This is a modern-English version of United States Presidents' Inaugural Speeches: From Washington to George W. Bush, originally written by United States. Presidents. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.





INAUGURAL ADDRESSES OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES



FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON TO GEORGE W. BUSH

1789-2005










CONTENTS


GEORGE WASHINGTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE WASHINGTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN ADAMS INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THOMAS JEFFERSON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THOMAS JEFFERSON SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MADISON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MADISON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MONROE FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MONROE, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ANDREW JACKSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ANDREW JACKSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MARTIN VAN BUREN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES KNOX POLK, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ZACHARY TAYLOR, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN PIERCE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES BUCHANAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ABRAHAM LINCOLN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ABRAHAM LINCOLN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ULYSSES S. GRANT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ULYSSES S. GRANT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RUTHERFORD B. HAYES, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES A. GARFIELD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GROVER CLEVELAND, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

BENJAMIN HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GROVER CLEVELAND, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM MCKINLEY FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM MCKINLEY, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THEODORE ROOSEVELT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WOODROW WILSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WOODROW WILSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WARREN G. HARDING, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

CALVIN COOLIDGE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

HERBERT HOOVER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, THIRD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FOURTH INAUGURAL ADDRESS

HARRY S. TRUMAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN F. KENNEDY, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JIMMY CARTER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RONALD REAGAN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RONALD REAGAN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE BUSH, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE W. BUSH, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE W. BUSH, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

NOTES—PRESIDENTS WHO WERE NOT INAUGURATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS


GEORGE WASHINGTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE WASHINGTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN ADAMS INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THOMAS JEFFERSON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THOMAS JEFFERSON SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MADISON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MADISON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MONROE FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES MONROE, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ANDREW JACKSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ANDREW JACKSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MARTIN VAN BUREN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES KNOX POLK, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ZACHARY TAYLOR, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN PIERCE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES BUCHANAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ABRAHAM LINCOLN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ABRAHAM LINCOLN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ULYSSES S. GRANT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

ULYSSES S. GRANT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RUTHERFORD B. HAYES, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JAMES A. GARFIELD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GROVER CLEVELAND, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

BENJAMIN HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GROVER CLEVELAND, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM MCKINLEY FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM MCKINLEY, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THEODORE ROOSEVELT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WOODROW WILSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WOODROW WILSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WARREN G. HARDING, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

CALVIN COOLIDGE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

HERBERT HOOVER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, THIRD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FOURTH INAUGURAL ADDRESS

HARRY S. TRUMAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JOHN F. KENNEDY, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JIMMY CARTER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RONALD REAGAN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

RONALD REAGAN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE BUSH, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE W. BUSH, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

GEORGE W. BUSH, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

NOTES—PRESIDENTS WHO WERE NOT INAUGURATED










GEORGE WASHINGTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK THURSDAY, APRIL 30, 1789

[Transcriber's note: The Nation's first chief executive took his oath of office in April in New York City on the balcony of the Senate Chamber at Federal Hall on Wall Street. General Washington had been unanimously elected President by the first electoral college, and John Adams was elected Vice President because he received the second greatest number of votes. Under the rules, each elector cast two votes. The Chancellor of New York and fellow Freemason, Robert R. Livingston administered the oath of office. The Bible on which the oath was sworn belonged to New York's St. John's Masonic Lodge. The new President gave his inaugural address before a joint session of the two Houses of Congress assembled inside the Senate Chamber.]

[Transcriber's note: The nation's first president took his oath of office in April in New York City on the balcony of the Senate Chamber at Federal Hall on Wall Street. General Washington was unanimously elected President by the first electoral college, and John Adams became Vice President because he received the second highest number of votes. According to the rules, each elector cast two votes. The Chancellor of New York and fellow Freemason, Robert R. Livingston, administered the oath of office. The Bible on which the oath was sworn belonged to New York's St. John's Masonic Lodge. The new President delivered his inaugural address before a joint session of the two Houses of Congress gathered inside the Senate Chamber.]


Fellow-Citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives:

Fellow Citizens of the Senate and the House of Representatives:

Among the vicissitudes incident to life no event could have filled me with greater anxieties than that of which the notification was transmitted by your order, and received on the 14th day of the present month. On the one hand, I was summoned by my Country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years—a retreat which was rendered every day more necessary as well as more dear to me by the addition of habit to inclination, and of frequent interruptions in my health to the gradual waste committed on it by time. On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence one who (inheriting inferior endowments from nature and unpracticed in the duties of civil administration) ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies. In this conflict of emotions all I dare aver is that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be affected. All I dare hope is that if, in executing this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, and have thence too little consulted my incapacity as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me, my error will be palliated by the motives which mislead me, and its consequences be judged by my country with some share of the partiality in which they originated.

Among the ups and downs of life, nothing has caused me more anxiety than the news you sent me, which I received on the 14th of this month. On one hand, I was called by my country, whose voice I always hear with respect and love, from a retreat that I had chosen with great affection and, in my hopeful mind, as a permanent sanctuary for my later years—a retreat that became more essential and dear to me each day, thanks to habit and my health’s gradual decline due to time. On the other hand, the size and complexity of the responsibility that my country called me to take on would naturally cause even the wisest and most experienced citizens to question their own qualifications, and it overwhelmed me, who, having inherited lesser natural abilities and lacking experience in civil duties, should be particularly aware of my own shortcomings. In this turmoil of feelings, all I can say is that I have genuinely tried to determine my duty based on a careful consideration of all the factors that could influence it. All I can hope is that if, in carrying out this responsibility, I have been too influenced by a grateful remembrance of past experiences or by a deep emotional response to this extraordinary show of trust from my fellow citizens, and have thus paid too little attention to my unpreparedness and reluctance for the serious and new responsibilities ahead, my mistake will be forgiven due to the intentions that guided me, and its outcomes will be judged by my country with some understanding of the feelings from which they arose.

Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence.

Given the impressions that have led me, in response to the public call, to this position, it would be especially inappropriate to skip my heartfelt prayers to that Almighty Being who governs the universe, who guides the affairs of nations, and whose providential support can address every human shortcoming. I ask for His blessing to sanctify a Government created by the people of the United States for their liberties and happiness, and to empower everyone involved in its administration to successfully fulfill their responsibilities. By offering this tribute to the Great Author of every public and private good, I believe it reflects your feelings as much as my own, and those of my fellow citizens as well. No people are more obligated to recognize and revere the Invisible Hand that directs human affairs than those of the United States. Every step they have taken toward becoming an independent nation seems marked by some sign of divine intervention; and in the significant change just made to their united government, the thoughtful discussions and voluntary agreement of so many distinct communities involved cannot be compared to the methods by which most governments have been formed, without eliciting a sincere sense of gratitude and a humble expectation of the future blessings that the past seems to promise. These thoughts, prompted by the current situation, have made themselves too compelling in my mind to ignore. I hope you will agree with me that there are no sentiments under which the actions of a new and free government could begin more favorably.

By the article establishing the executive department it is made the duty of the President "to recommend to your consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." The circumstances under which I now meet you will acquit me from entering into that subject further than to refer to the great constitutional charter under which you are assembled, and which, in defining your powers, designates the objects to which your attention is to be given. It will be more consistent with those circumstances, and far more congenial with the feelings which actuate me, to substitute, in place of a recommendation of particular measures, the tribute that is due to the talents, the rectitude, and the patriotism which adorn the characters selected to devise and adopt them. In these honorable qualifications I behold the surest pledges that as on one side no local prejudices or attachments, no separate views nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great assemblage of communities and interests, so, on another, that the foundation of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens and command the respect of the world. I dwell on this prospect with every satisfaction which an ardent love for my country can inspire, since there is no truth more thoroughly established than that there exists in the economy and course of nature an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness; between duty and advantage; between the genuine maxims of an honest and magnanimous policy and the solid rewards of public prosperity and felicity; since we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained; and since the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered, perhaps, as deeply, as finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

By the article that establishes the executive department, it is the President's duty "to recommend to your consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." Given the circumstances in which I now meet you, I will refrain from discussing that topic any further than to point out the great constitutional charter under which you are gathered, which specifies your powers and the issues that require your attention. It's more appropriate, considering the circumstances, and aligns better with my sentiments, to offer tribute to the talents, integrity, and patriotism of those chosen to develop and implement those measures instead of suggesting specific policies. In these honorable qualities, I see the strongest assurances that, on one hand, local prejudices or attachments, separate interests, and party conflicts will not skew the broad, impartial perspective needed to oversee this significant gathering of communities and interests. On the other hand, I believe that the foundation of our national policies will be built on the unwavering principles of personal ethics, and the superiority of free government will be demonstrated through all the qualities that can earn the love of its citizens and respect from the world. I contemplate this future with the satisfaction born from a deep love for my country, as there is no greater truth than the undeniable connection between virtue and happiness; between obligation and benefit; between the true principles of an honest and noble policy and the tangible rewards of public growth and happiness. We should also trust that we cannot expect the favorable blessings of Heaven on a nation that ignores the eternal rules of order and right that Heaven itself has established; and since the safeguarding of the cherished flame of liberty and the fate of the republican government model are rightly seen as deeply, if not finally, dependent on the experiment placed in the hands of the American people.

Besides the ordinary objects submitted to your care, it will remain with your judgment to decide how far an exercise of the occasional power delegated by the fifth article of the Constitution is rendered expedient at the present juncture by the nature of objections which have been urged against the system, or by the degree of inquietude which has given birth to them. Instead of undertaking particular recommendations on this subject, in which I could be guided by no lights derived from official opportunities, I shall again give way to my entire confidence in your discernment and pursuit of the public good; for I assure myself that whilst you carefully avoid every alteration which might endanger the benefits of an united and effective government, or which ought to await the future lessons of experience, a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony will sufficiently influence your deliberations on the question how far the former can be impregnably fortified or the latter be safely and advantageously promoted.

Along with the regular items under your care, it will be up to your judgment to determine how necessary it is to use the occasional power granted by the fifth article of the Constitution at this moment, considering the nature of the objections raised against the system and the level of unrest that prompted them. Instead of making specific recommendations on this matter, which I have no official insight into, I will once again place my full trust in your ability to discern what is best for the public good. I am confident that while you carefully avoid any changes that could threaten the advantages of a united and effective government or should wait for future lessons learned from experience, your respect for the fundamental rights of free individuals and your concern for public harmony will significantly guide your decision-making on how to strengthen the former or safely and beneficially promote the latter.

To the foregoing observations I have one to add, which will be most properly addressed to the House of Representatives. It concerns myself, and will therefore be as brief as possible. When I was first honored with a call into the service of my country, then on the eve of an arduous struggle for its liberties, the light in which I contemplated my duty required that I should renounce every pecuniary compensation. From this resolution I have in no instance departed; and being still under the impressions which produced it, I must decline as inapplicable to myself any share in the personal emoluments which may be indispensably included in a permanent provision for the executive department, and must accordingly pray that the pecuniary estimates for the station in which I am placed may during my continuance in it be limited to such actual expenditures as the public good may be thought to require.

To the previous points, I have one more to add, which is best directed to the House of Representatives. It concerns me, so I’ll keep it as brief as possible. When I was first honored to serve my country, right before a challenging fight for its freedoms, my understanding of my duty made it clear that I should give up any financial compensation. I have never strayed from this decision, and still feeling that way, I must decline any personal benefits that might be necessary for a permanent budget for the executive branch. Therefore, I ask that the financial estimates for my position be restricted to only the actual expenses deemed essential for the public good during my time in this role.

Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend.

Having shared my feelings that this occasion has inspired in me, I will now take my leave; but not without once again turning to the kind Creator of Humanity in humble prayer, asking that since He has been generous enough to provide the American people with the chance to discuss matters in complete calmness and with a remarkable agreement on a form of government to secure their unity and promote their happiness, may His divine blessing also be evident in the broad perspectives, thoughtful discussions, and wise actions that are essential for the success of this Government.






GEORGE WASHINGTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

IN THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1793

[Transcriber's note: President Washington's second oath of office was taken in the Senate Chamber of Congress Hall in Philadelphia on March 4, the date fixed by the Continental Congress for inaugurations. Before an assembly of Congressmen, Cabinet officers, judges of the federal and district courts, foreign officials, and a small gathering of Philadelphians, the President offered the shortest inaugural address ever given. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court William Cushing administered the oath of office.]

[Transcriber's note: President Washington's second oath of office was taken in the Senate Chamber of Congress Hall in Philadelphia on March 4, the date set by the Continental Congress for inaugurations. In front of an assembly of Congress members, Cabinet officials, judges from federal and district courts, foreign dignitaries, and a small group of Philadelphians, the President delivered the shortest inaugural speech ever given. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court William Cushing administered the oath of office.]


Fellow Citizens:

Fellow Citizens:

I am again called upon by the voice of my country to execute the functions of its Chief Magistrate. When the occasion proper for it shall arrive, I shall endeavor to express the high sense I entertain of this distinguished honor, and of the confidence which has been reposed in me by the people of united America.

I am once again called upon by the voice of my country to carry out the duties of its Chief Magistrate. When the appropriate time comes, I will do my best to convey how deeply honored I am by this recognition and by the trust placed in me by the people of the united America.

Previous to the execution of any official act of the President the Constitution requires an oath of office. This oath I am now about to take, and in your presence: That if it shall be found during my administration of the Government I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.

Before the President can officially act, the Constitution requires an oath of office. I am about to take that oath in front of you: That if it is found during my time in office that I have willingly or knowingly violated any of its guidelines, I may face constitutional consequences and the criticism of everyone present at this solemn ceremony.






JOHN ADAMS INAUGURAL ADDRESS

IN THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1797

[Transcriber's note: The first Vice President became the second President of the United States. His opponent in the election, Thomas Jefferson, had won the second greatest number of electoral votes and therefore had been elected Vice President by the electoral college. Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth administered the oath of office in the Hall of the House of Representatives in Federal Hall before a joint session of Congress.]

[Transcriber's note: The first Vice President became the second President of the United States. His opponent in the election, Thomas Jefferson, received the second highest number of electoral votes and was therefore elected Vice President by the electoral college. Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth swore him in during a joint session of Congress in the Hall of the House of Representatives at Federal Hall.]


When it was first perceived, in early times, that no middle course for America remained between unlimited submission to a foreign legislature and a total independence of its claims, men of reflection were less apprehensive of danger from the formidable power of fleets and armies they must determine to resist than from those contests and dissensions which would certainly arise concerning the forms of government to be instituted over the whole and over the parts of this extensive country. Relying, however, on the purity of their intentions, the justice of their cause, and the integrity and intelligence of the people, under an overruling Providence which had so signally protected this country from the first, the representatives of this nation, then consisting of little more than half its present number, not only broke to pieces the chains which were forging and the rod of iron that was lifted up, but frankly cut asunder the ties which had bound them, and launched into an ocean of uncertainty.

When people first realized that America faced no viable option between total submission to a foreign government and complete independence, thoughtful individuals were more worried about potential conflicts and disagreements over the type of government to establish across this vast country than they were about the strong military power they had to resist. They trusted in their good intentions, the righteousness of their cause, and the integrity and intelligence of the people, under a higher power that had watched over this nation since its beginning. The representatives of this nation, which was then only a little more than half its current size, not only shattered the chains that were being forged and the threat of oppression but also boldly severed the ties that had connected them, stepping into a sea of uncertainty.

The zeal and ardor of the people during the Revolutionary war, supplying the place of government, commanded a degree of order sufficient at least for the temporary preservation of society. The Confederation which was early felt to be necessary was prepared from the models of the Batavian and Helvetic confederacies, the only examples which remain with any detail and precision in history, and certainly the only ones which the people at large had ever considered. But reflecting on the striking difference in so many particulars between this country and those where a courier may go from the seat of government to the frontier in a single day, it was then certainly foreseen by some who assisted in Congress at the formation of it that it could not be durable.

The passion and commitment of the people during the Revolutionary War effectively took the place of government, creating enough order for the temporary stability of society. The Confederation, which was recognized as necessary early on, was modeled after the Batavian and Helvetic confederacies, the only examples with significant detail and precision in history, and certainly the only ones that most people had ever considered. However, considering the significant differences in many aspects between this country and those where a courier can travel from the government seat to the frontier in just a day, it was clear to some who were involved in Congress during its formation that it couldn't last.

Negligence of its regulations, inattention to its recommendations, if not disobedience to its authority, not only in individuals but in States, soon appeared with their melancholy consequences—universal languor, jealousies and rivalries of States, decline of navigation and commerce, discouragement of necessary manufactures, universal fall in the value of lands and their produce, contempt of public and private faith, loss of consideration and credit with foreign nations, and at length in discontents, animosities, combinations, partial conventions, and insurrection, threatening some great national calamity.

Neglect of its rules, lack of attention to its recommendations, and even defiance of its authority—seen not just in individuals but also in States—quickly led to unfortunate outcomes: widespread weakness, jealousy and rivalries among States, a decline in navigation and trade, a lack of support for essential manufacturing, a general drop in the value of land and its products, a disregard for public and private trust, a loss of respect and credibility with other nations, and ultimately discontent, animosity, alliances, partial agreements, and uprisings, all threatening a major national disaster.

In this dangerous crisis the people of America were not abandoned by their usual good sense, presence of mind, resolution, or integrity. Measures were pursued to concert a plan to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty. The public disquisitions, discussions, and deliberations issued in the present happy Constitution of Government.

In this tough time, the people of America didn’t lose their usual common sense, composure, determination, or honesty. Steps were taken to create a plan to form a better union, establish justice, ensure peace at home, provide for defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of freedom. The public debates, discussions, and reflections led to the current successful Constitution of Government.

Employed in the service of my country abroad during the whole course of these transactions, I first saw the Constitution of the United States in a foreign country. Irritated by no literary altercation, animated by no public debate, heated by no party animosity, I read it with great satisfaction, as the result of good heads prompted by good hearts, as an experiment better adapted to the genius, character, situation, and relations of this nation and country than any which had ever been proposed or suggested. In its general principles and great outlines it was conformable to such a system of government as I had ever most esteemed, and in some States, my own native State in particular, had contributed to establish. Claiming a right of suffrage, in common with my fellow-citizens, in the adoption or rejection of a constitution which was to rule me and my posterity, as well as them and theirs, I did not hesitate to express my approbation of it on all occasions, in public and in private. It was not then, nor has been since, any objection to it in my mind that the Executive and Senate were not more permanent. Nor have I ever entertained a thought of promoting any alteration in it but such as the people themselves, in the course of their experience, should see and feel to be necessary or expedient, and by their representatives in Congress and the State legislatures, according to the Constitution itself, adopt and ordain.

While serving my country overseas during these events, I first encountered the Constitution of the United States in another country. Without being bothered by any literary disputes, energized by no public arguments, or fueled by any party rivalry, I read it with great pleasure, seeing it as the result of brilliant minds inspired by good intentions—an experiment better suited to the nature, character, situation, and relationships of this nation than any other proposed or suggested before. In its fundamental principles and broad outlines, it aligned with the type of government I always valued, and in some states, especially my home state, I had helped establish. Claiming the right to vote, alongside my fellow citizens, on the adoption or rejection of a constitution that would govern not only me and my descendants but also them and theirs, I was always vocal about my support for it, both publicly and privately. At no point then, nor at any time since, have I had any objections regarding the Executive and Senate not being more permanent. Nor have I ever thought about pushing for any changes except those that the people, through their experiences, would recognize as necessary or advisable, which should then be adopted and established by their representatives in Congress and state legislatures, in accordance with the Constitution itself.

Returning to the bosom of my country after a painful separation from it for ten years, I had the honor to be elected to a station under the new order of things, and I have repeatedly laid myself under the most serious obligations to support the Constitution. The operation of it has equaled the most sanguine expectations of its friends, and from an habitual attention to it, satisfaction in its administration, and delight in its effects upon the peace, order, prosperity, and happiness of the nation I have acquired an habitual attachment to it and veneration for it.

Returning to my country after a painful ten-year separation, I had the honor of being elected to a position in the new order of things, and I have repeatedly committed myself to supporting the Constitution. Its implementation has met the highest hopes of its supporters, and through my constant attention to it, my satisfaction with its administration, and my joy in its impact on the peace, order, prosperity, and happiness of the nation, I have developed a deep attachment to it and respect for it.

What other form of government, indeed, can so well deserve our esteem and love?

What other type of government, really, deserves our respect and affection as much?

There may be little solidity in an ancient idea that congregations of men into cities and nations are the most pleasing objects in the sight of superior intelligences, but this is very certain, that to a benevolent human mind there can be no spectacle presented by any nation more pleasing, more noble, majestic, or august, than an assembly like that which has so often been seen in this and the other Chamber of Congress, of a Government in which the Executive authority, as well as that of all the branches of the Legislature, are exercised by citizens selected at regular periods by their neighbors to make and execute laws for the general good. Can anything essential, anything more than mere ornament and decoration, be added to this by robes and diamonds? Can authority be more amiable and respectable when it descends from accidents or institutions established in remote antiquity than when it springs fresh from the hearts and judgments of an honest and enlightened people? For it is the people only that are represented. It is their power and majesty that is reflected, and only for their good, in every legitimate government, under whatever form it may appear. The existence of such a government as ours for any length of time is a full proof of a general dissemination of knowledge and virtue throughout the whole body of the people. And what object or consideration more pleasing than this can be presented to the human mind? If national pride is ever justifiable or excusable it is when it springs, not from power or riches, grandeur or glory, but from conviction of national innocence, information, and benevolence.

There may not be much certainty in the ancient idea that groups of people in cities and nations are the most appealing sights to higher beings, but it is clear that to a kind-hearted person, nothing can be more beautiful, noble, majestic, or impressive than a gathering like the one frequently seen in this and the other Chamber of Congress, where a government is run by elected citizens chosen by their neighbors at regular intervals to create and enforce laws for the common good. Can anything truly significant, anything beyond mere decoration, be added to this with robes and diamonds? Can authority be more pleasant and respectable when it comes from ancient customs or institutions than when it comes directly from the hearts and minds of an honest and informed populace? Because it is only the people who are represented. Their power and dignity are reflected, and every legitimate government exists solely for their benefit, regardless of its form. The existence of a government like ours for any significant period is clear evidence of widespread knowledge and virtue among the people. And what could be a more pleasing idea than this? If national pride is ever justifiable or understandable, it is when it arises not from power or wealth, grandeur or fame, but from a belief in national innocence, knowledge, and kindness.

In the midst of these pleasing ideas we should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections. If an election is to be determined by a majority of a single vote, and that can be procured by a party through artifice or corruption, the Government may be the choice of a party for its own ends, not of the nation for the national good. If that solitary suffrage can be obtained by foreign nations by flattery or menaces, by fraud or violence, by terror, intrigue, or venality, the Government may not be the choice of the American people, but of foreign nations. It may be foreign nations who govern us, and not we, the people, who govern ourselves; and candid men will acknowledge that in such cases choice would have little advantage to boast of over lot or chance.

In the midst of these pleasant thoughts, we would be disloyal to ourselves if we ever overlooked the threat to our freedoms posed by anything biased or outside influence that might taint the integrity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections. If an election is decided by a majority of just one vote, and that can be secured by a party through trickery or corruption, the Government may end up being the choice of a party for its own purposes, rather than being chosen by the nation for the common good. If that one vote can be swayed by foreign nations through flattery or intimidation, fraud or violence, or through fear, manipulation, or bribery, then the Government may not represent the choice of the American people, but instead that of foreign nations. It could end up being foreign countries that govern us, rather than us, the people, governing ourselves; and honest individuals would agree that in such situations, making a choice would offer little more advantage than pure luck.

Such is the amiable and interesting system of government (and such are some of the abuses to which it may be exposed) which the people of America have exhibited to the admiration and anxiety of the wise and virtuous of all nations for eight years under the administration of a citizen who, by a long course of great actions, regulated by prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude, conducting a people inspired with the same virtues and animated with the same ardent patriotism and love of liberty to independence and peace, to increasing wealth and unexampled prosperity, has merited the gratitude of his fellow-citizens, commanded the highest praises of foreign nations, and secured immortal glory with posterity.

This is the friendly and engaging system of government (and these are some of the issues it might face) that the people of America have shown off to the admiration and concern of the wise and good from all nations for eight years under the leadership of a citizen who, through a long history of significant actions guided by wisdom, fairness, moderation, and courage, has led a nation filled with the same virtues and driven by the same passionate patriotism and love of freedom to independence and peace, to growing wealth and unparalleled prosperity, earning the appreciation of his fellow citizens, earning the highest praises from other nations, and securing lasting fame for the future.

In that retirement which is his voluntary choice may he long live to enjoy the delicious recollection of his services, the gratitude of mankind, the happy fruits of them to himself and the world, which are daily increasing, and that splendid prospect of the future fortunes of this country which is opening from year to year. His name may be still a rampart, and the knowledge that he lives a bulwark, against all open or secret enemies of his country's peace. This example has been recommended to the imitation of his successors by both Houses of Congress and by the voice of the legislatures and the people throughout the nation.

In his voluntary retirement, may he live long to enjoy the wonderful memories of his contributions, the gratitude of people, the positive outcomes for himself and the world that are growing every day, and the bright future for this country that unfolds year after year. His name may still serve as a shield, and the awareness that he is alive provides protection against all open or hidden threats to his country's peace. Both Houses of Congress, as well as the legislatures and the public across the nation, have encouraged his successors to follow this example.

On this subject it might become me better to be silent or to speak with diffidence; but as something may be expected, the occasion, I hope, will be admitted as an apology if I venture to say that if a preference, upon principle, of a free republican government, formed upon long and serious reflection, after a diligent and impartial inquiry after truth; if an attachment to the Constitution of the United States, and a conscientious determination to support it until it shall be altered by the judgments and wishes of the people, expressed in the mode prescribed in it; if a respectful attention to the constitutions of the individual States and a constant caution and delicacy toward the State governments; if an equal and impartial regard to the rights, interest, honor, and happiness of all the States in the Union, without preference or regard to a northern or southern, an eastern or western, position, their various political opinions on unessential points or their personal attachments; if a love of virtuous men of all parties and denominations; if a love of science and letters and a wish to patronize every rational effort to encourage schools, colleges, universities, academies, and every institution for propagating knowledge, virtue, and religion among all classes of the people, not only for their benign influence on the happiness of life in all its stages and classes, and of society in all its forms, but as the only means of preserving our Constitution from its natural enemies, the spirit of sophistry, the spirit of party, the spirit of intrigue, the profligacy of corruption, and the pestilence of foreign influence, which is the angel of destruction to elective governments; if a love of equal laws, of justice, and humanity in the interior administration; if an inclination to improve agriculture, commerce, and manufacturers for necessity, convenience, and defense; if a spirit of equity and humanity toward the aboriginal nations of America, and a disposition to meliorate their condition by inclining them to be more friendly to us, and our citizens to be more friendly to them; if an inflexible determination to maintain peace and inviolable faith with all nations, and that system of neutrality and impartiality among the belligerent powers of Europe which has been adopted by this Government and so solemnly sanctioned by both Houses of Congress and applauded by the legislatures of the States and the public opinion, until it shall be otherwise ordained by Congress; if a personal esteem for the French nation, formed in a residence of seven years chiefly among them, and a sincere desire to preserve the friendship which has been so much for the honor and interest of both nations; if, while the conscious honor and integrity of the people of America and the internal sentiment of their own power and energies must be preserved, an earnest endeavor to investigate every just cause and remove every colorable pretense of complaint; if an intention to pursue by amicable negotiation a reparation for the injuries that have been committed on the commerce of our fellow-citizens by whatever nation, and if success can not be obtained, to lay the facts before the Legislature, that they may consider what further measures the honor and interest of the Government and its constituents demand; if a resolution to do justice as far as may depend upon me, at all times and to all nations, and maintain peace, friendship, and benevolence with all the world; if an unshaken confidence in the honor, spirit, and resources of the American people, on which I have so often hazarded my all and never been deceived; if elevated ideas of the high destinies of this country and of my own duties toward it, founded on a knowledge of the moral principles and intellectual improvements of the people deeply engraven on my mind in early life, and not obscured but exalted by experience and age; and, with humble reverence, I feel it to be my duty to add, if a veneration for the religion of a people who profess and call themselves Christians, and a fixed resolution to consider a decent respect for Christianity among the best recommendations for the public service, can enable me in any degree to comply with your wishes, it shall be my strenuous endeavor that this sagacious injunction of the two Houses shall not be without effect.

On this topic, I might be better off staying quiet or approaching it cautiously; however, since some comments are expected, I hope the context will excuse me if I say that if I genuinely prefer a free republican government—formed after careful thought and thorough, unbiased searches for truth; if I am committed to the Constitution of the United States and determined to uphold it until it gets changed by the people's collective judgments and desires, expressed in the manner prescribed in it; if I show respectful attention to the constitutions of individual States and constantly exercise caution and sensitivity toward State governments; if I regard the rights, interests, honor, and happiness of all States in the Union equally, without favoring any northern or southern, eastern or western positions, their varying political opinions on minor issues, or their personal attachments; if I appreciate virtuous individuals from all parties and backgrounds; if I have a love for knowledge and education, and wish to support every reasonable effort to promote schools, colleges, universities, academies, and any institutions that spread knowledge, virtue, and religion among all people, not only for the positive impact on happiness throughout different stages and classes of life, and on society in all its forms, but as the sole way to protect our Constitution from its natural enemies—the spirit of deceit, party politics, intrigue, blatant corruption, and harmful foreign influence, which threatens elective governments; if I advocate for equal laws, justice, and humanity within our administration; if I am eager to advance agriculture, commerce, and manufacturing for our needs, convenience, and defense; if I have a fair and humane approach toward the Native nations of America and a desire to improve their situation by encouraging mutual friendliness; if I am determined to maintain peace and unwavering faith with all nations, following a system of neutrality and impartiality among the rival powers of Europe as this Government has adopted and both Houses of Congress have solemnly endorsed, widely supported by state legislatures and public opinion until Congress decides otherwise; if I have a personal respect for the French nation, developed during my seven years of living among them, and a sincere wish to maintain the friendship that has benefited both nations; if I strive to safeguard the honorable reputation and integrity of the American people while recognizing their power and potential; if I earnestly investigate every legitimate concern and eliminate any unfounded complaints; if I intend to pursue a diplomatic resolution for the damages caused to our citizens’ commerce by any nation, and if that fails, to present the facts to the Legislature for them to consider what further actions are needed for the honor and interest of the Government and its people; if I am resolved to act with justice as much as I can, at all times and toward all nations, while fostering peace, friendship, and goodwill with everyone; if I truly believe in the honor, spirit, and resources of the American people, on which I have often risked everything and never been let down; if I have lofty aspirations for this country's great future and my responsibilities toward it, rooted in an understanding of the moral principles and intellectual advancements of the people, firmly etched in my mind since youth, and not dimmed but enhanced by experience and age; and, with humble respect, I feel it is my duty to say that if holding a deep respect for the religion of a people who identify as Christians, and a strong resolve to see polite regard for Christianity as one of the best qualifications for public service can help me meet your expectations, I will do everything in my power to ensure that this wise request from both Houses has a consequential impact.

With this great example before me, with the sense and spirit, the faith and honor, the duty and interest, of the same American people pledged to support the Constitution of the United States, I entertain no doubt of its continuance in all its energy, and my mind is prepared without hesitation to lay myself under the most solemn obligations to support it to the utmost of my power.

With this great example in front of me, with the common sense and spirit, the faith and honor, the duty and interest of the American people dedicated to upholding the Constitution of the United States, I have no doubt it will continue to thrive, and I am fully ready to commit myself to the most serious obligations to support it to the best of my ability.

And may that Being who is supreme over all, the Patron of Order, the Fountain of Justice, and the Protector in all ages of the world of virtuous liberty, continue His blessing upon this nation and its Government and give it all possible success and duration consistent with the ends of His providence.

And may the highest power, the Guardian of Order, the Source of Justice, and the Protector of virtuous freedom throughout time, keep blessing this nation and its Government and grant it every possible success and longevity in line with His divine plan.






THOMAS JEFFERSON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

IN THE WASHINGTON, D.C., WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1801

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall administered the first executive oath of office ever taken in the new federal city in the new Senate Chamber (now the Old Supreme Court Chamber) of the partially built Capitol building. The outcome of the election of 1800 had been in doubt until late February because Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, the two leading candidates, each had received 73 electoral votes. Consequently, the House of Representatives met in a special session to resolve the impasse, pursuant to the terms spelled out in the Constitution. After 30 hours of debate and balloting, Mr. Jefferson emerged as the President and Mr. Burr the Vice President. President John Adams, who had run unsuccessfully for a second term, left Washington on the day of the inauguration without attending the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall administered the first executive oath of office ever taken in the new federal city in the new Senate Chamber (now the Old Supreme Court Chamber) of the partially built Capitol building. The outcome of the election of 1800 was uncertain until late February because Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, the two leading candidates, each received 73 electoral votes. As a result, the House of Representatives held a special session to break the deadlock, as specified in the Constitution. After 30 hours of debate and voting, Mr. Jefferson became President and Mr. Burr became Vice President. President John Adams, who lost his bid for a second term, left Washington on the day of the inauguration without attending the ceremony.]


Friends and Fellow-Citizens:

Friends and Neighbors:

Called upon to undertake the duties of the first executive office of our country, I avail myself of the presence of that portion of my fellow-citizens which is here assembled to express my grateful thanks for the favor with which they have been pleased to look toward me, to declare a sincere consciousness that the task is above my talents, and that I approach it with those anxious and awful presentiments which the greatness of the charge and the weakness of my powers so justly inspire. A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with the rich productions of their industry, engaged in commerce with nations who feel power and forget right, advancing rapidly to destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye—when I contemplate these transcendent objects, and see the honor, the happiness, and the hopes of this beloved country committed to the issue, and the auspices of this day, I shrink from the contemplation, and humble myself before the magnitude of the undertaking. Utterly, indeed, should I despair did not the presence of many whom I here see remind me that in the other high authorities provided by our Constitution I shall find resources of wisdom, of virtue, and of zeal on which to rely under all difficulties. To you, then, gentlemen, who are charged with the sovereign functions of legislation, and to those associated with you, I look with encouragement for that guidance and support which may enable us to steer with safety the vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world.

Called to take on the responsibilities of the highest office in our country, I want to take a moment to thank my fellow citizens who are here for the trust they’ve placed in me. I genuinely feel that this task is beyond my abilities, and I approach it with a sense of anxiety and awe, recognizing how significant the responsibility is and how limited my own capabilities are. We are a growing nation, spread across a vast and fruitful land, navigating all the seas with the products of our industry, engaging in trade with other nations that prioritize power over fairness, and rapidly moving toward a future beyond our understanding—when I think about these tremendous challenges, and see the honor, happiness, and hopes of this beloved country resting on the outcome of today, I feel overwhelmed and humbled by the scale of what lies ahead. I would be utterly despairing if not for the presence of many familiar faces here, reminding me that in the other esteemed officials provided by our Constitution, I will find wisdom, virtue, and energy to rely on during tough times. So, to you, gentlemen involved in creating laws, and to those working alongside you, I look to for the encouragement and support that can help us navigate safely through the turbulent waters of our world together.

During the contest of opinion through which we have passed the animation of discussions and of exertions has sometimes worn an aspect which might impose on strangers unused to think freely and to speak and to write what they think; but this being now decided by the voice of the nation, announced according to the rules of the Constitution, all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good. All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. Let us, then, fellow-citizens, unite with one heart and one mind. Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions. During the throes and convulsions of the ancient world, during the agonizing spasms of infuriated man, seeking through blood and slaughter his long-lost liberty, it was not wonderful that the agitation of the billows should reach even this distant and peaceful shore; that this should be more felt and feared by some and less by others, and should divide opinions as to measures of safety. But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. I know, indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a government which has so far kept us free and firm on the theoretic and visionary fear that this Government, the world's best hope, may by possibility want energy to preserve itself? I trust not. I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.

During the debate we've experienced, the energy of discussions and efforts sometimes appeared overwhelming, potentially confusing to outsiders who aren't used to thinking freely or expressing their thoughts openly. However, now that this has been determined by the voice of the nation, according to the rules of the Constitution, everyone will naturally align with the law and work together for the common good. Everyone should also remember this important principle: although the will of the majority should always prevail, it must be reasonable to be considered just; the minority has equal rights that must be protected by the law, and violating them would be oppression. So let’s come together, fellow citizens, with one heart and one mind. Let’s bring back the harmony and affection in our social interactions because without them, liberty and even life itself become dull. Let’s also recognize that having eliminated religious intolerance, which caused mankind so much suffering, we haven't truly succeeded if we allow political intolerance, which can be just as cruel and lead to harsh persecution. During the turmoil and struggles of the past, amid the anguished attempts of people to regain their lost liberty through violence, it’s not surprising that the waves of unrest would even touch our calm shores; this affected some more than others and created differing views on how to stay safe. However, not every difference in opinion is a difference in fundamental belief. We’ve called each other by different names while holding the same core values. We’re all Republicans; we’re all Federalists. If there are those among us who wish to break this Union or change its republican nature, let them exist peacefully as reminders that differing opinions can be tolerated when reason is free to challenge them. I understand that some honest individuals worry that a republican government might not be strong enough, but would a true patriot walk away from a government that has kept us free and sturdy out of a theoretical fear that this, the world's best hope, might lack the strength to survive? I certainly hope not. I believe, on the contrary, that this is the strongest government on earth. It’s the only one where every person, when called by the law, would rush to defend it and treat threats to public order as their personal responsibility. Sometimes people say that man cannot be trusted to govern himself. Can he be trusted to govern others instead? Or have we found angels among kings to rule over him? Let history answer that question.

Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation; entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter—with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

Let's, then, with courage and confidence, pursue our own federal and republican principles, our commitment to unity and representative government. We are naturally separated by a vast ocean from the destructive chaos of one part of the world; too noble to tolerate the shame from others; blessed with a vast land, with enough space for our descendants for countless generations; recognizing our equal right to use our own talents, to benefit from our own hard work, to earn respect and trust from our fellow citizens—not from birth but from our actions and their perceptions of them; enlightened by a kind religion, expressed and practiced in various forms, but all teaching honesty, truthfulness, self-control, gratitude, and love for one another; acknowledging and worshiping a higher power that shows through all its actions that it cares for the happiness of humanity now and for greater happiness in the future—with all these blessings, what more do we need to be a happy and prosperous people? Still, one thing more, fellow citizens—a wise and frugal government that keeps individuals from harming one another, while allowing them the freedom to pursue their own work and improvement, and not taking away the bread that labor has earned. This is the essence of good governance, and this is what we need to complete our happiness.

About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people—a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.

As we prepare to begin our duties, my fellow citizens, it’s important for you to understand what I believe are the essential principles of our government and what should guide its administration. I will keep these principles as concise as possible, stating the general ideas without all the details. We must ensure equal and fair justice for everyone, regardless of their social or political status; maintain peace, promote trade, and foster genuine friendships with all countries, while avoiding complicated alliances; uphold the rights of state governments, which are best suited for managing our internal affairs and protecting against anti-republican movements; preserve the General Government with its full constitutional authority, as it is the foundation of our domestic peace and foreign safety; safeguard the people's right to vote, which serves as a gentle and safe way to correct abuses when peaceful solutions are unavailable; accept the majority's decisions as the fundamental principle of republics, with no recourse but to force, which is the breeding ground for tyranny; support a well-trained militia, our greatest asset in times of peace and the initial moments of war until regular troops can take over; ensure civilian authority prevails over military power; practice financial responsibility in government spending so that the burden on workers is light; honor our debts and uphold public trust; promote agriculture alongside commerce as its partner; spread awareness and hold accountable any abuses before public scrutiny; protect freedom of religion, freedom of the press, personal freedom under habeas corpus, and fair trial by unbiased juries. These principles create the guiding star that has led us through times of revolution and reform. The wisdom of our leaders and the sacrifices of our heroes have been dedicated to achieving them. They should be the core of our political beliefs, a basis for civic education, and the standard to evaluate those we trust. If we stray from them during troubled times, let us quickly find our way back to the path that leads to peace, freedom, and safety.

I repair, then, fellow-citizens, to the post you have assigned me. With experience enough in subordinate offices to have seen the difficulties of this the greatest of all, I have learnt to expect that it will rarely fall to the lot of imperfect man to retire from this station with the reputation and the favor which bring him into it. Without pretensions to that high confidence you reposed in our first and greatest revolutionary character, whose preeminent services had entitled him to the first place in his country's love and destined for him the fairest page in the volume of faithful history, I ask so much confidence only as may give firmness and effect to the legal administration of your affairs. I shall often go wrong through defect of judgment. When right, I shall often be thought wrong by those whose positions will not command a view of the whole ground. I ask your indulgence for my own errors, which will never be intentional, and your support against the errors of others, who may condemn what they would not if seen in all its parts. The approbation implied by your suffrage is a great consolation to me for the past, and my future solicitude will be to retain the good opinion of those who have bestowed it in advance, to conciliate that of others by doing them all the good in my power, and to be instrumental to the happiness and freedom of all.

I am now taking on the role you've assigned me, fellow citizens. Having enough experience in lower positions to understand the challenges of this one, I realize that it's rare for an imperfect person to leave this role with the same reputation and favor that brought them here. Without claiming the high trust you placed in our first and greatest revolutionary leader, whose outstanding contributions earned him a special place in the hearts of his countrymen and a prominent spot in history, I only ask for enough confidence to help me effectively manage your affairs. I know I'll make mistakes due to my judgment. When I'm right, some will still think I'm wrong because they can't see the whole picture. I ask for your patience with my mistakes, which will never be intentional, and your support against the mistakes of others, who may judge things without seeing all aspects. Your approval, shown through your vote, brings me great comfort for the past, and in the future, I will strive to keep the good opinion of those who have already offered it, win over others by doing all the good I can, and contribute to the happiness and freedom of everyone.

Relying, then, on the patronage of your good will, I advance with obedience to the work, ready to retire from it whenever you become sensible how much better choice it is in your power to make. And may that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity.

Relying on your goodwill, I proceed with this work, ready to step back whenever you realize that you have a better choice at your disposal. And may the Infinite Power that governs the universe guide our decisions toward what is best and bring about a positive outcome for your peace and prosperity.






THOMAS JEFFERSON SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

IN WASHINGTON D.C., MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1805

[Transcriber's note: The second inauguration of Mr. Jefferson followed an election under which the offices of President and Vice President were to be separately sought, pursuant to the newly adopted 12th Amendment to the Constitution. George Clinton of New York was elected Vice President. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office in the Senate Chamber at the Capitol.]

[Transcriber's note: The second inauguration of Mr. Jefferson came after an election where the President and Vice President positions were sought separately, in line with the newly adopted 12th Amendment to the Constitution. George Clinton of New York was elected Vice President. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office in the Senate Chamber at the Capitol.]


Proceeding, fellow-citizens, to that qualification which the Constitution requires before my entrance on the charge again conferred on me, it is my duty to express the deep sense I entertain of this new proof of confidence from my fellow-citizens at large, and the zeal with which it inspires me so to conduct myself as may best satisfy their just expectations.

Moving forward, fellow citizens, I want to address the qualification that the Constitution requires before I take on the role that has been entrusted to me again. It's my responsibility to express how grateful I am for this renewed confidence from all of you, and the enthusiasm it brings me to act in a way that will best meet your rightful expectations.

On taking this station on a former occasion I declared the principles on which I believed it my duty to administer the affairs of our Commonwealth. MY conscience tells me I have on every occasion acted up to that declaration according to its obvious import and to the understanding of every candid mind.

When I took this position before, I stated the principles that I believed guided my duty to manage the affairs of our Commonwealth. My conscience tells me that I have consistently acted in line with that declaration, in a way that aligns with its clear meaning and the understanding of any open-minded person.

In the transaction of your foreign affairs we have endeavored to cultivate the friendship of all nations, and especially of those with which we have the most important relations. We have done them justice on all occasions, favored where favor was lawful, and cherished mutual interests and intercourse on fair and equal terms. We are firmly convinced, and we act on that conviction, that with nations as with individuals our interests soundly calculated will ever be found inseparable from our moral duties, and history bears witness to the fact that a just nation is trusted on its word when recourse is had to armaments and wars to bridle others.

In managing our foreign affairs, we have worked to build friendships with all nations, especially those with which we have the most significant connections. We have treated them fairly at all times, offered support where it was appropriate, and nurtured mutual interests and interactions on fair and equal grounds. We genuinely believe, and act on that belief, that with nations, just like with individuals, our well-considered interests are always tied to our moral responsibilities. History shows that a just nation is trusted to keep its word when other nations resort to military power and conflict to control others.

At home, fellow-citizens, you best know whether we have done well or ill. The suppression of unnecessary offices, of useless establishments and expenses, enabled us to discontinue our internal taxes. These, covering our land with officers and opening our doors to their intrusions, had already begun that process of domiciliary vexation which once entered is scarcely to be restrained from reaching successively every article of property and produce. If among these taxes some minor ones fell which had not been inconvenient, it was because their amount would not have paid the officers who collected them, and because, if they had any merit, the State authorities might adopt them instead of others less approved.

At home, fellow citizens, you know best whether we've done a good or bad job. Cutting unnecessary positions, useless institutions, and expenses allowed us to eliminate our internal taxes. These taxes, which burdened our land with officials and opened our doors to their intrusions, had already started that annoying process of home interference that, once it begins, is hard to stop from affecting every piece of property and product. If some minor taxes were removed that hadn't been too bothersome, it was because the cost to collect them was more than the revenue they brought in, and if they had any value, the state authorities might keep them instead of choosing others that were less favorable.

The remaining revenue on the consumption of foreign articles is paid chiefly by those who can afford to add foreign luxuries to domestic comforts, being collected on our seaboard and frontiers only, and incorporated with the transactions of our mercantile citizens, it may be the pleasure and the pride of an American to ask, What farmer, what mechanic, what laborer ever sees a taxgatherer of the United States? These contributions enable us to support the current expenses of the Government, to fulfill contracts with foreign nations, to extinguish the native right of soil within our limits, to extend those limits, and to apply such a surplus to our public debts as places at a short day their final redemption, and that redemption once effected the revenue thereby liberated may, by a just repartition of it among the States and a corresponding amendment of the Constitution, be applied in time of peace to rivers, canals, roads, arts, manufactures, education, and other great objects within each State. In time of war, if injustice by ourselves or others must sometimes produce war, increased as the same revenue will be by increased population and consumption, and aided by other resources reserved for that crisis, it may meet within the year all the expenses of the year without encroaching on the rights of future generations by burthening them with the debts of the past. War will then be but a suspension of useful works, and a return to a state of peace, a return to the progress of improvement.

The remaining revenue from the consumption of foreign goods is mainly paid by those who can afford to add foreign luxuries to their domestic comforts. This revenue is collected along our coastlines and borders and is part of the activities of our merchants. It's a point of pride for Americans to ask: Which farmer, mechanic, or laborer ever encounters a tax collector from the United States? These contributions help us cover the current expenses of the Government, fulfill contracts with other nations, extinguish the native claims to land within our borders, expand those borders, and use any surplus to pay off our public debts quickly. Once those debts are settled, the freed-up revenue could be distributed fairly among the States and adjusted through constitutional changes, allowing us to invest in rivers, canals, roads, arts, manufacturing, education, and other significant projects during peacetime. In wartime, if injustice by ourselves or others leads to conflict, any increase in revenue from growing population and consumption, along with other resources set aside for emergencies, can cover all annual expenses without burdening future generations with past debts. Then, war would merely pause productive work, and returning to peace would allow for continued progress and improvement.

I have said, fellow-citizens, that the income reserved had enabled us to extend our limits, but that extension may possibly pay for itself before we are called on, and in the meantime may keep down the accruing interest; in all events, it will replace the advances we shall have made. I know that the acquisition of Louisiana had been disapproved by some from a candid apprehension that the enlargement of our territory would endanger its union. But who can limit the extent to which the federative principle may operate effectively? The larger our association the less will it be shaken by local passions; and in any view is it not better that the opposite bank of the Mississippi should be settled by our own brethren and children than by strangers of another family? With which should we be most likely to live in harmony and friendly intercourse?

I have mentioned, fellow citizens, that the reserved income has allowed us to expand our boundaries, but that expansion might pay for itself before we need to respond, and in the meantime, it can reduce accumulating interest; in any case, it will cover the expenses we will have made. I’m aware that some disapproved of acquiring Louisiana out of a genuine concern that increasing our territory would threaten our unity. But who can say how far the federal principle can work effectively? The larger our union, the less it will be affected by local conflicts; and isn’t it better for the opposite bank of the Mississippi to be settled by our own people and kids rather than by outsiders from a different background? With whom are we more likely to live peacefully and maintain friendly relations?

In matters of religion I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the Constitution independent of the powers of the General Government. I have therefore undertaken on no occasion to prescribe the religious exercises suited to it, but have left them, as the Constitution found them, under the direction and discipline of the church or state authorities acknowledged by the several religious societies.

In terms of religion, I believe that its free practice is protected by the Constitution and separate from the powers of the federal government. Because of this, I have never tried to dictate what religious practices should be followed; instead, I've allowed them to remain, as the Constitution intended, under the guidance and rules of the church or state authorities recognized by the various religious groups.

The aboriginal inhabitants of these countries I have regarded with the commiseration their history inspires. Endowed with the faculties and the rights of men, breathing an ardent love of liberty and independence, and occupying a country which left them no desire but to be undisturbed, the stream of overflowing population from other regions directed itself on these shores; without power to divert or habits to contend against it, they have been overwhelmed by the current or driven before it; now reduced within limits too narrow for the hunter's state, humanity enjoins us to teach them agriculture and the domestic arts; to encourage them to that industry which alone can enable them to maintain their place in existence and to prepare them in time for that state of society which to bodily comforts adds the improvement of the mind and morals. We have therefore liberally furnished them with the implements of husbandry and household use; we have placed among them instructors in the arts of first necessity, and they are covered with the aegis of the law against aggressors from among ourselves.

The native people of these countries have my sympathy because of their history. Gifted with the abilities and rights of human beings, filled with a strong love for freedom and independence, and living in a land that only wished to let them be, they found themselves facing a flood of people from other areas. Lacking the power to change this flow or the habits to resist it, they were swept away or pushed along with it. Now confined to a space far too small for a hunting lifestyle, it is our duty to teach them farming and home skills, and to motivate them toward the work that will allow them to sustain their existence and prepare them for a society that enhances both physical well-being and moral and intellectual growth. Therefore, we have generously provided them with farming tools and household items; we have sent teachers to instruct them in essential skills, and they are protected by the law from aggressors among us.

But the endeavors to enlighten them on the fate which awaits their present course of life, to induce them to exercise their reason, follow its dictates, and change their pursuits with the change of circumstances have powerful obstacles to encounter; they are combated by the habits of their bodies, prejudices of their minds, ignorance, pride, and the influence of interested and crafty individuals among them who feel themselves something in the present order of things and fear to become nothing in any other. These persons inculcate a sanctimonious reverence for the customs of their ancestors; that whatsoever they did must be done through all time; that reason is a false guide, and to advance under its counsel in their physical, moral, or political condition is perilous innovation; that their duty is to remain as their Creator made them, ignorance being safety and knowledge full of danger; in short, my friends, among them also is seen the action and counteraction of good sense and of bigotry; they too have their antiphilosophists who find an interest in keeping things in their present state, who dread reformation, and exert all their faculties to maintain the ascendancy of habit over the duty of improving our reason and obeying its mandates.

But the efforts to inform them about the future that awaits their current way of life, to encourage them to use their reasoning, follow its guidance, and adjust their pursuits as circumstances change, face significant challenges; they are hindered by their bodily habits, mental prejudices, ignorance, pride, and the influence of manipulative individuals among them who feel important in the current system and fear losing their status. These people promote a false reverence for the traditions of their ancestors, insisting that everything they did must be repeated forever; they claim that reason is a misleading guide, and pursuing it in their physical, moral, or political situation is a dangerous innovation; they believe that their duty is to remain as their Creator made them, with ignorance being safety and knowledge being full of danger; in short, my friends, among them too can be seen the struggle between common sense and bigotry; they also have their anti-philosophers who benefit from maintaining the status quo, who fear reform, and use all their efforts to uphold the dominance of habit over the responsibility to improve our reasoning and follow its calls.

In giving these outlines I do not mean, fellow-citizens, to arrogate to myself the merit of the measures. That is due, in the first place, to the reflecting character of our citizens at large, who, by the weight of public opinion, influence and strengthen the public measures. It is due to the sound discretion with which they select from among themselves those to whom they confide the legislative duties. It is due to the zeal and wisdom of the characters thus selected, who lay the foundations of public happiness in wholesome laws, the execution of which alone remains for others, and it is due to the able and faithful auxiliaries, whose patriotism has associated them with me in the executive functions.

In sharing these outlines, I don’t want to take credit for the measures myself, fellow citizens. That credit goes primarily to the thoughtful nature of our citizens as a whole, who, through the power of public opinion, influence and support public initiatives. It’s thanks to their good judgment in choosing from among themselves those who will handle legislative responsibilities. It’s also due to the passion and insight of those selected, who establish the foundation for public well-being through effective laws, which only need to be enforced by others. Lastly, it’s thanks to the skilled and dedicated partners whose patriotism has joined them with me in executing these functions.

During this course of administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been leveled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare. These abuses of an institution so important to freedom and science are deeply to be regretted, inasmuch as they tend to lessen its usefulness and to sap its safety. They might, indeed, have been corrected by the wholesome punishments reserved to and provided by the laws of the several States against falsehood and defamation, but public duties more urgent press on the time of public servants, and the offenders have therefore been left to find their punishment in the public indignation.

During this time in office, and in an attempt to disrupt it, the media has targeted us with everything its recklessness could come up with or dare to say. These abuses of such an important institution for freedom and knowledge are truly regrettable, as they diminish its value and undermine its safety. They could have been addressed through the proper penalties outlined in the laws of various States against falsehood and defamation, but the pressing demands of public service have taken precedence for us, leaving the wrongdoers to face their consequences through public outrage.

Nor was it uninteresting to the world that an experiment should be fairly and fully made, whether freedom of discussion, unaided by power, is not sufficient for the propagation and protection of truth—whether a government conducting itself in the true spirit of its constitution, with zeal and purity, and doing no act which it would be unwilling the whole world should witness, can be written down by falsehood and defamation. The experiment has been tried; you have witnessed the scene; our fellow-citizens looked on, cool and collected; they saw the latent source from which these outrages proceeded; they gathered around their public functionaries, and when the Constitution called them to the decision by suffrage, they pronounced their verdict, honorable to those who had served them and consolatory to the friend of man who believes that he may be trusted with the control of his own affairs.

It was also intriguing to the world that a fair and thorough experiment could be conducted to see if freedom of discussion, without the backing of power, is enough to spread and protect the truth. It questioned whether a government that acts in line with its constitution, with dedication and integrity, and does nothing it wouldn’t want the whole world to see, can be brought down by lies and slander. This experiment has been carried out; you have witnessed it. Our fellow citizens observed the situation calmly and rationally; they recognized the underlying source of these attacks; they rallied around their public officials, and when the Constitution called them to vote, they delivered a verdict that honored those who served them and offered comfort to the friend of humanity who believes he can manage his own affairs.

No inference is here intended that the laws provided by the States against false and defamatory publications should not be enforced; he who has time renders a service to public morals and public tranquillity in reforming these abuses by the salutary coercions of the law; but the experiment is noted to prove that, since truth and reason have maintained their ground against false opinions in league with false facts, the press, confined to truth, needs no other legal restraint; the public judgment will correct false reasoning and opinions on a full hearing of all parties; and no other definite line can be drawn between the inestimable liberty of the press and its demoralizing licentiousness. If there be still improprieties which this rule would not restrain, its supplement must be sought in the censorship of public opinion.

No suggestion is made that the laws established by the states against false and defamatory publications should not be enforced; those who take the time to do so help uphold public morals and maintain peace by addressing these abuses through the necessary legal actions. However, the point being made is that since truth and reason have prevailed over false opinions aligned with false facts, a press that adheres to the truth requires no additional legal restrictions; public judgment will correct misinformation and opinions after hearing from all sides. There’s no clear boundary that can be established between the invaluable freedom of the press and its potentially harmful excesses. If there are still issues that this principle wouldn’t address, any necessary corrections must come from public opinion.

Contemplating the union of sentiment now manifested so generally as auguring harmony and happiness to our future course, I offer to our country sincere congratulations. With those, too, not yet rallied to the same point the disposition to do so is gaining strength; facts are piercing through the veil drawn over them, and our doubting brethren will at length see that the mass of their fellow-citizens with whom they can not yet resolve to act as to principles and measures, think as they think and desire what they desire; that our wish as well as theirs is that the public efforts may be directed honestly to the public good, that peace be cultivated, civil and religious liberty unassailed, law and order preserved, equality of rights maintained, and that state of property, equal or unequal, which results to every man from his own industry or that of his father's. When satisfied of these views it is not in human nature that they should not approve and support them. In the meantime let us cherish them with patient affection, let us do them justice, and more than justice, in all competitions of interest; and we need not doubt that truth, reason, and their own interests will at length prevail, will gather them into the fold of their country, and will complete that entire union of opinion which gives to a nation the blessing of harmony and the benefit of all its strength.

Thinking about the connection of feelings that is now widely seen as promising peace and happiness for our future, I offer my heartfelt congratulations to our country. Even among those who have not yet come together in the same way, the desire to do so is growing stronger; the truth is breaking through the barriers that have been created, and our uncertain friends will eventually realize that the majority of their fellow citizens, with whom they still struggle to align on principles and actions, share the same thoughts and aspirations. Our wish, just like theirs, is for public efforts to be sincerely aimed at the common good, for peace to be nurtured, for civil and religious freedoms to remain intact, for law and order to be upheld, for equal rights to be maintained, and for individuals to enjoy the rewards of their own work or that of their ancestors, be it equal or unequal. Once they recognize these views, it’s only human nature that they will support and endorse them. In the meantime, let us nurture these beliefs with patient care, let us ensure fairness and then some in all matters of competing interests; we can trust that truth, reason, and their own self-interest will ultimately win out, bringing them back into the embrace of their country and completing that full unity of thought which grants a nation the gift of harmony and the advantage of its collective strength.

I shall now enter on the duties to which my fellow-citizens have again called me, and shall proceed in the spirit of those principles which they have approved. I fear not that any motives of interest may lead me astray; I am sensible of no passion which could seduce me knowingly from the path of justice, but the weaknesses of human nature and the limits of my own understanding will produce errors of judgment sometimes injurious to your interests. I shall need, therefore, all the indulgence which I have heretofore experienced from my constituents; the want of it will certainly not lessen with increasing years. I shall need, too, the favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our fathers, as Israel of old, from their native land and planted them in a country flowing with all the necessaries and comforts of life; who has covered our infancy with His providence and our riper years with His wisdom and power, and to whose goodness I ask you to join in supplications with me that He will so enlighten the minds of your servants, guide their councils, and prosper their measures that whatsoever they do shall result in your good, and shall secure to you the peace, friendship, and approbation of all nations.

I’m now stepping into the responsibilities that my fellow citizens have once again called me to, and I’ll move forward in the spirit of the principles they support. I’m not afraid that any personal interests will lead me off course; I don’t feel any passion that could knowingly distract me from doing what’s right. However, the weaknesses of human nature and the limits of my own understanding can sometimes lead to judgment errors that might hurt your interests. I will need all the understanding you’ve shown me in the past; that need won’t decrease as I grow older. I’ll also require the support of the higher power in whose hands we are, who guided our ancestors, like Israel of old, from their homeland and settled them in a land rich with the necessities and comforts of life; who has protected our early years with His care and our later years with His wisdom and strength. I ask you to join me in praying for His guidance, that He will enlighten the minds of your representatives, direct their decisions, and ensure that everything they do will benefit you and secure your peace, friendship, and approval from all nations.






JAMES MADISON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1809

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office in the Hall of the House of Representatives (now National Statuary Hall). Subsequently the oath by Presidents-elect, with few exceptions, was taken in the House Chamber or in a place of the Capitol associated with the Congress as a whole. The Vice Presidential oath of office for most administrations was taken in the Senate Chamber. President Jefferson watched the ceremony, but he joined the crowd of assembled visitors since he no longer was an office-holder. The mild March weather drew a crowd of about 10,000 persons.]

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office in the Hall of the House of Representatives (now National Statuary Hall). After that, Presidents-elect usually took their oath in the House Chamber or in another part of the Capitol linked to Congress as a whole. For most administrations, the Vice Presidential oath of office was taken in the Senate Chamber. President Jefferson watched the ceremony but joined the gathered crowd since he was no longer in office. The mild March weather attracted around 10,000 people.]


Unwilling to depart from examples of the most revered authority, I avail myself of the occasion now presented to express the profound impression made on me by the call of my country to the station to the duties of which I am about to pledge myself by the most solemn of sanctions. So distinguished a mark of confidence, proceeding from the deliberate and tranquil suffrage of a free and virtuous nation, would under any circumstances have commanded my gratitude and devotion, as well as filled me with an awful sense of the trust to be assumed. Under the various circumstances which give peculiar solemnity to the existing period, I feel that both the honor and the responsibility allotted to me are inexpressibly enhanced.

Not wanting to stray from the examples set by the most respected authority, I’d like to take this opportunity to share how deeply impacted I am by my country’s call to the position I am about to commit to with the most serious of promises. Such a remarkable sign of trust, coming from the careful and thoughtful support of a free and virtuous nation, would have always earned my gratitude and loyalty, while also overwhelming me with the weight of the responsibility I’m about to take on. Given the unique circumstances that add special significance to this moment, I feel that both the honor and the responsibility given to me are infinitely greater.

The present situation of the world is indeed without a parallel and that of our own country full of difficulties. The pressure of these, too, is the more severely felt because they have fallen upon us at a moment when the national prosperity being at a height not before attained, the contrast resulting from the change has been rendered the more striking. Under the benign influence of our republican institutions, and the maintenance of peace with all nations whilst so many of them were engaged in bloody and wasteful wars, the fruits of a just policy were enjoyed in an unrivaled growth of our faculties and resources. Proofs of this were seen in the improvements of agriculture, in the successful enterprises of commerce, in the progress of manufacturers and useful arts, in the increase of the public revenue and the use made of it in reducing the public debt, and in the valuable works and establishments everywhere multiplying over the face of our land.

The current state of the world is truly unprecedented, and our country is facing significant challenges. We feel the weight of these difficulties even more because they hit us at a time when national prosperity was at an all-time high, making the contrast with our situation even more dramatic. Thanks to our democratic institutions and maintaining peace with other nations while many were caught up in violent and destructive wars, we enjoyed the benefits of a fair policy, leading to exceptional growth in our capabilities and resources. This was evident in advancements in agriculture, the success of commercial ventures, the progress in manufacturing and practical arts, the increase in public revenue, and how it helped reduce public debt, along with the valuable projects and institutions springing up all over our country.

It is a precious reflection that the transition from this prosperous condition of our country to the scene which has for some time been distressing us is not chargeable on any unwarrantable views, nor, as I trust, on any involuntary errors in the public councils. Indulging no passions which trespass on the rights or the repose of other nations, it has been the true glory of the United States to cultivate peace by observing justice, and to entitle themselves to the respect of the nations at war by fulfilling their neutral obligations with the most scrupulous impartiality. If there be candor in the world, the truth of these assertions will not be questioned; posterity at least will do justice to them.

It’s a valuable realization that the shift from our country’s current state of prosperity to the troubling situation we've been facing isn’t due to any unjustified beliefs or, as I hope, any unintentional mistakes made by our leaders. By avoiding any actions that infringe on the rights or peace of other nations, the United States has truly distinguished itself by promoting peace through justice and earning the respect of warring nations by upholding its neutral responsibilities with the utmost fairness. If there's honesty in the world, the truth of these statements won’t be doubted; future generations will certainly recognize their validity.

This unexceptionable course could not avail against the injustice and violence of the belligerent powers. In their rage against each other, or impelled by more direct motives, principles of retaliation have been introduced equally contrary to universal reason and acknowledged law. How long their arbitrary edicts will be continued in spite of the demonstrations that not even a pretext for them has been given by the United States, and of the fair and liberal attempt to induce a revocation of them, can not be anticipated. Assuring myself that under every vicissitude the determined spirit and united councils of the nation will be safeguards to its honor and its essential interests, I repair to the post assigned me with no other discouragement than what springs from my own inadequacy to its high duties. If I do not sink under the weight of this deep conviction it is because I find some support in a consciousness of the purposes and a confidence in the principles which I bring with me into this arduous service.

This straightforward approach couldn't stand against the injustice and violence of the warring powers. In their fury towards each other, or driven by more direct motives, ideas of retaliation have been introduced that go against universal reason and established law. It's unclear how long their arbitrary decisions will continue, especially since the United States hasn't even provided a valid reason for them, and despite our fair and generous efforts to encourage their cancellation. I'm confident that through every challenge, the determined spirit and unified leadership of the nation will protect its honor and essential interests. I'm heading to the position I've been assigned with no other discouragement than my own feelings of inadequacy for its significant responsibilities. If I manage not to be overwhelmed by this heavy realization, it's because I find some reassurance in my understanding of the goals and my belief in the principles I'm bringing with me into this challenging role.

To cherish peace and friendly intercourse with all nations having correspondent dispositions; to maintain sincere neutrality toward belligerent nations; to prefer in all cases amicable discussion and reasonable accommodation of differences to a decision of them by an appeal to arms; to exclude foreign intrigues and foreign partialities, so degrading to all countries and so baneful to free ones; to foster a spirit of independence too just to invade the rights of others, too proud to surrender our own, too liberal to indulge unworthy prejudices ourselves and too elevated not to look down upon them in others; to hold the union of the States as the basis of their peace and happiness; to support the Constitution, which is the cement of the Union, as well in its limitations as in its authorities; to respect the rights and authorities reserved to the States and to the people as equally incorporated with and essential to the success of the general system; to avoid the slightest interference with the right of conscience or the functions of religion, so wisely exempted from civil jurisdiction; to preserve in their full energy the other salutary provisions in behalf of private and personal rights, and of the freedom of the press; to observe economy in public expenditures; to liberate the public resources by an honorable discharge of the public debts; to keep within the requisite limits a standing military force, always remembering that an armed and trained militia is the firmest bulwark of republics—that without standing armies their liberty can never be in danger, nor with large ones safe; to promote by authorized means improvements friendly to agriculture, to manufactures, and to external as well as internal commerce; to favor in like manner the advancement of science and the diffusion of information as the best aliment to true liberty; to carry on the benevolent plans which have been so meritoriously applied to the conversion of our aboriginal neighbors from the degradation and wretchedness of savage life to a participation of the improvements of which the human mind and manners are susceptible in a civilized state—as far as sentiments and intentions such as these can aid the fulfillment of my duty, they will be a resource which can not fail me.

To value peace and friendly relations with all nations that share similar attitudes; to maintain genuine neutrality towards nations at war; to always prefer peaceful discussion and reasonable resolution of differences over resolving them through conflict; to avoid foreign influence and biases, which are harmful to all countries and especially detrimental to free nations; to nurture a spirit of independence that respects the rights of others, is too proud to give up our own rights, is too open-minded to indulge in unfair prejudices, and is above looking down on others; to view the union of the States as the foundation of our peace and happiness; to uphold the Constitution, which binds the Union together, in both its restrictions and its authorities; to respect the rights and powers reserved for the States and the people, which are equally important for the success of the overall system; to avoid even the slightest interference with personal beliefs or religious practices, which are wisely kept separate from civil authority; to fully maintain other beneficial provisions that support individual and personal rights, as well as freedom of the press; to practice thrift in public spending; to ensure public resources are available by honorably settling public debts; to keep a standing military force within necessary limits, always remembering that a trained militia is the strongest defense for republics—without standing armies, our liberty cannot be threatened, nor can it be safe with large ones; to promote, through authorized means, improvements that are beneficial to agriculture, manufacturing, and both foreign and domestic trade; to similarly support the advancement of science and the spread of knowledge as the best nourishment for true freedom; to continue the benevolent efforts that have successfully helped our indigenous neighbors move from the hardships of tribal life to benefits of civilization—as far as ideals and intentions like these can assist in fulfilling my duty, they will be an invaluable resource for me.

It is my good fortune, moreover, to have the path in which I am to tread lighted by examples of illustrious services successfully rendered in the most trying difficulties by those who have marched before me. Of those of my immediate predecessor it might least become me here to speak. I may, however, be pardoned for not suppressing the sympathy with which my heart is full in the rich reward he enjoys in the benedictions of a beloved country, gratefully bestowed or exalted talents zealously devoted through a long career to the advancement of its highest interest and happiness.

I’m fortunate to have my path illuminated by the inspiring examples of remarkable service that those before me have provided, even in the toughest of times. It would be inappropriate for me to discuss my immediate predecessor here. However, I can’t help but express my admiration for the deep appreciation he receives from a grateful nation, which recognizes his exceptional talents and dedication over a long career towards the nation's greatest interests and well-being.

But the source to which I look or the aids which alone can supply my deficiencies is in the well-tried intelligence and virtue of my fellow-citizens, and in the counsels of those representing them in the other departments associated in the care of the national interests. In these my confidence will under every difficulty be best placed, next to that which we have all been encouraged to feel in the guardianship and guidance of that Almighty Being whose power regulates the destiny of nations, whose blessings have been so conspicuously dispensed to this rising Republic, and to whom we are bound to address our devout gratitude for the past, as well as our fervent supplications and best hopes for the future.

But the support I rely on, or the help that can truly fill my gaps, comes from the proven intelligence and integrity of my fellow citizens, as well as the advice from those representing them in other areas concerned with our national interests. My trust is best placed in these individuals, especially alongside the belief we all share in the protection and guidance of that Almighty Being whose power shapes the fate of nations, whose blessings have been so clearly given to this emerging Republic, and to whom we owe our sincere gratitude for the past, as well as our heartfelt prayers and best hopes for the future.






JAMES MADISON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 1813

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office in the Hall of the House of Representatives. The United States was at war with Great Britain at the time of James Madison's second inauguration. Most of the battles had occurred at sea, and the physical reminders of war seemed remote to the group assembled at the Capitol. In little more than a year, however, both the Capitol and Executive Mansion would be burned by an invading British garrison, and the city thrown into a panic.]

[Transcriber's note: Chief Justice John Marshall gave the oath of office in the Hall of the House of Representatives. The United States was at war with Great Britain during James Madison's second inauguration. Most of the battles had taken place at sea, and the visible signs of war felt distant to the gathering at the Capitol. However, in just over a year, both the Capitol and the Executive Mansion would be set on fire by invading British troops, and the city would be plunged into chaos.]


About to add the solemnity of an oath to the obligations imposed by a second call to the station in which my country heretofore placed me, I find in the presence of this respectable assembly an opportunity of publicly repeating my profound sense of so distinguished a confidence and of the responsibility united with it. The impressions on me are strengthened by such an evidence that my faithful endeavors to discharge my arduous duties have been favorably estimated, and by a consideration of the momentous period at which the trust has been renewed. From the weight and magnitude now belonging to it I should be compelled to shrink if I had less reliance on the support of an enlightened and generous people, and felt less deeply a conviction that the war with a powerful nation, which forms so prominent a feature in our situation, is stamped with that justice which invites the smiles of Heaven on the means of conducting it to a successful termination.

As I prepare to add the seriousness of an oath to the duties assigned to me by another call to serve my country, I see this respected gathering as a chance to publicly express my deep appreciation for such an extraordinary trust and the responsibility that comes with it. I am encouraged by the clear evidence that my hard work to fulfill my challenging responsibilities has been recognized, and by the significant moment at which this trust has been renewed. Given the weight and importance of this role, I would feel overwhelmed if I had less faith in the support of an informed and generous people, and if I didn't firmly believe that the war with a powerful nation, which is such a significant part of our current situation, is grounded in justice that invites divine favor for achieving a successful outcome.

May we not cherish this sentiment without presumption when we reflect on the characters by which this war is distinguished?

May we not hold this feeling without arrogance when we think about the traits that define this war?

It was not declared on the part of the United States until it had been long made on them, in reality though not in name; until arguments and postulations had been exhausted; until a positive declaration had been received that the wrongs provoking it would not be discontinued; nor until this last appeal could no longer be delayed without breaking down the spirit of the nation, destroying all confidence in itself and in its political institutions, and either perpetuating a state of disgraceful suffering or regaining by more costly sacrifices and more severe struggles our lost rank and respect among independent powers.

It wasn't officially announced by the United States until it had already been a long-standing issue, in reality if not in name; until all arguments and discussions had been exhausted; until a clear statement was received that the injustices causing it wouldn't stop; and until this final plea could no longer be postponed without undermining the spirit of the nation, destroying trust in itself and its political institutions, and either continuing a shameful state of suffering or regaining our lost position and respect among independent nations at a greater cost and through more intense struggles.

On the issue of the war are staked our national sovereignty on the high seas and the security of an important class of citizens whose occupations give the proper value to those of every other class. Not to contend for such a stake is to surrender our equality with other powers on the element common to all and to violate the sacred title which every member of the society has to its protection. I need not call into view the unlawfulness of the practice by which our mariners are forced at the will of every cruising officer from their own vessels into foreign ones, nor paint the outrages inseparable from it. The proofs are in the records of each successive Administration of our Government, and the cruel sufferings of that portion of the American people have found their way to every bosom not dead to the sympathies of human nature.

The war is about protecting our national sovereignty on the high seas and ensuring the safety of a key group of citizens whose jobs are vital to every other profession. Failing to fight for this cause means giving up our equality with other nations in a shared space and ignoring the inherent right every member of society has to our protection. I don't need to highlight the illegality of the way our sailors are forced by any cruising officer to leave their own ships for foreign ones, nor describe the abuse that comes with it. The evidence is documented in the records of each administration of our government, and the severe suffering experienced by this part of the American population has reached everyone who is still capable of feeling compassion.

As the war was just in its origin and necessary and noble in its objects, we can reflect with a proud satisfaction that in carrying it on no principle of justice or honor, no usage of civilized nations, no precept of courtesy or humanity, have been infringed. The war has been waged on our part with scrupulous regard to all these obligations, and in a spirit of liberality which was never surpassed.

As the war was just starting and was necessary and noble in its goals, we can feel proud that in conducting it, we didn't violate any principles of justice or honor, any standards of civilized nations, or any rules of courtesy or humanity. We have approached the war with careful respect for all these commitments, and with a spirit of generosity that has never been exceeded.

How little has been the effect of this example on the conduct of the enemy!

How little impact this example has had on the enemy's behavior!

They have retained as prisoners of war citizens of the United States not liable to be so considered under the usages of war.

They have kept as prisoners of war U.S. citizens who shouldn't be classified as such according to the rules of war.

They have refused to consider as prisoners of war, and threatened to punish as traitors and deserters, persons emigrating without restraint to the United States, incorporated by naturalization into our political family, and fighting under the authority of their adopted country in open and honorable war for the maintenance of its rights and safety. Such is the avowed purpose of a Government which is in the practice of naturalizing by thousands citizens of other countries, and not only of permitting but compelling them to fight its battles against their native country.

They have refused to recognize those who emigrate freely to the United States as prisoners of war and threatened to punish them as traitors and deserters. These individuals have been naturalized and are fighting under the authority of their adopted country in an open and honorable war to protect its rights and safety. This is the stated intention of a government that routinely naturalizes thousands of citizens from other countries, not only allowing but forcing them to fight its battles against their homeland.

They have not, it is true, taken into their own hands the hatchet and the knife, devoted to indiscriminate massacre, but they have let loose the savages armed with these cruel instruments; have allured them into their service, and carried them to battle by their sides, eager to glut their savage thirst with the blood of the vanquished and to finish the work of torture and death on maimed and defenseless captives. And, what was never before seen, British commanders have extorted victory over the unconquerable valor of our troops by presenting to the sympathy of their chief captives awaiting massacre from their savage associates. And now we find them, in further contempt of the modes of honorable warfare, supplying the place of a conquering force by attempts to disorganize our political society, to dismember our confederated Republic. Happily, like others, these will recoil on the authors; but they mark the degenerate counsels from which they emanate, and if they did not belong to a sense of unexampled inconsistencies might excite the greater wonder as proceeding from a Government which founded the very war in which it has been so long engaged on a charge against the disorganizing and insurrectional policy of its adversary.

They haven't, it's true, taken the hatchet and the knife into their own hands for random killings, but they have unleashed the savages armed with these brutal tools; they've drawn them into their service and taken them into battle alongside them, eager to satisfy their savage thirst with the blood of the defeated and to complete the work of torture and death on injured and defenseless captives. And, in a first, British commanders have forced victory over the unbeatable courage of our troops by showcasing the sympathy of their chief captives waiting for slaughter at the hands of their savage allies. Now we see them, further disrespecting the rules of honorable warfare, trying to replace a conquering army by attempting to disrupt our political society and tear apart our united Republic. Fortunately, like others before them, these actions will backfire on those who initiated them; but they highlight the degenerate thinking from which they arise, and if it weren't for the glaring contradictions, it might provoke even greater astonishment coming from a government that based its very war on accusations against the disruptive and insurrectionary policies of its opponent.

To render the justice of the war on our part the more conspicuous, the reluctance to commence it was followed by the earliest and strongest manifestations of a disposition to arrest its progress. The sword was scarcely out of the scabbard before the enemy was apprised of the reasonable terms on which it would be resheathed. Still more precise advances were repeated, and have been received in a spirit forbidding every reliance not placed on the military resources of the nation.

To make our commitment to justice in this war more obvious, our hesitation to start it was quickly accompanied by strong signs that we wanted to halt its advancement. The sword was barely drawn before the enemy was informed of the fair terms for putting it back. We reiterated our specific proposals, which were met with a mindset that discouraged any hopes not grounded in the military strength of the nation.

These resources are amply sufficient to bring the war to an honorable issue. Our nation is in number more than half that of the British Isles. It is composed of a brave, a free, a virtuous, and an intelligent people. Our country abounds in the necessaries, the arts, and the comforts of life. A general prosperity is visible in the public countenance. The means employed by the British cabinet to undermine it have recoiled on themselves; have given to our national faculties a more rapid development, and, draining or diverting the precious metals from British circulation and British vaults, have poured them into those of the United States. It is a propitious consideration that an unavoidable war should have found this seasonable facility for the contributions required to support it. When the public voice called for war, all knew, and still know, that without them it could not be carried on through the period which it might last, and the patriotism, the good sense, and the manly spirit of our fellow-citizens are pledges for the cheerfulness with which they will bear each his share of the common burden. To render the war short and its success sure, animated and systematic exertions alone are necessary, and the success of our arms now may long preserve our country from the necessity of another resort to them. Already have the gallant exploits of our naval heroes proved to the world our inherent capacity to maintain our rights on one element. If the reputation of our arms has been thrown under clouds on the other, presaging flashes of heroic enterprise assure us that nothing is wanting to correspondent triumphs there also but the discipline and habits which are in daily progress.

These resources are more than enough to bring the war to a respectable conclusion. Our population is more than half that of the British Isles. We are made up of brave, free, virtuous, and intelligent people. Our country is rich in necessities, skills, and comforts. We can clearly see a general prosperity among the public. The efforts of the British government to weaken us have backfired; they have accelerated the development of our national abilities and have drained or redirected precious metals from British circulation and vaults into those of the United States. It’s fortunate that an unavoidable war has found us with this timely ability to gather the resources needed to support it. When the public called for war, everyone understood, and still knows, that without these resources it couldn't go on as long as it might. The patriotism, common sense, and resolute spirit of our fellow citizens assure us that they will gladly share in the burden. To make the war short and ensure its success, we only need determined and organized efforts, and the current success of our military can help keep our country from needing to resort to arms again for a long time. Our brave naval heroes have already demonstrated our capacity to defend our rights at sea. If our military reputation has taken a hit on land, the promising signs of heroic actions show us that we lack only the discipline and training that are developing every day to achieve similar victories there as well.






JAMES MONROE FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1817

[Transcriber's note: Because the Capitol was under reconstruction after the fire, President-elect Monroe offered to take his oath of office in the House Chamber of the temporary "Brick Capitol," located on the site where the Supreme Court building now stands. A controversy resulted from the inaugural committees proposals concerning the use of the House Chamber on the second floor of the brick building. Speaker Henry Clay declined the use of the hall and suggested that the proceedings be held outside. The President's speech to the crowd from a platform adjacent to the brick building was the first outdoor inaugural address. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office.]

[Transcriber's note: Because the Capitol was being reconstructed after the fire, President-elect Monroe offered to take his oath of office in the House Chamber of the temporary "Brick Capitol," located where the Supreme Court building now stands. A controversy arose from the inaugural committee's proposals about using the House Chamber on the second floor of the brick building. Speaker Henry Clay refused to allow use of the hall and suggested holding the proceedings outside. The President's speech to the crowd from a platform next to the brick building was the first outdoor inaugural address. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office.]


I should be destitute of feeling if I was not deeply affected by the strong proof which my fellow-citizens have given me of their confidence in calling me to the high office whose functions I am about to assume. As the expression of their good opinion of my conduct in the public service, I derive from it a gratification which those who are conscious of having done all that they could to merit it can alone feel. MY sensibility is increased by a just estimate of the importance of the trust and of the nature and extent of its duties, with the proper discharge of which the highest interests of a great and free people are intimately connected. Conscious of my own deficiency, I cannot enter on these duties without great anxiety for the result. From a just responsibility I will never shrink, calculating with confidence that in my best efforts to promote the public welfare my motives will always be duly appreciated and my conduct be viewed with that candor and indulgence which I have experienced in other stations.

I would be devoid of feeling if I weren't profoundly moved by the strong evidence my fellow citizens have shown in their trust by choosing me for the high office I'm about to take on. Their positive regard for my actions in public service brings me a joy that only those who truly believe they've done everything possible to earn it can understand. My sensitivity is heightened by a clear understanding of the importance of this responsibility and the nature and scope of its duties, which are closely linked to the highest interests of a great and free society. Aware of my own shortcomings, I can't approach these duties without significant worry about the outcome. I will never shy away from my responsibilities, confident that my sincere efforts to enhance public welfare will always be recognized, and my actions will be judged with the fairness and understanding I have received in my previous roles.

In commencing the duties of the chief executive office it has been the practice of the distinguished men who have gone before me to explain the principles which would govern them in their respective Administrations. In following their venerated example my attention is naturally drawn to the great causes which have contributed in a principal degree to produce the present happy condition of the United States. They will best explain the nature of our duties and shed much light on the policy which ought to be pursued in future.

As I take on the responsibilities of the chief executive office, it has been standard for the respected leaders before me to outline the principles that guided their Administrations. Following their admirable example, I want to focus on the key factors that have significantly contributed to the current positive state of the United States. They will help clarify our responsibilities and provide insight into the policies we should adopt moving forward.

From the commencement of our Revolution to the present day almost forty years have elapsed, and from the establishment of this Constitution twenty-eight. Through this whole term the Government has been what may emphatically be called self-government. And what has been the effect? To whatever object we turn our attention, whether it relates to our foreign or domestic concerns, we find abundant cause to felicitate ourselves in the excellence of our institutions. During a period fraught with difficulties and marked by very extraordinary events the United States have flourished beyond example. Their citizens individually have been happy and the nation prosperous.

Since the start of our Revolution until now, almost forty years have passed, and it's been twenty-eight since this Constitution was established. Throughout this entire time, the Government has been truly a form of self-government. And what has been the outcome? No matter what we focus on, whether it's our foreign or domestic issues, we have plenty of reasons to celebrate the quality of our institutions. During a time filled with challenges and remarkable events, the United States has thrived like never before. Its citizens have found happiness, and the nation has been prosperous.

Under this Constitution our commerce has been wisely regulated with foreign nations and between the States; new States have been admitted into our Union; our territory has been enlarged by fair and honorable treaty, and with great advantage to the original States; the States, respectively protected by the National Government under a mild, parental system against foreign dangers, and enjoying within their separate spheres, by a wise partition of power, a just proportion of the sovereignty, have improved their police, extended their settlements, and attained a strength and maturity which are the best proofs of wholesome laws well administered. And if we look to the condition of individuals what a proud spectacle does it exhibit! On whom has oppression fallen in any quarter of our Union? Who has been deprived of any right of person or property? Who restrained from offering his vows in the mode which he prefers to the Divine Author of his being? It is well known that all these blessings have been enjoyed in their fullest extent; and I add with peculiar satisfaction that there has been no example of a capital punishment being inflicted on anyone for the crime of high treason.

Under this Constitution, our trade has been effectively managed both with foreign countries and between the States; new States have joined our Union; our territory has increased through fair treaties, benefiting the original States; the States are protected by the National Government in a gentle, supportive way from foreign threats, and enjoy, within their own areas, a fair share of power through a smart division of authority. This has led to improvements in law enforcement, the expansion of settlements, and a strength and maturity that demonstrate the effectiveness of good laws in practice. If we consider the condition of individuals, what a proud picture this paints! Who has faced oppression anywhere in our Union? Who has been denied any personal or property rights? Who has been prevented from expressing their beliefs in the way they choose to the Creator of their existence? It's well known that all these blessings have been fully enjoyed, and I am especially pleased to note that there has been no instance of anyone receiving the death penalty for high treason.

Some who might admit the competency of our Government to these beneficent duties might doubt it in trials which put to the test its strength and efficiency as a member of the great community of nations. Here too experience has afforded us the most satisfactory proof in its favor. Just as this Constitution was put into action several of the principal States of Europe had become much agitated and some of them seriously convulsed. Destructive wars ensued, which have of late only been terminated. In the course of these conflicts the United States received great injury from several of the parties. It was their interest to stand aloof from the contest, to demand justice from the party committing the injury, and to cultivate by a fair and honorable conduct the friendship of all. War became at length inevitable, and the result has shown that our Government is equal to that, the greatest of trials, under the most unfavorable circumstances. Of the virtue of the people and of the heroic exploits of the Army, the Navy, and the militia I need not speak.

Some who might acknowledge our Government's ability to handle these beneficial tasks may question it in situations that challenge its strength and effectiveness as part of the global community. Here, too, experience has provided us with solid evidence in its favor. When this Constitution was implemented, several major European States were in turmoil, with some experiencing serious upheaval. Destructive wars followed, which have only recently come to an end. During these conflicts, the United States suffered significant harm from various parties. It was in our interest to remain neutral, seek justice from those causing the harm, and nurture friendships with all through fair and honorable actions. Eventually, war became unavoidable, and the outcome has shown that our Government can withstand this greatest of challenges, even in the toughest circumstances. I don't need to elaborate on the virtues of the people or the heroic deeds of the Army, Navy, and militia.

Such, then, is the happy Government under which we live—a Government adequate to every purpose for which the social compact is formed; a Government elective in all its branches, under which every citizen may by his merit obtain the highest trust recognized by the Constitution; which contains within it no cause of discord, none to put at variance one portion of the community with another; a Government which protects every citizen in the full enjoyment of his rights, and is able to protect the nation against injustice from foreign powers.

Such is the happy government we live under—a government that is suitable for every purpose of the social contract; a government elected in all its branches, where every citizen can achieve the highest office recognized by the Constitution based on merit; a government that harbors no causes of conflict, that doesn’t set one part of the community against another; a government that safeguards every citizen's rights and effectively defends the nation against injustices from foreign powers.

Other considerations of the highest importance admonish us to cherish our Union and to cling to the Government which supports it. Fortunate as we are in our political institutions, we have not been less so in other circumstances on which our prosperity and happiness essentially depend. Situated within the temperate zone, and extending through many degrees of latitude along the Atlantic, the United States enjoy all the varieties of climate, and every production incident to that portion of the globe. Penetrating internally to the Great Lakes and beyond the sources of the great rivers which communicate through our whole interior, no country was ever happier with respect to its domain. Blessed, too, with a fertile soil, our produce has always been very abundant, leaving, even in years the least favorable, a surplus for the wants of our fellow-men in other countries. Such is our peculiar felicity that there is not a part of our Union that is not particularly interested in preserving it. The great agricultural interest of the nation prospers under its protection. Local interests are not less fostered by it. Our fellow-citizens of the North engaged in navigation find great encouragement in being made the favored carriers of the vast productions of the other portions of the United States, while the inhabitants of these are amply recompensed, in their turn, by the nursery for seamen and naval force thus formed and reared up for the support of our common rights. Our manufactures find a generous encouragement by the policy which patronizes domestic industry, and the surplus of our produce a steady and profitable market by local wants in less-favored parts at home.

Other important factors remind us to value our Union and stay loyal to the Government that upholds it. As fortunate as we are with our political systems, we’re also lucky in other aspects that are essential to our prosperity and happiness. Located within the temperate zone and stretching across various latitudes along the Atlantic, the United States benefits from a wide range of climates and every type of product typical of that part of the world. With access to the Great Lakes and beyond the sources of major rivers that connect our entire interior, no country has ever been happier regarding its territory. Blessed with fertile soil, our crops have always been abundant, providing even in the least favorable years a surplus to help our fellow humans in other countries. Such is our unique fortune that there is no part of our Union that isn’t particularly invested in preserving it. The nation's large agricultural sector thrives under its protection. Local interests benefit just as much. Our fellow citizens in the North, involved in shipping, find significant support in being the preferred carriers of the vast products from other parts of the United States, while those in these areas are well compensated in return by the training ground for sailors and naval forces thus formed to defend our shared rights. Our manufacturing sector receives strong support from policies that promote domestic industry, and the surplus of our crops finds a steady and profitable market due to local needs in less-favored areas at home.

Such, then, being the highly favored condition of our country, it is the interest of every citizen to maintain it. What are the dangers which menace us? If any exist they ought to be ascertained and guarded against.

Given the fortunate state of our country, it's in the best interest of every citizen to protect it. What are the threats we face? If there are any, we need to identify and prepare for them.

In explaining my sentiments on this subject it may be asked, What raised us to the present happy state? How did we accomplish the Revolution? How remedy the defects of the first instrument of our Union, by infusing into the National Government sufficient power for national purposes, without impairing the just rights of the States or affecting those of individuals? How sustain and pass with glory through the late war? The Government has been in the hands of the people. To the people, therefore, and to the faithful and able depositaries of their trust is the credit due. Had the people of the United States been educated in different principles had they been less intelligent, less independent, or less virtuous can it be believed that we should have maintained the same steady and consistent career or been blessed with the same success? While, then, the constituent body retains its present sound and healthful state everything will be safe. They will choose competent and faithful representatives for every department. It is only when the people become ignorant and corrupt, when they degenerate into a populace, that they are incapable of exercising the sovereignty. Usurpation is then an easy attainment, and an usurper soon found. The people themselves become the willing instruments of their own debasement and ruin. Let us, then, look to the great cause, and endeavor to preserve it in full force. Let us by all wise and constitutional measures promote intelligence among the people as the best means of preserving our liberties.

As I share my thoughts on this topic, one might wonder, what brought us to our current happy state? How did we achieve the Revolution? How did we fix the problems of our first agreement by giving the National Government enough power for national needs without compromising the rights of the States or individuals? How did we endure and emerge victorious from the recent war? The Government has been in the hands of the people. Therefore, the credit goes to the people and the loyal and capable guardians of their trust. If the people of the United States had been raised with different principles—if they had been less educated, less independent, or less virtuous—can we believe that we would have followed the same steady path or enjoyed the same success? As long as the core group remains in a healthy and strong state, everything will be secure. They will elect skilled and trustworthy representatives for every area. It is only when the people become ignorant and corrupt, when they turn into a crowd, that they lose the ability to exercise their sovereignty. Then, taking over becomes easy, and a usurper quickly emerges. The people themselves become willing tools of their own decline and destruction. So, let’s focus on the bigger picture and strive to keep it strong. Let’s, through wise and lawful actions, promote education among the people as the best way to protect our freedoms.

Dangers from abroad are not less deserving of attention. Experiencing the fortune of other nations, the United States may be again involved in war, and it may in that event be the object of the adverse party to overset our Government, to break our Union, and demolish us as a nation. Our distance from Europe and the just, moderate, and pacific policy of our Government may form some security against these dangers, but they ought to be anticipated and guarded against. Many of our citizens are engaged in commerce and navigation, and all of them are in a certain degree dependent on their prosperous state. Many are engaged in the fisheries. These interests are exposed to invasion in the wars between other powers, and we should disregard the faithful admonition of experience if we did not expect it. We must support our rights or lose our character, and with it, perhaps, our liberties. A people who fail to do it can scarcely be said to hold a place among independent nations. National honor is national property of the highest value. The sentiment in the mind of every citizen is national strength. It ought therefore to be cherished.

Dangers from abroad are equally worthy of attention. Experiencing the circumstances of other nations, the United States could find itself involved in war again, and in that case, the opposing side might aim to undermine our Government, disrupt our Union, and destroy us as a nation. Our geographical distance from Europe and the fair, moderate, and peaceful approach of our Government might provide some protection against these threats, but we should still anticipate and prepare for them. Many of our citizens work in commerce and navigation, and all of them are somewhat reliant on its success. A lot are involved in fishing. These interests can be threatened during conflicts between other nations, and we would ignore the valuable lessons of history if we didn’t expect this. We must defend our rights or risk losing our reputation, and possibly our freedoms too. A people who fail to do this can hardly be considered part of independent nations. National honor is the nation's most valuable asset. The belief in the minds of every citizen is the strength of the nation. Therefore, it should be nurtured.

To secure us against these dangers our coast and inland frontiers should be fortified, our Army and Navy, regulated upon just principles as to the force of each, be kept in perfect order, and our militia be placed on the best practicable footing. To put our extensive coast in such a state of defense as to secure our cities and interior from invasion will be attended with expense, but the work when finished will be permanent, and it is fair to presume that a single campaign of invasion by a naval force superior to our own, aided by a few thousand land troops, would expose us to greater expense, without taking into the estimate the loss of property and distress of our citizens, than would be sufficient for this great work. Our land and naval forces should be moderate, but adequate to the necessary purposes—the former to garrison and preserve our fortifications and to meet the first invasions of a foreign foe, and, while constituting the elements of a greater force, to preserve the science as well as all the necessary implements of war in a state to be brought into activity in the event of war; the latter, retained within the limits proper in a state of peace, might aid in maintaining the neutrality of the United States with dignity in the wars of other powers and in saving the property of their citizens from spoliation. In time of war, with the enlargement of which the great naval resources of the country render it susceptible, and which should be duly fostered in time of peace, it would contribute essentially, both as an auxiliary of defense and as a powerful engine of annoyance, to diminish the calamities of war and to bring the war to a speedy and honorable termination.

To protect us from these dangers, we should strengthen our coast and inland borders, keep our Army and Navy well-regulated and in top shape, and improve our militia to the best possible standard. Establishing strong defenses along our extensive coastline to ensure our cities and interior are safe from invasion will require funding, but once completed, these defenses will be lasting. It's reasonable to assume that a single invasion campaign by a foreign naval force stronger than ours, supported by a few thousand ground troops, would cost us even more—not to mention the damage to property and the hardships faced by our citizens—than what we would spend on these defenses. Our land and naval forces should be balanced, sufficient for their intended purposes: the land forces should man our fortifications and respond to initial foreign attacks while also maintaining the skills and equipment needed for war readiness; the naval forces, within reasonable limits during peacetime, can help uphold the U.S. neutrality with respect and protect our citizens' property from being plundered. In wartime, leveraging the country’s significant naval capabilities, which should be nurtured during peacetime, would greatly assist in defense and serve as a strong deterrent to mitigate the nightmares of war, leading to a swift and honorable resolution.

But it ought always to be held prominently in view that the safety of these States and of everything dear to a free people must depend in an eminent degree on the militia. Invasions may be made too formidable to be resisted by any land and naval force which it would comport either with the principles of our Government or the circumstances of the United States to maintain. In such cases recourse must be had to the great body of the people, and in a manner to produce the best effect. It is of the highest importance, therefore, that they be so organized and trained as to be prepared for any emergency. The arrangement should be such as to put at the command of the Government the ardent patriotism and youthful vigor of the country. If formed on equal and just principles, it can not be oppressive. It is the crisis which makes the pressure, and not the laws which provide a remedy for it. This arrangement should be formed, too, in time of peace, to be the better prepared for war. With such an organization of such a people the United States have nothing to dread from foreign invasion. At its approach an overwhelming force of gallant men might always be put in motion.

But it should always be kept in mind that the safety of these States and everything precious to a free society relies heavily on the militia. Invasions could become too overwhelming to be resisted by any land or naval force that would align with the principles of our Government or the situation of the United States. In such cases, we must turn to the larger population, organizing them in a way that is most effective. Therefore, it's extremely important that they are organized and trained to be ready for any emergency. The setup should enable the Government to harness the passionate patriotism and youthful energy of the country. If it's built on fair and just principles, it won’t be oppressive. It's the situation that creates the urgency, not the laws that provide a solution for it. This organization should also be established in peacetime so that we are better prepared for war. With a well-organized populace, the United States has nothing to fear from foreign invasions. When faced with such a threat, a strong force of brave individuals could always be mobilized.

Other interests of high importance will claim attention, among which the improvement of our country by roads and canals, proceeding always with a constitutional sanction, holds a distinguished place. By thus facilitating the intercourse between the States we shall add much to the convenience and comfort of our fellow-citizens, much to the ornament of the country, and, what is of greater importance, we shall shorten distances, and, by making each part more accessible to and dependent on the other, we shall bind the Union more closely together. Nature has done so much for us by intersecting the country with so many great rivers, bays, and lakes, approaching from distant points so near to each other, that the inducement to complete the work seems to be peculiarly strong. A more interesting spectacle was perhaps never seen than is exhibited within the limits of the United States—a territory so vast and advantageously situated, containing objects so grand, so useful, so happily connected in all their parts!

Other important interests will demand attention, among which improving our country through roads and canals, always with constitutional approval, stands out. By making it easier for the States to connect, we will greatly enhance the convenience and comfort of our fellow citizens, beautify the country, and, most importantly, reduce distances. By making each area more accessible and interdependent, we will strengthen the Union. Nature has already done a lot for us by crisscrossing the country with so many great rivers, bays, and lakes that are relatively close to each other, making the need to complete this work particularly compelling. There’s perhaps no more fascinating sight than what exists within the boundaries of the United States—a vast and well-situated territory containing remarkable, useful features that are all well-connected!

Our manufacturers will likewise require the systematic and fostering care of the Government. Possessing as we do all the raw materials, the fruit of our own soil and industry, we ought not to depend in the degree we have done on supplies from other countries. While we are thus dependent the sudden event of war, unsought and unexpected, can not fail to plunge us into the most serious difficulties. It is important, too, that the capital which nourishes our manufacturers should be domestic, as its influence in that case instead of exhausting, as it may do in foreign hands, would be felt advantageously on agriculture and every other branch of industry. Equally important is it to provide at home a market for our raw materials, as by extending the competition it will enhance the price and protect the cultivator against the casualties incident to foreign markets.

Our manufacturers will also need the organized and supportive care of the Government. Since we have all the raw materials from our own land and industry, we shouldn't rely as much as we have on supplies from other countries. While we remain dependent, an unexpected war can throw us into serious trouble. It's also crucial that the capital supporting our manufacturers comes from within the country, as this will positively impact agriculture and other industries instead of draining resources, which can happen when the money is in foreign hands. Additionally, it's vital to create a local market for our raw materials; by increasing competition, we can raise prices and protect farmers from the risks associated with foreign markets.

With the Indian tribes it is our duty to cultivate friendly relations and to act with kindness and liberality in all our transactions. Equally proper is it to persevere in our efforts to extend to them the advantages of civilization.

With the Indian tribes, it's our responsibility to build friendly relationships and to be kind and generous in all our dealings. It's also important to keep working to provide them with the benefits of civilization.

The great amount of our revenue and the flourishing state of the Treasury are a full proof of the competency of the national resources for any emergency, as they are of the willingness of our fellow-citizens to bear the burdens which the public necessities require. The vast amount of vacant lands, the value of which daily augments, forms an additional resource of great extent and duration. These resources, besides accomplishing every other necessary purpose, put it completely in the power of the United States to discharge the national debt at an early period. Peace is the best time for improvement and preparation of every kind; it is in peace that our commerce flourishes most, that taxes are most easily paid, and that the revenue is most productive.

The large amount of our revenue and the thriving state of the Treasury clearly show that our national resources are more than capable of handling any emergency, as they reflect our fellow citizens' willingness to shoulder the burdens that public needs require. The significant amount of vacant land, which increases in value every day, provides an additional extensive and lasting resource. These resources not only serve every other necessary purpose but also enable the United States to pay off the national debt sooner rather than later. Peace is the best time for improvement and preparation of all kinds; it's during peace that our commerce thrives the most, taxes are paid most easily, and revenue is at its highest.

The Executive is charged officially in the Departments under it with the disbursement of the public money, and is responsible for the faithful application of it to the purposes for which it is raised. The Legislature is the watchful guardian over the public purse. It is its duty to see that the disbursement has been honestly made. To meet the requisite responsibility every facility should be afforded to the Executive to enable it to bring the public agents intrusted with the public money strictly and promptly to account. Nothing should be presumed against them; but if, with the requisite facilities, the public money is suffered to lie long and uselessly in their hands, they will not be the only defaulters, nor will the demoralizing effect be confined to them. It will evince a relaxation and want of tone in the Administration which will be felt by the whole community. I shall do all I can to secure economy and fidelity in this important branch of the Administration, and I doubt not that the Legislature will perform its duty with equal zeal. A thorough examination should be regularly made, and I will promote it.

The Executive is officially responsible for handling the public funds in its departments and is accountable for ensuring that the money is used for its intended purposes. The Legislature acts as a vigilant protector of public finances. It's their job to ensure that the funds are dispersed honestly. To meet this important responsibility, the Executive should have every opportunity to hold public officials who manage the public funds accountable without delay. Nothing should be assumed against them; however, if the public money is allowed to sit unused in their possession, they won't be the only ones at fault, and the negative impact will affect everyone. This will show a lack of discipline and effectiveness in the Administration that will resonate throughout the community. I will do everything I can to ensure efficiency and integrity in this vital area of governance, and I trust that the Legislature will fulfill its responsibilities with equal commitment. Regular thorough reviews should be conducted, and I will advocate for this.

It is particularly gratifying to me to enter on the discharge of these duties at a time when the United States are blessed with peace. It is a state most consistent with their prosperity and happiness. It will be my sincere desire to preserve it, so far as depends on the Executive, on just principles with all nations, claiming nothing unreasonable of any and rendering to each what is its due.

I'm especially pleased to take on these responsibilities at a time when the United States is enjoying peace. This situation aligns well with our prosperity and happiness. I genuinely hope to maintain it, as much as the Executive can, based on fair principles with all nations, asking for nothing unreasonable from anyone and giving each what they deserve.

Equally gratifying is it to witness the increased harmony of opinion which pervades our Union. Discord does not belong to our system. Union is recommended as well by the free and benign principles of our Government, extending its blessings to every individual, as by the other eminent advantages attending it. The American people have encountered together great dangers and sustained severe trials with success. They constitute one great family with a common interest. Experience has enlightened us on some questions of essential importance to the country. The progress has been slow, dictated by a just reflection and a faithful regard to every interest connected with it. To promote this harmony in accord with the principles of our republican Government and in a manner to give them the most complete effect, and to advance in all other respects the best interests of our Union, will be the object of my constant and zealous exertions.

It’s equally rewarding to see the growing agreement among our nation. Conflict has no place in our system. Unity is encouraged not only by the fair and kind principles of our Government, which offer benefits to every person, but also by the other significant advantages that come with it. The American people have faced great dangers and overcome serious challenges together. We are one big family with shared interests. Our experiences have taught us important lessons about the country. Progress has been gradual, guided by careful thought and a genuine concern for all related interests. My goal will be to foster this harmony in line with the principles of our democratic Government, ensuring they are fully realized, while also promoting the best interests of our Union in every way possible.

Never did a government commence under auspices so favorable, nor ever was success so complete. If we look to the history of other nations, ancient or modern, we find no example of a growth so rapid, so gigantic, of a people so prosperous and happy. In contemplating what we have still to perform, the heart of every citizen must expand with joy when he reflects how near our Government has approached to perfection; that in respect to it we have no essential improvement to make; that the great object is to preserve it in the essential principles and features which characterize it, and that is to be done by preserving the virtue and enlightening the minds of the people; and as a security against foreign dangers to adopt such arrangements as are indispensable to the support of our independence, our rights and liberties. If we persevere in the career in which we have advanced so far and in the path already traced, we can not fail, under the favor of a gracious Providence, to attain the high destiny which seems to await us.

Never has a government begun under such favorable circumstances, nor has there ever been such complete success. If we look at the history of other nations, both ancient and modern, we find no example of such rapid, colossal growth of a people who are so prosperous and happy. As we think about what we still need to accomplish, every citizen's heart should swell with joy when realizing how close our government is to perfection; that regarding it, we have no significant improvements to make; that the main goal is to maintain it in the essential principles and characteristics that define it, and this can be achieved by fostering virtue and educating the minds of the people. Additionally, to ensure protection against foreign threats, we must establish the necessary arrangements to support our independence, rights, and freedoms. If we persist in the path we have traveled so far and continue along the course already laid out, we will undoubtedly, with the support of a gracious Providence, reach the great future that seems to await us.

In the Administrations of the illustrious men who have preceded me in this high station, with some of whom I have been connected by the closest ties from early life, examples are presented which will always be found highly instructive and useful to their successors. From these I shall endeavor to derive all the advantages which they may afford. Of my immediate predecessor, under whom so important a portion of this great and successful experiment has been made, I shall be pardoned for expressing my earnest wishes that he may long enjoy in his retirement the affections of a grateful country, the best reward of exalted talents and the most faithful and meritorious service. Relying on the aid to be derived from the other departments of the Government, I enter on the trust to which I have been called by the suffrages of my fellow-citizens with my fervent prayers to the Almighty that He will be graciously pleased to continue to us that protection which He has already so conspicuously displayed in our favor.

In the administrations of the remarkable leaders who came before me in this prestigious role, with some of whom I have shared close relationships since childhood, there are examples that will always be valuable and insightful for their successors. I will strive to take advantage of the lessons they offer. I would like to express my sincere wishes for my immediate predecessor, under whom a significant part of this great and successful endeavor was achieved, that he may long enjoy the appreciation of a thankful nation during his retirement, which is the best reward for exceptional talent and dedicated service. Relying on the support I expect to receive from the other branches of the Government, I take on this responsibility given to me by the votes of my fellow citizens with my heartfelt prayers to the Almighty that He will continue to grant us the protection that He has already shown us so clearly.






JAMES MONROE, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 5, 1821

[Transcriber's note: In 1821, March 4 fell on a Sunday for the first time that presidential inaugurations had been observed. Although his previous term had expired on Saturday, the President waited until the following Monday upon the advice of Chief Justice Marshall, before going to the newly rebuilt Hall of the House of Representatives to take the oath of office. Because the weather was cold and wet, the ceremonies were conducted indoors. The change in the location caused some confusion and many visitors and dignitaries were unable to find a place to stand inside the building.]

[Transcriber's note: In 1821, March 4 fell on a Sunday, marking the first time presidential inaugurations were held on that date. Even though his previous term ended on Saturday, the President decided to wait until the following Monday, following Chief Justice Marshall's advice, before heading to the newly reconstructed Hall of the House of Representatives to take the oath of office. Because the weather was cold and rainy, the ceremonies took place indoors. This change in location caused some confusion, and many visitors and dignitaries couldn't find a place to stand inside the building.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

I shall not attempt to describe the grateful emotions which the new and very distinguished proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, evinced by my reelection to this high trust, has excited in my bosom. The approbation which it announces of my conduct in the preceding term affords me a consolation which I shall profoundly feel through life. The general accord with which it has been expressed adds to the great and never-ceasing obligations which it imposes. To merit the continuance of this good opinion, and to carry it with me into my retirement as the solace of advancing years, will be the object of my most zealous and unceasing efforts.

I won’t try to describe the deep gratitude I feel for the immense trust my fellow citizens have shown in me by reelecting me to this important position. The approval this signifies regarding my actions in the previous term provides me with a comfort that I will carry with me for the rest of my life. The widespread support it reflects adds to the great and ongoing responsibilities it brings. To deserve this continued trust and to take it with me into my later years as a source of comfort will be my dedicated and constant goal.

Having no pretensions to the high and commanding claims of my predecessors, whose names are so much more conspicuously identified with our Revolution, and who contributed so preeminently to promote its success, I consider myself rather as the instrument than the cause of the union which has prevailed in the late election. In surmounting, in favor of my humble pretensions, the difficulties which so often produce division in like occurrences, it is obvious that other powerful causes, indicating the great strength and stability of our Union, have essentially contributed to draw you together. That these powerful causes exist, and that they are permanent, is my fixed opinion; that they may produce a like accord in all questions touching, however remotely, the liberty, prosperity and happiness of our country will always be the object of my most fervent prayers to the Supreme Author of All Good.

Not thinking I have the same high and impressive status as my predecessors, whose names are much more closely linked to our Revolution and who played a key role in its success, I see myself more as a tool than the reason for the unity that was achieved in the recent election. In overcoming the challenges that often cause division in similar situations to favor my modest aims, it's clear that other powerful factors, highlighting the great strength and stability of our Union, have significantly helped bring you together. I firmly believe that these strong factors exist and are here to stay; that they may lead to similar agreement on all matters related, even indirectly, to the freedom, prosperity, and happiness of our country will always be the focus of my deepest prayers to the Supreme Author of All Good.

In a government which is founded by the people, who possess exclusively the sovereignty, it seems proper that the person who may be placed by their suffrages in this high trust should declare on commencing its duties the principles on which he intends to conduct the Administration. If the person thus elected has served the preceding term, an opportunity is afforded him to review its principal occurrences and to give such further explanation respecting them as in his judgment may be useful to his constituents. The events of one year have influence on those of another, and, in like manner, of a preceding on the succeeding Administration. The movements of a great nation are connected in all their parts. If errors have been committed they ought to be corrected; if the policy is sound it ought to be supported. It is by a thorough knowledge of the whole subject that our fellow-citizens are enabled to judge correctly of the past and to give a proper direction to the future.

In a government that’s established by the people, who hold all the power, it makes sense for the individual elected to this important role to outline the principles they plan to follow when starting their duties. If this person has previously held the position, they have a chance to review key events from their last term and provide additional context that they think could be helpful for their constituents. What happens in one year affects the next, just as a previous administration influences the one that follows. The actions of a large nation are interconnected in every way. If mistakes have been made, they should be corrected; if the current policy is effective, it should be upheld. With a comprehensive understanding of the entire situation, our fellow citizens can accurately assess the past and appropriately shape the future.

Just before the commencement of the last term the United States had concluded a war with a very powerful nation on conditions equal and honorable to both parties. The events of that war are too recent and too deeply impressed on the memory of all to require a development from me. Our commerce had been in a great measure driven from the sea, our Atlantic and inland frontiers were invaded in almost every part; the waste of life along our coast and on some parts of our inland frontiers, to the defense of which our gallant and patriotic citizens were called, was immense, in addition to which not less than $120,000,000 were added at its end to the public debt.

Just before the start of the last term, the United States had finished a war with a very powerful nation on terms that were fair and respectful to both sides. The events of that war are still fresh in everyone’s mind and don't need to be explained by me. Our trade had largely been driven from the seas, our Atlantic and inland borders were invaded almost everywhere; the loss of life along our coast and in some areas of our inland borders, where our brave and patriotic citizens were called to defend, was enormous. Additionally, by the end of the war, the public debt increased by no less than $120,000,000.

As soon as the war had terminated, the nation, admonished by its events, resolved to place itself in a situation which should be better calculated to prevent the recurrence of a like evil, and, in case it should recur, to mitigate its calamities. With this view, after reducing our land force to the basis of a peace establishment, which has been further modified since, provision was made for the construction of fortifications at proper points through the whole extent of our coast and such an augmentation of our naval force as should be well adapted to both purposes. The laws making this provision were passed in 1815 and 1816, and it has been since the constant effort of the Executive to carry them into effect.

As soon as the war ended, the nation, warned by the events, decided to position itself in a way that would help prevent a similar disaster from happening again and, if it did happen, to lessen its impact. To achieve this, after reducing our land forces to a peacetime level, which has been further adjusted since, plans were made to build fortifications at key points along our entire coast and to increase our naval forces to adequately address both needs. The laws that established this were passed in 1815 and 1816, and since then, the Executive has consistently worked to implement them.

The advantage of these fortifications and of an augmented naval force in the extent contemplated, in a point of economy, has been fully illustrated by a report of the Board of Engineers and Naval Commissioners lately communicated to Congress, by which it appears that in an invasion by 20,000 men, with a correspondent naval force, in a campaign of six months only, the whole expense of the construction of the works would be defrayed by the difference in the sum necessary to maintain the force which would be adequate to our defense with the aid of those works and that which would be incurred without them. The reason of this difference is obvious. If fortifications are judiciously placed on our great inlets, as distant from our cities as circumstances will permit, they will form the only points of attack, and the enemy will be detained there by a small regular force a sufficient time to enable our militia to collect and repair to that on which the attack is made. A force adequate to the enemy, collected at that single point, with suitable preparation for such others as might be menaced, is all that would be requisite. But if there were no fortifications, then the enemy might go where he pleased, and, changing his position and sailing from place to place, our force must be called out and spread in vast numbers along the whole coast and on both sides of every bay and river as high up in each as it might be navigable for ships of war. By these fortifications, supported by our Navy, to which they would afford like support, we should present to other powers an armed front from St. Croix to the Sabine, which would protect in the event of war our whole coast and interior from invasion; and even in the wars of other powers, in which we were neutral, they would be found eminently useful, as, by keeping their public ships at a distance from our cities, peace and order in them would be preserved and the Government be protected from insult.

The benefits of these fortifications and an increased naval force, as planned, have been clearly detailed in a recent report from the Board of Engineers and Naval Commissioners shared with Congress. It shows that if there were an invasion by 20,000 troops, along with a corresponding naval force, and the campaign lasted six months, the total cost of building the fortifications would be covered by the savings from the difference in upkeep between the necessary defense force with and without these structures. The reason for this difference is clear. If the fortifications are strategically positioned at our main inlets, as far from our cities as possible, they will be the only targets for the enemy. A small regular force could hold them off long enough for our militia to gather and respond to the attack. We would only need a force strong enough to handle the enemy at that one location, while also preparing for any other threats that might arise. However, without fortifications, the enemy could move freely, shifting their positions and sailing from one place to another, forcing us to deploy our forces extensively along the entire coast and both sides of every navigable bay and river. By having these fortifications supported by our Navy, which they would also aid, we would present a united front to other nations from St. Croix to the Sabine, safeguarding our entire coast and interior from invasion in the event of war. Even during conflicts involving other nations, where we remain neutral, these fortifications would be extremely beneficial. They would help keep foreign naval ships away from our cities, maintaining peace and order and protecting the government from potential insults.

It need scarcely be remarked that these measures have not been resorted to in a spirit of hostility to other powers. Such a disposition does not exist toward any power. Peace and good will have been, and will hereafter be, cultivated with all, and by the most faithful regard to justice. They have been dictated by a love of peace, of economy, and an earnest desire to save the lives of our fellow-citizens from that destruction and our country from that devastation which are inseparable from war when it finds us unprepared for it. It is believed, and experience has shown, that such a preparation is the best expedient that can be resorted to prevent war. I add with much pleasure that considerable progress has already been made in these measures of defense, and that they will be completed in a few years, considering the great extent and importance of the object, if the plan be zealously and steadily persevered in.

It's hardly worth mentioning that these actions haven't been taken out of hostility towards other nations. There's no animosity towards any country. We have always promoted peace and goodwill with everyone, and we will continue to do so through a strong commitment to justice. These actions are driven by a desire for peace, financial responsibility, and a sincere wish to protect the lives of our fellow citizens from the destruction and devastation that come with war, especially when we're unprepared for it. It's believed, and experience has shown, that being prepared is the best way to prevent war. I'm also happy to report that substantial progress has already been made in these defense measures, and they should be completed within a few years if we commit to the plan with enthusiasm and consistency.

The conduct of the Government in what relates to foreign powers is always an object of the highest importance to the nation. Its agriculture, commerce, manufactures, fisheries, revenue, in short, its peace, may all be affected by it. Attention is therefore due to this subject.

The government's actions regarding foreign powers are always extremely important to the nation. Its agriculture, commerce, manufacturing, fishing, and overall peace can all be impacted by these actions. So, this subject deserves our attention.

At the period adverted to the powers of Europe, after having been engaged in long and destructive wars with each other, had concluded a peace, which happily still exists. Our peace with the power with whom we had been engaged had also been concluded. The war between Spain and the colonies in South America, which had commenced many years before, was then the only conflict that remained unsettled. This being a contest between different parts of the same community, in which other powers had not interfered, was not affected by their accommodations.

During the time referenced, the powers of Europe, after fighting long and destructive wars among themselves, had finally reached a peace that, fortunately, still lasts. Our peace with the power we had been engaged with was also established. The war between Spain and the colonies in South America, which had started many years earlier, was the only conflict that remained unresolved. Since this was a struggle between different parts of the same community and other powers had not intervened, it was unaffected by their agreements.

This contest was considered at an early stage by my predecessor a civil war in which the parties were entitled to equal rights in our ports. This decision, the first made by any power, being formed on great consideration of the comparative strength and resources of the parties, the length of time, and successful opposition made by the colonies, and of all other circumstances on which it ought to depend, was in strict accord with the law of nations. Congress has invariably acted on this principle, having made no change in our relations with either party. Our attitude has therefore been that of neutrality between them, which has been maintained by the Government with the strictest impartiality. No aid has been afforded to either, nor has any privilege been enjoyed by the one which has not been equally open to the other party, and every exertion has been made in its power to enforce the execution of the laws prohibiting illegal equipments with equal rigor against both.

This contest was seen early on by my predecessor as a civil war where both sides were entitled to equal rights in our ports. This decision, the first made by any power, was based on careful consideration of the relative strength and resources of the parties, the length of time and successful resistance offered by the colonies, and all other factors that should be taken into account, and it was fully in line with international law. Congress has consistently operated on this principle, making no changes in our relations with either side. Thus, our stance has been one of neutrality between them, which the Government has upheld with the utmost fairness. No support has been provided to either side, nor has either party benefited from privileges not equally available to the other, and every effort has been made to strictly enforce the laws against illegal equipment with equal rigor directed at both.

By this equality between the parties their public vessels have been received in our ports on the same footing; they have enjoyed an equal right to purchase and export arms, munitions of war, and every other supply, the exportation of all articles whatever being permitted under laws which were passed long before the commencement of the contest; our citizens have traded equally with both, and their commerce with each has been alike protected by the Government.

By treating both sides equally, their public ships have been allowed into our ports on the same terms; they have had the same right to buy and export weapons, military supplies, and any other goods, with the export of all items being permitted under laws that were established long before the conflict started; our citizens have traded fairly with both sides, and their trade with each has been equally protected by the Government.

Respecting the attitude which it may be proper for the United States to maintain hereafter between the parties, I have no hesitation in stating it as my opinion that the neutrality heretofore observed should still be adhered to. From the change in the Government of Spain and the negotiation now depending, invited by the Cortes and accepted by the colonies, it may be presumed, that their differences will be settled on the terms proposed by the colonies. Should the war be continued, the United States, regarding its occurrences, will always have it in their power to adopt such measures respecting it as their honor and interest may require.

Respecting the position that the United States should maintain between the parties in the future, I confidently express my belief that we should continue to uphold the neutrality we have followed so far. Given the change in the Spanish Government and the negotiations currently underway, which were initiated by the Cortes and accepted by the colonies, it seems likely that their differences will be resolved based on the terms proposed by the colonies. If the war continues, the United States will always have the ability to take whatever actions are necessary in accordance with our honor and interests.

Shortly after the general peace a band of adventurers took advantage of this conflict and of the facility which it afforded to establish a system of buccaneering in the neighboring seas, to the great annoyance of the commerce of the United States, and, as was represented, of that of other powers. Of this spirit and of its injurious bearing on the United States strong proofs were afforded by the establishment at Amelia Island, and the purposes to which it was made instrumental by this band in 1817, and by the occurrences which took place in other parts of Florida in 1818, the details of which in both instances are too well known to require to be now recited. I am satisfied had a less decisive course been adopted that the worst consequences would have resulted from it. We have seen that these checks, decisive as they were, were not sufficient to crush that piratical spirit. Many culprits brought within our limits have been condemned to suffer death, the punishment due to that atrocious crime. The decisions of upright and enlightened tribunals fall equally on all whose crimes subject them, by a fair interpretation of the law, to its censure. It belongs to the Executive not to suffer the executions under these decisions to transcend the great purpose for which punishment is necessary. The full benefit of example being secured, policy as well as humanity equally forbids that they should be carried further. I have acted on this principle, pardoning those who appear to have been led astray by ignorance of the criminality of the acts they had committed, and suffering the law to take effect on those only in whose favor no extenuating circumstances could be urged.

Shortly after the general peace, a group of adventurers took advantage of the conflict and the opportunities it created to set up a system of piracy in the nearby seas, which greatly annoyed the commerce of the United States and, as reported, that of other powers as well. This hostile spirit and its harmful impact on the United States were clearly demonstrated by the situation at Amelia Island and the ways this group used it in 1817, along with the events that occurred in other parts of Florida in 1818, the details of which are too well-known to need repeating. I am convinced that if a less decisive approach had been taken, the worst consequences would have followed. We have seen that these actions, as decisive as they were, were not enough to eliminate that piratical spirit. Many offenders brought within our borders have been sentenced to death, the punishment warranted by such a horrific crime. The decisions of honest and fair courts apply equally to anyone whose crimes merit punishment under a fair interpretation of the law. It is the Executive's duty not to let the executions under these decisions go beyond the main reason why punishment is necessary. Once the intended lesson has been taught, both policy and compassion demand that punishment not go any further. I have followed this principle, pardoning those who seem to have been misguided by ignorance of the criminality of their actions, and allowing the law to be enforced only on those against whom no mitigating circumstances could be argued.

Great confidence is entertained that the late treaty with Spain, which has been ratified by both the parties, and the ratifications whereof have been exchanged, has placed the relations of the two countries on a basis of permanent friendship. The provision made by it for such of our citizens as have claims on Spain of the character described will, it is presumed, be very satisfactory to them, and the boundary which is established between the territories of the parties westward of the Mississippi, heretofore in dispute, has, it is thought, been settled on conditions just and advantageous to both. But to the acquisition of Florida too much importance can not be attached. It secures to the United States a territory important in itself, and whose importance is much increased by its bearing on many of the highest interests of the Union. It opens to several of the neighboring States a free passage to the ocean, through the Province ceded, by several rivers, having their sources high up within their limits. It secures us against all future annoyance from powerful Indian tribes. It gives us several excellent harbors in the Gulf of Mexico for ships of war of the largest size. It covers by its position in the Gulf the Mississippi and other great waters within our extended limits, and thereby enables the United States to afford complete protection to the vast and very valuable productions of our whole Western country, which find a market through those streams.

There is great confidence that the recent treaty with Spain, which has been approved by both parties and whose ratifications have been exchanged, has established a foundation of lasting friendship between the two countries. The provisions made for our citizens who have claims against Spain will likely be very satisfactory to them, and the boundary agreed upon between the territories of the parties west of the Mississippi, which was previously in dispute, is believed to have been settled on fair and beneficial terms for both sides. However, we shouldn't overstate the importance of acquiring Florida. It secures a territory that is significant on its own, and its importance is greatly enhanced by its connection to many of the Union's key interests. It provides several neighboring states with an unobstructed route to the ocean through the ceded province via various rivers that have their sources well within their boundaries. It protects us from future disturbances by powerful Indian tribes. It also gives us several excellent harbors in the Gulf of Mexico that can accommodate the largest warships. Its strategic position in the Gulf safeguards the Mississippi and other major waterways within our extended borders, allowing the United States to fully protect the vast and incredibly valuable resources of our entire Western region, which are exported through these rivers.

By a treaty with the British Government, bearing date on the 20th of October, 1818, the convention regulating the commerce between the United States and Great Britain, concluded on the 3d of July, 1815, which was about expiring, was revived and continued for the term of ten years from the time of its expiration. By that treaty, also, the differences which had arisen under the treaty of Ghent respecting the right claimed by the United States for their citizens to take and cure fish on the coast of His Britannic Majesty's dominions in America, with other differences on important interests, were adjusted to the satisfaction of both parties. No agreement has yet been entered into respecting the commerce between the United States and the British dominions in the West Indies and on this continent. The restraints imposed on that commerce by Great Britain, and reciprocated by the United States on a principle of defense, continue still in force.

Through a treaty with the British Government dated October 20, 1818, the agreement regulating trade between the United States and Great Britain, which was set to expire soon, was renewed for another ten years from the expiration date. This treaty also resolved the issues that had come up under the Treaty of Ghent regarding the rights claimed by the United States for its citizens to fish and process fish along the coast of British territories in America, along with other important matters, to the satisfaction of both sides. However, no agreement has yet been made regarding trade between the United States and British territories in the West Indies and on this continent. The restrictions imposed on that trade by Great Britain, which the United States has reciprocated based on a defensive principle, are still in effect.

The negotiation with France for the regulation of the commercial relations between the two countries, which in the course of the last summer had been commenced at Paris, has since been transferred to this city, and will be pursued on the part of the United States in the spirit of conciliation, and with an earnest desire that it may terminate in an arrangement satisfactory to both parties.

The discussions with France about regulating trade between the two countries, which started in Paris last summer, have now moved to this city. The United States aims to approach these negotiations with a conciliatory attitude and a genuine hope that they will lead to a mutually satisfactory agreement.

Our relations with the Barbary Powers are preserved in the same state and by the same means that were employed when I came into this office. As early as 1801 it was found necessary to send a squadron into the Mediterranean for the protection of our commerce and no period has intervened, a short term excepted, when it was thought advisable to withdraw it. The great interests which the United States have in the Pacific, in commerce and in the fisheries, have also made it necessary to maintain a naval force there. In disposing of this force in both instances the most effectual measures in our power have been taken, without interfering with its other duties, for the suppression of the slave trade and of piracy in the neighboring seas.

Our relationship with the Barbary Powers is maintained in the same way it was when I took this office. As early as 1801, it became necessary to send a squadron to the Mediterranean to protect our trade, and there hasn’t been a time, except for a brief period, when it was considered wise to pull it back. The significant interests that the United States has in the Pacific, particularly in trade and fishing, have also made it essential to keep a naval presence there. In managing this force in both cases, we’ve taken the most effective actions possible without interfering with its other responsibilities regarding the suppression of the slave trade and piracy in the surrounding waters.

The situation of the United States in regard to their resources, the extent of their revenue, and the facility with which it is raised affords a most gratifying spectacle. The payment of nearly $67,000,000 of the public debt, with the great progress made in measures of defense and in other improvements of various kinds since the late war, are conclusive proofs of this extraordinary prosperity, especially when it is recollected that these expenditures have been defrayed without a burthen on the people, the direct tax and excise having been repealed soon after the conclusion of the late war, and the revenue applied to these great objects having been raised in a manner not to be felt. Our great resources therefore remain untouched for any purpose which may affect the vital interests of the nation. For all such purposes they are inexhaustible. They are more especially to be found in the virtue, patriotism, and intelligence of our fellow-citizens, and in the devotion with which they would yield up by any just measure of taxation all their property in support of the rights and honor of their country.

The situation of the United States regarding its resources, the size of its revenue, and how easily it’s raised is truly impressive. The payment of nearly $67,000,000 of the public debt, along with the significant progress made in defense measures and various other improvements since the recent war, clearly demonstrate this remarkable prosperity, especially considering that these expenses have been covered without burdening the people, as the direct tax and excise were removed shortly after the war ended, and the revenue used for these important initiatives was raised in a way that didn’t feel heavy. Our vast resources thus remain available for any issues that might impact the vital interests of the nation. For all such purposes, they are limitless. These resources are particularly found in the virtue, patriotism, and intelligence of our fellow citizens, and in their willingness to contribute through any fair means of taxation all their assets to support the rights and honor of their country.

Under the present depression of prices, affecting all the productions of the country and every branch of industry, proceeding from causes explained on a former occasion, the revenue has considerably diminished, the effect of which has been to compel Congress either to abandon these great measures of defense or to resort to loans or internal taxes to supply the deficiency. On the presumption that this depression and the deficiency in the revenue arising from it would be temporary, loans were authorized for the demands of the last and present year. Anxious to relieve my fellow-citizens in 1817 from every burthen which could be dispensed with and the state of the Treasury permitting it, I recommended the repeal of the internal taxes, knowing that such relief was then peculiarly necessary in consequence of the great exertions made in the late war. I made that recommendation under a pledge that should the public exigencies require a recurrence to them at any time while I remained in this trust, I would with equal promptitude perform the duty which would then be alike incumbent on me. By the experiment now making it will be seen by the next session of Congress whether the revenue shall have been so augmented as to be adequate to all these necessary purposes. Should the deficiency still continue, and especially should it be probable that it would be permanent, the course to be pursued appears to me to be obvious. I am satisfied that under certain circumstances loans may be resorted to with great advantage. I am equally well satisfied, as a general rule, that the demands of the current year, especially in time of peace, should be provided for by the revenue of that year.

