that he was not ignorant of the manners of civilized nations. But the whole territory of Attica, from the promontory of Sunium to the town of Megara, was blasted by his baleful presence; and, if we may use the comparison of a contemporary philosopher, Athens itself resembled the bleeding and empty skin of a slaughtered victim. The distance between Megara and Corinth could not much exceed thirty miles; but the bad road, an expressive name, which it still bears among the Greeks, was, or might easily have been made, impassable for the march of an enemy. The thick and gloomy woods of Mount Cithæron covered the inland country; the Scironian rocks approached the water's edge, and hung over the narrow and winding path, which was confined above six miles along the sea-shore. The passage of those rocks, so infamous in every age, was terminated by the Isthmus of Corinth; and a small a body of firm and intrepid soldiers might have successfully defended a temporary intrenchment of five or six miles from the Ionian to the Ægean Sea. The confidence of the cities of Peloponnesus in their natural rampart, had tempted them to neglect the care of their antique walls; and the avarice of the Roman governors had exhausted and betrayed the unhappy province. Corinth, Argos, Sparta, yielded without resistance to the arms of the Goths; and the most fortunate of the inhabitants were saved, by death, from beholding the slavery of their families and the conflagration of their cities. The vases and statues were distributed among the Barbarians, with more regard to the value of the materials, than to the elegance of the workmanship; the female captives submitted to the laws of war; the enjoyment of beauty was the reward of valor; and the Greeks could not reasonably complain of an abuse which was justified by the example of the heroic times. The descendants of that extraordinary people, who had considered valor and discipline as the walls of Sparta, no longer remembered the generous reply of their ancestors to an invader more formidable than Alaric. "If thou art a god, thou wilt not hurt those who have never injured thee; if thou art a man, advance:—and thou wilt find men equal to thyself." From Thermopylæ to Sparta, the leader of the Goths pursued his victorious march without encountering any mortal antagonists: but one of the advocates of expiring Paganism has confidently asserted, that the walls of Athens were guarded by the goddess Minerva, with her formidable Ægis, and by the angry phantom of Achilles; and that the conqueror was dismayed by the presence of the hostile deities of Greece. In an age of miracles, it would perhaps be unjust to dispute the claim of the historian Zosimus to the common benefit: yet it cannot be dissembled, that the mind of Alaric was ill prepared to receive, either in sleeping or waking visions, the impressions of Greek superstition. The songs of Homer, and the fame of Achilles, had probably never reached the ear of the illiterate Barbarian; and the Christian faith, which he had devoutly embraced, taught him to despise the imaginary deities of Rome and Athens. The invasion of the Goths, instead of vindicating the honor, contributed, at least accidentally, to extirpate the last remains of Paganism: and the mysteries of Ceres, which had subsisted eighteen hundred years, did not survive the destruction of Eleusis, and the calamities of Greece.
The character of the civil and military officers, to whom Rufinus had handed over the governance of Greece, confirmed public suspicion that he had betrayed the historic center of freedom and learning to the Gothic invader. The proconsul Antiochus was an unworthy son of a respectable father, and Gerontius, who commanded the provincial troops, was far better at carrying out the oppressive orders of a tyrant than defending a country that was naturally fortified. Alaric crossed the plains of Macedonia and Thessaly without any resistance, reaching the foot of Mount Oeta, a steep and wooded range of hills that was almost impossible for his cavalry to navigate. This range stretched from east to west to the edge of the sea and left a gap of three hundred feet between the cliff and the Malian Gulf, which at some points narrowed to a road that could only fit a single carriage. In this narrow pass of Thermopylæ, where Leonidas and the three hundred Spartans bravely sacrificed their lives, the Goths could have been stopped or defeated by a skilled general. Perhaps just seeing that sacred spot could have reignited some military spirit in the hearts of the weakened Greeks. The troops assigned to defend the Straits of Thermopylæ retreated as instructed, without attempting to disrupt Alaric's secure and quick passage. The fertile lands of Phocis and Boeotia were quickly overwhelmed by a flood of Barbarians who slaughtered all able-bodied men and took away lovely women along with the goods and livestock from the burning villages. Travelers who ventured to Greece several years later could easily spot the deep and bloody traces of the Goths' march, and Thebes owed her survival less to the strength of her seven gates than to Alaric's hurried desire to occupy Athens and the key harbor of Piræus. The same impatience compelled him to avoid the potential wait and danger of a siege by proposing a capitulation; and as soon as the Athenians heard the Gothic herald, they were readily convinced to hand over most of their wealth as the ransom for the city of Minerva and its people. The agreement was confirmed with solemn oaths and honored with mutual loyalty. The Gothic prince, along with a small, select group, was allowed to enter the city walls; he enjoyed the luxury of a bath, accepted a lavish banquet prepared by the magistrate, and pretended to show he was familiar with the customs of civilized societies. However, the entire region of Attica, from the promontory of Sunium to the town of Megara, suffered from his dreadful presence; and if we may borrow a comparison from a contemporary philosopher, Athens itself resembled the bloodied and hollow hide of a slaughtered animal. The distance between Megara and Corinth was not much greater than thirty miles; but the bad road, a fitting name that it still bears among the Greeks, was or could easily have been made impassable for an enemy's march. The dense, shadowy woods of Mount Cithæron covered the inland area; the Scironian cliffs reached the water's edge and loomed over a narrow, twisting path that ran along the sea for more than six miles. The infamous passage through those rocks was completed at the Isthmus of Corinth, and a small group of steadfast and fearless soldiers could have successfully defended a temporary barricade spanning five or six miles from the Ionian to the Ægean Sea. The cities of Peloponnesus, confident in their natural defenses, had neglected to maintain their ancient walls, and the greed of Roman governors had drained and betrayed the unfortunate province. Corinth, Argos, and Sparta fell without resistance to the Gothic forces, and the luckiest of the inhabitants were spared, through death, from witnessing their families’ enslavement and the burning of their cities. The vases and statues were distributed among the Barbarians, prioritized more for the value of their materials than the artistry involved; the female captives were subject to the rules of war; the enjoyment of beauty was the reward for bravery; and the Greeks could hardly complain about an injustice that was justified by examples from heroic times. The descendants of that remarkable people, who viewed bravery and discipline as the strength of Sparta, had forgotten their ancestors' noble response to a more formidable invader than Alaric: "If you are a god, you will not harm those who have never wronged you; if you are a man, come forward—and you will find men equal to yourself." From Thermopylæ to Sparta, the leader of the Goths continued his victorious march without facing any human enemies. Still, one proponent of fading Paganism boldly claimed that the walls of Athens were defended by the goddess Minerva, with her powerful Ægis, and the furious ghost of Achilles; and that the conqueror was intimidated by the presence of the hostile gods of Greece. In an age of miracles, it may seem unfair to challenge the historian Zosimus's claim to the shared benefit; yet, it cannot be denied that Alaric was poorly equipped to perceive, whether in dreams or wakefulness, the influences of Greek superstition. The songs of Homer and the renown of Achilles probably never reached the ears of the uneducated Barbarian; and the Christian faith that he had faithfully adopted taught him to scorn the imaginary deities of Rome and Athens. The invasion of the Goths, rather than restoring honor, unintentionally contributed to the eradication of the final remnants of Paganism; and the mysteries of Ceres, which had endured for eighteen hundred years, did not survive the destruction of Eleusis and the calamities that befell Greece.
The last hope of a people who could no longer depend on their arms, their gods, or their sovereign, was placed in the powerful assistance of the general of the West; and Stilicho, who had not been permitted to repulse, advanced to chastise, the invaders of Greece. A numerous fleet was equipped in the ports of Italy; and the troops, after a short and prosperous navigation over the Ionian Sea, were safely disembarked on the isthmus, near the ruins of Corinth. The woody and mountainous country of Arcadia, the fabulous residence of Pan and the Dryads, became the scene of a long and doubtful conflict between the two generals not unworthy of each other. The skill and perseverance of the Roman at length prevailed; and the Goths, after sustaining a considerable loss from disease and desertion, gradually retreated to the lofty mountain of Pholoe, near the sources of the Peneus, and on the frontiers of Elis; a sacred country, which had formerly been exempted from the calamities of war. The camp of the Barbarians was immediately besieged; the waters of the river were diverted into another channel; and while they labored under the intolerable pressure of thirst and hunger, a strong line of circumvallation was formed to prevent their escape. After these precautions, Stilicho, too confident of victory, retired to enjoy his triumph, in the theatrical games, and lascivious dances, of the Greeks; his soldiers, deserting their standards, spread themselves over the country of their allies, which they stripped of all that had been saved from the rapacious hands of the enemy. Alaric appears to have seized the favorable moment to execute one of those hardy enterprises, in which the abilities of a general are displayed with more genuine lustre, than in the tumult of a day of battle. To extricate himself from the prison of Peloponnesus, it was necessary that he should pierce the intrenchments which surrounded his camp; that he should perform a difficult and dangerous march of thirty miles, as far as the Gulf of Corinth; and that he should transport his troops, his captives, and his spoil, over an arm of the sea, which, in the narrow interval between Rhium and the opposite shore, is at least half a mile in breadth. The operations of Alaric must have been secret, prudent, and rapid; since the Roman general was confounded by the intelligence, that the Goths, who had eluded his efforts, were in full possession of the important province of Epirus. This unfortunate delay allowed Alaric sufficient time to conclude the treaty, which he secretly negotiated, with the ministers of Constantinople. The apprehension of a civil war compelled Stilicho to retire, at the haughty mandate of his rivals, from the dominions of Arcadius; and he respected, in the enemy of Rome, the honorable character of the ally and servant of the emperor of the East.
The last hope of a people who could no longer rely on their weapons, their gods, or their ruler was placed in the strong support of the general from the West; Stilicho, who had not been allowed to fight back, moved to punish the invaders of Greece. A large fleet was prepared in the ports of Italy; and the troops, after a brief and successful journey across the Ionian Sea, safely landed on the isthmus near the ruins of Corinth. The wooded and mountainous region of Arcadia, the mythical home of Pan and the Dryads, became the setting for a long and uncertain battle between the two worthy generals. Eventually, the skill and determination of the Roman prevailed; and the Goths, after suffering significant losses from disease and desertion, gradually retreated to the high mountain of Pholoe, near the sources of the Peneus, on the borders of Elis; a sacred land that had previously been spared from the horrors of war. The Barbarians' camp was quickly besieged; the waters of the river were redirected; and while they struggled under the unbearable conditions of thirst and hunger, a strong line of fortifications was built to block their escape. After taking these precautions, Stilicho, overly confident of victory, stepped back to enjoy his triumph at the theatrical games and sensual dances of the Greeks; his soldiers abandoned their standards and roamed the territory of their allies, stripping it of everything that had been saved from the greedy hands of the enemy. Alaric seemed to seize the perfect moment to carry out one of those bold moves where a general's skills shine more brightly than in the chaos of battle. To escape the confines of Peloponnesus, he needed to break through the defenses surrounding his camp; undertake a challenging and risky 30-mile march to the Gulf of Corinth; and transport his troops, captives, and loot across a stretch of sea that is at least half a mile wide at its narrowest point between Rhium and the opposite shore. Alaric's movements must have been secretive, careful, and swift, as the Roman general was stunned by the news that the Goths, who had evaded his efforts, were fully in control of the important province of Epirus. This unfortunate delay gave Alaric enough time to finalize the secret treaty he was negotiating with the officials of Constantinople. The fear of a civil war forced Stilicho to leave, at the arrogant command of his rivals, from the territories of Arcadius; and he respected in the enemy of Rome the honorable role of ally and servant to the emperor of the East.
A Grecian philosopher, who visited Constantinople soon after the death of Theodosius, published his liberal opinions concerning the duties of kings, and the state of the Roman republic. Synesius observes, and deplores, the fatal abuse, which the imprudent bounty of the late emperor had introduced into the military service. The citizens and subjects had purchased an exemption from the indispensable duty of defending their country; which was supported by the arms of Barbarian mercenaries. The fugitives of Scythia were permitted to disgrace the illustrious dignities of the empire; their ferocious youth, who disdained the salutary restraint of laws, were more anxious to acquire the riches, than to imitate the arts, of a people, the object of their contempt and hatred; and the power of the Goths was the stone of Tantalus, perpetually suspended over the peace and safety of the devoted state. The measures which Synesius recommends, are the dictates of a bold and generous patriot. He exhorts the emperor to revive the courage of his subjects, by the example of manly virtue; to banish luxury from the court and from the camp; to substitute, in the place of the Barbarian mercenaries, an army of men, interested in the defence of their laws and of their property; to force, in such a moment of public danger, the mechanic from his shop, and the philosopher from his school; to rouse the indolent citizen from his dream of pleasure, and to arm, for the protection of agriculture, the hands of the laborious husbandman. At the head of such troops, who might deserve the name, and would display the spirit, of Romans, he animates the son of Theodosius to encounter a race of Barbarians, who were destitute of any real courage; and never to lay down his arms, till he had chased them far away into the solitudes of Scythia; or had reduced them to the state of ignominious servitude, which the Lacedæmonians formerly imposed on the captive Helots. The court of Arcadius indulged the zeal, applauded the eloquence, and neglected the advice, of Synesius. Perhaps the philosopher who addresses the emperor of the East in the language of reason and virtue, which he might have used to a Spartan king, had not condescended to form a practicable scheme, consistent with the temper, and circumstances, of a degenerate age. Perhaps the pride of the ministers, whose business was seldom interrupted by reflection, might reject, as wild and visionary, every proposal, which exceeded the measure of their capacity, and deviated from the forms and precedents of office. While the oration of Synesius, and the downfall of the Barbarians, were the topics of popular conversation, an edict was published at Constantinople, which declared the promotion of Alaric to the rank of master-general of the Eastern Illyricum. The Roman provincials, and the allies, who had respected the faith of treaties, were justly indignant, that the ruin of Greece and Epirus should be so liberally rewarded. The Gothic conqueror was received as a lawful magistrate, in the cities which he had so lately besieged. The fathers, whose sons he had massacred, the husbands, whose wives he had violated, were subject to his authority; and the success of his rebellion encouraged the ambition of every leader of the foreign mercenaries. The use to which Alaric applied his new command, distinguishes the firm and judicious character of his policy. He issued his orders to the four magazines and manufactures of offensive and defensive arms, Margus, Ratiaria, Naissus, and Thessalonica, to provide his troops with an extraordinary supply of shields, helmets, swords, and spears; the unhappy provincials were compelled to forge the instruments of their own destruction; and the Barbarians removed the only defect which had sometimes disappointed the efforts of their courage. The birth of Alaric, the glory of his past exploits, and the confidence in his future designs, insensibly united the body of the nation under his victorious standard; and, with the unanimous consent of the Barbarian chieftains, the master-general of Illyricum was elevated, according to ancient custom, on a shield, and solemnly proclaimed king of the Visigoths. Armed with this double power, seated on the verge of the two empires, he alternately sold his deceitful promises to the courts of Arcadius and Honorius; till he declared and executed his resolution of invading the dominions of the West. The provinces of Europe which belonged to the Eastern emperor, were already exhausted; those of Asia were inaccessible; and the strength of Constantinople had resisted his attack. But he was tempted by the fame, the beauty, the wealth of Italy, which he had twice visited; and he secretly aspired to plant the Gothic standard on the walls of Rome, and to enrich his army with the accumulated spoils of three hundred triumphs.
A Greek philosopher who visited Constantinople shortly after the death of Theodosius published his progressive views on the responsibilities of kings and the state of the Roman republic. Synesius notes and regrets the harmful abuse that the reckless generosity of the late emperor had brought into the military. Citizens and subjects had paid for an exemption from the essential duty of defending their country, which was instead backed by Barbarian mercenaries. Scythian refugees were allowed to disgrace the esteemed positions of the empire; their fierce youth, who rejected the beneficial restrictions of laws, were more focused on acquiring wealth than learning the skills of a culture they looked down upon and hated. The power of the Goths loomed like a Tantalus stone, perpetually threatening the peace and safety of the beleaguered state. The actions Synesius recommends reflect a bold and noble patriotism. He urges the emperor to inspire the courage of his citizens through exemplary virtue, to eliminate luxury from both the court and the military, to replace the Barbarian mercenaries with an army of individuals invested in protecting their laws and property, to compel the tradesman from his workshop and the philosopher from his classroom, to awaken the idle citizen from his pleasures, and to arm the hardworking farmer to safeguard agriculture. At the forefront of such an army, which would embody the true spirit of Romans, he encourages the son of Theodosius to confront a group of Barbarians lacking real bravery, and not to lay down his arms until he had driven them far back into the wilderness of Scythia or reduced them to the shameful servitude that the Spartans once imposed on the Helots. The court of Arcadius embraced Synesius's passion, admired his eloquence, and ignored his advice. Perhaps the philosopher addressing the Eastern emperor with the reasoning and values suitable for a Spartan king failed to create a practical plan that aligned with the attitudes and realities of a declining age. Perhaps the arrogance of the ministers, whose work was rarely interrupted by contemplation, dismissed any suggestions that surpassed their limited understanding or deviated from established norms. While Synesius's speech and the defeat of the Barbarians were hot topics among the public, an edict was issued in Constantinople announcing Alaric's promotion to master-general of Eastern Illyricum. The Roman provincials and allies, who had respected their treaties, were justifiably outraged that the destruction of Greece and Epirus was so generously rewarded. The Gothic conqueror was accepted as a legitimate authority in the cities he had recently attacked. The fathers whose sons he had slain and the husbands whose wives he had assaulted were now under his control, and the success of his rebellion fueled the ambitions of every leader of foreign mercenaries. The way Alaric used his new position shows the firm and wise nature of his strategy. He instructed the four depots and factories for weapons in Margus, Ratiaria, Naissus, and Thessalonica to supply his troops with an extraordinary stockpile of shields, helmets, swords, and spears; the unfortunate provincials were forced to manufacture the tools for their own downfall; and the Barbarians corrected the only flaw that had sometimes hindered their attempts. Alaric's birth, the glory of his past achievements, and confidence in his future plans slowly united the nation under his victorious banner; with the unanimous support of the Barbarian leaders, the master-general of Illyricum was raised on a shield and officially proclaimed king of the Visigoths. Armed with this dual authority, standing on the edge of the two empires, he alternately sold his deceptive promises to the courts of Arcadius and Honorius until he announced and acted on his decision to invade the West. The Eastern emperor’s provinces in Europe were already drained; those in Asia were unreachable; and Constantinople had withstood his assaults. However, he was lured by the fame, beauty, and wealth of Italy, which he had visited twice; secretly, he aspired to plant the Gothic banner on the walls of Rome and to enrich his army with the accumulated spoils of three hundred triumphs.
The scarcity of facts, and the uncertainty of dates, oppose our attempts to describe the circumstances of the first invasion of Italy by the arms of Alaric. His march, perhaps from Thessalonica, through the warlike and hostile country of Pannonia, as far as the foot of the Julian Alps; his passage of those mountains, which were strongly guarded by troops and intrenchments; the siege of Aquileia, and the conquest of the provinces of Istria and Venetia, appear to have employed a considerable time. Unless his operations were extremely cautious and slow, the length of the interval would suggest a probable suspicion, that the Gothic king retreated towards the banks of the Danube; and reënforced his army with fresh swarms of Barbarians, before he again attempted to penetrate into the heart of Italy. Since the public and important events escape the diligence of the historian, he may amuse himself with contemplating, for a moment, the influence of the arms of Alaric on the fortunes of two obscure individuals, a presbyter of Aquileia and a husbandman of Verona. The learned Rufinus, who was summoned by his enemies to appear before a Roman synod, wisely preferred the dangers of a besieged city; and the Barbarians, who furiously shook the walls of Aquileia, might save him from the cruel sentence of another heretic, who, at the request of the same bishops, was severely whipped, and condemned to perpetual exile on a desert island. The old man, who had passed his simple and innocent life in the neighborhood of Verona, was a stranger to the quarrels both of kings and of bishops; his pleasures, his desires, his knowledge, were confined within the little circle of his paternal farm; and a staff supported his aged steps, on the same ground where he had sported in his infancy. Yet even this humble and rustic felicity (which Claudian describes with so much truth and feeling) was still exposed to the undistinguishing rage of war. His trees, his old contemporary trees, must blaze in the conflagration of the whole country; a detachment of Gothic cavalry might sweep away his cottage and his family; and the power of Alaric could destroy this happiness, which he was not able either to taste or to bestow. "Fame," says the poet, "encircling with terror her gloomy wings, proclaimed the march of the Barbarian army, and filled Italy with consternation:" the apprehensions of each individual were increased in just proportion to the measure of his fortune: and the most timid, who had already embarked their valuable effects, meditated their escape to the Island of Sicily, or the African coast. The public distress was aggravated by the fears and reproaches of superstition. Every hour produced some horrid tale of strange and portentous accidents; the Pagans deplored the neglect of omens, and the interruption of sacrifices; but the Christians still derived some comfort from the powerful intercession of the saints and martyrs.
The lack of reliable facts and uncertain timelines make it hard for us to accurately describe the events surrounding Alaric's first invasion of Italy. His journey, possibly starting from Thessalonica and moving through the hostile land of Pannonia to the base of the Julian Alps; his crossing of those mountains, which were strongly defended; the siege of Aquileia, and the capture of the provinces of Istria and Venetia, seem to have taken a significant amount of time. Unless his movements were very careful and slow, the duration of the campaign raises the possibility that the Gothic king retreated to the banks of the Danube to reinforce his army with fresh groups of Barbarians before attempting to enter Italy again. While important public events often escape a historian's attention, he might take a moment to consider how Alaric's actions impacted the lives of two individuals: a presbyter from Aquileia and a farmer from Verona. The educated Rufinus, called by his enemies to attend a Roman synod, wisely chose the risks of a besieged city over those of his situation; and the Barbarians shaking the walls of Aquileia might save him from the harsh punishment meted out to another heretic, who, at the request of the same bishops, was flogged and exiled to a desolate island. The old man, who had lived a simple and innocent life near Verona, was unaware of the disputes between kings and bishops; his joys, desires, and knowledge were limited to the small world of his family farm, and a staff helped him walk on the same land where he had played as a child. Yet even this modest rural happiness—so accurately described by Claudian—was still at the mercy of the indiscriminate violence of war. His trees, his old familiar trees, would burn in the widespread devastation; a group of Gothic cavalry could easily destroy his cottage and family, while Alaric's power could crush this happiness he neither experienced nor could share. "Fame," the poet says, "surrounding with terror her dark wings, announced the march of the Barbarian army, and filled Italy with fear": the worries of each person grew in proportion to their wealth, and the most fearful who had already packed their valuables contemplated fleeing to Sicily or the coast of Africa. Public suffering was worsened by fears and the accusations of superstition. Every hour brought some horrific news of strange and unnatural events; the Pagans mourned the neglect of omens and the interruption of sacrifices, while Christians found some solace in the powerful intercession of saints and martyrs.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part II.
The emperor Honorius was distinguished, above his subjects, by the preeminence of fear, as well as of rank. The pride and luxury in which he was educated, had not allowed him to suspect, that there existed on the earth any power presumptuous enough to invade the repose of the successor of Augustus. The arts of flattery concealed the impending danger, till Alaric approached the palace of Milan. But when the sound of war had awakened the young emperor, instead of flying to arms with the spirit, or even the rashness, of his age, he eagerly listened to those timid counsellors, who proposed to convey his sacred person, and his faithful attendants, to some secure and distant station in the provinces of Gaul. Stilicho alone had courage and authority to resist his disgraceful measure, which would have abandoned Rome and Italy to the Barbarians; but as the troops of the palace had been lately detached to the Rhætian frontier, and as the resource of new levies was slow and precarious, the general of the West could only promise, that if the court of Milan would maintain their ground during his absence, he would soon return with an army equal to the encounter of the Gothic king. Without losing a moment, (while each moment was so important to the public safety,) Stilicho hastily embarked on the Larian Lake, ascended the mountains of ice and snow, amidst the severity of an Alpine winter, and suddenly repressed, by his unexpected presence, the enemy, who had disturbed the tranquillity of Rhætia. The Barbarians, perhaps some tribes of the Alemanni, respected the firmness of a chief, who still assumed the language of command; and the choice which he condescended to make, of a select number of their bravest youth, was considered as a mark of his esteem and favor. The cohorts, who were delivered from the neighboring foe, diligently repaired to the Imperial standard; and Stilicho issued his orders to the most remote troops of the West, to advance, by rapid marches, to the defence of Honorius and of Italy. The fortresses of the Rhine were abandoned; and the safety of Gaul was protected only by the faith of the Germans, and the ancient terror of the Roman name. Even the legion, which had been stationed to guard the wall of Britain against the Caledonians of the North, was hastily recalled; and a numerous body of the cavalry of the Alani was persuaded to engage in the service of the emperor, who anxiously expected the return of his general. The prudence and vigor of Stilicho were conspicuous on this occasion, which revealed, at the same time, the weakness of the falling empire. The legions of Rome, which had long since languished in the gradual decay of discipline and courage, were exterminated by the Gothic and civil wars; and it was found impossible, without exhausting and exposing the provinces, to assemble an army for the defence of Italy.
The emperor Honorius was marked, above his subjects, by a mix of fear and rank. The pride and luxury he grew up in made him unaware that any power was bold enough to disturb the peace of the successor to Augustus. The flattery around him hid the looming threat until Alaric approached the palace in Milan. But when the sounds of war stirred the young emperor, instead of taking up arms with the enthusiasm or even the recklessness typical of his age, he eagerly listened to his fearful advisors, who suggested relocating him and his loyal followers to a safe and distant location in Gaul. Only Stilicho had the courage and authority to oppose this disgraceful plan, which would have left Rome and Italy vulnerable to the Barbarians. However, since the palace troops had recently been sent to the Rhætian border and new recruits were scarce and unreliable, the general of the West could only promise that if the court in Milan could hold on during his absence, he would quickly return with an army ready to face the Gothic king. Without wasting a moment—each second crucial for the public's safety—Stilicho hurriedly set out on Lake Lario, climbed the icy mountains amid the harsh Alpine winter, and suddenly turned back the enemy, who had disrupted the peace of Rhætia, with his unexpected arrival. The Barbarians, possibly some tribes of the Alemanni, respected the strength of a leader who still commanded with authority; and the choice he made to select a few of their bravest youth was seen as a sign of his respect and favor. The troops, freed from the nearby threat, rapidly gathered around the Imperial standard, while Stilicho ordered the far-off Western forces to march quickly to defend Honorius and Italy. The fortresses along the Rhine were left unguarded, and Gaul’s safety relied solely on the loyalty of the Germans and the long-standing fear of the Roman name. Even the legion that had been stationed to protect the wall of Britain against the Northern Caledonians was quickly recalled, and a large contingent of Alani cavalry was persuaded to join the service of the emperor, who anxiously awaited his general's return. The prudence and strength of Stilicho were evident during this moment, highlighting the empire's decline. The Roman legions, which had long been weakened by a gradual loss of discipline and bravery, were decimated by Gothic and civil wars, making it impossible to gather a defensive force for Italy without draining and endangering the provinces.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part III.
When Stilicho seemed to abandon his sovereign in the unguarded palace of Milan, he had probably calculated the term of his absence, the distance of the enemy, and the obstacles that might retard their march. He principally depended on the rivers of Italy, the Adige, the Mincius, the Oglio, and the Addua, which, in the winter or spring, by the fall of rains, or by the melting of the snows, are commonly swelled into broad and impetuous torrents. But the season happened to be remarkably dry: and the Goths could traverse, without impediment, the wide and stony beds, whose centre was faintly marked by the course of a shallow stream. The bridge and passage of the Addua were secured by a strong detachment of the Gothic army; and as Alaric approached the walls, or rather the suburbs, of Milan, he enjoyed the proud satisfaction of seeing the emperor of the Romans fly before him. Honorius, accompanied by a feeble train of statesmen and eunuchs, hastily retreated towards the Alps, with a design of securing his person in the city of Arles, which had often been the royal residence of his predecessors. But Honorius had scarcely passed the Po, before he was overtaken by the speed of the Gothic cavalry; since the urgency of the danger compelled him to seek a temporary shelter within the fortifications of Asta, a town of Liguria or Piemont, situate on the banks of the Tanarus. The siege of an obscure place, which contained so rich a prize, and seemed incapable of a long resistance, was instantly formed, and indefatigably pressed, by the king of the Goths; and the bold declaration, which the emperor might afterwards make, that his breast had never been susceptible of fear, did not probably obtain much credit, even in his own court. In the last, and almost hopeless extremity, after the Barbarians had already proposed the indignity of a capitulation, the Imperial captive was suddenly relieved by the fame, the approach, and at length the presence, of the hero, whom he had so long expected. At the head of a chosen and intrepid vanguard, Stilicho swam the stream of the Addua, to gain the time which he must have lost in the attack of the bridge; the passage of the Po was an enterprise of much less hazard and difficulty; and the successful action, in which he cut his way through the Gothic camp under the walls of Asta, revived the hopes, and vindicated the honor, of Rome. Instead of grasping the fruit of his victory, the Barbarian was gradually invested, on every side, by the troops of the West, who successively issued through all the passes of the Alps; his quarters were straitened; his convoys were intercepted; and the vigilance of the Romans prepared to form a chain of fortifications, and to besiege the lines of the besiegers. A military council was assembled of the long-haired chiefs of the Gothic nation; of aged warriors, whose bodies were wrapped in furs, and whose stern countenances were marked with honorable wounds. They weighed the glory of persisting in their attempt against the advantage of securing their plunder; and they recommended the prudent measure of a seasonable retreat. In this important debate, Alaric displayed the spirit of the conqueror of Rome; and after he had reminded his countrymen of their achievements and of their designs, he concluded his animating speech by the solemn and positive assurance that he was resolved to find in Italy either a kingdom or a grave.
When Stilicho seemed to abandon his ruler in the unprotected palace of Milan, he likely calculated how long he could be away, the distance of the enemy, and the obstacles that might slow their advance. He mainly relied on Italy’s rivers—the Adige, the Mincius, the Oglio, and the Addua—which usually swell into wide, rushing torrents in winter or spring, thanks to the rainfall or melting snow. But the season turned out to be unusually dry, allowing the Goths to easily cross the wide, rocky riverbeds, where the center was only faintly marked by a shallow stream. The bridge and the crossing of the Addua were secured by a strong detachment of the Gothic army, and as Alaric neared the walls, or more accurately, the outskirts, of Milan, he took pride in seeing the Roman emperor flee before him. Honorius, accompanied by a weak entourage of politicians and eunuchs, quickly retreated toward the Alps, aiming to secure himself in the city of Arles, which had often been the royal residence of his predecessors. However, he had barely crossed the Po when the swift Gothic cavalry caught up with him, forcing him to seek temporary refuge within the walls of Asta, a town in Liguria or Piedmont situated on the banks of the Tanarus. The siege of this obscure place, which contained such a valuable prize and seemed incapable of long resistance, was immediately established and relentlessly pursued by the king of the Goths. The bold claim that Honorius might later make, that he had never known fear, probably did not earn much belief, even in his own court. In the last, nearly hopeless moment, after the Barbarians had already suggested the shame of surrender, the Imperial captive was suddenly rescued by the reputation, the approach, and finally the presence of the hero he had long awaited. Leading a select and fearless vanguard, Stilicho swam across the Addua to save time that he would have lost attacking the bridge; crossing the Po was a much less risky task; and the successful maneuver, where he carved a path through the Gothic camp outside Asta, renewed hopes and restored the honor of Rome. Instead of enjoying the rewards of his victory, the Barbarian found himself slowly surrounded on all sides by the Western troops who emerged one after another from the Alpine passes; his camps were tightened; his supply lines were cut; and the Romans, ever watchful, prepared to create a network of fortifications and to besiege the besiegers. A military council was gathered with the long-haired leaders of the Gothic nation, old warriors wrapped in furs, their stern faces bearing honorable wounds. They debated the glory of continuing their assault against the benefit of securing their loot and recommended a wise retreat. During this crucial discussion, Alaric displayed the spirit of the conqueror of Rome; after reminding his comrades of their victories and goals, he concluded his motivating speech with the solemn assertion that he was determined to find either a kingdom or a grave in Italy.
The loose discipline of the Barbarians always exposed them to the danger of a surprise; but, instead of choosing the dissolute hours of riot and intemperance, Stilicho resolved to attack the Christian Goths, whilst they were devoutly employed in celebrating the festival of Easter. The execution of the stratagem, or, as it was termed by the clergy of the sacrilege, was intrusted to Saul, a Barbarian and a Pagan, who had served, however, with distinguished reputation among the veteran generals of Theodosius. The camp of the Goths, which Alaric had pitched in the neighborhood of Pollentia, was thrown into confusion by the sudden and impetuous charge of the Imperial cavalry; but, in a few moments, the undaunted genius of their leader gave them an order, and a field of battle; and, as soon as they had recovered from their astonishment, the pious confidence, that the God of the Christians would assert their cause, added new strength to their native valor. In this engagement, which was long maintained with equal courage and success, the chief of the Alani, whose diminutive and savage form concealed a magnanimous soul approved his suspected loyalty, by the zeal with which he fought, and fell, in the service of the republic; and the fame of this gallant Barbarian has been imperfectly preserved in the verses of Claudian, since the poet, who celebrates his virtue, has omitted the mention of his name. His death was followed by the flight and dismay of the squadrons which he commanded; and the defeat of the wing of cavalry might have decided the victory of Alaric, if Stilicho had not immediately led the Roman and Barbarian infantry to the attack. The skill of the general, and the bravery of the soldiers, surmounted every obstacle. In the evening of the bloody day, the Goths retreated from the field of battle; the intrenchments of their camp were forced, and the scene of rapine and slaughter made some atonement for the calamities which they had inflicted on the subjects of the empire. The magnificent spoils of Corinth and Argos enriched the veterans of the West; the captive wife of Alaric, who had impatiently claimed his promise of Roman jewels and Patrician handmaids, was reduced to implore the mercy of the insulting foe; and many thousand prisoners, released from the Gothic chains, dispersed through the provinces of Italy the praises of their heroic deliverer. The triumph of Stilicho was compared by the poet, and perhaps by the public, to that of Marius; who, in the same part of Italy, had encountered and destroyed another army of Northern Barbarians. The huge bones, and the empty helmets, of the Cimbri and of the Goths, would easily be confounded by succeeding generations; and posterity might erect a common trophy to the memory of the two most illustrious generals, who had vanquished, on the same memorable ground, the two most formidable enemies of Rome.
The relaxed discipline of the Barbarians always left them vulnerable to surprise attacks; however, instead of waiting for their wild and drunken celebrations, Stilicho decided to strike the Christian Goths while they were earnestly observing the Easter festival. The execution of this plan, which the clergy labeled sacrilegious, was entrusted to Saul, a Barbarian and Pagan who, nonetheless, had served with great distinction among Theodosius’s veteran generals. The Goths’ camp, set up by Alaric near Pollentia, was thrown into chaos by the sudden and fierce charge of the Imperial cavalry; but within moments, the fearless leadership of their commander gave them orders and a battleground. Once they recovered from their shock, their faith that the God of Christians would support their cause added new strength to their natural bravery. In this battle, which was fiercely contested with equal courage on both sides, the leader of the Alani—whose small and savage appearance masked a noble spirit—proved his loyalty by fighting with fervor and fell in service to the republic; the accomplishments of this brave Barbarian have been partially preserved in Claudian’s verses, as the poet, while celebrating his virtue, unfortunately did not mention his name. His death led to the flight and panic of the troops he commanded; and the defeat of the cavalry wing might have secured Alaric’s victory if Stilicho hadn’t quickly led the Roman and Barbarian infantry into the attack. The general’s skill and the soldiers' bravery overcame every challenge. By evening, the Goths had retreated from the battlefield; their camp's defenses were breached, and the looting and slaughter provided a measure of retribution for the suffering they had caused the empire's subjects. The splendid spoils from Corinth and Argos enriched the veterans of the West; Alaric's captive wife, who had eagerly awaited his promise of Roman jewels and noble maidservants, was reduced to begging for mercy from her taunting captors; and many thousands of prisoners freed from Gothic chains spread the praises of their heroic rescuer throughout the provinces of Italy. The triumph of Stilicho was likened by the poet—and perhaps by the public—to that of Marius, who, in the same region of Italy, had faced and defeated another army of Northern Barbarians. The massive bones and empty helmets of the Cimbri and the Goths could easily be confused by future generations, and posterity might erect a shared monument in honor of the two most renowned generals who had triumphed, on the same significant ground, over Rome’s two most formidable foes.
The eloquence of Claudian has celebrated, with lavish applause, the victory of Pollentia, one of the most glorious days in the life of his patron; but his reluctant and partial muse bestows more genuine praise on the character of the Gothic king. His name is, indeed, branded with the reproachful epithets of pirate and robber, to which the conquerors of every age are so justly entitled; but the poet of Stilicho is compelled to acknowledge that Alaric possessed the invincible temper of mind, which rises superior to every misfortune, and derives new resources from adversity. After the total defeat of his infantry, he escaped, or rather withdrew, from the field of battle, with the greatest part of his cavalry entire and unbroken. Without wasting a moment to lament the irreparable loss of so many brave companions, he left his victorious enemy to bind in chains the captive images of a Gothic king; and boldly resolved to break through the unguarded passes of the Apennine, to spread desolation over the fruitful face of Tuscany, and to conquer or die before the gates of Rome. The capital was saved by the active and incessant diligence of Stilicho; but he respected the despair of his enemy; and, instead of committing the fate of the republic to the chance of another battle, he proposed to purchase the absence of the Barbarians. The spirit of Alaric would have rejected such terms, the permission of a retreat, and the offer of a pension, with contempt and indignation; but he exercised a limited and precarious authority over the independent chieftains who had raised him, for their service, above the rank of his equals; they were still less disposed to follow an unsuccessful general, and many of them were tempted to consult their interest by a private negotiation with the minister of Honorius. The king submitted to the voice of his people, ratified the treaty with the empire of the West, and repassed the Po with the remains of the flourishing army which he had led into Italy. A considerable part of the Roman forces still continued to attend his motions; and Stilicho, who maintained a secret correspondence with some of the Barbarian chiefs, was punctually apprised of the designs that were formed in the camp and council of Alaric. The king of the Goths, ambitious to signalize his retreat by some splendid achievement, had resolved to occupy the important city of Verona, which commands the principal passage of the Rhætian Alps; and, directing his march through the territories of those German tribes, whose alliance would restore his exhausted strength, to invade, on the side of the Rhine, the wealthy and unsuspecting provinces of Gaul. Ignorant of the treason which had already betrayed his bold and judicious enterprise, he advanced towards the passes of the mountains, already possessed by the Imperial troops; where he was exposed, almost at the same instant, to a general attack in the front, on his flanks, and in the rear. In this bloody action, at a small distance from the walls of Verona, the loss of the Goths was not less heavy than that which they had sustained in the defeat of Pollentia; and their valiant king, who escaped by the swiftness of his horse, must either have been slain or made prisoner, if the hasty rashness of the Alani had not disappointed the measures of the Roman general. Alaric secured the remains of his army on the adjacent rocks; and prepared himself, with undaunted resolution, to maintain a siege against the superior numbers of the enemy, who invested him on all sides. But he could not oppose the destructive progress of hunger and disease; nor was it possible for him to check the continual desertion of his impatient and capricious Barbarians. In this extremity he still found resources in his own courage, or in the moderation of his adversary; and the retreat of the Gothic king was considered as the deliverance of Italy. Yet the people, and even the clergy, incapable of forming any rational judgment of the business of peace and war, presumed to arraign the policy of Stilicho, who so often vanquished, so often surrounded, and so often dismissed the implacable enemy of the republic. The first moment of the public safety is devoted to gratitude and joy; but the second is diligently occupied by envy and calumny.
The eloquence of Claudian has celebrated, with great praise, the victory of Pollentia, one of the most glorious days in the life of his patron; but his reluctant and biased muse gives more genuine praise to the character of the Gothic king. His name is indeed marked with the shameful titles of pirate and robber, which the conquerors of every age truly deserve; however, the poet of Stilicho must acknowledge that Alaric had the unyielding mindset that rises above every misfortune and finds new strength in adversity. After the complete defeat of his infantry, he escaped, or rather withdrew, from the battlefield with most of his cavalry intact and unbroken. Without wasting any time lamenting the irreplaceable loss of so many brave companions, he left his victorious enemy to chain the captive images of a Gothic king; and boldly decided to break through the unguarded passes of the Apennine to unleash destruction across the fertile land of Tuscany, and to conquer or die at the gates of Rome. The capital was saved by the active and constant effort of Stilicho; but he respected the despair of his enemy; and instead of leaving the fate of the republic to the risk of another battle, he suggested buying the Barbarians' absence. The spirit of Alaric would have rejected such terms, the permission to retreat, and the offer of a pension, with scorn and anger; but he exercised limited and fragile authority over the independent leaders who had elevated him, for their service, above the rank of his equals; they were even less likely to follow an unsuccessful general, and many of them were tempted to look out for their own interests through private negotiations with Honorius's minister. The king submitted to the will of his people, ratified the treaty with the Western Empire, and crossed back over the Po with the remnants of the strong army he had brought into Italy. A significant part of the Roman forces still followed his movements; and Stilicho, who kept up secret communication with some of the Barbarian chiefs, was kept well informed of the plans being formed in Alaric's camp and council. The king of the Goths, eager to mark his retreat with some grand achievement, had decided to take the important city of Verona, which controls the main route through the Rhætian Alps; and, directing his march through the lands of those German tribes, whose alliance would restore his depleted strength, to invade, from the side of the Rhine, the wealthy and unsuspecting provinces of Gaul. Unaware of the treason that had already undermined his bold and clever plan, he moved toward the mountain passes, already occupied by Imperial troops; where he was almost instantly faced with a general attack from the front, flanks, and rear. In this bloody battle, not far from the walls of Verona, the loss for the Goths was just as heavy as the one they suffered at Pollentia; and their valiant king, who escaped by the speed of his horse, would have been killed or captured if it weren't for the hasty recklessness of the Alani that disrupted the Roman general's plans. Alaric secured the remnants of his army on the nearby rocks; and prepared himself, with unwavering determination, to endure a siege against the larger numbers of the enemy surrounding him. But he couldn’t withstand the devastating advance of hunger and disease; nor could he halt the continuous desertion of his impatient and fickle Barbarians. In this dire situation, he still found strength in his own courage or in the restraint of his opponent; and the retreat of the Gothic king was seen as Italy’s salvation. Yet the people, and even the clergy, unable to form any reasonable judgment about the matters of peace and war, presumed to criticize the policies of Stilicho, who had so often defeated and dismissed the relentless enemy of the republic. The first moment of public safety is filled with gratitude and joy; but the second is quickly taken over by envy and slander.
The citizens of Rome had been astonished by the approach of Alaric; and the diligence with which they labored to restore the walls of the capital, confessed their own fears, and the decline of the empire. After the retreat of the Barbarians, Honorius was directed to accept the dutiful invitation of the senate, and to celebrate, in the Imperial city, the auspicious æra of the Gothic victory, and of his sixth consulship. The suburbs and the streets, from the Milvian bridge to the Palatine mount, were filled by the Roman people, who, in the space of a hundred years, had only thrice been honored with the presence of their sovereigns. While their eyes were fixed on the chariot where Stilicho was deservedly seated by the side of his royal pupil, they applauded the pomp of a triumph, which was not stained, like that of Constantine, or of Theodosius, with civil blood. The procession passed under a lofty arch, which had been purposely erected: but in less than seven years, the Gothic conquerors of Rome might read, if they were able to read, the superb inscription of that monument, which attested the total defeat and destruction of their nation. The emperor resided several months in the capital, and every part of his behavior was regulated with care to conciliate the affection of the clergy, the senate, and the people of Rome. The clergy was edified by his frequent visits and liberal gifts to the shrines of the apostles. The senate, who, in the triumphal procession, had been excused from the humiliating ceremony of preceding on foot the Imperial chariot, was treated with the decent reverence which Stilicho always affected for that assembly. The people was repeatedly gratified by the attention and courtesy of Honorius in the public games, which were celebrated on that occasion with a magnificence not unworthy of the spectator. As soon as the appointed number of chariot-races was concluded, the decoration of the Circus was suddenly changed; the hunting of wild beasts afforded a various and splendid entertainment; and the chase was succeeded by a military dance, which seems, in the lively description of Claudian, to present the image of a modern tournament.
The people of Rome were shocked by Alaric's arrival, and their efforts to rebuild the city walls revealed their fears and the empire's decline. After the Barbarians retreated, Honorius was urged to accept the respectful invitation from the senate and celebrate in the Imperial city the promising era of the Gothic victory and his sixth consulship. The suburbs and streets, from the Milvian Bridge to the Palatine Hill, were crowded with Romans who had only seen their emperors three times in a hundred years. As they focused on the chariot where Stilicho rightfully sat beside his royal student, they cheered for a triumph that, unlike Constantine's or Theodosius's, was free from civil bloodshed. The procession passed under a tall arch that had been built specifically for the occasion, but within seven years, the Gothic conquerors of Rome would see, if they could read, the grand inscription on that monument, which marked the complete defeat and destruction of their nation. The emperor stayed in the capital for several months, carefully managing his behavior to win the favor of the clergy, the senate, and the Roman people. The clergy was pleased by his frequent visits and generous donations to the apostles' shrines. The senate, which had been spared the humiliating task of walking in front of the Imperial chariot during the triumph, received the respectful treatment that Stilicho always showed toward them. The people were repeatedly pleased by Honorius's attentiveness and kindness during the public games celebrated for the occasion with impressive grandeur. Once the scheduled chariot races ended, the decorations of the Circus were suddenly changed; the wild beast hunts provided a diverse and spectacular entertainment, followed by a military dance that, in Claudian's lively description, resembled a modern tournament.
In these games of Honorius, the inhuman combats of gladiators polluted, for the last time, the amphitheater of Rome. The first Christian emperor may claim the honor of the first edict which condemned the art and amusement of shedding human blood; but this benevolent law expressed the wishes of the prince, without reforming an inveterate abuse, which degraded a civilized nation below the condition of savage cannibals. Several hundred, perhaps several thousand, victims were annually slaughtered in the great cities of the empire; and the month of December, more peculiarly devoted to the combats of gladiators, still exhibited to the eyes of the Roman people a grateful spectacle of blood and cruelty. Amidst the general joy of the victory of Pollentia, a Christian poet exhorted the emperor to extirpate, by his authority, the horrid custom which had so long resisted the voice of humanity and religion. The pathetic representations of Prudentius were less effectual than the generous boldness of Telemachus, an Asiatic monk, whose death was more useful to mankind than his life. The Romans were provoked by the interruption of their pleasures; and the rash monk, who had descended into the arena to separate the gladiators, was overwhelmed under a shower of stones. But the madness of the people soon subsided; they respected the memory of Telemachus, who had deserved the honors of martyrdom; and they submitted, without a murmur, to the laws of Honorius, which abolished forever the human sacrifices of the amphitheater. The citizens, who adhered to the manners of their ancestors, might perhaps insinuate that the last remains of a martial spirit were preserved in this school of fortitude, which accustomed the Romans to the sight of blood, and to the contempt of death; a vain and cruel prejudice, so nobly confuted by the valor of ancient Greece, and of modern Europe!
In these games of Honorius, the brutal fights of gladiators stained, for the last time, the amphitheater of Rome. The first Christian emperor may take credit for the first edict that condemned the practice and entertainment of spilling human blood; however, this kind law reflected the emperor's wishes without actually fixing a deep-rooted problem that lowered a civilized nation to the level of savage cannibals. Several hundred, maybe even several thousand, victims were killed every year in the major cities of the empire; and the month of December, particularly dedicated to the gladiator battles, continued to showcase to the Roman people a grim spectacle of blood and cruelty. Amid the general joy over the victory at Pollentia, a Christian poet urged the emperor to eliminate, through his authority, the horrific custom that had long ignored the calls for humanity and religion. The emotional pleas of Prudentius were less effective than the brave actions of Telemachus, an Asian monk, whose death proved more beneficial to humanity than his life. The Romans were angered by the disruption of their enjoyment; and the reckless monk, who stepped into the arena to separate the gladiators, was overwhelmed by a hail of stones. But the crowd's madness soon calmed; they honored the memory of Telemachus, who rightfully earned the title of martyr, and they complied, without complaint, with the laws of Honorius, which forever put an end to the human sacrifices of the amphitheater. The citizens, who held onto the customs of their ancestors, might suggest that the last remnants of a martial spirit were preserved in this arena of bravery, which accustomed the Romans to the sight of blood and the disdain for death; a futile and cruel belief, so nobly contradicted by the bravery of ancient Greece and modern Europe!
The recent danger, to which the person of the emperor had been exposed in the defenceless palace of Milan, urged him to seek a retreat in some inaccessible fortress of Italy, where he might securely remain, while the open country was covered by a deluge of Barbarians. On the coast of the Adriatic, about ten or twelve miles from the most southern of the seven mouths of the Po, the Thessalians had founded the ancient colony of Ravenna, which they afterwards resigned to the natives of Umbria. Augustus, who had observed the opportunity of the place, prepared, at the distance of three miles from the old town, a capacious harbor, for the reception of two hundred and fifty ships of war. This naval establishment, which included the arsenals and magazines, the barracks of the troops, and the houses of the artificers, derived its origin and name from the permanent station of the Roman fleet; the intermediate space was soon filled with buildings and inhabitants, and the three extensive and populous quarters of Ravenna gradually contributed to form one of the most important cities of Italy. The principal canal of Augustus poured a copious stream of the waters of the Po through the midst of the city, to the entrance of the harbor; the same waters were introduced into the profound ditches that encompassed the walls; they were distributed by a thousand subordinate canals, into every part of the city, which they divided into a variety of small islands; the communication was maintained only by the use of boats and bridges; and the houses of Ravenna, whose appearance may be compared to that of Venice, were raised on the foundation of wooden piles. The adjacent country, to the distance of many miles, was a deep and impassable morass; and the artificial causeway, which connected Ravenna with the continent, might be easily guarded or destroyed, on the approach of a hostile army. These morasses were interspersed, however, with vineyards: and though the soil was exhausted by four or five crops, the town enjoyed a more plentiful supply of wine than of fresh water. The air, instead of receiving the sickly, and almost pestilential, exhalations of low and marshy grounds, was distinguished, like the neighborhood of Alexandria, as uncommonly pure and salubrious; and this singular advantage was ascribed to the regular tides of the Adriatic, which swept the canals, interrupted the unwholesome stagnation of the waters, and floated, every day, the vessels of the adjacent country into the heart of Ravenna. The gradual retreat of the sea has left the modern city at the distance of four miles from the Adriatic; and as early as the fifth or sixth century of the Christian æra, the port of Augustus was converted into pleasant orchards; and a lonely grove of pines covered the ground where the Roman fleet once rode at anchor. Even this alteration contributed to increase the natural strength of the place, and the shallowness of the water was a sufficient barrier against the large ships of the enemy. This advantageous situation was fortified by art and labor; and in the twentieth year of his age, the emperor of the West, anxious only for his personal safety, retired to the perpetual confinement of the walls and morasses of Ravenna. The example of Honorius was imitated by his feeble successors, the Gothic kings, and afterwards the Exarchs, who occupied the throne and palace of the emperors; and till the middle of the eight century, Ravenna was considered as the seat of government, and the capital of Italy.
The recent threat to the emperor's safety in the vulnerable palace of Milan pushed him to find refuge in some remote fortress in Italy, where he could stay secure while the countryside was overwhelmed by a flood of Barbarians. Along the Adriatic coast, about ten or twelve miles from the southernmost of the seven mouths of the Po River, the Thessalians established the ancient settlement of Ravenna, which they later handed over to the local Umbria people. Augustus, noticing the strategic advantage of the location, built a large harbor three miles from the old town, capable of accommodating two hundred and fifty warships. This naval base, which included the arsenals and storage facilities, troop barracks, and workmen's homes, was named after the permanent station of the Roman fleet; the area quickly filled with buildings and residents, leading to Ravenna becoming one of the most significant cities in Italy. Augustus' main canal channeled a steady flow of Po River water through the city to the harbor entrance; this water was also directed into the deep ditches surrounding the walls and was distributed through numerous smaller canals, dividing the city into various small islands. Communication was maintained solely by boats and bridges, and the houses in Ravenna, resembling those of Venice, were built on wooden piles. The surrounding area for many miles was a dense and impassable swamp; the man-made causeway linking Ravenna to the mainland could be easily defended or destroyed in case of a hostile army's approach. However, these swamps were dotted with vineyards, and even though the soil had been depleted by several crops, the town had a more abundant supply of wine than fresh water. Instead of the unhealthy, almost pestilential emissions typical of low and marshy areas, the air was notably clean and healthy, much like the area around Alexandria; this unique benefit was attributed to the regular tides of the Adriatic, which cleaned the canals, interrupted the stagnant water, and daily brought vessels from the surrounding region into Ravenna's heart. Over time, the sea gradually receded, leaving the modern city four miles away from the Adriatic, and by the fifth or sixth century AD, Augustus' port had turned into pleasant orchards, and a solitary grove of pines covered the area where the Roman fleet once anchored. Even this change enhanced the site's natural defenses, and the shallow waters served as a barrier against large enemy ships. This advantageous location was strengthened through construction and effort; and at twenty years old, the emperor of the West, solely concerned for his safety, retreated to the enduring confinement of the walls and marshes of Ravenna. Honorius' example was followed by his weak successors, the Gothic kings, and later the Exarchs, who occupied the emperors' throne and palace; until the mid-eighth century, Ravenna was regarded as the government seat and capital of Italy.
The fears of Honorius were not without foundation, nor were his precautions without effect. While Italy rejoiced in her deliverance from the Goths, a furious tempest was excited among the nations of Germany, who yielded to the irresistible impulse that appears to have been gradually communicated from the eastern extremity of the continent of Asia. The Chinese annals, as they have been interpreted by the earned industry of the present age, may be usefully applied to reveal the secret and remote causes of the fall of the Roman empire. The extensive territory to the north of the great wall was possessed, after the flight of the Huns, by the victorious Sienpi, who were sometimes broken into independent tribes, and sometimes reunited under a supreme chief; till at length, styling themselves Topa, or masters of the earth, they acquired a more solid consistence, and a more formidable power. The Topa soon compelled the pastoral nations of the eastern desert to acknowledge the superiority of their arms; they invaded China in a period of weakness and intestine discord; and these fortunate Tartars, adopting the laws and manners of the vanquished people, founded an Imperial dynasty, which reigned near one hundred and sixty years over the northern provinces of the monarchy. Some generations before they ascended the throne of China, one of the Topa princes had enlisted in his cavalry a slave of the name of Moko, renowned for his valor, but who was tempted, by the fear of punishment, to desert his standard, and to range the desert at the head of a hundred followers. This gang of robbers and outlaws swelled into a camp, a tribe, a numerous people, distinguished by the appellation of Geougen; and their hereditary chieftains, the posterity of Moko the slave, assumed their rank among the Scythian monarchs. The youth of Toulun, the greatest of his descendants, was exercised by those misfortunes which are the school of heroes. He bravely struggled with adversity, broke the imperious yoke of the Topa, and became the legislator of his nation, and the conqueror of Tartary. His troops were distributed into regular bands of a hundred and of a thousand men; cowards were stoned to death; the most splendid honors were proposed as the reward of valor; and Toulun, who had knowledge enough to despise the learning of China, adopted only such arts and institutions as were favorable to the military spirit of his government. His tents, which he removed in the winter season to a more southern latitude, were pitched, during the summer, on the fruitful banks of the Selinga. His conquests stretched from Corea far beyond the River Irtish. He vanquished, in the country to the north of the Caspian Sea, the nation of the Huns; and the new title of Khan, or Cagan, expressed the fame and power which he derived from this memorable victory.
The fears of Honorius were justified, and his precautions made a difference. While Italy celebrated its escape from the Goths, a fierce storm was brewing among the nations of Germany, responding to an unstoppable force that seemed to have slowly spread from the eastern edge of Asia. The Chinese records, as interpreted by today’s scholars, can help us understand the hidden and distant causes of the fall of the Roman Empire. The vast land north of the Great Wall was inhabited, after the Huns’ retreat, by the conquering Sienpi, who sometimes split into independent tribes and sometimes united under one leader. Eventually, they called themselves Topa, or masters of the earth, gaining a more stable organization and greater strength. The Topa quickly forced the nomadic tribes of the eastern desert to recognize their military superiority; they invaded China during a time of weakness and internal conflict; these fortunate Tartars, adopting the customs and laws of the defeated people, established an imperial dynasty that ruled for nearly one hundred sixty years over the northern parts of the empire. Several generations before they took control in China, one of the Topa princes had recruited a slave named Moko into his cavalry, known for his bravery, who, fearing punishment, deserted and gathered a hundred followers to roam the desert. This group of outlaws turned into a camp, a tribe, a large community known as Geougen; and their hereditary leaders, descendants of Moko the slave, earned their place among the Scythian rulers. Toulun, the greatest of his descendants, faced hardships that served as the training ground for heroes. He fought valiantly against adversity, broke the dominating rule of the Topa, and became the lawmaker for his people and the conqueror of Tartary. His troops were organized into regular bands of one hundred and one thousand men; cowards faced stoning; the highest honors were offered as rewards for bravery; and Toulun, who had enough wisdom to ignore the education of China, only adopted practices and institutions that bolstered the military spirit of his rule. In the winter, he moved his tents to a warmer southern region, and during the summer, they were set up along the fertile banks of the Selinga. His conquests reached from Korea far beyond the River Irtish. He defeated the Huns in the lands north of the Caspian Sea; his new title of Khan, or Cagan, reflected the fame and power he gained from this significant victory.
The chain of events is interrupted, or rather is concealed, as it passes from the Volga to the Vistula, through the dark interval which separates the extreme limits of the Chinese, and of the Roman, geography. Yet the temper of the Barbarians, and the experience of successive emigrations, sufficiently declare, that the Huns, who were oppressed by the arms of the Geougen, soon withdrew from the presence of an insulting victor. The countries towards the Euxine were already occupied by their kindred tribes; and their hasty flight, which they soon converted into a bold attack, would more naturally be directed towards the rich and level plains, through which the Vistula gently flows into the Baltic Sea. The North must again have been alarmed, and agitated, by the invasion of the Huns; and the nations who retreated before them must have pressed with incumbent weight on the confines of Germany. The inhabitants of those regions, which the ancients have assigned to the Suevi, the Vandals, and the Burgundians, might embrace the resolution of abandoning to the fugitives of Sarmatia their woods and morasses; or at least of discharging their superfluous numbers on the provinces of the Roman empire. About four years after the victorious Toulun had assumed the title of Khan of the Geougen, another Barbarian, the haughty Rhodogast, or Radagaisus, marched from the northern extremities of Germany almost to the gates of Rome, and left the remains of his army to achieve the destruction of the West. The Vandals, the Suevi, and the Burgundians, formed the strength of this mighty host; but the Alani, who had found a hospitable reception in their new seats, added their active cavalry to the heavy infantry of the Germans; and the Gothic adventurers crowded so eagerly to the standard of Radagaisus, that by some historians, he has been styled the King of the Goths. Twelve thousand warriors, distinguished above the vulgar by their noble birth, or their valiant deeds, glittered in the van; and the whole multitude, which was not less than two hundred thousand fighting men, might be increased, by the accession of women, of children, and of slaves, to the amount of four hundred thousand persons. This formidable emigration issued from the same coast of the Baltic, which had poured forth the myriads of the Cimbri and Teutones, to assault Rome and Italy in the vigor of the republic. After the departure of those Barbarians, their native country, which was marked by the vestiges of their greatness, long ramparts, and gigantic moles, remained, during some ages, a vast and dreary solitude; till the human species was renewed by the powers of generation, and the vacancy was filled by the influx of new inhabitants. The nations who now usurp an extent of land which they are unable to cultivate, would soon be assisted by the industrious poverty of their neighbors, if the government of Europe did not protect the claims of dominion and property.
The chain of events is disrupted, or rather hidden, as it moves from the Volga to the Vistula, crossing the dark gap that separates the far reaches of Chinese and Roman geography. Still, the nature of the Barbarians and the experience of numerous migrations clearly show that the Huns, who were oppressed by the forces of the Geougen, quickly fled from the face of an arrogant victor. The regions near the Black Sea were already occupied by their related tribes; their swift retreat quickly turned into a bold offensive, which was more naturally aimed at the rich, flat plains where the Vistula flows gently into the Baltic Sea. The North must have been once again disturbed and unsettled by the Huns' invasion; the nations that retreated before them must have pressed heavily against the borders of Germany. The people in those areas, once associated with the Suevi, the Vandals, and the Burgundians, might have decided to abandon their woods and marshes to the Sarmatian fugitives or at least to send their surplus population into the provinces of the Roman Empire. About four years after the victorious Toulun took the title of Khan of the Geougen, another Barbarian, the proud Rhodogast, or Radagaisus, marched from the northern edges of Germany almost to the gates of Rome, leaving behind the remnants of his army to bring ruin to the West. The Vandals, the Suevi, and the Burgundians made up the bulk of this powerful force; but the Alani, who had found a warm welcome in their new homes, added their swift cavalry to the heavier infantry of the Germans. The Gothic adventurers flocked eagerly to Radagaisus' banner, so much so that some historians called him the King of the Goths. Twelve thousand warriors, notable for either their noble birth or their brave actions, led the charge, and the entire multitude, numbering at least two hundred thousand fighters, could swell to four hundred thousand people with the inclusion of women, children, and slaves. This fearsome migration came from the same Baltic coast that had sent forth the countless Cimbri and Teutones to attack Rome and Italy during the height of the Republic. After these Barbarians left, their homeland, marked by remnants of their greatness, expansive ramparts, and massive structures, remained a vast, desolate area for many ages until humanity was revitalized through reproduction, and the emptiness was filled by new settlers. The nations currently occupying land they cannot farm would soon benefit from the industrious poverty of their neighbors if European governance did not uphold claims of ownership and property.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part IV.
The correspondence of nations was, in that age, so imperfect and precarious, that the revolutions of the North might escape the knowledge of the court of Ravenna; till the dark cloud, which was collected along the coast of the Baltic, burst in thunder upon the banks of the Upper Danube. The emperor of the West, if his ministers disturbed his amusements by the news of the impending danger, was satisfied with being the occasion, and the spectator, of the war. The safety of Rome was intrusted to the counsels, and the sword, of Stilicho; but such was the feeble and exhausted state of the empire, that it was impossible to restore the fortifications of the Danube, or to prevent, by a vigorous effort, the invasion of the Germans. The hopes of the vigilant minister of Honorius were confined to the defence of Italy. He once more abandoned the provinces, recalled the troops, pressed the new levies, which were rigorously exacted, and pusillanimously eluded; employed the most efficacious means to arrest, or allure, the deserters; and offered the gift of freedom, and of two pieces of gold, to all the slaves who would enlist. By these efforts he painfully collected, from the subjects of a great empire, an army of thirty or forty thousand men, which, in the days of Scipio or Camillus, would have been instantly furnished by the free citizens of the territory of Rome. The thirty legions of Stilicho were reënforced by a large body of Barbarian auxiliaries; the faithful Alani were personally attached to his service; and the troops of Huns and of Goths, who marched under the banners of their native princes, Huldin and Sarus, were animated by interest and resentment to oppose the ambition of Radagaisus. The king of the confederate Germans passed, without resistance, the Alps, the Po, and the Apennine; leaving on one hand the inaccessible palace of Honorius, securely buried among the marshes of Ravenna; and, on the other, the camp of Stilicho, who had fixed his head-quarters at Ticinum, or Pavia, but who seems to have avoided a decisive battle, till he had assembled his distant forces. Many cities of Italy were pillaged, or destroyed; and the siege of Florence, by Radagaisus, is one of the earliest events in the history of that celebrated republic; whose firmness checked and delayed the unskillful fury of the Barbarians. The senate and people trembled at their approach within a hundred and eighty miles of Rome; and anxiously compared the danger which they had escaped, with the new perils to which they were exposed. Alaric was a Christian and a soldier, the leader of a disciplined army; who understood the laws of war, who respected the sanctity of treaties, and who had familiarly conversed with the subjects of the empire in the same camps, and the same churches. The savage Radagaisus was a stranger to the manners, the religion, and even the language, of the civilized nations of the South. The fierceness of his temper was exasperated by cruel superstition; and it was universally believed, that he had bound himself, by a solemn vow, to reduce the city into a heap of stones and ashes, and to sacrifice the most illustrious of the Roman senators on the altars of those gods who were appeased by human blood. The public danger, which should have reconciled all domestic animosities, displayed the incurable madness of religious faction. The oppressed votaries of Jupiter and Mercury respected, in the implacable enemy of Rome, the character of a devout Pagan; loudly declared, that they were more apprehensive of the sacrifices, than of the arms, of Radagaisus; and secretly rejoiced in the calamities of their country, which condemned the faith of their Christian adversaries.
The communication between nations back then was so limited and unreliable that the upheavals in the North might go unnoticed by the court of Ravenna until the dark storm forming along the Baltic coast erupted in chaos on the banks of the Upper Danube. The Western emperor, when his ministers interrupted his leisure with news of the looming threat, was content to be just a participant and spectator in the war. The safety of Rome relied upon the advice and military leadership of Stilicho; however, the weakened and drained state of the empire made it impossible to restore the fortifications along the Danube or to vigorously stop the German invasion. Stilicho's hopes were focused solely on defending Italy. He once again abandoned the provinces, recalled the troops, pushed for new recruits, which were harshly demanded and reluctantly evaded; used effective methods to capture or entice deserters; and offered freedom and two gold coins to any slaves willing to join the fight. Through these efforts, he painfully assembled an army of thirty to forty thousand men from the subjects of a vast empire, a force that would have been swiftly provided by the free citizens of Rome in the days of Scipio or Camillus. Stilicho's thirty legions were bolstered by a large number of Barbarian allies; the loyal Alani were personally devoted to him; and the troops of Huns and Goths, who marched under their leaders Huldin and Sarus, were driven by self-interest and grudges to oppose Radagaisus's ambitions. The king of the allied Germans crossed the Alps, the Po, and the Apennines without facing resistance, leaving the unreachable palace of Honorius safely hidden in the marshes of Ravenna on one side, and Stilicho's camp, headquartered at Ticinum, or Pavia, on the other. However, he seemed to delay a decisive battle until he had gathered his distant forces. Many cities in Italy were looted or destroyed, and Radagaisus’s siege of Florence marks one of the early events in the history of that famous republic, whose resilience held off and postponed the clumsy fury of the Barbarians. The senate and the people trembled at the sight of the enemy just a hundred and eighty miles from Rome, anxiously comparing the danger they had narrowly escaped with the new threats looming over them. Alaric was a Christian soldier, a leader of a well-disciplined army; he understood the laws of warfare, respected the sanctity of treaties, and had interacted closely with the empire's subjects in the same camps and churches. In contrast, the savage Radagaisus knew nothing of the customs, religion, or even the language of the civilized Southern nations. His fierce temperament was worsened by brutal superstition, and there was a widespread belief that he had vowed to reduce the city to rubble and ashes, sacrificing the most notable of the Roman senators to the gods whose wrath demanded human blood. The public threat that should have united all internal conflicts instead revealed the unhealed insanity of religious division. The oppressed followers of Jupiter and Mercury recognized in Rome's relentless enemy the traits of a devoted Pagan; they openly stated that they feared his sacrifices more than his weapons, and secretly took pleasure in their country’s misfortunes, which seemed to invalidate the faith of their Christian opponents.
Florence was reduced to the last extremity; and the fainting courage of the citizens was supported only by the authority of St. Ambrose; who had communicated, in a dream, the promise of a speedy deliverance. On a sudden, they beheld, from their walls, the banners of Stilicho, who advanced, with his united force, to the relief of the faithful city; and who soon marked that fatal spot for the grave of the Barbarian host. The apparent contradictions of those writers who variously relate the defeat of Radagaisus, may be reconciled without offering much violence to their respective testimonies. Orosius and Augustin, who were intimately connected by friendship and religion, ascribed this miraculous victory to the providence of God, rather than to the valor of man. They strictly exclude every idea of chance, or even of bloodshed; and positively affirm, that the Romans, whose camp was the scene of plenty and idleness, enjoyed the distress of the Barbarians, slowly expiring on the sharp and barren ridge of the hills of Fæsulæ, which rise above the city of Florence. Their extravagant assertion that not a single soldier of the Christian army was killed, or even wounded, may be dismissed with silent contempt; but the rest of the narrative of Augustin and Orosius is consistent with the state of the war, and the character of Stilicho. Conscious that he commanded the last army of the republic, his prudence would not expose it, in the open field, to the headstrong fury of the Germans. The method of surrounding the enemy with strong lines of circumvallation, which he had twice employed against the Gothic king, was repeated on a larger scale, and with more considerable effect. The examples of Cæsar must have been familiar to the most illiterate of the Roman warriors; and the fortifications of Dyrrachium, which connected twenty-four castles, by a perpetual ditch and rampart of fifteen miles, afforded the model of an intrenchment which might confine, and starve, the most numerous host of Barbarians. The Roman troops had less degenerated from the industry, than from the valor, of their ancestors; and if their servile and laborious work offended the pride of the soldiers, Tuscany could supply many thousand peasants, who would labor, though, perhaps, they would not fight, for the salvation of their native country. The imprisoned multitude of horses and men was gradually destroyed, by famine rather than by the sword; but the Romans were exposed, during the progress of such an extensive work, to the frequent attacks of an impatient enemy. The despair of the hungry Barbarians would precipitate them against the fortifications of Stilicho; the general might sometimes indulge the ardor of his brave auxiliaries, who eagerly pressed to assault the camp of the Germans; and these various incidents might produce the sharp and bloody conflicts which dignify the narrative of Zosimus, and the Chronicles of Prosper and Marcellinus. A seasonable supply of men and provisions had been introduced into the walls of Florence, and the famished host of Radagaisus was in its turn besieged. The proud monarch of so many warlike nations, after the loss of his bravest warriors, was reduced to confide either in the faith of a capitulation, or in the clemency of Stilicho. But the death of the royal captive, who was ignominiously beheaded, disgraced the triumph of Rome and of Christianity; and the short delay of his execution was sufficient to brand the conqueror with the guilt of cool and deliberate cruelty. The famished Germans, who escaped the fury of the auxiliaries, were sold as slaves, at the contemptible price of as many single pieces of gold; but the difference of food and climate swept away great numbers of those unhappy strangers; and it was observed, that the inhuman purchasers, instead of reaping the fruits of their labor were soon obliged to provide the expense of their interment. Stilicho informed the emperor and the senate of his success; and deserved, a second time, the glorious title of Deliverer of Italy.
Florence was brought to its last desperate point; the fading courage of the citizens was only upheld by the authority of St. Ambrose, who had shared, in a dream, the promise of quick deliverance. Suddenly, they saw from their walls the banners of Stilicho, who came with his united forces to save the faithful city, and soon marked that deadly place as the burial ground for the Barbarian army. The conflicting accounts from various writers about the defeat of Radagaisus can be reconciled without too much strain on their respective testimonies. Orosius and Augustine, who were closely connected through friendship and faith, credited this miraculous victory to God’s providence rather than to human bravery. They completely dismissed any notion of chance or even bloodshed, asserting that the Romans, whose camp was filled with abundance and inactivity, thrived while the Barbarians slowly perished on the harsh, barren hills of Fæsulæ, which rise above Florence. Their outrageous claim that not a single soldier in the Christian army was killed or even injured can be dismissed with silent disdain; however, the rest of Augustine and Orosius's accounts align with the state of the war and the character of Stilicho. Aware that he commanded the last army of the republic, Stilicho’s wisdom kept him from exposing it to the reckless fury of the Germans in open battle. The tactic of surrounding the enemy with strong defensive lines, which he had employed twice against the Gothic king, was carried out on a larger scale and with more significant effect. The examples set by Caesar must have been known even to the least educated Roman warriors, and the fortifications at Dyrrachium, which connected twenty-four castles with a continuous ditch and rampart stretching fifteen miles, provided a model for a fortification that could confine and starve the largest Barbarian forces. The Roman troops had deteriorated less in terms of work ethic than in valor from their ancestors; and while their menial labor might offend the pride of the soldiers, Tuscany could provide many thousands of peasants willing to work—though perhaps not fight—for the safety of their homeland. The trapped masses of horses and men were gradually perishing more from starvation than from the sword; however, the Romans faced frequent attacks from an impatient enemy during the course of such a large operation. The desperation of the starving Barbarians would lead them to assault Stilicho’s fortifications; the general might sometimes allow the eagerness of his brave auxiliaries, who were keen to attack the German camp, to come into play; and these various incidents may have led to the intense and bloody battles that embellish the narratives of Zosimus and the Chronicles of Prosper and Marcellinus. A timely supply of men and provisions had been brought into the walls of Florence, and Radagaisus’s famished army found itself besieged in turn. The proud ruler of so many warlike nations, after losing his bravest warriors, was left to rely on either the hope of surrender or the mercy of Stilicho. But the execution of the royal captive, who was executed dishonorably, marred the triumph of Rome and Christianity; and the brief delay before his execution was enough to stain the conqueror with the mark of cold and deliberate cruelty. The starving Germans who survived the wrath of the auxiliaries were sold into slavery for the meager price of a few pieces of gold; however, the differences in food and climate wiped out many of those unfortunate foreigners, and it was noted that the cruel buyers, instead of enjoying the benefits of their labor, soon found themselves needing to cover the costs of their burials. Stilicho informed the emperor and the senate of his success and rightfully earned the glorious title of Deliverer of Italy for the second time.
The fame of the victory, and more especially of the miracle, has encouraged a vain persuasion, that the whole army, or rather nation, of Germans, who migrated from the shores of the Baltic, miserably perished under the walls of Florence. Such indeed was the fate of Radagaisus himself, of his brave and faithful companions, and of more than one third of the various multitude of Sueves and Vandals, of Alani and Burgundians, who adhered to the standard of their general. The union of such an army might excite our surprise, but the causes of separation are obvious and forcible; the pride of birth, the insolence of valor, the jealousy of command, the impatience of subordination, and the obstinate conflict of opinions, of interests, and of passions, among so many kings and warriors, who were untaught to yield, or to obey. After the defeat of Radagaisus, two parts of the German host, which must have exceeded the number of one hundred thousand men, still remained in arms, between the Apennine and the Alps, or between the Alps and the Danube. It is uncertain whether they attempted to revenge the death of their general; but their irregular fury was soon diverted by the prudence and firmness of Stilicho, who opposed their march, and facilitated their retreat; who considered the safety of Rome and Italy as the great object of his care, and who sacrificed, with too much indifference, the wealth and tranquillity of the distant provinces. The Barbarians acquired, from the junction of some Pannonian deserters, the knowledge of the country, and of the roads; and the invasion of Gaul, which Alaric had designed, was executed by the remains of the great army of Radagaisus.
The fame of the victory, especially the miracle, has fueled a misguided belief that the entire German army, or rather the nation of Germans, who came from the Baltic shores, tragically perished outside Florence. Indeed, that was the fate of Radagaisus himself, along with his brave and loyal companions, and more than a third of the diverse crowd of Sueves, Vandals, Alani, and Burgundians who rallied around their leader. The unity of such a force might surprise us, but the reasons for their division are clear and compelling: pride of birth, arrogance in battle, jealousy over leadership, impatience with being subordinate, and the stubborn clash of beliefs, interests, and passions among so many kings and warriors who were untrained to yield or obey. After Radagaisus was defeated, two-thirds of the German forces, likely numbering over one hundred thousand men, remained armed between the Apennines and the Alps, or between the Alps and the Danube. It's unclear if they sought revenge for their leader's death, but their chaotic anger was soon redirected by the wisdom and determination of Stilicho, who blocked their advance and helped facilitate their retreat. He viewed the safety of Rome and Italy as his main concern, sacrificing the wealth and peace of distant provinces with too little regard. The Barbarians gained insight into the area and the routes due to the joining of some Pannonian deserters, and Alaric's planned invasion of Gaul was carried out by the remnants of Radagaisus’s large army.
Yet if they expected to derive any assistance from the tribes of Germany, who inhabited the banks of the Rhine, their hopes were disappointed. The Alemanni preserved a state of inactive neutrality; and the Franks distinguished their zeal and courage in the defence of the of the empire. In the rapid progress down the Rhine, which was the first act of the administration of Stilicho, he had applied himself, with peculiar attention, to secure the alliance of the warlike Franks, and to remove the irreconcilable enemies of peace and of the republic. Marcomir, one of their kings, was publicly convicted, before the tribunal of the Roman magistrate, of violating the faith of treaties. He was sentenced to a mild, but distant exile, in the province of Tuscany; and this degradation of the regal dignity was so far from exciting the resentment of his subjects, that they punished with death the turbulent Sunno, who attempted to revenge his brother; and maintained a dutiful allegiance to the princes, who were established on the throne by the choice of Stilicho. When the limits of Gaul and Germany were shaken by the northern emigration, the Franks bravely encountered the single force of the Vandals; who, regardless of the lessons of adversity, had again separated their troops from the standard of their Barbarian allies. They paid the penalty of their rashness; and twenty thousand Vandals, with their king Godigisclus, were slain in the field of battle. The whole people must have been extirpated, if the squadrons of the Alani, advancing to their relief, had not trampled down the infantry of the Franks; who, after an honorable resistance, were compelled to relinquish the unequal contest. The victorious confederates pursued their march, and on the last day of the year, in a season when the waters of the Rhine were most probably frozen, they entered, without opposition, the defenceless provinces of Gaul. This memorable passage of the Suevi, the Vandals, the Alani, and the Burgundians, who never afterwards retreated, may be considered as the fall of the Roman empire in the countries beyond the Alps; and the barriers, which had so long separated the savage and the civilized nations of the earth, were from that fatal moment levelled with the ground.
Yet if they expected to get any help from the tribes of Germany living along the Rhine, they were disappointed. The Alemanni maintained a stance of inactive neutrality, while the Franks showed their commitment and bravery in defending the empire. In the swift campaign down the Rhine, the first action of Stilicho's administration, he focused on securing the alliance of the militaristic Franks and getting rid of those who were irreconcilable threats to peace and the republic. Marcomir, one of their kings, was publicly found guilty by a Roman magistrate of breaking treaty agreements. He was sentenced to a mild but distant exile in Tuscany; and this demotion of royal status did not anger his subjects; instead, they executed the rebellious Sunno, who tried to avenge his brother, and remained loyally aligned with the princes chosen by Stilicho. As the boundaries of Gaul and Germany were shaken by northern migrations, the Franks bravely faced the Vandals alone, who, ignoring the lessons learned from defeat, had once again separated from their Barbarian allies. They paid for their recklessness, with twenty thousand Vandals and their king Godigisclus killed in battle. The entire group might have been wiped out if the Alani, coming to their aid, hadn’t trampled the Frankish infantry; who, after a valiant fight, were forced to concede the uneven battle. The victorious allies continued their advance, and on the last day of the year, during the cold season when the Rhine was likely frozen, they entered the defenseless lands of Gaul without opposition. This significant march of the Suevi, Vandals, Alani, and Burgundians, who would never retreat again, can be seen as the fall of the Roman Empire in the regions beyond the Alps; and the barriers that had long kept savage and civilized nations apart were from that fateful moment destroyed.
While the peace of Germany was secured by the attachment of the Franks, and the neutrality of the Alemanni, the subjects of Rome, unconscious of their approaching calamities, enjoyed the state of quiet and prosperity, which had seldom blessed the frontiers of Gaul. Their flocks and herds were permitted to graze in the pastures of the Barbarians; their huntsmen penetrated, without fear or danger, into the darkest recesses of the Hercynian wood. The banks of the Rhine were crowned, like those of the Tyber, with elegant houses, and well-cultivated farms; and if a poet descended the river, he might express his doubt, on which side was situated the territory of the Romans. This scene of peace and plenty was suddenly changed into a desert; and the prospect of the smoking ruins could alone distinguish the solitude of nature from the desolation of man. The flourishing city of Mentz was surprised and destroyed; and many thousand Christians were inhumanly massacred in the church. Worms perished after a long and obstinate siege; Strasburgh, Spires, Rheims, Tournay, Arras, Amiens, experienced the cruel oppression of the German yoke; and the consuming flames of war spread from the banks of the Rhine over the greatest part of the seventeen provinces of Gaul. That rich and extensive country, as far as the ocean, the Alps, and the Pyrenees, was delivered to the Barbarians, who drove before them, in a promiscuous crowd, the bishop, the senator, and the virgin, laden with the spoils of their houses and altars. The ecclesiastics, to whom we are indebted for this vague description of the public calamities, embraced the opportunity of exhorting the Christians to repent of the sins which had provoked the Divine Justice, and to renounce the perishable goods of a wretched and deceitful world. But as the Pelagian controversy, which attempts to sound the abyss of grace and predestination, soon became the serious employment of the Latin clergy, the Providence which had decreed, or foreseen, or permitted, such a train of moral and natural evils, was rashly weighed in the imperfect and fallacious balance of reason. The crimes, and the misfortunes, of the suffering people, were presumptuously compared with those of their ancestors; and they arraigned the Divine Justice, which did not exempt from the common destruction the feeble, the guiltless, the infant portion of the human species. These idle disputants overlooked the invariable laws of nature, which have connected peace with innocence, plenty with industry, and safety with valor. The timid and selfish policy of the court of Ravenna might recall the Palatine legions for the protection of Italy; the remains of the stationary troops might be unequal to the arduous task; and the Barbarian auxiliaries might prefer the unbounded license of spoil to the benefits of a moderate and regular stipend. But the provinces of Gaul were filled with a numerous race of hardy and robust youth, who, in the defence of their houses, their families, and their altars, if they had dared to die, would have deserved to vanquish. The knowledge of their native country would have enabled them to oppose continual and insuperable obstacles to the progress of an invader; and the deficiency of the Barbarians, in arms, as well as in discipline, removed the only pretence which excuses the submission of a populous country to the inferior numbers of a veteran army. When France was invaded by Charles V., he inquired of a prisoner, how many days Paris might be distant from the frontier; "Perhaps twelve, but they will be days of battle:" such was the gallant answer which checked the arrogance of that ambitious prince. The subjects of Honorius, and those of Francis I., were animated by a very different spirit; and in less than two years, the divided troops of the savages of the Baltic, whose numbers, were they fairly stated, would appear contemptible, advanced, without a combat, to the foot of the Pyrenean Mountains.
While the peace of Germany was secured by the alliance with the Franks and the neutrality of the Alemanni, the subjects of Rome, unaware of their impending disasters, enjoyed a rare period of peace and prosperity on the borders of Gaul. Their flocks and herds grazed freely in the pastures of the Barbarians; their hunters ventured into the depths of the Hercynian forest without fear. The banks of the Rhine were lined with elegant homes and well-tended farms, and a poet traveling down the river might wonder which side belonged to Roman territory. This scene of peace and abundance was suddenly transformed into a wasteland; only the sight of smoking ruins differentiated the solitude of nature from the devastation wrought by humanity. The thriving city of Mentz was caught off guard and destroyed, with thousands of Christians brutally slaughtered in the church. Worms fell after a lengthy and fierce siege; Strasburgh, Spires, Rheims, Tournay, Arras, and Amiens suffered the harsh oppression of German rule; and the flames of war spread from the Rhine to most of the seventeen provinces of Gaul. That rich and vast region, stretching to the ocean, the Alps, and the Pyrenees, was handed over to the Barbarians, who forced the bishop, the senator, and the virgin into a chaotic crowd, weighed down by the plunder of their homes and altars. The clergy, who provided this vague account of the public disasters, seized the chance to urge Christians to repent for the sins that had triggered Divine Justice and to reject the fleeting goods of a miserable and misleading world. However, as the Pelagian controversy—debating the depths of grace and predestination—soon became the main concern of the Latin clergy, the Providence that had decided, foreseen, or allowed such a chain of moral and natural disasters was hastily examined through the flawed lens of reason. The crimes and misfortunes of the suffering people were carelessly compared with those of their ancestors, leading them to challenge Divine Justice, which did not spare the weak, the innocent, or the children from widespread destruction. These idle debaters ignored the unchanging laws of nature, which link peace with innocence, abundance with effort, and safety with courage. The timid and selfish policies of the court of Ravenna might have recalled the Palatine legions for Italy's protection; the remaining stationary troops might have been insufficient for the difficult task; and the Barbarian allies might have preferred the unrestricted plunder over the benefits of a steady and moderate payment. But the provinces of Gaul were home to a large population of strong and hardy youth who, if they had dared to fight, would have deserved victory in defending their homes, families, and altars. Their knowledge of the land would have allowed them to create constant and insurmountable obstacles for any invader; and the Barbarians' lack of weapons and training eliminated any excuse for a populous country to submit to a smaller, experienced army. When France was invaded by Charles V, he asked a prisoner how many days Paris might be from the border: "Perhaps twelve, but they will be days of battle," was the brave response that quelled the pride of that ambitious prince. The subjects of Honorius and those of Francis I were driven by a very different spirit; and within two years, the divided forces of the Baltic savages, whose numbers, if properly counted, would seem trivial, advanced without a fight to the foot of the Pyrenean Mountains.
In the early part of the reign of Honorius, the vigilance of Stilicho had successfully guarded the remote island of Britain from her incessant enemies of the ocean, the mountains, and the Irish coast. But those restless Barbarians could not neglect the fair opportunity of the Gothic war, when the walls and stations of the province were stripped of the Roman troops. If any of the legionaries were permitted to return from the Italian expedition, their faithful report of the court and character of Honorius must have tended to dissolve the bonds of allegiance, and to exasperate the seditious temper of the British army. The spirit of revolt, which had formerly disturbed the age of Gallienus, was revived by the capricious violence of the soldiers; and the unfortunate, perhaps the ambitious, candidates, who were the objects of their choice, were the instruments, and at length the victims, of their passion. Marcus was the first whom they placed on the throne, as the lawful emperor of Britain and of the West. They violated, by the hasty murder of Marcus, the oath of fidelity which they had imposed on themselves; and their disapprobation of his manners may seem to inscribe an honorable epitaph on his tomb. Gratian was the next whom they adorned with the diadem and the purple; and, at the end of four months, Gratian experienced the fate of his predecessor. The memory of the great Constantine, whom the British legions had given to the church and to the empire, suggested the singular motive of their third choice. They discovered in the ranks a private soldier of the name of Constantine, and their impetuous levity had already seated him on the throne, before they perceived his incapacity to sustain the weight of that glorious appellation. Yet the authority of Constantine was less precarious, and his government was more successful, than the transient reigns of Marcus and of Gratian. The danger of leaving his inactive troops in those camps, which had been twice polluted with blood and sedition, urged him to attempt the reduction of the Western provinces. He landed at Boulogne with an inconsiderable force; and after he had reposed himself some days, he summoned the cities of Gaul, which had escaped the yoke of the Barbarians, to acknowledge their lawful sovereign. They obeyed the summons without reluctance. The neglect of the court of Ravenna had absolved a deserted people from the duty of allegiance; their actual distress encouraged them to accept any circumstances of change, without apprehension, and, perhaps, with some degree of hope; and they might flatter themselves, that the troops, the authority, and even the name of a Roman emperor, who fixed his residence in Gaul, would protect the unhappy country from the rage of the Barbarians. The first successes of Constantine against the detached parties of the Germans, were magnified by the voice of adulation into splendid and decisive victories; which the reunion and insolence of the enemy soon reduced to their just value. His negotiations procured a short and precarious truce; and if some tribes of the Barbarians were engaged, by the liberality of his gifts and promises, to undertake the defence of the Rhine, these expensive and uncertain treaties, instead of restoring the pristine vigor of the Gallic frontier, served only to disgrace the majesty of the prince, and to exhaust what yet remained of the treasures of the republic. Elated, however, with this imaginary triumph, the vain deliverer of Gaul advanced into the provinces of the South, to encounter a more pressing and personal danger. Sarus the Goth was ordered to lay the head of the rebel at the feet of the emperor Honorius; and the forces of Britain and Italy were unworthily consumed in this domestic quarrel. After the loss of his two bravest generals, Justinian and Nevigastes, the former of whom was slain in the field of battle, the latter in a peaceful but treacherous interview, Constantine fortified himself within the walls of Vienna. The place was ineffectually attacked seven days; and the Imperial army supported, in a precipitate retreat, the ignominy of purchasing a secure passage from the freebooters and outlaws of the Alps. Those mountains now separated the dominions of two rival monarchs; and the fortifications of the double frontier were guarded by the troops of the empire, whose arms would have been more usefully employed to maintain the Roman limits against the Barbarians of Germany and Scythia.
In the early part of Honorius's reign, Stilicho's vigilance had effectively protected the remote island of Britain from the constant threats posed by the ocean, the mountains, and the Irish coast. But those restless Barbarians couldn't pass up the opportunity presented by the Gothic war when the province's walls and posts were stripped of Roman troops. If any legionaries were allowed to return from the Italian campaign, their honest report about the court and character of Honorius would likely weaken their loyalty and fuel the rebellious attitude of the British army. The spirit of revolt, previously seen during Gallienus's time, was reignited by the unpredictable violence of the soldiers; the unfortunate, and perhaps ambitious, candidates they chose became both the tools and ultimately the victims of their passion. Marcus was the first to be declared as the rightful emperor of Britain and the West. They broke the oath of loyalty they had sworn by hastily murdering Marcus, and their disapproval of his character might seem to inscribe an honorable epitaph on his tomb. Gratian was next, adorned with the crown and purple; however, after just four months, Gratian met the same fate as his predecessor. The memory of the great Constantine, whom the British legions had bestowed upon the church and the empire, inspired their third choice. They found a private soldier named Constantine among their ranks, and in their impulsiveness, had already placed him on the throne before realizing he wasn't capable of handling such a grand title. Yet, Constantine's authority was more stable, and his rule was more effective than the short reigns of Marcus and Gratian. The risk of leaving his inactive troops in camps tainted with blood and rebellion pushed him to take action in the Western provinces. He landed at Boulogne with a small force; after resting for several days, he called on the cities of Gaul, which had escaped Barbarian control, to recognize their rightful ruler. They complied without hesitation. The neglect from the court in Ravenna had freed a neglected people from their allegiance, their current struggles encouraged them to welcome any change, possibly with some hope; and they might have convinced themselves that the presence and authority of a Roman emperor, who resided in Gaul, would shield the unfortunate region from Barbarian wrath. Constantine's early successes against scattered German forces were exaggerated by flattery into grand and definitive victories, which the reassembling and arrogance of the enemy quickly diminished. His negotiations brought about a short and unstable truce; some tribes of Barbarians were persuaded, through his generosity in gifts and promises, to take on the defense of the Rhine, but these costly and uncertain agreements did little to restore the Gallic frontier's former strength. Instead, they only disgraced the prince's dignity and drained the remaining resources of the republic. Yet, buoyed by this imagined triumph, the pretentious savior of Gaul moved into the southern provinces to face a more immediate and personal threat. Sarus the Goth was instructed to bring the rebel's head to Emperor Honorius; and the forces from Britain and Italy were wasted in this internal conflict. Following the loss of his two best generals, Justinian and Nevigastes—one killed in battle and the other in a peaceful but treacherous meeting—Constantine took refuge behind the walls of Vienna. The stronghold faced a futile siege for seven days, and the Imperial army shamefully retreated, paying for safe passage from the bandits and outlaws of the Alps. Those mountains now divided the territories of two rival kings, while the defenses along the double frontier were held by imperial troops, whose efforts would have been better spent defending Roman borders against the Barbarians of Germany and Scythia.
Chapter XXX: Revolt Of The Goths.—Part V.
On the side of the Pyrenees, the ambition of Constantine might be justified by the proximity of danger; but his throne was soon established by the conquest, or rather submission, of Spain; which yielded to the influence of regular and habitual subordination, and received the laws and magistrates of the Gallic præfecture. The only opposition which was made to the authority of Constantine proceeded not so much from the powers of government, or the spirit of the people, as from the private zeal and interest of the family of Theodosius. Four brothers had obtained, by the favor of their kinsman, the deceased emperor, an honorable rank and ample possessions in their native country; and the grateful youths resolved to risk those advantages in the service of his son. After an unsuccessful effort to maintain their ground at the head of the stationary troops of Lusitania, they retired to their estates; where they armed and levied, at their own expense, a considerable body of slaves and dependants, and boldly marched to occupy the strong posts of the Pyrenean Mountains. This domestic insurrection alarmed and perplexed the sovereign of Gaul and Britain; and he was compelled to negotiate with some troops of Barbarian auxiliaries, for the service of the Spanish war. They were distinguished by the title of Honorians; a name which might have reminded them of their fidelity to their lawful sovereign; and if it should candidly be allowed that the Scots were influenced by any partial affection for a British prince, the Moors and the Marcomanni could be tempted only by the profuse liberality of the usurper, who distributed among the Barbarians the military, and even the civil, honors of Spain. The nine bands of Honorians, which may be easily traced on the establishment of the Western empire, could not exceed the number of five thousand men: yet this inconsiderable force was sufficient to terminate a war, which had threatened the power and safety of Constantine. The rustic army of the Theodosian family was surrounded and destroyed in the Pyrenees: two of the brothers had the good fortune to escape by sea to Italy, or the East; the other two, after an interval of suspense, were executed at Arles; and if Honorius could remain insensible of the public disgrace, he might perhaps be affected by the personal misfortunes of his generous kinsmen. Such were the feeble arms which decided the possession of the Western provinces of Europe, from the wall of Antoninus to the columns of Hercules. The events of peace and war have undoubtedly been diminished by the narrow and imperfect view of the historians of the times, who were equally ignorant of the causes, and of the effects, of the most important revolutions. But the total decay of the national strength had annihilated even the last resource of a despotic government; and the revenue of exhausted provinces could no longer purchase the military service of a discontented and pusillanimous people.
On the side of the Pyrenees, Constantine's ambition might be understandable given the nearby threat; however, he quickly solidified his power through the conquest—or rather, the submission—of Spain, which fell under the influence of consistent governance and accepted the laws and officials from the Gallic prefecture. The only real challenge to Constantine’s authority came not from the government or the people's spirit, but from the personal determination and interests of the Theodosius family. Four brothers had gained, thanks to their relative, the late emperor, a respectable status and substantial property in their homeland; the grateful young men decided to risk these advantages in service to his son. After a failed attempt to hold their position at the head of the stationary troops of Lusitania, they returned to their estates, where they recruited and equipped a significant force of slaves and dependants, and boldly marched to take control of the strategic positions in the Pyrenean Mountains. This internal rebellion alarmed and confused the ruler of Gaul and Britain; he was forced to negotiate with some barbarian auxiliary troops for the Spanish campaign. They were known as Honorians, a name that might have reminded them of their loyalty to their rightful monarch; and while it could be generously argued that the Scots had some sentimental attachment to a British prince, the Moors and the Marcomanni were likely only lured by the lavish generosity of the usurper, who offered both military and even civilian honors in Spain to the barbarians. The nine units of Honorians, easily identifiable from the establishment of the Western Empire, numbered no more than five thousand men; yet this relatively small force was enough to end a conflict that had threatened Constantine’s power and safety. The rural army of the Theodosian family was surrounded and defeated in the Pyrenees: two brothers were fortunate enough to escape by sea to Italy or the East; the other two, after a period of anxiety, were executed in Arles; and while Honorius might have remained indifferent to the public disgrace, he could have been affected by the personal tragedies of his noble relatives. Such were the inadequate forces that determined the control of the Western provinces of Europe, from the wall of Antoninus to the columns of Hercules. The narrative of peace and war has certainly been simplified by the limited and flawed perspective of contemporary historians, who were equally unaware of the causes and effects of significant revolutions. However, the complete decline of national strength had obliterated even the final recourse of a despotic regime; and the revenues from exhausted provinces could no longer buy the military service of a dissatisfied and timid populace.
The poet, whose flattery has ascribed to the Roman eagle the victories of Pollentia and Verona, pursues the hasty retreat of Alaric, from the confines of Italy, with a horrid train of imaginary spectres, such as might hover over an army of Barbarians, which was almost exterminated by war, famine, and disease. In the course of this unfortunate expedition, the king of the Goths must indeed have sustained a considerable loss; and his harassed forces required an interval of repose, to recruit their numbers and revive their confidence. Adversity had exercised and displayed the genius of Alaric; and the fame of his valor invited to the Gothic standard the bravest of the Barbarian warriors; who, from the Euxine to the Rhine, were agitated by the desire of rapine and conquest. He had deserved the esteem, and he soon accepted the friendship, of Stilicho himself. Renouncing the service of the emperor of the East, Alaric concluded, with the court of Ravenna, a treaty of peace and alliance, by which he was declared master-general of the Roman armies throughout the præfecture of Illyricum; as it was claimed, according to the true and ancient limits, by the minister of Honorius. The execution of the ambitious design, which was either stipulated, or implied, in the articles of the treaty, appears to have been suspended by the formidable irruption of Radagaisus; and the neutrality of the Gothic king may perhaps be compared to the indifference of Cæsar, who, in the conspiracy of Catiline, refused either to assist, or to oppose, the enemy of the republic. After the defeat of the Vandals, Stilicho resumed his pretensions to the provinces of the East; appointed civil magistrates for the administration of justice, and of the finances; and declared his impatience to lead to the gates of Constantinople the united armies of the Romans and of the Goths. The prudence, however, of Stilicho, his aversion to civil war, and his perfect knowledge of the weakness of the state, may countenance the suspicion, that domestic peace, rather than foreign conquest, was the object of his policy; and that his principal care was to employ the forces of Alaric at a distance from Italy. This design could not long escape the penetration of the Gothic king, who continued to hold a doubtful, and perhaps a treacherous, correspondence with the rival courts; who protracted, like a dissatisfied mercenary, his languid operations in Thessaly and Epirus, and who soon returned to claim the extravagant reward of his ineffectual services. From his camp near Æmona, on the confines of Italy, he transmitted to the emperor of the West a long account of promises, of expenses, and of demands; called for immediate satisfaction, and clearly intimated the consequences of a refusal. Yet if his conduct was hostile, his language was decent and dutiful. He humbly professed himself the friend of Stilicho, and the soldier of Honorius; offered his person and his troops to march, without delay, against the usurper of Gaul; and solicited, as a permanent retreat for the Gothic nation, the possession of some vacant province of the Western empire.
The poet, whose praise has credited the Roman eagle with the victories of Pollentia and Verona, follows the swift retreat of Alaric from the borders of Italy, haunted by a terrifying trail of imaginary specters, like those that might linger over an army of Barbarians, nearly wiped out by war, famine, and disease. During this unfortunate campaign, the king of the Goths must have suffered significant losses, and his exhausted forces needed a break to rebuild their numbers and restore their confidence. Adversity had honed and showcased Alaric's skill; his reputation for bravery attracted the bravest Barbarian warriors from the Euxine to the Rhine, all driven by the desire for plunder and conquest. He earned Stilicho's respect and soon accepted his friendship. Abandoning the service of the Eastern emperor, Alaric negotiated a peace and alliance treaty with the court of Ravenna, which declared him master-general of the Roman armies throughout the prefecture of Illyricum, as claimed by Honorius' minister. The ambitious plan outlined in the treaty seems to have been put on hold by the dangerous invasion of Radagaisus, and the neutrality of the Gothic king could be likened to Julius Caesar's indifference during the Catiline conspiracy, where he neither aided nor opposed the republic's enemy. After defeating the Vandals, Stilicho resumed his claims to the eastern provinces, appointed civil officials for justice and finances, and expressed his eagerness to march the united armies of the Romans and Goths to the gates of Constantinople. However, Stilicho’s prudence, aversion to civil war, and complete understanding of the state’s weaknesses suggest that his real aim was domestic peace rather than foreign conquest, focusing on keeping Alaric’s forces away from Italy. This plan didn’t go unnoticed by the Gothic king, who maintained a questionable and possibly treacherous correspondence with rival courts; he lingered in Thessaly and Epirus like a disgruntled mercenary, and soon returned to demand a lavish reward for his unproductive services. From his camp near Æmona, on the Italian border, he sent a lengthy account to the Western emperor detailing promises, expenses, and demands; he sought immediate compensation and made it clear what would happen if his requests were ignored. Yet, while his actions were antagonistic, his words remained respectful and dutiful. He humbly called himself Stilicho's friend and Honorius' soldier, offered himself and his troops to march immediately against the usurper of Gaul, and requested land in a vacant province of the Western empire as a permanent retreat for the Gothic nation.
The political and secret transactions of two statesmen, who labored to deceive each other and the world, must forever have been concealed in the impenetrable darkness of the cabinet, if the debates of a popular assembly had not thrown some rays of light on the correspondence of Alaric and Stilicho. The necessity of finding some artificial support for a government, which, from a principle, not of moderation, but of weakness, was reduced to negotiate with its own subjects, had insensibly revived the authority of the Roman senate; and the minister of Honorius respectfully consulted the legislative council of the republic. Stilicho assembled the senate in the palace of the Cæsars; represented, in a studied oration, the actual state of affairs; proposed the demands of the Gothic king, and submitted to their consideration the choice of peace or war. The senators, as if they had been suddenly awakened from a dream of four hundred years, appeared, on this important occasion, to be inspired by the courage, rather than by the wisdom, of their predecessors. They loudly declared, in regular speeches, or in tumultuary acclamations, that it was unworthy of the majesty of Rome to purchase a precarious and disgraceful truce from a Barbarian king; and that, in the judgment of a magnanimous people, the chance of ruin was always preferable to the certainty of dishonor. The minister, whose pacific intentions were seconded only by the voice of a few servile and venal followers, attempted to allay the general ferment, by an apology for his own conduct, and even for the demands of the Gothic prince. "The payment of a subsidy, which had excited the indignation of the Romans, ought not (such was the language of Stilicho) to be considered in the odious light, either of a tribute, or of a ransom, extorted by the menaces of a Barbarian enemy. Alaric had faithfully asserted the just pretensions of the republic to the provinces which were usurped by the Greeks of Constantinople: he modestly required the fair and stipulated recompense of his services; and if he had desisted from the prosecution of his enterprise, he had obeyed, in his retreat, the peremptory, though private, letters of the emperor himself. These contradictory orders (he would not dissemble the errors of his own family) had been procured by the intercession of Serena. The tender piety of his wife had been too deeply affected by the discord of the royal brothers, the sons of her adopted father; and the sentiments of nature had too easily prevailed over the stern dictates of the public welfare." These ostensible reasons, which faintly disguise the obscure intrigues of the palace of Ravenna, were supported by the authority of Stilicho; and obtained, after a warm debate, the reluctant approbation of the senate. The tumult of virtue and freedom subsided; and the sum of four thousand pounds of gold was granted, under the name of a subsidy, to secure the peace of Italy, and to conciliate the friendship of the king of the Goths. Lampadius alone, one of the most illustrious members of the assembly, still persisted in his dissent; exclaimed, with a loud voice, "This is not a treaty of peace, but of servitude;" and escaped the danger of such bold opposition by immediately retiring to the sanctuary of a Christian church.
The political maneuvers and secret dealings between two statesmen, who were trying to trick each other and the world, would have remained forever hidden in the dark corners of the cabinet if the discussions in a public assembly hadn’t shed some light on the exchanges between Alaric and Stilicho. The need to find some form of support for a government that, not out of moderation but weakness, was forced to negotiate with its own people, had gradually revived the authority of the Roman Senate; and the minister of Honorius respectfully consulted the legislative council of the republic. Stilicho gathered the Senate in the palace of the Cæsars; he presented, in a carefully crafted speech, the current state of affairs; proposed the demands of the Gothic king, and laid before them the options of peace or war. The senators, as if suddenly waking from a four-hundred-year slumber, appeared to be inspired more by the courage of their predecessors than by their wisdom on this crucial occasion. They loudly proclaimed, in formal speeches or excited shouts, that it was beneath the dignity of Rome to buy a questionable and shameful truce from a Barbarian king; and that, in the eyes of a noble people, the risk of destruction was always better than the certainty of dishonor. The minister, whose desire for peace was backed only by a few subservient and corrupt followers, tried to calm the widespread agitation with an explanation of his actions and even of the Gothic prince's demands. "The payment of a subsidy, which had angered the Romans, should not (this was Stilicho's argument) be seen in the offensive light of a tribute or ransom, forced by the threats of a Barbarian enemy. Alaric had rightly claimed the republic's legitimate rights to the provinces taken by the Greeks of Constantinople: he modestly sought the fair payment for his services; and if he had halted his campaign, he did so in response to the urgent, though private, letters from the emperor himself. These conflicting orders (he would not hide the faults of his own family) had been obtained through the intervention of Serena. The tender concern of his wife had been deeply moved by the discord between the royal brothers, the sons of her adopted father; and her natural feelings had easily overshadowed the harsher demands of public good." These stated reasons, which barely masked the secret intrigues in the palace of Ravenna, were backed by Stilicho’s authority and gained, after a heated debate, the hesitant approval of the Senate. The uproar of virtue and freedom quieted down; and a sum of four thousand pounds of gold was granted, labeled as a subsidy, to ensure the peace of Italy and to win over the friendship of the Gothic king. Only Lampadius, one of the most prominent members of the assembly, continued to object, loudly proclaiming, "This is not a peace treaty, but a submission;" and avoided the repercussions of such bold dissent by quickly retreating to the safety of a Christian church.
[See Palace Of The Cæsars]
[See Palace of the Caesars]
But the reign of Stilicho drew towards its end; and the proud minister might perceive the symptoms of his approaching disgrace. The generous boldness of Lampadius had been applauded; and the senate, so patiently resigned to a long servitude, rejected with disdain the offer of invidious and imaginary freedom. The troops, who still assumed the name and prerogatives of the Roman legions, were exasperated by the partial affection of Stilicho for the Barbarians: and the people imputed to the mischievous policy of the minister the public misfortunes, which were the natural consequence of their own degeneracy. Yet Stilicho might have continued to brave the clamors of the people, and even of the soldiers, if he could have maintained his dominion over the feeble mind of his pupil. But the respectful attachment of Honorius was converted into fear, suspicion, and hatred. The crafty Olympius, who concealed his vices under the mask of Christian piety, had secretly undermined the benefactor, by whose favor he was promoted to the honorable offices of the Imperial palace. Olympius revealed to the unsuspecting emperor, who had attained the twenty-fifth year of his age, that he was without weight, or authority, in his own government; and artfully alarmed his timid and indolent disposition by a lively picture of the designs of Stilicho, who already meditated the death of his sovereign, with the ambitious hope of placing the diadem on the head of his son Eucherius. The emperor was instigated, by his new favorite, to assume the tone of independent dignity; and the minister was astonished to find, that secret resolutions were formed in the court and council, which were repugnant to his interest, or to his intentions. Instead of residing in the palace of Rome, Honorius declared that it was his pleasure to return to the secure fortress of Ravenna. On the first intelligence of the death of his brother Arcadius, he prepared to visit Constantinople, and to regulate, with the authority of a guardian, the provinces of the infant Theodosius. The representation of the difficulty and expense of such a distant expedition, checked this strange and sudden sally of active diligence; but the dangerous project of showing the emperor to the camp of Pavia, which was composed of the Roman troops, the enemies of Stilicho, and his Barbarian auxiliaries, remained fixed and unalterable. The minister was pressed, by the advice of his confidant, Justinian, a Roman advocate, of a lively and penetrating genius, to oppose a journey so prejudicial to his reputation and safety. His strenuous but ineffectual efforts confirmed the triumph of Olympius; and the prudent lawyer withdrew himself from the impending ruin of his patron.
But Stilicho's time in power was coming to an end, and he could sense the signs of his impending downfall. The courageous actions of Lampadius were praised, and the senate, long used to servitude, rejected the empty promises of newfound freedom. The troops, still calling themselves Roman legions, were angered by Stilicho's favoritism towards the Barbarians, and the public blamed him for their misfortunes, which were really just the result of their own decline. Still, Stilicho could have continued to ignore the public outcry and even the soldiers' anger if he had managed to keep control over his weak-minded pupil. However, Honorius's admiration turned into fear, suspicion, and resentment. The sly Olympius, who hid his true nature under a guise of Christian piety, had secretly undermined the benefactor who had promoted him to important positions in the Imperial palace. Olympius convinced the naive emperor, now 25, that he lacked influence and power in his own government and cleverly stirred his timid nature by painting a vivid picture of Stilicho's plans, which allegedly included plotting to kill him in order to crown his son Eucherius. Encouraged by his new favorite, the emperor began to act with a newly found sense of independence, leaving Stilicho shocked to discover that plans were being made in the court that opposed his interests. Instead of staying in the palace in Rome, Honorius announced he preferred to return to the safety of Ravenna. Upon learning of his brother Arcadius’s death, he prepared to go to Constantinople to oversee the territories of the young Theodosius as a guardian. However, the difficult and costly nature of such a distant trip halted this sudden burst of energy. Still, the risky plan to show off the emperor to the Roman troops at the camp of Pavia, who were against Stilicho and allied with Barbarians, remained unchanged. His advisor, Justinian, a sharp and perceptive Roman lawyer, urged him to avoid a trip so detrimental to his reputation and safety. Stilicho’s vigorous but ineffective attempts only helped Olympius gain the upper hand, and the cautious lawyer distanced himself from his patron's looming downfall.
In the passage of the emperor through Bologna, a mutiny of the guards was excited and appeased by the secret policy of Stilicho; who announced his instructions to decimate the guilty, and ascribed to his own intercession the merit of their pardon. After this tumult, Honorius embraced, for the last time, the minister whom he now considered as a tyrant, and proceeded on his way to the camp of Pavia; where he was received by the loyal acclamations of the troops who were assembled for the service of the Gallic war. On the morning of the fourth day, he pronounced, as he had been taught, a military oration in the presence of the soldiers, whom the charitable visits, and artful discourses, of Olympius had prepared to execute a dark and bloody conspiracy. At the first signal, they massacred the friends of Stilicho, the most illustrious officers of the empire; two Prætorian præfects, of Gaul and of Italy; two masters-general of the cavalry and infantry; the master of the offices; the quæstor, the treasurer, and the count of the domestics. Many lives were lost; many houses were plundered; the furious sedition continued to rage till the close of the evening; and the trembling emperor, who was seen in the streets of Pavia without his robes or diadem, yielded to the persuasions of his favorite; condemned the memory of the slain; and solemnly approved the innocence and fidelity of their assassins. The intelligence of the massacre of Pavia filled the mind of Stilicho with just and gloomy apprehensions; and he instantly summoned, in the camp of Bologna, a council of the confederate leaders, who were attached to his service, and would be involved in his ruin. The impetuous voice of the assembly called aloud for arms, and for revenge; to march, without a moment's delay, under the banners of a hero, whom they had so often followed to victory; to surprise, to oppress, to extirpate the guilty Olympius, and his degenerate Romans; and perhaps to fix the diadem on the head of their injured general. Instead of executing a resolution, which might have been justified by success, Stilicho hesitated till he was irrecoverably lost. He was still ignorant of the fate of the emperor; he distrusted the fidelity of his own party; and he viewed with horror the fatal consequences of arming a crowd of licentious Barbarians against the soldiers and people of Italy. The confederates, impatient of his timorous and doubtful delay, hastily retired, with fear and indignation. At the hour of midnight, Sarus, a Gothic warrior, renowned among the Barbarians themselves for his strength and valor, suddenly invaded the camp of his benefactor, plundered the baggage, cut in pieces the faithful Huns, who guarded his person, and penetrated to the tent, where the minister, pensive and sleepless, meditated on the dangers of his situation. Stilicho escaped with difficulty from the sword of the Goths and, after issuing a last and generous admonition to the cities of Italy, to shut their gates against the Barbarians, his confidence, or his despair, urged him to throw himself into Ravenna, which was already in the absolute possession of his enemies. Olympius, who had assumed the dominion of Honorius, was speedily informed, that his rival had embraced, as a suppliant the altar of the Christian church. The base and cruel disposition of the hypocrite was incapable of pity or remorse; but he piously affected to elude, rather than to violate, the privilege of the sanctuary. Count Heraclian, with a troop of soldiers, appeared, at the dawn of day, before the gates of the church of Ravenna. The bishop was satisfied by a solemn oath, that the Imperial mandate only directed them to secure the person of Stilicho: but as soon as the unfortunate minister had been tempted beyond the holy threshold, he produced the warrant for his instant execution. Stilicho supported, with calm resignation, the injurious names of traitor and parricide; repressed the unseasonable zeal of his followers, who were ready to attempt an ineffectual rescue; and, with a firmness not unworthy of the last of the Roman generals, submitted his neck to the sword of Heraclian.
During the emperor's visit to Bologna, there was a mutiny among the guards, stirred up and quelled by Stilicho's secretive tactics. He declared his intention to punish the guilty, but claimed credit for their pardon. After this chaos, Honorius met with the minister he now viewed as a tyrant one last time before heading to the camp at Pavia, where he was greeted by the supportive cheers of troops ready for the Gallic war. On the morning of the fourth day, he delivered a military speech to the soldiers, who had been influenced by the compassionate visits and clever speeches of Olympius to engage in a dark and violent plot. At the first signal, they brutally killed Stilicho's allies, some of the empire's most esteemed officers: two Prætorian prefects from Gaul and Italy, two commanders of cavalry and infantry, the master of the offices, the quaestor, the treasurer, and the count of the domestics. Many lives were lost, many homes were looted, and the raging riots continued until evening. The terrified emperor was seen in the streets of Pavia without his robes or crown, succumbing to the arguments of his favorite; he condemned the memory of the slain and officially endorsed the innocence and loyalty of their murderers. News of the massacre in Pavia filled Stilicho with justified dread, prompting him to call a council of his allied leaders at the Bologna camp, who were loyal to him but would also face ruin. The eager assembly demanded arms and revenge, urging immediate action under the banners of a hero they had often followed to victory, to surprise and eliminate the guilty Olympius and his corrupt Romans, or perhaps even elevate their wronged general to the throne. Instead of taking decisive action that might have been justified by success, Stilicho hesitated until it was too late. He was still unaware of the emperor's fate, doubted the loyalty of his own supporters, and was horrified by the possibility of arming a mob of unruly Barbarians against the soldiers and citizens of Italy. Frustrated by his indecisiveness, the confederates left in anger and fear. At midnight, Sarus, a renowned Gothic warrior known for his strength and bravery, suddenly attacked his benefactor's camp, looted the supplies, slaughtered the loyal Huns protecting Stilicho, and reached the tent where the anxious minister was sleeplessly contemplating his precarious situation. Stilicho narrowly escaped the Goths' swords and, after making a last earnest appeal to the cities of Italy to close their gates against the Barbarians, either out of hope or despair, chose to flee to Ravenna, which was already under the control of his enemies. Olympius, having taken control of Honorius, quickly learned that Stilicho had sought refuge at the altar of the Christian church. The dishonest and cruel Olympius felt no compassion but pretended to respect the sanctuary's protections rather than openly violate them. Count Heraclian, accompanied by soldiers, arrived at dawn before the church gates in Ravenna. The bishop was assured by a solemn oath that their orders were merely to take custody of Stilicho. However, once the unfortunate minister stepped beyond the sacred threshold, they swiftly produced the order for his immediate execution. Stilicho endured the accusations of being a traitor and a murderer with calm resignation; he silenced the impulsive zeal of his followers, who were eager to attempt a futile rescue, and with a resolve deserving of the last Roman general, he submitted his neck to Heraclian's sword.
The servile crowd of the palace, who had so long adored the fortune of Stilicho, affected to insult his fall; and the most distant connection with the master-general of the West, which had so lately been a title to wealth and honors, was studiously denied, and rigorously punished. His family, united by a triple alliance with the family of Theodosius, might envy the condition of the meanest peasant. The flight of his son Eucherius was intercepted; and the death of that innocent youth soon followed the divorce of Thermantia, who filled the place of her sister Maria; and who, like Maria, had remained a virgin in the Imperial bed. The friends of Stilicho, who had escaped the massacre of Pavia, were persecuted by the implacable revenge of Olympius; and the most exquisite cruelty was employed to extort the confession of a treasonable and sacrilegious conspiracy. They died in silence: their firmness justified the choice, and perhaps absolved the innocence of their patron: and the despotic power, which could take his life without a trial, and stigmatize his memory without a proof, has no jurisdiction over the impartial suffrage of posterity. The services of Stilicho are great and manifest; his crimes, as they are vaguely stated in the language of flattery and hatred, are obscure at least, and improbable. About four months after his death, an edict was published, in the name of Honorius, to restore the free communication of the two empires, which had been so long interrupted by the public enemy. The minister, whose fame and fortune depended on the prosperity of the state, was accused of betraying Italy to the Barbarians; whom he repeatedly vanquished at Pollentia, at Verona, and before the walls of Florence. His pretended design of placing the diadem on the head of his son Eucherius, could not have been conducted without preparations or accomplices; and the ambitious father would not surely have left the future emperor, till the twentieth year of his age, in the humble station of tribune of the notaries. Even the religion of Stilicho was arraigned by the malice of his rival. The seasonable, and almost miraculous, deliverance was devoutly celebrated by the applause of the clergy; who asserted, that the restoration of idols, and the persecution of the church, would have been the first measure of the reign of Eucherius. The son of Stilicho, however, was educated in the bosom of Christianity, which his father had uniformly professed, and zealously supported. Serena had borrowed her magnificent necklace from the statue of Vesta; and the Pagans execrated the memory of the sacrilegious minister, by whose order the Sibylline books, the oracles of Rome, had been committed to the flames. The pride and power of Stilicho constituted his real guilt. An honorable reluctance to shed the blood of his countrymen appears to have contributed to the success of his unworthy rival; and it is the last humiliation of the character of Honorius, that posterity has not condescended to reproach him with his base ingratitude to the guardian of his youth, and the support of his empire.
The subservient crowd at the palace, who had long admired Stilicho's fortune, pretended to mock his downfall; and any connection to the master-general of the West, which had recently meant wealth and prestige, was deliberately denied and punished. His family, tied through a threefold alliance with Theodosius's family, would have envied the status of the lowest peasant. His son Eucherius's escape was thwarted, and shortly after, that innocent young man died, following the divorce of Thermantia, who took his sister Maria's place and, like Maria, remained a virgin in the Imperial bed. Stilicho's friends who survived the massacre at Pavia were relentlessly hunted down by Olympius's vengeful fury; extreme cruelty was used to force confessions of treasonous and sacrilegious plots. They died in silence: their resolve vindicated their choice and perhaps cleared their patron's name. The tyrannical power that could end his life without a trial and tarnish his memory without evidence has no authority over the fair judgment of history. Stilicho's accomplishments are clear and substantial; his alleged crimes, as articulated through flattery and animosity, are at least obscure and unconvincing. About four months after his death, an edict was issued in Honorius's name to restore open communication between the two empires, which had long been disrupted by the public enemy. The minister, whose reputation and success were tied to the state's well-being, was accused of betraying Italy to the Barbarians, whom he had repeatedly defeated at Pollentia, Verona, and outside Florence. His supposed plan to crown his son Eucherius could not have been executed without prep or accomplices; an ambitious father would not have left his future emperor in the lowly role of tribune of notaries until his twentieth year. Even Stilicho's faith was attacked by his rival's spite. The timely, and nearly miraculous, rescue was celebrated by the clergy, who claimed that restoring idols and persecuting the church would have been the first acts under Eucherius's reign. However, Stilicho's son was raised within the principles of Christianity, which his father had consistently professed and fervently defended. Serena had borrowed her splendid necklace from the statue of Vesta; and Pagans cursed the memory of the sacrilegious minister, under whose orders the Sibylline books—the oracles of Rome—were burned. The arrogance and power of Stilicho were his true faults. His honorable reluctance to spill the blood of his countrymen seems to have aided his undeserving rival, and it is the final degradation of Honorius's character that history has not stooped to accuse him of his shameful ingratitude toward the guardian of his youth and the pillar of his empire.
Among the train of dependants whose wealth and dignity attracted the notice of their own times, our curiosity is excited by the celebrated name of the poet Claudian, who enjoyed the favor of Stilicho, and was overwhelmed in the ruin of his patron. The titular offices of tribune and notary fixed his rank in the Imperial court: he was indebted to the powerful intercession of Serena for his marriage with a very rich heiress of the province of Africa; and the statute of Claudian, erected in the forum of Trajan, was a monument of the taste and liberality of the Roman senate. After the praises of Stilicho became offensive and criminal, Claudian was exposed to the enmity of a powerful and unforgiving courtier, whom he had provoked by the insolence of wit. He had compared, in a lively epigram, the opposite characters of two Prætorian præfects of Italy; he contrasts the innocent repose of a philosopher, who sometimes resigned the hours of business to slumber, perhaps to study, with the interesting diligence of a rapacious minister, indefatigable in the pursuit of unjust or sacrilegious, gain. "How happy," continues Claudian, "how happy might it be for the people of Italy, if Mallius could be constantly awake, and if Hadrian would always sleep!" The repose of Mallius was not disturbed by this friendly and gentle admonition; but the cruel vigilance of Hadrian watched the opportunity of revenge, and easily obtained, from the enemies of Stilicho, the trifling sacrifice of an obnoxious poet. The poet concealed himself, however, during the tumult of the revolution; and, consulting the dictates of prudence rather than of honor, he addressed, in the form of an epistle, a suppliant and humble recantation to the offended præfect. He deplores, in mournful strains, the fatal indiscretion into which he had been hurried by passion and folly; submits to the imitation of his adversary the generous examples of the clemency of gods, of heroes, and of lions; and expresses his hope that the magnanimity of Hadrian will not trample on a defenceless and contemptible foe, already humbled by disgrace and poverty, and deeply wounded by the exile, the tortures, and the death of his dearest friends. Whatever might be the success of his prayer, or the accidents of his future life, the period of a few years levelled in the grave the minister and the poet: but the name of Hadrian is almost sunk in oblivion, while Claudian is read with pleasure in every country which has retained, or acquired, the knowledge of the Latin language. If we fairly balance his merits and his defects, we shall acknowledge that Claudian does not either satisfy, or silence, our reason. It would not be easy to produce a passage that deserves the epithet of sublime or pathetic; to select a verse that melts the heart or enlarges the imagination. We should vainly seek, in the poems of Claudian, the happy invention, and artificial conduct, of an interesting fable; or the just and lively representation of the characters and situations of real life. For the service of his patron, he published occasional panegyrics and invectives: and the design of these slavish compositions encouraged his propensity to exceed the limits of truth and nature. These imperfections, however, are compensated in some degree by the poetical virtues of Claudian. He was endowed with the rare and precious talent of raising the meanest, of adorning the most barren, and of diversifying the most similar, topics: his coloring, more especially in descriptive poetry, is soft and splendid; and he seldom fails to display, and even to abuse, the advantages of a cultivated understanding, a copious fancy, an easy, and sometimes forcible, expression; and a perpetual flow of harmonious versification. To these commendations, independent of any accidents of time and place, we must add the peculiar merit which Claudian derived from the unfavorable circumstances of his birth. In the decline of arts, and of empire, a native of Egypt, who had received the education of a Greek, assumed, in a mature age, the familiar use, and absolute command, of the Latin language; soared above the heads of his feeble contemporaries; and placed himself, after an interval of three hundred years, among the poets of ancient Rome.
Among the group of dependents whose wealth and status caught the attention of their time, our curiosity is sparked by the famous poet Claudian, who was favored by Stilicho and fell into ruin with his patron. His titles of tribune and notary established his rank in the Imperial court; he owed his marriage to a wealthy heiress from Africa to the influential support of Serena. The statue of Claudian, erected in the forum of Trajan, served as a testament to the taste and generosity of the Roman senate. When praises of Stilicho became unwelcome and treasonous, Claudian faced hostility from a powerful and unforgiving courtier, whom he had angered with his sharp wit. He had playfully compared the contrasting characters of two Prætorian præfects in a lively epigram, juxtaposing the serene idleness of a philosopher who occasionally dozed off, perhaps to study, against the relentless ambition of a greedy minister, tireless in his pursuit of unjust or sacrilegious gains. "How fortunate," Claudian continued, "how fortunate it would be for the people of Italy, if Mallius could always be awake, and if Hadrian would always sleep!" Mallius remained undisturbed by this friendly and gentle reminder; however, Hadrian's cruel vigilance seized the chance for revenge and easily obtained, from Stilicho's enemies, the minor sacrifice of an unwelcome poet. The poet, however, hid himself during the chaos of the revolution; prioritizing prudence over honor, he penned a humble and pleading letter of recantation to the offended præfect. He mournfully lamented the disastrous indiscretion into which passion and folly had led him; he urged his adversary to adopt the generous examples of the clemency shown by gods, heroes, and lions; and he expressed hope that Hadrian's greatness would not trample on someone defenseless and despicable, already humbled by disgrace and poverty and deeply wounded by the exile, torture, and death of his closest friends. Regardless of the outcome of his plea or the events of his future, the passage of a few years brought the minister and the poet to the grave: yet Hadrian's name has nearly faded into oblivion, while Claudian is enjoyed in every country that has kept or gained knowledge of the Latin language. If we weigh his strengths and weaknesses fairly, we will see that Claudian neither satisfies nor silences our reason. It would be difficult to find a passage that deserves to be called sublime or touching; nor can we select a verse that stirs the heart or expands the imagination. We would futilely search through Claudian's poems for delightful invention or the careful crafting of an engaging story; or the accurate and vivid portrayal of the characters and situations of real life. In service of his patron, he published occasional praises and critiques: and the purpose of these servile compositions encouraged his tendency to cross the boundaries of truth and nature. However, these flaws are somewhat offset by Claudian's poetic strengths. He possessed the rare and valuable ability to elevate the simplest subjects, embellish the most barren topics, and diversify the most similar themes: his imagery, especially in descriptive poetry, is rich and vivid; and he rarely misses the chance to showcase, and sometimes misuse, the advantages of a well-cultivated mind, abundant imagination, smooth and, at times, powerful expression; along with a constant flow of melodic verse. To these praises, regardless of the circumstances of time and place, we must add the unique merit that Claudian gained from the unfavorable conditions of his birth. In a time of declining arts and empire, a native of Egypt who had received a Greek education took on, in adulthood, the practical use and complete command of the Latin language; he rose above his weaker contemporaries and positioned himself, after a gap of three hundred years, among the poets of ancient Rome.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part I.
Invasion Of Italy By Alaric.—Manners Of The Roman Senate And People.—Rome Is Thrice Besieged, And At Length Pillaged, By The Goths.—Death Of Alaric.—The Goths Evacuate Italy.—Fall Of Constantine.—Gaul And Spain Are Occupied By The Barbarians.—Independence Of Britain.
Invasion of Italy by Alaric.—Customs of the Roman Senate and People.—Rome is besieged three times and finally looted by the Goths.—Death of Alaric.—The Goths leave Italy.—Fall of Constantine.—Gaul and Spain are taken over by the Barbarians.—Independence of Britain.
The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may often assume the appearance, and produce the effects, of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy. If Alaric himself had been introduced into the council of Ravenna, he would probably have advised the same measures which were actually pursued by the ministers of Honorius. The king of the Goths would have conspired, perhaps with some reluctance, to destroy the formidable adversary, by whose arms, in Italy, as well as in Greece, he had been twice overthrown. Their active and interested hatred laboriously accomplished the disgrace and ruin of the great Stilicho. The valor of Sarus, his fame in arms, and his personal, or hereditary, influence over the confederate Barbarians, could recommend him only to the friends of their country, who despised, or detested, the worthless characters of Turpilio, Varanes, and Vigilantius. By the pressing instances of the new favorites, these generals, unworthy as they had shown themselves of the names of soldiers, were promoted to the command of the cavalry, of the infantry, and of the domestic troops. The Gothic prince would have subscribed with pleasure the edict which the fanaticism of Olympius dictated to the simple and devout emperor. Honorius excluded all persons, who were adverse to the Catholic church, from holding any office in the state; obstinately rejected the service of all those who dissented from his religion; and rashly disqualified many of his bravest and most skilful officers, who adhered to the Pagan worship, or who had imbibed the opinions of Arianism. These measures, so advantageous to an enemy, Alaric would have approved, and might perhaps have suggested; but it may seem doubtful, whether the Barbarian would have promoted his interest at the expense of the inhuman and absurd cruelty which was perpetrated by the direction, or at least with the connivance of the Imperial ministers. The foreign auxiliaries, who had been attached to the person of Stilicho, lamented his death; but the desire of revenge was checked by a natural apprehension for the safety of their wives and children; who were detained as hostages in the strong cities of Italy, where they had likewise deposited their most valuable effects. At the same hour, and as if by a common signal, the cities of Italy were polluted by the same horrid scenes of universal massacre and pillage, which involved, in promiscuous destruction, the families and fortunes of the Barbarians. Exasperated by such an injury, which might have awakened the tamest and most servile spirit, they cast a look of indignation and hope towards the camp of Alaric, and unanimously swore to pursue, with just and implacable war, the perfidious nation who had so basely violated the laws of hospitality. By the imprudent conduct of the ministers of Honorius, the republic lost the assistance, and deserved the enmity, of thirty thousand of her bravest soldiers; and the weight of that formidable army, which alone might have determined the event of the war, was transferred from the scale of the Romans into that of the Goths.
The weakness and distractions of a struggling government can often look like treasonous dealings with the enemy. If Alaric himself had joined the council of Ravenna, he likely would have suggested the same strategies that Honorius's ministers were actually implementing. The king of the Goths might have reluctantly agreed to eliminate the powerful adversary who had twice defeated him in Italy and Greece. Their active and self-serving hatred led to the disgrace and downfall of the great Stilicho. The bravery of Sarus, his reputation as a warrior, and his influence over the allied Barbarians could only win him favor among those who valued their homeland, while looking down on the worthless characters of Turpilio, Varanes, and Vigilantius. Due to the pressing demands of the new favorites, these generals, who had proven themselves unworthy of the title of soldiers, were promoted to lead the cavalry, infantry, and household troops. The Gothic prince would have willingly supported the edict that the fanatic Olympius dictated to the simple and devout emperor. Honorius excluded anyone opposed to the Catholic Church from holding any office in the state, stubbornly rejected the service of those who disagreed with his faith, and carelessly disqualified many of his bravest and most skilled officers who practiced Paganism or held Arian beliefs. Alaric would have endorsed these moves, which greatly benefited an enemy, and might have even suggested them; however, it’s questionable whether he would have compromised his interests for the inhumane and absurd cruelty carried out under the direction, or at least with the approval, of the Imperial ministers. The foreign allies closely associated with Stilicho mourned his death, but their desire for revenge was tempered by natural concerns for the safety of their wives and children, who were held as hostages in the strong cities of Italy, where they had also stored their most valuable possessions. At the same time, as if by a common signal, the cities of Italy were tarnished by horrific scenes of widespread massacre and looting, which indiscriminately destroyed the families and fortunes of the Barbarians. Angered by such a wrong, which could have stirred even the most subdued spirit, they looked toward Alaric’s camp with indignation and hope, and unanimously vowed to wage relentless and just war against the treacherous nation that had so shamelessly violated the rules of hospitality. Because of the ill-conceived actions of Honorius's ministers, the republic lost the support and rightly earned the enmity of thirty thousand of its bravest soldiers, and the strength of that formidable army, which could have influenced the outcome of the war, shifted from the Romans to the Goths.
In the arts of negotiation, as well as in those of war, the Gothic king maintained his superior ascendant over an enemy, whose seeming changes proceeded from the total want of counsel and design. From his camp, on the confines of Italy, Alaric attentively observed the revolutions of the palace, watched the progress of faction and discontent, disguised the hostile aspect of a Barbarian invader, and assumed the more popular appearance of the friend and ally of the great Stilicho: to whose virtues, when they were no longer formidable, he could pay a just tribute of sincere praise and regret. The pressing invitation of the malecontents, who urged the king of the Goths to invade Italy, was enforced by a lively sense of his personal injuries; and he might especially complain, that the Imperial ministers still delayed and eluded the payment of the four thousand pounds of gold which had been granted by the Roman senate, either to reward his services, or to appease his fury. His decent firmness was supported by an artful moderation, which contributed to the success of his designs. He required a fair and reasonable satisfaction; but he gave the strongest assurances, that, as soon as he had obtained it, he would immediately retire. He refused to trust the faith of the Romans, unless Ætius and Jason, the sons of two great officers of state, were sent as hostages to his camp; but he offered to deliver, in exchange, several of the noblest youths of the Gothic nation. The modesty of Alaric was interpreted, by the ministers of Ravenna, as a sure evidence of his weakness and fear. They disdained either to negotiate a treaty, or to assemble an army; and with a rash confidence, derived only from their ignorance of the extreme danger, irretrievably wasted the decisive moments of peace and war. While they expected, in sullen silence, that the Barbarians would evacuate the confines of Italy, Alaric, with bold and rapid marches, passed the Alps and the Po; hastily pillaged the cities of Aquileia, Altinum, Concordia, and Cremona, which yielded to his arms; increased his forces by the accession of thirty thousand auxiliaries; and, without meeting a single enemy in the field, advanced as far as the edge of the morass which protected the impregnable residence of the emperor of the West. Instead of attempting the hopeless siege of Ravenna, the prudent leader of the Goths proceeded to Rimini, stretched his ravages along the sea-coast of the Hadriatic, and meditated the conquest of the ancient mistress of the world. An Italian hermit, whose zeal and sanctity were respected by the Barbarians themselves, encountered the victorious monarch, and boldly denounced the indignation of Heaven against the oppressors of the earth; but the saint himself was confounded by the solemn asseveration of Alaric, that he felt a secret and præternatural impulse, which directed, and even compelled, his march to the gates of Rome. He felt, that his genius and his fortune were equal to the most arduous enterprises; and the enthusiasm which he communicated to the Goths, insensibly removed the popular, and almost superstitious, reverence of the nations for the majesty of the Roman name. His troops, animated by the hopes of spoil, followed the course of the Flaminian way, occupied the unguarded passes of the Apennine, descended into the rich plains of Umbria; and, as they lay encamped on the banks of the Clitumnus, might wantonly slaughter and devour the milk-white oxen, which had been so long reserved for the use of Roman triumphs. A lofty situation, and a seasonable tempest of thunder and lightning, preserved the little city of Narni; but the king of the Goths, despising the ignoble prey, still advanced with unabated vigor; and after he had passed through the stately arches, adorned with the spoils of Barbaric victories, he pitched his camp under the walls of Rome.
In the art of negotiation, just like in war, the Gothic king held a clear advantage over an enemy whose apparent shifts were due to a complete lack of strategy and planning. From his camp near Italy, Alaric closely watched the changes at the palace, kept an eye on the factions and discontent, concealed the threatening image of a Barbarian invader, and took on a more appealing role as the friend and ally of the great Stilicho. Once Stilicho was no longer a threat, Alaric could genuinely express admiration and regret for his virtues. The urgent pleas from the discontented, who pushed the king of the Goths to invade Italy, were amplified by Alaric's strong feelings about his personal grievances; he could especially complain that the Imperial officials had still not paid the four thousand pounds of gold promised by the Roman senate, either to reward his efforts or to calm him down. His suitable firmness was backed by a clever moderation that aided the success of his plans. He sought fair and reasonable compensation but promised strongly that once he got it, he would withdraw immediately. He refused to trust the Romans unless Ætius and Jason, the sons of two important state officials, were sent as hostages to his camp; in return, he offered several of the most noble young men from the Gothic nation. The ministers in Ravenna viewed Alaric's modesty as a clear sign of his weakness and fear. They dismissed the idea of negotiating a treaty or gathering an army; with reckless confidence stemming from their ignorance of the serious threat, they wasted the crucial moments for peace and war. While they waited in gloomy silence for the Barbarians to leave the borders of Italy, Alaric swiftly crossed the Alps and the Po, quickly looted the cities of Aquileia, Altinum, Concordia, and Cremona, which surrendered to him; he bolstered his forces with thirty thousand additional troops; and without facing a single enemy, advanced to the edge of the swamp protecting the emperor of the West’s stronghold. Rather than attempt the futile siege of Ravenna, the wise leader of the Goths moved to Rimini, spreading his destruction along the Adriatic coast, and planned the conquest of the ancient ruler of the world. An Italian hermit, respected for his zeal and sanctity even by the Barbarians, met the victorious king and boldly proclaimed God's wrath against the oppressors of the earth; but even the saint was stunned by Alaric's solemn assertion that he felt a secret, supernatural force guiding and even forcing his march to the gates of Rome. He sensed that his destiny and luck were suited for the toughest challenges; the enthusiasm he inspired in the Goths gradually diminished the nations' popular and almost superstitious reverence for the Roman name. His troops, motivated by hopes of plunder, followed the Flaminian way, occupied the unguarded mountain passes of the Apennines, descended into the lush plains of Umbria; and, camped by the Clitumnus River, they wantonly slaughtered and consumed the milk-white oxen long reserved for Roman triumphs. A high location and a well-timed storm of thunder and lightning saved the small city of Narni, but the Gothic king, ignoring the unremarkable spoils, continued to advance with relentless energy; and after he passed through the grand arches adorned with the trophies of Barbarian victories, he set up camp under the walls of Rome.
During a period of six hundred and nineteen years, the seat of empire had never been violated by the presence of a foreign enemy. The unsuccessful expedition of Hannibal served only to display the character of the senate and people; of a senate degraded, rather than ennobled, by the comparison of an assembly of kings; and of a people, to whom the ambassador of Pyrrhus ascribed the inexhaustible resources of the Hydra. Each of the senators, in the time of the Punic war, had accomplished his term of the military service, either in a subordinate or a superior station; and the decree, which invested with temporary command all those who had been consuls, or censors, or dictators, gave the republic the immediate assistance of many brave and experienced generals. In the beginning of the war, the Roman people consisted of two hundred and fifty thousand citizens of an age to bear arms. Fifty thousand had already died in the defence of their country; and the twenty-three legions which were employed in the different camps of Italy, Greece, Sardinia, Sicily, and Spain, required about one hundred thousand men. But there still remained an equal number in Rome, and the adjacent territory, who were animated by the same intrepid courage; and every citizen was trained, from his earliest youth, in the discipline and exercises of a soldier. Hannibal was astonished by the constancy of the senate, who, without raising the siege of Capua, or recalling their scattered forces, expected his approach. He encamped on the banks of the Anio, at the distance of three miles from the city; and he was soon informed, that the ground on which he had pitched his tent, was sold for an adequate price at a public auction; and that a body of troops was dismissed by an opposite road, to reënforce the legions of Spain. He led his Africans to the gates of Rome, where he found three armies in order of battle, prepared to receive him; but Hannibal dreaded the event of a combat, from which he could not hope to escape, unless he destroyed the last of his enemies; and his speedy retreat confessed the invincible courage of the Romans.
For six hundred and nineteen years, the heart of the empire had never been threatened by a foreign enemy. The failed campaign of Hannibal only highlighted the nature of the senate and the people; a senate diminished rather than elevated by its comparison to a gathering of kings, and a populace that the ambassador of Pyrrhus credited with the endless resources of the Hydra. Each senator during the Punic War had completed his military service, either in a lower or higher position; and the decree that granted temporary command to all former consuls, censors, or dictators provided the republic with immediate support from many brave and seasoned generals. At the start of the war, the Roman population included two hundred fifty thousand citizens of fighting age. Fifty thousand had already perished defending their nation, and the twenty-three legions stationed in various camps in Italy, Greece, Sardinia, Sicily, and Spain required around one hundred thousand soldiers. However, an equal number remained in Rome and the surrounding area, filled with the same fearless spirit; every citizen was trained from a young age in military discipline and exercises. Hannibal was amazed by the resolve of the senate, who, not lifting the siege of Capua or recalling their scattered forces, awaited his arrival. He set up camp on the banks of the Anio, three miles from the city, and soon learned that the land where he had pitched his tent had been sold for a fair price at auction, and that a group of troops had been sent along a different route to reinforce the legions in Spain. He brought his African troops to the gates of Rome, where he found three armies lined up and ready to face him; but Hannibal feared the outcome of a battle from which he could only escape by annihilating his last enemy, and his hasty retreat revealed the unbeatable bravery of the Romans.
From the time of the Punic war, the uninterrupted succession of senators had preserved the name and image of the republic; and the degenerate subjects of Honorius ambitiously derived their descent from the heroes who had repulsed the arms of Hannibal, and subdued the nations of the earth. The temporal honors which the devout Paula inherited and despised, are carefully recapitulated by Jerom, the guide of her conscience, and the historian of her life. The genealogy of her father, Rogatus, which ascended as high as Agamemnon, might seem to betray a Grecian origin; but her mother, Blæsilla, numbered the Scipios, Æmilius Paulus, and the Gracchi, in the list of her ancestors; and Toxotius, the husband of Paula, deduced his royal lineage from Æneas, the father of the Julian line. The vanity of the rich, who desired to be noble, was gratified by these lofty pretensions. Encouraged by the applause of their parasites, they easily imposed on the credulity of the vulgar; and were countenanced, in some measure, by the custom of adopting the name of their patron, which had always prevailed among the freedmen and clients of illustrious families. Most of those families, however, attacked by so many causes of external violence or internal decay, were gradually extirpated; and it would be more reasonable to seek for a lineal descent of twenty generations, among the mountains of the Alps, or in the peaceful solitude of Apulia, than on the theatre of Rome, the seat of fortune, of danger, and of perpetual revolutions. Under each successive reign, and from every province of the empire, a crowd of hardy adventurers, rising to eminence by their talents or their vices, usurped the wealth, the honors, and the palaces of Rome; and oppressed, or protected, the poor and humble remains of consular families; who were ignorant, perhaps, of the glory of their ancestors.
Since the time of the Punic War, the steady line of senators had kept alive the name and image of the republic; and the corrupted subjects of Honorius proudly traced their lineage back to the heroes who had defeated Hannibal and conquered the nations of the earth. The worldly honors that the devout Paula inherited and looked down upon are thoroughly summarized by Jerom, the leader of her conscience and the historian of her life. Her father Rogatus's lineage, which went back as far as Agamemnon, might suggest a Greek origin; but her mother, Blæsilla, counted Scipios, Æmilius Paulus, and the Gracchi among her ancestors; and Toxotius, Paula's husband, claimed his royal ancestry from Æneas, the father of the Julian line. The vanity of the wealthy, who wished to be noble, was satisfied by these lofty claims. Cheered on by the praise of their flunkies, they easily duped the gullibility of the masses; and they were somewhat supported by the common practice of adopting the name of their patron, which had always been common among the freedmen and clients of distinguished families. However, most of those families, struck by various forms of external violence or internal decline, were gradually wiped out; and it would be more sensible to search for a direct lineage spanning twenty generations in the mountains of the Alps or in the tranquil solitude of Apulia than in the arena of Rome, the hub of fortune, danger, and constant upheaval. Under each new reign, and from every province of the empire, a wave of daring adventurers, rising to prominence through their skills or their vices, seized the wealth, honors, and palaces of Rome; and they either oppressed or protected the dwindling and humble remains of consular families, who might have been unaware of their ancestors' glory.
In the time of Jerom and Claudian, the senators unanimously yielded the preeminence to the Anician line; and a slight view of their history will serve to appreciate the rank and antiquity of the noble families, which contended only for the second place. During the five first ages of the city, the name of the Anicians was unknown; they appear to have derived their origin from Præneste; and the ambition of those new citizens was long satisfied with the Plebeian honors of tribunes of the people. One hundred and sixty-eight years before the Christian æra, the family was ennobled by the Prætorship of Anicius, who gloriously terminated the Illyrian war, by the conquest of the nation, and the captivity of their king. From the triumph of that general, three consulships, in distant periods, mark the succession of the Anician name. From the reign of Diocletian to the final extinction of the Western empire, that name shone with a lustre which was not eclipsed, in the public estimation, by the majesty of the Imperial purple. The several branches, to whom it was communicated, united, by marriage or inheritance, the wealth and titles of the Annian, the Petronian, and the Olybrian houses; and in each generation the number of consulships was multiplied by an hereditary claim. The Anician family excelled in faith and in riches: they were the first of the Roman senate who embraced Christianity; and it is probable that Anicius Julian, who was afterwards consul and præfect of the city, atoned for his attachment to the party of Maxentius, by the readiness with which he accepted the religion of Constantine. Their ample patrimony was increased by the industry of Probus, the chief of the Anician family; who shared with Gratian the honors of the consulship, and exercised, four times, the high office of Prætorian præfect. His immense estates were scattered over the wide extent of the Roman world; and though the public might suspect or disapprove the methods by which they had been acquired, the generosity and magnificence of that fortunate statesman deserved the gratitude of his clients, and the admiration of strangers. Such was the respect entertained for his memory, that the two sons of Probus, in their earliest youth, and at the request of the senate, were associated in the consular dignity; a memorable distinction, without example, in the annals of Rome.
During the time of Jerom and Claudian, the senators all agreed to give the Anician line the top spot; a brief look at their history will help us understand the importance and long-standing nature of the noble families that only aspired to the second position. In the first five centuries of the city, the name of the Anicians was not known; they seem to have come from Præneste, and for a long time, their ambitions were satisfied with the Plebeian honors of tribunes of the people. One hundred sixty-eight years before the Christian era, the family gained nobility when Anicius held the praetorship and successfully ended the Illyrian war by conquering the nation and capturing their king. From that general's triumph, the Anician name marked its presence with three consulships at different times. From Diocletian's reign to the eventual fall of the Western empire, that name shone brightly, not overshadowed in public opinion by the prestige of imperial power. Various branches of the family intermarried or inherited the wealth and titles of the Annian, Petronian, and Olybrian houses, causing the number of consulships to increase with each generation due to hereditary claims. The Anician family was notable for their faith and wealth: they were the first members of the Roman senate to adopt Christianity; it is likely that Anicius Julian, who later became consul and city prefect, made amends for his support of Maxentius by quickly embracing the religion of Constantine. Their vast inheritance was further augmented by Probus, the head of the Anician family; he shared the honors of the consulship with Gratian and served as Praetorian prefect four times. His enormous estates spanned the vast Roman world; although the public may have suspected or disapproved of how they were gained, the generosity and grandeur of that successful statesman earned him the gratitude of his clients and the admiration of outsiders. His memory was so respected that Probus's two sons, at a very young age and at the senate's request, were granted the consular rank; a remarkable honor, unmatched in the history of Rome.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part II.