Given the current drop in prices, affecting all sectors of the economy and every industry, which results from the reasons discussed earlier, the revenue has significantly decreased. This situation has forced Congress to either abandon important defense measures or turn to loans or internal taxes to cover the shortfall. Assuming that this decline and the resulting revenue shortfall would be temporary, loans were approved for the needs of the last and current year. Eager to relieve my fellow citizens in 1817 of any burdens that could be avoided, and with the Treasury in a position to do so, I suggested eliminating internal taxes, knowing that such relief was especially necessary due to the significant efforts made during the recent war. I made this suggestion with a commitment that if the public needs required us to reinstate those taxes while I held this position, I would promptly fulfill that responsibility. Through the current trial, we'll find out by the next session of Congress whether the revenue has increased enough to meet all these essential needs. If the shortfall continues, and particularly if it seems likely to be permanent, the path forward seems clear to me. I believe that under certain conditions, borrowing can be very beneficial. Generally, though, I am convinced that the expenses of the current year, especially in peacetime, should be covered by that year's revenue.

I have never dreaded, nor have I ever shunned, in any situation in which I have been placed making appeals to the virtue and patriotism of my fellow-citizens, well knowing that they could never be made in vain, especially in times of great emergency or for purposes of high national importance. Independently of the exigency of the case, many considerations of great weight urge a policy having in view a provision of revenue to meet to a certain extent the demands of the nation, without relying altogether on the precarious resource of foreign commerce. I am satisfied that internal duties and excises, with corresponding imposts on foreign articles of the same kind, would, without imposing any serious burdens on the people, enhance the price of produce, promote our manufactures, and augment the revenue, at the same time that they made it more secure and permanent.

I have never feared or avoided, in any situation I found myself in, appealing to the virtue and patriotism of my fellow citizens, fully aware that these appeals would never be in vain, especially during times of great emergency or for crucial national purposes. Regardless of the urgency of the situation, many important factors support a policy aimed at generating revenue to partially meet the country's needs, without solely depending on the uncertain resource of foreign trade. I believe that domestic duties and taxes, along with similar tariffs on foreign goods, would increase prices for products, boost our industries, and raise revenue, while also making it more stable and reliable.

The care of the Indian tribes within our limits has long been an essential part of our system, but, unfortunately, it has not been executed in a manner to accomplish all the objects intended by it. We have treated them as independent nations, without their having any substantial pretensions to that rank. The distinction has flattered their pride, retarded their improvement, and in many instances paved the way to their destruction. The progress of our settlements westward, supported as they are by a dense population, has constantly driven them back, with almost the total sacrifice of the lands which they have been compelled to abandon. They have claims on the magnanimity and, I may add, on the justice of this nation which we must all feel. We should become their real benefactors; we should perform the office of their Great Father, the endearing title which they emphatically give to the Chief Magistrate of our Union. Their sovereignty over vast territories should cease, in lieu of which the right of soil should be secured to each individual and his posterity in competent portions; and for the territory thus ceded by each tribe some reasonable equivalent should be granted, to be vested in permanent funds for the support of civil government over them and for the education of their children, for their instruction in the arts of husbandry, and to provide sustenance for them until they could provide it for themselves. My earnest hope is that Congress will digest some plan, founded on these principles, with such improvements as their wisdom may suggest, and carry it into effect as soon as it may be practicable.

Caring for the Indian tribes within our borders has long been a crucial part of our system, but unfortunately, it hasn't been carried out in a way that achieves all the goals we intended. We’ve treated them like independent nations, despite the fact that they don’t actually have real claims to that status. This distinction has inflated their pride, hindered their progress, and in many cases, has led to their demise. Our settlements have moved westward, backed by a large population, which has continuously pushed them back, resulting in the near-total loss of the land they’ve been forced to leave behind. They have legitimate expectations of generosity and, I dare say, justice from this nation that we must all recognize. We should become their true benefactors; we need to take on the role of their Great Father, the affectionate title they give to the Chief Magistrate of our Union. Their control over vast territories should end, and in exchange, individual rights to land should be secured for each person and their descendants in adequate portions; for the land ceded by each tribe, a reasonable compensation should be provided, to be invested in lasting funds for supporting governance over them and for educating their children, teaching them agricultural skills, and ensuring they have sustenance until they can sustain themselves. My sincere hope is that Congress will come up with a plan based on these principles, with any improvements their wisdom may suggest, and implement it as soon as possible.

Europe is again unsettled and the prospect of war increasing. Should the flame light up in any quarter, how far it may extend it is impossible to foresee. It is our peculiar felicity to be altogether unconnected with the causes which produce this menacing aspect elsewhere. With every power we are in perfect amity, and it is our interest to remain so if it be practicable on just conditions. I see no reasonable cause to apprehend variance with any power, unless it proceed from a violation of our maritime rights. In these contests, should they occur, and to whatever extent they may be carried, we shall be neutral; but as a neutral power we have rights which it is our duty to maintain. For like injuries it will be incumbent on us to seek redress in a spirit of amity, in full confidence that, injuring none, none would knowingly injure us. For more imminent dangers we should be prepared, and it should always be recollected that such preparation adapted to the circumstances and sanctioned by the judgment and wishes of our constituents can not fail to have a good effect in averting dangers of every kind. We should recollect also that the season of peace is best adapted to these preparations.

Europe is once again unstable, and the threat of war is growing. If a conflict breaks out anywhere, it's impossible to predict how far it might spread. Fortunately, we are completely disconnected from the issues causing this threatening situation elsewhere. We maintain friendly relations with every power, and it's in our best interest to keep it that way, as long as it's reasonable. I don’t see any valid reason to worry about conflicts with any power unless it results from a breach of our maritime rights. In the event of such conflicts, regardless of their scale, we will remain neutral; however, as a neutral power, we have rights that we must uphold. If we face similar injuries, we should seek resolution in a friendly manner, confident that by harming no one, no one would purposely harm us. We need to be ready for more immediate dangers, keeping in mind that preparations suited to the situation and approved by our constituents will effectively help prevent various threats. We should also remember that times of peace are best suited for these preparations.

If we turn our attention, fellow-citizens, more immediately to the internal concerns of our country, and more especially to those on which its future welfare depends, we have every reason to anticipate the happiest results. It is now rather more than forty-four years since we declared our independence, and thirty-seven since it was acknowledged. The talents and virtues which were displayed in that great struggle were a sure presage of all that has since followed. A people who were able to surmount in their infant state such great perils would be more competent as they rose into manhood to repel any which they might meet in their progress. Their physical strength would be more adequate to foreign danger, and the practice of self-government, aided by the light of experience, could not fail to produce an effect equally salutary on all those questions connected with the internal organization. These favorable anticipations have been realized.

If we focus, fellow citizens, on the internal issues of our country, especially those that affect its future well-being, we have every reason to expect the best outcomes. It’s been just over forty-four years since we declared our independence and thirty-seven years since it was recognized. The skills and virtues demonstrated during that great struggle were a clear indication of everything that followed. A people who could overcome such significant challenges in their early days would be better equipped as they matured to face any obstacles ahead. Their physical strength would be more capable of handling foreign threats, and the experience gained from self-governing would surely have a positive impact on all matters related to our internal organization. These optimistic expectations have come true.

In our whole system, national and State, we have shunned all the defects which unceasingly preyed on the vitals and destroyed the ancient Republics. In them there were distinct orders, a nobility and a people, or the people governed in one assembly. Thus, in the one instance there was a perpetual conflict between the orders in society for the ascendency, in which the victory of either terminated in the overthrow of the government and the ruin of the state; in the other, in which the people governed in a body, and whose dominions seldom exceeded the dimensions of a county in one of our States, a tumultuous and disorderly movement permitted only a transitory existence. In this great nation there is but one order, that of the people, whose power, by a peculiarly happy improvement of the representative principle, is transferred from them, without impairing in the slightest degree their sovereignty, to bodies of their own creation, and to persons elected by themselves, in the full extent necessary for all the purposes of free, enlightened and efficient government. The whole system is elective, the complete sovereignty being in the people, and every officer in every department deriving his authority from and being responsible to them for his conduct.

In our entire system, both national and state, we've avoided all the flaws that constantly attacked the core and destroyed the ancient republics. In those, there were distinct classes, a nobility and the common people, or the people governed in one assembly. In one case, there was an ongoing struggle between the social classes for dominance, where the victory of either side led to the collapse of the government and the downfall of the state; in the other case, where the people governed as a whole, their territories rarely went beyond the size of a county in one of our states, leading to chaotic and disorderly situations that only allowed for a temporary existence. In this great nation, there is just one class: the people. Their power, through a particularly effective application of the representative principle, is delegated to bodies they create themselves and to individuals they elect, without compromising their sovereignty in any way, to serve all the needs of a free, informed, and efficient government. The entire system is based on elections, with the absolute sovereignty residing in the people, and every official in every department deriving their authority from them and being accountable for their actions.

Our career has corresponded with this great outline. Perfection in our organization could not have been expected in the outset either in the National or State Governments or in tracing the line between their respective powers. But no serious conflict has arisen, nor any contest but such as are managed by argument and by a fair appeal to the good sense of the people, and many of the defects which experience had clearly demonstrated in both Governments have been remedied. By steadily pursuing this course in this spirit there is every reason to believe that our system will soon attain the highest degree of perfection of which human institutions are capable, and that the movement in all its branches will exhibit such a degree of order and harmony as to command the admiration and respect of the civilized world.

Our career has aligned with this great plan. We couldn’t have expected perfection in our organization right from the start, whether in the National or State Governments, or in defining the boundaries of their respective powers. However, there haven't been any serious conflicts, nor any disputes other than those handled through discussion and a fair appeal to the good judgment of the people, and many of the issues that experience has clearly highlighted in both Governments have been addressed. By consistently following this approach with this mindset, there is every reason to believe that our system will soon reach the highest level of perfection that human institutions can achieve, and that the progress in all its areas will display such a level of order and harmony as to earn the admiration and respect of the civilized world.

Our physical attainments have not been less eminent. Twenty-five years ago the river Mississippi was shut up and our Western brethren had no outlet for their commerce. What has been the progress since that time? The river has not only become the property of the United States from its source to the ocean, with all its tributary streams (with the exception of the upper part of the Red River only), but Louisiana, with a fair and liberal boundary on the western side and the Floridas on the eastern, have been ceded to us. The United States now enjoy the complete and uninterrupted sovereignty over the whole territory from St. Croix to the Sabine. New States, settled from among ourselves in this and in other parts, have been admitted into our Union in equal participation in the national sovereignty with the original States. Our population has augmented in an astonishing degree and extended in every direction. We now, fellow-citizens, comprise within our limits the dimensions and faculties of a great power under a Government possessing all the energies of any government ever known to the Old World, with an utter incapacity to oppress the people.

Our physical achievements have been impressive. Twenty-five years ago, the Mississippi River was closed off, and our Western neighbors had no way to transport their goods. What progress have we made since then? The river is now fully owned by the United States from its source to the ocean, along with all its tributaries (except for a small part of the Red River). Louisiana, with a generous boundary on the west and Florida on the east, has been handed over to us. The United States now has complete and uninterrupted control over the entire territory from St. Croix to the Sabine. New states formed from our own citizens in this area and elsewhere have joined our Union, sharing equal rights with the original states. Our population has grown tremendously and spread in all directions. We now, fellow citizens, encompass the size and potential of a great power under a government that possesses all the capabilities of any government known to the Old World, with no ability to oppress the people.

Entering with these views the office which I have just solemnly sworn to execute with fidelity and to the utmost of my ability, I derive great satisfaction from a knowledge that I shall be assisted in the several Departments by the very enlightened and upright citizens from whom I have received so much aid in the preceding term. With full confidence in the continuance of that candor and generous indulgence from my fellow-citizens at large which I have heretofore experienced, and with a firm reliance on the protection of Almighty God, I shall forthwith commence the duties of the high trust to which you have called me.

Stepping into this office that I have just sworn to serve with honesty and to the best of my ability, I feel great satisfaction knowing that I will be supported by the knowledgeable and honorable citizens who helped me so much during my previous term. With full confidence in the ongoing kindness and generous understanding from my fellow citizens, which I have experienced before, and with a strong reliance on the protection of Almighty God, I will immediately begin the responsibilities of this important role you have entrusted to me.






JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, MARCH 4, 1825

[Transcriber's note: The only son of a former President to be elected to the Nation's highest office, John Quincy Adams was chosen by the House of Representatives when the electoral college could not determine a clear winner of the 1824 election. The outcome was assured when Henry Clay, one of the front-runners, threw his support to Mr. Adams so that Andrew Jackson's candidacy would fail. General Jackson had polled more popular votes in the election, but he did not gain enough electoral votes to win outright. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice John Marshall inside the Hall of the House of Representatives.]

[Transcriber's note: The only son of a former President to be elected to the nation's highest office, John Quincy Adams was selected by the House of Representatives when the electoral college could not decide a clear winner in the 1824 election. The outcome was secured when Henry Clay, one of the leading candidates, threw his support behind Mr. Adams to ensure that Andrew Jackson's candidacy would fail. General Jackson had received more popular votes in the election, but he didn't have enough electoral votes to win outright. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice John Marshall inside the Hall of the House of Representatives.]


In compliance with an usage coeval with the existence of our Federal Constitution, and sanctioned by the example of my predecessors in the career upon which I am about to enter, I appear, my fellow-citizens, in your presence and in that of Heaven to bind myself by the solemnities of religious obligation to the faithful performance of the duties allotted to me in the station to which I have been called.

In line with a tradition that dates back to the founding of our Federal Constitution, and following the example set by those who came before me, I stand before you, my fellow citizens, and in the presence of Heaven to commit myself through these solemn religious duties to faithfully fulfill the responsibilities of the position I have been given.

In unfolding to my countrymen the principles by which I shall be governed in the fulfillment of those duties my first resort will be to that Constitution which I shall swear to the best of my ability to preserve, protect, and defend. That revered instrument enumerates the powers and prescribes the duties of the Executive Magistrate, and in its first words declares the purposes to which these and the whole action of the Government instituted by it should be invariably and sacredly devoted—to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to the people of this Union in their successive generations. Since the adoption of this social compact one of these generations has passed away. It is the work of our forefathers. Administered by some of the most eminent men who contributed to its formation, through a most eventful period in the annals of the world, and through all the vicissitudes of peace and war incidental to the condition of associated man, it has not disappointed the hopes and aspirations of those illustrious benefactors of their age and nation. It has promoted the lasting welfare of that country so dear to us all; it has to an extent far beyond the ordinary lot of humanity secured the freedom and happiness of this people. We now receive it as a precious inheritance from those to whom we are indebted for its establishment, doubly bound by the examples which they have left us and by the blessings which we have enjoyed as the fruits of their labors to transmit the same unimpaired to the succeeding generation.

As I share with my fellow citizens the principles that will guide me in fulfilling my duties, I turn first to the Constitution. I pledge to uphold, protect, and defend it to the best of my ability. This respected document outlines the powers and responsibilities of the Executive and, from its very first words, states the goals to which all actions of the government established by it should be dedicated: to create a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic peace, provide for the common defense, promote the general well-being, and secure the blessings of liberty for the people of this Union across future generations. Since this social contract was adopted, one generation has passed. It is the legacy of our forefathers, administered by some of the most distinguished individuals who helped shape it during a pivotal time in history and through the ups and downs of peace and war that come with human society. It has fulfilled the hopes and dreams of those remarkable leaders of their time and nation. It has advanced the long-term welfare of our beloved country and has, to a degree far exceeding what is typical for humanity, ensured the freedom and happiness of our people. We now accept it as a valued inheritance from those we owe gratitude for its creation, and we are doubly compelled, by their examples and the blessings we enjoy from their efforts, to pass it on intact to the next generation.

In the compass of thirty-six years since this great national covenant was instituted a body of laws enacted under its authority and in conformity with its provisions has unfolded its powers and carried into practical operation its effective energies. Subordinate departments have distributed the executive functions in their various relations to foreign affairs, to the revenue and expenditures, and to the military force of the Union by land and sea. A coordinate department of the judiciary has expounded the Constitution and the laws, settling in harmonious coincidence with the legislative will numerous weighty questions of construction which the imperfection of human language had rendered unavoidable. The year of jubilee since the first formation of our Union has just elapsed; that of the declaration of our independence is at hand. The consummation of both was effected by this Constitution.

In the thirty-six years since this important national agreement was established, a set of laws created under its authority and in line with its provisions has revealed its power and put its effective operations into action. Various subordinate departments have carried out executive functions related to foreign affairs, revenue and spending, and the military forces of the Union, both on land and at sea. A separate judicial department has interpreted the Constitution and the laws, resolving many significant legal questions that arose from the limitations of human language, in agreement with the legislative intent. The year of celebration since the initial formation of our Union has just passed; the anniversary of our independence is approaching. The success of both was achieved through this Constitution.

Since that period a population of four millions has multiplied to twelve. A territory bounded by the Mississippi has been extended from sea to sea. New States have been admitted to the Union in numbers nearly equal to those of the first Confederation. Treaties of peace, amity, and commerce have been concluded with the principal dominions of the earth. The people of other nations, inhabitants of regions acquired not by conquest, but by compact, have been united with us in the participation of our rights and duties, of our burdens and blessings. The forest has fallen by the ax of our woodsmen; the soil has been made to teem by the tillage of our farmers; our commerce has whitened every ocean. The dominion of man over physical nature has been extended by the invention of our artists. Liberty and law have marched hand in hand. All the purposes of human association have been accomplished as effectively as under any other government on the globe, and at a cost little exceeding in a whole generation the expenditure of other nations in a single year.

Since that time, our population has grown from four million to twelve million. A territory bounded by the Mississippi has stretched from coast to coast. New States have joined the Union in numbers nearly equal to those of the original Confederation. Treaties of peace, friendship, and trade have been made with the major powers of the world. People from other nations, living in areas we acquired not through warfare, but through agreements, have joined us in sharing our rights and responsibilities, as well as our struggles and advantages. The forest has fallen to the axes of our lumberjacks; the land has thrived thanks to the hard work of our farmers; our trade has reached every ocean. Humanity’s control over nature has grown through the inventions of our creators. Freedom and law have advanced together. All the goals of human cooperation have been achieved as effectively as in any other government on the planet, and at a cost that is barely more than what other nations spend in a single year.

Such is the unexaggerated picture of our condition under a Constitution founded upon the republican principle of equal rights. To admit that this picture has its shades is but to say that it is still the condition of men upon earth. From evil—physical, moral, and political—it is not our claim to be exempt. We have suffered sometimes by the visitation of Heaven through disease; often by the wrongs and injustice of other nations, even to the extremities of war; and, lastly, by dissensions among ourselves—dissensions perhaps inseparable from the enjoyment of freedom, but which have more than once appeared to threaten the dissolution of the Union, and with it the overthrow of all the enjoyments of our present lot and all our earthly hopes of the future. The causes of these dissensions have been various, founded upon differences of speculation in the theory of republican government; upon conflicting views of policy in our relations with foreign nations; upon jealousies of partial and sectional interests, aggravated by prejudices and prepossessions which strangers to each other are ever apt to entertain.

This is the realistic view of our situation under a Constitution based on the republican principle of equal rights. To acknowledge that this view has its nuances is simply to recognize the reality of human existence. We don't claim to be free from all forms of evil—physical, moral, and political. We have faced challenges from natural disasters and diseases; often suffered due to the wrongdoings and injustices of other nations, even leading to war; and lastly, dealt with conflicts among ourselves—disputes that may be unavoidable when enjoying freedom, but which have repeatedly threatened the unity of the nation and, along with it, all the benefits of our current circumstances and our hopes for the future. The reasons for these conflicts have been diverse, arising from different interpretations of republican government theory; contrasting perspectives on policies regarding foreign nations; and rivalries based on local and sectional interests, heightened by biases and preconceived notions that people often have towards those they don't know.

It is a source of gratification and of encouragement to me to observe that the great result of this experiment upon the theory of human rights has at the close of that generation by which it was formed been crowned with success equal to the most sanguine expectations of its founders. Union, justice, tranquillity, the common defense, the general welfare, and the blessings of liberty—all have been promoted by the Government under which we have lived. Standing at this point of time, looking back to that generation which has gone by and forward to that which is advancing, we may at once indulge in grateful exultation and in cheering hope. From the experience of the past we derive instructive lessons for the future. Of the two great political parties which have divided the opinions and feelings of our country, the candid and the just will now admit that both have contributed splendid talents, spotless integrity, ardent patriotism, and disinterested sacrifices to the formation and administration of this Government, and that both have required a liberal indulgence for a portion of human infirmity and error. The revolutionary wars of Europe, commencing precisely at the moment when the Government of the United States first went into operation under this Constitution, excited a collision of sentiments and of sympathies which kindled all the passions and imbittered the conflict of parties till the nation was involved in war and the Union was shaken to its center. This time of trial embraced a period of five and twenty years, during which the policy of the Union in its relations with Europe constituted the principal basis of our political divisions and the most arduous part of the action of our Federal Government. With the catastrophe in which the wars of the French Revolution terminated, and our own subsequent peace with Great Britain, this baneful weed of party strife was uprooted. From that time no difference of principle, connected either with the theory of government or with our intercourse with foreign nations, has existed or been called forth in force sufficient to sustain a continued combination of parties or to give more than wholesome animation to public sentiment or legislative debate. Our political creed is, without a dissenting voice that can be heard, that the will of the people is the source and the happiness of the people the end of all legitimate government upon earth; that the best security for the beneficence and the best guaranty against the abuse of power consists in the freedom, the purity, and the frequency of popular elections; that the General Government of the Union and the separate governments of the States are all sovereignties of limited powers, fellow-servants of the same masters, uncontrolled within their respective spheres, uncontrollable by encroachments upon each other; that the firmest security of peace is the preparation during peace of the defenses of war; that a rigorous economy and accountability of public expenditures should guard against the aggravation and alleviate when possible the burden of taxation; that the military should be kept in strict subordination to the civil power; that the freedom of the press and of religious opinion should be inviolate; that the policy of our country is peace and the ark of our salvation union are articles of faith upon which we are all now agreed. If there have been those who doubted whether a confederated representative democracy were a government competent to the wise and orderly management of the common concerns of a mighty nation, those doubts have been dispelled; if there have been projects of partial confederacies to be erected upon the ruins of the Union, they have been scattered to the winds; if there have been dangerous attachments to one foreign nation and antipathies against another, they have been extinguished. Ten years of peace, at home and abroad, have assuaged the animosities of political contention and blended into harmony the most discordant elements of public opinion. There still remains one effort of magnanimity, one sacrifice of prejudice and passion, to be made by the individuals throughout the nation who have heretofore followed the standards of political party. It is that of discarding every remnant of rancor against each other, of embracing as countrymen and friends, and of yielding to talents and virtue alone that confidence which in times of contention for principle was bestowed only upon those who bore the badge of party communion.

It’s really gratifying and encouraging to see that the significant outcome of this experiment in human rights has, by the end of the generation that created it, achieved success beyond what its founders could have hoped for. Union, justice, peace, common defense, general welfare, and the blessings of liberty—these have all been advanced by the government we've lived under. Standing here, looking back at the generation that has passed and forward to the one that’s coming, we can feel both thankful excitement and hopeful cheer. From our past experiences, we learn valuable lessons for the future. Of the two major political parties that have divided opinions and feelings in our country, those who are fair and just will now acknowledge that both have contributed exceptional talent, integrity, passionate patriotism, and selfless sacrifices to the formation and administration of this government, and that both require a generous understanding of human flaws and mistakes. The revolutionary wars in Europe, which began just as the U.S. government first started operating under this Constitution, sparked a clash of feelings and sympathies that ignited passions and deepened party conflicts until the nation was embroiled in war and the Union was shaken to its core. This challenging period lasted twenty-five years, during which the Union’s foreign relations policy was the main basis for our political divisions and constituted the most demanding part of our federal government’s actions. With the disasters that ended the French Revolution and our subsequent peace with Great Britain, the damaging weeds of party strife were removed. Since then, there has been no significant ideological division related to government theory or foreign relations strong enough to sustain a lasting coalition of parties or to produce more than a healthy energy for public sentiment or legislative debate. Our political belief is unchallenged: that the people's will is the source of power and their happiness is the purpose of all legitimate governments on earth; that the best protection against abuse of power lies in the freedom, fairness, and frequency of popular elections; that the General Government and the separate state governments are all sovereigns with limited powers, working together for the same people, each independent in their own areas and unhindered by encroachments on each other; that the greatest assurance of peace comes from preparing for war during peaceful times; that a strict economy and accountability in public spending should help lighten the burden of taxes; that the military must remain strictly under the control of civil authority; that freedom of the press and religious opinions must be protected; that our country’s policy is peace and the foundation of our salvation is unity—these are beliefs we all share now. If some people doubted whether a confederated representative democracy could effectively manage the important concerns of a large nation, those doubts have been cleared away; if there were plans for partial confederacies to be built on the ruins of the Union, they have been blown away; if there have been dangerous allegiances to one foreign nation while opposing another, those feelings have been extinguished. Ten years of peace, both home and abroad, have eased political hostilities and brought together the most discordant public opinions. Yet, there is still one act of generosity, one sacrifice of bias and passion, that individuals across the nation who have previously been loyal to political parties must make. It is to let go of all resentment towards each other, to embrace one another as fellow citizens and friends, and to trust only talents and virtue without party affiliation that was only granted during disputes over principles.

The collisions of party spirit which originate in speculative opinions or in different views of administrative policy are in their nature transitory. Those which are founded on geographical divisions, adverse interests of soil, climate, and modes of domestic life are more permanent, and therefore, perhaps, more dangerous. It is this which gives inestimable value to the character of our Government, at once federal and national. It holds out to us a perpetual admonition to preserve alike and with equal anxiety the rights of each individual State in its own government and the rights of the whole nation in that of the Union. Whatsoever is of domestic concernment, unconnected with the other members of the Union or with foreign lands, belongs exclusively to the administration of the State governments. Whatsoever directly involves the rights and interests of the federative fraternity or of foreign powers is of the resort of this General Government. The duties of both are obvious in the general principle, though sometimes perplexed with difficulties in the detail. To respect the rights of the State governments is the inviolable duty of that of the Union; the government of every State will feel its own obligation to respect and preserve the rights of the whole. The prejudices everywhere too commonly entertained against distant strangers are worn away, and the jealousies of jarring interests are allayed by the composition and functions of the great national councils annually assembled from all quarters of the Union at this place. Here the distinguished men from every section of our country, while meeting to deliberate upon the great interests of those by whom they are deputed, learn to estimate the talents and do justice to the virtues of each other. The harmony of the nation is promoted and the whole Union is knit together by the sentiments of mutual respect, the habits of social intercourse, and the ties of personal friendship formed between the representatives of its several parts in the performance of their service at this metropolis.

The clashes of political opinions that stem from differing views or administrative policies are generally temporary. In contrast, conflicts based on geographic divisions, differing interests related to land, weather, and lifestyle are more lasting and, perhaps, more perilous. This is what gives immense value to the character of our Government, which is both federal and national. It serves as a constant reminder to protect both the rights of each individual State in its own governance and the rights of the entire nation within the Union. Anything concerning domestic matters that isn’t related to the other members of the Union or foreign countries is solely the responsibility of the State governments. Anything that directly impacts the rights and interests of the federal union or foreign nations falls under the jurisdiction of the General Government. The responsibilities of both are clear in principle, though sometimes complicated in practice. Respecting the rights of State governments is an unbreakable duty of the Union; likewise, the government of each State is compelled to respect and uphold the rights of the whole. The biases often held against distant outsiders diminish, and the tensions from conflicting interests ease thanks to the collaboration and roles of the major national councils that gather annually from all parts of the Union here. In this place, distinguished individuals from every region of our country meet to discuss the significant interests of their constituents and learn to appreciate each other's talents and virtues. The harmony of the nation is enhanced, and the entire Union is united through mutual respect, social connections, and personal friendships formed among the representatives of its various parts during their work in the capital.

Passing from this general review of the purposes and injunctions of the Federal Constitution and their results as indicating the first traces of the path of duty in the discharge of my public trust, I turn to the Administration of my immediate predecessor as the second. It has passed away in a period of profound peace, how much to the satisfaction of our country and to the honor of our country's name is known to you all. The great features of its policy, in general concurrence with the will of the Legislature, have been to cherish peace while preparing for defensive war; to yield exact justice to other nations and maintain the rights of our own; to cherish the principles of freedom and of equal rights wherever they were proclaimed; to discharge with all possible promptitude the national debt; to reduce within the narrowest limits of efficiency the military force; to improve the organization and discipline of the Army; to provide and sustain a school of military science; to extend equal protection to all the great interests of the nation; to promote the civilization of the Indian tribes, and to proceed in the great system of internal improvements within the limits of the constitutional power of the Union. Under the pledge of these promises, made by that eminent citizen at the time of his first induction to this office, in his career of eight years the internal taxes have been repealed; sixty millions of the public debt have been discharged; provision has been made for the comfort and relief of the aged and indigent among the surviving warriors of the Revolution; the regular armed force has been reduced and its constitution revised and perfected; the accountability for the expenditure of public moneys has been made more effective; the Floridas have been peaceably acquired, and our boundary has been extended to the Pacific Ocean; the independence of the southern nations of this hemisphere has been recognized, and recommended by example and by counsel to the potentates of Europe; progress has been made in the defense of the country by fortifications and the increase of the Navy, toward the effectual suppression of the African traffic in slaves; in alluring the aboriginal hunters of our land to the cultivation of the soil and of the mind, in exploring the interior regions of the Union, and in preparing by scientific researches and surveys for the further application of our national resources to the internal improvement of our country.

Moving on from this general overview of the goals and mandates of the Federal Constitution and their outcomes, which highlight the initial steps of my duty in fulfilling my public responsibilities, I now reflect on the administration of my immediate predecessor as the next point of discussion. It occurred during a time of deep peace, and how much that pleased our country and honored its name is known to all of you. The main elements of its policy, largely in alignment with the Legislature's wishes, focused on maintaining peace while preparing for defensive military action; ensuring fair treatment of other nations while upholding our own rights; supporting the principles of freedom and equal rights wherever they were declared; swiftly addressing the national debt; minimizing military force to the greatest extent necessary; enhancing the organization and discipline of the Army; establishing and sustaining a military science school; providing equal protection for all significant national interests; promoting the development of Native American tribes; and advancing the major projects of internal improvements within the constitutional authority of the Union. Under the commitments made by that distinguished citizen during his initial induction into this office, over eight years, internal taxes were abolished; sixty million of the public debt was paid off; assistance was arranged for the comfort and support of aging and needy veterans from the Revolution; the regular armed forces were reduced, and its structure was improved and refined; accountability for public spending was strengthened; Florida was peacefully acquired, expanding our territory to the Pacific Ocean; the independence of southern nations in this hemisphere was recognized and encouraged as a model and guidance for European powers; progress was made in national defense through fortifications and enhancements to the Navy; efforts were aimed at effectively halting the trafficking of African slaves; Indigenous hunters were encouraged to adopt agriculture and education; explorations of the nation’s interior were undertaken; and scientific studies and surveys were conducted in preparation for further utilizing our national resources to improve our country internally.

In this brief outline of the promise and performance of my immediate predecessor the line of duty for his successor is clearly delineated. To pursue to their consummation those purposes of improvement in our common condition instituted or recommended by him will embrace the whole sphere of my obligations. To the topic of internal improvement, emphatically urged by him at his inauguration, I recur with peculiar satisfaction. It is that from which I am convinced that the unborn millions of our posterity who are in future ages to people this continent will derive their most fervent gratitude to the founders of the Union; that in which the beneficent action of its Government will be most deeply felt and acknowledged. The magnificence and splendor of their public works are among the imperishable glories of the ancient republics. The roads and aqueducts of Rome have been the admiration of all after ages, and have survived thousands of years after all her conquests have been swallowed up in despotism or become the spoil of barbarians. Some diversity of opinion has prevailed with regard to the powers of Congress for legislation upon objects of this nature. The most respectful deference is due to doubts originating in pure patriotism and sustained by venerated authority. But nearly twenty years have passed since the construction of the first national road was commenced. The authority for its construction was then unquestioned. To how many thousands of our countrymen has it proved a benefit? To what single individual has it ever proved an injury? Repeated, liberal, and candid discussions in the Legislature have conciliated the sentiments and approximated the opinions of enlightened minds upon the question of constitutional power. I can not but hope that by the same process of friendly, patient, and persevering deliberation all constitutional objections will ultimately be removed. The extent and limitation of the powers of the General Government in relation to this transcendently important interest will be settled and acknowledged to the common satisfaction of all, and every speculative scruple will be solved by a practical public blessing.

In this brief overview of the goals and achievements of my immediate predecessor, the responsibilities for his successor are clearly outlined. Continuing the efforts to improve our shared circumstances that he initiated or advocated will encompass all of my duties. I refer back to the topic of internal improvement, which he strongly emphasized at his inauguration, with particular satisfaction. I believe that future generations, who will populate this continent, will feel the deepest gratitude toward the founders of the Union; it is in this area where the positive influence of the government will be most profoundly recognized. The impressive public works are among the lasting legacies of ancient republics. The roads and aqueducts of Rome have been admired throughout history and have survived for thousands of years, even after its conquests were lost to tyranny or looted by invaders. There has been some disagreement regarding Congress's authority to legislate on these matters. Respectful consideration is warranted for doubts that arise from pure patriotism and are supported by respected authority. However, nearly twenty years have passed since the construction of the first national road began, and the authority for its construction was then unquestionable. How many thousands of our fellow citizens have benefited from it? To any individual has it ever caused harm? Repeated, open, and fair discussions in the Legislature have brought together diverse opinions and harmonized enlightened views on the question of constitutional power. I remain hopeful that through the same approach of friendly, patient, and consistent dialogue, all constitutional objections will eventually be resolved. The scope and limits of the General Government's powers regarding this crucial issue will be established and accepted to everyone's satisfaction, and every theoretical concern will be addressed by a tangible public benefit.

Fellow-citizens, you are acquainted with the peculiar circumstances of the recent election, which have resulted in affording me the opportunity of addressing you at this time. You have heard the exposition of the principles which will direct me in the fulfillment of the high and solemn trust imposed upon me in this station. Less possessed of your confidence in advance than any of my predecessors, I am deeply conscious of the prospect that I shall stand more and oftener in need of your indulgence. Intentions upright and pure, a heart devoted to the welfare of our country, and the unceasing application of all the faculties allotted to me to her service are all the pledges that I can give for the faithful performance of the arduous duties I am to undertake. To the guidance of the legislative councils, to the assistance of the executive and subordinate departments, to the friendly cooperation of the respective State governments, to the candid and liberal support of the people so far as it may be deserved by honest industry and zeal, I shall look for whatever success may attend my public service; and knowing that "except the Lord keep the city the watchman waketh but in vain," with fervent supplications for His favor, to His overruling providence I commit with humble but fearless confidence my own fate and the future destinies of my country.

Fellow citizens, you’re aware of the unique circumstances surrounding the recent election, which have given me the chance to speak to you now. You’ve heard the principles that will guide me as I take on this important responsibility. With less of your confidence than any of my predecessors, I fully recognize that I will often need your patience. My intentions are honest and pure, my heart is dedicated to the well-being of our country, and I will apply all my abilities to serve her—these are my only promises for fulfilling the challenging duties ahead of me. I will rely on the guidance of the legislative councils, the support of the executive and other departments, the cooperation of the state governments, and the honest backing of the people, as long as it is earned through hard work and dedication, for whatever success I may achieve in my public service. And knowing that "unless the Lord protects the city, the watchman guards it in vain," I sincerely pray for His favor and, with humble but confident trust, I commit my fate and the future of my country to His divine will.






ANDREW JACKSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1829

[Transcriber's note: The election of Andrew Jackson was heralded as a new page in the history of the Republic. The first military leader elected President since George Washington, he was much admired by the electorate, who came to Washington to celebrate "Old Hickory's" inauguration. Outgoing President Adams did not join in the ceremony, which was held for the first time on the East Portico of the Capitol building. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office. After the proceedings at the Capitol, a large group of citizens walked with the new President along Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House, and many of them visited the executive mansion that day and evening. Such large numbers of people arrived that many of the furnishings were ruined. President Jackson left the building by a window to avoid the crush of people.]

[Transcriber's note: The election of Andrew Jackson was seen as a new chapter in the history of the Republic. He was the first military leader elected President since George Washington and was highly respected by the voters, who came to Washington to celebrate "Old Hickory's" inauguration. Outgoing President Adams did not participate in the ceremony, which was held for the first time on the East Portico of the Capitol building. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office. After the events at the Capitol, a large crowd of citizens walked with the new President down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House, and many of them visited the executive mansion that day and evening. So many people arrived that much of the furniture was damaged. President Jackson left the building through a window to avoid the crowd.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

About to undertake the arduous duties that I have been appointed to perform by the choice of a free people, I avail myself of this customary and solemn occasion to express the gratitude which their confidence inspires and to acknowledge the accountability which my situation enjoins. While the magnitude of their interests convinces me that no thanks can be adequate to the honor they have conferred, it admonishes me that the best return I can make is the zealous dedication of my humble abilities to their service and their good.

About to take on the challenging responsibilities that I've been chosen to fulfill by the will of a free people, I want to take this customary and serious moment to express my gratitude for the trust they've placed in me and to recognize the responsibilities that come with my role. While the significance of their interests shows me that no thanks will ever be enough for the honor they've given me, it reminds me that the best way I can repay this trust is by dedicating my humble abilities wholeheartedly to their service and well-being.

As the instrument of the Federal Constitution it will devolve on me for a stated period to execute the laws of the United States, to superintend their foreign and their confederate relations, to manage their revenue, to command their forces, and, by communications to the Legislature, to watch over and to promote their interests generally. And the principles of action by which I shall endeavor to accomplish this circle of duties it is now proper for me briefly to explain.

As the authority of the Federal Constitution, it is now my responsibility for a specific period to enforce the laws of the United States, oversee their foreign and interstate relations, manage their finances, command the military, and keep the Legislature informed while promoting the nation's interests overall. I will now briefly explain the guiding principles I plan to follow to fulfill these duties.

In administering the laws of Congress I shall keep steadily in view the limitations as well as the extent of the Executive power trusting thereby to discharge the functions of my office without transcending its authority. With foreign nations it will be my study to preserve peace and to cultivate friendship on fair and honorable terms, and in the adjustment of any differences that may exist or arise to exhibit the forbearance becoming a powerful nation rather than the sensibility belonging to a gallant people.

In carrying out the laws of Congress, I will consistently keep in mind both the limitations and the scope of Executive power, ensuring that I fulfill my duties without overstepping my authority. With other countries, my focus will be on maintaining peace and building friendships on fair and honorable terms. When dealing with any existing or potential disagreements, I will show the patience expected of a powerful nation rather than the emotional responses associated with a brave people.

In such measures as I may be called on to pursue in regard to the rights of the separate States I hope to be animated by a proper respect for those sovereign members of our Union, taking care not to confound the powers they have reserved to themselves with those they have granted to the Confederacy.

In any actions I may need to take regarding the rights of the individual States, I hope to be driven by a proper respect for those sovereign parts of our Union, making sure not to mix up the powers they have kept for themselves with those they have given to the Confederacy.

The management of the public revenue—that searching operation in all governments—is among the most delicate and important trusts in ours, and it will, of course, demand no inconsiderable share of my official solicitude. Under every aspect in which it can be considered it would appear that advantage must result from the observance of a strict and faithful economy. This I shall aim at the more anxiously both because it will facilitate the extinguishment of the national debt, the unnecessary duration of which is incompatible with real independence, and because it will counteract that tendency to public and private profligacy which a profuse expenditure of money by the Government is but too apt to engender. Powerful auxiliaries to the attainment of this desirable end are to be found in the regulations provided by the wisdom of Congress for the specific appropriation of public money and the prompt accountability of public officers.

Managing public revenue—a task that every government faces—is one of the most sensitive and crucial responsibilities in ours, and it will certainly require considerable attention from me. No matter how it's looked at, it seems clear that following a strict and honest approach to budgeting will lead to benefits. I will focus on this even more because it will help reduce the national debt, which poses a barrier to true independence, and because it will help counteract the tendency toward wastefulness in both public and private sectors that comes from government overspending. Key support in achieving this important goal comes from the rules established by Congress regarding the specific allocation of public funds and the timely accountability of public officials.

With regard to a proper selection of the subjects of impost with a view to revenue, it would seem to me that the spirit of equity, caution and compromise in which the Constitution was formed requires that the great interests of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures should be equally favored, and that perhaps the only exception to this rule should consist in the peculiar encouragement of any products of either of them that may be found essential to our national independence.

When it comes to choosing the subjects for taxation with the goal of generating revenue, I believe that the fairness, caution, and compromise that shaped the Constitution demand that the major sectors of agriculture, commerce, and manufacturing should all be supported equally. The only exception to this rule might be to specifically promote any products from these sectors that are deemed essential for our national independence.

Internal improvement and the diffusion of knowledge, so far as they can be promoted by the constitutional acts of the Federal Government, are of high importance.

Internal improvement and the spread of knowledge, as much as they can be supported by the constitutional actions of the Federal Government, are very important.

Considering standing armies as dangerous to free governments in time of peace, I shall not seek to enlarge our present establishment, nor disregard that salutary lesson of political experience which teaches that the military should be held subordinate to the civil power. The gradual increase of our Navy, whose flag has displayed in distant climes our skill in navigation and our fame in arms; the preservation of our forts, arsenals, and dockyards, and the introduction of progressive improvements in the discipline and science of both branches of our military service are so plainly prescribed by prudence that I should be excused for omitting their mention sooner than for enlarging on their importance. But the bulwark of our defense is the national militia, which in the present state of our intelligence and population must render us invincible. As long as our Government is administered for the good of the people, and is regulated by their will; as long as it secures to us the rights of person and of property, liberty of conscience and of the press, it will be worth defending; and so long as it is worth defending a patriotic militia will cover it with an impenetrable aegis. Partial injuries and occasional mortifications we may be subjected to, but a million of armed freemen, possessed of the means of war, can never be conquered by a foreign foe. To any just system, therefore, calculated to strengthen this natural safeguard of the country I shall cheerfully lend all the aid in my power.

Considering standing armies to be a threat to free governments during peacetime, I won’t push to expand our current military presence, nor will I overlook the important lesson from political experience that the military should remain under civilian control. The steady growth of our Navy, which has showcased our navigation skills and military reputation in far-off lands; the maintenance of our forts, arsenals, and shipyards; and the introduction of modern improvements in the training and strategy of both branches of our military are so clearly guided by common sense that I would be excused for mentioning them only briefly rather than elaborating on their significance. But the true strength of our defense lies in the national militia, which, given our current level of intelligence and population, must make us unbeatable. As long as our government is run for the benefit of the people and aligns with their will; as long as it protects our rights to personal freedom and property, as well as freedom of conscience and the press, it will be worth defending; and as long as it's worth defending, a dedicated militia will shield it with an unbreakable cover. We may face some injuries and occasional setbacks, but a million armed citizens with the means for warfare can never be defeated by a foreign enemy. Therefore, I will gladly support any fair initiative designed to strengthen this natural defense of our country.

It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.

It will be my genuine and ongoing intention to treat the Indian tribes within our borders with fairness and generosity, and to provide the compassionate and thoughtful attention to their rights and needs that aligns with our Government's practices and our people's sentiments.

The recent demonstration of public sentiment inscribes on the list of Executive duties, in characters too legible to be overlooked, the task of reform, which will require particularly the correction of those abuses that have brought the patronage of the Federal Government into conflict with the freedom of elections, and the counteraction of those causes which have disturbed the rightful course of appointment and have placed or continued power in unfaithful or incompetent hands.

The recent display of public opinion highlights a crucial responsibility for the Executive, clearly emphasizing the need for reform. This involves specifically addressing the abuses that have caused the Federal Government's support to clash with the integrity of elections, as well as tackling the issues that have disrupted proper appointments and allowed power to remain with untrustworthy or incompetent individuals.

In the performance of a task thus generally delineated I shall endeavor to select men whose diligence and talents will insure in their respective stations able and faithful cooperation, depending for the advancement of the public service more on the integrity and zeal of the public officers than on their numbers.

In carrying out this task, I will try to choose individuals whose hard work and skills will guarantee strong and reliable teamwork in their roles, believing that the success of public service relies more on the honesty and enthusiasm of public officials than on the sheer number of them.

A diffidence, perhaps too just, in my own qualifications will teach me to look with reverence to the examples of public virtue left by my illustrious predecessors, and with veneration to the lights that flow from the mind that founded and the mind that reformed our system. The same diffidence induces me to hope for instruction and aid from the coordinate branches of the Government, and for the indulgence and support of my fellow-citizens generally. And a firm reliance on the goodness of that Power whose providence mercifully protected our national infancy, and has since upheld our liberties in various vicissitudes, encourages me to offer up my ardent supplications that He will continue to make our beloved country the object of His divine care and gracious benediction.

A certain humility about my own qualifications teaches me to look up to the examples of public virtue set by my distinguished predecessors, and to respect the insights from the minds that established and improved our system. This same humility encourages me to seek guidance and support from the different branches of government, as well as the understanding and backing of my fellow citizens in general. Additionally, my strong belief in the goodness of the higher power that graciously protected our nation in its early days and has continued to uphold our freedoms through various challenges inspires me to earnestly pray that He will keep our beloved country under His divine care and blessing.






ANDREW JACKSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1833

[Transcriber's note: Cold weather and the President's poor health caused the second inauguration to be much quieter than the first. The President's speech was delivered to a large assembly inside the Hall of the House of Representatives. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office for the ninth, and last, time.]

[Transcriber's note: Cold weather and the President's poor health made the second inauguration much quieter than the first. The President's speech was given to a large crowd inside the Hall of the House of Representatives. Chief Justice John Marshall administered the oath of office for the ninth and final time.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow citizens:

The will of the American people, expressed through their unsolicited suffrages, calls me before you to pass through the solemnities preparatory to taking upon myself the duties of President of the United States for another term. For their approbation of my public conduct through a period which has not been without its difficulties, and for this renewed expression of their confidence in my good intentions, I am at a loss for terms adequate to the expression of my gratitude. It shall be displayed to the extent of my humble abilities in continued efforts so to administer the Government as to preserve their liberty and promote their happiness.

The will of the American people, shown through their votes, brings me here to go through the formalities of taking on the role of President of the United States for another term. I am deeply grateful for their approval of my actions during a time that hasn’t been without its challenges, and for this renewed expression of their trust in my good intentions, I struggle to find the words to express my thanks. I will demonstrate my gratitude to the best of my ability by continuing to run the Government in a way that protects their freedom and encourages their well-being.

So many events have occurred within the last four years which have necessarily called forth—sometimes under circumstances the most delicate and painful—my views of the principles and policy which ought to be pursued by the General Government that I need on this occasion but allude to a few leading considerations connected with some of them.

So many things have happened in the last four years that have required me to share—sometimes in very delicate and painful situations—my thoughts on the principles and policies that the federal government should follow. I just need to mention a few key points related to some of these issues.

The foreign policy adopted by our Government soon after the formation of our present Constitution, and very generally pursued by successive Administrations, has been crowned with almost complete success, and has elevated our character among the nations of the earth. To do justice to all and to submit to wrong from none has been during my Administration its governing maxim, and so happy have been its results that we are not only at peace with all the world, but have few causes of controversy, and those of minor importance, remaining unadjusted.

The foreign policy adopted by our government shortly after the creation of our current Constitution, and generally followed by successive administrations, has achieved nearly complete success and has enhanced our reputation among the nations. Treating everyone fairly and not accepting wrongdoing from anyone has been the guiding principle during my administration, and the results have been so positive that we are not only at peace with the entire world but also have few unresolved issues, and those are of minor importance.

In the domestic policy of this Government there are two objects which especially deserve the attention of the people and their representatives, and which have been and will continue to be the subjects of my increasing solicitude. They are the preservation of the rights of the several States and the integrity of the Union.

In this government's domestic policy, there are two key issues that particularly deserve the attention of the public and their representatives, and that have been and will continue to be my growing concern. They are the protection of the rights of individual states and the unity of the Union.

These great objects are necessarily connected, and can only be attained by an enlightened exercise of the powers of each within its appropriate sphere in conformity with the public will constitutionally expressed. To this end it becomes the duty of all to yield a ready and patriotic submission to the laws constitutionally enacted and thereby promote and strengthen a proper confidence in those institutions of the several States and of the United States which the people themselves have ordained for their own government.

These important goals are inherently linked and can only be achieved through a thoughtful use of each power within its relevant area, in accordance with the public will expressed through the Constitution. To achieve this, everyone has a responsibility to willingly and patriotically follow the laws that have been constitutionally enacted, thus promoting and reinforcing trust in the institutions of the individual States and the United States that the people have established for their own governance.

My experience in public concerns and the observation of a life somewhat advanced confirm the opinions long since imbibed by me, that the destruction of our State governments or the annihilation of their control over the local concerns of the people would lead directly to revolution and anarchy, and finally to despotism and military domination. In proportion, therefore, as the General Government encroaches upon the rights of the States, in the same proportion does it impair its own power and detract from its ability to fulfill the purposes of its creation. Solemnly impressed with these considerations, my countrymen will ever find me ready to exercise my constitutional powers in arresting measures which may directly or indirectly encroach upon the rights of the States or tend to consolidate all political power in the General Government. But of equal, and, indeed, of incalculable, importance is the union of these States, and the sacred duty of all to contribute to its preservation by a liberal support of the General Government in the exercise of its just powers. You have been wisely admonished to "accustom yourselves to think and speak of the Union as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity, watching for its preservation with Jealous anxiety, discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned, and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of any attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts." Without union our independence and liberty would never have been achieved; without union they never can be maintained. Divided into twenty-four, or even a smaller number, of separate communities, we shall see our internal trade burdened with numberless restraints and exactions; communication between distant points and sections obstructed or cut off; our sons made soldiers to deluge with blood the fields they now till in peace; the mass of our people borne down and impoverished by taxes to support armies and navies, and military leaders at the head of their victorious legions becoming our lawgivers and judges. The loss of liberty, of all good government, of peace, plenty, and happiness, must inevitably follow a dissolution of the Union. In supporting it, therefore, we support all that is dear to the freeman and the philanthropist.

My experience with public issues and my observation of a somewhat advanced life confirm what I have long believed: that destroying our state governments or removing their control over local matters would lead directly to revolution, chaos, and ultimately tyranny and military rule. As the federal government infringes upon the rights of the states, it simultaneously weakens its own power and diminishes its ability to achieve its intended purposes. Deeply aware of this, my fellow citizens will always find me prepared to use my constitutional powers to stop any actions that may directly or indirectly encroach upon state rights or consolidate all political power in the federal government. Equally important, and indeed of immeasurable value, is the unity of these states, and it is our sacred duty to support its preservation by generously backing the federal government in exercising its rightful powers. You have been wisely reminded to "get used to thinking and speaking of the Union as the foundation of your political safety and prosperity, diligently watching for its preservation with great care, dismissing anything that even hints it could be abandoned, and indignantly opposing any initial attempts to separate any part of our country from the rest or weaken the vital bonds that currently connect us." Without unity, our independence and liberty would never have been achieved; without unity, they can never be maintained. Divided into twenty-four or even fewer separate communities, we would see our internal trade burdened with countless restrictions and taxes; communication between distant areas obstructed or severed; our sons turned into soldiers, spilling blood on the lands they now farm in peace; the majority of our people crushed and impoverished by taxes to support armies and navies, while military leaders at the head of their victorious forces become our lawmakers and judges. The loss of liberty, good governance, peace, abundance, and happiness will inevitably follow a breakdown of the Union. Therefore, by supporting it, we support everything that is precious to every free person and humanitarian.

The time at which I stand before you is full of interest. The eyes of all nations are fixed on our Republic. The event of the existing crisis will be decisive in the opinion of mankind of the practicability of our federal system of government. Great is the stake placed in our hands; great is the responsibility which must rest upon the people of the United States. Let us realize the importance of the attitude in which we stand before the world. Let us exercise forbearance and firmness. Let us extricate our country from the dangers which surround it and learn wisdom from the lessons they inculcate.

The moment I’m addressing you is incredibly significant. The eyes of the entire world are on our Republic. How we handle the current crisis will greatly influence people's views on the viability of our federal system of government. The stakes are high, and we have a huge responsibility as the people of the United States. Let's acknowledge how important our position is in front of the world. Let’s be patient and resolute. Let’s pull our country away from the dangers it faces and gain wisdom from the lessons we learn.

Deeply impressed with the truth of these observations, and under the obligation of that solemn oath which I am about to take, I shall continue to exert all my faculties to maintain the just powers of the Constitution and to transmit unimpaired to posterity the blessings of our Federal Union. At the same time, it will be my aim to inculcate by my official acts the necessity of exercising by the General Government those powers only that are clearly delegated; to encourage simplicity and economy in the expenditures of the Government; to raise no more money from the people than may be requisite for these objects, and in a manner that will best promote the interests of all classes of the community and of all portions of the Union. Constantly bearing in mind that in entering into society "individuals must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest," it will be my desire so to discharge my duties as to foster with our brethren in all parts of the country a spirit of liberal concession and compromise, and, by reconciling our fellow-citizens to those partial sacrifices which they must unavoidably make for the preservation of a greater good, to recommend our invaluable Government and Union to the confidence and affections of the American people.

Feeling deeply compelled by the truth of these observations and under the weight of the solemn oath I am about to take, I will do everything in my power to uphold the rightful authority of the Constitution and to ensure that the blessings of our Federal Union are passed down intact to future generations. At the same time, I aim to demonstrate through my official actions the importance of the General Government only exercising the powers that are clearly granted; to promote simplicity and thrift in government spending; to collect no more funds from the public than necessary for these purposes, and to do so in a way that benefits all groups within the community and all parts of the Union. I will always remember that when individuals join society, "they must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest." Therefore, I intend to perform my duties in a way that encourages a spirit of open-mindedness and compromise among our fellow citizens across the nation, and by helping them accept the necessary sacrifices for the greater good, I hope to inspire their trust and support for our invaluable Government and Union.

Finally, it is my most fervent prayer to that Almighty Being before whom I now stand, and who has kept us in His hands from the infancy of our Republic to the present day, that He will so overrule all my intentions and actions and inspire the hearts of my fellow-citizens that we may be preserved from dangers of all kinds and continue forever a united and happy people.

Finally, it is my deepest prayer to the Almighty Being before whom I stand now, and who has watched over us since the beginning of our Republic until today, that He will guide all my intentions and actions and inspire the hearts of my fellow citizens so that we may be protected from all kinds of dangers and remain a united and happy people forever.






MARTIN VAN BUREN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1837

[Transcriber's note: The ailing President Jackson and his Vice President Van Buren rode together to the Capitol from the White House in a carriage made of timbers from the U.S.S. Constitution. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. For the first and only time, the election for Vice President had been decided by the Senate, as provided by the Constitution, when the electoral college could not select a winner. The new Vice President, Richard M. Johnson, took his oath in the Senate Chamber.]

[Transcriber's note: The ailing President Jackson and his Vice President Van Buren rode together to the Capitol from the White House in a carriage made of wood from the U.S.S. Constitution. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. For the first and only time, the election for Vice President had been decided by the Senate, as outlined by the Constitution, when the electoral college could not choose a winner. The new Vice President, Richard M. Johnson, took his oath in the Senate Chamber.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

The practice of all my predecessors imposes on me an obligation I cheerfully fulfill—to accompany the first and solemn act of my public trust with an avowal of the principles that will guide me in performing it and an expression of my feelings on assuming a charge so responsible and vast. In imitating their example I tread in the footsteps of illustrious men, whose superiors it is our happiness to believe are not found on the executive calendar of any country. Among them we recognize the earliest and firmest pillars of the Republic—those by whom our national independence was first declared, him who above all others contributed to establish it on the field of battle, and those whose expanded intellect and patriotism constructed, improved, and perfected the inestimable institutions under which we live. If such men in the position I now occupy felt themselves overwhelmed by a sense of gratitude for this the highest of all marks of their country's confidence, and by a consciousness of their inability adequately to discharge the duties of an office so difficult and exalted, how much more must these considerations affect one who can rely on no such claims for favor or forbearance! Unlike all who have preceded me, the Revolution that gave us existence as one people was achieved at the period of my birth; and whilst I contemplate with grateful reverence that memorable event, I feel that I belong to a later age and that I may not expect my countrymen to weigh my actions with the same kind and partial hand.

The practice of all my predecessors puts an obligation on me that I gladly accept—to accompany the first and important act of my public duty with a declaration of the principles that will guide me in fulfilling it and to share my feelings about taking on such a significant and vast responsibility. By following their example, I walk in the footsteps of remarkable individuals, who we are fortunate to believe are unmatched on the executive roster of any nation. Among them, we recognize the foundational figures of the Republic—those who first declared our national independence, the one who did the most to secure it on the battlefield, and those whose wide-ranging intellect and patriotism built, refined, and perfected the invaluable institutions under which we live. If such individuals in the role I now hold felt overwhelmed by gratitude for this highest mark of their country's trust, and by the awareness of their inability to fully meet the challenges of such a difficult and esteemed office, how much more must these feelings resonate with someone who cannot rely on any similar claims for favor or leniency! Unlike all who came before me, the Revolution that united us as one people took place at the time of my birth; while I reflect with deep appreciation on that significant event, I realize that I belong to a later generation and that I cannot expect my fellow citizens to evaluate my actions with the same kindness and bias.

So sensibly, fellow-citizens, do these circumstances press themselves upon me that I should not dare to enter upon my path of duty did I not look for the generous aid of those who will be associated with me in the various and coordinate branches of the Government; did I not repose with unwavering reliance on the patriotism, the intelligence, and the kindness of a people who never yet deserted a public servant honestly laboring their cause; and, above all, did I not permit myself humbly to hope for the sustaining support of an ever-watchful and beneficent Providence.

So reasonably, fellow citizens, do these circumstances weigh on me that I wouldn't dare to embark on my duty if I didn't look forward to the generous support of those who will be working alongside me in the various branches of the Government; if I didn't have unwavering trust in the patriotism, intelligence, and kindness of a people who have never abandoned a public servant sincerely working for their cause; and, above all, if I didn't allow myself to humbly hope for the guiding support of a constantly watchful and kind Providence.

To the confidence and consolation derived from these sources it would be ungrateful not to add those which spring from our present fortunate condition. Though not altogether exempt from embarrassments that disturb our tranquillity at home and threaten it abroad, yet in all the attributes of a great, happy, and flourishing people we stand without a parallel in the world. Abroad we enjoy the respect and, with scarcely an exception, the friendship of every nation; at home, while our Government quietly but efficiently performs the sole legitimate end of political institutions—in doing the greatest good to the greatest number—we present an aggregate of human prosperity surely not elsewhere to be found.

To the confidence and comfort we get from these sources, it's only fair to add those that come from our current fortunate situation. Although we're not completely free from the challenges that disrupt our peace at home and pose threats from abroad, in all the qualities of a great, happy, and thriving nation, we stand unmatched in the world. Internationally, we have the respect and, with hardly any exceptions, the friendship of almost every country; domestically, while our Government quietly but effectively carries out the primary legitimate purpose of political systems—doing the greatest good for the greatest number—we showcase a level of human prosperity that is unlikely to be found anywhere else.

How imperious, then, is the obligation imposed upon every citizen, in his own sphere of action, whether limited or extended, to exert himself in perpetuating a condition of things so singularly happy! All the lessons of history and experience must be lost upon us if we are content to trust alone to the peculiar advantages we happen to possess. Position and climate and the bounteous resources that nature has scattered with so liberal a hand—even the diffused intelligence and elevated character of our people—will avail us nothing if we fail sacredly to uphold those political institutions that were wisely and deliberately formed with reference to every circumstance that could preserve or might endanger the blessings we enjoy. The thoughtful framers of our Constitution legislated for our country as they found it. Looking upon it with the eyes of statesmen and patriots, they saw all the sources of rapid and wonderful prosperity; but they saw also that various habits, opinions and institutions peculiar to the various portions of so vast a region were deeply fixed. Distinct sovereignties were in actual existence, whose cordial union was essential to the welfare and happiness of all. Between many of them there was, at least to some extent, a real diversity of interests, liable to be exaggerated through sinister designs; they differed in size, in population, in wealth, and in actual and prospective resources and power; they varied in the character of their industry and staple productions, and [in some] existed domestic institutions which, unwisely disturbed, might endanger the harmony of the whole. Most carefully were all these circumstances weighed, and the foundations of the new Government laid upon principles of reciprocal concession and equitable compromise. The jealousies which the smaller States might entertain of the power of the rest were allayed by a rule of representation confessedly unequal at the time, and designed forever to remain so. A natural fear that the broad scope of general legislation might bear upon and unwisely control particular interests was counteracted by limits strictly drawn around the action of the Federal authority, and to the people and the States was left unimpaired their sovereign power over the innumerable subjects embraced in the internal government of a just republic, excepting such only as necessarily appertain to the concerns of the whole confederacy or its intercourse as a united community with the other nations of the world.

How urgent is the responsibility that every citizen has, in their own area of influence, whether small or large, to work towards maintaining a situation that is so remarkably positive! All the lessons from history and experience would be wasted on us if we simply rely on the unique advantages we happen to have. Our status, climate, and the plentiful resources that nature generously provides—even the widespread knowledge and high character of our people—will mean nothing if we fail to uphold the political institutions that were thoughtfully and intentionally created to protect the blessings we enjoy. The careful framers of our Constitution designed it based on the state of our country as they found it. Viewing it through the eyes of statesmen and patriots, they recognized all the sources of rapid and remarkable prosperity; but they also acknowledged that the different habits, opinions, and institutions unique to various parts of such a vast region were deeply rooted. Separate governments already existed, and their united cooperation was crucial for the welfare and happiness of everyone. Between many of them, there was, at least to some degree, a genuine difference in interests, which could be exaggerated due to harmful intentions; they varied in size, population, wealth, and actual and potential resources and power; they differed in the nature of their industries and main products, and in some cases, there were domestic institutions that, if disturbed, could threaten the overall harmony. All these factors were carefully considered, and the foundations of the new Government were established on principles of mutual concession and fair compromise. The concerns that the smaller States might have about the power of the larger ones were eased by a representation system that was openly unequal at the time and was meant to remain so. A natural concern that broad federal legislation might unfairly impact specific interests was addressed by strictly defining the limits of Federal power, while leaving the people and the States with their sovereign authority over countless issues within the internal governance of a fair republic, except for those areas that inherently pertain to the interests of the entire confederation or its interactions as a united community with other nations worldwide.

This provident forecast has been verified by time. Half a century, teeming with extraordinary events, and elsewhere producing astonishing results, has passed along, but on our institutions it has left no injurious mark. From a small community we have risen to a people powerful in numbers and in strength; but with our increase has gone hand in hand the progress of just principles. The privileges, civil and religious, of the humblest individual are still sacredly protected at home, and while the valor and fortitude of our people have removed far from us the slightest apprehension of foreign power, they have not yet induced us in a single instance to forget what is right. Our commerce has been extended to the remotest nations; the value and even nature of our productions have been greatly changed; a wide difference has arisen in the relative wealth and resources of every portion of our country; yet the spirit of mutual regard and of faithful adherence to existing compacts has continued to prevail in our councils and never long been absent from our conduct. We have learned by experience a fruitful lesson—that an implicit and undeviating adherence to the principles on which we set out can carry us prosperously onward through all the conflicts of circumstances and vicissitudes inseparable from the lapse of years.

This wise prediction has been proven true over time. Half a century, filled with incredible events and yielding surprising outcomes, has gone by, but it hasn't left any damaging effects on our institutions. From a small community, we've grown into a people who are strong in both numbers and power; but with our growth, we've also progressed in just principles. The rights, both civil and religious, of the least powerful individuals are still safely protected at home, and while the courage and strength of our people have eliminated any fear of foreign dominance, we have never allowed ourselves to forget what is right. Our trade has expanded to the farthest corners of the earth; the value and even the nature of our products have significantly changed; there are now substantial differences in the wealth and resources of each part of our country; yet the spirit of mutual respect and commitment to our agreements has continued to thrive in our discussions and has never been absent from our actions. We've learned an important lesson from experience—that unwavering dedication to the principles we established can lead us successfully through all the challenges and changes that come with the passage of time.

The success that has thus attended our great experiment is in itself a sufficient cause for gratitude, on account of the happiness it has actually conferred and the example it has unanswerably given But to me, my fellow-citizens, looking forward to the far-distant future with ardent prayers and confiding hopes, this retrospect presents a ground for still deeper delight. It impresses on my mind a firm belief that the perpetuity of our institutions depends upon ourselves; that if we maintain the principles on which they were established they are destined to confer their benefits on countless generations yet to come, and that America will present to every friend of mankind the cheering proof that a popular government, wisely formed, is wanting in no element of endurance or strength. Fifty years ago its rapid failure was boldly predicted. Latent and uncontrollable causes of dissolution were supposed to exist even by the wise and good, and not only did unfriendly or speculative theorists anticipate for us the fate of past republics, but the fears of many an honest patriot overbalanced his sanguine hopes. Look back on these forebodings, not hastily but reluctantly made, and see how in every instance they have completely failed.

The success of our great experiment is enough reason to feel grateful, considering the happiness it has genuinely brought and the undeniable example it has set. But for me, my fellow citizens, looking ahead to the distant future with hopeful prayers and confident expectations, this reflection brings even greater joy. It solidifies my belief that the longevity of our institutions relies on us; if we uphold the principles they were built on, they are bound to benefit countless generations to come, and America will show every friend of humanity that a well-formed popular government has all the qualities needed for endurance and strength. Fifty years ago, many boldly predicted its quick failure. Even the wise and good believed there were hidden and uncontrollable causes for its downfall, and not only did unfavorable or speculative thinkers expect us to share the fate of past republics, but many honest patriots' fears overshadowed their hopeful visions. Let’s look back on these predictions—made not lightly, but with hesitation—and see how, in every case, they have utterly failed.

An imperfect experience during the struggles of the Revolution was supposed to warrant the belief that the people would not bear the taxation requisite to discharge an immense public debt already incurred and to pay the necessary expenses of the Government. The cost of two wars has been paid, not only without a murmur, but with unequaled alacrity. No one is now left to doubt that every burden will be cheerfully borne that may be necessary to sustain our civil institutions or guard our honor or welfare. Indeed, all experience has shown that the willingness of the people to contribute to these ends in cases of emergency has uniformly outrun the confidence of their representatives.

An imperfect experience during the struggles of the Revolution was supposed to lead to the belief that the people wouldn't accept the taxes needed to pay off a huge public debt already incurred and cover the essential costs of the Government. The expenses of two wars have been paid, not only without complaint but with remarkable eagerness. No one doubts now that every burden will be willingly accepted if it’s necessary to support our civil institutions or protect our honor and welfare. In fact, all evidence shows that the people’s willingness to contribute to these goals in emergencies has consistently exceeded the confidence of their representatives.

In the early stages of the new Government, when all felt the imposing influence as they recognized the unequaled services of the first President, it was a common sentiment that the great weight of his character could alone bind the discordant materials of our Government together and save us from the violence of contending factions. Since his death nearly forty years are gone. Party exasperation has been often carried to its highest point; the virtue and fortitude of the people have sometimes been greatly tried; yet our system, purified and enhanced in value by all it has encountered, still preserves its spirit of free and fearless discussion, blended with unimpaired fraternal feeling.

In the early days of the new Government, when everyone felt the powerful impact of the first President's unmatched contributions, there was a shared belief that his strong character was the only thing that could unify the conflicting elements of our Government and protect us from the chaos of opposing factions. Nearly forty years have passed since his death. Political tensions have often reached their peak; the integrity and resilience of the people have sometimes been severely tested; yet our system, strengthened and improved by everything it has faced, still maintains its spirit of open and fearless discussion, combined with unwavering brotherly feeling.

The capacity of the people for self-government, and their willingness, from a high sense of duty and without those exhibitions of coercive power so generally employed in other countries, to submit to all needful restraints and exactions of municipal law, have also been favorably exemplified in the history of the American States. Occasionally, it is true, the ardor of public sentiment, outrunning the regular progress of the judicial tribunals or seeking to reach cases not denounced as criminal by the existing law, has displayed itself in a manner calculated to give pain to the friends of free government and to encourage the hopes of those who wish for its overthrow. These occurrences, however, have been far less frequent in our country than in any other of equal population on the globe, and with the diffusion of intelligence it may well be hoped that they will constantly diminish in frequency and violence. The generous patriotism and sound common sense of the great mass of our fellow-citizens will assuredly in time produce this result; for as every assumption of illegal power not only wounds the majesty of the law, but furnishes a pretext for abridging the liberties of the people, the latter have the most direct and permanent interest in preserving the landmarks of social order and maintaining on all occasions the inviolability of those constitutional and legal provisions which they themselves have made.

The ability of people to govern themselves, along with their willingness to comply with necessary rules and demands of local law from a strong sense of duty—without the use of force so often seen in other countries—has been positively demonstrated throughout the history of the American states. It's true that sometimes, public sentiment has surged ahead of the legal system, trying to address issues that the current law doesn't classify as criminal, showing a tendency that could worry supporters of free government and embolden those who want to see it dismantled. However, these instances have been much less common in our country compared to any other nation of similar size, and as knowledge spreads, we can indeed hope that they will continue to decrease in occurrence and severity. The noble patriotism and common sense of the majority of our fellow citizens will surely bring about this change over time; since any claim of illegal power not only undermines the authority of the law but also gives a reason to limit people's freedoms, the public has a compelling and lasting interest in upholding the principles of social order and always safeguarding the constitutional and legal rights they have established.

In a supposed unfitness of our institutions for those hostile emergencies which no country can always avoid their friends found a fruitful source of apprehension, their enemies of hope. While they foresaw less promptness of action than in governments differently formed, they overlooked the far more important consideration that with us war could never be the result of individual or irresponsible will, but must be a measure of redress for injuries sustained voluntarily resorted to by those who were to bear the necessary sacrifice, who would consequently feel an individual interest in the contest, and whose energy would be commensurate with the difficulties to be encountered. Actual events have proved their error; the last war, far from impairing, gave new confidence to our Government, and amid recent apprehensions of a similar conflict we saw that the energies of our country would not be wanting in ample season to vindicate its rights. We may not possess, as we should not desire to possess, the extended and ever-ready military organization of other nations; we may occasionally suffer in the outset for the want of it; but among ourselves all doubt upon this great point has ceased, while a salutary experience will prevent a contrary opinion from inviting aggression from abroad.

In a supposed unsuitability of our institutions for those hostile situations that no country can always avoid, our friends found a source of worry, while our enemies found hope. While they predicted a slower response than in governments structured differently, they missed the much more important point that with us, war could never come from an individual's or irresponsible will. Instead, it must be a response to injuries that those who would bear the necessary sacrifice had voluntarily faced, meaning they would have a personal stake in the conflict and their energy would match the challenges ahead. Actual events have shown their mistake; the last war, rather than weakening us, boosted our Government's confidence, and amidst recent fears of a similar conflict, we saw that our country would not lack the necessary energy to defend its rights. We may not have, nor would we want, the extensive and always-ready military organization of other nations; we might occasionally suffer at first due to this lack; however, within our ranks, all doubt on this crucial issue has vanished, while valuable experience will ensure that a contrary viewpoint does not provoke aggression from abroad.

Certain danger was foretold from the extension of our territory, the multiplication of States, and the increase of population. Our system was supposed to be adapted only to boundaries comparatively narrow. These have been widened beyond conjecture; the members of our Confederacy are already doubled, and the numbers of our people are incredibly augmented. The alleged causes of danger have long surpassed anticipation, but none of the consequences have followed. The power and influence of the Republic have arisen to a height obvious to all mankind; respect for its authority was not more apparent at its ancient than it is at its present limits; new and inexhaustible sources of general prosperity have been opened; the effects of distance have been averted by the inventive genius of our people, developed and fostered by the spirit of our institutions; and the enlarged variety and amount of interests, productions, and pursuits have strengthened the chain of mutual dependence and formed a circle of mutual benefits too apparent ever to be overlooked.

Certain dangers were predicted from the expansion of our territory, the increase in states, and the growing population. Our system was thought to fit only within relatively narrow boundaries. These boundaries have now been stretched beyond imagination; the members of our Confederacy have already doubled, and our population has grown tremendously. The supposed causes of danger have long surpassed expectations, yet none of the predicted consequences have occurred. The power and influence of the Republic have reached a level obvious to all; respect for its authority is as evident now as it was at its earlier boundaries. New and endless sources of general prosperity have emerged; the challenges of distance have been overcome by our people's inventive creativity, nurtured by the spirit of our institutions; and the diverse range and volume of interests, products, and activities have tightened the bonds of mutual dependence and created a circle of mutual benefits too significant to ignore.

In justly balancing the powers of the Federal and State authorities difficulties nearly insurmountable arose at the outset and subsequent collisions were deemed inevitable. Amid these it was scarcely believed possible that a scheme of government so complex in construction could remain uninjured. From time to time embarrassments have certainly occurred; but how just is the confidence of future safety imparted by the knowledge that each in succession has been happily removed! Overlooking partial and temporary evils as inseparable from the practical operation of all human institutions, and looking only to the general result, every patriot has reason to be satisfied. While the Federal Government has successfully performed its appropriate functions in relation to foreign affairs and concerns evidently national, that of every State has remarkably improved in protecting and developing local interests and individual welfare; and if the vibrations of authority have occasionally tended too much toward one or the other, it is unquestionably certain that the ultimate operation of the entire system has been to strengthen all the existing institutions and to elevate our whole country in prosperity and renown.

In trying to balance the powers of the federal and state governments, we faced nearly impossible challenges right from the start, and conflicts were seen as unavoidable. During these times, it was hard to believe that such a complex government structure could withstand damage. There have definitely been challenges along the way; however, the assurance of future safety comes from knowing that each issue has been successfully resolved in turn! If we set aside the minor and temporary problems that come with all human institutions and focus on the overall outcome, every patriot has reason to feel confident. While the federal government has effectively handled its responsibilities related to foreign matters and national issues, each state has significantly improved in protecting and fostering local interests and individual well-being. And even if the balance of authority has sometimes tilted too far in one direction or the other, it is clear that the overall function of the system has served to strengthen all existing institutions and enhance our country's prosperity and reputation.

The last, perhaps the greatest, of the prominent sources of discord and disaster supposed to lurk in our political condition was the institution of domestic slavery. Our forefathers were deeply impressed with the delicacy of this subject, and they treated it with a forbearance so evidently wise that in spite of every sinister foreboding it never until the present period disturbed the tranquillity of our common country. Such a result is sufficient evidence of the justice and the patriotism of their course; it is evidence not to be mistaken that an adherence to it can prevent all embarrassment from this as well as from every other anticipated cause of difficulty or danger. Have not recent events made it obvious to the slightest reflection that the least deviation from this spirit of forbearance is injurious to every interest, that of humanity included? Amidst the violence of excited passions this generous and fraternal feeling has been sometimes disregarded; and standing as I now do before my countrymen, in this high place of honor and of trust, I can not refrain from anxiously invoking my fellow-citizens never to be deaf to its dictates. Perceiving before my election the deep interest this subject was beginning to excite, I believed it a solemn duty fully to make known my sentiments in regard to it, and now, when every motive for misrepresentation has passed away, I trust that they will be candidly weighed and understood. At least they will be my standard of conduct in the path before me. I then declared that if the desire of those of my countrymen who were favorable to my election was gratified "I must go into the Presidential chair the inflexible and uncompromising opponent of every attempt on the part of Congress to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia against the wishes of the slaveholding States, and also with a determination equally decided to resist the slightest interference with it in the States where it exists." I submitted also to my fellow-citizens, with fullness and frankness, the reasons which led me to this determination. The result authorizes me to believe that they have been approved and are confided in by a majority of the people of the United States, including those whom they most immediately affect. It now only remains to add that no bill conflicting with these views can ever receive my constitutional sanction. These opinions have been adopted in the firm belief that they are in accordance with the spirit that actuated the venerated fathers of the Republic, and that succeeding experience has proved them to be humane, patriotic, expedient, honorable, and just. If the agitation of this subject was intended to reach the stability of our institutions, enough has occurred to show that it has signally failed, and that in this as in every other instance the apprehensions of the timid and the hopes of the wicked for the destruction of our Government are again destined to be disappointed. Here and there, indeed, scenes of dangerous excitement have occurred, terrifying instances of local violence have been witnessed, and a reckless disregard of the consequences of their conduct has exposed individuals to popular indignation; but neither masses of the people nor sections of the country have been swerved from their devotion to the bond of union and the principles it has made sacred. It will be ever thus. Such attempts at dangerous agitation may periodically return, but with each the object will be better understood. That predominating affection for our political system which prevails throughout our territorial limits, that calm and enlightened judgment which ultimately governs our people as one vast body, will always be at hand to resist and control every effort, foreign or domestic, which aims or would lead to overthrow our institutions.

The last, possibly the most significant, source of conflict and disaster thought to linger in our political situation was the institution of domestic slavery. Our forefathers were acutely aware of the sensitivity of this issue, and they addressed it with a restraint that was clearly wise. As a result, despite every ominous warning, it never disrupted the peace of our nation until now. This outcome clearly shows the fairness and patriotism of their approach; it proves that sticking to it can avoid issues from this and any other expected sources of trouble. Have recent events not made it clear, upon even the slightest reflection, that any departure from this spirit of restraint harms every interest, including humanity? Amid the turmoil of intense emotions, this noble and brotherly sentiment has sometimes been overlooked. Standing before my fellow citizens in this esteemed position of honor and trust, I cannot help but urgently urge my fellow citizens to always heed its guidance. Recognizing the growing interest in this topic before my election, I felt it was my solemn duty to clearly express my views on it. Now, with all reasons for misrepresentation behind me, I hope that my views will be openly considered and understood. At the very least, they will guide my actions moving forward. I then stated that if I were to satisfy the wishes of those who supported my election, "I must enter the presidency as a firm and unwavering opponent of any attempt by Congress to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia against the wishes of the slaveholding States, and also with an equally strong determination to resist any interference with it in the States where it exists." I also presented to my fellow citizens, transparently and directly, the reasons for my decision. The outcome gives me reason to believe that a majority of the people of the United States, including those directly affected, have approved and trust these views. It remains to add that no bill opposing these beliefs will ever receive my constitutional approval. I have adopted these opinions with the firm belief that they align with the spirit that motivated the respected founders of the Republic and that subsequent experience has shown them to be humane, patriotic, practical, honorable, and just. If the debate over this issue was meant to threaten the stability of our institutions, enough has happened to show it has dramatically failed, and that, as in every other instance, the fears of the cautious and the hopes of the malicious for the destruction of our Government will again be thwarted. Indeed, there have been instances of dangerous excitement, frightening local violence has occurred, and a reckless disregard for the consequences of their actions has led individuals to public outrage. However, neither large groups of people nor parts of the country have strayed from their commitment to unity and the principles that it has sanctified. This will always be the case. Such attempts at dangerous agitation may arise from time to time, but with each one, the goals will be clearer. That strong affection for our political system, which exists throughout our country, and that calm, informed judgment which ultimately governs our people as one vast body, will always be ready to resist and control any effort, whether foreign or domestic, that aims to overthrow our institutions.

What can be more gratifying than such a retrospect as this? We look back on obstacles avoided and dangers overcome, on expectations more than realized and prosperity perfectly secured. To the hopes of the hostile, the fears of the timid, and the doubts of the anxious actual experience has given the conclusive reply. We have seen time gradually dispel every unfavorable foreboding and our Constitution surmount every adverse circumstance dreaded at the outset as beyond control. Present excitement will at all times magnify present dangers, but true philosophy must teach us that none more threatening than the past can remain to be overcome; and we ought (for we have just reason) to entertain an abiding confidence in the stability of our institutions and an entire conviction that if administered in the true form, character, and spirit in which they were established they are abundantly adequate to preserve to us and our children the rich blessings already derived from them, to make our beloved land for a thousand generations that chosen spot where happiness springs from a perfect equality of political rights.

What could be more satisfying than looking back like this? We reflect on obstacles we've avoided and dangers we've overcome, on expectations that have far exceeded our hopes and prosperity that is firmly established. To the worries of those who are hostile, the fears of the timid, and the doubts of the anxious, real experience has provided a final answer. We’ve watched time slowly eliminate every negative prediction, and our Constitution rise above all the challenges we initially feared were out of our control. Present concerns often amplify current dangers, but true understanding should remind us that nothing more threatening than what we've already faced remains to be conquered; and we should, for good reason, maintain a lasting faith in the stability of our institutions and a strong belief that if they're managed in the genuine form, character, and spirit in which they were created, they are more than capable of ensuring that we and our children enjoy the rich blessings they provide, making our beloved country for countless generations the place where happiness flows from true political equality.

For myself, therefore, I desire to declare that the principle that will govern me in the high duty to which my country calls me is a strict adherence to the letter and spirit of the Constitution as it was designed by those who framed it. Looking back to it as a sacred instrument carefully and not easily framed; remembering that it was throughout a work of concession and compromise; viewing it as limited to national objects; regarding it as leaving to the people and the States all power not explicitly parted with, I shall endeavor to preserve, protect, and defend it by anxiously referring to its provision for direction in every action. To matters of domestic concernment which it has intrusted to the Federal Government and to such as relate to our intercourse with foreign nations I shall zealously devote myself; beyond those limits I shall never pass.

For myself, I want to make it clear that the guiding principle for me in the important duty my country has called me to is a strict commitment to the letter and spirit of the Constitution as it was intended by its creators. I see it as a sacred document that was carefully crafted; recognizing it as a product of compromise and concession; understanding it as focused on national issues; and acknowledging that it leaves all powers not explicitly given away to the people and the States. I will strive to preserve, protect, and defend it by closely following its guidelines in every action. I will dedicate myself to domestic matters assigned to the Federal Government and to those related to our interactions with other nations; I will not go beyond those boundaries.

To enter on this occasion into a further or more minute exposition of my views on the various questions of domestic policy would be as obtrusive as it is probably unexpected. Before the suffrages of my countrymen were conferred upon me I submitted to them, with great precision, my opinions on all the most prominent of these subjects. Those opinions I shall endeavor to carry out with my utmost ability.

To delve into a more detailed explanation of my views on various domestic policy issues at this time would be as intrusive as it is likely unexpected. Before my fellow citizens gave me their support, I clearly presented my opinions on all the most significant topics. I will do my best to put those opinions into action.

Our course of foreign policy has been so uniform and intelligible as to constitute a rule of Executive conduct which leaves little to my discretion, unless, indeed, I were willing to run counter to the lights of experience and the known opinions of my constituents. We sedulously cultivate the friendship of all nations as the conditions most compatible with our welfare and the principles of our Government. We decline alliances as adverse to our peace. We desire commercial relations on equal terms, being ever willing to give a fair equivalent for advantages received. We endeavor to conduct our intercourse with openness and sincerity, promptly avowing our objects and seeking to establish that mutual frankness which is as beneficial in the dealings of nations as of men. We have no disposition and we disclaim all right to meddle in disputes, whether internal or foreign, that may molest other countries, regarding them in their actual state as social communities, and preserving a strict neutrality in all their controversies. Well knowing the tried valor of our people and our exhaustless resources, we neither anticipate nor fear any designed aggression; and in the consciousness of our own just conduct we feel a security that we shall never be called upon to exert our determination never to permit an invasion of our rights without punishment or redress.

Our foreign policy has been consistent and clear enough to create a standard for executive action that leaves me little room to make my own choices, unless I want to ignore the lessons learned from experience and the opinions of my constituents. We actively nurture friendships with all nations because we believe this is the best way to ensure our well-being and align with our government’s principles. We avoid forming alliances that could threaten our peace. We seek commercial relationships on equal terms, always prepared to provide a fair exchange for the benefits we receive. We aim to interact with transparency and honesty, clearly stating our goals and striving for the kind of openness that’s helpful in the relationships between nations as well as between people. We have no intention and claim no right to get involved in conflicts, whether they are internal or external, that might trouble other countries. We view them as they are—a collection of social communities—and maintain a strict neutrality in their disputes. Confident in the proven courage of our people and our abundant resources, we neither expect nor fear any intentional threats; and with the assurance of our own fair actions, we feel secure knowing we will never be forced to take action to protect our rights without consequences or remedy.

In approaching, then, in the presence of my assembled countrymen, to make the solemn promise that yet remains, and to pledge myself that I will faithfully execute the office I am about to fill, I bring with me a settled purpose to maintain the institutions of my country, which I trust will atone for the errors I commit.

As I stand here before my fellow citizens to make the solemn promise that I have left to fulfill, and to commit myself to faithfully executing the role I am about to take on, I come with a strong determination to uphold the institutions of my country, which I hope will make up for any mistakes I might make.

In receiving from the people the sacred trust twice confided to my illustrious predecessor, and which he has discharged so faithfully and so well, I know that I can not expect to perform the arduous task with equal ability and success. But united as I have been in his counsels, a daily witness of his exclusive and unsurpassed devotion to his country's welfare, agreeing with him in sentiments which his countrymen have warmly supported, and permitted to partake largely of his confidence, I may hope that somewhat of the same cheering approbation will be found to attend upon my path. For him I but express with my own the wishes of all, that he may yet long live to enjoy the brilliant evening of his well-spent life; and for myself, conscious of but one desire, faithfully to serve my country, I throw myself without fear on its justice and its kindness. Beyond that I only look to the gracious protection of the Divine Being whose strengthening support I humbly solicit, and whom I fervently pray to look down upon us all. May it be among the dispensations of His providence to bless our beloved country with honors and with length of days. May her ways be ways of pleasantness and all her paths be peace!

As I take on the important responsibility that my esteemed predecessor managed so well, I realize I can't expect to handle this challenging job with the same skill and success. However, having worked closely with him, witnessing his unmatched dedication to our country's well-being, sharing his views that have received strong support from his fellow citizens, and having earned a significant amount of his trust, I hope to gain similar encouragement along my journey. For him, I express what everyone desires: that he may continue to enjoy the rewarding later years of his life. As for myself, with just one goal—to serve my country faithfully—I rely on its fairness and kindness. Beyond that, I seek the gracious protection of the Divine Being whose support I humbly ask for and pray will look over all of us. May it be part of His plan to bless our beloved nation with honor and long-lasting peace. May her paths be filled with joy and all her ways be peaceful!






WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 1841

[Transcriber's note: President Harrison has the dual distinction among all the Presidents of giving the longest inaugural speech and of serving the shortest term of office. Known to the public as "Old Tippecanoe," the former general of the Indian campaigns delivered an hour-and-forty-five-minute speech in a snowstorm. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico of the Capitol by Chief Justice Roger Taney. The 68-year-old President stood outside for the entire proceeding, greeted crowds of well-wishers at the White House later that day, and attended several celebrations that evening. One month later he died of pneumonia.]

[Transcriber's note: President Harrison holds the unique record among all Presidents for giving the longest inaugural speech and for serving the shortest term in office. Known to the public as "Old Tippecanoe," the former general from the Indian campaigns delivered a speech that lasted an hour and forty-five minutes during a snowstorm. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The 68-year-old President stood outside for the entire event, greeted crowds of well-wishers at the White House later that day, and attended several celebrations that evening. One month later, he died of pneumonia.]


Called from a retirement which I had supposed was to continue for the residue of my life to fill the chief executive office of this great and free nation, I appear before you, fellow-citizens, to take the oaths which the Constitution prescribes as a necessary qualification for the performance of its duties; and in obedience to a custom coeval with our Government and what I believe to be your expectations I proceed to present to you a summary of the principles which will govern me in the discharge of the duties which I shall be called upon to perform.

Called from a retirement that I thought would last for the rest of my life to take on the top job of this great and free nation, I stand before you, fellow citizens, to take the oaths required by the Constitution as a necessary qualification for carrying out its duties; and following a tradition that has been with our Government since its beginning and what I believe to be your expectations, I will now give you a summary of the principles that will guide me in fulfilling the responsibilities I will be tasked with.

It was the remark of a Roman consul in an early period of that celebrated Republic that a most striking contrast was observable in the conduct of candidates for offices of power and trust before and after obtaining them, they seldom carrying out in the latter case the pledges and promises made in the former. However much the world may have improved in many respects in the lapse of upward of two thousand years since the remark was made by the virtuous and indignant Roman, I fear that a strict examination of the annals of some of the modern elective governments would develop similar instances of violated confidence.

A Roman consul once pointed out that there was a noticeable difference in the behavior of candidates for positions of power and trust before and after they got those positions; they rarely kept the promises and commitments they made earlier. Even though the world has improved in many ways over the past two thousand years since the virtuous and outraged Roman made that observation, I worry that a close look at the records of some modern elected governments would reveal similar cases of broken trust.

Although the fiat of the people has gone forth proclaiming me the Chief Magistrate of this glorious Union, nothing upon their part remaining to be done, it may be thought that a motive may exist to keep up the delusion under which they may be supposed to have acted in relation to my principles and opinions; and perhaps there may be some in this assembly who have come here either prepared to condemn those I shall now deliver, or, approving them, to doubt the sincerity with which they are now uttered. But the lapse of a few months will confirm or dispel their fears. The outline of principles to govern and measures to be adopted by an Administration not yet begun will soon be exchanged for immutable history, and I shall stand either exonerated by my countrymen or classed with the mass of those who promised that they might deceive and flattered with the intention to betray. However strong may be my present purpose to realize the expectations of a magnanimous and confiding people, I too well understand the dangerous temptations to which I shall be exposed from the magnitude of the power which it has been the pleasure of the people to commit to my hands not to place my chief confidence upon the aid of that Almighty Power which has hitherto protected me and enabled me to bring to favorable issues other important but still greatly inferior trusts heretofore confided to me by my country.

Even though the people have officially named me the Chief Magistrate of this great Union, leaving nothing more for them to do, some might think there’s a reason to maintain the illusion about my principles and beliefs; and perhaps there are those in this gathering who have come ready to criticize what I’m about to say, or who, while agreeing with my views, will question the honesty with which I express them now. But in a few months, their concerns will either be confirmed or proven wrong. The outline of the principles and measures that will lead an Administration not yet started will soon become part of undeniable history, and I will either be cleared by my fellow citizens or placed among those who made promises to mislead and flattered with the intent to betray. No matter how determined I am to meet the expectations of a generous and trusting people, I understand too well the serious temptations I will face due to the immense power that the people have entrusted to me not to rely solely on the support of that Almighty Power which has protected me so far and helped me successfully manage other significant but less important responsibilities previously given to me by my country.

The broad foundation upon which our Constitution rests being the people—a breath of theirs having made, as a breath can unmake, change, or modify it—it can be assigned to none of the great divisions of government but to that of democracy. If such is its theory, those who are called upon to administer it must recognize as its leading principle the duty of shaping their measures so as to produce the greatest good to the greatest number. But with these broad admissions, if we would compare the sovereignty acknowledged to exist in the mass of our people with the power claimed by other sovereignties, even by those which have been considered most purely democratic, we shall find a most essential difference. All others lay claim to power limited only by their own will. The majority of our citizens, on the contrary, possess a sovereignty with an amount of power precisely equal to that which has been granted to them by the parties to the national compact, and nothing beyond. We admit of no government by divine right, believing that so far as power is concerned the Beneficent Creator has made no distinction amongst men; that all are upon an equality, and that the only legitimate right to govern is an express grant of power from the governed. The Constitution of the United States is the instrument containing this grant of power to the several departments composing the Government. On an examination of that instrument it will be found to contain declarations of power granted and of power withheld. The latter is also susceptible of division into power which the majority had the right to grant, but which they do not think proper to intrust to their agents, and that which they could not have granted, not being possessed by themselves. In other words, there are certain rights possessed by each individual American citizen which in his compact with the others he has never surrendered. Some of them, indeed, he is unable to surrender, being, in the language of our system, unalienable. The boasted privilege of a Roman citizen was to him a shield only against a petty provincial ruler, whilst the proud democrat of Athens would console himself under a sentence of death for a supposed violation of the national faith—which no one understood and which at times was the subject of the mockery of all—or the banishment from his home, his family, and his country with or without an alleged cause, that it was the act not of a single tyrant or hated aristocracy, but of his assembled countrymen. Far different is the power of our sovereignty. It can interfere with no one's faith, prescribe forms of worship for no one's observance, inflict no punishment but after well-ascertained guilt, the result of investigation under rules prescribed by the Constitution itself. These precious privileges, and those scarcely less important of giving expression to his thoughts and opinions, either by writing or speaking, unrestrained but by the liability for injury to others, and that of a full participation in all the advantages which flow from the Government, the acknowledged property of all, the American citizen derives from no charter granted by his fellow-man. He claims them because he is himself a man, fashioned by the same Almighty hand as the rest of his species and entitled to a full share of the blessings with which He has endowed them. Notwithstanding the limited sovereignty possessed by the people of the United States and the restricted grant of power to the Government which they have adopted, enough has been given to accomplish all the objects for which it was created. It has been found powerful in war, and hitherto justice has been administered, and intimate union effected, domestic tranquillity preserved, and personal liberty secured to the citizen. As was to be expected, however, from the defect of language and the necessarily sententious manner in which the Constitution is written, disputes have arisen as to the amount of power which it has actually granted or was intended to grant.

The foundation of our Constitution is the people—a breath from them can create, change, or modify it. Therefore, it can't be assigned to any major division of government except democracy. If that's the case, those tasked with implementing it must recognize that their main responsibility is to shape their actions to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. However, if we compare the sovereignty recognized in our mass of citizens with the power claimed by other sovereigns, even those deemed most democratic, we will notice a significant difference. Other sovereigns claim power limited only by their own will. In contrast, the majority of our citizens possess a sovereignty equal to the power granted to them by the parties to the national agreement, and nothing more. We reject any government based on divine right, believing that when it comes to power, the Beneficent Creator has made no distinctions among men—that all are equal. The only rightful authority to govern comes from an explicit grant of power from the governed. The Constitution of the United States is the document that contains this power grant to the various government branches. Upon examining that document, you will find declarations of both granted and withheld powers. The latter can be divided into powers that the majority had the right to grant but choose not to give to their representatives, and those they couldn't have granted because they don't possess them. In other words, certain rights belong to every individual American citizen that he has never surrendered in his agreement with others. Some of these rights he is even unable to surrender, as they are, in our system's terms, unalienable. The celebrated privilege of a Roman citizen served only as protection against a minor local ruler, while the proud democrat of Athens would try to comfort himself under a death sentence for an alleged violation of national faith—which was often mocked by all—or for being banished from his home, family, and country, with or without justification. This action wasn't just from a single tyrant or a hated aristocracy, but from his assembled fellow citizens. Our sovereignty works differently. It can't interfere with anyone's beliefs, impose worship forms for anyone to follow, or punish anyone without established guilt resulting from an investigation under rules set by the Constitution itself. These cherished privileges, along with the equally important right to express thoughts and opinions, whether in writing or speaking—limited only by the potential for harm to others and the right to fully participate in all the benefits that come from the Government, which belongs to everyone—are not granted by any charter from fellow humans. He asserts these rights simply because he is human, created by the same Almighty hand as the rest of humanity and deserving of a full share of the blessings He has given them. Despite the limited sovereignty of the people of the United States and the constrained power granted to the Government they have established, enough power has been given to fulfill all the purposes for which it was created. It has proven effective in war, justice has been delivered, a close union has been formed, domestic peace has been maintained, and personal liberty has been secured for the citizen. However, as was expected due to the limitations of language and the need for concise expression in the Constitution, disagreements have arisen regarding the extent of power actually granted or intended to be granted.

This is more particularly the case in relation to that part of the instrument which treats of the legislative branch, and not only as regards the exercise of powers claimed under a general clause giving that body the authority to pass all laws necessary to carry into effect the specified powers, but in relation to the latter also. It is, however, consolatory to reflect that most of the instances of alleged departure from the letter or spirit of the Constitution have ultimately received the sanction of a majority of the people. And the fact that many of our statesmen most distinguished for talent and patriotism have been at one time or other of their political career on both sides of each of the most warmly disputed questions forces upon us the inference that the errors, if errors there were, are attributable to the intrinsic difficulty in many instances of ascertaining the intentions of the framers of the Constitution rather than the influence of any sinister or unpatriotic motive. But the great danger to our institutions does not appear to me to be in a usurpation by the Government of power not granted by the people, but by the accumulation in one of the departments of that which was assigned to others. Limited as are the powers which have been granted, still enough have been granted to constitute a despotism if concentrated in one of the departments. This danger is greatly heightened, as it has been always observable that men are less jealous of encroachments of one department upon another than upon their own reserved rights. When the Constitution of the United States first came from the hands of the Convention which formed it, many of the sternest republicans of the day were alarmed at the extent of the power which had been granted to the Federal Government, and more particularly of that portion which had been assigned to the executive branch. There were in it features which appeared not to be in harmony with their ideas of a simple representative democracy or republic, and knowing the tendency of power to increase itself, particularly when exercised by a single individual, predictions were made that at no very remote period the Government would terminate in virtual monarchy. It would not become me to say that the fears of these patriots have been already realized; but as I sincerely believe that the tendency of measures and of men's opinions for some years past has been in that direction, it is, I conceive, strictly proper that I should take this occasion to repeat the assurances I have heretofore given of my determination to arrest the progress of that tendency if it really exists and restore the Government to its pristine health and vigor, as far as this can be effected by any legitimate exercise of the power placed in my hands.

This is especially true regarding the part of the document that addresses the legislative branch, not only concerning the exercise of powers claimed under a general clause that allows this body to pass all laws necessary to implement the specified powers but also regarding the latter itself. However, it is reassuring to note that most of the instances of supposed deviation from the letter or spirit of the Constitution have ultimately received approval from a majority of the people. Furthermore, the fact that many of our most notable statesmen, recognized for their talent and patriotism, have at one time or another in their political careers occupied both sides of the most hotly contested issues leads us to conclude that any errors, if they existed, are due to the inherent difficulty in often determining the intentions of the authors of the Constitution rather than the influence of any malicious or unpatriotic motives. Yet, the significant threat to our institutions does not seem to stem from the Government usurping powers not granted by the people but rather from the accumulation of power in one department that was originally assigned to others. Although the powers granted are limited, they are still sufficient to create a despotism if concentrated in a single department. This danger is amplified because people tend to be less vigilant about encroachments by one department onto another than they are about violations of their own reserved rights. When the U.S. Constitution was first drafted by the Convention, many of the staunch republicans of the time were concerned about the extent of power granted to the Federal Government, particularly to the executive branch. It included elements that appeared to conflict with their vision of a straightforward representative democracy or republic, and recognizing how power tends to expand, especially when held by an individual, they predicted that the Government would eventually devolve into an effective monarchy. While I can't claim that the fears of these patriots have already been realized, I genuinely believe that the trends in policy and public opinion in recent years have been moving in that direction. Therefore, I think it's entirely appropriate to take this opportunity to reaffirm my commitment to stop this trend if it truly exists and to restore the Government to its original health and strength, as far as this can be achieved through any legitimate exercise of the power given to me.

I proceed to state in as summary a manner as I can my opinion of the sources of the evils which have been so extensively complained of and the correctives which may be applied. Some of the former are unquestionably to be found in the defects of the Constitution; others, in my judgment, are attributable to a misconstruction of some of its provisions. Of the former is the eligibility of the same individual to a second term of the Presidency. The sagacious mind of Mr. Jefferson early saw and lamented this error, and attempts have been made, hitherto without success, to apply the amendatory power of the States to its correction. As, however, one mode of correction is in the power of every President, and consequently in mine, it would be useless, and perhaps invidious, to enumerate the evils of which, in the opinion of many of our fellow-citizens, this error of the sages who framed the Constitution may have been the source and the bitter fruits which we are still to gather from it if it continues to disfigure our system. It may be observed, however, as a general remark, that republics can commit no greater error than to adopt or continue any feature in their systems of government which may be calculated to create or increase the lover of power in the bosoms of those to whom necessity obliges them to commit the management of their affairs; and surely nothing is more likely to produce such a state of mind than the long continuance of an office of high trust. Nothing can be more corrupting, nothing more destructive of all those noble feelings which belong to the character of a devoted republican patriot. When this corrupting passion once takes possession of the human mind, like the love of gold it becomes insatiable. It is the never-dying worm in his bosom, grows with his growth and strengthens with the declining years of its victim. If this is true, it is the part of wisdom for a republic to limit the service of that officer at least to whom she has intrusted the management of her foreign relations, the execution of her laws, and the command of her armies and navies to a period so short as to prevent his forgetting that he is the accountable agent, not the principal; the servant, not the master. Until an amendment of the Constitution can be effected public opinion may secure the desired object. I give my aid to it by renewing the pledge heretofore given that under no circumstances will I consent to serve a second term.

I want to express, as briefly as possible, my views on the sources of the issues that have been widely discussed and the solutions that might be applied. Some of these issues clearly stem from flaws in the Constitution; others, in my opinion, arise from a misinterpretation of certain provisions. One significant flaw is allowing the same person to serve a second term as President. Mr. Jefferson recognized and regretted this mistake early on, and there have been unsuccessful attempts to use the States' amendment power to fix it. However, since one way to correct this lies within the authority of every President, including myself, it seems pointless, and perhaps undesirable, to list the problems that many of our fellow citizens believe this constitutional oversight has caused, and the negative consequences we will continue to face if we don’t address it. It can be noted, as a general observation, that republics can make no greater mistake than to adopt or maintain any aspect of governance that may create or increase the desire for power in those to whom they must entrust the management of public affairs. Nothing is more likely to foster such a mindset than holding a position of significant power for an extended period. This situation can be extremely corrupting and destructive to the noble qualities that define a true republican patriot. Once this corrupting desire takes hold, similar to an insatiable greed for wealth, it becomes a relentless obsession. It is the persistent burden in one's heart, growing alongside the individual and strengthening as they age. If this is the case, it is wise for a republic to limit the term of the individual in charge of managing foreign relations, enforcing laws, and commanding the military to a duration short enough to remind them that they are the accountable agent, not the principal; the servant, not the master. Until an amendment to the Constitution can be made, public opinion may achieve the necessary change. I support this by reiterating my previous promise that under no circumstances will I agree to serve a second term.

But if there is danger to public liberty from the acknowledged defects of the Constitution in the want of limit to the continuance of the Executive power in the same hands, there is, I apprehend, not much less from a misconstruction of that instrument as it regards the powers actually given. I can not conceive that by a fair construction any or either of its provisions would be found to constitute the President a part of the legislative power. It can not be claimed from the power to recommend, since, although enjoined as a duty upon him, it is a privilege which he holds in common with every other citizen; and although there may be something more of confidence in the propriety of the measures recommended in the one case than in the other, in the obligations of ultimate decision there can be no difference. In the language of the Constitution, "all the legislative powers" which it grants "are vested in the Congress of the United States." It would be a solecism in language to say that any portion of these is not included in the whole.

But if there is a threat to public freedom from the recognized flaws in the Constitution due to the lack of limits on how long Executive power can stay in the same hands, I believe there is just as much risk from misinterpreting that document regarding the powers it actually grants. I can’t imagine that a fair interpretation would find any part of its provisions making the President a part of the legislative power. It can’t be argued from the power to recommend, because, although it’s a duty assigned to him, it’s a privilege he shares with every other citizen; and while there might be more trust in the appropriateness of the recommendations in one case compared to the other, there’s no difference in the ultimate responsibility for decisions. As stated in the Constitution, "all the legislative powers" it grants "are vested in the Congress of the United States." It would be a misuse of language to say that any part of these powers is not included in the whole.

It may be said, indeed, that the Constitution has given to the Executive the power to annul the acts of the legislative body by refusing to them his assent. So a similar power has necessarily resulted from that instrument to the judiciary, and yet the judiciary forms no part of the Legislature. There is, it is true, this difference between these grants of power: The Executive can put his negative upon the acts of the Legislature for other cause than that of want of conformity to the Constitution, whilst the judiciary can only declare void those which violate that instrument. But the decision of the judiciary is final in such a case, whereas in every instance where the veto of the Executive is applied it may be overcome by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses of Congress. The negative upon the acts of the legislative by the executive authority, and that in the hands of one individual, would seem to be an incongruity in our system. Like some others of a similar character, however, it appears to be highly expedient, and if used only with the forbearance and in the spirit which was intended by its authors it may be productive of great good and be found one of the best safeguards to the Union. At the period of the formation of the Constitution the principle does not appear to have enjoyed much favor in the State governments. It existed but in two, and in one of these there was a plural executive. If we would search for the motives which operated upon the purely patriotic and enlightened assembly which framed the Constitution for the adoption of a provision so apparently repugnant to the leading democratic principle that the majority should govern, we must reject the idea that they anticipated from it any benefit to the ordinary course of legislation. They knew too well the high degree of intelligence which existed among the people and the enlightened character of the State legislatures not to have the fullest confidence that the two bodies elected by them would be worthy representatives of such constituents, and, of course, that they would require no aid in conceiving and maturing the measures which the circumstances of the country might require. And it is preposterous to suppose that a thought could for a moment have been entertained that the President, placed at the capital, in the center of the country, could better understand the wants and wishes of the people than their own immediate representatives, who spend a part of every year among them, living with them, often laboring with them, and bound to them by the triple tie of interest, duty, and affection. To assist or control Congress, then, in its ordinary legislation could not, I conceive, have been the motive for conferring the veto power on the President. This argument acquires additional force from the fact of its never having been thus used by the first six Presidents—and two of them were members of the Convention, one presiding over its deliberations and the other bearing a larger share in consummating the labors of that august body than any other person. But if bills were never returned to Congress by either of the Presidents above referred to upon the ground of their being inexpedient or not as well adapted as they might be to the wants of the people, the veto was applied upon that of want of conformity to the Constitution or because errors had been committed from a too hasty enactment.

It can be said that the Constitution gives the Executive the power to reject the actions of the legislative body by withholding approval. Similarly, a related power has emerged for the judiciary, even though it is not part of the Legislature. There is, however, a key difference between these powers: the Executive can veto legislative actions for reasons beyond just inconsistency with the Constitution, while the judiciary can only declare laws invalid if they violate the Constitution. The judiciary's decision in these cases is final, whereas the Executive's veto can be overridden by a two-thirds vote from both Houses of Congress. Having one individual in the executive authority holding the power to veto legislation seems out of place in our system. Yet, like some other similar powers, it appears to be quite necessary, and if used with the restraint and purpose intended by its creators, it could be very beneficial and serve as an important safeguard for the Union. During the time the Constitution was formed, the idea of such a power was not very popular in state governments. It existed in only two states, one of which had a plural executive. If we want to understand the reasons behind the choice made by the dedicated and informed assembly that drafted the Constitution to include a provision seemingly opposed to the key democratic principle of majority rule, we must dismiss the notion that they expected it to benefit the routine legislative process. They were fully aware of the intelligence of the people and the knowledgeable nature of the state legislatures to have complete confidence in the two bodies elected by them being capable representatives of their constituents, so they would not need assistance in developing and refining the measures required by the circumstances of the country. It is absurd to think that anyone believed the President, situated at the capital and at the heart of the country, could better understand the needs and desires of the people than their own direct representatives, who spend part of every year with them, live among them, often work alongside them, and are connected to them through a strong bond of interest, duty, and affection. Thus, I don't believe the intention behind granting the veto power to the President was to help or control Congress in its regular legislation. This point is reinforced by the fact that the first six Presidents never used the veto in that way—two of whom were members of the Constitutional Convention, with one leading its discussions and the other having a major role in finalizing the work of that distinguished group. However, although those Presidents never returned bills to Congress arguing they were inappropriate or not well-suited to the people's needs, they did use the veto when bills did not comply with the Constitution or had errors due to rushed passage.

There is another ground for the adoption of the veto principle, which had probably more influence in recommending it to the Convention than any other. I refer to the security which it gives to the just and equitable action of the Legislature upon all parts of the Union. It could not but have occurred to the Convention that in a country so extensive, embracing so great a variety of soil and climate, and consequently of products, and which from the same causes must ever exhibit a great difference in the amount of the population of its various sections, calling for a great diversity in the employments of the people, that the legislation of the majority might not always justly regard the rights and interests of the minority, and that acts of this character might be passed under an express grant by the words of the Constitution, and therefore not within the competency of the judiciary to declare void; that however enlightened and patriotic they might suppose from past experience the members of Congress might be, and however largely partaking, in the general, of the liberal feelings of the people, it was impossible to expect that bodies so constituted should not sometimes be controlled by local interests and sectional feelings. It was proper, therefore, to provide some umpire from whose situation and mode of appointment more independence and freedom from such influences might be expected. Such a one was afforded by the executive department constituted by the Constitution. A person elected to that high office, having his constituents in every section, State, and subdivision of the Union, must consider himself bound by the most solemn sanctions to guard, protect, and defend the rights of all and of every portion, great or small, from the injustice and oppression of the rest. I consider the veto power, therefore, given by the Constitution to the Executive of the United States solely as a conservative power, to be used only first, to protect the Constitution from violation; secondly, the people from the effects of hasty legislation where their will has been probably disregarded or not well understood, and, thirdly, to prevent the effects of combinations violative of the rights of minorities. In reference to the second of these objects I may observe that I consider it the right and privilege of the people to decide disputed points of the Constitution arising from the general grant of power to Congress to carry into effect the powers expressly given; and I believe with Mr. Madison that "repeated recognitions under varied circumstances in acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the Government, accompanied by indications in different modes of the concurrence of the general will of the nation," as affording to the President sufficient authority for his considering such disputed points as settled.

There’s another reason for adopting the veto principle, which likely had more influence in recommending it to the Convention than anything else. I’m talking about the security it provides for fair and just actions of the Legislature across all parts of the Union. The Convention surely recognized that in such a large country, with a diverse range of soils and climates — and therefore products — along with significant differences in the population across various regions that demand different kinds of work, the legislation led by the majority might not always fairly consider the rights and interests of the minority. Acts like these could easily be passed under explicit permission in the Constitution and would therefore not be within the judiciary’s power to declare void. No matter how enlightened and patriotic they might assume members of Congress to be based on past experience, and regardless of how much they generally aligned with the liberal sentiments of the people, it was unrealistic to expect that bodies structured this way wouldn’t occasionally be influenced by local interests and sectional loyalties. Thus, it was important to establish an impartial mediator from whom greater independence and freedom from such influences could be expected. This was provided by the executive branch formed by the Constitution. A person elected to this high office, who has constituents in every area, state, and subdivision of the Union, must feel a deep obligation to safeguard, protect, and defend the rights of all, no matter how small or large, from the injustice and oppression of others. Therefore, I view the veto power granted by the Constitution to the Executive of the United States as primarily a conservative power, to be used first to protect the Constitution from being violated; secondly, to protect the people from the consequences of rushed legislation where their will has likely been overlooked or misunderstood; and thirdly, to defend against actions that violate minority rights. Regarding the second of these goals, I’d like to point out that I see it as the right and privilege of the people to resolve disputed constitutional issues stemming from Congress’s general grant of power to exercise the expressly given powers; and I agree with Mr. Madison that "repeated recognitions under varied circumstances in acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the Government, accompanied by indications in different modes of the concurrence of the general will of the nation," provide the President with enough authority to treat these disputed points as settled.

Upward of half a century has elapsed since the adoption of the present form of government. It would be an object more highly desirable than the gratification of the curiosity of speculative statesmen if its precise situation could be ascertained, a fair exhibit made of the operations of each of its departments, of the powers which they respectively claim and exercise, of the collisions which have occurred between them or between the whole Government and those of the States or either of them. We could then compare our actual condition after fifty years' trial of our system with what it was in the commencement of its operations and ascertain whether the predictions of the patriots who opposed its adoption or the confident hopes of its advocates have been best realized. The great dread of the former seems to have been that the reserved powers of the States would be absorbed by those of the Federal Government and a consolidated power established, leaving to the States the shadow only of that independent action for which they had so zealously contended and on the preservation of which they relied as the last hope of liberty. Without denying that the result to which they looked with so much apprehension is in the way of being realized, it is obvious that they did not clearly see the mode of its accomplishment. The General Government has seized upon none of the reserved rights of the States. AS far as any open warfare may have gone, the State authorities have amply maintained their rights. To a casual observer our system presents no appearance of discord between the different members which compose it. Even the addition of many new ones has produced no jarring. They move in their respective orbits in perfect harmony with the central head and with each other. But there is still an undercurrent at work by which, if not seasonably checked, the worst apprehensions of our antifederal patriots will be realized, and not only will the State authorities be overshadowed by the great increase of power in the executive department of the General Government, but the character of that Government, if not its designation, be essentially and radically changed. This state of things has been in part effected by causes inherent in the Constitution and in part by the never-failing tendency of political power to increase itself. By making the President the sole distributer of all the patronage of the Government the framers of the Constitution do not appear to have anticipated at how short a period it would become a formidable instrument to control the free operations of the State governments. Of trifling importance at first, it had early in Mr. Jefferson's Administration become so powerful as to create great alarm in the mind of that patriot from the potent influence it might exert in controlling the freedom of the elective franchise. If such could have then been the effects of its influence, how much greater must be the danger at this time, quadrupled in amount as it certainly is and more completely under the control of the Executive will than their construction of their powers allowed or the forbearing characters of all the early Presidents permitted them to make. But it is not by the extent of its patronage alone that the executive department has become dangerous, but by the use which it appears may be made of the appointing power to bring under its control the whole revenues of the country. The Constitution has declared it to be the duty of the President to see that the laws are executed, and it makes him the Commander in Chief of the Armies and Navy of the United States. If the opinion of the most approved writers upon that species of mixed government which in modern Europe is termed monarchy in contradistinction to despotism is correct, there was wanting no other addition to the powers of our Chief Magistrate to stamp a monarchical character on our Government but the control of the public finances; and to me it appears strange indeed that anyone should doubt that the entire control which the President possesses over the officers who have the custody of the public money, by the power of removal with or without cause, does, for all mischievous purposes at least, virtually subject the treasure also to his disposal. The first Roman Emperor, in his attempt to seize the sacred treasure, silenced the opposition of the officer to whose charge it had been committed by a significant allusion to his sword. By a selection of political instruments for the care of the public money a reference to their commissions by a President would be quite as effectual an argument as that of Caesar to the Roman knight. I am not insensible of the great difficulty that exists in drawing a proper plan for the safe-keeping and disbursement of the public revenues, and I know the importance which has been attached by men of great abilities and patriotism to the divorce, as it is called, of the Treasury from the banking institutions It is not the divorce which is complained of, but the unhallowed union of the Treasury with the executive department, which has created such extensive alarm. To this danger to our republican institutions and that created by the influence given to the Executive through the instrumentality of the Federal officers I propose to apply all the remedies which may be at my command. It was certainly a great error in the framers of the Constitution not to have made the officer at the head of the Treasury Department entirely independent of the Executive. He should at least have been removable only upon the demand of the popular branch of the Legislature. I have determined never to remove a Secretary of the Treasury without communicating all the circumstances attending such removal to both Houses of Congress.

More than fifty years have passed since the current form of government was adopted. It would be even more useful than just satisfying the curiosity of theorist politicians if we could determine its exact state, providing a clear view of how each department operates, the powers they claim and exercise, and any conflicts that have arisen either among them or between the federal government and the states. We could then compare our current situation, after fifty years of trial, with how things were at the beginning and see if the fears of the patriots who opposed its adoption or the confident hopes of its supporters have turned out to be more accurate. The main concern of the former seems to have been that the states' reserved powers would be taken over by the federal government, resulting in a consolidated power that would leave the states with only the semblance of the independent action they had fought so hard for, and upon which they relied as the last hope for liberty. While it cannot be denied that the outcome they feared is on track to being realized, it is clear that they did not fully understand how it would happen. The federal government has not seized any of the reserved rights of the states. As far as any open conflict has gone, state authorities have adequately maintained their rights. To an outside observer, our system appears to function without discord among its various components. Even with the addition of many new states, there has been no dissonance. They move in their respective roles in perfect harmony with the central government and with each other. However, there is still a troubling undercurrent at work that, if not addressed promptly, could bring the worst fears of our anti-federalists to life. Not only will the state authorities be overshadowed by the growing power of the executive branch of the federal government, but the nature of that government, if not its name, will be fundamentally and radically altered. This situation has been partly caused by inherent factors in the Constitution and partly by the persistent tendency of political power to amplify itself. By making the President the sole distributor of all government patronage, the framers of the Constitution did not seem to foresee how quickly it would become a powerful tool to control the actions of state governments. Initially of minor importance, by the time of Mr. Jefferson's administration it had gained such power that it caused significant concern for that patriot due to the influence it could exert over the electoral process. If that was the effect of its influence back then, how much greater is the danger now, as it has increased fourfold and is more fully controlled by the Executive than their interpretation of their powers allowed or the restrained behavior of the early Presidents permitted. But it is not just the extent of its patronage that has made the executive branch dangerous; it’s also the use of the appointing power to control the nation’s entire revenues. The Constitution states that it is the President's duty to ensure that laws are executed, and it designates him as the Commander in Chief of the Armies and Navy of the United States. If the views of respected writers on mixed governments, which are termed monarchies in contrast to despotism in modern Europe, are accurate, then the only additional power necessary for our Chief Magistrate to give our government a monarchical character would be control over public finances. To me, it seems strange that anyone would doubt that the complete control the President has over the officials who manage public funds, given his power to remove them with or without cause, effectively places the nation's treasury at his disposal for all harmful intents. The first Roman Emperor, in his attempt to seize the sacred treasury, silenced the opposing officer in charge with a significant reference to his sword. By selecting political appointees to handle public money, a reference to their commissions by a President would be just as effective an argument as Caesar's to the Roman knight. I am fully aware of the considerable challenge in creating a proper plan for the secure management and disbursement of public revenues, and I recognize the importance placed by highly capable and patriotic individuals on separating the Treasury from banking institutions. It is not the separation that is under scrutiny, but the inappropriate merger of the Treasury with the executive branch that has raised such alarm. To address the threat to our republican institutions, as well as the influence granted to the Executive through federal officers, I intend to implement all available remedies. It was indeed a grave mistake on the part of the framers of the Constitution not to make the head of the Treasury Department completely independent of the Executive. He should at the very least have been removable only at the request of the popular branch of the Legislature. I have decided never to remove a Secretary of the Treasury without informing both Houses of Congress about all circumstances surrounding such a removal.

The influence of the Executive in controlling the freedom of the elective franchise through the medium of the public officers can be effectually checked by renewing the prohibition published by Mr. Jefferson forbidding their interference in elections further than giving their own votes, and their own independence secured by an assurance of perfect immunity in exercising this sacred privilege of freemen under the dictates of their own unbiased judgments. Never with my consent shall an officer of the people, compensated for his services out of their pockets, become the pliant instrument of Executive will.

The Executive's power to control the freedom of voting through public officials can be effectively limited by reinstating the ban issued by Mr. Jefferson that prevents their involvement in elections beyond casting their own votes. Their independence must be guaranteed by ensuring they can exercise this fundamental right freely, guided only by their own impartial judgments. I will never allow a public official, paid by the people, to become a submissive tool of the Executive's desires.

There is no part of the means placed in the hands of the Executive which might be used with greater effect for unhallowed purposes than the control of the public press. The maxim which our ancestors derived from the mother country that "the freedom of the press is the great bulwark of civil and religious liberty" is one of the most precious legacies which they have left us. We have learned, too, from our own as well as the experience of other countries, that golden shackles, by whomsoever or by whatever pretense imposed, are as fatal to it as the iron bonds of despotism. The presses in the necessary employment of the Government should never be used "to clear the guilty or to varnish crime." A decent and manly examination of the acts of the Government should be not only tolerated, but encouraged.

There’s no part of the power given to the Executive that could be used more effectively for bad purposes than controlling the public press. The saying our ancestors took from the mother country that "the freedom of the press is the great defense of civil and religious liberty" is one of the most valuable gifts they’ve left us. We’ve also learned, both from our own experience and from that of other countries, that golden shackles, no matter who imposes them or under what pretense, are just as deadly to it as the iron chains of tyranny. The presses that the Government needs to operate should never be used "to clear the guilty or to cover up crime." A fair and honest examination of the Government's actions should not only be allowed but also encouraged.

Upon another occasion I have given my opinion at some length upon the impropriety of Executive interference in the legislation of Congress—that the article in the Constitution making it the duty of the President to communicate information and authorizing him to recommend measures was not intended to make him the source in legislation, and, in particular, that he should never be looked to for schemes of finance. It would be very strange, indeed, that the Constitution should have strictly forbidden one branch of the Legislature from interfering in the origination of such bills and that it should be considered proper that an altogether different department of the Government should be permitted to do so. Some of our best political maxims and opinions have been drawn from our parent isle. There are others, however, which can not be introduced in our system without singular incongruity and the production of much mischief, and this I conceive to be one. No matter in which of the houses of Parliament a bill may originate nor by whom introduced—a minister or a member of the opposition—by the fiction of law, or rather of constitutional principle, the sovereign is supposed to have prepared it agreeably to his will and then submitted it to Parliament for their advice and consent. Now the very reverse is the case here, not only with regard to the principle, but the forms prescribed by the Constitution. The principle certainly assigns to the only body constituted by the Constitution (the legislative body) the power to make laws, and the forms even direct that the enactment should be ascribed to them. The Senate, in relation to revenue bills, have the right to propose amendments, and so has the Executive by the power given him to return them to the House of Representatives with his objections. It is in his power also to propose amendments in the existing revenue laws, suggested by his observations upon their defective or injurious operation. But the delicate duty of devising schemes of revenue should be left where the Constitution has placed it—with the immediate representatives of the people. For similar reasons the mode of keeping the public treasure should be prescribed by them, and the further removed it may be from the control of the Executive the more wholesome the arrangement and the more in accordance with republican principle.

On another occasion, I've shared my thoughts in detail about the inappropriateness of Executive interference in Congress's legislation—that the Constitution's article requiring the President to share information and suggest measures wasn’t meant to make him a source of legislation, particularly when it comes to financial plans. It would be quite odd if the Constitution strictly prohibited one branch of the Legislature from initiating such bills while allowing a completely different branch of the Government to do so. Some of our best political principles and ideas have come from our parent country. However, there are others that cannot be integrated into our system without causing significant awkwardness and harm, and I believe this is one of them. It doesn’t matter which house of Parliament a bill starts in or who introduces it—a minister or an opposition member—by legal fiction, or rather constitutional principle, it is assumed that the sovereign prepared it in accordance with his will and then submitted it to Parliament for their input and approval. Here, however, the opposite is true, not only regarding the principle but also the forms outlined by the Constitution. The principle definitely assigns the power to make laws to the only body established by the Constitution (the legislative body), and the forms explicitly state that the enactment should be credited to them. The Senate has the right to propose amendments regarding revenue bills, and so does the Executive, who is granted the power to return them to the House of Representatives with his objections. He also has the authority to suggest changes to existing revenue laws based on his observations of their shortcomings or harmful effects. However, the sensitive task of creating revenue plans should remain where the Constitution intended it to be—with the direct representatives of the people. For similar reasons, the method of managing public funds should be determined by them, and the further this responsibility is from the control of the Executive, the healthier and more aligned with republican principles the arrangement will be.

Connected with this subject is the character of the currency. The idea of making it exclusively metallic, however well intended, appears to me to be fraught with more fatal consequences than any other scheme having no relation to the personal rights of the citizens that has ever been devised. If any single scheme could produce the effect of arresting at once that mutation of condition by which thousands of our most indigent fellow-citizens by their industry and enterprise are raised to the possession of wealth, that is the one. If there is one measure better calculated than another to produce that state of things so much deprecated by all true republicans, by which the rich are daily adding to their hoards and the poor sinking deeper into penury, it is an exclusive metallic currency. Or if there is a process by which the character of the country for generosity and nobleness of feeling may be destroyed by the great increase and neck toleration of usury, it is an exclusive metallic currency.

Connected to this topic is the nature of the currency. The idea of making it entirely metallic, no matter how well-intentioned, seems to me to carry more devastating consequences than any other plan unrelated to the personal rights of citizens that has ever been proposed. If there's a single plan that could instantly halt the change in circumstances by which thousands of our most disadvantaged fellow citizens rise to wealth through their hard work and initiative, this is it. If there's one approach more likely than any other to create a situation that all true republicans dread—where the rich keep accumulating wealth and the poor sink further into poverty—it’s an exclusive metallic currency. And if there’s a way to undermine the country's reputation for generosity and noble feelings through the widespread acceptance of usury, it’s an exclusive metallic currency.

Amongst the other duties of a delicate character which the President is called upon to perform is the supervision of the government of the Territories of the United States. Those of them which are destined to become members of our great political family are compensated by their rapid progress from infancy to manhood for the partial and temporary deprivation of their political rights. It is in this District only where American citizens are to be found who under a settled policy are deprived of many important political privileges without any inspiring hope as to the future. Their only consolation under circumstances of such deprivation is that of the devoted exterior guards of a camp—that their sufferings secure tranquillity and safety within. Are there any of their countrymen, who would subject them to greater sacrifices, to any other humiliations than those essentially necessary to the security of the object for which they were thus separated from their fellow-citizens? Are their rights alone not to be guaranteed by the application of those great principles upon which all our constitutions are founded? We are told by the greatest of British orators and statesmen that at the commencement of the War of the Revolution the most stupid men in England spoke of "their American subjects." Are there, indeed, citizens of any of our States who have dreamed of their subjects in the District of Columbia? Such dreams can never be realized by any agency of mine. The people of the District of Columbia are not the subjects of the people of the States, but free American citizens. Being in the latter condition when the Constitution was formed, no words used in that instrument could have been intended to deprive them of that character. If there is anything in the great principle of unalienable rights so emphatically insisted upon in our Declaration of Independence, they could neither make nor the United States accept a surrender of their liberties and become the subjects—in other words, the slaves—of their former fellow-citizens. If this be true—and it will scarcely be denied by anyone who has a correct idea of his own rights as an American citizen—the grant to Congress of exclusive jurisdiction in the District of Columbia can be interpreted, so far as respects the aggregate people of the United States, as meaning nothing more than to allow to Congress the controlling power necessary to afford a free and safe exercise of the functions assigned to the General Government by the Constitution. In all other respects the legislation of Congress should be adapted to their peculiar position and wants and be conformable with their deliberate opinions of their own interests.

Among the other sensitive responsibilities the President must handle is overseeing the government of the United States Territories. Those territories that are expected to join our great political family are compensated for their partial and temporary loss of political rights by their rapid development from infancy to maturity. It's only in this District that American citizens are found who, under established policy, are denied many important political privileges without any hopeful outlook for the future. Their only comfort in such deprivation is akin to the devoted guards of a camp—believing that their suffering ensures peace and safety within. Are there any fellow citizens who would impose greater sacrifices or humiliations on them than what is absolutely necessary for the security of the purpose for which they were separated from their fellow citizens? Shouldn’t their rights be guaranteed by the application of those fundamental principles upon which our constitutions are based? The greatest British orators and statesmen remind us that at the start of the Revolutionary War, even the dullest minds in England referred to them as "their American subjects." Are there, in fact, citizens from any of our states who think of the people in the District of Columbia as subjects? Such notions can never be born from my actions. The people of the District of Columbia are not subjects of the states, but free American citizens. Being free when the Constitution was created, no language in that document could have aimed to strip them of that status. If the great principle of unalienable rights, emphasized in our Declaration of Independence, holds true, they could neither make nor could the United States accept a surrender of their freedoms and become subjects—in other words, slaves—to their former fellow citizens. If this is true—and it should be uncontroversial to anyone who understands their rights as an American citizen—the grant of exclusive jurisdiction to Congress in the District of Columbia could only mean allowing Congress the necessary control to ensure a free and safe execution of the functions assigned to the federal government by the Constitution. In all other respects, Congressional legislation should be tailored to their unique needs and align with their considered views of their own interests.

I have spoken of the necessity of keeping the respective departments of the Government, as well as all the other authorities of our country, within their appropriate orbits. This is a matter of difficulty in some cases, as the powers which they respectively claim are often not defined by any distinct lines. Mischievous, however, in their tendencies as collisions of this kind may be, those which arise between the respective communities which for certain purposes compose one nation are much more so, for no such nation can long exist without the careful culture of those feelings of confidence and affection which are the effective bonds to union between free and confederated states. Strong as is the tie of interest, it has been often found ineffectual. Men blinded by their passions have been known to adopt measures for their country in direct opposition to all the suggestions of policy. The alternative, then, is to destroy or keep down a bad passion by creating and fostering a good one, and this seems to be the corner stone upon which our American political architects have reared the fabric of our Government. The cement which was to bind it and perpetuate its existence was the affectionate attachment between all its members. To insure the continuance of this feeling, produced at first by a community of dangers, of sufferings, and of interests, the advantages of each were made accessible to all. No participation in any good possessed by any member of our extensive Confederacy, except in domestic government, was withheld from the citizen of any other member. By a process attended with no difficulty, no delay, no expense but that of removal, the citizen of one might become the citizen of any other, and successively of the whole. The lines, too, separating powers to be exercised by the citizens of one State from those of another seem to be so distinctly drawn as to leave no room for misunderstanding. The citizens of each State unite in their persons all the privileges which that character confers and all that they may claim as citizens of the United States, but in no case can the same persons at the same time act as the citizen of two separate States, and he is therefore positively precluded from any interference with the reserved powers of any State but that of which he is for the time being a citizen. He may, indeed, offer to the citizens of other States his advice as to their management, and the form in which it is tendered is left to his own discretion and sense of propriety. It may be observed, however, that organized associations of citizens requiring compliance with their wishes too much resemble the recommendations of Athens to her allies, supported by an armed and powerful fleet. It was, indeed, to the ambition of the leading States of Greece to control the domestic concerns of the others that the destruction of that celebrated Confederacy, and subsequently of all its members, is mainly to be attributed, and it is owing to the absence of that spirit that the Helvetic Confederacy has for so many years been preserved. Never has there been seen in the institutions of the separate members of any confederacy more elements of discord. In the principles and forms of government and religion, as well as in the circumstances of the several Cantons, so marked a discrepancy was observable as to promise anything but harmony in their intercourse or permanency in their alliance, and yet for ages neither has been interrupted. Content with the positive benefits which their union produced, with the independence and safety from foreign aggression which it secured, these sagacious people respected the institutions of each other, however repugnant to their own principles and prejudices.

I've talked about the need to keep different branches of the Government, along with all the other authorities in our country, in their proper roles. This can be challenging sometimes, as the powers they each claim are often not clearly defined. However, while conflicts of this type can be harmful, those that arise between different communities that form one nation for certain purposes are even more so, as no nation can survive long without nurturing the feelings of trust and affection that effectively bind free and united states together. Although the bond of interest is strong, it has often proven to be ineffective. People blinded by their passions have made decisions for their country that directly oppose wise policy suggestions. The solution, then, is to suppress a bad passion by encouraging a good one, which seems to be the foundation upon which our American political builders have constructed the framework of our Government. The glue meant to hold it together and ensure its lasting existence was the loving bond among all its members. To maintain this feeling, initially created by shared threats, hardships, and interests, the benefits of each state were made available to all. No citizen of any member of our vast Confederacy was denied access to any good held by another member, except in domestic governance. It was easy, quick, and cost-free, aside from the act of moving, for a citizen of one state to become a citizen of any other and, by extension, of the whole. The boundaries separating the powers exercised by citizens of one state from those of another are clearly drawn, leaving no room for confusion. Citizens of each state combine in themselves all the rights conferred by that status and all that they can claim as citizens of the United States; however, no individual can simultaneously act as a citizen of two separate states, and they are therefore strictly prohibited from interfering with the reserved powers of any state other than the one they currently belong to. They can, indeed, offer their advice to citizens of other states about their management, and the way they offer it is left to their own discretion and sense of appropriateness. However, it is worth noting that organized groups of citizens demanding compliance with their wishes resemble Athens' recommendations to its allies, backed by a strong and powerful fleet. The destruction of that famous Confederacy, and ultimately all of its members, is mainly due to the ambitions of the leading Greek states to control the domestic affairs of others. Conversely, the Helvetic Confederacy has endured for many years due to the absence of that ambition. There has never been a confederacy where the individual members' institutions showed so many elements of discord. The differences in governing principles and structures, religious beliefs, and the circumstances of the various Cantons were so pronounced that they seemed unlikely to foster harmony or permanence in their alliance, yet for centuries, neither has been disrupted. Satisfied with the tangible benefits their union produced, along with the independence and protection from foreign threats it provided, these wise people respected each other’s institutions, no matter how contrary to their own beliefs and prejudices.

Our Confederacy, fellow-citizens, can only be preserved by the same forbearance. Our citizens must be content with the exercise of the powers with which the Constitution clothes them. The attempt of those of one State to control the domestic institutions of another can only result in feelings of distrust and jealousy, the certain harbingers of disunion, violence, and civil war, and the ultimate destruction of our free institutions. Our Confederacy is perfectly illustrated by the terms and principles governing a common copartnership. There is a fund of power to be exercised under the direction of the joint councils of the allied members, but that which has been reserved by the individual members is intangible by the common Government or the individual members composing it. To attempt it finds no support in the principles of our Constitution.

Our Confederacy, fellow citizens, can only be maintained through forbearance. Our citizens must be satisfied with using the powers granted to them by the Constitution. Trying to control the domestic affairs of another state will only lead to distrust and jealousy, which are sure signs of disunion, violence, civil war, and ultimately the destruction of our free institutions. Our Confederacy is best understood through the terms and principles of a common partnership. There is a pool of power to be managed under the guidance of the joint councils of the allied members, but what has been reserved by the individual members is beyond the reach of the common Government or the individual members within it. Attempting to do so has no support in the principles of our Constitution.

It should be our constant and earnest endeavor mutually to cultivate a spirit of concord and harmony among the various parts of our Confederacy. Experience has abundantly taught us that the agitation by citizens of one part of the Union of a subject not confided to the General Government, but exclusively under the guardianship of the local authorities, is productive of no other consequences than bitterness, alienation, discord, and injury to the very cause which is intended to be advanced. Of all the great interests which appertain to our country, that of union—cordial, confiding, fraternal union—is by far the most important, since it is the only true and sure guaranty of all others.

We should always work together to foster a spirit of agreement and harmony among the different parts of our Confederacy. Our experiences have clearly shown that when people from one part of the Union push for issues that are under the control of local authorities rather than the General Government, it only leads to negativity, division, conflict, and harm to the very cause they want to support. Out of all the significant interests that affect our country, the interest in unity—genuine, trusting, and brotherly unity—is by far the most crucial, as it is the only true and reliable guarantee of all the others.

In consequence of the embarrassed state of business and the currency, some of the States may meet with difficulty in their financial concerns. However deeply we may regret anything imprudent or excessive in the engagements into which States have entered for purposes of their own, it does not become us to disparage the States governments, nor to discourage them from making proper efforts for their own relief. On the contrary, it is our duty to encourage them to the extent of our constitutional authority to apply their best means and cheerfully to make all necessary sacrifices and submit to all necessary burdens to fulfill their engagements and maintain their credit, for the character and credit of the several States form a part of the character and credit of the whole country. The resources of the country are abundant, the enterprise and activity of our people proverbial, and we may well hope that wise legislation and prudent administration by the respective governments, each acting within its own sphere, will restore former prosperity.

Due to the troubled state of business and the currency, some states might struggle with their financial issues. While we may regret any unwise or excessive commitments made by the states for their own purposes, we should not belittle the state governments or discourage them from making proper efforts for their own recovery. On the contrary, it's our responsibility to encourage them, as far as our constitutional authority allows, to use their best resources, willingly make necessary sacrifices, and accept necessary burdens to meet their obligations and maintain their credit. The reputation and credit of each state contribute to the overall reputation and credit of the country. The country's resources are plentiful, and the initiative and energy of our people are well-known, so we can hope that smart legislation and careful management by the respective governments, each acting within its own area of responsibility, will bring back previous prosperity.

Unpleasant and even dangerous as collisions may sometimes be between the constituted authorities of the citizens of our country in relation to the lines which separate their respective jurisdictions, the results can be of no vital injury to our institutions if that ardent patriotism, that devoted attachment to liberty, that spirit of moderation and forbearance for which our countrymen were once distinguished, continue to be cherished. If this continues to be the ruling passion of our souls, the weaker feeling of the mistaken enthusiast will be corrected, the Utopian dreams of the scheming politician dissipated, and the complicated intrigues of the demagogue rendered harmless. The spirit of liberty is the sovereign balm for every injury which our institutions may receive. On the contrary, no care that can be used in the construction of our Government, no division of powers, no distribution of checks in its several departments, will prove effectual to keep us a free people if this spirit is suffered to decay; and decay it will without constant nurture. To the neglect of this duty the best historians agree in attributing the ruin of all the republics with whose existence and fall their writings have made us acquainted. The same causes will ever produce the same effects, and as long as the love of power is a dominant passion of the human bosom, and as long as the understandings of men can be warped and their affections changed by operations upon their passions and prejudices, so long will the liberties of a people depend on their own constant attention to its preservation. The danger to all well-established free governments arises from the unwillingness of the people to believe in its existence or from the influence of designing men diverting their attention from the quarter whence it approaches to a source from which it can never come. This is the old trick of those who would usurp the government of their country. In the name of democracy they speak, warning the people against the influence of wealth and the danger of aristocracy. History, ancient and modern, is full of such examples. Caesar became the master of the Roman people and the senate under the pretense of supporting the democratic claims of the former against the aristocracy of the latter; Cromwell, in the character of protector of the liberties of the people, became the dictator of England, and Bolivar possessed himself of unlimited power with the title of his country's liberator. There is, on the contrary, no instance on record of an extensive and well-established republic being changed into an aristocracy. The tendencies of all such governments in their decline is to monarchy, and the antagonist principle to liberty there is the spirit of faction—a spirit which assumes the character and in times of great excitement imposes itself upon the people as the genuine spirit of freedom, and, like the false Christs whose coming was foretold by the Savior, seeks to, and were it possible would, impose upon the true and most faithful disciples of liberty. It is in periods like this that it behooves the people to be most watchful of those to whom they have intrusted power. And although there is at times much difficulty in distinguishing the false from the true spirit, a calm and dispassionate investigation will detect the counterfeit, as well by the character of its operations as the results that are produced. The true spirit of liberty, although devoted, persevering, bold, and uncompromising in principle, that secured is mild and tolerant and scrupulous as to the means it employs, whilst the spirit of party, assuming to be that of liberty, is harsh, vindictive, and intolerant, and totally reckless as to the character of the allies which it brings to the aid of its cause. When the genuine spirit of liberty animates the body of a people to a thorough examination of their affairs, it leads to the excision of every excrescence which may have fastened itself upon any of the departments of the government, and restores the system to its pristine health and beauty. But the reign of an intolerant spirit of party amongst a free people seldom fails to result in a dangerous accession to the executive power introduced and established amidst unusual professions of devotion to democracy.

Unpleasant and even dangerous as conflicts can sometimes be between the established authorities representing our country's citizens regarding the boundaries that separate their jurisdictions, the outcomes can cause no significant harm to our institutions if that passionate patriotism, that committed love for freedom, that spirit of moderation and tolerance for which our countrymen were once known, continues to be valued. If this remains the driving force of our hearts, the misguided enthusiasm of the misguided will be corrected, the idealistic visions of ambitious politicians will fade away, and the complex schemes of demagogues will lose their power. The spirit of freedom is the ultimate remedy for any harm our institutions may face. On the other hand, no amount of care in constructing our Government, no division of powers, no system of checks within its various branches, will be effective in keeping us a free people if this spirit is allowed to fade; and it will fade without constant effort. The best historians agree that the neglect of this duty is what led to the downfall of all the republics they have documented. The same causes will always produce the same effects; as long as the desire for power is a strong passion within human nature and as long as people's reasoning can be swayed and their feelings can be altered through manipulation of their passions and biases, the freedoms of a people rely on their continuous attention to preserving them. The danger to all stable free governments comes from the people's reluctance to believe in its existence or from the influence of scheming individuals redirecting their focus from the actual source of threats to an imaginary one. This is an old tactic used by those who seek to take over their country's government. Under the guise of democracy, they warn the public against the influence of wealth and the threat of aristocracy. History, both ancient and modern, is filled with such examples. Caesar became the ruler of the Roman people and the Senate while pretending to defend the democratic claims of the former against the aristocracy of the latter; Cromwell, posing as the protector of people's freedoms, became England's dictator, and Bolivar gained unlimited power under the title of liberator of his country. Conversely, there is no record of a large and well-established republic turning into an aristocracy. The tendency of all such governments in decline is towards monarchy, with the opposing force to liberty being the spirit of faction—a spirit that masquerades as the genuine spirit of freedom during times of great upheaval and, like the false prophets foretold by the Savior, seeks to deceive and, if possible, impose on the true and most loyal followers of liberty. It is during such periods that the people must be most vigilant regarding those to whom they have entrusted power. And while it can sometimes be difficult to distinguish between the false and the true spirit, a calm and rational examination will reveal the impostor, both through the nature of its actions and the outcomes it produces. The true spirit of liberty, though dedicated, persistent, bold, and uncompromising in principle, is gentle and tolerant and careful about the means it employs, while the spirit of party, claiming to represent liberty, is harsh, vengeful, and intolerant, and completely reckless regarding the nature of the allies it brings to support its cause. When the authentic spirit of liberty inspires a people to thoroughly scrutinize their affairs, it leads to the removal of any growth that may have attached itself to any government departments, restoring the system to its original health and beauty. However, the dominance of an intolerant party spirit among a free people rarely fails to lead to a dangerous increase in executive power that is introduced and established amid exaggerated claims of devotion to democracy.

The foregoing remarks relate almost exclusively to matters connected with our domestic concerns. It may be proper, however, that I should give some indications to my fellow-citizens of my proposed course of conduct in the management of our foreign relations. I assure them, therefore, that it is my intention to use every means in my power to preserve the friendly intercourse which now so happily subsists with every foreign nation, and that although, of course, not well informed as to the state of pending negotiations with any of them, I see in the personal characters of the sovereigns, as well as in the mutual interests of our own and of the governments with which our relations are most intimate, a pleasing guaranty that the harmony so important to the interests of their subjects as well as of our citizens will not be interrupted by the advancement of any claim or pretension upon their part to which our honor would not permit us to yield. Long the defender of my country's rights in the field, I trust that my fellow-citizens will not see in my earnest desire to preserve peace with foreign powers any indication that their rights will ever be sacrificed or the honor of the nation tarnished by any admission on the part of their Chief Magistrate unworthy of their former glory. In our intercourse with our aboriginal neighbors the same liberality and justice which marked the course prescribed to me by two of my illustrious predecessors when acting under their direction in the discharge of the duties of superintendent and commissioner shall be strictly observed. I can conceive of no more sublime spectacle, none more likely to propitiate an impartial and common Creator, than a rigid adherence to the principles of justice on the part of a powerful nation in its transactions with a weaker and uncivilized people whom circumstances have placed at its disposal.

The previous comments mainly focus on our domestic issues. However, I think it's important to share my planned approach regarding our foreign relations with my fellow citizens. I want to assure them that I intend to do everything I can to maintain the friendly relationships we currently enjoy with every foreign nation. Although I'm not fully briefed on the ongoing negotiations with any of them, I believe that the personal qualities of the leaders, along with the shared interests between our country and those with whom we have close ties, provide a reassuring guarantee that the harmony essential for the well-being of their citizens and our own will not be disrupted by any claims or demands that compromise our honor. As someone who has long defended my country's rights, I hope my genuine desire to maintain peace with foreign nations is not seen as a sign that their rights will be sacrificed or that the nation's honor will be compromised by any actions from their Chief Magistrate that would dishonor our past glory. In our dealings with our Indigenous neighbors, I will uphold the same fairness and justice that were outlined for me by two of my distinguished predecessors while fulfilling my responsibilities as their superintendent and commissioner. I can imagine no greater sight, and none more likely to please an impartial and universal Creator, than a strong nation strictly adhering to justice when dealing with a weaker and less civilized people who find themselves at its mercy.

Before concluding, fellow-citizens, I must say something to you on the subject of the parties at this time existing in our country. To me it appears perfectly clear that the interest of that country requires that the violence of the spirit by which those parties are at this time governed must be greatly mitigated, if not entirely extinguished, or consequences will ensue which are appalling to be thought of.

Before wrapping up, fellow citizens, I need to address the political parties currently in our country. It seems obvious to me that the well-being of our nation depends on significantly reducing, if not completely eliminating, the hostility that drives these parties, or we will face consequences that are frightening to imagine.

If parties in a republic are necessary to secure a degree of vigilance sufficient to keep the public functionaries within the bounds of law and duty, at that point their usefulness ends. Beyond that they become destructive of public virtue, the parent of a spirit antagonist to that of liberty, and eventually its inevitable conqueror. We have examples of republics where the love of country and of liberty at one time were the dominant passions of the whole mass of citizens, and yet, with the continuance of the name and forms of free government, not a vestige of these qualities remaining in the bosoms of any one of its citizens. It was the beautiful remark of a distinguished English writer that "in the Roman senate Octavius had a party and Anthony a party, but the Commonwealth had none." Yet the senate continued to meet in the temple of liberty to talk of the sacredness and beauty of the Commonwealth and gaze at the statues of the elder Brutus and of the Curtii and Decii, and the people assembled in the forum, not, as in the days of Camillus and the Scipios, to cast their free votes for annual magistrates or pass upon the acts of the senate, but to receive from the hands of the leaders of the respective parties their share of the spoils and to shout for one or the other, as those collected in Gaul or Egypt and the lesser Asia would furnish the larger dividend. The spirit of liberty had fled, and, avoiding the abodes of civilized man, had sought protection in the wilds of Scythia or Scandinavia; and so under the operation of the same causes and influences it will fly from our Capitol and our forums. A calamity so awful, not only to our country, but to the world, must be deprecated by every patriot and every tendency to a state of things likely to produce it immediately checked. Such a tendency has existed—does exist. Always the friend of my countrymen, never their flatterer, it becomes my duty to say to them from this high place to which their partiality has exalted me that there exists in the land a spirit hostile to their best interests—hostile to liberty itself. It is a spirit contracted in its views, selfish in its objects. It looks to the aggrandizement of a few even to the destruction of the interests of the whole. The entire remedy is with the people. Something, however, may be effected by the means which they have placed in my hands. It is union that we want, not of a party for the sake of that party, but a union of the whole country for the sake of the whole country, for the defense of its interests and its honor against foreign aggression, for the defense of those principles for which our ancestors so gloriously contended. As far as it depends upon me it shall be accomplished. All the influence that I possess shall be exerted to prevent the formation at least of an Executive party in the halls of the legislative body. I wish for the support of no member of that body to any measure of mine that does not satisfy his judgment and his sense of duty to those from whom he holds his appointment, nor any confidence in advance from the people but that asked for by Mr. Jefferson, "to give firmness and effect to the legal administration of their affairs."

If political parties in a republic are needed to ensure a level of vigilance that keeps public officials within the limits of law and duty, then their usefulness ends there. After that point, they become harmful to public virtue, fostering a spirit that opposes liberty, ultimately conquering it. We can see examples of republics where love for the country and liberty were once the main passions of all its citizens, yet, despite maintaining the name and structure of free government, not a trace of these qualities remained in the hearts of any citizen. A notable English writer observed, "in the Roman senate, Octavius had one party and Anthony had another, but the Commonwealth had none." Yet the senate continued to gather in the temple of liberty to discuss the sacredness and beauty of the Commonwealth while admiring the statues of the elder Brutus and the Curtii and Decii. The people gathered in the forum, not as they did in the days of Camillus and the Scipios, to freely vote for annual magistrates or decide on the acts of the senate, but to receive their share of the spoils from the leaders of the various parties and cheer for one or the other, depending on who could deliver a bigger payout from Gaul or Egypt and the lesser Asia. The spirit of liberty had vanished, avoiding the homes of civilization and seeking refuge in the wilds of Scythia or Scandinavia; and under the same causes and influences, it will flee from our Capitol and our forums. Such a devastating outcome, not just for our country but for the world, should be a concern for every patriot, and any movement towards a situation likely to bring it about must be immediately halted. This tendency has existed—it exists now. Always a friend to my fellow citizens, never their flatterer, I feel it is my duty to tell them from this esteemed position that there exists a spirit in the land that is hostile to their best interests—hostile to liberty itself. It is a narrow-minded spirit, selfish in its aims. It seeks the elevation of a few at the expense of the entire community. The complete solution lies with the people. However, I can do something with the powers entrusted to me. What we need is unity, not a party unity for its own sake, but a unity of the whole country for the sake of the country, to defend its interests and honor against foreign aggression, and to uphold the principles for which our ancestors valiantly fought. I will do everything in my power to achieve this. I will use all my influence to prevent the formation of at least an Executive party in the legislative halls. I don’t seek the support of any member of that body for any of my measures unless it aligns with his judgment and duty to those who appointed him, nor do I require any prior trust from the people except for what Mr. Jefferson asked for: "to give firmness and effect to the legal administration of their affairs."

I deem the present occasion sufficiently important and solemn to justify me in expressing to my fellow-citizens a profound reverence for the Christian religion and a thorough conviction that sound morals, religious liberty, and a just sense of religious responsibility are essentially connected with all true and lasting happiness; and to that good Being who has blessed us by the gifts of civil and religious freedom, who watched over and prospered the labors of our fathers and has hitherto preserved to us institutions far exceeding in excellence those of any other people, let us unite in fervently commending every interest of our beloved country in all future time.

I believe this occasion is significant and serious enough to warrant expressing my deep respect for the Christian faith and my strong belief that good morals, religious freedom, and a genuine sense of religious responsibility are all essential to true and lasting happiness. Let us come together to sincerely commend every aspect of our beloved country to that good Being who has blessed us with the gifts of civil and religious freedom, who has watched over and supported the efforts of our ancestors, and who has helped us maintain institutions that far surpass those of any other nation, now and in the future.

Fellow-citizens, being fully invested with that high office to which the partiality of my countrymen has called me, I now take an affectionate leave of you. You will bear with you to your homes the remembrance of the pledge I have this day given to discharge all the high duties of my exalted station according to the best of my ability, and I shall enter upon their performance with entire confidence in the support of a just and generous people.

Fellow citizens, as I step into the important role that your support has given me, I now say a heartfelt goodbye to all of you. You'll take with you the promise I've made today to fulfill all the responsibilities of this significant position to the best of my ability, and I will take on these responsibilities with full confidence in the support of a fair and kind people.






JAMES KNOX POLK, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1845

[Transcriber's note: The inaugural ceremonies of former Tennessee Governor and Speaker of the House James Knox Polk were conducted before a large crowd that stood in the pouring rain. The popular politician had been nominated on the ninth ballot as his party's candidate. His name had not been in nomination until the third polling of the delegates at the national convention. The outgoing President Tyler, who had taken office upon the death of William Henry Harrison, rode to the Capitol with Mr. Polk. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico by Chief Justice Roger Taney. The events of the ceremony were telegraphed to Baltimore by Samuel Morse on his year-old invention.]

[Transcriber's note: The inaugural ceremonies of former Tennessee Governor and Speaker of the House James Knox Polk took place in front of a large crowd that stood in the pouring rain. The popular politician had been nominated on the ninth ballot as his party's candidate. His name hadn't been in nomination until the third round of delegates at the national convention. The outgoing President Tyler, who had taken office after the death of William Henry Harrison, rode to the Capitol with Mr. Polk. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico by Chief Justice Roger Taney. The events of the ceremony were sent via telegraph to Baltimore by Samuel Morse using his year-old invention.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow Citizens:

Without solicitation on my part, I have been chosen by the free and voluntary suffrages of my countrymen to the most honorable and most responsible office on earth. I am deeply impressed with gratitude for the confidence reposed in me. Honored with this distinguished consideration at an earlier period of life than any of my predecessors, I can not disguise the diffidence with which I am about to enter on the discharge of my official duties.

Without me asking for it, my fellow citizens have chosen me for the most honorable and responsible position on earth. I feel truly grateful for the trust placed in me. Being honored with this significant role at a younger age than any of my predecessors, I can't hide the uncertainty I feel as I begin to fulfill my official responsibilities.

If the more aged and experienced men who have filled the office of President of the United States even in the infancy of the Republic distrusted their ability to discharge the duties of that exalted station, what ought not to be the apprehensions of one so much younger and less endowed now that our domain extends from ocean to ocean, that our people have so greatly increased in numbers, and at a time when so great diversity of opinion prevails in regard to the principles and policy which should characterize the administration of our Government? Well may the boldest fear and the wisest tremble when incurring responsibilities on which may depend our country's peace and prosperity, and in some degree the hopes and happiness of the whole human family.

If the older, more experienced men who have held the office of President of the United States, even in the early days of the Republic, doubted their ability to fulfill the responsibilities of that high position, what should be the worries of someone much younger and less equipped now that our territory stretches from coast to coast, our population has significantly increased, and we are facing such a wide range of opinions about the principles and policies that should guide our Government? It’s understandable that even the bravest might fear and the wisest could hesitate when taking on responsibilities that could determine our country’s peace and prosperity, along with the hopes and happiness of humanity as a whole.

In assuming responsibilities so vast I fervently invoke the aid of that Almighty Ruler of the Universe in whose hands are the destinies of nations and of men to guard this Heaven-favored land against the mischiefs which without His guidance might arise from an unwise public policy. With a firm reliance upon the wisdom of Omnipotence to sustain and direct me in the path of duty which I am appointed to pursue, I stand in the presence of this assembled multitude of my countrymen to take upon myself the solemn obligation "to the best of my ability to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

In taking on such great responsibilities, I sincerely seek the help of the Almighty Ruler of the Universe, who controls the fates of nations and people, to protect this blessed land from the troubles that could arise from misguided public policy without His guidance. With a strong belief in the wisdom of the Almighty to support and lead me in fulfilling my duties, I stand before this gathered crowd of my fellow citizens to take on the serious commitment "to the best of my ability to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

A concise enumeration of the principles which will guide me in the administrative policy of the Government is not only in accordance with the examples set me by all my predecessors, but is eminently befitting the occasion.

A brief list of the principles that will guide me in the government's administrative policy aligns with the examples set by all my predecessors and is very appropriate for this occasion.

The Constitution itself, plainly written as it is, the safeguard of our federative compact, the offspring of concession and compromise, binding together in the bonds of peace and union this great and increasing family of free and independent States, will be the chart by which I shall be directed.

The Constitution, straightforward as it is, protects our federal agreement, born from concession and compromise, uniting this large and growing family of free and independent States in peace and unity. It will be the guide I follow.

It will be my first care to administer the Government in the true spirit of that instrument, and to assume no powers not expressly granted or clearly implied in its terms. The Government of the United States is one of delegated and limited powers, and it is by a strict adherence to the clearly granted powers and by abstaining from the exercise of doubtful or unauthorized implied powers that we have the only sure guaranty against the recurrence of those unfortunate collisions between the Federal and State authorities which have occasionally so much disturbed the harmony of our system and even threatened the perpetuity of our glorious Union.

I will prioritize running the Government according to the true spirit of that document and will take on no powers that aren't explicitly granted or clearly implied in its terms. The Government of the United States has delegated and limited powers, and it is through strict adherence to the powers that are clearly granted and by avoiding the use of uncertain or unauthorized implied powers that we have the best assurance against the unfortunate clashes between Federal and State authorities that have, at times, seriously disrupted the harmony of our system and even threatened the longevity of our great Union.

"To the States, respectively, or to the people" have been reserved "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States." Each State is a complete sovereignty within the sphere of its reserved powers. The Government of the Union, acting within the sphere of its delegated authority, is also a complete sovereignty. While the General Government should abstain from the exercise of authority not clearly delegated to it, the States should be equally careful that in the maintenance of their rights they do not overstep the limits of powers reserved to them. One of the most distinguished of my predecessors attached deserved importance to "the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administration for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwark against antirepublican tendencies," and to the "preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad."

"To the States, or to the people" are reserved "the powers not given to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited to the States by it." Each State has complete sovereignty within the scope of its reserved powers. The Government of the Union, operating within its delegated authority, also holds complete sovereignty. While the Federal Government should refrain from exercising authority not clearly given to it, the States should also be careful not to go beyond the limits of the powers reserved for them as they maintain their rights. One of my notable predecessors emphasized the importance of "supporting the State governments in all their rights, as the most capable administration of our domestic issues and the strongest defense against anti-republican trends," and the "preservation of the General Government in its full constitutional strength, as the anchor for our peace at home and safety abroad."

To the Government of the United States has been intrusted the exclusive management of our foreign affairs. Beyond that it wields a few general enumerated powers. It does not force reform on the States. It leaves individuals, over whom it casts its protecting influence, entirely free to improve their own condition by the legitimate exercise of all their mental and physical powers. It is a common protector of each and all the States; of every man who lives upon our soil, whether of native or foreign birth; of every religious sect, in their worship of the Almighty according to the dictates of their own conscience; of every shade of opinion, and the most free inquiry; of every art, trade, and occupation consistent with the laws of the States. And we rejoice in the general happiness, prosperity, and advancement of our country, which have been the offspring of freedom, and not of power.

The Government of the United States is exclusively responsible for managing our foreign affairs. Besides that, it has a few general powers listed in the Constitution. It doesn’t impose changes on the States. It allows individuals, whom it protects, to be fully free to improve their own situations through the rightful use of their mental and physical abilities. It serves as a common protector for all the States; for every person living on our soil, whether they were born here or elsewhere; for every religious group, allowing them to worship the Almighty as they see fit; for every opinion and free inquiry; and for every art, trade, and profession that complies with State laws. We take pride in the overall happiness, prosperity, and progress of our country, which have arisen from freedom, not from power.

This most admirable and wisest system of well-regulated self-government among men ever devised by human minds has been tested by its successful operation for more than half a century, and if preserved from the usurpations of the Federal Government on the one hand and the exercise by the States of powers not reserved to them on the other, will, I fervently hope and believe, endure for ages to come and dispense the blessings of civil and religious liberty to distant generations. To effect objects so dear to every patriot I shall devote myself with anxious solicitude. It will be my desire to guard against that most fruitful source of danger to the harmonious action of our system which consists in substituting the mere discretion and caprice of the Executive or of majorities in the legislative department of the Government for powers which have been withheld from the Federal Government by the Constitution. By the theory of our Government majorities rule, but this right is not an arbitrary or unlimited one. It is a right to be exercised in subordination to the Constitution and in conformity to it. One great object of the Constitution was to restrain majorities from oppressing minorities or encroaching upon their just rights. Minorities have a right to appeal to the Constitution as a shield against such oppression.

This highly admirable and wise system of well-regulated self-government created by humans has been successfully operating for more than fifty years. If it is protected from the overreach of the Federal Government on one side and from the States exercising powers not granted to them on the other, I sincerely hope and believe it will last for generations to come, providing the blessings of civil and religious liberty to future generations. To achieve goals that are so important to every patriot, I will dedicate myself with great care. I aim to guard against the most significant source of danger to the smooth functioning of our system, which is the replacement of the clear limits set by the Constitution with the whims and unpredictability of the Executive or the majority in the legislative branch. According to our Government's principles, the majority rules, but this right is not arbitrary or limitless. It is a right that must be exercised within the boundaries set by the Constitution. One of the main goals of the Constitution was to prevent the majority from oppressing minorities or infringing on their rightful privileges. Minorities have the right to turn to the Constitution as protection against such oppression.

That the blessings of liberty which our Constitution secures may be enjoyed alike by minorities and majorities, the Executive has been wisely invested with a qualified veto upon the acts of the Legislature. It is a negative power, and is conservative in its character. It arrests for the time hasty, inconsiderate, or unconstitutional legislation, invites reconsideration, and transfers questions at issue between the legislative and executive departments to the tribunal of the people. Like all other powers, it is subject to be abused. When judiciously and properly exercised, the Constitution itself may be saved from infraction and the rights of all preserved and protected.

To ensure that everyone, both minorities and majorities, can enjoy the freedoms our Constitution guarantees, the Executive has been given a qualified veto over the Legislature's actions. This veto is a negative power and acts as a safeguard. It temporarily halts hasty, careless, or unconstitutional legislation, encourages a second look, and brings disputes between the legislative and executive branches to the attention of the public. Like any power, it can be misused. However, when used wisely and correctly, it can help uphold the Constitution and protect the rights of everyone.

The inestimable value of our Federal Union is felt and acknowledged by all. By this system of united and confederated States our people are permitted collectively and individually to seek their own happiness in their own way, and the consequences have been most auspicious. Since the Union was formed the number of the States has increased from thirteen to twenty-eight; two of these have taken their position as members of the Confederacy within the last week. Our population has increased from three to twenty millions. New communities and States are seeking protection under its aegis, and multitudes from the Old World are flocking to our shores to participate in its blessings. Beneath its benign sway peace and prosperity prevail. Freed from the burdens and miseries of war, our trade and intercourse have extended throughout the world. Mind, no longer tasked in devising means to accomplish or resist schemes of ambition, usurpation, or conquest, is devoting itself to man's true interests in developing his faculties and powers and the capacity of nature to minister to his enjoyments. Genius is free to announce its inventions and discoveries, and the hand is free to accomplish whatever the head conceives not incompatible with the rights of a fellow-being. All distinctions of birth or of rank have been abolished. All citizens, whether native or adopted, are placed upon terms of precise equality. All are entitled to equal rights and equal protection. No union exists between church and state, and perfect freedom of opinion is guaranteed to all sects and creeds.

The invaluable worth of our Federal Union is recognized and appreciated by everyone. Through this system of united and confederated States, we are allowed both collectively and individually to pursue our own happiness in our own ways, and the results have been incredibly positive. Since the Union was established, the number of States has grown from thirteen to twenty-eight; two of them have joined the Confederacy just last week. Our population has risen from three to twenty million. New communities and States are seeking shelter under its protection, and countless people from the Old World are arriving on our shores to share in its benefits. Under its nurturing influence, peace and prosperity thrive. Freed from the burdens and suffering of war, our trade and interactions have expanded globally. Instead of focusing on strategies to achieve or thwart ambitious plans, usurpation, or conquest, minds are now dedicated to genuine human interests in improving skills, abilities, and the natural world that supports our enjoyment. Creativity is free to promote its inventions and discoveries, and individuals can pursue whatever ideas they have, as long as they don't infringe on another person's rights. All distinctions of birth or rank have been eliminated. All citizens, whether born here or newcomers, are treated with absolute equality. Everyone is entitled to the same rights and protection. There is no relationship between church and state, and complete freedom of thought is guaranteed for all religions and beliefs.

These are some of the blessings secured to our happy land by our Federal Union. To perpetuate them it is our sacred duty to preserve it. Who shall assign limits to the achievements of free minds and free hands under the protection of this glorious Union? No treason to mankind since the organization of society would be equal in atrocity to that of him who would lift his hand to destroy it. He would overthrow the noblest structure of human wisdom, which protects himself and his fellow-man. He would stop the progress of free government and involve his country either in anarchy or despotism. He would extinguish the fire of liberty, which warms and animates the hearts of happy millions and invites all the nations of the earth to imitate our example. If he say that error and wrong are committed in the administration of the Government, let him remember that nothing human can be perfect, and that under no other system of government revealed by Heaven or devised by man has reason been allowed so free and broad a scope to combat error. Has the sword of despots proved to be a safer or surer instrument of reform in government than enlightened reason? Does he expect to find among the ruins of this Union a happier abode for our swarming millions than they now have under it? Every lover of his country must shudder at the thought of the possibility of its dissolution, and will be ready to adopt the patriotic sentiment, "Our Federal Union—it must be preserved." To preserve it the compromises which alone enabled our fathers to form a common constitution for the government and protection of so many States and distinct communities, of such diversified habits, interests, and domestic institutions, must be sacredly and religiously observed. Any attempt to disturb or destroy these compromises, being terms of the compact of union, can lead to none other than the most ruinous and disastrous consequences.

These are some of the blessings secured for our wonderful country by our Federal Union. To maintain them, it is our duty to protect it. Who can limit what free minds and free hands can achieve under the protection of this glorious Union? No act of betrayal against humanity since the establishment of society would be as terrible as that of someone who would try to destroy it. Such a person would dismantle the greatest achievement of human wisdom, which safeguards him and his fellow citizens. He would halt the progress of free government and plunge his country into either chaos or dictatorship. He would snuff out the flame of liberty that inspires and energizes the hearts of millions and encourages all nations of the world to follow our lead. If he claims that mistakes and injustices occur in the management of the government, let him remember that nothing human is perfect, and that under no other system of government—whether revealed by Heaven or designed by man—has reason been given such broad freedom to challenge error. Has the sword of tyrants proven to be a safer or more effective tool for reform in government than enlightened reason? Does he expect to find a happier place for our many citizens among the ruins of this Union than what they currently enjoy within it? Every patriotic citizen should shudder at the thought of its possible collapse and will embrace the sentiment, "Our Federal Union—it must be preserved." To preserve it, the compromises that allowed our forefathers to create a shared constitution for governing and protecting so many states and communities with diverse habits, interests, and institutions must be honored and upheld. Any attempt to disturb or destroy these compromises, which are terms of the union pact, can only lead to the most destructive and disastrous outcomes.

It is a source of deep regret that in some sections of our country misguided persons have occasionally indulged in schemes and agitations whose object is the destruction of domestic institutions existing in other sections—institutions which existed at the adoption of the Constitution and were recognized and protected by it. All must see that if it were possible for them to be successful in attaining their object the dissolution of the Union and the consequent destruction of our happy form of government must speedily follow.

It’s deeply regrettable that in some parts of our country, misled individuals have occasionally engaged in plans and protests aimed at dismantling the domestic institutions found in other regions—institutions that existed when the Constitution was adopted and were acknowledged and safeguarded by it. Everyone must recognize that if they were to succeed in achieving their goal, it would quickly lead to the breakup of the Union and the consequent destruction of our favorable system of government.

I am happy to believe that at every period of our existence as a nation there has existed, and continues to exist, among the great mass of our people a devotion to the Union of the States which will shield and protect it against the moral treason of any who would seriously contemplate its destruction. To secure a continuance of that devotion the compromises of the Constitution must not only be preserved, but sectional jealousies and heartburnings must be discountenanced, and all should remember that they are members of the same political family, having a common destiny. To increase the attachment of our people to the Union, our laws should be just. Any policy which shall tend to favor monopolies or the peculiar interests of sections or classes must operate to the prejudice of the interest of their fellow-citizens, and should be avoided. If the compromises of the Constitution be preserved, if sectional jealousies and heartburnings be discountenanced, if our laws be just and the Government be practically administered strictly within the limits of power prescribed to it, we may discard all apprehensions for the safety of the Union.

I’m glad to believe that throughout our history as a nation, there has been, and still is, a strong commitment among the vast majority of our people to the Union of the States, which will defend it against the moral betrayal of anyone who would consider destroying it. To maintain that commitment, we need to not only preserve the compromises of the Constitution but also set aside regional rivalries and resentments. Everyone should remember that we're all part of the same political family with a shared future. To strengthen the bond our people have with the Union, our laws must be fair. Any policy that favors monopolies or specific interests of regions or classes will harm the interests of fellow citizens and should be avoided. If we preserve the compromises of the Constitution, reject regional rivalries and resentments, ensure our laws are fair, and manage the Government strictly within its prescribed powers, we can set aside any fears for the safety of the Union.

With these views of the nature, character, and objects of the Government and the value of the Union, I shall steadily oppose the creation of those institutions and systems which in their nature tend to pervert it from its legitimate purposes and make it the instrument of sections, classes, and individuals. We need no national banks or other extraneous institutions planted around the Government to control or strengthen it in opposition to the will of its authors. Experience has taught us how unnecessary they are as auxiliaries of the public authorities—how impotent for good and how powerful for mischief.

With these views about the nature, character, and goals of the Government and the value of the Union, I will firmly oppose the creation of institutions and systems that, by their nature, distort it from its legitimate purposes and turn it into a tool for specific groups, classes, and individuals. We don’t need national banks or any outside institutions set up around the Government to influence or bolster it against the will of those who created it. Experience has shown us how unnecessary they are as support for public authorities—how ineffective for good and how powerful for harm.

Ours was intended to be a plain and frugal government, and I shall regard it to be my duty to recommend to Congress and, as far as the Executive is concerned, to enforce by all the means within my power the strictest economy in the expenditure of the public money which may be compatible with the public interests.

Ours was meant to be a simple and budget-conscious government, and I see it as my responsibility to suggest to Congress and, as far as the Executive is concerned, to implement the strictest economy in spending public funds that aligns with the public good.

A national debt has become almost an institution of European monarchies. It is viewed in some of them as an essential prop to existing governments. Melancholy is the condition of that people whose government can be sustained only by a system which periodically transfers large amounts from the labor of the many to the coffers of the few. Such a system is incompatible with the ends for which our republican Government was instituted. Under a wise policy the debts contracted in our Revolution and during the War of 1812 have been happily extinguished. By a judicious application of the revenues not required for other necessary purposes, it is not doubted that the debt which has grown out of the circumstances of the last few years may be speedily paid off.

A national debt has become almost a norm for European monarchies. In some of them, it's seen as a necessary support for their governments. It's a sad situation for a nation whose government can only survive through a system that regularly shifts wealth from the many to a few. Such a system is at odds with the principles for which our republic was founded. Thanks to smart policies, the debts from our Revolution and the War of 1812 have been successfully cleared. With a careful use of the revenues not needed for other important purposes, there's no doubt that the debt from the recent years can be quickly paid off.

I congratulate my fellow-citizens on the entire restoration of the credit of the General Government of the Union and that of many of the States. Happy would it be for the indebted States if they were freed from their liabilities, many of which were incautiously contracted. Although the Government of the Union is neither in a legal nor a moral sense bound for the debts of the States, and it would be a violation of our compact of union to assume them, yet we can not but feel a deep interest in seeing all the States meet their public liabilities and pay off their just debts at the earliest practicable period. That they will do so as soon as it can be done without imposing too heavy burdens on their citizens there is no reason to doubt. The sound moral and honorable feeling of the people of the indebted States can not be questioned, and we are happy to perceive a settled disposition on their part, as their ability returns after a season of unexampled pecuniary embarrassment, to pay off all just demands and to acquiesce in any reasonable measures to accomplish that object.

I want to congratulate my fellow citizens on the full restoration of the credit of the federal government and many states. It would be a relief for the indebted states if they could clear their debts, many of which were carelessly taken on. Although the federal government is not legally or morally responsible for the debts of the states, and taking them on would violate our agreement of union, we deeply care about seeing all states fulfill their public obligations and settle their legitimate debts as soon as possible. There’s no doubt that they will do this as soon as it can be achieved without putting too heavy a burden on their citizens. The strong moral and honorable instincts of the people in these indebted states are unquestionable, and we are pleased to see that they are determined, as their financial situation improves after an unprecedented period of economic hardship, to meet all legitimate demands and agree to any reasonable measures to achieve that goal.

One of the difficulties which we have had to encounter in the practical administration of the Government consists in the adjustment of our revenue laws and the levy of the taxes necessary for the support of Government. In the general proposition that no more money shall be collected than the necessities of an economical administration shall require all parties seem to acquiesce. Nor does there seem to be any material difference of opinion as to the absence of right in the Government to tax one section of country, or one class of citizens, or one occupation, for the mere profit of another. "Justice and sound policy forbid the Federal Government to foster one branch of industry to the detriment of another, or to cherish the interests of one portion to the injury of another portion of our common country." I have heretofore declared to my fellow-citizens that "in my judgment it is the duty of the Government to extend, as far as it may be practicable to do so, by its revenue laws and all other means within its power, fair and just protection to all of the great interests of the whole Union, embracing agriculture, manufactures, the mechanic arts, commerce, and navigation." I have also declared my opinion to be "in favor of a tariff for revenue," and that "in adjusting the details of such a tariff I have sanctioned such moderate discriminating duties as would produce the amount of revenue needed and at the same time afford reasonable incidental protection to our home industry," and that I was "opposed to a tariff for protection merely, and not for revenue."

One of the challenges we've faced in managing the government is adjusting our revenue laws and collecting the taxes needed to support it. Generally, everyone agrees that we shouldn't collect more money than necessary for efficient management. There also seems to be a clear consensus that the government has no right to tax one part of the country, one group of citizens, or one industry just for the benefit of another. "Justice and sound policy prevent the federal government from promoting one industry at the expense of another, or favoring one group over another in our shared country." I've previously told my fellow citizens that "I believe it's the government's duty to provide fair and just protection to all major interests of the whole union, including agriculture, manufacturing, the trades, commerce, and navigation, as much as possible through its revenue laws and other means." I’ve also expressed my belief in "a tariff for revenue" and that "in setting the details of such a tariff, I support reasonable discriminating duties that would generate the necessary revenue while also providing appropriate incidental protection to our domestic industry," and that I am "against a tariff intended only for protection and not for revenue."

The power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises" was an indispensable one to be conferred on the Federal Government, which without it would possess no means of providing for its own support. In executing this power by levying a tariff of duties for the support of Government, the raising of revenue should be the object and protection the incident. To reverse this principle and make protection the object and revenue the incident would be to inflict manifest injustice upon all other than the protected interests. In levying duties for revenue it is doubtless proper to make such discriminations within the revenue principle as will afford incidental protection to our home interests. Within the revenue limit there is a discretion to discriminate; beyond that limit the rightful exercise of the power is not conceded. The incidental protection afforded to our home interests by discriminations within the revenue range it is believed will be ample. In making discriminations all our home interests should as far as practicable be equally protected. The largest portion of our people are agriculturists. Others are employed in manufactures, commerce, navigation, and the mechanic arts. They are all engaged in their respective pursuits and their joint labors constitute the national or home industry. To tax one branch of this home industry for the benefit of another would be unjust. No one of these interests can rightfully claim an advantage over the others, or to be enriched by impoverishing the others. All are equally entitled to the fostering care and protection of the Government. In exercising a sound discretion in levying discriminating duties within the limit prescribed, care should be taken that it be done in a manner not to benefit the wealthy few at the expense of the toiling millions by taxing lowest the luxuries of life, or articles of superior quality and high price, which can only be consumed by the wealthy, and highest the necessaries of life, or articles of coarse quality and low price, which the poor and great mass of our people must consume. The burdens of government should as far as practicable be distributed justly and equally among all classes of our population. These general views, long entertained on this subject, I have deemed it proper to reiterate. It is a subject upon which conflicting interests of sections and occupations are supposed to exist, and a spirit of mutual concession and compromise in adjusting its details should be cherished by every part of our widespread country as the only means of preserving harmony and a cheerful acquiescence of all in the operation of our revenue laws. Our patriotic citizens in every part of the Union will readily submit to the payment of such taxes as shall be needed for the support of their Government, whether in peace or in war, if they are so levied as to distribute the burdens as equally as possible among them.

The authority "to impose and collect taxes, duties, tariffs, and excises" is essential for the Federal Government, which without it would have no way to support itself. When exercising this power by setting a tariff for government support, generating revenue should be the main goal, while providing protection should be a secondary benefit. If we were to flip this principle and make protection the main goal while treating revenue as a side issue, it would unfairly harm all interests that aren’t being protected. While raising duties for revenue, it is certainly appropriate to make distinctions within the revenue framework that provide some incidental protection to our domestic industries. There’s room to differentiate within revenue limits; however, going beyond those limits would not be a legitimate use of the power. It is believed that the incidental protection provided to our domestic industries through these distinctions will be sufficient. In making these distinctions, all domestic interests should be protected as equally as possible. Most of our population works in agriculture, while others are involved in manufacturing, trade, navigation, and the skilled trades. Each is engaged in their own work, and together their efforts make up our national industry. Taxing one part of this industry for the benefit of another would be unfair. None of these interests should rightfully claim an advantage over the others or profit by diminishing the others. All are entitled to the government’s support and protection. When making wise decisions about imposing differentiated duties within the set limits, care should be taken to ensure that it doesn’t benefit the wealthy few at the expense of the working millions by taxing luxuries or high-quality goods, which are only accessible to the rich, at lower rates, while taxing necessities and lower-quality goods, which the poor and the vast majority must buy, at higher rates. The burdens of government should be spread as fairly and equally as possible across all population classes. I felt it necessary to restate these general principles, which have been held for a long time. This is a matter where various sections and professions might have conflicting interests, so a spirit of compromise and cooperation in working out the details should be embraced by all parts of our diverse nation as the only way to maintain harmony and agreement on our tax laws. Our patriotic citizens across the Union will willingly pay the taxes necessary to support their government, whether in times of peace or war, as long as those taxes are levied to spread the burdens as equally as possible among them.

The Republic of Texas has made known her desire to come into our Union, to form a part of our Confederacy and enjoy with us the blessings of liberty secured and guaranteed by our Constitution. Texas was once a part of our country—was unwisely ceded away to a foreign power—is now independent, and possesses an undoubted right to dispose of a part or the whole of her territory and to merge her sovereignty as a separate and independent state in ours. I congratulate my country that by an act of the late Congress of the United States the assent of this Government has been given to the reunion, and it only remains for the two countries to agree upon the terms to consummate an object so important to both.

The Republic of Texas has expressed its desire to join our Union, to be part of our Confederacy, and to enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. Texas was once part of our nation—unfortunately given away to a foreign power—and is now independent, holding a clear right to decide the fate of its land and to combine its sovereignty as a separate and independent state with ours. I’m happy for my country that, through an act of the recent Congress of the United States, our government has approved this reunion. Now it just needs the two countries to settle on the terms to finalize this important agreement for both.

I regard the question of annexation as belonging exclusively to the United States and Texas. They are independent powers competent to contract, and foreign nations have no right to interfere with them or to take exceptions to their reunion. Foreign powers do not seem to appreciate the true character of our Government. Our Union is a confederation of independent States, whose policy is peace with each other and all the world. To enlarge its limits is to extend the dominions of peace over additional territories and increasing millions. The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government. While the Chief Magistrate and the popular branch of Congress are elected for short terms by the suffrages of those millions who must in their own persons bear all the burdens and miseries of war, our Government can not be otherwise than pacific. Foreign powers should therefore look on the annexation of Texas to the United States not as the conquest of a nation seeking to extend her dominions by arms and violence, but as the peaceful acquisition of a territory once her own, by adding another member to our confederation, with the consent of that member, thereby diminishing the chances of war and opening to them new and ever-increasing markets for their products.

I see the issue of annexation as something that solely concerns the United States and Texas. They are independent entities capable of making agreements, and foreign nations have no right to interfere or object to their union. Foreign powers don’t seem to understand the true nature of our government. Our Union is a coalition of independent states, committed to peace with each other and with the rest of the world. Expanding its borders means spreading peace over more territories and more people. The world has nothing to fear from military ambitions in our government. Since the President and the elected representatives in Congress serve short terms and are accountable to millions who would bear the costs and hardships of war, our government is inherently peaceful. Therefore, foreign powers should view the annexation of Texas to the United States not as a nation conquering another to expand its territory through force, but as a peaceful addition of a territory that was once part of it, done with that territory’s consent. This would reduce the likelihood of war and open up new, expanding markets for their products.

To Texas the reunion is important, because the strong protecting arm of our Government would be extended over her, and the vast resources of her fertile soil and genial climate would be speedily developed, while the safety of New Orleans and of our whole southwestern frontier against hostile aggression, as well as the interests of the whole Union, would be promoted by it.

To Texas, the reunion is important because the strong support of our Government would be extended to her, and the abundant resources of her fertile soil and friendly climate would be quickly developed. At the same time, this would enhance the safety of New Orleans and our entire southwestern frontier against hostile threats, as well as benefit the interests of the entire Union.

In the earlier stages of our national existence the opinion prevailed with some that our system of confederated States could not operate successfully over an extended territory, and serious objections have at different times been made to the enlargement of our boundaries. These objections were earnestly urged when we acquired Louisiana. Experience has shown that they were not well founded. The title of numerous Indian tribes to vast tracts of country has been extinguished; new States have been admitted into the Union; new Territories have been created and our jurisdiction and laws extended over them. As our population has expanded, the Union has been cemented and strengthened. AS our boundaries have been enlarged and our agricultural population has been spread over a large surface, our federative system has acquired additional strength and security. It may well be doubted whether it would not be in greater danger of overthrow if our present population were confined to the comparatively narrow limits of the original thirteen States than it is now that they are sparsely settled over a more expanded territory. It is confidently believed that our system may be safely extended to the utmost bounds of our territorial limits, and that as it shall be extended the bonds of our Union, so far from being weakened, will become stronger.

In the early days of our nation, some people believed that our system of united States couldn’t effectively work over a large area, and there were serious concerns at various times about expanding our borders. These concerns were strongly voiced when we acquired Louisiana. However, experience has shown that those worries were unfounded. Many Indian tribes have given up their claims to vast areas of land; new States have joined the Union; new Territories have been established, and our laws and authority have been applied to them. As our population has grown, the Union has become more united and resilient. As our borders have expanded and our agricultural population has spread over a larger area, our federal system has gained more strength and stability. It’s reasonable to question whether it would be more at risk of collapse if our current population were limited to the relatively small area of the original thirteen States, rather than being more broadly dispersed across a larger territory. We firmly believe that our system can be safely extended to the farthest reaches of our territorial boundaries, and that as it expands, the ties of our Union will not weaken but will actually become stronger.

None can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent state or becomes an ally or dependency of some foreign nation more powerful than herself. Is there one among our citizens who would not prefer perpetual peace with Texas to occasional wars, which so often occur between bordering independent nations? Is there one who would not prefer free intercourse with her to high duties on all our products and manufactures which enter her ports or cross her frontiers? Is there one who would not prefer an unrestricted communication with her citizens to the frontier obstructions which must occur if she remains out of the Union? Whatever is good or evil in the local institutions of Texas will remain her own whether annexed to the United States or not. None of the present States will be responsible for them any more than they are for the local institutions of each other. They have confederated together for certain specified objects. Upon the same principle that they would refuse to form a perpetual union with Texas because of her local institutions our forefathers would have been prevented from forming our present Union. Perceiving no valid objection to the measure and many reasons for its adoption vitally affecting the peace, the safety, and the prosperity of both countries, I shall on the broad principle which formed the basis and produced the adoption of our Constitution, and not in any narrow spirit of sectional policy, endeavor by all Constitutional, honorable, and appropriate means to consummate the expressed will of the people and Government of the United States by the reannexation of Texas to our Union at the earliest practicable period.

No one can ignore the threat to our safety and future peace if Texas stays an independent state or becomes an ally or dependency of a foreign nation that's more powerful than it is. Is there anyone among us who would rather have ongoing conflict with Texas than a lasting peace? Is there anyone who would choose huge tariffs on all our goods and products entering her ports or crossing her borders over free trade? Is there anyone who wouldn’t prefer open communication with her citizens instead of the barriers that would exist if she stays out of the Union? Whatever is good or bad about Texas's local institutions will stay her own, whether or not she joins the United States. No current states will be accountable for them any more than they are for each other's local institutions. They have come together for specific shared purposes. Just as they would refuse to form a permanent union with Texas due to her local institutions, our forefathers would have been unable to establish our present Union. Seeing no valid objections to this plan and many reasons for its adoption, which are crucial to the peace, safety, and success of both nations, I will, based on the broad principle that underpinned and led to the adoption of our Constitution, and not from a narrow focus on sectional interests, strive by all constitutional, honorable, and appropriate means to fulfill the expressed desire of the people and Government of the United States for the reannexation of Texas to our Union as soon as possible.

Nor will it become in a less degree my duty to assert and maintain by all constitutional means the right of the United States to that portion of our territory which lies beyond the Rocky Mountains. Our title to the country of the Oregon is "clear and unquestionable," and already are our people preparing to perfect that title by occupying it with their wives and children. But eighty years ago our population was confined on the west by the ridge of the Alleghanies. Within that period—within the lifetime, I might say, of some of my hearers—our people, increasing to many millions, have filled the eastern valley of the Mississippi, adventurously ascended the Missouri to its headsprings, and are already engaged in establishing the blessings of self-government in valleys of which the rivers flow to the Pacific. The world beholds the peaceful triumphs of the industry of our emigrants. To us belongs the duty of protecting them adequately wherever they may be upon our soil. The jurisdiction of our laws and the benefits of our republican institutions should be extended over them in the distant regions which they have selected for their homes. The increasing facilities of intercourse will easily bring the States, of which the formation in that part of our territory can not be long delayed, within the sphere of our federative Union. In the meantime every obligation imposed by treaty or conventional stipulations should be sacredly respected.

Nor will it be any less my duty to assert and defend by all constitutional means the right of the United States to that part of our territory beyond the Rocky Mountains. Our claim to Oregon is "clear and indisputable," and our people are already getting ready to strengthen that claim by settling there with their families. Just eighty years ago, our population was limited in the west by the Allegheny Mountains. During this time—within the lifetime of some of my audience—our population has grown to millions, filling the eastern Mississippi Valley, boldly traveling up the Missouri River to its sources, and actively working to establish the benefits of self-government in valleys where the rivers flow to the Pacific. The world sees the peaceful successes of our emigrants' efforts. We have the responsibility to protect them adequately wherever they are on our land. The reach of our laws and the advantages of our democratic institutions should extend to them in the far-off regions they have chosen for their homes. The growing ease of communication will soon bring the states formed in that part of our territory into our federal Union. In the meantime, every obligation set forth by treaties or agreements should be strictly honored.

In the management of our foreign relations it will be my aim to observe a careful respect for the rights of other nations, while our own will be the subject of constant watchfulness. Equal and exact justice should characterize all our intercourse with foreign countries. All alliances having a tendency to jeopard the welfare and honor of our country or sacrifice any one of the national interests will be studiously avoided, and yet no opportunity will be lost to cultivate a favorable understanding with foreign governments by which our navigation and commerce may be extended and the ample products of our fertile soil, as well as the manufactures of our skillful artisans, find a ready market and remunerating prices in foreign countries.

In managing our foreign relations, I intend to maintain a careful respect for the rights of other nations, while keeping a constant watch on our own. Our interactions with foreign countries should be marked by fairness and justice. We will actively avoid any alliances that could put our country's welfare or honor at risk or compromise any of our national interests. At the same time, we will seize every opportunity to build good relationships with foreign governments, so our trade and navigation can grow, and the rich products of our fertile land, as well as the goods made by our skilled workers, can find a ready market and fair prices abroad.

In taking "care that the laws be faithfully executed," a strict performance of duty will be exacted from all public officers. From those officers, especially, who are charged with the collection and disbursement of the public revenue will prompt and rigid accountability be required. Any culpable failure or delay on their part to account for the moneys intrusted to them at the times and in the manner required by law will in every instance terminate the official connection of such defaulting officer with the Government.

In ensuring that the laws are properly enforced, all public officials will be held to a high standard of duty. This is especially true for those responsible for collecting and managing public funds, who will be required to be prompt and strictly accountable. Any significant failure or delay on their part to account for the money entrusted to them, at the times and in the ways stipulated by law, will result in the end of their official position with the Government.

Although in our country the Chief Magistrate must almost of necessity be chosen by a party and stand pledged to its principles and measures, yet in his official action he should not be the President of a part only, but of the whole people of the United States. While he executes the laws with an impartial hand, shrinks from no proper responsibility, and faithfully carries out in the executive department of the Government the principles and policy of those who have chosen him, he should not be unmindful that our fellow-citizens who have differed with him in opinion are entitled to the full and free exercise of their opinions and judgments, and that the rights of all are entitled to respect and regard.

Even though in our country the Chief Magistrate is mostly chosen by a party and must commit to its principles and actions, he shouldn’t act as just the President of one faction, but as the leader of all the people of the United States. While he enforces the laws fairly, takes on appropriate responsibilities, and faithfully implements the principles and policies of those who elected him, he should also remember that our fellow citizens who disagree with him have the right to freely express their opinions and judgments, and that the rights of everyone deserve respect and consideration.

Confidently relying upon the aid and assistance of the coordinate departments of the Government in conducting our public affairs, I enter upon the discharge of the high duties which have been assigned me by the people, again humbly supplicating that Divine Being who has watched over and protected our beloved country from its infancy to the present hour to continue His gracious benedictions upon us, that we may continue to be a prosperous and happy people.

Confidently depending on the support and help of the various government departments in managing our public affairs, I begin to take on the important responsibilities assigned to me by the people, once again humbly asking the Divine Being who has watched over and protected our beloved country from its beginnings to this moment to keep blessing us, so we can continue to be a prosperous and happy people.






ZACHARY TAYLOR, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 5, 1849

[Transcriber's note: For the second time in the history of the Republic, March 4 fell on a Sunday. The inaugural ceremony was postponed until the following Monday, raising the question as to whether the Nation was without a President for a day. General Taylor, popularly known as "Old Rough and Ready," was famous for his exploits in the Mexican War. He never had voted in a national election until his own contest for the Presidency. Outgoing President Polk accompanied the general to the ceremony at the Capitol. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Roger Taney on the East Portico. After the ceremony, the new President attended several inaugural celebrations, including a ball that evening in a specially built pavilion on Judiciary Square.]

[Transcriber's note: For the second time in the history of the Republic, March 4 fell on a Sunday. The inaugural ceremony was postponed until the following Monday, raising the question of whether the Nation was without a President for a day. General Taylor, commonly known as "Old Rough and Ready," gained fame for his achievements during the Mexican War. He had never voted in a national election until he ran for the Presidency himself. Outgoing President Polk accompanied the general to the ceremony at the Capitol. The oath of office was given by Chief Justice Roger Taney on the East Portico. After the ceremony, the new President attended several inaugural celebrations, including a ball that evening in a specially constructed pavilion on Judiciary Square.]


Elected by the American people to the highest office known to our laws, I appear here to take the oath prescribed by the Constitution, and, in compliance with a time-honored custom, to address those who are now assembled.

Elected by the American people to the highest office defined by our laws, I am here to take the oath required by the Constitution and, following a long-standing tradition, to speak to everyone gathered here.

The confidence and respect shown by my countrymen in calling me to be the Chief Magistrate of a Republic holding a high rank among the nations of the earth have inspired me with feelings of the most profound gratitude; but when I reflect that the acceptance of the office which their partiality has bestowed imposes the discharge of the most arduous duties and involves the weightiest obligations, I am conscious that the position which I have been called to fill, though sufficient to satisfy the loftiest ambition, is surrounded by fearful responsibilities. Happily, however, in the performance of my new duties I shall not be without able cooperation. The legislative and judicial branches of the Government present prominent examples of distinguished civil attainments and matured experience, and it shall be my endeavor to call to my assistance in the Executive Departments individuals whose talents, integrity, and purity of character will furnish ample guaranties for the faithful and honorable performance of the trusts to be committed to their charge. With such aids and an honest purpose to do whatever is right, I hope to execute diligently, impartially, and for the best interests of the country the manifold duties devolved upon me.

The confidence and respect shown by my fellow citizens in choosing me as the Chief Magistrate of a Republic recognized among the nations of the world fill me with immense gratitude. However, when I think about the fact that accepting this role comes with demanding responsibilities and serious obligations, I realize that the position I’ve been called to, while it could satisfy the highest ambition, carries significant responsibilities. Fortunately, I won't be alone in carrying out my new duties. The legislative and judicial branches of the Government showcase remarkable achievements and valuable experience, and I will aim to recruit individuals for the Executive Departments whose skills, integrity, and strong character will ensure they handle their responsibilities faithfully and honorably. With such support and a genuine intention to do what is right, I hope to carry out my diverse responsibilities diligently, impartially, and in the best interests of the country.

In the discharge of these duties my guide will be the Constitution, which I this day swear to "preserve, protect, and defend." For the interpretation of that instrument I shall look to the decisions of the judicial tribunals established by its authority and to the practice of the Government under the earlier Presidents, who had so large a share in its formation. To the example of those illustrious patriots I shall always defer with reverence, and especially to his example who was by so many titles "the Father of his Country."

In carrying out these responsibilities, my guiding principle will be the Constitution, which I swear today to "preserve, protect, and defend." For interpreting that document, I will refer to the rulings of the courts established by its authority and to the practices of the government under previous Presidents, who played a significant role in its creation. I will always hold the example of those great patriots in high regard, especially the one known in many ways as "the Father of his Country."

To command the Army and Navy of the United States; with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties and to appoint ambassadors and other officers; to give to Congress information of the state of the Union and recommend such measures as he shall judge to be necessary; and to take care that the laws shall be faithfully executed—these are the most important functions intrusted to the President by the Constitution, and it may be expected that I shall briefly indicate the principles which will control me in their execution.

To lead the Army and Navy of the United States; with the advice and approval of the Senate, to create treaties and appoint ambassadors and other officials; to inform Congress about the state of the Union and suggest necessary actions; and to ensure that the laws are faithfully carried out—these are the main responsibilities assigned to the President by the Constitution, and I will outline the principles that will guide me in fulfilling them.

Chosen by the body of the people under the assurance that my Administration would be devoted to the welfare of the whole country, and not to the support of any particular section or merely local interest, I this day renew the declarations I have heretofore made and proclaim my fixed determination to maintain to the extent of my ability the Government in its original purity and to adopt as the basis of my public policy those great republican doctrines which constitute the strength of our national existence.

Chosen by the people with the promise that my administration would focus on the well-being of the entire country, rather than just favoring specific regions or local interests, I today reaffirm the statements I've made before and declare my strong commitment to uphold the government in its original form. I will base my public policy on the fundamental republican principles that are the foundation of our national identity.

In reference to the Army and Navy, lately employed with so much distinction on active service, care shall be taken to insure the highest condition of efficiency, and in furtherance of that object the military and naval schools, sustained by the liberality of Congress, shall receive the special attention of the Executive.

In relation to the Army and Navy, which have recently served with great distinction, steps will be taken to ensure they remain at peak efficiency. To support this goal, the military and naval schools, funded by Congress, will be given special attention by the Executive.

As American freemen we can not but sympathize in all efforts to extend the blessings of civil and political liberty, but at the same time we are warned by the admonitions of history and the voice of our own beloved Washington to abstain from entangling alliances with foreign nations. In all disputes between conflicting governments it is our interest not less than our duty to remain strictly neutral, while our geographical position, the genius of our institutions and our people, the advancing spirit of civilization, and, above all, the dictates of religion direct us to the cultivation of peaceful and friendly relations with all other powers. It is to be hoped that no international question can now arise which a government confident in its own strength and resolved to protect its own just rights may not settle by wise negotiation; and it eminently becomes a government like our own, founded on the morality and intelligence of its citizens and upheld by their affections, to exhaust every resort of honorable diplomacy before appealing to arms. In the conduct of our foreign relations I shall conform to these views, as I believe them essential to the best interests and the true honor of the country.

As American citizens, we can't help but support all efforts to promote civil and political freedom. At the same time, history and our beloved Washington remind us to avoid complicated alliances with foreign nations. In all conflicts between governments, it's not just our duty but also in our best interest to stay neutral. Our geographical location, the nature of our institutions and people, the progress of civilization, and, most importantly, our religious beliefs guide us to foster peaceful and friendly relations with all countries. We hope that no international issue will arise that a government confident in its strength and committed to defending its rights can't resolve through wise negotiation. A government like ours, built on the morality and intelligence of its citizens and maintained by their support, should use every honorable diplomatic option before resorting to military action. In managing our foreign relations, I will adhere to these principles, as I believe they are crucial for the country's best interests and true honor.

The appointing power vested in the President imposes delicate and onerous duties. So far as it is possible to be informed, I shall make honesty, capacity, and fidelity indispensable prerequisites to the bestowal of office, and the absence of either of these qualities shall be deemed sufficient cause for removal.

The authority granted to the President comes with serious and challenging responsibilities. As much as I can stay informed, I will require honesty, capability, and loyalty as essential qualifications for any position, and the lack of any of these traits will be a valid reason for dismissal.

It shall be my study to recommend such constitutional measures to Congress as may be necessary and proper to secure encouragement and protection to the great interests of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures, to improve our rivers and harbors, to provide for the speedy extinguishment of the public debt, to enforce a strict accountability on the part of all officers of the Government and the utmost economy in all public expenditures; but it is for the wisdom of Congress itself, in which all legislative powers are vested by the Constitution, to regulate these and other matters of domestic policy. I shall look with confidence to the enlightened patriotism of that body to adopt such measures of conciliation as may harmonize conflicting interests and tend to perpetuate that Union which should be the paramount object of our hopes and affections. In any action calculated to promote an object so near the heart of everyone who truly loves his country I will zealously unite with the coordinate branches of the Government.

I will make it my mission to suggest constitutional measures to Congress that are necessary and appropriate to support and protect the vital interests of agriculture, commerce, and manufacturing, to enhance our rivers and harbors, to ensure the quick elimination of the public debt, to hold all government officials strictly accountable, and to promote maximum efficiency in public spending. However, it is up to Congress itself, where all legislative powers are granted by the Constitution, to manage these and other aspects of domestic policy. I will confidently rely on the enlightened patriotism of that body to adopt conciliatory measures that can harmonize differing interests and work towards preserving the Union, which should be the main focus of our hopes and dreams. In any effort aimed at promoting a goal so important to anyone who truly loves their country, I will eagerly collaborate with the other branches of the Government.

In conclusion I congratulate you, my fellow-citizens, upon the high state of prosperity to which the goodness of Divine Providence has conducted our common country. Let us invoke a continuance of the same protecting care which has led us from small beginnings to the eminence we this day occupy, and let us seek to deserve that continuance by prudence and moderation in our councils, by well-directed attempts to assuage the bitterness which too often marks unavoidable differences of opinion, by the promulgation and practice of just and liberal principles, and by an enlarged patriotism, which shall acknowledge no limits but those of our own widespread Republic.

In conclusion, I want to congratulate you, my fellow citizens, on the high level of prosperity that Divine Providence has brought to our country. Let’s ask for continued protection that has guided us from humble beginnings to the prominence we enjoy today, and let’s work to deserve that support through wisdom and restraint in our decision-making, by effectively addressing the conflicts that often arise from differing opinions, by promoting and practicing fair and generous values, and by embracing a broad sense of patriotism that recognizes no boundaries except those of our expansive Republic.






FRANKLIN PIERCE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, MARCH 4, 1853

[Transcriber's note: On religious grounds, former Senator and Congressman Franklin Pierce chose "to affirm" rather than "to swear" the executive oath of office. He was the only President to use the choice offered by the Constitution. Famed as an officer of a volunteer brigade in the Mexican War, he was nominated as the Democratic candidate in the national convention on the 49th ballot. His name had not been placed in nomination until the 35th polling of the delegates. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. Several weeks before arriving in Washington, the Pierces' only surviving child had been killed in a train accident.]

[Transcriber's note: For religious reasons, former Senator and Congressman Franklin Pierce chose "to affirm" instead of "to swear" the executive oath of office. He was the only President to take this option given by the Constitution. Known for his role as an officer in a volunteer brigade during the Mexican War, he was nominated as the Democratic candidate at the national convention on the 49th ballot. His name hadn’t been put forward until the 35th voting round of the delegates. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. A few weeks before arriving in Washington, the Pierces' only surviving child had died in a train accident.]


My Countrymen:

My Fellow Citizens:

It is a relief to feel that no heart but my own can know the personal regret and bitter sorrow over which I have been borne to a position so suitable for others rather than desirable for myself.

It’s a relief to know that no one but me can understand the personal regret and deep sadness that come from being in a position that's great for others but not what I truly want.

The circumstances under which I have been called for a limited period to preside over the destinies of the Republic fill me with a profound sense of responsibility, but with nothing like shrinking apprehension. I repair to the post assigned me not as to one sought, but in obedience to the unsolicited expression of your will, answerable only for a fearless, faithful, and diligent exercise of my best powers. I ought to be, and am, truly grateful for the rare manifestation of the nation's confidence; but this, so far from lightening my obligations, only adds to their weight. You have summoned me in my weakness; you must sustain me by your strength. When looking for the fulfillment of reasonable requirements, you will not be unmindful of the great changes which have occurred, even within the last quarter of a century, and the consequent augmentation and complexity of duties imposed in the administration both of your home and foreign affairs.

The situation in which I've been asked to lead the Republic for a limited time gives me a deep sense of responsibility, but I don't feel intimidated. I'm stepping into this role not because I sought it, but in response to your clear wishes, and I am only accountable for carrying out my duties with courage, loyalty, and dedication. I should be, and truly am, grateful for the rare show of trust from the nation; however, this confidence only adds to my responsibilities instead of easing them. You have called on me in my vulnerability; you must support me with your strength. As you expect reasonable outcomes, please keep in mind the significant changes that have happened even in the last 25 years, which have increased and complicated the tasks involved in managing both your domestic and international affairs.

Whether the elements of inherent force in the Republic have kept pace with its unparalleled progression in territory, population, and wealth has been the subject of earnest thought and discussion on both sides of the ocean. Less than sixty-four years ago the Father of his Country made "the" then "recent accession of the important State of North Carolina to the Constitution of the United States" one of the subjects of his special congratulation. At that moment, however, when the agitation consequent upon the Revolutionary struggle had hardly subsided, when we were just emerging from the weakness and embarrassments of the Confederation, there was an evident consciousness of vigor equal to the great mission so wisely and bravely fulfilled by our fathers. It was not a presumptuous assurance, but a calm faith, springing from a clear view of the sources of power in a government constituted like ours. It is no paradox to say that although comparatively weak the new-born nation was intrinsically strong. Inconsiderable in population and apparent resources, it was upheld by a broad and intelligent comprehension of rights and an all-pervading purpose to maintain them, stronger than armaments. It came from the furnace of the Revolution, tempered to the necessities of the times. The thoughts of the men of that day were as practical as their sentiments were patriotic. They wasted no portion of their energies upon idle and delusive speculations, but with a firm and fearless step advanced beyond the governmental landmarks which had hitherto circumscribed the limits of human freedom and planted their standard, where it has stood against dangers which have threatened from abroad, and internal agitation, which has at times fearfully menaced at home. They proved themselves equal to the solution of the great problem, to understand which their minds had been illuminated by the dawning lights of the Revolution. The object sought was not a thing dreamed of; it was a thing realized. They had exhibited only the power to achieve, but, what all history affirms to be so much more unusual, the capacity to maintain. The oppressed throughout the world from that day to the present have turned their eyes hitherward, not to find those lights extinguished or to fear lest they should wane, but to be constantly cheered by their steady and increasing radiance.

Whether the elements of inherent strength in the Republic have kept up with its remarkable growth in land, population, and wealth has been a topic of serious consideration and debate on both sides of the ocean. Less than sixty-four years ago, the Father of His Country highlighted “the” then “recent addition of the important State of North Carolina to the Constitution of the United States” as one of his key points of congratulations. At that time, however, when the tensions following the Revolutionary struggle had barely settled and we were just beginning to recover from the weaknesses and challenges of the Confederation, there was a clear sense of vigor matched to the significant mission so wisely and bravely carried out by our founders. It was not an arrogant confidence, but a calm belief, rooted in a clear understanding of the sources of power in a government structured like ours. It’s no contradiction to say that although the new nation was relatively weak, it was inherently strong. Small in population and seemingly limited in resources, it was sustained by a broad and educated understanding of rights and an unwavering commitment to uphold them, stronger than any military force. It emerged from the trials of the Revolution, shaped to meet the needs of the time. The thoughts of the people of that era were as practical as their feelings were patriotic. They didn’t waste their energy on pointless and misleading theories, but with determined and courageous steps, they moved beyond the governmental boundaries that had previously limited human freedom and raised their flag, where it has remained against threats from abroad and internal unrest that has at times dangerously challenged us at home. They proved they were capable of solving the great issues that had been illuminated by the early insights of the Revolution. The goal they pursued was not a mere dream; it was a reality they achieved. They demonstrated not only the ability to succeed but, what all of history shows to be much rarer, the ability to sustain that success. The oppressed around the world, from that day until now, have looked towards us, not to find those lights extinguished or to fear their dimming, but to find joy in their steady and growing glow.

In this our country has, in my judgment, thus far fulfilled its highest duty to suffering humanity. It has spoken and will continue to speak, not only by its words, but by its acts, the language of sympathy, encouragement, and hope to those who earnestly listen to tones which pronounce for the largest rational liberty. But after all, the most animating encouragement and potent appeal for freedom will be its own history—its trials and its triumphs. Preeminently, the power of our advocacy reposes in our example; but no example, be it remembered, can be powerful for lasting good, whatever apparent advantages may be gained, which is not based upon eternal principles of right and justice. Our fathers decided for themselves, both upon the hour to declare and the hour to strike. They were their own judges of the circumstances under which it became them to pledge to each other "their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor" for the acquisition of the priceless inheritance transmitted to us. The energy with which that great conflict was opened and, under the guidance of a manifest and beneficent Providence the uncomplaining endurance with which it was prosecuted to its consummation were only surpassed by the wisdom and patriotic spirit of concession which characterized all the counsels of the early fathers.

In my opinion, our country has so far done its greatest duty to suffering humanity. It has communicated and will keep communicating, not just through its words, but through its actions, the language of empathy, support, and hope to those who genuinely pay attention to the messages advocating for the greatest rational freedom. However, ultimately, the most inspiring encouragement and powerful call for freedom will come from its own history—its struggles and its victories. The real strength of our advocacy lies in our example; but let's remember, no example can create lasting good, regardless of any apparent benefits, unless it’s based on timeless principles of right and justice. Our founding fathers decided for themselves when to declare and when to act. They judged for themselves the circumstances under which they would pledge to each other "their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor" for the priceless inheritance passed down to us. The vigor with which that monumental struggle began, and the patient endurance with which it was carried out under the guidance of a clear and benevolent Providence, was only exceeded by the wisdom and patriotic spirit of compromise that characterized all the discussions of the early fathers.

One of the most impressive evidences of that wisdom is to be found in the fact that the actual working of our system has dispelled a degree of solicitude which at the outset disturbed bold hearts and far-reaching intellects. The apprehension of dangers from extended territory, multiplied States, accumulated wealth, and augmented population has proved to be unfounded. The stars upon your banner have become nearly threefold their original number; your densely populated possessions skirt the shores of the two great oceans; and yet this vast increase of people and territory has not only shown itself compatible with the harmonious action of the States and Federal Government in their respective constitutional spheres, but has afforded an additional guaranty of the strength and integrity of both.

One of the most impressive pieces of evidence of that wisdom can be seen in the fact that how our system actually works has eased a level of concern that initially troubled brave hearts and sharp minds. The fear of dangers posed by expanded territory, more states, increased wealth, and a growing population has turned out to be unfounded. The stars on your flag have nearly tripled since the beginning; your densely populated regions border both great oceans; and yet this huge growth in people and land has not only proven to be compatible with the smooth functioning of both the states and the federal government in their respective constitutional roles, but has also strengthened the reliability and unity of both.

With an experience thus suggestive and cheering, the policy of my Administration will not be controlled by any timid forebodings of evil from expansion. Indeed, it is not to be disguised that our attitude as a nation and our position on the globe render the acquisition of certain possessions not within our jurisdiction eminently important for our protection, if not in the future essential for the preservation of the rights of commerce and the peace of the world. Should they be obtained, it will be through no grasping spirit, but with a view to obvious national interest and security, and in a manner entirely consistent with the strictest observance of national faith. We have nothing in our history or position to invite aggression; we have everything to beckon us to the cultivation of relations of peace and amity with all nations. Purposes, therefore, at once just and pacific will be significantly marked in the conduct of our foreign affairs. I intend that my Administration shall leave no blot upon our fair record, and trust I may safely give the assurance that no act within the legitimate scope of my constitutional control will be tolerated on the part of any portion of our citizens which can not challenge a ready justification before the tribunal of the civilized world. An Administration would be unworthy of confidence at home or respect abroad should it cease to be influenced by the conviction that no apparent advantage can be purchased at a price so dear as that of national wrong or dishonor. It is not your privilege as a nation to speak of a distant past. The striking incidents of your history, replete with instruction and furnishing abundant grounds for hopeful confidence, are comprised in a period comparatively brief. But if your past is limited, your future is boundless. Its obligations throng the unexplored pathway of advancement, and will be limitless as duration. Hence a sound and comprehensive policy should embrace not less the distant future than the urgent present.

With such an encouraging and uplifting experience, my Administration's policy won't be driven by any fearful thoughts about the risks of expansion. In fact, it’s clear that our status as a nation and our geographic position make acquiring certain territories outside our control crucial for our protection and potentially vital for maintaining trade rights and global peace in the future. If these territories are acquired, it will not be due to greed, but rather for clear national interests and security, and in a way that fully honors our commitments. Our history and position do not invite aggression; instead, they call us to build peaceful and friendly relationships with all nations. Thus, our foreign affairs will be guided by just and peaceful intentions. I aim for my Administration to maintain our good reputation, and I assure you that no actions within my constitutional authority will be tolerated if they cannot be easily justified to the civilized world. An Administration that fails to be guided by the belief that no apparent gain is worth the cost of national wrongdoing or dishonor would not deserve trust at home or respect abroad. As a nation, you shouldn’t dwell on a distant past. The significant events of your history, full of lessons and hope, are rooted in a relatively short timeframe. But while your past may be limited, your future is limitless. Its responsibilities will fill the uncharted path of progress, boundless as time itself. Therefore, a solid and inclusive policy should focus on both the distant future and the immediate present.

The great objects of our pursuit as a people are best to be attained by peace, and are entirely consistent with the tranquillity and interests of the rest of mankind. With the neighboring nations upon our continent we should cultivate kindly and fraternal relations. We can desire nothing in regard to them so much as to see them consolidate their strength and pursue the paths of prosperity and happiness. If in the course of their growth we should open new channels of trade and create additional facilities for friendly intercourse, the benefits realized will be equal and mutual. Of the complicated European systems of national polity we have heretofore been independent. From their wars, their tumults, and anxieties we have been, happily, almost entirely exempt. Whilst these are confined to the nations which gave them existence, and within their legitimate jurisdiction, they can not affect us except as they appeal to our sympathies in the cause of human freedom and universal advancement. But the vast interests of commerce are common to all mankind, and the advantages of trade and international intercourse must always present a noble field for the moral influence of a great people.

The main goals of our society are best achieved through peace, and they align completely with the well-being and interests of everyone else. We should foster friendly and brotherly relationships with the neighboring countries on our continent. We want nothing more than to see them grow stronger and seek prosperity and happiness. As they develop, if we open up new trade routes and create more opportunities for friendly interactions, the benefits will be shared and mutual. We have previously operated independently from the complex political systems in Europe. Luckily, we've been mostly free from their wars, turmoil, and worries. As long as these issues stay within the nations that created them and within their rightful boundaries, they won’t impact us except when they resonate with our compassion for human freedom and universal progress. However, the vast interests of commerce belong to everyone, and the benefits of trade and international interaction will always provide an excellent opportunity for the moral influence of a great nation.

With these views firmly and honestly carried out, we have a right to expect, and shall under all circumstances require, prompt reciprocity. The rights which belong to us as a nation are not alone to be regarded, but those which pertain to every citizen in his individual capacity, at home and abroad, must be sacredly maintained. So long as he can discern every star in its place upon that ensign, without wealth to purchase for him preferment or title to secure for him place, it will be his privilege, and must be his acknowledged right, to stand unabashed even in the presence of princes, with a proud consciousness that he is himself one of a nation of sovereigns and that he can not in legitimate pursuit wander so far from home that the agent whom he shall leave behind in the place which I now occupy will not see that no rude hand of power or tyrannical passion is laid upon him with impunity. He must realize that upon every sea and on every soil where our enterprise may rightfully seek the protection of our flag American citizenship is an inviolable panoply for the security of American rights. And in this connection it can hardly be necessary to reaffirm a principle which should now be regarded as fundamental. The rights, security, and repose of this Confederacy reject the idea of interference or colonization on this side of the ocean by any foreign power beyond present jurisdiction as utterly inadmissible.

With these views firmly and honestly put into action, we have the right to expect, and will always demand, quick reciprocity. The rights that belong to us as a nation should not only be considered, but those that belong to every citizen individually, both at home and abroad, must be carefully protected. As long as he can see every star in its place on that flag, without wealth to buy him favors or titles to secure his position, it will be his privilege, and must be his acknowledged right, to stand confidently even in the presence of kings, with the proud understanding that he is part of a nation of sovereigns and that he cannot wander too far from home in his legitimate pursuits without the representative he leaves behind ensuring that no abusive power or tyrannical force is exerted against him without consequences. He must understand that on every sea and in every land where our endeavors rightfully seek the protection of our flag, American citizenship is an unbreakable shield for the security of American rights. In this context, it's hardly necessary to restate a principle that should now be considered fundamental. The rights, security, and peace of this Confederacy reject any notion of interference or colonization from any foreign power across this ocean, beyond current jurisdiction, as completely unacceptable.

The opportunities of observation furnished by my brief experience as a soldier confirmed in my own mind the opinion, entertained and acted upon by others from the formation of the Government, that the maintenance of large standing armies in our country would be not only dangerous, but unnecessary. They also illustrated the importance—I might well say the absolute necessity—of the military science and practical skill furnished in such an eminent degree by the institution which has made your Army what it is, under the discipline and instruction of officers not more distinguished for their solid attainments, gallantry, and devotion to the public service than for unobtrusive bearing and high moral tone. The Army as organized must be the nucleus around which in every time of need the strength of your military power, the sure bulwark of your defense—a national militia—may be readily formed into a well-disciplined and efficient organization. And the skill and self-devotion of the Navy assure you that you may take the performance of the past as a pledge for the future, and may confidently expect that the flag which has waved its untarnished folds over every sea will still float in undiminished honor. But these, like many other subjects, will be appropriately brought at a future time to the attention of the coordinate branches of the Government, to which I shall always look with profound respect and with trustful confidence that they will accord to me the aid and support which I shall so much need and which their experience and wisdom will readily suggest.

The insights I gained from my short time as a soldier confirmed my belief, shared by many since the Government was established, that having large standing armies in our country would be both dangerous and unnecessary. They also highlighted the importance—I could even say the absolute necessity—of the military knowledge and practical skills provided in such an exceptional manner by the institution that has shaped your Army into what it is today, guided by officers who are not only known for their solid expertise, bravery, and dedication to public service but also for their unassuming demeanor and strong moral character. The organized Army should serve as the core around which we can form a national militia in times of need, providing the strength of your military power and a reliable shield for defense, transforming it into a well-disciplined and effective force. The skills and commitment of the Navy assure you that you can count on past performance as a guarantee for the future, and you can confidently expect that the flag that has proudly flown over every sea will continue to do so with unwavering honor. However, these topics, like many others, will be addressed in due course by the relevant branches of the Government, to which I will always look with deep respect and trust, confident that they will provide the support and assistance I will greatly need, drawing on their experience and wisdom.

In the administration of domestic affairs you expect a devoted integrity in the public service and an observance of rigid economy in all departments, so marked as never justly to be questioned. If this reasonable expectation be not realized, I frankly confess that one of your leading hopes is doomed to disappointment, and that my efforts in a very important particular must result in a humiliating failure. Offices can be properly regarded only in the light of aids for the accomplishment of these objects, and as occupancy can confer no prerogative nor importunate desire for preferment any claim, the public interest imperatively demands that they be considered with sole reference to the duties to be performed. Good citizens may well claim the protection of good laws and the benign influence of good government, but a claim for office is what the people of a republic should never recognize. No reasonable man of any party will expect the Administration to be so regardless of its responsibility and of the obvious elements of success as to retain persons known to be under the influence of political hostility and partisan prejudice in positions which will require not only severe labor, but cordial cooperation. Having no implied engagements to ratify, no rewards to bestow, no resentments to remember, and no personal wishes to consult in selections for official station, I shall fulfill this difficult and delicate trust, admitting no motive as worthy either of my character or position which does not contemplate an efficient discharge of duty and the best interests of my country. I acknowledge my obligations to the masses of my countrymen, and to them alone. Higher objects than personal aggrandizement gave direction and energy to their exertions in the late canvass, and they shall not be disappointed. They require at my hands diligence, integrity, and capacity wherever there are duties to be performed. Without these qualities in their public servants, more stringent laws for the prevention or punishment of fraud, negligence, and peculation will be vain. With them they will be unnecessary.

In managing domestic affairs, you expect dedicated integrity in public service and strict economy in all departments, to the point that it should never reasonably be questioned. If this reasonable expectation isn't met, I must honestly admit that one of your main hopes will end in disappointment, and my efforts in this crucial area will result in a humiliating failure. Offices should only be viewed as tools for achieving these goals, and since holding an office doesn't grant any special privilege or a desperate desire for promotion, the public interest demands that they be considered solely in relation to the duties to be performed. Good citizens have every right to the protection of good laws and the positive influence of good government, but a claim for office is something the people of a republic should never accept. No reasonable person from any party will expect the Administration to be so careless of its responsibilities and the clear factors for success that it keeps individuals known to be influenced by political hostility and partisan bias in positions requiring both hard work and teamwork. With no implied commitments to honor, no rewards to distribute, no grudges to hold, and no personal preferences to consider in choosing officials, I will carry out this challenging and sensitive role, accepting no motive worthy of my character or position that doesn’t focus on fulfilling my duties effectively and serving the best interests of my country. I recognize my obligations to the majority of my fellow citizens, and to them alone. Higher goals than personal gain guided and motivated their efforts in the recent campaign, and they shall not be let down. They expect from me diligence, integrity, and ability wherever there are duties to fulfill. Without these qualities in their public servants, stronger laws to prevent or punish fraud, negligence, and theft will be pointless. With them, such laws will be unnecessary.

But these are not the only points to which you look for vigilant watchfulness. The dangers of a concentration of all power in the general government of a confederacy so vast as ours are too obvious to be disregarded. You have a right, therefore, to expect your agents in every department to regard strictly the limits imposed upon them by the Constitution of the United States. The great scheme of our constitutional liberty rests upon a proper distribution of power between the State and Federal authorities, and experience has shown that the harmony and happiness of our people must depend upon a just discrimination between the separate rights and responsibilities of the States and your common rights and obligations under the General Government; and here, in my opinion, are the considerations which should form the true basis of future concord in regard to the questions which have most seriously disturbed public tranquillity. If the Federal Government will confine itself to the exercise of powers clearly granted by the Constitution, it can hardly happen that its action upon any question should endanger the institutions of the States or interfere with their right to manage matters strictly domestic according to the will of their own people.

But these aren’t the only areas where you should stay alert. The risks of concentrating all power in the central government of a federation as large as ours are too clear to ignore. Therefore, you have the right to expect your representatives in every department to strictly adhere to the limits set by the Constitution of the United States. The foundation of our constitutional freedom relies on a proper distribution of power between state and federal authorities, and experience has shown that the well-being and happiness of our people depend on a fair distinction between the separate rights and responsibilities of the states and your shared rights and obligations under the federal government. In my view, these considerations should serve as the true basis for future harmony concerning the issues that have most seriously disrupted public peace. If the federal government limits itself to the powers explicitly granted by the Constitution, it’s unlikely that its actions on any issue will threaten the institutions of the states or interfere with their right to handle purely local matters according to the wishes of their own people.

In expressing briefly my views upon an important subject rich has recently agitated the nation to almost a fearful degree, I am moved by no other impulse than a most earnest desire for the perpetuation of that Union which has made us what we are, showering upon us blessings and conferring a power and influence which our fathers could hardly have anticipated, even with their most sanguine hopes directed to a far-off future. The sentiments I now announce were not unknown before the expression of the voice which called me here. My own position upon this subject was clear and unequivocal, upon the record of my words and my acts, and it is only recurred to at this time because silence might perhaps be misconstrued. With the Union my best and dearest earthly hopes are entwined. Without it what are we individually or collectively? What becomes of the noblest field ever opened for the advancement of our race in religion, in government, in the arts, and in all that dignifies and adorns mankind? From that radiant constellation which both illumines our own way and points out to struggling nations their course, let but a single star be lost, and, if these be not utter darkness, the luster of the whole is dimmed. Do my countrymen need any assurance that such a catastrophe is not to overtake them while I possess the power to stay it? It is with me an earnest and vital belief that as the Union has been the source, under Providence, of our prosperity to this time, so it is the surest pledge of a continuance of the blessings we have enjoyed, and which we are sacredly bound to transmit undiminished to our children. The field of calm and free discussion in our country is open, and will always be so, but never has been and never can be traversed for good in a spirit of sectionalism and uncharitableness. The founders of the Republic dealt with things as they were presented to them, in a spirit of self-sacrificing patriotism, and, as time has proved, with a comprehensive wisdom which it will always be safe for us to consult. Every measure tending to strengthen the fraternal feelings of all the members of our Union has had my heartfelt approbation. To every theory of society or government, whether the offspring of feverish ambition or of morbid enthusiasm, calculated to dissolve the bonds of law and affection which unite us, I shall interpose a ready and stern resistance. I believe that involuntary servitude, as it exists in different States of this Confederacy, is recognized by the Constitution. I believe that it stands like any other admitted right, and that the States where it exists are entitled to efficient remedies to enforce the constitutional provisions. I hold that the laws of 1850, commonly called the "compromise measures," are strictly constitutional and to be unhesitatingly carried into effect. I believe that the constituted authorities of this Republic are bound to regard the rights of the South in this respect as they would view any other legal and constitutional right, and that the laws to enforce them should be respected and obeyed, not with a reluctance encouraged by abstract opinions as to their propriety in a different state of society, but cheerfully and according to the decisions of the tribunal to which their exposition belongs. Such have been, and are, my convictions, and upon them I shall act. I fervently hope that the question is at rest, and that no sectional or ambitious or fanatical excitement may again threaten the durability of our institutions or obscure the light of our prosperity.

In briefly sharing my thoughts on an important issue that has recently stirred the nation to a considerable extent, I am driven solely by a sincere desire to preserve the Union that has shaped us, bringing us blessings and granting us a power and influence that our founders likely could not have imagined, even in their most hopeful visions for the distant future. The views I am expressing now were not unknown before the call that brought me here. My stance on this issue has always been clear and straightforward, evident in my words and actions, and I'm reiterating it now because silence could potentially be misinterpreted. My deepest hopes on this earth are tied to the Union. Without it, what are we, both individually and collectively? What happens to the grand opportunity we have for advancing our species in areas like religion, governance, the arts, and everything that elevates and enhances humanity? If we lose just one star from the brilliant constellation that guides us and shows struggling nations their path, the entire illumination dims, even if it doesn't vanish completely. Do my fellow countrymen really need reassurance that such a disaster won’t occur while I have the ability to prevent it? I firmly believe that just as the Union has been the source of our prosperity thus far, it remains the strongest assurance of continuing the blessings we’ve known and that we are morally obligated to pass on to our children unchanged. Our nation allows for calm and open discussion, and it will always do so, but such discussions can't be fruitful when driven by sectionalism and unkindness. The founders of our Republic faced issues as they arose, with a spirit of selfless patriotism and, as history has shown, with a wisdom that it’s always beneficial for us to heed. I have always supported every effort to strengthen the bonds of brotherhood among all members of our Union. I will firmly oppose any ideas about society or governance, whether rooted in restless ambition or misguided enthusiasm, that aim to dissolve the legal and emotional ties that connect us. I believe that involuntary servitude, as it currently exists in various states of this Confederacy, is acknowledged by the Constitution. I believe it holds the same status as any recognized right, and the states where it exists deserve effective means to uphold constitutional provisions. I maintain that the laws of 1850, known as the "compromise measures," are entirely constitutional and should be enforced without hesitation. I believe that the governing authorities of this Republic are obligated to respect Southern rights in this context just as they would any other legal and constitutional right, and the laws that enforce them should be followed and upheld, not with hesitance driven by abstract opinions concerning their suitability in a different societal setting, but willingly and in line with the rulings of the appropriate judicial authority. These have been, and are, my beliefs, and I will act on them. I sincerely hope that this issue is settled, and that sectional or ambitious zealotry does not once again jeopardize the stability of our institutions or obscure the brightness of our prosperity.

But let not the foundation of our hope rest upon man's wisdom. It will not be sufficient that sectional prejudices find no place in the public deliberations. It will not be sufficient that the rash counsels of human passion are rejected. It must be felt that there is no national security but in the nation's humble, acknowledged dependence upon God and His overruling providence.

But let's not base our hope on human wisdom. It's not enough for regional biases to be absent from public discussions. It's also not enough for the reckless advice driven by human emotions to be dismissed. We must realize that true national security comes from the nation's humble and recognized reliance on God and His guiding providence.

We have been carried in safety through a perilous crisis. Wise counsels, like those which gave us the Constitution, prevailed to uphold it. Let the period be remembered as an admonition, and not as an encouragement, in any section of the Union, to make experiments where experiments are fraught with such fearful hazard. Let it be impressed upon all hearts that, beautiful as our fabric is, no earthly power or wisdom could ever reunite its broken fragments. Standing, as I do, almost within view of the green slopes of Monticello, and, as it were, within reach of the tomb of Washington, with all the cherished memories of the past gathering around me like so many eloquent voices of exhortation from heaven, I can express no better hope for my country than that the kind Providence which smiled upon our fathers may enable their children to preserve the blessings they have inherited.

We’ve safely made it through a serious crisis. Wise advice, like that which led to the Constitution, helped us uphold it. Let this time be remembered as a warning, not as an invitation for any part of the Union to take risks that come with such great danger. It should be clear to everyone that, as beautiful as our country is, no earthly power or wisdom could ever put its broken pieces back together again. Standing here, almost in sight of the green hills of Monticello and, in a way, within reach of Washington's tomb, with all the treasured memories of the past surrounding me like so many inspiring voices from above, I can express no better hope for my country than that the kind Providence that smiled upon our forefathers may help their children keep the blessings they’ve inherited.






JAMES BUCHANAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1857

[Transcriber's note: The Democratic Party chose another candidate instead of their incumbent President when they nominated James Buchanan at the national convention. Since the Jackson Administration, he had a distinguished career as a Senator, Congressman, Cabinet officer, and ambassador. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Roger Taney on the East Portico of the Capitol. A parade had preceded the ceremony at the Capitol, and an inaugural ball was held that evening for 6,000 celebrants in a specially built hall on Judiciary Square.]

[Transcriber's note: The Democratic Party selected a different candidate instead of their sitting President when they nominated James Buchanan at the national convention. Since the Jackson Administration, he had a notable career as a Senator, Congressman, Cabinet member, and ambassador. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. A parade took place before the ceremony at the Capitol, and an inaugural ball was held that evening for 6,000 attendees in a specially constructed hall on Judiciary Square.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

I appear before you this day to take the solemn oath "that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

I stand before you today to take the serious oath "that I will faithfully carry out the duties of President of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

In entering upon this great office I must humbly invoke the God of our fathers for wisdom and firmness to execute its high and responsible duties in such a manner as to restore harmony and ancient friendship among the people of the several States and to preserve our free institutions throughout many generations. Convinced that I owe my election to the inherent love for the Constitution and the Union which still animates the hearts of the American people, let me earnestly ask their powerful support in sustaining all just measures calculated to perpetuate these, the richest political blessings which Heaven has ever bestowed upon any nation. Having determined not to become a candidate for reelection, I shall have no motive to influence my conduct in administering the Government except the desire ably and faithfully to serve my country and to live in grateful memory of my countrymen.

As I take on this important role, I must humbly ask the God of our forefathers for the wisdom and strength to carry out its significant and responsible duties in a way that restores harmony and friendship among the people of the different States and preserves our free institutions for generations to come. Believing that my election reflects the deep love for the Constitution and the Union that still lives in the hearts of the American people, I sincerely ask for their strong support in backing all fair measures aimed at preserving these, the greatest political blessings that Heaven has ever given to any nation. Since I have decided not to run for reelection, my only motivation in leading the Government will be the desire to serve my country well and to be remembered gratefully by my fellow citizens.

We have recently passed through a Presidential contest in which the passions of our fellow-citizens were excited to the highest degree by questions of deep and vital importance; but when the people proclaimed their will the tempest at once subsided and all was calm.

We recently went through a presidential election that stirred up intense emotions among our fellow citizens over issues of great significance; however, when the people expressed their decision, the frenzy quickly faded and everything became peaceful again.

The voice of the majority, speaking in the manner prescribed by the Constitution, was heard, and instant submission followed. Our own country could alone have exhibited so grand and striking a spectacle of the capacity of man for self-government.

The voice of the majority, speaking in the way outlined by the Constitution, was heard, and immediate compliance followed. Only our own country could have shown such a grand and impressive example of humanity's ability for self-governance.

What a happy conception, then, was it for Congress to apply this simple rule, that the will of the majority shall govern, to the settlement of the question of domestic slavery in the Territories. Congress is neither "to legislate slavery into any Territory or State nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States."

What a great idea it was for Congress to use this simple rule that the majority's will should guide the resolution of the issue of domestic slavery in the Territories. Congress is not supposed to "legislate slavery into any Territory or State nor to exclude it from there, but to let the people there fully free to create and manage their domestic institutions as they see fit, as long as they adhere to the Constitution of the United States."

As a natural consequence, Congress has also prescribed that when the Territory of Kansas shall be admitted as a State it "shall be received into the Union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission."

As a natural consequence, Congress has also stated that when the Territory of Kansas is admitted as a State, it "will be accepted into the Union with or without slavery, depending on what their constitution decides at the time of their admission."

A difference of opinion has arisen in regard to the point of time when the people of a Territory shall decide this question for themselves.

A disagreement has come up about when the people of a Territory should make this decision for themselves.

This is, happily, a matter of but little practical importance. Besides, it is a judicial question, which legitimately belongs to the Supreme Court of the United States, before whom it is now pending, and will, it is understood, be speedily and finally settled. To their decision, in common with all good citizens, I shall cheerfully submit, whatever this may be, though it has ever been my individual opinion that under the Nebraska-Kansas act the appropriate period will be when the number of actual residents in the Territory shall justify the formation of a constitution with a view to its admission as a State into the Union. But be this as it may, it is the imperative and indispensable duty of the Government of the United States to secure to every resident inhabitant the free and independent expression of his opinion by his vote. This sacred right of each individual must be preserved. That being accomplished, nothing can be fairer than to leave the people of a Territory free from all foreign interference to decide their own destiny for themselves, subject only to the Constitution of the United States.

This, fortunately, is not a matter of much practical importance. Additionally, it’s a legal issue that rightfully belongs to the Supreme Court of the United States, which is currently reviewing it and is expected to resolve it quickly and definitively. I, along with all good citizens, will accept their decision gladly, no matter what it may be, although I have always believed that under the Nebraska-Kansas Act, the suitable time will be when the number of actual residents in the Territory supports the creation of a constitution aimed at statehood in the Union. That said, it is the essential and non-negotiable duty of the United States Government to ensure that every resident has the freedom to express their opinion through their vote. This fundamental right of each individual must be protected. Once that is achieved, there’s nothing fairer than allowing the people of a Territory to determine their own future without any outside interference, as long as they comply with the Constitution of the United States.

The whole Territorial question being thus settled upon the principle of popular sovereignty—a principle as ancient as free government itself—everything of a practical nature has been decided. No other question remains for adjustment, because all agree that under the Constitution slavery in the States is beyond the reach of any human power except that of the respective States themselves wherein it exists. May we not, then, hope that the long agitation on this subject is approaching its end, and that the geographical parties to which it has given birth, so much dreaded by the Father of his Country, will speedily become extinct? Most happy will it be for the country when the public mind shall be diverted from this question to others of more pressing and practical importance. Throughout the whole progress of this agitation, which has scarcely known any intermission for more than twenty years, whilst it has been productive of no positive good to any human being it has been the prolific source of great evils to the master, to the slave, and to the whole country. It has alienated and estranged the people of the sister States from each other, and has even seriously endangered the very existence of the Union. Nor has the danger yet entirely ceased. Under our system there is a remedy for all mere political evils in the sound sense and sober judgment of the people. Time is a great corrective. Political subjects which but a few years ago excited and exasperated the public mind have passed away and are now nearly forgotten. But this question of domestic slavery is of far graver importance than any mere political question, because should the agitation continue it may eventually endanger the personal safety of a large portion of our countrymen where the institution exists. In that event no form of government, however admirable in itself and however productive of material benefits, can compensate for the loss of peace and domestic security around the family altar. Let every Union-loving man, therefore, exert his best influence to suppress this agitation, which since the recent legislation of Congress is without any legitimate object.

The entire Territorial issue is now settled based on the principle of popular sovereignty—a principle as old as free government itself—so all practical matters have been resolved. There are no more questions to address because everyone agrees that under the Constitution, slavery in the States is beyond the control of any authority except the States themselves where it exists. Can we not hope that the long struggle over this topic is coming to an end, and that the regional divisions it has created, which were so feared by the Founding Father, will soon disappear? It will be a great relief for the country when the public focus shifts from this issue to more urgent and practical matters. Throughout this ongoing struggle, which has seen little pause for over twenty years, while it has benefited no one, it has caused significant harm to the master, the slave, and the entire country. It has divided and alienated the people of the neighboring States and has even seriously threatened the very existence of the Union. The danger has not completely disappeared. In our system, there is a remedy for all political issues in the common sense and sober judgment of the people. Time is a great healer. Political topics that stirred up and frustrated the public just a few years ago have faded away and are now nearly forgotten. However, the issue of domestic slavery is much more serious than any mere political question because if the agitation continues, it could ultimately threaten the safety of many of our fellow citizens where the institution exists. In that case, no form of government, no matter how admirable or beneficial, can make up for the loss of peace and security at home. Therefore, let every person who values the Union do their best to put an end to this agitation, which, since the recent actions of Congress, has no legitimate purpose.

It is an evil omen of the times that men have undertaken to calculate the mere material value of the Union. Reasoned estimates have been presented of the pecuniary profits and local advantages which would result to different States and sections from its dissolution and of the comparative injuries which such an event would inflict on other States and sections. Even descending to this low and narrow view of the mighty question, all such calculations are at fault. The bare reference to a single consideration will be conclusive on this point. We at present enjoy a free trade throughout our extensive and expanding country such as the world has never witnessed. This trade is conducted on railroads and canals, on noble rivers and arms of the sea, which bind together the North and the South, the East and the West, of our Confederacy. Annihilate this trade, arrest its free progress by the geographical lines of jealous and hostile States, and you destroy the prosperity and onward march of the whole and every part and involve all in one common ruin. But such considerations, important as they are in themselves, sink into insignificance when we reflect on the terrific evils which would result from disunion to every portion of the Confederacy—to the North, not more than to the South, to the East not more than to the West. These I shall not attempt to portray, because I feel an humble confidence that the kind Providence which inspired our fathers with wisdom to frame the most perfect form of government and union ever devised by man will not suffer it to perish until it shall have been peacefully instrumental by its example in the extension of civil and religious liberty throughout the world.

It's a troubling sign of our times that people have begun to assess the material worth of the Union. Calculated estimates have been made regarding the financial gains and local benefits that different States and regions would experience from its breakup, as well as the relative harm such an event would cause to others. Even if we stoop to this narrow and reductive perspective on this monumental issue, all these calculations miss the mark. Just considering one factor is enough to prove this point. Right now, we enjoy a level of free trade across our vast and growing country that the world has never seen before. This trade happens on railroads and canals, on majestic rivers and coastal waters, connecting the North and the South, the East and the West of our Union. If we destroy this trade and halt its free movement by drawing geographical boundaries of distrust and hostility, we obliterate the prosperity and progress of the whole, affecting every part and leading us all to shared ruin. However, while these factors are important, they pale in comparison when we think about the tremendous suffering that would arise from disunion for every part of the Union—North as much as South, East as much as West. I won’t try to describe those consequences, as I have a humble confidence that the kind Providence that guided our founders to create the most perfect form of government and union ever conceived will not let it disappear until it has served as a peaceful example in the promotion of civil and religious liberty throughout the world.

Next in importance to the maintenance of the Constitution and the Union is the duty of preserving the Government free from the taint or even the suspicion of corruption. Public virtue is the vital spirit of republics, and history proves that when this has decayed and the love of money has usurped its place, although the forms of free government may remain for a season, the substance has departed forever.

Next in importance to upholding the Constitution and the Union is the responsibility of keeping the Government free from any hint or suspicion of corruption. Public virtue is the essential spirit of republics, and history shows that when this decays and the love of money takes over, even if the appearances of a free government remain for a while, its true essence is lost forever.

Our present financial condition is without a parallel in history. No nation has ever before been embarrassed from too large a surplus in its treasury. This almost necessarily gives birth to extravagant legislation. It produces wild schemes of expenditure and begets a race of speculators and jobbers, whose ingenuity is exerted in contriving and promoting expedients to obtain public money. The purity of official agents, whether rightfully or wrongfully, is suspected, and the character of the government suffers in the estimation of the people. This is in itself a very great evil.

Our current financial situation is unprecedented in history. No nation has ever faced embarrassment from having too much money in its treasury. This inevitably leads to extravagant laws and creates reckless spending plans, resulting in a group of speculators and profiteers who get creative in finding ways to access public funds. Whether justified or not, the integrity of public officials is questioned, and the reputation of the government suffers in the eyes of the people. This is, in itself, a significant problem.

The natural mode of relief from this embarrassment is to appropriate the surplus in the Treasury to great national objects for which a clear warrant can be found in the Constitution. Among these I might mention the extinguishment of the public debt, a reasonable increase of the Navy, which is at present inadequate to the protection of our vast tonnage afloat, now greater than that of any other nation, as well as to the defense of our extended seacoast.

The natural way to handle this embarrassment is to use the surplus in the Treasury for important national projects that are clearly justified by the Constitution. For example, we could pay off the public debt, reasonably increase the Navy, which is currently insufficient to protect our large shipping fleet—now the biggest in the world—and defend our long coastline.

It is beyond all question the true principle that no more revenue ought to be collected from the people than the amount necessary to defray the expenses of a wise, economical, and efficient administration of the Government. To reach this point it was necessary to resort to a modification of the tariff, and this has, I trust, been accomplished in such a manner as to do as little injury as may have been practicable to our domestic manufactures, especially those necessary for the defense of the country. Any discrimination against a particular branch for the purpose of benefiting favored corporations, individuals, or interests would have been unjust to the rest of the community and inconsistent with that spirit of fairness and equality which ought to govern in the adjustment of a revenue tariff.

It's clear that the basic principle is that we shouldn't collect more money from people than what's needed to cover the costs of a smart, efficient, and well-run government. To achieve this, we needed to make changes to the tariff, and I hope we've done this in a way that minimizes any harm to our domestic industries, especially those essential for the country's defense. Any favoritism towards a specific sector to benefit certain corporations, individuals, or interests would be unfair to everyone else and would go against the fairness and equality that should guide how we set up a revenue tariff.

But the squandering of the public money sinks into comparative insignificance as a temptation to corruption when compared with the squandering of the public lands.

But wasting public money pales in comparison to the temptation of corruption when you look at the wasting of public lands.

No nation in the tide of time has ever been blessed with so rich and noble an inheritance as we enjoy in the public lands. In administering this important trust, whilst it may be wise to grant portions of them for the improvement of the remainder, yet we should never forget that it is our cardinal policy to reserve these lands, as much as may be, for actual settlers, and this at moderate prices. We shall thus not only best promote the prosperity of the new States and Territories, by furnishing them a hardy and independent race of honest and industrious citizens, but shall secure homes for our children and our children's children, as well as for those exiles from foreign shores who may seek in this country to improve their condition and to enjoy the blessings of civil and religious liberty. Such emigrants have done much to promote the growth and prosperity of the country. They have proved faithful both in peace and in war. After becoming citizens they are entitled, under the Constitution and laws, to be placed on a perfect equality with native-born citizens, and in this character they should ever be kindly recognized.

No nation in history has ever been blessed with such a rich and noble inheritance as we have in our public lands. In managing this important trust, while it might make sense to allocate parts of these lands to improve the rest, we must remember that our primary goal is to reserve as much of these lands as possible for actual settlers, and to do so at reasonable prices. This approach will not only promote the prosperity of new States and Territories by providing them with a strong and independent population of honest and hardworking citizens, but it will also secure homes for our children and our grandchildren, as well as for those immigrants from abroad who come here seeking to improve their lives and enjoy the blessings of civil and religious freedom. These immigrants have significantly contributed to the growth and prosperity of our country. They have shown loyalty in both peace and war. Once they become citizens, they are entitled under the Constitution and laws to be treated as equals to native-born citizens, and in this capacity, they should always be treated with kindness.

The Federal Constitution is a grant from the States to Congress of certain specific powers, and the question whether this grant should be liberally or strictly construed has more or less divided political parties from the beginning. Without entering into the argument, I desire to state at the commencement of my Administration that long experience and observation have convinced me that a strict construction of the powers of the Government is the only true, as well as the only safe, theory of the Constitution. Whenever in our past history doubtful powers have been exercised by Congress, these have never failed to produce injurious and unhappy consequences. Many such instances might be adduced if this were the proper occasion. Neither is it necessary for the public service to strain the language of the Constitution, because all the great and useful powers required for a successful administration of the Government, both in peace and in war, have been granted, either in express terms or by the plainest implication.

The Federal Constitution is a permission from the States to Congress for specific powers, and whether this permission should be interpreted loosely or strictly has largely divided political parties from the start. Without getting into the debate, I want to make it clear at the beginning of my Administration that my long experience and observations lead me to believe that a strict interpretation of the Government's powers is both the only correct and the only safe approach to the Constitution. Whenever Congress has exercised questionable powers in our history, it has always led to harmful and unfortunate results. There are many examples of this if this were the right time to discuss them. It's also not necessary for the public good to stretch the language of the Constitution, as all the major and useful powers needed for effectively running the Government, both in times of peace and war, have been granted, either explicitly or by clear implication.

Whilst deeply convinced of these truths, I yet consider it clear that under the war-making power Congress may appropriate money toward the construction of a military road when this is absolutely necessary for the defense of any State or Territory of the Union against foreign invasion. Under the Constitution Congress has power "to declare war," "to raise and support armies," "to provide and maintain a navy," and to call forth the militia to "repel invasions." Thus endowed, in an ample manner, with the war-making power, the corresponding duty is required that "the United States shall protect each of them [the States] against invasion." Now, how is it possible to afford this protection to California and our Pacific possessions except by means of a military road through the Territories of the United States, over which men and munitions of war may be speedily transported from the Atlantic States to meet and to repel the invader? In the event of a war with a naval power much stronger than our own we should then have no other available access to the Pacific Coast, because such a power would instantly close the route across the isthmus of Central America. It is impossible to conceive that whilst the Constitution has expressly required Congress to defend all the States it should yet deny to them, by any fair construction, the only possible means by which one of these States can be defended. Besides, the Government, ever since its origin, has been in the constant practice of constructing military roads. It might also be wise to consider whether the love for the Union which now animates our fellow-citizens on the Pacific Coast may not be impaired by our neglect or refusal to provide for them, in their remote and isolated condition, the only means by which the power of the States on this side of the Rocky Mountains can reach them in sufficient time to "protect" them "against invasion." I forbear for the present from expressing an opinion as to the wisest and most economical mode in which the Government can lend its aid in accomplishing this great and necessary work. I believe that many of the difficulties in the way, which now appear formidable, will in a great degree vanish as soon as the nearest and best route shall have been satisfactorily ascertained.

While I strongly believe in these truths, I think it's clear that Congress, under its war-making powers, can allocate funds for building a military road when it's absolutely necessary for defending any State or Territory of the Union from foreign invasion. According to the Constitution, Congress has the authority "to declare war," "to raise and support armies," "to provide and maintain a navy," and to call up the militia to "repel invasions." With these powers, there comes the responsibility that "the United States shall protect each of them [the States] against invasion." So, how can we provide this protection to California and our Pacific territories without using a military road through the United States' Territories, enabling the quick transport of troops and military supplies from the Atlantic States to confront and drive back the invader? If we face a war with a naval power much stronger than ours, we won't have any other access to the Pacific Coast, as that power would immediately block the route across Central America. It’s hard to imagine that while the Constitution explicitly obligates Congress to defend all States, it simultaneously denies them, through any reasonable interpretation, the only means to do so. Moreover, since the inception of this Government, there has been a consistent practice of building military roads. It may also be wise to consider whether the dedication to the Union that currently inspires our fellow citizens on the Pacific Coast could be diminished by our neglect or refusal to provide them, in their remote and isolated situation, with the only means to connect with the States on this side of the Rocky Mountains in time to "protect" them "against invasion." For now, I will refrain from giving my opinion on the best and most cost-effective way the Government can assist in achieving this important and necessary project. I believe that many of the challenges that seem daunting now will largely disappear once the best and nearest route has been properly determined.

It may be proper that on this occasion I should make some brief remarks in regard to our rights and duties as a member of the great family of nations. In our intercourse with them there are some plain principles, approved by our own experience, from which we should never depart. We ought to cultivate peace, commerce, and friendship with all nations, and this not merely as the best means of promoting our own material interests, but in a spirit of Christian benevolence toward our fellow-men, wherever their lot may be cast. Our diplomacy should be direct and frank, neither seeking to obtain more nor accepting less than is our due. We ought to cherish a sacred regard for the independence of all nations, and never attempt to interfere in the domestic concerns of any unless this shall be imperatively required by the great law of self-preservation. To avoid entangling alliances has been a maxim of our policy ever since the days of Washington, and its wisdom's no one will attempt to dispute. In short, we ought to do justice in a kindly spirit to all nations and require justice from them in return.

It seems appropriate for me to say a few words about our rights and responsibilities as part of the global community. In our interactions with other nations, there are clear principles, based on our own experiences, that we should always adhere to. We should promote peace, trade, and friendship with all countries, not just to advance our own interests, but out of genuine goodwill towards our fellow human beings, no matter where they are. Our diplomacy should be honest and straightforward, neither asking for more than we deserve nor settling for less. We should respect the independence of all nations and only get involved in their internal affairs if absolutely necessary for self-preservation. Avoiding complicated alliances has been a core part of our policy since the days of Washington, and no one can question its wisdom. In short, we should treat all nations with fairness and kindness, and expect the same in return.

It is our glory that whilst other nations have extended their dominions by the sword we have never acquired any territory except by fair purchase or, as in the case of Texas, by the voluntary determination of a brave, kindred, and independent people to blend their destinies with our own. Even our acquisitions from Mexico form no exception. Unwilling to take advantage of the fortune of war against a sister republic, we purchased these possessions under the treaty of peace for a sum which was considered at the time a fair equivalent. Our past history forbids that we shall in the future acquire territory unless this be sanctioned by the laws of justice and honor. Acting on this principle, no nation will have a right to interfere or to complain if in the progress of events we shall still further extend our possessions. Hitherto in all our acquisitions the people, under the protection of the American flag, have enjoyed civil and religious liberty, as well as equal and just laws, and have been contented, prosperous, and happy. Their trade with the rest of the world has rapidly increased, and thus every commercial nation has shared largely in their successful progress.

It’s our pride that while other nations have expanded their territories through war, we have only acquired land through fair purchase or, as in the case of Texas, through the voluntary choice of a brave, like-minded, and independent people to join us. Even our gains from Mexico are no exception. Not wanting to take advantage of the misfortunes of war against a fellow republic, we bought those lands under the peace treaty for what was then considered a fair price. Our history requires that we only acquire territory in ways that align with justice and honor. Following this principle, no nation should have the right to interfere or complain if, as events unfold, we continue to expand our territories. So far, in all our acquisitions, the people under the protection of the American flag have enjoyed civil and religious liberty, along with fair and just laws, and have been satisfied, thriving, and happy. Their trade with the rest of the world has grown rapidly, allowing every commercial nation to benefit significantly from their progress.

I shall now proceed to take the oath prescribed by the Constitution, whilst humbly invoking the blessing of Divine Providence on this great people.

I will now take the oath required by the Constitution, while respectfully asking for the blessing of Divine Providence on this great nation.






ABRAHAM LINCOLN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1861

[Transcriber's note: The national upheaval of secession was a grim reality at Abraham Lincoln's inauguration. Jefferson Davis had been inaugurated as the President of the Confederacy two weeks earlier. The former Illinois Congressman had arrived in Washington by a secret route to avoid danger, and his movements were guarded by General Winfield Scott's soldiers. Ignoring advice to the contrary, the President-elect rode with President Buchanan in an open carriage to the Capitol, where he took the oath of office on the East Portico. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the executive oath for the seventh time. The Capitol itself was sheathed in scaffolding because the copper and wood "Bulfinch" dome was being replaced with a cast iron dome designed by Thomas U. Walter.]

[Transcriber's note: The national crisis of secession was a harsh reality at Abraham Lincoln's inauguration. Two weeks prior, Jefferson Davis was inaugurated as the President of the Confederacy. The former Illinois Congressman had traveled to Washington using a secret route to avoid danger, and his movements were protected by soldiers under General Winfield Scott. Ignoring warnings to the contrary, the President-elect rode with President Buchanan in an open carriage to the Capitol, where he took the oath of office on the East Portico. Chief Justice Roger Taney administered the executive oath for the seventh time. The Capitol itself was covered in scaffolding because the copper and wood "Bulfinch" dome was being replaced with a cast iron dome designed by Thomas U. Walter.]


Fellow-Citizens of the United States:

Fellow citizens of the U.S.:

In compliance with a custom as old as the Government itself, I appear before you to address you briefly and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States to be taken by the President "before he enters on the execution of this office."

In keeping with a tradition as old as the Government itself, I'm here to speak briefly and to take the oath required by the Constitution of the United States to be taken by the President "before he enters on the execution of this office."

I do not consider it necessary at present for me to discuss those matters of administration about which there is no special anxiety or excitement.

I don't think it's necessary for me to talk about administrative issues right now since there's no particular concern or excitement about them.

Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of a Republican Administration their property and their peace and personal security are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that—

Apprehension seems to be present among the people of the Southern States that with the establishment of a Republican Administration, their property, peace, and personal security will be threatened. There has never been any valid reason for such concern. In fact, there has always been ample evidence to the contrary, accessible for their review. This is found in almost all the published speeches of the person speaking to you now. I quote from one of those speeches when I say that—

I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.

I have no intention, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no legal right to do so, and I have no desire to do so.

Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this and many similar declarations and had never recanted them; and more than this, they placed in the platform for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves and to me, the clear and emphatic resolution which I now read:

Those who nominated and elected me did so fully aware that I had made this and many similar statements and had never taken them back; furthermore, they included in the platform for my approval, and as a commitment for both themselves and me, the clear and strong resolution that I am now reading:

Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes.

Resolved, That the protection of the rights of the States, especially each State's right to manage and regulate its own domestic affairs as it sees fit, is vital to the balance of power that our political system relies on for its success and longevity; and we condemn any unlawful armed invasion of the land of any State or Territory, regardless of the reason given, as one of the most serious crimes.

I now reiterate these sentiments, and in doing so I only press upon the public attention the most conclusive evidence of which the case is susceptible that the property, peace, and security of no section are to be in any wise endangered by the now incoming Administration. I add, too, that all the protection which, consistently with the Constitution and the laws, can be given will be cheerfully given to all the States when lawfully demanded, for whatever cause—as cheerfully to one section as to another.

I want to emphasize these feelings again, and by doing so, I'm drawing the public's attention to the strongest evidence available that the property, peace, and safety of any part of the country will not be threatened by the new Administration. I also want to add that all the support that can be provided in accordance with the Constitution and the laws will be gladly given to all the States when requested, for any reason—just as willingly to one part as to another.

There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions:

There is a lot of debate about the extradition of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I'm about to read is just as clearly stated in the Constitution as any of its other provisions:

No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.

No person who is required to work or provide services in one state and escapes to another state shall be freed from that obligation because of any laws or regulations in the new state. Instead, they will be returned to the person entitled to their service or labor upon request.

It is scarcely questioned that this provision was intended by those who made it for the reclaiming of what we call fugitive slaves; and the intention of the lawgiver is the law. All members of Congress swear their support to the whole Constitution—to this provision as much as to any other. To the proposition, then, that slaves whose cases come within the terms of this clause "shall be delivered up" their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they would make the effort in good temper, could they not with nearly equal unanimity frame and pass a law by means of which to keep good that unanimous oath?

It is hardly questioned that this provision was created by those who intended it for the recovery of what we refer to as fugitive slaves; and the lawmaker's intent is the law. All members of Congress swear to support the entire Constitution—this provision just as much as any other. Therefore, when it comes to the idea that slaves whose situations fall under this clause "shall be delivered up," their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they approached this with a positive attitude, could they not almost unanimously create and pass a law to uphold that unanimous oath?

There is some difference of opinion whether this clause should be enforced by national or by State authority, but surely that difference is not a very material one. If the slave is to be surrendered, it can be of but little consequence to him or to others by which authority it is done. And should anyone in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?

There is some disagreement about whether this clause should be enforced by national or state authority, but that difference is not very significant. If the slave is to be surrendered, it hardly matters to him or to anyone else which authority is responsible for it. And should anyone be okay with their oath going unfulfilled over a trivial dispute about how it should be fulfilled?

Again: In any law upon this subject ought not all the safeguards of liberty known in civilized and humane jurisprudence to be introduced, so that a free man be not in any case surrendered as a slave? And might it not be well at the same time to provide by law for the enforcement of that clause in the Constitution which guarantees that "the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States"?

Again: In any law on this subject, shouldn't all the freedoms known in civilized and humane legal systems be included, so that a free person is never treated like a slave? And wouldn’t it be a good idea to also ensure by law that the clause in the Constitution guaranteeing that "the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States" is enforced?

I take the official oath to-day with no mental reservations and with no purpose to construe the Constitution or laws by any hypercritical rules; and while I do not choose now to specify particular acts of Congress as proper to be enforced, I do suggest that it will be much safer for all, both in official and private stations, to conform to and abide by all those acts which stand unrepealed than to violate any of them trusting to find impunity in having them held to be unconstitutional.

I’m taking the official oath today with no doubts and no intention to interpret the Constitution or laws with overly critical rules. While I won’t specify any particular acts of Congress that should be enforced, I suggest it’s safer for everyone, both in public and private roles, to follow and adhere to all those acts that haven’t been repealed rather than violate any, thinking they might be considered unconstitutional without consequences.

It is seventy-two years since the first inauguration of a President under our National Constitution. During that period fifteen different and greatly distinguished citizens have in succession administered the executive branch of the Government. They have conducted it through many perils, and generally with great success. Yet, with all this scope of precedent, I now enter upon the same task for the brief constitutional term of four years under great and peculiar difficulty. A disruption of the Federal Union, heretofore only menaced, is now formidably attempted.

It has been seventy-two years since the first President was inaugurated under our National Constitution. In that time, fifteen different and highly respected individuals have served as the head of the executive branch of the Government. They have navigated many challenges and have usually succeeded. However, despite all this history to guide me, I am now taking on this role for a short constitutional term of four years under significant and unique challenges. A breakup of the Federal Union, which was previously only a threat, is now being seriously attempted.

I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments. It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself.

I believe that when considering universal law and the Constitution, the Union of these States is meant to last forever. This idea of eternity is suggested, if not directly stated, in the fundamental laws of all national governments. It’s safe to say that no legitimate government has ever included a clause in its foundational law allowing for its own end. If we continue to uphold all the specific provisions of our National Constitution, the Union will last indefinitely, as it cannot be abolished except through actions not outlined in the document itself.

Again: If the United States be not a government proper, but an association of States in the nature of contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One party to a contract may violate it—break it, so to speak—but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?

Again: If the United States is not a proper government, but just an association of States based on a contract, can it be peacefully undone by less than all the parties involved? One party in a contract can violate it—break it, so to speak—but doesn’t it take everyone to legally cancel it?

Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that in legal contemplation the Union is perpetual confirmed by the history of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And finally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was "to form a more perfect Union."

Building on these basic ideas, we see that the notion of the Union being perpetual is supported by the history of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was actually established by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was further developed and continued with the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was also reinforced, with a commitment from all thirteen States at the time to make it perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. Finally, in 1787, one of the stated purposes for creating and implementing the Constitution was "to form a more perfect Union."

But if destruction of the Union by one or by a part only of the States be lawfully possible, the Union is less perfect than before the Constitution, having lost the vital element of perpetuity.

But if it's legally possible for one state or just part of the states to destroy the Union, then the Union is less perfect than it was before the Constitution, having lost the essential quality of lasting forever.

It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void, and that acts of violence within any State or States against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances.

It follows from these views that no state can legally leave the Union on its own; any resolutions or ordinances to that effect are legally invalid, and acts of violence within any state against the authority of the United States are considered insurrection or rebellion, depending on the circumstances.

I therefore consider that in view of the Constitution and the laws the Union is unbroken, and to the extent of my ability, I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the States. Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part, and I shall perform it so far as practicable unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means or in some authoritative manner direct the contrary. I trust this will not be regarded as a menace, but only as the declared purpose of the Union that it will constitutionally defend and maintain itself.

I believe that, according to the Constitution and the laws, the Union remains intact, and as much as I can, I will ensure, as the Constitution specifically requires me to do, that the laws of the Union are enforced in all the States. I see this as a straightforward duty, and I will carry it out as much as possible unless the American people, my rightful masters, choose to withhold the necessary resources or clearly instruct otherwise. I hope this is seen not as a threat, but simply as the stated intention of the Union to responsibly uphold and protect itself.