"The marbles of the Anician palace," were used as a proverbial expression of opulence and splendor; but the nobles and senators of Rome aspired, in due gradation, to imitate that illustrious family. The accurate description of the city, which was composed in the Theodosian age, enumerates one thousand seven hundred and eighty houses, the residence of wealthy and honorable citizens. Many of these stately mansions might almost excuse the exaggeration of the poet; that Rome contained a multitude of palaces, and that each palace was equal to a city: since it included within its own precincts every thing which could be subservient either to use or luxury; markets, hippodromes, temples, fountains, baths, porticos, shady groves, and artificial aviaries. The historian Olympiodorus, who represents the state of Rome when it was besieged by the Goths, continues to observe, that several of the richest senators received from their estates an annual income of four thousand pounds of gold, above one hundred and sixty thousand pounds sterling; without computing the stated provision of corn and wine, which, had they been sold, might have equalled in value one third of the money. Compared to this immoderate wealth, an ordinary revenue of a thousand or fifteen hundred pounds of gold might be considered as no more than adequate to the dignity of the senatorian rank, which required many expenses of a public and ostentatious kind. Several examples are recorded, in the age of Honorius, of vain and popular nobles, who celebrated the year of their prætorship by a festival, which lasted seven days, and cost above one hundred thousand pounds sterling. The estates of the Roman senators, which so far exceeded the proportion of modern wealth, were not confined to the limits of Italy. Their possessions extended far beyond the Ionian and Ægean Seas, to the most distant provinces: the city of Nicopolis, which Augustus had founded as an eternal monument of the Actian victory, was the property of the devout Paula; and it is observed by Seneca, that the rivers, which had divided hostile nations, now flowed through the lands of private citizens. According to their temper and circumstances, the estates of the Romans were either cultivated by the labor of their slaves, or granted, for a certain and stipulated rent, to the industrious farmer. The economical writers of antiquity strenuously recommend the former method, wherever it may be practicable; but if the object should be removed, by its distance or magnitude, from the immediate eye of the master, they prefer the active care of an old hereditary tenant, attached to the soil, and interested in the produce, to the mercenary administration of a negligent, perhaps an unfaithful, steward.
"The marbles of the Anician palace" became a common saying for wealth and luxury, inspiring Rome’s nobles and senators to emulate that renowned family. A precise account of the city from the Theodosian era lists one thousand seven hundred and eighty houses, which were homes to wealthy and reputable citizens. Many of these impressive mansions could almost justify the poet's exaggeration that Rome was full of palaces, each equivalent to a city. Each palace included everything that could cater to both necessity and luxury: markets, hippodromes, temples, fountains, baths, porticos, shady groves, and artificial aviaries. Historian Olympiodorus, describing Rome during the Gothic siege, notes that some of the wealthiest senators earned an annual income from their estates of four thousand pounds of gold, over one hundred sixty thousand pounds sterling, not including the regular supply of grain and wine, which if sold, could have been worth one third of that amount. In comparison to this extreme wealth, a typical revenue of one thousand or fifteen hundred pounds of gold was merely seen as adequate for the status of a senator, which required numerous public and extravagant expenses. During Honorius's time, there are several accounts of vain and popular nobles who celebrated their year in office with a week-long festival costing over one hundred thousand pounds sterling. The Roman senators’ estates, which far surpassed modern wealth, extended beyond Italy. Their holdings reached far beyond the Ionian and Aegean Seas, into the most distant provinces. The city of Nicopolis, founded by Augustus as a lasting tribute to the Actian victory, belonged to the pious Paula. Seneca remarked that rivers, once separating hostile nations, now flowed through the lands of private citizens. Depending on their circumstances and temperament, Romans either cultivated their estates with slave labor or rented them to hardworking farmers for agreed-upon amounts. Ancient economic writers strongly recommend the former method whenever feasible; however, if the property is too distant or large for the owner to oversee directly, they prefer the dedicated care of a long-standing tenant who is invested in the land over the careless management of a potentially untrustworthy steward.
The opulent nobles of an immense capital, who were never excited by the pursuit of military glory, and seldom engaged in the occupations of civil government, naturally resigned their leisure to the business and amusements of private life. At Rome, commerce was always held in contempt: but the senators, from the first age of the republic, increased their patrimony, and multiplied their clients, by the lucrative practice of usury; and the obsolete laws were eluded, or violated, by the mutual inclinations and interest of both parties. A considerable mass of treasure must always have existed at Rome, either in the current coin of the empire, or in the form of gold and silver plate; and there were many sideboards in the time of Pliny which contained more solid silver, than had been transported by Scipio from vanquished Carthage. The greater part of the nobles, who dissipated their fortunes in profuse luxury, found themselves poor in the midst of wealth, and idle in a constant round of dissipation. Their desires were continually gratified by the labor of a thousand hands; of the numerous train of their domestic slaves, who were actuated by the fear of punishment; and of the various professions of artificers and merchants, who were more powerfully impelled by the hopes of gain. The ancients were destitute of many of the conveniences of life, which have been invented or improved by the progress of industry; and the plenty of glass and linen has diffused more real comforts among the modern nations of Europe, than the senators of Rome could derive from all the refinements of pompous or sensual luxury. Their luxury, and their manners, have been the subject of minute and laborious disposition: but as such inquiries would divert me too long from the design of the present work, I shall produce an authentic state of Rome and its inhabitants, which is more peculiarly applicable to the period of the Gothic invasion. Ammianus Marcellinus, who prudently chose the capital of the empire as the residence the best adapted to the historian of his own times, has mixed with the narrative of public events a lively representation of the scenes with which he was familiarly conversant. The judicious reader will not always approve of the asperity of censure, the choice of circumstances, or the style of expression; he will perhaps detect the latent prejudices, and personal resentments, which soured the temper of Ammianus himself; but he will surely observe, with philosophic curiosity, the interesting and original picture of the manners of Rome.
The wealthy nobles of a vast capital, who were never really interested in seeking military glory and rarely involved themselves in governmental duties, naturally devoted their free time to personal affairs and entertainment. In Rome, commerce was generally looked down upon; however, the senators, from the beginning of the republic, grew their wealth and increased their followers through the profitable practice of usury. They evaded or broke outdated laws thanks to mutual interests and desires. A significant amount of wealth must have always existed in Rome, either as the currency of the empire or as gold and silver valuables; many dining tables during Pliny's time held more solid silver than what Scipio brought back from the defeated Carthage. Most nobles, who squandered their fortunes on extravagant luxuries, found themselves broke amidst riches and idle in a never-ending cycle of excess. Their needs were constantly met by the labor of many, including their numerous household slaves, who were driven by the fear of punishment, and the various tradespeople and merchants motivated more by the hopes of profit. The ancients lacked many of the conveniences we enjoy today, which have been invented or improved by advancements in industry; the abundance of glass and linen has provided more genuine comforts to modern European nations than all the extravagant or sensual luxuries available to the Roman senators. Their luxury and lifestyles have been the subject of extensive analysis; however, as such discussions would stray too far from the focus of this work, I will present a factual account of Rome and its people, particularly relevant to the period of the Gothic invasion. Ammianus Marcellinus, who wisely chose the capital of the empire as the most fitting residence for a historian of his time, intertwined his narrative of public events with vivid depictions of the familiar scenes around him. A discerning reader may not always agree with his sharp criticisms, the circumstances he selected, or his style of writing; they might even spot the hidden biases and personal grievances that influenced Ammianus's tone. Nonetheless, they will surely find, with philosophical interest, a captivating and unique portrayal of Roman life.
"The greatness of Rome"—such is the language of the historian—"was founded on the rare, and almost incredible, alliance of virtue and of fortune. The long period of her infancy was employed in a laborious struggle against the tribes of Italy, the neighbors and enemies of the rising city. In the strength and ardor of youth, she sustained the storms of war; carried her victorious arms beyond the seas and the mountains; and brought home triumphal laurels from every country of the globe. At length, verging towards old age, and sometimes conquering by the terror only of her name, she sought the blessings of ease and tranquillity. The venerable city, which had trampled on the necks of the fiercest nations, and established a system of laws, the perpetual guardians of justice and freedom, was content, like a wise and wealthy parent, to devolve on the Cæsars, her favorite sons, the care of governing her ample patrimony. A secure and profound peace, such as had been once enjoyed in the reign of Numa, succeeded to the tumults of a republic; while Rome was still adored as the queen of the earth; and the subject nations still reverenced the name of the people, and the majesty of the senate. But this native splendor," continues Ammianus, "is degraded, and sullied, by the conduct of some nobles, who, unmindful of their own dignity, and of that of their country, assume an unbounded license of vice and folly. They contend with each other in the empty vanity of titles and surnames; and curiously select, or invent, the most lofty and sonorous appellations, Reburrus, or Fabunius, Pagonius, or Tarasius, which may impress the ears of the vulgar with astonishment and respect. From a vain ambition of perpetuating their memory, they affect to multiply their likeness, in statues of bronze and marble; nor are they satisfied, unless those statues are covered with plates of gold; an honorable distinction, first granted to Acilius the consul, after he had subdued, by his arms and counsels, the power of King Antiochus. The ostentation of displaying, of magnifying, perhaps, the rent-roll of the estates which they possess in all the provinces, from the rising to the setting sun, provokes the just resentment of every man, who recollects, that their poor and invincible ancestors were not distinguished from the meanest of the soldiers, by the delicacy of their food, or the splendor of their apparel. But the modern nobles measure their rank and consequence according to the loftiness of their chariots, and the weighty magnificence of their dress. Their long robes of silk and purple float in the wind; and as they are agitated, by art or accident, they occasionally discover the under garments, the rich tunics, embroidered with the figures of various animals. Followed by a train of fifty servants, and tearing up the pavement, they move along the streets with the same impetuous speed as if they travelled with post-horses; and the example of the senators is boldly imitated by the matrons and ladies, whose covered carriages are continually driving round the immense space of the city and suburbs. Whenever these persons of high distinction condescend to visit the public baths, they assume, on their entrance, a tone of loud and insolent command, and appropriate to their own use the conveniences which were designed for the Roman people. If, in these places of mixed and general resort, they meet any of the infamous ministers of their pleasures, they express their affection by a tender embrace; while they proudly decline the salutations of their fellow-citizens, who are not permitted to aspire above the honor of kissing their hands, or their knees. As soon as they have indulged themselves in the refreshment of the bath, they resume their rings, and the other ensigns of their dignity, select from their private wardrobe of the finest linen, such as might suffice for a dozen persons, the garments the most agreeable to their fancy, and maintain till their departure the same haughty demeanor; which perhaps might have been excused in the great Marcellus, after the conquest of Syracuse. Sometimes, indeed, these heroes undertake more arduous achievements; they visit their estates in Italy, and procure themselves, by the toil of servile hands, the amusements of the chase. If at any time, but more especially on a hot day, they have courage to sail, in their painted galleys, from the Lucrine Lake to their elegant villas on the seacoast of Puteoli and Cayeta, they compare their own expeditions to the marches of Cæsar and Alexander. Yet should a fly presume to settle on the silken folds of their gilded umbrellas; should a sunbeam penetrate through some unguarded and imperceptible chink, they deplore their intolerable hardships, and lament, in affected language, that they were not born in the land of the Cimmerians, the regions of eternal darkness. In these journeys into the country, the whole body of the household marches with their master. In the same manner as the cavalry and infantry, the heavy and the light armed troops, the advanced guard and the rear, are marshalled by the skill of their military leaders; so the domestic officers, who bear a rod, as an ensign of authority, distribute and arrange the numerous train of slaves and attendants. The baggage and wardrobe move in the front; and are immediately followed by a multitude of cooks, and inferior ministers, employed in the service of the kitchens, and of the table. The main body is composed of a promiscuous crowd of slaves, increased by the accidental concourse of idle or dependent plebeians. The rear is closed by the favorite band of eunuchs, distributed from age to youth, according to the order of seniority. Their numbers and their deformity excite the horror of the indignant spectators, who are ready to execrate the memory of Semiramis, for the cruel art which she invented, of frustrating the purposes of nature, and of blasting in the bud the hopes of future generations. In the exercise of domestic jurisdiction, the nobles of Rome express an exquisite sensibility for any personal injury, and a contemptuous indifference for the rest of the human species. When they have called for warm water, if a slave has been tardy in his obedience, he is instantly chastised with three hundred lashes: but should the same slave commit a wilful murder, the master will mildly observe, that he is a worthless fellow; but that, if he repeats the offence, he shall not escape punishment. Hospitality was formerly the virtue of the Romans; and every stranger, who could plead either merit or misfortune, was relieved, or rewarded by their generosity. At present, if a foreigner, perhaps of no contemptible rank, is introduced to one of the proud and wealthy senators, he is welcomed indeed in the first audience, with such warm professions, and such kind inquiries, that he retires, enchanted with the affability of his illustrious friend, and full of regret that he had so long delayed his journey to Rome, the active seat of manners, as well as of empire. Secure of a favorable reception, he repeats his visit the ensuing day, and is mortified by the discovery, that his person, his name, and his country, are already forgotten. If he still has resolution to persevere, he is gradually numbered in the train of dependants, and obtains the permission to pay his assiduous and unprofitable court to a haughty patron, incapable of gratitude or friendship; who scarcely deigns to remark his presence, his departure, or his return. Whenever the rich prepare a solemn and popular entertainment; whenever they celebrate, with profuse and pernicious luxury, their private banquets; the choice of the guests is the subject of anxious deliberation. The modest, the sober, and the learned, are seldom preferred; and the nomenclators, who are commonly swayed by interested motives, have the address to insert, in the list of invitations, the obscure names of the most worthless of mankind. But the frequent and familiar companions of the great, are those parasites, who practise the most useful of all arts, the art of flattery; who eagerly applaud each word, and every action, of their immortal patron; gaze with rapture on his marble columns and variegated pavements; and strenuously praise the pomp and elegance which he is taught to consider as a part of his personal merit. At the Roman tables, the birds, the squirrels or the fish, which appear of an uncommon size, are contemplated with curious attention; a pair of scales is accurately applied, to ascertain their real weight; and, while the more rational guests are disgusted by the vain and tedious repetition, notaries are summoned to attest, by an authentic record, the truth of such a marvelous event. Another method of introduction into the houses and society of the great, is derived from the profession of gaming, or, as it is more politely styled, of play. The confederates are united by a strict and indissoluble bond of friendship, or rather of conspiracy; a superior degree of skill in the Tesserarian art (which may be interpreted the game of dice and tables) is a sure road to wealth and reputation. A master of that sublime science, who in a supper, or assembly, is placed below a magistrate, displays in his countenance the surprise and indignation which Cato might be supposed to feel, when he was refused the prætorship by the votes of a capricious people. The acquisition of knowledge seldom engages the curiosity of nobles, who abhor the fatigue, and disdain the advantages, of study; and the only books which they peruse are the Satires of Juvenal, and the verbose and fabulous histories of Marius Maximus. The libraries, which they have inherited from their fathers, are secluded, like dreary sepulchres, from the light of day. But the costly instruments of the theatre, flutes, and enormous lyres, and hydraulic organs, are constructed for their use; and the harmony of vocal and instrumental music is incessantly repeated in the palaces of Rome. In those palaces, sound is preferred to sense, and the care of the body to that of the mind. It is allowed as a salutary maxim, that the light and frivolous suspicion of a contagious malady, is of sufficient weight to excuse the visits of the most intimate friends; and even the servants, who are despatched to make the decent inquiries, are not suffered to return home, till they have undergone the ceremony of a previous ablution. Yet this selfish and unmanly delicacy occasionally yields to the more imperious passion of avarice. The prospect of gain will urge a rich and gouty senator as far as Spoleto; every sentiment of arrogance and dignity is subdued by the hopes of an inheritance, or even of a legacy; and a wealthy childless citizen is the most powerful of the Romans. The art of obtaining the signature of a favorable testament, and sometimes of hastening the moment of its execution, is perfectly understood; and it has happened, that in the same house, though in different apartments, a husband and a wife, with the laudable design of overreaching each other, have summoned their respective lawyers, to declare, at the same time, their mutual, but contradictory, intentions. The distress which follows and chastises extravagant luxury, often reduces the great to the use of the most humiliating expedients. When they desire to borrow, they employ the base and supplicating style of the slave in the comedy; but when they are called upon to pay, they assume the royal and tragic declamation of the grandsons of Hercules. If the demand is repeated, they readily procure some trusty sycophant, instructed to maintain a charge of poison, or magic, against the insolent creditor; who is seldom released from prison, till he has signed a discharge of the whole debt. These vices, which degrade the moral character of the Romans, are mixed with a puerile superstition, that disgraces their understanding. They listen with confidence to the predictions of haruspices, who pretend to read, in the entrails of victims, the signs of future greatness and prosperity; and there are many who do not presume either to bathe, or to dine, or to appear in public, till they have diligently consulted, according to the rules of astrology, the situation of Mercury, and the aspect of the moon. It is singular enough, that this vain credulity may often be discovered among the profane sceptics, who impiously doubt, or deny, the existence of a celestial power."
"The greatness of Rome"—that's what the historian says—"was built on the rare and almost unbelievable combination of virtue and fortune. During its long early years, Rome fought hard against the tribes of Italy, who were both neighbors and enemies of the emerging city. In its youthful vigor, Rome faced the chaos of war, expanded its victories across oceans and mountains, and brought home triumphs from every part of the world. Finally, as it grew older, sometimes conquering merely by the fear of its name, it sought the comforts of peace and stability. The venerable city, which had once crushed the fiercest nations and established a system of laws that ensured justice and freedom, was content, like a wise and wealthy parent, to leave the responsibility of governance to the Cæsars, her favored sons. A secure and deep peace, reminiscent of the reign of Numa, replaced the tumult of the republic while Rome continued to be revered as the queen of the earth, and subject nations still held the people and the senate in high esteem. However, this natural brilliance," continues Ammianus, "has been tarnished by the actions of some nobles, who, disregarding their own dignity and that of their country, indulge in unchecked vice and folly. They compete with one another in the empty pride of titles and surnames, selecting or inventing the most grandiose names, like Reburrus or Fabunius, Pagonius or Tarasius, to impress the common people. Driven by a vain desire to preserve their memory, they insist on multiplying their likeness in statues of bronze and marble, and they aren't satisfied unless those statues are covered in gold plates—a privilege first granted to Acilius the consul, after he defeated King Antiochus through his military and strategic prowess. Their showy display of wealth, perhaps to inflate the value of their vast estates across all provinces, stirs deserved resentment in anyone who remembers that their poor and invincible ancestors were not distinguished from the simplest soldiers by the luxury of their food or clothing. Modern nobles, however, measure their status by the grandeur of their chariots and the ostentation of their attire. Their long robes of silk and purple billow in the wind, revealing, either by design or chance, their luxurious undergarments embellished with various animal designs. Followed by a train of fifty servants, they storm down the streets with the same reckless speed as if they were riding post horses; and the senators' example is boldly imitated by the women, whose covered carriages are constantly circling the vast expanse of the city and its suburbs. When these distinguished individuals deign to visit the public baths, they enter with a loud and haughty tone, claiming the facilities meant for the Roman people for their own use. If, in these mixed public spaces, they encounter any of their notorious pleasure-seeking companions, they greet them warmly while ignoring their fellow citizens, who are only allowed the honor of kissing their hands or knees. After enjoying the refreshing baths, they don their rings and other symbols of their status, choose from their extensive wardrobes of the finest linens, enough for a dozen people, and maintain the same arrogant demeanor until they leave—an attitude that might have been excused in the great Marcellus after his conquest of Syracuse. Sometimes, these elites take on even more challenging pursuits; they visit their estates in Italy and indulge in hunting, thanks to the hard work of their servants. On a hot day, if they dare to sail in their colorful galleys from the Lucrine Lake to their elegant seaside villas at Puteoli and Cayeta, they compare their journeys to those of Cæsar and Alexander. Yet, should a fly land on the silk of their gilded umbrellas, or a sunbeam slip through an unnoticed crack, they groan about their unbearable hardships and lament, with feigned despair, that they were not born in the land of the Cimmerians, where darkness reigns eternal. On these trips to the countryside, the entire household follows their master. Just as cavalry and infantry, heavy and light troops, advance guards and rear guards are organized by skilled military leaders, so too do the domestic officers, carrying a rod as a sign of authority, arrange and distribute the many slaves and attendants. The cargo and wardrobe lead the procession, immediately followed by a throng of cooks and other servants busy in the kitchens and dining areas. The main body consists of a mixed crowd of slaves, along with those idle or dependent plebeians hanging around. The rear is led by a favored band of eunuchs, ranging in age, and divided by seniority. Their numbers and deformities elicit horror from onlookers, who are ready to curse the memory of Semiramis for the cruel practice of denying nature its course and thwarting future generations' hopes. In their private affairs, the nobles of Rome display an acute sensitivity to personal injuries while displaying contempt for the rest of humanity. If they summon warm water and a slave is slow to respond, he instantly receives three hundred lashes; but if the same slave commits murder, the master merely remarks that he is a worthless individual, though warns that if he does so again, punishment will follow. Hospitality used to be a virtue among Romans; every stranger, with a claim to either merit or misfortune, received help or rewards from their generosity. Nowadays, if a foreigner, perhaps of some significance, meets one of the proud wealthy senators, he is indeed warmly welcomed at first, with such enthusiastic professions and inquiries that he leaves feeling enchanted by his illustrious friend's kindness and regrets he delayed his journey to Rome, the hub of culture and power. Confident of a warm reception, he visits the next day only to discover he has already been forgotten. Persisting, he slowly becomes part of the group of dependents, allowed to pay his constant, but unappreciated, court to an arrogant patron who shows little gratitude or friendship, hardly noticing his comings and goings. Whenever the wealthy host grand public parties or celebrate lavishly and decadently in private banquets, they deliberate anxiously over their guest list. The modest, sober, and learned are rarely chosen; and the namekeepers, often driven by self-interest, skillfully include the obscure names of the most insignificant people. However, the frequent and familiar companions of the wealthy are those sycophants who practice the most valuable art—flattery—who eagerly applaud every word and action of their esteemed patron, gaze in awe at his marble columns and patterned floors, and fervently praise the splendor and elegance he believes reflect his personal worth. At dining tables in Rome, unusual birds, squirrels, or fish are examined with great curiosity; scales are used to accurately measure their weights, and while the sensible guests are repelled by the tedious and vain exercise, notaries are summoned to document the extraordinary event. Another way into the homes and circles of the elite comes from the world of gaming, or "play" as it’s more politely known. Allies form a tight and unbreakable bond of friendship, or conspiracy; a higher skill level in the game of dice and boards guarantees wealth and status. A master of this esteemed skill, if seated at dinner or in a gathering beneath a magistrate, shows the same surprise and indignation that Cato might have felt when denied the prætorship by a fickle populace. Knowledge rarely piques the interest of the elites, who disdain the hard work and benefits of learning; the only books they read are Juvenal's Satires and the long-winded, fanciful histories of Marius Maximus. The libraries they inherited from their fathers are dark and lifeless, like gloomy tombs. Instead, they enjoy the expensive gadgets of the theater—flutes, enormous lyres, and hydraulic organs—while vocal and instrumental music fills their opulent palaces. In those palaces, sound takes precedence over substance, and caring for the body is prioritized over the mind. A trivial fear of a contagious illness is enough to excuse friends from visiting, and even the servants sent to offer polite inquiries cannot return home without first bathing. Yet this self-serving and unmanly delicacy sometimes gives way to the overpowering urge for wealth. The prospect of profit can drive a rich and gout-ridden senator to Spoleto; all sense of pride and dignity is eclipsed by promises of inheritance or even legacy; and a wealthy childless citizen holds the most power among the Romans. The art of securing a friendly signature on a will, and sometimes hurrying its execution, is well understood; it has happened that in the same house, albeit in different rooms, a husband and a wife—keen to outsmart one another—have summoned their lawyers to simultaneously declare their conflicting intentions. The fallout from reckless excess can lead the wealthy to resort to the most degrading measures. When they need to borrow, they adopt the demeaning and begging language of comic slaves; yet when asked to pay, they adopt the grandiose and dramatic speech of Hercules's descendants. If the demand is persistent, they find a reliable informant to accuse the insolent creditor of poison or magic; someone who is seldom freed from jail until they sign off on the entire debt. These vices, which tarnish the moral fiber of Romans, intertwine with a childish superstition that belittles their intelligence. They trust in the predictions of haruspices, who claim to read the future in the entrails of sacrifices; many will not bathe, eat, or appear publicly without consulting the positioning of Mercury or the phase of the moon according to astrology. It’s ironic that this foolish credulity is often found even among the hardened skeptics who doubt or deny the existence of any divine power."
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part III.
In populous cities, which are the seat of commerce and manufactures, the middle ranks of inhabitants, who derive their subsistence from the dexterity or labor of their hands, are commonly the most prolific, the most useful, and, in that sense, the most respectable part of the community. But the plebeians of Rome, who disdained such sedentary and servile arts, had been oppressed from the earliest times by the weight of debt and usury; and the husbandman, during the term of his military service, was obliged to abandon the cultivation of his farm. The lands of Italy which had been originally divided among the families of free and indigent proprietors, were insensibly purchased or usurped by the avarice of the nobles; and in the age which preceded the fall of the republic, it was computed that only two thousand citizens were possessed of an independent substance. Yet as long as the people bestowed, by their suffrages, the honors of the state, the command of the legions, and the administration of wealthy provinces, their conscious pride alleviated in some measure, the hardships of poverty; and their wants were seasonably supplied by the ambitious liberality of the candidates, who aspired to secure a venal majority in the thirty-five tribes, or the hundred and ninety-three centuries, of Rome. But when the prodigal commons had not only imprudently alienated not only the use, but the inheritance of power, they sunk, under the reign of the Cæsars, into a vile and wretched populace, which must, in a few generations, have been totally extinguished, if it had not been continually recruited by the manumission of slaves, and the influx of strangers. As early as the time of Hadrian, it was the just complaint of the ingenuous natives, that the capital had attracted the vices of the universe, and the manners of the most opposite nations. The intemperance of the Gauls, the cunning and levity of the Greeks, the savage obstinacy of the Egyptians and Jews, the servile temper of the Asiatics, and the dissolute, effeminate prostitution of the Syrians, were mingled in the various multitude, which, under the proud and false denomination of Romans, presumed to despise their fellow-subjects, and even their sovereigns, who dwelt beyond the precincts of the Eternal City.
In crowded cities, which are centers of trade and manufacturing, the middle class, who earn their living through skill or hard work, tend to be the most numerous, the most beneficial, and in that way, the most respected part of society. However, the common people of Rome, who looked down on such manual and menial jobs, had been burdened since ancient times by heavy debt and usury; and farmers, while serving in the military, had to leave their fields untended. The lands of Italy, originally shared among families of free and poor landowners, were gradually bought up or taken over by the greed of the nobles. By the time just before the fall of the republic, it was estimated that only two thousand citizens owned land independently. Yet as long as the people elected officials to state honors, commanded the armies, and governed wealthy provinces, their pride made their struggles with poverty a bit easier, and their needs were met by the ambitious generosity of candidates trying to win the support of the thirty-five tribes or the one hundred and ninety-three centuries of Rome. But when the careless common people not only foolishly gave up the use of power but also its inheritance, they fell into a miserable and wretched state under the reign of the Cæsars, which would have likely led to their complete extinction in a few generations if they had not been continuously replenished by the freeing of slaves and the arrival of outsiders. As early as Hadrian’s time, the honest locals complained that the capital had drawn in the bad behaviors and customs of the entire world, mixing the excesses of the Gauls, the trickery and frivolity of the Greeks, the stubbornness of the Egyptians and Jews, the subservient nature of Asians, and the decadent, effeminate behavior of the Syrians into the diverse crowd, which, under the proud but misleading title of Romans, dared to disdain their fellow citizens and even their rulers living outside the borders of the Eternal City.
Yet the name of that city was still pronounced with respect: the frequent and capricious tumults of its inhabitants were indulged with impunity; and the successors of Constantine, instead of crushing the last remains of the democracy by the strong arm of military power, embraced the mild policy of Augustus, and studied to relieve the poverty, and to amuse the idleness, of an innumerable people. I. For the convenience of the lazy plebeians, the monthly distributions of corn were converted into a daily allowance of bread; a great number of ovens were constructed and maintained at the public expense; and at the appointed hour, each citizen, who was furnished with a ticket, ascended the flight of steps, which had been assigned to his peculiar quarter or division, and received, either as a gift, or at a very low price, a loaf of bread of the weight of three pounds, for the use of his family. II. The forest of Lucania, whose acorns fattened large droves of wild hogs, afforded, as a species of tribute, a plentiful supply of cheap and wholesome meat. During five months of the year, a regular allowance of bacon was distributed to the poorer citizens; and the annual consumption of the capital, at a time when it was much declined from its former lustre, was ascertained, by an edict from Valentinian the Third, at three millions six hundred and twenty-eight thousand pounds. III. In the manners of antiquity, the use of oil was indispensable for the lamp, as well as for the bath; and the annual tax, which was imposed on Africa for the benefit of Rome, amounted to the weight of three millions of pounds, to the measure, perhaps, of three hundred thousand English gallons. IV. The anxiety of Augustus to provide the metropolis with sufficient plenty of corn, was not extended beyond that necessary article of human subsistence; and when the popular clamor accused the dearness and scarcity of wine, a proclamation was issued, by the grave reformer, to remind his subjects that no man could reasonably complain of thirst, since the aqueducts of Agrippa had introduced into the city so many copious streams of pure and salubrious water. This rigid sobriety was insensibly relaxed; and, although the generous design of Aurelian does not appear to have been executed in its full extent, the use of wine was allowed on very easy and liberal terms. The administration of the public cellars was delegated to a magistrate of honorable rank; and a considerable part of the vintage of Campania was reserved for the fortunate inhabitants of Rome.
Yet the name of that city was still spoken with respect: the frequent and unpredictable disturbances caused by its citizens were tolerated without punishment; and the successors of Constantine, instead of suppressing the last bits of democracy with military force, adopted the gentle approach of Augustus, focusing on alleviating the poverty and entertaining the idle masses. I. To make things easier for the lazy commoners, the monthly corn distributions were changed to a daily bread allowance; many ovens were built and maintained at public expense; and at the scheduled time, each citizen with a ticket would go up the steps designated for their specific area and receive, either for free or at a very low cost, a loaf of bread weighing three pounds for their family. II. The Lucanian forest, where acorns fattened large groups of wild pigs, provided a generous supply of cheap and healthy meat as a form of tribute. For five months of the year, a regular supply of bacon was given to poorer citizens; the annual meat consumption in the capital, when it had significantly declined from its former glory, was reported by an edict from Valentinian the Third to be three million six hundred twenty-eight thousand pounds. III. In ancient times, oil was essential for both lamps and baths; the annual tax imposed on Africa for Rome’s benefit was three million pounds, equivalent to about three hundred thousand English gallons. IV. Augustus was keen to ensure that the city had enough corn but didn’t extend this effort to other necessities; when people complained about the high prices and scarcity of wine, he issued a proclamation to remind them that no one should reasonably complain of thirst since Agrippa's aqueducts had brought plenty of fresh, clean water to the city. This strict sobriety gradually relaxed; and although Aurelian’s ambitious plan doesn’t seem to have been fully implemented, wine was made available under very easy and generous conditions. The management of public cellars was assigned to an official of high status, and a significant portion of the wine from Campania was set aside for the fortunate residents of Rome.
The stupendous aqueducts, so justly celebrated by the praises of Augustus himself, replenished the Therm, or baths, which had been constructed in every part of the city, with Imperial magnificence. The baths of Antoninus Caracalla, which were open, at stated hours, for the indiscriminate service of the senators and the people, contained above sixteen hundred seats of marble; and more than three thousand were reckoned in the baths of Diocletian. The walls of the lofty apartments were covered with curious mosaics, that imitated the art of the pencil in the elegance of design, and the variety of colors. The Egyptian granite was beautifully encrusted with the precious green marble of Numidia; the perpetual stream of hot water was poured into the capacious basins, through so many wide mouths of bright and massy silver; and the meanest Roman could purchase, with a small copper coin, the daily enjoyment of a scene of pomp and luxury, which might excite the envy of the kings of Asia. From these stately palaces issued a swarm of dirty and ragged plebeians, without shoes and without a mantle; who loitered away whole days in the street of Forum, to hear news and to hold disputes; who dissipated in extravagant gaming, the miserable pittance of their wives and children; and spent the hours of the night in the obscure taverns, and brothels, in the indulgence of gross and vulgar sensuality.
The amazing aqueducts, rightly praised by Augustus himself, supplied the Therm, or baths, which were built throughout the city with grand Imperial style. The baths of Antoninus Caracalla, open at set times for both senators and common people, had more than sixteen hundred marble seats, while the baths of Diocletian boasted over three thousand. The walls of the spacious rooms were decorated with intricate mosaics that mimicked painting through elegant designs and a variety of colors. The beautiful Egyptian granite was adorned with precious green marble from Numidia; a constant flow of hot water poured into the large basins from multiple wide mouths made of bright, heavy silver. Even the poorest Roman could enjoy a lavish scene that could make kings from Asia envious for just a small copper coin. From these grand palaces came a crowd of dirty and ragged commoners, without shoes and cloaks, who wasted whole days in the Forum to catch up on news and argue; they squandered their meager earnings from their wives and children on excessive gambling and spent their nights in dimly lit taverns and brothels, indulging in crude and base desires.
But the most lively and splendid amusement of the idle multitude, depended on the frequent exhibition of public games and spectacles. The piety of Christian princes had suppressed the inhuman combats of gladiators; but the Roman people still considered the Circus as their home, their temple, and the seat of the republic. The impatient crowd rushed at the dawn of day to secure their places, and there were many who passed a sleepless and anxious night in the adjacent porticos. From the morning to the evening, careless of the sun, or of the rain, the spectators, who sometimes amounted to the number of four hundred thousand, remained in eager attention; their eyes fixed on the horses and charioteers, their minds agitated with hope and fear, for the success of the colors which they espoused: and the happiness of Rome appeared to hang on the event of a race. The same immoderate ardor inspired their clamors and their applause, as often as they were entertained with the hunting of wild beasts, and the various modes of theatrical representation. These representations in modern capitals may deserve to be considered as a pure and elegant school of taste, and perhaps of virtue. But the Tragic and Comic Muse of the Romans, who seldom aspired beyond the imitation of Attic genius, had been almost totally silent since the fall of the republic; and their place was unworthily occupied by licentious farce, effeminate music, and splendid pageantry. The pantomimes, who maintained their reputation from the age of Augustus to the sixth century, expressed, without the use of words, the various fables of the gods and heroes of antiquity; and the perfection of their art, which sometimes disarmed the gravity of the philosopher, always excited the applause and wonder of the people. The vast and magnificent theatres of Rome were filled by three thousand female dancers, and by three thousand singers, with the masters of the respective choruses. Such was the popular favor which they enjoyed, that, in a time of scarcity, when all strangers were banished from the city, the merit of contributing to the public pleasures exempted them from a law, which was strictly executed against the professors of the liberal arts.
But the most lively and extravagant entertainment for the idle masses relied on the regular display of public games and shows. The religious convictions of Christian rulers had put an end to the brutal fights of gladiators; however, the Roman people still viewed the Circus as their home, their sanctuary, and the center of the republic. The eager crowd rushed at dawn to claim their spots, and many spent a restless night anxiously waiting in the nearby porticos. From morning to evening, indifferent to the sun or rain, the audience, which sometimes numbered up to four hundred thousand, remained intensely focused; their eyes glued to the horses and charioteers, their minds racing with hope and fear for the success of the colors they supported, as the fate of Rome seemed to depend on the outcome of the race. The same excessive enthusiasm fueled their cheers and applause whenever they were entertained by wild animal hunts and various theatrical performances. These performances in today’s cities might be seen as a refined and artistic display, perhaps even virtuous. But the tragic and comic talents of the Romans, who rarely aimed beyond mimicking the genius of Athens, had been almost entirely silent since the republic’s fall; their place was poorly filled by vulgar farces, weak music, and elaborate shows. The pantomimes, who maintained their acclaim from the time of Augustus to the sixth century, conveyed, without spoken words, the various myths of the gods and heroes of old; their artistic perfection, which occasionally lightened the philosopher’s serious demeanor, consistently sparked the applause and amazement of the public. The grand and impressive theaters of Rome were filled with three thousand female dancers and three thousand singers, along with their respective chorus leaders. Their popularity was such that during a time of famine, when all outsiders were expelled from the city, their ability to contribute to public joy spared them from a law that was strictly enforced against practitioners of the liberal arts.
It is said, that the foolish curiosity of Elagabalus attempted to discover, from the quantity of spiders' webs, the number of the inhabitants of Rome. A more rational method of inquiry might not have been undeserving of the attention of the wisest princes, who could easily have resolved a question so important for the Roman government, and so interesting to succeeding ages. The births and deaths of the citizens were duly registered; and if any writer of antiquity had condescended to mention the annual amount, or the common average, we might now produce some satisfactory calculation, which would destroy the extravagant assertions of critics, and perhaps confirm the modest and probable conjectures of philosophers. The most diligent researches have collected only the following circumstances; which, slight and imperfect as they are, may tend, in some degree, to illustrate the question of the populousness of ancient Rome. I. When the capital of the empire was besieged by the Goths, the circuit of the walls was accurately measured, by Ammonius, the mathematician, who found it equal to twenty-one miles. It should not be forgotten that the form of the city was almost that of a circle; the geometrical figure which is known to contain the largest space within any given circumference. II. The architect Vitruvius, who flourished in the Augustan age, and whose evidence, on this occasion, has peculiar weight and authority, observes, that the innumerable habitations of the Roman people would have spread themselves far beyond the narrow limits of the city; and that the want of ground, which was probably contracted on every side by gardens and villas, suggested the common, though inconvenient, practice of raising the houses to a considerable height in the air. But the loftiness of these buildings, which often consisted of hasty work and insufficient materials, was the cause of frequent and fatal accidents; and it was repeatedly enacted by Augustus, as well as by Nero, that the height of private edifices within the walls of Rome, should not exceed the measure of seventy feet from the ground. III. Juvenal laments, as it should seem from his own experience, the hardships of the poorer citizens, to whom he addresses the salutary advice of emigrating, without delay, from the smoke of Rome, since they might purchase, in the little towns of Italy, a cheerful commodious dwelling, at the same price which they annually paid for a dark and miserable lodging. House-rent was therefore immoderately dear: the rich acquired, at an enormous expense, the ground, which they covered with palaces and gardens; but the body of the Roman people was crowded into a narrow space; and the different floors, and apartments, of the same house, were divided, as it is still the custom of Paris, and other cities, among several families of plebeians. IV. The total number of houses in the fourteen regions of the city, is accurately stated in the description of Rome, composed under the reign of Theodosius, and they amount to forty-eight thousand three hundred and eighty-two. The two classes of domus and of insul, into which they are divided, include all the habitations of the capital, of every rank and condition from the marble palace of the Anicii, with a numerous establishment of freedmen and slaves, to the lofty and narrow lodging-house, where the poet Codrus and his wife were permitted to hire a wretched garret immediately under the tiles. If we adopt the same average, which, under similar circumstances, has been found applicable to Paris, and indifferently allow about twenty-five persons for each house, of every degree, we may fairly estimate the inhabitants of Rome at twelve hundred thousand: a number which cannot be thought excessive for the capital of a mighty empire, though it exceeds the populousness of the greatest cities of modern Europe.
It is said that the foolish curiosity of Elagabalus tried to figure out the number of people living in Rome by counting the quantity of spider webs. A more sensible way to find out could have caught the attention of wiser rulers, who could have easily answered such an important question for the Roman government and one that would be interesting for future generations. The births and deaths of citizens were properly recorded; and if any ancient writer had decided to mention the yearly count or the average, we could now provide some solid calculations that would dismiss the outrageous claims of critics and possibly support the reasonable guesses of philosophers. The most thorough investigations have only gathered the following details; although they are limited and incomplete, they might help shed some light on the population of ancient Rome. I. When the capital of the empire was besieged by the Goths, the mathematician Ammonius accurately measured the walls and found them to be twenty-one miles around. It's important to note that the city's shape was nearly circular, which is the geometric form known to enclose the most space within a given perimeter. II. The architect Vitruvius, who lived during the Augustan age and whose opinion carries significant weight, noted that the countless homes of the Roman people would have extended far beyond the narrow confines of the city; and that the scarcity of land, likely restricted on all sides by gardens and villas, led to the common, though inconvenient, practice of constructing houses to considerable heights. However, the height of these buildings, which were often hastily built with insufficient materials, led to frequent and deadly accidents; it was repeatedly mandated by both Augustus and Nero that private buildings within the walls of Rome should not exceed seventy feet from the ground. III. Juvenal, lamenting from what seems to be personal experience, highlights the struggles of the poorer citizens and encourages them to leave the smoke of Rome as soon as possible, since they could buy a pleasant, comfortable home in the small towns of Italy for the same amount they paid annually for a dark and miserable place to live. Rent was therefore excessively high: the wealthy acquired land at great cost, covering it with palaces and gardens; meanwhile, the majority of the Roman population was crammed into a small area, and various floors and apartments of the same house were shared, as is still customary in Paris and other cities, among multiple families of lower-class citizens. IV. The total number of houses in the fourteen regions of the city is accurately listed in the description of Rome composed during the reign of Theodosius, amounting to forty-eight thousand three hundred and eighty-two. The two categories of domus and insul, which encompass all the types of residences in the capital, range from the marble palace of the Anicii, with many freedmen and slaves, to the tall, narrow boarding house where the poet Codrus and his wife were forced to rent a miserable attic right under the roof tiles. If we adopt the same average that has been appropriately applied to Paris, estimating roughly twenty-five people per house, we can reasonably estimate the population of Rome at one million two hundred thousand—a number that shouldn’t be seen as excessive for the capital of a powerful empire, even though it exceeds the populations of the largest cities in modern Europe.
Such was the state of Rome under the reign of Honorius; at the time when the Gothic army formed the siege, or rather the blockade, of the city. By a skilful disposition of his numerous forces, who impatiently watched the moment of an assault, Alaric encompassed the walls, commanded the twelve principal gates, intercepted all communication with the adjacent country, and vigilantly guarded the navigation of the Tyber, from which the Romans derived the surest and most plentiful supply of provisions. The first emotions of the nobles, and of the people, were those of surprise and indignation, that a vile Barbarian should dare to insult the capital of the world: but their arrogance was soon humbled by misfortune; and their unmanly rage, instead of being directed against an enemy in arms, was meanly exercised on a defenceless and innocent victim. Perhaps in the person of Serena, the Romans might have respected the niece of Theodosius, the aunt, nay, even the adoptive mother, of the reigning emperor: but they abhorred the widow of Stilicho; and they listened with credulous passion to the tale of calumny, which accused her of maintaining a secret and criminal correspondence with the Gothic invader. Actuated, or overawed, by the same popular frenzy, the senate, without requiring any evidence of his guilt, pronounced the sentence of her death. Serena was ignominiously strangled; and the infatuated multitude were astonished to find, that this cruel act of injustice did not immediately produce the retreat of the Barbarians, and the deliverance of the city. That unfortunate city gradually experienced the distress of scarcity, and at length the horrid calamities of famine. The daily allowance of three pounds of bread was reduced to one half, to one third, to nothing; and the price of corn still continued to rise in a rapid and extravagant proportion. The poorer citizens, who were unable to purchase the necessaries of life, solicited the precarious charity of the rich; and for a while the public misery was alleviated by the humanity of Læta, the widow of the emperor Gratian, who had fixed her residence at Rome, and consecrated to the use of the indigent the princely revenue which she annually received from the grateful successors of her husband. But these private and temporary donatives were insufficient to appease the hunger of a numerous people; and the progress of famine invaded the marble palaces of the senators themselves. The persons of both sexes, who had been educated in the enjoyment of ease and luxury, discovered how little is requisite to supply the demands of nature; and lavished their unavailing treasures of gold and silver, to obtain the coarse and scanty sustenance which they would formerly have rejected with disdain. The food the most repugnant to sense or imagination, the aliments the most unwholesome and pernicious to the constitution, were eagerly devoured, and fiercely disputed, by the rage of hunger. A dark suspicion was entertained, that some desperate wretches fed on the bodies of their fellow-creatures, whom they had secretly murdered; and even mothers, (such was the horrid conflict of the two most powerful instincts implanted by nature in the human breast,) even mothers are said to have tasted the flesh of their slaughtered infants! Many thousands of the inhabitants of Rome expired in their houses, or in the streets, for want of sustenance; and as the public sepulchres without the walls were in the power of the enemy the stench, which arose from so many putrid and unburied carcasses, infected the air; and the miseries of famine were succeeded and aggravated by the contagion of a pestilential disease. The assurances of speedy and effectual relief, which were repeatedly transmitted from the court of Ravenna, supported for some time, the fainting resolution of the Romans, till at length the despair of any human aid tempted them to accept the offers of a præternatural deliverance. Pompeianus, præfect of the city, had been persuaded, by the art or fanaticism of some Tuscan diviners, that, by the mysterious force of spells and sacrifices, they could extract the lightning from the clouds, and point those celestial fires against the camp of the Barbarians. The important secret was communicated to Innocent, the bishop of Rome; and the successor of St. Peter is accused, perhaps without foundation, of preferring the safety of the republic to the rigid severity of the Christian worship. But when the question was agitated in the senate; when it was proposed, as an essential condition, that those sacrifices should be performed in the Capitol, by the authority, and in the presence, of the magistrates, the majority of that respectable assembly, apprehensive either of the Divine or of the Imperial displeasure, refused to join in an act, which appeared almost equivalent to the public restoration of Paganism.
Such was the condition of Rome during the reign of Honorius, at a time when the Gothic army was laying siege, or rather, blockading the city. Alaric skillfully organized his large forces, who eagerly awaited the moment to launch an attack, surrounding the walls, controlling the twelve main gates, cutting off all communication with the surrounding area, and closely monitoring the navigation of the Tiber, from which the Romans obtained their most reliable and abundant food supply. The first reactions of the nobles and the people were surprise and outrage that a lowly barbarian should dare to insult the capital of the world; however, their arrogance was soon humbled by misfortune, and their unfounded rage, instead of targeting an armed enemy, was cruelly directed at a defenseless and innocent victim. Perhaps the Romans might have respected Serena, the niece of Theodosius, who was the aunt and even the adoptive mother of the reigning emperor, but they detested the widow of Stilicho, and they listened with blind passion to rumors accusing her of having a secret, illicit relationship with the Gothic invader. Driven or intimidated by the same public frenzy, the senate, without requiring any proof of her guilt, sentenced her to death. Serena was shamefully strangled, and the deluded crowd was shocked to find that this cruel injustice did not lead to the immediate retreat of the Barbarians or the salvation of the city. The unfortunate city gradually faced the hardships of scarcity and eventually the horrific disasters of famine. The daily allowance of bread, originally three pounds, was reduced to one half, then one third, then nothing; and the price of grain kept rising at an alarming and excessive rate. The poorer citizens, who couldn’t afford basic necessities, begged for precarious charity from the wealthy, and for a time, the public suffering was eased by the kindness of Læta, the widow of Emperor Gratian, who lived in Rome and generously dedicated her royal income to help the needy. But these temporary handouts weren’t enough to satisfy the hunger of such a large population, and as famine intensified, it reached even the marble palaces of the senators. Those who had been raised in comfort and luxury realized how little it takes to meet basic needs and began to spend their useless wealth on coarse and meager food they would have previously scorned. Food that was most unappetizing and harmful to health was eagerly consumed and fiercely contested due to the desperate hunger. There were dark suspicions that some desperate individuals resorted to feeding on the bodies of fellow humans whom they had secretly killed; and even mothers, torn by the terrible conflict of the two strongest instincts instilled by nature, were said to have tasted the flesh of their slaughtered infants! Many thousands of Romans died in their homes or on the streets from starvation; and since the public graves outside the walls were under enemy control, the stench from so many rotting, unburied corpses contaminated the air. The miseries of famine were worsened by an outbreak of pestilence. The repeated assurances of quick and effective help from the court of Ravenna initially kept the Romans’ spirits up, until despair over the lack of any human assistance led them to consider offers of a supernatural rescue. Pompeianus, the city prefect, had been convinced by some Tuscans, whether through skill or fanaticism, that, using mystical spells and sacrifices, they could summon lightning from the clouds and direct it against the Barbarian camp. This crucial secret was shared with Innocent, the bishop of Rome; and the successor of St. Peter is accused, perhaps unjustly, of prioritizing the safety of the republic over strict adherence to Christian practices. But when the matter was discussed in the senate, when it was proposed that these sacrifices be performed at the Capitol by the authority and in the presence of the magistrates, the majority of this esteemed assembly, fearing divine or imperial punishment, refused to take part in an act that seemed nearly equivalent to a public return to paganism.
The last resource of the Romans was in the clemency, or at least in the moderation, of the king of the Goths. The senate, who in this emergency assumed the supreme powers of government, appointed two ambassadors to negotiate with the enemy. This important trust was delegated to Basilius, a senator, of Spanish extraction, and already conspicuous in the administration of provinces; and to John, the first tribune of the notaries, who was peculiarly qualified, by his dexterity in business, as well as by his former intimacy with the Gothic prince. When they were introduced into his presence, they declared, perhaps in a more lofty style than became their abject condition, that the Romans were resolved to maintain their dignity, either in peace or war; and that, if Alaric refused them a fair and honorable capitulation, he might sound his trumpets, and prepare to give battle to an innumerable people, exercised in arms, and animated by despair. "The thicker the hay, the easier it is mowed," was the concise reply of the Barbarian; and this rustic metaphor was accompanied by a loud and insulting laugh, expressive of his contempt for the menaces of an unwarlike populace, enervated by luxury before they were emaciated by famine. He then condescended to fix the ransom, which he would accept as the price of his retreat from the walls of Rome: all the gold and silver in the city, whether it were the property of the state, or of individuals; all the rich and precious movables; and all the slaves that could prove their title to the name of Barbarians. The ministers of the senate presumed to ask, in a modest and suppliant tone, "If such, O king, are your demands, what do you intend to leave us?" "Your Lives!" replied the haughty conqueror: they trembled, and retired. Yet, before they retired, a short suspension of arms was granted, which allowed some time for a more temperate negotiation. The stern features of Alaric were insensibly relaxed; he abated much of the rigor of his terms; and at length consented to raise the siege, on the immediate payment of five thousand pounds of gold, of thirty thousand pounds of silver, of four thousand robes of silk, of three thousand pieces of fine scarlet cloth, and of three thousand pounds weight of pepper. But the public treasury was exhausted; the annual rents of the great estates in Italy and the provinces, had been exchanged, during the famine, for the vilest sustenance; the hoards of secret wealth were still concealed by the obstinacy of avarice; and some remains of consecrated spoils afforded the only resource that could avert the impending ruin of the city. As soon as the Romans had satisfied the rapacious demands of Alaric, they were restored, in some measure, to the enjoyment of peace and plenty. Several of the gates were cautiously opened; the importation of provisions from the river and the adjacent country was no longer obstructed by the Goths; the citizens resorted in crowds to the free market, which was held during three days in the suburbs; and while the merchants who undertook this gainful trade made a considerable profit, the future subsistence of the city was secured by the ample magazines which were deposited in the public and private granaries. A more regular discipline than could have been expected, was maintained in the camp of Alaric; and the wise Barbarian justified his regard for the faith of treaties, by the just severity with which he chastised a party of licentious Goths, who had insulted some Roman citizens on the road to Ostia. His army, enriched by the contributions of the capital, slowly advanced into the fair and fruitful province of Tuscany, where he proposed to establish his winter quarters; and the Gothic standard became the refuge of forty thousand Barbarian slaves, who had broke their chains, and aspired, under the command of their great deliverer, to revenge the injuries and the disgrace of their cruel servitude. About the same time, he received a more honorable reenforcement of Goths and Huns, whom Adolphus, the brother of his wife, had conducted, at his pressing invitation, from the banks of the Danube to those of the Tyber, and who had cut their way, with some difficulty and loss, through the superior number of the Imperial troops. A victorious leader, who united the daring spirit of a Barbarian with the art and discipline of a Roman general, was at the head of a hundred thousand fighting men; and Italy pronounced, with terror and respect, the formidable name of Alaric.
The last hope for the Romans rested on the mercy, or at least the moderation, of the king of the Goths. The senate, which took on full government powers in this crisis, appointed two ambassadors to negotiate with the enemy. This important task was given to Basilius, a senator of Spanish descent, already well-known for his administration of provinces, and to John, the chief tribune of the notaries, who was especially qualified due to his business skills and his past relationship with the Gothic prince. When they were brought before him, they declared, perhaps more grandly than suited their desperate situation, that the Romans were determined to uphold their dignity, whether in peace or war; and that if Alaric denied them a fair and honorable deal, he could sound his trumpets and prepare to fight against a countless army, trained in combat, and driven by desperation. "The thicker the hay, the easier it is mowed," was the succinct reply from the Barbarian; and this rustic joke came with a loud, mocking laugh, showing his contempt for the threats of a weak populace, softened by luxury before they were weakened by hunger. He then agreed to set a ransom, which he would accept as the price to withdraw from the walls of Rome: all the gold and silver in the city, whether it belonged to the state or individuals; all the rich and precious items; and all the slaves who could prove they were truly Barbarians. The senators, in a modest and pleading tone, asked, "If these are your demands, O king, what will you leave us?" "Your lives!" replied the proud conqueror, leaving them trembling as they withdrew. However, before they left, a temporary truce was granted, allowing some time for a more reasonable negotiation. Alaric’s stern demeanor softened somewhat; he eased many of his demands; and ultimately agreed to lift the siege in exchange for an immediate payment of five thousand pounds of gold, thirty thousand pounds of silver, four thousand silk robes, three thousand pieces of fine scarlet cloth, and three thousand pounds of pepper. But the public treasury was empty; the yearly rents from the large estates in Italy and the provinces had been traded away, during the famine, for the most basic food; the hidden wealth remained concealed by greed; and some remnants of sacred spoils were the only resources that could prevent the imminent downfall of the city. Once the Romans met Alaric's greedy demands, they were able, to some extent, to enjoy peace and plenty again. Several gates were cautiously opened; the flow of supplies from the river and nearby countryside was no longer blocked by the Goths; citizens flocked to the free market, which was held for three days in the suburbs; and while the merchants engaged in this profitable trade made considerable profits, the future sustenance of the city was secured by the ample stores held in both public and private granaries. Surprisingly disciplined order was maintained in Alaric's camp; and the wise Barbarian earned respect for honoring treaties by severely punishing a group of unruly Goths who had attacked some Roman citizens on the road to Ostia. His army, bolstered by resources from the capital, slowly moved into the beautiful and fertile province of Tuscany, where he planned to set up winter quarters; and the Gothic banner became a haven for forty thousand Barbarian slaves who had broken free from their chains and sought, under their great liberator's command, to avenge the injuries and shame of their harsh servitude. Around the same time, he received a more honorable reinforcements of Goths and Huns, whom Adolphus, his wife's brother, had brought, at his urgent request, from the banks of the Danube to those of the Tiber, having fought their way through superior Imperial forces with some difficulty and loss. A victorious leader who combined the boldness of a Barbarian with the skill and discipline of a Roman general led an army of a hundred thousand fighters; and Italy spoke, with fear and respect, the formidable name of Alaric.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part IV.
At the distance of fourteen centuries, we may be satisfied with relating the military exploits of the conquerors of Rome, without presuming to investigate the motives of their political conduct. In the midst of his apparent prosperity, Alaric was conscious, perhaps, of some secret weakness, some internal defect; or perhaps the moderation which he displayed, was intended only to deceive and disarm the easy credulity of the ministers of Honorius. The king of the Goths repeatedly declared, that it was his desire to be considered as the friend of peace, and of the Romans. Three senators, at his earnest request, were sent ambassadors to the court of Ravenna, to solicit the exchange of hostages, and the conclusion of the treaty; and the proposals, which he more clearly expressed during the course of the negotiations, could only inspire a doubt of his sincerity, as they might seem inadequate to the state of his fortune. The Barbarian still aspired to the rank of master-general of the armies of the West; he stipulated an annual subsidy of corn and money; and he chose the provinces of Dalmatia, Noricum, and Venetia, for the seat of his new kingdom, which would have commanded the important communication between Italy and the Danube. If these modest terms should be rejected, Alaric showed a disposition to relinquish his pecuniary demands, and even to content himself with the possession of Noricum; an exhausted and impoverished country, perpetually exposed to the inroads of the Barbarians of Germany. But the hopes of peace were disappointed by the weak obstinacy, or interested views, of the minister Olympius. Without listening to the salutary remonstrances of the senate, he dismissed their ambassadors under the conduct of a military escort, too numerous for a retinue of honor, and too feeble for any army of defence. Six thousand Dalmatians, the flower of the Imperial legions, were ordered to march from Ravenna to Rome, through an open country which was occupied by the formidable myriads of the Barbarians. These brave legionaries, encompassed and betrayed, fell a sacrifice to ministerial folly; their general, Valens, with a hundred soldiers, escaped from the field of battle; and one of the ambassadors, who could no longer claim the protection of the law of nations, was obliged to purchase his freedom with a ransom of thirty thousand pieces of gold. Yet Alaric, instead of resenting this act of impotent hostility, immediately renewed his proposals of peace; and the second embassy of the Roman senate, which derived weight and dignity from the presence of Innocent, bishop of the city, was guarded from the dangers of the road by a detachment of Gothic soldiers.
At a distance of fourteen centuries, we can comfortably recount the military actions of the conquerors of Rome without trying to understand the reasons behind their political behavior. In the midst of his seeming success, Alaric might have been aware of some hidden weakness or internal flaw; or perhaps the restraint he showed was just a tactic to fool and disarm the gullible advisors of Honorius. The king of the Goths repeatedly stated that he wanted to be seen as a friend of peace and the Romans. At his insistence, three senators were sent as ambassadors to the court of Ravenna to negotiate the exchange of hostages and finalize a treaty. However, the offers he clearly outlined during the negotiations could only raise doubts about his honesty, as they seemed insufficient given his circumstances. The Barbarian still aimed for the title of master-general of the armies of the West; he requested a yearly supply of grain and money; and he selected the provinces of Dalmatia, Noricum, and Venetia for the capital of his new kingdom, which would control the crucial route between Italy and the Danube. If these modest terms were refused, Alaric indicated a willingness to drop his financial demands and even settle for ruling Noricum, a drained and impoverished land, constantly vulnerable to the incursions of the Germanic Barbarians. However, hopes for peace were dashed by the weak stubbornness or self-serving motives of the minister Olympius. Ignoring the wise advice of the senate, he sent their ambassadors away under a military escort that was too large for a mere honor guard and too weak to form any real defense. Six thousand Dalmatian soldiers, the finest of the Imperial legions, were ordered to march from Ravenna to Rome through territory that was already occupied by overwhelming Barbarian forces. These brave soldiers, surrounded and betrayed, fell victim to government incompetence; their commander, Valens, with a hundred men, was the only one to escape from the battlefield, while one of the ambassadors, now without the protection of international law, had to pay a ransom of thirty thousand gold pieces for his freedom. Yet Alaric, rather than retaliating against this futile aggression, promptly renewed his peace proposals, and the second delegation from the Roman senate, which gained respect and authority from the presence of Innocent, the city's bishop, was protected on the journey by a group of Gothic soldiers.
Olympius might have continued to insult the just resentment of a people who loudly accused him as the author of the public calamities; but his power was undermined by the secret intrigues of the palace. The favorite eunuchs transferred the government of Honorius, and the empire, to Jovius, the Prætorian præfect; an unworthy servant, who did not atone, by the merit of personal attachment, for the errors and misfortunes of his administration. The exile, or escape, of the guilty Olympius, reserved him for more vicissitudes of fortune: he experienced the adventures of an obscure and wandering life; he again rose to power; he fell a second time into disgrace; his ears were cut off; he expired under the lash; and his ignominious death afforded a grateful spectacle to the friends of Stilicho. After the removal of Olympius, whose character was deeply tainted with religious fanaticism, the Pagans and heretics were delivered from the impolitic proscription, which excluded them from the dignities of the state. The brave Gennerid, a soldier of Barbarian origin, who still adhered to the worship of his ancestors, had been obliged to lay aside the military belt: and though he was repeatedly assured by the emperor himself, that laws were not made for persons of his rank or merit, he refused to accept any partial dispensation, and persevered in honorable disgrace, till he had extorted a general act of justice from the distress of the Roman government. The conduct of Gennerid in the important station to which he was promoted or restored, of master-general of Dalmatia, Pannonia, Noricum, and Rhætia, seemed to revive the discipline and spirit of the republic. From a life of idleness and want, his troops were soon habituated to severe exercise and plentiful subsistence; and his private generosity often supplied the rewards, which were denied by the avarice, or poverty, of the court of Ravenna. The valor of Gennerid, formidable to the adjacent Barbarians, was the firmest bulwark of the Illyrian frontier; and his vigilant care assisted the empire with a reenforcement of ten thousand Huns, who arrived on the confines of Italy, attended by such a convoy of provisions, and such a numerous train of sheep and oxen, as might have been sufficient, not only for the march of an army, but for the settlement of a colony. But the court and councils of Honorius still remained a scene of weakness and distraction, of corruption and anarchy. Instigated by the præfect Jovius, the guards rose in furious mutiny, and demanded the heads of two generals, and of the two principal eunuchs. The generals, under a perfidious promise of safety, were sent on shipboard, and privately executed; while the favor of the eunuchs procured them a mild and secure exile at Milan and Constantinople. Eusebius the eunuch, and the Barbarian Allobich, succeeded to the command of the bed-chamber and of the guards; and the mutual jealousy of these subordinate ministers was the cause of their mutual destruction. By the insolent order of the count of the domestics, the great chamberlain was shamefully beaten to death with sticks, before the eyes of the astonished emperor; and the subsequent assassination of Allobich, in the midst of a public procession, is the only circumstance of his life, in which Honorius discovered the faintest symptom of courage or resentment. Yet before they fell, Eusebius and Allobich had contributed their part to the ruin of the empire, by opposing the conclusion of a treaty which Jovius, from a selfish, and perhaps a criminal, motive, had negotiated with Alaric, in a personal interview under the walls of Rimini. During the absence of Jovius, the emperor was persuaded to assume a lofty tone of inflexible dignity, such as neither his situation, nor his character, could enable him to support; and a letter, signed with the name of Honorius, was immediately despatched to the Prætorian præfect, granting him a free permission to dispose of the public money, but sternly refusing to prostitute the military honors of Rome to the proud demands of a Barbarian. This letter was imprudently communicated to Alaric himself; and the Goth, who in the whole transaction had behaved with temper and decency, expressed, in the most outrageous language, his lively sense of the insult so wantonly offered to his person and to his nation. The conference of Rimini was hastily interrupted; and the præfect Jovius, on his return to Ravenna, was compelled to adopt, and even to encourage, the fashionable opinions of the court. By his advice and example, the principal officers of the state and army were obliged to swear, that, without listening, in any circumstances, to any conditions of peace, they would still persevere in perpetual and implacable war against the enemy of the republic. This rash engagement opposed an insuperable bar to all future negotiation. The ministers of Honorius were heard to declare, that, if they had only invoked the name of the Deity, they would consult the public safety, and trust their souls to the mercy of Heaven: but they had sworn by the sacred head of the emperor himself; they had sworn by the sacred head of the emperor himself; they had touched, in solemn ceremony, that august seat of majesty and wisdom; and the violation of their oath would expose them to the temporal penalties of sacrilege and rebellion.
Olympius could have continued to provoke the justified anger of a people who openly blamed him for the public disasters; however, his power was weakened by the hidden schemes within the palace. The favored eunuchs transferred control of Honorius and the empire to Jovius, the Praetorian prefect; an unworthy servant who did not redeem himself with personal loyalty for the mistakes and misfortunes of his leadership. The exile, or escape, of the guilty Olympius left him to face more twists of fate: he lived an obscure and wandering life filled with adventures; he rose to power again; he fell from grace a second time; his ears were cut off; he died under torture; and his disgraceful death provided a satisfying spectacle for Stilicho's supporters. After Olympius was removed, his character tainted by religious fanaticism, the Pagans and heretics were freed from the unwise ban that kept them from holding state offices. The brave Gennerid, a soldier of Barbarian descent who still adhered to the worship of his ancestors, had been forced to take off his military belt. Despite being repeatedly assured by the emperor that laws weren’t made for people of his rank or merit, he refused to accept any favoritism and held on to his honorable disgrace until he managed to extract a general act of justice from the struggling Roman government. Gennerid’s leadership in the significant role he was given as master-general of Dalmatia, Pannonia, Noricum, and Rhætia seemed to reinvigorate the discipline and spirit of the republic. From a life of idleness and need, his troops quickly got used to rigorous training and ample provisions; his personal generosity often provided rewards that were denied by the greed or poverty of the court in Ravenna. Gennerid’s bravery was a formidable defense against the neighboring Barbarians and he became the strongest bulwark of the Illyrian frontier; his vigilant efforts also helped the empire by bringing in a reinforcement of ten thousand Huns who arrived at the borders of Italy, accompanied by such a supply of provisions and such a herd of sheep and cattle that it could have sustained not only an army on the move but also the establishment of a colony. But the court and councils of Honorius remained a chaotic scene filled with weakness, distraction, corruption, and anarchy. Encouraged by the prefect Jovius, the guards erupted in a furious mutiny, demanding the heads of two generals and two leading eunuchs. The generals, under a deceptive promise of safety, were sent on board a ship and secretly executed, while the eunuchs enjoyed a gentle and safe exile in Milan and Constantinople. Eusebius the eunuch and the Barbarian Allobich took command of the bedchamber and guards; the mutual jealousy between these subordinate ministers led to their downfall. By the disrespectful order of the count of the domestics, the great chamberlain was brutally beaten to death with sticks before the astonished emperor; and the subsequent assassination of Allobich during a public ceremony was the only instance in his life where Honorius showed any hint of courage or resentment. Yet before their downfall, Eusebius and Allobich played their part in the empire’s ruin by blocking the finalization of a treaty that Jovius, motivated by self-interest and possibly criminal intent, had negotiated with Alaric during a personal meeting near the walls of Rimini. While Jovius was absent, the emperor was convinced to take on a tone of unwavering dignity that neither his position nor character could support; a letter signed by Honorius was quickly sent to the Praetorian prefect giving him permission to handle public funds but sternly refusing to compromise the military honors of Rome to satisfy a Barbarian’s proud demands. This letter was foolishly shared with Alaric himself; the Goth, who had behaved with patience and decorum throughout the negotiation, expressed, in the most inflammatory terms, his strong feelings about the insult inflicted on him and his people. The meeting at Rimini was abruptly cut short; and upon his return to Ravenna, the prefect Jovius was forced to adopt, and even to promote, the popular views of the court. Following his advice and example, top officials of the state and army had to swear that, regardless of circumstances, they would continue a relentless and unyielding war against the enemy of the republic without considering any terms of peace. This reckless oath created an insurmountable barrier to all future negotiations. The ministers of Honorius were heard declaring that if only they had called upon the name of the Deity, they could safeguard the public well-being and place their souls in the hands of Heaven: but they had sworn by the sacred head of the emperor himself; they had touched, in a solemn ceremony, that revered seat of majesty and wisdom; and breaking their oath would expose them to the earthly consequences of sacrilege and rebellion.
While the emperor and his court enjoyed, with sullen pride, the security of the marshes and fortifications of Ravenna, they abandoned Rome, almost without defence, to the resentment of Alaric. Yet such was the moderation which he still preserved, or affected, that, as he moved with his army along the Flaminian way, he successively despatched the bishops of the towns of Italy to reiterate his offers of peace, and to conjure the emperor, that he would save the city and its inhabitants from hostile fire, and the sword of the Barbarians. These impending calamities were, however, averted, not indeed by the wisdom of Honorius, but by the prudence or humanity of the Gothic king; who employed a milder, though not less effectual, method of conquest. Instead of assaulting the capital, he successfully directed his efforts against the Port of Ostia, one of the boldest and most stupendous works of Roman magnificence. The accidents to which the precarious subsistence of the city was continually exposed in a winter navigation, and an open road, had suggested to the genius of the first Cæsar the useful design, which was executed under the reign of Claudius. The artificial moles, which formed the narrow entrance, advanced far into the sea, and firmly repelled the fury of the waves, while the largest vessels securely rode at anchor within three deep and capacious basins, which received the northern branch of the Tyber, about two miles from the ancient colony of Ostia. The Roman Port insensibly swelled to the size of an episcopal city, where the corn of Africa was deposited in spacious granaries for the use of the capital. As soon as Alaric was in possession of that important place, he summoned the city to surrender at discretion; and his demands were enforced by the positive declaration, that a refusal, or even a delay, should be instantly followed by the destruction of the magazines, on which the life of the Roman people depended. The clamors of that people, and the terror of famine, subdued the pride of the senate; they listened, without reluctance, to the proposal of placing a new emperor on the throne of the unworthy Honorius; and the suffrage of the Gothic conqueror bestowed the purple on Attalus, præfect of the city. The grateful monarch immediately acknowledged his protector as master-general of the armies of the West; Adolphus, with the rank of count of the domestics, obtained the custody of the person of Attalus; and the two hostile nations seemed to be united in the closest bands of friendship and alliance.
While the emperor and his court took pride in the security provided by the marshes and fortifications of Ravenna, they left Rome almost defenseless against Alaric's anger. However, Alaric maintained a surprising level of restraint, or at least pretended to, as he moved his army along the Flaminian Way. He sent bishops from various towns in Italy to repeat his offers of peace and urged the emperor to protect the city and its people from destruction by fire and the barbarian sword. But the looming disasters were avoided, not due to Honorius's wisdom, but thanks to the prudence or kindness of the Gothic king, who used a gentler yet effective method of conquest. Instead of attacking the capital, he focused his efforts on the Port of Ostia, one of the most impressive achievements of Roman engineering. The risks associated with the city's reliance on winter shipping and an open road inspired the first Caesar to conceive a useful design, which was carried out during Claudius's reign. The artificial moles that formed the narrow entrance extended far into the sea, effectively blocking the waves, while large vessels anchored safely in three deep and spacious basins that welcomed the northern branch of the Tiber, about two miles from the ancient colony of Ostia. The Roman Port gradually grew into an episcopal city, where grain from Africa was stored in large granaries for the capital's use. Once Alaric captured this important location, he demanded the city surrender without conditions; he made it clear that failure to comply or even delaying would lead to the destruction of the storage facilities that sustained the Roman population. The outcry of the people and the fear of starvation softened the senate's pride; they agreed to the idea of placing a new emperor on the throne of the unworthy Honorius, and the Gothic conqueror endorsed Attalus, the city's prefect, for the role. The grateful monarch quickly recognized his protector as the commander of the Western armies; Adolphus, appointed count of the domestics, took charge of Attalus's safety, and the two opposing nations appeared to be united in strong friendship and alliance.
The gates of the city were thrown open, and the new emperor of the Romans, encompassed on every side by the Gothic arms, was conducted, in tumultuous procession, to the palace of Augustus and Trajan. After he had distributed the civil and military dignities among his favorites and followers, Attalus convened an assembly of the senate; before whom, in a formal and florid speech, he asserted his resolution of restoring the majesty of the republic, and of uniting to the empire the provinces of Egypt and the East, which had once acknowledged the sovereignty of Rome. Such extravagant promises inspired every reasonable citizen with a just contempt for the character of an unwarlike usurper, whose elevation was the deepest and most ignominious wound which the republic had yet sustained from the insolence of the Barbarians. But the populace, with their usual levity, applauded the change of masters. The public discontent was favorable to the rival of Honorius; and the sectaries, oppressed by his persecuting edicts, expected some degree of countenance, or at least of toleration, from a prince, who, in his native country of Ionia, had been educated in the Pagan superstition, and who had since received the sacrament of baptism from the hands of an Arian bishop. The first days of the reign of Attalus were fair and prosperous. An officer of confidence was sent with an inconsiderable body of troops to secure the obedience of Africa; the greatest part of Italy submitted to the terror of the Gothic powers; and though the city of Bologna made a vigorous and effectual resistance, the people of Milan, dissatisfied perhaps with the absence of Honorius, accepted, with loud acclamations, the choice of the Roman senate. At the head of a formidable army, Alaric conducted his royal captive almost to the gates of Ravenna; and a solemn embassy of the principal ministers, of Jovius, the Prætorian præfect, of Valens, master of the cavalry and infantry, of the quæstor Potamius, and of Julian, the first of the notaries, was introduced, with martial pomp, into the Gothic camp. In the name of their sovereign, they consented to acknowledge the lawful election of his competitor, and to divide the provinces of Italy and the West between the two emperors. Their proposals were rejected with disdain; and the refusal was aggravated by the insulting clemency of Attalus, who condescended to promise, that, if Honorius would instantly resign the purple, he should be permitted to pass the remainder of his life in the peaceful exile of some remote island. So desperate indeed did the situation of the son of Theodosius appear, to those who were the best acquainted with his strength and resources, that Jovius and Valens, his minister and his general, betrayed their trust, infamously deserted the sinking cause of their benefactor, and devoted their treacherous allegiance to the service of his more fortunate rival. Astonished by such examples of domestic treason, Honorius trembled at the approach of every servant, at the arrival of every messenger. He dreaded the secret enemies, who might lurk in his capital, his palace, his bed-chamber; and some ships lay ready in the harbor of Ravenna, to transport the abdicated monarch to the dominions of his infant nephew, the emperor of the East.
The city gates swung open, and the new emperor of the Romans, surrounded on all sides by Gothic forces, was led in a chaotic procession to the palace of Augustus and Trajan. After distributing civil and military ranks among his favorites and supporters, Attalus called for a meeting of the senate; before them, in a formal and elaborate speech, he declared his intention to restore the authority of the republic and to reclaim the provinces of Egypt and the East that had once acknowledged Rome's rule. Such grandiose promises filled every reasonable citizen with disdain for the character of a timid usurper, whose rise was viewed as the most humiliating blow the republic had suffered from the arrogance of the Barbarians. However, the general public, as usual, celebrated the new leadership. The public discontent worked in favor of Honorius's rival; and the followers, oppressed by his harsh edicts, hoped for some support, or at least tolerance, from a ruler who, in his home country of Ionia, had been raised in Pagan beliefs and later baptized by an Arian bishop. The early days of Attalus's reign were promising. A trusted officer was sent with a small troop to ensure the loyalty of Africa; most of Italy submitted to the fear of the Gothic forces; and although the city of Bologna resisted valiantly, the people of Milan, perhaps unhappy with Honorius's absence, welcomed the choice of the Roman senate with loud cheers. Leading a strong army, Alaric brought his royal captive nearly to the gates of Ravenna; a formal delegation of prominent officials, including Jovius, the Praetorian prefect, Valens, the master of both cavalry and infantry, the quaestor Potamius, and Julian, the chief of notaries, was introduced with military flair into the Gothic camp. On behalf of their ruler, they agreed to recognize the legitimate election of his rival and to split the provinces of Italy and the West between the two emperors. Their proposals were rejected with scorn, and the insult was worsened by Attalus's arrogant clemency, as he benevolently promised that if Honorius would immediately give up his title, he could spend the rest of his life in peaceful exile on a distant island. The plight of the son of Theodosius seemed so dire to those who best understood his strength and resources that Jovius and Valens, his minister and general, betrayed their loyalty, infamously abandoning their benefactor's failing cause to pledge their allegiance to his more fortunate rival. Stunned by such instances of domestic treachery, Honorius feared every servant's approach and every messenger's arrival. He dreaded the hidden enemies that might be lurking in his capital, his palace, his bedroom; and some ships waited in the harbor of Ravenna to carry the ousted monarch to the realm of his young nephew, the Eastern emperor.
But there is a Providence (such at least was the opinion of the historian Procopius) that watches over innocence and folly; and the pretensions of Honorius to its peculiar care cannot reasonably be disputed. At the moment when his despair, incapable of any wise or manly resolution, meditated a shameful flight, a seasonable reenforcement of four thousand veterans unexpectedly landed in the port of Ravenna. To these valiant strangers, whose fidelity had not been corrupted by the factions of the court, he committed the walls and gates of the city; and the slumbers of the emperor were no longer disturbed by the apprehension of imminent and internal danger. The favorable intelligence which was received from Africa suddenly changed the opinions of men, and the state of public affairs. The troops and officers, whom Attalus had sent into that province, were defeated and slain; and the active zeal of Heraclian maintained his own allegiance, and that of his people. The faithful count of Africa transmitted a large sum of money, which fixed the attachment of the Imperial guards; and his vigilance, in preventing the exportation of corn and oil, introduced famine, tumult, and discontent, into the walls of Rome. The failure of the African expedition was the source of mutual complaint and recrimination in the party of Attalus; and the mind of his protector was insensibly alienated from the interest of a prince, who wanted spirit to command, or docility to obey. The most imprudent measures were adopted, without the knowledge, or against the advice, of Alaric; and the obstinate refusal of the senate, to allow, in the embarkation, the mixture even of five hundred Goths, betrayed a suspicious and distrustful temper, which, in their situation, was neither generous nor prudent. The resentment of the Gothic king was exasperated by the malicious arts of Jovius, who had been raised to the rank of patrician, and who afterwards excused his double perfidy, by declaring, without a blush, that he had only seemed to abandon the service of Honorius, more effectually to ruin the cause of the usurper. In a large plain near Rimini, and in the presence of an innumerable multitude of Romans and Barbarians, the wretched Attalus was publicly despoiled of the diadem and purple; and those ensigns of royalty were sent by Alaric, as the pledge of peace and friendship, to the son of Theodosius. The officers who returned to their duty, were reinstated in their employments, and even the merit of a tardy repentance was graciously allowed; but the degraded emperor of the Romans, desirous of life, and insensible of disgrace, implored the permission of following the Gothic camp, in the train of a haughty and capricious Barbarian.
But there is a higher power (at least that was what the historian Procopius believed) that looks after innocence and foolishness; and Honorius’s claims to its special protection can’t be reasonably doubted. Just when his despair, unable to come up with any wise or courageous plan, was considering a shameful escape, a timely reinforcement of four thousand veterans unexpectedly arrived at the port of Ravenna. He entrusted the city's walls and gates to these brave newcomers, whose loyalty hadn’t been tainted by the factions at court, and the emperor could finally sleep without worrying about immediate internal threats. The positive news from Africa quickly shifted public opinion and the state of affairs. The troops and officers who Attalus had sent to that region were defeated and killed; meanwhile, Heraclian’s active commitment kept both his loyalty and that of his people intact. The loyal count of Africa sent a large amount of money, securing the allegiance of the Imperial guards; and his efforts to stop the exportation of grain and oil brought famine, chaos, and discontent to the walls of Rome. The failure of the African campaign led to blame and arguments within Attalus's faction; the mind of his supporter gradually drifted away from the interests of a prince who lacked the spirit to lead or the willingness to follow. The most reckless decisions were made without Alaric’s knowledge or against his advice; and the stubborn refusal of the senate to allow even five hundred Goths on board betrayed a suspicious and distrustful attitude that was neither noble nor wise given their situation. The anger of the Gothic king was intensified by the deceitful schemes of Jovius, who had been elevated to patrician status, and who later justified his betrayal by shamelessly claiming that he had only pretended to abandon Honorius’s service to more effectively undermine the usurper’s cause. In a large field near Rimini, in front of an enormous crowd of Romans and Barbarians, the unfortunate Attalus was publicly stripped of his crown and purple robes; these symbols of royalty were sent by Alaric as a token of peace and friendship to the son of Theodosius. The officers who returned to their duties were restored to their positions, and even the merit of a late change of heart was graciously accepted; but the deposed emperor of the Romans, eager to survive and oblivious to his disgrace, begged for permission to follow the Gothic camp, trailing behind a proud and unpredictable Barbarian.
The degradation of Attalus removed the only real obstacle to the conclusion of the peace; and Alaric advanced within three miles of Ravenna, to press the irresolution of the Imperial ministers, whose insolence soon returned with the return of fortune. His indignation was kindled by the report, that a rival chieftain, that Sarus, the personal enemy of Adolphus, and the hereditary foe of the house of Balti, had been received into the palace. At the head of three hundred followers, that fearless Barbarian immediately sallied from the gates of Ravenna; surprised, and cut in pieces, a considerable body of Goths; reentered the city in triumph; and was permitted to insult his adversary, by the voice of a herald, who publicly declared that the guilt of Alaric had forever excluded him from the friendship and alliance of the emperor. The crime and folly of the court of Ravenna was expiated, a third time, by the calamities of Rome. The king of the Goths, who no longer dissembled his appetite for plunder and revenge, appeared in arms under the walls of the capital; and the trembling senate, without any hopes of relief, prepared, by a desperate resistance, to defray the ruin of their country. But they were unable to guard against the secret conspiracy of their slaves and domestics; who, either from birth or interest, were attached to the cause of the enemy. At the hour of midnight, the Salarian gate was silently opened, and the inhabitants were awakened by the tremendous sound of the Gothic trumpet. Eleven hundred and sixty-three years after the foundation of Rome, the Imperial city, which had subdued and civilized so considerable a part of mankind, was delivered to the licentious fury of the tribes of Germany and Scythia.
The downfall of Attalus cleared away the last real barrier to peace; and Alaric moved within three miles of Ravenna to pressure the indecisive Imperial ministers, whose arrogance quickly returned with their luck. He was infuriated by the news that a rival chieftain, Sarus—Adolphus’s personal enemy and the hereditary foe of the Balti family—had been welcomed into the palace. Leading three hundred followers, that fearless Barbarian immediately charged out of the gates of Ravenna; he surprised and slaughtered a significant group of Goths; returned to the city in triumph; and was allowed to insult his opponent through a herald, who publicly proclaimed that Alaric's offenses had forever barred him from the emperor's friendship and alliance. The sins and foolishness of the Ravenna court were, yet again, atoned for by the misfortunes of Rome. The king of the Goths, who no longer concealed his desire for plunder and revenge, showed up armed at the city’s walls; and the fearful senate, with no hope for relief, readied themselves for a desperate stand to face the ruin of their country. However, they could not guard against the secret conspiracy of their slaves and servants, who, either by birth or interest, were loyal to the enemy’s cause. At midnight, the Salarian gate was quietly opened, and the citizens were jolted awake by the terrifying sound of the Gothic trumpet. Eleven hundred and sixty-three years after the foundation of Rome, the Imperial city, which had conquered and civilized so much of humanity, was surrendered to the uncontrolled rage of the German and Scythian tribes.
The proclamation of Alaric, when he forced his entrance into a vanquished city, discovered, however, some regard for the laws of humanity and religion. He encouraged his troops boldly to seize the rewards of valor, and to enrich themselves with the spoils of a wealthy and effeminate people: but he exhorted them, at the same time, to spare the lives of the unresisting citizens, and to respect the churches of the apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, as holy and inviolable sanctuaries. Amidst the horrors of a nocturnal tumult, several of the Christian Goths displayed the fervor of a recent conversion; and some instances of their uncommon piety and moderation are related, and perhaps adorned, by the zeal of ecclesiastical writers. While the Barbarians roamed through the city in quest of prey, the humble dwelling of an aged virgin, who had devoted her life to the service of the altar, was forced open by one of the powerful Goths. He immediately demanded, though in civil language, all the gold and silver in her possession; and was astonished at the readiness with which she conducted him to a splendid hoard of massy plate, of the richest materials, and the most curious workmanship. The Barbarian viewed with wonder and delight this valuable acquisition, till he was interrupted by a serious admonition, addressed to him in the following words: "These," said she, "are the consecrated vessels belonging to St. Peter: if you presume to touch them, the sacrilegious deed will remain on your conscience. For my part, I dare not keep what I am unable to defend." The Gothic captain, struck with reverential awe, despatched a messenger to inform the king of the treasure which he had discovered; and received a peremptory order from Alaric, that all the consecrated plate and ornaments should be transported, without damage or delay, to the church of the apostle. From the extremity, perhaps, of the Quirinal hill, to the distant quarter of the Vatican, a numerous detachment of Goths, marching in order of battle through the principal streets, protected, with glittering arms, the long train of their devout companions, who bore aloft, on their heads, the sacred vessels of gold and silver; and the martial shouts of the Barbarians were mingled with the sound of religious psalmody. From all the adjacent houses, a crowd of Christians hastened to join this edifying procession; and a multitude of fugitives, without distinction of age, or rank, or even of sect, had the good fortune to escape to the secure and hospitable sanctuary of the Vatican. The learned work, concerning the City of God, was professedly composed by St. Augustin, to justify the ways of Providence in the destruction of the Roman greatness. He celebrates, with peculiar satisfaction, this memorable triumph of Christ; and insults his adversaries, by challenging them to produce some similar example of a town taken by storm, in which the fabulous gods of antiquity had been able to protect either themselves or their deluded votaries.
The announcement from Alaric, as he broke into a defeated city, showed some respect for human and religious laws. He encouraged his troops to boldly claim the rewards of valor and enrich themselves with the riches of a wealthy, soft people, but he urged them at the same time to spare the lives of the defenseless citizens and to honor the churches of the apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, as sacred and inviolable sanctuaries. Amid the chaos of a nighttime uproar, several Christian Goths exhibited the passion of a recent conversion; some stories of their unusual piety and restraint have been documented, possibly embellished, by the enthusiasm of religious writers. While the Barbarians searched the city for loot, they broke into the modest home of an elderly virgin who had dedicated her life to serving at the altar. One of the powerful Goths immediately asked, although politely, for all the gold and silver she had, and was taken aback by how readily she led him to a magnificent stash of heavy silverware made from the finest materials and crafted with great skill. The Barbarian admired and delighted in this valuable find until he was interrupted by a serious warning from her: "These," she said, "are the consecrated vessels belonging to St. Peter; if you dare to touch them, that sacrilege will weigh on your conscience. As for me, I cannot keep what I cannot protect." The Gothic captain, filled with reverent awe, sent a messenger to inform the king of the treasure he had found, and received a firm order from Alaric that all the consecrated silverware and adornments should be moved, without harm or delay, to the church of the apostle. From perhaps the farthest point of the Quirinal hill to the distant area of the Vatican, a large group of Goths marched in battle formation through the main streets, guarding, with shining weapons, the long line of their devout companions carrying the sacred vessels of gold and silver on their heads; and the martial cries of the Barbarians blended with the sound of religious hymns. From all the nearby homes, crowds of Christians rushed to join this inspiring procession, and many fugitives, regardless of age, status, or even faith, were fortunate enough to find refuge in the safe and welcoming sanctuary of the Vatican. The scholarly work titled City of God was clearly written by St. Augustine to explain the actions of Providence in the downfall of Roman greatness. He proudly celebrates this memorable victory of Christ and taunts his opponents by daring them to show any similar case of a city that was sacked where the mythical gods of old were able to protect either themselves or their misled followers.
In the sack of Rome, some rare and extraordinary examples of Barbarian virtue have been deservedly applauded. But the holy precincts of the Vatican, and the apostolic churches, could receive a very small proportion of the Roman people; many thousand warriors, more especially of the Huns, who served under the standard of Alaric, were strangers to the name, or at least to the faith, of Christ; and we may suspect, without any breach of charity or candor, that in the hour of savage license, when every passion was inflamed, and every restraint was removed, the precepts of the Gospel seldom influenced the behavior of the Gothic Christians. The writers, the best disposed to exaggerate their clemency, have freely confessed, that a cruel slaughter was made of the Romans; and that the streets of the city were filled with dead bodies, which remained without burial during the general consternation. The despair of the citizens was sometimes converted into fury: and whenever the Barbarians were provoked by opposition, they extended the promiscuous massacre to the feeble, the innocent, and the helpless. The private revenge of forty thousand slaves was exercised without pity or remorse; and the ignominious lashes, which they had formerly received, were washed away in the blood of the guilty, or obnoxious, families. The matrons and virgins of Rome were exposed to injuries more dreadful, in the apprehension of chastity, than death itself; and the ecclesiastical historian has selected an example of female virtue, for the admiration of future ages. A Roman lady, of singular beauty and orthodox faith, had excited the impatient desires of a young Goth, who, according to the sagacious remark of Sozomen, was attached to the Arian heresy. Exasperated by her obstinate resistance, he drew his sword, and, with the anger of a lover, slightly wounded her neck. The bleeding heroine still continued to brave his resentment, and to repel his love, till the ravisher desisted from his unavailing efforts, respectfully conducted her to the sanctuary of the Vatican, and gave six pieces of gold to the guards of the church, on condition that they should restore her inviolate to the arms of her husband. Such instances of courage and generosity were not extremely common. The brutal soldiers satisfied their sensual appetites, without consulting either the inclination or the duties of their female captives: and a nice question of casuistry was seriously agitated, Whether those tender victims, who had inflexibly refused their consent to the violation which they sustained, had lost, by their misfortune, the glorious crown of virginity. Their were other losses indeed of a more substantial kind, and more general concern. It cannot be presumed, that all the Barbarians were at all times capable of perpetrating such amorous outrages; and the want of youth, or beauty, or chastity, protected the greatest part of the Roman women from the danger of a rape. But avarice is an insatiate and universal passion; since the enjoyment of almost every object that can afford pleasure to the different tastes and tempers of mankind may be procured by the possession of wealth. In the pillage of Rome, a just preference was given to gold and jewels, which contain the greatest value in the smallest compass and weight: but, after these portable riches had been removed by the more diligent robbers, the palaces of Rome were rudely stripped of their splendid and costly furniture. The sideboards of massy plate, and the variegated wardrobes of silk and purple, were irregularly piled in the wagons, that always followed the march of a Gothic army. The most exquisite works of art were roughly handled, or wantonly destroyed; many a statue was melted for the sake of the precious materials; and many a vase, in the division of the spoil, was shivered into fragments by the stroke of a battle-axe. The acquisition of riches served only to stimulate the avarice of the rapacious Barbarians, who proceeded, by threats, by blows, and by tortures, to force from their prisoners the confession of hidden treasure. Visible splendor and expense were alleged as the proof of a plentiful fortune; the appearance of poverty was imputed to a parsimonious disposition; and the obstinacy of some misers, who endured the most cruel torments before they would discover the secret object of their affection, was fatal to many unhappy wretches, who expired under the lash, for refusing to reveal their imaginary treasures. The edifices of Rome, though the damage has been much exaggerated, received some injury from the violence of the Goths. At their entrance through the Salarian gate, they fired the adjacent houses to guide their march, and to distract the attention of the citizens; the flames, which encountered no obstacle in the disorder of the night, consumed many private and public buildings; and the ruins of the palace of Sallust remained, in the age of Justinian, a stately monument of the Gothic conflagration. Yet a contemporary historian has observed, that fire could scarcely consume the enormous beams of solid brass, and that the strength of man was insufficient to subvert the foundations of ancient structures. Some truth may possibly be concealed in his devout assertion, that the wrath of Heaven supplied the imperfections of hostile rage; and that the proud Forum of Rome, decorated with the statues of so many gods and heroes, was levelled in the dust by the stroke of lightning.
In the sack of Rome, some rare and extraordinary examples of Barbarian virtue have been rightfully praised. However, the sacred areas of the Vatican and the apostolic churches could only accommodate a small fraction of the Roman populace; many thousands of warriors, particularly the Huns serving under Alaric, were unfamiliar with, or at least indifferent to, the name and faith of Christ. We can suspect, without lacking in charity or honesty, that during the chaos of violence, when every passion was heated and every restraint lifted, the teachings of the Gospel rarely influenced the actions of the Gothic Christians. Even those who were most inclined to exaggerate their mercy have openly admitted that a brutal slaughter of Romans occurred, and the city streets were lined with corpses, left unburied amidst the widespread panic. The despair of the citizens sometimes turned into rage, and whenever the Barbarians faced resistance, they extended their indiscriminate killings to the weak, the innocent, and the helpless. The personal vengeance of forty thousand enslaved people was carried out without mercy or regret; the shameful beatings they had previously endured were avenged in the blood of guilty or targeted families. The women and young girls of Rome were subjected to horrors that threatened their modesty, worse than death itself; and the church historian has highlighted an example of female virtue for future generations to admire. A Roman woman of extraordinary beauty and firm faith stirred the impatient desires of a young Goth who was, as noted by Sozomen, drawn to Arian heresy. Frustrated by her steadfast refusal, he drew his sword and, in a lover's rage, slightly wounded her neck. The bleeding heroine continued to defy him and reject his advances until the attacker, realizing his futile efforts, respectfully escorted her to the sanctuary of the Vatican and gave six pieces of gold to the church guards, on the condition they return her to her husband unharmed. Such acts of bravery and kindness were not particularly common. The savage soldiers satisfied their base desires without regard for the wishes or dignity of their female captives. A troubling question arose: whether those tender victims who adamantly refused consent to the assaults they endured had lost their precious virginity through their misfortune. There were, in fact, other losses that were more tangible and universally concerning. It’s unlikely that all the Barbarians were perpetually able to commit such intimate violations; many Roman women were protected from the threat of rape simply because they lacked youth, beauty, or virtue. But greed is an insatiable and universal desire; the satisfaction of nearly every human pleasure can be obtained with wealth. During the plundering of Rome, a clear priority was given to gold and jewels, which hold significant value in small quantities; however, once these portable treasures were taken by the quicker thieves, the opulent palaces of Rome were stripped of their splendid and expensive furnishings. Massive silverware and colorful silk and purple fabrics were haphazardly loaded onto the wagons following the Gothic army. The finest artworks were mishandled or recklessly destroyed; many statues were melted down for their valuable materials, and many vases were shattered into pieces by a battle-axe during the looting. The acquisition of riches only fueled the greed of the ravenous Barbarians, who used threats, violence, and torture to extract confessions of hidden treasures from their captives. Visible signs of wealth were taken as proof of a rich fortune; the appearance of poverty was seen as a sign of stinginess; and the stubbornness of some misers, who suffered extreme torture before revealing their elusive treasures, led to the suffering of many unfortunate individuals who died under torture for refusing to disclose their imaginary riches. Though the damage to Rome has often been exaggerated, some harm was indeed inflicted by the Goths. Upon entering through the Salarian gate, they set fire to nearby houses to help navigate their way and to distract the citizens; the flames, encountering no resistance in the chaos of the night, destroyed numerous private and public buildings. The ruins of Sallust's palace remained, even in Justinian's time, a grand reminder of the Gothic fire. Yet, a contemporary historian pointed out that fire could hardly consume the massive beams of solid brass, and no human strength could bring down the foundations of ancient structures. Some truth may lie in his devout claim that divine wrath compensated for the destructiveness of war; indeed, the renowned Forum of Rome, adorned with the statues of countless gods and heroes, was flattened by a bolt of lightning.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part V.
Whatever might be the numbers of equestrian or plebeian rank, who perished in the massacre of Rome, it is confidently affirmed that only one senator lost his life by the sword of the enemy. But it was not easy to compute the multitudes, who, from an honorable station and a prosperous fortune, were suddenly reduced to the miserable condition of captives and exiles. As the Barbarians had more occasion for money than for slaves, they fixed at a moderate price the redemption of their indigent prisoners; and the ransom was often paid by the benevolence of their friends, or the charity of strangers. The captives, who were regularly sold, either in open market, or by private contract, would have legally regained their native freedom, which it was impossible for a citizen to lose, or to alienate. But as it was soon discovered that the vindication of their liberty would endanger their lives; and that the Goths, unless they were tempted to sell, might be provoked to murder, their useless prisoners; the civil jurisprudence had been already qualified by a wise regulation, that they should be obliged to serve the moderate term of five years, till they had discharged by their labor the price of their redemption. The nations who invaded the Roman empire, had driven before them, into Italy, whole troops of hungry and affrighted provincials, less apprehensive of servitude than of famine. The calamities of Rome and Italy dispersed the inhabitants to the most lonely, the most secure, the most distant places of refuge. While the Gothic cavalry spread terror and desolation along the sea-coast of Campania and Tuscany, the little island of Igilium, separated by a narrow channel from the Argentarian promontory, repulsed, or eluded, their hostile attempts; and at so small a distance from Rome, great numbers of citizens were securely concealed in the thick woods of that sequestered spot. The ample patrimonies, which many senatorian families possessed in Africa, invited them, if they had time, and prudence, to escape from the ruin of their country, to embrace the shelter of that hospitable province. The most illustrious of these fugitives was the noble and pious Proba, the widow of the præfect Petronius. After the death of her husband, the most powerful subject of Rome, she had remained at the head of the Anician family, and successively supplied, from her private fortune, the expense of the consulships of her three sons. When the city was besieged and taken by the Goths, Proba supported, with Christian resignation, the loss of immense riches; embarked in a small vessel, from whence she beheld, at sea, the flames of her burning palace, and fled with her daughter Læta, and her granddaughter, the celebrated virgin, Demetrias, to the coast of Africa. The benevolent profusion with which the matron distributed the fruits, or the price, of her estates, contributed to alleviate the misfortunes of exile and captivity. But even the family of Proba herself was not exempt from the rapacious oppression of Count Heraclian, who basely sold, in matrimonial prostitution, the noblest maidens of Rome to the lust or avarice of the Syrian merchants. The Italian fugitives were dispersed through the provinces, along the coast of Egypt and Asia, as far as Constantinople and Jerusalem; and the village of Bethlem, the solitary residence of St. Jerom and his female converts, was crowded with illustrious beggars of either sex, and every age, who excited the public compassion by the remembrance of their past fortune. This awful catastrophe of Rome filled the astonished empire with grief and terror. So interesting a contrast of greatness and ruin, disposed the fond credulity of the people to deplore, and even to exaggerate, the afflictions of the queen of cities. The clergy, who applied to recent events the lofty metaphors of oriental prophecy, were sometimes tempted to confound the destruction of the capital and the dissolution of the globe.
Whatever the number of nobles or commoners who died in the massacre of Rome, it’s confidently said that only one senator lost his life to the enemy's sword. However, it was not easy to calculate how many others, once in honorable positions and enjoying wealth, were suddenly thrown into the terrible plight of captives and exiles. Since the Barbarians needed money more than slaves, they set a reasonable price for the release of their impoverished prisoners; often, friends or even strangers paid the ransom. The captives, who were sold in open markets or through private deals, would have regained their native freedom legally, which a citizen could never lose or give away. However, it soon became clear that claiming their freedom could put their lives in danger, and the Goths, if not tempted to sell, might be provoked to kill their useless prisoners. Therefore, civil law was revised with a wise regulation that required them to serve a moderate term of five years to repay the cost of their release through their labor. The nations invading the Roman Empire pushed entire groups of hungry and terrified provincials into Italy, who feared starvation more than slavery. The disasters that befell Rome and Italy scattered people to the most remote, secure, and distant places of refuge. While the Gothic cavalry spread fear and destruction along the coast of Campania and Tuscany, the small island of Igilium, just a narrow channel away from the Argentarian promontory, resisted or dodged their attacks, and many citizens found safe hiding in the thick woods of that secluded area. Many senator families, who had substantial estates in Africa, were tempted, if they had the time and sense, to flee the destruction of their homeland and seek refuge in that welcoming province. The most notable of these refugees was the noble and devoted Proba, widow of the prefect Petronius. After the death of her husband, Rome’s most powerful subject, she took charge of the Anician family and funded the consulships of her three sons from her own wealth. When the city was besieged and captured by the Goths, Proba faced the loss of vast riches with Christian acceptance; she boarded a small vessel and watched the flames consume her palace while fleeing with her daughter Læta and her granddaughter, the renowned virgin Demetrias, to the coast of Africa. The generous way in which she shared the fruits or proceeds from her estates helped ease the hardships of exile and captivity. But even Proba’s own family was not safe from the greedy oppression of Count Heraclian, who shamefully sold the finest young women of Rome into forced marriages to satisfy the lust or greed of Syrian merchants. The Italian refugees were scattered throughout the provinces, along the coasts of Egypt and Asia, all the way to Constantinople and Jerusalem; the village of Bethlehem, the secluded dwelling of St. Jerome and his female followers, became crowded with distinguished beggars of all genders and ages, who stirred public sympathy by recalling their former fortunes. This terrible disaster in Rome filled the astonished empire with grief and fear. Such a striking contrast between greatness and ruin led the devoted public to mourn, and even exaggerate, the misfortunes of the queen of cities. The clergy, applying the grand metaphors of ancient prophecy to these recent events, were sometimes tempted to confuse the fall of the capital with the end of the world.
There exists in human nature a strong propensity to depreciate the advantages, and to magnify the evils, of the present times. Yet, when the first emotions had subsided, and a fair estimate was made of the real damage, the more learned and judicious contemporaries were forced to confess, that infant Rome had formerly received more essential injury from the Gauls, than she had now sustained from the Goths in her declining age. The experience of eleven centuries has enabled posterity to produce a much more singular parallel; and to affirm with confidence, that the ravages of the Barbarians, whom Alaric had led from the banks of the Danube, were less destructive than the hostilities exercised by the troops of Charles the Fifth, a Catholic prince, who styled himself Emperor of the Romans. The Goths evacuated the city at the end of six days, but Rome remained above nine months in the possession of the Imperialists; and every hour was stained by some atrocious act of cruelty, lust, and rapine. The authority of Alaric preserved some order and moderation among the ferocious multitude which acknowledged him for their leader and king; but the constable of Bourbon had gloriously fallen in the attack of the walls; and the death of the general removed every restraint of discipline from an army which consisted of three independent nations, the Italians, the Spaniards, and the Germans. In the beginning of the sixteenth century, the manners of Italy exhibited a remarkable scene of the depravity of mankind. They united the sanguinary crimes that prevail in an unsettled state of society, with the polished vices which spring from the abuse of art and luxury; and the loose adventurers, who had violated every prejudice of patriotism and superstition to assault the palace of the Roman pontiff, must deserve to be considered as the most profligate of the Italians. At the same æra, the Spaniards were the terror both of the Old and New World: but their high-spirited valor was disgraced by gloomy pride, rapacious avarice, and unrelenting cruelty. Indefatigable in the pursuit of fame and riches, they had improved, by repeated practice, the most exquisite and effectual methods of torturing their prisoners: many of the Castilians, who pillaged Rome, were familiars of the holy inquisition; and some volunteers, perhaps, were lately returned from the conquest of Mexico. The Germans were less corrupt than the Italians, less cruel than the Spaniards; and the rustic, or even savage, aspect of those Tramontane warriors, often disguised a simple and merciful disposition. But they had imbibed, in the first fervor of the reformation, the spirit, as well as the principles of Luther. It was their favorite amusement to insult, or destroy, the consecrated objects of Catholic superstition; they indulged, without pity or remorse, a devout hatred against the clergy of every denomination and degree, who form so considerable a part of the inhabitants of modern Rome; and their fanatic zeal might aspire to subvert the throne of Antichrist, to purify, with blood and fire, the abominations of the spiritual Babylon.
There’s a strong tendency in human nature to downplay the benefits and exaggerate the problems of the present times. However, once the initial emotions settled down and a fair assessment of the actual damage was made, the more knowledgeable and sensible people of that time had to admit that early Rome had suffered greater harm from the Gauls than it had from the Goths in its later years. The experience of eleven centuries has allowed later generations to draw a more unique comparison; confidently stating that the destruction caused by the Barbarians led by Alaric, who came from the banks of the Danube, was less devastating than the attacks carried out by the troops of Charles the Fifth, a Catholic prince who called himself the Emperor of the Romans. The Goths left the city after six days, while Rome was under imperial control for more than nine months, with every hour tainted by horrific acts of cruelty, lust, and looting. Alaric maintained some order and restraint among the fierce crowd that recognized him as their leader and king; but the constable of Bourbon had bravely fallen while attacking the walls, and the general’s death eliminated all discipline from an army made up of three independent nations: the Italians, the Spaniards, and the Germans. In the early sixteenth century, Italy displayed a shocking level of human depravity. They combined the bloody crimes typical of an unstable society with the sophisticated vices arising from the misuse of art and luxury; and the reckless adventurers, who had disregarded all notions of patriotism and superstition to attack the pope’s palace, should be seen as the most immoral of the Italians. At the same time, the Spaniards struck fear into both the Old and New Worlds: yet their spirited courage was tarnished by dark pride, greedy avarice, and merciless cruelty. Tireless in their quest for fame and wealth, they had honed, through repeated practice, the most refined and effective ways of torturing their prisoners: many of the Castilians who sacked Rome were familiar with the holy inquisition; and some volunteers had perhaps recently returned from the conquest of Mexico. The Germans were less corrupt than the Italians and less cruel than the Spaniards; their rustic or even savage appearance often belied a kind and merciful nature. However, they had absorbed, in the early heat of the Reformation, both the spirit and the principles of Luther. It became their preferred pastime to insult or destroy the sacred objects of Catholic superstition; they indulged, without pity or remorse, in a zealous hatred toward the clergy of all ranks, who made up a significant portion of modern Rome's population; and their fanatical enthusiasm might have led them to aim for the overthrow of the Antichrist, seeking to purify the corruptions of spiritual Babylon with blood and fire.
The retreat of the victorious Goths, who evacuated Rome on the sixth day, might be the result of prudence; but it was not surely the effect of fear. At the head of an army encumbered with rich and weighty spoils, their intrepid leader advanced along the Appian way into the southern provinces of Italy, destroying whatever dared to oppose his passage, and contenting himself with the plunder of the unresisting country. The fate of Capua, the proud and luxurious metropolis of Campania, and which was respected, even in its decay, as the eighth city of the empire, is buried in oblivion; whilst the adjacent town of Nola has been illustrated, on this occasion, by the sanctity of Paulinus, who was successively a consul, a monk, and a bishop. At the age of forty, he renounced the enjoyment of wealth and honor, of society and literature, to embrace a life of solitude and penance; and the loud applause of the clergy encouraged him to despise the reproaches of his worldly friends, who ascribed this desperate act to some disorder of the mind or body. An early and passionate attachment determined him to fix his humble dwelling in one of the suburbs of Nola, near the miraculous tomb of St. Fælix, which the public devotion had already surrounded with five large and populous churches. The remains of his fortune, and of his understanding, were dedicated to the service of the glorious martyr; whose praise, on the day of his festival, Paulinus never failed to celebrate by a solemn hymn; and in whose name he erected a sixth church, of superior elegance and beauty, which was decorated with many curious pictures, from the history of the Old and New Testament. Such assiduous zeal secured the favor of the saint, or at least of the people; and, after fifteen years' retirement, the Roman consul was compelled to accept the bishopric of Nola, a few months before the city was invested by the Goths. During the siege, some religious persons were satisfied that they had seen, either in dreams or visions, the divine form of their tutelar patron; yet it soon appeared by the event, that Fælix wanted power, or inclination, to preserve the flock of which he had formerly been the shepherd. Nola was not saved from the general devastation; and the captive bishop was protected only by the general opinion of his innocence and poverty. Above four years elapsed from the successful invasion of Italy by the arms of Alaric, to the voluntary retreat of the Goths under the conduct of his successor Adolphus; and, during the whole time, they reigned without control over a country, which, in the opinion of the ancients, had united all the various excellences of nature and art. The prosperity, indeed, which Italy had attained in the auspicious age of the Antonines, had gradually declined with the decline of the empire. The fruits of a long peace perished under the rude grasp of the Barbarians; and they themselves were incapable of tasting the more elegant refinements of luxury, which had been prepared for the use of the soft and polished Italians. Each soldier, however, claimed an ample portion of the substantial plenty, the corn and cattle, oil and wine, that was daily collected and consumed in the Gothic camp; and the principal warriors insulted the villas and gardens, once inhabited by Lucullus and Cicero, along the beauteous coast of Campania. Their trembling captives, the sons and daughters of Roman senators, presented, in goblets of gold and gems, large draughts of Falernian wine to the haughty victors; who stretched their huge limbs under the shade of plane-trees, artificially disposed to exclude the scorching rays, and to admit the genial warmth, of the sun. These delights were enhanced by the memory of past hardships: the comparison of their native soil, the bleak and barren hills of Scythia, and the frozen banks of the Elbe and Danube, added new charms to the felicity of the Italian climate.
The retreat of the victorious Goths, who left Rome on the sixth day, might have been a wise decision, but it certainly wasn't out of fear. Leading an army loaded with valuable spoils, their fearless leader marched along the Appian Way into southern Italy, destroying anything that tried to stop him and enjoying the loot from the unresisting land. The fate of Capua, the proud and luxurious capital of Campania, which was still respected even in its decline as the eighth city of the empire, has faded into obscurity; meanwhile, the nearby town of Nola gained prominence through the piety of Paulinus, who was a consul, a monk, and a bishop. At the age of forty, he gave up the pleasures of wealth and status, society and literature, to embrace a life of solitude and penance; the enthusiastic support of the clergy encouraged him to ignore the criticisms of his worldly friends, who thought his drastic decision was a result of some mental or physical issue. A deep passion led him to settle in a modest home in one of the suburbs of Nola, close to the miraculous tomb of St. Fælix, which public devotion had already surrounded with five large, busy churches. The remnants of his wealth and intellect were dedicated to serving the glorious martyr; he never failed to celebrate the martyr's praise with a solemn hymn on the day of his festival and, in his name, he built a sixth church that was more elegant and beautiful, adorned with many intricate paintings from the stories of the Old and New Testament. His devoted efforts won him the saint’s favor, or at least the people’s, and after fifteen years of seclusion, the Roman consul was reluctantly compelled to take on the bishopric of Nola, just months before the city was besieged by the Goths. During the siege, some devout individuals were convinced they had seen, whether in dreams or visions, the divine presence of their patron saint; however, events soon showed that Fælix lacked the power or desire to protect his flock. Nola did not escape the widespread destruction, and the captured bishop was safeguarded only by the general belief in his innocence and poverty. Over four years passed from the successful invasion of Italy by Alaric's forces to the voluntary retreat of the Goths under his successor Adolphus, and throughout this time, they ruled unchecked over a land that, according to the ancients, combined all the various beauties of nature and art. The prosperity that Italy had enjoyed during the favorable era of the Antonines gradually faded with the empire's decline. The benefits of long-standing peace vanished under the harsh control of the Barbarians, who themselves could not appreciate the more refined luxuries prepared for the delicate and cultured Italians. Nevertheless, each soldier claimed a generous share of the abundant food, grains, cattle, oil, and wine that was daily gathered and consumed in the Gothic camp; and the top warriors ravaged the villas and gardens once lived in by Lucullus and Cicero along the beautiful coast of Campania. Their terrified captives, the sons and daughters of Roman senators, presented large bowls of golden goblets filled with precious Falernian wine to the arrogant victors, who reclined under the shade of plane trees artfully arranged to block out the harsh sun while allowing the pleasant warmth in. These pleasures were made even sweeter by recalling past hardships; the contrast of their homeland, the cold and barren hills of Scythia, and the icy banks of the Elbe and Danube, added new joys to the bliss of the Italian climate.
Whether fame, or conquest, or riches, were the object or Alaric, he pursued that object with an indefatigable ardor, which could neither be quelled by adversity nor satiated by success. No sooner had he reached the extreme land of Italy, than he was attracted by the neighboring prospect of a fertile and peaceful island. Yet even the possession of Sicily he considered only as an intermediate step to the important expedition, which he already meditated against the continent of Africa. The Straits of Rhegium and Messina are twelve miles in length, and, in the narrowest passage, about one mile and a half broad; and the fabulous monsters of the deep, the rocks of Scylla, and the whirlpool of Charybdis, could terrify none but the most timid and unskilful mariners. Yet as soon as the first division of the Goths had embarked, a sudden tempest arose, which sunk, or scattered, many of the transports; their courage was daunted by the terrors of a new element; and the whole design was defeated by the premature death of Alaric, which fixed, after a short illness, the fatal term of his conquests. The ferocious character of the Barbarians was displayed in the funeral of a hero whose valor and fortune they celebrated with mournful applause. By the labor of a captive multitude, they forcibly diverted the course of the Busentinus, a small river that washes the walls of Consentia. The royal sepulchre, adorned with the splendid spoils and trophies of Rome, was constructed in the vacant bed; the waters were then restored to their natural channel; and the secret spot, where the remains of Alaric had been deposited, was forever concealed by the inhuman massacre of the prisoners, who had been employed to execute the work.
Whether it was fame, conquest, or wealth that drove Alaric, he pursued his goals with an unstoppable passion that could not be dampened by setbacks or satisfied by achievements. As soon as he arrived in Italy, he was drawn to the nearby sight of a rich and peaceful island. However, he viewed gaining Sicily as just a stepping stone toward the significant campaign he was planning against the continent of Africa. The Straits of Rhegium and Messina are twelve miles long and, at their narrowest point, about one and a half miles wide; the legendary sea monsters, the rocks of Scylla, and the whirlpool of Charybdis would only frighten the most cowardly and inexperienced sailors. But as soon as the first group of Goths set sail, a sudden storm hit, sinking or scattering many of the ships. Their courage faltered in the face of the unknown waters, and the entire plan was thwarted by Alaric's early death, which followed a short illness and marked the tragic end of his conquests. The brutal nature of the Barbarians was evident during the funeral of a hero they honored with somber applause for his bravery and luck. With the work of a captured multitude, they forcefully redirected the course of the Busentinus, a small river that runs alongside the walls of Consentia. They built a royal tomb, adorned with the magnificent spoils and trophies of Rome, in the newly created area; then they restored the waters to their original path, and the secret location where Alaric's remains were laid to rest was forever hidden by the ruthless slaughter of the prisoners who had been made to carry out the task.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part VI.
The personal animosities and hereditary feuds of the Barbarians were suspended by the strong necessity of their affairs; and the brave Adolphus, the brother-in-law of the deceased monarch, was unanimously elected to succeed to his throne. The character and political system of the new king of the Goths may be best understood from his own conversation with an illustrious citizen of Narbonne; who afterwards, in a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, related it to St. Jerom, in the presence of the historian Orosius. "In the full confidence of valor and victory, I once aspired (said Adolphus) to change the face of the universe; to obliterate the name of Rome; to erect on its ruins the dominion of the Goths; and to acquire, like Augustus, the immortal fame of the founder of a new empire. By repeated experiments, I was gradually convinced, that laws are essentially necessary to maintain and regulate a well-constituted state; and that the fierce, untractable humor of the Goths was incapable of bearing the salutary yoke of laws and civil government. From that moment I proposed to myself a different object of glory and ambition; and it is now my sincere wish that the gratitude of future ages should acknowledge the merit of a stranger, who employed the sword of the Goths, not to subvert, but to restore and maintain, the prosperity of the Roman empire." With these pacific views, the successor of Alaric suspended the operations of war; and seriously negotiated with the Imperial court a treaty of friendship and alliance. It was the interest of the ministers of Honorius, who were now released from the obligation of their extravagant oath, to deliver Italy from the intolerable weight of the Gothic powers; and they readily accepted their service against the tyrants and Barbarians who infested the provinces beyond the Alps. Adolphus, assuming the character of a Roman general, directed his march from the extremity of Campania to the southern provinces of Gaul. His troops, either by force or agreement, immediately occupied the cities of Narbonne, Thoulouse, and Bordeaux; and though they were repulsed by Count Boniface from the walls of Marseilles, they soon extended their quarters from the Mediterranean to the Ocean. The oppressed provincials might exclaim, that the miserable remnant, which the enemy had spared, was cruelly ravished by their pretended allies; yet some specious colors were not wanting to palliate, or justify the violence of the Goths. The cities of Gaul, which they attacked, might perhaps be considered as in a state of rebellion against the government of Honorius: the articles of the treaty, or the secret instructions of the court, might sometimes be alleged in favor of the seeming usurpations of Adolphus; and the guilt of any irregular, unsuccessful act of hostility might always be imputed, with an appearance of truth, to the ungovernable spirit of a Barbarian host, impatient of peace or discipline. The luxury of Italy had been less effectual to soften the temper, than to relax the courage, of the Goths; and they had imbibed the vices, without imitating the arts and institutions, of civilized society.
The personal grudges and inherited conflicts of the Barbarians were put on hold due to the pressing needs of their situation; and the courageous Adolphus, the brother-in-law of the deceased king, was unanimously chosen to take his place on the throne. You can best understand the character and political approach of the new king of the Goths through his conversation with a notable citizen of Narbonne, who later shared it during a pilgrimage to the Holy Land with St. Jerome, in front of the historian Orosius. "In my confidence in bravery and victory," Adolphus said, "I once aimed to change the world; to erase the name of Rome; to establish the rule of the Goths on its ruins; and to earn, like Augustus, the timeless reputation of founding a new empire. Through repeated trials, I came to realize that laws are essential for maintaining and regulating a well-functioning state; and that the fierce, unruly nature of the Goths could not tolerate the beneficial structure of laws and civil order. From that moment, I set a different goal for glory and ambition; and it is now my genuine hope that future generations will recognize the contributions of a foreigner who used the Goths' sword not to destroy, but to restore and maintain the prosperity of the Roman Empire." With these peaceful intentions, Alaric's successor paused military actions and earnestly negotiated a treaty of friendship and alliance with the Imperial court. It was in the interest of Honorius's ministers, now free from their excessive oaths, to liberate Italy from the unbearable burden of the Gothic forces; they gladly accepted their help against the tyrants and Barbarians troubling the provinces beyond the Alps. Adolphus, taking on the role of a Roman general, led his army from the far reaches of Campania to the southern provinces of Gaul. His troops quickly occupied the cities of Narbonne, Toulouse, and Bordeaux by force or agreement; and although they were repelled by Count Boniface from the walls of Marseilles, their presence soon spread from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic. The oppressed locals might claim that the miserable remnants spared by the enemy were brutally exploited by their so-called allies; yet there were still plausible excuses to downplay or justify the Goths' aggression. The cities of Gaul that they attacked could perhaps be seen as rebelling against Honorius's government: the terms of the treaty or the secret orders from the court could sometimes be used to support Adolphus's apparent overreach; and the blame for any irregular or unsuccessful acts of aggression could always be attributed, with a semblance of truth, to the uncontrollable nature of a Barbarian army, unwilling to accept peace or discipline. The luxury of Italy had done less to soften the Goths' temperament than to weaken their courage; and they had adopted the vices without embracing the arts and institutions of civilized society.
The professions of Adolphus were probably sincere, and his attachment to the cause of the republic was secured by the ascendant which a Roman princess had acquired over the heart and understanding of the Barbarian king. Placidia, the daughter of the great Theodosius, and of Galla, his second wife, had received a royal education in the palace of Constantinople; but the eventful story of her life is connected with the revolutions which agitated the Western empire under the reign of her brother Honorius. When Rome was first invested by the arms of Alaric, Placidia, who was then about twenty years of age, resided in the city; and her ready consent to the death of her cousin Serena has a cruel and ungrateful appearance, which, according to the circumstances of the action, may be aggravated, or excused, by the consideration of her tender age. The victorious Barbarians detained, either as a hostage or a captive, the sister of Honorius; but, while she was exposed to the disgrace of following round Italy the motions of a Gothic camp, she experienced, however, a decent and respectful treatment. The authority of Jornandes, who praises the beauty of Placidia, may perhaps be counterbalanced by the silence, the expressive silence, of her flatterers: yet the splendor of her birth, the bloom of youth, the elegance of manners, and the dexterous insinuation which she condescended to employ, made a deep impression on the mind of Adolphus; and the Gothic king aspired to call himself the brother of the emperor. The ministers of Honorius rejected with disdain the proposal of an alliance so injurious to every sentiment of Roman pride; and repeatedly urged the restitution of Placidia, as an indispensable condition of the treaty of peace. But the daughter of Theodosius submitted, without reluctance, to the desires of the conqueror, a young and valiant prince, who yielded to Alaric in loftiness of stature, but who excelled in the more attractive qualities of grace and beauty. The marriage of Adolphus and Placidia was consummated before the Goths retired from Italy; and the solemn, perhaps the anniversary day of their nuptials was afterwards celebrated in the house of Ingenuus, one of the most illustrious citizens of Narbonne in Gaul. The bride, attired and adorned like a Roman empress, was placed on a throne of state; and the king of the Goths, who assumed, on this occasion, the Roman habit, contented himself with a less honorable seat by her side. The nuptial gift, which, according to the custom of his nation, was offered to Placidia, consisted of the rare and magnificent spoils of her country. Fifty beautiful youths, in silken robes, carried a basin in each hand; and one of these basins was filled with pieces of gold, the other with precious stones of an inestimable value. Attalus, so long the sport of fortune, and of the Goths, was appointed to lead the chorus of the Hymeneal song; and the degraded emperor might aspire to the praise of a skilful musician. The Barbarians enjoyed the insolence of their triumph; and the provincials rejoiced in this alliance, which tempered, by the mild influence of love and reason, the fierce spirit of their Gothic lord.
The professions of Adolphus were likely genuine, and his commitment to the republic was solidified by the influence that a Roman princess had over the heart and mind of the Barbarian king. Placidia, the daughter of the great Theodosius and his second wife, Galla, received an aristocratic education in the palace of Constantinople. However, the dramatic events of her life are tied to the upheavals that shook the Western empire during her brother Honorius's reign. When Rome was first besieged by Alaric's forces, Placidia, around twenty years old at the time, was living in the city; her quick agreement to the death of her cousin Serena appears cruel and ungrateful, a judgment that can be made harsher or softened considering her young age. The victorious Barbarians held the sister of Honorius either as a hostage or a captive; yet, although she was subjected to the embarrassment of trailing a Gothic army throughout Italy, she received decent and respectful treatment. Jornandes, who commends Placidia's beauty, may be balanced by the silence, a telling silence, of her admirers: yet, the prestige of her birth, her youthful charm, her graceful manners, and her clever flattery left a strong impression on Adolphus, leading the Gothic king to want to consider himself the emperor's brother. Honorius’s advisors dismissed the suggestion of a marriage that would bring shame to Roman pride, insisting repeatedly that Placidia must be returned as a crucial part of any peace agreement. However, the daughter of Theodosius willingly agreed to the wishes of the conqueror, a young and brave prince, who, though shorter than Alaric, excelled in charm and attractiveness. The marriage between Adolphus and Placidia was finalized before the Goths left Italy; subsequently, the significant, possibly anniversary, day of their wedding was celebrated at the home of Ingenuus, one of Narbonne's most notable citizens in Gaul. The bride, dressed and adorned like a Roman empress, was seated on a state throne, while the king of the Goths, who wore Roman attire for the occasion, settled for a less prestigious seat beside her. The wedding gift offered to Placidia, according to his people's tradition, consisted of rare and magnificent treasures from her homeland. Fifty handsome youths, dressed in silk robes, carried a basin in each hand; one contained gold pieces, and the other was filled with priceless gems. Attalus, long a pawn of fate and the Goths, was chosen to lead the celebratory wedding song; even the fallen emperor could boast of being a skilled musician. The Barbarians reveled in their triumph, and the locals celebrated this alliance, which softened the fierce nature of their Gothic lord with the gentle influences of love and reason.
The hundred basins of gold and gems, presented to Placidia at her nuptial feast, formed an inconsiderable portion of the Gothic treasures; of which some extraordinary specimens may be selected from the history of the successors of Adolphus. Many curious and costly ornaments of pure gold, enriched with jewels, were found in their palace of Narbonne, when it was pillaged, in the sixth century, by the Franks: sixty cups, caps, or chalices; fifteen patens, or plates, for the use of the communion; twenty boxes, or cases, to hold the books of the Gospels: this consecrated wealth was distributed by the son of Clovis among the churches of his dominions, and his pious liberality seems to upbraid some former sacrilege of the Goths. They possessed, with more security of conscience, the famous missorium, or great dish for the service of the table, of massy gold, of the weight of five hundred pounds, and of far superior value, from the precious stones, the exquisite workmanship, and the tradition, that it had been presented by Ætius, the patrician, to Torismond, king of the Goths. One of the successors of Torismond purchased the aid of the French monarch by the promise of this magnificent gift. When he was seated on the throne of Spain, he delivered it with reluctance to the ambassadors of Dagobert; despoiled them on the road; stipulated, after a long negotiation, the inadequate ransom of two hundred thousand pieces of gold; and preserved the missorium, as the pride of the Gothic treasury. When that treasury, after the conquest of Spain, was plundered by the Arabs, they admired, and they have celebrated, another object still more remarkable; a table of considerable size, of one single piece of solid emerald, encircled with three rows of fine pearls, supported by three hundred and sixty-five feet of gems and massy gold, and estimated at the price of five hundred thousand pieces of gold. Some portion of the Gothic treasures might be the gift of friendship, or the tribute of obedience; but the far greater part had been the fruits of war and rapine, the spoils of the empire, and perhaps of Rome.
The hundred basins of gold and gems given to Placidia at her wedding feast were just a small part of the Gothic treasures; some remarkable examples can be found in the history of Adolphus's successors. When the Franks looted their palace in Narbonne in the sixth century, they discovered many curious and costly ornaments made of pure gold, adorned with jewels: sixty cups, caps, or chalices; fifteen patens, or plates for communion; twenty boxes or cases for the Gospels. This sacred wealth was distributed by Clovis’s son among the churches in his territories, and his generous act seems to condemn some past sacrileges of the Goths. They held onto the famous missorium, a large dish made of solid gold weighing five hundred pounds, which was of even more value due to its precious stones, exquisite craftsmanship, and the legend that it was given by Ætius, the patrician, to Torismond, the king of the Goths. One of Torismond's successors won the French king’s support by promising this magnificent gift. However, once seated on the throne of Spain, he hesitated to hand it over to Dagobert’s ambassadors and ended up robbing them on the way; after lengthy negotiations, he settled for a meager ransom of two hundred thousand gold pieces, keeping the missorium as a point of pride for the Gothic treasury. When the Arabs looted that treasury after conquering Spain, they marveled at and celebrated another even more remarkable piece: a large table made from a single piece of solid emerald, surrounded by three rows of fine pearls and supported by three hundred and sixty-five feet made of gems and solid gold, valued at five hundred thousand gold pieces. Some of the Gothic treasures may have come from friendship or tribute, but most were the results of war and plunder, the spoils of the empire, possibly even of Rome.
After the deliverance of Italy from the oppression of the Goths, some secret counsellor was permitted, amidst the factions of the palace, to heal the wounds of that afflicted country. By a wise and humane regulation, the eight provinces which had been the most deeply injured, Campania, Tuscany, Picenum, Samnium, Apulia, Calabria, Bruttium, and Lucania, obtained an indulgence of five years: the ordinary tribute was reduced to one fifth, and even that fifth was destined to restore and support the useful institution of the public posts. By another law, the lands which had been left without inhabitants or cultivation, were granted, with some diminution of taxes, to the neighbors who should occupy, or the strangers who should solicit them; and the new possessors were secured against the future claims of the fugitive proprietors. About the same time a general amnesty was published in the name of Honorius, to abolish the guilt and memory of all the involuntary offences which had been committed by his unhappy subjects, during the term of the public disorder and calamity A decent and respectful attention was paid to the restoration of the capital; the citizens were encouraged to rebuild the edifices which had been destroyed or damaged by hostile fire; and extraordinary supplies of corn were imported from the coast of Africa. The crowds that so lately fled before the sword of the Barbarians, were soon recalled by the hopes of plenty and pleasure; and Albinus, præfect of Rome, informed the court, with some anxiety and surprise, that, in a single day, he had taken an account of the arrival of fourteen thousand strangers. In less than seven years, the vestiges of the Gothic invasion were almost obliterated; and the city appeared to resume its former splendor and tranquillity. The venerable matron replaced her crown of laurel, which had been ruffled by the storms of war; and was still amused, in the last moment of her decay, with the prophecies of revenge, of victory, and of eternal dominion.
After Italy was freed from the oppression of the Goths, a secret advisor was allowed, amidst the palace factions, to mend the wounds of the troubled country. Through a wise and humane decision, the eight provinces that had been most severely affected—Campania, Tuscany, Picenum, Samnium, Apulia, Calabria, Bruttium, and Lucania—were granted a five-year tax break: the usual tribute was cut down to one-fifth, and even that amount was meant to restore and maintain the important public postal services. Another law allowed lands that had been abandoned or left uncultivated to be offered, with reduced taxes, to neighboring residents or outsiders who wanted them; the new owners were protected from any future claims by the former landowners. Around the same time, a general amnesty was declared in Honorius's name to erase the guilt and memory of all the involuntary offenses committed by his unfortunate subjects during the period of public disorder and disaster. Careful and respectful attention was given to restoring the capital; citizens were encouraged to rebuild the buildings that had been destroyed or damaged by enemy fire, and large supplies of grain were imported from the coast of Africa. The crowds that had recently fled from the Barbarians' swords were soon drawn back by the promise of abundance and enjoyment, and Albinus, the prefect of Rome, reported to the court, with some concern and surprise, that in just one day, he had counted the arrival of fourteen thousand newcomers. In less than seven years, the traces of the Gothic invasion were almost completely erased, and the city seemed to regain its former glory and peace. The revered matron readjusted her laurel crown, which had been tousled by the storms of war, and still entertained herself, even in her final moments of decline, with prophecies of revenge, victory, and everlasting rule.
This apparent tranquillity was soon disturbed by the approach of a hostile armament from the country which afforded the daily subsistence of the Roman people. Heraclian, count of Africa, who, under the most difficult and distressful circumstances, had supported, with active loyalty, the cause of Honorius, was tempted, in the year of his consulship, to assume the character of a rebel, and the title of emperor. The ports of Africa were immediately filled with the naval forces, at the head of which he prepared to invade Italy: and his fleet, when it cast anchor at the mouth of the Tyber, indeed surpassed the fleets of Xerxes and Alexander, if all the vessels, including the royal galley, and the smallest boat, did actually amount to the incredible number of three thousand two hundred. Yet with such an armament, which might have subverted, or restored, the greatest empires of the earth, the African usurper made a very faint and feeble impression on the provinces of his rival. As he marched from the port, along the road which leads to the gates of Rome, he was encountered, terrified, and routed, by one of the Imperial captains; and the lord of this mighty host, deserting his fortune and his friends, ignominiously fled with a single ship. When Heraclian landed in the harbor of Carthage, he found that the whole province, disdaining such an unworthy ruler, had returned to their allegiance. The rebel was beheaded in the ancient temple of Memory his consulship was abolished: and the remains of his private fortune, not exceeding the moderate sum of four thousand pounds of gold, were granted to the brave Constantius, who had already defended the throne, which he afterwards shared with his feeble sovereign. Honorius viewed, with supine indifference, the calamities of Rome and Italy; but the rebellious attempts of Attalus and Heraclian, against his personal safety, awakened, for a moment, the torpid instinct of his nature. He was probably ignorant of the causes and events which preserved him from these impending dangers; and as Italy was no longer invaded by any foreign or domestic enemies, he peaceably existed in the palace of Ravenna, while the tyrants beyond the Alps were repeatedly vanquished in the name, and by the lieutenants, of the son of Theodosius. In the course of a busy and interesting narrative I might possibly forget to mention the death of such a prince: and I shall therefore take the precaution of observing, in this place, that he survived the last siege of Rome about thirteen years.
This apparent calm was soon disrupted by the approach of a hostile force from the region that provided daily sustenance to the Roman people. Heraclian, the Count of Africa, who had shown active loyalty to Honorius under very tough circumstances, was tempted, during his consulship, to take on the role of a rebel and declare himself emperor. The ports of Africa were quickly filled with naval forces, as he prepared to invade Italy. His fleet, when it anchored at the mouth of the Tiber, truly outnumbered those of Xerxes and Alexander, if all the ships, including the royal galley and the smallest boat, really totaled an incredible three thousand two hundred. Yet, with such a powerful armada that could have toppled or restored the greatest empires, the African usurper made a very weak impact on the territories of his rival. As he marched away from the port along the road leading to Rome's gates, he was confronted, frightened, and defeated by one of the Imperial commanders; the leader of this massive army disgracefully fled on a single ship. When Heraclian landed in the harbor of Carthage, he discovered that the entire province, rejecting such an unworthy ruler, had returned to their allegiance. The rebel was executed in the ancient Temple of Memory, his consulship was revoked, and the remnants of his personal wealth, amounting to a modest sum of four thousand pounds of gold, were awarded to the brave Constantius, who had already defended the throne, which he later shared with his weak sovereign. Honorius observed the calamities facing Rome and Italy with indifference, but the rebellious actions of Attalus and Heraclian against his personal safety briefly stirred the dormant instincts of his nature. He was probably unaware of the reasons and events that protected him from these looming dangers, and since Italy was no longer invaded by foreign or domestic enemies, he lived peacefully in the palace of Ravenna, while the tyrants beyond the Alps were repeatedly defeated in the name and by the representatives of the son of Theodosius. In the course of a busy and engaging narrative, I might inadvertently forget to mention the death of such a prince; therefore, I will take the precaution of noting here that he survived the last siege of Rome by about thirteen years.
The usurpation of Constantine, who received the purple from the legions of Britain, had been successful, and seemed to be secure. His title was acknowledged, from the wall of Antoninus to the columns of Hercules; and, in the midst of the public disorder he shared the dominion, and the plunder, of Gaul and Spain, with the tribes of Barbarians, whose destructive progress was no longer checked by the Rhine or Pyrenees. Stained with the blood of the kinsmen of Honorius, he extorted, from the court of Ravenna, with which he secretly corresponded, the ratification of his rebellious claims. Constantine engaged himself, by a solemn promise, to deliver Italy from the Goths; advanced as far as the banks of the Po; and after alarming, rather than assisting, his pusillanimous ally, hastily returned to the palace of Arles, to celebrate, with intemperate luxury, his vain and ostentatious triumph. But this transient prosperity was soon interrupted and destroyed by the revolt of Count Gerontius, the bravest of his generals; who, during the absence of his son Constants, a prince already invested with the Imperial purple, had been left to command in the provinces of Spain. From some reason, of which we are ignorant, Gerontius, instead of assuming the diadem, placed it on the head of his friend Maximus, who fixed his residence at Tarragona, while the active count pressed forwards, through the Pyrenees, to surprise the two emperors, Constantine and Constans, before they could prepare for their defence. The son was made prisoner at Vienna, and immediately put to death: and the unfortunate youth had scarcely leisure to deplore the elevation of his family; which had tempted, or compelled him, sacrilegiously to desert the peaceful obscurity of the monastic life. The father maintained a siege within the walls of Arles; but those walls must have yielded to the assailants, had not the city been unexpectedly relieved by the approach of an Italian army. The name of Honorius, the proclamation of a lawful emperor, astonished the contending parties of the rebels. Gerontius, abandoned by his own troops, escaped to the confines of Spain; and rescued his name from oblivion, by the Roman courage which appeared to animate the last moments of his life. In the middle of the night, a great body of his perfidious soldiers surrounded and attacked his house, which he had strongly barricaded. His wife, a valiant friend of the nation of the Alani, and some faithful slaves, were still attached to his person; and he used, with so much skill and resolution, a large magazine of darts and arrows, that above three hundred of the assailants lost their lives in the attempt. His slaves when all the missile weapons were spent, fled at the dawn of day; and Gerontius, if he had not been restrained by conjugal tenderness, might have imitated their example; till the soldiers, provoked by such obstinate resistance, applied fire on all sides to the house. In this fatal extremity, he complied with the request of his Barbarian friend, and cut off his head. The wife of Gerontius, who conjured him not to abandon her to a life of misery and disgrace, eagerly presented her neck to his sword; and the tragic scene was terminated by the death of the count himself, who, after three ineffectual strokes, drew a short dagger, and sheathed it in his heart. The unprotected Maximus, whom he had invested with the purple, was indebted for his life to the contempt that was entertained of his power and abilities. The caprice of the Barbarians, who ravaged Spain, once more seated this Imperial phantom on the throne: but they soon resigned him to the justice of Honorius; and the tyrant Maximus, after he had been shown to the people of Ravenna and Rome, was publicly executed.
The takeover by Constantine, who gained power from the legions in Britain, was successful and appeared to be secure. His title was recognized from the Antonine Wall to the Pillars of Hercules; and amidst the public chaos, he shared control and wealth from Gaul and Spain with barbarian tribes, whose destructive advance was no longer held back by the Rhine or the Pyrenees. Covered in the blood of Honorius's relatives, he extracted the approval of his rebellious claims from the court of Ravenna, to which he was secretly communicating. Constantine made a solemn promise to liberate Italy from the Goths; he advanced as far as the banks of the Po but, rather than assisting his timid ally, alarmed him and quickly returned to the palace in Arles to celebrate his empty and showy triumph with excessive luxury. However, this brief prosperity was soon disrupted by the revolt of Count Gerontius, the bravest of his generals. While his son Constans, already crowned as emperor, was away, Gerontius was left in charge of the provinces of Spain. For reasons unknown to us, instead of taking the crown for himself, he placed it on his friend Maximus, who settled in Tarragona while Gerontius moved quickly through the Pyrenees to catch the two emperors, Constantine and Constans, off guard. The son was captured in Vienna and immediately executed; the unfortunate young man barely had time to lament his family's rise, which had tempted or forced him to abandon his peaceful monastic life. The father was under siege within the walls of Arles; but those walls would have fallen to the attackers if not for the unexpected arrival of an Italian army. The name of Honorius and the declaration of a legitimate emperor stunned the opposing rebel factions. Gerontius, deserted by his troops, fled to the borders of Spain; he preserved his legacy through the Roman bravery he showed in his final moments. In the dead of night, a large group of his treacherous soldiers surrounded and attacked his fortified house. His wife, a brave supporter of the Alani people, and some loyal slaves remained with him; he skillfully defended himself with a stockpile of darts and arrows, killing over three hundred of the attackers. Once all the projectile weapons were exhausted, his slaves fled at dawn; and Gerontius, held back only by his love for his wife, could have followed their example. The soldiers, angered by his fierce resistance, set fire to the house. In this dire situation, he agreed to his barbarian friend’s request and beheaded himself. Gerontius's wife, who pleaded with him not to leave her in a life of misery and shame, eagerly offered her neck to his sword; the tragic scene ended with the count himself, who after three failed attempts, drew a short dagger and plunged it into his heart. The defenseless Maximus, whom he had crowned, owed his life to the disdain others held for his power and competence. The whims of the Barbarians ravaging Spain placed this imperial figure back on the throne; but they soon handed him over to Honorius's justice. The tyrant Maximus was publicly executed after being displayed to the people of Ravenna and Rome.
The general, (Constantius was his name,) who raised by his approach the siege of Arles, and dissipated the troops of Gerontius, was born a Roman; and this remarkable distinction is strongly expressive of the decay of military spirit among the subjects of the empire. The strength and majesty which were conspicuous in the person of that general, marked him, in the popular opinion, as a candidate worthy of the throne, which he afterwards ascended. In the familiar intercourse of private life, his manners were cheerful and engaging; nor would he sometimes disdain, in the license of convivial mirth, to vie with the pantomimes themselves, in the exercises of their ridiculous profession. But when the trumpet summoned him to arms; when he mounted his horse, and, bending down (for such was his singular practice) almost upon the neck, fiercely rolled his large animated eyes round the field, Constantius then struck terror into his foes, and inspired his soldiers with the assurance of victory. He had received from the court of Ravenna the important commission of extirpating rebellion in the provinces of the West; and the pretended emperor Constantine, after enjoying a short and anxious respite, was again besieged in his capital by the arms of a more formidable enemy. Yet this interval allowed time for a successful negotiation with the Franks and Alemanni and his ambassador, Edobic, soon returned at the head of an army, to disturb the operations of the siege of Arles. The Roman general, instead of expecting the attack in his lines, boldly and perhaps wisely, resolved to pass the Rhone, and to meet the Barbarians. His measures were conducted with so much skill and secrecy, that, while they engaged the infantry of Constantius in the front, they were suddenly attacked, surrounded, and destroyed, by the cavalry of his lieutenant Ulphilas, who had silently gained an advantageous post in their rear. The remains of the army of Edobic were preserved by flight or submission, and their leader escaped from the field of battle to the house of a faithless friend; who too clearly understood, that the head of his obnoxious guest would be an acceptable and lucrative present for the Imperial general. On this occasion, Constantius behaved with the magnanimity of a genuine Roman. Subduing, or suppressing, every sentiment of jealousy, he publicly acknowledged the merit and services of Ulphilas; but he turned with horror from the assassin of Edobic; and sternly intimated his commands, that the camp should no longer be polluted by the presence of an ungrateful wretch, who had violated the laws of friendship and hospitality. The usurper, who beheld, from the walls of Arles, the ruin of his last hopes, was tempted to place some confidence in so generous a conqueror. He required a solemn promise for his security; and after receiving, by the imposition of hands, the sacred character of a Christian Presbyter, he ventured to open the gates of the city. But he soon experienced that the principles of honor and integrity, which might regulate the ordinary conduct of Constantius, were superseded by the loose doctrines of political morality. The Roman general, indeed, refused to sully his laurels with the blood of Constantine; but the abdicated emperor, and his son Julian, were sent under a strong guard into Italy; and before they reached the palace of Ravenna, they met the ministers of death.
The general, named Constantius, lifted the siege of Arles and dispersed Gerontius's troops. He was a Roman by birth, and this notable fact highlights the decline of military spirit among the empire's people. The strength and presence of that general made many see him as someone worthy of the throne, which he eventually claimed. In his everyday life, he was cheerful and charming; he sometimes even joined in the fun of banquets and competed with entertainers in their silly acts. But when the trumpet called him to battle, and he mounted his horse, leaning low (a unique habit of his), and fiercely scanned the field with his large, expressive eyes, Constantius instilled fear in his enemies and confidence in his soldiers. He received a crucial mission from the court of Ravenna to eradicate rebellion in the Western provinces. Meanwhile, the self-proclaimed emperor Constantine, after a brief and anxious pause, found himself under siege in his capital by a more formidable enemy. This break allowed for successful negotiations with the Franks and Alemanni, and his ambassador, Edobic, quickly returned with an army to disrupt the siege of Arles. Instead of waiting for the attack within his defenses, the bold—and perhaps wise—Roman general decided to cross the Rhone and meet the Barbarians head-on. His plans were executed with such skill and secrecy that, while the infantry of Constantius engaged in the front, they were unexpectedly attacked, surrounded, and defeated by the cavalry of his lieutenant Ulphilas, who had quietly occupied a strategic position behind them. The remnants of Edobic’s army either fled or surrendered, and their leader escaped to the home of a treacherous friend, who understood that turning in his unwelcome guest would earn him favor and rewards from the Imperial general. In this situation, Constantius showed the nobility of a true Roman. Setting aside any jealousy, he publicly acknowledged Ulphilas's talents and contributions, but turned away in disgust from Edobic’s assassin. He sternly ordered that the camp not be tainted by the presence of this ungrateful traitor, who had broken the laws of friendship and hospitality. The usurper, watching the collapse of his final hopes from the walls of Arles, was tempted to trust such a generous conqueror. He asked for a solemn guarantee of his safety; after receiving the sacred title of a Christian Presbyter through a ceremonial touch, he decided to open the city's gates. However, he soon discovered that the principles of honor and integrity that might guide Constantius’s usual behavior were overridden by the more flexible rules of political morality. The Roman general did refuse to stain his victories with Constantine’s blood, but the deposed emperor and his son Julian were sent under heavy guard to Italy; before reaching the palace in Ravenna, they encountered their grim fate.
At a time when it was universally confessed, that almost every man in the empire was superior in personal merit to the princes whom the accident of their birth had seated on the throne, a rapid succession of usurpers, regardless of the fate of their predecessors, still continued to arise. This mischief was peculiarly felt in the provinces of Spain and Gaul, where the principles of order and obedience had been extinguished by war and rebellion. Before Constantine resigned the purple, and in the fourth month of the siege of Arles, intelligence was received in the Imperial camp, that Jovinus has assumed the diadem at Mentz, in the Upper Germany, at the instigation of Goar, king of the Alani, and of Guntiarius, king of the Burgundians; and that the candidate, on whom they had bestowed the empire, advanced with a formidable host of Barbarians, from the banks of the Rhine to those of the Rhone. Every circumstance is dark and extraordinary in the short history of the reign of Jovinus. It was natural to expect, that a brave and skilful general, at the head of a victorious army, would have asserted, in a field of battle, the justice of the cause of Honorius. The hasty retreat of Constantius might be justified by weighty reasons; but he resigned, without a struggle, the possession of Gaul; and Dardanus, the Prætorian præfect, is recorded as the only magistrate who refused to yield obedience to the usurper. When the Goths, two years after the siege of Rome, established their quarters in Gaul, it was natural to suppose that their inclinations could be divided only between the emperor Honorius, with whom they had formed a recent alliance, and the degraded Attalus, whom they reserved in their camp for the occasional purpose of acting the part of a musician or a monarch. Yet in a moment of disgust, (for which it is not easy to assign a cause, or a date,) Adolphus connected himself with the usurper of Gaul; and imposed on Attalus the ignominious task of negotiating the treaty, which ratified his own disgrace. We are again surprised to read, that, instead of considering the Gothic alliance as the firmest support of his throne, Jovinus upbraided, in dark and ambiguous language, the officious importunity of Attalus; that, scorning the advice of his great ally, he invested with the purple his brother Sebastian; and that he most imprudently accepted the service of Sarus, when that gallant chief, the soldier of Honorius, was provoked to desert the court of a prince, who knew not how to reward or punish. Adolphus, educated among a race of warriors, who esteemed the duty of revenge as the most precious and sacred portion of their inheritance, advanced with a body of ten thousand Goths to encounter the hereditary enemy of the house of Balti. He attacked Sarus at an unguarded moment, when he was accompanied only by eighteen or twenty of his valiant followers. United by friendship, animated by despair, but at length oppressed by multitudes, this band of heroes deserved the esteem, without exciting the compassion, of their enemies; and the lion was no sooner taken in the toils, than he was instantly despatched. The death of Sarus dissolved the loose alliance which Adolphus still maintained with the usurpers of Gaul. He again listened to the dictates of love and prudence; and soon satisfied the brother of Placidia, by the assurance that he would immediately transmit to the palace of Ravenna the heads of the two tyrants, Jovinus and Sebastian. The king of the Goths executed his promise without difficulty or delay; the helpless brothers, unsupported by any personal merit, were abandoned by their Barbarian auxiliaries; and the short opposition of Valentia was expiated by the ruin of one of the noblest cities of Gaul. The emperor, chosen by the Roman senate, who had been promoted, degraded, insulted, restored, again degraded, and again insulted, was finally abandoned to his fate; but when the Gothic king withdrew his protection, he was restrained, by pity or contempt, from offering any violence to the person of Attalus. The unfortunate Attalus, who was left without subjects or allies, embarked in one of the ports of Spain, in search of some secure and solitary retreat: but he was intercepted at sea, conducted to the presence of Honorius, led in triumph through the streets of Rome or Ravenna, and publicly exposed to the gazing multitude, on the second step of the throne of his invincible conqueror. The same measure of punishment, with which, in the days of his prosperity, he was accused of menacing his rival, was inflicted on Attalus himself; he was condemned, after the amputation of two fingers, to a perpetual exile in the Isle of Lipari, where he was supplied with the decent necessaries of life. The remainder of the reign of Honorius was undisturbed by rebellion; and it may be observed, that, in the space of five years, seven usurpers had yielded to the fortune of a prince, who was himself incapable either of counsel or of action.