In doing this there needs to be no bloodshed or violence, and there shall be none unless it be forced upon the national authority. The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the Government and to collect the duties and imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere. Where hostility to the United States in any interior locality shall be so great and universal as to prevent competent resident citizens from holding the Federal offices, there will be no attempt to force obnoxious strangers among the people for that object. While the strict legal right may exist in the Government to enforce the exercise of these offices, the attempt to do so would be so irritating and so nearly impracticable withal that I deem it better to forego for the time the uses of such offices.

In this process, there should be no bloodshed or violence, and there won’t be unless the national authority is forced into it. The power entrusted to me will be used to hold, occupy, and manage the property and locations that belong to the Government and to collect duties and taxes; but aside from what may be necessary for these purposes, there will be no invasion or use of force against the people anywhere. If hostility to the United States is so strong and widespread in any area that it prevents capable local residents from taking on Federal positions, there will be no effort to impose unwanted outsiders on the community for that purpose. While the Government may have a strict legal right to enforce these positions, trying to do so would be so frustrating and nearly impossible that I believe it’s better to temporarily set aside the use of these offices.

The mails, unless repelled, will continue to be furnished in all parts of the Union. So far as possible the people everywhere shall have that sense of perfect security which is most favorable to calm thought and reflection. The course here indicated will be followed unless current events and experience shall show a modification or change to be proper, and in every case and exigency my best discretion will be exercised, according to circumstances actually existing and with a view and a hope of a peaceful solution of the national troubles and the restoration of fraternal sympathies and affections.

The mail, unless stopped, will continue to be delivered across the entire country. As much as possible, people everywhere should feel a perfect sense of security, which is best for calm thinking and reflection. The plan outlined here will be followed unless current events and experiences suggest that a change is necessary. In every situation, I will use my best judgment based on the actual circumstances, with the aim and hope of peacefully resolving the nation’s issues and restoring feelings of brotherhood and affection.

That there are persons in one section or another who seek to destroy the Union at all events and are glad of any pretext to do it I will neither affirm nor deny; but if there be such, I need address no word to them. To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?

That there are people in one group or another who want to tear down the Union at any cost and are happy to find any reason to do so, I won't say yes or no; but if there are such people, I don’t need to say anything to them. To those who truly love the Union, may I not have a word with you?

Before entering upon so grave a matter as the destruction of our national fabric, with all its benefits, its memories, and its hopes, would it not be wise to ascertain precisely why we do it? Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence? Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from, will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?

Before taking such a serious step as destroying our national structure, with all its benefits, memories, and hopes, wouldn’t it be wise to figure out exactly why we’re doing it? Will you take such a drastic action while there’s any chance that some of the problems you’re running from might not actually exist? Will you, knowing that the certain problems you’re heading towards are greater than all the real issues you’re escaping from, risk making such a terrible mistake?

All profess to be content in the Union if all constitutional rights can be maintained. Is it true, then, that any right plainly written in the Constitution has been denied? I think not. Happily, the human mind is so constituted that no party can reach to the audacity of doing this. Think, if you can, of a single instance in which a plainly written provision of the Constitution has ever been denied. If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might in a moral point of view justify revolution; certainly would if such right were a vital one. But such is not our case. All the vital rights of minorities and of individuals are so plainly assured to them by affirmations and negations, guaranties and prohibitions, in the Constitution that controversies never arise concerning them. But no organic law can ever be framed with a provision specifically applicable to every question which may occur in practical administration. No foresight can anticipate nor any document of reasonable length contain express provisions for all possible questions. Shall fugitives from labor be surrendered by national or by State authority? The Constitution does not expressly say. May Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories? The Constitution does not expressly say. Must Congress protect slavery in the Territories? The Constitution does not expressly say.

Everyone claims to be satisfied in the Union as long as all constitutional rights are upheld. So, is it really true that any right clearly stated in the Constitution has been denied? I don’t think so. Fortunately, human nature is such that no group would have the audacity to do this. Try to think of a single instance where a clearly written provision of the Constitution has ever been denied. If a majority were to use sheer numbers to take away a clearly written constitutional right from a minority, it could morally justify a revolution; it certainly would if that right were vital. But that is not our situation. All essential rights of minorities and individuals are clearly guaranteed by affirmations and negations, protections and prohibitions in the Constitution, so disputes about them rarely occur. However, no law can ever be created with a provision that addresses every question that might arise in practical governance. No amount of foresight can predict nor can any reasonably sized document include explicit provisions for every possible issue. Should escaped laborers be handed over by national or state authority? The Constitution doesn’t explicitly say. Can Congress ban slavery in the Territories? The Constitution doesn’t explicitly say. Must Congress protect slavery in the Territories? The Constitution doesn’t explicitly say.

From questions of this class spring all our constitutional controversies, and we divide upon them into majorities and minorities. If the minority will not acquiesce, the majority must, or the Government must cease. There is no other alternative, for continuing the Government is acquiescence on one side or the other. If a minority in such case will secede rather than acquiesce, they make a precedent which in turn will divide and ruin them, for a minority of their own will secede from them whenever a majority refuses to be controlled by such minority. For instance, why may not any portion of a new confederacy a year or two hence arbitrarily secede again, precisely as portions of the present Union now claim to secede from it? All who cherish disunion sentiments are now being educated to the exact temper of doing this.

From these kinds of questions come all our constitutional debates, and we end up splitting into majorities and minorities. If the minority won't go along with the majority, then the majority must, or the Government must stop functioning. There's no other choice because keeping the Government going means either side has to accept it. If a minority decides to break away instead of going along, they're setting a precedent that will ultimately split and destroy them, as another minority will break away from them whenever a majority refuses to be controlled by that minority. For example, why can't any part of a new confederacy a year or two from now just decide to break away again, just like some parts of the current Union are trying to do? Everyone who supports disunion ideas is being trained to exactly this mindset.

Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new union as to produce harmony only and prevent renewed secession?

Is there such a perfect alignment of interests among the States to form a new union that it will create harmony and stop secession from happening again?

Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible. The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.

Clearly, the main idea behind secession is the core of anarchy. A majority kept in check by constitutional limitations, which can easily change with shifts in public opinion and feelings, is the only true authority of a free society. Anyone who rejects this principle inevitably resorts to either anarchy or tyranny. Absolute agreement is unattainable. A system where a minority holds power permanently is completely unacceptable; therefore, if we disregard the majority principle, all that's left is some form of anarchy or tyranny.

I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government. And while it is obviously possible that such decision may be erroneous in any given case, still the evil effect following it, being limited to that particular case, with the chance that it may be overruled and never become a precedent for other cases, can better be borne than could the evils of a different practice. At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal. Nor is there in this view any assault upon the court or the judges. It is a duty from which they may not shrink to decide cases properly brought before them, and it is no fault of theirs if others seek to turn their decisions to political purposes.

I acknowledge that some believe constitutional issues should be decided by the Supreme Court, and I agree that those decisions must be binding for the parties involved in any litigation regarding that case. They also deserve a great deal of respect and consideration in all similar situations from all other branches of the government. While it’s certainly possible for such a decision to be incorrect in a specific instance, the negative impact would be limited only to that case, with a chance it could be overturned and not set a precedent for future cases. This is more manageable than the issues that would arise from a different approach. At the same time, a thoughtful citizen must admit that if the government’s approach to crucial issues impacting the entire population is permanently determined by Supreme Court decisions the moment they’re made in everyday lawsuits, the public would no longer be in control of their government to that extent, effectively handing over power to that respected court. This perspective does not attack the court or the judges. They have the responsibility to make decisions on cases presented to them and it’s not their fault if others attempt to use their rulings for political purposes.

One section of our country believes slavery is right and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute. The fugitive-slave clause of the Constitution and the law for the suppression of the foreign slave trade are each as well enforced, perhaps, as any law can ever be in a community where the moral sense of the people imperfectly supports the law itself. The great body of the people abide by the dry legal obligation in both cases, and a few break over in each. This, I think, can not be perfectly cured, and it would be worse in both cases after the separation of the sections than before. The foreign slave trade, now imperfectly suppressed, would be ultimately revived without restriction in one section, while fugitive slaves, now only partially surrendered, would not be surrendered at all by the other.

One part of our country thinks slavery is right and should be expanded, while the other thinks it’s wrong and shouldn’t be expanded. This is the only significant disagreement. The fugitive-slave clause of the Constitution and the law against the foreign slave trade are both enforced as well as any law can be in a community where the moral views of the people don’t fully back the law. Most people follow the strict legal requirements in both situations, and a few violate them in each case. I believe this can’t be completely fixed, and it would actually get worse in both situations after the regions split apart than it is now. The foreign slave trade, which is currently only partially suppressed, would eventually be unrestricted in one region, while fugitive slaves, who are now only partially returned, wouldn’t be returned at all by the other.

Physically speaking, we can not separate. We can not remove our respective sections from each other nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of our country can not do this. They can not but remain face to face, and intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before? Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends? Suppose you go to war, you can not fight always; and when, after much loss on both sides and no gain on either, you cease fighting, the identical old questions, as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you.

Physically, we can't separate. We can't just take our parts away from each other or build an unbreakable wall between us. A husband and wife might get divorced and go their separate ways, but the different parts of our country can't do that. They have to stay face to face, and interactions, whether friendly or hostile, will continue between them. So, is it possible to make those interactions more beneficial or more satisfying after separation than they were before? Can strangers create agreements more easily than friends can make laws? Can agreements be enforced more reliably between strangers than laws can among friends? If you go to war, you can't keep fighting forever; and when, after much loss on both sides and no gain for either, you stop fighting, the same old questions about how to interact come back up again.

This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it. I can not be ignorant of the fact that many worthy and patriotic citizens are desirous of having the National Constitution amended. While I make no recommendation of amendments, I fully recognize the rightful authority of the people over the whole subject, to be exercised in either of the modes prescribed in the instrument itself; and I should, under existing circumstances, favor rather than oppose a fair opportunity being afforded the people to act upon it. I will venture to add that to me the convention mode seems preferable, in that it allows amendments to originate with the people themselves, instead of only permitting them to take or reject propositions originated by others, not especially chosen for the purpose, and which might not be precisely such as they would wish to either accept or refuse. I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. To avoid misconstruction of what I have said, I depart from my purpose not to speak of particular amendments so far as to say that, holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.

This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who live here. Whenever they get tired of the current government, they can use their constitutional right to change it or their revolutionary right to break it down or overthrow it. I can’t ignore the fact that many dedicated and patriotic citizens want to see the National Constitution amended. While I’m not suggesting any specific amendments, I fully acknowledge the people’s authority over the entire issue, to be exercised in the ways outlined in the document itself. Given the current situation, I would favor rather than oppose giving the people a fair chance to act on it. I should add that to me, the convention method seems better because it allows amendments to come from the people themselves instead of just letting them accept or reject ideas from others who might not have been chosen specifically for this purpose and which might not be exactly what they would want to accept or reject. I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which I have not seen—has passed Congress, stating that the Federal Government will never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including those related to people held in service. To avoid any misunderstanding of what I’ve said, I’ll stray a bit from my plan not to discuss specific amendments just to say that, considering such a provision to be implied constitutional law now, I wouldn’t mind it being made explicit and irreversible.

The Chief Magistrate derives all his authority from the people, and they have referred none upon him to fix terms for the separation of the States. The people themselves can do this if also they choose, but the Executive as such has nothing to do with it. His duty is to administer the present Government as it came to his hands and to transmit it unimpaired by him to his successor.

The Chief Magistrate gets all his power from the people, and they haven't given him any authority to determine how the States should separate. The people themselves can handle that if they decide to, but the Executive has no role in it. His job is to manage the current Government as it was given to him and pass it on unchanged to his successor.

Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people? Is there any better or equal hope in the world? In our present differences, is either party without faith of being in the right? If the Almighty Ruler of Nations, with His eternal truth and justice, be on your side of the North, or on yours of the South, that truth and that justice will surely prevail by the judgment of this great tribunal of the American people.

Why shouldn't people have confidence in the ultimate justice of the public? Is there any better or equal hope out there? In our current disagreements, is either side completely sure they are right? If the Almighty Ruler of Nations, with His eternal truth and justice, stands with you in the North, or with you in the South, that truth and justice will definitely win out in the eyes of the American people.

By the frame of the Government under which we live this same people have wisely given their public servants but little power for mischief, and have with equal wisdom provided for the return of that little to their own hands at very short intervals. While the people retain their virtue and vigilance no Administration by any extreme of wickedness or folly can very seriously injure the Government in the short space of four years.

By the structure of the Government we live under, the people have wisely granted their public servants limited power to cause harm, and have equally wisely ensured that this limited power returns to them at short intervals. As long as the people maintain their integrity and watchfulness, no Administration, no matter how malicious or foolish, can seriously damage the Government in just four years.

My countrymen, one and all, think calmly and well upon this whole subject. Nothing valuable can be lost by taking time. If there be an object to hurry any of you in hot haste to a step which you would never take deliberately, that object will be frustrated by taking time; but no good object can be frustrated by it. Such of you as are now dissatisfied still have the old Constitution unimpaired, and, on the sensitive point, the laws of your own framing under it; while the new Administration will have no immediate power, if it would, to change either. If it were admitted that you who are dissatisfied hold the right side in the dispute, there still is no single good reason for precipitate action. Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity, and a firm reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored land are still competent to adjust in the best way all our present difficulty.

My fellow countrymen, take a moment to think thoughtfully about this entire issue. Nothing valuable will be lost by taking your time. If there’s something driving any of you to rush into a decision you wouldn’t make with careful consideration, that pressure will be overcome by taking your time; but no worthwhile goal can be hindered by it. Those of you who are unhappy still have the existing Constitution intact, along with the laws you created under it; and the new Administration won't have any immediate power, even if it wanted to, to change either of those things. Even if it were agreed that those of you who are dissatisfied are on the right side of this argument, there is still no good reason for hasty action. Intelligence, patriotism, faith, and a strong trust in Him who has never abandoned this blessed land are still capable of resolving all of our current issues in the best way possible.

In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect, and defend it."

In your hands, my unhappy fellow citizens, and not mine, is the critical issue of civil war. The Government will not attack you. You can’t have a conflict unless you choose to be the aggressors. You have no divine obligation to destroy the Government, while I have a serious promise to "preserve, protect, and defend it."

I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

I really don’t want to end this. We aren't enemies; we're friends. We shouldn't be enemies. Even though our emotions may have beenstrained, they shouldn't break our bonds of affection. The deep connections we share, reaching from every battlefield and grave of our heroes to every living heart and home across this vast country, will once again amplify the unity we share when they're stirred, as they definitely will be, by the better sides of our nature.






ABRAHAM LINCOLN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1865

[Transcriber's note: Weeks of wet weather preceding Lincoln's second inauguration had caused Pennsylvania Avenue to become a sea of mud and standing water. Thousands of spectators stood in thick mud at the Capitol grounds to hear the President. As he stood on the East Portico to take the executive oath, the completed Capitol dome over the President's head was a physical reminder of the resolve of his Administration throughout the years of civil war. Chief Justice Salmon Chase administered the oath of office. In little more than a month, the President would be assassinated.]

[Transcriber's note: Weeks of rainy weather leading up to Lincoln's second inauguration had turned Pennsylvania Avenue into a muddy mess with puddles everywhere. Thousands of spectators stood in deep mud on the Capitol grounds to hear the President speak. As he stood on the East Portico to take the oath of office, the finished Capitol dome above him symbolized the determination of his Administration during the years of civil war. Chief Justice Salmon Chase administered the oath. In just over a month, the President would be assassinated.]


Fellow-Countrymen:

Fellow Citizens:

At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.

At this second time taking the oath of the Presidential office, there's less need for a long speech than there was at the first. Back then, it seemed appropriate to outline in detail the course to be taken. Now, after four years, during which public statements have been consistently required on every aspect of the major conflict that still captures the nation’s attention and energy, there isn’t much new to share. The progress of our military efforts, which is crucial for everything else, is as well known to the public as it is to me, and I hope it's reasonably satisfactory and encouraging for everyone. With high hopes for the future, I won't make any predictions about it.

On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.

Four years ago today, everyone was anxiously focused on the imminent civil war. Everyone feared it, and everyone tried to prevent it. While the inaugural address was being delivered here, completely focused on saving the Union without fighting, urgent agents in the city were trying to destroy it without conflict—trying to dissolve the Union and split its assets through negotiation. Both sides rejected war, but one side would rather go to war than let the nation continue to exist, while the other would accept war rather than let it die, and so the war happened.

One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether." With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

One-eighth of the entire population were enslaved people of color, not spread evenly across the country but concentrated in the southern region. These enslaved individuals represented a unique and powerful interest. Everyone recognized that this interest was somehow responsible for the war. The aim of the insurgents was to strengthen, prolong, and expand this interest, even at the cost of tearing the Union apart through war, while the Government claimed it only sought to limit its territorial expansion. Neither side expected the war to reach the size or duration it has already achieved. Neither anticipated that the reasons for the conflict might end with or even before the fighting itself concluded. Each side expected an easier victory and a result that was less fundamental and shocking. Both parties read the same Bible and prayed to the same God, invoking His help against each other. It might seem odd that anyone would dare to ask for a just God's assistance in earning their bread from the hard work of others, but let us not judge, lest we be judged ourselves. The prayers of both sides could not be fully answered. Neither side has received a complete response. The Almighty has His own plans. "Woe to the world because of offenses; for it must happen that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense comes." If we suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses that, in God's plan, must happen, but which, having persisted through His appointed time, He now aims to eliminate, and that He gives both the North and the South this terrible war as the consequence for the offense, can we see this as any deviation from the divine characteristics that believers attribute to a living God? We hope earnestly, and we pray fervently, that this awful scourge of war will pass quickly. Yet, if God intends for it to continue until all the wealth accumulated from the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unpaid labor is lost, and until every drop of blood drawn by the whip is paid for with blood drawn by the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, we must still say, "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether." With malice toward none, with kindness for all, and with determination to follow the right as God reveals it to us, let us keep working to finish our task, to heal the nation's wounds, to care for those who have endured the battle, and for their widows and orphans, and to do everything that will achieve and maintain a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.






ULYSSES S. GRANT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 1869

[Transcriber's note: General Grant was the first of many Civil War officers to become President of the United States. He refused to ride in the carriage to the Capitol with President Johnson, who then decided not to attend the ceremony. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Salmon Chase on the East Portico. The inaugural parade boasted eight full divisions of the Army—the largest contingent yet to march on such an occasion. That evening, a ball was held in the Treasury Building.]

[Transcriber's note: General Grant was the first of many Civil War officers to become President of the United States. He refused to ride in the carriage to the Capitol with President Johnson, who then decided not to attend the ceremony. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Salmon Chase on the East Portico. The inaugural parade featured eight full divisions of the Army—the largest group ever to march for such an occasion. That evening, a ball was held in the Treasury Building.]


Citizens of the United States:

U.S. citizens:

Your suffrages having elected me to the office of President of the United States, I have, in conformity to the Constitution of our country, taken the oath of office prescribed therein. I have taken this oath without mental reservation and with the determination to do to the best of my ability all that is required of me. The responsibilities of the position I feel, but accept them without fear. The office has come to me unsought; I commence its duties untrammeled. I bring to it a conscious desire and determination to fill it to the best of my ability to the satisfaction of the people.

Your votes have elected me as the President of the United States. In line with the Constitution of our country, I have taken the oath of office as required. I took this oath with no reservations and with the commitment to do my best at everything expected of me. I feel the weight of the responsibilities that come with this role, but I accept them without fear. This position has come to me without my seeking it; I start my duties free from any constraints. I approach this role with a clear desire and determination to fulfill it to the best of my ability and to the satisfaction of the people.

On all leading questions agitating the public mind I will always express my views to Congress and urge them according to my judgment, and when I think it advisable will exercise the constitutional privilege of interposing a veto to defeat measures which I oppose; but all laws will be faithfully executed, whether they meet my approval or not.

On all the major issues that concern the public, I will always share my thoughts with Congress and advocate for them based on my judgment. When I believe it's necessary, I will use my constitutional right to veto proposals I disagree with; however, all laws will be faithfully enforced, regardless of my personal opinions.

I shall on all subjects have a policy to recommend, but none to enforce against the will of the people. Laws are to govern all alike—those opposed as well as those who favor them. I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution.

I will have a policy to recommend on all topics, but none to impose against the will of the people. Laws are meant to apply to everyone—both those who oppose them and those who support them. I know of no better way to ensure the repeal of bad or unpopular laws than to enforce them strictly.

The country having just emerged from a great rebellion, many questions will come before it for settlement in the next four years which preceding Administrations have never had to deal with. In meeting these it is desirable that they should be approached calmly, without prejudice, hate, or sectional pride, remembering that the greatest good to the greatest number is the object to be attained.

The country has just come out of a major rebellion, and many issues will need to be resolved in the next four years that previous administrations have never faced. It’s important to address these issues calmly, without bias, hatred, or regional pride, keeping in mind that the goal is to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

This requires security of person, property, and free religious and political opinion in every part of our common country, without regard to local prejudice. All laws to secure these ends will receive my best efforts for their enforcement.

This requires the safety of individuals, property, and the freedom to express religious and political beliefs throughout our entire country, regardless of local biases. I will do my utmost to ensure that all laws aimed at achieving these goals are enforced.

A great debt has been contracted in securing to us and our posterity the Union. The payment of this, principal and interest, as well as the return to a specie basis as soon as it can be accomplished without material detriment to the debtor class or to the country at large, must be provided for. To protect the national honor, every dollar of Government indebtedness should be paid in gold, unless otherwise expressly stipulated in the contract. Let it be understood that no repudiator of one farthing of our public debt will be trusted in public place, and it will go far toward strengthening a credit which ought to be the best in the world, and will ultimately enable us to replace the debt with bonds bearing less interest than we now pay. To this should be added a faithful collection of the revenue, a strict accountability to the Treasury for every dollar collected, and the greatest practicable retrenchment in expenditure in every department of Government.

A significant debt has been incurred to secure the Union for us and future generations. We need to manage the repayment of this debt, both principal and interest, and work toward returning to a gold standard as soon as it's feasible without significantly harming the debtor class or the country as a whole. To maintain national honor, every dollar of government debt should be repaid in gold, unless the contract states otherwise. It should be clear that anyone who denies even a penny of our public debt will not be trusted in public office, which will help strengthen a credit that should be the best in the world and ultimately allow us to replace the debt with bonds that have lower interest rates than we currently pay. Additionally, we should ensure diligent collection of revenue, hold strict accountability to the Treasury for every dollar collected, and implement significant budget cuts in every government department.

When we compare the paying capacity of the country now, with the ten States in poverty from the effects of war, but soon to emerge, I trust, into greater prosperity than ever before, with its paying capacity twenty-five years ago, and calculate what it probably will be twenty-five years hence, who can doubt the feasibility of paying every dollar then with more ease than we now pay for useless luxuries? Why, it looks as though Providence had bestowed upon us a strong box in the precious metals locked up in the sterile mountains of the far West, and which we are now forging the key to unlock, to meet the very contingency that is now upon us.

When we compare the country's ability to pay now with the ten States that are struggling because of the effects of war, but will soon, I hope, emerge into greater prosperity than ever before, against its ability to pay twenty-five years ago, and estimate what it will likely be in another twenty-five years, who can doubt that paying off every dollar will be easier than how we currently spend on unnecessary luxuries? It seems like Providence has given us a treasure chest of precious metals locked away in the barren mountains of the far West, and we are now figuring out the key to unlock it, to address the very situation we are facing now.

Ultimately it may be necessary to insure the facilities to reach these riches and it may be necessary also that the General Government should give its aid to secure this access; but that should only be when a dollar of obligation to pay secures precisely the same sort of dollar to use now, and not before. Whilst the question of specie payments is in abeyance the prudent business man is careful about contracting debts payable in the distant future. The nation should follow the same rule. A prostrate commerce is to be rebuilt and all industries encouraged.

Ultimately, it might be necessary to ensure access to these resources, and the federal government may also need to help secure that access. However, this should only happen when a dollar owed is equivalent to the same kind of dollar we can use now, and not before. While the issue of gold and silver payments is on hold, a sensible business person is cautious about taking on debt that needs to be repaid far in the future. The nation should adopt the same approach. We need to rebuild a struggling economy and encourage all industries.

The young men of the country—those who from their age must be its rulers twenty-five years hence—have a peculiar interest in maintaining the national honor. A moment's reflection as to what will be our commanding influence among the nations of the earth in their day, if they are only true to themselves, should inspire them with national pride. All divisions—geographical, political, and religious—can join in this common sentiment. How the public debt is to be paid or specie payments resumed is not so important as that a plan should be adopted and acquiesced in. A united determination to do is worth more than divided counsels upon the method of doing. Legislation upon this subject may not be necessary now, or even advisable, but it will be when the civil law is more fully restored in all parts of the country and trade resumes its wonted channels.

The young men of the country—those who will likely be its leaders in twenty-five years—have a strong interest in preserving national honor. Just taking a moment to think about what our influence among the nations may be in their time, if they stay true to themselves, should fill them with national pride. All divisions—whether geographical, political, or religious—can unite in this shared sentiment. How we pay off the public debt or resume specie payments is less important than having a plan that everyone agrees on. A united commitment to act is far more valuable than differing opinions on how to act. Legislation on this issue might not be necessary right now, or even wise, but it will be needed when civil law is more fully restored across the country and trade returns to its normal patterns.

It will be my endeavor to execute all laws in good faith, to collect all revenues assessed, and to have them properly accounted for and economically disbursed. I will to the best of my ability appoint to office those only who will carry out this design.

It will be my goal to enforce all laws honestly, to collect all owed revenues, and to ensure they are accurately accounted for and spent wisely. I will do my best to appoint only those who will support this mission.

In regard to foreign policy, I would deal with nations as equitable law requires individuals to deal with each other, and I would protect the law-abiding citizen, whether of native or foreign birth, wherever his rights are jeopardized or the flag of our country floats. I would respect the rights of all nations, demanding equal respect for our own. If others depart from this rule in their dealings with us, we may be compelled to follow their precedent.

When it comes to foreign policy, I would treat other countries the way fair laws expect individuals to treat each other, and I would stand up for law-abiding citizens, whether they are born here or abroad, whenever their rights are at risk or our country's flag is present. I would honor the rights of all nations and expect the same respect for ours. If others don't follow this principle when dealing with us, we might have to do the same.

The proper treatment of the original occupants of this land—the Indians one deserving of careful study. I will favor any course toward them which tends to their civilization and ultimate citizenship.

The proper treatment of the original inhabitants of this land—the Indians—deserves careful consideration. I will support any actions that promote their development and eventual citizenship.

The question of suffrage is one which is likely to agitate the public so long as a portion of the citizens of the nation are excluded from its privileges in any State. It seems to me very desirable that this question should be settled now, and I entertain the hope and express the desire that it may be by the ratification of the fifteenth article of amendment to the Constitution.

The issue of voting rights will continue to stir public interest as long as some citizens are denied these privileges in any state. I think it's important that we resolve this issue now, and I hope and wish that it can be addressed by ratifying the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution.

In conclusion I ask patient forbearance one toward another throughout the land, and a determined effort on the part of every citizen to do his share toward cementing a happy union; and I ask the prayers of the nation to Almighty God in behalf of this consummation.

In conclusion, I ask for patience and understanding from everyone across the country, and for a strong commitment from every citizen to play their part in creating a joyful union; and I ask for the nation to pray to Almighty God for this accomplishment.






ULYSSES S. GRANT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1873

[Transcriber's note: Frigid temperatures caused many of the events planned for the second inauguration to be abandoned. The thermometer did not rise much above zero all day, persuading many to avoid the ceremony on the East Portico of the Capitol. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Salmon Chase. A parade and a display of fireworks were featured later that day, as well as a ball in a temporary wooden structure on Judiciary Square. The wind blew continuously through the ballroom and many of the guests at the ball never removed their coats.]

[Transcriber's note: Freezing temperatures caused many of the events planned for the second inauguration to be canceled. The temperature barely rose above zero all day, leading many to skip the ceremony on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Salmon Chase administered the oath of office. A parade and a fireworks display took place later that day, along with a ball in a temporary wooden structure on Judiciary Square. The wind blew constantly through the ballroom, and many guests at the ball kept their coats on the whole time.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

Under Providence I have been called a second time to act as Executive over this great nation. It has been my endeavor in the past to maintain all the laws, and, so far as lay in my power, to act for the best interests of the whole people. My best efforts will be given in the same direction in the future, aided, I trust, by my four years' experience in the office.

Under Providence, I have been asked again to serve as the Executive of this great nation. In the past, I have worked to uphold all the laws and, as much as I could, to act in the best interests of all the people. I will put my best efforts toward this same goal in the future, and I hope to be supported by my four years of experience in this role.

When my first term of the office of Chief Executive began, the country had not recovered from the effects of a great internal revolution, and three of the former States of the Union had not been restored to their Federal relations.

When my first term as Chief Executive started, the country had not recovered from the impact of a major internal revolution, and three of the former States of the Union had not been restored to their Federal relations.

It seemed to me wise that no new questions should be raised so long as that condition of affairs existed. Therefore the past four years, so far as I could control events, have been consumed in the effort to restore harmony, public credit, commerce, and all the arts of peace and progress. It is my firm conviction that the civilized world is tending toward republicanism, or government by the people through their chosen representatives, and that our own great Republic is destined to be the guiding star to all others.

It seemed wise to me that no new questions should be brought up as long as that situation continued. So, for the past four years, as much as I could influence things, I focused on restoring harmony, public trust, commerce, and all the peaceful arts of progress. I strongly believe that the civilized world is moving towards republicanism, or government by the people through their elected representatives, and that our own great Republic is meant to be the guiding light for all others.

Under our Republic we support an army less than that of any European power of any standing and a navy less than that of either of at least five of them. There could be no extension of territory on the continent which would call for an increase of this force, but rather might such extension enable us to diminish it.

Under our Republic, we maintain an army smaller than that of any European power with a significant military presence, and a navy that is smaller than at least five of them. There's no expansion of territory on the continent that would require us to increase this force; in fact, such expansion could allow us to reduce it instead.

The theory of government changes with general progress. Now that the telegraph is made available for communicating thought, together with rapid transit by steam, all parts of a continent are made contiguous for all purposes of government, and communication between the extreme limits of the country made easier than it was throughout the old thirteen States at the beginning of our national existence.

The theory of government evolves with societal progress. With the telegraph now available for sharing ideas and quick travel by train, every part of a continent is brought closer together for all aspects of governance, making communication between the farthest reaches of the country easier than it was across the original thirteen States at the start of our nation.

The effects of the late civil strife have been to free the slave and make him a citizen. Yet he is not possessed of the civil rights which citizenship should carry with it. This is wrong, and should be corrected. To this correction I stand committed, so far as Executive influence can avail.

The effects of the recent civil conflict have been to liberate the slave and grant him citizenship. However, he still doesn’t have the civil rights that should come with citizenship. This is unjust and needs to be fixed. I am dedicated to this change, as much as I can use my Executive influence to make it happen.

Social equality is not a subject to be legislated upon, nor shall I ask that anything be done to advance the social status of the colored man, except to give him a fair chance to develop what there is good in him, give him access to the schools, and when he travels let him feel assured that his conduct will regulate the treatment and fare he will receive.

Social equality isn’t something that can be enforced by law, and I won’t ask for anything more to improve the social standing of Black people than to give them a fair opportunity to cultivate their strengths, access to education, and the assurance that their behavior will determine how they are treated and the hospitality they receive while traveling.

The States lately at war with the General Government are now happily rehabilitated, and no Executive control is exercised in any one of them that would not be exercised in any other State under like circumstances.

The states that were recently in conflict with the federal government are now happily restored, and no executive control is being applied in any of them that wouldn't be applied in any other state under similar circumstances.

In the first year of the past Administration the proposition came up for the admission of Santo Domingo as a Territory of the Union. It was not a question of my seeking, but was a proposition from the people of Santo Domingo, and which I entertained. I believe now, as I did then, that it was for the best interest of this country, for the people of Santo Domingo, and all concerned that the proposition should be received favorably. It was, however, rejected constitutionally, and therefore the subject was never brought up again by me.

In the first year of the previous Administration, the idea of admitting Santo Domingo as a Territory of the Union came up. It wasn't something I pursued; it was a proposal from the people of Santo Domingo, which I considered. I still believe, as I did back then, that accepting this proposal would have been in the best interest of our country, the people of Santo Domingo, and everyone involved. However, it was constitutionally rejected, and as a result, I never raised the issue again.

In future, while I hold my present office, the subject of acquisition of territory must have the support of the people before I will recommend any proposition looking to such acquisition. I say here, however, that I do not share in the apprehension held by many as to the danger of governments becoming weakened and destroyed by reason of their extension of territory. Commerce, education, and rapid transit of thought and matter by telegraph and steam have changed all this. Rather do I believe that our Great Maker is preparing the world, in His own good time, to become one nation, speaking one language, and when armies and navies will be no longer required.

In the future, as long as I hold my current position, any proposal for acquiring territory must have the backing of the people before I will recommend it. However, I want to clarify that I don’t share the concerns that many have about the dangers of governments becoming weak or collapsing due to territorial expansion. Trade, education, and the rapid exchange of ideas and goods through telegraph and steam have changed all of this. Instead, I believe that our Creator is preparing the world, in His own time, to become one nation, speaking one language, where armies and navies will no longer be necessary.

My efforts in the future will be directed to the restoration of good feeling between the different sections of our common country; to the restoration of our currency to a fixed value as compared with the world's standard of values—gold—and, if possible, to a par with it; to the construction of cheap routes of transit throughout the land, to the end that the products of all may find a market and leave a living remuneration to the producer; to the maintenance of friendly relations with all our neighbors and with distant nations; to the reestablishment of our commerce and share in the carrying trade upon the ocean; to the encouragement of such manufacturing industries as can be economically pursued in this country, to the end that the exports of home products and industries may pay for our imports—the only sure method of returning to and permanently maintaining a specie basis; to the elevation of labor; and, by a humane course, to bring the aborigines of the country under the benign influences of education and civilization. It is either this or war of extermination: Wars of extermination, engaged in by people pursuing commerce and all industrial pursuits, are expensive even against the weakest people, and are demoralizing and wicked. Our superiority of strength and advantages of civilization should make us lenient toward the Indian. The wrong inflicted upon him should be taken into account and the balance placed to his credit. The moral view of the question should be considered and the question asked, Can not the Indian be made a useful and productive member of society by proper teaching and treatment? If the effort is made in good faith, we will stand better before the civilized nations of the earth and in our own consciences for having made it.

My future efforts will focus on restoring positive relationships between the different regions of our country; stabilizing our currency to hold a fixed value in relation to the world's standard—gold—and, if possible, matching it; building affordable transportation routes across the country so that everyone’s products can reach the market and provide fair wages to producers; maintaining friendly relations with our neighbors and distant nations; reviving our trade and involvement in international shipping; encouraging manufacturing industries that can be sustainably developed here, so that our exports of local products can cover our imports—the only reliable way to return to and keep a gold standard; uplifting the labor force; and, through compassionate actions, integrating the indigenous people into the positive influences of education and civilization. It’s either this or a war of extermination: wars of annihilation, waged by those engaged in commerce and industry, are costly even against the weakest adversaries, and they are both destructive and immoral. Our strength and civilizational advantages should lead us to show kindness toward Native Americans. We must acknowledge the wrongs done to them and balance the scales in their favor. We should consider the moral perspective and ask whether the Native American can become a valuable and productive member of society through proper education and treatment. If we genuinely make this effort, we will be seen more favorably by the civilized nations of the world and feel better about ourselves for having tried.

All these things are not to be accomplished by one individual, but they will receive my support and such recommendations to Congress as will in my judgment best serve to carry them into effect. I beg your support and encouragement.

All these things can't be achieved by just one person, but I will provide my support and suggest to Congress what I believe will best help make them happen. I ask for your support and encouragement.

It has been, and is, my earnest desire to correct abuses that have grown up in the civil service of the country. To secure this reformation rules regulating methods of appointment and promotions were established and have been tried. My efforts for such reformation shall be continued to the best of my judgment. The spirit of the rules adopted will be maintained.

It has been, and still is, my sincere wish to fix the problems that have developed in the country's civil service. To achieve this reform, rules about how appointments and promotions are handled were put in place and have been tested. I will continue my efforts for this reform based on my best judgment. The principles behind the rules we adopted will be upheld.

I acknowledge before this assemblage, representing, as it does, every section of our country, the obligation I am under to my countrymen for the great honor they have conferred on me by returning me to the highest office within their gift, and the further obligation resting on me to render to them the best services within my power. This I promise, looking forward with the greatest anxiety to the day when I shall be released from responsibilities that at times are almost overwhelming, and from which I have scarcely had a respite since the eventful firing upon Fort Sumter, in April, 1861, to the present day. My services were then tendered and accepted under the first call for troops growing out of that event.

I stand before this gathering, which represents every part of our nation, fully aware of the responsibility I have to my fellow citizens for the incredible honor they've given me by electing me to the highest office they can bestow. I also feel a strong obligation to provide them with the best service I can offer. I make this promise while looking ahead with great anticipation to the day when I will be free from responsibilities that sometimes feel nearly overwhelming, a burden I've hardly had a break from since the significant attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861, up to now. I offered my services then, and they were accepted with the first call for troops that followed the event.

I did not ask for place or position, and was entirely without influence or the acquaintance of persons of influence, but was resolved to perform my part in a struggle threatening the very existence of the nation. I performed a conscientious duty, without asking promotion or command, and without a revengeful feeling toward any section or individual.

I didn’t seek a role or status, and I had no connections or influence, but I was determined to do my part in a fight that was endangering the nation’s existence. I fulfilled my duty with integrity, without seeking advancement or authority, and without harboring any desire for revenge against any group or person.

Notwithstanding this, throughout the war, and from my candidacy for my present office in 1868 to the close of the last Presidential campaign, I have been the subject of abuse and slander scarcely ever equaled in political history, which to-day I feel that I can afford to disregard in view of your verdict, which I gratefully accept as my vindication.

Despite all that, during the war and from my campaign for my current position in 1868 until the end of the last Presidential race, I have faced abuse and slander almost unmatched in political history. Today, I feel I can ignore it all in light of your decision, which I gratefully accept as my vindication.






RUTHERFORD B. HAYES, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 5, 1877

[Transcriber's note: The outcome of the election of 1876 was not known until the week before the inauguration itself. Democrat Samuel Tilden had won the greater number of popular votes and lacked only one electoral vote to claim a majority in the electoral college. Twenty disputed electoral votes, however, kept hopes alive for Republican Governor Hayes of Ohio. A fifteen-member Electoral Commission was appointed by the Congress to deliberate the outcome of the election. By a majority vote of 8 to 7 the Commission gave all of the disputed votes to the Republican candidate, and Mr. Hayes was elected President on March 2. Since March 4 was a Sunday, he took the oath of office in the Red Room at the White House on March 3, and again on Monday on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Morrison Waite administered both oaths.]

[Transcriber's note: The outcome of the 1876 election wasn't known until a week before the inauguration. Democrat Samuel Tilden had received the most popular votes and was just one electoral vote short of a majority in the electoral college. However, twenty disputed electoral votes kept Republican Governor Hayes of Ohio in the race. Congress appointed a fifteen-member Electoral Commission to review the election results. By a majority vote of 8 to 7, the Commission awarded all the disputed votes to the Republican candidate, and Mr. Hayes was declared President on March 2. Since March 4 was a Sunday, he took the oath of office in the Red Room at the White House on March 3, and again on Monday on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Morrison Waite administered both oaths.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow Citizens:

We have assembled to repeat the public ceremonial, begun by Washington, observed by all my predecessors, and now a time-honored custom, which marks the commencement of a new term of the Presidential office. Called to the duties of this great trust, I proceed, in compliance with usage, to announce some of the leading principles, on the subjects that now chiefly engage the public attention, by which it is my desire to be guided in the discharge of those duties. I shall not undertake to lay down irrevocably principles or measures of administration, but rather to speak of the motives which should animate us, and to suggest certain important ends to be attained in accordance with our institutions and essential to the welfare of our country.

We have gathered to continue the public ceremony that started with Washington, followed by all my predecessors, and has now become a longstanding tradition that marks the beginning of a new Presidential term. Called to take on this significant responsibility, I will, as is customary, share some key principles regarding the issues that currently capture public interest, which I hope will guide me in fulfilling these responsibilities. I won’t try to establish fixed principles or policies for the administration, but I will discuss the motivations that should inspire us and suggest some important goals that we should aim for in line with our institutions and crucial for the well-being of our country.

At the outset of the discussions which preceded the recent Presidential election it seemed to me fitting that I should fully make known my sentiments in regard to several of the important questions which then appeared to demand the consideration of the country. Following the example, and in part adopting the language, of one of my predecessors, I wish now, when every motive for misrepresentation has passed away, to repeat what was said before the election, trusting that my countrymen will candidly weigh and understand it, and that they will feel assured that the sentiments declared in accepting the nomination for the Presidency will be the standard of my conduct in the path before me, charged, as I now am, with the grave and difficult task of carrying them out in the practical administration of the Government so far as depends, under the Constitution and laws on the Chief Executive of the nation.

At the beginning of the discussions leading up to the recent Presidential election, I felt it was important to clearly express my views on several key issues that seemed to need the country’s attention. Following the example and partly adopting the words of one of my predecessors, I want to restate what I said before the election, now that every reason for misrepresentation has passed. I trust that my fellow citizens will thoughtfully consider and understand it, and that they will be confident that the views I expressed when accepting the nomination for the Presidency will serve as my guiding principles moving forward. I am now tasked with the serious and challenging responsibility of implementing these principles in the practical administration of the government, as is required by the Constitution and laws for the Chief Executive of the nation.

The permanent pacification of the country upon such principles and by such measures as will secure the complete protection of all its citizens in the free enjoyment of all their constitutional rights is now the one subject in our public affairs which all thoughtful and patriotic citizens regard as of supreme importance.

The lasting peace of the country based on principles and actions that ensure all citizens fully enjoy their constitutional rights is now the main issue in our public affairs that every thoughtful and patriotic citizen considers extremely important.

Many of the calamitous efforts of the tremendous revolution which has passed over the Southern States still remain. The immeasurable benefits which will surely follow, sooner or later, the hearty and generous acceptance of the legitimate results of that revolution have not yet been realized. Difficult and embarrassing questions meet us at the threshold of this subject. The people of those States are still impoverished, and the inestimable blessing of wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government is not fully enjoyed. Whatever difference of opinion may exist as to the cause of this condition of things, the fact is clear that in the progress of events the time has come when such government is the imperative necessity required by all the varied interests, public and private, of those States. But it must not be forgotten that only a local government which recognizes and maintains inviolate the rights of all is a true self-government.

Many of the disastrous effects of the huge revolution that swept through the Southern States are still present. The immense benefits that will eventually come from fully and wholeheartedly accepting the rightful outcomes of that revolution have not yet been seen. We face difficult and uncomfortable questions as we approach this topic. The people in those States are still struggling, and the invaluable advantage of wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government is not fully experienced. Regardless of the differing opinions about the reasons for this situation, it’s clear that the time has arrived when such governance is an essential need for all the diverse public and private interests in those States. However, it should not be forgotten that only a local government that recognizes and protects the rights of everyone is true self-government.

With respect to the two distinct races whose peculiar relations to each other have brought upon us the deplorable complications and perplexities which exist in those States, it must be a government which guards the interests of both races carefully and equally. It must be a government which submits loyally and heartily to the Constitution and the laws—the laws of the nation and the laws of the States themselves—accepting and obeying faithfully the whole Constitution as it is.

Regarding the two different races whose unique relationships have caused the unfortunate complications and confusion in those states, there must be a government that carefully and equally protects the interests of both groups. It needs to be a government that fully respects and follows the Constitution and the laws—both the national laws and the state laws—accepting and faithfully obeying the entire Constitution as it stands.

Resting upon this sure and substantial foundation, the superstructure of beneficent local governments can be built up, and not otherwise. In furtherance of such obedience to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution, and in behalf of all that its attainment implies, all so-called party interests lose their apparent importance, and party lines may well be permitted to fade into insignificance. The question we have to consider for the immediate welfare of those States of the Union is the question of government or no government; of social order and all the peaceful industries and the happiness that belongs to it, or a return to barbarism. It is a question in which every citizen of the nation is deeply interested, and with respect to which we ought not to be, in a partisan sense, either Republicans or Democrats, but fellow-citizens and fellowmen, to whom the interests of a common country and a common humanity are dear.

Resting on this solid foundation, we can build a system of effective local governments, and not otherwise. To honor both the letter and the spirit of the Constitution, and all that achieving it means, all so-called party interests lose their significance, and political lines can fade into irrelevance. The question we need to address for the immediate well-being of the States in the Union is whether we have government or no government; whether we have social order with its peaceful industries and the happiness that comes from it, or whether we return to chaos. This is a matter that concerns every citizen of the nation, and regarding which we should not be, in a partisan way, either Republicans or Democrats, but rather fellow citizens and fellow humans, united by the interests of our common country and shared humanity.

The sweeping revolution of the entire labor system of a large portion of our country and the advance of 4,000,000 people from a condition of servitude to that of citizenship, upon an equal footing with their former masters, could not occur without presenting problems of the gravest moment, to be dealt with by the emancipated race, by their former masters, and by the General Government, the author of the act of emancipation. That it was a wise, just, and providential act, fraught with good for all concerned, is not generally conceded throughout the country. That a moral obligation rests upon the National Government to employ its constitutional power and influence to establish the rights of the people it has emancipated, and to protect them in the enjoyment of those rights when they are infringed or assailed, is also generally admitted.

The major revolution of the entire labor system in a large part of our country and the transition of 4,000,000 people from slavery to citizenship, on equal terms with their former masters, could not happen without presenting very serious challenges to be addressed by the newly freed population, their former masters, and the federal government, which initiated emancipation. It's not widely accepted across the country that this was a wise, fair, and necessary act that benefited everyone involved. However, it is generally recognized that the federal government has a moral obligation to use its constitutional power and influence to establish the rights of the people it has freed and to protect them in enjoying those rights when they are violated or threatened.

The evils which afflict the Southern States can only be removed or remedied by the united and harmonious efforts of both races, actuated by motives of mutual sympathy and regard; and while in duty bound and fully determined to protect the rights of all by every constitutional means at the disposal of my Administration, I am sincerely anxious to use every legitimate influence in favor of honest and efficient local self-government as the true resource of those States for the promotion of the contentment and prosperity of their citizens. In the effort I shall make to accomplish this purpose I ask the cordial cooperation of all who cherish an interest in the welfare of the country, trusting that party ties and the prejudice of race will be freely surrendered in behalf of the great purpose to be accomplished. In the important work of restoring the South it is not the political situation alone that merits attention. The material development of that section of the country has been arrested by the social and political revolution through which it has passed, and now needs and deserves the considerate care of the National Government within the just limits prescribed by the Constitution and wise public economy.

The issues affecting the Southern States can only be solved or improved through the united and collaborative efforts of both races, motivated by mutual compassion and respect. While I am committed to protecting everyone's rights through every constitutional means available to my Administration, I truly want to use all legitimate influence to support honest and effective local self-government as the best solution for these States to promote the well-being and prosperity of their citizens. In my efforts to achieve this goal, I seek the enthusiastic cooperation of everyone who cares about the welfare of the country, hoping that party loyalties and racial prejudices will be put aside for this important mission. In the crucial work of rebuilding the South, we need to focus not just on the political situation. The economic growth of that region has been halted by the social and political upheaval it has experienced, and now it requires and deserves the thoughtful attention of the National Government, within the appropriate limits set by the Constitution and sound public policy.

But at the basis of all prosperity, for that as well as for every other part of the country, lies the improvement of the intellectual and moral condition of the people. Universal suffrage should rest upon universal education. To this end, liberal and permanent provision should be made for the support of free schools by the State governments, and, if need be, supplemented by legitimate aid from national authority.

But at the core of all prosperity, for that as well as for every other part of the country, is the improvement of the intellectual and moral condition of the people. Universal voting rights should be based on universal education. To achieve this, state governments should ensure a consistent and adequate funding for free schools, and if necessary, receive legitimate support from the national government.

Let me assure my countrymen of the Southern States that it is my earnest desire to regard and promote their truest interest—the interests of the white and of the colored people both and equally—and to put forth my best efforts in behalf of a civil policy which will forever wipe out in our political affairs the color line and the distinction between North and South, to the end that we may have not merely a united North or a united South, but a united country.

Let me assure my fellow citizens in the Southern States that I genuinely want to support their true interests—the interests of both white and colored people equally—and to dedicate my best efforts to a civil policy that will completely eliminate the color line and the division between North and South in our political affairs. My goal is for us to have not just a united North or a united South, but a united country.

I ask the attention of the public to the paramount necessity of reform in our civil service—a reform not merely as to certain abuses and practices of so-called official patronage which have come to have the sanction of usage in the several Departments of our Government, but a change in the system of appointment itself; a reform that shall be thorough, radical, and complete; a return to the principles and practices of the founders of the Government. They neither expected nor desired from public officers any partisan service. They meant that public officers should owe their whole service to the Government and to the people. They meant that the officer should be secure in his tenure as long as his personal character remained untarnished and the performance of his duties satisfactory. They held that appointments to office were not to be made nor expected merely as rewards for partisan services, nor merely on the nomination of members of Congress, as being entitled in any respect to the control of such appointments.

I ask for the public's attention to the urgent need for reform in our civil service—not just about fixing certain abuses and practices of so-called official patronage that have become accepted in various government departments, but a fundamental change in the appointment system itself; a reform that is thorough, radical, and complete; a return to the principles and practices of the founders of our government. They neither expected nor wanted public officials to provide partisan services. They intended for public officials to be fully dedicated to the government and the people. They envisioned that an officer would have job security as long as their character remained intact and their work was satisfactory. They believed that appointments to office should not be made or expected just as rewards for partisan services, nor merely through the nominations of Congress members, as if they had any rightful claim to control such appointments.

The fact that both the great political parties of the country, in declaring their principles prior to the election, gave a prominent place to the subject of reform of our civil service, recognizing and strongly urging its necessity, in terms almost identical in their specific import with those I have here employed, must be accepted as a conclusive argument in behalf of these measures. It must be regarded as the expression of the united voice and will of the whole country upon this subject, and both political parties are virtually pledged to give it their unreserved support.

The fact that both major political parties in the country, in outlining their principles before the election, emphasized the need for reforming our civil service and strongly advocated for its necessity, using language very similar to what I’ve used here, should be seen as a decisive argument for these measures. This should be viewed as a reflection of the collective voice and will of the entire country on this issue, and both parties have essentially committed to fully supporting it.

The President of the United States of necessity owes his election to office to the suffrage and zealous labors of a political party, the members of which cherish with ardor and regard as of essential importance the principles of their party organization; but he should strive to be always mindful of the fact that he serves his party best who serves the country best.

The President of the United States owes his election to the efforts and votes of a political party, whose members passionately value the principles of their organization. However, he should always remember that the best way to serve his party is by serving the country first.

In furtherance of the reform we seek, and in other important respects a change of great importance, I recommend an amendment to the Constitution prescribing a term of six years for the Presidential office and forbidding a reelection.

To support the reform we aim for, and in other significant ways that are very important, I propose an amendment to the Constitution that sets a six-year term for the Presidential office and prohibits reelection.

With respect to the financial condition of the country, I shall not attempt an extended history of the embarrassment and prostration which we have suffered during the past three years. The depression in all our varied commercial and manufacturing interests throughout the country, which began in September, 1873, still continues. It is very gratifying, however, to be able to say that there are indications all around us of a coming change to prosperous times.

Regarding the financial situation of the country, I won’t go into detail about the challenges and hardships we've faced over the past three years. The decline in various commercial and manufacturing sectors across the nation, which started in September 1873, is still ongoing. However, it is encouraging to note that there are signs all around us suggesting that better times are on the horizon.

Upon the currency question, intimately connected, as it is, with this topic, I may be permitted to repeat here the statement made in my letter of acceptance, that in my judgment the feeling of uncertainty inseparable from an irredeemable paper currency, with its fluctuation of values, is one of the greatest obstacles to a return to prosperous times. The only safe paper currency is one which rests upon a coin basis and is at all times and promptly convertible into coin.

On the currency issue, which is closely linked to this topic, I want to reiterate what I stated in my letter of acceptance: I believe that the uncertainty that comes with an irredeemable paper currency, with its fluctuating values, is one of the biggest barriers to returning to prosperity. The only reliable paper currency is one that is backed by a coin standard and can always and quickly be exchanged for coin.

I adhere to the views heretofore expressed by me in favor of Congressional legislation in behalf of an early resumption of specie payments, and I am satisfied not only that this is wise, but that the interests, as well as the public sentiment, of the country imperatively demand it.

I stick to the opinions I've shared before about the need for Congress to pass legislation aimed at quickly resuming gold and silver payments, and I'm convinced that this is not only a smart move but that both the nation's interests and public opinion strongly urge it.

Passing from these remarks upon the condition of our own country to consider our relations with other lands, we are reminded by the international complications abroad, threatening the peace of Europe, that our traditional rule of noninterference in the affairs of foreign nations has proved of great value in past times and ought to be strictly observed.

Moving from these observations about our own country to our relationships with other nations, the international issues overseas that are endangering Europe’s peace remind us that our long-standing policy of staying out of foreign matters has been very beneficial in the past and should continue to be strictly followed.

The policy inaugurated by my honored predecessor, President Grant, of submitting to arbitration grave questions in dispute between ourselves and foreign powers points to a new, and incomparably the best, instrumentality for the preservation of peace, and will, as I believe, become a beneficent example of the course to be pursued in similar emergencies by other nations.

The policy started by my respected predecessor, President Grant, of resolving serious disputes with foreign countries through arbitration points to a new, and by far the best, method for maintaining peace. I believe it will serve as a positive example for other nations to follow in similar situations.

If, unhappily, questions of difference should at any time during the period of my Administration arise between the United States and any foreign government, it will certainly be my disposition and my hope to aid in their settlement in the same peaceful and honorable way, thus securing to our country the great blessings of peace and mutual good offices with all the nations of the world.

If, unfortunately, issues of differences arise at any time during my Administration between the United States and any foreign government, I will certainly strive and hope to help resolve them in a peaceful and honorable manner, thereby ensuring our country enjoys the significant benefits of peace and positive relations with all nations around the globe.

Fellow-citizens, we have reached the close of a political contest marked by the excitement which usually attends the contests between great political parties whose members espouse and advocate with earnest faith their respective creeds. The circumstances were, perhaps, in no respect extraordinary save in the closeness and the consequent uncertainty of the result.

Fellow citizens, we have come to the end of a political battle filled with the excitement that typically comes with contests between major political parties whose members passionately support their beliefs. The situation was, perhaps, not particularly unusual except for the tightness and the resulting uncertainty of the outcome.

For the first time in the history of the country it has been deemed best, in view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, that the objections and questions in dispute with reference to the counting of the electoral votes should be referred to the decision of a tribunal appointed for this purpose.

For the first time in the country's history, it has been decided that, given the unique circumstances of the case, the objections and questions regarding the counting of the electoral votes should be sent to a tribunal established for this purpose.

That tribunal—established by law for this sole purpose; its members, all of them, men of long-established reputation for integrity and intelligence, and, with the exception of those who are also members of the supreme judiciary, chosen equally from both political parties; its deliberations enlightened by the research and the arguments of able counsel—was entitled to the fullest confidence of the American people. Its decisions have been patiently waited for, and accepted as legally conclusive by the general judgment of the public. For the present, opinion will widely vary as to the wisdom of the several conclusions announced by that tribunal. This is to be anticipated in every instance where matters of dispute are made the subject of arbitration under the forms of law. Human judgment is never unerring, and is rarely regarded as otherwise than wrong by the unsuccessful party in the contest.

That tribunal—set up by law for this specific purpose; its members, all of them, well-respected individuals known for their integrity and intelligence, and, except for those who are also part of the highest court, chosen equally from both political parties; its discussions informed by the research and arguments of skilled lawyers—was deserving of the full trust of the American people. Its decisions have been patiently awaited and accepted as legally definitive by the public’s general consensus. For now, opinions will vary widely regarding the wisdom of the various conclusions reached by that tribunal. This is to be expected in any situation where disputes are taken to arbitration under the law. Human judgment is never infallible, and it’s usually viewed as wrong by the party that loses.

The fact that two great political parties have in this way settled a dispute in regard to which good men differ as to the facts and the law no less than as to the proper course to be pursued in solving the question in controversy is an occasion for general rejoicing.

The fact that two major political parties have resolved a dispute over which decent people disagree about the facts, the law, and the right approach to take in addressing the issue at hand is a reason for everyone to celebrate.

Upon one point there is entire unanimity in public sentiment—that conflicting claims to the Presidency must be amicably and peaceably adjusted, and that when so adjusted the general acquiescence of the nation ought surely to follow.

There is complete agreement in public opinion that competing claims to the Presidency need to be resolved calmly and peacefully, and once that happens, the general acceptance of the nation should definitely come afterward.

It has been reserved for a government of the people, where the right of suffrage is universal, to give to the world the first example in history of a great nation, in the midst of the struggle of opposing parties for power, hushing its party tumults to yield the issue of the contest to adjustment according to the forms of law.

It has been left to a government of the people, where everyone has the right to vote, to provide the world with the first example in history of a great nation, amidst the struggle of rival parties for power, calming its political chaos to resolve the conflict through lawful means.

Looking for the guidance of that Divine Hand by which the destinies of nations and individuals are shaped, I call upon you, Senators, Representatives, judges, fellow-citizens, here and everywhere, to unite with me in an earnest effort to secure to our country the blessings, not only of material prosperity, but of justice, peace, and union—a union depending not upon the constraint of force, but upon the loving devotion of a free people; "and that all things may be so ordered and settled upon the best and surest foundations that peace and happiness, truth and justice, religion and piety, may be established among us for all generations."

Seeking the guidance of that Divine Hand that shapes the destinies of nations and individuals, I urge you, Senators, Representatives, judges, fellow citizens, here and everywhere, to join me in a serious effort to ensure our country enjoys not only material prosperity but also justice, peace, and unity—a unity that relies not on force but on the loving commitment of a free people; "and that all things may be organized and secured on the best and most reliable foundations so that peace and happiness, truth and justice, religion and reverence, can be established among us for all generations."






JAMES A. GARFIELD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, MARCH 4, 1881

[Transcriber's note: Snow on the ground discouraged many spectators from attending the ceremony at the Capitol. Congressman Garfield had been nominated on his party's 36th ballot at the convention; and he had won the popular vote by a slim margin. The former Civil War general was administered the oath of office by Chief Justice Morrison Waite on the snow-covered East Portico of the Capitol. In the parade and the inaugural ball later that day, John Philip Sousa led the Marine Corps band. The ball was held at the Smithsonian Institution's new National Museum (now the Arts and Industries Building).]

[Transcriber's note: Snow on the ground kept many people from attending the ceremony at the Capitol. Congressman Garfield was nominated on his party's 36th ballot at the convention and narrowly won the popular vote. The former Civil War general took the oath of office from Chief Justice Morrison Waite on the snow-covered East Portico of the Capitol. In the parade and the inaugural ball later that day, John Philip Sousa conducted the Marine Corps band. The ball took place at the Smithsonian Institution's new National Museum (now the Arts and Industries Building).]


Fellow-Citizens:

Citizens:

We stand to-day upon an eminence which overlooks a hundred years of national life—a century crowded with perils, but crowned with the triumphs of liberty and law. Before continuing the onward march let us pause on this height for a moment to strengthen our faith and renew our hope by a glance at the pathway along which our people have traveled.

We stand today on a vantage point that overlooks a hundred years of national life—a century filled with challenges but marked by the victories of freedom and justice. Before we continue our progress, let’s take a moment on this high ground to boost our faith and renew our hope by reflecting on the journey our people have taken.

It is now three days more than a hundred years since the adoption of the first written constitution of the United States—the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. The new Republic was then beset with danger on every hand. It had not conquered a place in the family of nations. The decisive battle of the war for independence, whose centennial anniversary will soon be gratefully celebrated at Yorktown, had not yet been fought. The colonists were struggling not only against the armies of a great nation, but against the settled opinions of mankind; for the world did not then believe that the supreme authority of government could be safely intrusted to the guardianship of the people themselves.

It has now been three days more than a hundred years since the adoption of the first written constitution of the United States—the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. The new Republic was facing danger from all sides. It had not yet secured its place among the nations of the world. The pivotal battle of the war for independence, whose hundredth anniversary we'll soon celebrate at Yorktown, had not yet taken place. The colonists were fighting not just against the armies of a powerful nation but also against the established beliefs of people everywhere; at that time, the world did not believe that the highest authority of government could be safely entrusted to the people themselves.

We can not overestimate the fervent love of liberty, the intelligent courage, and the sum of common sense with which our fathers made the great experiment of self-government. When they found, after a short trial, that the confederacy of States, was too weak to meet the necessities of a vigorous and expanding republic, they boldly set it aside, and in its stead established a National Union, founded directly upon the will of the people, endowed with full power of self-preservation and ample authority for the accomplishment of its great object.

We can't overstate the passionate love of freedom, the smart bravery, and the common sense our founders used when they took on the big challenge of self-government. When they realized, after a brief attempt, that the alliance of States was too weak to handle the needs of a strong and growing republic, they confidently discarded it and instead created a National Union, built directly on the people's will, equipped with the full power to protect itself and enough authority to achieve its significant goals.

Under this Constitution the boundaries of freedom have been enlarged, the foundations of order and peace have been strengthened, and the growth of our people in all the better elements of national life has indicated the wisdom of the founders and given new hope to their descendants. Under this Constitution our people long ago made themselves safe against danger from without and secured for their mariners and flag equality of rights on all the seas. Under this Constitution twenty-five States have been added to the Union, with constitutions and laws, framed and enforced by their own citizens, to secure the manifold blessings of local self-government.

Under this Constitution, the limits of freedom have been expanded, the foundations of order and peace have been reinforced, and the progress of our people in all positive aspects of national life has shown the wisdom of the founders and given new hope to their descendants. Under this Constitution, our people long ago protected themselves from external threats and ensured that their sailors and flag had equal rights on all the seas. Under this Constitution, twenty-five states have joined the Union, each with their own constitutions and laws, created and upheld by their citizens to secure the many benefits of local self-government.

The jurisdiction of this Constitution now covers an area fifty times greater than that of the original thirteen States and a population twenty times greater than that of 1780.

The reach of this Constitution now encompasses an area fifty times larger than that of the original thirteen states and a population twenty times greater than it was in 1780.

The supreme trial of the Constitution came at last under the tremendous pressure of civil war. We ourselves are witnesses that the Union emerged from the blood and fire of that conflict purified and made stronger for all the beneficent purposes of good government.

The ultimate test of the Constitution finally arrived during the intense pressure of the Civil War. We are testament to the fact that the Union emerged from the chaos and destruction of that conflict, purified and strengthened for all the positive goals of good governance.

And now, at the close of this first century of growth, with the inspirations of its history in their hearts, our people have lately reviewed the condition of the nation, passed judgment upon the conduct and opinions of political parties, and have registered their will concerning the future administration of the Government. To interpret and to execute that will in accordance with the Constitution is the paramount duty of the Executive.

And now, at the end of this first century of growth, carrying the lessons of our history in their hearts, our people have recently looked over the state of the nation, evaluated the actions and beliefs of political parties, and expressed their wishes about the future management of the Government. It is the foremost responsibility of the Executive to understand and implement that wish according to the Constitution.

Even from this brief review it is manifest that the nation is resolutely facing to the front, resolved to employ its best energies in developing the great possibilities of the future. Sacredly preserving whatever has been gained to liberty and good government during the century, our people are determined to leave behind them all those bitter controversies concerning things which have been irrevocably settled, and the further discussion of which can only stir up strife and delay the onward march.

Even from this quick overview, it’s clear that the nation is determined to move forward, committed to putting its best efforts into realizing the great possibilities ahead. While responsibly maintaining everything we've achieved in terms of freedom and good governance over the past century, our people are set on putting aside all those heated debates about issues that have already been permanently resolved, as any further discussion will only create conflict and slow down progress.

The supremacy of the nation and its laws should be no longer a subject of debate. That discussion, which for half a century threatened the existence of the Union, was closed at last in the high court of war by a decree from which there is no appeal—that the Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof are and shall continue to be the supreme law of the land, binding alike upon the States and the people. This decree does not disturb the autonomy of the States nor interfere with any of their necessary rights of local self-government, but it does fix and establish the permanent supremacy of the Union.

The supremacy of the nation and its laws should no longer be up for debate. That discussion, which threatened the existence of the Union for fifty years, was finally resolved in the high court of war by a decree that is final—stating that the Constitution and the laws made following it are and will remain the supreme law of the land, binding on both the States and the people. This decree does not disrupt the autonomy of the States or interfere with their necessary rights to self-governance, but it does establish and confirm the permanent supremacy of the Union.

The will of the nation, speaking with the voice of battle and through the amended Constitution, has fulfilled the great promise of 1776 by proclaiming "liberty throughout the land to all the inhabitants thereof."

The will of the nation, expressed through the voice of battle and the updated Constitution, has kept the great promise of 1776 by declaring "liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants."

The elevation of the negro race from slavery to the full rights of citizenship is the most important political change we have known since the adoption of the Constitution of 1787. NO thoughtful man can fail to appreciate its beneficent effect upon our institutions and people. It has freed us from the perpetual danger of war and dissolution. It has added immensely to the moral and industrial forces of our people. It has liberated the master as well as the slave from a relation which wronged and enfeebled both. It has surrendered to their own guardianship the manhood of more than 5,000,000 people, and has opened to each one of them a career of freedom and usefulness. It has given new inspiration to the power of self-help in both races by making labor more honorable to the one and more necessary to the other. The influence of this force will grow greater and bear richer fruit with the coming years.

The rise of the Black community from slavery to full citizenship rights is the most significant political shift we’ve seen since the Constitution was adopted in 1787. No thoughtful person can overlook its positive impact on our institutions and society. It has removed the constant threat of war and disunion. It has greatly enhanced the moral and economic strength of our people. It has freed both the master and the slave from a relationship that harmed and weakened them both. It has entrusted the dignity of over 5,000,000 individuals to their own care and opened up opportunities for freedom and contribution to each of them. It has provided new motivation for self-reliance in both communities by making work more respected for one and more essential for the other. The impact of this change will continue to grow and yield even greater benefits in the years to come.

No doubt this great change has caused serious disturbance to our Southern communities. This is to be deplored, though it was perhaps unavoidable. But those who resisted the change should remember that under our institutions there was no middle ground for the negro race between slavery and equal citizenship. There can be no permanent disfranchised peasantry in the United States. Freedom can never yield its fullness of blessings so long as the law or its administration places the smallest obstacle in the pathway of any virtuous citizen.

No doubt this major change has greatly upset our Southern communities. This is unfortunate, though it was probably inevitable. But those who opposed the change should keep in mind that under our system, there was no middle ground for Black people between slavery and equal citizenship. There cannot be a permanently disenfranchised peasantry in the United States. Freedom can never provide its full blessings as long as the law or its enforcement creates even the smallest barrier for any honest citizen.

The emancipated race has already made remarkable progress. With unquestioning devotion to the Union, with a patience and gentleness not born of fear, they have "followed the light as God gave them to see the light." They are rapidly laying the material foundations of self-support, widening their circle of intelligence, and beginning to enjoy the blessings that gather around the homes of the industrious poor. They deserve the generous encouragement of all good men. So far as my authority can lawfully extend they shall enjoy the full and equal protection of the Constitution and the laws.

The freed individuals have already made impressive progress. With unwavering loyalty to the Union and a patience and kindness not driven by fear, they have "followed the light as God allowed them to see the light." They are quickly establishing the practical foundations for self-sufficiency, expanding their knowledge, and starting to enjoy the benefits that come with the homes of hard-working individuals. They deserve the strong support of all good people. As far as my authority legally allows, they will have the complete and equal protection of the Constitution and the laws.

The free enjoyment of equal suffrage is still in question, and a frank statement of the issue may aid its solution. It is alleged that in many communities negro citizens are practically denied the freedom of the ballot. In so far as the truth of this allegation is admitted, it is answered that in many places honest local government is impossible if the mass of uneducated negroes are allowed to vote. These are grave allegations. So far as the latter is true, it is the only palliation that can be offered for opposing the freedom of the ballot. Bad local government is certainly a great evil, which ought to be prevented; but to violate the freedom and sanctities of the suffrage is more than an evil. It is a crime which, if persisted in, will destroy the Government itself. Suicide is not a remedy. If in other lands it be high treason to compass the death of the king, it shall be counted no less a crime here to strangle our sovereign power and stifle its voice.

The unrestricted enjoyment of equal voting rights is still under debate, and clearly stating the issue could help find a solution. It's claimed that in many communities, Black citizens are essentially denied their voting rights. If this claim is acknowledged as true, the response is that in many areas, honest local government is impossible if a large number of uneducated Black people are allowed to vote. These are serious accusations. If the latter is true, it serves as the only justification offered for opposing voting rights. Poor local governance is indeed a significant problem that should be avoided; however, violating the rights and integrity of voting is more than just a problem. It is a crime that, if continued, will undermine the Government itself. Suicide is not a solution. If in other countries it is considered high treason to conspire against the king, it will be deemed no less a crime here to strangle our sovereign power and silence its voice.

It has been said that unsettled questions have no pity for the repose of nations. It should be said with the utmost emphasis that this question of the suffrage will never give repose or safety to the States or to the nation until each, within its own jurisdiction, makes and keeps the ballot free and pure by the strong sanctions of the law.

It’s been said that unresolved issues have no mercy for the peace of countries. It should be stressed that the issue of voting rights will never allow for peace or security for the states or the nation until each state, within its own authority, ensures that the ballot is free and fair through strict legal enforcement.

But the danger which arises from ignorance in the voter can not be denied. It covers a field far wider than that of negro suffrage and the present condition of the race. It is a danger that lurks and hides in the sources and fountains of power in every state. We have no standard by which to measure the disaster that may be brought upon us by ignorance and vice in the citizens when joined to corruption and fraud in the suffrage.

But the danger that comes from voter ignorance can’t be ignored. It extends far beyond just black voting rights and the current state of the race. It's a risk that sneaks around in the sources of power in every state. We have no way to measure the disaster that ignorance and vice in citizens, when combined with corruption and fraud in voting, could bring upon us.

The voters of the Union, who make and unmake constitutions, and upon whose will hang the destinies of our governments, can transmit their supreme authority to no successors save the coming generation of voters, who are the sole heirs of sovereign power. If that generation comes to its inheritance blinded by ignorance and corrupted by vice, the fall of the Republic will be certain and remediless.

The voters of the Union, who create and change constitutions, and whose choices shape the fate of our governments, can pass their ultimate authority only to the next generation of voters, who are the only true heirs of sovereign power. If that generation inherits this power while being blinded by ignorance and tainted by vice, the downfall of the Republic will be inevitable and irreparable.

The census has already sounded the alarm in the appalling figures which mark how dangerously high the tide of illiteracy has risen among our voters and their children.

The census has already raised concerns with the shocking numbers that show how dangerously high the rate of illiteracy has risen among our voters and their children.

To the South this question is of supreme importance. But the responsibility for the existence of slavery did not rest upon the South alone. The nation itself is responsible for the extension of the suffrage, and is under special obligations to aid in removing the illiteracy which it has added to the voting population. For the North and South alike there is but one remedy. All the constitutional power of the nation and of the States and all the volunteer forces of the people should be surrendered to meet this danger by the savory influence of universal education.

To the South, this issue is extremely important. However, the responsibility for the existence of slavery doesn't fall solely on the South. The entire nation is accountable for the expansion of voting rights and has a special obligation to help eliminate the illiteracy it has contributed to the voting population. For both the North and the South, there is only one solution. All the constitutional power of the nation and the states, along with the volunteer efforts of the people, should be dedicated to addressing this challenge through the positive impact of universal education.

It is the high privilege and sacred duty of those now living to educate their successors and fit them, by intelligence and virtue, for the inheritance which awaits them.

It is a great honor and a serious responsibility for those living today to educate their successors and prepare them, through knowledge and good character, for the inheritance that lies ahead.

In this beneficent work sections and races should be forgotten and partisanship should be unknown. Let our people find a new meaning in the divine oracle which declares that "a little child shall lead them," for our own little children will soon control the destinies of the Republic.

In this meaningful work, we should forget about differences and divisions, and partisanship should not exist. Let our people discover a new understanding in the divine message that says, "a little child shall lead them," because our own little children will soon shape the future of the Republic.

My countrymen, we do not now differ in our judgment concerning the controversies of past generations, and fifty years hence our children will not be divided in their opinions concerning our controversies. They will surely bless their fathers and their fathers' God that the Union was preserved, that slavery was overthrown, and that both races were made equal before the law. We may hasten or we may retard, but we can not prevent, the final reconciliation. Is it not possible for us now to make a truce with time by anticipating and accepting its inevitable verdict?

My fellow citizens, we no longer disagree in our views about the debates of previous generations, and fifty years from now, our children will not be split in their opinions about our issues. They will surely thank their parents and their parents' God that the Union was saved, that slavery was abolished, and that both races were treated equally under the law. We can either speed up or slow down the process, but we cannot stop the ultimate reconciliation. Isn't it possible for us now to come to an agreement with time by embracing and acknowledging its unavoidable conclusion?

Enterprises of the highest importance to our moral and material well-being unite us and offer ample employment of our best powers. Let all our people, leaving behind them the battlefields of dead issues, move forward and in their strength of liberty and the restored Union win the grander victories of peace.

Enterprises that are crucial for our moral and material well-being bring us together and provide plenty of opportunities to use our best abilities. Let's encourage everyone to leave behind the conflicts of past issues, move forward, and, with the strength of our freedoms and the renewed Union, achieve even greater victories for peace.

The prosperity which now prevails is without parallel in our history. Fruitful seasons have done much to secure it, but they have not done all. The preservation of the public credit and the resumption of specie payments, so successfully attained by the Administration of my predecessors, have enabled our people to secure the blessings which the seasons brought.

The prosperity we have today is unmatched in our history. Good harvests have contributed significantly, but they aren't the only reason. The preservation of public credit and the return to gold and silver payments, successfully achieved by my predecessors' administration, have allowed our people to enjoy the benefits the harvests brought.

By the experience of commercial nations in all ages it has been found that gold and silver afford the only safe foundation for a monetary system. Confusion has recently been created by variations in the relative value of the two metals, but I confidently believe that arrangements can be made between the leading commercial nations which will secure the general use of both metals. Congress should provide that the compulsory coinage of silver now required by law may not disturb our monetary system by driving either metal out of circulation. If possible, such an adjustment should be made that the purchasing power of every coined dollar will be exactly equal to its debt-paying power in all the markets of the world.

Throughout history, commercial nations have discovered that gold and silver provide the only reliable basis for a monetary system. Recent variations in the relative values of these two metals have caused some confusion, but I firmly believe that leading commercial nations can come together to ensure the widespread use of both metals. Congress should ensure that the enforced coinage of silver currently mandated by law does not disrupt our monetary system by pushing either metal out of circulation. If possible, we should aim for an adjustment so that the purchasing power of every coined dollar matches its debt-paying power in all global markets.

The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.

The main role of the National Government regarding the country’s currency is to mint money and set its value. There have been serious questions about whether Congress is allowed by the Constitution to make any type of paper money legal tender. The current issuance of United States notes has been supported by the demands of war; however, such paper should rely on its usability and quick exchange for coin at the holder's request, rather than being forced into circulation. These notes are not actual money, but rather promises to pay money. If the holders ask for it, that promise should be honored.

The refunding of the national debt at a lower rate of interest should be accomplished without compelling the withdrawal of the national-bank notes, and thus disturbing the business of the country.

The refinancing of the national debt at a lower interest rate should be done without forcing the withdrawal of national bank notes, avoiding disruption to the country’s business.

I venture to refer to the position I have occupied on financial questions during a long service in Congress, and to say that time and experience have strengthened the opinions I have so often expressed on these subjects.

I want to mention the role I’ve held on financial issues during my long time in Congress, and I can say that time and experience have reinforced the views I’ve frequently shared on these topics.

The finances of the Government shall suffer no detriment which it may be possible for my Administration to prevent.

The government's finances will not face any harm that my administration can prevent.

The interests of agriculture deserve more attention from the Government than they have yet received. The farms of the United States afford homes and employment for more than one-half our people, and furnish much the largest part of all our exports. As the Government lights our coasts for the protection of mariners and the benefit of commerce, so it should give to the tillers of the soil the best lights of practical science and experience.

The interests of agriculture deserve more attention from the government than they have received so far. The farms in the United States provide homes and jobs for more than half of our population and contribute the majority of our exports. Just as the government lights up our coasts to protect sailors and support trade, it should offer farmers the best knowledge from practical science and experience.

Our manufacturers are rapidly making us industrially independent, and are opening to capital and labor new and profitable fields of employment. Their steady and healthy growth should still be matured. Our facilities for transportation should be promoted by the continued improvement of our harbors and great interior waterways and by the increase of our tonnage on the ocean.

Our manufacturers are quickly making us economically independent and are creating new and profitable job opportunities for both capital and labor. Their consistent and positive growth still needs to be fully developed. We should enhance our transportation capabilities by continuing to improve our harbors and major inland waterways, as well as increasing our shipping capacity on the ocean.

The development of the world's commerce has led to an urgent demand for shortening the great sea voyage around Cape Horn by constructing ship canals or railways across the isthmus which unites the continents. Various plans to this end have been suggested and will need consideration, but none of them has been sufficiently matured to warrant the United States in extending pecuniary aid. The subject, however, is one which will immediately engage the attention of the Government with a view to a thorough protection to American interests. We will urge no narrow policy nor seek peculiar or exclusive privileges in any commercial route; but, in the language of my predecessor, I believe it to be the right "and duty of the United States to assert and maintain such supervision and authority over any interoceanic canal across the isthmus that connects North and South America as will protect our national interest."

The growth of global trade has created an urgent need to shorten the lengthy sea journey around Cape Horn by building ship canals or railways across the isthmus that connects the continents. Several proposals have been put forward for this purpose and will need careful evaluation, but none are advanced enough to justify the United States providing financial support. However, this issue will soon capture the Government’s attention in order to effectively protect American interests. We won’t promote a narrow policy or seek special or exclusive privileges on any trade route; rather, as my predecessor stated, I believe it is the right "and duty of the United States to assert and maintain such supervision and authority over any interoceanic canal across the isthmus that connects North and South America as will protect our national interest."

The Constitution guarantees absolute religious freedom. Congress is prohibited from making any law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The Territories of the United States are subject to the direct legislative authority of Congress, and hence the General Government is responsible for any violation of the Constitution in any of them. It is therefore a reproach to the Government that in the most populous of the Territories the constitutional guaranty is not enjoyed by the people and the authority of Congress is set at naught. The Mormon Church not only offends the moral sense of manhood by sanctioning polygamy, but prevents the administration of justice through ordinary instrumentalities of law.

The Constitution guarantees complete freedom of religion. Congress cannot make any law that establishes a religion or restricts the free practice of it. The Territories of the United States fall under the direct legislative power of Congress, making the federal government accountable for any violations of the Constitution there. It is therefore a shame for the government that in the most populated Territory, the constitutional guarantee is not available to the people and Congress's authority is ignored. The Mormon Church not only goes against basic moral values by allowing polygamy, but it also obstructs the administration of justice through regular legal means.

In my judgment it is the duty of Congress, while respecting to the uttermost the conscientious convictions and religious scruples of every citizen, to prohibit within its jurisdiction all criminal practices, especially of that class which destroy the family relations and endanger social order. Nor can any ecclesiastical organization be safely permitted to usurp in the smallest degree the functions and powers of the National Government.

In my opinion, Congress has the responsibility, while fully respecting the beliefs and religious concerns of every citizen, to ban all criminal activities within its jurisdiction, especially those that undermine family relationships and threaten social order. Additionally, no religious organization should be allowed to take over even a small part of the functions and powers of the National Government.

The civil service can never be placed on a satisfactory basis until it is regulated by law. For the good of the service itself, for the protection of those who are intrusted with the appointing power against the waste of time and obstruction to the public business caused by the inordinate pressure for place, and for the protection of incumbents against intrigue and wrong, I shall at the proper time ask Congress to fix the tenure of the minor offices of the several Executive Departments and prescribe the grounds upon which removals shall be made during the terms for which incumbents have been appointed.

The civil service will never be truly effective until it's regulated by law. For the benefit of the service itself, to protect those who have the authority to make appointments from the time-wasting pressures and disruptions to public business caused by excessive demands for positions, and to safeguard current officeholders from manipulation and injustice, I will, at the right moment, ask Congress to establish the tenure for minor positions in the various Executive Departments and outline the reasons for which removals should occur during the terms for which individuals have been appointed.

Finally, acting always within the authority and limitations of the Constitution, invading neither the rights of the States nor the reserved rights of the people, it will be the purpose of my Administration to maintain the authority of the nation in all places within its jurisdiction; to enforce obedience to all the laws of the Union in the interests of the people; to demand rigid economy in all the expenditures of the Government, and to require the honest and faithful service of all executive officers, remembering that the offices were created, not for the benefit of incumbents or their supporters, but for the service of the Government.

Finally, always acting within the authority and limits of the Constitution, respecting both the rights of the States and the reserved rights of the people, my Administration will aim to uphold the authority of the nation in all areas under its jurisdiction; to ensure compliance with all the laws of the Union for the benefit of the people; to insist on strict budget management in all government spending, and to expect the honest and dedicated service of all executive officers, keeping in mind that these offices were established, not for the advantage of those holding them or their supporters, but for the service of the Government.

And now, fellow-citizens, I am about to assume the great trust which you have committed to my hands. I appeal to you for that earnest and thoughtful support which makes this Government in fact, as it is in law, a government of the people.

And now, fellow citizens, I'm about to take on the significant responsibility that you have entrusted to me. I ask for your genuine and careful support, which makes this government truly a government by the people, just as it is in law.

I shall greatly rely upon the wisdom and patriotism of Congress and of those who may share with me the responsibilities and duties of administration, and, above all, upon our efforts to promote the welfare of this great people and their Government I reverently invoke the support and blessings of Almighty God.

I will greatly depend on the wisdom and patriotism of Congress and those who share my responsibilities in administration, and, most importantly, on our efforts to promote the well-being of this great nation and its Government. I sincerely request the support and blessings of Almighty God.






GROVER CLEVELAND, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1885

[Transcriber's note: On the East Portico of the Capitol, the former Governor of New York was administered the oath of office by Chief Justice Morrison Waite. A Democrat whose popularity, in part, was the result that he was not part of the Washington political establishment, Mr. Cleveland rode to the Capitol with President Arthur, who had taken office upon the assassination of President Garfield. After the ceremony, a fireworks display at the White House and a ball at the Pension Building on Judiciary Square were held for the public.]

[Transcriber's note: On the East Portico of the Capitol, the former Governor of New York took the oath of office from Chief Justice Morrison Waite. A Democrat whose popularity stemmed partly from being outside the Washington political establishment, Mr. Cleveland rode to the Capitol with President Arthur, who had assumed office after President Garfield's assassination. After the ceremony, there was a fireworks show at the White House and a public ball at the Pension Building on Judiciary Square.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow citizens:

In the presence of this vast assemblage of my countrymen I am about to supplement and seal by the oath which I shall take the manifestation of the will of a great and free people. In the exercise of their power and right of self-government they have committed to one of their fellow-citizens a supreme and sacred trust, and he here consecrates himself to their service.

In front of this large crowd of my fellow citizens, I am about to confirm and solidify the expression of the will of a great and free people with the oath I will take. By exercising their power and right to self-govern, they have entrusted one of their own with a supreme and sacred duty, and he now dedicates himself to serving them.

This impressive ceremony adds little to the solemn sense of responsibility with which I contemplate the duty I owe to all the people of the land. Nothing can relieve me from anxiety lest by any act of mine their interests may suffer, and nothing is needed to strengthen my resolution to engage every faculty and effort in the promotion of their welfare.

This impressive ceremony does little to lessen the serious responsibility I feel toward all the people of this country. I can't shake the anxiety that any action I take could negatively affect their interests, and nothing will strengthen my determination to use all my abilities and efforts to improve their well-being.

Amid the din of party strife the people's choice was made, but its attendant circumstances have demonstrated anew the strength and safety of a government by the people. In each succeeding year it more clearly appears that our democratic principle needs no apology, and that in its fearless and faithful application is to be found the surest guaranty of good government.

Amid the noise of political battles, the people's choice was made, but the situation surrounding it has once again shown the strength and reliability of a government run by the people. With each passing year, it becomes clearer that our democratic principle requires no justification, and that its bold and honest application is the best guarantee of good governance.

But the best results in the operation of a government wherein every citizen has a share largely depend upon a proper limitation of purely partisan zeal and effort and a correct appreciation of the time when the heat of the partisan should be merged in the patriotism of the citizen.

But the best outcomes in running a government where every citizen has a stake largely depend on properly limiting purely partisan enthusiasm and effort, and recognizing when partisan passion should give way to the patriotism of the citizen.

To-day the executive branch of the Government is transferred to new keeping. But this is still the Government of all the people, and it should be none the less an object of their affectionate solicitude. At this hour the animosities of political strife, the bitterness of partisan defeat, and the exultation of partisan triumph should be supplanted by an ungrudging acquiescence in the popular will and a sober, conscientious concern for the general weal. Moreover, if from this hour we cheerfully and honestly abandon all sectional prejudice and distrust, and determine, with manly confidence in one another, to work out harmoniously the achievements of our national destiny, we shall deserve to realize all the benefits which our happy form of government can bestow.

Today, the executive branch of the government is going to new leadership. But this is still the government of all the people, and it should continue to be a source of their caring concern. At this moment, the conflicts of political battles, the resentment of losing, and the joy of winning should be replaced by a willing acceptance of the people's will and a serious, thoughtful commitment to the common good. Furthermore, if from this moment we willingly and honestly let go of all regional biases and distrust, and decide, with confidence in one another, to work together to achieve our national goals, we will deserve to gain all the advantages that our wonderful form of government can offer.

On this auspicious occasion we may well renew the pledge of our devotion to the Constitution, which, launched by the founders of the Republic and consecrated by their prayers and patriotic devotion, has for almost a century borne the hopes and the aspirations of a great people through prosperity and peace and through the shock of foreign conflicts and the perils of domestic strife and vicissitudes.

On this special occasion, we should reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution, which was established by the founders of our Republic and blessed by their prayers and patriotism. For nearly a century, it has represented the hopes and dreams of a great nation through times of prosperity and peace, as well as during foreign conflicts and the challenges of internal struggles and changes.

By the Father of his Country our Constitution was commended for adoption as "the result of a spirit of amity and mutual concession." In that same spirit it should be administered, in order to promote the lasting welfare of the country and to secure the full measure of its priceless benefits to us and to those who will succeed to the blessings of our national life. The large variety of diverse and competing interests subject to Federal control, persistently seeking the recognition of their claims, need give us no fear that "the greatest good to the greatest number" will fail to be accomplished if in the halls of national legislation that spirit of amity and mutual concession shall prevail in which the Constitution had its birth. If this involves the surrender or postponement of private interests and the abandonment of local advantages, compensation will be found in the assurance that the common interest is subserved and the general welfare advanced.

By the Father of our Nation, our Constitution was praised for being adopted as "the result of a spirit of friendship and compromise." In that same spirit, it should be upheld to promote the nation's lasting well-being and ensure the full benefits it offers to us and to future generations who will enjoy the blessings of our national life. The wide range of different and competing interests under federal control, which constantly seek acknowledgment of their claims, shouldn’t worry us that "the greatest good for the greatest number" won't be achieved if that spirit of friendship and compromise continues in our national legislation, from which the Constitution originated. If this requires giving up or delaying personal interests and letting go of local advantages, the reward will be the knowledge that the common good is being served and the overall welfare is being improved.

In the discharge of my official duty I shall endeavor to be guided by a just and unstrained construction of the Constitution, a careful observance of the distinction between the powers granted to the Federal Government and those reserved to the States or to the people, and by a cautious appreciation of those functions which by the Constitution and laws have been especially assigned to the executive branch of the Government.

In carrying out my official duties, I will strive to follow a fair and straightforward interpretation of the Constitution, pay close attention to the difference between the powers given to the Federal Government and those reserved for the States or the people, and carefully consider the responsibilities that the Constitution and laws specifically assign to the executive branch of the Government.

But he who takes the oath today to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States only assumes the solemn obligation which every patriotic citizen—on the farm, in the workshop, in the busy marts of trade, and everywhere—should share with him. The Constitution which prescribes his oath, my countrymen, is yours; the Government you have chosen him to administer for a time is yours; the suffrage which executes the will of freemen is yours; the laws and the entire scheme of our civil rule, from the town meeting to the State capitals and the national capital, is yours. Your every voter, as surely as your Chief Magistrate, under the same high sanction, though in a different sphere, exercises a public trust. Nor is this all. Every citizen owes to the country a vigilant watch and close scrutiny of its public servants and a fair and reasonable estimate of their fidelity and usefulness. Thus is the people's will impressed upon the whole framework of our civil polity—municipal, State, and Federal; and this is the price of our liberty and the inspiration of our faith in the Republic.

But the person taking the oath today to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States is assuming the serious responsibility that every patriotic citizen—whether on a farm, in a workshop, in busy marketplaces, or anywhere else—should share with them. The Constitution that outlines their oath, my fellow citizens, is yours; the Government you’ve chosen for them to run temporarily is yours; the right to vote, which reflects the will of free people, is yours; the laws and the entire system of our civil governance, from local meetings to state capitals and the national capital, are yours. Every voter, just like your President, under the same important duty, although in a different role, holds a public responsibility. And that’s not all. Every citizen has a duty to keep a close eye on its public officials and to assess their dedication and effectiveness fairly and reasonably. This is how the will of the people shapes the entire structure of our civil government—local, state, and federal; and this is the cost of our freedom and the source of our faith in the Republic.

It is the duty of those serving the people in public place to closely limit public expenditures to the actual needs of the Government economically administered, because this bounds the right of the Government to exact tribute from the earnings of labor or the property of the citizen, and because public extravagance begets extravagance among the people. We should never be ashamed of the simplicity and prudential economies which are best suited to the operation of a republican form of government and most compatible with the mission of the American people. Those who are selected for a limited time to manage public affairs are still of the people, and may do much by their example to encourage, consistently with the dignity of their official functions, that plain way of life which among their fellow-citizens aids integrity and promotes thrift and prosperity.

It is the responsibility of those in public service to strictly limit government spending to what is necessary for efficient management. This is important because it sets boundaries on the government's ability to take taxes from people's earnings or property and because public overspending encourages the same behavior among citizens. We should never feel embarrassed about the simplicity and prudent spending that are most appropriate for a democratic government and align with the values of the American people. Those chosen to manage public affairs for a limited time are still members of the community and can greatly influence others by setting an example that encourages a straightforward lifestyle, which supports integrity, thrift, and prosperity among their fellow citizens.

The genius of our institutions, the needs of our people in their home life, and the attention which is demanded for the settlement and development of the resources of our vast territory dictate the scrupulous avoidance of any departure from that foreign policy commended by the history, the traditions, and the prosperity of our Republic. It is the policy of independence, favored by our position and defended by our known love of justice and by our power. It is the policy of peace suitable to our interests. It is the policy of neutrality, rejecting any share in foreign broils and ambitions upon other continents and repelling their intrusion here. It is the policy of Monroe and of Washington and Jefferson—"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliance with none."

The brilliance of our institutions, the needs of our people in their daily lives, and the focus required for settling and developing the resources of our vast territory all underscore the careful maintenance of the foreign policy praised by the history, traditions, and prosperity of our Republic. This is a policy of independence, supported by our position and defended by our well-known commitment to justice and our strength. It’s a policy of peace that aligns with our interests. It’s a policy of neutrality that avoids involvement in foreign conflicts and ambitions on other continents while resisting their influence here. It’s the policy of Monroe, Washington, and Jefferson—"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none."

A due regard for the interests and prosperity of all the people demands that our finances shall be established upon such a sound and sensible basis as shall secure the safety and confidence of business interests and make the wage of labor sure and steady, and that our system of revenue shall be so adjusted as to relieve the people of unnecessary taxation, having a due regard to the interests of capital invested and workingmen employed in American industries, and preventing the accumulation of a surplus in the Treasury to tempt extravagance and waste.

A proper consideration for the interests and well-being of everyone requires that our finances be built on a solid and practical foundation that ensures the safety and confidence of businesses, while also guaranteeing stable wages for workers. Additionally, our revenue system should be designed to minimize unnecessary taxes for the public, while considering the interests of invested capital and the workers employed in American industries, and preventing a surplus in the Treasury that could lead to overspending and waste.

Care for the property of the nation and for the needs of future settlers requires that the public domain should be protected from purloining schemes and unlawful occupation.

Caring for the nation's property and the needs of future settlers means that the public land must be safeguarded against theft and illegal occupation.

The conscience of the people demands that the Indians within our boundaries shall be fairly and honestly treated as wards of the Government and their education and civilization promoted with a view to their ultimate citizenship, and that polygamy in the Territories, destructive of the family relation and offensive to the moral sense of the civilized world, shall be repressed.

The public conscience insists that the Indigenous people within our borders should be treated fairly and honestly as wards of the Government, with efforts made toward their education and assimilation for future citizenship. Additionally, polygamy in the Territories, which harms family relationships and goes against the moral standards of the civilized world, should be limited.

The laws should be rigidly enforced which prohibit the immigration of a servile class to compete with American labor, with no intention of acquiring citizenship, and bringing with them and retaining habits and customs repugnant to our civilization.

The laws should be strictly enforced to prevent the immigration of a servile class that competes with American workers, with no intention of becoming citizens, and that brings and maintains habits and customs that are opposed to our civilization.

The people demand reform in the administration of the Government and the application of business principles to public affairs. As a means to this end, civil-service reform should be in good faith enforced. Our citizens have the right to protection from the incompetency of public employees who hold their places solely as the reward of partisan service, and from the corrupting influence of those who promise and the vicious methods of those who expect such rewards; and those who worthily seek public employment have the right to insist that merit and competency shall be recognized instead of party subserviency or the surrender of honest political belief.

The people are calling for changes in the way the Government is run and for applying business practices to public affairs. To achieve this, civil-service reform should be genuinely implemented. Our citizens have the right to protection from the incompetence of public employees who keep their jobs just as a reward for party loyalty, and from the corrupting influence of those who make promises and the unethical tactics of those who anticipate such rewards. Those who genuinely seek public employment have the right to demand that merit and competence be recognized instead of political loyalty or compromising honest political beliefs.

In the administration of a government pledged to do equal and exact justice to all men there should be no pretext for anxiety touching the protection of the freedmen in their rights or their security in the enjoyment of their privileges under the Constitution and its amendments. All discussion as to their fitness for the place accorded to them as American citizens is idle and unprofitable except as it suggests the necessity for their improvement. The fact that they are citizens entitles them to all the rights due to that relation and charges them with all its duties, obligations, and responsibilities.

In a government committed to providing equal and fair justice for everyone, there should be no reason to worry about protecting the rights of freedmen or their safety in enjoying the privileges granted by the Constitution and its amendments. Any debate about their suitability for the roles given to them as American citizens is pointless and unproductive, except to highlight the need for their development. The fact that they are citizens gives them all the rights that come with that status and also assigns them all its duties, obligations, and responsibilities.

These topics and the constant and ever-varying wants of an active and enterprising population may well receive the attention and the patriotic endeavor of all who make and execute the Federal law. Our duties are practical and call for industrious application, an intelligent perception of the claims of public office, and, above all, a firm determination, by united action, to secure to all the people of the land the full benefits of the best form of government ever vouchsafed to man. And let us not trust to human effort alone, but humbly acknowledging the power and goodness of Almighty God, who presides over the destiny of nations, and who has at all times been revealed in our country's history, let us invoke His aid and His blessings upon our labors.

These topics and the constantly changing needs of a dynamic and ambitious population deserve the attention and dedicated efforts of everyone involved in making and enforcing federal laws. Our responsibilities are practical and require hard work, a clear understanding of what public office demands, and, most importantly, a strong commitment, through collective action, to ensure that all citizens benefit from the greatest form of government ever granted to humanity. Let’s not rely solely on human efforts, but also humbly acknowledge the power and goodness of Almighty God, who oversees the fate of nations and has always been evident in our country’s history. Let’s seek His support and blessings in our work.






BENJAMIN HARRISON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1889

[Transcriber's note: Nominated on the 8th ballot of the Republican convention, the Civil War veteran, jurist, and Senator from Indiana was the only grandson of a President to be elected to the office, as well as the only incumbent to lose in the following election to the person he had defeated. In a rainstorm, the oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Melville Fuller on the East Portico of the Capitol. President Cleveland held an umbrella over his head as he took the oath. John Philip Sousa's Marine Corps band played for a large crowd at the inaugural ball in the Pension Building.]

[Transcriber's note: Nominated on the 8th ballot of the Republican convention, the Civil War veteran, jurist, and Senator from Indiana was the only grandson of a President to be elected to the office, as well as the only sitting President to lose in the next election to the person he had beaten. During a rainstorm, Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. President Cleveland held an umbrella over his head while taking the oath. John Philip Sousa's Marine Corps band performed for a large crowd at the inaugural ball in the Pension Building.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow Citizens:

There is no constitutional or legal requirement that the President shall take the oath of office in the presence of the people, but there is so manifest an appropriateness in the public induction to office of the chief executive officer of the nation that from the beginning of the Government the people, to whose service the official oath consecrates the officer, have been called to witness the solemn ceremonial. The oath taken in the presence of the people becomes a mutual covenant. The officer covenants to serve the whole body of the people by a faithful execution of the laws, so that they may be the unfailing defense and security of those who respect and observe them, and that neither wealth, station, nor the power of combinations shall be able to evade their just penalties or to wrest them from a beneficent public purpose to serve the ends of cruelty or selfishness.

There’s no constitutional or legal requirement for the President to take the oath of office in front of the public, but it’s clearly appropriate for the nation’s chief executive to be publicly sworn in. From the start of the Government, the people—the ones to whom the official oath is dedicated—have been invited to witness this important ceremony. Taking the oath in front of the public establishes a mutual agreement. The official agrees to serve all citizens by faithfully enforcing the laws so that they protect and secure everyone who respects them. This ensures that no amount of wealth, status, or powerful groups can escape just consequences or manipulate the laws for selfish or cruel purposes.

My promise is spoken; yours unspoken, but not the less real and solemn. The people of every State have here their representatives. Surely I do not misinterpret the spirit of the occasion when I assume that the whole body of the people covenant with me and with each other to-day to support and defend the Constitution and the Union of the States, to yield willing obedience to all the laws and each to every other citizen his equal civil and political rights. Entering thus solemnly into covenant with each other, we may reverently invoke and confidently expect the favor and help of Almighty God—that He will give to me wisdom, strength, and fidelity, and to our people a spirit of fraternity and a love of righteousness and peace.

My promise is spoken; yours is unspoken, but still just as real and serious. The people of every state have their representatives here. I believe I’m capturing the spirit of the moment when I say that everyone here today has agreed with me and with one another to support and defend the Constitution and the Union of the States, to obey all the laws willingly, and to respect each citizen's equal civil and political rights. By entering this solemn agreement with one another, we can respectfully ask for and confidently expect the support and guidance of Almighty God—that He will grant me wisdom, strength, and loyalty, and inspire our people with a spirit of brotherhood and a love for justice and peace.

This occasion derives peculiar interest from the fact that the Presidential term which begins this day is the twenty-sixth under our Constitution. The first inauguration of President Washington took place in New York, where Congress was then sitting, on the 30th day of April, 1789, having been deferred by reason of delays attending the organization of the Congress and the canvass of the electoral vote. Our people have already worthily observed the centennials of the Declaration of Independence, of the battle of Yorktown, and of the adoption of the Constitution, and will shortly celebrate in New York the institution of the second great department of our constitutional scheme of government. When the centennial of the institution of the judicial department, by the organization of the Supreme Court, shall have been suitably observed, as I trust it will be, our nation will have fully entered its second century.

This event is particularly interesting because the Presidential term starting today is the twenty-sixth under our Constitution. The first inauguration of President Washington took place in New York, where Congress was then meeting, on April 30, 1789, having been delayed due to the organization of Congress and the counting of the electoral votes. Our people have already appropriately celebrated the centennials of the Declaration of Independence, the battle of Yorktown, and the adoption of the Constitution, and will soon commemorate in New York the establishment of the second major branch of our constitutional government. When we properly celebrate the centennial of the judicial branch, through the establishment of the Supreme Court, as I hope we will, our nation will have fully entered its second century.

I will not attempt to note the marvelous and in great part happy contrasts between our country as it steps over the threshold into its second century of organized existence under the Constitution and that weak but wisely ordered young nation that looked undauntedly down the first century, when all its years stretched out before it.

I won't try to point out the amazing and mostly positive contrasts between our country as it enters its second century of organized life under the Constitution and that fragile but thoughtfully structured young nation that confidently faced its first century, with all its years ahead of it.

Our people will not fail at this time to recall the incidents which accompanied the institution of government under the Constitution, or to find inspiration and guidance in the teachings and example of Washington and his great associates, and hope and courage in the contrast which thirty-eight populous and prosperous States offer to the thirteen States, weak in everything except courage and the love of liberty, that then fringed our Atlantic seaboard.

Our people will surely remember the events that came with the establishment of government under the Constitution and will seek inspiration and guidance from the teachings and example of Washington and his great companions. They will find hope and courage in the difference between the thirty-eight thriving and prosperous states we have now compared to the thirteen states that were only strong in their courage and love of freedom, which then lined our Atlantic coast.

The Territory of Dakota has now a population greater than any of the original States (except Virginia) and greater than the aggregate of five of the smaller States in 1790. The center of population when our national capital was located was east of Baltimore, and it was argued by many well-informed persons that it would move eastward rather than westward; yet in 1880 it was found to be near Cincinnati, and the new census about to be taken will show another stride to the westward. That which was the body has come to be only the rich fringe of the nation's robe. But our growth has not been limited to territory, population and aggregate wealth, marvelous as it has been in each of those directions. The masses of our people are better fed, clothed, and housed than their fathers were. The facilities for popular education have been vastly enlarged and more generally diffused.

The Dakota Territory now has a population larger than any of the original states (except Virginia) and greater than the total of five of the smaller states in 1790. When our national capital was first established, the center of population was east of Baltimore, and many knowledgeable people argued that it would shift eastward instead of westward; however, by 1880, it was found to be near Cincinnati, and the upcoming census will likely show another move west. What was once the core has become just the rich fringe of the nation's landscape. But our progress isn't just about territory, population, and total wealth, impressive as those achievements are. The majority of our people are now better fed, clothed, and housed than their ancestors were. Access to public education has expanded greatly and become more widespread.

The virtues of courage and patriotism have given recent proof of their continued presence and increasing power in the hearts and over the lives of our people. The influences of religion have been multiplied and strengthened. The sweet offices of charity have greatly increased. The virtue of temperance is held in higher estimation. We have not attained an ideal condition. Not all of our people are happy and prosperous; not all of them are virtuous and law-abiding. But on the whole the opportunities offered to the individual to secure the comforts of life are better than are found elsewhere and largely better than they were here one hundred years ago.

The values of courage and patriotism have recently shown their ongoing presence and growing strength in the hearts and lives of our people. The influence of religion has been amplified and reinforced. The acts of charity have significantly increased. The value of temperance is more highly regarded. We haven't reached an ideal state. Not everyone among us is happy and successful; not everyone is virtuous and obeys the law. But overall, the opportunities available for individuals to achieve a comfortable life are better than what exists elsewhere and much better than they were here a hundred years ago.

The surrender of a large measure of sovereignty to the General Government, effected by the adoption of the Constitution, was not accomplished until the suggestions of reason were strongly reenforced by the more imperative voice of experience. The divergent interests of peace speedily demanded a "more perfect union." The merchant, the shipmaster, and the manufacturer discovered and disclosed to our statesmen and to the people that commercial emancipation must be added to the political freedom which had been so bravely won. The commercial policy of the mother country had not relaxed any of its hard and oppressive features. To hold in check the development of our commercial marine, to prevent or retard the establishment and growth of manufactures in the States, and so to secure the American market for their shops and the carrying trade for their ships, was the policy of European statesmen, and was pursued with the most selfish vigor.

The surrender of a significant amount of sovereignty to the federal government, achieved through the adoption of the Constitution, didn’t happen until the thoughtful suggestions were strongly supported by the urgent lessons of experience. The conflicting interests of peace quickly called for a "more perfect union." Merchants, ship captains, and manufacturers made it clear to our leaders and the public that economic freedom needed to be part of the political independence we had fought so hard to secure. The trade policies of the mother country still maintained their harsh and oppressive aspects. The goal of European leaders was to stifle the growth of our shipping industry, hinder the establishment and expansion of manufacturing in the States, and thereby secure the American market for their businesses and the shipping trade for their vessels, and they pursued this with great selfish ambition.

Petitions poured in upon Congress urging the imposition of discriminating duties that should encourage the production of needed things at home. The patriotism of the people, which no longer found afield of exercise in war, was energetically directed to the duty of equipping the young Republic for the defense of its independence by making its people self-dependent. Societies for the promotion of home manufactures and for encouraging the use of domestics in the dress of the people were organized in many of the States. The revival at the end of the century of the same patriotic interest in the preservation and development of domestic industries and the defense of our working people against injurious foreign competition is an incident worthy of attention. It is not a departure but a return that we have witnessed. The protective policy had then its opponents. The argument was made, as now, that its benefits inured to particular classes or sections.

Petitions flooded Congress asking for tariffs that would support domestic production of essential goods. The patriotism of the people, which no longer had an outlet in war, was passionately redirected toward the goal of preparing the young Republic to defend its independence by making its citizens self-sufficient. Organizations were formed in many states to promote home manufacturing and encourage the use of local materials in clothing. The resurgence at the end of the century of the same patriotic interest in the preservation and growth of domestic industries and the protection of our workers against harmful foreign competition is noteworthy. This isn't a new trend but rather a return to previous values. Even then, the protective policy faced opposition. Critics argued, just as they do today, that its advantages benefited only certain classes or regions.

If the question became in any sense or at any time sectional, it was only because slavery existed in some of the States. But for this there was no reason why the cotton-producing States should not have led or walked abreast with the New England States in the production of cotton fabrics. There was this reason only why the States that divide with Pennsylvania the mineral treasures of the great southeastern and central mountain ranges should have been so tardy in bringing to the smelting furnace and to the mill the coal and iron from their near opposing hillsides. Mill fires were lighted at the funeral pile of slavery. The emancipation proclamation was heard in the depths of the earth as well as in the sky; men were made free, and material things became our better servants.

If the issue ever became regional in any way, it was only because slavery existed in some states. Without that, there would have been no reason for the cotton-producing states not to have led or kept pace with the New England states in making cotton fabrics. The only reason why the states sharing the mineral wealth of the great southeastern and central mountain ranges were slow to bring their coal and iron from the nearby hills to the smelting furnace and the mill was this. Mill fires were ignited at the end of slavery. The emancipation proclamation echoed in the depths of the earth as well as in the sky; people were freed, and material things became our better helpers.

The sectional element has happily been eliminated from the tariff discussion. We have no longer States that are necessarily only planting States. None are excluded from achieving that diversification of pursuits among the people which brings wealth and contentment. The cotton plantation will not be less valuable when the product is spun in the country town by operatives whose necessities call for diversified crops and create a home demand for garden and agricultural products. Every new mine, furnace, and factory is an extension of the productive capacity of the State more real and valuable than added territory.

The regional aspect has thankfully been removed from the tariff debate. We no longer have states that are solely agricultural. None are restricted from diversifying their activities, which leads to wealth and satisfaction. A cotton plantation won't lose value when the cotton is processed in the local town by workers who need a variety of crops and generate a local demand for fruits and vegetables. Every new mine, furnace, and factory expands the state's productive capacity in a way that's more genuine and valuable than just acquiring more land.

Shall the prejudices and paralysis of slavery continue to hang upon the skirts of progress? How long will those who rejoice that slavery no longer exists cherish or tolerate the incapacities it put upon their communities? I look hopefully to the continuance of our protective system and to the consequent development of manufacturing and mining enterprises in the States hitherto wholly given to agriculture as a potent influence in the perfect unification of our people. The men who have invested their capital in these enterprises, the farmers who have felt the benefit of their neighborhood, and the men who work in shop or field will not fail to find and to defend a community of interest.

Will the biases and stagnation of slavery continue to weigh down progress? How long will those who are glad that slavery has ended hold onto or accept the limitations it imposed on their communities? I remain hopeful about the ongoing support for our protective policies and the resulting growth of manufacturing and mining ventures in areas that were previously solely focused on agriculture, as a strong force for fully uniting our people. The investors in these ventures, the farmers who have experienced their advantages in the area, and the workers in shops or fields will surely recognize and defend their shared interests.

Is it not quite possible that the farmers and the promoters of the great mining and manufacturing enterprises which have recently been established in the South may yet find that the free ballot of the workingman, without distinction of race, is needed for their defense as well as for his own? I do not doubt that if those men in the South who now accept the tariff views of Clay and the constitutional expositions of Webster would courageously avow and defend their real convictions they would not find it difficult, by friendly instruction and cooperation, to make the black man their efficient and safe ally, not only in establishing correct principles in our national administration, but in preserving for their local communities the benefits of social order and economical and honest government. At least until the good offices of kindness and education have been fairly tried the contrary conclusion can not be plausibly urged.

Is it not possible that the farmers and the promoters of the major mining and manufacturing businesses recently established in the South might find that the free vote of the working man, regardless of race, is essential for their defense as well as his own? I believe that if those in the South who currently support Clay's tariff ideas and Webster's constitutional explanations would bravely express and defend their true beliefs, they could easily, through friendly guidance and cooperation, make the Black man their effective and reliable ally, not only in establishing the right principles in our national government but also in maintaining the benefits of social order and fair, honest governance in their local communities. At least until the positive impact of kindness and education has been genuinely attempted, it cannot be reasonably argued otherwise.

I have altogether rejected the suggestion of a special Executive policy for any section of our country. It is the duty of the Executive to administer and enforce in the methods and by the instrumentalities pointed out and provided by the Constitution all the laws enacted by Congress. These laws are general and their administration should be uniform and equal. As a citizen may not elect what laws he will obey, neither may the Executive eject which he will enforce. The duty to obey and to execute embraces the Constitution in its entirety and the whole code of laws enacted under it. The evil example of permitting individuals, corporations, or communities to nullify the laws because they cross some selfish or local interest or prejudices is full of danger, not only to the nation at large, but much more to those who use this pernicious expedient to escape their just obligations or to obtain an unjust advantage over others. They will presently themselves be compelled to appeal to the law for protection, and those who would use the law as a defense must not deny that use of it to others.

I have completely rejected the idea of a special Executive policy for any part of our country. It's the Executive's job to administer and enforce all the laws passed by Congress using the methods and tools outlined in the Constitution. These laws are meant to be general, and their enforcement should be consistent and fair. Just as a citizen can’t choose which laws to follow, the Executive can’t pick and choose which laws to enforce. The responsibility to follow and enforce encompasses the entire Constitution and all the laws created under it. Allowing individuals, corporations, or communities to ignore the laws because they conflict with some selfish or local interests or biases is extremely dangerous, not just for the nation as a whole, but especially for those who resort to this harmful tactic to dodge their rightful obligations or gain an unfair advantage over others. They will soon find themselves needing to rely on the law for protection, and those who use the law as a shield cannot deny that right to others.

If our great corporations would more scrupulously observe their legal limitations and duties, they would have less cause to complain of the unlawful limitations of their rights or of violent interference with their operations. The community that by concert, open or secret, among its citizens denies to a portion of its members their plain rights under the law has severed the only safe bond of social order and prosperity. The evil works from a bad center both ways. It demoralizes those who practice it and destroys the faith of those who suffer by it in the efficiency of the law as a safe protector. The man in whose breast that faith has been darkened is naturally the subject of dangerous and uncanny suggestions. Those who use unlawful methods, if moved by no higher motive than the selfishness that prompted them, may well stop and inquire what is to be the end of this.

If our major companies paid closer attention to their legal limits and responsibilities, they would have fewer reasons to complain about the illegal restrictions on their rights or about violent disruptions to their operations. A community that, whether openly or secretly, denies a portion of its members their basic rights under the law has broken the only secure bond of social order and prosperity. The harm comes from a corrupt source and affects everyone involved. It corrupts those who engage in it and undermines the trust of those who are affected by it in the law’s ability to protect them. A person whose confidence in the law has been shaken is naturally more susceptible to dangerous and unsettling ideas. Those who resort to illegal methods, even if motivated only by their own selfish interests, should consider what the outcome of this behavior will be.

An unlawful expedient can not become a permanent condition of government. If the educated and influential classes in a community either practice or connive at the systematic violation of laws that seem to them to cross their convenience, what can they expect when the lesson that convenience or a supposed class interest is a sufficient cause for lawlessness has been well learned by the ignorant classes? A community where law is the rule of conduct and where courts, not mobs, execute its penalties is the only attractive field for business investments and honest labor.

An illegal shortcut can't be a permanent way for a government to operate. If the educated and influential people in a community either break the law or turn a blind eye to its consistent violation because they find it inconvenient, what do they expect when the less educated members of society learn that convenience or a perceived class interest justifies breaking the law? A community where law determines behavior and where courts, not mobs, enforce penalties is the only appealing place for business investments and honest work.

Our naturalization laws should be so amended as to make the inquiry into the character and good disposition of persons applying for citizenship more careful and searching. Our existing laws have been in their administration an unimpressive and often an unintelligible form. We accept the man as a citizen without any knowledge of his fitness, and he assumes the duties of citizenship without any knowledge as to what they are. The privileges of American citizenship are so great and its duties so grave that we may well insist upon a good knowledge of every person applying for citizenship and a good knowledge by him of our institutions. We should not cease to be hospitable to immigration, but we should cease to be careless as to the character of it. There are men of all races, even the best, whose coming is necessarily a burden upon our public revenues or a threat to social order. These should be identified and excluded.

Our naturalization laws should be updated to ensure that we carefully investigate the character and intentions of individuals applying for citizenship. The way we currently enforce these laws is often ineffective and confusing. We grant citizenship to people without truly understanding their qualifications, and they take on the responsibilities of citizenship without knowing what those entail. Given the significant privileges and serious responsibilities associated with American citizenship, we have every right to expect a thorough understanding of every applicant's background and for them to have a solid grasp of our institutions. We shouldn't stop being welcoming to immigrants, but we must be more diligent about the quality of immigration. There are individuals from all backgrounds, including the most respectable, whose arrival can negatively impact our public resources or threaten social stability. These individuals should be identified and denied entry.

We have happily maintained a policy of avoiding all interference with European affairs. We have been only interested spectators of their contentions in diplomacy and in war, ready to use our friendly offices to promote peace, but never obtruding our advice and never attempting unfairly to coin the distresses of other powers into commercial advantage to ourselves. We have a just right to expect that our European policy will be the American policy of European courts.

We have happily kept a policy of staying out of European affairs. We have been just interested observers of their disputes in diplomacy and war, ready to offer our help to promote peace, but we never push our advice on them and we never try to unfairly profit from the problems of other countries. We have every right to expect that our European policy will reflect the American stance in European courts.

It is so manifestly incompatible with those precautions for our peace and safety which all the great powers habitually observe and enforce in matters affecting them that a shorter waterway between our eastern and western seaboards should be dominated by any European Government that we may confidently expect that such a purpose will not be entertained by any friendly power.

It is clearly at odds with the measures for our peace and safety that all the major powers typically uphold and enforce in matters that concern them that a shorter waterway between our eastern and western coastlines should be controlled by any European government. Therefore, we can confidently expect that no friendly power will consider such a goal.

We shall in the future, as in the past, use every endeavor to maintain and enlarge our friendly relations with all the great powers, but they will not expect us to look kindly upon any project that would leave us subject to the dangers of a hostile observation or environment. We have not sought to dominate or to absorb any of our weaker neighbors, but rather to aid and encourage them to establish free and stable governments resting upon the consent of their own people. We have a clear right to expect, therefore, that no European Government will seek to establish colonial dependencies upon the territory of these independent American States. That which a sense of justice restrains us from seeking they may be reasonably expected willingly to forego.

In the future, just like in the past, we will do everything we can to maintain and strengthen our friendly relations with all major powers, but they shouldn't expect us to support any plans that would put us at risk of hostile observation or danger. We haven't tried to control or take in any of our weaker neighbors; instead, we've aimed to help and encourage them to create free and stable governments based on the will of their people. Therefore, we have every right to expect that no European government will try to create colonial dependencies in the territories of these independent American states. What our sense of fairness prevents us from pursuing, they can reasonably be expected to refrain from as well.

It must not be assumed, however, that our interests are so exclusively American that our entire inattention to any events that may transpire elsewhere can be taken for granted. Our citizens domiciled for purposes of trade in all countries and in many of the islands of the sea demand and will have our adequate care in their personal and commercial rights. The necessities of our Navy require convenient coaling stations and dock and harbor privileges. These and other trading privileges we will feel free to obtain only by means that do not in any degree partake of coercion, however feeble the government from which we ask such concessions. But having fairly obtained them by methods and for purposes entirely consistent with the most friendly disposition toward all other powers, our consent will be necessary to any modification or impairment of the concession.

We shouldn’t assume that our interests are so exclusively American that we can ignore events happening elsewhere. Our citizens engaged in trade in various countries and islands expect us to protect their personal and commercial rights. Our Navy needs convenient refueling stations and access to docks and harbors. We’ll pursue these and other trading privileges without resorting to any form of coercion, no matter how weak the government we’re negotiating with. But once we’ve obtained these privileges fairly and for purposes that align with a friendly approach toward all other nations, our agreement will be necessary for any changes or reductions to those concessions.

We shall neither fail to respect the flag of any friendly nation or the just rights of its citizens, nor to exact the like treatment for our own. Calmness, justice, and consideration should characterize our diplomacy. The offices of an intelligent diplomacy or of friendly arbitration in proper cases should be adequate to the peaceful adjustment of all international difficulties. By such methods we will make our contribution to the world's peace, which no nation values more highly, and avoid the opprobrium which must fall upon the nation that ruthlessly breaks it.

We will always respect the flag of any friendly nation and the rights of its citizens, and we expect the same treatment for our own. Our approach to diplomacy should be marked by calmness, fairness, and thoughtfulness. An intelligent diplomatic office or friendly arbitration in appropriate situations should be enough to peacefully resolve any international issues. By following these methods, we will contribute to global peace, which no nation values more, and avoid the disgrace that comes to a nation that harshly disrupts it.

The duty devolved by law upon the President to nominate and, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint all public officers whose appointment is not otherwise provided for in the Constitution or by act of Congress has become very burdensome and its wise and efficient discharge full of difficulty. The civil list is so large that a personal knowledge of any large number of the applicants is impossible. The President must rely upon the representations of others, and these are often made inconsiderately and without any just sense of responsibility. I have a right, I think, to insist that those who volunteer or are invited to give advice as to appointments shall exercise consideration and fidelity. A high sense of duty and an ambition to improve the service should characterize all public officers.

The law requires the President to nominate and, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint all public officers unless the Constitution or a congressional act provides otherwise. This process has become quite burdensome, and managing it effectively is full of challenges. The civil list is so extensive that it's impossible to personally know a significant number of the applicants. The President has to rely on the input from others, which is often given thoughtlessly and without a real sense of accountability. I believe I have the right to expect that those who offer or are asked to give advice on appointments should do so thoughtfully and responsibly. A strong sense of duty and a desire to improve the service should define all public officers.

There are many ways in which the convenience and comfort of those who have business with our public offices may be promoted by a thoughtful and obliging officer, and I shall expect those whom I may appoint to justify their selection by a conspicuous efficiency in the discharge of their duties. Honorable party service will certainly not be esteemed by me a disqualification for public office, but it will in no case be allowed to serve as a shield of official negligence, incompetency, or delinquency. It is entirely creditable to seek public office by proper methods and with proper motives, and all applicants will be treated with consideration; but I shall need, and the heads of Departments will need, time for inquiry and deliberation. Persistent importunity will not, therefore, be the best support of an application for office. Heads of Departments, bureaus, and all other public officers having any duty connected therewith will be expected to enforce the civil-service law fully and without evasion. Beyond this obvious duty I hope to do something more to advance the reform of the civil service. The ideal, or even my own ideal, I shall probably not attain. Retrospect will be a safer basis of judgment than promises. We shall not, however, I am sure, be able to put our civil service upon a nonpartisan basis until we have secured an incumbency that fair-minded men of the opposition will approve for impartiality and integrity. As the number of such in the civil list is increased removals from office will diminish.

There are many ways to enhance the convenience and comfort of those interacting with our public offices through a considerate and helpful officer. I expect those I appoint to demonstrate their value through clear efficiency in their duties. I will not view honorable party service as a disqualification for public office, but it will never be allowed to excuse negligence, incompetence, or wrongdoing. It's commendable to pursue public office through appropriate methods and with good intentions, and all applicants will be treated with respect; however, I, along with the heads of departments, will need time to investigate and consider. Therefore, persistent pressure will not be the best way to support an application for office. Heads of departments, bureaus, and all other public officials with related responsibilities will be expected to fully enforce civil-service laws without evasion. Beyond this crucial duty, I hope to contribute further to advancing civil service reform. I may not achieve the ideal, even my own ideal. Reflecting on the past will likely be a safer way to judge than making promises. However, I’m confident that we won't be able to establish a nonpartisan civil service until we have secured positions that fair-minded individuals from the opposition would approve for their impartiality and integrity. As the number of such individuals in the civil service increases, removals from office will decrease.

While a Treasury surplus is not the greatest evil, it is a serious evil. Our revenue should be ample to meet the ordinary annual demands upon our Treasury, with a sufficient margin for those extraordinary but scarcely less imperative demands which arise now and then. Expenditure should always be made with economy and only upon public necessity. Wastefulness, profligacy, or favoritism in public expenditures is criminal. But there is nothing in the condition of our country or of our people to suggest that anything presently necessary to the public prosperity, security, or honor should be unduly postponed.

While a Treasury surplus isn’t the worst thing, it is a significant problem. Our revenue should be enough to cover the usual yearly needs of our Treasury, with some extra for the occasional urgent demands that come up. Spending should always be done wisely and only for public needs. Wastefulness, extravagance, or favoritism in public spending is wrong. However, there’s nothing about the state of our country or our people that implies anything necessary for public prosperity, security, or honor should be unnecessarily delayed.

It will be the duty of Congress wisely to forecast and estimate these extraordinary demands, and, having added them to our ordinary expenditures, to so adjust our revenue laws that no considerable annual surplus will remain. We will fortunately be able to apply to the redemption of the public debt any small and unforeseen excess of revenue. This is better than to reduce our income below our necessary expenditures, with the resulting choice between another change of our revenue laws and an increase of the public debt. It is quite possible, I am sure, to effect the necessary reduction in our revenues without breaking down our protective tariff or seriously injuring any domestic industry.

It will be Congress's responsibility to wisely predict and assess these unusual demands and, after adding them to our regular expenses, adjust our tax laws so that there won’t be a significant annual surplus. Luckily, we’ll be able to use any small and unexpected revenue surplus to pay down the national debt. This approach is better than cutting our income below our essential expenditures, leading us to choose between changing our tax laws again or increasing the national debt. I’m confident that we can make the necessary cuts to our revenues without dismantling our protective tariffs or seriously harming any domestic industries.

The construction of a sufficient number of modern war ships and of their necessary armament should progress as rapidly as is consistent with care and perfection in plans and workmanship. The spirit, courage, and skill of our naval officers and seamen have many times in our history given to weak ships and inefficient guns a rating greatly beyond that of the naval list. That they will again do so upon occasion I do not doubt; but they ought not, by premeditation or neglect, to be left to the risks and exigencies of an unequal combat. We should encourage the establishment of American steamship lines. The exchanges of commerce demand stated, reliable, and rapid means of communication, and until these are provided the development of our trade with the States lying south of us is impossible.

The construction of enough modern warships and their necessary weapons should move forward as quickly as possible while still ensuring careful planning and high-quality workmanship. Throughout our history, the spirit, bravery, and skill of our naval officers and sailors have often allowed underpowered ships and ineffective weapons to perform far better than expected. I have no doubt they will do so again when needed; however, we should not intentionally or carelessly leave them at risk in unfair battles. We need to promote the creation of American steamship lines. The demands of commerce require reliable and fast communication channels, and until these are in place, we cannot develop our trade with the countries to the south of us.

Our pension laws should give more adequate and discriminating relief to the Union soldiers and sailors and to their widows and orphans. Such occasions as this should remind us that we owe everything to their valor and sacrifice.

Our pension laws should provide better and more thoughtful support to Union soldiers, sailors, and their widows and orphans. Moments like this remind us that we owe everything to their bravery and sacrifice.

It is a subject of congratulation that there is a near prospect of the admission into the Union of the Dakotas and Montana and Washington Territories. This act of justice has been unreasonably delayed in the case of some of them. The people who have settled these Territories are intelligent, enterprising, and patriotic, and the accession these new States will add strength to the nation. It is due to the settlers in the Territories who have availed themselves of the invitations of our land laws to make homes upon the public domain that their titles should be speedily adjusted and their honest entries confirmed by patent.

It’s a great reason to celebrate that we’re close to admitting the Dakotas, Montana, and Washington Territories into the Union. This act of justice has been unfairly delayed for some of them. The people who have settled in these Territories are smart, driven, and patriotic, and adding these new States will strengthen the nation. It’s important that the settlers in the Territories, who have taken advantage of our land laws to create homes on public land, have their titles quickly resolved and their legitimate claims confirmed by patent.

It is very gratifying to observe the general interest now being manifested in the reform of our election laws. Those who have been for years calling attention to the pressing necessity of throwing about the ballot box and about the elector further safeguards, in order that our elections might not only be free and pure, but might clearly appear to be so, will welcome the accession of any who did not so soon discover the need of reform. The National Congress has not as yet taken control of elections in that case over which the Constitution gives it jurisdiction, but has accepted and adopted the election laws of the several States, provided penalties for their violation and a method of supervision. Only the inefficiency of the State laws or an unfair partisan administration of them could suggest a departure from this policy.

It’s really satisfying to see the growing interest in the reform of our election laws. Those who have been highlighting the urgent need for better protections around the ballot box and the voter—so that our elections can not only be free and fair but also appear that way—will be happy to welcome anyone who has come to realize the need for change. The National Congress hasn’t yet taken control of elections that the Constitution allows it to oversee but has accepted and adopted the election laws from the various States, established penalties for violations, and set up a system for monitoring them. Only the ineffectiveness of the State laws or an unfair, partisan application of those laws could suggest moving away from this approach.

It was clearly, however, in the contemplation of the framers of the Constitution that such an exigency might arise, and provision was wisely made for it. The freedom of the ballot is a condition of our national life, and no power vested in Congress or in the Executive to secure or perpetuate it should remain unused upon occasion. The people of all the Congressional districts have an equal interest that the election in each shall truly express the views and wishes of a majority of the qualified electors residing within it. The results of such elections are not local, and the insistence of electors residing in other districts that they shall be pure and free does not savor at all of impertinence.

It was clear, however, that the framers of the Constitution anticipated that such a situation might arise, and they wisely made provisions for it. The freedom of voting is essential to our national existence, and no power granted to Congress or the Executive to protect or maintain it should go unused when needed. The people in all Congressional districts have an equal stake in ensuring that the elections in each district genuinely reflect the opinions and desires of the majority of qualified voters living there. The outcomes of these elections are not just local, and the insistence of voters from other districts that they be fair and free is not at all disrespectful.

If in any of the States the public security is thought to be threatened by ignorance among the electors, the obvious remedy is education. The sympathy and help of our people will not be withheld from any community struggling with special embarrassments or difficulties connected with the suffrage if the remedies proposed proceed upon lawful lines and are promoted by just and honorable methods. How shall those who practice election frauds recover that respect for the sanctity of the ballot which is the first condition and obligation of good citizenship? The man who has come to regard the ballot box as a juggler's hat has renounced his allegiance.

If in any of the States public safety is thought to be at risk due to voter ignorance, the obvious solution is education. Our community will extend support and assistance to any group facing specific challenges related to voting, as long as the proposed solutions are legal and carried out in fair and honorable ways. How can those who commit election fraud regain respect for the sanctity of the ballot, which is the fundamental requirement of good citizenship? A person who sees the ballot box as just a trickster’s prop has given up their loyalty.