At a time when it was widely acknowledged that almost every man in the empire had more personal merit than the princes who had been placed on the throne by birthright, a rapid succession of usurpers continued to rise, disregarding the fate of their predecessors. This chaos was particularly felt in the provinces of Spain and Gaul, where war and rebellion had extinguished the principles of order and obedience. Before Constantine stepped down, and during the fourth month of the siege of Arles, news reached the Imperial camp that Jovinus had taken the crown in Mentz, Upper Germany, urged on by Goar, king of the Alani, and Guntiarius, king of the Burgundians; and that the candidate they had chosen to rule was marching with a large army of Barbarians from the Rhine to the Rhone. Every detail in the brief history of Jovinus’s reign is dark and unusual. It was natural to expect that a brave and skilled general, leading a victorious army, would assert the justice of Honorius's cause in battle. Constantius's hasty retreat might be justified for various reasons; however, he surrendered Gaul without a fight, and Dardanus, the Prætorian præfect, was noted as the only official who refused to obey the usurper. When the Goths established their camp in Gaul two years after the siege of Rome, it seemed logical to think that their loyalties would lie only between Emperor Honorius, with whom they had formed a recent alliance, and the disgraced Attalus, whom they kept around as a sort of musician or puppet king. Yet, in a moment of discontent, for which it's hard to pinpoint a cause or date, Adolphus allied himself with the usurper of Gaul and tasked Attalus with the humiliating job of negotiating the treaty that confirmed his own disgrace. We are again taken aback to find that, instead of viewing the Gothic alliance as the strongest support for his throne, Jovinus criticized the persistent pleas of Attalus in vague and unclear terms; scornfully rejecting the advice of his powerful ally, he crowned his brother Sebastian as co-emperor; and, rashly, he accepted the loyalty of Sarus, despite that brave warrior, a soldier of Honorius, feeling compelled to leave the court of a prince who didn’t know how to reward or punish him. Adolphus, raised among warriors who considered vengeance a sacred duty, moved forward with ten thousand Goths to confront the traditional enemy of the Balti family. He attacked Sarus at an unguarded moment, accompanied only by eighteen or twenty of his loyal followers. United by friendship and driven by desperation, but ultimately overwhelmed by numbers, this group of heroes earned the respect, even without pity, from their adversaries; and as soon as the lion was captured, he was quickly killed. The death of Sarus broke the loose alliance that Adolphus still had with the usurpers of Gaul. He heeded the calls of love and wisdom; soon he assured Placidia’s brother that he would send the heads of the two tyrants, Jovinus and Sebastian, to Ravenna’s palace. The Gothic king fulfilled his promise without difficulty; the defenseless brothers, lacking any personal merit, were deserted by their Barbarian allies; and the brief resistance of Valentia was paid for with the destruction of one of Gaul's finest cities. The emperor, chosen by the Roman senate, who had been promoted, demoted, insulted, reinstated, and insulted again, was finally left to his fate; but when the Gothic king withdrew his support, he hesitated, out of pity or disdain, to harm Attalus. The unfortunate Attalus, abandoned without subjects or allies, boarded a ship in one of Spain’s ports, seeking a safe and isolated refuge: but he was intercepted at sea, brought before Honorius, paraded triumphantly through the streets of Rome or Ravenna, and displayed to the public, on the second level of the throne of his unbeatable conqueror. The same punishment he had once been accused of threatening his rival with, was inflicted upon Attalus himself; after having two fingers amputated, he was sentenced to perpetual exile on the Isle of Lipari, where he received the basic necessities of life. The remainder of Honorius’s reign was free from rebellion; and it should be noted that, within five years, seven usurpers had succumbed to the fate of a prince who was himself incapable of making decisions or taking action.
Chapter XXXI: Invasion Of Italy, Occupation Of Territories By Barbarians.—Part VII.
The situation of Spain, separated, on all sides, from the enemies of Rome, by the sea, by the mountains, and by intermediate provinces, had secured the long tranquillity of that remote and sequestered country; and we may observe, as a sure symptom of domestic happiness, that, in a period of four hundred years, Spain furnished very few materials to the history of the Roman empire. The footsteps of the Barbarians, who, in the reign of Gallienus, had penetrated beyond the Pyrenees, were soon obliterated by the return of peace; and in the fourth century of the Christian æra, the cities of Emerita, or Merida, of Corduba, Seville, Bracara, and Tarragona, were numbered with the most illustrious of the Roman world. The various plenty of the animal, the vegetable, and the mineral kingdoms, was improved and manufactured by the skill of an industrious people; and the peculiar advantages of naval stores contributed to support an extensive and profitable trade. The arts and sciences flourished under the protection of the emperors; and if the character of the Spaniards was enfeebled by peace and servitude, the hostile approach of the Germans, who had spread terror and desolation from the Rhine to the Pyrenees, seemed to rekindle some sparks of military ardor. As long as the defence of the mountains was intrusted to the hardy and faithful militia of the country, they successfully repelled the frequent attempts of the Barbarians. But no sooner had the national troops been compelled to resign their post to the Honorian bands, in the service of Constantine, than the gates of Spain were treacherously betrayed to the public enemy, about ten months before the sack of Rome by the Goths. The consciousness of guilt, and the thirst of rapine, prompted the mercenary guards of the Pyrenees to desert their station; to invite the arms of the Suevi, the Vandals, and the Alani; and to swell the torrent which was poured with irresistible violence from the frontiers of Gaul to the sea of Africa. The misfortunes of Spain may be described in the language of its most eloquent historian, who has concisely expressed the passionate, and perhaps exaggerated, declamations of contemporary writers. "The irruption of these nations was followed by the most dreadful calamities; as the Barbarians exercised their indiscriminate cruelty on the fortunes of the Romans and the Spaniards, and ravaged with equal fury the cities and the open country. The progress of famine reduced the miserable inhabitants to feed on the flesh of their fellow-creatures; and even the wild beasts, who multiplied, without control, in the desert, were exasperated, by the taste of blood, and the impatience of hunger, boldly to attack and devour their human prey. Pestilence soon appeared, the inseparable companion of famine; a large proportion of the people was swept away; and the groans of the dying excited only the envy of their surviving friends. At length the Barbarians, satiated with carnage and rapine, and afflicted by the contagious evils which they themselves had introduced, fixed their permanent seats in the depopulated country. The ancient Gallicia, whose limits included the kingdom of Old Castille, was divided between the Suevi and the Vandals; the Alani were scattered over the provinces of Carthagena and Lusitania, from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic Ocean; and the fruitful territory of Baetica was allotted to the Silingi, another branch of the Vandalic nation. After regulating this partition, the conquerors contracted with their new subjects some reciprocal engagements of protection and obedience: the lands were again cultivated; and the towns and villages were again occupied by a captive people. The greatest part of the Spaniards was even disposed to prefer this new condition of poverty and barbarism, to the severe oppressions of the Roman government; yet there were many who still asserted their native freedom; and who refused, more especially in the mountains of Gallicia, to submit to the Barbarian yoke."
The situation in Spain, surrounded on all sides by the enemies of Rome—by the sea, mountains, and neighboring provinces—ensured a long period of peace for this remote and isolated country. A clear sign of domestic happiness is that, over four hundred years, Spain contributed very little to the history of the Roman Empire. The traces of the Barbarians, who had invaded the region during Gallienus's reign, were quickly erased with the return of peace. By the fourth century of the Christian era, cities like Emerita (Merida), Corduba, Seville, Bracara, and Tarragona were among the most distinguished in the Roman world. The abundant resources from the animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms were enhanced and utilized by a hardworking populace, and the unique advantages of naval supplies helped sustain a wide-ranging and profitable trade. The arts and sciences thrived under imperial protection; however, if the character of the Spaniards was weakened by peace and servitude, the looming threat of the Germans—who spread fear and destruction from the Rhine to the Pyrenees—seemed to reignite some sparks of military spirit. As long as the defense of the mountains was entrusted to the brave and loyal militia of the region, they successfully fended off frequent Barbarian attacks. But as soon as the national troops had to surrender their positions to the Honorian forces serving Constantine, Spain's gates were treacherously handed over to the enemy, just ten months before the Goths sack Rome. The sense of guilt and hunger for plunder drove the mercenary guards of the Pyrenees to abandon their posts, inviting the Suevi, Vandals, and Alani to join the flood of chaos that surged from Gaul to the shores of Africa. The calamities that befell Spain can be articulated through the words of its most eloquent historian, who summed up the passionate—and perhaps exaggerated—claims of contemporary writers: "The influx of these nations brought about the most horrific disasters, as the Barbarians unleashed their indiscriminate brutality on both Romans and Spaniards, devastating cities and rural areas alike. Hunger forced the desperate population to resort to cannibalism, and the increase of wild beasts in the deserted land, spurred on by bloodlust and hunger, led them to boldly attack and consume humans. Soon, disease, an inevitable companion of famine, appeared; a significant portion of the population was wiped out, and the cries of the dying only evoked envy among the surviving. Eventually, the Barbarians, sated with slaughter and plunder and suffering from the contagious diseases they had spread, settled permanently in the now depopulated land. The ancient Gallicia, which encompassed the region of Old Castille, was split between the Suevi and the Vandals; the Alani were dispersed across Carthagena and Lusitania, from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic; and the fertile area of Baetica was assigned to the Silingi, another branch of the Vandal nation. After establishing this division, the conquerors made mutual agreements with their new subjects for protection and loyalty: the land was replanted, and towns and villages were once again occupied by a subdued population. Most Spaniards were even inclined to prefer this new state of poverty and barbarism over the harsh oppression of the Roman government; however, many still claimed their native freedom, particularly in the mountains of Gallicia, refusing to submit to barbarian dominance."
The important present of the heads of Jovinus and Sebastian had approved the friendship of Adolphus, and restored Gaul to the obedience of his brother Honorius. Peace was incompatible with the situation and temper of the king of the Goths. He readily accepted the proposal of turning his victorious arms against the Barbarians of Spain; the troops of Constantius intercepted his communication with the seaports of Gaul, and gently pressed his march towards the Pyrenees: he passed the mountains, and surprised, in the name of the emperor, the city of Barcelona. The fondness of Adolphus for his Roman bride, was not abated by time or possession: and the birth of a son, surnamed, from his illustrious grandsire, Theodosius, appeared to fix him forever in the interest of the republic. The loss of that infant, whose remains were deposited in a silver coffin in one of the churches near Barcelona, afflicted his parents; but the grief of the Gothic king was suspended by the labors of the field; and the course of his victories was soon interrupted by domestic treason. He had imprudently received into his service one of the followers of Sarus; a Barbarian of a daring spirit, but of a diminutive stature; whose secret desire of revenging the death of his beloved patron was continually irritated by the sarcasms of his insolent master. Adolphus was assassinated in the palace of Barcelona; the laws of the succession were violated by a tumultuous faction; and a stranger to the royal race, Singeric, the brother of Sarus himself, was seated on the Gothic throne. The first act of his reign was the inhuman murder of the six children of Adolphus, the issue of a former marriage, whom he tore, without pity, from the feeble arms of a venerable bishop. The unfortunate Placidia, instead of the respectful compassion, which she might have excited in the most savage breasts, was treated with cruel and wanton insult. The daughter of the emperor Theodosius, confounded among a crowd of vulgar captives, was compelled to march on foot above twelve miles, before the horse of a Barbarian, the assassin of a husband whom Placidia loved and lamented.
The significant gift of the heads of Jovinus and Sebastian had solidified Adolphus’s alliance and brought Gaul back under the control of his brother Honorius. Peace was not an option given the situation and mindset of the Gothic king. He quickly accepted the suggestion to direct his victorious forces against the Barbarians in Spain; Constantius’s troops interrupted his communications with the ports of Gaul and gently pushed him toward the Pyrenees. He crossed the mountains and captured the city of Barcelona in the name of the emperor. Adolphus’s affection for his Roman wife didn’t fade with time or possession, and the birth of a son, named after his illustrious grandfather, Theodosius, seemed to secure his loyalty to the republic. The loss of that infant, whose remains were laid to rest in a silver coffin in a church near Barcelona, deeply saddened his parents. However, the Gothic king’s grief was overshadowed by his military duties, and his string of victories was soon disrupted by treachery at home. He had foolishly brought into his service one of Sarus’s followers, a courageous but short Barbarian, whose lingering desire for revenge for his late patron was constantly fueled by the taunts of his arrogant master. Adolphus was assassinated in the palace of Barcelona; the succession laws were disregarded by a chaotic faction, and a stranger to the royal bloodline, Singeric, Sarus’s brother, took the Gothic throne. His first act as king was the brutal murder of Adolphus’s six children from a previous marriage, which he heartlessly seized from the frail arms of an elderly bishop. The unfortunate Placidia, rather than receiving the sympathy she might have inspired even in the cruelest hearts, faced brutal and wanton mockery. The daughter of Emperor Theodosius, mixed among a crowd of ordinary captives, was forced to walk over twelve miles in front of the horse of a Barbarian, the assassin of the husband she loved and mourned.
But Placidia soon obtained the pleasure of revenge, and the view of her ignominious sufferings might rouse an indignant people against the tyrant, who was assassinated on the seventh day of his usurpation. After the death of Singeric, the free choice of the nation bestowed the Gothic sceptre on Wallia; whose warlike and ambitious temper appeared, in the beginning of his reign, extremely hostile to the republic. He marched in arms from Barcelona to the shores of the Atlantic Ocean, which the ancients revered and dreaded as the boundary of the world. But when he reached the southern promontory of Spain, and, from the rock now covered by the fortress of Gibraltar, contemplated the neighboring and fertile coast of Africa, Wallia resumed the designs of conquest, which had been interrupted by the death of Alaric. The winds and waves again disappointed the enterprise of the Goths; and the minds of a superstitious people were deeply affected by the repeated disasters of storms and shipwrecks. In this disposition the successor of Adolphus no longer refused to listen to a Roman ambassador, whose proposals were enforced by the real, or supposed, approach of a numerous army, under the conduct of the brave Constantius. A solemn treaty was stipulated and observed; Placidia was honorably restored to her brother; six hundred thousand measures of wheat were delivered to the hungry Goths; and Wallia engaged to draw his sword in the service of the empire. A bloody war was instantly excited among the Barbarians of Spain; and the contending princes are said to have addressed their letters, their ambassadors, and their hostages, to the throne of the Western emperor, exhorting him to remain a tranquil spectator of their contest; the events of which must be favorable to the Romans, by the mutual slaughter of their common enemies. The Spanish war was obstinately supported, during three campaigns, with desperate valor, and various success; and the martial achievements of Wallia diffused through the empire the superior renown of the Gothic hero. He exterminated the Silingi, who had irretrievably ruined the elegant plenty of the province of Baetica. He slew, in battle, the king of the Alani; and the remains of those Scythian wanderers, who escaped from the field, instead of choosing a new leader, humbly sought a refuge under the standard of the Vandals, with whom they were ever afterwards confounded. The Vandals themselves, and the Suevi, yielded to the efforts of the invincible Goths. The promiscuous multitude of Barbarians, whose retreat had been intercepted, were driven into the mountains of Gallicia; where they still continued, in a narrow compass and on a barren soil, to exercise their domestic and implacable hostilities. In the pride of victory, Wallia was faithful to his engagements: he restored his Spanish conquests to the obedience of Honorius; and the tyranny of the Imperial officers soon reduced an oppressed people to regret the time of their Barbarian servitude. While the event of the war was still doubtful, the first advantages obtained by the arms of Wallia had encouraged the court of Ravenna to decree the honors of a triumph to their feeble sovereign. He entered Rome like the ancient conquerors of nations; and if the monuments of servile corruption had not long since met with the fate which they deserved, we should probably find that a crowd of poets and orators, of magistrates and bishops, applauded the fortune, the wisdom, and the invincible courage, of the emperor Honorius.
But Placidia soon got the satisfaction of revenge, and the sight of her shameful sufferings could incite an outraged people against the tyrant, who was assassinated just seven days after seizing power. After Singeric's death, the nation freely chose Wallia to take the Gothic throne; his warlike and ambitious nature seemed, at the start of his reign, very hostile to the republic. He marched from Barcelona to the Atlantic Ocean, which the ancients viewed with both reverence and fear as the edge of the world. When he reached the southern tip of Spain and gazed from the rock now crowned by the fortress of Gibraltar at the neighboring fertile coast of Africa, Wallia picked up the ambitions for conquest that had been stalled by Alaric's death. Once again, winds and waves thwarted the Goths' plans, and the minds of a superstitious people were severely affected by the repeated disasters of storms and shipwrecks. In this mindset, Adolphus's successor finally agreed to listen to a Roman ambassador, whose offers were backed by the real or supposed approach of a large army led by the brave Constantius. A formal treaty was made and kept; Placidia was honorably returned to her brother; six hundred thousand measures of wheat were given to the starving Goths; and Wallia promised to fight in the service of the empire. A bloody war erupted among the Barbarians of Spain right away; and it’s said that the rival princes sent letters, ambassadors, and hostages to the Western emperor, urging him to remain a calm observer of their conflict, the outcome of which would benefit the Romans through the mutual slaughter of their common enemies. The Spanish war was fiercely fought for three campaigns, with desperate bravery and mixed success; Wallia's military accomplishments spread the fame of the Gothic hero across the empire. He wiped out the Silingi, who had irreparably destroyed the rich bounty of the province of Baetica. He killed the king of the Alani in battle; and instead of finding a new leader, the Scythian survivors who escaped the battlefield humbly sought refuge under the Vandals' banner, with whom they would be forever associated. Both the Vandals and the Suevi succumbed to the might of the unstoppable Goths. The varied crowd of Barbarians, cut off in their retreat, were pushed into the mountains of Galicia; where they still remained, in a confined area and on barren land, engaged in their endless and bitter conflicts. In his victorious pride, Wallia kept his promises: he returned his Spanish conquests to the allegiance of Honorius; and the harsh rule of the imperial officials soon made the oppressed people long for the days of their Barbarian servitude. While the outcome of the war was still uncertain, Wallia's early victories encouraged the court in Ravenna to award their weak sovereign the honors of a triumph. He entered Rome like the ancient conquerors of nations; and if the remnants of corrupt servitude hadn't already met their deserved fate, we might have found a throng of poets, orators, magistrates, and bishops praising the fortune, wisdom, and unbeatable courage of Emperor Honorius.
Such a triumph might have been justly claimed by the ally of Rome, if Wallia, before he repassed the Pyrenees, had extirpated the seeds of the Spanish war. His victorious Goths, forty-three years after they had passed the Danube, were established, according to the faith of treaties, in the possession of the second Aquitain; a maritime province between the Garonne and the Loire, under the civil and ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Bourdeaux. That metropolis, advantageously situated for the trade of the ocean, was built in a regular and elegant form; and its numerous inhabitants were distinguished among the Gauls by their wealth, their learning, and the politeness of their manners. The adjacent province, which has been fondly compared to the garden of Eden, is blessed with a fruitful soil, and a temperate climate; the face of the country displayed the arts and the rewards of industry; and the Goths, after their martial toils, luxuriously exhausted the rich vineyards of Aquitain. The Gothic limits were enlarged by the additional gift of some neighboring dioceses; and the successors of Alaric fixed their royal residence at Thoulouse, which included five populous quarters, or cities, within the spacious circuit of its walls. About the same time, in the last years of the reign of Honorius, the Goths, the Burgundians, and the Franks, obtained a permanent seat and dominion in the provinces of Gaul. The liberal grant of the usurper Jovinus to his Burgundian allies, was confirmed by the lawful emperor; the lands of the First, or Upper, Germany, were ceded to those formidable Barbarians; and they gradually occupied, either by conquest or treaty, the two provinces which still retain, with the titles of Duchy and County, the national appellation of Burgundy. The Franks, the valiant and faithful allies of the Roman republic, were soon tempted to imitate the invaders, whom they had so bravely resisted. Treves, the capital of Gaul, was pillaged by their lawless bands; and the humble colony, which they so long maintained in the district of Toxandia, in Brabant, insensibly multiplied along the banks of the Meuse and Scheld, till their independent power filled the whole extent of the Second, or Lower Germany. These facts may be sufficiently justified by historic evidence; but the foundation of the French monarchy by Pharamond, the conquests, the laws, and even the existence, of that hero, have been justly arraigned by the impartial severity of modern criticism.
Such a victory could have fairly been claimed by Rome's ally if Wallia had eliminated the causes of the Spanish war before crossing back over the Pyrenees. His victorious Goths, forty-three years after crossing the Danube, were settled, as per treaties, in the second Aquitain; a coastal province between the Garonne and the Loire, under the civil and religious authority of Bourdeaux. That city, ideally located for ocean trade, was built in a neat and attractive style, and its many residents were recognized among the Gauls for their wealth, education, and refined manners. The nearby province, often likened to the garden of Eden, enjoyed rich soil and a mild climate; the landscape showcased the skills and rewards of hard work, and the Goths, after their military efforts, leisurely indulged in the bountiful vineyards of Aquitain. The Gothic territory expanded with the additional gift of some nearby dioceses, and Alaric's successors established their royal residence in Thoulouse, encompassing five bustling districts or cities within its expansive walls. Around the same time, during the final years of Honorius's reign, the Goths, Burgundians, and Franks gained a lasting presence and control in the provinces of Gaul. The generous grant from the usurper Jovinus to his Burgundian allies was endorsed by the legitimate emperor; the lands of First, or Upper, Germany were handed over to those fierce Barbarians, who gradually took over, through either conquest or agreements, the two provinces that still carry the titles of Duchy and County, bearing the name of Burgundy. The Franks, brave and loyal allies of the Roman republic, were soon tempted to mimic the invaders they had fought so valiantly against. Treves, the capital of Gaul, was raided by their unruly bands; and the small colony they had long maintained in Toxandia, in Brabant, gradually expanded along the banks of the Meuse and Scheld until their independent power spread throughout the entirety of Second, or Lower Germany. These events can be adequately supported by historical evidence; however, the establishment of the French monarchy by Pharamond, along with the conquests, laws, and even the existence of that hero, have been rightly challenged by the impartial scrutiny of modern criticism.
The ruin of the opulent provinces of Gaul may be dated from the establishment of these Barbarians, whose alliance was dangerous and oppressive, and who were capriciously impelled, by interest or passion, to violate the public peace. A heavy and partial ransom was imposed on the surviving provincials, who had escaped the calamities of war; the fairest and most fertile lands were assigned to the rapacious strangers, for the use of their families, their slaves, and their cattle; and the trembling natives relinquished with a sigh the inheritance of their fathers. Yet these domestic misfortunes, which are seldom the lot of a vanquished people, had been felt and inflicted by the Romans themselves, not only in the insolence of foreign conquest, but in the madness of civil discord. The Triumvirs proscribed eighteen of the most flourishing colonies of Italy; and distributed their lands and houses to the veterans who revenged the death of Cæsar, and oppressed the liberty of their country. Two poets of unequal fame have deplored, in similar circumstances, the loss of their patrimony; but the legionaries of Augustus appear to have surpassed, in violence and injustice, the Barbarians who invaded Gaul under the reign of Honorius. It was not without the utmost difficulty that Virgil escaped from the sword of the Centurion, who had usurped his farm in the neighborhood of Mantua; but Paulinus of Bourdeaux received a sum of money from his Gothic purchaser, which he accepted with pleasure and surprise; and though it was much inferior to the real value of his estate, this act of rapine was disguised by some colors of moderation and equity. The odious name of conquerors was softened into the mild and friendly appellation of the guests of the Romans; and the Barbarians of Gaul, more especially the Goths, repeatedly declared, that they were bound to the people by the ties of hospitality, and to the emperor by the duty of allegiance and military service. The title of Honorius and his successors, their laws, and their civil magistrates, were still respected in the provinces of Gaul, of which they had resigned the possession to the Barbarian allies; and the kings, who exercised a supreme and independent authority over their native subjects, ambitiously solicited the more honorable rank of master-generals of the Imperial armies. Such was the involuntary reverence which the Roman name still impressed on the minds of those warriors, who had borne away in triumph the spoils of the Capitol.
The downfall of the wealthy provinces of Gaul began with the arrival of these Barbarians, whose alliance was both dangerous and oppressive, and who acted unpredictably, driven by self-interest or emotion, to disrupt the public peace. A heavy and unfair ransom was imposed on the surviving locals who had survived the war’s devastation; the most beautiful and fertile lands were given to the greedy newcomers for the benefit of their families, slaves, and livestock, while the frightened natives reluctantly gave up their ancestral inheritance. Yet these domestic tragedies, which are rarely experienced by a defeated people, had been faced and inflicted by the Romans themselves, not only through the arrogance of foreign conquest but also during the chaos of civil strife. The Triumvirs targeted eighteen of the most prosperous colonies in Italy and redistributed their lands and homes to the veterans who avenged Julius Caesar's death and suppressed their nation’s freedom. Two poets of differing renown lamented, under similar circumstances, the loss of their heritage; however, the soldiers of Augustus seemed to have outdone the Barbarians who invaded Gaul during Honorius's reign in their brutality and injustice. Virgil barely escaped the sword of the centurion who had taken over his farm near Mantua, while Paulinus of Bordeaux received a payment from his Gothic buyer, which he accepted with both pleasure and surprise; even though it was far less than the real worth of his property, this act of plunder was masked with some semblance of moderation and fairness. The unpleasant label of conquerors was softened into the friendly term of guests of the Romans; and the Barbarians in Gaul, especially the Goths, repeatedly claimed that they were tied to the people through hospitality and owed allegiance and military service to the emperor. The title of Honorius and his successors, their laws, and their civil officials were still honored in the provinces of Gaul, which they had allowed the Barbarian allies to occupy; and the kings, who held supreme and independent power over their native people, eagerly sought the more prestigious position of master-generals of the Imperial armies. Such was the involuntary respect that the Roman name still commanded in the minds of those warriors, who had triumphantly carried away the spoils of the Capitol.
Whilst Italy was ravaged by the Goths, and a succession of feeble tyrants oppressed the provinces beyond the Alps, the British island separated itself from the body of the Roman empire. The regular forces, which guarded that remote province, had been gradually withdrawn; and Britain was abandoned without defence to the Saxon pirates, and the savages of Ireland and Caledonia. The Britons, reduced to this extremity, no longer relied on the tardy and doubtful aid of a declining monarchy. They assembled in arms, repelled the invaders, and rejoiced in the important discovery of their own strength. Afflicted by similar calamities, and actuated by the same spirit, the Armorican provinces (a name which comprehended the maritime countries of Gaul between the Seine and the Loire ) resolved to imitate the example of the neighboring island. They expelled the Roman magistrates, who acted under the authority of the usurper Constantine; and a free government was established among a people who had so long been subject to the arbitrary will of a master. The independence of Britain and Armorica was soon confirmed by Honorius himself, the lawful emperor of the West; and the letters, by which he committed to the new states the care of their own safety, might be interpreted as an absolute and perpetual abdication of the exercise and rights of sovereignty. This interpretation was, in some measure, justified by the event. After the usurpers of Gaul had successively fallen, the maritime provinces were restored to the empire. Yet their obedience was imperfect and precarious: the vain, inconstant, rebellious disposition of the people, was incompatible either with freedom or servitude; and Armorica, though it could not long maintain the form of a republic, was agitated by frequent and destructive revolts. Britain was irrecoverably lost. But as the emperors wisely acquiesced in the independence of a remote province, the separation was not imbittered by the reproach of tyranny or rebellion; and the claims of allegiance and protection were succeeded by the mutual and voluntary offices of national friendship.
While Italy was being devastated by the Goths, and a series of weak tyrants oppressed the provinces beyond the Alps, the British island detached itself from the Roman Empire. The regular troops that had protected that distant province had been gradually withdrawn; Britain was left defenseless against Saxon pirates and the tribes of Ireland and Caledonia. Unable to rely on the slow and uncertain help from a fading monarchy, the Britons took matters into their own hands, armed themselves, fought off the invaders, and took pride in discovering their own strength. The Armorican provinces, facing similar hardships and driven by the same spirit, decided to follow the example of the neighboring island. They expelled the Roman officials acting under the authority of the usurper Constantine and established a free government among a people who had long been subjected to the whims of a ruler. The independence of Britain and Armorica was quickly acknowledged by Honorius, the rightful emperor of the West; his letters, which entrusted the new states with their own safety, could be seen as a complete and permanent renouncement of sovereignty. This view was somewhat validated by subsequent events. After the usurpers in Gaul fell one after the other, the coastal provinces were restored to the empire. However, their loyalty was inconsistent and unstable: the fickle, rebellious nature of the people did not align with either freedom or servitude, and Armorica, while it could not maintain the structure of a republic for long, was frequently rocked by destructive revolts. Britain was irretrievably lost. But since the emperors wisely accepted the independence of this distant province, the separation wasn’t marred by accusations of tyranny or rebellion; instead, the claims of loyalty and protection were replaced by mutual and voluntary acts of national friendship.
This revolution dissolved the artificial fabric of civil and military government; and the independent country, during a period of forty years, till the descent of the Saxons, was ruled by the authority of the clergy, the nobles, and the municipal towns. I. Zosimus, who alone has preserved the memory of this singular transaction, very accurately observes, that the letters of Honorius were addressed to the cities of Britain. Under the protection of the Romans, ninety-two considerable towns had arisen in the several parts of that great province; and, among these, thirty-three cities were distinguished above the rest by their superior privileges and importance. Each of these cities, as in all the other provinces of the empire, formed a legal corporation, for the purpose of regulating their domestic policy; and the powers of municipal government were distributed among annual magistrates, a select senate, and the assembly of the people, according to the original model of the Roman constitution. The management of a common revenue, the exercise of civil and criminal jurisdiction, and the habits of public counsel and command, were inherent to these petty republics; and when they asserted their independence, the youth of the city, and of the adjacent districts, would naturally range themselves under the standard of the magistrate. But the desire of obtaining the advantages, and of escaping the burdens, of political society, is a perpetual and inexhaustible source of discord; nor can it reasonably be presumed, that the restoration of British freedom was exempt from tumult and faction. The preeminence of birth and fortune must have been frequently violated by bold and popular citizens; and the haughty nobles, who complained that they were become the subjects of their own servants, would sometimes regret the reign of an arbitrary monarch. II. The jurisdiction of each city over the adjacent country, was supported by the patrimonial influence of the principal senators; and the smaller towns, the villages, and the proprietors of land, consulted their own safety by adhering to the shelter of these rising republics. The sphere of their attraction was proportioned to the respective degrees of their wealth and populousness; but the hereditary lords of ample possessions, who were not oppressed by the neighborhood of any powerful city, aspired to the rank of independent princes, and boldly exercised the rights of peace and war. The gardens and villas, which exhibited some faint imitation of Italian elegance, would soon be converted into strong castles, the refuge, in time of danger, of the adjacent country: the produce of the land was applied to purchase arms and horses; to maintain a military force of slaves, of peasants, and of licentious followers; and the chieftain might assume, within his own domain, the powers of a civil magistrate. Several of these British chiefs might be the genuine posterity of ancient kings; and many more would be tempted to adopt this honorable genealogy, and to vindicate their hereditary claims, which had been suspended by the usurpation of the Cæsars. Their situation and their hopes would dispose them to affect the dress, the language, and the customs of their ancestors. If the princes of Britain relapsed into barbarism, while the cities studiously preserved the laws and manners of Rome, the whole island must have been gradually divided by the distinction of two national parties; again broken into a thousand subdivisions of war and faction, by the various provocations of interest and resentment. The public strength, instead of being united against a foreign enemy, was consumed in obscure and intestine quarrels; and the personal merit which had placed a successful leader at the head of his equals, might enable him to subdue the freedom of some neighboring cities; and to claim a rank among the tyrants, who infested Britain after the dissolution of the Roman government. III. The British church might be composed of thirty or forty bishops, with an adequate proportion of the inferior clergy; and the want of riches (for they seem to have been poor ) would compel them to deserve the public esteem, by a decent and exemplary behavior. The interest, as well as the temper of the clergy, was favorable to the peace and union of their distracted country: those salutary lessons might be frequently inculcated in their popular discourses; and the episcopal synods were the only councils that could pretend to the weight and authority of a national assembly. In such councils, where the princes and magistrates sat promiscuously with the bishops, the important affairs of the state, as well as of the church, might be freely debated; differences reconciled, alliances formed, contributions imposed, wise resolutions often concerted, and sometimes executed; and there is reason to believe, that, in moments of extreme danger, a Pendragon, or Dictator, was elected by the general consent of the Britons. These pastoral cares, so worthy of the episcopal character, were interrupted, however, by zeal and superstition; and the British clergy incessantly labored to eradicate the Pelagian heresy, which they abhorred, as the peculiar disgrace of their native country.
This revolution shattered the artificial structure of civil and military government, and for the next forty years, until the arrival of the Saxons, the independent country was governed by the clergy, the nobles, and the municipal towns. I. Zosimus, who is the only one to remember this unique event, notes that the letters of Honorius were sent to the cities of Britain. Under Roman protection, ninety-two significant towns had emerged in different parts of that vast province; among these, thirty-three cities stood out due to their greater privileges and importance. Each city, like in all other provinces of the empire, formed a legal corporation to manage its domestic affairs; municipal powers were shared among elected magistrates, a select senate, and a popular assembly, following the original Roman model. These small republics managed a shared revenue, handled civil and criminal jurisdiction, and engaged in public discussion and command. When they claimed their independence, the youth from the city and surrounding areas would naturally rally around the magistrate's banner. However, the desire to gain the benefits while avoiding the burdens of political life is a constant source of conflict; it’s unlikely that the reestablishment of British freedom was free from turmoil and factions. The status derived from birth and wealth was often challenged by bold and popular citizens, and the proud nobles, who felt reduced to the status of their own servants, sometimes longed for the rule of an absolute monarch. II. Each city’s authority over the surrounding countryside was upheld by the influence of leading senators, and smaller towns, villages, and landowners sought safety by aligning themselves with these emerging republics. Their influence extended according to their wealth and population; yet, landowners with significant holdings, who weren’t affected by any major nearby city, aimed to rise as independent princes and boldly exercised their rights of peace and war. The gardens and villas that showed some hints of Italian style quickly turned into fortified castles, providing refuge in times of danger for the surrounding countryside. The land’s produce was used to buy weapons and horses, to maintain a military force of slaves, peasants, and unruly followers; and chiefs could assert civil magistrate powers within their own territory. Many of these British chiefs could have been direct descendants of ancient kings; others might have been encouraged to adopt this noble lineage and reclaim their hereditary rights that were interrupted by the rule of the Caesars. Their circumstances and aspirations would lead them to embrace the dress, language, and customs of their ancestors. If the princes of Britain fell back into barbarism while the cities diligently preserved the laws and customs of Rome, the entire island would likely have gradually split into two national factions, further fragmented into countless subdivisions of war and conflict, driven by various interests and grievances. Public strength, instead of uniting against a foreign enemy, was wasted in obscure internal disputes; and the personal merit that put a successful leader at the forefront of his peers might allow him to dominate neighboring cities, thereby claiming a status among the tyrants who plagued Britain after the fall of Roman authority. III. The British church was likely made up of about thirty or forty bishops, along with a suitable number of lower clergy; their apparent lack of wealth (as they seemed to be poor) compelled them to earn public respect through decent and exemplary conduct. Both the interests and the mindset of the clergy favored peace and unity in their troubled country: these beneficial principles were often emphasized in their public speeches; and the episcopal synods became the only gatherings that could act with the authority of a national assembly. In these councils, where princes and magistrates mingled with bishops, significant issues related to state and church could be openly discussed; differences reconciled, alliances formed, contributions imposed, wise decisions often made, and sometimes carried out; and there are grounds to believe that in times of great danger, a Pendragon or Dictator was chosen by the collective agreement of the Britons. However, these pastoral duties, deserving of the episcopal role, were constantly interrupted by zeal and superstition; and the British clergy tirelessly worked to eliminate the Pelagian heresy, which they detested as a unique shame of their homeland.
It is somewhat remarkable, or rather it is extremely natural, that the revolt of Britain and Armorica should have introduced an appearance of liberty into the obedient provinces of Gaul. In a solemn edict, filled with the strongest assurances of that paternal affection which princes so often express, and so seldom feel, the emperor Honorius promulgated his intention of convening an annual assembly of the seven provinces: a name peculiarly appropriated to Aquitain and the ancient Narbonnese, which had long since exchanged their Celtic rudeness for the useful and elegant arts of Italy. Arles, the seat of government and commerce, was appointed for the place of the assembly; which regularly continued twenty-eight days, from the fifteenth of August to the thirteenth of September, of every year. It consisted of the Prætorian præfect of the Gauls; of seven provincial governors, one consular, and six presidents; of the magistrates, and perhaps the bishops, of about sixty cities; and of a competent, though indefinite, number of the most honorable and opulent possessors of land, who might justly be considered as the representatives of their country. They were empowered to interpret and communicate the laws of their sovereign; to expose the grievances and wishes of their constituents; to moderate the excessive or unequal weight of taxes; and to deliberate on every subject of local or national importance, that could tend to the restoration of the peace and prosperity of the seven provinces. If such an institution, which gave the people an interest in their own government, had been universally established by Trajan or the Antonines, the seeds of public wisdom and virtue might have been cherished and propagated in the empire of Rome. The privileges of the subject would have secured the throne of the monarch; the abuses of an arbitrary administration might have been prevented, in some degree, or corrected, by the interposition of these representative assemblies; and the country would have been defended against a foreign enemy by the arms of natives and freemen. Under the mild and generous influence of liberty, the Roman empire might have remained invincible and immortal; or if its excessive magnitude, and the instability of human affairs, had opposed such perpetual continuance, its vital and constituent members might have separately preserved their vigor and independence. But in the decline of the empire, when every principle of health and life had been exhausted, the tardy application of this partial remedy was incapable of producing any important or salutary effects. The emperor Honorius expresses his surprise, that he must compel the reluctant provinces to accept a privilege which they should ardently have solicited. A fine of three, or even five, pounds of gold, was imposed on the absent representatives; who seem to have declined this imaginary gift of a free constitution, as the last and most cruel insult of their oppressors.
It's somewhat remarkable, or rather it’s completely natural, that the uprising in Britain and Armorica brought an illusion of freedom to the obedient provinces of Gaul. In a formal decree, filled with the strongest claims of the kind of fatherly love that rulers often express but rarely feel, Emperor Honorius announced his plan to hold an annual assembly of the seven provinces: a term specifically used for Aquitain and the old Narbonnese, which had long traded their Celtic roughness for the useful and refined arts of Italy. Arles, the center of government and trade, was chosen as the location for the assembly, which would regularly last twenty-eight days, from August 15th to September 13th, every year. It included the Prætorian prefect of the Gauls; seven provincial governors, one consular and six presidents; the magistrates, and likely the bishops, of around sixty cities; and a sufficient, though unspecified, number of the most respected and wealthy landowners, who could be rightly viewed as representatives of their communities. They were given the authority to interpret and communicate the laws of their ruler, to address the grievances and desires of their constituents, to moderate the burden of taxes, and to deliberate on any issues of local or national significance that could contribute to restoring peace and prosperity to the seven provinces. If such an institution, which engaged the people in their own governance, had been widely established by Trajan or the Antonines, the seeds of public wisdom and virtue might have thrived and spread throughout the Roman Empire. The rights of the citizens would have secured the king’s throne; the abuses of arbitrary governance might have been somewhat prevented or corrected through the involvement of these representative assemblies; and the nation would have been defended against foreign threats by the forces of locals and free men. Under the gentle and generous influence of liberty, the Roman Empire could have remained invincible and eternal; or if its vastness and the instability of human affairs had hindered such an eternal existence, its vital and core components might have separately maintained their strength and independence. But during the decline of the empire, when every principle of health and life had been exhausted, the slow implementation of this partial remedy was incapable of producing any significant or beneficial outcomes. Emperor Honorius expresses his surprise at having to force the unwilling provinces to accept a privilege they should have eagerly sought. A fine of three or even five pounds of gold was imposed on the absent representatives, who seemed to reject this illusory gift of a free constitution as the final and most brutal insult from their oppressors.
Chapter XXXII: Emperors Arcadius, Eutropius, Theodosius II.—Part I.
Arcadius Emperor Of The East.—Administration And Disgrace Of Eutropius.—Revolt Of Gainas.—Persecution Of St. John Chrysostom.—Theodosius II. Emperor Of The East.—His Sister Pulcheria.—His Wife Eudocia.—The Persian War, And Division Of Armenia.
Arcadius, Emperor of the East. — Administration and Disgrace of Eutropius. — Revolt of Gainas. — Persecution of St. John Chrysostom. — Theodosius II, Emperor of the East. — His Sister Pulcheria. — His Wife Eudocia. — The Persian War and Division of Armenia.
The division of the Roman world between the sons of Theodosius marks the final establishment of the empire of the East, which, from the reign of Arcadius to the taking of Constantinople by the Turks, subsisted one thousand and fifty-eight years, in a state of premature and perpetual decay. The sovereign of that empire assumed, and obstinately retained, the vain, and at length fictitious, title of Emperor of the Romans; and the hereditary appellation of Cæsar and Augustus continued to declare, that he was the legitimate successor of the first of men, who had reigned over the first of nations. The place of Constantinople rivalled, and perhaps excelled, the magnificence of Persia; and the eloquent sermons of St. Chrysostom celebrate, while they condemn, the pompous luxury of the reign of Arcadius. "The emperor," says he, "wears on his head either a diadem, or a crown of gold, decorated with precious stones of inestimable value. These ornaments, and his purple garments, are reserved for his sacred person alone; and his robes of silk are embroidered with the figures of golden dragons. His throne is of massy gold. Whenever he appears in public, he is surrounded by his courtiers, his guards, and his attendants. Their spears, their shields, their cuirasses, the bridles and trappings of their horses, have either the substance or the appearance of gold; and the large splendid boss in the midst of their shield is encircled with smaller bosses, which represent the shape of the human eye. The two mules that drew the chariot of the monarch are perfectly white, and shining all over with gold. The chariot itself, of pure and solid gold, attracts the admiration of the spectators, who contemplate the purple curtains, the snowy carpet, the size of the precious stones, and the resplendent plates of gold, that glitter as they are agitated by the motion of the carriage. The Imperial pictures are white, on a blue ground; the emperor appears seated on his throne, with his arms, his horses, and his guards beside him; and his vanquished enemies in chains at his feet." The successors of Constantine established their perpetual residence in the royal city, which he had erected on the verge of Europe and Asia. Inaccessible to the menaces of their enemies, and perhaps to the complaints of their people, they received, with each wind, the tributary productions of every climate; while the impregnable strength of their capital continued for ages to defy the hostile attempts of the Barbarians. Their dominions were bounded by the Adriatic and the Tigris; and the whole interval of twenty-five days' navigation, which separated the extreme cold of Scythia from the torrid zone of Æthiopia, was comprehended within the limits of the empire of the East. The populous countries of that empire were the seat of art and learning, of luxury and wealth; and the inhabitants, who had assumed the language and manners of Greeks, styled themselves, with some appearance of truth, the most enlightened and civilized portion of the human species. The form of government was a pure and simple monarchy; the name of the Roman Republic, which so long preserved a faint tradition of freedom, was confined to the Latin provinces; and the princes of Constantinople measured their greatness by the servile obedience of their people. They were ignorant how much this passive disposition enervates and degrades every faculty of the mind. The subjects, who had resigned their will to the absolute commands of a master, were equally incapable of guarding their lives and fortunes against the assaults of the Barbarians, or of defending their reason from the terrors of superstition.
The division of the Roman world between the sons of Theodosius marks the final establishment of the Eastern Empire, which existed for one thousand and fifty-eight years from the reign of Arcadius to the fall of Constantinople to the Turks, in a state of early and ongoing decline. The ruler of that empire took on, and stubbornly kept, the empty and eventually false title of Emperor of the Romans; the hereditary titles of Cæsar and Augustus continued to signal that he was the legitimate successor of the first man who ruled over the greatest of nations. Constantinople rivaled, and perhaps surpassed, the splendor of Persia; and the eloquent sermons of St. Chrysostom both praise and criticize the extravagant luxury of Arcadius's reign. "The emperor," he says, "wears either a diadem or a gold crown adorned with priceless gems. These decorations, along with his purple garments, are reserved solely for his sacred person; his silk robes are embroidered with images of golden dragons. His throne is made of solid gold. Whenever he appears in public, he is surrounded by his court, guards, and attendants. Their spears, shields, armor, bridles, and horse decorations are either made of gold or have the appearance of it, and the large, magnificent boss in the center of their shields is surrounded by smaller ones shaped like human eyes. The two mules pulling the emperor's chariot are pure white and covered in gold. The chariot itself, made entirely of solid gold, draws the admiration of onlookers, who marvel at the purple curtains, the pristine carpet, the size of the precious stones, and the shiny gold plates that sparkle as they move. The Imperial images are white against a blue background; the emperor appears seated on his throne, flanked by his arms, horses, and guards, with his defeated enemies in chains at his feet." The successors of Constantine established their permanent residence in the royal city that he built on the edge of Europe and Asia. Safe from the threats of their foes, and perhaps from the complaints of their people, they received, with every wind, tribute from every part of the world; while the strong defenses of their capital continued for centuries to withstand the attacks of the Barbarians. Their territories stretched from the Adriatic to the Tigris; and the entire stretch of twenty-five days' navigation, which separated the frigid cold of Scythia from the scorching zone of Ethiopia, fell within the boundaries of the Eastern Empire. The populous regions of that empire were the center of art and learning, luxury, and wealth; and the inhabitants, who had adopted the language and customs of the Greeks, claimed, with some justification, to be the most enlightened and civilized part of humanity. The form of government was a straightforward monarchy; the name of the Roman Republic, which had once maintained a faint tradition of freedom, was limited to the Latin provinces; and the rulers of Constantinople measured their greatness by the subservient obedience of their subjects. They were unaware of how much this passive attitude weakens and diminishes every mental ability. The subjects, who had given up their will to the absolute demands of a master, were equally unable to defend their lives and property against the attacks of the Barbarians or to protect their reason from the fears of superstition.
The first events of the reign of Arcadius and Honorius are so intimately connected, that the rebellion of the Goths, and the fall of Rufinus, have already claimed a place in the history of the West. It has already been observed, that Eutropius, one of the principal eunuchs of the palace of Constantinople, succeeded the haughty minister whose ruin he had accomplished, and whose vices he soon imitated. Every order of the state bowed to the new favorite; and their tame and obsequious submission encouraged him to insult the laws, and, what is still more difficult and dangerous, the manners of his country. Under the weakest of the predecessors of Arcadius, the reign of the eunuchs had been secret and almost invisible. They insinuated themselves into the confidence of the prince; but their ostensible functions were confined to the menial service of the wardrobe and Imperial bed-chamber. They might direct, in a whisper, the public counsels, and blast, by their malicious suggestions, the fame and fortunes of the most illustrious citizens; but they never presumed to stand forward in the front of empire, or to profane the public honors of the state. Eutropius was the first of his artificial sex, who dared to assume the character of a Roman magistrate and general. Sometimes, in the presence of the blushing senate, he ascended the tribunal to pronounce judgment, or to repeat elaborate harangues; and, sometimes, appeared on horseback, at the head of his troops, in the dress and armor of a hero. The disregard of custom and decency always betrays a weak and ill-regulated mind; nor does Eutropius seem to have compensated for the folly of the design by any superior merit or ability in the execution. His former habits of life had not introduced him to the study of the laws, or the exercises of the field; his awkward and unsuccessful attempts provoked the secret contempt of the spectators; the Goths expressed their wish that such a general might always command the armies of Rome; and the name of the minister was branded with ridicule, more pernicious, perhaps, than hatred, to a public character. The subjects of Arcadius were exasperated by the recollection, that this deformed and decrepit eunuch, who so perversely mimicked the actions of a man, was born in the most abject condition of servitude; that before he entered the Imperial palace, he had been successively sold and purchased by a hundred masters, who had exhausted his youthful strength in every mean and infamous office, and at length dismissed him, in his old age, to freedom and poverty. While these disgraceful stories were circulated, and perhaps exaggerated, in private conversation, the vanity of the favorite was flattered with the most extraordinary honors. In the senate, in the capital, in the provinces, the statues of Eutropius were erected, in brass, or marble, decorated with the symbols of his civil and military virtues, and inscribed with the pompous title of the third founder of Constantinople. He was promoted to the rank of patrician, which began to signify in a popular, and even legal, acceptation, the father of the emperor; and the last year of the fourth century was polluted by the consulship of a eunuch and a slave. This strange and inexpiable prodigy awakened, however, the prejudices of the Romans. The effeminate consul was rejected by the West, as an indelible stain to the annals of the republic; and without invoking the shades of Brutus and Camillus, the colleague of Eutropius, a learned and respectable magistrate, sufficiently represented the different maxims of the two administrations.
The early events of the reign of Arcadius and Honorius are closely linked, as the Goths' rebellion and Rufinus's downfall have already made their mark on Western history. It's been noted that Eutropius, one of the top eunuchs in the Constantinople palace, took over from the arrogant minister he had helped to bring down, soon mirroring his flaws. Every branch of the government submitted to the new favorite, and their submissive behavior encouraged him to flout laws and, more alarmingly, the customs of his country. Under the weakest predecessors of Arcadius, the eunuchs had operated in secrecy and nearly invisibility. They earned the prince's trust but were limited to menial roles in the wardrobe and the Imperial bedroom. They could subtly steer public discussions and ruin the reputations and fortunes of the most prominent citizens through malicious whispers, yet they never dared to step into the open as authoritative figures or tamper with the state's public honors. Eutropius was the first of his kind to boldly take on the role of a Roman magistrate and general. He would sometimes rise to the tribunal in front of the embarrassed senate to pass judgment or deliver elaborate speeches, and at other times, he would ride at the head of his troops dressed as a hero. Ignoring tradition and decency shows a weak and poorly organized mind, and Eutropius didn't seem to make up for the foolishness of his ambition with any real skill or capability. His previous way of life hadn't led him to study law or military training; his clumsy, ineffective attempts drew secret mockery from those who watched; the Goths expressed their desire for such a general to always lead Rome’s armies; and the minister's name became a target of ridicule, which could be more damaging than outright hatred for someone in public office. The people under Arcadius were angered by the fact that this misshapen and aging eunuch, who foolishly imitated a man’s actions, was born into the most wretched servitude—having been sold and bought by countless masters, exhausting his youth in all sorts of degrading roles, only to be set free in his old age to face poverty. While these embarrassing tales spread, possibly becoming exaggerated in private conversations, Eutropius's vanity was fed with extraordinary honors. Statues of Eutropius were erected in brass and marble throughout the senate, the capital, and the provinces, adorned with symbols of his civil and military accomplishments, and inscribed with the grand title of the third founder of Constantinople. He was promoted to the rank of patrician, which was beginning to mean, in a popular and even legal sense, the father of the emperor; and the last year of the fourth century was tainted by the consulship of a eunuch and a slave. However, this bizarre and unforgivable spectacle stirred up the prejudices of the Romans. The effeminate consul was rejected by the West as a permanent stain on the republic's history; and without calling upon the spirits of Brutus and Camillus, Eutropius's colleague—a learned and respected magistrate—sufficiently represented the contrasting principles of the two administrations.
The bold and vigorous mind of Rufinus seems to have been actuated by a more sanguinary and revengeful spirit; but the avarice of the eunuch was not less insatiate than that of the præfect. As long as he despoiled the oppressors, who had enriched themselves with the plunder of the people, Eutropius might gratify his covetous disposition without much envy or injustice: but the progress of his rapine soon invaded the wealth which had been acquired by lawful inheritance, or laudable industry. The usual methods of extortion were practised and improved; and Claudian has sketched a lively and original picture of the public auction of the state. "The impotence of the eunuch," says that agreeable satirist, "has served only to stimulate his avarice: the same hand which in his servile condition, was exercised in petty thefts, to unlock the coffers of his master, now grasps the riches of the world; and this infamous broker of the empire appreciates and divides the Roman provinces from Mount Hæmus to the Tigris. One man, at the expense of his villa, is made proconsul of Asia; a second purchases Syria with his wife's jewels; and a third laments that he has exchanged his paternal estate for the government of Bithynia. In the antechamber of Eutropius, a large tablet is exposed to public view, which marks the respective prices of the provinces. The different value of Pontus, of Galatia, of Lydia, is accurately distinguished. Lycia may be obtained for so many thousand pieces of gold; but the opulence of Phrygia will require a more considerable sum. The eunuch wishes to obliterate, by the general disgrace, his personal ignominy; and as he has been sold himself, he is desirous of selling the rest of mankind. In the eager contention, the balance, which contains the fate and fortunes of the province, often trembles on the beam; and till one of the scales is inclined, by a superior weight, the mind of the impartial judge remains in anxious suspense. Such," continues the indignant poet, "are the fruits of Roman valor, of the defeat of Antiochus, and of the triumph of Pompey." This venal prostitution of public honors secured the impunity of future crimes; but the riches, which Eutropius derived from confiscation, were already stained with injustice; since it was decent to accuse, and to condemn, the proprietors of the wealth, which he was impatient to confiscate. Some noble blood was shed by the hand of the executioner; and the most inhospitable extremities of the empire were filled with innocent and illustrious exiles. Among the generals and consuls of the East, Abundantius had reason to dread the first effects of the resentment of Eutropius. He had been guilty of the unpardonable crime of introducing that abject slave to the palace of Constantinople; and some degree of praise must be allowed to a powerful and ungrateful favorite, who was satisfied with the disgrace of his benefactor. Abundantius was stripped of his ample fortunes by an Imperial rescript, and banished to Pityus, on the Euxine, the last frontier of the Roman world; where he subsisted by the precarious mercy of the Barbarians, till he could obtain, after the fall of Eutropius, a milder exile at Sidon, in Phnicia. The destruction of Timasius required a more serious and regular mode of attack. That great officer, the master-general of the armies of Theodosius, had signalized his valor by a decisive victory, which he obtained over the Goths of Thessaly; but he was too prone, after the example of his sovereign, to enjoy the luxury of peace, and to abandon his confidence to wicked and designing flatterers. Timasius had despised the public clamor, by promoting an infamous dependent to the command of a cohort; and he deserved to feel the ingratitude of Bargus, who was secretly instigated by the favorite to accuse his patron of a treasonable conspiracy. The general was arraigned before the tribunal of Arcadius himself; and the principal eunuch stood by the side of the throne to suggest the questions and answers of his sovereign. But as this form of trial might be deemed partial and arbitrary, the further inquiry into the crimes of Timasius was delegated to Saturninus and Procopius; the former of consular rank, the latter still respected as the father-in-law of the emperor Valens. The appearances of a fair and legal proceeding were maintained by the blunt honesty of Procopius; and he yielded with reluctance to the obsequious dexterity of his colleague, who pronounced a sentence of condemnation against the unfortunate Timasius. His immense riches were confiscated in the name of the emperor, and for the benefit of the favorite; and he was doomed to perpetual exile at Oasis, a solitary spot in the midst of the sandy deserts of Libya. Secluded from all human converse, the master-general of the Roman armies was lost forever to the world; but the circumstances of his fate have been related in a various and contradictory manner. It is insinuated that Eutropius despatched a private order for his secret execution. It was reported, that, in attempting to escape from Oasis, he perished in the desert, of thirst and hunger; and that his dead body was found on the sands of Libya. It has been asserted, with more confidence, that his son Syagrius, after successfully eluding the pursuit of the agents and emissaries of the court, collected a band of African robbers; that he rescued Timasius from the place of his exile; and that both the father and the son disappeared from the knowledge of mankind. But the ungrateful Bargus, instead of being suffered to possess the reward of guilt was soon after circumvented and destroyed, by the more powerful villany of the minister himself, who retained sense and spirit enough to abhor the instrument of his own crimes.
The bold and energetic mind of Rufinus seems to have been driven by a more bloodthirsty and vengeful spirit; yet the greed of the eunuch was just as insatiable as that of the prefect. As long as he was robbing the oppressors who had enriched themselves by plundering the people, Eutropius could satisfy his greedy nature without too much resentment or injustice: but soon his thefts began to target the wealth obtained through legal inheritance or honest hard work. The usual methods of extortion were practiced and refined; and Claudian vividly depicted the public auction of the state. "The impotence of the eunuch," the witty satirist says, "only fueled his greed: the same hand that, in his servile position, was involved in petty thefts to unlock his master's coffers now grasps the wealth of the world; and this infamous broker of the empire assesses and divides the Roman provinces from Mount Hæmus to the Tigris. One man, at the cost of his villa, is made proconsul of Asia; another buys Syria with his wife's jewels; and a third regrets that he traded his ancestral estate for the governorship of Bithynia. In Eutropius's antechamber, a large board displays the public prices for the provinces. The different values of Pontus, Galatia, and Lydia are clearly defined. Lycia can be had for a specific number of gold pieces; but the wealth of Phrygia will require a more substantial sum. The eunuch wants to erase his personal shame by spreading general disgrace, and since he was sold himself, he is eager to sell the rest of humanity. In this fierce competition, the scales, which hold the fates of the provinces, often wobble on the beam; and until one side tilts with greater weight, the mind of the impartial judge remains anxiously poised. Such," the outraged poet continues, "are the fruits of Roman bravery, of the defeat of Antiochus, and of Pompey's triumph." This sale of public honors ensured the impunity of future crimes; but the wealth that Eutropius gained from confiscation was already tainted with injustice, as it was appropriate to accuse and condemn the owners of the wealth he was impatient to seize. Some noble blood was shed by the executioner's hand; and the most inhospitable corners of the empire were filled with innocent and prominent exiles. Among the generals and consuls in the East, Abundantius had good reason to fear the initial consequences of Eutropius's anger. He had committed the unforgivable crime of introducing that lowly slave to the palace of Constantinople; and some credit must be given to a powerful and ungrateful favorite who was satisfied with bringing disgrace upon his benefactor. Abundantius was stripped of his great wealth by an imperial decree and exiled to Pityus on the Euxine, the farthest edge of the Roman world; where he lived at the mercy of the Barbarians until he could secure a gentler exile in Sidon, Phoenicia, after Eutropius's fall. The downfall of Timasius required a more serious and organized approach. That great officer, the master-general of Theodosius’s armies, had distinguished himself with a decisive victory over the Goths of Thessaly; but he was too eager, like his ruler, to enjoy the luxury of peace, allowing himself to be swayed by wicked and scheming flatterers. Timasius had disregarded public outcry by promoting a scandalous underling to command a cohort; and he deserved to feel the betrayal from Bargus, who was secretly incited by the favorite to accuse his patron of treason. The general was brought before the tribunal of Arcadius himself; and the main eunuch stood beside the throne to guide the questions and answers of his sovereign. But since this form of trial could seem biased and arbitrary, further investigation into Timasius's crimes was given to Saturninus and Procopius; the former of consular rank, the latter still honored as the father-in-law of Emperor Valens. The appearance of a fair and legal process was maintained by Procopius's straightforward honesty; and he reluctantly yielded to the smooth manipulations of his colleague, who declared a verdict of guilt against the unfortunate Timasius. His vast riches were confiscated in the emperor's name, for the benefit of the favorite; and he was sentenced to perpetual exile in Oasis, a lonely spot amidst the sandy deserts of Libya. Cut off from all human contact, the master-general of the Roman armies was lost to the world forever; but the details of his fate have been recounted in various and conflicting ways. It is suggested that Eutropius sent a private order for his secret execution. It was said that while trying to escape from Oasis, he died in the desert from thirst and hunger, his body found on the sands of Libya. It has been claimed, with more certainty, that his son Syagrius, after skillfully avoiding the court's agents, gathered a band of African robbers; that he rescued Timasius from exile; and that both father and son vanished from public knowledge. But the ungrateful Bargus, instead of enjoying the rewards of his wrongdoing, was soon outmaneuvered and destroyed by the more powerful treachery of the minister himself, who had enough sense and spirit to despise the tool of his own crimes.
The public hatred, and the despair of individuals, continually threatened, or seemed to threaten, the personal safety of Eutropius; as well as of the numerous adherents, who were attached to his fortune, and had been promoted by his venal favor. For their mutual defence, he contrived the safeguard of a law, which violated every principal of humanity and justice. I. It is enacted, in the name, and by the authority of Arcadius, that all those who should conspire, either with subjects or with strangers, against the lives of any of the persons whom the emperor considers as the members of his own body, shall be punished with death and confiscation. This species of fictitious and metaphorical treason is extended to protect, not only the illustrious officers of the state and army, who were admitted into the sacred consistory, but likewise the principal domestics of the palace, the senators of Constantinople, the military commanders, and the civil magistrates of the provinces; a vague and indefinite list, which, under the successors of Constantine, included an obscure and numerous train of subordinate ministers. II. This extreme severity might perhaps be justified, had it been only directed to secure the representatives of the sovereign from any actual violence in the execution of their office. But the whole body of Imperial dependants claimed a privilege, or rather impunity, which screened them, in the loosest moments of their lives, from the hasty, perhaps the justifiable, resentment of their fellow-citizens; and, by a strange perversion of the laws, the same degree of guilt and punishment was applied to a private quarrel, and to a deliberate conspiracy against the emperor and the empire. The edicts of Arcadius most positively and most absurdly declares, that in such cases of treason, thoughts and actions ought to be punished with equal severity; that the knowledge of a mischievous intention, unless it be instantly revealed, becomes equally criminal with the intention itself; and that those rash men, who shall presume to solicit the pardon of traitors, shall themselves be branded with public and perpetual infamy. III. "With regard to the sons of the traitors," (continues the emperor,) "although they ought to share the punishment, since they will probably imitate the guilt, of their parents, yet, by the special effect of our Imperial lenity, we grant them their lives; but, at the same time, we declare them incapable of inheriting, either on the father's or on the mother's side, or of receiving any gift or legacy, from the testament either of kinsmen or of strangers. Stigmatized with hereditary infamy, excluded from the hopes of honors or fortune, let them endure the pangs of poverty and contempt, till they shall consider life as a calamity, and death as a comfort and relief." In such words, so well adapted to insult the feelings of mankind, did the emperor, or rather his favorite eunuch, applaud the moderation of a law, which transferred the same unjust and inhuman penalties to the children of all those who had seconded, or who had not disclosed, their fictitious conspiracies. Some of the noblest regulations of Roman jurisprudence have been suffered to expire; but this edict, a convenient and forcible engine of ministerial tyranny, was carefully inserted in the codes of Theodosius and Justinian; and the same maxims have been revived in modern ages, to protect the electors of Germany, and the cardinals of the church of Rome.
The public's hatred and individuals' despair constantly threatened, or seemed to threaten, the personal safety of Eutropius and his many supporters, who had benefitted from his corrupt favoritism. To protect themselves, he created a law that violated every principle of humanity and justice. I. In the name and by the authority of Arcadius, it is enacted that anyone who conspires, either with citizens or outsiders, against the lives of anyone the emperor considers part of his own circle, shall be punished with death and confiscation. This kind of made-up and metaphorical treason not only protects the illustrious officers of the state and army who were admitted to the sacred council but also the main servants of the palace, the senators of Constantinople, the military leaders, and civil officials in the provinces; a vague and undefined list that, under Constantine's successors, included many obscure subordinate officials. II. This extreme severity might be justified if it were solely aimed at protecting the emperor's representatives from actual violence while they were doing their jobs. However, the entire body of Imperial dependents claimed a privilege, or rather immunity, that shielded them in their most reckless moments from the quick, possibly justified, anger of their fellow citizens; and, in a strange misinterpretation of the laws, the same level of guilt and punishment was applied to a private dispute and a calculated conspiracy against the emperor and the empire. Arcadius's edicts absurdly declare that in cases of treason, thoughts and actions should be punished with equal severity; that knowing of a harmful intention, unless immediately reported, is just as criminal as the intention itself; and that those foolish enough to ask for the forgiveness of traitors will be marked with public and permanent disgrace. III. "Regarding the sons of traitors," (the emperor continues), "even though they should share the punishment since they are likely to repeat their parents' wrongdoing, by the special act of our imperial mercy, we spare their lives; but we also declare them incapable of inheriting from either the father or the mother, or receiving any gift or inheritance from relatives or strangers. Stigmatized with hereditary disgrace, barred from hopes of honors or wealth, they shall suffer the pains of poverty and contempt until they see life as a burden and death as a comfort and relief." In such words, crafted to insult the feelings of people, did the emperor, or rather his favorite eunuch, praise the moderation of a law that imposed the same unjust and inhuman penalties on the children of anyone who had supported or failed to expose their fabricated conspiracies. Some of the greatest laws of Roman jurisprudence have been allowed to fade away; but this edict, a useful and powerful tool of ministerial tyranny, was carefully included in the codes of Theodosius and Justinian; and the same principles have been revived in modern times to protect the electors of Germany and the cardinals of the Church of Rome.
Yet these sanguinary laws, which spread terror among a disarmed and dispirited people, were of too weak a texture to restrain the bold enterprise of Tribigild the Ostrogoth. The colony of that warlike nation, which had been planted by Theodosius in one of the most fertile districts of Phrygia, impatiently compared the slow returns of laborious husbandry with the successful rapine and liberal rewards of Alaric; and their leader resented, as a personal affront, his own ungracious reception in the palace of Constantinople. A soft and wealthy province, in the heart of the empire, was astonished by the sound of war; and the faithful vassal who had been disregarded or oppressed, was again respected, as soon as he resumed the hostile character of a Barbarian. The vineyards and fruitful fields, between the rapid Marsyas and the winding Mæander, were consumed with fire; the decayed walls of the cities crumbled into dust, at the first stroke of an enemy; the trembling inhabitants escaped from a bloody massacre to the shores of the Hellespont; and a considerable part of Asia Minor was desolated by the rebellion of Tribigild. His rapid progress was checked by the resistance of the peasants of Pamphylia; and the Ostrogoths, attacked in a narrow pass, between the city of Selgæ, a deep morass, and the craggy cliffs of Mount Taurus, were defeated with the loss of their bravest troops. But the spirit of their chief was not daunted by misfortune; and his army was continually recruited by swarms of Barbarians and outlaws, who were desirous of exercising the profession of robbery, under the more honorable names of war and conquest. The rumors of the success of Tribigild might for some time be suppressed by fear, or disguised by flattery; yet they gradually alarmed both the court and the capital. Every misfortune was exaggerated in dark and doubtful hints; and the future designs of the rebels became the subject of anxious conjecture. Whenever Tribigild advanced into the inland country, the Romans were inclined to suppose that he meditated the passage of Mount Taurus, and the invasion of Syria. If he descended towards the sea, they imputed, and perhaps suggested, to the Gothic chief, the more dangerous project of arming a fleet in the harbors of Ionia, and of extending his depredations along the maritime coast, from the mouth of the Nile to the port of Constantinople. The approach of danger, and the obstinacy of Tribigild, who refused all terms of accommodation, compelled Eutropius to summon a council of war. After claiming for himself the privilege of a veteran soldier, the eunuch intrusted the guard of Thrace and the Hellespont to Gainas the Goth, and the command of the Asiatic army to his favorite, Leo; two generals, who differently, but effectually, promoted the cause of the rebels. Leo, who, from the bulk of his body, and the dulness of his mind, was surnamed the Ajax of the East, had deserted his original trade of a woolcomber, to exercise, with much less skill and success, the military profession; and his uncertain operations were capriciously framed and executed, with an ignorance of real difficulties, and a timorous neglect of every favorable opportunity. The rashness of the Ostrogoths had drawn them into a disadvantageous position between the Rivers Melas and Eurymedon, where they were almost besieged by the peasants of Pamphylia; but the arrival of an Imperial army, instead of completing their destruction, afforded the means of safety and victory. Tribigild surprised the unguarded camp of the Romans, in the darkness of the night; seduced the faith of the greater part of the Barbarian auxiliaries, and dissipated, without much effort, the troops, which had been corrupted by the relaxation of discipline, and the luxury of the capital. The discontent of Gainas, who had so boldly contrived and executed the death of Rufinus, was irritated by the fortune of his unworthy successor; he accused his own dishonorable patience under the servile reign of a eunuch; and the ambitious Goth was convicted, at least in the public opinion, of secretly fomenting the revolt of Tribigild, with whom he was connected by a domestic, as well as by a national alliance. When Gainas passed the Hellespont, to unite under his standard the remains of the Asiatic troops, he skilfully adapted his motions to the wishes of the Ostrogoths; abandoning, by his retreat, the country which they desired to invade; or facilitating, by his approach, the desertion of the Barbarian auxiliaries. To the Imperial court he repeatedly magnified the valor, the genius, the inexhaustible resources of Tribigild; confessed his own inability to prosecute the war; and extorted the permission of negotiating with his invincible adversary. The conditions of peace were dictated by the haughty rebel; and the peremptory demand of the head of Eutropius revealed the author and the design of this hostile conspiracy.
Yet these bloody laws, which instilled fear in a defenseless and demoralized people, were too shaky to hold back the daring ambitions of Tribigild the Ostrogoth. The colony of this warlike nation, established by Theodosius in one of Phrygia's most fertile areas, eagerly compared the slow results of hard work in farming with the successful plundering and generous rewards gained by Alaric; and their leader felt personally insulted by his unwelcoming treatment at the palace of Constantinople. A soft and prosperous province in the heart of the empire was shocked by the sound of war; and the loyal vassals who had been ignored or oppressed were once again respected as soon as they took on the hostile role of Barbarians. The vineyards and fertile fields between the fast-flowing Marsyas and the winding Mæander were ravaged with fire; the crumbling walls of the cities fell apart at the first blow from an enemy; the terrified inhabitants fled from a bloody massacre to the shores of the Hellespont; and a significant portion of Asia Minor was devastated by Tribigild's rebellion. His rapid advancement was halted by the resistance of the peasants of Pamphylia; the Ostrogoths, attacked in a narrow pass between the city of Selgæ, a deep swamp, and the rugged cliffs of Mount Taurus, were defeated, losing many of their bravest soldiers. However, the spirit of their leader was not discouraged by defeat; his army was constantly replenished by waves of Barbarians and outlaws eager to engage in robbery under the more honorable titles of war and conquest. Rumors of Tribigild's success could be suppressed for a time by fear or masked by flattery, but they gradually alarmed both the court and the capital. Every misfortune was exaggerated with dark and uncertain hints; and the future plans of the rebels became subjects of anxious speculation. Whenever Tribigild moved into the interior, the Romans believed he intended to cross Mount Taurus and invade Syria. If he headed toward the sea, they suspected, and perhaps even suggested to the Gothic leader, the more dangerous plan of arming a fleet in the harbors of Ionia and extending his raids along the coast from the mouth of the Nile to the port of Constantinople. The looming danger and Tribigild's stubborn refusal to negotiate forced Eutropius to call a war council. After claiming the privileges of a seasoned soldier for himself, the eunuch entrusted the defense of Thrace and the Hellespont to Gainas the Goth, and the command of the Asiatic army to his favorite, Leo; two generals who, in different but effective ways, advanced the rebels' cause. Leo, who was nicknamed the Ajax of the East for his large stature and dull mind, had abandoned his original job as a woolcomber to take on the military profession, though with much less skill and success; his unpredictable military actions were poorly conceived and executed, lacking an understanding of real challenges and carelessly ignoring every favorable opportunity. The rashness of the Ostrogoths had led them into a weak position between the Rivers Melas and Eurymedon, where they were nearly besieged by the peasants of Pamphylia; however, the arrival of an Imperial army, instead of finishing them off, provided them the chance for safety and victory. Tribigild caught the Romans’ unguarded camp by surprise in the dark of night; he swayed the loyalty of most of the Barbarian auxiliaries, and easily dispersed the troops that had been weakened by lax discipline and the capital's decadence. Gainas, who had boldly orchestrated and executed the death of Rufinus, became resentful of the fortune of his unworthy successor; he felt dishonor in enduring the subservient rule of a eunuch; and the ambitious Goth was publicly accused of secretly stirring up the revolt of Tribigild, with whom he shared a personal and national alliance. When Gainas crossed the Hellespont to rally the remnants of the Asiatic troops under his banner, he skillfully aligned his movements with the desires of the Ostrogoths; by retreating, he abandoned the territory they wished to invade, or by advancing, he facilitated the defection of the Barbarian auxiliaries. To the Imperial court, he repeatedly praised the courage, ingenuity, and endless resources of Tribigild; he admitted his own inability to continue the war; and he extracted permission to negotiate with his formidable opponent. The terms of peace were dictated by the audacious rebel; and his demand for Eutropius's head revealed the mastermind and intention behind this hostile conspiracy.
Chapter XXXII: Emperors Arcadius, Eutropius, Theodosius II.—Part II.
The bold satirist, who has indulged his discontent by the partial and passionate censure of the Christian emperors, violates the dignity, rather than the truth, of history, by comparing the son of Theodosius to one of those harmless and simple animals, who scarcely feel that they are the property of their shepherd. Two passions, however, fear and conjugal affection, awakened the languid soul of Arcadius: he was terrified by the threats of a victorious Barbarian; and he yielded to the tender eloquence of his wife Eudoxia, who, with a flood of artificial tears, presenting her infant children to their father, implored his justice for some real or imaginary insult, which she imputed to the audacious eunuch. The emperor's hand was directed to sign the condemnation of Eutropius; the magic spell, which during four years had bound the prince and the people, was instantly dissolved; and the acclamations that so lately hailed the merit and fortune of the favorite, were converted into the clamors of the soldiers and people, who reproached his crimes, and pressed his immediate execution. In this hour of distress and despair, his only refuge was in the sanctuary of the church, whose privileges he had wisely or profanely attempted to circumscribe; and the most eloquent of the saints, John Chrysostom, enjoyed the triumph of protecting a prostrate minister, whose choice had raised him to the ecclesiastical throne of Constantinople. The archbishop, ascending the pulpit of the cathedral, that he might be distinctly seen and heard by an innumerable crowd of either sex and of every age, pronounced a seasonable and pathetic discourse on the forgiveness of injuries, and the instability of human greatness. The agonies of the pale and affrighted wretch, who lay grovelling under the table of the altar, exhibited a solemn and instructive spectacle; and the orator, who was afterwards accused of insulting the misfortunes of Eutropius, labored to excite the contempt, that he might assuage the fury, of the people. The powers of humanity, of superstition, and of eloquence, prevailed. The empress Eudoxia was restrained by her own prejudices, or by those of her subjects, from violating the sanctuary of the church; and Eutropius was tempted to capitulate, by the milder arts of persuasion, and by an oath, that his life should be spared. Careless of the dignity of their sovereign, the new ministers of the palace immediately published an edict to declare, that his late favorite had disgraced the names of consul and patrician, to abolish his statues, to confiscate his wealth, and to inflict a perpetual exile in the Island of Cyprus. A despicable and decrepit eunuch could no longer alarm the fears of his enemies; nor was he capable of enjoying what yet remained, the comforts of peace, of solitude, and of a happy climate. But their implacable revenge still envied him the last moments of a miserable life, and Eutropius had no sooner touched the shores of Cyprus, than he was hastily recalled. The vain hope of eluding, by a change of place, the obligation of an oath, engaged the empress to transfer the scene of his trial and execution from Constantinople to the adjacent suburb of Chalcedon. The consul Aurelian pronounced the sentence; and the motives of that sentence expose the jurisprudence of a despotic government. The crimes which Eutropius had committed against the people might have justified his death; but he was found guilty of harnessing to his chariot the sacred animals, who, from their breed or color, were reserved for the use of the emperor alone.
The bold satirist, who expressed his discontent by passionately criticizing the Christian emperors, tarnished the dignity of history more than its truth, by likening the son of Theodosius to one of those harmless and simple animals that barely realize they belong to their shepherd. However, two emotions, fear and marital love, stirred the lethargic soul of Arcadius: he was frightened by the threats of a triumphant Barbarian, and he succumbed to the persuasive charm of his wife Eudoxia, who, with a flood of artificial tears, presented their infant children to him and pleaded for his justice regarding a real or imagined insult that she blamed on the bold eunuch. The emperor's hand moved to sign the condemnation of Eutropius; the magical hold that had bound the prince and the people for four years was immediately broken, and the cheers that had recently celebrated the favor and success of Eutropius transformed into the shouts of soldiers and citizens, who denounced his crimes and demanded his swift execution. In this moment of crisis and despair, his only refuge was in the church, whose privileges he had either wisely or profanely tried to limit; and the most eloquent of saints, John Chrysostom, found triumph in protecting a fallen minister whose choice had elevated him to the ecclesiastical throne of Constantinople. The archbishop went up to the pulpit of the cathedral, so he could be clearly seen and heard by a countless crowd of all ages and genders, and delivered a timely and heartfelt speech about forgiveness and the instability of human greatness. The agony of the pale and terrified wretch, who lay groveling under the altar table, presented a solemn and instructive scene; and the orator, who was later accused of mocking Eutropius's misfortunes, aimed to provoke contempt as a way to calm the rage of the people. The forces of humanity, superstition, and oratory won out. Empress Eudoxia was kept from violating the church’s sanctuary, either by her own biases or those of her subjects, and Eutropius was tempted to seek surrender by gentler persuasion and a promise that his life would be spared. Indifferent to their sovereign's dignity, the new palace ministers quickly issued an edict declaring that Eutropius, the former favorite, had sullied the titles of consul and patrician, that his statues would be torn down, his wealth confiscated, and that he would face permanent exile on the island of Cyprus. A contemptible and frail eunuch could no longer instill fear in his enemies; nor could he relish what was left— the comforts of peace, solitude, and a pleasant climate. Yet their relentless vengeance still denied him even the last moments of a wretched life, and the moment Eutropius set foot on Cyprus, he was swiftly recalled. The empty hope of escaping an oath by changing his location led the empress to move his trial and execution from Constantinople to the nearby suburb of Chalcedon. Consul Aurelian pronounced the sentence; and the reasons for that sentence reveal the legal principles of a tyrannical government. Eutropius’s crimes against the people might have warranted his death, but he was found guilty of harnessing to his chariot the sacred animals, which were reserved solely for the emperor's use based on their breed or color.
While this domestic revolution was transacted, Gainas openly revolted from his allegiance; united his forces at Thyatira in Lydia, with those of Tribigild; and still maintained his superior ascendant over the rebellious leader of the Ostrogoths. The confederate armies advanced, without resistance, to the straits of the Hellespont and the Bosphorus; and Arcadius was instructed to prevent the loss of his Asiatic dominions, by resigning his authority and his person to the faith of the Barbarians. The church of the holy martyr Euphemia, situate on a lofty eminence near Chalcedon, was chosen for the place of the interview. Gainas bowed with reverence at the feet of the emperor, whilst he required the sacrifice of Aurelian and Saturninus, two ministers of consular rank; and their naked necks were exposed, by the haughty rebel, to the edge of the sword, till he condescended to grant them a precarious and disgraceful respite. The Goths, according to the terms of the agreement, were immediately transported from Asia into Europe; and their victorious chief, who accepted the title of master-general of the Roman armies, soon filled Constantinople with his troops, and distributed among his dependants the honors and rewards of the empire. In his early youth, Gainas had passed the Danube as a suppliant and a fugitive: his elevation had been the work of valor and fortune; and his indiscreet or perfidious conduct was the cause of his rapid downfall. Notwithstanding the vigorous opposition of the archbishop, he importunately claimed for his Arian sectaries the possession of a peculiar church; and the pride of the Catholics was offended by the public toleration of heresy. Every quarter of Constantinople was filled with tumult and disorder; and the Barbarians gazed with such ardor on the rich shops of the jewellers, and the tables of the bankers, which were covered with gold and silver, that it was judged prudent to remove those dangerous temptations from their sight. They resented the injurious precaution; and some alarming attempts were made, during the night, to attack and destroy with fire the Imperial palace. In this state of mutual and suspicious hostility, the guards and the people of Constantinople shut the gates, and rose in arms to prevent or to punish the conspiracy of the Goths. During the absence of Gainas, his troops were surprised and oppressed; seven thousand Barbarians perished in this bloody massacre. In the fury of the pursuit, the Catholics uncovered the roof, and continued to throw down flaming logs of wood, till they overwhelmed their adversaries, who had retreated to the church or conventicle of the Arians. Gainas was either innocent of the design, or too confident of his success; he was astonished by the intelligence that the flower of his army had been ingloriously destroyed; that he himself was declared a public enemy; and that his countryman, Fravitta, a brave and loyal confederate, had assumed the management of the war by sea and land. The enterprises of the rebel, against the cities of Thrace, were encountered by a firm and well-ordered defence; his hungry soldiers were soon reduced to the grass that grew on the margin of the fortifications; and Gainas, who vainly regretted the wealth and luxury of Asia, embraced a desperate resolution of forcing the passage of the Hellespont. He was destitute of vessels; but the woods of the Chersonesus afforded materials for rafts, and his intrepid Barbarians did not refuse to trust themselves to the waves. But Fravitta attentively watched the progress of their undertaking. As soon as they had gained the middle of the stream, the Roman galleys, impelled by the full force of oars, of the current, and of a favorable wind, rushed forwards in compact order, and with irresistible weight; and the Hellespont was covered with the fragments of the Gothic shipwreck. After the destruction of his hopes, and the loss of many thousands of his bravest soldiers, Gainas, who could no longer aspire to govern or to subdue the Romans, determined to resume the independence of a savage life. A light and active body of Barbarian horse, disengaged from their infantry and baggage, might perform in eight or ten days a march of three hundred miles from the Hellespont to the Danube; the garrisons of that important frontier had been gradually annihilated; the river, in the month of December, would be deeply frozen; and the unbounded prospect of Scythia was opened to the ambition of Gainas. This design was secretly communicated to the national troops, who devoted themselves to the fortunes of their leader; and before the signal of departure was given, a great number of provincial auxiliaries, whom he suspected of an attachment to their native country, were perfidiously massacred. The Goths advanced, by rapid marches, through the plains of Thrace; and they were soon delivered from the fear of a pursuit, by the vanity of Fravitta, who, instead of extinguishing the war, hastened to enjoy the popular applause, and to assume the peaceful honors of the consulship. But a formidable ally appeared in arms to vindicate the majesty of the empire, and to guard the peace and liberty of Scythia. The superior forces of Uldin, king of the Huns, opposed the progress of Gainas; a hostile and ruined country prohibited his retreat; he disdained to capitulate; and after repeatedly attempting to cut his way through the ranks of the enemy, he was slain, with his desperate followers, in the field of battle. Eleven days after the naval victory of the Hellespont, the head of Gainas, the inestimable gift of the conqueror, was received at Constantinople with the most liberal expressions of gratitude; and the public deliverance was celebrated by festivals and illuminations. The triumphs of Arcadius became the subject of epic poems; and the monarch, no longer oppressed by any hostile terrors, resigned himself to the mild and absolute dominion of his wife, the fair and artful Eudoxia, who was sullied her fame by the persecution of St. John Chrysostom.
While this domestic upheaval was happening, Gainas openly rebelled against his allegiance; he joined his forces at Thyatira in Lydia with those of Tribigild and maintained his dominance over the rebellious leader of the Ostrogoths. The united armies moved without resistance to the straits of the Hellespont and the Bosphorus; Arcadius was advised to save his Asian territories by surrendering his authority and himself to the Barbarians. The church of the holy martyr Euphemia, located on a high hill near Chalcedon, was chosen for the meeting. Gainas bowed respectfully at the feet of the emperor, while demanding the sacrifice of Aurelian and Saturninus, two high-ranking ministers. Their exposed necks were put on the line by the arrogant rebel until he reluctantly agreed to grant them a temporary and disgraceful reprieve. According to the terms of the agreement, the Goths were quickly moved from Asia to Europe; their victorious leader, who took the title of master-general of the Roman armies, soon filled Constantinople with his troops and distributed the empire’s honors and rewards amongst his followers. In his younger days, Gainas had crossed the Danube as a beggar and a fugitive; his rise to power was a result of bravery and fortune; and his reckless or treacherous actions led to his swift downfall. Despite the strong opposition from the archbishop, he persistently claimed a specific church for his Arian followers; this drew outrage from the Catholics who were offended by the public tolerance of heresy. Every area of Constantinople was filled with chaos, and the Barbarians gazed hungrily at the luxurious jewelry shops and the bankers' stalls overflowing with gold and silver, leading to the decision to remove these enticing temptations from their view. They took offense at this precaution; and during the night, some alarming attempts were made to attack and set fire to the Imperial palace. In this tense and distrustful atmosphere, the guards and the citizens of Constantinople locked the gates and took up arms to thwart or retaliate against the Goths’ conspiracy. While Gainas was away, his troops were caught off guard and overwhelmed; seven thousand Barbarians were killed in this bloody massacre. In their blind rage, the Catholics tore off the roof and continued to throw flaming logs until they overwhelmed their opponents, who had retreated to the church or gathering place of the Arians. Gainas was either unaware of the plan or overly confident in his success; he was stunned by the news that the best of his army had been defeated and that he had been declared a public enemy, while his countryman Fravitta, a brave and loyal ally, had taken charge of the war on both land and sea. The rebel's attacks on the cities of Thrace met with effective and organized resistance; his starving soldiers were soon left with nothing but grass at the edges of the fortifications; and Gainas, who longed for the wealth and comforts of Asia, made a desperate decision to force his way across the Hellespont. Lacking boats, he used materials from the woods of the Chersonesus to create rafts, and his fearless Barbarians did not hesitate to take to the waters. But Fravitta kept a close eye on their endeavor. Once they reached the middle of the river, the Roman ships, propelled by oars, the current, and a favorable wind, surged forward in tight formation, overwhelming them; the Hellespont became littered with the wreckage of Gothic ships. After his hopes were dashed and many of his bravest soldiers lost, Gainas, who could no longer aspire to control or conquer the Romans, decided to return to a savage life of independence. A small, agile group of Barbarian cavalry could cover the three hundred miles from the Hellespont to the Danube in eight to ten days; the garrisons at that crucial frontier had been gradually diminished; the river would be frozen in December; and the vast lands of Scythia lay open to Gainas’ ambitions. This plan was secretly shared with his national troops, who pledged allegiance to their leader; before the signal for departure was given, many provincial allies, whom he suspected might be loyal to their homeland, were treacherously killed. The Goths advanced rapidly through the plains of Thrace; their fear of pursuit was quickly alleviated by Fravitta's pride, who, instead of extinguishing the war, rushed to seek glory and the peaceful honors of the consulship. But a formidable ally had emerged to defend the empire’s authority and safeguard the peace and liberty of Scythia. The greater forces of Uldin, king of the Huns, stood in Gainas' way; a hostile and ravaged land prevented his retreat; he refused to negotiate; and after several attempts to break through enemy lines, he was killed, along with his desperate followers, in battle. Eleven days after the naval victory at the Hellespont, Gainas' head, the priceless gift of the conqueror, arrived in Constantinople, receiving extravagant expressions of gratitude; the public deliverance was celebrated with festivals and illuminations. The triumphs of Arcadius were turned into epic poems; the monarch, no longer burdened by any external threats, yielded to the gentle but absolute control of his wife, the beautiful and cunning Eudoxia, who tarnished her reputation through the persecution of St. John Chrysostom.
After the death of the indolent Nectarius, the successor of Gregory Nazianzen, the church of Constantinople was distracted by the ambition of rival candidates, who were not ashamed to solicit, with gold or flattery, the suffrage of the people, or of the favorite. On this occasion Eutropius seems to have deviated from his ordinary maxims; and his uncorrupted judgment was determined only by the superior merit of a stranger. In a late journey into the East, he had admired the sermons of John, a native and presbyter of Antioch, whose name has been distinguished by the epithet of Chrysostom, or the Golden Mouth. A private order was despatched to the governor of Syria; and as the people might be unwilling to resign their favorite preacher, he was transported, with speed and secrecy in a post-chariot, from Antioch to Constantinople. The unanimous and unsolicited consent of the court, the clergy, and the people, ratified the choice of the minister; and, both as a saint and as an orator, the new archbishop surpassed the sanguine expectations of the public. Born of a noble and opulent family, in the capital of Syria, Chrysostom had been educated, by the care of a tender mother, under the tuition of the most skilful masters. He studied the art of rhetoric in the school of Libanius; and that celebrated sophist, who soon discovered the talents of his disciple, ingenuously confessed that John would have deserved to succeed him, had he not been stolen away by the Christians. His piety soon disposed him to receive the sacrament of baptism; to renounce the lucrative and honorable profession of the law; and to bury himself in the adjacent desert, where he subdued the lusts of the flesh by an austere penance of six years. His infirmities compelled him to return to the society of mankind; and the authority of Meletius devoted his talents to the service of the church: but in the midst of his family, and afterwards on the archiepiscopal throne, Chrysostom still persevered in the practice of the monastic virtues. The ample revenues, which his predecessors had consumed in pomp and luxury, he diligently applied to the establishment of hospitals; and the multitudes, who were supported by his charity, preferred the eloquent and edifying discourses of their archbishop to the amusements of the theatre or the circus. The monuments of that eloquence, which was admired near twenty years at Antioch and Constantinople, have been carefully preserved; and the possession of near one thousand sermons, or homilies has authorized the critics of succeeding times to appreciate the genuine merit of Chrysostom. They unanimously attribute to the Christian orator the free command of an elegant and copious language; the judgment to conceal the advantages which he derived from the knowledge of rhetoric and philosophy; an inexhaustible fund of metaphors and similitudes of ideas and images, to vary and illustrate the most familiar topics; the happy art of engaging the passions in the service of virtue; and of exposing the folly, as well as the turpitude, of vice, almost with the truth and spirit of a dramatic representation.
After the death of the lazy Nectarius, Gregory Nazianzen's successor, the church of Constantinople was thrown into chaos by the ambitions of rival candidates, who shamelessly sought the support of the people, either through money or flattery. In this situation, Eutropius seemed to stray from his usual principles; his untainted judgment was swayed only by the undeniable merit of an outsider. During a recent trip to the East, he had been impressed by the sermons of John, a native from Antioch and a presbyter, who is known by the nickname Chrysostom, meaning Golden Mouth. A private order was sent to the governor of Syria; and anticipating that the people might not be willing to part with their beloved preacher, he was quickly and discreetly transported from Antioch to Constantinople in a post-chariot. The unanimous and unrequested approval from the court, the clergy, and the people confirmed the minister's selection; and, both as a saint and as an orator, the new archbishop exceeded the hopeful expectations of the public. Born into a noble and wealthy family in the capital of Syria, Chrysostom was raised by a caring mother and instructed by the best teachers. He studied rhetoric under Libanius; that renowned sophist quickly recognized his student's talents and honestly admitted that John deserved to succeed him, had he not been taken away by the Christians. His strong faith soon led him to receive baptism, give up the lucrative and respected law profession, and retreat into the nearby desert, where he spent six years in harsh penance to control his desires. His health issues forced him to return to society; and under the authority of Meletius, he devoted his talents to the church. However, even in the company of his family and later on the archbishop's throne, Chrysostom continued to practice the virtues of monastic life. The substantial wealth that his predecessors had squandered on luxury, he diligently redirected towards establishing hospitals; and the countless people supported by his generosity preferred listening to the inspiring and eloquent messages of their archbishop over the entertainment of the theater or the circus. The records of that eloquence, which was admired for nearly twenty years in Antioch and Constantinople, have been carefully preserved; and the collection of nearly one thousand sermons or homilies has allowed critics in later times to recognize Chrysostom's genuine talent. They unanimously attribute to this Christian orator a command of elegant and rich language, the wisdom to hide the benefits he gained from his knowledge of rhetoric and philosophy, an endless supply of metaphors and imagery to vary and illuminate the most common subjects, the skillful ability to engage emotions in the service of virtue, and the talent to reveal the foolishness and vileness of vice almost with the truth and passion of a dramatic performance.
The pastoral labors of the archbishop of Constantinople provoked, and gradually united against him, two sorts of enemies; the aspiring clergy, who envied his success, and the obstinate sinners, who were offended by his reproofs. When Chrysostom thundered, from the pulpit of St. Sophia, against the degeneracy of the Christians, his shafts were spent among the crowd, without wounding, or even marking, the character of any individual. When he declaimed against the peculiar vices of the rich, poverty might obtain a transient consolation from his invectives; but the guilty were still sheltered by their numbers; and the reproach itself was dignified by some ideas of superiority and enjoyment. But as the pyramid rose towards the summit, it insensibly diminished to a point; and the magistrates, the ministers, the favorite eunuchs, the ladies of the court, the empress Eudoxia herself, had a much larger share of guilt to divide among a smaller proportion of criminals. The personal applications of the audience were anticipated, or confirmed, by the testimony of their own conscience; and the intrepid preacher assumed the dangerous right of exposing both the offence and the offender to the public abhorrence. The secret resentment of the court encouraged the discontent of the clergy and monks of Constantinople, who were too hastily reformed by the fervent zeal of their archbishop. He had condemned, from the pulpit, the domestic females of the clergy of Constantinople, who, under the name of servants, or sisters, afforded a perpetual occasion either of sin or of scandal. The silent and solitary ascetics, who had secluded themselves from the world, were entitled to the warmest approbation of Chrysostom; but he despised and stigmatized, as the disgrace of their holy profession, the crowd of degenerate monks, who, from some unworthy motives of pleasure or profit, so frequently infested the streets of the capital. To the voice of persuasion, the archbishop was obliged to add the terrors of authority; and his ardor, in the exercise of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, was not always exempt from passion; nor was it always guided by prudence. Chrysostom was naturally of a choleric disposition. Although he struggled, according to the precepts of the gospel, to love his private enemies, he indulged himself in the privilege of hating the enemies of God and of the church; and his sentiments were sometimes delivered with too much energy of countenance and expression. He still maintained, from some considerations of health or abstinence, his former habits of taking his repasts alone; and this inhospitable custom, which his enemies imputed to pride, contributed, at least, to nourish the infirmity of a morose and unsocial humor. Separated from that familiar intercourse, which facilitates the knowledge and the despatch of business, he reposed an unsuspecting confidence in his deacon Serapion; and seldom applied his speculative knowledge of human nature to the particular character, either of his dependants, or of his equals. Conscious of the purity of his intentions, and perhaps of the superiority of his genius, the archbishop of Constantinople extended the jurisdiction of the Imperial city, that he might enlarge the sphere of his pastoral labors; and the conduct which the profane imputed to an ambitious motive, appeared to Chrysostom himself in the light of a sacred and indispensable duty. In his visitation through the Asiatic provinces, he deposed thirteen bishops of Lydia and Phrygia; and indiscreetly declared that a deep corruption of simony and licentiousness had infected the whole episcopal order. If those bishops were innocent, such a rash and unjust condemnation must excite a well-grounded discontent. If they were guilty, the numerous associates of their guilt would soon discover that their own safety depended on the ruin of the archbishop; whom they studied to represent as the tyrant of the Eastern church.
The pastoral efforts of the archbishop of Constantinople stirred up, and gradually united against him, two groups of enemies: the ambitious clergy, who envied his success, and the stubborn sinners, who were offended by his criticisms. When Chrysostom preached from the pulpit of St. Sophia about the moral decline of Christians, his words struck the crowd without leaving a mark on any individual’s reputation. When he called out the specific vices of the wealthy, the poor might have found some temporary relief in his harsh words, but the guilty still found shelter in their numbers; their shame was offset by a sense of superiority and enjoyment. However, as the pyramid of guilt grew taller, it narrowed toward the top; the magistrates, ministers, favored eunuchs, court ladies, and Empress Eudoxia herself shared a larger portion of guilt among a smaller group of offenders. The personal reflections of the audience were either anticipated or confirmed by their own consciences; the brave preacher took the risky stance of exposing both the sin and the sinner to public disdain. The quiet resentment from the court fueled the discontent of the clergy and monks of Constantinople, who were too quickly reformed by their archbishop's intense zeal. He condemned, from the pulpit, the women in the clergy's households, who, under the guise of servants or sisters, provided constant opportunities for either sin or scandal. The silent and solitary ascetics, who removed themselves from society, were deserving of Chrysostom's highest praise; however, he looked down upon and condemned the many degenerate monks, who, driven by unworthy desires for pleasure or profit, frequently roamed the streets of the capital. The archbishop had to pair persuasion with the weight of authority; his enthusiasm in exercising church authority wasn't always free from emotion, nor was it always wise. Chrysostom had a naturally fiery temperament. Even though he tried to follow the gospel's teaching to love his private enemies, he felt justified in hating the enemies of God and the church, and he sometimes expressed his feelings with too much intensity. He continued to maintain the habit of eating alone, perhaps for health or abstinence reasons; this unwelcoming practice, which his foes saw as arrogance, only nurtured his tendency to be morose and unsociable. Removed from the friendly interactions that help manage and understand business, he placed an unwary trust in his deacon Serapion, rarely applying his theoretical understanding of human nature to the specific traits of his subordinates or peers. Assured of the purity of his intentions, and possibly aware of his own genius, the archbishop sought to broaden the Imperial city’s jurisdiction to expand his pastoral reach; what others viewed as ambition, he saw as a holy and necessary responsibility. During his travels through the Asiatic provinces, he removed thirteen bishops from Lydia and Phrygia and indiscreetly announced that a serious corruption of simony and moral decay had tainted the entire episcopal order. If those bishops were innocent, such a reckless and unjust condemnation would surely cause legitimate discontent. If they were guilty, their numerous accomplices would quickly realize that their own safety relied on the downfall of the archbishop, who they aimed to portray as a tyrant of the Eastern church.
This ecclesiastical conspiracy was managed by Theophilus, archbishop of Alexandria, an active and ambitious prelate, who displayed the fruits of rapine in monuments of ostentation. His national dislike to the rising greatness of a city which degraded him from the second to the third rank in the Christian world, was exasperated by some personal dispute with Chrysostom himself. By the private invitation of the empress, Theophilus landed at Constantinople with a stout body of Egyptian mariners, to encounter the populace; and a train of dependent bishops, to secure, by their voices, the majority of a synod. The synod was convened in the suburb of Chalcedon, surnamed the Oak, where Rufinus had erected a stately church and monastery; and their proceedings were continued during fourteen days, or sessions. A bishop and a deacon accused the archbishop of Constantinople; but the frivolous or improbable nature of the forty-seven articles which they presented against him, may justly be considered as a fair and unexceptional panegyric. Four successive summons were signified to Chrysostom; but he still refused to trust either his person or his reputation in the hands of his implacable enemies, who, prudently declining the examination of any particular charges, condemned his contumacious disobedience, and hastily pronounced a sentence of deposition. The synod of the Oak immediately addressed the emperor to ratify and execute their judgment, and charitably insinuated, that the penalties of treason might be inflicted on the audacious preacher, who had reviled, under the name of Jezebel, the empress Eudoxia herself. The archbishop was rudely arrested, and conducted through the city, by one of the Imperial messengers, who landed him, after a short navigation, near the entrance of the Euxine; from whence, before the expiration of two days, he was gloriously recalled.
This church conspiracy was led by Theophilus, the archbishop of Alexandria, an ambitious and active church leader who showed off his wealth through impressive monuments. His resentment toward the growing prominence of a city that demoted him in rank within the Christian community was worsened by a personal dispute with Chrysostom. Acting on a private invitation from the empress, Theophilus arrived in Constantinople with a strong group of Egyptian sailors to face the local population, along with a group of supportive bishops to ensure they had the majority at a synod. The synod was held in the Chalcedon suburb known as the Oak, where Rufinus had built a grand church and monastery; their meetings lasted for fourteen days. A bishop and a deacon accused the archbishop of Constantinople, but the weak and unlikely nature of the forty-seven charges they brought forward could easily be viewed as an unintentional compliment. Chrysostom received four summons, but he consistently refused to put himself or his reputation in the hands of his relentless enemies, who cleverly avoided discussing specific accusations and quickly declared him guilty of disobedience, hastily deposing him. The synod of the Oak promptly appealed to the emperor to confirm and carry out their decision, subtly suggesting that treason charges could be applied to the bold preacher, who had insulted the empress Eudoxia by calling her Jezebel. The archbishop was forcibly arrested and escorted through the city by an Imperial messenger, who, after a brief boat ride, left him near the entrance to the Black Sea; within two days, he was triumphantly reinstated.
The first astonishment of his faithful people had been mute and passive: they suddenly rose with unanimous and irresistible fury. Theophilus escaped, but the promiscuous crowd of monks and Egyptian mariners was slaughtered without pity in the streets of Constantinople. A seasonable earthquake justified the interposition of Heaven; the torrent of sedition rolled forwards to the gates of the palace; and the empress, agitated by fear or remorse, threw herself at the feet of Arcadius, and confessed that the public safety could be purchased only by the restoration of Chrysostom. The Bosphorus was covered with innumerable vessels; the shores of Europe and Asia were profusely illuminated; and the acclamations of a victorious people accompanied, from the port to the cathedral, the triumph of the archbishop; who, too easily, consented to resume the exercise of his functions, before his sentence had been legally reversed by the authority of an ecclesiastical synod. Ignorant, or careless, of the impending danger, Chrysostom indulged his zeal, or perhaps his resentment; declaimed with peculiar asperity against female vices; and condemned the profane honors which were addressed, almost in the precincts of St. Sophia, to the statue of the empress. His imprudence tempted his enemies to inflame the haughty spirit of Eudoxia, by reporting, or perhaps inventing, the famous exordium of a sermon, "Herodias is again furious; Herodias again dances; she once more requires the head of John;" an insolent allusion, which, as a woman and a sovereign, it was impossible for her to forgive. The short interval of a perfidious truce was employed to concert more effectual measures for the disgrace and ruin of the archbishop. A numerous council of the Eastern prelates, who were guided from a distance by the advice of Theophilus, confirmed the validity, without examining the justice, of the former sentence; and a detachment of Barbarian troops was introduced into the city, to suppress the emotions of the people. On the vigil of Easter, the solemn administration of baptism was rudely interrupted by the soldiers, who alarmed the modesty of the naked catechumens, and violated, by their presence, the awful mysteries of the Christian worship. Arsacius occupied the church of St. Sophia, and the archiepiscopal throne. The Catholics retreated to the baths of Constantine, and afterwards to the fields; where they were still pursued and insulted by the guards, the bishops, and the magistrates. The fatal day of the second and final exile of Chrysostom was marked by the conflagration of the cathedral, of the senate-house, and of the adjacent buildings; and this calamity was imputed, without proof, but not without probability, to the despair of a persecuted faction.
The initial shock of his loyal followers was silent and passive, but then they erupted with a united and unstoppable rage. Theophilus managed to escape, but the mixed crowd of monks and Egyptian sailors was mercilessly slaughtered in the streets of Constantinople. A timely earthquake was seen as a sign from Heaven; the wave of unrest surged toward the palace gates; and the empress, either terrified or regretful, fell at Arcadius's feet and admitted that public safety could only be achieved by bringing back Chrysostom. The Bosphorus was filled with countless ships; the shores of Europe and Asia were brightly lit; and the cheers of a triumphant crowd celebrated the archbishop’s return from the port to the cathedral. He too easily agreed to resume his duties before his sentence had been legally overturned by an ecclesiastical council. Unaware or unconcerned about the imminent danger, Chrysostom indulged his zeal, or maybe his anger; he harshly criticized female vices and condemned the disrespectful honors paid to the statue of the empress, almost within the precincts of St. Sophia. His rashness encouraged his enemies to provoke the proud spirit of Eudoxia by sharing, or perhaps fabricating, the famous opening of a sermon: "Herodias is furious once more; Herodias is dancing again; she demands the head of John again," a disrespectful reference that, as a woman and a ruler, she could not forgive. The brief pause in hostilities was used to plan more effective actions for the archbishop's disgrace and downfall. A large council of Eastern bishops, influenced from afar by Theophilus’s counsel, confirmed the legitimacy of the previous sentence without scrutinizing its fairness; and a group of barbarian soldiers was brought into the city to quell the people's unrest. On the night before Easter, the solemn ritual of baptism was abruptly interrupted by soldiers, who disrespected the modesty of the naked catechumens and profaned the sacred mysteries of Christian worship by their presence. Arsacius took over St. Sophia and the archbishop's position. The Catholics retreated to the baths of Constantine and later to the fields, where they were still chased and insulted by guards, bishops, and officials. The fateful day of Chrysostom’s second and final exile was marked by the burning of the cathedral, the senate house, and nearby buildings; this disaster was blamed, without evidence but not without likelihood, on the despair of a persecuted group.
Cicero might claim some merit, if his voluntary banishment preserved the peace of the republic; but the submission of Chrysostom was the indispensable duty of a Christian and a subject. Instead of listening to his humble prayer, that he might be permitted to reside at Cyzicus, or Nicomedia, the inflexible empress assigned for his exile the remote and desolate town of Cucusus, among the ridges of Mount Taurus, in the Lesser Armenia. A secret hope was entertained, that the archbishop might perish in a difficult and dangerous march of seventy days, in the heat of summer, through the provinces of Asia Minor, where he was continually threatened by the hostile attacks of the Isaurians, and the more implacable fury of the monks. Yet Chrysostom arrived in safety at the place of his confinement; and the three years which he spent at Cucusus, and the neighboring town of Arabissus, were the last and most glorious of his life. His character was consecrated by absence and persecution; the faults of his administration were no longer remembered; but every tongue repeated the praises of his genius and virtue: and the respectful attention of the Christian world was fixed on a desert spot among the mountains of Taurus. From that solitude the archbishop, whose active mind was invigorated by misfortunes, maintained a strict and frequent correspondence with the most distant provinces; exhorted the separate congregation of his faithful adherents to persevere in their allegiance; urged the destruction of the temples of Phnicia, and the extirpation of heresy in the Isle of Cyprus; extended his pastoral care to the missions of Persia and Scythia; negotiated, by his ambassadors, with the Roman pontiff and the emperor Honorius; and boldly appealed, from a partial synod, to the supreme tribunal of a free and general council. The mind of the illustrious exile was still independent; but his captive body was exposed to the revenge of the oppressors, who continued to abuse the name and authority of Arcadius. An order was despatched for the instant removal of Chrysostom to the extreme desert of Pityus: and his guards so faithfully obeyed their cruel instructions, that, before he reached the sea-coast of the Euxine, he expired at Comana, in Pontus, in the sixtieth year of his age. The succeeding generation acknowledged his innocence and merit. The archbishops of the East, who might blush that their predecessors had been the enemies of Chrysostom, were gradually disposed, by the firmness of the Roman pontiff, to restore the honors of that venerable name. At the pious solicitation of the clergy and people of Constantinople, his relics, thirty years after his death, were transported from their obscure sepulchre to the royal city. The emperor Theodosius advanced to receive them as far as Chalcedon; and, falling prostrate on the coffin, implored, in the name of his guilty parents, Arcadius and Eudoxia, the forgiveness of the injured saint.
Cicero might deserve some recognition if his self-imposed exile maintained the peace of the republic, but it was the essential duty of a Christian and a subject for Chrysostom to submit. Rather than considering his humble request to live in Cyzicus or Nicomedia, the unyielding empress sent him into exile in the remote and desolate town of Cucusus, located among the ridges of Mount Taurus in Lesser Armenia. There was a secret hope that the archbishop might die during the challenging and perilous seventy-day journey through the hot summer months in Asia Minor, where he faced constant threats from the hostile Isaurians and the relentless fury of the monks. However, Chrysostom safely reached his place of confinement, and the three years he spent in Cucusus and the nearby town of Arabissus became the final and most glorious years of his life. His character gained sanctity through absence and persecution; the faults of his leadership were forgotten, and everyone spoke of his genius and virtue: all eyes in the Christian world were focused on a remote area in the Taurus mountains. From that solitude, the archbishop, whose active mind thrived on adversity, maintained a strong and frequent correspondence with provinces far away; he encouraged his devoted followers to stay loyal, pushed for the destruction of the temples in Phoenicia, and advocated for eradicating heresy in Cyprus; he expanded his pastoral care to missions in Persia and Scythia; he negotiated, through his ambassadors, with the Roman pope and Emperor Honorius; and he boldly appealed from a biased synod to the highest authority of a free and general council. The proud exile's mind remained independent, but his imprisoned body was vulnerable to the vengeance of oppressors who continued to misuse the name and authority of Arcadius. An order was sent for Chrysostom's immediate transfer to the far-off desert of Pityus, and his guards obediently followed their cruel orders, so that before reaching the coast of the Euxine, he died at Comana in Pontus, at sixty years old. The next generation recognized his innocence and worth. The archbishops of the East, who might feel shame for their predecessors' opposition to Chrysostom, were gradually persuaded by the resolve of the Roman pope to restore respect for that esteemed name. At the heartfelt request of the clergy and people of Constantinople, his remains were moved thirty years after his death from their forgotten grave to the royal city. Emperor Theodosius went out to meet them as far as Chalcedon; he fell prostrate before the coffin, imploring forgiveness for the sins of his guilty parents, Arcadius and Eudoxia.
Chapter XXXII: Emperors Arcadius, Eutropius, Theodosius II.—Part III.
Yet a reasonable doubt may be entertained, whether any stain of hereditary guilt could be derived from Arcadius to his successor. Eudoxia was a young and beautiful woman, who indulged her passions, and despised her husband; Count John enjoyed, at least, the familiar confidence of the empress; and the public named him as the real father of Theodosius the younger. The birth of a son was accepted, however, by the pious husband, as an event the most fortunate and honorable to himself, to his family, and to the Eastern world: and the royal infant, by an unprecedented favor, was invested with the titles of Cæsar and Augustus. In less than four years afterwards, Eudoxia, in the bloom of youth, was destroyed by the consequences of a miscarriage; and this untimely death confounded the prophecy of a holy bishop, who, amidst the universal joy, had ventured to foretell, that she should behold the long and auspicious reign of her glorious son. The Catholics applauded the justice of Heaven, which avenged the persecution of St. Chrysostom; and perhaps the emperor was the only person who sincerely bewailed the loss of the haughty and rapacious Eudoxia. Such a domestic misfortune afflicted him more deeply than the public calamities of the East; the licentious excursions, from Pontus to Palestine, of the Isaurian robbers, whose impunity accused the weakness of the government; and the earthquakes, the conflagrations, the famine, and the flights of locusts, which the popular discontent was equally disposed to attribute to the incapacity of the monarch. At length, in the thirty-first year of his age, after a reign (if we may abuse that word) of thirteen years, three months, and fifteen days, Arcadius expired in the palace of Constantinople. It is impossible to delineate his character; since, in a period very copiously furnished with historical materials, it has not been possible to remark one action that properly belongs to the son of the great Theodosius.
Yet a reasonable doubt can be considered about whether any stain of inherited guilt could be passed from Arcadius to his successor. Eudoxia was a young and beautiful woman who gave in to her passions and looked down on her husband; Count John at least enjoyed the empress's trust, and the public named him as the true father of Theodosius the Younger. However, the pious husband accepted the birth of a son as a fortunate and honorable event for himself, his family, and the Eastern world: the royal infant, by an extraordinary favor, was granted the titles of Caesar and Augustus. Less than four years later, Eudoxia, in her youth, died from complications after a miscarriage; this untimely death contradicted a prophecy from a holy bishop who, amid the universal joy, had dared to predict that she would witness the long and prosperous reign of her glorious son. The Catholics celebrated the justice of Heaven, which avenged the persecution of St. Chrysostom; and perhaps the emperor was the only one who truly mourned the loss of the proud and greedy Eudoxia. Such a personal tragedy affected him more deeply than the public disasters in the East; the reckless raids of Isaurian robbers, which stretched from Pontus to Palestine, exposed the government's weakness; and the earthquakes, fires, famine, and swarms of locusts that the public blamed on the king’s ineptitude. Finally, at the age of thirty-one, after a reign (if that term can be applied) of thirteen years, three months, and fifteen days, Arcadius passed away in the palace of Constantinople. It’s impossible to clearly define his character; even in a time rich with historical information, one cannot find a single action that truly belongs to the son of the great Theodosius.
The historian Procopius has indeed illuminated the mind of the dying emperor with a ray of human prudence, or celestial wisdom. Arcadius considered, with anxious foresight, the helpless condition of his son Theodosius, who was no more than seven years of age, the dangerous factions of a minority, and the aspiring spirit of Jezdegerd, the Persian monarch. Instead of tempting the allegiance of an ambitious subject, by the participation of supreme power, he boldly appealed to the magnanimity of a king; and placed, by a solemn testament, the sceptre of the East in the hands of Jezdegerd himself. The royal guardian accepted and discharged this honorable trust with unexampled fidelity; and the infancy of Theodosius was protected by the arms and councils of Persia. Such is the singular narrative of Procopius; and his veracity is not disputed by Agathias, while he presumes to dissent from his judgment, and to arraign the wisdom of a Christian emperor, who, so rashly, though so fortunately, committed his son and his dominions to the unknown faith of a stranger, a rival, and a heathen. At the distance of one hundred and fifty years, this political question might be debated in the court of Justinian; but a prudent historian will refuse to examine the propriety, till he has ascertained the truth, of the testament of Arcadius. As it stands without a parallel in the history of the world, we may justly require, that it should be attested by the positive and unanimous evidence of contemporaries. The strange novelty of the event, which excites our distrust, must have attracted their notice; and their universal silence annihilates the vain tradition of the succeeding age.
The historian Procopius has truly shed light on the mind of the dying emperor with a flash of human wisdom or divine insight. Arcadius anxiously contemplated the vulnerable situation of his seven-year-old son, Theodosius, the dangerous factions he might face as a minor, and the ambitions of Jezdegerd, the Persian king. Instead of trying to win over an ambitious subject by sharing power, he boldly reached out to the generosity of a king and, through a formal will, entrusted the leadership of the East to Jezdegerd himself. The royal guardian accepted and fulfilled this noble responsibility with unmatched loyalty, and Theodosius's early years were safeguarded by the might and guidance of Persia. This is the unique account provided by Procopius, and Agathias does not dispute his truthfulness, even while he disagrees with Procopius's opinion and questions the judgment of a Christian emperor who, rather recklessly yet fortunately, placed his son and his territory in the hands of an unfamiliar faith from a rival and a pagan. A century and a half later, this political issue might be debated in the court of Justinian, but a wise historian will refuse to assess the propriety until he has confirmed the truth of Arcadius's will. Since it stands alone in world history, we can justifiably demand that it be supported by clear and unanimous testimony from those who were there. The oddity of the situation, which raises our suspicions, should have drawn their attention, and their complete silence dismisses the unfounded legends of later generations.
The maxims of Roman jurisprudence, if they could fairly be transferred from private property to public dominion, would have adjudged to the emperor Honorius the guardianship of his nephew, till he had attained, at least, the fourteenth year of his age. But the weakness of Honorius, and the calamities of his reign, disqualified him from prosecuting this natural claim; and such was the absolute separation of the two monarchies, both in interest and affection, that Constantinople would have obeyed, with less reluctance, the orders of the Persian, than those of the Italian, court. Under a prince whose weakness is disguised by the external signs of manhood and discretion, the most worthless favorites may secretly dispute the empire of the palace; and dictate to submissive provinces the commands of a master, whom they direct and despise. But the ministers of a child, who is incapable of arming them with the sanction of the royal name, must acquire and exercise an independent authority. The great officers of the state and army, who had been appointed before the death of Arcadius, formed an aristocracy, which might have inspired them with the idea of a free republic; and the government of the Eastern empire was fortunately assumed by the præfect Anthemius, who obtained, by his superior abilities, a lasting ascendant over the minds of his equals. The safety of the young emperor proved the merit and integrity of Anthemius; and his prudent firmness sustained the force and reputation of an infant reign. Uldin, with a formidable host of Barbarians, was encamped in the heart of Thrace; he proudly rejected all terms of accommodation; and, pointing to the rising sun, declared to the Roman ambassadors, that the course of that planet should alone terminate the conquest of the Huns. But the desertion of his confederates, who were privately convinced of the justice and liberality of the Imperial ministers, obliged Uldin to repass the Danube: the tribe of the Scyrri, which composed his rear-guard, was almost extirpated; and many thousand captives were dispersed to cultivate, with servile labor, the fields of Asia. In the midst of the public triumph, Constantinople was protected by a strong enclosure of new and more extensive walls; the same vigilant care was applied to restore the fortifications of the Illyrian cities; and a plan was judiciously conceived, which, in the space of seven years, would have secured the command of the Danube, by establishing on that river a perpetual fleet of two hundred and fifty armed vessels.
The principles of Roman law, if they could reasonably be applied from private property to public ownership, would have assigned the responsibility of caring for his nephew to Emperor Honorius until the boy reached at least the age of fourteen. However, Honorius's weakness and the troubles of his reign made it impossible for him to pursue this natural right. The divide between the two empires was so significant, both in terms of interests and loyalties, that Constantinople would have more readily followed the orders of the Persian court than those from the Italian court. Under a ruler whose frailty was masked by the outward signs of maturity and sound judgment, the most useless favorites could secretly vie for control over the palace and dictate orders to the conquered provinces on behalf of a ruler they both manipulated and looked down upon. But the advisors of a child, who lack the ability to empower them with the royal authority, must develop and enforce their own independent power. The high-ranking officials of the state and army, who had been appointed before Arcadius's death, formed an aristocracy that might have inspired thoughts of a free republic; fortunately, the governance of the Eastern Empire fell under the control of Prefect Anthemius, who won a lasting influence over his peers through his superior skills. The safety of the young emperor demonstrated Anthemius's merit and integrity; his wise firmness bolstered the strength and credibility of a fledgling reign. Uldin, leading a powerful force of barbarians, was stationed in the heart of Thrace; he arrogantly dismissed any offers of negotiation and declared to the Roman ambassadors, while gesturing toward the rising sun, that the path of that celestial body would determine the outcome of the Hunnic conquest. However, as his allies deserted him, secretly convinced of the fairness and generosity of the Imperial ministers, Uldin was forced to retreat across the Danube: the Scyrri tribe, which formed his rear guard, was nearly wiped out, and many thousands of captives were scattered to work the fields of Asia as forced laborers. Amidst the public celebration, Constantinople was fortified by a strong new set of expansive walls; similar diligence was applied to restore the defenses of the Illyrian cities, and a well-thought-out plan was devised which, over seven years, would have ensured control over the Danube by establishing a permanent fleet of 250 armed vessels on the river.
But the Romans had so long been accustomed to the authority of a monarch, that the first, even among the females, of the Imperial family, who displayed any courage or capacity, was permitted to ascend the vacant throne of Theodosius. His sister Pulcheria, who was only two years older than himself, received, at the age of sixteen, the title of Augusta; and though her favor might be sometimes clouded by caprice or intrigue, she continued to govern the Eastern empire near forty years; during the long minority of her brother, and after his death, in her own name, and in the name of Marcian, her nominal husband. From a motive either of prudence or religion, she embraced a life of celibacy; and notwithstanding some aspersions on the chastity of Pulcheria, this resolution, which she communicated to her sisters Arcadia and Marina, was celebrated by the Christian world, as the sublime effort of heroic piety. In the presence of the clergy and people, the three daughters of Arcadius dedicated their virginity to God; and the obligation of their solemn vow was inscribed on a tablet of gold and gems; which they publicly offered in the great church of Constantinople. Their palace was converted into a monastery; and all males, except the guides of their conscience, the saints who had forgotten the distinction of sexes, were scrupulously excluded from the holy threshold. Pulcheria, her two sisters, and a chosen train of favorite damsels, formed a religious community: they denounced the vanity of dress; interrupted, by frequent fasts, their simple and frugal diet; allotted a portion of their time to works of embroidery; and devoted several hours of the day and night to the exercises of prayer and psalmody. The piety of a Christian virgin was adorned by the zeal and liberality of an empress. Ecclesiastical history describes the splendid churches, which were built at the expense of Pulcheria, in all the provinces of the East; her charitable foundations for the benefit of strangers and the poor; the ample donations which she assigned for the perpetual maintenance of monastic societies; and the active severity with which she labored to suppress the opposite heresies of Nestorius and Eutyches. Such virtues were supposed to deserve the peculiar favor of the Deity: and the relics of martyrs, as well as the knowledge of future events, were communicated in visions and revelations to the Imperial saint. Yet the devotion of Pulcheria never diverted her indefatigable attention from temporal affairs; and she alone, among all the descendants of the great Theodosius, appears to have inherited any share of his manly spirit and abilities. The elegant and familiar use which she had acquired, both of the Greek and Latin languages, was readily applied to the various occasions of speaking or writing, on public business: her deliberations were maturely weighed; her actions were prompt and decisive; and, while she moved, without noise or ostentation, the wheel of government, she discreetly attributed to the genius of the emperor the long tranquillity of his reign. In the last years of his peaceful life, Europe was indeed afflicted by the arms of war; but the more extensive provinces of Asia still continued to enjoy a profound and permanent repose. Theodosius the younger was never reduced to the disgraceful necessity of encountering and punishing a rebellious subject: and since we cannot applaud the vigor, some praise may be due to the mildness and prosperity, of the administration of Pulcheria.
But the Romans had been so used to having a monarch that the first member of the Imperial family, even a woman, who showed any courage or capability was allowed to take the empty throne of Theodosius. His sister Pulcheria, just two years older than him, was given the title of Augusta at the age of sixteen; and while her favor might sometimes be affected by whims or political maneuvering, she governed the Eastern empire for nearly forty years—during her brother's long minority and after his death, in her own name and in the name of Marcian, her nominal husband. For reasons of either prudence or faith, she chose a life of celibacy; and despite some rumors about her chastity, this decision, which she shared with her sisters Arcadia and Marina, was celebrated by the Christian community as an impressive act of heroic piety. In front of the clergy and the people, the three daughters of Arcadius dedicated their virginity to God, and the commitment of their solemn vow was inscribed on a gold and gem tablet, which they publicly presented at the great church of Constantinople. Their palace was turned into a monastery; and all males, except for their spiritual guides—saints who had transcended gender—were rigorously excluded from the holy space. Pulcheria, her two sisters, and a select group of favored young women formed a religious community: they criticized the vanity of fashion; interrupted their simple and frugal meals with frequent fasting; spent some of their time on embroidery; and dedicated several hours each day and night to prayer and singing psalms. The devotion of a Christian virgin was enhanced by the zeal and generosity of an empress. Church history records the magnificent churches built at Pulcheria's expense throughout the provinces of the East; her charitable foundations for the support of strangers and the poor; the generous donations she allocated for the ongoing maintenance of monastic communities; and the determined effort with which she worked to suppress the heresies of Nestorius and Eutyches. Such virtues were believed to earn her special favor with God: the relics of martyrs and insights into future events were revealed to the Imperial saint through visions. Yet Pulcheria's devotion never distracted her tireless focus from worldly matters; and she alone, among all the descendants of the great Theodosius, seemed to have inherited some of his strength and talents. Her fluent command of both Greek and Latin was applied effectively when speaking or writing on public matters: her discussions were well thought out; her actions were quick and decisive; and while she quietly and unobtrusively managed the government, she wisely credited the emperor's brilliance for the long peace of his reign. In the later years of his peaceful rule, Europe was afflicted by war; however, the larger provinces in Asia still enjoyed lasting and deep peace. Theodosius the Younger was never put in the embarrassing position of having to confront and punish a rebellious subject: and while we cannot commend his strength, we can acknowledge the gentleness and prosperity of Pulcheria’s administration.
The Roman world was deeply interested in the education of its master. A regular course of study and exercise was judiciously instituted; of the military exercises of riding, and shooting with the bow; of the liberal studies of grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy: the most skilful masters of the East ambitiously solicited the attention of their royal pupil; and several noble youths were introduced into the palace, to animate his diligence by the emulation of friendship. Pulcheria alone discharged the important task of instructing her brother in the arts of government; but her precepts may countenance some suspicions of the extent of her capacity, or of the purity of her intentions. She taught him to maintain a grave and majestic deportment; to walk, to hold his robes, to seat himself on his throne, in a manner worthy of a great prince; to abstain from laughter; to listen with condescension; to return suitable answers; to assume, by turns, a serious or a placid countenance: in a word, to represent with grace and dignity the external figure of a Roman emperor. But Theodosius was never excited to support the weight and glory of an illustrious name: and, instead of aspiring to support his ancestors, he degenerated (if we may presume to measure the degrees of incapacity) below the weakness of his father and his uncle. Arcadius and Honorius had been assisted by the guardian care of a parent, whose lessons were enforced by his authority and example. But the unfortunate prince, who is born in the purple, must remain a stranger to the voice of truth; and the son of Arcadius was condemned to pass his perpetual infancy encompassed only by a servile train of women and eunuchs. The ample leisure which he acquired by neglecting the essential duties of his high office, was filled by idle amusements and unprofitable studies. Hunting was the only active pursuit that could tempt him beyond the limits of the palace; but he most assiduously labored, sometimes by the light of a midnight lamp, in the mechanic occupations of painting and carving; and the elegance with which he transcribed religious books entitled the Roman emperor to the singular epithet of Calligraphes, or a fair writer. Separated from the world by an impenetrable veil, Theodosius trusted the persons whom he loved; he loved those who were accustomed to amuse and flatter his indolence; and as he never perused the papers that were presented for the royal signature, the acts of injustice the most repugnant to his character were frequently perpetrated in his name. The emperor himself was chaste, temperate, liberal, and merciful; but these qualities, which can only deserve the name of virtues when they are supported by courage and regulated by discretion, were seldom beneficial, and they sometimes proved mischievous, to mankind. His mind, enervated by a royal education, was oppressed and degraded by abject superstition: he fasted, he sung psalms, he blindly accepted the miracles and doctrines with which his faith was continually nourished. Theodosius devoutly worshipped the dead and living saints of the Catholic church; and he once refused to eat, till an insolent monk, who had cast an excommunication on his sovereign, condescended to heal the spiritual wound which he had inflicted.
The Roman world was very focused on educating its ruler. A structured program of study and exercise was carefully designed, including military training in riding and archery, as well as liberal arts like grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy. The best teachers from the East eagerly sought to engage their royal student, and several noble youths were brought into the palace to encourage his hard work through friendship and competition. Pulcheria took on the significant responsibility of teaching her brother the skills needed for governance; however, her teachings might raise some doubts about her abilities or intentions. She taught him to maintain a serious and dignified demeanor, to walk and hold his robes with poise, to sit on his throne like a true prince, to refrain from laughter, to listen graciously, to respond appropriately, and to alternate between a serious and calm expression: in short, to represent with elegance and dignity the outward appearance of a Roman emperor. However, Theodosius was never motivated to bear the weight and glory of such a notable legacy. Instead of trying to uphold his family's reputation, he fell short (if we can gauge incapacity) of the weaknesses of both his father and uncle. Arcadius and Honorius had the supportive guidance of a father, whose lessons were reinforced by his authority and example. But the unfortunate prince, born into royalty, was mostly kept away from the truth; the son of Arcadius was condemned to live in a perpetual state of childhood, surrounded only by a subservient group of women and eunuchs. The significant free time he gained by neglecting his critical responsibilities was filled with trivial pastimes and unhelpful studies. Hunting was the only active endeavor that could draw him outside the palace, but he also spent many late nights engaged in the arts of painting and carving. He became so skilled at copying religious texts that he earned the unique title of Calligraphes, or fair writer. Isolated from the world by an impenetrable barrier, Theodosius placed his trust in those he cared about; he loved those who catered to his complacency and flattered his idleness. Since he never read the documents presented for his royal approval, acts of injustice that clashed with his character were often committed in his name. The emperor himself was chaste, moderate, generous, and compassionate; however, these traits, which only deserve to be called virtues when backed by courage and guided by sound judgment, were rarely helpful and sometimes even harmful to people. His mind, weakened by his royal upbringing, was burdened and diminished by extreme superstition: he fasted, sang psalms, and blindly accepted the miracles and teachings that his faith constantly fed him. Theodosius worshipped both dead and living saints of the Catholic Church, and at one point, he even refused to eat until an arrogant monk, who had placed a curse on him, agreed to mend the spiritual harm he had caused.
The story of a fair and virtuous maiden, exalted from a private condition to the Imperial throne, might be deemed an incredible romance, if such a romance had not been verified in the marriage of Theodosius. The celebrated Athenais was educated by her father Leontius in the religion and sciences of the Greeks; and so advantageous was the opinion which the Athenian philosopher entertained of his contemporaries, that he divided his patrimony between his two sons, bequeathing to his daughter a small legacy of one hundred pieces of gold, in the lively confidence that her beauty and merit would be a sufficient portion. The jealousy and avarice of her brothers soon compelled Athenais to seek a refuge at Constantinople; and, with some hopes, either of justice or favor, to throw herself at the feet of Pulcheria. That sagacious princess listened to her eloquent complaint; and secretly destined the daughter of the philosopher Leontius for the future wife of the emperor of the East, who had now attained the twentieth year of his age. She easily excited the curiosity of her brother, by an interesting picture of the charms of Athenais; large eyes, a well-proportioned nose, a fair complexion, golden locks, a slender person, a graceful demeanor, an understanding improved by study, and a virtue tried by distress. Theodosius, concealed behind a curtain in the apartment of his sister, was permitted to behold the Athenian virgin: the modest youth immediately declared his pure and honorable love; and the royal nuptials were celebrated amidst the acclamations of the capital and the provinces. Athenais, who was easily persuaded to renounce the errors of Paganism, received at her baptism the Christian name of Eudocia; but the cautious Pulcheria withheld the title of Augusta, till the wife of Theodosius had approved her fruitfulness by the birth of a daughter, who espoused, fifteen years afterwards, the emperor of the West. The brothers of Eudocia obeyed, with some anxiety, her Imperial summons; but as she could easily forgive their unfortunate unkindness, she indulged the tenderness, or perhaps the vanity, of a sister, by promoting them to the rank of consuls and præfects. In the luxury of the palace, she still cultivated those ingenuous arts which had contributed to her greatness; and wisely dedicated her talents to the honor of religion, and of her husband. Eudocia composed a poetical paraphrase of the first eight books of the Old Testament, and of the prophecies of Daniel and Zechariah; a cento of the verses of Homer, applied to the life and miracles of Christ, the legend of St. Cyprian, and a panegyric on the Persian victories of Theodosius; and her writings, which were applauded by a servile and superstitious age, have not been disdained by the candor of impartial criticism. The fondness of the emperor was not abated by time and possession; and Eudocia, after the marriage of her daughter, was permitted to discharge her grateful vows by a solemn pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Her ostentatious progress through the East may seem inconsistent with the spirit of Christian humility; she pronounced, from a throne of gold and gems, an eloquent oration to the senate of Antioch, declared her royal intention of enlarging the walls of the city, bestowed a donative of two hundred pounds of gold to restore the public baths, and accepted the statues, which were decreed by the gratitude of Antioch. In the Holy Land, her alms and pious foundations exceeded the munificence of the great Helena, and though the public treasure might be impoverished by this excessive liberality, she enjoyed the conscious satisfaction of returning to Constantinople with the chains of St. Peter, the right arm of St. Stephen, and an undoubted picture of the Virgin, painted by St. Luke. But this pilgrimage was the fatal term of the glories of Eudocia. Satiated with empty pomp, and unmindful, perhaps, of her obligations to Pulcheria, she ambitiously aspired to the government of the Eastern empire; the palace was distracted by female discord; but the victory was at last decided, by the superior ascendant of the sister of Theodosius. The execution of Paulinus, master of the offices, and the disgrace of Cyrus, Prætorian præfect of the East, convinced the public that the favor of Eudocia was insufficient to protect her most faithful friends; and the uncommon beauty of Paulinus encouraged the secret rumor, that his guilt was that of a successful lover. As soon as the empress perceived that the affection of Theodosius was irretrievably lost, she requested the permission of retiring to the distant solitude of Jerusalem. She obtained her request; but the jealousy of Theodosius, or the vindictive spirit of Pulcheria, pursued her in her last retreat; and Saturninus, count of the domestics, was directed to punish with death two ecclesiastics, her most favored servants. Eudocia instantly revenged them by the assassination of the count; the furious passions which she indulged on this suspicious occasion, seemed to justify the severity of Theodosius; and the empress, ignominiously stripped of the honors of her rank, was disgraced, perhaps unjustly, in the eyes of the world. The remainder of the life of Eudocia, about sixteen years, was spent in exile and devotion; and the approach of age, the death of Theodosius, the misfortunes of her only daughter, who was led a captive from Rome to Carthage, and the society of the Holy Monks of Palestine, insensibly confirmed the religious temper of her mind. After a full experience of the vicissitudes of human life, the daughter of the philosopher Leontius expired, at Jerusalem, in the sixty-seventh year of her age; protesting, with her dying breath, that she had never transgressed the bounds of innocence and friendship.
The tale of a fair and virtuous young woman, raised from modest beginnings to the Imperial throne, might seem like an incredible romance, if it weren't for the real-life example of Theodosius's marriage. The well-known Athenais was taught by her father, Leontius, in the beliefs and sciences of the Greeks; so highly did the Athenian philosopher regard his contemporaries that he divided his inheritance between his two sons, leaving his daughter a small legacy of one hundred gold coins, confident that her beauty and character would be enough for her. The jealousy and greed of her brothers soon forced Athenais to seek safety in Constantinople, hoping to find either justice or favor by appealing to Pulcheria. That clever princess listened to her heartfelt complaint and secretly planned for Leontius's daughter to become the future wife of the Eastern emperor, who had just turned twenty. She piqued her brother's curiosity by painting a vivid picture of Athenais's charms: large eyes, a well-shaped nose, a fair complexion, golden hair, a slender figure, graceful demeanor, an intellect honed by study, and a virtue refined through hardship. Theodosius, hiding behind a curtain in his sister's room, was allowed to see the Athenian maiden; the shy young man quickly expressed his pure and honorable love, and their royal wedding was celebrated amid cheers from the capital and the provinces. Athenais, easily convinced to abandon the beliefs of Paganism, received the Christian name Eudocia at her baptism; however, the careful Pulcheria held off granting her the title of Augusta until Theodosius's wife had proven her fertility by giving birth to a daughter, who would marry the emperor of the West fifteen years later. Eudocia's brothers complied, albeit nervously, with her Imperial summons; but since she could easily forgive their past unkindness, she indulged the affection, or possibly the pride, of a sister by promoting them to consuls and prefects. In the luxury of the palace, she continued to nurture the arts that had aided her rise; wisely dedicating her talents to honoring her religion and her husband. Eudocia created a poetic retelling of the first eight books of the Old Testament and the prophecies of Daniel and Zechariah; a collection of verses from Homer, applied to the life and miracles of Christ, the legend of St. Cyprian, and a eulogy for Theodosius's victories over the Persians; her works, celebrated by a subservient and superstitious age, have not been looked down upon by fair criticism. The emperor's affection for her didn't fade over time; after her daughter's marriage, Eudocia was allowed to fulfill her grateful vows with a grand pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Her extravagant journey through the East might seem at odds with the spirit of Christian humility; she delivered an eloquent speech to the senate of Antioch from a throne of gold and gems, announced her royal plan to expand the city's walls, donated two hundred pounds of gold to renovate the public baths, and accepted statues awarded by Antioch's gratitude. In the Holy Land, her charity and religious foundations surpassed the generosity of the great Helena, and although her excessive giving might have depleted the public treasury, she returned to Constantinople with the chains of St. Peter, the right arm of St. Stephen, and a genuine portrait of the Virgin, painted by St. Luke. However, this pilgrimage marked the beginning of Eudocia's downfall. Perhaps weighed down by empty splendor and forgetful of her obligations to Pulcheria, she ambitiously sought control of the Eastern empire; the palace fell into female conflict, yet victory ultimately rested with Theodosius's sister. The execution of Paulinus, head of the offices, and the disgrace of Cyrus, the Praetorian prefect of the East, showed the public that Eudocia's favor could not safeguard even her closest allies; and the extraordinary beauty of Paulinus fueled gossip that his real offense was being an attractive lover. Once the empress realized she had irretrievably lost Theodosius's affection, she requested to retire to the distant solitude of Jerusalem. Her request was granted; but the jealousy of Theodosius, or Pulcheria's vengeful nature, followed her to her retreat, and Saturninus, the head of the household troops, was ordered to execute two of her favored servants. Eudocia quickly avenged them by assassinating the count; the intense feelings she displayed during this suspicious event seemed to validate Theodosius's harshness, and the empress, disgracefully stripped of her titles, was possibly unjustly shamed in the eyes of the world. Eudocia spent the last sixteen years of her life in exile and devotion, and as she aged, with Theodosius's death and the troubles of her only daughter, who was taken captive from Rome to Carthage, along with the companionship of the Holy Monks of Palestine, the religious character of her mind deepened. After fully experiencing life's ups and downs, the philosopher Leontius's daughter passed away in Jerusalem at sixty-seven, declaring with her last breath that she had never crossed the lines of innocence and friendship.
The gentle mind of Theodosius was never inflamed by the ambition of conquest, or military renown; and the slight alarm of a Persian war scarcely interrupted the tranquillity of the East. The motives of this war were just and honorable. In the last year of the reign of Jezdegerd, the supposed guardian of Theodosius, a bishop, who aspired to the crown of martyrdom, destroyed one of the fire-temples of Susa. His zeal and obstinacy were revenged on his brethren: the Magi excited a cruel persecution; and the intolerant zeal of Jezdegerd was imitated by his son Varanes, or Bahram, who soon afterwards ascended the throne. Some Christian fugitives, who escaped to the Roman frontier, were sternly demanded, and generously refused; and the refusal, aggravated by commercial disputes, soon kindled a war between the rival monarchies. The mountains of Armenia, and the plains of Mesopotamia, were filled with hostile armies; but the operations of two successive campaigns were not productive of any decisive or memorable events. Some engagements were fought, some towns were besieged, with various and doubtful success: and if the Romans failed in their attempt to recover the long-lost possession of Nisibis, the Persians were repulsed from the walls of a Mesopotamian city, by the valor of a martial bishop, who pointed his thundering engine in the name of St. Thomas the Apostle. Yet the splendid victories which the incredible speed of the messenger Palladius repeatedly announced to the palace of Constantinople, were celebrated with festivals and panegyrics. From these panegyrics the historians of the age might borrow their extraordinary, and, perhaps, fabulous tales; of the proud challenge of a Persian hero, who was entangled by the net, and despatched by the sword, of Areobindus the Goth; of the ten thousand Immortals, who were slain in the attack of the Roman camp; and of the hundred thousand Arabs, or Saracens, who were impelled by a panic terror to throw themselves headlong into the Euphrates. Such events may be disbelieved or disregarded; but the charity of a bishop, Acacius of Amida, whose name might have dignified the saintly calendar, shall not be lost in oblivion. Boldly declaring, that vases of gold and silver are useless to a God who neither eats nor drinks, the generous prelate sold the plate of the church of Amida; employed the price in the redemption of seven thousand Persian captives; supplied their wants with affectionate liberality; and dismissed them to their native country, to inform their king of the true spirit of the religion which he persecuted. The practice of benevolence in the midst of war must always tend to assuage the animosity of contending nations; and I wish to persuade myself, that Acacius contributed to the restoration of peace. In the conference which was held on the limits of the two empires, the Roman ambassadors degraded the personal character of their sovereign, by a vain attempt to magnify the extent of his power; when they seriously advised the Persians to prevent, by a timely accommodation, the wrath of a monarch, who was yet ignorant of this distant war. A truce of one hundred years was solemnly ratified; and although the revolutions of Armenia might threaten the public tranquillity, the essential conditions of this treaty were respected near fourscore years by the successors of Constantine and Artaxerxes.
The gentle mind of Theodosius was never driven by a desire for conquest or military fame, and the minor threat of a Persian war hardly disturbed the peace of the East. The reasons for this war were fair and honorable. In the final year of Jezdegerd's reign, the supposed protector of Theodosius, a bishop who sought the crown of martyrdom, destroyed one of the fire temples in Susa. His enthusiasm and stubbornness led to retaliation against his fellow Christians: the Magi incited a brutal persecution, and the intolerant fervor of Jezdegerd was emulated by his son Varanes, or Bahram, who soon took the throne. Some Christian refugees who fled to the Roman border were firmly demanded and generously refused; their refusal, worsened by trade disputes, quickly ignited a war between the rival kingdoms. The mountains of Armenia and the plains of Mesopotamia were filled with opposing armies, but the actions of two consecutive campaigns did not lead to any decisive or notable outcomes. Some battles were fought, some cities were besieged, with mixed and uncertain results: while the Romans failed to reclaim the long-lost city of Nisibis, the Persians were driven back from the walls of a Mesopotamian city by the courage of a military bishop, who launched his powerful weapon in the name of St. Thomas the Apostle. Yet the magnificent victories reported with incredible speed by the messenger Palladius were celebrated with festivals and praise. From these praises, the historians of the time might have drawn their extraordinary, and perhaps fictional, stories; of a proud Persian hero who got caught in a net and was killed by the sword of Areobindus the Goth; of the ten thousand Immortals who were defeated in an attack on the Roman camp; and of the hundred thousand Arabs, or Saracens, who in a panic plunged themselves into the Euphrates. Such stories may be doubted or ignored; however, the kindness of a bishop, Acacius of Amida, whose name could have graced the saintly calendar, should not be forgotten. Boldly stating that gold and silver vases are useless to a God who neither eats nor drinks, the generous bishop sold the church's silverware; he used the money to redeem seven thousand Persian captives, met their needs with loving generosity, and sent them back to their homeland to inform their king of the true nature of the religion he was persecuting. Practicing kindness amidst war should always help ease the hostility between warring nations; and I wish to believe that Acacius played a role in restoring peace. In the discussions held on the borders of the two empires, the Roman ambassadors undermined their sovereign's character by foolishly trying to exaggerate his power, when they seriously advised the Persians to prevent, through timely negotiation, the anger of a monarch who was still unaware of this distant conflict. A truce of one hundred years was formally established; and although changes in Armenia could threaten public peace, the key terms of this treaty were respected for nearly eighty years by the successors of Constantine and Artaxerxes.
Since the Roman and Parthian standards first encountered on the banks of the Euphrates, the kingdom of Armenia was alternately oppressed by its formidable protectors; and in the course of this History, several events, which inclined the balance of peace and war, have been already related. A disgraceful treaty had resigned Armenia to the ambition of Sapor; and the scale of Persia appeared to preponderate. But the royal race of Arsaces impatiently submitted to the house of Sassan; the turbulent nobles asserted, or betrayed, their hereditary independence; and the nation was still attached to the Christian princes of Constantinople. In the beginning of the fifth century, Armenia was divided by the progress of war and faction; and the unnatural division precipitated the downfall of that ancient monarchy. Chosroes, the Persian vassal, reigned over the Eastern and most extensive portion of the country; while the Western province acknowledged the jurisdiction of Arsaces, and the supremacy of the emperor Arcadius. After the death of Arsaces, the Romans suppressed the regal government, and imposed on their allies the condition of subjects. The military command was delegated to the count of the Armenian frontier; the city of Theodosiopolis was built and fortified in a strong situation, on a fertile and lofty ground, near the sources of the Euphrates; and the dependent territories were ruled by five satraps, whose dignity was marked by a peculiar habit of gold and purple. The less fortunate nobles, who lamented the loss of their king, and envied the honors of their equals, were provoked to negotiate their peace and pardon at the Persian court; and returning, with their followers, to the palace of Artaxata, acknowledged Chosroes for their lawful sovereign. About thirty years afterwards, Artasires, the nephew and successor of Chosroes, fell under the displeasure of the haughty and capricious nobles of Armenia; and they unanimously desired a Persian governor in the room of an unworthy king. The answer of the archbishop Isaac, whose sanction they earnestly solicited, is expressive of the character of a superstitious people. He deplored the manifest and inexcusable vices of Artasires; and declared, that he should not hesitate to accuse him before the tribunal of a Christian emperor, who would punish, without destroying, the sinner. "Our king," continued Isaac, "is too much addicted to licentious pleasures, but he has been purified in the holy waters of baptism. He is a lover of women, but he does not adore the fire or the elements. He may deserve the reproach of lewdness, but he is an undoubted Catholic; and his faith is pure, though his manners are flagitious. I will never consent to abandon my sheep to the rage of devouring wolves; and you would soon repent your rash exchange of the infirmities of a believer, for the specious virtues of a heathen." Exasperated by the firmness of Isaac, the factious nobles accused both the king and the archbishop as the secret adherents of the emperor; and absurdly rejoiced in the sentence of condemnation, which, after a partial hearing, was solemnly pronounced by Bahram himself. The descendants of Arsaces were degraded from the royal dignity, which they had possessed above five hundred and sixty years; and the dominions of the unfortunate Artasires, under the new and significant appellation of Persarmenia, were reduced into the form of a province. This usurpation excited the jealousy of the Roman government; but the rising disputes were soon terminated by an amicable, though unequal, partition of the ancient kingdom of Armenia: and a territorial acquisition, which Augustus might have despised, reflected some lustre on the declining empire of the younger Theodosius.
Since the Roman and Parthian standards first met on the banks of the Euphrates, the kingdom of Armenia has been repeatedly oppressed by its powerful protectors. Throughout this history, several events that tilted the balance between peace and war have already been described. A shameful treaty had turned Armenia over to Sapor's ambition, and it seemed that Persia had the upper hand. However, the royal lineage of Arsaces reluctantly submitted to the Sassanian dynasty; the rebellious nobles either asserted or betrayed their long-held independence; and the nation remained loyal to the Christian rulers of Constantinople. In the early fifth century, Armenia was torn apart by war and internal conflict, and this unnatural division hastened the collapse of the ancient monarchy. Chosroes, the Persian vassal, ruled over the eastern and largest part of the country, while the western province recognized Arsaces's authority and the supremacy of Emperor Arcadius. After Arsaces's death, the Romans abolished the royal government and imposed the status of subjects on their allies. Military command was handed over to the count of the Armenian frontier; the city of Theodosiopolis was built and fortified in a strong position on fertile and elevated ground near the Euphrates’s source; and the dependent regions were governed by five satraps, marked by their distinctive attire of gold and purple. The less fortunate nobles, mourning their lost king and envying their peers' honors, were driven to seek peace and forgiveness at the Persian court; upon returning with their followers to the palace of Artaxata, they acknowledged Chosroes as their rightful sovereign. About thirty years later, Artasires, the nephew and successor of Chosroes, fell out of favor with the arrogant and unpredictable Armenian nobles, who unitedly sought a Persian governor instead of their unworthy king. The response of Archbishop Isaac, whose approval they urgently sought, reflects the mindset of a superstitious people. He lamented Artasires's obvious and inexcusable vices and stated that he would not hesitate to accuse him before the tribunal of a Christian emperor, who would punish the sinner without destroying him. "Our king," Isaac continued, "is too devoted to indulgent pleasures, but he has been cleansed in the holy waters of baptism. He loves women, but he doesn't worship fire or the elements. He may deserve accusations of immorality, but he is undoubtedly a Catholic, and his faith is pure, even if his behavior is disgraceful. I will never agree to abandon my flock to the rage of devouring wolves; you would soon regret your reckless trade of a believer's shortcomings for the deceptive virtues of a pagan." Frustrated by Isaac's resolve, the factional nobles accused both the king and the archbishop as secret supporters of the emperor and foolishly rejoiced at the condemnation, which Bahram himself pronounced after a biased hearing. The descendants of Arsaces were stripped of the royal dignity they had held for over five hundred sixty years; and the realm of the unfortunate Artasires, rebranded as Persarmenia, was reduced to a province. This takeover stirred the jealousy of the Roman government, but the emerging disputes were soon resolved through an amicable, though unequal, division of the ancient kingdom of Armenia, and a territorial gain that Augustus might have dismissed brought some recognition to the declining empire of the younger Theodosius.
Chapter XXXIII: Conquest Of Africa By The Vandals.—Part I.
Death Of Honorius.—Valentinian III.—Emperor Of The East.— Administration Of His Mother Placidia—Ætius And Boniface.— Conquest Of Africa By The Vandals.
Death of Honorius.—Valentinian III.—Emperor of the East.— Administration of His Mother Placidia—Ætius and Boniface.— Conquest of Africa by the Vandals.
During a long and disgraceful reign of twenty-eight years, Honorius, emperor of the West, was separated from the friendship of his brother, and afterwards of his nephew, who reigned over the East; and Constantinople beheld, with apparent indifference and secret joy, the calamities of Rome. The strange adventures of Placidia gradually renewed and cemented the alliance of the two empires. The daughter of the great Theodosius had been the captive, and the queen, of the Goths; she lost an affectionate husband; she was dragged in chains by his insulting assassin; she tasted the pleasure of revenge, and was exchanged, in the treaty of peace, for six hundred thousand measures of wheat. After her return from Spain to Italy, Placidia experienced a new persecution in the bosom of her family. She was averse to a marriage, which had been stipulated without her consent; and the brave Constantius, as a noble reward for the tyrants whom he had vanquished, received, from the hand of Honorius himself, the struggling and the reluctant hand of the widow of Adolphus. But her resistance ended with the ceremony of the nuptials: nor did Placidia refuse to become the mother of Honoria and Valentinian the Third, or to assume and exercise an absolute dominion over the mind of her grateful husband. The generous soldier, whose time had hitherto been divided between social pleasure and military service, was taught new lessons of avarice and ambition: he extorted the title of Augustus: and the servant of Honorius was associated to the empire of the West. The death of Constantius, in the seventh month of his reign, instead of diminishing, seemed to increase the power of Placidia; and the indecent familiarity of her brother, which might be no more than the symptoms of a childish affection, were universally attributed to incestuous love. On a sudden, by some base intrigues of a steward and a nurse, this excessive fondness was converted into an irreconcilable quarrel: the debates of the emperor and his sister were not long confined within the walls of the palace; and as the Gothic soldiers adhered to their queen, the city of Ravenna was agitated with bloody and dangerous tumults, which could only be appeased by the forced or voluntary retreat of Placidia and her children. The royal exiles landed at Constantinople, soon after the marriage of Theodosius, during the festival of the Persian victories. They were treated with kindness and magnificence; but as the statues of the emperor Constantius had been rejected by the Eastern court, the title of Augusta could not decently be allowed to his widow. Within a few months after the arrival of Placidia, a swift messenger announced the death of Honorius, the consequence of a dropsy; but the important secret was not divulged, till the necessary orders had been despatched for the march of a large body of troops to the sea-coast of Dalmatia. The shops and the gates of Constantinople remained shut during seven days; and the loss of a foreign prince, who could neither be esteemed nor regretted, was celebrated with loud and affected demonstrations of the public grief.
During a long and shameful reign of twenty-eight years, Honorius, the emperor of the West, became estranged from the friendship of his brother, and later from his nephew, who ruled over the East. Constantinople watched with seeming indifference and hidden pleasure as Rome faced its misfortunes. The strange experiences of Placidia gradually renewed and strengthened the alliance between the two empires. The daughter of the great Theodosius had been a captive and the queen of the Goths; she lost a loving husband and was dragged in chains by his cruel assassin. She tasted the satisfaction of revenge and was exchanged, in a peace treaty, for six hundred thousand measures of wheat. After returning from Spain to Italy, Placidia faced new struggles within her family. She was opposed to a marriage arranged without her consent, and the brave Constantius, as a noble reward for the tyrants he had defeated, received from Honorius himself the reluctant hand of the widow of Adolphus. However, her resistance ended with the wedding ceremony; Placidia also accepted her role as the mother of Honoria and Valentinian the Third and took control over her grateful husband’s mind. The noble soldier, who had previously divided his time between social enjoyment and military duty, learned new lessons of greed and ambition: he claimed the title of Augustus, and Honorius's servant was made part of the Western empire. The death of Constantius, seven months into his reign, instead of reducing Placidia's power, seemed to amplify it. The inappropriate closeness of her brother, perhaps just signs of childish affection, was widely interpreted as incestuous love. Suddenly, through some deceitful schemes of a steward and a nurse, this excessive affection turned into a bitter conflict: the arguments between the emperor and his sister quickly spilled beyond the palace walls. As the Gothic soldiers supported their queen, the city of Ravenna erupted into bloody and dangerous riots, only calming down through the forced or voluntary retreat of Placidia and her children. The royal exiles arrived in Constantinople shortly after Theodosius's marriage, during the celebrations of the Persian victories. They were treated with kindness and grandeur, but since the statue of Emperor Constantius had been rejected by the Eastern court, the title of Augusta could not properly be given to his widow. A few months after Placidia's arrival, a swift messenger brought news of Honorius's death, caused by dropsy; however, this important information was kept secret until the necessary orders were sent for a large troop march to the coast of Dalmatia. The shops and gates of Constantinople stayed closed for seven days, and the loss of a foreign prince, who could not be esteemed or missed, was marked by loud and exaggerated displays of public mourning.
While the ministers of Constantinople deliberated, the vacant throne of Honorius was usurped by the ambition of a stranger. The name of the rebel was John; he filled the confidential office of Primicerius, or principal secretary, and history has attributed to his character more virtues, than can easily be reconciled with the violation of the most sacred duty. Elated by the submission of Italy, and the hope of an alliance with the Huns, John presumed to insult, by an embassy, the majesty of the Eastern emperor; but when he understood that his agents had been banished, imprisoned, and at length chased away with deserved ignominy, John prepared to assert, by arms, the injustice of his claims. In such a cause, the grandson of the great Theodosius should have marched in person: but the young emperor was easily diverted, by his physicians, from so rash and hazardous a design; and the conduct of the Italian expedition was prudently intrusted to Ardaburius, and his son Aspar, who had already signalized their valor against the Persians. It was resolved, that Ardaburius should embark with the infantry; whilst Aspar, at the head of the cavalry, conducted Placidia and her son Valentinian along the sea-coast of the Adriatic. The march of the cavalry was performed with such active diligence, that they surprised, without resistance, the important city of Aquileia: when the hopes of Aspar were unexpectedly confounded by the intelligence, that a storm had dispersed the Imperial fleet; and that his father, with only two galleys, was taken and carried a prisoner into the port of Ravenna. Yet this incident, unfortunate as it might seem, facilitated the conquest of Italy. Ardaburius employed, or abused, the courteous freedom which he was permitted to enjoy, to revive among the troops a sense of loyalty and gratitude; and as soon as the conspiracy was ripe for execution, he invited, by private messages, and pressed the approach of, Aspar. A shepherd, whom the popular credulity transformed into an angel, guided the eastern cavalry by a secret, and, it was thought, an impassable road, through the morasses of the Po: the gates of Ravenna, after a short struggle, were thrown open; and the defenceless tyrant was delivered to the mercy, or rather to the cruelty, of the conquerors. His right hand was first cut off; and, after he had been exposed, mounted on an ass, to the public derision, John was beheaded in the circus of Aquileia. The emperor Theodosius, when he received the news of the victory, interrupted the horse-races; and singing, as he marched through the streets, a suitable psalm, conducted his people from the Hippodrome to the church, where he spent the remainder of the day in grateful devotion.
While the ministers of Constantinople discussed matters, the empty throne of Honorius was taken over by the ambitions of an outsider. The rebel was named John; he held the important position of Primicerius, or chief secretary, and history has credited him with more virtues than can easily be reconciled with his betrayal of a sacred duty. Buoyed by the submission of Italy and the hope of an alliance with the Huns, John dared to insult the dignity of the Eastern emperor through an embassy; but when he learned that his envoys had been banished, imprisoned, and ultimately chased away in disgrace, John prepared to defend his claims with force. In such a matter, the grandson of the great Theodosius should have taken the lead himself: but the young emperor was easily dissuaded by his advisors from such a reckless and dangerous course; so, the Italian campaign was wisely entrusted to Ardaburius and his son Aspar, both of whom had already proven their bravery against the Persians. They decided that Ardaburius would set sail with the infantry, while Aspar would lead the cavalry and escort Placidia and her son Valentinian along the Adriatic coastline. The cavalry marched with such speed that they captured the key city of Aquileia without a fight. However, Aspar's hopes were unexpectedly dashed by news that a storm had scattered the Imperial fleet, and that his father, with just two galleys, had been captured and taken as a prisoner to the port of Ravenna. Yet this seemingly unfortunate incident actually made it easier to conquer Italy. Ardaburius took advantage of the friendly atmosphere he was allowed to enjoy to reignite a sense of loyalty and gratitude among the troops; and as soon as the conspiracy was ready to be put into action, he privately messaged and urged Aspar to come closer. A shepherd, believed by the gullible to be an angel, guided the Eastern cavalry through a secret and supposedly impassable route across the marshes of the Po: the gates of Ravenna were opened after a brief struggle, and the defenseless tyrant was delivered to the mercy—or rather the brutality—of his conquerors. His right hand was the first to be severed; and after being paraded on an ass for public humiliation, John was executed in the circus of Aquileia. When Emperor Theodosius received the news of the victory, he interrupted the horse races and, singing a fitting psalm as he walked through the streets, led his people from the Hippodrome to the church, where he spent the rest of the day in thankful devotion.
In a monarchy, which, according to various precedents, might be considered as elective, or hereditary, or patrimonial, it was impossible that the intricate claims of female and collateral succession should be clearly defined; and Theodosius, by the right of consanguinity or conquest, might have reigned the sole legitimate emperor of the Romans. For a moment, perhaps, his eyes were dazzled by the prospect of unbounded sway; but his indolent temper gradually acquiesced in the dictates of sound policy. He contented himself with the possession of the East; and wisely relinquished the laborious task of waging a distant and doubtful war against the Barbarians beyond the Alps; or of securing the obedience of the Italians and Africans, whose minds were alienated by the irreconcilable difference of language and interest. Instead of listening to the voice of ambition, Theodosius resolved to imitate the moderation of his grandfather, and to seat his cousin Valentinian on the throne of the West. The royal infant was distinguished at Constantinople by the title of Nobilissimus: he was promoted, before his departure from Thessalonica, to the rank and dignity of Cæsar; and after the conquest of Italy, the patrician Helion, by the authority of Theodosius, and in the presence of the senate, saluted Valentinian the Third by the name of Augustus, and solemnly invested him with the diadem and the Imperial purple. By the agreement of the three females who governed the Roman world, the son of Placidia was betrothed to Eudoxia, the daughter of Theodosius and Athenais; and as soon as the lover and his bride had attained the age of puberty, this honorable alliance was faithfully accomplished. At the same time, as a compensation, perhaps, for the expenses of the war, the Western Illyricum was detached from the Italian dominions, and yielded to the throne of Constantinople. The emperor of the East acquired the useful dominion of the rich and maritime province of Dalmatia, and the dangerous sovereignty of Pannonia and Noricum, which had been filled and ravaged above twenty years by a promiscuous crowd of Huns, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Bavarians. Theodosius and Valentinian continued to respect the obligations of their public and domestic alliance; but the unity of the Roman government was finally dissolved. By a positive declaration, the validity of all future laws was limited to the dominions of their peculiar author; unless he should think proper to communicate them, subscribed with his own hand, for the approbation of his independent colleague.
In a monarchy, which could be seen as either elective, hereditary, or patrimonial based on various precedents, it was impossible to clearly define the complex claims of female and collateral succession. Theodosius, through blood relation or conquest, could have claimed to be the sole legitimate emperor of the Romans. For a moment, he might have been tempted by the idea of absolute power, but his laid-back nature eventually accepted the wisdom of sound policy. He settled for control of the East and wisely stepped back from the difficult challenge of fighting a distant and uncertain war against the Barbarians beyond the Alps, as well as from trying to enforce loyalty among the Italians and Africans, who were divided by different languages and interests. Instead of giving in to ambition, Theodosius chose to follow the moderate approach of his grandfather and put his cousin Valentinian on the throne of the West. The young prince was recognized at Constantinople with the title of Nobilissimus; before leaving Thessalonica, he was elevated to the rank and title of Cæsar; and after conquering Italy, the patrician Helion, under Theodosius's authority and in front of the Senate, declared Valentinian the Third as Augustus and formally dressed him in the diadem and the Imperial purple. By agreement among the three women who ruled the Roman world, Placidia’s son was engaged to Eudoxia, the daughter of Theodosius and Athenais; and once the couple reached puberty, this honorable union was duly finalized. At the same time, possibly as compensation for the war expenses, the Western Illyricum was separated from Italian control and given to the throne of Constantinople. The Eastern emperor gained control of the wealthy coastal province of Dalmatia and the challenging rule over Pannonia and Noricum, which had been overrun and devastated for over twenty years by a mix of Huns, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Bavarians. Theodosius and Valentinian continued to honor their public and family commitments, but the unity of the Roman government was ultimately broken. A formal declaration limited the validity of all future laws to the domains of their specific author, unless he decided to share them, signed by his own hand, for approval from his independent colleague.
Valentinian, when he received the title of Augustus, was no more than six years of age; and his long minority was intrusted to the guardian care of a mother, who might assert a female claim to the succession of the Western empire. Placidia envied, but she could not equal, the reputation and virtues of the wife and sister of Theodosius, the elegant genius of Eudocia, the wise and successful policy of Pulcheria. The mother of Valentinian was jealous of the power which she was incapable of exercising; she reigned twenty-five years, in the name of her son; and the character of that unworthy emperor gradually countenanced the suspicion that Placidia had enervated his youth by a dissolute education, and studiously diverted his attention from every manly and honorable pursuit. Amidst the decay of military spirit, her armies were commanded by two generals, Ætius and Boniface, who may be deservedly named as the last of the Romans. Their union might have supported a sinking empire; their discord was the fatal and immediate cause of the loss of Africa. The invasion and defeat of Attila have immortalized the fame of Ætius; and though time has thrown a shade over the exploits of his rival, the defence of Marseilles, and the deliverance of Africa, attest the military talents of Count Boniface. In the field of battle, in partial encounters, in single combats, he was still the terror of the Barbarians: the clergy, and particularly his friend Augustin, were edified by the Christian piety which had once tempted him to retire from the world; the people applauded his spotless integrity; the army dreaded his equal and inexorable justice, which may be displayed in a very singular example. A peasant, who complained of the criminal intimacy between his wife and a Gothic soldier, was directed to attend his tribunal the following day: in the evening the count, who had diligently informed himself of the time and place of the assignation, mounted his horse, rode ten miles into the country, surprised the guilty couple, punished the soldier with instant death, and silenced the complaints of the husband by presenting him, the next morning, with the head of the adulterer. The abilities of Ætius and Boniface might have been usefully employed against the public enemies, in separate and important commands; but the experience of their past conduct should have decided the real favor and confidence of the empress Placidia. In the melancholy season of her exile and distress, Boniface alone had maintained her cause with unshaken fidelity: and the troops and treasures of Africa had essentially contributed to extinguish the rebellion. The same rebellion had been supported by the zeal and activity of Ætius, who brought an army of sixty thousand Huns from the Danube to the confines of Italy, for the service of the usurper. The untimely death of John compelled him to accept an advantageous treaty; but he still continued, the subject and the soldier of Valentinian, to entertain a secret, perhaps a treasonable, correspondence with his Barbarian allies, whose retreat had been purchased by liberal gifts, and more liberal promises. But Ætius possessed an advantage of singular moment in a female reign; he was present: he besieged, with artful and assiduous flattery, the palace of Ravenna; disguised his dark designs with the mask of loyalty and friendship; and at length deceived both his mistress and his absent rival, by a subtle conspiracy, which a weak woman and a brave man could not easily suspect. He had secretly persuaded Placidia to recall Boniface from the government of Africa; he secretly advised Boniface to disobey the Imperial summons: to the one, he represented the order as a sentence of death; to the other, he stated the refusal as a signal of revolt; and when the credulous and unsuspectful count had armed the province in his defence, Ætius applauded his sagacity in foreseeing the rebellion, which his own perfidy had excited. A temperate inquiry into the real motives of Boniface would have restored a faithful servant to his duty and to the republic; but the arts of Ætius still continued to betray and to inflame, and the count was urged, by persecution, to embrace the most desperate counsels. The success with which he eluded or repelled the first attacks, could not inspire a vain confidence, that at the head of some loose, disorderly Africans, he should be able to withstand the regular forces of the West, commanded by a rival, whose military character it was impossible for him to despise. After some hesitation, the last struggles of prudence and loyalty, Boniface despatched a trusty friend to the court, or rather to the camp, of Gonderic, king of the Vandals, with the proposal of a strict alliance, and the offer of an advantageous and perpetual settlement.
Valentinian became Augustus when he was only six years old, and during his long childhood, his mother took on the role of guardian, claiming a female right to the succession of the Western empire. Placidia envied, but couldn't match, the reputation and virtues of Theodosius' wife and sister, the talented Eudocia and the wise, effective Pulcheria. Valentinian's mother was jealous of the power she couldn’t truly wield; she ruled for twenty-five years in her son's name. The character of that unfit emperor gradually led to the suspicion that Placidia weakened his youth with a reckless education and deliberately kept his focus away from any manly or honorable pursuits. In the decline of military spirit, her armies were led by two generals, Ætius and Boniface, who rightfully deserve to be called the last of the Romans. Their partnership could have saved a faltering empire, but their rivalry was the immediate cause of losing Africa. The invasion and defeat of Attila made Ætius famous; while time has dimmed his rival's exploits, the defense of Marseilles and the rescue of Africa show Count Boniface's military skills. In battle, during skirmishes, or individual combats, he remained a formidable presence against the Barbarians: the clergy, especially his friend Augustin, admired his Christian faith, which once led him to consider a life of solitude; the public praised his unmatched integrity; the army feared his fair but firm sense of justice, illustrated by a striking example. A peasant who reported his wife's affair with a Gothic soldier was told to appear before him the next day: that evening, the count, having learned where and when that affair would happen, rode ten miles into the countryside, caught the couple in the act, punished the soldier with immediate death, and silenced the husband by presenting him with the adulterer's head the next morning. Ætius and Boniface's skills might have been better used against common enemies in separate, significant commands; however, the history of their actions should have influenced Empress Placidia's real trust and loyalty. During her difficult and sorrowful times of exile, Boniface alone had defended her cause with unwavering loyalty: the forces and resources from Africa significantly helped to quash the rebellion. Ætius also supported that rebellion with his zeal and initiative, bringing an army of sixty thousand Huns from the Danube to the borders of Italy for the usurper's cause. The unexpected death of John compelled him to accept a favorable treaty; yet he continued, as both a subject and soldier of Valentinian, to maintain a secret, possibly treasonous, communication with his Barbarian allies, whose withdrawal he had secured with generous gifts and promises. However, Ætius held a unique advantage in a female-led reign; he was present at the Ravenna palace, using clever and persistent flattery, masking his true intentions with loyalty and friendship, ultimately deceiving both the empress and his absent rival with a cunning conspiracy that a weak woman and a brave man wouldn't easily suspect. He secretly convinced Placidia to recall Boniface from governing Africa; meanwhile, he advised Boniface to ignore the Imperial orders, framing the recall as a death sentence for him and making disobedience sound like an act of revolt. When the gullible and unsuspecting count armed the province to defend himself, Ætius praised his foresight in anticipating the rebellion that his own treachery had instigated. A careful inquiry into Boniface's true motives might have brought a loyal servant back to his duties and to the republic; instead, Ætius continued to manipulate and inflame the situation, pushing the count, through persecution, toward the most desperate measures. Though Boniface managed to repel or evade the initial attacks successfully, he couldn’t foster any false confidence that, leading some disorganized Africans, he could withstand the regular forces of the West commanded by a rival he couldn’t afford to underestimate. After some hesitation, torn between prudence and loyalty, Boniface sent a trusted friend to the court, or rather the camp, of Gonderic, king of the Vandals, to propose a close alliance and offer favorable and lasting terms for settlement.
After the retreat of the Goths, the authority of Honorius had obtained a precarious establishment in Spain; except only in the province of Gallicia, where the Suevi and the Vandals had fortified their camps, in mutual discord and hostile independence. The Vandals prevailed; and their adversaries were besieged in the Nervasian hills, between Leon and Oviedo, till the approach of Count Asterius compelled, or rather provoked, the victorious Barbarians to remove the scene of the war to the plains of Baetica. The rapid progress of the Vandals soon acquired a more effectual opposition; and the master-general Castinus marched against them with a numerous army of Romans and Goths. Vanquished in battle by an inferior army, Castinus fled with dishonor to Tarragona; and this memorable defeat, which has been represented as the punishment, was most probably the effect, of his rash presumption. Seville and Carthagena became the reward, or rather the prey, of the ferocious conquerors; and the vessels which they found in the harbor of Carthagena might easily transport them to the Isles of Majorca and Minorca, where the Spanish fugitives, as in a secure recess, had vainly concealed their families and their fortunes. The experience of navigation, and perhaps the prospect of Africa, encouraged the Vandals to accept the invitation which they received from Count Boniface; and the death of Gonderic served only to forward and animate the bold enterprise. In the room of a prince not conspicuous for any superior powers of the mind or body, they acquired his bastard brother, the terrible Genseric; a name, which, in the destruction of the Roman empire, has deserved an equal rank with the names of Alaric and Attila. The king of the Vandals is described to have been of a middle stature, with a lameness in one leg, which he had contracted by an accidental fall from his horse. His slow and cautious speech seldom declared the deep purposes of his soul; he disdained to imitate the luxury of the vanquished; but he indulged the sterner passions of anger and revenge. The ambition of Genseric was without bounds and without scruples; and the warrior could dexterously employ the dark engines of policy to solicit the allies who might be useful to his success, or to scatter among his enemies the seeds of hatred and contention. Almost in the moment of his departure he was informed that Hermanric, king of the Suevi, had presumed to ravage the Spanish territories, which he was resolved to abandon. Impatient of the insult, Genseric pursued the hasty retreat of the Suevi as far as Merida; precipitated the king and his army into the River Anas, and calmly returned to the sea-shore to embark his victorious troops. The vessels which transported the Vandals over the modern Straits of Gibraltar, a channel only twelve miles in breadth, were furnished by the Spaniards, who anxiously wished their departure; and by the African general, who had implored their formidable assistance.
After the Goths pulled back, Honorius's authority had a shaky hold in Spain, except in the province of Galicia, where the Suevi and the Vandals had set up fortified camps, caught up in mutual conflict and independence. The Vandals came out on top, and their rivals were besieged in the Nervasian hills, located between León and Oviedo, until Count Asterius's arrival forced—actually, provoked—the victorious Barbarians to shift the battleground to the plains of Baetica. The Vandals' rapid advancement soon faced stronger resistance, and the master-general Castinus marched against them with a large army of Romans and Goths. Defeated in battle by a smaller force, Castinus fled in disgrace to Tarragona; this notable defeat, often seen as punishment, was likely the result of his reckless arrogance. Seville and Carthagena quickly fell to the brutal conquerors, and the ships found in the harbor of Carthagena could easily carry them to the Balearic Islands, where Spanish refugees had foolishly hidden their families and treasures in what they thought was a safe place. Their experience in navigation, along with the allure of Africa, motivated the Vandals to take up Count Boniface's offer; the death of Gonderic only fueled their bold plans. Instead of a prince lacking remarkable mental or physical abilities, they gained his illegitimate brother, the fearsome Genseric—a name that deserves to be mentioned alongside Alaric and Attila in the context of the destruction of the Roman Empire. Genseric was described as of average height, with a limp in one leg due to an accidental fall from his horse. His slow, careful speech often hid his true intentions; he refused to mimic the luxuries of the defeated but nurtured the harsher emotions of anger and revenge. Genseric's ambition was limitless and unscrupulous; he skillfully used cunning strategies to win over allies who could assist him or sow discord among his foes. Just as he was about to leave, he learned that Hermanric, the king of the Suevi, had dared to raid the Spanish lands, which he planned to abandon. Outraged by the insult, Genseric chased the Suevi’s rapid retreat all the way to Mérida, forcing the king and his army into the River Anas, before calmly returning to the coast to embark his victorious troops. The ships that took the Vandals across the modern Straits of Gibraltar, a channel only twelve miles wide, were provided by the Spaniards, who were eager for their departure, and by the African general, who had begged for their formidable support.
Our fancy, so long accustomed to exaggerate and multiply the martial swarms of Barbarians that seemed to issue from the North, will perhaps be surprised by the account of the army which Genseric mustered on the coast of Mauritania. The Vandals, who in twenty years had penetrated from the Elbe to Mount Atlas, were united under the command of their warlike king; and he reigned with equal authority over the Alani, who had passed, within the term of human life, from the cold of Scythia to the excessive heat of an African climate. The hopes of the bold enterprise had excited many brave adventurers of the Gothic nation; and many desperate provincials were tempted to repair their fortunes by the same means which had occasioned their ruin. Yet this various multitude amounted only to fifty thousand effective men; and though Genseric artfully magnified his apparent strength, by appointing eighty chiliarchs, or commanders of thousands, the fallacious increase of old men, of children, and of slaves, would scarcely have swelled his army to the number of four-score thousand persons. But his own dexterity, and the discontents of Africa, soon fortified the Vandal powers, by the accession of numerous and active allies. The parts of Mauritania which border on the Great Desert and the Atlantic Ocean, were filled with a fierce and untractable race of men, whose savage temper had been exasperated, rather than reclaimed, by their dread of the Roman arms. The wandering Moors, as they gradually ventured to approach the seashore, and the camp of the Vandals, must have viewed with terror and astonishment the dress, the armor, the martial pride and discipline of the unknown strangers who had landed on their coast; and the fair complexions of the blue-eyed warriors of Germany formed a very singular contrast with the swarthy or olive hue which is derived from the neighborhood of the torrid zone. After the first difficulties had in some measure been removed, which arose from the mutual ignorance of their respective language, the Moors, regardless of any future consequence, embraced the alliance of the enemies of Rome; and a crowd of naked savages rushed from the woods and valleys of Mount Atlas, to satiate their revenge on the polished tyrants, who had injuriously expelled them from the native sovereignty of the land.
Our imagination, long used to exaggerating and multiplying the warrior hordes of Barbarians that seemed to come from the North, might be surprised by the account of the army that Genseric gathered on the coast of Mauritania. The Vandals, who in twenty years had traveled from the Elbe to Mount Atlas, were united under the command of their fierce king; and he ruled equally over the Alani, who had moved, within a human lifetime, from the cold of Scythia to the extreme heat of the African climate. The hopes of this bold venture had inspired many brave adventurers from the Gothic nation; and many desperate locals were tempted to restore their fortunes through the same means that had led to their downfall. Yet this diverse group totaled only fifty thousand effective men; and although Genseric cleverly inflated his apparent strength by appointing eighty chiliarchs, or commanders of thousands, the deceptive addition of old men, children, and slaves would hardly have swelled his army to eighty thousand people. However, his own skill and the discontent in Africa soon strengthened the Vandal forces by bringing in many active allies. The parts of Mauritania that border the Great Desert and the Atlantic Ocean were inhabited by a fierce and unruly group of people whose savage nature had been aggravated, rather than tamed, by their fear of Roman power. The wandering Moors, as they gradually approached the coastline and the Vandal camp, must have looked on in fear and astonishment at the clothing, armor, martial pride, and discipline of the unknown strangers who had landed on their shores; and the fair skin of the blue-eyed warriors from Germany stood in stark contrast to the dark or olive complexion typical of those living near the hot zone. After the initial challenges caused by their mutual language barrier were somewhat overcome, the Moors, disregarding any future consequences, embraced the alliance of the enemies of Rome; and a crowd of naked savages charged out from the woods and valleys of Mount Atlas, eager to exact their revenge on the polished tyrants who had unjustly driven them from their native sovereignty.
The persecution of the Donatists was an event not less favorable to the designs of Genseric. Seventeen years before he landed in Africa, a public conference was held at Carthage, by the order of the magistrate. The Catholics were satisfied, that, after the invincible reasons which they had alleged, the obstinacy of the schismatics must be inexcusable and voluntary; and the emperor Honorius was persuaded to inflict the most rigorous penalties on a faction which had so long abused his patience and clemency. Three hundred bishops, with many thousands of the inferior clergy, were torn from their churches, stripped of their ecclesiastical possessions, banished to the islands, and proscribed by the laws, if they presumed to conceal themselves in the provinces of Africa. Their numerous congregations, both in cities and in the country, were deprived of the rights of citizens, and of the exercise of religious worship. A regular scale of fines, from ten to two hundred pounds of silver, was curiously ascertained, according to the distinction of rank and fortune, to punish the crime of assisting at a schismatic conventicle; and if the fine had been levied five times, without subduing the obstinacy of the offender, his future punishment was referred to the discretion of the Imperial court. By these severities, which obtained the warmest approbation of St. Augustin, great numbers of Donatists were reconciled to the Catholic Church; but the fanatics, who still persevered in their opposition, were provoked to madness and despair; the distracted country was filled with tumult and bloodshed; the armed troops of Circumcellions alternately pointed their rage against themselves, or against their adversaries; and the calendar of martyrs received on both sides a considerable augmentation. Under these circumstances, Genseric, a Christian, but an enemy of the orthodox communion, showed himself to the Donatists as a powerful deliverer, from whom they might reasonably expect the repeal of the odious and oppressive edicts of the Roman emperors. The conquest of Africa was facilitated by the active zeal, or the secret favor, of a domestic faction; the wanton outrages against the churches and the clergy of which the Vandals are accused, may be fairly imputed to the fanaticism of their allies; and the intolerant spirit which disgraced the triumph of Christianity, contributed to the loss of the most important province of the West.
The persecution of the Donatists significantly benefited Genseric’s plans. Seventeen years before he arrived in Africa, a public conference was called in Carthage by the magistrate. The Catholics were convinced that, after presenting solid arguments, the stubbornness of the schismatics was inexcusable and intentional; and the emperor Honorius was persuaded to impose strict penalties on a group that had long tested his patience and kindness. Three hundred bishops, along with many thousands of lower clergy, were removed from their churches, stripped of their church property, banished to islands, and outlawed by the laws if they dared to hide in the provinces of Africa. Their large congregations, both in cities and rural areas, were stripped of rights as citizens and prohibited from practicing their religion. A detailed system of fines, ranging from ten to two hundred pounds of silver, was established, depending on rank and wealth, to punish the offense of attending a schismatic meeting; and if a person had been fined five times without yielding, their future punishment was left to the discretion of the Imperial court. Through these harsh measures, which received strong approval from St. Augustine, many Donatists were brought back to the Catholic Church; however, the fanatics who persisted in their opposition were driven to madness and despair. The troubled country was filled with chaos and bloodshed; the armed groups of Circumcellions directed their violence either towards each other or their opponents, and both sides saw their number of martyrs increase significantly. In this turmoil, Genseric, a Christian but an opponent of orthodox beliefs, presented himself to the Donatists as a powerful liberator, making them hopeful for the repeal of the hateful and oppressive laws of the Roman emperors. The conquest of Africa was made easier by the enthusiastic support or hidden allegiance from a local faction; the rampant attacks against churches and clergy that the Vandals are blamed for can largely be attributed to the fanaticism of their allies; and the intolerant attitude that tainted the rise of Christianity contributed to the loss of the most vital province in the West.
The court and the people were astonished by the strange intelligence, that a virtuous hero, after so many favors, and so many services, had renounced his allegiance, and invited the Barbarians to destroy the province intrusted to his command. The friends of Boniface, who still believed that his criminal behavior might be excused by some honorable motive, solicited, during the absence of Ætius, a free conference with the Count of Africa; and Darius, an officer of high distinction, was named for the important embassy. In their first interview at Carthage, the imaginary provocations were mutually explained; the opposite letters of Ætius were produced and compared; and the fraud was easily detected. Placidia and Boniface lamented their fatal error; and the count had sufficient magnanimity to confide in the forgiveness of his sovereign, or to expose his head to her future resentment. His repentance was fervent and sincere; but he soon discovered that it was no longer in his power to restore the edifice which he had shaken to its foundations. Carthage and the Roman garrisons returned with their general to the allegiance of Valentinian; but the rest of Africa was still distracted with war and faction; and the inexorable king of the Vandals, disdaining all terms of accommodation, sternly refused to relinquish the possession of his prey. The band of veterans who marched under the standard of Boniface, and his hasty levies of provincial troops, were defeated with considerable loss; the victorious Barbarians insulted the open country; and Carthage, Cirta, and Hippo Regius, were the only cities that appeared to rise above the general inundation.
The court and the people were shocked by the strange news that a virtuous hero, after receiving so many favors and doing so many services, had turned against his allegiance and invited the Barbarians to invade the province he was in charge of. Boniface’s friends, who still thought his wrong actions might be justified by some honorable reason, sought, during Ætius's absence, to have a meeting with the Count of Africa. Darius, a highly respected officer, was chosen for this important mission. In their first meeting in Carthage, the supposed provocations were explained to each other; they produced and compared the conflicting letters from Ætius, and the deceit was easily uncovered. Placidia and Boniface regretted their tragic mistake; and the count had enough nobility to rely on his sovereign's forgiveness, or to risk facing her future anger. His remorse was deep and genuine; however, he soon realized he could no longer fix the structure he had shaken to its core. Carthage and the Roman troops returned under their general to support Valentinian; but the rest of Africa was still torn apart by war and conflict. The unyielding king of the Vandals, dismissing any chance of compromise, coldly refused to give up his conquest. The group of veterans that marched under Boniface's banner, along with his quick recruitment of local forces, suffered significant losses; the victorious Barbarians ravaged the open countryside, leaving only Carthage, Cirta, and Hippo Regius standing above the widespread destruction.
The long and narrow tract of the African coast was filled with frequent monuments of Roman art and magnificence; and the respective degrees of improvement might be accurately measured by the distance from Carthage and the Mediterranean. A simple reflection will impress every thinking mind with the clearest idea of fertility and cultivation: the country was extremely populous; the inhabitants reserved a liberal subsistence for their own use; and the annual exportation, particularly of wheat, was so regular and plentiful, that Africa deserved the name of the common granary of Rome and of mankind. On a sudden the seven fruitful provinces, from Tangier to Tripoli, were overwhelmed by the invasion of the Vandals; whose destructive rage has perhaps been exaggerated by popular animosity, religious zeal, and extravagant declamation. War, in its fairest form, implies a perpetual violation of humanity and justice; and the hostilities of Barbarians are inflamed by the fierce and lawless spirit which incessantly disturbs their peaceful and domestic society. The Vandals, where they found resistance, seldom gave quarter; and the deaths of their valiant countrymen were expiated by the ruin of the cities under whose walls they had fallen. Careless of the distinctions of age, or sex, or rank, they employed every species of indignity and torture, to force from the captives a discovery of their hidden wealth. The stern policy of Genseric justified his frequent examples of military execution: he was not always the master of his own passions, or of those of his followers; and the calamities of war were aggravated by the licentiousness of the Moors, and the fanaticism of the Donatists. Yet I shall not easily be persuaded, that it was the common practice of the Vandals to extirpate the olives, and other fruit trees, of a country where they intended to settle: nor can I believe that it was a usual stratagem to slaughter great numbers of their prisoners before the walls of a besieged city, for the sole purpose of infecting the air, and producing a pestilence, of which they themselves must have been the first victims.
The long and narrow stretch of the African coast was dotted with frequent examples of Roman art and grandeur; the level of improvement could be measured by how far it was from Carthage and the Mediterranean. A simple reflection will clearly show any thoughtful person ideas of fertility and cultivation: the region was very populated; the inhabitants kept a generous amount of food for themselves; and the annual exports, especially of wheat, were so consistent and abundant that Africa earned the title of the common granary of Rome and humanity. Suddenly, the seven fertile provinces, from Tangier to Tripoli, were overwhelmed by the invasion of the Vandals, whose destructive rampage has perhaps been exaggerated by popular bias, religious fervor, and extreme rhetoric. War, in its most favorable form, implies a constant violation of humanity and justice; and the hostilities of Barbarians are fueled by the fierce and uncontrolled spirit that relentlessly disrupts their peaceful domestic lives. The Vandals, when faced with resistance, rarely showed mercy; and the deaths of their brave countrymen were avenged by the destruction of the cities where they fell. Ignoring distinctions of age, gender, or status, they used every kind of humiliation and torture to force captives to reveal their hidden wealth. Genseric’s harsh policies justified his frequent acts of military execution; he was not always in control of his own emotions or those of his followers; and the miseries of war were made worse by the lawlessness of the Moors and the zealotry of the Donatists. However, I find it hard to believe that it was common for the Vandals to destroy the olives and other fruit trees in a land where they planned to settle; nor do I think it was a usual tactic to massacre large numbers of their prisoners in front of a besieged city just to contaminate the air and cause a plague, of which they themselves would be the first victims.
The generous mind of Count Boniface was tortured by the exquisite distress of beholding the ruin which he had occasioned, and whose rapid progress he was unable to check. After the loss of a battle he retired into Hippo Regius; where he was immediately besieged by an enemy, who considered him as the real bulwark of Africa. The maritime colony of Hippo, about two hundred miles westward of Carthage, had formerly acquired the distinguishing epithet of Regius, from the residence of Numidian kings; and some remains of trade and populousness still adhere to the modern city, which is known in Europe by the corrupted name of Bona. The military labors, and anxious reflections, of Count Boniface, were alleviated by the edifying conversation of his friend St. Augustin; till that bishop, the light and pillar of the Catholic church, was gently released, in the third month of the siege, and in the seventy-sixth year of his age, from the actual and the impending calamities of his country. The youth of Augustin had been stained by the vices and errors which he so ingenuously confesses; but from the moment of his conversion to that of his death, the manners of the bishop of Hippo were pure and austere: and the most conspicuous of his virtues was an ardent zeal against heretics of every denomination; the Manichæans, the Donatists, and the Pelagians, against whom he waged a perpetual controversy. When the city, some months after his death, was burnt by the Vandals, the library was fortunately saved, which contained his voluminous writings; two hundred and thirty-two separate books or treatises on theological subjects, besides a complete exposition of the psalter and the gospel, and a copious magazine of epistles and homilies. According to the judgment of the most impartial critics, the superficial learning of Augustin was confined to the Latin language; and his style, though sometimes animated by the eloquence of passion, is usually clouded by false and affected rhetoric. But he possessed a strong, capacious, argumentative mind; he boldly sounded the dark abyss of grace, predestination, free will, and original sin; and the rigid system of Christianity which he framed or restored, has been entertained, with public applause, and secret reluctance, by the Latin church.
The generous heart of Count Boniface was tormented by the deep anguish of witnessing the destruction he had caused, which he was unable to stop. After losing a battle, he retreated to Hippo Regius, where he was immediately besieged by an enemy who viewed him as the true protector of Africa. The coastal town of Hippo, about two hundred miles west of Carthage, had earned the title Regius from its association with Numidian kings; some remnants of trade and population still existed in the modern city, now known in Europe by the corrupted name Bona. Count Boniface's military efforts and worried thoughts were eased by the inspiring conversations with his friend St. Augustine, until that bishop, the guiding light of the Catholic Church, was peacefully released from the struggles of his country three months into the siege and at the age of seventy-six. Augustine's youth was marked by vices and mistakes he openly admitted; however, from the moment of his conversion until his death, the character of the bishop of Hippo was pure and strict, with one of his most notable virtues being his intense opposition to heretics of every kind, including the Manichaeans, the Donatists, and the Pelagians, against whom he continuously fought. A few months after his death, when the city was burned by the Vandals, his library was thankfully saved, containing his extensive writings: two hundred and thirty-two individual books or treatises on theological topics, along with a complete exposition of the Psalter and the Gospel, and a rich collection of letters and sermons. According to the judgment of the most unbiased critics, Augustine's superficial knowledge was limited to the Latin language; his style, although sometimes energized by passionate eloquence, is often clouded by exaggerated and affected rhetoric. Yet, he had a strong, expansive, and argumentative mind; he boldly explored the complex issues of grace, predestination, free will, and original sin, and the strict system of Christianity he developed or restored has been accepted, with both public acclaim and private hesitation, by the Latin Church.
Chapter XXXIII: Conquest Of Africa By The Vandals.—Part II.
By the skill of Boniface, and perhaps by the ignorance of the Vandals, the siege of Hippo was protracted above fourteen months: the sea was continually open; and when the adjacent country had been exhausted by irregular rapine, the besiegers themselves were compelled by famine to relinquish their enterprise. The importance and danger of Africa were deeply felt by the regent of the West. Placidia implored the assistance of her eastern ally; and the Italian fleet and army were reënforced by Asper, who sailed from Constantinople with a powerful armament. As soon as the force of the two empires was united under the command of Boniface, he boldly marched against the Vandals; and the loss of a second battle irretrievably decided the fate of Africa. He embarked with the precipitation of despair; and the people of Hippo were permitted, with their families and effects, to occupy the vacant place of the soldiers, the greatest part of whom were either slain or made prisoners by the Vandals. The count, whose fatal credulity had wounded the vitals of the republic, might enter the palace of Ravenna with some anxiety, which was soon removed by the smiles of Placidia. Boniface accepted with gratitude the rank of patrician, and the dignity of master-general of the Roman armies; but he must have blushed at the sight of those medals, in which he was represented with the name and attributes of victory. The discovery of his fraud, the displeasure of the empress, and the distinguished favor of his rival, exasperated the haughty and perfidious soul of Ætius. He hastily returned from Gaul to Italy, with a retinue, or rather with an army, of Barbarian followers; and such was the weakness of the government, that the two generals decided their private quarrel in a bloody battle. Boniface was successful; but he received in the conflict a mortal wound from the spear of his adversary, of which he expired within a few days, in such Christian and charitable sentiments, that he exhorted his wife, a rich heiress of Spain, to accept Ætius for her second husband. But Ætius could not derive any immediate advantage from the generosity of his dying enemy: he was proclaimed a rebel by the justice of Placidia; and though he attempted to defend some strong fortresses, erected on his patrimonial estate, the Imperial power soon compelled him to retire into Pannonia, to the tents of his faithful Huns. The republic was deprived, by their mutual discord, of the service of her two most illustrious champions.
By Boniface's skill and possibly the Vandals' ignorance, the siege of Hippo dragged on for over fourteen months. The sea remained constantly open, and when the surrounding area was stripped bare by sporadic raids, the besiegers were forced by hunger to abandon their efforts. The significance and threat of Africa were keenly felt by the regent of the West. Placidia sought help from her eastern ally, and Asper came from Constantinople with a powerful fleet and army to reinforce the Italian forces. Once the might of the two empires was united under Boniface's command, he boldly marched against the Vandals. The loss of a second battle sealed Africa's fate. In desperation, he fled by ship, and the people of Hippo, along with their families and belongings, were allowed to take the soldiers' vacant positions, most of whom were either killed or captured by the Vandals. The count, whose gullibility had seriously harmed the republic, entered the palace in Ravenna with some trepidation, which was quickly eased by Placidia's warm reception. Boniface gratefully accepted the title of patrician and the role of master-general of the Roman armies, but he must have felt embarrassed seeing the medals depicting him with the name and attributes of victory. The revelation of his deception, the empress's anger, and the favor shown to his rival stoked Ætius's pride and treachery. He hurried back from Gaul to Italy, accompanied by a retinue that resembled an army of barbarian followers. The government's weakness allowed the two generals to settle their private feud in a bloody battle. Boniface emerged victorious but sustained a fatal wound from his opponent's spear and died within a few days, expressing Christian and charitable sentiments as he urged his wife, a wealthy Spanish heiress, to marry Ætius. However, Ætius could not gain any immediate benefit from the dying enemy's generosity; he was declared a rebel by Placidia’s justice. Despite his attempts to hold some strong fortifications on his family estate, the Imperial power soon forced him to retreat to Pannonia, to the tents of his loyal Huns. The republic suffered due to their mutual conflict, losing the service of its two most distinguished champions.
It might naturally be expected, after the retreat of Boniface, that the Vandals would achieve, without resistance or delay, the conquest of Africa. Eight years, however, elapsed, from the evacuation of Hippo to the reduction of Carthage. In the midst of that interval, the ambitious Genseric, in the full tide of apparent prosperity, negotiated a treaty of peace, by which he gave his son Hunneric for a hostage; and consented to leave the Western emperor in the undisturbed possession of the three Mauritanias. This moderation, which cannot be imputed to the justice, must be ascribed to the policy, of the conqueror. His throne was encompassed with domestic enemies, who accused the baseness of his birth, and asserted the legitimate claims of his nephews, the sons of Gonderic. Those nephews, indeed, he sacrificed to his safety; and their mother, the widow of the deceased king, was precipitated, by his order, into the river Ampsaga. But the public discontent burst forth in dangerous and frequent conspiracies; and the warlike tyrant is supposed to have shed more Vandal blood by the hand of the executioner, than in the field of battle. The convulsions of Africa, which had favored his attack, opposed the firm establishment of his power; and the various seditions of the Moors and Germans, the Donatists and Catholics, continually disturbed, or threatened, the unsettled reign of the conqueror. As he advanced towards Carthage, he was forced to withdraw his troops from the Western provinces; the sea-coast was exposed to the naval enterprises of the Romans of Spain and Italy; and, in the heart of Numidia, the strong inland city of Corta still persisted in obstinate independence. These difficulties were gradually subdued by the spirit, the perseverance, and the cruelty of Genseric; who alternately applied the arts of peace and war to the establishment of his African kingdom. He subscribed a solemn treaty, with the hope of deriving some advantage from the term of its continuance, and the moment of its violation. The vigilance of his enemies was relaxed by the protestations of friendship, which concealed his hostile approach; and Carthage was at length surprised by the Vandals, five hundred and eighty-five years after the destruction of the city and republic by the younger Scipio.
It might have been expected, after Boniface's retreat, that the Vandals would easily conquer Africa without any resistance or delay. However, eight years passed between the evacuation of Hippo and the fall of Carthage. During that time, the ambitious Genseric, seemingly thriving, negotiated a peace treaty in which he offered his son Hunneric as a hostage and agreed to let the Western emperor keep control of the three Mauritanias. This show of restraint, which cannot be attributed to fairness, must be seen as a strategic move by the conqueror. His throne was surrounded by domestic enemies accusing him of having lowly origins and claiming the legitimate rights of his nephews, the sons of Gonderic. He even sacrificed those nephews to protect himself, and ordered the widow of the deceased king to be thrown into the river Ampsaga. However, public discontent led to frequent and dangerous conspiracies; the warlike tyrant is believed to have caused more Vandal bloodshed through executions than in actual battles. The turmoil in Africa, which had helped his initial attack, made it difficult to solidify his power, as the various uprisings among the Moors and Germans, and the Donatists and Catholics, constantly disrupted or threatened his unstable reign. As he moved toward Carthage, he was forced to pull his troops back from the Western provinces; the coastline was vulnerable to naval assaults from the Romans in Spain and Italy; and in the heart of Numidia, the strong inland city of Corta continued to resist fiercely. Genseric gradually overcame these challenges with his cunning, determination, and brutality, using both peaceful and military tactics to establish his African kingdom. He signed a formal treaty, hoping to gain some benefit from its duration and the moment it was broken. His enemies' vigilance was lowered by his friendly assurances, which hid his hostile intentions, and Carthage was ultimately caught off guard by the Vandals, five hundred eighty-five years after the city and republic fell to the younger Scipio.
A new city had arisen from its ruins, with the title of a colony; and though Carthage might yield to the royal prerogatives of Constantinople, and perhaps to the trade of Alexandria, or the splendor of Antioch, she still maintained the second rank in the West; as the Rome (if we may use the style of contemporaries) of the African world. That wealthy and opulent metropolis displayed, in a dependent condition, the image of a flourishing republic. Carthage contained the manufactures, the arms, and the treasures of the six provinces. A regular subordination of civil honors gradually ascended from the procurators of the streets and quarters of the city, to the tribunal of the supreme magistrate, who, with the title of proconsul, represented the state and dignity of a consul of ancient Rome. Schools and gymnasia were instituted for the education of the African youth; and the liberal arts and manners, grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy, were publicly taught in the Greek and Latin languages. The buildings of Carthage were uniform and magnificent; a shady grove was planted in the midst of the capital; the new port, a secure and capacious harbor, was subservient to the commercial industry of citizens and strangers; and the splendid games of the circus and theatre were exhibited almost in the presence of the Barbarians. The reputation of the Carthaginians was not equal to that of their country, and the reproach of Punic faith still adhered to their subtle and faithless character. The habits of trade, and the abuse of luxury, had corrupted their manners; but their impious contempt of monks, and the shameless practice of unnatural lusts, are the two abominations which excite the pious vehemence of Salvian, the preacher of the age. The king of the Vandals severely reformed the vices of a voluptuous people; and the ancient, noble, ingenuous freedom of Carthage (these expressions of Victor are not without energy) was reduced by Genseric into a state of ignominious servitude. After he had permitted his licentious troops to satiate their rage and avarice, he instituted a more regular system of rapine and oppression. An edict was promulgated, which enjoined all persons, without fraud or delay, to deliver their gold, silver, jewels, and valuable furniture or apparel, to the royal officers; and the attempt to secrete any part of their patrimony was inexorably punished with death and torture, as an act of treason against the state. The lands of the proconsular province, which formed the immediate district of Carthage, were accurately measured, and divided among the Barbarians; and the conqueror reserved for his peculiar domain the fertile territory of Byzacium, and the adjacent parts of Numidia and Getulia.
A new city had risen from its ruins, known as a colony; and while Carthage might be overshadowed by the royal powers of Constantinople, and perhaps by the trade of Alexandria or the grandeur of Antioch, it still held the second place in the West, as the Rome (to use the terminology of the time) of the African world. This wealthy and prosperous metropolis showcased, though in a subordinate condition, the image of a thriving republic. Carthage boasted the industries, military resources, and treasures of the six provinces. A structured hierarchy of civil honors gradually progressed from the city’s local procurators to the court of the highest magistrate, who, with the title of proconsul, represented the state and dignity of an ancient Roman consul. Schools and gymnasia were established for the education of African youth, where the liberal arts and subjects like grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy were taught publicly in Greek and Latin. The buildings in Carthage were uniform and splendid; a shaded grove was planted in the center of the city; the new port, a secure and spacious harbor, supported the commercial activities of both citizens and visitors; and the grand games of the circus and theatre were held almost in the presence of the Barbarians. However, the reputation of the Carthaginians did not match that of their city, and the stigma of Punic faith still clung to their cunning and untrustworthy nature. Their trading habits and excessive indulgence had corrupted their morals, but their irreverent disdain for monks and their brazen engagement in unnatural desires were the two sins that fueled the zealous outrage of Salvian, the preacher of the time. The king of the Vandals harshly reformed the vices of a pleasure-seeking populace; and the ancient, noble, and genuine freedom of Carthage (these phrases by Victor indeed hold power) was turned by Genseric into a state of shameful servitude. After allowing his unruly troops to fulfill their lust and greed, he implemented a more systematic approach to plunder and oppression. An edict was issued, mandating that everyone must hand over their gold, silver, jewels, and valuable possessions to the royal officers without deceit or delay; anyone caught trying to hide any part of their inheritance faced inevitable punishment with death and torture, deemed an act of treason against the state. The lands of the proconsular province, which surrounded Carthage, were meticulously measured and distributed among the Barbarians; the conqueror also reserved for himself the fertile lands of Byzacium and the nearby regions of Numidia and Getulia.
It was natural enough that Genseric should hate those whom he had injured: the nobility and senators of Carthage were exposed to his jealousy and resentment; and all those who refused the ignominious terms, which their honor and religion forbade them to accept, were compelled by the Arian tyrant to embrace the condition of perpetual banishment. Rome, Italy, and the provinces of the East, were filled with a crowd of exiles, of fugitives, and of ingenuous captives, who solicited the public compassion; and the benevolent epistles of Theodoret still preserve the names and misfortunes of Cælestian and Maria. The Syrian bishop deplores the misfortunes of Cælestian, who, from the state of a noble and opulent senator of Carthage, was reduced, with his wife and family, and servants, to beg his bread in a foreign country; but he applauds the resignation of the Christian exile, and the philosophic temper, which, under the pressure of such calamities, could enjoy more real happiness than was the ordinary lot of wealth and prosperity. The story of Maria, the daughter of the magnificent Eudæmon, is singular and interesting. In the sack of Carthage, she was purchased from the Vandals by some merchants of Syria, who afterwards sold her as a slave in their native country. A female attendant, transported in the same ship, and sold in the same family, still continued to respect a mistress whom fortune had reduced to the common level of servitude; and the daughter of Eudæmon received from her grateful affection the domestic services which she had once required from her obedience. This remarkable behavior divulged the real condition of Maria, who, in the absence of the bishop of Cyrrhus, was redeemed from slavery by the generosity of some soldiers of the garrison. The liberality of Theodoret provided for her decent maintenance; and she passed ten months among the deaconesses of the church; till she was unexpectedly informed, that her father, who had escaped from the ruin of Carthage, exercised an honorable office in one of the Western provinces. Her filial impatience was seconded by the pious bishop: Theodoret, in a letter still extant, recommends Maria to the bishop of Ægæ, a maritime city of Cilicia, which was frequented, during the annual fair, by the vessels of the West; most earnestly requesting, that his colleague would use the maiden with a tenderness suitable to her birth; and that he would intrust her to the care of such faithful merchants, as would esteem it a sufficient gain, if they restored a daughter, lost beyond all human hope, to the arms of her afflicted parent.
It was only natural for Genseric to hate those he had wronged: the nobility and senators of Carthage were vulnerable to his jealousy and anger; and everyone who refused the shameful terms, which their honor and faith prevented them from accepting, was forced by the Arian tyrant into a state of permanent exile. Rome, Italy, and the eastern provinces were filled with exiles, fugitives, and innocent captives who sought public sympathy; and the compassionate letters of Theodoret still record the names and tragedies of Cælestian and Maria. The Syrian bishop mourns the plight of Cælestian, who, once a noble and wealthy senator of Carthage, was reduced, along with his wife, family, and servants, to begging for food in a foreign land; yet he praises the strength of the Christian exile and the philosophical mindset that could find more true happiness amidst such suffering than what was usually found in wealth and prosperity. The story of Maria, the daughter of the illustrious Eudæmon, is unique and captivating. During the sack of Carthage, she was bought from the Vandals by some Syrian merchants, who later sold her as a slave back in their homeland. A female servant, who was also transported on the same ship and sold to the same family, continued to regard her mistress, who fate had brought down to the level of slavery; and the daughter of Eudæmon received from her loyal affection the service she once commanded from her obedience. This extraordinary act revealed Maria's true situation, and during the absence of the bishop of Cyrrhus, she was freed from slavery by the kindness of some soldiers stationed there. The generosity of Theodoret ensured her proper support; and she spent ten months among the deaconesses of the church, until she was unexpectedly informed that her father, having escaped the destruction of Carthage, held an honorable position in one of the Western provinces. Her eager desire to reunite with him was supported by the devout bishop: Theodoret, in a letter still in existence, recommends Maria to the bishop of Ægæ, a coastal city of Cilicia that saw vessels from the West during the annual fair; he earnestly requests that his colleague treat the young woman with the kindness appropriate for her status, and that he entrust her to reliable merchants who would see it as a significant reward to return a daughter, thought lost beyond hope, to the arms of her grieving father.
Among the insipid legends of ecclesiastical history, I am tempted to distinguish the memorable fable of the Seven Sleepers; whose imaginary date corresponds with the reign of the younger Theodosius, and the conquest of Africa by the Vandals. When the emperor Decius persecuted the Christians, seven noble youths of Ephesus concealed themselves in a spacious cavern in the side of an adjacent mountain; where they were doomed to perish by the tyrant, who gave orders that the entrance should be firmly secured by the a pile of huge stones. They immediately fell into a deep slumber, which was miraculously prolonged without injuring the powers of life, during a period of one hundred and eighty-seven years. At the end of that time, the slaves of Adolius, to whom the inheritance of the mountain had descended, removed the stones to supply materials for some rustic edifice: the light of the sun darted into the cavern, and the Seven Sleepers were permitted to awake. After a slumber, as they thought of a few hours, they were pressed by the calls of hunger; and resolved that Jamblichus, one of their number, should secretly return to the city to purchase bread for the use of his companions. The youth (if we may still employ that appellation) could no longer recognize the once familiar aspect of his native country; and his surprise was increased by the appearance of a large cross, triumphantly erected over the principal gate of Ephesus. His singular dress, and obsolete language, confounded the baker, to whom he offered an ancient medal of Decius as the current coin of the empire; and Jamblichus, on the suspicion of a secret treasure, was dragged before the judge. Their mutual inquiries produced the amazing discovery, that two centuries were almost elapsed since Jamblichus and his friends had escaped from the rage of a Pagan tyrant. The bishop of Ephesus, the clergy, the magistrates, the people, and, as it is said, the emperor Theodosius himself, hastened to visit the cavern of the Seven Sleepers; who bestowed their benediction, related their story, and at the same instant peaceably expired. The origin of this marvellous fable cannot be ascribed to the pious fraud and credulity of the modern Greeks, since the authentic tradition may be traced within half a century of the supposed miracle. James of Sarug, a Syrian bishop, who was born only two years after the death of the younger Theodosius, has devoted one of his two hundred and thirty homilies to the praise of the young men of Ephesus. Their legend, before the end of the sixth century, was translated from the Syriac into the Latin language, by the care of Gregory of Tours. The hostile communions of the East preserve their memory with equal reverence; and their names are honorably inscribed in the Roman, the Abyssinian, and the Russian calendar. Nor has their reputation been confined to the Christian world. This popular tale, which Mahomet might learn when he drove his camels to the fairs of Syria, is introduced as a divine revelation, into the Koran. The story of the Seven Sleepers has been adopted and adorned by the nations, from Bengal to Africa, who profess the Mahometan religion; and some vestiges of a similar tradition have been discovered in the remote extremities of Scandinavia. This easy and universal belief, so expressive of the sense of mankind, may be ascribed to the genuine merit of the fable itself. We imperceptibly advance from youth to age, without observing the gradual, but incessant, change of human affairs; and even in our larger experience of history, the imagination is accustomed, by a perpetual series of causes and effects, to unite the most distant revolutions. But if the interval between two memorable æras could be instantly annihilated; if it were possible, after a momentary slumber of two hundred years, to display the new world to the eyes of a spectator, who still retained a lively and recent impression of the old, his surprise and his reflections would furnish the pleasing subject of a philosophical romance. The scene could not be more advantageously placed, than in the two centuries which elapsed between the reigns of Decius and of Theodosius the Younger. During this period, the seat of government had been transported from Rome to a new city on the banks of the Thracian Bosphorus; and the abuse of military spirit had been suppressed by an artificial system of tame and ceremonious servitude. The throne of the persecuting Decius was filled by a succession of Christian and orthodox princes, who had extirpated the fabulous gods of antiquity: and the public devotion of the age was impatient to exalt the saints and martyrs of the Catholic church, on the altars of Diana and Hercules. The union of the Roman empire was dissolved; its genius was humbled in the dust; and armies of unknown Barbarians, issuing from the frozen regions of the North, had established their victorious reign over the fairest provinces of Europe and Africa.
Among the dull legends of church history, I want to highlight the memorable story of the Seven Sleepers; whose fictional timeline aligns with the reign of the younger Theodosius and the Vandals' conquest of Africa. During the persecution of Christians by Emperor Decius, seven noble youths from Ephesus hid in a large cave on a nearby mountain; they were meant to perish by the tyrant's orders, who had commanded that the entrance be sealed with a massive pile of stones. They soon fell into a deep sleep, miraculously lasting without harming their life functions, for one hundred and eighty-seven years. When that time was up, slaves belonging to Adolius, who inherited the mountain, moved the stones to use them for building a rustic structure: sunlight poured into the cave, and the Seven Sleepers were able to wake up. After what they assumed was just a few hours of sleep, hunger set in, and they decided that Jamblichus, one of their group, should sneak back to the city to buy bread for his friends. The young man (if we can still call him that) couldn’t recognize the familiar sights of his homeland anymore; his astonishment grew when he saw a large cross proudly displayed over the main gate of Ephesus. His unusual clothing and outdated language confused the baker when he offered an ancient coin of Decius as current currency; and out of suspicion of hidden treasure, Jamblichus was taken before the judge. Their questions revealed the shocking fact that nearly two centuries had passed since Jamblichus and his buddies escaped the wrath of a pagan tyrant. The Bishop of Ephesus, along with the clergy, magistrates, the public, and reportedly even Emperor Theodosius himself rushed to visit the cave of the Seven Sleepers; they gave their blessings, shared their story, and peacefully passed away at that very moment. The origin of this remarkable tale cannot be attributed to the pious deceit and gullibility of the modern Greeks, as the authentic tradition can be traced back within fifty years of the supposed miracle. James of Sarug, a Syrian bishop born just two years after the death of the younger Theodosius, devoted one of his two hundred thirty sermons to honor the young men of Ephesus. Their legend was translated from Syriac to Latin before the end of the sixth century, thanks to Gregory of Tours. The rival factions in the East honor their memory equally; their names are respectfully listed in the Roman, Abyssinian, and Russian calendars. Their fame hasn't been limited to the Christian world. This popular story, which Muhammad might have heard while driving his camels to fairs in Syria, is presented as a divine revelation in the Koran. The tale of the Seven Sleepers has been embraced and embellished by nations from Bengal to Africa that follow the Islamic faith; and some remnants of a similar legend have been uncovered in the far reaches of Scandinavia. This widespread and simple belief, so reflective of human nature, can be attributed to the intrinsic value of the story itself. We gradually move from youth to old age without noticing the slow, yet constant, changes in human affairs; and even with our broader understanding of history, the imagination tends to connect the most distant events through a continuous stream of causes and effects. But if the gap between two significant eras could disappear instantly; if it were possible to introduce a spectator, still vividly recalling the old world, to the new after a brief slumber of two hundred years, his astonishment and thoughts would create a delightful subject for a philosophical tale. The backdrop couldn't be better set than in the two centuries that passed between the reigns of Decius and Theodosius the Younger. During that time, the center of government had moved from Rome to a new city by the Thracian Bosphorus; and the excessive military spirit had been curbed by a forced system of tame and formal servitude. The throne once held by the persecutor Decius was taken over by a series of Christian and orthodox rulers who had eliminated the mythical gods of old: and the public devotion of the time was eager to honor the saints and martyrs of the Catholic church at the altars of Diana and Hercules. The unity of the Roman Empire had crumbled; its spirit lay in the dust; and armies of unknown barbarians, emerging from the icy regions of the North, established their victorious rule over the most beautiful provinces of Europe and Africa.
Chapter XXXIV: Attila.—Part I.
The Character, Conquests, And Court Of Attila, King Of The Huns.—Death Of Theodosius The Younger.—Elevation Of Marcian To The Empire Of The East.
The Character, Conquests, And Court Of Attila, King Of The Huns.—Death Of Theodosius The Younger.—Elevation Of Marcian To The Empire Of The East.
The Western world was oppressed by the Goths and Vandals, who fled before the Huns; but the achievements of the Huns themselves were not adequate to their power and prosperity. Their victorious hordes had spread from the Volga to the Danube; but the public force was exhausted by the discord of independent chieftains; their valor was idly consumed in obscure and predatory excursions; and they often degraded their national dignity, by condescending, for the hopes of spoil, to enlist under the banners of their fugitive enemies. In the reign of Attila, the Huns again became the terror of the world; and I shall now describe the character and actions of that formidable Barbarian; who alternately insulted and invaded the East and the West, and urged the rapid downfall of the Roman empire.
The Western world was crushed by the Goths and Vandals, who ran away from the Huns; however, the Huns' achievements didn’t reflect their power and wealth. Their victorious groups spread from the Volga River to the Danube, but their collective strength was weakened by the conflicts among independent leaders. Their bravery was wasted on unimportant and raiding adventures, and they often lowered their national pride by teaming up with their fleeing enemies for the promise of loot. During Attila’s reign, the Huns once again became a dreaded force; now I will describe the character and actions of that formidable Barbarian, who alternately insulted and invaded both the East and the West, pushing the Roman Empire rapidly toward its collapse.
In the tide of emigration which impetuously rolled from the confines of China to those of Germany, the most powerful and populous tribes may commonly be found on the verge of the Roman provinces. The accumulated weight was sustained for a while by artificial barriers; and the easy condescension of the emperors invited, without satisfying, the insolent demands of the Barbarians, who had acquired an eager appetite for the luxuries of civilized life. The Hungarians, who ambitiously insert the name of Attila among their native kings, may affirm with truth that the hordes, which were subject to his uncle Roas, or Rugilas, had formed their encampments within the limits of modern Hungary, in a fertile country, which liberally supplied the wants of a nation of hunters and shepherds. In this advantageous situation, Rugilas, and his valiant brothers, who continually added to their power and reputation, commanded the alternative of peace or war with the two empires. His alliance with the Romans of the West was cemented by his personal friendship for the great Ætius; who was always secure of finding, in the Barbarian camp, a hospitable reception and a powerful support. At his solicitation, and in the name of John the usurper, sixty thousand Huns advanced to the confines of Italy; their march and their retreat were alike expensive to the state; and the grateful policy of Ætius abandoned the possession of Pannonia to his faithful confederates. The Romans of the East were not less apprehensive of the arms of Rugilas, which threatened the provinces, or even the capital. Some ecclesiastical historians have destroyed the Barbarians with lightning and pestilence; but Theodosius was reduced to the more humble expedient of stipulating an annual payment of three hundred and fifty pounds of gold, and of disguising this dishonorable tribute by the title of general, which the king of the Huns condescended to accept. The public tranquillity was frequently interrupted by the fierce impatience of the Barbarians, and the perfidious intrigues of the Byzantine court. Four dependent nations, among whom we may distinguish the Barbarians, disclaimed the sovereignty of the Huns; and their revolt was encouraged and protected by a Roman alliance; till the just claims, and formidable power, of Rugilas, were effectually urged by the voice of Eslaw his ambassador. Peace was the unanimous wish of the senate: their decree was ratified by the emperor; and two ambassadors were named, Plinthas, a general of Scythian extraction, but of consular rank; and the quæstor Epigenes, a wise and experienced statesman, who was recommended to that office by his ambitious colleague.
In the wave of emigration that surged from the borders of China to those of Germany, the most powerful and populous tribes were often found on the edge of the Roman provinces. For a time, this buildup was held back by artificial barriers; the emperors' easygoing attitude encouraged the bold demands of the Barbarians, who had developed a strong craving for the luxuries of civilized life. The Hungarians, who proudly include Attila among their historical kings, can confidently say that the groups under his uncle Roas, or Rugilas, had set up their camps within what is now modern Hungary, in fertile land that provided abundantly for a society of hunters and herders. In this favorable position, Rugilas and his brave brothers, who consistently grew their power and reputation, held the choice of peace or war with the two empires. His alliance with the Western Romans was strengthened by his personal friendship with the great Ætius, who always found a warm welcome and strong support in the Barbarian camp. At his request, and in the name of John the usurper, sixty thousand Huns advanced toward the borders of Italy; their march and retreat were costly for the state, and Ætius's grateful strategy allowed his loyal allies to keep control of Pannonia. The Eastern Romans were equally worried about Rugilas's forces threatening their provinces or even the capital. Some church historians have described the Barbarians as being struck down by lightning and plague, but Theodosius resorted to the more humble approach of agreeing to an annual payment of three hundred and fifty pounds of gold, masking this dishonorable tribute under the title of a general, which the king of the Huns graciously accepted. Public peace was frequently disturbed by the fierce impatience of the Barbarians and the deceitful plots of the Byzantine court. Four subordinate nations, including the Barbarians, rejected Hunnic rule; their revolt was encouraged and supported by a Roman alliance until the rightful claims and formidable power of Rugilas were effectively communicated by Eslaw, his ambassador. The senate unanimously desired peace: their decision was confirmed by the emperor, and two ambassadors were appointed—Plinthas, a general of Scythian descent but of consular rank, and the quæstor Epigenes, a wise and experienced statesman, who was recommended for the role by his ambitious colleague.
The death of Rugilas suspended the progress of the treaty. His two nephews, Attila and Bleda, who succeeded to the throne of their uncle, consented to a personal interview with the ambassadors of Constantinople; but as they proudly refused to dismount, the business was transacted on horseback, in a spacious plain near the city of Margus, in the Upper Mæsia. The kings of the Huns assumed the solid benefits, as well as the vain honors, of the negotiation. They dictated the conditions of peace, and each condition was an insult on the majesty of the empire. Besides the freedom of a safe and plentiful market on the banks of the Danube, they required that the annual contribution should be augmented from three hundred and fifty to seven hundred pounds of gold; that a fine or ransom of eight pieces of gold should be paid for every Roman captive who had escaped from his Barbarian master; that the emperor should renounce all treaties and engagements with the enemies of the Huns; and that all the fugitives who had taken refuge in the court or provinces of Theodosius, should be delivered to the justice of their offended sovereign. This justice was rigorously inflicted on some unfortunate youths of a royal race. They were crucified on the territories of the empire, by the command of Attila: and as soon as the king of the Huns had impressed the Romans with the terror of his name, he indulged them in a short and arbitrary respite, whilst he subdued the rebellious or independent nations of Scythia and Germany.
The death of Rugilas halted the progress of the treaty. His two nephews, Attila and Bleda, who took over the throne from their uncle, agreed to meet with the ambassadors from Constantinople. However, they stubbornly refused to get off their horses, so the negotiations took place while they were still mounted, in a large open area near the city of Margus, in Upper Mæsia. The kings of the Huns took both the tangible benefits and the empty honors from the talks. They set the terms for peace, each one being an affront to the dignity of the empire. In addition to the promise of a safe and prosperous market along the Danube, they demanded that the annual payment increase from three hundred and fifty to seven hundred pounds of gold; that a fine of eight pieces of gold be paid for every Roman captive who escaped from their Barbarian owner; that the emperor renounce all treaties and agreements with the Huns' enemies; and that all refugees who had sought shelter in the court or provinces of Theodosius be returned to face the justice of their aggrieved ruler. This justice was harshly carried out on some unfortunate young men of royal lineage. They were crucified on the empire's lands by Attila's order, and once the king of the Huns had instilled fear among the Romans with his name, he allowed them a brief and arbitrary break while he subdued the rebellious or independent tribes of Scythia and Germany.
Attila, the son of Mundzuk, deduced his noble, perhaps his regal, descent from the ancient Huns, who had formerly contended with the monarchs of China. His features, according to the observation of a Gothic historian, bore the stamp of his national origin; and the portrait of Attila exhibits the genuine deformity of a modern Calmuk; a large head, a swarthy complexion, small, deep-seated eyes, a flat nose, a few hairs in the place of a beard, broad shoulders, and a short square body, of nervous strength, though of a disproportioned form. The haughty step and demeanor of the king of the Huns expressed the consciousness of his superiority above the rest of mankind; and he had a custom of fiercely rolling his eyes, as if he wished to enjoy the terror which he inspired. Yet this savage hero was not inaccessible to pity; his suppliant enemies might confide in the assurance of peace or pardon; and Attila was considered by his subjects as a just and indulgent master. He delighted in war; but, after he had ascended the throne in a mature age, his head, rather than his hand, achieved the conquest of the North; and the fame of an adventurous soldier was usefully exchanged for that of a prudent and successful general. The effects of personal valor are so inconsiderable, except in poetry or romance, that victory, even among Barbarians, must depend on the degree of skill with which the passions of the multitude are combined and guided for the service of a single man. The Scythian conquerors, Attila and Zingis, surpassed their rude countrymen in art rather than in courage; and it may be observed that the monarchies, both of the Huns and of the Moguls, were erected by their founders on the basis of popular superstition The miraculous conception, which fraud and credulity ascribed to the virgin-mother of Zingis, raised him above the level of human nature; and the naked prophet, who in the name of the Deity invested him with the empire of the earth, pointed the valor of the Moguls with irresistible enthusiasm. The religious arts of Attila were not less skillfully adapted to the character of his age and country. It was natural enough that the Scythians should adore, with peculiar devotion, the god of war; but as they were incapable of forming either an abstract idea, or a corporeal representation, they worshipped their tutelar deity under the symbol of an iron cimeter. One of the shepherds of the Huns perceived, that a heifer, who was grazing, had wounded herself in the foot, and curiously followed the track of the blood, till he discovered, among the long grass, the point of an ancient sword, which he dug out of the ground and presented to Attila. That magnanimous, or rather that artful, prince accepted, with pious gratitude, this celestial favor; and, as the rightful possessor of the sword of Mars, asserted his divine and indefeasible claim to the dominion of the earth. If the rites of Scythia were practised on this solemn occasion, a lofty altar, or rather pile of fagots, three hundred yards in length and in breadth, was raised in a spacious plain; and the sword of Mars was placed erect on the summit of this rustic altar, which was annually consecrated by the blood of sheep, horses, and of the hundredth captive. Whether human sacrifices formed any part of the worship of Attila, or whether he propitiated the god of war with the victims which he continually offered in the field of battle, the favorite of Mars soon acquired a sacred character, which rendered his conquests more easy and more permanent; and the Barbarian princes confessed, in the language of devotion or flattery, that they could not presume to gaze, with a steady eye, on the divine majesty of the king of the Huns. His brother Bleda, who reigned over a considerable part of the nation, was compelled to resign his sceptre and his life. Yet even this cruel act was attributed to a supernatural impulse; and the vigor with which Attila wielded the sword of Mars, convinced the world that it had been reserved alone for his invincible arm. But the extent of his empire affords the only remaining evidence of the number and importance of his victories; and the Scythian monarch, however ignorant of the value of science and philosophy, might perhaps lament that his illiterate subjects were destitute of the art which could perpetuate the memory of his exploits.
Attila, the son of Mundzuk, believed he came from a noble, maybe even royal, line of the ancient Huns, who had once battled the kings of China. A Gothic historian noted that his features clearly showed his national heritage; the portrait of Attila shows the distinct deformity of a modern Calmuk: a large head, dark skin, small, deep-set eyes, a flat nose, a few hairs in place of a beard, broad shoulders, and a short, square body, muscular but misshapen. The proud stride and demeanor of the king of the Huns reflected his sense of superiority over others; he had a habit of rolling his eyes fiercely as if he wanted to relish the fear he created. Yet, this savage hero wasn't beyond pity; his pleading enemies could trust in his promise of peace or mercy, and his subjects saw him as a fair and lenient ruler. He enjoyed war, but after he took the throne in his adult years, it was his mind rather than his strength that brought him victories in the North; the reputation of a daring soldier was wisely exchanged for that of a clever and successful general. The impact of personal bravery is often trivial, except in poetry or romantic tales, so even among Barbarians, victory relies on how well the emotions of the masses are harnessed and directed to serve one individual. The Scythian conquerors, Attila and Zingis, excelled more in cleverness than in bravery; it's notable that the empires of both the Huns and the Moguls were built on the foundations of popular superstition. The miraculous birth, which deception and gullibility ascribed to the virgin mother of Zingis, elevated him above mere mortals; and the naked prophet who declared him the ruler of the earth gave the feats of the Moguls an irresistible zeal. Attila's religious practices were also cleverly crafted to suit his time and culture. It made sense for the Scythians to worship the god of war, but as they couldn't form abstract ideas or physical representations, they honored their guardian deity using the symbol of an iron scimitar. One of the Huns' shepherds noticed that a heifer grazing had injured its foot and followed the blood trail, discovering the point of an ancient sword hidden in the tall grass, which he dug up and presented to Attila. That noble, or more accurately, that cunning prince accepted this heavenly gift with sincere gratitude; and, as the rightful owner of the sword of Mars, he claimed divine right over the earth. If Scythian rituals were observed on this special occasion, a grand altar, or rather a huge pile of sticks, three hundred yards long and wide, was built in an open field; and the sword of Mars was placed upright on top of this rustic altar, which was annually consecrated with the blood of sheep, horses, and every hundredth captive. Whether human sacrifices were part of Attila's worship, or whether he sought favor with the god of war by offering victims on the battlefield, the favored of Mars soon gained a sacred reputation that made his conquests easier and more lasting; Barbarian princes admitted, through devotion or flattery, that they couldn't dare to look steadily at the divine majesty of the king of the Huns. His brother Bleda, who ruled over a significant part of the nation, was forced to give up both his power and his life. Yet even this brutal act was said to be driven by a supernatural force; and the strength with which Attila wielded the sword of Mars convinced everyone that it was meant solely for his unbeatable hand. However, the vastness of his empire stands as the only remaining proof of the number and significance of his victories; and the Scythian king, though uneducated in science and philosophy, might have regretted that his illiterate subjects lacked the ability to immortalize his achievements.
If a line of separation were drawn between the civilized and the savage climates of the globe; between the inhabitants of cities, who cultivated the earth, and the hunters and shepherds, who dwelt in tents, Attila might aspire to the title of supreme and sole monarch of the Barbarians. He alone, among the conquerors of ancient and modern times, united the two mighty kingdoms of Germany and Scythia; and those vague appellations, when they are applied to his reign, may be understood with an ample latitude. Thuringia, which stretched beyond its actual limits as far as the Danube, was in the number of his provinces; he interposed, with the weight of a powerful neighbor, in the domestic affairs of the Franks; and one of his lieutenants chastised, and almost exterminated, the Burgundians of the Rhine. He subdued the islands of the ocean, the kingdoms of Scandinavia, encompassed and divided by the waters of the Baltic; and the Huns might derive a tribute of furs from that northern region, which has been protected from all other conquerors by the severity of the climate, and the courage of the natives. Towards the East, it is difficult to circumscribe the dominion of Attila over the Scythian deserts; yet we may be assured, that he reigned on the banks of the Volga; that the king of the Huns was dreaded, not only as a warrior, but as a magician; that he insulted and vanquished the khan of the formidable Geougen; and that he sent ambassadors to negotiate an equal alliance with the empire of China. In the proud review of the nations who acknowledged the sovereignty of Attila, and who never entertained, during his lifetime, the thought of a revolt, the Gepidæ and the Ostrogoths were distinguished by their numbers, their bravery, and the personal merits of their chiefs. The renowned Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ, was the faithful and sagacious counsellor of the monarch, who esteemed his intrepid genius, whilst he loved the mild and discreet virtues of the noble Walamir, king of the Ostrogoths. The crowd of vulgar kings, the leaders of so many martial tribes, who served under the standard of Attila, were ranged in the submissive order of guards and domestics round the person of their master. They watched his nod; they trembled at his frown; and at the first signal of his will, they executed, without murmur or hesitation, his stern and absolute commands. In time of peace, the dependent princes, with their national troops, attended the royal camp in regular succession; but when Attila collected his military force, he was able to bring into the field an army of five, or, according to another account, of seven hundred thousand Barbarians.
If you were to draw a line separating the civilized and savage parts of the world; between the city dwellers, who farmed the land, and the hunters and shepherds, who lived in tents, Attila could claim the title of the ultimate ruler of the Barbarians. He alone, among all the conquerors of both ancient and modern times, brought together the vast kingdoms of Germany and Scythia; and those broad terms, when related to his rule, can be understood quite widely. Thuringia, which extended beyond its current borders all the way to the Danube, was one of his territories; he intervened, with the strength of a powerful neighbor, in the internal matters of the Franks; and one of his generals punished and nearly wiped out the Burgundians of the Rhine. He conquered the islands of the ocean, the kingdoms of Scandinavia, bordered and divided by the Baltic waters; and the Huns could collect a tribute of furs from that northern area, which had been shielded from all other conquerors by harsh weather and the bravery of its people. To the East, it's hard to define the extent of Attila's control over the Scythian deserts; however, we can be certain that he ruled along the banks of the Volga; that the king of the Huns was feared not just as a fighter, but as a magician; that he insulted and defeated the khan of the formidable Geougen; and that he sent envoys to negotiate an equal alliance with the Chinese empire. In the grand overview of the nations that acknowledged Attila's dominance, and who never considered rebelling during his life, the Gepidæ and the Ostrogoths stood out for their numbers, bravery, and the personal qualities of their leaders. The famous Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ, was the loyal and wise advisor of the king, who valued his brave spirit, while he appreciated the gentle and sensible qualities of the noble Walamir, king of the Ostrogoths. The multitude of lesser kings, the leaders of numerous warlike tribes, who served under Attila's banner, were arranged in a submissive line as guards and attendants around their master. They paid attention to his commands; they were afraid of his disapproval; and at the first sign of his wishes, they executed his harsh and absolute orders without complaint or delay. In times of peace, the subordinate princes, with their national forces, would regularly attend the royal camp; but when Attila summoned his military might, he could bring forth an army of five, or according to another account, seven hundred thousand Barbarians.
The ambassadors of the Huns might awaken the attention of Theodosius, by reminding him that they were his neighbors both in Europe and Asia; since they touched the Danube on one hand, and reached, with the other, as far as the Tanais. In the reign of his father Arcadius, a band of adventurous Huns had ravaged the provinces of the East; from whence they brought away rich spoils and innumerable captives. They advanced, by a secret path, along the shores of the Caspian Sea; traversed the snowy mountains of Armenia; passed the Tigris, the Euphrates, and the Halys; recruited their weary cavalry with the generous breed of Cappadocian horses; occupied the hilly country of Cilicia, and disturbed the festal songs and dances of the citizens of Antioch. Egypt trembled at their approach; and the monks and pilgrims of the Holy Land prepared to escaped their fury by a speedy embarkation. The memory of this invasion was still recent in the minds of the Orientals. The subjects of Attila might execute, with superior forces, the design which these adventurers had so boldly attempted; and it soon became the subject of anxious conjecture, whether the tempest would fall on the dominions of Rome, or of Persia. Some of the great vassals of the king of the Huns, who were themselves in the rank of powerful princes, had been sent to ratify an alliance and society of arms with the emperor, or rather with the general of the West. They related, during their residence at Rome, the circumstances of an expedition, which they had lately made into the East. After passing a desert and a morass, supposed by the Romans to be the Lake Mæotis, they penetrated through the mountains, and arrived, at the end of fifteen days' march, on the confines of Media; where they advanced as far as the unknown cities of Basic and Cursic. They encountered the Persian army in the plains of Media and the air, according to their own expression, was darkened by a cloud of arrows. But the Huns were obliged to retire before the numbers of the enemy. Their laborious retreat was effected by a different road; they lost the greatest part of their booty; and at length returned to the royal camp, with some knowledge of the country, and an impatient desire of revenge. In the free conversation of the Imperial ambassadors, who discussed, at the court of Attila, the character and designs of their formidable enemy, the ministers of Constantinople expressed their hope, that his strength might be diverted and employed in a long and doubtful contest with the princes of the house of Sassan. The more sagacious Italians admonished their Eastern brethren of the folly and danger of such a hope; and convinced them, that the Medes and Persians were incapable of resisting the arms of the Huns; and that the easy and important acquisition would exalt the pride, as well as power, of the conqueror. Instead of contenting himself with a moderate contribution, and a military title, which equalled him only to the generals of Theodosius, Attila would proceed to impose a disgraceful and intolerable yoke on the necks of the prostrate and captive Romans, who would then be encompassed, on all sides, by the empire of the Huns.
The ambassadors of the Huns might grab Theodosius's attention by reminding him that they were neighbors in both Europe and Asia, touching the Danube on one side and reaching the Tanais on the other. During his father Arcadius's reign, a group of adventurous Huns had attacked the Eastern provinces, bringing back rich treasures and countless captives. They took a secret route along the shores of the Caspian Sea, crossed the snowy mountains of Armenia, and passed the Tigris, Euphrates, and Halys. They replenished their tired cavalry with fine Cappadocian horses, occupied the hilly region of Cilicia, and disrupted the festive songs and dances of the people in Antioch. Egypt shook at their approach, and the monks and pilgrims in the Holy Land prepared to flee their wrath by quickly boarding ships. The memory of this invasion was still fresh in the minds of the Easterners. Attila's forces could carry out the plans these adventurers had boldly attempted, and it soon became a concern whether the storm would hit the lands of Rome or Persia. Some of the major vassals of the king of the Huns, who themselves were powerful princes, were sent to confirm an alliance and military partnership with the emperor, or rather with the general of the West. While in Rome, they shared the details of a recent expedition they undertook in the East. After crossing a desert and a swamp, believed by the Romans to be Lake Mæotis, they navigated through the mountains and, after fifteen days of marching, reached the borders of Media, advancing as far as the unfamiliar cities of Basic and Cursic. They faced the Persian army in the plains of Media, where, according to their own words, the air was darkened by a cloud of arrows. However, the Huns were forced to retreat due to the enemy's numbers. Their exhausting withdrawal took a different route; they lost most of their loot and returned to the royal camp with a better knowledge of the area and a burning desire for revenge. In casual discussions, the Imperial ambassadors who conversed at Attila's court about the character and intentions of their fearsome enemy expressed hope that his strength might be occupied in a long and uncertain conflict with the Sassanid princes. The more perceptive Italians warned their Eastern counterparts about the foolishness and danger of such a hope, convincing them that the Medes and Persians could not withstand the strength of the Huns and that an easy and significant victory would boost the pride and power of the conqueror. Instead of settling for a modest tribute and a military title that would only rank him with Theodosius's generals, Attila would seek to impose a humiliating and unbearable burden on the defeated and captured Romans, who would then find themselves surrounded on all sides by the Hunnic empire.
While the powers of Europe and Asia were solicitous to avert the impending danger, the alliance of Attila maintained the Vandals in the possession of Africa. An enterprise had been concerted between the courts of Ravenna and Constantinople, for the recovery of that valuable province; and the ports of Sicily were already filled with the military and naval forces of Theodosius. But the subtle Genseric, who spread his negotiations round the world, prevented their designs, by exciting the king of the Huns to invade the Eastern empire; and a trifling incident soon became the motive, or pretence, of a destructive war. Under the faith of the treaty of Margus, a free market was held on the Northern side of the Danube, which was protected by a Roman fortress surnamed Constantia. A troop of Barbarians violated the commercial security; killed, or dispersed, the unsuspecting traders; and levelled the fortress with the ground. The Huns justified this outrage as an act of reprisal; alleged, that the bishop of Margus had entered their territories, to discover and steal a secret treasure of their kings; and sternly demanded the guilty prelate, the sacrilegious spoil, and the fugitive subjects, who had escaped from the justice of Attila. The refusal of the Byzantine court was the signal of war; and the Mæsians at first applauded the generous firmness of their sovereign. But they were soon intimidated by the destruction of Viminiacum and the adjacent towns; and the people was persuaded to adopt the convenient maxim, that a private citizen, however innocent or respectable, may be justly sacrificed to the safety of his country. The bishop of Margus, who did not possess the spirit of a martyr, resolved to prevent the designs which he suspected. He boldly treated with the princes of the Huns: secured, by solemn oaths, his pardon and reward; posted a numerous detachment of Barbarians, in silent ambush, on the banks of the Danube; and, at the appointed hour, opened, with his own hand, the gates of his episcopal city. This advantage, which had been obtained by treachery, served as a prelude to more honorable and decisive victories. The Illyrian frontier was covered by a line of castles and fortresses; and though the greatest part of them consisted only of a single tower, with a small garrison, they were commonly sufficient to repel, or to intercept, the inroads of an enemy, who was ignorant of the art, and impatient of the delay, of a regular siege. But these slight obstacles were instantly swept away by the inundation of the Huns. They destroyed, with fire and sword, the populous cities of Sirmium and Singidunum, of Ratiaria and Marcianopolis, of Naissus and Sardica; where every circumstance of the discipline of the people, and the construction of the buildings, had been gradually adapted to the sole purpose of defence. The whole breadth of Europe, as it extends above five hundred miles from the Euxine to the Hadriatic, was at once invaded, and occupied, and desolated, by the myriads of Barbarians whom Attila led into the field. The public danger and distress could not, however, provoke Theodosius to interrupt his amusements and devotion, or to appear in person at the head of the Roman legions. But the troops, which had been sent against Genseric, were hastily recalled from Sicily; the garrisons, on the side of Persia, were exhausted; and a military force was collected in Europe, formidable by their arms and numbers, if the generals had understood the science of command, and the soldiers the duty of obedience. The armies of the Eastern empire were vanquished in three successive engagements; and the progress of Attila may be traced by the fields of battle. The two former, on the banks of the Utus, and under the walls of Marcianopolis, were fought in the extensive plains between the Danube and Mount Hæmus. As the Romans were pressed by a victorious enemy, they gradually, and unskilfully, retired towards the Chersonesus of Thrace; and that narrow peninsula, the last extremity of the land, was marked by their third, and irreparable, defeat. By the destruction of this army, Attila acquired the indisputable possession of the field. From the Hellespont to Thermopylæ, and the suburbs of Constantinople, he ravaged, without resistance, and without mercy, the provinces of Thrace and Macedonia. Heraclea and Hadrianople might, perhaps, escape this dreadful irruption of the Huns; but the words, the most expressive of total extirpation and erasure, are applied to the calamities which they inflicted on seventy cities of the Eastern empire. Theodosius, his court, and the unwarlike people, were protected by the walls of Constantinople; but those walls had been shaken by a recent earthquake, and the fall of fifty-eight towers had opened a large and tremendous breach. The damage indeed was speedily repaired; but this accident was aggravated by a superstitious fear, that Heaven itself had delivered the Imperial city to the shepherds of Scythia, who were strangers to the laws, the language, and the religion, of the Romans.
While the powers of Europe and Asia were eager to prevent the looming danger, Attila's alliance kept the Vandals in control of Africa. A plan had been agreed upon between the courts of Ravenna and Constantinople to reclaim that valuable province, and the ports of Sicily were already filled with the military and naval forces of Theodosius. However, the cunning Genseric, who was negotiating widely, thwarted their plans by encouraging the king of the Huns to invade the Eastern empire, and a trivial incident soon became the reason—or excuse—for a devastating war. Under the treaty of Margus, there was a free market on the northern side of the Danube, protected by a Roman fortress known as Constantia. A group of Barbarians violated the commercial security, killing or scattering the unsuspecting traders, and destroyed the fortress. The Huns justified this attack as revenge, claiming that the bishop of Margus had entered their lands to discover and steal a hidden treasure of their kings, and demanded the guilty bishop, the sacrilegious loot, and the fleeing subjects who had escaped Attila's justice. The refusal of the Byzantine court sparked the war; initially, the Mæsians praised their sovereign's brave stance. But they soon became fearful following the destruction of Viminiacum and nearby towns, leading the people to adopt the convenient idea that an innocent or respected private citizen can justifiably be sacrificed for their country's safety. The bishop of Margus, lacking the spirit of a martyr, decided to thwart the plans he suspected. He boldly negotiated with the Huns' princes, secured his pardon and reward with solemn oaths, stationed a large group of Barbarians in silent ambush along the banks of the Danube, and at the appointed time, opened the gates of his episcopal city. This treacherous advantage led to more honorable and decisive victories. The Illyrian frontier was protected by a line of castles and fortresses; although most were just single towers with small garrisons, they were generally enough to fend off or disrupt the attacks of an enemy who was unfamiliar with the tactics and impatient in a proper siege. But these minor obstacles were quickly swept away by the flood of Huns. They ravaged the populous cities of Sirmium, Singidunum, Ratiaria, Marcianopolis, Naissus, and Sardica, where every aspect of the people's discipline and the construction of the buildings had been gradually adjusted for defense. The whole span of Europe, extending over five hundred miles from the Black Sea to the Adriatic, was suddenly invaded, occupied, and devastated by the countless Barbarians led by Attila. The public threat and distress, however, did not prompt Theodosius to interrupt his leisure activities and religious observances, nor to personally lead the Roman legions. Troops that had been sent against Genseric were hastily recalled from Sicily; garrisons on the Persian front were worn out; and a military force was assembled in Europe, formidable in arms and numbers, if only the generals had understood how to command and the soldiers how to obey. The armies of the Eastern empire were defeated in three successive battles, and Attila's advance can be traced by the battlefields. The first two battles, on the banks of the Utus and outside Marcianopolis, took place in the vast plains between the Danube and Mount Hæmus. As the Romans were pushed back by a victorious enemy, they clumsily retreated toward the Chersonesus of Thrace, where that narrow peninsula, the farthest edge of the land, marked their third and irreparable defeat. With the destruction of this army, Attila gained undisputed control of the territory. From the Hellespont to Thermopylæ and the outskirts of Constantinople, he raided the provinces of Thrace and Macedonia without facing resistance or showing mercy. Perhaps Heraclea and Hadrianople might have escaped this dreadful invasion of the Huns, but the most vivid terms for complete extinction were used to describe the devastation they brought to seventy cities of the Eastern empire. Theodosius, his court, and the peaceful populace were shielded by the walls of Constantinople; however, those walls had been weakened by a recent earthquake, and the fall of fifty-eight towers had created a large and terrifying breach. The damage was quickly repaired, but this incident was intensified by a superstitious fear that Heaven itself had handed over the Imperial city to the Scythian shepherds, who were unfamiliar with the laws, language, and religion of the Romans.
In all their invasions of the civilized empires of the South, the Scythian shepherds have been uniformly actuated by a savage and destructive spirit. The laws of war, that restrain the exercise of national rapine and murder, are founded on two principles of substantial interest: the knowledge of the permanent benefits which may be obtained by a moderate use of conquest; and a just apprehension, lest the desolation which we inflict on the enemy's country may be retaliated on our own. But these considerations of hope and fear are almost unknown in the pastoral state of nations. The Huns of Attila may, without injustice, be compared to the Moguls and Tartars, before their primitive manners were changed by religion and luxury; and the evidence of Oriental history may reflect some light on the short and imperfect annals of Rome. After the Moguls had subdued the northern provinces of China, it was seriously proposed, not in the hour of victory and passion, but in calm deliberate council, to exterminate all the inhabitants of that populous country, that the vacant land might be converted to the pasture of cattle. The firmness of a Chinese mandarin, who insinuated some principles of rational policy into the mind of Zingis, diverted him from the execution of this horrid design. But in the cities of Asia, which yielded to the Moguls, the inhuman abuse of the rights of war was exercised with a regular form of discipline, which may, with equal reason, though not with equal authority, be imputed to the victorious Huns. The inhabitants, who had submitted to their discretion, were ordered to evacuate their houses, and to assemble in some plain adjacent to the city; where a division was made of the vanquished into three parts. The first class consisted of the soldiers of the garrison, and of the young men capable of bearing arms; and their fate was instantly decided: they were either enlisted among the Moguls, or they were massacred on the spot by the troops, who, with pointed spears and bended bows, had formed a circle round the captive multitude. The second class, composed of the young and beautiful women, of the artificers of every rank and profession, and of the more wealthy or honorable citizens, from whom a private ransom might be expected, was distributed in equal or proportionable lots. The remainder, whose life or death was alike useless to the conquerors, were permitted to return to the city; which, in the mean while, had been stripped of its valuable furniture; and a tax was imposed on those wretched inhabitants for the indulgence of breathing their native air. Such was the behavior of the Moguls, when they were not conscious of any extraordinary rigor. But the most casual provocation, the slightest motive of caprice or convenience, often provoked them to involve a whole people in an indiscriminate massacre; and the ruin of some flourishing cities was executed with such unrelenting perseverance, that, according to their own expression, horses might run, without stumbling, over the ground where they had once stood. The three great capitals of Khorasan, Maru, Neisabour, and Herat, were destroyed by the armies of Zingis; and the exact account which was taken of the slain amounted to four millions three hundred and forty-seven thousand persons. Timur, or Tamerlane, was educated in a less barbarous age, and in the profession of the Mahometan religion; yet, if Attila equalled the hostile ravages of Tamerlane, either the Tartar or the Hun might deserve the epithet of the Scourge of God.
In all their invasions of the civilized empires of the South, the Scythian shepherds were driven by a brutal and destructive spirit. The rules of war, which limit the actions of national looting and murder, are based on two key principles of significant interest: the understanding of the lasting benefits that can come from a careful use of conquest; and a reasonable fear that the destruction we impose on an enemy's land might be returned upon us. However, these ideas of hope and fear are nearly absent in societies focused on pastoral living. The Huns of Attila can fairly be compared to the Moguls and Tartars before their ways were changed by religion and luxury; and the evidence from Eastern history can shed light on the brief and imperfect records of Rome. After the Moguls conquered the northern provinces of China, it was seriously suggested—not in the heat of battle, but in calm, reasoned discussion—to wipe out all the residents of that populous land so that the empty land could be turned into cattle pastures. The resolve of a Chinese official, who introduced some rational policies to Zingis, steered him away from this horrific plan. But in the cities of Asia that capitulated to the Moguls, the brutal abuse of warfare rights was executed with a structured discipline that can similarly, though not with the same authority, be applied to the victorious Huns. The inhabitants who surrendered were ordered to leave their homes and gather in an open space near the city; where they were divided into three groups. The first group included the soldiers of the garrison and the young men able to fight; their fate was quickly decided: they were either enlisted among the Moguls or killed on the spot by troops who formed a circle around them with drawn weapons. The second group was made up of young and attractive women, craftsmen of various trades, and wealthier or more respected citizens from whom a private ransom might be hoped for; they were divided into equal or proportional shares. The rest, whose lives held no value for the conquerors, were allowed to return to the city, which, in the meantime, had been stripped of valuable goods; a tax was then imposed on these unfortunate residents for the privilege of living in their homeland. This was the conduct of the Moguls when they felt no need for extraordinary cruelty. Yet, even the slightest provocation or capricious reason often led them to carry out indiscriminate massacres of entire populations; the destruction of some prosperous cities was done with such relentless determination that, in their own words, horses could run without stumbling over the ground where they had once stood. The three principal capitals of Khorasan—Maru, Neisabour, and Herat—were destroyed by Zingis's armies, with the recorded death toll reaching four million three hundred and forty-seven thousand people. Timur, or Tamerlane, was raised in a less savage era and in the Islamic faith; yet, if Attila matched the destructive campaigns of Tamerlane, either the Tartar or the Hun could be rightly called the Scourge of God.
Chapter XXXIV: Attila.—Part II.
It may be affirmed, with bolder assurance, that the Huns depopulated the provinces of the empire, by the number of Roman subjects whom they led away into captivity. In the hands of a wise legislator, such an industrious colony might have contributed to diffuse through the deserts of Scythia the rudiments of the useful and ornamental arts; but these captives, who had been taken in war, were accidentally dispersed among the hordes that obeyed the empire of Attila. The estimate of their respective value was formed by the simple judgment of unenlightened and unprejudiced Barbarians. Perhaps they might not understand the merit of a theologian, profoundly skilled in the controversies of the Trinity and the Incarnation; yet they respected the ministers of every religion and the active zeal of the Christian missionaries, without approaching the person or the palace of the monarch, successfully labored in the propagation of the gospel. The pastoral tribes, who were ignorant of the distinction of landed property, must have disregarded the use, as well as the abuse, of civil jurisprudence; and the skill of an eloquent lawyer could excite only their contempt or their abhorrence. The perpetual intercourse of the Huns and the Goths had communicated the familiar knowledge of the two national dialects; and the Barbarians were ambitious of conversing in Latin, the military idiom even of the Eastern empire. But they disdained the language and the sciences of the Greeks; and the vain sophist, or grave philosopher, who had enjoyed the flattering applause of the schools, was mortified to find that his robust servant was a captive of more value and importance than himself. The mechanic arts were encouraged and esteemed, as they tended to satisfy the wants of the Huns. An architect in the service of Onegesius, one of the favorites of Attila, was employed to construct a bath; but this work was a rare example of private luxury; and the trades of the smith, the carpenter, the armorer, were much more adapted to supply a wandering people with the useful instruments of peace and war. But the merit of the physician was received with universal favor and respect: the Barbarians, who despised death, might be apprehensive of disease; and the haughty conqueror trembled in the presence of a captive, to whom he ascribed, perhaps, an imaginary power of prolonging or preserving his life. The Huns might be provoked to insult the misery of their slaves, over whom they exercised a despotic command; but their manners were not susceptible of a refined system of oppression; and the efforts of courage and diligence were often recompensed by the gift of freedom. The historian Priscus, whose embassy is a source of curious instruction, was accosted in the camp of Attila by a stranger, who saluted him in the Greek language, but whose dress and figure displayed the appearance of a wealthy Scythian. In the siege of Viminiacum, he had lost, according to his own account, his fortune and liberty; he became the slave of Onegesius; but his faithful services, against the Romans and the Acatzires, had gradually raised him to the rank of the native Huns; to whom he was attached by the domestic pledges of a new wife and several children. The spoils of war had restored and improved his private property; he was admitted to the table of his former lord; and the apostate Greek blessed the hour of his captivity, since it had been the introduction to a happy and independent state; which he held by the honorable tenure of military service. This reflection naturally produced a dispute on the advantages and defects of the Roman government, which was severely arraigned by the apostate, and defended by Priscus in a prolix and feeble declamation. The freedman of Onegesius exposed, in true and lively colors, the vices of a declining empire, of which he had so long been the victim; the cruel absurdity of the Roman princes, unable to protect their subjects against the public enemy, unwilling to trust them with arms for their own defence; the intolerable weight of taxes, rendered still more oppressive by the intricate or arbitrary modes of collection; the obscurity of numerous and contradictory laws; the tedious and expensive forms of judicial proceedings; the partial administration of justice; and the universal corruption, which increased the influence of the rich, and aggravated the misfortunes of the poor. A sentiment of patriotic sympathy was at length revived in the breast of the fortunate exile; and he lamented, with a flood of tears, the guilt or weakness of those magistrates who had perverted the wisest and most salutary institutions.
It can be confidently said that the Huns wiped out the populations of the empire’s provinces by taking many Romans captive. In the hands of a capable leader, this hardworking group could have spread essential and decorative arts across the Scythian deserts; however, these war captives were scattered among the tribes that followed Attila. Their worth was judged by the straightforward assessments of uninformed and unbiased Barbarians. They might not have appreciated the value of a theologian well-versed in debates about the Trinity and the Incarnation, but they respected leaders of all faiths and admired the dedication of Christian missionaries, who worked diligently to spread the gospel without approaching the king or his palace. The nomadic tribes, who didn't recognize land ownership, likely ignored the uses and misuses of civil law; in fact, the eloquence of a skilled lawyer might only earn their scorn. Ongoing contact between the Huns and Goths had led to a shared understanding of both groups' languages; the Barbarians aspired to speak Latin, the military language even in the Eastern Empire. They looked down on Greek language and knowledge, and the pompous sophists or serious philosophers who enjoyed accolades in academic circles were humiliated to find that their strong servant was valued as more important than they were. The practical arts were encouraged and appreciated because they helped meet the Huns' needs. An architect working for Onegesius, one of Attila’s favorites, was tasked with building a bath, but this was an unusual case of private luxury; the trades of blacksmiths, carpenters, and armorers were far more suited for providing the tools of peace and war for a nomadic people. However, the skills of a physician were universally valued and respected: the Barbarians, who dismissed death, might fear illness; and the proud conqueror felt nervous around a captive whom he believed possessed an imagined ability to extend or safeguard his life. The Huns could be provoked to mock their enslaved people, whom they ruled over with absolute power, but their behavior was not refined enough to maintain a complex system of oppression; and acts of bravery and hard work were often rewarded with freedom. The historian Priscus, whose diplomatic mission offers intriguing insights, was approached in Attila's camp by a stranger who greeted him in Greek, yet whose clothing and appearance marked him as a wealthy Scythian. During the siege of Viminiacum, he claimed to have lost both his fortune and freedom, becoming Onegesius’s slave; however, his loyal service against the Romans and Acatzires had gradually elevated him to the status of the native Huns, whom he was connected to through the domestic ties of a new wife and several children. The spoils of war had restored and enhanced his personal wealth; he was welcomed at the table of his former master, and the defector Greek praised the moment of his captivity, as it led him to a fortunate and independent life, secured by honorable military service. This reflection sparked a debate about the pros and cons of Roman governance, which the defector harshly criticized and Priscus defended in a long-winded and weak argument. Onegesius's freedman vividly pointed out the flaws of a declining empire, of which he had been a victim for so long; the cruel absurdity of Roman leaders unable to protect their people from external threats and unwilling to arm them for self-defense; the unbearable burden of taxes, made even more excessive by convoluted or arbitrary collection methods; the confusing legal system filled with contradictory laws; the lengthy and costly legal processes; the biased justice system; and rampant corruption that amplified the wealthy's power while worsening the plight of the poor. In the end, a sense of patriotic concern was rekindled in the fortunate exile, and he wept bitterly over the guilt or weaknesses of the officials who had corrupted the most wise and beneficial institutions.
The timid or selfish policy of the Western Romans had abandoned the Eastern empire to the Huns. The loss of armies, and the want of discipline or virtue, were not supplied by the personal character of the monarch. Theodosius might still affect the style, as well as the title, of Invincible Augustus; but he was reduced to solicit the clemency of Attila, who imperiously dictated these harsh and humiliating conditions of peace. I. The emperor of the East resigned, by an express or tacit convention, an extensive and important territory, which stretched along the southern banks of the Danube, from Singidunum, or Belgrade, as far as Novæ, in the diocese of Thrace. The breadth was defined by the vague computation of fifteen days' journey; but, from the proposal of Attila to remove the situation of the national market, it soon appeared, that he comprehended the ruined city of Naissus within the limits of his dominions. II. The king of the Huns required and obtained, that his tribute or subsidy should be augmented from seven hundred pounds of gold to the annual sum of two thousand one hundred; and he stipulated the immediate payment of six thousand pounds of gold, to defray the expenses, or to expiate the guilt, of the war. One might imagine, that such a demand, which scarcely equalled the measure of private wealth, would have been readily discharged by the opulent empire of the East; and the public distress affords a remarkable proof of the impoverished, or at least of the disorderly, state of the finances. A large proportion of the taxes extorted from the people was detained and intercepted in their passage, though the foulest channels, to the treasury of Constantinople. The revenue was dissipated by Theodosius and his favorites in wasteful and profuse luxury; which was disguised by the names of Imperial magnificence, or Christian charity. The immediate supplies had been exhausted by the unforeseen necessity of military preparations. A personal contribution, rigorously, but capriciously, imposed on the members of the senatorian order, was the only expedient that could disarm, without loss of time, the impatient avarice of Attila; and the poverty of the nobles compelled them to adopt the scandalous resource of exposing to public auction the jewels of their wives, and the hereditary ornaments of their palaces. III. The king of the Huns appears to have established, as a principle of national jurisprudence, that he could never lose the property, which he had once acquired, in the persons who had yielded either a voluntary, or reluctant, submission to his authority. From this principle he concluded, and the conclusions of Attila were irrevocable laws, that the Huns, who had been taken prisoner in war, should be released without delay, and without ransom; that every Roman captive, who had presumed to escape, should purchase his right to freedom at the price of twelve pieces of gold; and that all the Barbarians, who had deserted the standard of Attila, should be restored, without any promise or stipulation of pardon. In the execution of this cruel and ignominious treaty, the Imperial officers were forced to massacre several loyal and noble deserters, who refused to devote themselves to certain death; and the Romans forfeited all reasonable claims to the friendship of any Scythian people, by this public confession, that they were destitute either of faith, or power, to protect the suppliant, who had embraced the throne of Theodosius.
The timid or selfish approach of the Western Romans had left the Eastern empire vulnerable to the Huns. The loss of armies and the lack of discipline or virtue couldn’t be compensated for by the personal character of the emperor. Theodosius might still try to portray himself as the Invincible Augustus, but he was forced to seek mercy from Attila, who harshly dictated tough and humiliating peace terms. I. The emperor of the East surrendered, either explicitly or implicitly, a vast and important area, stretching along the southern banks of the Danube, from Singidunum, or Belgrade, to Novæ, in Thrace. The width was vaguely measured as a fifteen-day journey; however, it soon became clear from Attila's proposal to relocate the national market that he intended to include the ruined city of Naissus within his territory. II. The king of the Huns demanded and received an increase in tribute from seven hundred pounds of gold to an annual total of two thousand one hundred; he also required an immediate payment of six thousand pounds of gold, either to cover war costs or to atone for the conflict. One might think that such a demand, which barely matched the wealth of private citizens, would have been easily met by the wealthy Eastern empire; yet, the public distress provides a striking example of the impoverished, or at least chaotic, state of its finances. A large portion of the taxes collected from the people was lost or intercepted on the way to the treasury in Constantinople. The revenue was squandered by Theodosius and his favorites on extravagant luxury, disguised as Imperial grandeur or Christian charity. The immediate funds had been drained by the unexpected need for military preparations. The only option to quickly appease Attila's insatiable greed was a personal contribution that was strictly, but arbitrarily, imposed on the senators; the nobles were forced by their poverty to resort to the disgraceful act of auctioning off their wives’ jewelry and the heirlooms from their estates. III. The king of the Huns seemed to have established a legal principle that he could never lose property he had acquired from individuals who had submitted to his rule, whether willingly or reluctantly. From this principle, he concluded—and his conclusions were irrevocable laws—that Huns captured in warfare should be released immediately and without ransom; that any Roman captive who dared to escape should have to pay twelve pieces of gold for their freedom; and that all Barbarians who had deserted Attila's cause should be returned without any promise of forgiveness. In carrying out this cruel and disgraceful treaty, Imperial officers were compelled to kill several loyal and noble deserters who refused to accept certain death; the Romans thus forfeited any reasonable claims to the friendship of any Scythian people by publicly admitting their inability to protect the supplicants who had turned to Theodosius for help.
The firmness of a single town, so obscure, that, except on this occasion, it has never been mentioned by any historian or geographer, exposed the disgrace of the emperor and empire. Azimus, or Azimuntium, a small city of Thrace on the Illyrian borders, had been distinguished by the martial spirit of its youth, the skill and reputation of the leaders whom they had chosen, and their daring exploits against the innumerable host of the Barbarians. Instead of tamely expecting their approach, the Azimuntines attacked, in frequent and successful sallies, the troops of the Huns, who gradually declined the dangerous neighborhood, rescued from their hands the spoil and the captives, and recruited their domestic force by the voluntary association of fugitives and deserters. After the conclusion of the treaty, Attila still menaced the empire with implacable war, unless the Azimuntines were persuaded, or compelled, to comply with the conditions which their sovereign had accepted. The ministers of Theodosius confessed with shame, and with truth, that they no longer possessed any authority over a society of men, who so bravely asserted their natural independence; and the king of the Huns condescended to negotiate an equal exchange with the citizens of Azimus. They demanded the restitution of some shepherds, who, with their cattle, had been accidentally surprised. A strict, though fruitless, inquiry was allowed: but the Huns were obliged to swear, that they did not detain any prisoners belonging to the city, before they could recover two surviving countrymen, whom the Azimuntines had reserved as pledges for the safety of their lost companions. Attila, on his side, was satisfied, and deceived, by their solemn asseveration, that the rest of the captives had been put to the sword; and that it was their constant practice, immediately to dismiss the Romans and the deserters, who had obtained the security of the public faith. This prudent and officious dissimulation may be condemned, or excused, by the casuists, as they incline to the rigid decree of St. Augustin, or to the milder sentiment of St. Jerom and St. Chrysostom: but every soldier, every statesman, must acknowledge, that, if the race of the Azimuntines had been encouraged and multiplied, the Barbarians would have ceased to trample on the majesty of the empire.
The strength of a single town, so little known that it has hardly ever been mentioned by any historian or geographer except for this occasion, highlighted the shame of the emperor and the empire. Azimus, or Azimuntium, a small city in Thrace near the borders of Illyria, was renowned for the fighting spirit of its young people, the skill and reputation of their chosen leaders, and their bold actions against the countless Barbarian forces. Instead of waiting passively for their arrival, the Azimuntines frequently launched successful attacks against the Huns, who slowly retreated from the area, freeing captives and recovering their loot, while also increasing their local strength by welcoming refugees and deserters into their ranks. After the treaty was signed, Attila continued to threaten the empire with relentless war unless the Azimuntines were persuaded or forced to accept the terms their ruler had agreed to. The ministers of Theodosius admitted, with both shame and honesty, that they had lost all authority over a group of people who boldly claimed their natural independence; meanwhile, the king of the Huns agreed to negotiate a fair exchange with the people of Azimus. They asked for the return of some shepherds who had been caught off guard along with their livestock. A thorough, though ultimately useless, investigation was carried out; however, the Huns had to swear that they were not holding any prisoners from the city before they could get back two surviving locals, whom the Azimuntines had kept as guarantees for the safety of their missing companions. Attila, for his part, was satisfied and misled by their serious promises that the other captives had been killed, and that it was their regular practice to immediately release the Romans and deserters who had received the protection of the public faith. This careful and strategic deception might be judged harshly or justified by moralists, depending on their leanings towards the strict views of St. Augustine or the more lenient opinions of St. Jerome and St. Chrysostom: but every soldier and statesman must agree that if the Azimuntine population had been encouraged and allowed to grow, the Barbarians would have stopped trampling on the authority of the empire.
It would have been strange, indeed, if Theodosius had purchased, by the loss of honor, a secure and solid tranquillity, or if his tameness had not invited the repetition of injuries. The Byzantine court was insulted by five or six successive embassies; and the ministers of Attila were uniformly instructed to press the tardy or imperfect execution of the last treaty; to produce the names of fugitives and deserters, who were still protected by the empire; and to declare, with seeming moderation, that, unless their sovereign obtained complete and immediate satisfaction, it would be impossible for him, were it even his wish, to check the resentment of his warlike tribes. Besides the motives of pride and interest, which might prompt the king of the Huns to continue this train of negotiation, he was influenced by the less honorable view of enriching his favorites at the expense of his enemies. The Imperial treasury was exhausted, to procure the friendly offices of the ambassadors and their principal attendants, whose favorable report might conduce to the maintenance of peace. The Barbarian monarch was flattered by the liberal reception of his ministers; he computed, with pleasure, the value and splendor of their gifts, rigorously exacted the performance of every promise which would contribute to their private emolument, and treated as an important business of state the marriage of his secretary Constantius. That Gallic adventurer, who was recommended by Ætius to the king of the Huns, had engaged his service to the ministers of Constantinople, for the stipulated reward of a wealthy and noble wife; and the daughter of Count Saturninus was chosen to discharge the obligations of her country. The reluctance of the victim, some domestic troubles, and the unjust confiscation of her fortune, cooled the ardor of her interested lover; but he still demanded, in the name of Attila, an equivalent alliance; and, after many ambiguous delays and excuses, the Byzantine court was compelled to sacrifice to this insolent stranger the widow of Armatius, whose birth, opulence, and beauty, placed her in the most illustrious rank of the Roman matrons. For these importunate and oppressive embassies, Attila claimed a suitable return: he weighed, with suspicious pride, the character and station of the Imperial envoys; but he condescended to promise that he would advance as far as Sardica to receive any ministers who had been invested with the consular dignity. The council of Theodosius eluded this proposal, by representing the desolate and ruined condition of Sardica, and even ventured to insinuate that every officer of the army or household was qualified to treat with the most powerful princes of Scythia. Maximin, a respectable courtier, whose abilities had been long exercised in civil and military employments, accepted, with reluctance, the troublesome, and perhaps dangerous, commission of reconciling the angry spirit of the king of the Huns. His friend, the historian Priscus, embraced the opportunity of observing the Barbarian hero in the peaceful and domestic scenes of life: but the secret of the embassy, a fatal and guilty secret, was intrusted only to the interpreter Vigilius. The two last ambassadors of the Huns, Orestes, a noble subject of the Pannonian province, and Edecon, a valiant chieftain of the tribe of the Scyrri, returned at the same time from Constantinople to the royal camp. Their obscure names were afterwards illustrated by the extraordinary fortune and the contrast of their sons: the two servants of Attila became the fathers of the last Roman emperor of the West, and of the first Barbarian king of Italy.
It would have been really strange if Theodosius had bought secure and solid peace at the cost of his honor, or if his passivity hadn’t encouraged further injuries. The Byzantine court faced insults from five or six successive embassies, and Attila’s ministers were consistently directed to demand the slow or incomplete fulfillment of the last treaty. They needed to list the names of refugees and deserters who were still being protected by the empire and to state, with feigned moderation, that unless their ruler received complete and immediate satisfaction, he wouldn’t be able to contain the anger of his warlike tribes, even if he wanted to. Aside from pride and self-interest, which might motivate the King of the Huns to continue negotiations, he was also motivated by the less honorable intention of enriching his favorites at the expense of his enemies. The Imperial treasury was drained to secure the goodwill of the ambassadors and their main attendants, whose positive reports could help maintain peace. The Barbarian king was pleased by the generous reception of his ministers; he calculated with delight the value and splendor of their gifts, strictly enforced the fulfillment of every promise that would benefit their personal gain, and treated the marriage of his secretary Constantius as a significant state matter. That Gallic adventurer, recommended by Ætius to the king of the Huns, had pledged his service to the ministers of Constantinople for the promised reward of a wealthy and noble wife, and the daughter of Count Saturninus was selected to fulfill her country’s obligations. The reluctance of the bride, some family issues, and the unjust seizure of her fortune dampened the enthusiasm of her interested suitor; however, he still demanded, in Attila's name, an equivalent alliance. After many vague delays and excuses, the Byzantine court was forced to give in to this arrogant stranger and offer the widow of Armatius, who was of high birth, wealth, and beauty, placing her among the most esteemed of Roman matrons. For these relentless and burdensome embassies, Attila expected suitable compensation: he scrutinized the character and status of the Imperial envoys with suspicious pride but agreed to promise he would travel as far as Sardica to meet any envoys who held consular rank. The council of Theodosius evaded this request by highlighting the devastated and ruined state of Sardica and suggested that any officer of the army or household was qualified to negotiate with the most powerful princes of Scythia. Maximin, a respected courtier whose skills had long been tested in civil and military roles, reluctantly accepted the challenging and possibly dangerous task of reconciling the angry spirit of the King of the Huns. His friend, the historian Priscus, took the chance to observe the Barbarian hero in peaceful and domestic situations, but the secret of the embassy, a fatal and guilty secret, was entrusted only to the interpreter Vigilius. The last two ambassadors of the Huns, Orestes, a nobleman from the Pannonian province, and Edecon, a brave chieftain from the tribe of the Scyrri, returned at the same time from Constantinople to the royal camp. Their obscure names would later be made famous by the remarkable fortunes and contrasts of their sons: the two servants of Attila became the fathers of the last Roman emperor of the West and the first Barbarian king of Italy.
The ambassadors, who were followed by a numerous train of men and horses, made their first halt at Sardica, at the distance of three hundred and fifty miles, or thirteen days' journey, from Constantinople. As the remains of Sardica were still included within the limits of the empire, it was incumbent on the Romans to exercise the duties of hospitality. They provided, with the assistance of the provincials, a sufficient number of sheep and oxen, and invited the Huns to a splendid, or at least, a plentiful supper. But the harmony of the entertainment was soon disturbed by mutual prejudice and indiscretion. The greatness of the emperor and the empire was warmly maintained by their ministers; the Huns, with equal ardor, asserted the superiority of their victorious monarch: the dispute was inflamed by the rash and unseasonable flattery of Vigilius, who passionately rejected the comparison of a mere mortal with the divine Theodosius; and it was with extreme difficulty that Maximin and Priscus were able to divert the conversation, or to soothe the angry minds, of the Barbarians. When they rose from table, the Imperial ambassador presented Edecon and Orestes with rich gifts of silk robes and Indian pearls, which they thankfully accepted. Yet Orestes could not forbear insinuating that he had not always been treated with such respect and liberality: and the offensive distinction which was implied, between his civil office and the hereditary rank of his colleague seems to have made Edecon a doubtful friend, and Orestes an irreconcilable enemy. After this entertainment, they travelled about one hundred miles from Sardica to Naissus. That flourishing city, which has given birth to the great Constantine, was levelled with the ground: the inhabitants were destroyed or dispersed; and the appearance of some sick persons, who were still permitted to exist among the ruins of the churches, served only to increase the horror of the prospect. The surface of the country was covered with the bones of the slain; and the ambassadors, who directed their course to the north-west, were obliged to pass the hills of modern Servia, before they descended into the flat and marshy grounds which are terminated by the Danube. The Huns were masters of the great river: their navigation was performed in large canoes, hollowed out of the trunk of a single tree; the ministers of Theodosius were safely landed on the opposite bank; and their Barbarian associates immediately hastened to the camp of Attila, which was equally prepared for the amusements of hunting or of war. No sooner had Maximin advanced about two miles from the Danube, than he began to experience the fastidious insolence of the conqueror. He was sternly forbid to pitch his tents in a pleasant valley, lest he should infringe the distant awe that was due to the royal mansion. The ministers of Attila pressed them to communicate the business, and the instructions, which he reserved for the ear of their sovereign. When Maximin temperately urged the contrary practice of nations, he was still more confounded to find that the resolutions of the Sacred Consistory, those secrets (says Priscus) which should not be revealed to the gods themselves, had been treacherously disclosed to the public enemy. On his refusal to comply with such ignominious terms, the Imperial envoy was commanded instantly to depart; the order was recalled; it was again repeated; and the Huns renewed their ineffectual attempts to subdue the patient firmness of Maximin. At length, by the intercession of Scotta, the brother of Onegesius, whose friendship had been purchased by a liberal gift, he was admitted to the royal presence; but, in stead of obtaining a decisive answer, he was compelled to undertake a remote journey towards the north, that Attila might enjoy the proud satisfaction of receiving, in the same camp, the ambassadors of the Eastern and Western empires. His journey was regulated by the guides, who obliged him to halt, to hasten his march, or to deviate from the common road, as it best suited the convenience of the king. The Romans, who traversed the plains of Hungary, suppose that they passed several navigable rivers, either in canoes or portable boats; but there is reason to suspect that the winding stream of the Teyss, or Tibiscus, might present itself in different places under different names. From the contiguous villages they received a plentiful and regular supply of provisions; mead instead of wine, millet in the place of bread, and a certain liquor named camus, which according to the report of Priscus, was distilled from barley. Such fare might appear coarse and indelicate to men who had tasted the luxury of Constantinople; but, in their accidental distress, they were relieved by the gentleness and hospitality of the same Barbarians, so terrible and so merciless in war. The ambassadors had encamped on the edge of a large morass. A violent tempest of wind and rain, of thunder and lightning, overturned their tents, immersed their baggage and furniture in the water, and scattered their retinue, who wandered in the darkness of the night, uncertain of their road, and apprehensive of some unknown danger, till they awakened by their cries the inhabitants of a neighboring village, the property of the widow of Bleda. A bright illumination, and, in a few moments, a comfortable fire of reeds, was kindled by their officious benevolence; the wants, and even the desires, of the Romans were liberally satisfied; and they seem to have been embarrassed by the singular politeness of Bleda's widow, who added to her other favors the gift, or at least the loan, of a sufficient number of beautiful and obsequious damsels. The sunshine of the succeeding day was dedicated to repose, to collect and dry the baggage, and to the refreshment of the men and horses: but, in the evening, before they pursued their journey, the ambassadors expressed their gratitude to the bounteous lady of the village, by a very acceptable present of silver cups, red fleeces, dried fruits, and Indian pepper. Soon after this adventure, they rejoined the march of Attila, from whom they had been separated about six days, and slowly proceeded to the capital of an empire, which did not contain, in the space of several thousand miles, a single city.
The ambassadors, followed by a large group of men and horses, made their first stop at Sardica, which was three hundred and fifty miles, or a thirteen-day journey, from Constantinople. Since Sardica was still within the empire's borders, the Romans had to show hospitality. With help from the locals, they provided enough sheep and oxen and invited the Huns to a lavish, or at least plentiful, supper. However, the harmony of the event was soon disrupted by mutual bias and indiscretion. The greatness of the emperor and the empire was strongly defended by their ministers; the Huns, equally passionate, asserted the superiority of their victorious king. The argument was fueled by the reckless and poorly timed flattery of Vigilius, who fervently dismissed the idea of comparing a mere mortal to the divine Theodosius; it took Maximin and Priscus a lot of effort to redirect the conversation and calm the anger of the Barbarians. When they finished their meal, the Imperial ambassador gave Edecon and Orestes lavish gifts of silk robes and Indian pearls, which they graciously accepted. Yet Orestes couldn't help but hint that he hadn't always been treated with such respect and generosity: the implied distinction between his civil position and the hereditary status of his colleague seemed to make Edecon a questionable ally and Orestes a permanent enemy. After this feast, they traveled about a hundred miles from Sardica to Naissus. That thriving city, the birthplace of the great Constantine, was now reduced to rubble: the inhabitants were killed or scattered, and the sight of a few sick people, still allowed to live among the ruins of the churches, only heightened the horror of the scene. The ground was covered with the bones of the dead; and as the ambassadors traveled northwest, they were forced to cross the hills of modern Servia before reaching the flat, marshy lands that led to the Danube. The Huns controlled the great river; their navigation was done in large canoes carved from single tree trunks; the ministers of Theodosius were safely landed on the other side; and their Barbarian allies quickly made their way to Attila's camp, which was prepared for both hunting and war. No sooner had Maximin moved about two miles from the Danube than he encountered the demanding arrogance of the conqueror. He was sternly prohibited from setting up his tents in a pleasant valley, lest he disrupt the distant reverence owed to the royal residence. Attila's ministers urged them to reveal the business and instructions meant for the ears of their sovereign. When Maximin calmly pointed out the opposite practice of other nations, he was even more stunned to discover that the secrets of the Sacred Consistory, those matters (as Priscus put it) that should not be disclosed even to the gods, had been treacherously revealed to the public enemy. Upon his refusal to accept such degrading terms, the Imperial envoy was ordered to leave immediately; the command was rescinded; it was repeated; and the Huns kept trying unsuccessfully to break the patient resolve of Maximin. Eventually, through the mediation of Scotta, the brother of Onegesius, whose friendship had been won by a generous gift, he was granted an audience with the king; but instead of getting a decisive answer, he was forced to undertake a lengthy journey to the north so Attila could enjoy the pride of receiving the ambassadors of the Eastern and Western empires in the same camp. His journey was managed by guides, who made him stop, hurry, or stray from the usual path as it suited the convenience of the king. The Romans, traveling through the plains of Hungary, believed they crossed several navigable rivers, either in canoes or portable boats; but it seems that the winding stream of the Teyss, or Tibiscus, might have appeared under different names in various locations. From nearby villages, they received a steady and plentiful supply of provisions: mead instead of wine, millet instead of bread, and a drink called camus, which, according to Priscus, was made from barley. Such fare might seem simple and unrefined to those who had savored the luxuries of Constantinople; however, in their moment of need, they were helped by the kindness and hospitality of those same Barbarians, who were so fierce and merciless in warfare. The ambassadors had set up camp near a large swamp. A fierce storm of wind and rain, along with thunder and lightning, knocked down their tents, soaked their belongings and furniture, and scattered their followers, who wandered in the darkness of night, unsure of their path and fearful of unknown dangers, until their cries awakened the residents of a nearby village owned by the widow of Bleda. Bright lights were quickly arranged, and soon a cozy fire made from reeds was kindled by their eager generosity; the needs, and even the wants, of the Romans were generously met, and they seemed taken aback by the unusual courtesy of Bleda's widow, who added to her other kindnesses the gift, or at least the loan, of several beautiful and attentive young women. The next day was designated for rest, to gather and dry their belongings, and to refresh the men and horses; but in the evening, before continuing their journey, the ambassadors showed their appreciation to the generous lady of the village with a welcome gift of silver cups, red woolen cloaks, dried fruits, and Indian pepper. Soon after this experience, they rejoined Attila’s march, from which they had been separated for approximately six days, and gradually made their way to the capital of an empire that did not have a single city within thousands of miles.
As far as we may ascertain the vague and obscure geography of Priscus, this capital appears to have been seated between the Danube, the Teyss, and the Carpathian hills, in the plains of Upper Hungary, and most probably in the neighborhood of Jezberin, Agria, or Tokay. In its origin it could be no more than an accidental camp, which, by the long and frequent residence of Attila, had insensibly swelled into a huge village, for the reception of his court, of the troops who followed his person, and of the various multitude of idle or industrious slaves and retainers. The baths, constructed by Onegesius, were the only edifice of stone; the materials had been transported from Pannonia; and since the adjacent country was destitute even of large timber, it may be presumed, that the meaner habitations of the royal village consisted of straw, or mud, or of canvass. The wooden houses of the more illustrious Huns were built and adorned with rude magnificence, according to the rank, the fortune, or the taste of the proprietors. They seem to have been distributed with some degree of order and symmetry; and each spot became more honorable as it approached the person of the sovereign. The palace of Attila, which surpassed all other houses in his dominions, was built entirely of wood, and covered an ample space of ground. The outward enclosure was a lofty wall, or palisade, of smooth square timber, intersected with high towers, but intended rather for ornament than defence. This wall, which seems to have encircled the declivity of a hill, comprehended a great variety of wooden edifices, adapted to the uses of royalty. A separate house was assigned to each of the numerous wives of Attila; and, instead of the rigid and illiberal confinement imposed by Asiatic jealousy they politely admitted the Roman ambassadors to their presence, their table, and even to the freedom of an innocent embrace. When Maximin offered his presents to Cerca, the principal queen, he admired the singular architecture on her mansion, the height of the round columns, the size and beauty of the wood, which was curiously shaped or turned or polished or carved; and his attentive eye was able to discover some taste in the ornaments and some regularity in the proportions. After passing through the guards, who watched before the gate, the ambassadors were introduced into the private apartment of Cerca. The wife of Attila received their visit sitting, or rather lying, on a soft couch; the floor was covered with a carpet; the domestics formed a circle round the queen; and her damsels, seated on the ground, were employed in working the variegated embroidery which adorned the dress of the Barbaric warriors. The Huns were ambitious of displaying those riches which were the fruit and evidence of their victories: the trappings of their horses, their swords, and even their shoes, were studded with gold and precious stones; and their tables were profusely spread with plates, and goblets, and vases of gold and silver, which had been fashioned by the labor of Grecian artists. The monarch alone assumed the superior pride of still adhering to the simplicity of his Scythian ancestors. The dress of Attila, his arms, and the furniture of his horse, were plain, without ornament, and of a single color. The royal table was served in wooden cups and platters; flesh was his only food; and the conqueror of the North never tasted the luxury of bread.
As far as we can determine from the unclear and obscure geography of Priscus, this capital seems to have been located between the Danube, the Teyss, and the Carpathian mountains, in the plains of Upper Hungary, likely near Jezberin, Agria, or Tokay. Initially, it was probably just a temporary camp that, due to Attila's long and frequent stays, gradually expanded into a large village to accommodate his court, the troops that followed him, and a diverse crowd of idle or working slaves and followers. The baths built by Onegesius were the only stone structure; the materials were brought in from Pannonia, and since the surrounding area lacked even large trees, it's likely that the simpler homes in the royal village were made of straw, mud, or canvas. The wooden houses of the more prominent Huns were constructed and decorated with rough grandeur, depending on the rank, wealth, or taste of their owners. They appeared to be arranged with some level of order and symmetry, with each location becoming more prestigious as it got closer to the sovereign. Attila's palace, which was the largest residence in his realm, was completely made of wood and covered a large area. The outer enclosure consisted of a tall wall or palisade made from smooth square timber, featuring high towers, mainly for decoration rather than defense. This wall seems to have surrounded the slope of a hill and contained a variety of wooden structures suited for royal purposes. A separate house was designated for each of Attila's many wives; instead of the strict and narrow confinement typical of Asian jealousy, they graciously allowed Roman ambassadors to visit them, share meals, and even engage in harmless embraces. When Maximin presented his gifts to Cerca, the main queen, he admired the unique architecture of her house, the height of the round columns, and the large, beautiful timber, which was intricately shaped, polished, or carved; his keen eye could spot some artistry in the decorations and some order in the proportions. After getting past the guards at the gate, the ambassadors were led into Cerca's private quarters. Attila's wife welcomed them while either sitting or lying on a soft couch; the floor was covered with a carpet; servants formed a circle around the queen, and her maidens sat on the ground, busy with the colorful embroidery that adorned the clothing of the Barbarian warriors. The Huns were eager to showcase the wealth resulting from their victories: the decorations on their horses, their swords, and even their footwear were set with gold and gemstones, and their tables were lavishly laid with plates, goblets, and vases made of gold and silver, crafted by Greek artisans. The king alone chose to maintain the simple pride of his Scythian ancestors. Attila's clothing, his weapons, and his horse's gear were plain, unadorned, and in a single color. The royal table was served with wooden cups and plates; meat was his only food, and the conqueror of the North never tasted the luxury of bread.
When Attila first gave audience to the Roman ambassadors on the banks of the Danube, his tent was encompassed with a formidable guard. The monarch himself was seated in a wooden chair. His stern countenance, angry gestures, and impatient tone, astonished the firmness of Maximin; but Vigilius had more reason to tremble, since he distinctly understood the menace, that if Attila did not respect the law of nations, he would nail the deceitful interpreter to the cross, and leave his body to the vultures. The Barbarian condescended, by producing an accurate list, to expose the bold falsehood of Vigilius, who had affirmed that no more than seventeen deserters could be found. But he arrogantly declared, that he apprehended only the disgrace of contending with his fugitive slaves; since he despised their impotent efforts to defend the provinces which Theodosius had intrusted to their arms: "For what fortress," (added Attila,) "what city, in the wide extent of the Roman empire, can hope to exist, secure and impregnable, if it is our pleasure that it should be erased from the earth?" He dismissed, however, the interpreter, who returned to Constantinople with his peremptory demand of more complete restitution, and a more splendid embassy. His anger gradually subsided, and his domestic satisfaction in a marriage which he celebrated on the road with the daughter of Eslam, might perhaps contribute to mollify the native fierceness of his temper. The entrance of Attila into the royal village was marked by a very singular ceremony. A numerous troop of women came out to meet their hero and their king. They marched before him, distributed into long and regular files; the intervals between the files were filled by white veils of thin linen, which the women on either side bore aloft in their hands, and which formed a canopy for a chorus of young virgins, who chanted hymns and songs in the Scythian language. The wife of his favorite Onegesius, with a train of female attendants, saluted Attila at the door of her own house, on his way to the palace; and offered, according to the custom of the country, her respectful homage, by entreating him to taste the wine and meat which she had prepared for his reception. As soon as the monarch had graciously accepted her hospitable gift, his domestics lifted a small silver table to a convenient height, as he sat on horseback; and Attila, when he had touched the goblet with his lips, again saluted the wife of Onegesius, and continued his march. During his residence at the seat of empire, his hours were not wasted in the recluse idleness of a seraglio; and the king of the Huns could maintain his superior dignity, without concealing his person from the public view. He frequently assembled his council, and gave audience to the ambassadors of the nations; and his people might appeal to the supreme tribunal, which he held at stated times, and, according to the Eastern custom, before the principal gate of his wooden palace. The Romans, both of the East and of the West, were twice invited to the banquets, where Attila feasted with the princes and nobles of Scythia. Maximin and his colleagues were stopped on the threshold, till they had made a devout libation to the health and prosperity of the king of the Huns; and were conducted, after this ceremony, to their respective seats in a spacious hall. The royal table and couch, covered with carpets and fine linen, was raised by several steps in the midst of the hall; and a son, an uncle, or perhaps a favorite king, were admitted to share the simple and homely repast of Attila. Two lines of small tables, each of which contained three or four guests, were ranged in order on either hand; the right was esteemed the most honorable, but the Romans ingenuously confess, that they were placed on the left; and that Beric, an unknown chieftain, most probably of the Gothic race, preceded the representatives of Theodosius and Valentinian. The Barbarian monarch received from his cup-bearer a goblet filled with wine, and courteously drank to the health of the most distinguished guest; who rose from his seat, and expressed, in the same manner, his loyal and respectful vows. This ceremony was successively performed for all, or at least for the illustrious persons of the assembly; and a considerable time must have been consumed, since it was thrice repeated as each course or service was placed on the table. But the wine still remained after the meat had been removed; and the Huns continued to indulge their intemperance long after the sober and decent ambassadors of the two empires had withdrawn themselves from the nocturnal banquet. Yet before they retired, they enjoyed a singular opportunity of observing the manners of the nation in their convivial amusements. Two Scythians stood before the couch of Attila, and recited the verses which they had composed, to celebrate his valor and his victories. A profound silence prevailed in the hall; and the attention of the guests was captivated by the vocal harmony, which revived and perpetuated the memory of their own exploits; a martial ardor flashed from the eyes of the warriors, who were impatient for battle; and the tears of the old men expressed their generous despair, that they could no longer partake the danger and glory of the field. This entertainment, which might be considered as a school of military virtue, was succeeded by a farce, that debased the dignity of human nature. A Moorish and a Scythian buffoon successively excited the mirth of the rude spectators, by their deformed figure, ridiculous dress, antic gestures, absurd speeches, and the strange, unintelligible confusion of the Latin, the Gothic, and the Hunnic languages; and the hall resounded with loud and licentious peals of laughter. In the midst of this intemperate riot, Attila alone, without a change of countenance, maintained his steadfast and inflexible gravity; which was never relaxed, except on the entrance of Irnac, the youngest of his sons: he embraced the boy with a smile of paternal tenderness, gently pinched him by the cheek, and betrayed a partial affection, which was justified by the assurance of his prophets, that Irnac would be the future support of his family and empire. Two days afterwards, the ambassadors received a second invitation; and they had reason to praise the politeness, as well as the hospitality, of Attila. The king of the Huns held a long and familiar conversation with Maximin; but his civility was interrupted by rude expressions and haughty reproaches; and he was provoked, by a motive of interest, to support, with unbecoming zeal, the private claims of his secretary Constantius. "The emperor" (said Attila) "has long promised him a rich wife: Constantius must not be disappointed; nor should a Roman emperor deserve the name of liar." On the third day, the ambassadors were dismissed; the freedom of several captives was granted, for a moderate ransom, to their pressing entreaties; and, besides the royal presents, they were permitted to accept from each of the Scythian nobles the honorable and useful gift of a horse. Maximin returned, by the same road, to Constantinople; and though he was involved in an accidental dispute with Beric, the new ambassador of Attila, he flattered himself that he had contributed, by the laborious journey, to confirm the peace and alliance of the two nations.
When Attila first met with the Roman ambassadors by the Danube, his tent was surrounded by a formidable guard. He sat in a wooden chair, and his stern face, angry gestures, and impatient tone shocked Maximin's composure. Vigilius had more reason to be nervous since he clearly understood Attila’s threat: if he did not respect the laws of nations, he would have the deceitful interpreter nailed to a cross and left for the vultures. Attila casually pointed out Vigilius's bold lie by presenting a detailed list, refuting his claim that only seventeen deserters existed. He arrogantly claimed he was only ashamed to deal with his runaway slaves, looking down on their feeble attempts to defend the provinces that Theodosius had entrusted to them: "For what fortress," Attila added, "what city in the vast Roman Empire can hope to remain secure and unassailable if we decide it should be wiped off the map?" However, he sent the interpreter back to Constantinople with his firm demand for more comprehensive restitution and a more impressive delegation. His anger gradually faded, and his happiness over marrying the daughter of Eslam during his journey may have softened his usually fierce temperament. Attila’s entrance into the royal village was marked by a unique ceremony. A large group of women came out to greet their hero and king. They marched ahead of him in long, organized lines; the spaces between these lines were filled with thin linen veils that the women held high, forming a canopy for a chorus of young virgins singing hymns and songs in Scythian. The wife of his favorite, Onegesius, along with her female attendants, greeted Attila at the door of her house as he passed on his way to the palace. She offered him her respectful hospitality by inviting him to enjoy the wine and meat she had prepared. Once the monarch graciously accepted her generous gift, his attendants lifted a small silver table to the right height while he sat on horseback. After taking a sip from the goblet, Attila again greeted Onegesius's wife and continued on his way. During his time at the imperial seat, he did not waste hours in idle leisure; the king of the Huns maintained his dignity without hiding from public view. He often gathered his council and met with ambassadors from various nations. His people could appeal to the supreme court he held at regular intervals by the main gate of his wooden palace. The Romans, from both East and West, were twice invited to banquets where Attila dined with the princes and nobles of Scythia. Maximin and his companions were halted at the entrance until they made a sacred libation for the health and prosperity of the king of the Huns, after which they were shown to their seats in a large hall. The royal table, raised several steps in the center of the hall and covered with carpets and fine linen, was shared by Attila with a son, an uncle, or perhaps a favored king, while two lines of small tables, each seating three or four guests, were arranged on either side. The right side was considered the most honored, but the Romans honestly admitted they were seated on the left, behind Beric, an unknown chieftain likely of Gothic descent, who sat ahead of the representatives of Theodosius and Valentinian. The Barbarian king received a goblet of wine from his cup-bearer and courteously drank to the health of the most distinguished guest. The guest then rose and reciprocated with his own loyal and respectful toast. This exchange was repeated for all, at least for the notable individuals in attendance, and it must have taken considerable time since it happened three times with each course served. However, wine remained after the food was cleared, and the Huns indulged long after the sober and dignified ambassadors of both empires had withdrawn from the late-night feast. Still, before they left, they had an unusual opportunity to observe the customs of the people during their drinking celebrations. Two Scythians performed before Attila’s couch, reciting verses they composed to honor his courage and victories. A deep silence hung in the hall as guests were captivated by the vocal harmony that revived the memory of their past exploits. Warriors' eyes sparkled with martial eagerness, while older men shed tears over their inability to participate in the dangers and glories of the battlefield. This entertainment, which could be seen as a lesson in military virtue, was followed by a performance that lowered the dignity of humanity. A Moorish and a Scythian jester entertained the boisterous audience with their grotesque appearances, ridiculous outfits, silly antics, absurd dialogues, and the chaotic mix of Latin, Gothic, and Hunnic languages. The hall erupted with loud and raunchy laughter. Amid this wild ruckus, Attila maintained his serious and steadfast demeanor without showing any change in expression except when his youngest son, Irnac, entered. He embraced the boy with a fond smile, gently pinched his cheek, and displayed a special affection, believing the prophets' assurances that Irnac would eventually support his family and empire. Two days later, the ambassadors received another invitation, and they had every reason to commend Attila's politeness and hospitality. The king of the Huns had a long and friendly chat with Maximin, but his courtesy was interrupted by rude comments and haughty accusations. He was driven by self-interest to vigorously advocate for his secretary Constantius's private claims. "The emperor," Attila remarked, "has long promised him a wealthy wife; Constantius cannot be disappointed, nor should a Roman emperor earn the title of liar." On the third day, the ambassadors were sent off, and several captives were granted their freedom for a moderate ransom to their urgent pleas. Along with the royal gifts, they were allowed to accept an honorable and useful gift of a horse from each Scythian noble. Maximin returned to Constantinople by the same route, and despite being involved in an accidental argument with Beric, Attila's new ambassador, he felt confident that he had helped solidify the peace and alliance between the two nations.
Chapter XXXIV: Attila.—Part III.
But the Roman ambassador was ignorant of the treacherous design, which had been concealed under the mask of the public faith. The surprise and satisfaction of Edecon, when he contemplated the splendor of Constantinople, had encouraged the interpreter Vigilius to procure for him a secret interview with the eunuch Chrysaphius, who governed the emperor and the empire. After some previous conversation, and a mutual oath of secrecy, the eunuch, who had not, from his own feelings or experience, imbibed any exalted notions of ministerial virtue, ventured to propose the death of Attila, as an important service, by which Edecon might deserve a liberal share of the wealth and luxury which he admired. The ambassador of the Huns listened to the tempting offer; and professed, with apparent zeal, his ability, as well as readiness, to execute the bloody deed; the design was communicated to the master of the offices, and the devout Theodosius consented to the assassination of his invincible enemy. But this perfidious conspiracy was defeated by the dissimulation, or the repentance, of Edecon; and though he might exaggerate his inward abhorrence for the treason, which he seemed to approve, he dexterously assumed the merit of an early and voluntary confession. If we now review the embassy of Maximin, and the behavior of Attila, we must applaud the Barbarian, who respected the laws of hospitality, and generously entertained and dismissed the minister of a prince who had conspired against his life. But the rashness of Vigilius will appear still more extraordinary, since he returned, conscious of his guilt and danger, to the royal camp, accompanied by his son, and carrying with him a weighty purse of gold, which the favorite eunuch had furnished, to satisfy the demands of Edecon, and to corrupt the fidelity of the guards. The interpreter was instantly seized, and dragged before the tribunal of Attila, where he asserted his innocence with specious firmness, till the threat of inflicting instant death on his son extorted from him a sincere discovery of the criminal transaction. Under the name of ransom, or confiscation, the rapacious king of the Huns accepted two hundred pounds of gold for the life of a traitor, whom he disdained to punish. He pointed his just indignation against a nobler object. His ambassadors, Eslaw and Orestes, were immediately despatched to Constantinople, with a peremptory instruction, which it was much safer for them to execute than to disobey. They boldly entered the Imperial presence, with the fatal purse hanging down from the neck of Orestes; who interrogated the eunuch Chrysaphius, as he stood beside the throne, whether he recognized the evidence of his guilt. But the office of reproof was reserved for the superior dignity of his colleague Eslaw, who gravely addressed the emperor of the East in the following words: "Theodosius is the son of an illustrious and respectable parent: Attila likewise is descended from a noble race; and he has supported, by his actions, the dignity which he inherited from his father Mundzuk. But Theodosius has forfeited his paternal honors, and, by consenting to pay tribute has degraded himself to the condition of a slave. It is therefore just, that he should reverence the man whom fortune and merit have placed above him; instead of attempting, like a wicked slave, clandestinely to conspire against his master." The son of Arcadius, who was accustomed only to the voice of flattery, heard with astonishment the severe language of truth: he blushed and trembled; nor did he presume directly to refuse the head of Chrysaphius, which Eslaw and Orestes were instructed to demand. A solemn embassy, armed with full powers and magnificent gifts, was hastily sent to deprecate the wrath of Attila; and his pride was gratified by the choice of Nomius and Anatolius, two ministers of consular or patrician rank, of whom the one was great treasurer, and the other was master-general of the armies of the East. He condescended to meet these ambassadors on the banks of the River Drenco; and though he at first affected a stern and haughty demeanor, his anger was insensibly mollified by their eloquence and liberality. He condescended to pardon the emperor, the eunuch, and the interpreter; bound himself by an oath to observe the conditions of peace; released a great number of captives; abandoned the fugitives and deserters to their fate; and resigned a large territory, to the south of the Danube, which he had already exhausted of its wealth and inhabitants. But this treaty was purchased at an expense which might have supported a vigorous and successful war; and the subjects of Theodosius were compelled to redeem the safety of a worthless favorite by oppressive taxes, which they would more cheerfully have paid for his destruction.