Let us exalt patriotism and moderate our party contentions. Let those who would die for the flag on the field of battle give a better proof of their patriotism and a higher glory to their country by promoting fraternity and justice. A party success that is achieved by unfair methods or by practices that partake of revolution is hurtful and evanescent even from a party standpoint. We should hold our differing opinions in mutual respect, and, having submitted them to the arbitrament of the ballot, should accept an adverse judgment with the same respect that we would have demanded of our opponents if the decision had been in our favor.

Let’s celebrate patriotism and tone down our political disagreements. Those who would fight for the flag on the battlefield should show their patriotism and bring more honor to their country by fostering brotherhood and fairness. A political win achieved through unfair tactics or revolutionary practices is damaging and fleeting, even from a party perspective. We should respect each other’s differing views and, after putting them to a vote, accept the outcome with the same respect we would expect from our opponents if we had won.

No other people have a government more worthy of their respect and love or a land so magnificent in extent, so pleasant to look upon, and so full of generous suggestion to enterprise and labor. God has placed upon our head a diadem and has laid at our feet power and wealth beyond definition or calculation. But we must not forget that we take these gifts upon the condition that justice and mercy shall hold the reins of power and that the upward avenues of hope shall be free to all the people.

No other people have a government more deserving of their respect and love, or a land so vast, beautiful, and full of opportunities for effort and hard work. God has blessed us with a crown and has given us power and wealth beyond measure. But we must remember that we receive these gifts on the condition that justice and mercy guide our power and that the paths of hope are open to everyone.

I do not mistrust the future. Dangers have been in frequent ambush along our path, but we have uncovered and vanquished them all. Passion has swept some of our communities, but only to give us a new demonstration that the great body of our people are stable, patriotic, and law-abiding. No political party can long pursue advantage at the expense of public honor or by rude and indecent methods without protest and fatal disaffection in its own body. The peaceful agencies of commerce are more fully revealing the necessary unity of all our communities, and the increasing intercourse of our people is promoting mutual respect. We shall find unalloyed pleasure in the revelation which our next census will make of the swift development of the great resources of some of the States. Each State will bring its generous contribution to the great aggregate of the nation's increase. And when the harvests from the fields, the cattle from the hills, and the ores of the earth shall have been weighed, counted, and valued, we will turn from them all to crown with the highest honor the State that has most promoted education, virtue, justice, and patriotism among its people.

I don't distrust the future. We’ve faced many dangers along the way, but we’ve uncovered and overcome them all. While some of our communities have been swept up by passion, this has only shown us that the majority of our people are stable, patriotic, and law-abiding. No political party can maintain an advantage at the cost of public honor or through rude and indecent methods without facing backlash and serious discontent from its own members. The peaceful processes of commerce are clearly showing the necessary unity among all our communities, and the growing interactions among our people are fostering mutual respect. We will take great pleasure in the insights our next census will reveal about the rapid growth of some states' resources. Each state will contribute its share to the overall growth of the nation. And when we assess the yields from the fields, the cattle from the hills, and the minerals from the earth, we will set aside everything to honor the state that has done the most to promote education, virtue, justice, and patriotism among its people.






GROVER CLEVELAND, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1893

[Transcriber's note: A light snowfall the night before the inauguration discouraged many spectators from attending President Cleveland's second inauguration. The Democrat had decisively defeated President Harrison in the election of 1892. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The inaugural ball at the Pension Building featured the new invention of electric lights.]

[Transcriber's note: A light snowfall the night before the inauguration discouraged many spectators from attending President Cleveland's second inauguration. The Democrat had decisively defeated President Harrison in the election of 1892. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The inaugural ball at the Pension Building featured the new invention of electric lights.]


My Fellow-Citizens:

My fellow citizens:

In obedience of the mandate of my countrymen I am about to dedicate myself to their service under the sanction of a solemn oath. Deeply moved by the expression of confidence and personal attachment which has called me to this service, I am sure my gratitude can make no better return than the pledge I now give before God and these witnesses of unreserved and complete devotion to the interests and welfare of those who have honored me.

In accordance with the wishes of my fellow citizens, I am about to commit myself to their service under a serious oath. Touched by the trust and personal connection that has led me to this role, I believe my gratitude can best be expressed through the promise I make now, before God and these witnesses, of my unwavering and full dedication to the interests and well-being of those who have honored me.

I deem it fitting on this occasion, while indicating the opinion I hold concerning public questions of present importance, to also briefly refer to the existence of certain conditions and tendencies among our people which seem to menace the integrity and usefulness of their Government.

I think it's appropriate on this occasion, while sharing my views on current important public issues, to also briefly mention some conditions and trends among our people that seem to threaten the integrity and effectiveness of their Government.

While every American citizen must contemplate with the utmost pride and enthusiasm the growth and expansion of our country, the sufficiency of our institutions to stand against the rudest shocks of violence, the wonderful thrift and enterprise of our people, and the demonstrated superiority of our free government, it behooves us to constantly watch for every symptom of insidious infirmity that threatens our national vigor.

While every American citizen should take great pride and excitement in the growth and expansion of our country, the ability of our institutions to withstand the harshest shocks of violence, the remarkable resourcefulness and entrepreneurship of our people, and the proven strength of our free government, we must also be vigilant for any signs of hidden weaknesses that could threaten our national strength.

The strong man who in the confidence of sturdy health courts the sternest activities of life and rejoices in the hardihood of constant labor may still have lurking near his vitals the unheeded disease that dooms him to sudden collapse.

The strong man who, feeling confident in his robust health, engages in the toughest activities of life and takes pride in the toughness of continuous work may still have an unnoticed illness that could lead to his sudden downfall.

It can not be doubted that our stupendous achievements as a people and our country's robust strength have given rise to heedlessness of those laws governing our national health which we can no more evade than human life can escape the laws of God and nature.

It’s undeniable that our incredible achievements as a society and our country’s strong position have led to a disregard for the laws that ensure our national well-being, which we can no more ignore than human life can escape the laws of God and nature.

Manifestly nothing is more vital to our supremacy as a nation and to the beneficent purposes of our Government than a sound and stable currency. Its exposure to degradation should at once arouse to activity the most enlightened statesmanship, and the danger of depreciation in the purchasing power of the wages paid to toil should furnish the strongest incentive to prompt and conservative precaution.

Clearly, nothing is more important to our strength as a nation and to the positive goals of our Government than a reliable and stable currency. Its risk of decline should immediately motivate the most informed leadership, and the threat of reduced purchasing power for wages should provide the strongest motivation for quick and careful action.

In dealing with our present embarrassing situation as related to this subject we will be wise if we temper our confidence and faith in our national strength and resources with the frank concession that even these will not permit us to defy with impunity the inexorable laws of finance and trade. At the same time, in our efforts to adjust differences of opinion we should be free from intolerance or passion, and our judgments should be unmoved by alluring phrases and unvexed by selfish interests.

In addressing our current awkward situation regarding this topic, it would be smart for us to balance our confidence and belief in our national strength and resources with the honest recognition that even these won't allow us to ignore the unyielding laws of finance and trade without consequences. At the same time, while we strive to resolve differing opinions, we should remain free from intolerance or strong emotions, and our judgments should not be swayed by enticing words or influenced by selfish interests.

I am confident that such an approach to the subject will result in prudent and effective remedial legislation. In the meantime, so far as the executive branch of the Government can intervene, none of the powers with which it is invested will be withheld when their exercise is deemed necessary to maintain our national credit or avert financial disaster.

I believe that this approach to the subject will lead to sensible and effective laws to address the issue. In the meantime, the executive branch of the Government won't hold back any of its powers when they are needed to protect our national credit or prevent a financial crisis.

Closely related to the exaggerated confidence in our country's greatness which tends to a disregard of the rules of national safety, another danger confronts us not less serious. I refer to the prevalence of a popular disposition to expect from the operation of the Government especial and direct individual advantages.

Closely related to the overconfidence in our country's greatness, which often leads to neglecting the rules of national safety, another serious danger is facing us. I'm talking about the widespread attitude that expects the government to provide specific and direct personal benefits.

The verdict of our voters which condemned the injustice of maintaining protection for protection's sake enjoins upon the people's servants the duty of exposing and destroying the brood of kindred evils which are the unwholesome progeny of paternalism. This is the bane of republican institutions and the constant peril of our government by the people. It degrades to the purposes of wily craft the plan of rule our fathers established and bequeathed to us as an object of our love and veneration. It perverts the patriotic sentiments of our countrymen and tempts them to pitiful calculation of the sordid gain to be derived from their Government's maintenance. It undermines the self-reliance of our people and substitutes in its place dependence upon governmental favoritism. It stifles the spirit of true Americanism and stupefies every ennobling trait of American citizenship.

The decision of our voters, which denounced the unfairness of keeping protections just for the sake of having them, compels public servants to reveal and eliminate the cluster of related issues that arise from paternalism. This is a threat to republican principles and a constant danger to our government by the people. It twists the governance framework that our founders created and handed down to us as something to cherish and respect. It distorts the patriotic feelings of our citizens and encourages them to think about the petty profits they can gain from the support of their government. It weakens the independence of our people, replacing it with reliance on government favoritism. It suppresses the spirit of true Americanism and dulls every noble quality of American citizenship.

The lessons of paternalism ought to be unlearned and the better lesson taught that while the people should patriotically and cheerfully support their Government its functions do not include the support of the people.

The lessons of paternalism should be unlearned, and the better lesson should be taught that while people should support their government patriotically and cheerfully, the government’s functions do not include supporting the people.

The acceptance of this principle leads to a refusal of bounties and subsidies, which burden the labor and thrift of a portion of our citizens to aid ill-advised or languishing enterprises in which they have no concern. It leads also to a challenge of wild and reckless pension expenditure, which overleaps the bounds of grateful recognition of patriotic service and prostitutes to vicious uses the people's prompt and generous impulse to aid those disabled in their country's defense.

The acceptance of this principle results in rejecting bounties and subsidies that put a strain on the hard work and savings of some citizens to support poorly thought-out or struggling businesses they are not involved in. It also calls into question irresponsible and excessive pension spending, which goes beyond showing appreciation for patriotic service and misuses the public’s willingness to support those who have been injured while defending their country.

Every thoughtful American must realize the importance of checking at its beginning any tendency in public or private station to regard frugality and economy as virtues which we may safely outgrow. The toleration of this idea results in the waste of the people's money by their chosen servants and encourages prodigality and extravagance in the home life of our countrymen.

Every aware American needs to understand how important it is to address right from the start any push in public or private life to see frugality and thriftiness as virtues we can simply leave behind. Accepting this idea leads to wasting taxpayers' money by their elected officials and promotes wastefulness and excess in the everyday lives of our fellow citizens.

Under our scheme of government the waste of public money is a crime against the citizen, and the contempt of our people for economy and frugality in their personal affairs deplorably saps the strength and sturdiness of our national character.

Under our government system, wasting public money is a crime against the citizens, and the disregard our people show for saving and being frugal in their personal finances sadly undermines the strength and resilience of our national character.

It is a plain dictate of honesty and good government that public expenditures should be limited by public necessity, and that this should be measured by the rules of strict economy; and it is equally clear that frugality among the people is the best guaranty of a contented and strong support of free institutions.

It’s a straightforward principle of honesty and good governance that public spending should be restricted by what the public truly needs, and that should be evaluated through strict economic measures; it’s also clear that being frugal helps ensure a satisfied and strong backing for free institutions.

One mode of the misappropriation of public funds is avoided when appointments to office, instead of being the rewards of partisan activity, are awarded to those whose efficiency promises a fair return of work for the compensation paid to them. To secure the fitness and competency of appointees to office and remove from political action the demoralizing madness for spoils, civil-service reform has found a place in our public policy and laws. The benefits already gained through this instrumentality and the further usefulness it promises entitle it to the hearty support and encouragement of all who desire to see our public service well performed or who hope for the elevation of political sentiment and the purification of political methods.

One way to prevent the misuse of public funds is by ensuring that job appointments are based on efficiency rather than partisan loyalty. This means awarding positions to those who can deliver a fair amount of work for the salary they receive. To ensure that appointees are qualified and to eliminate the toxic obsession with political rewards, civil-service reform has become an essential part of our public policy and laws. The advantages we've already seen from this approach, along with the potential benefits it promises, deserve the strong support and encouragement of everyone who wants our public service to be effective or who aims for improved political values and cleaner political practices.

The existence of immense aggregations of kindred enterprises and combinations of business interests formed for the purpose of limiting production and fixing prices is inconsistent with the fair field which ought to be open to every independent activity. Legitimate strife in business should not be superseded by an enforced concession to the demands of combinations that have the power to destroy, nor should the people to be served lose the benefit of cheapness which usually results from wholesome competition. These aggregations and combinations frequently constitute conspiracies against the interests of the people, and in all their phases they are unnatural and opposed to our American sense of fairness. To the extent that they can be reached and restrained by Federal power the General Government should relieve our citizens from their interference and exactions.

The existence of large groups of related businesses and partnerships formed to limit production and set prices goes against the fair competition that should be available to every independent entity. Legitimate competition in business shouldn’t be replaced by forced agreements that cater to the demands of those with the power to eliminate competition, nor should the public lose the benefits of lower prices that typically come from healthy competition. These groups often act against the interests of the public, and in all their forms, they are unnatural and contrary to our American sense of fairness. To the extent that they can be controlled and restricted by federal authority, the federal government should protect our citizens from their interference and demands.

Loyalty to the principles upon which our Government rests positively demands that the equality before the law which it guarantees to every citizen should be justly and in good faith conceded in all parts of the land. The enjoyment of this right follows the badge of citizenship wherever found, and, unimpaired by race or color, it appeals for recognition to American manliness and fairness.

Loyalty to the principles that our Government is built on requires that the equality before the law it guarantees to every citizen must be fairly and sincerely granted everywhere in the country. This right comes with being a citizen, and regardless of race or color, it calls for recognition of American dignity and fairness.

Our relations with the Indians located within our border impose upon us responsibilities we can not escape. Humanity and consistency require us to treat them with forbearance and in our dealings with them to honestly and considerately regard their rights and interests. Every effort should be made to lead them, through the paths of civilization and education, to self-supporting and independent citizenship. In the meantime, as the nation's wards, they should be promptly defended against the cupidity of designing men and shielded from every influence or temptation that retards their advancement.

Our relationships with the Native Americans within our borders bring responsibilities we can't ignore. It's essential that we treat them with patience and genuinely consider their rights and interests in our interactions. We should do everything we can to guide them toward self-sufficient and independent citizenship through civilization and education. In the meantime, as wards of the nation, they should be swiftly protected from the greed of exploitative individuals and shielded from any influences or temptations that hinder their progress.

The people of the United States have decreed that on this day the control of their Government in its legislative and executive branches shall be given to a political party pledged in the most positive terms to the accomplishment of tariff reform. They have thus determined in favor of a more just and equitable system of Federal taxation. The agents they have chosen to carry out their purposes are bound by their promises not less than by the command of their masters to devote themselves unremittingly to this service.

The people of the United States have decided that today the control of their government, both in its legislative and executive branches, will be handed over to a political party that is firmly committed to achieving tariff reform. They have chosen this path in support of a fairer and more equitable system of federal taxation. The representatives they have selected to fulfill this mission are bound by their promises just as much as by the orders of the people to dedicate themselves entirely to this cause.

While there should be no surrender of principle, our task must be undertaken wisely and without heedless vindictiveness. Our mission is not punishment, but the rectification of wrong. If in lifting burdens from the daily life of our people we reduce inordinate and unequal advantages too long enjoyed, this is but a necessary incident of our return to right and justice. If we exact from unwilling minds acquiescence in the theory of an honest distribution of the fund of the governmental beneficence treasured up for all, we but insist upon a principle which underlies our free institutions. When we tear aside the delusions and misconceptions which have blinded our countrymen to their condition under vicious tariff laws, we but show them how far they have been led away from the paths of contentment and prosperity. When we proclaim that the necessity for revenue to support the Government furnishes the only justification for taxing the people, we announce a truth so plain that its denial would seem to indicate the extent to which judgment may be influenced by familiarity with perversions of the taxing power. And when we seek to reinstate the self-confidence and business enterprise of our citizens by discrediting an abject dependence upon governmental favor, we strive to stimulate those elements of American character which support the hope of American achievement.

While we should never compromise our principles, we need to approach our task wisely and without unnecessary spite. Our goal isn't to punish but to correct injustices. If, by easing the burdens of our people's daily lives, we also reduce the excessive and unequal advantages that have been enjoyed for too long, that's just a necessary part of restoring fairness and justice. When we insist that everyone should agree to the fair distribution of government support that is meant for all, we are upholding a principle that is fundamental to our free society. By exposing the illusions and misunderstandings that have kept our citizens unaware of their situation under harmful tariff laws, we reveal how far they have strayed from true contentment and prosperity. When we declare that the need for revenue to support the government is the only valid reason for taxing the people, we're stating a truth so obvious that denying it suggests how much one might be misled by distortions of taxing authority. And when we aim to restore the self-confidence and entrepreneurial spirit of our citizens by challenging their dependence on government assistance, we are trying to encourage the qualities within American character that foster the hope for American success.

Anxiety for the redemption of the pledges which my party has made and solicitude for the complete justification of the trust the people have reposed in us constrain me to remind those with whom I am to cooperate that we can succeed in doing the work which has been especially set before us only by the most sincere, harmonious, and disinterested effort. Even if insuperable obstacles and opposition prevent the consummation of our task, we shall hardly be excused; and if failure can be traced to our fault or neglect we may be sure the people will hold us to a swift and exacting accountability.

Worrying about fulfilling the promises my party has made and wanting to fully justify the trust the people have placed in us compel me to remind those I’m working with that we can only succeed in the important work ahead of us through genuine, collaborative, and selfless effort. Even if we face unbeatable challenges and opposition that stop us from completing our mission, we won’t be easily excused; if our failure results from our mistakes or lack of effort, we can be sure the people will hold us accountable quickly and firmly.

The oath I now take to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States not only impressively defines the great responsibility I assume, but suggests obedience to constitutional commands as the rule by which my official conduct must be guided. I shall to the best of my ability and within my sphere of duty preserve the Constitution by loyally protecting every grant of Federal power it contains, by defending all its restraints when attacked by impatience and restlessness, and by enforcing its limitations and reservations in favor of the States and the people.

The oath I’m taking to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States clearly outlines the significant responsibility I’m accepting. It also indicates that I must follow constitutional rules as the guide for my official actions. I will do my best, within my responsibilities, to uphold the Constitution by faithfully protecting every Federal power it grants, defending all its limits when challenged by impatience and unrest, and enforcing its restrictions in favor of the States and the people.

Fully impressed with the gravity of the duties that confront me and mindful of my weakness, I should be appalled if it were my lot to bear unaided the responsibilities which await me. I am, however, saved from discouragement when I remember that I shall have the support and the counsel and cooperation of wise and patriotic men who will stand at my side in Cabinet places or will represent the people in their legislative halls.

I fully recognize the seriousness of the responsibilities ahead of me, and knowing my own limitations, I would be overwhelmed if I had to face these challenges alone. However, I feel encouraged when I remember that I will have the support, advice, and teamwork of knowledgeable and dedicated individuals who will be by my side in the Cabinet or represent the people in their legislative chambers.

I find also much comfort in remembering that my countrymen are just and generous and in the assurance that they will not condemn those who by sincere devotion to their service deserve their forbearance and approval.

I also take a lot of comfort in knowing that my fellow countrymen are fair and generous, and in the belief that they won’t judge those who, through their genuine dedication to serving them, deserve their patience and support.

Above all, I know there is a Supreme Being who rules the affairs of men and whose goodness and mercy have always followed the American people, and I know He will not turn from us now if we humbly and reverently seek His powerful aid.

Above all, I believe there is a higher power that oversees the lives of people and whose kindness and compassion have always been with the American people. I trust that He will not abandon us now if we earnestly and respectfully ask for His help.






WILLIAM MCKINLEY FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 1897

[Transcriber's note: A Civil War officer, and a Governor and Congressman from Ohio, Mr. McKinley took the oath on a platform erected on the north East Front steps at the Capitol. It was administered by Chief Justice Melville Fuller. The Republican had defeated Democrat William Jennings Bryan on the issue of the gold standard in the currency. Thomas Edison's new motion picture camera captured the events, and his gramophone recorded the address. The inaugural ball was held in the Pension Building.]

[Transcriber's note: A Civil War officer and a Governor and Congressman from Ohio, Mr. McKinley took the oath on a platform set up on the Northeast Front steps at the Capitol. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath. The Republican candidate defeated Democrat William Jennings Bryan over the gold standard in the currency. Thomas Edison's new motion picture camera recorded the events, while his gramophone captured the address. The inaugural ball took place in the Pension Building.]


Fellow-Citizens:

Fellow Citizens:

In obedience to the will of the people, and in their presence, by the authority vested in me by this oath, I assume the arduous and responsible duties of President of the United States, relying upon the support of my countrymen and invoking the guidance of Almighty God. Our faith teaches that there is no safer reliance than upon the God of our fathers, who has so singularly favored the American people in every national trial, and who will not forsake us so long as we obey His commandments and walk humbly in His footsteps.

In line with the will of the people, and with them watching, I take on the challenging and responsible role of President of the United States, counting on the support of my fellow citizens and seeking the guidance of Almighty God. Our belief teaches that there's no better support than the God of our ancestors, who has uniquely favored the American people through every national challenge, and who will not abandon us as long as we follow His commandments and live humbly in His ways.

The responsibilities of the high trust to which I have been called—always of grave importance—are augmented by the prevailing business conditions entailing idleness upon willing labor and loss to useful enterprises. The country is suffering from industrial disturbances from which speedy relief must be had. Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be threatened. It should all be put upon an enduring basis, not subject to easy attack, nor its stability to doubt or dispute. Our currency should continue under the supervision of the Government. The several forms of our paper money offer, in my judgment, a constant embarrassment to the Government and a safe balance in the Treasury. Therefore I believe it necessary to devise a system which, without diminishing the circulating medium or offering a premium for its contraction, will present a remedy for those arrangements which, temporary in their nature, might well in the years of our prosperity have been displaced by wiser provisions. With adequate revenue secured, but not until then, we can enter upon such changes in our fiscal laws as will, while insuring safety and volume to our money, no longer impose upon the Government the necessity of maintaining so large a gold reserve, with its attendant and inevitable temptations to speculation. Most of our financial laws are the outgrowth of experience and trial, and should not be amended without investigation and demonstration of the wisdom of the proposed changes. We must be both "sure we are right" and "make haste slowly." If, therefore, Congress, in its wisdom, shall deem it expedient to create a commission to take under early consideration the revision of our coinage, banking and currency laws, and give them that exhaustive, careful and dispassionate examination that their importance demands, I shall cordially concur in such action. If such power is vested in the President, it is my purpose to appoint a commission of prominent, well-informed citizens of different parties, who will command public confidence, both on account of their ability and special fitness for the work. Business experience and public training may thus be combined, and the patriotic zeal of the friends of the country be so directed that such a report will be made as to receive the support of all parties, and our finances cease to be the subject of mere partisan contention. The experiment is, at all events, worth a trial, and, in my opinion, it can but prove beneficial to the entire country.

The responsibilities of the high position I’ve been called to—always significant—are made even more pressing by the current business climate, which is causing willing workers to be idle and resulting in losses for valuable enterprises. The country is facing industrial unrest that needs quick resolution. Our financial system requires some updates; our currency is sound right now, but its value must not be further jeopardized. It should be established on a solid foundation that isn’t easily attacked, and whose stability isn’t open to doubt or debate. Our currency should remain under government oversight. The various types of our paper money create, in my view, ongoing complications for the government and an unstable balance in the Treasury. Consequently, I believe we need to create a system that, without reducing the money supply or encouraging its decrease, will provide a solution to those temporary arrangements that should have been replaced by better measures during our prosperous years. Only once we have secured sufficient revenue can we begin changing our financial laws in a way that ensures the safety and volume of our money, while relieving the government of the burden of maintaining such a large gold reserve, which invites speculation. Most of our financial laws are based on experience and trial, and they shouldn't be changed without careful investigation and proof of the proposed revisions’ wisdom. We must be both "sure we are right" and "make haste slowly." If Congress believes it is wise to set up a commission to promptly review our coinage, banking, and currency laws, and to give them the thorough and unbiased examination their significance deserves, I would fully support such action. If this power is granted to the President, I intend to appoint a commission made up of respected, knowledgeable citizens from various parties, who will earn public trust due to their competence and qualifications for this task. By combining business experience with public service, we can direct the patriotic enthusiasm of the country’s supporters in a way that leads to a report gaining support from all sides, ensuring our finances stop being a matter of mere partisan struggle. This experiment is certainly worth trying, and I believe it can only be beneficial to the entire nation.

The question of international bimetallism will have early and earnest attention. It will be my constant endeavor to secure it by co-operation with the other great commercial powers of the world. Until that condition is realized when the parity between our gold and silver money springs from and is supported by the relative value of the two metals, the value of the silver already coined and of that which may hereafter be coined, must be kept constantly at par with gold by every resource at our command. The credit of the Government, the integrity of its currency, and the inviolability of its obligations must be preserved. This was the commanding verdict of the people, and it will not be unheeded.

The issue of international bimetallism will receive immediate and serious attention. I will consistently strive to achieve it by working together with other major commercial powers worldwide. Until we reach a point where the value of our gold and silver money is based on and supported by the relative worth of the two metals, the value of the silver that has already been minted, as well as any that will be minted in the future, must be kept equal to gold by every means at our disposal. The government’s credit, the integrity of its currency, and the inviolability of its commitments must be upheld. This was the decisive opinion of the people, and it will not be ignored.

Economy is demanded in every branch of the Government at all times, but especially in periods, like the present, of depression in business and distress among the people. The severest economy must be observed in all public expenditures, and extravagance stopped wherever it is found, and prevented wherever in the future it may be developed. If the revenues are to remain as now, the only relief that can come must be from decreased expenditures. But the present must not become the permanent condition of the Government. It has been our uniform practice to retire, not increase our outstanding obligations, and this policy must again be resumed and vigorously enforced. Our revenues should always be large enough to meet with ease and promptness not only our current needs and the principal and interest of the public debt, but to make proper and liberal provision for that most deserving body of public creditors, the soldiers and sailors and the widows and orphans who are the pensioners of the United States.

The government needs to be frugal in every area at all times, but especially during tough times like now when the economy is struggling and people are suffering. We must keep a tight grip on all public spending, cut out waste wherever we find it, and prevent it from happening again in the future. If our revenue stays the same as it is now, the only way to find relief is by reducing our expenses. However, the current situation can’t be the new normal for the government. We have consistently aimed to reduce, not increase, our outstanding debts, and we need to stick to that approach and enforce it strongly. Our revenue should always be sufficient to cover not just our immediate needs and the principal and interest on public debt, but also to provide proper and generous support for our most deserving public creditors: the soldiers, sailors, and the widows and orphans who rely on pensions from the United States.

The Government should not be permitted to run behind or increase its debt in times like the present. Suitably to provide against this is the mandate of duty—the certain and easy remedy for most of our financial difficulties. A deficiency is inevitable so long as the expenditures of the Government exceed its receipts. It can only be met by loans or an increased revenue. While a large annual surplus of revenue may invite waste and extravagance, inadequate revenue creates distrust and undermines public and private credit. Neither should be encouraged. Between more loans and more revenue there ought to be but one opinion. We should have more revenue, and that without delay, hindrance, or postponement. A surplus in the Treasury created by loans is not a permanent or safe reliance. It will suffice while it lasts, but it can not last long while the outlays of the Government are greater than its receipts, as has been the case during the past two years. Nor must it be forgotten that however much such loans may temporarily relieve the situation, the Government is still indebted for the amount of the surplus thus accrued, which it must ultimately pay, while its ability to pay is not strengthened, but weakened by a continued deficit. Loans are imperative in great emergencies to preserve the Government or its credit, but a failure to supply needed revenue in time of peace for the maintenance of either has no justification.

The government shouldn’t be allowed to run up its debt or increase it during times like these. It's our duty to prevent this — that’s the straightforward solution to many of our financial problems. A shortfall is unavoidable as long as government spending exceeds its income. This can only be addressed through loans or higher revenue. While a large annual surplus might encourage wastefulness, insufficient revenue leads to distrust and weakens both public and private credit. Neither of these situations should be tolerated. When it comes to borrowing more versus boosting revenue, there should be only one view: we need to increase revenue without delay or obstacles. A surplus in the treasury created by loans isn’t a lasting or safe solution. It may work for a while, but it won’t last long if government expenditures continue to outpace receipts, as we’ve seen over the last two years. Additionally, we shouldn’t forget that, no matter how much these loans may temporarily improve the situation, the government still owes the amount of that surplus, which it must eventually pay back, and its ability to do so is weakened, not strengthened, by ongoing deficits. Loans are essential in major emergencies to protect the government or its credibility, but failing to generate necessary revenue in peacetime for maintaining either is unjustifiable.

The best way for the Government to maintain its credit is to pay as it goes—not by resorting to loans, but by keeping out of debt—through an adequate income secured by a system of taxation, external or internal, or both. It is the settled policy of the Government, pursued from the beginning and practiced by all parties and Administrations, to raise the bulk of our revenue from taxes upon foreign productions entering the United States for sale and consumption, and avoiding, for the most part, every form of direct taxation, except in time of war. The country is clearly opposed to any needless additions to the subject of internal taxation, and is committed by its latest popular utterance to the system of tariff taxation. There can be no misunderstanding, either, about the principle upon which this tariff taxation shall be levied. Nothing has ever been made plainer at a general election than that the controlling principle in the raising of revenue from duties on imports is zealous care for American interests and American labor. The people have declared that such legislation should be had as will give ample protection and encouragement to the industries and the development of our country. It is, therefore, earnestly hoped and expected that Congress will, at the earliest practicable moment, enact revenue legislation that shall be fair, reasonable, conservative, and just, and which, while supplying sufficient revenue for public purposes, will still be signally beneficial and helpful to every section and every enterprise of the people. To this policy we are all, of whatever party, firmly bound by the voice of the people—a power vastly more potential than the expression of any political platform. The paramount duty of Congress is to stop deficiencies by the restoration of that protective legislation which has always been the firmest prop of the Treasury. The passage of such a law or laws would strengthen the credit of the Government both at home and abroad, and go far toward stopping the drain upon the gold reserve held for the redemption of our currency, which has been heavy and well-nigh constant for several years.

The best way for the government to maintain its credit is to pay as it goes—not by taking out loans, but by staying out of debt—through sufficient income generated by a system of taxation, whether external or internal, or a combination of both. It has been the established policy of the government, followed from the start and practiced by all parties and administrations, to raise most of our revenue from taxes on foreign products coming into the United States for sale and consumption, generally avoiding direct taxation except during wartime. The country clearly opposes any unnecessary increases in internal taxation and is committed, as shown by its recent popular statements, to a system of tariff taxation. There is also no confusion about the principle under which this tariff taxation will be applied. Nothing has ever been more clearly expressed during an election than the idea that the main principle for raising revenue from import duties is a strong concern for American interests and American labor. The people have stated that legislation should be enacted to provide ample protection and support for the industries and growth of our country. Therefore, it is sincerely hoped and expected that Congress will, as soon as practical, pass revenue legislation that is fair, reasonable, conservative, and just, which will supply enough revenue for public purposes while still being highly beneficial and supportive of every region and every business of the people. We are all, regardless of our political affiliation, firmly committed to this policy by the voice of the people—a force far more influential than any political platform. The main responsibility of Congress is to eliminate deficits by reinstating protective legislation that has always been the strongest support of the Treasury. Passing such a law or laws would enhance the government's credit both domestically and internationally and significantly help to halt the ongoing drain on the gold reserve held for backing our currency, which has been substantial and nearly constant for several years.

In the revision of the tariff especial attention should be given to the re-enactment and extension of the reciprocity principle of the law of 1890, under which so great a stimulus was given to our foreign trade in new and advantageous markets for our surplus agricultural and manufactured products. The brief trial given this legislation amply justifies a further experiment and additional discretionary power in the making of commercial treaties, the end in view always to be the opening up of new markets for the products of our country, by granting concessions to the products of other lands that we need and cannot produce ourselves, and which do not involve any loss of labor to our own people, but tend to increase their employment.

In updating the tariff, special attention should be paid to re-establishing and expanding the reciprocity principle from the 1890 law, which significantly boosted our foreign trade by opening up new and beneficial markets for our surplus agricultural and manufactured goods. The short trial of this legislation clearly supports trying it again and giving more flexibility in creating commercial treaties, always aiming to open up new markets for our country's products by offering concessions on goods from other countries that we need but cannot produce ourselves, and that won't take away jobs from our people, but instead help increase their employment.

The depression of the past four years has fallen with especial severity upon the great body of toilers of the country, and upon none more than the holders of small farms. Agriculture has languished and labor suffered. The revival of manufacturing will be a relief to both. No portion of our population is more devoted to the institution of free government nor more loyal in their support, while none bears more cheerfully or fully its proper share in the maintenance of the Government or is better entitled to its wise and liberal care and protection. Legislation helpful to producers is beneficial to all. The depressed condition of industry on the farm and in the mine and factory has lessened the ability of the people to meet the demands upon them, and they rightfully expect that not only a system of revenue shall be established that will secure the largest income with the least burden, but that every means will be taken to decrease, rather than increase, our public expenditures. Business conditions are not the most promising. It will take time to restore the prosperity of former years. If we cannot promptly attain it, we can resolutely turn our faces in that direction and aid its return by friendly legislation. However troublesome the situation may appear, Congress will not, I am sure, be found lacking in disposition or ability to relieve it as far as legislation can do so. The restoration of confidence and the revival of business, which men of all parties so much desire, depend more largely upon the prompt, energetic, and intelligent action of Congress than upon any other single agency affecting the situation.

The depression of the past four years has hit the workers of the country especially hard, particularly those who own small farms. Agriculture has struggled, and labor has suffered. A revival in manufacturing will benefit both. No part of our population is more dedicated to the idea of free government or more loyal in their support, and no one bears their fair share in maintaining the government more willingly or fully, nor is anyone more deserving of its wise and generous care and protection. Legislation that helps producers benefits everyone. The depressed state of work on farms, in mines, and factories has made it harder for people to meet their obligations, and they rightfully expect not just a revenue system that generates the maximum income with the least burden, but also that every effort will be made to reduce public spending rather than increase it. Current business conditions are not very encouraging. It will take time to regain the prosperity of previous years. If we can’t achieve it quickly, we can still move in that direction and support its return through supportive legislation. However challenging the situation may seem, I’m confident that Congress will be willing and capable of doing its part through legislation to help ease it. The restoration of confidence and the revival of business that people from all parties desire depends more on the quick, proactive, and smart actions of Congress than on any other single factor impacting the situation.

It is inspiring, too, to remember that no great emergency in the one hundred and eight years of our eventful national life has ever arisen that has not been met with wisdom and courage by the American people, with fidelity to their best interests and highest destiny, and to the honor of the American name. These years of glorious history have exalted mankind and advanced the cause of freedom throughout the world, and immeasurably strengthened the precious free institutions which we enjoy. The people love and will sustain these institutions. The great essential to our happiness and prosperity is that we adhere to the principles upon which the Government was established and insist upon their faithful observance. Equality of rights must prevail, and our laws be always and everywhere respected and obeyed. We may have failed in the discharge of our full duty as citizens of the great Republic, but it is consoling and encouraging to realize that free speech, a free press, free thought, free schools, the free and unmolested right of religious liberty and worship, and free and fair elections are dearer and more universally enjoyed to-day than ever before. These guaranties must be sacredly preserved and wisely strengthened. The constituted authorities must be cheerfully and vigorously upheld. Lynchings must not be tolerated in a great and civilized country like the United States; courts, not mobs, must execute the penalties of the law. The preservation of public order, the right of discussion, the integrity of courts, and the orderly administration of justice must continue forever the rock of safety upon which our Government securely rests.

It's also inspiring to remember that throughout the 108 years of our remarkable national history, every major crisis has been met with wisdom and courage by the American people, showing dedication to their best interests and highest aspirations, as well as to the honor of the American name. These years of glorious history have uplifted humanity and promoted the cause of freedom around the world, significantly strengthening the precious free institutions we enjoy. The people cherish and will support these institutions. The key to our happiness and prosperity is that we stick to the principles on which the Government was founded and ensure they are faithfully upheld. Equality of rights must prevail, and our laws should always be respected and followed. We may have fallen short in fulfilling our full responsibilities as citizens of this great Republic, but it’s reassuring and encouraging to recognize that free speech, a free press, free thought, free schools, the unimpeded right to religious freedom and worship, as well as free and fair elections are more valued and widely enjoyed today than ever before. These guarantees must be carefully preserved and wisely strengthened. The established authorities must be supported enthusiastically and actively. Lynching cannot be tolerated in a great and civilized country like the United States; it should be courts, not mobs, that impose the penalties of the law. Maintaining public order, the right to discuss, the integrity of courts, and the orderly administration of justice must forever be the solid foundation on which our Government securely stands.

One of the lessons taught by the late election, which all can rejoice in, is that the citizens of the United States are both law-respecting and law-abiding people, not easily swerved from the path of patriotism and honor. This is in entire accord with the genius of our institutions, and but emphasizes the advantages of inculcating even a greater love for law and order in the future. Immunity should be granted to none who violate the laws, whether individuals, corporations, or communities; and as the Constitution imposes upon the President the duty of both its own execution, and of the statutes enacted in pursuance of its provisions, I shall endeavor carefully to carry them into effect. The declaration of the party now restored to power has been in the past that of "opposition to all combinations of capital organized in trusts, or otherwise, to control arbitrarily the condition of trade among our citizens," and it has supported "such legislation as will prevent the execution of all schemes to oppress the people by undue charges on their supplies, or by unjust rates for the transportation of their products to the market." This purpose will be steadily pursued, both by the enforcement of the laws now in existence and the recommendation and support of such new statutes as may be necessary to carry it into effect.

One of the lessons from the recent election, which everyone can celebrate, is that the citizens of the United States are respectful of the law and compliant, not easily swayed from the path of patriotism and integrity. This aligns completely with the spirit of our institutions and highlights the need to foster an even greater love for law and order in the future. No one—whether individuals, corporations, or communities—should be exempt from the consequences of breaking the law. The Constitution gives the President the responsibility to enforce it, along with the statutes created to support its provisions, and I will strive to fulfill this duty. The platform of the party now in power has historically been to oppose all forms of capital organized in trusts or otherwise that aim to arbitrarily control trade conditions among our citizens, and it has advocated for legislation that prevents any efforts to exploit the public through excessive prices on goods or unfair transportation rates for their products to market. This goal will be consistently pursued, both by enforcing existing laws and by recommending and supporting any new laws needed to achieve it.

Our naturalization and immigration laws should be further improved to the constant promotion of a safer, a better, and a higher citizenship. A grave peril to the Republic would be a citizenship too ignorant to understand or too vicious to appreciate the great value and beneficence of our institutions and laws, and against all who come here to make war upon them our gates must be promptly and tightly closed. Nor must we be unmindful of the need of improvement among our own citizens, but with the zeal of our forefathers encourage the spread of knowledge and free education. Illiteracy must be banished from the land if we shall attain that high destiny as the foremost of the enlightened nations of the world which, under Providence, we ought to achieve.

Our immigration and naturalization laws need to be improved to continuously promote safer, better, and higher citizenship. A serious threat to the Republic would be a citizenship that is too ignorant to understand or too malicious to appreciate the immense value and benefits of our institutions and laws. We must firmly close our gates against anyone who comes here to wage war on them. We also need to remember the importance of improving our own citizens, and with the passion of our ancestors, we should encourage the spread of knowledge and free education. We must eliminate illiteracy from our country if we want to reach our potential as one of the leading enlightened nations in the world, which, with divine guidance, we should achieve.

Reforms in the civil service must go on; but the changes should be real and genuine, not perfunctory, or prompted by a zeal in behalf of any party simply because it happens to be in power. As a member of Congress I voted and spoke in favor of the present law, and I shall attempt its enforcement in the spirit in which it was enacted. The purpose in view was to secure the most efficient service of the best men who would accept appointment under the Government, retaining faithful and devoted public servants in office, but shielding none, under the authority of any rule or custom, who are inefficient, incompetent, or unworthy. The best interests of the country demand this, and the people heartily approve the law wherever and whenever it has been thus administrated.

Reforms in the civil service need to continue; however, the changes must be genuine and meaningful, not just superficial or driven by a desire to benefit any political party simply because it's in power. As a member of Congress, I voted and spoke in support of the current law, and I will work to enforce it in the spirit it was created. The goal was to ensure the most effective service from the best individuals willing to be appointed by the Government, keeping loyal and dedicated public servants in their roles, but providing no protection for those who are ineffective, incompetent, or undeserving. The best interests of the country require this, and the public fully supports the law wherever and whenever it has been properly enforced.

Congress should give prompt attention to the restoration of our American merchant marine, once the pride of the seas in all the great ocean highways of commerce. To my mind, few more important subjects so imperatively demand its intelligent consideration. The United States has progressed with marvelous rapidity in every field of enterprise and endeavor until we have become foremost in nearly all the great lines of inland trade, commerce, and industry. Yet, while this is true, our American merchant marine has been steadily declining until it is now lower, both in the percentage of tonnage and the number of vessels employed, than it was prior to the Civil War. Commendable progress has been made of late years in the upbuilding of the American Navy, but we must supplement these efforts by providing as a proper consort for it a merchant marine amply sufficient for our own carrying trade to foreign countries. The question is one that appeals both to our business necessities and the patriotic aspirations of a great people.

Congress should quickly focus on restoring our American merchant marine, which was once the pride of the seas in all the major shipping routes of commerce. I believe few topics require its careful consideration more urgently. The United States has progressed incredibly fast in every area of business and activity, and we've become a leader in nearly all the major sectors of domestic trade, commerce, and industry. However, despite this growth, our American merchant marine has been steadily declining, and it's now lower, both in the percentage of tonnage and the number of vessels employed, than it was before the Civil War. Some notable progress has been made in recent years to strengthen the American Navy, but we need to complement these efforts by ensuring we have an adequate merchant marine for our own trade with foreign countries. This issue resonates with both our business needs and the patriotic aspirations of a great nation.

It has been the policy of the United States since the foundation of the Government to cultivate relations of peace and amity with all the nations of the world, and this accords with my conception of our duty now. We have cherished the policy of non-interference with affairs of foreign governments wisely inaugurated by Washington, keeping ourselves free from entanglement, either as allies or foes, content to leave undisturbed with them the settlement of their own domestic concerns. It will be our aim to pursue a firm and dignified foreign policy, which shall be just, impartial, ever watchful of our national honor, and always insisting upon the enforcement of the lawful rights of American citizens everywhere. Our diplomacy should seek nothing more and accept nothing less than is due us. We want no wars of conquest; we must avoid the temptation of territorial aggression. War should never be entered upon until every agency of peace has failed; peace is preferable to war in almost every contingency. Arbitration is the true method of settlement of international as well as local or individual differences. It was recognized as the best means of adjustment of differences between employers and employees by the Forty-ninth Congress, in 1886, and its application was extended to our diplomatic relations by the unanimous concurrence of the Senate and House of the Fifty-first Congress in 1890. The latter resolution was accepted as the basis of negotiations with us by the British House of Commons in 1893, and upon our invitation a treaty of arbitration between the United States and Great Britain was signed at Washington and transmitted to the Senate for its ratification in January last. Since this treaty is clearly the result of our own initiative; since it has been recognized as the leading feature of our foreign policy throughout our entire national history—the adjustment of difficulties by judicial methods rather than force of arms—and since it presents to the world the glorious example of reason and peace, not passion and war, controlling the relations between two of the greatest nations in the world, an example certain to be followed by others, I respectfully urge the early action of the Senate thereon, not merely as a matter of policy, but as a duty to mankind. The importance and moral influence of the ratification of such a treaty can hardly be overestimated in the cause of advancing civilization. It may well engage the best thought of the statesmen and people of every country, and I cannot but consider it fortunate that it was reserved to the United States to have the leadership in so grand a work.

Since the founding of the Government, it has been the policy of the United States to foster peaceful and friendly relations with all nations, and this aligns with my view of our duty now. We have valued the non-interference policy in foreign affairs initiated by Washington, keeping ourselves free from entanglements, whether as allies or enemies, and allowing them to manage their own domestic issues. Our goal is to follow a strong and dignified foreign policy that is just, impartial, vigilant about our national honor, and constantly upholding the lawful rights of American citizens everywhere. Our diplomacy should seek nothing more and accept nothing less than what is owed to us. We do not want wars of conquest; we must resist the urge for territorial expansion. War should only be considered after all peaceful options have been exhausted; peace is preferable to war in almost every situation. Arbitration is the proper way to resolve both international and local or individual disputes. This was acknowledged by the Forty-ninth Congress in 1886 as the best way to resolve differences between employers and employees, and it was extended to our diplomatic relations by the unanimous agreement of the Senate and House of the Fifty-first Congress in 1890. The British House of Commons accepted this resolution as the basis for negotiations with us in 1893, and following our invitation, a treaty of arbitration between the United States and Great Britain was signed in Washington and sent to the Senate for ratification last January. Since this treaty clearly stems from our own initiative and has been recognized as a hallmark of our foreign policy throughout our history—the resolution of disputes through judicial means instead of military force—and since it showcases to the world the noble example of reason and peace, rather than passion and war, governing the relations between two of the world's greatest nations, an example that others are sure to follow, I respectfully urge the Senate to act on it promptly, not just as a matter of policy, but as a duty to humanity. The significance and moral impact of ratifying such a treaty cannot be overstated in the effort to promote civilization. It should capture the attention of the best minds among statesmen and citizens in every country, and I cannot help but see it as fortunate that the United States has been chosen to lead in such a grand endeavor.

It has been the uniform practice of each President to avoid, as far as possible, the convening of Congress in extraordinary session. It is an example which, under ordinary circumstances and in the absence of a public necessity, is to be commended. But a failure to convene the representatives of the people in Congress in extra session when it involves neglect of a public duty places the responsibility of such neglect upon the Executive himself. The condition of the public Treasury, as has been indicated, demands the immediate consideration of Congress. It alone has the power to provide revenues for the Government. Not to convene it under such circumstances I can view in no other sense than the neglect of a plain duty. I do not sympathize with the sentiment that Congress in session is dangerous to our general business interests. Its members are the agents of the people, and their presence at the seat of Government in the execution of the sovereign will should not operate as an injury, but a benefit. There could be no better time to put the Government upon a sound financial and economic basis than now. The people have only recently voted that this should be done, and nothing is more binding upon the agents of their will than the obligation of immediate action. It has always seemed to me that the postponement of the meeting of Congress until more than a year after it has been chosen deprived Congress too often of the inspiration of the popular will and the country of the corresponding benefits. It is evident, therefore, that to postpone action in the presence of so great a necessity would be unwise on the part of the Executive because unjust to the interests of the people. Our action now will be freer from mere partisan consideration than if the question of tariff revision was postponed until the regular session of Congress. We are nearly two years from a Congressional election, and politics cannot so greatly distract us as if such contest was immediately pending. We can approach the problem calmly and patriotically, without fearing its effect upon an early election.

Each President has consistently tried to avoid, whenever possible, calling Congress to an extraordinary session. This practice is commendable under normal circumstances and when there isn’t a public necessity. However, failing to call Congress back into session when it involves neglecting a public duty puts the blame for that neglect on the Executive. As indicated, the state of the public Treasury requires Congress's immediate attention. Only Congress can generate revenue for the Government. Not convening them in such a situation feels like a clear neglect of duty. I don’t agree with the view that having Congress in session is harmful to our overall business interests. Members of Congress are agents of the people, and their presence at the center of government to execute the will of the people should be beneficial, not detrimental. There’s no better time to strengthen the Government’s financial and economic foundation than right now. The people have recently decided that this action is necessary, and nothing is more binding on their representatives than the obligation for immediate action. It has always seemed to me that delaying Congress's meeting for more than a year after it has been elected deprives it too often of the public’s inspiration and the country of the related benefits. Therefore, it would be unwise for the Executive to delay action in the face of such a significant need, as it would be unfair to the people's interests. Our actions now will be less influenced by party politics than if the tariff revision question were postponed to the regular session of Congress. We are almost two years away from the next Congressional election, meaning politics won't distract us as much as if that contest were imminent. We can tackle this problem thoughtfully and patriotically, without worrying about its impact on an upcoming election.

Our fellow-citizens who may disagree with us upon the character of this legislation prefer to have the question settled now, even against their preconceived views, and perhaps settled so reasonably, as I trust and believe it will be, as to insure great permanence, than to have further uncertainty menacing the vast and varied business interests of the United States. Again, whatever action Congress may take will be given a fair opportunity for trial before the people are called to pass judgment upon it, and this I consider a great essential to the rightful and lasting settlement of the question. In view of these considerations, I shall deem it my duty as President to convene Congress in extraordinary session on Monday, the 15th day of March, 1897.

Our fellow citizens who disagree with us about this legislation would rather have the question resolved now, even if it goes against their initial beliefs, and hopefully solved in a way that ensures stability, than face ongoing uncertainty that threatens the diverse business interests of the United States. Furthermore, whatever action Congress decides on will have a fair chance to be tested before the public is asked to judge it, and I see this as essential for a proper and lasting resolution to the issue. Considering all this, I believe it is my duty as President to convene Congress for a special session on Monday, March 15, 1897.

In conclusion, I congratulate the country upon the fraternal spirit of the people and the manifestations of good will everywhere so apparent. The recent election not only most fortunately demonstrated the obliteration of sectional or geographical lines, but to some extent also the prejudices which for years have distracted our councils and marred our true greatness as a nation. The triumph of the people, whose verdict is carried into effect today, is not the triumph of one section, nor wholly of one party, but of all sections and all the people. The North and the South no longer divide on the old lines, but upon principles and policies; and in this fact surely every lover of the country can find cause for true felicitation.

In conclusion, I want to congratulate the country on the brotherly spirit of the people and the clear signs of goodwill everywhere. The recent election not only showed the disappearance of sectional or geographical divides but also, to some degree, the biases that have distracted our discussions and diminished our true greatness as a nation for years. The success of the people, whose decision is being implemented today, is not just the victory of one section or one party, but of all sections and all the people. The North and the South no longer split along the old lines but based on principles and policies; and in this, everyone who loves the country can find a reason to celebrate.

Let us rejoice in and cultivate this spirit; it is ennobling and will be both a gain and a blessing to our beloved country. It will be my constant aim to do nothing, and permit nothing to be done, that will arrest or disturb this growing sentiment of unity and cooperation, this revival of esteem and affiliation which now animates so many thousands in both the old antagonistic sections, but I shall cheerfully do everything possible to promote and increase it.

Let’s celebrate and nurture this spirit; it’s uplifting and will benefit our cherished country. I will always strive to avoid doing anything, or allowing anything to happen, that would hinder or disrupt this increasing feeling of unity and collaboration, this revival of respect and connection that now inspires so many thousands in both formerly opposing regions. I will gladly do everything I can to encourage and enhance it.

Let me again repeat the words of the oath administered by the Chief Justice which, in their respective spheres, so far as applicable, I would have all my countrymen observe: "I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." This is the obligation I have reverently taken before the Lord Most High. To keep it will be my single purpose, my constant prayer; and I shall confidently rely upon the forbearance and assistance of all the people in the discharge of my solemn responsibilities.

Let me repeat the words of the oath given by the Chief Justice, which I would like all my fellow countrymen to follow in their own lives, as much as they can: "I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." This is the commitment I have humbly made before the Most High. Keeping this promise will be my main focus and my ongoing prayer; I will rely on the patience and support of everyone as I carry out my serious responsibilities.






WILLIAM MCKINLEY, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1901

[Transcriber's note: The second inauguration was a patriotic celebration of the successes of the recently concluded Spanish American War. The new Vice President, Theodore Roosevelt, was a popular figure from the War. President McKinley again had defeated William Jennings Bryan, but the campaign issue was American expansionism overseas. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on a covered platform erected in front of the East Portico of the Capitol. The parade featured soldiers from the campaigns in Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. An inaugural ball was held that evening in the Pension Building.]

[Transcriber's note: The second inauguration was a patriotic celebration of the successes of the recently concluded Spanish-American War. The new Vice President, Theodore Roosevelt, was a well-liked figure from the War. President McKinley defeated William Jennings Bryan once again, with the campaign focusing on American expansion overseas. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on a covered platform set up in front of the East Portico of the Capitol. The parade included soldiers from the campaigns in Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. An inaugural ball took place that evening at the Pension Building.]


My Fellow-Citizens:

Dear Citizens:

When we assembled here on the 4th of March, 1897, there was great anxiety with regard to our currency and credit. None exists now. Then our Treasury receipts were inadequate to meet the current obligations of the Government. Now they are sufficient for all public needs, and we have a surplus instead of a deficit. Then I felt constrained to convene the Congress in extraordinary session to devise revenues to pay the ordinary expenses of the Government. Now I have the satisfaction to announce that the Congress just closed has reduced taxation in the sum of $41,000,000. Then there was deep solicitude because of the long depression in our manufacturing, mining, agricultural, and mercantile industries and the consequent distress of our laboring population. Now every avenue of production is crowded with activity, labor is well employed, and American products find good markets at home and abroad.

When we came together here on March 4, 1897, there was a lot of concern about our currency and credit. That’s not the case anymore. Back then, our Treasury receipts were not enough to cover the Government's current obligations. Now they are more than enough for all public needs, and we have a surplus instead of a deficit. I felt I had to call Congress into an extraordinary session to come up with ways to raise revenue for the Government's regular expenses. Now I’m pleased to announce that the recently ended Congress has reduced taxes by $41 million. At that time, we were very worried due to the long downturn in our manufacturing, mining, agricultural, and commercial sectors, which caused distress among our working population. Today, every area of production is buzzing with activity, there’s plenty of work for laborers, and American products have strong markets both at home and abroad.

Our diversified productions, however, are increasing in such unprecedented volume as to admonish us of the necessity of still further enlarging our foreign markets by broader commercial relations. For this purpose reciprocal trade arrangements with other nations should in liberal spirit be carefully cultivated and promoted.

Our diverse products are growing at such an unprecedented rate that they remind us of the need to further expand our foreign markets through broader commercial relationships. To achieve this, we should carefully develop and promote reciprocal trade agreements with other countries in a generous spirit.

The national verdict of 1896 has for the most part been executed. Whatever remains unfulfilled is a continuing obligation resting with undiminished force upon the Executive and the Congress. But fortunate as our condition is, its permanence can only be assured by sound business methods and strict economy in national administration and legislation. We should not permit our great prosperity to lead us to reckless ventures in business or profligacy in public expenditures. While the Congress determines the objects and the sum of appropriations, the officials of the executive departments are responsible for honest and faithful disbursement, and it should be their constant care to avoid waste and extravagance.

The national decision of 1896 has mostly been carried out. What’s still pending is an ongoing requirement that remains just as important for the Executive and Congress. While we are fortunate in our situation, its stability can only be guaranteed through sound business practices and strict budget management in national governance and legislation. We must not let our significant prosperity drive us to take reckless business risks or wasteful government spending. Although Congress decides on the purpose and amount of appropriations, the officials in the executive departments are accountable for responsible and honest spending, and they should always be focused on avoiding waste and extravagance.

Honesty, capacity, and industry are nowhere more indispensable than in public employment. These should be fundamental requisites to original appointment and the surest guaranties against removal.

Honesty, ability, and hard work are nowhere more essential than in public service. These should be basic requirements for getting hired and the strongest safeguards against being let go.

Four years ago we stood on the brink of war without the people knowing it and without any preparation or effort at preparation for the impending peril. I did all that in honor could be done to avert the war, but without avail. It became inevitable; and the Congress at its first regular session, without party division, provided money in anticipation of the crisis and in preparation to meet it. It came. The result was signally favorable to American arms and in the highest degree honorable to the Government. It imposed upon us obligations from which we cannot escape and from which it would be dishonorable to seek escape. We are now at peace with the world, and it is my fervent prayer that if differences arise between us and other powers they may be settled by peaceful arbitration and that hereafter we may be spared the horrors of war.

Four years ago, we were on the edge of war without the public knowing and without any preparation for the looming danger. I did everything I could to prevent the war, but it was pointless. It became unavoidable; and at its first regular session, Congress, without any party divisions, allocated funds in anticipation of the crisis and to get ready for it. The crisis arrived. The outcome was remarkably favorable for American forces and extremely honorable for the Government. It placed upon us obligations that we cannot ignore and from which it would be shameful to try to escape. We are currently at peace with the world, and it is my heartfelt wish that if conflicts arise between us and other nations, they can be resolved through peaceful arbitration, and that we may be spared from the horrors of war in the future.

Intrusted by the people for a second time with the office of President, I enter upon its administration appreciating the great responsibilities which attach to this renewed honor and commission, promising unreserved devotion on my part to their faithful discharge and reverently invoking for my guidance the direction and favor of Almighty God. I should shrink from the duties this day assumed if I did not feel that in their performance I should have the co-operation of the wise and patriotic men of all parties. It encourages me for the great task which I now undertake to believe that those who voluntarily committed to me the trust imposed upon the Chief Executive of the Republic will give to me generous support in my duties to "preserve, protect, and defend, the Constitution of the United States" and to "care that the laws be faithfully executed." The national purpose is indicated through a national election. It is the constitutional method of ascertaining the public will. When once it is registered it is a law to us all, and faithful observance should follow its decrees.

Entrusted by the people for a second time with the office of President, I begin my administration understanding the significant responsibilities that come with this renewed honor and role. I promise to dedicate myself fully to fulfilling these duties and respectfully seek the guidance and blessing of Almighty God. I would be overwhelmed by the responsibilities I take on today if I didn't believe I would have the support of wise and patriotic individuals from all parties. It gives me confidence for the substantial task ahead to know that those who have entrusted me with the role of Chief Executive will generously support me in my responsibilities to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States" and to "ensure that the laws are faithfully executed." The national purpose is expressed through a national election. This is the constitutional way of determining the public will. Once it is established, it becomes a law for all of us, and we should faithfully adhere to its decisions.

Strong hearts and helpful hands are needed, and, fortunately, we have them in every part of our beloved country. We are reunited. Sectionalism has disappeared. Division on public questions can no longer be traced by the war maps of 1861. These old differences less and less disturb the judgment. Existing problems demand the thought and quicken the conscience of the country, and the responsibility for their presence, as well as for their righteous settlement, rests upon us all—no more upon me than upon you. There are some national questions in the solution of which patriotism should exclude partisanship. Magnifying their difficulties will not take them off our hands nor facilitate their adjustment. Distrust of the capacity, integrity, and high purposes of the American people will not be an inspiring theme for future political contests. Dark pictures and gloomy forebodings are worse than useless. These only becloud, they do not help to point the way of safety and honor. "Hope maketh not ashamed." The prophets of evil were not the builders of the Republic, nor in its crises since have they saved or served it. The faith of the fathers was a mighty force in its creation, and the faith of their descendants has wrought its progress and furnished its defenders. They are obstructionists who despair, and who would destroy confidence in the ability of our people to solve wisely and for civilization the mighty problems resting upon them. The American people, intrenched in freedom at home, take their love for it with them wherever they go, and they reject as mistaken and unworthy the doctrine that we lose our own liberties by securing the enduring foundations of liberty to others. Our institutions will not deteriorate by extension, and our sense of justice will not abate under tropic suns in distant seas. As heretofore, so hereafter will the nation demonstrate its fitness to administer any new estate which events devolve upon it, and in the fear of God will "take occasion by the hand and make the bounds of freedom wider yet." If there are those among us who would make our way more difficult, we must not be disheartened, but the more earnestly dedicate ourselves to the task upon which we have rightly entered. The path of progress is seldom smooth. New things are often found hard to do. Our fathers found them so. We find them so. They are inconvenient. They cost us something. But are we not made better for the effort and sacrifice, and are not those we serve lifted up and blessed?

We need strong hearts and willing hands, and luckily, we have them all over our beloved country. We're united now. Regional divisions have faded away. Disagreements over public issues can't be traced back to the war maps of 1861 anymore. Those old differences bother our judgment less and less. The current challenges need our attention and sharpen our sense of responsibility, which we all share—it's not just up to me or you. Some national issues should bring out our patriotism rather than partisanship. Making these issues seem more difficult won't make them disappear or make them easier to solve. Distrusting the American people's ability, integrity, and intentions won’t inspire future political discussions. Pessimistic views and gloomy predictions don't help; they obscure our path instead of guiding us toward safety and honor. "Hope does not disappoint." The doomsayers were not the ones who built this Republic, and they haven't saved it in its times of crisis. The faith of our forefathers played a crucial role in its creation, and the faith of their descendants has driven its progress and provided its defenders. Those who despair and undermine confidence in our people's ability to wisely tackle significant challenges are the real obstructionists. The American people, rooted in freedom at home, carry that love wherever they go, rejecting the flawed belief that we lose our own freedoms by helping secure lasting liberty for others. Our institutions won’t weaken through expansion, and our sense of justice won't diminish under distant tropical suns. Just as before, the nation will show its ability to take on any new responsibilities that arise, and in the fear of God, will "seize the opportunity and expand the boundaries of freedom even further." If some among us aim to complicate our journey, we must not be discouraged; instead, we should commit ourselves even more earnestly to the important work we've started. The road to progress is rarely smooth. New challenges are often tough to tackle. Our forefathers faced this, and so do we. They are inconvenient and come at a cost. But aren’t we better for the effort and sacrifice, and don’t those we serve benefit and thrive?

We will be consoled, too, with the fact that opposition has confronted every onward movement of the Republic from its opening hour until now, but without success. The Republic has marched on and on, and its step has exalted freedom and humanity. We are undergoing the same ordeal as did our predecessors nearly a century ago. We are following the course they blazed. They triumphed. Will their successors falter and plead organic impotency in the nation? Surely after 125 years of achievement for mankind we will not now surrender our equality with other powers on matters fundamental and essential to nationality. With no such purpose was the nation created. In no such spirit has it developed its full and independent sovereignty. We adhere to the principle of equality among ourselves, and by no act of ours will we assign to ourselves a subordinate rank in the family of nations.

We can also take comfort in the fact that every significant step forward for the Republic has faced opposition from the very beginning, yet it has always prevailed. The Republic keeps moving forward, and its progress champions freedom and humanity. We are experiencing the same challenges that our predecessors faced nearly a century ago. We’re following the path they paved. They succeeded. Will their successors hesitate and claim that the nation is powerless? Surely, after 125 years of progress for humanity, we cannot now give up our equality with other nations on matters that are fundamental and essential to our identity. The nation wasn’t created with that intention. It has not developed its full and independent sovereignty in that spirit. We uphold the principle of equality among ourselves, and by no action of ours will we take a subordinate position in the community of nations.

My fellow-citizens, the public events of the past four years have gone into history. They are too near to justify recital. Some of them were unforeseen; many of them momentous and far-reaching in their consequences to ourselves and our relations with the rest of the world. The part which the United States bore so honorably in the thrilling scenes in China, while new to American life, has been in harmony with its true spirit and best traditions, and in dealing with the results its policy will be that of moderation and fairness.

My fellow citizens, the public events of the past four years are now part of history. They are too recent to recount fully. Some were unexpected; many were significant and had far-reaching effects on us and our relationships with the rest of the world. The honorable role that the United States played in the exciting events in China, while new to American experience, aligns with our true spirit and best traditions. In addressing the outcomes, our policy will be one of moderation and fairness.

We face at this moment a most important question that of the future relations of the United States and Cuba. With our near neighbors we must remain close friends. The declaration of the purposes of this Government in the resolution of April 20, 1898, must be made good. Ever since the evacuation of the island by the army of Spain, the Executive, with all practicable speed, has been assisting its people in the successive steps necessary to the establishment of a free and independent government prepared to assume and perform the obligations of international law which now rest upon the United States under the treaty of Paris. The convention elected by the people to frame a constitution is approaching the completion of its labors. The transfer of American control to the new government is of such great importance, involving an obligation resulting from our intervention and the treaty of peace, that I am glad to be advised by the recent act of Congress of the policy which the legislative branch of the Government deems essential to the best interests of Cuba and the United States. The principles which led to our intervention require that the fundamental law upon which the new government rests should be adapted to secure a government capable of performing the duties and discharging the functions of a separate nation, of observing its international obligations of protecting life and property, insuring order, safety, and liberty, and conforming to the established and historical policy of the United States in its relation to Cuba.

We are currently faced with a crucial question regarding the future relationship between the United States and Cuba. We must remain close friends with our neighbors. The goals stated by this Government in the resolution of April 20, 1898, must be honored. Since Spain's army evacuated the island, the Executive has been diligently supporting its people in the necessary steps to establish a free and independent government that is ready to take on the international responsibilities now imposed on the United States by the Treaty of Paris. The convention elected by the people to draft a constitution is nearing the end of its work. The transition of American control to the new government is extremely important, carrying an obligation stemming from our intervention and the peace treaty. I am pleased to be informed by the recent act of Congress about the policy that the legislative branch believes is vital for the best interests of both Cuba and the United States. The principles that motivated our intervention require that the fundamental law governing the new government should be designed to ensure a government capable of fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of a separate nation, observing its international obligations, protecting lives and property, maintaining order, safety, and liberty, and aligning with the established historical policy of the United States in relation to Cuba.

The peace which we are pledged to leave to the Cuban people must carry with it the guaranties of permanence. We became sponsors for the pacification of the island, and we remain accountable to the Cubans, no less than to our own country and people, for the reconstruction of Cuba as a free commonwealth on abiding foundations of right, justice, liberty, and assured order. Our enfranchisement of the people will not be completed until free Cuba shall "be a reality, not a name; a perfect entity, not a hasty experiment bearing within itself the elements of failure."

The peace we promised to leave for the Cuban people must ensure lasting stability. We took on the responsibility for bringing peace to the island, and we are just as accountable to the Cubans as we are to our own country and its people for rebuilding Cuba as a free commonwealth built on strong foundations of right, justice, liberty, and guaranteed order. Our commitment to empowering the people will not be fulfilled until free Cuba becomes "a reality, not just a name; a complete entity, not a rushed experiment carrying the seeds of failure."

While the treaty of peace with Spain was ratified on the 6th of February, 1899, and ratifications were exchanged nearly two years ago, the Congress has indicated no form of government for the Philippine Islands. It has, however, provided an army to enable the Executive to suppress insurrection, restore peace, give security to the inhabitants, and establish the authority of the United States throughout the archipelago. It has authorized the organization of native troops as auxiliary to the regular force. It has been advised from time to time of the acts of the military and naval officers in the islands, of my action in appointing civil commissions, of the instructions with which they were charged, of their duties and powers, of their recommendations, and of their several acts under executive commission, together with the very complete general information they have submitted. These reports fully set forth the conditions, past and present, in the islands, and the instructions clearly show the principles which will guide the Executive until the Congress shall, as it is required to do by the treaty, determine "the civil rights and political status of the native inhabitants." The Congress having added the sanction of its authority to the powers already possessed and exercised by the Executive under the Constitution, thereby leaving with the Executive the responsibility for the government of the Philippines, I shall continue the efforts already begun until order shall be restored throughout the islands, and as fast as conditions permit will establish local governments, in the formation of which the full co-operation of the people has been already invited, and when established will encourage the people to administer them. The settled purpose, long ago proclaimed, to afford the inhabitants of the islands self-government as fast as they were ready for it will be pursued with earnestness and fidelity. Already something has been accomplished in this direction. The Government's representatives, civil and military, are doing faithful and noble work in their mission of emancipation and merit the approval and support of their countrymen. The most liberal terms of amnesty have already been communicated to the insurgents, and the way is still open for those who have raised their arms against the Government for honorable submission to its authority. Our countrymen should not be deceived. We are not waging war against the inhabitants of the Philippine Islands. A portion of them are making war against the United States. By far the greater part of the inhabitants recognize American sovereignty and welcome it as a guaranty of order and of security for life, property, liberty, freedom of conscience, and the pursuit of happiness. To them full protection will be given. They shall not be abandoned. We will not leave the destiny of the loyal millions the islands to the disloyal thousands who are in rebellion against the United States. Order under civil institutions will come as soon as those who now break the peace shall keep it. Force will not be needed or used when those who make war against us shall make it no more. May it end without further bloodshed, and there be ushered in the reign of peace to be made permanent by a government of liberty under law!

While the peace treaty with Spain was ratified on February 6, 1899, and the ratifications were exchanged nearly two years ago, Congress has not established a form of government for the Philippine Islands. However, it has provided an army to help the Executive deal with insurrections, restore peace, ensure the safety of the residents, and establish U.S. authority throughout the archipelago. It has allowed the formation of native troops to support the regular forces. Congress has been kept informed of the actions taken by military and naval officers in the islands, my decisions in appointing civil commissions, the instructions given to them, their responsibilities and powers, their recommendations, and their activities under executive commissions, along with the thorough general information they have submitted. These reports detail the conditions in the islands, both past and present, and the instructions clearly outline the principles that will guide the Executive until Congress, as required by the treaty, defines "the civil rights and political status of the native inhabitants." By adding its authority to the powers already held and exercised by the Executive under the Constitution, Congress has left the responsibility for governing the Philippines with the Executive. I will continue the efforts already initiated until order is restored throughout the islands and, as conditions allow, I will establish local governments. The people's full cooperation has already been requested in this process, and once these governments are in place, I will encourage the people to manage them. The clear intention to provide the islanders with self-government as soon as they are ready will be pursued sincerely and diligently. Progress has already been made in this area. The Government's representatives, both civil and military, are doing commendable work in their mission of liberation and deserve the approval and support of their fellow citizens. Generous terms of amnesty have already been offered to the insurgents, and the door remains open for those who have taken up arms against the Government to submit honorably. Our fellow citizens shouldn’t be misled. We are not fighting against the people of the Philippine Islands. Some are waging war against the United States. The majority of the inhabitants acknowledge American sovereignty and welcome it as a guarantee of order and security for their lives, property, liberty, freedom of conscience, and the pursuit of happiness. They will be fully protected. We will not abandon them. We will not leave the fate of the loyal millions in the islands to the disloyal thousands who are rebelling against the United States. Order under civil institutions will be achieved as soon as those who disrupt it agree to peace. Force will not be necessary or used when those who are at war with us choose to stop. May this conflict end without further bloodshed, and may we usher in a lasting peace through a government that upholds liberty under the law!






THEODORE ROOSEVELT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1905

[Transcriber's note: The energetic Republican President had taken his first oath of office upon the death of President McKinley, who died of an assassin's gunshot wounds on September 14, 1901. Mr. Roosevelt had been President himself for three years at the election of 1904. The inaugural celebration was the largest and most diverse of any in memory—cowboys, Indians (including the Apache Chief Geronimo), coal miners, soldiers, and students were some of the groups represented. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico of the Capitol by Chief Justice Melville Fuller.]

[Transcriber's note: The dynamic Republican President took his first oath of office after President McKinley was assassinated on September 14, 1901. Mr. Roosevelt had been in office for three years by the time of the 1904 election. The inaugural celebration was the biggest and most diverse ever, featuring cowboys, Native Americans (including Apache Chief Geronimo), coal miners, soldiers, and students among the attendees. Chief Justice Melville Fuller administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol.]


My fellow-citizens, no people on earth have more cause to be thankful than ours, and this is said reverently, in no spirit of boastfulness in our own strength, but with gratitude to the Giver of Good who has blessed us with the conditions which have enabled us to achieve so large a measure of well-being and of happiness. To us as a people it has been granted to lay the foundations of our national life in a new continent. We are the heirs of the ages, and yet we have had to pay few of the penalties which in old countries are exacted by the dead hand of a bygone civilization. We have not been obliged to fight for our existence against any alien race; and yet our life has called for the vigor and effort without which the manlier and hardier virtues wither away. Under such conditions it would be our own fault if we failed; and the success which we have had in the past, the success which we confidently believe the future will bring, should cause in us no feeling of vainglory, but rather a deep and abiding realization of all which life has offered us; a full acknowledgment of the responsibility which is ours; and a fixed determination to show that under a free government a mighty people can thrive best, alike as regards the things of the body and the things of the soul.

My fellow citizens, no people on earth have more reason to be thankful than we do, and I say this with respect, not out of pride in our own strength, but with gratitude to the Giver of Good who has blessed us with the conditions that have allowed us to achieve so much well-being and happiness. We, as a people, have been given the chance to build our national life on a new continent. We are the heirs of the ages, yet we have faced few of the burdens that old countries bear from past civilizations. We haven't had to fight for our survival against any foreign race; still, our lives have called for the energy and effort without which our stronger virtues would diminish. Under these circumstances, it would be our own fault if we failed. The success we’ve experienced in the past, and the success we believe the future will bring, should not lead us to pride, but rather to a deep appreciation of all that life has given us; a full acknowledgment of our responsibilities; and a firm commitment to demonstrate that under a free government, a great people can flourish in both physical and spiritual ways.

Much has been given us, and much will rightfully be expected from us. We have duties to others and duties to ourselves; and we can shirk neither. We have become a great nation, forced by the fact of its greatness into relations with the other nations of the earth, and we must behave as beseems a people with such responsibilities. Toward all other nations, large and small, our attitude must be one of cordial and sincere friendship. We must show not only in our words, but in our deeds, that we are earnestly desirous of securing their good will by acting toward them in a spirit of just and generous recognition of all their rights. But justice and generosity in a nation, as in an individual, count most when shown not by the weak but by the strong. While ever careful to refrain from wrongdoing others, we must be no less insistent that we are not wronged ourselves. We wish peace, but we wish the peace of justice, the peace of righteousness. We wish it because we think it is right and not because we are afraid. No weak nation that acts manfully and justly should ever have cause to fear us, and no strong power should ever be able to single us out as a subject for insolent aggression.

We've been given a lot, and people will justifiably expect a lot from us. We have responsibilities to others and to ourselves, and we can’t ignore either. We’ve become a great nation, and that greatness puts us in a position where we interact with other nations around the world, so we need to act in a way that reflects those responsibilities. Our attitude towards all other nations, big or small, should be one of genuine and friendly goodwill. We need to demonstrate, not just through our words but also through our actions, that we sincerely want to earn their goodwill by recognizing all their rights fairly and generously. However, the principles of justice and generosity in a nation, as in a person, matter most when displayed by the strong rather than the weak. While we should always be cautious not to wrong others, we must also insist on not being wronged ourselves. We desire peace, but we want a peace rooted in justice and righteousness. We desire it because we believe it's right, not out of fear. No weak nation that acts bravely and fairly should ever have reason to fear us, and no powerful nation should ever be able to target us for disrespectful aggression.

Our relations with the other powers of the world are important; but still more important are our relations among ourselves. Such growth in wealth, in population, and in power as this nation has seen during the century and a quarter of its national life is inevitably accompanied by a like growth in the problems which are ever before every nation that rises to greatness. Power invariably means both responsibility and danger. Our forefathers faced certain perils which we have outgrown. We now face other perils, the very existence of which it was impossible that they should foresee. Modern life is both complex and intense, and the tremendous changes wrought by the extraordinary industrial development of the last half century are felt in every fiber of our social and political being. Never before have men tried so vast and formidable an experiment as that of administering the affairs of a continent under the forms of a Democratic republic. The conditions which have told for our marvelous material well-being, which have developed to a very high degree our energy, self-reliance, and individual initiative, have also brought the care and anxiety inseparable from the accumulation of great wealth in industrial centers. Upon the success of our experiment much depends, not only as regards our own welfare, but as regards the welfare of mankind. If we fail, the cause of free self-government throughout the world will rock to its foundations, and therefore our responsibility is heavy, to ourselves, to the world as it is to-day, and to the generations yet unborn. There is no good reason why we should fear the future, but there is every reason why we should face it seriously, neither hiding from ourselves the gravity of the problems before us nor fearing to approach these problems with the unbending, unflinching purpose to solve them aright.

Our relationships with other countries are important, but our relationships with each other are even more crucial. The growth in wealth, population, and power that our nation has experienced over the past one hundred and twenty-five years naturally brings about an increase in the issues that every rising nation faces. Power always comes with both responsibility and risk. Our ancestors dealt with certain challenges that we have since outgrown. Today, we face different dangers, ones that they couldn’t possibly have predicted. Modern life is complex and intense, and the significant changes brought by extraordinary industrial progress in the last fifty years affect every part of our social and political life. Never before have people attempted such a vast and challenging experiment as managing the affairs of a continent through a democratic republic. The conditions that have contributed to our amazing material prosperity—enhancing our energy, self-reliance, and individual initiative—have also introduced the care and anxiety that come with accumulating great wealth in industrial hubs. The success of our experiment is crucial, not just for our own well-being, but for the well-being of humanity. If we fail, the principle of free self-government worldwide will be seriously undermined, and that loads us with a heavy responsibility—to ourselves, to the world as it is today, and to future generations. There’s no good reason to fear what lies ahead, but there are many reasons to confront it earnestly, fully recognizing the seriousness of the challenges we face and approaching those challenges with unwavering determination to solve them correctly.

Yet, after all, though the problems are new, though the tasks set before us differ from the tasks set before our fathers who founded and preserved this Republic, the spirit in which these tasks must be undertaken and these problems faced, if our duty is to be well done, remains essentially unchanged. We know that self-government is difficult. We know that no people needs such high traits of character as that people which seeks to govern its affairs aright through the freely expressed will of the freemen who compose it. But we have faith that we shall not prove false to the memories of the men of the mighty past. They did their work, they left us the splendid heritage we now enjoy. We in our turn have an assured confidence that we shall be able to leave this heritage unwasted and enlarged to our children and our children's children. To do so we must show, not merely in great crises, but in the everyday affairs of life, the qualities of practical intelligence, of courage, of hardihood, and endurance, and above all the power of devotion to a lofty ideal, which made great the men who founded this Republic in the days of Washington, which made great the men who preserved this Republic in the days of Abraham Lincoln.

Yet, after all, even though the challenges are new and the tasks we face are different from those our ancestors encountered when they founded and preserved this Republic, the spirit in which we must approach these tasks and confront these challenges, if we are to fulfill our duty well, remains essentially the same. We understand that self-government is tough. We recognize that no people require such high moral qualities as those who aim to manage their affairs correctly through the freely expressed will of its free citizens. But we believe that we will honor the memories of the great men of the past. They did their part, and they left us the incredible legacy we enjoy today. We, in our time, are confident that we will be able to pass this legacy on to our children and grandchildren without letting it go to waste. To achieve this, we must demonstrate, not just in times of crisis, but in our daily lives, the qualities of practical intelligence, courage, resilience, and endurance, and above all, the commitment to a noble ideal that made the founders of this Republic great in the days of Washington and that made those who preserved it great in the days of Abraham Lincoln.






WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 1909

[Transcriber's note: A blizzard the night before caused the ceremonies to be moved into the Senate Chamber in the Capitol. The oath of office was administered for the sixth time by Chief Justice Melville Fuller. The new President took his oath on the Supreme Court Bible, which he used again in 1921 to take his oaths as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. An inaugural ball that evening was held at the Pension Building.]

[Transcriber's note: A blizzard the night before caused the ceremonies to be moved into the Senate Chamber in the Capitol. The oath of office was administered for the sixth time by Chief Justice Melville Fuller. The new President took his oath on the Supreme Court Bible, which he used again in 1921 to take his oaths as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. An inaugural ball that evening was held at the Pension Building.]


My Fellow-Citizens:

My Fellow Citizens:

Anyone who has taken the oath I have just taken must feel a heavy weight of responsibility. If not, he has no conception of the powers and duties of the office upon which he is about to enter, or he is lacking in a proper sense of the obligation which the oath imposes.

Anyone who has taken the oath I just took must feel a heavy weight of responsibility. If not, they have no understanding of the powers and duties of the office they are about to enter, or they lack a proper sense of the obligation that the oath imposes.

The office of an inaugural address is to give a summary outline of the main policies of the new administration, so far as they can be anticipated. I have had the honor to be one of the advisers of my distinguished predecessor, and, as such, to hold up his hands in the reforms he has initiated. I should be untrue to myself, to my promises, and to the declarations of the party platform upon which I was elected to office, if I did not make the maintenance and enforcement of those reforms a most important feature of my administration. They were directed to the suppression of the lawlessness and abuses of power of the great combinations of capital invested in railroads and in industrial enterprises carrying on interstate commerce. The steps which my predecessor took and the legislation passed on his recommendation have accomplished much, have caused a general halt in the vicious policies which created popular alarm, and have brought about in the business affected a much higher regard for existing law.

The purpose of an inaugural address is to outline the main policies of the new administration, as much as we can predict them. I've had the privilege of being one of the advisers to my distinguished predecessor, supporting the reforms he started. I would be dishonest to myself, to my commitments, and to the principles of the party platform that got me elected if I didn't make the preservation and enforcement of those reforms a key focus of my administration. They were aimed at curbing the lawlessness and abuses of power from the large capital combinations involved in railroads and industrial businesses engaged in interstate commerce. The actions my predecessor took and the laws passed on his advice have achieved a lot, have halted the harmful policies that caused widespread concern, and have led to a much greater respect for existing laws within the affected businesses.

To render the reforms lasting, however, and to secure at the same time freedom from alarm on the part of those pursuing proper and progressive business methods, further legislative and executive action are needed. Relief of the railroads from certain restrictions of the antitrust law have been urged by my predecessor and will be urged by me. On the other hand, the administration is pledged to legislation looking to a proper federal supervision and restriction to prevent excessive issues of bonds and stock by companies owning and operating interstate commerce railroads.

To make the reforms permanent and ensure that those using proper and progressive business practices feel secure, more legislative and executive action is necessary. My predecessor has advocated for relieving railroads from certain antitrust law restrictions, and I will do the same. At the same time, the administration is committed to legislation that establishes appropriate federal oversight and limits to prevent excessive stock and bond issuance by companies that own and operate interstate commerce railroads.

Then, too, a reorganization of the Department of Justice, of the Bureau of Corporations in the Department of Commerce and Labor, and of the Interstate Commerce Commission, looking to effective cooperation of these agencies, is needed to secure a more rapid and certain enforcement of the laws affecting interstate railroads and industrial combinations.

Then, a reorganization of the Department of Justice, the Bureau of Corporations in the Department of Commerce and Labor, and the Interstate Commerce Commission is necessary to ensure these agencies work together effectively for quicker and more reliable enforcement of the laws regarding interstate railroads and industrial combinations.

I hope to be able to submit at the first regular session of the incoming Congress, in December next, definite suggestions in respect to the needed amendments to the antitrust and the interstate commerce law and the changes required in the executive departments concerned in their enforcement.

I hope to submit specific suggestions regarding the necessary amendments to antitrust and interstate commerce laws, along with the changes needed in the relevant executive departments for enforcement, at the first regular session of the upcoming Congress in December.

It is believed that with the changes to be recommended American business can be assured of that measure of stability and certainty in respect to those things that may be done and those that are prohibited which is essential to the life and growth of all business. Such a plan must include the right of the people to avail themselves of those methods of combining capital and effort deemed necessary to reach the highest degree of economic efficiency, at the same time differentiating between combinations based upon legitimate economic reasons and those formed with the intent of creating monopolies and artificially controlling prices.

It is believed that the recommended changes will ensure American businesses have the stability and clarity they need regarding what actions are allowed and what actions are not. This stability is crucial for the survival and growth of all businesses. Such a plan must guarantee people's right to use the methods of pooling capital and effort considered necessary for achieving maximum economic efficiency, while also distinguishing between combinations based on legitimate economic reasons and those formed with the intent to create monopolies and manipulate prices.

The work of formulating into practical shape such changes is creative word of the highest order, and requires all the deliberation possible in the interval. I believe that the amendments to be proposed are just as necessary in the protection of legitimate business as in the clinching of the reforms which properly bear the name of my predecessor.

The task of putting these changes into a practical form is a creative endeavor of the highest level and requires careful thought in the meantime. I believe the proposed amendments are just as essential for protecting legitimate business as they are for solidifying the reforms that rightly carry the name of my predecessor.

A matter of most pressing importance is the revision of the tariff. In accordance with the promises of the platform upon which I was elected, I shall call Congress into extra session to meet on the 15th day of March, in order that consideration may be at once given to a bill revising the Dingley Act. This should secure an adequate revenue and adjust the duties in such a manner as to afford to labor and to all industries in this country, whether of the farm, mine or factory, protection by tariff equal to the difference between the cost of production abroad and the cost of production here, and have a provision which shall put into force, upon executive determination of certain facts, a higher or maximum tariff against those countries whose trade policy toward us equitably requires such discrimination. It is thought that there has been such a change in conditions since the enactment of the Dingley Act, drafted on a similarly protective principle, that the measure of the tariff above stated will permit the reduction of rates in certain schedules and will require the advancement of few, if any.

A very important issue is the revision of the tariff. Following the promises made during my campaign, I will call Congress into a special session on March 15th to immediately consider a bill that revises the Dingley Act. This should ensure enough revenue and adjust duties to provide labor and all industries in this country—whether from farms, mines, or factories—with tariff protection equal to the difference between production costs abroad and domestically. Additionally, it will include a provision that allows for a higher or maximum tariff against countries whose trade policies require such action, based on certain facts determined by the executive. It is believed that there has been enough change in conditions since the Dingley Act was enacted, which was also based on protective principles, that the proposed tariff adjustments will allow for reductions in some areas and require minimal increases, if any.

The proposal to revise the tariff made in such an authoritative way as to lead the business community to count upon it necessarily halts all those branches of business directly affected; and as these are most important, it disturbs the whole business of the country. It is imperatively necessary, therefore, that a tariff bill be drawn in good faith in accordance with promises made before the election by the party in power, and as promptly passed as due consideration will permit. It is not that the tariff is more important in the long run than the perfecting of the reforms in respect to antitrust legislation and interstate commerce regulation, but the need for action when the revision of the tariff has been determined upon is more immediate to avoid embarrassment of business. To secure the needed speed in the passage of the tariff bill, it would seem wise to attempt no other legislation at the extra session. I venture this as a suggestion only, for the course to be taken by Congress, upon the call of the Executive, is wholly within its discretion.

The proposal to change the tariff is presented in such a way that leads the business community to rely on it, which inevitably stops all the branches of business directly affected. Since these branches are crucial, it disrupts the entire business landscape of the country. Therefore, it is essential that a tariff bill is created honestly, in line with the promises made before the election by the ruling party, and passed as quickly as careful consideration allows. While the tariff isn't necessarily more important in the long run than refining reforms regarding antitrust laws and interstate commerce, the urgency for action once the need to revise the tariff has been recognized is more immediate to prevent business disruptions. To ensure the tariff bill is passed swiftly, it might be wise to avoid introducing any other legislation during the extra session. I'm just suggesting this, as the decision on how Congress will proceed during the Executive's call is entirely up to them.

In the mailing of a tariff bill the prime motive is taxation and the securing thereby of a revenue. Due largely to the business depression which followed the financial panic of 1907, the revenue from customs and other sources has decreased to such an extent that the expenditures for the current fiscal year will exceed the receipts by $100,000,000. It is imperative that such a deficit shall not continue, and the framers of the tariff bill must, of course, have in mind the total revenues likely to be produced by it and so arrange the duties as to secure an adequate income. Should it be impossible to do so by import duties, new kinds of taxation must be adopted, and among these I recommend a graduated inheritance tax as correct in principle and as certain and easy of collection.

In sending out a tariff bill, the main goal is taxation and generating revenue. Due largely to the economic downturn that followed the financial panic of 1907, the revenue from customs and other sources has dropped to the point where expenditures for the current fiscal year will exceed receipts by $100 million. It's crucial that this deficit does not continue, and the creators of the tariff bill must definitely consider the total revenue it is likely to generate and organize the duties to ensure enough income. If it's not possible to achieve this through import duties, new forms of taxation will need to be implemented, and I suggest a graduated inheritance tax as it is fair in principle and straightforward to collect.

The obligation on the part of those responsible for the expenditures made to carry on the Government, to be as economical as possible, and to make the burden of taxation as light as possible, is plain, and should be affirmed in every declaration of government policy. This is especially true when we are face to face with a heavy deficit. But when the desire to win the popular approval leads to the cutting off of expenditures really needed to make the Government effective and to enable it to accomplish its proper objects, the result is as much to be condemned as the waste of government funds in unnecessary expenditure. The scope of a modern government in what it can and ought to accomplish for its people has been widened far beyond the principles laid down by the old "laissez faire" school of political writers, and this widening has met popular approval.

The responsibility of those in charge of government spending to be as cost-effective as possible and to minimize the tax burden is clear and should be stated in every government policy declaration. This is especially important when facing a significant deficit. However, when the quest for public approval leads to cutting necessary spending that enables the government to function effectively and achieve its rightful goals, the result is just as wrong as wasting government money on unnecessary expenses. The role of a modern government in what it can and should achieve for its citizens has expanded well beyond the ideas proposed by the old "laissez faire" political writers, and this expansion has been met with public support.

In the Department of Agriculture the use of scientific experiments on a large scale and the spread of information derived from them for the improvement of general agriculture must go on.

In the Department of Agriculture, the use of large-scale scientific experiments and the sharing of information gained from them to improve overall agriculture must continue.

The importance of supervising business of great railways and industrial combinations and the necessary investigation and prosecution of unlawful business methods are another necessary tax upon Government which did not exist half a century ago.

The importance of overseeing major railways and industrial companies, along with the need to investigate and prosecute illegal business practices, is another essential responsibility for the government that didn't exist fifty years ago.

The putting into force of laws which shall secure the conservation of our resources, so far as they may be within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, including the most important work of saving and restoring our forests and the great improvement of waterways, are all proper government functions which must involve large expenditure if properly performed. While some of them, like the reclamation of arid lands, are made to pay for themselves, others are of such an indirect benefit that this cannot be expected of them. A permanent improvement, like the Panama Canal, should be treated as a distinct enterprise, and should be paid for by the proceeds of bonds, the issue of which will distribute its cost between the present and future generations in accordance with the benefits derived. It may well be submitted to the serious consideration of Congress whether the deepening and control of the channel of a great river system, like that of the Ohio or of the Mississippi, when definite and practical plans for the enterprise have been approved and determined upon, should not be provided for in the same way.

The implementation of laws to protect our resources, as far as they fall under the Federal Government's authority, including the crucial tasks of saving and restoring our forests and greatly improving our waterways, are all essential government functions that will require significant investment to do properly. While some projects, such as reclaiming dry lands, can pay for themselves, others provide such indirect benefits that self-funding isn't realistic. Major improvements, like the Panama Canal, should be considered separate projects and funded through bonds, allowing their costs to be shared between current and future generations based on the benefits received. Congress should seriously consider whether the deepening and management of the channels of major river systems, like the Ohio or Mississippi, should also be funded in a similar manner once clear and practical plans for the project have been approved.

Then, too, there are expenditures of Government absolutely necessary if our country is to maintain its proper place among the nations of the world, and is to exercise its proper influence in defense of its own trade interests in the maintenance of traditional American policy against the colonization of European monarchies in this hemisphere, and in the promotion of peace and international morality. I refer to the cost of maintaining a proper army, a proper navy, and suitable fortifications upon the mainland of the United States and in its dependencies.

Then, there are government expenses that are absolutely necessary if our country is to keep its rightful position among the nations of the world and to effectively advocate for its trade interests. This is crucial in order to uphold traditional American policies against European monarchies colonizing this hemisphere and to promote peace and international ethics. I'm talking about the costs of maintaining a capable army, a strong navy, and appropriate fortifications on the mainland of the United States and in its territories.

We should have an army so organized and so officered as to be capable in time of emergency, in cooperation with the national militia and under the provisions of a proper national volunteer law, rapidly to expand into a force sufficient to resist all probable invasion from abroad and to furnish a respectable expeditionary force if necessary in the maintenance of our traditional American policy which bears the name of President Monroe.

We need to have an army that's well-organized and led by capable officers so that in times of emergency, it can quickly team up with the national militia and, under a suitable national volunteer law, expand rapidly into a force strong enough to fend off any likely foreign invasion and provide a respectable expeditionary force if needed to uphold our traditional American policy known as the Monroe Doctrine.

Our fortifications are yet in a state of only partial completeness, and the number of men to man them is insufficient. In a few years however, the usual annual appropriations for our coast defenses, both on the mainland and in the dependencies, will make them sufficient to resist all direct attack, and by that time we may hope that the men to man them will be provided as a necessary adjunct. The distance of our shores from Europe and Asia of course reduces the necessity for maintaining under arms a great army, but it does not take away the requirement of mere prudence—that we should have an army sufficiently large and so constituted as to form a nucleus out of which a suitable force can quickly grow.

Our fortifications are still only partially complete, and we don't have enough people to staff them. However, in a few years, the usual annual funding for our coastal defenses, both on the mainland and in the territories, will be enough to withstand any direct attacks. By then, we can also hope to have enough personnel as needed support. The distance of our shores from Europe and Asia reduces the need to keep a large standing army, but it doesn't eliminate the need for prudence—meaning we should have an army that is large enough and structured in a way to quickly form a suitable force when necessary.

What has been said of the army may be affirmed in even a more emphatic way of the navy. A modern navy can not be improvised. It must be built and in existence when the emergency arises which calls for its use and operation. My distinguished predecessor has in many speeches and messages set out with great force and striking language the necessity for maintaining a strong navy commensurate with the coast line, the governmental resources, and the foreign trade of our Nation; and I wish to reiterate all the reasons which he has presented in favor of the policy of maintaining a strong navy as the best conservator of our peace with other nations, and the best means of securing respect for the assertion of our rights, the defense of our interests, and the exercise of our influence in international matters.

What has been said about the army can be stated even more strongly about the navy. A modern navy can't be thrown together at the last minute. It needs to be built and ready to go when the situation arises that requires its use. My respected predecessor has, in many speeches and messages, forcefully highlighted the importance of having a strong navy that matches our coastline, government resources, and foreign trade. I want to reiterate all the reasons he has provided for the policy of maintaining a strong navy as the best way to preserve our peace with other nations and to ensure respect for our rights, defend our interests, and exert our influence in international affairs.

Our international policy is always to promote peace. We shall enter into any war with a full consciousness of the awful consequences that it always entails, whether successful or not, and we, of course, shall make every effort consistent with national honor and the highest national interest to avoid a resort to arms. We favor every instrumentality, like that of the Hague Tribunal and arbitration treaties made with a view to its use in all international controversies, in order to maintain peace and to avoid war. But we should be blind to existing conditions and should allow ourselves to become foolish idealists if we did not realize that, with all the nations of the world armed and prepared for war, we must be ourselves in a similar condition, in order to prevent other nations from taking advantage of us and of our inability to defend our interests and assert our rights with a strong hand.

Our foreign policy is always about promoting peace. We'll enter any war fully aware of the terrible consequences it brings, regardless of whether it's successful or not, and we will definitely make every effort that aligns with our national honor and best interests to avoid fighting. We support all methods, like the Hague Tribunal and arbitration agreements made to use in all international disputes, to maintain peace and prevent war. But we would be naive and unrealistic if we ignored the current situation and didn’t recognize that, with all nations ready for war, we also need to be prepared to protect ourselves from others taking advantage of us or our ability to defend our interests and assert our rights effectively.

In the international controversies that are likely to arise in the Orient growing out of the question of the open door and other issues the United States can maintain her interests intact and can secure respect for her just demands. She will not be able to do so, however, if it is understood that she never intends to back up her assertion of right and her defense of her interest by anything but mere verbal protest and diplomatic note. For these reasons the expenses of the army and navy and of coast defenses should always be considered as something which the Government must pay for, and they should not be cut off through mere consideration of economy. Our Government is able to afford a suitable army and a suitable navy. It may maintain them without the slightest danger to the Republic or the cause of free institutions, and fear of additional taxation ought not to change a proper policy in this regard.

In the international disputes that are likely to come up in the East regarding the open door policy and other issues, the United States can keep its interests secure and gain respect for its rightful demands. However, this won’t happen if it’s clear that the U.S. plans to back its claims and protect its interests only with talk and diplomatic notes. Because of this, the costs of the army, navy, and coastal defenses should always be seen as necessary expenses for the Government, and they shouldn’t be cut just for budgetary reasons. Our Government can afford a capable army and navy. It can maintain them without putting the Republic or the values of democracy at risk, and concerns about extra taxes shouldn’t alter a sensible policy in this area.

The policy of the United States in the Spanish war and since has given it a position of influence among the nations that it never had before, and should be constantly exerted to securing to its bona fide citizens, whether native or naturalized, respect for them as such in foreign countries. We should make every effort to prevent humiliating and degrading prohibition against any of our citizens wishing temporarily to sojourn in foreign countries because of race or religion.

The United States' approach during the Spanish war and afterward has granted it a level of influence among nations that it never had before, and this influence should be consistently used to ensure that its legitimate citizens, whether native-born or naturalized, are respected as such in foreign countries. We must do everything possible to prevent any humiliating or degrading restrictions against any of our citizens who wish to temporarily visit foreign countries because of their race or religion.

The admission of Asiatic immigrants who cannot be amalgamated with our population has been made the subject either of prohibitory clauses in our treaties and statutes or of strict administrative regulation secured by diplomatic negotiation. I sincerely hope that we may continue to minimize the evils likely to arise from such immigration without unnecessary friction and by mutual concessions between self-respecting governments. Meantime we must take every precaution to prevent, or failing that, to punish outbursts of race feeling among our people against foreigners of whatever nationality who have by our grant a treaty right to pursue lawful business here and to be protected against lawless assault or injury.

The entry of Asian immigrants who can’t integrate with our population has either been restricted through prohibitive clauses in our treaties and laws or tightly regulated through diplomatic negotiations. I truly hope we can keep reducing the issues that may come from this immigration without causing unnecessary conflict, and through mutual concessions between respectful governments. In the meantime, we must take every step to prevent, or if that fails, to address any racial tensions among our people against foreigners of any nationality who, by our treaty, have the right to conduct legitimate business here and to be safeguarded against unlawful attacks or harm.

This leads me to point out a serious defect in the present federal jurisdiction, which ought to be remedied at once. Having assured to other countries by treaty the protection of our laws for such of their subjects or citizens as we permit to come within our jurisdiction, we now leave to a state or a city, not under the control of the Federal Government, the duty of performing our international obligations in this respect. By proper legislation we may, and ought to, place in the hands of the Federal Executive the means of enforcing the treaty rights of such aliens in the courts of the Federal Government. It puts our Government in a pusillanimous position to make definite engagements to protect aliens and then to excuse the failure to perform those engagements by an explanation that the duty to keep them is in States or cities, not within our control. If we would promise we must put ourselves in a position to perform our promise. We cannot permit the possible failure of justice, due to local prejudice in any State or municipal government, to expose us to the risk of a war which might be avoided if federal jurisdiction was asserted by suitable legislation by Congress and carried out by proper proceedings instituted by the Executive in the courts of the National Government.

This brings me to a significant flaw in the current federal jurisdiction that needs to be fixed immediately. We’ve assured other countries through treaties that we will protect their citizens who come under our jurisdiction, yet we leave the job of upholding our international obligations to a state or city that isn’t under the Federal Government’s control. Through proper legislation, we should empower the Federal Executive to enforce the treaty rights of these aliens in federal courts. It undermines our Government to make solid commitments to protect foreigners, only to justify our failure to uphold those commitments by stating that the responsibility lies with states or cities, which are beyond our control. If we’re making promises, we must ensure we can keep them. We can’t allow potential failures of justice, arising from local bias in any state or city government, to put us at risk of conflicts that could be avoided if Congress asserted federal jurisdiction with appropriate legislation and the Executive took action in the National Government’s courts.

One of the reforms to be carried out during the incoming administration is a change of our monetary and banking laws, so as to secure greater elasticity in the forms of currency available for trade and to prevent the limitations of law from operating to increase the embarrassment of a financial panic. The monetary commission, lately appointed, is giving full consideration to existing conditions and to all proposed remedies, and will doubtless suggest one that will meet the requirements of business and of public interest.

One of the reforms that the next administration will implement is to change our monetary and banking laws to allow for more flexibility in the types of currency available for trade and to stop legal limitations from making a financial panic worse. The recently appointed monetary commission is carefully examining current conditions and all suggested solutions, and they will likely propose one that addresses the needs of businesses and the public.

We may hope that the report will embody neither the narrow dew of those who believe that the sole purpose of the new system should be to secure a large return on banking capital or of those who would have greater expansion of currency with little regard to provisions for its immediate redemption or ultimate security. There is no subject of economic discussion so intricate and so likely to evoke differing views and dogmatic statements as this one. The commission, in studying the general influence of currency on business and of business on currency, have wisely extended their investigations in European banking and monetary methods. The information that they have derived from such experts as they have found abroad will undoubtedly be found helpful in the solution of the difficult problem they have in hand.

We hope that the report won't reflect the narrow views of those who think the new system should only focus on maximizing profits for banks or those who want to increase the currency supply without considering how it can be redeemed or secured in the long run. No topic in economics is as complex and likely to spark differing opinions and rigid statements as this one. The commission, while examining how currency affects business and vice versa, has wisely expanded their research to include European banking and monetary practices. The insights they've gained from experts abroad will surely be valuable in tackling the challenging problem they face.

The incoming Congress should promptly fulfill the promise of the Republican platform and pass a proper postal savings bank bill. It will not be unwise or excessive paternalism. The promise to repay by the Government will furnish an inducement to savings deposits which private enterprise can not supply and at such a low rate of interest as not to withdraw custom from existing banks. It will substantially increase the funds available for investment as capital in useful enterprises. It will furnish absolute security which makes the proposed scheme of government guaranty of deposits so alluring, without its pernicious results.

The incoming Congress should quickly deliver on the promise of the Republican platform by passing a proper postal savings bank bill. This action won’t be seen as unwise or overly protective. The government’s promise to repay will encourage savings deposits in a way that private enterprises cannot match, and at such a low interest rate that it won’t take customers away from existing banks. This will greatly increase the funds available for investment in useful ventures. It will provide complete security, making the proposed government guarantee of deposits attractive, without the negative consequences.

I sincerely hope that the incoming Congress will be alive, as it should be, to the importance of our foreign trade and of encouraging it in every way feasible. The possibility of increasing this trade in the Orient, in the Philippines, and in South America are known to everyone who has given the matter attention. The direct effect of free trade between this country and the Philippines will be marked upon our sales of cottons, agricultural machinery, and other manufactures. The necessity of the establishment of direct lines of steamers between North and South America has been brought to the attention of Congress by my predecessor and by Mr. Root before and after his noteworthy visit to that continent, and I sincerely hope that Congress may be induced to see the wisdom of a tentative effort to establish such lines by the use of mail subsidies.

I genuinely hope that the new Congress will recognize the importance of our foreign trade and find ways to encourage it as much as possible. Everyone who's looked into it knows that there are great opportunities to increase trade in the Orient, the Philippines, and South America. The direct impact of free trade between our country and the Philippines will significantly boost our sales of cotton, agricultural machinery, and other products. The need for direct shipping routes between North and South America has already been highlighted to Congress by my predecessor and by Mr. Root, both before and after his significant trip to that continent, and I truly hope Congress will consider the idea of starting these routes with the help of mail subsidies.

The importance of the part which the Departments of Agriculture and of Commerce and Labor may play in ridding the markets of Europe of prohibitions and discriminations against the importation of our products is fully understood, and it is hoped that the use of the maximum and minimum feature of our tariff law to be soon passed will be effective to remove many of those restrictions.

The roles of the Departments of Agriculture and Commerce and Labor in eliminating the bans and biases against the import of our products in European markets are well recognized. It is hoped that the soon-to-be-passed maximum and minimum provisions of our tariff law will effectively lift many of those restrictions.

The Panama Canal will have a most important bearing upon the trade between the eastern and far western sections of our country, and will greatly increase the facilities for transportation between the eastern and the western seaboard, and may possibly revolutionize the transcontinental rates with respect to bulky merchandise. It will also have a most beneficial effect to increase the trade between the eastern seaboard of the United States and the western coast of South America, and, indeed, with some of the important ports on the east coast of South America reached by rail from the west coast.

The Panama Canal will have a significant impact on trade between the eastern and far western parts of our country, greatly enhancing transportation options between the eastern and western coasts, and could possibly transform transcontinental shipping rates for large goods. It will also positively affect trade between the eastern coast of the United States and the western coast of South America, as well as with some key ports on the east coast of South America that can be accessed by rail from the west coast.

The work on the canal is making most satisfactory progress. The type of the canal as a lock canal was fixed by Congress after a full consideration of the conflicting reports of the majority and minority of the consulting board, and after the recommendation of the War Department and the Executive upon those reports. Recent suggestion that something had occurred on the Isthmus to make the lock type of the canal less feasible than it was supposed to be when the reports were made and the policy determined on led to a visit to the Isthmus of a board of competent engineers to examine the Gatun dam and locks, which are the key of the lock type. The report of that board shows nothing has occurred in the nature of newly revealed evidence which should change the views once formed in the original discussion. The construction will go on under a most effective organization controlled by Colonel Goethals and his fellow army engineers associated with him, and will certainly be completed early in the next administration, if not before.

The work on the canal is progressing very well. Congress decided to go with a lock canal after carefully considering the differing reports from both the majority and minority of the consulting board, along with recommendations from the War Department and the Executive based on those reports. A recent suggestion that something happened on the Isthmus, making the lock type of canal less feasible than previously thought, prompted a visit by a board of skilled engineers to examine the Gatun dam and locks, which are crucial to the lock design. Their report indicates that no new evidence has emerged that would change the conclusions reached during the initial discussions. Construction will continue under a highly effective organization led by Colonel Goethals and his fellow army engineers, and it will definitely be completed early in the next administration, if not sooner.

Some type of canal must be constructed. The lock type has been selected. We are all in favor of having it built as promptly as possible. We must not now, therefore, keep up a fire in the rear of the agents whom we have authorized to do our work on the Isthmus. We must hold up their hands, and speaking for the incoming administration I wish to say that I propose to devote all the energy possible and under my control to pushing of this work on the plans which have been adopted, and to stand behind the men who are doing faithful, hard work to bring about the early completion of this, the greatest constructive enterprise of modern times.

We need to build a type of canal. The lock design has been chosen. We're all in favor of getting it done as quickly as possible. We shouldn't undermine the agents we've authorized to carry out our work on the Isthmus. We need to support them, and speaking for the incoming administration, I want to say that I plan to dedicate all the energy I can to advancing this project based on the adopted plans, and to back the people who are working diligently to complete this, the most significant construction project of our time.

The governments of our dependencies in Porto Rico and the Philippines are progressing as favorably as could be desired. The prosperity of Porto Rico continues unabated. The business conditions in the Philippines are not all that we could wish them to be, but with the passage of the new tariff bill permitting free trade between the United States and the archipelago, with such limitations on sugar and tobacco as shall prevent injury to domestic interests in those products, we can count on an improvement in business conditions in the Philippines and the development of a mutually profitable trade between this country and the islands. Meantime our Government in each dependency is upholding the traditions of civil liberty and increasing popular control which might be expected under American auspices. The work which we are doing there redounds to our credit as a nation.

The governments of our territories in Puerto Rico and the Philippines are making progress as positively as we could hope for. Puerto Rico's prosperity continues without interruption. While business conditions in the Philippines aren't ideal, the recent tariff bill allowing free trade between the United States and the islands—while placing some limits on sugar and tobacco to protect domestic interests—should lead to improved business conditions in the Philippines and create a mutually beneficial trade relationship between our country and the islands. In the meantime, our government in each territory is upholding the values of civil liberty and increasing popular control that we would expect under American guidance. The efforts we are making there reflect positively on us as a nation.

I look forward with hope to increasing the already good feeling between the South and the other sections of the country. My chief purpose is not to effect a change in the electoral vote of the Southern States. That is a secondary consideration. What I look forward to is an increase in the tolerance of political views of all kinds and their advocacy throughout the South, and the existence of a respectable political opposition in every State; even more than this, to an increased feeling on the part of all the people in the South that this Government is their Government, and that its officers in their states are their officers.

I’m hopeful about strengthening the already positive relationship between the South and the rest of the country. My main goal isn’t to change how the Southern States vote. That’s just a secondary issue. What I really want is to see more acceptance of different political views and their discussion across the South, along with a respectable political opposition in every state. Even more importantly, I want everyone in the South to feel that this government is theirs and that its officials in their states are their officials.

The consideration of this question can not, however, be complete and full without reference to the negro race, its progress and its present condition. The thirteenth amendment secured them freedom; the fourteenth amendment due process of law, protection of property, and the pursuit of happiness; and the fifteenth amendment attempted to secure the negro against any deprivation of the privilege to vote because he was a negro. The thirteenth and fourteenth amendments have been generally enforced and have secured the objects for which they are intended. While the fifteenth amendment has not been generally observed in the past, it ought to be observed, and the tendency of Southern legislation today is toward the enactment of electoral qualifications which shall square with that amendment. Of course, the mere adoption of a constitutional law is only one step in the right direction. It must be fairly and justly enforced as well. In time both will come. Hence it is clear to all that the domination of an ignorant, irresponsible element can be prevented by constitutional laws which shall exclude from voting both negroes and whites not having education or other qualifications thought to be necessary for a proper electorate. The danger of the control of an ignorant electorate has therefore passed. With this change, the interest which many of the Southern white citizens take in the welfare of the negroes has increased. The colored men must base their hope on the results of their own industry, self-restraint, thrift, and business success, as well as upon the aid and comfort and sympathy which they may receive from their white neighbors of the South.

However, we can't fully address this question without discussing the black race, its progress, and its current situation. The thirteenth amendment granted them freedom; the fourteenth amendment ensured due process, property protection, and the pursuit of happiness; and the fifteenth amendment aimed to protect black individuals from losing their voting rights simply because of their race. The thirteenth and fourteenth amendments have generally been enforced and achieved their intended goals. While the fifteenth amendment has not been consistently upheld in the past, it should be, and Southern legislation today is moving towards creating voting qualifications that align with that amendment. Of course, just passing a constitutional law is only a step in the right direction. It needs to be enforced fairly and justly as well. In time, both will happen. So it's clear to everyone that the dominance of an uneducated, irresponsible group can be prevented by constitutional laws that would exclude from voting both blacks and whites who lack the education or other qualifications deemed necessary for a proper electorate. The threat of an uneducated electorate controlling the vote has, therefore, diminished. With this change, many Southern white citizens are increasingly interested in the welfare of black individuals. The colored community must focus their hopes on their own hard work, self-discipline, thrift, and business success, as well as the support, comfort, and empathy they may receive from their white neighbors in the South.

There was a time when Northerners who sympathized with the negro in his necessary struggle for better conditions sought to give him the suffrage as a protection to enforce its exercise against the prevailing sentiment of the South. The movement proved to be a failure. What remains is the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution and the right to have statutes of States specifying qualifications for electors subjected to the test of compliance with that amendment. This is a great protection to the negro. It never will be repealed, and it never ought to be repealed. If it had not passed, it might be difficult now to adopt it; but with it in our fundamental law, the policy of Southern legislation must and will tend to obey it, and so long as the statutes of the States meet the test of this amendment and are not otherwise in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, it is not the disposition or within the province of the Federal Government to interfere with the regulation by Southern States of their domestic affairs. There is in the South a stronger feeling than ever among the intelligent well-to-do, and influential element in favor of the industrial education of the negro and the encouragement of the race to make themselves useful members of the community. The progress which the negro has made in the last fifty years, from slavery, when its statistics are reviewed, is marvelous, and it furnishes every reason to hope that in the next twenty-five years a still greater improvement in his condition as a productive member of society, on the farm, and in the shop, and in other occupations may come.

There was a time when Northerners who empathized with the black community in their necessary fight for better conditions tried to give them the right to vote as a safeguard to ensure that it was exercised against the prevailing attitudes in the South. This movement ultimately failed. What remains is the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees the right to have state laws outlining qualifications for voters checked against that amendment. This serves as a significant protection for black individuals. It will never be repealed, and it should never be repealed. If it hadn't been enacted, it might be tough to adopt it now; but with it embedded in our fundamental law, the policies of Southern legislation must and will comply with it. As long as state laws align with this amendment and do not conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, it is not within the Federal Government's authority to interfere with how Southern states manage their internal affairs. There is a stronger sentiment than ever in the South among the educated, affluent, and influential groups in favor of providing industrial education for black individuals and encouraging the race to become productive members of the community. The progress that black individuals have made over the past fifty years, when assessed through statistics, is astonishing, and it gives every reason to believe that in the next twenty-five years, even greater advancements in their status as productive members of society, whether on farms, in shops, or in other careers, might occur.

The negroes are now Americans. Their ancestors came here years ago against their will, and this is their only country and their only flag. They have shown themselves anxious to live for it and to die for it. Encountering the race feeling against them, subjected at times to cruel injustice growing out of it, they may well have our profound sympathy and aid in the struggle they are making. We are charged with the sacred duty of making their path as smooth and easy as we can. Any recognition of their distinguished men, any appointment to office from among their number, is properly taken as an encouragement and an appreciation of their progress, and this just policy should be pursued when suitable occasion offers.

The Black community is now part of America. Their ancestors came here years ago against their will, and this is their only country and their only flag. They have demonstrated their willingness to live for it and to die for it. Facing racial bias against them and sometimes enduring cruel injustices stemming from it, they deserve our deep sympathy and support in their struggle. We have a sacred responsibility to make their journey as smooth and easy as possible. Recognizing their outstanding figures and appointing them to positions of authority is seen as encouragement and acknowledgment of their progress, and we should maintain this fair approach whenever the opportunity arises.

But it may well admit of doubt whether, in the case of any race, an appointment of one of their number to a local office in a community in which the race feeling is so widespread and acute as to interfere with the ease and facility with which the local government business can be done by the appointee is of sufficient benefit by way of encouragement to the race to outweigh the recurrence and increase of race feeling which such an appointment is likely to engender. Therefore the Executive, in recognizing the negro race by appointments, must exercise a careful discretion not thereby to do it more harm than good. On the other hand, we must be careful not to encourage the mere pretense of race feeling manufactured in the interest of individual political ambition.

But it’s worth questioning whether, in any racial community, appointing someone from that group to a local office—especially where racial tensions are strong enough to disrupt the smooth operation of local government—provides enough encouragement to outweigh the negative effects of heightened racial feelings that such an appointment might cause. Therefore, the Executive must exercise careful judgment when recognizing the black community through appointments, ensuring that it doesn’t result in more harm than good. At the same time, we need to be cautious not to promote a false sense of racial sentiment created solely for the sake of individual political ambitions.

Personally, I have not the slightest race prejudice or feeling, and recognition of its existence only awakens in my heart a deeper sympathy for those who have to bear it or suffer from it, and I question the wisdom of a policy which is likely to increase it. Meantime, if nothing is done to prevent it, a better feeling between the negroes and the whites in the South will continue to grow, and more and more of the white people will come to realize that the future of the South is to be much benefited by the industrial and intellectual progress of the negro. The exercise of political franchises by those of this race who are intelligent and well to do will be acquiesced in, and the right to vote will be withheld only from the ignorant and irresponsible of both races.

Personally, I don’t have any racial prejudice or feelings, and acknowledging its existence only stirs in me a deeper sympathy for those who have to endure it. I question the wisdom of a policy that is likely to make it worse. In the meantime, if nothing is done to stop it, positive feelings between black and white people in the South will keep growing, and more and more white people will realize that the South’s future will benefit greatly from the industrial and intellectual progress of black individuals. Those from this race who are intelligent and financially stable will be allowed to exercise their political rights, and the right to vote will only be denied to the ignorant and irresponsible members of both races.

There is one other matter to which I shall refer. It was made the subject of great controversy during the election and calls for at least a passing reference now. My distinguished predecessor has given much attention to the cause of labor, with whose struggle for better things he has shown the sincerest sympathy. At his instance Congress has passed the bill fixing the liability of interstate carriers to their employees for injury sustained in the course of employment, abolishing the rule of fellow-servant and the common-law rule as to contributory negligence, and substituting therefor the so-called rule of "comparative negligence." It has also passed a law fixing the compensation of government employees for injuries sustained in the employ of the Government through the negligence of the superior. It has also passed a model child-labor law for the District of Columbia. In previous administrations an arbitration law for interstate commerce railroads and their employees, and laws for the application of safety devices to save the lives and limbs of employees of interstate railroads had been passed. Additional legislation of this kind was passed by the outgoing Congress.

There’s one more thing I want to mention. It sparked a lot of debate during the election and deserves at least a brief mention now. My notable predecessor has focused heavily on labor issues, showing genuine support for their struggle for better conditions. At his suggestion, Congress passed a bill that holds interstate carriers responsible for injuries their employees suffer while working, ending the fellow-servant rule and the common-law rule on contributory negligence, and replacing them with the so-called "comparative negligence" rule. They also passed a law that sets compensation for government employees injured on the job due to their supervisor's negligence. Additionally, a child labor law for the District of Columbia was enacted. Previous administrations had already passed arbitration laws for interstate commerce railroads and their workers, as well as laws requiring safety devices to protect the lives and limbs of interstate railroad employees. The outgoing Congress approved even more legislation of this nature.

I wish to say that insofar as I can I hope to promote the enactment of further legislation of this character. I am strongly convinced that the Government should make itself as responsible to employees injured in its employ as an interstate-railway corporation is made responsible by federal law to its employees; and I shall be glad, whenever any additional reasonable safety device can be invented to reduce the loss of life and limb among railway employees, to urge Congress to require its adoption by interstate railways.

I want to express that as much as I can, I hope to encourage the passing of more laws like this. I firmly believe that the Government should be just as accountable to employees injured while working for it as an interstate railway company is required to be under federal law for its employees. I will be happy, whenever a new and reasonable safety device is developed to lessen the risk of injury or death among railway workers, to advocate for Congress to mandate its use by interstate railways.

Another labor question has arisen which has awakened the most excited discussion. That is in respect to the power of the federal courts to issue injunctions in industrial disputes. As to that, my convictions are fixed. Take away from the courts, if it could be taken away, the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes, and it would create a privileged class among the laborers and save the lawless among their number from a most needful remedy available to all men for the protection of their business against lawless invasion. The proposition that business is not a property or pecuniary right which can be protected by equitable injunction is utterly without foundation in precedent or reason. The proposition is usually linked with one to make the secondary boycott lawful. Such a proposition is at variance with the American instinct, and will find no support, in my judgment, when submitted to the American people. The secondary boycott is an instrument of tyranny, and ought not to be made legitimate.

Another labor issue has come up that has sparked intense debate. It concerns the ability of federal courts to issue injunctions in industrial disputes. I have strong beliefs about this matter. If you were to remove the courts' power to grant injunctions in labor disputes, it would create a privileged class among workers and protect the lawless individuals within their ranks from a crucial remedy available to everyone for safeguarding their businesses against unlawful interference. The idea that business isn't a property or financial right that can be protected by equitable injunctions is completely unfounded in precedent or logic. This idea is often connected to a proposal to legalize secondary boycotts. This proposal goes against the American ethos and, in my view, will not receive support from the American people. The secondary boycott is a tool of oppression and should not be legitimized.

The issue of a temporary restraining order without notice has in several instances been abused by its inconsiderate exercise, and to remedy this the platform upon which I was elected recommends the formulation in a statute of the conditions under which such a temporary restraining order ought to issue. A statute can and ought to be framed to embody the best modern practice, and can bring the subject so closely to the attention of the court as to make abuses of the process unlikely in the future. The American people, if I understand them, insist that the authority of the courts shall be sustained, and are opposed to any change in the procedure by which the powers of a court may be weakened and the fearless and effective administration of justice be interfered with.

The issue of issuing a temporary restraining order without notice has often been misused due to its careless application. To address this, the platform on which I was elected suggests creating a statute that clearly outlines the conditions under which such an order should be granted. A statute can and should be designed to reflect the best modern practices and can ensure that the subject receives the court’s close attention, making future abuses of the process unlikely. The American people, as I understand them, demand that the authority of the courts be upheld and are against any changes in procedures that could undermine a court's power or interfere with the fair and effective administration of justice.

Having thus reviewed the questions likely to recur during my administration, and having expressed in a summary way the position which I expect to take in recommendations to Congress and in my conduct as an Executive, I invoke the considerate sympathy and support of my fellow-citizens and the aid of the Almighty God in the discharge of my responsible duties.

Having looked over the issues that are likely to come up during my time in office, and having briefly outlined the stance I plan to take in my recommendations to Congress and in my role as an Executive, I ask for the understanding, sympathy, and support of my fellow citizens, as well as the help of Almighty God in fulfilling my important responsibilities.






WOODROW WILSON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1913

[Transcriber's note: The election of 1912 produced a Democratic victory over the split vote for President Taft's Republican ticket and Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party. The Governor of New Jersey and former Princeton University president was accompanied by President Taft to the Capitol. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico by Chief Justice Edward White.]

[Transcriber's note: The election of 1912 resulted in a Democratic win due to the divided votes between President Taft's Republican ticket and Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party. The Governor of New Jersey and former president of Princeton University was joined by President Taft at the Capitol. Chief Justice Edward White administered the oath of office on the East Portico.]


There has been a change of government. It began two years ago, when the House of Representatives became Democratic by a decisive majority. It has now been completed. The Senate about to assemble will also be Democratic. The offices of President and Vice-President have been put into the hands of Democrats. What does the change mean? That is the question that is uppermost in our minds to-day. That is the question I am going to try to answer, in order, if I may, to interpret the occasion.

There has been a change in government. It started two years ago when the House of Representatives became predominantly Democratic. It has now been finalized. The Senate, which is about to convene, will also be Democratic. The roles of President and Vice-President are now held by Democrats. What does this change mean? That’s the question that’s on everyone’s mind today. That’s the question I’m going to attempt to answer to help interpret this moment.

It means much more than the mere success of a party. The success of a party means little except when the Nation is using that party for a large and definite purpose. No one can mistake the purpose for which the Nation now seeks to use the Democratic Party. It seeks to use it to interpret a change in its own plans and point of view. Some old things with which we had grown familiar, and which had begun to creep into the very habit of our thought and of our lives, have altered their aspect as we have latterly looked critically upon them, with fresh, awakened eyes; have dropped their disguises and shown themselves alien and sinister. Some new things, as we look frankly upon them, willing to comprehend their real character, have come to assume the aspect of things long believed in and familiar, stuff of our own convictions. We have been refreshed by a new insight into our own life.

It means a lot more than just the success of a political party. The success of a party doesn’t mean much unless the Nation is using that party for a significant and clear purpose. There’s no misunderstanding what the Nation wants from the Democratic Party right now. It wants to use it to reflect a change in its own plans and perspective. Some old things we had become used to, that had started to seep into our thoughts and lives, now appear different as we look at them more critically and with fresh eyes; they’ve dropped their facades and revealed themselves as foreign and troubling. Some new things, when we examine them honestly and are ready to understand their true nature, have begun to look like beliefs we’ve held for a long time and are familiar, part of our own convictions. We have gained a fresh perspective on our own lives.

We see that in many things that life is very great. It is incomparably great in its material aspects, in its body of wealth, in the diversity and sweep of its energy, in the industries which have been conceived and built up by the genius of individual men and the limitless enterprise of groups of men. It is great, also, very great, in its moral force. Nowhere else in the world have noble men and women exhibited in more striking forms the beauty and the energy of sympathy and helpfulness and counsel in their efforts to rectify wrong, alleviate suffering, and set the weak in the way of strength and hope. We have built up, moreover, a great system of government, which has stood through a long age as in many respects a model for those who seek to set liberty upon foundations that will endure against fortuitous change, against storm and accident. Our life contains every great thing, and contains it in rich abundance.

We see that in many ways, life is incredibly significant. It is beyond compare in its material aspects, in its wealth, in its vast energy, and in the industries that have been imagined and developed by the ingenuity of individuals and the limitless drive of groups. It is also very great in its moral strength. Nowhere else in the world have noble men and women showcased the beauty and power of compassion, support, and advice in their efforts to right wrongs, ease suffering, and empower the weak with strength and hope. Additionally, we have created a robust system of government that has endured for a long time, serving as a model for those who aspire to establish liberty on foundations that withstand random change, storms, and accidents. Our life encompasses every significant aspect, and it does so in abundant richness.

But the evil has come with the good, and much fine gold has been corroded. With riches has come inexcusable waste. We have squandered a great part of what we might have used, and have not stopped to conserve the exceeding bounty of nature, without which our genius for enterprise would have been worthless and impotent, scorning to be careful, shamefully prodigal as well as admirably efficient. We have been proud of our industrial achievements, but we have not hitherto stopped thoughtfully enough to count the human cost, the cost of lives snuffed out, of energies overtaxed and broken, the fearful physical and spiritual cost to the men and women and children upon whom the dead weight and burden of it all has fallen pitilessly the years through. The groans and agony of it all had not yet reached our ears, the solemn, moving undertone of our life, coming up out of the mines and factories, and out of every home where the struggle had its intimate and familiar seat. With the great Government went many deep secret things which we too long delayed to look into and scrutinize with candid, fearless eyes. The great Government we loved has too often been made use of for private and selfish purposes, and those who used it had forgotten the people.

But with the good has come the bad, and much valuable gold has been tarnished. With wealth has come unforgivable waste. We’ve wasted a large part of what we could have used and haven’t taken the time to conserve the incredible gifts of nature, without which our entrepreneurial spirit would have been worthless and ineffective. We’ve been careless, extravagantly wasteful as well as impressively productive. We’ve taken pride in our industrial successes, but we haven’t paused long enough to consider the human cost—the lives lost, the exhausted and broken energies, the heavy physical and mental toll on the men, women, and children who have had to bear the crushing burden year after year. The pain and suffering of it all hadn’t yet reached our ears, the solemn, poignant background of our lives, rising from the mines and factories and from every home where the struggle was deeply felt. With the great Government came many deep-seated issues that we took too long to examine and scrutinize with honest, fearless eyes. The great Government we cherished has often been used for private and selfish ends, and those who wielded it had forgotten the people.

At last a vision has been vouchsafed us of our life as a whole. We see the bad with the good, the debased and decadent with the sound and vital. With this vision we approach new affairs. Our duty is to cleanse, to reconsider, to restore, to correct the evil without impairing the good, to purify and humanize every process of our common life without weakening or sentimentalizing it. There has been something crude and heartless and unfeeling in our haste to succeed and be great. Our thought has been "Let every man look out for himself, let every generation look out for itself," while we reared giant machinery which made it impossible that any but those who stood at the levers of control should have a chance to look out for themselves. We had not forgotten our morals. We remembered well enough that we had set up a policy which was meant to serve the humblest as well as the most powerful, with an eye single to the standards of justice and fair play, and remembered it with pride. But we were very heedless and in a hurry to be great.

Finally, we’ve gained a complete view of our lives. We recognize both the bad and the good, the corrupt and the decayed alongside what is healthy and vital. With this perspective, we tackle new issues. Our responsibility is to cleanse, rethink, restore, and correct the wrongs without damaging the good, to purify and humanize every aspect of our shared life without diluting or sentimentalizing it. There’s been something crude, heartless, and unfeeling in our rush to succeed and become great. Our mindset has been "Let everyone fend for themselves, let each generation look out for its own," while we built massive systems that only allowed those in control to truly look after themselves. We hadn't forgotten our morals. We clearly remembered that we established a system meant to serve both the humble and the powerful, focusing on justice and fairness, and we took pride in that. But we were careless and too eager to achieve greatness.

We have come now to the sober second thought. The scales of heedlessness have fallen from our eyes. We have made up our minds to square every process of our national life again with the standards we so proudly set up at the beginning and have always carried at our hearts. Our work is a work of restoration.

We have now arrived at a serious reflection. The blinders of carelessness have been lifted from our eyes. We have resolved to realign every aspect of our national life with the principles we proudly established at the start and have always held close to our hearts. Our task is one of restoration.

We have itemized with some degree of particularity the things that ought to be altered and here are some of the chief items: A tariff which cuts us off from our proper part in the commerce of the world, violates the just principles of taxation, and makes the Government a facile instrument in the hand of private interests; a banking and currency system based upon the necessity of the Government to sell its bonds fifty years ago and perfectly adapted to concentrating cash and restricting credits; an industrial system which, take it on all its sides, financial as well as administrative, holds capital in leading strings, restricts the liberties and limits the opportunities of labor, and exploits without renewing or conserving the natural resources of the country; a body of agricultural activities never yet given the efficiency of great business undertakings or served as it should be through the instrumentality of science taken directly to the farm, or afforded the facilities of credit best suited to its practical needs; watercourses undeveloped, waste places unreclaimed, forests untended, fast disappearing without plan or prospect of renewal, unregarded waste heaps at every mine. We have studied as perhaps no other nation has the most effective means of production, but we have not studied cost or economy as we should either as organizers of industry, as statesmen, or as individuals.

We’ve detailed some specific changes that need to be made, and here are some key points: A tariff that cuts us off from our rightful share in global trade, undermines fair taxation principles, and turns the Government into a tool for private interests; a banking and currency system based on the Government's need to sell bonds fifty years ago, which is designed to hoard cash and limit credit; an industrial system that, in every aspect—financial and administrative—keeps capital under tight control, restricts the freedoms and opportunities of workers, and exploits the country’s natural resources without replenishment or conservation; an agricultural sector that hasn’t been treated with the efficiency of major businesses or supported as it should be through direct application of science, or provided with the credit facilities that meet its real needs; undeveloped waterways, neglected lands, unmanaged forests that are disappearing without any plan for renewal, and overlooked waste piles at every mine. We have analyzed the most effective production methods perhaps better than any other nation, but we haven’t focused enough on cost or economic efficiency in our roles as industry organizers, statesmen, or individuals.

Nor have we studied and perfected the means by which government may be put at the service of humanity, in safeguarding the health of the Nation, the health of its men and its women and its children, as well as their rights in the struggle for existence. This is no sentimental duty. The firm basis of government is justice, not pity. These are matters of justice. There can be no equality or opportunity, the first essential of justice in the body politic, if men and women and children be not shielded in their lives, their very vitality, from the consequences of great industrial and social processes which they can not alter, control, or singly cope with. Society must see to it that it does not itself crush or weaken or damage its own constituent parts. The first duty of law is to keep sound the society it serves. Sanitary laws, pure food laws, and laws determining conditions of labor which individuals are powerless to determine for themselves are intimate parts of the very business of justice and legal efficiency.

We haven't studied and improved how government can support humanity by protecting the health of the nation—its men, women, and children—and their rights in the fight for survival. This isn't just a sentimental responsibility. The foundation of government is justice, not compassion. These issues are about justice. There can't be equality or opportunity, the first essentials of justice in a society, if men, women, and children aren't protected in their lives and well-being from the impacts of large industrial and social changes that they can't alter, control, or handle on their own. Society must ensure that it doesn't crush, weaken, or harm its own members. The primary duty of law is to maintain the well-being of the society it serves. Health laws, food safety laws, and laws governing working conditions—things individuals can't control by themselves—are essential parts of ensuring justice and legal effectiveness.

These are some of the things we ought to do, and not leave the others undone, the old-fashioned, never-to-be-neglected, fundamental safeguarding of property and of individual right. This is the high enterprise of the new day: To lift everything that concerns our life as a Nation to the light that shines from the hearthfire of every man's conscience and vision of the right. It is inconceivable that we should do this as partisans; it is inconceivable we should do it in ignorance of the facts as they are or in blind haste. We shall restore, not destroy. We shall deal with our economic system as it is and as it may be modified, not as it might be if we had a clean sheet of paper to write upon; and step by step we shall make it what it should be, in the spirit of those who question their own wisdom and seek counsel and knowledge, not shallow self-satisfaction or the excitement of excursions whither they can not tell. Justice, and only justice, shall always be our motto.

These are some of the things we need to do, and we shouldn’t neglect the others—the essential, timeless responsibility of protecting property and individual rights. This is the important mission of our new era: to bring everything that affects our lives as a Nation into the light of each person’s conscience and sense of what’s right. It’s unimaginable that we would do this as partisans; it’s unimaginable that we would do it without understanding the actual facts or in a rush. We will restore, not destroy. We will address our economic system as it is and how it can be improved, not as it could be if we had a blank slate to start from; and step by step, we will shape it into what it should be, in the spirit of those who question their own beliefs and seek insight and knowledge, not superficial self-satisfaction or the thrill of wandering aimlessly. Justice, and only justice, will always be our guiding principle.

And yet it will be no cool process of mere science. The Nation has been deeply stirred, stirred by a solemn passion, stirred by the knowledge of wrong, of ideals lost, of government too often debauched and made an instrument of evil. The feelings with which we face this new age of right and opportunity sweep across our heartstrings like some air out of God's own presence, where justice and mercy are reconciled and the judge and the brother are one. We know our task to be no mere task of politics but a task which shall search us through and through, whether we be able to understand our time and the need of our people, whether we be indeed their spokesmen and interpreters, whether we have the pure heart to comprehend and the rectified will to choose our high course of action.

And yet this won't just be a cold exercise in science. The nation has been deeply moved, stirred by a serious passion, driven by the awareness of injustice, lost ideals, and a government that has often been corrupted and used for evil. The emotions we feel as we enter this new era of justice and opportunity resonate within us like a breath from God's own presence, where justice and mercy come together, uniting the judge and the brother. We understand our mission is not just a political task, but a deep journey that will probe us to our core, testing whether we can truly grasp our time and the needs of our people, whether we are genuinely their voices and interpreters, and whether we possess the pure heart to understand and the strong will to choose our noble path forward.

This is not a day of triumph; it is a day of dedication. Here muster, not the forces of party, but the forces of humanity. Men's hearts wait upon us; men's lives hang in the balance; men's hopes call upon us to say what we will do. Who shall live up to the great trust? Who dares fail to try? I summon all honest men, all patriotic, all forward-looking men, to my side. God helping me, I will not fail them, if they will but counsel and sustain me!

This isn't a day of victory; it's a day of commitment. Let's gather not the powers of political parties, but the powers of humanity. People's hearts depend on us; lives are on the line; their hopes urge us to decide what actions we will take. Who will rise to meet this great responsibility? Who dares to not even try? I call on all honest people, all patriots, all those who look to the future, to join me. With God's help, I won't let them down if they will just guide and support me!






WOODROW WILSON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 5, 1917

[Transcriber's note: March 4 was a Sunday, but the President took the oath of office at the Capitol in the President's Room that morning. The oath was taken again the next day, administered by Chief Justice Edward White on the East Portico of the Capitol. The specter of war with Germany hung over the events surrounding the inauguration. A Senate filibuster on arming American merchant vessels against submarine attacks had closed the last hours of the Sixty-fourth Congress without passage. Despite the campaign slogan "He kept us out of war," the President asked Congress on April 2 to declare war. It was declared on April 6.]

[Transcriber's note: March 4 was a Sunday, but the President took the oath of office at the Capitol in the President's Room that morning. The oath was repeated the next day, administered by Chief Justice Edward White on the East Portico of the Capitol. The threat of war with Germany loomed over the events surrounding the inauguration. A Senate filibuster against arming American merchant ships in response to submarine attacks had consumed the final hours of the Sixty-fourth Congress without any legislation being passed. Despite the campaign slogan "He kept us out of war," the President asked Congress on April 2 to declare war. It was declared on April 6.]


My Fellow Citizens:

My fellow citizens:

The four years which have elapsed since last I stood in this place have been crowded with counsel and action of the most vital interest and consequence. Perhaps no equal period in our history has been so fruitful of important reforms in our economic and industrial life or so full of significant changes in the spirit and purpose of our political action. We have sought very thoughtfully to set our house in order, correct the grosser errors and abuses of our industrial life, liberate and quicken the processes of our national genius and energy, and lift our politics to a broader view of the people's essential interests.

The four years that have passed since I was last here have been filled with important discussions and actions that matter a lot. It’s hard to find a period in our history that has brought about as many significant changes in our economy and industry or so many meaningful shifts in our political goals and ideals. We’ve made a focused effort to organize ourselves, fix the major mistakes and issues in our industrial system, unleash and energize the creativity and drive of our nation, and elevate our political perspective to better align with the core interests of the people.

It is a record of singular variety and singular distinction. But I shall not attempt to review it. It speaks for itself and will be of increasing influence as the years go by. This is not the time for retrospect. It is time rather to speak our thoughts and purposes concerning the present and the immediate future.

It’s a remarkable work with a unique range and distinction. However, I won’t try to summarize it. It stands on its own and will continue to have more impact over time. This isn’t the moment for looking back. Instead, it’s time to share our thoughts and intentions about the present and near future.

Although we have centered counsel and action with such unusual concentration and success upon the great problems of domestic legislation to which we addressed ourselves four years ago, other matters have more and more forced themselves upon our attention—matters lying outside our own life as a nation and over which we had no control, but which, despite our wish to keep free of them, have drawn us more and more irresistibly into their own current and influence.

Although we've focused our guidance and efforts so intensely and successfully on the significant issues of domestic legislation that we tackled four years ago, other concerns have increasingly demanded our attention—issues beyond our own national life and over which we had no control. Yet, despite our desire to remain detached from them, they have pulled us more and more irresistibly into their influence.

It has been impossible to avoid them. They have affected the life of the whole world. They have shaken men everywhere with a passion and an apprehension they never knew before. It has been hard to preserve calm counsel while the thought of our own people swayed this way and that under their influence. We are a composite and cosmopolitan people. We are of the blood of all the nations that are at war. The currents of our thoughts as well as the currents of our trade run quick at all seasons back and forth between us and them. The war inevitably set its mark from the first alike upon our minds, our industries, our commerce, our politics and our social action. To be indifferent to it, or independent of it, was out of the question.

It has been impossible to escape them. They have impacted the lives of everyone around the globe. They have unsettled people everywhere with an intensity and worry they never experienced before. It has been tough to maintain a clear head while thinking about how our own people are swayed back and forth by their influence. We are a diverse and mixed community. We share the blood of all the nations that are at war. The flow of our thoughts, as well as our trade, moves quickly back and forth between us and them at all times. The war has inevitably left its mark from the beginning on our minds, our industries, our commerce, our politics, and our social activities. Ignoring it or separating ourselves from it was simply not an option.

And yet all the while we have been conscious that we were not part of it. In that consciousness, despite many divisions, we have drawn closer together. We have been deeply wronged upon the seas, but we have not wished to wrong or injure in return; have retained throughout the consciousness of standing in some sort apart, intent upon an interest that transcended the immediate issues of the war itself.

And yet, all this time, we’ve been aware that we didn’t belong to it. In that awareness, despite many differences, we’ve grown closer together. We’ve faced serious wrongs at sea, but we didn’t want to retaliate or cause harm in return; we’ve consistently recognized that we stood apart, focused on an interest that went beyond the immediate concerns of the war itself.

As some of the injuries done us have become intolerable we have still been clear that we wished nothing for ourselves that we were not ready to demand for all mankind—fair dealing, justice, the freedom to live and to be at ease against organized wrong.

As some of the injuries we've suffered have become unbearable, we've remained firm in our belief that we want nothing for ourselves that we're not willing to demand for all people—fair treatment, justice, and the freedom to live comfortably without facing organized wrongdoing.

It is in this spirit and with this thought that we have grown more and more aware, more and more certain that the part we wished to play was the part of those who mean to vindicate and fortify peace. We have been obliged to arm ourselves to make good our claim to a certain minimum of right and of freedom of action. We stand firm in armed neutrality since it seems that in no other way we can demonstrate what it is we insist upon and cannot forget. We may even be drawn on, by circumstances, not by our own purpose or desire, to a more active assertion of our rights as we see them and a more immediate association with the great struggle itself. But nothing will alter our thought or our purpose. They are too clear to be obscured. They are too deeply rooted in the principles of our national life to be altered. We desire neither conquest nor advantage. We wish nothing that can be had only at the cost of another people. We always professed unselfish purpose and we covet the opportunity to prove our professions are sincere.

It is with this mindset and belief that we've become more aware and more certain that our role is to support and strengthen peace. We’ve had to arm ourselves to uphold our basic rights and freedom of action. We maintain a position of armed neutrality because it seems to be the only way to show what we insist on and cannot forget. Circumstances may push us, against our own intentions or desires, toward a more active defense of our rights as we see them and a closer involvement in the larger struggle. But nothing will change our mindset or our goals. They are too clear to misunderstand. They are too deeply ingrained in the foundation of our national identity to change. We seek neither conquest nor advantage. We want nothing that can only come at the expense of another people. We’ve always claimed to have selfless intentions, and we wish for the chance to prove that our claims are genuine.

There are many things still to be done at home, to clarify our own politics and add new vitality to the industrial processes of our own life, and we shall do them as time and opportunity serve, but we realize that the greatest things that remain to be done must be done with the whole world for stage and in cooperation with the wide and universal forces of mankind, and we are making our spirits ready for those things.

There are still many things to take care of at home, to clarify our own politics and bring new energy to the everyday processes of our lives. We will tackle them as time and opportunities allow, but we understand that the most significant tasks ahead of us require a global stage and collaboration with the broad and universal forces of humanity. We are preparing ourselves for those challenges.

We are provincials no longer. The tragic events of the thirty months of vital turmoil through which we have just passed have made us citizens of the world. There can be no turning back. Our own fortunes as a nation are involved whether we would have it so or not.

We are no longer just locals. The tragic events of the past thirty months of intense turmoil have made us global citizens. There's no going back. Our own future as a nation is at stake whether we want it to be or not.

And yet we are not the less Americans on that account. We shall be the more American if we but remain true to the principles in which we have been bred. They are not the principles of a province or of a single continent. We have known and boasted all along that they were the principles of a liberated mankind. These, therefore, are the things we shall stand for, whether in war or in peace:

And yet we are still Americans because of that. We will be even more American if we stay true to the principles we were raised with. These principles aren’t just for a specific region or one continent. We have always known and proudly claimed that they are the principles of free people everywhere. So, these are the things we will support, whether in war or peace:

That all nations are equally interested in the peace of the world and in the political stability of free peoples, and equally responsible for their maintenance; that the essential principle of peace is the actual equality of nations in all matters of right or privilege; that peace cannot securely or justly rest upon an armed balance of power; that governments derive all their just powers from the consent of the governed and that no other powers should be supported by the common thought, purpose or power of the family of nations; that the seas should be equally free and safe for the use of all peoples, under rules set up by common agreement and consent, and that, so far as practicable, they should be accessible to all upon equal terms; that national armaments shall be limited to the necessities of national order and domestic safety; that the community of interest and of power upon which peace must henceforth depend imposes upon each nation the duty of seeing to it that all influences proceeding from its own citizens meant to encourage or assist revolution in other states should be sternly and effectually suppressed and prevented.

That all nations have a shared interest in global peace and the political stability of free peoples, and share equal responsibility for maintaining it; that the fundamental principle of peace is that nations are truly equal in all matters of rights and privileges; that peace cannot be justly or securely based on a military balance of power; that governments derive their legitimate powers from the consent of the governed, and that no other powers should be backed by the collective thoughts, goals, or strength of the global community; that the seas should be equally free and safe for everyone, governed by rules established through mutual agreement and consent, and that, where possible, they should be open to all on equal terms; that national military forces should be limited to what is necessary for domestic order and safety; and that the shared interests and power on which lasting peace relies requires every nation to ensure that any influences by its citizens aimed at promoting or supporting revolution in other countries are firmly and effectively suppressed.

I need not argue these principles to you, my fellow countrymen; they are your own part and parcel of your own thinking and your own motives in affairs. They spring up native amongst us. Upon this as a platform of purpose and of action we can stand together. And it is imperative that we should stand together. We are being forged into a new unity amidst the fires that now blaze throughout the world. In their ardent heat we shall, in God's Providence, let us hope, be purged of faction and division, purified of the errant humors of party and of private interest, and shall stand forth in the days to come with a new dignity of national pride and spirit. Let each man see to it that the dedication is in his own heart, the high purpose of the nation in his own mind, ruler of his own will and desire.

I don’t need to argue these principles with you, my fellow citizens; they are already a part of your own thinking and motivations in life. They arise naturally among us. This is the foundation of our purpose and action that we can all stand on together. It’s crucial that we stand united. We are being shaped into a new unity amidst the challenges that are currently affecting the world. Through those intense struggles, let’s hope, with God's help, we will be rid of conflict and division, cleansed of the misguided notions of party and individual interests, and emerge in the future with a renewed sense of national pride and spirit. Each person must ensure that this commitment is in their heart, with the nation’s high purpose in their mind, guiding their own will and desires.

I stand here and have taken the high and solemn oath to which you have been audience because the people of the United States have chosen me for this august delegation of power and have by their gracious judgment named me their leader in affairs.

I stand here and have taken the serious oath that you have witnessed because the people of the United States have chosen me for this important role of power and have, through their kind decision, named me their leader in matters.

I know now what the task means. I realize to the full the responsibility which it involves. I pray God I may be given the wisdom and the prudence to do my duty in the true spirit of this great people. I am their servant and can succeed only as they sustain and guide me by their confidence and their counsel. The thing I shall count upon, the thing without which neither counsel nor action will avail, is the unity of America—an America united in feeling, in purpose and in its vision of duty, of opportunity and of service.

I now understand what this job truly means. I fully realize the responsibility that comes with it. I pray to God that I’m given the wisdom and judgment to fulfill my duty in the true spirit of this great nation. I am their servant and can only succeed if they support and guide me with their trust and advice. What I will rely on, what is essential for both guidance and action, is the unity of America—an America united in emotion, purpose, and its vision of duty, opportunity, and service.

We are to beware of all men who would turn the tasks and the necessities of the nation to their own private profit or use them for the building up of private power.

We need to be cautious of anyone who would take the responsibilities and needs of the country for their own personal gain or use them to strengthen their own power.

United alike in the conception of our duty and in the high resolve to perform it in the face of all men, let us dedicate ourselves to the great task to which we must now set our hand. For myself I beg your tolerance, your countenance and your united aid.

United in our understanding of our duty and with a strong determination to fulfill it in front of everyone, let’s commit ourselves to the significant task we must undertake. For my part, I ask for your patience, your support, and your collective help.

The shadows that now lie dark upon our path will soon be dispelled, and we shall walk with the light all about us if we be but true to ourselves—to ourselves as we have wished to be known in the counsels of the world and in the thought of all those who love liberty and justice and the right exalted.

The shadows that are now dark on our path will soon fade away, and we will walk in light all around us if we stay true to ourselves—true to who we want to be recognized as in the discussions of the world and in the minds of all those who cherish freedom, justice, and what is right.






WARREN G. HARDING, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, MARCH 4, 1921

[Transcriber's note: Senator Harding from Ohio was the first sitting Senator to be elected President. A former newspaper publisher and Governor of Ohio, the President-elect rode to the Capitol with President Wilson in the first automobile to be used in an inauguration. President Wilson had suffered a stroke in 1919, and his fragile health prevented his attendance at the ceremony on the East Portico of the Capitol. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Edward White, using the Bible from George Washington's first inauguration. The address to the crowd at the Capitol was broadcast on a loudspeaker. A simple parade followed.]

[Transcriber's note: Senator Harding from Ohio was the first sitting Senator to be elected President. A former newspaper publisher and Governor of Ohio, the President-elect rode to the Capitol with President Wilson in the first car used for an inauguration. President Wilson had suffered a stroke in 1919, and his fragile health prevented him from attending the ceremony on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Edward White administered the oath of office, using the Bible from George Washington's first inauguration. The address to the crowd at the Capitol was broadcast on a speaker system. A simple parade followed.]


My Countrymen:

My Fellow Citizens:

When one surveys the world about him after the great storm, noting the marks of destruction and yet rejoicing in the ruggedness of the things which withstood it, if he is an American he breathes the clarified atmosphere with a strange mingling of regret and new hope. We have seen a world passion spend its fury, but we contemplate our Republic unshaken, and hold our civilization secure. Liberty—liberty within the law—and civilization are inseparable, and though both were threatened we find them now secure; and there comes to Americans the profound assurance that our representative government is the highest expression and surest guaranty of both.

When one looks around at the world after the big storm, seeing the signs of destruction but also appreciating the strength of the things that survived, if he is an American, he takes in the clear air with a mix of sadness and new hope. We have witnessed a global passion unleash its fury, but we see our Republic standing strong and our civilization safe. Liberty—liberty under the law—and civilization go hand in hand, and even though both were endangered, we now find them secure; and this brings Americans a deep confidence that our representative government is the best expression and strongest protection of both.

Standing in this presence, mindful of the solemnity of this occasion, feeling the emotions which no one may know until he senses the great weight of responsibility for himself, I must utter my belief in the divine inspiration of the founding fathers. Surely there must have been God's intent in the making of this new-world Republic. Ours is an organic law which had but one ambiguity, and we saw that effaced in a baptism of sacrifice and blood, with union maintained, the Nation supreme, and its concord inspiring. We have seen the world rivet its hopeful gaze on the great truths on which the founders wrought. We have seen civil, human, and religious liberty verified and glorified. In the beginning the Old World scoffed at our experiment; today our foundations of political and social belief stand unshaken, a precious inheritance to ourselves, an inspiring example of freedom and civilization to all mankind. Let us express renewed and strengthened devotion, in grateful reverence for the immortal beginning, and utter our confidence in the supreme fulfillment.

Standing here, aware of the seriousness of this moment, feeling emotions that only someone truly understands when they realize the heavy responsibility they bear, I must share my belief in the divine inspiration of our founding fathers. There must have been a higher purpose in creating this new-world Republic. Our laws are deeply rooted, with only one uncertainty, which was resolved through sacrifice and struggle, with unity preserved, the Nation thriving, and its harmony inspiring. We’ve watched as the world has turned its hopeful eyes toward the great truths established by the founders. We’ve seen civil, human, and religious freedoms upheld and celebrated. At first, the Old World mocked our experiment; today, our principles of political and social beliefs remain strong, a valuable legacy for ourselves and a shining example of freedom and civilization for all humanity. Let us renew and strengthen our commitment, with deep gratitude for our enduring beginnings, and express our faith in the ultimate fulfillment.

The recorded progress of our Republic, materially and spiritually, in itself proves the wisdom of the inherited policy of noninvolvement in Old World affairs. Confident of our ability to work out our own destiny, and jealously guarding our right to do so, we seek no part in directing the destinies of the Old World. We do not mean to be entangled. We will accept no responsibility except as our own conscience and judgment, in each instance, may determine.

The progress we’ve made as a Republic, both in terms of material wealth and spiritual growth, clearly shows the wisdom of our longstanding policy of staying out of Old World conflicts. We’re confident in our ability to shape our own future and are protective of that right; we have no desire to get involved in the affairs of the Old World. We don’t want to get caught up in complications. We will take on no responsibilities except those that our own conscience and judgment decide in each case.

Our eyes never will be blind to a developing menace, our ears never deaf to the call of civilization. We recognize the new order in the world, with the closer contacts which progress has wrought. We sense the call of the human heart for fellowship, fraternity, and cooperation. We crave friendship and harbor no hate. But America, our America, the America builded on the foundation laid by the inspired fathers, can be a party to no permanent military alliance. It can enter into no political commitments, nor assume any economic obligations which will subject our decisions to any other than our own authority.

Our eyes will never be blind to an emerging threat, and our ears will never be deaf to the call of civilization. We recognize the new world order, shaped by the closer connections that progress has created. We feel the human heart's longing for community, brotherhood, and collaboration. We desire friendship and hold no hatred. But America, our America, the America built on the foundation laid by our visionary founders, cannot be part of any permanent military alliance. It can take on no political commitments or economic obligations that would make our decisions dependent on anyone other than ourselves.

I am sure our own people will not misunderstand, nor will the world misconstrue. We have no thought to impede the paths to closer relationship. We wish to promote understanding. We want to do our part in making offensive warfare so hateful that Governments and peoples who resort to it must prove the righteousness of their cause or stand as outlaws before the bar of civilization.

I’m confident that our people will understand, and the world won’t misinterpret. We don’t intend to block the way to stronger relationships. We want to encourage understanding. We aim to contribute to making war so detestable that governments and people who resort to it must justify their cause or be seen as outlaws in the eyes of civilization.

We are ready to associate ourselves with the nations of the world, great and small, for conference, for counsel; to seek the expressed views of world opinion; to recommend a way to approximate disarmament and relieve the crushing burdens of military and naval establishments. We elect to participate in suggesting plans for mediation, conciliation, and arbitration, and would gladly join in that expressed conscience of progress, which seeks to clarify and write the laws of international relationship, and establish a world court for the disposition of such justiciable questions as nations are agreed to submit thereto. In expressing aspirations, in seeking practical plans, in translating humanity's new concept of righteousness and justice and its hatred of war into recommended action we are ready most heartily to unite, but every commitment must be made in the exercise of our national sovereignty. Since freedom impelled, and independence inspired, and nationality exalted, a world supergovernment is contrary to everything we cherish and can have no sanction by our Republic. This is not selfishness, it is sanctity. It is not aloofness, it is security. It is not suspicion of others, it is patriotic adherence to the things which made us what we are.

We are ready to connect with nations around the world, both big and small, for discussions and advice; to seek out the opinions of the global community; to suggest ways to achieve disarmament and ease the heavy burdens of military and naval forces. We choose to take part in proposing plans for mediation, reconciliation, and arbitration, and we would gladly join in the collective call for progress, which aims to clarify and establish the laws of international relations and create a world court for settling the disputes that nations agree to bring before it. By expressing our hopes, seeking practical plans, and turning humanity's new ideas about fairness and justice, along with its aversion to war, into concrete actions, we are eager to unite wholeheartedly, but every commitment must respect our national sovereignty. Since freedom drives us, and independence inspires us, and nationalism uplifts us, a world supergovernment contradicts everything we value and can have no support from our Republic. This is not selfishness; it is principle. It is not detachment; it is safety. It is not distrust of others; it is a patriotic commitment to the values that have shaped our identity.

Today, better than ever before, we know the aspirations of humankind, and share them. We have come to a new realization of our place in the world and a new appraisal of our Nation by the world. The unselfishness of these United States is a thing proven; our devotion to peace for ourselves and for the world is well established; our concern for preserved civilization has had its impassioned and heroic expression. There was no American failure to resist the attempted reversion of civilization; there will be no failure today or tomorrow.

Today, more than ever, we understand and share the hopes of humanity. We've reached a new understanding of our role in the world and how the world views our Nation. The selflessness of the United States is a proven fact; our commitment to peace for ourselves and for others is well known; our dedication to preserving civilization has been passionately and heroically demonstrated. There was no failure on the part of Americans to stand against attempts to roll back civilization, and there will be no failure today or tomorrow.

The success of our popular government rests wholly upon the correct interpretation of the deliberate, intelligent, dependable popular will of America. In a deliberate questioning of a suggested change of national policy, where internationality was to supersede nationality, we turned to a referendum, to the American people. There was ample discussion, and there is a public mandate in manifest understanding.

The success of our democratic government relies entirely on accurately understanding the thought-out, informed, and trustworthy will of the American people. In thoughtfully considering a proposed shift in national policy, where global interests would take precedence over national ones, we turned to a referendum to seek the opinion of the American public. There was plenty of discussion, and there is a clear public mandate based on a shared understanding.

America is ready to encourage, eager to initiate, anxious to participate in any seemly program likely to lessen the probability of war, and promote that brotherhood of mankind which must be God's highest conception of human relationship. Because we cherish ideals of justice and peace, because we appraise international comity and helpful relationship no less highly than any people of the world, we aspire to a high place in the moral leadership of civilization, and we hold a maintained America, the proven Republic, the unshaken temple of representative democracy, to be not only an inspiration and example, but the highest agency of strengthening good will and promoting accord on both continents.

America is ready to encourage, eager to take action, and anxious to get involved in any sensible program that might reduce the chances of war and promote a sense of brotherhood among humanity, which must be God's ultimate vision for human relationships. Because we value ideals of justice and peace, and because we regard international friendship and supportive relationships just as highly as any other nation in the world, we aim for a prominent role in the moral leadership of civilization. We believe that maintaining America, the proven Republic and the steadfast example of representative democracy, is not only an inspiration but also the greatest force for fostering goodwill and encouraging harmony on both continents.

Mankind needs a world-wide benediction of understanding. It is needed among individuals, among peoples, among governments, and it will inaugurate an era of good feeling to make the birth of a new order. In such understanding men will strive confidently for the promotion of their better relationships and nations will promote the comities so essential to peace.

Mankind needs a global blessing of understanding. It’s necessary among individuals, between nations, and among governments, and it will start an era of goodwill that will bring about a new order. In this understanding, people will confidently work towards better relationships, and nations will foster the cooperation that is essential for peace.

We must understand that ties of trade bind nations in closest intimacy, and none may receive except as he gives. We have not strengthened ours in accordance with our resources or our genius, notably on our own continent, where a galaxy of Republics reflects the glory of new-world democracy, but in the new order of finance and trade we mean to promote enlarged activities and seek expanded confidence.

We need to recognize that trade connections bring countries closer together, and no one can benefit without giving something back. We haven't developed our trade relationships to match our resources or abilities, especially on our own continent, where a group of Republics showcases the brilliance of new-world democracy. However, in this new era of finance and trade, we intend to boost our activities and build greater trust.

Perhaps we can make no more helpful contribution by example than prove a Republic's capacity to emerge from the wreckage of war. While the world's embittered travail did not leave us devastated lands nor desolated cities, left no gaping wounds, no breast with hate, it did involve us in the delirium of expenditure, in expanded currency and credits, in unbalanced industry, in unspeakable waste, and disturbed relationships. While it uncovered our portion of hateful selfishness at home, it also revealed the heart of America as sound and fearless, and beating in confidence unfailing.

Maybe the best way we can help is by showing that a Republic can rise from the ruins of war. Even though the world's bitter struggles didn't leave us with ruined lands or devastated cities, didn't create deep wounds or hatred, they did pull us into the frenzy of spending, into inflated currency and credits, into unsteady industries, into immense waste, and disrupted relationships. While it exposed our share of selfishness at home, it also showed that the heart of America is solid and brave, and beats with unwavering confidence.

Amid it all we have riveted the gaze of all civilization to the unselfishness and the righteousness of representative democracy, where our freedom never has made offensive warfare, never has sought territorial aggrandizement through force, never has turned to the arbitrament of arms until reason has been exhausted. When the Governments of the earth shall have established a freedom like our own and shall have sanctioned the pursuit of peace as we have practiced it, I believe the last sorrow and the final sacrifice of international warfare will have been written.

Amid all of this, we've captured the attention of the entire world with the selflessness and fairness of representative democracy, where our freedom has never engaged in aggressive warfare, never sought to expand territory through force, and never resorted to armed conflict until all other options were exhausted. When the governments of the world establish a freedom like ours and endorse the pursuit of peace as we have done, I believe that the last sorrow and the final sacrifice of international warfare will be a thing of the past.

Let me speak to the maimed and wounded soldiers who are present today, and through them convey to their comrades the gratitude of the Republic for their sacrifices in its defense. A generous country will never forget the services you rendered, and you may hope for a policy under Government that will relieve any maimed successors from taking your places on another such occasion as this.

Let me address the injured and wounded soldiers here today, and through you, express the Republic's gratitude for your sacrifices in its defense. A grateful nation will always remember the service you provided, and you can expect a government policy that will spare future injured soldiers from stepping into your roles in similar situations.

Our supreme task is the resumption of our onward, normal way. Reconstruction, readjustment, restoration all these must follow. I would like to hasten them. If it will lighten the spirit and add to the resolution with which we take up the task, let me repeat for our Nation, we shall give no people just cause to make war upon us; we hold no national prejudices; we entertain no spirit of revenge; we do not hate; we do not covet; we dream of no conquest, nor boast of armed prowess.

Our main job is to get back to our regular path. Reconstruction, readjustment, and restoration all need to come next. I want to speed these up. If it lifts our spirits and strengthens our determination to take on this task, let me say again for our Nation, we won't give anyone a legitimate reason to go to war with us; we don’t harbor any national biases; we have no desire for revenge; we don't hate; we don't envy; we seek no conquest, nor do we brag about our military strength.

If, despite this attitude, war is again forced upon us, I earnestly hope a way may be found which will unify our individual and collective strength and consecrate all America, materially and spiritually, body and soul, to national defense. I can vision the ideal republic, where every man and woman is called under the flag for assignment to duty for whatever service, military or civic, the individual is best fitted; where we may call to universal service every plant, agency, or facility, all in the sublime sacrifice for country, and not one penny of war profit shall inure to the benefit of private individual, corporation, or combination, but all above the normal shall flow into the defense chest of the Nation. There is something inherently wrong, something out of accord with the ideals of representative democracy, when one portion of our citizenship turns its activities to private gain amid defensive war while another is fighting, sacrificing, or dying for national preservation.

If, despite this mindset, war is forced upon us again, I sincerely hope we can find a way to unite our individual and collective strength and dedicate all of America, both materially and spiritually, body and soul, to national defense. I can envision the ideal republic, where every man and woman is called under the flag to serve in whatever capacity, military or civic, suits them best; where we can mobilize every plant, agency, or facility in a noble sacrifice for the country, and not a single dollar of war profit will benefit individuals, corporations, or any combination thereof, but all excess will go into the Nation's defense fund. It’s fundamentally wrong, and inconsistent with the ideals of representative democracy, when part of our citizens focuses on personal gain during wartime while others are fighting, sacrificing, or dying for the preservation of the nation.

Out of such universal service will come a new unity of spirit and purpose, a new confidence and consecration, which would make our defense impregnable, our triumph assured. Then we should have little or no disorganization of our economic, industrial, and commercial systems at home, no staggering war debts, no swollen fortunes to flout the sacrifices of our soldiers, no excuse for sedition, no pitiable slackerism, no outrage of treason. Envy and jealousy would have no soil for their menacing development, and revolution would be without the passion which engenders it.

From this universal service, a new unity of spirit and purpose will emerge, bringing a new sense of confidence and dedication that will make our defense unbreakable and our victory certain. We would see minimal disruption to our economic, industrial, and commercial systems at home, no overwhelming war debts, no inflated fortunes mocking the sacrifices of our soldiers, no justification for disloyalty, no shameful inactivity, and no acts of treason. Envy and jealousy would find no ground to thrive, and revolution would lack the fervor that fuels it.

A regret for the mistakes of yesterday must not, however, blind us to the tasks of today. War never left such an aftermath. There has been staggering loss of life and measureless wastage of materials. Nations are still groping for return to stable ways. Discouraging indebtedness confronts us like all the war-torn nations, and these obligations must be provided for. No civilization can survive repudiation.

A regret for the mistakes of yesterday must not, however, blind us to the tasks of today. War never left such an aftermath. There has been staggering loss of life and immense wastage of resources. Nations are still struggling to return to normalcy. Overwhelming debt confronts us like all the war-torn countries, and these obligations must be addressed. No civilization can survive rejection.

We can reduce the abnormal expenditures, and we will. We can strike at war taxation, and we must. We must face the grim necessity, with full knowledge that the task is to be solved, and we must proceed with a full realization that no statute enacted by man can repeal the inexorable laws of nature. Our most dangerous tendency is to expect too much of government, and at the same time do for it too little. We contemplate the immediate task of putting our public household in order. We need a rigid and yet sane economy, combined with fiscal justice, and it must be attended by individual prudence and thrift, which are so essential to this trying hour and reassuring for the future.

We can cut down on unnecessary spending, and we will. We can tackle war taxes, and we have to. We need to confront this tough reality, fully aware that this challenge must be resolved, and we must move forward knowing that no law made by humans can change the unyielding laws of nature. Our biggest risk is expecting too much from the government while contributing too little ourselves. We’re looking at the urgent task of getting our public finances sorted out. We need strict yet sensible budgeting, along with fair fiscal policies, and this needs to be supported by personal responsibility and frugality, which are crucial during this challenging time and reassuring for the future.

The business world reflects the disturbance of war's reaction. Herein flows the lifeblood of material existence. The economic mechanism is intricate and its parts interdependent, and has suffered the shocks and jars incident to abnormal demands, credit inflations, and price upheavals. The normal balances have been impaired, the channels of distribution have been clogged, the relations of labor and management have been strained. We must seek the readjustment with care and courage. Our people must give and take. Prices must reflect the receding fever of war activities. Perhaps we never shall know the old levels of wages again, because war invariably readjusts compensations, and the necessaries of life will show their inseparable relationship, but we must strive for normalcy to reach stability. All the penalties will not be light, nor evenly distributed. There is no way of making them so. There is no instant step from disorder to order. We must face a condition of grim reality, charge off our losses and start afresh. It is the oldest lesson of civilization. I would like government to do all it can to mitigate; then, in understanding, in mutuality of interest, in concern for the common good, our tasks will be solved. No altered system will work a miracle. Any wild experiment will only add to the confusion. Our best assurance lies in efficient administration of our proven system.

The business world shows the impact of war. This is where the essentials of material life flow. The economic system is complex and all its parts rely on each other, having endured the shocks and stresses from unusual demands, credit inflation, and price surges. The usual balances have been disrupted, distribution channels have become blocked, and the relationship between labor and management has become tense. We need to approach the necessary adjustments with care and bravery. Our people need to cooperate. Prices must align with the diminishing intensity of war activities. It’s possible we may never return to the previous wage levels because war always reshapes compensation, and the essentials of life will reveal their close connection, but we must work towards normalcy to achieve stability. The consequences won't be light or evenly spread; there's no way to make them so. There’s no quick route from chaos to order. We must confront a harsh reality, accept our losses, and begin anew. This is one of the oldest lessons of civilization. I want the government to do everything it can to ease the situation; then, through understanding, shared interests, and concern for the common good, we can tackle our challenges. No new system will work miracles. Any reckless experiment will only add to the confusion. Our best bet lies in the efficient management of our established system.

The forward course of the business cycle is unmistakable. Peoples are turning from destruction to production. Industry has sensed the changed order and our own people are turning to resume their normal, onward way. The call is for productive America to go on. I know that Congress and the Administration will favor every wise Government policy to aid the resumption and encourage continued progress.

The direction of the business cycle is clear. People are shifting from destruction to production. Industry has recognized the new reality, and our own people are ready to get back to their usual path forward. The message is for productive America to keep moving ahead. I believe that Congress and the Administration will support every sensible government policy to help with the recovery and promote ongoing progress.

I speak for administrative efficiency, for lightened tax burdens, for sound commercial practices, for adequate credit facilities, for sympathetic concern for all agricultural problems, for the omission of unnecessary interference of Government with business, for an end to Government's experiment in business, and for more efficient business in Government administration. With all of this must attend a mindfulness of the human side of all activities, so that social, industrial, and economic justice will be squared with the purposes of a righteous people.

I advocate for better administrative efficiency, reduced tax burdens, smart business practices, proper credit options, and a genuine concern for all agricultural issues. I call for less unnecessary government interference in business, an end to the government's experiments in business, and more effective management within government administration. Alongside all this, we must remain aware of the human aspect of everything we do to ensure that social, industrial, and economic justice aligns with the goals of a just society.

With the nation-wide induction of womanhood into our political life, we may count upon her intuitions, her refinements, her intelligence, and her influence to exalt the social order. We count upon her exercise of the full privileges and the performance of the duties of citizenship to speed the attainment of the highest state.

With the nationwide inclusion of women in our political life, we can rely on their intuitions, their insights, their intelligence, and their influence to elevate the social order. We expect them to fully exercise their rights and fulfill their responsibilities as citizens to help achieve the highest state.

I wish for an America no less alert in guarding against dangers from within than it is watchful against enemies from without. Our fundamental law recognizes no class, no group, no section; there must be none in legislation or administration. The supreme inspiration is the common weal. Humanity hungers for international peace, and we crave it with all mankind. My most reverent prayer for America is for industrial peace, with its rewards, widely and generally distributed, amid the inspirations of equal opportunity. No one justly may deny the equality of opportunity which made us what we are. We have mistaken unpreparedness to embrace it to be a challenge of the reality, and due concern for making all citizens fit for participation will give added strength of citizenship and magnify our achievement.

I want an America that is just as aware of threats from within as it is vigilant against outside enemies. Our fundamental law recognizes no class, no group, and no region; there should be none in legislation or administration. The highest motivation is the common good. Humanity yearns for global peace, and we desire it alongside all of mankind. My deepest prayer for America is for industrial peace, with its benefits widely and fairly shared, alongside the promise of equal opportunity. No one can fairly deny the equality of opportunity that has shaped us. We have mistakenly thought that being unprepared to embrace it is a challenge to reality, and genuine concern for ensuring all citizens are ready to participate will strengthen our citizenship and enhance our achievements.

If revolution insists upon overturning established order, let other peoples make the tragic experiment. There is no place for it in America. When World War threatened civilization we pledged our resources and our lives to its preservation, and when revolution threatens we unfurl the flag of law and order and renew our consecration. Ours is a constitutional freedom where the popular will is the law supreme and minorities are sacredly protected. Our revisions, reformations, and evolutions reflect a deliberate judgment and an orderly progress, and we mean to cure our ills, but never destroy or permit destruction by force.

If revolution is about overturning the established order, let other countries take on that tragic experiment. There's no room for it in America. When World War threatened civilization, we committed our resources and our lives to protect it, and when revolution threatens, we raise the flag of law and order and reaffirm our dedication. Our freedom is constitutional, where the will of the people is the highest law and minorities are deeply protected. Our changes, reforms, and progress reflect thoughtful decisions and orderly advancement, and we aim to fix our problems, but we will never destroy or allow destruction through force.

I had rather submit our industrial controversies to the conference table in advance than to a settlement table after conflict and suffering. The earth is thirsting for the cup of good will, understanding is its fountain source. I would like to acclaim an era of good feeling amid dependable prosperity and all the blessings which attend.

I'd prefer to bring our industry disputes to the conference table ahead of time rather than to a settlement table after conflict and suffering. The world is longing for goodwill, and understanding is its source. I'd like to celebrate a time of positive relations alongside steady prosperity and all the blessings that come with it.

It has been proved again and again that we cannot, while throwing our markets open to the world, maintain American standards of living and opportunity, and hold our industrial eminence in such unequal competition. There is a luring fallacy in the theory of banished barriers of trade, but preserved American standards require our higher production costs to be reflected in our tariffs on imports. Today, as never before, when peoples are seeking trade restoration and expansion, we must adjust our tariffs to the new order. We seek participation in the world's exchanges, because therein lies our way to widened influence and the triumphs of peace. We know full well we cannot sell where we do not buy, and we cannot sell successfully where we do not carry. Opportunity is calling not alone for the restoration, but for a new era in production, transportation and trade. We shall answer it best by meeting the demand of a surpassing home market, by promoting self-reliance in production, and by bidding enterprise, genius, and efficiency to carry our cargoes in American bottoms to the marts of the world.

It has been proven time and time again that we cannot maintain American standards of living and opportunity, nor hold our industrial leadership, while exposing our markets to global competition. There’s a tempting misconception in the idea of removing trade barriers, but maintaining American standards means that our higher production costs need to be reflected in tariffs on imports. Today, more than ever, as nations aim for trade restoration and growth, we must adapt our tariffs to the new reality. We seek to be part of the world’s exchanges because that’s our path to greater influence and the successes of peace. We know we cannot sell where we do not buy, and we can't sell effectively where we don't produce. Opportunity is calling not just for restoration but for a new era in production, transportation, and trade. We will respond best by meeting the demands of a robust domestic market, promoting self-sufficiency in production, and encouraging innovation, talent, and efficiency to transport our goods in American ships to markets around the globe.

We would not have an America living within and for herself alone, but we would have her self-reliant, independent, and ever nobler, stronger, and richer. Believing in our higher standards, reared through constitutional liberty and maintained opportunity, we invite the world to the same heights. But pride in things wrought is no reflex of a completed task. Common welfare is the goal of our national endeavor. Wealth is not inimical to welfare; it ought to be its friendliest agency. There never can be equality of rewards or possessions so long as the human plan contains varied talents and differing degrees of industry and thrift, but ours ought to be a country free from the great blotches of distressed poverty. We ought to find a way to guard against the perils and penalties of unemployment. We want an America of homes, illumined with hope and happiness, where mothers, freed from the necessity for long hours of toil beyond their own doors, may preside as befits the hearthstone of American citizenship. We want the cradle of American childhood rocked under conditions so wholesome and so hopeful that no blight may touch it in its development, and we want to provide that no selfish interest, no material necessity, no lack of opportunity shall prevent the gaining of that education so essential to best citizenship.

We don't want America to exist just for itself, but we want it to be self-reliant, independent, and continually noble, strong, and prosperous. With faith in our higher standards, built through constitutional freedom and maintained opportunities, we invite the world to reach the same heights. However, pride in our achievements doesn't mean our work is done. The common good is the goal of our national efforts. Wealth should not be an enemy of welfare; it should actually support it. There can never be complete equality in rewards or possessions as long as people have different talents and levels of hard work and thrift, but we should strive for a country free from the harsh realities of severe poverty. We need to find ways to protect against the risks and consequences of unemployment. We envision an America filled with homes, shining with hope and happiness, where mothers don't have to work long hours outside their homes and can take their rightful place in nurturing American families. We want American children to grow up under conditions so healthy and promising that nothing can harm their development, and we must ensure that no selfish interests, no material needs, and no lack of opportunity will prevent them from getting the education essential for being good citizens.

There is no short cut to the making of these ideals into glad realities. The world has witnessed again and again the futility and the mischief of ill-considered remedies for social and economic disorders. But we are mindful today as never before of the friction of modern industrialism, and we must learn its causes and reduce its evil consequences by sober and tested methods. Where genius has made for great possibilities, justice and happiness must be reflected in a greater common welfare.

There’s no shortcut to turning these ideals into joyful realities. The world has seen over and over how pointless and harmful poorly thought-out solutions are for social and economic issues. However, we’re more aware than ever of the tensions created by modern industry, and we need to understand its causes and lessen its negative impacts using careful and proven methods. Where creativity has opened up great possibilities, justice and happiness should be evident in a greater shared well-being.

Service is the supreme commitment of life. I would rejoice to acclaim the era of the Golden Rule and crown it with the autocracy of service. I pledge an administration wherein all the agencies of Government are called to serve, and ever promote an understanding of Government purely as an expression of the popular will.

Service is the ultimate commitment in life. I would be thrilled to celebrate the age of the Golden Rule and elevate it with the authority of service. I promise a leadership where all government agencies are dedicated to serving and fostering an understanding of government purely as a reflection of the people's will.

One cannot stand in this presence and be unmindful of the tremendous responsibility. The world upheaval has added heavily to our tasks. But with the realization comes the surge of high resolve, and there is reassurance in belief in the God-given destiny of our Republic. If I felt that there is to be sole responsibility in the Executive for the America of tomorrow I should shrink from the burden. But here are a hundred millions, with common concern and shared responsibility, answerable to God and country. The Republic summons them to their duty, and I invite co-operation.

One cannot be in this presence and ignore the huge responsibility we carry. The global turmoil has added significantly to our tasks. However, with this awareness comes a surge of determination, and we find comfort in believing in the destiny given to our Republic by God. If I thought that the Executive alone was responsible for the America of tomorrow, I would shy away from that burden. But there are a hundred million people, all sharing the same concerns and responsibilities, answerable to God and our country. The Republic calls on them to do their duty, and I invite everyone to work together.

I accept my part with single-mindedness of purpose and humility of spirit, and implore the favor and guidance of God in His Heaven. With these I am unafraid, and confidently face the future.

I embrace my role with a focused determination and a humble attitude, and I seek the support and guidance of God in Heaven. With these, I am fearless and face the future with confidence.

I have taken the solemn oath of office on that passage of Holy Writ wherein it is asked: "What doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" This I plight to God and country.

I have sworn an official oath on that passage from the Bible that asks: "What does the Lord require of you but to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God?" This I promise to God and my country.






CALVIN COOLIDGE, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1925

[Transcriber's note: In 1923 President Coolidge first took the oath of office, administered by his father, a justice of the peace and a notary, in his family's sitting room in Plymouth, Vermont. President Harding had died while traveling in the western States. A year later, the President was elected on the slogan "Keep Cool with Coolidge." Chief Justice William Howard Taft administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The event was broadcast to the nation by radio.]

[Transcriber's note: In 1923, President Coolidge first took the oath of office, administered by his father, a justice of the peace and a notary, in his family's sitting room in Plymouth, Vermont. President Harding had died while traveling in the western states. A year later, the President was elected with the slogan "Keep Cool with Coolidge." Chief Justice William Howard Taft administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The event was broadcast to the nation by radio.]


My Countrymen:

My fellow countrymen:

No one can contemplate current conditions without finding much that is satisfying and still more that is encouraging. Our own country is leading the world in the general readjustment to the results of the great conflict. Many of its burdens will bear heavily upon us for years, and the secondary and indirect effects we must expect to experience for some time. But we are beginning to comprehend more definitely what course should be pursued, what remedies ought to be applied, what actions should be taken for our deliverance, and are clearly manifesting a determined will faithfully and conscientiously to adopt these methods of relief. Already we have sufficiently rearranged our domestic affairs so that confidence has returned, business has revived, and we appear to be entering an era of prosperity which is gradually reaching into every part of the Nation. Realizing that we can not live unto ourselves alone, we have contributed of our resources and our counsel to the relief of the suffering and the settlement of the disputes among the European nations. Because of what America is and what America has done, a firmer courage, a higher hope, inspires the heart of all humanity.

No one can look at today's situation without seeing a lot that is satisfying and even more that is encouraging. Our country is leading the world in adjusting to the aftermath of the major conflict. Many of its challenges will weigh heavily on us for years, and we should expect to feel the secondary and indirect effects for some time. But we’re starting to understand more clearly what steps we should take, which solutions we need to implement, and what actions we must pursue for our recovery, and we’re showing a strong commitment to adopting these relief measures. Already, we’ve managed to reorganize our domestic affairs enough that confidence has returned, business is picking up, and it looks like we're entering a period of prosperity that is gradually touching every part of the nation. Understanding that we can’t just focus on ourselves, we’ve contributed our resources and advice to help those in need and to settle disputes among European nations. Because of what America is and what America has accomplished, there is a stronger courage and greater hope in the hearts of people everywhere.

These results have not occurred by mere chance. They have been secured by a constant and enlightened effort marked by many sacrifices and extending over many generations. We can not continue these brilliant successes in the future, unless we continue to learn from the past. It is necessary to keep the former experiences of our country both at home and abroad continually before us, if we are to have any science of government. If we wish to erect new structures, we must have a definite knowledge of the old foundations. We must realize that human nature is about the most constant thing in the universe and that the essentials of human relationship do not change. We must frequently take our bearings from these fixed stars of our political firmament if we expect to hold a true course. If we examine carefully what we have done, we can determine the more accurately what we can do.

These results didn't just happen by accident. They've come from consistent and thoughtful effort, marked by many sacrifices and spanning several generations. We can’t keep achieving these impressive successes in the future unless we keep learning from the past. It's essential to always keep the experiences of our country, both at home and abroad, in mind if we want to have a solid understanding of government. If we want to build new structures, we need to have a clear knowledge of the old foundations. We must remember that human nature is one of the most constant things in the universe and that the basics of human relationships don’t change. We should frequently use these fixed points in our political landscape to stay on the right path. By carefully examining what we've done, we can more accurately determine what we can do.

We stand at the opening of the one hundred and fiftieth year since our national consciousness first asserted itself by unmistakable action with an array of force. The old sentiment of detached and dependent colonies disappeared in the new sentiment of a united and independent Nation. Men began to discard the narrow confines of a local charter for the broader opportunities of a national constitution. Under the eternal urge of freedom we became an independent Nation. A little less than 50 years later that freedom and independence were reasserted in the face of all the world, and guarded, supported, and secured by the Monroe doctrine. The narrow fringe of States along the Atlantic seaboard advanced its frontiers across the hills and plains of an intervening continent until it passed down the golden slope to the Pacific. We made freedom a birthright. We extended our domain over distant islands in order to safeguard our own interests and accepted the consequent obligation to bestow justice and liberty upon less favored peoples. In the defense of our own ideals and in the general cause of liberty we entered the Great War. When victory had been fully secured, we withdrew to our own shores unrecompensed save in the consciousness of duty done.

We are at the start of the one hundred and fiftieth year since our national identity first made itself known through clear action with determination. The old feeling of being detached and dependent colonies faded away, replaced by the new feeling of a united and independent Nation. People began to move beyond the limits of local charters to embrace the broader possibilities of a national constitution. Driven by the unending desire for freedom, we became an independent Nation. Almost 50 years later, that freedom and independence were reaffirmed to the entire world, protected and upheld by the Monroe Doctrine. The small group of States along the Atlantic coast expanded their borders across the hills and plains of the continent until they reached the Pacific. We made freedom a birthright. We extended our reach to distant islands to protect our interests and took on the responsibility to grant justice and liberty to those less fortunate. In defense of our ideals and in support of the greater cause of liberty, we entered the Great War. Once victory was fully achieved, we returned to our shores, rewarded only by the sense of a duty fulfilled.

Throughout all these experiences we have enlarged our freedom, we have strengthened our independence. We have been, and propose to be, more and more American. We believe that we can best serve our own country and most successfully discharge our obligations to humanity by continuing to be openly and candidly, in tensely and scrupulously, American. If we have any heritage, it has been that. If we have any destiny, we have found it in that direction.

Throughout all these experiences, we've expanded our freedom and strengthened our independence. We have been, and will continue to be, more and more American. We believe that we can best serve our country and fulfill our responsibilities to humanity by being openly and honestly, intensely and carefully, American. If we have any heritage, it's that. If we have any destiny, we've discovered it in that direction.

But if we wish to continue to be distinctively American, we must continue to make that term comprehensive enough to embrace the legitimate desires of a civilized and enlightened people determined in all their relations to pursue a conscientious and religious life. We can not permit ourselves to be narrowed and dwarfed by slogans and phrases. It is not the adjective, but the substantive, which is of real importance. It is not the name of the action, but the result of the action, which is the chief concern. It will be well not to be too much disturbed by the thought of either isolation or entanglement of pacifists and militarists. The physical configuration of the earth has separated us from all of the Old World, but the common brotherhood of man, the highest law of all our being, has united us by inseparable bonds with all humanity. Our country represents nothing but peaceful intentions toward all the earth, but it ought not to fail to maintain such a military force as comports with the dignity and security of a great people. It ought to be a balanced force, intensely modern, capable of defense by sea and land, beneath the surface and in the air. But it should be so conducted that all the world may see in it, not a menace, but an instrument of security and peace.

But if we want to remain distinctly American, we need to ensure that the term is broad enough to include the legitimate aspirations of a civilized and enlightened society committed to pursuing a conscientious and spiritual life in all its relationships. We can’t allow ourselves to be limited and diminished by catchy slogans and phrases. It’s not the adjectives that matter, but the substance. What’s important is not the name of the action but the outcome of the action. We shouldn't be overly disturbed by the idea of isolation or the involvement of pacifists and militarists. The physical layout of the earth has kept us separate from the Old World, but the shared brotherhood of humanity, the highest law of our existence, has connected us with all people through unbreakable ties. Our country stands for peaceful intentions toward the world, but it should not neglect to maintain a military force that aligns with the dignity and security of a great nation. This force should be balanced, highly modern, and capable of defending both land and sea, as well as underground and in the air. However, it should be managed in such a way that the entire world sees it not as a threat, but as a means of security and peace.

This Nation believes thoroughly in an honorable peace under which the rights of its citizens are to be everywhere protected. It has never found that the necessary enjoyment of such a peace could be maintained only by a great and threatening array of arms. In common with other nations, it is now more determined than ever to promote peace through friendliness and good will, through mutual understandings and mutual forbearance. We have never practiced the policy of competitive armaments. We have recently committed ourselves by covenants with the other great nations to a limitation of our sea power. As one result of this, our Navy ranks larger, in comparison, than it ever did before. Removing the burden of expense and jealousy, which must always accrue from a keen rivalry, is one of the most effective methods of diminishing that unreasonable hysteria and misunderstanding which are the most potent means of fomenting war. This policy represents a new departure in the world. It is a thought, an ideal, which has led to an entirely new line of action. It will not be easy to maintain. Some never moved from their old positions, some are constantly slipping back to the old ways of thought and the old action of seizing a musket and relying on force. America has taken the lead in this new direction, and that lead America must continue to hold. If we expect others to rely on our fairness and justice we must show that we rely on their fairness and justice.

This nation firmly believes in a just peace where the rights of its citizens are protected everywhere. It has never found that the necessary enjoyment of such peace could be maintained solely through a large and intimidating display of weapons. Like other nations, it is now more committed than ever to fostering peace through friendliness and good will, mutual understanding, and mutual patience. We have never followed a policy of competitive armament. Recently, we have agreed with other major nations to limit our naval power. As a result, our Navy is now larger in proportion than it ever was before. Eliminating the burden of expense and jealousy that always comes from intense rivalry is one of the most effective ways to reduce the unnecessary hysteria and misunderstandings that are the biggest drivers of war. This policy marks a new direction in the world. It represents an idea that has led to completely new actions. It won’t be easy to uphold. Some have never changed their views, and some continually slide back to their old habits of grabbing a weapon and relying on force. America has taken the lead in this new direction, and it must continue to do so. If we want others to trust in our fairness and justice, we must demonstrate that we trust in theirs.

If we are to judge by past experience, there is much to be hoped for in international relations from frequent conferences and consultations. We have before us the beneficial results of the Washington conference and the various consultations recently held upon European affairs, some of which were in response to our suggestions and in some of which we were active participants. Even the failures can not but be accounted useful and an immeasurable advance over threatened or actual warfare. I am strongly in favor of continuation of this policy, whenever conditions are such that there is even a promise that practical and favorable results might be secured.

If we look at past experiences, we can be optimistic about international relations through regular conferences and discussions. We can see the positive outcomes from the Washington conference and the various recent discussions on European issues, some of which were initiated by us, and in others, we actively participated. Even the setbacks are still considered useful and a significant improvement compared to the threats or realities of war. I fully support continuing this approach whenever the conditions suggest that we might achieve practical and positive results.

In conformity with the principle that a display of reason rather than a threat of force should be the determining factor in the intercourse among nations, we have long advocated the peaceful settlement of disputes by methods of arbitration and have negotiated many treaties to secure that result. The same considerations should lead to our adherence to the Permanent Court of International Justice. Where great principles are involved, where great movements are under way which promise much for the welfare of humanity by reason of the very fact that many other nations have given such movements their actual support, we ought not to withhold our own sanction because of any small and inessential difference, but only upon the ground of the most important and compelling fundamental reasons. We can not barter away our independence or our sovereignty, but we ought to engage in no refinements of logic, no sophistries, and no subterfuges, to argue away the undoubted duty of this country by reason of the might of its numbers, the power of its resources, and its position of leadership in the world, actively and comprehensively to signify its approval and to bear its full share of the responsibility of a candid and disinterested attempt at the establishment of a tribunal for the administration of even-handed justice between nation and nation. The weight of our enormous influence must be cast upon the side of a reign not of force but of law and trial, not by battle but by reason.

In line with the idea that reason, not force, should guide how nations interact, we have long supported resolving disputes through arbitration and have negotiated numerous treaties to achieve this aim. These same principles should motivate us to support the Permanent Court of International Justice. When significant principles are at stake, and when major movements that benefit humanity are gaining support from many nations, we shouldn't hold back our endorsement over minor, unimportant differences, but rather only for the most serious and compelling reasons. We cannot trade away our independence or sovereignty, but we shouldn’t get caught up in elaborate arguments or evasions to ignore our clear duty—due to our population, resources, and global leadership—to actively and fully express our approval and take responsibility for a genuine and unbiased effort to establish a court that ensures fair justice between nations. We must use our vast influence to promote a society governed by law and reason, not by force or conflict.

We have never any wish to interfere in the political conditions of any other countries. Especially are we determined not to become implicated in the political controversies of the Old World. With a great deal of hesitation, we have responded to appeals for help to maintain order, protect life and property, and establish responsible government in some of the small countries of the Western Hemisphere. Our private citizens have advanced large sums of money to assist in the necessary financing and relief of the Old World. We have not failed, nor shall we fail to respond, whenever necessary to mitigate human suffering and assist in the rehabilitation of distressed nations. These, too, are requirements which must be met by reason of our vast powers and the place we hold in the world.

We have never had any desire to interfere in the political situations of other countries. We are especially determined not to get involved in the political disputes of the Old World. With a lot of hesitation, we have answered calls for help to maintain order, protect lives and property, and establish responsible government in some of the smaller countries of the Western Hemisphere. Our private citizens have contributed significant amounts of money to help finance and provide relief for the Old World. We have not failed, nor will we fail, to respond whenever necessary to alleviate human suffering and assist in the recovery of struggling nations. These are also obligations we must fulfill because of our great power and the role we play in the world.

Some of the best thought of mankind has long been seeking for a formula for permanent peace. Undoubtedly the clarification of the principles of international law would be helpful, and the efforts of scholars to prepare such a work for adoption by the various nations should have our sympathy and support. Much may be hoped for from the earnest studies of those who advocate the outlawing of aggressive war. But all these plans and preparations, these treaties and covenants, will not of themselves be adequate. One of the greatest dangers to peace lies in the economic pressure to which people find themselves subjected. One of the most practical things to be done in the world is to seek arrangements under which such pressure may be removed, so that opportunity may be renewed and hope may be revived. There must be some assurance that effort and endeavor will be followed by success and prosperity. In the making and financing of such adjustments there is not only an opportunity, but a real duty, for America to respond with her counsel and her resources. Conditions must be provided under which people can make a living and work out of their difficulties. But there is another element, more important than all, without which there can not be the slightest hope of a permanent peace. That element lies in the heart of humanity. Unless the desire for peace be cherished there, unless this fundamental and only natural source of brotherly love be cultivated to its highest degree, all artificial efforts will be in vain. Peace will come when there is realization that only under a reign of law, based on righteousness and supported by the religious conviction of the brotherhood of man, can there be any hope of a complete and satisfying life. Parchment will fail, the sword will fail, it is only the spiritual nature of man that can be triumphant.

Some of the best minds have long been searching for a way to achieve lasting peace. Clearly, clarifying the principles of international law would be beneficial, and we should support the efforts of scholars working to create such a framework for the various nations to adopt. There is much to be gained from the dedicated studies of those advocating against aggressive war. However, all these plans, treaties, and agreements won't be enough on their own. One of the biggest threats to peace comes from the economic pressures people face. One of the most practical things we can do is find ways to alleviate that pressure, allowing for renewed opportunities and restored hope. There needs to be some assurance that hard work and effort can lead to success and prosperity. In creating and funding these adjustments, America has not only an opportunity but a real responsibility to offer guidance and resources. We must ensure that conditions are set so people can earn a living and overcome their challenges. However, there is another critical element, more important than everything else, without which there is no real hope for lasting peace. That element resides in the heart of humanity. Unless the desire for peace is nurtured there, and unless this fundamental source of brotherly love is cultivated to its fullest, all artificial efforts will be in vain. Peace will only come when we understand that true hope for a complete and fulfilling life can only exist under a rule of law based on righteousness and supported by a collective belief in the brotherhood of mankind. Agreements will fail, weapons will fail; only the spiritual nature of humanity can ultimately prevail.

It seems altogether probable that we can contribute most to these important objects by maintaining our position of political detachment and independence. We are not identified with any Old World interests. This position should be made more and more clear in our relations with all foreign countries. We are at peace with all of them. Our program is never to oppress, but always to assist. But while we do justice to others, we must require that justice be done to us. With us a treaty of peace means peace, and a treaty of amity means amity. We have made great contributions to the settlement of contentious differences in both Europe and Asia. But there is a very definite point beyond which we can not go. We can only help those who help themselves. Mindful of these limitations, the one great duty that stands out requires us to use our enormous powers to trim the balance of the world.

It seems very likely that we can best contribute to these important goals by staying politically neutral and independent. We don’t align ourselves with any Old World interests. This stance should be increasingly clear in our relationships with all foreign countries. We are at peace with all of them. Our mission is never to oppress, but always to assist. However, while we deliver justice to others, we must ensure that justice is done for us as well. For us, a peace treaty means peace, and a friendship treaty means friendship. We have made significant contributions to resolving disputes in both Europe and Asia. However, there is a clear limit to how far we can go. We can only help those who help themselves. Keeping these limitations in mind, our primary duty is to use our immense power to restore balance in the world.

While we can look with a great deal of pleasure upon what we have done abroad, we must remember that our continued success in that direction depends upon what we do at home. Since its very outset, it has been found necessary to conduct our Government by means of political parties. That system would not have survived from generation to generation if it had not been fundamentally sound and provided the best instrumentalities for the most complete expression of the popular will. It is not necessary to claim that it has always worked perfectly. It is enough to know that nothing better has been devised. No one would deny that there should be full and free expression and an opportunity for independence of action within the party. There is no salvation in a narrow and bigoted partisanship. But if there is to be responsible party government, the party label must be something more than a mere device for securing office. Unless those who are elected under the same party designation are willing to assume sufficient responsibility and exhibit sufficient loyalty and coherence, so that they can cooperate with each other in the support of the broad general principles, of the party platform, the election is merely a mockery, no decision is made at the polls, and there is no representation of the popular will. Common honesty and good faith with the people who support a party at the polls require that party, when it enters office, to assume the control of that portion of the Government to which it has been elected. Any other course is bad faith and a violation of the party pledges.

While we can take great pride in what we’ve accomplished internationally, we must remember that our ongoing success in that area depends on what we do domestically. From the very beginning, it has been necessary to run our Government through political parties. This system wouldn’t have lasted through the generations if it weren't fundamentally sound and provided the best means for fully expressing the will of the people. It’s not necessary to argue that it has always functioned perfectly. It’s enough to recognize that nothing better has been created. No one would deny that there should be open and honest expression and opportunities for independent action within the party. There’s no future in a narrow-minded and intolerant partisanship. However, for responsible party governance to exist, the party label must mean more than just a strategy for gaining office. Unless those elected under the same party banner are willing to take on enough responsibility and show enough loyalty and unity to support the broad general principles of the party platform, the election is simply a farce, no real decision is made at the polls, and there is no true representation of the people's will. Basic honesty and integrity with the voters who support a party require that the party, once in office, takes control of the part of the Government for which it was elected. Any other approach is dishonest and a breach of the party's commitments.

When the country has bestowed its confidence upon a party by making it a majority in the Congress, it has a right to expect such unity of action as will make the party majority an effective instrument of government. This Administration has come into power with a very clear and definite mandate from the people. The expression of the popular will in favor of maintaining our constitutional guarantees was overwhelming and decisive. There was a manifestation of such faith in the integrity of the courts that we can consider that issue rejected for some time to come. Likewise, the policy of public ownership of railroads and certain electric utilities met with unmistakable defeat. The people declared that they wanted their rights to have not a political but a judicial determination, and their independence and freedom continued and supported by having the ownership and control of their property, not in the Government, but in their own hands. As they always do when they have a fair chance, the people demonstrated that they are sound and are determined to have a sound government.

When the country has given its trust to a party by making it the majority in Congress, it has a right to expect that the party will act in unity to become an effective governing force. This Administration has taken office with a clear and specific mandate from the people. The overwhelming expression of public support for maintaining our constitutional guarantees was decisive. There was such strong faith in the integrity of the courts that we can consider that issue settled for the foreseeable future. Similarly, the idea of public ownership of railroads and certain electric utilities faced a clear rejection. The people made it clear that they wanted their rights to be determined judicially, not politically, and their independence and freedom were maintained by keeping ownership and control of their property in their own hands, not in the Government's. As they always do when given a fair chance, the people showed that they are sensible and committed to having a sound government.

When we turn from what was rejected to inquire what was accepted, the policy that stands out with the greatest clearness is that of economy in public expenditure with reduction and reform of taxation. The principle involved in this effort is that of conservation. The resources of this country are almost beyond computation. No mind can comprehend them. But the cost of our combined governments is likewise almost beyond definition. Not only those who are now making their tax returns, but those who meet the enhanced cost of existence in their monthly bills, know by hard experience what this great burden is and what it does. No matter what others may want, these people want a drastic economy. They are opposed to waste. They know that extravagance lengthens the hours and diminishes the rewards of their labor. I favor the policy of economy, not because I wish to save money, but because I wish to save people. The men and women of this country who toil are the ones who bear the cost of the Government. Every dollar that we carelessly waste means that their life will be so much the more meager. Every dollar that we prudently save means that their life will be so much the more abundant. Economy is idealism in its most practical form.

When we shift our focus from what was rejected to what was accepted, the policy that stands out most clearly is the emphasis on reducing public spending and reforming taxes. The core idea behind this effort is conservation. The resources of this country are nearly unimaginable. No one can fully grasp them. But the cost of our combined governments is also incredibly difficult to define. Not only those who are currently filing their tax returns, but also those who are dealing with rising living costs in their monthly bills, know all too well the weight of this significant burden and its impact. Regardless of what others may desire, these individuals want severe cuts in spending. They oppose waste. They understand that extravagance prolongs their work hours and reduces the rewards they receive for their labor. I support the policy of fiscal responsibility, not because I want to hoard money, but because I want to protect people. The men and women of this country who work hard are the ones who ultimately pay for the government. Every dollar we squander thoughtlessly means that their lives will be that much harder. Every dollar we wisely save means that their lives will be that much richer. Economy is idealism in its most practical form.

If extravagance were not reflected in taxation, and through taxation both directly and indirectly injuriously affecting the people, it would not be of so much consequence. The wisest and soundest method of solving our tax problem is through economy. Fortunately, of all the great nations this country is best in a position to adopt that simple remedy. We do not any longer need wartime revenues. The collection of any taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to the public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. The only constitutional tax is the tax which ministers to public necessity. The property of the country belongs to the people of the country. Their title is absolute. They do not support any privileged class; they do not need to maintain great military forces; they ought not to be burdened with a great array of public employees. They are not required to make any contribution to Government expenditures except that which they voluntarily assess upon themselves through the action of their own representatives. Whenever taxes become burdensome a remedy can be applied by the people; but if they do not act for themselves, no one can be very successful in acting for them.

If extravagance didn't show up in taxes, and if taxes weren't harmful to the people both directly and indirectly, it wouldn't be such a big deal. The smartest and most effective way to tackle our tax issue is through cutting back on spending. Luckily, among all the major nations, this country is in the best position to adopt that straightforward solution. We no longer need the revenue we got during wartime. Collecting any taxes that aren't absolutely necessary, and that don't clearly benefit the public, is just a form of legalized theft. In this republic, the rewards of hard work belong to those who earn them. The only constitutional tax is the one that addresses public needs. The country's resources belong to its citizens. Their ownership is complete. They shouldn't support any privileged class; they don't need to maintain large military forces; and they shouldn't be weighed down with too many public employees. They are only required to contribute to government expenses through what they willingly agree upon with their representatives. When taxes become a burden, the people can seek a remedy; but if they don't take action for themselves, no one else can effectively act on their behalf.

The time is arriving when we can have further tax reduction, when, unless we wish to hamper the people in their right to earn a living, we must have tax reform. The method of raising revenue ought not to impede the transaction of business; it ought to encourage it. I am opposed to extremely high rates, because they produce little or no revenue, because they are bad for the country, and, finally, because they are wrong. We can not finance the country, we can not improve social conditions, through any system of injustice, even if we attempt to inflict it upon the rich. Those who suffer the most harm will be the poor. This country believes in prosperity. It is absurd to suppose that it is envious of those who are already prosperous. The wise and correct course to follow in taxation and all other economic legislation is not to destroy those who have already secured success but to create conditions under which every one will have a better chance to be successful. The verdict of the country has been given on this question. That verdict stands. We shall do well to heed it.

The time is coming when we can implement more tax cuts. If we don't want to hinder people's right to earn a living, we need tax reform. The way we generate revenue shouldn't obstruct business; it should support it. I am against extremely high tax rates because they generate little to no revenue, they're bad for the country, and, quite frankly, they are unjust. We can't fund the nation or improve social conditions through any unfair system, even if we try to impose it on the wealthy. The ones who will suffer the most are the poor. This country believes in prosperity. It's silly to think it resents those who are already doing well. The smart and right approach to taxation and all other economic laws is not to take down those who have achieved success but to create conditions where everyone has a better chance to succeed. The country's verdict on this issue has been made, and it remains. We would do well to pay attention to it.

These questions involve moral issues. We need not concern ourselves much about the rights of property if we will faithfully observe the rights of persons. Under our institutions their rights are supreme. It is not property but the right to hold property, both great and small, which our Constitution guarantees. All owners of property are charged with a service. These rights and duties have been revealed, through the conscience of society, to have a divine sanction. The very stability of our society rests upon production and conservation. For individuals or for governments to waste and squander their resources is to deny these rights and disregard these obligations. The result of economic dissipation to a nation is always moral decay.

These questions deal with moral issues. We shouldn't worry too much about property rights if we are committed to respecting people's rights. In our system, those rights are paramount. It's not just property, but the right to own property, whether large or small, that our Constitution protects. All property owners have a responsibility. These rights and duties have been acknowledged, through society’s conscience, to have a divine approval. The very stability of our society depends on production and preservation. When individuals or governments waste and misuse their resources, they are ignoring these rights and responsibilities. The outcome of economic wastefulness for a nation is always moral decline.

These policies of better international understandings, greater economy, and lower taxes have contributed largely to peaceful and prosperous industrial relations. Under the helpful influences of restrictive immigration and a protective tariff, employment is plentiful, the rate of pay is high, and wage earners are in a state of contentment seldom before seen. Our transportation systems have been gradually recovering and have been able to meet all the requirements of the service. Agriculture has been very slow in reviving, but the price of cereals at last indicates that the day of its deliverance is at hand.

These policies of improved international relations, increased economic stability, and lower taxes have played a big role in fostering peaceful and successful industrial relations. Thanks to restrictive immigration and protective tariffs, there are plenty of jobs available, wages are high, and workers are experiencing a level of satisfaction that hasn’t been seen in a long time. Our transportation systems have been gradually bouncing back and can now meet all the service demands. Agriculture has been slow to recover, but the rising prices of cereal crops finally suggest that relief is on the way.

We are not without our problems, but our most important problem is not to secure new advantages but to maintain those which we already possess. Our system of government made up of three separate and independent departments, our divided sovereignty composed of Nation and State, the matchless wisdom that is enshrined in our Constitution, all these need constant effort and tireless vigilance for their protection and support.

We have our issues, but the biggest issue isn’t gaining new advantages; it’s keeping what we already have. Our system of government, which consists of three separate and independent branches, our shared sovereignty between Nation and State, and the incredible wisdom found in our Constitution—all of these require constant effort and relentless vigilance to protect and support.

In a republic the first rule for the guidance of the citizen is obedience to law. Under a despotism the law may be imposed upon the subject. He has no voice in its making, no influence in its administration, it does not represent him. Under a free government the citizen makes his own laws, chooses his own administrators, which do represent him. Those who want their rights respected under the Constitution and the law ought to set the example themselves of observing the Constitution and the law. While there may be those of high intelligence who violate the law at times, the barbarian and the defective always violate it. Those who disregard the rules of society are not exhibiting a superior intelligence, are not promoting freedom and independence, are not following the path of civilization, but are displaying the traits of ignorance, of servitude, of savagery, and treading the way that leads back to the jungle.

In a republic, the first rule for guiding citizens is to obey the law. In a dictatorship, the law can be forced upon the subject. They have no say in creating it, no influence in how it's enforced, and it doesn't represent them. In a free government, citizens create their own laws and choose their own leaders, who do represent them. Those who want their rights respected under the Constitution and the law should set an example by following the Constitution and the law themselves. While some highly intelligent people might break the law sometimes, those who are less educated or misguided always break it. People who ignore society's rules aren't showing superior intelligence, promoting freedom and independence, or following the path of civilization; they're revealing ignorance, servitude, and savagery, and heading back to the jungle.

The essence of a republic is representative government. Our Congress represents the people and the States. In all legislative affairs it is the natural collaborator with the President. In spite of all the criticism which often falls to its lot, I do not hesitate to say that there is no more independent and effective legislative body in the world. It is, and should be, jealous of its prerogative. I welcome its cooperation, and expect to share with it not only the responsibility, but the credit, for our common effort to secure beneficial legislation.

The core of a republic is having a government that represents the people. Our Congress represents both the citizens and the states. In all legislative matters, it naturally works alongside the President. Despite all the criticism it often receives, I truly believe there isn’t a more independent and effective legislative body anywhere in the world. It is, and should be, protective of its rights. I appreciate its collaboration and look forward to not only sharing the responsibility but also the recognition for our collective efforts to achieve beneficial legislation.

These are some of the principles which America represents. We have not by any means put them fully into practice, but we have strongly signified our belief in them. The encouraging feature of our country is not that it has reached its destination, but that it has overwhelmingly expressed its determination to proceed in the right direction. It is true that we could, with profit, be less sectional and more national in our thought. It would be well if we could replace much that is only a false and ignorant prejudice with a true and enlightened pride of race. But the last election showed that appeals to class and nationality had little effect. We were all found loyal to a common citizenship. The fundamental precept of liberty is toleration. We can not permit any inquisition either within or without the law or apply any religious test to the holding of office. The mind of America must be forever free.

These are some of the principles that America stands for. We haven't fully put them into practice, but we've clearly shown our belief in them. The encouraging thing about our country is not that it has reached its goal, but that it has strongly expressed its determination to move in the right direction. It's true that we could benefit from being less focused on regional differences and more united as a nation. It would be good if we could replace much of the false and ignorant prejudice with a genuine and informed pride in our identity. However, the last election demonstrated that appeals to class and nationality had little impact. We all showed loyalty to a shared citizenship. The fundamental principle of liberty is tolerance. We cannot allow any sort of inquisition, either within or outside the law, nor can we impose any religious test for holding office. The mind of America must always be free.

It is in such contemplations, my fellow countrymen, which are not exhaustive but only representative, that I find ample warrant for satisfaction and encouragement. We should not let the much that is to do obscure the much which has been done. The past and present show faith and hope and courage fully justified. Here stands our country, an example of tranquillity at home, a patron of tranquillity abroad. Here stands its Government, aware of its might but obedient to its conscience. Here it will continue to stand, seeking peace and prosperity, solicitous for the welfare of the wage earner, promoting enterprise, developing waterways and natural resources, attentive to the intuitive counsel of womanhood, encouraging education, desiring the advancement of religion, supporting the cause of justice and honor among the nations. America seeks no earthly empire built on blood and force. No ambition, no temptation, lures her to thought of foreign dominions. The legions which she sends forth are armed, not with the sword, but with the cross. The higher state to which she seeks the allegiance of all mankind is not of human, but of divine origin. She cherishes no purpose save to merit the favor of Almighty God.

In these reflections, my fellow citizens, which are not all-encompassing but merely illustrative, I find plenty of reasons for satisfaction and encouragement. We shouldn't let all that's left to be done overshadow everything that has already been accomplished. The past and present demonstrate faith, hope, and courage that are well-deserved. Here stands our country, a model of peace at home and a supporter of peace abroad. Here stands its Government, aware of its power yet guided by its principles. Here it will continue to be, pursuing peace and prosperity, concerned for the well-being of workers, fostering business, developing waterways and natural resources, listening to the insights of women, promoting education, advocating for the advancement of religion, and supporting justice and honor among nations. America seeks no earthly empire built on violence and domination. No ambition, no temptation, draws her into thoughts of foreign control. The forces she sends out are not armed with weapons, but with compassion. The higher state she aspires for all people to embrace is not of human creation but of divine origin. She holds no goal other than to earn the favor of Almighty God.






HERBERT HOOVER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1929

[Transcriber's note: Popular opinion for the engineer, humanitarian, and Secretary of Commerce brought the President-elect to office with expectations of continued national growth and prosperity. Chief Justice William Howard Taft administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. On taking his first elective office, the new President addressed a large crowd in the drizzling rain. Dirigibles and aircraft flew over the Capitol to mark the occasion.]

[Transcriber's note: Public support for the engineer, humanitarian, and Secretary of Commerce helped the President-elect take office with hopes of ongoing national growth and prosperity. Chief Justice William Howard Taft swore him in on the East Portico of the Capitol. Upon assuming his first elected position, the new President spoke to a large crowd in the light rain. Airships and planes flew over the Capitol to celebrate the event.]


My Countrymen:

My Fellow Citizens:

This occasion is not alone the administration of the most sacred oath which can be assumed by an American citizen. It is a dedication and consecration under God to the highest office in service of our people. I assume this trust in the humility of knowledge that only through the guidance of Almighty Providence can I hope to discharge its ever-increasing burdens.

This moment isn't just about taking the most sacred oath that an American citizen can make. It's a commitment and dedication to serve our people at the highest level under God. I take on this responsibility with the humble understanding that only through the guidance of Almighty Providence can I hope to manage its growing challenges.

It is in keeping with tradition throughout our history that I should express simply and directly the opinions which I hold concerning some of the matters of present importance.

It’s in line with tradition throughout our history that I should express plainly and directly my views on some important current issues.

OUR PROGRESS

OUR PROGRESS

If we survey the situation of our Nation both at home and abroad, we find many satisfactions; we find some causes for concern. We have emerged from the losses of the Great War and the reconstruction following it with increased virility and strength. From this strength we have contributed to the recovery and progress of the world. What America has done has given renewed hope and courage to all who have faith in government by the people. In the large view, we have reached a higher degree of comfort and security than ever existed before in the history of the world. Through liberation from widespread poverty we have reached a higher degree of individual freedom than ever before. The devotion to and concern for our institutions are deep and sincere. We are steadily building a new race—a new civilization great in its own attainments. The influence and high purposes of our Nation are respected among the peoples of the world. We aspire to distinction in the world, but to a distinction based upon confidence in our sense of justice as well as our accomplishments within our own borders and in our own lives. For wise guidance in this great period of recovery the Nation is deeply indebted to Calvin Coolidge.

If we look at our Nation’s situation both at home and abroad, we see many things to feel good about, but also some reasons to be worried. We’ve come out of the losses of the Great War and the subsequent rebuilding with more strength and vitality. From this strength, we’ve helped the world recover and progress. What America has done has renewed hope and courage for everyone who believes in government by the people. Overall, we’ve achieved a level of comfort and security that has never existed before in history. By eliminating widespread poverty, we’ve attained a higher degree of individual freedom than ever before. Our commitment to and concern for our institutions are genuine and profound. We are steadily creating a new generation—a new civilization that excels in its own right. The influence and good intentions of our Nation are respected around the globe. We aim for recognition in the world, but it’s a recognition based on confidence in our sense of justice as well as what we’ve accomplished both at home and in our lives. We owe a great deal of gratitude to Calvin Coolidge for the wise guidance during this significant recovery period.

But all this majestic advance should not obscure the constant dangers from which self-government must be safeguarded. The strong man must at all times be alert to the attack of insidious disease.

But all this impressive progress shouldn’t blind us to the ongoing dangers that self-government must be protected against. The strong person must always be vigilant against the threat of hidden problems.

THE FAILURE OF OUR SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

THE FAILURE OF OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

The most malign of all these dangers today is disregard and disobedience of law. Crime is increasing. Confidence in rigid and speedy justice is decreasing. I am not prepared to believe that this indicates any decay in the moral fiber of the American people. I am not prepared to believe that it indicates an impotence of the Federal Government to enforce its laws.

The biggest threat we face today is the disregard and disobedience of the law. Crime is on the rise. Trust in strict and prompt justice is declining. I refuse to believe that this shows any decline in the moral character of the American people. I also refuse to believe that it reflects the Federal Government's inability to enforce its laws.

It is only in part due to the additional burdens imposed upon our judicial system by the eighteenth amendment. The problem is much wider than that. Many influences had increasingly complicated and weakened our law enforcement organization long before the adoption of the eighteenth amendment.

It’s only partly because of the extra pressures put on our judicial system by the eighteenth amendment. The issue is much broader than that. Many factors had already made our law enforcement agencies more complicated and weakened them long before the eighteenth amendment was enacted.

To reestablish the vigor and effectiveness of law enforcement we must critically consider the entire Federal machinery of justice, the redistribution of its functions, the simplification of its procedure, the provision of additional special tribunals, the better selection of juries, and the more effective organization of our agencies of investigation and prosecution that justice may be sure and that it may be swift. While the authority of the Federal Government extends to but part of our vast system of national, State, and local justice, yet the standards which the Federal Government establishes have the most profound influence upon the whole structure.

To revive the strength and efficiency of law enforcement, we need to carefully examine the entire federal justice system, rethink its roles, simplify its processes, create more specialized courts, improve jury selection, and better organize our investigation and prosecution agencies so that justice is both certain and quick. Although the federal government's authority only covers part of our extensive national, state, and local justice systems, the standards set by the federal government significantly impact the entire structure.

We are fortunate in the ability and integrity of our Federal judges and attorneys. But the system which these officers are called upon to administer is in many respects ill adapted to present-day conditions. Its intricate and involved rules of procedure have become the refuge of both big and little criminals. There is a belief abroad that by invoking technicalities, subterfuge, and delay, the ends of justice may be thwarted by those who can pay the cost.

We are lucky to have capable and honest Federal judges and attorneys. However, the system they operate isn't well suited for today's realities. Its complex and convoluted rules of procedure have turned into a safe haven for both major and minor offenders. There’s a common belief that by using technicalities, tricks, and delays, justice can be sidestepped by those who can afford it.

Reform, reorganization and strengthening of our whole judicial and enforcement system, both in civil and criminal sides, have been advocated for years by statesmen, judges, and bar associations. First steps toward that end should not longer be delayed. Rigid and expeditious justice is the first safeguard of freedom, the basis of all ordered liberty, the vital force of progress. It must not come to be in our Republic that it can be defeated by the indifference of the citizen, by exploitation of the delays and entanglements of the law, or by combinations of criminals. Justice must not fail because the agencies of enforcement are either delinquent or inefficiently organized. To consider these evils, to find their remedy, is the most sore necessity of our times.

Reform, reorganization, and strengthening of our entire judicial and enforcement system, both in civil and criminal matters, have been called for for years by politicians, judges, and bar associations. We should not delay any longer in taking the first steps towards that goal. Fast and fair justice is the first safeguard of freedom, the foundation of all ordered liberty, and the driving force of progress. We cannot allow it to be undermined in our Republic by citizen apathy, manipulation of legal delays and complications, or by criminal organizations. Justice must not fail because enforcement agencies are either negligent or poorly organized. Addressing these issues and finding solutions is the most pressing need of our time.

ENFORCEMENT OF THE EIGHTEENTH AMENDMENT

Eighteenth Amendment Enforcement

Of the undoubted abuses which have grown up under the eighteenth amendment, part are due to the causes I have just mentioned; but part are due to the failure of some States to accept their share of responsibility for concurrent enforcement and to the failure of many State and local officials to accept the obligation under their oath of office zealously to enforce the laws. With the failures from these many causes has come a dangerous expansion in the criminal elements who have found enlarged opportunities in dealing in illegal liquor.

Of the undeniable problems that have arisen under the eighteenth amendment, some are due to the reasons I just mentioned; but some are due to the failure of certain states to take their part of the responsibility for joint enforcement and to the failure of many state and local officials to uphold their duty under their oath of office to actively enforce the laws. With these many failures has come a worrying increase in the criminal elements who have found greater opportunities in the illegal liquor trade.

But a large responsibility rests directly upon our citizens. There would be little traffic in illegal liquor if only criminals patronized it. We must awake to the fact that this patronage from large numbers of law-abiding citizens is supplying the rewards and stimulating crime.

But a big responsibility lies directly on our citizens. There wouldn't be much demand for illegal alcohol if only criminals were buying it. We need to realize that this support from a lot of law-abiding citizens is providing the profits and encouraging crime.

I have been selected by you to execute and enforce the laws of the country. I propose to do so to the extent of my own abilities, but the measure of success that the Government shall attain will depend upon the moral support which you, as citizens, extend. The duty of citizens to support the laws of the land is coequal with the duty of their Government to enforce the laws which exist. No greater national service can be given by men and women of good will—who, I know, are not unmindful of the responsibilities of citizenship—than that they should, by their example, assist in stamping out crime and outlawry by refusing participation in and condemning all transactions with illegal liquor. Our whole system of self-government will crumble either if officials elect what laws they will enforce or citizens elect what laws they will support. The worst evil of disregard for some law is that it destroys respect for all law. For our citizens to patronize the violation of a particular law on the ground that they are opposed to it is destructive of the very basis of all that protection of life, of homes and property which they rightly claim under other laws. If citizens do not like a law, their duty as honest men and women is to discourage its violation; their right is openly to work for its repeal.

I have been chosen by you to uphold and enforce the country's laws. I plan to do this to the best of my abilities, but the government's success will rely on your moral support as citizens. The obligation of citizens to back the laws of the land is just as important as the government's duty to enforce those laws. There’s no greater service to the nation from people of good will—who I know understand the responsibilities of citizenship—than to help eliminate crime and lawlessness by refusing to engage in and condemning any dealings with illegal alcohol. Our entire system of self-government will collapse if officials pick and choose which laws to enforce, or if citizens decide which laws to support. The biggest problem with ignoring certain laws is that it undermines respect for all laws. If citizens choose to support the violation of a specific law because they disagree with it, they are damaging the very foundation of the protection of life, homes, and property that they rightfully expect under other laws. If citizens disagree with a law, their duty as honest people is to discourage its violation; their right is to actively work for its repeal.

To those of criminal mind there can be no appeal but vigorous enforcement of the law. Fortunately they are but a small percentage of our people. Their activities must be stopped.

To people with a criminal mindset, the only solution is strict enforcement of the law. Luckily, they make up only a small percentage of our population. Their actions need to be halted.

A NATIONAL INVESTIGATION

A national inquiry

I propose to appoint a national commission for a searching investigation of the whole structure of our Federal system of jurisprudence, to include the method of enforcement of the eighteenth amendment and the causes of abuse under it. Its purpose will be to make such recommendations for reorganization of the administration of Federal laws and court procedure as may be found desirable. In the meantime it is essential that a large part of the enforcement activities be transferred from the Treasury Department to the Department of Justice as a beginning of more effective organization.

I suggest we set up a national commission to thoroughly investigate the entire structure of our Federal legal system, including how the eighteenth amendment is enforced and the reasons for its misuse. The goal will be to provide recommendations for reorganizing the administration of Federal laws and court procedures as necessary. In the meantime, it's crucial to move a significant portion of enforcement activities from the Treasury Department to the Department of Justice to start creating a more effective organization.

THE RELATION OF GOVERNMENT TO BUSINESS

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS

The election has again confirmed the determination of the American people that regulation of private enterprise and not Government ownership or operation is the course rightly to be pursued in our relation to business. In recent years we have established a differentiation in the whole method of business regulation between the industries which produce and distribute commodities on the one hand and public utilities on the other. In the former, our laws insist upon effective competition; in the latter, because we substantially confer a monopoly by limiting competition, we must regulate their services and rates. The rigid enforcement of the laws applicable to both groups is the very base of equal opportunity and freedom from domination for all our people, and it is just as essential for the stability and prosperity of business itself as for the protection of the public at large. Such regulation should be extended by the Federal Government within the limitations of the Constitution and only when the individual States are without power to protect their citizens through their own authority. On the other hand, we should be fearless when the authority rests only in the Federal Government.

The election has once again shown the determination of the American people that regulation of private enterprise, rather than government ownership or operation, is the right approach for our business relationships. Recently, we have made a distinction in the way we regulate businesses between those that produce and distribute goods and public utilities. For the former, our laws demand effective competition; for the latter, since we effectively grant a monopoly by restricting competition, we need to regulate their services and prices. Strict enforcement of the laws that apply to both groups is the foundation for equal opportunity and freedom from control for everyone, and it is just as crucial for the stability and success of businesses as it is for the protection of the public. Such regulation should be extended by the federal government within the constitutional limits and only when individual states lack the power to protect their citizens through their own authority. Conversely, we should be bold when the authority lies solely with the federal government.

COOPERATION BY THE GOVERNMENT

Government Collaboration

The larger purpose of our economic thought should be to establish more firmly stability and security of business and employment and thereby remove poverty still further from our borders. Our people have in recent years developed a new-found capacity for cooperation among themselves to effect high purposes in public welfare. It is an advance toward the highest conception of self-government. Self-government does not and should not imply the use of political agencies alone. Progress is born of cooperation in the community—not from governmental restraints. The Government should assist and encourage these movements of collective self-help by itself cooperating with them. Business has by cooperation made great progress in the advancement of service, in stability, in regularity of employment and in the correction of its own abuses. Such progress, however, can continue only so long as business manifests its respect for law.

The main goal of our economic thinking should be to strengthen the stability and security of businesses and jobs, and to further reduce poverty in our communities. Recently, our people have developed a new ability to work together for important public welfare goals. This is a step toward the best understanding of self-government. Self-government doesn’t just involve political systems; real progress comes from community cooperation, not governmental restrictions. The government should support and promote these collective self-help efforts by working with them. Through cooperation, businesses have made significant strides in improving services, stability, consistent employment, and addressing their own issues. However, this progress can only continue if businesses respect the law.

There is an equally important field of cooperation by the Federal Government with the multitude of agencies, State, municipal and private, in the systematic development of those processes which directly affect public health, recreation, education, and the home. We have need further to perfect the means by which Government can be adapted to human service.

There is a crucial area of collaboration between the Federal Government and many agencies—state, local, and private—in the organized development of processes that directly impact public health, recreation, education, and the home. We also need to improve the ways in which the Government can be tailored to serve people better.

EDUCATION

EDUCATION

Although education is primarily a responsibility of the States and local communities, and rightly so, yet the Nation as a whole is vitally concerned in its development everywhere to the highest standards and to complete universality. Self-government can succeed only through an instructed electorate. Our objective is not simply to overcome illiteracy. The Nation has marched far beyond that. The more complex the problems of the Nation become, the greater is the need for more and more advanced instruction. Moreover, as our numbers increase and as our life expands with science and invention, we must discover more and more leaders for every walk of life. We can not hope to succeed in directing this increasingly complex civilization unless we can draw all the talent of leadership from the whole people. One civilization after another has been wrecked upon the attempt to secure sufficient leadership from a single group or class. If we would prevent the growth of class distinctions and would constantly refresh our leadership with the ideals of our people, we must draw constantly from the general mass. The full opportunity for every boy and girl to rise through the selective processes of education can alone secure to us this leadership.

Although education is mainly the job of the States and local communities, and rightly so, the whole Nation is deeply concerned with ensuring it reaches the highest standards and is universally accessible. Self-government can only flourish with an informed electorate. Our goal isn't just to eliminate illiteracy; the Nation has moved far beyond that. As the problems we face become more complex, the need for more advanced education grows. Additionally, as our population increases and as we progress with science and technology, we must identify more leaders for every field. We can’t expect to successfully manage this increasingly complex society unless we tap into the full range of leadership talent from everyone. History has shown that civilizations have failed when they tried to source sufficient leadership from only one group or class. If we want to avoid class divisions and keep our leadership inspired by the values of our people, we must continually draw from the general population. Providing every boy and girl with full opportunities to advance through education is the only way to ensure we have strong leadership.

PUBLIC HEALTH

Public Health

In public health the discoveries of science have opened a new era. Many sections of our country and many groups of our citizens suffer from diseases the eradication of which are mere matters of administration and moderate expenditure. Public health service should be as fully organized and as universally incorporated into our governmental system as is public education. The returns are a thousand fold in economic benefits, and infinitely more in reduction of suffering and promotion of human happiness.

In public health, scientific discoveries have ushered in a new era. Many areas of our country and various groups of our citizens are affected by diseases that could be eliminated with proper management and reasonable funding. Public health services should be as thoroughly organized and universally integrated into our government system as public education. The economic benefits are immense, and the reduction of suffering and enhancement of human happiness are even greater.

WORLD PEACE

Global peace

The United States fully accepts the profound truth that our own progress, prosperity, and peace are interlocked with the progress, prosperity, and peace of all humanity. The whole world is at peace. The dangers to a continuation of this peace to-day are largely the fear and suspicion which still haunt the world. No suspicion or fear can be rightly directed toward our country.

The United States completely acknowledges the deep truth that our own growth, wealth, and peace are connected to the growth, wealth, and peace of all people. The entire world is at peace. The main threats to maintaining this peace today are largely the fear and suspicion that still linger globally. There should be no suspicion or fear directed toward our country.

Those who have a true understanding of America know that we have no desire for territorial expansion, for economic or other domination of other peoples. Such purposes are repugnant to our ideals of human freedom. Our form of government is ill adapted to the responsibilities which inevitably follow permanent limitation of the independence of other peoples. Superficial observers seem to find no destiny for our abounding increase in population, in wealth and power except that of imperialism. They fail to see that the American people are engrossed in the building for themselves of a new economic system, a new social system, a new political system all of which are characterized by aspirations of freedom of opportunity and thereby are the negation of imperialism. They fail to realize that because of our abounding prosperity our youth are pressing more and more into our institutions of learning; that our people are seeking a larger vision through art, literature, science, and travel; that they are moving toward stronger moral and spiritual life—that from these things our sympathies are broadening beyond the bounds of our Nation and race toward their true expression in a real brotherhood of man. They fail to see that the idealism of America will lead it to no narrow or selfish channel, but inspire it to do its full share as a nation toward the advancement of civilization. It will do that not by mere declaration but by taking a practical part in supporting all useful international undertakings. We not only desire peace with the world, but to see peace maintained throughout the world. We wish to advance the reign of justice and reason toward the extinction of force.

Those who truly understand America know that we have no interest in expanding our territory or dominating other nations economically or otherwise. Such aims are against our ideals of human freedom. Our form of government isn't suited to the responsibilities that come with permanently limiting the independence of others. Superficial observers think our growing population, wealth, and power can only lead to imperialism. They don't see that the American people are focused on building a new economic, social, and political system, all characterized by the pursuit of freedom and opportunity, which completely opposes imperialism. They fail to realize that due to our great prosperity, our youth are increasingly enrolling in educational institutions; our people are seeking a broader perspective through art, literature, science, and travel; they are moving toward a stronger moral and spiritual life—these factors are expanding our sympathy beyond our national and racial boundaries toward a genuine brotherhood of humanity. They don't recognize that America's idealism will not lead us down a narrow or selfish path, but will inspire us to contribute significantly as a nation to the advancement of civilization. We will do this not just by proclaiming it, but by actively participating in all meaningful international efforts. We not only want peace with the world, but we also want to see peace maintained across the globe. We aim to promote justice and reason while working to eliminate the use of force.

The recent treaty for the renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy sets an advanced standard in our conception of the relations of nations. Its acceptance should pave the way to greater limitation of armament, the offer of which we sincerely extend to the world. But its full realization also implies a greater and greater perfection in the instrumentalities for pacific settlement of controversies between nations. In the creation and use of these instrumentalities we should support every sound method of conciliation, arbitration, and judicial settlement. American statesmen were among the first to propose and they have constantly urged upon the world, the establishment of a tribunal for the settlement of controversies of a justiciable character. The Permanent Court of International Justice in its major purpose is thus peculiarly identified with American ideals and with American statesmanship. No more potent instrumentality for this purpose has ever been conceived and no other is practicable of establishment. The reservations placed upon our adherence should not be misinterpreted. The United States seeks by these reservations no special privilege or advantage but only to clarify our relation to advisory opinions and other matters which are subsidiary to the major purpose of the court. The way should, and I believe will, be found by which we may take our proper place in a movement so fundamental to the progress of peace.

The recent treaty to renounce war as a tool of national policy establishes a progressive standard for how we view international relations. Accepting it should lead to a greater reduction in armament, which we genuinely offer to the world. However, fully realizing this goal also requires improving the methods for peacefully resolving disputes between nations. We should promote every effective approach to conciliation, arbitration, and judicial resolution in creating and using these methods. American leaders were among the first to advocate for establishing a tribunal to settle legal disputes and have consistently encouraged this worldwide. The Permanent Court of International Justice is closely aligned with American ideals and statesmanship in its main purpose. There has never been a more powerful tool for this aim, and no other is feasible to create. The reservations we placed on our agreement should not be misunderstood. The United States does not seek any special privilege or advantage through these reservations; we only aim to clarify our relationship to advisory opinions and other subsidiary matters related to the court's main purpose. I believe, and I hope, that a way will be found for us to take our rightful place in a movement so essential for advancing peace.

Our people have determined that we should make no political engagements such as membership in the League of Nations, which may commit us in advance as a nation to become involved in the settlements of controversies between other countries. They adhere to the belief that the independence of America from such obligations increases its ability and availability for service in all fields of human progress.

Our people have decided that we should avoid any political commitments, like joining the League of Nations, that could tie us down as a nation when it comes to resolving disputes between other countries. They believe that America’s independence from these obligations strengthens its capacity and willingness to contribute to all areas of human progress.

I have lately returned from a journey among our sister Republics of the Western Hemisphere. I have received unbounded hospitality and courtesy as their expression of friendliness to our country. We are held by particular bonds of sympathy and common interest with them. They are each of them building a racial character and a culture which is an impressive contribution to human progress. We wish only for the maintenance of their independence, the growth of their stability, and their prosperity. While we have had wars in the Western Hemisphere, yet on the whole the record is in encouraging contrast with that of other parts of the world. Fortunately the New World is largely free from the inheritances of fear and distrust which have so troubled the Old World. We should keep it so.

I recently returned from a trip to our sister Republics in the Western Hemisphere. I was welcomed with incredible hospitality and kindness, which showed their friendship towards our country. We share strong ties of sympathy and common interests with them. Each of these nations is developing a unique identity and culture that significantly contributes to human progress. We only want to see them maintain their independence, grow more stable, and thrive. Although we've experienced wars in the Western Hemisphere, overall, the situation is much more encouraging compared to other parts of the world. Thankfully, the New World is mostly free from the legacy of fear and distrust that has plagued the Old World. We should work to keep it that way.

It is impossible, my countrymen, to speak of peace without profound emotion. In thousands of homes in America, in millions of homes around the world, there are vacant chairs. It would be a shameful confession of our unworthiness if it should develop that we have abandoned the hope for which all these men died. Surely civilization is old enough, surely mankind is mature enough so that we ought in our own lifetime to find a way to permanent peace. Abroad, to west and east, are nations whose sons mingled their blood with the blood of our sons on the battlefields. Most of these nations have contributed to our race, to our culture, our knowledge, and our progress. From one of them we derive our very language and from many of them much of the genius of our institutions. Their desire for peace is as deep and sincere as our own.

It’s impossible, my fellow citizens, to talk about peace without deep emotion. In thousands of homes in America and millions around the world, there are empty chairs. It would be a shameful acknowledgment of our unworthiness if we were to abandon the hope for which all these men died. Surely, civilization is old enough, and humanity is mature enough that we should be able to find a path to lasting peace in our lifetime. Abroad, to the west and east, are nations whose sons shed their blood alongside our sons on the battlefields. Most of these nations have enriched our race, our culture, our knowledge, and our progress. From one of them, we even get our very language, and from many of them comes a lot of the brilliance of our institutions. Their desire for peace is as deep and genuine as our own.

Peace can be contributed to by respect for our ability in defense. Peace can be promoted by the limitation of arms and by the creation of the instrumentalities for peaceful settlement of controversies. But it will become a reality only through self-restraint and active effort in friendliness and helpfulness. I covet for this administration a record of having further contributed to advance the cause of peace.

Peace can be supported by respecting our capacity for defense. Peace can be encouraged by limiting arms and establishing means for peacefully resolving disputes. However, it will only become a reality through self-control and proactive efforts in kindness and support. I aspire for this administration to have a record of advancing the cause of peace.

PARTY RESPONSIBILITIES

Party duties

In our form of democracy the expression of the popular will can be effected only through the instrumentality of political parties. We maintain party government not to promote intolerant partisanship but because opportunity must be given for expression of the popular will, and organization provided for the execution of its mandates and for accountability of government to the people. It follows that the government both in the executive and the legislative branches must carry out in good faith the platforms upon which the party was entrusted with power. But the government is that of the whole people; the party is the instrument through which policies are determined and men chosen to bring them into being. The animosities of elections should have no place in our Government, for government must concern itself alone with the common weal.

In our type of democracy, the expression of the people's will can only happen through political parties. We support party government not to encourage strict partisanship but because there needs to be a way for people to express their wishes, and a structure to carry out those wishes and hold the government accountable to the public. This means that both the executive and legislative branches must honestly implement the platforms on which the party was given power. However, the government represents everyone; the party is just the tool through which policies are created and people are selected to implement them. The conflicts that come with elections shouldn’t have a place in our government because it should focus solely on the common good.

SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONGRESS

SPECIAL SESSION OF CONGRESS

Action upon some of the proposals upon which the Republican Party was returned to power, particularly further agricultural relief and limited changes in the tariff, cannot in justice to our farmers, our labor, and our manufacturers be postponed. I shall therefore request a special session of Congress for the consideration of these two questions. I shall deal with each of them upon the assembly of the Congress.

Action on some of the proposals that helped the Republican Party come back to power, especially additional support for farmers and some adjustments to tariffs, cannot be delayed any longer if we are to do right by our farmers, workers, and manufacturers. I will therefore call for a special session of Congress to discuss these two issues. I will address each of them when Congress meets.

OTHER MANDATES FROM THE ELECTION

OTHER MANDATES FROM THE VOTE

It appears to me that the more important further mandates from the recent election were the maintenance of the integrity of the Constitution; the vigorous enforcement of the laws; the continuance of economy in public expenditure; the continued regulation of business to prevent domination in the community; the denial of ownership or operation of business by the Government in competition with its citizens; the avoidance of policies which would involve us in the controversies of foreign nations; the more effective reorganization of the departments of the Federal Government; the expansion of public works; and the promotion of welfare activities affecting education and the home.

It seems to me that the most important directives from the recent election were to uphold the integrity of the Constitution; to enforce the laws vigorously; to keep public spending in check; to regulate businesses to prevent monopolies in the community; to ensure the Government doesn't own or operate businesses that compete with its citizens; to steer clear of policies that would drag us into foreign disputes; to reorganize the Federal Government’s departments more effectively; to expand public works; and to support welfare initiatives related to education and family.

These were the more tangible determinations of the election, but beyond them was the confidence and belief of the people that we would not neglect the support of the embedded ideals and aspirations of America. These ideals and aspirations are the touchstones upon which the day-to-day administration and legislative acts of government must be tested. More than this, the Government must, so far as lies within its proper powers, give leadership to the realization of these ideals and to the fruition of these aspirations. No one can adequately reduce these things of the spirit to phrases or to a catalogue of definitions. We do know what the attainments of these ideals should be: The preservation of self-government and its full foundations in local government; the perfection of justice whether in economic or in social fields; the maintenance of ordered liberty; the denial of domination by any group or class; the building up and preservation of equality of opportunity; the stimulation of initiative and individuality; absolute integrity in public affairs; the choice of officials for fitness to office; the direction of economic progress toward prosperity for the further lessening of poverty; the freedom of public opinion; the sustaining of education and of the advancement of knowledge; the growth of religious spirit and the tolerance of all faiths; the strengthening of the home; the advancement of peace.

These were the clearer outcomes of the election, but beyond that was the confidence and belief of the people that we would not overlook the support of America's core ideals and aspirations. These ideals and aspirations are the standards by which the daily actions and legislation of government must be measured. More importantly, the Government must, as much as it can within its proper powers, lead the way in realizing these ideals and fulfilling these aspirations. No one can fully capture these spiritual concepts in words or a list of definitions. We do understand what these ideals should achieve: the preservation of self-government and its strong foundation in local government; the perfection of justice in both economic and social areas; the maintenance of ordered liberty; the prevention of domination by any group or class; the promotion and protection of equal opportunity; the encouragement of initiative and individuality; complete integrity in public affairs; the selection of officials based on their suitability for the position; the guidance of economic progress towards prosperity to further reduce poverty; the freedom of public opinion; the support of education and the advancement of knowledge; the growth of religious spirit and tolerance for all beliefs; the strengthening of the family; the promotion of peace.

There is no short road to the realization of these aspirations. Ours is a progressive people, but with a determination that progress must be based upon the foundation of experience. Ill-considered remedies for our faults bring only penalties after them. But if we hold the faith of the men in our mighty past who created these ideals, we shall leave them heightened and strengthened for our children.

There’s no quick path to achieving these goals. We are a forward-thinking people, but we're committed to making sure progress is built on real experience. Rash solutions to our problems only lead to more issues. However, if we hold onto the spirit of the great individuals from our history who established these ideals, we will pass them on even better and stronger for our children.

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

This is not the time and place for extended discussion. The questions before our country are problems of progress to higher standards; they are not the problems of degeneration. They demand thought and they serve to quicken the conscience and enlist our sense of responsibility for their settlement. And that responsibility rests upon you, my countrymen, as much as upon those of us who have been selected for office.

This isn’t the right time or place for a long discussion. The issues facing our country are about advancing to better standards; they’re not about decline. They require careful consideration and they inspire us to be more conscious and take responsibility for solving them. That responsibility falls on you, my fellow citizens, just as much as it falls on those of us who have been chosen for office.

Ours is a land rich in resources; stimulating in its glorious beauty; filled with millions of happy homes; blessed with comfort and opportunity. In no nation are the institutions of progress more advanced. In no nation are the fruits of accomplishment more secure. In no nation is the government more worthy of respect. No country is more loved by its people. I have an abiding faith in their capacity, integrity and high purpose. I have no fears for the future of our country. It is bright with hope.

Our country is full of resources, stunning in its beauty, home to millions of happy families, and filled with comfort and opportunities. No other nation has more advanced institutions for progress. No other nation has more secure achievements. No government deserves more respect. No country is more cherished by its people. I have deep faith in their ability, integrity, and noble intentions. I have no worries about our country's future. It shines bright with hope.

In the presence of my countrymen, mindful of the solemnity of this occasion, knowing what the task means and the responsibility which it involves, I beg your tolerance, your aid, and your cooperation. I ask the help of Almighty God in this service to my country to which you have called me.

In front of my fellow citizens, aware of the seriousness of this moment, understanding the significance of this duty and the responsibility it carries, I ask for your patience, your support, and your collaboration. I seek the assistance of Almighty God in this service to my country that you have entrusted to me.






FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 1933

[Transcriber's note: The former Governor of New York rode to the Capitol with President Hoover. Pressures of the economy faced the President-elect as he took his oath of office from Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes on the East Portico of the Capitol. He addressed the nation by radio and announced his plans for a New Deal. Throughout that day the President met with his Cabinet designees at the White House.]

[Transcriber's note: The former Governor of New York rode to the Capitol with President Hoover. The pressures of the economy confronted the President-elect as he took his oath of office from Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes on the East Portico of the Capitol. He spoke to the nation via radio and shared his plans for a New Deal. Throughout that day, the President met with his Cabinet appointees at the White House.]


I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our Nation impels. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.

I know that my fellow Americans expect me to speak with honesty and decisiveness as I take on the Presidency, given the current state of our Nation. This is clearly the time to tell the truth—completely and openly. We shouldn't shy away from honestly confronting the realities we face today. This great Nation will endure as it has before, will recover and will succeed. So, let me start by firmly saying that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—an irrational, unreasoning, and unjustified terror that holds us back from making progress. In every difficult moment in our national history, a straightforward and strong leadership has received the understanding and support of the people, which is crucial for success. I am confident that you will once again support strong leadership during these challenging times.

In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties. They concern, thank God, only material things. Values have shrunken to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income; the means of exchange are frozen in the currents of trade; the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone.

In this shared mindset, we confront our common challenges. Thankfully, they are only about material issues. The value of everything has dropped to unbelievable levels; taxes have gone up; our ability to pay has decreased; all types of government are facing significant income cuts; the flow of trade has stalled; the remnants of industrial activity surround us; farmers can't find buyers for their products; and the savings accumulated over many years for thousands of families have disappeared.

More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.

More importantly, a large number of unemployed citizens are dealing with the harsh reality of survival, and just as many work hard for little reward. Only a naive optimist can ignore the harsh truths of the present.

Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance. We are stricken by no plague of locusts. Compared with the perils which our forefathers conquered because they believed and were not afraid, we have still much to be thankful for. Nature still offers her bounty and human efforts have multiplied it. Plenty is at our doorstep, but a generous use of it languishes in the very sight of the supply. Primarily this is because the rulers of the exchange of mankind's goods have failed, through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence, have admitted their failure, and abdicated. Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men.

Yet our distress doesn't come from a lack of resources. We’re not facing a plague of locusts. Compared to the challenges our ancestors overcame because they had faith and were fearless, we still have a lot to be grateful for. Nature continues to provide abundantly, and human effort has increased that abundance. There's plenty right at our doorstep, but we're not making good use of it even though the supply is clear. This is mostly because those in charge of the exchange of goods have failed, due to their own stubbornness and incompetence, have admitted their failure, and stepped back. The actions of greedy money changers are condemned in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of people.

True they have tried, but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish.

True, they have tried, but their efforts have been stuck in an outdated tradition. When faced with a credit crisis, they only suggested lending more money. Without the appeal of profit to encourage people to follow their misguided leadership, they've turned to emotional pleas, begging for restored confidence. They only understand the rules of a generation of self-serving individuals. They lack vision, and without vision, the people suffer.

The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.

The money changers have left their high positions in the temple of our society. We can now return that temple to its original values. The degree of this restoration depends on how much we embrace social values that are more important than just making money.

Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort. The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of evanescent profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow men.

Happiness doesn't come from just having money; it comes from the joy of achievement and the excitement of creative effort. We shouldn’t overlook the joy and moral uplift that work brings us in our relentless pursuit of fleeting profits. These challenging times will be worth what we endure if they teach us that our true purpose is not just to receive help but to help ourselves and others.

Recognition of the falsity of material wealth as the standard of success goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit; and there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing. Small wonder that confidence languishes, for it thrives only on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection, on unselfish performance; without them it cannot live.

Recognizing that material wealth isn't the true measure of success goes hand in hand with letting go of the mistaken belief that public office and high political positions are only valuable for status and personal gain. We need to stop the behavior in banking and business that often turns a sacred trust into something that looks like heartless and selfish wrongdoing. It's no surprise that confidence suffers, because it only thrives on honesty, honor, the sacredness of commitments, reliable protection, and selfless actions; without those qualities, it can't survive.

Restoration calls, however, not for changes in ethics alone. This Nation asks for action, and action now.

Restoration requires more than just changes in ethics. This Nation demands action, and it demands it now.

Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously. It can be accomplished in part by direct recruiting by the Government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war, but at the same time, through this employment, accomplishing greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources.

Our main priority is to get people back to work. This isn't an impossible challenge if we approach it thoughtfully and bravely. We can partly achieve this by having the government directly hire people, treating the task like a wartime emergency. At the same time, this employment can help carry out important projects to boost and reorganize how we use our natural resources.

Hand in hand with this we must frankly recognize the overbalance of population in our industrial centers and, by engaging on a national scale in a redistribution, endeavor to provide a better use of the land for those best fitted for the land. The task can be helped by definite efforts to raise the values of agricultural products and with this the power to purchase the output of our cities. It can be helped by preventing realistically the tragedy of the growing loss through foreclosure of our small homes and our farms. It can be helped by insistence that the Federal, State, and local governments act forthwith on the demand that their cost be drastically reduced. It can be helped by the unifying of relief activities which today are often scattered, uneconomical, and unequal. It can be helped by national planning for and supervision of all forms of transportation and of communications and other utilities which have a definitely public character. There are many ways in which it can be helped, but it can never be helped merely by talking about it. We must act and act quickly.

We need to openly acknowledge the excess population in our industrial centers and work on a national level to redistribute resources to make better use of the land for those who are most suited to it. We can support this by making efforts to increase the value of agricultural products, which will boost the ability to buy goods from our cities. We can prevent the ongoing tragedy of losing small homes and farms due to foreclosure. We can push for the Federal, State, and local governments to take immediate action to drastically cut their costs. We can unify relief initiatives that are often disorganized, inefficient, and inconsistent. We can plan and oversee all forms of transportation, communication, and public utilities. There are many ways to make improvements, but we can’t just talk about it. We need to take action, and we need to do it quickly.

Finally, in our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order; there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments; there must be an end to speculation with other people's money, and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency.

Finally, as we work towards getting back to business, we need two key protections against falling back into the problems of the old system; there must be strict oversight of all banking, credit, and investments; we need to put a stop to speculating with other people's money, and there must be a plan for a stable but strong currency.

There are the lines of attack. I shall presently urge upon a new Congress in special session detailed measures for their fulfillment, and I shall seek the immediate assistance of the several States.

Here are the action plans. I will soon propose specific measures to a new Congress in a special session for their implementation, and I will seek immediate support from the various States.

Through this program of action we address ourselves to putting our own national house in order and making income balance outgo. Our international trade relations, though vastly important, are in point of time and necessity secondary to the establishment of a sound national economy. I favor as a practical policy the putting of first things first. I shall spare no effort to restore world trade by international economic readjustment, but the emergency at home cannot wait on that accomplishment.

Through this action plan, we focus on getting our own national situation under control and making sure our income matches our expenses. While our international trade relations are very important, they are, in terms of timing and necessity, secondary to creating a solid national economy. I believe that we should prioritize what truly matters. I will do everything I can to restore global trade through international economic adjustments, but we can’t delay addressing the urgent issues at home.

The basic thought that guides these specific means of national recovery is not narrowly nationalistic. It is the insistence, as a first consideration, upon the interdependence of the various elements in all parts of the United States—a recognition of the old and permanently important manifestation of the American spirit of the pioneer. It is the way to recovery. It is the immediate way. It is the strongest assurance that the recovery will endure.

The core idea behind these specific methods for national recovery isn't just about narrow nationalism. It's about recognizing, first and foremost, how all the different parts of the United States are interconnected—a reflection of the lasting and important spirit of American pioneers. This is the path to recovery. It's the direct route. It's the strongest guarantee that the recovery will be lasting.

In the field of world policy I would dedicate this Nation to the policy of the good neighbor—the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others—the neighbor who respects his obligations and respects the sanctity of his agreements in and with a world of neighbors.

In the realm of global affairs, I would commit this Nation to the principle of being a good neighbor—the kind of neighbor who confidently respects himself and, because he does, honors the rights of others—the neighbor who fulfills his responsibilities and values the sanctity of his agreements with a community of neighbors.

If I read the temper of our people correctly, we now realize as we have never realized before our interdependence on each other; that we can not merely take but we must give as well; that if we are to go forward, we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective. We are, I know, ready and willing to submit our lives and property to such discipline, because it makes possible a leadership which aims at a larger good. This I propose to offer, pledging that the larger purposes will bind upon us all as a sacred obligation with a unity of duty hitherto evoked only in time of armed strife.

If I'm reading the mood of our people correctly, we now understand, more than ever, how much we depend on one another; that we can't just take but have to give as well; that if we're going to move forward, we need to act as a united and devoted team, ready to sacrifice for the sake of a shared goal. Without that kind of commitment, we can't make progress, and leadership won’t work effectively. I believe we are ready and willing to commit our lives and resources to such discipline because it enables a leadership focused on a greater good. I want to put this forward, promising that our broader goals will be a shared responsibility, with a sense of duty that has only been seen in times of war.

With this pledge taken, I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems.

With this promise made, I confidently take on the leadership of this great army of our people committed to a focused effort on our shared challenges.

Action in this image and to this end is feasible under the form of government which we have inherited from our ancestors. Our Constitution is so simple and practical that it is possible always to meet extraordinary needs by changes in emphasis and arrangement without loss of essential form. That is why our constitutional system has proved itself the most superbly enduring political mechanism the modern world has produced. It has met every stress of vast expansion of territory, of foreign wars, of bitter internal strife, of world relations.

Action in this image and for this purpose is possible under the form of government we've inherited from our ancestors. Our Constitution is so straightforward and practical that we can always address extraordinary needs by shifting our focus and organization without losing its essential structure. That’s why our constitutional system has proven to be the most enduring political framework the modern world has created. It has successfully handled every challenge from significant territorial expansion, foreign wars, intense internal conflict, and global relations.

It is to be hoped that the normal balance of executive and legislative authority may be wholly adequate to meet the unprecedented task before us. But it may be that an unprecedented demand and need for undelayed action may call for temporary departure from that normal balance of public procedure.

It’s hoped that the usual balance of executive and legislative power will be enough to handle the unique challenges we face. However, it’s possible that the extraordinary demand for immediate action might require a temporary shift from that standard public procedure.

I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption.

I am ready, as required by my constitutional duty, to suggest the actions that a suffering nation in a troubled world may need. These actions, or other actions that Congress may devise from its experience and judgment, I will strive to bring to quick approval, within my constitutional authority.

But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis—broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.

But if Congress fails to take one of these two paths, and if the national emergency is still serious, I will not shy away from the clear responsibility that will then face me. I will ask Congress for the one remaining tool to handle the crisis—broad Executive power to fight the emergency, as significant as the power I would have if we were actually invaded by a foreign enemy.

For the trust reposed in me I will return the courage and the devotion that befit the time. I can do no less.

For the trust you've placed in me, I will give back the courage and dedication that this moment deserves. I can do no less.

We face the arduous days that lie before us in the warm courage of the national unity; with the clear consciousness of seeking old and precious moral values; with the clean satisfaction that comes from the stern performance of duty by old and young alike. We aim at the assurance of a rounded and permanent national life.

We confront the tough days ahead with the strong spirit of national unity, fully aware of the importance of preserving our cherished moral values, and with the genuine satisfaction that comes from the serious dedication to duty shared by both the young and the old. Our goal is to ensure a stable and lasting national life.

We do not distrust the future of essential democracy. The people of the United States have not failed. In their need they have registered a mandate that they want direct, vigorous action. They have asked for discipline and direction under leadership. They have made me the present instrument of their wishes. In the spirit of the gift I take it.

We have faith in the future of essential democracy. The people of the United States have not let us down. In their time of need, they have made it clear that they want direct and strong action. They have requested discipline and guidance under leadership. They have chosen me to carry out their wishes. I accept this role in the spirit of this gift.

In this dedication of a Nation we humbly ask the blessing of God. May He protect each and every one of us. May He guide me in the days to come.

In this dedication of a Nation, we sincerely seek God's blessing. May He protect all of us. May He guide me in the days ahead.






FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1937

[Transcriber's note: For the first time the inauguration of the President was held on January 20, pursuant to the provisions of the 20th amendment to the Constitution. Having won the election of 1936 by a wide margin, and looking forward to the advantage of Democratic gains in the House and Senate, the President confidently outlined the continuation of his programs. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico of the Capitol by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes.]

[Transcriber's note: For the first time, the inauguration of the President was held on January 20, following the rules set by the 20th amendment to the Constitution. After winning the 1936 election by a significant margin and anticipating further Democratic gains in the House and Senate, the President confidently outlined his plan to continue his programs. The oath of office was administered on the East Portico of the Capitol by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes.]


When four years ago we met to inaugurate a President, the Republic, single-minded in anxiety, stood in spirit here. We dedicated ourselves to the fulfillment of a vision—to speed the time when there would be for all the people that security and peace essential to the pursuit of happiness. We of the Republic pledged ourselves to drive from the temple of our ancient faith those who had profaned it; to end by action, tireless and unafraid, the stagnation and despair of that day. We did those first things first.

When we gathered four years ago to welcome a new President, the nation, united in concern, was present in spirit. We committed ourselves to achieving a vision—to hasten the moment when everyone would have the security and peace necessary for the pursuit of happiness. We, as a nation, promised to remove from the heart of our cherished beliefs those who had disrespected it; to actively, tirelessly, and fearlessly end the stagnation and despair of that time. We took care of those initial priorities first.

Our covenant with ourselves did not stop there. Instinctively we recognized a deeper need—the need to find through government the instrument of our united purpose to solve for the individual the ever-rising problems of a complex civilization. Repeated attempts at their solution without the aid of government had left us baffled and bewildered. For, without that aid, we had been unable to create those moral controls over the services of science which are necessary to make science a useful servant instead of a ruthless master of mankind. To do this we knew that we must find practical controls over blind economic forces and blindly selfish men.

Our agreement with ourselves didn’t end there. We instinctively understood a deeper need—the need to use government as the tool for our shared mission to tackle the growing challenges of a complex society for each individual. Our repeated attempts to resolve these issues without government support left us confused and frustrated. Because, without that support, we couldn't establish the moral guidelines for scientific services that are essential to make science a helpful servant instead of a harsh master over humanity. We realized that we needed to find practical ways to manage uncontrollable economic forces and selfish individuals.

We of the Republic sensed the truth that democratic government has innate capacity to protect its people against disasters once considered inevitable, to solve problems once considered unsolvable. We would not admit that we could not find a way to master economic epidemics just as, after centuries of fatalistic suffering, we had found a way to master epidemics of disease. We refused to leave the problems of our common welfare to be solved by the winds of chance and the hurricanes of disaster.

We in the Republic understood that a democratic government has the natural ability to protect its citizens from disasters that were once seen as unavoidable and to address issues that seemed impossible to solve. We wouldn’t accept that we couldn't find a way to handle economic crises just as, after centuries of hopeless suffering, we had found a way to overcome outbreaks of disease. We refused to let the challenges of our common well-being be left to chance and the chaos of disasters.

In this we Americans were discovering no wholly new truth; we were writing a new chapter in our book of self-government.

In this, we Americans weren't discovering any completely new truth; we were writing a new chapter in our story of self-government.

This year marks the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Constitutional Convention which made us a nation. At that Convention our forefathers found the way out of the chaos which followed the Revolutionary War; they created a strong government with powers of united action sufficient then and now to solve problems utterly beyond individual or local solution. A century and a half ago they established the Federal Government in order to promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to the American people.

This year marks the 150th anniversary of the Constitutional Convention that formed our nation. At that Convention, our founding fathers found a way to overcome the chaos that followed the Revolutionary War; they created a strong government with the unified powers needed then and now to address issues that individuals or localities couldn't solve alone. A century and a half ago, they established the Federal Government to promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty for the American people.

Today we invoke those same powers of government to achieve the same objectives.

Today, we call upon those same governmental powers to reach the same goals.

Four years of new experience have not belied our historic instinct. They hold out the clear hope that government within communities, government within the separate States, and government of the United States can do the things the times require, without yielding its democracy. Our tasks in the last four years did not force democracy to take a holiday.

Four years of new experiences haven't disproven our historical instincts. They offer us the clear hope that local government, state government, and federal government can meet the needs of the times without sacrificing democracy. The challenges we've faced in the last four years haven't required us to put democracy on hold.

Nearly all of us recognize that as intricacies of human relationships increase, so power to govern them also must increase—power to stop evil; power to do good. The essential democracy of our Nation and the safety of our people depend not upon the absence of power, but upon lodging it with those whom the people can change or continue at stated intervals through an honest and free system of elections. The Constitution of 1787 did not make our democracy impotent.

Almost all of us understand that as the complexities of human relationships grow, the ability to manage them must also grow—power to prevent harm; power to promote good. The fundamental democracy of our nation and the safety of our people rely not on having no power, but on giving that power to those whom the people can change or keep in place at regular intervals through a fair and honest election process. The Constitution of 1787 did not make our democracy weak.

In fact, in these last four years, we have made the exercise of all power more democratic; for we have begun to bring private autocratic powers into their proper subordination to the public's government. The legend that they were invincible—above and beyond the processes of a democracy—has been shattered. They have been challenged and beaten.

In fact, over the past four years, we have made the exercise of all power more democratic; we have started to place private autocratic powers under the proper control of the public government. The myth that they were unbeatable—above and beyond the processes of democracy—has been broken. They have been confronted and defeated.

Our progress out of the depression is obvious. But that is not all that you and I mean by the new order of things. Our pledge was not merely to do a patchwork job with secondhand materials. By using the new materials of social justice we have undertaken to erect on the old foundations a more enduring structure for the better use of future generations.

Our recovery from the depression is clear. But that's not the only thing you and I mean by the new order. Our promise wasn't just to do a quick fix with leftover materials. By using the new tools of social justice, we are committed to building a stronger structure on the old foundations for the benefit of future generations.

In that purpose we have been helped by achievements of mind and spirit. Old truths have been relearned; untruths have been unlearned. We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics. Out of the collapse of a prosperity whose builders boasted their practicality has come the conviction that in the long run economic morality pays. We are beginning to wipe out the line that divides the practical from the ideal; and in so doing we are fashioning an instrument of unimagined power for the establishment of a morally better world.

To that end, we've been supported by advancements in thought and spirit. Old truths have been rediscovered; falsehoods have been rejected. We’ve always understood that selfishness is morally wrong; now we realize it’s also bad for the economy. From the downfall of a prosperity built by those who claimed to be practical has emerged the belief that, in the long run, economic morality pays off. We’re starting to erase the dividing line between the practical and the ideal; and in doing so, we’re creating a powerful tool for establishing a morally better world.

This new understanding undermines the old admiration of worldly success as such. We are beginning to abandon our tolerance of the abuse of power by those who betray for profit the elementary decencies of life.

This new understanding challenges the old belief in valuing worldly success. We are starting to lose our acceptance of the abuse of power by those who compromise basic decency for profit.

In this process evil things formerly accepted will not be so easily condoned. Hard-headedness will not so easily excuse hardheartedness. We are moving toward an era of good feeling. But we realize that there can be no era of good feeling save among men of good will.

In this process, things that used to be accepted as evil won't be easily overlooked anymore. Stubbornness won't easily justify a lack of compassion. We are headed toward a time of positive relationships. However, we understand that there can be no time of positive relationships without goodwill among people.

For these reasons I am justified in believing that the greatest change we have witnessed has been the change in the moral climate of America.

For these reasons, I believe that the biggest change we've seen is the shift in the moral climate of America.

Among men of good will, science and democracy together offer an ever-richer life and ever-larger satisfaction to the individual. With this change in our moral climate and our rediscovered ability to improve our economic order, we have set our feet upon the road of enduring progress.

Among people of good intentions, science and democracy together provide a richer life and greater satisfaction for individuals. With this shift in our moral outlook and our renewed capacity to enhance our economic system, we have embarked on a path of lasting progress.