But the Roman ambassador didn't know about the treacherous plan hidden behind a facade of public trust. Edecon was surprised and pleased when he saw the splendor of Constantinople, which encouraged the interpreter Vigilius to arrange a secret meeting with the eunuch Chrysaphius, who held power over the emperor and the empire. After some initial conversation and a mutual promise of secrecy, the eunuch, who didn't have any high ideals about ministerial virtue from his own experiences, proposed the assassination of Attila as a way for Edecon to earn a generous share of the wealth and luxury he admired. The Hunnic ambassador listened to the tempting offer and expressed both enthusiasm and readiness to carry out the bloody act; the plan was communicated to the chief of staff, and the devout Theodosius agreed to the assassination of his formidable enemy. However, this deceitful plot was thwarted by Edecon’s deception or change of heart; although he may have exaggerated his strong dislike for the treachery he pretended to support, he skillfully took credit for an early and voluntary confession. If we look back at Maximin's embassy and Attila's behavior, we must commend the Barbarian for respecting the laws of hospitality and generously entertaining and dismissing the minister of a prince who had plotted against his life. But Vigilius's recklessness is even more shocking since he returned knowingly guilty and in danger to the royal camp, accompanied by his son and carrying a substantial bag of gold provided by the favorite eunuch to meet Edecon's demands and bribe the guards. The interpreter was quickly seized and brought before Attila's tribunal, where he claimed his innocence with convincing confidence until the threat of instant death to his son forced him to reveal the entire criminal scheme. Under the pretext of ransom or confiscation, the greedy king of the Huns accepted two hundred pounds of gold for the life of a traitor he scorned to punish. He directed his just anger toward a loftier target. His ambassadors, Eslaw and Orestes, were promptly sent to Constantinople with a mandatory instruction that was far safer to follow than to ignore. They boldly entered the emperor's presence, with the damning purse hanging from Orestes's neck, who asked the eunuch Chrysaphius, standing beside the throne, if he recognized the evidence of his guilt. But the task of reprimanding was left to Eslaw, who solemnly addressed the Eastern emperor with these words: "Theodosius is the son of a distinguished and respectable parent: Attila also comes from a noble lineage; and he has proved his worth through his actions, upholding the dignity he inherited from his father Mundzuk. However, Theodosius has forfeited his paternal honors, and by agreeing to pay tribute, he has degraded himself to the status of a slave. It is, therefore, fair that he should respect the man whom fortune and merit have placed above him, instead of trying, like a dishonorable slave, to secretly conspire against his master." The son of Arcadius, who was used only to flattery, listened in astonishment to the harsh truth: he blushed and trembled; nor did he dare to outright refuse the head of Chrysaphius, which Eslaw and Orestes were instructed to demand. A formal embassy, armed with full authority and grand gifts, was quickly sent to appease Attila's wrath; and his pride was satisfied by the selection of Nomius and Anatolius, two ministers of consular or patrician rank. One was the chief treasurer, and the other was the commander-in-chief of the Eastern armies. He agreed to meet these ambassadors on the banks of the River Drenco; and although he initially adopted a stern and arrogant demeanor, his anger was gradually softened by their eloquence and generosity. He agreed to pardon the emperor, the eunuch, and the interpreter; bound himself by an oath to uphold the conditions of peace; released a large number of captives; abandoned the fleeing and deserters to their fate; and gave up a vast territory south of the Danube, which he had already depleted of its wealth and people. However, this treaty came at a cost that could have funded a vigorous and successful war; and Theodosius's subjects were forced to pay oppressive taxes to secure the safety of an unworthy favorite, taxes they would have preferred to pay for his demise.
The emperor Theodosius did not long survive the most humiliating circumstance of an inglorious life. As he was riding, or hunting, in the neighborhood of Constantinople, he was thrown from his horse into the River Lycus: the spine of the back was injured by the fall; and he expired some days afterwards, in the fiftieth year of his age, and the forty-third of his reign. His sister Pulcheria, whose authority had been controlled both in civil and ecclesiastical affairs by the pernicious influence of the eunuchs, was unanimously proclaimed Empress of the East; and the Romans, for the first time, submitted to a female reign. No sooner had Pulcheria ascended the throne, than she indulged her own and the public resentment, by an act of popular justice. Without any legal trial, the eunuch Chrysaphius was executed before the gates of the city; and the immense riches which had been accumulated by the rapacious favorite, served only to hasten and to justify his punishment. Amidst the general acclamations of the clergy and people, the empress did not forget the prejudice and disadvantage to which her sex was exposed; and she wisely resolved to prevent their murmurs by the choice of a colleague, who would always respect the superior rank and virgin chastity of his wife. She gave her hand to Marcian, a senator, about sixty years of age; and the nominal husband of Pulcheria was solemnly invested with the Imperial purple. The zeal which he displayed for the orthodox creed, as it was established by the council of Chalcedon, would alone have inspired the grateful eloquence of the Catholics. But the behavior of Marcian in a private life, and afterwards on the throne, may support a more rational belief, that he was qualified to restore and invigorate an empire, which had been almost dissolved by the successive weakness of two hereditary monarchs. He was born in Thrace, and educated to the profession of arms; but Marcian's youth had been severely exercised by poverty and misfortune, since his only resource, when he first arrived at Constantinople, consisted in two hundred pieces of gold, which he had borrowed of a friend. He passed nineteen years in the domestic and military service of Aspar, and his son Ardaburius; followed those powerful generals to the Persian and African wars; and obtained, by their influence, the honorable rank of tribune and senator. His mild disposition, and useful talents, without alarming the jealousy, recommended Marcian to the esteem and favor of his patrons; he had seen, perhaps he had felt, the abuses of a venal and oppressive administration; and his own example gave weight and energy to the laws, which he promulgated for the reformation of manners.
The emperor Theodosius didn't live long after the most humiliating event of his unremarkable life. While riding or hunting near Constantinople, he was thrown from his horse into the River Lycus. He injured his spine in the fall and died a few days later at the age of fifty, after ruling for forty-three years. His sister Pulcheria, whose authority had been undermined by the harmful influence of the eunuchs in both civil and church matters, was unanimously declared Empress of the East. For the first time, the Romans accepted a female ruler. As soon as Pulcheria took the throne, she acted on her own and the public's anger by enacting an act of popular justice. Without a legal trial, the eunuch Chrysaphius was executed outside the city gates, and the vast wealth he had amassed only expedited and justified his punishment. Amid the cheers of the clergy and the people, the empress didn't forget the bias and challenges her gender faced; she wisely decided to silence any complaints by choosing a colleague who would respect her higher status and virginity. She married Marcian, a senator around sixty years old, and he was officially given the title of emperor. His enthusiasm for the orthodox faith established by the council of Chalcedon would have inspired gratitude among Catholics. However, Marcian's personal conduct, both in private life and on the throne, suggests he was capable of restoring and strengthening an empire that had nearly collapsed due to the ongoing weakness of two hereditary rulers. Born in Thrace and trained for military service, Marcian's youth was marked by poverty and hardship; upon arriving in Constantinople, he had only two hundred gold coins borrowed from a friend. He spent nineteen years in the service of Aspar and his son Ardaburius, following these powerful generals in the Persian and African wars, and through their influence, achieved the respectable positions of tribune and senator. His gentle nature and useful skills, without provoking jealousy, earned him the respect and support of his mentors; he had witnessed, and perhaps experienced, the issues of a corrupt and oppressive administration, and his own example lent strength and determination to the reforms he introduced.
Chapter XXXV: Invasion By Attila.—Part I.
Invasion Of Gaul By Attila.—He Is Repulsed By Ætius And The Visigoths.—Attila Invades And Evacuates Italy.—The Deaths Of Attila, Ætius, And Valentinian The Third.
Invasion of Gaul by Attila.—He is pushed back by Ætius and the Visigoths.—Attila invades and then retreats from Italy.—The deaths of Attila, Ætius, and Valentinian the Third.
It was the opinion of Marcian, that war should be avoided, as long as it is possible to preserve a secure and honorable peace; but it was likewise his opinion, that peace cannot be honorable or secure, if the sovereign betrays a pusillanimous aversion to war. This temperate courage dictated his reply to the demands of Attila, who insolently pressed the payment of the annual tribute. The emperor signified to the Barbarians, that they must no longer insult the majesty of Rome by the mention of a tribute; that he was disposed to reward, with becoming liberality, the faithful friendship of his allies; but that, if they presumed to violate the public peace, they should feel that he possessed troops, and arms, and resolution, to repel their attacks. The same language, even in the camp of the Huns, was used by his ambassador Apollonius, whose bold refusal to deliver the presents, till he had been admitted to a personal interview, displayed a sense of dignity, and a contempt of danger, which Attila was not prepared to expect from the degenerate Romans. He threatened to chastise the rash successor of Theodosius; but he hesitated whether he should first direct his invincible arms against the Eastern or the Western empire. While mankind awaited his decision with awful suspense, he sent an equal defiance to the courts of Ravenna and Constantinople; and his ministers saluted the two emperors with the same haughty declaration. "Attila, my lord, and thy lord, commands thee to provide a palace for his immediate reception." But as the Barbarian despised, or affected to despise, the Romans of the East, whom he had so often vanquished, he soon declared his resolution of suspending the easy conquest, till he had achieved a more glorious and important enterprise. In the memorable invasions of Gaul and Italy, the Huns were naturally attracted by the wealth and fertility of those provinces; but the particular motives and provocations of Attila can only be explained by the state of the Western empire under the reign of Valentinian, or, to speak more correctly, under the administration of Ætius.
Marcian believed that war should be avoided as long as it was possible to maintain a secure and honorable peace. However, he also thought that peace couldn’t be honorable or secure if the ruler had a cowardly aversion to war. This measured courage influenced his response to Attila, who arrogantly insisted on the payment of the annual tribute. The emperor made it clear to the Barbarians that they should no longer insult the dignity of Rome by mentioning tribute; he was willing to generously reward the loyal friendship of his allies, but if they dared to break the public peace, they would realize that he had troops, weapons, and the determination to fend off their attacks. The same message was relayed by his ambassador Apollonius to the Huns, who boldly refused to deliver the gifts until he was granted a personal meeting. This displayed a sense of dignity and a disregard for danger that Attila was not expecting from the weakened Romans. He threatened to punish the reckless successor of Theodosius, but he hesitated on whether to unleash his unstoppable forces against the Eastern or Western empire first. As everyone waited anxiously for his decision, he sent an equal challenge to the courts of Ravenna and Constantinople, with his ministers greeting the two emperors with the same arrogant message: “Attila, my lord, and thy lord, commands you to prepare a palace for his immediate arrival.” But since the Barbarian looked down upon, or pretended to look down upon, the Romans of the East, whom he had conquered many times, he soon declared his intention to postpone this easy conquest until he could achieve a more glorious and significant undertaking. In the notable invasions of Gaul and Italy, the Huns were naturally drawn by the wealth and fertility of those regions; however, the specific motives and provocations of Attila can only be understood in the context of the state of the Western empire during Valentinian's reign, or, more accurately, under the administration of Ætius.
After the death of his rival Boniface, Ætius had prudently retired to the tents of the Huns; and he was indebted to their alliance for his safety and his restoration. Instead of the suppliant language of a guilty exile, he solicited his pardon at the head of sixty thousand Barbarians; and the empress Placidia confessed, by a feeble resistance, that the condescension, which might have been ascribed to clemency, was the effect of weakness or fear. She delivered herself, her son Valentinian, and the Western empire, into the hands of an insolent subject; nor could Placidia protect the son-in-law of Boniface, the virtuous and faithful Sebastian, from the implacable persecution which urged him from one kingdom to another, till he miserably perished in the service of the Vandals. The fortunate Ætius, who was immediately promoted to the rank of patrician, and thrice invested with the honors of the consulship, assumed, with the title of master of the cavalry and infantry, the whole military power of the state; and he is sometimes styled, by contemporary writers, the duke, or general, of the Romans of the West. His prudence, rather than his virtue, engaged him to leave the grandson of Theodosius in the possession of the purple; and Valentinian was permitted to enjoy the peace and luxury of Italy, while the patrician appeared in the glorious light of a hero and a patriot, who supported near twenty years the ruins of the Western empire. The Gothic historian ingenuously confesses, that Ætius was born for the salvation of the Roman republic; and the following portrait, though it is drawn in the fairest colors, must be allowed to contain a much larger proportion of truth than of flattery. "His mother was a wealthy and noble Italian, and his father Gaudentius, who held a distinguished rank in the province of Scythia, gradually rose from the station of a military domestic, to the dignity of master of the cavalry. Their son, who was enrolled almost in his infancy in the guards, was given as a hostage, first to Alaric, and afterwards to the Huns; and he successively obtained the civil and military honors of the palace, for which he was equally qualified by superior merit. The graceful figure of Ætius was not above the middle stature; but his manly limbs were admirably formed for strength, beauty, and agility; and he excelled in the martial exercises of managing a horse, drawing the bow, and darting the javelin. He could patiently endure the want of food, or of sleep; and his mind and body were alike capable of the most laborious efforts. He possessed the genuine courage that can despise not only dangers, but injuries: and it was impossible either to corrupt, or deceive, or intimidate the firm integrity of his soul." The Barbarians, who had seated themselves in the Western provinces, were insensibly taught to respect the faith and valor of the patrician Ætius. He soothed their passions, consulted their prejudices, balanced their interests, and checked their ambition. A seasonable treaty, which he concluded with Genseric, protected Italy from the depredations of the Vandals; the independent Britons implored and acknowledged his salutary aid; the Imperial authority was restored and maintained in Gaul and Spain; and he compelled the Franks and the Suevi, whom he had vanquished in the field, to become the useful confederates of the republic.
After Boniface, his rival, died, Ætius wisely took refuge with the Huns, relying on their alliance for his safety and return to power. Rather than begging for forgiveness like a guilty exile, he sought it at the head of sixty thousand Barbarians. Empress Placidia showed through her weak resistance that what could have seemed like mercy was actually just a sign of weakness or fear. She handed herself, her son Valentinian, and the Western empire over to an arrogant subject. Placidia couldn't protect Boniface's son-in-law, the virtuous and loyal Sebastian, from the relentless persecution that pushed him from one kingdom to another until he tragically died serving the Vandals. The fortunate Ætius quickly rose to the rank of patrician and was given the honors of consul three times. With the title of master of cavalry and infantry, he took command of the entire military power of the state, and contemporary writers sometimes referred to him as the duke or general of the Western Romans. His wisdom, more than his virtue, led him to leave the grandson of Theodosius in power; Valentinian enjoyed peace and luxury in Italy while the patrician was celebrated as a hero and patriot who upheld the crumbling Western empire for nearly twenty years. A Gothic historian openly stated that Ætius was destined to save the Roman republic, and while the praise might be flattering, the following description contains more truth than exaggeration. "His mother was a wealthy and noble Italian, and his father Gaudentius, who held a prominent position in Scythia, gradually rose from being a military servant to becoming master of the cavalry. Their son, who joined the guards almost as a child, was offered as a hostage first to Alaric and then to the Huns. He earned both civil and military honors in the palace due to his exceptional talent. Ætius had a well-proportioned body; he was of average height, but his strong limbs were perfectly built for strength, beauty, and agility. He excelled at riding, archery, and throwing the javelin. He could endure hunger and lack of sleep, and his mind and body were both capable of the most demanding efforts. He possessed true courage that could dismiss not only dangers but also insults: it was impossible to corrupt, deceive, or intimidate the unwavering integrity of his character." The Barbarians settled in the Western provinces gradually learned to respect Ætius’s loyalty and bravery. He calmed their tempers, considered their biases, balanced their interests, and restrained their ambitions. A timely treaty he made with Genseric protected Italy from the Vandals' raids; the independent Britons sought and acknowledged his beneficial support; imperial authority was restored and maintained in Gaul and Spain; and he forced the Franks and Suevi, whom he had defeated in battle, to become valuable allies of the republic.
From a principle of interest, as well as gratitude, Ætius assiduously cultivated the alliance of the Huns. While he resided in their tents as a hostage, or an exile, he had familiarly conversed with Attila himself, the nephew of his benefactor; and the two famous antagonists appeared to have been connected by a personal and military friendship, which they afterwards confirmed by mutual gifts, frequent embassies, and the education of Carpilio, the son of Ætius, in the camp of Attila. By the specious professions of gratitude and voluntary attachment, the patrician might disguise his apprehensions of the Scythian conqueror, who pressed the two empires with his innumerable armies. His demands were obeyed or eluded. When he claimed the spoils of a vanquished city, some vases of gold, which had been fraudulently embezzled, the civil and military governors of Noricum were immediately despatched to satisfy his complaints: and it is evident, from their conversation with Maximin and Priscus, in the royal village, that the valor and prudence of Ætius had not saved the Western Romans from the common ignominy of tribute. Yet his dexterous policy prolonged the advantages of a salutary peace; and a numerous army of Huns and Alani, whom he had attached to his person, was employed in the defence of Gaul. Two colonies of these Barbarians were judiciously fixed in the territories of Valens and Orleans; and their active cavalry secured the important passages of the Rhone and of the Loire. These savage allies were not indeed less formidable to the subjects than to the enemies of Rome. Their original settlement was enforced with the licentious violence of conquest; and the province through which they marched was exposed to all the calamities of a hostile invasion. Strangers to the emperor or the republic, the Alani of Gaul was devoted to the ambition of Ætius, and though he might suspect, that, in a contest with Attila himself, they would revolt to the standard of their national king, the patrician labored to restrain, rather than to excite, their zeal and resentment against the Goths, the Burgundians, and the Franks.
From a sense of self-interest and gratitude, Ætius diligently maintained his alliance with the Huns. While he lived in their camps as a hostage or an exile, he had casual conversations with Attila, the nephew of his benefactor. The two well-known rivals seemed to share a personal and military friendship, which they later strengthened through mutual gifts, frequent missions, and the training of Ætius's son, Carpilio, in Attila's camp. With the insincere displays of gratitude and loyalty, the patrician was able to mask his fears of the Scythian conqueror, who threatened both empires with his vast armies. His demands were either met or avoided. When he requested the treasures from a conquered city, including some gold vases that had been stolen, the civil and military leaders of Noricum were promptly sent to address his grievances. It was clear from their discussions with Maximin and Priscus in the royal village that Ætius's bravery and wisdom had not spared the Western Romans from the general shame of paying tribute. Nonetheless, his clever strategies extended the benefits of a much-needed peace, and a large army of Huns and Alani, whom he had gathered around him, was used in the defense of Gaul. Two groups of these Barbarians were wisely settled in the regions of Valens and Orleans, and their active cavalry protected key routes along the Rhone and the Loire. These savage allies were no less intimidating to the subjects of Rome than to its enemies. Their original settlement was established through the brutal force of conquest, and the area they traversed was subjected to the full range of the horrors of a hostile invasion. Unconnected to the emperor or the republic, the Alani of Gaul were dedicated to Ætius's ambitions, and although he may have suspected that in a conflict with Attila they would switch sides to support their own king, the patrician worked to dampen rather than stoke their anger and resentment towards the Goths, Burgundians, and Franks.
The kingdom established by the Visigoths in the southern provinces of Gaul, had gradually acquired strength and maturity; and the conduct of those ambitious Barbarians, either in peace or war, engaged the perpetual vigilance of Ætius. After the death of Wallia, the Gothic sceptre devolved to Theodoric, the son of the great Alaric; and his prosperous reign of more than thirty years, over a turbulent people, may be allowed to prove, that his prudence was supported by uncommon vigor, both of mind and body. Impatient of his narrow limits, Theodoric aspired to the possession of Arles, the wealthy seat of government and commerce; but the city was saved by the timely approach of Ætius; and the Gothic king, who had raised the siege with some loss and disgrace, was persuaded, for an adequate subsidy, to divert the martial valor of his subjects in a Spanish war. Yet Theodoric still watched, and eagerly seized, the favorable moment of renewing his hostile attempts. The Goths besieged Narbonne, while the Belgic provinces were invaded by the Burgundians; and the public safety was threatened on every side by the apparent union of the enemies of Rome. On every side, the activity of Ætius, and his Scythian cavalry, opposed a firm and successful resistance. Twenty thousand Burgundians were slain in battle; and the remains of the nation humbly accepted a dependent seat in the mountains of Savoy. The walls of Narbonne had been shaken by the battering engines, and the inhabitants had endured the last extremities of famine, when Count Litorius, approaching in silence, and directing each horseman to carry behind him two sacks of flour, cut his way through the intrenchments of the besiegers. The siege was immediately raised; and the more decisive victory, which is ascribed to the personal conduct of Ætius himself, was marked with the blood of eight thousand Goths. But in the absence of the patrician, who was hastily summoned to Italy by some public or private interest, Count Litorius succeeded to the command; and his presumption soon discovered that far different talents are required to lead a wing of cavalry, or to direct the operations of an important war. At the head of an army of Huns, he rashly advanced to the gates of Thoulouse, full of careless contempt for an enemy whom his misfortunes had rendered prudent, and his situation made desperate. The predictions of the augurs had inspired Litorius with the profane confidence that he should enter the Gothic capital in triumph; and the trust which he reposed in his Pagan allies, encouraged him to reject the fair conditions of peace, which were repeatedly proposed by the bishops in the name of Theodoric. The king of the Goths exhibited in his distress the edifying contrast of Christian piety and moderation; nor did he lay aside his sackcloth and ashes till he was prepared to arm for the combat. His soldiers, animated with martial and religious enthusiasm, assaulted the camp of Litorius. The conflict was obstinate; the slaughter was mutual. The Roman general, after a total defeat, which could be imputed only to his unskilful rashness, was actually led through the streets of Thoulouse, not in his own, but in a hostile triumph; and the misery which he experienced, in a long and ignominious captivity, excited the compassion of the Barbarians themselves. Such a loss, in a country whose spirit and finances were long since exhausted, could not easily be repaired; and the Goths, assuming, in their turn, the sentiments of ambition and revenge, would have planted their victorious standards on the banks of the Rhone, if the presence of Ætius had not restored strength and discipline to the Romans. The two armies expected the signal of a decisive action; but the generals, who were conscious of each other's force, and doubtful of their own superiority, prudently sheathed their swords in the field of battle; and their reconciliation was permanent and sincere. Theodoric, king of the Visigoths, appears to have deserved the love of his subjects, the confidence of his allies, and the esteem of mankind. His throne was surrounded by six valiant sons, who were educated with equal care in the exercises of the Barbarian camp, and in those of the Gallic schools: from the study of the Roman jurisprudence, they acquired the theory, at least, of law and justice; and the harmonious sense of Virgil contributed to soften the asperity of their native manners. The two daughters of the Gothic king were given in marriage to the eldest sons of the kings of the Suevi and of the Vandals, who reigned in Spain and Africa: but these illustrious alliances were pregnant with guilt and discord. The queen of the Suevi bewailed the death of a husband inhumanly massacred by her brother. The princess of the Vandals was the victim of a jealous tyrant, whom she called her father. The cruel Genseric suspected that his son's wife had conspired to poison him; the supposed crime was punished by the amputation of her nose and ears; and the unhappy daughter of Theodoric was ignominiously returned to the court of Thoulouse in that deformed and mutilated condition. This horrid act, which must seem incredible to a civilized age drew tears from every spectator; but Theodoric was urged, by the feelings of a parent and a king, to revenge such irreparable injuries. The Imperial ministers, who always cherished the discord of the Barbarians, would have supplied the Goths with arms, and ships, and treasures, for the African war; and the cruelty of Genseric might have been fatal to himself, if the artful Vandal had not armed, in his cause, the formidable power of the Huns. His rich gifts and pressing solicitations inflamed the ambition of Attila; and the designs of Ætius and Theodoric were prevented by the invasion of Gaul.
The kingdom established by the Visigoths in the southern provinces of Gaul gradually grew stronger and more mature; the ambitious behavior of those Barbarians, whether in peace or war, constantly demanded the attention of Ætius. After Wallia died, the Gothic crown passed to Theodoric, the son of the great Alaric; and his successful reign of over thirty years, among a turbulent people, shows that his wisdom was backed by exceptional energy, both mentally and physically. Unhappy with his limited territory, Theodoric aimed to take Arles, a rich center of government and trade; but the city was saved by the timely arrival of Ætius, and the Gothic king, who raised the siege after suffering some losses and humiliation, was persuaded, for a fair payment, to direct the fighting spirit of his people into a war in Spain. Still, Theodoric kept a watchful eye and eagerly seized the right moment to renew his hostile attempts. The Goths laid siege to Narbonne while the Burgundians invaded the Belgic provinces, posing a serious threat to public safety from the clear alliance of Rome's enemies. On every front, Ætius’s efforts and his Scythian cavalry effectively resisted the threats. Twenty thousand Burgundians fell in battle, and what remained of their nation reluctantly accepted a subordinate position in the mountains of Savoy. The walls of Narbonne were battered by siege engines, and the inhabitants faced the direst hunger, when Count Litorius, approaching quietly and instructing each cavalryman to carry two sacks of flour behind him, broke through the besiegers' defenses. The siege was lifted immediately, and the more decisive victory, credited to the personal leadership of Ætius himself, resulted in the bloodshed of eight thousand Goths. However, in the patrician's absence—who was rushed to Italy for some public or private matter—Count Litorius took command; and his overconfidence quickly revealed that leading cavalry was not the same as directing the complexities of significant warfare. Leading an army of Huns, he foolishly marched to the gates of Toulouse, dismissing an enemy made cautious by past failures and desperate by their circumstances. Encouraged by the augurs’ predictions, Litorius naïvely believed he would enter the Gothic capital in triumph and, trusting his Pagan allies, refused the fair peace terms repeatedly offered by bishops on behalf of Theodoric. In his misery, Theodoric displayed the admirable contrast of Christian faith and moderation; he did not abandon his sackcloth and ashes until he was ready to fight. His soldiers, fired up with both martial and religious zeal, attacked Litorius’s camp. The battle was fierce, and casualties were high on both sides. The Roman general, having suffered a complete defeat, was led through the streets of Toulouse not in his own victory parade but in a humiliating defeat; the misery he endured during a long and shameful captivity even stirred the Barbarians’ sympathy. Such a significant loss, in a land whose spirit and finances had long been drained, could not be easily recovered; and the Goths, adopting feelings of ambition and revenge, would have planted their victorious banners on the banks of the Rhone if Ætius hadn’t restored strength and discipline to the Romans. The two armies awaited the signal for a decisive battle; however, the generals, aware of each other's strength and uncertain of their own advantage, wisely sheathed their swords in the battlefield, and their reconciliation was genuine and lasting. Theodoric, king of the Visigoths, seemed to earn the love of his subjects, the trust of his allies, and the respect of mankind. His throne was surrounded by six brave sons, who received equal training in both the ways of the Barbarian camp and in the Gallic schools: through studying Roman law, they at least grasped the theory of law and justice; and the beautiful verses of Virgil helped soften their rough nature. The two daughters of the Gothic king were married off to the eldest sons of the kings of the Suevi and the Vandals, who ruled in Spain and Africa, but these noble alliances led to guilt and discord. The queen of the Suevi mourned a husband brutally murdered by her brother. The daughter of the Vandals suffered under a jealous tyrant she called father. The cruel Genseric suspected that his son’s wife plotted to poison him; the alleged crime was punished by cutting off her nose and ears, and the unfortunate daughter of Theodoric was sent back to the court of Toulouse in that disfigured and mutilated state. This horrifying act, which seems unbelievable today, brought tears to every witness; yet Theodoric felt compelled, as both a parent and a king, to avenge such irreversible wrongs. The Imperial officials, who always encouraged strife among the Barbarians, would have supplied the Goths with weapons, ships, and riches for the African campaign; and Genseric’s cruelty might have backfired on him if the cunning Vandal hadn’t rallied the formidable power of the Huns to his side. His generous gifts and urgent appeals fired up Attila’s ambition, preventing the plans of Ætius and Theodoric with the invasion of Gaul.
The Franks, whose monarchy was still confined to the neighborhood of the Lower Rhine, had wisely established the right of hereditary succession in the noble family of the Merovingians. These princes were elevated on a buckler, the symbol of military command; and the royal fashion of long hair was the ensign of their birth and dignity. Their flaxen locks, which they combed and dressed with singular care, hung down in flowing ringlets on their back and shoulders; while the rest of the nation were obliged, either by law or custom, to shave the hinder part of their head, to comb their hair over the forehead, and to content themselves with the ornament of two small whiskers. The lofty stature of the Franks, and their blue eyes, denoted a Germanic origin; their close apparel accurately expressed the figure of their limbs; a weighty sword was suspended from a broad belt; their bodies were protected by a large shield; and these warlike Barbarians were trained, from their earliest youth, to run, to leap, to swim; to dart the javelin, or battle-axe, with unerring aim; to advance, without hesitation, against a superior enemy; and to maintain, either in life or death, the invincible reputation of their ancestors. Clodion, the first of their long-haired kings, whose name and actions are mentioned in authentic history, held his residence at Dispargum, a village or fortress, whose place may be assigned between Louvain and Brussels. From the report of his spies, the king of the Franks was informed, that the defenceless state of the second Belgic must yield, on the slightest attack, to the valor of his subjects. He boldly penetrated through the thickets and morasses of the Carbonarian forest; occupied Tournay and Cambray, the only cities which existed in the fifth century, and extended his conquests as far as the River Somme, over a desolate country, whose cultivation and populousness are the effects of more recent industry. While Clodion lay encamped in the plains of Artois, and celebrated, with vain and ostentatious security, the marriage, perhaps, of his son, the nuptial feast was interrupted by the unexpected and unwelcome presence of Ætius, who had passed the Somme at the head of his light cavalry. The tables, which had been spread under the shelter of a hill, along the banks of a pleasant stream, were rudely overturned; the Franks were oppressed before they could recover their arms, or their ranks; and their unavailing valor was fatal only to themselves. The loaded wagons, which had followed their march, afforded a rich booty; and the virgin-bride, with her female attendants, submitted to the new lovers, who were imposed on them by the chance of war. This advance, which had been obtained by the skill and activity of Ætius, might reflect some disgrace on the military prudence of Clodion; but the king of the Franks soon regained his strength and reputation, and still maintained the possession of his Gallic kingdom from the Rhine to the Somme. Under his reign, and most probably from the enterprising spirit of his subjects, his three capitals, Mentz, Treves, and Cologne, experienced the effects of hostile cruelty and avarice. The distress of Cologne was prolonged by the perpetual dominion of the same Barbarians, who evacuated the ruins of Treves; and Treves, which in the space of forty years had been four times besieged and pillaged, was disposed to lose the memory of her afflictions in the vain amusements of the Circus. The death of Clodion, after a reign of twenty years, exposed his kingdom to the discord and ambition of his two sons. Meroveus, the younger, was persuaded to implore the protection of Rome; he was received at the Imperial court, as the ally of Valentinian, and the adopted son of the patrician Ætius; and dismissed to his native country, with splendid gifts, and the strongest assurances of friendship and support. During his absence, his elder brother had solicited, with equal ardor, the formidable aid of Attila; and the king of the Huns embraced an alliance, which facilitated the passage of the Rhine, and justified, by a specious and honorable pretence, the invasion of Gaul.
The Franks, whose monarchy was still limited to the area around the Lower Rhine, had wisely established hereditary succession within the noble Merovingian family. These princes were raised on a shield, symbolizing military command; and their long hair was a sign of their royal birth and nobility. Their light-colored hair, which they combed and styled with great care, flowed in ringlets down their backs and shoulders, while the rest of the population was required, either by law or custom, to shave the back of their heads, comb their hair over their foreheads, and settle for just two small whiskers as an accessory. The tall stature of the Franks and their blue eyes indicated a Germanic heritage; their fitted clothing highlighted the shape of their bodies; a heavy sword hung from a wide belt; they were protected by large shields; and these warlike Barbarians were trained from a young age to run, leap, swim, throw javelins or battle-axes with pinpoint accuracy, charge confidently against a stronger enemy, and uphold the invincible reputation of their ancestors, whether in life or death. Clodion, the first of their long-haired kings mentioned in authentic history, lived in Dispargum, a village or fortress located between Louvain and Brussels. According to reports from his spies, the king of the Franks learned that the unprotected state of the second Belgic would easily yield to his people's bravery with just the slightest attack. He boldly pushed through the dense thickets and swamps of the Carbonarian forest, captured Tournay and Cambray, the only cities that existed in the fifth century, and extended his conquests all the way to the River Somme, over a deserted land that only gained its productivity and population through later efforts. While Clodion was camped in the plains of Artois, perhaps celebrating the marriage of his son with unmerited confidence, his wedding feast was unexpectedly interrupted by Ætius, who had crossed the Somme leading his light cavalry. The tables set up on a hillside beside a lovely stream were violently overturned; the Franks were overwhelmed before they could recover their weapons or organize themselves; and their brave efforts only led to their own doom. The heavily loaded wagons that had followed them offered a rich prize; and the virgin bride, along with her female attendants, was taken by the new suitors forced upon them by the chance of battle. This advance, achieved through Ætius's skill and agility, might have brought some shame to Clodion’s military strategy; however, the king of the Franks quickly regained his strength and reputation and continued to hold his Gaulish kingdom from the Rhine to the Somme. Under his rule, and likely due to the ambitious nature of his subjects, his three capitals—Mentz, Treves, and Cologne—suffered from the cruelty and greed of invaders. The distress in Cologne was prolonged by the continuous dominance of these same Barbarians, who abandoned the ruins of Treves; and Treves, which had been besieged and plundered four times within forty years, was ready to forget its sufferings in the frivolous distractions of the Circus. The death of Clodion, after a twenty-year reign, left his kingdom vulnerable to the strife and ambitions of his two sons. Meroveus, the younger, was persuaded to seek protection from Rome; he was welcomed at the Imperial court as an ally of Valentinian and the adopted son of the patrician Ætius, and sent back home with lavish gifts and strong promises of friendship and support. While he was away, his older brother sought, with equal enthusiasm, the formidable help of Attila; and the king of the Huns accepted an alliance that allowed him to cross the Rhine and provided a convenient and honorable pretext for invading Gaul.
Chapter XXXV: Invasion By Attila.—Part II.
When Attila declared his resolution of supporting the cause of his allies, the Vandals and the Franks, at the same time, and almost in the spirit of romantic chivalry, the savage monarch professed himself the lover and the champion of the princess Honoria. The sister of Valentinian was educated in the palace of Ravenna; and as her marriage might be productive of some danger to the state, she was raised, by the title of Augusta, above the hopes of the most presumptuous subject. But the fair Honoria had no sooner attained the sixteenth year of her age, than she detested the importunate greatness which must forever exclude her from the comforts of honorable love; in the midst of vain and unsatisfactory pomp, Honoria sighed, yielded to the impulse of nature, and threw herself into the arms of her chamberlain Eugenius. Her guilt and shame (such is the absurd language of imperious man) were soon betrayed by the appearances of pregnancy; but the disgrace of the royal family was published to the world by the imprudence of the empress Placidia who dismissed her daughter, after a strict and shameful confinement, to a remote exile at Constantinople. The unhappy princess passed twelve or fourteen years in the irksome society of the sisters of Theodosius, and their chosen virgins; to whose crown Honoria could no longer aspire, and whose monastic assiduity of prayer, fasting, and vigils, she reluctantly imitated. Her impatience of long and hopeless celibacy urged her to embrace a strange and desperate resolution. The name of Attila was familiar and formidable at Constantinople; and his frequent embassies entertained a perpetual intercourse between his camp and the Imperial palace. In the pursuit of love, or rather of revenge, the daughter of Placidia sacrificed every duty and every prejudice; and offered to deliver her person into the arms of a Barbarian, of whose language she was ignorant, whose figure was scarcely human, and whose religion and manners she abhorred. By the ministry of a faithful eunuch, she transmitted to Attila a ring, the pledge of her affection; and earnestly conjured him to claim her as a lawful spouse, to whom he had been secretly betrothed. These indecent advances were received, however, with coldness and disdain; and the king of the Huns continued to multiply the number of his wives, till his love was awakened by the more forcible passions of ambition and avarice. The invasion of Gaul was preceded, and justified, by a formal demand of the princess Honoria, with a just and equal share of the Imperial patrimony. His predecessors, the ancient Tanjous, had often addressed, in the same hostile and peremptory manner, the daughters of China; and the pretensions of Attila were not less offensive to the majesty of Rome. A firm, but temperate, refusal was communicated to his ambassadors. The right of female succession, though it might derive a specious argument from the recent examples of Placidia and Pulcheria, was strenuously denied; and the indissoluble engagements of Honoria were opposed to the claims of her Scythian lover. On the discovery of her connection with the king of the Huns, the guilty princess had been sent away, as an object of horror, from Constantinople to Italy: her life was spared; but the ceremony of her marriage was performed with some obscure and nominal husband, before she was immured in a perpetual prison, to bewail those crimes and misfortunes, which Honoria might have escaped, had she not been born the daughter of an emperor.
When Attila declared his intention to support his allies, the Vandals and the Franks, he almost embodied the spirit of romantic chivalry as he proclaimed himself the lover and champion of Princess Honoria. The sister of Valentinian was raised in the palace of Ravenna, and since her marriage could pose a danger to the state, she was elevated to the title of Augusta, placing her above the ambitions of even the most arrogant subjects. However, once Honoria turned sixteen, she hated the relentless power that excluded her from the joys of honorable love. Amidst the empty and unfulfilling luxury, Honoria sighed, succumbed to her feelings, and fell into the arms of her chamberlain Eugenius. Her guilt and shame — as absurd as it is to say in a patriarchal society — quickly became evident with the signs of her pregnancy. The disgrace of the royal family was made public due to the foolishness of Empress Placidia, who sent her daughter away into a distant exile in Constantinople after a strict and shameful confinement. The unfortunate princess spent twelve or fourteen years in the tedious company of the sisters of Theodosius and their chosen virgins; she could no longer aspire to their crown and reluctantly imitated their monastic practices of prayer, fasting, and vigils. Her impatience with long and hopeless celibacy pushed her to make a strange and desperate choice. The name of Attila was well-known and fearsome in Constantinople, and his frequent diplomatic missions ensured ongoing contact between his camp and the Imperial palace. In her quest for love, or rather revenge, Placidia's daughter sacrificed every duty and prejudice, offering herself to a Barbarian whose language she did not understand, whose appearance was hardly human, and whose religion and customs she detested. Through a loyal eunuch, she sent Attila a ring as a token of her affection and earnestly urged him to claim her as a lawful wife, to whom he had been secretly promised. However, these inappropriate approaches were met with indifference and contempt; the king of the Huns continued to take more wives until his love was sparked by stronger feelings of ambition and greed. The invasion of Gaul was prefaced and justified by a formal request for Princess Honoria, along with a fair share of the Imperial inheritance. His predecessors, the ancient Tanjous, had often addressed the daughters of China in the same hostile and demanding way, and Attila's claims were equally offensive to the dignity of Rome. A firm yet measured refusal was conveyed to his ambassadors. The right of female succession, while it could have been argued based on the recent instances of Placidia and Pulcheria, was strongly denied, and Honoria's unbreakable commitments were opposed to the desires of her Scythian lover. When her connection with the king of the Huns was discovered, the guilty princess was sent away, a source of shame, from Constantinople to Italy. Her life was spared; however, she was married off to some obscure and nominal husband before being confined to a life in a perpetual prison, mourning the crimes and misfortunes that Honoria might have avoided if she had not been born the daughter of an emperor.
A native of Gaul, and a contemporary, the learned and eloquent Sidonius, who was afterwards bishop of Clermont, had made a promise to one of his friends, that he would compose a regular history of the war of Attila. If the modesty of Sidonius had not discouraged him from the prosecution of this interesting work, the historian would have related, with the simplicity of truth, those memorable events, to which the poet, in vague and doubtful metaphors, has concisely alluded. The kings and nations of Germany and Scythia, from the Volga perhaps to the Danube, obeyed the warlike summons of Attila. From the royal village, in the plains of Hungary his standard moved towards the West; and after a march of seven or eight hundred miles, he reached the conflux of the Rhine and the Neckar, where he was joined by the Franks, who adhered to his ally, the elder of the sons of Clodion. A troop of light Barbarians, who roamed in quest of plunder, might choose the winter for the convenience of passing the river on the ice; but the innumerable cavalry of the Huns required such plenty of forage and provisions, as could be procured only in a milder season; the Hercynian forest supplied materials for a bridge of boats; and the hostile myriads were poured, with resistless violence, into the Belgic provinces. The consternation of Gaul was universal; and the various fortunes of its cities have been adorned by tradition with martyrdoms and miracles. Troyes was saved by the merits of St. Lupus; St. Servatius was removed from the world, that he might not behold the ruin of Tongres; and the prayers of St. Genevieve diverted the march of Attila from the neighborhood of Paris. But as the greatest part of the Gallic cities were alike destitute of saints and soldiers, they were besieged and stormed by the Huns; who practised, in the example of Metz, their customary maxims of war. They involved, in a promiscuous massacre, the priests who served at the altar, and the infants, who, in the hour of danger, had been providently baptized by the bishop; the flourishing city was delivered to the flames, and a solitary chapel of St. Stephen marked the place where it formerly stood. From the Rhine and the Moselle, Attila advanced into the heart of Gaul; crossed the Seine at Auxerre; and, after a long and laborious march, fixed his camp under the walls of Orleans. He was desirous of securing his conquests by the possession of an advantageous post, which commanded the passage of the Loire; and he depended on the secret invitation of Sangiban, king of the Alani, who had promised to betray the city, and to revolt from the service of the empire. But this treacherous conspiracy was detected and disappointed: Orleans had been strengthened with recent fortifications; and the assaults of the Huns were vigorously repelled by the faithful valor of the soldiers, or citizens, who defended the place. The pastoral diligence of Anianus, a bishop of primitive sanctity and consummate prudence, exhausted every art of religious policy to support their courage, till the arrival of the expected succors. After an obstinate siege, the walls were shaken by the battering rams; the Huns had already occupied the suburbs; and the people, who were incapable of bearing arms, lay prostrate in prayer. Anianus, who anxiously counted the days and hours, despatched a trusty messenger to observe, from the rampart, the face of the distant country. He returned twice, without any intelligence that could inspire hope or comfort; but, in his third report, he mentioned a small cloud, which he had faintly descried at the extremity of the horizon. "It is the aid of God!" exclaimed the bishop, in a tone of pious confidence; and the whole multitude repeated after him, "It is the aid of God." The remote object, on which every eye was fixed, became each moment larger, and more distinct; the Roman and Gothic banners were gradually perceived; and a favorable wind blowing aside the dust, discovered, in deep array, the impatient squadrons of Ætius and Theodoric, who pressed forwards to the relief of Orleans.
A native of Gaul and a contemporary figure, the knowledgeable and articulate Sidonius, who later became the bishop of Clermont, had promised a friend that he would write a comprehensive history of the war with Attila. If Sidonius's modesty hadn’t held him back from pursuing this captivating work, he would have shared, with heartfelt honesty, the significant events that the poet only hinted at through vague and uncertain metaphors. The kings and peoples of Germany and Scythia, stretching possibly from the Volga to the Danube, answered Attila's call to arms. From his royal village in the plains of Hungary, his banner moved westward; after a journey of seven or eight hundred miles, he arrived at the confluence of the Rhine and the Neckar, where he was joined by the Franks, loyal to their ally, Clodion's elder son. A band of light Barbarians, seeking plunder, might choose winter for the ease of crossing the river on ice; however, the vast cavalry of the Huns needed a lot of forage and provisions, which could only be found in a milder season. The Hercynian forest provided materials for a boat bridge, and the overwhelming forces surged violently into the Belgian provinces. Panic spread throughout Gaul, and the varied fates of its cities have been embellished by tradition with tales of martyrdoms and miracles. Troyes was saved thanks to St. Lupus; St. Servatius left this world so he wouldn't witness Tongres's destruction; and St. Genevieve's prayers diverted Attila away from Paris. But since most Gallic cities lacked both saints and soldiers, they fell under siege and attack from the Huns, who executed their usual tactics as seen in Metz. They massacred everyone indiscriminately, including the priests at the altar and the infants who had been baptized by the bishop during the crisis; the once-prosperous city was set ablaze, and the sole chapel of St. Stephen marked the spot where it once stood. Attila advanced from the Rhine and Moselle into the heart of Gaul, crossed the Seine at Auxerre, and after a lengthy and challenging trek, set up camp outside Orleans. He wanted to secure his gains by taking a strategic position that controlled the Loire passage, relying on the secret agreement of Sangiban, king of the Alani, who promised to betray the city and turn against the empire. However, this treacherous plot was uncovered and thwarted: Orleans had been fortified with new defenses; and the Huns faced fierce resistance from the brave soldiers and citizens defending the city. The diligent bishop Anianus, known for his ancient sanctity and wisdom, used every tactic of religious encouragement to bolster their spirits until the arrival of the expected reinforcements. After a stubborn siege, the battering rams shook the walls; the Huns had already taken the outskirts, while those unable to fight lay flat in prayer. Anianus, who anxiously watched the days and hours, sent a trusted messenger to look out from the rampart at the distant land. The messenger returned twice, without any news to inspire hope or comfort; but on his third report, he mentioned a small cloud he had faintly spotted on the edge of the horizon. "It is the help of God!" exclaimed the bishop with deep faith; and the entire crowd echoed, "It is the help of God." The distant object that everyone gazed at grew larger and clearer by the moment; they gradually recognized the Roman and Gothic banners, and as a favorable wind blew away the dust, they revealed, arrayed in formation, the eager troops of Ætius and Theodoric, who came rushing to aid Orleans.
The facility with which Attila had penetrated into the heart of Gaul, may be ascribed to his insidious policy, as well as to the terror of his arms. His public declarations were skilfully mitigated by his private assurances; he alternately soothed and threatened the Romans and the Goths; and the courts of Ravenna and Thoulouse, mutually suspicious of each other's intentions, beheld, with supine indifference, the approach of their common enemy. Ætius was the sole guardian of the public safety; but his wisest measures were embarrassed by a faction, which, since the death of Placidia, infested the Imperial palace: the youth of Italy trembled at the sound of the trumpet; and the Barbarians, who, from fear or affection, were inclined to the cause of Attila, awaited with doubtful and venal faith, the event of the war. The patrician passed the Alps at the head of some troops, whose strength and numbers scarcely deserved the name of an army. But on his arrival at Arles, or Lyons, he was confounded by the intelligence, that the Visigoths, refusing to embrace the defence of Gaul, had determined to expect, within their own territories, the formidable invader, whom they professed to despise. The senator Avitus, who, after the honorable exercise of the Prætorian præfecture, had retired to his estate in Auvergne, was persuaded to accept the important embassy, which he executed with ability and success. He represented to Theodoric, that an ambitious conqueror, who aspired to the dominion of the earth, could be resisted only by the firm and unanimous alliance of the powers whom he labored to oppress. The lively eloquence of Avitus inflamed the Gothic warriors, by the description of the injuries which their ancestors had suffered from the Huns; whose implacable fury still pursued them from the Danube to the foot of the Pyrenees. He strenuously urged, that it was the duty of every Christian to save, from sacrilegious violation, the churches of God, and the relics of the saints: that it was the interest of every Barbarian, who had acquired a settlement in Gaul, to defend the fields and vineyards, which were cultivated for his use, against the desolation of the Scythian shepherds. Theodoric yielded to the evidence of truth; adopted the measure at once the most prudent and the most honorable; and declared, that, as the faithful ally of Ætius and the Romans, he was ready to expose his life and kingdom for the common safety of Gaul. The Visigoths, who, at that time, were in the mature vigor of their fame and power, obeyed with alacrity the signal of war; prepared their arms and horses, and assembled under the standard of their aged king, who was resolved, with his two eldest sons, Torismond and Theodoric, to command in person his numerous and valiant people. The example of the Goths determined several tribes or nations, that seemed to fluctuate between the Huns and the Romans. The indefatigable diligence of the patrician gradually collected the troops of Gaul and Germany, who had formerly acknowledged themselves the subjects, or soldiers, of the republic, but who now claimed the rewards of voluntary service, and the rank of independent allies; the Læti, the Armoricans, the Breones the Saxons, the Burgundians, the Sarmatians, or Alani, the Ripuarians, and the Franks who followed Meroveus as their lawful prince. Such was the various army, which, under the conduct of Ætius and Theodoric, advanced, by rapid marches to relieve Orleans, and to give battle to the innumerable host of Attila.
The way Attila effortlessly invaded the heart of Gaul can be attributed to both his cunning strategy and the fear his military instilled. His public statements were cleverly softened by his private reassurances; he alternately comforted and threatened both the Romans and the Goths. Meanwhile, the courts of Ravenna and Toulouse, suspicious of each other’s motives, viewed the approach of their common enemy with casual indifference. Ætius was the only protector of public safety; yet his best efforts were undermined by a faction that had plagued the Imperial palace since Placidia’s death. The youth of Italy shook at the sound of the trumpet, while the Barbarians, swayed by fear or loyalty, were uncertain and corruptly loyal to Attila as they awaited the war's outcome. The patrician crossed the Alps leading a few troops, whose size and strength barely qualified as an army. But upon reaching Arles or Lyons, he was shocked to learn that the Visigoths had chosen not to defend Gaul and instead planned to face the dreaded invader within their own lands, despite claiming to scorn him. Senator Avitus, who had retired to his estate in Auvergne after honorably serving as Prætorian prefect, was convinced to take on the important mission, which he carried out effectively and successfully. He informed Theodoric that an ambitious conqueror, eager to dominate the world, could only be resisted through a strong and united alliance of the powers he sought to subjugate. Avitus’s passionate speeches roused the Gothic warriors by recounting the wrongs their ancestors had endured at the hands of the Huns, whose relentless wrath still chased them from the Danube to the Pyrenees. He emphasized the responsibility of every Christian to protect the churches of God and the remains of the saints from sacrilegious violation, and that it was in the interest of every Barbarian who had settled in Gaul to defend the fields and vineyards that sustained him from the devastation brought by the Scythian shepherds. Theodoric acknowledged the truth in these words; he embraced the most sensible and honorable course of action and declared that, as a loyal ally of Ætius and the Romans, he was prepared to risk his life and kingdom for the shared safety of Gaul. The Visigoths, at the peak of their fame and power, eagerly responded to the call for war; they readied their arms and horses and gathered under the banner of their elderly king, who was determined to personally lead his many brave troops alongside his two eldest sons, Torismond and Theodoric. The Goths’ example inspired several tribes and nations that were wavering between the Huns and the Romans. The tireless efforts of the patrician gradually brought together troops from Gaul and Germany, who had previously acknowledged their status as subjects or soldiers of the republic, but were now claiming the benefits of voluntary service and the status of independent allies; the Læti, the Armoricans, the Breones, the Saxons, the Burgundians, the Sarmatians, or Alani, the Ripuarians, and the Franks who followed Meroveus as their rightful leader. This diverse army, led by Ætius and Theodoric, marched swiftly to relieve Orleans and to confront the countless forces of Attila.
On their approach the king of the Huns immediately raised the siege, and sounded a retreat to recall the foremost of his troops from the pillage of a city which they had already entered. The valor of Attila was always guided by his prudence; and as he foresaw the fatal consequences of a defeat in the heart of Gaul, he repassed the Seine, and expected the enemy in the plains of Châlons, whose smooth and level surface was adapted to the operations of his Scythian cavalry. But in this tumultuary retreat, the vanguard of the Romans and their allies continually pressed, and sometimes engaged, the troops whom Attila had posted in the rear; the hostile columns, in the darkness of the night and the perplexity of the roads, might encounter each other without design; and the bloody conflict of the Franks and Gepidæ, in which fifteen thousand Barbarians were slain, was a prelude to a more general and decisive action. The Catalaunian fields spread themselves round Châlons, and extend, according to the vague measurement of Jornandes, to the length of one hundred and fifty, and the breadth of one hundred miles, over the whole province, which is entitled to the appellation of a champaign country. This spacious plain was distinguished, however, by some inequalities of ground; and the importance of a height, which commanded the camp of Attila, was understood and disputed by the two generals. The young and valiant Torismond first occupied the summit; the Goths rushed with irresistible weight on the Huns, who labored to ascend from the opposite side: and the possession of this advantageous post inspired both the troops and their leaders with a fair assurance of victory. The anxiety of Attila prompted him to consult his priests and haruspices. It was reported, that, after scrutinizing the entrails of victims, and scraping their bones, they revealed, in mysterious language, his own defeat, with the death of his principal adversary; and that the Barbarians, by accepting the equivalent, expressed his involuntary esteem for the superior merit of Ætius. But the unusual despondency, which seemed to prevail among the Huns, engaged Attila to use the expedient, so familiar to the generals of antiquity, of animating his troops by a military oration; and his language was that of a king, who had often fought and conquered at their head. He pressed them to consider their past glory, their actual danger, and their future hopes. The same fortune, which opened the deserts and morasses of Scythia to their unarmed valor, which had laid so many warlike nations prostrate at their feet, had reserved the joys of this memorable field for the consummation of their victories. The cautious steps of their enemies, their strict alliance, and their advantageous posts, he artfully represented as the effects, not of prudence, but of fear. The Visigoths alone were the strength and nerves of the opposite army; and the Huns might securely trample on the degenerate Romans, whose close and compact order betrayed their apprehensions, and who were equally incapable of supporting the dangers or the fatigues of a day of battle. The doctrine of predestination, so favorable to martial virtue, was carefully inculcated by the king of the Huns; who assured his subjects, that the warriors, protected by Heaven, were safe and invulnerable amidst the darts of the enemy; but that the unerring Fates would strike their victims in the bosom of inglorious peace. "I myself," continued Attila, "will throw the first javelin, and the wretch who refuses to imitate the example of his sovereign, is devoted to inevitable death." The spirit of the Barbarians was rekindled by the presence, the voice, and the example of their intrepid leader; and Attila, yielding to their impatience, immediately formed his order of battle. At the head of his brave and faithful Huns, he occupied in person the centre of the line. The nations subject to his empire, the Rugians, the Heruli, the Thuringians, the Franks, the Burgundians, were extended on either hand, over the ample space of the Catalaunian fields; the right wing was commanded by Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ; and the three valiant brothers, who reigned over the Ostrogoths, were posted on the left to oppose the kindred tribes of the Visigoths. The disposition of the allies was regulated by a different principle. Sangiban, the faithless king of the Alani, was placed in the centre, where his motions might be strictly watched, and that the treachery might be instantly punished. Ætius assumed the command of the left, and Theodoric of the right wing; while Torismond still continued to occupy the heights which appear to have stretched on the flank, and perhaps the rear, of the Scythian army. The nations from the Volga to the Atlantic were assembled on the plain of Châlons; but many of these nations had been divided by faction, or conquest, or emigration; and the appearance of similar arms and ensigns, which threatened each other, presented the image of a civil war.
As they approached, the king of the Huns quickly lifted the siege and ordered a retreat to call back the front line of his troops from looting a city they had already entered. Attila's bravery was always guided by his wisdom; he recognized the disastrous consequences of a defeat in the heart of Gaul, so he crossed back over the Seine and prepared to meet the enemy on the plains of Châlons, where the smooth, flat terrain favored his Scythian cavalry. However, during this chaotic retreat, the Roman vanguard and their allies kept pressing forward, occasionally clashing with the troops Attila had stationed at the rear. In the confusion of night and the complicated roads, opposing columns might run into each other unexpectedly. The bloody battle between the Franks and Gepidæ, which claimed the lives of fifteen thousand Barbarians, foreshadowed a more significant and decisive confrontation. The Catalaunian fields surrounded Châlons and spanned roughly one hundred and fifty miles in length and one hundred miles in width, across the entire province known as a champaign country. This vast plain, however, featured some uneven terrain, with the crucial height that overlooked Attila's camp being claimed and contested by both generals. The young and brave Torismond was the first to take the high ground; the Goths charged with overwhelming force against the Huns, who struggled to ascend from the opposite side. Securing this advantageous position inspired confidence in both the soldiers and their leaders regarding victory. Attila's anxiety drove him to consult his priests and fortune-tellers, who reported that after examining the entrails of victims and scraping their bones, they predicted his own defeat along with the death of his main opponent. It was said that the Barbarians, by accepting this ominous news, unwittingly acknowledged Ætius's superior worth. Yet, seeing the unusual gloom that hung over the Huns, Attila resorted to the familiar tactic of ancient generals: he rallied his troops with a motivating speech. His words were those of a king who had frequently led them to battle and victory. He urged them to reflect on their past glories, their current perils, and their future hopes. The same fortune that had allowed their unarmed bravery to conquer the wilds of Scythia and had brought many warring nations to their knees had reserved the joys of this remarkable battlefield for the completion of their victories. He cleverly portrayed the careful movements of their enemies, their strong alliances, and their favorable positions as signs not of careful planning but of fear. The Visigoths alone were the backbone of the opposing army, and the Huns could confidently trample the weakened Romans, whose tightly formed ranks betrayed their fears and made them incapable of enduring the dangers or fatigue of a day of battle. Attila emphasized the doctrine of predestination, which was highly favorable to martial courage, assuring his followers that those warriors blessed by Heaven were safe and invulnerable amidst the enemy's arrows while the unerring Fates would strike their targets in the midst of a shameful peace. "I myself," Attila declared, "will throw the first javelin, and anyone who doesn't follow the example of their king is doomed to certain death." The presence, voice, and example of their fearless leader reignited the spirit of the Barbarians, and Attila, responding to their eagerness, immediately arranged his battle line. Leading his brave and loyal Huns, he took a position at the center of the formation. The nations under his control—the Rugians, the Heruli, the Thuringians, the Franks, and the Burgundians—spread out on either side across the vast Catalaunian fields. Ardaric, the king of the Gepidæ, commanded the right wing, while the three brave brothers ruling over the Ostrogoths stood on the left to face their cousin tribes, the Visigoths. The allies were arranged differently: Sangiban, the treacherous king of the Alani, was placed in the center where his actions would be closely monitored, ready for any treachery to be swiftly punished. Ætius took command of the left, while Theodoric led the right wing, with Torismond still holding the heights that seemed to extend around the flank, possibly even the rear, of the Scythian army. Nations from the Volga to the Atlantic gathered on the plain of Châlons, but many of them were divided by factions, conquest, or migration; the appearance of similar arms and standards that threatened one another resembled the scenario of a civil war.
The discipline and tactics of the Greeks and Romans form an interesting part of their national manners. The attentive study of the military operations of Xenophon, or Cæsar, or Frederic, when they are described by the same genius which conceived and executed them, may tend to improve (if such improvement can be wished) the art of destroying the human species. But the battle of Châlons can only excite our curiosity by the magnitude of the object; since it was decided by the blind impetuosity of Barbarians, and has been related by partial writers, whose civil or ecclesiastical profession secluded them from the knowledge of military affairs. Cassiodorus, however, had familiarly conversed with many Gothic warriors, who served in that memorable engagement; "a conflict," as they informed him, "fierce, various, obstinate, and bloody; such as could not be paralleled either in the present or in past ages." The number of the slain amounted to one hundred and sixty-two thousand, or, according to another account, three hundred thousand persons; and these incredible exaggerations suppose a real and effective loss sufficient to justify the historian's remark, that whole generations may be swept away by the madness of kings, in the space of a single hour. After the mutual and repeated discharge of missile weapons, in which the archers of Scythia might signalize their superior dexterity, the cavalry and infantry of the two armies were furiously mingled in closer combat. The Huns, who fought under the eyes of their king pierced through the feeble and doubtful centre of the allies, separated their wings from each other, and wheeling, with a rapid effort, to the left, directed their whole force against the Visigoths. As Theodoric rode along the ranks, to animate his troops, he received a mortal stroke from the javelin of Andages, a noble Ostrogoth, and immediately fell from his horse. The wounded king was oppressed in the general disorder, and trampled under the feet of his own cavalry; and this important death served to explain the ambiguous prophecy of the haruspices. Attila already exulted in the confidence of victory, when the valiant Torismond descended from the hills, and verified the remainder of the prediction. The Visigoths, who had been thrown into confusion by the flight or defection of the Alani, gradually restored their order of battle; and the Huns were undoubtedly vanquished, since Attila was compelled to retreat. He had exposed his person with the rashness of a private soldier; but the intrepid troops of the centre had pushed forwards beyond the rest of the line; their attack was faintly supported; their flanks were unguarded; and the conquerors of Scythia and Germany were saved by the approach of the night from a total defeat. They retired within the circle of wagons that fortified their camp; and the dismounted squadrons prepared themselves for a defence, to which neither their arms, nor their temper, were adapted. The event was doubtful: but Attila had secured a last and honorable resource. The saddles and rich furniture of the cavalry were collected, by his order, into a funeral pile; and the magnanimous Barbarian had resolved, if his intrenchments should be forced, to rush headlong into the flames, and to deprive his enemies of the glory which they might have acquired, by the death or captivity of Attila.
The discipline and strategies of the Greeks and Romans offer an intriguing glimpse into their culture. A close examination of the military campaigns of Xenophon, Caesar, or Frederick, as portrayed by the same great minds that conceived and executed them, could potentially enhance (if such enhancement is desirable) the skill of destroying humanity. However, the Battle of Châlons mainly piques our interest due to its scale, as it was determined by the reckless fury of barbarians and has been described by biased authors whose civilian or church roles kept them away from military expertise. Cassiodorus, on the other hand, had spoken with many Gothic fighters who participated in that significant battle; "a clash," they told him, "intense, varied, stubborn, and bloody; unmatched either in our time or in history." Estimates of the dead varied, claiming one hundred sixty-two thousand, or, according to another source, three hundred thousand people; such outrageous figures suggest a real and significant death toll that justifies the historian’s note that whole generations can be wiped out by the whims of kings in just an hour. After repeated volleys of projectiles, where the Scythian archers showed their superior skill, the cavalry and infantry of both armies clashed fiercely in close combat. The Huns, fighting under their king’s watch, broke through the weak and uncertain center of the allies, divided their forces, and, quickly pivoting to the left, directed their entire strength against the Visigoths. As Theodoric rode through the ranks to rally his soldiers, he was fatally struck by a javelin from Andages, a noble Ostrogoth, and immediately fell from his horse. The injured king was overwhelmed in the general chaos and trampled by his own cavalry; this crucial death helped clarify the ambiguous prediction of the soothsayers. Attila was already reveling in his confidence of victory when the brave Torismond descended from the hills, fulfilling the remainder of the prophecy. The Visigoths, who had been thrown into disarray by the retreat or betrayal of the Alani, gradually reformed their battle lines; the Huns were surely defeated, as Attila had to retreat. He had placed himself at risk like an ordinary soldier; however, the brave troops at the center had pushed too far ahead of the rest of the line; their attack lacked proper backing, their flanks were unprotected, and the victors of Scythia and Germany were saved from complete defeat by the onset of night. They withdrew within the protected circle of wagons that surrounded their camp; and the dismounted troops prepared for a defense they were ill-equipped for, both in arms and spirit. The outcome was uncertain: but Attila had arranged a final honorable option. By his command, the saddles and lavish gear of the cavalry were gathered into a funeral pyre; and the noble Barbarian had determined that if his defenses were breached, he would charge into the flames, denying his enemies the glory they might have gained from either killing or capturing Attila.
But his enemies had passed the night in equal disorder and anxiety. The inconsiderate courage of Torismond was tempted to urge the pursuit, till he unexpectedly found himself, with a few followers, in the midst of the Scythian wagons. In the confusion of a nocturnal combat, he was thrown from his horse; and the Gothic prince must have perished like his father, if his youthful strength, and the intrepid zeal of his companions, had not rescued him from this dangerous situation. In the same manner, but on the left of the line, Ætius himself, separated from his allies, ignorant of their victory, and anxious for their fate, encountered and escaped the hostile troops that were scattered over the plains of Châlons; and at length reached the camp of the Goths, which he could only fortify with a slight rampart of shields, till the dawn of day. The Imperial general was soon satisfied of the defeat of Attila, who still remained inactive within his intrenchments; and when he contemplated the bloody scene, he observed, with secret satisfaction, that the loss had principally fallen on the Barbarians. The body of Theodoric, pierced with honorable wounds, was discovered under a heap of the slain: is subjects bewailed the death of their king and father; but their tears were mingled with songs and acclamations, and his funeral rites were performed in the face of a vanquished enemy. The Goths, clashing their arms, elevated on a buckler his eldest son Torismond, to whom they justly ascribed the glory of their success; and the new king accepted the obligation of revenge as a sacred portion of his paternal inheritance. Yet the Goths themselves were astonished by the fierce and undaunted aspect of their formidable antagonist; and their historian has compared Attila to a lion encompassed in his den, and threatening his hunters with redoubled fury. The kings and nations who might have deserted his standard in the hour of distress, were made sensible that the displeasure of their monarch was the most imminent and inevitable danger. All his instruments of martial music incessantly sounded a loud and animating strain of defiance; and the foremost troops who advanced to the assault were checked or destroyed by showers of arrows from every side of the intrenchments. It was determined, in a general council of war, to besiege the king of the Huns in his camp, to intercept his provisions, and to reduce him to the alternative of a disgraceful treaty or an unequal combat. But the impatience of the Barbarians soon disdained these cautious and dilatory measures; and the mature policy of Ætius was apprehensive that, after the extirpation of the Huns, the republic would be oppressed by the pride and power of the Gothic nation. The patrician exerted the superior ascendant of authority and reason to calm the passions, which the son of Theodoric considered as a duty; represented, with seeming affection and real truth, the dangers of absence and delay and persuaded Torismond to disappoint, by his speedy return, the ambitious designs of his brothers, who might occupy the throne and treasures of Thoulouse. After the departure of the Goths, and the separation of the allied army, Attila was surprised at the vast silence that reigned over the plains of Châlons: the suspicion of some hostile stratagem detained him several days within the circle of his wagons, and his retreat beyond the Rhine confessed the last victory which was achieved in the name of the Western empire. Meroveus and his Franks, observing a prudent distance, and magnifying the opinion of their strength by the numerous fires which they kindled every night, continued to follow the rear of the Huns till they reached the confines of Thuringia. The Thuringians served in the army of Attila: they traversed, both in their march and in their return, the territories of the Franks; and it was perhaps in this war that they exercised the cruelties which, about fourscore years afterwards, were revenged by the son of Clovis. They massacred their hostages, as well as their captives: two hundred young maidens were tortured with exquisite and unrelenting rage; their bodies were torn asunder by wild horses, or their bones were crushed under the weight of rolling wagons; and their unburied limbs were abandoned on the public roads, as a prey to dogs and vultures. Such were those savage ancestors, whose imaginary virtues have sometimes excited the praise and envy of civilized ages.
But his enemies had spent the night in equal chaos and worry. The reckless bravery of Torismond pushed him to continue the chase until he unexpectedly found himself, along with a few followers, surrounded by the Scythian wagons. In the confusion of a nighttime battle, he was thrown from his horse; and the Gothic prince would have met the same fate as his father if it hadn’t been for his youthful strength and the fearless determination of his companions, who saved him from this perilous situation. Similarly, on the left of the line, Ætius himself, separated from his allies, unaware of their victory, and anxious about their fate, faced and narrowly escaped the hostile troops scattered across the plains of Châlons; he eventually reached the Goths' camp, which he could only reinforce with a simple rampart of shields until dawn. The Imperial general quickly confirmed Attila's defeat, who remained inactive in his fortifications; and as he surveyed the bloody scene, he felt a secret satisfaction seeing that the losses were mainly suffered by the Barbarians. The body of Theodoric, marked by honorable wounds, was found among a pile of the dead: his subjects mourned the death of their king and father, but their tears were mixed with songs and cheers, and his funeral rites were conducted in front of a defeated enemy. The Goths, clashing their weapons, lifted his eldest son Torismond onto a shield, crediting him with the glory of their victory; and the new king accepted the duty of revenge as a sacred part of his inheritance. Yet the Goths were still astonished by the fierce and undaunted appearance of their formidable opponent; their historian has likened Attila to a lion surrounded in his den, threatening his hunters with renewed fury. The kings and nations who might have defected in a time of crisis realized that incurring the wrath of their ruler was the greatest and most unavoidable danger. All his military instruments continuously played a loud and inspiring tune of defiance; and the leading troops advancing for the assault were halted or annihilated by a barrage of arrows from all sides of the fortifications. In a general war council, it was decided to besiege the king of the Huns in his camp, cut off his supplies, and force him into a humiliating treaty or an uneven battle. However, the impatience of the Barbarians quickly dismissed these cautious and slow strategies; and Ætius’s seasoned strategy feared that, after the Huns were eliminated, the republic would be dominated by the pride and power of the Gothic nation. The patrician used the weight of authority and reason to calm the passions, which the son of Theodoric saw as his duty; he expressed, with seeming care and genuine truth, the risks of absence and delay, persuading Torismond to prevent, with his swift return, the ambitious plans of his brothers, who might seize the throne and treasures of Thoulouse. After the Goths left and the allied army was separated, Attila was surprised by the overwhelming silence that settled over the plains of Châlons: his suspicion of some hostile trick kept him within the confines of his wagons for several days, and his retreat beyond the Rhine acknowledged the last victory won in the name of the Western Empire. Meroveus and his Franks, maintaining a prudent distance and enhancing their perceived strength by the numerous fires they lit each night, continued to trail the rear of the Huns until they reached the borders of Thuringia. The Thuringians were part of Attila's army: they traversed both during their march and on their return through Frankish territory; and it was perhaps during this conflict that they committed the atrocities which, about eighty years later, were avenged by Clovis’s son. They massacred both their hostages and captives: two hundred young women were subjected to cruel and relentless torment; their bodies were ripped apart by wild horses, or their bones crushed under the weight of moving wagons; and their unburied remains were left along public roads, prey for dogs and vultures. Such were those savage ancestors, whose imagined virtues have sometimes earned the admiration and envy of civilized ages.
Chapter XXXV: Invasion By Attila.—Part III.
Neither the spirit, nor the forces, nor the reputation, of Attila, were impaired by the failure of the Gallic expedition. In the ensuing spring he repeated his demand of the princess Honoria, and her patrimonial treasures. The demand was again rejected, or eluded; and the indignant lover immediately took the field, passed the Alps, invaded Italy, and besieged Aquileia with an innumerable host of Barbarians. Those Barbarians were unskilled in the methods of conducting a regular siege, which, even among the ancients, required some knowledge, or at least some practice, of the mechanic arts. But the labor of many thousand provincials and captives, whose lives were sacrificed without pity, might execute the most painful and dangerous work. The skill of the Roman artists might be corrupted to the destruction of their country. The walls of Aquileia were assaulted by a formidable train of battering rams, movable turrets, and engines, that threw stones, darts, and fire; and the monarch of the Huns employed the forcible impulse of hope, fear, emulation, and interest, to subvert the only barrier which delayed the conquest of Italy. Aquileia was at that period one of the richest, the most populous, and the strongest of the maritime cities of the Adriatic coast. The Gothic auxiliaries, who appeared to have served under their native princes, Alaric and Antala, communicated their intrepid spirit; and the citizens still remembered the glorious and successful resistance which their ancestors had opposed to a fierce, inexorable Barbarian, who disgraced the majesty of the Roman purple. Three months were consumed without effect in the siege of the Aquileia; till the want of provisions, and the clamors of his army, compelled Attila to relinquish the enterprise; and reluctantly to issue his orders, that the troops should strike their tents the next morning, and begin their retreat. But as he rode round the walls, pensive, angry, and disappointed, he observed a stork preparing to leave her nest, in one of the towers, and to fly with her infant family towards the country. He seized, with the ready penetration of a statesman, this trifling incident, which chance had offered to superstition; and exclaimed, in a loud and cheerful tone, that such a domestic bird, so constantly attached to human society, would never have abandoned her ancient seats, unless those towers had been devoted to impending ruin and solitude. The favorable omen inspired an assurance of victory; the siege was renewed and prosecuted with fresh vigor; a large breach was made in the part of the wall from whence the stork had taken her flight; the Huns mounted to the assault with irresistible fury; and the succeeding generation could scarcely discover the ruins of Aquileia. After this dreadful chastisement, Attila pursued his march; and as he passed, the cities of Altinum, Concordia, and Padua, were reduced into heaps of stones and ashes. The inland towns, Vicenza, Verona, and Bergamo, were exposed to the rapacious cruelty of the Huns. Milan and Pavia submitted, without resistance, to the loss of their wealth; and applauded the unusual clemency which preserved from the flames the public, as well as private, buildings, and spared the lives of the captive multitude. The popular traditions of Comum, Turin, or Modena, may justly be suspected; yet they concur with more authentic evidence to prove, that Attila spread his ravages over the rich plains of modern Lombardy; which are divided by the Po, and bounded by the Alps and Apennine. When he took possession of the royal palace of Milan, he was surprised and offended at the sight of a picture which represented the Cæsars seated on their throne, and the princes of Scythia prostrate at their feet. The revenge which Attila inflicted on this monument of Roman vanity, was harmless and ingenious. He commanded a painter to reverse the figures and the attitudes; and the emperors were delineated on the same canvas, approaching in a suppliant posture to empty their bags of tributary gold before the throne of the Scythian monarch. The spectators must have confessed the truth and propriety of the alteration; and were perhaps tempted to apply, on this singular occasion, the well-known fable of the dispute between the lion and the man.
Neither the spirit, nor the power, nor the reputation of Attila were diminished by the failure of the Gallic expedition. In the following spring, he repeated his request for Princess Honoria and her inherited treasures. The request was once again rejected or avoided; so the angry lover immediately took action, crossed the Alps, invaded Italy, and besieged Aquileia with a countless army of Barbarians. These Barbarians were inexperienced in the techniques of conducting a formal siege, which, even in ancient times, required some knowledge or at least some experience in the mechanical arts. However, the work that was needed could be done by thousands of provincials and captives, whose lives were sacrificed without mercy. The skills of the Roman craftsmen could be corrupted to the detriment of their own homeland. The walls of Aquileia were attacked by a formidable array of battering rams, movable towers, and engines that hurled stones, darts, and fire; and the king of the Huns used the powerful impulses of hope, fear, rivalry, and self-interest to undermine the only barrier that stood between him and the conquest of Italy. At that time, Aquileia was one of the wealthiest, most populous, and strongest cities along the Adriatic coast. The Gothic allies, who seemed to have served under their native leaders, Alaric and Attila, brought their fearless spirit; and the citizens still remembered the glorious and successful resistance that their forefathers had offered against a fierce, relentless Barbarian who dishonored the majesty of the Roman empire. Three months were spent ineffectively besieging Aquileia, until the lack of supplies and the complaints of his army forced Attila to abandon the campaign and reluctantly order his troops to take down their tents the next morning and start their retreat. However, while he rode around the walls, feeling pensive, angry, and disappointed, he noticed a stork preparing to leave her nest in one of the towers, preparing to fly away with her young. He seized this seemingly trivial incident, which chance had presented to superstition, and exclaimed in a loud and cheerful voice that such a domestic bird, so closely associated with human society, would never abandon her home unless those towers were doomed to destruction and solitude. This favorable omen inspired a renewed confidence in victory; the siege was resumed with renewed vigor; a large breach was created in the section of the wall where the stork had flown away; the Huns charged the assault with unstoppable fury; and the next generation could hardly recognize the ruins of Aquileia. After this devastating punishment, Attila continued his march; as he passed, the cities of Altinum, Concordia, and Padua were reduced to heaps of stones and ashes. The inland towns, Vicenza, Verona, and Bergamo, fell victim to the ruthless cruelty of the Huns. Milan and Pavia surrendered without resistance, losing their wealth, and praised the unusual mercy that spared public and private buildings from the flames and saved the lives of the captured multitude. The popular stories from Comum, Turin, or Modena may be questionable, yet they align with more reliable evidence to prove that Attila spread his destruction across the rich plains of modern Lombardy, which are divided by the Po River and bordered by the Alps and Apennines. When he took control of the royal palace in Milan, he was surprised and offended by a painting that depicted the Caesars seated on their thrones, with the princes of Scythia bowing at their feet. The revenge he inflicted on this symbol of Roman arrogance was harmless but clever. He ordered a painter to flip the figures and their postures; the emperors were depicted on the same canvas approaching in a submissive manner to empty their bags of tribute gold before the throne of the Scythian king. The onlookers must have acknowledged the accuracy and appropriateness of the change; and they were perhaps tempted to apply the well-known fable of the dispute between the lion and the man to this unusual situation.
It is a saying worthy of the ferocious pride of Attila, that the grass never grew on the spot where his horse had trod. Yet the savage destroyer undesignedly laid the foundation of a republic, which revived, in the feudal state of Europe, the art and spirit of commercial industry. The celebrated name of Venice, or Venetia, was formerly diffused over a large and fertile province of Italy, from the confines of Pannonia to the River Addua, and from the Po to the Rhætian and Julian Alps. Before the irruption of the Barbarians, fifty Venetian cities flourished in peace and prosperity: Aquileia was placed in the most conspicuous station: but the ancient dignity of Padua was supported by agriculture and manufactures; and the property of five hundred citizens, who were entitled to the equestrian rank, must have amounted, at the strictest computation, to one million seven hundred thousand pounds. Many families of Aquileia, Padua, and the adjacent towns, who fled from the sword of the Huns, found a safe, though obscure, refuge in the neighboring islands. At the extremity of the Gulf, where the Adriatic feebly imitates the tides of the ocean, near a hundred small islands are separated by shallow water from the continent, and protected from the waves by several long slips of land, which admit the entrance of vessels through some secret and narrow channels. Till the middle of the fifth century, these remote and sequestered spots remained without cultivation, with few inhabitants, and almost without a name. But the manners of the Venetian fugitives, their arts and their government, were gradually formed by their new situation; and one of the epistles of Cassiodorus, which describes their condition about seventy years afterwards, may be considered as the primitive monument of the republic. The minister of Theodoric compares them, in his quaint declamatory style, to water-fowl, who had fixed their nests on the bosom of the waves; and though he allows, that the Venetian provinces had formerly contained many noble families, he insinuates, that they were now reduced by misfortune to the same level of humble poverty. Fish was the common, and almost the universal, food of every rank: their only treasure consisted in the plenty of salt, which they extracted from the sea: and the exchange of that commodity, so essential to human life, was substituted in the neighboring markets to the currency of gold and silver. A people, whose habitations might be doubtfully assigned to the earth or water, soon became alike familiar with the two elements; and the demands of avarice succeeded to those of necessity. The islanders, who, from Grado to Chiozza, were intimately connected with each other, penetrated into the heart of Italy, by the secure, though laborious, navigation of the rivers and inland canals. Their vessels, which were continually increasing in size and number, visited all the harbors of the Gulf; and the marriage which Venice annually celebrates with the Adriatic, was contracted in her early infancy. The epistle of Cassiodorus, the Prætorian præfect, is addressed to the maritime tribunes; and he exhorts them, in a mild tone of authority, to animate the zeal of their countrymen for the public service, which required their assistance to transport the magazines of wine and oil from the province of Istria to the royal city of Ravenna. The ambiguous office of these magistrates is explained by the tradition, that, in the twelve principal islands, twelve tribunes, or judges, were created by an annual and popular election. The existence of the Venetian republic under the Gothic kingdom of Italy, is attested by the same authentic record, which annihilates their lofty claim of original and perpetual independence.
It’s said, with the fierce pride of Attila, that grass never grew where his horse stepped. Yet, the ruthless conqueror inadvertently laid the groundwork for a republic that revived the art and spirit of trade in Europe’s feudal era. The renowned name of Venice, or Venetia, once covered a vast and rich region of Italy, stretching from Pannonia's borders to the River Addua, and from the Po to the Rhætian and Julian Alps. Before the Barbarian invasions, fifty Venetian cities thrived in peace and prosperity: Aquileia held the most prominent position, while Padua's ancient status rested on agriculture and manufacturing; the assets of five hundred citizens who held equestrian rank would have totaled, at least, one million seven hundred thousand pounds. Many families from Aquileia, Padua, and the surrounding towns, fleeing from the Huns’ sword, found a safe, albeit obscure, shelter in the nearby islands. At the far end of the Gulf, where the Adriatic barely mimics ocean tides, about a hundred small islands sit separated by shallow waters from the mainland, sheltered from waves by several long strips of land that allow vessels to enter through narrow, hidden channels. Until the mid-fifth century, these isolated spots remained uncultivated, sparsely populated, and almost nameless. However, the ways of the Venetian refugees, their crafts, and their governance gradually evolved due to their new environment; and one of Cassiodorus's letters, describing their situation roughly seventy years later, serves as an early record of the republic. The minister of Theodoric, in his quirky, rhetorical style, compares them to waterfowl that have made their nests on the waves' surface; while acknowledging that the Venetian provinces once hosted many noble families, he hints that misfortune had now brought them to a level of humble poverty. Fish was the common and nearly universal food for everyone; their only treasure was the abundance of salt they harvested from the sea, and this vital commodity replaced gold and silver in nearby markets. A people whose homes could be uncertainly attributed to land or water quickly became accustomed to both realms, and the needs of greed took over from those of survival. The islanders, closely linked from Grado to Chiozza, navigated into the heart of Italy through the secure yet labor-intensive rivers and inland canals. Their ships, constantly growing in size and number, visited all the Gulf's harbors, and the annual marriage Venice celebrates with the Adriatic began in her early days. Cassiodorus's letter, addressed to the maritime tribunes, encourages them, in a gentle tone of authority, to inspire their fellow citizens to support the public service, which needed their help to transport wine and oil from the Istria province to the royal city of Ravenna. The ambiguous roles of these magistrates are explained by the tradition that, on the twelve main islands, twelve tribunes or judges were elected annually through popular vote. The existence of the Venetian republic under the Gothic kingdom of Italy is confirmed by the same credible record that undermines their lofty claim of original and lasting independence.
The Italians, who had long since renounced the exercise of arms, were surprised, after forty years' peace, by the approach of a formidable Barbarian, whom they abhorred, as the enemy of their religion, as well as of their republic. Amidst the general consternation, Ætius alone was incapable of fear; but it was impossible that he should achieve, alone and unassisted, any military exploits worthy of his former renown. The Barbarians who had defended Gaul, refused to march to the relief of Italy; and the succors promised by the Eastern emperor were distant and doubtful. Since Ætius, at the head of his domestic troops, still maintained the field, and harassed or retarded the march of Attila, he never showed himself more truly great, than at the time when his conduct was blamed by an ignorant and ungrateful people. If the mind of Valentinian had been susceptible of any generous sentiments, he would have chosen such a general for his example and his guide. But the timid grandson of Theodosius, instead of sharing the dangers, escaped from the sound of war; and his hasty retreat from Ravenna to Rome, from an impregnable fortress to an open capital, betrayed his secret intention of abandoning Italy, as soon as the danger should approach his Imperial person. This shameful abdication was suspended, however, by the spirit of doubt and delay, which commonly adheres to pusillanimous counsels, and sometimes corrects their pernicious tendency. The Western emperor, with the senate and people of Rome, embraced the more salutary resolution of deprecating, by a solemn and suppliant embassy, the wrath of Attila. This important commission was accepted by Avienus, who, from his birth and riches, his consular dignity, the numerous train of his clients, and his personal abilities, held the first rank in the Roman senate. The specious and artful character of Avienus was admirably qualified to conduct a negotiation either of public or private interest: his colleague Trigetius had exercised the Prætorian præfecture of Italy; and Leo, bishop of Rome, consented to expose his life for the safety of his flock. The genius of Leo was exercised and displayed in the public misfortunes; and he has deserved the appellation of Great, by the successful zeal with which he labored to establish his opinions and his authority, under the venerable names of orthodox faith and ecclesiastical discipline. The Roman ambassadors were introduced to the tent of Attila, as he lay encamped at the place where the slow-winding Mincius is lost in the foaming waves of the Lake Benacus, and trampled, with his Scythian cavalry, the farms of Catullus and Virgil. The Barbarian monarch listened with favorable, and even respectful, attention; and the deliverance of Italy was purchased by the immense ransom, or dowry, of the princess Honoria. The state of his army might facilitate the treaty, and hasten his retreat. Their martial spirit was relaxed by the wealth and indolence of a warm climate. The shepherds of the North, whose ordinary food consisted of milk and raw flesh, indulged themselves too freely in the use of bread, of wine, and of meat, prepared and seasoned by the arts of cookery; and the progress of disease revenged in some measure the injuries of the Italians. When Attila declared his resolution of carrying his victorious arms to the gates of Rome, he was admonished by his friends, as well as by his enemies, that Alaric had not long survived the conquest of the eternal city. His mind, superior to real danger, was assaulted by imaginary terrors; nor could he escape the influence of superstition, which had so often been subservient to his designs. The pressing eloquence of Leo, his majestic aspect and sacerdotal robes, excited the veneration of Attila for the spiritual father of the Christians. The apparition of the two apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, who menaced the Barbarian with instant death, if he rejected the prayer of their successor, is one of the noblest legends of ecclesiastical tradition. The safety of Rome might deserve the interposition of celestial beings; and some indulgence is due to a fable, which has been represented by the pencil of Raphael, and the chisel of Algardi.
The Italians, who had long given up fighting, were shocked, after forty years of peace, by the approach of a powerful Barbarian, whom they hated as the enemy of both their religion and their republic. In the midst of the widespread panic, Ætius alone was fearless; however, it was impossible for him to achieve any military feats worthy of his past glory all by himself. The Barbarians who had defended Gaul refused to march to Italy's aid, and the help promised by the Eastern emperor was far away and uncertain. While Ætius, leading his troops, still held the field and hindered Attila's advance, he never seemed more truly great than when his actions were criticized by an ungrateful and ignorant public. If Valentinian had been capable of any noble feelings, he would have looked to such a general for inspiration and guidance. But the cowardly grandson of Theodosius, instead of facing the dangers, fled from the sounds of war; his hurried escape from Ravenna to Rome, from a secure fortress to an exposed capital, revealed his secret plan to abandon Italy as soon as the threat neared him. However, this shameful abdication was postponed by the hesitation and indecision that often cling to cowardly advice, which sometimes tempers their harmful effects. The Western emperor, along with the senate and the people of Rome, decided to take a more prudent approach by sending a solemn, pleading delegation to appeal to Attila’s mercy. This crucial mission was accepted by Avienus, who, because of his birth, wealth, consular status, numerous clients, and personal skills, held a prominent position in the Roman senate. The clever and manipulative nature of Avienus was perfectly suited for negotiating both public and private matters: his colleague Trigetius had held the position of Praetorian prefect of Italy; and Leo, the bishop of Rome, agreed to risk his life for the safety of his community. Leo’s wisdom was tested in times of crisis, and he earned the title of Great for his passionate efforts to promote his beliefs and authority under the respected banners of orthodox faith and ecclesiastical order. The Roman ambassadors were introduced to Attila’s tent as he camped near where the winding Mincius flows into the churning waves of Lake Benacus, trampling the lands of Catullus and Virgil with his Scythian cavalry. The Barbarian king listened with interest and even respect; the salvation of Italy was secured by the enormous ransom, or dowry, of Princess Honoria. The condition of his army might have made the agreement easier and sped up his retreat. Their fighting spirit had weakened due to the luxury and laziness of a warm climate. The northern shepherds, whose usual diet was milk and raw meat, indulged excessively in bread, wine, and meat prepared by skilled cooks, and the spread of disease somewhat avenged the wrongs done to the Italians. When Attila declared his intention to bring his victorious army to the gates of Rome, his friends and enemies both warned him that Alaric had not lived long after conquering the eternal city. Though he could face real danger, fantasy fears troubled him; he wasn’t immune to the influence of superstition, which had often aided his plans. The compelling speech of Leo, his majestic appearance, and his priestly robes earned Attila's respect for the spiritual leader of the Christians. The vision of the two apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, who threatened the Barbarian with instant death if he ignored their successor’s plea, is one of the greatest legends in church tradition. The safety of Rome could indeed warrant the intervention of heavenly beings; thus, some leniency is warranted for a tale portrayed by Raphael's brush and Algardi’s chisel.
Before the king of the Huns evacuated Italy, he threatened to return more dreadful, and more implacable, if his bride, the princess Honoria, were not delivered to his ambassadors within the term stipulated by the treaty. Yet, in the mean while, Attila relieved his tender anxiety, by adding a beautiful maid, whose name was Ildico, to the list of his innumerable wives. Their marriage was celebrated with barbaric pomp and festivity, at his wooden palace beyond the Danube; and the monarch, oppressed with wine and sleep, retired at a late hour from the banquet to the nuptial bed. His attendants continued to respect his pleasures, or his repose, the greatest part of the ensuing day, till the unusual silence alarmed their fears and suspicions; and, after attempting to awaken Attila by loud and repeated cries, they at length broke into the royal apartment. They found the trembling bride sitting by the bedside, hiding her face with her veil, and lamenting her own danger, as well as the death of the king, who had expired during the night. An artery had suddenly burst: and as Attila lay in a supine posture, he was suffocated by a torrent of blood, which, instead of finding a passage through the nostrils, regurgitated into the lungs and stomach. His body was solemnly exposed in the midst of the plain, under a silken pavilion; and the chosen squadrons of the Huns, wheeling round in measured evolutions, chanted a funeral song to the memory of a hero, glorious in his life, invincible in his death, the father of his people, the scourge of his enemies, and the terror of the world. According to their national custom, the Barbarians cut off a part of their hair, gashed their faces with unseemly wounds, and bewailed their valiant leader as he deserved, not with the tears of women, but with the blood of warriors. The remains of Attila were enclosed within three coffins, of gold, of silver, and of iron, and privately buried in the night: the spoils of nations were thrown into his grave; the captives who had opened the ground were inhumanly massacred; and the same Huns, who had indulged such excessive grief, feasted, with dissolute and intemperate mirth, about the recent sepulchre of their king. It was reported at Constantinople, that on the fortunate night on which he expired, Marcian beheld in a dream the bow of Attila broken asunder: and the report may be allowed to prove, how seldom the image of that formidable Barbarian was absent from the mind of a Roman emperor.
Before the king of the Huns left Italy, he threatened to come back even more fearsome and relentless if his bride, Princess Honoria, wasn’t handed over to his ambassadors by the agreed deadline. Meanwhile, Attila eased his anxiety by marrying a beautiful girl named Ildico, adding her to his long list of wives. They celebrated their marriage with wild festivities at his wooden palace beyond the Danube. After a night of drinking and eating, the king retired late to his wedding bed. His attendants respected his need for pleasure and rest for most of the next day, until they grew worried about the unusual silence. After trying to wake Attila with loud calls, they finally broke into the royal chamber. There they found the frightened bride sitting by the bed, hiding her face with her veil, mourning both her danger and the death of the king, who had passed away during the night. An artery had suddenly burst, and as Attila lay on his back, he choked on a flood of blood that didn’t exit through his nose but filled his lungs and stomach instead. His body was solemnly displayed in the middle of the plain under a silk pavilion, while the select squads of Huns performed precise movements around him, singing a funeral song to honor a hero who was glorious in life, invincible in death, a father to his people, a scourge to his enemies, and a terror to the world. Following their customs, the Barbarians cut their hair, marked their bodies with deep wounds, and mourned their brave leader as he deserved—not with women’s tears, but with the blood of warriors. Attila's remains were placed in three coffins made of gold, silver, and iron, and were secretly buried at night; treasures from conquered nations were thrown into his grave, and the captives who dug the grave were ruthlessly killed. Ironically, those same Huns, who had displayed such profound grief, later feasted jovially and without restraint near their king's recent tomb. It was reported in Constantinople that on the fateful night of his death, Marcian dreamed of Attila’s bow breaking, suggesting how rarely the image of that fearsome Barbarian left the mind of a Roman emperor.
The revolution which subverted the empire of the Huns, established the fame of Attila, whose genius alone had sustained the huge and disjointed fabric. After his death, the boldest chieftains aspired to the rank of kings; the most powerful kings refused to acknowledge a superior; and the numerous sons, whom so many various mothers bore to the deceased monarch, divided and disputed, like a private inheritance, the sovereign command of the nations of Germany and Scythia. The bold Ardaric felt and represented the disgrace of this servile partition; and his subjects, the warlike Gepidæ, with the Ostrogoths, under the conduct of three valiant brothers, encouraged their allies to vindicate the rights of freedom and royalty. In a bloody and decisive conflict on the banks of the River Netad, in Pannonia, the lance of the Gepidæ, the sword of the Goths, the arrows of the Huns, the Suevic infantry, the light arms of the Heruli, and the heavy weapons of the Alani, encountered or supported each other; and the victory of the Ardaric was accompanied with the slaughter of thirty thousand of his enemies. Ellac, the eldest son of Attila, lost his life and crown in the memorable battle of Netad: his early valor had raised him to the throne of the Acatzires, a Scythian people, whom he subdued; and his father, who loved the superior merit, would have envied the death of Ellac. His brother, Dengisich, with an army of Huns, still formidable in their flight and ruin, maintained his ground above fifteen years on the banks of the Danube. The palace of Attila, with the old country of Dacia, from the Carpathian hills to the Euxine, became the seat of a new power, which was erected by Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ. The Pannonian conquests from Vienna to Sirmium, were occupied by the Ostrogoths; and the settlements of the tribes, who had so bravely asserted their native freedom, were irregularly distributed, according to the measure of their respective strength. Surrounded and oppressed by the multitude of his father's slaves, the kingdom of Dengisich was confined to the circle of his wagons; his desperate courage urged him to invade the Eastern empire: he fell in battle; and his head ignominiously exposed in the Hippodrome, exhibited a grateful spectacle to the people of Constantinople. Attila had fondly or superstitiously believed, that Irnac, the youngest of his sons, was destined to perpetuate the glories of his race. The character of that prince, who attempted to moderate the rashness of his brother Dengisich, was more suitable to the declining condition of the Huns; and Irnac, with his subject hordes, retired into the heart of the Lesser Scythia. They were soon overwhelmed by a torrent of new Barbarians, who followed the same road which their own ancestors had formerly discovered. The Geougen, or Avares, whose residence is assigned by the Greek writers to the shores of the ocean, impelled the adjacent tribes; till at length the Igours of the North, issuing from the cold Siberian regions, which produce the most valuable furs, spread themselves over the desert, as far as the Borysthenes and the Caspian gates; and finally extinguished the empire of the Huns.
The revolution that toppled the Hunnic empire established the legacy of Attila, whose brilliance had kept the disjointed structure intact. After his death, the most daring leaders sought crowns for themselves; the strongest kings refused to accept anyone as their superior; and the many sons born to various mothers of the fallen king fought over the control of the nations of Germany and Scythia as if it were personal property. The courageous Ardaric recognized and fought against this disgraceful division; his subjects, the warlike Gepidæ, along with the Ostrogoths led by three brave brothers, rallied their allies to defend their rights to freedom and royalty. In a bloody and decisive battle on the banks of the River Netad in Pannonia, the Gepidæ's lances, the Gothic swords, the Hunnic arrows, the Suevic infantry, the light arms of the Heruli, and the heavy weapons of the Alani clashed, resulting in Ardaric's victory and the deaths of thirty thousand of his enemies. Ellac, Attila's eldest son, lost both his life and his crown in the memorable battle of Netad; his early bravery had earned him the throne of the Acatzires, a Scythian people he had conquered, and his father, who admired exceptional talent, would have envied Ellac's death. His brother, Dengisich, with a still-powerful army of Huns, held his ground along the Danube for over fifteen years. Attila's palace, along with the old Dacian territory from the Carpathian hills to the Euxine, became the center of a new power established by Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ. The Ostrogoths occupied the Pannonian conquests from Vienna to Sirmium, while the tribe settlements, which had bravely asserted their freedom, were distributed unevenly based on their respective strengths. Surrounded and oppressed by numerous followers of his father, Dengisich's kingdom was limited to the area within his wagons; driven by desperation, he attempted to invade the Eastern empire but fell in battle, with his head displayed disgracefully in the Hippodrome, a grim spectacle for the people of Constantinople. Attila had either affectionately or superstitiously believed that Irnac, his youngest son, would carry on his family's legacy. Irnac's character, which sought to temper his brother Dengisich's reckless tendencies, was more fitting for the Huns' waning power; he and his followers retreated into the heart of Lesser Scythia. They were soon overwhelmed by a wave of new barbarians following the same paths that their ancestors had once discovered. The Geougen, or Avares, whose territory was said by Greek writers to stretch along the ocean shores, pushed neighboring tribes until eventually, the Igours from the cold Siberian regions, rich in valuable furs, spread across the desert as far as the Borysthenes and the Caspian gates, ultimately ending the Hunnic empire.
Such an event might contribute to the safety of the Eastern empire, under the reign of a prince who conciliated the friendship, without forfeiting the esteem, of the Barbarians. But the emperor of the West, the feeble and dissolute Valentinian, who had reached his thirty-fifth year without attaining the age of reason or courage, abused this apparent security, to undermine the foundations of his own throne, by the murder of the patrician Ætius. From the instinct of a base and jealous mind, he hated the man who was universally celebrated as the terror of the Barbarians, and the support of the republic; and his new favorite, the eunuch Heraclius, awakened the emperor from the supine lethargy, which might be disguised, during the life of Placidia, by the excuse of filial piety. The fame of Ætius, his wealth and dignity, the numerous and martial train of Barbarian followers, his powerful dependants, who filled the civil offices of the state, and the hopes of his son Gaudentius, who was already contracted to Eudoxia, the emperor's daughter, had raised him above the rank of a subject. The ambitious designs, of which he was secretly accused, excited the fears, as well as the resentment, of Valentinian. Ætius himself, supported by the consciousness of his merit, his services, and perhaps his innocence, seems to have maintained a haughty and indiscreet behavior. The patrician offended his sovereign by a hostile declaration; he aggravated the offence, by compelling him to ratify, with a solemn oath, a treaty of reconciliation and alliance; he proclaimed his suspicions, he neglected his safety; and from a vain confidence that the enemy, whom he despised, was incapable even of a manly crime, he rashly ventured his person in the palace of Rome. Whilst he urged, perhaps with intemperate vehemence, the marriage of his son, Valentinian, drawing his sword, the first sword he had ever drawn, plunged it in the breast of a general who had saved his empire: his courtiers and eunuchs ambitiously struggled to imitate their master; and Ætius, pierced with a hundred wounds, fell dead in the royal presence. Boethius, the Prætorian præfect, was killed at the same moment, and before the event could be divulged, the principal friends of the patrician were summoned to the palace, and separately murdered. The horrid deed, palliated by the specious names of justice and necessity, was immediately communicated by the emperor to his soldiers, his subjects, and his allies. The nations, who were strangers or enemies to Ætius, generously deplored the unworthy fate of a hero: the Barbarians, who had been attached to his service, dissembled their grief and resentment: and the public contempt, which had been so long entertained for Valentinian, was at once converted into deep and universal abhorrence. Such sentiments seldom pervade the walls of a palace; yet the emperor was confounded by the honest reply of a Roman, whose approbation he had not disdained to solicit. "I am ignorant, sir, of your motives or provocations; I only know, that you have acted like a man who cuts off his right hand with his left."
Such an event could enhance the safety of the Eastern empire, during the reign of a prince who gained the friendship of the Barbarians without losing their respect. But the emperor of the West, the weak and decadent Valentinian, who had reached thirty-five without growing in reason or courage, misused this apparent security to undermine his own throne by murdering the patrician Ætius. Driven by a petty and jealous mindset, he despised the man who was widely regarded as the terror of the Barbarians and a pillar of the republic. His new favorite, the eunuch Heraclius, roused the emperor from the lazy stupor that could be hidden, while Placidia was alive, under the guise of filial duty. The fame, wealth, and standing of Ætius, along with his numerous and martial Barbarian followers, his powerful allies in government, and the prospects of his son Gaudentius—already engaged to Eudoxia, the emperor’s daughter—had elevated him beyond the status of a mere subject. The ambitious plots he was secretly accused of fueled both Valentinian's fears and anger. Ætius himself, bolstered by the awareness of his own worth, his contributions, and perhaps his innocence, seemed to maintain a proud and indiscreet demeanor. The patrician offended his ruler with a confrontational declaration; he compounded the insult by forcing the emperor to solemnly vow to a treaty of reconciliation and alliance; he expressed his suspicions, disregarded his safety; and with a foolish belief that the supposed enemy he looked down on was incapable of a serious crime, he recklessly risked his life in the palace of Rome. While he urged, perhaps too forcefully, for his son’s marriage, Valentinian, drawing his sword for the first time, stabbed the general who had saved his empire: his courtiers and eunuchs eagerly tried to emulate their master; and Ætius, struck with numerous wounds, died in front of the ruler. Boethius, the Prætorian prefect, died at the same time, and before the news could spread, the key allies of the patrician were summoned to the palace and murdered one by one. The horrific act, justified with deceptive terms like justice and necessity, was quickly relayed by the emperor to his soldiers, subjects, and allies. Those who were strangers or enemies of Ætius generously mourned the undeserved fate of a hero: the Barbarians, once loyal to him, masked their sorrow and anger; and the widespread disdain that had long been directed at Valentinian transformed into deep and universal loathing. Such feelings rarely echo within the palace walls; yet the emperor was taken aback by the honest response of a Roman he had not hesitated to ask for approval. "I don’t know, sir, your reasons or provocations; I only know that you’ve acted like a man who cuts off his right hand with his left."
The luxury of Rome seems to have attracted the long and frequent visits of Valentinian; who was consequently more despised at Rome than in any other part of his dominions. A republican spirit was insensibly revived in the senate, as their authority, and even their supplies, became necessary for the support of his feeble government. The stately demeanor of an hereditary monarch offended their pride; and the pleasures of Valentinian were injurious to the peace and honor of noble families. The birth of the empress Eudoxia was equal to his own, and her charms and tender affection deserved those testimonies of love which her inconstant husband dissipated in vague and unlawful amours. Petronius Maximus, a wealthy senator of the Anician family, who had been twice consul, was possessed of a chaste and beautiful wife: her obstinate resistance served only to irritate the desires of Valentinian; and he resolved to accomplish them, either by stratagem or force. Deep gaming was one of the vices of the court: the emperor, who, by chance or contrivance, had gained from Maximus a considerable sum, uncourteously exacted his ring as a security for the debt; and sent it by a trusty messenger to his wife, with an order, in her husband's name, that she should immediately attend the empress Eudoxia. The unsuspecting wife of Maximus was conveyed in her litter to the Imperial palace; the emissaries of her impatient lover conducted her to a remote and silent bed-chamber; and Valentinian violated, without remorse, the laws of hospitality. Her tears, when she returned home, her deep affliction, and her bitter reproaches against a husband whom she considered as the accomplice of his own shame, excited Maximus to a just revenge; the desire of revenge was stimulated by ambition; and he might reasonably aspire, by the free suffrage of the Roman senate, to the throne of a detested and despicable rival. Valentinian, who supposed that every human breast was devoid, like his own, of friendship and gratitude, had imprudently admitted among his guards several domestics and followers of Ætius. Two of these, of Barbarian race were persuaded to execute a sacred and honorable duty, by punishing with death the assassin of their patron; and their intrepid courage did not long expect a favorable moment. Whilst Valentinian amused himself, in the field of Mars, with the spectacle of some military sports, they suddenly rushed upon him with drawn weapons, despatched the guilty Heraclius, and stabbed the emperor to the heart, without the least opposition from his numerous train, who seemed to rejoice in the tyrant's death. Such was the fate of Valentinian the Third, the last Roman emperor of the family of Theodosius. He faithfully imitated the hereditary weakness of his cousin and his two uncles, without inheriting the gentleness, the purity, the innocence, which alleviate, in their characters, the want of spirit and ability. Valentinian was less excusable, since he had passions, without virtues: even his religion was questionable; and though he never deviated into the paths of heresy, he scandalized the pious Christians by his attachment to the profane arts of magic and divination.
The luxury of Rome seems to have drawn long and frequent visits from Valentinian, who was consequently more despised in Rome than anywhere else in his empire. A spirit of republicanism quietly revived in the senate as their authority, and even their resources, became essential for supporting his weak government. The grand demeanor of a hereditary monarch offended their pride, and Valentinian's indulgences harmed the peace and honor of noble families. Empress Eudoxia, born of equal status, had a charm and tender affection that deserved the love her fickle husband wasted on vague and immoral affairs. Petronius Maximus, a wealthy senator from the Anician family and a two-time consul, had a chaste and beautiful wife. Her stubborn refusal only fueled Valentinian's desires, and he decided to fulfill them through either cunning or force. Gambling was one of the court's vices, and the emperor, whether by chance or design, had managed to win a considerable sum from Maximus. Unceremoniously, he demanded his ring as collateral for the debt and sent it by a trusted messenger to Maximus's wife, instructing her, in her husband’s name, to report to Empress Eudoxia immediately. The unsuspecting wife was carried in her litter to the Imperial palace; the agents of her impatient lover escorted her to a secluded and quiet bedroom, and Valentinian violated the laws of hospitality without remorse. Her tears upon returning home, her deep sorrow, and her bitter accusations against a husband she saw as complicit in her humiliation triggered a just desire for revenge in Maximus. This desire was further inflamed by ambition, and he could justifiably aspire, with the senate's support, to take the throne of a hated and contemptible rival. Valentinian, believing that everyone lacked the friendship and gratitude he did, foolishly included several servants and allies of Ætius among his guards. Two of these, of Barbarian descent, were convinced to perform an honorable duty by avenging their patron’s death; their bravery did not wait long for the right moment. While Valentinian entertained himself in the Field of Mars with military displays, they suddenly attacked him with drawn weapons, killed the guilty Heraclius, and stabbed the emperor to the heart, receiving no resistance from his numerous retinue, who seemed to celebrate the tyrant's death. Such was the fate of Valentinian III, the last Roman emperor of the Theodosian family. He mirrored the hereditary weakness of his cousin and uncles, without inheriting the kindness, purity, and innocence that somewhat mitigated their lack of spirit and ability. Valentinian was less excusable, as he had passions without virtues: even his faith was questionable; though he never strayed into heresy, he scandalized devout Christians with his interest in the unholy arts of magic and divination.
As early as the time of Cicero and Varro, it was the opinion of the Roman augurs, that the twelve vultures which Romulus had seen, represented the twelve centuries, assigned for the fatal period of his city. This prophecy, disregarded perhaps in the season of health and prosperity, inspired the people with gloomy apprehensions, when the twelfth century, clouded with disgrace and misfortune, was almost elapsed; and even posterity must acknowledge with some surprise, that the arbitrary interpretation of an accidental or fabulous circumstance has been seriously verified in the downfall of the Western empire. But its fall was announced by a clearer omen than the flight of vultures: the Roman government appeared every day less formidable to its enemies, more odious and oppressive to its subjects. The taxes were multiplied with the public distress; economy was neglected in proportion as it became necessary; and the injustice of the rich shifted the unequal burden from themselves to the people, whom they defrauded of the indulgences that might sometimes have alleviated their misery. The severe inquisition which confiscated their goods, and tortured their persons, compelled the subjects of Valentinian to prefer the more simple tyranny of the Barbarians, to fly to the woods and mountains, or to embrace the vile and abject condition of mercenary servants. They abjured and abhorred the name of Roman citizens, which had formerly excited the ambition of mankind. The Armorican provinces of Gaul, and the greatest part of Spain, were-thrown into a state of disorderly independence, by the confederations of the Bagaudæ; and the Imperial ministers pursued with proscriptive laws, and ineffectual arms, the rebels whom they had made. If all the Barbarian conquerors had been annihilated in the same hour, their total destruction would not have restored the empire of the West: and if Rome still survived, she survived the loss of freedom, of virtue, and of honor.
As early as the time of Cicero and Varro, Roman augurs believed that the twelve vultures Romulus saw symbolized the twelve centuries designated for the eventual downfall of his city. This prophecy, perhaps overlooked during times of health and prosperity, filled the people with dark fears as the twelfth century, marred by disgrace and misfortune, was nearing its end. Even future generations would be surprised to find that the random interpretation of a seemingly trivial or mythical event had become a reality in the collapse of the Western Empire. However, its decline was indicated by clearer signs than the flight of vultures: the Roman government seemed less intimidating to its adversaries each day, and more hated and oppressive to its citizens. Taxes piled up alongside public suffering; frugality was ignored just when it was most needed; and the wealthy shifted the heavy burden of injustice off themselves onto the people, robbing them of the indulgences that might have lessened their suffering. The harsh oppression that seized their property and tortured them led the subjects of Valentinian to prefer the more straightforward tyranny of the Barbarians, to flee to the woods and mountains, or to accept the degrading condition of mercenary servants. They renounced and despised the title of Roman citizens, which had once stirred great ambition in people. The Armorican provinces of Gaul and most of Spain fell into chaotic independence due to the alliances of the Bagaudæ, while the Imperial officials chased the rebels they had created with punitive laws and ineffective military action. Even if all the Barbarian conquerors had been wiped out in an instant, their complete destruction wouldn’t have restored the Western Empire; and if Rome still existed, it did so at the cost of freedom, virtue, and honor.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part I.
Sack Of Rome By Genseric, King Of The Vandals.—His Naval Depredations.—Succession Of The Last Emperors Of The West, Maximus, Avitus, Majorian, Severus, Anthemius, Olybrius, Glycerius, Nepos, Augustulus.—Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Reign Of Odoacer, The First Barbarian King Of Italy.
Sack of Rome by Genseric, King of the Vandals.—His Naval Attacks.—Succession of the Last Emperors of the West, Maximus, Avitus, Majorian, Severus, Anthemius, Olybrius, Glycerius, Nepos, Augustulus.—Complete End of the Western Empire.—Reign of Odoacer, the First Barbarian King of Italy.
The loss or desolation of the provinces, from the Ocean to the Alps, impaired the glory and greatness of Rome: her internal prosperity was irretrievably destroyed by the separation of Africa. The rapacious Vandals confiscated the patrimonial estates of the senators, and intercepted the regular subsidies, which relieved the poverty and encouraged the idleness of the plebeians. The distress of the Romans was soon aggravated by an unexpected attack; and the province, so long cultivated for their use by industrious and obedient subjects, was armed against them by an ambitious Barbarian. The Vandals and Alani, who followed the successful standard of Genseric, had acquired a rich and fertile territory, which stretched along the coast above ninety days' journey from Tangier to Tripoli; but their narrow limits were pressed and confined, on either side, by the sandy desert and the Mediterranean. The discovery and conquest of the Black nations, that might dwell beneath the torrid zone, could not tempt the rational ambition of Genseric; but he cast his eyes towards the sea; he resolved to create a naval power, and his bold resolution was executed with steady and active perseverance. The woods of Mount Atlas afforded an inexhaustible nursery of timber: his new subjects were skilled in the arts of navigation and ship-building; he animated his daring Vandals to embrace a mode of warfare which would render every maritime country accessible to their arms; the Moors and Africans were allured by the hopes of plunder; and, after an interval of six centuries, the fleets that issued from the port of Carthage again claimed the empire of the Mediterranean. The success of the Vandals, the conquest of Sicily, the sack of Palermo, and the frequent descents on the coast of Lucania, awakened and alarmed the mother of Valentinian, and the sister of Theodosius. Alliances were formed; and armaments, expensive and ineffectual, were prepared, for the destruction of the common enemy; who reserved his courage to encounter those dangers which his policy could not prevent or elude. The designs of the Roman government were repeatedly baffled by his artful delays, ambiguous promises, and apparent concessions; and the interposition of his formidable confederate, the king of the Huns, recalled the emperors from the conquest of Africa to the care of their domestic safety. The revolutions of the palace, which left the Western empire without a defender, and without a lawful prince, dispelled the apprehensions, and stimulated the avarice, of Genseric. He immediately equipped a numerous fleet of Vandals and Moors, and cast anchor at the mouth of the Tyber, about three months after the death of Valentinian, and the elevation of Maximus to the Imperial throne.
The loss or emptiness of the provinces, from the Ocean to the Alps, diminished the glory and greatness of Rome: its internal prosperity was irreparably damaged by the separation of Africa. The greedy Vandals seized the hereditary estates of the senators and interrupted the regular subsidies that eased the poverty and encouraged the laziness of the common people. The suffering of the Romans was soon worsened by an unexpected attack; and the province, long cultivated for their benefit by hardworking and obedient subjects, was turned against them by an ambitious Barbarian. The Vandals and Alani, who followed the successful banner of Genseric, had gained a rich and fertile territory along the coast that spanned more than ninety days' journey from Tangier to Tripoli; but their narrow land was squeezed on both sides by the sandy desert and the Mediterranean. The discovery and conquest of the Black nations living in the hot zone didn’t interest Genseric's rational ambition; instead, he turned his gaze toward the sea. He aimed to build a naval power, and he executed this bold resolution with steady and active determination. The forests of Mount Atlas provided an endless supply of timber: his new subjects were skilled in navigation and shipbuilding; he inspired his daring Vandals to adopt a form of warfare that would make every coastal country vulnerable to their attacks; the Moors and Africans were tempted by promises of plunder; and, after an interval of six centuries, the fleets that set sail from the port of Carthage once again claimed dominance over the Mediterranean. The success of the Vandals, the conquest of Sicily, the sack of Palermo, and frequent raids on the coast of Lucania alarmed the mother of Valentinian and the sister of Theodosius. Alliances were formed; costly and ineffective armaments were prepared to defeat the common enemy; who saved his courage for the dangers his strategy couldn’t prevent or avoid. The plans of the Roman government were repeatedly thwarted by his clever delays, vague promises, and apparent concessions; and the involvement of his powerful ally, the king of the Huns, pulled the emperors away from the conquest of Africa to focus on their domestic safety. The changes in the palace, which left the Western empire without a defender or a legitimate prince, eased Genseric's fears and fueled his greed. He quickly assembled a large fleet of Vandals and Moors and dropped anchor at the mouth of the Tiber, about three months after Valentinian's death and Maximus's rise to the Imperial throne.
The private life of the senator Petronius Maximus was often alleged as a rare example of human felicity. His birth was noble and illustrious, since he descended from the Anician family; his dignity was supported by an adequate patrimony in land and money; and these advantages of fortune were accompanied with liberal arts and decent manners, which adorn or imitate the inestimable gifts of genius and virtue. The luxury of his palace and table was hospitable and elegant. Whenever Maximus appeared in public, he was surrounded by a train of grateful and obsequious clients; and it is possible that among these clients, he might deserve and possess some real friends. His merit was rewarded by the favor of the prince and senate: he thrice exercised the office of Prætorian præfect of Italy; he was twice invested with the consulship, and he obtained the rank of patrician. These civil honors were not incompatible with the enjoyment of leisure and tranquillity; his hours, according to the demands of pleasure or reason, were accurately distributed by a water-clock; and this avarice of time may be allowed to prove the sense which Maximus entertained of his own happiness. The injury which he received from the emperor Valentinian appears to excuse the most bloody revenge. Yet a philosopher might have reflected, that, if the resistance of his wife had been sincere, her chastity was still inviolate, and that it could never be restored if she had consented to the will of the adulterer. A patriot would have hesitated before he plunged himself and his country into those inevitable calamities which must follow the extinction of the royal house of Theodosius. The imprudent Maximus disregarded these salutary considerations; he gratified his resentment and ambition; he saw the bleeding corpse of Valentinian at his feet; and he heard himself saluted Emperor by the unanimous voice of the senate and people. But the day of his inauguration was the last day of his happiness. He was imprisoned (such is the lively expression of Sidonius) in the palace; and after passing a sleepless night, he sighed that he had attained the summit of his wishes, and aspired only to descend from the dangerous elevation. Oppressed by the weight of the diadem, he communicated his anxious thoughts to his friend and quæstor Fulgentius; and when he looked back with unavailing regret on the secure pleasures of his former life, the emperor exclaimed, "O fortunate Damocles, thy reign began and ended with the same dinner;" a well-known allusion, which Fulgentius afterwards repeated as an instructive lesson for princes and subjects.
The private life of Senator Petronius Maximus was often seen as a rare example of human happiness. He was born into a noble and distinguished family, as he came from the Anician lineage; his status was backed by sufficient wealth in land and money, and these advantages were complemented by his education in the liberal arts and good manners, which reflected the invaluable gifts of talent and virtue. His palace and dining experiences were both welcoming and classy. Whenever Maximus appeared in public, he was surrounded by a crowd of appreciative and obedient clients; and it’s likely that among these clients, he might have had some true friends. His worth earned him the favor of the emperor and the senate: he served three times as the Praetorian Prefect of Italy, was consul twice, and achieved the rank of patrician. These civil honors didn’t prevent him from enjoying leisure and peace; he managed his time precisely with a water clock, which indicates how much he valued his own happiness. The harm he suffered from Emperor Valentinian seems to justify a brutal revenge. However, a philosopher might have reflected that, if his wife's resistance was genuine, her fidelity was still intact, and it could never be reclaimed if she had submitted to the adulterer's wishes. A patriot would have thought twice before dragging himself and his country into the inevitable disasters that would follow the end of the royal house of Theodosius. The reckless Maximus ignored these prudent thoughts; he satisfied his anger and ambition; he saw the bloody body of Valentinian at his feet; and he heard himself named Emperor by the unanimous voices of the senate and the people. But the day of his inauguration was the last day of his happiness. He was imprisoned (as Sidonius vividly expressed) in the palace; and after spending a sleepless night, he lamented that he had reached the peak of his desires, wishing only to escape the dangerous height. Burdened by the weight of the crown, he shared his troubled thoughts with his friend and quaestor Fulgentius; and when he reflected regretfully on the secure joys of his former life, the emperor exclaimed, "O fortunate Damocles, your reign began and ended with the same dinner," a well-known reference that Fulgentius later repeated as a lesson for rulers and citizens.
The reign of Maximus continued about three months. His hours, of which he had lost the command, were disturbed by remorse, or guilt, or terror, and his throne was shaken by the seditions of the soldiers, the people, and the confederate Barbarians. The marriage of his son Paladius with the eldest daughter of the late emperor, might tend to establish the hereditary succession of his family; but the violence which he offered to the empress Eudoxia, could proceed only from the blind impulse of lust or revenge. His own wife, the cause of these tragic events, had been seasonably removed by death; and the widow of Valentinian was compelled to violate her decent mourning, perhaps her real grief, and to submit to the embraces of a presumptuous usurper, whom she suspected as the assassin of her deceased husband. These suspicions were soon justified by the indiscreet confession of Maximus himself; and he wantonly provoked the hatred of his reluctant bride, who was still conscious that she was descended from a line of emperors. From the East, however, Eudoxia could not hope to obtain any effectual assistance; her father and her aunt Pulcheria were dead; her mother languished at Jerusalem in disgrace and exile; and the sceptre of Constantinople was in the hands of a stranger. She directed her eyes towards Carthage; secretly implored the aid of the king of the Vandals; and persuaded Genseric to improve the fair opportunity of disguising his rapacious designs by the specious names of honor, justice, and compassion. Whatever abilities Maximus might have shown in a subordinate station, he was found incapable of administering an empire; and though he might easily have been informed of the naval preparations which were made on the opposite shores of Africa, he expected with supine indifference the approach of the enemy, without adopting any measures of defence, of negotiation, or of a timely retreat. When the Vandals disembarked at the mouth of the Tyber, the emperor was suddenly roused from his lethargy by the clamors of a trembling and exasperated multitude. The only hope which presented itself to his astonished mind was that of a precipitate flight, and he exhorted the senators to imitate the example of their prince. But no sooner did Maximus appear in the streets, than he was assaulted by a shower of stones; a Roman, or a Burgundian soldier, claimed the honor of the first wound; his mangled body was ignominiously cast into the Tyber; the Roman people rejoiced in the punishment which they had inflicted on the author of the public calamities; and the domestics of Eudoxia signalized their zeal in the service of their mistress.
The reign of Maximus lasted about three months. His days, which he had lost control over, were troubled by guilt, fear, or remorse, and his throne was shaken by unrest among the soldiers, the people, and the allied Barbarians. The marriage of his son Paladius to the eldest daughter of the late emperor might have helped secure his family's legacy; however, his violent actions against Empress Eudoxia were driven only by blind lust or revenge. His own wife, the reason for these tragic events, had conveniently passed away; and the widow of Valentinian was forced to abandon her mourning, and perhaps her true grief, to submit to the advances of a bold usurper whom she suspected of having killed her husband. These suspicions were quickly confirmed by Maximus's own careless admission; he foolishly incited the hatred of his unwilling bride, who was still aware of her noble ancestry. However, from the East, Eudoxia had no hope of getting real help; her father and her aunt Pulcheria were dead; her mother was living in disgrace and exile in Jerusalem, and the power of Constantinople was held by a stranger. She turned her gaze towards Carthage; secretly sought help from the king of the Vandals; and convinced Genseric to cloak his greedy intentions under the appealing labels of honor, justice, and compassion. Despite any skills Maximus might have shown in a subordinate role, he proved incapable of governing an empire; and although he could easily have learned about the naval preparations being made on the opposite shores of Africa, he apathetically awaited the enemy's arrival, without taking any defensive actions, negotiating, or planning a timely escape. When the Vandals landed at the mouth of the Tiber, the emperor was suddenly jolted from his stupor by the cries of a terrified and enraged crowd. The only hope that came to his shocked mind was to flee, and he urged the senators to follow his example. But as soon as Maximus appeared in the streets, he was met with a barrage of stones; a Roman or a Burgundian soldier claimed the honor of inflicting the first injury; his mutilated body was shamefully thrown into the Tiber; the Roman people celebrated the punishment they dealt to the source of their troubles; and Eudoxia's servants demonstrated their loyalty to their mistress.
On the third day after the tumult, Genseric boldly advanced from the port of Ostia to the gates of the defenceless city. Instead of a sally of the Roman youth, there issued from the gates an unarmed and venerable procession of the bishop at the head of his clergy. The fearless spirit of Leo, his authority and eloquence, again mitigated the fierceness of a Barbarian conqueror; the king of the Vandals promised to spare the unresisting multitude, to protect the buildings from fire, and to exempt the captives from torture; and although such orders were neither seriously given, nor strictly obeyed, the mediation of Leo was glorious to himself, and in some degree beneficial to his country. But Rome and its inhabitants were delivered to the licentiousness of the Vandals and Moors, whose blind passions revenged the injuries of Carthage. The pillage lasted fourteen days and nights; and all that yet remained of public or private wealth, of sacred or profane treasure, was diligently transported to the vessels of Genseric. Among the spoils, the splendid relics of two temples, or rather of two religions, exhibited a memorable example of the vicissitudes of human and divine things. Since the abolition of Paganism, the Capitol had been violated and abandoned; yet the statues of the gods and heroes were still respected, and the curious roof of gilt bronze was reserved for the rapacious hands of Genseric. The holy instruments of the Jewish worship, the gold table, and the gold candlestick with seven branches, originally framed according to the particular instructions of God himself, and which were placed in the sanctuary of his temple, had been ostentatiously displayed to the Roman people in the triumph of Titus. They were afterwards deposited in the temple of Peace; and at the end of four hundred years, the spoils of Jerusalem were transferred from Rome to Carthage, by a Barbarian who derived his origin from the shores of the Baltic. These ancient monuments might attract the notice of curiosity, as well as of avarice. But the Christian churches, enriched and adorned by the prevailing superstition of the times, afforded more plentiful materials for sacrilege; and the pious liberality of Pope Leo, who melted six silver vases, the gift of Constantine, each of a hundred pounds weight, is an evidence of the damage which he attempted to repair. In the forty-five years that had elapsed since the Gothic invasion, the pomp and luxury of Rome were in some measure restored; and it was difficult either to escape, or to satisfy, the avarice of a conqueror, who possessed leisure to collect, and ships to transport, the wealth of the capital. The Imperial ornaments of the palace, the magnificent furniture and wardrobe, the sideboards of massy plate, were accumulated with disorderly rapine; the gold and silver amounted to several thousand talents; yet even the brass and copper were laboriously removed. Eudoxia herself, who advanced to meet her friend and deliverer, soon bewailed the imprudence of her own conduct. She was rudely stripped of her jewels; and the unfortunate empress, with her two daughters, the only surviving remains of the great Theodosius, was compelled, as a captive, to follow the haughty Vandal; who immediately hoisted sail, and returned with a prosperous navigation to the port of Carthage. Many thousand Romans of both sexes, chosen for some useful or agreeable qualifications, reluctantly embarked on board the fleet of Genseric; and their distress was aggravated by the unfeeling Barbarians, who, in the division of the booty, separated the wives from their husbands, and the children from their parents. The charity of Deogratias, bishop of Carthage, was their only consolation and support. He generously sold the gold and silver plate of the church to purchase the freedom of some, to alleviate the slavery of others, and to assist the wants and infirmities of a captive multitude, whose health was impaired by the hardships which they had suffered in their passage from Italy to Africa. By his order, two spacious churches were converted into hospitals; the sick were distributed into convenient beds, and liberally supplied with food and medicines; and the aged prelate repeated his visits both in the day and night, with an assiduity that surpassed his strength, and a tender sympathy which enhanced the value of his services. Compare this scene with the field of Cannæ; and judge between Hannibal and the successor of St. Cyprian.
On the third day after the chaos, Genseric boldly moved from the port of Ostia to the gates of the defenseless city. Instead of a charge from the Roman youth, a peaceful and respected procession emerged from the gates, led by the bishop and his clergy. The fearless spirit of Leo, along with his authority and eloquence, once again softened the wrath of a Barbarian conqueror; the king of the Vandals promised to spare the unresisting crowd, protect the buildings from fire, and exempt the captives from torture; and although such orders were neither sincerely given nor strictly followed, Leo's mediation was honorable for him and somewhat beneficial to his city. However, Rome and its people fell victim to the reckless behavior of the Vandals and Moors, whose blind anger avenged the wrongs done to Carthage. The looting lasted for fourteen days and nights; everything that was left of public or private wealth, sacred or secular treasures, was hurriedly loaded onto Genseric’s ships. Among the spoils, the magnificent relics of two temples—or rather two religions—served as a stark reminder of the ups and downs of human and divine affairs. Since Paganism's decline, the Capitol had been violated and forsaken; yet the statues of the gods and heroes were still honored, and the intricate gilt bronze roof was reserved for the greedy hands of Genseric. The sacred objects from Jewish worship, including the gold table and the seven-branched candlestick, originally crafted according to God's specific instructions and displayed in the sanctuary of His temple, had been publicly exhibited to the Roman people during Titus's triumph. Later, they were placed in the temple of Peace; and after four hundred years, the spoils of Jerusalem were moved from Rome to Carthage by a Barbarian originating from the shores of the Baltic. These ancient artifacts caught the eye of both curiosity and greed. However, the Christian churches, enriched and beautified by the prevailing superstitions of the time, provided even more opportunities for sacrilege; the generous acts of Pope Leo, who melted down six silver vases weighing a hundred pounds each, gifted by Constantine, testify to the damage he tried to mend. In the forty-five years since the Gothic invasion, the splendor and luxury of Rome had been somewhat restored; it was hard to avoid, or to satisfy, the greed of a conqueror who had the time to gather and ships to carry away the capital's wealth. The Imperial decorations of the palace, the splendid furniture and attire, and the massive silver tableware were collected with careless plunder; the gold and silver totaled several thousand talents, yet even the brass and copper were painstakingly taken away. Eudoxia herself, who came forward to greet her friend and rescuer, soon regretted her impulsive actions. She was brutally stripped of her jewels; and the unfortunate empress, along with her two daughters, the only surviving legacy of the great Theodosius, was forced, as a captive, to follow the arrogant Vandal, who quickly set sail and returned to the port of Carthage. Many thousands of Romans of both genders, selected for some useful or appealing traits, reluctantly boarded Genseric's fleet; their anguish was worsened by the callous Barbarians, who, during the distribution of the loot, separated husbands from wives and children from parents. The charity of Deogratias, bishop of Carthage, was their sole source of comfort and support. He generously sold the church’s gold and silver plates to buy the freedom of some, ease the bondage of others, and help the needs and ailments of a captive crowd, whose health was weakened by the hardships endured during their journey from Italy to Africa. By his command, two large churches were transformed into hospitals; the sick were arranged in comfortable beds and generously provided food and medicine; and the elderly bishop made his rounds both day and night, with a dedication that exceeded his strength, and a genuine compassion that elevated the value of his efforts. Compare this scene with the battlefield of Cannæ; and judge between Hannibal and the successor of St. Cyprian.
The deaths of Ætius and Valentinian had relaxed the ties which held the Barbarians of Gaul in peace and subordination. The sea-coast was infested by the Saxons; the Alemanni and the Franks advanced from the Rhine to the Seine; and the ambition of the Goths seemed to meditate more extensive and permanent conquests. The emperor Maximus relieved himself, by a judicious choice, from the weight of these distant cares; he silenced the solicitations of his friends, listened to the voice of fame, and promoted a stranger to the general command of the forces of Gaul. Avitus, the stranger, whose merit was so nobly rewarded, descended from a wealthy and honorable family in the diocese of Auvergne. The convulsions of the times urged him to embrace, with the same ardor, the civil and military professions: and the indefatigable youth blended the studies of literature and jurisprudence with the exercise of arms and hunting. Thirty years of his life were laudably spent in the public service; he alternately displayed his talents in war and negotiation; and the soldier of Ætius, after executing the most important embassies, was raised to the station of Prætorian præfect of Gaul. Either the merit of Avitus excited envy, or his moderation was desirous of repose, since he calmly retired to an estate, which he possessed in the neighborhood of Clermont. A copious stream, issuing from the mountain, and falling headlong in many a loud and foaming cascade, discharged its waters into a lake about two miles in length, and the villa was pleasantly seated on the margin of the lake. The baths, the porticos, the summer and winter apartments, were adapted to the purposes of luxury and use; and the adjacent country afforded the various prospects of woods, pastures, and meadows. In this retreat, where Avitus amused his leisure with books, rural sports, the practice of husbandry, and the society of his friends, he received the Imperial diploma, which constituted him master-general of the cavalry and infantry of Gaul. He assumed the military command; the Barbarians suspended their fury; and whatever means he might employ, whatever concessions he might be forced to make, the people enjoyed the benefits of actual tranquillity. But the fate of Gaul depended on the Visigoths; and the Roman general, less attentive to his dignity than to the public interest, did not disdain to visit Thoulouse in the character of an ambassador. He was received with courteous hospitality by Theodoric, the king of the Goths; but while Avitus laid the foundations of a solid alliance with that powerful nation, he was astonished by the intelligence, that the emperor Maximus was slain, and that Rome had been pillaged by the Vandals. A vacant throne, which he might ascend without guilt or danger, tempted his ambition; and the Visigoths were easily persuaded to support his claim by their irresistible suffrage. They loved the person of Avitus; they respected his virtues; and they were not insensible of the advantage, as well as honor, of giving an emperor to the West. The season was now approaching, in which the annual assembly of the seven provinces was held at Arles; their deliberations might perhaps be influenced by the presence of Theodoric and his martial brothers; but their choice would naturally incline to the most illustrious of their countrymen. Avitus, after a decent resistance, accepted the Imperial diadem from the representatives of Gaul; and his election was ratified by the acclamations of the Barbarians and provincials. The formal consent of Marcian, emperor of the East, was solicited and obtained; but the senate, Rome, and Italy, though humbled by their recent calamities, submitted with a secret murmur to the presumption of the Gallic usurper.
The deaths of Ætius and Valentinian had weakened the bonds that kept the Barbarians of Gaul peaceful and subordinate. The coastline was being ravaged by the Saxons; the Alemanni and the Franks were moving from the Rhine to the Seine; and the Goths appeared to have ambitions for broader and more lasting conquests. The emperor Maximus relieved himself of these distant concerns through a smart choice; he ignored the pleas of his friends, listened to his ambition, and appointed a stranger to command the forces in Gaul. Avitus, the stranger who was so greatly rewarded, came from a rich and respected family in the Auvergne region. The turmoil of the times drove him to passionately pursue both civil and military careers, blending studies in literature and law with military training and hunting. He spent thirty years of his life commendably in public service, showcasing his talents in both warfare and diplomacy; the soldier of Ætius, after carrying out important missions, was promoted to the role of Prætorian præfect of Gaul. Either Avitus’s achievements sparked envy, or he sought peace, as he quietly retired to an estate near Clermont. A large stream coming from the mountain cascaded loudly into a lake about two miles long, and his villa was nicely situated on its shores. The baths, porticoes, and summer and winter quarters were designed for both luxury and practicality, and the surrounding countryside offered various views of forests, pastures, and meadows. In this retreat, where Avitus spent his free time with books, country sports, farming, and the company of his friends, he received the Imperial diploma that named him master-general of the cavalry and infantry of Gaul. He took on the military command; the Barbarians paused their violence; and whatever strategies he employed or concessions he made, the people enjoyed genuine peace. However, the fate of Gaul depended on the Visigoths, and the Roman general, more focused on the public good than his own prestige, did not hesitate to visit Toulouse as an ambassador. He was treated with warm hospitality by Theodoric, the king of the Goths; but while Avitus was laying the groundwork for a stable alliance with this powerful nation, he was shocked to learn that emperor Maximus had been killed and that Rome had been sacked by the Vandals. The vacant throne, which he could claim without guilt or danger, tempted his ambition; and the Visigoths were easily convinced to support his claim with their powerful backing. They admired Avitus, respected his character, and recognized the advantage and honor of making him emperor of the West. The time for the annual assembly of the seven provinces at Arles was approaching; their discussions might be swayed by the presence of Theodoric and his military brothers, but their choice would naturally lean toward their most distinguished countryman. After some reluctance, Avitus accepted the Imperial crown from the representatives of Gaul, and his election was confirmed with cheers from both the Barbarians and the locals. The official approval of Marcian, emperor of the East, was sought and granted; but the senate, Rome, and Italy, although weakened by their recent misfortunes, submitted with quiet discontent to the arrogance of the Gallic usurper.
Theodoric, to whom Avitus was indebted for the purple, had acquired the Gothic sceptre by the murder of his elder brother Torismond; and he justified this atrocious deed by the design which his predecessor had formed of violating his alliance with the empire. Such a crime might not be incompatible with the virtues of a Barbarian; but the manners of Theodoric were gentle and humane; and posterity may contemplate without terror the original picture of a Gothic king, whom Sidonius had intimately observed, in the hours of peace and of social intercourse. In an epistle, dated from the court of Thoulouse, the orator satisfies the curiosity of one of his friends, in the following description: "By the majesty of his appearance, Theodoric would command the respect of those who are ignorant of his merit; and although he is born a prince, his merit would dignify a private station. He is of a middle stature, his body appears rather plump than fat, and in his well-proportioned limbs agility is united with muscular strength. If you examine his countenance, you will distinguish a high forehead, large shaggy eyebrows, an aquiline nose, thin lips, a regular set of white teeth, and a fair complexion, that blushes more frequently from modesty than from anger. The ordinary distribution of his time, as far as it is exposed to the public view, may be concisely represented. Before daybreak, he repairs, with a small train, to his domestic chapel, where the service is performed by the Arian clergy; but those who presume to interpret his secret sentiments, consider this assiduous devotion as the effect of habit and policy. The rest of the morning is employed in the administration of his kingdom. His chair is surrounded by some military officers of decent aspect and behavior: the noisy crowd of his Barbarian guards occupies the hall of audience; but they are not permitted to stand within the veils or curtains that conceal the council-chamber from vulgar eyes. The ambassadors of the nations are successively introduced: Theodoric listens with attention, answers them with discreet brevity, and either announces or delays, according to the nature of their business, his final resolution. About eight (the second hour) he rises from his throne, and visits either his treasury or his stables. If he chooses to hunt, or at least to exercise himself on horseback, his bow is carried by a favorite youth; but when the game is marked, he bends it with his own hand, and seldom misses the object of his aim: as a king, he disdains to bear arms in such ignoble warfare; but as a soldier, he would blush to accept any military service which he could perform himself. On common days, his dinner is not different from the repast of a private citizen, but every Saturday, many honorable guests are invited to the royal table, which, on these occasions, is served with the elegance of Greece, the plenty of Gaul, and the order and diligence of Italy. The gold or silver plate is less remarkable for its weight than for the brightness and curious workmanship: the taste is gratified without the help of foreign and costly luxury; the size and number of the cups of wine are regulated with a strict regard to the laws of temperance; and the respectful silence that prevails, is interrupted only by grave and instructive conversation. After dinner, Theodoric sometimes indulges himself in a short slumber; and as soon as he wakes, he calls for the dice and tables, encourages his friends to forget the royal majesty, and is delighted when they freely express the passions which are excited by the incidents of play. At this game, which he loves as the image of war, he alternately displays his eagerness, his skill, his patience, and his cheerful temper. If he loses, he laughs; he is modest and silent if he wins. Yet, notwithstanding this seeming indifference, his courtiers choose to solicit any favor in the moments of victory; and I myself, in my applications to the king, have derived some benefit from my losses. About the ninth hour (three o'clock) the tide of business again returns, and flows incessantly till after sunset, when the signal of the royal supper dismisses the weary crowd of suppliants and pleaders. At the supper, a more familiar repast, buffoons and pantomimes are sometimes introduced, to divert, not to offend, the company, by their ridiculous wit: but female singers, and the soft, effeminate modes of music, are severely banished, and such martial tunes as animate the soul to deeds of valor are alone grateful to the ear of Theodoric. He retires from table; and the nocturnal guards are immediately posted at the entrance of the treasury, the palace, and the private apartments."
Theodoric, who received the royal purple from Avitus, gained the Gothic scepter by murdering his older brother Torismond. He justified this horrific act by claiming his brother planned to break his alliance with the empire. Such a crime might not clash with the traits of a Barbarian, but Theodoric's demeanor was gentle and humane. Future generations can view the portrayal of this Gothic king, who Sidonius closely observed during peaceful and social times, without fear. In a letter from the court of Toulouse, the orator satisfies a friend's curiosity with this description: "Theodoric's impressive appearance commands the respect of those unaware of his abilities, and although he was born a prince, his qualities would dignify any position. He has a medium build; his body looks more plump than fat, and his limbs are well-proportioned, showcasing a combination of agility and strength. If you look at his face, you'll see a high forehead, large bushy eyebrows, a prominent nose, thin lips, a neat set of white teeth, and a fair complexion that flushes more from modesty than anger. His typical daily routine, as much as the public can see, can be summarized briefly. Before dawn, he heads to his private chapel with a small entourage, where an Arian clergy performs the service. However, those who try to interpret his true feelings see this devoted ritual as a matter of habit and strategy. The rest of the morning is spent managing his kingdom. His chair is surrounded by military officers of good appearance and demeanor: the loud crowd of his Barbarian guards fills the audience hall but is kept from entering the veils that hide the council chamber from common view. The ambassadors of various nations are introduced one by one: Theodoric listens attentively, replies briefly and wisely, and either makes a final decision or postpones it based on their matters. Around eight o'clock, he leaves his throne to visit either his treasury or stables. If he decides to go hunting or at least ride, his bow is carried by a favored young man; but when he spots game, he uses his own hand to draw it and rarely misses his target: as a king, he looks down on using weapons in such lowly pursuits, but as a soldier, he would feel embarrassed to accept any military task he could do himself. On regular days, his dinner resembles that of an ordinary citizen, but every Saturday, he invites many distinguished guests to his royal table, which is served with the elegance of Greece, the abundance of Gaul, and the organization and attentiveness of Italy. The gold or silver plates are more notable for their brilliance and exquisite craftsmanship rather than their weight; the meal pleases the palate without relying on expensive foreign luxuries; the size and number of wine cups are strictly guided by temperance laws; and the respectful silence is only broken by serious and enlightening conversation. After dinner, Theodoric sometimes enjoys a quick nap; as soon as he wakes up, he asks for the dice and board games, encourages his friends to forget about royal dignity, and enjoys their open expressions of the emotions sparked by the game. In this game, which he loves as a reflection of war, he alternates between showing eagerness, skill, patience, and a cheerful spirit. If he loses, he laughs; if he wins, he remains humble and quiet. Yet, despite this apparent indifference, his courtiers prefer to request favors during his winning moments; I myself have sometimes benefited from my losses when applying to the king. Around three o'clock, business picks up again and continues non-stop until after sunset, when a signal for the royal supper sends the tired crowd of petitioners away. At supper, which has a more casual feel, jesters and performers are sometimes brought in to entertain, but not to offend, the guests with their silly humor: however, female singers and soft, delicate music are strictly excluded, as only martial tunes that inspire valor please Theodoric's ears. He then leaves the table; and the nighttime guards are immediately stationed at the entrances of the treasury, palace, and private quarters."
When the king of the Visigoths encouraged Avitus to assume the purple, he offered his person and his forces, as a faithful soldier of the republic. The exploits of Theodoric soon convinced the world that he had not degenerated from the warlike virtues of his ancestors. After the establishment of the Goths in Aquitain, and the passage of the Vandals into Africa, the Suevi, who had fixed their kingdom in Gallicia, aspired to the conquest of Spain, and threatened to extinguish the feeble remains of the Roman dominion. The provincials of Carthagena and Tarragona, afflicted by a hostile invasion, represented their injuries and their apprehensions. Count Fronto was despatched, in the name of the emperor Avitus, with advantageous offers of peace and alliance; and Theodoric interposed his weighty mediation, to declare, that, unless his brother-in-law, the king of the Suevi, immediately retired, he should be obliged to arm in the cause of justice and of Rome. "Tell him," replied the haughty Rechiarius, "that I despise his friendship and his arms; but that I shall soon try whether he will dare to expect my arrival under the walls of Thoulouse." Such a challenge urged Theodoric to prevent the bold designs of his enemy; he passed the Pyrenees at the head of the Visigoths: the Franks and Burgundians served under his standard; and though he professed himself the dutiful servant of Avitus, he privately stipulated, for himself and his successors, the absolute possession of his Spanish conquests. The two armies, or rather the two nations, encountered each other on the banks of the River Urbicus, about twelve miles from Astorga; and the decisive victory of the Goths appeared for a while to have extirpated the name and kingdom of the Suevi. From the field of battle Theodoric advanced to Braga, their metropolis, which still retained the splendid vestiges of its ancient commerce and dignity. His entrance was not polluted with blood; and the Goths respected the chastity of their female captives, more especially of the consecrated virgins: but the greatest part of the clergy and people were made slaves, and even the churches and altars were confounded in the universal pillage. The unfortunate king of the Suevi had escaped to one of the ports of the ocean; but the obstinacy of the winds opposed his flight: he was delivered to his implacable rival; and Rechiarius, who neither desired nor expected mercy, received, with manly constancy, the death which he would probably have inflicted. After this bloody sacrifice to policy or resentment, Theodoric carried his victorious arms as far as Merida, the principal town of Lusitania, without meeting any resistance, except from the miraculous powers of St. Eulalia; but he was stopped in the full career of success, and recalled from Spain before he could provide for the security of his conquests. In his retreat towards the Pyrenees, he revenged his disappointment on the country through which he passed; and, in the sack of Pollentia and Astorga, he showed himself a faithless ally, as well as a cruel enemy. Whilst the king of the Visigoths fought and vanquished in the name of Avitus, the reign of Avitus had expired; and both the honor and the interest of Theodoric were deeply wounded by the disgrace of a friend, whom he had seated on the throne of the Western empire.
When the king of the Visigoths urged Avitus to take the throne, he pledged his support and his forces, as a loyal soldier of the republic. The actions of Theodoric quickly proved to everyone that he hadn’t lost the military prowess of his forebears. After the Goths settled in Aquitaine and the Vandals moved into Africa, the Suevi, who established their kingdom in Galicia, aimed to conquer Spain and threatened to wipe out the weakened remnants of Roman rule. The people of Carthagena and Tarragona, suffering from a hostile invasion, reported their injuries and fears. Count Fronto was sent, on behalf of Emperor Avitus, with promising offers of peace and alliance; and Theodoric used his influence to declare that unless his brother-in-law, the king of the Suevi, withdrew immediately, he would have to take up arms for justice and Rome. "Tell him," replied the proud Rechiarius, "that I scorn his friendship and his army; but I will soon see if he dares to expect my arrival at the walls of Toulouse." This bold challenge spurred Theodoric to thwart the ambitious plans of his enemy; he crossed the Pyrenees at the head of the Visigoths, with the Franks and Burgundians serving under his banner; and although he claimed to be Avitus’s loyal subject, he secretly arranged for himself and his successors to have complete control over his conquests in Spain. The two armies, or rather the two nations, faced off on the banks of the River Urbicus, about twelve miles from Astorga; and the decisive victory of the Goths seemed to erase the name and kingdom of the Suevi for good. After the battle, Theodoric moved on to Braga, their capital, which still showed signs of its former trade and prominence. His entry was not stained with blood; the Goths honored the purity of their female captives, especially the consecrated virgins: however, most of the clergy and residents were enslaved, and even the churches and altars were caught up in the widespread looting. The unfortunate king of the Suevi had fled to one of the ocean ports; but the stubborn winds thwarted his escape. He was captured by his relentless rival; and Rechiarius, who neither sought nor expected mercy, faced his death with stoic bravery, the kind he would likely have imposed on others. After this grim sacrifice made for political gain or revenge, Theodoric led his victorious troops as far as Merida, the main city of Lusitania, without facing any opposition, aside from the miraculous intervention of St. Eulalia; but he was halted in the midst of his success and was called back from Spain before he could secure his conquests. On his retreat toward the Pyrenees, he took out his frustration on the lands he passed through; and in the looting of Pollentia and Astorga, he revealed himself as both a treacherous ally and a ruthless enemy. While the king of the Visigoths fought and triumphed on behalf of Avitus, Avitus’s reign had come to an end; and both the honor and interests of Theodoric were deeply hurt by the disgrace of a friend whom he had elevated to the throne of the Western Empire.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part II.