Shall we pause now and turn our back upon the road that lies ahead? Shall we call this the promised land? Or, shall we continue on our way? For "each age is a dream that is dying, or one that is coming to birth."

Shall we stop now and turn away from the road that stretches ahead? Should we call this the promised land? Or should we keep moving forward? Because "each era is a dream that is fading, or one that is being born."

Many voices are heard as we face a great decision. Comfort says, "Tarry a while." Opportunism says, "This is a good spot." Timidity asks, "How difficult is the road ahead?"

Many voices are heard as we confront a major decision. Comfort says, "Wait a bit." Opportunism says, "This is a good place." Timidity asks, "How tough is the path ahead?"

True, we have come far from the days of stagnation and despair. Vitality has been preserved. Courage and confidence have been restored. Mental and moral horizons have been extended.

True, we have come a long way from the days of being stuck and hopeless. Energy has been maintained. Courage and confidence have been regained. Our mental and moral perspectives have broadened.

But our present gains were won under the pressure of more than ordinary circumstances. Advance became imperative under the goad of fear and suffering. The times were on the side of progress.

But our current achievements came about due to extraordinary circumstances. Progress became necessary driven by fear and hardship. The times favored advancement.

To hold to progress today, however, is more difficult. Dulled conscience, irresponsibility, and ruthless self-interest already reappear. Such symptoms of prosperity may become portents of disaster! Prosperity already tests the persistence of our progressive purpose.

Staying committed to progress today is, however, more challenging. A blunted conscience, lack of responsibility, and ruthless self-interest are starting to show up again. These signs of prosperity could turn into warnings of trouble! Prosperity is already putting our dedication to progress to the test.

Let us ask again: Have we reached the goal of our vision of that fourth day of March 1933? Have we found our happy valley?

Let’s ask again: Have we achieved the vision we had for that fourth day of March 1933? Have we discovered our happy place?

I see a great nation, upon a great continent, blessed with a great wealth of natural resources. Its hundred and thirty million people are at peace among themselves; they are making their country a good neighbor among the nations. I see a United States which can demonstrate that, under democratic methods of government, national wealth can be translated into a spreading volume of human comforts hitherto unknown, and the lowest standard of living can be raised far above the level of mere subsistence.

I see a great nation on a vast continent, rich in natural resources. Its one hundred thirty million people are living in harmony with each other; they are striving to make their country a good neighbor to other nations. I see a United States that can show that, through democratic methods of government, national wealth can be transformed into a growing amount of human comforts never before experienced, elevating the lowest standard of living well above just mere survival.

But here is the challenge to our democracy: In this nation I see tens of millions of its citizens—a substantial part of its whole population—who at this very moment are denied the greater part of what the very lowest standards of today call the necessities of life.

But here’s the challenge to our democracy: In this nation, I see tens of millions of its citizens—a significant portion of the entire population—who, right now, are being denied the basic necessities of life that even the lowest standards today recognize as essential.

I see millions of families trying to live on incomes so meager that the pall of family disaster hangs over them day by day.

I see millions of families trying to get by on incomes so low that the threat of family crisis looms over them every single day.

I see millions whose daily lives in city and on farm continue under conditions labeled indecent by a so-called polite society half a century ago.

I see millions whose daily lives in the city and on farms continue under conditions that polite society would have deemed unacceptable fifty years ago.

I see millions denied education, recreation, and the opportunity to better their lot and the lot of their children.

I see millions who are denied education, leisure activities, and the chance to improve their situation and the situation of their children.

I see millions lacking the means to buy the products of farm and factory and by their poverty denying work and productiveness to many other millions.

I see millions who can't afford to buy the goods from farms and factories, and their poverty is depriving many other millions of jobs and productivity.

I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished.

I see a third of the country poorly housed, poorly dressed, and poorly fed.

It is not in despair that I paint you that picture. I paint it for you in hope—because the Nation, seeing and understanding the injustice in it, proposes to paint it out. We are determined to make every American citizen the subject of his country's interest and concern; and we will never regard any faithful law-abiding group within our borders as superfluous. The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.

I'm not painting this picture out of despair. I'm sharing it with you in hope—because the Nation, recognizing and understanding the injustice in it, intends to address it. We are committed to making every American citizen a priority for their country; we will never consider any loyal, law-abiding group within our borders as unnecessary. The measure of our progress is not whether we increase the wealth of those who have plenty; it's whether we ensure enough for those who have too little.

If I know aught of the spirit and purpose of our Nation, we will not listen to Comfort, Opportunism, and Timidity. We will carry on.

If I know anything about the spirit and purpose of our Nation, we will not give in to Comfort, Opportunism, and Timidity. We will keep going.

Overwhelmingly, we of the Republic are men and women of good will; men and women who have more than warm hearts of dedication; men and women who have cool heads and willing hands of practical purpose as well. They will insist that every agency of popular government use effective instruments to carry out their will.

Overwhelmingly, we in the Republic are people of good will; people who have more than just warm hearts of dedication; people who also have cool heads and capable hands for practical purposes. They will demand that every part of our government use effective tools to carry out their wishes.

Government is competent when all who compose it work as trustees for the whole people. It can make constant progress when it keeps abreast of all the facts. It can obtain justified support and legitimate criticism when the people receive true information of all that government does.

Government is effective when everyone involved acts as representatives for the entire population. It can consistently improve when it stays updated on all relevant information. It can gain rightful support and constructive feedback when the public is given accurate information about everything the government does.

If I know aught of the will of our people, they will demand that these conditions of effective government shall be created and maintained. They will demand a nation uncorrupted by cancers of injustice and, therefore, strong among the nations in its example of the will to peace.

If I know anything about what our people want, they will insist that we create and maintain conditions for effective government. They will want a nation free from the cancers of injustice and, as a result, strong among the nations by setting an example of the will for peace.

Today we reconsecrate our country to long-cherished ideals in a suddenly changed civilization. In every land there are always at work forces that drive men apart and forces that draw men together. In our personal ambitions we are individualists. But in our seeking for economic and political progress as a nation, we all go up, or else we all go down, as one people.

Today we dedicate our country again to the values we hold dear in a rapidly changing world. In every nation, there are always forces that push people apart and forces that bring people together. In our personal ambitions, we act as individuals. But in our pursuit of economic and political progress as a country, we either rise together or fall together, united as one people.

To maintain a democracy of effort requires a vast amount of patience in dealing with differing methods, a vast amount of humility. But out of the confusion of many voices rises an understanding of dominant public need. Then political leadership can voice common ideals, and aid in their realization.

To keep a democracy based on effort takes a lot of patience when dealing with different approaches, as well as a lot of humility. But from the chaos of many voices, an understanding of the public's major needs emerges. Then, political leaders can express shared ideals and help make them happen.

In taking again the oath of office as President of the United States, I assume the solemn obligation of leading the American people forward along the road over which they have chosen to advance.

In taking the oath of office again as President of the United States, I accept the serious responsibility of guiding the American people along the path they have decided to follow.

While this duty rests upon me I shall do my utmost to speak their purpose and to do their will, seeking Divine guidance to help us each and every one to give light to them that sit in darkness and to guide our feet into the way of peace.

While this responsibility is mine, I will do my best to express their intention and fulfill their wishes, asking for Divine guidance to help each of us bring light to those who are in darkness and to lead our footsteps toward peace.






FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, THIRD INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, JANUARY 20, 1941

[Transcriber's note: The only chief executive to serve more than two terms, President Roosevelt took office for the third time as Europe and Asia engaged in war. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes on the East Portico of the Capitol. The Roosevelts hosted a reception for several thousand visitors at the White House later that day.]

[Transcriber's note: The only president to serve more than two terms, President Roosevelt took office for the third time while Europe and Asia were at war. Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes administered the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. The Roosevelts hosted a reception for several thousand guests at the White House later that day.]


On each national day of inauguration since 1789, the people have renewed their sense of dedication to the United States.

On each national inauguration day since 1789, people have renewed their commitment to the United States.

In Washington's day the task of the people was to create and weld together a nation.

In Washington's time, the people's job was to build and unify a nation.

In Lincoln's day the task of the people was to preserve that Nation from disruption from within.

In Lincoln's time, the people’s job was to protect the Nation from breaking apart from the inside.

In this day the task of the people is to save that Nation and its institutions from disruption from without.

Nowadays, the job of the people is to protect that Nation and its institutions from outside disruptions.

To us there has come a time, in the midst of swift happenings, to pause for a moment and take stock—to recall what our place in history has been, and to rediscover what we are and what we may be. If we do not, we risk the real peril of inaction.

To us, there has come a moment, amidst rapid events, to take a pause and reflect—to remember our place in history and to rediscover who we are and who we can become. If we don’t, we face the genuine danger of inaction.

Lives of nations are determined not by the count of years, but by the lifetime of the human spirit. The life of a man is three-score years and ten: a little more, a little less. The life of a nation is the fullness of the measure of its will to live.

The fate of nations isn't measured by the number of years but by the vitality of the human spirit. A person's life usually lasts about seventy years—give or take a little. A nation's life is defined by how deeply it wants to thrive.

There are men who doubt this. There are men who believe that democracy, as a form of Government and a frame of life, is limited or measured by a kind of mystical and artificial fate that, for some unexplained reason, tyranny and slavery have become the surging wave of the future—and that freedom is an ebbing tide.

There are some men who doubt this. There are men who think that democracy, as a way of governing and living, is restricted or shaped by a sort of mystical and artificial fate that, for some unknown reason, tyranny and slavery are becoming the rising wave of the future—and that freedom is a receding tide.

But we Americans know that this is not true.

But we Americans know that this isn't true.

Eight years ago, when the life of this Republic seemed frozen by a fatalistic terror, we proved that this is not true. We were in the midst of shock—but we acted. We acted quickly, boldly, decisively.

Eight years ago, when it felt like this Republic was stuck in a paralyzing fear, we showed that wasn’t the case. We were in shock—but we took action. We acted quickly, bravely, and with purpose.

These later years have been living years—fruitful years for the people of this democracy. For they have brought to us greater security and, I hope, a better understanding that life's ideals are to be measured in other than material things. Most vital to our present and our future is this experience of a democracy which successfully survived crisis at home; put away many evil things; built new structures on enduring lines; and, through it all, maintained the fact of its democracy.

These recent years have been significant—productive years for the people of this democracy. They have brought us more security and, I hope, a deeper understanding that life's values should be measured beyond just material possessions. Most important for our present and future is this experience of a democracy that has successfully navigated crises at home; eliminated many harmful issues; built new foundations on strong principles; and, throughout it all, preserved the essence of its democracy.

For action has been taken within the three-way framework of the Constitution of the United States. The coordinate branches of the Government continue freely to function. The Bill of Rights remains inviolate. The freedom of elections is wholly maintained. Prophets of the downfall of American democracy have seen their dire predictions come to naught.

Action has been taken within the three-part structure of the Constitution of the United States. The different branches of government continue to operate without interference. The Bill of Rights is still protected. The integrity of elections is fully upheld. Those who predicted the downfall of American democracy have seen their grim forecasts fall flat.

Democracy is not dying.

Democracy isn't dying.

We know it because we have seen it revive—and grow.

We know it because we have seen it come back to life—and grow.

We know it cannot die—because it is built on the unhampered initiative of individual men and women joined together in a common enterprise—an enterprise undertaken and carried through by the free expression of a free majority.

We know it can't die—because it's based on the unhindered initiative of individual men and women coming together in a shared endeavor—an endeavor carried out by the open expression of a free majority.

We know it because democracy alone, of all forms of government, enlists the full force of men's enlightened will.

We know this because democracy, more than any other form of government, harnesses the full power of people's informed choices.

We know it because democracy alone has constructed an unlimited civilization capable of infinite progress in the improvement of human life.

We know this because democracy has created a limitless civilization that can continually progress in enhancing human life.

We know it because, if we look below the surface, we sense it still spreading on every continent—for it is the most humane, the most advanced, and in the end the most unconquerable of all forms of human society.

We know this because, if we look beneath the surface, we can feel it still spreading across every continent—because it is the most compassionate, the most progressive, and ultimately the most unstoppable form of human society.

A nation, like a person, has a body—a body that must be fed and clothed and housed, invigorated and rested, in a manner that measures up to the objectives of our time.

A nation, like an individual, has a body—a body that needs to be fed, clothed, and sheltered, energized and rested, in a way that aligns with the goals of our era.

A nation, like a person, has a mind—a mind that must be kept informed and alert, that must know itself, that understands the hopes and the needs of its neighbors—all the other nations that live within the narrowing circle of the world.

A nation, like an individual, has a mind—one that must stay informed and vigilant, that needs to know itself, and understands the hopes and needs of its neighbors—all the other nations that exist within the increasingly small circle of the world.

And a nation, like a person, has something deeper, something more permanent, something larger than the sum of all its parts. It is that something which matters most to its future—which calls forth the most sacred guarding of its present.

And a nation, like an individual, has something deeper, something more lasting, something bigger than just the total of all its parts. It’s that essence that is most important for its future—which demands the most sacred protection of its present.

It is a thing for which we find it difficult—even impossible—to hit upon a single, simple word.

It’s something for which we find it hard—even impossible—to come up with a single, simple word.

And yet we all understand what it is—the spirit—the faith of America. It is the product of centuries. It was born in the multitudes of those who came from many lands—some of high degree, but mostly plain people, who sought here, early and late, to find freedom more freely.

And yet we all know what it is—the spirit—the faith of America. It's the result of centuries of history. It was created by the countless individuals who came from many different places—some of high status, but mostly ordinary people, who came here, both early and late, in search of greater freedom.

The democratic aspiration is no mere recent phase in human history. It is human history. It permeated the ancient life of early peoples. It blazed anew in the middle ages. It was written in Magna Charta.

The desire for democracy is not just a recent development in human history. It is human history. It was present in the lives of early civilizations. It reignited in the Middle Ages. It was enshrined in the Magna Carta.

In the Americas its impact has been irresistible. America has been the New World in all tongues, to all peoples, not because this continent was a new-found land, but because all those who came here believed they could create upon this continent a new life—a life that should be new in freedom.

In the Americas, its influence has been undeniable. America has been the New World in every language, for all cultures, not because this continent was newly discovered, but because everyone who arrived here believed they could build a new life on this land—a life that would be characterized by freedom.

Its vitality was written into our own Mayflower Compact, into the Declaration of Independence, into the Constitution of the United States, into the Gettysburg Address.

Its vitality is woven into our Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Gettysburg Address.

Those who first came here to carry out the longings of their spirit, and the millions who followed, and the stock that sprang from them—all have moved forward constantly and consistently toward an ideal which in itself has gained stature and clarity with each generation.

Those who initially arrived here to fulfill their spiritual desires, along with the millions who followed and their descendants—all have continuously and consistently advanced toward an ideal that has grown in significance and clarity with each generation.

The hopes of the Republic cannot forever tolerate either undeserved poverty or self-serving wealth.

The hopes of the Republic can't forever accept either unfair poverty or selfish wealth.

We know that we still have far to go; that we must more greatly build the security and the opportunity and the knowledge of every citizen, in the measure justified by the resources and the capacity of the land.

We know that we still have a long way to go; that we must better create security, opportunity, and knowledge for every citizen, based on the resources and capabilities of our land.

But it is not enough to achieve these purposes alone. It is not enough to clothe and feed the body of this Nation, and instruct and inform its mind. For there is also the spirit. And of the three, the greatest is the spirit.

But achieving these goals alone isn't enough. It's not enough to just clothe and feed the body of this Nation and educate its mind. There's also the spirit. And of the three, the spirit is the greatest.

Without the body and the mind, as all men know, the Nation could not live.

Without the body and the mind, as everyone knows, the Nation couldn't survive.

But if the spirit of America were killed, even though the Nation's body and mind, constricted in an alien world, lived on, the America we know would have perished.

But if the spirit of America were to die, even if the Nation's body and mind, limited in a foreign world, continued to exist, the America we recognize would have vanished.

That spirit—that faith—speaks to us in our daily lives in ways often unnoticed, because they seem so obvious. It speaks to us here in the Capital of the Nation. It speaks to us through the processes of governing in the sovereignties of 48 States. It speaks to us in our counties, in our cities, in our towns, and in our villages. It speaks to us from the other nations of the hemisphere, and from those across the seas—the enslaved, as well as the free. Sometimes we fail to hear or heed these voices of freedom because to us the privilege of our freedom is such an old, old story.

That spirit—that faith—talks to us in our everyday lives in ways we often overlook because they seem so obvious. It talks to us right here in the Nation's Capital. It talks to us through the governing processes of 48 states. It talks to us in our counties, our cities, our towns, and our villages. It talks to us from other nations in the hemisphere and from those across the seas—the enslaved as well as the free. Sometimes we don't hear or pay attention to these voices of freedom because the privilege of our freedom feels like such an old story.

The destiny of America was proclaimed in words of prophecy spoken by our first President in his first inaugural in 1789—words almost directed, it would seem, to this year of 1941: "The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered... deeply,... finally, staked on the experiment intrusted to the hands of the American people."

The fate of America was declared in prophetic words spoken by our first President in his first inaugural address in 1789—words that seem almost aimed at this year of 1941: "The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are rightly seen... deeply,... finally, dependent on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people."

If we lose that sacred fire—if we let it be smothered with doubt and fear—then we shall reject the destiny which Washington strove so valiantly and so triumphantly to establish. The preservation of the spirit and faith of the Nation does, and will, furnish the highest justification for every sacrifice that we may make in the cause of national defense.

If we lose that sacred passion—if we allow it to be extinguished by doubt and fear—then we will turn our backs on the destiny that Washington fought so hard and so successfully to create. Keeping the spirit and faith of the Nation alive does, and will, provide the greatest reason for any sacrifices we make in the name of national defense.

In the face of great perils never before encountered, our strong purpose is to protect and to perpetuate the integrity of democracy.

In the face of unprecedented dangers, our firm goal is to safeguard and maintain the integrity of democracy.

For this we muster the spirit of America, and the faith of America.

For this, we gather the spirit of America and the belief of America.

We do not retreat. We are not content to stand still. As Americans, we go forward, in the service of our country, by the will of God.

We do not back down. We're not satisfied to just stay where we are. As Americans, we move ahead, serving our country, guided by God's will.






FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, FOURTH INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, JANUARY 20, 1945

[Transcriber's note: The fourth inauguration was conducted without fanfare. Because of the expense and impropriety of festivity during the height of war, the oath of office was taken on the South Portico of the White House. It was administered by Chief Justice Harlan Stone. No formal celebrations followed the address. Instead of renominating Vice President Henry Wallace in the election of 1944, the Democratic convention chose the Senator from Missouri, Harry S. Truman.]

[Transcriber's note: The fourth inauguration was done without any fanfare. Due to the costs and inappropriateness of ceremonies during wartime, the oath of office was taken on the South Portico of the White House. It was administered by Chief Justice Harlan Stone. There were no formal celebrations after the address. Instead of renominating Vice President Henry Wallace for the 1944 election, the Democratic convention selected the Senator from Missouri, Harry S. Truman.]


Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Vice President, my friends, you will understand and, I believe, agree with my wish that the form of this inauguration be simple and its words brief.

Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Vice President, my friends, you will understand and, I believe, agree with my desire for this inauguration to be straightforward and for my speech to be short.

We Americans of today, together with our allies, are passing through a period of supreme test. It is a test of our courage—of our resolve—of our wisdom—our essential democracy.

We Americans today, along with our allies, are going through a time of great challenge. It’s a test of our bravery—of our determination—of our intelligence—of our fundamental democracy.

If we meet that test—successfully and honorably—we shall perform a service of historic importance which men and women and children will honor throughout all time.

If we pass that test—successfully and with integrity—we will provide a service of historic significance that people of all ages will honor forever.

As I stand here today, having taken the solemn oath of office in the presence of my fellow countrymen—in the presence of our God—I know that it is America's purpose that we shall not fail.

As I stand here today, having taken the serious oath of office in front of my fellow citizens—in front of our God—I know that it's America's mission that we won't fail.

In the days and in the years that are to come we shall work for a just and honorable peace, a durable peace, as today we work and fight for total victory in war.

In the days and years ahead, we will strive for a fair and honorable peace, a lasting peace, just as we are working and fighting today for complete victory in war.

We can and we will achieve such a peace.

We can and we will achieve that peace.

We shall strive for perfection. We shall not achieve it immediately—but we still shall strive. We may make mistakes—but they must never be mistakes which result from faintness of heart or abandonment of moral principle.

We will aim for perfection. We may not achieve it right away—but we will keep trying. We might make mistakes—but those mistakes can never come from a lack of courage or giving up on our values.

I remember that my old schoolmaster, Dr. Peabody, said, in days that seemed to us then to be secure and untroubled: "Things in life will not always run smoothly. Sometimes we will be rising toward the heights—then all will seem to reverse itself and start downward. The great fact to remember is that the trend of civilization itself is forever upward; that a line drawn through the middle of the peaks and the valleys of the centuries always has an upward trend."

I remember my old teacher, Dr. Peabody, saying, in days that felt safe and peaceful: "Life won't always go smoothly. Sometimes we'll be climbing to new heights—then everything will seem to turn around and head downwards. The important thing to remember is that the overall direction of civilization is always upward; a line drawn through the highs and lows of the centuries always trends upward."

Our Constitution of 1787 was not a perfect instrument; it is not perfect yet. But it provided a firm base upon which all manner of men, of all races and colors and creeds, could build our solid structure of democracy.

Our Constitution of 1787 wasn’t a perfect document; it’s still not perfect today. But it laid a strong foundation on which people of all races, colors, and beliefs can build our solid democracy.

And so today, in this year of war, 1945, we have learned lessons—at a fearful cost—and we shall profit by them.

And so today, in this year of war, 1945, we've learned lessons—at a heavy cost—and we'll benefit from them.

We have learned that we cannot live alone, at peace; that our own well-being is dependent on the well-being of other nations far away. We have learned that we must live as men, not as ostriches, nor as dogs in the manger.

We have learned that we can’t live in isolation, at peace; that our well-being relies on the well-being of other nations that are far away. We have learned that we need to live as humans, not as ostriches, nor as selfish creatures that hoard resources.

We have learned to be citizens of the world, members of the human community.

We have learned to be global citizens, part of the human community.

We have learned the simple truth, as Emerson said, that "The only way to have a friend is to be one."

We have learned the simple truth, as Emerson said, that "The only way to have a friend is to be one."

We can gain no lasting peace if we approach it with suspicion and mistrust or with fear. We can gain it only if we proceed with the understanding, the confidence, and the courage which flow from conviction.

We can't achieve lasting peace if we come at it with suspicion, distrust, or fear. We can only achieve it if we move forward with the understanding, confidence, and courage that come from our beliefs.

The Almighty God has blessed our land in many ways. He has given our people stout hearts and strong arms with which to strike mighty blows for freedom and truth. He has given to our country a faith which has become the hope of all peoples in an anguished world.

The Almighty God has blessed our land in many ways. He has given our people strong hearts and capable arms with which to fight bravely for freedom and truth. He has provided our country with a faith that has become the hope for all people in a troubled world.

So we pray to Him now for the vision to see our way clearly—to see the way that leads to a better life for ourselves and for all our fellow men—to the achievement of His will to peace on earth.

So we pray to Him now for the clarity to see our path clearly—to see the way that leads to a better life for ourselves and for everyone around us—to fulfill His will for peace on earth.






HARRY S. TRUMAN, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 1949

[Transcriber's note: A former county judge, Senator and Vice President, Harry S. Truman had taken the oath of office first on April 12, 1945, upon the death of President Roosevelt. Mr. Truman's victory in the 1948 election was so unexpected that many newspapers had declared the Republican candidate, Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York, the winner. The President went to the East Portico of the Capitol to take the oath of office on two Bibles—the personal one he had used for the first oath, and a Gutenberg Bible donated by the citizens of Independence, Missouri. The ceremony was televised as well as broadcast on the radio.]

[Transcriber's note: A former county judge, Senator, and Vice President, Harry S. Truman first took the oath of office on April 12, 1945, after President Roosevelt passed away. Mr. Truman's win in the 1948 election was so surprising that many newspapers had already declared the Republican candidate, Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York, the winner. The President went to the East Portico of the Capitol to take the oath of office on two Bibles—the personal one he used for his first oath, and a Gutenberg Bible donated by the people of Independence, Missouri. The ceremony was both televised and broadcast on the radio.]


Mr. Vice President, Mr. Chief Justice, and fellow citizens, I accept with humility the honor which the American people have conferred upon me. I accept it with a deep resolve to do all that I can for the welfare of this Nation and for the peace of the world.

Mr. Vice President, Mr. Chief Justice, and fellow citizens, I humbly accept the honor that the American people have given me. I'm committed to doing everything I can for the well-being of this Nation and for world peace.

In performing the duties of my office, I need the help and prayers of every one of you. I ask for your encouragement and your support. The tasks we face are difficult, and we can accomplish them only if we work together.

In carrying out my responsibilities, I need the help and prayers of all of you. I ask for your encouragement and support. The challenges we face are tough, and we can only achieve them if we work together.

Each period of our national history has had its special challenges. Those that confront us now are as momentous as any in the past. Today marks the beginning not only of a new administration, but of a period that will be eventful, perhaps decisive, for us and for the world.

Each era of our national history has faced its unique challenges. The ones we face now are as significant as any we've encountered before. Today marks the start not just of a new administration, but of a time that will be impactful, possibly crucial, for us and for the world.

It may be our lot to experience, and in large measure to bring about, a major turning point in the long history of the human race. The first half of this century has been marked by unprecedented and brutal attacks on the rights of man, and by the two most frightful wars in history. The supreme need of our time is for men to learn to live together in peace and harmony.

It might be our fate to witness, and largely to cause, a major turning point in the long history of humanity. The first half of this century has been characterized by unprecedented and brutal assaults on human rights, as well as the two most horrific wars in history. The greatest need of our time is for people to learn to live together in peace and harmony.

The peoples of the earth face the future with grave uncertainty, composed almost equally of great hopes and great fears. In this time of doubt, they look to the United States as never before for good will, strength, and wise leadership.

The people of the world look to the future with serious uncertainty, filled almost equally with high hopes and deep fears. In this time of doubt, they turn to the United States like never before for goodwill, strength, and wise leadership.

It is fitting, therefore, that we take this occasion to proclaim to the world the essential principles of the faith by which we live, and to declare our aims to all peoples.

It’s appropriate, then, that we use this opportunity to share with the world the core principles of the faith we uphold and to express our goals to everyone.

The American people stand firm in the faith which has inspired this Nation from the beginning. We believe that all men have a right to equal justice under law and equal opportunity to share in the common good. We believe that all men have the right to freedom of thought and expression. We believe that all men are created equal because they are created in the image of God.

The American people remain steadfast in the beliefs that have motivated this nation since its inception. We believe that everyone deserves equal justice under the law and equal opportunities to benefit from the common good. We believe that everyone has the right to freedom of thought and expression. We believe that all people are created equal because they are made in the image of God.

From this faith we will not be moved.

From this faith, we will not be shaken.

The American people desire, and are determined to work for, a world in which all nations and all peoples are free to govern themselves as they see fit, and to achieve a decent and satisfying life. Above all else, our people desire, and are determined to work for, peace on earth—a just and lasting peace—based on genuine agreement freely arrived at by equals.

The American people want and are committed to creating a world where all nations and all people can govern themselves as they choose and achieve a decent and fulfilling life. Above all, our people want and are determined to strive for peace on earth—a fair and lasting peace—built on genuine agreements made freely by equals.

In the pursuit of these aims, the United States and other like-minded nations find themselves directly opposed by a regime with contrary aims and a totally different concept of life.

In pursuing these goals, the United States and other like-minded countries are directly confronted by a regime with opposing aims and a completely different perspective on life.

That regime adheres to a false philosophy which purports to offer freedom, security, and greater opportunity to mankind. Misled by this philosophy, many peoples have sacrificed their liberties only to learn to their sorrow that deceit and mockery, poverty and tyranny, are their reward.

That regime follows a deceptive ideology that claims to provide freedom, security, and better opportunities for humanity. Misguided by this ideology, many people have given up their liberties, only to discover, to their dismay, that deceit, ridicule, poverty, and oppression are what they receive in return.

That false philosophy is communism.

That flawed ideology is communism.

Communism is based on the belief that man is so weak and inadequate that he is unable to govern himself, and therefore requires the rule of strong masters.

Communism is founded on the idea that people are so weak and incapable that they can't govern themselves, which is why they need to be ruled by powerful leaders.

Democracy is based on the conviction that man has the moral and intellectual capacity, as well as the inalienable right, to govern himself with reason and justice.

Democracy is built on the belief that everyone has the moral and intellectual ability, along with the undeniable right, to govern themselves with reason and fairness.

Communism subjects the individual to arrest without lawful cause, punishment without trial, and forced labor as the chattel of the state. It decrees what information he shall receive, what art he shall produce, what leaders he shall follow, and what thoughts he shall think.

Communism puts individuals under arrest without legal reason, punishes them without a trial, and forces them into labor as property of the state. It decides what information they will receive, what art they will create, which leaders they will support, and what thoughts they are allowed to have.

Democracy maintains that government is established for the benefit of the individual, and is charged with the responsibility of protecting the rights of the individual and his freedom in the exercise of his abilities.

Democracy holds that government is created for the benefit of the individual and is responsible for protecting the rights of individuals and their freedom to use their abilities.

Communism maintains that social wrongs can be corrected only by violence.

Communism believes that social injustices can only be fixed through violence.

Democracy has proved that social justice can be achieved through peaceful change.

Democracy has shown that social justice can be reached through peaceful change.

Communism holds that the world is so deeply divided into opposing classes that war is inevitable.

Communism argues that the world is so fundamentally divided into opposing classes that conflict is unavoidable.

Democracy holds that free nations can settle differences justly and maintain lasting peace.

Democracy believes that free countries can resolve their differences fairly and keep lasting peace.

These differences between communism and democracy do not concern the United States alone. People everywhere are coming to realize that what is involved is material well-being, human dignity, and the right to believe in and worship God.

These differences between communism and democracy aren't just a concern for the United States. People everywhere are starting to understand that what's at stake is financial stability, human dignity, and the freedom to believe in and worship God.

I state these differences, not to draw issues of belief as such, but because the actions resulting from the Communist philosophy are a threat to the efforts of free nations to bring about world recovery and lasting peace.

I point out these differences not to challenge beliefs, but because the actions that come from Communist philosophy threaten the efforts of free nations to achieve global recovery and lasting peace.

Since the end of hostilities, the United States has invested its substance and its energy in a great constructive effort to restore peace, stability, and freedom to the world.

Since the end of the fighting, the United States has put its resources and energy into a significant effort to bring peace, stability, and freedom back to the world.

We have sought no territory and we have imposed our will on none. We have asked for no privileges we would not extend to others.

We haven’t sought any land, nor have we forced our will on anyone. We haven’t asked for any privileges that we wouldn’t give to others.

We have constantly and vigorously supported the United Nations and related agencies as a means of applying democratic principles to international relations. We have consistently advocated and relied upon peaceful settlement of disputes among nations.

We have always and actively supported the United Nations and its agencies as a way to implement democratic principles in international relations. We have continually promoted and depended on the peaceful resolution of disputes between nations.

We have made every effort to secure agreement on effective international control of our most powerful weapon, and we have worked steadily for the limitation and control of all armaments.

We have done everything possible to reach an agreement on effective international control of our most powerful weapon, and we have consistently worked towards the limitation and control of all weapons.

We have encouraged, by precept and example, the expansion of world trade on a sound and fair basis.

We have promoted, through our teachings and actions, the growth of global trade in a fair and responsible way.

Almost a year ago, in company with 16 free nations of Europe, we launched the greatest cooperative economic program in history. The purpose of that unprecedented effort is to invigorate and strengthen democracy in Europe, so that the free people of that continent can resume their rightful place in the forefront of civilization and can contribute once more to the security and welfare of the world.

Almost a year ago, together with 16 free nations of Europe, we started the biggest economic cooperation program in history. The goal of this unprecedented initiative is to energize and bolster democracy in Europe, so that the free people of that continent can reclaim their rightful position at the forefront of civilization and can once again contribute to the security and well-being of the world.

Our efforts have brought new hope to all mankind. We have beaten back despair and defeatism. We have saved a number of countries from losing their liberty. Hundreds of millions of people all over the world now agree with us, that we need not have war—that we can have peace.

Our efforts have brought new hope to everyone. We have pushed back despair and defeatism. We have helped several countries maintain their freedom. Hundreds of millions of people around the globe now agree with us that we don't need war—that we can have peace.

The initiative is ours.

The initiative is ours.

We are moving on with other nations to build an even stronger structure of international order and justice. We shall have as our partners countries which, no longer solely concerned with the problem of national survival, are now working to improve the standards of living of all their people. We are ready to undertake new projects to strengthen the free world.

We are progressing with other nations to create an even stronger framework for international order and justice. Our partners will be countries that, instead of just focusing on national survival, are now dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for all their citizens. We are prepared to take on new initiatives to empower the free world.

In the coming years, our program for peace and freedom will emphasize four major courses of action.

In the upcoming years, our peace and freedom program will focus on four key actions.

First, we will continue to give unfaltering support to the United Nations and related agencies, and we will continue to search for ways to strengthen their authority and increase their effectiveness. We believe that the United Nations will be strengthened by the new nations which are being formed in lands now advancing toward self-government under democratic principles.

First, we will keep providing strong support to the United Nations and its related agencies, and we will keep looking for ways to strengthen their authority and enhance their effectiveness. We believe that the United Nations will become stronger with the new nations that are forming in regions now moving towards self-government based on democratic principles.

Second, we will continue our programs for world economic recovery.

Second, we will keep our programs going for global economic recovery.

This means, first of all, that we must keep our full weight behind the European recovery program. We are confident of the success of this major venture in world recovery. We believe that our partners in this effort will achieve the status of self-supporting nations once again.

This means, first of all, that we need to fully support the European recovery program. We are confident in the success of this significant initiative for global recovery. We believe that our partners in this effort will once again become self-sustaining nations.

In addition, we must carry out our plans for reducing the barriers to world trade and increasing its volume. Economic recovery and peace itself depend on increased world trade.

Additionally, we need to implement our plans to lower the barriers to global trade and boost its volume. Economic recovery and peace rely on expanding international trade.

Third, we will strengthen freedom-loving nations against the dangers of aggression.

Third, we will support nations that value freedom against the threats of aggression.

We are now working out with a number of countries a joint agreement designed to strengthen the security of the North Atlantic area. Such an agreement would take the form of a collective defense arrangement within the terms of the United Nations Charter.

We are currently collaborating with several countries on a joint agreement aimed at enhancing the security of the North Atlantic region. This agreement would be a collective defense arrangement in line with the United Nations Charter.

We have already established such a defense pact for the Western Hemisphere by the treaty of Rio de Janeiro.

We have already set up a defense agreement for the Western Hemisphere through the treaty of Rio de Janeiro.

The primary purpose of these agreements is to provide unmistakable proof of the joint determination of the free countries to resist armed attack from any quarter. Each country participating in these arrangements must contribute all it can to the common defense.

The main goal of these agreements is to offer clear evidence of the united commitment of free nations to defend against armed attacks from anywhere. Each country involved in these arrangements must do everything it can to support the collective defense.

If we can make it sufficiently clear, in advance, that any armed attack affecting our national security would be met with overwhelming force, the armed attack might never occur.

If we can clearly communicate ahead of time that any armed attack threatening our national security will be responded to with overwhelming force, that attack might never take place.

I hope soon to send to the Senate a treaty respecting the North Atlantic security plan.

I hope to send a treaty regarding the North Atlantic security plan to the Senate soon.

In addition, we will provide military advice and equipment to free nations which will cooperate with us in the maintenance of peace and security.

We will also offer military advice and equipment to nations that are willing to work with us to maintain peace and security.

Fourth, we must embark on a bold new program for making the benefits of our scientific advances and industrial progress available for the improvement and growth of underdeveloped areas.

Fourth, we need to start an ambitious new initiative to ensure that the advantages of our scientific advancements and industrial growth are accessible for the development and improvement of underdeveloped regions.

More than half the people of the world are living in conditions approaching misery. Their food is inadequate. They are victims of disease. Their economic life is primitive and stagnant. Their poverty is a handicap and a threat both to them and to more prosperous areas.

More than half the people in the world are living in near misery. Their food is insufficient. They suffer from diseases. Their economic situation is basic and stagnant. Their poverty is both a burden and a danger to themselves and to wealthier regions.

For the first time in history, humanity possesses the knowledge and the skill to relieve the suffering of these people.

For the first time ever, humanity has the knowledge and skills to ease the suffering of these individuals.

The United States is pre-eminent among nations in the development of industrial and scientific techniques. The material resources which we can afford to use for the assistance of other peoples are limited. But our imponderable resources in technical knowledge are constantly growing and are inexhaustible.

The United States stands out among countries in developing industrial and scientific techniques. The material resources we can share with other nations are limited. However, our vast knowledge in technology continues to grow and is limitless.

I believe that we should make available to peace-loving peoples the benefits of our store of technical knowledge in order to help them realize their aspirations for a better life. And, in cooperation with other nations, we should foster capital investment in areas needing development.

I think we should share our technical knowledge with peace-loving people to help them achieve their hopes for a better life. And, by working together with other countries, we should encourage investment in regions that need development.

Our aim should be to help the free peoples of the world, through their own efforts, to produce more food, more clothing, more materials for housing, and more mechanical power to lighten their burdens.

Our goal should be to support the free people of the world in their efforts to produce more food, clothing, housing materials, and mechanical power to ease their burdens.

We invite other countries to pool their technological resources in this undertaking. Their contributions will be warmly welcomed. This should be a cooperative enterprise in which all nations work together through the United Nations and its specialized agencies wherever practicable. It must be a worldwide effort for the achievement of peace, plenty, and freedom.

We invite other countries to combine their technological resources for this initiative. Their contributions will be greatly appreciated. This should be a joint effort where all nations collaborate through the United Nations and its specialized agencies whenever possible. It must be a global endeavor aimed at achieving peace, abundance, and freedom.

With the cooperation of business, private capital, agriculture, and labor in this country, this program can greatly increase the industrial activity in other nations and can raise substantially their standards of living.

With the collaboration of businesses, private investors, agriculture, and workers in this country, this program can significantly boost industrial activity in other nations and greatly improve their living standards.

Such new economic developments must be devised and controlled to benefit the peoples of the areas in which they are established. Guarantees to the investor must be balanced by guarantees in the interest of the people whose resources and whose labor go into these developments.

Such new economic developments need to be planned and managed to benefit the people in the areas where they are established. Investor guarantees must be balanced with guarantees that protect the interests of the people whose resources and labor contribute to these developments.

The old imperialism—exploitation for foreign profit—has no place in our plans. What we envisage is a program of development based on the concepts of democratic fair-dealing.

The old imperialism—exploiting for foreign profit—doesn’t fit into our plans. What we see is a development program rooted in the ideas of fair and democratic dealings.

All countries, including our own, will greatly benefit from a constructive program for the better use of the world's human and natural resources. Experience shows that our commerce with other countries expands as they progress industrially and economically.

All countries, including ours, will really benefit from a positive program for making better use of the world's human and natural resources. Experience shows that our trade with other countries grows as they advance industrially and economically.

Greater production is the key to prosperity and peace. And the key to greater production is a wider and more vigorous application of modern scientific and technical knowledge.

Greater production is the key to prosperity and peace. And the key to greater production is a broader and more energetic use of modern scientific and technical knowledge.

Only by helping the least fortunate of its members to help themselves can the human family achieve the decent, satisfying life that is the right of all people.

Only by helping the least fortunate among us to help themselves can the human family achieve the decent, fulfilling life that everyone deserves.

Democracy alone can supply the vitalizing force to stir the peoples of the world into triumphant action, not only against their human oppressors, but also against their ancient enemies—hunger, misery, and despair.

Democracy is the only thing that can energize the people of the world to take bold action, not just against their human oppressors, but also against their age-old enemies—hunger, suffering, and despair.

On the basis of these four major courses of action we hope to help create the conditions that will lead eventually to personal freedom and happiness for all mankind.

Based on these four main courses of action, we aim to create the conditions that will ultimately lead to personal freedom and happiness for everyone.

If we are to be successful in carrying out these policies, it is clear that we must have continued prosperity in this country and we must keep ourselves strong.

If we want to be successful in implementing these policies, it’s clear that we need to maintain ongoing prosperity in this country and stay strong.

Slowly but surely we are weaving a world fabric of international security and growing prosperity.

Slowly but surely, we're creating a global network of security and increasing prosperity.

We are aided by all who wish to live in freedom from fear—even by those who live today in fear under their own governments.

We are supported by everyone who wants to live freely without fear—even by those who are currently living in fear under their own governments.

We are aided by all who want relief from the lies of propaganda—who desire truth and sincerity.

We are supported by everyone who wants to escape the lies of propaganda—who seek truth and honesty.

We are aided by all who desire self-government and a voice in deciding their own affairs.

We are supported by everyone who wants self-governance and a say in managing their own issues.

We are aided by all who long for economic security—for the security and abundance that men in free societies can enjoy.

We are supported by everyone who desires financial stability— for the security and prosperity that people in free societies can experience.

We are aided by all who desire freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom to live their own lives for useful ends.

We are supported by everyone who values freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to live their lives for meaningful purposes.

Our allies are the millions who hunger and thirst after righteousness.

Our allies are the millions who crave justice and seek what’s right.

In due time, as our stability becomes manifest, as more and more nations come to know the benefits of democracy and to participate in growing abundance, I believe that those countries which now oppose us will abandon their delusions and join with the free nations of the world in a just settlement of international differences.

In time, as our stability becomes clear and more nations experience the benefits of democracy and share in increasing prosperity, I believe that those countries currently opposed to us will give up their illusions and come together with the free nations of the world to resolve international conflicts fairly.

Events have brought our American democracy to new influence and new responsibilities. They will test our courage, our devotion to duty, and our concept of liberty.

Events have pushed our American democracy into new levels of influence and responsibilities. They will challenge our courage, our commitment to duty, and our understanding of freedom.

But I say to all men, what we have achieved in liberty, we will surpass in greater liberty.

But I tell everyone, what we’ve accomplished in freedom, we will exceed in even greater freedom.

Steadfast in our faith in the Almighty, we will advance toward a world where man's freedom is secure.

Steadfast in our faith in God, we will move toward a world where everyone’s freedom is protected.

To that end we will devote our strength, our resources, and our firmness of resolve. With God's help, the future of mankind will be assured in a world of justice, harmony, and peace.

To that end, we will dedicate our strength, our resources, and our determination. With God's help, the future of humanity will be secured in a world of justice, harmony, and peace.






DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1953

[Transcriber's note: The Republican Party successfully promoted the candidacy of the popular General of the Army in the 1952 election over the Democratic candidate, Adlai Stevenson. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Frederick Vinson on two Bibles—the one used by George Washington at the first inauguration, and the one General Eisenhower received from his mother upon his graduation from the Military Academy at West Point. A large parade followed the ceremony, and inaugural balls were held at the National Armory and Georgetown University's McDonough Hall.]

[Transcriber's note: The Republican Party successfully backed the popular General of the Army in the 1952 election against the Democratic candidate, Adlai Stevenson. Chief Justice Frederick Vinson administered the oath of office using two Bibles—the one George Washington used at his first inauguration and the one General Eisenhower received from his mother when he graduated from the Military Academy at West Point. A big parade took place after the ceremony, and inaugural balls were organized at the National Armory and Georgetown University’s McDonough Hall.]


My friends, before I begin the expression of those thoughts that I deem appropriate to this moment, would you permit me the privilege of uttering a little private prayer of my own. And I ask that you bow your heads:

My friends, before I share the thoughts I think are fitting for this moment, would you allow me the privilege of saying a little private prayer of my own? I ask that you bow your heads:

Almighty God, as we stand here at this moment my future associates in the executive branch of government join me in beseeching that Thou will make full and complete our dedication to the service of the people in this throng, and their fellow citizens everywhere.

Almighty God, as we stand here now, my future colleagues in the executive branch of government join me in asking that You make our commitment to serve the people in this crowd, and their fellow citizens everywhere, whole and complete.

Give us, we pray, the power to discern clearly right from wrong, and allow all our words and actions to be governed thereby, and by the laws of this land. Especially we pray that our concern shall be for all the people regardless of station, race, or calling.

Give us, we ask, the ability to clearly see right from wrong, and let all our words and actions be guided by that, as well as by the laws of this country. Especially we pray that our concern will extend to everyone, regardless of their position, race, or profession.

May cooperation be permitted and be the mutual aim of those who, under the concepts of our Constitution, hold to differing political faiths; so that all may work for the good of our beloved country and Thy glory. Amen.

May cooperation be allowed and be the common goal of those who, under the concepts of our Constitution, adhere to different political beliefs; so that everyone can work for the good of our beloved country and Your glory. Amen.

My fellow citizens:

My fellow citizens:

The world and we have passed the midway point of a century of continuing challenge. We sense with all our faculties that forces of good and evil are massed and armed and opposed as rarely before in history.

The world and we have reached the halfway mark of a century filled with ongoing challenges. We feel deeply that the forces of good and evil are gathered, equipped, and more opposed than ever in history.

This fact defines the meaning of this day. We are summoned by this honored and historic ceremony to witness more than the act of one citizen swearing his oath of service, in the presence of God. We are called as a people to give testimony in the sight of the world to our faith that the future shall belong to the free.

This fact defines the significance of today. We are called to this respected and historic ceremony to witness more than just one person taking an oath of service, in the presence of God. We are gathered as a society to testify to the world about our belief that the future will belong to the free.

Since this century's beginning, a time of tempest has seemed to come upon the continents of the earth. Masses of Asia have awakened to strike off shackles of the past. Great nations of Europe have fought their bloodiest wars. Thrones have toppled and their vast empires have disappeared. New nations have been born.

Since the start of this century, a storm has appeared to sweep across the continents. Countries in Asia have risen up to break free from the past. Major nations in Europe have fought their fiercest wars. Thrones have fallen, and their huge empires have vanished. New nations have emerged.

For our own country, it has been a time of recurring trial. We have grown in power and in responsibility. We have passed through the anxieties of depression and of war to a summit unmatched in man's history. Seeking to secure peace in the world, we have had to fight through the forests of the Argonne, to the shores of Iwo Jima, and to the cold mountains of Korea.

For our country, this has been a time of constant challenges. We have become more powerful and responsible. We have gone through the worries of economic downturns and wars to reach a peak unmatched in human history. In our quest to secure peace in the world, we have had to battle through the forests of the Argonne, to the beaches of Iwo Jima, and to the frigid mountains of Korea.

In the swift rush of great events, we find ourselves groping to know the full sense and meaning of these times in which we live. In our quest of understanding, we beseech God's guidance. We summon all our knowledge of the past and we scan all signs of the future. We bring all our wit and all our will to meet the question:

In the fast pace of major events, we struggle to grasp the full significance and meaning of the times we live in. In our search for understanding, we seek God’s guidance. We call on everything we know from the past and look for signs of the future. We bring all our intelligence and determination to tackle the question:

How far have we come in man's long pilgrimage from darkness toward light? Are we nearing the light—a day of freedom and of peace for all mankind? Or are the shadows of another night closing in upon us?

How far have we come in humanity's long journey from darkness to light? Are we getting closer to the light—a time of freedom and peace for everyone? Or are the shadows of another night closing in on us?

Great as are the preoccupations absorbing us at home, concerned as we are with matters that deeply affect our livelihood today and our vision of the future, each of these domestic problems is dwarfed by, and often even created by, this question that involves all humankind.

As important as the issues we focus on at home are, and despite our concern for things that greatly impact our lives now and our outlook for the future, each of these domestic challenges is overshadowed by, and often even caused by, this question that affects all of humanity.

This trial comes at a moment when man's power to achieve good or to inflict evil surpasses the brightest hopes and the sharpest fears of all ages. We can turn rivers in their courses, level mountains to the plains. Oceans and land and sky are avenues for our colossal commerce. Disease diminishes and life lengthens.

This trial comes at a time when our ability to do good or cause harm is greater than the highest hopes and deepest fears of every generation. We can redirect rivers, flatten mountains, and the oceans, land, and sky serve as pathways for our massive trade. Diseases are decreasing, and life expectancy is increasing.

Yet the promise of this life is imperiled by the very genius that has made it possible. Nations amass wealth. Labor sweats to create—and turns out devices to level not only mountains but also cities. Science seems ready to confer upon us, as its final gift, the power to erase human life from this planet.

Yet the promise of this life is threatened by the very genius that has made it possible. Nations gather wealth. Labor struggles to create—and produces tools to tear down not just mountains but also cities. Science appears ready to give us, as its ultimate gift, the ability to wipe out human life from this planet.

At such a time in history, we who are free must proclaim anew our faith. This faith is the abiding creed of our fathers. It is our faith in the deathless dignity of man, governed by eternal moral and natural laws.

At this point in history, we who are free must reaffirm our belief. This belief is the enduring principle of our ancestors. It is our belief in the lasting dignity of humanity, governed by timeless moral and natural laws.

This faith defines our full view of life. It establishes, beyond debate, those gifts of the Creator that are man's inalienable rights, and that make all men equal in His sight.

This belief shapes our entire perspective on life. It clearly establishes the Creator's gifts that are man's unchangeable rights and ensure that all people are equal in His eyes.

In the light of this equality, we know that the virtues most cherished by free people—love of truth, pride of work, devotion to country—all are treasures equally precious in the lives of the most humble and of the most exalted. The men who mine coal and fire furnaces and balance ledgers and turn lathes and pick cotton and heal the sick and plant corn—all serve as proudly, and as profitably, for America as the statesmen who draft treaties and the legislators who enact laws.

In light of this equality, we understand that the values most valued by free people—love for the truth, pride in work, dedication to country—are equally precious in the lives of both the most humble and the most exalted. The workers who mine coal, run furnaces, manage finances, operate lathes, pick cotton, care for the sick, and plant corn all serve with just as much pride and benefit for America as the statesmen who draft treaties and the legislators who create laws.

This faith rules our whole way of life. It decrees that we, the people, elect leaders not to rule but to serve. It asserts that we have the right to choice of our own work and to the reward of our own toil. It inspires the initiative that makes our productivity the wonder of the world. And it warns that any man who seeks to deny equality among all his brothers betrays the spirit of the free and invites the mockery of the tyrant.

This faith governs our entire way of life. It states that we, the people, elect leaders not to dominate but to serve. It affirms our right to choose our own work and to benefit from our own efforts. It motivates the initiative that makes our productivity truly remarkable. And it cautions that anyone who tries to deny equality among all their fellow humans betrays the spirit of freedom and invites the scorn of tyrants.

It is because we, all of us, hold to these principles that the political changes accomplished this day do not imply turbulence, upheaval or disorder. Rather this change expresses a purpose of strengthening our dedication and devotion to the precepts of our founding documents, a conscious renewal of faith in our country and in the watchfulness of a Divine Providence.

It’s because we all believe in these principles that the political changes happening today don’t mean chaos, disruption, or disorder. Instead, this change reflects our commitment to reinforcing our dedication to the principles in our founding documents, a deliberate renewal of faith in our country and in the guidance of a higher power.

The enemies of this faith know no god but force, no devotion but its use. They tutor men in treason. They feed upon the hunger of others. Whatever defies them, they torture, especially the truth.

The enemies of this faith worship only force and are dedicated solely to using it. They teach people to betray. They thrive on the desperation of others. They torture anything that opposes them, especially the truth.

Here, then, is joined no argument between slightly differing philosophies. This conflict strikes directly at the faith of our fathers and the lives of our sons. No principle or treasure that we hold, from the spiritual knowledge of our free schools and churches to the creative magic of free labor and capital, nothing lies safely beyond the reach of this struggle.

Here, then, there’s no debate between slightly different philosophies. This conflict goes straight to the beliefs of our ancestors and the futures of our children. No principle or treasure we value, from the spiritual teachings of our public schools and churches to the innovative power of free labor and capital, remains secure from this struggle.

Freedom is pitted against slavery; lightness against the dark.

Freedom stands in opposition to slavery; lightness contrasts with darkness.

The faith we hold belongs not to us alone but to the free of all the world. This common bond binds the grower of rice in Burma and the planter of wheat in Iowa, the shepherd in southern Italy and the mountaineer in the Andes. It confers a common dignity upon the French soldier who dies in Indo-China, the British soldier killed in Malaya, the American life given in Korea.

The faith we share doesn’t belong to us alone; it belongs to everyone around the world. This common connection links the rice farmer in Burma and the wheat planter in Iowa, the shepherd in southern Italy and the mountain climber in the Andes. It gives a shared dignity to the French soldier who dies in Indo-China, the British soldier killed in Malaya, and the American who gives their life in Korea.

We know, beyond this, that we are linked to all free peoples not merely by a noble idea but by a simple need. No free people can for long cling to any privilege or enjoy any safety in economic solitude. For all our own material might, even we need markets in the world for the surpluses of our farms and our factories. Equally, we need for these same farms and factories vital materials and products of distant lands. This basic law of interdependence, so manifest in the commerce of peace, applies with thousand-fold intensity in the event of war.

We understand that we are connected to all free nations not just by an admirable principle but by a fundamental necessity. No free nation can hold onto any privilege or find safety in isolation from the economy for long. Despite our own material strength, we also rely on global markets for the excess from our farms and factories. Similarly, we require essential materials and products from faraway places for these same farms and factories. This essential rule of interdependence, clearly seen in peaceful trade, becomes even more critical during wartime.

So we are persuaded by necessity and by belief that the strength of all free peoples lies in unity; their danger, in discord.

So we are convinced by both necessity and belief that the strength of all free people lies in unity, while their danger lies in discord.

To produce this unity, to meet the challenge of our time, destiny has laid upon our country the responsibility of the free world's leadership.

To create this unity and tackle the challenges of our time, destiny has placed the responsibility of leading the free world on our country.

So it is proper that we assure our friends once again that, in the discharge of this responsibility, we Americans know and we observe the difference between world leadership and imperialism; between firmness and truculence; between a thoughtfully calculated goal and spasmodic reaction to the stimulus of emergencies.

So it's important that we reassure our friends once again that, in fulfilling this responsibility, we Americans understand and recognize the difference between global leadership and imperialism; between decisiveness and aggression; between a well-considered objective and a hasty response to urgent situations.

We wish our friends the world over to know this above all: we face the threat—not with dread and confusion—but with confidence and conviction.

We want our friends around the world to know this above all: we face the threat—not with fear and confusion—but with confidence and certainty.

We feel this moral strength because we know that we are not helpless prisoners of history. We are free men. We shall remain free, never to be proven guilty of the one capital offense against freedom, a lack of stanch faith.

We feel this moral strength because we know that we're not powerless victims of history. We are free individuals. We will stay free, never to be found guilty of the one serious crime against freedom, a lack of unwavering faith.

In pleading our just cause before the bar of history and in pressing our labor for world peace, we shall be guided by certain fixed principles.

In presenting our rightful case to history and advocating for global peace, we will be guided by certain core principles.

These principles are:

These principles include:

(1) Abhorring war as a chosen way to balk the purposes of those who threaten us, we hold it to be the first task of statesmanship to develop the strength that will deter the forces of aggression and promote the conditions of peace. For, as it must be the supreme purpose of all free men, so it must be the dedication of their leaders, to save humanity from preying upon itself.

(1) Disapproving of war as a preferred means to resist those who threaten us, we believe that the primary responsibility of leadership is to build the strength that will prevent acts of aggression and encourage peace. For, just as it should be the ultimate goal of all free people, it should also be the commitment of their leaders to protect humanity from turning against itself.

In the light of this principle, we stand ready to engage with any and all others in joint effort to remove the causes of mutual fear and distrust among nations, so as to make possible drastic reduction of armaments. The sole requisites for undertaking such effort are that—in their purpose—they be aimed logically and honestly toward secure peace for all; and that—in their result—they provide methods by which every participating nation will prove good faith in carrying out its pledge.

In light of this principle, we are prepared to work with anyone who wants to help eliminate the sources of mutual fear and distrust between nations, making a significant reduction in weapons possible. The only requirements for this effort are that it must be genuinely focused on securing peace for everyone and that it must produce ways for each participating nation to demonstrate its commitment to fulfilling its promises.

(2) Realizing that common sense and common decency alike dictate the futility of appeasement, we shall never try to placate an aggressor by the false and wicked bargain of trading honor for security. Americans, indeed all free men, remember that in the final choice a soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as a prisoner's chains.

(2) Understanding that both common sense and common decency show the uselessness of appeasement, we will never attempt to appease an aggressor by the dishonest and immoral deal of trading honor for safety. Americans, and indeed all free people, know that in the end, a soldier's load is not as heavy a burden as a prisoner's chains.

(3) Knowing that only a United States that is strong and immensely productive can help defend freedom in our world, we view our Nation's strength and security as a trust upon which rests the hope of free men everywhere. It is the firm duty of each of our free citizens and of every free citizen everywhere to place the cause of his country before the comfort, the convenience of himself.

(3) Understanding that only a strong and highly productive United States can help protect freedom globally, we see our Nation's strength and security as a responsibility that upholds the hope of free people everywhere. It's the unwavering duty of each of our free citizens, and every free citizen around the world, to prioritize the interests of their country over their own comfort and convenience.

(4) Honoring the identity and the special heritage of each nation in the world, we shall never use our strength to try to impress upon another people our own cherished political and economic institutions.

(4) Respecting the identity and unique heritage of every nation in the world, we will never use our power to impose our valued political and economic systems on another people.

(5) Assessing realistically the needs and capacities of proven friends of freedom, we shall strive to help them to achieve their own security and well-being. Likewise, we shall count upon them to assume, within the limits of their resources, their full and just burdens in the common defense of freedom.

(5) By realistically evaluating the needs and abilities of reliable allies of freedom, we will work to support them in achieving their own security and well-being. Similarly, we will rely on them to take on, within their means, their fair share of responsibilities in the joint defense of freedom.

(6) Recognizing economic health as an indispensable basis of military strength and the free world's peace, we shall strive to foster everywhere, and to practice ourselves, policies that encourage productivity and profitable trade. For the impoverishment of any single people in the world means danger to the well-being of all other peoples.

(6) Understanding that a strong economy is essential for military power and the peace of the free world, we will work to promote policies that boost productivity and profitable trade everywhere, and we will practice these policies ourselves. The suffering of any one group of people in the world poses a threat to the well-being of all other groups.

(7) Appreciating that economic need, military security and political wisdom combine to suggest regional groupings of free peoples, we hope, within the framework of the United Nations, to help strengthen such special bonds the world over. The nature of these ties must vary with the different problems of different areas.

(7) Understanding that economic needs, military security, and political insight suggest that free people should form regional groups, we aim, within the framework of the United Nations, to help strengthen these unique connections around the world. The nature of these relationships must adapt to the various challenges faced by different regions.

In the Western Hemisphere, we enthusiastically join with all our neighbors in the work of perfecting a community of fraternal trust and common purpose.

In the Western Hemisphere, we eagerly come together with all our neighbors to build a community based on trust and shared goals.

In Europe, we ask that enlightened and inspired leaders of the Western nations strive with renewed vigor to make the unity of their peoples a reality. Only as free Europe unitedly marshals its strength can it effectively safeguard, even with our help, its spiritual and cultural heritage.

In Europe, we urge that enlightened and inspired leaders of the Western nations work with renewed energy to make the unity of their people a reality. Only when a united free Europe combines its strength can it effectively protect, even with our support, its spiritual and cultural heritage.

(8) Conceiving the defense of freedom, like freedom itself, to be one and indivisible, we hold all continents and peoples in equal regard and honor. We reject any insinuation that one race or another, one people or another, is in any sense inferior or expendable.

(8) We believe that defending freedom, just like freedom itself, is one and indivisible, and we hold all continents and peoples in equal respect and honor. We reject any suggestion that one race or group is inferior or disposable in any way.

(9) Respecting the United Nations as the living sign of all people's hope for peace, we shall strive to make it not merely an eloquent symbol but an effective force. And in our quest for an honorable peace, we shall neither compromise, nor tire, nor ever cease.

(9) Respecting the United Nations as a symbol of everyone's hope for peace, we will work to make it not just a powerful symbol but an effective force. In our pursuit of a just peace, we won't compromise, get tired, or ever give up.

By these rules of conduct, we hope to be known to all peoples.

By following these rules of conduct, we hope to be recognized by everyone.

By their observance, an earth of peace may become not a vision but a fact.

By following these principles, a world of peace can become not just a dream, but a reality.

This hope—this supreme aspiration—must rule the way we live.

This hope—this ultimate goal—should guide how we live.

We must be ready to dare all for our country. For history does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in purpose.

We must be ready to risk everything for our country. History doesn’t entrust freedom to the weak or the scared for long. We need to become skilled in defense and show determination in our goals.

We must be willing, individually and as a Nation, to accept whatever sacrifices may be required of us. A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.

We need to be ready, both as individuals and as a Nation, to accept any sacrifices that might be necessary. A people that prioritizes its privileges over its principles will quickly lose both.

These basic precepts are not lofty abstractions, far removed from matters of daily living. They are laws of spiritual strength that generate and define our material strength. Patriotism means equipped forces and a prepared citizenry. Moral stamina means more energy and more productivity, on the farm and in the factory. Love of liberty means the guarding of every resource that makes freedom possible—from the sanctity of our families and the wealth of our soil to the genius of our scientists.

These basic principles aren't just high-minded ideas that have nothing to do with everyday life. They're the rules of spiritual strength that create and shape our physical strength. Patriotism means having a well-prepared military and an informed citizenry. Moral resilience translates to increased energy and productivity, whether on the farm or in the factory. A love for freedom means protecting every resource that makes it possible—from the sanctity of our families and the richness of our land to the creativity of our scientists.

And so each citizen plays an indispensable role. The productivity of our heads, our hands, and our hearts is the source of all the strength we can command, for both the enrichment of our lives and the winning of the peace.

And so each citizen plays a vital role. The output from our minds, our hands, and our hearts is the source of all the strength we can muster, for both improving our lives and achieving peace.

No person, no home, no community can be beyond the reach of this call. We are summoned to act in wisdom and in conscience, to work with industry, to teach with persuasion, to preach with conviction, to weigh our every deed with care and with compassion. For this truth must be clear before us: whatever America hopes to bring to pass in the world must first come to pass in the heart of America.

No person, no home, no community can escape this call. We are urged to act wisely and morally, to work hard, to teach persuasively, to speak passionately, and to consider every action with care and compassion. This truth must be clear to us: whatever America hopes to achieve in the world must first happen in the heart of America.

The peace we seek, then, is nothing less than the practice and fulfillment of our whole faith among ourselves and in our dealings with others. This signifies more than the stilling of guns, easing the sorrow of war. More than escape from death, it is a way of life. More than a haven for the weary, it is a hope for the brave.

The peace we’re looking for is nothing less than living out our entire faith among ourselves and in how we interact with others. This means more than just stopping the fighting and easing the pain of war. More than just avoiding death, it’s a way of life. More than just a refuge for the tired, it’s a hope for the courageous.

This is the hope that beckons us onward in this century of trial. This is the work that awaits us all, to be done with bravery, with charity, and with prayer to Almighty God.

This is the hope that calls us forward in this challenging century. This is the work that lies ahead for all of us, to be tackled with courage, kindness, and prayers to God.






DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, JANUARY 21, 1957

[Transcriber's note: January 20 occurred on a Sunday, so the President took the oath in the East Room at the White House that morning. The next day he repeated the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Earl Warren administered the oath of office on the President's personal Bible from West Point. Marian Anderson sang at the ceremony at the Capitol. A large parade and four inaugural balls followed the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: January 20 was a Sunday, so the President took the oath in the East Room at the White House that morning. The next day, he repeated the oath of office on the East Portico of the Capitol. Chief Justice Earl Warren administered the oath of office on the President's personal Bible from West Point. Marian Anderson performed at the ceremony at the Capitol. A large parade and four inaugural balls followed the ceremony.]


THE PRICE OF PEACE

COST OF PEACE

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice President, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Speaker, members of my family and friends, my countrymen, and the friends of my country, wherever they may be, we meet again, as upon a like moment four years ago, and again you have witnessed my solemn oath of service to you.

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice President, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Speaker, my family and friends, my fellow citizens, and all the supporters of my country, wherever you are, we gather once more, just like we did four years ago, and once again you have witnessed my serious promise to serve you.

I, too, am a witness, today testifying in your name to the principles and purposes to which we, as a people, are pledged.

I, too, am a witness, today testifying in your name to the principles and purposes to which we, as a people, are committed.

Before all else, we seek, upon our common labor as a nation, the blessings of Almighty God. And the hopes in our hearts fashion the deepest prayers of our whole people.

Before anything else, we seek, through our shared efforts as a nation, the blessings of Almighty God. The hopes in our hearts shape the deepest prayers of all our people.

May we pursue the right—without self-righteousness.

May we seek justice—without being self-righteous.

May we know unity—without conformity.

Let’s embrace unity—without conformity.

May we grow in strength—without pride in self.

May we grow in strength—without being prideful.

May we, in our dealings with all peoples of the earth, ever speak truth and serve justice.

May we always speak the truth and seek justice in our interactions with everyone around the world.

And so shall America—in the sight of all men of good will—prove true to the honorable purposes that bind and rule us as a people in all this time of trial through which we pass.

And so America—seen by all people of good will—will prove true to the honorable intentions that unite and guide us as a nation during this challenging time we are going through.

We live in a land of plenty, but rarely has this earth known such peril as today.

We live in a land of abundance, but few times has this planet faced such danger as today.

In our nation work and wealth abound. Our population grows. Commerce crowds our rivers and rails, our skies, harbors, and highways. Our soil is fertile, our agriculture productive. The air rings with the song of our industry—rolling mills and blast furnaces, dynamos, dams, and assembly lines—the chorus of America the bountiful.

In our country, work and wealth are plentiful. Our population is increasing. Trade fills our rivers, railways, skies, ports, and roadways. Our land is rich, and our farming is efficient. The air vibrates with the sounds of our industry—rolling mills, blast furnaces, generators, dams, and assembly lines—the symphony of America the abundant.

This is our home—yet this is not the whole of our world. For our world is where our full destiny lies—with men, of all people, and all nations, who are or would be free. And for them—and so for us—this is no time of ease or of rest.

This is our home—but it’s not the entirety of our world. Our world encompasses our true destiny, alongside men from every nation, who are or wish to be free. And for them—and therefore for us—this is not a time for comfort or relaxation.

In too much of the earth there is want, discord, danger. New forces and new nations stir and strive across the earth, with power to bring, by their fate, great good or great evil to the free world's future. From the deserts of North Africa to the islands of the South Pacific one third of all mankind has entered upon an historic struggle for a new freedom; freedom from grinding poverty. Across all continents, nearly a billion people seek, sometimes almost in desperation, for the skills and knowledge and assistance by which they may satisfy from their own resources, the material wants common to all mankind.

In many parts of the world, there is poverty, conflict, and danger. New forces and nations are rising up around the globe, with the ability to bring either great benefit or great harm to the future of the free world. From the deserts of North Africa to the islands of the South Pacific, one third of humanity is engaged in a historic struggle for a new freedom; freedom from severe poverty. Across all continents, nearly a billion people are desperately seeking the skills, knowledge, and support they need to meet their basic needs from their own resources.

No nation, however old or great, escapes this tempest of change and turmoil. Some, impoverished by the recent World War, seek to restore their means of livelihood. In the heart of Europe, Germany still stands tragically divided. So is the whole continent divided. And so, too, is all the world.

No country, no matter how old or powerful, can avoid this storm of change and chaos. Some, weakened by the recent World War, are trying to get back on their feet. In the center of Europe, Germany remains painfully split. The entire continent is divided as well. And so is the whole world.

The divisive force is International Communism and the power that it controls.

The divisive force is International Communism and the power it holds.

The designs of that power, dark in purpose, are clear in practice. It strives to seal forever the fate of those it has enslaved. It strives to break the ties that unite the free. And it strives to capture—to exploit for its own greater power—all forces of change in the world, especially the needs of the hungry and the hopes of the oppressed.

The designs of that power, dark in purpose, are clear in practice. It aims to seal the fate of those it has enslaved forever. It seeks to break the bonds that connect the free. And it tries to capture—to exploit for its own greater power—all forces of change in the world, especially the needs of the hungry and the dreams of the oppressed.

Yet the world of International Communism has itself been shaken by a fierce and mighty force: the readiness of men who love freedom to pledge their lives to that love. Through the night of their bondage, the unconquerable will of heroes has struck with the swift, sharp thrust of lightning. Budapest is no longer merely the name of a city; henceforth it is a new and shining symbol of man's yearning to be free.

Yet the world of International Communism has been shaken by a fierce and powerful force: the willingness of people who love freedom to risk their lives for that love. Throughout the darkness of their oppression, the indomitable spirit of heroes has struck with the quick, sharp impact of lightning. Budapest is no longer just the name of a city; from now on, it stands as a new and shining symbol of humanity's desire to be free.

Thus across all the globe there harshly blow the winds of change. And, we—though fortunate be our lot—know that we can never turn our backs to them.

Thus, all around the world, the winds of change are blowing fiercely. And we—though we may be fortunate—know that we can never ignore them.

We look upon this shaken earth, and we declare our firm and fixed purpose—the building of a peace with justice in a world where moral law prevails.

We look at this troubled world, and we declare our strong and unwavering intention—the creation of a just peace in a place where moral values matter.

The building of such a peace is a bold and solemn purpose. To proclaim it is easy. To serve it will be hard. And to attain it, we must be aware of its full meaning—and ready to pay its full price.

The creation of such a peace is a brave and serious goal. It’s easy to announce it. Serving it will be difficult. To actually achieve it, we need to understand its complete meaning—and be prepared to pay the full cost.

We know clearly what we seek, and why.

We clearly know what we want and why.

We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom. And now, as in no other age, we seek it because we have been warned, by the power of modern weapons, that peace may be the only climate possible for human life itself.

We seek peace, recognizing that peace is the environment of freedom. And now, more than ever, we pursue it because we've been reminded, by the strength of modern weapons, that peace might be the only environment suitable for human life itself.

Yet this peace we seek cannot be born of fear alone: it must be rooted in the lives of nations. There must be justice, sensed and shared by all peoples, for, without justice the world can know only a tense and unstable truce. There must be law, steadily invoked and respected by all nations, for without law, the world promises only such meager justice as the pity of the strong upon the weak. But the law of which we speak, comprehending the values of freedom, affirms the equality of all nations, great and small.

Yet the peace we seek can't come from fear alone; it has to be rooted in the lives of nations. There must be justice, felt and shared by everyone, because without justice, the world can only experience a tense and unstable truce. There must be law, consistently upheld and respected by all nations, because without law, the world can only offer the meager justice that comes from the pity of the strong for the weak. But the law we're talking about, which includes the values of freedom, affirms the equality of all nations, big and small.

Splendid as can be the blessings of such a peace, high will be its cost: in toil patiently sustained, in help honorably given, in sacrifice calmly borne.

The blessings of such peace can be amazing, but it will come at a high cost: through hard work endured patiently, through help offered with honor, and through sacrifices faced with calmness.

We are called to meet the price of this peace.

We are called to pay the price for this peace.

To counter the threat of those who seek to rule by force, we must pay the costs of our own needed military strength, and help to build the security of others.

To combat the threat from those who want to dominate through force, we need to invest in our own military strength and assist in building the security of others.

We must use our skills and knowledge and, at times, our substance, to help others rise from misery, however far the scene of suffering may be from our shores. For wherever in the world a people knows desperate want, there must appear at least the spark of hope, the hope of progress—or there will surely rise at last the flames of conflict.

We need to use our skills and knowledge, and sometimes our resources, to help others escape from suffering, no matter how distant their struggles are from us. Because wherever in the world people are in desperate need, there should at least be a glimmer of hope, the hope for progress—or eventually, the fires of conflict will ignite.

We recognize and accept our own deep involvement in the destiny of men everywhere. We are accordingly pledged to honor, and to strive to fortify, the authority of the United Nations. For in that body rests the best hope of our age for the assertion of that law by which all nations may live in dignity.

We acknowledge and accept our significant role in the fate of people everywhere. Therefore, we are committed to upholding and strengthening the authority of the United Nations. For in that organization lies the best hope of our time for the establishment of a law under which all nations can live with dignity.

And, beyond this general resolve, we are called to act a responsible role in the world's great concerns or conflicts—whether they touch upon the affairs of a vast region, the fate of an island in the Pacific, or the use of a canal in the Middle East. Only in respecting the hopes and cultures of others will we practice the equality of all nations. Only as we show willingness and wisdom in giving counsel—in receiving counsel—and in sharing burdens, will we wisely perform the work of peace.

And beyond this general commitment, we are called to play a responsible role in the world's major issues or conflicts—whether they involve the affairs of a large region, the fate of an island in the Pacific, or the use of a canal in the Middle East. Only by respecting the hopes and cultures of others can we practice the equality of all nations. Only when we demonstrate willingness and wisdom in giving advice—in receiving advice—and in sharing responsibilities, will we effectively carry out the work of peace.

For one truth must rule all we think and all we do. No people can live to itself alone. The unity of all who dwell in freedom is their only sure defense. The economic need of all nations—in mutual dependence—makes isolation an impossibility; not even America's prosperity could long survive if other nations did not also prosper. No nation can longer be a fortress, lone and strong and safe. And any people, seeking such shelter for themselves, can now build only their own prison.

For one truth must govern everything we think and do. No group can exist in isolation. The unity of everyone who enjoys freedom is their only real protection. The economic interdependence of all nations makes isolation impossible; even America's success couldn't last if other countries didn't also thrive. No nation can remain a fortress, strong and invulnerable on its own. And any group looking for that kind of safety can only create their own prison.

Our pledge to these principles is constant, because we believe in their rightness.

Our commitment to these principles is unwavering because we believe in their correctness.

We do not fear this world of change. America is no stranger to much of its spirit. Everywhere we see the seeds of the same growth that America itself has known. The American experiment has, for generations, fired the passion and the courage of millions elsewhere seeking freedom, equality, and opportunity. And the American story of material progress has helped excite the longing of all needy peoples for some satisfaction of their human wants. These hopes that we have helped to inspire, we can help to fulfill.

We don’t fear this changing world. America understands much of its essence. Everywhere, we see the beginnings of the same progress that America has experienced. For generations, the American experiment has fueled the passion and bravery of millions around the globe who seek freedom, equality, and opportunity. Additionally, the American narrative of material progress has sparked the desire of all those in need for a chance to meet their basic human needs. We can help turn these hopes we’ve inspired into reality.

In this confidence, we speak plainly to all peoples.

In this confidence, we speak openly to everyone.

We cherish our friendship with all nations that are or would be free. We respect, no less, their independence. And when, in time of want or peril, they ask our help, they may honorably receive it; for we no more seek to buy their sovereignty than we would sell our own. Sovereignty is never bartered among freemen.

We value our friendship with all nations that are or want to be free. We respect their independence just as much. And when they need help in difficult times, they can honorably ask for it; we don’t seek to trade their sovereignty any more than we would sell our own. Sovereignty is never exchanged among free people.

We honor the aspirations of those nations which, now captive, long for freedom. We seek neither their military alliance nor any artificial imitation of our society. And they can know the warmth of the welcome that awaits them when, as must be, they join again the ranks of freedom.

We respect the dreams of those nations that are currently trapped and long for freedom. We don’t want their military alliance or a fake version of our society. They should know that a warm welcome awaits them when they inevitably return to the ranks of the free.

We honor, no less in this divided world than in a less tormented time, the people of Russia. We do not dread, rather do we welcome, their progress in education and industry. We wish them success in their demands for more intellectual freedom, greater security before their own laws, fuller enjoyment of the rewards of their own toil. For as such things come to pass, the more certain will be the coming of that day when our peoples may freely meet in friendship.

We honor, just as much in this divided world as in a less troubled time, the people of Russia. We don't fear them; instead, we welcome their progress in education and industry. We wish them success in their calls for more intellectual freedom, better protection under their own laws, and a greater enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor. Because as these things happen, the arrival of the day when our peoples can meet freely in friendship will be all the more certain.

So we voice our hope and our belief that we can help to heal this divided world. Thus may the nations cease to live in trembling before the menace of force. Thus may the weight of fear and the weight of arms be taken from the burdened shoulders of mankind.

So we express our hope and belief that we can help heal this divided world. May the nations stop living in fear of force. May the burden of fear and the burden of weapons be lifted from the weary shoulders of humanity.

This, nothing less, is the labor to which we are called and our strength dedicated.

This is the work we are meant to do, and we dedicate our strength to it.

And so the prayer of our people carries far beyond our own frontiers, to the wide world of our duty and our destiny.

And so the prayer of our people reaches far beyond our own borders, spanning the vast world of our responsibilities and our future.

May the light of freedom, coming to all darkened lands, flame brightly—until at last the darkness is no more.

May the light of freedom, spreading to all darkened places, shine brightly—until the darkness is gone for good.

May the turbulence of our age yield to a true time of peace, when men and nations shall share a life that honors the dignity of each, the brotherhood of all.

May the chaos of our time give way to a real period of peace, where individuals and nations live together in a way that respects everyone's dignity and the unity of all.






JOHN F. KENNEDY, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 1961

[Transcriber's note: Heavy snow fell the night before the inauguration, but thoughts about cancelling the plans were overruled. The election of 1960 had been close, and the Democratic Senator from Massachusetts was eager to gather support for his agenda. He attended Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Georgetown that morning before joining President Eisenhower to travel to the Capitol. The Congress had extended the East Front, and the inaugural platform spanned the new addition. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Earl Warren. Robert Frost read one of his poems at the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: Heavy snow fell the night before the inauguration, but the idea of canceling the plans was dismissed. The 1960 election had been tight, and the Democratic Senator from Massachusetts was eager to rally support for his agenda. He attended Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Georgetown that morning before joining President Eisenhower to head to the Capitol. Congress had extended the East Front, and the inaugural platform covered the new addition. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Earl Warren. Robert Frost read one of his poems at the ceremony.]


Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom—symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning—signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.

Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, respected clergy, fellow citizens, today we don't celebrate a win for any party, but a celebration of freedom—marking both an end and a new beginning—representing renewal as well as change. I have taken the same solemn oath before you and Almighty God that our forebears established nearly 75 years ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe—the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

The world is really different now. People have the power in their hands to eliminate all kinds of human poverty and all forms of human life. Yet, the same revolutionary beliefs that our ancestors fought for are still relevant worldwide—the belief that human rights don't come from the generosity of the government, but from a higher power.

We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

We must not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let everyone know from this moment and place, to friends and enemies alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, shaped by war, trained by a tough and difficult peace, proud of our long heritage—and unwilling to stand by or allow the gradual erosion of those human rights to which this Nation has always been dedicated, and to which we are dedicated today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

Let every nation know, whether they support us or not, that we will pay any price, take on any burden, face any challenge, support any ally, and stand against any enemy to make sure that liberty survives and thrives.

This much we pledge—and more.

We promise this and more.

To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do—for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.

To our long-standing allies with whom we share cultural and spiritual roots, we promise our loyalty as dedicated friends. Together, there’s not much we can’t achieve through collaboration. When we’re divided, however, there’s very little we can accomplish because we cannot face a strong challenge while being at odds and fractured.

To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom—and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

To the new States we welcome into the community of the free, we promise that one type of colonial control will not be replaced by an even harsher tyranny. We won’t always expect them to agree with us, but we will always hope to see them fiercely supporting their own freedom—and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly tried to gain power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside it.

To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required—not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

To the people living in huts and villages around the world who are fighting to escape widespread hardship, we commit to doing our utmost to support them in their efforts, for as long as it takes—not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we want their votes, but because it’s the right thing to do. If a free society can’t help the many who are poor, it can’t save the few who are wealthy.

To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge—to convert our good words into good deeds—in a new alliance for progress—to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.

To our sister countries to the south, we make a special promise—to turn our good intentions into real actions—in a new partnership for progress—to help free people and governments break free from the grips of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope can't fall victim to hostile forces. Let all our neighbors understand that we will stand together to fight against aggression or interference anywhere in the Americas. And let every other nation know that this Hemisphere plans to remain in control of its own affairs.

To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support—to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective—to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak—and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

To that global gathering of independent nations, the United Nations, our last best hope in a time when the tools of war have greatly surpassed the tools of peace, we reaffirm our commitment to support it—to stop it from becoming just a platform for criticism—to bolster its defense of the new and the vulnerable—and to expand the reach of its authority.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

Finally, to those nations that would choose to be our enemies, we offer not a promise but a request: that both sides start fresh in the pursuit of peace, before the dark forces of destruction unleashed by science consume all of humanity in deliberate or unintentional self-destruction.

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

We shouldn't show any weakness. Because only when our strength is clearly sufficient can we be sure that it will never be needed.

But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course—both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.

But neither can two major and powerful groups of nations feel reassured by our current path—both sides weighed down by the expense of modern weapons, both justifiably worried about the ongoing spread of nuclear weapons, yet both racing to shift that fragile balance of fear that prevents humanity's ultimate war.

So let us begin anew—remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.

So let's start fresh—keeping in mind that politeness isn't a sign of weakness, and honesty always needs to be proven. Let's never negotiate out of fear. But let's never be afraid to negotiate.

Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us.

Let both sides look for the issues that bring us together instead of focusing on the problems that separate us.

Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms—and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

Let both sides, for the first time, come up with serious and specific proposals for inspecting and controlling arms—and put the total power to destroy other nations under the complete control of all nations.

Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.

Let both sides try to harness the wonders of science instead of its fears. Together, let’s explore the stars, conquer deserts, eliminate disease, dive into the ocean depths, and promote the arts and commerce.

Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth the command of Isaiah—to "undo the heavy burdens...and to let the oppressed go free."

Let everyone come together and listen to Isaiah's command from every corner of the Earth—to "remove heavy burdens...and set the oppressed free."

And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved.

And if a foundation of cooperation can push back the jungle of mistrust, let both sides come together to create a new effort, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are fair and the weak are safe, and peace is maintained.

All this will not be finished in the first 100 days. Nor will it be finished in the first 1,000 days, nor in the life of this Administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.

All this won’t be done in the first 100 days. It won’t be done in the first 1,000 days, nor in the lifetime of this Administration, nor maybe even in our lifetime on this planet. But let’s get started.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than in mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than in mine, lies the ultimate success or failure of our path. Since this country was established, every generation of Americans has been called to show its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to serve are scattered around the world.

Now the trumpet summons us again—not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are—but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation"—a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.

Now the trumpet calls us again—not to take up arms, though we need arms; not to fight, though we are in a fight—but to carry the weight of a long twilight struggle, year after year, "rejoicing in hope, patient in hardship"—a struggle against the common enemies of humanity: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.

Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?

Can we create a large and worldwide alliance against these enemies, bringing together the North and South, East and West, to ensure a better life for everyone? Will you be part of that important effort?

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility—I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been given the responsibility of defending freedom at its most critical time. I don’t shy away from this duty—I embrace it. I don’t think any of us would want to trade places with anyone else or any other generation. The energy, the faith, and the dedication we bring to this effort will illuminate our country and everyone who serves it—and the light from that fire can genuinely brighten the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

And so, my fellow Americans: don't ask what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

My fellow citizens of the world: don’t ask what America can do for you, but what we can do together for the freedom of humanity.

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.

Finally, whether you're citizens of America or citizens of the world, expect from us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice that we expect from you. With a clear conscience as our only sure reward, and history as the final judge of our actions, let’s move forward to lead the land we love, seeking His blessing and help, but understanding that here on earth, God's work must truly be our own.






LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1965

[Transcriber's note: President Johnson had first taken the oath of office on board Air Force One on November 22, 1963, the day President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. The election of 1964 was a landslide victory for the Democratic Party. Mrs. Johnson joined the President on the platform on the East Front of the Capitol; she was the first wife to stand with her husband as he took the oath of office. The oath was administered by Chief Justice Earl Warren. Leontyne Price sang at the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: President Johnson first took the oath of office on Air Force One on November 22, 1963, the day President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. The 1964 election was a massive win for the Democratic Party. Mrs. Johnson stood with the President on the East Front of the Capitol; she was the first spouse to stand with her husband as he took the oath. Chief Justice Earl Warren administered the oath. Leontyne Price performed at the ceremony.]


My fellow countrymen, on this occasion, the oath I have taken before you and before God is not mine alone, but ours together. We are one nation and one people. Our fate as a nation and our future as a people rest not upon one citizen, but upon all citizens.

My fellow countrymen, today, the oath I’ve taken in front of you and God isn’t just mine; it’s ours together. We are one nation and one people. Our destiny as a nation and our future as a people don’t rely on one person, but on all of us.

This is the majesty and the meaning of this moment.

This is the greatness and significance of this moment.

For every generation, there is a destiny. For some, history decides. For this generation, the choice must be our own.

For every generation, there's a destiny. For some, history makes the call. For this generation, we have to make our own choices.

Even now, a rocket moves toward Mars. It reminds us that the world will not be the same for our children, or even for ourselves in a short span of years. The next man to stand here will look out on a scene different from our own, because ours is a time of change—rapid and fantastic change bearing the secrets of nature, multiplying the nations, placing in uncertain hands new weapons for mastery and destruction, shaking old values, and uprooting old ways.

Even now, a rocket is heading toward Mars. It reminds us that the world won’t be the same for our kids, or even for us in just a few years. The next person to stand here will look out at a scene that's different from ours because we’re living in a time of change—fast and incredible change that reveals the secrets of nature, increases the number of nations, puts new weapons for control and destruction in uncertain hands, shakes old values, and uproots traditional ways.

Our destiny in the midst of change will rest on the unchanged character of our people, and on their faith.

Our future during times of change will depend on the unchanging nature of our people and their faith.

THE AMERICAN COVENANT

The American Covenant

They came here—the exile and the stranger, brave but frightened—to find a place where a man could be his own man. They made a covenant with this land. Conceived in justice, written in liberty, bound in union, it was meant one day to inspire the hopes of all mankind; and it binds us still. If we keep its terms, we shall flourish.

They came here—the outcast and the newcomer, courageous but scared—to find a place where a person could be himself. They made a promise to this land. Created in fairness, written in freedom, united in purpose, it was intended to one day inspire the dreams of all people; and it still holds us together. If we uphold its principles, we will thrive.

JUSTICE AND CHANGE

Justice and Change

First, justice was the promise that all who made the journey would share in the fruits of the land.

First, justice meant that everyone who made the journey would benefit from the resources of the land.

In a land of great wealth, families must not live in hopeless poverty. In a land rich in harvest, children just must not go hungry. In a land of healing miracles, neighbors must not suffer and die unattended. In a great land of learning and scholars, young people must be taught to read and write.

In a country of great wealth, families shouldn’t live in hopeless poverty. In a land abundant in harvests, children shouldn’t go hungry. In a place of healing miracles, neighbors shouldn’t suffer and die alone. In a great land of education and scholars, young people need to be taught how to read and write.

For the more than 30 years that I have served this Nation, I have believed that this injustice to our people, this waste of our resources, was our real enemy. For 30 years or more, with the resources I have had, I have vigilantly fought against it. I have learned, and I know, that it will not surrender easily.

For over 30 years that I've served this country, I've believed that this injustice to our people and the waste of our resources were our true enemies. For more than 30 years, with the resources I've had, I've fought hard against it. I've learned, and I know, it won't give up easily.

But change has given us new weapons. Before this generation of Americans is finished, this enemy will not only retreat—it will be conquered.

But change has given us new tools. By the time this generation of Americans is done, this enemy will not only retreat—it will be defeated.

Justice requires us to remember that when any citizen denies his fellow, saying, "His color is not mine," or "His beliefs are strange and different," in that moment he betrays America, though his forebears created this Nation.

Justice requires us to remember that when any citizen denies another, saying, "His skin color isn't like mine," or "His beliefs are weird and different," in that moment, he betrays America, even though his ancestors built this nation.

LIBERTY AND CHANGE

Freedom and Transformation

Liberty was the second article of our covenant. It was self-government. It was our Bill of Rights. But it was more. America would be a place where each man could be proud to be himself: stretching his talents, rejoicing in his work, important in the life of his neighbors and his nation.

Liberty was the second part of our agreement. It meant self-government. It was our Bill of Rights. But it was more than that. America would be a place where everyone could take pride in being themselves: developing their skills, finding joy in their work, and playing an important role in the lives of their neighbors and their country.

This has become more difficult in a world where change and growth seem to tower beyond the control and even the judgment of men. We must work to provide the knowledge and the surroundings which can enlarge the possibilities of every citizen.

This has become more challenging in a world where change and growth appear to surpass the control and even the judgment of people. We need to strive to provide the knowledge and the environment that can expand the possibilities for every citizen.

The American covenant called on us to help show the way for the liberation of man. And that is today our goal. Thus, if as a nation there is much outside our control, as a people no stranger is outside our hope.

The American promise asks us to help lead the way in freeing humanity. And that is our goal today. So, while there may be much beyond our control as a nation, no one is beyond our hope as a community.

Change has brought new meaning to that old mission. We can never again stand aside, prideful in isolation. Terrific dangers and troubles that we once called "foreign" now constantly live among us. If American lives must end, and American treasure be spilled, in countries we barely know, that is the price that change has demanded of conviction and of our enduring covenant.

Change has given a new meaning to that old mission. We can no longer stand by, proud in our isolation. The huge dangers and problems we once viewed as "foreign" now live among us all the time. If American lives must be lost, and American resources wasted, in countries we barely understand, that's the cost that change has required of our beliefs and our ongoing commitment.

Think of our world as it looks from the rocket that is heading toward Mars. It is like a child's globe, hanging in space, the continents stuck to its side like colored maps. We are all fellow passengers on a dot of earth. And each of us, in the span of time, has really only a moment among our companions.

Think of our world as it appears from the rocket traveling to Mars. It looks like a kid’s globe floating in space, with the continents glued to its surface like colorful maps. We’re all fellow travelers on this tiny planet. And each of us, over time, only has a brief moment with our companions.

How incredible it is that in this fragile existence, we should hate and destroy one another. There are possibilities enough for all who will abandon mastery over others to pursue mastery over nature. There is world enough for all to seek their happiness in their own way.

How amazing it is that in this fragile life, we should hate and destroy each other. There are plenty of opportunities for everyone who is willing to give up controlling others to focus on mastering nature. There’s enough space for all to find their happiness in their own way.

Our Nation's course is abundantly clear. We aspire to nothing that belongs to others. We seek no dominion over our fellow man, but man's dominion over tyranny and misery.

Our nation's path is very clear. We don't want anything that belongs to others. We don't seek control over our fellow humans, but rather their control over tyranny and suffering.

But more is required. Men want to be a part of a common enterprise—a cause greater than themselves. Each of us must find a way to advance the purpose of the Nation, thus finding new purpose for ourselves. Without this, we shall become a nation of strangers.

But more is needed. People want to be part of a shared mission—a cause that's bigger than themselves. Each of us has to find a way to further the goals of the Nation, and in doing so, discover new meaning for our own lives. Without this, we will turn into a nation of strangers.

UNION AND CHANGE

Teamwork and Transformation

The third article was union. To those who were small and few against the wilderness, the success of liberty demanded the strength of union. Two centuries of change have made this true again.

The third article was unity. For those who were outnumbered and struggling against the wilderness, achieving freedom required the strength of unity. Two hundred years of change have made this true once more.

No longer need capitalist and worker, farmer and clerk, city and countryside, struggle to divide our bounty. By working shoulder to shoulder, together we can increase the bounty of all. We have discovered that every child who learns, every man who finds work, every sick body that is made whole—like a candle added to an altar—brightens the hope of all the faithful.

No longer do capitalists and workers, farmers and clerks, city dwellers and those from the countryside need to fight over our resources. By working together, we can boost the resources available to everyone. We’ve realized that every child who learns, every person who finds a job, and every sick person who gets better—like adding a candle to an altar—brightens the hope for all of us.

So let us reject any among us who seek to reopen old wounds and to rekindle old hatreds. They stand in the way of a seeking nation.

So let’s dismiss anyone among us who wants to reopen past wounds and reignite old grudges. They are obstructing the progress of our nation.

Let us now join reason to faith and action to experience, to transform our unity of interest into a unity of purpose. For the hour and the day and the time are here to achieve progress without strife, to achieve change without hatred—not without difference of opinion, but without the deep and abiding divisions which scar the union for generations.

Let’s now combine reason with faith and action with experience, to turn our shared interests into a common purpose. The moment is here to make progress without conflict, to bring about change without hatred—not without differing opinions, but without the deep and lasting divisions that have scarred our union for generations.

THE AMERICAN BELIEF

THE AMERICAN DREAM

Under this covenant of justice, liberty, and union we have become a nation—prosperous, great, and mighty. And we have kept our freedom. But we have no promise from God that our greatness will endure. We have been allowed by Him to seek greatness with the sweat of our hands and the strength of our spirit.

Under this agreement of fairness, freedom, and unity, we've become a nation—successful, significant, and powerful. And we have maintained our freedom. However, we have no guarantee from God that our greatness will last. He has permitted us to pursue greatness through our hard work and determination.

I do not believe that the Great Society is the ordered, changeless, and sterile battalion of the ants. It is the excitement of becoming—always becoming, trying, probing, falling, resting, and trying again—but always trying and always gaining.

I don’t think the Great Society is a rigid, unchanging, and lifeless army of ants. It’s all about the thrill of evolving—constantly evolving, experimenting, exploring, stumbling, resting, and then trying again—always striving and always making progress.

In each generation, with toil and tears, we have had to earn our heritage again.

In every generation, through hard work and struggle, we have had to earn our legacy once more.

If we fail now, we shall have forgotten in abundance what we learned in hardship: that democracy rests on faith, that freedom asks more than it gives, and that the judgment of God is harshest on those who are most favored.

If we mess up now, we’ll have completely forgotten what we learned during tough times: that democracy relies on trust, that freedom demands more than it offers, and that God’s judgment is toughest on those who have the most advantages.

If we succeed, it will not be because of what we have, but it will be because of what we are; not because of what we own, but, rather because of what we believe.

If we succeed, it won't be because of what we have, but because of who we are; not because of what we own, but rather because of what we believe.

For we are a nation of believers. Underneath the clamor of building and the rush of our day's pursuits, we are believers in justice and liberty and union, and in our own Union. We believe that every man must someday be free. And we believe in ourselves.

For we are a nation of believers. Beneath the noise of construction and the hustle of our daily lives, we believe in justice, freedom, unity, and in our own Union. We believe that every person must eventually be free. And we believe in ourselves.

Our enemies have always made the same mistake. In my lifetime—in depression and in war—they have awaited our defeat. Each time, from the secret places of the American heart, came forth the faith they could not see or that they could not even imagine. It brought us victory. And it will again.

Our enemies have always made the same mistake. In my lifetime—during tough times and in war—they have waited for our defeat. Each time, from the hidden depths of the American spirit, came the faith they couldn’t see or even imagine. It brought us victory. And it will again.

For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest sleeping in the unplowed ground. Is our world gone? We say "Farewell." Is a new world coming? We welcome it—and we will bend it to the hopes of man.

For this is what America is all about. It is the untouched desert and the unscaled mountain. It is the star that remains out of reach and the harvest lying dormant in the unplowed soil. Has our world vanished? We say "Goodbye." Is a new world on the way? We embrace it—and we will shape it to fulfill humanity's dreams.

To these trusted public servants and to my family and those close friends of mine who have followed me down a long, winding road, and to all the people of this Union and the world, I will repeat today what I said on that sorrowful day in November 1963: "I will lead and I will do the best I can."

To these trusted public servants, my family, and my close friends who have stood by me through a long and winding journey, and to everyone in this country and around the world, I’ll restate what I said on that tragic day in November 1963: "I will lead and I will do my best."

But you must look within your own hearts to the old promises and to the old dream. They will lead you best of all.

But you need to look inside your own hearts to the old promises and the old dream. They will guide you better than anything else.

For myself, I ask only, in the words of an ancient leader: "Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great?"

For my part, I only request, in the words of a long-ago leader: "Give me wisdom and knowledge, so I can lead this people: for who is able to judge such a great people?"






RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, JANUARY 20, 1969

[Transcriber's note: An almost-winner of the 1960 election, and a close winner of the 1968 election, the former Vice President and California Senator and Congressman had defeated the Democratic Vice President, Hubert Humphrey, and the American Independent Party candidate, George Wallace. Chief Justice Earl Warren administered the oath of office for the fifth time. The President addressed the large crowd from a pavilion on the East Front of the Capitol. The address was televised by satellite around the world.]

[Transcriber's note: An almost-winner of the 1960 election and a narrow winner of the 1968 election, the former Vice President and California Senator and Congressman defeated Democratic Vice President Hubert Humphrey and American Independent Party candidate George Wallace. Chief Justice Earl Warren administered the oath of office for the fifth time. The President spoke to the large crowd from a pavilion on the East Front of the Capitol. The address was televised by satellite around the world.]


Senator Dirksen, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. Vice President, President Johnson, Vice President Humphrey, my fellow Americans—and my fellow citizens of the world community:

Senator Dirksen, Chief Justice, Vice President, President Johnson, Vice President Humphrey, my fellow Americans—and my fellow global citizens:

I ask you to share with me today the majesty of this moment. In the orderly transfer of power, we celebrate the unity that keeps us free.

I ask you to share with me today the greatness of this moment. In the smooth transfer of power, we celebrate the unity that keeps us free.

Each moment in history is a fleeting time, precious and unique. But some stand out as moments of beginning, in which courses are set that shape decades or centuries.

Each moment in history is a brief, precious, and unique time. But some moments stand out as beginnings, setting paths that shape decades or even centuries.

This can be such a moment.

This can be such a moment.

Forces now are converging that make possible, for the first time, the hope that many of man's deepest aspirations can at last be realized. The spiraling pace of change allows us to contemplate, within our own lifetime, advances that once would have taken centuries.

Forces are now coming together that make it possible, for the first time, to hope that many of humanity's deepest desires can finally be fulfilled. The rapid pace of change lets us consider, within our own lifetime, advancements that once would have taken centuries.

In throwing wide the horizons of space, we have discovered new horizons on earth.

By expanding our understanding of space, we've uncovered new possibilities here on Earth.

For the first time, because the people of the world want peace, and the leaders of the world are afraid of war, the times are on the side of peace.

For the first time, because the people of the world want peace, and the leaders of the world are afraid of war, the times are in favor of peace.

Eight years from now America will celebrate its 200th anniversary as a nation. Within the lifetime of most people now living, mankind will celebrate that great new year which comes only once in a thousand years—the beginning of the third millennium.

In eight years, America will mark its 200th anniversary as a nation. During the lifetime of most people alive today, humanity will celebrate that amazing new year that only happens once every thousand years—the start of the third millennium.

What kind of nation we will be, what kind of world we will live in, whether we shape the future in the image of our hopes, is ours to determine by our actions and our choices.

What kind of nation we will become, what kind of world we will live in, whether we create the future based on our hopes, is up to us to decide through our actions and choices.

The greatest honor history can bestow is the title of peacemaker. This honor now beckons America—the chance to help lead the world at last out of the valley of turmoil, and onto that high ground of peace that man has dreamed of since the dawn of civilization.

The greatest honor history can give is the title of peacemaker. This honor now calls to America—the opportunity to help lead the world finally out of the valley of chaos, and onto that high ground of peace that humanity has dreamed of since the beginning of civilization.

If we succeed, generations to come will say of us now living that we mastered our moment, that we helped make the world safe for mankind.

If we succeed, future generations will say of us who are living today that we seized our opportunity and made the world a safer place for humanity.

This is our summons to greatness.

This is our call to greatness.

I believe the American people are ready to answer this call.

I believe the American people are ready to take action on this.

The second third of this century has been a time of proud achievement. We have made enormous strides in science and industry and agriculture. We have shared our wealth more broadly than ever. We have learned at last to manage a modern economy to assure its continued growth.

The second third of this century has been a time of great achievement. We have made huge progress in science, industry, and agriculture. We have shared our wealth more widely than ever before. We have finally learned how to manage a modern economy to ensure its ongoing growth.

We have given freedom new reach, and we have begun to make its promise real for black as well as for white.

We have expanded the concept of freedom, and we have started to make its promise a reality for both Black and white people.

We see the hope of tomorrow in the youth of today. I know America's youth. I believe in them. We can be proud that they are better educated, more committed, more passionately driven by conscience than any generation in our history.

We see the hope for the future in today's youth. I have faith in America's young people. We can take pride in the fact that they are better educated, more dedicated, and more passionately driven by their beliefs than any generation before them.

No people has ever been so close to the achievement of a just and abundant society, or so possessed of the will to achieve it. Because our strengths are so great, we can afford to appraise our weaknesses with candor and to approach them with hope.

No group of people has ever been closer to creating a fair and prosperous society, or been so motivated to do so. Because our strengths are so significant, we can honestly evaluate our weaknesses and tackle them with optimism.

Standing in this same place a third of a century ago, Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed a Nation ravaged by depression and gripped in fear. He could say in surveying the Nation's troubles: "They concern, thank God, only material things."

Standing in this same place thirty years ago, Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed a nation devastated by the Great Depression and filled with fear. He could say while looking at the country's problems: "Thank God, they only involve material things."

Our crisis today is the reverse.

Our crisis today is exactly the opposite.

We have found ourselves rich in goods, but ragged in spirit; reaching with magnificent precision for the moon, but falling into raucous discord on earth.

We have become wealthy in possessions, but poor in spirit; aiming with incredible accuracy for the moon, yet ending up in loud conflict here on earth.

We are caught in war, wanting peace. We are torn by division, wanting unity. We see around us empty lives, wanting fulfillment. We see tasks that need doing, waiting for hands to do them.

We are caught in war, craving peace. We are divided, longing for unity. We see empty lives around us, seeking fulfillment. We see tasks that need to be done, waiting for someone to take action.

To a crisis of the spirit, we need an answer of the spirit.

To a crisis of the spirit, we need a response of the spirit.

To find that answer, we need only look within ourselves.

To find that answer, we just need to look inside ourselves.

When we listen to "the better angels of our nature," we find that they celebrate the simple things, the basic things—such as goodness, decency, love, kindness.

When we pay attention to "the better angels of our nature," we discover that they celebrate the simple things, the fundamental things—like goodness, decency, love, and kindness.

Greatness comes in simple trappings.

Greatness comes in simple forms.

The simple things are the ones most needed today if we are to surmount what divides us, and cement what unites us.

The simple things are what we need most today if we're going to overcome what separates us and strengthen what brings us together.

To lower our voices would be a simple thing.

To lower our voices would be easy.

In these difficult years, America has suffered from a fever of words; from inflated rhetoric that promises more than it can deliver; from angry rhetoric that fans discontents into hatreds; from bombastic rhetoric that postures instead of persuading.

In these tough times, America has been overwhelmed by an outburst of words; from exaggerated statements that promise more than they can actually provide; from angry language that turns frustrations into hatred; from flashy rhetoric that shows off instead of convincing.

We cannot learn from one another until we stop shouting at one another—until we speak quietly enough so that our words can be heard as well as our voices.

We can't learn from each other until we stop yelling at each other—until we talk quietly enough for our words to be heard along with our voices.

For its part, government will listen. We will strive to listen in new ways—to the voices of quiet anguish, the voices that speak without words, the voices of the heart—to the injured voices, the anxious voices, the voices that have despaired of being heard.

For its part, the government will listen. We will work to listen in new ways—to the voices of silent pain, the voices that communicate without words, the voices from the heart—to the hurt voices, the worried voices, the voices that have given up on being heard.

Those who have been left out, we will try to bring in.

Those who have been excluded, we will try to include.

Those left behind, we will help to catch up.

Those who were left behind, we'll help them catch up.

For all of our people, we will set as our goal the decent order that makes progress possible and our lives secure.

For everyone in our community, we will aim for a fair system that allows for progress and keeps our lives safe.

As we reach toward our hopes, our task is to build on what has gone before—not turning away from the old, but turning toward the new.

As we strive for our dreams, our job is to build on what has come before—not ignoring the past, but embracing the future.

In this past third of a century, government has passed more laws, spent more money, initiated more programs, than in all our previous history.

In the last thirty years, the government has enacted more laws, spent more money, and launched more programs than in all of our previous history combined.

In pursuing our goals of full employment, better housing, excellence in education; in rebuilding our cities and improving our rural areas; in protecting our environment and enhancing the quality of life—in all these and more, we will and must press urgently forward.

In working towards our goals of full employment, better housing, quality education; in rebuilding our cities and improving our rural areas; in protecting our environment and enhancing our quality of life—in all these areas and more, we will and must push forward with urgency.

We shall plan now for the day when our wealth can be transferred from the destruction of war abroad to the urgent needs of our people at home.

We should start planning for the day when we can redirect our resources from the devastation of war overseas to the pressing needs of our citizens here at home.

The American dream does not come to those who fall asleep.

The American dream doesn't come to those who are inactive.

But we are approaching the limits of what government alone can do.

But we are getting close to the limits of what the government can do by itself.

Our greatest need now is to reach beyond government, and to enlist the legions of the concerned and the committed.

Our biggest need right now is to look beyond government and to bring together the many people who are caring and dedicated.

What has to be done, has to be done by government and people together or it will not be done at all. The lesson of past agony is that without the people we can do nothing; with the people we can do everything.

What needs to be done has to be done by the government and the people together, or it won't get done at all. The lesson from past struggles is that without the people, we can accomplish nothing; with the people, we can achieve anything.

To match the magnitude of our tasks, we need the energies of our people—enlisted not only in grand enterprises, but more importantly in those small, splendid efforts that make headlines in the neighborhood newspaper instead of the national journal.

To meet the scale of our tasks, we need the commitment of our people—engaged not just in big projects, but more importantly in those small, wonderful efforts that make headlines in the local newspaper instead of the national one.

With these, we can build a great cathedral of the spirit—each of us raising it one stone at a time, as he reaches out to his neighbor, helping, caring, doing.

With these, we can build a wonderful cathedral of the spirit—each of us contributing one stone at a time, as we reach out to our neighbors, helping, caring, and doing.

I do not offer a life of uninspiring ease. I do not call for a life of grim sacrifice. I ask you to join in a high adventure—one as rich as humanity itself, and as exciting as the times we live in.

I’m not offering a life of dull comfort. I’m not calling for a life of harsh sacrifice. I’m asking you to be a part of an amazing adventure—one as rich as humanity itself and as thrilling as the times we live in.

The essence of freedom is that each of us shares in the shaping of his own destiny.

The essence of freedom is that each of us has a role in shaping our own destiny.

Until he has been part of a cause larger than himself, no man is truly whole.

Until a man has been involved in something bigger than himself, he isn't really complete.

The way to fulfillment is in the use of our talents; we achieve nobility in the spirit that inspires that use.

The path to fulfillment lies in using our talents; we gain greatness through the spirit that motivates this use.

As we measure what can be done, we shall promise only what we know we can produce, but as we chart our goals we shall be lifted by our dreams.

As we assess what we can accomplish, we'll only commit to what we know we can deliver, but as we outline our goals, we'll be inspired by our dreams.

No man can be fully free while his neighbor is not. To go forward at all is to go forward together.

No one can be truly free if their neighbor isn't. Moving forward means moving forward together.

This means black and white together, as one nation, not two. The laws have caught up with our conscience. What remains is to give life to what is in the law: to ensure at last that as all are born equal in dignity before God, all are born equal in dignity before man.

This means black and white together, as one nation, not two. The laws have caught up with our conscience. What remains is to bring to life what is in the law: to finally ensure that as all are born equal in dignity before God, all are born equal in dignity before people.

As we learn to go forward together at home, let us also seek to go forward together with all mankind.

As we learn to move ahead together at home, let’s also strive to move ahead together with all humanity.

Let us take as our goal: where peace is unknown, make it welcome; where peace is fragile, make it strong; where peace is temporary, make it permanent.

Let’s aim for this: where peace doesn’t exist, bring it in; where peace is weak, strengthen it; where peace is short-lived, make it lasting.

After a period of confrontation, we are entering an era of negotiation.

After a time of conflict, we're moving into a time of negotiation.

Let all nations know that during this administration our lines of communication will be open.

Let all nations know that during this administration, our communication lines will be open.

We seek an open world—open to ideas, open to the exchange of goods and people—a world in which no people, great or small, will live in angry isolation.

We want a world that’s open—open to ideas, open to the exchange of goods and people—a world where no one, whether great or small, lives in angry isolation.

We cannot expect to make everyone our friend, but we can try to make no one our enemy.

We can't expect to befriend everyone, but we can aim to have no enemies.

Those who would be our adversaries, we invite to a peaceful competition—not in conquering territory or extending dominion, but in enriching the life of man.

Those who would be our opponents, we invite to a peaceful competition—not in taking over land or gaining power, but in enhancing human life.

As we explore the reaches of space, let us go to the new worlds together—not as new worlds to be conquered, but as a new adventure to be shared.

As we explore the vastness of space, let’s journey to the new worlds together—not as places to conquer, but as a new adventure to experience together.

With those who are willing to join, let us cooperate to reduce the burden of arms, to strengthen the structure of peace, to lift up the poor and the hungry.

With those who want to join, let's work together to lessen the burden of weapons, to reinforce the framework of peace, and to uplift the poor and the hungry.

But to all those who would be tempted by weakness, let us leave no doubt that we will be as strong as we need to be for as long as we need to be.

But to anyone who might be tempted by weakness, let’s make it clear that we will be as strong as we need to be for as long as it takes.

Over the past twenty years, since I first came to this Capital as a freshman Congressman, I have visited most of the nations of the world.

Over the past twenty years, since I first arrived at this Capital as a freshman Congressman, I have traveled to most countries around the globe.

I have come to know the leaders of the world, and the great forces, the hatreds, the fears that divide the world.

I have come to understand the leaders of the world and the powerful forces, the hatreds, and the fears that separate us.

I know that peace does not come through wishing for it—that there is no substitute for days and even years of patient and prolonged diplomacy.

I know that peace doesn't just happen by wishing for it—that there's no replacement for days or even years of patient and persistent diplomacy.

I also know the people of the world.

I also know the people in the world.

I have seen the hunger of a homeless child, the pain of a man wounded in battle, the grief of a mother who has lost her son. I know these have no ideology, no race.

I have witnessed the hunger of a homeless child, the pain of a man injured in battle, the sorrow of a mother mourning her son. I understand that these experiences have no ideology and no race.

I know America. I know the heart of America is good.

I know America. I know that the heart of America is good.

I speak from my own heart, and the heart of my country, the deep concern we have for those who suffer, and those who sorrow.

I speak from my own heart and from the heart of my country, the deep concern we have for those who suffer and those who grieve.

I have taken an oath today in the presence of God and my countrymen to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. To that oath I now add this sacred commitment: I shall consecrate my office, my energies, and all the wisdom I can summon, to the cause of peace among nations.

I have taken an oath today in front of God and my fellow citizens to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. To that oath, I now add this sacred commitment: I will dedicate my office, my efforts, and all the wisdom I can gather to the cause of peace among nations.

Let this message be heard by strong and weak alike:

Let this message be heard by everyone, regardless of strength or weakness:

The peace we seek to win is not victory over any other people, but the peace that comes "with healing in its wings"; with compassion for those who have suffered; with understanding for those who have opposed us; with the opportunity for all the peoples of this earth to choose their own destiny.

The peace we aim for isn't about defeating anyone else, but rather the kind of peace that brings "healing in its wings"; a peace rooted in compassion for those who have endured pain; in understanding for those who have stood against us; and in the chance for all the people on this planet to decide their own fate.

Only a few short weeks ago, we shared the glory of man's first sight of the world as God sees it, as a single sphere reflecting light in the darkness.

Only a few short weeks ago, we shared the awe of humanity's first view of the world as God sees it, as a single globe shining in the darkness.

As the Apollo astronauts flew over the moon's gray surface on Christmas Eve, they spoke to us of the beauty of earth—and in that voice so clear across the lunar distance, we heard them invoke God's blessing on its goodness.

As the Apollo astronauts flew over the moon's gray surface on Christmas Eve, they talked to us about the beauty of Earth—and in that clear voice across the distance to the moon, we heard them ask for God's blessing on its goodness.

In that moment, their view from the moon moved poet Archibald MacLeish to write:

In that moment, their perspective from the moon inspired poet Archibald MacLeish to write:

"To see the earth as it truly is, small and blue and beautiful in that eternal silence where it floats, is to see ourselves as riders on the earth together, brothers on that bright loveliness in the eternal cold—brothers who know now they are truly brothers."

"Seeing the earth for what it really is, small, blue, and beautiful in the endless silence of space, is to recognize ourselves as passengers on this planet together, like brothers surrounded by that bright beauty in the eternal cold—brothers who now understand they are genuinely connected."

In that moment of surpassing technological triumph, men turned their thoughts toward home and humanity—seeing in that far perspective that man's destiny on earth is not divisible; telling us that however far we reach into the cosmos, our destiny lies not in the stars but on Earth itself, in our own hands, in our own hearts.

In that moment of incredible technological achievement, people turned their thoughts to home and humanity—realizing that our destiny on Earth is one and the same; reminding us that no matter how far we explore the universe, our true purpose lies not among the stars but right here on Earth, in our own hands, in our own hearts.

We have endured a long night of the American spirit. But as our eyes catch the dimness of the first rays of dawn, let us not curse the remaining dark. Let us gather the light.

We have gone through a long night of the American spirit. But as we see the faint glow of the first rays of dawn, let’s not complain about the lingering darkness. Let’s embrace the light.

Our destiny offers, not the cup of despair, but the chalice of opportunity. So let us seize it, not in fear, but in gladness—and, "riders on the earth together," let us go forward, firm in our faith, steadfast in our purpose, cautious of the dangers; but sustained by our confidence in the will of God and the promise of man.

Our destiny presents us not with a cup of despair, but with a cup of opportunity. So let's embrace it, not out of fear, but with joy—and, "riders on the earth together," let's move forward, strong in our faith, determined in our purpose, aware of the risks; but supported by our confidence in God's will and humanity's promise.






RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

SATURDAY, JANUARY 20, 1973

[Transcriber's note: The election of 1972 consolidated the gains that the President had made with the electorate in 1968. Although the Democratic Party maintained majorities in the Congress, the presidential ambitions of South Dakota Senator George McGovern were unsuccessful. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger on a pavilion erected on the East Front of the Capitol.]

[Transcriber's note: The election of 1972 solidified the progress that the President achieved with voters in 1968. Even though the Democratic Party held majorities in Congress, South Dakota Senator George McGovern's presidential ambitions did not succeed. The oath of office was given by Chief Justice Warren Burger at a pavilion set up on the East Front of the Capitol.]


Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, Senator Cook, Mrs. Eisenhower, and my fellow citizens of this great and good country we share together:

Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, Senator Cook, Mrs. Eisenhower, and my fellow citizens of this great and good country we share together:

When we met here four years ago, America was bleak in spirit, depressed by the prospect of seemingly endless war abroad and of destructive conflict at home.

When we met here four years ago, America was in a tough place, weighed down by the thought of an endless war overseas and ongoing conflicts at home.

As we meet here today, we stand on the threshold of a new era of peace in the world.

As we gather here today, we are on the brink of a new era of global peace.

The central question before us is: How shall we use that peace? Let us resolve that this era we are about to enter will not be what other postwar periods have so often been: a time of retreat and isolation that leads to stagnation at home and invites new danger abroad.

The main question we have is: How will we utilize this peace? Let's commit to making this upcoming era different from previous postwar periods, which too often turned into times of withdrawal and isolation that led to stagnation at home and welcomed new threats from abroad.

Let us resolve that this will be what it can become: a time of great responsibilities greatly borne, in which we renew the spirit and the promise of America as we enter our third century as a nation.

Let’s commit to making this what it can be: a time of significant responsibilities taken on with care, where we revive the spirit and promise of America as we step into our third century as a nation.

This past year saw far-reaching results from our new policies for peace. By continuing to revitalize our traditional friendships, and by our missions to Peking and to Moscow, we were able to establish the base for a new and more durable pattern of relationships among the nations of the world. Because of America's bold initiatives, 1972 will be long remembered as the year of the greatest progress since the end of World War II toward a lasting peace in the world.

This past year brought significant outcomes from our new peace policies. By continuing to strengthen our traditional friendships and through our missions to Beijing and Moscow, we laid the groundwork for a new and more lasting pattern of relationships among the nations. Thanks to America's bold initiatives, 1972 will be remembered as the year of the greatest progress since World War II toward achieving lasting peace in the world.

The peace we seek in the world is not the flimsy peace which is merely an interlude between wars, but a peace which can endure for generations to come.

The peace we aim for in the world isn't just a temporary pause between conflicts; it's a lasting peace that can last for generations.

It is important that we understand both the necessity and the limitations of America's role in maintaining that peace.

It’s important for us to understand both the necessity and the limitations of America's role in keeping that peace.

Unless we in America work to preserve the peace, there will be no peace.

Unless we in America take action to maintain peace, there will be no peace.

Unless we in America work to preserve freedom, there will be no freedom.

Unless we in America take action to protect freedom, there will be no freedom.

But let us clearly understand the new nature of America's role, as a result of the new policies we have adopted over these past four years.

But let's clearly understand the new nature of America's role due to the new policies we've adopted over the past four years.

We shall respect our treaty commitments.

We will honor our treaty commitments.

We shall support vigorously the principle that no country has the right to impose its will or rule on another by force.

We will strongly uphold the principle that no country has the right to impose its will or control another by force.

We shall continue, in this era of negotiation, to work for the limitation of nuclear arms, and to reduce the danger of confrontation between the great powers.

We will keep working during this time of negotiation to limit nuclear arms and reduce the risk of confrontation between the major powers.

We shall do our share in defending peace and freedom in the world. But we shall expect others to do their share.

We will contribute to defending peace and freedom in the world. However, we expect others to do their part as well.

The time has passed when America will make every other nation's conflict our own, or make every other nation's future our responsibility, or presume to tell the people of other nations how to manage their own affairs.

The time has come when America will no longer take on every other nation's conflicts as our own, make every other nation's future our responsibility, or assume the authority to tell people in other countries how to handle their own matters.

Just as we respect the right of each nation to determine its own future, we also recognize the responsibility of each nation to secure its own future.

Just as we respect each nation's right to determine its own future, we also acknowledge that each nation has the responsibility to secure its own future.

Just as America's role is indispensable in preserving the world's peace, so is each nation's role indispensable in preserving its own peace.

Just like America's role is essential in maintaining global peace, every nation also plays a crucial part in maintaining its own peace.

Together with the rest of the world, let us resolve to move forward from the beginnings we have made. Let us continue to bring down the walls of hostility which have divided the world for too long, and to build in their place bridges of understanding—so that despite profound differences between systems of government, the people of the world can be friends.

Together with everyone else, let's commit to moving forward from the progress we've made. Let's keep breaking down the barriers of hostility that have separated the world for far too long, and replace them with bridges of understanding—so that despite our deep differences in systems of government, people around the globe can be friends.

Let us build a structure of peace in the world in which the weak are as safe as the strong—in which each respects the right of the other to live by a different system—in which those who would influence others will do so by the strength of their ideas, and not by the force of their arms.

Let’s create a world of peace where the vulnerable are as safe as the powerful—where everyone respects each other’s right to live by their own beliefs—where those who want to inspire others do so through the power of their ideas, not through violence.

Let us accept that high responsibility not as a burden, but gladly—gladly because the chance to build such a peace is the noblest endeavor in which a nation can engage; gladly, also, because only if we act greatly in meeting our responsibilities abroad will we remain a great Nation, and only if we remain a great Nation will we act greatly in meeting our challenges at home.

Let’s embrace this high responsibility not as a burden, but with eagerness—eagerly because the opportunity to create such peace is the most honorable effort a nation can take on; eagerly, also, because it’s only by taking bold action in fulfilling our responsibilities overseas that we can remain a great nation, and it’s only by remaining a great nation that we can effectively tackle our challenges at home.

We have the chance today to do more than ever before in our history to make life better in America—to ensure better education, better health, better housing, better transportation, a cleaner environment—to restore respect for law, to make our communities more livable—and to insure the God-given right of every American to full and equal opportunity.

We have the opportunity today to do more than ever in our history to improve life in America—to provide better education, better health, better housing, better transportation, and a cleaner environment—to restore respect for the law, to make our communities more livable—and to guarantee the God-given right of every American to full and equal opportunity.

Because the range of our needs is so great—because the reach of our opportunities is so great—let us be bold in our determination to meet those needs in new ways.

Because our needs are so diverse—and our opportunities are so broad—let's be bold in our commitment to meet those needs in new ways.

Just as building a structure of peace abroad has required turning away from old policies that failed, so building a new era of progress at home requires turning away from old policies that have failed.

Just like creating peace internationally has meant moving away from outdated policies that didn't work, fostering a new era of progress domestically also needs us to abandon old policies that haven't succeeded.

Abroad, the shift from old policies to new has not been a retreat from our responsibilities, but a better way to peace.

Abroad, the move from old policies to new hasn't been a withdrawal from our responsibilities, but a more effective path to peace.

And at home, the shift from old policies to new will not be a retreat from our responsibilities, but a better way to progress.

And at home, the change from old policies to new won't mean stepping back from our responsibilities, but rather a better way to move forward.

Abroad and at home, the key to those new responsibilities lies in the placing and the division of responsibility. We have lived too long with the consequences of attempting to gather all power and responsibility in Washington.

Abroad and at home, the key to those new responsibilities lies in where responsibilities are assigned and how they are divided. We've dealt with the consequences of trying to centralize all power and responsibility in Washington for too long.

Abroad and at home, the time has come to turn away from the condescending policies of paternalism—of "Washington knows best."

Abroad and at home, the time has come to move away from the patronizing policies of paternalism—of "Washington knows best."

A person can be expected to act responsibly only if he has responsibility. This is human nature. So let us encourage individuals at home and nations abroad to do more for themselves, to decide more for themselves. Let us locate responsibility in more places. Let us measure what we will do for others by what they will do for themselves.

A person can be expected to act responsibly only if they have responsibility. This is human nature. So let's encourage individuals at home and nations abroad to do more for themselves and make their own decisions. Let's assign responsibility to more areas. Let's gauge what we do for others by what they do for themselves.

That is why today I offer no promise of a purely governmental solution for every problem. We have lived too long with that false promise. In trusting too much in government, we have asked of it more than it can deliver. This leads only to inflated expectations, to reduced individual effort, and to a disappointment and frustration that erode confidence both in what government can do and in what people can do.

That’s why today I’m not making any promises about a purely government solution for every problem. We’ve relied on that false promise for too long. By trusting the government too much, we’ve expected more from it than it can actually provide. This only results in unrealistic expectations, less individual effort, and a disappointment and frustration that undermine confidence in both what the government can accomplish and what people are capable of.

Government must learn to take less from people so that people can do more for themselves.

Government needs to take less from people so that people can do more for themselves.

Let us remember that America was built not by government, but by people—not by welfare, but by work—not by shirking responsibility, but by seeking responsibility.

Let’s remember that America was built not by the government, but by the people—not by handouts, but by hard work—not by avoiding responsibility, but by embracing it.

In our own lives, let each of us ask—not just what will government do for me, but what can I do for myself?

In our own lives, let each of us ask—not just what will the government do for me, but what can I do for myself?

In the challenges we face together, let each of us ask—not just how can government help, but how can I help?

In the challenges we face together, let each of us ask—not just how can the government help, but how can I make a difference?

Your National Government has a great and vital role to play. And I pledge to you that where this Government should act, we will act boldly and we will lead boldly. But just as important is the role that each and every one of us must play, as an individual and as a member of his own community.

Your National Government has a significant and essential role to fulfill. I promise you that where this Government needs to take action, we will do so with confidence and leadership. However, just as crucial is the role that each of us must play, both as individuals and as part of our own communities.

From this day forward, let each of us make a solemn commitment in his own heart: to bear his responsibility, to do his part, to live his ideals—so that together, we can see the dawn of a new age of progress for America, and together, as we celebrate our 200th anniversary as a nation, we can do so proud in the fulfillment of our promise to ourselves and to the world.

From this day on, let each of us make a serious commitment in our hearts: to take on our responsibilities, do our part, and live by our ideals—so that together, we can witness the start of a new era of progress for America, and as we celebrate our 200th anniversary as a nation, we can be proud of fulfilling our promise to ourselves and to the world.

As America's longest and most difficult war comes to an end, let us again learn to debate our differences with civility and decency. And let each of us reach out for that one precious quality government cannot provide—a new level of respect for the rights and feelings of one another, a new level of respect for the individual human dignity which is the cherished birthright of every American.

As America's longest and toughest war wraps up, let's learn to discuss our differences with respect and kindness once more. And let each of us strive for that one invaluable quality that the government can't give us—a new level of respect for each other's rights and feelings, a new level of respect for the individual dignity that is the treasured birthright of every American.

Above all else, the time has come for us to renew our faith in ourselves and in America.

Above all else, it’s time for us to revive our faith in ourselves and in America.

In recent years, that faith has been challenged.

In recent years, that belief has been tested.

Our children have been taught to be ashamed of their country, ashamed of their parents, ashamed of America's record at home and of its role in the world.

Our kids have been taught to feel ashamed of their country, of their parents, of America's history at home, and of its role in the world.

At every turn, we have been beset by those who find everything wrong with America and little that is right. But I am confident that this will not be the judgment of history on these remarkable times in which we are privileged to live.

At every turn, we've been surrounded by those who see only what's wrong with America and hardly anything that's right. But I believe that this won't be how history views these remarkable times we're lucky to live in.

America's record in this century has been unparalleled in the world's history for its responsibility, for its generosity, for its creativity and for its progress.

America's record in this century is unmatched in world history for its sense of responsibility, generosity, creativity, and progress.

Let us be proud that our system has produced and provided more freedom and more abundance, more widely shared, than any other system in the history of the world.

Let’s take pride in the fact that our system has created and offered more freedom and wealth, shared more broadly, than any other system in history.

Let us be proud that in each of the four wars in which we have been engaged in this century, including the one we are now bringing to an end, we have fought not for our selfish advantage, but to help others resist aggression.

Let’s take pride in the fact that in each of the four wars we’ve been involved in this century, including the one we’re currently ending, we’ve fought not for our own gain, but to help others stand up against aggression.

Let us be proud that by our bold, new initiatives, and by our steadfastness for peace with honor, we have made a break-through toward creating in the world what the world has not known before—a structure of peace that can last, not merely for our time, but for generations to come.

Let’s take pride in the fact that through our bold new initiatives and our commitment to peace with honor, we have made a breakthrough in creating something the world has never seen before—a lasting structure of peace, not just for our time but for generations to come.

We are embarking here today on an era that presents challenges great as those any nation, or any generation, has ever faced.

We are starting a time today that brings challenges as great as those faced by any nation or generation in history.

We shall answer to God, to history, and to our conscience for the way in which we use these years.

We will be accountable to God, to history, and to our conscience for how we spend these years.

As I stand in this place, so hallowed by history, I think of others who have stood here before me. I think of the dreams they had for America, and I think of how each recognized that he needed help far beyond himself in order to make those dreams come true.

As I stand in this place, so sacred with history, I think about others who have stood here before me. I think about the dreams they had for America, and I recognize how each understood that they needed help beyond themselves to make those dreams a reality.

Today, I ask your prayers that in the years ahead I may have God's help in making decisions that are right for America, and I pray for your help so that together we may be worthy of our challenge.

Today, I ask for your prayers that in the coming years I may have God's guidance in making the best decisions for America, and I pray for your support so that together we can rise to our challenge.

Let us pledge together to make these next four years the best four years in America's history, so that on its 200th birthday America will be as young and as vital as when it began, and as bright a beacon of hope for all the world.

Let's promise to make these next four years the best four years in America's history, so that on its 200th birthday, America will be just as young and vibrant as when it started, and continue to be a shining beacon of hope for everyone around the world.

Let us go forward from here confident in hope, strong in our faith in one another, sustained by our faith in God who created us, and striving always to serve His purpose.

Let's move forward from here with confidence and hope, strong in our trust in each other, supported by our faith in God who made us, and always working to fulfill His purpose.






JIMMY CARTER, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 1977

[Transcriber's note: The Democrats reclaimed the White House in the 1976 election. The Governor from Georgia defeated Gerald Ford, who had become President on August 9, 1974, upon the resignation of President Nixon. The oath of office was taken on the Bible used in the first inauguration by George | Washington; it was administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger on the East Front of the Capitol. The new President and his family surprised the spectators by walking from the Capitol to the White House after the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: The Democrats took back the White House in the 1976 election. The Governor of Georgia defeated Gerald Ford, who had become President on August 9, 1974, after President Nixon resigned. The oath of office was taken on the Bible that was used in George Washington's first inauguration; it was administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger on the East Front of the Capitol. The new President and his family surprised the onlookers by walking from the Capitol to the White House after the ceremony.]


For myself and for our Nation, I want to thank my predecessor for all he has done to heal our land.

For myself and for our Nation, I want to thank my predecessor for everything he has done to heal our land.

In this outward and physical ceremony we attest once again to the inner and spiritual strength of our Nation. As my high school teacher, Miss Julia Coleman, used to say: "We must adjust to changing times and still hold to unchanging principles."

In this public and physical ceremony, we reaffirm the inner and spiritual strength of our Nation. As my high school teacher, Miss Julia Coleman, used to say: "We need to adapt to changing times while still holding on to timeless principles."

Here before me is the Bible used in the inauguration of our first President, in 1789, and I have just taken the oath of office on the Bible my mother gave me a few years ago, opened to a timeless admonition from the ancient prophet Micah:

Here in front of me is the Bible that was used during the inauguration of our first President in 1789, and I just took the oath of office on the Bible my mother gave me a few years ago, opened to a timeless message from the ancient prophet Micah:

"He hath showed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God." (Micah 6: 8)

"He has shown you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you, but to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God." (Micah 6: 8)

This inauguration ceremony marks a new beginning, a new dedication within our Government, and a new spirit among us all. A President may sense and proclaim that new spirit, but only a people can provide it.

This inauguration ceremony signifies a fresh start, a new commitment within our Government, and a renewed spirit among all of us. A President can recognize and express that new spirit, but it's the people who truly embody it.

Two centuries ago our Nation's birth was a milestone in the long quest for freedom, but the bold and brilliant dream which excited the founders of this Nation still awaits its consummation. I have no new dream to set forth today, but rather urge a fresh faith in the old dream.

Two hundred years ago, the founding of our nation was a significant moment in the ongoing pursuit of freedom, but the ambitious and inspiring vision that motivated the founders of this nation is still unfulfilled. I don't have a new vision to share today; instead, I encourage a renewed belief in the original vision.

Ours was the first society openly to define itself in terms of both spirituality and of human liberty. It is that unique self-definition which has given us an exceptional appeal, but it also imposes on us a special obligation, to take on those moral duties which, when assumed, seem invariably to be in our own best interests.

Ours was the first society to clearly define itself in terms of both spirituality and human freedom. This unique self-definition has given us an exceptional attractiveness, but it also places on us a special responsibility to embrace those moral duties that, when accepted, always seem to be in our best interests.

You have given me a great responsibility—to stay close to you, to be worthy of you, and to exemplify what you are. Let us create together a new national spirit of unity and trust. Your strength can compensate for my weakness, and your wisdom can help to minimize my mistakes.

You've given me a huge responsibility—to stay by your side, to be deserving of you, and to embody what you represent. Let's work together to create a new sense of national unity and trust. Your strength can make up for my weaknesses, and your wisdom can help reduce my mistakes.

Let us learn together and laugh together and work together and pray together, confident that in the end we will triumph together in the right.

Let's learn together, laugh together, work together, and pray together, knowing that in the end we will succeed together in what is right.

The American dream endures. We must once again have full faith in our country—and in one another. I believe America can be better. We can be even stronger than before.

The American dream lives on. We need to have complete faith in our country—and in each other—once again. I believe America can improve. We can be even stronger than we were before.

Let our recent mistakes bring a resurgent commitment to the basic principles of our Nation, for we know that if we despise our own government we have no future. We recall in special times when we have stood briefly, but magnificently, united. In those times no prize was beyond our grasp.

Let our recent mistakes inspire a renewed commitment to the fundamental principles of our nation, because we understand that if we reject our own government, we have no future. We remember the special moments when we stood together, even if just for a brief time, but with great strength. In those moments, nothing was out of our reach.

But we cannot dwell upon remembered glory. We cannot afford to drift. We reject the prospect of failure or mediocrity or an inferior quality of life for any person. Our Government must at the same time be both competent and compassionate.

But we can’t focus on past achievements. We can’t afford to just float along. We dismiss the idea of failure, mediocrity, or a lesser quality of life for anyone. Our government must be both skilled and caring at the same time.

We have already found a high degree of personal liberty, and we are now struggling to enhance equality of opportunity. Our commitment to human rights must be absolute, our laws fair, our natural beauty preserved; the powerful must not persecute the weak, and human dignity must be enhanced.

We have already achieved a significant level of personal freedom, and now we are working to improve equality of opportunity. Our dedication to human rights must be unwavering, our laws just, and our natural beauty protected; the powerful must not oppress the vulnerable, and we must promote human dignity.

We have learned that "more" is not necessarily "better," that even our great Nation has its recognized limits, and that we can neither answer all questions nor solve all problems. We cannot afford to do everything, nor can we afford to lack boldness as we meet the future. So, together, in a spirit of individual sacrifice for the common good, we must simply do our best.

We've come to understand that "more" doesn't always mean "better," that even our great Nation has its limits, and that we can't answer every question or solve every problem. We can't do everything, nor can we shy away from being bold as we face the future. So, together, with a spirit of individual sacrifice for the common good, we must just do our best.

Our Nation can be strong abroad only if it is strong at home. And we know that the best way to enhance freedom in other lands is to demonstrate here that our democratic system is worthy of emulation.

Our country can only be strong internationally if it's strong domestically. We understand that the best way to promote freedom in other countries is to show here that our democratic system is one others would want to imitate.

To be true to ourselves, we must be true to others. We will not behave in foreign places so as to violate our rules and standards here at home, for we know that the trust which our Nation earns is essential to our strength.

To be genuine with ourselves, we have to be genuine with others. We won't act in ways that go against our principles and standards when we're abroad, because we understand that the trust our Nation builds is crucial to our strength.

The world itself is now dominated by a new spirit. Peoples more numerous and more politically aware are craving and now demanding their place in the sun—not just for the benefit of their own physical condition, but for basic human rights.

The world is now influenced by a new energy. More people, who are increasingly politically aware, are seeking and demanding their place in the spotlight—not just for their own benefit, but for basic human rights.

The passion for freedom is on the rise. Tapping this new spirit, there can be no nobler nor more ambitious task for America to undertake on this day of a new beginning than to help shape a just and peaceful world that is truly humane.

The desire for freedom is growing stronger. Embracing this new energy, there’s no greater or more ambitious mission for America to take on today—a day of fresh starts—than to help create a fair and peaceful world that is genuinely compassionate.

We are a strong nation, and we will maintain strength so sufficient that it need not be proven in combat—a quiet strength based not merely on the size of an arsenal, but on the nobility of ideas.

We are a strong nation, and we will keep our strength at a level that doesn’t need to be proven in battle—a quiet strength built not just on the size of our weapons, but on the greatness of our ideas.

We will be ever vigilant and never vulnerable, and we will fight our wars against poverty, ignorance, and injustice—for those are the enemies against which our forces can be honorably marshaled.

We will always be watchful and never defenseless, and we will battle against poverty, ignorance, and injustice—because those are the enemies we can rightfully confront.

We are a purely idealistic Nation, but let no one confuse our idealism with weakness.

We are a purely idealistic nation, but don't mistake our idealism for weakness.

Because we are free we can never be indifferent to the fate of freedom elsewhere. Our moral sense dictates a clearcut preference for these societies which share with us an abiding respect for individual human rights. We do not seek to intimidate, but it is clear that a world which others can dominate with impunity would be inhospitable to decency and a threat to the well-being of all people.

Because we are free, we can never be indifferent to the fate of freedom in other places. Our moral sense gives us a clear preference for societies that share our deep respect for individual human rights. We don't aim to intimidate, but it's obvious that a world where others can dominate without consequences would be hostile to decency and a threat to the well-being of everyone.

The world is still engaged in a massive armaments race designed to ensure continuing equivalent strength among potential adversaries. We pledge perseverance and wisdom in our efforts to limit the world's armaments to those necessary for each nation's own domestic safety. And we will move this year a step toward ultimate goal—the elimination of all nuclear weapons from this Earth. We urge all other people to join us, for success can mean life instead of death.

The world is still locked in a huge arms race aimed at maintaining equal power among possible enemies. We commit to being persistent and wise in our efforts to limit the world's weapons to what's necessary for each country’s own safety. This year, we will take a step toward our ultimate goal—the complete elimination of all nuclear weapons from this planet. We encourage everyone to join us, as success could lead to life instead of death.

Within us, the people of the United States, there is evident a serious and purposeful rekindling of confidence. And I join in the hope that when my time as your President has ended, people might say this about our Nation:

Within us, the people of the United States, there is a clear and intentional renewal of confidence. And I share the hope that when my time as your President is over, people will say this about our Nation:

—that we had remembered the words of Micah and renewed our search for humility, mercy, and justice;

—that we had recalled the words of Micah and refreshed our pursuit of humility, mercy, and justice;

—that we had torn down the barriers that separated those of different race and region and religion, and where there had been mistrust, built unity, with a respect for diversity;

—that we had removed the barriers that divided people of different races, regions, and religions, and where there had been mistrust, built unity, with a respect for diversity;

—that we had found productive work for those able to perform it;

—that we had found meaningful work for those who were capable of doing it;

—that we had strengthened the American family, which is the basis of our society;

—that we had strengthened the American family, which is the foundation of our society;

—that we had ensured respect for the law, and equal treatment under the law, for the weak and the powerful, for the rich and the poor;

—that we had guaranteed respect for the law and equal treatment under the law for both the weak and the strong, the rich and the poor;

—and that we had enabled our people to be proud of their own Government once again.

—and that we had allowed our people to take pride in their own Government once more.

I would hope that the nations of the world might say that we had built a lasting peace, built not on weapons of war but on international policies which reflect our own most precious values.

I hope that the countries of the world can say we’ve created a lasting peace, one built not on weapons of war but on international policies that reflect our most cherished values.

These are not just my goals, and they will not be my accomplishments, but the affirmation of our Nation's continuing moral strength and our belief in an undiminished, ever-expanding American dream.

These aren’t just my goals; they won’t be my accomplishments either, but rather a reflection of our nation’s ongoing moral strength and our belief in an ever-growing American dream.






RONALD REAGAN, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1981

[Transcriber's note: For the first time, an inauguration ceremony was held on the terrace of the West Front of the Capitol. Chief Justice Warren Burger administered the oath of office to the former broadcaster, screen actor, and Governor of California. In the election of 1980, the Republicans won the White House and a majority in the Senate. On inauguration day, American hostages held by the revolutionary government of Iran were released.]

[Transcriber's note: For the first time, an inauguration ceremony was held on the terrace of the West Front of the Capitol. Chief Justice Warren Burger administered the oath of office to the former broadcaster, screen actor, and Governor of California. In the election of 1980, the Republicans won the White House and a majority in the Senate. On inauguration day, American hostages held by the revolutionary government of Iran were released.]


Senator Hatfield, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. President, Vice President Bush, Vice President Mondale, Senator Baker, Speaker O'Neill, Reverend Moomaw, and my fellow citizens: To a few of us here today, this is a solemn and most momentous occasion; and yet, in the history of our Nation, it is a commonplace occurrence. The orderly transfer of authority as called for in the Constitution routinely takes place as it has for almost two centuries and few of us stop to think how unique we really are. In the eyes of many in the world, this every-4-year ceremony we accept as normal is nothing less than a miracle.

Senator Hatfield, Chief Justice, President, Vice President Bush, Vice President Mondale, Senator Baker, Speaker O'Neill, Reverend Moomaw, and my fellow citizens: For some of us here today, this is a serious and incredibly significant moment; yet, in the history of our nation, it happens regularly. The smooth transfer of power outlined in the Constitution happens every time, as it has for almost two centuries, and few of us pause to consider how unique we truly are. In the eyes of many around the world, this ceremony we take for granted every four years is nothing short of a miracle.

Mr. President, I want our fellow citizens to know how much you did to carry on this tradition. By your gracious cooperation in the transition process, you have shown a watching world that we are a united people pledged to maintaining a political system which guarantees individual liberty to a greater degree than any other, and I thank you and your people for all your help in maintaining the continuity which is the bulwark of our Republic.

Mr. President, I want our fellow citizens to know how much you did to carry on this tradition. By your gracious cooperation during the transition, you have shown the world that we are a united people committed to upholding a political system that guarantees individual freedom more than any other. I thank you and your team for all your support in maintaining the continuity that is the foundation of our Republic.

The business of our nation goes forward. These United States are confronted with an economic affliction of great proportions. We suffer from the longest and one of the worst sustained inflations in our national history. It distorts our economic decisions, penalizes thrift, and crushes the struggling young and the fixed-income elderly alike. It threatens to shatter the lives of millions of our people.

The state of our nation is progressing. These United States are facing a significant economic challenge. We are experiencing the longest and one of the worst sustained inflations in our history. It skews our economic choices, punishes those who save, and burdens both struggling young people and the elderly on fixed incomes. It poses a serious threat to the lives of millions of our citizens.

Idle industries have cast workers into unemployment, causing human misery and personal indignity. Those who do work are denied a fair return for their labor by a tax system which penalizes successful achievement and keeps us from maintaining full productivity.

Idle industries have left workers unemployed, leading to human suffering and personal shame. Those who do have jobs are not receiving a fair reward for their labor due to a tax system that punishes success and prevents us from achieving full productivity.

But great as our tax burden is, it has not kept pace with public spending. For decades, we have piled deficit upon deficit, mortgaging our future and our children's future for the temporary convenience of the present. To continue this long trend is to guarantee tremendous social, cultural, political, and economic upheavals.

But as heavy as our tax burden is, it hasn't kept up with public spending. For decades, we've added deficit after deficit, putting our future and our children's future on the line for the short-term ease of the present. Continuing this trend will lead to significant social, cultural, political, and economic turmoil.

You and I, as individuals, can, by borrowing, live beyond our means, but for only a limited period of time. Why, then, should we think that collectively, as a nation, we are not bound by that same limitation?

You and I, as individuals, can live beyond our means by borrowing, but only for a limited time. So why should we think that, as a nation, we aren’t subject to the same limitation?

We must act today in order to preserve tomorrow. And let there be no misunderstanding—we are going to begin to act, beginning today.

We need to take action today to protect our future. Let's be clear—we're starting to act right now.

The economic ills we suffer have come upon us over several decades. They will not go away in days, weeks, or months, but they will go away. They will go away because we, as Americans, have the capacity now, as we have had in the past, to do whatever needs to be done to preserve this last and greatest bastion of freedom.

The economic problems we face have developed over many years. They won't disappear in a matter of days, weeks, or months, but they will disappear. They will go away because we, as Americans, have the ability now, just as we have in the past, to do whatever it takes to protect this last and greatest stronghold of freedom.

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem.

In this current crisis, the government is not the answer to our problem.

From time to time, we have been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. But if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price.

From time to time, we’ve been tempted to think that society has become too complex for us to govern ourselves, and that rule by an elite group is better than a government that is for, by, and of the people. But if none of us can govern ourselves, then how can anyone among us govern someone else? All of us, both inside and outside of government, must share the responsibility. The solutions we look for must be fair, with no one group being singled out to bear a heavier burden.

We hear much of special interest groups. Our concern must be for a special interest group that has been too long neglected. It knows no sectional boundaries or ethnic and racial divisions, and it crosses political party lines. It is made up of men and women who raise our food, patrol our streets, man our mines and our factories, teach our children, keep our homes, and heal us when we are sick—professionals, industrialists, shopkeepers, clerks, cabbies, and truckdrivers. They are, in short, "We the people," this breed called Americans.

We hear a lot about special interest groups. Our focus should be on a special interest group that has been overlooked for too long. It doesn’t recognize regional boundaries or ethnic and racial divisions, and it spans across political parties. It consists of the men and women who grow our food, patrol our streets, work in our mines and factories, teach our kids, maintain our homes, and care for us when we’re ill—professionals, business owners, shopkeepers, office workers, taxi drivers, and truck drivers. They are, simply put, "We the people," this group known as Americans.

Well, this administration's objective will be a healthy, vigorous, growing economy that provides equal opportunity for all Americans, with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination. Putting America back to work means putting all Americans back to work. Ending inflation means freeing all Americans from the terror of runaway living costs. All must share in the productive work of this "new beginning" and all must share in the bounty of a revived economy. With the idealism and fair play which are the core of our system and our strength, we can have a strong and prosperous America at peace with itself and the world.

Well, this administration's goal will be a healthy, vibrant, growing economy that offers equal opportunities for all Americans, without any barriers created by bigotry or discrimination. Getting America back to work means getting everyone back to work. Tackling inflation means freeing all Americans from the fear of skyrocketing living costs. Everyone should benefit from the productive work of this "new beginning" and everyone should share in the rewards of a revitalized economy. With the idealism and fairness that are the foundation of our system and our strength, we can achieve a strong and prosperous America at peace with itself and the world.

So, as we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government—not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth. Our Government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.

So, as we start, let’s take stock. We are a nation that has a government—not the other way around. This makes us unique among the nations of the Earth. Our government only has the power that the people give it. It’s time to review and push back against the expansion of government that seems to have exceeded the approval of the people.

It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the Federal establishment and to demand recognition of the distinction between the powers granted to the Federal Government and those reserved to the States or to the people. All of us need to be reminded that the Federal Government did not create the States; the States created the Federal Government.

I aim to limit the size and power of the federal government and to emphasize the difference between the powers given to the federal government and those reserved for the states or the people. We all need to remember that the federal government didn’t create the states; the states created the federal government.

Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it is not my intention to do away with government. It is, rather, to make it work-work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it.

Now, to be clear, I don’t want to get rid of government. Instead, I want it to work with us, not against us; to support us, not burden us. Government can and should create opportunities, not choke them; encourage productivity, not hinder it.

If we look to the answer as to why, for so many years, we achieved so much, prospered as no other people on Earth, it was because here, in this land, we unleashed the energy and individual genius of man to a greater extent than has ever been done before. Freedom and the dignity of the individual have been more available and assured here than in any other place on Earth. The price for this freedom at times has been high, but we have never been unwilling to pay that price.

If we consider why we achieved so much for so many years and prospered like no other people on Earth, it's because here, in this land, we unlocked the energy and individual talent of people more than ever before. Freedom and individual dignity have been more accessible and secure here than anywhere else on the planet. The cost of this freedom has sometimes been high, but we've never hesitated to pay that price.

It is no coincidence that our present troubles parallel and are proportionate to the intervention and intrusion in our lives that result from unnecessary and excessive growth of government. It is time for us to realize that we are too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams. We are not, as some would have us believe, doomed to an inevitable decline. I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing. So, with all the creative energy at our command, let us begin an era of national renewal. Let us renew our determination, our courage, and our strength. And let us renew our faith and our hope.

It's no accident that our current problems reflect and relate to the unnecessary and excessive growth of government in our lives. It's time for us to realize that we’re a strong nation, too capable to settle for small dreams. Contrary to what some may want us to think, we are not destined for inevitable decline. I don't believe in a fate that will come to us no matter what we do. However, I do believe in a fate that will catch up to us if we remain inactive. So, with all the creative energy we have, let’s start a new era of national renewal. Let’s revive our determination, courage, and strength. And let’s also rekindle our faith and hope.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we are in a time when there are no heroes just don't know where to look. You can see heroes every day going in and out of factory gates. Others, a handful in number, produce enough food to feed all of us and then the world beyond. You meet heroes across a counter—and they are on both sides of that counter. There are entrepreneurs with faith in themselves and faith in an idea who create new jobs, new wealth and opportunity. They are individuals and families whose taxes support the Government and whose voluntary gifts support church, charity, culture, art, and education. Their patriotism is quiet but deep. Their values sustain our national life.

We absolutely have the right to dream big. Those who claim we live in a time without heroes just don't know where to look. You can see heroes every day going in and out of factory gates. A few individuals produce enough food to feed all of us and the world beyond. You encounter heroes across a counter—and they exist on both sides. There are entrepreneurs who believe in themselves and their ideas, creating new jobs, wealth, and opportunities. They are individuals and families whose taxes support the government and whose charitable contributions support churches, charities, culture, art, and education. Their patriotism is quiet but profound. Their values sustain our nation’s life.

I have used the words "they" and "their" in speaking of these heroes. I could say "you" and "your" because I am addressing the heroes of whom I speak—you, the citizens of this blessed land. Your dreams, your hopes, your goals are going to be the dreams, the hopes, and the goals of this administration, so help me God.

I have used the words "they" and "their" when talking about these heroes. I could say "you" and "your" because I’m addressing the heroes I’m speaking about—you, the citizens of this wonderful country. Your dreams, your hopes, and your goals will be the dreams, hopes, and goals of this administration, so help me God.

We shall reflect the compassion that is so much a part of your makeup. How can we love our country and not love our countrymen, and loving them, reach out a hand when they fall, heal them when they are sick, and provide opportunities to make them self-sufficient so they will be equal in fact and not just in theory?

We will show the compassion that is such an important part of who you are. How can we love our country and not love our fellow citizens? If we truly care about them, we should offer a helping hand when they struggle, support them when they are ill, and create opportunities for them to become self-sufficient so they are truly equal, not just in theory.

Can we solve the problems confronting us? Well, the answer is an unequivocal and emphatic "yes." To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world's strongest economy.

Can we tackle the issues we face? The answer is a clear and strong "yes." To put it in the words of Winston Churchill, I didn't take the oath I just took to oversee the collapse of the world's strongest economy.

In the days ahead I will propose removing the roadblocks that have slowed our economy and reduced productivity. Steps will be taken aimed at restoring the balance between the various levels of government. Progress may be slow—measured in inches and feet, not miles—but we will progress. Is it time to reawaken this industrial giant, to get government back within its means, and to lighten our punitive tax burden. And these will be our first priorities, and on these principles, there will be no compromise.

In the coming days, I'll suggest getting rid of the obstacles that have held back our economy and decreased productivity. We'll take steps to restore balance between the different levels of government. Progress might be slow—measured in inches and feet, not miles—but we will make progress. It's time to revive this industrial giant, to bring government spending back in line, and to ease our heavy tax burden. These will be our top priorities, and we won't compromise on these principles.

On the eve of our struggle for independence a man who might have been one of the greatest among the Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, President of the Massachusetts Congress, said to his fellow Americans, "Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of.... On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important questions upon which rests the happiness and the liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves."

On the night before our fight for independence, a man who could have been one of the greatest Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, President of the Massachusetts Congress, told his fellow Americans, "Our country is in danger, but don’t lose hope.... The future of America depends on you. You are the ones who will decide the crucial issues that will determine the happiness and freedom of millions yet to come. Live up to your potential."

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act worthy of ourselves, ready to do what must be done to ensure happiness and liberty for ourselves, our children and our children's children.

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act in a way that reflects our worth, ready to do what needs to be done to secure happiness and freedom for ourselves, our children, and future generations.

And as we renew ourselves here in our own land, we will be seen as having greater strength throughout the world. We will again be the exemplar of freedom and a beacon of hope for those who do not now have freedom.

And as we refresh ourselves here at home, we'll be recognized as having greater strength around the globe. We will once again be a model of freedom and a source of hope for those who currently lack it.

To those neighbors and allies who share our freedom, we will strengthen our historic ties and assure them of our support and firm commitment. We will match loyalty with loyalty. We will strive for mutually beneficial relations. We will not use our friendship to impose on their sovereignty, for our own sovereignty is not for sale.

To our neighbors and allies who value freedom, we will enhance our long-standing connections and affirm our support and commitment. We will reciprocate loyalty with loyalty. We will work towards mutually beneficial relationships. We will not leverage our friendship to infringe on their sovereignty, just as our own sovereignty is not up for compromise.

As for the enemies of freedom, those who are potential adversaries, they will be reminded that peace is the highest aspiration of the American people. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it; we will not surrender for it—now or ever.

As for the enemies of freedom, those who could become adversaries, they will be reminded that peace is the highest goal of the American people. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it; we will not give up on it—now or ever.

Our forbearance should never be misunderstood. Our reluctance for conflict should not be misjudged as a failure of will. When action is required to preserve our national security, we will act. We will maintain sufficient strength to prevail if need be, knowing that if we do so we have the best chance of never having to use that strength.

Our patience should never be misinterpreted. Our hesitation to engage in conflict shouldn’t be seen as a lack of determination. When action is necessary to protect our national security, we will take it. We will keep enough strength to emerge victorious if needed, understanding that by doing so, we have the best chance of not having to use that strength at all.

Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have. It is a weapon that we as Americans do have. Let that be understood by those who practice terrorism and prey upon their neighbors.

Above all, we need to understand that no arsenal or weapon in the world is as powerful as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It's a weapon our opponents in today's world lack. It’s a weapon that we, as Americans, possess. Let this be clear to those who engage in terrorism and prey on their neighbors.

I am told that tens of thousands of prayer meetings are being held on this day, and for that I am deeply grateful. We are a nation under God, and I believe God intended for us to be free. It would be fitting and good, I think, if on each Inauguration Day in future years it should be declared a day of prayer.

I’ve heard that tens of thousands of prayer meetings are taking place today, and I’m really thankful for that. We’re a nation under God, and I believe God wants us to be free. It seems fitting and good to me that every Inauguration Day in the future should be declared a day of prayer.

This is the first time in history that this ceremony has been held, as you have been told, on this West Front of the Capitol. Standing here, one faces a magnificent vista, opening up on this city's special beauty and history. At the end of this open mall are those shrines to the giants on whose shoulders we stand.

This is the first time in history that this ceremony has been held, as you have been told, on this West Front of the Capitol. Standing here, you see a stunning view that showcases the unique beauty and history of this city. At the end of this open mall are those memorials to the giants on whose shoulders we stand.

Directly in front of me, the monument to a monumental man: George Washington, Father of our country. A man of humility who came to greatness reluctantly. He led America out of revolutionary victory into infant nationhood. Off to one side, the stately memorial to Thomas Jefferson. The Declaration of Independence flames with his eloquence.

Directly in front of me stands the monument to a remarkable man: George Washington, the Father of our country. He was a humble man who became great reluctantly. He led America from revolutionary victory into early nationhood. Off to one side, the impressive memorial to Thomas Jefferson. The Declaration of Independence shines with his eloquence.

And then beyond the Reflecting Pool the dignified columns of the Lincoln Memorial. Whoever would understand in his heart the meaning of America will find it in the life of Abraham Lincoln.

And then beyond the Reflecting Pool are the impressive columns of the Lincoln Memorial. Anyone who wants to truly understand the meaning of America will find it in the life of Abraham Lincoln.

Beyond those monuments to heroism is the Potomac River, and on the far shore the sloping hills of Arlington National Cemetery with its row on row of simple white markers bearing crosses or Stars of David. They add up to only a tiny fraction of the price that has been paid for our freedom.

Beyond those monuments to bravery is the Potomac River, and on the far shore, the sloping hills of Arlington National Cemetery with its rows of simple white markers featuring crosses or Stars of David. They represent only a small part of the sacrifice that has been made for our freedom.

Each one of those markers is a monument to the kinds of hero I spoke of earlier. Their lives ended in places called Belleau Wood, The Argonne, Omaha Beach, Salerno and halfway around the world on Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Pork Chop Hill, the Chosin Reservoir, and in a hundred rice paddies and jungles of a place called Vietnam.

Each of those markers stands as a tribute to the types of heroes I mentioned earlier. Their lives came to an end in places like Belleau Wood, The Argonne, Omaha Beach, Salerno, and on the other side of the globe in Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Pork Chop Hill, the Chosin Reservoir, and in countless rice paddies and jungles in a place called Vietnam.

Under one such marker lies a young man—Martin Treptow—who left his job in a small town barber shop in 1917 to go to France with the famed Rainbow Division. There, on the western front, he was killed trying to carry a message between battalions under heavy artillery fire.

Under one such marker lies a young man—Martin Treptow—who left his job at a small-town barber shop in 1917 to go to France with the famous Rainbow Division. There, on the western front, he was killed while attempting to deliver a message between battalions under heavy artillery fire.

We are told that on his body was found a diary. On the flyleaf under the heading, "My Pledge," he had written these words: "America must win this war. Therefore, I will work, I will save, I will sacrifice, I will endure, I will fight cheerfully and do my utmost, as if the issue of the whole struggle depended on me alone."

We’re told that a diary was found on his body. On the first page under the title, "My Pledge," he wrote these words: "America must win this war. So, I will work, I will save, I will sacrifice, I will endure, I will fight cheerfully, and I will do my best as if the outcome of the entire struggle depended on me alone."

The crisis we are facing today does not require of us the kind of sacrifice that Martin Treptow and so many thousands of others were called upon to make. It does require, however, our best effort, and our willingness to believe in ourselves and to believe in our capacity to perform great deeds; to believe that together, with God's help, we can and will resolve the problems which now confront us.

The crisis we face today doesn’t demand the kind of sacrifice that Martin Treptow and countless others had to make. However, it does require our best efforts and a willingness to believe in ourselves and our ability to accomplish great things; to believe that together, with God’s help, we can and will solve the problems that confront us now.

And, after all, why shouldn't we believe that? We are Americans. God bless you, and thank you.

And, after all, why shouldn't we believe that? We are Americans. God bless you, and thank you.






RONALD REAGAN, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

MONDAY, JANUARY 21, 1985

[Transcriber's note: January 20 was a Sunday, and the President took the oath of office, administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger, in the Grand Foyer of the White House. Weather that hovered near zero that night and on Monday forced the planners to cancel many of the outdoor events for the second inauguration. For the first time a President took the oath of office in the Capitol Rotunda. The oath was again administered by Chief Justice Burger. Jessye Norman sang at the ceremony.]

[Transcriber's note: January 20 was a Sunday, and the President took the oath of office, given by Chief Justice Warren Burger, in the Grand Foyer of the White House. The weather, which was near zero that night and on Monday, caused the planners to cancel many of the outdoor events for the second inauguration. For the first time, a President took the oath of office in the Capitol Rotunda. The oath was once again given by Chief Justice Burger. Jessye Norman performed at the ceremony.]


Senator Mathias, Chief Justice Burger, Vice President Bush, Speaker O'Neill, Senator Dole, Reverend Clergy, members of my family and friends, and my fellow citizens:

Senator Mathias, Chief Justice Burger, Vice President Bush, Speaker O'Neill, Senator Dole, Reverend Clergy, members of my family and friends, and my fellow citizens:

This day has been made brighter with the presence here of one who, for a time, has been absent—Senator John Stennis.

This day has been made brighter by the presence of someone who has, for a while, been away—Senator John Stennis.

God bless you and welcome back.

God bless you and welcome back.

There is, however, one who is not with us today: Representative Gillis Long of Louisiana left us last night. I wonder if we could all join in a moment of silent prayer. (Moment of silent prayer.) Amen.

There is, however, one person who isn't with us today: Representative Gillis Long of Louisiana passed away last night. I wonder if we could all take a moment for silent prayer. (Moment of silent prayer.) Amen.

There are no words adequate to express my thanks for the great honor that you have bestowed on me. I will do my utmost to be deserving of your trust.

There are no words enough to express my gratitude for the great honor you’ve given me. I will do my best to be worthy of your trust.

This is, as Senator Mathias told us, the 50th time that we the people have celebrated this historic occasion. When the first President, George Washington, placed his hand upon the Bible, he stood less than a single day's journey by horseback from raw, untamed wilderness. There were 4 million Americans in a union of 13 States. Today we are 60 times as many in a union of 50 States. We have lighted the world with our inventions, gone to the aid of mankind wherever in the world there was a cry for help, journeyed to the Moon and safely returned. So much has changed. And yet we stand together as we did two centuries ago.

This is, as Senator Mathias told us, the 50th time we the people have celebrated this historic occasion. When the first President, George Washington, placed his hand on the Bible, he was less than a day's horseback ride away from the wild, untamed wilderness. At that time, there were 4 million Americans in a union of 13 States. Today, we are 60 times that number in a union of 50 States. We have illuminated the world with our inventions, responded to cries for help wherever in the world they came from, traveled to the Moon, and returned safely. So much has changed. And yet we stand together as we did two centuries ago.

When I took this oath four years ago, I did so in a time of economic stress. Voices were raised saying we had to look to our past for the greatness and glory. But we, the present-day Americans, are not given to looking backward. In this blessed land, there is always a better tomorrow.

When I made this oath four years ago, it was during a time of economic stress. People were saying we needed to look to our past for greatness and glory. But we, as present-day Americans, don't tend to look back. In this blessed land, there's always a better tomorrow.

Four years ago, I spoke to you of a new beginning and we have accomplished that. But in another sense, our new beginning is a continuation of that beginning created two centuries ago when, for the first time in history, government, the people said, was not our master, it is our servant; its only power that which we the people allow it to have.

Four years ago, I talked to you about a fresh start, and we’ve achieved that. But in another way, our fresh start is a continuation of the one that began two hundred years ago when, for the first time in history, the government, as the people stated, was not our master; it is our servant, and its only power comes from what we, the people, choose to give it.

That system has never failed us, but, for a time, we failed the system. We asked things of government that government was not equipped to give. We yielded authority to the National Government that properly belonged to States or to local governments or to the people themselves. We allowed taxes and inflation to rob us of our earnings and savings and watched the great industrial machine that had made us the most productive people on Earth slow down and the number of unemployed increase.

That system has always worked for us, but there was a time when we let it down. We expected things from the government that it wasn't prepared to provide. We gave authority to the National Government that should have belonged to the States, local governments, or the people themselves. We allowed taxes and inflation to take away our earnings and savings, and we saw the powerful industrial machine that made us the most productive people on Earth start to slow down while unemployment rose.

By 1980, we knew it was time to renew our faith, to strive with all our strength toward the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with an orderly society.

By 1980, we realized it was time to refresh our beliefs, to push ourselves with all our might towards achieving the highest level of personal freedom that fits within an organized society.

We believed then and now there are no limits to growth and human progress when men and women are free to follow their dreams.

We believed then and still believe that there are no limits to growth and human progress when people are free to pursue their dreams.

And we were right to believe that. Tax rates have been reduced, inflation cut dramatically, and more people are employed than ever before in our history.

And we were right to believe that. Taxes have been lowered, inflation has dropped significantly, and more people are working than ever before in our history.

We are creating a nation once again vibrant, robust, and alive. But there are many mountains yet to climb. We will not rest until every American enjoys the fullness of freedom, dignity, and opportunity as our birthright. It is our birthright as citizens of this great Republic, and we'll meet this challenge.

We are building a nation that is once again vibrant, strong, and full of life. But there are still many challenges ahead. We won’t stop until every American experiences the full wealth of freedom, dignity, and opportunity that is our right. It is our right as citizens of this great Republic, and we will rise to this challenge.

These will be years when Americans have restored their confidence and tradition of progress; when our values of faith, family, work, and neighborhood were restated for a modern age; when our economy was finally freed from government's grip; when we made sincere efforts at meaningful arms reduction, rebuilding our defenses, our economy, and developing new technologies, and helped preserve peace in a troubled world; when Americans courageously supported the struggle for liberty, self-government, and free enterprise throughout the world, and turned the tide of history away from totalitarian darkness and into the warm sunlight of human freedom.

These will be years when Americans regain their confidence and the tradition of progress; when our values of belief, family, hard work, and community are reaffirmed for a modern age; when our economy is finally released from government control; when we make genuine efforts at meaningful arms reduction, strengthen our defenses, boost our economy, and develop new technologies, while helping to maintain peace in a troubled world; when Americans boldly support the fight for liberty, self-governance, and free enterprise around the globe, turning the tide of history away from totalitarian oppression and into the bright light of human freedom.

My fellow citizens, our Nation is poised for greatness. We must do what we know is right and do it with all our might. Let history say of us, "These were golden years—when the American Revolution was reborn, when freedom gained new life, when America reached for her best."

My fellow citizens, our nation is ready for greatness. We must do what we know is right and do it with all our strength. Let history remember us as, "These were golden years—when the American Revolution was revived, when freedom flourished, when America aspired to her best."

Our two-party system has served us well over the years, but never better than in those times of great challenge when we came together not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans united in a common cause.

Our two-party system has worked well for us over the years, but it's been most effective during tough times when we came together not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans united for a common purpose.

Two of our Founding Fathers, a Boston lawyer named Adams and a Virginia planter named Jefferson, members of that remarkable group who met in Independence Hall and dared to think they could start the world over again, left us an important lesson. They had become political rivals in the Presidential election of 1800. Then years later, when both were retired, and age had softened their anger, they began to speak to each other again through letters. A bond was reestablished between those two who had helped create this government of ours.

Two of our Founding Fathers, a Boston lawyer named Adams and a Virginia planter named Jefferson, part of that amazing group who gathered in Independence Hall and believed they could start the world anew, left us an important lesson. They became political rivals in the presidential election of 1800. Years later, after both had retired and time had mellowed their anger, they started communicating again through letters. A connection was rekindled between the two who helped build our government.

In 1826, the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, they both died. They died on the same day, within a few hours of each other, and that day was the Fourth of July.

In 1826, the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, they both passed away. They died on the same day, just a few hours apart, and that day was the Fourth of July.

In one of those letters exchanged in the sunset of their lives, Jefferson wrote: "It carries me back to the times when, beset with difficulties and dangers, we were fellow laborers in the same cause, struggling for what is most valuable to man, his right to self-government. Laboring always at the same oar, with some wave ever ahead threatening to overwhelm us, and yet passing harmless...we rode through the storm with heart and hand."

In one of those letters exchanged near the end of their lives, Jefferson wrote: "It takes me back to the times when, overwhelmed with challenges and risks, we were working together for the same cause, fighting for what is most important to humanity, our right to self-govern. Always rowing in the same boat, with some wave always looming ahead threatening to drown us, yet we passed through safely...we navigated the storm with determination and unity."

Well, with heart and hand, let us stand as one today: One people under God determined that our future shall be worthy of our past. As we do, we must not repeat the well-intentioned errors of our past. We must never again abuse the trust of working men and women, by sending their earnings on a futile chase after the spiraling demands of a bloated Federal Establishment. You elected us in 1980 to end this prescription for disaster, and I don't believe you reelected us in 1984 to reverse course.

Well, let’s come together today with hearts and hands united: One people under God, committed to ensuring our future is worthy of our past. As we do this, we must not repeat the mistakes we made before, even though they were made with good intentions. We must never again betray the trust of workers by allowing their hard-earned money to be wasted on the ever-increasing demands of a bloated Federal Government. You elected us in 1980 to put an end to this recipe for disaster, and I don't believe you reelected us in 1984 to go back on that promise.

At the heart of our efforts is one idea vindicated by 25 straight months of economic growth: Freedom and incentives unleash the drive and entrepreneurial genius that are the core of human progress. We have begun to increase the rewards for work, savings, and investment; reduce the increase in the cost and size of government and its interference in people's lives.

At the core of our efforts is one idea confirmed by 25 straight months of economic growth: Freedom and incentives unleash the drive and entrepreneurial spirit that are essential to human progress. We have started to boost the rewards for working, saving, and investing; decrease the growth in the cost and size of government and its interference in people's lives.

We must simplify our tax system, make it more fair, and bring the rates down for all who work and earn. We must think anew and move with a new boldness, so every American who seeks work can find work; so the least among us shall have an equal chance to achieve the greatest things—to be heroes who heal our sick, feed the hungry, protect peace among nations, and leave this world a better place.

We need to simplify our tax system, make it fairer, and lower the rates for everyone who works and earns. We have to rethink our approach and act with confidence, so that every American who wants a job can find one; so that the most vulnerable among us have an equal opportunity to achieve great things—to be heroes who care for the sick, feed the hungry, promote peace among nations, and leave this world better than we found it.

The time has come for a new American emancipation—a great national drive to tear down economic barriers and liberate the spirit of enterprise in the most distressed areas of our country. My friends, together we can do this, and do it we must, so help me God.

The time has arrived for a new American freedom—a major national effort to break down economic barriers and unleash the spirit of entrepreneurship in the most struggling areas of our country. My friends, we can achieve this together, and we must, with God's help.

From new freedom will spring new opportunities for growth, a more productive, fulfilled and united people, and a stronger America—an America that will lead the technological revolution, and also open its mind and heart and soul to the treasures of literature, music, and poetry, and the values of faith, courage, and love.

From new freedom will come new chances for growth, a more productive, fulfilled, and united people, and a stronger America—an America that will lead the tech revolution and also embrace the treasures of literature, music, and poetry, along with the values of faith, courage, and love.

A dynamic economy, with more citizens working and paying taxes, will be our strongest tool to bring down budget deficits. But an almost unbroken 50 years of deficit spending has finally brought us to a time of reckoning. We have come to a turning point, a moment for hard decisions. I have asked the Cabinet and my staff a question, and now I put the same question to all of you: If not us, who? And if not now, when? It must be done by all of us going forward with a program aimed at reaching a balanced budget. We can then begin reducing the national debt.

A strong economy, where more people are working and paying taxes, will be our best way to lower budget deficits. However, nearly 50 years of continuous deficit spending has brought us to a critical moment. We’ve reached a turning point, a time for tough choices. I’ve asked the Cabinet and my team a question, and now I’m asking all of you: If not us, then who? And if not now, when? We need to all come together to create a plan aimed at achieving a balanced budget. Then we can start tackling the national debt.

I will shortly submit a budget to the Congress aimed at freezing government program spending for the next year. Beyond that, we must take further steps to permanently control Government's power to tax and spend. We must act now to protect future generations from Government's desire to spend its citizens' money and tax them into servitude when the bills come due. Let us make it unconstitutional for the Federal Government to spend more than the Federal Government takes in.

I will soon submit a budget to Congress that aims to freeze government program spending for the next year. Beyond that, we need to take additional steps to permanently limit the government’s power to tax and spend. We must act now to protect future generations from the government’s tendency to spend its citizens' money and tax them into financial hardship when the bills come due. Let’s make it unconstitutional for the federal government to spend more than it takes in.

We have already started returning to the people and to State and local governments responsibilities better handled by them. Now, there is a place for the Federal Government in matters of social compassion. But our fundamental goals must be to reduce dependency and upgrade the dignity of those who are infirm or disadvantaged. And here a growing economy and support from family and community offer our best chance for a society where compassion is a way of life, where the old and infirm are cared for, the young and, yes, the unborn protected, and the unfortunate looked after and made self-sufficient.

We have already begun to return responsibilities to the people and to state and local governments, as they can manage them better. There is a role for the federal government in matters of social compassion. However, our main goals must be to reduce dependency and enhance the dignity of those who are weak or disadvantaged. A growing economy, along with support from family and community, provides us with the best opportunity for a society where compassion is part of everyday life, where the elderly and disabled are cared for, the young—and yes, the unborn—are protected, and those who are struggling are looked after and made self-sufficient.

And there is another area where the Federal Government can play a part. As an older American, I remember a time when people of different race, creed, or ethnic origin in our land found hatred and prejudice installed in social custom and, yes, in law. There is no story more heartening in our history than the progress that we have made toward the "brotherhood of man" that God intended for us. Let us resolve there will be no turning back or hesitation on the road to an America rich in dignity and abundant with opportunity for all our citizens.

And there’s another way the federal government can make a difference. As an older American, I remember a time when people of different races, religions, or ethnic backgrounds in our country faced hatred and prejudice deeply rooted in social customs and, yes, in laws. There’s no story more uplifting in our history than the progress we’ve made toward the “brotherhood of man” that God intended for us. Let’s commit to never turning back or hesitating on the path to an America filled with dignity and overflowing with opportunities for all our citizens.

Let us resolve that we the people will build an American opportunity society in which all of us—white and black, rich and poor, young and old—will go forward together arm in arm. Again, let us remember that though our heritage is one of blood lines from every corner of the Earth, we are all Americans pledged to carry on this last, best hope of man on Earth.

Let’s commit to creating an American opportunity society where everyone—white and black, rich and poor, young and old—moves forward together side by side. And let’s remember that even though our backgrounds come from every part of the world, we are all Americans dedicated to continuing this final, greatest hope for humanity on Earth.

I have spoken of our domestic goals and the limitations which we should put on our National Government. Now let me turn to a task which is the primary responsibility of National Government—the safety and security of our people.

I have talked about our domestic goals and the restrictions we should place on our National Government. Now, let me focus on a task that is the main responsibility of the National Government—the safety and security of our people.

Today, we utter no prayer more fervently than the ancient prayer for peace on Earth. Yet history has shown that peace will not come, nor will our freedom be preserved, by good will alone. There are those in the world who scorn our vision of human dignity and freedom. One nation, the Soviet Union, has conducted the greatest military buildup in the history of man, building arsenals of awesome offensive weapons.

Today, we express the ancient prayer for peace on Earth with greater intensity than ever. However, history has taught us that peace will not be achieved, nor will our freedom be secured, just through goodwill. There are people in the world who reject our ideals of human dignity and freedom. One country, the Soviet Union, has carried out the largest military expansion in human history, creating massive stockpiles of powerful offensive weapons.

We have made progress in restoring our defense capability. But much remains to be done. There must be no wavering by us, nor any doubts by others, that America will meet her responsibilities to remain free, secure, and at peace.

We’ve made progress in rebuilding our defense capability. But there’s still a lot to do. We must remain strong and sure, and others should have no doubt that America will fulfill its responsibilities to stay free, secure, and at peace.

There is only one way safely and legitimately to reduce the cost of national security, and that is to reduce the need for it. And this we are trying to do in negotiations with the Soviet Union. We are not just discussing limits on a further increase of nuclear weapons. We seek, instead, to reduce their number. We seek the total elimination one day of nuclear weapons from the face of the Earth.

There’s really only one safe and legitimate way to cut the cost of national security, and that’s by lowering the need for it. That’s what we’re trying to achieve in our negotiations with the Soviet Union. We're not just talking about capping the further increase of nuclear weapons. Instead, we aim to decrease their numbers. We strive for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons from the planet one day.

Now, for decades, we and the Soviets have lived under the threat of mutual assured destruction; if either resorted to the use of nuclear weapons, the other could retaliate and destroy the one who had started it. Is there either logic or morality in believing that if one side threatens to kill tens of millions of our people, our only recourse is to threaten killing tens of millions of theirs?

Now, for decades, we and the Soviets have lived under the threat of mutual assured destruction; if either side used nuclear weapons, the other could retaliate and take out the one who started it. Is there any logic or morality in thinking that if one side threatens to kill tens of millions of our people, our only response is to threaten to kill tens of millions of theirs?

I have approved a research program to find, if we can, a security shield that would destroy nuclear missiles before they reach their target. It wouldn't kill people, it would destroy weapons. It wouldn't militarize space, it would help demilitarize the arsenals of Earth. It would render nuclear weapons obsolete. We will meet with the Soviets, hoping that we can agree on a way to rid the world of the threat of nuclear destruction.

I have approved a research program to see if we can create a security shield that would take out nuclear missiles before they hit their targets. It wouldn't harm people; it would eliminate weapons. It wouldn't turn space into a battlefield; it would help reduce the arsenals on Earth. It would make nuclear weapons irrelevant. We will meet with the Soviets, hoping that we can come to an agreement on how to eliminate the threat of nuclear destruction worldwide.

We strive for peace and security, heartened by the changes all around us. Since the turn of the century, the number of democracies in the world has grown fourfold. Human freedom is on the march, and nowhere more so than our own hemisphere. Freedom is one of the deepest and noblest aspirations of the human spirit. People, worldwide, hunger for the right of self-determination, for those inalienable rights that make for human dignity and progress.

We aim for peace and security, encouraged by the changes happening around us. Since the beginning of the century, the number of democracies worldwide has increased four times. Human freedom is advancing, especially in our own region. Freedom is one of the most profound and admirable desires of the human spirit. People around the globe yearn for the right to self-determination, for those fundamental rights that contribute to human dignity and progress.

America must remain freedom's staunchest friend, for freedom is our best ally.

America must continue to be freedom's strongest supporter because freedom is our greatest ally.

And it is the world's only hope, to conquer poverty and preserve peace. Every blow we inflict against poverty will be a blow against its dark allies of oppression and war. Every victory for human freedom will be a victory for world peace.

And it's the only hope for the world to overcome poverty and maintain peace. Every strike we deliver against poverty will also hit its dark partners of oppression and war. Every win for human freedom will be a win for global peace.

So we go forward today, a nation still mighty in its youth and powerful in its purpose. With our alliances strengthened, with our economy leading the world to a new age of economic expansion, we look forward to a world rich in possibilities. And all this because we have worked and acted together, not as members of political parties, but as Americans.

So today we move ahead as a nation that is still strong in its youth and focused on its goals. With our alliances solidified and our economy driving global growth into a new era, we are excited about a world full of opportunities. All of this is thanks to our collaboration and actions together, not as members of political parties, but as Americans.

My friends, we live in a world that is lit by lightning. So much is changing and will change, but so much endures, and transcends time.

My friends, we live in a world that is lit by lightning. So much is changing and will change, but so much endures and transcends time.

History is a ribbon, always unfurling; history is a journey. And as we continue our journey, we think of those who traveled before us. We stand together again at the steps of this symbol of our democracy—or we would have been standing at the steps if it hadn't gotten so cold. Now we are standing inside this symbol of our democracy. Now we hear again the echoes of our past: a general falls to his knees in the hard snow of Valley Forge; a lonely President paces the darkened halls, and ponders his struggle to preserve the Union; the men of the Alamo call out encouragement to each other; a settler pushes west and sings a song, and the song echoes out forever and fills the unknowing air.

History is like a ribbon, always unwinding; it's a journey. And as we continue this journey, we think of those who came before us. We stand together once again at the steps of this symbol of our democracy—or at least we would have been standing on the steps if it hadn't gotten so cold. Now we are inside this symbol of our democracy. Now we hear again the echoes of our past: a general kneels in the cold snow of Valley Forge; a lonely President walks the dark halls, contemplating his fight to keep the Union together; the men at the Alamo shout words of encouragement to one another; a settler pushes westward and sings a song, and that song echoes on forever, filling the unaware air.

It is the American sound. It is hopeful, big-hearted, idealistic, daring, decent, and fair. That's our heritage; that is our song. We sing it still. For all our problems, our differences, we are together as of old, as we raise our voices to the God who is the Author of this most tender music. And may He continue to hold us close as we fill the world with our sound—sound in unity, affection, and love—one people under God, dedicated to the dream of freedom that He has placed in the human heart, called upon now to pass that dream on to a waiting and hopeful world.

It’s the American sound. It’s hopeful, warm-hearted, idealistic, bold, decent, and fair. That’s our heritage; that’s our song. We still sing it. Despite all our issues and differences, we’re united like before, as we lift our voices to the God who is the creator of this beautiful music. May He continue to keep us close as we share our sound with the world—sound in unity, affection, and love—one people under God, committed to the dream of freedom that He has instilled in the human heart, now called to pass that dream on to a waiting and hopeful world.

God bless you and may God bless America.

God bless you, and may God bless America.






GEORGE BUSH, INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 1989

[Transcriber's note: The 200th anniversary of the Presidency was observed as George Bush took the executive oath on the same Bible George Washington used in 1789. The ceremony occurred on a platform on the terrace of the West Front of the Capitol. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice William Rehnquist. After the ceremony the President and Mrs. Bush led the inaugural parade from the Capitol to the White House, walking along several blocks of Pennsylvania Avenue to greet the spectators.]

[Transcriber's note: The 200th anniversary of the Presidency was observed as George Bush took the oath of office on the same Bible that George Washington used in 1789. The ceremony took place on a platform on the terrace of the West Front of the Capitol. Chief Justice William Rehnquist administered the oath. After the ceremony, President and Mrs. Bush led the inaugural parade from the Capitol to the White House, walking along several blocks of Pennsylvania Avenue to greet the spectators.]


Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. President, Vice President Quayle, Senator Mitchell, Speaker Wright, Senator Dole, Congressman Michel, and fellow citizens, neighbors, and friends:

Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. President, Vice President Quayle, Senator Mitchell, Speaker Wright, Senator Dole, Congressman Michel, and fellow citizens, neighbors, and friends:

There is a man here who has earned a lasting place in our hearts and in our history. President Reagan, on behalf of our Nation, I thank you for the wonderful things that you have done for America.

There’s a man here who has earned a special spot in our hearts and in our history. President Reagan, on behalf of our Nation, I want to thank you for all the amazing things you’ve done for America.

I have just repeated word for word the oath taken by George Washington 200 years ago, and the Bible on which I placed my hand is the Bible on which he placed his. It is right that the memory of Washington be with us today, not only because this is our Bicentennial Inauguration, but because Washington remains the Father of our Country. And he would, I think, be gladdened by this day; for today is the concrete expression of a stunning fact: our continuity these 200 years since our government began.

I just recited word for word the oath taken by George Washington 200 years ago, and the Bible I put my hand on is the same one he used. It's fitting that we remember Washington today, not just because this is our Bicentennial Inauguration, but because he is still the Father of our Country. I believe he would be happy on this day; today represents a remarkable reality: our continuity over these 200 years since our government was established.

We meet on democracy's front porch, a good place to talk as neighbors and as friends. For this is a day when our nation is made whole, when our differences, for a moment, are suspended.

We gather on democracy's front porch, a great spot to chat as neighbors and friends. Today is a day when our nation comes together, when our differences are put aside, even if just for a moment.

And my first act as President is a prayer. I ask you to bow your heads:

And my first act as President is to say a prayer. I ask you to bow your heads:

Heavenly Father, we bow our heads and thank You for Your love. Accept our thanks for the peace that yields this day and the shared faith that makes its continuance likely. Make us strong to do Your work, willing to heed and hear Your will, and write on our hearts these words: "Use power to help people." For we are given power not to advance our own purposes, nor to make a great show in the world, nor a name. There is but one just use of power, and it is to serve people. Help us to remember it, Lord. Amen.

Heavenly Father, we bow our heads and thank You for Your love. Please accept our gratitude for the peace that this day brings and the shared faith that encourages its continuation. Give us the strength to do Your work, and help us be willing to listen to Your will. Write on our hearts these words: "Use power to help people." We are given power not to fulfill our own goals, to show off in the world, or to gain recognition. There is only one rightful use of power, and that is to serve others. Help us to remember this, Lord. Amen.

I come before you and assume the Presidency at a moment rich with promise. We live in a peaceful, prosperous time, but we can make it better. For a new breeze is blowing, and a world refreshed by freedom seems reborn; for in man's heart, if not in fact, the day of the dictator is over. The totalitarian era is passing, its old ideas blown away like leaves from an ancient, lifeless tree. A new breeze is blowing, and a nation refreshed by freedom stands ready to push on. There is new ground to be broken, and new action to be taken. There are times when the future seems thick as a fog; you sit and wait, hoping the mists will lift and reveal the right path. But this is a time when the future seems a door you can walk right through into a room called tomorrow.

I stand before you and take on the Presidency at a moment full of promise. We’re living in a peaceful, prosperous time, but we can make it even better. A new energy is in the air, and a world revitalized by freedom feels renewed; for in people's hearts, if not in reality, the era of the dictator is done. The age of totalitarianism is fading, its old ideas swept away like leaves from a dead tree. A fresh wind is blowing, and a nation reenergized by freedom is ready to move forward. There's new ground to break and new actions to take. There are moments when the future feels thick like fog; you sit and wait, hoping the mist will clear and show you the right path. But this is a time when the future feels like a door you can walk right through into a room called tomorrow.

Great nations of the world are moving toward democracy through the door to freedom. Men and women of the world move toward free markets through the door to prosperity. The people of the world agitate for free expression and free thought through the door to the moral and intellectual satisfactions that only liberty allows.

Great nations around the world are progressing towards democracy through the doorway to freedom. Men and women everywhere strive for free markets through the pathway to prosperity. The people of the world are advocating for free expression and free thought through the gateway to the moral and intellectual fulfillment that only liberty can provide.

We know what works: Freedom works. We know what's right: Freedom is right. We know how to secure a more just and prosperous life for man on Earth: through free markets, free speech, free elections, and the exercise of free will unhampered by the state.

We know what works: freedom works. We know what's right: freedom is right. We know how to ensure a more just and prosperous life for everyone on Earth: through free markets, free speech, free elections, and the exercise of free will without interference from the government.

For the first time in this century, for the first time in perhaps all history, man does not have to invent a system by which to live. We don't have to talk late into the night about which form of government is better. We don't have to wrest justice from the kings. We only have to summon it from within ourselves. We must act on what we know. I take as my guide the hope of a saint: In crucial things, unity; in important things, diversity; in all things, generosity.

For the first time in this century, and maybe even in all of history, humanity doesn’t need to create a system to live by. We don’t have to have long debates late into the night about which type of government is best. We don’t have to fight for justice from the rulers. We just have to bring it forth from within ourselves. We need to act on what we understand. I take inspiration from a saint’s hope: In essential matters, unity; in important matters, diversity; in everything, generosity.

America today is a proud, free nation, decent and civil, a place we cannot help but love. We know in our hearts, not loudly and proudly, but as a simple fact, that this country has meaning beyond what we see, and that our strength is a force for good. But have we changed as a nation even in our time? Are we enthralled with material things, less appreciative of the nobility of work and sacrifice?

America today is a proud, free nation—decent and civil—a place we can’t help but love. We know in our hearts, not loudly and proudly, but as a plain fact, that this country has significance beyond what we see, and that our strength is a force for good. But have we changed as a nation even in our time? Are we captivated by material things, less appreciative of the nobility of work and sacrifice?

My friends, we are not the sum of our possessions. They are not the measure of our lives. In our hearts we know what matters. We cannot hope only to leave our children a bigger car, a bigger bank account. We must hope to give them a sense of what it means to be a loyal friend, a loving parent, a citizen who leaves his home, his neighborhood and town better than he found it. What do we want the men and women who work with us to say when we are no longer there? That we were more driven to succeed than anyone around us? Or that we stopped to ask if a sick child had gotten better, and stayed a moment there to trade a word of friendship?

My friends, we’re not defined by what we own. Our possessions don’t determine the value of our lives. Deep down, we know what truly matters. We shouldn't only aim to leave our kids a nicer car or a bigger bank account. We should focus on giving them an understanding of what it means to be a loyal friend, a caring parent, and a community member who improves their home, neighborhood, and town. What do we want our colleagues to remember about us when we’re gone? That we were more focused on success than anyone else? Or that we took the time to check on a sick child and shared a moment of kindness?

No President, no government, can teach us to remember what is best in what we are. But if the man you have chosen to lead this government can help make a difference; if he can celebrate the quieter, deeper successes that are made not of gold and silk, but of better hearts and finer souls; if he can do these things, then he must.

No President, no government, can teach us to remember the best parts of who we are. But if the person you've chosen to lead this government can help make a difference; if he can acknowledge the quieter, deeper successes that are made not of wealth and luxury, but of better hearts and finer souls; if he can do these things, then he must.

America is never wholly herself unless she is engaged in high moral principle. We as a people have such a purpose today. It is to make kinder the face of the Nation and gentler the face of the world. My friends, we have work to do. There are the homeless, lost and roaming. There are the children who have nothing, no love, no normalcy. There are those who cannot free themselves of enslavement to whatever addiction—drugs, welfare, the demoralization that rules the slums. There is crime to be conquered, the rough crime of the streets. There are young women to be helped who are about to become mothers of children they can't care for and might not love. They need our care, our guidance, and our education, though we bless them for choosing life.

America is never truly herself unless she's committed to high moral standards. As a people, we have that purpose today. It’s to make the Nation kinder and the world gentler. My friends, we have work to do. There are the homeless, wandering and lost. There are children who have nothing—no love, no stability. There are those trapped by various addictions—drugs, dependency on welfare, or the hopelessness that dominates the slums. There’s crime that needs to be fought, the harsh crime on the streets. There are young women who need help as they are about to become mothers of children they can't care for and might not love. They need our support, our guidance, and our education, even as we commend them for choosing life.

The old solution, the old way, was to think that public money alone could end these problems. But we have learned that is not so. And in any case, our funds are low. We have a deficit to bring down. We have more will than wallet; but will is what we need. We will make the hard choices, looking at what we have and perhaps allocating it differently, making our decisions based on honest need and prudent safety. And then we will do the wisest thing of all: We will turn to the only resource we have that in times of need always grows—the goodness and the courage of the American people.

The old solution, the old way, was to believe that public money alone could solve these problems. But we've learned that's not the case. And anyway, our funds are limited. We have a deficit to reduce. We have more determination than cash; but determination is what we need. We will make tough choices, evaluating what we have and possibly reallocating it, making our decisions based on genuine need and careful safety. And then we will do the smartest thing of all: We will rely on the only resource we have that always grows in times of need—the goodness and courage of the American people.

I am speaking of a new engagement in the lives of others, a new activism, hands-on and involved, that gets the job done. We must bring in the generations, harnessing the unused talent of the elderly and the unfocused energy of the young. For not only leadership is passed from generation to generation, but so is stewardship. And the generation born after the Second World War has come of age.

I’m talking about a fresh commitment to the lives of others, a new kind of activism that’s active and engaged, making a real impact. We need to bring in all ages, tapping into the untapped skills of older adults and the vibrant energy of the youth. Leadership isn’t the only thing that gets passed down through the generations; so does responsibility. The generation that was born after World War II has reached adulthood.

I have spoken of a thousand points of light, of all the community organizations that are spread like stars throughout the Nation, doing good. We will work hand in hand, encouraging, sometimes leading, sometimes being led, rewarding. We will work on this in the White House, in the Cabinet agencies. I will go to the people and the programs that are the brighter points of light, and I will ask every member of my government to become involved. The old ideas are new again because they are not old, they are timeless: duty, sacrifice, commitment, and a patriotism that finds its expression in taking part and pitching in.

I’ve talked about a thousand points of light, about all the community organizations that are spread like stars across the nation, doing good work. We will collaborate closely, sometimes leading and sometimes being led, and we will celebrate our efforts. We'll focus on this in the White House and within the Cabinet agencies. I will connect with the people and the programs that shine brightly, and I will urge every member of my administration to get involved. The old ideas are new again because they aren’t outdated; they’re timeless: duty, sacrifice, commitment, and a patriotism that shows itself in participating and contributing.

We need a new engagement, too, between the Executive and the Congress. The challenges before us will be thrashed out with the House and the Senate. We must bring the Federal budget into balance. And we must ensure that America stands before the world united, strong, at peace, and fiscally sound. But, of course, things may be difficult. We need compromise; we have had dissension. We need harmony; we have had a chorus of discordant voices.

We need a new partnership between the Executive and Congress. The challenges ahead will be worked out with the House and the Senate. We must balance the federal budget. And we must ensure that America presents itself to the world as united, strong, peaceful, and financially stable. But, of course, things may be tough. We need compromise; there has been disagreement. We need harmony; we have heard a chorus of conflicting voices.

For Congress, too, has changed in our time. There has grown a certain divisiveness. We have seen the hard looks and heard the statements in which not each other's ideas are challenged, but each other's motives. And our great parties have too often been far apart and untrusting of each other. It has been this way since Vietnam. That war cleaves us still. But, friends, that war began in earnest a quarter of a century ago; and surely the statute of limitations has been reached. This is a fact: The final lesson of Vietnam is that no great nation can long afford to be sundered by a memory. A new breeze is blowing, and the old bipartisanship must be made new again.

For Congress has also changed in our time. There's a certain level of divisiveness. We’ve seen the cold stares and heard the comments where it’s not just each other's ideas that are questioned, but each other's motives. Our major parties have often been far apart and distrustful of one another. This has been the case since Vietnam. That war still divides us. But, friends, that war officially started a quarter of a century ago; surely the statute of limitations has run out. The truth is: The lasting lesson of Vietnam is that no great nation can afford to be split apart by memories for too long. A new wind is blowing, and we need to revive the spirit of bipartisanship.

To my friends—and yes, I do mean friends—in the loyal opposition—and yes, I mean loyal: I put out my hand. I am putting out my hand to you, Mr. Speaker. I am putting out my hand to you Mr. Majority Leader. For this is the thing: This is the age of the offered hand. We can't turn back clocks, and I don't want to. But when our fathers were young, Mr. Speaker, our differences ended at the water's edge. And we don't wish to turn back time, but when our mothers were young, Mr. Majority Leader, the Congress and the Executive were capable of working together to produce a budget on which this nation could live. Let us negotiate soon and hard. But in the end, let us produce. The American people await action. They didn't send us here to bicker. They ask us to rise above the merely partisan. "In crucial things, unity"—and this, my friends, is crucial.

To my friends—and yes, I mean friends—in the loyal opposition—and yes, I mean loyal: I reach out to you. I'm extending my hand to you, Mr. Speaker. I'm reaching out to you, Mr. Majority Leader. The truth is: This is the time for cooperation. We can't turn back the clock, and I don't want to. But when our fathers were young, Mr. Speaker, our differences stopped at the border. And we don’t want to go back in time, but when our mothers were young, Mr. Majority Leader, Congress and the Executive worked together to create a budget that this nation could support. Let’s negotiate soon and seriously. But in the end, let’s deliver results. The American people are waiting for action. They didn't send us here to argue. They expect us to rise above party lines. "In crucial things, unity"—and this, my friends, is crucial.

To the world, too, we offer new engagement and a renewed vow: We will stay strong to protect the peace. The "offered hand" is a reluctant fist; but once made, strong, and can be used with great effect. There are today Americans who are held against their will in foreign lands, and Americans who are unaccounted for. Assistance can be shown here, and will be long remembered. Good will begets good will. Good faith can be a spiral that endlessly moves on.

To the world, we also extend a new commitment and a refreshed promise: We will remain strong in our effort to maintain peace. The "offered hand" may seem like a reluctant fist; but once it's formed, it's powerful and can be very effective. There are Americans today who are being held against their will in other countries, as well as Americans who are missing. We can provide help in these situations, and it will be remembered for a long time. Good actions lead to more good actions. Genuine goodwill can create an ongoing cycle of positivity.

Great nations like great men must keep their word. When America says something, America means it, whether a treaty or an agreement or a vow made on marble steps. We will always try to speak clearly, for candor is a compliment, but subtlety, too, is good and has its place. While keeping our alliances and friendships around the world strong, ever strong, we will continue the new closeness with the Soviet Union, consistent both with our security and with progress. One might say that our new relationship in part reflects the triumph of hope and strength over experience. But hope is good, and so are strength and vigilance.

Great nations, like great individuals, must honor their commitments. When America makes a statement, it stands by it, whether it's a treaty, an agreement, or a promise made on grand steps. We will always strive for clarity, as honesty is a virtue, but subtlety has its own importance and place. While we strengthen our alliances and friendships globally, we will also nurture our new connection with the Soviet Union, aligning with both our security and progress. One might say that this new relationship partly represents the victory of hope and strength over past experiences. But hope is valuable, as are strength and vigilance.

Here today are tens of thousands of our citizens who feel the understandable satisfaction of those who have taken part in democracy and seen their hopes fulfilled. But my thoughts have been turning the past few days to those who would be watching at home to an older fellow who will throw a salute by himself when the flag goes by, and the women who will tell her sons the words of the battle hymns. I don't mean this to be sentimental. I mean that on days like this, we remember that we are all part of a continuum, inescapably connected by the ties that bind.

Here today are tens of thousands of our citizens who feel the well-deserved satisfaction that comes from participating in democracy and seeing their hopes come to life. But I've been thinking over the past few days about those who are watching from home, like an older man giving a solitary salute as the flag passes by and the women who will share the words of the battle hymns with their sons. I'm not trying to be overly sentimental. I mean that on days like this, we recognize that we’re all part of a continuum, inextricably linked by the bonds that connect us.

Our children are watching in schools throughout our great land. And to them I say, thank you for watching democracy's big day. For democracy belongs to us all, and freedom is like a beautiful kite that can go higher and higher with the breeze. And to all I say: No matter what your circumstances or where you are, you are part of this day, you are part of the life of our great nation.

Our kids are watching in schools all over our amazing country. And to them I say, thank you for tuning in to democracy's big day. Democracy is for all of us, and freedom is like a beautiful kite that can soar higher and higher with the wind. And to everyone, I say: No matter your situation or where you are, you are part of this day, you are part of the life of our great nation.

A President is neither prince nor pope, and I don't seek a window on men's souls. In fact, I yearn for a greater tolerance, an easy-goingness about each other's attitudes and way of life.

A President is neither a prince nor a pope, and I don't want to pry into people's souls. In fact, I long for more tolerance and a laid-back attitude towards each other's beliefs and lifestyles.

There are few clear areas in which we as a society must rise up united and express our intolerance. The most obvious now is drugs. And when that first cocaine was smuggled in on a ship, it may as well have been a deadly bacteria, so much has it hurt the body, the soul of our country. And there is much to be done and to be said, but take my word for it: This scourge will stop.

There are a few clear areas where we as a society need to come together and show our intolerance. The most obvious one right now is drugs. When that first shipment of cocaine was brought in on a ship, it might as well have been a deadly virus, considering how much it has harmed the body and the spirit of our country. There’s a lot of work to be done and much to say, but believe me: This plague will come to an end.

And so, there is much to do; and tomorrow the work begins. I do not mistrust the future; I do not fear what is ahead. For our problems are large, but our heart is larger. Our challenges are great, but our will is greater. And if our flaws are endless, God's love is truly boundless.

And so, there’s a lot to do, and tomorrow the work starts. I don’t doubt the future; I’m not afraid of what’s coming. Our problems are big, but our hearts are bigger. Our challenges are significant, but our determination is stronger. And even if our flaws are countless, God’s love is truly limitless.

Some see leadership as high drama, and the sound of trumpets calling, and sometimes it is that. But I see history as a book with many pages, and each day we fill a page with acts of hopefulness and meaning. The new breeze blows, a page turns, the story unfolds. And so today a chapter begins, a small and stately story of unity, diversity, and generosity—shared, and written, together.

Some people view leadership as a grand performance, complete with the sound of trumpets, and sometimes it really is like that. But I see history as a book with many pages, and every day we write a new page filled with hope and significance. A fresh breeze comes in, a page turns, and the story develops. So today, a chapter starts—a simple yet dignified story of unity, diversity, and generosity—shared and written together.

Thank you. God bless you and God bless the United States of America.

Thank you. God bless you and God bless the USA.






WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JANUARY 20, 1993


My fellow citizens:

My fellow citizens:

Today we celebrate the mystery of American renewal.

Today we celebrate the mystery of American renewal.

This ceremony is held in the depth of winter, but by the words we speak and the faces we show the world, we force the spring. A spring reborn in the world's oldest democracy, that brings forth the vision and courage to reinvent America. When our founders boldly declared America's independence to the world, and our purposes to the Almighty, they knew that America, to endure, would have to change. Not change for change sake, but change to preserve America's ideals: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.

This ceremony takes place in the heart of winter, but through the words we share and the faces we present to the world, we create our own spring. A spring renewed in the world's oldest democracy, bringing forth the vision and courage to redefine America. When our founders confidently proclaimed America's independence to the world and stated our purposes to the Almighty, they understood that for America to endure, it would need to change. Not change for the sake of change, but change to uphold America's ideals: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Though we march to the music of our time, our mission is timeless. Each generation of American's must define what it means to be an American. On behalf of our nation, I salute my predecessor, President Bush, for his half-century of service to America...and I thank the millions of men and women whose steadfastness and sacrifice triumphed over depression, fascism and communism.

Though we move to the rhythm of our time, our mission remains ageless. Every generation of Americans must determine what it means to be an American. On behalf of our country, I honor my predecessor, President Bush, for his fifty years of service to America...and I thank the millions of men and women whose dedication and sacrifice overcame depression, fascism, and communism.

Today, a generation raised in the shadows of the Cold War assumes new responsibilities in a world warmed by the sunshine of freedom, but threatened still by ancient hatreds and new plagues. Raised in unrivalled prosperity, we inherit an economy that is still the world's strongest, but is weakened by business failures, stagnant wages, increasing inequality, and deep divisions among *our own* people.

Today, a generation grown up during the Cold War is taking on new responsibilities in a world that enjoys the warmth of freedom but is still facing old hatreds and new challenges. Raised in unmatched prosperity, we inherit an economy that remains the strongest in the world, yet it is affected by business failures, stagnant wages, growing inequality, and significant divisions among our own people.

When George Washington first took the oath I have just sworn to uphold, news travelled slowly across the land by horseback, and across the ocean by boat. Now the sights and sounds of this ceremony are broadcast instantaneously to billions around the world. Communications and commerce are global. Investment is mobile. Technology is almost magical, and ambition for a better life is now universal.

When George Washington first took the oath I just swore to uphold, news traveled slowly across the country by horseback and across the ocean by boat. Now, the sights and sounds of this ceremony are broadcast instantly to billions around the world. Communication and commerce are global. Investment is mobile. Technology seems almost magical, and the desire for a better life is now universal.

We earn our livelihood in America today in peaceful competition with people all across the Earth. Profound and powerful forces are shaking and remaking our world, and the *urgent* question of our time is whether we can make change our friend and not our enemy. This new world has already enriched the lives of *millions* of Americans who are able to compete and win in it. But when most people are working harder for less, when others cannot work at all, when the cost of health care devastates families and threatens to bankrupt our enterprises, great and small; when the fear of crime robs law abiding citizens of their freedom; and when millions of poor children cannot even imagine the lives we are calling them to lead, we have not made change our friend.

We earn our living in America today through healthy competition with people from all over the world. Powerful forces are shaking up our world, and the crucial question of our time is whether we can make change our ally instead of our foe. This new world has already improved the lives of millions of Americans who can compete and succeed in it. But when most people are working harder for less, when others can't find work at all, when the cost of healthcare devastates families and threatens to bankrupt our businesses, big and small; when the fear of crime takes away the freedom of law-abiding citizens; and when millions of underprivileged children can't even picture the lives we want for them, we've failed to make change our ally.

We know we have to face hard truths and take strong steps, but we have not done so. Instead we have drifted, and that drifting has eroded our resources, fractured our economy, and shaken our confidence. Though our challenges are fearsome, so are our strengths. Americans have ever been a restless, questing, hopeful people, and we must bring to our task today the vision and will of those who came before us. From our Revolution to the Civil War, to the Great Depression, to the Civil Rights movement, our people have always mustered the determination to construct from these crises the pillars of our history. Thomas Jefferson believed that to preserve the very foundations of our nation we would need dramatic change from time to time. Well, my fellow Americans, this is OUR time. Let us embrace it.

We know we have to confront tough realities and take decisive action, but we haven't done that. Instead, we've been drifting, and that drifting has weakened our resources, fractured our economy, and shaken our confidence. While our challenges are daunting, so are our strengths. Americans have always been a restless, seeking, hopeful people, and we need to approach our task today with the vision and determination of those who came before us. From our Revolution to the Civil War, the Great Depression, and the Civil Rights movement, our people have always found the resolve to build from these crises the foundations of our history. Thomas Jefferson believed that to maintain the very core of our nation, we would need significant change from time to time. Well, my fellow Americans, this is OUR time. Let's embrace it.

Our democracy must be not only the envy of the world but the engine of our *own* renewal. There is nothing *wrong* with America that cannot be cured by what is *right* with America.

Our democracy should be not just the envy of the world but also the driving force behind our *own* renewal. There’s nothing *wrong* with America that can’t be fixed by what is *right* with America.

And so today we pledge an end to the era of deadlock and drift, and a new season of American renewal has begun.

And so today we commit to ending the era of stalemate and uncertainty, and a new period of American renewal has started.

To renew America we must be bold. We must do what no generation has had to do before. We must invest more in our own people, in their jobs, and in their future, and at the same time cut our massive debt...and we must do so in a world in which we must compete for every opportunity. It will not be easy. It will require sacrifice, but it can be done, and done fairly. Not choosing sacrifice for its own sake, but for *our* own sake. We must provide for our nation the way a family provides for its children. Our founders saw themselves in the light of posterity. We can do no less. Anyone who has ever watched a child's eyes wander into sleep knows what posterity is. Posterity is the world to come, the world for whom we hold our ideals, from whom we have borrowed our planet, and to whom we bear sacred responsibilities. We must do what America does best, offer more opportunity TO all and demand more responsibility *from* all.

To renew America, we need to be bold. We have to do what no generation has had to do before. We must invest more in our people, in their jobs, and in their future, while also reducing our massive debt...and we have to do this in a world where we need to compete for every opportunity. It won’t be easy. It will require sacrifice, but it’s achievable, and it can be done fairly. We’re not choosing sacrifice for the sake of it, but for *our* own sake. We need to support our nation like a family supports its children. Our founders envisioned themselves in the context of future generations. We must do no less. Anyone who has ever watched a child drift off to sleep knows what future generations mean. Future generations are the world to come, the ones for whom we uphold our ideals, from whom we have borrowed our planet, and to whom we owe sacred responsibilities. We need to do what America does best—offer more opportunity TO everyone and demand more responsibility *from* everyone.

It is time to break the bad habit of expecting something for nothing: from our government, or from each other. Let us all take more responsibility, not only for ourselves and our families, but for our communities and our country. To renew America we must revitalize our democracy. This beautiful capitol, like every capitol since the dawn of civilization, is often a place of intrigue and calculation. Powerful people maneuver for position and worry endlessly about who is *in* and who is *out*, who is *up* and who is *down*, forgetting those people whose toil and sweat sends us here and paves our way.

It's time to stop the bad habit of expecting something for nothing—from our government or from each other. Let's all take more responsibility, not just for ourselves and our families, but for our communities and our country. To renew America, we need to revitalize our democracy. This beautiful capitol, like every capitol throughout history, is often a place of intrigue and strategy. Powerful individuals compete for influence and constantly worry about who's *in* and who's *out*, who's *up* and who's *down*, forgetting the people whose hard work and dedication bring us here and pave the way for us.

Americans deserve better, and in this city today there are people who want to do better, and so I say to all of you here, let us resolve to reform our politics, so that power and privilege no longer shout down the voice of the people. Let us put aside personal advantage, so that we can feel the pain and see the promise of America. Let us resolve to make our government a place for what Franklin Roosevelt called "bold, persistent experimentation, a government for our tomorrows, not our yesterdays." Let us give this capitol back to the people to whom it belongs.

Americans deserve better, and today in this city, there are people who want to improve things. So I say to all of you here, let’s commit to reforming our politics so that power and privilege no longer drown out the voice of the people. Let’s set aside personal gain so we can truly feel the struggles and see the potential of America. Let’s pledge to make our government a place for what Franklin Roosevelt called "bold, persistent experimentation, a government for our tomorrows, not our yesterdays." Let’s return this Capitol to the people it belongs to.

To renew America we must meet challenges abroad, as well as at home. There is no longer a clear division between what is foreign and what is domestic. The world economy, the world environment, the world AIDS crisis, the world arms race: they affect us all. Today as an old order passes, the new world is more free, but less stable. Communism's collapse has called forth old animosities, and new dangers. Clearly, America must continue to lead the world we did so much to make. While America rebuilds at home, we will not shrink from the challenges nor fail to seize the opportunities of this new world. Together with our friends and allies, we will work together to shape change, lest it engulf us. When our vital interests are challenged, or the will and conscience of the international community is defied, we will act; with peaceful diplomacy whenever possible, with force when necessary. The brave Americans serving our nation today in the Persian Gulf, in Somalia, and wherever else they stand, are testament to our resolve, but our greatest strength is the power of our ideas, which are still new in many lands. Across the world, we see them embraced and we rejoice. Our hopes, our hearts, our hands, are with those on every continent, who are building democracy and freedom. Their cause is America's cause. The American people have summoned the change we celebrate today. You have raised your voices in an unmistakable chorus, you have cast your votes in historic numbers, you have changed the face of congress, the presidency, and the political process itself. Yes, *you*, my fellow Americans, have forced the spring. Now *we* must do the work the season demands. To that work I now turn with *all* the authority of my office. I ask the congress to join with me; but no president, no congress, no government can undertake *this* mission alone.

To renew America, we need to tackle challenges both abroad and at home. The line between foreign and domestic issues is no longer clear. Global economy, environment, the AIDS crisis, and the arms race affect us all. Today, as an old order fades, the new world is freer but less stable. The collapse of communism has brought up old conflicts and new threats. Clearly, America must keep leading the world we helped shape. As we rebuild at home, we won't shy away from challenges or miss the opportunities this new world presents. Alongside our friends and allies, we will work together to shape change instead of letting it swallow us. When our vital interests are threatened, or when the will and conscience of the international community is ignored, we will act; seeking peaceful diplomacy whenever we can, and using force when we must. The brave Americans serving our country today in the Persian Gulf, Somalia, and wherever else they are stationed show our determination, but our greatest strength comes from our ideas, which are still fresh in many places. Around the world, we see people embracing them, and we celebrate that. Our hopes, hearts, and hands are with those on every continent who are building democracy and freedom. Their struggle is our struggle. The American people have called for the change we celebrate today. You've raised your voices in a powerful chorus, cast your votes in record numbers, and transformed the face of Congress, the presidency, and the political process itself. Yes, *you*, my fellow Americans, have ignited the change. Now *we* must do the work this season demands. I now turn to that work with *all* the authority of my office. I ask Congress to join me; but no president, no Congress, no government can take on *this* mission alone.

My fellow Americans, you, too, must play your part in our renewal. I challenge a new generation of *young* Americans to a season of service, to act on your idealism, by helping troubled children, keeping company with those in need, reconnecting our torn communities. There is so much to be done. Enough, indeed, for millions of others who are still young in spirit, to give of themselves in service, too. In serving we recognize a simple, but powerful, truth: we need each other, and we must care for one another. Today we do more than celebrate America, we rededicate ourselves to the very idea of America, an idea born in revolution, and renewed through two centuries of challenge, an idea tempered by the knowledge that but for fate, we, the fortunate and the unfortunate, might have been each other; an idea ennobled by the faith that our nation can summon from its myriad diversity, the deepest measure of unity; an idea infused with the conviction that America's journey long, heroic journey must go forever upward.

My fellow Americans, you all need to play your part in our renewal. I challenge a new generation of young Americans to embark on a season of service, to act on your ideals by helping troubled children, supporting those in need, and reconnecting our fractured communities. There’s so much to be done. There’s enough for millions of others who still feel young at heart to contribute their time in service as well. In serving, we recognize a simple but powerful truth: we need each other, and we must care for one another. Today, we do more than celebrate America; we recommit ourselves to the very idea of America, an idea that was born in revolution and renewed through two centuries of challenges—an idea shaped by the understanding that, but for fate, we—both the fortunate and the unfortunate—might have been in each other's shoes; an idea elevated by the belief that our nation can draw from its rich diversity to achieve true unity; an idea filled with the conviction that America's long, heroic journey must continually strive to reach new heights.

And so, my fellow Americans, as we stand at the edge of the 21st Century, let us begin anew, with energy and hope, with faith and discipline, and let us work until our work is done. The Scripture says: "And let us not be weary in well-doing, for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not." From this joyful mountaintop of celebration we hear a call to service in the valley. We have heard the trumpets, we have changed the guard, and now each in our own way, and with God's help, we must answer the call.

And so, my fellow Americans, as we stand on the brink of the 21st Century, let’s start fresh, with energy and hope, with faith and discipline, and let’s work until our job is done. The Scripture says: "And let us not be weary in well-doing, for in due season we shall reap, if we don’t give up." From this joyful peak of celebration, we hear a call to serve in the valley. We’ve heard the trumpets, we’ve changed the guard, and now each of us, in our own way and with God’s help, must respond to the call.

Thank you, and God bless you all.

Thank you, and may God bless you all.






WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

JANUARY 20, 1997

My fellow citizens:

My fellow citizens:

At this last presidential inauguration of the 20th century, let us lift our eyes toward the challenges that await us in the next century. It is our great good fortune that time and chance have put us not only at the edge of a new century, in a new millennium, but on the edge of a bright new prospect in human affairs—a moment that will define our course, and our character, for decades to come. We must keep our old democracy forever young. Guided by the ancient vision of a promised land, let us set our sights upon a land of new promise.

At this last presidential inauguration of the 20th century, let’s look forward to the challenges that lie ahead in the next century. We’re incredibly fortunate that time and chance have placed us not just at the beginning of a new century, in a new millennium, but at the brink of a bright new possibility in human affairs—a moment that will shape our direction and our identity for years to come. We need to keep our democracy fresh and vibrant. Inspired by the timeless vision of a promised land, let’s focus on a land of new possibilities.

The promise of America was born in the 18th century out of the bold conviction that we are all created equal. It was extended and preserved in the 19th century, when our nation spread across the continent, saved the union, and abolished the awful scourge of slavery.

The idea of America began in the 18th century with the strong belief that everyone is created equal. It continued and was safeguarded in the 19th century, as our nation expanded across the continent, preserved the union, and put an end to the terrible burden of slavery.

Then, in turmoil and triumph, that promise exploded onto the world stage to make this the American Century.

Then, in chaos and victory, that promise burst onto the global scene to make this the American Century.

And what a century it has been. America became the world's mightiest industrial power; saved the world from tyranny in two world wars and a long cold war; and time and again, reached out across the globe to millions who, like us, longed for the blessings of liberty.

And what a century it has been. America became the world's strongest industrial power; rescued the world from tyranny in two world wars and a long cold war; and time and again, extended a hand across the globe to millions who, like us, yearned for the gifts of freedom.

Along the way, Americans produced a great middle class and security in old age; built unrivaled centers of learning and opened public schools to all; split the atom and explored the heavens; invented the computer and the microchip; and deepened the wellspring of justice by making a revolution in civil rights for African Americans and all minorities, and extending the circle of citizenship, opportunity and dignity to women.

Along the way, Americans created a strong middle class and provided security in old age; established unmatched centers of learning and made public schools accessible to everyone; split the atom and explored space; invented the computer and the microchip; and advanced the cause of justice by launching a civil rights revolution for African Americans and all minorities, as well as expanding the circle of citizenship, opportunity, and dignity for women.

Now, for the third time, a new century is upon us, and another time to choose. We began the 19th century with a choice, to spread our nation from coast to coast. We began the 20th century with a choice, to harness the Industrial Revolution to our values of free enterprise, conservation, and human decency. Those choices made all the difference. At the dawn of the 21st century a free people must now choose to shape the forces of the Information Age and the global society, to unleash the limitless potential of all our people, and, yes, to form a more perfect union.

Now, for the third time, a new century is here, and it’s time to make another choice. We started the 19th century with the decision to expand our nation from coast to coast. We began the 20th century with the decision to align the Industrial Revolution with our values of free enterprise, conservation, and human decency. Those choices made a huge impact. As we enter the 21st century, a free people must now decide how to shape the forces of the Information Age and global society, to unlock the endless potential of all our people, and, yes, to create a more perfect union.

When last we gathered, our march to this new future seemed less certain than it does today. We vowed then to set a clear course to renew our nation.

When we last met, our journey to this new future felt less secure than it does now. We promised to create a clear plan to revitalize our nation.

In these four years, we have been touched by tragedy, exhilarated by challenge, strengthened by achievement. America stands alone as the world's indispensable nation. Once again, our economy is the strongest on Earth. Once again, we are building stronger families, thriving communities, better educational opportunities, a cleaner environment. Problems that once seemed destined to deepen now bend to our efforts: our streets are safer and record numbers of our fellow citizens have moved from welfare to work.

In these four years, we've experienced tragedy, felt exhilarated by challenges, and become stronger through our achievements. America stands out as the world's essential nation. Yet again, our economy is the strongest on the planet. Once more, we're creating stronger families, thriving communities, better educational opportunities, and a cleaner environment. Issues that once seemed impossible to overcome are now responding to our efforts: our streets are safer, and record numbers of our fellow citizens have transitioned from welfare to work.

And once again, we have resolved for our time a great debate over the role of government. Today we can declare: Government is not the problem, and government is not the solution. We—the American people—we are the solution. Our founders understood that well and gave us a democracy strong enough to endure for centuries, flexible enough to face our common challenges and advance our common dreams in each new day.

And once again, we have settled a significant debate about the role of government in our time. Today we can say: Government isn’t the problem, and it isn’t the solution either. We—the American people—we are the solution. Our founders understood this well and created a democracy that is strong enough to last for centuries, flexible enough to tackle our shared challenges and pursue our collective dreams every day.

As times change, so government must change. We need a new government for a new century—humble enough not to try to solve all our problems for us, but strong enough to give us the tools to solve our problems for ourselves; a government that is smaller, lives within its means, and does more with less. Yet where it can stand up for our values and interests in the world, and where it can give Americans the power to make a real difference in their everyday lives, government should do more, not less. The preeminent mission of our new government is to give all Americans an opportunity—not a guarantee, but a real opportunity—to build better lives.

As times change, so must the government. We need a new government for a new century—one that is humble enough not to attempt to solve all our problems, but strong enough to provide us with the tools to solve our own issues; a government that is smaller, lives within its means, and accomplishes more with less. However, where it can advocate for our values and interests globally, and empower Americans to make a real difference in their daily lives, the government should do more, not less. The primary mission of our new government is to give all Americans an opportunity—not a guarantee, but a genuine opportunity—to build better lives.

Beyond that, my fellow citizens, the future is up to us. Our founders taught us that the preservation of our liberty and our union depends upon responsible citizenship. And we need a new sense of responsibility for a new century. There is work to do, work that government alone cannot do: teaching children to read; hiring people off welfare rolls; coming out from behind locked doors and shuttered windows to help reclaim our streets from drugs and gangs and crime; taking time out of our own lives to serve others.

Beyond that, my fellow citizens, the future is in our hands. Our founders taught us that safeguarding our freedom and unity relies on being responsible citizens. We need a fresh sense of responsibility for a new century. There’s work to be done, work that government alone can't achieve: teaching kids how to read; helping people get off welfare; stepping out from behind closed doors and shut windows to help take back our streets from drugs, gangs, and crime; and making time in our lives to serve others.

Each and every one of us, in our own way, must assume personal responsibility—not only for ourselves and our families, but for our neighbors and our nation. Our greatest responsibility is to embrace a new spirit of community for a new century. For any one of us to succeed, we must succeed as one America.

Each of us, in our own way, needs to take personal responsibility—not just for ourselves and our families, but also for our neighbors and our country. Our biggest responsibility is to adopt a new sense of community for a new era. For any of us to succeed, we have to succeed as one America.

The challenge of our past remains the challenge of our future—will we be one nation, one people, with one common destiny, or not? Will we all come together, or come apart?

The challenge from our past is still the challenge for our future—will we be one nation, one people, with one shared destiny, or not? Will we unite, or will we divide?

The divide of race has been America's constant curse. And each new wave of immigrants gives new targets to old prejudices. Prejudice and contempt, cloaked in the pretense of religious or political conviction are no different. These forces have nearly destroyed our nation in the past. They plague us still. They fuel the fanaticism of terror. And they torment the lives of millions in fractured nations all around the world.

The divide of race has always been America's ongoing curse. Every new wave of immigrants becomes a target for old prejudices. Prejudice and disdain, disguised as religious or political beliefs, are no different. These forces have nearly torn our nation apart in the past. They continue to trouble us. They drive the fanaticism of terror. And they cause suffering for millions in broken nations all around the world.

These obsessions cripple both those who hate and, of course, those who are hated, robbing both of what they might become. We cannot, we will not, succumb to the dark impulses that lurk in the far regions of the soul everywhere. We shall overcome them. And we shall replace them with the generous spirit of a people who feel at home with one another.

These obsessions weaken both those who hate and those who are hated, taking away from both what they could potentially become. We can't, and we won't, give in to the dark urges that hide in the depths of the soul everywhere. We will rise above them. And we will replace them with the generous spirit of a people who feel comfortable with one another.

Our rich texture of racial, religious and political diversity will be a Godsend in the 21st century. Great rewards will come to those who can live together, learn together, work together, forge new ties that bind together.

Our diverse mix of races, religions, and political views will be a blessing in the 21st century. Those who can live, learn, work, and create new connections together will reap great rewards.

As this new era approaches we can already see its broad outlines. Ten years ago, the Internet was the mystical province of physicists; today, it is a commonplace encyclopedia for millions of schoolchildren. Scientists now are decoding the blueprint of human life. Cures for our most feared illnesses seem close at hand.

As this new era approaches, we can already see its clear outlines. Ten years ago, the Internet was the mysterious realm of physicists; today, it’s an everyday resource for millions of schoolchildren. Scientists are now figuring out the blueprint of human life. Cures for our most dreaded diseases seem just around the corner.

The world is no longer divided into two hostile camps. Instead, now we are building bonds with nations that once were our adversaries. Growing connections of commerce and culture give us a chance to lift the fortunes and spirits of people the world over. And for the very first time in all of history, more people on this planet live under democracy than dictatorship.

The world isn't split into two opposing sides anymore. Instead, we’re forming connections with countries that used to be our enemies. Increasing trade and cultural ties give us the opportunity to improve the livelihoods and well-being of people around the globe. And for the first time in history, more people on this planet live in democracies than under dictatorships.

My fellow Americans, as we look back at this remarkable century, we may ask, can we hope not just to follow, but even to surpass the achievements of the 20th century in America and to avoid the awful bloodshed that stained its legacy? To that question, every American here and every American in our land today must answer a resounding "Yes."

My fellow Americans, as we reflect on this incredible century, we might wonder if we can not only keep up with but even exceed the accomplishments of the 20th century in America and steer clear of the horrific violence that marred its history. To that question, every American here and all Americans throughout our country today must respond with a strong "Yes."

This is the heart of our task. With a new vision of government, a new sense of responsibility, a new spirit of community, we will sustain America's journey. The promise we sought in a new land we will find again in a land of new promise.

This is the core of what we need to do. With a fresh perspective on government, a renewed sense of responsibility, and a stronger sense of community, we will keep America moving forward. The opportunity we looked for in this new land, we will discover once more in a land filled with new possibilities.

In this new land, education will be every citizen's most prized possession. Our schools will have the highest standards in the world, igniting the spark of possibility in the eyes of every girl and every boy. And the doors of higher education will be open to all. The knowledge and power of the Information Age will be within reach not just of the few, but of every classroom, every library, every child. Parents and children will have time not only to work, but to read and play together. And the plans they make at their kitchen table will be those of a better home, a better job, the certain chance to go to college.

In this new land, education will be every citizen's most valued asset. Our schools will set the highest standards in the world, sparking the potential in the eyes of every girl and boy. The doors to higher education will be open to everyone. The knowledge and advantages of the Information Age will be accessible not just to a select few, but to every classroom, every library, every child. Parents and children will have time not only to work, but also to read and play together. The plans they make at their kitchen table will focus on creating a better home, a better job, and a real opportunity to go to college.

Our streets will echo again with the laughter of our children, because no one will try to shoot them or sell them drugs anymore. Everyone who can work, will work, with today's permanent under class part of tomorrow's growing middle class. New miracles of medicine at last will reach not only those who can claim care now, but the children and hardworking families too long denied.

Our streets will once again be filled with the laughter of our children because no one will attempt to shoot them or sell them drugs anymore. Everyone who is able to work will have a job, with today’s permanent underclass becoming part of tomorrow’s expanding middle class. New medical breakthroughs will finally benefit not just those who can access care now, but also the children and hardworking families who have been denied for far too long.

We will stand mighty for peace and freedom, and maintain a strong defense against terror and destruction. Our children will sleep free from the threat of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. Ports and airports, farms and factories will thrive with trade and innovation and ideas. And the world's greatest democracy will lead a whole world of democracies.

We will stand strong for peace and freedom, and maintain a solid defense against terror and destruction. Our children will sleep without the fear of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. Ports and airports, farms and factories will prosper with trade, innovation, and new ideas. And the world's greatest democracy will lead a global community of democracies.

Our land of new promise will be a nation that meets its obligations—a nation that balances its budget, but never loses the balance of its values. A nation where our grandparents have secure retirement and health care, and their grandchildren know we have made the reforms necessary to sustain those benefits for their time. A nation that fortifies the world's most productive economy even as it protects the great natural bounty of our water, air, and majestic land.

Our country of new possibilities will be a nation that fulfills its responsibilities—a nation that balances its budget but never compromises its values. A nation where our grandparents have dependable retirement and healthcare, and their grandchildren know we’ve made the necessary changes to maintain those benefits for their future. A nation that strengthens the world’s most productive economy while also safeguarding our abundant natural resources like water, air, and beautiful land.

And in this land of new promise, we will have reformed our politics so that the voice of the people will always speak louder than the din of narrow interests—regaining the participation and deserving the trust of all Americans.

And in this land of new opportunities, we will have changed our politics so that the voice of the people will always be heard above the noise of special interests—regaining participation and earning the trust of all Americans.

Fellow citizens, let us build that America, a nation ever moving forward toward realizing the full potential of all its citizens. Prosperity and power—yes, they are important, and we must maintain them. But let us never forget: The greatest progress we have made, and the greatest progress we have yet to make, is in the human heart. In the end, all the world's wealth and a thousand armies are no match for the strength and decency of the human spirit.

Fellow citizens, let’s create that America, a nation that’s always progressing toward realizing the full potential of all its people. Prosperity and power—sure, they’re important, and we need to uphold them. But let’s never forget: The most significant progress we’ve made, and the most significant progress still to come, lies in the human heart. In the end, all the wealth in the world and a thousand armies can’t compare to the strength and goodness of the human spirit.

Thirty-four years ago, the man whose life we celebrate today spoke to us down there, at the other end of this Mall, in words that moved the conscience of a nation. Like a prophet of old, he told of his dream that one day America would rise up and treat all its citizens as equals before the law and in the heart. Martin Luther King's dream was the American Dream. His quest is our quest: the ceaseless striving to live out our true creed. Our history has been built on such dreams and labors. And by our dreams and labors we will redeem the promise of America in the 21st century.

Thirty-four years ago, the man we’re honoring today spoke to us down there, at the other end of this Mall, in words that inspired the conscience of a nation. Like an old prophet, he shared his dream that one day America would rise up and treat all its citizens as equals before the law and in the heart. Martin Luther King's dream was the American Dream. His quest is our quest: the ongoing effort to truly live out our values. Our history has been shaped by such dreams and hard work. And through our dreams and efforts, we will fulfill the promise of America in the 21st century.

To that effort I pledge all my strength and every power of my office. I ask the members of Congress here to join in that pledge. The American people returned to office a President of one party and a Congress of another. Surely, they did not do this to advance the politics of petty bickering and extreme partisanship they plainly deplore. No, they call on us instead to be repairers of the breach, and to move on with America's mission.

To that effort, I commit all my strength and every ability of my position. I encourage the members of Congress here to join in that commitment. The American people elected a President from one party and a Congress from another. Clearly, they didn't do this to promote the politics of petty disagreements and extreme partisanship that they obviously reject. No, they instead expect us to be healers of divisions and to continue with America's mission.

America demands and deserves big things from us—and nothing big ever came from being small. Let us remember the timeless wisdom of Cardinal Bernardin, when facing the end of his own life. He said:

America demands and deserves great things from us—and nothing great ever came from being small. Let us remember the timeless wisdom of Cardinal Bernardin when he was facing the end of his life. He said:

"It is wrong to waste the precious gift of time, on acrimony and division."

"It’s a waste of the precious gift of time to focus on bitterness and division."

Fellow citizens, we must not waste the precious gift of this time. For all of us are on that same journey of our lives, and our journey, too, will come to an end. But the journey of our America must go on.

Fellow citizens, we should not take for granted this valuable time we have. We are all on the same path of life, and our individual journeys will eventually come to an end. However, the journey of our America must continue.

And so, my fellow Americans, we must be strong, for there is much to dare. The demands of our time are great and they are different. Let us meet them with faith and courage, with patience and a grateful and happy heart. Let us shape the hope of this day into the noblest chapter in our history. Yes, let us build our bridge. A bridge wide enough and strong enough for every American to cross over to a blessed land of new promise.

And so, my fellow Americans, we need to be strong because there’s a lot at stake. The challenges we face today are significant and unique. Let’s tackle them with faith and courage, with patience and a grateful and joyful heart. Let’s turn the hope of today into the greatest chapter in our history. Yes, let’s build our bridge. A bridge that is wide and strong enough for every American to cross into a land of new promise.

May those generations whose faces we cannot yet see, whose names we may never know, say of us here that we led our beloved land into a new century with the American Dream alive for all her children; with the American promise of a more perfect union a reality for all her people; with America's bright flame of freedom spreading throughout all the world.

May the future generations, whose faces we can’t yet see and whose names we might never know, say of us that we guided our beloved country into a new century with the American Dream thriving for all its children; with the American promise of a more perfect union becoming a reality for all its people; and with America’s bright flame of freedom shining throughout the entire world.

From the height of this place and the summit of this century, let us go forth. May God strengthen our hands for the good work ahead—and always, always bless our America.

From the heights of this place and the peak of this century, let’s move forward. May God empower us for the good work ahead—and always, always bless our America.






GEORGE W. BUSH, FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS

FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 2001

President Clinton, distinguished guests and my fellow citizens, the peaceful transfer of authority is rare in history, yet common in our country. With a simple oath, we affirm old traditions and make new beginnings.

President Clinton, esteemed guests, and my fellow citizens, the peaceful transfer of power is rare in history, but common in our country. With a simple oath, we honor long-standing traditions and start new beginnings.

As I begin, I thank President Clinton for his service to our nation.

As I start, I want to thank President Clinton for his service to our country.

And I thank Vice President Gore for a contest conducted with spirit and ended with grace.

And I thank Vice President Gore for a spirited contest that concluded gracefully.

I am honored and humbled to stand here, where so many of America's leaders have come before me, and so many will follow.

I’m honored and humbled to be here, where so many of America’s leaders have stood before me, and so many will come after.

We have a place, all of us, in a long story—a story we continue, but whose end we will not see. It is the story of a new world that became a friend and liberator of the old, a story of a slave-holding society that became a servant of freedom, the story of a power that went into the world to protect but not possess, to defend but not to conquer.

We all have a part in a long story—a story we keep telling, but whose conclusion we won’t witness. It’s the story of a new world that became a friend and liberator to the old, a story of a society that held slaves but turned into a champion of freedom, the tale of a power that went out into the world to protect without taking over, to defend without conquering.

It is the American story—a story of flawed and fallible people, united across the generations by grand and enduring ideals.

It’s the American story—a story of imperfect and human people, united over the years by big and lasting ideals.

The grandest of these ideals is an unfolding American promise that everyone belongs, that everyone deserves a chance, that no insignificant person was ever born.

The greatest of these ideals is an emerging American promise that everyone belongs, that everyone deserves a chance, and that no one is ever insignificant.

Americans are called to enact this promise in our lives and in our laws. And though our nation has sometimes halted, and sometimes delayed, we must follow no other course.

Americans are urged to live out this promise in our lives and in our laws. And even though our nation has occasionally stopped or delayed, we must stick to this path.

Through much of the last century, America's faith in freedom and democracy was a rock in a raging sea. Now it is a seed upon the wind, taking root in many nations.

Through much of the last century, America's belief in freedom and democracy was a solid foundation in a turbulent sea. Now, it’s a seed carried by the wind, finding a place to grow in many countries.

Our democratic faith is more than the creed of our country, it is the inborn hope of our humanity, an ideal we carry but do not own, a trust we bear and pass along. And even after nearly 225 years, we have a long way yet to travel.

Our belief in democracy is more than just our country's principle; it's a deep-rooted hope for humanity, an ideal we uphold but don't fully possess, a responsibility we carry and share. Even after almost 225 years, we still have a long journey ahead.

While many of our citizens prosper, others doubt the promise, even the justice, of our own country. The ambitions of some Americans are limited by failing schools and hidden prejudice and the circumstances of their birth. And sometimes our differences run so deep, it seems we share a continent, but not a country.

While many of our citizens thrive, others question the promise, even the fairness, of our own country. The goals of some Americans are restricted by failing schools, hidden bias, and the conditions of their upbringing. And sometimes our differences are so profound that it feels like we share a continent but not a nation.

We do not accept this, and we will not allow it. Our unity, our union, is the serious work of leaders and citizens in every generation. And this is my solemn pledge: I will work to build a single nation of justice and opportunity.

We won't accept this, and we won’t let it happen. Our unity is the important effort of leaders and citizens in every generation. And this is my sincere promise: I will work to create one nation of justice and opportunity.

I know this is in our reach because we are guided by a power larger than ourselves who creates us equal in His image.

I know this is within our reach because we're guided by a power greater than ourselves that creates us equal in His image.

And we are confident in principles that unite and lead us onward.

And we believe in the principles that bring us together and guide us forward.

America has never been united by blood or birth or soil. We are bound by ideals that move us beyond our backgrounds, lift us above our interests and teach us what it means to be citizens. Every child must be taught these principles. Every citizen must uphold them. And every immigrant, by embracing these ideals, makes our country more, not less, American.

America has never been united by blood, birth, or land. We are connected by ideals that push us beyond our backgrounds, elevate us above our personal interests, and teach us what it means to be citizens. Every child needs to learn these principles. Every citizen must defend them. And every immigrant, by embracing these ideals, makes our country more American, not less.

Today, we affirm a new commitment to live out our nation's promise through civility, courage, compassion and character.

Today, we reaffirm our commitment to uphold our nation's promise by living with civility, courage, compassion, and integrity.

America, at its best, matches a commitment to principle with a concern for civility. A civil society demands from each of us good will and respect, fair dealing and forgiveness.

America, at its best, combines a commitment to principles with a focus on civility. A civil society requires each of us to show good will and respect, fair treatment, and forgiveness.

Some seem to believe that our politics can afford to be petty because, in a time of peace, the stakes of our debates appear small.

Some people think that our politics can be trivial because, in a time of peace, the issues we discuss seem minor.

But the stakes for America are never small. If our country does not lead the cause of freedom, it will not be led. If we do not turn the hearts of children toward knowledge and character, we will lose their gifts and undermine their idealism. If we permit our economy to drift and decline, the vulnerable will suffer most.

But the stakes for America are always high. If our country doesn't take the lead in promoting freedom, no one else will. If we don't inspire children to value knowledge and good character, we'll lose their potential and damage their idealism. If we allow our economy to weaken and decline, it's the most vulnerable who will suffer the most.

We must live up to the calling we share. Civility is not a tactic or a sentiment. It is the determined choice of trust over cynicism, of community over chaos. And this commitment, if we keep it, is a way to shared accomplishment.

We need to rise to the calling we all share. Being civil isn’t just a strategy or a feeling. It’s a conscious choice to trust instead of being cynical, to choose community over chaos. And if we stick to this commitment, it leads to shared success.

America, at its best, is also courageous.

America, at its best, is also brave.

Our national courage has been clear in times of depression and war, when defending common dangers defined our common good. Now we must choose if the example of our fathers and mothers will inspire us or condemn us. We must show courage in a time of blessing by confronting problems instead of passing them on to future generations.

Our national strength has been evident during tough times and wars, when protecting shared threats shaped our collective well-being. Now we have to decide if the legacy of our parents will motivate us or hold us back. We need to be brave during prosperous times by tackling issues head-on instead of pushing them onto future generations.

Together, we will reclaim America's schools, before ignorance and apathy claim more young lives.

Together, we will take back America's schools before ignorance and indifference take more young lives.

We will reform Social Security and Medicare, sparing our children from struggles we have the power to prevent. And we will reduce taxes, to recover the momentum of our economy and reward the effort and enterprise of working Americans.

We will improve Social Security and Medicare, protecting our children from challenges we can avoid. And we will lower taxes to boost our economy and recognize the hard work and initiative of everyday Americans.

We will build our defenses beyond challenge, lest weakness invite challenge.

We will strengthen our defenses to prevent any challenges, so that weakness doesn't attract an attack.

We will confront weapons of mass destruction, so that a new century is spared new horrors.

We will tackle weapons of mass destruction to ensure that a new century doesn't face new horrors.

The enemies of liberty and our country should make no mistake: America remains engaged in the world by history and by choice, shaping a balance of power that favors freedom. We will defend our allies and our interests. We will show purpose without arrogance. We will meet aggression and bad faith with resolve and strength. And to all nations, we will speak for the values that gave our nation birth.

The enemies of freedom and our country should understand this clearly: America is involved in the world out of both history and choice, creating a balance of power that supports freedom. We will protect our allies and our interests. We will act with determination but not arrogance. We will respond to aggression and dishonesty with strength and resolve. And to all nations, we will advocate for the values that founded our nation.

America, at its best, is compassionate. In the quiet of American conscience, we know that deep, persistent poverty is unworthy of our nation's promise.

America, at its best, is compassionate. In the quiet of American conscience, we know that deep, ongoing poverty is unworthy of our nation's promise.

And whatever our views of its cause, we can agree that children at risk are not at fault. Abandonment and abuse are not acts of God, they are failures of love.

And no matter what we think caused it, we can all agree that children at risk are not to blame. Abandonment and abuse aren’t acts of God; they’re failures of love.

And the proliferation of prisons, however necessary, is no substitute for hope and order in our souls.

And while the rise of prisons may be needed, it can't replace hope and order in our hearts.

Where there is suffering, there is duty. Americans in need are not strangers, they are citizens, not problems, but priorities. And all of us are diminished when any are hopeless.

Where there is suffering, there is responsibility. Americans in need are not strangers; they are citizens, not problems but priorities. And all of us are diminished when any of us feel hopeless.

Government has great responsibilities for public safety and public health, for civil rights and common schools. Yet compassion is the work of a nation, not just a government.

Government has significant responsibilities for public safety and health, civil rights, and public education. However, compassion is the duty of the nation as a whole, not just the government.

And some needs and hurts are so deep they will only respond to a mentor's touch or a pastor's prayer. Church and charity, synagogue and mosque lend our communities their humanity, and they will have an honored place in our plans and in our laws.

And some needs and pain are so profound they can only be addressed by a mentor's guidance or a pastor's prayer. Churches and charities, synagogues and mosques give our communities their sense of humanity, and they will hold a respected place in our plans and our laws.

Many in our country do not know the pain of poverty, but we can listen to those who do.

Many people in our country are unaware of the struggles of poverty, but we can listen to those who experience it.

And I can pledge our nation to a goal: When we see that wounded traveler on the road to Jericho, we will not pass to the other side.

And I can commit our nation to a purpose: When we come across that injured traveler on the road to Jericho, we won’t just walk by on the other side.

America, at its best, is a place where personal responsibility is valued and expected.

America, at its best, is a place where personal responsibility is valued and expected.

Encouraging responsibility is not a search for scapegoats, it is a call to conscience. And though it requires sacrifice, it brings a deeper fulfillment. We find the fullness of life not only in options, but in commitments. And we find that children and community are the commitments that set us free.

Encouraging responsibility isn’t about blaming others; it’s a call to our better selves. It may take some sacrifice, but it leads to a deeper sense of fulfillment. We discover the true richness of life not just in choices but in commitments. We realize that our commitments to children and community are what really set us free.

Our public interest depends on private character, on civic duty and family bonds and basic fairness, on uncounted, unhonored acts of decency which give direction to our freedom.

Our shared interests rely on individual character, civic responsibility, family connections, and fundamental fairness, on countless, unrecognized acts of kindness that guide our freedom.

Sometimes in life we are called to do great things. But as a saint of our times has said, every day we are called to do small things with great love. The most important tasks of a democracy are done by everyone.

Sometimes in life, we are asked to do amazing things. But as a modern-day saint has said, every day, we are called to do small things with great love. The most important tasks of a democracy are carried out by everyone.

I will live and lead by these principles: to advance my convictions with civility, to pursue the public interest with courage, to speak for greater justice and compassion, to call for responsibility and try to live it as well.

I will live and lead by these principles: to promote my beliefs with respect, to advocate for the public good with bravery, to stand up for greater justice and kindness, and to demand accountability while striving to embody it myself.

In all these ways, I will bring the values of our history to the care of our times.

In all these ways, I will apply the values of our history to the care of our times.

What you do is as important as anything government does. I ask you to seek a common good beyond your comfort; to defend needed reforms against easy attacks; to serve your nation, beginning with your neighbor. I ask you to be citizens: citizens, not spectators; citizens, not subjects; responsible citizens, building communities of service and a nation of character.

What you do is just as important as anything the government does. I urge you to pursue a common good beyond your comfort zone; to stand up for necessary reforms against simple criticism; to serve your country, starting with your neighbor. I ask you to be active citizens: citizens, not bystanders; citizens, not subjects; responsible citizens, creating communities of service and a nation of integrity.

Americans are generous and strong and decent, not because we believe in ourselves, but because we hold beliefs beyond ourselves. When this spirit of citizenship is missing, no government program can replace it. When this spirit is present, no wrong can stand against it.

Americans are generous, strong, and good, not just because we have faith in ourselves, but because we believe in something greater than ourselves. When this sense of citizenship is absent, no government program can make up for it. When this spirit is alive, no injustice can withstand it.

After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Virginia statesman John Page wrote to Thomas Jefferson: "We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?"

After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Virginia politician John Page wrote to Thomas Jefferson: "We know that the race isn't always won by the fastest nor the battle by the strongest. Don’t you think there's an angel riding in the whirlwind and guiding this storm?"

Much time has passed since Jefferson arrived for his inauguration. The years and changes accumulate. But the themes of this day he would know: our nation's grand story of courage and its simple dream of dignity.

A lot of time has gone by since Jefferson came for his inauguration. The years and changes keep piling up. But the themes of this day are ones he would recognize: our nation's powerful story of bravery and its straightforward dream of dignity.

We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet his purpose is achieved in our duty, and our duty is fulfilled in service to one another.

We are not the author of this story, who gives time and eternity their meaning. But his purpose is realized through our duty, and our duty is fulfilled by serving each other.

Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today, to make our country more just and generous, to affirm the dignity of our lives and every life.

Never getting tired, never giving up, never finishing, we renew that purpose today: to make our country fairer and more generous, to affirm the dignity of our lives and every life.

This work continues. This story goes on. And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.

This work goes on. This story continues. And an angel is still riding in the whirlwind and guiding this storm.

God bless you all, and God bless America.

God bless you all, and God bless the USA.






GEORGE W. BUSH, SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2005

Vice President Cheney, Mr. Chief Justice, President Carter, President Bush, President Clinton, reverend clergy, distinguished guests, fellow citizens:

Vice President Cheney, Chief Justice, President Carter, President Bush, President Clinton, esteemed clergy, honored guests, fellow citizens:

On this day, prescribed by law and marked by ceremony, we celebrate the durable wisdom of our Constitution, and recall the deep commitments that unite our country. I am grateful for the honor of this hour, mindful of the consequential times in which we live, and determined to fulfill the oath that I have sworn and you have witnessed.

On this day, designated by law and honored with ceremony, we celebrate the enduring wisdom of our Constitution and remember the strong commitments that bring our country together. I appreciate the privilege of being here, aware of the important times we live in, and committed to fulfilling the oath I have taken and that you have witnessed.

At this second gathering, our duties are defined not by the words I use, but by the history we have seen together. For a half century, America defended our own freedom by standing watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of communism came years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical—and then there came a day of fire.

At this second meeting, our responsibilities aren’t determined by my words, but by the history we’ve experienced together. For fifty years, America protected our freedom by keeping watch at faraway borders. After the collapse of communism, there were years of relative calm, years of rest, years of a break—and then came a day of fire.

We have seen our vulnerability—and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny—prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder—violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.

We’ve recognized our vulnerability—and we’ve identified its deepest source. As long as entire regions of the world remain filled with resentment and oppression—vulnerable to ideologies that promote hatred and justify violence—conflict will grow, become more destructive, cross even the most guarded borders, and pose a serious threat. The only force in history that can end the cycle of hatred and resentment, challenge the pretenses of tyrants, and fulfill the hopes of decent and tolerant people is the force of human freedom.

We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.

We are guided, by current events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of freedom in our country increasingly relies on the success of freedom in other countries. The best hope for peace globally is the spread of liberty everywhere.

America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation's security, and the calling of our time.

America's core interests and our deepest beliefs are now aligned. Since our founding, we have declared that every person on this planet has rights, dignity, and unparalleled worth because they are created in the image of the Maker of Heaven and Earth. Over the years, we have emphasized the need for self-government, as no one is meant to be a master and no one should be a slave. Promoting these ideals is the mission that established our Nation. It is the honorable legacy of our forefathers. Now, it is crucial for our nation's security and the duty of our time.

So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.

So the United States aims to encourage and support the development of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, ultimately striving to eliminate tyranny in our world.

This is not primarily the task of arms, though we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary. Freedom, by its nature, must be chosen, and defended by citizens, and sustained by the rule of law and the protection of minorities. And when the soul of a nation finally speaks, the institutions that arise may reflect customs and traditions very different from our own. America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling. Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom, and make their own way.

This isn't mainly about military action, although we will use force to protect ourselves and our allies if needed. Freedom inherently must be chosen, defended by citizens, and upheld by the rule of law and the protection of minorities. And when the spirit of a nation finally expresses itself, the institutions that emerge may reflect customs and traditions that are very different from ours. America won't impose our style of government on those who don't want it. Our aim is to help others discover their own voice, achieve their own freedom, and carve their own path.

The great objective of ending tyranny is the concentrated work of generations. The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it. America's influence is not unlimited, but fortunately for the oppressed, America's influence is considerable, and we will use it confidently in freedom's cause.

The main goal of ending oppression is the dedicated effort of many generations. The challenges involved don’t justify avoiding the task. America’s influence isn’t infinite, but luckily for those who suffer, America’s impact is significant, and we will use it boldly for the cause of freedom.

My most solemn duty is to protect this nation and its people against further attacks and emerging threats. Some have unwisely chosen to test America's resolve, and have found it firm.

My most important responsibility is to protect this country and its citizens from further attacks and new threats. Some have foolishly decided to challenge America's determination, and they've discovered it to be strong.

We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.

We will consistently highlight the choice in front of every leader and every nation: the moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is always right. America will not act like imprisoned dissenters prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and subservience, or that any person wants to live at the mercy of bullies.

We will encourage reform in other governments by making clear that success in our relations will require the decent treatment of their own people. America's belief in human dignity will guide our policies, yet rights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed. In the long run, there is no justice without freedom, and there can be no human rights without human liberty.

We will promote reform in other governments by making it clear that successful relations will depend on how they treat their own people. America's belief in human dignity will shape our policies, but rights must be more than reluctant concessions from dictators; they are guaranteed by free expression and the involvement of citizens. Ultimately, there is no justice without freedom, and there can be no human rights without human liberty.

Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty—though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt. Americans, of all people, should never be surprised by the power of our ideals. Eventually, the call of freedom comes to every mind and every soul. We do not accept the existence of permanent tyranny because we do not accept the possibility of permanent slavery. Liberty will come to those who love it.

Some people, I know, have questioned the worldwide appeal of freedom—yet this moment in history, four decades marked by the fastest progress in liberty ever witnessed, seems like a strange time for doubt. Americans, of all people, should never be taken aback by the strength of our ideals. In the end, the desire for freedom reaches every mind and every soul. We won't accept the idea of lasting tyranny because we refuse to accept the possibility of lasting oppression. Freedom will come to those who cherish it.

Today, America speaks anew to the peoples of the world:

Today, America communicates once again with the people of the world:

All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.

All people living under oppression and despair can be assured: the United States will not overlook your suffering or justify those who oppress you. When you fight for your freedom, we will be there to support you.

Democratic reformers facing repression, prison, or exile can know: America sees you for who you are: the future leaders of your free country.

Democratic reformers who are dealing with oppression, imprisonment, or exile can know this: America recognizes you for who you are: the future leaders of your free nation.

The rulers of outlaw regimes can know that we still believe as Abraham Lincoln did: "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."

The leaders of illegal regimes should know that we still believe, just like Abraham Lincoln: "Those who deny freedom to others don’t deserve it for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot keep it for long."

The leaders of governments with long habits of control need to know: To serve your people you must learn to trust them. Start on this journey of progress and justice, and America will walk at your side.

The leaders of governments that have been controlling for a long time need to understand: To truly serve your people, you have to learn to trust them. Begin this journey of progress and justice, and America will stand with you.

And all the allies of the United States can know: we honor your friendship, we rely on your counsel, and we depend on your help. Division among free nations is a primary goal of freedom's enemies. The concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy is a prelude to our enemies' defeat.

And all the allies of the United States should know: we value your friendship, we appreciate your advice, and we rely on your support. Division among free nations is a key objective of freedom's enemies. The united efforts of free nations to promote democracy are the first step toward defeating our enemies.

Today, I also speak anew to my fellow citizens:

Today, I'm speaking once again to my fellow citizens:

From all of you, I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill, and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well—a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power, it burns those who fight its progress, and one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.

From all of you, I have asked for patience in the challenging task of securing America, which you have given generously. Our country has taken on obligations that are tough to meet, and it would be wrong to walk away from them. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating spirit of this nation, tens of millions have gained their freedom. And as hope sparks hope, millions more will find it. Through our efforts, we have ignited a fire as well—a fire in the minds of people. It warms those who feel its strength, it burns those who resist its progress, and one day this wild fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.

A few Americans have accepted the hardest duties in this cause—in the quiet work of intelligence and diplomacy...the idealistic work of helping raise up free governments...the dangerous and necessary work of fighting our enemies. Some have shown their devotion to our country in deaths that honored their whole lives—and we will always honor their names and their sacrifice.

A few Americans have taken on the toughest responsibilities in this mission—in the behind-the-scenes work of intelligence and diplomacy...the idealistic efforts to support the establishment of free governments...the risky and essential task of battling our enemies. Some have demonstrated their commitment to our country through deaths that reflect their entire lives—and we will always honor their names and sacrifices.

All Americans have witnessed this idealism, and some for the first time. I ask our youngest citizens to believe the evidence of your eyes. You have seen duty and allegiance in the determined faces of our soldiers. You have seen that life is fragile, and evil is real, and courage triumphs. Make the choice to serve in a cause larger than your wants, larger than yourself—and in your days you will add not just to the wealth of our country, but to its character.

All Americans have seen this idealism, and some for the first time. I ask our youngest citizens to trust what you see. You’ve witnessed duty and loyalty in the determined faces of our soldiers. You’ve seen that life is fragile, evil is real, and courage wins. Choose to serve a cause bigger than your own desires, bigger than yourself—and in your lifetime, you will contribute not just to the wealth of our country, but to its character.

America has need of idealism and courage, because we have essential work at home—the unfinished work of American freedom. In a world moving toward liberty, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of liberty.

America needs idealism and courage because we have important work to do at home—the unfinished business of American freedom. In a world moving toward liberty, we are committed to demonstrating the meaning and promise of freedom.

In America's ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance—preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal.

In America's ideal of freedom, citizens find dignity and security through economic independence, rather than struggling just to get by. This broader definition of liberty inspired the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. Now, we will expand this vision by reforming major institutions to meet today's needs. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will raise standards in our schools and create an ownership society. We will increase ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings, and health insurance—preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen responsible for their own destiny, we will provide our fellow Americans with greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous, just, and equal.

In America's ideal of freedom, the public interest depends on private character—on integrity, and tolerance toward others, and the rule of conscience in our own lives. Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self. That edifice of character is built in families, supported by communities with standards, and sustained in our national life by the truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the varied faiths of our people. Americans move forward in every generation by reaffirming all that is good and true that came before—ideals of justice and conduct that are the same yesterday, today, and forever.

In America's vision of freedom, the public good depends on individual character—on integrity, tolerance for others, and following our conscience. Ultimately, self-governance is about mastering ourselves. This foundation of character is built within families, supported by communities with standards, and sustained in our national life by the truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the diverse beliefs of our people. Each generation of Americans moves forward by reaffirming all the good and true things from the past—ideals of justice and behavior that are consistent yesterday, today, and forever.

In America's ideal of freedom, the exercise of rights is ennobled by service, and mercy, and a heart for the weak. Liberty for all does not mean independence from one another. Our nation relies on men and women who look after a neighbor and surround the lost with love. Americans, at our best, value the life we see in one another, and must always remember that even the unwanted have worth. And our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.

In America's vision of freedom, exercising our rights is uplifted by service, compassion, and caring for the vulnerable. True liberty for everyone doesn’t mean being independent from each other. Our nation depends on people who take care of their neighbors and embrace those who are lost with love. At our best, Americans appreciate the humanity in each other and must always remember that even those who seem unwanted have value. Our country must reject all forms of racism, because we can't promote freedom while holding onto the weight of bigotry.

From the perspective of a single day, including this day of dedication, the issues and questions before our country are many. From the viewpoint of centuries, the questions that come to us are narrowed and few. Did our generation advance the cause of freedom? And did our character bring credit to that cause?

From the viewpoint of a single day, including this day of dedication, the issues and questions facing our country are numerous. However, from the perspective of centuries, the questions we face are few and straightforward. Did our generation push the cause of freedom forward? And did our character honor that cause?

These questions that judge us also unite us, because Americans of every party and background, Americans by choice and by birth, are bound to one another in the cause of freedom. We have known divisions, which must be healed to move forward in great purposes—and I will strive in good faith to heal them. Yet those divisions do not define America. We felt the unity and fellowship of our nation when freedom came under attack, and our response came like a single hand over a single heart. And we can feel that same unity and pride whenever America acts for good, and the victims of disaster are given hope, and the unjust encounter justice, and the captives are set free.

These questions that judge us also bring us together because Americans from all parties and backgrounds, whether by choice or by birth, are connected in the fight for freedom. We've faced divisions that need to be healed in order to move forward with our important goals—and I will work sincerely to heal them. However, those divisions don't define America. We felt the unity and bond of our nation when freedom was threatened, and our response came together like one hand over one heart. We can feel that same unity and pride whenever America does good, when disaster victims receive hope, when the unjust get justice, and when captives are freed.

We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner "Freedom Now"—they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.

We move forward with total confidence in the eventual victory of freedom. Not because history is guaranteed to unfold in a certain way; it’s human decisions that drive events. Not because we see ourselves as a special nation; God acts and chooses as He wishes. We are confident because freedom is the enduring hope of humanity, the need in dark times, the desire of the soul. When our Founders proclaimed a new era; when soldiers sacrificed their lives for a union built on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful protest under the banner "Freedom Now"—they were acting on a timeless hope that is meant to be realized. History has its ups and downs in terms of justice, but it also has a clear direction, guided by liberty and the Creator of Liberty.

When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, "It rang as if it meant something." In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength—tested, but not weary—we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.

When the Declaration of Independence was first read aloud in public and the Liberty Bell rang in celebration, a witness remarked, "It rang like it meant something." Today, it still means something. America, in this new century, announces freedom to the entire world and to all its people. Rejuvenated in our strength—tested but not tired—we are prepared for the greatest accomplishments in the history of freedom.

May God bless you, and may He watch over the United States of America.

May God bless you, and may He protect the United States of America.






NOTES—PRESIDENTS WHO WERE NOT INAUGURATED

JOHN TYLER Vice President John Tyler became President upon William Henry Harrison's death one month after his inauguration. U.S. Circuit Court Judge William Cranch administered the oath to Mr. Tyler at his residence in the Indian Queen Hotel on April 6, 1841.

JOHN TYLER Vice President John Tyler became President after William Henry Harrison's death just one month after his inauguration. U.S. Circuit Court Judge William Cranch gave the oath to Mr. Tyler at his home in the Indian Queen Hotel on April 6, 1841.

MILLARD FILLMORE Judge William Cranch administered the executive oath of office to Vice President Millard Fillmore on July 10, 1850 in the Hall of the House of Representatives. President Zachary Taylor had died the day before.

MILLARD FILLMORE Judge William Cranch administered the executive oath of office to Vice President Millard Fillmore on July 10, 1850, in the Hall of the House of Representatives. President Zachary Taylor had died the day before.

ANDREW JOHNSON On April 15, 1865, after visiting the wounded and dying President Lincoln in a house across the street from Ford's Theatre, the Vice President returned to his rooms at Kirkwood House. A few hours later he received the Cabinet and Chief Justice Salmon Chase in his rooms to take the executive oath of office.

ANDREW JOHNSON On April 15, 1865, after visiting the injured and dying President Lincoln in a house across the street from Ford's Theatre, the Vice President returned to his rooms at Kirkwood House. A few hours later, he met with the Cabinet and Chief Justice Salmon Chase in his rooms to take the oath of office.

CHESTER A. ARTHUR On September 20, 1881, upon the death of President Garfield, Vice President Arthur received a group at his home in New York City to take the oath of office, administered by New York Supreme Court Judge John R. Brady. The next day he again took the oath of office, administered by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, in the Vice President's Office in the Capitol in Washington, D.C.

CHESTER A. ARTHUR On September 20, 1881, after President Garfield passed away, Vice President Arthur welcomed a group at his home in New York City to take the oath of office, which was given by New York Supreme Court Judge John R. Brady. The following day, he took the oath of office again, administered by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, in the Vice President's Office at the Capitol in Washington, D.C.

GERALD R. FORD The Minority Leader of the House of Representatives became Vice President upon the resignation of Spiro Agnew, under the process of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution. When President Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974, Vice President Ford took the executive oath of office, administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger, in the East Room of the White House.

GERALD R. FORD The Minority Leader of the House of Representatives became Vice President after Spiro Agnew resigned, following the process outlined in the 25th Amendment to the Constitution. When President Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974, Vice President Ford took the oath of office, administered by Chief Justice Warren Burger, in the East Room of the White House.

EXECUTIVE OATH OF OFFICE "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

EXECUTIVE OATH OF OFFICE "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully carry out the duties of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 8

United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 8






Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!