The pressing solicitations of the senate and people persuaded the emperor Avitus to fix his residence at Rome, and to accept the consulship for the ensuing year. On the first day of January, his son-in-law, Sidonius Apollinaris, celebrated his praises in a panegyric of six hundred verses; but this composition, though it was rewarded with a brass statue, seems to contain a very moderate proportion, either of genius or of truth. The poet, if we may degrade that sacred name, exaggerates the merit of a sovereign and a father; and his prophecy of a long and glorious reign was soon contradicted by the event. Avitus, at a time when the Imperial dignity was reduced to a preeminence of toil and danger, indulged himself in the pleasures of Italian luxury: age had not extinguished his amorous inclinations; and he is accused of insulting, with indiscreet and ungenerous raillery, the husbands whose wives he had seduced or violated. But the Romans were not inclined either to excuse his faults or to acknowledge his virtues. The several parts of the empire became every day more alienated from each other; and the stranger of Gaul was the object of popular hatred and contempt. The senate asserted their legitimate claim in the election of an emperor; and their authority, which had been originally derived from the old constitution, was again fortified by the actual weakness of a declining monarchy. Yet even such a monarchy might have resisted the votes of an unarmed senate, if their discontent had not been supported, or perhaps inflamed, by the Count Ricimer, one of the principal commanders of the Barbarian troops, who formed the military defence of Italy. The daughter of Wallia, king of the Visigoths, was the mother of Ricimer; but he was descended, on the father's side, from the nation of the Suevi; his pride or patriotism might be exasperated by the misfortunes of his countrymen; and he obeyed, with reluctance, an emperor in whose elevation he had not been consulted. His faithful and important services against the common enemy rendered him still more formidable; and, after destroying on the coast of Corsica a fleet of Vandals, which consisted of sixty galleys, Ricimer returned in triumph with the appellation of the Deliverer of Italy. He chose that moment to signify to Avitus, that his reign was at an end; and the feeble emperor, at a distance from his Gothic allies, was compelled, after a short and unavailing struggle to abdicate the purple. By the clemency, however, or the contempt, of Ricimer, he was permitted to descend from the throne to the more desirable station of bishop of Placentia: but the resentment of the senate was still unsatisfied; and their inflexible severity pronounced the sentence of his death He fled towards the Alps, with the humble hope, not of arming the Visigoths in his cause, but of securing his person and treasures in the sanctuary of Julian, one of the tutelar saints of Auvergne. Disease, or the hand of the executioner, arrested him on the road; yet his remains were decently transported to Brivas, or Brioude, in his native province, and he reposed at the feet of his holy patron. Avitus left only one daughter, the wife of Sidonius Apollinaris, who inherited the patrimony of his father-in-law; lamenting, at the same time, the disappointment of his public and private expectations. His resentment prompted him to join, or at least to countenance, the measures of a rebellious faction in Gaul; and the poet had contracted some guilt, which it was incumbent on him to expiate, by a new tribute of flattery to the succeeding emperor.
The urgent requests from the Senate and the people convinced Emperor Avitus to make Rome his home and take on the consulship for the upcoming year. On January 1st, his son-in-law, Sidonius Apollinaris, praised him in a panegyric of six hundred verses; however, this work, despite earning a bronze statue, seems to contain only a bit of talent and truth. The poet, if we can lower that honorable title, inflates the achievements of the emperor and father, and his prediction of a long and glorious reign was soon proven wrong. While the Imperial position had become one of hardship and danger, Avitus indulged in the luxuries of Italy: age hadn’t dampened his romantic pursuits, and he was accused of mockingly taunting the husbands of the women he had seduced or assaulted. However, the Romans were not inclined to forgive his faults or recognize his virtues. The different regions of the empire grew increasingly distant from each other, and the outsider from Gaul became the target of public anger and scorn. The Senate asserted their rightful role in electing an emperor, and their authority, originally founded on the old constitution, was bolstered by the actual weakness of a crumbling monarchy. Still, such a monarchy could have resisted the votes of an unarmed Senate, had their discontent not been supported, or perhaps fueled, by Count Ricimer, one of the main commanders of the Barbarian troops that formed Italy’s military defense. Ricimer was the son of Wallia, king of the Visigoths, on his mother’s side, and a descendant of the Suevi on his father’s. His pride or sense of nationalism might have been inflamed by his countrymen's misfortunes, and he served an emperor whose rise he had not been consulted about, grudgingly. His loyal and significant contributions against the common enemy made him an even more daunting figure, and after destroying a fleet of Vandals off the coast of Corsica, consisting of sixty ships, Ricimer returned triumphantly with the title of Deliverer of Italy. He seized that moment to inform Avitus that his reign was over, and the weak emperor, separated from his Gothic allies, was forced to abdicate the throne after a brief and futile struggle. However, due to Ricimer's mercy or disdain, he was allowed to step down to the more preferable role of bishop of Placentia. Still, the Senate's anger was not appeased, and their harsh determination pronounced a sentence of death upon him. He fled towards the Alps with the humble hope of not raising Visigoth arms for his cause but rather securing himself and his treasures in the sanctuary of Julian, one of Auvergne’s protective saints. Illness, or the executioner's blade, caught up with him on the way; yet, his body was respectfully transported to Brivas, or Brioude, in his home province, where he was laid to rest at the feet of his holy patron. Avitus left behind only one daughter, the wife of Sidonius Apollinaris, who inherited her father’s estate while also mourning his unfulfilled public and private hopes. His bitterness drove him to join or at least support a rebellious faction in Gaul, and the poet found himself in some trouble that he needed to make amends for with new flattery directed at the next emperor.
The successor of Avitus presents the welcome discovery of a great and heroic character, such as sometimes arise, in a degenerate age, to vindicate the honor of the human species. The emperor Majorian has deserved the praises of his contemporaries, and of posterity; and these praises may be strongly expressed in the words of a judicious and disinterested historian: "That he was gentle to his subjects; that he was terrible to his enemies; and that he excelled, in every virtue, all his predecessors who had reigned over the Romans." Such a testimony may justify at least the panegyric of Sidonius; and we may acquiesce in the assurance, that, although the obsequious orator would have flattered, with equal zeal, the most worthless of princes, the extraordinary merit of his object confined him, on this occasion, within the bounds of truth. Majorian derived his name from his maternal grandfather, who, in the reign of the great Theodosius, had commanded the troops of the Illyrian frontier. He gave his daughter in marriage to the father of Majorian, a respectable officer, who administered the revenues of Gaul with skill and integrity; and generously preferred the friendship of Ætius to the tempting offer of an insidious court. His son, the future emperor, who was educated in the profession of arms, displayed, from his early youth, intrepid courage, premature wisdom, and unbounded liberality in a scanty fortune. He followed the standard of Ætius, contributed to his success, shared, and sometimes eclipsed, his glory, and at last excited the jealousy of the patrician, or rather of his wife, who forced him to retire from the service. Majorian, after the death of Ætius, was recalled and promoted; and his intimate connection with Count Ricimer was the immediate step by which he ascended the throne of the Western empire. During the vacancy that succeeded the abdication of Avitus, the ambitious Barbarian, whose birth excluded him from the Imperial dignity, governed Italy with the title of Patrician; resigned to his friend the conspicuous station of master-general of the cavalry and infantry; and, after an interval of some months, consented to the unanimous wish of the Romans, whose favor Majorian had solicited by a recent victory over the Alemanni. He was invested with the purple at Ravenna: and the epistle which he addressed to the senate, will best describe his situation and his sentiments. "Your election, Conscript Fathers! and the ordinance of the most valiant army, have made me your emperor. May the propitious Deity direct and prosper the counsels and events of my administration, to your advantage and to the public welfare! For my own part, I did not aspire, I have submitted to reign; nor should I have discharged the obligations of a citizen if I had refused, with base and selfish ingratitude, to support the weight of those labors, which were imposed by the republic. Assist, therefore, the prince whom you have made; partake the duties which you have enjoined; and may our common endeavors promote the happiness of an empire, which I have accepted from your hands. Be assured, that, in our times, justice shall resume her ancient vigor, and that virtue shall become, not only innocent, but meritorious. Let none, except the authors themselves, be apprehensive of delations, which, as a subject, I have always condemned, and, as a prince, will severely punish. Our own vigilance, and that of our father, the patrician Ricimer, shall regulate all military affairs, and provide for the safety of the Roman world, which we have saved from foreign and domestic enemies. You now understand the maxims of my government; you may confide in the faithful love and sincere assurances of a prince who has formerly been the companion of your life and dangers; who still glories in the name of senator, and who is anxious that you should never repent the judgment which you have pronounced in his favor." The emperor, who, amidst the ruins of the Roman world, revived the ancient language of law and liberty, which Trajan would not have disclaimed, must have derived those generous sentiments from his own heart; since they were not suggested to his imitation by the customs of his age, or the example of his predecessors.
The successor of Avitus highlights the welcome emergence of a remarkable and heroic figure, someone who occasionally appears in a declining era to restore the honor of humanity. Emperor Majorian has earned the admiration of his contemporaries and future generations; this praise can be aptly conveyed by a wise and impartial historian: "He was kind to his subjects, fierce to his enemies, and surpassed all his predecessors who ruled over the Romans in every virtue." This acknowledgment can at least validate Sidonius's praise; and we can accept the assurance that, although the flattering orator might have praised even the most undeserving of rulers, the exceptional quality of Majorian kept him truthful in this instance. Majorian got his name from his maternal grandfather, who commanded the Illyrian frontier troops during the reign of the great Theodosius. He married his daughter to Majorian's father, a respected officer who managed Gaul's revenues skillfully and honestly, choosing to prioritize his friendship with Ætius over the enticing but treacherous offers of the court. The future emperor, raised in a military environment, showed, from a young age, courageous bravery, early wisdom, and boundless generosity despite modest means. He served under Ætius, contributed to his success, shared and sometimes overshadowed his glory, and eventually stirred the jealousy of the patrician, or rather his wife, who compelled him to leave military service. After Ætius's death, Majorian was recalled and elevated, and his close ties with Count Ricimer were the key to his rise to the Western Empire’s throne. During the vacancy that followed Avitus's abdication, the ambitious Barbarian, whose background barred him from the Imperial title, ruled Italy as Patrician; he handed over the prominent position of master-general of the cavalry and infantry to his friend and, after a few months, agreed to the unanimous desire of the Romans, whom Majorian had won over with a recent victory over the Alemanni. He was crowned in Ravenna, and the letter he sent to the Senate best outlines his situation and feelings: "Your election, Conscript Fathers! and the endorsement of the most valiant army have made me your emperor. May the favorable Deity guide and prosper the decisions and outcomes of my rule for your benefit and the public good! For my part, I did not seek this position; I accepted the responsibility of reigning, nor would I fulfill my duties as a citizen if I had refused, with shameful selfishness, to bear the burdens placed on me by the republic. Therefore, support the ruler you have chosen; share in the responsibilities you have assigned; and may our collective efforts enhance the happiness of an empire that I have accepted from your hands. Rest assured that, during my time, justice will regain its former strength, and virtue will be recognized as not just innocent but also commendable. Let no one, except for the wrongdoers themselves, fear delations, which I have always condemned as a subject and will harshly punish as a prince. Our vigilance, alongside that of our father, Patrician Ricimer, will oversee all military matters and ensure the safety of the Roman world, which we have defended against both foreign and domestic threats. You now know the principles of my governance; trust in the loyal commitment and sincere promises of a prince who has previously shared your life and trials, who still takes pride in being a senator, and who hopes you will never regret your choice in his favor." The emperor, who, amidst the remnants of the Roman world, revived the ancient language of law and freedom that Trajan would have embraced, must have drawn those noble sentiments from his own spirit since they were not inspired by the customs of his time or the examples of his predecessors.
The private and public actions of Majorian are very imperfectly known: but his laws, remarkable for an original cast of thought and expression, faithfully represent the character of a sovereign who loved his people, who sympathized in their distress, who had studied the causes of the decline of the empire, and who was capable of applying (as far as such reformation was practicable) judicious and effectual remedies to the public disorders. His regulations concerning the finances manifestly tended to remove, or at least to mitigate, the most intolerable grievances. I. From the first hour of his reign, he was solicitous (I translate his own words) to relieve the weary fortunes of the provincials, oppressed by the accumulated weight of indictions and superindictions. With this view he granted a universal amnesty, a final and absolute discharge of all arrears of tribute, of all debts, which, under any pretence, the fiscal officers might demand from the people. This wise dereliction of obsolete, vexatious, and unprofitable claims, improved and purified the sources of the public revenue; and the subject who could now look back without despair, might labor with hope and gratitude for himself and for his country. II. In the assessment and collection of taxes, Majorian restored the ordinary jurisdiction of the provincial magistrates; and suppressed the extraordinary commissions which had been introduced, in the name of the emperor himself, or of the Prætorian præfects. The favorite servants, who obtained such irregular powers, were insolent in their behavior, and arbitrary in their demands: they affected to despise the subordinate tribunals, and they were discontented, if their fees and profits did not twice exceed the sum which they condescended to pay into the treasury. One instance of their extortion would appear incredible, were it not authenticated by the legislator himself. They exacted the whole payment in gold: but they refused the current coin of the empire, and would accept only such ancient pieces as were stamped with the names of Faustina or the Antonines. The subject, who was unprovided with these curious medals, had recourse to the expedient of compounding with their rapacious demands; or if he succeeded in the research, his imposition was doubled, according to the weight and value of the money of former times. III. "The municipal corporations, (says the emperor,) the lesser senates, (so antiquity has justly styled them,) deserve to be considered as the heart of the cities, and the sinews of the republic. And yet so low are they now reduced, by the injustice of magistrates and the venality of collectors, that many of their members, renouncing their dignity and their country, have taken refuge in distant and obscure exile." He urges, and even compels, their return to their respective cities; but he removes the grievance which had forced them to desert the exercise of their municipal functions. They are directed, under the authority of the provincial magistrates, to resume their office of levying the tribute; but, instead of being made responsible for the whole sum assessed on their district, they are only required to produce a regular account of the payments which they have actually received, and of the defaulters who are still indebted to the public. IV. But Majorian was not ignorant that these corporate bodies were too much inclined to retaliate the injustice and oppression which they had suffered; and he therefore revives the useful office of the defenders of cities. He exhorts the people to elect, in a full and free assembly, some man of discretion and integrity, who would dare to assert their privileges, to represent their grievances, to protect the poor from the tyranny of the rich, and to inform the emperor of the abuses that were committed under the sanction of his name and authority.
The private and public actions of Majorian are not very well-known, but his laws, notable for their unique ideas and phrasing, accurately reflect the nature of a ruler who truly cared for his people, empathized with their struggles, understood the reasons behind the empire's decline, and was capable of implementing effective reforms as much as possible. His financial regulations clearly aimed to remove or at least ease the most severe grievances. I. From the very start of his reign, he was eager (I quote his own words) to relieve the weary fortunes of the provincials, who were weighed down by excessive taxes and obligations. To this end, he announced a universal pardon, a complete and final cancellation of all overdue taxes and debts that the tax officials might claim from the people. This wise abandonment of outdated, burdensome, and unproductive claims improved and clarified the sources of public revenue. The citizens who could now look back without despair were able to work with hope and gratitude for themselves and their country. II. When it came to tax assessment and collection, Majorian restored the normal authority of the provincial magistrates and abolished the extraordinary commissions that had been set up in the name of the emperor or the Prætorian prefects. The favored agents who held these irregular powers acted arrogantly and made unreasonable demands; they showed contempt for lesser courts and were dissatisfied unless their fees and profits were at least twice what they reported paying into the treasury. One example of their extortion would seem unbelievable if it weren't confirmed by the legislator himself. They demanded payment exclusively in gold, refusing the standard currency of the empire and only accepting ancient coins stamped with the names of Faustina or the Antonines. A citizen without these rare coins had to negotiate with their greedy demands; or if they managed to find these coins, they were charged double based on the weight and value of past currency. III. "The municipal corporations," the emperor states, "the lesser senates (as antiquity rightly refers to them), are the heart of the cities and the backbone of the republic. Yet, they are now so diminished by the unfairness of magistrates and the corruption of collectors that many of their members have abandoned their dignity and homeland for distant and obscure exile." He encourages and even forces them to return to their cities but addresses the issues that pushed them away from their municipal roles. They are instructed, under the authority of the provincial magistrates, to take back their responsibility of tax collection; but instead of being held accountable for the total amount assessed on their district, they are only required to provide an accurate account of the payments they have actually received and of those who still owe money to the public. IV. However, Majorian was aware that these corporate groups were likely to retaliate against the injustice and oppression they had faced; therefore, he revived the important role of the defenders of cities. He urged the community to elect, in a fully open assembly, someone wise and honest who would stand up for their rights, voice their complaints, defend the poor from the wealthy's tyranny, and inform the emperor about the abuses happening under his name and authority.
The spectator who casts a mournful view over the ruins of ancient Rome, is tempted to accuse the memory of the Goths and Vandals, for the mischief which they had neither leisure, nor power, nor perhaps inclination, to perpetrate. The tempest of war might strike some lofty turrets to the ground; but the destruction which undermined the foundations of those massy fabrics was prosecuted, slowly and silently, during a period of ten centuries; and the motives of interest, that afterwards operated without shame or control, were severely checked by the taste and spirit of the emperor Majorian. The decay of the city had gradually impaired the value of the public works. The circus and theatres might still excite, but they seldom gratified, the desires of the people: the temples, which had escaped the zeal of the Christians, were no longer inhabited, either by gods or men; the diminished crowds of the Romans were lost in the immense space of their baths and porticos; and the stately libraries and halls of justice became useless to an indolent generation, whose repose was seldom disturbed, either by study or business. The monuments of consular, or Imperial, greatness were no longer revered, as the immortal glory of the capital: they were only esteemed as an inexhaustible mine of materials, cheaper, and more convenient than the distant quarry. Specious petitions were continually addressed to the easy magistrates of Rome, which stated the want of stones or bricks, for some necessary service: the fairest forms of architecture were rudely defaced, for the sake of some paltry, or pretended, repairs; and the degenerate Romans, who converted the spoil to their own emolument, demolished, with sacrilegious hands, the labors of their ancestors. Majorian, who had often sighed over the desolation of the city, applied a severe remedy to the growing evil. He reserved to the prince and senate the sole cognizance of the extreme cases which might justify the destruction of an ancient edifice; imposed a fine of fifty pounds of gold (two thousand pounds sterling) on every magistrate who should presume to grant such illegal and scandalous license, and threatened to chastise the criminal obedience of their subordinate officers, by a severe whipping, and the amputation of both their hands. In the last instance, the legislator might seem to forget the proportion of guilt and punishment; but his zeal arose from a generous principle, and Majorian was anxious to protect the monuments of those ages, in which he would have desired and deserved to live. The emperor conceived, that it was his interest to increase the number of his subjects; and that it was his duty to guard the purity of the marriage-bed: but the means which he employed to accomplish these salutary purposes are of an ambiguous, and perhaps exceptionable, kind. The pious maids, who consecrated their virginity to Christ, were restrained from taking the veil till they had reached their fortieth year. Widows under that age were compelled to form a second alliance within the term of five years, by the forfeiture of half their wealth to their nearest relations, or to the state. Unequal marriages were condemned or annulled. The punishment of confiscation and exile was deemed so inadequate to the guilt of adultery, that, if the criminal returned to Italy, he might, by the express declaration of Majorian, be slain with impunity.
The person looking sadly at the ruins of ancient Rome might be tempted to blame the Goths and Vandals for the destruction they didn’t really have the time, power, or maybe even desire to cause. While the storms of war might knock down some tall towers, the real damage that weakened the foundations of those massive buildings happened slowly and quietly over a span of ten centuries. The interests that later acted without shame or restraint were kept in check by the taste and spirit of Emperor Majorian. As the city decayed, the value of public works diminished. The circus and theaters could still attract attention, but they rarely satisfied the people's desires. The temples that escaped the Christians’ fervor were no longer home to gods or people. The fewer Romans left wandered aimlessly in the vast spaces of their baths and porticoes, while the grand libraries and courts became useless to a lazy generation, whose peace was rarely interrupted by study or work. The monuments of consular or imperial greatness lost their reverence as symbols of the capital’s glory; instead, they were seen as a treasure trove of materials, cheaper and easier to obtain than distant quarries. Nice petitions were constantly sent to the lenient magistrates of Rome, claiming a need for stones or bricks for some necessary project. Beautiful architectural forms were crudely defaced for petty or fake repairs, and the corrupt Romans turned the remains into personal gain, tearing down their ancestors’ efforts with sacrilegious hands. Majorian, who often sighed over the city’s ruin, applied strict measures to address the growing problem. He reserved the right for the prince and senate to be the only ones who could decide on extreme cases that would justify destroying an ancient building; he imposed a fine of fifty pounds of gold (two thousand pounds sterling) on any magistrate who dared to grant such illegal and scandalous permission, and threatened to punish their subordinate officers severely, by whipping and even cutting off both their hands. While the legislator might seem to overlook the balance between guilt and punishment in this last instance, his zeal came from a noble principle, and Majorian wanted to protect the monuments of eras he would have both desired and deserved to live in. The emperor believed it was in his interest to increase his subjects and felt responsible for maintaining the sanctity of marriage. However, the methods he used to achieve these goals were questionable and potentially problematic. Pious women who dedicated their virginity to Christ were prevented from taking the veil until they were forty years old. Widows younger than that were forced to remarry within five years, or they would lose half their wealth to their closest relatives or the state. Unequal marriages were either condemned or annulled. The punishment of confiscation and exile was considered too lenient for adultery, so if the offender returned to Italy, as Majorian expressly stated, they could be killed without penalty.
While the emperor Majorian assiduously labored to restore the happiness and virtue of the Romans, he encountered the arms of Genseric, from his character and situation their most formidable enemy. A fleet of Vandals and Moors landed at the mouth of the Liris, or Garigliano; but the Imperial troops surprised and attacked the disorderly Barbarians, who were encumbered with the spoils of Campania; they were chased with slaughter to their ships, and their leader, the king's brother-in-law, was found in the number of the slain. Such vigilance might announce the character of the new reign; but the strictest vigilance, and the most numerous forces, were insufficient to protect the long-extended coast of Italy from the depredations of a naval war. The public opinion had imposed a nobler and more arduous task on the genius of Majorian. Rome expected from him alone the restitution of Africa; and the design, which he formed, of attacking the Vandals in their new settlements, was the result of bold and judicious policy. If the intrepid emperor could have infused his own spirit into the youth of Italy; if he could have revived in the field of Mars, the manly exercises in which he had always surpassed his equals; he might have marched against Genseric at the head of a Roman army. Such a reformation of national manners might be embraced by the rising generation; but it is the misfortune of those princes who laboriously sustain a declining monarchy, that, to obtain some immediate advantage, or to avert some impending danger, they are forced to countenance, and even to multiply, the most pernicious abuses. Majorian, like the weakest of his predecessors, was reduced to the disgraceful expedient of substituting Barbarian auxiliaries in the place of his unwarlike subjects: and his superior abilities could only be displayed in the vigor and dexterity with which he wielded a dangerous instrument, so apt to recoil on the hand that used it. Besides the confederates, who were already engaged in the service of the empire, the fame of his liberality and valor attracted the nations of the Danube, the Borysthenes, and perhaps of the Tanais. Many thousands of the bravest subjects of Attila, the Gepidæ, the Ostrogoths, the Rugians, the Burgundians, the Suevi, the Alani, assembled in the plains of Liguria; and their formidable strength was balanced by their mutual animosities. They passed the Alps in a severe winter. The emperor led the way, on foot, and in complete armor; sounding, with his long staff, the depth of the ice, or snow, and encouraging the Scythians, who complained of the extreme cold, by the cheerful assurance, that they should be satisfied with the heat of Africa. The citizens of Lyons had presumed to shut their gates; they soon implored, and experienced, the clemency of Majorian. He vanquished Theodoric in the field; and admitted to his friendship and alliance a king whom he had found not unworthy of his arms. The beneficial, though precarious, reunion of the greater part of Gaul and Spain, was the effect of persuasion, as well as of force; and the independent Bagaudæ, who had escaped, or resisted, the oppression, of former reigns, were disposed to confide in the virtues of Majorian. His camp was filled with Barbarian allies; his throne was supported by the zeal of an affectionate people; but the emperor had foreseen, that it was impossible, without a maritime power, to achieve the conquest of Africa. In the first Punic war, the republic had exerted such incredible diligence, that, within sixty days after the first stroke of the axe had been given in the forest, a fleet of one hundred and sixty galleys proudly rode at anchor in the sea. Under circumstances much less favorable, Majorian equalled the spirit and perseverance of the ancient Romans. The woods of the Apennine were felled; the arsenals and manufactures of Ravenna and Misenum were restored; Italy and Gaul vied with each other in liberal contributions to the public service; and the Imperial navy of three hundred large galleys, with an adequate proportion of transports and smaller vessels, was collected in the secure and capacious harbor of Carthagena in Spain. The intrepid countenance of Majorian animated his troops with a confidence of victory; and, if we might credit the historian Procopius, his courage sometimes hurried him beyond the bounds of prudence. Anxious to explore, with his own eyes, the state of the Vandals, he ventured, after disguising the color of his hair, to visit Carthage, in the character of his own ambassador: and Genseric was afterwards mortified by the discovery, that he had entertained and dismissed the emperor of the Romans. Such an anecdote may be rejected as an improbable fiction; but it is a fiction which would not have been imagined, unless in the life of a hero.
While Emperor Majorian worked tirelessly to bring back the happiness and virtue of the Romans, he faced the formidable enemy Genseric. A fleet of Vandals and Moors landed near the mouth of the Liris, or Garigliano; however, the Imperial troops surprised and attacked the disorganized Barbarians, who were weighed down with spoils from Campania. They were chased back to their ships, and their leader, the king's brother-in-law, was among those killed. This vigilance hinted at the character of the new reign, but no amount of vigilance or forces could protect Italy’s long coast from the ravages of naval warfare. Public expectation had set a higher and tougher challenge for Majorian. Rome anticipated that only he could restore Africa; his plan to assault the Vandals in their new territories was bold and wise. If the fearless emperor could have instilled his spirit into the youth of Italy; if he could have revived the manly exercises in which he always excelled on the field of Mars, he could have marched against Genseric at the head of a Roman army. Such a revival of national values might have been embraced by the emerging generation; however, it’s unfortunate for those rulers who struggle to maintain a declining monarchy that to achieve immediate gains or avert looming dangers, they often have to accept and even increase the most harmful abuses. Majorian, like the weakest of his predecessors, was forced to rely on dishonorable tactics by enlisting Barbarian auxiliaries instead of his untrained subjects; his superior skills were only shown in how effectively he managed this dangerous strategy, which could easily turn back on him. In addition to the allies already serving the empire, his reputation for generosity and bravery attracted tribes from the Danube, Borysthenes, and possibly the Tanais. Many thousands of Attila’s bravest followers, including the Gepidæ, Ostrogoths, Rugians, Burgundians, Suevi, and Alani, gathered in the plains of Liguria; their great strength was balanced by their internal rivalries. They crossed the Alps during a harsh winter. The emperor led the charge on foot in full armor, testing the depth of the ice or snow with his long staff, encouraging the Scythians, who complained about the freezing temperatures, that they would soon enjoy the warmth of Africa. The citizens of Lyons had dared to close their gates; they quickly sought and received Majorian's mercy. He defeated Theodoric in battle and welcomed into his friendship and alliance a king he found worthy of his arms. The beneficial but unstable reunification of most of Gaul and Spain resulted from both persuasion and force; the independent Bagaudæ, who had either escaped or resisted past oppression, were inclined to trust in Majorian's virtues. His camp was filled with Barbarian allies; his throne was backed by the enthusiasm of a devoted people; but Majorian realized it was impossible to conquer Africa without a naval power. During the first Punic war, the republic had worked so diligently that within sixty days after the first cut of the axe in the forest, a fleet of one hundred and sixty galleys was proudly anchored in the sea. Under even less favorable conditions, Majorian matched the spirit and perseverance of the ancient Romans. The forests of the Apennines were cleared; the shipyards and workshops of Ravenna and Misenum were restored; Italy and Gaul competed in generous contributions to the public service; and the Imperial navy of three hundred large galleys, along with a sufficient number of transports and smaller vessels, was assembled in the safe and spacious harbor of Carthagena in Spain. Majorian's fearless demeanor inspired his troops with confidence in victory; and if we are to believe the historian Procopius, his bravery sometimes led him beyond what was sensible. Eager to see the Vandals' situation for himself, he disguised his hair color and visited Carthage as his own ambassador, and Genseric was later embarrassed to learn that he had hosted and let go of the emperor of the Romans. Such a story might be dismissed as unlikely fiction, but it is a tale that would only arise in the life of a hero.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part III.
Without the help of a personal interview, Genseric was sufficiently acquainted with the genius and designs of his adversary. He practiced his customary arts of fraud and delay, but he practiced them without success. His applications for peace became each hour more submissive, and perhaps more sincere; but the inflexible Majorian had adopted the ancient maxim, that Rome could not be safe, as long as Carthage existed in a hostile state. The king of the Vandals distrusted the valor of his native subjects, who were enervated by the luxury of the South; he suspected the fidelity of the vanquished people, who abhorred him as an Arian tyrant; and the desperate measure, which he executed, of reducing Mauritania into a desert, could not defeat the operations of the Roman emperor, who was at liberty to land his troops on any part of the African coast. But Genseric was saved from impending and inevitable ruin by the treachery of some powerful subjects, envious, or apprehensive, of their master's success. Guided by their secret intelligence, he surprised the unguarded fleet in the Bay of Carthagena: many of the ships were sunk, or taken, or burnt; and the preparations of three years were destroyed in a single day. After this event, the behavior of the two antagonists showed them superior to their fortune. The Vandal, instead of being elated by this accidental victory, immediately renewed his solicitations for peace. The emperor of the West, who was capable of forming great designs, and of supporting heavy disappointments, consented to a treaty, or rather to a suspension of arms; in the full assurance that, before he could restore his navy, he should be supplied with provocations to justify a second war. Majorian returned to Italy, to prosecute his labors for the public happiness; and, as he was conscious of his own integrity, he might long remain ignorant of the dark conspiracy which threatened his throne and his life. The recent misfortune of Carthagena sullied the glory which had dazzled the eyes of the multitude; almost every description of civil and military officers were exasperated against the Reformer, since they all derived some advantage from the abuses which he endeavored to suppress; and the patrician Ricimer impelled the inconstant passions of the Barbarians against a prince whom he esteemed and hated. The virtues of Majorian could not protect him from the impetuous sedition, which broke out in the camp near Tortona, at the foot of the Alps. He was compelled to abdicate the Imperial purple: five days after his abdication, it was reported that he died of a dysentery; and the humble tomb, which covered his remains, was consecrated by the respect and gratitude of succeeding generations. The private character of Majorian inspired love and respect. Malicious calumny and satire excited his indignation, or, if he himself were the object, his contempt; but he protected the freedom of wit, and, in the hours which the emperor gave to the familiar society of his friends, he could indulge his taste for pleasantry, without degrading the majesty of his rank.
Without the need for a personal interview, Genseric was well aware of the strengths and plans of his opponent. He resorted to his usual tactics of deceit and delay, but they didn’t work this time. His requests for peace became increasingly submissive, and maybe even more genuine; however, the unyielding Majorian held on to the old belief that Rome couldn't be safe as long as Carthage remained a threat. The king of the Vandals doubted the bravery of his own people, who had become soft from the luxuries of the South; he also questioned the loyalty of the defeated, who loathed him as an Arian tyrant. The extreme action he took—turning Mauritania into a wasteland—couldn't stop the Roman emperor, who was free to land his forces anywhere along the African coast. Yet, Genseric was spared from certain ruin by the betrayal of some powerful subjects, either jealous of or fearful about their ruler's success. With their insider knowledge, he caught the unprotected fleet in the Bay of Carthagena by surprise: many ships were sunk, captured, or burned, and the results of three years of preparation were wiped out in a single day. After this event, the behavior of both rivals showed their resilience. The Vandal, instead of basking in his unexpected victory, immediately renewed his pleas for peace. The emperor of the West, capable of grand plans and enduring disappointments, agreed to a treaty—or rather a ceasefire—with the strong belief that, before he could rebuild his navy, he would find reasons to justify a second war. Majorian returned to Italy, determined to continue his efforts for public welfare; and, confident in his integrity, he might remain unaware of the dark plot that threatened both his throne and his life. The recent disaster at Carthagena tarnished the glory that had captivated the public's attention; nearly every type of civil and military officer turned against the Reformer, as they all benefited from the abuses he aimed to end. The patrician Ricimer stirred the fickle emotions of the Barbarians against a ruler he both respected and despised. Majorian’s virtues couldn’t shield him from the violent rebellion that erupted in the camp near Tortona, at the base of the Alps. He was forced to give up the Imperial title: five days later, it was rumored he died from dysentery, and the simple tomb that held his remains was honored by the respect and gratitude of future generations. Majorian’s personal character inspired love and admiration. Hurtful rumors and satire made him angry, or, if he was the target, he dismissed them with scorn; yet he defended the freedom of expression, and in moments spent with the close company of his friends, he enjoyed lighthearted banter without undermining the dignity of his rank.
It was not, perhaps, without some regret, that Ricimer sacrificed his friend to the interest of his ambition: but he resolved, in a second choice, to avoid the imprudent preference of superior virtue and merit. At his command, the obsequious senate of Rome bestowed the Imperial title on Libius Severus, who ascended the throne of the West without emerging from the obscurity of a private condition. History has scarcely deigned to notice his birth, his elevation, his character, or his death. Severus expired, as soon as his life became inconvenient to his patron; and it would be useless to discriminate his nominal reign in the vacant interval of six years, between the death of Majorian and the elevation of Anthemius. During that period, the government was in the hands of Ricimer alone; and, although the modest Barbarian disclaimed the name of king, he accumulated treasures, formed a separate army, negotiated private alliances, and ruled Italy with the same independent and despotic authority, which was afterwards exercised by Odoacer and Theodoric. But his dominions were bounded by the Alps; and two Roman generals, Marcellinus and Ægidius, maintained their allegiance to the republic, by rejecting, with disdain, the phantom which he styled an emperor. Marcellinus still adhered to the old religion; and the devout Pagans, who secretly disobeyed the laws of the church and state, applauded his profound skill in the science of divination. But he possessed the more valuable qualifications of learning, virtue, and courage; the study of the Latin literature had improved his taste; and his military talents had recommended him to the esteem and confidence of the great Ætius, in whose ruin he was involved. By a timely flight, Marcellinus escaped the rage of Valentinian, and boldly asserted his liberty amidst the convulsions of the Western empire. His voluntary, or reluctant, submission to the authority of Majorian, was rewarded by the government of Sicily, and the command of an army, stationed in that island to oppose, or to attack, the Vandals; but his Barbarian mercenaries, after the emperor's death, were tempted to revolt by the artful liberality of Ricimer. At the head of a band of faithful followers, the intrepid Marcellinus occupied the province of Dalmatia, assumed the title of patrician of the West, secured the love of his subjects by a mild and equitable reign, built a fleet which claimed the dominion of the Adriatic, and alternately alarmed the coasts of Italy and of Africa. Ægidius, the master-general of Gaul, who equalled, or at least who imitated, the heroes of ancient Rome, proclaimed his immortal resentment against the assassins of his beloved master. A brave and numerous army was attached to his standard: and, though he was prevented by the arts of Ricimer, and the arms of the Visigoths, from marching to the gates of Rome, he maintained his independent sovereignty beyond the Alps, and rendered the name of Ægidius, respectable both in peace and war. The Franks, who had punished with exile the youthful follies of Childeric, elected the Roman general for their king: his vanity, rather than his ambition, was gratified by that singular honor; and when the nation, at the end of four years, repented of the injury which they had offered to the Merovingian family, he patiently acquiesced in the restoration of the lawful prince. The authority of Ægidius ended only with his life, and the suspicions of poison and secret violence, which derived some countenance from the character of Ricimer, were eagerly entertained by the passionate credulity of the Gauls.
It wasn’t without some regret that Ricimer sacrificed his friend for his own ambition. However, he decided to avoid the reckless choice of someone with superior virtue and talent the next time around. At his command, the obedient Senate of Rome granted the Imperial title to Libius Severus, who took the throne of the West without ever stepping out of the shadows of private life. History has barely acknowledged his birth, rise, character, or death. Severus died as soon as it became inconvenient for his patron, and it would be pointless to distinguish his nominal reign in the six empty years between Majorian’s death and Anthemius’s ascent. During that time, Ricimer held all the power; and although the humble Barbarian rejected the title of king, he built up wealth, formed a separate army, made private alliances, and ruled Italy with the same independent and oppressive authority later exercised by Odoacer and Theodoric. However, his territory was limited to the Alps, and two Roman generals, Marcellinus and Ægidius, stayed loyal to the republic by disdainfully rejecting his so-called emperor. Marcellinus remained loyal to the old religion, and devout Pagans, who secretly disobeyed the church and state laws, admired his deep knowledge of divination. He also had valuable qualities like learning, virtue, and courage; studying Latin literature had refined his taste, and his military skills earned him the respect and trust of the great Ætius, whose downfall he shared. By escaping at the right moment, Marcellinus avoided Valentinian’s wrath and bravely claimed his freedom amidst the turmoil of the Western Empire. His voluntary or reluctant submission to Majorian’s authority earned him the government of Sicily and command of an army in the island to confront or attack the Vandals. However, his Barbarian mercenaries were lured to revolt by Ricimer’s crafty generosity after the emperor’s death. Leading a group of loyal followers, the fearless Marcellinus seized the province of Dalmatia, took the title of patrician of the West, won his subjects’ affection through a fair and just reign, built a fleet that claimed control of the Adriatic, and alternately threatened the coasts of Italy and Africa. Ægidius, the master-general of Gaul, emulated the heroes of ancient Rome and expressed his eternal anger towards the assassins of his beloved leader. A brave and large army rallied to his cause, and even though he was prevented by Ricimer’s schemes and the Visigoths’ attacks from reaching the gates of Rome, he retained his independent rule beyond the Alps, earning respect for the name Ægidius in both peace and war. The Franks, having exiled the youthful Childeric for his reckless behavior, chose the Roman general as their king. His vanity, rather than ambition, was satisfied by this unusual honor, and when the nation regretted their decision to oust the Merovingian family after four years, he patiently accepted the return of the rightful prince. Ægidius’s authority lasted only until his death, and the suspicions of poison and foul play, which were bolstered by Ricimer’s reputation, were eagerly embraced by the passionate belief of the Gauls.
The kingdom of Italy, a name to which the Western empire was gradually reduced, was afflicted, under the reign of Ricimer, by the incessant depredations of the Vandal pirates. In the spring of each year, they equipped a formidable navy in the port of Carthage; and Genseric himself, though in a very advanced age, still commanded in person the most important expeditions. His designs were concealed with impenetrable secrecy, till the moment that he hoisted sail. When he was asked, by his pilot, what course he should steer, "Leave the determination to the winds, (replied the Barbarian, with pious arrogance;) they will transport us to the guilty coast, whose inhabitants have provoked the divine justice;" but if Genseric himself deigned to issue more precise orders, he judged the most wealthy to be the most criminal. The Vandals repeatedly visited the coasts of Spain, Liguria, Tuscany, Campania, Lucania, Bruttium, Apulia, Calabria, Venetia, Dalmatia, Epirus, Greece, and Sicily: they were tempted to subdue the Island of Sardinia, so advantageously placed in the centre of the Mediterranean; and their arms spread desolation, or terror, from the columns of Hercules to the mouth of the Nile. As they were more ambitious of spoil than of glory, they seldom attacked any fortified cities, or engaged any regular troops in the open field. But the celerity of their motions enabled them, almost at the same time, to threaten and to attack the most distant objects, which attracted their desires; and as they always embarked a sufficient number of horses, they had no sooner landed, than they swept the dismayed country with a body of light cavalry. Yet, notwithstanding the example of their king, the native Vandals and Alani insensibly declined this toilsome and perilous warfare; the hardy generation of the first conquerors was almost extinguished, and their sons, who were born in Africa, enjoyed the delicious baths and gardens which had been acquired by the valor of their fathers. Their place was readily supplied by a various multitude of Moors and Romans, of captives and outlaws; and those desperate wretches, who had already violated the laws of their country, were the most eager to promote the atrocious acts which disgrace the victories of Genseric. In the treatment of his unhappy prisoners, he sometimes consulted his avarice, and sometimes indulged his cruelty; and the massacre of five hundred noble citizens of Zant or Zacynthus, whose mangled bodies he cast into the Ionian Sea, was imputed, by the public indignation, to his latest posterity.
The kingdom of Italy, a name that represented the decline of the Western empire, suffered under Ricimer's reign due to the constant attacks from the Vandal pirates. Every spring, they launched a strong navy from the port of Carthage; even at an old age, Genseric personally led the most significant expeditions. His plans were kept secret until the moment they set sail. When his pilot asked what course to take, the Barbarian replied arrogantly, "Leave it up to the winds; they'll take us to the guilty shore, whose inhabitants have angered divine justice." If Genseric ever gave specific orders, he considered the wealthiest targets to be the most deserving of attack. The Vandals frequently raided the shores of Spain, Liguria, Tuscany, Campania, Lucania, Bruttium, Apulia, Calabria, Venetia, Dalmatia, Epirus, Greece, and Sicily. They were tempted to conquer Sardinia, strategically located in the center of the Mediterranean, and their assaults caused destruction and fear from the pillars of Hercules to the Nile's mouth. More interested in plunder than glory, they rarely attacked fortified cities or engaged regular troops in open battle. However, their speed allowed them to threaten and strike distant targets simultaneously, and since they always brought enough horses, they quickly swept through the terrified countryside with their light cavalry as soon as they landed. Despite their king’s example, the local Vandals and Alani gradually turned away from this arduous and dangerous warfare; the resilient spirit of the first conquerors had nearly faded, and their sons, born in Africa, enjoyed the luxurious baths and gardens earned by their fathers' bravery. Their places were easily filled by a diverse crowd of Moors and Romans, captives and outcasts; those desperate individuals, already breaking their country's laws, were the most enthusiastic in supporting the brutal actions that tarnished Genseric’s victories. In dealing with his unfortunate captives, he was sometimes driven by greed and other times by cruelty; the massacre of five hundred noble citizens from Zant or Zacynthus, whose dismembered bodies he dumped into the Ionian Sea, earned public outrage that was directed toward his descendants.
Such crimes could not be excused by any provocations; but the war, which the king of the Vandals prosecuted against the Roman empire was justified by a specious and reasonable motive. The widow of Valentinian, Eudoxia, whom he had led captive from Rome to Carthage, was the sole heiress of the Theodosian house; her elder daughter, Eudocia, became the reluctant wife of Hunneric, his eldest son; and the stern father, asserting a legal claim, which could not easily be refuted or satisfied, demanded a just proportion of the Imperial patrimony. An adequate, or at least a valuable, compensation, was offered by the Eastern emperor, to purchase a necessary peace. Eudoxia and her younger daughter, Placidia, were honorably restored, and the fury of the Vandals was confined to the limits of the Western empire. The Italians, destitute of a naval force, which alone was capable of protecting their coasts, implored the aid of the more fortunate nations of the East; who had formerly acknowledged, in peace and war, the supremacy of Rome. But the perpetual divisions of the two empires had alienated their interest and their inclinations; the faith of a recent treaty was alleged; and the Western Romans, instead of arms and ships, could only obtain the assistance of a cold and ineffectual mediation. The haughty Ricimer, who had long struggled with the difficulties of his situation, was at length reduced to address the throne of Constantinople, in the humble language of a subject; and Italy submitted, as the price and security to accept a master from the choice of the emperor of the East. It is not the purpose of the present chapter, or even of the present volume, to continue the distinct series of the Byzantine history; but a concise view of the reign and character of the emperor Leo, may explain the last efforts that were attempted to save the falling empire of the West.
Such crimes couldn't be justified by any provocations; however, the war that the king of the Vandals waged against the Roman Empire was backed by a seemingly reasonable motive. The widow of Valentinian, Eudoxia, whom he had taken from Rome to Carthage, was the sole heir of the Theodosian dynasty; her elder daughter, Eudocia, reluctantly became the wife of Hunneric, his oldest son; and the stern father, asserting a legal claim that was hard to dispute, demanded a fair share of the Imperial inheritance. The Eastern emperor offered an adequate, or at least a valuable, compensation to secure a necessary peace. Eudoxia and her younger daughter, Placidia, were honorably returned, and the anger of the Vandals was contained within the Western Empire's boundaries. The Italians, lacking a navy that could protect their coasts, begged for help from the more fortunate nations of the East, which had previously recognized the supremacy of Rome in both peace and war. However, the ongoing divisions between the two empires had driven a wedge between their interests and sympathies; a recent treaty was cited, and the Western Romans could only secure the assistance of a cold and ineffective mediation instead of military support. The proud Ricimer, who had long been grappling with the challenges of his position, was finally forced to address the throne of Constantinople in the humble tone of a subject; and Italy submitted, paying the price and security for accepting a ruler chosen by the Eastern emperor. The purpose of this chapter, or even this volume, is not to continue the detailed series of Byzantine history, but a brief overview of Emperor Leo's reign and character may clarify the final efforts made to salvage the crumbling Western Empire.
Since the death of the younger Theodosius, the domestic repose of Constantinople had never been interrupted by war or faction. Pulcheria had bestowed her hand, and the sceptre of the East, on the modest virtue of Marcian: he gratefully reverenced her august rank and virgin chastity; and, after her death, he gave his people the example of the religious worship that was due to the memory of the Imperial saint. Attentive to the prosperity of his own dominions, Marcian seemed to behold, with indifference, the misfortunes of Rome; and the obstinate refusal of a brave and active prince, to draw his sword against the Vandals, was ascribed to a secret promise, which had formerly been exacted from him when he was a captive in the power of Genseric. The death of Marcian, after a reign of seven years, would have exposed the East to the danger of a popular election; if the superior weight of a single family had not been able to incline the balance in favor of the candidate whose interest they supported. The patrician Aspar might have placed the diadem on his own head, if he would have subscribed the Nicene creed. During three generations, the armies of the East were successively commanded by his father, by himself, and by his son Ardaburius; his Barbarian guards formed a military force that overawed the palace and the capital; and the liberal distribution of his immense treasures rendered Aspar as popular as he was powerful. He recommended the obscure name of Leo of Thrace, a military tribune, and the principal steward of his household. His nomination was unanimously ratified by the senate; and the servant of Aspar received the Imperial crown from the hands of the patriarch or bishop, who was permitted to express, by this unusual ceremony, the suffrage of the Deity. This emperor, the first of the name of Leo, has been distinguished by the title of the Great; from a succession of princes, who gradually fixed in the opinion of the Greeks a very humble standard of heroic, or at least of royal, perfection. Yet the temperate firmness with which Leo resisted the oppression of his benefactor, showed that he was conscious of his duty and of his prerogative. Aspar was astonished to find that his influence could no longer appoint a præfect of Constantinople: he presumed to reproach his sovereign with a breach of promise, and insolently shaking his purple, "It is not proper, (said he,) that the man who is invested with this garment, should be guilty of lying." "Nor is it proper, (replied Leo,) that a prince should be compelled to resign his own judgment, and the public interest, to the will of a subject." After this extraordinary scene, it was impossible that the reconciliation of the emperor and the patrician could be sincere; or, at least, that it could be solid and permanent. An army of Isaurians was secretly levied, and introduced into Constantinople; and while Leo undermined the authority, and prepared the disgrace, of the family of Aspar, his mild and cautious behavior restrained them from any rash and desperate attempts, which might have been fatal to themselves, or their enemies. The measures of peace and war were affected by this internal revolution. As long as Aspar degraded the majesty of the throne, the secret correspondence of religion and interest engaged him to favor the cause of Genseric. When Leo had delivered himself from that ignominious servitude, he listened to the complaints of the Italians; resolved to extirpate the tyranny of the Vandals; and declared his alliance with his colleague, Anthemius, whom he solemnly invested with the diadem and purple of the West.
Since the death of the younger Theodosius, there had been no interruptions from war or faction in the peace of Constantinople. Pulcheria had married the virtuous Marcian and handed him the rule of the East: he respected her high status and virgin purity, and after her death, he set an example for his people in honoring the memory of the Imperial saint. Focused on the well-being of his own lands, Marcian appeared indifferent to Rome's troubles; his refusal to fight against the Vandals was seen as a hidden promise made when he was captured by Genseric. The death of Marcian after seven years of rule would have left the East vulnerable to a popular election if not for the influence of a single family that tilted the scale toward their preferred candidate. The patrician Aspar could have claimed the crown for himself if he had agreed to the Nicene creed. Over three generations, the Eastern armies were led by his father, himself, and his son Ardaburius; his Barbarian guards created a military presence that intimidated the palace and city, and his generous sharing of wealth made Aspar as popular as he was powerful. He suggested the little-known Leo of Thrace, a military tribune and the main steward of his household, for the throne. The senate unanimously approved this choice, and Aspar's servant was crowned emperor by the patriarch or bishop, signifying divine approval through this unusual ceremony. This emperor, the first to bear the name Leo, was later known as Leo the Great; succeeding rulers gradually set a low bar for heroism or royal excellence in the minds of the Greeks. Nonetheless, Leo’s steady determination to resist his benefactor's control showed he understood his responsibilities and rights. Aspar was shocked to find he could no longer appoint a præfect of Constantinople; he dared to accuse the emperor of breaking a promise, and angrily declared, "It's inappropriate for a man in this robe to lie." Leo replied, "Nor is it appropriate for a prince to give up his judgment and the public good to a subject's will." After this remarkable exchange, any reconciliation between the emperor and Aspar couldn’t be genuine, or at least, it couldn't be strong or lasting. A secret army of Isaurians was raised and brought into Constantinople; while Leo worked to undermine Aspar’s authority and set up his disgrace, his calm and careful demeanor kept both sides from making reckless moves that could have ruined them. This internal shift influenced decisions on peace and war. As long as Aspar diminished the throne’s dignity, his secret ties of religion and interest led him to support Genseric’s cause. Once Leo freed himself from that humiliating subservience, he listened to the Italians' grievances, determined to put an end to the Vandal tyranny, and declared his alliance with his counterpart, Anthemius, whom he officially crowned with the diadem and purple of the West.
The virtues of Anthemius have perhaps been magnified, since the Imperial descent, which he could only deduce from the usurper Procopius, has been swelled into a line of emperors. But the merit of his immediate parents, their honors, and their riches, rendered Anthemius one of the most illustrious subjects of the East. His father, Procopius, obtained, after his Persian embassy, the rank of general and patrician; and the name of Anthemius was derived from his maternal grandfather, the celebrated præfect, who protected, with so much ability and success, the infant reign of Theodosius. The grandson of the præfect was raised above the condition of a private subject, by his marriage with Euphemia, the daughter of the emperor Marcian. This splendid alliance, which might supersede the necessity of merit, hastened the promotion of Anthemius to the successive dignities of count, of master-general, of consul, and of patrician; and his merit or fortune claimed the honors of a victory, which was obtained on the banks of the Danube, over the Huns. Without indulging an extravagant ambition, the son-in-law of Marcian might hope to be his successor; but Anthemius supported the disappointment with courage and patience; and his subsequent elevation was universally approved by the public, who esteemed him worthy to reign, till he ascended the throne. The emperor of the West marched from Constantinople, attended by several counts of high distinction, and a body of guards almost equal to the strength and numbers of a regular army: he entered Rome in triumph, and the choice of Leo was confirmed by the senate, the people, and the Barbarian confederates of Italy. The solemn inauguration of Anthemius was followed by the nuptials of his daughter and the patrician Ricimer; a fortunate event, which was considered as the firmest security of the union and happiness of the state. The wealth of two empires was ostentatiously displayed; and many senators completed their ruin, by an expensive effort to disguise their poverty. All serious business was suspended during this festival; the courts of justice were shut; the streets of Rome, the theatres, the places of public and private resort, resounded with hymeneal songs and dances: and the royal bride, clothed in silken robes, with a crown on her head, was conducted to the palace of Ricimer, who had changed his military dress for the habit of a consul and a senator. On this memorable occasion, Sidonius, whose early ambition had been so fatally blasted, appeared as the orator of Auvergne, among the provincial deputies who addressed the throne with congratulations or complaints. The calends of January were now approaching, and the venal poet, who had loved Avitus, and esteemed Majorian, was persuaded by his friends to celebrate, in heroic verse, the merit, the felicity, the second consulship, and the future triumphs, of the emperor Anthemius. Sidonius pronounced, with assurance and success, a panegyric which is still extant; and whatever might be the imperfections, either of the subject or of the composition, the welcome flatterer was immediately rewarded with the præfecture of Rome; a dignity which placed him among the illustrious personages of the empire, till he wisely preferred the more respectable character of a bishop and a saint.
The virtues of Anthemius have likely been exaggerated, as the Imperial lineage he could only trace back to the usurper Procopius has been inflated into a dynasty of emperors. However, the achievements and wealth of his immediate family made Anthemius one of the most prominent individuals in the East. His father, Procopius, gained the rank of general and patrician after his Persian embassy, and the name Anthemius came from his maternal grandfather, the famous præfect who skillfully supported the early reign of Theodosius. The grandson of the præfect was elevated above the status of a commoner through his marriage to Euphemia, the daughter of Emperor Marcian. This impressive alliance, which could overshadow the need for personal merit, fast-tracked Anthemius's rise to various prestigious roles, including count, master-general, consul, and patrician; his achievements or fortune also earned him honors for a victory over the Huns along the Danube. Without indulging in excessive ambition, the son-in-law of Marcian could reasonably aspire to succeed him, but Anthemius faced his disappointments with courage and patience. His later rise to power was widely applauded by the public, who deemed him fit to rule, until he finally took the throne. The emperor of the West left Constantinople, accompanied by high-ranking counts and a guard nearly as strong as a formal army; he entered Rome in triumph, and the senate, the people, and the Barbarian allies of Italy confirmed Leo's choice. The formal inauguration of Anthemius was followed by the wedding of his daughter to the patrician Ricimer; an event viewed as a strong assurance of the state's unity and prosperity. The wealth of two empires was prominently showcased, while many senators suffered financial ruin in their attempts to hide their poverty. All serious matters were paused during this celebration; courts were closed; streets of Rome, theatres, and public and private gathering spots echoed with wedding songs and dances: the royal bride, adorned in silk robes and a crown, was led to Ricimer's palace, where he had traded his military attire for the clothing of a consul and senator. On this significant occasion, Sidonius, whose early ambitions had been tragically thwarted, appeared as the orator from Auvergne, among provincial representatives congratulating or voicing grievances to the throne. As the calends of January approached, the paid poet, who had admired Avitus and respected Majorian, was encouraged by friends to honor, in epic poetry, the accomplishments, happiness, second consulship, and future victories of Emperor Anthemius. Sidonius confidently and successfully delivered a panegyric that still exists today; and despite any flaws in either the subject or the work itself, the appreciative flatterer was swiftly rewarded with the præfecture of Rome, a position that placed him among the empire's distinguished figures, until he wisely chose the more respected roles of bishop and saint.
The Greeks ambitiously commend the piety and catholic faith of the emperor whom they gave to the West; nor do they forget to observe, that when he left Constantinople, he converted his palace into the pious foundation of a public bath, a church, and a hospital for old men. Yet some suspicious appearances are found to sully the theological fame of Anthemius. From the conversation of Philotheus, a Macedonian sectary, he had imbibed the spirit of religious toleration; and the Heretics of Rome would have assembled with impunity, if the bold and vehement censure which Pope Hilary pronounced in the church of St. Peter, had not obliged him to abjure the unpopular indulgence. Even the Pagans, a feeble and obscure remnant, conceived some vain hopes, from the indifference, or partiality, of Anthemius; and his singular friendship for the philosopher Severus, whom he promoted to the consulship, was ascribed to a secret project, of reviving the ancient worship of the gods. These idols were crumbled into dust: and the mythology which had once been the creed of nations, was so universally disbelieved, that it might be employed without scandal, or at least without suspicion, by Christian poets. Yet the vestiges of superstition were not absolutely obliterated, and the festival of the Lupercalia, whose origin had preceded the foundation of Rome, was still celebrated under the reign of Anthemius. The savage and simple rites were expressive of an early state of society before the invention of arts and agriculture. The rustic deities who presided over the toils and pleasures of the pastoral life, Pan, Faunus, and their train of satyrs, were such as the fancy of shepherds might create, sportive, petulant, and lascivious; whose power was limited, and whose malice was inoffensive. A goat was the offering the best adapted to their character and attributes; the flesh of the victim was roasted on willow spits; and the riotous youths, who crowded to the feast, ran naked about the fields, with leather thongs in their hands, communicating, as it was supposed, the blessing of fecundity to the women whom they touched. The altar of Pan was erected, perhaps by Evander the Arcadian, in a dark recess in the side of the Palantine hill, watered by a perpetual fountain, and shaded by a hanging grove. A tradition, that, in the same place, Romulus and Remus were suckled by the wolf, rendered it still more sacred and venerable in the eyes of the Romans; and this sylvan spot was gradually surrounded by the stately edifices of the Forum. After the conversion of the Imperial city, the Christians still continued, in the month of February, the annual celebration of the Lupercalia; to which they ascribed a secret and mysterious influence on the genial powers of the animal and vegetable world. The bishops of Rome were solicitous to abolish a profane custom, so repugnant to the spirit of Christianity; but their zeal was not supported by the authority of the civil magistrate: the inveterate abuse subsisted till the end of the fifth century, and Pope Gelasius, who purified the capital from the last stain of idolatry, appeased by a formal apology, the murmurs of the senate and people.
The Greeks eagerly praise the piety and universal faith of the emperor they contributed to the West; they also note that when he left Constantinople, he turned his palace into a charitable establishment that included a public bath, a church, and a home for the elderly. However, some questionable aspects tarnish Anthemius's theological reputation. From discussions with Philotheus, a Macedonian sectarian, he embraced the idea of religious tolerance; and the heretics of Rome would have gathered freely if it hadn't been for the bold and forceful criticism pronounced by Pope Hilary in the Church of St. Peter, which forced him to renounce the unpopular concession. Even the Pagans, a weak and obscure remnant, held some misguided hopes due to Anthemius's indifference or favoritism, and his close friendship with the philosopher Severus, whom he appointed consul, was often interpreted as a covert plan to revive the ancient worship of the gods. These idols had turned to dust, and the mythology that once served as the belief system for many was so widely disbelieved that it could be referenced without scandal—at least among Christian poets. Yet remnants of superstition weren’t entirely erased, and the festival of Lupercalia, which predated the founding of Rome, was still celebrated during Anthemius's reign. The crude and simple rites represented an early societal phase before the advent of the arts and agriculture. The rustic gods who oversaw the labor and leisure of pastoral life, like Pan, Faunus, and their band of satyrs, were imagined by shepherds to be playful, mischievous, and lustful; their power was limited and their malice harmless. A goat was the offering that best suited their nature; its flesh was roasted on willow spits, and the rowdy youth who flocked to the feast ran naked in the fields, carrying leather thongs, believed to be bestowing fertility blessings on the women they touched. The altar of Pan was possibly built by Evander the Arcadian in a secluded spot on the Palatine Hill, nourished by an everlasting spring and shaded by a hanging grove. A legend suggesting that Romulus and Remus were nursed by the wolf at the same location made it even more sacred and respected among Romans; this natural site was gradually enveloped by the grand structures of the Forum. After the conversion of the Imperial city, Christians continued the annual observance of Lupercalia in February, attributing a secret and mystical influence on the reproductive forces of nature. The bishops of Rome were eager to eliminate this irreverent practice, which was so contrary to the essence of Christianity; however, their enthusiasm lacked the backing of civil authority: this long-standing custom persisted until the end of the fifth century, and Pope Gelasius, who cleansed the capital of the last traces of idolatry, appeased the murmurs of the senate and people with a formal apology.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part IV.
In all his public declarations, the emperor Leo assumes the authority, and professes the affection, of a father, for his son Anthemius, with whom he had divided the administration of the universe. The situation, and perhaps the character, of Leo, dissuaded him from exposing his person to the toils and dangers of an African war. But the powers of the Eastern empire were strenuously exerted to deliver Italy and the Mediterranean from the Vandals; and Genseric, who had so long oppressed both the land and sea, was threatened from every side with a formidable invasion. The campaign was opened by a bold and successful enterprise of the præfect Heraclius. The troops of Egypt, Thebais, and Libya, were embarked, under his command; and the Arabs, with a train of horses and camels, opened the roads of the desert. Heraclius landed on the coast of Tripoli, surprised and subdued the cities of that province, and prepared, by a laborious march, which Cato had formerly executed, to join the Imperial army under the walls of Carthage. The intelligence of this loss extorted from Genseric some insidious and ineffectual propositions of peace; but he was still more seriously alarmed by the reconciliation of Marcellinus with the two empires. The independent patrician had been persuaded to acknowledge the legitimate title of Anthemius, whom he accompanied in his journey to Rome; the Dalmatian fleet was received into the harbors of Italy; the active valor of Marcellinus expelled the Vandals from the Island of Sardinia; and the languid efforts of the West added some weight to the immense preparations of the Eastern Romans. The expense of the naval armament, which Leo sent against the Vandals, has been distinctly ascertained; and the curious and instructive account displays the wealth of the declining empire. The Royal demesnes, or private patrimony of the prince, supplied seventeen thousand pounds of gold; forty-seven thousand pounds of gold, and seven hundred thousand of silver, were levied and paid into the treasury by the Prætorian præfects. But the cities were reduced to extreme poverty; and the diligent calculation of fines and forfeitures, as a valuable object of the revenue, does not suggest the idea of a just or merciful administration. The whole expense, by whatsoever means it was defrayed, of the African campaign, amounted to the sum of one hundred and thirty thousand pounds of gold, about five millions two hundred thousand pounds sterling, at a time when the value of money appears, from the comparative price of corn, to have been somewhat higher than in the present age. The fleet that sailed from Constantinople to Carthage, consisted of eleven hundred and thirteen ships, and the number of soldiers and mariners exceeded one hundred thousand men. Basiliscus, the brother of the empress Vorina, was intrusted with this important command. His sister, the wife of Leo, had exaggerated the merit of his former exploits against the Scythians. But the discovery of his guilt, or incapacity, was reserved for the African war; and his friends could only save his military reputation by asserting, that he had conspired with Aspar to spare Genseric, and to betray the last hope of the Western empire.
In all his public statements, Emperor Leo acts like a father to his son Anthemius, with whom he has shared control over the administration of the empire. Leo's circumstances, and perhaps his character, kept him from personally taking on the challenges and dangers of a war in Africa. However, the Eastern Empire put tremendous effort into freeing Italy and the Mediterranean from the Vandals, and Genseric, who had oppressed both land and sea for so long, faced a serious threat from all sides. The campaign began with a daring and successful mission led by the prefect Heraclius. He commanded troops from Egypt, Thebais, and Libya, while the Arabs, with their horses and camels, cleared the desert roads. Heraclius landed on the coast of Tripoli, surprising and conquering the cities in that region, and made a strenuous march, similar to one previously done by Cato, to join the Imperial army at the walls of Carthage. Genseric was forced into making some deceitful and useless peace proposals after learning of this loss, but he was even more alarmed by Marcellinus's alignment with the two empires. The independent patrician was convinced to acknowledge Anthemius's legitimate claim and accompanied him on his journey to Rome; the Dalmatian fleet took refuge in Italy's harbors; Marcellinus's vigorous actions drove the Vandals from Sardinia; and the limited efforts from the West gave some support to the massive preparations of the Eastern Romans. The costs for the naval forces that Leo sent against the Vandals have been clearly documented, revealing the wealth of the declining empire. The royal lands, or the prince's private holdings, contributed seventeen thousand pounds of gold; the Prætorian prefects collected and deposited forty-seven thousand pounds of gold and seven hundred thousand pounds of silver into the treasury. However, the cities were left in dire poverty; and the relentless focus on fines and forfeitures as a revenue source does not paint a picture of fair or compassionate governance. The total cost, regardless of how it was funded, for the African campaign was one hundred thirty thousand pounds of gold, roughly five million two hundred thousand pounds sterling, at a time when money seemed to be worth slightly more than it is today based on the comparative price of grain. The fleet that set sail from Constantinople to Carthage had eleven hundred thirteen ships, and the total number of soldiers and sailors exceeded one hundred thousand men. Basiliscus, the brother of Empress Vorina, was given this crucial command. His sister, Leo's wife, had exaggerated his previous achievements against the Scythians. However, the discovery of his guilt or failure was saved for the African war, and his supporters could only defend his military reputation by claiming that he had conspired with Aspar to spare Genseric and to betray the last hope of the Western Empire.
Experience has shown, that the success of an invader most commonly depends on the vigor and celerity of his operations. The strength and sharpness of the first impression are blunted by delay; the health and spirit of the troops insensibly languish in a distant climate; the naval and military force, a mighty effort which perhaps can never be repeated, is silently consumed; and every hour that is wasted in negotiation, accustoms the enemy to contemplate and examine those hostile terrors, which, on their first appearance, he deemed irresistible. The formidable navy of Basiliscus pursued its prosperous navigation from the Thracian Bosphorus to the coast of Africa. He landed his troops at Cape Bona, or the promontory of Mercury, about forty miles from Carthage. The army of Heraclius, and the fleet of Marcellinus, either joined or seconded the Imperial lieutenant; and the Vandals who opposed his progress by sea or land, were successively vanquished. If Basiliscus had seized the moment of consternation, and boldly advanced to the capital, Carthage must have surrendered, and the kingdom of the Vandals was extinguished. Genseric beheld the danger with firmness, and eluded it with his veteran dexterity. He protested, in the most respectful language, that he was ready to submit his person, and his dominions, to the will of the emperor; but he requested a truce of five days to regulate the terms of his submission; and it was universally believed, that his secret liberality contributed to the success of this public negotiation. Instead of obstinately refusing whatever indulgence his enemy so earnestly solicited, the guilty, or the credulous, Basiliscus consented to the fatal truce; and his imprudent security seemed to proclaim, that he already considered himself as the conqueror of Africa. During this short interval, the wind became favorable to the designs of Genseric. He manned his largest ships of war with the bravest of the Moors and Vandals; and they towed after them many large barks, filled with combustible materials. In the obscurity of the night, these destructive vessels were impelled against the unguarded and unsuspecting fleet of the Romans, who were awakened by the sense of their instant danger. Their close and crowded order assisted the progress of the fire, which was communicated with rapid and irresistible violence; and the noise of the wind, the crackling of the flames, the dissonant cries of the soldiers and mariners, who could neither command nor obey, increased the horror of the nocturnal tumult. Whilst they labored to extricate themselves from the fire-ships, and to save at least a part of the navy, the galleys of Genseric assaulted them with temperate and disciplined valor; and many of the Romans, who escaped the fury of the flames, were destroyed or taken by the victorious Vandals. Among the events of that disastrous night, the heroic, or rather desperate, courage of John, one of the principal officers of Basiliscus, has rescued his name from oblivion. When the ship, which he had bravely defended, was almost consumed, he threw himself in his armor into the sea, disdainfully rejected the esteem and pity of Genso, the son of Genseric, who pressed him to accept honorable quarter, and sunk under the waves; exclaiming, with his last breath, that he would never fall alive into the hands of those impious dogs. Actuated by a far different spirit, Basiliscus, whose station was the most remote from danger, disgracefully fled in the beginning of the engagement, returned to Constantinople with the loss of more than half of his fleet and army, and sheltered his guilty head in the sanctuary of St. Sophia, till his sister, by her tears and entreaties, could obtain his pardon from the indignant emperor. Heraclius effected his retreat through the desert; Marcellinus retired to Sicily, where he was assassinated, perhaps at the instigation of Ricimer, by one of his own captains; and the king of the Vandals expressed his surprise and satisfaction, that the Romans themselves should remove from the world his most formidable antagonists. After the failure of this great expedition, Genseric again became the tyrant of the sea: the coasts of Italy, Greece, and Asia, were again exposed to his revenge and avarice; Tripoli and Sardinia returned to his obedience; he added Sicily to the number of his provinces; and before he died, in the fulness of years and of glory, he beheld the final extinction of the empire of the West.
Experience has shown that the success of an invader often relies on the speed and energy of their actions. Delays dull the impact of the initial strike; the troops' morale and health gradually suffer in a foreign climate; the military and naval forces, a significant effort that may never be replicated, are quietly depleted; and every hour wasted on negotiations allows the enemy to confront and assess the threats that initially seemed unstoppable. The powerful navy of Basiliscus sailed successfully from the Thracian Bosphorus to the coast of Africa. He landed his troops at Cape Bona, or the promontory of Mercury, about forty miles from Carthage. The army of Heraclius and the fleet of Marcellinus either joined or supported the Imperial lieutenant, and the Vandals who tried to block his advances by land and sea were gradually defeated. If Basiliscus had seized the moment of panic and boldly moved towards the capital, Carthage would have surrendered, and the Vandal kingdom would have been dismantled. Genseric faced the danger calmly and navigated it with his seasoned skills. He respectfully stated that he was willing to submit himself and his territory to the emperor's will, but he requested a five-day truce to negotiate the terms of his submission; it was widely believed that his quiet generosity aided the success of this public negotiation. Instead of obstinately denying his enemy’s requests for leniency, the guilty or naive Basiliscus agreed to the dangerous truce, and his reckless confidence suggested he already saw himself as the victor of Africa. During this brief period, the wind favored Genseric's plans. He manned his largest warships with the bravest Moors and Vandals, and they towed many large boats filled with flammable materials. Under the cover of night, these destructive vessels were sent against the unprotected and unsuspecting Roman fleet, which was suddenly aware of their imminent danger. The tight formation of the Roman ships fueled the spread of the fire with rapid and unstoppable force; the wind's roar, the crackling flames, and the chaotic cries of the soldiers and sailors, who couldn’t lead or follow, heightened the terror of the nighttime mayhem. While they struggled to escape the fire-ships and save at least part of the navy, Genseric's galleys attacked them with measured and disciplined valor; many Romans who survived the flames were either killed or captured by the victorious Vandals. Among the events of that disastrous night, the brave, or rather desperate, courage of John, a top officer of Basiliscus, has kept his name from being forgotten. When the ship he was valiantly defending was nearly engulfed in flames, he jumped into the sea in his armor, disdainfully dismissing the offer of honorable quarter from Genso, Genseric's son, and disappeared beneath the waves, declaring with his last breath that he would never fall alive into the hands of those wicked dogs. In stark contrast, Basiliscus, who was far from the threat, shamefully fled at the start of the battle, returning to Constantinople with the loss of more than half of his fleet and army, and hid his guilty head in the sanctuary of St. Sophia until his sister, through her tears and pleas, obtained his pardon from the outraged emperor. Heraclius made his escape through the desert; Marcellinus retreated to Sicily, where he was assassinated, possibly at the urging of Ricimer, by one of his own officers; and the Vandal king expressed his surprise and satisfaction that the Romans themselves had removed from existence his most formidable opponents. After the failure of this great campaign, Genseric resumed his tyranny over the sea: the coasts of Italy, Greece, and Asia were again at risk from his wrath and greed; Tripoli and Sardinia returned to his control; he added Sicily to his list of provinces; and before he died, enjoying a long life with glory, he witnessed the complete collapse of the Western Empire.
During his long and active reign, the African monarch had studiously cultivated the friendship of the Barbarians of Europe, whose arms he might employ in a seasonable and effectual diversion against the two empires. After the death of Attila, he renewed his alliance with the Visigoths of Gaul; and the sons of the elder Theodoric, who successively reigned over that warlike nation, were easily persuaded, by the sense of interest, to forget the cruel affront which Genseric had inflicted on their sister. The death of the emperor Majorian delivered Theodoric the Second from the restraint of fear, and perhaps of honor; he violated his recent treaty with the Romans; and the ample territory of Narbonne, which he firmly united to his dominions, became the immediate reward of his perfidy. The selfish policy of Ricimer encouraged him to invade the provinces which were in the possession of Ægidius, his rival; but the active count, by the defence of Arles, and the victory of Orleans, saved Gaul, and checked, during his lifetime, the progress of the Visigoths. Their ambition was soon rekindled; and the design of extinguishing the Roman empire in Spain and Gaul was conceived, and almost completed, in the reign of Euric, who assassinated his brother Theodoric, and displayed, with a more savage temper, superior abilities, both in peace and war. He passed the Pyrenees at the head of a numerous army, subdued the cities of Saragossa and Pampeluna, vanquished in battle the martial nobles of the Tarragonese province, carried his victorious arms into the heart of Lusitania, and permitted the Suevi to hold the kingdom of Gallicia under the Gothic monarchy of Spain. The efforts of Euric were not less vigorous, or less successful, in Gaul; and throughout the country that extends from the Pyrenees to the Rhone and the Loire, Berry and Auvergne were the only cities, or dioceses, which refused to acknowledge him as their master. In the defence of Clermont, their principal town, the inhabitants of Auvergne sustained, with inflexible resolution, the miseries of war, pestilence, and famine; and the Visigoths, relinquishing the fruitless siege, suspended the hopes of that important conquest. The youth of the province were animated by the heroic, and almost incredible, valor of Ecdicius, the son of the emperor Avitus, who made a desperate sally with only eighteen horsemen, boldly attacked the Gothic army, and, after maintaining a flying skirmish, retired safe and victorious within the walls of Clermont. His charity was equal to his courage: in a time of extreme scarcity, four thousand poor were fed at his expense; and his private influence levied an army of Burgundians for the deliverance of Auvergne. From his virtues alone the faithful citizens of Gaul derived any hopes of safety or freedom; and even such virtues were insufficient to avert the impending ruin of their country, since they were anxious to learn, from his authority and example, whether they should prefer the alternative of exile or servitude. The public confidence was lost; the resources of the state were exhausted; and the Gauls had too much reason to believe, that Anthemius, who reigned in Italy, was incapable of protecting his distressed subjects beyond the Alps. The feeble emperor could only procure for their defence the service of twelve thousand British auxiliaries. Riothamus, one of the independent kings, or chieftains, of the island, was persuaded to transport his troops to the continent of Gaul: he sailed up the Loire, and established his quarters in Berry, where the people complained of these oppressive allies, till they were destroyed or dispersed by the arms of the Visigoths.
During his lengthy and active rule, the African king had carefully nurtured friendships with the Barbarians of Europe, whose military might he could use for a timely and effective distraction against the two empires. After Attila's death, he renewed his alliance with the Visigoths of Gaul; the sons of the elder Theodoric, who each ruled over that warlike nation, were easily convinced, out of self-interest, to overlook the harsh insult Genseric had dealt to their sister. The death of Emperor Majorian freed Theodoric the Second from the restraints of fear and perhaps honor; he broke his recent treaty with the Romans, and the substantial territory of Narbonne, which he firmly added to his realm, became the immediate reward for his betrayal. The self-serving strategy of Ricimer motivated him to invade the provinces held by his rival Ægidius; however, the active count, through the defense of Arles and his victory in Orleans, saved Gaul, temporarily halting the Visigoths' advance. Their ambition soon reignited, and the plan to wipe out the Roman Empire in Spain and Gaul was formed and nearly realized during Euric's reign, who murdered his brother Theodoric and showed, with a more savage temperament, superior skills in both peace and war. He crossed the Pyrenees with a large army, conquered the cities of Saragossa and Pampeluna, defeated the noble warriors of the Tarragonese province in battle, marched his victorious forces into the heart of Lusitania, and allowed the Suevi to occupy the kingdom of Gallicia under the Gothic monarchy of Spain. Euric’s efforts were equally vigorous and successful in Gaul; throughout the land stretching from the Pyrenees to the Rhone and the Loire, only Berry and Auvergne refused to recognize him as their ruler. In defending Clermont, their main city, the people of Auvergne endured the hardships of war, disease, and famine with unwavering determination; and the Visigoths, abandoning the pointless siege, postponed their hopes for that crucial conquest. The youth of the province were inspired by the heroic and nearly unbelievable bravery of Ecdicius, the son of Emperor Avitus, who made a desperate charge with just eighteen horsemen, boldly attacked the Gothic army, and after a series of hit-and-run skirmishes, returned safe and victorious within the walls of Clermont. His compassion matched his bravery: during a time of severe scarcity, he fed four thousand needy people at his own expense, and his personal influence raised an army of Burgundians to rescue Auvergne. From his virtues alone, the loyal citizens of Gaul found any hope for safety or freedom; yet even those virtues were not enough to prevent the looming destruction of their homeland, as they anxiously awaited his guidance on whether to choose exile or servitude. Public trust had eroded; state resources were depleted; and the Gauls had good reason to believe that Anthemius, who ruled in Italy, was incapable of protecting his suffering subjects beyond the Alps. The weak emperor could only secure the services of twelve thousand British auxiliaries for their defense. Riothamus, one of the independent kings or leaders of the island, was convinced to bring his troops to the continent of Gaul: he sailed up the Loire and set up camp in Berry, where the people complained about these burdensome allies until they were either wiped out or scattered by the Visigoths’ forces.
One of the last acts of jurisdiction, which the Roman senate exercised over their subjects of Gaul, was the trial and condemnation of Arvandus, the Prætorian præfect. Sidonius, who rejoices that he lived under a reign in which he might pity and assist a state criminal, has expressed, with tenderness and freedom, the faults of his indiscreet and unfortunate friend. From the perils which he had escaped, Arvandus imbibed confidence rather than wisdom; and such was the various, though uniform, imprudence of his behavior, that his prosperity must appear much more surprising than his downfall. The second præfecture, which he obtained within the term of five years, abolished the merit and popularity of his preceding administration. His easy temper was corrupted by flattery, and exasperated by opposition; he was forced to satisfy his importunate creditors with the spoils of the province; his capricious insolence offended the nobles of Gaul, and he sunk under the weight of the public hatred. The mandate of his disgrace summoned him to justify his conduct before the senate; and he passed the Sea of Tuscany with a favorable wind, the presage, as he vainly imagined, of his future fortunes. A decent respect was still observed for the Præfectorian rank; and on his arrival at Rome, Arvandus was committed to the hospitality, rather than to the custody, of Flavius Asellus, the count of the sacred largesses, who resided in the Capitol. He was eagerly pursued by his accusers, the four deputies of Gaul, who were all distinguished by their birth, their dignities, or their eloquence. In the name of a great province, and according to the forms of Roman jurisprudence, they instituted a civil and criminal action, requiring such restitution as might compensate the losses of individuals, and such punishment as might satisfy the justice of the state. Their charges of corrupt oppression were numerous and weighty; but they placed their secret dependence on a letter which they had intercepted, and which they could prove, by the evidence of his secretary, to have been dictated by Arvandus himself. The author of this letter seemed to dissuade the king of the Goths from a peace with the Greek emperor: he suggested the attack of the Britons on the Loire; and he recommended a division of Gaul, according to the law of nations, between the Visigoths and the Burgundians. These pernicious schemes, which a friend could only palliate by the reproaches of vanity and indiscretion, were susceptible of a treasonable interpretation; and the deputies had artfully resolved not to produce their most formidable weapons till the decisive moment of the contest. But their intentions were discovered by the zeal of Sidonius. He immediately apprised the unsuspecting criminal of his danger; and sincerely lamented, without any mixture of anger, the haughty presumption of Arvandus, who rejected, and even resented, the salutary advice of his friends. Ignorant of his real situation, Arvandus showed himself in the Capitol in the white robe of a candidate, accepted indiscriminate salutations and offers of service, examined the shops of the merchants, the silks and gems, sometimes with the indifference of a spectator, and sometimes with the attention of a purchaser; and complained of the times, of the senate, of the prince, and of the delays of justice. His complaints were soon removed. An early day was fixed for his trial; and Arvandus appeared, with his accusers, before a numerous assembly of the Roman senate. The mournful garb which they affected, excited the compassion of the judges, who were scandalized by the gay and splendid dress of their adversary: and when the præfect Arvandus, with the first of the Gallic deputies, were directed to take their places on the senatorial benches, the same contrast of pride and modesty was observed in their behavior. In this memorable judgment, which presented a lively image of the old republic, the Gauls exposed, with force and freedom, the grievances of the province; and as soon as the minds of the audience were sufficiently inflamed, they recited the fatal epistle. The obstinacy of Arvandus was founded on the strange supposition, that a subject could not be convicted of treason, unless he had actually conspired to assume the purple. As the paper was read, he repeatedly, and with a loud voice, acknowledged it for his genuine composition; and his astonishment was equal to his dismay, when the unanimous voice of the senate declared him guilty of a capital offence. By their decree, he was degraded from the rank of a præfect to the obscure condition of a plebeian, and ignominiously dragged by servile hands to the public prison. After a fortnight's adjournment, the senate was again convened to pronounce the sentence of his death; but while he expected, in the Island of Æsculapius, the expiration of the thirty days allowed by an ancient law to the vilest malefactors, his friends interposed, the emperor Anthemius relented, and the præfect of Gaul obtained the milder punishment of exile and confiscation. The faults of Arvandus might deserve compassion; but the impunity of Seronatus accused the justice of the republic, till he was condemned and executed, on the complaint of the people of Auvergne. That flagitious minister, the Catiline of his age and country, held a secret correspondence with the Visigoths, to betray the province which he oppressed: his industry was continually exercised in the discovery of new taxes and obsolete offences; and his extravagant vices would have inspired contempt, if they had not excited fear and abhorrence.
One of the last acts of authority that the Roman Senate held over their subjects in Gaul was the trial and sentencing of Arvandus, the Praetorian prefect. Sidonius, who takes joy in having lived during a reign where he could feel pity for and assist a state criminal, has expressed, with compassion and honesty, the mistakes of his indiscreet and unfortunate friend. From the dangers he had escaped, Arvandus took on confidence instead of wisdom; and his varied yet consistently foolish behavior made his success seem much more surprising than his downfall. The second prefecture he obtained within five years undermined the merit and popularity of his previous administration. His easygoing nature was corrupted by flattery and aggravated by opposition; he had to appease his persistent creditors with the province's riches; his unpredictable arrogance offended the nobles of Gaul, and he fell under the weight of public hatred. The order for his disgrace summoned him to defend his actions before the Senate; he crossed the Sea of Tuscany with a favorable wind, which, as he mistakenly thought, was a sign of good fortune ahead. A certain level of respect was still given to the Praefectorian rank; upon his arrival in Rome, Arvandus was placed more under the hospitality than the custody of Flavius Asellus, the count of the sacred largesses, who lived in the Capitol. His accusers, the four deputies from Gaul, eagerly pursued him and were distinguished by their birth, rank, or eloquence. Representing a significant province, they brought a civil and criminal case according to Roman law, seeking restitution for individuals' losses and punishment that would satisfy the state’s justice. Their accusations of corrupt oppression were many and significant; however, they secretly relied on a letter they had intercepted, which they could prove, through the testimony of his secretary, was dictated by Arvandus himself. The author of this letter appeared to discourage the king of the Goths from making peace with the Greek emperor; he suggested a British attack on the Loire; and he proposed dividing Gaul, following international law, between the Visigoths and the Burgundians. These harmful schemes could only be defended by a friend with claims of vanity and indiscretion, but they could be interpreted as treasonable; the deputies cleverly decided not to reveal their most powerful evidence until the decisive moment. But their plans were uncovered by Sidonius's enthusiasm. He quickly informed the unsuspecting criminal of his danger and sincerely lamented, without any anger, Arvandus's arrogant presumption, as he dismissed and even resented the helpful advice from his friends. Unaware of his real situation, Arvandus appeared in the Capitol dressed in the white robe of a candidate, accepted random greetings and offers of service, browsed through the merchants' shops, and looked at the silks and gems, sometimes with the indifference of a bystander and sometimes with the curiosity of a buyer. He complained about the times, the Senate, the prince, and the delays in justice. His complaints were soon addressed. A date was set for his trial, and Arvandus appeared alongside his accusers before a large gathering of the Roman Senate. The sad attire they wore drew the sympathy of the judges, who were shocked by the bright and elegant clothing of their opponent. When Arvandus, the prefect, and the first Gallic deputy were told to take their seats on the senatorial benches, the same contrast of arrogance and humility was evident in their behaviors. In this significant judgment, which vividly reflected the old republic, the Gauls boldly and clearly presented their grievances; and once the audience's feelings were sufficiently roused, they read the damning letter. Arvandus’s stubbornness was based on the odd belief that a subject couldn’t be found guilty of treason unless he had actually plotted to seize power. As the letter was read, he repeatedly, and loudly, acknowledged it as his authentic writing; his shock matched his dismay when the unanimous voice of the Senate declared him guilty of a serious crime. By their decree, he was stripped of his rank as prefect and reduced to the lowly status of a commoner, dragged in shame by servile hands to the public prison. After a two-week delay, the Senate reconvened to pronounce his death sentence; but while he waited on the Island of Æsculapius for the conclusion of the thirty days allowed by an ancient law for the most wicked offenders, his friends intervened, Emperor Anthemius softened, and the prefect of Gaul received the lighter punishment of exile and confiscation. Arvandus’s faults might elicit sympathy; however, the impunity of Seronatus called the fairness of the republic into question until he was condemned and executed, following complaints from the people of Auvergne. That notorious official, the Catiline of his time and place, maintained secret communications with the Visigoths to betray the province he was exploiting: his efforts were constantly aimed at discovering new taxes and outdated offenses; and his extravagant vices would have been met with disdain if they hadn’t inspired fear and loathing.
Such criminals were not beyond the reach of justice; but whatever might be the guilt of Ricimer, that powerful Barbarian was able to contend or to negotiate with the prince, whose alliance he had condescended to accept. The peaceful and prosperous reign which Anthemius had promised to the West, was soon clouded by misfortune and discord. Ricimer, apprehensive, or impatient, of a superior, retired from Rome, and fixed his residence at Milan; an advantageous situation either to invite or to repel the warlike tribes that were seated between the Alps and the Danube. Italy was gradually divided into two independent and hostile kingdoms; and the nobles of Liguria, who trembled at the near approach of a civil war, fell prostrate at the feet of the patrician, and conjured him to spare their unhappy country. "For my own part," replied Ricimer, in a tone of insolent moderation, "I am still inclined to embrace the friendship of the Galatian; but who will undertake to appease his anger, or to mitigate the pride, which always rises in proportion to our submission?" They informed him, that Epiphanius, bishop of Pavia, united the wisdom of the serpent with the innocence of the dove; and appeared confident, that the eloquence of such an ambassador must prevail against the strongest opposition, either of interest or passion. Their recommendation was approved; and Epiphanius, assuming the benevolent office of mediation, proceeded without delay to Rome, where he was received with the honors due to his merit and reputation. The oration of a bishop in favor of peace may be easily supposed; he argued, that, in all possible circumstances, the forgiveness of injuries must be an act of mercy, or magnanimity, or prudence; and he seriously admonished the emperor to avoid a contest with a fierce Barbarian, which might be fatal to himself, and must be ruinous to his dominions. Anthemius acknowledged the truth of his maxims; but he deeply felt, with grief and indignation, the behavior of Ricimer, and his passion gave eloquence and energy to his discourse. "What favors," he warmly exclaimed, "have we refused to this ungrateful man? What provocations have we not endured! Regardless of the majesty of the purple, I gave my daughter to a Goth; I sacrificed my own blood to the safety of the republic. The liberality which ought to have secured the eternal attachment of Ricimer has exasperated him against his benefactor. What wars has he not excited against the empire! How often has he instigated and assisted the fury of hostile nations! Shall I now accept his perfidious friendship? Can I hope that he will respect the engagements of a treaty, who has already violated the duties of a son?" But the anger of Anthemius evaporated in these passionate exclamations: he insensibly yielded to the proposals of Epiphanius; and the bishop returned to his diocese with the satisfaction of restoring the peace of Italy, by a reconciliation, of which the sincerity and continuance might be reasonably suspected. The clemency of the emperor was extorted from his weakness; and Ricimer suspended his ambitious designs till he had secretly prepared the engines with which he resolved to subvert the throne of Anthemius. The mask of peace and moderation was then thrown aside. The army of Ricimer was fortified by a numerous reenforcement of Burgundians and Oriental Suevi: he disclaimed all allegiance to the Greek emperor, marched from Milan to the Gates of Rome, and fixing his camp on the banks of the Anio, impatiently expected the arrival of Olybrius, his Imperial candidate.
Such criminals were still within the reach of justice; however, no matter how guilty Ricimer was, that powerful Barbarian could negotiate with the prince, whose alliance he had agreed to accept. The peaceful and prosperous reign that Anthemius had promised the West was soon overshadowed by misfortune and conflict. Ricimer, either fearful or impatient of a superior, withdrew from Rome and settled in Milan; a strategic location that allowed him to either invite or repel the warring tribes that lived between the Alps and the Danube. Italy gradually split into two independent and enemy kingdoms; and the nobles of Liguria, fearful of a looming civil war, fell to their knees before the patrician and pleaded with him to spare their troubled land. "As for me," Ricimer replied with a tone of arrogant moderation, "I am still inclined to keep the friendship of the Galatian; but who will take on the task of calming his anger, or easing the pride that always rises with our submission?" They informed him that Epiphanius, the bishop of Pavia, combined the cunning of a serpent with the innocence of a dove; and they were confident that the eloquence of such an ambassador would succeed against even the most intense opposition of interest or passion. Their recommendation was accepted; and Epiphanius, taking on the noble role of mediator, promptly headed to Rome, where he was welcomed with the honors fitting his merit and reputation. The speech of a bishop advocating for peace can be easily imagined; he argued that, in any circumstance, forgiving injuries should be seen as an act of mercy, nobility, or wisdom; and he earnestly warned the emperor to avoid contesting with a fierce Barbarian, which could be fatal for him and destructive for his territory. Anthemius acknowledged the truth of his principles; yet he felt deep grief and anger at Ricimer's behavior, which gave passion and strength to his speech. "What favors," he passionately exclaimed, "have we withheld from this ungrateful man? What provocations have we not endured! Ignoring the majesty of the purple, I gave my daughter to a Goth; I sacrificed my own blood for the safety of the republic. The generosity that should have secured Ricimer's lifelong loyalty has instead enraged him against his benefactor. What wars has he not incited against the empire! How often has he fueled and supported the fury of hostile nations! Should I now accept his treacherous friendship? Can I believe he will honor the commitments of a treaty, who has already broken the duties of a son?" But Anthemius's anger subsided after these passionate outbursts: he gradually gave in to Epiphanius's proposals; and the bishop returned to his diocese satisfied with restoring peace in Italy, although the sincerity and durability of this reconciliation could reasonably be questioned. The emperor's mercy was born from his weakness; and Ricimer postponed his ambitious plans until he had secretly prepared the means to overthrow Anthemius's throne. The facade of peace and moderation was then cast aside. Ricimer's army was reinforced by a large number of Burgundians and Eastern Suevi: he renounced all loyalty to the Greek emperor, marched from Milan to the Gates of Rome, and set up camp on the banks of the Anio, eagerly awaiting the arrival of Olybrius, his chosen Imperial candidate.
The senator Olybrius, of the Anician family, might esteem himself the lawful heir of the Western empire. He had married Placidia, the younger daughter of Valentinian, after she was restored by Genseric; who still detained her sister Eudoxia, as the wife, or rather as the captive, of his son. The king of the Vandals supported, by threats and solicitations, the fair pretensions of his Roman ally; and assigned, as one of the motives of the war, the refusal of the senate and people to acknowledge their lawful prince, and the unworthy preference which they had given to a stranger. The friendship of the public enemy might render Olybrius still more unpopular to the Italians; but when Ricimer meditated the ruin of the emperor Anthemius, he tempted, with the offer of a diadem, the candidate who could justify his rebellion by an illustrious name and a royal alliance. The husband of Placidia, who, like most of his ancestors, had been invested with the consular dignity, might have continued to enjoy a secure and splendid fortune in the peaceful residence of Constantinople; nor does he appear to have been tormented by such a genius as cannot be amused or occupied, unless by the administration of an empire. Yet Olybrius yielded to the importunities of his friends, perhaps of his wife; rashly plunged into the dangers and calamities of a civil war; and, with the secret connivance of the emperor Leo, accepted the Italian purple, which was bestowed, and resumed, at the capricious will of a Barbarian. He landed without obstacle (for Genseric was master of the sea) either at Ravenna, or the port of Ostia, and immediately proceeded to the camp of Ricimer, where he was received as the sovereign of the Western world.
The senator Olybrius, from the Anician family, might consider himself the rightful heir to the Western empire. He had married Placidia, the younger daughter of Valentinian, after she was rescued by Genseric, who still held her sister Eudoxia as the wife, or more accurately, as the captive, of his son. The king of the Vandals supported, through threats and persuasion, the legitimate claims of his Roman ally; he cited the refusal of the Senate and people to recognize their rightful prince and the inappropriate preference they showed for a foreigner as one of the reasons for the war. The alliance with the public enemy might have made Olybrius even less popular among the Italians; however, when Ricimer plotted to overthrow Emperor Anthemius, he tempted the candidate who could legitimize his rebellion with a prestigious name and royal connections by offering him a crown. The husband of Placidia, who, like many of his ancestors, had been granted the title of consul, could have enjoyed a secure and luxurious life in the peaceful city of Constantinople; nor does it seem that he was troubled by a spirit that can only be satisfied or occupied through governing an empire. Yet, Olybrius succumbed to the pressures from his friends, possibly his wife; he carelessly dove into the risks and hardships of a civil war; and, with the secret approval of Emperor Leo, he accepted the Italian throne, which could be given or taken away at the whim of a Barbarian. He landed without resistance (as Genseric controlled the sea) either at Ravenna or the port of Ostia, and immediately made his way to Ricimer’s camp, where he was welcomed as the ruler of the Western world.
The patrician, who had extended his posts from the Anio to the Melvian bridge, already possessed two quarters of Rome, the Vatican and the Janiculum, which are separated by the Tyber from the rest of the city; and it may be conjectured, that an assembly of seceding senators imitated, in the choice of Olybrius, the forms of a legal election. But the body of the senate and people firmly adhered to the cause of Anthemius; and the more effectual support of a Gothic army enabled him to prolong his reign, and the public distress, by a resistance of three months, which produced the concomitant evils of famine and pestilence. At length Ricimer made a furious assault on the bridge of Hadrian, or St. Angelo; and the narrow pass was defended with equal valor by the Goths, till the death of Gilimer, their leader. The victorious troops, breaking down every barrier, rushed with irresistible violence into the heart of the city, and Rome (if we may use the language of a contemporary pope) was subverted by the civil fury of Anthemius and Ricimer. The unfortunate Anthemius was dragged from his concealment, and inhumanly massacred by the command of his son-in-law; who thus added a third, or perhaps a fourth, emperor to the number of his victims. The soldiers, who united the rage of factious citizens with the savage manners of Barbarians, were indulged, without control, in the license of rapine and murder: the crowd of slaves and plebeians, who were unconcerned in the event, could only gain by the indiscriminate pillage; and the face of the city exhibited the strange contrast of stern cruelty and dissolute intemperance. Forty days after this calamitous event, the subject, not of glory, but of guilt, Italy was delivered, by a painful disease, from the tyrant Ricimer, who bequeathed the command of his army to his nephew Gundobald, one of the princes of the Burgundians. In the same year all the principal actors in this great revolution were removed from the stage; and the whole reign of Olybrius, whose death does not betray any symptoms of violence, is included within the term of seven months. He left one daughter, the offspring of his marriage with Placidia; and the family of the great Theodosius, transplanted from Spain to Constantinople, was propagated in the female line as far as the eighth generation.
The patrician, who had expanded his influence from the Anio to the Melvian bridge, already controlled two quarters of Rome, the Vatican, and the Janiculum, which are separated by the Tiber from the rest of the city. It can be assumed that a group of senators who had left the Senate mimicked the procedures of a legal election in their choice of Olybrius. However, the majority of the senate and the people strongly supported Anthemius's cause, and the effective backing of a Gothic army allowed him to extend his rule and the public suffering by resisting for three months, which led to the resulting miseries of famine and disease. Eventually, Ricimer launched a fierce attack on the bridge of Hadrian, or St. Angelo; and the narrow passage was defended with equal bravery by the Goths until the death of Gilimer, their leader. The victorious forces, breaking through every obstacle, surged violently into the heart of the city, and Rome (to use the words of a contemporary pope) was devastated by the civil strife between Anthemius and Ricimer. The unfortunate Anthemius was dragged from his hiding place and brutally murdered at the command of his son-in-law, adding a third, or perhaps a fourth, emperor to his list of victims. The soldiers, who combined the anger of contentious citizens with the brutal ways of Barbarians, were given unchecked freedom to plunder and kill. The crowd of slaves and commoners, who were not involved in the conflict, could only benefit from the indiscriminate looting, and the city displayed a bizarre contrast of harsh cruelty and reckless excess. Forty days after this disastrous event, Italy, not as a subject of glory but of shame, was freed from the tyrant Ricimer by a painful illness that he passed on the command of his army to his nephew Gundobald, one of the Burgundian princes. That same year, all the key figures in this major upheaval were removed from power, and Olybrius's entire reign, whose death showed no signs of violence, lasted only seven months. He left behind one daughter from his marriage to Placidia, and the family of the great Theodosius, moved from Spain to Constantinople, continued in the female line for eight generations.
Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part V.
Whilst the vacant throne of Italy was abandoned to lawless Barbarians, the election of a new colleague was seriously agitated in the council of Leo. The empress Verina, studious to promote the greatness of her own family, had married one of her nieces to Julius Nepos, who succeeded his uncle Marcellinus in the sovereignty of Dalmatia, a more solid possession than the title which he was persuaded to accept, of Emperor of the West. But the measures of the Byzantine court were so languid and irresolute, that many months elapsed after the death of Anthemius, and even of Olybrius, before their destined successor could show himself, with a respectable force, to his Italian subjects. During that interval, Glycerius, an obscure soldier, was invested with the purple by his patron Gundobald; but the Burgundian prince was unable, or unwilling, to support his nomination by a civil war: the pursuits of domestic ambition recalled him beyond the Alps, and his client was permitted to exchange the Roman sceptre for the bishopric of Salona. After extinguishing such a competitor, the emperor Nepos was acknowledged by the senate, by the Italians, and by the provincials of Gaul; his moral virtues, and military talents, were loudly celebrated; and those who derived any private benefit from his government, announced, in prophetic strains, the restoration of the public felicity. Their hopes (if such hopes had been entertained) were confounded within the term of a single year, and the treaty of peace, which ceded Auvergne to the Visigoths, is the only event of his short and inglorious reign. The most faithful subjects of Gaul were sacrificed, by the Italian emperor, to the hope of domestic security; but his repose was soon invaded by a furious sedition of the Barbarian confederates, who, under the command of Orestes, their general, were in full march from Rome to Ravenna. Nepos trembled at their approach; and, instead of placing a just confidence in the strength of Ravenna, he hastily escaped to his ships, and retired to his Dalmatian principality, on the opposite coast of the Adriatic. By this shameful abdication, he protracted his life about five years, in a very ambiguous state, between an emperor and an exile, till he was assassinated at Salona by the ungrateful Glycerius, who was translated, perhaps as the reward of his crime, to the archbishopric of Milan.
While the vacant throne of Italy was left to lawless Barbarians, the election of a new ruler was hotly debated in Leo's council. Empress Verina, eager to enhance her family's power, married one of her nieces to Julius Nepos, who took over from his uncle Marcellinus as the ruler of Dalmatia, a more secure position than the title he was convinced to take on, that of Emperor of the West. However, the actions of the Byzantine court were so slow and indecisive that many months passed after the deaths of Anthemius and even Olybrius before their chosen successor could appear with a respectable force to his Italian subjects. During that time, Glycerius, an unknown soldier, was proclaimed emperor by his patron Gundobald; but the Burgundian prince was either unable or unwilling to back his nomination with a civil war: his ambitions pulled him back across the Alps, and Glycerius was allowed to trade the Roman crown for the bishopric of Salona. After removing this rival, the emperor Nepos was recognized by the senate, the Italians, and the provincial subjects in Gaul; his moral character and military skills were widely praised; and those who benefited from his rule proclaimed, in hopeful tones, the return of public happiness. Their hopes (if they truly had any) were dashed within just one year, and the peace treaty that handed Auvergne to the Visigoths is the only notable event of his short and dishonorable reign. The most loyal subjects of Gaul were sacrificed by the Italian emperor for the sake of domestic peace; yet his calm was soon disrupted by a violent uprising of the Barbarian allies, who, led by their general Orestes, marched from Rome to Ravenna. Nepos panicked at their approach; instead of having confidence in the defenses of Ravenna, he quickly fled to his ships and retreated to his Dalmatian principality on the opposite side of the Adriatic. By this shameful abdication, he extended his life for about five years in a very uncertain position, caught between being an emperor and an exile, until he was assassinated at Salona by the ungrateful Glycerius, who was perhaps rewarded for his crime with the archbishopric of Milan.
The nations who had asserted their independence after the death of Attila, were established, by the right of possession or conquest, in the boundless countries to the north of the Danube; or in the Roman provinces between the river and the Alps. But the bravest of their youth enlisted in the army of confederates, who formed the defence and the terror of Italy; and in this promiscuous multitude, the names of the Heruli, the Scyrri, the Alani, the Turcilingi, and the Rugians, appear to have predominated. The example of these warriors was imitated by Orestes, the son of Tatullus, and the father of the last Roman emperor of the West. Orestes, who has been already mentioned in this History, had never deserted his country. His birth and fortunes rendered him one of the most illustrious subjects of Pannonia. When that province was ceded to the Huns, he entered into the service of Attila, his lawful sovereign, obtained the office of his secretary, and was repeatedly sent ambassador to Constantinople, to represent the person, and signify the commands, of the imperious monarch. The death of that conqueror restored him to his freedom; and Orestes might honorably refuse either to follow the sons of Attila into the Scythian desert, or to obey the Ostrogoths, who had usurped the dominion of Pannonia. He preferred the service of the Italian princes, the successors of Valentinian; and as he possessed the qualifications of courage, industry, and experience, he advanced with rapid steps in the military profession, till he was elevated, by the favor of Nepos himself, to the dignities of patrician, and master-general of the troops. These troops had been long accustomed to reverence the character and authority of Orestes, who affected their manners, conversed with them in their own language, and was intimately connected with their national chieftains, by long habits of familiarity and friendship. At his solicitation they rose in arms against the obscure Greek, who presumed to claim their obedience; and when Orestes, from some secret motive, declined the purple, they consented, with the same facility, to acknowledge his son Augustulus as the emperor of the West. By the abdication of Nepos, Orestes had now attained the summit of his ambitious hopes; but he soon discovered, before the end of the first year, that the lessons of perjury and ingratitude, which a rebel must inculcate, will be resorted to against himself; and that the precarious sovereign of Italy was only permitted to choose, whether he would be the slave, or the victim, of his Barbarian mercenaries. The dangerous alliance of these strangers had oppressed and insulted the last remains of Roman freedom and dignity. At each revolution, their pay and privileges were augmented; but their insolence increased in a still more extravagant degree; they envied the fortune of their brethren in Gaul, Spain, and Africa, whose victorious arms had acquired an independent and perpetual inheritance; and they insisted on their peremptory demand, that a third part of the lands of Italy should be immediately divided among them. Orestes, with a spirit, which, in another situation, might be entitled to our esteem, chose rather to encounter the rage of an armed multitude, than to subscribe the ruin of an innocent people. He rejected the audacious demand; and his refusal was favorable to the ambition of Odoacer; a bold Barbarian, who assured his fellow-soldiers, that, if they dared to associate under his command, they might soon extort the justice which had been denied to their dutiful petitions. From all the camps and garrisons of Italy, the confederates, actuated by the same resentment and the same hopes, impatiently flocked to the standard of this popular leader; and the unfortunate patrician, overwhelmed by the torrent, hastily retreated to the strong city of Pavia, the episcopal seat of the holy Epiphanites. Pavia was immediately besieged, the fortifications were stormed, the town was pillaged; and although the bishop might labor, with much zeal and some success, to save the property of the church, and the chastity of female captives, the tumult could only be appeased by the execution of Orestes. His brother Paul was slain in an action near Ravenna; and the helpless Augustulus, who could no longer command the respect, was reduced to implore the clemency, of Odoacer.
The nations that had claimed independence after Attila's death established themselves in the vast lands north of the Danube or in the Roman provinces between the river and the Alps. The bravest of their youth joined the army of the confederates, who became both the defense and fear of Italy; among this diverse group, the Heruli, the Scyrri, the Alani, the Turcilingi, and the Rugians were particularly prominent. Orestes, the son of Tatullus and the father of the last Roman emperor of the West, followed the example of these warriors. Orestes, already mentioned in this history, never abandoned his homeland. Born into prominent circumstances, he was one of the most notable figures from Pannonia. When that province was ceded to the Huns, he entered the service of Attila, his rightful ruler, became his secretary, and was frequently sent as ambassador to Constantinople to represent the powerful monarch and relay his commands. Attila's death restored Orestes’s freedom, allowing him to refuse to follow Attila's sons into the Scythian desert or to obey the Ostrogoths, who had taken control of Pannonia. He chose to serve the Italian princes, the successors of Valentinian, and with his skills in courage, hard work, and experience, he quickly rose through the military ranks until Nepos himself elevated him to the positions of patrician and master-general of the troops. These troops had long respected Orestes's character and authority; he adopted their ways, spoke their language, and built strong connections with their national leaders through years of familiarity and friendship. At his urging, they took up arms against the obscure Greek who dared to demand their loyalty; when Orestes, for some hidden reason, declined the title of emperor, they readily accepted his son Augustulus as the emperor of the West. With Nepos's abdication, Orestes reached the peak of his ambitions, but soon realized, within the first year, that the lessons of betrayal and ingratitude taught by a rebel would eventually turn against him, and that the unstable ruler of Italy was left to choose between being a slave or a victim of his barbarian mercenaries. The dangerous alliance with these outsiders had diminished the last vestiges of Roman freedom and dignity. With each turn of events, their pay and privileges increased, but so did their arrogance; they envied the fortunes of their counterparts in Gaul, Spain, and Africa, whose victorious arms had secured an independent and lasting legacy, and they made an unequivocal demand for a third of Italy's lands to be immediately allocated to them. Orestes, displaying a spirit that, under different circumstances, might earn our respect, chose to face the fury of an armed mob rather than accept the downfall of innocent people. He rejected their bold demand, and his refusal played into the hands of Odoacer, a daring barbarian, who convinced his fellow soldiers that if they rallied under his leadership, they could soon secure the justice their demands had been denied. From camps and garrisons across Italy, the confederates, driven by shared resentment and hope, eagerly flocked to this popular leader's banner; the ill-fated patrician, overwhelmed by the wave of dissent, quickly retreated to the strong city of Pavia, the home of the holy Epiphanites. Pavia was immediately besieged, its defenses breached, and the town was pillaged; even though the bishop worked diligently and with some success to protect the church's property and the dignity of female captives, the chaos could only be calmed by Orestes's execution. His brother Paul was killed in a battle near Ravenna, and the helpless Augustulus, who could no longer command respect, was reduced to begging for mercy from Odoacer.
That successful Barbarian was the son of Edecon; who, in some remarkable transactions, particularly described in a preceding chapter, had been the colleague of Orestes himself. The honor of an ambassador should be exempt from suspicion; and Edecon had listened to a conspiracy against the life of his sovereign. But this apparent guilt was expiated by his merit or repentance; his rank was eminent and conspicuous; he enjoyed the favor of Attila; and the troops under his command, who guarded, in their turn, the royal village, consisted of a tribe of Scyrri, his immediate and hereditary subjects. In the revolt of the nations, they still adhered to the Huns; and more than twelve years afterwards, the name of Edecon is honorably mentioned, in their unequal contests with the Ostrogoths; which was terminated, after two bloody battles, by the defeat and dispersion of the Scyrri. Their gallant leader, who did not survive this national calamity, left two sons, Onulf and Odoacer, to struggle with adversity, and to maintain as they might, by rapine or service, the faithful followers of their exile. Onulf directed his steps towards Constantinople, where he sullied, by the assassination of a generous benefactor, the fame which he had acquired in arms. His brother Odoacer led a wandering life among the Barbarians of Noricum, with a mind and a fortune suited to the most desperate adventures; and when he had fixed his choice, he piously visited the cell of Severinus, the popular saint of the country, to solicit his approbation and blessing. The lowness of the door would not admit the lofty stature of Odoacer: he was obliged to stoop; but in that humble attitude the saint could discern the symptoms of his future greatness; and addressing him in a prophetic tone, "Pursue" (said he) "your design; proceed to Italy; you will soon cast away this coarse garment of skins; and your wealth will be adequate to the liberality of your mind." The Barbarian, whose daring spirit accepted and ratified the prediction, was admitted into the service of the Western empire, and soon obtained an honorable rank in the guards. His manners were gradually polished, his military skill was improved, and the confederates of Italy would not have elected him for their general, unless the exploits of Odoacer had established a high opinion of his courage and capacity. Their military acclamations saluted him with the title of king; but he abstained, during his whole reign, from the use of the purple and diadem, lest he should offend those princes, whose subjects, by their accidental mixture, had formed the victorious army, which time and policy might insensibly unite into a great nation.
That successful Barbarian was the son of Edecon, who, in some remarkable events described in an earlier chapter, had been an associate of Orestes himself. The role of an ambassador should be beyond suspicion, yet Edecon had been aware of a plot against his sovereign's life. However, this apparent wrongdoing was offset by his merits or his remorse; his status was notable and prominent; he had the favor of Attila, and the troops he commanded, who also protected the royal village, were made up of a tribe of Scyrri, his immediate and hereditary subjects. During the nations' revolt, they remained loyal to the Huns, and even more than twelve years later, Edecon's name is honorably mentioned in their unequal struggles against the Ostrogoths, which ended, after two bloody battles, in the defeat and scattering of the Scyrri. Their brave leader, who did not survive this national tragedy, left behind two sons, Onulf and Odoacer, who were left to face hardship and to support, however they could, the loyal followers of their exile. Onulf headed towards Constantinople, where he tarnished his reputation gained in battle by assassinating a generous benefactor. His brother Odoacer lived a nomadic life among the Barbarians of Noricum, possessing both the mindset and fortune suited for the most perilous adventures; and when he made his choice, he reverently visited the cell of Severinus, the beloved saint of the region, to seek his approval and blessing. The low doorway wouldn’t accommodate Odoacer’s tall stature, forcing him to stoop; yet in that humble posture, the saint recognized signs of his future greatness and spoke to him prophetically, saying, "Pursue your plan; go to Italy; you will soon discard this rough skin garment; and your wealth will match the generosity of your spirit." The Barbarian, whose bold nature embraced and confirmed the prophecy, was taken into the service of the Western empire and quickly earned an honorable position in the guards. His manners gradually refined, his military skills improved, and the allies of Italy would not have chosen him as their general unless Odoacer's achievements had established a strong reputation for his bravery and capability. The soldiers hailed him with the title of king, but throughout his reign, he refrained from donning the purple robe and crown, so as not to offend those princes whose subjects, through their accidental mingling, had formed the victorious army, which time and strategy might gradually unify into a great nation.
Royalty was familiar to the Barbarians, and the submissive people of Italy was prepared to obey, without a murmur, the authority which he should condescend to exercise as the vicegerent of the emperor of the West. But Odoacer had resolved to abolish that useless and expensive office; and such is the weight of antique prejudice, that it required some boldness and penetration to discover the extreme facility of the enterprise. The unfortunate Augustulus was made the instrument of his own disgrace: he signified his resignation to the senate; and that assembly, in their last act of obedience to a Roman prince, still affected the spirit of freedom, and the forms of the constitution. An epistle was addressed, by their unanimous decree, to the emperor Zeno, the son-in-law and successor of Leo; who had lately been restored, after a short rebellion, to the Byzantine throne. They solemnly "disclaim the necessity, or even the wish, of continuing any longer the Imperial succession in Italy; since, in their opinion, the majesty of a sole monarch is sufficient to pervade and protect, at the same time, both the East and the West. In their own name, and in the name of the people, they consent that the seat of universal empire shall be transferred from Rome to Constantinople; and they basely renounce the right of choosing their master, the only vestige that yet remained of the authority which had given laws to the world. The republic (they repeat that name without a blush) might safely confide in the civil and military virtues of Odoacer; and they humbly request, that the emperor would invest him with the title of Patrician, and the administration of the diocese of Italy." The deputies of the senate were received at Constantinople with some marks of displeasure and indignation: and when they were admitted to the audience of Zeno, he sternly reproached them with their treatment of the two emperors, Anthemius and Nepos, whom the East had successively granted to the prayers of Italy. "The first" (continued he) "you have murdered; the second you have expelled; but the second is still alive, and whilst he lives he is your lawful sovereign." But the prudent Zeno soon deserted the hopeless cause of his abdicated colleague. His vanity was gratified by the title of sole emperor, and by the statues erected to his honor in the several quarters of Rome; he entertained a friendly, though ambiguous, correspondence with the patrician Odoacer; and he gratefully accepted the Imperial ensigns, the sacred ornaments of the throne and palace, which the Barbarian was not unwilling to remove from the sight of the people.
Royalty was well-known to the Barbarians, and the submissive people of Italy were ready to obey, without complaint, the authority Odoacer decided to exercise as the representative of the emperor of the West. However, Odoacer had made up his mind to eliminate that unnecessary and costly position; and the weight of old beliefs required some boldness and insight to realize how easy this task would be. The unfortunate Augustulus became the instrument of his own downfall: he announced his resignation to the senate, and that assembly, in their final act of loyalty to a Roman prince, still tried to maintain the spirit of freedom and the forms of the constitution. They sent a letter, by their unanimous decision, to Emperor Zeno, the son-in-law and successor of Leo, who had recently been restored to the Byzantine throne after a brief rebellion. They formally "disclaim the necessity, or even the desire, to continue the Imperial succession in Italy any longer; as they believe the authority of a single monarch is enough to oversee and protect both the East and the West. On their own behalf, and on behalf of the people, they agree that the center of universal empire should be transferred from Rome to Constantinople; and they shamefully renounce the right to choose their ruler, the last remnant of the authority that once legislated for the world. The republic (they mention that name without any shame) can safely rely on the civil and military virtues of Odoacer; and they humbly request that the emperor give him the title of Patrician and the administration of the diocese of Italy." The senate's representatives were received in Constantinople with some signs of discontent and outrage: and when they met with Zeno, he sternly rebuked them for their treatment of the two emperors, Anthemius and Nepos, whom the East had successively granted to Italy’s requests. "You have murdered the first" (he continued) "and expelled the second; but the second is still alive, and as long as he lives, he is your legitimate ruler." However, the shrewd Zeno quickly abandoned the hopeless cause of his ousted colleague. His vanity was satisfied by the title of sole emperor and by the statues erected in his honor across different parts of Rome; he maintained a friendly, though unclear, correspondence with the patrician Odoacer; and he gratefully accepted the Imperial insignia, the sacred symbols of the throne and palace, which the Barbarian was willing to remove from the view of the people.
In the space of twenty years since the death of Valentinian, nine emperors had successively disappeared; and the son of Orestes, a youth recommended only by his beauty, would be the least entitled to the notice of posterity, if his reign, which was marked by the extinction of the Roman empire in the West, did not leave a memorable era in the history of mankind. The patrician Orestes had married the daughter of Count Romulus, of Petovio in Noricum: the name of Augustus, notwithstanding the jealousy of power, was known at Aquileia as a familiar surname; and the appellations of the two great founders, of the city and of the monarchy, were thus strangely united in the last of their successors. The son of Orestes assumed and disgraced the names of Romulus Augustus; but the first was corrupted into Momyllus, by the Greeks, and the second has been changed by the Latins into the contemptible diminutive Augustulus. The life of this inoffensive youth was spared by the generous clemency of Odoacer; who dismissed him, with his whole family, from the Imperial palace, fixed his annual allowance at six thousand pieces of gold, and assigned the castle of Lucullus, in Campania, for the place of his exile or retirement. As soon as the Romans breathed from the toils of the Punic war, they were attracted by the beauties and the pleasures of Campania; and the country-house of the elder Scipio at Liternum exhibited a lasting model of their rustic simplicity. The delicious shores of the Bay of Naples were crowded with villas; and Sylla applauded the masterly skill of his rival, who had seated himself on the lofty promontory of Misenum, that commands, on every side, the sea and land, as far as the boundaries of the horizon. The villa of Marius was purchased, within a few years, by Lucullus, and the price had increased from two thousand five hundred, to more than fourscore thousand, pounds sterling. It was adorned by the new proprietor with Grecian arts and Asiatic treasures; and the houses and gardens of Lucullus obtained a distinguished rank in the list of Imperial palaces. When the Vandals became formidable to the sea-coast, the Lucullan villa, on the promontory of Misenum, gradually assumed the strength and appellation of a strong castle, the obscure retreat of the last emperor of the West. About twenty years after that great revolution, it was converted into a church and monastery, to receive the bones of St. Severinus. They securely reposed, amidst the broken trophies of Cimbric and Armenian victories, till the beginning of the tenth century; when the fortifications, which might afford a dangerous shelter to the Saracens, were demolished by the people of Naples.
In the twenty years following Valentinian's death, nine emperors had come and gone. The son of Orestes, a young man known only for his looks, would likely be the least remembered by history had his reign, which marked the fall of the Western Roman Empire, not left a significant chapter in human history. Orestes, a patrician, had married the daughter of Count Romulus from Petovio in Noricum. Despite the rivalry for power, the name Augustus was common in Aquileia; thus, the names of the city's and the monarchy's founders were oddly linked in the last of their descendants. Orestes' son took on the name Romulus Augustus but was mockingly called Momyllus by the Greeks, and the Latins turned it into the trivial nickname Augustulus. This gentle young man was spared by the generous mercy of Odoacer, who released him and his family from the Imperial palace, set his annual allowance at six thousand gold coins, and assigned him the castle of Lucullus in Campania as his place of exile or retirement. Once the Romans recovered from the Punic War, they were drawn to the beauty and pleasures of Campania, and the country house of the older Scipio at Liternum served as a lasting example of rustic simplicity. The lovely shores of the Bay of Naples were filled with villas, and Sylla admired his rival's skill, who had perched on the high promontory of Misenum, overlooking both sea and land as far as the horizon. Within a few years, the villa of Marius was bought by Lucullus, with the price rising from two thousand five hundred to over eighty thousand pounds sterling. The new owner adorned it with Greek art and Asian treasures, elevating Lucullus's houses and gardens to a distinguished position among Imperial palaces. As the Vandals became a threat to the coast, the Lucullan villa on the Misenum promontory gradually transformed into a stronghold, the hidden refuge of the last emperor of the West. About twenty years after this major shift, it was turned into a church and monastery to house the remains of St. Severinus. They rested safely among the remnants of Cimbric and Armenian victories until the early tenth century when the fortifications, which could pose a threat to the Saracens, were torn down by the people of Naples.
Odoacer was the first Barbarian who reigned in Italy, over a people who had once asserted their just superiority above the rest of mankind. The disgrace of the Romans still excites our respectful compassion, and we fondly sympathize with the imaginary grief and indignation of their degenerate posterity. But the calamities of Italy had gradually subdued the proud consciousness of freedom and glory. In the age of Roman virtue the provinces were subject to the arms, and the citizens to the laws, of the republic; till those laws were subverted by civil discord, and both the city and the province became the servile property of a tyrant. The forms of the constitution, which alleviated or disguised their abject slavery, were abolished by time and violence; the Italians alternately lamented the presence or the absence of the sovereign, whom they detested or despised; and the succession of five centuries inflicted the various evils of military license, capricious despotism, and elaborate oppression. During the same period, the Barbarians had emerged from obscurity and contempt, and the warriors of Germany and Scythia were introduced into the provinces, as the servants, the allies, and at length the masters, of the Romans, whom they insulted or protected. The hatred of the people was suppressed by fear; they respected the spirit and splendor of the martial chiefs who were invested with the honors of the empire; and the fate of Rome had long depended on the sword of those formidable strangers. The stern Ricimer, who trampled on the ruins of Italy, had exercised the power, without assuming the title, of a king; and the patient Romans were insensibly prepared to acknowledge the royalty of Odoacer and his Barbaric successors.
Odoacer was the first barbarian to rule in Italy, over a people who had once claimed their rightful superiority over the rest of humanity. The disgrace of the Romans still evokes our respectful sympathy, and we empathize with the imagined sorrow and anger of their degenerate descendants. However, the troubles of Italy gradually diminished the proud sense of freedom and glory. In the era of Roman virtue, the provinces were subject to the military, and the citizens to the laws, of the republic; until those laws were overturned by internal conflict, making both the city and the province the subjugated property of a tyrant. The structures of the constitution, which eased or masked their abject slavery, were eradicated by time and violence; the Italians alternately mourned the presence or absence of the ruler they both loathed and disdained; and the succession of five centuries brought various hardships of military rule, arbitrary tyranny, and intricate oppression. During this same period, the barbarians emerged from obscurity and scorn, with warriors from Germany and Scythia being introduced into the provinces as servants, allies, and eventually masters of the Romans, whom they either insulted or protected. The people's hatred was subdued by fear; they respected the spirit and grandeur of the martial leaders who held the honors of the empire; and the fate of Rome had long depended on the swords of those formidable outsiders. The stern Ricimer, who trampled on the remnants of Italy, wielded power without taking on the title of king; and the patient Romans gradually became ready to accept the kingship of Odoacer and his barbarian successors.
The king of Italy was not unworthy of the high station to which his valor and fortune had exalted him: his savage manners were polished by the habits of conversation; and he respected, though a conqueror and a Barbarian, the institutions, and even the prejudices, of his subjects. After an interval of seven years, Odoacer restored the consulship of the West. For himself, he modestly, or proudly, declined an honor which was still accepted by the emperors of the East; but the curule chair was successively filled by eleven of the most illustrious senators; and the list is adorned by the respectable name of Basilius, whose virtues claimed the friendship and grateful applause of Sidonius, his client. The laws of the emperors were strictly enforced, and the civil administration of Italy was still exercised by the Prætorian præfect and his subordinate officers. Odoacer devolved on the Roman magistrates the odious and oppressive task of collecting the public revenue; but he reserved for himself the merit of seasonable and popular indulgence. Like the rest of the Barbarians, he had been instructed in the Arian heresy; but he revered the monastic and episcopal characters; and the silence of the Catholics attest the toleration which they enjoyed. The peace of the city required the interposition of his præfect Basilius in the choice of a Roman pontiff: the decree which restrained the clergy from alienating their lands was ultimately designed for the benefit of the people, whose devotions would have been taxed to repair the dilapidations of the church. Italy was protected by the arms of its conqueror; and its frontiers were respected by the Barbarians of Gaul and Germany, who had so long insulted the feeble race of Theodosius. Odoacer passed the Adriatic, to chastise the assassins of the emperor Nepos, and to acquire the maritime province of Dalmatia. He passed the Alps, to rescue the remains of Noricum from Fava, or Feletheus, king of the Rugians, who held his residence beyond the Danube. The king was vanquished in battle, and led away prisoner; a numerous colony of captives and subjects was transplanted into Italy; and Rome, after a long period of defeat and disgrace, might claim the triumph of her Barbarian master.
The king of Italy was deserving of the high position that his bravery and luck had brought him: his rough manners were refined by social interactions, and even as a conqueror and a Barbarian, he respected the customs and even the biases of his people. After seven years, Odoacer restored the consulship of the West. He modestly, or perhaps proudly, declined an honor that was still accepted by the emperors of the East; however, the curule chair was successively filled by eleven of the most distinguished senators, including the respected Basilius, whose virtues earned the friendship and gratitude of Sidonius, his supporter. The laws of the emperors were rigorously enforced, and civil administration in Italy continued under the Prætorian præfect and his subordinate officers. Odoacer handed over the loathed and burdensome task of collecting public revenue to the Roman magistrates but kept the credit for timely and popular leniency for himself. Like other Barbarians, he had been taught the Arian heresy but held the monastic and episcopal figures in high regard; the quietude of the Catholics indicates the tolerance they experienced. The peace of the city needed the intervention of his præfect Basilius in selecting a Roman pontiff: the decree that prevented the clergy from selling their lands was ultimately meant to benefit the people, who would have been taxed to repair church damages. Italy was protected by its conqueror’s military, and its borders were respected by the Barbarians of Gaul and Germany, who had long tormented the weak descendants of Theodosius. Odoacer crossed the Adriatic to punish the killers of Emperor Nepos and to take control of the coastal region of Dalmatia. He crossed the Alps to save the remnants of Noricum from Fava, or Feletheus, the king of the Rugians, who lived beyond the Danube. The king was defeated in battle and taken prisoner; a large colony of captives and subjects was moved to Italy; and Rome, after a long period of defeat and shame, could finally claim the victory of its Barbarian ruler.
Notwithstanding the prudence and success of Odoacer, his kingdom exhibited the sad prospect of misery and desolation. Since the age of Tiberius, the decay of agriculture had been felt in Italy; and it was a just subject of complaint, that the life of the Roman people depended on the accidents of the winds and waves. In the division and the decline of the empire, the tributary harvests of Egypt and Africa were withdrawn; the numbers of the inhabitants continually diminished with the means of subsistence; and the country was exhausted by the irretrievable losses of war, famine, and pestilence. St. Ambrose has deplored the ruin of a populous district, which had been once adorned with the flourishing cities of Bologna, Modena, Regium, and Placentia. Pope Gelasius was a subject of Odoacer; and he affirms, with strong exaggeration, that in Æmilia, Tuscany, and the adjacent provinces, the human species was almost extirpated. The plebeians of Rome, who were fed by the hand of their master, perished or disappeared, as soon as his liberality was suppressed; the decline of the arts reduced the industrious mechanic to idleness and want; and the senators, who might support with patience the ruin of their country, bewailed their private loss of wealth and luxury. One third of those ample estates, to which the ruin of Italy is originally imputed, was extorted for the use of the conquerors. Injuries were aggravated by insults; the sense of actual sufferings was imbittered by the fear of more dreadful evils; and as new lands were allotted to the new swarms of Barbarians, each senator was apprehensive lest the arbitrary surveyors should approach his favorite villa, or his most profitable farm. The least unfortunate were those who submitted without a murmur to the power which it was impossible to resist. Since they desired to live, they owed some gratitude to the tyrant who had spared their lives; and since he was the absolute master of their fortunes, the portion which he left must be accepted as his pure and voluntary gift. The distress of Italy was mitigated by the prudence and humanity of Odoacer, who had bound himself, as the price of his elevation, to satisfy the demands of a licentious and turbulent multitude. The kings of the Barbarians were frequently resisted, deposed, or murdered, by their native subjects, and the various bands of Italian mercenaries, who associated under the standard of an elective general, claimed a larger privilege of freedom and rapine. A monarchy destitute of national union, and hereditary right, hastened to its dissolution. After a reign of fourteen years, Odoacer was oppressed by the superior genius of Theodoric, king of the Ostrogoths; a hero alike excellent in the arts of war and of government, who restored an age of peace and prosperity, and whose name still excites and deserves the attention of mankind.
Despite Odoacer's careful leadership and success, his kingdom faced a grim future of suffering and ruin. Since Tiberius's time, Italian agriculture had declined, and it was a valid complaint that the Roman people's survival relied on the unpredictable winds and waves. As the empire fractured and weakened, the vital harvests from Egypt and Africa were lost; the population constantly shrank while resources dwindled, and the land was drained by the irreversible impacts of war, famine, and disease. St. Ambrose mourned the destruction of once-thriving areas that had boasted cities like Bologna, Modena, Regium, and Placentia. Pope Gelasius, an underling of Odoacer, claimed—perhaps exaggerating—that in Æmilia, Tuscany, and surrounding regions, humanity was nearly wiped out. The common people of Rome, who depended on their leaders for food, either perished or vanished as soon as his generosity ceased; the decline of arts reduced skilled workers to unemployment and poverty, while senators, who could bear the collapse of their country with patience, lamented their personal losses of wealth and luxury. One third of the vast estates, which were initially blamed for Italy's downfall, was seized for the conquerors' benefit. Outrage was worsened by insults; the awareness of current hardships was soured by the fear of even worse misfortunes. As new lands were given to incoming hordes of Barbarians, each senator feared that the arbitrary officials would encroach upon their cherished villas or most lucrative farms. The least unfortunate were those who accepted their fate without protest against an overpowering force. Since they wished to survive, they felt some gratitude towards the tyrant who spared their lives; and since he had complete control over their fortunes, the share he allowed them had to be seen as a genuine and voluntary gift. Odoacer eased Italy's distress with his wisdom and compassion, having committed, as part of his rise to power, to meet the demands of a reckless and unruly crowd. Barbarian kings often faced resistance, deposition, or assassination at the hands of their own people, while various groups of Italian mercenaries, united under an elected general, claimed greater rights to freedom and plunder. A monarchy lacking national unity and hereditary legitimacy rushed toward its collapse. After fourteen years of rule, Odoacer was defeated by the superior talents of Theodoric, king of the Ostrogoths—a remarkable hero in both warfare and governance—who brought about a new era of peace and prosperity, and whose name still garners the attention and respect of the world.
Chapter XXXVII: Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity.—Part I.
Origin Progress, And Effects Of The Monastic Life.— Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity And Arianism.— Persecution Of The Vandals In Africa.—Extinction Of Arianism Among The Barbarians.
Origin, Progress, and Effects of Monastic Life.— Conversion of Barbarians to Christianity and Arianism.— Persecution of the Vandals in Africa.—Extinction of Arianism Among the Barbarians.
The indissoluble connection of civil and ecclesiastical affairs has compelled, and encouraged, me to relate the progress, the persecutions, the establishment, the divisions, the final triumph, and the gradual corruption, of Christianity. I have purposely delayed the consideration of two religious events, interesting in the study of human nature, and important in the decline and fall of the Roman empire. I. The institution of the monastic life; and, II. The conversion of the northern Barbarians.
The unbreakable link between civil and church matters has driven me to share the journey, the struggles, the establishment, the splits, the eventual success, and the gradual decline of Christianity. I've intentionally put off discussing two religious events that are fascinating for understanding human nature and significant in the decline and fall of the Roman Empire: I. The establishment of monastic life; and II. The conversion of the northern Barbarians.
I. Prosperity and peace introduced the distinction of the vulgar and the Ascetic Christians. The loose and imperfect practice of religion satisfied the conscience of the multitude. The prince or magistrate, the soldier or merchant, reconciled their fervent zeal, and implicit faith, with the exercise of their profession, the pursuit of their interest, and the indulgence of their passions: but the Ascetics, who obeyed and abused the rigid precepts of the gospel, were inspired by the savage enthusiasm which represents man as a criminal, and God as a tyrant. They seriously renounced the business, and the pleasures, of the age; abjured the use of wine, of flesh, and of marriage; chastised their body, mortified their affections, and embraced a life of misery, as the price of eternal happiness. In the reign of Constantine, the Ascetics fled from a profane and degenerate world, to perpetual solitude, or religious society. Like the first Christians of Jerusalem, they resigned the use, or the property of their temporal possessions; established regular communities of the same sex, and a similar disposition; and assumed the names of Hermits, Monks, and Anachorets, expressive of their lonely retreat in a natural or artificial desert. They soon acquired the respect of the world, which they despised; and the loudest applause was bestowed on this Divine Philosophy, which surpassed, without the aid of science or reason, the laborious virtues of the Grecian schools. The monks might indeed contend with the Stoics, in the contempt of fortune, of pain, and of death: the Pythagorean silence and submission were revived in their servile discipline; and they disdained, as firmly as the Cynics themselves, all the forms and decencies of civil society. But the votaries of this Divine Philosophy aspired to imitate a purer and more perfect model. They trod in the footsteps of the prophets, who had retired to the desert; and they restored the devout and contemplative life, which had been instituted by the Essenians, in Palestine and Egypt. The philosophic eye of Pliny had surveyed with astonishment a solitary people, who dwelt among the palm-trees near the Dead Sea; who subsisted without money, who were propagated without women; and who derived from the disgust and repentance of mankind a perpetual supply of voluntary associates.
I. Prosperity and peace brought about the distinction between the common people and the Ascetic Christians. The casual and imperfect practice of religion was enough to satisfy the conscience of the masses. The prince or magistrate, the soldier or merchant, balanced their passionate devotion and unquestioning faith with their work, personal interests, and indulgence in their desires; however, the Ascetics, who followed and often misinterpreted the strict teachings of the gospel, were driven by a fierce enthusiasm that viewed humanity as sinful and God as oppressive. They seriously renounced the activities and pleasures of their time; rejected the use of wine, meat, and marriage; punished their bodies, suppressed their feelings, and chose a life of hardship in exchange for eternal happiness. During Constantine's reign, the Ascetics withdrew from a corrupt and declining society to live in solitude or religious communities. Like the early Christians in Jerusalem, they gave up the use and ownership of their material possessions; established organized groups of people of the same gender and mindset; and took on names like Hermits, Monks, and Anachorets, reflecting their solitary lives in natural or man-made deserts. They quickly gained the respect of the society they looked down upon; the loudest praise was given to this Divine Philosophy, which surpassed, without the support of science or reason, the strenuous virtues of Grecian philosophy. The monks could certainly challenge the Stoics in their disregard for fortune, pain, and death: the silence and submission of the Pythagoreans were revived in their strict discipline; and they rejected, as firmly as the Cynics, all the conventions and norms of civil society. But the followers of this Divine Philosophy aimed to emulate a purer and more perfect example. They followed the path of the prophets who had gone into the desert; and they revived the devout and contemplative lifestyle that had been established by the Essenes in Palestine and Egypt. The observant eye of Pliny marveled at a solitary community living among the palm trees near the Dead Sea; they thrived without money, reproduced without women, and drew from the disgust and regret of humanity a constant influx of willing newcomers.
Egypt, the fruitful parent of superstition, afforded the first example of the monastic life. Antony, an illiterate youth of the lower parts of Thebais, distributed his patrimony, deserted his family and native home, and executed his monastic penance with original and intrepid fanaticism. After a long and painful novitiate, among the tombs, and in a ruined tower, he boldly advanced into the desert three days' journey to the eastward of the Nile; discovered a lonely spot, which possessed the advantages of shade and water, and fixed his last residence on Mount Colzim, near the Red Sea; where an ancient monastery still preserves the name and memory of the saint. The curious devotion of the Christians pursued him to the desert; and when he was obliged to appear at Alexandria, in the face of mankind, he supported his fame with discretion and dignity. He enjoyed the friendship of Athanasius, whose doctrine he approved; and the Egyptian peasant respectfully declined a respectful invitation from the emperor Constantine. The venerable patriarch (for Antony attained the age of one hundred and five years) beheld the numerous progeny which had been formed by his example and his lessons. The prolific colonies of monks multiplied with rapid increase on the sands of Libya, upon the rocks of Thebais, and in the cities of the Nile. To the south of Alexandria, the mountain, and adjacent desert, of Nitria, were peopled by five thousand anachorets; and the traveller may still investigate the ruins of fifty monasteries, which were planted in that barren soil by the disciples of Antony. In the Upper Thebais, the vacant island of Tabenne, was occupied by Pachomius and fourteen hundred of his brethren. That holy abbot successively founded nine monasteries of men, and one of women; and the festival of Easter sometimes collected fifty thousand religious persons, who followed his angelic rule of discipline. The stately and populous city of Oxyrinchus, the seat of Christian orthodoxy, had devoted the temples, the public edifices, and even the ramparts, to pious and charitable uses; and the bishop, who might preach in twelve churches, computed ten thousand females and twenty thousand males, of the monastic profession. The Egyptians, who gloried in this marvellous revolution, were disposed to hope, and to believe, that the number of the monks was equal to the remainder of the people; and posterity might repeat the saying, which had formerly been applied to the sacred animals of the same country, That in Egypt it was less difficult to find a god than a man.
Egypt, the fertile origin of superstition, provided the first example of the monastic life. Antony, an uneducated young man from the lower parts of Thebais, gave away his inheritance, left his family and hometown, and practiced his monastic penance with unique and bold fervor. After a long and difficult period of training among the tombs and in a dilapidated tower, he bravely ventured three days’ journey into the desert to the east of the Nile, found a remote location that had shade and water, and settled on Mount Colzim, near the Red Sea, where an ancient monastery still honors his name and memory. Curious Christians followed him into the desert, and when he had to appear in Alexandria, he maintained his reputation with wisdom and grace. He enjoyed a friendship with Athanasius, whose teachings he supported, and the Egyptian peasant politely declined a respectful invitation from Emperor Constantine. The venerable patriarch (Antony lived to be one hundred and five years old) witnessed the numerous followers that his example and teachings inspired. The thriving communities of monks grew rapidly across the sands of Libya, on the rocks of Thebais, and in the cities along the Nile. South of Alexandria, the mountains and adjacent desert of Nitria were home to five thousand ascetics; and travelers can still explore the ruins of fifty monasteries established in that harsh land by Antony's disciples. In Upper Thebais, the uninhabited island of Tabenne was settled by Pachomius and fourteen hundred of his brothers. That holy abbot went on to establish nine monasteries for men and one for women; during Easter celebrations, up to fifty thousand followers gathered to observe his angelic rule of discipline. The grand and bustling city of Oxyrinchus, a center of Christian orthodoxy, had repurposed its temples, public buildings, and even its walls for pious and charitable activities; the bishop, who could preach in twelve churches, reported ten thousand women and twenty thousand men in the monastic lifestyle. The Egyptians, who took pride in this remarkable transformation, were eager to believe that the number of monks rivaled the rest of the population; future generations might echo the saying once used for the sacred animals of the same land: that in Egypt, it was easier to find a god than a man.
Athanasius introduced into Rome the knowledge and practice of the monastic life; and a school of this new philosophy was opened by the disciples of Antony, who accompanied their primate to the holy threshold of the Vatican. The strange and savage appearance of these Egyptians excited, at first, horror and contempt, and, at length, applause and zealous imitation. The senators, and more especially the matrons, transformed their palaces and villas into religious houses; and the narrow institution of six Vestals was eclipsed by the frequent monasteries, which were seated on the ruins of ancient temples, and in the midst of the Roman forum. Inflamed by the example of Antony, a Syrian youth, whose name was Hilarion, fixed his dreary abode on a sandy beach, between the sea and a morass, about seven miles from Gaza. The austere penance, in which he persisted forty-eight years, diffused a similar enthusiasm; and the holy man was followed by a train of two or three thousand anachorets, whenever he visited the innumerable monasteries of Palestine. The fame of Basil is immortal in the monastic history of the East. With a mind that had tasted the learning and eloquence of Athens; with an ambition scarcely to be satisfied with the archbishopric of Cæsarea, Basil retired to a savage solitude in Pontus; and deigned, for a while, to give laws to the spiritual colonies which he profusely scattered along the coast of the Black Sea. In the West, Martin of Tours, a soldier, a hermit, a bishop, and a saint, established the monasteries of Gaul; two thousand of his disciples followed him to the grave; and his eloquent historian challenges the deserts of Thebais to produce, in a more favorable climate, a champion of equal virtue. The progress of the monks was not less rapid, or universal, than that of Christianity itself. Every province, and, at last, every city, of the empire, was filled with their increasing multitudes; and the bleak and barren isles, from Lerins to Lipari, that arose out of the Tuscan Sea, were chosen by the anachorets for the place of their voluntary exile. An easy and perpetual intercourse by sea and land connected the provinces of the Roman world; and the life of Hilarion displays the facility with which an indigent hermit of Palestine might traverse Egypt, embark for Sicily, escape to Epirus, and finally settle in the Island of Cyprus. The Latin Christians embraced the religious institutions of Rome. The pilgrims, who visited Jerusalem, eagerly copied, in the most distant climates of the earth, the faithful model of the monastic life. The disciples of Antony spread themselves beyond the tropic, over the Christian empire of Æthiopia. The monastery of Banchor, in Flintshire, which contained above two thousand brethren, dispersed a numerous colony among the Barbarians of Ireland; and Iona, one of the Hebrides, which was planted by the Irish monks, diffused over the northern regions a doubtful ray of science and superstition.
Athanasius brought the knowledge and practice of monastic life to Rome, and a group of Antony's disciples opened a school of this new philosophy when they accompanied their leader to the holy site of the Vatican. The unusual and wild appearance of these Egyptians initially caused horror and disdain, but eventually led to admiration and enthusiastic imitation. Senators, especially the women, began turning their palaces and villas into religious homes; the once-narrow institution of six Vestals was overshadowed by the many monasteries that arose on the ruins of ancient temples and in the Roman forum. Inspired by Antony's example, a Syrian youth named Hilarion settled in a desolate place on a sandy beach between the sea and marshes, about seven miles from Gaza. His strict penance, which he practiced for forty-eight years, inspired similar enthusiasm, and he was followed by two or three thousand hermits whenever he visited the countless monasteries in Palestine. Basil's reputation is unforgettable in the monastic history of the East. With a mind that had experienced the education and eloquence of Athens, and with ambitions that exceeded even the archbishopric of Cæsarea, Basil withdrew to a harsh solitude in Pontus; for a time, he directed the spiritual communities he widely established along the Black Sea coast. In the West, Martin of Tours—who was a soldier, hermit, bishop, and saint—established the monasteries of Gaul; two thousand of his followers were buried with him, and his eloquent historian challenges the deserts of Thebais to find a champion of equal virtue in a more hospitable climate. The spread of monks was as rapid and widespread as that of Christianity itself. Every province, and eventually every city in the empire, was filled with their growing numbers; and the desolate islands from Lerins to Lipari, rising from the Tuscan Sea, were chosen by hermits for their voluntary exile. A simple and constant connection by sea and land linked the provinces of the Roman world, and Hilarion's life illustrates how easily a poor hermit from Palestine could travel through Egypt, sail to Sicily, escape to Epirus, and finally settle on the Island of Cyprus. The Latin Christians adopted the religious practices of Rome. Pilgrims visiting Jerusalem eagerly copied the faithful model of monastic life in the farthest reaches of the earth. Antony’s disciples spread into the Christian empire of Ethiopia. The monastery of Banchor in Flintshire, which housed over two thousand brothers, sent a large colony to the Barbarians of Ireland; and Iona, one of the Hebrides established by Irish monks, spread a faint light of knowledge and superstition across the northern regions.
These unhappy exiles from social life were impelled by the dark and implacable genius of superstition. Their mutual resolution was supported by the example of millions, of either sex, of every age, and of every rank; and each proselyte who entered the gates of a monastery, was persuaded that he trod the steep and thorny path of eternal happiness. But the operation of these religious motives was variously determined by the temper and situation of mankind. Reason might subdue, or passion might suspend, their influence: but they acted most forcibly on the infirm minds of children and females; they were strengthened by secret remorse, or accidental misfortune; and they might derive some aid from the temporal considerations of vanity or interest. It was naturally supposed, that the pious and humble monks, who had renounced the world to accomplish the work of their salvation, were the best qualified for the spiritual government of the Christians. The reluctant hermit was torn from his cell, and seated, amidst the acclamations of the people, on the episcopal throne: the monasteries of Egypt, of Gaul, and of the East, supplied a regular succession of saints and bishops; and ambition soon discovered the secret road which led to the possession of wealth and honors. The popular monks, whose reputation was connected with the fame and success of the order, assiduously labored to multiply the number of their fellow-captives. They insinuated themselves into noble and opulent families; and the specious arts of flattery and seduction were employed to secure those proselytes who might bestow wealth or dignity on the monastic profession. The indignant father bewailed the loss, perhaps, of an only son; the credulous maid was betrayed by vanity to violate the laws of nature; and the matron aspired to imaginary perfection, by renouncing the virtues of domestic life. Paula yielded to the persuasive eloquence of Jerom; and the profane title of mother-in-law of God tempted that illustrious widow to consecrate the virginity of her daughter Eustochium. By the advice, and in the company, of her spiritual guide, Paula abandoned Rome and her infant son; retired to the holy village of Bethlem; founded a hospital and four monasteries; and acquired, by her alms and penance, an eminent and conspicuous station in the Catholic church. Such rare and illustrious penitents were celebrated as the glory and example of their age; but the monasteries were filled by a crowd of obscure and abject plebeians, who gained in the cloister much more than they had sacrificed in the world. Peasants, slaves, and mechanics, might escape from poverty and contempt to a safe and honorable profession; whose apparent hardships are mitigated by custom, by popular applause, and by the secret relaxation of discipline. The subjects of Rome, whose persons and fortunes were made responsible for unequal and exorbitant tributes, retired from the oppression of the Imperial government; and the pusillanimous youth preferred the penance of a monastic, to the dangers of a military, life. The affrighted provincials of every rank, who fled before the Barbarians, found shelter and subsistence: whole legions were buried in these religious sanctuaries; and the same cause, which relieved the distress of individuals, impaired the strength and fortitude of the empire.
These unhappy exiles from society were driven by the dark and relentless power of superstition. Their shared determination was bolstered by the example of millions, regardless of gender, age, or social status; and each new member entering a monastery believed they were walking the difficult and painful path to eternal happiness. However, the effects of these religious motivations varied depending on people's personalities and circumstances. Reason could calm, or passion could temporarily set aside, their influence, but they had the strongest impact on the fragile minds of children and women. They were reinforced by hidden guilt or unexpected misfortune, and might also gain support from worldly concerns like vanity or self-interest. It was generally assumed that the devout and humble monks, who had forsaken worldly life to pursue their own salvation, were best suited for leading the spiritual lives of Christians. The unwilling hermit was pulled from his cell and placed, to the cheers of the crowd, on the episcopal throne: the monasteries in Egypt, Gaul, and the East continuously produced saints and bishops; and ambition quickly discovered the hidden path to wealth and honor. Popular monks, whose reputations were linked to the fame and success of their order, worked tirelessly to increase the number of their fellow captives. They ingratiated themselves into wealthy and noble families, using flattering and seductive tactics to win over converts who could provide riches or status to the monastic community. The heartbroken father mourned perhaps the loss of his only son; the naive young woman was led astray by vanity to break the laws of nature; and the matron sought an idealized perfection by renouncing the virtues of home life. Paula was swayed by the convincing words of Jerome; and the irreverent title of mother-in-law of God led that distinguished widow to dedicate the virginity of her daughter Eustochium. Following the advice and companionship of her spiritual guide, Paula left Rome and her infant son; retreated to the holy village of Bethlehem; established a hospital and four monasteries; and through her charitable acts and penance, earned a prominent place in the Catholic Church. Such rare and notable penitents were celebrated as the pride and exemplars of their time; but the monasteries were filled with a crowd of obscure and lowly commoners, who gained much more inside the cloister than they had sacrificed in the outside world. Peasants, slaves, and laborers could escape poverty and disgrace to a safe and honorable vocation, whose apparent hardships were softened by tradition, public approval, and occasional relaxations of discipline. The subjects of Rome, whose lives and fortunes were burdened with unfair and excessive taxes, withdrew from the oppression of imperial rule; and the timid youth preferred the challenges of monastic life over the dangers of military service. Terrified people of all ranks, fleeing from the Barbarians, found refuge and support: entire legions were hidden in these religious sanctuaries; and the same circumstances that eased individual hardships weakened the strength and resilience of the empire.
The monastic profession of the ancients was an act of voluntary devotion. The inconstant fanatic was threatened with the eternal vengeance of the God whom he deserted; but the doors of the monastery were still open for repentance. Those monks, whose conscience was fortified by reason or passion, were at liberty to resume the character of men and citizens; and even the spouses of Christ might accept the legal embraces of an earthly lover. The examples of scandal, and the progress of superstition, suggested the propriety of more forcible restraints. After a sufficient trial, the fidelity of the novice was secured by a solemn and perpetual vow; and his irrevocable engagement was ratified by the laws of the church and state. A guilty fugitive was pursued, arrested, and restored to his perpetual prison; and the interposition of the magistrate oppressed the freedom and the merit, which had alleviated, in some degree, the abject slavery of the monastic discipline. The actions of a monk, his words, and even his thoughts, were determined by an inflexible rule, or a capricious superior: the slightest offences were corrected by disgrace or confinement, extraordinary fasts, or bloody flagellation; and disobedience, murmur, or delay, were ranked in the catalogue of the most heinous sins. A blind submission to the commands of the abbot, however absurd, or even criminal, they might seem, was the ruling principle, the first virtue of the Egyptian monks; and their patience was frequently exercised by the most extravagant trials. They were directed to remove an enormous rock; assiduously to water a barren staff, that was planted in the ground, till, at the end of three years, it should vegetate and blossom like a tree; to walk into a fiery furnace; or to cast their infant into a deep pond: and several saints, or madmen, have been immortalized in monastic story, by their thoughtless and fearless obedience. The freedom of the mind, the source of every generous and rational sentiment, was destroyed by the habits of credulity and submission; and the monk, contracting the vices of a slave, devoutly followed the faith and passions of his ecclesiastical tyrant. The peace of the Eastern church was invaded by a swarm of fanatics, incapable of fear, or reason, or humanity; and the Imperial troops acknowledged, without shame, that they were much less apprehensive of an encounter with the fiercest Barbarians.
The monastic life of ancient times was a choice of voluntary devotion. The fickle zealot was warned about the eternal wrath of the God he abandoned; however, the doors of the monastery were still open for those seeking forgiveness. Monks, whose consciences were strengthened by reason or emotion, were allowed to return to being regular men and citizens; even those committed to Christ could take on the legal embrace of a worldly partner. Scandals and the rise of superstition indicated the need for stronger restrictions. After a sufficient period of testing, a novice's loyalty was guaranteed by a solemn and lifelong vow, and this unchangeable commitment was validated by the laws of both the church and the state. A runaway was pursued, caught, and returned to his everlasting confinement; and the involvement of the authorities limited the freedom and worth that had somewhat eased the stringent oppression of monastic life. A monk’s actions, words, and even thoughts were dictated by strict rules or a whim by a superior: minor infractions were punished with disgrace, imprisonment, unusual fasting, or harsh punishment; disobedience, complaints, or delays were considered some of the gravest sins. Blindly obeying the abbot's orders, no matter how absurd or even wrong they might seem, was the core principle, the foremost virtue among the Egyptian monks; their patience was often tested by the most bizarre challenges. They were instructed to move a massive rock, tirelessly water a barren stick planted in the ground until, after three years, it would sprout and bloom like a tree; to walk into a fiery furnace; or to throw their infant into a deep pond. Many saints, or perhaps madmen, have been immortalized in monastic tales for their reckless and fearless obedience. The freedom of thought, the foundation of every noble and rational feeling, was crushed by habits of gullibility and submission; and the monk, adopting the vices of a slave, devotedly followed the beliefs and passions of his ecclesiastical oppressor. The peace of the Eastern church was disrupted by a horde of zealots, incapable of fear, reason, or humanity; and the Imperial troops admitted, without shame, that they were far less afraid of confronting the fiercest Barbarians.
Superstition has often framed and consecrated the fantastic garments of the monks: but their apparent singularity sometimes proceeds from their uniform attachment to a simple and primitive model, which the revolutions of fashion have made ridiculous in the eyes of mankind. The father of the Benedictines expressly disclaims all idea of choice of merit; and soberly exhorts his disciples to adopt the coarse and convenient dress of the countries which they may inhabit. The monastic habits of the ancients varied with the climate, and their mode of life; and they assumed, with the same indifference, the sheep-skin of the Egyptian peasants, or the cloak of the Grecian philosophers. They allowed themselves the use of linen in Egypt, where it was a cheap and domestic manufacture; but in the West they rejected such an expensive article of foreign luxury. It was the practice of the monks either to cut or shave their hair; they wrapped their heads in a cowl to escape the sight of profane objects; their legs and feet were naked, except in the extreme cold of winter; and their slow and feeble steps were supported by a long staff. The aspect of a genuine anachoret was horrid and disgusting: every sensation that is offensive to man was thought acceptable to God; and the angelic rule of Tabenne condemned the salutary custom of bathing the limbs in water, and of anointing them with oil. The austere monks slept on the ground, on a hard mat, or a rough blanket; and the same bundle of palm-leaves served them as a seat in the lay, and a pillow in the night. Their original cells were low, narrow huts, built of the slightest materials; which formed, by the regular distribution of the streets, a large and populous village, enclosing, within the common wall, a church, a hospital, perhaps a library, some necessary offices, a garden, and a fountain or reservoir of fresh water. Thirty or forty brethren composed a family of separate discipline and diet; and the great monasteries of Egypt consisted of thirty or forty families.
Superstition has often shaped and highlighted the unique clothing of monks, but their seeming distinctiveness often comes from their consistent adherence to a simple, traditional style, which the changes in fashion have rendered absurd in the eyes of society. The founder of the Benedictines explicitly rejects any notion of choosing garments based on quality; instead, he wisely urges his followers to wear the rough and practical attire typical of the regions they live in. The monastic clothing in ancient times varied depending on the climate and lifestyle, and they would wear, without reservation, the sheepskin of Egyptian farmers or the cloak of Greek philosophers. In Egypt, they permitted themselves to use linen, since it was affordable and locally available, but in the West, they turned down such an extravagant foreign luxury. Monks typically cut or shaved their hair; they covered their heads with a cowl to avoid seeing secular things; their legs and feet were bare, except during the harsh winter; and they relied on a long staff to support their slow, unsteady movements. The appearance of a true hermit was horrifying and repulsive: everything deemed unpleasant to humans was seen as pleasing to God; and the angelic rule of Tabenne disapproved of the healthy practice of washing their limbs in water and anointing them with oil. The austere monks slept on the ground, on a hard mat, or a rough blanket; and they used the same bundle of palm leaves as both a seat during the day and a pillow at night. Their original cells were small, low huts made from the simplest materials; these formed a well-organized layout that created a large, populous village, containing, within its walls, a church, a hospital, and possibly a library, along with some essential rooms, a garden, and a fountain or reservoir for fresh water. Thirty or forty monks made up a family with distinct rules and diet; and the large monasteries of Egypt consisted of thirty or forty such families.
Chapter XXXVII: Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity.—Part II.
Pleasure and guilt are synonymous terms in the language of the monks, and they discovered, by experience, that rigid fasts, and abstemious diet, are the most effectual preservatives against the impure desires of the flesh. The rules of abstinence which they imposed, or practised, were not uniform or perpetual: the cheerful festival of the Pentecost was balanced by the extraordinary mortification of Lent; the fervor of new monasteries was insensibly relaxed; and the voracious appetite of the Gauls could not imitate the patient and temperate virtue of the Egyptians. The disciples of Antony and Pachomius were satisfied with their daily pittance, of twelve ounces of bread, or rather biscuit, which they divided into two frugal repasts, of the afternoon and of the evening. It was esteemed a merit, and almost a duty, to abstain from the boiled vegetables which were provided for the refectory; but the extraordinary bounty of the abbot sometimes indulged them with the luxury of cheese, fruit, salad, and the small dried fish of the Nile. A more ample latitude of sea and river fish was gradually allowed or assumed; but the use of flesh was long confined to the sick or travellers; and when it gradually prevailed in the less rigid monasteries of Europe, a singular distinction was introduced; as if birds, whether wild or domestic, had been less profane than the grosser animals of the field. Water was the pure and innocent beverage of the primitive monks; and the founder of the Benedictines regrets the daily portion of half a pint of wine, which had been extorted from him by the intemperance of the age. Such an allowance might be easily supplied by the vineyards of Italy; and his victorious disciples, who passed the Alps, the Rhine, and the Baltic, required, in the place of wine, an adequate compensation of strong beer or cider.
Pleasure and guilt are seen as the same thing in the monks' world, and they learned from experience that strict fasting and a simple diet are the best ways to guard against the sinful desires of the body. The rules of abstinence they followed weren't consistent or permanent: the joyful celebration of Pentecost was matched by the intense self-denial of Lent; the enthusiasm of new monasteries gradually faded; and the hungry appetites of the Gauls couldn't replicate the patient and modest self-control of the Egyptians. The followers of Antony and Pachomius were content with their daily ration of twelve ounces of bread, or more like biscuits, which they split into two simple meals, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. It was considered a virtue, almost a duty, to avoid the boiled vegetables provided in the dining hall; but sometimes the generosity of the abbot allowed them the indulgence of cheese, fruit, salad, and small dried fish from the Nile. Over time, they were gradually allowed to eat more sea and river fish, but meat was long reserved for the sick or travelers; and as it slowly became more common in the less strict monasteries of Europe, a unique distinction was made, as if birds, whether wild or domesticated, were somehow less sinful than the larger farm animals. Water was the pure and innocent drink of the early monks; and the founder of the Benedictines lamented the daily allowance of half a pint of wine, which he was forced to accept due to the excessive drinking of the times. This much wine could easily be sourced from Italy's vineyards; and his successful followers, who crossed the Alps, the Rhine, and the Baltic, needed, instead of wine, a suitable amount of strong beer or cider.
The candidate who aspired to the virtue of evangelical poverty, abjured, at his first entrance into a regular community, the idea, and even the name, of all separate or exclusive possessions. The brethren were supported by their manual labor; and the duty of labor was strenuously recommended as a penance, as an exercise, and as the most laudable means of securing their daily subsistence. The garden and fields, which the industry of the monks had often rescued from the forest or the morass, were diligently cultivated by their hands. They performed, without reluctance, the menial offices of slaves and domestics; and the several trades that were necessary to provide their habits, their utensils, and their lodging, were exercised within the precincts of the great monasteries. The monastic studies have tended, for the most part, to darken, rather than to dispel, the cloud of superstition. Yet the curiosity or zeal of some learned solitaries has cultivated the ecclesiastical, and even the profane, sciences; and posterity must gratefully acknowledge, that the monuments of Greek and Roman literature have been preserved and multiplied by their indefatigable pens. But the more humble industry of the monks, especially in Egypt, was contented with the silent, sedentary occupation of making wooden sandals, or of twisting the leaves of the palm-tree into mats and baskets. The superfluous stock, which was not consumed in domestic use, supplied, by trade, the wants of the community: the boats of Tabenne, and the other monasteries of Thebais, descended the Nile as far as Alexandria; and, in a Christian market, the sanctity of the workmen might enhance the intrinsic value of the work.
The candidate who sought the virtue of evangelical poverty gave up, upon joining a regular community, the concept and even the name of all separate or exclusive possessions. The brothers were supported by their manual labor, and they emphasized labor as a form of penance, a practice, and the most commendable way to secure their daily food. The gardens and fields, which the monks had often reclaimed from the wilderness or swamp, were carefully tended by them. They willingly took on the menial tasks of servants and laborers, and various trades necessary for providing their clothing, tools, and shelter were practiced within the grounds of the large monasteries. While monastic studies mostly contributed to obscuring rather than clearing up the fog of superstition, the curiosity or enthusiasm of some learned individuals cultivated both ecclesiastical and secular sciences. Future generations will rightly acknowledge that the works of Greek and Roman literature were preserved and multiplied by their tireless efforts. However, the more modest work of the monks, especially in Egypt, was satisfied with the quiet, sedentary tasks of making wooden sandals or weaving palm leaves into mats and baskets. The surplus stock, which wasn't used at home, was traded to meet the needs of the community: the boats from Tabenne and other monasteries in Thebais sailed down the Nile as far as Alexandria, and in a Christian market, the sanctity of the workers could increase the inherent value of their products.
But the necessity of manual labor was insensibly superseded. The novice was tempted to bestow his fortune on the saints, in whose society he was resolved to spend the remainder of his life; and the pernicious indulgence of the laws permitted him to receive, for their use, any future accessions of legacy or inheritance. Melania contributed her plate, three hundred pounds weight of silver; and Paula contracted an immense debt, for the relief of their favorite monks; who kindly imparted the merits of their prayers and penance to a rich and liberal sinner. Time continually increased, and accidents could seldom diminish, the estates of the popular monasteries, which spread over the adjacent country and cities: and, in the first century of their institution, the infidel Zosimus has maliciously observed, that, for the benefit of the poor, the Christian monks had reduced a great part of mankind to a state of beggary. As long as they maintained their original fervor, they approved themselves, however, the faithful and benevolent stewards of the charity, which was entrusted to their care. But their discipline was corrupted by prosperity: they gradually assumed the pride of wealth, and at last indulged the luxury of expense. Their public luxury might be excused by the magnificence of religious worship, and the decent motive of erecting durable habitations for an immortal society. But every age of the church has accused the licentiousness of the degenerate monks; who no longer remembered the object of their institution, embraced the vain and sensual pleasures of the world, which they had renounced, and scandalously abused the riches which had been acquired by the austere virtues of their founders. Their natural descent, from such painful and dangerous virtue, to the common vices of humanity, will not, perhaps, excite much grief or indignation in the mind of a philosopher.
But the need for manual labor gradually faded away. The beginner was tempted to give his wealth to the saints, with whom he planned to spend the rest of his life; and the harmful leniency of the laws allowed him to receive any future legacies or inheritances for their benefit. Melania donated her silver, totaling three hundred pounds; and Paula took on huge debts to support their favorite monks, who generously shared the rewards of their prayers and penance with a wealthy and generous sinner. Over time, the wealth of the popular monasteries, which expanded into the nearby countryside and cities, continued to grow, while incidents rarely diminished it. In the first century of their establishment, the nonbeliever Zosimus spitefully noted that, in the name of helping the poor, the Christian monks had left a large part of humanity in a state of begging. As long as they preserved their original enthusiasm, they proved to be faithful and charitable stewards of the compassion entrusted to them. However, their discipline was weakened by success: they gradually developed a sense of pride in their riches and eventually indulged in luxurious living. Their public extravagance could be justified by the grandeur of religious worship and the honorable goal of building lasting homes for an eternal community. Yet every era of the church has criticized the excesses of the corrupt monks, who no longer remembered the purpose of their establishment, embraced the empty and sensual pleasures of the world they had once rejected, and scandalously misused the wealth obtained through the strict virtues of their founders. Their natural decline from such rigorous and risky virtue to the common vices of humanity may not evoke much sorrow or anger in the mind of a philosopher.
The lives of the primitive monks were consumed in penance and solitude; undisturbed by the various occupations which fill the time, and exercise the faculties, of reasonable, active, and social beings. Whenever they were permitted to step beyond the precincts of the monastery, two jealous companions were the mutual guards and spies of each other's actions; and, after their return, they were condemned to forget, or, at least, to suppress, whatever they had seen or heard in the world. Strangers, who professed the orthodox faith, were hospitably entertained in a separate apartment; but their dangerous conversation was restricted to some chosen elders of approved discretion and fidelity. Except in their presence, the monastic slave might not receive the visits of his friends or kindred; and it was deemed highly meritorious, if he afflicted a tender sister, or an aged parent, by the obstinate refusal of a word or look. The monks themselves passed their lives, without personal attachments, among a crowd which had been formed by accident, and was detained, in the same prison, by force or prejudice. Recluse fanatics have few ideas or sentiments to communicate: a special license of the abbot regulated the time and duration of their familiar visits; and, at their silent meals, they were enveloped in their cowls, inaccessible, and almost invisible, to each other. Study is the resource of solitude: but education had not prepared and qualified for any liberal studies the mechanics and peasants who filled the monastic communities. They might work: but the vanity of spiritual perfection was tempted to disdain the exercise of manual labor; and the industry must be faint and languid, which is not excited by the sense of personal interest.
The lives of the early monks were dedicated to penance and solitude, free from the various activities that occupy and engage the minds of active and social beings. Whenever they were allowed to leave the monastery, two jealous companions kept a close watch on each other's actions. After returning, they had to forget—or at least suppress—everything they had seen or heard in the outside world. Strangers who followed the orthodox faith were welcomed in a separate room, but their potentially dangerous conversations were limited to a select few trustworthy elders. Outside of their presence, the monastic servant could not receive visits from friends or family, and it was considered a great virtue if he refused to speak or even look at a beloved sister or aging parent. The monks lived their lives without personal connections, surrounded by a group that came together by chance and was kept in the same place by force or tradition. Isolated fanatics rarely had many ideas or feelings to share: the abbot set specific rules regarding the timing and length of their friendly visits, and during their silent meals, they were cloaked in their cowls, making them nearly invisible and inaccessible to one another. Study was a way to escape loneliness, but education hadn’t prepared the workers and peasants in the monastic communities for any serious academic pursuits. They could work, but the desire for spiritual perfection often led them to look down on manual labor, and their efforts could be weak and half-hearted without a sense of personal investment.
According to their faith and zeal, they might employ the day, which they passed in their cells, either in vocal or mental prayer: they assembled in the evening, and they were awakened in the night, for the public worship of the monastery. The precise moment was determined by the stars, which are seldom clouded in the serene sky of Egypt; and a rustic horn, or trumpet, the signal of devotion, twice interrupted the vast silence of the desert. Even sleep, the last refuge of the unhappy, was rigorously measured: the vacant hours of the monk heavily rolled along, without business or pleasure; and, before the close of each day, he had repeatedly accused the tedious progress of the sun. In this comfortless state, superstition still pursued and tormented her wretched votaries. The repose which they had sought in the cloister was disturbed by a tardy repentance, profane doubts, and guilty desires; and, while they considered each natural impulse as an unpardonable sin, they perpetually trembled on the edge of a flaming and bottomless abyss. From the painful struggles of disease and despair, these unhappy victims were sometimes relieved by madness or death; and, in the sixth century, a hospital was founded at Jerusalem for a small portion of the austere penitents, who were deprived of their senses. Their visions, before they attained this extreme and acknowledged term of frenzy, have afforded ample materials of supernatural history. It was their firm persuasion, that the air, which they breathed, was peopled with invisible enemies; with innumerable demons, who watched every occasion, and assumed every form, to terrify, and above all to tempt, their unguarded virtue. The imagination, and even the senses, were deceived by the illusions of distempered fanaticism; and the hermit, whose midnight prayer was oppressed by involuntary slumber, might easily confound the phantoms of horror or delight, which had occupied his sleeping and his waking dreams.
According to their faith and enthusiasm, they spent the day in their cells either in spoken or silent prayer. They gathered in the evening and were roused at night for communal worship at the monastery. The exact timing was determined by the stars, which are rarely hidden in Egypt's clear skies. A rustic horn or trumpet sounded twice, breaking the profound silence of the desert as a call to devotion. Even sleep, the last refuge for the unfortunate, was strictly regulated: the idle hours for the monk dragged on, devoid of work or pleasure, and by the end of each day, he often complained about the slow passage of the sun. In this bleak condition, superstition continued to haunt and torment its miserable followers. The peace they sought in the cloister was disrupted by late repentance, troubling doubts, and guilty desires. While they viewed every natural impulse as an unforgivable sin, they constantly lived in fear of falling into a fiery and endless abyss. From painful struggles with illness and hopelessness, these unfortunate souls were sometimes relieved by madness or death; in the sixth century, a hospital was established in Jerusalem for a few of the austere penitents who had lost their sanity. Their visions, before reaching this extreme state of insanity, provided a wealth of material for supernatural tales. They firmly believed that the air they breathed was filled with unseen foes—countless demons who waited for opportunities and took on various forms to frighten and, above all, tempt their vulnerable virtue. Their imaginations, and even their senses, were tricked by the illusions of misguided fanaticism. The hermit, whose midnight prayers were interrupted by involuntary sleep, could easily confuse the horrifying or delightful phantoms that occupied both his dreams and waking thoughts.
The monks were divided into two classes: the Cnobites, who lived under a common and regular discipline; and the Anachorets, who indulged their unsocial, independent fanaticism. The most devout, or the most ambitious, of the spiritual brethren, renounced the convent, as they had renounced the world. The fervent monasteries of Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, were surrounded by a Laura, a distant circle of solitary cells; and the extravagant penance of Hermits was stimulated by applause and emulation. They sunk under the painful weight of crosses and chains; and their emaciated limbs were confined by collars, bracelets, gauntlets, and greaves of massy and rigid iron. All superfluous encumbrance of dress they contemptuously cast away; and some savage saints of both sexes have been admired, whose naked bodies were only covered by their long hair. They aspired to reduce themselves to the rude and miserable state in which the human brute is scarcely distinguishable above his kindred animals; and the numerous sect of Anachorets derived their name from their humble practice of grazing in the fields of Mesopotamia with the common herd. They often usurped the den of some wild beast whom they affected to resemble; they buried themselves in some gloomy cavern, which art or nature had scooped out of the rock; and the marble quarries of Thebais are still inscribed with the monuments of their penance. The most perfect Hermits are supposed to have passed many days without food, many nights without sleep, and many years without speaking; and glorious was the man ( I abuse that name) who contrived any cell, or seat, of a peculiar construction, which might expose him, in the most inconvenient posture, to the inclemency of the seasons.
The monks were split into two groups: the Cenobites, who lived under a shared and strict discipline, and the Anchorites, who indulged their unsocial, independent fanaticism. The most devoted or ambitious of the spiritual brothers renounced the convent, just as they had renounced the world. The fervent monasteries of Egypt, Palestine, and Syria were surrounded by a Laura, a distant circle of solitary cells; and the extreme penance of Hermits was fueled by applause and competition. They collapsed under the painful burden of crosses and chains, and their emaciated limbs were bound by collars, bracelets, gauntlets, and greaves made of heavy and rigid iron. They scornfully discarded any extra clothing; some extreme saints of both genders were admired for having their naked bodies covered only by their long hair. They aimed to reduce themselves to such a rough and miserable state that they were barely distinguishable from their animal relatives; and the numerous sect of Anchorites got their name from their humble practice of grazing in the fields of Mesopotamia with the common herd. They often took over the den of some wild animal to whom they aimed to resemble; they buried themselves in some dark cave, which art or nature had carved out of the rock; and the marble quarries of Thebais still bear the marks of their penance. The most perfect Hermits are believed to have spent many days without food, many nights without sleep, and many years without speaking; and glorious was the man (I misuse that term) who managed to create any cell or seat of unique design, which would leave him in the most uncomfortable position against the harshness of the seasons.
Among these heroes of the monastic life, the name and genius of Simeon Stylites have been immortalized by the singular invention of an aërial penance. At the age of thirteen, the young Syrian deserted the profession of a shepherd, and threw himself into an austere monastery. After a long and painful novitiate, in which Simeon was repeatedly saved from pious suicide, he established his residence on a mountain, about thirty or forty miles to the east of Antioch. Within the space of a mandra, or circle of stones, to which he had attached himself by a ponderous chain, he ascended a column, which was successively raised from the height of nine, to that of sixty, feet from the ground. In this last and lofty station, the Syrian Anachoret resisted the heat of thirty summers, and the cold of as many winters. Habit and exercise instructed him to maintain his dangerous situation without fear or giddiness, and successively to assume the different postures of devotion. He sometimes prayed in an erect attitude, with his outstretched arms in the figure of a cross, but his most familiar practice was that of bending his meagre skeleton from the forehead to the feet; and a curious spectator, after numbering twelve hundred and forty-four repetitions, at length desisted from the endless account. The progress of an ulcer in his thigh might shorten, but it could not disturb, this celestial life; and the patient Hermit expired, without descending from his column. A prince, who should capriciously inflict such tortures, would be deemed a tyrant; but it would surpass the power of a tyrant to impose a long and miserable existence on the reluctant victims of his cruelty. This voluntary martyrdom must have gradually destroyed the sensibility both of the mind and body; nor can it be presumed that the fanatics, who torment themselves, are susceptible of any lively affection for the rest of mankind. A cruel, unfeeling temper has distinguished the monks of every age and country: their stern indifference, which is seldom mollified by personal friendship, is inflamed by religious hatred; and their merciless zeal has strenuously administered the holy office of the Inquisition.
Among these heroes of monastic life, the name and brilliance of Simeon Stylites have been immortalized by his unique approach to penance. At just thirteen, the young Syrian left his job as a shepherd and joined a strict monastery. After a long and painful period of training, during which he was repeatedly saved from a religiously motivated suicide, he chose to live on a mountain about thirty or forty miles east of Antioch. Within a stone circle, to which he was secured by a heavy chain, he climbed a column, which he progressively raised from nine to sixty feet high. In this last and lofty position, the Syrian hermit endured the heat of thirty summers and the cold of as many winters. Over time, he learned to maintain his perilous stance without fear or dizziness and to adopt various postures of devotion. He sometimes prayed standing with his arms stretched out in the shape of a cross, but his most common practice was to bend his thin body from head to toe; one curious observer, after counting twelve hundred and forty-four repetitions, finally gave up on the endless tally. The worsening ulcer in his thigh might have limited him, but it couldn't disrupt his heavenly life; the patient hermit died without ever coming down from his column. A ruler who would inflict such tortures would be seen as a tyrant; yet it would be beyond a tyrant's power to impose a lengthy and miserable existence on unwilling victims of his cruelty. This voluntary martyrdom must have gradually dulled the sensitivity of both mind and body; and it's hard to believe that those who inflict pain on themselves could feel much affection for others. A cruel, unfeeling nature has characterized monks throughout history and around the world: their strict indifference, which is rarely softened by personal friendship, is intensified by religious hatred; and their relentless zeal has fervently supported the holy office of the Inquisition.
The monastic saints, who excite only the contempt and pity of a philosopher, were respected, and almost adored, by the prince and people. Successive crowds of pilgrims from Gaul and India saluted the divine pillar of Simeon: the tribes of Saracens disputed in arms the honor of his benediction; the queens of Arabia and Persia gratefully confessed his supernatural virtue; and the angelic Hermit was consulted by the younger Theodosius, in the most important concerns of the church and state. His remains were transported from the mountain of Telenissa, by a solemn procession of the patriarch, the master-general of the East, six bishops, twenty-one counts or tribunes, and six thousand soldiers; and Antioch revered his bones, as her glorious ornament and impregnable defence. The fame of the apostles and martyrs was gradually eclipsed by these recent and popular Anachorets; the Christian world fell prostrate before their shrines; and the miracles ascribed to their relics exceeded, at least in number and duration, the spiritual exploits of their lives. But the golden legend of their lives was embellished by the artful credulity of their interested brethren; and a believing age was easily persuaded, that the slightest caprice of an Egyptian or a Syrian monk had been sufficient to interrupt the eternal laws of the universe. The favorites of Heaven were accustomed to cure inveterate diseases with a touch, a word, or a distant message; and to expel the most obstinate demons from the souls or bodies which they possessed. They familiarly accosted, or imperiously commanded, the lions and serpents of the desert; infused vegetation into a sapless trunk; suspended iron on the surface of the water; passed the Nile on the back of a crocodile, and refreshed themselves in a fiery furnace. These extravagant tales, which display the fiction without the genius, of poetry, have seriously affected the reason, the faith, and the morals, of the Christians. Their credulity debased and vitiated the faculties of the mind: they corrupted the evidence of history; and superstition gradually extinguished the hostile light of philosophy and science. Every mode of religious worship which had been practised by the saints, every mysterious doctrine which they believed, was fortified by the sanction of divine revelation, and all the manly virtues were oppressed by the servile and pusillanimous reign of the monks. If it be possible to measure the interval between the philosophic writings of Cicero and the sacred legend of Theodoret, between the character of Cato and that of Simeon, we may appreciate the memorable revolution which was accomplished in the Roman empire within a period of five hundred years.
The monastic saints, who provoke only disdain and pity from philosophers, were respected and almost worshipped by both the prince and the common people. Waves of pilgrims from Gaul and India honored the divine pillar of Simeon: the Saracen tribes fought for the privilege of receiving his blessing; the queens of Arabia and Persia gratefully acknowledged his miraculous powers; and the angelic hermit was consulted by the young Theodosius on crucial matters concerning the church and state. His remains were brought down from the mountain of Telenissa in a grand procession led by the patriarch, the master-general of the East, six bishops, twenty-one counts or tribunes, and six thousand soldiers; Antioch regarded his bones as her glorious treasure and her strong defense. The fame of the apostles and martyrs slowly faded in comparison to these recent and popular hermits; the Christian world bowed down before their shrines, and the miracles attributed to their relics outnumbered, at least in quantity and duration, the spiritual achievements of their lives. Yet the golden tales of their lives were enhanced by the crafty gullibility of their self-interested followers; and a believing society was easily convinced that the smallest whim of an Egyptian or Syrian monk could disrupt the eternal laws of the universe. The favorites of Heaven were known to heal chronic illnesses with a touch, a word, or a message from afar; to drive out the most stubborn demons from the souls or bodies they possessed. They casually interacted with, or commanded, the lions and snakes of the desert; brought life to a lifeless tree; floated iron on water; crossed the Nile on the back of a crocodile, and stayed safe in a fiery furnace. These outrageous stories, which showcase the imagination without the artistry, have seriously impacted the reason, faith, and morals of Christians. Their gullibility weakened and warped their mental faculties: they distorted historical evidence; and superstition gradually extinguished the opposing light of philosophy and science. Every form of religious practice established by the saints and every mysterious belief they held was backed by claims of divine revelation, while all noble virtues were crushed under the oppressive and cowardly rule of the monks. If it's possible to measure the gap between Cicero's philosophical writings and the sacred legends of Theodoret, between the character of Cato and that of Simeon, we can appreciate the significant change that occurred in the Roman Empire over the course of five hundred years.
II. The progress of Christianity has been marked by two glorious and decisive victories: over the learned and luxurious citizens of the Roman empire; and over the warlike Barbarians of Scythia and Germany, who subverted the empire, and embraced the religion, of the Romans. The Goths were the foremost of these savage proselytes; and the nation was indebted for its conversion to a countryman, or, at least, to a subject, worthy to be ranked among the inventors of useful arts, who have deserved the remembrance and gratitude of posterity. A great number of Roman provincials had been led away into captivity by the Gothic bands, who ravaged Asia in the time of Gallienus; and of these captives, many were Christians, and several belonged to the ecclesiastical order. Those involuntary missionaries, dispersed as slaves in the villages of Dacia, successively labored for the salvation of their masters. The seeds which they planted, of the evangelic doctrine, were gradually propagated; and before the end of a century, the pious work was achieved by the labors of Ulphilas, whose ancestors had been transported beyond the Danube from a small town of Cappadocia.
II. The growth of Christianity has been marked by two significant victories: over the educated and wealthy citizens of the Roman Empire; and over the warlike Barbarians of Scythia and Germany, who toppled the empire and adopted the religion of the Romans. The Goths were the first among these fierce converts, and the nation owes its conversion to a local hero, or at least to a subject, deserving to be remembered among those who invented useful arts and deserve the gratitude of future generations. A large number of Roman provincials had been taken captive by the Gothic groups that raided Asia during the time of Gallienus; among these captives, many were Christians, and several were part of the clergy. Those unwilling missionaries, scattered as slaves in the villages of Dacia, worked tirelessly for the salvation of their masters. The seeds they planted of the gospel message were gradually spread, and by the end of a century, their devoted efforts culminated in the work of Ulphilas, whose family had been brought across the Danube from a small town in Cappadocia.
Ulphilas, the bishop and apostle of the Goths, acquired their love and reverence by his blameless life and indefatigable zeal; and they received, with implicit confidence, the doctrines of truth and virtue which he preached and practised. He executed the arduous task of translating the Scriptures into their native tongue, a dialect of the German or Teutonic language; but he prudently suppressed the four books of Kings, as they might tend to irritate the fierce and sanguinary spirit of the Barbarians. The rude, imperfect idiom of soldiers and shepherds, so ill qualified to communicate any spiritual ideas, was improved and modulated by his genius: and Ulphilas, before he could frame his version, was obliged to compose a new alphabet of twenty-four letters; four of which he invented, to express the peculiar sounds that were unknown to the Greek and Latin pronunciation. But the prosperous state of the Gothic church was soon afflicted by war and intestine discord, and the chieftains were divided by religion as well as by interest. Fritigern, the friend of the Romans, became the proselyte of Ulphilas; while the haughty soul of Athanaric disdained the yoke of the empire and of the gospel The faith of the new converts was tried by the persecution which he excited. A wagon, bearing aloft the shapeless image of Thor, perhaps, or of Woden, was conducted in solemn procession through the streets of the camp; and the rebels, who refused to worship the god of their fathers, were immediately burnt, with their tents and families. The character of Ulphilas recommended him to the esteem of the Eastern court, where he twice appeared as the minister of peace; he pleaded the cause of the distressed Goths, who implored the protection of Valens; and the name of Moses was applied to this spiritual guide, who conducted his people through the deep waters of the Danube to the Land of Promise. The devout shepherds, who were attached to his person, and tractable to his voice, acquiesced in their settlement, at the foot of the Mæsian mountains, in a country of woodlands and pastures, which supported their flocks and herds, and enabled them to purchase the corn and wine of the more plentiful provinces. These harmless Barbarians multiplied in obscure peace and the profession of Christianity.
Ulphilas, the bishop and apostle of the Goths, earned their love and respect through his righteous life and tireless passion; they wholeheartedly embraced the teachings of truth and virtue that he preached and lived by. He took on the challenging task of translating the Scriptures into their native language, a dialect of the German or Teutonic language; however, he wisely omitted the four books of Kings, as they could provoke the fierce and bloodthirsty nature of the Barbarians. The rough and limited language of soldiers and shepherds, poorly suited for expressing spiritual concepts, was refined and shaped by his intellect: and before he could create his translation, Ulphilas had to devise a new alphabet of twenty-four letters, four of which he invented to represent sounds that were not found in Greek or Latin. However, the flourishing Gothic church soon faced adversity from war and internal conflict, with leaders divided by both religion and personal interests. Fritigern, a friend of the Romans, became a follower of Ulphilas, while the proud Athanaric rejected the rule of the empire and the gospel. The faith of the new converts was tested by the persecution he instigated. A wagon, proudly displaying the formless image of Thor or perhaps Woden, was paraded through the camp's streets; and those who refused to worship the god of their ancestors were swiftly burned, along with their tents and families. Ulphilas' character earned him respect at the Eastern court, where he appeared twice as a peace ambassador; he advocated for the suffering Goths, who sought the protection of Valens, and the name Moses was given to this spiritual leader, who guided his people through the treacherous waters of the Danube to the Promised Land. The devoted shepherds who followed him and listened to his guidance agreed to settle at the base of the Mæsian mountains, in a region rich in woodlands and pastures that supported their flocks and herds, allowing them to acquire grain and wine from the more abundant provinces. These peaceful Barbarians thrived in obscurity while embracing Christianity.
Their fiercer brethren, the formidable Visigoths, universally adopted the religion of the Romans, with whom they maintained a perpetual intercourse, of war, of friendship, or of conquest. In their long and victorious march from the Danube to the Atlantic Ocean, they converted their allies; they educated the rising generation; and the devotion which reigned in the camp of Alaric, or the court of Thoulouse, might edify or disgrace the palaces of Rome and Constantinople. During the same period, Christianity was embraced by almost all the Barbarians, who established their kingdoms on the ruins of the Western empire; the Burgundians in Gaul, the Suevi in Spain, the Vandals in Africa, the Ostrogoths in Pannonia, and the various bands of mercenaries, that raised Odoacer to the throne of Italy. The Franks and the Saxons still persevered in the errors of Paganism; but the Franks obtained the monarchy of Gaul by their submission to the example of Clovis; and the Saxon conquerors of Britain were reclaimed from their savage superstition by the missionaries of Rome. These Barbarian proselytes displayed an ardent and successful zeal in the propagation of the faith. The Merovingian kings, and their successors, Charlemagne and the Othos, extended, by their laws and victories, the dominion of the cross. England produced the apostle of Germany; and the evangelic light was gradually diffused from the neighborhood of the Rhine, to the nations of the Elbe, the Vistula, and the Baltic.
Their fiercer relatives, the powerful Visigoths, fully embraced the religion of the Romans, with whom they constantly interacted—whether through war, friendship, or conquest. During their long and victorious journey from the Danube to the Atlantic Ocean, they converted their allies; they educated the younger generation; and the devotion found in the camp of Alaric or the court of Toulouse could either uplift or shame the palaces of Rome and Constantinople. Around the same time, almost all the Barbarians who set up their kingdoms on the ruins of the Western Empire adopted Christianity—the Burgundians in Gaul, the Suevi in Spain, the Vandals in Africa, the Ostrogoths in Pannonia, and the various groups of mercenaries that raised Odoacer to the throne of Italy. The Franks and the Saxons continued to cling to their Pagan beliefs, but the Franks gained control of Gaul by following the example of Clovis; and the Saxons who conquered Britain were turned away from their savage superstitions by the missionaries from Rome. These Barbarian converts showed a passionate and effective dedication to spreading the faith. The Merovingian kings, along with their successors, Charlemagne and the Othos, expanded the reach of the cross through their laws and victories. England produced the evangelist of Germany, and the message of faith gradually spread from the region around the Rhine to the nations along the Elbe, the Vistula, and the Baltic.
Chapter XXXVII: Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity.—Part III.
The different motives which influenced the reason, or the passions, of the Barbarian converts, cannot easily be ascertained. They were often capricious and accidental; a dream, an omen, the report of a miracle, the example of some priest, or hero, the charms of a believing wife, and, above all, the fortunate event of a prayer, or vow, which, in a moment of danger, they had addressed to the God of the Christians. The early prejudices of education were insensibly erased by the habits of frequent and familiar society, the moral precepts of the gospel were protected by the extravagant virtues of the monks; and a spiritual theology was supported by the visible power of relics, and the pomp of religious worship. But the rational and ingenious mode of persuasion, which a Saxon bishop suggested to a popular saint, might sometimes be employed by the missionaries, who labored for the conversion of infidels. "Admit," says the sagacious disputant, "whatever they are pleased to assert of the fabulous, and carnal, genealogy of their gods and goddesses, who are propagated from each other. From this principle deduce their imperfect nature, and human infirmities, the assurance they were born, and the probability that they will die. At what time, by what means, from what cause, were the eldest of the gods or goddesses produced? Do they still continue, or have they ceased, to propagate? If they have ceased, summon your antagonists to declare the reason of this strange alteration. If they still continue, the number of the gods must become infinite; and shall we not risk, by the indiscreet worship of some impotent deity, to excite the resentment of his jealous superior? The visible heavens and earth, the whole system of the universe, which may be conceived by the mind, is it created or eternal? If created, how, or where, could the gods themselves exist before creation? If eternal, how could they assume the empire of an independent and preexisting world? Urge these arguments with temper and moderation; insinuate, at seasonable intervals, the truth and beauty of the Christian revelation; and endeavor to make the unbelievers ashamed, without making them angry." This metaphysical reasoning, too refined, perhaps, for the Barbarians of Germany, was fortified by the grosser weight of authority and popular consent. The advantage of temporal prosperity had deserted the Pagan cause, and passed over to the service of Christianity. The Romans themselves, the most powerful and enlightened nation of the globe, had renounced their ancient superstition; and, if the ruin of their empire seemed to accuse the efficacy of the new faith, the disgrace was already retrieved by the conversion of the victorious Goths. The valiant and fortunate Barbarians, who subdued the provinces of the West, successively received, and reflected, the same edifying example. Before the age of Charlemagne, the Christian nations of Europe might exult in the exclusive possession of the temperate climates, of the fertile lands, which produced corn, wine, and oil; while the savage idolaters, and their helpless idols, were confined to the extremities of the earth, the dark and frozen regions of the North.
The various reasons that influenced the thoughts and feelings of the Barbarian converts are hard to pin down. They were often random and unpredictable; a dream, a sign, a report of a miracle, the example of a priest or hero, the allure of a believing wife, and, most importantly, the successful outcome of a prayer or vow made to the God of the Christians during a moment of danger. The early biases formed by their upbringing were gradually erased by frequent and close interactions, the moral teachings of the gospel were upheld by the remarkable virtues of the monks, and a spiritual theology was reinforced by the visible power of relics and the grandeur of religious ceremonies. However, the logical and clever arguments suggested by a Saxon bishop to a popular saint were sometimes used by missionaries working to convert non-believers. "Accept," the wise debater said, "whatever they claim about the mythical and physical lineage of their gods and goddesses, who are descended from one another. From this, you can derive their flawed nature and human weaknesses, the fact that they were born, and the likelihood that they will die. When, how, and for what reason were the earliest gods or goddesses created? Do they still exist, or have they stopped reproducing? If they have stopped, challenge your opponents to explain this strange change. If they still create, the number of gods must become endless; and aren't we at risk of angering a jealous higher power by unwisely honoring a powerless deity? The visible heavens and earth, the entire universe that can be imagined, was it created or is it eternal? If it was created, how or where could the gods themselves exist before that creation? If it's eternal, how could they take control of a world that existed independently beforehand? Present these arguments calmly and reasonably; subtly introduce the truth and beauty of the Christian revelation at appropriate moments; and try to make non-believers feel ashamed without provoking their anger." This philosophical reasoning might have been a bit too sophisticated for the German Barbarians, but it was backed up by the heavier support of authority and popular agreement. The benefits of worldly success had left the Pagan side and shifted to the cause of Christianity. The Romans, the most powerful and enlightened nation in the world, had abandoned their old superstitions; and if the fall of their empire seemed to undermine the validity of the new faith, the shame was already offset by the conversion of the victorious Goths. The brave and fortunate Barbarians, who conquered the provinces of the West, gradually adopted and mirrored this uplifting example. Before the time of Charlemagne, the Christian nations of Europe could take pride in their exclusive ownership of the temperate climates and fertile lands that produced grain, wine, and oil, while the savage idolaters and their powerless idols were relegated to the farthest reaches of the earth, the dark and frozen areas of the North.
Christianity, which opened the gates of Heaven to the Barbarians, introduced an important change in their moral and political condition. They received, at the same time, the use of letters, so essential to a religion whose doctrines are contained in a sacred book; and while they studied the divine truth, their minds were insensibly enlarged by the distant view of history, of nature, of the arts, and of society. The version of the Scriptures into their native tongue, which had facilitated their conversion, must excite among their clergy some curiosity to read the original text, to understand the sacred liturgy of the church, and to examine, in the writings of the fathers, the chain of ecclesiastical tradition. These spiritual gifts were preserved in the Greek and Latin languages, which concealed the inestimable monuments of ancient learning. The immortal productions of Virgil, Cicero, and Livy, which were accessible to the Christian Barbarians, maintained a silent intercourse between the reign of Augustus and the times of Clovis and Charlemagne. The emulation of mankind was encouraged by the remembrance of a more perfect state; and the flame of science was secretly kept alive, to warm and enlighten the mature age of the Western world. In the most corrupt state of Christianity, the Barbarians might learn justice from the law, and mercy from the gospel; and if the knowledge of their duty was insufficient to guide their actions, or to regulate their passions, they were sometimes restrained by conscience, and frequently punished by remorse. But the direct authority of religion was less effectual than the holy communion, which united them with their Christian brethren in spiritual friendship. The influence of these sentiments contributed to secure their fidelity in the service, or the alliance, of the Romans, to alleviate the horrors of war, to moderate the insolence of conquest, and to preserve, in the downfall of the empire, a permanent respect for the name and institutions of Rome. In the days of Paganism, the priests of Gaul and Germany reigned over the people, and controlled the jurisdiction of the magistrates; and the zealous proselytes transferred an equal, or more ample, measure of devout obedience, to the pontiffs of the Christian faith. The sacred character of the bishops was supported by their temporal possessions; they obtained an honorable seat in the legislative assemblies of soldiers and freemen; and it was their interest, as well as their duty, to mollify, by peaceful counsels, the fierce spirit of the Barbarians. The perpetual correspondence of the Latin clergy, the frequent pilgrimages to Rome and Jerusalem, and the growing authority of the popes, cemented the union of the Christian republic, and gradually produced the similar manners, and common jurisprudence, which have distinguished, from the rest of mankind, the independent, and even hostile, nations of modern Europe.
Christianity, which opened the gates of Heaven to the Barbarians, brought a significant shift in their moral and political condition. They also gained the ability to read and write, which was crucial for a religion rooted in a sacred text; as they explored divine truth, their minds naturally expanded through exposure to history, nature, arts, and society. The translation of the Scriptures into their native language, which aided their conversion, surely sparked interest among their clergy to read the original texts, understand the church's sacred liturgy, and study the writings of the church fathers to trace ecclesiastical tradition. These spiritual gifts were preserved in Greek and Latin, which held invaluable records of ancient knowledge. The timeless works of Virgil, Cicero, and Livy, accessible to the Christian Barbarians, maintained a silent connection between the reign of Augustus and the times of Clovis and Charlemagne. The memory of a more perfect era inspired human ambition, and the fire of learning was quietly kept alive to nurture and illuminate the mature age of the Western world. Even at Christianity's most corrupt moments, the Barbarians could learn justice from the law and compassion from the gospel; and if they struggled to comprehend their duties or manage their passions, their conscience often held them back, and remorse frequently punished them. However, the direct influence of religion was not as strong as the holy communion, which bonded them with their Christian peers in spiritual friendship. This sense of unity helped secure their loyalty to the Romans, ease the horrors of war, moderate the arrogance of conquest, and maintain, during the empire's decline, a lasting respect for Rome's name and institutions. During pagan times, the priests in Gaul and Germany ruled over the people and influenced the magistrates; the fervent converts transferred equal or even more profound devotion to the Christian pontiffs. The bishops’ sacred status was bolstered by their worldly possessions; they secured honorable positions in legislative assemblies with soldiers and free people; and it was both their duty and interest to soften the fierce spirit of the Barbarians through peaceful counsel. The continual communication among the Latin clergy, frequent pilgrimages to Rome and Jerusalem, and the increasing power of the popes helped solidify the Christian community's unity, gradually leading to the development of similar customs and common laws that set apart the independent, and often antagonistic, nations of modern Europe from the rest of humanity.
But the operation of these causes was checked and retarded by the unfortunate accident, which infused a deadly poison into the cup of Salvation. Whatever might be the early sentiments of Ulphilas, his connections with the empire and the church were formed during the reign of Arianism. The apostle of the Goths subscribed the creed of Rimini; professed with freedom, and perhaps with sincerity, that the Son was not equal, or consubstantial to the Father; communicated these errors to the clergy and people; and infected the Barbaric world with a heresy, which the great Theodosius proscribed and extinguished among the Romans. The temper and understanding of the new proselytes were not adapted to metaphysical subtilties; but they strenuously maintained, what they had piously received, as the pure and genuine doctrines of Christianity. The advantage of preaching and expounding the Scriptures in the Teutonic language promoted the apostolic labors of Ulphilas and his successors; and they ordained a competent number of bishops and presbyters for the instruction of the kindred tribes. The Ostrogoths, the Burgundians, the Suevi, and the Vandals, who had listened to the eloquence of the Latin clergy, preferred the more intelligible lessons of their domestic teachers; and Arianism was adopted as the national faith of the warlike converts, who were seated on the ruins of the Western empire. This irreconcilable difference of religion was a perpetual source of jealousy and hatred; and the reproach of Barbarian was imbittered by the more odious epithet of Heretic. The heroes of the North, who had submitted, with some reluctance, to believe that all their ancestors were in hell, were astonished and exasperated to learn, that they themselves had only changed the mode of their eternal condemnation. Instead of the smooth applause, which Christian kings are accustomed to expect from their royal prelates, the orthodox bishops and their clergy were in a state of opposition to the Arian courts; and their indiscreet opposition frequently became criminal, and might sometimes be dangerous. The pulpit, that safe and sacred organ of sedition, resounded with the names of Pharaoh and Holofernes; the public discontent was inflamed by the hope or promise of a glorious deliverance; and the seditious saints were tempted to promote the accomplishment of their own predictions. Notwithstanding these provocations, the Catholics of Gaul, Spain, and Italy, enjoyed, under the reign of the Arians, the free and peaceful exercise of their religion. Their haughty masters respected the zeal of a numerous people, resolved to die at the foot of their altars; and the example of their devout constancy was admired and imitated by the Barbarians themselves. The conquerors evaded, however, the disgraceful reproach, or confession, of fear, by attributing their toleration to the liberal motives of reason and humanity; and while they affected the language, they imperceptibly imbibed the spirit, of genuine Christianity.
But the actions of these forces were hindered and slowed down by the unfortunate accident that introduced a deadly poison into the cup of Salvation. Whatever Ulphilas's initial beliefs might have been, his connections with the empire and the church were established during the reign of Arianism. The apostle of the Goths accepted the creed of Rimini; he openly declared, perhaps even sincerely, that the Son was not equal or consubstantial to the Father; he spread these errors among the clergy and the people, infecting the Barbaric world with a heresy that the great Theodosius outlawed and eradicated among the Romans. The mindset and understanding of the new converts weren't suited for complex metaphysical ideas; however, they firmly upheld what they had received as the pure and genuine teachings of Christianity. The benefit of preaching and interpreting the Scriptures in the Teutonic language aided the apostolic efforts of Ulphilas and his successors, who established a sufficient number of bishops and presbyters to instruct the related tribes. The Ostrogoths, Burgundians, Suevi, and Vandals, who had listened to the Latin clergy, preferred the clearer lessons from their local teachers; Arianism became the national faith of the warlike converts who had settled on the ruins of the Western empire. This deep religious divide became a constant source of jealousy and animosity; the term Barbarian was made worse by the more hateful label of Heretic. The northern heroes, who had reluctantly accepted that all their ancestors were in hell, were shocked and angry to find out that they had merely changed their mode of eternal condemnation. Instead of the smooth praise that Christian kings typically expect from their royal clergy, the orthodox bishops and their clergy were opposed to the Arian courts; their reckless opposition often became criminal and sometimes dangerous. The pulpit, that safe and sacred platform for rebellion, echoed with the names of Pharaoh and Holofernes; public discontent was stirred up by the hope or promise of a glorious deliverance, and the rebellious saints were tempted to bring about the fulfillment of their own predictions. Despite these provocations, the Catholics of Gaul, Spain, and Italy enjoyed the free and peaceful practice of their religion during the reign of the Arians. Their arrogant rulers respected the fervor of a large populace, determined to die at the foot of their altars; the example of their devoted resilience was admired and emulated by the Barbarians themselves. However, the conquerors avoided the shameful accusation or admission of fear by attributing their tolerance to rational and humane motives; and while they adopted the language, they subtly absorbed the spirit of genuine Christianity.
The peace of the church was sometimes interrupted. The Catholics were indiscreet, the Barbarians were impatient; and the partial acts of severity or injustice, which had been recommended by the Arian clergy, were exaggerated by the orthodox writers. The guilt of persecution may be imputed to Euric, king of the Visigoths; who suspended the exercise of ecclesiastical, or, at least, of episcopal functions; and punished the popular bishops of Aquitain with imprisonment, exile, and confiscation. But the cruel and absurd enterprise of subduing the minds of a whole people was undertaken by the Vandals alone. Genseric himself, in his early youth, had renounced the orthodox communion; and the apostate could neither grant, nor expect, a sincere forgiveness. He was exasperated to find that the Africans, who had fled before him in the field, still presumed to dispute his will in synods and churches; and his ferocious mind was incapable of fear or of compassion. His Catholic subjects were oppressed by intolerant laws and arbitrary punishments. The language of Genseric was furious and formidable; the knowledge of his intentions might justify the most unfavorable interpretation of his actions; and the Arians were reproached with the frequent executions which stained the palace and the dominions of the tyrant. Arms and ambition were, however, the ruling passions of the monarch of the sea. But Hunneric, his inglorious son, who seemed to inherit only his vices, tormented the Catholics with the same unrelenting fury which had been fatal to his brother, his nephews, and the friends and favorites of his father; and even to the Arian patriarch, who was inhumanly burnt alive in the midst of Carthage. The religious war was preceded and prepared by an insidious truce; persecution was made the serious and important business of the Vandal court; and the loathsome disease which hastened the death of Hunneric, revenged the injuries, without contributing to the deliverance, of the church. The throne of Africa was successively filled by the two nephews of Hunneric; by Gundamund, who reigned about twelve, and by Thrasimund, who governed the nation about twenty-seven, years. Their administration was hostile and oppressive to the orthodox party. Gundamund appeared to emulate, or even to surpass, the cruelty of his uncle; and, if at length he relented, if he recalled the bishops, and restored the freedom of Athanasian worship, a premature death intercepted the benefits of his tardy clemency. His brother, Thrasimund, was the greatest and most accomplished of the Vandal kings, whom he excelled in beauty, prudence, and magnanimity of soul. But this magnanimous character was degraded by his intolerant zeal and deceitful clemency. Instead of threats and tortures, he employed the gentle, but efficacious, powers of seduction. Wealth, dignity, and the royal favor, were the liberal rewards of apostasy; the Catholics, who had violated the laws, might purchase their pardon by the renunciation of their faith; and whenever Thrasimund meditated any rigorous measure, he patiently waited till the indiscretion of his adversaries furnished him with a specious opportunity. Bigotry was his last sentiment in the hour of death; and he exacted from his successor a solemn oath, that he would never tolerate the sectaries of Athanasius. But his successor, Hilderic, the gentle son of the savage Hunneric, preferred the duties of humanity and justice to the vain obligation of an impious oath; and his accession was gloriously marked by the restoration of peace and universal freedom. The throne of that virtuous, though feeble monarch, was usurped by his cousin Gelimer, a zealous Arian: but the Vandal kingdom, before he could enjoy or abuse his power, was subverted by the arms of Belisarius; and the orthodox party retaliated the injuries which they had endured.
The peace of the church was sometimes disrupted. The Catholics were indiscreet, and the Barbarians were impatient; the acts of severity or injustice recommended by the Arian clergy were exaggerated by the orthodox writers. The guilt of persecution can be attributed to Euric, king of the Visigoths, who stopped the exercise of ecclesiastical, or at least episcopal, functions; and he punished the popular bishops of Aquitaine with imprisonment, exile, and confiscation. However, the cruel and absurd campaign to subjugate the minds of an entire people was undertaken solely by the Vandals. Genseric himself, in his youth, had abandoned the orthodox communion; the apostate could neither grant nor expect sincere forgiveness. He was infuriated to discover that the Africans, who had fled from him in battle, still dared to challenge his authority in synods and churches; his fierce nature could neither know fear nor compassion. His Catholic subjects faced oppression through intolerant laws and arbitrary punishments. Genseric's words were filled with rage and intimidation; knowledge of his intentions could justify the worst interpretations of his actions, and the Arians were blamed for the frequent executions that stained the palace and the territory of the tyrant. However, arms and ambition were the dominant passions of the king of the sea. But Hunneric, his dishonorable son, who seemed to have inherited only his father's vices, tormented the Catholics with the same relentless fury that had harmed his brother, his nephews, and the friends and favorites of his father; even the Arian patriarch was inhumanely burned alive in the heart of Carthage. The religious war was preceded by a deceptive truce; persecution became the serious and vital business of the Vandal court; the disgusting illness that hastened Hunneric's death avenged the injuries but did not help free the church. The throne of Africa was successively held by Hunneric's two nephews; Gundamund, who reigned for about twelve years, and Thrasimund, who ruled for about twenty-seven years. Their rule was hostile and oppressive to the orthodox faction. Gundamund seemed to emulate, or even surpass, his uncle's cruelty; though eventually he relented, recalling the bishops and restoring the freedom of Athanasian worship, a premature death cut short the benefits of his late mercy. His brother Thrasimund was the greatest and most accomplished of the Vandal kings, excelling in beauty, wisdom, and generosity of spirit. But this noble character was tainted by his intolerant zeal and deceptive clemency. Instead of using threats and torture, he relied on the softer yet effective power of persuasion. Wealth, status, and royal favor were generous rewards for apostasy; Catholics who violated the laws could buy their pardon by abandoning their faith; whenever Thrasimund planned a harsh measure, he patiently waited for the indiscretion of his opponents to give him a seemingly justifiable opportunity. Bigotry was his final sentiment at the time of death; he demanded that his successor swear an oath to never tolerate the sectarians of Athanasius. But his successor, Hilderic, the gentle son of the savage Hunneric, prioritized humanity and justice over the empty obligation of a wicked oath; his rise to power was gloriously marked by the restoration of peace and universal freedom. The throne of that virtuous, albeit weak, monarch was seized by his cousin Gelimer, a fervent Arian: but before Gelimer could enjoy or abuse his power, the Vandal kingdom was brought down by Belisarius's army, and the orthodox party retaliated against the injuries they had suffered.
The passionate declamations of the Catholics, the sole historians of this persecution, cannot afford any distinct series of causes and events; any impartial view of the characters, or counsels; but the most remarkable circumstances that deserve either credit or notice, may be referred to the following heads; I. In the original law, which is still extant, Hunneric expressly declares, (and the declaration appears to be correct,) that he had faithfully transcribed the regulations and penalties of the Imperial edicts, against the heretical congregations, the clergy, and the people, who dissented from the established religion. If the rights of conscience had been understood, the Catholics must have condemned their past conduct or acquiesced in their actual suffering. But they still persisted to refuse the indulgence which they claimed. While they trembled under the lash of persecution, they praised the laudable severity of Hunneric himself, who burnt or banished great numbers of Manichæans; and they rejected, with horror, the ignominious compromise, that the disciples of Arius and of Athanasius should enjoy a reciprocal and similar toleration in the territories of the Romans, and in those of the Vandals. II. The practice of a conference, which the Catholics had so frequently used to insult and punish their obstinate antagonists, was retorted against themselves. At the command of Hunneric, four hundred and sixty-six orthodox bishops assembled at Carthage; but when they were admitted into the hall of audience, they had the mortification of beholding the Arian Cyrila exalted on the patriarchal throne. The disputants were separated, after the mutual and ordinary reproaches of noise and silence, of delay and precipitation, of military force and of popular clamor. One martyr and one confessor were selected among the Catholic bishops; twenty-eight escaped by flight, and eighty-eight by conformity; forty-six were sent into Corsica to cut timber for the royal navy; and three hundred and two were banished to the different parts of Africa, exposed to the insults of their enemies, and carefully deprived of all the temporal and spiritual comforts of life. The hardships of ten years' exile must have reduced their numbers; and if they had complied with the law of Thrasimund, which prohibited any episcopal consecrations, the orthodox church of Africa must have expired with the lives of its actual members. They disobeyed, and their disobedience was punished by a second exile of two hundred and twenty bishops into Sardinia; where they languished fifteen years, till the accession of the gracious Hilderic. The two islands were judiciously chosen by the malice of their Arian tyrants. Seneca, from his own experience, has deplored and exaggerated the miserable state of Corsica, and the plenty of Sardinia was overbalanced by the unwholesome quality of the air. III. The zeal of Generic and his successors, for the conversion of the Catholics, must have rendered them still more jealous to guard the purity of the Vandal faith. Before the churches were finally shut, it was a crime to appear in a Barbarian dress; and those who presumed to neglect the royal mandate were rudely dragged backwards by their long hair. The palatine officers, who refused to profess the religion of their prince, were ignominiously stripped of their honors and employments; banished to Sardinia and Sicily; or condemned to the servile labors of slaves and peasants in the fields of Utica. In the districts which had been peculiarly allotted to the Vandals, the exercise of the Catholic worship was more strictly prohibited; and severe penalties were denounced against the guilt both of the missionary and the proselyte. By these arts, the faith of the Barbarians was preserved, and their zeal was inflamed: they discharged, with devout fury, the office of spies, informers, or executioners; and whenever their cavalry took the field, it was the favorite amusement of the march to defile the churches, and to insult the clergy of the adverse faction. IV. The citizens who had been educated in the luxury of the Roman province, were delivered, with exquisite cruelty, to the Moors of the desert. A venerable train of bishops, presbyters, and deacons, with a faithful crowd of four thousand and ninety-six persons, whose guilt is not precisely ascertained, were torn from their native homes, by the command of Hunneric. During the night they were confined, like a herd of cattle, amidst their own ordure: during the day they pursued their march over the burning sands; and if they fainted under the heat and fatigue, they were goaded, or dragged along, till they expired in the hands of their tormentors. These unhappy exiles, when they reached the Moorish huts, might excite the compassion of a people, whose native humanity was neither improved by reason, nor corrupted by fanaticism: but if they escaped the dangers, they were condemned to share the distress of a savage life. V. It is incumbent on the authors of persecution previously to reflect, whether they are determined to support it in the last extreme. They excite the flame which they strive to extinguish; and it soon becomes necessary to chastise the contumacy, as well as the crime, of the offender. The fine, which he is unable or unwilling to discharge, exposes his person to the severity of the law; and his contempt of lighter penalties suggests the use and propriety of capital punishment. Through the veil of fiction and declamation we may clearly perceive, that the Catholics more especially under the reign of Hunneric, endured the most cruel and ignominious treatment. Respectable citizens, noble matrons, and consecrated virgins, were stripped naked, and raised in the air by pulleys, with a weight suspended at their feet. In this painful attitude their naked bodies were torn with scourges, or burnt in the most tender parts with red-hot plates of iron. The amputation of the ears the nose, the tongue, and the right hand, was inflicted by the Arians; and although the precise number cannot be defined, it is evident that many persons, among whom a bishop and a proconsul may be named, were entitled to the crown of martyrdom. The same honor has been ascribed to the memory of Count Sebastian, who professed the Nicene creed with unshaken constancy; and Genseric might detest, as a heretic, the brave and ambitious fugitive whom he dreaded as a rival. VI. A new mode of conversion, which might subdue the feeble, and alarm the timorous, was employed by the Arian ministers. They imposed, by fraud or violence, the rites of baptism; and punished the apostasy of the Catholics, if they disclaimed this odious and profane ceremony, which scandalously violated the freedom of the will, and the unity of the sacrament. The hostile sects had formerly allowed the validity of each other's baptism; and the innovation, so fiercely maintained by the Vandals, can be imputed only to the example and advice of the Donatists. VII. The Arian clergy surpassed in religious cruelty the king and his Vandals; but they were incapable of cultivating the spiritual vineyard, which they were so desirous to possess. A patriarch might seat himself on the throne of Carthage; some bishops, in the principal cities, might usurp the place of their rivals; but the smallness of their numbers, and their ignorance of the Latin language, disqualified the Barbarians for the ecclesiastical ministry of a great church; and the Africans, after the loss of their orthodox pastors, were deprived of the public exercise of Christianity. VIII. The emperors were the natural protectors of the Homoousian doctrine; and the faithful people of Africa, both as Romans and as Catholics, preferred their lawful sovereignty to the usurpation of the Barbarous heretics. During an interval of peace and friendship, Hunneric restored the cathedral of Carthage; at the intercession of Zeno, who reigned in the East, and of Placidia, the daughter and relict of emperors, and the sister of the queen of the Vandals. But this decent regard was of short duration; and the haughty tyrant displayed his contempt for the religion of the empire, by studiously arranging the bloody images of persecution, in all the principal streets through which the Roman ambassador must pass in his way to the palace. An oath was required from the bishops, who were assembled at Carthage, that they would support the succession of his son Hilderic, and that they would renounce all foreign or transmarine correspondence. This engagement, consistent, as it should seem, with their moral and religious duties, was refused by the more sagacious members of the assembly. Their refusal, faintly colored by the pretence that it is unlawful for a Christian to swear, must provoke the suspicions of a jealous tyrant.
The passionate speeches of the Catholics, the only historians of this persecution, don't provide a clear sequence of causes and events; nor do they offer an unbiased perspective on the personalities or decisions involved. However, the most notable points that deserve attention or consideration can be summarized as follows: I. In the original law, which still exists, Hunneric clearly states (and this statement seems accurate) that he faithfully recorded the rules and penalties of the Imperial edicts against heretical groups, the clergy, and the people who disagreed with the established religion. If the rights of conscience had been acknowledged, the Catholics would have had to condemn their past actions or accept their current suffering. Instead, they continued to deny the leniency they sought. While suffering under persecution, they praised Hunneric's commendable severity, who burned or exiled many Manichaeans; they also rejected, with horror, the disgraceful compromise allowing the followers of Arius and Athanasius to enjoy mutual toleration in Roman and Vandal territories. II. The practice of conferences, often used by the Catholics to insult and punish their stubborn opponents, was turned back on them. At Hunneric's command, four hundred and sixty-six Orthodox bishops gathered at Carthage; but upon entering the hall, they were humiliated to find the Arian Cyrila elevated on the patriarchal throne. The disputants were separated after the usual complaints of noise and silence, delay and rush, military force and public uproar. One martyr and one confessor were chosen from the Catholic bishops; twenty-eight escaped by fleeing, eighty-eight conformed, forty-six were sent to Corsica to cut timber for the royal navy, and three hundred and two were exiled to various parts of Africa, facing insults from their enemies and stripped of all earthly and spiritual comforts. The hardships of ten years of exile likely dwindled their numbers; had they followed Thrasimund's law, which banned any episcopal consecrations, the Orthodox church in Africa would have died with its living members. They disobeyed, and their disobedience led to a second exile of two hundred and twenty bishops to Sardinia, where they languished for fifteen years until the gentle Hilderic took power. The two islands were chosen wisely by their Arian oppressors. Seneca, drawing from his own experiences, lamented the dire situation in Corsica, while Sardinia's abundance was overshadowed by the unhealthy air. III. The zeal of Generic and his successors for converting Catholics made them even more protective of the purity of the Vandal faith. Before the churches were finally closed, it was a crime to wear Barbarian clothing; those who disregarded the royal command were roughly pulled back by their long hair. The court officials who refused to adopt their prince's religion were dishonorably stripped of their titles and positions; they were exiled to Sardinia and Sicily or condemned to work as slaves and peasants in the fields of Utica. In the regions specifically assigned to the Vandals, Catholic worship was more strictly banned, and harsh penalties were imposed on both the missionary and the convert. These tactics preserved the Barbarians' faith and intensified their zeal: driven by fervent devotion, they acted as spies, informers, or executioners; whenever their cavalry marched, it was a favored pastime to desecrate churches and insult the clergy of the opposing side. IV. The citizens raised in the luxury of the Roman province were cruelly handed over to the Moors of the desert. A venerable group of bishops, presbyters, and deacons, along with a faithful crowd of four thousand and ninety-six people whose guilt remains uncertain, were forcibly removed from their homes by Hunneric's command. They were confined at night like cattle, in their own filth; during the day, they marched over scorching sands; and if they collapsed from the heat and exhaustion, they were prodded or dragged along until they perished in the hands of their tormentors. These miserable exiles, when they reached the Moorish huts, might have stirred compassion among a people whose natural humanity was neither enlightened by reason nor corrupted by fanaticism: but if they survived the dangers, they were destined to endure the struggles of a savage existence. V. Those who perpetrate persecution must first consider whether they intend to maintain it to the bitter end. They ignite the flame they attempt to extinguish; soon, it becomes necessary to punish not just the crime but also the stubbornness of the offender. The fine, which one cannot or will not pay, exposes them to the rigor of the law; and their disregard for lesser penalties suggests the justification of capital punishment. Behind a facade of fiction and rhetoric, it’s clear that Catholics, especially under Hunneric's rule, faced brutal and shameful treatment. Respectable citizens, noble women, and consecrated virgins were stripped bare and hoisted into the air by pulleys, with weights tied to their feet. In this torturous position, their exposed bodies were whipped or burned in their most sensitive areas with red-hot iron plates. The Arians inflicted amputations of ears, noses, tongues, and right hands; while the exact count may remain unclear, it is evident that many individuals, including a bishop and a proconsul, deserve the title of martyr. The same honor has also been granted to Count Sebastian, who professed the Nicene creed with unwavering conviction; Genseric, as a heretic, likely detested this brave and ambitious fugitive whom he saw as a rival. VI. A new method of conversion, designed to subdue the weak and alarm the fearful, was employed by the Arian ministers. They forced baptism through deceit or violence and punished Catholics for rejecting this repugnant and profane ceremony, which scandalously violated free will and the unity of the sacrament. The opposing sects had previously acknowledged each other's baptisms as valid; this innovation, fiercely upheld by the Vandals, can only be attributed to the influence and guidance of the Donatists. VII. The Arian clergy surpassed the king and his Vandals in religious cruelty; however, they were incapable of nurturing the spiritual vineyard they coveted. A patriarch could occupy the throne of Carthage; some bishops in major cities could take over the positions of their rivals; but their small numbers and lack of proficiency in Latin disqualified the Barbarians from serving in the ecclesiastical ministry of a significant church, leaving Africans bereft of public Christian practices after losing their Orthodox pastors. VIII. The emperors were the natural defenders of the Homoousian doctrine; the faithful people of Africa, as both Romans and Catholics, preferred their legitimate sovereignty over the usurpation by the barbaric heretics. During a period of peace and goodwill, Hunneric restored the cathedral of Carthage, thanks to the intercession of Zeno, who ruled in the East, and Placidia, the daughter and widow of emperors, and sister of the Vandal queen. However, this respectful gesture was short-lived; the arrogant tyrant revealed his disdain for the religion of the empire by deliberately displaying gruesome images of persecution along all the main streets the Roman ambassador had to pass on his way to the palace. An oath was demanded from the bishops meeting in Carthage, pledging to support his son Hilderic's succession and renounce all foreign or transmarine connections. This commitment, which seemed to align with their moral and religious duties, was rejected by the more discerning members of the assembly. Their refusal, weakly justified by claiming it was unlawful for a Christian to swear, stirred the suspicions of a watchful tyrant.
Chapter XXXVII: Conversion Of The Barbarians To Christianity.—Part IV.
The Catholics, oppressed by royal and military force, were far superior to their adversaries in numbers and learning. With the same weapons which the Greek and Latin fathers had already provided for the Arian controversy, they repeatedly silenced, or vanquished, the fierce and illiterate successors of Ulphilas. The consciousness of their own superiority might have raised them above the arts and passions of religious warfare. Yet, instead of assuming such honorable pride, the orthodox theologians were tempted, by the assurance of impunity, to compose fictions, which must be stigmatized with the epithets of fraud and forgery. They ascribed their own polemical works to the most venerable names of Christian antiquity; the characters of Athanasius and Augustin were awkwardly personated by Vigilius and his disciples; and the famous creed, which so clearly expounds the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation, is deduced, with strong probability, from this African school. Even the Scriptures themselves were profaned by their rash and sacrilegious hands. The memorable text, which asserts the unity of the three who bear witness in heaven, is condemned by the universal silence of the orthodox fathers, ancient versions, and authentic manuscripts. It was first alleged by the Catholic bishops whom Hunneric summoned to the conference of Carthage. An allegorical interpretation, in the form, perhaps, of a marginal note, invaded the text of the Latin Bibles, which were renewed and corrected in a dark period of ten centuries. After the invention of printing, the editors of the Greek Testament yielded to their own prejudices, or those of the times; and the pious fraud, which was embraced with equal zeal at Rome and at Geneva, has been infinitely multiplied in every country and every language of modern Europe.
The Catholics, oppressed by royal and military power, were far superior to their opponents in numbers and knowledge. Using the same arguments that the Greek and Latin fathers had provided for the Arian controversy, they repeatedly silenced or defeated the fierce and uneducated successors of Ulphilas. Their awareness of their own superiority could have elevated them above the tactics and emotions of religious conflict. Yet, instead of taking pride in their position, the orthodox theologians were tempted, by the promise of being unpunished, to create fabrications that rightly deserve to be called fraudulent and forged. They attributed their own argumentative works to the most respected names in Christian history; the characters of Athanasius and Augustine were awkwardly impersonated by Vigilius and his followers; and the well-known creed that clearly explains the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation is probably derived from this African school. Even the Scriptures themselves were violated by their reckless and sacrilegious actions. The notable passage that claims the unity of the three who bear witness in heaven is ignored by the universal silence of the orthodox fathers, ancient translations, and credible manuscripts. It was first stated by the Catholic bishops whom Hunneric called to the conference of Carthage. An allegorical interpretation, perhaps as a marginal note, infiltrated the text of the Latin Bibles, which were renewed and corrected during a dark period of ten centuries. After the invention of printing, the editors of the Greek Testament succumbed to their own biases or those of the era; and the pious fraud, which was embraced with equal enthusiasm in Rome and Geneva, has been greatly multiplied across every country and language in modern Europe.
The example of fraud must excite suspicion: and the specious miracles by which the African Catholics have defended the truth and justice of their cause, may be ascribed, with more reason, to their own industry, than to the visible protection of Heaven. Yet the historian, who views this religious conflict with an impartial eye, may condescend to mention one preternatural event, which will edify the devout, and surprise the incredulous. Tipasa, a maritime colony of Mauritania, sixteen miles to the east of Cæsarea, had been distinguished, in every age, by the orthodox zeal of its inhabitants. They had braved the fury of the Donatists; they resisted, or eluded, the tyranny of the Arians. The town was deserted on the approach of an heretical bishop: most of the inhabitants who could procure ships passed over to the coast of Spain; and the unhappy remnant, refusing all communion with the usurper, still presumed to hold their pious, but illegal, assemblies. Their disobedience exasperated the cruelty of Hunneric. A military count was despatched from Carthage to Tipasa: he collected the Catholics in the Forum, and, in the presence of the whole province, deprived the guilty of their right hands and their tongues. But the holy confessors continued to speak without tongues; and this miracle is attested by Victor, an African bishop, who published a history of the persecution within two years after the event. "If any one," says Victor, "should doubt of the truth, let him repair to Constantinople, and listen to the clear and perfect language of Restitutus, the sub-deacon, one of these glorious sufferers, who is now lodged in the palace of the emperor Zeno, and is respected by the devout empress." At Constantinople we are astonished to find a cool, a learned, and unexceptionable witness, without interest, and without passion. Æneas of Gaza, a Platonic philosopher, has accurately described his own observations on these African sufferers. "I saw them myself: I heard them speak: I diligently inquired by what means such an articulate voice could be formed without any organ of speech: I used my eyes to examine the report of my ears; I opened their mouth, and saw that the whole tongue had been completely torn away by the roots; an operation which the physicians generally suppose to be mortal." The testimony of Æneas of Gaza might be confirmed by the superfluous evidence of the emperor Justinian, in a perpetual edict; of Count Marcellinus, in his Chronicle of the times; and of Pope Gregory the First, who had resided at Constantinople, as the minister of the Roman pontiff. They all lived within the compass of a century; and they all appeal to their personal knowledge, or the public notoriety, for the truth of a miracle, which was repeated in several instances, displayed on the greatest theatre of the world, and submitted, during a series of years, to the calm examination of the senses. This supernatural gift of the African confessors, who spoke without tongues, will command the assent of those, and of those only, who already believe, that their language was pure and orthodox. But the stubborn mind of an infidel, is guarded by secret, incurable suspicion; and the Arian, or Socinian, who has seriously rejected the doctrine of a Trinity, will not be shaken by the most plausible evidence of an Athanasian miracle.
The example of fraud should raise suspicion: the seemingly miraculous events that the African Catholics used to defend their truth and justice can be more reasonably attributed to their own efforts rather than the direct intervention of Heaven. However, a historian who looks at this religious conflict impartially might mention one extraordinary event that will inspire the devout and surprise the skeptical. Tipasa, a coastal colony in Mauritania, sixteen miles east of Cæsarea, has always been known for the strong religious zeal of its people. They faced the wrath of the Donatists and resisted or avoided the tyranny of the Arians. When a heretical bishop approached, the town was abandoned; most of the residents who could managed to escape to Spain, while the unfortunate few who remained refused to acknowledge the usurper and continued their prayer meetings, though they were technically illegal. Their defiance angered Hunneric, who sent a military count from Carthage to Tipasa. He rounded up the Catholics in the Forum and, in front of the entire province, cut off their right hands and tongues. Yet, the holy confessors continued to speak without tongues; this miracle is documented by Victor, an African bishop, who wrote about the persecution less than two years after it happened. "If anyone," says Victor, "doubts the truth of this, let them go to Constantinople and listen to the clear and articulate speech of Restitutus, the sub-deacon, one of these noble martyrs, who is now in the palace of Emperor Zeno and is held in high regard by the devout empress." In Constantinople, we find a calm, educated, and reliable witness with no personal stake or bias. Æneas of Gaza, a Platonic philosopher, accurately described his own observations of these African martyrs. "I saw them myself: I heard them speak: I thoroughly investigated how such a clear voice could be produced without any speech organ: I used my eyes to confirm what I heard; I opened their mouths and saw that their tongues had been completely torn out from the roots; a procedure that physicians generally consider fatal." The testimony of Æneas of Gaza can be further supported by the redundant evidence of Emperor Justinian in a permanent edict, Count Marcellinus in his Chronicle, and Pope Gregory the First, who had lived in Constantinople as the Roman pontiff's representative. They all lived within a century of each other and referred to their personal knowledge or public recognition to confirm the truth of a miracle that occurred repeatedly, showcased on the grandest stage of the world, and subjected, over many years, to careful scrutiny. This supernatural ability of the African confessors to speak without tongues will only convince those who already believe their language was pure and orthodox. However, the stubborn mind of a nonbeliever is protected by hidden, unshakeable doubt; and an Arian or Socinian who has firmly dismissed the doctrine of the Trinity won't be swayed by the most convincing evidence of an Athanasian miracle.
The Vandals and the Ostrogoths persevered in the profession of Arianism till the final ruin of the kingdoms which they had founded in Africa and Italy. The Barbarians of Gaul submitted to the orthodox dominion of the Franks; and Spain was restored to the Catholic church by the voluntary conversion of the Visigoths.
The Vandals and the Ostrogoths stuck to Arianism until the complete collapse of the kingdoms they established in Africa and Italy. The Barbarians of Gaul accepted the orthodox rule of the Franks, and Spain was returned to the Catholic Church through the voluntary conversion of the Visigoths.
This salutary revolution was hastened by the example of a royal martyr, whom our calmer reason may style an ungrateful rebel. Leovigild, the Gothic monarch of Spain, deserved the respect of his enemies, and the love of his subjects; the Catholics enjoyed a free toleration, and his Arian synods attempted, without much success, to reconcile their scruples by abolishing the unpopular rite of a second baptism. His eldest son Hermenegild, who was invested by his father with the royal diadem, and the fair principality of Baetica, contracted an honorable and orthodox alliance with a Merovingian princess, the daughter of Sigebert, king of Austrasia, and of the famous Brunechild. The beauteous Ingundis, who was no more than thirteen years of age, was received, beloved, and persecuted, in the Arian court of Toledo; and her religious constancy was alternately assaulted with blandishments and violence by Goisvintha, the Gothic queen, who abused the double claim of maternal authority. Incensed by her resistance, Goisvintha seized the Catholic princess by her long hair, inhumanly dashed her against the ground, kicked her till she was covered with blood, and at last gave orders that she should be stripped, and thrown into a basin, or fish-pond. Love and honor might excite Hermenegild to resent this injurious treatment of his bride; and he was gradually persuaded that Ingundis suffered for the cause of divine truth. Her tender complaints, and the weighty arguments of Leander, archbishop of Seville, accomplished his conversion and the heir of the Gothic monarchy was initiated in the Nicene faith by the solemn rites of confirmation. The rash youth, inflamed by zeal, and perhaps by ambition, was tempted to violate the duties of a son and a subject; and the Catholics of Spain, although they could not complain of persecution, applauded his pious rebellion against an heretical father. The civil war was protracted by the long and obstinate sieges of Merida, Cordova, and Seville, which had strenuously espoused the party of Hermenegild He invited the orthodox Barbarians, the Seuvi, and the Franks, to the destruction of his native land; he solicited the dangerous aid of the Romans, who possessed Africa, and a part of the Spanish coast; and his holy ambassador, the archbishop Leander, effectually negotiated in person with the Byzantine court. But the hopes of the Catholics were crushed by the active diligence of the monarch who commanded the troops and treasures of Spain; and the guilty Hermenegild, after his vain attempts to resist or to escape, was compelled to surrender himself into the hands of an incensed father. Leovigild was still mindful of that sacred character; and the rebel, despoiled of the regal ornaments, was still permitted, in a decent exile, to profess the Catholic religion. His repeated and unsuccessful treasons at length provoked the indignation of the Gothic king; and the sentence of death, which he pronounced with apparent reluctance, was privately executed in the tower of Seville. The inflexible constancy with which he refused to accept the Arian communion, as the price of his safety, may excuse the honors that have been paid to the memory of St. Hermenegild. His wife and infant son were detained by the Romans in ignominious captivity; and this domestic misfortune tarnished the glories of Leovigild, and imbittered the last moments of his life.
This important revolution was accelerated by the example of a royal martyr, whom our more rational perspective may consider an ungrateful rebel. Leovigild, the Gothic king of Spain, earned the respect of his enemies and the love of his subjects; Catholics experienced relative tolerance, and his Arian councils tried, without much success, to resolve their issues by eliminating the unpopular practice of a second baptism. His oldest son, Hermenegild, who was crowned by his father and given the charming principality of Baetica, formed a respectable and orthodox alliance with a Merovingian princess, the daughter of Sigebert, king of Austrasia, and the famous Brunechild. The beautiful Ingundis, who was only thirteen, was welcomed, cherished, and persecuted in the Arian court of Toledo; and her religious steadfastness was attacked alternately with flattery and violence by Goisvintha, the Gothic queen, who abused her dual claim of maternal authority. Furious at her defiance, Goisvintha grabbed the Catholic princess by her long hair, brutally threw her to the ground, kicked her until she was covered in blood, and eventually ordered that she be stripped and tossed into a basin or fish-pond. Love and honor might push Hermenegild to react against this mistreatment of his bride; he gradually became convinced that Ingundis suffered for the sake of divine truth. Her heartfelt complaints, along with strong arguments from Leander, the archbishop of Seville, led to his conversion, and the heir to the Gothic throne was initiated into the Nicene faith through the formal rites of confirmation. The impulsive young man, filled with zeal and perhaps ambition, was tempted to betray the responsibilities of a son and a subject; and while the Catholics of Spain could not claim persecution, they applauded his pious rebellion against a heretical father. The civil war dragged on due to the long and fierce sieges of Merida, Cordova, and Seville, which strongly supported Hermenegild's cause. He invited the orthodox Barbarians, the Seuvi and the Franks, to help destroy his homeland; he sought the risky support of the Romans, who ruled Africa and parts of the Spanish coast; and his holy ambassador, Archbishop Leander, successfully negotiated in person with the Byzantine court. However, the Catholics' hopes were dashed by the active diligence of the king who controlled the troops and resources of Spain; and the guilty Hermenegild, after futile attempts to resist or escape, was forced to surrender to an enraged father. Leovigild still kept the sacred character in mind; and though the rebel was stripped of royal adornments, he was allowed, during a respectable exile, to practice the Catholic faith. His repeated and unsuccessful betrayals eventually stirred the wrath of the Gothic king; and the death sentence, which he imposed with obvious reluctance, was carried out privately in the tower of Seville. The unyielding determination he displayed in refusing to accept Arian communion as a price for his safety may explain the honors given to the memory of St. Hermenegild. His wife and infant son were held captive by the Romans in shameful circumstances; and this family tragedy marred the accomplishments of Leovigild and soured the final moments of his life.
His son and successor, Recared, the first Catholic king of Spain, had imbibed the faith of his unfortunate brother, which he supported with more prudence and success. Instead of revolting against his father, Recared patiently expected the hour of his death. Instead of condemning his memory, he piously supposed, that the dying monarch had abjured the errors of Arianism, and recommended to his son the conversion of the Gothic nation. To accomplish that salutary end, Recared convened an assembly of the Arian clergy and nobles, declared himself a Catholic, and exhorted them to imitate the example of their prince. The laborious interpretation of doubtful texts, or the curious pursuit of metaphysical arguments, would have excited an endless controversy; and the monarch discreetly proposed to his illiterate audience two substantial and visible arguments,—the testimony of Earth, and of Heaven. The Earth had submitted to the Nicene synod: the Romans, the Barbarians, and the inhabitants of Spain, unanimously professed the same orthodox creed; and the Visigoths resisted, almost alone, the consent of the Christian world. A superstitious age was prepared to reverence, as the testimony of Heaven, the preternatural cures, which were performed by the skill or virtue of the Catholic clergy; the baptismal fonts of Osset in Baetica, which were spontaneously replenished every year, on the vigil of Easter; and the miraculous shrine of St. Martin of Tours, which had already converted the Suevic prince and people of Gallicia. The Catholic king encountered some difficulties on this important change of the national religion. A conspiracy, secretly fomented by the queen-dowager, was formed against his life; and two counts excited a dangerous revolt in the Narbonnese Gaul. But Recared disarmed the conspirators, defeated the rebels, and executed severe justice; which the Arians, in their turn, might brand with the reproach of persecution. Eight bishops, whose names betray their Barbaric origin, abjured their errors; and all the books of Arian theology were reduced to ashes, with the house in which they had been purposely collected. The whole body of the Visigoths and Suevi were allured or driven into the pale of the Catholic communion; the faith, at least of the rising generation, was fervent and sincere: and the devout liberality of the Barbarians enriched the churches and monasteries of Spain. Seventy bishops, assembled in the council of Toledo, received the submission of their conquerors; and the zeal of the Spaniards improved the Nicene creed, by declaring the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son, as well as from the Father; a weighty point of doctrine, which produced, long afterwards, the schism of the Greek and Latin churches. The royal proselyte immediately saluted and consulted Pope Gregory, surnamed the Great, a learned and holy prelate, whose reign was distinguished by the conversion of heretics and infidels. The ambassadors of Recared respectfully offered on the threshold of the Vatican his rich presents of gold and gems; they accepted, as a lucrative exchange, the hairs of St. John the Baptist; a cross, which enclosed a small piece of the true wood; and a key, that contained some particles of iron which had been scraped from the chains of St. Peter.
His son and successor, Recared, the first Catholic king of Spain, had adopted the faith of his unfortunate brother, which he upheld with more wisdom and success. Instead of revolting against his father, Recared patiently waited for his father to pass away. Rather than condemning his memory, he believed that the dying king had renounced the errors of Arianism and encouraged his son to convert the Gothic nation. To achieve this important goal, Recared called a meeting of Arian clergy and nobles, declared himself a Catholic, and urged them to follow his example. The tedious interpretation of unclear texts or the intricate pursuit of metaphysical debates would have sparked endless arguments; so, the king wisely presented his uneducated audience with two concrete and visible proofs—the testimony of Earth and of Heaven. The Earth had accepted the Nicene Council: the Romans, the Barbarians, and the inhabitants of Spain all professed the same orthodox faith, while the Visigoths largely stood alone in opposing the consensus of the Christian world. A superstitious age was ready to respect, as the testimony of Heaven, the miraculous healings performed by the skill or holiness of the Catholic clergy; the baptismal fonts of Osset in Baetica, which were miraculously filled each year on the eve of Easter; and the miraculous shrine of St. Martin of Tours, which had already converted the Suevic prince and people of Galicia. The Catholic king faced some challenges in this significant shift of the national religion. A conspiracy, secretly stirred up by the queen dowager, was formed against his life; and two counts incited a dangerous rebellion in Narbonnese Gaul. But Recared disarmed the conspirators, defeated the rebels, and executed strict justice, which the Arians could condemn as persecution. Eight bishops, whose names reveal their Barbaric heritage, renounced their errors; and all the books of Arian theology were burned, along with the house where they had been deliberately gathered. The entire body of Visigoths and Suevi were attracted or forced into the Catholic faith; the beliefs of at least the younger generation were passionate and genuine, and the generous spirit of the Barbarians enriched the churches and monasteries of Spain. Seventy bishops, gathered in the council of Toledo, accepted the submission of their conquerors; and the enthusiasm of the Spaniards enhanced the Nicene creed by stating the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son, as well as from the Father—a significant theological point that later led to the schism between the Greek and Latin churches. The royal convert immediately sent greetings and consulted Pope Gregory, known as the Great, a learned and holy leader whose time was marked by the conversion of heretics and non-believers. The ambassadors of Recared courteously offered his valuable gifts of gold and precious stones at the gates of the Vatican; they received in exchange the hairs of St. John the Baptist, a cross containing a small piece of the true cross, and a key with fragments of iron scraped from the chains of St. Peter.
The same Gregory, the spiritual conqueror of Britain, encouraged the pious Theodelinda, queen of the Lombards, to propagate the Nicene faith among the victorious savages, whose recent Christianity was polluted by the Arian heresy. Her devout labors still left room for the industry and success of future missionaries; and many cities of Italy were still disputed by hostile bishops. But the cause of Arianism was gradually suppressed by the weight of truth, of interest, and of example; and the controversy, which Egypt had derived from the Platonic school, was terminated, after a war of three hundred years, by the final conversion of the Lombards of Italy.
The same Gregory, the spiritual conqueror of Britain, encouraged the devout Theodelinda, queen of the Lombards, to spread the Nicene faith among the victorious tribes, whose recent Christianity was tainted by the Arian heresy. Her dedicated efforts still allowed for the work and success of future missionaries, and many cities in Italy were still contested by opposing bishops. However, the cause of Arianism was gradually weakened by the strength of truth, self-interest, and example; the debate, which Egypt inherited from the Platonic school, ended, after a struggle lasting three hundred years, with the final conversion of the Lombards in Italy.
The first missionaries who preached the gospel to the Barbarians, appealed to the evidence of reason, and claimed the benefit of toleration. But no sooner had they established their spiritual dominion, than they exhorted the Christian kings to extirpate, without mercy, the remains of Roman or Barbaric superstition. The successors of Clovis inflicted one hundred lashes on the peasants who refused to destroy their idols; the crime of sacrificing to the demons was punished by the Anglo-Saxon laws with the heavier penalties of imprisonment and confiscation; and even the wise Alfred adopted, as an indispensable duty, the extreme rigor of the Mosaic institutions. But the punishment and the crime were gradually abolished among a Christian people; the theological disputes of the schools were suspended by propitious ignorance; and the intolerant spirit which could find neither idolaters nor heretics, was reduced to the persecution of the Jews. That exiled nation had founded some synagogues in the cities of Gaul; but Spain, since the time of Hadrian, was filled with their numerous colonies. The wealth which they accumulated by trade, and the management of the finances, invited the pious avarice of their masters; and they might be oppressed without danger, as they had lost the use, and even the remembrance, of arms. Sisebut, a Gothic king, who reigned in the beginning of the seventh century, proceeded at once to the last extremes of persecution. Ninety thousand Jews were compelled to receive the sacrament of baptism; the fortunes of the obstinate infidels were confiscated, their bodies were tortured; and it seems doubtful whether they were permitted to abandon their native country. The excessive zeal of the Catholic king was moderated, even by the clergy of Spain, who solemnly pronounced an inconsistent sentence: that the sacraments should not be forcibly imposed; but that the Jews who had been baptized should be constrained, for the honor of the church, to persevere in the external practice of a religion which they disbelieved and detested. Their frequent relapses provoked one of the successors of Sisebut to banish the whole nation from his dominions; and a council of Toledo published a decree, that every Gothic king should swear to maintain this salutary edict. But the tyrants were unwilling to dismiss the victims, whom they delighted to torture, or to deprive themselves of the industrious slaves, over whom they might exercise a lucrative oppression. The Jews still continued in Spain, under the weight of the civil and ecclesiastical laws, which in the same country have been faithfully transcribed in the Code of the Inquisition. The Gothic kings and bishops at length discovered, that injuries will produce hatred, and that hatred will find the opportunity of revenge. A nation, the secret or professed enemies of Christianity, still multiplied in servitude and distress; and the intrigues of the Jews promoted the rapid success of the Arabian conquerors.
The first missionaries who shared the gospel with the Barbarians appealed to reason and sought the benefits of tolerance. But as soon as they established their spiritual control, they urged the Christian kings to mercilessly eliminate any remnants of Roman or Barbarian superstition. The successors of Clovis punished peasants with one hundred lashes for refusing to destroy their idols; Anglo-Saxon laws imposed severe penalties like imprisonment and confiscation for sacrificing to demons; and even the wise Alfred deemed it essential to strictly enforce Mosaic laws. However, over time, both punishment and crime were phased out among a Christian population; the theological debates of academia were set aside due to convenient ignorance; and the intolerant attitude, which found no idolaters or heretics, turned to the persecution of Jews. This exiled community had established some synagogues in the cities of Gaul, but Spain had many of their numerous colonies since the time of Hadrian. The wealth they accumulated through trade and finance attracted the greedy attention of their rulers, and they were oppressed without risk, having lost both the means and memory of warfare. Sisebut, a Gothic king who ruled in the early seventh century, took extreme measures of persecution. Ninety thousand Jews were forced to undergo baptism; the fortunes of those who resisted had been confiscated, their bodies were tortured; and it was uncertain if they were allowed to leave their homeland. The excessive zeal of the Catholic king was even tempered by the Spanish clergy, who declared an inconsistent ruling: that the sacraments should not be imposed by force, but that baptized Jews should be required to outwardly practice a religion they did not believe in nor liked, for the honor of the church. Their frequent returns to Judaism angered one of Sisebut's successors, who ultimately banished the entire nation from his realm; a council of Toledo issued a decree mandating that every Gothic king swear to uphold this edict. However, the tyrants were reluctant to release the victims they enjoyed tormenting or to lose their diligent laborers, over whom they could maintain a profitable oppression. The Jews continued to exist in Spain under the burden of civil and ecclesiastical laws, which have been accurately included in the Code of the Inquisition. Eventually, the Gothic kings and bishops realized that injuries breed hatred, and hatred finds opportunities for revenge. A nation, whether secretly or openly hostile to Christianity, continued to grow in subjugation and misery; and the machinations of the Jews facilitated the swift success of the Arab conquerors.
As soon as the Barbarians withdrew their powerful support, the unpopular heresy of Arius sunk into contempt and oblivion. But the Greeks still retained their subtle and loquacious disposition: the establishment of an obscure doctrine suggested new questions, and new disputes; and it was always in the power of an ambitious prelate, or a fanatic monk, to violate the peace of the church, and, perhaps, of the empire. The historian of the empire may overlook those disputes which were confined to the obscurity of schools and synods. The Manichæans, who labored to reconcile the religions of Christ and of Zoroaster, had secretly introduced themselves into the provinces: but these foreign sectaries were involved in the common disgrace of the Gnostics, and the Imperial laws were executed by the public hatred. The rational opinions of the Pelagians were propagated from Britain to Rome, Africa, and Palestine, and silently expired in a superstitious age. But the East was distracted by the Nestorian and Eutychian controversies; which attempted to explain the mystery of the incarnation, and hastened the ruin of Christianity in her native land. These controversies were first agitated under the reign of the younger Theodosius: but their important consequences extend far beyond the limits of the present volume. The metaphysical chain of argument, the contests of ecclesiastical ambition, and their political influence on the decline of the Byzantine empire, may afford an interesting and instructive series of history, from the general councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon, to the conquest of the East by the successors of Mahomet.
As soon as the Barbarians withdrew their strong support, the unpopular heresy of Arius slipped into disregard and forgottenness. But the Greeks still kept their insightful and talkative nature: the emergence of an obscure doctrine raised new questions and disputes; and it was always in the hands of an ambitious bishop or a misguided monk to disrupt the peace of the church, and possibly, the empire. The historian of the empire may overlook those disputes that remained within the shadowy confines of schools and synods. The Manichaeans, who tried to merge the religions of Christ and Zoroaster, had secretly made their way into the provinces: but these foreign sects shared the common disgrace of the Gnostics, and the Imperial laws were enforced by public resentment. The rational views of the Pelagians spread from Britain to Rome, Africa, and Palestine, only to quietly fade away in a superstitious era. But the East was torn apart by the Nestorian and Eutychian debates, which sought to clarify the mystery of the incarnation and hastened the decline of Christianity in its homeland. These debates first erupted during the reign of the younger Theodosius: but their significant outcomes stretch far beyond the scope of this volume. The intricate arguments, struggles for ecclesiastical power, and their political ramifications on the fall of the Byzantine empire could provide a fascinating and educational historical narrative, from the general councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon to the conquest of the East by the followers of Muhammad.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part I.
Reign And Conversion Of Clovis.—His Victories Over The Alemanni, Burgundians, And Visigoths.—Establishment Of The French Monarchy In Gaul.—Laws Of The Barbarians.—State Of The Romans.—The Visigoths Of Spain.—Conquest Of Britain By The Saxons.
Reign and Conversion of Clovis.—His victories over the Alemanni, Burgundians, and Visigoths.—The establishment of the French monarchy in Gaul.—Laws of the Barbarians.—The state of the Romans.—The Visigoths of Spain.—The conquest of Britain by the Saxons.
The Gauls, who impatiently supported the Roman yoke, received a memorable lesson from one of the lieutenants of Vespasian, whose weighty sense has been refined and expressed by the genius of Tacitus. "The protection of the republic has delivered Gaul from internal discord and foreign invasions. By the loss of national independence, you have acquired the name and privileges of Roman citizens. You enjoy, in common with yourselves, the permanent benefits of civil government; and your remote situation is less exposed to the accidental mischiefs of tyranny. Instead of exercising the rights of conquest, we have been contented to impose such tributes as are requisite for your own preservation. Peace cannot be secured without armies; and armies must be supported at the expense of the people. It is for your sake, not for our own, that we guard the barrier of the Rhine against the ferocious Germans, who have so often attempted, and who will always desire, to exchange the solitude of their woods and morasses for the wealth and fertility of Gaul. The fall of Rome would be fatal to the provinces; and you would be buried in the ruins of that mighty fabric, which has been raised by the valor and wisdom of eight hundred years. Your imaginary freedom would be insulted and oppressed by a savage master; and the expulsion of the Romans would be succeeded by the eternal hostilities of the Barbarian conquerors." This salutary advice was accepted, and this strange prediction was accomplished. In the space of four hundred years, the hardy Gauls, who had encountered the arms of Cæsar, were imperceptibly melted into the general mass of citizens and subjects: the Western empire was dissolved; and the Germans, who had passed the Rhine, fiercely contended for the possession of Gaul, and excited the contempt, or abhorrence, of its peaceful and polished inhabitants. With that conscious pride which the preeminence of knowledge and luxury seldom fails to inspire, they derided the hairy and gigantic savages of the North; their rustic manners, dissonant joy, voracious appetite, and their horrid appearance, equally disgusting to the sight and to the smell. The liberal studies were still cultivated in the schools of Autun and Bordeaux; and the language of Cicero and Virgil was familiar to the Gallic youth. Their ears were astonished by the harsh and unknown sounds of the Germanic dialect, and they ingeniously lamented that the trembling muses fled from the harmony of a Burgundian lyre. The Gauls were endowed with all the advantages of art and nature; but as they wanted courage to defend them, they were justly condemned to obey, and even to flatter, the victorious Barbarians, by whose clemency they held their precarious fortunes and their lives.
The Gauls, who were impatiently living under Roman rule, received an unforgettable lesson from one of Vespasian's lieutenants, whose profound perspective has been articulated by the brilliance of Tacitus. "The protection of the republic has freed Gaul from internal strife and foreign attacks. By losing national independence, you've gained the title and rights of Roman citizens. You benefit, alongside each other, from the lasting advantages of civil governance; and your remote location is less vulnerable to the unpredictable dangers of tyranny. Instead of using the rights of conquest, we have only imposed the necessary tributes for your own survival. Peace can't be maintained without armies, and armies need to be financed by the people. We defend the Rhine against the fierce Germans, who have often tried and will always want to trade their isolated forests and swamps for the wealth and richness of Gaul, for your benefit, not ours. The fall of Rome would be catastrophic for the provinces; you would be buried in the ruins of that great structure, built by the courage and wisdom of eight hundred years. Your fancied freedom would suffer at the hands of a brutal master; and removing the Romans would only lead to endless conflicts with barbarian conquerors." This wise counsel was accepted, and this strange prediction came true. Over the course of four hundred years, the tough Gauls, who had once faced Caesar's armies, gradually blended into the larger crowd of citizens and subjects: the Western empire fell apart; and the Germans, who crossed the Rhine, fiercely battled for control of Gaul, causing scorn or disgust among its peaceful and cultured residents. With the pride that comes from knowledge and luxury, they mocked the hairy and massive savages from the North; their rough behaviors, loud celebrations, greedy appetites, and terrible appearances, all equally unpleasant to see and smell. The liberal arts were still pursued in the schools of Autun and Bordeaux; and the works of Cicero and Virgil were well-known to the Gallic youth. Their ears were shocked by the harsh and unfamiliar sounds of the German language, and they creatively mourned that the delicate muses had fled from the melody of a Burgundian lyre. The Gauls had all the benefits of art and nature; but since they lacked the courage to defend them, they were rightly condemned to serve and even flatter the victorious Barbarians, upon whose mercy they depended for their fragile fortunes and lives.
As soon as Odoacer had extinguished the Western empire, he sought the friendship of the most powerful of the Barbarians. The new sovereign of Italy resigned to Euric, king of the Visigoths, all the Roman conquests beyond the Alps, as far as the Rhine and the Ocean: and the senate might confirm this liberal gift with some ostentation of power, and without any real loss of revenue and dominion. The lawful pretensions of Euric were justified by ambition and success; and the Gothic nation might aspire, under his command, to the monarchy of Spain and Gaul. Arles and Marseilles surrendered to his arms: he oppressed the freedom of Auvergne; and the bishop condescended to purchase his recall from exile by a tribute of just, but reluctant praise. Sidonius waited before the gates of the palace among a crowd of ambassadors and suppliants; and their various business at the court of Bordeaux attested the power, and the renown, of the king of the Visigoths. The Heruli of the distant ocean, who painted their naked bodies with its crulean color, implored his protection; and the Saxons respected the maritime provinces of a prince, who was destitute of any naval force. The tall Burgundians submitted to his authority; nor did he restore the captive Franks, till he had imposed on that fierce nation the terms of an unequal peace. The Vandals of Africa cultivated his useful friendship; and the Ostrogoths of Pannonia were supported by his powerful aid against the oppression of the neighboring Huns. The North (such are the lofty strains of the poet) was agitated or appeased by the nod of Euric; the great king of Persia consulted the oracle of the West; and the aged god of the Tyber was protected by the swelling genius of the Garonne. The fortune of nations has often depended on accidents; and France may ascribe her greatness to the premature death of the Gothic king, at a time when his son Alaric was a helpless infant, and his adversary Clovis an ambitious and valiant youth.
As soon as Odoacer had brought down the Western Empire, he sought the friendship of the most powerful Barbarians. The new ruler of Italy gave Euric, king of the Visigoths, all the Roman territories beyond the Alps, stretching to the Rhine and the Ocean. The Senate could approve this generous gift with an air of power, without any real loss of income or control. Euric's rightful claims were backed by ambition and success, and under his leadership, the Gothic nation could aim for the rule over Spain and Gaul. Arles and Marseilles fell to his forces; he curtailed the freedom of Auvergne, and the bishop resorted to paying him for his return from exile with praise that was just, but hesitant. Sidonius waited outside the palace gates among a crowd of ambassadors and petitioners, and their various matters at the court of Bordeaux spoke to the power and reputation of the king of the Visigoths. The Heruli from the distant ocean, who painted their bare bodies in its vibrant colors, sought his protection; and the Saxons respected the coastal regions of a prince who had no naval power. The tall Burgundians accepted his authority; and he didn't release the captured Franks until he had imposed unfair peace terms on that fierce nation. The Vandals of Africa valued his helpful friendship; and the Ostrogoths of Pannonia were supported by his strong assistance against the oppression of the neighboring Huns. The North (as the poet grandly describes) was stirred or calmed by Euric's nod; the great king of Persia sought the oracle of the West; and the ancient god of the Tiber was safeguarded by the rising spirit of the Garonne. The fate of nations often hinges on random events, and France might owe its greatness to the untimely death of the Gothic king, when his son Alaric was just a helpless infant, and his rival Clovis was an ambitious and brave young man.
While Childeric, the father of Clovis, lived an exile in Germany, he was hospitably entertained by the queen, as well as by the king, of the Thuringians. After his restoration, Basina escaped from her husband's bed to the arms of her lover; freely declaring, that if she had known a man wiser, stronger, or more beautiful, than Childeric, that man should have been the object of her preference. Clovis was the offspring of this voluntary union; and, when he was no more than fifteen years of age, he succeeded, by his father's death, to the command of the Salian tribe. The narrow limits of his kingdom were confined to the island of the Batavians, with the ancient dioceses of Tournay and Arras; and at the baptism of Clovis the number of his warriors could not exceed five thousand. The kindred tribes of the Franks, who had seated themselves along the Belgic rivers, the Scheld, the Meuse, the Moselle, and the Rhine, were governed by their independent kings, of the Merovingian race; the equals, the allies, and sometimes the enemies of the Salic prince. But the Germans, who obeyed, in peace, the hereditary jurisdiction of their chiefs, were free to follow the standard of a popular and victorious general; and the superior merit of Clovis attracted the respect and allegiance of the national confederacy. When he first took the field, he had neither gold and silver in his coffers, nor wine and corn in his magazine; but he imitated the example of Cæsar, who, in the same country, had acquired wealth by the sword, and purchased soldiers with the fruits of conquest. After each successful battle or expedition, the spoils were accumulated in one common mass; every warrior received his proportionable share; and the royal prerogative submitted to the equal regulations of military law. The untamed spirit of the Barbarians was taught to acknowledge the advantages of regular discipline. At the annual review of the month of March, their arms were diligently inspected; and when they traversed a peaceful territory, they were prohibited from touching a blade of grass. The justice of Clovis was inexorable; and his careless or disobedient soldiers were punished with instant death. It would be superfluous to praise the valor of a Frank; but the valor of Clovis was directed by cool and consummate prudence. In all his transactions with mankind, he calculated the weight of interest, of passion, and of opinion; and his measures were sometimes adapted to the sanguinary manners of the Germans, and sometimes moderated by the milder genius of Rome, and Christianity. He was intercepted in the career of victory, since he died in the forty-fifth year of his age: but he had already accomplished, in a reign of thirty years, the establishment of the French monarchy in Gaul.
While Childeric, Clovis's father, was living in exile in Germany, the queen and king of the Thuringians generously hosted him. After he returned, Basina left her husband's bed for her lover, openly stating that if she had known a man who was wiser, stronger, or more handsome than Childeric, that man would have been her choice. Clovis was the result of this willing union, and when he was just fifteen, he took over leadership of the Salian tribe following his father's death. His kingdom was limited to the island of the Batavians, along with the older dioceses of Tournay and Arras; at Clovis's baptism, he had no more than five thousand warriors. The related tribes of the Franks settled along the Belgic rivers—the Scheld, the Meuse, the Moselle, and the Rhine—were ruled by their own independent kings from the Merovingian line, who were equal to, allied with, and sometimes enemies of the Salic prince. However, the Germans, who peacefully followed their chiefs' hereditary rules, were free to rally behind a popular and victorious general, and Clovis's exceptional skills earned him the respect and loyalty of this national coalition. At the outset of his campaign, he had no gold or silver, and no wine or grain in his stores; instead, he emulated Julius Caesar, who had amassed wealth through military conquest and used it to enlist soldiers. After each victorious battle or expedition, the spoils were pooled together, and every warrior received their fair share, with the king abiding by the military law's equal standards. The wild nature of the Barbarians was trained to appreciate the benefits of organized discipline. Each March, their weapons were thoroughly inspected, and when they passed through peaceful lands, they were forbidden from touching even a blade of grass. Clovis's sense of justice was unyielding; careless or disobedient soldiers faced immediate execution. While it may be unnecessary to extol the bravery of a Frank, Clovis's courage was guided by clear and seasoned prudence. In all his dealings with others, he weighed the impact of interest, emotion, and reputation, and his strategies sometimes aligned with the fierce customs of the Germans while at other times were tempered by the gentler influences of Rome and Christianity. He was cut short in his path to victory, dying at the age of forty-five, but by then he had already established the French monarchy in Gaul over a reign of thirty years.
The first exploit of Clovis was the defeat of Syagrius, the son of Ægidius; and the public quarrel might, on this occasion, be inflamed by private resentment. The glory of the father still insulted the Merovingian race; the power of the son might excite the jealous ambition of the king of the Franks. Syagrius inherited, as a patrimonial estate, the city and diocese of Soissons: the desolate remnant of the second Belgic, Rheims and Troyes, Beauvais and Amiens, would naturally submit to the count or patrician: and after the dissolution of the Western empire, he might reign with the title, or at least with the authority, of king of the Romans. As a Roman, he had been educated in the liberal studies of rhetoric and jurisprudence; but he was engaged by accident and policy in the familiar use of the Germanic idiom. The independent Barbarians resorted to the tribunal of a stranger, who possessed the singular talent of explaining, in their native tongue, the dictates of reason and equity. The diligence and affability of their judge rendered him popular, the impartial wisdom of his decrees obtained their voluntary obedience, and the reign of Syagrius over the Franks and Burgundians seemed to revive the original institution of civil society. In the midst of these peaceful occupations, Syagrius received, and boldly accepted, the hostile defiance of Clovis; who challenged his rival in the spirit, and almost in the language, of chivalry, to appoint the day and the field of battle. In the time of Cæsar Soissons would have poured forth a body of fifty thousand horse and such an army might have been plentifully supplied with shields, cuirasses, and military engines, from the three arsenals or manufactures of the city. But the courage and numbers of the Gallic youth were long since exhausted; and the loose bands of volunteers, or mercenaries, who marched under the standard of Syagrius, were incapable of contending with the national valor of the Franks. It would be ungenerous without some more accurate knowledge of his strength and resources, to condemn the rapid flight of Syagrius, who escaped, after the loss of a battle, to the distant court of Thoulouse. The feeble minority of Alaric could not assist or protect an unfortunate fugitive; the pusillanimous Goths were intimidated by the menaces of Clovis; and the Roman king, after a short confinement, was delivered into the hands of the executioner. The Belgic cities surrendered to the king of the Franks; and his dominions were enlarged towards the East by the ample diocese of Tongres which Clovis subdued in the tenth year of his reign.
Clovis's first major achievement was defeating Syagrius, the son of Ægidius; and this public conflict might have been intensified by personal grudges. The legacy of Syagrius's father still taunted the Merovingians, and the son's power could spark jealousy in the king of the Franks. Syagrius had inherited the city and diocese of Soissons as his family estate: the remnant cities of Rheims and Troyes, Beauvais and Amiens, would likely submit to him as their count or patrician; and after the fall of the Western empire, he could rule with the title, or at least the authority, of king of the Romans. Educated as a Roman in rhetoric and law, he also became familiar with the Germanic language due to circumstances and strategy. The independent Barbarians sought the judgment of this outsider, who had the unique ability to explain reason and fairness in their native tongue. His dedication and friendliness made him popular, and the fairness of his decisions earned their voluntary respect, making Syagrius's reign over the Franks and Burgundians seem to revive the foundations of civil society. Amid these peaceful pursuits, Syagrius received and bravely took on Clovis's challenge; Clovis called out his rival in the spirit, and almost the language, of chivalry to choose the day and place for battle. In Julius Caesar’s time, Soissons would have mustered fifty thousand cavalry, well-equipped with shields, armor, and war machines from the city's three armories. But the courage and numbers of the Gallic youth had long dwindled; the loose groups of volunteers or mercenaries under Syagrius's banner were not capable of matching the Franks' national bravery. It would be unfair to judge Syagrius's hasty retreat without knowing more about his strength and resources; he escaped after losing a battle to the far-off court of Thoulouse. The weak minority of Alaric couldn't help or protect him, the fearful Goths were scared off by Clovis's threats, and after a brief imprisonment, the Roman king was handed over to the executioner. The Belgic cities surrendered to the king of the Franks, and his territory expanded eastward with the sizable diocese of Tongres, which Clovis conquered in the tenth year of his reign.
The name of the Alemanni has been absurdly derived from their imaginary settlement on the banks of the Leman Lake. That fortunate district, from the lake to the Avenche, and Mount Jura, was occupied by the Burgundians. The northern parts of Helvetia had indeed been subdued by the ferocious Alemanni, who destroyed with their own hands the fruits of their conquest. A province, improved and adorned by the arts of Rome, was again reduced to a savage wilderness; and some vestige of the stately Vindonissa may still be discovered in the fertile and populous valley of the Aar. From the source of the Rhine to its conflux with the Mein and the Moselle, the formidable swarms of the Alemanni commanded either side of the river, by the right of ancient possession, or recent victory. They had spread themselves into Gaul, over the modern provinces of Alsace and Lorraine; and their bold invasion of the kingdom of Cologne summoned the Salic prince to the defence of his Ripuarian allies. Clovis encountered the invaders of Gaul in the plain of Tolbiac, about twenty-four miles from Cologne; and the two fiercest nations of Germany were mutually animated by the memory of past exploits, and the prospect of future greatness. The Franks, after an obstinate struggle, gave way; and the Alemanni, raising a shout of victory, impetuously pressed their retreat. But the battle was restored by the valor, and the conduct, and perhaps by the piety, of Clovis; and the event of the bloody day decided forever the alternative of empire or servitude. The last king of the Alemanni was slain in the field, and his people were slaughtered or pursued, till they threw down their arms, and yielded to the mercy of the conqueror. Without discipline it was impossible for them to rally: they had contemptuously demolished the walls and fortifications which might have protected their distress; and they were followed into the heart of their forests by an enemy not less active, or intrepid, than themselves. The great Theodoric congratulated the victory of Clovis, whose sister Albofleda the king of Italy had lately married; but he mildly interceded with his brother in favor of the suppliants and fugitives, who had implored his protection. The Gallic territories, which were possessed by the Alemanni, became the prize of their conqueror; and the haughty nation, invincible, or rebellious, to the arms of Rome, acknowledged the sovereignty of the Merovingian kings, who graciously permitted them to enjoy their peculiar manners and institutions, under the government of official, and, at length, of hereditary, dukes. After the conquest of the Western provinces, the Franks alone maintained their ancient habitations beyond the Rhine. They gradually subdued, and civilized, the exhausted countries, as far as the Elbe, and the mountains of Bohemia; and the peace of Europe was secured by the obedience of Germany.
The name Alemanni has been ridiculously linked to a fictional settlement by the shores of Leman Lake. That fortunate area, stretching from the lake to Avenche and Mount Jura, was inhabited by the Burgundians. The northern parts of Helvetia had indeed fallen under the fierce Alemanni, who destroyed the fruits of their conquest with their own hands. A province once enhanced and beautified by Roman culture was reverted back into a savage wilderness; some traces of the impressive Vindonissa can still be found in the fertile and populated valley of the Aar. From the source of the Rhine to its confluence with the Mein and Moselle, the powerful Alemanni controlled both sides of the river, either through ancient claims or recent victories. They had spread into Gaul, across the modern regions of Alsace and Lorraine; and their bold invasion of the kingdom of Cologne prompted the Salic prince to defend his Ripuarian allies. Clovis faced the invaders of Gaul in the plains of Tolbiac, about twenty-four miles from Cologne; both the fiercest nations of Germany were fueled by memories of past exploits and hopes for future greatness. The Franks eventually gave way after a stubborn struggle, and the Alemanni, with a shout of victory, aggressively pursued their retreat. However, the battle turned around thanks to Clovis's courage, leadership, and maybe his piety, and the outcome of that bloody day determined their fate of either empire or servitude. The last king of the Alemanni was killed in battle, and his people were either slaughtered or driven into surrender, throwing down their arms and pleading for the conqueror's mercy. Without any discipline, they couldn’t regroup: they had contemptuously torn down the walls and fortifications that could have protected them; and they were pursued into the depths of their forests by an enemy equally as active and fearless as they were. The great Theodoric congratulated Clovis on his victory, as Clovis's sister Albofleda had recently married the king of Italy; yet he gently intervened with his brother on behalf of the plea of the supplicants and fugitives who sought his protection. The Gallic lands that were held by the Alemanni became the spoils of their conqueror; and the proud nation, once invincible or defiant against Rome's armies, submitted to the rule of the Merovingian kings, who graciously allowed them to keep their unique customs and institutions under both official and eventually hereditary dukes. After the conquest of the Western provinces, only the Franks maintained their original settlements beyond the Rhine. They slowly conquered and civilized the worn-out lands as far as the Elbe and the mountains of Bohemia, securing peace in Europe through the obedience of Germany.
Till the thirtieth year of his age, Clovis continued to worship the gods of his ancestors. His disbelief, or rather disregard, of Christianity, might encourage him to pillage with less remorse the churches of a hostile territory: but his subjects of Gaul enjoyed the free exercise of religious worship; and the bishops entertained a more favorable hope of the idolater, than of the heretics. The Merovingian prince had contracted a fortunate alliance with the fair Clotilda, the niece of the king of Burgundy, who, in the midst of an Arian court, was educated in the profession of the Catholic faith. It was her interest, as well as her duty, to achieve the conversion of a Pagan husband; and Clovis insensibly listened to the voice of love and religion. He consented (perhaps such terms had been previously stipulated) to the baptism of his eldest son; and though the sudden death of the infant excited some superstitious fears, he was persuaded, a second time, to repeat the dangerous experiment. In the distress of the battle of Tolbiac, Clovis loudly invoked the God of Clotilda and the Christians; and victory disposed him to hear, with respectful gratitude, the eloquent Remigius, bishop of Rheims, who forcibly displayed the temporal and spiritual advantages of his conversion. The king declared himself satisfied of the truth of the Catholic faith; and the political reasons which might have suspended his public profession, were removed by the devout or loyal acclamations of the Franks, who showed themselves alike prepared to follow their heroic leader to the field of battle, or to the baptismal font. The important ceremony was performed in the cathedral of Rheims, with every circumstance of magnificence and solemnity that could impress an awful sense of religion on the minds of its rude proselytes. The new Constantine was immediately baptized, with three thousand of his warlike subjects; and their example was imitated by the remainder of the gentle Barbarians, who, in obedience to the victorious prelate, adored the cross which they had burnt, and burnt the idols which they had formerly adored. The mind of Clovis was susceptible of transient fervor: he was exasperated by the pathetic tale of the passion and death of Christ; and, instead of weighing the salutary consequences of that mysterious sacrifice, he exclaimed, with indiscreet fury, "Had I been present at the head of my valiant Franks, I would have revenged his injuries." But the savage conqueror of Gaul was incapable of examining the proofs of a religion, which depends on the laborious investigation of historic evidence and speculative theology. He was still more incapable of feeling the mild influence of the gospel, which persuades and purifies the heart of a genuine convert. His ambitious reign was a perpetual violation of moral and Christian duties: his hands were stained with blood in peace as well as in war; and, as soon as Clovis had dismissed a synod of the Gallican church, he calmly assassinated all the princes of the Merovingian race. Yet the king of the Franks might sincerely worship the Christian God, as a Being more excellent and powerful than his national deities; and the signal deliverance and victory of Tolbiac encouraged Clovis to confide in the future protection of the Lord of Hosts. Martin, the most popular of the saints, had filled the Western world with the fame of those miracles which were incessantly performed at his holy sepulchre of Tours. His visible or invisible aid promoted the cause of a liberal and orthodox prince; and the profane remark of Clovis himself, that St. Martin was an expensive friend, need not be interpreted as the symptom of any permanent or rational scepticism. But earth, as well as heaven, rejoiced in the conversion of the Franks. On the memorable day when Clovis ascended from the baptismal font, he alone, in the Christian world, deserved the name and prerogatives of a Catholic king. The emperor Anastasius entertained some dangerous errors concerning the nature of the divine incarnation; and the Barbarians of Italy, Africa, Spain, and Gaul, were involved in the Arian heresy. The eldest, or rather the only, son of the church, was acknowledged by the clergy as their lawful sovereign, or glorious deliverer; and the armies of Clovis were strenuously supported by the zeal and fervor of the Catholic faction.
Until he turned thirty, Clovis continued to worship the gods of his ancestors. His disbelief, or more accurately, his indifference toward Christianity, might have led him to plunder the churches in enemy territory without much guilt. However, his subjects in Gaul enjoyed the freedom to practice their religion; and the bishops held a more hopeful view of the idolater than of the heretics. The Merovingian prince formed a fortunate alliance with the beautiful Clotilda, the niece of the king of Burgundy, who was raised in a Catholic environment despite being in an Arian court. It was both her interest and her duty to convert her pagan husband, and Clovis gradually began to listen to the call of love and faith. He agreed (perhaps there had been prior negotiations) to the baptism of his eldest son; and although the sudden death of the infant sparked some superstitious fears, he was persuaded to try again. In the midst of the battle of Tolbiac, Clovis loudly called upon the God of Clotilda and the Christians; and victory led him to listen, with respectful gratitude, to Remigius, the bishop of Rheims, who passionately outlined the temporal and spiritual benefits of his conversion. The king declared himself convinced of the truth of the Catholic faith; and the political reasons that might have delayed his public profession were dispelled by the devoted cheers of the Franks, who were ready to follow their heroic leader into battle or to the baptismal font. The significant ceremony took place in the cathedral of Rheims, with all the grandeur and seriousness that could instill a profound sense of religion in the minds of its rough followers. The new Constantine was immediately baptized, along with three thousand of his warrior subjects; and their example was followed by the rest of the gentle Barbarians, who, in obedience to their victorious bishop, worshipped the cross they had once burned and destroyed the idols they used to adore. Clovis's mind was prone to brief outbursts of passion: he was stirred by the moving story of Christ's suffering and death; and instead of considering the beneficial outcomes of that mysterious sacrifice, he exclaimed in reckless anger, "Had I been there with my brave Franks, I would have avenged his wrongdoings." But the savage conqueror of Gaul was incapable of examining the evidence for a faith that relies on thorough historical analysis and contemplative theology. He was even less capable of embracing the gentle influence of the gospel, which appeals to and purifies the heart of a true convert. His ambitious reign was marked by continuous disregard for moral and Christian responsibilities: his hands were stained with blood in both peace and war; and as soon as Clovis had dismissed a synod of the Gallican church, he calmly assassinated all the princes of the Merovingian line. Nevertheless, the king of the Franks might sincerely revere the Christian God as a being more superior and powerful than his national deities; and the miraculous deliverance and victory at Tolbiac encouraged Clovis to trust in the future protection of the Lord of Hosts. Martin, the most popular of saints, had spread the fame of the miracles performed at his holy tomb in Tours throughout the Western world. His visible or invisible support advanced the cause of a generous and orthodox king; and Clovis's casual comment that St. Martin was an expensive friend should not be seen as evidence of any lasting or rational skepticism. Both earth and heaven celebrated the conversion of the Franks. On the memorable day Clovis emerged from the baptismal font, he alone among the Christian leaders earned the title and privileges of a Catholic king. Emperor Anastasius held some dangerous misconceptions about the divine incarnation; and the Barbarians in Italy, Africa, Spain, and Gaul were caught up in the Arian heresy. The eldest, or rather the only, son of the church was recognized by the clergy as their rightful sovereign and glorious liberator; and Clovis's armies were vigorously backed by the enthusiasm and fervor of the Catholic faction.
Under the Roman empire, the wealth and jurisdiction of the bishops, their sacred character, and perpetual office, their numerous dependants, popular eloquence, and provincial assemblies, had rendered them always respectable, and sometimes dangerous. Their influence was augmented with the progress of superstition; and the establishment of the French monarchy may, in some degree, be ascribed to the firm alliance of a hundred prelates, who reigned in the discontented, or independent, cities of Gaul. The slight foundations of the Armorican republic had been repeatedly shaken, or overthrown; but the same people still guarded their domestic freedom; asserted the dignity of the Roman name; and bravely resisted the predatory inroads, and regular attacks, of Clovis, who labored to extend his conquests from the Seine to the Loire. Their successful opposition introduced an equal and honorable union. The Franks esteemed the valor of the Armoricans and the Armoricans were reconciled by the religion of the Franks. The military force which had been stationed for the defence of Gaul, consisted of one hundred different bands of cavalry or infantry; and these troops, while they assumed the title and privileges of Roman soldiers, were renewed by an incessant supply of the Barbarian youth. The extreme fortifications, and scattered fragments of the empire, were still defended by their hopeless courage. But their retreat was intercepted, and their communication was impracticable: they were abandoned by the Greek princes of Constantinople, and they piously disclaimed all connection with the Arian usurpers of Gaul. They accepted, without shame or reluctance, the generous capitulation, which was proposed by a Catholic hero; and this spurious, or legitimate, progeny of the Roman legions, was distinguished in the succeeding age by their arms, their ensigns, and their peculiar dress and institutions. But the national strength was increased by these powerful and voluntary accessions; and the neighboring kingdoms dreaded the numbers, as well as the spirit, of the Franks. The reduction of the Northern provinces of Gaul, instead of being decided by the chance of a single battle, appears to have been slowly effected by the gradual operation of war and treaty and Clovis acquired each object of his ambition, by such efforts, or such concessions, as were adequate to its real value. His savage character, and the virtues of Henry IV., suggest the most opposite ideas of human nature; yet some resemblance may be found in the situation of two princes, who conquered France by their valor, their policy, and the merits of a seasonable conversion.
Under the Roman Empire, the wealth and power of the bishops, their sacred status, and ongoing positions, along with their many followers, persuasive speaking skills, and regional assemblies, made them consistently respected and sometimes a threat. Their influence grew with the rise of superstition, and the establishment of the French monarchy can be partly credited to the strong alliance of a hundred bishops who held sway in the discontented or independent cities of Gaul. The fragile foundations of the Armorican republic had been shaken and even destroyed numerous times, but the people continued to protect their local freedom, uphold the dignity of the Roman name, and resist the raiding attacks of Clovis, who sought to expand his conquests from the Seine to the Loire. Their successful resistance led to an equal and honorable union. The Franks respected the bravery of the Armoricans, and the Armoricans found common ground with the religion of the Franks. The military force meant to defend Gaul was made up of a hundred different groups of cavalry and infantry; these troops, while claiming the titles and privileges of Roman soldiers, were continuously replenished with young soldiers from outside. The far-off fortifications and scattered remnants of the empire were still defended by their desperate bravery. But their escape routes were blocked, and communication was nearly impossible: they were left behind by the Greek rulers of Constantinople, and they firmly rejected any ties with the Arian usurpers of Gaul. They accepted, without shame or hesitation, the generous terms offered by a Catholic leader; and this mixed, or legitimate, descendant of the Roman legions stood out in the following era by their weapons, banners, distinctive clothing, and customs. But the national strength grew with these influential and voluntary additions, and the neighboring kingdoms feared not only the numbers but also the spirit of the Franks. The takeover of the Northern provinces of Gaul did not hinge on the luck of a single battle; instead, it seemed to have been gradually achieved through a combination of warfare and treaties, with Clovis obtaining each of his ambitions through efforts or concessions that matched its real worth. His brutal nature and the virtues of Henry IV. present contrasting views of human nature; yet, some similarities can be found in the circumstances of two rulers who conquered France through their valor, clever strategies, and the benefits of a timely conversion.
The kingdom of the Burgundians, which was defined by the course of two Gallic rivers, the Saone and the Rhône, extended from the forest of Vosges to the Alps and the sea of Marseilles. The sceptre was in the hands of Gundobald. That valiant and ambitious prince had reduced the number of royal candidates by the death of two brothers, one of whom was the father of Clotilda; but his imperfect prudence still permitted Godegisel, the youngest of his brothers, to possess the dependent principality of Geneva. The Arian monarch was justly alarmed by the satisfaction, and the hopes, which seemed to animate his clergy and people after the conversion of Clovis; and Gundobald convened at Lyons an assembly of his bishops, to reconcile, if it were possible, their religious and political discontents. A vain conference was agitated between the two factions. The Arians upbraided the Catholics with the worship of three Gods: the Catholics defended their cause by theological distinctions; and the usual arguments, objections, and replies were reverberated with obstinate clamor; till the king revealed his secret apprehensions, by an abrupt but decisive question, which he addressed to the orthodox bishops. "If you truly profess the Christian religion, why do you not restrain the king of the Franks? He has declared war against me, and forms alliances with my enemies for my destruction. A sanguinary and covetous mind is not the symptom of a sincere conversion: let him show his faith by his works." The answer of Avitus, bishop of Vienna, who spoke in the name of his brethren, was delivered with the voice and countenance of an angel. "We are ignorant of the motives and intentions of the king of the Franks: but we are taught by Scripture, that the kingdoms which abandon the divine law are frequently subverted; and that enemies will arise on every side against those who have made God their enemy. Return, with thy people, to the law of God, and he will give peace and security to thy dominions." The king of Burgundy, who was not prepared to accept the condition which the Catholics considered as essential to the treaty, delayed and dismissed the ecclesiastical conference; after reproaching his bishops, that Clovis, their friend and proselyte, had privately tempted the allegiance of his brother.
The kingdom of the Burgundians, bordered by the two Gallic rivers, the Saône and the Rhône, stretched from the Vosges forest to the Alps and the sea of Marseille. Gundobald held the scepter. This brave and ambitious prince had reduced the number of royal contenders by eliminating two brothers, one of whom was Clotilda's father; however, his lack of foresight still allowed his youngest brother, Godegisel, to rule the principality of Geneva. The Arian king was rightly worried about the satisfaction and hopes that seemed to uplift his clergy and people after Clovis’s conversion. To address the political and religious discontent, Gundobald called an assembly of bishops in Lyons, hoping to find some common ground. The meeting turned into a futile debate between the two factions. The Arians criticized the Catholics for worshiping three Gods, while the Catholics defended themselves with theological arguments, leading to the usual back-and-forth of objections and rebuttals, all amidst persistent shouting. Finally, the king expressed his hidden worries with a sudden and pointed question directed at the orthodox bishops. "If you truly follow the Christian faith, why don’t you stop the king of the Franks? He has declared war on me and is forming alliances with my enemies to destroy me. A bloody and greedy heart doesn’t indicate real conversion: let him prove his faith through his actions." Avitus, the bishop of Vienna, who spoke for his fellow bishops, replied with the grace and demeanor of an angel. "We don’t know the motives or intentions of the king of the Franks; however, Scripture teaches us that kingdoms that turn away from divine law often fall, and enemies will rise up against those who make God their adversary. Return with your people to God’s law, and He will grant peace and security to your lands." The king of Burgundy, not ready to accept the conditions the Catholics deemed necessary for the treaty, postponed and ended the ecclesiastical conference, after accusing his bishops of allowing Clovis, their friend and convert, to secretly undermine his brother's allegiance.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part II.
The allegiance of his brother was already seduced; and the obedience of Godegisel, who joined the royal standard with the troops of Geneva, more effectually promoted the success of the conspiracy. While the Franks and Burgundians contended with equal valor, his seasonable desertion decided the event of the battle; and as Gundobald was faintly supported by the disaffected Gauls, he yielded to the arms of Clovis, and hastily retreated from the field, which appears to have been situate between Langres and Dijon. He distrusted the strength of Dijon, a quadrangular fortress, encompassed by two rivers, and by a wall thirty feet high, and fifteen thick, with four gates, and thirty-three towers: he abandoned to the pursuit of Clovis the important cities of Lyons and Vienna; and Gundobald still fled with precipitation, till he had reached Avignon, at the distance of two hundred and fifty miles from the field of battle. A long siege and an artful negotiation, admonished the king of the Franks of the danger and difficulty of his enterprise. He imposed a tribute on the Burgundian prince, compelled him to pardon and reward his brother's treachery, and proudly returned to his own dominions, with the spoils and captives of the southern provinces. This splendid triumph was soon clouded by the intelligence, that Gundobald had violated his recent obligations, and that the unfortunate Godegisel, who was left at Vienna with a garrison of five thousand Franks, had been besieged, surprised, and massacred by his inhuman brother. Such an outrage might have exasperated the patience of the most peaceful sovereign; yet the conqueror of Gaul dissembled the injury, released the tribute, and accepted the alliance, and military service, of the king of Burgundy. Clovis no longer possessed those advantages which had assured the success of the preceding war; and his rival, instructed by adversity, had found new resources in the affections of his people. The Gauls or Romans applauded the mild and impartial laws of Gundobald, which almost raised them to the same level with their conquerors. The bishops were reconciled, and flattered, by the hopes, which he artfully suggested, of his approaching conversion; and though he eluded their accomplishment to the last moment of his life, his moderation secured the peace, and suspended the ruin, of the kingdom of Burgundy.
The loyalty of his brother had already been swayed, and the support of Godegisel, who aligned with the royal forces from Geneva, significantly advanced the conspiracy's success. While the Franks and Burgundians fought bravely, Godegisel's timely defection determined the outcome of the battle; as Gundobald was weakly backed by the discontented Gauls, he gave in to Clovis’s forces and quickly retreated from the battlefield, which seems to have been located between Langres and Dijon. He distrusted the strength of Dijon, a four-sided fortress surrounded by two rivers, with walls thirty feet high and fifteen feet thick, equipped with four gates and thirty-three towers. He left the crucial cities of Lyons and Vienna open to Clovis’s pursuit; Gundobald continued to flee in haste until he reached Avignon, two hundred and fifty miles away from the battlefield. A long siege and clever negotiation made the king of the Franks aware of the danger and challenges of his mission. He imposed a tribute on the Burgundian prince, forced him to forgive and reward his brother’s betrayal, and returned to his own lands with the spoils and captives from the southern provinces. This grand victory was soon overshadowed by news that Gundobald had broken his recent promises and that the unfortunate Godegisel, left in Vienna with a garrison of five thousand Franks, had been besieged, caught off guard, and slaughtered by his ruthless brother. Such an outrage could have tested the patience of any peaceful ruler; yet the conqueror of Gaul masked his hurt, waived the tribute, and accepted an alliance and military service from the king of Burgundy. Clovis no longer had the advantages that had guaranteed his previous victory, while his opponent, having learned from defeat, found new support from the love of his people. The Gauls or Romans praised the fair and just laws of Gundobald, which nearly elevated them to the same status as their conquerors. The bishops were appeased and flattered by the hopes he cleverly hinted at regarding his upcoming conversion; although he postponed this to the very end of his life, his moderation maintained peace and delayed the downfall of the kingdom of Burgundy.
I am impatient to pursue the final ruin of that kingdom, which was accomplished under the reign of Sigismond, the son of Gundobald. The Catholic Sigismond has acquired the honors of a saint and martyr; but the hands of the royal saint were stained with the blood of his innocent son, whom he inhumanly sacrificed to the pride and resentment of a step-mother. He soon discovered his error, and bewailed the irreparable loss. While Sigismond embraced the corpse of the unfortunate youth, he received a severe admonition from one of his attendants: "It is not his situation, O king! it is thine which deserves pity and lamentation." The reproaches of a guilty conscience were alleviated, however, by his liberal donations to the monastery of Agaunum, or St. Maurice, in Vallais; which he himself had founded in honor of the imaginary martyrs of the Thebæan legion. A full chorus of perpetual psalmody was instituted by the pious king; he assiduously practised the austere devotion of the monks; and it was his humble prayer, that Heaven would inflict in this world the punishment of his sins. His prayer was heard: the avengers were at hand: and the provinces of Burgundy were overwhelmed by an army of victorious Franks. After the event of an unsuccessful battle, Sigismond, who wished to protract his life that he might prolong his penance, concealed himself in the desert in a religious habit, till he was discovered and betrayed by his subjects, who solicited the favor of their new masters. The captive monarch, with his wife and two children, was transported to Orleans, and buried alive in a deep well, by the stern command of the sons of Clovis; whose cruelty might derive some excuse from the maxims and examples of their barbarous age. Their ambition, which urged them to achieve the conquest of Burgundy, was inflamed, or disguised, by filial piety: and Clotilda, whose sanctity did not consist in the forgiveness of injuries, pressed them to revenge her father's death on the family of his assassin. The rebellious Burgundians (for they attempted to break their chains) were still permitted to enjoy their national laws under the obligation of tribute and military service; and the Merovingian princes peaceably reigned over a kingdom, whose glory and greatness had been first overthrown by the arms of Clovis.
I am eager to see the complete downfall of that kingdom, which happened during the reign of Sigismond, the son of Gundobald. The Catholic Sigismond is honored as a saint and martyr; however, the hands of this royal saint were tainted with the blood of his innocent son, whom he cruelly sacrificed out of pride and resentment toward a stepmother. He quickly recognized his mistake and mourned the irreversible loss. As Sigismond held the body of the unfortunate young man, one of his attendants reminded him harshly: "It is not his fate, O king! It is yours that deserves pity and mourning." Nonetheless, the guilt of his conscience was somewhat eased by his generous donations to the monastery of Agaunum, or St. Maurice, in Vallais, which he founded in honor of the imagined martyrs of the Theban legion. The pious king established a continuous choir of psalm singing; he diligently practiced the strict devotion of the monks; and he humbly prayed that Heaven would punish him for his sins in this life. His prayer was answered: retribution was imminent, and the provinces of Burgundy were swarmed by a victorious army of Franks. After an unsuccessful battle, Sigismond, wanting to extend his life to continue his penance, hid in the wilderness in a religious habit, until he was found and betrayed by his subjects, who sought the favor of their new rulers. The captured king, along with his wife and two children, was taken to Orleans and buried alive in a deep well by the harsh order of the sons of Clovis; whose cruelty might be somewhat justified by the beliefs and practices of their brutal era. Their ambition, driven by the desire to conquer Burgundy, was either inflamed or masked by a sense of filial duty: and Clotilda, whose holiness did not rest on forgiving wrongs, urged them to avenge her father’s death on her father’s assassin's family. The rebellious Burgundians (who tried to shake off their chains) were still allowed to maintain their national laws under the obligation of paying tribute and military service; and the Merovingian princes ruled peacefully over a kingdom, whose glory and grandeur had first been dismantled by the arms of Clovis.
The first victory of Clovis had insulted the honor of the Goths. They viewed his rapid progress with jealousy and terror; and the youthful fame of Alaric was oppressed by the more potent genius of his rival. Some disputes inevitably arose on the edge of their contiguous dominions; and after the delays of fruitless negotiation, a personal interview of the two kings was proposed and accepted. The conference of Clovis and Alaric was held in a small island of the Loire, near Amboise. They embraced, familiarly conversed, and feasted together; and separated with the warmest professions of peace and brotherly love. But their apparent confidence concealed a dark suspicion of hostile and treacherous designs; and their mutual complaints solicited, eluded, and disclaimed, a final arbitration. At Paris, which he already considered as his royal seat, Clovis declared to an assembly of the princes and warriors, the pretence, and the motive, of a Gothic war. "It grieves me to see that the Arians still possess the fairest portion of Gaul. Let us march against them with the aid of God; and, having vanquished the heretics, we will possess and divide their fertile provinces." The Franks, who were inspired by hereditary valor and recent zeal, applauded the generous design of their monarch; expressed their resolution to conquer or die, since death and conquest would be equally profitable; and solemnly protested that they would never shave their beards till victory should absolve them from that inconvenient vow. The enterprise was promoted by the public or private exhortations of Clotilda. She reminded her husband how effectually some pious foundation would propitiate the Deity, and his servants: and the Christian hero, darting his battle-axe with a skilful and nervous band, "There, (said he,) on that spot where my Francisca, shall fall, will I erect a church in honor of the holy apostles." This ostentatious piety confirmed and justified the attachment of the Catholics, with whom he secretly corresponded; and their devout wishes were gradually ripened into a formidable conspiracy. The people of Aquitain were alarmed by the indiscreet reproaches of their Gothic tyrants, who justly accused them of preferring the dominion of the Franks: and their zealous adherent Quintianus, bishop of Rodez, preached more forcibly in his exile than in his diocese. To resist these foreign and domestic enemies, who were fortified by the alliance of the Burgundians, Alaric collected his troops, far more numerous than the military powers of Clovis. The Visigoths resumed the exercise of arms, which they had neglected in a long and luxurious peace; a select band of valiant and robust slaves attended their masters to the field; and the cities of Gaul were compelled to furnish their doubtful and reluctant aid. Theodoric, king of the Ostrogoths, who reigned in Italy, had labored to maintain the tranquillity of Gaul; and he assumed, or affected, for that purpose, the impartial character of a mediator. But the sagacious monarch dreaded the rising empire of Clovis, and he was firmly engaged to support the national and religious cause of the Goths.
Clovis's first victory had insulted the Goths' honor. They watched his rapid rise with jealousy and fear, and Alaric's youthful fame was overshadowed by his more powerful rival. Disputes naturally arose along the borders of their territories, and after useless negotiations, both kings agreed to meet face-to-face. The meeting between Clovis and Alaric took place on a small island in the Loire, near Amboise. They greeted each other, chatted casually, and feasted together, parting with warm declarations of peace and brotherly love. However, their apparent trust masked deep suspicions of hostile and deceitful intentions, and their mutual grievances sought, avoided, and denied a final resolution. In Paris, which he already viewed as his royal seat, Clovis announced to a gathering of princes and warriors the reason and justification for a war against the Goths. "It pains me to see the Arians still holding the best parts of Gaul. Let’s march against them with God's help; and once we defeat the heretics, we will take and divide their rich lands." The Franks, driven by their ancestral bravery and newfound fervor, cheered their king's noble plan, expressing their determination to either conquer or die since both outcomes would be equally rewarding. They vowed not to shave their beards until victory freed them from that troublesome promise. Clotilda fueled the campaign with public and private encouragement. She reminded her husband how a pious foundation would endear him to God and His followers. The Christian hero, skillfully wielding his battle-axe, declared, "There, on that spot where my Francisca falls, I will build a church in honor of the holy apostles." This showy devotion solidified his bond with the Catholics, with whom he secretly communicated, and their devout hopes gradually morphed into a serious conspiracy. The people of Aquitaine were stirred by their Gothic oppressors' indiscreet criticisms, which rightly charged them with preferring Frankish rule. Their zealous supporter, Quintianus, bishop of Rodez, preached more effectively in exile than in his own diocese. To counter these foreign and domestic foes, bolstered by the alliance with the Burgundians, Alaric gathered his troops, which greatly outnumbered Clovis's military. The Visigoths resumed military practices they had abandoned during a long period of peace, accompanied by a select band of strong and brave slaves. The cities of Gaul were compelled to provide their uncertain and reluctant support. Theodoric, king of the Ostrogoths in Italy, had worked to keep peace in Gaul and pretended to act as an impartial mediator for that purpose. Yet the wise king feared Clovis's growing power and was firmly committed to backing the Goths' national and religious cause.
The accidental, or artificial, prodigies which adorned the expedition of Clovis, were accepted by a superstitious age, as the manifest declaration of the divine favor. He marched from Paris; and as he proceeded with decent reverence through the holy diocese of Tours, his anxiety tempted him to consult the shrine of St. Martin, the sanctuary and the oracle of Gaul. His messengers were instructed to remark the words of the Psalm which should happen to be chanted at the precise moment when they entered the church. Those words most fortunately expressed the valor and victory of the champions of Heaven, and the application was easily transferred to the new Joshua, the new Gideon, who went forth to battle against the enemies of the Lord. Orleans secured to the Franks a bridge on the Loire; but, at the distance of forty miles from Poitiers, their progress was intercepted by an extraordinary swell of the River Vigenna or Vienne; and the opposite banks were covered by the encampment of the Visigoths. Delay must be always dangerous to Barbarians, who consume the country through which they march; and had Clovis possessed leisure and materials, it might have been impracticable to construct a bridge, or to force a passage, in the face of a superior enemy. But the affectionate peasants who were impatient to welcome their deliverer, could easily betray some unknown or unguarded ford: the merit of the discovery was enhanced by the useful interposition of fraud or fiction; and a white hart, of singular size and beauty, appeared to guide and animate the march of the Catholic army. The counsels of the Visigoths were irresolute and distracted. A crowd of impatient warriors, presumptuous in their strength, and disdaining to fly before the robbers of Germany, excited Alaric to assert in arms the name and blood of the conquerors of Rome. The advice of the graver chieftains pressed him to elude the first ardor of the Franks; and to expect, in the southern provinces of Gaul, the veteran and victorious Ostrogoths, whom the king of Italy had already sent to his assistance. The decisive moments were wasted in idle deliberation; the Goths too hastily abandoned, perhaps, an advantageous post; and the opportunity of a secure retreat was lost by their slow and disorderly motions. After Clovis had passed the ford, as it is still named, of the Hart, he advanced with bold and hasty steps to prevent the escape of the enemy. His nocturnal march was directed by a flaming meteor, suspended in the air above the cathedral of Poitiers; and this signal, which might be previously concerted with the orthodox successor of St. Hilary, was compared to the column of fire that guided the Israelites in the desert. At the third hour of the day, about ten miles beyond Poitiers, Clovis overtook, and instantly attacked, the Gothic army; whose defeat was already prepared by terror and confusion. Yet they rallied in their extreme distress, and the martial youths, who had clamorously demanded the battle, refused to survive the ignominy of flight. The two kings encountered each other in single combat. Alaric fell by the hand of his rival; and the victorious Frank was saved by the goodness of his cuirass, and the vigor of his horse, from the spears of two desperate Goths, who furiously rode against him to revenge the death of their sovereign. The vague expression of a mountain of the slain, serves to indicate a cruel though indefinite slaughter; but Gregory has carefully observed, that his valiant countryman Apollinaris, the son of Sidonius, lost his life at the head of the nobles of Auvergne. Perhaps these suspected Catholics had been maliciously exposed to the blind assault of the enemy; and perhaps the influence of religion was superseded by personal attachment or military honor.
The accidental, or fake, wonders that embellished Clovis's expedition were accepted by a superstitious society as clear signs of divine favor. He marched from Paris, and as he reverently made his way through the holy diocese of Tours, his anxiety drove him to consult the shrine of St. Martin, the sanctuary and oracle of Gaul. He instructed his messengers to pay attention to the words of the Psalm that would be sung at the exact moment they entered the church. Fortunately, those words expressed the bravery and victory of Heaven’s champions, and the application was easily connected to the new Joshua, the new Gideon, who was going to battle against the enemies of the Lord. Orleans provided the Franks with a bridge over the Loire; however, 40 miles away from Poitiers, their progress was blocked by an unusual surge of the River Vigenna or Vienne, with the opposite banks occupied by the encampment of the Visigoths. Delay is always risky for Barbarians, who devastate the lands they march through; had Clovis had more time and resources, it might have been impossible to build a bridge or force a passage in front of a stronger enemy. But the grateful peasants, eager to welcome their savior, easily revealed some unknown or unguarded crossing: the value of the discovery was boosted by the clever use of deception or myth; and a magnificent white stag appeared to lead and motivate the march of the Christian army. The Visigoths were unsure and distracted. A group of impatient warriors, overly confident in their strength and unwilling to flee from the German invaders, pushed Alaric to assert the name and heritage of the conquerors of Rome in battle. More cautious leaders advised him to ride out the Franks’ initial fervor and await the veteran and victorious Ostrogoths from the southern provinces of Gaul, whom the king of Italy had already sent to help him. The crucial moments were wasted on pointless discussions; the Goths hastily abandoned, perhaps, a strategic position; and they lost their chance for a safe retreat due to their slow and disorganized movements. After Clovis crossed the ford, which is still named after the Stag, he advanced quickly to prevent the enemy's escape. His night march was guided by a bright meteor hanging in the air above the cathedral of Poitiers; this signal, which may have been coordinated in advance with the orthodox successor of St. Hilary, was likened to the pillar of fire that led the Israelites through the desert. At around 10 AM, about ten miles past Poitiers, Clovis caught up with and immediately attacked the Gothic army, which was already demoralized and confused. Yet they regrouped in their dire situation, and the eager young warriors, who had loudly called for battle, refused to endure the shame of retreat. The two kings faced off in single combat. Alaric was defeated by his rival; the victorious Frank was saved by the strength of his armor and the speed of his horse from the spears of two furious Goths, who charged at him to avenge their king's death. The vague mention of a mountain of the slain indicates a brutal, though imprecise, massacre; but Gregory carefully notes that his brave compatriot Apollinaris, the son of Sidonius, lost his life leading the nobles of Auvergne. Perhaps these suspected Catholics had been maliciously left exposed to the enemy's blind attack; and perhaps personal loyalty or military honor overshadowed the influence of religion.
Such is the empire of Fortune, (if we may still disguise our ignorance under that popular name,) that it is almost equally difficult to foresee the events of war, or to explain their various consequences. A bloody and complete victory has sometimes yielded no more than the possession of the field and the loss of ten thousand men has sometimes been sufficient to destroy, in a single day, the work of ages. The decisive battle of Poitiers was followed by the conquest of Aquitain. Alaric had left behind him an infant son, a bastard competitor, factious nobles, and a disloyal people; and the remaining forces of the Goths were oppressed by the general consternation, or opposed to each other in civil discord. The victorious king of the Franks proceeded without delay to the siege of Angoulême. At the sound of his trumpets the walls of the city imitated the example of Jericho, and instantly fell to the ground; a splendid miracle, which may be reduced to the supposition, that some clerical engineers had secretly undermined the foundations of the rampart. At Bordeaux, which had submitted without resistance, Clovis established his winter quarters; and his prudent economy transported from Thoulouse the royal treasures, which were deposited in the capital of the monarchy. The conqueror penetrated as far as the confines of Spain; restored the honors of the Catholic church; fixed in Aquitain a colony of Franks; and delegated to his lieutenants the easy task of subduing, or extirpating, the nation of the Visigoths. But the Visigoths were protected by the wise and powerful monarch of Italy. While the balance was still equal, Theodoric had perhaps delayed the march of the Ostrogoths; but their strenuous efforts successfully resisted the ambition of Clovis; and the army of the Franks, and their Burgundian allies, was compelled to raise the siege of Arles, with the loss, as it is said, of thirty thousand men. These vicissitudes inclined the fierce spirit of Clovis to acquiesce in an advantageous treaty of peace. The Visigoths were suffered to retain the possession of Septimania, a narrow tract of sea-coast, from the Rhône to the Pyrenees; but the ample province of Aquitain, from those mountains to the Loire, was indissolubly united to the kingdom of France.
Such is the realm of Fortune, (if we can still hide our ignorance behind that common term,) that it is nearly as hard to predict the outcomes of war as it is to explain their varied effects. A bloody and total victory has sometimes resulted in nothing more than taking the battlefield, while a loss of ten thousand men can sometimes completely undo years of progress in a single day. The decisive battle of Poitiers led to the conquest of Aquitaine. Alaric left behind an infant son, a illegitimate rival, rebellious nobles, and a disloyal population; the remaining Goth forces were either overwhelmed by general panic or engaged in civil strife. The victorious king of the Franks moved quickly to lay siege to Angoulême. At the sound of his trumpets, the city walls collapsed like those of Jericho, an impressive miracle that can easily be attributed to some clever engineers secretly undermining the ramparts. In Bordeaux, which surrendered without a fight, Clovis set up his winter quarters; his careful planning brought the royal treasures from Toulouse to be stored in the capital of the kingdom. The conqueror reached as far as the borders of Spain; he restored the honors of the Catholic Church; settled a colony of Franks in Aquitaine; and tasked his lieutenants with the straightforward job of either conquering or eliminating the Visigoth nation. However, the Visigoths had the protection of the wise and powerful king of Italy. As the situation remained balanced, Theodoric may have delayed the advance of the Ostrogoths; but their intense efforts effectively countered Clovis’s ambitions, forcing the Frankish army and their Burgundian allies to lift the siege of Arles, reportedly losing thirty thousand men in the process. These changes influenced Clovis’s fierce spirit to agree to a favorable peace treaty. The Visigoths were allowed to keep control of Septimania, a narrow stretch of coastline from the Rhône to the Pyrenees, but the vast province of Aquitaine, stretching from those mountains to the Loire, was permanently integrated into the kingdom of France.
After the success of the Gothic war, Clovis accepted the honors of the Roman consulship. The emperor Anastasius ambitiously bestowed on the most powerful rival of Theodoric the title and ensigns of that eminent dignity; yet, from some unknown cause, the name of Clovis has not been inscribed in the Fasti either of the East or West. On the solemn day, the monarch of Gaul, placing a diadem on his head, was invested, in the church of St. Martin, with a purple tunic and mantle. From thence he proceeded on horseback to the cathedral of Tours; and, as he passed through the streets, profusely scattered, with his own hand, a donative of gold and silver to the joyful multitude, who incessantly repeated their acclamations of Consul and Augustus. The actual or legal authority of Clovis could not receive any new accessions from the consular dignity. It was a name, a shadow, an empty pageant; and if the conqueror had been instructed to claim the ancient prerogatives of that high office, they must have expired with the period of its annual duration. But the Romans were disposed to revere, in the person of their master, that antique title which the emperors condescended to assume: the Barbarian himself seemed to contract a sacred obligation to respect the majesty of the republic; and the successors of Theodosius, by soliciting his friendship, tacitly forgave, and almost ratified, the usurpation of Gaul.
After the success of the Gothic war, Clovis accepted the honors of the Roman consulship. The emperor Anastasius eagerly gave the title and symbols of this esteemed position to the most powerful rival of Theodoric; however, for some unknown reason, Clovis's name has not been recorded in the Fasti of either the East or the West. On the significant day, the ruler of Gaul put a crown on his head and was dressed, in the church of St. Martin, in a purple tunic and mantle. He then rode on horseback to the cathedral of Tours and, as he went through the streets, generously distributed gold and silver to the happy crowd, who continually shouted their praises of Consul and Augustus. The actual or legal authority of Clovis couldn't gain anything new from the consular title. It was just a name, a mere shadow, a meaningless display; and if the conqueror had been told to claim the old privileges of that high office, they would have expired with the length of its annual term. But the Romans were inclined to honor, in their leader, that ancient title which the emperors chose to take on: the Barbarian himself seemed to take on a sacred duty to respect the dignity of the republic; and the successors of Theodosius, by seeking his friendship, subtly overlooked, and almost legitimized, the takeover of Gaul.
Twenty-five years after the death of Clovis this important concession was more formally declared, in a treaty between his sons and the emperor Justinian. The Ostrogoths of Italy, unable to defend their distant acquisitions, had resigned to the Franks the cities of Arles and Marseilles; of Arles, still adorned with the seat of a Prætorian præfect, and of Marseilles, enriched by the advantages of trade and navigation. This transaction was confirmed by the Imperial authority; and Justinian, generously yielding to the Franks the sovereignty of the countries beyond the Alps, which they already possessed, absolved the provincials from their allegiance; and established on a more lawful, though not more solid, foundation, the throne of the Merovingians. From that era they enjoyed the right of celebrating at Arles the games of the circus; and by a singular privilege, which was denied even to the Persian monarch, the gold coin, impressed with their name and image, obtained a legal currency in the empire. A Greek historian of that age has praised the private and public virtues of the Franks, with a partial enthusiasm, which cannot be sufficiently justified by their domestic annals. He celebrates their politeness and urbanity, their regular government, and orthodox religion; and boldly asserts, that these Barbarians could be distinguished only by their dress and language from the subjects of Rome. Perhaps the Franks already displayed the social disposition, and lively graces, which, in every age, have disguised their vices, and sometimes concealed their intrinsic merit. Perhaps Agathias, and the Greeks, were dazzled by the rapid progress of their arms, and the splendor of their empire. Since the conquest of Burgundy, Gaul, except the Gothic province of Septimania, was subject, in its whole extent, to the sons of Clovis. They had extinguished the German kingdom of Thuringia, and their vague dominion penetrated beyond the Rhine, into the heart of their native forests. The Alemanni, and Bavarians, who had occupied the Roman provinces of Rhætia and Noricum, to the south of the Danube, confessed themselves the humble vassals of the Franks; and the feeble barrier of the Alps was incapable of resisting their ambition. When the last survivor of the sons of Clovis united the inheritance and conquests of the Merovingians, his kingdom extended far beyond the limits of modern France. Yet modern France, such has been the progress of arts and policy, far surpasses, in wealth, populousness, and power, the spacious but savage realms of Clotaire or Dagobert.
Twenty-five years after Clovis's death, this important concession was more formally established through a treaty between his sons and Emperor Justinian. The Ostrogoths in Italy, unable to protect their distant lands, had surrendered the cities of Arles and Marseilles to the Franks; Arles, still home to the seat of a Praetorian prefect, and Marseilles, enriched by trade and navigation. This agreement was confirmed by Imperial authority; Justinian, generously granting the Franks control over the territories beyond the Alps that they already held, freed the locals from their allegiance and established a more legitimate, though not necessarily more stable, foundation for the throne of the Merovingians. From that time on, they had the right to celebrate the circus games in Arles; and through a unique privilege, denied even to the Persian king, the gold coin stamped with their name and image became legal currency in the empire. A Greek historian from that time praised the private and public virtues of the Franks with an enthusiasm that their domestic records don't fully support. He lauded their politeness and civility, their effective government, and orthodox religion, boldly claiming that these Barbarians could only be distinguished from the subjects of Rome by their clothing and language. Perhaps the Franks already exhibited a social charm and lively qualities that have historically masked their flaws and sometimes hidden their true merits. Maybe Agathias and the Greeks were simply impressed by their rapid military success and the splendor of their empire. Since the conquest of Burgundy, Gaul—except for the Gothic province of Septimania—was entirely under the control of Clovis's sons. They had obliterated the German kingdom of Thuringia, and their vague dominion extended beyond the Rhine, deep into their ancestral forests. The Alemanni and Bavarians, who had taken over the Roman provinces of Rhætia and Noricum to the south of the Danube, acknowledged themselves as humble vassals of the Franks, and the weak barrier of the Alps could not stop their ambitions. When the last surviving son of Clovis unified the inheritance and conquests of the Merovingians, his kingdom spread far beyond what we know as modern France. Yet, due to advancements in arts and governance, modern France, in wealth, population, and power, greatly exceeds the vast but brutal realms of Clotaire or Dagobert.
The Franks, or French, are the only people of Europe who can deduce a perpetual succession from the conquerors of the Western empire. But their conquest of Gaul was followed by ten centuries of anarchy and ignorance. On the revival of learning, the students, who had been formed in the schools of Athens and Rome, disdained their Barbarian ancestors; and a long period elapsed before patient labor could provide the requisite materials to satisfy, or rather to excite, the curiosity of more enlightened times. At length the eye of criticism and philosophy was directed to the antiquities of France; but even philosophers have been tainted by the contagion of prejudice and passion. The most extreme and exclusive systems, of the personal servitude of the Gauls, or of their voluntary and equal alliance with the Franks, have been rashly conceived, and obstinately defended; and the intemperate disputants have accused each other of conspiring against the prerogative of the crown, the dignity of the nobles, or the freedom of the people. Yet the sharp conflict has usefully exercised the adverse powers of learning and genius; and each antagonist, alternately vanquished and victorious has extirpated some ancient errors, and established some interesting truths. An impartial stranger, instructed by their discoveries, their disputes, and even their faults, may describe, from the same original materials, the state of the Roman provincials, after Gaul had submitted to the arms and laws of the Merovingian kings.
The Franks, or French, are the only people in Europe who can trace a continuous lineage from the conquerors of the Western Empire. However, their conquest of Gaul was followed by ten centuries of chaos and ignorance. When learning was revived, students trained in the schools of Athens and Rome looked down on their Barbarian ancestors; it took a long time for diligent work to produce the necessary materials to satisfy, or rather to spark, the curiosity of more enlightened eras. Eventually, the focus of criticism and philosophy turned to the history of France, but even philosophers were affected by their own biases and emotions. The most extreme and narrow-minded views, whether arguing for the personal servitude of the Gauls or their voluntary and equal alliance with the Franks, were hastily formed and stubbornly defended. Heated debates led each side to accuse the other of undermining the rights of the crown, the dignity of the nobility, or the freedom of the people. Nevertheless, this intense conflict has productively challenged the opposing forces of learning and creativity; each competitor, alternately defeated and victorious, has eliminated some longstanding errors and established some intriguing truths. An impartial outsider, informed by their discoveries, debates, and even their mistakes, can describe, using the same original sources, the condition of the Roman provincials after Gaul had come under the control of the Merovingian kings.
The rudest, or the most servile, condition of human society, is regulated, however, by some fixed and general rules. When Tacitus surveyed the primitive simplicity of the Germans, he discovered some permanent maxims, or customs, of public and private life, which were preserved by faithful tradition till the introduction of the art of writing, and of the Latin tongue. Before the election of the Merovingian kings, the most powerful tribe, or nation, of the Franks, appointed four venerable chieftains to compose the Salic laws; and their labors were examined and approved in three successive assemblies of the people. After the baptism of Clovis, he reformed several articles that appeared incompatible with Christianity: the Salic law was again amended by his sons; and at length, under the reign of Dagobert, the code was revised and promulgated in its actual form, one hundred years after the establishment of the French monarchy. Within the same period, the customs of the Ripuarians were transcribed and published; and Charlemagne himself, the legislator of his age and country, had accurately studied the two national laws, which still prevailed among the Franks. The same care was extended to their vassals; and the rude institutions of the Alemanni and Bavarians were diligently compiled and ratified by the supreme authority of the Merovingian kings. The Visigoths and Burgundians, whose conquests in Gaul preceded those of the Franks, showed less impatience to attain one of the principal benefits of civilized society. Euric was the first of the Gothic princes who expressed, in writing, the manners and customs of his people; and the composition of the Burgundian laws was a measure of policy rather than of justice; to alleviate the yoke, and regain the affections, of their Gallic subjects. Thus, by a singular coincidence, the Germans framed their artless institutions, at a time when the elaborate system of Roman jurisprudence was finally consummated. In the Salic laws, and the Pandects of Justinian, we may compare the first rudiments, and the full maturity, of civil wisdom; and whatever prejudices may be suggested in favor of Barbarism, our calmer reflections will ascribe to the Romans the superior advantages, not only of science and reason, but of humanity and justice. Yet the laws of the Barbarians were adapted to their wants and desires, their occupations and their capacity; and they all contributed to preserve the peace, and promote the improvement, of the society for whose use they were originally established. The Merovingians, instead of imposing a uniform rule of conduct on their various subjects, permitted each people, and each family, of their empire, freely to enjoy their domestic institutions; nor were the Romans excluded from the common benefits of this legal toleration. The children embraced the law of their parents, the wife that of her husband, the freedman that of his patron; and in all causes where the parties were of different nations, the plaintiff or accuser was obliged to follow the tribunal of the defendant, who may always plead a judicial presumption of right, or innocence. A more ample latitude was allowed, if every citizen, in the presence of the judge, might declare the law under which he desired to live, and the national society to which he chose to belong. Such an indulgence would abolish the partial distinctions of victory: and the Roman provincials might patiently acquiesce in the hardships of their condition; since it depended on themselves to assume the privilege, if they dared to assert the character, of free and warlike Barbarians.
The rudest or most servile condition of human society is, however, regulated by some fixed and general rules. When Tacitus looked at the simple lives of the Germans, he found some lasting maxims or customs related to public and private life, which were preserved through faithful tradition until writing and the Latin language were introduced. Before the Merovingian kings were elected, the most powerful tribe, or nation, of the Franks appointed four respected chieftains to draft the Salic laws, and their work was reviewed and approved in three successive assemblies of the people. After Clovis was baptized, he revised several articles that seemed incompatible with Christianity; the Salic law was further amended by his sons, and eventually, under King Dagobert, the code was updated and published in its current form, one hundred years after the French monarchy was established. Within the same time frame, the customs of the Ripuarians were transcribed and published, and Charlemagne himself, the legislator of his time and region, studied the two national laws that were still in place among the Franks. The same attention was given to their vassals, and the rudimentary systems of the Alemanni and Bavarians were carefully compiled and ratified by the authority of the Merovingian kings. The Visigoths and Burgundians, who conquered Gaul before the Franks, were less eager to achieve one of the main benefits of civilized society. Euric was the first of the Gothic princes to write down the manners and customs of his people; the creation of the Burgundian laws was a policy decision rather than a matter of justice, aimed at easing the burden and regaining the goodwill of their Gallic subjects. Thus, by a unique coincidence, the Germans developed their straightforward institutions at a time when the complex system of Roman law was fully established. In the Salic laws and the Pandects of Justinian, we can compare the early beginnings and the full maturity of civil wisdom; and whatever biases may favor Barbarism, our cooler thoughts will attribute to the Romans the greater advantages of not only knowledge and reason but also humanity and justice. Yet the laws of the Barbarians were suited to their needs and desires, their activities and their capabilities; and they all contributed to maintaining peace and promoting the betterment of the society for which they were originally created. The Merovingians, instead of enforcing a uniform code of conduct on their diverse subjects, allowed each people and each family of their empire to enjoy their own domestic institutions; the Romans were also not excluded from the shared benefits of this legal tolerance. Children adopted the law of their parents, wives accepted that of their husbands, and freedmen adhered to that of their patrons; in any cases involving parties from different nations, the plaintiff or accuser had to follow the jurisdiction of the defendant, who could always claim a legal presumption of right or innocence. More freedom was offered if every citizen could declare in front of the judge the law under which they wanted to live and the national community they wanted to belong to. Such leniency would eliminate the unfair distinctions of victory, and the Roman provincials might accept the difficulties of their situation with patience, since it was up to them to embrace the privilege if they dared to assert the identity of free and combative Barbarians.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part III.
When justice inexorably requires the death of a murderer, each private citizen is fortified by the assurance, that the laws, the magistrate, and the whole community, are the guardians of his personal safety. But in the loose society of the Germans, revenge was always honorable, and often meritorious: the independent warrior chastised, or vindicated, with his own hand, the injuries which he had offered or received; and he had only to dread the resentment of the sons and kinsmen of the enemy, whom he had sacrificed to his selfish or angry passions. The magistrate, conscious of his weakness, interposed, not to punish, but to reconcile; and he was satisfied if he could persuade or compel the contending parties to pay and to accept the moderate fine which had been ascertained as the price of blood. The fierce spirit of the Franks would have opposed a more rigorous sentence; the same fierceness despised these ineffectual restraints; and, when their simple manners had been corrupted by the wealth of Gaul, the public peace was continually violated by acts of hasty or deliberate guilt. In every just government the same penalty is inflicted, or at least is imposed, for the murder of a peasant or a prince. But the national inequality established by the Franks, in their criminal proceedings, was the last insult and abuse of conquest. In the calm moments of legislation, they solemnly pronounced, that the life of a Roman was of smaller value than that of a Barbarian. The Antrustion, a name expressive of the most illustrious birth or dignity among the Franks, was appreciated at the sum of six hundred pieces of gold; while the noble provincial, who was admitted to the king's table, might be legally murdered at the expense of three hundred pieces. Two hundred were deemed sufficient for a Frank of ordinary condition; but the meaner Romans were exposed to disgrace and danger by a trifling compensation of one hundred, or even fifty, pieces of gold. Had these laws been regulated by any principle of equity or reason, the public protection should have supplied, in just proportion, the want of personal strength. But the legislator had weighed in the scale, not of justice, but of policy, the loss of a soldier against that of a slave: the head of an insolent and rapacious Barbarian was guarded by a heavy fine; and the slightest aid was afforded to the most defenceless subjects. Time insensibly abated the pride of the conquerors and the patience of the vanquished; and the boldest citizen was taught, by experience, that he might suffer more injuries than he could inflict. As the manners of the Franks became less ferocious, their laws were rendered more severe; and the Merovingian kings attempted to imitate the impartial rigor of the Visigoths and Burgundians. Under the empire of Charlemagne, murder was universally punished with death; and the use of capital punishments has been liberally multiplied in the jurisprudence of modern Europe.
When justice inevitably calls for the death of a murderer, every citizen feels assured that the laws, the magistrate, and the entire community protect their personal safety. However, in the loose society of the Germans, revenge was always seen as honorable and even commendable: the independent warrior took matters into their own hands to avenge or rectify the wrongs they had suffered or inflicted; and they only had to fear the retaliation from the enemies’ family members they had harmed, driven by their own selfish or angry motives. The magistrate, aware of their limitations, stepped in not to punish but to mediate; they were content if they could persuade or force the involved parties to pay and accept the agreed-upon fine as compensation for a life lost. The fierce spirit of the Franks would have resisted harsher penalties; they looked down on these ineffective restrictions; and as their simple way of life was tainted by the wealth of Gaul, public order was regularly disrupted by swift or calculated wrongdoing. In any fair government, the same penalty is applied, or at least imposed, for the murder of a common person or a noble. However, the social inequality enforced by the Franks in their legal processes was the final insult and abuse of their conquest. During calmer legislative moments, they officially declared that the life of a Roman was worth less than that of a Barbarian. The Antrustion, a title denoting the highest birth or status among the Franks, was valued at six hundred gold pieces; meanwhile, a noble from the provinces, allowed to dine with the king, could be legally killed for just three hundred pieces. Two hundred pieces were seen as enough for an average Frank; but lesser Romans faced disgrace and peril for a meager compensation of one hundred, or even fifty, gold pieces. If these laws had been governed by any sense of fairness or logic, public protection would have adequately compensated for any shortfall in individual strength. But the lawmakers weighed the loss of a soldier against that of a slave not in terms of justice, but policy: the head of an arrogant and greedy Barbarian came with a hefty fine; while the most vulnerable subjects received minimal support. Over time, the pride of the conquerors and the patience of the conquered gradually diminished; and the boldest citizen learned, through experience, that they could endure more harm than they could inflict. As the Franks’ behavior became less brutal, their laws became harsher; and the Merovingian kings sought to mimic the strictness of the Visigoths and Burgundians. Under Charlemagne's rule, murder was universally punished by death; and the use of capital punishment has been greatly expanded in the legal systems of modern Europe.
The civil and military professions, which had been separated by Constantine, were again united by the Barbarians. The harsh sound of the Teutonic appellations was mollified into the Latin titles of Duke, of Count, or of Præfect; and the same officer assumed, within his district, the command of the troops, and the administration of justice. But the fierce and illiterate chieftain was seldom qualified to discharge the duties of a judge, which required all the faculties of a philosophic mind, laboriously cultivated by experience and study; and his rude ignorance was compelled to embrace some simple, and visible, methods of ascertaining the cause of justice. In every religion, the Deity has been invoked to confirm the truth, or to punish the falsehood of human testimony; but this powerful instrument was misapplied and abused by the simplicity of the German legislators. The party accused might justify his innocence, by producing before their tribunal a number of friendly witnesses, who solemnly declared their belief, or assurance, that he was not guilty. According to the weight of the charge, this legal number of compurgators was multiplied; seventy-two voices were required to absolve an incendiary or assassin: and when the chastity of a queen of France was suspected, three hundred gallant nobles swore, without hesitation, that the infant prince had been actually begotten by her deceased husband. The sin and scandal of manifest and frequent perjuries engaged the magistrates to remove these dangerous temptations; and to supply the defects of human testimony by the famous experiments of fire and water. These extraordinary trials were so capriciously contrived, that, in some cases, guilt, and innocence in others, could not be proved without the interposition of a miracle. Such miracles were really provided by fraud and credulity; the most intricate causes were determined by this easy and infallible method, and the turbulent Barbarians, who might have disdained the sentence of the magistrate, submissively acquiesced in the judgment of God.
The civil and military professions, which had been separated by Constantine, were once again brought together by the Barbarians. The harsh sounds of the Teutonic names were softened into the Latin titles of Duke, Count, or Prefect; and the same official took charge of the troops and handled the administration of justice in his area. However, the fierce and uneducated chieftain was rarely equipped to fulfill the role of a judge, which needed the abilities of a philosophical mind, honed through experience and study; his crude ignorance forced him to use some simple and obvious methods to determine the cause of justice. In every religion, people have called upon a deity to affirm the truth or punish lies within human testimony, but the German lawmakers misused this powerful tool due to their simplicity. The accused could prove their innocence by presenting a number of supportive witnesses before their court, who would solemnly declare their belief or certainty that the person was not guilty. Depending on the severity of the accusation, this required number of compurgators increased; seventy-two were needed to clear someone accused of arson or murder. And when the chastity of a queen of France was called into question, three hundred noblemen swore, without hesitation, that her infant son was genuinely fathered by her late husband. The sin and scandal of obvious and frequent perjury led magistrates to eliminate these dangerous temptations and replace the shortcomings of human testimony with the well-known tests of fire and water. These unusual trials were so unpredictably designed that, in some instances, neither guilt nor innocence could be proven without a miracle intervening. Such miracles were often the results of deceit and gullibility; the most complicated cases were settled through this easy and foolproof method, and the unruly Barbarians, who might have scoffed at the magistrate's ruling, meekly accepted the judgment of God.
But the trials by single combat gradually obtained superior credit and authority, among a warlike people, who could not believe that a brave man deserved to suffer, or that a coward deserved to live. Both in civil and criminal proceedings, the plaintiff, or accuser, the defendant, or even the witness, were exposed to mortal challenge from the antagonist who was destitute of legal proofs; and it was incumbent on them either to desert their cause, or publicly to maintain their honor, in the lists of battle. They fought either on foot, or on horseback, according to the custom of their nation; and the decision of the sword, or lance, was ratified by the sanction of Heaven, of the judge, and of the people. This sanguinary law was introduced into Gaul by the Burgundians; and their legislator Gundobald condescended to answer the complaints and objections of his subject Avitus. "Is it not true," said the king of Burgundy to the bishop, "that the event of national wars, and private combats, is directed by the judgment of God; and that his providence awards the victory to the juster cause?" By such prevailing arguments, the absurd and cruel practice of judicial duels, which had been peculiar to some tribes of Germany, was propagated and established in all the monarchies of Europe, from Sicily to the Baltic. At the end of ten centuries, the reign of legal violence was not totally extinguished; and the ineffectual censures of saints, of popes, and of synods, may seem to prove, that the influence of superstition is weakened by its unnatural alliance with reason and humanity. The tribunals were stained with the blood, perhaps, of innocent and respectable citizens; the law, which now favors the rich, then yielded to the strong; and the old, the feeble, and the infirm, were condemned, either to renounce their fairest claims and possessions, to sustain the dangers of an unequal conflict, or to trust the doubtful aid of a mercenary champion. This oppressive jurisprudence was imposed on the provincials of Gaul, who complained of any injuries in their persons and property. Whatever might be the strength, or courage, of individuals, the victorious Barbarians excelled in the love and exercise of arms; and the vanquished Roman was unjustly summoned to repeat, in his own person, the bloody contest which had been already decided against his country.
But trials by single combat gradually gained more respect and authority among a warrior culture that couldn't believe a brave person deserved to suffer or that a coward had a right to live. In both civil and criminal cases, the plaintiff or accuser, the defendant, or even witnesses faced death challenges from an opponent lacking legal evidence; it was up to them to either abandon their case or defend their honor in battle. They fought either on foot or on horseback, depending on their customs, and the outcome determined by sword or lance was endorsed by God, the judge, and the people. This bloody law was introduced in Gaul by the Burgundians, and their legislator Gundobald reluctantly addressed the complaints and objections of his subject Avitus. "Is it not true," the king of Burgundy said to the bishop, "that the outcomes of national wars and private battles are guided by God's judgment, and His providence grants victory to the more righteous cause?" With such persuasive arguments, the cruel and absurd practice of judicial duels, which was specific to some German tribes, spread and became established in all the monarchies of Europe, from Sicily to the Baltic. After ten centuries, the era of legal violence was not completely eliminated; the ineffective reprimands from saints, popes, and synods seem to indicate that the grip of superstition weakens when it clashes with reason and humanity. The courts were tainted with the blood of possibly innocent and respectable citizens; the law, which now favors the wealthy, once bowed to the strong; and the elderly, weak, and sick were forced to either give up their rightful claims and possessions to face the dangers of an unequal fight or to rely on the uncertain assistance of a hired champion. This oppressive legal system was imposed on the people of Gaul, who protested against injuries to their persons and property. Regardless of individual strength or courage, the victorious Barbarians excelled in love and skill in warfare, and the defeated Roman was unjustly called to engage again in the bloody battle that had already been lost for his nation.
A devouring host of one hundred and twenty thousand Germans had formerly passed the Rhine under the command of Ariovistus. One third part of the fertile lands of the Sequani was appropriated to their use; and the conqueror soon repeated his oppressive demand of another third, for the accommodation of a new colony of twenty-four thousand Barbarians, whom he had invited to share the rich harvest of Gaul. At the distance of five hundred years, the Visigoths and Burgundians, who revenged the defeat of Ariovistus, usurped the same unequal proportion of two thirds of the subject lands. But this distribution, instead of spreading over the province, may be reasonably confined to the peculiar districts where the victorious people had been planted by their own choice, or by the policy of their leader. In these districts, each Barbarian was connected by the ties of hospitality with some Roman provincial. To this unwelcome guest, the proprietor was compelled to abandon two thirds of his patrimony, but the German, a shepherd and a hunter, might sometimes content himself with a spacious range of wood and pasture, and resign the smallest, though most valuable, portion, to the toil of the industrious husbandman. The silence of ancient and authentic testimony has encouraged an opinion, that the rapine of the Franks was not moderated, or disguised, by the forms of a legal division; that they dispersed themselves over the provinces of Gaul, without order or control; and that each victorious robber, according to his wants, his avarice, and his strength, measured with his sword the extent of his new inheritance. At a distance from their sovereign, the Barbarians might indeed be tempted to exercise such arbitrary depredation; but the firm and artful policy of Clovis must curb a licentious spirit, which would aggravate the misery of the vanquished, whilst it corrupted the union and discipline of the conquerors. The memorable vase of Soissons is a monument and a pledge of the regular distribution of the Gallic spoils. It was the duty and the interest of Clovis to provide rewards for a successful army, settlements for a numerous people; without inflicting any wanton or superfluous injuries on the loyal Catholics of Gaul. The ample fund, which he might lawfully acquire, of the Imperial patrimony, vacant lands, and Gothic usurpations, would diminish the cruel necessity of seizure and confiscation, and the humble provincials would more patiently acquiesce in the equal and regular distribution of their loss.
A massive group of one hundred and twenty thousand Germans had crossed the Rhine under the leadership of Ariovistus. One-third of the fertile lands of the Sequani was taken for their use, and the conqueror soon demanded another third to accommodate a new colony of twenty-four thousand Barbarians, whom he had invited to share in the rich harvests of Gaul. Five hundred years later, the Visigoths and Burgundians, who avenged the defeat of Ariovistus, claimed the same disproportionate amount of two-thirds of the subject lands. However, this division, rather than spreading throughout the province, can be reasonably limited to the specific areas where the victorious people were settled by their own choice or by their leader's strategy. In these areas, each Barbarian was connected by hospitality ties to some Roman provincial. Because of this unwelcome guest, the landowner had to give up two-thirds of his inheritance, but the German, being a shepherd and hunter, could sometimes find satisfaction with a large area of woods and pasture, leaving the smallest, yet most valuable, part to the hardworking farmer. The lack of ancient and credible evidence has fostered the belief that the looting by the Franks was not moderated or masked by any legal division; they spread out across the provinces of Gaul without order or oversight, and each victorious robber measured the extent of his new inheritance with his sword according to his needs, greed, and strength. Away from their sovereign, the Barbarians might indeed be tempted to engage in such arbitrary plundering; however, the strong and clever policies of Clovis were needed to control a wild spirit that could worsen the suffering of the conquered while undermining the unity and discipline of the conquerors. The famous vase of Soissons serves as a reminder and assurance of the organized distribution of Gallic spoils. It was Clovis's duty and interest to provide rewards for a successful army and settlements for a large population, without causing unnecessary harm or excess injuries to the loyal Catholics of Gaul. The significant resources he could rightfully acquire—such as Imperial property, vacant lands, and Gothic occupations—would reduce the brutal need for seizing and confiscating land, making it easier for the humble provincials to accept the fair and systematic distribution of their losses.
The wealth of the Merovingian princes consisted in their extensive domain. After the conquest of Gaul, they still delighted in the rustic simplicity of their ancestors; the cities were abandoned to solitude and decay; and their coins, their charters, and their synods, are still inscribed with the names of the villas, or rural palaces, in which they successively resided. One hundred and sixty of these palaces, a title which need not excite any unseasonable ideas of art or luxury, were scattered through the provinces of their kingdom; and if some might claim the honors of a fortress, the far greater part could be esteemed only in the light of profitable farms. The mansion of the long-haired kings was surrounded with convenient yards and stables, for the cattle and the poultry; the garden was planted with useful vegetables; the various trades, the labors of agriculture, and even the arts of hunting and fishing, were exercised by servile hands for the emolument of the sovereign; his magazines were filled with corn and wine, either for sale or consumption; and the whole administration was conducted by the strictest maxims of private economy. This ample patrimony was appropriated to supply the hospitable plenty of Clovis and his successors; and to reward the fidelity of their brave companions who, both in peace and war, were devoted to their persona service. Instead of a horse, or a suit of armor, each companion, according to his rank, or merit, or favor, was invested with a benefice, the primitive name, and most simple form, of the feudal possessions. These gifts might be resumed at the pleasure of the sovereign; and his feeble prerogative derived some support from the influence of his liberality. But this dependent tenure was gradually abolished by the independent and rapacious nobles of France, who established the perpetual property, and hereditary succession, of their benefices; a revolution salutary to the earth, which had been injured, or neglected, by its precarious masters. Besides these royal and beneficiary estates, a large proportion had been assigned, in the division of Gaul, of allodial and Salic lands: they were exempt from tribute, and the Salic lands were equally shared among the male descendants of the Franks.
The wealth of the Merovingian princes lay in their vast territories. After they conquered Gaul, they still enjoyed the simple lifestyle of their ancestors; the cities were left to isolation and decline. Their coins, charters, and synods still bear the names of the villas, or rural palaces, where they lived over time. There were one hundred and sixty of these palaces, a term that shouldn't suggest any extravagant notions of art or luxury, spread across their kingdom's provinces. While some could be seen as fortresses, most were really just profitable farms. The residence of the long-haired kings was surrounded by practical yards and stables for livestock and poultry; the garden grew useful vegetables. Various trades, agricultural work, and even hunting and fishing were carried out by servants for the king's benefit; his granaries were stocked with grain and wine, either for sale or personal use, and everything was managed with strict principles of personal economy. This substantial estate was meant to support the generous hospitality of Clovis and his successors and to reward the loyalty of their brave companions who dedicated themselves to their service in both peace and war. Instead of a horse or a suit of armor, each companion was granted a benefice, the original name and simplest form of feudal holdings, based on their rank, merit, or favor. These gifts could be reclaimed at the king's will, and his weak authority was somewhat bolstered by the goodwill created through his generosity. However, this dependent system was gradually dismantled by the independent and greedy nobles of France, who established permanent ownership and hereditary rights to their benefices; a change that was beneficial for the land, which had suffered under its unstable rulers. In addition to these royal and benefactor estates, a significant portion of land had been allocated during the division of Gaul as allodial and Salic lands: these were tax-exempt, and the Salic lands were equally divided among the male descendants of the Franks.
In the bloody discord and silent decay of the Merovingian line, a new order of tyrants arose in the provinces, who, under the appellation of Seniors, or Lords, usurped a right to govern, and a license to oppress, the subjects of their peculiar territory. Their ambition might be checked by the hostile resistance of an equal: but the laws were extinguished; and the sacrilegious Barbarians, who dared to provoke the vengeance of a saint or bishop, would seldom respect the landmarks of a profane and defenceless neighbor. The common or public rights of nature, such as they had always been deemed by the Roman jurisprudence, were severely restrained by the German conquerors, whose amusement, or rather passion, was the exercise of hunting. The vague dominion which Man has assumed over the wild inhabitants of the earth, the air, and the waters, was confined to some fortunate individuals of the human species. Gaul was again overspread with woods; and the animals, who were reserved for the use or pleasure of the lord, might ravage with impunity the fields of his industrious vassals. The chase was the sacred privilege of the nobles and their domestic servants. Plebeian transgressors were legally chastised with stripes and imprisonment; but in an age which admitted a slight composition for the life of a citizen, it was a capital crime to destroy a stag or a wild bull within the precincts of the royal forests.
In the bloody conflict and quiet decline of the Merovingian dynasty, a new group of tyrants emerged in the provinces, known as Seniors or Lords, who claimed the right to rule and the freedom to oppress the people in their own territories. Their ambition could be restrained by the equal resistance of others, but the laws were gone; and the sacrilegious Barbarians, who dared to provoke the wrath of a saint or bishop, rarely respected the boundaries of a vulnerable and defenseless neighbor. The common or public rights of nature, as they had always been recognized by Roman law, were heavily restricted by the German conquerors, whose passion—rather than mere pastime—was hunting. The vague control that Man has taken over the wild animals of the earth, sky, and waters was limited to a few fortunate individuals among humanity. Gaul was once again covered in woods, and the animals, reserved for the enjoyment of their lords, could easily destroy the crops of their hardworking vassals without consequence. Hunting became a sacred right of the nobles and their servants. Commoners caught transgressing faced punishment with whipping and imprisonment; however, in an era where a small payment could spare a citizen's life, killing a stag or a wild bull within the royal forests was a capital offense.
According to the maxims of ancient war, the conqueror became the lawful master of the enemy whom he had subdued and spared: and the fruitful cause of personal slavery, which had been almost suppressed by the peaceful sovereignty of Rome, was again revived and multiplied by the perpetual hostilities of the independent Barbarians. The Goth, the Burgundian, or the Frank, who returned from a successful expedition, dragged after him a long train of sheep, of oxen, and of human captives, whom he treated with the same brutal contempt. The youths of an elegant form and an ingenuous aspect were set apart for the domestic service; a doubtful situation, which alternately exposed them to the favorable or cruel impulse of passion. The useful mechanics and servants (smiths, carpenters, tailors, shoemakers, cooks, gardeners, dyers, and workmen in gold and silver, &c.) employed their skill for the use, or profit, of their master. But the Roman captives, who were destitute of art, but capable of labor, were condemned, without regard to their former rank, to tend the cattle and cultivate the lands of the Barbarians. The number of the hereditary bondsmen, who were attached to the Gallic estates, was continually increased by new supplies; and the servile people, according to the situation and temper of their lords, was sometimes raised by precarious indulgence, and more frequently depressed by capricious despotism. An absolute power of life and death was exercised by these lords; and when they married their daughters, a train of useful servants, chained on the wagons to prevent their escape, was sent as a nuptial present into a distant country. The majesty of the Roman laws protected the liberty of each citizen, against the rash effects of his own distress or despair. But the subjects of the Merovingian kings might alienate their personal freedom; and this act of legal suicide, which was familiarly practised, is expressed in terms most disgraceful and afflicting to the dignity of human nature. The example of the poor, who purchased life by the sacrifice of all that can render life desirable, was gradually imitated by the feeble and the devout, who, in times of public disorder, pusillanimously crowded to shelter themselves under the battlements of a powerful chief, and around the shrine of a popular saint. Their submission was accepted by these temporal or spiritual patrons; and the hasty transaction irrecoverably fixed their own condition, and that of their latest posterity. From the reign of Clovis, during five successive centuries, the laws and manners of Gaul uniformly tended to promote the increase, and to confirm the duration, of personal servitude. Time and violence almost obliterated the intermediate ranks of society; and left an obscure and narrow interval between the noble and the slave. This arbitrary and recent division has been transformed by pride and prejudice into a national distinction, universally established by the arms and the laws of the Merovingians. The nobles, who claimed their genuine or fabulous descent from the independent and victorious Franks, have asserted and abused the indefeasible right of conquest over a prostrate crowd of slaves and plebeians, to whom they imputed the imaginary disgrace of Gallic or Roman extraction.
According to the ancient rules of war, the conqueror became the rightful master of the enemy he had defeated and spared. The cause of personal enslavement, which had nearly been eliminated by the peaceful rule of Rome, was revived and multiplied by the constant conflicts with independent Barbarians. The Goth, Burgundian, or Frank, returning from a successful raid, dragged along a long line of sheep, cattle, and human captives, whom he treated with brutal indifference. Young men with attractive physiques and innocent looks were chosen for domestic service, facing a precarious situation that made them vulnerable to the whims of their masters’ passions. The skilled laborers and servants (like blacksmiths, carpenters, tailors, shoemakers, cooks, gardeners, dyers, and goldsmiths) used their talents for the benefit of their masters. However, Roman captives, lacking special skills but able to work hard, were forced to care for the livestock and farm the land of the Barbarians, regardless of their previous status. The number of hereditary bondsmen tied to the Gallic estates kept growing due to continuous captures, and the condition of these enslaved people varied drastically depending on the mood of their lords—sometimes they were allowed leniency, but more often they were subjected to harsh tyranny. The lords held absolute power over life and death, and when they married off their daughters, a number of useful servants, chained to prevent their escape, were given as wedding gifts to strangers in distant lands. The authority of Roman laws protected each citizen’s freedom against rash actions born from distress or despair. In contrast, the subjects of the Merovingian kings could willingly give up their freedom, a form of legal suicide commonly practiced, expressed in terms that shamefully degraded human dignity. The plight of the poor, who traded their ability to live freely for mere survival, was slowly mirrored by the weak and devout, who, during chaotic times, desperately sought refuge with a powerful leader or a revered saint. These patrons accepted their submission, locking them into their lowered status and that of their descendants forever. From the reign of Clovis onward, for five centuries, the laws and customs of Gaul consistently encouraged the growth and entrenchment of personal servitude. Time and violence nearly erased the social classes in between, leaving a vague and narrow gap between the nobles and the slaves. This arbitrary and recent divide morphed through pride and bias into a national distinction, solidified by the military and the laws of the Merovingians. The nobles, who claimed lineage, whether real or embellished, from the independent and victorious Franks, exerted and abused their undeniable right of conquest over a subjugated mass of slaves and commoners, whom they accused of the imagined shame of being of Gallic or Roman descent.
The general state and revolutions of France, a name which was imposed by the conquerors, may be illustrated by the particular example of a province, a diocese, or a senatorial family. Auvergne had formerly maintained a just preeminence among the independent states and cities of Gaul. The brave and numerous inhabitants displayed a singular trophy; the sword of Cæsar himself, which he had lost when he was repulsed before the walls of Gergovia. As the common offspring of Troy, they claimed a fraternal alliance with the Romans; and if each province had imitated the courage and loyalty of Auvergne, the fall of the Western empire might have been prevented or delayed. They firmly maintained the fidelity which they had reluctantly sworn to the Visigoths, out when their bravest nobles had fallen in the battle of Poitiers, they accepted, without resistance, a victorious and Catholic sovereign. This easy and valuable conquest was achieved and possessed by Theodoric, the eldest son of Clovis: but the remote province was separated from his Austrasian dominions, by the intermediate kingdoms of Soissons, Paris, and Orleans, which formed, after their father's death, the inheritance of his three brothers. The king of Paris, Childebert, was tempted by the neighborhood and beauty of Auvergne. The Upper country, which rises towards the south into the mountains of the Cevennes, presented a rich and various prospect of woods and pastures; the sides of the hills were clothed with vines; and each eminence was crowned with a villa or castle. In the Lower Auvergne, the River Allier flows through the fair and spacious plain of Limagne; and the inexhaustible fertility of the soil supplied, and still supplies, without any interval of repose, the constant repetition of the same harvests. On the false report, that their lawful sovereign had been slain in Germany, the city and diocese of Auvergne were betrayed by the grandson of Sidonius Apollinaris. Childebert enjoyed this clandestine victory; and the free subjects of Theodoric threatened to desert his standard, if he indulged his private resentment, while the nation was engaged in the Burgundian war. But the Franks of Austrasia soon yielded to the persuasive eloquence of their king. "Follow me," said Theodoric, "into Auvergne; I will lead you into a province, where you may acquire gold, silver, slaves, cattle, and precious apparel, to the full extent of your wishes. I repeat my promise; I give you the people and their wealth as your prey; and you may transport them at pleasure into your own country." By the execution of this promise, Theodoric justly forfeited the allegiance of a people whom he devoted to destruction. His troops, reënforced by the fiercest Barbarians of Germany, spread desolation over the fruitful face of Auvergne; and two places only, a strong castle and a holy shrine, were saved or redeemed from their licentious fury. The castle of Meroliac was seated on a lofty rock, which rose a hundred feet above the surface of the plain; and a large reservoir of fresh water was enclosed, with some arable lands, within the circle of its fortifications. The Franks beheld with envy and despair this impregnable fortress; but they surprised a party of fifty stragglers; and, as they were oppressed by the number of their captives, they fixed, at a trifling ransom, the alternative of life or death for these wretched victims, whom the cruel Barbarians were prepared to massacre on the refusal of the garrison. Another detachment penetrated as far as Brivas, or Brioude, where the inhabitants, with their valuable effects, had taken refuge in the sanctuary of St. Julian. The doors of the church resisted the assault; but a daring soldier entered through a window of the choir, and opened a passage to his companions. The clergy and people, the sacred and the profane spoils, were rudely torn from the altar; and the sacrilegious division was made at a small distance from the town of Brioude. But this act of impiety was severely chastised by the devout son of Clovis. He punished with death the most atrocious offenders; left their secret accomplices to the vengeance of St. Julian; released the captives; restored the plunder; and extended the rights of sanctuary five miles round the sepulchre of the holy martyr.
The overall situation and revolutions of France, a name given by the conquerors, can be illustrated by looking at a specific example from a province, a diocese, or a senatorial family. Auvergne once held a notable position among the independent states and cities of Gaul. The brave and numerous inhabitants displayed a unique trophy: the sword of Caesar himself, which he lost when he was defeated outside the walls of Gergovia. Claiming a brotherly bond with the Romans as descendants of Troy, they believed that if each province had matched the courage and loyalty of Auvergne, the fall of the Western empire could have been prevented or postponed. They steadfastly honored the loyalty they had reluctantly pledged to the Visigoths, but after their bravest nobles fell in the battle of Poitiers, they accepted a victorious and Catholic ruler without resistance. This easy and valuable conquest was won and held by Theodoric, the eldest son of Clovis; however, this distant province was separated from his Austrasian territories by the intermediate kingdoms of Soissons, Paris, and Orleans, which became the inheritance of his three brothers after their father’s death. The king of Paris, Childebert, was drawn in by the proximity and beauty of Auvergne. The Upper country, rising towards the south into the Cevennes mountains, offered a rich variety of landscapes filled with woods and pastures; the hillsides were covered with vines, and every height was topped with a villa or castle. In the Lower Auvergne, the River Allier flows through the beautiful and expansive plain of Limagne; the never-ending fertility of the soil provided, and continues to provide, an uninterrupted yield of the same harvests. Based on the false rumor that their rightful ruler had been killed in Germany, the city and diocese of Auvergne were betrayed by the grandson of Sidonius Apollinaris. Childebert enjoyed this secretive victory, but Theodoric’s free subjects threatened to abandon him if he let his personal anger get in the way while the nation was involved in the Burgundian war. However, the Franks of Austrasia soon gave in to the persuasive speech of their king. "Follow me," said Theodoric, "to Auvergne; I will take you to a province where you can gain gold, silver, slaves, cattle, and fine clothing to your heart's content. I repeat my promise; I present you the people and their wealth as your bounty, and you may carry them back to your own land as you please." By fulfilling this promise, Theodoric justly lost the loyalty of a people he condemned to destruction. His troops, reinforced by the fiercest Barbarians from Germany, spread devastation across the fertile landscape of Auvergne; and only two places, a stronghold and a sacred shrine, were spared or retrieved from their reckless violence. The castle of Meroliac sat on a high rock that loomed a hundred feet above the plains; a large reservoir of fresh water and some arable land were enclosed within its fortifications. The Franks looked upon this impregnable fortress with jealousy and despair, but they managed to surprise a group of fifty stragglers; overwhelmed by the number of their captives, they set a small ransom as the choice between life or death for these unfortunate victims, whom the ruthless Barbarians were ready to slaughter if the garrison refused to comply. Another group pushed as far as Brivas, or Brioude, where the locals, with their valuables, sought refuge in the sanctuary of St. Julian. The church doors resisted the attack; yet a daring soldier entered through a window in the choir, creating an opening for his comrades. The clergy and townspeople, along with both sacred and secular spoils, were brutally ripped from the altar; this sacrilegious division took place not far from the town of Brioude. But this act of desecration was harshly punished by the devout son of Clovis. He executed the most heinous offenders, left their hidden accomplices to the wrath of St. Julian, freed the captives, returned the stolen goods, and expanded the rights of sanctuary five miles around the tomb of the holy martyr.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part IV.
Before the Austrasian army retreated from Auvergne, Theodoric exacted some pledges of the future loyalty of a people, whose just hatred could be restrained only by their fear. A select band of noble youths, the sons of the principal senators, was delivered to the conqueror, as the hostages of the faith of Childebert, and of their countrymen. On the first rumor of war, or conspiracy, these guiltless youths were reduced to a state of servitude; and one of them, Attalus, whose adventures are more particularly related, kept his master's horses in the diocese of Treves. After a painful search, he was discovered, in this unworthy occupation, by the emissaries of his grandfather, Gregory bishop of Langres; but his offers of ransom were sternly rejected by the avarice of the Barbarian, who required an exorbitant sum of ten pounds of gold for the freedom of his noble captive. His deliverance was effected by the hardy stratagem of Leo, a slave belonging to the kitchens of the bishop of Langres. An unknown agent easily introduced him into the same family. The Barbarian purchased Leo for the price of twelve pieces of gold; and was pleased to learn that he was deeply skilled in the luxury of an episcopal table: "Next Sunday," said the Frank, "I shall invite my neighbors and kinsmen. Exert thy art, and force them to confess, that they have never seen, or tasted, such an entertainment, even in the king's house." Leo assured him, that if he would provide a sufficient quantity of poultry, his wishes should be satisfied. The master who already aspired to the merit of elegant hospitality, assumed, as his own, the praise which the voracious guests unanimously bestowed on his cook; and the dexterous Leo insensibly acquired the trust and management of his household. After the patient expectation of a whole year, he cautiously whispered his design to Attalus, and exhorted him to prepare for flight in the ensuing night. At the hour of midnight, the intemperate guests retired from the table; and the Frank's son-in-law, whom Leo attended to his apartment with a nocturnal potation, condescended to jest on the facility with which he might betray his trust. The intrepid slave, after sustaining this dangerous raillery, entered his master's bedchamber; removed his spear and shield; silently drew the fleetest horses from the stable; unbarred the ponderous gates; and excited Attalus to save his life and liberty by incessant diligence. Their apprehensions urged them to leave their horses on the banks of the Meuse; they swam the river, wandered three days in the adjacent forest, and subsisted only by the accidental discovery of a wild plum-tree. As they lay concealed in a dark thicket, they heard the noise of horses; they were terrified by the angry countenance of their master, and they anxiously listened to his declaration, that, if he could seize the guilty fugitives, one of them he would cut in pieces with his sword, and would expose the other on a gibbet. At length, Attalus and his faithful Leo reached the friendly habitation of a presbyter of Rheims, who recruited their fainting strength with bread and wine, concealed them from the search of their enemy, and safely conducted them beyond the limits of the Austrasian kingdom, to the episcopal palace of Langres. Gregory embraced his grandson with tears of joy, gratefully delivered Leo, with his whole family, from the yoke of servitude, and bestowed on him the property of a farm, where he might end his days in happiness and freedom. Perhaps this singular adventure, which is marked with so many circumstances of truth and nature, was related by Attalus himself, to his cousin or nephew, the first historian of the Franks. Gregory of Tours was born about sixty years after the death of Sidonius Apollinaris; and their situation was almost similar, since each of them was a native of Auvergne, a senator, and a bishop. The difference of their style and sentiments may, therefore, express the decay of Gaul; and clearly ascertain how much, in so short a space, the human mind had lost of its energy and refinement.
Before the Austrasian army pulled back from Auvergne, Theodoric made the local people promise loyalty, which their justified anger could only be kept in check by their fear. A select group of noble young men, the sons of the leading senators, were handed over to the conqueror as hostages for Childebert's trust and their fellow citizens. The moment war or conspiracy was rumored, these innocent youths were reduced to servitude; one of them, Attalus, whose story is told in more detail, tended his master's horses in the diocese of Treves. After a difficult search, he was found in this degrading role by his grandfather's agents, Gregory, the bishop of Langres; however, the greedy Barbarian harshly turned down their ransom offers, demanding an outrageous ten pounds of gold for the freedom of his noble captive. Attalus was eventually rescued thanks to a clever plan by Leo, a slave who worked in the kitchens of the bishop of Langres. An unknown helper introduced him into the same household. The Barbarian bought Leo for twelve pieces of gold and was pleased to learn that he was skilled in preparing fine meals for a bishop: "Next Sunday," said the Frank, "I will invite my neighbors and relatives. Use your skills to impress them, so they say they have never had or seen such a feast, even at the king's house." Leo assured him that if he provided enough poultry, he would meet his expectations. The master, who already sought the reputation of being a gracious host, took credit for the praise that the hungry guests unanimously gave to his cook; over time, the clever Leo gained the trust and management of the household. After waiting an entire year, he quietly shared his escape plan with Attalus and encouraged him to get ready to flee that night. At midnight, the overindulgent guests left the table; the Frank's son-in-law, whom Leo accompanied to his room with a late-night drink, made jokes about how easily he could betray his trust. The fearless slave endured this risky teasing and then entered his master's bedroom, took away his spear and shield, quietly took the fastest horses from the stable, opened the heavy gates, and urged Attalus to escape and save their lives by being quick and diligent. Their fears drove them to leave their horses by the banks of the Meuse; they swam across the river, wandered for three days through the nearby forest, and survived only by accidentally finding a wild plum tree. While hiding in a dark thicket, they heard horses approaching; they were frightened by their master’s angry face and listened anxiously as he declared that if he caught the guilty runaways, he would cut one of them into pieces with his sword and hang the other. Finally, Attalus and his loyal Leo reached the safe home of a priest in Rheims, who brought them back to strength with bread and wine, hid them from their pursuer's search, and safely took them beyond the Austrasian kingdom to the episcopal palace in Langres. Gregory welcomed his grandson with tears of joy, gratefully freed Leo and his entire family from servitude, and granted him a farm where he could live out his days happily and free. This remarkable story, rich in truth and reality, may have been shared by Attalus himself with his cousin or nephew, who became the first historian of the Franks. Gregory of Tours was born about sixty years after Sidonius Apollinaris died; their circumstances were quite similar as both were from Auvergne, senators, and bishops. The difference in their writing styles and sentiments may reflect the decline of Gaul, clearly showing how much the human mind had lost in energy and refinement in such a short time.
We are now qualified to despise the opposite, and, perhaps, artful, misrepresentations, which have softened, or exaggerated, the oppression of the Romans of Gaul under the reign of the Merovingians. The conquerors never promulgated any universal edict of servitude, or confiscation; but a degenerate people, who excused their weakness by the specious names of politeness and peace, was exposed to the arms and laws of the ferocious Barbarians, who contemptuously insulted their possessions, their freedom, and their safety. Their personal injuries were partial and irregular; but the great body of the Romans survived the revolution, and still preserved the property, and privileges, of citizens. A large portion of their lands was exacted for the use of the Franks: but they enjoyed the remainder, exempt from tribute; and the same irresistible violence which swept away the arts and manufactures of Gaul, destroyed the elaborate and expensive system of Imperial despotism. The Provincials must frequently deplore the savage jurisprudence of the Salic or Ripuarian laws; but their private life, in the important concerns of marriage, testaments, or inheritance, was still regulated by the Theodosian Code; and a discontented Roman might freely aspire, or descend, to the title and character of a Barbarian. The honors of the state were accessible to his ambition: the education and temper of the Romans more peculiarly qualified them for the offices of civil government; and, as soon as emulation had rekindled their military ardor, they were permitted to march in the ranks, or even at the head, of the victorious Germans. I shall not attempt to enumerate the generals and magistrates, whose names attest the liberal policy of the Merovingians. The supreme command of Burgundy, with the title of Patrician, was successively intrusted to three Romans; and the last, and most powerful, Mummolus, who alternately saved and disturbed the monarchy, had supplanted his father in the station of count of Autun, and left a treasury of thirty talents of gold, and two hundred and fifty talents of silver. The fierce and illiterate Barbarians were excluded, during several generations, from the dignities, and even from the orders, of the church. The clergy of Gaul consisted almost entirely of native provincials; the haughty Franks fell at the feet of their subjects, who were dignified with the episcopal character: and the power and riches which had been lost in war, were insensibly recovered by superstition. In all temporal affairs, the Theodosian Code was the universal law of the clergy; but the Barbaric jurisprudence had liberally provided for their personal safety; a sub-deacon was equivalent to two Franks; the antrustion, and priest, were held in similar estimation: and the life of a bishop was appreciated far above the common standard, at the price of nine hundred pieces of gold. The Romans communicated to their conquerors the use of the Christian religion and Latin language; but their language and their religion had alike degenerated from the simple purity of the Augustan, and Apostolic age. The progress of superstition and Barbarism was rapid and universal: the worship of the saints concealed from vulgar eyes the God of the Christians; and the rustic dialect of peasants and soldiers was corrupted by a Teutonic idiom and pronunciation. Yet such intercourse of sacred and social communion eradicated the distinctions of birth and victory; and the nations of Gaul were gradually confounded under the name and government of the Franks.
We now have the right to look down on the opposing view and, maybe, clever misrepresentations that have either softened or exaggerated the oppression of the Romans in Gaul during the Merovingian reign. The conquerors never issued any universal decree of servitude or confiscation; instead, a weakened people, who justified their vulnerability with misleading notions of politeness and peace, were left exposed to the weapons and laws of the brutal Barbarians, who mocked their possessions, freedom, and safety. Their individual injuries were sporadic and inconsistent; however, the majority of the Romans survived the upheaval and still retained their property and citizen rights. A significant portion of their lands was taken for the use of the Franks, but they enjoyed the rest without having to pay taxes; and the same unstoppable force that wiped out the arts and industries of Gaul also dismantled the complex and costly system of Imperial tyranny. The locals often lamented the harsh legal system of the Salic or Ripuarian laws, but their personal matters, especially regarding marriage, wills, and inheritance, were still governed by the Theodosian Code. A dissatisfied Roman could aspire to or fall to the status of a Barbarian. State honors were available to his aspirations: the education and disposition of the Romans specifically prepared them for civil government positions; and as soon as competition revived their military spirit, they were allowed to march in the ranks, or even lead, alongside the victorious Germans. I won’t try to list the generals and officials whose names demonstrate the progressive policies of the Merovingians. The highest command of Burgundy, with the title of Patrician, was gradually entrusted to three Romans; the last and most powerful, Mummolus, who alternately saved and troubled the monarchy, replaced his father as Count of Autun and left behind a treasury of thirty talents of gold and two hundred and fifty talents of silver. The fierce and uneducated Barbarians were kept out of positions of honor, and even the church's orders, for several generations. The clergy in Gaul was almost entirely composed of native provincials; the proud Franks bowed before their subjects, who held the rank of bishop; and the power and wealth lost in battle were gradually regained through superstition. In all matters of governance, the Theodosian Code served as the universal law for the clergy, yet the Barbaric legal system generously ensured their personal safety; a sub-deacon was worth two Franks; the antrustion and priest were held in similar regard; and a bishop's life was valued highly, at the cost of nine hundred pieces of gold. The Romans taught their conquerors the Christian faith and Latin language, but both had declined from the simple purity of the Augustan and Apostolic ages. The spread of superstition and Barbarism was swift and widespread: the worship of saints hid the Christian God from common view, and the farmers' and soldiers' dialect was tainted by a Teutonic flavor and pronunciation. Still, this blending of sacred and social interaction erased the distinctions of birth and conquest; and the peoples of Gaul were gradually unified under the name and rule of the Franks.
The Franks, after they mingled with their Gallic subjects, might have imparted the most valuable of human gifts, a spirit and system of constitutional liberty. Under a king, hereditary, but limited, the chiefs and counsellors might have debated at Paris, in the palace of the Cæsars: the adjacent field, where the emperors reviewed their mercenary legions, would have admitted the legislative assembly of freemen and warriors; and the rude model, which had been sketched in the woods of Germany, might have been polished and improved by the civil wisdom of the Romans. But the careless Barbarians, secure of their personal independence, disdained the labor of government: the annual assemblies of the month of March were silently abolished; and the nation was separated, and almost dissolved, by the conquest of Gaul. The monarchy was left without any regular establishment of justice, of arms, or of revenue. The successors of Clovis wanted resolution to assume, or strength to exercise, the legislative and executive powers, which the people had abdicated: the royal prerogative was distinguished only by a more ample privilege of rapine and murder; and the love of freedom, so often invigorated and disgraced by private ambition, was reduced, among the licentious Franks, to the contempt of order, and the desire of impunity. Seventy-five years after the death of Clovis, his grandson, Gontran, king of Burgundy, sent an army to invade the Gothic possessions of Septimania, or Languedoc. The troops of Burgundy, Berry, Auvergne, and the adjacent territories, were excited by the hopes of spoil. They marched, without discipline, under the banners of German, or Gallic, counts: their attack was feeble and unsuccessful; but the friendly and hostile provinces were desolated with indiscriminate rage. The cornfields, the villages, the churches themselves, were consumed by fire: the inhabitants were massacred, or dragged into captivity; and, in the disorderly retreat, five thousand of these inhuman savages were destroyed by hunger or intestine discord. When the pious Gontran reproached the guilt or neglect of their leaders, and threatened to inflict, not a legal sentence, but instant and arbitrary execution, they accused the universal and incurable corruption of the people. "No one," they said, "any longer fears or respects his king, his duke, or his count. Each man loves to do evil, and freely indulges his criminal inclinations. The most gentle correction provokes an immediate tumult, and the rash magistrate, who presumes to censure or restrain his seditious subjects, seldom escapes alive from their revenge." It has been reserved for the same nation to expose, by their intemperate vices, the most odious abuse of freedom; and to supply its loss by the spirit of honor and humanity, which now alleviates and dignifies their obedience to an absolute sovereign.
The Franks, after mixing with their Gallic subjects, could have imparted the most valuable human gift: a spirit and system of constitutional liberty. Under a hereditary but limited king, the chiefs and advisors could have debated in Paris, in the palace of the Cæsars. The nearby field, where emperors reviewed their mercenary legions, could have hosted the legislative assembly of free men and warriors; the rough model sketched in the German woods might have been refined by the civil wisdom of the Romans. But the carefree Barbarians, confident in their personal independence, neglected the effort of governance: the annual assemblies in March were quietly abolished, and the nation was fragmented and nearly dissolved by the conquest of Gaul. The monarchy was left without a proper system of justice, military, or revenue. The successors of Clovis lacked the determination to assume, or the strength to wield, the legislative and executive powers that the people had given up; the royal prerogative was marked only by a broader license for plunder and murder, and the love of freedom, often both invigorated and tarnished by personal ambition, was reduced among the unruly Franks to a disdain for order and a craving for impunity. Seventy-five years after Clovis's death, his grandson Gontran, king of Burgundy, sent an army to invade the Gothic territories of Septimania, or Languedoc. The troops from Burgundy, Berry, Auvergne, and nearby regions were driven by hopes of loot. They marched without discipline, under the banners of German or Gallic counts; their attack was weak and unsuccessful, but both friendly and enemy provinces were ravaged in mindless fury. The fields, villages, and even churches were set ablaze; the inhabitants were slaughtered or taken captive, and during their chaotic retreat, five thousand of these brutal savages perished from hunger or internal strife. When the devout Gontran criticized the wrongdoing or negligence of their leaders and threatened to impose not a legal punishment but immediate and arbitrary execution, they blamed the pervasive and undeniable corruption of the people. "No one," they said, "fears or respects his king, duke, or count anymore. Everyone indulges in wrongdoing, embracing their criminal tendencies. The slightest correction leads to uproar, and any overzealous magistrate who dares to criticize or control his rebellious subjects rarely escapes their revenge alive." It has been left to the same nation to showcase, through their unchecked vices, the most egregious abuse of freedom; and to compensate for its loss with a spirit of honor and humanity that now tempers and dignifies their obedience to an absolute ruler.
The Visigoths had resigned to Clovis the greatest part of their Gallic possessions; but their loss was amply compensated by the easy conquest, and secure enjoyment, of the provinces of Spain. From the monarchy of the Goths, which soon involved the Suevic kingdom of Gallicia, the modern Spaniards still derive some national vanity; but the historian of the Roman empire is neither invited, nor compelled, to pursue the obscure and barren series of their annals. The Goths of Spain were separated from the rest of mankind by the lofty ridge of the Pyrenæan mountains: their manners and institutions, as far as they were common to the Germanic tribes, have been already explained. I have anticipated, in the preceding chapter, the most important of their ecclesiastical events, the fall of Arianism, and the persecution of the Jews; and it only remains to observe some interesting circumstances which relate to the civil and ecclesiastical constitution of the Spanish kingdom.
The Visigoths had given up most of their holdings in Gaul to Clovis, but they made up for that loss with an easy conquest and secure control over the provinces of Spain. The monarchy of the Goths, which soon included the Suevic kingdom of Galicia, still gives modern Spaniards a sense of national pride; however, the historian of the Roman Empire is neither invited nor obligated to delve into the obscure and unremarkable timeline of their history. The Goths in Spain were cut off from the rest of the world by the high Pyrenees mountains: their customs and institutions, as far as they were similar to other Germanic tribes, have already been discussed. In the previous chapter, I covered the most significant ecclesiastical events, such as the fall of Arianism and the persecution of the Jews; now, it remains to note some interesting details related to the civil and ecclesiastical structure of the Spanish kingdom.
After their conversion from idolatry or heresy, the Frank and the Visigoths were disposed to embrace, with equal submission, the inherent evils and the accidental benefits, of superstition. But the prelates of France, long before the extinction of the Merovingian race, had degenerated into fighting and hunting Barbarians. They disdained the use of synods; forgot the laws of temperance and chastity; and preferred the indulgence of private ambition and luxury to the general interest of the sacerdotal profession. The bishops of Spain respected themselves, and were respected by the public: their indissoluble union disguised their vices, and confirmed their authority; and the regular discipline of the church introduced peace, order, and stability, into the government of the state. From the reign of Recared, the first Catholic king, to that of Witiza, the immediate predecessor of the unfortunate Roderic, sixteen national councils were successively convened. The six metropolitans, Toledo, Seville, Merida, Braga, Tarragona, and Narbonne, presided according to their respective seniority; the assembly was composed of their suffragan bishops, who appeared in person, or by their proxies; and a place was assigned to the most holy, or opulent, of the Spanish abbots. During the first three days of the convocation, as long as they agitated the ecclesiastical question of doctrine and discipline, the profane laity was excluded from their debates; which were conducted, however, with decent solemnity. But, on the morning of the fourth day, the doors were thrown open for the entrance of the great officers of the palace, the dukes and counts of the provinces, the judges of the cities, and the Gothic nobles, and the decrees of Heaven were ratified by the consent of the people. The same rules were observed in the provincial assemblies, the annual synods, which were empowered to hear complaints, and to redress grievances; and a legal government was supported by the prevailing influence of the Spanish clergy. The bishops, who, in each revolution, were prepared to flatter the victorious, and to insult the prostrate labored, with diligence and success, to kindle the flames of persecution, and to exalt the mitre above the crown. Yet the national councils of Toledo, in which the free spirit of the Barbarians was tempered and guided by episcopal policy, have established some prudent laws for the common benefit of the king and people. The vacancy of the throne was supplied by the choice of the bishops and palatines; and after the failure of the line of Alaric, the regal dignity was still limited to the pure and noble blood of the Goths. The clergy, who anointed their lawful prince, always recommended, and sometimes practised, the duty of allegiance; and the spiritual censures were denounced on the heads of the impious subjects, who should resist his authority, conspire against his life, or violate, by an indecent union, the chastity even of his widow. But the monarch himself, when he ascended the throne, was bound by a reciprocal oath to God and his people, that he would faithfully execute this important trust. The real or imaginary faults of his administration were subject to the control of a powerful aristocracy; and the bishops and palatines were guarded by a fundamental privilege, that they should not be degraded, imprisoned, tortured, nor punished with death, exile, or confiscation, unless by the free and public judgment of their peers.
After converting from idolatry or heresy, the Franks and the Visigoths were quick to accept, with similar submission, both the inherent problems and the occasional benefits of superstition. However, the church leaders in France, long before the Merovingian dynasty ended, had sunk into becoming fighting and hunting barbarians themselves. They looked down on the use of councils, neglected the principles of self-control and chastity, and prioritized their own ambitions and luxury over the collective interests of the clergy. In contrast, the bishops of Spain had self-respect and were respected by the public; their strong unity masked their flaws and reinforced their authority. The structured discipline of the church brought peace, order, and stability to the state’s governance. From the reign of Recared, the first Catholic king, to that of Witiza, the immediate predecessor of the unfortunate Roderic, sixteen national councils were held one after another. The six metropolitans—Toledo, Seville, Merida, Braga, Tarragona, and Narbonne—presided according to their seniority; the assembly consisted of their suffragan bishops, who appeared in person or through proxies, and a place was designated for the most holy or wealthy Spanish abbots. For the first three days of the council, during discussions on church doctrine and discipline, the secular laity was excluded from the debates, which were carried out with proper seriousness. But on the fourth day, the doors were opened for the entrance of the high-ranking palace officials, dukes and counts from the provinces, city judges, and Gothic nobles, and the decrees of Heaven were confirmed by the people's agreement. The same procedures were followed in provincial assemblies and annual synods, which had the authority to hear complaints and rectify grievances, and a legal government was maintained through the influence of the Spanish clergy. The bishops, ready to flatter the victors in every upheaval and to insult the defeated, diligently and successfully worked to stir up persecution and elevate the ecclesiastical authority above the crown. Yet, the national councils of Toledo, where the free spirit of the Barbarians was guided by church policy, established some wise laws for the benefit of both the king and the people. The vacancy of the throne was filled by the choice of the bishops and high officials; after the fall of the line of Alaric, kingship was still restricted to those of pure and noble Gothic blood. The clergy, who anointed their rightful king, always upheld, and sometimes practiced, the principle of loyalty; spiritual censures were threatened against any impious subjects who resisted his authority, conspired against his life, or violated the chastity of his widow through inappropriate unions. However, when the king ascended to the throne, he took a reciprocal oath to God and the people to faithfully carry out this significant responsibility. The actual or perceived faults of his rule were subject to oversight by a powerful aristocracy, and the bishops and high officials enjoyed a fundamental privilege ensuring they could not be demoted, imprisoned, tortured, or punished with death, exile, or confiscation except through the fair and public judgment of their peers.
One of these legislative councils of Toledo examined and ratified the code of laws which had been compiled by a succession of Gothic kings, from the fierce Euric, to the devout Egica. As long as the Visigoths themselves were satisfied with the rude customs of their ancestors, they indulged their subjects of Aquitain and Spain in the enjoyment of the Roman law. Their gradual improvement in arts, in policy, and at length in religion, encouraged them to imitate, and to supersede, these foreign institutions; and to compose a code of civil and criminal jurisprudence, for the use of a great and united people. The same obligations, and the same privileges, were communicated to the nations of the Spanish monarchy; and the conquerors, insensibly renouncing the Teutonic idiom, submitted to the restraints of equity, and exalted the Romans to the participation of freedom. The merit of this impartial policy was enhanced by the situation of Spain under the reign of the Visigoths. The provincials were long separated from their Arian masters by the irreconcilable difference of religion. After the conversion of Recared had removed the prejudices of the Catholics, the coasts, both of the Ocean and Mediterranean, were still possessed by the Eastern emperors; who secretly excited a discontented people to reject the yoke of the Barbarians, and to assert the name and dignity of Roman citizens. The allegiance of doubtful subjects is indeed most effectually secured by their own persuasion, that they hazard more in a revolt, than they can hope to obtain by a revolution; but it has appeared so natural to oppress those whom we hate and fear, that the contrary system well deserves the praise of wisdom and moderation.
One of the legislative councils of Toledo looked at and approved the set of laws that had been created by a series of Gothic kings, from the fierce Euric to the devout Egica. As long as the Visigoths were happy with the rough customs of their ancestors, they allowed their subjects in Aquitaine and Spain to enjoy Roman law. Their gradual improvement in art, politics, and eventually religion encouraged them to adopt and replace these foreign systems and to create a code of civil and criminal law for a great and united people. The same responsibilities and privileges were extended to the nations of the Spanish monarchy, and the conquerors, gradually moving away from the Teutonic language, accepted the constraints of justice and elevated the Romans to share in freedom. The merit of this fair policy was heightened by the situation in Spain during the reign of the Visigoths. The provincial people were long kept apart from their Arian rulers due to their deep religious differences. After Recared’s conversion removed the biases of the Catholics, the coasts of both the Atlantic and Mediterranean were still held by the Eastern emperors, who secretly stirred up discontent amongst the people to break free from the Barbarians’ control and claim the name and dignity of Roman citizens. The loyalty of uncertain subjects is most effectively secured by their own belief that they risk more in a revolt than they can gain from a revolution; however, it seems so natural to oppress those we dislike and fear that adopting the opposite approach deserves recognition for its wisdom and moderation.
While the kingdom of the Franks and Visigoths were established in Gaul and Spain, the Saxons achieved the conquest of Britain, the third great diocese of the Præfecture of the West. Since Britain was already separated from the Roman empire, I might, without reproach, decline a story familiar to the most illiterate, and obscure to the most learned, of my readers. The Saxons, who excelled in the use of the oar, or the battle-axe, were ignorant of the art which could alone perpetuate the fame of their exploits; the Provincials, relapsing into barbarism, neglected to describe the ruin of their country; and the doubtful tradition was almost extinguished, before the missionaries of Rome restored the light of science and Christianity. The declamations of Gildas, the fragments, or fables, of Nennius, the obscure hints of the Saxon laws and chronicles, and the ecclesiastical tales of the venerable Bede, have been illustrated by the diligence, and sometimes embellished by the fancy, of succeeding writers, whose works I am not ambitious either to censure or to transcribe. Yet the historian of the empire may be tempted to pursue the revolutions of a Roman province, till it vanishes from his sight; and an Englishman may curiously trace the establishment of the Barbarians, from whom he derives his name, his laws, and perhaps his origin.
While the kingdoms of the Franks and Visigoths were set up in Gaul and Spain, the Saxons conquered Britain, the third major diocese of the Prefecture of the West. Since Britain was already cut off from the Roman Empire, I could, without any shame, skip over a story that is familiar to the least informed and obscure to the most educated among my readers. The Saxons, skilled with the oar and battle-axe, lacked the knowledge that could ensure their achievements were remembered; the locals, falling back into barbarism, neglected to document the downfall of their land, and the uncertain stories almost faded away before the missionaries from Rome brought back the light of knowledge and Christianity. The speeches of Gildas, the fragments or myths of Nennius, the vague references in the Saxon laws and chronicles, and the ecclesiastical stories of the venerable Bede have been clarified by the hard work, and sometimes the creativity, of later writers, whose works I have no desire to criticize or copy. Still, the historian of the empire might be tempted to follow the changes in a Roman province until it’s out of view; and an Englishman may take a keen interest in tracing the rise of the Barbarians, from whom he gets his name, laws, and perhaps even his roots.
About forty years after the dissolution of the Roman government, Vortigern appears to have obtained the supreme, though precarious command of the princes and cities of Britain. That unfortunate monarch has been almost unanimously condemned for the weak and mischievous policy of inviting a formidable stranger, to repel the vexatious inroads of a domestic foe. His ambassadors are despatched, by the gravest historians, to the coast of Germany: they address a pathetic oration to the general assembly of the Saxons, and those warlike Barbarians resolve to assist with a fleet and army the suppliants of a distant and unknown island. If Britain had indeed been unknown to the Saxons, the measure of its calamities would have been less complete. But the strength of the Roman government could not always guard the maritime province against the pirates of Germany; the independent and divided states were exposed to their attacks; and the Saxons might sometimes join the Scots and the Picts, in a tacit, or express, confederacy of rapine and destruction. Vortigern could only balance the various perils, which assaulted on every side his throne and his people; and his policy may deserve either praise or excuse, if he preferred the alliance of those Barbarians, whose naval power rendered them the most dangerous enemies and the most serviceable allies. Hengist and Horsa, as they ranged along the Eastern coast with three ships, were engaged, by the promise of an ample stipend, to embrace the defence of Britain; and their intrepid valor soon delivered the country from the Caledonian invaders. The Isle of Thanet, a secure and fertile district, was allotted for the residence of these German auxiliaries, and they were supplied, according to the treaty, with a plentiful allowance of clothing and provisions. This favorable reception encouraged five thousand warriors to embark with their families in seventeen vessels, and the infant power of Hengist was fortified by this strong and seasonable reenforcement. The crafty Barbarian suggested to Vortigern the obvious advantage of fixing, in the neighborhood of the Picts, a colony of faithful allies: a third fleet of forty ships, under the command of his son and nephew, sailed from Germany, ravaged the Orkneys, and disembarked a new army on the coast of Northumberland, or Lothian, at the opposite extremity of the devoted land. It was easy to foresee, but it was impossible to prevent, the impending evils. The two nations were soon divided and exasperated by mutual jealousies. The Saxons magnified all that they had done and suffered in the cause of an ungrateful people; while the Britons regretted the liberal rewards which could not satisfy the avarice of those haughty mercenaries. The causes of fear and hatred were inflamed into an irreconcilable quarrel. The Saxons flew to arms; and if they perpetrated a treacherous massacre during the security of a feast, they destroyed the reciprocal confidence which sustains the intercourse of peace and war.
About forty years after the fall of the Roman government, Vortigern seems to have gained the uneasy leadership of the princes and cities of Britain. That unfortunate king has been almost universally criticized for the misguided decision to invite a powerful outsider to defend against the annoying attacks of a domestic enemy. His envoys are sent, according to serious historians, to the coast of Germany, where they deliver a heartfelt speech to the general assembly of the Saxons, and those fierce warriors decide to help with a fleet and army for the plea of a distant and unknown island. If Britain had truly been unknown to the Saxons, the extent of its suffering would have been less severe. But the strength of the Roman government could not always protect the coastal region from pirates from Germany; the independent and fragmented states were vulnerable to their assaults; and the Saxons might sometimes join forces with the Scots and the Picts, in a silent or open alliance of looting and destruction. Vortigern could only weigh the various dangers that threatened his throne and people from all sides; and his policy might deserve either praise or forgiveness if he chose the alliance with those barbarians, whose naval power made them both the most formidable enemies and the most useful allies. Hengist and Horsa, as they traveled along the Eastern coast with three ships, were hired, with the promise of generous payment, to defend Britain; and their fearless bravery soon freed the country from the Caledonian invaders. The Isle of Thanet, a safe and fertile area, was designated for the settlement of these German allies, and they were provided, according to the agreement, with ample clothing and food. This warm welcome encouraged five thousand warriors to set sail with their families in seventeen ships, and the fledgling power of Hengist was bolstered by this significant and timely reinforcement. The cunning barbarian convinced Vortigern of the clear benefit of establishing a colony of loyal allies near the Picts: a third fleet of forty ships, led by his son and nephew, sailed from Germany, plundered the Orkneys, and landed a new army on the coast of Northumberland or Lothian, at the far end of the beleaguered land. It was easy to predict, but impossible to stop, the coming troubles. The two nations were quickly divided and inflamed by mutual suspicions. The Saxons exaggerated all they had done and endured for an ungrateful people, while the Britons lamented the generous rewards that could not satisfy the greed of those proud mercenaries. The sources of fear and hatred grew into an unresolvable conflict. The Saxons took up arms; and when they committed a treacherous massacre during the peace of a feast, they shattered the mutual trust that upholds the relationship between peace and war.
Hengist, who boldly aspired to the conquest of Britain, exhorted his countrymen to embrace the glorious opportunity: he painted in lively colors the fertility of the soil, the wealth of the cities, the pusillanimous temper of the natives, and the convenient situation of a spacious solitary island, accessible on all sides to the Saxon fleets. The successive colonies which issued, in the period of a century, from the mouths of the Elbe, the Weser, and the Rhine, were principally composed of three valiant tribes or nations of Germany; the Jutes, the old Saxons, and the Angles. The Jutes, who fought under the peculiar banner of Hengist, assumed the merit of leading their countrymen in the paths of glory, and of erecting, in Kent, the first independent kingdom. The fame of the enterprise was attributed to the primitive Saxons; and the common laws and language of the conquerors are described by the national appellation of a people, which, at the end of four hundred years, produced the first monarchs of South Britain. The Angles were distinguished by their numbers and their success; and they claimed the honor of fixing a perpetual name on the country, of which they occupied the most ample portion. The Barbarians, who followed the hopes of rapine either on the land or sea, were insensibly blended with this triple confederacy; the Frisians, who had been tempted by their vicinity to the British shores, might balance, during a short space, the strength and reputation of the native Saxons; the Danes, the Prussians, the Rugians, are faintly described; and some adventurous Huns, who had wandered as far as the Baltic, might embark on board the German vessels, for the conquest of a new world. But this arduous achievement was not prepared or executed by the union of national powers. Each intrepid chieftain, according to the measure of his fame and fortunes, assembled his followers; equipped a fleet of three, or perhaps of sixty, vessels; chose the place of the attack; and conducted his subsequent operations according to the events of the war, and the dictates of his private interest. In the invasion of Britain many heroes vanquished and fell; but only seven victorious leaders assumed, or at least maintained, the title of kings. Seven independent thrones, the Saxon Heptarchy, were founded by the conquerors, and seven families, one of which has been continued, by female succession, to our present sovereign, derived their equal and sacred lineage from Woden, the god of war. It has been pretended, that this republic of kings was moderated by a general council and a supreme magistrate. But such an artificial scheme of policy is repugnant to the rude and turbulent spirit of the Saxons: their laws are silent; and their imperfect annals afford only a dark and bloody prospect of intestine discord.
Hengist, who boldly aimed to conquer Britain, urged his fellow countrymen to seize the glorious opportunity: he vividly described the richness of the land, the wealth of the cities, the cowardly nature of the locals, and the strategic position of a large, isolated island that was accessible from all sides to Saxon ships. The successive colonies that emerged over a century from the mouths of the Elbe, Weser, and Rhine mainly consisted of three brave tribes from Germany: the Jutes, the old Saxons, and the Angles. The Jutes, who fought under Hengist’s unique banner, took the credit for guiding their countrymen toward glory and establishing the first independent kingdom in Kent. The fame of their venture was attributed to the early Saxons, and the shared laws and language of the conquerors are collectively referred to by the name of a group that, after four hundred years, produced the first kings of Southern Britain. The Angles were noted for their numbers and their achievements; they claimed the honor of giving the country its lasting name by occupying the largest area. The Barbarians drawn by the allure of looting, whether on land or sea, gradually merged into this triple alliance; the Frisians, tempted by their proximity to the British coasts, briefly matched the strength and reputation of the native Saxons; the Danes, Prussians, and Rugians are only vaguely mentioned; and some adventurous Huns who had traveled as far as the Baltic might have boarded German ships to conquer a new world. But this challenging endeavor was not planned or carried out through a coalition of national forces. Each brave leader, depending on his fame and resources, gathered his followers, equipped a fleet of three to sixty ships, chose the site of the attack, and carried out his subsequent strategies based on the progress of the war and his personal interests. During the invasion of Britain, many heroes triumphed and fell, but only seven victorious leaders claimed, or at least kept, the title of kings. Seven independent thrones, known as the Saxon Heptarchy, were established by the conquerors, and seven families, one of which has continued, through female succession, to our current monarch, trace their equal and sacred lineage back to Woden, the god of war. It has been suggested that this republic of kings was regulated by a general council and a supreme leader. However, such a fabricated political structure contradicts the rough and turbulent spirit of the Saxons: their laws are unrecorded, and their incomplete histories provide only a dark and violent picture of internal strife.
A monk, who, in the profound ignorance of human life, has presumed to exercise the office of historian, strangely disfigures the state of Britain at the time of its separation from the Western empire. Gildas describes in florid language the improvements of agriculture, the foreign trade which flowed with every tide into the Thames and the Severn the solid and lofty construction of public and private edifices; he accuses the sinful luxury of the British people; of a people, according to the same writer, ignorant of the most simple arts, and incapable, without the aid of the Romans, of providing walls of stone, or weapons of iron, for the defence of their native land. Under the long dominion of the emperors, Britain had been insensibly moulded into the elegant and servile form of a Roman province, whose safety was intrusted to a foreign power. The subjects of Honorius contemplated their new freedom with surprise and terror; they were left destitute of any civil or military constitution; and their uncertain rulers wanted either skill, or courage, or authority, to direct the public force against the common enemy. The introduction of the Saxons betrayed their internal weakness, and degraded the character both of the prince and people. Their consternation magnified the danger; the want of union diminished their resources; and the madness of civil factions was more solicitous to accuse, than to remedy, the evils, which they imputed to the misconduct of their adversaries. Yet the Britons were not ignorant, they could not be ignorant, of the manufacture or the use of arms; the successive and disorderly attacks of the Saxons allowed them to recover from their amazement, and the prosperous or adverse events of the war added discipline and experience to their native valor.
A monk, who, in the deep ignorance of human life, has taken it upon himself to act as a historian, oddly misrepresents the state of Britain at the time it separated from the Western Empire. Gildas describes in elaborate language the advancements in agriculture, the foreign trade that flowed steadily into the Thames and the Severn, and the sturdy and impressive construction of public and private buildings; he criticizes the sinful luxury of the British people, who, according to the same writer, were unaware of the most basic skills and were unable, without Roman help, to produce stone walls or iron weapons to defend their homeland. Under the long rule of the emperors, Britain had gradually been shaped into the refined and submissive form of a Roman province, whose safety relied on a foreign power. The subjects of Honorius looked upon their new freedom with both surprise and fear; they were left without any civil or military structure, and their uncertain leaders lacked the skill, courage, or authority to mobilize the public force against a common enemy. The arrival of the Saxons revealed their internal weaknesses and tarnished the reputation of both the rulers and the people. Their panic exaggerated the threat; the lack of unity reduced their resources; and the chaos of civil factions was more concerned with blaming others than solving the problems caused by their opponents' mismanagement. Yet the Britons were not ignorant; they could not have been ignorant of how to make or use weapons; the repeated and chaotic attacks from the Saxons allowed them to shake off their shock, and the outcomes of the war, whether favorable or unfavorable, added discipline and experience to their natural bravery.
While the continent of Europe and Africa yielded, without resistance, to the Barbarians, the British island, alone and unaided, maintained a long, a vigorous, though an unsuccessful, struggle, against the formidable pirates, who, almost at the same instant, assaulted the Northern, the Eastern, and the Southern coasts. The cities which had been fortified with skill, were defended with resolution; the advantages of ground, hills, forests, and morasses, were diligently improved by the inhabitants; the conquest of each district was purchased with blood; and the defeats of the Saxons are strongly attested by the discreet silence of their annalist. Hengist might hope to achieve the conquest of Britain; but his ambition, in an active reign of thirty-five years, was confined to the possession of Kent; and the numerous colony which he had planted in the North, was extirpated by the sword of the Britons. The monarchy of the West Saxons was laboriously founded by the persevering efforts of three martial generations. The life of Cerdic, one of the bravest of the children of Woden, was consumed in the conquest of Hampshire, and the Isle of Wight; and the loss which he sustained in the battle of Mount Badon, reduced him to a state of inglorious repose. Kenric, his valiant son, advanced into Wiltshire; besieged Salisbury, at that time seated on a commanding eminence; and vanquished an army which advanced to the relief of the city. In the subsequent battle of Marlborough, his British enemies displayed their military science. Their troops were formed in three lines; each line consisted of three distinct bodies, and the cavalry, the archers, and the pikemen, were distributed according to the principles of Roman tactics. The Saxons charged in one weighty column, boldly encountered with their short swords the long lances of the Britons, and maintained an equal conflict till the approach of night. Two decisive victories, the death of three British kings, and the reduction of Cirencester, Bath, and Gloucester, established the fame and power of Ceaulin, the grandson of Cerdic, who carried his victorious arms to the banks of the Severn.
While Europe and Africa surrendered easily to the Barbarians, the British Isles stood firm, fighting a long and intense, though ultimately unsuccessful, battle against the powerful pirates who attacked the Northern, Eastern, and Southern coasts almost simultaneously. The cities, fortified with skill, were defended with determination; the inhabitants expertly utilized the advantages of the landscape, including hills, forests, and marshes. Each district was fought for with bloodshed, and the defeats of the Saxons are well documented by the thoughtful silence of their chroniclers. Hengist may have hoped to conquer Britain, but during his active reign of thirty-five years, he only managed to claim Kent, and the many colonies he established in the North were wiped out by the Britons. The monarchy of the West Saxons was painstakingly established through the relentless efforts of three military generations. The life of Cerdic, one of Woden’s bravest descendants, was spent conquering Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, and after suffering losses in the battle of Mount Badon, he was left in a state of lowly quietude. His brave son, Kenric, advanced into Wiltshire, laid siege to Salisbury, which was then positioned on a high ground, and defeated an army that came to aid the city. In the following battle at Marlborough, his British foes showcased their military tactics. Their forces were organized in three lines; each line consisted of three separate units, and the cavalry, archers, and pikemen were arranged according to Roman principles. The Saxons charged in a heavy column, bravely facing the Britons’ long spears with their short swords, maintaining an equal fight until nightfall. Two significant victories, the deaths of three British kings, and the capture of Cirencester, Bath, and Gloucester solidified the fame and strength of Ceaulin, the grandson of Cerdic, who carried his victorious forces to the banks of the Severn.
After a war of a hundred years, the independent Britons still occupied the whole extent of the Western coast, from the wall of Antoninus to the extreme promontory of Cornwall; and the principal cities of the inland country still opposed the arms of the Barbarians. Resistance became more languid, as the number and boldness of the assailants continually increased. Winning their way by slow and painful efforts, the Saxons, the Angles, and their various confederates, advanced from the North, from the East, and from the South, till their victorious banners were united in the centre of the island. Beyond the Severn the Britons still asserted their national freedom, which survived the heptarchy, and even the monarchy, of the Saxons. The bravest warriors, who preferred exile to slavery, found a secure refuge in the mountains of Wales: the reluctant submission of Cornwall was delayed for some ages; and a band of fugitives acquired a settlement in Gaul, by their own valor, or the liberality of the Merovingian kings. The Western angle of Armorica acquired the new appellations of Cornwall, and the Lesser Britain; and the vacant lands of the Osismii were filled by a strange people, who, under the authority of their counts and bishops, preserved the laws and language of their ancestors. To the feeble descendants of Clovis and Charlemagne, the Britons of Armorica refused the customary tribute, subdued the neighboring dioceses of Vannes, Rennes, and Nantes, and formed a powerful, though vassal, state, which has been united to the crown of France.
After a hundred-year war, the independent Britons still controlled the entire Western coast, from Antoninus’ wall to the far tip of Cornwall; and the main cities in the inland areas still resisted the Barbarians’ attacks. Their resistance grew weaker as the attackers became more numerous and aggressive. With slow and challenging progress, the Saxons, the Angles, and their various allies moved in from the North, East, and South until their victorious banners met in the center of the island. Beyond the Severn, the Britons continued to assert their national freedom, which survived the heptarchy and even the Saxon monarchy. The bravest warriors, who chose exile over slavery, found safety in the mountains of Wales; the forced submission of Cornwall took a long time; and a group of refugees established themselves in Gaul, thanks to their own courage or the kindness of the Merovingian kings. The western part of Armorica came to be known as Cornwall and Lesser Britain, and the empty lands of the Osismii were populated by a new group of people who, under the leadership of their counts and bishops, maintained the laws and language of their forefathers. The weakened descendants of Clovis and Charlemagne were denied the usual tribute by the Britons of Armorica, who conquered the nearby dioceses of Vannes, Rennes, and Nantes, and formed a strong, albeit vassal, state that became united with the French crown.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part V.
In a century of perpetual, or at least implacable, war, much courage, and some skill, must have been exerted for the defence of Britain. Yet if the memory of its champions is almost buried in oblivion, we need not repine; since every age, however destitute of science or virtue, sufficiently abounds with acts of blood and military renown. The tomb of Vortimer, the son of Vortigern, was erected on the margin of the sea-shore, as a landmark formidable to the Saxons, whom he had thrice vanquished in the fields of Kent. Ambrosius Aurelian was descended from a noble family of Romans; his modesty was equal to his valor, and his valor, till the last fatal action, was crowned with splendid success. But every British name is effaced by the illustrious name of Arthur, the hereditary prince of the Silures, in South Wales, and the elective king or general of the nation. According to the most rational account, he defeated, in twelve successive battles, the Angles of the North, and the Saxons of the West; but the declining age of the hero was imbittered by popular ingratitude and domestic misfortunes. The events of his life are less interesting than the singular revolutions of his fame. During a period of five hundred years the tradition of his exploits was preserved, and rudely embellished, by the obscure bards of Wales and Armorica, who were odious to the Saxons, and unknown to the rest of mankind. The pride and curiosity of the Norman conquerors prompted them to inquire into the ancient history of Britain: they listened with fond credulity to the tale of Arthur, and eagerly applauded the merit of a prince who had triumphed over the Saxons, their common enemies. His romance, transcribed in the Latin of Jeffrey of Monmouth, and afterwards translated into the fashionable idiom of the times, was enriched with the various, though incoherent, ornaments which were familiar to the experience, the learning, or the fancy, of the twelfth century. The progress of a Phrygian colony, from the Tyber to the Thames, was easily ingrafted on the fable of the Æneid; and the royal ancestors of Arthur derived their origin from Troy, and claimed their alliance with the Cæsars. His trophies were decorated with captive provinces and Imperial titles; and his Danish victories avenged the recent injuries of his country. The gallantry and superstition of the British hero, his feasts and tournaments, and the memorable institution of his Knights of the Round Table, were faithfully copied from the reigning manners of chivalry; and the fabulous exploits of Uther's son appear less incredible than the adventures which were achieved by the enterprising valor of the Normans. Pilgrimage, and the holy wars, introduced into Europe the specious miracles of Arabian magic. Fairies and giants, flying dragons, and enchanted palaces, were blended with the more simple fictions of the West; and the fate of Britain depended on the art, or the predictions, of Merlin. Every nation embraced and adorned the popular romance of Arthur, and the Knights of the Round Table: their names were celebrated in Greece and Italy; and the voluminous tales of Sir Lancelot and Sir Tristram were devoutly studied by the princes and nobles, who disregarded the genuine heroes and historians of antiquity. At length the light of science and reason was rekindled; the talisman was broken; the visionary fabric melted into air; and by a natural, though unjust, reverse of the public opinion, the severity of the present age is inclined to question the existence of Arthur.
In a century marked by constant, or at least relentless, warfare, a great deal of bravery and some skill must have been shown in defending Britain. But if the memories of its heroes have almost faded into obscurity, there's no need to be upset; every era, no matter how lacking in knowledge or virtue, has its share of bloodshed and military glory. The tomb of Vortimer, the son of Vortigern, was built by the seashore, standing as a significant marker to the Saxons, whom he had defeated three times in battle in Kent. Ambrosius Aurelian came from a noble Roman family; his humility matched his courage, and that courage, until his final battle, was marked by great success. However, every British name takes a backseat to the legendary name of Arthur, the hereditary prince of the Silures in South Wales, and the elected king or general of the nation. According to the best accounts, he won twelve consecutive battles against the Angles from the North and the Saxons from the West; yet, the later years of his life were marred by public ingratitude and personal misfortunes. The details of his life are less fascinating than the unusual turns of his legacy. Over five hundred years, the stories of his deeds were preserved and roughly embellished by the obscure bards of Wales and Armorica, who were reviled by the Saxons and unknown to the rest of the world. The pride and curiosity of the Norman conquerors led them to delve into Britain’s ancient history: they listened with eager belief to the tales of Arthur and enthusiastically praised a prince who had defeated the Saxons, their common foes. His legend, recorded in the Latin of Geoffrey of Monmouth and later translated into the popular language of the time, was filled with various, though disjointed, embellishments that reflected the experiences, learning, or imagination of the twelfth century. The story of a Phrygian colony moving from the Tiber to the Thames easily linked to the myth of the Æneid, with Arthur's royal lineage tracing back to Troy and claiming connections to the Caesars. His trophies were adorned with conquered lands and imperial titles, while his victories over the Danes avenged his country's recent wrongs. The bravery and superstitions of the British hero, his feasts and tournaments, and the memorable establishment of his Knights of the Round Table were modeled on the prevailing customs of chivalry; the legendary feats of Uther’s son seem less unbelievable than those accomplished by the bold Normans. Pilgrimages and holy wars brought the captivating miracles of Arabian magic into Europe. Fairies and giants, flying dragons, and enchanted castles were mixed with simpler tales from the West; and Britain's fate relied on the magic or prophecies of Merlin. Every nation embraced and enhanced the popular stories of Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table: their names were celebrated in Greece and Italy, and the extensive tales of Sir Lancelot and Sir Tristram were diligently studied by princes and nobles who overlooked the true heroes and historians of the past. Eventually, the light of science and reason was reignited; the illusion was shattered; the fantastical world dissolved into nothing; and due to a natural, if unfair, change in public sentiment, the severity of today’s age tends to question the existence of Arthur.
Resistance, if it cannot avert, must increase the miseries of conquest; and conquest has never appeared more dreadful and destructive than in the hands of the Saxons; who hated the valor of their enemies, disdained the faith of treaties, and violated, without remorse, the most sacred objects of the Christian worship. The fields of battle might be traced, almost in every district, by monuments of bones; the fragments of falling towers were stained with blood; the last of the Britons, without distinction of age or sex, was massacred, in the ruins of Anderida; and the repetition of such calamities was frequent and familiar under the Saxon heptarchy. The arts and religion, the laws and language, which the Romans had so carefully planted in Britain, were extirpated by their barbarous successors. After the destruction of the principal churches, the bishops, who had declined the crown of martyrdom, retired with the holy relics into Wales and Armorica; the remains of their flocks were left destitute of any spiritual food; the practice, and even the remembrance, of Christianity were abolished; and the British clergy might obtain some comfort from the damnation of the idolatrous strangers. The kings of France maintained the privileges of their Roman subjects; but the ferocious Saxons trampled on the laws of Rome, and of the emperors. The proceedings of civil and criminal jurisdiction, the titles of honor, the forms of office, the ranks of society, and even the domestic rights of marriage, testament, and inheritance, were finally suppressed; and the indiscriminate crowd of noble and plebeian slaves was governed by the traditionary customs, which had been coarsely framed for the shepherds and pirates of Germany. The language of science, of business, and of conversation, which had been introduced by the Romans, was lost in the general desolation. A sufficient number of Latin or Celtic words might be assumed by the Germans, to express their new wants and ideas; but those illiterate Pagans preserved and established the use of their national dialect. Almost every name, conspicuous either in the church or state, reveals its Teutonic origin; and the geography of England was universally inscribed with foreign characters and appellations. The example of a revolution, so rapid and so complete, may not easily be found; but it will excite a probable suspicion, that the arts of Rome were less deeply rooted in Britain than in Gaul or Spain; and that the native rudeness of the country and its inhabitants was covered by a thin varnish of Italian manners.
Resistance, if it can't stop it, only adds to the suffering of conquest; and conquest has never seemed more terrifying and destructive than in the hands of the Saxons, who hated their enemies' bravery, ignored the faith in treaties, and shamelessly violated the most sacred aspects of Christian worship. The battlefields could almost be traced in every region by piles of bones; the ruins of towers were stained with blood; the last of the Britons, regardless of age or gender, were slaughtered in the wreckage of Anderida; and such disasters were common and familiar during the Saxon heptarchy. The arts, religion, laws, and language that the Romans had carefully established in Britain were wiped out by their barbaric successors. After the main churches were destroyed, the bishops, who had avoided martyrdom, retreated with the holy relics to Wales and Armorica; the remnants of their congregations were left without any spiritual nourishment; the practice and even the memory of Christianity were abolished; and the British clergy found some comfort in the damnation of the idolatrous outsiders. The kings of France upheld the rights of their Roman subjects, but the brutal Saxons disregarded the laws of Rome and the emperors. Civil and criminal jurisdiction, titles of honor, office structures, social ranks, and even the personal rights related to marriage, wills, and inheritance were ultimately suppressed; and the indiscriminate sea of noble and common slaves was ruled by the traditional customs, poorly crafted for the shepherds and pirates of Germany. The language of science, business, and everyday conversation, introduced by the Romans, was lost amidst the widespread devastation. A sufficient number of Latin or Celtic words might have been adopted by the Germans to express their new needs and ideas, but those illiterate Pagans kept and established their national language. Nearly every name, significant in either the church or state, shows its Teutonic roots; and the geography of England was filled with foreign names and labels. An example of a revolution this swift and complete is rare; but it raises a reasonable suspicion that Roman culture was less deeply embedded in Britain than in Gaul or Spain, and that the local roughness of the land and its people was merely covered by a thin gloss of Italian manners.
This strange alteration has persuaded historians, and even philosophers, that the provincials of Britain were totally exterminated; and that the vacant land was again peopled by the perpetual influx, and rapid increase, of the German colonies. Three hundred thousand Saxons are said to have obeyed the summons of Hengist; the entire emigration of the Angles was attested, in the age of Bede, by the solitude of their native country; and our experience has shown the free propagation of the human race, if they are cast on a fruitful wilderness, where their steps are unconfined, and their subsistence is plentiful. The Saxon kingdoms displayed the face of recent discovery and cultivation; the towns were small, the villages were distant; the husbandry was languid and unskilful; four sheep were equivalent to an acre of the best land; an ample space of wood and morass was resigned to the vague dominion of nature; and the modern bishopric of Durham, the whole territory from the Tyne to the Tees, had returned to its primitive state of a savage and solitary forest. Such imperfect population might have been supplied, in some generations, by the English colonies; but neither reason nor facts can justify the unnatural supposition, that the Saxons of Britain remained alone in the desert which they had subdued. After the sanguinary Barbarians had secured their dominion, and gratified their revenge, it was their interest to preserve the peasants as well as the cattle, of the unresisting country. In each successive revolution, the patient herd becomes the property of its new masters; and the salutary compact of food and labor is silently ratified by their mutual necessities. Wilfrid, the apostle of Sussex, accepted from his royal convert the gift of the peninsula of Selsey, near Chichester, with the persons and property of its inhabitants, who then amounted to eighty-seven families. He released them at once from spiritual and temporal bondage; and two hundred and fifty slaves of both sexes were baptized by their indulgent master. The kingdom of Sussex, which spread from the sea to the Thames, contained seven thousand families; twelve hundred were ascribed to the Isle of Wight; and, if we multiply this vague computation, it may seem probable, that England was cultivated by a million of servants, or villains, who were attached to the estates of their arbitrary landlords. The indigent Barbarians were often tempted to sell their children, or themselves into perpetual, and even foreign, bondage; yet the special exemptions which were granted to national slaves, sufficiently declare that they were much less numerous than the strangers and captives, who had lost their liberty, or changed their masters, by the accidents of war. When time and religion had mitigated the fierce spirit of the Anglo-Saxons, the laws encouraged the frequent practice of manumission; and their subjects, of Welsh or Cambrian extraction, assumed the respectable station of inferior freemen, possessed of lands, and entitled to the rights of civil society. Such gentle treatment might secure the allegiance of a fierce people, who had been recently subdued on the confines of Wales and Cornwall. The sage Ina, the legislator of Wessex, united the two nations in the bands of domestic alliance; and four British lords of Somersetshire may be honorably distinguished in the court of a Saxon monarch.
This strange change has led historians, and even philosophers, to believe that the people of Britain were completely wiped out; and that the empty land was soon filled again by the constant influx and rapid growth of German settlers. It's said that three hundred thousand Saxons responded to Hengist's call; the total migration of the Angles was confirmed, in Bede's time, by the emptiness of their homeland; and our experience shows that the human race can thrive if placed in a fertile wilderness, where they have freedom to move and plenty to eat. The Saxon kingdoms showed signs of recent discovery and farming; the towns were small, the villages were scattered; farming was sluggish and unskilled; four sheep were worth an acre of the best land; a large area of woods and marshland was left to the undisturbed control of nature; and the modern bishopric of Durham, the whole area from the Tyne to the Tees, had reverted to its original state of a wild, lonely forest. Such an inadequate population could have been supported, over generations, by the English colonies; but neither logic nor evidence can justify the unlikely idea that the Saxons in Britain were alone in the barren land they had conquered. After the bloody Barbarians secured their territory and satisfied their revenge, it was in their interest to keep the peasants as well as the livestock of the defenseless land. With each new upheaval, the patient population becomes the property of its new owners; and the beneficial agreement of food and labor is quietly confirmed by their mutual needs. Wilfrid, the apostle of Sussex, accepted from his royal convert the gift of the peninsula of Selsey, near Chichester, along with the people and property of its inhabitants, who then numbered eighty-seven families. He freed them from both spiritual and earthly bondage right away; and two hundred and fifty slaves of both genders were baptized by their kind master. The kingdom of Sussex, stretching from the sea to the Thames, held seven thousand families; twelve hundred were attributed to the Isle of Wight; and if we multiply this rough estimate, it seems likely that England was cultivated by a million laborers, or villains, who were tied to the lands of their arbitrary landlords. The impoverished Barbarians were often tempted to sell their children, or even themselves, into permanent, and sometimes foreign, servitude; yet the special privileges given to national slaves clearly indicate that they were far fewer than the foreigners and captives, who had lost their freedom or changed their masters due to the events of war. As time passed and religion softened the fierce spirit of the Anglo-Saxons, the laws encouraged the frequent practice of freeing slaves; and their subjects, of Welsh or Cambrian descent, took on the respectable status of lower-class freemen, owning land, and entitled to the rights of society. Such humane treatment might help maintain the loyalty of a fierce people, recently conquered on the borders of Wales and Cornwall. The wise Ina, the legislator of Wessex, brought the two nations together in familial bonds; and four British lords from Somersetshire could be honorably recognized in the court of a Saxon king.
The independent Britons appear to have relapsed into the state of original barbarism, from whence they had been imperfectly reclaimed. Separated by their enemies from the rest of mankind, they soon became an object of scandal and abhorrence to the Catholic world. Christianity was still professed in the mountains of Wales; but the rude schismatics, in the form of the clerical tonsure, and in the day of the celebration of Easter, obstinately resisted the imperious mandates of the Roman pontiffs. The use of the Latin language was insensibly abolished, and the Britons were deprived of the art and learning which Italy communicated to her Saxon proselytes. In Wales and Armorica, the Celtic tongue, the native idiom of the West, was preserved and propagated; and the Bards, who had been the companions of the Druids, were still protected, in the sixteenth century, by the laws of Elizabeth. Their chief, a respectable officer of the courts of Pengwern, or Aberfraw, or Caermarthen, accompanied the king's servants to war: the monarchy of the Britons, which he sung in the front of battle, excited their courage, and justified their depredations; and the songster claimed for his legitimate prize the fairest heifer of the spoil. His subordinate ministers, the masters and disciples of vocal and instrumental music, visited, in their respective circuits, the royal, the noble, and the plebeian houses; and the public poverty, almost exhausted by the clergy, was oppressed by the importunate demands of the bards. Their rank and merit were ascertained by solemn trials, and the strong belief of supernatural inspiration exalted the fancy of the poet, and of his audience. The last retreats of Celtic freedom, the extreme territories of Gaul and Britain, were less adapted to agriculture than to pasturage: the wealth of the Britons consisted in their flocks and herds; milk and flesh were their ordinary food; and bread was sometimes esteemed, or rejected, as a foreign luxury. Liberty had peopled the mountains of Wales and the morasses of Armorica; but their populousness has been maliciously ascribed to the loose practice of polygamy; and the houses of these licentious barbarians have been supposed to contain ten wives, and perhaps fifty children. Their disposition was rash and choleric; they were bold in action and in speech; and as they were ignorant of the arts of peace, they alternately indulged their passions in foreign and domestic war. The cavalry of Armorica, the spearmen of Gwent, and the archers of Merioneth, were equally formidable; but their poverty could seldom procure either shields or helmets; and the inconvenient weight would have retarded the speed and agility of their desultory operations. One of the greatest of the English monarchs was requested to satisfy the curiosity of a Greek emperor concerning the state of Britain; and Henry II. could assert, from his personal experience, that Wales was inhabited by a race of naked warriors, who encountered, without fear, the defensive armor of their enemies.
The independent Britons seem to have returned to a state of primitive barbarism, from which they had only been partially redeemed. Cut off from the rest of humanity by their enemies, they quickly became a source of scandal and disgust to the Catholic world. Christianity was still present in the mountains of Wales, but the rough dissenters, marked by their clerical haircuts and their celebration of Easter on different days, stubbornly rejected the strict orders of the Roman popes. The use of Latin gradually faded away, and the Britons lost the education and knowledge that Italy shared with her Saxon converts. In Wales and Armorica, the Celtic language, the native tongue of the West, was maintained and spread; and the Bards, who had once been companions to the Druids, were still protected in the sixteenth century by the laws of Elizabeth. Their leader, a respected officer from the courts of Pengwern, Aberfraw, or Caermarthen, went to war alongside the king's servants: his songs about the British monarchy inspired courage in battle and justified their raids, while he claimed as his rightful reward the finest heifer from the spoils. His assistant musicians, teachers and students of vocal and instrumental music, traveled to royal, noble, and common homes; the community's poverty, nearly depleted by the clergy, was burdened by the relentless demands of the bards. Their social standing and talent were determined through formal competitions, and the strong belief in supernatural inspiration elevated the imagination of both the poet and his audience. The last strongholds of Celtic freedom, the far reaches of Gaul and Britain, were less suited for farming than for grazing: the wealth of the Britons lay in their livestock; milk and meat were their everyday food, and bread was sometimes considered a foreign luxury. Freedom had populated the mountains of Wales and the marshes of Armorica, but their high numbers have been wrongly attributed to the lax practice of polygamy, with the homes of these unruly barbarians believed to hold ten wives and perhaps fifty children. Their temperament was reckless and hot-headed; they were bold in both action and speech; and as they were unaware of peaceful ways, they often indulged their passions in both foreign and domestic conflicts. The cavalry of Armorica, the spearmen of Gwent, and the archers of Merioneth were all formidable; however, they could rarely afford shields or helmets, and the extra weight would have slowed down their quick and agile attacks. One of the greatest English kings was once asked to inform a Greek emperor about the state of Britain, and Henry II could personally confirm that Wales was home to a people of naked warriors who faced their enemies' armor without fear.
By the revolution of Britain, the limits of science, as well as of empire, were contracted. The dark cloud, which had been cleared by the Phoenician discoveries, and finally dispelled by the arms of Cæsar, again settled on the shores of the Atlantic, and a Roman province was again lost among the fabulous Islands of the Ocean. One hundred and fifty years after the reign of Honorius, the gravest historian of the times describes the wonders of a remote isle, whose eastern and western parts are divided by an antique wall, the boundary of life and death, or, more properly, of truth and fiction. The east is a fair country, inhabited by a civilized people: the air is healthy, the waters are pure and plentiful, and the earth yields her regular and fruitful increase. In the west, beyond the wall, the air is infectious and mortal; the ground is covered with serpents; and this dreary solitude is the region of departed spirits, who are transported from the opposite shores in substantial boats, and by living rowers. Some families of fishermen, the subjects of the Franks, are excused from tribute, in consideration of the mysterious office which is performed by these Charons of the ocean. Each in his turn is summoned, at the hour of midnight, to hear the voices, and even the names, of the ghosts: he is sensible of their weight, and he feels himself impelled by an unknown, but irresistible power. After this dream of fancy, we read with astonishment, that the name of this island is Brittia; that it lies in the ocean, against the mouth of the Rhine, and less than thirty miles from the continent; that it is possessed by three nations, the Frisians, the Angles, and the Britons; and that some Angles had appeared at Constantinople, in the train of the French ambassadors. From these ambassadors Procopius might be informed of a singular, though not improbable, adventure, which announces the spirit, rather than the delicacy, of an English heroine. She had been betrothed to Radiger, king of the Varni, a tribe of Germans who touched the ocean and the Rhine; but the perfidious lover was tempted, by motives of policy, to prefer his father's widow, the sister of Theodebert, king of the Franks. The forsaken princess of the Angles, instead of bewailing, revenged her disgrace. Her warlike subjects are said to have been ignorant of the use, and even of the form, of a horse; but she boldly sailed from Britain to the mouth of the Rhine, with a fleet of four hundred ships, and an army of one hundred thousand men. After the loss of a battle, the captive Radiger implored the mercy of his victorious bride, who generously pardoned his offence, dismissed her rival, and compelled the king of the Varni to discharge with honor and fidelity the duties of a husband. This gallant exploit appears to be the last naval enterprise of the Anglo-Saxons. The arts of navigation, by which they acquired the empire of Britain and of the sea, were soon neglected by the indolent Barbarians, who supinely renounced all the commercial advantages of their insular situation. Seven independent kingdoms were agitated by perpetual discord; and the British world was seldom connected, either in peace or war, with the nations of the Continent.
By the revolution in Britain, the boundaries of science and empire were reduced. The dark cloud that had been lifted by the Phoenician discoveries and finally dispelled by Caesar’s military campaigns settled once more on the shores of the Atlantic, and a Roman province was lost again among the legendary Islands of the Ocean. One hundred and fifty years after the reign of Honorius, the most serious historian of that time describes the wonders of a distant island, whose eastern and western parts are separated by an ancient wall, a boundary between life and death, or more accurately, between truth and fiction. The east is a beautiful land inhabited by a civilized people: the air is healthy, the waters are pure and abundant, and the earth regularly produces a fruitful harvest. In the west, beyond the wall, the air is toxic and deadly; the ground is swarming with snakes; and this bleak solitude is the realm of departed souls, who are transported from the other side in solid boats, rowed by living oarsmen. Some fishing families, subjects of the Franks, are exempt from taxes due to the mysterious role played by these ferrymen of the ocean. Each is called in turn at midnight to hear the voices, even the names, of the spirits: he feels their weight and senses himself compelled by an unknown but irresistible force. Following this fanciful dream, we read with amazement that the island is called Brittia; it lies in the ocean, at the mouth of the Rhine, and less than thirty miles from the mainland; it is inhabited by three nations: the Frisians, the Angles, and the Britons; and some Angles had appeared in Constantinople as part of the French ambassadors' entourage. From these ambassadors, Procopius could hear of a unique, though not unlikely, adventure that reveals the spirit, rather than the delicacy, of an English heroine. She had been engaged to Radiger, king of the Varni, a German tribe that bordered the ocean and the Rhine; however, the treacherous lover was tempted by political motives to choose his father’s widow, the sister of Theodebert, king of the Franks. The abandoned princess of the Angles, instead of mourning, avenged her betrayal. Her warlike followers were said to be unfamiliar with the use, or even the appearance, of a horse; yet she courageously sailed from Britain to the mouth of the Rhine with a fleet of four hundred ships and an army of one hundred thousand men. After losing a battle, the captured Radiger begged for the mercy of his victorious bride, who generously forgave him, sent away her rival, and made the king of the Varni fulfill the duties of a husband with honor and loyalty. This bold action seems to be the last naval venture of the Anglo-Saxons. The navigation skills that enabled them to gain control of Britain and the seas were soon neglected by the lazy Barbarians, who passively gave up the commercial advantages of their island location. Seven independent kingdoms were caught in constant conflict, and the British world was rarely connected, either in peace or war, with the nations of the Continent.
I have now accomplished the laborious narrative of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, from the fortunate age of Trajan and the Antonines, to its total extinction in the West, about five centuries after the Christian era. At that unhappy period, the Saxons fiercely struggled with the natives for the possession of Britain: Gaul and Spain were divided between the powerful monarchies of the Franks and Visigoths, and the dependent kingdoms of the Suevi and Burgundians: Africa was exposed to the cruel persecution of the Vandals, and the savage insults of the Moors: Rome and Italy, as far as the banks of the Danube, were afflicted by an army of Barbarian mercenaries, whose lawless tyranny was succeeded by the reign of Theodoric the Ostrogoth. All the subjects of the empire, who, by the use of the Latin language, more particularly deserved the name and privileges of Romans, were oppressed by the disgrace and calamities of foreign conquest; and the victorious nations of Germany established a new system of manners and government in the western countries of Europe. The majesty of Rome was faintly represented by the princes of Constantinople, the feeble and imaginary successors of Augustus. Yet they continued to reign over the East, from the Danube to the Nile and Tigris; the Gothic and Vandal kingdoms of Italy and Africa were subverted by the arms of Justinian; and the history of the Greek emperors may still afford a long series of instructive lessons, and interesting revolutions.
I have now finished the detailed story of the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, starting from the prosperous era of Trajan and the Antonines to its complete destruction in the West, roughly five centuries after the beginning of the Christian era. During that unfortunate time, the Saxons fought fiercely with the locals for control of Britain; Gaul and Spain were split between the strong kingdoms of the Franks and Visigoths, along with the smaller kingdoms of the Suevi and Burgundians. Africa was under the harsh persecution of the Vandals and the brutal attacks of the Moors. Rome and Italy, extending to the banks of the Danube, were troubled by a horde of barbarian mercenaries, whose reckless tyranny was later replaced by the rule of Theodoric the Ostrogoth. All the subjects of the empire who, by speaking Latin, particularly earned the title and privileges of Romans, were weighed down by the shame and disasters of foreign conquest; and the victorious nations of Germany established a new way of life and government in the western parts of Europe. The greatness of Rome was only faintly reflected by the princes of Constantinople, the weak and illusory heirs of Augustus. Yet they continued to rule over the East, from the Danube to the Nile and Tigris; the Gothic and Vandal kingdoms in Italy and Africa were toppled by the military might of Justinian; and the history of the Greek emperors still offers a long list of valuable lessons and captivating events.
Chapter XXXVIII: Reign Of Clovis.—Part VI.
General Observations On The Fall Of The Roman Empire In The West.
The Greeks, after their country had been reduced into a province, imputed the triumphs of Rome, not to the merit, but to the fortune, of the republic. The inconstant goddess, who so blindly distributes and resumes her favors, had now consented (such was the language of envious flattery) to resign her wings, to descend from her globe, and to fix her firm and immutable throne on the banks of the Tyber. A wiser Greek, who has composed, with a philosophic spirit, the memorable history of his own times, deprived his countrymen of this vain and delusive comfort, by opening to their view the deep foundations of the greatness of Rome. The fidelity of the citizens to each other, and to the state, was confirmed by the habits of education, and the prejudices of religion. Honor, as well as virtue, was the principle of the republic; the ambitious citizens labored to deserve the solemn glories of a triumph; and the ardor of the Roman youth was kindled into active emulation, as often as they beheld the domestic images of their ancestors. The temperate struggles of the patricians and plebeians had finally established the firm and equal balance of the constitution; which united the freedom of popular assemblies, with the authority and wisdom of a senate, and the executive powers of a regal magistrate. When the consul displayed the standard of the republic, each citizen bound himself, by the obligation of an oath, to draw his sword in the cause of his country, till he had discharged the sacred duty by a military service of ten years. This wise institution continually poured into the field the rising generations of freemen and soldiers; and their numbers were reënforced by the warlike and populous states of Italy, who, after a brave resistance, had yielded to the valor and embraced the alliance, of the Romans. The sage historian, who excited the virtue of the younger Scipio, and beheld the ruin of Carthage, has accurately described their military system; their levies, arms, exercises, subordination, marches, encampments; and the invincible legion, superior in active strength to the Macedonian phalanx of Philip and Alexander. From these institutions of peace and war Polybius has deduced the spirit and success of a people, incapable of fear, and impatient of repose. The ambitious design of conquest, which might have been defeated by the seasonable conspiracy of mankind, was attempted and achieved; and the perpetual violation of justice was maintained by the political virtues of prudence and courage. The arms of the republic, sometimes vanquished in battle, always victorious in war, advanced with rapid steps to the Euphrates, the Danube, the Rhine, and the Ocean; and the images of gold, or silver, or brass, that might serve to represent the nations and their kings, were successively broken by the iron monarchy of Rome.
The Greeks, after their country had been turned into a province, attributed the victories of Rome not to their merit but to the luck of the republic. The fickle goddess, who randomly gives and takes away her favors, had now been said (so claimed the envious flatterers) to give up her wings, come down from her globe, and establish her firm and unchanging throne by the banks of the Tiber. A more insightful Greek, who wrote a thoughtful history of his own times, took away this empty and misleading comfort from his countrymen by revealing the solid foundations of Rome's greatness. The loyalty of citizens to one another and to the state was reinforced by education and the beliefs of their religion. Honor and virtue were the principles of the republic; ambitious citizens worked to earn the solemn glory of a triumph, and the passion of Roman youth ignited into active competition whenever they saw the domestic images of their ancestors. The careful struggles between the patricians and plebeians had finally created a strong and equal balance in the constitution, which combined the freedom of popular assemblies with the authority and wisdom of a senate and the executive powers of a kingly magistrate. When the consul raised the flag of the republic, each citizen pledged, under oath, to take up arms for their country until they fulfilled the sacred duty of ten years of military service. This wise system consistently brought new generations of free men and soldiers into the field, and their numbers were bolstered by the warlike and populous states of Italy, who, after a brave fight, accepted Roman valor and formed an alliance. The wise historian, who inspired the virtue of the younger Scipio and witnessed the downfall of Carthage, accurately described their military system: their recruitment, weapons, training, hierarchy, marches, camps; and the unbeatable legion, stronger in active force than Philip and Alexander's Macedonian phalanx. From these methods of peace and war, Polybius derived the spirit and success of a people who were fearless and restless. The ambitious goal of conquest, which could have been thwarted by a timely uprising of people, was pursued and achieved, while the ongoing violations of justice were sustained by the political virtues of wisdom and bravery. The republic's forces, sometimes defeated in battle but always victorious in war, advanced rapidly to the Euphrates, the Danube, the Rhine, and the Ocean, as the images made of gold, silver, or bronze representing nations and their kings were systematically shattered by the iron monarchy of Rome.
The rise of a city, which swelled into an empire, may deserve, as a singular prodigy, the reflection of a philosophic mind. But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest; and as soon as time or accident had removed the artificial supports, the stupendous fabric yielded to the pressure of its own weight. The story of its ruin is simple and obvious; and instead of inquiring why the Roman empire was destroyed, we should rather be surprised that it had subsisted so long. The victorious legions, who, in distant wars, acquired the vices of strangers and mercenaries, first oppressed the freedom of the republic, and afterwards violated the majesty of the purple. The emperors, anxious for their personal safety and the public peace, were reduced to the base expedient of corrupting the discipline which rendered them alike formidable to their sovereign and to the enemy; the vigor of the military government was relaxed, and finally dissolved, by the partial institutions of Constantine; and the Roman world was overwhelmed by a deluge of Barbarians.
The rise of a city that grew into an empire is certainly remarkable and may inspire philosophical reflection. However, the decline of Rome was a natural and unavoidable result of its excessive greatness. Prosperity nurtured the seeds of decay; the reasons for destruction increased alongside the extent of its conquests. Once time or circumstance removed its artificial supports, the massive structure collapsed under its own weight. The tale of its downfall is straightforward and clear; instead of asking why the Roman Empire fell, we should be more surprised that it lasted as long as it did. The victorious legions, who picked up the vices of foreign places and mercenaries during distant wars, initially oppressed the freedoms of the republic and later desecrated the power of the emperor. The emperors, worried for their safety and the stability of the public, resorted to the dishonorable tactic of corrupting the military discipline that made them formidable to both their subjects and their enemies; the strength of military governance weakened and eventually fell apart due to Constantine's selective reforms, and the Roman world was inundated by waves of Barbarians.
The decay of Rome has been frequently ascribed to the translation of the seat of empire; but this History has already shown, that the powers of government were divided, rather than removed. The throne of Constantinople was erected in the East; while the West was still possessed by a series of emperors who held their residence in Italy, and claimed their equal inheritance of the legions and provinces. This dangerous novelty impaired the strength, and fomented the vices, of a double reign: the instruments of an oppressive and arbitrary system were multiplied; and a vain emulation of luxury, not of merit, was introduced and supported between the degenerate successors of Theodosius. Extreme distress, which unites the virtue of a free people, imbitters the factions of a declining monarchy. The hostile favorites of Arcadius and Honorius betrayed the republic to its common enemies; and the Byzantine court beheld with indifference, perhaps with pleasure, the disgrace of Rome, the misfortunes of Italy, and the loss of the West. Under the succeeding reigns, the alliance of the two empires was restored; but the aid of the Oriental Romans was tardy, doubtful, and ineffectual; and the national schism of the Greeks and Latins was enlarged by the perpetual difference of language and manners, of interests, and even of religion. Yet the salutary event approved in some measure the judgment of Constantine. During a long period of decay, his impregnable city repelled the victorious armies of Barbarians, protected the wealth of Asia, and commanded, both in peace and war, the important straits which connect the Euxine and Mediterranean Seas. The foundation of Constantinople more essentially contributed to the preservation of the East, than to the ruin of the West.
The decline of Rome is often blamed on the shift of the seat of power, but this History has already shown that the powers of government were divided, not removed. The throne in Constantinople was established in the East, while the West was still ruled by a series of emperors residing in Italy, who claimed their equal share of the legions and provinces. This risky change weakened the strength and fueled the vices of a dual reign: the tools of an oppressive and arbitrary system were multiplied, and a superficial competition for luxury, rather than for merit, emerged and thrived among the degenerate successors of Theodosius. Severe hardship, which unites the virtues of a free people, intensifies the conflicts in a failing monarchy. The rival supporters of Arcadius and Honorius sold out the republic to its common enemies, and the Byzantine court looked on with indifference, perhaps even pleasure, at the disgrace of Rome, the suffering of Italy, and the loss of the West. In the following reigns, the connection between the two empires was restored; however, the help from the Eastern Romans was slow, uncertain, and ineffective, and the national divide between Greeks and Latins grew wider due to the persistent differences in language, customs, interests, and even religion. Still, the positive outcome somewhat validated Constantine’s judgment. During a long period of decline, his impregnable city defended against the invading Barbarian armies, safeguarded the wealth of Asia, and controlled both in peace and war the crucial straits connecting the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. The establishment of Constantinople contributed more to the preservation of the East than to the downfall of the West.
As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear without surprise or scandal, that the introduction or at least the abuse, of Christianity had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman empire. The clergy successfully preached the doctrines of patience and pusillanimity: the active virtues of society were discouraged; and the last remains of military spirit were buried in the cloister: a large portion of public and private wealth was consecrated to the specious demands of charity and devotion; and the soldiers' pay was lavished on the useless multitudes of both sexes, who could only plead the merits of abstinence and chastity. Faith, zeal, curiosity, and the more earthly passions of malice and ambition, kindled the flame of theological discord; the church, and even the state, were distracted by religious factions, whose conflicts were sometimes bloody, and always implacable; the attention of the emperors was diverted from camps to synods; the Roman world was oppressed by a new species of tyranny; and the persecuted sects became the secret enemies of their country. Yet party spirit, however pernicious or absurd, is a principle of union as well as of dissension. The bishops, from eighteen hundred pulpits, inculcated the duty of passive obedience to a lawful and orthodox sovereign; their frequent assemblies, and perpetual correspondence, maintained the communion of distant churches; and the benevolent temper of the gospel was strengthened, though confined, by the spiritual alliance of the Catholics. The sacred indolence of the monks was devoutly embraced by a servile and effeminate age; but if superstition had not afforded a decent retreat, the same vices would have tempted the unworthy Romans to desert, from baser motives, the standard of the republic. Religious precepts are easily obeyed, which indulge and sanctify the natural inclinations of their votaries; but the pure and genuine influence of Christianity may be traced in its beneficial, though imperfect, effects on the Barbarian proselytes of the North. If the decline of the Roman empire was hastened by the conversion of Constantine, his victorious religion broke the violence of the fall, and mollified the ferocious temper of the conquerors.
As the happiness of a future life is the main focus of religion, we shouldn’t be surprised to hear that the rise or at least the misuse of Christianity played a role in the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. The clergy effectively preached the ideas of patience and meekness: the active virtues of society were discouraged; and the last traces of military spirit were lost in monasteries. A significant portion of public and private wealth was dedicated to the seemingly noble causes of charity and devotion, while soldiers' pay was wasted on the countless useless people of both genders, who could only argue for the merits of abstinence and chastity. Faith, zeal, curiosity, and the more worldly passions of malice and ambition ignited the fires of theological conflict. The church and even the state were troubled by religious factions, whose disputes were sometimes violent and always unyielding; the emperors’ focus shifted from military camps to church councils; the Roman world faced a new kind of tyranny; and the persecuted sects became covert enemies of their own country. Yet, party spirit, no matter how harmful or ridiculous, is a force for both unity and division. Bishops, from eighteen hundred pulpits, taught the importance of passive obedience to a lawful and orthodox ruler; their frequent gatherings and ongoing communication maintained the unity of distant churches; and the generous spirit of the gospel was reinforced, although limited, by the spiritual connection among Catholics. The sacred laziness of monks was eagerly accepted by a submissive and effeminate age; but if superstition had not provided a respectable refuge, the same flaws would have led the unworthy Romans to abandon, for base reasons, the ideals of the republic. Religious teachings are easy to follow when they support and justify the natural desires of their followers; however, the true and genuine impact of Christianity can be seen in its positive, though imperfect, effects on the Barbarian converts from the North. If the decline of the Roman Empire was accelerated by Constantine's conversion, his triumphant religion softened the blow of its fall and tempered the fierce nature of the conquerors.
This awful revolution may be usefully applied to the instruction of the present age. It is the duty of a patriot to prefer and promote the exclusive interest and glory of his native country: but a philosopher may be permitted to enlarge his views, and to consider Europe as one great republic whose various inhabitants have obtained almost the same level of politeness and cultivation. The balance of power will continue to fluctuate, and the prosperity of our own, or the neighboring kingdoms, may be alternately exalted or depressed; but these partial events cannot essentially injure our general state of happiness, the system of arts, and laws, and manners, which so advantageously distinguish, above the rest of mankind, the Europeans and their colonies. The savage nations of the globe are the common enemies of civilized society; and we may inquire, with anxious curiosity, whether Europe is still threatened with a repetition of those calamities, which formerly oppressed the arms and institutions of Rome. Perhaps the same reflections will illustrate the fall of that mighty empire, and explain the probable causes of our actual security.
This terrible revolution can be usefully applied to the education of the current age. It’s the duty of a patriot to prioritize and promote the unique interests and glory of their homeland; however, a philosopher might be allowed to broaden their perspective and view Europe as one large republic, where its various inhabitants have reached nearly the same level of politeness and culture. The balance of power will continue to shift, and the prosperity of our own or neighboring kingdoms may alternately rise or fall; but these specific events cannot fundamentally harm our overall happiness, or the system of arts, laws, and customs that set Europeans and their colonies apart from the rest of humanity. The wild nations of the world are the common enemies of civilized society; and we might wonder, with eager curiosity, whether Europe is still at risk of experiencing the same disasters that once plagued the arms and institutions of Rome. Perhaps the same thoughts will shed light on the fall of that great empire and clarify the likely causes of our current security.
I. The Romans were ignorant of the extent of their danger, and the number of their enemies. Beyond the Rhine and Danube, the Northern countries of Europe and Asia were filled with innumerable tribes of hunters and shepherds, poor, voracious, and turbulent; bold in arms, and impatient to ravish the fruits of industry. The Barbarian world was agitated by the rapid impulse of war; and the peace of Gaul or Italy was shaken by the distant revolutions of China. The Huns, who fled before a victorious enemy, directed their march towards the West; and the torrent was swelled by the gradual accession of captives and allies. The flying tribes who yielded to the Huns assumed in their turn the spirit of conquest; the endless column of Barbarians pressed on the Roman empire with accumulated weight; and, if the foremost were destroyed, the vacant space was instantly replenished by new assailants. Such formidable emigrations can no longer issue from the North; and the long repose, which has been imputed to the decrease of population, is the happy consequence of the progress of arts and agriculture. Instead of some rude villages, thinly scattered among its woods and morasses, Germany now produces a list of two thousand three hundred walled towns: the Christian kingdoms of Denmark, Sweden, and Poland, have been successively established; and the Hanse merchants, with the Teutonic knights, have extended their colonies along the coast of the Baltic, as far as the Gulf of Finland. From the Gulf of Finland to the Eastern Ocean, Russia now assumes the form of a powerful and civilized empire. The plough, the loom, and the forge, are introduced on the banks of the Volga, the Oby, and the Lena; and the fiercest of the Tartar hordes have been taught to tremble and obey. The reign of independent Barbarism is now contracted to a narrow span; and the remnant of Calmucks or Uzbecks, whose forces may be almost numbered, cannot seriously excite the apprehensions of the great republic of Europe. Yet this apparent security should not tempt us to forget, that new enemies, and unknown dangers, may possibly arise from some obscure people, scarcely visible in the map of the world, The Arabs or Saracens, who spread their conquests from India to Spain, had languished in poverty and contempt, till Mahomet breathed into those savage bodies the soul of enthusiasm.
I. The Romans were unaware of how serious their situation was and the number of enemies they faced. Beyond the Rhine and Danube, the northern regions of Europe and Asia were home to countless tribes of hunters and shepherds, who were poor, greedy, and restless; bold in battle, and eager to take the fruits of hard work. The Barbarian world was stirred up by the swift momentum of war; and the peace of Gaul or Italy was shaken by distant upheavals in China. The Huns, who were fleeing from a victorious enemy, moved westward; and their numbers grew with the addition of captives and allies. The fleeing tribes who submitted to the Huns took on a spirit of conquest themselves; the endless stream of Barbarians pushed against the Roman Empire with accumulating force; and if the front line was defeated, new attackers quickly filled the gap. Such massive migrations can no longer emerge from the North; and the long period of peace, which has been attributed to a declining population, is a fortunate result of advances in arts and agriculture. Instead of a few rough villages scattered across its forests and swamps, Germany now boasts a list of two thousand three hundred fortified towns: the Christian kingdoms of Denmark, Sweden, and Poland have been established in succession; and the Hanse merchants, along with the Teutonic knights, have expanded their colonies along the Baltic Sea, all the way to the Gulf of Finland. From the Gulf of Finland to the Eastern Ocean, Russia now takes the shape of a powerful and civilized empire. The plow, the loom, and the forge have been introduced along the banks of the Volga, the Oby, and the Lena; and the fiercest of the Tartar hordes have been made to tremble and obey. The era of independent Barbarism is now limited to a narrow span; and the remaining Calmucks or Uzbecks, whose numbers are minimal, can hardly pose a serious threat to the great republic of Europe. Yet this apparent security should not lead us to forget that new enemies and unknown dangers may possibly come from some obscure peoples, barely noticeable on the map of the world. The Arabs or Saracens, who spread their conquests from India to Spain, had languished in poverty and scorn until Mahomet infused those savage bodies with a spirit of enthusiasm.
II. The empire of Rome was firmly established by the singular and perfect coalition of its members. The subject nations, resigning the hope, and even the wish, of independence, embraced the character of Roman citizens; and the provinces of the West were reluctantly torn by the Barbarians from the bosom of their mother country. But this union was purchased by the loss of national freedom and military spirit; and the servile provinces, destitute of life and motion, expected their safety from the mercenary troops and governors, who were directed by the orders of a distant court. The happiness of a hundred millions depended on the personal merit of one or two men, perhaps children, whose minds were corrupted by education, luxury, and despotic power. The deepest wounds were inflicted on the empire during the minorities of the sons and grandsons of Theodosius; and, after those incapable princes seemed to attain the age of manhood, they abandoned the church to the bishops, the state to the eunuchs, and the provinces to the Barbarians. Europe is now divided into twelve powerful, though unequal kingdoms, three respectable commonwealths, and a variety of smaller, though independent, states: the chances of royal and ministerial talents are multiplied, at least, with the number of its rulers; and a Julian, or Semiramis, may reign in the North, while Arcadius and Honorius again slumber on the thrones of the South. The abuses of tyranny are restrained by the mutual influence of fear and shame; republics have acquired order and stability; monarchies have imbibed the principles of freedom, or, at least, of moderation; and some sense of honor and justice is introduced into the most defective constitutions by the general manners of the times. In peace, the progress of knowledge and industry is accelerated by the emulation of so many active rivals: in war, the European forces are exercised by temperate and undecisive contests. If a savage conqueror should issue from the deserts of Tartary, he must repeatedly vanquish the robust peasants of Russia, the numerous armies of Germany, the gallant nobles of France, and the intrepid freemen of Britain; who, perhaps, might confederate for their common defence. Should the victorious Barbarians carry slavery and desolation as far as the Atlantic Ocean, ten thousand vessels would transport beyond their pursuit the remains of civilized society; and Europe would revive and flourish in the American world, which is already filled with her colonies and institutions.
II. The Roman Empire was firmly built on a strong and perfect alliance among its members. The subject nations, giving up their hopes and even desires for independence, took on the identity of Roman citizens; and the provinces in the West were reluctantly torn away by the Barbarians from their home country. However, this unity came at the cost of national freedom and military spirit; the oppressed provinces, lacking vitality and movement, relied on mercenary troops and governors who followed orders from a distant court for their protection. The well-being of a hundred million people depended on the personal qualities of one or two individuals, often children, whose minds were tainted by education, luxury, and tyrannical power. The worst damage to the empire occurred during the youth of the sons and grandsons of Theodosius; and, once those unfit rulers seemed to reach adulthood, they left the church to the bishops, the government to the eunuchs, and the provinces to the Barbarians. Europe is now split into twelve powerful, although unequal, kingdoms, three respected republics, and a variety of smaller, independent states: the odds of royal and ministerial talent are multiplied, at least, by the number of its rulers; and a Julian or Semiramis might rule in the North, while Arcadius and Honorius again doze on the thrones of the South. The abuses of tyranny are kept in check by the mutual influences of fear and shame; republics have gained order and stability; monarchies have absorbed the principles of freedom, or at least, of moderation; and some sense of honor and justice has made its way into the most flawed constitutions through the general attitudes of the time. In peace, the advancement of knowledge and industry is sped up by the competition of many diligent rivals: in war, European forces train through measured and indecisive battles. If a savage conqueror were to emerge from the deserts of Tartary, he would have to repeatedly defeat the strong peasants of Russia, the vast armies of Germany, the brave nobles of France, and the fearless free people of Britain; who might, perhaps, band together for their shared defense. Should the victorious Barbarians bring slavery and ruin all the way to the Atlantic Ocean, countless ships would carry the remnants of civilized society beyond their reach; and Europe would revive and thrive in the Americas, which are already filled with her colonies and institutions.
III. Cold, poverty, and a life of danger and fatigue, fortify the strength and courage of Barbarians. In every age they have oppressed the polite and peaceful nations of China, India, and Persia, who neglected, and still neglect, to counterbalance these natural powers by the resources of military art. The warlike states of antiquity, Greece, Macedonia, and Rome, educated a race of soldiers; exercised their bodies, disciplined their courage, multiplied their forces by regular evolutions, and converted the iron, which they possessed, into strong and serviceable weapons. But this superiority insensibly declined with their laws and manners; and the feeble policy of Constantine and his successors armed and instructed, for the ruin of the empire, the rude valor of the Barbarian mercenaries. The military art has been changed by the invention of gunpowder; which enables man to command the two most powerful agents of nature, air and fire. Mathematics, chemistry, mechanics, architecture, have been applied to the service of war; and the adverse parties oppose to each other the most elaborate modes of attack and of defence. Historians may indignantly observe, that the preparations of a siege would found and maintain a flourishing colony; yet we cannot be displeased, that the subversion of a city should be a work of cost and difficulty; or that an industrious people should be protected by those arts, which survive and supply the decay of military virtue. Cannon and fortifications now form an impregnable barrier against the Tartar horse; and Europe is secure from any future irruption of Barbarians; since, before they can conquer, they must cease to be barbarous. Their gradual advances in the science of war would always be accompanied, as we may learn from the example of Russia, with a proportionable improvement in the arts of peace and civil policy; and they themselves must deserve a place among the polished nations whom they subdue.
III. Cold, poverty, and a life filled with danger and exhaustion strengthen the resolve and bravery of Barbarians. Throughout history, they have oppressed the civilized and peaceful nations of China, India, and Persia, who have ignored, and continue to ignore, the need to balance these natural strengths with military resources. The warlike states of ancient Greece, Macedonia, and Rome developed a strong warrior class; they trained their bodies, disciplined their courage, organized their forces through structured formations, and transformed the iron they had into powerful and effective weapons. However, this advantage gradually diminished along with their laws and customs, and the weak policies of Constantine and his successors equipped the brutal bravery of Barbarian mercenaries for the empire's downfall. The art of warfare has transformed with the invention of gunpowder, allowing humans to dominate the two most powerful forces of nature: air and fire. Mathematics, chemistry, mechanics, and architecture have all been utilized for military purposes, with opposing sides employing increasingly complex strategies for attack and defense. Historians may exclaim that the resources needed for a siege could establish and sustain a thriving colony; yet, it’s only reasonable that demolishing a city should be a costly and challenging endeavor, or that a hardworking people should be safeguarded by the skills that endure and compensate for the decline of military strength. Cannons and fortifications now create a strong defense against the Tartar cavalry, and Europe is safe from any future invasions by Barbarians; they must experience a transformation from barbarism before they can conquer. Their gradual advancements in military strategy would always be paired, as seen in Russia's case, with a corresponding improvement in the arts of peace and governance; and they themselves would need to earn a place among the refined nations they seek to conquer.
Should these speculations be found doubtful or fallacious, there still remains a more humble source of comfort and hope. The discoveries of ancient and modern navigators, and the domestic history, or tradition, of the most enlightened nations, represent the human savage, naked both in body and mind and destitute of laws, of arts, of ideas, and almost of language. From this abject condition, perhaps the primitive and universal state of man, he has gradually arisen to command the animals, to fertilize the earth, to traverse the ocean and to measure the heavens. His progress in the improvement and exercise of his mental and corporeal faculties has been irregular and various; infinitely slow in the beginning, and increasing by degrees with redoubled velocity: ages of laborious ascent have been followed by a moment of rapid downfall; and the several climates of the globe have felt the vicissitudes of light and darkness. Yet the experience of four thousand years should enlarge our hopes, and diminish our apprehensions: we cannot determine to what height the human species may aspire in their advances towards perfection; but it may safely be presumed, that no people, unless the face of nature is changed, will relapse into their original barbarism. The improvements of society may be viewed under a threefold aspect. 1. The poet or philosopher illustrates his age and country by the efforts of a single mind; but those superior powers of reason or fancy are rare and spontaneous productions; and the genius of Homer, or Cicero, or Newton, would excite less admiration, if they could be created by the will of a prince, or the lessons of a preceptor. 2. The benefits of law and policy, of trade and manufactures, of arts and sciences, are more solid and permanent: and many individuals may be qualified, by education and discipline, to promote, in their respective stations, the interest of the community. But this general order is the effect of skill and labor; and the complex machinery may be decayed by time, or injured by violence. 3. Fortunately for mankind, the more useful, or, at least, more necessary arts, can be performed without superior talents, or national subordination: without the powers of one, or the union of many. Each village, each family, each individual, must always possess both ability and inclination to perpetuate the use of fire and of metals; the propagation and service of domestic animals; the methods of hunting and fishing; the rudiments of navigation; the imperfect cultivation of corn, or other nutritive grain; and the simple practice of the mechanic trades. Private genius and public industry may be extirpated; but these hardy plants survive the tempest, and strike an everlasting root into the most unfavorable soil. The splendid days of Augustus and Trajan were eclipsed by a cloud of ignorance; and the Barbarians subverted the laws and palaces of Rome. But the scythe, the invention or emblem of Saturn, still continued annually to mow the harvests of Italy; and the human feasts of the Læstrigons have never been renewed on the coast of Campania.
If these speculations turn out to be questionable or misleading, there is still a more modest source of comfort and hope. The findings of ancient and modern explorers, along with the domestic history or tradition of the most advanced nations, depict the human savage, stripped bare both physically and mentally, lacking laws, arts, ideas, and almost even language. From this miserable state, perhaps a fundamental and universal condition of humanity, he has gradually learned to master animals, cultivate the land, sail across the ocean, and explore the cosmos. His journey in developing and utilizing his mental and physical abilities has been uneven and diverse; it started out incredibly slow and has gradually increased in speed: long periods of hard struggle have been followed by brief moments of rapid decline; and various climates around the globe have experienced cycles of light and darkness. Yet, the experience of four thousand years should expand our hopes and reduce our fears: we cannot predict how far humanity can go in its quest for perfection; however, it is safe to assume that no community, unless the nature of the world is drastically altered, will revert to its original savagery. The advancements of society can be viewed in three ways. 1. A poet or philosopher illustrates his era and culture through the work of a single mind; but those exceptional talents of reasoning or imagination are rare and spontaneous occurrences; the genius of Homer, Cicero, or Newton would inspire less awe if they could be produced at the behest of a ruler or the teachings of a teacher. 2. The advantages of laws and policies, trade and manufacturing, arts and sciences, are more substantial and enduring: many individuals can be trained, through education and discipline, to contribute positively to the community in their respective roles. However, this overall order results from skill and hard work; and the intricate systems may wear down over time or be damaged by conflict. 3. Thankfully for humanity, the more useful, or at least more essential, arts can be performed without exceptional talents or national hierarchy: without the abilities of one or the cooperation of many. Every village, family, and individual must always have both the skills and the willingness to sustain the use of fire and metallurgy; the breeding and care of domestic animals; methods of hunting and fishing; the basics of navigation; the rudimentary farming of grain or other food staples; and the simple practice of practical trades. Individual brilliance and public effort can fade away; but these resilient practices survive storms and take deep root even in the most challenging environments. The glorious days of Augustus and Trajan were overshadowed by a veil of ignorance; and the Barbarians dismantled the laws and structures of Rome. Yet, the scythe, the invention or symbol of Saturn, continued to reap the harvests of Italy every year; and the grand feasts of the Læstrigons have never been repeated on the coast of Campania.
Since the first discovery of the arts, war, commerce, and religious zeal have diffused, among the savages of the Old and New World, these inestimable gifts: they have been successively propagated; they can never be lost. We may therefore acquiesce in the pleasing conclusion, that every age of the world has increased, and still increases, the real wealth, the happiness, the knowledge, and perhaps the virtue, of the human race.
Since the first discovery of the arts, war, trade, and religious passion have spread these priceless gifts among the peoples of the Old and New Worlds: they have been passed down through generations; they can never be lost. We can, therefore, accept the comforting conclusion that every age of the world has contributed to, and continues to contribute to, the actual wealth, happiness, knowledge, and possibly the virtue, of humanity.
End of Vol. 3
End of Volume 3
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!